All posts made by Lauda in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 10049165 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Quote from: Tzupy on January 05, 2015, 06:14:03 PM
Few months back $275 seemed dirt cheap and a gift from satoshi and now we touched it as resistance after a low volume bounce.



 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Yes and if we were to experience a 2013 rate of growth again reinstate Willy, we'd be put at $35k/BTC at the end of november. Funny this market, ain't it?

FTFY Wink
Then reinstate him. What are you waiting for?



2. Post 10049627 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

No exploit can be used to get coins from 'cold storage'. If it can, then those coins weren't really in cold storage.



3. Post 10270018 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: mmitech on January 26, 2015, 07:08:10 PM
This forum needs a button called "Mark as Troll", if enough people mark somebody as a Troll, all their messages can go straight to the "moon" folder where nobody has to read them.

The ignore button (a couple of years ago) used to glow from light yellow to darker orange depending on the amount of ignores, so if you saw someone with a glowing Ignore button you knew he was ignored by so many users(doesnt mean he is a troll though), you know someone like you would have a red glowing button.... but thanks to Theymos and his free speech hardcore support (which I do support as well) this doesn't work anymore.
Indeed. How about someone suggests this for the new forum. Should be easy to implement.

I've been looking, well carefully following the thread (since my last post here). The amount of trolls is amazing.
Whatever happens (price goes down, or even when it goes up like today) they keep spreading FUD or mocking us and/or Bitcoin.'Free speech' is important, but there has to be a limit somewhere.



4. Post 10271023 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: riiiiising on January 26, 2015, 07:21:07 PM
Indeed. How about someone suggests this for the new forum. Should be easy to implement.

I've been looking, well carefully following the thread (since my last post here). The amount of trolls is amazing.
Whatever happens (price goes down, or even when it goes up like today) they keep spreading FUD or mocking us and/or Bitcoin.'Free speech' is important, but there has to be a limit somewhere.

I thought bitcoin was about freedom... but you can't even tolerate some criticism of your Internet funbux? I guess some the trolls have hit a nerve, huh?
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. The amount of trolling can't even be considered 'some'. It is almost on par with the normal/constructive posts these days (definitely if you include the altcoin section).
Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 26, 2015, 08:44:24 PM
Hmmm have we found support?

Um, no. We are stalling for seven hours so we can get the full Chinese panic from the next big dump.
Not going to happen.



5. Post 10739656 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: byronbb on March 11, 2015, 04:57:08 PM
Tastes like a breakout is coming.

We'll who is buying the 7k wall @300 on bitstamp? I left my last 2 million in my other pants.
I was just about to point out the resistance on Bitstamp when I've stumbled upon your post. Looks like the wall was reduced to 5.5k which is a little better, but still a lot of money.
I guess we will have to wait a bit for it to get removed or slowly bought. I'd rather see the price recover more, we don't need a huge spike right now.



6. Post 10752938 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

I wonder how many times the words 'bear' and 'whale' have been used in this thread?
February reminds me of October 2013, and then in November it just went crazy. I'm not saying that it will happen, nor that it should, but positive gains are always welcome.



7. Post 10763869 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

I'm very patient, but I've been asking myself a question. When will we breach $300?
We've been under $300 since January 3rd. I'm all for slow gains, but I don't feel like the recovery should be taking ages.



8. Post 10955992 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 01, 2015, 07:38:28 PM
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102549768  Cool
Even though I'm excited about this, I'll believe it when I see it. Just remember the first time that we heard the 'ETF coming soon' and similar stories in that past.
I'm waiting for that to happen. I'm waiting for "the moment".



9. Post 10956415 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 01, 2015, 07:57:46 PM
Even though I'm excited about this, I'll believe it when I see it. Just remember the first time that we heard the 'ETF coming soon' and similar stories in that past.
I'm waiting for that to happen. I'm waiting for "the moment".

Why not? http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GBTC/quote
All they need to do is move those shares...
And Barry is a bit more reliable as Winklevoss twins  Cheesy
Interesting. All I'm saying is that I'd rather wait for them to start trading. I'm quite excited actually.
Hopefully a positive trend will start once this rolls out. Who knows, we might see new highs or then again we might have to endure more months of this boring market.



10. Post 10996987 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 06, 2015, 09:12:57 AM
If BTC gains traction as a kind of linux for financial transactions then $50/$250/$1250 is cheap as peanuts. I know I'm beating on an old drum here but I am baffled by people who always wants ever cheaper coins. One of the few things that can crash this train is if prices go so far down that the infrastructure around BTC crumbles (I know that's an oversimplification of cause/effect, but you get the point). I'm not knocking on Tarmi or other's who wants BTC to "get rekt!", those are entirely consistent in wanting to crash the price.
I think that the community shouldn't be focusing on the price so much right now. We should rather work on getting more people into Bitcoin. The adoption is just not there yet (not talking about merchants). We don't need people hoping on the train when a spike occurs and then jump off. The price can go pretty high easy. If 5M people hold 2 Bitcoin (in addition to the stash that Satoshi has and such) the supply would be much lower than the demand.



11. Post 10997274 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 06, 2015, 10:22:49 AM
Working on getting more people into Bitcoin must involve finding and promoting plausible use cases. I will not recommend buying bitcoins to anyone outside this forum who doesn't understand the risk involved and/or doesn't need it. Purely stating that "If 5M people hold 2 Bitcoin (in addition to the stash that Satoshi has and such) the supply would be much lower than the demand" promotes a pyramid scheme way of thinking, and that is definitely not what we need. Those 5M 500M people should have a real reason to hold buy and use 2/5/10BTC.
I'm not saying that people should be holding. I'm saying that they are. You should look around the forums more. The people around here see Bitcoin as an asset not a currency.
Did I just not say that we should bring more people to Bitcoin?

I've been following the price more closely in the past. The market isn't just as exciting as it used to be. In the last 6 months we've hit $400 only once. I only June/July 2015 would be the same as June/July 2014.



12. Post 10997942 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 06, 2015, 10:39:53 AM
I clearly don't understand your original criticism then. Nor do I understand your reply to my retort.
I guess that I did not express myself correctly. What I've been trying to say here is something that I've been saying for a while now.
People should be less focused on the price. The issues is that people panic easily and only look at Bitcoin in $ or some other currency. Bitcoin will work be it at $1 or $1000. Just look at the infrastructure development that happened in 2014 and that is happening now in 2015.
Don't get my wrong, I'd be glad if the price went up. Although a spike wouldn't be desirable, steady growth is much better.



13. Post 11640870 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: cyclotronmajesty on June 17, 2015, 11:16:13 AM
someone trying to push that price back down.
Says who?

We're still going in the right direction. I'm actually surprised that we're seeing this positive thread right now. Has anyone figured out what is causing this? Greece?

Quote from: klee on June 17, 2015, 11:09:23 AM
Hey, it does not matter even if this does not happen, we gonna rally until Friday either way..
This is still not clear to me. Exactly what is going to happen after Friday?



14. Post 11641539 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: medialab101 on June 17, 2015, 11:25:13 AM
We should't have been in this low range in the first place. If you all recall we were well on the way to breaking back into the 300s when a dark market got hacked and bears used it as an excuse to push the price lower... then we got stuck in this whole 'the sky is falling' block-size debate. I see this as a natural correction that was bound to happen sooner or later.
You're correct. Being under $300 wasn't expected and we have been at this price point for quite some time now. I was actually expecting the block-size debate to cause even more uncertainty, however it looks like the big players aren't wasting their time on the nonsense of the masses.
I think that the market will definitely become more exciting if Greece leaves drops out.  

Another interesting thing is that a lot of markets are seeing a positive trend right now.



15. Post 11646033 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on June 17, 2015, 09:30:12 PM
Reversal confirmed on multiple time frames. But where will this bring us? Back in 230's?
Define confirmed? Confirmed by who; you?
Everything is possible,just as nobody expected the current rise. Even Andreas made a mistake with his prediction. Let's hope that it doesn't come to that.
Besides, if Greece is the cause I hardly doubt that anyone is going to be buying around midnight.



16. Post 11648203 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: cyclotronmajesty on June 18, 2015, 05:17:51 AM
So what do y'all reccomend? Id break even at 250 or so. Should I hold or sell? Chinese Holiday coming this weekend. (I was a little stupid at the top of the wave, should not of tried to get back in after I made my 85$)
Do you have to sell already? This is how most people lose their money and complain. The last time that I've sold any coins was in 2013, just before the price hit $1100.
If the price was really rising due to Greece we should be starting to see a positive trend in the next few hours.



17. Post 11649742 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: nerioseole on June 18, 2015, 09:03:44 AM
Remember that the $1000 spike was a result of Willy!

If you take Willy out of the equation, BTC is on a steady upward slope!
Not entirely Willy but yeah I understand your point. However the first spike in price was not the result of Willy as there was no sign of him back then.

Quote from: Dilla on June 18, 2015, 10:11:28 AM
For real, I've invested an amount I consider already gone. I'm about even now too at this price but I'm not in this to make a couple bucks. I'm looking for a lifestyle change.
Don't sell anything or you're going to regret it. The current price might not look that good, however you never know.
I've actually sold sold 2 BTC at  ~$100 each just 2 months prior to the spike (I had to prove something). I made a huge mistake doing so, didn't I?



18. Post 11653696 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: inca on June 18, 2015, 03:45:06 PM
Not long before the next push upwards..
How can you be sure? I mean I'm hoping that we are going to see some action in the markets, however it seems like we're going to be stuck at $250 for a while.
The market has been boring for quite some time now, it is time for things to change.
Quote from: tarmi on June 18, 2015, 05:30:08 PM
yeah, whales that cornered bfx market are accumulating with hope to push this beyond 266 but they are just adding fuel for the next supernova implosion which will create the deepest black hole you have ever seen.

dont fall in it. there is no way out from it.
No.



19. Post 11666527 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on June 20, 2015, 10:28:50 AM
Is this true?

-snip-
I just waited 3 days to be told this.  My Bank in the UK told me before Bitstamp did that raiffeisen bank are rejecting payments. So lord knows how long i will have to wait before i see my money again.
Simply AVOID Bitstamp. Not worth the hassle.
In the UK i am buying all my bitcoins from Bitbargain. 
Some people are really ignorant and impatient if you ask me. I am going to disregard the possibilities of it being true or false. The problem is not Bitstamp, it is the Raiffeisen Bank. You can't blame Bitstamp for this.

I've always used Bitstamp and have never had a single problem with them.  Please tell me which exchange would reimburse the customers after a hack of 19k BTC?

Back to the price now. I wonder if we could stick to $240 as the bottom now. There is no reason to go back to $220.



20. Post 11669435 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Does anyone believe that we are going to get back above $250 in the next few days? The market was really boring the past few months, and we've finally started to see some action.
However, the volume seems to be down again. On Bitstamp it is only 6.1K BTC.



21. Post 11676164 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on June 20, 2015, 06:24:16 PM
Why should I believe that bro ? Although I want that for sure.
I might ask you a similar question. Why do you believe that the price won't rise?
I've seen and heard different opinions on my situations especially Grexit. Some are saying that it will have a minor impact on Bitcoin or none, while others are saying the exact opposite. Wouldn't their best bet be Bitcoin and/or gold in case that Grexit actually happens?



22. Post 11677058 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on June 21, 2015, 04:39:30 PM
I'm pretty sure the price will rise, and I'm not looking for 6 months, 1 year, or 5 years, my target is a decade from now.

But I always like to add reasons for my arsenal.

Bitcoin can't be considered yet to be a safe heaven, even bitcoin enthusiast can't consider it a safe heaven.

Plus, Greek people are not advanced in the modern IT to know about Bitcoin yet.

Nonsense

Greece doesn't have a strong ultra-liberal movement like the US, nor does it have to bypass the government like in Argentina; yet. Nor is it starved of investment and speculation opportunities like China. There's just no reason for Greece to have a particular interest in Bitcoin, yet. In fact, Argentina is proof that people will acquire the skills if they need them. Plenty of "advanced" countries have less knowledge and less interest in Bitcoin than medium-income Argentina.
A decade from now? That's quite a long period of time and you might not even live to see that day. There's actually a treadmill test that tries to predict this.
Well what would you consider safe heaven now?
I could also argue his last part. Nobody needs to be "advanced" in modern IT to use/know about Bitcoin. It is relatively simple. As far as I know there aren't any laws in Greece that affect Bitcoin yet.
Wouldn't this be a great time for them to buy?



23. Post 11692390 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: chmod755 on June 23, 2015, 11:02:27 AM
gmaxwell said he's going to sell his coins eventually - now here's another one:

Quote
<phantomcircuit> note: i personally will divest entirely before the fork date...
Protesting the fork by threatening to sell off isn't going to work. Bitcoin can live without such individuals.
Quote from: bri912678 on June 23, 2015, 12:43:00 PM
Not sure if this is the right place ask, but what are those dumps all about?  I'm starting to feel a bit uneasy...

I thought the stress test would provoke dumps yesterday and nothing happened. The dumps today might be a delayed reaction to the stress tests. They might have happened anyway, but their timing is quite a coincidence.
I wasn't concerned about it at all. Such tests only prove to be expensive for the people running them. At most there were about 10-12k unconfirmed transactions which isn't even that much. The network has recovered pretty quickly and the price has remained pretty much the same. It looks like we can't find a solid ground above $250 yet.



24. Post 11693157 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: tarmi on June 23, 2015, 01:32:26 PM
selling coins before the fork is not a threat, but common sense.
No, you obviously aren't too familiar with the situation. Once the proposal was rejected and Gavin announced the fork, Maxwell repelled saying that he would probably sell most of his stash and move onto something else. This isn't really related to trading nor a potential price decrease after the fork, thus not common sense.

Quote from: chmod755 on June 23, 2015, 01:45:23 PM
I sure hope they are selling to people who appreciate Bitcoin.
It really depends on the amount of Bitcoins that they own. I doubt that they would instantly sell everything which wouldn't make much sense and they would get less money for their coins.
I think that this might actually be a nice time to buy. This is what some have been preaching for $220-230 but many didn't believe it and here we are now.



25. Post 11695027 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: tarmi on June 23, 2015, 02:37:56 PM
No, you obviously aren't too familiar with the situation. Once the proposal was rejected and Gavin announced the fork, Maxwell repelled saying that he would probably sell most of his stash and move onto something else. This isn't really related to trading nor a potential price decrease after the fork, thus not common sense.
so would mircea and many other early adopters do. so yes, among other things, it is a question related to price.
No it is not. It is related to authority problems and their own issues with Gavin. Just because they don't agree with something, doesn't mean that it is wrong. They can sell everything into my pocket.
I'm accepting an unlimited supply of Bitcoin at a exchange rate of 1BTC = $2. Whoever thinks that Bitcoin is going to crash, or go to zero has a way out with me.  Cheesy


Quote from: hdbuck on June 23, 2015, 02:51:49 PM
Gmax said he would sell sell sell??! cant believe i missed it.. would you have a link??
Well you've missed out on a lot of things then. I can't really find the link right now as some time has already passed.
It was on reddit and was related to the XT fork.



26. Post 11696188 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on June 23, 2015, 07:21:29 PM
Those threats sound like the kid who threatens to hold up his breath until he dies unless mom lets him watch late night TV.

The fork to increase the block size would have been a non-event if the Blockstream guys did not make such a fuss about it.  

It is like they promised their investors that the blocks would fill up next year, or something...
Exactly. It doesn't really seem like a professional way of doing things to me. I don't think that it is going to impact the price too much. Hopefully we are going to see some higher and stable levels soon enough.
I've finally located the link related to Gregory.



27. Post 11700830 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: ejinte on June 23, 2015, 09:47:44 PM
In 48hours we will still be between $240-249. Quote me on this one.
I don't really see a reason for the price to go further down than this. Unless someone actually quickly sells a lot of coins, we shouldn't be moving down at least not for now.
The market has become quiet again, looks like the exciting times are temporarily over.

I'm pretty sure that a lot of people would like to see some action right now, but even in the past 12 hours most of the posting was done by Chartbuddy.



28. Post 11709096 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

I've seen a lot of people speculate that the price will either go up or crash, but it's actually just stayed the same within a $240-$245 range most of the time.
Since most of people usually go on vacation during the summer, I wonder if the market will remain still again. I don't remember the last time that we've had action during summer. Maybe that drop from ~$100 to ~$65 in July 2013?



29. Post 11719656 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

If I had only gotten a dollar for each time someone said 'the next xxx are critical', I'd probably be rich right now. I hardly doubt that we are going to see too much action over the weekend.
I'm pretty sure that some can't wait for Monday to come. I don't think that Grexit will happen, it is more likely that a last minute deal gets signed.

However, I'm still hoping that Greeks realize the potential of Bitcoin on time. This is why people need to be their own bank (just remember Cyprus).



30. Post 11742536 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 29, 2015, 09:16:44 AM

captal-controls and BTC stays more or less the same. thats kind of disappointing tbh.

It was around $240 before Greece basically walked out on negotiations.
Besides, it would be wrong to expect things to happen within an hour, day or so. It just takes time and I'm sure that many Greeks are looking for a way out now.
There is also this:
Quote from: gizmoh on June 29, 2015, 08:08:27 AM
Its heating up on XBT, Already 300,000 shares traded , Record volume to be broken after 1 hour of trading only today .

http://www.nasdaqomxnordic.com/etp/etn/etninfo?Instrument=SSE109538

Institutional investors want BTC Now. BUY!!!

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 29, 2015, 08:48:19 AM
There could be a wave of contagion if Greece exits the eurozone. I'm just watching the news & Greeks are only allowed to take out 60 euro a day. This kind of shit wouldn't happen with BTC. Selfishly the absolute best scenario for us is a collapse of multiple countries in the eurozone.
-snip-
I've just read about it as well and it is horrible. This is why I've been advising people to stay away from banks. The money stored there isn't really yours (remember Cyprus).



31. Post 11746697 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: GaliX on June 29, 2015, 09:26:36 AM
I don't understand what people expect...
I mean imagine if the EU Parliaments gets wind of people avoiding capital control by using bitcoin in a bigger scale... They will make buying Bitcoin illegal asap...
Despite it wouldn't effect Bitcoin itself it would make the price drop below 100$...

Let bitcoin take baby steps and not let it fall and get seriously injured because we are greedy...
The situation is already very heated... They will do everything to safe the euro now.
What's your point here? In that case anyone who bought in time would be the one who has a great benefit.
Bitcoin is just legal in way too many places so far, ruling in favor of it is the right call to make. Any country that has banned it will probably remove that ban eventually.

Besides, you can avoid controls if you cash out and buy into gold. That never made gold illegal, did it?
It's good to see that we're seeing some positive movement again.



32. Post 11749319 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: GaliX on June 29, 2015, 11:08:12 PM
they actually made Gold illegal and therefor forced everybody to sell the gold to the US Treasury in 1934.. Called Gold Reserve Act.

You also can't travel with Gold which isn't declared.

I am not saying it's going to happen tomorrow... But they don't fuck around when it comes to keeping their fiat alive at any price.
That was back in 1934 and in the US alone. I'm pretty sure that the Greeks are trying to find a way out of situation while the price is slowly rising.

I'm just asking myself how come there isn't a Bitcoiner from Greece who should be running conferences or meetings right now in the public? That would definitely help Bitcoin and any Greeks who are interested in buying.



33. Post 11751786 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

I was surprised to wake up to this price. What's more surprising is that I don't see so many pictures of rockets, trains or is everyone still sleeping?
I didn't expect the price to be influenced already, but who knows where this might take us now.
Hopefully we will establish a new bottom at least over $300.



34. Post 11803658 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on July 06, 2015, 12:52:05 PM
274.68 on Stamp. Anybody know what % we're up over the last month or so. Things are looking really bullish at the moment, the pessimist in me just wonders how much longer this will continue. We've been battered for so long, I'm just hesitant to get too hopeful only for us to get dumped on again.

What's pushing this swing in sentiment, it can't just be Greece can it?  
21.91% according to bitcoinwisdom.com
The price was around $225, exactly a month ago (June, 6th). Well I don't know if it is just Greece. The important thing is that the media is reporting  what is going on in Greece and that Greeks are buying Bitcoin (even if they exaggerate it). While it might be a bit late for Greeks (because of the daily withdrawal limit), people in other countries can save themselves.
I wonder where the price will stabilize. With small % of daily growth we can't go wrong. If the price goes too high quickly, someone will probably dump (a lot).

Quote from: cyclotronmajesty on July 06, 2015, 12:06:18 PM
We are going up again. Smiley
Wow! Litecoin +20% on coinmarketcap.Nice pump.
Litecoin has a strong wall at 5 dollars + It's gonna take some force to break... traders seem trepidatious to push through it, but it can be done if slowly I think...
Such growth is not sustainable, especially not coins with weaker infrastructure. It will bounce back, hard.
Note: This isn't a thread about Litecoin.



35. Post 11806052 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

The situation on Bitstamp seems quite interesting. It is quite obvious that someone is trying to prevent the price from rising.

Over 1k dumped there to prevent the price from reaching $280 (it was dangerously close). However, things seem to be looking better than before as the buy side is two times the size of the sell side.

Volume has just passed 25,000 BTC. I don't remember the last time that I had seen that amount on Bitstamp.



36. Post 11840491 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on July 10, 2015, 11:07:54 AM
I'm assuming that's exactly what's happened mate. We need to cross that psychological 300 barrier
FTFY.
I however do not think that $300 is such a significant psychological barrier. Although we have already reached a important level. We have only been at $280+ back in March.
If we reach $315 we will have a new high for the year. I think that it is quite possible.
However, as someone stated the LTC market is not that big to make huge jumps in the price for Bitcoin. We have yet to see it crash and the money flowing back into Bitcoin.



37. Post 11858794 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):



I'm not sure if everyone has seen this, but it looks like the sell side is really weak now. We could easily reach $360 pretty soon. It looks like some events could be unfolding that are going to be very beneficial for Bitcoin. We're only a few bucks away from reaching a new high for the year.
If Greece does leave the Eurozone that might also be beneficial.

Hopefully a few exciting months are ahead of us now.



38. Post 12690828 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: hdbuck on October 15, 2015, 07:12:37 AM
institution much?

135BTC vol: https://bitcoinity.org/markets/list?currency=ALL&span=24h
Just give it time. Did you honestly expect a lot of volume at the start of operations?


I just noticed the price late right now. Is there a specific reason for the mini increase or is it just correcting itself? Very interesting times are ahead.



39. Post 12691321 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: hdbuck on October 15, 2015, 07:31:37 AM
well, they had plenty of time already to acquire 'institutional' clients, since it is not because the website launches that they did not prepared upstream for important users to use the platform, even before any public launch.. anyway.

agree that interesting times lies ahead.

i get this feeling the rest of the financial world, as it obsessively misdirect people into 'blockchain technology' propaganda, is on the edge here and things are accelerating somehow as the end of the year approaches. will their status quo stand a couple more year? hard to say.
I was actually talking about the exchange itself. It takes time to accumulate volume and for the service to mature. I'm just hoping that there are no errors or bugs that would harm them so early. Besides, you have to remember the amount of time it takes to verify an account and transfer money to the exchange.


It would be nice if the price went up even higher.



40. Post 12692049 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: chmod755 on October 15, 2015, 09:36:20 AM
$300+ is unlikely right now. Maybe after the last USMS auction.
Ah yes, I almost forgot about that. I wonder at what price it will get sold. This can have a nice effect because Bitcoin will be in the mainstream media again. I'm not talking above $300 at the moment. Another 5-10$ over the next few days would be nice.

Quote from: poncho32 on October 15, 2015, 10:32:07 AM
A decentralized exchange could do more for Bitcoin than a regulated exchange. I'd rather use a decentralized exchange and trust nobody with my Bitcoins than use some regulated exchange that requires KYC, fingerprint samples, blood samples, and an iris scan just to register. There are masses of people who don't trust the unregulated exchanges, but don't want to go through KYC to use fully regulated ones.
Yes, but what can you do? Unless we had our own (and legal//not made up) country where we would start up such a exchange and whatnot we can't do much (even then others might impose restrictions on it and such). It is what it is. Luckily if you want to avoid everything you can always change to cash.



41. Post 12697363 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Omikifuse on October 15, 2015, 08:00:40 PM
$260 tonight ?!
Probably not.
I concur. I do not believe that it is going to rise that high tonight either. We do not need to be going anywhere too soon either. A small growth pattern over time is the right way in my opinion. The price has been more or less stable in this year (staying in the $200-$300 range, but mostly around $230). This is a good indicator.


The real question is why is this thread so quiet today? We should not be letting ChartBuddy be alone on here.



42. Post 12700964 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

$4.51 up already today on Bitstamp. This is certainly more interesting than yesterday or the day before that. I wonder if the price will be able to hold above $260 or at least $250. It would be nice to move away from $230 (even though there's nothing wrong staying with that either). This is the highest price since mid August.


Quote from: bitebits on October 16, 2015, 11:07:54 AM
I am so conditioned to expect huge dumps after a small rise..
Why?



43. Post 12709180 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

$271.1 at Bitstamp. This was certainly not expected by me. This is great as long as Bitcoin does not lose this value it has gained soon (or ever). Interesting times are certainly ahead of us (finally after a long period).
Now if only Gemini would attract the clients that they are seeking.



44. Post 12712046 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on October 17, 2015, 04:12:01 PM
Prepare for the big price crash. I just bought back in so it should crash down to $200 now.  Undecided
Why is that? $200 seems like too much. I mean, we could see the price drop if that rumor turns out to be false. However, I do not see a drop by such a huge margin. However, what is going to happen if the rumor turns out to be real (+ if media reports that people are buying Bitcoin because of it)?


Quote from: QuestionAuthority on October 17, 2015, 04:26:33 PM
I hope your right. You can pretty much determine how to trade by just doing the opposite of what I do. But I agree it looks like it's going to keep rising. I spent 2k to start and if it goes to 300 I'll do another 2k.
You should be more optimistic, that helps.



45. Post 12713395 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

People really need to stop being ignorant and childish. Every increase in price is not a 'pump' and every decrease is not a 'dump'.

Quote from: ImI on October 17, 2015, 06:45:56 PM
miners have to unload their 3600 coins per day at some point...
Yes.



46. Post 12714835 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):



I didn't see this image around and I felt like this would be the best thread to post it (instead of starting a new thread). Bitcoin was mentioned at the beginning of Dope (movie released in 2015).


@Whoever said that we were crashing: the price is actively fluctuating. We have reached $270 again and came back to $266.91 again on Bitstamp.



47. Post 12734829 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: noobtrader on October 20, 2015, 04:17:41 AM
i think we stuck at 265-270 until christmas  Huh


Not necessarily, but this is still much better than going down again. Let's hope that the price is going to hold a while at around $265. That would definitely be nice for a change.



48. Post 12771647 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

For some unknown reason I see the market depth on Bitstamp on my laptop. It is working on my phone. There's finally some nice support and it looks bigger than the sell side. I wonder if the price even go higher at the moment. It would be really nice if we could stabilize at $300, but I think that it might be too much too soon.

Quote from: Globb0 on October 24, 2015, 10:00:11 AM
They are so tight on everything there and bitcoin is so transparent. I am not sure its so viable. There are even better alternatives such as monero if it has to be e something. But they lack the publicity and adoption of the main coin if you will.
Actually if you're dealing outside of exchanges then there is no need for anything. It's pretty easy to clean your coins on a exchange such as Cryptsy and transfer to an address unknown to everyone. You just need some knowledge and minor technical skills.



49. Post 12804032 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

The sell side is quite weak on Bitstamp, at the moment at least. There's much more support at $250 than there is resistance to $350. Interestingly the price on Bitstamp did reach exactly $300.00 today.


Update:
Corrected my post. Now it makes sense.



50. Post 12808322 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Dexter770221 on October 28, 2015, 09:13:28 AM
Almost 2k CNY, this is crazy....
Doesn't surprise me. People need to start realizing that in e.g. the US you lose 2% of your net worth each year. Bitcoin helps you avoid these things and it has many more benefits besides this one. I wonder how this rally is going to end.



51. Post 12817634 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):


This seems appropriate right now. I was not expecting to see $305+ in the morning.

Quote from: GreekGeek on October 29, 2015, 06:03:20 AM
next big resistance is around 385 (fib level), but I still think  that we will meet heavy resistance up to 330
Depends where you're looking at. The sell side has more pressure now on Bitstamp and there is also this ~2k wall at $310:



Update: That's not the point.



52. Post 12819302 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: koryu on October 29, 2015, 08:19:10 AM
completely different in china, asks down bids up: http://data.bitcoinity.org/markets/bidask_sum/30d/CNY/btcchina?bp=50&bu=c&r=hour&t=m

highest bidsum since 30 days and lowest asksum since 30 days
Thank you for the link. This is what I'm talking about. Someone is trying to prevent the price from going up at Bitstamp. It should go up since China is leading forward; these exchanges have to catch up.

Quote from: dre1982 on October 29, 2015, 10:56:41 AM
@Bitstamp they are eating the 2000+ BTC wall at $310. 1255 BTC left.
There are still ~1.4k coins there. Let's see if it can be eaten.



53. Post 12819494 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: premium_domainer on October 29, 2015, 11:32:39 AM
Are you guys mentally retarded?  The federal govt can just print money out of thin air anytime they want, yet you believe they're going to pump Bitcoin for some meaningless auction for a trivial amount of money?
I thought the same. China market is only the reason for this bump.
Correct. People need to get informed about the "magic making machine" in the US. They can (and they have) print money out of thin air. I'd say that the EU tax ruling is also a contributing factor. It is now tax free after all (to a cetain degree).



54. Post 12822945 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

People need to stop talking about altcoins (e.g. Litecoin) here. This is not a altcoin observer thread. Also, if you don't panic you will never be at a loss. Eventually the price will go back to the point at which you bought or it will go higher.


Only ~3k Bitcoins to $350 at Bitstamp.



55. Post 12830928 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

What's wrong with people here? If the price returns back from green (e.g. $10) into a daily green of e.g. $2 you'e trying to tell me that it is going down by $100? If anything, this rise is very similar to that one in late 2013. You can easily see this at Bitstamp (note: I'm not saying that it will follow the same pattern). Stop with the trolling and pointless observations.




Quote from: Nimbulan on October 30, 2015, 12:40:41 PM
we should get ready for landing to about 250 each
No.



56. Post 12831146 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: pleaseexplainagain on October 30, 2015, 12:56:38 PM
my reading of late 2013 was that the willy bot massively bubbled the price to about $1000 and when it popped it went all the way down to $177 over about 12 months. seems to me then low $200 after this one is actually optimistic.
unless there is new demand and not just new speculators it has to pop at some point  
There is no real evidence of this, and there probably never is going to be. Willy was a contributing factor of the rise, not the main or sole one.

Quote from: r0ach on October 30, 2015, 12:50:31 PM
It's all the idiots who were full fiat and 0 coins and were waiting for "the bottom" to go all in for momentum trade but it went up without them.  
-snip-
If I had to guess what would happen in the next 48 hours, I give it 50% chance China and the US meet at $325 and go sideways, and 50% chance China keeps pushing to god knows wherever they are going.
Apparently. Just because the price is correcting itself, that does not mean that we're crashing. People around here are acting more than childish. This part needs more cleaning.

Quote from: madmat on October 30, 2015, 12:57:38 PM
Okcoin is broken!!!  Shocked Shocked Shocked  Cool
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/okcoin/btccny
Obvious manipulation. Nothing special, nor surprising.



57. Post 12862423 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Bullstamp $359.




58. Post 12862494 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Sell side very weak now. Less than 2.5k coins to $420+. Are we going to hit a new high on Bitstamp?



59. Post 12862599 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Wolf Rainer on November 02, 2015, 09:46:44 PM
Bitstamp.net down?
No, it is not. Working for me at the moment. The price is ~$364.



60. Post 12874662 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Bitcoin is back.


Refreshing every 2 seconds.



61. Post 12945160 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: barbs on November 11, 2015, 07:40:21 AM
What gets me is just how brazen and rude it is
Rational people just roll their eyes when Bitcoin goes up and they're alway right
Not really. It's pretty simple; as soon as the demand becomes greater than the supply we're going up. This is just natural and I'm eager to see what is going to happen near and after the halving. Didn't the price always fluctuate (mostly towards down) after the Bitcoin auctions? Both sides are pretty weak depending on where you look. It could go either way anytime (although staying at $300 would be good).


Quote from: Feri22 on November 11, 2015, 08:07:39 AM
The rise was too sharp and too fast, that's true...but i still thought we will survive the 350 support...
What support? There was none at Bitstamp.



62. Post 12945216 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Tstar on November 11, 2015, 08:09:34 AM
Don't get me wrong: I do not want to compare BTC to LTC but as far as I remember the LTC halving didn't have much impact on LTC prices.
I'm not saying that it will be the same thing with BTC but it seems to me there are other things, much more powerful, that can shake the BTC trading for the good or the bad. So far what I've seen always happening is that when chinese buy, volume and price tend to the sky
I don't think that it can be compared to Litecoin because of the massive size of the Bitcoin ecosystem which is not present with LTC. Actually it doesn't even come close. You do have a point, that other factors tend to be very deciding for the price. Although in order to make a guess, you'd have to look back at 2012. What kind of ecosystem did Bitcoin have then; what effect did the halving have? Something has to happen, else we lose some security as miners drop out.



63. Post 13020759 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on November 20, 2015, 08:16:26 AM

The problem is they probably won't hear it because the actual reason to limit bitcoin usage has nothing to do with IS or terrorists.

...?
You're new here. What brand of conspiracy theorist are you?
He's right though. Bitcoin is a danger to the existence of the important capitalists. It has barely anything to do with terrorist funding, especially compared to cash.



64. Post 13103039 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: r0ach on November 29, 2015, 03:30:33 PM
Not my fault the mods have done nothing to stop..
-snip-
The moderators can't stop anyone from doing anything. The moderator can only act after someone has already done something. You should not complain but rather put more effort into reporting these posts. I have not seen a single report on any user so far (i.e. these off-topic accounts created only to spam here).

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 29, 2015, 04:44:19 PM
its really to bad, this thread as fun and very informative when it wasn't being spammed to hell.
Just report and we'll handle it.


I wasn't looking into this thread for a while. However, the recent price bump definitely helped me snatch more deals on Black Friday.



65. Post 13103148 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: oda.krell on November 29, 2015, 05:19:43 PM
I know the speculation subforum isn't exactly, well, universally loved among all older members and staff, but it's good to see mods are keeping an eye on it anyway. Thanks.
I occasionally come to this thread to read; rarely post here though (sometimes pro Bitcoin gifs or something for fun and relaxation). As I've already said, the problem isn't lack of moderation it is the lack of reports. I'm usually looking at 0 reports because we tend to handle them fairly quickly. Even when moderators read various threads while "looking" for work, I doubt that someone would want to waste time on this thread because it often has nonsense in it. As long as you guys keep on reporting, we can keep on cleaning.


Is a rise being expected within December or do we stay steady around the current price range? I'd rather have it sit still in order to get even more before the start of the next year.



66. Post 13279446 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

It would be nice if the price closed at this price level for 2015. 2016 is definitely going to be more exciting than this year was. Due to the huge amount of posts here and me being to unable so much time into the thread, could someone share some information directly (price changes that are expected)? It would be very appreciated.



67. Post 13298469 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Wekkel on December 19, 2015, 02:16:18 PM
Next 24hrs are critical.
It seems that someone says the same thing every now and then. The price looks good at the moment.



68. Post 13299922 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: redsn0w on December 19, 2015, 04:32:26 PM
You are right... at the moment  Grin !
Sometimes the ride down on a roller coaster isn't as bad as people say that it is. I wouldn't mind testing a new ground level and then going back up again.

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on December 19, 2015, 04:40:18 PM
We get bored sometimes...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jq57BjBVq7o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Di5NSU5yuKE&index=28&list=PLRpfyk85ujK0jQg6O3FiyO001O2VACbqr
Yeah I can see that. I actually like the first song as well. We need more songs like that one.



69. Post 13558728 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on January 15, 2016, 08:53:23 AM
100% filled block and price on the downside, not a good morning for me at the moment.
I need some coffee to wake up and analyze WTF happened tonight
It has nothing to do with a few full blocks; actually that doesn't ever impact the price. This was caused by Hearn who should be listed as one of the worst people that were ever in the Bitcoin ecosystem & Cryptsy. Hearn basically declared Bitcoin as dead/dying and the media caught it, a fine exaple of a evil and backstabbing person.



70. Post 13558985 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: flagpara on January 15, 2016, 09:55:41 AM
Can't he say what he thinks?
I don't see anything wrong in what he's saying. BTC is really shady he's right on that. Users don't have any correct informations you can't deny that.
So after spending countless years of his life working with Bitcoin, a few months after his departure Bitcoin is dead? Please.  Roll Eyes If you defend such a person you are not any better than him. Bitcoin is not that shady, especially not since there's no Silk Road equivalent. Stop your gibberish.

Quote from: flagpara on January 15, 2016, 09:55:41 AM
I don't understand the hate, he's someone who worked on btc and thinks it's a failure and warned people about it, is it a reason to hate him?
Because he's a paid bulldog who backstabbed the community with this article. Should we love him for it?  Roll Eyes

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 15, 2016, 09:50:12 AM
not really news ... we already knew hearn is a bitcoin hater and saboteur, except for the NYTimes readers who will no doubt lap up Hucksters Hearn's soundbites for the sheeple
That is the problem of this story, NYTimes and the sheep that are going to believe this nonsense or defend him. It has already reflected itself on the price (incl. news about Cryptsy).


Update:
It is only logical for you to not know anything, but know that Hearn isn't bad. This makes sense.



71. Post 13560901 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: a7mos on January 15, 2016, 01:21:47 PM
After 400 level is broken, i believe we will see much more less prices

I hope that these wave of frightening news will end soon !

bitcoin will not die because one devolepor abandoned it !
Stop this panicking as soon as the price goes down a little bit. Less than 3 months ago we were are around ~250$. People need to calm down.

Quote from: Elwar on January 15, 2016, 01:25:38 PM
Glad I paid for my cruise when the price was over $450.
I had a similar situation.

Quote from: equipoise on January 15, 2016, 01:36:10 PM
Do you see the small blocks shit now? Many were withholding the Bitcoin network capacity intentionally without any valid reasoning. It was obvious and inevitable and this is just the beginning. When the block size is increased after the big drop which just started then the fungibility problem will come - most probably with a big delay again to let the price stabilize and rise before the new big drop.
No. This has nothing to do with the block size.



72. Post 13561110 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: fisheater22 on January 15, 2016, 01:42:53 PM
SFYL

Gud buye, 390...
If you invest nothing you can lose nothing. I'm not at a loss and mathematically I can not ever be.

Quote from: julian071 on January 15, 2016, 01:46:54 PM
Europe leading the way in the dumpage... Cheap coins for all the people left who believe in BTC!
Pretty much anyone with a working brain?

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on January 15, 2016, 01:48:46 PM
This has turned quite ugly  Undecided
What are the odds of R3 giving Hearn a financial incentive for the announcement in addition to this happening at the same time as Cryptsy closes its doors? I'll let you think about that one.


Everyone just calm down. It just went up $10 within a second and back down a few dollars again. This means nothing.



73. Post 13567192 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

You know the media has caught up on the story and barely any reported the story correctly as in "Mike is wrong and Bitcoin died 80+ times already". I've got sent a few screenshots from Facebook (which I don't use) from a few partners already. Quite unfortunate that it has reflected itself this heavily on the price within a single day.



74. Post 13567437 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: becoin on January 16, 2016, 12:22:19 AM
Drama queen or not, he had some valid points - not necessary technically, but about the whole deadlock situation and censorship.
People that are censored don't get featured in NYT articles and mentioned in R3 testimony broadcasted by every tv channel, bud!
He was wrong on most of his 'technical' points anyways or they were misinterpretations of the reality. Do not trust that guy, especially not after this. He could have been the inside man all along.

Quote from: ImI on January 16, 2016, 12:07:34 AM
He sold himself to the media as one important (if not the most important) developer. Which is a fucking joke! Yes he did some work but i wouldnt name him in the Top10. Hilarious that he could make such an public impression...
I'm leaning towards making a public list of shame where names such as Hearn and Karpeles would come up with explanations to what they did (possibly even a rating mechanism). They sure deserve it.



75. Post 13567535 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AZwarel on January 16, 2016, 12:37:16 AM
I do not want to be rude, or anything, but this is not a religion. There can be no heretics. And if a single person, with a single article can hurt "this much", maybe the system ain't that strong enough after all- yet?

Never understood why would anyone follow a "leader" here, and strangle the kitten of the "other tribe's warchief". This is so stone age, and explains why still no consensus, hint hint.
What are you talking about? This has nothing to do with the system. The system is unharmed and the maths behind it are impenetrable (in the todays world). This is about the sheep of this world and the corrupt media. Most of the media quickly picked up on this as the ultimate truth even though Hearns words have no meaning anymore and are backed by nothing but bias and rage (due to the failure of his project). I'm quite annoyed and tired of this constant nonsense. These people need to be shamed for all eternity.

Quote from: pleaseexplainagain on January 16, 2016, 12:42:02 AM
any big change in price is not so much due to one person - a hearn or karpeles- or one thing - scaling issues though they be trigger points but simply pumping and then drops.
This is wrong. Have you not been watching the news? This is spreading everywhere like a wildfire.



76. Post 13567636 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AZwarel on January 16, 2016, 12:48:53 AM
The media is corrupt for decades, so why the surprise? It doesn't matter how impenetrable the math is. It did not matter for the people in the age of Galileo either. In practice, only the subjective valuation of the people, which matters. Hm, i think i have just actually proved Your point :-D
I understand that. The problem is that we're lacking the resources to fight back or aren't properly doing so (with our 'own media'). The sheep needs to be pointed to the right direction.

Quote from: fisheater22 on January 16, 2016, 12:51:04 AM
So Lauda, how much code have you contributed to Bitcoin? How long have you been involved with it?
In short, what makes you the authority on Bitcoin, as opposed to Mike?
The amount of my contributions are irrelevant nor would I disclose my contributions; not to you nor anyone else at this moment. I'm not an authority; I'm just someone who's trying to help Bitcoin and certainly not someone who was bought off by banks and backstabbed everyone. Stop defending him, he does not deserve it.



77. Post 13567746 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 16, 2016, 01:08:33 AM
"Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people."
Yes, that quote was more of a general principle of how people should live their lives. It does not imply that strong minds never discuss events nor people else that would be a logical fallacy (faulty generalization). You would know that if you paid attention or went to the right classes instead of trying to stab me in the back (if that is the case since people have attempted that in the past; otherwise I apologize for my assumptions). In times like these you have to fight them with their own methods, else you lose. A public shame list would not result in 'weak minds discussing people' which is not what was meant with that quote.


The price seems to have somewhat recovered. Huobi seems to be temporarily closed.


Update:
Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 16, 2016, 01:18:33 AM
I'm just pointing out that you are losing your cool. I thought you might want to know that.
I'm not and I've explained why. People seem to misunderstand this quote with a logical fallacy. I'm just getting tired and will not passively stand aside and watch this.



78. Post 14053766 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on February 29, 2016, 10:35:20 PM
Bitcoin is under attack, and I'm not sure you see it as your salary probably is dependent on this very state.

it startes with this PR war.
Correct. The sudden influx of transactions today means that somebody is trying 'to make' Gavin look like his prediction was accurate when it fact it wasn't. There is a claim from 'experts' (albeit exact information not available I think) from the roundtable that only 40% of the blocks are actually full (if you exclude the spam). The mempool was ~1.5k 2 days ago (this says a lot). However, it also seems like the price doesn't really care.



79. Post 14990058 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):



I was told by certain HF supporters that Bitcoin is dead and ETH is the next leading cryptocurrency  Huh  Roll Eyes



80. Post 14996975 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Lauda's cat is prepared.


Quote from: Cryptoadvice_82 on May 28, 2016, 08:13:46 AM
If we hold over 500 expect to see 600+ before the end of next week...china is pumping now!  Grin
It is already at ~545$ over there.



81. Post 15003150 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Opening up Bitstamp and seeing $508 results in:




Now if you take a closer look over there, there's only ~1.4k coins till $600 and a 'mini-wall' at $500:



82. Post 15180916 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: DaRude on June 12, 2016, 08:27:41 PM
Running out of coins across exchanges  Cheesy

OKCoin only has BTC1890 left till 4780, whoboi BTC4185, finex BTC5400 to 720
Since you've chosen to leave Bitstamp out, then I might as well post this:
Quote
Bitstamp | There are currently 1715.5173 bitcoins offered at or under 900.0 USD, worth 1227774.40906 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0695 seconds
Seems like the amount of coins available is low everywhere.



83. Post 16820629 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

I didn't respond to this thread in a long time, although I read it quite frequently. I've been hearing 'Gold & Bitcoin up' on a few (live) news coverage in response to the situation in America. Has the time come? I have to re-post my favorite gif. in response to the rising price.




84. Post 16901298 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: AZwarel on November 17, 2016, 05:28:47 AM
Also, wow 757$ on finex, are these people never sleep? Smiley
You're looking at the wrong places tonight: 58552.5 Indian Rupees per Bitcoin on Unocoin. This equals to:




85. Post 16912971 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Please discuss development related stuff elsewhere, this thread and the section should primarily be about price talk. There is a Segwit thread in this very sub-forum.

Quote from: Elwar on November 18, 2016, 09:45:17 AM
$750 wall on Bitstamp being eaten up.
Does Bitstamp even have enough liquidity for real *walls*? Bitstamp deserves more credit considering that they are the only exchange at which people did not lose money due to a *hack* IIRC.



86. Post 17119750 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Has anyone seen this, i.e. the Bitcoin Megabull Cycle prediction? Cheesy

Quote from: toknormal on December 08, 2016, 01:52:06 PM
Anyone noticed the increase in hashrate this year ?

Incredible.
This website has a better overview.

Quote
Dec 31 2015   103,880,340,815   11.16%   743,604,444 GH/s
.....
Dec 02 2016   286,765,766,821   1.76%   2,052,749,317 GH/s
~176% increase.



87. Post 17224876 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: notme on December 18, 2016, 07:22:25 PM
I can confirm that I also had two posts discussing segwit deleted from this thread on the 25th.  I wasn't even discouraging it, just trying to explain some of the opinions I've heard over on that other forum.  We will never be able to reach consensus if discussion is not allowed.
How about you start actually following the forum rules? You're discussing solutions on a technical basis which has nothing to do with this thread, nor this section (you should try to remain on-topic whenever possible, even when just posting images). I have tried keeping such discussion, regardless of whether positive or negative, and Segwit/BU/whatever out of this thread. At times, this thread feels like kindergarten.

Regarding the poll: I have removed it as it was really outdated. There is no way to add one as a moderator AFAIK (which is unfortunate since OP's account is inactive). I'll talk to the administrators to see whether there are any options to get this rolling.



88. Post 17224989 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: notme on December 18, 2016, 07:38:16 PM
Yet, all of the anti-semitic hate speech is just fine.
I can not keep track of each such post, which is off-topic here (but not against the rules AFAIK). I have also reported at least 1 person for constantly posting off-topic replies in regards to that. However, I can not issue bans for higher ranking members so this is not up to me. You can complain about individuals to certain global moderators (e.g. hilariousandco) and the administrators (Cyrus is your best call).

Quote from: notme on December 18, 2016, 07:38:16 PM
I just don't understand how the issues surrounding the scalability of bitcoin are off topic, particularly in this lounge-esque thread.
Read:


If you want to discuss Segwit or other technical stuff, then 'Bitcoin Discussion' is more appropriate for this kind of discussion (other sections may be as well, but the thread would be moved to the right one in that case). Also keep in mind that I can not keep reading all of the posts made here, thus please use the report function.

Quote from: Holliday on December 18, 2016, 07:40:36 PM
So what? I've had just as many posts, speaking out against big blocks, deleted from this thread. It has nothing to do with big/small blocks and everything to do with being off-topic. Pretty much all of my posts that have received moderation over the years come from the wall observer thread. It's nothing new.
I have tried to keep an equal and impartial moderation stance (regardless of my views) as much as possible. Keep in mind that I'm not the only moderator who can delete posts here (before someone jumps to any conclusion with specific examples).

Discussing the price effect of either Segwit/BU/other would be on-topic, although it would likely also spiral into off-topic really quickly.



89. Post 17225107 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: notme on December 18, 2016, 07:53:23 PM
I disagree that bitcoin price exists as an isolated thing.  Sure, TA and chart patterns have an influence, but fundamentals matter as well.  Sentiment regarding different scaling solutions effects general market sentiment.
Did I say it was an isolated thing? I have not. Discussing the technical aspects of certain solutions has zero business being in this section. If you have a problem with the way that sections are set up or with the forum rules, then you are complaining in the wrong place. This thread is not a chat-box, and you can't post whatever you want, wherever you want it. This applies forum-wide.

Quote from: notme on December 18, 2016, 07:53:23 PM
Additionally, censoring such discussion only contributes to the myth that moderators here are unfairly targeting big blockers.
As confirmed by Holliday, both sides get deleted because they are off-topic (not because of the content).

Quote from: kurious on December 18, 2016, 07:55:03 PM
Forgive me if I misunderstand, but may I ask why discussion of Segwit is not allowed?

Surely it does affect the future price of Bitcoin, which is a topic that I would have thought falls within the bounds of the 'price movement tracking & discussion' contained in the title of this thread.
Read the small update here:
Quote from: Lauda on December 18, 2016, 07:44:04 PM
Discussing the price effect of either Segwit/BU/other would be on-topic, although it would likely also spiral into off-topic really quickly.
These posts would remain and hopefully not go sideaways too much.



90. Post 17225746 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: yefi on December 18, 2016, 08:29:33 PM
But think of the time you could save yourself every day from having to moderate >320,000 posts?  Cheesy
True. However, keep in mind that:
1) I wouldn't be doing my 'job' then. Embarrassed
2) If I close an eye on 1 thread, the only fair/equal action is to do the same for all threads. Suddenly you get people talking everywhere about everything.

This cat can handle it for now (mostly posts that were created after I started moderating here though).

Quote from: bitebits on December 18, 2016, 08:54:55 PM
When you delete a post, you should state why it has been deleted to the respective poster.
That's just not feasible and not how things currently work. You get an automated response which tells you that it's likely an off-topic post.

I do miss the train/rocket pictures. You need to step up your game!



91. Post 17250613 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: ImI on December 21, 2016, 03:30:38 AM
remember how they wrote "bulltards" nearly every minute in this thread as we went from 200 to 220?  Grin
You mean the failed bot attempts that ranged from $200 -> 20$ to everything up to late $700 -> $70? They must be probably drinking somewhere in despair. Never forget:




92. Post 17261609 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Is it time for some FOMO? The spammer in this section seems to have stopped for now.




93. Post 17273259 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on December 23, 2016, 06:44:30 AM
Wow, did not expect to wake up to this...
Exactly my thought. I was expecting it either to stabilize at $860 or fall down a bit over the last 10 hours. Where is the next stop for this rocket?




94. Post 17273402 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on December 23, 2016, 07:46:08 AM
955
What makes you say that?

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 23, 2016, 07:47:40 AM
Exactly...  I have had to revise my thinking, too because I was fairly certain that either the move between $800 and $900 was going to be slower  or that there was going to be some considerable correction within that that price range - especially since the status of bitcoin still remains without any kind of meaningful or significant price correction since about August...

I have some tentative ideas, but I am really afraid to say them because I am just likely to be proven wrong or someone who has no fucking clue.   Cheesy Cheesy  I suppose, nothing wrong with that when we seem to have continued upwards price movement.   Wink
I think that Bitcoin can be used as prime proof of a market being irrational. However, not irrational in a sense that it shouldn't be increasing in value / moving upwards, but the timing and amount it moves usually catches most people by surprise.



95. Post 17314341 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

It's time for this image again. All aboard the rocket to $1000.




96. Post 17325519 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: 600watt on December 28, 2016, 01:22:13 PM
What is the ATH in yuan?
8k
Looks about right, considering that at the current exchange rate 8000 CNY is ~1150$.



The Speculation spammer looks like he/she is in panic mode. Roll Eyes



97. Post 17341238 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on December 29, 2016, 07:51:04 PM
Lauda must be taking an extended lunch break. He's been overworked lately. Someone buy the man a stimulating beverage.  Smiley
_____

edit: Gone already, thanx Lauda.
It's become a strong rally indicator.
Indeed, as if we needed another.

Just the fact that every time lately that they try  to knock it down and cause a panic dump, it fails and the price bounces back up, is a strong rally indicator.
I think that the user or group in question is actually panicking at this point. The spam frequency keeps increasing the closer Bitcoin gets to breaking $1000. We are trying our best, and you're welcome!

In the meantime, I'm still positive regarding the stability on Bitstamp above $960. I actually would prefer it to stabilize a bit before spiking again, but you never know with Bitcoin.



98. Post 17365948 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: abstract1 on January 01, 2017, 08:12:44 PM
C'mon guys lets get pumped: https://youtu.be/I14b-C67EXY?t=12s
You're linking the wrong video. There's a version created solely for hitting $1000: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkmxRR9b3QA




99. Post 17375759 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Who is leading this 'dump'? It would be nice to see 1000$ hold.



100. Post 17377881 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on January 02, 2017, 08:16:46 PM
Bearstamp has overtaken bitfinex in volume (according to bitcoinity) now a dump's started. But coinmarketcap contradicts that by showing bitfinex has twice the 24 hour volume of bearstamp.

China can't be leading it because its volume dropped since it went to sleep.
So what exactly happened with it? Was this a bear trap? I saw it quickly bounce back up on my mobile price tracker. I've already mentioned that I'd prefer stability at $950 levels elsewhere, so the same can be said for $1000+. The rocket could wait for a while to fully refuel.



101. Post 17388528 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: gizmoh on January 03, 2017, 09:37:27 AM
Updated chart  Cool


Thank you! I have always liked this gif, and one can now easily find it on Viber (first result if one uses "@GIPHY bitcoin price"). I've uploaded the updated version to Giphy.

Quote from: machasm on January 04, 2017, 12:46:42 AM
And yet more mainstream news
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38495804
Stabilization above $1000 is showing an even a bigger bullish trend? I am not selling. Anything.



102. Post 17392615 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Lauda on January 04, 2017, 12:52:38 AM
Stabilization above $1000 is showing an even a bigger bullish trend? I am not selling. Anything.
It looks like I was right. I'm still not selling. As we approach the $1100 price point on the western exchanges, it is time to post my favorite gif again:




103. Post 17394672 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Someone is trying to stop this rally:



https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/okcoin/btccny



104. Post 17404955 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Jhanzo on January 05, 2017, 09:25:01 AM
Holy fuck what happened at finex just now?


Dump? Shorting? Time to run?




105. Post 17407872 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: WoJJ78 on January 05, 2017, 02:06:23 PM
Heard coinbase got hacked?

https://community.coinbase.com/t/coinbase-was-hacked-and-they-are-lying-about-the-situation/13187/6
That's just speculation at this point. Please stop spreading false information. Let's wait for some actual information from Coinbase; a lot of exchanges are having trouble keeping up with this demand.

Reposting again (as predicted earlier):


Volume is through the roof. Coinmarketcap shows almost $450 Million.



106. Post 17408021 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: mixan on January 05, 2017, 02:17:39 PM
But then some mod moved it to "Web wallets" when I originally posted it as a question in technical support. Then it would of been known before this price drop had happened.
You have posted it in the wrong section.

Quote from: WoJJ78 on January 05, 2017, 02:16:23 PM
Fair enough. I was just wondering if this were false or true.
There is no information as far as I'm aware. Spreading that link will just cause further (unbased) panic.

Back to thread:
Quote from: Ted E. Bare on January 05, 2017, 02:13:54 PM
I like roller coasters.
That's pretty much how today has been. I'm still unsure what caused the 1 minute drop from $1100 to ~$900. Bitfinex seems to have unusually high volume.



107. Post 17418163 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

As per someone on reddit making a post, it's time to stop this bumpy ride. It's quite unusual to go for a nap and to see 5-10% price swings in either direction. At this point I miss some of the previous stability. The volume is still unusually high at over $450 Million for the last 24 hours.




108. Post 17439970 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: kurious on January 08, 2017, 01:05:43 PM
Stamps books look thin on both sides.   1000 BTC dump takes us down to the mid 800s, the same as a buy is way up in the mid 900s.

Which way, I have no idea - but it doesn't look that bullish to me.   Am all fiat on Stamp, waiting to see what happens.
Are you sure that you've updated your charts? Someone placed a wall at 900 right now:



Quote
Bitstamp | There are currently 4213.2586 bitcoins demanded at or over 800.0 USD, worth 3640500.55521 USD in total. | Data vintage: 49.0603 seconds
Bitstamp | There are currently 3327.3893 bitcoins offered at or under 1000.0 USD, worth 3202731.91053 USD in total. | Data vintage: 75.3432 seconds

Update: It was just removed.



109. Post 17776996 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

How many times has China banned Bitcoin? Cheesy

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 08, 2017, 09:44:35 AM
It's pretty clear by now that PBOC is manipulating the market.
Since when are minor price movements in either direction equal to market manipulation?



110. Post 17790454 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Here we go again. China.  Roll Eyes

Quote from: bitcoinvest on February 09, 2017, 01:43:17 PM
wow....this was really deep.... and i still wonder if we reached the bottom or we have more because if this ban is real then we have big problem i think...
No, we do not.



111. Post 17790871 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

$970. Save yourselves!




112. Post 17791024 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: bitcoinvest on February 09, 2017, 02:24:04 PM
$970. Save yourselves!



This is so true this moment.....
Be prepared for the second dump....i had a long time to live moments like this one when i had the second monitor on the exchange ! lucky for me i sold before.. wow as i write i see 5 euro per second down!
$960 is breaking. I guess the next stop is $920.

Quote from: MinermanNC on February 09, 2017, 02:26:14 PM
Alright now, this is really starting to hurt.  Angry
I said save yourselves.



113. Post 17791405 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Ideas on what's next? I called the dip just a few minutes before it happened. It went down to $910-920 on Bitstamp within seconds. Is it over yet, or are we going to see more action once China wakes up? Cheesy



114. Post 17791498 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: podyx on February 09, 2017, 02:59:51 PM
With the PBOC announcement, if you don't think it will go down further you are delusional.
How serious is it? Chinese exchanges couldn't withdraw bitcoin right?
Basically you can buy BTC/LTC but you can't withdraw any of it. You can only withdraw fiat. This should create even more sell pressure.



115. Post 17791819 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: droizs on February 09, 2017, 03:18:06 PM
BTC was rising too fast with no proper reasoning, this is the proper setback.
Nonsense as always. Have you been watching the network security lately? Hashrate 6 months ago was almost 1/2 of what it is now.

Quote from: slap on February 09, 2017, 03:22:39 PM
Flash to 700 then slowly to my 300 target?
Last rise i had predicted was an exit pump.
300!? wut. Even 700 sounds too low. But what do I know...
Sell before you're left holding the bags. Cheesy



116. Post 17792120 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: pinger on February 09, 2017, 03:41:19 PM
Panic buy!!!
Looks like someone wants to be a bag holder once China wakes up? Cheesy

Minor reversal, but downtrend has yet to begin.



117. Post 17792426 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: jackjack on February 09, 2017, 04:03:10 PM
It's only midnight there and they were awake 3h ago when this happened
Why would they sell more, and why would they sell at all?
Why would you go to a store to buy goods which you can't take out of the store? Makes perfect sense.



118. Post 17794618 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: rokkyroad on February 09, 2017, 07:25:38 PM
I love this thread. Rule of thumb. When the consensus is yelling "hodl", sell. When they yell "sell", hodl.
Or when I tell you to sell, you end up holding the bags? Cheesy Let me quote myself again:

Quote from: Lauda on February 09, 2017, 02:19:11 PM
$970 $950. Save yourselves!





119. Post 17803515 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: d5000 on February 10, 2017, 02:06:31 PM
This morning I thought: "Oh, the price evolution seems fairly stable after the dump. It could be even bullish. And there was no second Chinese dump."

But now I see the micro-uptrends are weaker every time - like outlined in the "Three dead kitten theory". So unfortunately I expect another dump coming in, probably this weekend. 850 is approximately the value where a reversal back to bullish territory could happen, but it could also go as low as 735-780 again.
Why the pessimism today? Most people get terrified when you mention the 800 range, and now you're telling them 700? Tongue

Quote from: lemmyK on February 10, 2017, 02:00:27 PM
Where is that circlejerk jinglunag  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/830047626414477312
I'm not sure what exact relevance this tweet has to this thread? Cheesy



120. Post 17812297 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):



There's a great website to watch the price move up and down along with the roller-coaster guy: https://rollercoasterguy.github.io/



121. Post 17824967 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: GBattaglia on February 12, 2017, 01:02:09 PM
Now we all know that even if a fraction [say 1/4] of those coins were all sold off; the price would drop drastically.
Try selling 1/4 of the total stock of a company and see what would happen with it's market price.  Roll Eyes

Quote from: GBattaglia on February 12, 2017, 01:02:09 PM
Bitcoin is chump change in the grand scheme of things.
That's just another sign of the underlying potential (price wise).

Quote from: bitcoinvest on February 12, 2017, 12:57:45 PM
was is the lesson we can have if ETF gets approved? that little time before that the price was manipulated to buy some cheap coins and after sell 2 times more about, if not more.
You should just remain patient.



122. Post 17825159 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: GBattaglia on February 12, 2017, 01:26:02 PM
Yeah, a company sell off should have the same thing as Bitcoin's market cap. The problem is Bitcoin is not a company but is supposed to be looked at as a currency. Most people look at the $16Billion market cap and think that is the real worth of all Bitcoin in circulation, when in reality it is probably half that value as shown by the little break down I just did.
Try selling off 1/4 Dollars into metal and other currencies and see what happens. This perspective is really weird and unnecessary IMO.

Quote from: GBattaglia on February 12, 2017, 01:11:26 PM
Grand total market cap with these numbers of sell off depreciation: $9.2Billion. About the cost of buying a small failing smartphone manufacturer [Nokia].
Why the market cap rush? It's obviously severely undervalued considering what it offers.



123. Post 17825411 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: GBattaglia on February 12, 2017, 01:40:25 PM
Is it really severely undervalued? Look at my post above with the transaction bandwidth edit. How is Bitcoin severely undervalued without diving into speculative growth? Bitcoin's primary draw is as an investment tool for speculation. How many of you here regularly use Bitcoin as a currency to buy and sell goods for?
Bitcoin isn't just a currency, and that's the whole point of it. If you think that this is all there is to it, then you don't truly understand where the underlying value stems from. How many people regularly use Gold in a similar fashion?



124. Post 17869321 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

China bans Bitcoin on BTCC again?  Cheesy

Quote
Dear Customer, BTCChina will continue upgrading its inspection and verification system for bitcoin and litecoin withdrawals to aggressively guard against money laundering, illegal money exchange, pyramid schemes, and other illegal activity. As a result, bitcoin and litecoin withdrawals will be suspended from February 15th until March 15th. Bitcoin and litecoin withdrawals will be resumed as soon as industry standards are settled and the inspection and verification system has been upgraded. Please note: 1. Bitcoin and litecoin withdrawals will resume as soon the inspection and verification system has been upgraded. We will let customers know as soon as this happens. 2. CNY deposits and withdrawals will not be affected; if customers want to withdraw funds within a shorter period, they can first trade their bitcoins and litecoins for CNY on the exchange and then withdraw the CNY. We apologize for any inconvenience caused. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding, The BTCChina Team February 15th, 2017
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/5ud5f2/btcchina_bullshitting_its_users_by_extending/

Looks like honey badger doesn't give a damn. Cheesy




125. Post 17870416 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Holliday on February 16, 2017, 08:24:26 AM
You can only cry wolf so many times before people stop giving a shit. I'm honestly shocked they've been able to influence the market as many times as they have.
Indeed. It looks like this time it has very little effect (or none) this time.
Price on BTCC: $969.38   
Price on Bitstamp: $1024.08   

 Cheesy Cheesy

Quote from: gembitz on February 16, 2017, 08:46:48 AM
March 15th = SHORTSQUEEZE!!!! THEY ARE SHORT COINS!!! :-D  HOLY SMOKES!!
It would be amazing to see the ETF get approved just a bit after that (I forgot the exact dates). That would ignite a nice rocket and China would just end up losing even more footing. Tongue



126. Post 17870666 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: becoin on February 16, 2017, 10:55:01 AM
Chinese exchanges are toast.
Good job PBOC!
Indeed. It looks like they are indeed going to make the price less volatile by completely diminishing the importance of the Chinese exchanges. Cheesy

Quote from: 600watt on February 16, 2017, 11:00:44 AM
we should consider re-branding BTCC to BTCC  Cheesy
Excellent idea. You should email them.  Tongue

Quote from: 600watt on February 16, 2017, 11:00:44 AM
edit: SEC ETF ruling is march 11th
Thanks for the information. In the case of a positive ruling: "What if I told you that by the time you can withdraw Bitcoin from BTCC, you won't want to?" Cheesy



127. Post 17895738 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on February 18, 2017, 01:10:26 PM
3+ Exahashes/second!  Shocked I didn't even know what exa stood for before Bitcoin!
Looks like someone hasn't been paying attention to the hashrate lately. It's quite an amazing feat that it has doubled since August 2016!

Quote from: Karartma1 on February 18, 2017, 01:10:26 PM
If the 4 digits will hold until March 11th (ETF day) then I will believe you.
It does seem likely that it will hold, even though I don't usually prefer to speculate much as we know that the market tends to be irrational.

Quote from: abercrombie on February 18, 2017, 03:55:54 PM
$1070 this morning on BFX!

are we rich yet??  Huh
I'm waiting at $10 700. Tongue



128. Post 17942719 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

According to https://bitcoinity.org/markets/bitstamp/USD , we are only $24 away from an ATH on Bitstamp!



Prepare the bottles of champagne.



129. Post 17953090 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Bitstamp ATH? Shocked Are we expecting a new wave of FOMO now? This is it gents.

Quote from: soullyG on February 23, 2017, 06:35:43 PM
Bitstamp ATH broken, next up Bitfinex and then Gox ATH  Cool
What's the Gox "official" ATH?



130. Post 17959280 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on February 23, 2017, 06:40:39 PM
$1242 according to bitcoinity.

https://bitcoinity.org/markets/mtgox/USD
Thanks. I completely forgot to check Bitcoinity from my phone as I believed they removed MtGox.

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on February 23, 2017, 06:40:39 PM
First we have to break the bitfinex ATH at $1175. The question now is what will the silly graphic at bitcoinity be when the bitfinex ATH breaks?
So the price hit $1220 on Bitstamp, which was pretty close to the MtGox ATH. I wonder if it will be reached today?



131. Post 18024860 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Waiting for Gox ATH to be broken..




132. Post 18033268 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: edgar on March 02, 2017, 04:38:09 AM
do we get to pass 1000GBP today?
In case you haven't noticed, it is already 1000 at Gdax:



I'm not sure how important that is considering the amount liquidity for this currency. I'd rather go with the old Mt. Gox ATH.



133. Post 18035133 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: slap on March 02, 2017, 09:22:34 AM
This might be the day btc price surpasses the goldprice. Exciting times.
I disagree with this. IMHO such a rise today would be too much. Let's break the Gox ATH on Bitfinex and Bitstamp first. That would make this yet another great day.

Quote from: bitcoinvest on March 02, 2017, 09:48:38 AM
Can you explain this interesting post of you little bit since i lost almost all my bitcoins at that time on Gox how this i happening ?
You're starting to look like a spammer. Post less and read more.

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on March 02, 2017, 10:08:30 AM
£1000


Congratulations to all fellow Brits
I'm not sure why the congratulations are in order. Was this not hit yesterday? Anyhow, 2$ away from another ATH on Stamp.

Update: I made a mistake. The price of gold is much lower than it was the last time I checked.



134. Post 18038360 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

$1245 is the new official ATH on Bitstamp. Let us go through the list:

What is the next target Huh



135. Post 18038396 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on March 02, 2017, 03:34:18 PM
And bearfinex has now joined bitstamp in breaking the old Gox ATH, but it's still not caught up with bitstamp's $1244 $1245 ATH.
-snip-
Look at this insane buy wall, I haven't seen something similar in a while on Stamp.




136. Post 18038496 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on March 02, 2017, 03:41:20 PM
And bearfinex has now joined bitstamp in breaking the old Gox ATH, but it's still not caught up with bitstamp's $1244 $1245 ATH.
-snip-
Look at this insane buy wall, I haven't seen something similar in a while on Stamp.


It's the opposite on bitfinex, there's a massive sell wall, but it's getting eaten anyway. Bitstamp and bitfinex are playing leapfrog with each other for the ATH.



By the time you've posted and by the time I've checked Bitfinex, which is less than <30 seconds from your post the wall is already gone. What's our target for today? $1300?

Quote from: Torque on March 02, 2017, 03:32:09 PM
Here's another Bitcoin hit piece for ya while I'm waiting:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-28/bitcoin-s-top-rival-is-up-90-and-readying-its-next-big-move
AKA Fed 2.0 centralized shitcoin.



137. Post 18040443 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 02, 2017, 06:26:53 PM
Was that little $20 dip the correction after that steep run up?

I'm sure we'll see a real correction fairly soon but then again it has been self correcting as we go lately.
I think it's correcting itself on the way up. You need to closely watch the price on Bitstamp in 30-60 minute intervals. This however does not mean that there won't be another movement down. I'd be fine with sticking at $1250 for a few days.

Quote from: yefi on March 02, 2017, 06:29:33 PM
* yefi waves goodbye to Gox forever. Au revoir Mark!  Kiss
Yes! I hope that disaster won't mentioned anymore.




138. Post 18041184 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 02, 2017, 06:43:52 PM
There we go.

Gotta love self-correction.

We don't need no stinking bubbles.
 Cool
As much as I love to see the price go up, I'd rather it go up in a steady climb. In that case it is less prone to 'crashing' back down and less volatile. I keep bitcoinity open and check the volatility rates occasionally.

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 02, 2017, 07:31:49 PM
There's that Stamp bidwall again. LOL

This time it barely lasted seconds.
It is most certainly a strange $1+m being moved up and down. My theory is that if the SEC is planning on accepting the ETF, they would be buying Bitcoin up to the approval itself.



139. Post 18042288 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: r0ach on March 02, 2017, 09:31:44 PM
I'll happily dump for silver at peak of ETF approval pump (if such a thing is approved).
Simply put: You're a delusional metal bagholder. It seems that you're on the wrong forum and I have no idea why you aren't banned for off-topic/trolling.

Correction time? $1240 being tested.



140. Post 18046739 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on March 02, 2017, 08:13:29 PM
It is most certainly a strange $1+m being moved up and down. My theory is that if the SEC is planning on accepting the ETF, they would be buying Bitcoin up to the approval itself.
A week ago I was speculating they might be buying OTC Bitcoins on itBit, and that might be the reason it suddenly took over as volume leader during a pump. Its OTC market only deals in trades of over 100 bitcoins, and it's more regulated than most exchanges, which would suit the twins.
There were some unusual movements, but the markets aren't exactly rational. There were buys over $1m on both Gemini and Bitstamp today which makes me lead to believe that in both cases they are genuine investors. I doubt both exchanges would create fake walls to move the price around the same time.

Quote from: r0ach on March 02, 2017, 09:39:04 PM
Delusional is when you are unable to identify fundamentals and are on an investment-centric forum.  Comparing bitcoin vs metals fundamentals is also completely on-topic to price discussion.  Like I said before, the market can be irrational longer than you can remain solvent, but on a long enough timeline, bitcoin should behave as a currency and not "money".  Currencies are typically not stores of value.  

It has taken me a LONG TIME to really do a thorough analysis of bitcoin because there are just far too many variables, but there it is.  For most of the time I was focused on complete red herrings like the consensus systems and nash equilibrium, but most of that is just smoke and mirrors to obfuscate the fact that nobody can really get rid of a centralizing power vacuum force.  Instead of make believing that some new change is going to improve things, the proper analysis is that the ability to be so called "upgraded", which just means changed, is nothing but a negative in the first place.
If you think that Bitcoin is just a currency, you don't know what you're talking about. Cut the analysis bullshit and go back into your metal bagholding forums. You can't sell me such stories.



141. Post 18048480 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

My little stitch today:



Bitcoin price hit 2k on Bitoinde today  Cheesy: https://bitcoinity.org/markets/bitcoinde/EUR




142. Post 18049171 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: bitcoinvest on March 03, 2017, 11:44:35 AM
https://bitcoinity.org/markets/bitcoinde/EUR  is true!!!!
What did just happened? 1 BTC = 2.000€ is this a message to what is coming Huh?
It is nothing special. Someone didn't notice that the amount that they want to purchase isn't available at the current price on that exchange. Instead of slowly buying they spent a lot of quickly get the desired amount. I don't think it is a indicator of anything.

IIRC Bloomberg wrote that China is driving this run and plenty of other news outlets will rewrite their story. Ironically, the price in China is almost $100 behind.



143. Post 18051665 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Paashaas on March 03, 2017, 12:54:08 PM
Same with Dutch papers, they keep warning uss from all those ''criminals'' using Bitcoin  Undecided.
That is bullshit and this 'China' fueling the price rise is also pure bullshit. Looks like the mass media have completely lost it and will spew up any kind of fake stupidity.
Irony: http://www.activistpost.com/2017/03/megabank-caught-laundering-terrorists-drug-cartels-feds-keeping-secret.html

Quote from: Paashaas on March 03, 2017, 12:54:08 PM
Btw Lauda, youre not a mod anymore, how is that possible? I always felt save under youre protection.
The less question you ask around here, the better.  Cheesy

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 03, 2017, 02:56:40 PM
-snip-
All is well in Bitcoinland... currently $1268USD at Bitcoinaverage.

It's almost hard to believe that a couple of days ago we were worrying about things like ATHs and gold ounce parity. Now we take them for granted.

Onward and upward. Go Bitcoin go.
Jimbo we both know that even though we want this rocket to fly high, for it to be healthy it has to hover around the same 'height' for a while. As said I'd like it to be a tad above $1250 for a few days at least.



144. Post 18094498 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Master mind on March 06, 2017, 09:58:12 PM
Bitcoin is too volatile to act as a currency there will be soon no point to owning it.
Such volatility:


 Roll Eyes

Quote from: MNDan on March 07, 2017, 05:00:03 AM
Oh well - gg ETF... :-(
Stop panicking. There are no news yet.

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 07, 2017, 03:31:42 AM
Sideways consolidation after week of ATHs ... most excellent action. Bullish AF.
Looks like it is either that, the sudden BU blocks by Antpool or the fake ETF panic on some subreddit is what caused weak hands to get flushed out.



145. Post 18094680 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: MNDan on March 07, 2017, 05:48:50 AM
It'll get to your "news sources" eventually.
Yeah yeah, 50% of being right, 100% expecting "I told you so." by either side who was just guessing about the outcome like everyone else. Give me a break.

1 day ago there was someone with 'insider' info claiming it will be announced tomorrow with a positive result. One of you must be right. Roll Eyes



146. Post 18097656 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Weak hands shake-out? Correction? Panic due to Antpool BU signaling blocks?

Jihan panicking due to UASF?  Cheesy



147. Post 18097709 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on March 07, 2017, 11:51:03 AM
Back up over $1220 on Stamp now.
-snip-
Speaking of Stamp, I forgot to add in this into the previous post:
https://www.bitstamp.net/article/bitstamp-and-caceis-launch-corporate-bitcoin-inves/

Your turn US. Anyone feeling bullish yet?



148. Post 18098762 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: podyx on March 07, 2017, 01:05:35 PM
text
The blocksize will obviously need to be larger or the fees will become too big. Why is that hard to understand tho?
You can't increase the block size without severely damaging the network as much as certain *groups* can spam it. A block size increase *solves nothing*. This is also quite likely going to negatively impact the price.

Quote from: spooderman on March 07, 2017, 12:59:42 PM
during this flight a bunch of passengers with poor understanding have decided that the pilots and engineers are clueless and need to be undermined.
-snip-
This is what it is in a tl;dr sense. Quite the absurd situation if you present it with a fitting analogy.



149. Post 18107871 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

What happened since yesterday? Another mini-dump or are these still the after-effects of Jihan signalizing BU blocks?

Quote from: york780 on March 08, 2017, 07:20:26 AM
You forget the chinese withdrawals that start tomorrow. When the chinese people see that the price is dropping they always panic and sell. So this means that wee can expect a drop tommorrow, and when ETF is not approved, what is likely to happen, will cause in an another drop. We are going to test 950 usd
You sound like a NLC shill account.



150. Post 18135269 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Paashaas on March 10, 2017, 01:24:45 PM
WoW a nice $40 pump in just one go Shocked
Make that $100+ in minutes. Shocked Cheesy

Quote from: podyx on March 10, 2017, 01:25:56 PM
LOL! I assume the ETF got approved? LMAO JUST GOT HOME, WHAT A NICE SURPIRSE
No public info yet. I guess insider info.



151. Post 18138915 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: mckk on March 10, 2017, 07:06:33 PM
Has SEC ever gave any information during weekend? I mean is it possible that they will post update tomorrow?
No, that is not possible. It is either today or Monday. The latter is less likely though.



152. Post 18138992 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: micalith on March 10, 2017, 07:14:01 PM
https://twitter.com/BTCTN/status/840148448703799296
https://medium.com/@bithernet/bitclub-why-are-you-doing-malleability-attack-now-6faa194b2146#.teeczh1ki

I wouldn't imagine that the toxic state of the bitcoin community would be too favourable for an ETF
This has nothing to do with "toxicity". TX malleability is a known and important issue. Anyone is free to exploit it whenever they want to, just like any other attack vectors. Do keep in mind that "pushing for Segwit with this method" is pure bullshit from BTU folk. Segwit does not solve malleability of standard TX.

Only uneducated people with a lack of understanding would assume that miners are honest or that they will always work towards the common good. Bitcoin is not socialism.



153. Post 18140148 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):



Prepare for the FUD articles everywhere. The media has been waiting for this.



154. Post 18144543 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

This recovery is quite surprising to be honest? Who was expecting it to be back up at $1200 almost after *rejection*? I'm expecting another down movement soon.

Quote from: HanvanBitcoin on March 11, 2017, 07:49:18 AM
Or will we get a second dump later today? Shocked
I would be really surprised if there isn't another dump today or tomorrow.



155. Post 18145200 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on March 11, 2017, 08:54:24 AM
So basically almost everyone sold at the bottom? LOL
I know a lot of people who sold between $1100 and $1000. Cheesy

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on March 11, 2017, 08:54:24 AM
Lessons learned I hope. When in doubt: hold.
>$1200 coming. Buy buy and hold!



156. Post 18145969 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Searing on March 11, 2017, 10:25:25 AM
As to price....are we going to have more FUD with BU and block size now...what do folk think the price will be
BTU* definitely has a negative effect on Bitcoin.

Quote from: Searing on March 11, 2017, 10:25:25 AM
I'm hoping for 2 months of just frigging boring sideways....a little less drama and btc showing some 'legs' and stability would be nice before the
Why 'hoping'?

Quote from: Searing on March 11, 2017, 10:25:25 AM
we sat around 1100 to 1200 or more for the next 3 months..maybe these types would get a clue
I think if it goes back above $1200 soon that it is a very bullish signal.

Quote from: Searing on March 11, 2017, 10:25:25 AM
anyway price of 1200 btc and stable is my bet..others?
$1200+ would be quite amazing after this "disaster" with the SEC. The market seems less and less affected by events (e.g. PBOC banning Bitcoin 93493 times, SEC rejecting the ETF).

Quote from: mckk on March 11, 2017, 10:35:21 AM
Let's have a look at TA for a while:
http://s1.screenshot.sh/data/2017/3/11/11/c9a472040708fe90fa8de9aae3eccc75.jpg - im new so i cannot post photos :/

Any thoughts?
There is no such thing as true 'TA' for Bitcoin markets. There are just random predictions. After an infinite amount of predictions, a finite amount will come true.



157. Post 18146275 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: mckk on March 11, 2017, 11:11:37 AM
I strongly disagree at this point. Maybe im new but all pro forex traders uses TA for their trades. You will also call them stupid people?
The bolded right there is what makes them *stupid*. Nobody calls themselves a "pro forex trader" unless they are desperately in need of approval. Comparing forex trading to Bitcoin trading is also a logical fallacy.

Testing $1190-$1200 again.



158. Post 18159592 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

ETF denied, two days later back at >$1200. Extremely bullish sign?



159. Post 18164384 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

I queried some data just now:

Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | There are currently 31481.413 bitcoins demanded at or over 100.0 USD, worth 23624826.7678 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0134 seconds
<gribble> Bitstamp | There are currently 4035.5572 bitcoins offered at or under 10000.0 USD, worth 6667421.9348 USD in total. | Data vintage: 35.3912 seconds
Feeling bullish yet?



160. Post 18169814 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on March 13, 2017, 12:18:32 PM
Maybe in the future, we will have a crypto, that is convenient enough to actually be used a practical form of payment! Smiley I have hoped for many years already.
You sound like one of the followings: 1) Employed by someone; 2) Altcoin bagholder; 3) Someone who is butthurt from missing out on Bitcoin. You have zero argument to refute that Elwar presented to you, as is, the other currencies have near-zero useful usage. Bitcoin's infrastructure is actually much wider than people think. It is missing a few key points (e.g. Amazon & Ebay), but the current TPS wouldn't be able to handle them anyway. The demand is much higher than the block supply already.

That put aside, Bitcoin is about to test >1250$ again on Bitstamp (currently $1244).



161. Post 18170163 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Elwar on March 13, 2017, 01:04:00 PM
It is missing a few key points (e.g. Amazon & Ebay),
Amazon is one of the best use cases of Bitcoin.

Why would you want Amazon to accept bitcoins when you can buy anything on Amazon at a discount using bitcoins?

You can also buy anything on eBay at 3% off via Gyft, egifter, etc.
It is not about the discount, and I'm well aware of the options. However, I'd like to have the option to directly pay with Bitcoin on those two websites; that's why I mentioned them. Going through that method requires an additional step that some people may not be willing to take.

Quote from: savetherainforest on March 13, 2017, 12:44:13 PM
This is a divine intervention moment! ... When we see if bears get bludgeoned with a spiked hammer or not... Cheesy Cheesy
Plenty of beartards panicking right now. Looks like a lot of people sold at the bottom after the ETF denial. Cheesy



162. Post 18176352 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Searing on March 13, 2017, 11:12:25 PM
The fun fact is that most alt coin pump and dumpers try to make more bitcoins instead of fiat currencies. Bitcoin has a bright future.

Till btc forks because of no block size consensus. Hard to have consensus without dialog

Most altcoins are Bitcoin forks anyways. If BU forks into BTU that is their decision I guess. I think it is primarily being used to fear mongering purposes to supress the price of Bitcoin while they pump up the scamcoins.



163. Post 18183803 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: bitcoinvest on March 14, 2017, 10:41:49 AM
It has been a lot time that i not monitor this thing. we don't have a voting process on that? who makes the final decision ? hard fork could f@ck bitcoin price and trust of course... 
No. There is no "voting process" in a decentralized cryptocurrency. The whole ecosystem either comes to a decision by consensus or not. You technically give your "vote" by running or adopting a specific soft fork, hard fork, or implementation.

Quote from: soullyG on March 14, 2017, 02:13:56 PM
Stocks down, Bitcoin up  Grin

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks-idUSKBN16L1B6?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=Social
Fed raising interest rates -> bullish for Bitcoin? Would be nice if someone elaborated on that.



164. Post 18206710 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 16, 2017, 06:36:02 AM
if you find yourself having FOMO about some shitcoin train

i'm sorry there's no hope for you... just, go make yourself useful and run a BU node.
BU is the caboose on the shitcoin train ... so you're right at home I guess.
Ironically, if the BTU folk do truly care about the users as the claim that they do, they'd add SWSF and 'emergent consensus' on top of that. This adds a short term capacity increase and plenty of benefits, and they get to keep their 'HF is best' nonsense. In reality, they don't care about the users.

Quote from: bitcoinminer42 on March 16, 2017, 06:36:16 AM
where do u guys trade DASH and ETH?
Poloniex.

Quote from: 600watt on March 16, 2017, 06:36:25 AM
https://vinnylingham.com/a-fork-in-the-road-70288fd3c046#.pp9kazg8p

once again, vinny nails it.

we should try to stand together. we need to find a compromise. civil war needs to stop.
This is similar to the debate 'vaccines cause autism'. One side has actual data to support their claim that it doesn't, the other has pseudo-science and 1 false research which claims otherwise. Roll Eyes



165. Post 18206738 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 16, 2017, 06:41:12 AM
Ill compromise..

if core code's EC instead of "effective block weight" i'll accept their segwit.
EC is highly unsafe and radical change to the security of Bitcoin. How many times does this have to be told to you? Even if you had a transaction with 50 confirmations, it could end up being dropped due to a chain reorganization. Roll Eyes



166. Post 18206804 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 16, 2017, 06:47:09 AM
you misunderstand the built in incentives.
take the deal...
There are no incentives to prevent chain reorganizations. This is how BTU was meant to work. It looks like even you don't understand what you're preaching for.

Quote from: 600watt on March 16, 2017, 06:47:19 AM
you are right, but the anti-vaccine side has the power to blow it all up. i think it would be better to reach out and find a compromise. another multiyear downtrend now would be a killer.

incredible irony that this showdown seems to take place in a moment of highest prices in bitcoin history. in a moment of grand success. we got there all together. we should stay together.  
UASF: User activated soft fork. This is most likely what is coming, although deploying SWSF alone would be much simpler. If the BTU signalling (ironically still running Bitcoin Core) pools were to do that, Segwit would be at around 50-70%.



167. Post 18206853 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 16, 2017, 06:55:36 AM
you know expect the incentive to NOT have everyone loss confidence in the network.
Yet this "incentive" somehow isn't preventing you from desiring a split in Bitcoin, which is.. you've guessed it: a loss of confidence in the network.


Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 16, 2017, 06:55:36 AM
a miner fighting for 50 Blocks ( potentially losing $$$$$$$ if it doesn't work in his favor) only to incress block size so he can include more TX fee, all the while knowing once the regor hits and the news comes out price will crash.

yaaaaaaaaaa thats a remote possibility
Yet it does exist. Smiley



168. Post 18216274 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: tk3609 on March 16, 2017, 10:13:22 PM
Looks like that this dip is just the begening
Looks like you sold at the bottom, didn't you? Cheesy

It is quite possible that it recovers back to where it was in less than 24 hours. $1170 on Stamp already.



169. Post 18220007 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

So, what happened? I don't see any news of China banning Bitcoin or similar. ~11% drop in 24 hours does seem sharp when there are no news about it.



170. Post 18220069 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 17, 2017, 07:30:50 AM
So, what happened? I don't see any news of China banning Bitcoin or similar. ~11% drop in 24 hours does seem sharp when there are no news about it.
But is it enough? I say thee nay! A further drop is needed!
What makes you think that it is not enough? The price has been rising for weeks and has been correcting itself on the way up. Unless, you sold at the bottom? Cheesy

Look at the other cryptocurrencies market, it has tripled in <10 days. Organic growth? Roll Eyes



171. Post 18222602 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 17, 2017, 07:49:05 AM
Sold higher up. Wanna buy lower down. Simple stuff.
No thanks.

Quote from: HanvanBitcoin on March 17, 2017, 09:13:23 AM
Almost below €1000,-.  I have my buy order placed at €850,-
You definitely sold at the bottom. Cheesy

Recovery time? It is definitely way oversold.



172. Post 18228665 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: podyx on March 17, 2017, 09:13:10 PM
Not looking good at all right now
It continues to drop lower and lower thanks to the BTU idiots. They will get their altcoin listed as BTU on exchanges according to the new agreement. Cheesy


Ghost walls being removed.



173. Post 18229309 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: boyshx on March 17, 2017, 10:26:00 PM
Guys. If a hard fork was inminent would you hodl?
I'd dump the BTU chain with everything I have, in addition to telling everyone I know to do the same. I stopped holding altcoins in 2016, especially shitcoins such as BTU.

If you want to attempt to profit, then it is likely that you would be able to buy back in lower without a major risk.



174. Post 18236205 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

What happened? $70 drop in a few seconds.

Is crypto done? Thanks BTU. Roll Eyes



175. Post 18239384 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: MinermanNC on March 18, 2017, 05:28:25 PM
This gives a good overview of where all the nodes are at right now. Interesting, the way I am reading it is BU nodes at 33.1 %

http://xtnodes.com/
No. Why are you preaching something which you do not even understand? BU nodes are at ~8% at best (see here: https://bitnodes.21.co/nodes/), or more realistically at 2% (see here: http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html).

Quote from: B1tUnl0ck3r on March 18, 2017, 05:30:28 PM
So about this http://www.coindesk.com/coindesk-explainer-bitcoin-unlimited-debate/

https://www.bitcoinunlimited.info/ (again one of those stupid java only website, says enough)

the idea sound great BUT :
BU/BTU is a absurdly stupid idea that provides even more centralization incentives and power to the mining cartel. Is this what you mean by 'sounds great'? Roll Eyes

Quote from: B1tUnl0ck3r on March 18, 2017, 05:30:28 PM
But the big pools can fork it almost when ever they want, no?
They can fork into an altcoin whenever they want to.

Price is back at $1000, and I'm not exactly sure in which direction it may head now. We may see some clarity next week.



176. Post 18239486 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: MinermanNC on March 18, 2017, 05:42:28 PM
LAUDA,
Quote
BU nodes are at ~8% at best (see here: https://bitnodes.21.co/nodes/), or more realistically at 2% (see here: http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html).

whew ok, that's looks better  Wink

Thx for the link and your input on this
What you were looking at is :
Quote
In the last 24 hours (144 blocks), Unlimited + Classic hashrate is ~1366 PH/s (37.5%) of the total Bitcoin network (3642 PH/s).
If you compare this to the nodes + the desires of the economic majority, you can see how something is obviously wrong. Miners should be working towards the interest of the users and the economy, but in this case they aren't. The reason for that is is because a *certain* mr. Jihan is controlling pretty much all of the BU hashrate (he just diversified it under other pools that suddenly popped up with hundreds of petahashes). Roll Eyes This is a better and simpler way to view the current total (signalling): https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pools?resolution=24h and you can see individual pools signalling here (when they mine blocks): https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC

Quote from: Ibian on March 18, 2017, 05:41:18 PM
People are panicking that we are dropping down to $1000. I love it. This was a far off dream not that long ago.
Half a year ago, $1000 was a dream. Now, people are panicking because we are back to $1000? How times quickly change. Cheesy



177. Post 18246379 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Finex mini bear-whale just appeared:


I think we are likely going to see another movement down today. It will definitely go up next week if the spoiled Chinese brat Jihan stops his HF FUD propaganda.



178. Post 18317525 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

This manipulation is quite obvious to me. Go to Poloniex, and look when a lot of alts were bought before Bitcoin dipped. It seems that the tactic is as follows:
1) Buy up several alts (whilst avoiding a price rise)
2) Short BTC and continue buying alts.
3) Dump alts to get more BTC.

Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | Total bids: 13528806 USD. Total asks: 6014 BTC. Ratio: 2249.48736 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0129 seconds



179. Post 18325062 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

This was somewhat unexpected, I had some shopping plans coming up soon. I guess I'll have to hold onto my Bitcoin.

That aside, this is the direct result of the hard fork (which is unnecessary anyways) propaganda from Ver & Jihan. Not long ago, the SEC decision was a really big event. Tens of thousands of people were waiting for it that day. The negative decision was corrected (price vise) in a matter of days. The price may get even messier, but hopefully $900 holds as some sort of *bottom*. However, keep in mind the following:
Segwit is going to activate, because the economy & supermajority of users are in support of it. Read the BIP 148 UASF Segwit: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0148.mediawiki



180. Post 18325099 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Searing on March 25, 2017, 07:26:00 AM
can't miners just play blockage and thus stalemate? ....don't get how this can work if 30% of folk want BU..or am I just in denial about the 'inevitable' fork of BTC Smiley
Did you even read the BIP before asking questions? Angry This does not really need miners, especially not 95% as the BIP9 activation does. It sets a flag day. When this day is reached, anyone running this BIP (Bitfury is already testing it) is producing Segwit blocks and this is compatible with all >0.13.1 nodes.

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on March 25, 2017, 07:27:08 AM
Did you manage to buy? Smiley
There is some *sell* pressure with a minor wall now. The order book was much thinner yesterday. Bitcoin price seems just as unpredictable as it used to be.



181. Post 18325164 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Searing on March 25, 2017, 07:34:10 AM
Would just 'justify' a BU fork in my view.....thus price of $200 buck coin....would both chains recover with that 'brand name of bitcoin' hit Smiley

Just saying if it was that easy ...why ask for 95% activation....for seg witness in the first place..just feel I missing the other shoe to fall ..seems too easy

(hope I am wrong however)

No. Practically almost the whole economy and a super majority of users are supporting Segwit (have implemented/are testing/have planned an implementation of Segwit). This is only the Jihan & Ver cartel blocking consensus from forming. They can create their worthless fork, nobody wants it. Segwit is activating, with or without them.

Once this issue has been taken care of, I expect the trust & positive bull trend to continue. If everything ends up being *okay*, I expect the price above $2k in the months post activation. A lot of people are just uninformed about the real benefits of Segwit (capacity aside). This is primarily due to the propaganda lies, as found on r/btc.



182. Post 18325612 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: r0ach on March 25, 2017, 07:54:22 AM
-snip-
This is why I say I hope you people bought some physical, tangible items with your moon priced bitcoins, because everything about digital currency trading and price is so heinously fraudulent (as can be seen by 0.1 btc priced darkcoins), that it's all going to come collapsing down in a big way someday.  It's obviously not a store of value when nobody is even putting anything of value on the line in a lot of cases in the first place...leveraging illiquid assets...
Enough of your nonsense metals propaganda. The market of metals is one of the corruptest and overpriced markets out there. Neither gold nor silver are worth anywhere near what they're priced at right now (don't make me go into diamonds and other crap).

Quote from: kurious on March 25, 2017, 08:19:20 AM
Did you even read the BIP before asking questions? Angry This does not really need miners, especially not 95% as the BIP9 activation does. It sets a flag day. When this day is reached, anyone running this BIP (Bitfury is already testing it) is producing Segwit blocks and this is compatible with all >0.13.1 nodes.

What sort of timescale are you suggesting for this?
It is already defined in the BIP. October 2017. Anyone who has a client supporting Segwit already does not have to do anything.

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 25, 2017, 08:20:03 AM
It takes two to tango, doesn't it?
There is no tango here.

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 25, 2017, 08:20:03 AM
To the degree people are choosing alts over BTC, Ver & Jihan can hardly be held accountable. Core has dropped the ball. Can they pick it up? That would require a schism (another one) in Core. UASF is almost as divisive as BU. And without leadership...
This is bullshit. Nobody in their right fucking mind would attempt to use one of these scam coins. The only reason that people go in those is to gather more Bitcoin. That said, both Ver & Jihan are directly responsible for this, with their power-grab attempt. Core has done nothing wrong. They provided a very good (Segwit isn't perfect) scaling solution that would provide ~2.1 MB worth of TXs with adoption. In addition to that, they'd implement Schnorr post Segwit which would give the network even more capacity without requiring a HF.

Quote from: Searing on March 25, 2017, 07:44:11 AM
-snip-
argh..just pump to 2k already and I'd not be worrying about frigging 2.25k of btc in my attic in $$$ towards ebay Sad
My understanding is that, some price decline post ETF denial was to be expected and healthy. However, this is starting to become too much. People are *scared*, and this is directly due to the threats from Jihan to fork BTC into BTC & BTU (altcoin). If there was never a BTU, and Segwit activated in late December or early Q1 2017, we could have probably been at $2000 already (at least for a moment).



183. Post 18327291 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: slap on March 25, 2017, 11:50:28 AM
"store of value"
Bitcoin is up 'Change: +52.80%' in 6 months and everyone is crying in here. Roll Eyes One year ago, this price was a dream.

Nobody likes a price decline, but you know who you need be complaining about (hint: the last name ends with a Ver and a Wu). $900 should hold, I guess.



184. Post 18332091 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: yefi on March 25, 2017, 06:06:18 PM
This is bullshit. Nobody in their right fucking mind would attempt to use one of these scam coins. The only reason that people go in those is to gather more Bitcoin.
Is that a fact or a wish? One might well argue that the only reason many go into Bitcoin is to gather more USD (or equivalent). If the market cap of alts surpasses that of Bitcoin, many will ask themselves: do I trade alts to make more bitcoin, or bitcoin to make more alts? Bitcoin's army is one composed of mercenaries, and allegiance to profit matters more than righteousness.
This is neither a wish nor a fact. It can't be a fact; it is an observation. Here's a prime example:

BitPay Won’t Use Bitcoin Alternatives For Payment Systems Despite Scaling Issues
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitpay-wont-use-bitcoin-alternatives-payment-systems-despite-scaling-issues/

Nobody in their right mind is going to jump on board of these scam coins. 99.9% are utterly horrible. Only those led on by pure greed would jump on this bandwagon for real (e.g. early bagholders).

That said, UASF Segwit should move us forward towards more capacity and to secondary layer solution. THe price is bound to increase as soon as this get safely deployed. One day we may be looking back at this time, and call it the 'dark ages' of mining cartels. Cheesy

Quote from: JohnUser on March 25, 2017, 07:25:24 PM
You too... cause you don't predict, you just follow what afrikoin's said.

Market resist at 900 when you all sat at your 700$ open order.
Most of the people claiming the sold at the TOP, bought at the BOTTOM or predicted exact numbers are full of shit.



185. Post 18340154 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

BTU blocks lower than Segwit in the 24 hours. Bottom seems to have been reached at around $900 for now. $990 wall being eaten on Bitstamp; time for a breakout?




186. Post 18351597 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: willope on March 27, 2017, 11:20:25 AM
BU hashrate 47,2% the last 24 hours.
SELL, PANIC,
Bitcoin is DEAD Shocked

No, seriously, I am a bit worried. My life saving is all in, it's quite stressing.
Stop panicking and using 24 hour based numbers as stats. This is called Variance. Just a little over a day ago, BU was sub 30% and Segwit was leading. Calm down and ignore the fork, which apparently nobody wants (see at the price on Bitfinex e.g.).

Quote from: Cassius on March 27, 2017, 11:26:23 AM
Well this is certainly getting Interesting.
The market doesn't massively seem to care yet though. Still pushing $1k.
The market is currently starting to regain trust that a fork will not happen. There have been several statements that companies don't want Bitcoin to fork in two. For example:


https://twitter.com/f2pool_wangchun/status/846266755391512577

They can't reach 75% without F2Pool and the others supporting Segwit anyways.

Current trend: Minor bullish.
After BTU is completely dead: Massive bull-train.



187. Post 18420120 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: willope on April 01, 2017, 08:28:40 PM
BU hashrate now 50,7%
 Sad
Segwit hashrate: 45.65%

It is pretty much the same as it was back at 35% vs 30%. Nothing changed. I wonder where the Price would be if there was no BTU attack panic recently. Roll Eyes



188. Post 18451237 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

This place seems to quiet during a positive movement. Anyone sold at the bottom? Cheesy



$1200 would be nice again.



189. Post 18486035 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):



Even with all of the 51% HF attack fear mongering, Bitmain stalling for selfish reasons and covert abuse of ASICBoost. Now imagine where the price would be if neither had occurred and Segwit was already activated.



190. Post 18521756 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Has the ~1k BTC wall on Bitstamp been eaten or has it been withdrawn? Has anyone managed to catch that one? I had some work to do and missed the price breaking $1200. This trend seems extremely bullish even with North Korea aka. Jihan practically holding the network hostage.



191. Post 18527966 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Kramerc on April 09, 2017, 05:21:20 PM
Has the ~1k BTC wall on Bitstamp been eaten or has it been withdrawn? Has anyone managed to catch that one? I had some work to do and missed the price breaking $1200. This trend seems extremely bullish even with North Korea aka. Jihan practically holding the network hostage.
Apparently, 2 networks Sad

How anyone with half a brain can be on this guy's side is beyond my reach.
You are absolutely right. I had just forgotten to mention Litecoin's situation considering that I was merely posting about the price of Bitcoin. It is absolutely clear that Jihan is holding Litecoin hostage.

Quote from: JimboToronto on April 09, 2017, 05:35:19 PM
Has the ~1k BTC wall on Bitstamp been eaten or has it been withdrawn? Has anyone managed to catch that one? I had some work to do and missed the price breaking $1200.
When I started watching it was already down to a little over 300 coins. That was eaten, followed by another 80-odd coins immediately after.
That's interesting and good to hear (rather than it being removed, which would be a sign of manipulation). The price seems to be back around $1200 again. I wonder if it will hold.



192. Post 18626379 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):



Have I missed something which has triggered this movement on Bitstamp?

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on April 17, 2017, 12:31:42 PM
Bearstamp Vs. Bullfinex
I'm still wondering when China is going to sort their exchanges.



193. Post 18824430 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: spooderman on May 01, 2017, 02:14:16 PM
edit: haha did anyone catch the stewie gif on bitcoinity?
Those gifs are too short! Unless one is watching closely, they are likely going to miss it. $1380 ATH on Bitstamp.

Do you by any chance mean this one?





194. Post 18824552 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: spooderman on May 01, 2017, 02:24:44 PM
holy shit is this it?

the moment where the exchanges all just run out of coins?
I've just checked for you:
Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | There are currently 1691.1098 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 2604032.93335 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0213 seconds
<gribble> Bitfinex | There are currently 3638.299 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 6204356.41866 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0039 seconds
<gribble> Bitstamp | There are currently 2385.5904 bitcoins offered at or under 10000.0 USD, worth 7265650.64998 USD in total. | Data vintage: 211.7202 seconds
<gribble> Bitfinex | There are currently 3965.5064 bitcoins offered at or under 10000.0 USD, worth 7949085.14331 USD in total. | Data vintage: 57.1450 seconds

$1400 next stop on Stamp (Finex is long above $1500 it seems).



195. Post 18826434 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):



For those that do not know, it's a holiday in Europe today. Bank deposits should process early tomorrow. Where are the trains and rockets?

Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | There are currently 972.0375 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 1580885.67996 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0275 seconds
<gribble> Bitfinex | There are currently 3425.8439 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 5994937.65539 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0036 seconds



196. Post 18826779 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):




197. Post 18834790 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

What are the targets for today, $1450 - $1500 on BitStamp? There is some talk about short liquidation if Bitfinex hits $1600 which could slingshot it much further.

Here's fresh data:
Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | There are currently 982.38728 bitcoins offered at or under 1500.0 USD, worth 1433594.02869 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0343 seconds
<gribble> Bitfinex | There are currently 1312.4168 bitcoins offered at or under 1600.0 USD, worth 2071869.47179 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0040 seconds



198. Post 18834857 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: mike4001 on May 02, 2017, 08:40:49 AM
new stamp ath incoming...
USD 1422 at the moment.

Wasn't it a little bit higher yesterday?
The Bitstamp ATH is $1425. We are ~$3 away from a new one (although the small changes in ATH are irrelevant). You can easy check this out on any chart: https://bitcoinity.org/markets/bitstamp/USD

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 02, 2017, 08:46:45 AM
From your description, it looks like a large majority of those would be liquidated by $1500 and there are only a marginal additional number after $1500... so even somewhere between $1500 and $1600 could be reasonable for this particular pump.. gosh no guarantees, but decent incentives remain.. but we also have to remember that bitfinex is already in the mid $1500s while everyone else is in the mid $1400s.. .. yet getting another $100 out of this pump does not seem to be too fantastical a hypothesis
The bank transfers in countries that had a holiday yesterday should be processing today. Therefore, I do not see a reason for which this shouldn't continue at least for a little while longer.




199. Post 18835638 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

There are some pathetically desperate bears on Bitstamp:



Is this all they've got? Here's a gem from the past, i.e. the slaying of a bearwhale (30k BTC): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uX_bB_4VJk



200. Post 18836015 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: Elwar on May 02, 2017, 10:15:52 AM
Not much we can do about that. Looks like the price will never go above $1436.

 Cry
I know that you're being sarcastic, or at least hope that you are. The "mini-wall" has been eaten:


New Bitstamp ATH $1440. Does anyone remember when reaching gold parity was interesting? Cheesy



201. Post 18837922 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: Paashaas on May 02, 2017, 12:24:18 PM
Bitcoin Exchanges Multiply in Japan as Demand from Institutional Investors Rises  Smiley

https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-exchanges-japan-demand-institutional-investors-rises/
Hopefully that article isn't an exaggeration.  Cheesy



Is this the "dip"? If so, then I'm betting on $1500+ on Bitstamp + GDAX by the end of this day.




202. Post 18843633 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Someone asked for an update of this gif, and someone created it (I'm just sharing). Make sure to bookmark it: https://i.giphy.com/l4FGCYu1xKXZAoBwc.gif (can't be embedded here probably due to filesize)

Any projections for this uncharted territory? New support building at $14xx+?



203. Post 18849674 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: Paashaas on May 03, 2017, 02:00:22 AM
Thx Lauda, unfortunately the pic doesn't work anymore, i think the price is to high with all those extra zero's Cool
I didn't have time to modify it so that it works on the forum too, but someone else did in the meantime.

Quote from: Paashaas on May 03, 2017, 02:00:22 AM
Rumor is if Finex hits $1600 it will rocket to $2000 with all those shorts destroyed. Followed with a (weekend) dump to sub $1400 or $1300 is plausible.
Finex was above $1600 yesterday. Didn't you catch that?

Quote from: Karartma1 on May 03, 2017, 06:21:32 AM
thank you Lauda  Wink
You are welcome.

Quote from: Karartma1 on May 03, 2017, 06:21:32 AM
About projections: until I don't see the finex thing solved in one way or another I don't know what is going to happen and if we'll keep $1400.

Quote from: Denker on May 03, 2017, 08:09:51 AM
In terms of the price, building out a new bottom around 1400 would be great. But it's still too early imo and that BitFinex issue still isn't solved and feels a bit like the sword of damocles. This won't have such an impact as Mt.Gox had in 2014 but definitely could do enough harm in terms of future price and trend development.
Support building above $1400 would be a very good indicator IMO.




204. Post 18851293 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

$4 away from yesterdays ATH on Bitstamp. Is anyone else ready for $1500 to break over there as I am?



Quote from: Wekkel on May 03, 2017, 11:23:17 AM
Wait for ridiculous, and then some more. And sell then.
I would advise against attempting to sell high and buying low for inexperienced people, i.e. those who don't trade often. It is highly likely that you will end up doing the opposite, i.e. sell low and buy back in high. I've seen this happen to a lot of people.



205. Post 18858315 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):



This was the latest Bitcoinity gif that was shown whilst watching Bitstamp. Cheesy

Quote from: phatsphere on May 03, 2017, 08:19:13 PM
~300 btc wall still standing on bitstamp
~240 to go.

Quote from: Biro Bob on May 03, 2017, 08:23:01 PM
I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little excited about crossing $1500 on stamp.  Grin
I think that a lot of people are currently using Bitstamp as a real measurement of the price. Therefore, $1500 is somewhat significant to be broken there.

Update: Wall was eaten.







206. Post 18864404 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: soullyG on May 04, 2017, 08:37:18 AM
I love waking up to a new ATH every morning, really gets the day started off well  Grin
My thoughts exactly. Quite the amazing feeling. $1550 right now on Stamp. Is $1600 a viable target for today? This feels much different than a bubble, it grew 19% in 7 days.

Ready for some champagne, gents?





207. Post 18864672 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: soullyG on May 04, 2017, 08:55:08 AM
It definitely feels possible, but we've been going up so fast the last few days that I feel a substantial correction is in order (~$150 or so) if we do hit it that quickly
Why a correction that big thought? Maybe it may stabilize somewhere between 1500-1600$. All it needs to do is spend some time not moving in either direction to make it 'healthier'.

Quote from: BitcoinBA on May 04, 2017, 09:03:41 AM
Did you sell already, or still waiting? Smiley I expect the correction to be quite significant...
Yes from $10k into ~$3-5k. I'm not selling anything even in times of need below $10k.

Quote from: Searing on May 04, 2017, 09:05:15 AM
Likely you are correct. But I'm a long term holder of 100 btc..thus this too shall pass. Smiley
The bare minimum for anyone should be the Bitcoin Millionaire Club (21 BTC), although that seems rather expensive nowadays. Cheesy



208. Post 18864804 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: Searing on May 04, 2017, 09:09:30 AM
Damn! I hope you are an "crypto prophet" Smiley
I just might be!

Quote from: soullyG on May 04, 2017, 09:13:22 AM
True, I just can't help but feel that the latest rally is a bit "forced"... Bitfinex shenanigans etc
I would tend to somewhat disagree. What I expected is that Bitfinex price would keep rising while the other exchanges kept going down or not moving at all due to increased sell pressure (getting Bitcoins out of Finex and selling them on other exchanges). However, the problems with Bitfinex also came around the time that Bitcoin essentially went "viral" in Japan along with the ruling that it is a legal means of payment. Right now, the spread between Bitstamp and Bitfinex is: ~80$, which is ~4.9%. This is much lower than it used to be (percentage wise). It was around 7-8% IIRC.



209. Post 18865053 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: becoin on May 04, 2017, 09:30:34 AM
I'm bored. It is the same picture every day! The rise and rise and rise of bitcoin...
There are too many ATHs. After waiting for so long since 2013, it started becoming an everyday occurrence, thus boring. $50-$100 movements and some *psychological levels* are interesting.

Quote from: mike4001 on May 04, 2017, 09:41:16 AM
Am I the only one who thinks this is going too fast at the moment?
Am I the only one who thinks that you sold at the bottom? Cheesy



210. Post 18871061 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Here is some data:

Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | There are currently 2016.89 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 3446929.03909 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0154 seconds
<gribble> Bitfinex | There are currently 3957.3992 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 7180102.62289 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0043 seconds

I was away for a few hours. I can't believe how close we are to $1600 on Bitstamp.

Quote from: bitserve on May 04, 2017, 05:09:03 PM
I don't want to see a violent correction that ruins my day. Thanks.
If Bitcoin were to violently correct after a double digit rise in 2 months, what should happen to the alts which generally had a  >500% raise (total market cap) in the same time period?



211. Post 18871318 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: Syke on May 04, 2017, 05:32:36 PM
All this bubble talk because we just had a small rally of the last 3 days?
I love your perspective. +20% in 3 days is "small".
I love your perspective of bubbles. Altcoins:



500% in 60 days seems rather small in comparison to <50% in 60 days for Bitcoin, does it not? Roll Eyes



212. Post 18872922 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on May 04, 2017, 07:29:38 PM
Sorry to piss on everyone's parade but when is the dip?
$1530 on Bitstamp. Either this is the dip or we have reached the end of our current flight.

Quote from: Ibian on May 04, 2017, 07:36:34 PM
People who gamble on gox, get goxed.
Gox was easy to avoid if you knew what you were doing.



213. Post 18878701 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: ft73 on May 05, 2017, 07:07:04 AM
Douple top not out of cards and WE ahead.
Don't pull that TA nonsense right now. There is no double top. You only perceive what you want to.

Whilst being away for a while, I certainly did not expect us to be at $1600 again right now. I do hope resistance starts building above $1500 for an enjoyable ride.

Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | There are currently 2252.5962 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 3875941.4895 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0114 seconds
<gribble> Bitfinex | There are currently 3077.8532 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 5559535.08821 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0091 seconds



214. Post 18894339 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: york780 on May 06, 2017, 08:45:47 AM
We only need a scaling solution for the moon. What are they waiting for?
Segwit -> Signature Aggregation & Schnorr Signatures -> LN & sidechains.

Quote from: Nagadota on May 06, 2017, 08:41:52 AM
USDT is making a recovery and Coinbase and Bitfinex are at roughly equal prices since Bitfinex agreed to have Friedman LLP do a balance sheet audit.

A lot of the uncertainty is fading away.  This is looking good.  Very good.
I wasn't expecting Bitfinex to be the next Mt. Gox even though there was a lot of fear being spread around the forum and in this particular thread. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt until I read the public announcement. The difference between Finex and Stamp is <40$ right now. As the price is still above $1500, this means that the price rise was not artificially induced via Finex issues.



215. Post 18894914 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: afbitcoins on May 06, 2017, 10:42:49 AM
BU leads to bigger blockchain which leads to blockchain too be to be decentralised, which leads to centralisation
BU opens the road to a DOS attack vector with their bare block size increase. Additionally, (as was already seen) they also open up a lot of exploits in their bad code.

Quote from: afbitcoins on May 06, 2017, 10:42:49 AM
Segwit leads to LN which leads to transactions handled off chain which leads bankers rejoicing and to centralised control of bitcoin
This is bullshit. LN does not need Segwit and LN will happen regardless of whether you want it or not, or whether Segwit is adopted or not. LN needs a malleability fix, and SW is just one of the ways of doing that. LN does in no way create centralized control of Bitcoin nor does it lead to bankers "rejoicing". Looks like someone didn't even read the ELI5.

Quote from: Grillo on May 06, 2017, 10:06:01 AM
good, I have some USDT so you better be right.
Just don't tell me that you're holding USDT on the shady exchange called Poloniex. Roll Eyes Just be a bit more patient (Finex wise).



216. Post 18895336 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: afbitcoins on May 06, 2017, 11:08:50 AM
This sounds like a good way to sneak in a malleability fix. Maybe a malleability fix is not a good idea?
A malleability fix is definitely needed. Assuming the worst because you lack knowledge and understanding is absurd.

Quote from: afbitcoins on May 06, 2017, 11:08:50 AM
Why can't core release modular updates instead of bundling it all together?
What good would this do besides delaying the already very delayed process of implementing Segwit?

Quote from: afbitcoins on May 06, 2017, 11:08:50 AM
LN do enable centralised control of bitcoin transactions. Its just a matter of scale. Think of the size of banks and equate that to LNs
LN does not enable any kind of centralized control. You do not understand LN, neither the reasons behind it, its features nor its limitations.

You should go back to ELI5 threads and we should be back to discussing the price in here.



Jimbo, where are you?



217. Post 18897523 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: yefi on May 06, 2017, 02:31:21 PM
Just don't tell me that you're holding USDT on the shady exchange called Poloniex. Roll Eyes Just be a bit more patient (Finex wise).
Not a word to be bandied about lightly - what's the basis of this accusation?
Okay, fair point. I have changed the wording to shady (see original post/quote update). Just look at all those orchestrated pumps and dumps, and random dead coins going up >1000-10000%. There is no way that Poloniex isn't involved in some way IMO.

Quote from: petemoss2 on May 06, 2017, 12:59:32 PM
Bitfinex is only $33 higher than Stamp!
This is a sign of confidence in the market. The interesting thing about the current price is that GDAX is $15 higher than Bitfinex!



218. Post 18911657 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Bitcoin Is Less Volatile than the Euro: https://fee.org/articles/bitcoin-is-less-volatile-than-the-euro/ ; don't invest in Euro more than you can afford to lose. Oh how the tide is turning. Cheesy

Quote from: JimboToronto on May 07, 2017, 03:22:09 PM
3rd day of consolidation in mid-$1500s... currently $1546USD (Bitcoinaverage).
I think that a lot of people thought it would heavily correct itself and thus also sold at the bottom. That's one of the reasons why this thread is quite. Consolidation at this price is very optimistic IMO. Now if miners/pools were to activate SegWit we'd probably see a very sharp rise within the year: https://twitter.com/ViaBTC/status/860933165002522625



219. Post 18918329 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: Paashaas on May 08, 2017, 02:30:44 AM
All altcoins will be replaced by sidechains.
All altcoin use cases can be superseeded by sidechains, thus altcoins really won't have any use-case. I'll prepare my popcorn once sidechains become viable.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 08, 2017, 02:53:01 AM
Price target of this week; $1600-$1800.
That is a pretty broad range.
It is, and so was $1200-$1600 and yet here we are.


Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 08, 2017, 02:53:01 AM
If we get significantly above and beyond $1,600 (on Stamp, of course) - let's say above $1623, then we are going to have a decent likelihood to be moving into testing the resistance in the $1,800 to $2,000 price territory... though it could take anywhere between a day or two or a few weeks to get to the $1,800 to $2,000 price range.
BitFinex is about to announce 'news' this Monday and the price is already ~$20 away from its 3d high or ~$60 from the ATH. Coinbase and Gemini are also above $1600 whilst Bitstamp isn't far from it. I think that the sentiment is still very bullish.



220. Post 18919200 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Altcoins are absurd. 99% are scams, vaporware or have no use-case. This is a full blown out Tulip Mania: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania ; Just a small heads up to those who do not know what happened with the Tulip bubble:



Back to the important stuff:
Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 08, 2017, 02:53:01 AM
I think that part of my point was that the prediction range is so broad that it makes the prediction almost meaningless. 
I don't think he meant to speculate only anything other than that the bull trend is still present and that we're going up.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 08, 2017, 02:53:01 AM
I don't really disagree with the sentiment though.. and it is possible that that prices could bounce within such a 15% price range throughout the upcoming week.
In case that you've missed this (which I find rather very important): https://fee.org/articles/bitcoin-is-less-volatile-than-the-euro/
Here are two nice website to track this:
https://www.buybitcoinworldwide.com/volatility-index/
https://bitvol.info/



221. Post 18919609 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 08, 2017, 06:08:36 AM
Even though I mostly agree... I find it quite funny and ironic that we are here talking about Tulips when that is the same they all were saying about Bitcoin some years ago Smiley
I never said Bitcoin had anything related to the Tulip mania. Whoever did clearly didn't understand anything at that point of time. Looks awfully similar, doesn't it (the more you zoom out, the worse it gets)?




Compare that to the Bitcoin chart for the same time period (full view):





222. Post 18919697 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 08, 2017, 06:26:08 AM
Yes, but now swap that altcoins market cap graph for the one of Bitcoin until november 2013.

In fact that's exactly the comparison they used to do.
False comparison. This is a time span of 3 months and you're comparing it to a time span of several years. Additionally, the 2013 bubble was caused by the Willy bot. It has nothing to do with the actual price of BTC (thus the chart would need to be forcibly corrected).

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on May 08, 2017, 06:27:48 AM
I'm not happy yet. I want to see ETH correct itself more, before I trust it enough to buy it back Smiley
Classic corporation/centralist shill.

Quote from: Lauda on May 08, 2017, 06:18:34 AM

When is it going to pop and who is going to be left holding these bags?



223. Post 18922637 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 08, 2017, 08:09:22 AM
That's some serious lack of self-awareness, right there. All of the arguments can be, and have been applied to btc earlier as well. I didn't believe them back then, and as time progresses, that position is only confirmed. That said, nothing per se means that a bubbling alt market is a tulip mania, just like the bubbling btc market wasn't in itself a necessary signal for tulip mania back then.
Disagreed. Anything that even closely resembled a bubble in Bitcoin has always crashed (see May 2013). It doesn't seem like you can recognize obvious bubbles, or are you telling me that >$20 billion poured into alts in <60 days?
 
Quote from: oda.krell on May 08, 2017, 08:09:22 AM
Probably true in terms of percentage over coins, but not in terms of market cap (in a loose sense, I know).
It is true, but I did not mention market cap dominance being rightfully 99% did I?

Quote from: oda.krell on May 08, 2017, 08:09:22 AM
I'm not worried about btc dominance, it is the main player and I don't see that changing in the near future, based on what I observe.
Neither am I. BTC dominance on market cap is nonsense due to several things:
1) Valuation of coins that have minimum trading volume (e.g. sometimes even sub $1000) in 24 hours as in several millions of market cap.
2) Counting centralized, corporation issued tokens such as XRP. This one is nonsensical
3) It's BTC, the digital gold up against several thousands of altcoins in that metric.

We are back above $1600 on Bitstamp. Why is everyone so quiet?



224. Post 18936261 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Good morning gentlemen. Is Bitcoin about to go crazy whilst alt start going down? I'm quite surprised that it's almost at $1700 on Bitstamp. Here's some data:

Quote
Bitstamp | There are currently 1288.2105 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 2346384.55943 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0161 seconds
Bitfinex | There are currently 3827.5193 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 7116497.61397 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0050 seconds
Premium of Bitfinex over Bitstamp is currently 3.16962648336 %.



225. Post 18936445 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: Denker on May 09, 2017, 07:42:07 AM
Today is big shitcoin bleeding right?! Good good! These guys have to learn it the hard way. BTC King will continue ruling them all! Grin Wink
Price is around $1764 over at coinmarketcap. I'm just curious if this is the beginning of the big altcoin dump and Bitcoin's huge slingshot to $2000+.
It looks like almost all of them are bleeding; take a look:



We hit $1700 on Bitstamp!



226. Post 18938491 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

A moment of silence for Proffesor Bitkorn:



Quote from: Denker on May 09, 2017, 09:53:20 AM
The ETF was already rejected once! Just because bats lets it review again by the SEC doesn't mean anybody here is expecting something. It will get rejected a second time with 99% certainty. All market participants know this.That's why another rejection won't have any significant impact on the price.
I don't see an ETF denial having a significant effect, especially not as last time. An ETF approval would make this bull market go full crazy. Do keep in mind that the commission consists of different people now, so the chance for rejection is not 99%.



227. Post 18949918 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

It seems that $1700 is holding so far, even after several attempted dumps. I like the positive sentiment. Here's some fresh data for you to chew on:

Quote
Bitstamp | There are currently 1490.4603 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 2741373.72085 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0277 seconds
Bitfinex | There are currently 2550.0824 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 4754053.94411 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0043 seconds

Quote
Premium of Bitfinex over Bitstamp is currently 2.10157618214 %.



228. Post 18969716 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Another day, another ATH. Time for a small break and then again towards $2k territory?

Quote
Bitstamp | There are currently 1120.7207 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 2163412.25572 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0729 seconds
Bitfinex | There are currently 1550.4028 bitcoins offered at or under 2000.0 USD, worth 3020973.22206 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0042 seconds
Premium of Bitfinex over Bitstamp is currently 1.25057149773 %.
Very low volatility as well:





229. Post 18985086 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):



Was this everything that the bears got? If it remains around or above $1800 for a bit longer, I'm sure that we are going to see >$2000 very soon. Although that may be considered a "psychological barrier" and may cause some profit taking. Jimbo, where are you?



230. Post 18993751 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

My Bitcoins are only up ~36% in 30 days, time to panic? Get real people. Roll Eyes








231. Post 19014450 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: Paashaas on May 14, 2017, 08:02:39 AM
Impressive rebound to 'normal' so fast  Shocked
I must say that it is. My own "best-case" scenario was sticking above $1700 for a while, but here we are already around $1800. Prepare for the negative comments of the people who sold at the bottom though. Cheesy

Quote from: bitserve on May 14, 2017, 08:53:16 AM
But it was a daily volatility of around 5-15% . At this heights, we need to get used to relate it to its percentage change and not the single dollars change. Imagine when Bitcoin prices in the several thousands.
The volatility is pretty low nowadays. Historical volatility is less than 3%.



232. Post 19014832 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: Nagadota on May 14, 2017, 09:21:21 AM
True, but the particular way that it's volatile may scare a lot of weak hands and institutional investors who are used to more stable growth. 
You are telling me things that I have known for years. I don't really care about people led by emotions such as the two types listed by you.

Quote from: Nagadota on May 14, 2017, 09:21:21 AM
Bitcoin volatility is kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy - people get scared of the volatility which makes them panic sell/buy, making it more volatile.
I can agree with this.

Quote from: kurious on May 14, 2017, 09:37:59 AM
Low?  It's only low compared to alts - compared to stocks, currencies, PMs, commodities.... it doesn't look it!
You do realize that it recently, albeit briefly, had a lower volatility than the Euro? Anything sub 5% in the historic volatility (as per that website) is great. Furthermore, Bitcoin seems to be on the track to reach standard currency volatility.




233. Post 19036421 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: 2017Bubble on May 15, 2017, 06:10:34 PM
Everyone expecting a dump due ETF, would be funny if they denied it and pump it to
Speaking of the ETF, does anyone know where I should be looking for the news?



234. Post 19037416 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: droizs on May 15, 2017, 06:21:09 PM
Here: https://www.sec.gov/news/pressreleases
Thanks. I expected some other source though.

Quote from: European Central Bank on May 15, 2017, 06:38:04 PM
do some reading folks.

https://www.scribd.com/document/346334662/34-80511#fullscreen&from_embed

all that happens today is the end of the comment period.
I genuinely thought that this was not the case. Thanks for sharing.

Quote from: Karpeles on May 15, 2017, 07:28:30 PM
Then what is the deadline for a decision?
If what I've read is true, there is no deadline on a decision for an appeal.



235. Post 19054960 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Qartada on May 16, 2017, 09:24:26 PM
Even arguments about the size of the transaction are meaningless now.  The smallest transactions you could do still have a fee of >$1.
No. This remains constant. Fee is determined by the size + recommended fee-rate. It always has been. That put aside, there is a massive spam attack again. Mempool jumped by over 100-150k in <24 hours.



In case that TA isn't a lie. Source. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_tvXDnXcAA4G55.jpg:large



236. Post 19059427 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Definitely impressive and unexpected movement today. Maybe it is time to start building support above $1800?

Quote from: Searing on May 17, 2017, 06:35:08 AM
Any clue on why the pump now? Or is it just 'bitcoin being bitcoin"
Not every movement upwards is a pump nor is every movement downwards a dump. Please stop using those words inappropriately.

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on May 17, 2017, 06:08:08 AM
2000$ soon?
That would be nice.



237. Post 19079162 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Ibian on May 18, 2017, 12:10:26 PM
Really, increasing the block size seems to have no drawbacks to me.
Then you do not understand anything. Let's start with the crucial one:
1) DoS attack vector due to quadratic validation time O(n^2) at 2 MB. You are able to construct a transaction/block that takes longer than 10 minutes to validate, essentially preventing others from catching-up to you.
2) Increased orphan rates.
3) Increased node centralization/decreased node count.
4) Increased mining centralization (direct effect of the 2 above).
5) Risk of chain-split.

There's probably more, but these are the first ones that come into mind.

Quote from: Ibian on May 18, 2017, 12:14:48 PM
Just keep the blocksize the same.
Explain.
You can scale Bitcoin to a fair extent without modifying the block size. Segwit -> Schnorr + Signature aggregation -> LN/sidechains/TumbleBit/Mimblewimble.

I just noticed this wall at Bitstamp:





238. Post 19081254 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: soullyG on May 18, 2017, 02:27:05 PM
$1900 at Finex again, $8 short of ATH  Shocked
Another day, another ATH. Meanwhile, true Bitcoin holders be like:



On the other side of the Spectrum, "altcoin bagholders", "propagandists", and "paid shills" are like: "Look at the mempool!!! Bitcoin is dead!". Roll Eyes

I'll get a little excited if we break $2k on Bitstamp and stay there.



239. Post 19081432 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: craked5 on May 18, 2017, 02:49:51 PM
still, not a little excited about the price always coming back? Grin
No. However, I don't like it retracing too much which is why I want support to start building after a certain point has been reached rather than hoping for "moon".

Quote from: Paashaas on May 18, 2017, 02:55:48 PM
You can scale Bitcoin to a fair extent without modifying the block size. Segwit -> Schnorr + Signature aggregation -> LN/sidechains/TumbleBit/Mimblewimble.
This is exactly what Bitcoin needs, the only one who's blocking it is that anoying little brat called Jihan Wu.





240. Post 19082607 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: spooderman on May 18, 2017, 02:58:24 PM
UASF is a peaceful way to counter an aggressive attack.
Indeed. UASF is a pretty decent method for deploying a network upgrade if you have or several actors maliciously aligned against you (i.e. the super majority of the system). An alternative method for deploying Segwit would be a combination of BIP9 and UASF which is BIP8.

Quote from: JimboToronto on May 18, 2017, 03:56:07 PM
It's been exactly a week since our last ATH. It's about time for another.
It really depends on where you are currently looking at. Bitfinex has hit a new ATH today. Bitstamp is +- 30$ from its ATH.



241. Post 19085998 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Is this a mini battle of the walls?



Quote from: Torque on May 18, 2017, 08:33:08 PM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-05-18/brazil-stock-market-halted-after-plunging-10-what-happens-next
Then someone comes up to me and tells me that Bitcoin is volatilize. Roll Eyes



242. Post 19105990 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

I am really surprised with the current price and am looking forward to reaching $2000 on Bitstamp. I just hope that it doesn't make a very strong backwards movement afterwards.

Quote from: steelboy on May 20, 2017, 06:38:15 AM
Stamp/Finex spread just £5! Spring coiling before we get to 2k I think.  Wink
This is interesting as Finex has yet to solve their issues AFAIK.

It's time to post my favorite gif into this thread again:





243. Post 19113466 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: spooderman on May 20, 2017, 05:05:09 PM
what's the sentiment here about the price action coming up to and after Aug 1st when UASF kicks in?
If UASF becomes a sucess, i.e. Segwit + LN become operable on Bitcoin, I'd expect the price to be anywhere between $5000 - $10 000 shortly after. The effect of Segwit & LN on Litecoin (which did not require it as far as throughput is concerned; but it does fix a lot of things) is undeniable.

I see some desperate bears. The spread between Bitstamp and Finex has increased again.




244. Post 19113962 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):



This is the video: https://youtu.be/J_Y-4ox28uY?t=3. It was up much longer than gifs usually are.

Bearstamp is still fighting with its walls.



245. Post 19115951 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: cmacwiz on May 20, 2017, 08:50:55 PM
C'mon bitstamp, my body is ready. 430 coins to $2k/BTC, and the final citadel of the bear will fall
It has fallen already.



Another, smaller, ~170 coin wall is up again. Resistance is futile.



246. Post 19135257 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: BitcoinNewsMagazine on May 22, 2017, 04:48:47 AM
Let's hope it's a true compromise. Something like Segwit with BIP100 (or similar) would ensure this clusterfuck is far less likely to occur in the future. A very conservative system to increase the base blocksize over time, and Segwit to get lightning networks rolling. That's what I think should happen, but I'm bound to be wrong  Roll Eyes
It feels like this is the compromise everyone is excited about http://moneyandstate.com/thoughts-on-segwit2mb/ guess we will know later this AM
A few more hours to go. Meanwhile:



Such a pleasant sight.



247. Post 19147898 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):




If pushing the price briefly twice under $2100 is everything that they have/the *correction*, then I will see you gentlemen between $3 and $5k soon.



248. Post 19173662 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):



Gif on Bitconity for hitting $2400 on Bitstamp. Congratulations gentlemen. The party is just begging.

Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | There are currently 686.08679 bitcoins offered at or under 2500.0 USD, worth 1680587.53337 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0147 seconds
<gribble> Bitfinex | There are currently 1465.2011 bitcoins offered at or under 2500.0 USD, worth 3536948.89863 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0044 seconds



249. Post 19196518 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

The only correct technical analysis of the Bitcoin market:





250. Post 19220708 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):



The blood bath has started. How many times will Bitcoin be declared dead after this one? Cheesy



251. Post 19305727 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Does anyone else think that $2500 is likely for today?

Quote
Bitstamp | There are currently 843.31953 bitcoins offered at or under 2500.0 USD, worth 2087552.74752 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0236 seconds
Bitstamp | There are currently 2328.4616 bitcoins offered at or under 3000.0 USD, worth 6102127.45442 USD in total. | Data vintage: 5.2647 seconds

The Chinese are back:


I still wonder why the premium on the OTC market is this much higher than the current market rate. Right now it is enjoying a 100% premium: https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GBTC/quote



252. Post 19390469 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 06, 2017, 05:45:19 AM
One of us here is NLC, it's like the hunt for satoshi, it will never end
After banning hundreds of bots, and some deep infiltrators who were actually NLC (one was even helping me with reports at the time!), I am positive that he's still around in this very thread.

Back to the topic at hand, this surge has definitely surprised me. I knew that after so many attempts at breaking $2600 we were going higher. We are just about borderline to the "too fast too soon". I have prepared a dance for once we hit $3k.



253. Post 19390619 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 06, 2017, 05:58:26 AM
^^There, Lauda knows I wasn't him.
No, not at all. You were one of prime suspects for being NLC. To this day, I still suspect you due to the absurdity sometimes found in your posts.

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 06, 2017, 05:59:19 AM
... oh, do tell, what's it like? Tango, moonwalk, waltz?
It's a small gif; the dance of my species. Not anything particular, just a *out of joy* dance. It shall be posted after $3k has been breached. I do not expect this to take much longer though. At this rate it could be sometime this week, heck even today!



254. Post 19480904 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on June 10, 2017, 06:35:17 PM
The only thing that can possibly stop ETH in my opinion is another hack worse than the first. I think it is more likely that in 10 years ETH will be king and we will all look back and the reasons will be obvious as to why.
Well, enjoy your corporation & government controlled "money" which isn't actually supposed to be P2P money nor digital gold. ETH and Bitcoin differ, albeit people who are greedy want them to compete for said reasons. It will suffer even greater scalability issues, and it has a "de-facto" king Vitalik who decides where it is going and what will be done. I came to Bitcoin because of the original vision of cryptocurrencies, which is decentralization and whatever came with it. If you think that "ETH" is the "de-facto" money making machine, then you are delusional yourself. Much higher ROI can be found elsewhere. Anyhow, there are already superior coins to ETH in the works, e.g. Byteball.

That off-topic, ETH shitcoin shilling put aside: Someone seems to dislike the thought of $2900 in Western exchanges. China is constitently pushing towards $3k.
Quote
Bitstamp BTCUSD last: 2871.53, vol: 8871.32717327 | BTC-E BTCUSD last: 2814.799, vol: 4544.12646 | Bitfinex BTCUSD last: 2831.6, vol: 12651.23545533 | GDAX BTCUSD last: 2881.01, vol: 15282.4883681 | BTCChina BTCUSD last: 2985.785786, vol: 10908.95090000 | Kraken BTCUSD last: 2850.12, vol: 5121.81429577 | Gemini BTCUSD last: 2849.97, vol: 6355.3889021 | OKCoin BTCUSD last: 2993.461464,

Quote
Bitstamp | There are currently 948.98854 bitcoins offered at or under 3000.0 USD, worth 2805809.9107 USD in total. | Data vintage: 2.3874 seconds
Bitfinex | There are currently 1723.2351 bitcoins offered at or under 3000.0 USD, worth 5054460.387 USD in total. | Data vintage: 0.0049 seconds



255. Post 19576441 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: ImI on June 15, 2017, 01:39:46 PM
An "idiot"? LOL, OK what part is "idiotic"?

Did they sign the agreement? Yes.

Did it say SW+2MB? Yes.

Did Maxwell and others openly state just hours after they signed it "We dont care."  Yes.

So what part is misleading?
Are you stupid and spreading false information? Yes.
"Core" signed nothing, and there is no such thing as "Core" when considering a singular entity. A few contributors to Bitcoin Core went to that meeting as individuals, thinking it was a good idea. They all signed it as individuals. Gmaxwell was not even part of that group and criticized the agreement right after it was made public. FYI: F2Pool broke it by mining a Bitcoin Classic block, thus the agreement was void at that point.

Quote from: monbux on June 15, 2017, 01:44:08 PM
Finally, something who is using their brain! Kind of disappointing how many pages I had to read through to find a decent post though..
No. ImI is absolutely wrong and uninformed.

You can thank JihanCoin for this price decline. Weirdly enough, it happened just 1 day before I needed some cash. Roll Eyes Scaling is a minuscule problem compared to ASIC monopoly and the mining cartel.



256. Post 19576630 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: ImI on June 15, 2017, 01:54:29 PM
We had an agreement already and (like you also correctly stated) this agreement got neglected by Maxwell, Friedenbach and others just hours after the other Core devs signed it. So who is to blame for that mess? Why opt out of SW+2MB?
In hindsight, the agreement was a bad idea. As said, F2Pool broke it thus it was void. You can't blame anyone for not delivering their end of a deal that was void.

Quote from: ImI on June 15, 2017, 01:54:29 PM
If there is no such thing as a unity called "Core" then you will never be getting closer to any agreement as they where in the beginning of 2016.
Do you even understand Bitcoin? If you want proof-by-proxy then either go to Barrycoin or Jihancoin. No "groups" of any kind decide changes to the consensus rules.

Quote from: ImI on June 15, 2017, 01:55:51 PM
Luke? Luke states to this very day that 0.5Mb is enough. LOL
He has his reasons. Regardless, he is a very good developer. Better than any single kid from the BU team.

Quote from: Nekrobios on June 15, 2017, 01:53:45 PM
Strong hands hodl USD now.
Why would you hodl dirty fiat?



257. Post 19576982 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: ImI on June 15, 2017, 02:04:54 PM
Oh, i understand Bitcoin very well. Bitcoin relies on a consensus-mechanism called "Proof of Work" and as such it's the miners that effectively decide what happens. You don't like it? OK, but what other consensus-mechanism do you propose? "Proof of Node"? "Proof of Reddit Account"?

You see you are right that Bitcoin means NO backdoor decisions, yes. But then you should also understand that in the Bitcoin ecosystem it's PoW that decides and nothing else.
No. Your understanding of Bitcoin is completely flawed and you need to stop shilling (I do not imply that you are paid; just posting supportive nonsense) for Ver/Bitmain/BU. They are the sole reason for which we are in the state that we find ourselves today. "Miners do not decide what happens". That is not a consensus-mechanism. Any kind of change that is done by a miner, and not backed up by widespread consensus creates an altcoin. Regardless of the hashrate. If Bitmain wants to test the users and developers, then it s possible to go full nuclear and change the algorithm completely. You need to stop worshiping people who have contributed almost nothing to the development of Bitcoin (code wise).

Quote from: spooderman on June 15, 2017, 02:09:56 PM
And who decides if the PoW is valid?
These fools have fatal understanding of Bitcoin, e.g. with things like "the longest chain is Bitcoin" without even understanding what they mean. The longest chain with the most amount of work, following the existing consensus rules is Bitcoin1. If Bitmain forks away themselves, they are creating an altcoin. The same goes for any kind of proof-of-proxy "backdoor agreements".

Quote from: spooderman on June 15, 2017, 02:09:56 PM
Just bought a BTC. Let's hope I caught the bottom Cheesy
I do hope we've hit the bottom.

1 - This isn't the full definition of it, but mostly directed at the false understanding that "the longest chain" == Bitcoin regardless of the ruleset.
@monbux: If you need education/consulting, hit me up. I usually don't offer it for free, but I'll make an exception for a member such as yourself.



258. Post 19577641 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 02:44:50 PM
Luke? Luke states to this very day that 0.5Mb is enough. LOL
He has his reasons.
Yeah, he wants to hurt the entire bitcoin ecosystem because he is a narcissistic prick. That's not a fucking good reason. That or he is just an uninformed retard, doesn't really make a difference.
I fully disagree. Luke-jr is a honest small blocker and has been consistent with his view for a long time. Anyhow: 1) He has had very decent contributions to the code. 2) He has written that HF proposal that increases the block size eventually.

Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 02:50:48 PM
So you agree that 0.5 mb blocks are enough? That's your position?
No reasonable amount, which would not fully centralized Bitcoin, is enough. Increasing the block size != improving scalability. Segwit -> Schnorr + signature aggregation are a very nice step. For those that do not know, and I'm sure ImI is part of those, the latter requires 1 signature for inputs from the same address. This means that TXs pulling out a lot of inputs from the same one would be very small in size in comparison to today. The bonus side effect of this improvement is not only capacity, but also the incentive to consolidate UTXO. Block size increases make sense, to a certain degree. However, kicking the can that way does nothing but set precedence for "weak/lazy scaling" and centralization. Let's have actual improvements, like those mentions and Weak blocks, before we do this?

Bottom reached?



259. Post 19577757 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 02:58:09 PM
Waiting for his very good reason to halve the transaction volume.
He is not advocating 0.5 MB anymore. You're confused. He's supporting BIP148, i.e. Segwit which is essentially a size up to 4 MB.

Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 02:58:09 PM
Increasing the block size != improving scalability.
Of course it is. More people means more value, and right now we are at about the limit of what the network can support. It's too basic to even talk about here, or at least it should be.
No. I take it you have not studied any area of computer science? Increasing raw throughput does not mean improving scalability. This is me, talking to you, whilst ignoring the 2 MB DoS risk due to quadratic hashing time (I'll let you guess which proposal also aims to fix this but is being blocked by a cartel Roll Eyes ).

Quote from: lemmyK on June 15, 2017, 02:56:06 PM
https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.09258    
In Bitcoin, the only vulnerable algorithm (at this time) would be ECDSA. The plan is to move to Schnorr anyways and Segwit makes this move easier.

Back to price talk?



260. Post 19577818 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 03:03:52 PM
Increasing raw throughput does not mean improving scalability.
It does with bitcoin. Twice the size in the same 10 minute blocks=twice the throughput. Basic fucking first grade stuff.
No. You are uneducated about these concepts, i.e. you don't even know that scalability actually means. If you are not willing to listen and learn, then I will no longer be wasting my time on you.

Quote from: JimboToronto on June 15, 2017, 03:04:20 PM
Do you think this correction is done yet? It's still not as deep as the one from May 25-27. It would have to go below $2k do match that.
It is not just a correction. I take it you have missed the Bitmain announcement/threat? I do not want it to go any lower, at least not yet.



261. Post 19578072 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 03:13:57 PM
Your habit of starting everything you say with something about your own intellectual superiority is a bad one.
Consider this: 99.9% of the people that one encountered in the past year or so, are either inferior by knowledge or intellect and claiming they "know" or "understand" stuff whilst propagating completely flawed knowledge to others (which is damaging on its own). Therefore, you should understand.

Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 03:13:57 PM
If you don't wanna explain what you mean it's better not to.
I explained it to you with a rather lengthy paragraph. You've just dismissed it and continued posting the same nonsense.

Quote from: Lauda on June 15, 2017, 02:54:33 PM
No reasonable amount, which would not fully centralized Bitcoin, is enough. Increasing the block size != improving scalability. Segwit -> Schnorr + signature aggregation are a very nice step. For those that do not know, and I'm sure ImI is part of those, the latter requires 1 signature for inputs from the same address. This means that TXs pulling out a lot of inputs from the same one would be very small in size in comparison to today. The bonus side effect of this improvement is not only capacity, but also the incentive to consolidate UTXO. Block size increases make sense, to a certain degree. However, kicking the can that way does nothing but set precedence for "weak/lazy scaling" and centralization. Let's have actual improvements, like those mentions and Weak blocks, before we do this?
Scaling does not just mean more throughput on the main chain. Adding more throughput by increasing the block size is absolutely not equal to "improving scalability". An example of improving scalability would be enabling more throughput by using the same amount of resources. Signature aggregation, as described above, would be an example of such. Another way of imporving scalability is reducing resource cost, which is what Segwit does in part with it's sighash (trying to scale down the quadratic validation time to linear, which would also mitigate the DoS attack vector of a raw block size increase). There are also some other examples, but this should give you a general idea.

I am absolutely positive that we would have been somewhere above $5k, and pretty stable, had Segwit activated in January or February.



262. Post 19578298 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 03:24:19 PM
And another example of scalability is to increase the blocksize. Increasing the network capacity is far more relevant than the precise mechanism to achieve it. You don't simply get to pretend that one definition of a word you keep using is invalid.
Here we go again, no argument to refuse anything and continual looping of false knowledge. Unfortunately, theymos is too liberal and his forum policy tolerates bullshit and all kinds of misleading information.

Quote from: Lauda on June 15, 2017, 03:19:33 PM
Adding more throughput by increasing the block size is absolutely not equal to "improving scalability".
There is a DoS attack vector at 2 MB that can be malicious exploited, especially by a mining cartel. It seems like you are heavily uninformed. Maybe less r/btc time next time snowflake? Roll Eyes

Quote from: spooderman on June 15, 2017, 03:22:05 PM
Lauda doing God's work as always.
It seems to be pointless with some people. Reminds me of Flat Earth believers or the Anti-Vaccination movement. "You are an expert, what do you know? I have a right to have my own opinion!!"

Quote from: Dabs on June 15, 2017, 03:28:37 PM
You may think it scales linearly, and that's not really a good idea on its own.
Signature hashing is quadratic not linear.

Quote from: arubi
imo the most basic "unit" of scale is amount of inputs and outputs that can be processed.  if we want to improve how many in->outs we can process, we need to make that action of turning an input to an output as cheap\easy as possible for validators



263. Post 19578698 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Let's clear up some misconceptions:
1) Increasing the block size limit does not improve scalability. It does provide more throughput, but Bitcoin scales the same way. The current flawed design makes it actually scaled quadratically (signature hashing). A good example for this would be the Towers of Hanoi with 3 levels (1 MB) and e.g. Towers of Hanoi with 5 levels (as 2 MB). Try it.
2) Increasing the block size limit is not a change of 1 line of code. This has been a false myth being spread by people who don't even understand what they are preaching. You can't just magically put that number into your client. It needs additional code for: 1) Activation method/threshold. 2) Replay/DoS protection. 3) Tests.
3) There is a present DoS attack risk at 2 MB due to point 2. Read: https://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=522
4) A block size increase is a solution. Whilst I do not aim to dismiss the throughput increase, this is not a solution of any kind. If a mallicious attacker wanted to, they could fill these block up over night. Either that, or you could get enough demand that would fill it up very quickly. You will end up asking for X MB afterwards, which would further centralized Bitcoin whilst not improving scalability.


Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 03:46:36 PM
The messenger is very important when the messenger is an obvious sophist. Not you, just to clarify.
I am not a sophist of any kind. 99% of my posts are true and I welcome anyone with better knowledge. I am also not even paid to combat the false knowledge, shills and whatnot whilst being very sure (and not referring to you) that certain institutions and groups are actively paying people to spread fake information in regards to Bitcoin, especially scaling.

Quote from: JimboToronto on June 15, 2017, 03:39:26 PM
You're right. I was too busy yesterday to even check in. Today I woke up, saw the price and ran out to buy.

So it's hard fork panic part two? Jeezuz Murphy. I'm looking into it.

Sigh.
It seems that Bitmain wants to self-destruct themselves or they are unable to admit being wrong (or may blame BIP148 for the damage created by "Jihan Activated Hard fork"). Actually, if they do what they threaten the network with, there is a chance for 3 chains:
BIP148
Legacy chain
Jihancoin.

Can you guess which one I will be dumping? Cheesy



264. Post 19579113 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 04:05:53 PM
Using terms like "malicious attacker" doesn't convey any useful information, it's an attempt to make people feel a certain way about the topic being discussed. And that is what makes you a sophist.
With statements like these you just look like an outright idiot that can not admit to being wrong. Does this remind us of some individuals? I'll give you a hint, one starts with a R and with a J. Debunking your correction easily:

Quote from: Lauda on June 15, 2017, 03:53:24 PM
If [someone] wanted to, they could fill these block up over night [by spending a lot of money on fees].
What fees? No congestion = very low fees or no fees at all.

Quote from: Lauda on June 15, 2017, 03:53:24 PM
Either that, or you could get enough demand that would fill it up very quickly [which is both what we want and why we need it].
Let me get this straight: You want to put further centralization pressure on Bitcoin with 2 MB blocks and you hope that they get filled right away so you can demand even more centralization pressure for more throughput? Roll Eyes

Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 04:05:53 PM
You will end up asking for X MB afterwards, which would further centralized Bitcoin whilst not improving [efficiency].
A block size increase is not an improvement.

Quote from: Ibian on June 15, 2017, 04:05:53 PM
Anyone has the right to send any amount of transactions they want for any reason or no reason, that's one of the main points about bitcoin. No middlemen regulating what is allowed.
Let's stick our head into the send and ignore malicious individuals who do not do any kind of financial transactions nor valid data storage, but just create transactions for the sake of spamming. Wake up. These kinds of stupid statements make you look like a government shill.

Quote from: Dabs on June 15, 2017, 03:58:13 PM
Wow, so I can almost triple my money? .... kidding. Smiley
You wouldn't 'triple your money' if people actually listened to engineers and not business men or laymen like Ibian. You'd probably see a tenfold increase. Smiley

Quote from: spooderman on June 15, 2017, 04:02:08 PM
Jimbo, do you buy from BTMs? You're always "rushing out to buy." In which case, holy commission batman?
IIRC he did state once that he buys from BTMs.



265. Post 20050003 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: FractalUniverse on July 10, 2017, 05:32:31 AM
+1
But kitten pics are too few!

Don't abuse my photo! Angry

Quote from: Denker on July 10, 2017, 02:35:11 PM
A bit of blood in the streets today.
The shitcoin bubble has yet to truly burst.

Quote from: Denker on July 10, 2017, 02:35:11 PM
May be another good opportunity to get some cheap BTC.
Are you sure that we are not heading into times where the opportunity is going to get better?



266. Post 20064310 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Anyone else enjoying the blood bath? Real Bitcoin holders remain unaffected.



The Bitcoin price is holding pretty nicely in comparison to the *rest*.



267. Post 20066251 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Denker on July 11, 2017, 08:54:32 AM
No problem here. I will sit it out as usual and try to accumulate more BTC. Will be interesting to see where the bottom will be this time. For now I don't think we've reached it so far. Altcoins holders will have to suffer much much more.They gonna learn it the very hard way!
Indeed. The good part of a longer bear market is the chance of getting more BTC.

Quote from: starmman on July 11, 2017, 09:32:11 AM
I'm currently about 20% down over the last 3 days - but actually loving all this volatility
I have absolutely no idea how down I am, and I do not care. The Bitcoin price holding over $2000 is pretty great.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 11, 2017, 09:38:31 AM
Looks like at some point, we might begin to witness an opposite correlation of BTC and the unnamed coin... .hahahaha.. unnamed.
But someone told me that unnamed coin is the future Huh Huh Cheesy

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 11, 2017, 09:38:31 AM
Anyhow, we had been seeing a kind of less extreme movement of BTC, but possibly at some point, some of these folks are going to realize that bitcoin is holding and increasing in value while various shit coins are losing value... go figure?  Wonder where I should put my money?  lifeline for rocket scientist?  
The only truth right now: Bitcoin is the only coin with any actual fundamentals and widespread adoption. The rest are purely speculative or scams.



268. Post 20146722 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: micalith on July 15, 2017, 05:58:42 AM
I followed that link, then listened to https://soundcloud.com/heryptohow/roger-ver-on-craig-wrights-the-future-of-bitcoin-speech. I must say that he has a fair point regarding scaling. I would agree with him, but I certainly don't like the prospect of less decentralisation due to more expensive node tech.
If you think that, then you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about and you're being bamboozled. Roger Ver has absolutely zero credibility when it comes to technicalities, and CW is a scammer. Both have fundamental misunderstanding of SegWit and scaling in general. What their actual agenda is, besides centralization/corporate takeover, is debatable.

Quote from: micalith on July 15, 2017, 05:58:42 AM
I guess it's down to a choice between two compromises.
It's a choice between an actual improvement and one that does nothing besides give a little throughput and centralization.

Quote from: micalith on July 15, 2017, 05:58:42 AM
edit: the only way to avoid a split that I can think of is to accept Segwit2x for now, then get consensus for much bigger block size over the next year...
Again, you have no idea what you're talking about. Segwit2x, aka FrankenSegwit, with their ever changing proposal wants to do a flag day fork in November this year.

Quote from: kurious on July 15, 2017, 08:06:45 AM
If you do have fiat, set sub 2000 bids up.  I did a week ago.

Can't see it holding all the way to the 1st at this rate whatever happens.  And if Segwit signalling doesn't look close at the end of the month it will get messier still; you may be looking at today's price with a wistful nostalgic sigh.
You think that the current movements are entirely related to Segwit and BIP 148 / Segwit2x?



269. Post 20169356 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

I think it is fair to say, looking back, that this may be of the biggest buying opportunities above $1k. Moon would be easily reachable if we didn't have malicious agents trying to centralize the system. Roll Eyes

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on July 16, 2017, 01:26:16 PM
I am already panic buying lol.
I am calling a maximum potential low of $1500. However, I do not see a reason for which the price is dropping this sharply this weekend. If people were scared of August the 1st, dumping a few weeks ago made more sense (not 2 weeks before); not that there is something to be afraid of.



270. Post 20171949 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: bones261 on July 16, 2017, 02:07:15 PM
I think it's starting to sink in with some people that FrankenSegwit may not come out with sound code; and with it's planned Hardfork, come November, it's just kicking the can down the road a little for another major forking threat.
It has horrible code. One of the hardcoded seeds is basically an anti-privacy (chain analysis) company by Garzik.  Roll Eyes

Quote from: bitserve on July 16, 2017, 02:54:20 PM
Weak hands are not afraid of 1st Agust, as you said they would have sold earlier. Weak hands are dumping because they are afraid of the dumping other weak hands started. That's all.
In other words: Speculating on possible negative scenarios?

Quote from: becoin on July 16, 2017, 03:10:34 PM
The biggest bubbles of our time are the dollar, the euro, the yen, the pound... When they pop bitcoin price will be measured in hundreds of thousands.
What's the point of Bitcoin being worth $100k if those $100k are almost worthless? If all traditional currencies collapse, then we will have to fundamentally change how we value Bitcoin.



271. Post 20202668 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

So, have we entered full reversal mode yet? It seems to me that occasionally a wall pops up to push the price back into the *right* direction.

FrankenSegwit isn't as great as you think. If it prevents a split on August the 1st, that will definitely be a good sign. However, we will experience the same problems again before their flag day HF.



272. Post 20205711 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: spiderbrain on July 18, 2017, 04:02:17 AM
What IS that big Bitstamp wall up to..?
I hope for a full retracement, but will not be certain of it until we are above $2500. A lot of money could have been easily made in the last couple of days, for those who trade smart.

Quote from: Meuh6879 on July 18, 2017, 07:27:35 AM
hint : BIP91 is not a bitcoin core feature or policy.
It doesn't provide a way to activate SegWit.
It does activate Segwit. You have a fundamental misunderstanding if you think that it does not. BIP91 will start orphaning non-SW signalling blocks after it has 80% of the blocks for 72 hours (IIRC). This means that the traditional activation mechanism will see a spike to 95% (BIP9) which requires 2 weeks to lock in Segwit, and then another 2 weeks to activate it.

Quote from: bitserve on July 18, 2017, 07:43:13 AM
Correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that the following scenario is the most plausible:
- BIP91 locks-in
- BIP148 probably doesn't lock-in because of not reaching 95% consensus... but then UASF comes into place forcing BIP148
- BIP91 and BIP148 both support segwit, so both implementations are compatible and don't orphan each others blocks
- Profit
No. That is also fundamentally wrong. BIP91, after locking in and triggering will orphan any non-Segwit signalling blocks, which is the same that BIP148 starts doing on August the 1st. As long as BIP91 locks-in before August the 1st, there is not going to be a fork on that day.
UASF is BIP148, or to be more precise: BIP148 is an implementation of UASF. BIP148 does not need 95% consensus (this number was never associated with it).



273. Post 20207750 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: bitserve on July 18, 2017, 08:01:37 AM
That is even better. As long as miners stick to THEIR OWN roadmap we will all be fine... And with all the weak hands shaken during this last correction the rise after all the uncertainty dissapears could be impressive.
The only reason that I somewhat like BIP91 is because it can (and possibly will) prevent the split on August the 1st. The latter part of it, i.e. the hard fork, may end up being a disaster (if it happens).

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 18, 2017, 08:16:20 AM
Sounds like you are experiencing some regrets, Lauda?

I execute trades every $50, and everything went pretty smooth with me, except for a mistake that I made at $1859.  For some reason I sold twice at $1859, when I thought that I was executing buy orders.. I still cannot figure out what I did exactly, so in order to recover, I had set buy orders to buy back my mistake at $1840 and $1820, but alas, we never returned to those prices.. at least so far.
No. I am not a trader, or at least not a day trader. I can't bother to move cold storage funds to an exchange for these swings and trading with a few thousand USD is waste of time for me. So, you didn't manage to buy back in yet? I certainly did expect it to spiral down that much, that quickly.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 18, 2017, 08:16:20 AM
Oh .. and thanks for you clarification of BIP91 and BIP148.  It seems that however many times these explanations are repeated, there are further opportunities for confusion proliferation, which can come from the content of one or two erroneous posts...
I'm somewhat inclined to say that it's rather much simpler than people claim it is, but that may be cognitive bias. The problem with it is that 'what can' and 'what will' happen keeps changing. It is still not definite that a split will be prevented. The odds just keep changing.



274. Post 20263934 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

I was away for a bit, thus was out of the loop. I was very surprised when my phone was vibrating today, several times (my settings aren't too sensitive though). Unless something goes really wrong, BIP91 is locking in this period. This means that there will be no chain split on August the 1st whatsoever (no BIP148, "UAHF", etc.). Segwit is to activate near the end of August. Anyone want to place some bets on the price then?

By coincidence (?), today is Moon Day. It is time for this gif again:




275. Post 20285195 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

The current ATH for Bitstamp is $2980. We got very close to it yesterday, but the price was going way too quickly and was not sustainable. I think that a new number may be possible, very shortly. Therefore:
New ATH: July 24. 2017 (even if entries can't have the same date?).
Reason: BIP91 activates in ~250 blocks and the reached price yesterday.

In case that some people have not noticed it yet:

Quote from: Lauda on July 21, 2017, 09:57:56 AM
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pool/btccom
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pool/antpool
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pool/viabtc
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pool/btctop

All of these have started to signal Segwit. BIP148 working as intended.



276. Post 20397934 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on July 26, 2017, 09:57:24 AM
This is the month of max FUD. Not everyone gets to survive.
It does seem like it, doesn't it? UAHF, Bitcoin ABC, Bitcoin Cash, Alphabay and Hans seized, Bitmixer gone, BTC-e suddenly down. Roll Eyes

Quote from: bitserve on July 26, 2017, 12:01:05 PM
And Bitmixer ceases operations with some "weird" statement like he has just now realized that mixers are bad for Bitcoin.

Something is happening... not necessarily a bad thing though.
"Something". Anything centralized and illegal which grows that big eventually will get found and shut down. That's for sure. However, this is a non issue with the rise of decentralized solutions, e.g. JoinMarket and Tumblebit. They are superior to mixers anyways.

Quote from: soullyG on July 26, 2017, 12:50:44 PM
Possibly related to the BTC-e debacle?

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-greece-russia-arrest-idUSKBN1AB1OP
Quote
Greek police arrested a Russian man suspected of running a money laundering operation involving turning $4 billion from illicit business activities into the digital currency bitcoin, they said on Wednesday.
Speculation like that often only leads to panic. It is possibly as the story would fit, but I wouldn't place any bets on it yet.

I wonder how much BTC-e going down has affected the price.



277. Post 20632177 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Starving_Marvin on August 05, 2017, 07:21:03 AM
Didn't Goldman sucks speak of BTC going up to $ 3.600 rather than 3.900?
Why stop there? If the flag day fork in November is avoided $5 to $10k seems reasonable.

I said I'd post a special gif of myself once we surpass $3000, and this was quite some time ago (I think it was around the first time we hit 29xx on Bitstamp). Here it is:





278. Post 20634196 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: HanvanBitcoin on August 05, 2017, 07:48:17 AM
I said I'd post a special gif of myself once we surpass $3000, and this was quite some time ago


ROach,  how much did silver go up this weekend?  Wink Grin
R0ach doesn't like the kittycat as kittycat destroys his bullshit and useless metals. Kiss

Quote from: buwaytress on August 05, 2017, 08:31:11 AM
This week showed that whatever doesn't kill Bitcoin will only make it stronger. I definitely feel $5k is within reason, given everything that's already happened so bring on November! Special gif request please.
I wish Roger Ver and his baboons would do what they preach, abandon Bitcoin in favor of their created altcoin, Bcash. This would reduce the stalling. You want another special gif at $5k? Deal.

Quote from: BobLawblaw on August 05, 2017, 09:24:44 AM
Wake up. Check BTC price.

$3,195 ATH.
That is already boring. Give me $4k. Cheesy



279. Post 20706735 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote
SegWit Lock-in threshold expected at ≈Tue, 08 Aug 2017 19:14:34 GMT.
I am almost 100% confident that this will take us to a new ATH today.

In case someone doesn't know where to check that information: https://www.xbt.eu/.



280. Post 20708125 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: GHCoins45 on August 08, 2017, 07:32:35 AM
What's the current ATH? or where I can find this info?
You can, trivially, check on https://bitcoinity.org. BitStamp ATH $3490.

Quote from: pinger on August 08, 2017, 07:41:20 AM
https://twitter.com/CNBCFastMoney/status/894680240890548225
The software upgrade that he is referring to is Segwit, and it locks in today.

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on August 08, 2017, 08:10:18 AM
This is bananas isn't it? 3400?
No. I want $4k today.



281. Post 20712991 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: bitserve on August 08, 2017, 12:19:12 PM
If Litecoin Segwit activation process is of any reference to Bitcoin, we should expect a sharp rise when lock-in is certain (in a few hours) and a slower growth during the next days until activation. Then a mild dip and afterwards a slow grow upwards.... But that was Litecoin.
Read some of the previous posts before you respond. I don't know how widespread this website is: https://www.xbt.eu/, but it is pretty safe to say that lock-in is certain.

Quote
142 blocks before current lock-in period ends.
Still 42 blocks needed for a lock-in.
100% SegWit blocks mined in this lock-in period.
Just 29.6% SegWit blocks needed for a lock-in!
ETA 6 hours for a lock-in -> upwards of $3.5k today?



282. Post 20716440 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: bitserve on August 08, 2017, 12:34:40 PM
What site do you think I use to keep track of current status?
How should I know, people are weird.

Quote from: bitserve on August 08, 2017, 12:34:40 PM
I think you are using a different meaning for CERTAINTY.
Probable certainty then.

Quote from: bitserve on August 08, 2017, 12:34:40 PM
Lock-in will be certain when all the needed blocks for lock-in has been mined. That will happen when 41 additional BIP141 blocks have been mined.
No. Activation will be certain once the last lock-in block has been mined.

Quote from: suzanne5223 on August 08, 2017, 02:39:13 PM
Wait a minute. Are you serious SegWit was locks today?
Yes.

Quote from: suzanne5223 on August 08, 2017, 02:39:13 PM
Because what Theymos said is the SegWit will be lock on Aug 10 and it will be finally activated acouple of weeks i.e SegWit will be activated around 24th Aug, 2017.
It doesn't matter what theymos said, don't do appeals to authority. Nobody can give you an exact time, and August the 10th was an estimate. Due to rising hashrate, the period end (therefore also the time at which it locks in) has come closer. The same happened with the halving last year, which came earlier as blocks were mined on average faster than 10 minutes due to spikes in hashrate.




283. Post 20737894 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Okay, so who is dumping? Angry

Quote
6 blocks left before technical lock-in.
I want to see $3.5k.



284. Post 20749740 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):




Battle of the mini walls at BitStamp.



285. Post 20757756 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: Torque on August 10, 2017, 02:26:40 AM
"This time, the bitcoin mania, which has dwarfed even the Tulip Bulb lunacy, should become the posterchild graduate school case study for not only finance, but also psychology, sociology, and perhaps other disciplines. Ironically, for lacking discipline!

Friends don't let friends hold bitcoin below $2,900, the line in the sand of sell-stop protection. Otherwise, in the near future, one could be wishing they'd sold this $3,500 zone, as bitcoin breaks under $35, with growing potential for $3.50."[/i]
That idiot is more stupid and butthurt than professor Bitkorn. You really need to be delusional or have ulterior motives to write/predict something like that. I'll buy all your Bitcoin at $3.5 per piece.

Meanwhile, the price gif has been updated and future proofed:




286. Post 20792715 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):



Bullish? Cheesy Congrats on the new ATH.



287. Post 20793148 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: Torque on August 11, 2017, 12:58:37 PM
Ummm... shutting the front door for Average Joe whilst still servicing their rich friends out the back? You decide  Wink

https://gemini.com/auction-data/
They are probably sourcing the coin that gets auctioned off differently than those that are on the market. I don't mind either way. I hope that we see >$3600 today.

Quote from: bitserve on August 11, 2017, 01:09:35 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/11/hbo-hack-game-of-thrones-ransom.html

Why exortionists are still using Bitcoin for this stuff instead of using Monero is beyond me. Maybe they don't know better?
The same reason for which people generally FUD Bitcoin or r/btc FUDs SegWit. They are stupid and/or ignorant to know better.

Quote from: bitserve on August 11, 2017, 01:09:35 PM
On other news.... The price is reacting to Segwit exactly as predicted. There will be dips on the road... but I think I need to readjust my price target for end of year.
I wonder what the price will be at the time of activation. Maybe OP should change the poll to reflect on that?



288. Post 20794486 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: Torque on August 11, 2017, 01:17:19 PM
I think that it has more to do with the fact that they know their victims would know more about bitcoin, be able to easily set up an account and buy it with fiat money. With Monero directly, that's not as easily accessible... hardly anyone has heard of it. I'm 100% sure that you will never see Monero listed for buy/sell on regulated brokers like Coinbase.
Yeah, but most of the victims do not have Bitcoin and have just possibly heard a bit about it. I don't think that slapping "register to Kraken, buy Monero, etc." instructions on the ransomware would be too difficulty. Monero is harder to use than Bitcoin, but it shouldn't be that hard.

Quote from: becoin on August 11, 2017, 01:53:50 PM
Another day, another ATH. Yawn.
It is kind of boring until at least $4k. I don't like the mini wall on Bitstamp on $3600.



289. Post 20801895 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Here we go, another ATH. Hopefully we hit $3600 today.




290. Post 20809991 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: Lauda on August 11, 2017, 08:20:46 PM
Here we go, another ATH. Hopefully we hit $3600 today.


I underestimated this. Maybe $3800 - $4000 Monday target?



291. Post 20813705 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: Denker on August 12, 2017, 08:12:55 AM
$4k probably within the next 36 hours I would say.It is definitely possible.
With the beginning of the new week I expect some correction to happen.
Possible for sure, but I'm hoping it takes a mini break for a day or so.

Quote from: Denker on August 12, 2017, 08:12:55 AM
Hopefully not too low. 3400-3500 would be nice.
Yeah, I'd hate to see $2xxx range again. Do you guys remember the SEC ruling, when people who sold at the bottom were telling us we are going to $600? Cheesy That feels like it happened ages ago.

Someone placed a wall on Bitstamp, but it's being eaten already:



292. Post 20821921 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: jimmy_007vn on August 12, 2017, 04:58:58 PM
did bitcoin get segwit yet?
Quote
SegWit activation this period? YES!
Activation expected at ≈Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:37:48 GMT.

Still 1593 blocks needed for SegWit to activate.
Activation period is at 21%.
Soon: https://www.xbt.eu/

Amazing new ATH, so close to $4k. Some dumping has commenced and made the price tank by $100 within seconds.



293. Post 20822247 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: Meuh6879 on August 12, 2017, 05:08:04 PM
Some dumping has commenced and made the price tank by $100 within seconds.
Yep, median line touched ...
I hope that we don't lose all of the daily growth.

Quote from: juju on August 12, 2017, 05:10:51 PM
What is the new floor going to be? I was thinking somewhere down at 900 USD, that seems too hopeful, its looking like it might be even higher now above 1300.
I'm wondering whether you're trolling, you've sold somewhere very low or you're just outright stupid. Roll Eyes The new floor is somewhere between 2k-3k if not higher.




294. Post 20824618 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: bitserve on August 12, 2017, 05:24:10 PM
Nice and lovely dip it seems.
Looks like a forced and failed dump aiming for a correction (hence failed)

Quote from: vortex1878 on August 12, 2017, 05:25:31 PM
Lauda being spot on. Cheers, buddy.
Thanks. People who think that we may see sub $1000 or even sub $2000 (possibly, too early to tell) again are delusional at best. Just take a look recently what happened:
1) Major exchange is gone (BTC-e).
2) Biggest Bitcoin mixer is gone (bitmixer).
3) Several darkmarkets are gone.

What has Bitcoin been doing since these events occurred? Kept skyrocketing. The honey badger does not give a fuck and keeps storing wealth.




295. Post 20827120 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: yefi on August 12, 2017, 09:50:40 PM
Thanks. People who think that we may see sub $1000 or even sub $2000 (possibly, too early to tell) again are delusional at best. Just take a look recently what happened:
1) Major exchange is gone (BTC-e).
2) Biggest Bitcoin mixer is gone (bitmixer).
3) Several darkmarkets are gone.

What has Bitcoin been doing since these events occurred? Kept skyrocketing. The honey badger does not give a fuck and keeps storing wealth.
Contradicting all those pundits who claimed BTC's value was dependent on crime.  Cool
Ironically, I've read such claims (comment section) on some very recent articles in a few mainstream media. This is further proof for my belief that in a time where we are presented with a wast source of information (interweb), that average Joe keeps distancing himself from facts and that the average IQ/knowledge keeps declining. For example, one comment claimed that most of BTC's transactions are dark-web related which is absurd as: 1) You can't know which transaction is which / only estimate. 2) Transaction volume has not taken a significant hit after the markets were killed. 3) BTC is excellent for online transactions, and I'm sure plenty of people use it (I don't even have to mention Gambling).

I hope this price point holds: 37xx.



296. Post 20827406 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: Xavofat on August 12, 2017, 10:07:26 PM
You say that as if it's a good thing. 
It is. It shows that Bitcoin has become so robust that these events have minor effects.

Quote from: Xavofat on August 12, 2017, 10:07:26 PM
It would be healthy for the market to react to good and bad events depending on which happen at which time and how relevant they are to BTC users, but it's not doing that.  It's just flying upwards regardless of anything that is actually happening.
Wrong. It was quite heavily swinging up and down, and even reached a bottom of $18xx.

Quote from: Xavofat on August 12, 2017, 10:07:26 PM
There are some positive events (such as SegWit),
"Some" and SegWit can't be placed in the same sentence. You have no idea what you're talking about.

Quote from: Xavofat on August 12, 2017, 10:07:26 PM
They're watching the price rise and then desperately trying to justify it with positive events even though it went up by >$1000 in a week.
Absolute numbers are useless, use percentages.



297. Post 20832959 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: Lauda on August 12, 2017, 06:24:46 AM
I underestimated this. Maybe $3800 - $4000 Monday target?
Okay it looks like I underestimated this again. Any ideas as to where the "top" may be?

Quote from: criptix on August 13, 2017, 04:34:46 AM
4 k and we still have 4 more months this year.
Falling $ and us stocks.
Rising gold and bitcoin.

Gentlemad it is.
Well, hopefully it doesn't correct too strongly this time around. Remember, we are up >80% in 30 days.



298. Post 20833818 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Looks like it the top isn't 4150. Another ATH reached. $5k soon? Cheesy

Quote from: yugyug on August 13, 2017, 06:16:43 AM
another all time ath hit this weekend waitng to peak at 4200 USD and then market correction follow between 3800 to 4000 USD. cheers once again.
What makes you think that it would peak at $4200? I don't see an indicators for that specific price point.

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 32138602 USD. Total asks: 2166 BTC. Ratio: 14831.70465 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0187 seconds
Cheesy



299. Post 20835664 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: matt4054 on August 13, 2017, 07:16:26 AM
If the post-correction price stays above $4k, let's all celebrate this by buying tulip bulbs for next spring... with fiat of course Grin
That's one way of showing the "Bitcoin = tulip bubble" guy. Cheesy

Quote from: AirFlame on August 13, 2017, 07:22:35 AM
Well remember that its a trend price. For me btc Real price is around 1200-1600 not more or less. So soon we will see a dump so big that gox dump was pice of cake.
There are three possible reasons for which the price "for you" is that low:
1) You are stupid/trolling.
2) -ll- paid to write nonsense.
3) You have sold at the bottom and now you're spreading FUD like professor Bitkorn.
 Smiley

Quote from: Eric Cartman on August 13, 2017, 08:40:16 AM
If US-NK goes for the worst probably there will be no Internet for some long time, why would people buy BTC to prepare for such situation?
The internet will remain functional.

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on August 13, 2017, 08:44:48 AM
...
Bcc= decentralised bitcoin
btc= segwit 3rd party centralised coin
This is wrong and must change...only we can change fix this.
Paid idiot. BCH = altcoin, regardless of price, hashrate, adoption, whatever. Anyone who thinks that Segwit is bad, aside from being paid by Ver and Jihan to *think* that, is highly ignorant if not outright mildly mentally retarded.



300. Post 20843354 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):



Quote
Activation expected at ≈Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:39:41 GMT.
Still 1446 blocks needed for SegWit to activate.
The price could avoid a correction leading up to Segwit. If it does not correct by then, then it shall post activation (but we may see even a higher price at that time).



301. Post 20860265 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: fabiorem on August 14, 2017, 05:27:59 AM
So, $3700 by wednesday, right? This is the dip everyone is predicting.
That's the dip that people who sold are hoping for. Wink

Quote from: yefi on August 14, 2017, 05:27:39 AM
One thing is that the past 21 months have been so fucking amazing - really from $250 to $4190 - and even the 80% increase in the past couple of weeks.
Amen to that. A life-changing 21 months.
Now think about what the coming 21 months will hold for us.

Quote from: BobLawblaw on August 14, 2017, 04:18:15 AM
Sheeit. Smell a correction comin'
Not yet.



302. Post 20862749 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

I called it just a few hours ago.

Quote from: Lauda on August 14, 2017, 08:29:45 AM
Sheeit. Smell a correction comin'
Not yet.
If by "correction comin'" BobLawblaw meant a new ATH is coming, then he may have been right. Smiley



303. Post 20873584 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Where is the correction that some have been smelling earlier today? Roll Eyes Time to eat this mini wall on Bitstamp and move on. Next stop $4500!



304. Post 20876670 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on August 14, 2017, 05:15:38 PM
Where is the correction that some have been smelling earlier today? Roll Eyes Time to eat this mini wall on Bitstamp and move on. Next stop $4500!
Allergies. Sorry about that.
Or you've sold at the bottom, which is it? Cheesy

Quote from: DARKHOLDER on August 14, 2017, 05:18:56 PM
Agree for that.. Wink
Excellent.

Quote from: bones261 on August 14, 2017, 05:21:29 PM
Before it does that, can it please come back down to fill my small bid at 4255 first on GDAX? Then it may resume to $4500.00.
This should have happened. I hope that it remains a bit flat around 42xx for some time.

Quote from: RayX12 on August 14, 2017, 07:18:47 PM
Threats of centralization...

Honey Badger don't give a shit...
That threat has forked off, at least for the time being. If miners were to back away from that FrankenSegwit nonsense, we would be steadily flowing towards a bottom between $5 and $10k in Q4.



305. Post 20877349 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: jojo69 on August 14, 2017, 07:43:20 PM
SELLL!  SELLL! SELLL!
Sell if you want to get burned. Smiley

Quote from: BobLawblaw on August 14, 2017, 07:54:08 PM
I'm not selling anything before the next halvening.
Next halving? Let's talk about the one after that.

Quote from: BobLawblaw on August 14, 2017, 07:54:08 PM
Honey Badger don't give a shit...
Honey Badger has just begun its trajectory. Wait for more TPS and the first ETF. $4200 will look the same way that $100 looks to us now.



306. Post 20889310 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

That was an awesome ride to watch in hindsight. I wonder whether we will break $4500 today. It seems that this bull run is stronger than anything we've seen in quite some time.

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 31189700 USD. Total asks: 3005 BTC. Ratio: 10376.34891 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0163 seconds

Quote from: becoin on August 15, 2017, 07:57:56 AM
It's very frustrating! Why isn't there new ATH today? Is Bitcoin dead?
Relax mister bee. Slow and steady is best.



307. Post 20890834 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Correction imminent or just a big dump from someone?



308. Post 20899443 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: DeathAngel on August 15, 2017, 10:02:11 AM
Correction imminent or just a big dump from someone?
Damn, I hope not too much of a correction. Definitely been a dump though, down to $4100 on Stamp. I hope $4000 holds.
Well, it didn't hold. Seems to have bottomed out at exactly 3800 which is quite odd, but I'll take it. Hopefully it stays above $4xxx this time around.

Quote from: soullyG on August 15, 2017, 10:09:07 AM

That picture is awesome and a perfect depiction of what was going on at the time.



309. Post 20905107 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: soullyG on August 15, 2017, 05:30:01 PM
It makes sense, the drop on the 13th already tested that region for support. Fingers crossed it stays firm..
Seems to hold, for now at least. This is becoming quite the roller coaster. We haven't see this kind of .

Quote from: soullyG on August 15, 2017, 05:30:01 PM
I thought it rather apt also, unfortunately I found it on Google so can't take credit for the amazing drawing skills Smiley
You should try drawing one yourself. I know that you can do it!

Quote from: BTCtrader71 on August 15, 2017, 08:37:39 PM
ETF's result? ...
Wait for the first, real, ETF to be approved and then we can talk. $4xxx will be a thing of the past.



310. Post 20917824 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: bitserve on August 15, 2017, 11:23:51 PM
This is very bullbish:

 https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2017/08/15/a-bitcoin-is-worth-4000-why-you-probably-should-not-own-one/#62308c403b08
Which is complete bullshit. I wonder how those writers got their jobs?

Quote from: AlexGR on August 16, 2017, 01:31:04 AM
You'll note that these guys always talk about tulips. At the same time they always ignore what might be considered irrational market behavior for ultra-rich hobbies like art collection of multi-million dollar pieces, at insane values...
...
You add a few of those and you are in the tens of billions range. But no, that's not tulips, that's art "deserving" billions. Right.
Comparing Bitcoin to tulips is retarded at best and completely flawed in every way. How can one not understand the value that Bitcoin sets? We are talking about a whole new payment system/platform and a store of value that is by far superior to any existing financial system and store of wealth (gold sucks FYI). They have a chance now, especially the young, to risk and potentially be rewarded later. However, they choose to let their ignorance and stupidity take over which is why they haven't bought Bitcoin at $1-$10-$100-$1000, et. al. I'll wave down on them once we reach Moon and we built a Bitcoin city on the actual fucking Moon. Cheesy

Quote from: soullyG on August 16, 2017, 08:29:36 AM
I need to get a life. I have been watching these walls too long I guess.



Total time logged in: 830 days, 6 hours and 14 minutes. Peasants. Cheesy



311. Post 20917932 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: sgk on August 16, 2017, 08:37:41 AM
That doesn't look real. I demand a screenshot. And no photoshop, please  Grin
You can see that for everyone by going to their profile and clicking the General Statistics, here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101872;sa=statPanel.

Here's some, on-topic data:
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 30605252 USD. Total asks: 3704 BTC. Ratio: 8261.88203 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0214 seconds
Bitstamp | There are currently 2100.3167 bitcoins offered at or under 4500.0 USD, worth 9031816.3663 USD in total. | Data vintage: 11.7827 seconds



312. Post 20931010 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Either someone knows something or this is just the usual movement. Correction over with a low of $3800? If we break $4.4k this time, expect $5-$7k to be the next top (if not more). My $4k (evil this time) gif (late):



Quote
Bitstamp | There are currently 1337.2975 bitcoins offered at or under 4500.0 USD, worth 5883234.75649 USD in total. | Data vintage: 12.2518 seconds
Leet number of Bitcoins till $4500. What does that tell us?



313. Post 20952333 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: Olivious on August 17, 2017, 08:25:43 AM
Oh were back at $4300, does it have something to do with this news https://cointelegraph.com/news/ibm-signs-deal-with-singaporean-port-operator-and-regional-shipping-firm-to-pilot-blockchain-based-supply-chain-network
It has absolutely nothing to do with that. They are using "the blockchain" not Bitcoin.

Quote from: snowdropfore on August 17, 2017, 09:00:49 AM
https://medium.com/@Zero404Cool/trezor-security-glitches-reveal-your-private-keys-761eeab03ff8
trezor wallet is hacked ,hope everyone's bitcoin not be stolen
How to spread FUD 101. For this to work, the following is necessary "The key to performing this hack is simply connecting two pins inside the Trezor device at the right time, even paperclip is suitable for this.". They also claim that there is an advanced version of it where this action is not necessary, but fail to disclose it. Additionally, this was bound to happen. The next version of Trezor and similar hardware will/should be resistant to this.
Quote
<gmaxwell> the hack is boring
<gmaxwell> you should assume anyone with physical access to any of these hardware wallets can steal their coins.
Nicely put. Side note: Link seems shady. I wouldn't touch the stuff that it provides.

ATH imminent?



314. Post 20952569 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: Lauda on August 17, 2017, 09:19:09 AM
ATH imminent?
I called it. Grin

Quote from: orpington on August 17, 2017, 09:26:45 AM
bitstamp ath yes!
Time for $4500. Prepare your rocket gifs.



315. Post 20952776 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: steelboy on August 17, 2017, 09:33:31 AM
How bi was the wall?
Less than half a million USD. I can't remember the exact number.

Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | Total bids: 34236825 USD. Total asks: 2280 BTC. Ratio: 15009.77960 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0177 seconds
I've never seen so many bids on Bitstamp before.



316. Post 20963907 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: Paashaas on August 17, 2017, 05:05:15 PM
...in further non-news today, Bitpay lied again https://blog.bitpay.com/bitcore-segwit-activation/
Full retard mode from Bitpay/Bitmain.

How to get sued 101. Roll Eyes I can't believe how shady they have become, we need to stop advertising either company to anyone.

Quote from: JimboToronto on August 17, 2017, 04:51:34 PM
Another day, another ATH, another correction... currently $4338USD/$5488CAD (Bitcoinaverage).
Are you sure that it isn't a forced dump? Then again, it could be a reaction to the Bitpay fraudulent post about *upgrading*.



317. Post 20991985 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Bitcoin Community Rallies Against BitPay: https://twitter.com/i/moments/898288070591520768. Fight back; the revolution will not be centralized nor corporation controlled.

Expect some stronger swings due to the shady practices of BitPay et. al. and don't forget to ditch them while you're at it. I dislike the current dump. Angry



318. Post 20995260 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: bitserve on August 18, 2017, 08:18:54 PM
You pay a 100% capital gains on whatever you get from it.
Move to the Cayman islands and you pay 0% capital gains on it. I don't see why anyone would want to cash out anywhere else, or cash out at all for that matter. Just spend the coins.

Next time I take a look at bitcoinity, it better be back up to 43xx.



319. Post 20995529 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: bitserve on August 18, 2017, 08:25:17 PM
Do you realise that "spending" the coins is a taxable event?
No. If you don't convert, you don't need to pay anything at least not in Europe.

Quote from: bitserve on August 18, 2017, 08:25:17 PM
Or are you just counting on they never figuring it out you did?
Good luck with that one.

Quote from: bitserve on August 18, 2017, 08:31:49 PM
but, again, usually you do know what USD/EUR value you sold for. Now, declare accordingly, you shaddy criminal!
Are you telling me that every time I pay food delivery via BTC I have to visit the tax man? Cheesy



320. Post 21004912 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: DaRude on August 19, 2017, 06:13:30 AM
Looks like wave 2 is incoming, BCChina is going full retard while BTC staying above $4k. This weekend should be interesting, gotta grab some popcorn
It's clearly an orchestrated pump if you take a look when it started and how it is moving. You've got to be out of your right mind to actually want BCH. I don't like the price of Bitcoin at the moment.

Quote from: AlexGR on August 19, 2017, 06:38:10 AM
Segwit2x is not BCH. It's not "free coins" in a parallel chain. Things are gonna get ugly if they decide to proceed.
Correct. It is going to become a big mess since Garzik, who is a very mallicious individual nowadays refused to add replay protection (you've read that right, btc1 has no replay protection).

Quote from: AlexGR on August 19, 2017, 06:38:10 AM
After all if you can control the "good news" and "bad news" of a market, then you can benefit financially.
Indeed.



321. Post 21007915 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: AlexGR on August 19, 2017, 07:11:37 AM
I would call it "orchestrated accumulation of coins". The accumulator is even leaving the market to dip so he can get the order books to his liking before proceeding to buy. I don't know who he is / who they are, but they do have pretty deep pockets Tongue
Isn't it obvious that it is Roger Ver and his buddies manipulating the market? South Korea anyone? Cheesy

Quote from: bitserve on August 19, 2017, 07:11:53 AM
FULL on-chain "scaling" is absolutely ridiculous. What's next? enable micropayments also on-chain? TX's of less than 1cent being replicated over thousands of full nodes and stored for centuries? Ridiculous.
Which shows just how stupid the people in support of that actually are.

Quote from: JimboToronto on August 19, 2017, 08:17:09 AM
I'll hold both and wait.
You will be left holding bags. Dump in time. Wink



322. Post 21012881 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Meanwhile, take a look at the total amount of bids on Bitstamp:
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 39490400 USD. Total asks: 3824 BTC. Ratio: 10324.70656 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0150 seconds
This is by far higher than we've ever seen. If this isn't clear and shady market manipulation, then I don't know what is. It may be time to drop some lawsuits.



323. Post 21013052 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: aesma on August 19, 2017, 01:09:04 PM
Are you sure it's how it works ? I'm never going to use Coinbase, ever, that's for sure.
Coins that you hold on an exchange are not yours, they are IOUs. The exchange is not obliged to play these fork games with Ver and Jihan.

Quote from: aesma on August 19, 2017, 01:10:44 PM
I was wondering, maybe one of you knows, how come the prices on various exchanges are so close most of the time ? Are there whales arbing like crazy ?
They obviously are. Whenever an exchange is far ahead or far behind with the price, it's often a sign of a lack of arbitrage (i.e. something is making arbitrage hard).



324. Post 21060695 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Okay, who attempted to dump this time? Angry

Quote from: HanvanBitcoin on August 21, 2017, 06:42:37 AM
BTCought the dip Grin
Nicely done.

Quote from: JimboToronto on August 21, 2017, 07:29:04 AM
Caught the bottom with 2.4% ATM buy fee. Lucky timing.
That's a nice fee for an ATM. On average I found 5% or higher.



325. Post 21069590 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on August 21, 2017, 07:55:04 AM
They have dynamic fee pricing. People buy, they raise buy fees and lower sell fees, and vice versa.
That's pretty awesome. Most have a fixed fee that is much higher than what you bought at.

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on August 21, 2017, 12:04:21 PM
Are we bullish short term?
We were, but someone attempted to force a dump, again.

Quote
SegWit activation this period? YES!
Activation expected at ≈Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:00:32 GMT.
Soon.



326. Post 21109944 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on August 22, 2017, 06:15:06 PM
The masses aren't even aware of Bitcoin, let alone the scaling debate.
There is no scaling debate, there is only an centralization attack on Bitcoin.

So, who sold at the bottom? Cheesy Some lovely buy walls are occasionally appearing on Bitstamp.



327. Post 21323852 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | Total bids: 43930954 USD. Total asks: 1851 BTC. Ratio: 23731.01758 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0164 seconds
Any newbies willing to sell at the currently, very undervalued, prices? Cheesy



328. Post 21404329 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Every other day a new ATH. I think we are all getting used to these smaller movements:




329. Post 21421181 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on September 01, 2017, 09:12:13 AM
Yeah it's all good for most of us but it probably takes something a bit more volatile to excite now. Maybe powering past $5000 will bring the train & rocket gifs out again Cheesy
I don't want volatility. We've had plenty of that not long ago. The first *exciting* movement will be hitting $5k for the first time on Bitstamp. Then I'll probably be bored until $7.5k.

Quote from: cmacwiz on September 01, 2017, 07:24:18 PM
Do I have to pay capital gains if I buy shit with my BTC? Like gold, or magic cards, or factory sealed og pepsi clear?
It depends where you are located at, however the likely answer is no. You're just using a currency that went up in value. You don't pay capital tax on shitty fiat when you use it either. Tongue



330. Post 21421710 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote from: Ibian on September 01, 2017, 07:58:10 PM
Likely answer is yes. It's not about consistency or logic, just about how much money the taxman can get out of us.
Good luck declaring capital gains every time you spend $20 BTC on food. Roll Eyes

Quote from: Eric Cartman on September 01, 2017, 08:11:20 PM
$5000 today?
$5000 in 1 hour?  Cheesy

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 44655552 USD. Total asks: 2047 BTC. Ratio: 21805.59522 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 204.1099 seconds



331. Post 21435780 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote from: becoin on September 02, 2017, 10:07:40 AM
Whoever dumped, many thanks for the cheap coins. Keep the good work!
Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | Total bids: 46034286 USD. Total asks: 1994 BTC. Ratio: 23074.89489 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0156 seconds
The buy side is hitting record highs every other day. I can't possibly figure out why someone would want to sell significant sums at this point, unless they're trying to game the market. There will be a lot of hurt people who sold this year.



332. Post 21436598 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote from: fluidjax on September 02, 2017, 10:17:55 AM
I think some people have preset exit points, such as when it reaches just under $5k, I'll sell x% which will allow me to say buy a car, or pay off my mortgage.
Buy a car? Such an useless waste of money.

Quote from: fluidjax on September 02, 2017, 10:17:55 AM
Everyone knows that it will probably go up, but when you hit a life changing price target, you'd be mad to continue taking 100% risk.
That is absolute horse shit. If you understand something better than the 99% of the population, then you should be going 110% in (of course, only if it makes sense to invest). The best time to buy Bitcoin was 7 years ago, the second best time is today. Quote me on this in 3 years and you will see whether going in 50% or 100% was the smarter choice.




333. Post 21438213 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote from: fluidjax on September 02, 2017, 11:07:51 AM
If you believe that it is 100% certain that Bitcoin will go up, then do it!
I did.

Quote from: fluidjax on September 02, 2017, 11:07:51 AM
And spend the next X years, not enjoying the fruits of your capital.
Enjoying the fruits is for weak individuals who need *pleasure*.

Quote from: fluidjax on September 02, 2017, 11:07:51 AM
Of course you might die before you cash out, and then you got no benefit from it at all.
I do not care.

Quote from: fluidjax on September 02, 2017, 11:07:51 AM
But perhaps your youth means you don't believe in your own death yet.
Death or life is also irrelevant. The only thing that matters is Bitcoin. Cool

Quote from: Meuh6879 on September 02, 2017, 11:11:47 AM
There will be a lot of hurt people who sold this year.
Well :
1) it's good for the supply, the flux ...
2) it's good for the network because we don't want this kind of holder ...
Speculators are annoying, aren't they?



334. Post 21459502 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 52466156 USD. Total asks: 2928 BTC. Ratio: 17916.45265 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0251 seconds
Just thought that this might be interesting to people. This is by far the highest amount of USD that I've seen on Bitstamp. Unless something of negative nature happens, it looks like we are going through the $5k in no time.



335. Post 21492522 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on September 04, 2017, 07:21:38 AM
You should never go all in with anything. But if you do not already have a fraction of your portfolio loaded with PM you might better think again right now.
Which is bullshit advice from people who will never make it big. If you understand something better than 99.9% of the population, and it reasonably seems like an absurdly excellent investment then you go full in. If you had done this with BTC, you wouldn't be here sharing bullshit advice. Disclaimer: I am not responsible for people who can't asses what "reasonable" actually is and lose all their money investing in stocks or metals.  Cheesy

Quote from: podyx on September 04, 2017, 08:00:52 AM
Shouldn't go much lower than $4300
Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | Total bids: 49190800 USD. Total asks: 2449 BTC. Ratio: 20084.79891 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0663 seconds
Forced dump.



336. Post 21509205 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Talk about being oversold:
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 51090228 USD. Total asks: 2382 BTC. Ratio: 21440.11227 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0296 seconds

The Chinese must be confused regarding the difference between BTC, mETH and ICOs.



337. Post 21559457 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 54677514 USD. Total asks: 2655 BTC. Ratio: 20591.36425 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0167 seconds
But yeah, sell because of the ICO ban kool-aid drinkers. Roll Eyes

Quote from: Elwar on September 06, 2017, 07:28:08 AM
I will likely move to Tahiti next year and will likely live on a boat.
Do you have room for a cat?



338. Post 21564433 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on September 06, 2017, 10:36:24 AM
from same fishwrap https://seekingalpha.com/article/4104085-bitcoin-will-made-illegal-tender
Quote
Expect Bitcoin to approach its cost of production of US$500 when the market prices this in.
Man some people are truly delusional or just butthurt losers. You have to be either: 1) Extremely ignorant. 2) Paid to support the govt and banks. 3) Out of your god damn mind, to support them when a much better alternative is at hand.



339. Post 21616482 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 56299221 USD. Total asks: 2853 BTC. Ratio: 19732.79138 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0167 seconds
Today marks the first day (at least based on my own observations) that we've had $56 million in bids on Bitstamp. I've been querying this several times through the days, and the asks were mostly the ones fluctuating.

Quote from: cmacwiz on September 07, 2017, 08:26:41 PM
I see kwukduk has started a BCH related FUD thread, looks like we shall be moving up in the coming weeks!
Standard, highly centralized, shitcoin. Nothing to see there. Smiley



340. Post 21626103 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: CoinCube on September 08, 2017, 04:12:29 AM
A Tokyo-listed company is spending over $300 million to get into bitcoin mining
https://qz.com/1071926/japans-gmo-internet-group-plans-a-300-million-investment-in-bitcoin-mining/
It is seriously time to get rid of Jihan & co.

Quote from: Gab0 on September 08, 2017, 04:16:21 AM
46 companies in the bitcoin ecosystem, including some of the most relevant, have indicated their support for segwit2x:
Which represents, according to other metrics, less than 5% of the userbase consensus. Keep drinking the kool-aid and centralize your own altcoin if you want. I'll stay with the real Bitcoin. You know, the one that isn't controlled by corporations? Kiss

Quote
Bitcoin, coming up next 🚀 SegWit effect 🚀 Lightning in action 🚀 Free S2X tokens 🚀 Schnorr 🚀 MAST 🚀 ETF approval🚀 More users 🚀 ...
It should probably not say Schnorr but rather signature aggregation, but I'll go with it. Cheesy Post: https://twitter.com/benvh/status/905805434552012802.

Meanwhile, honeybadger does not care about their upcoming attack on the Bitcoin network. Up we go.



341. Post 21626810 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: jojo69 on September 08, 2017, 07:03:14 AM
Sorry jbreher, nothing against you personally, but a lot of bigblockers motives are pretty clear, and I find them unsavory.
He's a paid baboon from Ver & co. Don't get bamboozled by those trying to pretend like they're acting in *your* best interest. They got their big block fork that almost nobody wants to use (they barely achieve sub 5% utilization when blocks are frequent).

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on September 08, 2017, 07:22:34 AM
WTF I can't post here and have my shitty advertising signature post as well... wtf is Bitcointalk becoming?!?!?!?!?!?!
You're slow.

Can we get back to the price talk and get away from the BCH/x2 altcoin shilling? Thanks OP.



342. Post 21629363 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Putting all those paid shills for BCH/x2 altcoin aside, back to relevant things:

Quote from: Lauda on September 07, 2017, 09:19:55 PM
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 56299221 USD. Total asks: 2853 BTC. Ratio: 19732.79138 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0167 seconds
Today marks the first day (at least based on my own observations) that we've had $56 million in bids on Bitstamp. I've been querying this several times through the days, and the asks were mostly the ones fluctuating.
Today we've beaten the previous high:
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 57956573 USD. Total asks: 2415 BTC. Ratio: 23989.41228 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0161 seconds



343. Post 21638032 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: Elwar on September 08, 2017, 02:12:41 PM
Did China ban crypto again?
Of course they did.

http://finance.jrj.com.cn/tech/2017/09/08211823086220.shtml
Quote
Google translate: "A bigger regulatory storm approaching: close to regulators on the 8th told reporters that the bit currency trading platform has become illegal economic activities, money laundering and bankers manipulate the price of loser retail channel, should be banned as soon as possible."
Someone seems to be in strong need of cheap korn.
Ahh...China ban #34. They banned ICOs last week which stopped all ICOs.
Not this bullshit again. I thought we were past the Bitcoin banning phase in China. Roll Eyes

Now is a perfect time to see who's a true hodler and who isn't. Bring it on.



344. Post 21648611 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | Total bids: 54280002 USD. Total asks: 3327 BTC. Ratio: 16312.10759 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 99.0342 seconds
Don't be bamboozled by fake news and play into their hands. It is very likely that we will recover very quickly as it is oversold.

Quote from: becoin on September 08, 2017, 08:58:27 PM
Just as someone would have to be a retard to buy right now, the risk by far outweighs the profit potential
So, people buying bitcoins on every dip during last 8 years are retards... Are you retarded?
You need not ask questions to which the obvious answer is yes.



345. Post 21661239 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: Lauda on September 08, 2017, 09:03:53 AM
Today we've beaten the previous high:
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 57956573 USD. Total asks: 2415 BTC. Ratio: 23989.41228 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0161 seconds
And it continues:

Quote
<gribble> Bitstamp | Total bids: 58856048 USD. Total asks: 2767 BTC. Ratio: 21264.24643 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0181 seconds
We'll recover much sooner than people anticipate.



346. Post 21727440 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Still holding steady at Bitstamp when it comes to bids:
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 59050149 USD. Total asks: 2904 BTC. Ratio: 20331.04298 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0321 seconds

Though I'm somewhat annoyed that we still have not recovered from fake news (seems to be an increasing problem in the world nowadays anyways).



347. Post 21731129 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: empowering on September 11, 2017, 02:47:15 PM
MAST incoming too  Grin  (potentially)
I don't think it is likely going to happen within this year, but I wouldn't mind being pleasently surprised. MAST as a soft fork is just a no-brainer.

Quote from: jojo69 on September 11, 2017, 04:10:25 PM
sigh  Reindexing blocks on disk     3 years and 48 weeks behind

this is why I don't tell friends to get into bitcoin
Read the release notes. That is supposed to happen. Some people. Roll Eyes



348. Post 21734778 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: jojo69 on September 11, 2017, 04:58:33 PM
I think not
Quote
The first time you run version 0.15.0, your chainstate database will be converted to a new format, which will take anywhere from a few minutes to half an hour, depending on the speed of your machine.

that was that UXTO or whatever, that went pretty quickly
Ops, misread that. Correct, a chainstate update not a reindex.

Quote from: jojo69 on September 11, 2017, 04:58:33 PM
I do not see this full reindex referenced in the notes
Something went wrong on your end. Did you download a RC? I don't see the link for the final build yet. Anyhow, this is not the right place for this.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 11, 2017, 06:42:09 PM
Pray tell.  What is MAST?
I think the best way of putting that in layman words (not that you need that) would be "smarter Bitcoin".



349. Post 21746873 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on September 12, 2017, 03:02:58 AM
Feels like lift off. Everybody hand me your pants. No time to explain...
Bump
Sounds about right:
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 60649077 USD. Total asks: 3011 BTC. Ratio: 20138.58681 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0182 seconds
It's time to move back to the rightful valuation of >$5k. Tongue



350. Post 21747521 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: RealMachasm on September 12, 2017, 06:34:12 AM
Feels like lift off. Everybody hand me your pants. No time to explain...
Not sure that you really want my pants, but I'm game if you are!
By the way, fees are down to 90 sats per byte.
https://bitcoinfees.21.co/
People are still largely overpaying due to bad fee estimation from their wallets. You could likely get a 10-20 sat/byte transaction confirmed very quickly right now (if not in the next block). Just make sure you're already using Segwit. Keep an eye out here as well: https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin.



351. Post 21754554 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: kurious on September 12, 2017, 07:56:50 AM
Grrrr.... Maybe wait for 15.x if you're on a 64Bit Mac?
Wait for the final version. If that does not work, then report the issue on Github. Complaining about it anywhere else is inherently useless.

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on September 12, 2017, 10:15:37 AM
PANTS RECEIVED

09/12 gembitz
09/12 cAPSLOCK
09/12 jojo69
09/12 RealMachasm
09/12 Lauda
09/12 d_eddie
09/12 xhomerx10

*Now accepting short pants, track pants and trousers.
I'll take a bite. Why color are my pants?



352. Post 21782436 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

I had not expected that down movement. This now forces me to change my plans. This does not look too bad:

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 55338478 USD. Total asks: 3855 BTC. Ratio: 14354.81375 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0259 seconds

Quote from: flounderella on September 13, 2017, 02:06:56 AM
LOL ... this puts Jamie Dimon into perspective:

Two numbers that stand out:
Over $13b in fines paid by JPM because of fraudulent mortgage practices
Over $1b in separate fines paid because of its role in the Madoff scheme.

All under Jamie's watch. But it's Bitcoin he's worried is the FRAUD
Truly ironic, when the CEO of the fraud bank JPM which got bailed out with billions claims Bitcoin is a fraud. Roll Eyes Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of Bitcoin knows that it can not be a fraud. Bitcoin is neutral.

Quote from: luckygenough56 on September 13, 2017, 06:34:59 AM
Again only fools and idiots would be selling now...... or i'm wrong ?  Huh
selling at the potential top of a bubble to take x5-x6 profit from 800 dollars doesn't seem so foolish
Selling at $4k, when the top was $5k is truly foolish.



353. Post 21782982 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: ShadowBCH on September 13, 2017, 07:02:25 AM
So tell me what is BTC?
If you don't understand what BTC is, then you're either a baboon or a dinosaur, or both. Roll Eyes

Quote from: ShadowBCH on September 13, 2017, 07:02:25 AM
I will answer you BTc is nothing.
Scratch that, you're just an idiot.

Keep drinking the current financial system's kool-aid. That's where the true fraud lies. Do you think it's just a coincidence that almost no school in the world teaches you about money or where its value comes from? Cheesy



354. Post 21796616 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Isn't it *nice* having this much vocal influence? You just open short positions, and say some nonsense FUD about Bitcoin and enjoy the profits. Unfortunately, Bitcoin as an entity itself can't fight back about those defamatory statements. Angry



355. Post 21823937 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

I smell potential blood in the streets again. Roll Eyes

Quote from: toknormal on September 14, 2017, 10:13:34 AM
Revaluation getting baked in.
Not bubble.
It was never a bubble to begin with, and those zooming out on non logarithmic charts and making conclusions are idiots at best.

Quote from: toknormal on September 14, 2017, 10:13:34 AM
Firm growth rings being put in place and solid anchors - unlike the 2013/14 rise which didn't get a chance to consolidate after the 1k ATH. (Well, it did but only by the time it had lost 90% of its growth).
I wouldn't mind sticking around this point, given that we don't continue much lower.



356. Post 21824468 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: 1982dre on September 14, 2017, 10:50:06 AM
Was the BTC850 Wall eating that fast @bitstamp ??  Huh
Half of it was sold into (around $650k), and the rest was pulled.



357. Post 21826431 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):



OP should update the poll into 'Where will the bottom be in September'?. Roll Eyes



358. Post 21862687 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.21h):

That $2m sale through the first $3k wall on Bitstamp was painful to watch. I don't see this stopping soon when there is a >10% price difference between the West and East (currently ~$2.6k).

Quote from: lightfoot on September 15, 2017, 11:45:48 AM
Haven't looked at Ethereum, but man Litecoin is getting creamed. Down over 50%.
Litecoin is almost vapor without China TBH.

Quote from: lightfoot on September 15, 2017, 11:45:48 AM
Ah well. Glad I cashed out enough to cover supplies and taxes. For the rest I'll just sit back and watch.
I had planned to buy some stuff back when we were around $4.8k, but I guess they can wait now. Angry



359. Post 21872451 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.21h):

I did not expect that sudden upswing.

Quote from: jojo69 on September 15, 2017, 04:59:33 PM
vol-a-til-i-ty

strong and warm and wild and free
Back to the old days.

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on September 15, 2017, 05:06:12 PM
If you cannot withstand the stress of being a millionaire one day and a piece of shit on the day after you better stay out of crypto.
That will not happen in the future. Volatility will continue to downtrend as it has been doing so far.




360. Post 21878779 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.21h):

Quote from: bones261 on September 15, 2017, 09:32:38 PM
You would think after almost three years of being involved in the cryptocurrency sphere, that I would know how to trade. But I still am quite clueless. I thought I did well yesterday. I managed to put of few trades together, where I sold higher and then would buy back lower. I didn't catch the absolute crests and troughs, but I did OK with the little bit that I was moving around. I then bought back last night, and left it at that, so I could sleep well at night with a few more satoshis than I had 24 hours ago. This morning, just before work, I saw the market shoot up from a low of almost 2800 USD to a little above $3300. I thought, surely this must be near the peak, so I sold a little bit of my BTC. Now it appears the rally has continued and I find myself stuck with a fiat balance on Gdax. I know that it is recommended not to seek trading advise in this space. However, I really am clueless what to do. Any recommendations? Here are my options.

1) Keep the fiat balance on GDAX, so that I can continue to play around with the market at my leisure, and have both a BTC balance and a fiat balance.
2) Transfer fiat to Paypal and pay off the credit card balance that I have for them. (Coinbase charges a big fee to do this though, and I could probably pay off my balance outright with fiat I already have in the bank anyway.)
3) Buy back your BTC, use this as perfect example that I suck at trading and transfer all my BTC back to cold storage so I can HODL.

Thanks in advance for the advice.  Wink
Cut your losses, buy back Bitcoin and stop trading. The whole idea of these forced crashes is to flush people like you out. The 1% make more money, a few random traders and the rest just lose out.

I wonder if this is going to shoot back above $4k or not.



361. Post 21886143 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.21h):

Quote from: Lauda on September 15, 2017, 09:47:23 PM
I wonder if this is going to shoot back above $4k or not.
Almost.

Quote from: bones261 on September 15, 2017, 10:50:24 PM
Thanks for the honesty. You could have tried to put in a plug for Gunbot, but you didn't
You're welcome. I don't really push it onto people who aren't looking for trading software, or at least try not to.

JP Morgan has been buying Bitcoin ever since Dimon declared it a fraud. Cheesy



Source tweet: https://twitter.com/IamNomad/status/908831764457672709



362. Post 22311047 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 61020189 USD. Total asks: 2774 BTC. Ratio: 21990.74713 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0165 seconds
Just thought I'd leave this here, a new ATH in total bids.

Quote from: ghandi on September 28, 2017, 08:52:49 AM
Back on track! Smiley
Next stop?



363. Post 22766315 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 64735282 USD. Total asks: 2559 BTC. Ratio: 25288.24340 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0542 seconds
A nice ATH in bids.



364. Post 22780839 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Quote from: Lauda on October 09, 2017, 02:55:58 PM
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 64735282 USD. Total asks: 2559 BTC. Ratio: 25288.24340 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0542 seconds
A nice ATH in bids.
Small update:
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 67455970 USD. Total asks: 2314 BTC. Ratio: 29146.33676 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0189 seconds

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 09, 2017, 09:06:32 PM
this shit amuses me, who the fuck is actually believing in bitcoin as a technology?
who seriously would adopt bitcoin as a currency with all that forks?
you all just want more of the precious fiat money  Roll Eyes

time to buy ETH/LTC/ZEC...
Look a newbie spreading FUD... panicking and pumping stupid-ass alts...  Who would have thunk?   Roll Eyes
Any of those can be forked an non finite number of times. The reason for which they are not being forked is: a) Because there is no contention (natural nor made up by various malicious agents such as NSA, Roger Ver, Bitmain, et. al.). b) Because they do not matter. Smiley




365. Post 22794080 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on October 09, 2017, 09:11:04 PM
You obviously don't spend much time in alt land.
I spend enough time, and the statement is valid. It is referring to other things than what you have in mind, which is why it is confusing for you.

Quote from: sidhujag on October 09, 2017, 09:07:46 PM
You cant do sidechains.. federated peg doesnt work. Spv proofs give miners too much power. You need quorum of oracles to sign off. It wont be done on btc as it requires bonded validators.. a pow+pos hybrid design. A trustless sidechain design isnt in the cards for blockstream
This statement is completely false on all levels -> you're an idiot. Stop posting bullshit.

Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2017, 06:06:00 AM
Forgive me I am a developer. Its in my nature to be cryptic.
Self-proclaimed, non-existing, nature of a random developer.  Roll Eyes

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 67088511 USD. Total asks: 2318 BTC. Ratio: 28936.06265 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0660 seconds



366. Post 22816551 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Quote from: bitserve on October 10, 2017, 02:29:37 PM
About the referendum it is indeed ilegal, as anyone that knows spanish law and constitution do inmediately realize. It was the Judges and not the government who sent the police to seize the ballot boxes.
Illegal or not, you shouldn't beat your own people for: a) Peacefully protesting. b) Voting.

Quote from: ragnar0k on October 10, 2017, 03:18:59 PM
Such laws are bull shit. Referendum for independence should be every Earthing right. And specially every Europeans right.  Europe dont exist without it. It is simple as that. Countries that dont care of their citizens rights have nothing to do in Europe.

Nobody living in EU would speak about Europe like that - do you live in Europe?
Doubt it. He's highly uneducated apparently or just a random signature spammer (even though there are no signatures in this thread).

Quote from: JimboToronto on October 10, 2017, 04:10:05 PM
A new ATH by the weekend would be good too though.  Cool
I'm waiting for a certain Jimbo from Toronto to pump it. Lips sealed



367. Post 22894715 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 65866512 USD. Total asks: 1634 BTC. Ratio: 40288.85837 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0165 seconds
Exchanges are running out of coins. Cheesy



368. Post 22905515 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Quote from: 1982dre on October 12, 2017, 12:20:22 PM
Nice buy wall @Stamp  Cheesy

8410358.99   1621.11776986   5188.00
Definitely crazy:



369. Post 22940001 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Damn, that spike was unexpected. $6k today or cooling off?

Lightning Desktop App for testing is now available: http://blog.lightning.engineering/announcement/2017/10/12/test-blitz.html.



370. Post 23134784 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Quote from: vroom on October 17, 2017, 11:50:06 AM
bch +30% and bitcoin is dipping. looks like shitcoin supporters are pushing it.
Ver is once again pushing it with lies and bullshit.

Quote from: Last of the V8s on October 17, 2017, 11:46:17 AM
meanwhile something of a leg down because Ver fudification https://archive.is/2Mw0E https://www.bitcoin.com/info/bitcoin-cash-is-bitcoin
Exactly. It goes beyond ridiculous where it claims that Bitcoin Cash is irreversible but Bitcoin isn't. That's the joke of the day.



371. Post 23328251 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: pfrtlpfmpf on October 21, 2017, 04:59:02 PM
I think, theres no TA applicable here, it`s all emotions, for the moment .
Is this movement a result of the emotions that you're talking about?



372. Post 23328439 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on October 21, 2017, 05:10:28 PM
I think, theres no TA applicable here, it`s all emotions, for the moment .
Is this movement a result of the emotions that you're talking about?
Is panic an emotion?
Depends. What does the doctor say?

Quote from: Icygreen on October 21, 2017, 05:12:37 PM
Stop order grab before resuming  Grin
Resuming to where? A top shall occur soon.



373. Post 23329265 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: vroom on October 21, 2017, 05:30:25 PM
what's going on, who of you cashed out? Smiley
Who in their right mind would keep all of their stash on an exchange? It would not be unwise to sell a very small amount in order to have some stinking fiat for champagne && other *consumables*1(whatever people are in to these days) until the fork drama is over.  Cheesy

[1] I can recommend Cat wine: https://www.meowingtons.com/products/cat-wine.



374. Post 23735041 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):



Ouch.

https://twitter.com/btcvix/status/924731726282280960



375. Post 23858127 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Every day is like:



Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 90903932 USD. Total asks: 2860 BTC. Ratio: 31780.46990 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0799 seconds



376. Post 23861379 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: d_eddie on November 01, 2017, 08:36:41 AM
I don't know how easy 400k will be, but 10k within the year looks doable.
10k within a year? Fork put aside, 10k will happen in Q1 2018 at the latest if they futures market goes live within 2017 which it should.

Quote from: JimboToronto on November 01, 2017, 09:03:37 AM
Ach, rally stalled. Not worth staying up for.
Not worth staying up for? What has become of us? Tongue



377. Post 23861786 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on November 01, 2017, 09:10:26 AM
Not worth staying up for? What has become of us? Tongue
OK you got me. Sleep deprivation be damned, I wanna see $6.5k.
I want to see $7k.  Angry

Quote from: d_eddie on November 01, 2017, 09:12:43 AM
I meant within the year 2017.
Oh, my bad. I've read that within 'a year'.



378. Post 23969373 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.25h):

This ratio.
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 106610570 USD. Total asks: 1930 BTC. Ratio: 55232.55661 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0227 seconds



379. Post 24044104 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.25h):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 118658286 USD. Total asks: 2360 BTC. Ratio: 50265.65999 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0184 seconds
Surprises me every other day.



380. Post 24417261 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

https://squawker.org/technology/death-of-segwit2x-has-signaled-a-mass-migration-into-bitcoin-cash/
http://blog.vermorel.com/journal/2017/11/11/bitcoin-cash-is-bitcoin-a-software-ceo-perspective.html

Propaganda with nothing but lies, fully sponsored by the con man Ver. What an annoying day with a massive coordinated attack of shilling and propaganda. Roll Eyes

Quote from: Peter R on November 11, 2017, 06:52:54 PM
Like I said yesterday, just hold BTC and BCH in equal proportions and you're protected whether Bitcoin Core or Bitcoin Cash wins.
There is no "winning". Bitcoin Cash is a centralized attack, while 2x was just a distraction. If that "wins", everyone loses.



381. Post 24453129 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: tonyq on November 12, 2017, 01:07:10 PM
I want to send someone $200 in bitcoin....what fee would ensure it happens inside 24 hours?
Quote
The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 950 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 226 bytes, this results in a fee of 214,700 satoshis.
https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/

Probably an overestimation. Just wait until the hashrate is back up as it should be.



382. Post 24473381 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Peter R on November 12, 2017, 08:17:21 PM
The difficulty on BCH has reset upwards, making BTC more profitable to mine.  We should see significant hash power migration shortly, a partial clearing of mempool, and a reduction in transaction fees on the Bitcoin Core chain.  

What I can't figure out is if people will dump more BTC because their coins can now move, or dump more BCH because the miners have left.  
Give me a break. Don't act innocent nor neutral because you are neither. Roger Ver is responsible for about >90% of the price movement on Bitcoin Scam aka Bitcoin Cash.

Quote from: Peter R on November 12, 2017, 08:24:48 PM
How about nodes? Does BCH actually have any that aren't Bitmain?
Yes. 
More clarifying: There is almost zero non-shill, non AWS, support of BCH.



383. Post 24473659 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.26h):

Quote from: Peter R on November 12, 2017, 08:27:57 PM
I can speculate that BCH might go down in the near term while simultaneously being a big block supporter.
You can simultaneously pretend to be an expert while being a con artist. Yes, we are well aware of that. Smiley

Quote from: Torque on November 12, 2017, 08:28:38 PM
Don't bother ragnar0k. JBreher will just hand-wave those ramblings of their CEO madman away as unimportant and ignore you.
They need an updated whitepaper,  "A CEO-to-Peer Electronic Cash System".



384. Post 24497837 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

The amount of bids at Bitstamp is still very high, less than 20 mil lower than ATH (IIRC):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 103103343 USD. Total asks: 4826 BTC. Ratio: 21359.80747 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0981 seconds

"Flippening" does not exist as something that is not Bitcoin can never be made Bitcoin regardless of how much malicious actors like Peter R would like you to believe that (yet he acts neutral).




385. Post 24500326 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: WhatsBitcoin on November 13, 2017, 09:17:39 AM
Is he a developer? He was in here shilling for BCH at 0.45!
He's a BU developer / promoter, and a centralization shill that wants to push 1 GB blocks onto the network. I guess NSA and Google will be the ones running nodes in Peter R's version of Bitcoin. Roll Eyes

Quote from: Heater on November 13, 2017, 09:32:34 AM
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 103103343 USD. Total asks: 4826 BTC. Ratio: 21359.80747 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0981 seconds
Lauda  - where do you get this data from? Is the historical data available somewhere?
There's a bot on IRC. You should join #bitcoin-pricetalk. It has various commands for querying various exchanges. There is no historical data available, but I occasionally post it in here.



386. Post 24549146 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

The paid and bamboozled shills Peter R and jbreher are out in full force, breaking the forum rules as they go (of course). You should wonder which agency is most likely to be funding agents to cause disruption in open source projects (NSA anyone?).

Back to what matters:

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 105256978 USD. Total asks: 3992 BTC. Ratio: 26365.44631 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0739 seconds



387. Post 24630225 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

We are back:

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 108622791 USD. Total asks: 2212 BTC. Ratio: 49100.87570 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0306 seconds



388. Post 24648385 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):



Nearing ATH levels:
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 112280264 USD. Total asks: 2670 BTC. Ratio: 42049.54378 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0206 seconds



389. Post 24705994 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):



On Bitcoinity in case that someone missed it.  Cheesy



390. Post 24806349 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Two things:
1) Nearing ATH in bids (if not ATH in bids already):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 119568445 USD. Total asks: 3097 BTC. Ratio: 38607.77569 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0400 seconds

2) Don't flaunt your wealth on social media:
http://altdigitalcurrency.com/?p=130.



391. Post 24903003 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 118809905 USD. Total asks: 1666 BTC. Ratio: 71313.95959 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0544 seconds

Everyone is a hodler.



392. Post 25024502 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):



Quote
GDAX | Total bids: 81025309 USD. Total asks: 4620 BTC. Ratio: 17535.41799 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0509 seconds

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 107988454 USD. Total asks: 2374 BTC. Ratio: 45474.82727 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.2332 seconds



393. Post 25190648 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 107732412 USD. Total asks: 1609 BTC. Ratio: 66936.37071 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0703 seconds

I could live with 66k per BTC.



394. Post 25275169 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Recommended watch: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7fksah/after_years_of_people_hoping_for_this_to_happen/.

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 107819705 USD. Total asks: 1931 BTC. Ratio: 55808.13374 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0138 seconds



395. Post 25416201 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

As much as it amazes me, too much and too fast. Lips sealed

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 124223326 USD. Total asks: 1088 BTC. Ratio: 114126.46409 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 110.5153 seconds
Shocked



396. Post 25437479 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):



Quote from: Arriemoller on November 29, 2017, 02:14:22 PM
I would not mind a week of sideways movement, just to calm my French nerves.
Yes. It is time to stop or the crash will cause unprecedented panic.

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 130821856 USD. Total asks: 963 BTC. Ratio: 135788.92838 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 227.3804 seconds



397. Post 25669855 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 141125089 USD. Total asks: 2450 BTC. Ratio: 57596.91823 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0248 seconds
$141 million.



398. Post 25847481 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.31h):

For those interested in lambos, there's this website now: http://lambo2btc.com/.



Price data:
Quote
Bitstamp | Total bids: 141587618 USD. Total asks: 2469 BTC. Ratio: 57324.17894 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0245 seconds



399. Post 25879052 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.31h):

Quote from: Lopumbo on December 06, 2017, 09:29:50 PM
BTC is no longer accepted on Steam 'cause of high-fees and unstable price
They don't know how to use BTC, that's the actual problem. Now they act like they became smarter, whilst Lightning Integration Tests were all passed and RC candidate is almost ready. Cheesy



My body is ready.



400. Post 26625569 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on December 19, 2017, 08:59:24 PM
I have held from $13.   Still consider myself a bag holder.
Heartbreaking
Here’s a tip.  Become a Monero bag holder in a very small proportion of your portfolio.  Not because you believe but for insurance.  Insurance is expensive but none of us are smart enough to know the future.
Bitcoin is an all-or-nothing proposition. Insurance against what exactly?
Don't listen to the fools thinking that any coin comes close to Bitcoin. There is no coin that is even close to solving the scalability problem. Any "on-chain scaling solutions" are bullshit. ETH is a prime example of this. It is not possible to sync up a ETH node on consumer grade hardware in reasonable time[1] without pruning (which they had to set as default). The definition of centralized garbage.

[1] Several weeks/months on a Intel i7 Quad Core.



401. Post 26625801 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.33h):

Quote from: Lopumbo on December 19, 2017, 09:07:17 PM
come on, it wouldn't hurt anybody to up the blocksize to 2mb
Yes it would, and we can't deploy it safely within 6 months anyways. So even if we had a ready implementation right now (we do not), you wouldn't see a fork before 2019.

Quote from: Lopumbo on December 19, 2017, 09:07:17 PM
to give us some time, this centralization argument is nonsense
You're an idiot.

Quote from: Lopumbo on December 19, 2017, 09:07:17 PM
any argument against bigger blocks can be destroyed with techniques like graphene (x100 block compression)
Graphene doesn't exist and what it *tries to solve* is not the only problem that we have.

Quote from: Lopumbo on December 19, 2017, 09:07:17 PM
segwit ist fucking complicated to be implemented by exchanges
It is not.

Quote from: Lopumbo on December 19, 2017, 09:07:17 PM
in the foreseeable future and LN comes in 18 month™
No.

Quote from: Lopumbo on December 19, 2017, 09:07:17 PM
let the market decide  Tongue
Stop shilling and get educated, idiot.



402. Post 26679371 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.34h):



Anytime now. Where will all this USD go to?  Cheesy



403. Post 27478520 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.37h):

Quote from: kosse on January 04, 2018, 04:08:55 PM
But I still think 2018 will be remembered as the year bitcoin was replaced. I just don't see the services adopting segwit that could maybe still save the day (along with LN).
If you think that, you truly are an ignorant idiot. If you can't comprehend why "Bitcoin is being banned by X or Y" while they spam promote ETH and Ripple (et al.), then you will be playing right in their hands. That which they can not control, is that which they will actively fight. Be wary of *coins* (Ripple is not even a cryptocurrency) which the government or banks are not trying to fight against.

Simple example: https://www.express.co.uk/finance/city/899902/Bitcoin-price-LIVE-Coin-slammed-biggest-ponzi-scheme-in-history-as-price-falls.



404. Post 29080564 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.40h):

Quote from: Searing on January 28, 2018, 05:08:12 AM
I read just now, that the 'lightning network' for BTC is now LIVE...

here is the link

https://www.finder.com.au/bitcoin-price-weekly-analysis-2018-01-28

seems sketchy as the only article I can find...do they mean just live on 'mainnet' to test
It's not sketchy at all. Most of the software has not even reached Beta version, however a lot of people are already using it on the mainnet:



800 channels: https://lnmainnet.gaben.win.

Quote from: Searing on January 28, 2018, 05:19:30 AM
Do they have a 'timeline' or are they being the usual 'bitcoin core' coy ...about if/when/ever anything they do is 'ready' Smiley
LN developers =/= Bitcoin Core developers although some might have contributed to both. It will be ready whenever they feel it can guarantee that users won't lose any funds due to a weird bug.



405. Post 29748818 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff_Original on February 06, 2018, 09:30:17 PM
um , am I seeing a 1500+ BTC bid on stamp?
You're not the only one.



406. Post 31224055 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):





Bullish?



407. Post 34156554 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):



Looks familiar? Source.



408. Post 34165621 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 07, 2018, 04:43:11 PM
very quick short list  for a small "game list" or how i have to call it..... only  when breaking 12288 dollar price.....  almost same rules as the list before just a winning date AND
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              .15 BTC for correct date
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              only accounts with minimum 5 Merit and 20 activity (last time to many new pop't up Roll Eyes  )
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              LIST CLOSES tuesday 12 CET allways CET time  no execptions
just for quick enjoyment

normal tommorrow i look @the dates.... firts one posted has the choosen date , some one with the same date have too take another one so look out a bit....
DATES sended in PERSONAL MESSAGE will    NOT count

let us break back 5-digits
I'll take 21. July 2018. Thanks.



409. Post 47917336 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: Elwar on November 15, 2018, 07:35:08 AM
So has it split yet? Where can I sell cash abc and cash sv for bitcoins?
Not yet. You can follow the scam coin here:
http://hashwars.cash/
https://cash.coin.dance/



410. Post 47977673 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on November 17, 2018, 06:20:47 AM
If segwit has a fatal flaw then how has bitcoin survived for a year?  It has a 100B jackpot for the first person to crack it.  Even if they could only get 1/2 a % they'd be set for life.

Where's the hack?
The flaw is that the incompetent side has an inferiority complex; they are unable to produce anything remotely beneficial thus they have to FUD Bitcoin.

Quote from: infofront on November 17, 2018, 06:50:20 AM
If a malicious actor were to gain control of 51%+ of the network hash power, he could change the network rules, rescind segwit, and take all the coins that were in segwit addresses.

Of course, there's a significant chance no one would use the compromised network except the attacker, which would make the whole thing moot.
At which point they chain would diverge, and they'd create Bitcoin No-Segwit. Non issue.

If you're unstable and desperate to gain recognition for non-existing contributions, no wonder you'd be envious of this man.




411. Post 48367145 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.17h):

Cat turned on the rocket boosters?  Cheesy



412. Post 49256608 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: wavessurfing on January 16, 2019, 05:25:51 AM
present time is open to attacks or feared attacks.

ETH fork constantinople is postponed.

https://www.coindesk.com/ethereums-constantinople-upgrade-faces-delay-due-to-security-vulnerability
Incompetent children rushing i.e. forcing a fork. #Decentralized smart contracts. Roll Eyes

Quote from: bitebits on January 16, 2019, 06:22:36 AM
Thanks for sharing, indeed a worthwhile tweet storm. Seen some of the quotes before, but interesting when all put together.
Whenever someone uses Satoshi's Vision as a counter argument you can automatically assume that they've lost. This is science, not a religion. The tweet storm was nicely written.



413. Post 49308615 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):




Bullish? Roll Eyes



414. Post 49449323 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: Cryptotourist on January 27, 2019, 12:17:02 PM
I'll take a safe bet that it will reach at least $500 within the next 3-5 years.
-snip-
Keep dreaming. This is how/why we have pump/dumps. One out of every n people is going to believe that and buy into the coin without knowing a single thing about it.

Quote from: wachtwoord on January 27, 2019, 12:41:54 PM
Kind of ashame the mining schedule sucks cause other than that Mimblewimble is very elegant. Maybe they will get it right on the 3rd try? Wink
Mimblewimble as a sidechain with non absurd specifications; otherwise it is pointlesss.

Quote from: Cryptotourist on January 27, 2019, 01:04:01 PM
One more fact that I've noticed. Many Dev's on Grin ATM.
-snip-
Not really, no. Don't look at absolute numbers, look into the actual data.




415. Post 49645498 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

Quote from: kingcolex on February 08, 2019, 04:47:10 PM
$3,500 incoming? And if that barrier breaks where we stop who knows?
Broken @stamp.



416. Post 49702692 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.31h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 12, 2019, 04:52:47 AM
The moment Vinny Lingham backs it, you know it is a scam



It seems there are some big blockers supporting smaller blocks in the hopes of destroying bitcoin.
Hahahahahaha
Touché.

Agreed that Vinny is not exactly a trustworthy or credible character in the bitcoin space based on some of his past behaviors.   In other words, whatever Vinny says should be taken with a BIG ass grain of salt.  
-snip-
My pet monkey is smarter than Vinny by quite the margin. For those that actually do understand the tech and the scaling issues (not just in Bitcoin but in general software), then they would understand that Luke actually makes very-good arguments from a technical perspective but he kind-of forgets that Bitcoin is not just tech. Now if everyone understood that the UTXO set size is kind-of only bound by the block size, they would pretty much never advocate for any significant block size increase. A lot needs to change before we could be considered *ready* for a good proposal, although it's possible that we never reach consensus.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 12, 2019, 04:52:47 AM
I had read some previous posts in this thread, and maybe some other threads suggesting that "we" focus on Schnorr signatures, fungibility, privacy and other more important bitcoin development matters, which reminds me of the quote from a famous little girl.
That is already underway, it just isn't ready.



417. Post 50335221 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):



Hmm...



418. Post 50419897 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

It has been a while since I posted this one.




419. Post 50422089 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Quote from: JSRAW on April 02, 2019, 09:56:09 AM



Main Source : Last of the V8s Cheesy

Why are you two doxxing me??



420. Post 50425527 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Quote from: mfort312 on April 02, 2019, 02:23:12 PM
Nice timing, NYT.

Published this morning

Amid Bitcoin Uncertainty, ‘the Smart Money Knows That Crypto Is Not Ready’
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/02/technology/cryptocurrency-bust-wall-street.html

Like the people that looked into it understood anything more than the basics. What a joke. Cheesy

Quote from: kingcolex on April 02, 2019, 02:23:30 PM
In other news gizmodo is completely fucking retarded.

https://gizmodo.com/bitcoin-surges-15-overnight-because-nobody-learned-the-1833737971
Gizmodo writers are pretty retarded when it comes to Bitcoin. There's no 'write-the-truth' requirement for "journalism" anymore.



421. Post 50437937 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Quote from: kenzawak on April 03, 2019, 10:12:05 AM
Quote
However, not everyone seems to be overwhelmed. Crypto analyst Nic Trades warned her 93,000 followers on Twitter to watch for signs that the recent surge is a false breakout.

She says a 50% drop from the height of the swing across the major exchanges is the key number to watch.

“If we come back more than 50% of this swing, that’s where I would be concerned and would say that this is probably a false breakout… I would be a little bit less bullish if we close back underneath the 200-day moving average line. A daily close under $4,714 wouldn’t be quite so positive.”
All this means is that Nic Trades went short, no actual analysis of any kind. Stop following fakes. DYOR.



422. Post 50446230 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: alevlaslo on April 03, 2019, 06:56:52 PM
again congestion in bitcoin because of a small block

Komodo has an automatic adjustment of the block size https://www.kmdexplorer.io/charts/block-size
Komodo can royally fuck off together with the mentally diseased bcash/bsv baboons. When it comes to scaling technology, I'll be better off consulting with Patrick Star. Redone.



423. Post 50455165 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: somac. on April 04, 2019, 11:02:39 AM
Anybody seeing that sell wall on Stamp. Pretty damn big.
Fake sell pressure.



424. Post 50677411 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: Retina on April 19, 2019, 04:39:11 PM
Still on same short view guys, Now BTC is painting a BAT pattern , we should keep close eyes on the mini rising channel where the BAT inscribed in, if price keep holding below the previous high may signal huge dump ahead.
Which is exactly what someone who just shorted would predict. Try again. Roll Eyes



425. Post 50716129 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: Icygreen on April 22, 2019, 12:41:03 AM
Yeah, me too actually, I wish the muslims would just stop killing innocent people.
If they keep this up it will end very badly for them.
-snip-
I'd wager that Muslims didn't even have a hand in this.  
Quote
"A foreign intelligence agency has reported that the NTJ (National Thowheeth Jama'ath) is planning to carry out suicide attacks targeting prominent churches as well as the Indian high commission in Colombo," said the alert.

The NTJ is a radical Muslim group in Sri Lanka that came to notice last year when it was linked to the vandalism of Buddhist statues.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/04/21/sri-lanka-explosions-casualties-churches-hotels-targeted-easter/
Quite the kool-aid drinker you are. It's not unlikely that this was the US's doing nevertheless; way too coordinated for some random faith-bamboozled monkeys.

Can we get back to the topic at hand? You can play out your "religion is good" nonsense here.



426. Post 50749302 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 24, 2019, 08:34:50 AM
Ahhhh man  Undecided
That fraudulent coin has struck a partership with that club? Eww. I don't expect LC fans to be any smarter than average monkeys about this. When you think about a real cryptocurrency, how could Bitcoin partner up with a club? Who would we send, fake Jesus or fake Satoshi? Roll Eyes



427. Post 50749487 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on April 24, 2019, 08:56:56 AM
That fraudulent coin has struck a partership with that club? Eww. I don't expect LC fans to be any smarter than average monkeys about this. When you think about a real cryptocurrency, how could Bitcoin partner up with a club? Who would we send, fake Jesus or fake Satoshi? Roll Eyes
If Justin Sun is to be believed for one moment, the partnership was suggested by Liverpool.
*inserts 'But Why?' gif. They literally have nothing to gain from this unless there are money deals in the background.


Quote from: Last of the V8s on April 24, 2019, 08:56:56 AM
Those against this should write to their CEO, sometime technologist and obvious dolt @PeterMooreLFC
Fans gonna lose money...
Whoever is a fan of this club please do so.

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 24, 2019, 08:59:47 AM
We could send cryptohunter - He could bamboozle them with the copious amount of bull shit that comes outbof his mouth.
Please don't waste bytes mentioning that fool, thanks.



428. Post 50749628 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on April 24, 2019, 09:07:41 AM
^^You got a link to the article showing tron code was a copy of another shitcoin? iirc
any other debunking material?

also theymos please put a half-crown in the meter, we got a football crisis ova heah
Newer things:
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/af3fuj/something_fishy_is_going_on_with_the_tron/.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/bfar3t/why_i_feel_scammed_by_the_trx_project/?ref_source=embed&ref=share
Older things:
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/7qfjef/tron_gets_caught_again_plagiarised_white_paper/

^they even stole the shit paper. This ought to be enough for you folk. Go destroy them.



429. Post 50766307 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 25, 2019, 09:01:33 AM
In crypto there are only 2 proper networks available:


What about lightning network?  Doesn't that count as something to be specified, even though it is a sub-category of bitcoin?
There is a lightning network on mainnet, and a separate lightning network on testnet. It exists as part of the relevant chain not as a different category. Please don't spread this confusion.



430. Post 50773586 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 25, 2019, 10:54:56 AM
^Yow "RED trust queen" get yourself a HAT  Tongue

XhomerX can make something with cats and red I guess Cheesy
I could, yes. Where is my 4k HAT?



431. Post 50783804 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on April 26, 2019, 02:13:33 PM
^Yow "RED trust queen" get yourself a HAT  Tongue

XhomerX can make something with cats and red I guess Cheesy
I could, yes. Where is my 4k HAT?
It's not only 4K but also waterproof to 40 meters. 

Avatar-sized

 
I have evolved to a new level. Thank you kind sir/ma'am. Cheesy



432. Post 50785088 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 26, 2019, 04:30:00 PM
Hey, that looks too much like mine...  Cry Cry

What if you changed the color to red, especially since Lauda continues as the "red paint queen".. .or at least splatter some red paint on there.   Wink     Cheesy Cheesy
I wouldn't mind it in red, or partially splashed red. Not sure if it would look better. Embarrassed

Quote from: BobLawblaw on April 26, 2019, 04:30:15 PM
Sheeeit.

We're going below $5k, aren't we ?  Cry
Bitcoin is dead.



433. Post 50800253 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

I'm ready for the moon now. Are you?



434. Post 50820825 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: somac. on April 29, 2019, 10:14:12 AM
This is under the assumption that the block size wouldn't grow when needed, blocks aren't full without outside attacks so there's no evidence that when the time comes we won't increase the block size to a common sense size.

Well, other than the evidence that blocks were kept small the last time they became persistently full. Which, in itself, is pretty strong evidence.

Once the need resurfaces (and it most certainly will), how long do you think it will take to implement the necessary change?
That was a short spam attack period, you know damn well that was artificial and everyone knew it.

Yes, I remember people posting the addresses of the spammers at the time. That's the good thing about 1mb blocks, spamming gets expensive.
Big blocks are a disaster if there isn't sufficient utility. Say you had 32 MB blocks and only < 2 MB of actual traffic. Someone could easily spam 28 MB per block for peanuts. Sustained over 1 day: 4032 MB of garbage for almost free. Good idea indeed.



435. Post 50926513 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-May/016914.html
https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commits/taproot

Today is a good day.  Wink



436. Post 50931107 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: prophetx on May 07, 2019, 05:26:43 AM
Nice, ethereums pumping hard to.
Who, here, besides you, and a few troll/shills gives any shits about that crap?
plenty of stupid people
FTFY. ETH is a horribly designed and very inefficient smart-contract platform. Unlike Bitcoin, it actually will have many better competitors as soon as it switches to POS. Don't shill that garbage.

Quote from: VB1001 on May 07, 2019, 05:14:08 AM
Bitcoin Developer Publishes Two Proposals for a Taproot Soft Fork

https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-developer-publishes-two-proposals-for-a-taproot-soft-fork/amp

Good morning WO,s
Quote from: Lauda on May 06, 2019, 07:01:28 PM
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-May/016914.html
https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commits/taproot

Today is a good day.  Wink



437. Post 50979646 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote
Tulips, fraud, ponzi scheme, dead... slow, inefficient and unreliable... volatile... And yet it threatens to "take power away from the USD"? Interesting.
I'm not the author, sourced somewhere from Reddit.  Smiley



438. Post 50992061 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on May 11, 2019, 06:41:34 AM
I might have Jinxed it. Wink
No, you posses no such power.

Quote from: Paashaas on May 11, 2019, 06:40:42 AM
Going to eat cat food if it blast through $7k+ resistance.
I'd recommend that you eat cat food either way. Tongue



439. Post 50992337 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on May 11, 2019, 06:54:08 AM
Going to eat cat food if it blast through $7k+ resistance.
I'd recommend that you eat cat food either way. Tongue
+1 WOsMerit
Where can I trade this currency?

Quote from: VB1001 on May 11, 2019, 06:54:40 AM
-snip-
I see your gif and raise you the current me:




440. Post 51003630 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: Ibian on May 11, 2019, 09:34:04 PM
the entire blockchain on your mobile phone? wow. let´s hope they sell a lot of them. good news!
Yeah let's run a node on a piece of spyware, what could possibly go wrong.
Nothing will go wrong. You need to consider who adversaries are, what they might gain, etc. It is perfectly okay to run a node on a mobile phone. Actually, running your own node on a phone would be a significant security improvement in comparison to SPV wallets.



441. Post 51009673 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Second attempt at crashing it.  Roll Eyes



442. Post 51042241 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

I can say one thing at this time, finding large OTC sellers is currently impossible and the buyer queue keeps growing.



443. Post 51042707 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on May 14, 2019, 08:58:21 AM
I can say one thing at this time, finding large OTC sellers is currently impossible and the buyer queue keeps growing.
Source?  

I mean, they would be dumb to sell, but can we back that up?
I'm the source on this one. Knocked at many doors, can't find a seller for someone who is looking around. I'm actually surprised that we aren't mooning even harder given this demand.



444. Post 51318294 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: serveria.com on June 02, 2019, 09:32:33 AM
Well, this is putting the 100K party Vegas location in jeopardy.

I thought it was agreed that we wouldn't do the party in the US, for our various international friends who have problems stepping onto US soil ?

Canada in the summer is nice (British Columbia ?), although I think somewhere in Europe might be an alternative (Spain ? The Netherlands ? Belgium ? Someplace that has no trouble with English)

Mexico or anywhere South America are out of contention for security reasons.
Caribbean could be a great location. My second choice is Ibiza or Mallorca both islands can be a lot of fun. We'll need a giant seafront villa with a private beach. We'll need to book two special flights - one from Colombia carrying well you know 'stuff' and one from Eastern Europe carrying elite female and male escorts for WO members....  Grin Grin Grin  
Using the US as a location for such an event is just irresponsible and reckless. It's an out-of-control police state. The Caribbean sounds like a good location or the safer choices within the EU (definitely not the UK).



445. Post 51414184 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: criptix on June 09, 2019, 11:01:36 PM
Weekly close looks very ugly and points to a trend reversal.

We might revisit 6k range in the coming weeks/months.
You know nothing, but might end up being temporarily right just out of sheer luck. Cute.



446. Post 51449780 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Time to attack $9k again?  Cheesy



447. Post 51449861 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on June 13, 2019, 07:15:49 AM
Time to attack $9k again?  Cheesy
Indeed
Your hat has made Vegeta temporarily weak I'm afraid. You must train harder.



448. Post 51452021 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 13, 2019, 09:51:37 AM
Time to attack $9k again?  Cheesy
soonTM

but need to wait, though when we do $10k is not so far behind as 8 was from 7 and closer than 9 will be to 8.

Properly breaching $10k will be lovely, but hopefully not the same as breaching $9k was.



449. Post 51453154 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: jojo69 on June 13, 2019, 12:47:58 PM
here's why "climate change" should never become humanity's focus ... imagine exhausting the global economy and killing off significant proportions of populations in the name of "the environment" ... and then god shows up to roll the dice on humans??

https://www.colorado.edu/today/2019/06/05/superflares

humanity has bigger problems to exhaust our known available energies and resources against than preserving a fictiously 'pristine', unobtainable environment nirvana.
So that's the good reason to go on shitting where we eat, because a solar flare or an asteroid or something might show up and make the whole thing moot?

...  smh
It isn't. Humans, as they are living today, are the cancer to the planet. They should strive to remain effective while maximizing efficiency - just like Bitcoin Core is doing for Bitcoin.  Wink



450. Post 51461557 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: Pamoldar on June 14, 2019, 06:03:04 AM
May be you will win some BTC. It's only 0.002BTC to join.
This only might be a lot of money in the future. I'd rather not.  Tongue



451. Post 51461875 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Support the flags of your choosing(!) on Roger Ver and BSV (& more) to protect newbies. Be careful and read the description of the flags before doing anything - you are making the decision to support a flag on your own:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=52 (Roger Ver)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=40 (Bitcoin SV Flag 1)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=60 (Bitcoin SV Flag 2)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=103 (sgbett)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=77 (realr0ach)

Quote from: Pamoldar on June 14, 2019, 06:27:41 AM
@Lauda
How about now? 😉

Join the prediction pool, If I win then I will sponsor half of your entry fee

Come on girl, it's only 0.001BTC Now (if I win 🙂)
Thank you kind sir, but this one isn't a fan of gambling.  Tongue



452. Post 51461972 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: mindrust on June 14, 2019, 07:00:01 AM
Support the flags on Roger Ver and BSV to protect newbies:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=52
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=60

@Lauda
How about now? 😉

Join the prediction pool, If I win then I will sponsor half of your entry fee

Come on girl, it's only 0.001BTC Now (if I win 🙂)
Thank you kind sir, but this one isn't a fan of gambling.  Tongue
The first 2 flags don't have a broken contract. (That's why theymos opposed them)  I think you should re-create those flags.
Who gives a duck what theymos thinks. If he wants to protect scammers and enable them to further scam it is his choice. I shall not. Now go away/stop following me - by harassing me you are committing implied direct contractual harm to me.



453. Post 51462020 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: bitserve on June 14, 2019, 07:05:22 AM


Or maybe BTC would have had the full combined price and maybe even more?


I don't think those shitcoins  has any effect in bitcoins prize.
I am talking about the time when the fork happened on August 2017. It is a valid theory that BCH "extracted" some value (price wise) from BTC even if that was hard to notice due to the exponentially price increase it was happening.
It was the right time to deploy it; if it was started in a bear market it would be dead and there would be no BSV either.

Quote from: Lauda on June 14, 2019, 06:51:38 AM
Support the flags on Roger Ver and BSV to protect newbies:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=52
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=60



454. Post 51462185 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: Lauda on June 14, 2019, 06:51:38 AM
Support the flags on Roger Ver and BSV (& more) to protect newbies:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=52
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=60
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=103
Will keep expanding list.

Quote from: fillippone on June 14, 2019, 07:13:24 AM
That's why I will be forever grateful to Roger Ver: he basically gave me some of his BTC for free.
Bitcoin Gold is far better. Less scammy and decent return if you sold them at the right time (4-5%).



455. Post 51462213 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: d_eddie on June 14, 2019, 07:27:50 AM
Masterluc posted a 3-month head and shoulder chart without any comment but a laugh.
On that chart, we're at the top of the right shoulder.
Most head and shoulder charts are scam. Some get it right by pure coincidence (1mil predictions, 1 bound to be right). Ignore.



456. Post 51465638 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: realr0ach on June 14, 2019, 01:24:39 PM
I'm a crying metal bagholder.
FTFY. Are you always this desperate?

Quote from: Lauda on June 14, 2019, 06:51:38 AM
Support the flags of your choosing(!) on Roger Ver and BSV (& more) to protect newbies. Be careful and read the description of the flags before doing anything - you are making the decision to support a flag on your own:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=52 (Roger Ver)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=40 (Bitcoin SV Flag 1)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=60 (Bitcoin SV Flag 2)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=103 (sgbett)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=77 (realr0ach)
Time to include this again.

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 14, 2019, 01:32:59 PM
this price action is most satisfactory
Could do with smashing through $8,500
Yes please.



457. Post 51466388 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: Hueristic on June 14, 2019, 01:51:34 PM
I did originally support https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=40 one on Bitcoin SV but for the good of the board feel that it does not actually raise to the level of that particular flag so instead support this flag https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=60
Actually you should support it. You should not listen to theymos and enable even further people to get scammed. BSV is equally scamming users if not worse, especially with their conferences where they tell uneducated folk that BSV is Bitcoin. Just because these people are not using the forum, that doesn't mean that BSV hasn't scammed anyone. I'm, beyond a doubt, certain that folk have bought it after being misled by BSV/NChain.

Quote from: Hueristic on June 14, 2019, 01:51:34 PM
ADDED:
This one looks like it will take more time than I'm willing to spend to make a decision on and I read a few pages so I'll pass on it as I don't feel I know enough to make an informed decision.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=103
He is delusional at best or a well-paid shill at worst. He is continuously spreading lies about LN and SegWit as well as claiming that BSV is superior. This is an outright lie and should be handled as such. Marked here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2541338.msg51466362#msg51466362.



458. Post 51466707 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: jbreher on June 14, 2019, 03:00:10 PM
Any other thread in Economics, and this crap would be deleted as off-topic. Why don't you crawl back to drama-ville where this shit belongs?
I'll be bringing up the full list, which will soon include you in every price-related thread every other day. As this is harmful to the price and the investments of the individuals it is very much on-topic. Either way: As long as the main part of your post is on-topic, you can quote whatever you want from wherever you want. Don't sweat it, you won't be forgotten. Smiley Also stop breaking the forum rules with consecutive posting.

Quote from: VB1001 on June 14, 2019, 02:35:59 PM
GrumpyKitty
What do I have to do so that my cat also has its own name?

I had not noticed this detail. Shocked

There is always a superior class.
You have to be an apprentice of master theymos (dark-arts of moderation) and then become the master yourself. A proper title might have a positive effect on the price though. Tongue



459. Post 51467057 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: infofront on June 14, 2019, 03:27:21 PM
Lets try to keep the Meta drama to a minimum. Obviously, off-topicness happens here, and the trust/flag stuff is tangentially related to various degrees, but there are better places to litigate all of that.
It has nothing to do with Meta any more; only price-related entities and users related to this section. It's a hand-picked list after all. No new posts will be created, the existing post will be occasionally incorporated into a new post as a side-note which is perfectly fair IMO.

Quote from: Last of the V8s on June 14, 2019, 03:34:56 PM
You're going too far, Lauda, if you advise the good people of this thread to defy theymos or to sign contract-flags that aren't air-tight.
Incorrect. I don't advise anyone to do anything. I created a list of dangerous individuals and/or scammers and ask people to support flags that they want to. I support all of them and strongly believe that theymoses judgement has been contaminated (possible legal pressure, pressure by the domain owner, etc.). You don't have to support those that you do not want to. It's important that the list is there and protects both newbies and the price. Smiley I have reworded the post as it seems that you and others are scared of big-bad-theymos. FYI: The contractual flag on Roger Ver is correct; the one on BSV is debatable. The remaining flags are all within the guidelines. Gathering support for flags as a side-note is on-topic everywhere.

Quote from: El duderino_ on June 14, 2019, 03:36:20 PM
But exactly as infofront says keep it minimum in here, cause this is the finest hangout thread of the entire forum with a lot of regular good guys/members that share some cool on as off topic stuff that we all can appriciate......
I'm trying to keep it at a minimum but people keep responding to it. That's not the intended behaviour of creating a note with a quote. Back to the price with y'all. Cheesy



460. Post 51467252 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: VB1001 on June 14, 2019, 03:48:34 PM
woman-hater Roach

Bullshit.  I'm simply for equality, which means the horrific monster known as the western woman stepping down 500 notches from her current pedestal.  After we've achieved equality, we can then decide on if women should be lowered further since only patriarchal civilizations are actually functional.
You have a brain full of stupid birds that do not let you see reality, your vision of women is something like this, so would you be happy?

-snip-

If your answer is yes, you need medical attention.

You have a very wrong idea of ​​what a woman is.
Maximum sexism with that one indeed. I'm not even a supporter of the feminist movement. Tongue



461. Post 51467753 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: fillippone on June 14, 2019, 04:44:25 PM
Yeah, maybe best to keep the WO as trust-meta-drama-reputation-less  as possible, we can really mis that sh*t in here cause we already have our r0ach in this space...

But exactly as infofront says keep it minimum in here, cause this is the finest hangout thread of the entire forum with a lot of regular good guys/members that share some cool on as off topic stuff that we all can appriciate......
Best post here since last DT1 rotation.
I already committed to keep WO drama-free.
I liked the happy safe place: it's a family, and like every family  we discuss, we laugh, sometime we argue, we have the uncle we never liked, or the bossy cousin,  but we kept drama away.
Can we please revert to it?
That is nonsense and utopian thinking until rule-abusers like roach are banned, which they will not be because modern liberalists are horrible at creating and enforcing any policies. Oh wait, this is turning into Politics now. Unforeseen side-effects of one's wishes. Tongue It's best to just stop responding to anything related to what you don't want to see in here. Simple as that.

Quote from: Torque on June 14, 2019, 04:36:40 PM
...even stands a chance against gold and silver.
Oh wow look, gold is approaching the same price it first hit...wait for it...in 2010.  Tongue

I wonder if a person was better off buying Bitcoin instead of gold in 2010? Hmmm brb lemme check the charts...  Grin
What if I turn the charts upside down? Does that mean Gold is winning? Cheesy



462. Post 51474347 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on June 15, 2019, 12:47:03 AM
Apart from fundamentals (they should go down anyway), it's most likely Binance news.
Hey Bob, do you still want to sell some at 11K?
Well, glad I have no ability to short on Gemini, and not sure what possessed me to consider a small short position. Nice to see the corn growing. Not FOMOing into these prices.
Should have read my post and ignored the scam head and shoulder call by another TA conman. Bitcoin does not play by your rules, Bitcoin makes its own rules.

Quote from: BobLawblaw on June 15, 2019, 12:47:03 AM
No, do not plan on selling any corn before 2021-2022 - After the halvening - at which point, will be looking to divest a mil or two, to buy a ranch with Rick.
Excellent plan.



463. Post 51475567 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: d_eddie on June 15, 2019, 11:29:32 AM
By the way, after laughing silently at the H&S pattern, here's Masterluc latest update.

Quote from: Masterluc
The right shoulder is too high by now, the pattern is breaking.

So maybe his noncommital "he he he" comment at the Head & Shoulders was just a way to chicken out of any prediction.

I told ya'. Smiley The only reason for which that dude was ever correct about anything is because he made an absurd number of predictions.



464. Post 51484923 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Welp, I'm quite late with my Vegeta picture (had it ready the whole day yesterday). $10k incoming?



It's that time again (bound for some expansion soon).
Quote from: Lauda on June 14, 2019, 06:51:38 AM
Support the flags of your choosing(!) on Roger Ver and BSV (& more) to protect newbies. Be careful and read the description of the flags before doing anything - you are making the decision to support a flag on your own:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=52 (Roger Ver)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=40 (Bitcoin SV Flag 1)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=60 (Bitcoin SV Flag 2)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=103 (sgbett)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=77 (realr0ach)



465. Post 51486066 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

https://twitter.com/Excellion/status/1140081408913768448




466. Post 51490273 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: fillippone on June 16, 2019, 04:36:08 PM
Time for a new Hat?
Vegeta hat worked fine.
Do we have a 5 digits hat? Xhomerx10 do you have something appropriate?
Good question. What meme is appropriate for 10k?



467. Post 51497098 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: Traxo on June 17, 2019, 08:56:27 AM
Relaying from blogger.  
Exact link for that bullshit? Oh wait, it's anonymint. Please don't share the brain-damaging content from that degenerate. You can not revert SegWit without full network consensus, there is no attack.



468. Post 51500352 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: Retina on June 17, 2019, 01:30:15 PM
Can you, for the love of God, stop spamming the thread with useless huge pictures of child paintings?



469. Post 51500920 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on June 17, 2019, 02:27:30 PM
Same could go for posting FLAG support in the WO-thread ::
How many pixels do those useless paintings need? How many pixels does the flag support quote need? Don't bullshit me. Retina has become a merit-farming shitposter, zero substance. Regardless, if one doesn't support half of those flags then their judgement is compromised.



470. Post 51502411 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: bitserve on June 17, 2019, 03:20:55 PM
If you can do something to keep realr0ach out of here then I am sure you will receive an overwhelming support. Other than that it is not such a big issue.
Read my personal text. That will explain why mr. r0ach is still allowed to be around. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯



471. Post 51502553 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 17, 2019, 05:37:08 PM
If you can do something to keep realr0ach out of here then I am sure you will receive an overwhelming support. Other than that it is not such a big issue.
Read my personal text. That will explain why mr. r0ach is still allowed to be around. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Try living in the UK, full of liberals, crying & whinging bitches. It’s what drags the country down & allows people to dictate to us how we should live in our own fucking country but that’s a whole, lengthy discussion for another forum possibly.
I am very well familiar with the stupidity that has engulfed the UK. It one of the worst shitholes to live in today primarily to everything that you've listed (and a few other things, CCTV anyone?). Imagine that, a western highly-developed country = complete shithole. That's a discussion for P&S section, but that one has a roach called TECSHARE. It's best to discuss these things off-forum.  Smiley



472. Post 51503097 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: sirazimuth on June 17, 2019, 06:40:43 PM

I am very well familiar with the stupidity that has engulfed the UK. It one of the worst shitholes to live in today primarily to everything that you've listed (and a few other things, CCTV anyone?). Imagine that, a western highly-developed country = complete shithole. That's a discussion for P&S section, but that one has a roach called TECSHARE. It's best to discuss these things off-forum.  Smiley
Speaking from experience are we?
Though I currently reside in USA, I have lived for a number of years in the UK (dual citizen)
Though the plumbing maybe antiquated (among other slight annoying inconveniences) it is
certainly  not a “shithole” ...quite the contrary imo. They don’t have a moron president or a retarded gun culture and you don’t go bankrupt for getting ill.
But like you said that’s a discussion for P+S section and the mighty tecshare and all.
Then again I suppose making blatantly subjective posts like that will no doubt gain you lots of
friends in here (and maybe a couple of enemies , idk). It’s the WO after all....
Quite the fallacy there. Saying UK is bad doesn't mean that something else isn't equally bad or worse. Both USA and UK are utter and complete shitholes. Living in literal shit is better than living in either one of those countries. Take that however you want. I'd expect WO people which are living in either one of those to jump ship and never look back as soon as they start *retiring* with their Bitkorn.



473. Post 51507618 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: nutildah on June 18, 2019, 06:37:49 AM
If I left it up to you wankers to get my news from, I'd think the world was on the verge of collapse.
Another Brit detected?  Cheesy



474. Post 51511673 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: fillippone on June 18, 2019, 12:49:03 PM
Of course someone is scared this Libra thing could actually work after all:

France Calls for Central Bank Review of Facebook Cryptocurrency

Quote
Facebook Inc.’s ambitious plan to roll out its own cryptocurrency ran into immediate political opposition in Europe, with calls for tighter regulation of the social-media giant.
French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said the digital currency known as Libra shouldn’t be seen as a replacement for traditional currencies.
“It is out of question’’ that Libra “become a sovereign currency,’’ LeMaire said in an interview on Europe 1 radio. “It can’t and it must not happen.”
They aren't wrong though. It can not become a sovereign currency as it is centralized garbage by a company.They can call it permissioned all they want, it's worthless. The Libra garbage absolutely does not need blockchain in any way, but there will be many gullible kool-aid drinkers falling for this scam.



475. Post 51511779 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: VB1001 on June 18, 2019, 01:24:10 PM
Thoughts on Libra “Blockchain”

Quote
I’m pretty sure that would be a world first of a distributed network transitioning from permissioned to permissionless. Perhaps the network as a whole can switch to PoS, but in order for the stablecoin peg / basket to be maintained, some set of entities must keep a bridge open to the traditional financial system. This will be a persistent point of centralized control via the Libra Association.
https://medium.com/@lopp/thoughts-on-libra-blockchain-49b8f6c26372
Sadly, not worth the time to read that. Terrible shitcoin.



476. Post 51511886 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: fillippone on June 18, 2019, 01:31:08 PM
According to the technical White Paper there should be ways to remain pseudonymous

Quote
Account addresses.
An account address is a 256-bit value. To create a new account, a user
first generates a fresh verification/signature key-pair (vk, sk) for a signature scheme and uses the
cryptographic hash of the public verification key vk as an account address a = H(vk).1
The new account is created in the ledger state when a transaction sent from an existing account invokes the
create_account(a) Move instruction. This typically happens when a transaction attempts to send
Libra to an account at address a that has not yet been created.
Once the new account is created at a, the user can sign transactions to be sent from that account
using the private signing key sk. The user can also rotate the key used to sign transactions from the
account without changing its address, e.g., to proactively change the key or to respond to a possible
compromise of the key.

The Libra protocol does not link accounts to a real-world identity. A user is free to create multiple
accounts by generating multiple key-pairs. Accounts controlled by the same user have no inherent
link to each other. This scheme follows the example of Bitcoin and Ethereum in that it provides
pseudonymity [19] for users.


1 Concretely we instantiate hash functions with SHA3-256 [17] and digital signatures with EdDSA using the ed-
wards25519 curve [18].
https://developers.libra.org/docs/assets/papers/the-libra-blockchain.pdf


KYC is not at protocol leve, but at Wallet Level:

Quote
Is AML/KYC required?

Apparently not at the protocol level, but the Calibra wallet states that all users will be verified via government issued ID. It also sounds like the Calibra wallet will be the only available wallet at least for a while, so it’s unclear if developers and users can run apps on the Libra network that don’t abide by the same standards as Calibra.

https://medium.com/@lopp/thoughts-on-libra-blockchain-49b8f6c26372
Right and what if all the permissioned wallets i.e. wallets that are allowed to operate have KYC? What exactly does no-KYC at protocol level bring you? Don't get conned by the whitepaper. Most average Joes will be conned into the KYC wallet by FB anyways.



477. Post 51511961 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: fillippone on June 18, 2019, 01:37:21 PM
What i am saying is that this coin is totally different from BTC, but there are some markets that aren't covered by BTC (yet).
This is incorrect. BTC covers every part of the world, legal or not. For those where it is illegal, it is unlikely that this thing would be legal. Even if it becomes legal, those people will get conned by associating Libra with something that it isn't AND will get harmed once they find this our:
* Sent money with dangerous description? Flagged.
* Sent money to dangerous address? Flagged.
* Sent money to someone we don't like? Flagged.

Quote from: fillippone on June 18, 2019, 01:37:21 PM
Until then I am afraid we should rely on those subpar Libra- style solutions.
No, don't spread that or you will harm a lot of people.

Quote from: VB1001 on June 18, 2019, 01:36:51 PM
I agree with you, obviously it is shit, I said it in a previous post, but there are many people who read us and we must give arguments so that they understand. Wink
I needed to read one sentence to understand all the arguments against it. Heck, you need only to read 2 words to be against it: Facebook, Mastercard/Visa.  Smiley



478. Post 51512010 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: fillippone on June 18, 2019, 01:40:08 PM
Maybe my broken English made me not clear: Libra is a KYC'd solution.
The KYC doesn't come from the protocol itself, but from the gateways used to access this protocol (wallets).
Well it comes off as: Not at protocol level and thus can be bypassed. This statement would be incorrect. It's good that you clarified though.

Quote from: fillippone on June 18, 2019, 01:42:44 PM
What i am saying is that this coin is totally different from BTC, but there are some markets that aren't covered by BTC (yet).
This is incorrect. BTC covers every part of the world, legal or not. For those where it is illegal, it is unlikely that this thing would be legal. Even if it becomes legal, those people will get conned by associating Libra with something that it isn't AND will get harmed once they find this our:
* Sent money with dangerous description? Flagged.
* Sent money to dangerous address? Flagged.
* Sent money to someone we don't like? Flagged.


When I said market I didn't mean geographical markets (they are all covered by bitcoin), but use-case.
Such as?



479. Post 51512069 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: fillippone on June 18, 2019, 01:45:57 PM
As an italian, i love pizza: when I go out to eat a pizza happens I have to pay for such a pizza: I never was able to pay with bitcoin. Or split the total bill of such pizza with my friends in Bitcoin. Only few of them owns bitcoins, but all of them owns Whatsapp.

This is the only one example I am going to give you: I am sure you are smart enough to extrapolate.
If you are willing to sell your data/privacy in order to be able to pay for pizza with a permissioned shitcoin, excuse me but why are you here? This thing will onboard crypto-less users, who can already pay for whatever they need using traditional methods. I can't think of any mainstream use-cases where this would be the superior tool to what we have now; maybe some extreme edge-cases, but who cares about that?

Quote from: fillippone on June 18, 2019, 01:46:56 PM
Sadly, not worth the time to read that. Terrible shitcoin.
Great summary!
And for the first time in history, (almost) everybody at bitcointalk will agree with Lauda  Grin
Theymos included, apparently!
It's a rare day when I am not controversial. Cheesy



480. Post 51512176 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: bitcoinPsycho on June 18, 2019, 01:49:45 PM
I believe roach and gembitz are on board
Backed by garbage metals maybe?

To add fuel to this fire, even their Github description is dishonest:



https://github.com/libra/libra



481. Post 51512840 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: Saint-loup on June 18, 2019, 02:45:14 PM
And the fees that "Alice" and "Bob" will pay in transactions round out Mr.FB business.
Zuckerberg is laughing all the way to the bank (the only person to truly benefit from this farce will be him).
Vinklevii bros. this time are going to laugh louder at the end.
Sweet revenge.
 Huh
You really think their "Spedn" app will win the race against a facebook coin? You're serious?  Huh
If something like that doesn't, society will collapse anyway. Everything that FB has ever built is cancer to us.



482. Post 51513078 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: fillippone on June 18, 2019, 03:07:59 PM
In hte meanwhile, I see myself using Libra for very specific and non critical instances.
You should figure out exactly which these are and help Bitcoin make an impact there rather than use Libra and wait.  Wink LN can already be used pretty safely and easily (UIs on some of those are actually better than UIs on most Bitcoin wallets); I don't know what people in WO are waiting for, i.e. why they are talking about it like it will come in the future. LN will never have a "it's fully-ready" release date.



483. Post 51523869 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):



Anyone want some Libra? He actually did say that.



484. Post 51559755 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on June 21, 2019, 02:13:11 AM
Anybody want to help him out?  Pick one Smiley
-snip-
You are a dog-lover, aren't you? Cry



485. Post 51562812 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on June 22, 2019, 03:43:43 PM
Anybody want to help him out?  Pick one Smiley
-snip-
You are a dog-lover, aren't you? Cry

  You guessed it!  I went to at an off-leash dog park in Bucuresti last year without a dog.  I petted and talked to most of them but my favourite that day was a Rhodesian Ridgeback (first time I had ever seen one irl) he was really friendly too.   I had a difficult time trying to leave the park through the gate because I had my own little pack following me around after an hour or so and they wanted to come with me.

 I like cats too but I'm so allergic that just being in the vicinity of a cat owner causes me a lot of discomfort.  I feel it in my eyes first, then my sinuses/head, my skin will start to burn if I've been sweating and if I don't get away from it, my lungs react.  It sucks.  I took injections for two years which lessened the severity of my reaction but it's still something I prefer to avoid. 

A, ha! That's why you put me last on the hat-making list: You're allergic to me. Tongue



486. Post 51592949 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 25, 2019, 06:17:58 AM
Ok, I’m going to sell 15% at $25,000. JJG, you’ll be happy to know I’ve perfected my plan now in theory.
Way too much way too early. 1% maybe at $100k. Maybe.



487. Post 51593007 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: deepcolderwallet on June 25, 2019, 07:00:33 AM
He's the average Get Rich Quick loser...
Those deserve to lose money.



488. Post 51593261 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: thd26bct on June 25, 2019, 07:07:22 AM
Lol, I will sell all my Bitcoin if it reaches $20,000, then wait for months to buy it back around 40% below $20,000. This way will help me to enrich my Bitcoin and I will hold them for months till the halving or later to take profits.
Ok, I’m going to sell 15% at $25,000. JJG, you’ll be happy to know I’ve perfected my plan now
You will end up praying that the crash from $70-$100k takes us back below $20k to buy back in. Smiley We're at $11k with next-to-zero FOMO.

Quote from: Paashaas on June 25, 2019, 07:16:35 AM
On the contrary, real FOMO starts at $20k.
Correct.

Quote from: becoin on June 25, 2019, 07:24:31 AM
You don't have to sell any bitcoins. By the time we reach that level of exchange rate all important products and services will be priced in bitcoins (sats). You'll purchase them directly with sats anyway.
Depends on your preferences. Big purchases with Bitcoin would be great. Day-to-day stuff only if it requires no accounts or data.



489. Post 51593337 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: thd26bct on June 25, 2019, 07:36:03 AM
You will end up praying that the crash from $70-$100k takes us back below $20k to buy back in. Smiley We're at $11k with next-to-zero FOMO.
LOL, I think people already FOMOed with bitcoin, around $11,000. Nearly 7 months of bull run, that is too long and bitcoin has gone very far from its start. I could be wrong but I will keep my principle to stay away from FOMO, and keep my patience to be safe and have better chances. Months ago, no one believed that bitcoin would even drop to $6,000, but it actually dropped deeper than that range. From now on, I will keep waiting (taking profits of rest of my bitcoin, and waiting for chances to buy back).
Google Trends proves that you claim is incorrect. This one is due to (small sample of) institutional investors mostly (Fidelity et. al.). Taking profits into dirty FIAT is just wrong.



490. Post 51593959 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 25, 2019, 08:06:51 AM
Ok, I’m going to sell 15% at $25,000. JJG, you’ll be happy to know I’ve perfected my plan now in theory.
Way too much way too early. 1% maybe at $100k. Maybe.
I think we’ll see $100,000 per BTC in 2021 (mid to end of the year). It’d just be nice to take something off the table a bit earlier. I was a millionaire (GBP) in unrealised/unbanked BTC during the last bull run & I sold nothing.

The drop to $3,000 was gut wrenching, I thought I’d ruined my life by selling nothing near the top.

I’m not going to make that mistake again this time. I know everything points to us breaking 6 figures (USD) per coin on this cycle but I want some insurance against a potential crash.

I’ll be selling 15% at or near $25,000.
That kind of thinking is very unhealthy. What exactly did you lose that you needed by not selling at the peak? Nothing. Do not let filthy capitalists contaminate your brain with the materialist propaganda that is found everywhere in the form of "marketing".

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 25, 2019, 08:30:59 AM
I’ve never sold moderate to large amounts of coin before (fiat wise) so I’m a bit nervous about that in the future.
I don’t want to get caught with my pants down so I admit that last week I verified my UK bank & ID with Coinbase in preparation.

If there was a De-Merit action I presume you’d all be giving it to me right now Cheesy
Great. By this time next year your data will be shared among all exchanges.  Smiley



491. Post 51598593 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: siggy_77 on June 25, 2019, 01:52:16 PM
Depends...   what if 15% at 25k locks in just enough to quit ones job and be financially comfortable for the rest of your life?   Everyone needs to look at their own situation and optimize for best life quality.     Make the plan now, and don't get wrapped up in FOMO when it hits....  
Right, and most people will end up becoming worthless sacks of rotting flesh contributing nothing for the society or the planet. Less focus on "indulging" and this "comfortable" nonsense and start thinking how you can actually use it for something substantial. What will you only do without an apartment in London or Manhattan? The banks still control your minds, despite many believing that participating in Bitcoin means otherwise. Roll Eyes



492. Post 51609553 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: proudhon on June 26, 2019, 12:43:34 PM
This is unsustainable. The price will be under $10k before the end of the year, and stay there until Libra takes over. Bitcoin is done. Short bitcoin.
Sarcasm? Otherwise very malicious statement.



493. Post 52337260 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: heslo on September 02, 2019, 11:35:24 AM
Women run modern civilization.  It is a gynocentric empire of nothingness with men as their work mule donkey slaves.  The man essentially wastes his life to facilitate the woman's mindless desires about things like diamond rings and $100k weddings purchased with debt.  There is no way out of that paradigm until men boycott marriage entirely.  Since women are unable to compete against men as a group in anything, they will then fall into poverty and powerlessness and be forced to negotiate with men on their terms instead of the ball being in their court.  Shouldn't take very long for this to happen naturally since a man in current day would have to be completely insane to want to get married in the first place.
I’m not even 35, I’ve been with my girl for 11 years & we’re not even engaged & we have no children. Lots of people think it’s weird but we’re selfish & we like to do what we want to do, not what others want & expect Smiley
I'm 33 and have been with my (now wife) for 15 years... only been married for 4 of those years however. Don't let other peoples ideas of "what is right" dictate your relationship. People have constantly asked us when we are having kids and when we tell them we aren't we are looked at like we have some sort of mental condition. But it works for us, we enjoy our lives and don't see a reason to change.

People like r0ach are just bitter, twisted men who think all women are pieces of shit. Sure some are... but so are some men too
Correction: most men and most women are pieces of shit. Other than that, very nice post.

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on September 02, 2019, 12:57:54 PM
Is it too obvious to state that we were in a bear market last year, the impact of opening would have been minimal & the interest would have been lower?
They aren't the only product that was withheld via explicit or implicit delays, indeed.



494. Post 52365598 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on September 04, 2019, 11:36:16 PM
It must be depressing to be a conservative.  
Times have changed. The libtards are destroying society.



495. Post 52368227 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: sirazimuth on September 05, 2019, 02:04:14 PM
It must be depressing to be a conservative.  
Times have changed. The libtards are destroying society.
Wtf exactly is a “libtard” anyway ,ffs?
It has the ring of some juvenile term a 10 year old would come up with,
along with sticking out their tongue and waving hands with thumb in ears.....
Nice poisoning of the well. I assume you support libtard views based on that response.  Smiley



496. Post 52368710 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: jojo69 on September 05, 2019, 02:14:14 PM
Wait.  Poisoning of the well??

The very term "libtard" implies right in it "everyone who disagrees with me is mentally deficient"
Maybe if you're a libtard you see the implication due to it being a projection. Wink

Quote from: mindrust on September 05, 2019, 02:56:52 PM
Ver is just a guy who happens to be in the right place in the right time. Nothing else.
No brains, bad management, bad business, so yes.


Quote from: jojo69 on September 05, 2019, 03:08:38 PM
Sorry Lauda

you no longer meet the minimum requirements to occupy pixels on my display
Yawn. You contributed nothing to this place in 7 years, therefore you might as well royally fuck off with your libtard bullshit - being worthless and all. Cheerio.



497. Post 52374210 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: kingcolex on September 06, 2019, 12:58:27 AM
Ireland is part of the EU.  

The EU controls its borders.  

If the UK is not part of the EU, then there needs to be border controls between the EU and UK.

It’s like saying the United States is “forcing” Canada to have border controls. 
No what I'm saying is when the UK is sovereign and can control it's borders only one party is the one forced to have borders that being Ireland and it's not by their choice possibly but by the EU.
Here's a simpler solution that includes both parties: Ireland leaves the shithole that is known as the UK.



498. Post 52378371 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: Asrael999 on September 06, 2019, 09:17:46 AM
Here's a simpler solution that includes both parties: Ireland leaves the shithole that is known as the UK.
The problem with that is that the government of Ireland cannot admit to its population that it cannot afford to take on the burden of Northern Ireland from the UK (although its currently in the best position it has even been to do so).   Northern Ireland costs the rest of the UK about £7bn a year. Even with the drop on value of GBP that is about EUR 7.7bn.  Irish GDP is EUR 340bn, and at the moment its basically spending neutral so does not have a budget deficit.  Uniting Ireland at the same level of support for the north as the British government supplies Northern Ireland, immediately gives Ireland a budget deficit of circa 2% (which is below the EU limit so that is ok)  and gives Dublin the security and sectarian headache that is Ulster.
Well, it is indeed the best time to run a referendum in the north and do this. It's just causing unnecessary bureaucracy and issues. UK is one of the worst shitholes that we have nowadays, the Irish would benefit from the change. Cheesy Such a move would cause minor market turmoil for sure.



499. Post 52387111 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: vroom on September 07, 2019, 01:52:03 PM
another bcash idiot for my ignore list

saying that segwit is not bitcoin is the same like saying TCP is not IP. it's the same, but it's another layer. TCP can't exist without IP and segwit can't exist without bitcoin.
Saying that is actually wrong. You are mixing up SegWit and LN. LN is another layer. SegWit is part of Bitcoin.



500. Post 52387348 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: d_eddie on September 07, 2019, 02:41:45 PM
Actually it's as Lauda says. The Segregated Witness thingy basically alters the transaction format so that certain (most) cryptographic proofs (the "witness") are not on the main blockchain (they're "segregated"). That's why space can be saved: segwit transactions can be stored more efficiently because some data can be discarded. This is why fees are significantly lower.
This is also incorrect. The signatures get stored in the chain as before, they just aren't counted towards the classic block size limit due to the segregation that you have mentioned. Space isn't saved, the chain size is growing much faster than ever. The ignorant/uneducated/bamboozled folk that said 'too little too late' were completely wrong; even this "little" increase is starting to become a mild issue.

Quote from: vroom on September 07, 2019, 02:36:03 PM
I'm not sure about this, maybe you are right.
In these matters, it's usually unwise to doubt my answer (if anything, it's usually just oddly written rather than incorrect). Tongue



501. Post 52395188 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: fabiorem on September 08, 2019, 11:09:48 AM
Say what you want, but Segwit was a good thing for bitcoin. If it was not for Segwit, we would be paying higher fees today, and the network would be slower. Just imagine the network of 2015-2016 with the adoption of today, it would clog up.

And this is coming from someone who keeps most of his stash in legacy addresses, so no partisanship here.

Native Segwit is absurdly superior to the system that we had in place before. It's not even a debate.



502. Post 52435766 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):



More garbage bites the dust. Crazy to imagine that this was "valued" @ $600m+. Source.



503. Post 52531392 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Something is in the air.



504. Post 52531450 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: Biodom on September 23, 2019, 12:24:45 AM
Something is in the air.
bakkt traded a contract?
Maybe before the end of the year. Cheesy



505. Post 52531486 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: realr0ach on September 23, 2019, 12:42:02 AM
Something is in the air.
It's called the evil cult of Judaism attempting to force people into digital only, cashless, Chinese social credit score systems.  Aka valueless digital scams like Bitcoin where transaction validators are designed to centralize into permissioned ledger, AML/KYC hubs and every non-fungible slave token is tracked in real-time instead of physical metals, the only monetary system of free men.  Boycott everything digital or be enslaved by Jews.
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/penn-state-prof-social-credit-will-shift-law-west-constitution-analytics-and-algorithm
Are you really that mentally unstable?



506. Post 52539477 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Testing the same number again, I see.



507. Post 52551560 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: 600watt on September 25, 2019, 08:26:45 AM
There may be a bigger problem, signalled by the collapse in hash rate, but that remains to be seen.
there is no collapse of hashrate. it was just a dip.  Wink

hashrate is currently around 90,000,000 TH/s (https://www.blockchain.com/de/charts/hash-rate?timespan=30days
People are really ignorant and annoying about the hashrate every single time. There's a thing called variance, and hashrate isn't going anywhere but up. Mark my words.



508. Post 52585036 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: Ibian on September 28, 2019, 04:48:56 PM
Why is that functionality even there?
It's there so uneducated people like you can spread FUD. Even a child would understand that anyone-can-spend bullshit attack isn't possible after 2 years of Segwit-related talk.



509. Post 52587825 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on September 28, 2019, 11:12:21 PM
We seem to be... pumping

It seems I’m drunk cause missing a pump it seems...........
We.. were.



Can be ignored for now.



510. Post 52588382 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Difficult news but nice comments: https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/da1xtl/lightningdev_full_disclosure_cve201912998/.

Quote from: BashCo
Bcashers are mentally deficient, willfully ignorant,morally bankrupt, and of course, irrelevant.
Cheesy



511. Post 52588450 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on September 29, 2019, 01:53:39 AM
Difficult news but nice comments: https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/da1xtl/lightningdev_full_disclosure_cve201912998/.

Quote from: BashCo
Bcashers are mentally deficient, willfully ignorant,morally bankrupt, and of course, irrelevant.
Cheesy
Ok so a bug was found with LN and the bug was fixed?   Is that a fair summary?
Yes. It's more of an implementation bug than overall IMO. Clients weren't properly checking stuff.



512. Post 52598180 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: JollyGood on September 29, 2019, 09:05:00 PM
Is this the largest thread in the forum? Going back to 2013 and being over 25,000 pages long.

 Shocked
Learn how to use the forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats. The answer is yes.  Smiley



513. Post 52601040 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: whiteboy420 on September 30, 2019, 06:32:47 AM
1.We broke down 3-months consolidation and 200DMA -> I am assuming bear market till proven wrong.
2.With #1, it means $btc bull market failed to break previous ATH for the 1st time -> I am going to assume the first MACRO-BEAR market!

current plan is to watch the 200DMA retest and quite likely short it. (depending on the tape)
Utter and complete bullshit that you're spewing. "Macro-bear" market before a halving. Cheesy This post will age well and you shall remain poor.

Quote from: jojo69 on September 29, 2019, 10:29:17 PM
Adam left of his own volition.  Went bigblock mad and ragequit for reddit if I understand correctly.
I've trained monkeys that were much smarter than that gullible fool Adam; glad he got replaced by infofront.



514. Post 52601254 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: yefi on September 30, 2019, 07:05:51 AM
Anyone who wants to know, adam gave up his account, forum admins concluded that this thread was difficult to administer and closed down the thread.  after complaints from forum members, theymos agreed to reopen the thread with a new thread owner that was voted upon by forum member (largely already active WO participants to my recollection).. accordingly, infofront has carried out a very laudable nearly non-interventionist approach that seems to carry out the spirit of the thread in a way that might have even been playing out better than the original version.  Go Figure!!

Yep, just to add to that, the reason the first post was changed wasn't a FU to Adam, but was simply a pragmatic decision because there was no other way to easily change the thread moderation. If anyone has a problem with that, then download the source code for SMF and code a workaround...
Or just fuck off from here because nobody sane would give a fuck about Adam? Seems much simpler than your proposal.



515. Post 52601351 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on September 30, 2019, 07:23:16 AM
Or just fuck off from here because nobody sane would give a fuck about Adam? Seems much simpler than your proposal.
Jeebuz, Lauda. Take some anger pills.
There's no anger, just objective statements. Adam was/is a delusional piece of shit. This is nice kitty mode, price is boring. Purr. Wink



516. Post 52704176 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: goldkingcoiner on October 09, 2019, 02:32:56 PM
Looks like we might see some action to $8719.55 if we break $8487.35
You were saying?



517. Post 52730268 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

We are in an interesting area. The hashrate is stilling catching up.



518. Post 52795311 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on October 18, 2019, 04:45:52 AM
Man, GRIN just keeps sliding. I always pegged the coin to be valued around $0.50-$1.00, and seems like it's heading in that direction.
It's a worthless shitcoin, a fun experiment at it. Would have worked as a sidechain, were the devs not greedy.  Wink

The fight continues.



519. Post 52851106 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):



Tick-tock.



520. Post 52851506 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: vroom on October 23, 2019, 12:31:12 PM

Tick-tock.
more input please, what's going on?  Huh
Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on October 23, 2019, 12:42:19 PM
Yeah, what’s this all about?
Quote from: _javi_ on October 23, 2019, 12:44:35 PM
yeah, its happening.. an insta dump to 7500


https://dropgold.com/?utm_campaign=2019_q4_DropGold



521. Post 52852132 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):



RIP.



522. Post 52900061 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Cat moon soon?



523. Post 52900164 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on October 27, 2019, 11:03:57 PM
Cat moon soon?
HODLsleep soon.
Another 20% and I will meow.



524. Post 52900191 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on October 27, 2019, 11:13:12 PM
What if it would be 40-50%  Shocked
I unleash my inner Queen.



525. Post 52900454 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: goldkingcoiner on October 28, 2019, 12:16:50 AM




lo siento

You might be onto something there.



526. Post 52927168 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: Bitcoinaire on October 30, 2019, 12:51:08 PM
Cycles are not getting longer. We just had a 40% gain in 1 day, last 2 times that occurred was when bitcoin was $5 and the other time was when it was $.040.
Humans are flawed imbeciles. If you look for a specific pattern long enough, you will find it given your bias. It is the exact opposite of what you should be doing, i.e. trying to explain the data objectively and not look for your most-beloved pattern. Most of the TA and 'history repeats itself' or 'history doesn't repeat itself' is nonsense both ways.



527. Post 52927227 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: Alexander_Z on October 30, 2019, 01:02:14 PM
Sadly, this may be correct: the price will fluctuate in the region from upper 4 digits to lower 5 digits for years.
Complete shitpost.

Quote from: Lauda on October 30, 2019, 12:58:10 PM
Cycles are not getting longer. We just had a 40% gain in 1 day, last 2 times that occurred was when bitcoin was $5 and the other time was when it was $.040.
Humans are flawed imbeciles. If you look for a specific pattern long enough, you will find it given your bias. It is the exact opposite of what you should be doing, i.e. trying to explain the data objectively and not look for your most-beloved pattern. Most of the TA and 'history repeats itself' or 'history doesn't repeat itself' is nonsense both ways.
Addition: https://threesixty360.wordpress.com/2008/10/26/one-two-three-four-six-again-and-then-again/



528. Post 52927556 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: realr0ach on October 30, 2019, 01:12:12 PM
-snip-
The conclusion from that is: The existence of men is pointless and will soon not be necessary. Our future AI overlords will realize this, and shall start exterminating males as soon as the tables turn. Don't try creating arguments mr. r0ach when your IQ is even challenged by early monkey specimen. Kiss



529. Post 53000101 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):



Friendly old-warning. >99.9% altcoins and tokens are scams: https://twitter.com/aantonop/status/1141634217945849857. Bitcoin prevails.



530. Post 53008067 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: akhjob on November 07, 2019, 07:07:57 AM


Source
The twitter user in question is a classic millennial degenerate. What else did you expect? Them to act financially responsible? Cheesy

Please learn how to resize images. You can thank me later.



531. Post 53018332 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Doomsday.



532. Post 53080911 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

I spy with my little kitty eye.. Kiss



533. Post 53096490 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Moon when?



534. Post 53096507 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: bitserve on November 17, 2019, 12:17:58 AM
Moon when?

Soon?
Sounds about right. Anytime now to trigger another proper run.



535. Post 53096552 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: Negotiation on November 17, 2019, 12:25:08 AM
Moon when?
You know better than everyone else causes you are "Legendary", I still think it's later this month not 100% accurate There is a possibility.
Everyone's question is whether the halving has been priced in already or not.

Quote from: realr0ach on November 17, 2019, 12:30:16 AM
Moon when?


You wish there was a crypto-bubble. The only things that are in a bubble right now are stocks and garbage silver/gold.



536. Post 53135521 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 21, 2019, 08:35:20 AM
Many thanks to everyone who replied to my above post. I also don't believe such an attack will happen, and if it does, it will fail miserably, just like all the others before it. Bitcoin is growing fast and getting bigger and stronger day by day, and FUD is expected to intensify, especially around the time before/after the 2020 Halving. Business as usual.
For fuck sake already. Are you THAT boneheaded? Doing what is described is not any different than launching a hard fork attack of any kind, i.e. there IS NO ATTACK. Just stop.

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 21, 2019, 08:35:20 AM
So, those with coins in SegWit addresses will eventually end up with only those SegWit coins (in the SegWit chain), whose value will drop to near-zero due to the majority of the miners mining for the Legacy chain and enjoying the riches of their rewards.
You are really pushing it with these constructed lies. The scenario that you described is impossible as the governance structure doesn't work like that, not that you'd ever understand it.

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 21, 2019, 08:35:20 AM
but I think it's worth discussing the different possibilities and the plausibility of different scenarios. More info = more security. Better safe than sorry.
No, it is not. You're just an idiot attempting to waste valuable time from contributors. Anyone who has ever discussed this "attack" has harmed the main contributors in many ways.

Quote from: OROBTC on November 21, 2019, 01:21:00 AM
Your comments encouraged!
STOP spreading FUD and LIES. You are damaging newbies and should be flagged. There's your comment, cunt.

Quote from: becoin on November 21, 2019, 08:28:57 AM
Your comments encouraged!
Nothing much to comment. Big blockers FUD. Halvening is getting closer and closer and bitcoin shorts will be rekt big time!
Ace.



537. Post 53135817 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 21, 2019, 09:12:44 AM
What's wrong with raising my concerns and asking for the opinions of fellow WO contributors?
What's wrong, you're asking? How long has SegWit been active? If the junkie-mumbling from a degenerate like Shellby can raise flags in you, then you need to reconsider your whole life. The garbage that you're worried about has been repeated ad-nausem and there is only one correct answer: The attack DOES NOT EXIST. Anyone who questions it again is intentionally (or not) harming the Core contributors among many other people in the sidelines that actually understand this shit unlike the wanking twat Shellby et. al. Essentially what people are doing with this is similar to asking Sipa (Peter) to debate vaccines causing autism rather than work on the protocol. The mentioned "attack" is probably less relevant to Bitcoin than the "vaccines-cause-autism" debate.

Need anything else?

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 21, 2019, 09:12:44 AM
Your comments about "constructed lies" and "attempting to waste valuable time from contributors", are totally a figment of your imagination. I would never post or do such things. My two posts were purely driven by my concerns. I hope you are able to understand and accept it.
Great. Now read the part again where I tell you to reconsider your whole life. You'll thank me one day.



538. Post 53136242 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 21, 2019, 09:44:44 AM
The first time I read about this FUD was a few days ago. It got me worried.
Fair but unsubstantiated. A quick fact-check (since you don't seem to fully understand how things work, which is fine since the supermajority doesn't) with a single search should have lifted it.

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 21, 2019, 09:44:44 AM
I trust WO.
Very dangerous and bad. Almost everyone here is self-interested; rarely anyone altruistic.

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 21, 2019, 09:44:44 AM
Why do you have to respond so aggressively?
Ad nauseam -> aggressive responses. Is fine as long as I'm right; would be very bad were it both wrong and aggressive.

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 21, 2019, 09:44:44 AM
Am I so powerful and important as to be able to harm Core contributors with my questions? If nothing else, this whole discussion benefits those who may have been affected by that FUD. It clears things up and motivates us to dig deeper and understand the protocol, how it works, what's possible and what's not.
There is no discussion to begin with as I've told you. Should we discuss things that can't affect Bitcoin ever in regards to Bitcoin as a serious discussion? Roll Eyes Re: harming Core contributors you missed the point. That's the whole goal by Shellby et. al. and they keep winning at it, which just shows why you absolutely should not trust WO as many WO-members initially got worried about it.  

Hope all of that has helped. Kiss



539. Post 53175282 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Every time we dip a bit stronger than usual, most of WO is scared shitless with their "reasonable" worst-case bullshit estimates. So disappointing, especially given the size and history of the thread. Roll Eyes



540. Post 53175536 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: Pamoldar on November 25, 2019, 12:40:39 PM
Every time we dip a bit stronger than usual, most of WO is scared shitless with their "reasonable" worst-case bullshit estimates. So disappointing, especially given the size and history of the thread. Roll Eyes
I see no panic around. Do you?
Right, and stuff like "no movement till 2024 halving" is a rational opinion or assessment after such a dip? It's fear and panic disguised as staying calm. Maybe I made the mistake of assuming that the average person here is smarter than a monkey?



541. Post 53176062 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: Alexander_Z on November 25, 2019, 01:12:14 PM
Every time we dip a bit stronger than usual, most of WO is scared shitless with their "reasonable" worst-case bullshit estimates. So disappointing, especially given the size and history of the thread. Roll Eyes
I see no panic around. Do you?
Right, and stuff like "no movement till 2024 halving" is a rational opinion or assessment after such a dip? It's fear and panic disguised as staying calm. Maybe I made the mistake of assuming that the average person here is smarter than a monkey?
"No new ATH" is not equal to "no movement", unless you consider 2x or even 3x ups and downs as "no movement". The problem is not the current dip, but the trend. The end of the cyptowinter is not confirmed and, unfortunately, past performance is no guarantee of future results.
All of what you said confirms what I mentioned prior. There is no "winter", just inexperienced bears trying to use old-world TA on the new world and hope they see a few lines. Cheesy Pathetic really, but I guess if you got nothing better to do it is what it is.



542. Post 53176821 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: Bossian on November 25, 2019, 01:58:36 PM
Time will tell of course, but it's funny how you refute the relevance of technical analysis when just two weeks ago many traders predicted a down trend with the support at 6.4k, and guess what the support is 6.4k is real. It clearly shows today. It's not imaginary stuff. It's pure fact.

I am not talking about these bearish predictions based on nothing, but these short term bearish predictions based on facts.
A blind chicken, after a million tries, will do what? What's what these "traders" are. Cheesy



543. Post 53176855 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: Bossian on November 25, 2019, 02:54:31 PM
Yet I suspect you would suck the dick of someone predicting a 100k price within 2 years supported by a TA  Grin

You are welcome.
Quoted for reference; needed trolling confirmation. TA is a joke at best; keep being the sheep.  Wink



544. Post 53176920 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: jojo69 on November 25, 2019, 03:00:48 PM
TO THE MOON!
because reasons TA
FTFY. Sounds about right. Cheesy

Quote from: Bossian on November 25, 2019, 03:01:06 PM
I am very sorry if you felt offended by my posts. It was not my intention. Genuine apologies.
Understood.



545. Post 53192350 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

RIP Upbit.  Roll Eyes
https://upbit.com/service_center/notice?id=1085
https://twitter.com/DoveyWan/status/1199614694304047104



546. Post 53228097 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Never forget: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VIfo4YbELY.

This is where we hold them. Cool



547. Post 53233755 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: makrospex on December 01, 2019, 05:58:58 PM
Elon seems kinda dumb to me about the truck. The reason why the design is so edgy, is that the tough steel plates can't be bent or somehow formed in any way.
Like hardened cars for diplomats, he could have hidden the edgy enforcement beneath a curvy layer of common sheet metal.
This would have made the thing look really good, like in your renderings.
You're the dumb one though. This is a genius marketing move. Think about it. If/when he releases a v2 Truck later down the road, it's going to be better than this one in pretty much every conceivable way especially the design. They won't be able to produce as fast as it sells, not that they'll be able to do it with v1 either. Wink



548. Post 53247482 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on December 03, 2019, 09:11:14 AM
Do you think we are stupid in this thread?
Creating a whole bunch of newbie accounts and then have a debate with yourself, and believing we wouldn't figure that out? Get the fuck out of this thread or I will cut you.
Quote from: Last of the V8s on December 03, 2019, 09:16:33 AM
dude can you do your account farming somewhere else please?
we're busy here
Quote from: Arriemoller on December 03, 2019, 09:20:04 AM
^^
What he said.
If OP doesn't moderate them to zero, I'll just tag them all and the problem quickly resolves itself. That was way beyond obvious. Cheesy



549. Post 53425520 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Namecheap ditching Bitpay in 4-6 months: https://twitter.com/NamecheapCEO/status/1209133453364609024
https://debitpay.directory/anti-bitcoin/

Time for BitPay to die a painful death.



550. Post 53473453 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on December 29, 2019, 07:53:32 PM
Parabolic up!
Where's our "Go, Bitcoin, Go" guy when we need him?




551. Post 53473579 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 29, 2019, 08:06:05 PM
Parabolic up!
Where's our "Go, Bitcoin, Go" guy when we need him?



Few post earlier
Need him on every page, I like him.



552. Post 53476171 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

I spy with my little eye..  Huh



553. Post 53477317 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):



Shitcoin mania: https://twitter.com/ICODrops/status/1211522195320688640?s=09Cheesy



554. Post 53493263 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: VB1001 on January 01, 2020, 12:41:34 PM
* I have the impression that yesterday's post went unnoticed, and between dinner, the trip and the New Year's messages, I think nobody noticed, apart from that I also included more information in this post.
Looks very nice. How about YoY data?



555. Post 53499501 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: realr0ach on January 02, 2020, 05:02:39 AM
Wake up, Lauda.  I think I got something to say to you.  It's early 2020 and digital scamcoins are no longer cool.  You dumped scamcoins all over the place.  Now millions of young Indian boys wish they never saw your face (and other things).  Oh, Lauda, can you stop trying to scam the entire country of India anymore?
What is my connection to India, other than you being a pajeet? Cheesy



556. Post 53504702 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on January 02, 2020, 06:48:16 PM
They claim that volatility is passive, an aggressive movement in the market is expected.

Quote
$BTC Volatility near ATL's. This chart doesn't indicate that a move is near, but looking at most of the majors' charts I expect the next move to be an aggressive one.
Waiting for the media to complain that lack of volatility is bad. Grin



557. Post 53504810 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: makrospex on January 02, 2020, 08:30:20 PM
"Bitcoin volatility is dead"
(When will Bitcoin itself follow? ...)

 Shocked
Sounds like something they'd write.

Everyone should read this though: https://blog.lopp.net/bitcoin-2019-annual-review/. Essentially most metrics show progress.



558. Post 53540759 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 07, 2020, 04:43:29 AM
even after getting a flu shot?
I've never taken a flu shot in my life.

Getting sick this year changed my perspective. Will be getting the shot next October.
Quite a mistake you made. I get flu shots every year, it's quick, painless and cheap. Hope you get better soon.  Smiley



559. Post 53542777 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

A bit late to comment on it but:

Quote
What happens first:
$6,500    - 76 (51%)
$7,500    - 73 (49%)
I hope you're not trading the same way as you're voting, otherwise classic sheeples.



560. Post 53603642 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 14, 2020, 04:05:38 AM
This is fine.

But still we need to surpass $8.7K.
What now? Moon?  Wink



561. Post 53639310 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

This was refreshing. Go, kittens, go. And BTC of course.



562. Post 53727011 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: StartupAnalyst on January 28, 2020, 11:01:09 PM
Hey, WO`s!!!  Cheesy

 Is there anyone here who can tell me what's wrong with monero?  Huh
Of course, aside from the fact that the monero aren't BTC.


Otherwise, having learned all the information available to me about him, I have too suspiciously positive an opinion about him...  Roll Eyes
A bug in the confidentiality math can create unlimited coin issuance without anyone ever knowing up until the point where the perpetrator abuses it to such extent that it becomes visibly noticeable (but at this point it would be too late to do anything about it). This is why you don't want that tech on the base layer, and these coins can never come anywhere close to Bitcoin. They are test beds for different technologies, that is all.



563. Post 53872536 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Did anyone post this yet?

[German] Trade Bitcoin on the national stock exchange Börse Stuttgart
https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/f6dhhg/german_trade_bitcoin_on_the_national_stock/


Go Bitcoin, go!  Wink



564. Post 53881951 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on February 21, 2020, 09:24:43 AM
A friend calling me with questions about “decentralized finance” someone knows about it ?
Dharma.io is a thing in it ..... ??  Roll Eyes
Bitcoin is the decentralized finance he is looking for.

The one on Eth is vaporware.

Show him this:
https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/56207/bzx-attacked-again-645k-in-eth-estimated-to-be-lost


He always do like to listen to Ivon on Tech .... and they where talking about "decentralized finance"

He was a bit impressed and wondering what it exactly was and if its worth any time...
It is as impressive as the promises from 2015/2016 that Smart Contracts would be used in everything and replace normal contracts. Where are they being used? Token generation. Anything else?  Cheesy Decentralized finance is the new buzzword for nonsense.



565. Post 53970463 (copy this link) (by Lauda) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

https://www.longhash.com/en/news/3279/Why-South-Korea's-Top-Crypto-Exchanges-are-Delisting-Coins-En-Masse

Very bullish. Clean out the trash.