Sent by gmaxwell from January 24, 2018 until February 15, 2019


Wed Feb 13 06:01:01 2019: 1 to odolvlobo (history) for Re: Luke Jr's 300kb blocks
Wed Feb 13 05:57:24 2019: 1 to odolvlobo (history) for Re: Craight Wright is he really Satoshi?
Tue Feb 12 09:44:17 2019: 1 to DooMAD (history) for Re: Whats up with Craig Wright?
Mon Feb 11 02:42:19 2019: 1 to aliashraf (history) for Re: 10x scaleup & Stable TPS: new blocks carry hashes of TXs, no TXs themself ??
Mon Jan 14 18:35:43 2019: 2 to Wind_FURY (history) for Re: Ethereum Anti-ASIC fork, is it the right time for bitcoin too?
Sat Jan 12 23:34:58 2019: 1 to achow101 (history) for Bitcoin Core 0.17.1 Released
Wed Jan 9 10:01:04 2019: 2 to theymos (history) for LN annoyances
Wed Jan 9 00:07:29 2019: 1 to Carlton Banks (history) for Re: If non-Segwit nodes are not full nodes, how does it affect legacy addresses?
Fri Jan 4 20:24:56 2019: 1 to Carlton Banks (history) for Re: [Scaling] Minisketch - Unmoderated
Wed Dec 26 17:56:33 2018: 5 to RHavar (history) for Re: CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world
Fri Dec 14 10:55:52 2018: 1 to franky1 (history) for Re: The release of Satoshi's personal data
Fri Dec 7 00:11:35 2018: 1 to DooMAD (history) for Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
Fri Nov 23 09:51:55 2018: 1 to aliashraf (history) for Re: Was Satoshi's coding ability considered bad?
Tue Nov 13 21:52:20 2018: 1 to hatshepsut93 (history) for Re: Was Satoshi's coding ability considered bad?
Tue Nov 13 21:51:42 2018: 1 to YarkoL (history) for Re: Was Satoshi's coding ability considered bad?
Sat Nov 10 22:58:36 2018: 1 to mu_enrico (history) for Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
Sat Nov 10 20:41:58 2018: 1 to achow101 (history) for Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
Fri Nov 2 19:13:10 2018: 1 to achow101 (history) for Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
Fri Nov 2 19:12:31 2018: 1 to achow101 (history) for Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
Sat Oct 20 03:25:13 2018: 2 to piotr_n (history) for Re: Are blockchain tracking sites tracking Segwit adoption wrong?
Fri Oct 19 06:41:35 2018: 2 to vit05 (history) for BitMEX Research new client (Bitcoin BitMEX Research client)
Wed Sep 26 03:42:54 2018: 1 to vit05 (history) for Re: why is core development and hosting centralized?
Sun Sep 23 20:50:22 2018: 1 to theymos (history) for Re: When Schnorr will be added?
Thu Sep 20 01:11:04 2018: 1 to tomywomy (history) for Re: Flaws in LN (Lightning Network).
Thu Sep 20 01:10:12 2018: 1 to Wind_FURY (history) for Re: Flaws in LN (Lightning Network).
Wed Sep 19 00:14:18 2018: 2 to theymos (history) for DoS in Bitcoin Core: update required
Mon Aug 13 17:31:32 2018: 2 to achow101 (history) for Re: Random or user-specified ports
Sat Aug 11 09:35:28 2018: 1 to Wind_FURY (history) for Re: Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X)
Thu Aug 9 01:10:33 2018: 1 to Wind_FURY (history) for Re: BAKKT: Road to $100,000+ starts in november?
Thu Aug 9 01:08:37 2018: 1 to DooMAD (history) for Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread
Thu Aug 9 01:08:28 2018: 1 to DooMAD (history) for Re: Is the Lightning Network centralized?
Thu Aug 9 01:06:15 2018: 1 to achow101 (history) for Re: Which bitcoin core version is best for Merchant website
Thu Aug 9 01:06:03 2018: 1 to achow101 (history) for deleted post
Thu Aug 9 01:05:30 2018: 1 to achow101 (history) for Re: What are these wallet addresses??
Thu Aug 9 01:04:41 2018: 1 to achow101 (history) for Re: Change genesis block, regtest mining fail
Thu Aug 9 01:04:25 2018: 1 to achow101 (history) for Re: In need of TxID and WTxID of BIP143 transactions for UnitTesting
Thu Aug 9 00:59:51 2018: 1 to sidehack (history) for Re: GekkoScience is now dabbling with 16nm ASICs for new designs
Thu Aug 9 00:53:09 2018: 1 to NotFuzzyWarm (history) for deleted post
Fri Aug 3 02:28:47 2018: 2 to HCP (history) for Re: send from "1xxx..." to "3xxx..." ?
Wed Aug 1 21:55:27 2018: 2 to cellard (history) for Re: Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X)
Wed Aug 1 20:32:47 2018: 2 to Coinr8d (history) for Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted)
Mon Jul 30 09:40:06 2018: 2 to achow101 (history) for Re: different version have different SignatureHash?
Mon Jul 30 05:53:46 2018: 1 to DooMAD (history) for Re: Anunymint ban
Mon Jul 30 05:52:59 2018: 1 to DooMAD (history) for Re: Anunymint ban
Tue Jul 24 22:08:57 2018: 1 to Wind_FURY (history) for Re: Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X)
Sun Jul 22 02:46:25 2018: 1 to JayJuanGee (history) for Anunymint ban
Sun Jul 22 02:45:20 2018: 1 to Lauda (history) for Re: Anunymint ban
Fri Feb 9 09:58:57 2018: 1 to nullius (history) for Re: Random Number On Blockchain
Fri Feb 9 09:25:55 2018: 3 to nullius (history) for Re: How would it be know if a segwit thieft actually happened?



Received by gmaxwell from January 24, 2018 until February 15, 2019


Thu Feb 14 11:11:45 2019: 1 from o_e_l_e_o (history)for Re: Why is there missing numbers among BIPs?
Thu Feb 14 00:18:49 2019: 3 from leonair (history)for Re: Luke Jr's 300kb blocks
Wed Feb 13 22:46:52 2019: 2 from LoyceV (history)for Re: Why is there missing numbers among BIPs?
Wed Feb 13 20:12:23 2019: 2 from LoyceV (history)for Re: Luke Jr's 300kb blocks
Wed Feb 13 19:35:20 2019: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: Luke Jr's 300kb blocks
Wed Feb 13 19:34:08 2019: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: Why is there missing numbers among BIPs?
Wed Feb 13 18:57:55 2019: 1 from BobLawblaw (history)for Re: Luke Jr's 300kb blocks
Wed Feb 13 17:30:12 2019: 1 from BitcoinFX (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite
Wed Feb 13 17:09:57 2019: 1 from aliashraf (history)for Re: Luke Jr's 300kb blocks
Wed Feb 13 16:54:12 2019: 1 from 1Referee (history)for Re: Luke Jr's 300kb blocks
Wed Feb 13 16:01:38 2019: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: Luke Jr's 300kb blocks
Wed Feb 13 15:20:33 2019: 3 from bones261 (history)for Re: Why is there missing numbers among BIPs?
Wed Feb 13 14:49:15 2019: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Craight Wright is he really Satoshi?
Wed Feb 13 14:42:08 2019: 5 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Why is there missing numbers among BIPs?
Wed Feb 13 14:34:51 2019: 1 from Coding Enthusiast (history)for Re: Why is there missing numbers among BIPs?
Wed Feb 13 13:43:01 2019: 5 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Whats up with Craig Wright?
Wed Feb 13 13:14:42 2019: 1 from BobLawblaw (history)for Re: Luke Jr's 300kb blocks
Wed Feb 13 09:08:08 2019: 1 from JayJuanGee (history)for Re: Anunymint ban
Wed Feb 13 08:34:33 2019: 1 from nutildah (history)for Re: Whats up with Craig Wright?
Wed Feb 13 07:19:01 2019: 2 from aliashraf (history)for Re: Luke Jr's 300kb blocks
Tue Feb 12 19:46:10 2019: 2 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: Whats up with Craig Wright?
Tue Feb 12 16:05:40 2019: 6 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Whats up with Craig Wright?
Tue Feb 12 15:16:40 2019: 1 from BitcoinFX (history)for Re: Whats up with Craig Wright?
Mon Feb 11 20:54:40 2019: 2 from bones261 (history)for Re: 10x scaleup & Stable TPS: new blocks carry hashes of TXs, no TXs themself ??
Mon Feb 11 17:21:03 2019: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: 10x scaleup & Stable TPS: new blocks carry hashes of TXs, no TXs themself ??
Mon Feb 11 13:56:27 2019: 1 from aliashraf (history)for Re: 10x scaleup & Stable TPS: new blocks carry hashes of TXs, no TXs themself ??
Mon Feb 11 03:38:35 2019: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: 10x scaleup & Stable TPS: new blocks carry hashes of TXs, no TXs themself ??
Mon Feb 11 02:51:08 2019: 3 from bones261 (history)for Re: 10x scaleup & Stable TPS: new blocks carry hashes of TXs, no TXs themself ??
Sun Feb 10 17:43:20 2019: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: Super BrainFlayer 2019 - Enormous Blooms, Gigantic Text-Files, all BTC ADDRESSES
Fri Feb 8 03:45:26 2019: 1 from mescalito (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite
Tue Feb 5 19:22:29 2019: 3 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: A couple of questions regarding Schnorr MuSig algorithm math notation
Tue Feb 5 12:06:06 2019: 4 from chimk (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite
Tue Feb 5 06:35:45 2019: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite WWW w/ OuterNet USB Reciever.
Tue Feb 5 02:38:42 2019: 3 from EFS (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite
Tue Feb 5 02:33:52 2019: 3 from EFS (history)for Re: Craight Wright is he really Satoshi?
Mon Feb 4 19:01:21 2019: 2 from vit05 (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite WWW w/ OuterNet USB Reciever.
Mon Feb 4 15:17:48 2019: 1 from vapourminer (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite
Mon Feb 4 11:42:44 2019: 1 from HeRetiK (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite
Mon Feb 4 11:40:50 2019: 4 from Carlton Banks (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite
Mon Feb 4 10:47:21 2019: 1 from Pmalek (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite
Mon Feb 4 04:33:55 2019: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite
Mon Feb 4 03:22:07 2019: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: Blockstream's Bitcoin Satelite
Thu Jan 31 10:24:10 2019: 1 from xtraelv (history)for Re: Segregated Witness legal flaw and its probable technical solutions
Sat Jan 26 23:34:58 2019: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: [Discussion] Dandelion - A protocol to hide transaction origin
Sat Jan 26 23:31:27 2019: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: New Way to Generate Bitcoin Addresses!
Sat Jan 26 23:30:55 2019: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Are blockchain tracking sites tracking Segwit adoption wrong?
Sat Jan 26 23:30:35 2019: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Are blockchain tracking sites tracking Segwit adoption wrong?
Sat Jan 26 23:30:11 2019: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Funny how inflation bug was swept under the rug
Sat Jan 26 23:29:45 2019: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Sat Jan 26 23:29:26 2019: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: inbuilt transaction type in bitcoin to improve scalability massively?
Sat Jan 26 23:28:58 2019: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Sat Jan 26 23:28:37 2019: 5 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Thu Jan 24 03:04:48 2019: 4 from suchmoon (history)for Re: A couple of questions regarding Schnorr MuSig algorithm math notation
Tue Jan 22 13:51:29 2019: 2 from o_e_l_e_o (history)for Re: Craight Wright is he really Satoshi?
Mon Jan 21 16:48:59 2019: 1 from o_e_l_e_o (history)for Re: Craight Wright is he really Satoshi?
Mon Jan 21 06:06:47 2019: 1 from pooya87 (history)for Re: Craight Wright is he really Satoshi?
Mon Jan 21 00:57:33 2019: 1 from squatter (history)for Re: Craight Wright is he really Satoshi?
Sun Jan 20 03:09:44 2019: 5 from dbshck (history)for Re: A couple of questions regarding Schnorr MuSig algorithm math notation
Thu Jan 17 10:31:57 2019: 1 from hakka (history)for Transaction cut-through
Wed Jan 9 05:46:15 2019: 8 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Wed Jan 9 05:41:43 2019: 12 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Mon Jan 7 04:32:41 2019: 4 from DarkStar_ (history)for Re: [Scaling] Minisketch - Unmoderated
Sat Jan 5 02:00:08 2019: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: [Scaling] Minisketch - Unmoderated
Tue Jan 1 12:49:11 2019: 1 from Last of the V8s (history)for Re: Turing completeness and state for smart contract
Sun Dec 30 09:27:06 2018: 1 from Toxic2040 (history)for Re: How Many Full Nodes Bitcoin Online ?
Sun Dec 30 05:33:27 2018: 1 from bitserve (history)for Re: How Many Full Nodes Bitcoin Online ?
Sat Dec 29 22:45:26 2018: 1 from franky1 (history)for Re: How Many Full Nodes Bitcoin Online ?
Sat Dec 29 22:23:09 2018: 1 from MagicByt3 (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Sat Dec 29 19:12:17 2018: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: How Many Full Nodes Bitcoin Online ?
Sat Dec 29 11:18:13 2018: 1 from aliashraf (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Sat Dec 29 00:37:03 2018: 5 from HairyMaclairy (history)for Re: How Many Full Nodes Bitcoin Online ?
Fri Dec 28 08:24:22 2018: 1 from VB1001 (history)for Re: How Many Full Nodes Bitcoin Online ?
Fri Dec 28 07:34:23 2018: 1 from bitserve (history)for Re: How Many Full Nodes Bitcoin Online ?
Fri Dec 28 06:19:54 2018: 1 from infofront (history)for Re: How Many Full Nodes Bitcoin Online ?
Fri Dec 28 04:28:19 2018: 1 from Hueristic (history)for Re: How Many Full Nodes Bitcoin Online ?
Fri Dec 28 02:12:45 2018: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Thu Dec 27 08:52:01 2018: 2 from aliashraf (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Thu Dec 27 05:43:33 2018: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Thu Dec 27 04:52:01 2018: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Thu Dec 27 04:50:50 2018: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Thu Dec 27 04:50:26 2018: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: A new idea for node reward
Thu Dec 27 04:50:04 2018: 5 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Anti-pool algorithm PoW
Thu Dec 27 04:49:46 2018: 5 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Lightning network proposal, use U2F tokens as hardware wallets
Thu Dec 27 04:49:25 2018: 6 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Why use RFC6979 and is there any downsides?
Thu Dec 27 04:16:58 2018: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Thu Dec 27 04:11:50 2018: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Thu Dec 27 01:32:07 2018: 4 from suchmoon (history)for Re: Is gossip protocol in Bitcoin perfect?
Wed Dec 26 15:08:43 2018: 1 from Majormax (history)for Re: New Way to Generate Bitcoin Addresses!
Tue Dec 25 05:05:03 2018: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: Proof of author rights with time from blockchain
Mon Dec 24 19:58:42 2018: 1 from mixoftix (history)for Re: [SCALING] Minisketch
Mon Dec 24 02:47:00 2018: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: [SCALING] Minisketch
Sun Dec 23 21:52:01 2018: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: [SCALING] Minisketch
Sun Dec 23 13:11:43 2018: 1 from HeRetiK (history)for Re: [SCALING] Minisketch
Fri Dec 21 16:35:40 2018: 4 from suchmoon (history)for Re: Anti-pool algorithm PoW
Wed Dec 19 22:39:30 2018: 1 from aliashraf (history)for Re: Anti-pool algorithm PoW
Wed Dec 19 06:30:16 2018: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: Anti-pool algorithm PoW
Sun Dec 16 18:13:09 2018: 3 from Coding Enthusiast (history)for Re: Why use RFC6979 and is there any downsides?
Sat Dec 15 15:58:24 2018: 4 from dbshck (history)for Re: Why use RFC6979 and is there any downsides?
Fri Dec 14 23:10:18 2018: 4 from DarkStar_ (history)for Re: Why use RFC6979 and is there any downsides?
Thu Dec 13 01:01:26 2018: 4 from suchmoon (history)for Re: HUGE PROBLEM, LOST MASSIVE AMOUNT OF BTC. 100 BTC is Reward
Sun Dec 9 16:09:57 2018: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: New Way to Generate Bitcoin Addresses!
Sun Dec 9 14:44:33 2018: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Is it possible to intentionally not submit a share that solves the block?
Sun Dec 9 14:44:02 2018: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: The situation wrt 0.16.3 version highlights urgency of streamlining updates
Sun Dec 9 14:43:16 2018: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Sun Dec 9 14:42:52 2018: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Sun Dec 9 14:42:27 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: HUGE PROBLEM, LOST MASSIVE AMOUNT OF BTC. 100 BTC is Reward
Sun Dec 9 14:41:54 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED - what is it?
Sun Dec 9 14:41:25 2018: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Safe to run BitcoinCore 0.11.0?
Sun Dec 9 14:40:53 2018: 5 from Foxpup (history)for Re: HUGE PROBLEM, LOST MASSIVE AMOUNT OF BTC. 100 BTC is Reward
Fri Nov 30 08:03:41 2018: 8 from LoyceV (history)for Re: HUGE PROBLEM, LOST MASSIVE AMOUNT OF BTC. 100 BTC is Reward
Fri Nov 30 03:55:34 2018: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: HUGE PROBLEM, LOST MASSIVE AMOUNT OF BTC. 100 BTC is Reward
Thu Nov 29 22:03:53 2018: 1 from iasenko (history)for Re: HUGE PROBLEM, LOST MASSIVE AMOUNT OF BTC. 100 BTC is Reward
Wed Nov 28 19:25:16 2018: 4 from suchmoon (history)for Re: Super BrainFlayer 2019 - Enormous Blooms, Gigantic Text-Files, all BTC ADDRESSES
Wed Nov 28 14:28:09 2018: 2 from o_e_l_e_o (history)for Re: Super BrainFlayer 2019 - Enormous Blooms, Gigantic Text-Files, all BTC ADDRESSES
Wed Nov 28 11:31:20 2018: 1 from Pmalek (history)for Re: Super BrainFlayer 2019 - Enormous Blooms, Gigantic Text-Files, all BTC ADDRESSES
Wed Nov 28 06:41:29 2018: 1 from amishmanish (history)for Re: Super BrainFlayer 2019 - Enormous Blooms, Gigantic Text-Files, all BTC ADDRESSES
Wed Nov 28 03:51:20 2018: 2 from bones261 (history)for Re: Super BrainFlayer 2019 - Enormous Blooms, Gigantic Text-Files, all BTC ADDRESSES
Wed Nov 28 00:14:51 2018: 1 from aliashraf (history)for Re: "backupwallet(importwallet)" command VS "copy" command
Sun Nov 25 08:14:11 2018: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: How to prevent SPAM in a flood fill network ?
Sun Nov 25 08:13:46 2018: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Isn't doing % N while generating a random key a flaw?
Sun Nov 25 08:13:23 2018: 5 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
Sun Nov 25 08:12:56 2018: 5 from Foxpup (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Sun Nov 25 08:12:31 2018: 8 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
Sat Nov 17 21:46:29 2018: 1 from HCP (history)for Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
Thu Nov 15 15:04:25 2018: 1 from fluidjax (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Mon Nov 12 15:02:16 2018: 1 from bones261 (history)for Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
Mon Nov 12 13:51:02 2018: 1 from mu_enrico (history)for Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
Mon Nov 12 07:47:56 2018: 1 from JayJuanGee (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Sun Nov 11 22:31:28 2018: 10 from suchmoon (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Sun Nov 11 18:51:01 2018: 1 from HairyMaclairy (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Sun Nov 11 17:53:28 2018: 1 from bob123 (history)for Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
Sat Nov 10 16:28:34 2018: 1 from OgNasty (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Sat Nov 10 08:20:37 2018: 3 from mindrust (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Fri Nov 9 15:44:51 2018: 2 from ibminer (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Fri Nov 9 15:09:29 2018: 1 from BobLawblaw (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Fri Nov 9 13:53:11 2018: 2 from vapourminer (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Fri Nov 9 13:25:46 2018: 4 from Welsh (history)for Re: Are blockchain tracking sites tracking Segwit adoption wrong?
Fri Nov 9 05:08:19 2018: 35 from bg002h (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Fri Nov 9 04:06:40 2018: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Fri Nov 9 04:06:12 2018: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Fri Nov 9 04:05:44 2018: 5 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Outernet Bitcoin service?
Fri Nov 9 04:05:12 2018: 8 from Foxpup (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Fri Nov 9 03:31:53 2018: 1 from Steamtyme (history)for Re: coingeek.com claims former blockstream cto gregory maxwell "sees light"
Wed Oct 24 04:35:04 2018: 12 from Foxpup (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Wed Oct 24 04:34:09 2018: 15 from Foxpup (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Wed Oct 24 03:49:48 2018: 2 from bones261 (history)for Re: Is it possible to intentionally not submit a share that solves the block?
Wed Oct 24 03:05:31 2018: 4 from suchmoon (history)for Re: Is it possible to intentionally not submit a share that solves the block?
Mon Oct 22 13:21:11 2018: 1 from itod (history)for Re: Was Satoshi's coding ability considered bad?
Fri Oct 19 07:28:21 2018: 2 from aliashraf (history)for Re: Was Satoshi's coding ability considered bad?
Fri Oct 19 06:51:47 2018: 2 from bones261 (history)for Re: Was Satoshi's coding ability considered bad?
Wed Oct 17 08:58:15 2018: 1 from JayJuanGee (history)for Re: Satoshi's Fortune lower bound is 100M USD
Sat Oct 13 19:57:10 2018: 5 from Jet Cash (history)for Re: Bitcoin Core 0.17 no new address button
Mon Oct 8 12:00:45 2018: 4 from Welsh (history)for Re: How to prevent SPAM in a flood fill network ?
Sat Oct 6 17:27:55 2018: 2 from bones261 (history)for Re: How to prevent SPAM in a flood fill network ?
Sat Oct 6 07:33:54 2018: 20 from Foxpup (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Thu Sep 27 10:18:44 2018: 1 from HeRetiK (history)for Re: Isn't doing % N while generating a random key a flaw?
Thu Sep 27 06:58:17 2018: 1 from Coding Enthusiast (history)for Re: Isn't doing % N while generating a random key a flaw?
Thu Sep 27 03:24:49 2018: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: Isn't doing % N while generating a random key a flaw?
Thu Sep 27 02:46:50 2018: 4 from suchmoon (history)for Re: Isn't doing % N while generating a random key a flaw?
Mon Sep 24 22:04:40 2018: 2 from DooMAD (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Mon Sep 24 08:56:59 2018: 1 from JayJuanGee (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Mon Sep 24 08:52:52 2018: 1 from JayJuanGee (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Mon Sep 24 06:10:39 2018: 1 from BobLawblaw (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Mon Sep 24 03:46:31 2018: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Mon Sep 24 03:42:34 2018: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Mon Sep 24 01:15:12 2018: 4 from suchmoon (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Mon Sep 24 01:13:40 2018: 4 from suchmoon (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Mon Sep 24 01:07:25 2018: 20 from Foxpup (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Sun Sep 23 20:51:29 2018: 1 from aliashraf (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Sun Sep 23 20:12:18 2018: 10 from theymos (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Sun Sep 23 19:41:36 2018: 10 from theymos_away (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Sun Sep 23 19:02:45 2018: 2 from bones261 (history)for Re: The duplicate input vulnerability shouldn't be forgotten
Sat Sep 22 06:59:06 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Bitcoin Core 0.16.3 Released
Tue Sep 18 12:32:47 2018: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Deterministic wallets
Wed Sep 12 21:23:34 2018: 4 from suchmoon (history)for Re: Threshold Multisignatures for Bitcoin
Tue Sep 11 13:12:01 2018: 1 from Kakmakr (history)for Blocksonly mode BW savings, the limits of efficient block xfer, and better relay
Sat Sep 8 09:57:13 2018: 3 from Wind_FURY (history)for Re: Total Number of full nodes operating. Less than 10k.
Sat Sep 8 04:56:03 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Total Number of full nodes operating. Less than 10k.
Thu Sep 6 16:15:38 2018: 4 from suchmoon (history)for Re: Total Number of full nodes operating. Less than 10k.
Thu Sep 6 08:56:53 2018: 1 from squatter (history)for Re: Total Number of full nodes operating. Less than 10k.
Thu Sep 6 05:06:27 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Total Number of full nodes operating. Less than 10k.
Wed Sep 5 09:36:49 2018: 1 from Wind_FURY (history)for Re: Total Number of full nodes operating. Less than 10k.
Mon Sep 3 05:06:16 2018: 5 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Total Number of full nodes operating. Less than 10k.
Sun Sep 2 19:45:07 2018: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: Total Number of full nodes operating. Less than 10k.
Sun Sep 2 16:56:07 2018: 1 from bitmover (history)for Re: Total Number of full nodes operating. Less than 10k.
Sun Sep 2 05:41:02 2018: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Total Number of full nodes operating. Less than 10k.
Fri Aug 31 12:57:10 2018: 1 from NeuroticFish (history)for Re: 10 min (on average) for block time? is it a rule?
Thu Aug 30 02:10:03 2018: 3 from DarkStar_ (history)for Re: Threshold Multisignatures for Bitcoin
Wed Aug 29 06:09:41 2018: 6 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Threshold Multisignatures for Bitcoin
Mon Aug 27 07:17:03 2018: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: 10 min (on average) for block time? is it a rule?
Sun Aug 26 07:26:20 2018: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: 10 min (on average) for block time? is it a rule?
Sun Aug 26 04:29:57 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: 10 min (on average) for block time? is it a rule?
Thu Aug 23 08:24:08 2018: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Creating private key from 2 different RNG:s?
Thu Aug 23 08:23:12 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (test data wanted)
Thu Aug 23 08:22:47 2018: 9 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (test data wanted)
Mon Aug 20 22:31:52 2018: 1 from LoyceV (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Wed Aug 15 01:26:22 2018: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: how ThreadOpenConnections work?
Thu Aug 9 13:59:49 2018: 2 from malevolent (history)for Re: An analysis of Mining Variance and Proximity Premium flaws in Bitcoin
Mon Aug 6 02:50:03 2018: 7 from suchmoon (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (test data wanted)
Sat Aug 4 08:00:35 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (test data wanted)
Thu Aug 2 15:00:03 2018: 1 from TheArchaeologist (history)for Re: Just a few question about transactions
Thu Aug 2 06:23:48 2018: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X)
Thu Aug 2 05:42:45 2018: 6 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted)
Wed Aug 1 17:05:17 2018: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: An analysis of Mining Variance and Proximity Premium flaws in Bitcoin
Wed Aug 1 04:35:08 2018: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Which bitcoin core version is best for Merchant website
Fri Jul 27 05:06:15 2018: 2 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Need some clarification on usage of the nonce in version message
Mon Jul 23 06:04:38 2018: 6 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Anunymint ban
Mon Jul 23 02:41:27 2018: 1 from digaran (history)for Re: Anunymint ban
Sun Jul 22 22:44:08 2018: 10 from spin (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted)
Sun Jul 22 21:38:47 2018: 1 from Anon136 (history)for Re: Anunymint ban
Sun Jul 22 13:16:54 2018: 50 from Lauda (history)for Re: Anunymint ban
Sun Jul 22 10:06:47 2018: 2 from mprep (history)for Re: Anunymint ban
Sun Jul 22 05:19:33 2018: 8 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Anunymint ban
Sat Jul 21 10:14:31 2018: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: An analysis of Mining Variance and Proximity Premium flaws in Bitcoin
Sat Jul 21 08:51:03 2018: 3 from bob123 (history)for Re: An analysis of Mining Variance and Proximity Premium flaws in Bitcoin
Sat Jul 21 04:11:16 2018: 8 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted)
Sat Jul 21 04:09:47 2018: 4 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted)
Thu Jul 19 21:05:48 2018: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted)
Thu Jul 19 16:30:08 2018: 7 from suchmoon (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted)
Thu Jul 19 13:49:00 2018: 1 from qwk (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted)
Thu Jul 19 03:26:30 2018: 10 from theymos_away (history)for Re: Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted)
Tue Jul 17 07:26:17 2018: 1 from JayJuanGee (history)for Re: Will Schnorr signatures be able to give us default "CoinJoined" transactions?
Tue Jul 17 05:29:16 2018: 35 from Hueristic (history)for Signature aggregation for improved scalablity.
Sun Jun 10 17:11:19 2018: 10 from monbux (history)for CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world
Tue May 22 07:10:32 2018: 2 from Lutpin (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Wed May 2 21:05:28 2018: 1 from smooth (history)for CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world
Wed May 2 04:55:58 2018: 5 from ebliever (history)for CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world
Tue Mar 20 17:29:18 2018: 1 from eroxors (history)for Deterministic wallets
Sat Mar 17 16:28:00 2018: 1 from gembitz (history)for Re: looked at bitcoind source and looks like a shitcode
Wed Mar 14 03:14:33 2018: 4 from mprep (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Tue Mar 13 05:21:25 2018: 1 from Foxpup (history)for Re: TX Only Valid Until X Block
Tue Mar 13 05:21:18 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: TX Only Valid Until X Block
Mon Mar 12 01:25:18 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: WTF is this? Someone found a trick for fast mining
Mon Mar 12 01:25:07 2018: 1 from Foxpup (history)for Re: WTF is this? Someone found a trick for fast mining
Mon Mar 12 01:24:50 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: WTF is this? Someone found a trick for fast mining
Sun Mar 11 20:07:59 2018: 2 from ebliever (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Sun Mar 11 20:07:19 2018: 2 from ebliever (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Sun Mar 11 02:27:48 2018: 1 from Foxpup (history)for Re: How bitcoin dev's are helping to kill bitcoin
Sat Mar 10 07:50:14 2018: 1 from ruletheworld (history)for Re: Random Number On Blockchain
Thu Mar 8 03:56:19 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Random Number On Blockchain
Wed Mar 7 13:44:23 2018: 6 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company?
Wed Mar 7 13:44:14 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Is it good or bad that Core development is virtually controlled by one company?
Wed Mar 7 10:38:54 2018: 2 from Samarkand (history)for Re: Why to write down your seed? regular InfoSec policies say never write passwords
Wed Mar 7 06:03:55 2018: 6 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Current SegWit code does not fix O(n^2)
Wed Mar 7 06:01:26 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Current SegWit code does not fix O(n^2)
Wed Mar 7 03:39:30 2018: 6 from Foxpup (history)for Re: nullc reddit account suspended 2/23/17 What's the story?
Wed Mar 7 02:35:55 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Why to write down your seed? regular InfoSec policies say never write passwords
Tue Mar 6 23:42:44 2018: 1 from nullius (history)for Re: Why to write down your seed? regular InfoSec policies say never write passwords
Tue Mar 6 03:24:09 2018: 2 from malevolent (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Tue Mar 6 00:34:59 2018: 2 from malevolent (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Mon Mar 5 07:02:12 2018: 2 from TMAN (history)for Re: Pieter and Greg, Bech32, please
Mon Mar 5 07:01:52 2018: 5 from TMAN (history)for Re: How would it be know if a segwit thieft actually happened?
Mon Mar 5 07:01:22 2018: 15 from TMAN (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Thu Mar 1 05:40:56 2018: 1 from ETFbitcoin (history)for CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world
Mon Feb 26 11:09:59 2018: 1 from pebwindkraft (history)for Re: looked at bitcoind source and looks like a shitcode
Sun Feb 25 14:39:25 2018: 1 from Foxpup (history)for Re: So who the hell is still supporting BU?
Sat Feb 24 03:21:03 2018: 1 from Foxpup (history)for Re: looked at bitcoind source and looks like a shitcode
Sat Feb 24 02:22:49 2018: 1 from HCP (history)for Re: looked at bitcoind source and looks like a shitcode
Wed Feb 21 18:04:14 2018: 2 from DannyHamilton (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Wed Feb 21 18:01:31 2018: 2 from DannyHamilton (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Tue Feb 20 13:12:57 2018: 1 from JayJuanGee (history)for Re: How would it be know if a segwit thieft actually happened?
Fri Feb 16 22:19:02 2018: 1 from Taras (history)for Re: How many nodes blockchain.info has?
Thu Feb 15 14:39:11 2018: 1 from LoyceV (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Wed Feb 14 16:23:00 2018: 5 from RGBKey (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Wed Feb 14 16:02:43 2018: 10 from Lauda (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Tue Feb 13 10:06:15 2018: 3 from mprep (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Tue Feb 13 03:57:47 2018: 5 from nullius (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Tue Feb 13 02:57:41 2018: 2 from RGBKey (history)for Re: segvan: Segwit vanity address & bulk address generator
Mon Feb 12 20:54:48 2018: 1 from Financisto (history)for Deterministic wallets
Mon Feb 12 20:51:13 2018: 1 from Financisto (history)for CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world
Mon Feb 12 03:43:12 2018: 1 from nullius (history)for Re: Random Number On Blockchain
Sun Feb 11 06:20:37 2018: 1 from Wind_FURY (history)for Re: How many nodes blockchain.info has?
Sat Feb 10 07:33:10 2018: 1 from amishmanish (history)for Re: How would it be know if a segwit thieft actually happened?
Sat Feb 10 02:38:45 2018: 1 from Foxpup (history)for Re: How many nodes blockchain.info has?
Sat Feb 10 00:59:43 2018: 40 from nullius (history)for Re: How would it be know if a segwit thieft actually happened?
Fri Feb 9 12:56:30 2018: 3 from Foxpup (history)for Re: How would it be know if a segwit thieft actually happened?
Fri Feb 9 10:20:59 2018: 1 from Jet Cash (history)for Re: Latest bitcoin core?
Fri Feb 9 01:43:10 2018: 1 from nullius (history)for Re: SegWit and SPV-mining. What if...?
Wed Feb 7 02:16:03 2018: 1 from Dabs (history)for deleted post
Sun Feb 4 08:58:22 2018: 1 from figmentofmyass (history)for Re: Pieter and Greg, Bech32, please
Wed Jan 31 02:21:36 2018: 1 from nullius (history)for Re: Using a DHT to reduce the resource requirements of full nodes.
Tue Jan 30 18:28:35 2018: 1 from nullius (history)for Re: Pieter and Greg, Bech32, please
Tue Jan 30 18:28:13 2018: 1 from nullius (history)for Re: Pieter and Greg, Bech32, please
Fri Jan 26 05:15:32 2018: 6 from Foxpup (history)for Re: Pieter and Greg, Bech32, please
Thu Jan 25 06:49:56 2018: 1 from cinnamon_carter (history)for Re: Greg Maxwell aka /u/nullc is banned from Reddit
Thu Jan 25 01:59:36 2018: 1 from OgNasty (history)for deleted post