All posts made by billyjoeallen in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 3553205 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: mccorvic on November 11, 2013, 10:50:40 PM
I had my heart set on a lot more excitement from Gox when it came back up.  Of course, Gox has left me disappointed. I don't know what I was expecting.

Gox is not executing any of my orders, even now. I have a 1 BTC test buy in and...nothing. UPDATE Just fell through my bid price and...still nothing.



2. Post 3553244 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: aqrulesms on November 11, 2013, 10:56:51 PM
Huh

I was expecting a huge drop down when Gox came back up, instead we have a slow lingering decrease in price instead.

I want those cheap coins faster.

me too! my order still hasn't been filled. anyone else still not able to trade?



3. Post 3553400 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: CoinArtist on November 11, 2013, 11:18:25 PM
So Gox still not working properly?

Just placed a market order that filled. Limit order still nuttin.



4. Post 4328230 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

What happened to the usual weekend dip? I tried to day trade it and now I'm stuck in worthless depreciating fiat. Good thing it was only one coin, one I bought for $17.00  ;-)



5. Post 4328841 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: notme on January 05, 2014, 05:04:16 PM
What happened to the usual weekend dip? I tried to day trade it and now I'm stuck in worthless depreciating fiat. Good thing it was only one coin, one I bought for $17.00  ;-)

You've been around long enough that you should know not to do that unless we have been trending down for the week already.  In other cases it is too risky precisely because people do it anyway.  Bulls know this and will ramp it on the weekends when they have control.

I guess I'm too much of a contrarian. I bought that coin on the way down from $31 in 2011 (along with a few others). I was selling the whole ramp up from $350 to $1200 and buying back on the way down. My biggest mistake was taking my profits in fiat instead of BTC. Stupid dollars. What am I supposed to do with those? Wipe my butt?



6. Post 4359905 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: TERA on January 07, 2014, 05:49:48 AM
My hunch is that we will burst through the ath in a few days. And relax around the 1500 mark (gox price). Next bubble pop talk will start around 2k+ and the actual pop doesn't occur until 4k.

Note: I am usually wrong, APART from when I have actually put my money where my mouth is. I haven't lost by actually trading before.
You're betting on a new ATH after only a month-long correction? How do you figure that? This has never happened in bitcoin. Even the smallest corrections from very early on were at least 2 months and the average correction is 6 months.

We've never had a double top in bitcoin either. Still, if you think the intervals between rallies is roughly correlated with the proportional size of the rally, then 3 months is what I put the next ATH at. Yet, and I know this sounds crazy, what if the double top was just a bear trap and the real rally is just getting started? The FED and the fractional reserve system is creating about 800 billion $/month and some of that will find it's way into bitcoin. and that's just the U.S.- every central bank is printing like mad now. Much less than 1% of that new (counterfeit) fiat would double the BTC market cap in one month.




7. Post 4360046 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: medialab101 on January 07, 2014, 06:12:49 AM
That reason would be that MT Gox is a black hole that does not pay its customers out (depending where you live, anyway).

If you live in Japan, wouldn't you be rich?  Grin

I live in Japan and just got "trusted" status with Gox. It has been a very slow process (started 2 months ago). So the first day I have it I'm like 'weeeeeeee, let's start arbing...' Only to find out when I log in that my daily withdrawal limit has not changed. Still stuck at $1,000 a day. So anyways, I tried to withdraw $1,000 into my Japanese USD account to test it; however, the withdrawal has been mysteriously cancelled twice now with no explanation. Still waiting for answers. /sadface

Keep me posted on this. I thought the MTGOX black hole was just for us yanks. How does that place still operate? Been waiting on my wire xfer since Nov 11. got an email a week ago from tech support telling me they don't even have an ETA for it yet. Magical Tux is letting a billion dollar opportunity bleed market share like a hemophiliac gargling razorblades.



8. Post 4360202 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

I really don't understand the complaints about market manipulation. Price artificially low? buy. Price will always return to fair market value eventually. Price artificially high? sell or sell short. It's really hard to manipulate prices on a dozen exchanges at once.  It's more likely some pussy losing his nerve or just looking to buy back in lower and increase his holdings. I will tell you this: I made it through two crashes without selling a single bitcoin and this time if it crashes again, I'm buying more. follow the trend and you fall off the cliff with the rest of the lemmings. and you make BTC more volatile and less useful. I bet against the trend and profit from reducing volatility.



9. Post 4360483 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: MikeH on January 07, 2014, 06:51:08 AM
I really don't understand the complaints about market manipulation. Price artificially low? buy. Price will always return to fair market value eventually.

like gold and silver?  would love to see that hit fair market value, though I think we need ETF's to drive btc price to see the same level of manipulation.


exactly like gold and silver. they will hit market value, but probably never again as the basis for the world's reserve currency. I think of gold as analog bitcoin now.



10. Post 4360579 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on January 07, 2014, 06:59:06 AM
BTW I am really curious about Mtgox, I see allot of people selling there, and most of the time huge sells appears and I still wonder how do they get their money off the exchange? I mean why does anyone still sell there ? or maybe there is a premium club of members that still can get money in/out fast than others ?

gox has a lower volume than Stamp yet a deeper book order comparing to Bitstamp, in my experience Bitstamp is the only exchange where I can get money in/out in a matter of a couple of days, if I send early enough during the day and having a bit of luck my deposits/withdrawals were credited the same day sometimes...

That's a damn good question. haha

There is a tier 3 of verification which allows a withdrawal up to $1 million Ithink. And since they're valuable customers I'm sure they have more priority then the $75 withdrawal.

I know about people who are stuck with $100K withdrawal for months now, so I doubt it, although the person I know was never a trader, so for sure he is not a member of any premium club, he was just a miner who mined early enough and held to the coins, I don't know waht others think, but the only case when I sold bitcoins was when I needed the cash for something and after march 2013 it was no option for me to sell at gox, even though I always used bitstamp because I live in Slovenia and things go faster... but just think about it, when you sell at today's price and than wait 4-5 months just to maybe and I insist on "maybe" get that money when Bitcoin will be worth allot more by then....I mean who does that really ? and why?


I am not jumping on accusations, But I want to ask people here if they still trade at gox? how many of you here really use gox ? and why ? mtgox data might be made up the same as huboi or okcoin... who knows... it doesn't make any sense...

I still trade there. I'm hoping to withdraw from Gox in small amounts eventually. I don't care if it takes 1-2 months as long as I get them. Then redeposting in another exchange. I don't want to take the 20-30% loss switching to other exchanges by withdrawing in BTC.

Edit: My God the Mtgox fee really sucks compared to Bitstamp.

ummm, it's 2 to 3 months and losing 30% buy transferring your coins to another exchange or losing 30% buy having your money stuck in depreciating fiat instead of BTC is the same loss. That's assuming you EVER get the funds, something I'm starting to doubt. 30% is actually a low side loss when you consider that on average bitcoin appreciate >1000%/year.



11. Post 4361177 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on January 07, 2014, 07:45:37 AM
BTW I am really curious about Mtgox, I see allot of people selling there, and most of the time huge sells appears and I still wonder how do they get their money off the exchange? I mean why does anyone still sell there ? or maybe there is a premium club of members that still can get money in/out fast than others ?

gox has a lower volume than Stamp yet a deeper book order comparing to Bitstamp, in my experience Bitstamp is the only exchange where I can get money in/out in a matter of a couple of days, if I send early enough during the day and having a bit of luck my deposits/withdrawals were credited the same day sometimes...

That's a damn good question. haha

There is a tier 3 of verification which allows a withdrawal up to $1 million Ithink. And since they're valuable customers I'm sure they have more priority then the $75 withdrawal.

I know about people who are stuck with $100K withdrawal for months now, so I doubt it, although the person I know was never a trader, so for sure he is not a member of any premium club, he was just a miner who mined early enough and held to the coins, I don't know waht others think, but the only case when I sold bitcoins was when I needed the cash for something and after march 2013 it was no option for me to sell at gox, even though I always used bitstamp because I live in Slovenia and things go faster... but just think about it, when you sell at today's price and than wait 4-5 months just to maybe and I insist on "maybe" get that money when Bitcoin will be worth allot more by then....I mean who does that really ? and why?


I am not jumping on accusations, But I want to ask people here if they still trade at gox? how many of you here really use gox ? and why ? mtgox data might be made up the same as huboi or okcoin... who knows... it doesn't make any sense...

I still trade there. I'm hoping to withdraw from Gox in small amounts eventually. I don't care if it takes 1-2 months as long as I get them. Then redeposting in another exchange. I don't want to take the 20-30% loss switching to other exchanges by withdrawing in BTC.

Edit: My God the Mtgox fee really sucks compared to Bitstamp.

ummm, it's 2 to 3 months and losing 30% buy transferring your coins to another exchange or losing 30% buy having your money stuck in depreciating fiat instead of BTC is the same loss. That's assuming you EVER get the funds, something I'm starting to doubt. 30% is actually a low side loss when you consider that on average bitcoin appreciate >1000%/year.

When I was just starting BTC, I was all or nothing. But now I rarely go 100% into BTC. Admittedly I made a few mistakes by not. But this way I can sleep at night. Also I know this is psychological, but I still like being on the exchange with the highest USD so when we do hit the Mtgox ATH I can see it and be part of it! Rather then "Congrats to those guys on Mtgox, they hit the ATH."

Yeah, like mental illnesses are psychological. Bragging rights more important than actually getting your money? Hell, I've hit the ATH on Trade Hill, Bitoption, Bitmarket.eu and...what? they don't exist anymore? WooHOO! I had the most BTC there when they disappeared! Yeah for me!!!!!!! I win, right?



12. Post 4362874 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: fotosonics on January 07, 2014, 09:44:36 AM
I am about to buy 7 bitcoin. It just seems like a lull before another price hike. Is anyone else waiting for a price drop?

this is the greed/fear paralysis. over and over, my friends and family express an interest to get into bitcoin, but want to wait until a price dip. then, when there is a dip, they fear a crash and don't want in. Then it hits a new ATH and they want in again...on the next dip.



13. Post 4363076 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on January 07, 2014, 10:24:25 AM
I am about to buy 7 bitcoin. It just seems like a lull before another price hike. Is anyone else waiting for a price drop?

this is the greed/fear paralysis. over and over, my friends and family express an interest to get into bitcoin, but want to wait until a price dip. then, when there is a dip, they fear a crash and don't want in. Then it hits a new ATH and they want in again...on the next dip.

most who even want to buy on a crash, won't even make and account and send some funds to stagger bear buys Cheesy

I stagger bear buys AND bull sells. I would literally go crazy trying to perfectly time the market and missing almost every time.



14. Post 4363574 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: medialab101 on January 07, 2014, 11:14:36 AM
Red candles all around, we may be heading back down to the 900's range.

a week ago, we would have been happy to find ourselves in the 900s range this week. ride the honeybadger, Hoss. this ain't the merry go round.



15. Post 4363728 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Quote from: T.Stuart on January 07, 2014, 11:20:27 AM
I am about to buy 7 bitcoin. It just seems like a lull before another price hike. Is anyone else waiting for a price drop?

this is the greed/fear paralysis. over and over, my friends and family express an interest to get into bitcoin, but want to wait until a price dip. then, when there is a dip, they fear a crash and don't want in. Then it hits a new ATH and they want in again...on the next dip.

funny but it seems to work this way. People  want to be on safe side and have a huge gain at the same time. When I argue that it is  rather rare  to accommodate both features in the same investment, they look at me like I'am insane person.

Show them the log charts. Strongly discourage them from visiting this forum. Get them to visit a Bitcoin conference.

Teaching them is not as hard as getting them to discard what they think they already know.  I think it's hilarious when broke-ass people, eyeballs deep in debt try to give me financial advice.



16. Post 4460523 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 12, 2014, 03:26:10 AM
It seems very hard for the price to stay above 1000.
It seems that tens of thousands of coins were bought by speculators at 1000 USD or more, just before the all-time high, on the assumption that the price would keep rising. Some of those speculators must have grown disenchanted and will dump those coins as soon as the price returns to that level.

I actually hope that's true, because as soon as the wankers get out of the game, liquidity will dry up and we'll sooner reach a new ATH. I predicted it will take three months to shake out all the weak hands. I'm standing by that prediction. two months to go.



17. Post 4460902 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on January 12, 2014, 05:56:27 AM
It seems very hard for the price to stay above 1000.
It seems that tens of thousands of coins were bought by speculators at 1000 USD or more, just before the all-time high, on the assumption that the price would keep rising. Some of those speculators must have grown disenchanted and will dump those coins as soon as the price returns to that level.

I actually hope that's true, because as soon as the wankers get out of the game, liquidity will dry up and we'll sooner reach a new ATH. I predicted it will take three months to shake out all the weak hands. I'm standing by that prediction. two months to go.

I've been reading shaking out the weak hands since it was at 100 or so.
And i will keep reading about it with every dump this year i'm afraid See what i'm trying to say?

Not really. You seem to be making my point for me. Every dump does shake out weak hands. it only stayed at the ~100$ for six months or so. The recovery from the 2011 crash took 18 months. i believe the recovery time is correlated with the proportional rise of price in the rally. by that metric, we have three months to wait (give or take 3 three months) before the next rally.



18. Post 4461007 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: Richy_T on January 12, 2014, 06:11:02 AM

Curious, what does the article say why this is bad? I can't make out any argument, just a prolonged statement that it is.

As the website is fond of saying, it's about the meta-context. If you don't see why these things are bad, it probably won't mean much to you. If you can, it explains how the government is creating huge amounts of money and hiding the problem away for someone else to deal with later and actually accelerating the underlying problems (Why are we paying interest on money that nobody is using and where does the money to pay that interest come from anyway? And perhaps more telling, who is it going to?).

I went back and read the article since it's been a while and you really can't see where it says why it's bad? Roll Eyes

seems obvious to me. The FED is creating money and giving it to banksters, effectively stealing the purchasing power of private citizens and giving it to the very people who caused the crisis in the first place. Zombie banks get recapitalized so the don't look like zombies anymore, even though they have a funny smell and unnatural expressions on their faces. The problem got papered over and never fixed. The entire housing market is being artificially levitated on a cushion of counterfeit money which protects homeowners a little, the banks a lot, and really screws anyone wanting to become a first time buyer. household formation is grinding to a halt.



19. Post 4475682 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 12, 2014, 11:36:35 PM
so you think bitcoin has reached its maximum potential value?
Since the market price is now largely determined by the combined expectations of all traders, with no clear "base value", is hard to predict which way it will go.  My feeling is that it will not rise much above its all-time high of ~1200 USD.

But of course it is just a feeling, although I believe it is justified by what I understand of economy and politics.


Has your understanding of economy and politics changed since you started watching bitcoin? are your convictions stronger or weaker?  When new information come along, you can either learn or rationalize. two years ago, even here on this forum, the doubters were many and loud. the eventually leave and new doubters show up. Never saw even a single on admit he was wrong, so rationalizing rather than learning seems to be the normal reaction. But it's the few who are capable of learning who will change the world. 1%/year  is huge.  Future economists will look at today's mainstream economists the way today's doctors look at witchdoctors. The Austrians are being validated and it causes much consternation and cognitive dissonance amongst the statist econoboobs. entertainment and profit. it's win-win for me :-)



20. Post 4478052 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on January 13, 2014, 02:55:59 AM
Bizarre story of a penny stock gold company switching to bitcoin mining and to develop an exchange; claim to have 550k bitcoins already!!  Huh

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1074434?ref=feeds/latest


Pump and Dump?  Wink


Another bitcoin related pennystock having a good day:
http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/MYRY:US

1) Create Bitcoin-related company and issue penny stocks.
2) ?
3) Profit.

And that actually works! Smiley

I would like to see them sign a message saying they own 550K coins from an address that has 550K BTC in it.

Which will not happen.

I agree, but how great is it that such a verification is possible? if they can provide that kind of evidence of legitimacy, then it's easy to rule out the ones who don't.



21. Post 4538643 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: mellowyellow on January 16, 2014, 03:23:59 AM


You would hope that by the time 1 BTC = $10,000 USD the fluctuations or volatility in these 'early years' will have subsided. Otherwise, we could be seeing swings between $10,000 and $100,000 each month! The stress levels of BTC day-traders seem high enough as it is... what would happen then??

It would make it fail. Bitcoin can only work if it is stablilised.

Noted. But then, at what would you consider the 'make-or-break' price? If volatility still continues >$10,000 then you are saying Bitcoin will fail?

I don't really think the price matters so much as it being stable. If it rises too quickly people won't spend them, if it loses value often people will be scared to buy them. Remember most of us here are miners, early adopters or pure speculators. For the normal guy on the street volatility is one more headache he could avoid by simply using a debit card.

It may still rise exponentially in this early phase but that is also purely speculation, it is just as likely to bounce between 600 and 1200 over the next 6 months while people / countries enter and exit the market. It could also be replaced by government developed cryto currencies where governments want the benefits of btc but sell their coins at rates pegged to the national currencies. Any scenario is just as likely as an other.

Bitcoin may actually get more volatile as we round the first elbow of the technology adoption "S" curve but will stabilize after the second elbow and by "stabilize" I mean slow close to linear rather than exponential increases in value. The problem always is AS COMPARED TO WHAT? Since fiat currencies depreciate against all commodities over time, BTC may well continue increasing exponentially in value until the fiat currency fails.



22. Post 4568947 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on January 17, 2014, 07:07:20 PM
Patience.... wait until everyone is sure the price is going lower.

That is the time to buy.

I always know the best time to buy...a day after it happens.



23. Post 4570360 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

I read you bastards often enough to notice patterns. Gloom and doom until the banks close on Friday and nobody can get fresh fiat to the exchanges, THEN you buy like sailors on leave with nobody around to outbid you. I'm keeping some powder dry.



24. Post 4570383 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on January 17, 2014, 08:37:29 PM
Patience.... wait until everyone is sure the price is going lower.

That is the time to buy.

I always know the best time to buy...a day after it happens.

i still think it was in 2011 Wink
I bought in 2011 at the peak of $31. Good thing I hedl.



25. Post 4570820 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Overstock is using Coinbase, NOT Bitpay, Geniuses.



26. Post 4601459 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: [Default Trust] is Tyrannically Centralized! (goat) on January 19, 2014, 03:33:47 PM
yay weekend rally back on

Not that i really care but where did the dips go?

the rear view mirror. bought at $789 just sold. BOOyah!



27. Post 4601614 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: MikeH on January 19, 2014, 03:47:39 PM
the rear view mirror. bought at $789 just sold. BOOyah!

bummer, right before the launch to new ATH.



don't worry. I still have plenty to sell you then. ;-)



28. Post 4602596 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: MatTheCat on January 19, 2014, 04:34:36 PM
the rear view mirror. bought at $789 just sold. BOOyah!

Congrats with that, goign by time of your post seems like you just about hit the top.

I have been trying to short all the way from $810. Lost about $400 so far today.

Still shorting though and now that sentiment of the gamblamaniacs on Huobi seems to have changed course, my bets might actually start coming good.

I hate selling coins, but my job doesn't pay all the bills. I bought in with money I couldn't afford to lose Friday and that's why I sold today. I'm a long term bull of course, and this little day trade bought me some time. I beat the bots for once!



29. Post 4618305 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

the line showing the uptrend in these log charts is obviously flatter than the trend it is supposed to be showing.



30. Post 4625460 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: adnanabbas on January 20, 2014, 12:44:15 PM
An exponential log chart? is this the end of the world??
No, as the chart bases on MtGox, this "exponential correction" just accounts for fiat withdrawal troubles... Grin

Has anyone managed to get fiat out of gox. I have about 2.5k in there

had $2000 left there myself. waited over two months before I gave up, cut my losses and converted back to BTC at their outrageously inflated prices, but at least i got something. FtGox is dying running out of coins to trade. that's hwy the price is so high there. I lost close to 20%.  Mark pissed away a billion dollar opportunity with that company.



31. Post 4626016 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Coinbase is down. This should be interesting. Nobody really knows their volume.

and you altcoin assholes need to stick to your own threads and subforums. The Moderator here is really dropping the ball.



32. Post 4626785 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: ZoSo15 on January 20, 2014, 08:13:38 PM
I've come to conclusion that declaring one's bearish sentiment here on the forums is a bad idea. It'll just make the whales want to squeeze you out even more.  Wink

I really wish there was a safe reliable way to lend out my coins to bears for short-selling. I'd get more coins and market slides would be halted by bears covering their shorts. it would be win-win. and I'd get the added entertainment of short-squeeze drama.



33. Post 4627697 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: MatTheCat on January 20, 2014, 08:25:12 PM
I really wish there was a safe reliable way to lend out my coins to bears for short-selling. I'd get more coins and market slides would be halted by bears covering their shorts. it would be win-win. and I'd get the added entertainment of short-squeeze drama.

Got to Bitfinex and do it there.......don't know why anyone would want to as the interest rate paid is something like 0.03% per day (i.e. totally shit), but there is generally around 2000 BTC available at any one time for margin trading.

yeah, interest rate is too low and Bitfinex isn't established enough for me to feel comfortable putting too many BTC there...yet.



34. Post 4627784 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: Salivan on January 20, 2014, 08:57:53 PM
An exponential log chart? is this the end of the world??
No, as the chart bases on MtGox, this "exponential correction" just accounts for fiat withdrawal troubles... Grin

Has anyone managed to get fiat out of gox. I have about 2.5k in there

had $2000 left there myself. waited over two months before I gave up, cut my losses and converted back to BTC at their outrageously inflated prices, but at least i got something. FtGox is dying running out of coins to trade. that's hwy the price is so high there. I lost close to 20%.  Mark pissed away a billion dollar opportunity with that company.

I also gave up after waiting over 2 months.
They put the money back into my account at my request and I also converted back to bitcoin (at a loss),  just to get the hell out of there.
Dreadful place to try getting fiat from.
heh I am more patient than others, waiting above 2 months and  still have hope,
don't want to suffer 20% loss

Good luck.,  Please keep us posted.I would actually be happy if Gox can salvage this implosion, but I'm not expecting it.



35. Post 4628249 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: deadfi$h on January 20, 2014, 09:18:45 PM
That said though, I'm not convinced that we're making a move in any direction until we break out of this range (4660 - 5150 Huobi, 765 - 850 Bitstamp). We could very well oscillate up and down in range until after the 1st. Looking for a strong break of 850 to confirm a move up.
We will be up an out well before the first - this week easily.
not easily in the ongoing  lateral Movement, but it will go up at least direct after the weekend.

You underestimate what happened over the past two days.

If you're looking for a move up, testing that low on 1/17 followed by a bounce up toward the range high was good. Can't say we're out of this sideways channel until we actually break out though. We could bounce right back down and retest support at ~785 (Stamp).

Unlikely, Hoss. I and about a thousand other guys provided that support and will again. I'd love to get more cheap coins, but doubt I'll get the opportunity.



36. Post 4632716 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

this is BITCOINtalk.org, not Dogecointalk. You fuckers are just being rude. I don't go to your house, piss in the flowerpot and shit on your rug. Please do us the same courtesy. You have your own, threads, your own subforum, your own reddit. use them and leave us alone. We don't want you here. You are like juveniles. you missed the early adopter phase and you think it's unfair. tough shit. life ain't fair. It'll be even less fair when your shitcoin tanks but I won't invade your space and gloat about it cuz, you know, I'm better than you. Now do me the favor of fucking off and possibly dying, but that last part is up to you. Thanks.



37. Post 4633760 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: adnanabbas on January 21, 2014, 02:17:45 AM
It's because Emptygox doesn't spit out the money it owes its customers.
Does this have any relation with MtGOX's withdrawal delays?
http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/23/4651926/us-government-seized-5-million-from-bitcoin-behemoth-mt-gox

Is it confirmed that JPY withdrawals work?  What prevents one from withdrawing in JPY and then converting to USD by other channels?

Nothing, that channel of arbitrage works afaik. SEPA (I hear up to 5-6 weeks) and JPY (I hear up to 1-2 weeks) have some delays as well though. SWIFT on the other hand will never go through, as the queue dates back more than half a year and it's growing.

Im in Canada, does this mean I am never getting my 2.5k out of gox Huh
I'm in Canada also, I briefly looked at Gox, but I could not see any reliable way to get fiat in or out. (as a miner, getting fiat out is a bit of a concern)

luckily cavirtex opened soon after and now I can get fiat out in a couple days instead of a couple months...

This sucks, because now I have to wait till the coin goes down in price to buy back what I sold them for, to top it off they haven't verified my account yet. It has been more than 3 weeks

The price prolly won't drop at Gox because too many people like us are waiting for it to happen. They'd have to make some major announcement like a deal with a big bank to fully automate SWIFT withdrawals and I really doubt that will occur. Best thing IMHO would be for Mark K to sell out to someone who has his shit together.  Some smart VC should be making him a sales pitch on that right now. Gox is hemorrhaging market share and that price differential (that is widening) is just the sound of a dying beast.  



38. Post 4634083 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: adnanabbas on January 21, 2014, 03:07:56 AM
It's because Emptygox doesn't spit out the money it owes its customers.
Does this have any relation with MtGOX's withdrawal delays?
http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/23/4651926/us-government-seized-5-million-from-bitcoin-behemoth-mt-gox

Is it confirmed that JPY withdrawals work?  What prevents one from withdrawing in JPY and then converting to USD by other channels?

Nothing, that channel of arbitrage works afaik. SEPA (I hear up to 5-6 weeks) and JPY (I hear up to 1-2 weeks) have some delays as well though. SWIFT on the other hand will never go through, as the queue dates back more than half a year and it's growing.

Im in Canada, does this mean I am never getting my 2.5k out of gox Huh
I'm in Canada also, I briefly looked at Gox, but I could not see any reliable way to get fiat in or out. (as a miner, getting fiat out is a bit of a concern)

luckily cavirtex opened soon after and now I can get fiat out in a couple days instead of a couple months...

This sucks, because now I have to wait till the coin goes down in price to buy back what I sold them for, to top it off they haven't verified my account yet. It has been more than 3 weeks

The price prolly won't drop at Gox because too many people like us are waiting for it to happen. They'd have to make some major announcement like a deal with a big bank to fully automate SWIFT withdrawals and I really doubt that will occur. Best thing IMHO would be for Mark K to sell out to someone who has his shit together.  Some smart VC should be making him a sales pitch on that right now. Gox is hemorrhaging market share and that price differential (that is widening) is just the sound of a dying beast.  

I will be happy if it goes to about 880. Do you think its a possibility?

of course it's possible, but by no means certain. It may take weeks, months or eternity so it depends on how long you can afford to wait. MtGox could just go out of business and then you're stuck at 100% loss. Tough call, I know. Really hope it works out for you.



39. Post 4637441 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on January 21, 2014, 07:47:04 AM
so gox bux is becoming worthless, $150 between gox and all exchanges.... and most of the action is happening there...

Pretty much. Willy is dominating the market. How long is this going to last? Anyone know? How long did it last last time?

somebody got an ass load of fiat they trying to get out.   That should tell you something.  i wonder if gox shuts it's doors if the price will move much on the other exchanges.  many see it coming already, apparently.



40. Post 4646365 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: MatTheCat on January 21, 2014, 05:25:54 PM
Why are you paying interest to borrow btc when you have btc you could just sell?

It is a question of allocation of funds.

I don't own any BTC at the moment. Infact I owe 18 BTC. What I have are funds spread across two exchanges; Bitstamp, my main exchange and also Bitfinex which allow for market corroding parasite rat antics such as leveraged speculation. To get funds onto Bitfinex, I buy Bitcoin on Bitstamp, and send it over to Bitfinex where I change into USD to provide liquidity for my short positions.....

.....I only learned that there was an exchange offering this service just recently.

It is not that often I am certain about which way Bitcoin is going to move but right now I am pretty fkn certain that shorting is best course of action over next day or three....might not be a whole lot in it (i.e. another rebound at $760-$770 level), but I am totally convinced that if there are any speculative gains to be made in the immediate future in Bitcoin, it is on the short side.

totally convinced, eh? Can I quote you on that later?



41. Post 4652594 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Just struck me that a possible explanation for the "Willy" buybot on Gox is that Magical Tux does not have enough coins to make his depositors whole. If he is indeed illegally operating as a fractional reserve, then he would need more and more coins to keep the illusion going.  With the fiat withdrawal backlog, the bot could be buying with money that is supposed to be pending for withdrawal. For all we know, he already left town. When was Mark K's last known public appearance?



42. Post 4655570 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: shmadz on January 22, 2014, 01:56:06 AM
What is going on at gox? Is gox trying to lead a rally by itself? Or is this the usual trapped fiat eruption?

Whatever is going on, it is showing up Gox's USD IOUs to be totally worthless.

Not good PR for them at all!

After GOX pops, how bad do you think it will get as all the exchanges start to capitulate at once? you think we might see 500 again?

May not happen at all. I think it is being priced in already. Price may actually go up with a resolution to this fiasco.



43. Post 4656695 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: bobdude17 on January 22, 2014, 03:52:21 AM
Seattle Seahawks are now accepting bitcoin according to Bitpays Google+ page https://plus.google.com/103321420256995341273/posts/GVFubWzVmsm

This is the only source though.

need confirmation for sure. This would be huge.



44. Post 4675424 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

So far, this is a "down" day, and Bitcoin hasn't had more than three down days in a row since Sept. 2013.  This is the third down day. 



45. Post 4675626 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: bambou on January 23, 2014, 12:00:14 AM
So far, this is a "down" day, and Bitcoin hasn't had more than three down days in a row since Sept. 2013.  This is the third down day. 

Maybe BTC is about to establish another new record?

if it break the 3 days pattern i am afraid the panic is going to be huge..

Yeah, but in which direction? We all know what happened after last September.



46. Post 4676476 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 23, 2014, 12:06:13 AM
The prospect of more than three down days in a row hasn't been keeping me awake at night so far.

Now it's been mentioned I guess I had better start panicking as soon as possible. I'm not really in the mood though.

You might have it backwards. These "bears" are actually waiting for a (re)entry-point.  Money is piling up on the sidelines.



47. Post 4676629 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: bambou on January 23, 2014, 01:07:17 AM
The prospect of more than three down days in a row hasn't been keeping me awake at night so far.

Now it's been mentioned I guess I had better start panicking as soon as possible. I'm not really in the mood though.

You might have it backwards. These "bears" are actually waiting for a (re)entry-point.  Money is piling up on the sidelines.

yeah but at some point these 'bulls' will loose their patience since no new money will come in and they will be even more sensitive to quick dips, turning them eventually into big drops. Wink
In four years, I have never seen a big drop after sideways motion. Drops come after peaks. It's entirely possible that sub $800 coins will never come back. I hope they do, so I can buy more, but I'm in a club with many, many members.



48. Post 4677347 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 23, 2014, 01:35:50 AM

Sub 800 wouldn't even be worth the wait. If that is all you are waiting for might as well just go all in now. You are talking about .15 BTC difference. Most people are waiting for $500 and lower.

I'm close to all-in, but my job as a speculator is to help stabilize the price (buy low sell high and make bitcoin more useful for merchants). Can't very well do that without some dry powder, can I?

It gets below $500 and I start selling motorcycles, trucks, houses to buy much, much more- but it's just no going to happen. Bitcoin hodlers who didn't sell after a drop from $1200 to $500 sure as hell won't panic after a drop from $800 to $500. The panicky and their bitcoins soon part. We hodlers are battle-hardened veterans.



49. Post 4677798 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on January 23, 2014, 02:30:09 AM
No. Your only job as a speculator is to get rich at everyone else's expense.

The free market is not zero sum. Both parties to a trade must feel that they are better off, otherwise, no trade will occur. I provide liquidity and if I provide it when it is most needed, I profit. I soak up excess liquidity, and if I do it when it is needed, I profit. I serve the market, and market participants like you. If I do my job well, I make money. If I do my job poorly, I lose money. If you want to get rich at everyone else's expense, I suggest you work in government.



50. Post 4678571 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: MAbtc on January 23, 2014, 03:24:24 AM
Ancaps depress the shit out of me. Undecided

LOL. why? It's more uplifting to believe we need guys with guns pointed at everybody in order for society to survive? Schadz, you are serving the market by looking out for #1. That's the beauty of it. The free market uses human nature to make society better. Government tries to change human nature by threatening massive violence. The problem is that government officials are subject to the same flawed human nature as the people they rule, er, govern.

Bitcoin proves that we don't need a monopoly on violence AKA the State. Decentralized governance is better. How often does a guy like me get the chance to get rich while simultaneously supporting the cause he believes in? Good time to be alive.



51. Post 4679022 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: aminorex on January 23, 2014, 04:12:14 AM
New York is not that important.  It's one state in 50.  They can regulate themselves out of the real economy and it won't bother me.  I'd rather enjoy watching them hang themselves.  I spend about half of my time in NYC, and I can tell you it's a fascist nightmare of a place, a vast orgy of vanity envy greed lust gluttony deceit degradation rape robbery and murder.  The only thing that makes it remotely tolerable is the social/intellectual/career opportunities, and a big bubble of money to protect you from the misery all around you.  Float from cloud to cloud, and it won't feel too bad, as you won't have to look at the brutality, the suffering.  But of course you are just denying reality.  Money is an enabler that way.  It helps you live in a world of make-believe.  Wealth is essentially a kind of terminal insanity, in which you become utterly detached from reality, truth, real visceral life.

Bitcoin's enemies are divided into two camps. One says it's a joke and will fail on it's own. The other says it's a dangerous threat to the status quo. We can exploit this with a divide and conquer strategy because obviously they can't both be right. Wall Street knows how to hedge, and the hedge bet is to split the difference, buy into bitcoin with some tiny fraction of the wealth they control. An outright ban will leave them next to record stores and newspapers in the dustbin of history. I think they know this, but in the long run it doesn't matter. Adapt or die. Nobody can disinvent this technology.

Extreme wealth may be insanity, but bitcoin is the most democratic money on the planet. in a free market, wealth distribution is still unequal, but less so because the marginal utility of money is like any other marginal utility. Only with the uneven playing field created by the State can wealth disparity reach the levels we see today.



52. Post 4679328 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: MAbtc on January 23, 2014, 04:34:35 AM
Ancaps depress the shit out of me. Undecided

LOL. why? It's more uplifting to believe we need guys with guns pointed at everybody in order for society to survive?
^^^
This is exactly why. Because that makes a lot of sense – I question ancap, and therefore I want guns pointed at everyone in society. Roll Eyes It’s always these same straw men. Perhaps there are other philosophies that do not advocate such dynamics...

This is a logical conclusion. Do you need me to spell it out? Government by definition is a monopoly of initiatory violence in a given geographical area. Arbitrary rules are enforced by threat of violence regardless of whether or not one has consented to be governed by those rules. I can smoke a joint, make a bet, or rent a hooker, violate nobody's rights and still find myself facing down a gun barrel from some costumed goon with a badge. You say I can move, but I can't. Some other violence monopoly set up shop anywhere else I could move to. If governments provided any goods or services worth having, they wouldn't need to force us to pay for them. We'd do it willingly. I should be able to shop for traditionally government-provided services like I shop for anything else. Instead I am kidnapped (arrested) for not paying the protection money (taxes). If I resist, I'm tased or shot. if I try to escape jail, I'm shot. Taxes are involuntary, which means they are theft. You can't pretend it's not theft just because the State is the thief.

I'm not against rules. I'm not against governance. I'm against monopoly and centralization. I'm not even against violence. I'm against initiatory violence. Defensive violence is obviously and unfortunately sometimes necessary, but if you think the State isn't a gun pointed at your face, try not paying your taxes.  

"Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." - George Washington



53. Post 4679428 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat on January 23, 2014, 04:40:21 AM
Just for the lulz I bought 1.6 million DOGE.

The Bitcoin Foundation is pissing me off so much I think we might need something like this...

Can I borrow them? I'll pay you back right after the crash. Wait, did it crash already? Can't imagine you bought at ATH.  

What'd the foundation do this time?



54. Post 4679637 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: mah87 on January 23, 2014, 05:32:36 AM
Just for the lulz I bought 1.6 million DOGE.

The Bitcoin Foundation is pissing me off so much I think we might need something like this...

Why don't use buy useful ripples instead Huh


hahaha, my sides:)   id rather use fiat!


I still don't get why people ignore that ripple is the next step for cryto ... =/

because XRP is pre-mined, obviously.  Also Ripple is based on trust in people. Bitcoin is based on not trusting people.  The market decides.



55. Post 4679737 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Holliday on January 23, 2014, 05:38:34 AM
I just mailed your posts to some participants from the upcoming senate hearing...

Can you share their email addresses? I'd like to send a few emails myself.

not sure what you wrote, Fonzie. Yer on my ignore list. So sad. You were so cool, but then you jumped the shark and then you started selling reverse mortgages on TV commercials. How the mighty have fallen. such sit on it. much up your nose with a rubber hose.



56. Post 4680138 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: MAbtc on January 23, 2014, 06:00:19 AM

Dude, no thanks. I wasted two years of my life espousing that morally bankrupt philosophy and that's two years I'll never get back. Speaking as an anarchist, your conclusion was not logical. It seems that you see ancap and state capitalism as polar opposites. I don't see it that way. Pushed to extremes, ancap/NAP under private property can justify the very basest of human action -- there simply are no limits under a purely capitalist paradigm. (Just ask Walter Block.) Should monopolistic dynamics arise, how genuine is the right of exit that you mentioned in rpietila’s thread? I am of the opinion that consent does not exist without viable alternatives. There are compelling reasons why mutualists and market anarchists historically opposed private property, and viewed the state as far more expansive than simply "government."

But seeing as this is a bitcoin forum, I probably shouldn't discuss this here. If you are interested in my thoughts on this subject, PM me.


Dr. Block teaches at Tulane just down the road from me. Pretty smart guy. I think you might misunderstand him.  The root of our disagreement seems to be private property which you appear to be opposed to. This actually ties into the thread topic because ownership effectively meas control.  If you know the private key to a bitcoin address, you own it, regardless of how you acquired that knowledge. That's the way it is, regardless of how you think it ought to be. The State cannot control society so it makes no difference if you think it should. The State has powerful influence, but that's not the same thing. That influence is decreasing with the advent of new technology. This cannot be stopped, only discouraged. A smart government would tolerate it and even appear to embrace it because to do otherwise would show how powerless it really is.

The very basest of human action can be justified under any philosophy. It's wise to see things as they are and not what you think they ought to be. A true understanding is the only guarantee that your good intentions actually produce good results rather than harm. There will always be evil people. Concentrating power only attracts them. Distributing control minimizes that harm they can do.



57. Post 4680355 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 23, 2014, 06:00:41 AM

Sub 800 wouldn't even be worth the wait. If that is all you are waiting for might as well just go all in now. You are talking about .15 BTC difference. Most people are waiting for $500 and lower.

I'm close to all-in, but my job as a speculator is to help stabilize the price (buy low sell high and make bitcoin more useful for merchants). Can't very well do that without some dry powder, can I?

It gets below $500 and I start selling motorcycles, trucks, houses to buy much, much more- but it's just no going to happen. Bitcoin hodlers who didn't sell after a drop from $1200 to $500 sure as hell won't panic after a drop from $800 to $500. The panicky and their bitcoins soon part. We hodlers are battle-hardened veterans.
It happens all the time in these types of moves. I just posted an chart of that very thing occurring. Many who have coins will sell if they think the price is going back down to sub $500 or close to. Same thing happened in the last move to $260. There was a massive sell-off, it rose back again to $160 or more, then came back down to $60, back up to $120, down again briefly, and then on to $1250. That is how it works, the price doesn't just pick a spot after a huge move and stay there levitating. There is still a lot of uncertainty and lack of confidence in the price.

Sure, it COULD happen, but it's unlikely, IMHO. It doesn't take a genius to read a four year log chart and realize there's an awful lot of freshly-printed fiat sloshing around right now looking for the next bubble. That QE money has got to go somewhere. if 1% of 1% makes in into bitcoin,  That's $8 million/month just in the U.S.A. 108000 bitcoins /month are being mined, that's $74/BTC. Now if you consider almost all central banks are printing like mad, multiply that by 20 and you get to $1481/BTC.  at one percent of one percent. For banksters, it's a hedge bet. life insurance. It's the smart move and I hope they don't take it, but they prolly will.



58. Post 4681011 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: aminorex on January 23, 2014, 07:36:04 AM
I hope they don't take it, but they prolly will.

Mostly won't, at least not if they're old.  By that time they believe their own propaganda.  That's the danger of lying all day -- eventually you start to believe it.  Then reality bites.

I agree. Only one percent of the one-percenters have to buy BTC with their free money. And that's if the rest of us do nothing. What are the odds the other six and a half billion people are going to just stand around watching the purchasing power of our fiat drain away?  

On the other end of the spectrum you got guys like me. I had nothing. I maxed out my credit cards in 2011 and bought in around $10/BTC because I had nothing to lose. A lot of 0% APR credit cards out there.  Sure, you shouldn't borrow to invest, but the entire housing market is built on doing just that. Look at the four year log chart. It would be a lot less stupid and risky to do that today than when I did it three years ago.



59. Post 4681332 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 23, 2014, 08:15:10 AM
Quote
Extreme wealth may be insanity, but bitcoin is the most democratic money on the planet. in a free market, wealth distribution is still unequal, but less so because the marginal utility of money is like any other marginal utility. Only with the uneven playing field created by the State can wealth disparity reach the levels we see today.

I want to see some rigorous studies done to demonstrate these facts unequivocally ... I'm quite sure it is the case. If we had some good observational evidence of this we could rub the Statists' noses in it every time they bring up their mad-cap wealth inequality and taxation, property redistribution propaganda. The wealth inequality is the direct product of the State, and mostly Central Banks, interfering in natural free market processes of creative destruction that remove wealth from incompetent, corrupt or simply unfortunately-timed ventures and places it in areas society demands. With the massive capital mis-allocation practised by the Central banks, and their cronies in the Mega banks, wealth is pooling in ever increasing size in essentially useless holdings, while much of the world starves for liquidity and is over-run with unpayable government debts.

There are so many ways of tilting the playing field , that I'm afraid it would be extremely difficult to prove empirically. Barriers to entry are as varied as snowflakes. The best one I know of is the metrics used by the World Health Organization that showed Somalia actually improved in most measured areas under statelessness. Unfortunately wealth distribution was not one of those metrics. Legally nuanced differences between property ownership and control also make wealth distribution measurements problematic. Logically, it's easily proven via public choice economics and praxeology, which is prolly why those fields of economics are given such short shrift by the establishment.



60. Post 4681726 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: MAbtc on January 23, 2014, 08:40:06 AM
Regarding Block, I'm fairly sure I don't misunderstand him. See his thoughts on slave contracts, or sexual harassment in the workplace. What do you think of his views? Here, you are conflating private property with ownership; that should not imply that I oppose ownership, or advocate for "state" ownership, or any such thing.

Yes, I agree with Block on those views also, because the alternative is worse. The HR gestapo that polices sex harassment issues in modern work-spaces is worse. And if my Navy enlistment wasn't a slave-contract, then I don't know what one is. But this is something for another thread.

Quote
I'm an anarchist, and I don't consider ancaps to be anarchists. Even Rothbard agreed with that. Regardless, the idea of morality is a bit more expansive than "government"...

I don't really care if you consider me a true anarchist or not. I'm Rothbardian and we both know what that means. I hold that the State is neither morally legitimate or necessary, but private property is.  Couldn't care less if I'm in your extremely unpopular club or not.

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 23, 2014, 06:35:15 AM
The very basest of human action can be justified under any philosophy. It's wise to see things as they are and not what you think they ought to be.
On the first point, this is patently false. On the second, how do you say this after writing out the Rothbardian boilerplate on morality? To be clear, you believe that voluntary contracts justify anything, right? I noticed you didn't address my question about what happens when monopolistic dynamics arise in an ancap society -- how meaningful is consent then? How "free" is such a market, and how ethical are usurious contracts entered into by such force of circumstance?

You said you were against monopoly -- see Benjamin Tucker. The absence of government won't mean that monopolies are magicked away, and ancap theory has no problem with that.
[/quote]

With respect to Mr. Tucker, monopolies are only possible under the State. Private monopolies start to lose market share the moment they exploit their dominant position unless the State prevents them from doing so. Even the most capital-intensive industries see competition. Virgin Galactic is a good example. OTOH, a monopoly may exist if it doesn't exploit it's dominant position, but why would we even care in that case? Competition is there to benefit consumers, not competitors.

and if voluntary contracts don't justify everything, then you have to be saying that people do not have the right to enter into certain kinds of contracts, even if they want to do so. Who decides what types of contracts are ok? You? You think you can take away people's rights for their own good? Who are you to interfere? You think you can run people's lives better than they can? Do you have the same incentives to make the right choices? obviously you don't, even if you're sooooo much smarter and wiser than them. Such arrogance.

Not believing in property would be like claiming Bitcoin could function with two public keys and no private keys. Your'e not against bitcoin because you don't think it works. You're against it because it works too well. well, your cognitive dissonance is not my problem. Welcome to my ignore list.



61. Post 4683456 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on January 23, 2014, 10:47:56 AM
You've done nothing to prove that monopolies are only possible under government. That's just ancap dogma.

I'm interested in this. Not quite sure who the burden of proof should fall upon here - the one claiming that monopolies are possible only with government or the one claiming monopolies are possible without government. We certainly have lots of cases of monopolies co-existing with government, but I know of no cases of monopolies existing without government. This might primarily be because we have few cases of there being no government, period. Personally I tend to think that the institutionalization of the monopoly on coercive force is quite instrumental in upholding monopolies. I can see them being created without there being a government, but don't see them lasting very long without providing excellent products/services and/or developing government-like qualities themselves. Could you perhaps point me towards some materials supporting your claim that this is just an-cap dogma?

The original monopolies such as the East India Company were explicitly issued exclusive licenses to operate by the State. Later monopolies used more subtle means such as the rigidly-enforced patents and copyrights of Microsoft.

By contrast, Standard Oil http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Oil was given few if any special privileges by the government and is often cited for predatory practices...against competitors, but not consumers. Oil prices actually went up when anti-trust legislation broke it into thirty three separate companies. Ironically, the combined stock value of the 33 companies made Rockefeller even wealthier than he was before.



62. Post 4683691 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Rockefeller didn't gouge his customers because he knew that he wasn't just competing against other oil companies. He was competing against other products such as whale oil and coal. It could even be argued that he is partly responsible for sperm whales not going extinct.



63. Post 4683798 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: cee-euros on January 23, 2014, 10:49:41 AM
fat lump on 820 btc-e, eep!
wow hadnt noticed....over 900 to break 820 now, 2700 to break 830

yeah looks pretty mean

tidal wave about to hit fishing village

Geez. I've seen that before. Maybe I'll get to use that dry powder after all.



64. Post 4690165 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: T.Stuart on January 23, 2014, 05:48:54 PM
None of these companies are going to accept bitcoins directly. Payment through a payment processor is not bullish. It indirectly causes selling pressure on exchanges.

The reasons we didn't see much selling pressure after Overstock is because so few are actually buying things with bitcoin. Overstock did 500k sales total since Jan 9. 125k was on the first day... That is a huge dropoff. Bitcoin = failcurrency.

Don't you think you've heard this point quite a few times already but that it doesn't actually add up?

If people pay with Bitcoin then that means they will buy Bitcoin to begin with.

And for all those who decide to buy some Bitcoin, perhaps spurred on by the fact that they learn they can spend it at Overstock, Ebay and many other places, how many do you think will buy some and then immediately spend all of it? Almost no-body.

Merchants adopting Bitcoin will lead to more and more new customer wallets, the owners of most of which will buy more Bitcoin than they need to spend immediately, leading to more and more fiat moving to Bitcoin over the long term.

Why can't anyone follow the merchant-adoption idea to its logical conclusion - More Bitcoin will be bought than spent.


They know that, but some of the day traders here are in full FUD mode going into the weekend hoping to ignite a panic sell-off so they can buy on the cheap.  It's getting kinda hard to dismiss all the good news rolling in daily. Two kinds of traders: the kind that profit from volatility and reduce volatility are good for bitcoin. The kind that intentionally increase volatility so they can profit from it are bad for Bitcoin. Doesn't really matter much. It's a much less fragile system than it gets credit for.



65. Post 4690405 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: BitChick on January 23, 2014, 05:55:11 PM

Many Bitcoin users will just replenish their BTC when making a purchase on these sites too, if they are still wanting to hold as much coins as possible.

Overstock might be surprised at how much new business they get when bitcoin goes up significantly. Buying stuff may be the best way to take profits from a tax avoidance standpoint. I'm planning a whole bunch of purchases myself.



66. Post 4690695 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: DaRude on January 23, 2014, 06:23:00 PM

Many Bitcoin users will just replenish their BTC when making a purchase on these sites too, if they are still wanting to hold as much coins as possible.

Overstock might be surprised at how much new business they get when bitcoin goes up significantly. Buying stuff may be the best way to take profits from a tax avoidance standpoint. I'm planning a whole bunch of purchases myself.

That, plus anyone knows how much coinbase/bitpay charge merchants to process btc? If it's lower than 3%? credit cards charge merchants will embrace it with both hands as it bumps up their profit margins. Once wall st sees that there's $ to be made and wider adoption they won't sit on side lines.

Coinbase charges 1% with no fees for the first million dollars.



67. Post 4690952 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

It'll be interesting when OS's suppliers also start accepting BTC and they won't need to cash out. For every $100,000/day get's trapped in the bitcoin system with no cashout, it supports a price increase of $27/BTC.  



68. Post 4691155 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: samson on January 23, 2014, 06:47:46 PM
It'll be interesting when OS's suppliers also start accepting BTC and they won't need to cash out. For every $100,000/day get's trapped in the bitcoin system with no cashout, it supports a price increase of $27/BTC.  

That's clearly sustainable  Roll Eyes

more or less sustainable than a fiat world reserve currency from a country that runs trillion dollar deficits?



69. Post 4691733 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: bull1692 on January 23, 2014, 07:12:12 PM
Any speculation why the weekend dips switched to weekend rallies?

We like to mix it up for the fun of it. Keeps you guessing.

seriously, originally the weekday rallies petered out on weekends causing dips because banks were close and nobody could get money to the exchanges. Then people started noticing this and stockpiled fiat looking to scoop up bargains. If the dip didn't come or didn't go low enough, it effectively short-squeezed all the bargain hunters, causing a rally. So using double reverse psychology, we will go back to dips. unless we use double double reverse psychology and have another rally. 



70. Post 4692562 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: DaRude on January 23, 2014, 08:02:30 PM
We´re probably about to get the 5th red daily candle on Stamp in a few hours, that´s bullish isn´t it?
Aren't we still just working on the 4th red candle? At least according to wisdom

With less than four hours to go on bitcoincharts, This will be the first time since early September of last year that we have four red-candle days consecutively. Considering the low volume, I read this as bullish, but we need a good-sized down-tick to put blood in the water and ignite the feeding frenzy.



71. Post 4698766 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 24, 2014, 02:11:28 AM
sub 800!

SUB 800!!!!!!!!!



$803 by my count. juuuust a little more to go.



72. Post 4698874 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 24, 2014, 02:16:44 AM
sub 800!

SUB 800!!!!!!!!!



$803 by my count. juuuust a little more to go.

791.9 on btc-e

If the Chinks are leading this panic, we gonna get some cheap coins, Brothers. Panda Bear trap!



73. Post 4699020 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: mestar on January 24, 2014, 02:24:10 AM
With less than four hours to go on bitcoincharts, This will be the first time since early September of last year that we have four red-candle days consecutively. Considering the low volume, I read this as bullish,

Do you even know what bullish means?



patience.  You'll see.



74. Post 4699220 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

HODL......




75. Post 4699579 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

1st buy completed.



76. Post 4699926 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: SantaMuerte on January 24, 2014, 03:30:12 AM
I sodl  Cry
Need to buy in again, is 750 out of the question for this panic drop?

fail. Buy on the way down. Sell on the way up. unless you have money you don't want.



77. Post 4700006 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 24, 2014, 03:45:05 AM
We need pics of falling knives and trains of fire pls k thnx.

Catching falling knives is my specialty. If it falls more, I'll buy more. I'll hand you that knife on the way back up ;-)



78. Post 4700118 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: ZoSo15 on January 24, 2014, 03:51:55 AM
We need pics of falling knives and trains of fire pls k thnx.

Catching falling knives is my specialty. If it falls more, I'll buy more. I'll hand you that knife on the way back up ;-)



Son, I waited 18 months for it to go back up once. This ain't my first rodeo.



79. Post 4700182 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: OldGeek on January 24, 2014, 03:54:05 AM
Attention plz.  The current flash crash has been cancelled due to lack of interest.  Back to work, you  clods.

Steady as she goes, skipper.

too soon, Junior! Massive dump at stamp.



80. Post 4700340 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: OldGeek on January 24, 2014, 04:08:07 AM
Attention plz.  The current flash crash has been cancelled due to lack of interest.  Back to work, you  clods.

Steady as she goes, skipper.

too soon, Junior! Massive dump at stamp.

A guy can try, right?

The thing about eating a Chinese bear...an hour later you're hungry again  Embarrassed



81. Post 4700946 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

778 on Stamp. Might get another bite soon.



82. Post 4701046 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: MatTheCat on January 24, 2014, 05:10:11 AM
778 on Stamp. Might get another bite soon.

BUY MOAAAR!

QUICK BEFORE THE PRICE GOES BACK UP.

PLEASE!?

Just did! gettin' mah coins back!



83. Post 4701108 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 24, 2014, 05:22:07 AM
778 on Stamp. Might get another bite soon.

BUY MOAAAR!

QUICK BEFORE THE PRICE GOES BACK UP.

PLEASE!?

Just did! gettin' mah coins back!

Don't forget to panic sell at 500 !

LOL. at $500, I'll panic sell my motorcycle to buy bitcoin!



84. Post 4701488 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: analytics on January 24, 2014, 05:42:56 AM
Folks, as you know, ignore the monkeys spouting the sky is falling or the end of bitcoin.
These are shorters trying to make money off of spin if it wasn't obvious enough.
There is no news other than some hints that the economy in china is slowing, most of which is likely fake data that china regularly produces for their own spin.


The sky IS falling in China, but that's all the more reason they should be buying BTC.  Sure as hell wouldn't want to be leveraged, though.  you can't pump 8% GDP groeth for decades without it catching up to you. They got bad loans on the books that makes IndieMac look downright conservative but if my bank was failing, I'd want some bitcoin!



85. Post 4701538 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: versace on January 24, 2014, 05:40:31 AM
looks like we're rebounding soon

That's what yer magik 8 ball told u, Newbie?



86. Post 4701634 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: dgarcia on January 24, 2014, 06:12:00 AM
its probably panic sells based on the economy report out of china.

If it is so, this could be a lot more than only panic selling. In worst case this could be the end of chinese bitcoin.

In the worst case!

Why is that?

Maybe this is caused by the boodle money scandal in china. So it could be that this is more than only panic but rather a real reason.

I doubt we could be that lucky. I'm a kid in a candy store, here



87. Post 4701651 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: DaRude on January 24, 2014, 06:17:44 AM
looks like we're rebounding soon

That's what yer magik 8 ball told u, Newbie?

I don't see panic either, just some whale dumping a lot of coins. Every time huge sell stops market tries to move up on little orders. Lets see how much ammo he has. Still waiting for the weekend though. Can't explain the crash = stuff your coffers

the coffers were already stuffed with money from the coins we sold at $900. We're just buyin' em back now.



88. Post 4701875 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: dgarcia on January 24, 2014, 06:37:19 AM
This drop could endure several days.

gonna need more popcorn. At least it's not boring anymore.



89. Post 4702569 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: dgarcia on January 24, 2014, 07:22:55 AM
Folks, as you know, ignore the monkeys spouting the sky is falling or the end of bitcoin.
These are shorters trying to make money off of spin if it wasn't obvious enough.
There is no news other than some hints that the economy in china is slowing, most of which is likely fake data that china regularly produces for their own spin.



I don't give fuck about this childish bull and baer game (like cowboys and indians?). I'm only interested in protecting my wealth. Maybe this has another reason than i suppose or is only an exaggerated reaction by the chinese.

But if not...

...so I have decided to risk a lost of BTC-Percentage if I'm wrong. What you should do is your decision.

And I'm not talking about the chinese economy, I concerned the black money.

You think your coins are worth less now than they were a week ago, before you could buy stuff with them at Tiger direct, fancy.com and a bunch of porn sites and casinos?
This dip is nothing. If I had panicked when it plunged from $31/BTC to $3/BTC or from $260/BTC to $70/BTC, I wouldn't have any now. Just Chill. This happens with Bitcoin and you should know that. In fact, buy more. You may never get another chance like this.



90. Post 4702915 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Choo choo, motherfuckers.



91. Post 4703190 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Chancellor on January 24, 2014, 08:27:17 AM
I took a risk and bought at $770 on Bitstamp using all my remaining fiat. Looks like I bought the dip Smiley
Not bad Smiley. Unfortunately I was not so clever and bought earlier at 813, so well, now holding is my only tactic.

congrats. I bought at $780 on Coinbase, but it never went down to $770...yet. It got close. If it does, I'll buy more.



92. Post 4703295 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: kehtolo on January 24, 2014, 08:40:01 AM
I think this could take ~ 2 weeks to play out. 2 weeks from today is 7th Feb.
I'm finding it hard to be patient and wait til then to see what happens, but i must. Damn nearly bought at 800 last night.
I expect to see it botto out somewhere in the range $500 - $600 but only temporarily. It should recover quickly, so one would have to be fast to catch the bottom - or pick you price and place you orders, and hope for the best.


I've been hearing that for days from several different people. Where do you get this? I'll be buying the whole way down if you're right, but they seem pretty damn cheap right now.



93. Post 4703579 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: kehtolo on January 24, 2014, 08:51:19 AM
I think this could take ~ 2 weeks to play out. 2 weeks from today is 7th Feb.
I'm finding it hard to be patient and wait til then to see what happens, but i must. Damn nearly bought at 800 last night.
I expect to see it botto out somewhere in the range $500 - $600 but only temporarily. It should recover quickly, so one would have to be fast to catch the bottom - or pick you price and place you orders, and hope for the best.


I've been hearing that for days from several different people. Where do you get this? I'll be buying the whole way down if you're right, but they seem pretty damn cheap right now.

Hpmmm.. just my own observations. Inciddenty, i have been expecting this since the beginning of the year. I think there is money sitting on the sidelines, and people seem to be waiting to see what happens in China on the 31st.
Market seemed to be kept artificially high by trading bots.. keeping it high in order to dump??
These are just some of the indicators i'm going by.
These and a healthy dose of wishful thinknig.

Anway.. looks to be rebounding now. Support at ~$776

A crash that big would be bad for Bitcoin and scare away new investors and more importantly merchants. I believe in this thing and I want it to succeed in the long run, not just make short term money. Of course making money is good too, but it's not my top priority. But maybe a slower adoption rate is better. Most people couldn't handle these swings. That's why there's more slot machines than chairs at the no limit table. Texas Hodl 'em!



94. Post 4704252 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: kehtolo on January 24, 2014, 09:26:18 AM
I think this could take ~ 2 weeks to play out. 2 weeks from today is 7th Feb.
I'm finding it hard to be patient and wait til then to see what happens, but i must. Damn nearly bought at 800 last night.
I expect to see it botto out somewhere in the range $500 - $600 but only temporarily. It should recover quickly, so one would have to be fast to catch the bottom - or pick you price and place you orders, and hope for the best.


I've been hearing that for days from several different people. Where do you get this? I'll be buying the whole way down if you're right, but they seem pretty damn cheap right now.

Hpmmm.. just my own observations. Inciddenty, i have been expecting this since the beginning of the year. I think there is money sitting on the sidelines, and people seem to be waiting to see what happens in China on the 31st.
Market seemed to be kept artificially high by trading bots.. keeping it high in order to dump??
These are just some of the indicators i'm going by.
These and a healthy dose of wishful thinknig.

Anway.. looks to be rebounding now. Support at ~$776

A crash that big would be bad for Bitcoin and scare away new investors and more importantly merchants. I believe in this thing and I want it to succeed in the long run, not just make short term money. Of course making money is good too, but it's not my top priority. But maybe a slower adoption rate is better. Most people couldn't handle these swings. That's why there's more slot machines than chairs at the no limit table. Texas Hodl 'em!

In a way i agree with you. It may not even drop that low and if it does it won't stay there for very long. Might not even see $600.
And anything below this is a bit of wishful thinking on my part.

I'm not looking for short term profit either. I have money waiting on stamp, and i'm trying to get as many coins as possible for this money. More coins the better in the long term. So this is why i'm willing it to go down a bit more. Greed on my part, i'll admit, but not short term greed. I Just want more coins, cheaper prices means more coins.

 careful, Hoss. You might miss the train.



95. Post 4704618 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: manfred on January 24, 2014, 10:11:51 AM
What is going on in the world?
Has bitcoins spirit and purpose been lost and gambles taken over


copycat scammers and greedy opportunists always flock when they think there's easy money to be had. This is the price of success. They think we were just lucky. They will learn the hard way that is was courage in the face of extreme odds that got us here and we won't part with our rewards easily.



96. Post 4704906 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on January 24, 2014, 10:37:22 AM
What is going on in the world?
Has bitcoins spirit and purpose been lost and gambles taken over


This might lead to high volatility in the price of bitcoin

Imagine a few bubbles pop in the altcoins universe at the same time, everyone will rush to cash out their altcoins to bitcoins                    and then (maybe) to USD , leading eventually to the bitcoin/usd price to pop too


Don't know if the market cap of the altcoins can have a big effect in the BTC/USD price
 

If the gamblers are primarily buying altcoins with bitcoin, then I don't see how that's bad for Bitcoin. They couldn't hurt the price anymore than they helped it in the first place. It's not really any different than using bitcoin to gamble dice or poker. Later updates of the Bitcoin client might even adopt some of the good alt-coin ideas. It's when they bypass bitcoin and have altcoin-to-fiat exchanges that it could be a dangerous distraction. Money is the most marketable commodity. Like the Highlander said, "There can be only one." 



97. Post 4713897 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on January 24, 2014, 06:21:11 PM
Crash and burn, papa need some cheap coins!

You had 5 years to buy cheap coins. It's extremely arrogant and really just ridiculous to want a huge economy to crash and burn so that you can buy a few coins 100 bucks cheaper.

Post of the year.

+1000000

Thanks.
These kind of posts really just amaze me.

and then they expect it to bounce back immediately to new all time high, as if the market exists to serve them. No, a crash like that would put us back many months, possibly years. Let the golden goose slip into a coma cuz u don't wanna feed it. Well, we're gonna feed it and you'll miss your chance to reload. (howz that for mixed metaphors?)



98. Post 4715715 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 24, 2014, 08:02:23 PM
Crash and burn, papa need some cheap coins!

You had 5 years to buy cheap coins. It's extremely arrogant and really just ridiculous to want a huge economy to crash and burn so that you can buy a few coins 100 bucks cheaper.
Not all of us have been around bitcoin for 5 years. Some of us are less than a year old.



Tough shit. I started buying in at $6/BTC when it was only pennies a few weeks earlier.  You don't need other people to lose for you to win. Those people who bought in before me deserved it. Those of us who bought in before you deserved it. You think I resent Goat because he's two orders of magnitude ahead of me? Absolutely not. I'll get my turn and you'll get yours if you're humble enough to take it. You want cheap coins? THESE ARE THE CHEAP COINS. Down and up doesn't make you any richer than up and up. The fact that you want the market to crash just makes you an asshole and a fool. A $200 crash will not hasten a new ATH. It will prolong it.



99. Post 4716149 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 24, 2014, 08:39:18 PM
Crash and burn, papa need some cheap coins!

You had 5 years to buy cheap coins. It's extremely arrogant and really just ridiculous to want a huge economy to crash and burn so that you can buy a few coins 100 bucks cheaper.
Not all of us have been around bitcoin for 5 years. Some of us are less than a year old.



Tough shit. I started buying in at $6/BTC when it was only pennies a few weeks earlier.  You don't need other people to lose for you to win. Those people who bought in before me deserved it. Those of us who bought in before you deserved it. You think I resent Goat because he's two orders of magnitude ahead of me? Absolutely not. I'll get my turn and you'll get yours if you're humble enough to take it. You want cheap coins? THESE ARE THE CHEAP COINS. Down and up doesn't make you any richer than up and up. The fact that you want the market to crash just makes you an asshole and a fool. A $200 crash will not hasten a new ATH. It will prolong it.
Good. I want it to take a longer time to reach an ATH. Because I am jobless with almost nothing. So, I can't drop a few thousand and pick up 10 or 100 coins. At these prices I can buy like 2 BTC - at lower prices I can triple that. Its a huge difference for me.

You're a dipshit. let's say you're right and it crashes and you get three coins for the rice of one now. it takes three months to recover and you've trippled up. Or you could just buy one now and the price doubles two months in a row (because nodody got spooked by the crash that didn't happen) and you've got FOUR times your buy-in. I'm not too surprised you're unemployed with little money when you display an attitude like that. And you'll never be richer than me. If it crashes, I'll just be right there buying with you. asshole.



100. Post 4716335 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 24, 2014, 08:54:46 PM
Tough shit. I started buying in at $6/BTC when it was only pennies a few weeks earlier.  You don't need other people to lose for you to win. Those people who bought in before me deserved it. Those of us who bought in before you deserved it. You think I resent Goat because he's two orders of magnitude ahead of me? Absolutely not. I'll get my turn and you'll get yours if you're humble enough to take it. You want cheap coins? THESE ARE THE CHEAP COINS. Down and up doesn't make you any richer than up and up. The fact that you want the market to crash just makes you an asshole and a fool. A $200 crash will not hasten a new ATH. It will prolong it.

Not necessarily. Long, slow downtrend is more detrimental than a two-weeks crash, consolidation and beginning of a new rally. That being said, I am a newbie and might (very possibly) be wrong.

In my defense, check april 2013 vs 2011 "spurts".
He doesn't want to hear that. He is a greedy bastard who is on the verge of becoming a millionaire and only wants to see the price increase to solidify that.

We just had a crash and consolidation. Maybe we need  another one. I don't know, but I don't want to see anybody get hurt, and nobody get's hurt if we only go up from here except the people waiting now for a lower price point with too much cash on the sidelines. I don't have a crystal ball and maybe waiting now is is good strategy, but it's good for Bitcoin if there's less volatility.



101. Post 4716548 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 24, 2014, 09:01:44 PM
Crash and burn, papa need some cheap coins!

You had 5 years to buy cheap coins. It's extremely arrogant and really just ridiculous to want a huge economy to crash and burn so that you can buy a few coins 100 bucks cheaper.
Not all of us have been around bitcoin for 5 years. Some of us are less than a year old.



Tough shit. I started buying in at $6/BTC when it was only pennies a few weeks earlier.  You don't need other people to lose for you to win. Those people who bought in before me deserved it. Those of us who bought in before you deserved it. You think I resent Goat because he's two orders of magnitude ahead of me? Absolutely not. I'll get my turn and you'll get yours if you're humble enough to take it. You want cheap coins? THESE ARE THE CHEAP COINS. Down and up doesn't make you any richer than up and up. The fact that you want the market to crash just makes you an asshole and a fool. A $200 crash will not hasten a new ATH. It will prolong it.
Good. I want it to take a longer time to reach an ATH. Because I am jobless with almost nothing. So, I can't drop a few thousand and pick up 10 or 100 coins. At these prices I can buy like 2 BTC - at lower prices I can triple that. Its a huge difference for me.

You're a dipshit. let's say you're right and it crashes and you get three coins for the rice of one now. it takes three months to recover and you've trippled up. Or you could just buy one now and the price doubles two months in a row (because nodody got spooked by the crash that didn't happen) and you've got FOUR times your buy-in. I'm not too surprised you're unemployed with little money when you display an attitude like that. And you'll never be richer than me. If it crashes, I'll just be right there buying with you. asshole.
The goal is the amount of coins, not how much each coin is currently worth. I am not worried about dollar valuation at this point. I would rather have 3 coins that are in one year worth 4x times their buy-in than to have one coin worth 4x its buy-in in a couple months.

Once it starts getting to $5000 the chances of me accumulating another whole bitcoin ever again are basically ZERO. So, its now or never for me. Now or I am totally locked-out of the game when I got in with plenty of time to make the cut. A couple BTC worth $100,000 in 5-10 years won't mean jack - its more or less a consolation prize. To me, its only worth it if my pot is worth millions.

The number of coins is completely arbitrary. What matters is the value of your total stash. I once had a goal of 1000 coins and I alllllllmost reached it, but I'll never get that now and you know what? doesn't even matter.  It was just a nice round number. Something psychological. What matters is my daughter can have braces, a quincinera, a college education and a wedding some day. 

and a single bitcoin now WILL be worth millions if the multi-year log trend holds.  in only three to five years.



102. Post 4716756 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 24, 2014, 09:08:26 PM
Tough shit. I started buying in at $6/BTC when it was only pennies a few weeks earlier.  You don't need other people to lose for you to win. Those people who bought in before me deserved it. Those of us who bought in before you deserved it. You think I resent Goat because he's two orders of magnitude ahead of me? Absolutely not. I'll get my turn and you'll get yours if you're humble enough to take it. You want cheap coins? THESE ARE THE CHEAP COINS. Down and up doesn't make you any richer than up and up. The fact that you want the market to crash just makes you an asshole and a fool. A $200 crash will not hasten a new ATH. It will prolong it.

Not necessarily. Long, slow downtrend is more detrimental than a two-weeks crash, consolidation and beginning of a new rally. That being said, I am a newbie and might (very possibly) be wrong.

In my defense, check april 2013 vs 2011 "spurts".
He doesn't want to hear that. He is a greedy bastard who is on the verge of becoming a millionaire and only wants to see the price increase to solidify that.

We just had a crash and consolidation. Maybe we need  another one. I don't know, but I don't want to see anybody get hurt, and nobody get's hurt if we only go up from here except the people waiting now for a lower price point with too much cash on the sidelines. I don't have a crystal ball and maybe waiting now is is good strategy, but it's good for Bitcoin if there's less volatility.
There aren't even enough people involved with bitcoin to even care what happens at this point. 95%+ of the population hasn't even thought about Bitcoin, let alone paying any attention to it. There is plenty of time. If anything, a slower growth is better to keep all the evil eyes off of it for a surprise attack. I know you are probably getting old and shit and are hoping you are worth millions before you have to spend those coins on a Rascal and urine bag, but damn, relax.

ok,  that was funny. Hey, you may be right. This is completely new territory for everybody. We're making history here. Just don't miss your shot waiting for the perfect entry point. My dad top-ticked the 2011 bubble perfectly, buying in at the worst possible time. It actually worked out though because I know him and he would have lost his nerve if he had waited. You have the opposite problem. It might not crash and you never get in.  If you get in now, worst case scenario is you lose a year or two before you're worth millions. (or we could all lose our asses, in which case the whole point is moot) You're young. A year or two seems llike a long time but it's not.



103. Post 4716967 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 24, 2014, 09:27:33 PM
The number of coins is completely arbitrary. What matters is the value of your total stash. I once had a goal of 1000 coins and I alllllllmost reached it, but I'll never get that now and you know what? doesn't even matter.  It was just a nice round number. Something psychological. What matters is my daughter can have braces, a quincinera, a college education and a wedding some day. 

and a single bitcoin now WILL be worth millions if the multi-year log trend holds.  in only three to five years.
What are you talking about.

100 BTC and each BTC is worth $1 million -> 100 x $1 million = $100,000,000.

1 BTC and each BTC is worth $1 million -> 1 x $1 million = $1,000,000.

That is a difference of 100x - that is the difference between being able to start up a multimillion dollar business project and not being able to. That is the difference between being financially free and not. BTC is not going to $1 million in 5 years, it may go there within 10.

The more BTC, the more purchasing power and the sooner you reach that plateau of purchasing power where you no longer have to worry about spending everything you have to get to where you want to be. It is a HUGE difference. Its massive.

That is exactly my point... you want bitcoin to go up as soon as possible so you can buy some stuff (whatever a quincinera is and why you would want to waste BTC on it that you think are going to $1,000,000). I want to accumulate bitcoin so I can be in a position to produce stuff.

Sigh. ok Junior, read carefully:

1 BTC=~$800 now  ~1000% annual appreciation for the trend.

in one year 1 BTC=~$8,0000
two years 1BTC=~$80,000
three years 1BTC=~$800,000
Four years 1 BTC=~$8,000,000
Five years 1 BTC=~80,000,000

$80 mil is a position to produce stuff. Now this trend may slow down, but again, you're young.  You say you want to swing for the fences. Good. I'm like that too. Just don't strike out waiting for the perfect pitch.




104. Post 4717459 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 24, 2014, 09:44:00 PM
^Jesus!!! you think BTC is going to $80,000,000?

Either the technology will be adopted or it won't. It's basically a binary outcome. it's still a long shot, but it's a heluva lot more likely than it was three years ago.

do the math. What is Gold's market cap and what market share do you think Bitcoin will take?
What is VISA and Mastercard's market cap and what market share do you think Bitcoin will take?
and Western Union, Moneygram?
and Paypal?
and microtransactions?
and national currencies?
and SWIFT wire transfers? ACH?
stuff we haven't even thought of yet?




105. Post 4717638 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: delphic on January 24, 2014, 09:52:37 PM
The number of coins is completely arbitrary. What matters is the value of your total stash. I once had a goal of 1000 coins and I alllllllmost reached it, but I'll never get that now and you know what? doesn't even matter.  It was just a nice round number. Something psychological. What matters is my daughter can have braces, a quincinera, a college education and a wedding some day. 

and a single bitcoin now WILL be worth millions if the multi-year log trend holds.  in only three to five years.
What are you talking about.

100 BTC and each BTC is worth $1 million -> 100 x $1 million = $100,000,000.

1 BTC and each BTC is worth $1 million -> 1 x $1 million = $1,000,000.

That is a difference of 100x - that is the difference between being able to start up a multimillion dollar business project and not being able to. That is the difference between being financially free and not. BTC is not going to $1 million in 5 years, it may go there within 10.

The more BTC, the more purchasing power and the sooner you reach that plateau of purchasing power where you no longer have to worry about spending everything you have to get to where you want to be. It is a HUGE difference. Its massive.

That is exactly my point... you want bitcoin to go up as soon as possible so you can buy some stuff (whatever a quincinera is and why you would want to waste BTC on it that you think are going to $1,000,000). I want to accumulate bitcoin so I can be in a position to produce stuff.

Sigh. ok Junior, read carefully:

1 BTC=~$800 now  ~1000% annual appreciation for the trend.

in one year 1 BTC=~$8,0000
two years 1BTC=~$80,000
three years 1BTC=~$800,000
Four years 1 BTC=~$8,000,000
Five years 1 BTC=~80,000,000

$80 mil is a position to produce stuff. Now this trend may slow down, but again, you're young.  You say you want to swing for the fences. Good. I'm like that too. Just don't strike out waiting for the perfect pitch.

$80m x 12.3m Bitcoins (currently) = 12 x the entire sum of the GDPs of all the countries in the world. Or maybe you are on another planet.

$984 trillion is only a fraction of the world's derivatives market.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/03/worldwide-derivatives-market-estimated-as-big-as-1-2-quadrillion-as-banks-fight-efforts-to-rein-it-in.html



106. Post 4718111 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: aminorex on January 24, 2014, 10:26:35 PM
^Jesus!!! you think BTC is going to $80,000,000?

If 90% of BTC are consumed by reserve demand and 50% of the global GDP is denominated in bitcoin, we will see $80mm/btc.

You also have to consider that world GDP is growing exponentially and dollars are being debased at the same time.  $80mm may only buy a cheeseburger a decade from now!  It actually would've been a heluva bargain in Zimbabwe a few years back. I have a few $100,000,000,000 Zimbabwe bills that I bought on eBay. The world's reserve currency will probably be the last to fall, but hyperinflation is pretty much inevitable with fiat currencies. If the only weapon you have is a printing press, every problem looks like a liquidity problem.



107. Post 4718248 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 24, 2014, 10:30:46 PM
1 BTC=~$800 now  ~1000% annual appreciation for the trend.

in one year 1 BTC=~$8,0000
two years 1BTC=~$80,000
three years 1BTC=~$800,000
Four years 1 BTC=~$8,000,000
Five years 1 BTC=~80,000,000

$80 mil is a position to produce stuff. Now this trend may slow down, but again, you're young.  You say you want to swing for the fences. Good. I'm like that too. Just don't strike out waiting for the perfect pitch.

Um, you do realize that s-curves (like Bitcoin adoption) only increase exponentially on the approach to vertical, don't you?

Of course. ten years total before the adoption rate goes linear is certainly within the realm of possibility.But, c'mon, does it really matter? What's important is the amplitude of the virtical section.



108. Post 4718583 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: KFR on January 24, 2014, 10:28:37 PM
^Jesus!!! you think BTC is going to $80,000,000?

If 90% of BTC are consumed by reserve demand and 50% of the global GDP is denominated in bitcoin, we will see $80mm/btc.

Yup.  But that would be a very different world to the one we currently live in. Wink

That's the idea ;-)

Seriously, Bitcoin has the potential to do much more than merely replace national currencies. It has the potential to allow dramatically increased world productivity and wealth. The financial sector is currently sucking off around 8% of global economic activity. Bitcoin could cut that in half.

There are more cars per capita now than there were horses per capita 150 years ago. This is because additional utility is produced at the margins. A more efficient disruptive technology can take more than 100% market share of the technology it replaces.



109. Post 4718935 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: kurious on January 24, 2014, 11:08:37 PM
We just had a crash and consolidation. Maybe we need  another one. I don't know, but I don't want to see anybody get hurt, and nobody get's hurt if we only go up from here except the people waiting now for a lower price point with too much cash on the sidelines. I don't have a crystal ball and maybe waiting now is is good strategy, but it's good for Bitcoin if there's less volatility.
The market doesn't care if people get hurt. And the market surely doesn't give a fuck what is good for bitcoin.

Comment of the day.   And any hope we will reach a new paradigm of 'less volatility' may not quite pan out.

I mean we haven't seen massive swings for oooh, it must be weeks now, right? Wink

I care and I'll be buying the whole way down if it goes that way. I'm part of the market too, ya know. I'll be doing it for the good of the network, but I'm gonna make a good amount of coin doing so. It's the incentives that make bitcoin almost indestructible.



110. Post 4721385 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on January 25, 2014, 01:04:25 AM
It's snowing here in southern Louisiana! It's always hotter than hell here. Expect single digits soon!

Edit: Caddy paid for with BTC Wink



Yeah, we have U.S. 90 shut down here in Morgan City. It's kinda funny. First time we've seen ice in four years and everybody's freaking out about it.



111. Post 4722313 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Pretty quiet out there.  Bulls and bears waiting for the other to move so as to catch opponents off balance.  Mexican standoff=merchants win=Bitcoin win!



112. Post 4722805 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on January 25, 2014, 03:59:57 AM
I don't get it. Where's Willy getting his USD? The first time around he used $10 million. He's not selling back the BTC or the gap wouldn't have increased to $30. He'd have to be an idiot to deposit USD into his account. The only explanation is he has $10 million + USD in his account. That's ridiculous.  Undecided

What's so ridiculous? Maybe an early adopter sold ~10,000 coins  at about ~1,000/BTC in a dark pool order, discovered his money was trapped, and now is painfully taking the only exit left. It's possible.



113. Post 4723012 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Public service Announcement: Today's panic sell-off has been canceled due to lack of interest. Tomorrow's panic buy will continue as scheduled. Thank you. That is all.



114. Post 4723397 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on January 25, 2014, 05:47:04 AM
Pretty quiet out there.  Bulls and bears waiting for the other to move so as to catch opponents off balance.  Mexican standoff=merchants win=Bitcoin win!

Great idea! Mexican Standoff Coin (MSC).

Hmmmm. No panic sellers. Who's gonna be the first bear to capitulate, close his short position and cut his loss. He'll be smarter than the average bear.



115. Post 4723791 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Wow, somebody sold a few billion dollars woth of Stocks today. What do you think they'll going to do with alllll those profits? let 'em sit in depreciating fiat? Hey, didn't that bitcoin center just open up on Wall Street?



116. Post 4724537 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: stylin on January 25, 2014, 07:22:47 AM
Wow, somebody sold a few billion dollars woth of Stocks today. What do you think they'll going to do with alllll those profits? let 'em sit in depreciating fiat? Hey, didn't that bitcoin center just open up on Wall Street?

Do you think we are still in a bull stock market?

That's just semantics. Has there been a 20% drop from the peak? I don't think so but I don't follow it that closely anymore. What is relevant is that just a tiny "taper" a small reduction in the amount of fiat that the central bank is counterfeiting, has triggered this pullback. The economy is drowning in a sea of debt and need a constant morphine drip of "liquidity" to keep going. If the market drops far enough, we know (because they've done it so many times before) they will increase the money printing with all of the price inflation that entails. It will happen. They've told us in advance that they will do it again.  Ironically, this will very likely fuel another bitcoin bubble because although they can control the fiat money supply, they cannot control where that money flows to. Anyone who can see the writing on the wall can extrapolate the end game of hyperinflation.  The best hedges against hyperinflation are precious metals and bitcoin.

The smart money is going into bitcoin. The timing of the flows is unknown and unknowable, but it's coming.



117. Post 4727057 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

OMG, it's Saturday and nobody's panicked yet- time to throw around some FUD! 
Yeah, Gox sucks, but we've known that for a while and it's priced in. What's gonna happen if this correction doesn't come? All you bastards sitting in fiat are gonna scramble for the same coins. First one to break loses the least. Who's it gonna be?



118. Post 4727166 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: TERA on January 25, 2014, 11:43:13 AM
OMG, it's Saturday and nobody's panicked yet- time to throw around some FUD! 
Yeah, Gox sucks, but we've known that for a while and it's priced in. What's gonna happen if this correction doesn't come? All you bastards sitting in fiat are gonna scramble for the same coins. First one to break loses the least. Who's it gonna be?
If all the MACDs go up then I buy - simple. There's a very limited potential impact. Certainly not a "loss", since I've sold at $1000 and rebought at $450-$650 and then sold again at $1000 multiple times now.

Momentum traders increase volatility. They are parasites. I love taking their money.



119. Post 4727324 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: kwest on January 25, 2014, 11:47:24 AM
I can recommend the Bitcoinium app for Android.. I use it to easily view the orderbooks (color coded to see how big the walls are) and keep track of prices across exchanges.

Screenshot of Stamp orderbook:
http://i.imgur.com/z59xMLL.jpg

Oooh, that 315 ask wall at $800 is scary. it couldn't possibly move or vanish. Never happens.



120. Post 4727571 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: TERA on January 25, 2014, 11:58:07 AM
OMG, it's Saturday and nobody's panicked yet- time to throw around some FUD! 
Yeah, Gox sucks, but we've known that for a while and it's priced in. What's gonna happen if this correction doesn't come? All you bastards sitting in fiat are gonna scramble for the same coins. First one to break loses the least. Who's it gonna be?
If all the MACDs go up then I buy - simple. There's a very limited potential impact. Certainly not a "loss", since I've sold at $1000 and rebought at $450-$650 and then sold again at $1000 multiple times now.

What do you mean by *all* macd's?
Not all MACDs sorry. Let me restate this: At this point if 1D and 4H went up on Huobi I would probably give up and by back without waiting for a drop. Now if there IS a drop then I won't use 1D but instead I will use 4H or even 1H depending on the severity of the drop.

lol Those other moving averages don't mean nothin, right?



121. Post 4727665 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: mellowyellow on January 25, 2014, 12:15:45 PM
OMG, it's Saturday and nobody's panicked yet- time to throw around some FUD! 
Yeah, Gox sucks, but we've known that for a while and it's priced in.

yes, but that was a problem withdrawing fiat - now people are complaining they can't withdraw btc either.

Sorry, also not new. I got 31 coins stuck over there myself I haven't been able to access for a year. Just think of all those one way ATMs now putting buy side pressure on the market. APIs for employees to receive paychecks in BTC. Major retailers announcing every day they accept bitcoin. Wall Street Licking it's lips. How cheap is cheap you gotta be asking yourself.



122. Post 4727690 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: TERA on January 25, 2014, 12:19:13 PM
OMG, it's Saturday and nobody's panicked yet- time to throw around some FUD!  
Yeah, Gox sucks, but we've known that for a while and it's priced in. What's gonna happen if this correction doesn't come? All you bastards sitting in fiat are gonna scramble for the same coins. First one to break loses the least. Who's it gonna be?
If all the MACDs go up then I buy - simple. There's a very limited potential impact. Certainly not a "loss", since I've sold at $1000 and rebought at $450-$650 and then sold again at $1000 multiple times now.

What do you mean by *all* macd's?
Not all MACDs sorry. Let me restate this: At this point if 1D and 4H went up on Huobi I would probably give up and by back without waiting for a drop. Now if there IS a drop then I won't use 1D but instead I will use 4H or even 1H depending on the severity of the drop.

lol Those other moving averages don't mean nothin, right?
When I'm trading altcoins or daytrading bitcoin crashes like Dec 17 then the 15min and 5min are important. But when bitcoin has barely moved for 2 weeks, then they aren't. Less volatility = longer timeframes.

oh, so the 100D, 1M- you don't watch these. I see.



123. Post 4729332 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: seldon on January 25, 2014, 01:43:31 PM
So is it completely impossible to get any fiat out of Gox? 170$ difference is insane

For non-Americans it is possible, just takes time. Not the biggest Fan of Gox, but the amount of FUD out here is impressive

It WAS possible. $170 differential may be an indicator that it's no longer the case. Any reports of recent successful fiat withdrawals? Or ANY withdrawals? I pulled 2BTC out about a week ago. No problems.




124. Post 4729507 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: TERA on January 25, 2014, 12:30:16 PM

Like I said less volatility = longer timeframes which means more volatility = shorter timeframes. Bitcoin is extremely volatile a 1D scale which warrants playing 1D at the very least. There is never a time when btc is stable enough to warrant playing a timeframe as big as 100D. Only playing 100D would mean a lot of missed opportunities to easily take advantage of the volatility on smaller scales.

Not too volatile today, maybe move those MacDs out a time frame or two, eh?




125. Post 4739779 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: Marbit on January 25, 2014, 11:01:38 PM
zipzap news is big. wonder when we'll actually see that in the states. (i know there is an estimate)

It is in the states. QVC up the street is affiliated, among others. Here comes the boom.



126. Post 4739929 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Keep in mind people, were on a four year logarithmic up trend of 1000%/year, when we hit the bottom elbow of the technology adoption S curve, it's going to go straight up and anyone sitting in fiat risks missing it just to get a few cheap coins.



127. Post 4742790 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 26, 2014, 03:00:07 AM
Keep in mind people, were on a four year logarithmic up trend of 1000%/year, when we hit the bottom elbow of the technology adoption S curve, it's going to go straight up and anyone sitting in fiat risks missing it just to get a few cheap coins.
It doesn't really go vertical literally. Its just that the rate of increase is not linear, there can still be ups and downs through the "vertical", just not large ones.

maybe maybe not. the point is, you risk missing the train. The longer you wait to get back on, the more expensive the bitcoins.



128. Post 4752009 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

CHOO CHOOOOOO!!!



129. Post 4752530 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

MMMM. Bear meat is delicious.  Cheesy



130. Post 4752816 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

You guys do realize how thinly traded this market is, right? The real whales are hodling. 



131. Post 4760055 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: GaliX on January 26, 2014, 07:54:35 PM
Just as expected, the market is crashing just as we get more confirmed bad news out of China.

This article is silly.  Really it is.

better it's shit.

If I was Chinese, I'd get as much money to the exchanges as I possibly could while there's still time. After the door shuts, bitcoin will be much harder to get, which will drive the price up.

I think FUD is a Chinese word for "opportunity".



132. Post 4766161 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

There is a high probability that Gox will be rescued, bought out or bailed out the way smaller exchanges were rescued in the past, but what is clear now is that Mark is running it into the ground.  it still claims to be the world's largest exchage on it's home page, for Chrissakes.  This is obviously, undeniably, verifiably false and does great harm to their credibility.



133. Post 4767032 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat on January 27, 2014, 02:12:57 AM
if bitcoin dies, i'm holding the bag, i dont give a shit, these coins have sentimental value to me  Grin


just no intrinsic value  Wink

Bitcoin is based on Austrian economics and praxeology. In Austrian economics, there is no such thing as "intrinsic value."  All value is derived from PERCEIVED use and future use.
If praxeology is valid, and the success of Bitcoin so far indicates that it is, intrinsic value will carry the same economic weight as "blessed" or "cursed".



134. Post 4767574 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 27, 2014, 02:46:48 AM
if bitcoin dies, i'm holding the bag, i dont give a shit, these coins have sentimental value to me  Grin


Now, you know that I'm a nay-sayer on a lot of the topics that come up in this subforum, so to be consistent ... I don't think that bitcoin dies.  It could get very sick and fall prey to panic so that it seems on the verge of death, but not complete oblivion.

There is value to the protocol and the blockchain.  There has to be value for the miners to continue.  Have more faith, but don't count on untold riches either.

I know that.... all i'm saying is i will be a bitcoin market participant forever, no matter what happens.

and on that note, i'm going to try and get some sleep!

good night everyone don't let the FUD get to you.

No way! I'LL be holding the bag. The one who dies with the most bitcoin wins!  



135. Post 4767818 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 27, 2014, 03:40:27 AM
If this happens to a well-established British bank

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barings_Bank#1995_collapse

why would it not happen in an unregulated, unaudited exchange?

It couldn't happen unless the exchange was operating as a fractional reserve.



136. Post 4768328 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

http://www.bitcoiniacs.com/


Lol. They had to shut down the buying option.

If it's easier to sell bitcoin than buy it, what does that tell you? There are far more buyers than sellers. otherwise they could just buy and sell the same coins over and over.
This is bullish. They claim it's getting harder to buy on bitstamp, where they reload at. interesting. Of course they could buy my bitcoins if they were desperate enough, but my markup would be a little higher than theirs.



137. Post 4768511 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat on January 27, 2014, 04:44:00 AM
http://www.bitcoiniacs.com/


Lol. They had to shut down the buying option.

If it's easier to sell bitcoin than buy it, what does that tell you? There are far more buyers than sellers. otherwise they could just buy and sell the same coins over and over.
This is bullish. They claim it's getting harder to buy on bitstamp, where they reload at. interesting. Of course they could buy my bitcoins if they were desperate enough, but my markup would be a little higher than theirs.

bitsimple.com if you need to buy (or sell).

WAY too big of a spread between buying and selling. I can buy cheaper and sell higher on coinbase. I can sell higher on localcoins for cash. Maybe for very large orders, this would be better, but I'm not at that level yet.



138. Post 4769548 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: TERA on January 27, 2014, 06:33:27 AM
I still have this impression that a wall is at least 10,000btc. Lol

That's not a wall. That's a pizza.



139. Post 4770977 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: molecular on January 27, 2014, 08:36:06 AM
Speaking of stabbing people, which we weren't, what ever happened to the gazillion wall street bucks that were waiting to pour onto the exchanges after Jan 1?

You mean the ETFs? They are not set up yet.

Nah. Back in December all the rage was to talk about all the wall street money that was going into the exchanges.

Already in?

Winlevoss Trust is being vetted by the SEC. Bitcoin Investment Trust on Second Market is open for business, but that's not an exchange most institutional investors are allowed to trade in.



140. Post 4781264 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

dammit, somebody got my cheap coins. You take one morning off...



141. Post 4787212 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: aminorex on January 27, 2014, 10:41:51 PM
stuffing my pockets

me too, Bro! Weeeeeee! cheap coins!!



142. Post 4787497 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on January 27, 2014, 11:38:33 PM
I think we will see sub 700$... My buy order is at 705$ (stamp).

going the other direction for now. Hope you don't miss your shot.



143. Post 4788594 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: TERA on January 28, 2014, 12:46:50 AM

I'm waiting for the bull to say "we're still in stealth phase".

I live in a town of 12,000 where only about a dozen people have heard of it and I'm the only one who owns any. Yeah, we're still in the stealth phase.



144. Post 4788826 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: Holliday on January 28, 2014, 01:20:44 AM

I'm waiting for the bull to say "we're still in stealth phase".

I live in a town of 12,000 where only about a dozen people have heard of it and I'm the only one who owns any. Yeah, we're still in the stealth phase.
You're thinking of a best case sceanrio in which Bitcoin becomes a massively adopted global phenomenon where every person has an interest in using it. But this graph is not intended to show success cases where something because a legitimate successful enterprise. It is intended to show ponzi schemes or things that fail or become unuseful (or not all that it was hyped up to be).

How many times does the graph have to be wrong before people stop posting it? I've been seeing it since 2011.

I imagine after the second elbow on the technology adoption "S" curve. Sooooo, a few more years minimum.



145. Post 4788960 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Geez, I caught that falling knife at almost the exact bottom. Of course if it crashes again, I'm doubling down. Not bad for a guy who thought a MacD was a hamburger a few days ago.



146. Post 4789432 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on January 28, 2014, 01:57:26 AM
That's the sound of the Bears, slowly going back to their cages and closing the door.

Are there any non extremist on this thread? We fall $100, then we bounce back up a little and thats the sound of bears going back to their cages? LOL

Everyone is either screaming single digits or CCMF, without a sound piece of evidence (or a clue what is going on).

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of Bitcoin is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of coins is no virtue!~ Barry Bitwater



147. Post 4792111 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: TERA on January 28, 2014, 06:46:00 AM
On the other hand, the volume on btce and bitstamp is actually relatively high for this month, so we might see another nice little choo choo bulltrap to $800 or so.

Unless the people who are buying are long-term hodlers, in which case it's a bear trap.



148. Post 4792287 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: TERA on January 28, 2014, 06:52:28 AM
On the other hand, the volume on btce and bitstamp is actually relatively high for this month, so we might see another nice little choo choo bulltrap to $800 or so.

Unless the people who are buying are long-term hodlers, in which case it's a bear trap.
Even if those people hodl, additional new coins can enter the market or get unhodled by different people.

hodlers hodl. That's why they're called "hodlers".  It could go back down, but people looking at a four year log trend line are not going to sell. Nobody knows how much liquidity is soaked up by hodlers until the next parabolic move up. I've seen it too many times. If I was a power player, this is exactly the kind of dip I'd be looking for.



149. Post 4792491 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on January 28, 2014, 07:11:34 AM
On the other hand, the volume on btce and bitstamp is actually relatively high for this month, so we might see another nice little choo choo bulltrap to $800 or so.

Unless the people who are buying are long-term hodlers, in which case it's a bear trap.
Even if those people hodl, additional new coins can enter the market or get unhodled by different people.

I think a large portion of the new joiners are becoming hodlers. Why not, the others in the past have experienced good returns for patience. Not everyone is a day trader or should even think about trying it so buy and hold is the simplest strategy for a total newbie. Or buy bitcoin to spend online and each time buy an extra %5-15 btc based of the purchases price in fiat as a mean to hedge against its deflationary aspect.

I think those sitting on large amounts from early days are hedging now, perhaps btc > gold or btc > fiat > gold, whatever satisfies said investor. Most people don't look at the actual price rises now being smaller then what occurred during $.30 -> $32 or $12 to $266.

People who bought and held from those periods are still able to sell and hedge their bets... and smart people don't keep all their eggs in one basket, so in turn the rise in value of a bitcoin forces them to hedge the position appropriately, not saying that you can't go full bitcoin with your wealth...there are people who'd bet it all on red for the chance to double up, but we have to expect some selling pressure during any steep rise to offset hedging etc.


Obviously you are right, but most people are by nature herd animals who bet the trend. It's the interplay between the smart money and the lemmings that give us market swings. And in this market, the smart money guys take there profits in Bitcoin, not fiat.



150. Post 4793489 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on January 28, 2014, 07:47:05 AM

Obviously you are right, but most people are by nature herd animals who bet the trend. It's the interplay between the smart money and the lemmings that give us market swings. And in this market, the smart money guys take there profits in Bitcoin, not fiat.

I still think a large portion of people are hedging 25%-50% out of btc when they see a rise of 10x or greater of their buy in price, not everyone but I'd lean to a majority as in 50.01%.

If I were to have acquired a large enough amount of bitcoin earlier I'd reinvest a fair bit of those gains into properties and reinvest the profits of those properties into bitcoin. Not to mention I will get this opportunity most likely by June of this year.

 there aren't many lemmings in bitcoin yet comparatively, I know lemmings they still think this is a big ponzi.

That's way too big a hedge, IMHO. A hedge is a bet you hope you lose, like life insurance. I hedge 10% the same way stock investors typically hedge 5-10% in precious metals.
this market has had three rallies of more than 10X, but the proportional increase is going down for each successive rally.



151. Post 4794357 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on January 28, 2014, 09:13:07 AM

Obviously you are right, but most people are by nature herd animals who bet the trend. It's the interplay between the smart money and the lemmings that give us market swings. And in this market, the smart money guys take there profits in Bitcoin, not fiat.

I still think a large portion of people are hedging 25%-50% out of btc when they see a rise of 10x or greater of their buy in price, not everyone but I'd lean to a majority as in 50.01%.

If I were to have acquired a large enough amount of bitcoin earlier I'd reinvest a fair bit of those gains into properties and reinvest the profits of those properties into bitcoin. Not to mention I will get this opportunity most likely by June of this year.

 there aren't many lemmings in bitcoin yet comparatively, I know lemmings they still think this is a big ponzi.

That's way too big a hedge, IMHO. A hedge is a bet you hope you lose, like life insurance. I hedge 10% the same way stock investors typically hedge 5-10% in precious metals.
this market has had three rallies of more than 10X, but the proportional increase is going down for each successive rally.

I guess in reality it depends how well diversified one person is to begin with, and how they accumulated bitcoin. As someone young with few assets, but no debts I do look at it as benefit to owning btc and being almost all in, however if they went up 10x in value, from my avg or median buy in price I would probably sell 10-25% to begin to diversify.


That seems about right, but I'd keep some of that liquid in case a crash presents another buying opportunity.



152. Post 4795323 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Seeing some action on coinbase/stamp. The rumors of bitcoin's death have been greatly exaggerated.



153. Post 4795427 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: TERA on January 28, 2014, 11:22:21 AM
Here we go again another recovery to $820 BS and then all the trains and moons come out. Surely this one will be it.

Hopefully It'll tech some of the lemmings not to join the stampede every time some fresh FUD gets slung.  Or I'll keep taking their money. I'm good either way.



154. Post 4805558 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 28, 2014, 08:21:33 PM
Does anyone have a fucking clue wtf these women are talking about?

where is the cute asian girl from the foundation, I need something to watch.
I kind of like what Annie Wilkes suggested. She said the government should just have the public sign-off that they are aware of the nature and risks of crypto-currencies and leave it at that.

The problem though with women, is that when you involve them in anything they take that as validation that they know what they are talking about and start spouting-off all sorts of firm but nonsensical positions and ideas.

That's because for women, feelings determine reality and not the other way around.



155. Post 4805655 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: kurious on January 28, 2014, 09:14:15 PM
After all that - the price went down...?

Ho hum...  All the fud about arrests and stuff 'on the eve of the hearing' and then it was just... normal, vaguely informed - and boring.  Then the price goes down.

buy the rumor. sell the news.



156. Post 4806919 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: fotosonics on January 28, 2014, 09:24:22 PM


This is the way I see it. Support for hodl policy.

I think you may have it backwards. The government, any government, is essentially an engine for driving money to the special interests. They do that through taxation and regulation to get distributed costs and concentrated benefits. Bankers may be a special interest group, but we are a more concentrated and therefore more special group. For bankers, it is far more cost effective to hedge against a bitcoin takeover by buying a small stake in it than it is to fight us with largely ineffective prohibitions and regulations. Most bankers who even know about bitcoin think it is a joke or a fad. The banksters who see it as a threat are not numerous enough to fight it and don't want to do it if their fellow bankers are going to free ride on their efforts. So they hedge and join us. The other bankers won't realize what a disruptive technology it is until it's too late. they are the Tower records and blockbuster video owners of the financial world.



157. Post 4807323 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: kurious on January 28, 2014, 10:31:54 PM

I think you may have it backwards. The government, any government, is essentially an engine for driving money to the special interests. They do that through taxation and regulation to get distributed costs and concentrated benefits. Bankers may be a special interest group, but we are a more concentrated and therefore more special group. For bankers, it is far more cost effective to hedge against a bitcoin takeover by buying a small stake in it than it is to fight us with largely ineffective prohibitions and regulations. Most bankers who even know about bitcoin think it is a joke or a fad. The banksters who see it as a threat are not numerous enough to fight it and don't want to do it if their fellow bankers are going to free ride on their efforts. So they hedge and join us. The other bankers won't realize what a disruptive technology it is until it's too late. they are the Tower records and blockbuster video owners of the financial world.

I used to work in the music business - it was unreal how it resisted downloads, until it was too late and sank their entire business model.  

After fighting and slagging off Napster et al, Steve Jobs came along and took over 25% of the entire music business at a stroke - and it was game over.

They never saw it coming, refused to.  

Their business model is going to change regardless of whatever else they do. You can't uninvent new technology. If I was a bankster, I would try to pull a Steve Jobs (Steve Job?) using my existing market leverage while I still had it. The first bankster to break from the pack wins. Or they all lose and someone else just takes over their entire market. Bitcoin is coming. My bank closed today because of the weather. WTF?? the weather? seriously?

Bitcoin today is like the Internet before the World Wide Web. We don't even have our mass adoption app yet. We have email where we can message a few thousand other nerds.  Overstock, Coinbase and Bitfinex are like Usenet, telnet and gopher. Official approval is like when America Online, Compuserve and Prodigy opened their internet portals. Still waiting for our Mozilla Browser.



158. Post 4807437 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on January 28, 2014, 10:36:14 PM
Its generally true. Its why women flip their moods so often and are never satisfied. Its why they say "you can never win an argument with a women" - because she is never arguing logic and facts.

Oh come on, kind of generalising here, methinks - please don't scare whatever females might still be bothering to check in here away...?
Hence, the use of the phrase "Its generally true". For most women in most situations this is true, but in professional situations women are generally able to pull it together.

lol and all men are dicks, and ignorant to their arrogance...your reiteration of said statements sadly makes me believe Women are equally correct in assuming that...all in all every person I have ever communicated and interacted with dealt with things differently, there we're similarities, but very rarely did they coincide with sex. Either way my shit anecdotal at best. Just think your short sighted trying to categorize most women to fit that terrible stereotype.

Stereotypes become stereotypes because they are generally accurate. I don't have the resources to judge everyone on the planet individually so I play the probabilities and take short cuts. Sometimes it bites me but most of the time I come out ahead. I don't consider it a flaw that women are illogical. it's a feature. If they were logical, they wouldn't be women, just men with the wrong genitalia. It's not bad for a woman to be ruled by emotions anymore than it's bad for my dog to chase cars instead of drive them. Still I don't let my dog drive, even if some dog somewhere is an excellent driver. (yes, this is hyperbole. Chill the fuck out)



159. Post 4807821 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: oda.krell on January 28, 2014, 10:54:40 PM
Its generally true. Its why women flip their moods so often and are never satisfied. Its why they say "you can never win an argument with a women" - because she is never arguing logic and facts.

Oh come on, kind of generalising here, methinks - please don't scare whatever females might still be bothering to check in here away...?
Hence, the use of the phrase "Its generally true". For most women in most situations this is true, but in professional situations women are generally able to pull it together.

BitcointalkWhere 'dumb as a brick' and 'probably rich' don't have to be mutually exclusive.

That pretty much describes all actresses and supermodels. I don't care as long as they are hot looking. I don't care how good my bodyguard can drive. Don't care how touch my chef is, don't care how well my chauffeur can cook, and I don't care how reasonable my women are. If they are trainable, that's good enough.

The women who like me consider my arrogance confidence. The women who don't, consider my humility lack of confidence. It's all perception to them. I have become much more successful with the ladies after figuring this out.

Now, back to our regularly scheduled reading of the tea leaves and chicken entrails.



160. Post 4808064 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: Vigil on January 28, 2014, 11:12:44 PM
BitcointalkWhere nerds believe that upholding politically correct male-female quality jargon and their bitcoin riches will one day get them laid.

15 years later....

BitcointalkWhere nerds who lost their bitcoin fortunes to their divorce settlement with their lusting ex-wives hang out and reminisce on the 'good ole days'.

LOL. Lot of white knights here in for a rude awakening. It's not what you make, it's what you keep, Lads.



161. Post 4808223 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: oda.krell on January 28, 2014, 11:30:01 PM
BitcointalkWhere nerds believe that upholding politically correct male-female quality jargon and their bitcoin riches will one day get them laid.

15 years later....

BitcointalkWhere nerds who lost their bitcoin fortunes to their divorce settlement with their lusting ex-wives hang out and reminisce on the 'good ole days'.

What a bitter lonely little man you must be. Don't act all surprised, when all you do is fuck barflies, if it turns out they're not exactly Rosalind Franklin level intelligence wise.

It's kind of sad when you think about it... you had all the chances in the world to date women in your IQ range when you were at university.

Thinking about it some more, you probably didn't.

I'd rather date a hot airhead than some fat ugly genius. Pretty sure most other guys would too. I get all the intellectual stimulation I need from men. You know, the people who discover almost everything, build almost everything, win almost all the nobel prizes, fields medals, etc. Women are far better equipped to stimulate in other ways.



162. Post 4808543 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on January 28, 2014, 11:50:45 PM
Bank run = Buying BTC on Mtgox. As of yesterday, Mtgox had a 200 gap on other exchanges. Then it's dropped to 160 now. Why the sudden confidence in Mtgox if nothing's changed?

I'd get tired of paying $200 over market for btc pretty quickly.  I imagine whoever was taking the blockchain offramp either finished or got weary of having their pocket picked.

I am going to live in a world where it's like a countdown as gox and stamp come to a new origin point in which we set off for mercury from the moon.

That's why I left Mtgox. But in order to leave you have to increase the gap yourself or find a well-timed exit. Basically anyone who sold from 960 to 912 yesterday after the other 2 exchanges stopped dropping want to stay. But seeing as they orchestrated the dump, I can see why that is.

So why couldn't Mark be selling Mt.Gox's own coins or even his own personal stash, arbing (transferring the fiat) to stamp or somewhere else and transferring the coins back to FtGox to sell again? He could basically steal all the fiat deposits left at Gox without ever running out of bitcoin. How else could they continue to operate? Who in their right mind in transferring fiat to Gox now? Even if you thought you could get fiat out, nobody would want to buy at those prices.



163. Post 4808785 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on January 29, 2014, 12:15:32 AM
https://www.mtgox.com/press_release_20140114.html

Gox's most recent statement is awfully suspicious... Almost as if Mark knows he is under investigation for assisting Silk Road vendors.

Relevant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignorantia_juris_non_excusat

Good luck mark&gox.

*edit*

proudhon, can you confirm this?

The response is corpus dilecti, which is the principle that there are two elements to every crime 1) the harm done by an actor and 2) the knowledge or willful ignorance that harm could be done by said action.  This is why insanity is a defense. or in Mark's case, stupidity.



164. Post 4808892 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 29, 2014, 12:21:32 AM
Who in their right mind in transferring fiat to Gox now?

Unfortunately, many novice bitcoin owners will choose to sell their BTC at MtGOX because (a) it seems to offer the best price, by far; and (b) it is still cited in the news, blogs, and chart sites as one of the main exchanges. 

read more carefully. Many would-be arbitragers have sent bitcoin to gox, but nobody would send or is sending USD or fiat to Gox. All it takes is ONE arbitrager to drain the entire fiat account totals left on Gox  by selling bitcoin there, transferring the fiat to another exchange, buying bitcoin on the other exchange at lower prices, transferring the bitcoin back to Gox to sell at higher prices, rinse and repeat. Everyone including me is buying bitcoin at whatever price we can get to transfer to another exchange and sell there to cut our losses.



165. Post 4809063 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: TERA on January 29, 2014, 12:30:42 AM
Bulls made a valiant effort today with that freakish low-volume spike to $810 but could not prevent the confirmed downtrend.



Nope. I sold at $800 to reload in case bears wanted to give me more coins. I'm prolly gonna get bit eventually for trading this churn, but I'll never lose money, jst end up with too many dollars and not enough coin. Too many dollars. So sad. maybe I'll cry.  Good thing I got that cold wallet to cheer me up.



166. Post 4809223 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on January 29, 2014, 12:49:53 AM
Who in their right mind in transferring fiat to Gox now?

Unfortunately, many novice bitcoin owners will choose to sell their BTC at MtGOX because (a) it seems to offer the best price, by far; and (b) it is still cited in the news, blogs, and chart sites as one of the main exchanges. 

read more carefully. Many would-be arbitragers have sent bitcoin to gox, but nobody would send or is sending USD or fiat to Gox. All it takes is ONE arbitrager to drain the entire fiat account totals left on Gox  by selling bitcoin there, transferring the fiat to another exchange, buying bitcoin on the other exchange at lower prices, transferring the bitcoin back to Gox to sell at higher prices, rinse and repeat. Everyone including me is buying bitcoin at whatever price we can get to transfer to another exchange and sell there to cut our losses.

What? You're saying someone would market order dump BTC at that outrageous price and get stuck with Mtgox fiat. If that was going to happen, it would have happened long ago. That doesn't make any sense. You can't transfer Mtgox fiat to another exchange easily. Mtgox has no problem getting fiat. It has BTC which they can sell.

Geez, c'mon. Pay attention. I can't get fiat out of Gox. You can't get fiat out of Gox, but if ONE PERSON can get fiat out of Gox, they can get ALL the fiat out of Gox.



167. Post 4809424 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on January 29, 2014, 01:05:00 AM

There are people who can get fiat out of Gox - Japanese. But it's not consistent enough to do any major arbitrage unless yesterday was what was happening.

really? Name one. One fucking person who has had a successful fiat withdrawal this year. Cuz that bastard's got my money.



168. Post 4809699 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: Frankie on January 29, 2014, 01:30:07 AM

There are people who can get fiat out of Gox - Japanese. But it's not consistent enough to do any major arbitrage unless yesterday was what was happening.

really? Name one. One fucking person who has had a successful fiat withdrawal this year. Cuz that bastard's got my money.
Here are some, but even JPY is way backed up (which is not normal):
 
I am a Japan resident. Posted a withdrawal on the 5th of January, was in my account 9 business days later.

You can find me in the epic bitching thread saying as much.
Requested 1/7 withdraw processed today 1/28.   Waiting on a 1/10.

Thank you. That's informative. Perhaps it's the Japanese government who is facilitating this theft for the benefit of its citizens. If so, they are killing a golden goose.



169. Post 4810255 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on January 29, 2014, 02:00:33 AM
Thank you. That's informative. Perhaps it's the Japanese government who is facilitating this theft for the benefit of its citizens. If so, they are killing a golden goose.
maybe their capital controls are different then other countries

That's not it. It's obvious U.S. banks are reluctant to deal with Gox, but there's probably more to the story. I think it's likely that the Feds in the U.S. are leaning on Mark to reveal his entire customer database so that they can systematically track down every silk road customer and merchant with a digital paper trail. Every MtGox customer who used the silk road without tumbling their funds through a bitcoin mixer are possibly going to get tracked down. The Feds want to seize the MtGox funds of Silk Road users, but until they know for sure who they are, they are preventing any U.S. withdrawals of fiat. They probably want to freeze the whole exchange to catch these people, but the Japanese government won't let them for national sovereignty reasons. So the Feds stop at the farthest point they can control, the wire xfers to U.S. Banks.  

Just a theory.




170. Post 4810441 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 29, 2014, 02:31:15 AM
The Feds want to seize the MtGox funds of Silk Road users

They already did that, didn't they?  http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/23/4651926/us-government-seized-5-million-from-bitcoin-behemoth-mt-gox

In any case, MtGOX is a Japanese company, so transferring Yen to Japanese banks is obviously much easier and faster than sending them to other countries.

For the same reason, they can be sued by a wronged Japanese client in Japan far more easily and cheaply than by a foreigner located in another country.

yes and no. They seized those funds under the pretext that Mt. Gox didn't register as a licensed money transmitter even though there was no clear guidance that such a license was necessary at the time. The real reason was I believe because they wanted to put the squeeze on Mark to pressure him to aid in their Silk Road investigation.  These kinds of ham-fisted police tactics are common and it's we, the honest law-abiding users who get caught in the crossfire.



171. Post 4810607 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 29, 2014, 02:43:24 AM
If anyone wants to pay my legal fees I'd gladly sue Gox for you in Japan.

Is that even possible? Here in Brazil at least, one cannot sue someone for damages done to a third person.  I bet that there is a Latin term for that...


How ironic that in almost every criminal as opposed to civil trial, the government is doing exactly that.



172. Post 4813220 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Where's da bears? Thought you'd get those cheap coins? Sorry, I got 'em first. Go ahead, short again.

 I drink your milkshake.



173. Post 4813592 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: dgarcia on January 29, 2014, 07:42:42 AM
Where's da bears? Thought you'd get those cheap coins? Sorry, I got 'em first. Go ahead, short again.

 I drink your milkshake.

Wrong question.

Where da bulls? Where is a small new top? Only a teeny-weeny new top?
835,00$ on stamp?

Or do we call a rebounce from 725 to 810 now freakin' bullish? Outraged bullish?

Look, I'm sorry if you can lose money faster than I can make it. It's like with women. Chase them and they run. But if you're in the right place at the right time, just wait around confidently and they will fight each other for you. Also, in both cases, IT HELPS TO HAVE SOME FUCKING COINS.  Wink






174. Post 4814077 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: dgarcia on January 29, 2014, 08:37:54 AM
Look, I'm sorry if you can lose money faster than I can make it.

This is the same prematured nonsense I heard from ShroomsKit. Why you Permabull-Guys are always thinking, if one is seeing a potencial bear market, he'll be so stupid and extreme waiting for uncertain, maybe never coming, big disasters(250 - 400). Instantly, these - you'll miss the train posting -. (or familiar meanings)

I sold at 810, rebought at 745, nevertheless potencial short/mid term bearmarket is resuming until we have leastwise a teeny-weeny new higher high.


I may be a permabull, but my magic 8 ball isn't any better than your tea leaves. I just know you're swimming against the stream. My four year log chart trumps your momentum chasing day/week charts. If it goes down, I'll be buying right with you, but only to add to my HUGE BIG GIANT STASH that I earned by not listening to chartists.

Momentum chasers are parasites that increase volatility and harm bitcoin adoption by merchants. I hate you assholes and I enjoy taking your money. Just try to make it more difficult. I like a challenge.



175. Post 4814640 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: dgarcia on January 29, 2014, 09:33:25 AM
Momentum chasers are parasites that increase volatility and harm bitcoin adoption by merchants.

This +1

And they are usually not as successful as they pretend. It's hard to beat randomness

That's true.

And even if succesful, usually it does rarely worth the stress. I'm only trading in rare cases: Last china crash, or as just mentioned, Bitinstant/Russia News.

I tried real Daytrading with 0/0 Loss/Win and a lot of stress.

betting against the trend is so much easier.



176. Post 4814840 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.00h):

Quote from: bangersdad on January 29, 2014, 09:55:30 AM
anybody used bitsimple? ive got some funds in my pp account - is it safe to use bitsimple?

ive used virwox before but you have to buy SLC then convert to BTC - so get charged alot of commission.

I haven't used bitsimple but Goat does and he has street cred. I don't like their exchange rates, but I hear they're fast. I have used virwox and they are established and take credit cards, but you have to pay two comissions to go through linden dollars and they charge you a fee for inactivity!!! I've paid almost four BTC in inactivity feeds for hodling.
if you buy there, don't keep them there unless you are actively trading.



177. Post 4825308 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: seldon on January 29, 2014, 08:18:28 PM
20% a day volatility? Thats just a pure lie

Volatility is going DOWN. Why? Because of us! The good speculators (us) take money from the bad speculators (momentum trading lemmings) who increase volatility.



178. Post 4825692 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: macsga on January 29, 2014, 08:42:33 PM
I like the lady. I find her HOT! I might get married to her (if I wasn't already married that is)... Grin The guy on the left makes me nervous. Have to lower the volume about 50% every time he talks.

Can't believe the chick is the one making the most intelligent remarks.  None of these panelists are what I would consider "experts." I could testify with more expertise, and I certainly don't consider myself an expert.



179. Post 4825913 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

fuck you, balding dude! Coinbase is undercapitalized?  31MM in VC capital on top of a massive horde of BTC in cold wallets?

also, it's as if nobody ever heard of future's contracts to hedge volatility?   Creating a market for futures is what these hearings are partly about, I thought.



180. Post 4826114 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: uvwvj on January 29, 2014, 09:02:39 PM
There it is the guy worked at the FED

DING DING DING!!  the laughable part about the integrity and reliability of the currency when the FED announced today that the counterfeiting will continue until prices stabilize.
QEternity!!!  



181. Post 4826151 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: Holliday on January 29, 2014, 09:06:08 PM
We need bankers involved so that people can trust it!

WTF?


Yeah, this is getting surreal.  



182. Post 4826399 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Who invited those panelists? It's like having a meteorology panel with a couple of rain-dancing indians on it. Still reeling from the claim that coinbase is undercapitalized. They clearly don't understand CB's business model. They take almost no risk and charge me 1% fee in both directions. Got to be just raking in money.



183. Post 4826678 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: David M on January 29, 2014, 09:06:51 PM
"It has to walk and talk like bankers".

Yes he said it. (An Ex Federal Reserve employee)

Just like email has to walk and talk like a post office.  This video will come back to haunt that guy.  unfucking believable.



184. Post 4826794 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: Holliday on January 29, 2014, 09:31:30 PM
So why are you all so angry. I thought your main intention is that BTC will be used as a curreny. What is your problem if the Bitcoin price would 1$ or 50$.
Why does it have to be Bitcoin and not another cryptocurrnecy? I thought it´s all bout the protocol and it´s possibilities. Maybe Google will use the Protocol, so what.
In the end you would have won. (Of course not if you hodl Bitcoin  Cheesy Cheesy)

Who is angry?

We're not angry. We're just shocked that these "experts" don't even have a cliff notes understanding of what a distributed peer-to-peer proof-of-work cryptocurrency really is. You ca't fucking ban tumblers, for example. It's impossible to enforce. YOU don't understand it either if you think Google or centrally controlled entity can use the protocol. it's distributed peer-to-peer. by definition Google can't do it. They can only embrace it.



185. Post 4826888 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: empowering on January 29, 2014, 09:36:27 PM
There it is the guy worked at the FED

haha she'd like to keep her money in a safe institution.. bail ins coming this year biatch!


yeah un-fucking-believable..

derivatives? say wha?

and what was that? a coat of regulatory disclipline ? trust?  Jesus are we even talking about the same planet here?

Funny how I was expecting more of a hatchet job from the law enforcement guys, than the academia economist crowd...

Those two guys pretty much swallowed the feds handbook and both were intentionally missing key points or are both pretty high on the autistic spectrum especially
Mr Bean on the left- my guess is they do not like change.

Amazing. Brought to you from the guys that gave us the 2008 meltdown that we still haven't recovered from and the bail-outs that we'll be paying for forever.



186. Post 4827828 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: empowering on January 29, 2014, 10:18:46 PM
the market is not acting favorably to these events

i assume the official chain bitcoin ban  coming soon is of gr8 concern still

To be honest. TA is bearish as hell for days/weeks. That hearing was way worse than even the bears expected. It´s time to leave the hodl strategy. China and russia rumours are just lurking behind the corner...



You must have been watching a different hearing..the worst of it was the economic hitman, and they are probably all sad because it was Bennies last meeting today: (   Much sad, much print, no taper though... and soon the lady will continue his work... from these hearings I am expecting nothing too enlightened but I do not see them coming down hard, they will focus on the "entry and exit ramps" exchanges etc, and I suspect it will not be too bothersome, and infact will act as an impetus to Bitcoins growth and adoption and the rate at which wally street will get on board... Bitlicense is going to be like a red rag to a Wallstreet Bull, and hopefully they will not drag their feet too long on this.....

As for Hodl or not to Hodl? I will be buying the dips, and I see some of the alts are starting to have a bit of a wobble too... but I see no good reason not to hodl and aquire more and hodl.

Full hodl ahead captn' Aye aye!

Yeah, even the three bears panel were mentioning $10,000 coins. Just got back from the bank to deposit some more bear ammo.



187. Post 4828324 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

anybody youtube the morning hearings? missed 'em.



188. Post 4828458 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: kwest on January 29, 2014, 10:59:46 PM
anybody youtube the morning hearings? missed 'em.

It's archived here:

http://www.totalwebcasting.com/view/?id=nysdfs

thanks!



189. Post 4831191 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: TERA on January 30, 2014, 01:42:31 AM
i've been selling coins.  Tongue

risk management....

but i still very bullish on the future.
Anyone in bitcoin a few years ago is rich now. So...
Anyone in bitcoin now will be rich in a few years. no worries  Cheesy
Will anyone who buys bitcoin in a few years be rich in another few years? I'm curious as to how long this recurisve logic will go on. Will bitcoin expand infinitely and receive massive adoption by aliens in distant galaxies?

Nobody knows exactly, but I have an idea. Bitcoin, as our friend Mr. Antonopolis likes to say, is not just money for the internet. Bitcoin is the internet of money.  Bitcoin will follow the technology adoption S curve along a similar time frame as the internet itself was adopted. this means over four years or so before the adoption rate slows to close to linear from the logarithmic. we have about a million users in the U.S. now and I estimate this will grow to about 300 million in five years, which by that time will be about 75% of the US population. Of course this is global, so total adoption at the logarithmic (or super logarithmic) rate may be longer or shorter.
1 million people this year
5 million next year
25 million the year after that
125 million In 2017,
and then in 2018, the second elbow- but this is for any adoption.
The amount of use by each individual will increase on average over that time as well. For example, I first bought a home computer in 1992 and connected to the internet in '93. Now I have two desktops, two laptops, a netbook and a smart phone. Then I connected to the 'net for less than an hour a day and now I'm wired in for about twelve hours on average. Bitcoin use and value can increase for over a decade at geometrical rates without reaching saturation. Doesn't mean it will, but it might.


This is a very rough prediction.  (plus or minus 200%)  



190. Post 4831357 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: shmadz on January 30, 2014, 02:14:39 AM
Just got home, not gonna bother catching up with the last 30 pages of probable nonsense,

But I just watched the first segment of the first panel today, and sorry for the serious but I'd like if some of you could offer an opinion on the following.

Cyrus R. Vance, the very first person to speak, chooses to start with a case of money laundering, of course. Money laundering is the catch phrase and it's designed to put a negative image on bitcoin. They will repeat it again and again when asked about bitcoin.

The interesting thing is that they were laundering fiat dollars acquired from the theft of credit card information, using western express. This crime can't even happen with bitcoin. There is no credit card information to steal in the first place.

I think the reason they are going to try to vilify bitcoin and try to regulate the shit out of it so that they can maintain their monopoly on the money laundering business.  


What do you think?

I disagree. They see another cash cow like the dot com boom coming and they want a slice.



191. Post 4833241 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

This is pretty funny.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-01-29/difference-between-gold-and-bitcoin-explained-elliotts-paul-singer

in other words, "don't invest your money in these new-fangled automobiles. Horses have stood the test of time." this from a guy managing a 23.3 billion dollar horse farm.

Talk your book, much?



192. Post 4833385 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat on January 30, 2014, 05:52:06 AM
BTC CHina apparently restored direct bank deposits:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1wipty/btc_china_enabling_direct_deposits/

One of Winlewoss brothers confirmed it's a real.
unless this is a hoax

it came from reddit, what do you think?

50 50?

Uh, it came from a "John Winklevoss"?? long lost triplet?



193. Post 4833888 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

What happened at the Wells Fargo Summit?

http://national.wellsfargobank.com/VirtualCurrency




194. Post 4834386 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

We're getting some dippage on BTC-e and stamp.  I might get to go bear hunting after all.



195. Post 4834468 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Fairly big dump of BTC-e, other exchanges are slowly starting to follow... right into the panda bear trap.  crashing like a china in a bull shop.



196. Post 4834553 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

$757/BTC and still dropping. I'm licking my lips.



197. Post 4834566 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 30, 2014, 08:03:56 AM
$757/BTC and still dropping. I'm licking my lips.

spoke too soon. bouncing. Stamp didn't take the bait...yet.



198. Post 4834580 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: DaRude on January 30, 2014, 08:05:21 AM
Did i miss something? Whats up with a 1k sell at bearstamp?

they're just following BTC-e a little bit. The action's in China right now.



199. Post 4834708 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: TERA on January 30, 2014, 08:07:23 AM
All hail btce your new market leader.

What's the deal? Huobi isn't reacting at all. If this was about the Chinese bank's halting cash transfers, they would be reacting too, I imagine. Maybe the party boys are coming after Bobby. I think their banking system is so upfucked that they might already be looking for scapegoats. yeah, that's my completely unfounded rumor. Remember, you heard it here first!



200. Post 4834814 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: jsteelbeam on January 30, 2014, 08:29:37 AM
wtf is this all about?

The Jan 31st crash is nigh!

Seriously, though.  EVERYBODY is waiting for  $500 coins.  If your cost per coin is under $400, you should sell and let the crash finally happen, so the cash on the sidelines can rush into the market.  New ATH can then finally be had.  

yeah, we take advice from newbies. That's how we made all our money. GTFO.



201. Post 4834909 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

That's it? That's all the bears can do? Try more FUD, see if that works.



202. Post 4834949 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: jsteelbeam on January 30, 2014, 08:39:05 AM
wtf is this all about?

The Jan 31st crash is nigh!

Seriously, though.  EVERYBODY is waiting for  $500 coins.  If your cost per coin is under $400, you should sell and let the crash finally happen, so the cash on the sidelines can rush into the market.  New ATH can then finally be had.  

yeah, we take advice from newbies. That's how we made all our money. GTFO.

Yes, I'm a forum stalker, not a poster, but anyone who has followed the posts knows that a large portion of the sideline cash is waiting for that scenario.  Doesnt make sense from a financial perspective to not let that cash come back into the market and cause the panic buying to new ATH. 

Except I am more than a day trader. That's only how I hedge. A dramatic drop would slow merchant adoption, which is more important in the long term than a new ATH soon. We're creating a new payment system, not a casino.



203. Post 4835062 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: runam0k on January 30, 2014, 08:47:38 AM
Except I am more than a day trader. That's only how I hedge. A dramatic drop would slow merchant adoption, which is more important in the long term than a new ATH soon. We're creating a new payment system, not a casino.
Merchants don't fucking care, they're using BitPay.

Those of us with substantial holdings will not deplete them by buying stuff at a low exchange rate. We didn't get where we are by buying high and spending low, so price needs to go up gradually and then we'll share with merchants. Overstock bitcoin sales went down because the exchange rate went down. If it goes up, more bitcoiners will buy stuff there and then more merchants will jump on board.



204. Post 4835135 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: magicmexican on January 30, 2014, 08:53:15 AM
true reason for the drop - http://www.nasdaq.com/article/bitcoin-drops-3-as-emerging-market-concerns-ease-cm321692

Cheesy

Interesting. I can see why distress in emerging markets would be good for Bitcoin, and I predict a whole lot more distress to come. Not happy about that even if it will be good for my bottom line. Lotta people gonna get hurt. They'll get less hurt if they buy some bitcoin.



205. Post 4835246 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: runam0k on January 30, 2014, 09:07:53 AM
Those of us with substantial holdings will not deplete them by buying stuff at a low exchange rate. We didn't get where we are by buying high and spending low, so price needs to go up gradually and then we'll share with merchants. Overstock bitcoin sales went down because the exchange rate went down. If it goes up, more bitcoiners will buy stuff there and then more merchants will jump on board.
If Overstock sales went down it's because the initial rush of bitcoin buyers has passed.

And anyone with substantial holdings of BTC almost certainly acquired it more than a few months ago (ie when BTC was < $150). In the context of the gains made, the exchange rate has barely moved.

I started buying when it was less than $10/BTC and I still am going to wait. You seem to think it was easy money. It wasn't. Everybody was screaming at us to sell when it jumped to $50, $100, $200, etc.  We held. and we held through the crashes too. Easy money spends easy. Hard money is hard to part with.



206. Post 4835475 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: RicePicker on January 30, 2014, 09:22:37 AM
Those of us with substantial holdings will not deplete them by buying stuff at a low exchange rate. We didn't get where we are by buying high and spending low, so price needs to go up gradually and then we'll share with merchants. Overstock bitcoin sales went down because the exchange rate went down. If it goes up, more bitcoiners will buy stuff there and then more merchants will jump on board.
If Overstock sales went down it's because the initial rush of bitcoin buyers has passed.

And anyone with substantial holdings of BTC almost certainly acquired it more than a few months ago (ie when BTC was < $150). In the context of the gains made, the exchange rate has barely moved.

I started buying when it was less than $10/BTC and I still am going to wait. You seem to think it was easy money. It wasn't. Everybody was screaming at us to sell when it jumped to $50, $100, $200, etc.  We held. and we held through the crashes too. Easy money spends easy. Hard money is hard to part with.

I was around the time when bitcoin was $32 and $2. The fact that you continue telling people to hold at $700-$800 compared to when you bought at $10 is ridiculous. I like to think back at when I mined an average of 3 coins with my 5770 in a week and I thought that was slow. I hold a good amount of Bitcoins from when it was $2-$20 and I believe that at these prices bitcoins are way overvalued for what they are capable of currently. Back then I was actually willing to spend my coins to buy things. I still have my DDR2 memory that cost 10BTC and thinking about how much I would have if I held on to them till now. Telling people to invest thousands of dollars in BTC when I was mining these coins when I was 17 makes BTC like such a joke.  

I mostly hold because it's going up. It might go down first, but it's going up and I think even you know it. Market timing is not something everybody should attempt. I'm pretty good at it and even I use less than 5% of my holdings to play around with.  Investors are forward thinking. The utility value today is only one piece of the price. It's also the implied future value.  When the shit hits the fan in Turkey, Argentina or wherever, liquidity is gonna dry up fast and I want to be in a position to supply it.

Just wondering, where's all those coin you mined now? Still got em? hodling? or did you sell too early?  You sold at the top and now you wanna buy 'em back?



207. Post 4835524 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on January 30, 2014, 09:34:12 AM

you seem short sighted,

Totally short sighted. That is why I have been holding on too these coins for the past 3 years...

so you just.. posted about how the coins are over valued.. and the main idea shared in your paragraph is a sentiment that coins shouldn't be held. contradictory much? expert troll

yeah, this guy's hodling and criticizing me for telling people to hodl. so many trolls...



208. Post 4835773 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Economics and trading are two different things, Junior.  The fact that you consider it play money may be why you have less than a quarter of your original stack. Hope you enjoy that DD2 memory. Your brain memory isn't apparently doing you much good.



209. Post 4836048 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: runam0k on January 30, 2014, 10:02:21 AM
I started buying when it was less than $10/BTC and I still am going to wait. You seem to think it was easy money. It wasn't. Everybody was screaming at us to sell when it jumped to $50, $100, $200, etc.  We held. and we held through the crashes too. Easy money spends easy. Hard money is hard to part with.
But you just said people had stopped spending because rates had gone down. And that merchants would now think twice. So are you saying $900 is the magic number for you and others to start spending? Or are you holding regardless?

I have nothing against you holding, btw.

That's close to MY magic number, but not everybody's. I try to stabilize prices by buying BTC on the way down and selling it on the way up to reduce volatility. Making money is just how I keep score on how good I am doing.  It's the opposite strategy of the momentum traders and it can be very profitable if you buy and sell the right amounts at the right times. and they haven't stopped spending. They've slowed down. We're aiming at moving targets.



210. Post 4836169 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: RicePicker on January 30, 2014, 10:09:00 AM
Economics and trading are two different things, Junior.  The fact that you consider it play money may be why you have less than a quarter of your original stack. Hope you enjoy that DD2 memory. Your brain memory isn't apparently doing you much good.

That is nice to hear. I am pretty sure when I am at your age I will be sitting on an internet forum arguing with someone 20 years younger than him about how much money you have made.

Kid, you can learn from people like me or you can learn the hard way. It's your choice. An ego is an extremely expensive luxury to maintain. Fiat is a terrible store of value but it's liquid, so if you need to keep some around to maximize your options, fine. Just remember most people work for their money but smart people let their money work for them.





211. Post 4836585 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: runam0k on January 30, 2014, 10:56:19 AM
But in the next 24-36 months, bitcoin is somewhere between 10k-50k. It simply has to be. The scale at which the entities getting involved now operate scale wise, bitcoin will be forced there. And 17 year olds that mined this useless Internet money will have their minds blown.
To be fair, you're taking a bet that e.g. the US government won't ban the use of Bitcoin in the US. Look at India and China, for example. Bans can be quite effective. If the US government banned Bitcoin tomorrow - not beyond the realm of possibility given the US Treasury Secretary's recent remarks and the difficulties regulators and the IRS will have addressing Bitcoin - it simply will not have the chance to grow to the size you want it to be.

I'm long Bitcoin too, but it's a gamble nonetheless.

Not that much of a gamble. If the USG bans bitcoin, the FBI will have to destroy their private keys and that would be very bullish. It would still be traded here, just underground. An outright ban is very unlikely, even if regulation tightens to the point of scaring institutional investors and certain whales off. I think that is unlikely as well. What's more likely is that mining difficulty will increase substantially due to some new hardware coming on line and the price will adjust up accordingly. More merchants will come online. QE will continue or even increase, one or more national currencies will hyperinflate, new applications for the blockchain will be developed, client software and apps will be released, and we'll all wish we bought more of those overvalued bitcoins.



212. Post 4837454 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: runam0k on January 30, 2014, 11:56:17 AM
It is absolutely beyond most realms of possibilities at this point.

Do you live in the US? It doesn't matter I suppose given how many people here are paranoid about our government, but the truth is the US doesn't go around banning technologies. And there is no indication they will ban bitcoin. They aren't banning gay marriage. They aren't banning bitcoin. The NY regulators lead these type of financial decisions in the US. And the hearings made it clear they will support bitcoin and bitcoin innovation. The US takes pride in being world leaders and bitcoin is no different.

It's happening. It's no longer if. It's when.
Well, I appreciate your confidence. Smiley

(I don't live in the US, FYI, but I am a US citizen paying US taxes.)

Gay marriage does not threaten TBTF banks or the government's control of money and taxes (unless you're a homophobe, in which case you might think it does Wink). That's a pretty important difference.

This is the same government that promptly squashed e-gold, etc. Right now, IMHO, they're starting to realise they can't effectively control or tax Bitcoin. What happens then is anybody's guess/gamble. Smiley

I think a healthy dose of mistrust towards the government and the banks is a good thing, but you're overdoing it here. We're not important enough to hate yet. By the time we are, it'll be too late for them.



213. Post 4839351 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: mellowyellow on January 30, 2014, 01:22:03 PM
Ye except poker is a job for a decent chunk of people playing on these sites. I myself have friends who were forced to move outside of US just to continue playing.

I just wanted to emphasise the fact that there is a big creation of wealth with bitcoin that other activities don't provide.

How? It's made some individuals wealthy, but only because other individuals have put money in, and those individuals are reliant on other new individuals putting money in to make their own returns. Bitcoin does not create money, it just moves it around. Only governments create money.

Bitcoin increases transactional efficiency, therefore in creates wealth or more accurately destroys less wealth than alternative forms of value transfer. There is a difference between wealth and money. Money is a representation of wealth, but by increasing the money supply, governments dilute the value of each unit of currency.



214. Post 4839505 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: Richy_T on January 30, 2014, 02:36:29 PM
I think the reason they are going to try to vilify bitcoin and try to regulate the shit out of it is so that they can maintain their monopoly on the money laundering business.  


They want their slice of the pie. Preferably a bigger slice than yours.

Government is a monopoly on force. They are little better than bandits.

Worse. Bandits don't expect you to be grateful, don't pretend to be acting in your best interest.



215. Post 4839645 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: SilverandBitcoins on January 30, 2014, 02:45:26 PM
Sorry if this is old, wish I could have watched this live, but at 34:15 (1st panel of day 2) that second law guy nearly slips up and uses the term crypto currency instead of the term he was told to use, "virtual currency"

Virtual currency is another catch phrase that they want to embed in the subconscious. Virtual currency is very different from crypto currency. Crypto is the term I would use to define a currency protected by cryptography, like bitcoin. Virtual is the term I would use to define Amazon bucks, or WoW gold, or USD; these are currencies that are centralized and controlled. Crypto currency is neither centralized, nor controlled, and I think that would scare them to death, if they only understood.

Yep. I think the endgame for them is probably a virtual dollar. No more hiding stacks of bills in the mattress. When they want to give you a haircut, they just press the button and bam, you're worth 80% of what you were.

That's a good argument for gold and silver.  I wonder how many posting here also invest in physical precious metals?

The U.S. Government stole most of the private gold held by Americans in 1933. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102 The precedent was set and they could easily do it again. Good luck trying to steal bitcoins. Private keys? What private keys? I lost/destroyed/exposed/ate them. Good luck hiding gold in a brain wallet.



216. Post 4840444 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: aminorex on January 30, 2014, 03:30:57 PM
This is correct. We need a name for this syndrome.

Coincidental template journalism.  Bloomberg syndrome.

Arbitrary correlation syndrome



217. Post 4841122 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: pietje on January 30, 2014, 04:08:00 PM
So any bears left? Or did they already started to panic buy?
Almost at 31st and huobi decided to start a rally Cheesy

looking like an endangered species. Nice little spike. let's see if it's got wings.



218. Post 4851883 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 31, 2014, 04:48:06 AM
click here for a lol your welcome

Yeah he was doing stuff like this in 2011 when it was $12/BTC and silver was $50/oz. if bitcoin hits $2,000, I expect him to either switch to full drink-the-cool-aid bull or for his head to explode.



219. Post 4854451 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: electronistul on January 31, 2014, 09:07:26 AM
Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see the BTC/USD go up at least 2x orders of magnitude, but my thought is that it's going nowhere. As long as BTC Chine keeps this wall up (and they can do this indefinitely), we're not going to see any locomotives around.
It's not going to go down either, at this moment it's pretty much locked @ 800 - ish.

Scenario:
Chinese selling on BTC China just to buy back cheaper @ Huobi or the other way around.
I feel like I am missing something here - but the difference between Ask @ 4850 and bid @ 4849.99 seems ridiculous !

It's too volatile. It's going nowhere. Gimme a break. It's 8X higher than it was three months ago. If consolidation takes another month or three, that's perfectly fine. and it will eventually go up when it becomes obvious to nearly everyone that is useful and has legs.  Honey badger don't just jump when you say "jump".



220. Post 4855683 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

So Bitcoin outperformed the stock market for January. Dollar strengthening relative to other currencies is prolly a reason why the BTC price hasn't gone up more in dollar terms.



221. Post 4865231 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: ampere9765 on January 31, 2014, 09:21:04 PM
I really dont like these Winklevossies. It seems they only try to make more money outta other people hard work and with daddy's money. They dont see the interest in bitcoin but only that grabbing 1% of it all would make them richer. They just pretend to be so smart but they just seems to get f**cking second if not last all the time.

ergo Zuckerberg ditched them
ergo Satoshi (and even FBI) got way more BTCs than they can ever dream of
ergo them ETF is far from opening.
ergo i wont consider a single news related to them as they mean nothing. Smiley

You sound jealous.
i sure am. but there is some cause for resentment when, all other things equal, they wouldnt have 1% of BTC if they werent simply born with silver spoons in hand. clearly many smaller holders got in long before them, but have far fewer coins not by virtue of foresight or skill, but by virtue of birth. in that sense, i have far less respect for the twins than i do for many of the smaller fish around since 2010.

Life ain't fair. Get over it. It's pretty unflattering for you to be envious when you yourself are likely to be very lucky in the birth lottery compared to most of Earth's population. Count your blessings. It'll make you a happier person.



222. Post 4865299 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: ampere9765 on January 31, 2014, 09:44:04 PM
i said all other things equal. meaning that those with the same foresight to invest in bitcoin have much smaller holdings by virtue only of the twins being born into wealth.

bullshit. They got their bitcoin money from their Facebook settlement, another case of their foresight.



223. Post 4865477 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 31, 2014, 11:00:03 PM
i said all other things equal. meaning that those with the same foresight to invest in bitcoin have much smaller holdings by virtue only of the twins being born into wealth.

bullshit. They got their bitcoin money from their Facebook settlement, another case of their foresight.

I was gonna post pretty much the same thing.

I hope one day they become richer than Zuckerberg. That would be poetic justice.



224. Post 4865839 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 31, 2014, 11:18:16 PM
What are folks planning on doing with themselves if there are months of sideways movements? Will you dabble in altcoins? Start a Bitcoin business? Drive yourself to despair trying to trade a $700-850 gap or just set an alarm for when there's an explosion?

I've realised that excitement in either direction is what's keeping me here more than financial gains, not that they're to be sniffed at.

I'm starting a business as a Bitcoin consultant. There's so much work to be done building the infrastructure.  



225. Post 4866511 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat on February 01, 2014, 12:14:51 AM



I'm starting a business as a Bitcoin consultant. There's so much work to be done building the infrastructure.  

Yeah, I thought about that too. But then I don't really know what to do, lol!

Basically, I just tell people what bitcoin is, correct misconceptions, how it works and what their options are. My focus is more on merchants than investor/speculators, because it's merchant adoption that will be the catalyst for mainstream adoption.



226. Post 4866707 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: Peter R on January 31, 2014, 11:41:30 PM
Price is generally sticky, it is due to human psychology, people are most happy to pay today what they paid yesterday. It was sticky at $1, $10, $20, $100 and now here, but the pressures building beneath remain relentless http://www.bitcoinpulse.com/ coinbase now at 10,000 wallets per day and blockchain.info ~6,000 per day

Eventually the building demand pressure overwhelms the stickiness and demand outstrips supply at the margin and then we need to re-adjust price to reflect the new reality that has built up in the time that the price has been stuck, hence the volatility. It is not going to be smooth climb up to to saturation level pricing because humans are human.


I agree with the dynamic you described above.

I would add that presently we have two forces at play:

-  new buyers who entered the market Nov-Jan, excited after learning about the potential of bitcoin, wanting to increase their positions (perhaps they initially invested only a couple hundred $ just to get their feet wet)

     VS

- people who are now sitting on large gains, waking up in a cold sweat in the middle of the night one night with the epiphany "hmm, I now have $100,000 worth of BTC and $5,000 of cash in the bank.  I believe more than ever in bitcoin, but perhaps I should diversify just in case."

Eventually the people sitting on large gains have diversified enough to sleep soundly, but the new buyers keep entering the market and buying and we get a new leg up...  


But the one thing I can't figure out is what caused the dip (see below) this last summer.  I believe a lot of people (myself included) think we will see something like this play out again.  But does anyone have a rational explanation for why this might have happened in the first place?  I remember this moment well: everyone on local bitcoins in Vancouver was sold out of coins (or asking ridiculous premiums) which I thought was odd (it was as though it was clear to everyone that the price was too low).



I wonder about that dip too. It may be hodlers who were forced to sell for cash flow reasons even though they believed the price was going to go up or remain stable.  This worries me a little bit, because I am a medium-sized hodler with negative cash flow. There's a finite amount of time I can hodle before I start to slowly drain my portfolio, and I don't think I'm alone.  Fortunately, I keep getting zero APR credit card applications in the mail, so chances are I can hodl out for over a year or two if necessary-but I'm not selling this time because I can always get a second job if I have to.

My guess is right now, there is more pressure on the bears in short positions who will slowly start to close out their short positions if the price continues to go sideways.



227. Post 4866805 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: bqxpd on February 01, 2014, 12:42:47 AM
But the one thing I can't figure out is what caused the dip (see below) this last summer.  I believe a lot of people (myself included) think we will see something like this play out again.  But does anyone have a rational explanation for why this might have happened in the first place?  I remember this moment well: everyone on local bitcoins in Vancouver was sold out of coins (or asking ridiculous premiums) which I thought was odd (it was as though it was clear to everyone that the price was too low).



Actually, there's no mystery about what caused that dip -- Gox officially suspended withdrawals on June 20th. The market began dropping immediately on the news as people speculated that Gox was going under. The price bottomed out at 66, bounced back at about the same rate it had fallen, then resumed the pre-news trend of meandering around 100 before ultimately heading upward and into the November rally.

Ok, that makes sense. I wasn't really following the day-to-day news during that period. Diversifications of exchanges is a very good development IMHO because MtGox was such a bottleneck and potential single point of failure. The beauty of the free market is that every problem is a potential entrepreneurial opportunity. Mark's incompetence as a CEO actually ended up helping the industry.



228. Post 4866968 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: MatTheCat on February 01, 2014, 12:57:33 AM

I'm starting a business as a Bitcoin consultant. There's so much work to be done building the infrastructure.  


A Bitcoin Consultant!?

But you are a Bitcoin Nutter and since I have became aware of you, you have been nothing but wrong.

I wish you all the best on your new venture but I think I shall pass on your services thankyou very much.

What was I ever wrong about? Can you provide any evidence of this assertion? I may be talking my book, but my book is doing just fine.



229. Post 4872275 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: TERA on February 01, 2014, 11:20:57 AM
Exchanges are having record low volume and prices are just floating up with no resistance.

you say that like it's a bad thing.



230. Post 4873531 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

now we're getting some volume!



231. Post 4883187 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 01, 2014, 03:58:01 PM
there really are patterns everywhere.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophenia
http://www.ted.com/talks/michael_shermer_the_pattern_behind_self_deception.html

pwned!!



232. Post 4885012 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat on February 02, 2014, 12:15:04 AM

One benefit of being a figurehead is you can unilaterally drive Bitcoin to da mooooooon!

i wonder if it would be helpful for the n koreans if they mined or used btc.

their accounts get closed like clockwork.

Pariah states would obviously benefit, but so would other national governments. Bitcoin could be an effective way to pay off spies and informants, evade trade sanctions, establish slush funds, etc. As for the N. Korean people, it may be the difference between starvation and survival.



233. Post 4885717 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Five red candle days, three days of churn, and then five green candle days. This indicates a sea change of liquidity. Last time this happened in September, there was a month and a half of very slow gains before the rocket took off. If this is another example of stealth transfer of coins from day tarders to hodlers, there is reason to believe that the time frame may be accelerated somewhat. Frequency of rallies increase as their amplitude decreases.



234. Post 4886014 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: TERA on February 02, 2014, 01:47:10 AM
Five red candle days, three days of churn, and then five green candle days. This indicates a sea change of liquidity. Last time this happened in September, there was a month and a half of very slow gains before the rocket took off. If this is another example of stealth transfer of coins from day tarders to hodlers, there is reason to believe that the time frame may be accelerated somewhat. Frequency of rallies increase as their amplitude decreases.
China

LOL. China is a "known unknown". To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, it's the unknown unknowns that may prove my analysis faulty. Plenty of us have fiat waiting to catch falling coins from the Middle Kingdom if they decide to give them to us.



235. Post 4887767 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on February 02, 2014, 04:40:27 AM
we will be at 830 by monday, and then, lol, then you fools shorting satoshi are gonna start saying things like " why is price going up Huh " " who's the moron buying  Angry "

Fiat Vs Crypto

wtf did you think was gonna happen!?

 Cool

CCMF

due to currency rates, 817 Bitstamp is 909cad : D ....cavirtex is still at 898cad Sad  but wait that means our coins are on discount, woo $11 off lol .. oh wait 3% fees bah!

I introduced a buddy who expressed interest in joining the hodlers club to the cad exchanges option and he gave the vault of satoshi a shot. I'll have to find out what the experience was like.

day 2 of the painful lack there of insta crash for the bears, slow squeeze on shorts.

Time is on the side of the bulls. Time is always on the side of the bulls, unless you're leveraged. There's no way to be a bear WITHOUT being leveraged (no naked shorts), so all I have to do is crack a beer and wait.  Cool



236. Post 4887994 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: empowering on February 02, 2014, 05:18:05 AM
Bitstamp

Upside breakout scenario.

We are flirting and have been bouncing around $820 and there seems to be some form of resistance here, it is a little sticky..trading sideways into a channel around $820


If we go continue to go up from here we may go from this $825 (ISH)  channel top we have been in trading sideways and go up to  $840 -$858 then there may be some resistance.

If we go up from there

$840- $858  then I think we could trade in-between there up to $880 -$885 and see more resistance, if we break that then it is set for hitting the $900 - this is a psychological resistance point..

If there is a break out and if we go past $900 and break $910 -$915 then it has a chance to go onto break $928 and from there maybe we see a real break for $945 - $970 - $991 + then things get interesting...

I see us going up , but ...

Downside scenario from this current channel I can see the possible resistance/support levels
$825
$817
$800 psychological
$775 ish
$757 ish
$749
$725
??

Edit.... or for now we see more of this sideways trading within a channel $775- $820  until something goes bump in the night.



Bitstamp

Starting point was $820/5  today at around 02:55:31 PM

I have laid out my upside possible resistance/pivots/supports from my original post for easier viewing.

If we break out from now or over the next few weeks or at least the next month
then from $820-$825 I see the following possible resistance/pivots/supports.
 
$840-$858
$858-$880
$880-900 ($900 psychological for USD)
$900-$910/5 (could be a psychological resistance level as also $908/10 = CNY5500)
$910-$928
$928-$945
$945-$970
$991 - (could be a psychological resistance level as also $990/1 ish = CNY5500)
$Cape Canaveral

Downside scenario from this current $820 - $825 channel I can see the possible supports/pivots/resistance

$825 (this price could also be a psychological support because $825= CNY4999.99)
$817 - We dipped down to here for quite some time a good few hours February 01, 2014, 09:32:01 PM now hovering on or around $817 within plus or minus $2ish- or CNY 50 short of CNY5000 $817 first acting as support then switching to resistance - within $2-3 but $817 is quite a specific number we have been pivoting on off for quite a few hours… not $833 or $823 or  $807 - but quite strongly pivoting around $817 (+- $2-3ish) ….quite interesting to see what happens…. next….,  if there is consolidation at this level then there should be a movement one way or other…  
$800 psychological
$800 - $775 ish
$775- $757 ish
$757- $749 ($740 = CNY4500)
??

EDIT:as I was writing this we just shot up to $823 on Bitstamp, lets see if it can hit $825 (CNY5000) and what it does if and when it does....
EDIT 21:44 PM: The price levels and pivots I have posted are actually based on Fibonacci retracement lines over two timescales, however a few of the numbers also coincide on several occasions with psychological resistance levels, but in CNY as I have noted in brackets, which is a curio)

$817 Still bouncing along this resistance line

This is an orderly climb. This is very good.



237. Post 4888981 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: nanobrain on February 02, 2014, 06:35:51 AM

Empowering, you shouldn't waste your time here (we just shout out CCMF and other nonsense)...get yourself over to
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400235.0;topicseen
Everyone is much more serious there and Risto gives out cigars n port along with a lengthy critique of where you are going wrong  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Wink



CCMF! w00t!



238. Post 4889753 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: F-bernanke on February 02, 2014, 08:46:13 AM
Ok, which chineze whale has the balls to push this sucker trough the 5k barrier.

it's 5004 on HooBoy.



239. Post 4890169 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: flynn on February 02, 2014, 09:32:46 AM
Huobi wan  goes to the (death) Moon ?

that's no moon...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVekNsgUqn4



240. Post 4890769 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on February 02, 2014, 10:26:44 AM
excellent timing.

Yeah... And here was me, looking forward to this week-end since December...

Might be a rare opportunity to observe Coinbase. It usually tracks Stamp, but what will it do with stamp down? Should be some way to calculate or at least estimate volume based on price movements with and without Bstamp up and running.



241. Post 4895924 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 02, 2014, 03:14:03 PM
Ah, distinctly I remember; it was in the bleak December,
And each dipping streak of ember brought the price through the floor;
And the sick and sad uncertain trending of that crimson curtain
Thrilled me - filled me with fantastic terrors never felt before.


That's good!



242. Post 4903392 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: KFR on February 02, 2014, 10:39:05 PM
Wow.  Such crash.  Doge hurtin' today.

 Shocked  Who could have possibly seen that comin'?



243. Post 4903706 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: bambou on February 03, 2014, 12:28:36 AM
Wow.  Such crash.  Doge hurtin' today.

All cryptocoins are brothers in fate, if one fails the others will suffer too.

Pure bitcoiners may rejoice in the demise of a competitor, but people out there will wonder: if Dogecoin crashed without warning or reason, why wouldn't Bitcoin too?


there was very good reason for the doge crash

Thanks, I suppose you mean this:

http://www.businessinsider.com/dogecoin-crashed-this-weekend-2013-12

So its price crashed because its popularity soared. That may be good news for Bitcoin indeed.



It's only dawning on the Dogecoiners now that 10,000 coin block rewards in perpetuity might not be enough to secure their blockchain if the price doesn't increase 50x in the next year.

this

so i guess it is also valid for bitcoin? there is still a huge margin for its popularity to soar Grin

Prices are determined by estimating discounted future value.  Supply of BTC will dry up. Supply of dogesh*t never will.



244. Post 4904111 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 03, 2014, 01:02:07 AM
Prices are determined by estimating discounted future value.  Supply of BTC will dry up. Supply of dogesh*t never will.

Er, um, but doesn't that imply that in the future everybody will use Dogecoin, no one will use Bitcoin?

That's what we used to call in Naval Nuclear Power School a GCE (gross conceptual error). Trade requires two parties. Few will want to trade something that's scarce for something that isn't.



245. Post 4904814 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: surfer43 on February 03, 2014, 02:30:01 AM
What will happen when the Seahawks win the Superbowl in a blowout (right now it is 43-8)?   Huh

people will be trading Broncos Superbowl Champions T shirts for dogecoin.



246. Post 4905445 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on February 03, 2014, 03:26:08 AM
So here we all are sitting around waiting for the Chinese to come back from holiday. 

It will result in the sheep panic selling as really anything does these days. Good news, bad news, it doesn't matter. Panic sell.
This will happen: the Chinese holiday is over! Omg sell!

Good time to accumulate coins then. Don't worry, they'll be panic buying soon enough.



247. Post 4905521 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: surfer43 on February 03, 2014, 03:58:59 AM
So here we all are sitting around waiting for the Chinese to come back from holiday.  .

It will result in the sheep panic selling as really anything does these days. Good news, bad news, it doesn't matter. Panic sell.
This will happen: the Chinese holiday is over! Omg sell!

Good time to accumulate coins then. Don't worry, they'll be panic buying soon enough.
You can only call it panic buying if they have believed the value will be much higher all along.
otherwise it is


They are panicking that the herd is leaving them behind. Doesn't matter where the herd is going. Safety in numbers (so they think)



248. Post 4905959 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 03, 2014, 04:21:50 AM

In the context of stocks, it does not seem to be useful to think of "the Apple stock market" or " the Google stock market", except when "market" is short for "supply and demand".

It seems more useful to think that there is just one stock market, where the stocks of all companies are traded together.  That's because traders can quickly sell one stock and buy another as they see fit.  New investment money that comes into one stock promptly "diffuses" to other stocks.  Thanks to arbitrage traders, one can even think of all stock exchanges of the world as a single market.

Methinks that the same is happening in the world of crypto-currency, with regard to both the exchanges proper and the support network.

The most reputable (or least disreputable?) crypto exchanges seem to be well connected by arbitrage, so that prices tend to rise and fall together.  Several already trade two or more crypto-coins, against each other and against national currencies.  Many traders already own and play with several types of crypto-coins at the same time.  So perhaps we should start thinking of "the crypto-coin market" instead of "the Bitcoin market", "the Litecoin market", etc.

As for the support network, it seems that many miners will direct their efforts to whatever crypto gives the best return at the moment.   So, even though the blockchains are independent, we should perhaps think of just one Crypto-Coin Network, that supports all cryptos according to usual cost/profit principles.

Does this make sense? 

Sure. We could easily create indexes similar to the DJIA or the S&P 500 which would gauge overall movements and be weighted by market cap. Kinda surprised someone hasn't done this yet. Whoever is first gets to name the index after himself!



249. Post 4906103 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: byronbb on February 03, 2014, 05:10:08 AM

Sure. We could easily create indexes similar to the DJIA or the S&P 500 which would gauge overall movements and be weighted by market cap. Kinda surprised someone hasn't done this yet. Whoever is first gets to name the index after himself!

Easily? How?

What to do is easy. How to do it is somebody else's problem. I don't care enough about alts to make the effort.



250. Post 4922222 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 04, 2014, 12:26:37 AM
you know the fact that poeple aren't dumping on the bad news from Russia, is very telling.
we've seen a overload of FUD this past month, and price is holding its own.
bitcoin is not some house of cards, that could topple over at any moment, thats for sure.
it use to feel like that, but now it feel likes bitcoin has passed the test, nothing can stop us now!
[/quote

Yeah, it's even holding on days when the stock market has serious sell-offs, alt coins crash, Japanese yen slips back into deflation, etc. Honey badger don't care!



251. Post 4922585 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on February 04, 2014, 12:57:32 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/government-likely-to-exhaust-debt-ceiling-options-soon-lew-warns/2014/02/03/88f66ac8-8ce0-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html

Looks like btc will hit 10,000 before march. If proudhon confirms.

The Debt ceiling will be raised. It always gets raised. The only other option is that they will eliminate the debt ceiling entirely. Money printers print. It's what they do.



252. Post 4924187 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: windjc on February 04, 2014, 03:27:23 AM
Looks like February is going to be another stale month in the bitcoin trading world. Hopefully fundamentals will continue to grow, but it looks like meanwhile the markets are just running in place and slightly downhill.

I am much looking forward to some guidelines from those NY regulators. The sooner the better.

Btw, you bears out there have to admit that the fight that 760-800 is giving you guys for the last month is pretty impressive. I don't know how much longer it can hold out, but DAMN, its been a thorn in your side, hasn't it? Yeah, you know it has Wink

the question is, how long cant the bears hold out? 



253. Post 4924617 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: Dalmar on February 04, 2014, 03:58:13 AM
Interesting chart:



It would be more interesting if it was accurate. The 2011 bubble was ~3000%  (from $1 to $32), the early 2013 bubble was ~1500% (from $13 to $260), and only the last rally was 600% (from $200 to $1200).  



254. Post 4924728 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: windjc on February 04, 2014, 04:21:27 AM
Interesting chart:



It would be more interesting if it was accurate. The 2011 bubble was ~3000%  (from $1 to $32), the early 2013 bubble was ~1500% (from $13 to $260), and only the last rally was 600% (from $200 to $1200).  

Yeah, I was too lazy to post this, but you're right. More crap charts from a bear.

If there is any trend at all with those 3 surges, its that bitcoin is becoming LESS VOLATILE with highs being a lower overall % and less % being lost after the upward swing.

and the interval between each rally is getting smaller!



255. Post 4925672 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: windjc on February 04, 2014, 04:27:07 AM

It would be more interesting if it was accurate. The 2011 bubble was ~3000%  (from $1 to $32), the early 2013 bubble was ~1500% (from $13 to $260), and only the last rally was 600% (from $200 to $1200).  

ahh, thanks for accuracy and context. I would be greatly appreciative if we could only go up by 300% this time? OK?

That would be great.

300% is a likely ballpark of where the next surge will take us. That's why I think its going to be a while before we are at 10k. I think its going to take maybe 4 or 5 more surges.

Like for a rough guess, not at all really serious:

700 ---> 2100 300% then
1500 ---> 3750 150% then
3000 ---> 5250 75% then
4500 ---> 6750 50% then
6000 ----> 9000 50% and so on...

I agree, that's more probable than another 10X spike, but as the surges are coming closer together, we're still only looking at another 12-24 months before the $10K mark.



256. Post 4937889 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: rjp55 on February 04, 2014, 05:42:17 PM
Long time lurker. Created account just to say that of all message boards I have come across Fonzie is the most obnoxious troll I have ever seen. I created an account just to ignore him. Well done sir.

LOL Welcome to the forum.



257. Post 4942363 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Bad scenario is if Stamp buys out Gox, bringing back the single point of failure risk. Circle.com has some heavy hitters behind it. I'd like to see a buy out that puts a big exchange in NYC just in time for the next round of counterfeiting by the Fed.



258. Post 4943302 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 05, 2014, 01:42:53 AM
Pray for a takeover
What would that mean?  

If an exchange's outstanding obligations (the sum of its client's account balances, plus pending bills etc.) are more than its assets (furniture, cash in bank, and coins in wallet), why would anyone want to buy it?

Same reason Hostess, Chrysler, or anybody else gets bought out. Brand awareness, the domain name, name recognition, technical talent (yeah, I know), the trade engine, existing licenses, merchantcontracts, contracts with other payment processors, etc. 



259. Post 4943691 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 05, 2014, 02:15:06 AM
If an exchange's outstanding obligations (the sum of its client's account balances, plus pending bills etc.) are more than its assets (furniture, cash in bank, and coins in wallet), why would anyone want to buy it?

Reputation (lol), contacts/customers and a platform that has been mostly proven and is up-and-running.

There may be buyers for their physical assets including computer hardware and software.  That may be worth a couple million US$ at most. However, no one will want to inherit their client accounts, since they are not assets but debts. I would guess that the sum of all account balances (coins and cash that they owe to their clients) is much more  than 100 million US$.  Do they have that much in their bank and wallet?

I have pennies in my account. If a credible operator took over, there would be tens of thousands in it. I am not alone by a long shot. We would be trading, generating commissions and fees. We only left because we had to. There is still a big demand for an exchange other than stamp that can handle big volume. it would be a tremendous opportunity for someone who could recapitalize Gox. Recapitalization will take only a few million. Gox could be a billion dollar company if the operator got his act together.



260. Post 4963201 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

thanks for helping me refill my pockets, Boys!



261. Post 4966125 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

That's it? Toothless bears can't move the price more than 2.5%? That's the problem with slinging FUD; Diminishing returns.  



262. Post 4968319 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Quote from: Shak on February 06, 2014, 07:40:54 AM
looks like a massive manipulation attempt.

first: 1500 dump on bitstamp, at the same time bitcointalk went down
it didn't crash the price

next: hack of bitfinex, 2000 dump on stamp


someone desperatily wants the price to plummet down to slaughter sheeps in the resulting panic

I agree. Hope you have fiat at the exchange. No sense in letting the bad guys get all the coins.



263. Post 4968408 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Quote from: TERA on February 06, 2014, 07:59:17 AM
The exchange shit is getting scary in general. I'm going to be looking for an opportunity where I am comfortable putting a certain amount of coins into cold storage and then take the rest of my fiat out and take all of my trading urges out in the stock market.

If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.



264. Post 4968593 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Quote from: Peter R on February 06, 2014, 08:15:52 AM
WTF is going on?


Panic sheep going omg sell! Just be happy. This just had to happen.

It would seem that the "panic sheep" haven't been selling.  Here's how I remember today:

- BitcoinTalk went down (DDoS?)
- Huge dump on BitStamp (1000+ BTC)
- Huge volume on Gox dropping the Gox premium dramatically.  Little correlation seen at the other exchanges.
- Apple pulls Blockchain.info app from AppStore
- Bitfinex goes buggy (hack?)
- Another huge dump of BitStamp (2000 BTC)

I'm surprised how well we're holding up.

When you've been through this a couple of times, you learn to recognize the buying opportunities.



265. Post 4969111 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Quote from: burple on February 06, 2014, 08:57:59 AM
I think I'm learning I panic bought at 760 to average down rather than panic sodl.

That's how you do it! It was only $760 for a second at Coinbase and I pulled the trigger, but the price changed back up before I could confirm, so I canceled. Good call (so far). Just keep buying all the way down and sell incrementally on the way back up. Soaking up volatility can be profitable!



266. Post 4969239 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Quote from: TERA on February 06, 2014, 09:06:24 AM
Luckily I was full fiat already (except my permanent cold storage allocation) so no need to panic hodl. But I did make some perfect "panic buys" (actually standing orders) on bfx and then bfx rolled them back. I can't even buy now on bfx if I want, and half of my money is over there. This is really turning me off to bitcoin trading. If I stalk the price for weeks and then cant even pounce when i finally get my opportunity... wtf. And if exchanges are having issues, bad liqudiity, and screwing people over, well, its starting to seem like more risk than reward. I'm pissed and worried now. I should just hodl some btc as a long term investment, and then go trade on the stock market where the only risk is making a bad trade and its my own fault. This is unless we can get some really good btc exchange in the US launched with good infrastructure, good security, and some protection of funds by US regulations, like a stock market.

I agree we need a good exchange in the U.S. or at least some quantum improvements in coinbase and campBX, but the stock market is going to be hurting for a while, until Janet Yellen cranks the printing press back up. You could try QQQ ultrashorts, but I would make sure you could get your money back in to BTC fast if we take another rocket ride. Good luck!



267. Post 4970296 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

So a five percent drop is all the bears can manage with the Apple news and bitfinex glitch, eh? Hell, we're still way outperforming the stock market for the year.



268. Post 4971761 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Why have so many people bought my coins at $900 and sold them back to me at $785?  The only trade better than that is shorting Apple stock.



269. Post 4984828 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

These bears are pretty weak. They claimed Bitcoin was done when it crashed to $3, when it crashed to $80 etc. Funny those bears aren't around anymore but we have this new generation saying the same shit and they think they are clever and original.  The bear markets are when you make your money, real money, crypto-not fiat. Being a herd animal is a valid survival strategy for most, but surviving isn't living. Being a cowboy on the edge of the heard on the verge of stampede, that's living.

If you believe in Bitcoin, hold your ground. Pick up some cheap coins when they are available. If you don't believe, it's ok. We'll take your coins. We don't need you, so vaio con Dios. The world needs losers or being a winner wouldn't mean anything.






270. Post 4985112 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 06, 2014, 11:49:42 PM
These bears are pretty weak. They claimed Bitcoin was done when it crashed to $3, when it crashed to $80 etc. Funny those bears aren't around anymore but we have this new generation saying the same shit and they think they are clever and original.  The bear markets are when you make your money, real money, crypto-not fiat. Being a herd animal is a valid survival strategy for most, but surviving isn't living. Being a cowboy on the edge of the heard on the verge of stampede, that's living.

If you believe in Bitcoin, hold your ground. Pick up some cheap coins when they are available. If you don't believe, it's ok. We'll take your coins. We don't need you, so vaio con Dios. The world needs losers or being a winner wouldn't mean anything.




losing and winning is subjective  Wink

the whole world is a zero sum game. some live. some die.

Every man dies. Not every man really lives.



271. Post 4987322 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 07, 2014, 02:02:15 AM
Some of you may have noticed that Thursday Feb/06 was a bit busier than the last few days.  Wink

Note that the total trade volume outside China surpassed that in China.  When was the last time that happened?

Note also that MtGOX was again the busiest of the non-Chinese exchanges.

Yes, I'd like to thank all our Chinese friends for giving us our coins back.  Grin



272. Post 4987636 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on February 07, 2014, 02:44:52 AM
Wasn't that a great crash? Why, it surely marked the beginning of the end for Bitcoin as we know it.

Never before has anything crashed that far, that fast. It was dizzying, the intensity of the capitulation all the way down to the mid-700s.

Those people who sold in the 700s sure know how to work the market. Yep.

This is why I am bewildered by those who complain that so many coins are in the hands of too few. Quit selling them back so cheap and maybe we'd spread 'em around more.



273. Post 5001073 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Quote from: humanitee on February 07, 2014, 05:05:50 PM
I'd like to add I only agree with this quote if you invest all, or near all you have. And that is the case for many "bulls" here.

How many have swollen balances and barely taken out any profits even though their balances grew 10, 100, 1000 fold?

my guess is very few, I cashed in some profits at all kinds of prices, and its no secret i'm very bullish, but i'm poor.... so that might have somthing to do with it.

Go big or go home

Once your initial investment is recouped it's remarkably easier to hold through it all. Source: me

+1



274. Post 5002713 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on February 07, 2014, 06:11:14 PM
Ok so it seems Gox is just going to be dead. Other exchanges are already getting ready to replace it from there.

-> http://www.coindesk.com/secondmarket-takes-first-step-to-becoming-us-exchange-with-new-seller-service/

Now this is big!!  Go SM!  Cool

It's not gonna happen overnight, but it would be a good idea to start accumulating now for when the Wall Street money starts coming in.



275. Post 5002831 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 07, 2014, 07:05:01 PM
Consider this plot of the BTC price at Huobi over the last 2.5 days:



Note that the volume plot at bottom is roughly mirrored on the price plot, as deviations from the almost straight trend line (in blue).

It is as if Huobi's clients wanted the price to be much lower, but are fighting against a "force" that wanted the price to follow that trendline.   So the price falls while they are active, but springs back towards the trendline when they slow down for lunch or go to bed.

What could be that mysterious force?

It does not seem to be the bulk of traders at the non-Chinese exchanges, since their activity rises and falls in sync with Huobi's volume -- that is,
on China's clock, rather than Canada's or Bulgaria's -- and they seem to be just following Huobi's price fluctuations. 


China is no longer driving this market. They had their chance to be leaders and they blew it. All they can do now is give us our coins back.



276. Post 5003475 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Quote from: windjc on February 07, 2014, 07:31:40 PM
I haven´t insulted anyone personally since i appeared on this forum, so this is an one time exception to whomever feels adressed.

HOW ABOUT U SUCK MY BIG FAT HAIRY DICK BECAUSE I WAS TOTALLY FUCKING RIGHT ALL THE TIME WITH MY POSITION.
SHORTING TO THE MAX. ULTIMATE PROFIT.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Now back to fun and troll mode. Cool

Ha. I guess some of my comments cut too close to the quick.

Yeah, you see some guy in a casino making it big and you just shake your head and laugh because you know he's going to give it all back if he plays long enough. The multi-year trend is still very much on track and the smart money just waits until the rest of the world catches up. Fast money comes fast and goes fast. Slow money sticks around.

You hear these voices every time: the market's gonna crash to $5! the market's gonna crash to $50!! the market's gonna crash to $500!!! The market's gonna crash to $5000!!!
and and often they are right, but it gets easier to shrug it off every year.



277. Post 5003591 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on February 07, 2014, 07:40:52 PM
Now that some of the buying power has been wiped out over the last 24 hours, expect a bigger weekend dip. You people are naive if you think we are in the clear now.

You think so? I was out partying last night and I missed the bottom, so I still got lot's of dry powder left. Also, I made a call to my whale friend who doesn't follow the market as closely as me. All this little dip did was wake up the big money.



278. Post 5007540 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

This is not the Gox observer thread. People just keep saying the same things over and over again.



279. Post 5010905 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Quote from: geri on February 08, 2014, 02:38:22 AM
I'll post it here one more time, so that you folks can also have sound sleep tonight.

http://coinbaseorders.com/


Who runs that website? It is not Coinbase, so whoever runs it has access to your account.



280. Post 5017236 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Here's a hypothesis I haven't heard before: The willybot was wasn't in in-house bot for Gox, but for Second Market, who used the "world's most established exchange" to buy in bulk. Most of the purchases were dark pool orders, but when that pool dried up, willy went to work. Now Gox is locked up and Second Market needs another source of bulk coins, so under the guise of a two-way exchange, they are actually buying on behalf of the bitcoin Investment Trust (BIT).

If anyone has made a purchase from 2nd Market, I will be happy to revise or discard this hypothesis, but I'd like some feedback either way. If I'm right, liquidity is being soaked up under the RADAR at a scale few are aware of.



281. Post 5017628 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Quote from: wilfried on February 08, 2014, 02:56:06 PM
Here's a hypothesis I haven't heard before: The willybot was wasn't in in-house bot for Gox, but for Second Market, who used the "world's most established exchange" to buy in bulk. Most of the purchases were dark pool orders, but when that pool dried up, willy went to work. Now Gox is locked up and Second Market needs another source of bulk coins, so under the guise of a two-way exchange, they are actually buying on behalf of the bitcoin Investment Trust (BIT).

If anyone has made a purchase from 2nd Market, I will be happy to revise or discard this hypothesis, but I'd like some feedback either way. If I'm right, liquidity is being soaked up under the RADAR at a scale few are aware of.

well, i thing for an exchange service it would be easier to use your inside knowledge to give you nice trading hints, so i dont really believe in that story - and if its true, how do they hide from the blockchain?

If BIT had an account at Gox, then those purchases would be off the blockchain until they withdrew them. Besides, blockchain analysis only works if you know who holds the keys to the public addresses.



282. Post 5017660 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Quote from: Dragonkiller on February 08, 2014, 03:00:26 PM
Here's a hypothesis I haven't heard before: The willybot was wasn't in in-house bot for Gox, but for Second Market, who used the "world's most established exchange" to buy in bulk. Most of the purchases were dark pool orders, but when that pool dried up, willy went to work. Now Gox is locked up and Second Market needs another source of bulk coins, so under the guise of a two-way exchange, they are actually buying on behalf of the bitcoin Investment Trust (BIT).

If anyone has made a purchase from 2nd Market, I will be happy to revise or discard this hypothesis, but I'd like some feedback either way. If I'm right, liquidity is being soaked up under the RADAR at a scale few are aware of.

Surely it would be easier for them to just move to Bitstamp?

unless the amount of coins in Stamp's dark pool is insufficient for their needs.



283. Post 5018206 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Quote from: Dragonkiller on February 08, 2014, 03:12:27 PM
Here's a hypothesis I haven't heard before: The willybot was wasn't in in-house bot for Gox, but for Second Market, who used the "world's most established exchange" to buy in bulk. Most of the purchases were dark pool orders, but when that pool dried up, willy went to work. Now Gox is locked up and Second Market needs another source of bulk coins, so under the guise of a two-way exchange, they are actually buying on behalf of the bitcoin Investment Trust (BIT).

If anyone has made a purchase from 2nd Market, I will be happy to revise or discard this hypothesis, but I'd like some feedback either way. If I'm right, liquidity is being soaked up under the RADAR at a scale few are aware of.

Surely it would be easier for them to just move to Bitstamp?

unless the amount of coins in Stamp's dark pool is insufficient for their needs.

Do we know for a fact dark pools exist?

Also does anyone know how many coins willy bought in total? I think it has bought a lot more than the BIT has reported over the past couple of months.

I always thought willy was a bot buying for a fund, although I'm not sure if it was for Second Market and I don't think Second Market is using the guise of an exchange to add to their trust (at least I don't think that is their primary goal; I think they're genuinely moving towards offering a reputable exchange).

Gox openly admits they have dark pools. So does CampBX, but I'm unsure about Stamp. Moving towards a reputable exchange and stocking up on coins for Hedge funds are not mutually exclusive. If I had to guess, Circle.com is going to open an exchange, so their may be competition in New York, which would mean downward pressure on trading fees. We ca only hope for now.



284. Post 5030900 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: 7thKingdom on February 09, 2014, 03:30:44 AM
Anyone know what's the deal is with Coinbase?  Their price is running about $25 over bitstamp right now, which is by far the furthest I've seen them spread.  Usually they're pegged right within a dollar or two of stamp as that's where they do all their orders from (at least, that was the common assumption).  Very odd that they've been sitting between 695-700 while stamp hovers around 670-675.

Anyone know what's going on there?

Obviously its Americans who are buying the fuck out of bitcoin. Kinda pisses me off that this spread reaches it's peak when I want to be buying and when I pulled the last of my coins out of Gox, the spread was the other way so I lose the spread every fucking time. But make no mistake, it's supply and demand and the yanks are coming.

Coinbase account holders have access to our bank accounts and can buy all we want and we're obviously buying the hell out of this drop. Once again, we have to bail out Europe and the rest of the world. Getting to be a habit. You ungrateful bastards can still suck it when the dollar fails and we still get to keep world reserve currency status!




285. Post 5031304 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on February 09, 2014, 06:44:20 AM
What is coinbase is the whale manipulating prices on chinese exchanges?

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Screw China. Wouldn't  be the first time we saved their asses from Japan.



286. Post 5031662 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: Zarathustra on February 09, 2014, 07:38:03 AM
Anyone know what's the deal is with Coinbase?  Their price is running about $25 over bitstamp right now, which is by far the furthest I've seen them spread.  Usually they're pegged right within a dollar or two of stamp as that's where they do all their orders from (at least, that was the common assumption).  Very odd that they've been sitting between 695-700 while stamp hovers around 670-675.

Anyone know what's going on there?

Obviously its Americans who are buying the fuck out of bitcoin. Kinda pisses me off that this spread reaches it's peak when I want to be buying and when I pulled the last of my coins out of Gox, the spread was the other way so I lose the spread every fucking time. But make no mistake, it's supply and demand and the yanks are coming.

Coinbase account holders have access to our bank accounts and can buy all we want and we're obviously buying the hell out of this drop. Once again, we have to bail out Europe and the rest of the world. Getting to be a habit. You ungrateful bastards can still suck it when the dollar fails and we still get to keep world reserve currency status!

In Europe, we have an exchange, we have ATMs and there are several European countries with greater adoption per capita. Check sourceforge.

Once again, we have to bail out Europe and the rest of the world.

Once again???

From Nazis, Commies, etc.  Those crosses on the cliffs over Normandy aren't just landscaping.



287. Post 5032075 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on February 09, 2014, 08:15:00 AM
Obviously its Americans who are buying the fuck out of bitcoin. Kinda pisses me off that this spread reaches it's peak when I want to be buying and when I pulled the last of my coins out of Gox, the spread was the other way so I lose the spread every fucking time. But make no mistake, it's supply and demand and the yanks are coming.

Coinbase account holders have access to our bank accounts and can buy all we want and we're obviously buying the hell out of this drop. Once again, we have to bail out Europe and the rest of the world. Getting to be a habit. You ungrateful bastards can still suck it when the dollar fails and we still get to keep world reserve currency status!

In Europe, we have an exchange, we have ATMs and there are several European countries with greater adoption per capita. Check sourceforge.

Once again, we have to bail out Europe and the rest of the world.

Once again???

From Nazis, Commies, etc.  Those crosses on the cliffs over Normandy aren't just landscaping.
But ummm you kindalike are europeans if we think about history? It's just a matter of how long you wanna go. Or are you saying you we're in normandy?
Your reasoning is too rational.  
The main thing to remember is that he is a hero, and the rest of us are shit.

If we thought you were shit, my kinfolk wouldn't have bled and died to save your dumb asses. You are family to us. If you need us again, we'll be there again, but we'd rather not if we don't have to. No, I ain't a hero. The best of us gave everything and all I'm risking is my bank account. I did what I could at the end of the cold war, but the truth is that Statism is self-defeating and mostly what we did was wait for the Soviet empire to collapse under it's own weight. Now Statism is again threatening to end civilization and it's up to us to keep that from happening. Fortunately, time is again on our side because the laws of economics cannot be repealed by legislative fiat.

Americans ain't perfect, but we damn sure aren't gonna wait around for China to pull its head out of its ass before we do something.



288. Post 5032211 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: Zarathustra on February 09, 2014, 08:40:28 AM
Anyone know what's the deal is with Coinbase?  Their price is running about $25 over bitstamp right now, which is by far the furthest I've seen them spread.  Usually they're pegged right within a dollar or two of stamp as that's where they do all their orders from (at least, that was the common assumption).  Very odd that they've been sitting between 695-700 while stamp hovers around 670-675.

Anyone know what's going on there?

Obviously its Americans who are buying the fuck out of bitcoin. Kinda pisses me off that this spread reaches it's peak when I want to be buying and when I pulled the last of my coins out of Gox, the spread was the other way so I lose the spread every fucking time. But make no mistake, it's supply and demand and the yanks are coming.

Coinbase account holders have access to our bank accounts and can buy all we want and we're obviously buying the hell out of this drop. Once again, we have to bail out Europe and the rest of the world. Getting to be a habit. You ungrateful bastards can still suck it when the dollar fails and we still get to keep world reserve currency status!

In Europe, we have an exchange, we have ATMs and there are several European countries with greater adoption per capita. Check sourceforge.

Once again, we have to bail out Europe and the rest of the world.

Once again???

From Nazis, Commies, etc.  Those crosses on the cliffs over Normandy aren't just landscaping.

Haha. You mean Wallstreet bailed out? Those who create the monsters are those who save the world from it?

Sutton's next three major published books — Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler and Wall Street and FDR — detailed Wall Street's involvement in the Bolshevik Revolution (in order to destroy Russia as an economic competitor and turn it into "a captive market and a technical colony to be exploited by a few high-powered American financiers and the corporations under their control"[3]) as well as its decisive contributions to the rise of Adolf Hitler and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whose policies he assessed as being essentially the same, namely "corporate socialism" planned by the big corporations.[4] Sutton concluded that this was all part of the economic power elites' "long-range program of nurturing collectivism"[1] and fostering "corporate socialism" in order to ensure "monopoly acquisition of wealth", because it "would fade away if it were exposed to the activity of a free market".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_C._Sutton

I'm no fan of Wall Street and I prolly hate banksters worse than you do, but if you hate 'em so much, then why are you selling them your bitcoin at fire sale prices?  I sure as hell am not.



289. Post 5032403 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: Zarathustra on February 09, 2014, 08:59:59 AM
Anyone know what's the deal is with Coinbase?  Their price is running about $25 over bitstamp right now, which is by far the furthest I've seen them spread.  Usually they're pegged right within a dollar or two of stamp as that's where they do all their orders from (at least, that was the common assumption).  Very odd that they've been sitting between 695-700 while stamp hovers around 670-675.

Anyone know what's going on there?

Obviously its Americans who are buying the fuck out of bitcoin. Kinda pisses me off that this spread reaches it's peak when I want to be buying and when I pulled the last of my coins out of Gox, the spread was the other way so I lose the spread every fucking time. But make no mistake, it's supply and demand and the yanks are coming.

Coinbase account holders have access to our bank accounts and can buy all we want and we're obviously buying the hell out of this drop. Once again, we have to bail out Europe and the rest of the world. Getting to be a habit. You ungrateful bastards can still suck it when the dollar fails and we still get to keep world reserve currency status!

In Europe, we have an exchange, we have ATMs and there are several European countries with greater adoption per capita. Check sourceforge.

Once again, we have to bail out Europe and the rest of the world.

Once again???

From Nazis, Commies, etc.  Those crosses on the cliffs over Normandy aren't just landscaping.

Haha. You mean Wallstreet bailed out? Those who create the monsters are those who save the world from it?

Sutton's next three major published books — Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler and Wall Street and FDR — detailed Wall Street's involvement in the Bolshevik Revolution (in order to destroy Russia as an economic competitor and turn it into "a captive market and a technical colony to be exploited by a few high-powered American financiers and the corporations under their control"[3]) as well as its decisive contributions to the rise of Adolf Hitler and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whose policies he assessed as being essentially the same, namely "corporate socialism" planned by the big corporations.[4] Sutton concluded that this was all part of the economic power elites' "long-range program of nurturing collectivism"[1] and fostering "corporate socialism" in order to ensure "monopoly acquisition of wealth", because it "would fade away if it were exposed to the activity of a free market".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_C._Sutton

I'm no fan of Wall Street and I prolly hate banksters worse than you do, but if you hate 'em so much, then why are you selling them your bitcoin at fire sale prices?

Are you crazy?

Please go away or stay at home with your stories about history that you were told by your state (terrorists).
A state who has been involved in more than one hundred wars in its short career.

LOL. You can say what you want about us yanks, but tonight, the line was held by Americans at Coinbase. I probably hate my government worse than you do, but I've never been more proud of my countrymen. I don't know the future, but if I have anything to do with it, we'll be taking the lead from here. Sell your coins at a $30 loss if you want. Courage wouldn't mean anything if everybody had it.



290. Post 5032540 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: mah87 on February 09, 2014, 09:17:48 AM
STILL BULLS IN DENIAL HERE ? TELL ME WHEN THIS IS GONNA TOUCH 1000$ again !

You remind me of some guy three years ago. "Bulls still in denial here? When is it gonna touch $10 again?"



291. Post 5033188 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: Zarathustra on February 09, 2014, 09:23:03 AM


Yes, because you are a countryman, a nationalist, a collectivist.


I don't know the future, but if I have anything to do with it, we'll be taking the lead from here.

You are a 'we'-man, a collectivist.


Sell your coins at a $30 loss if you want. Courage wouldn't mean anything if everybody had it.

Sell? Are you crazy?


A heard a story once 'bout an Englishman who bought some land in Texas and went to inspect his property. He thought he'd call on the rancher next door, but the rancher was not to be found. So this Limey spies a ranch hand mending a fence and goes up to ask him about the rancher. "Pardon me, Ol' Chap," Says the Englishman.  "Might I inquire as to the whereabouts of your master?" The cowboy looks the Englishman right in the eye and says, "Mister, that son of a bitch ain't been born yet."

That's the America I love and it has nothing to do with the crooks in New York or Washington. You can call me a collectivist if you want, but I consider myself more of a family man. Sometimes that means being a team player and sometimes that means following your conscience, your own council, and your heart on some lonely trail.

We ain't as different as you think, Mr. Philosopher. You got gumption, and I like that. In fact, I sense a little family resemblance.



292. Post 5033283 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: isov on February 09, 2014, 10:33:18 AM


Yes, because you are a countryman, a nationalist, a collectivist.


I don't know the future, but if I have anything to do with it, we'll be taking the lead from here.

You are a 'we'-man, a collectivist.


Sell your coins at a $30 loss if you want. Courage wouldn't mean anything if everybody had it.

Sell? Are you crazy?


A heard a story once 'bout an Englishman who bought some land in Texas and went to inspect his property. He thought he'd call on the rancher next door, but the rancher was not to be found. So this Limey spies a ranch hand mending a fence and goes up to ask him about the rancher. "Pardon me, Ol' Chap," Says the Englishman.  "Might I inquire as to the whereabouts of your master?" The cowboy looks the Englishman right in the eye and says, "Mister, that son of a bitch ain't been born yet."

That's the America I love and it has nothing to do with the crooks in New York or Washington. You can call me a collectivist if you want, but I consider myself more of a family man. Sometimes that means being a team player and sometimes that means following your conscience, your own council, and your heart on some lonely trail.

We ain't as different as you think, Mr. Philosopher. You got gumption, and I like that. In fact, I sense a little family resemblance.
Why do you even have to mention anything about america then? Isn't it quite the same in every country? A will to be a free man making his own decisions and not giving a fuck about the country where this is happening.

A little friendly competition never hurt anybody ;-)



293. Post 5033818 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: isov on February 09, 2014, 10:48:02 AM
I'm from Finland myself but don't see the reason to start competiting with my nationality since it's a quite small country eventhough it may have done some world scale things also. I try to think myself as a citizen of the world where we are all equal. At the moment I'm in Indonesia taking refugee from finnish winter and enjoying the cheap prices on everything Smiley

A lot of good Americans come from Finland! America isn't really a nation in the European sense. It's just a place where people came from all over who wanted to be left alone by kings and parliaments so they could make something of themselves and provide for their families. A lot of that spirit got lost, but it's still alive out in the countryside and pockets of the cities. Please don't judge us by the actions of our government. We don't really get to choose who runs the show. It's always either bankster puppet A or bankster puppet B. Real Americans are standing alongside Good Finns, British, Chinese, Brazilians and whoever against the fucking banker oligarchy that stinks up every country on the planet. Those Occupy Wall Street hippies were just the loyal opposition. We're the ones who are gonna have to rebuild world finance when the fiat house of cards crumbles. I aim to do my part and I welcome anyone from anywhere who feels the same way.



294. Post 5034148 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: mah87 on February 09, 2014, 11:46:52 AM
Btw the price is going up

It's gonna crash.

If so, I'll buy more. I'll run up my credit cards if I have to. Get a second job even. This ain't my first rodeo. Sometimes I wonder if the big money monitors this forum to see when the last bulls capitulate. If so, they have a long way to wait.



295. Post 5034370 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: strawbs on February 09, 2014, 12:04:42 PM
I'm from Finland myself but don't see the reason to start competiting with my nationality since it's a quite small country eventhough it may have done some world scale things also. I try to think myself as a citizen of the world where we are all equal. At the moment I'm in Indonesia taking refugee from finnish winter and enjoying the cheap prices on everything Smiley

A lot of good Americans come from Finland! America isn't really a nation in the European sense. It's just a place where people came from all over who wanted to be left alone by kings and parliaments so they could make something of themselves and provide for their families. A lot of that spirit got lost, but it's still alive out in the countryside and pockets of the cities. Please don't judge us by the actions of our government. We don't really get to choose who runs the show. It's always either bankster puppet A or bankster puppet B. Real Americans are standing alongside Good Finns, British, Chinese, Brazilians and whoever against the fucking banker oligarchy that stinks up every country on the planet. Those Occupy Wall Street hippies were just the loyal opposition. We're the ones who are gonna have to rebuild world finance when the fiat house of cards crumbles. I aim to do my part and I welcome anyone from anywhere who feels the same way.

Off topic, a lot.  Perhaps start your own thread?

I've said my peace. I was just pointing out that Coinbase isn't getting pushed around by Chinese exchanges anymore.



296. Post 5034775 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

It's significant that Coinbase has decoupled from Stamp and led the bounce. This makes it tough to make future predictions because we don't have volume data.  Coinbase is growing at an exponential rate and once an account is verified, you can buy directly from your bank account after hours and on weekends.  



297. Post 5035166 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: kurious on February 09, 2014, 01:17:12 PM
Quick one - am having a problem with a transaction sending from wallet to Stamp.

It's taken 2 and a half hours, still no confirmations.

Anyone help with an explanation?  It's showing there as 'incoming' but with no conf's and same in my wallet - 54 nodes, but still unconfirmed?!!

Advice will be most welcome.

Wrong thread. My advice is hold out for a better price.



298. Post 5035968 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: jamesb777 on February 09, 2014, 02:13:02 PM
That buy on Stamp was maybe the most retard behavior i have seen there in the last weeks...

The dumps down to 619 were pretty good as well ^ ^.

I was just thinking the same thing. That's a $140 swing in just over 2 days. Still way too early to tell if it's a dead cat bounce or not, but it could be a real bottom. I made a little money, just enough to fight another day. TERA knows her shit and it's tough to take money off of her, so I savor these little victories :-D



299. Post 5036016 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: pheL on February 09, 2014, 02:24:03 PM
I  just don't understand this current upward drift in price. Unless people are bored on Sunday.

Bored and greedy. As this day comes to an end, so will the uptrend.

That's possible, Newbie, but it's also possible that the worm has turned. Every torrent begins with a trickle.



300. Post 5036298 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: pheL on February 09, 2014, 02:37:43 PM
I  just don't understand this current upward drift in price. Unless people are bored on Sunday.

Bored and greedy. As this day comes to an end, so will the uptrend.

That's possible, Newbie, but it's also possible that the worm has turned. Every torrent begins with a trickle.

I don't see how people won't just take profit of this ~$40-50 swing when there's nothing backing it up in more than 24 hrs.

They might. I don't have a crystal ball. I just buy when it goes down and sell when it comes up, but I think it's possible that greed on Coinbase trumps fear in China. I tried like hell to buy the bottom, but San Francisco just didn't follow HooBoy. Without knowing the volume at Coinbase, we just don't know.



301. Post 5036898 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: mah87 on February 09, 2014, 03:26:51 PM
stamp going down again, and btc-e down?

Slowly coming back to 100$

hmmm. I see a pattern here.

If I was a whale, I'd pay some Asians $0.30/hr to flood this forum and reddit with FUD at opportune times. I wouldn't be wasting my own time. If Bitcoin goes anywhere near $100, I will panic sell and buy it all back at $40. Hell, I'll double my coins and spend the rest on hookers and blow. That's the luxury of buying in at $10. But I think it's more likely to do this:




302. Post 5037081 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: pietje on February 09, 2014, 03:41:14 PM
That guy with the big buy a few hours ago must feel bad now.

That's the irony. Trades based on feelings usually lead to bad feelings. I screw up market timing all the time, but losses are only actualized if you sell. If you think in terms of opportunity costs, you will go crazy.



303. Post 5037667 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 09, 2014, 04:15:57 PM
That guy with the big buy a few hours ago must feel bad now.
you never market buy when the price is going down.

It wasn't going down. It was a low volume melt up. Besides, it's still $735 on Coinbase. A little arbitrage and he wouldn't lose that much even if the price stays were it is or doesn't drop too much. Or he could be covering an off-exchange put and locked in his profit when he bought. But yeah, he prolly is regretting it. Hindsight is 20/20.



304. Post 5037797 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on February 09, 2014, 04:31:28 PM
That's the luxury of buying in at $10. But I think it's more likely to do this:


Someone bought Most of my coins at $10 not long ago, I don't think I'll get a chance to buy back ever.
I like your image.

yeah, opportunities are everywhere, but prolly not that one. On the bright side, at least you got more than a couple of pizzas for them!



305. Post 5037957 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 09, 2014, 04:35:26 PM
That guy with the big buy a few hours ago must feel bad now.
you never market buy when the price is going down.

It wasn't going down. It was a low volume melt up. Besides, it's still $735 on Coinbase. A little arbitrage and he wouldn't lose that much even if the price stays were it is or doesn't drop too much. Or he could be covering an off-exchange put and locked in his profit when he bought. But yeah, he prolly is regretting it. Hindsight is 20/20.


I wouldnt call a volume of 60 k @ stamp a low volume melt up.

Its quite the opposite: this is a low volume rally.

If that guy holds on long enough, he'll likely make a profit. It's just a question of how long he has to wait. Lots of coins changed hands at higher prices than that. Even momo traders are mostly just doing it to increase their coin stacks and not cash out permanently. Bitcoin's been through MUCH worse than this. I heard it said that day trading bitcoin is like juggling chainsaws on a tightrope over a vat of boiling acid. I'll keep buying until the idiots on tout TV like Jim Kramer tell me to buy. Then I'll sell. Mean time I'll mostly hodl.



306. Post 5045989 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 09, 2014, 10:56:10 PM


The nuclear industry once sponsored a very thorough safety study that examined all the ways in which a nuclear plant could possibly fail, and concluded that, assuming several hundred operating reactors, there might be one partial meltdown every century or so.  That was before Three Mile Island, of course.  According to the principles of that study,  three separate reactors melting down down at the same time would be less likely than a meteorite killing Santa Claus; and the possibility that an unloaded reactor could explode and become a major nuclear risk was not even considered.

NASA too once sponsored a very detailed study of the Space Shuttle's safety.  It concluded that the chances of a total loss were about 1 every 100,000 launches.  The actual rate turned out to be 1 every 50 launches.

Ok, I was a U.S. Navy "Nuke" on the U.S.S. Ohio. Three mile Island was not a meltdown, partial or otherwise. The control rods scrammed and it was sub-critical. Some fission particles escaped when the core was partially uncovered. This is not a meltdown. Chernobyl was a meltdown, but it was a very different design. What made Three Mile Island significant was that the incident occurred just about the time the movie "The China Syndrome" came out and scared the bejeesus out of everyone.

Water-cooled reactors like in the U.S. and Europe are much safer than liquid sodium reactors. Many of them are designed to automatically shut down when the tempt gets too high by having a built in negative temperature coefficient of reactivity. Also the poison (control) rods are held out the top of the reactors by electromagnets, so they fall into the core and shut it down whenever there is a loss of power.




307. Post 5046170 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: bitwager on February 10, 2014, 12:40:02 AM
Sorry if I missed it, but was the fact that Coinbase ran out of fiat on bitstamp talked about in here?  Extremely bullish...

http://www.reddit.com/r/CoinBase/comments/1xek7t/why_is_coinbase_buy_price_so_much_higher_than/

Makes sense. So come Monday, there will be upwards pressure on the bitstamp price and downwards pressure at Coinbase when they equalize.  Gringos are buying.



308. Post 5046725 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 10, 2014, 01:23:22 AM
Ok, I was a U.S. Navy "Nuke" on the U.S.S. Ohio. Three mile Island was not a meltdown, partial or otherwise. The control rods scrammed and it was sub-critical. Some fission particles escaped when the core was partially uncovered. This is not a meltdown.

Sorry to have started an off-topic discussion... But Three Mile Island was indeed a meltdown, although it fortunately failed to breach the pressure vessel.

The industry initially denied any meltdown, but the truth became evident many years later, when the pressure vessel was finally opened and its contents were removed.  A large portion of the fuel had melted, leaving a wide cavity in the middle of the core.  The molten stuff trickled down through the remaining water, bore twice through internal steel baffles and collected  at the bottom of the pressure vessel.  If the operators had taken a little longer to do the right thing, it would surely had breached the pressure vessel, like Fukushima #1--#3 did.  See the Wikipedia article  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_accident. (The /Science/ magazine had a long article about that in the 1980s).  

EDIT: PS. By the way, the Fukushima reactors all scrammed properly and were completely shut down when the tsunami hit.  The meltdown occurred because of the heat given off by the radioactive elements resulting from fission, which is not stopped by the control rods and requires active cooling for months after shutdown.  Also, none of the reactors that melted down used sodium as a coolant.

yeah this is off-topic. Some new info, so thanks, but many of these risks can be reduced or eliminated with design changes. For example, if the reactor is capable of natural circulation, then cooling pumps wouldn't be needed after shutdown.

back to the thread. Is is just us Americans who couldn't get fiat to the exchanges who want to buy or is this a more global development?



309. Post 5050121 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

The market hates uncertainty. It's better to have bad news than no news at all. Mark either doesn't know this or doesn't care. I wouldn't be surprised if he is murdered.

Why isn't anyone buying on Bitstamp? Every other market is higher. Stamp was never a market leader, so what are you  guys waiting for?



310. Post 5050465 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on February 10, 2014, 07:44:11 AM
The market hates uncertainty. It's better to have bad news than no news at all. Mark either doesn't know this or doesn't care. I wouldn't be surprised if he is murdered.

Why isn't anyone buying on Bitstamp? Every other market is higher. Stamp was never a market leader, so what are you  guys waiting for?

Because everybody is pooping their pants...again. Waiting for the next omg panic sell! Silly, silly sheep.

When this round of panic selling is done and we're at 550 they're gonna start looking for the next reason to omg panic.

Not everybody-just the traders on Bitstamp.  It seems unwise for the people with the least access to information to attempt to front-run a downturn that may not happen.



311. Post 5050958 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

there it goes!



312. Post 5068457 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

That was the bottom of the bear market. I've seen it several times before and that's what it looked like.  You can quote me on that.



313. Post 5068605 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: dgarcia on February 11, 2014, 01:06:13 AM
That was the bottom of the bear market. I've seen it several times before and that's what it looked like.  You can quote me on that.

LOL. All big dumps from here on out will be profit taking and not people cutting their losses. The weak hands lost their grip and gave us their coins. We're coming out of the valley and onto the plains, building up speed for the next mountain range.



314. Post 5068721 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: dgarcia on February 11, 2014, 01:16:53 AM
thanks for helping me refill my pockets, Boys!

Thanks for helping me refill my pocket, Boy! A good deal is where both parties are satisfied.

Just teasing (trolling) a bit  Wink

You'll forgive me, not?

No problem!  My pockets are even more full now than when I wrote that. Congratulations on a good call.



315. Post 5068888 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: Vigil on February 11, 2014, 01:28:40 AM
That was the bottom of the bear market. I've seen it several times before and that's what it looked like.  You can quote me on that.

LOL. All big dumps from here on out will be profit taking and not people cutting their losses. The weak hands lost their grip and gave us their coins. We're coming out of the valley and onto the plains, building up speed for the next mountain range.
There haven't been any cheap coins if you are trying to purchase from Coinbase. They are still at $700 aside from the 5 minutes this early morning (Eastern Time) when they went down.

There was a period where they were in the 630s. I bought a little and went back to sleep. Americans don't cower when we get scared. We find somebody's ass to kick.



316. Post 5069024 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 11, 2014, 01:35:20 AM
That was the bottom of the bear market. I've seen it several times before and that's what it looked like.  You can quote me on that.

the scary part is that ask depth hasn't grown all that much...

this leads me to believe there are still plenty of gains to be had, and we will put in a new and much higher ATH, in the near future


FUD be damned,

we are going to mars even if  Mr Putin didn't Put in anything

Putin will lose some popularity points if he causes Russians to miss out on this.



317. Post 5071915 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Bear Trap just slammed shut on Stamp. The first of many to come.



318. Post 5072090 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: spooderman on February 11, 2014, 06:15:46 AM
it's both a bull and a bear trap at same time.

what do we call those? a blair trap. yay. we have finally found a way to arrest the war criminal, and it's through tarding btc Smiley

Hard to sell coins for a profit if you don't have any left to sell. Coinbase as much as admitted that they have no miner's coins left and now have to buy on stamp. You can figure out what that means.



319. Post 5072327 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 11, 2014, 06:35:05 AM

Hard to sell coins for a profit if you don't have any left to sell. Coinbase as much as admitted that they have no miner's coins left and now have to buy on stamp. You can figure out what that means.

Does Coinbase really rely on miner's coins?

How do you know this?

*edited to remove confusion*

They did. It was well known that, although their prices were lower, Coinbase would get them their fiat in a reliable, timely manner. There prices stayed low as we traders cut our losses and transferred out coins from Gox so we could get at least some money out. This was back when only fiat withdrawals from Gox were delayed. Then Coinbase's supply of cheap coins apparently ran out and the price diverged from Bitstamp to a noticable degree. Coinbase put out a notice on their reddit explaining the price differential and essentially begging us Yanks to sell for the premium we would be getting. Few took advantage of this because most us us were buying by then. So yesterday, they got more money to Stamp and the prices equalized somewhat, but still noticeably higher at CB. The miners I suspect are now selling to Second Market, Winklevi, and other institutional investors for better prices. Few miners are selling retail at these prices. They have better options.



320. Post 5072500 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

another 785 BTC buy on stamp



321. Post 5072796 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 11, 2014, 07:25:29 AM

Hard to sell coins for a profit if you don't have any left to sell. Coinbase as much as admitted that they have no miner's coins left and now have to buy on stamp. You can figure out what that means.

Does Coinbase really rely on miner's coins?

How do you know this?

*edited to remove confusion*

They did. It was well known that, although their prices were lower, Coinbase would get them their fiat in a reliable, timely manner. There prices stayed low as we traders cut our losses and transferred out coins from Gox so we could get at least some money out. This was back when only fiat withdrawals from Gox were delayed. Then Coinbase's supply of cheap coins apparently ran out and the price diverged from Bitstamp to a noticable degree. Coinbase put out a notice on their reddit explaining the price differential and essentially begging us Yanks to sell for the premium we would be getting. Few took advantage of this because most us us were buying by then. So yesterday, they got more money to Stamp and the prices equalized somewhat, but still noticeably higher at CB. The miners I suspect are now selling to Second Market, Winklevi, and other institutional investors for better prices. Few miners are selling retail at these prices. They have better options.

Interesting. you think institutions are paying more to get in bed with the producers? to insure a steady flow?

or just paying premium to get untainted coins?

I don't know for sure, but dealing directly with miners and buyers, they both save on fees. The Winkilevos Twins did say publicly that they have a relationship with several big miners. Second market is buying in bulk and the only buyer from them that I know about is BIT.



322. Post 5073280 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Just hit the 4hr cross. looks like 700 is the new floor.



323. Post 5073598 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: electronistul on February 11, 2014, 08:39:42 AM
Huobi having a lil mini rally.

mini rally better stop soon before it becomes not mini.
someone Shotred a lil' early ?

Yeah someone missed the train. Maybe it'll slow down enough for them to catch up.



324. Post 5076189 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: Kramerc on February 11, 2014, 10:07:09 AM
If 688 falls, I'm expecting 620 today.

Didn't get the memo? We're doing thing a little different now.




325. Post 5091703 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

I'm not gonna lie, these last few weeks have been a bag of suck. But it makes we wonder why someone is going through all that effort to make it suck. Why do banks and governments see Bitcoin as a threat? Why do hackers want our coins so badly? It's like when lottery winners see fair-weather friends and dirt-bag relatives come out of the woodwork. It's the price of success.



326. Post 5091741 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on February 12, 2014, 01:51:58 AM
Goat is great guy, but too young and immature to be the voice of bitcoin.

My vote would go to Andreas http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbSdnuFOLV4nMiQG9gvPBX_VQUf6E4COM

Andreas is de facto the voice of Bitcoin right now.



327. Post 5091974 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: Denton on February 12, 2014, 02:04:44 AM
I'm not gonna lie, these last few weeks have been a bag of suck.
These past few weeks made me a strong HODLER. I am basically unable to panic sell and all i can do while the price is falling is curse at my luck for not having any fiat ready...


I've been buying and I'll keep buying, on credit if I have to. As long as my bitcoin holdings are worth more than 10X my debt, I'm going to use the banksters system against them. Take some of that monopoly they print out of thin air and trade it for real money.



328. Post 5092166 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: fotosonics on February 12, 2014, 02:31:59 AM
Lasky: “Let’s be frank, a lot more money has been laundered through large banks than has been laundered through virtual currency.”



That's very noteworthy. In the hearings, Lawsky implied that he'd rather ban crypto rather than see any money laundering. Now, I don't think he could be much more pro-Bitcoin without losing his credibility as a regulator.



329. Post 5100363 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: mellowyellow on February 12, 2014, 12:41:48 PM
I'm beginning to doubt this whole thing.  Bitcoin isn't anonymous and is actually more traceable than cash, it is actually run by a secretive central core of developers instead of being decentralised, has massive security issues instead of being rock solid technology.

Actually everything I thought when I first bought in turns out to be 'not quite right'.

Anyone else feeling a little bit cheated? I want to keep the faith but wondering if there are better things I could be putting my money into (tesla for example).

This literally made me laugh. Tesla? srsly? Electric cars are no improvement over internal combustion. There's the issue of power density, ya know, batteries- those things that keep catching on fire and exploding in Tesla cars?

Invest in tech that makes life better for the user,  not for the climate or whatever. That won't make you money. If you want to give every merchant you do business with the keys to your credit account, be my guest. if you think Bitcoin isn't anonymous enough because you're too lazy to figure out how to make it so, sell me your coins. If you need Mommy government, daddy VISA and uncle Paypal to make your life simpler and safer, and you don't mind the fees, the time and the freedom they take, then sell me your coins and go invest in a hot rod golf cart company.

"massive issues"?  You mean like central monetary planning? charge-backs? the ability for the bank or government to arbitrarily seize your funds on a pretext?

Do you have any idea what a clown you're making of yourself?




330. Post 5100414 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on February 12, 2014, 12:38:06 PM

There's room for doubt about the existence of the coins on the exchanges we already, if those unscrupulous bastards get involved they'll certainly try to turn it into a fractional reserve system. Screw that, distributed exchanges ftw.
Btw, the real target here may be the hashrate, force it low enough and in theory miners should shut down and the whole network slow to a crawl... except it doesn't, both miners and hodlers have a lot more balls than whatever generic investor profile attackers are using, the hashrate keeps building and cheap coins are being scooped up by the thousand.

If that's true, that means there are less actively traded coins on the market than we all think, which means the price is too low. Supply and demand, such a simple concept and so difficult for so many to grasp.



331. Post 5100496 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 12, 2014, 02:12:13 PM
Fun: Mark made a deal with FBI to sell their coins in regard for info and freedom.

Would be hilarious if he made a deal, U.S. gov sent coins then Mark said, "Sorry, I can't send funds to U.S. and BTC withdrawals have been suspended. But you can keep trading just like normal!"

ROTFL!  I'd almost forgive him all his buffoonery if he did that.



332. Post 5100654 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on February 12, 2014, 02:20:42 PM
I have one question. Bitstamp and BTC-E have the same problems as MTGOX, how come it that Stamp and BTC-E are +150 higher? I would love to buy coins @gox prices from stamp. Also have an big order at around 580 but I dont see it going that much down?!

I don't see it going down that much either, but I never thought it would get as low as it is, so maybe you'll get lucky. Fuck. China, Russia, Shrem, Gox, localbitcoin bust in FL, transaction malleability, flies, locusts, pestilence- this is one tough puppy.



333. Post 5101014 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: creekbore on February 12, 2014, 02:45:21 PM

Invest in tech that makes life better for the user,  not for the climate or whatever.


I'm assuming you live somewhere immune from any climatic changes or "whatever" and don't eat food (produced in the environment) or drink clean water.  It must be great living in that bubble, removed from the reality the rest of us experience.

Much better to keep burning all that oil that comes from the middle east.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Governments love to distribute costs and concentrate benefits. You apparently want to concentrate the costs (on yourself!!) and distribute the benefits. Thanks! I'll be free riding on your sacrifice along with about seven billion other people. It's not cost-effective to reduce global warming. It's more cost-effective to mitigate the negative effects and enjoy the positive effects. Now, back to the topic:

If you want to help the environment, how about a technology that encourages people to consume less, like a currency with a deflationary bias?



334. Post 5101353 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 12, 2014, 03:00:33 PM
This is, you know, like, just your opinion, man. My opinion, being an owner of an electric car since 2010, is that it is much better for my daily use than the gas-powered truck I have sitting collecting dust next to it.

What's the range on that thing? 150 miles? POWER DENSITY. fix that problem and I'll buy one myself. all things else being equal.

You have no comment about my claim that inflationary currency encourages consumption and is therefor more harmful to the environment than a deflationary currency that encourages thrift and savings? How much energy did it take to build that truck you don't use?

Stay on topic, Junior. This ain't a pecker-flexing contest.





335. Post 5101555 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

in a free market, money represents energy, the ability to do useful work. When you factor in total costs per mile, including fuel, maintenance, purchase price, resale value- electrics and hybrids are more expensive than internal combustion cars. That means they consume more energy and are WORSE for the environment. When you factor in that electrics and hybrids are subsidized, the case for them is even weaker.

Sure, mining takes electricity, but a heluva lot less energy than it takes the government to maintain the guns and the thugs who force us to pay our taxes in government fiat. This is a benefit of crypto I never hear anyone talking about.



336. Post 5101751 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 12, 2014, 03:25:35 PM
This literally made me laugh. Tesla? srsly? Electric cars are no improvement over internal combustion. There's the issue of power density, ya know, batteries- those things that keep catching on fire and exploding in Tesla cars?

You've obviously never driven a Tesla.  Power and Luxury.  Definitely the best car ever made.  I don't care about the tech.  It could run on clubbing baby seals for all I care.

And they burn and explode at a much lower rate than do internal combustion cars.

Again, how far between recharges and how long does a recharge take? If I want power, I'll drive my Yamaha R6 at 170 mph and get 45 MPG. oh, and it cost $10 grand TT&L included. Tesla is a luxury status symbol BECAUSE it is an unnecessary expense. Hard to square that with a credible claim to love the environment. I want to get from here to there without waiting around for a few hours to recharge my ride like it's a dildo with NiCads.



337. Post 5101914 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 12, 2014, 03:24:26 PM
Looking at the historic price charts for the last few years, I would think that China is responsible for 95% of the current price.
Even if there were no miners in China, and there are a huge number of them, that would be too high of an estimate. Chinese hackers also put downward pressure on the price by scaring off would be investors and dumping stolen coins.



338. Post 5102018 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: creekbore on February 12, 2014, 02:45:21 PM

Much better to keep burning all that oil that comes from the middle east.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

America is a net oil exporter. Didn'tcha know?



339. Post 5102328 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 12, 2014, 04:00:12 PM

You have no comment about my claim that inflationary currency encourages consumption and is therefor more harmful to the environment than a deflationary currency that encourages thrift and savings?

The only comment I have is that I can't recall the actual name for this axiom: it is much easier for a doofus to spread FUD than it is for some conscientious person to debunk it. So mostly I ignore what you have to say because I can't take all day every day to continually point out where you're wrong. The problem is you seem to have about 20% interesting stuff to say so I can't just click the ignore button.



Uh, thanks. I think.  So anyone else make this observation or have an argument against it? People spend dollars on shit they don't need in part because with inflation and low interest rates, there's no incentive to save. This is really bad ecologically speaking, right?



340. Post 5102386 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: threecats on February 12, 2014, 04:06:41 PM
no, but it's getting a little old .... : -)  ....

Stamp's doing nothing, and Gox dosen't matter, so we're doing something else until there's a movement.



341. Post 5102410 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: threecats on February 12, 2014, 04:12:58 PM
and a 141 buy on stamp ...

spoke too soon, apparently.



342. Post 5102806 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on February 12, 2014, 04:15:18 PM
Keep stroking that shriveled up US-centric, climate change denying old man cock. It'll grow again one day, I'm sure Cheesy
Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Don't forget "bitcoin cultist".

I don't deny climate change. I just don't know if it's A) man-made, B) on net harmful but what I do know is that the economic cost of slowing it are greater than the benefit.  

and I prefer the term "Bitcoin Nutter".  Cultists have friends.


"most bots are fed with informations of this thread. mentioning "choo choo" or "train" three times results in immediate selloffs"

I suspected as much.



343. Post 5115770 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

People's understanding of the world comes from the models they use. Every model is an oversimplification, but when reality substantially diverges from what they expect to happen, they can tweak their models, reject them entirely and adopt new models, or they can blame some extraneous factor or anomaly that temporarily renders their predictions inaccurate.

I knew that there was going to be push-back from governments. I knew that there were glitches that hackers would attempt to exploit. I  knew there was going to be volatility from momentum riders and I knew there were going to be cases of human fallibility (looking at you, Mark) that would adversely effect the ecosystem. What I didn't expect was that it would all happen at once. And yet the price is still >100% over the April 2013 high.

There are people in this forum and on this thread, who are either skeptical on Bitcoin's long-term success or who are outright certain of failure. Why would they spend so much time and effort reading and posting here? Cognitive dissonance can be a powerful motivating force, responsible for ideological and religious wars for millennia. Even if they have no money riding one way or another, they are smart enough to know that everyone has skin in this game. I say this to their credit because the alternative is to believe they're just assholes who like to annoy people. Whether or not Bitcoin succeeds is a big deal. It's not just about some people making or losing money. It's about how civilization functions. Can decentralized, distributed systems out compete and out perform hierarchical systems? The outcome of this experiment will be a strong indicator one way or another.

The models most people use will not only have to be tweaked if Bitcoin succeeds. They will have to be discarded and replaced. I don't think the majority of the skeptics really want Bitcoin to fail. I think they just want to make sure we're for real and not just starry-eyed idealists riding skittles-pooping unicorns. So we should be grateful for our adversities, because they will either make us stronger or expose our errors.

oh yeah, and CCMF!




344. Post 5115903 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on February 13, 2014, 08:47:18 AM
What's today's reason for the sheep to panic btw?

Gox.  The only way out of emptyGox now is that SOME people can get fiat out, so they are running for the only exit. Same reason the price was so high when most could only get BTC out. The other exchanges are just following.  



345. Post 5116078 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on February 13, 2014, 09:03:32 AM
So nothing really. As most of the times. Panic selling because there might be panic selling.
Really at which point is this gonna stop? How is it gonna stop? When we reach the bottom? Is everybody happy then?

Can't these people really not understand the simple concept that what they are doing is exactly the reason why their coins lose value? And that is exactly what they fear? How silly can it get?

You've been through this before, Shrooms.  You know this is only temporary.

I know but it feels different this time. Mainly because people don't care about good news anymore. Which was the reason we always went up before. They completely ignore that now. The only thing on their mins since jan 1 is sell sell sell.
I don't think we've had this happen before.

When people start saying "it's different this time", it's usually an indicator of a market turning.



346. Post 5116135 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 13, 2014, 09:13:22 AM
So nothing really. As most of the times. Panic selling because there might be panic selling.
Really at which point is this gonna stop? How is it gonna stop? When we reach the bottom? Is everybody happy then?

Can't these people really not understand the simple concept that what they are doing is exactly the reason why their coins lose value? And that is exactly what they fear? How silly can it get?

You've been through this before, Shrooms.  You know this is only temporary.

I know but it feels different this time. Mainly because people don't care about good news anymore. Which was the reason we always went up before. They completely ignore that now. The only thing on their mins since jan 1 is sell sell sell.
I don't think we've had this happen before.

When people start saying "it's different this time", it's usually an indicator of a market turning.

"Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau." ~Irving Fisher, 1929

The "new Economy", profits don't matter~ everybody, 1999




347. Post 5116215 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: surfer43 on February 13, 2014, 09:19:28 AM
So nothing really. As most of the times. Panic selling because there might be panic selling.
Really at which point is this gonna stop? How is it gonna stop? When we reach the bottom? Is everybody happy then?

Can't these people really not understand the simple concept that what they are doing is exactly the reason why their coins lose value? And that is exactly what they fear? How silly can it get?

You've been through this before, Shrooms.  You know this is only temporary.

I know but it feels different this time. Mainly because people don't care about good news anymore. Which was the reason we always went up before. They completely ignore that now. The only thing on their mins since jan 1 is sell sell sell.
I don't think we've had this happen before.

When people start saying "it's different this time", it's usually an indicator of a market turning.

"Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau." ~Irving Fisher, 1929

The "new Economy", profits don't matter~ everybody, 1999


nice quotes to ease the panic  Tongue So you turned into a bear like me?  Smiley

It works at market bottoms, too ;-)



348. Post 5116449 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on February 13, 2014, 09:19:55 AM

I know but it feels different this time. Mainly because people don't care about good news anymore. Which was the reason we always went up before. They completely ignore that now. The only thing on their mins since jan 1 is sell sell sell.
I don't think we've had this happen before.

When people start saying "it's different this time", it's usually an indicator of a market turning.

Sorry but reading some of your posts you seem completely delusional.

Yeah, I prolly looked delusional when I started buying in at $6/BTC too. To be fair, it did drop down to $3/BTC after that, so I don't pretend to be good at market timing. I just know that this too shall pass.



349. Post 5117035 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on February 13, 2014, 10:10:54 AM

I know but it feels different this time. Mainly because people don't care about good news anymore. Which was the reason we always went up before. They completely ignore that now. The only thing on their mins since jan 1 is sell sell sell.
I don't think we've had this happen before.

When people start saying "it's different this time", it's usually an indicator of a market turning.

Sorry but reading some of your posts you seem completely delusional.

Yeah, I prolly looked delusional when I started buying in at $6/BTC too. To be fair, it did drop down to $3/BTC after that, so I don't pretend to be good at market timing. I just know that this too shall pass.

You could have bought at .10 and still be completely delusional.

Sure, but I would be so rich that I could just hire people to tell me I was sane. Look, if you were a chick, would just lie to you and tell you your feeeelings matter, but you're ostensibly a man, so you should know that they don't. The market isn't reacting as much to good news as you think it should, well, join the club. Me too. Maybe you're smarter than the average investor. In this game, nothing pays off more than patience.



350. Post 5117232 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: dgarcia on February 13, 2014, 10:46:08 AM
When people start saying "it's different this time", it's usually an indicator of a market turning.

That's true.

And it looks like Billy stumped dumping after breaking 500,00$.

Biggest dump I ever made was 10 BTC at $400 on the way up in November. I paid off some bills. Didn't dump a damn thing on the way down other than a little range trading. In fact, I'm buying. I'll keep buying on the way down until I run out of money, and then run out of credit.



351. Post 5117339 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: creekbore on February 13, 2014, 10:43:43 AM
Quote
your feelings matter but you're ostensibly a man, so you should know that they don't.

Seriously, if you think like that then your idea of being a 'man' is pretty juvenile and you are a pretty strong contender to have mental health issues.

You could argue that emoting is more useful than thinking. You would be wrong, but you could argue that. What you can't credibly say is that juveniles more typically act on what they think as opposed to what they feel, especially when compared to mature adults. You just discredit yourself when you do that. Same goes for comparing men to women, unless you get all your info from The View.



352. Post 5117470 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 13, 2014, 11:06:37 AM
choo choo??! Cheesy

-> http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-02-12/europe-considers-wholesale-savings-confiscation-enforced-redistribution

Holy shit! You know things are bad when a fledgeling asset class that's still in beta starts looking safer than a savings account in a bank.



353. Post 5117689 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

EU confiscation would boost Bitcoin like 10 Cypruses (Cypri?) squared. No, we don't hope it'll happen. It would be a disaster, but it would be a worse disaster if we couldn't help the poor bastards by selling them some crypto.



354. Post 5118086 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: solex on February 13, 2014, 11:48:25 AM

When ZH first posted that article it had a title like "Why aren't Europeans buying Bitcoin".
Then they quickly amended it.

They aren't buying bitcoin (yet) for the same reason people kept their funds at Gox. They didn't see or didn't pay attention to the signs. I took about a 15% hit getting the last of my money out. The price premium was an ominous indicator. Many people didn't race for the lifeboats on the Titanic, either. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalcy_bias




355. Post 5118334 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: electronistul on February 13, 2014, 12:15:16 PM
This is an interesting option.
I'd like that to happen, but as someone who holds some millions of euros in several accounts, spread all over - what would be the incentive to buy bitcoin instead of gold, or real estate for that matter...

It's harder to smuggle gold out in the event of capital controls and damn impossible for land. If you have to pay property tax or are subject to use restrictions, you never really own land anyway.



356. Post 5118556 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: creekbore on February 13, 2014, 12:27:30 PM
Quote
your feelings matter but you're ostensibly a man, so you should know that they don't.

Seriously, if you think like that then your idea of being a 'man' is pretty juvenile and you are a pretty strong contender to have mental health issues.

You could argue that emoting is more useful than thinking. You would be wrong, but you could argue that. What you can't credibly say is that juveniles more typically act on what they think as opposed to what they feel, especially when compared to mature adults. You just discredit yourself when you do that. Same goes for comparing men to women, unless you get all your info from The View.

I have no idea what any of that means.  


That's obvious.



357. Post 5118647 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: pinky on February 13, 2014, 12:41:36 PM
This is an interesting option.
I'd like that to happen, but as someone who holds some millions of euros in several accounts, spread all over - what would be the incentive to buy bitcoin instead of gold, or real estate for that matter...

It's harder to smuggle gold out in the event of capital controls and damn impossible for land. If you have to pay property tax or are subject to use restrictions, you never really own land anyway.

But don't forget that rich participate in writing new laws and they will create few loop-holes. Rich own things - mostly international businesses and transfering things will never be a problem for them. Beside politics is in bed with them.

The rich are not a monolithic block. Some will find ways of protecting themselves and others will not. But everybody has the option of buying bitcoin. It's the lifeboat for everybody, but those who are too afraid to use it are no better off than those who are too stupid.



358. Post 5118893 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):


Quote from: JoeyD on February 13, 2014, 12:38:04 PM
This is an interesting option.
I'd like that to happen, but as someone who holds some millions of euros in several accounts, spread all over - what would be the incentive to buy bitcoin instead of gold, or real estate for that matter...

Confiscation, although it will have another name, like how the Netherlands is now "cutting spending" by robbing all large pools of money like the funds of pensions and housing-corporations in an effort to stimulate the economy and spending. Funny how the press just repeated the statement like it was the most normal thing in the world. However if I were to follow their example and cut my spending at a cash register or with the help of some wealthy looking person in a dark alley I'd be put in jail for days. No wait, jailtime in days was for murder small scale economic crimes off course deserve far harsher punishment, I'm talking weeks maybe months man, the inhumanity.

The way to turn the tables is to find out where the money is going to go and to get there first.

http://movie-sounds.org/old-movie-samples/casablanca-1942/the-leading-banker-in-amsterdam-is-now-the-pastry-chef-in-our-kitchen



359. Post 5119049 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 13, 2014, 01:13:12 PM
Mark is Back! the return of the jedi...

-> http://www.coindesk.com/mt-gox-mark-karpeles-responds-to-critics/

so apparently, we wont be able to withdraw bitcoin from any exchange before a long time (for the malleability issue to be solved, which is clearly not happening yet)... CRASSSSHHHHHHH Grin

It'll be interesting to watch him try and explain why every other exchange is back online except Gox.



360. Post 5119326 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 13, 2014, 01:23:35 PM
Mark is Back! the return of the jedi...

-> http://www.coindesk.com/mt-gox-mark-karpeles-responds-to-critics/

so apparently, we wont be able to withdraw bitcoin from any exchange before a long time (for the malleability issue to be solved, which is clearly not happening yet)... CRASSSSHHHHHHH Grin

It'll be interesting to watch him try and explain why every other exchange is back online except Gox.

I dont think we can withdraw BTCs from either BTC-e or Stamp yet?! and there is no clue when we will be able to do so. could take months..  Roll Eyes

I'm assuming that the other exchanges will find a work-around before Gox does.



361. Post 5119388 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: koryu on February 13, 2014, 01:28:53 PM
can anybody explain who actually benefits from these attacks?

Speculators with short positions, people wanting to buy in at a lower price, businesses with competing products (PayPal, Western Union), governments that enforce capital controls, black-hat hackers wanting street cred, and the thousands of people who publicly predicted Bitcoin would fail.



362. Post 5119762 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: kkaspar on February 13, 2014, 01:49:57 PM

I owned bitcoins till the start of December. After it got clear that there is no future in China, I sold. I bought back in about two weeks ago, partially because I was intoxicated and bored behind the computer. Luckly sold couple of hours later with 803$.
Right now, I don't see myself buying back anytime soon. When I'll buy back in, then It will probably be buying some altcoin, not bitcoin.
Right now the only thing that keeps the bitcoin price from an ugly collapse are the thousands of miners who have invested thousands of dollars in their ASIC equipment. They are the ones who are holding and keeping the supply tight, because selling with this price means no ROI. But they can only hold the price for so long, because the electric bills are piling and their wives or girlfriends are yelling at them on why aren't the noisy machines producing any money like promised.

My faith in bitcoin is in a downtrend while my faith in cryptos and privatized monetary systems in general keeps steady.

Doesn't tell me if you made a profit, loss, or broke even. Usually people with your negativity lost money and hope everyone else does so they don't feel as stupid.

There is a Bitcoin future in China, whether the government bans it or not. The fact that it's useful for evading capital controls and other State restrictions guarantees it.



363. Post 5119834 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: stompix on February 13, 2014, 01:57:54 PM

Ignoring the "I trade like a boss"  I've bought low sold high thingy , the way you talk about miners holding the price and getting yelled at by their wife&girlfriends , the way you said the price should have been controlled , I really don't see you as a person who has a clue about bitcoin , and not as a bitcoin owner at all.


No shit, right? Miners don't have girlfriends. That's what Internet porn is for.



364. Post 5119994 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: kkaspar on February 13, 2014, 02:08:27 PM

I didn't say that the price should be controlled, I told that the marker should have been smarter. There is a difference.


Quote

So who the fuck was supposed to sell at the bottom to make this smart transition and how would that be smart? What an asshole!  It should go down more so it can go up more, right? I guess you are whining that you didn't get enough of an opportunity to prey on panic sellers.

The market is the market, douchenozzle. That's like saying the weather should be smarter. It's not even coherent enough to be wrong.



365. Post 5120380 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 13, 2014, 02:31:10 PM
There is a Bitcoin future in China, whether the government bans it or not. The fact that it's useful for evading capital controls and other State restrictions guarantees it.

Is it?  Basically the only way to convert Yuan to/from Bitcoin now is through a Chinese bank.  Both the bank and the exchange will want your ID. 

What do you mean exactly by "evading capital controls and State restrictions"?


There are many miners in China. The Chinese could buy or trade from them even if all the exchanges closed. One could buy from anyone in China who holds bitcoin and was willing to sell. Communist countries have always had black markets.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_control

The laws of economics cannot be repealed by legislative fiat. You could sooner repeal the Law of Gravity.




366. Post 5120737 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: magicmexican on February 13, 2014, 02:48:18 PM
Gox starting a rally, time to buy

How is Gox a leading indicator? Why does it matter what price people are trading imaginary fiat for imaginary coins? I suspect the only thing Gox prices indicate are the relative likelihood of BTC withdrawals resuming compared to fiat withdrawals.



367. Post 5120766 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on February 13, 2014, 03:02:40 PM
There is a Bitcoin future in China, whether the government bans it or not. The fact that it's useful for evading capital controls and other State restrictions guarantees it.

Is it?  Basically the only way to convert Yuan to/from Bitcoin now is through a Chinese bank.  Both the bank and the exchange will want your ID. 

What do you mean exactly by "evading capital controls and State restrictions"?


There are many miners in China. The Chinese could buy or trade from them even if all the exchanges closed. One could buy from anyone in China who holds bitcoin and was willing to sell. Communist countries have always had black markets.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_control

The laws of economics cannot be repealed by legislative fiat. You could sooner repeal the Law of Gravity.



Chinese may have a Communist government, but it's mainly so in name only. When it comes to the sensibilities of economics, they take a far more liberal stance, than most "democracies".

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/11/21/finally-a-proper-use-for-bitcoin-avoiding-capital-controls/



368. Post 5121030 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 13, 2014, 03:07:33 PM
Basically the only way to convert Yuan to/from Bitcoin now is through a Chinese bank.  Both the bank and the exchange will want your ID. 

What do you mean exactly by "evading capital controls and State restrictions"?

There are many miners in China. The Chinese could buy or trade from them even if all the exchanges closed.

How many coins are being mined these days?   At the price they would fetch outside China, would they be enough for significant evasion?

I don't think that those coins would be easy or safe to get. How would the evaders contact the miners and pay them?  Big miners have large installations and huge electricity bills, they cannot easily hide from the government.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/11/21/finally-a-proper-use-for-bitcoin-avoiding-capital-controls/

If you don't understand how black markets work, that's a separate issue, but there will always be black markets were there are willing buyers and sellers of prohibited goods and services. Did prohibition stop alcohol consumption? War on drugs stop weed smoking? Nobody uses prostitutes or gambles where it's forbidden? Technology that aids smugglers, contraband sellers and other free marketeers will always be in demand. Even the hypocritical State functionaries will use it.



369. Post 5121275 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 13, 2014, 03:22:48 PM
I just had a vision of Chinese people in gambling dens betting bitcoin on cock fights.

I wonder what the Chinese investors expect from Bitcoin.

Since their government has banned the use of cryptocoins as currency, they cannot possibly believe in the old spiel: "One day there will be no Yuan, only bitcoins; so divdiding A by B it is obvious that each bitcoin will be worth a fortune".  They know that bitcoin will "never" be used for payments, much less replace the Yuan.

So, I suspect that there are no "hodlers" in China, except perhaps some ignorant guys who have been told just the conclusion of that spiel, and believed it without understanding why.

I suspect that practically all the investors in China see bitcoin only as a suitable speculation object, and look forward only to its price rising just enough and soon enough for them to make a good profit -- in Yuan.

For them, bitcoin trading itself must be just a form of gambling.

Obviously you are wrong, because according to you, 95% of November rally price is from China and it hasn't dropped to 5% of ATH yet, or is that what you are  predicting? If I lived in China, I'd be a hodler. Moreso than now even. I can do international wire xfers. The Chinese can't. Bitcoin can be spent almost anywhere. The renmimbi can only be spent in China.



370. Post 5121561 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 13, 2014, 03:45:55 PM

Note that the article was written before the Chinese stomped on bitcoin.

But even if nothing had changed, there is one little snag in that article.  If a Chinese citizen uses Yuan to buy bitcoins in China and then sells them for dollars in the US, there is no export of Yuan to the US actually.  Instead the guy gives his Yuan to other Chinese traders, and the US traders give him a bunch of dollars. 

So why would the Chinese government object to a Chinese national receiving a gift from americans?

Sure, after that transaction there would be fewer bitcoins in China and more bitcoins in the US.  But since bitcoins have no intrinsic value, the material wealth of China would not change. There would be still the same amount of food and cars in the Chinese market, and the same amount of Yuan in circulation inside China.

If bitcoins could be used to buy things in China, there might be some Yuan inflation as the bitcoins became scarce and the Yuan lost value relative to them.  But that is why the government banned their use in commerce.


So if there are fewer bitcoins in China, but the same amount of demand to use bitcoins for the same purpose that the bitcoins that left China were used for, then the price goes up. What is so difficult about supply and demand for you to understand?



371. Post 5121768 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

And maybe the Chinese guy doesn't want to stay in China and maybe if he leaves, he wants to take his wealth with him. Maybe some other guy wants to stay in China and profit from selling his bitcoins to the guy who DOES want to leave. This seems so obvious to me, that there must be some communication problem we are having or you lack a basic understanding of economics.  

Many people break laws if it's in their best interest to do so and the risk/reward ratio is acceptable. It's not wrong to do so if the laws they break are unjust laws. If they can avoid capital controls legally by finding a loophole or if they can evade capital controls illegally that shouldn't justly be illegal, then on the margins, people will do so.

Unjust laws are broken far more frequently than just laws, because most people are good people. That's why victimless crimes like gambling, prostitution, drugs, smuggling, and tax evasion are so difficult to enforce. Most of the time they are even unreported.  Theft, assault, murder, etc have victims, real victims, and are actively prevented and prosecuted by the potential victims as well as the government.




372. Post 5122017 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 13, 2014, 03:45:55 PM
  But since bitcoins have no intrinsic value, the material wealth of China would not change. There would be still the same amount of food and cars in the Chinese market, and the same amount of Yuan in circulation inside China.

Intrinsic value is meaningless in terms of price. Air has intrinsic value. We need it to breath, yet it has no price. Dollars have no intrinsic value, but we use them because they are the most liquid commodity for trade. The reason why dollars are the most liquid commodity for trade is irrelevant. If there was another reason, that reason would suffice. If there was no other reason, something else would be money.

Like gold, bitcoin is recognizable, portable, divisible fungible and scarce. it can be used as a medium of exchange. These properties make it valuable to some people. The fact that it is valuable to some people make it valuable to other people. Intrinsic value is not a useful concept if you want to understand money. It is a harmful distraction.



373. Post 5122236 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 13, 2014, 04:17:38 PM
So if there are fewer bitcoins in China, but the same amount of demand to use bitcoins for the same purpose that the bitcoins that left China were used for, then the price goes up.

Yes, the price of bitcoins will go up (if it is not offset by speculators dumping).

But we were discussing "capital evasion", not price; and I showed that using bitcoins as the Forbes article described does not amount to capital evasion; rather the opposite.  That is why the Chinese government has not tried to stop it.

With the current internal restrictions, prices, and mining activity, I believe that bitcoin is siphoning real wealth from the rest of the world to China.  But not much - much less than a million dollars per day, I woudl say.


First off, your assumption that the Chinese government understands all the implications of Bitcoin is questionable. 2nd, government policies do not always have their intended effects. Often the opposite is true. Thirdly, capital flows in both directions so the hypothetical scenario could just as easily be someone trying to get wealth INTO China.




374. Post 5122552 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 13, 2014, 03:48:01 PM
Obviously you are wrong, because according to you, 95% of November rally price is from China and it hasn't dropped to 5% of ATH yet, or is that what you are  predicting? If I lived in China, I'd be a hodler. Moreso than now even. I can do international wire xfers. The Chinese can't. Bitcoin can be spent almost anywhere. The renmimbi can only be spent in China.

I will happily accept your RMB.

LOL you're like that really smart kid in the front of the class who finds fault with the oversimplification of the idea I give to the slower learners.

And you're right, our student doesn't really understand the definition of "zero-sum".

Mining is a break-even proposition, which means half the mining makes a profit and the other half loses money. Bitcoins are produced, so there is a positive sum.



375. Post 5122798 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: Richy_T on February 13, 2014, 04:52:24 PM
One has to give Gox some credit actually. At least this time they are Goxxing everyone before the rally rather than during it.

What's funny is that the Gox announcement has a worse effect on the price than the DDOS attack, at least so far. We've had so much bad news, we are growing immune.



376. Post 5123138 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 13, 2014, 05:05:55 PM
...assumption that the Chinese government understands all the implications of Bitcoin is questionable.

The Chinese government is incredibly conservative in outlook.  Any potential for transformative change is threatening.  They are institutionally very ill-equipped to deal with technical innovation with the potential to change relative power structures, and they are deeply, deeply antipathetic to such innovation.  The inner circles of the CCP form a network of extremely wealthy families, which have co-opted the interests of their society in a superlative fashion.  Defectors from their ranks will be required in order for bitcoin to get any sort of sanction.  Historical materialism may motivate defections.  It's ideology is pervasive in the CCP, and it forms a potent argument for the inevitability of socioeconomic transformation driven by technological change.  I find it difficult to assess the importance of this motivation.  Certainly it will only affect a very small minority of the power players, but if it affected a critical few, it would become an important factor in events.


Yes, power structures will be disrupted. It won't be easy. It won't be pretty, and it won't be overnight, but it is inevitable. The only way to avoid that is for the elite to adopt the technology first, but they are too conservative to do that.



377. Post 5123428 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 13, 2014, 05:12:36 PM
When the guy disburses his supply of Yuan to the other traders, that increases supply and devalues it (a little).

It only moves Yuan from a Chinese pocket to other Chinese pockets.  The total amount of Yuan in China remains the same.

Most Governments dislike their currency being exported because any foreign bank or government that gathers enough of it can manipulate their exchange rates, import/export balance,  and inflation.   Some governments try hard to limit export of their currency, others may just live with it, others may have other motives to encourage it.

1) Pretty sure the Chinese power structure cares which Chinese pockets the Yuan is in.
2) Due to fractional reserve lending, the money supply is increased when loans are made and decreased when loans are paid off, so exchange rates could be affected even with no yuan leaving the country. They could counter this effect by manipulating interest rates, but perhaps they don't want to due to unintended consequences.

So weird that they seem unconcerned with the real estate bubble and are concerned with Bitcoin instead. Central planners...



378. Post 5123661 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 13, 2014, 05:36:39 PM
Anyone else feeling like it's only a matter of time before the heavy dumping starts today?

don't base your trading on your feelings
I do FEEL the pressure to sell, so i buy.

<-- crazy

+1



379. Post 5126743 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Goes down, I buy more. If this keeps up, I'm gonna be in that lofty 1000 people that own 47% of the coins!



380. Post 5133056 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

It's weird how the pain of buying something that goes down in price is so much more intense than the pain of not buying something that went up in price. Opportunity costs are just as real, but they don't feel as real.

Long term hodlers are still hodling and it's just the newbs who are selling. Wealth disparity is maintained but the commies will bitch about it when the price recovers. Hodling in times like this is why I know I've earned my coins and the few new buyers who take advantage will have earned their place in the pantheon.  

Scary? yes. Could go down more? yes. Could crash and never recover? yes. It's possible us early adopters just got lucky to get as far as we have, but it's also possible that we understand some things that the rest don't.  Don't buy bitcoin because I bought bitcoin. Buy it for the reasons I bought it.

Bitcoin is the best opportunity I have seen in my lifetime to make the world a better place and possibly profit in doing so. The risks are high but the possible rewards are much, much higher.



381. Post 5133250 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on February 14, 2014, 03:05:46 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHUbLv4ThOo sadly this soothes me during these times Cheesy

I like it.



382. Post 5133441 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: spooderman on February 14, 2014, 03:22:19 AM


You don't have to be a bear to see that's pretty damn funny.



383. Post 5133481 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: deadfi$h on February 14, 2014, 03:31:36 AM
Holy crap. I almost just gave myself a heart attack catching Bitstamp's falling knife at $550. I probably shouldn't keep doing that  Shocked

Did the same thing at Coinbase. What the hell, I can't be wrong every time.



384. Post 5133738 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Too early to call a double bottom?



385. Post 5133781 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: Vigil on February 14, 2014, 03:55:42 AM
Bitstamp and BTC-e haven't moved, while gox hit $300. I can't buy until coinbase goes down

It's not gonna. That's why we need a real exchange in America. Fast drops and fast pops, Coinbase lags and you never get the best price.



386. Post 5133974 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 14, 2014, 04:03:01 AM

Ahh, thanks for this. That is my second favourite bitcoin song ever. Also very fitting due to the inclement conditions lately.

However, my top favourite of all time remains this -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yc6Hp_Zq3rU

Do not despair, bitcoin may or may not be the one, but in the end, at least satoshi has given us the framework to come up with a solution to the global social problem.

This is not a get rich quick scheme. It's a war.

Catchy!  It looks like after a few strategic retreats, we are holding the line for now. It's a war of attrition, and a debt-based system cannot win against us. We can wait.



387. Post 5134005 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: smoothie on February 14, 2014, 04:15:17 AM
Too early to call a double bottom?

lol too early perhaps. I guess I was right on my $600 call....muahahahahaha  Grin Grin Grin

I know, Smoothie. Congratulations, but I may be right also about my $1500 call. Prolly not, but two weeks is a long time in Bitcoinland.



388. Post 5134126 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: Searing on February 14, 2014, 04:25:48 AM
btc-e spiked down to 522, then back up according to bitcoinwisdom


hmmm theres the rub...if you drank the kool aid on Bitcoin assumptions....then anything under $1k is a deal in the long term..i should get
some balls and buy big time.....esp at these prices.....

hmm......or at least if it all blows up go out with a bang so to speak


Bitcoin 'all the drama of a korean soap oprea"

Searing


If you haven't prepared for this, buy the time you get in, the price will be much different.



389. Post 5134175 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 14, 2014, 04:28:32 AM
Bitstamp and BTC-e haven't moved, while gox hit $300. I can't buy until coinbase goes down

It's not gonna. That's why we need a real exchange in America. Fast drops and fast pops, Coinbase lags and you never get the best price.

You guys have coinsetter.  Doesn't it have an API to BSP?

I need something with more volume.  A big, professional exchange.



390. Post 5134385 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 14, 2014, 04:36:42 AM
Bitstamp and BTC-e haven't moved, while gox hit $300. I can't buy until coinbase goes down

It's not gonna. That's why we need a real exchange in America. Fast drops and fast pops, Coinbase lags and you never get the best price.

You guys have coinsetter.  Doesn't it have an API to BSP?

I need something with more volume.  A big, professional exchange.

If it has an API to stamp and order execution on stamp that's all you need.  Unless you are looking for NASDAQ?

I'll check it out, but I'm still concerned that Stamp is in Slovenia and New York has the regulation issue up in the air. Coinbase has $31 million behind it, and even though their prices and fees suck, but they seem more reliable for now.

Plenty of fear left, but the panic is over. I''m no TA expert, but without more bad news, it seems like the double bottom is in.






391. Post 5134411 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: nanobtc on February 14, 2014, 04:40:03 AM
Searing, didn't see anyone directly answer this. Coinbase is more of a broker. They buy (presumably) from Bitstamp on your behalf, plus fees. On very busy times they have run out of coins to sell to you. You can hook it into your bank, so whatever price you buy/sell is usually locked in then. It takes 4 business days, give or take for it to happen.

Gox/btc-e/Bitstamp are exchanges, where you transfer fiat to it in whatever way works for you and is set up for them. This takes varying amounts of time. You can usually transfer btc directly in much faster, but I'm not sure about Gox right now.

The exchanges let you keep money sitting on there. You can buy/sell back and forth within minutes/seconds. The btc can be sent out to an external address, or the fiat can be removed via whatever method the exchange allows (plus "bank time").

Coinbase also wants to be an online wallet for you, and also has some nice SMS/text methods that work on any phone, no app required.

That basically correct. Coinbase used to get most of it's coins from miners, but that is apparently no longer the case. Make of that what you will.



392. Post 5134498 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: magicmexican on February 14, 2014, 04:53:20 AM
Bitstamp bull trap. 

So everything that is up is a bulltrap, right? The only legit market non-trap move is the crash to 0 it seems

A trap is something you don't expect. I'm pretty sure every bull left is prepared for anything.  



393. Post 5134612 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

The Gox announcement was bad, but the transaction malleability DDOS was much worse and left a smaller dent. Without another disaster, the worst is behind us. If we follow the pattern of earlier rallies, and corrections, we slowly build upward momentum from here, but nothing parabolic for a while.



394. Post 5134742 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: MoreFun on February 14, 2014, 05:16:40 AM
The Gox announcement was bad, but the transaction malleability DDOS was much worse and left a smaller dent. Without another disaster, the worst is behind us. If we follow the pattern of earlier rallies, and corrections, we slowly build upward momentum from here, but nothing parabolic for a while.

I don't believe, volume was very low below $600.

No, it wasn't, but it sure as hell was this time and it's still going up. who's gonna panic sell now that hasn't sold already? Who's gonna dump now except for profit takers? The only thing that would bring us back down is more bad news and it would have to be more than FUD.

 



395. Post 5134834 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: seleme on February 14, 2014, 05:29:19 AM
The Gox announcement was bad, but the transaction malleability DDOS was much worse and left a smaller dent. Without another disaster, the worst is behind us. If we follow the pattern of earlier rallies, and corrections, we slowly build upward momentum from here, but nothing parabolic for a while.

I don't believe, volume was very low below $600.

No, it wasn't, but it sure as hell was this time and it's still going up. who's gonna panic sell now that hasn't sold already? Who's gonna dump now except for profit takers? The only thing that would bring us back down is more bad news and it would have to be more than FUD.

 

Never underestimate Bitcoin traders, they'll buy or sell when you think there's no chance in hell one would do it.

There's an overlap between traders and investors. It can create a ratchet effect if they are on net long term bulls, as I believe most short and intermediate term bears are. That four year log chart is compelling.



396. Post 5134898 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: MoreFun on February 14, 2014, 05:32:24 AM
The Gox announcement was bad, but the transaction malleability DDOS was much worse and left a smaller dent. Without another disaster, the worst is behind us. If we follow the pattern of earlier rallies, and corrections, we slowly build upward momentum from here, but nothing parabolic for a while.

I don't believe, volume was very low below $600.

No, it wasn't, but it sure as hell was this time and it's still going up. who's gonna panic sell now that hasn't sold already? Who's gonna dump now except for profit takers? The only thing that would bring us back down is more bad news and it would have to be more than FUD.

 

There was 5k below $600, less than 1k below $550. Not a lot. I was arquing upward momentum, not much more dumping. Also there was not a lot of people awake in EU (middle of the night).

There isn't a lot of upward momentum yet, but when the glitch is fixed and withdrawals resume, it will come.



397. Post 5134969 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: surfer43 on February 14, 2014, 05:43:56 AM
The Gox announcement was bad, but the transaction malleability DDOS was much worse and left a smaller dent. Without another disaster, the worst is behind us. If we follow the pattern of earlier rallies, and corrections, we slowly build upward momentum from here, but nothing parabolic for a while.

I don't believe, volume was very low below $600.

No, it wasn't, but it sure as hell was this time and it's still going up. who's gonna panic sell now that hasn't sold already? Who's gonna dump now except for profit takers? The only thing that would bring us back down is more bad news and it would have to be more than FUD.

 

There was 5k below $600, less than 1k below $550. Not a lot. I was arquing upward momentum, not much more dumping. Also there was not a lot of people awake in EU (middle of the night).

There isn't a lot of upward momentum yet, but when the glitch is fixed and withdrawals resume, it will come.
Do you think it will be fixed soon?

Within days at most. The people working on it know the stakes.



398. Post 5135029 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Holy crap! $49 spread between Coinbase ad Stamp!  Coinbase is in San Francisco, where the core development team is based, so it appears the smart money is very bullish. New money piling in with linked bank accounts.



399. Post 5135051 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 14, 2014, 05:49:31 AM
Here's a question:

What happens to your nation's currency when you go "all in" on bitcoin?

Meaning, the government of said nation (Cypress? Singapore?) fully embraces bitcoin and allows banks to freely exchange their national currency for bitcoins.

The specific question I have is: would that make the relative value of that nation's currency rise or fall versus all the other nations?

If there was a fixed price, then the currency would skyrocket, but that would be bad for exporters and a trade deficit would grow.

If there was a floating rate, then investment capital would flow in like a spring flood.




400. Post 5135457 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

There was a lot of downward momentum. It's gonna take a while for the train to pick up speed in the other direction.



401. Post 5135530 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: surfer43 on February 14, 2014, 06:37:49 AM
I'm taking a long position @ 392   Smiley

392 oz of gold? I'll sell you my $10,000 motorcycle for 10 BTC if it ever got that low.

The bottom is in, Boys.  We'd need a completely new disaster to take it lower.  



402. Post 5135681 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: zby on February 14, 2014, 06:50:49 AM

...

The bottom is in, Boys.  We'd need a completely new disaster to take it lower.  

Bold statement!

I called it Feb 10th on the Gox announcement. That was before the DDOS attack, so I was almost wrong, but if you don't count Gox (and you shouldn't), then we hang around this level until the transaction ID patch is implemented and then start chugging back up.

Of course some completely different calamity could make me wrong (alien invasion, zombie apocalypse, Paul Krugman sex change operation...).



403. Post 5135706 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: surfer43 on February 14, 2014, 06:51:05 AM
I'm taking a long position @ 392   Smiley

392 oz of gold? I'll sell you my $10,000 motorcycle for 10 BTC if it ever got that low.

The bottom is in, Boys.  We'd need a completely new disaster to take it lower.  
on btc.sx (where they use gox)  Tongue

Coindesk price index.  



404. Post 5135847 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 14, 2014, 07:11:40 AM
I'm hoping 588 is not a bull trap.  It's ok though it's just one position of many. 

For me, catching the falling knives is the easy part. It's knowing when to throw them back that's hard. Resistance at ~$500 has been tested twice, and held up under extreme conditions. This is the range we are in unless some other factor comes into play.



405. Post 5135931 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 14, 2014, 07:21:21 AM
I'm hoping 588 is not a bull trap.  It's ok though it's just one position of many. 

For me, catching the falling knives is the easy part. It's knowing when to throw them back that's hard. Resistance at ~$500 has been tested twice, and held up under extreme conditions. This is the range we are in unless some other factor comes into play.

We have gone to $100 on two different exchanges this week. I hold no confidence in 500 or any other number.  

confidence and profit usually are mutually exclusive.



406. Post 5136008 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: OldGeek on February 14, 2014, 07:29:05 AM
Seems to be a lot of sell pressure on the western exchanges.

Are you worried that you'll get your cheap coins faster than you wanted to?  



407. Post 5136097 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: OldGeek on February 14, 2014, 07:34:42 AM
Seems to be a lot of sell pressure on the western exchanges.

Are you worried that you'll get your cheap coins faster than you wanted to?  

Nope.  Just an observation.  Cheap is relative.

The Orient is dragging down the West, but there is a limit to how much effect this has. Trading this time of night is a good opportunity to catch a bounce from Chinese fear to Western greed.



408. Post 5136238 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: scarass on February 14, 2014, 07:44:10 AM
I'm thinking of buying a nice bunch of coins but dont know if I dare to transfer FIAT to Gox? Or should I go with Stamp?

If Gox fixes their BTC withdrawals problem before they fix their fiat withdrawal problems, the price there will go vertical, but I doubt you would be able to get your money there to trade before this happens. Even if it does, your fiat profits would be trapped for however long it takes to get it out, possibly forever.

Try to get your money to whichever exchange will let you buy before this transaction malleability problem gets fixed. I'm guessing you don't have much time.



409. Post 5136355 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Nice little bounce.



410. Post 5136599 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Markets hate uncertainty. Opportunity is inversely proportional to safety.

Gox's problem got worse and drug the other markets down. If Gox's problems get better, it will likely have the opposite effect. Mark will fix the (BTC) withdrawal problem. He knows he'll get jail time or murdered if he doesn't.



411. Post 5136718 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: Asrael999 on February 14, 2014, 08:33:09 AM
BTC will shoot up when clear signs appear that withdrawals will be enabled again.

Yes and the cheap coins on Gox will get dumped on stamp!


I know its a trifle naïve, but some people might actually buy them and hold onto them.
Unreasonable I know, but.........

Gox coins will be cheap for about 17 seconds before they get really expensive. The market can handle a few hundred dumped coins. The positive news effect will compensate. In the mean time, put some limit orders in to handle the churn.



412. Post 5136951 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on February 14, 2014, 08:57:34 AM
I've asked for a refund of Neptune last week, and got the money back today. Quick and professional customer service.
My main concern was that according to this calculator http://btcinvest.net/en/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php, the miner would need to come on line end of March at the latest to break even. I'll be watching KnC's foray into cloudhashing with interest, and maybe buy shares from them if they would appear to be at least a little profitable.

In the meantime, the fiat money that I got refunded got redirected strait back to Bitstamp, and if the price on Monday/Tuesday stays about the same as today, I will have made BTC6 of pure profit. Cheesy

...and pity that I won't have fresh fiat on the exchange for the week-end, as I expect we'll be re-testing the lows.

I call bullshit. If you really thought that, sell your coins there and buy back in cheaper.  

Here comes the FUD brigade, wanting cheap coins before the Big Fix. Sorry you missed the bottom, Guys, but it's in the rear view mirror.



413. Post 5137302 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: dreamspark on February 14, 2014, 09:25:40 AM
Cry another 400 dumped

I'm glad we are getting rid of you dumpers  Smiley

Do you think they instantly withdraw their money or do you think they buy back lower ?  Wink

Hmmmm. The great Doyle Brunson once said "You can shear a sheep many times, but you can skin him only once."

Somehow I think that applies.



414. Post 5137494 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on February 14, 2014, 09:34:32 AM
I've asked for a refund of Neptune last week, and got the money back today. Quick and professional customer service.
My main concern was that according to this calculator http://btcinvest.net/en/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php, the miner would need to come on line end of March at the latest to break even. I'll be watching KnC's foray into cloudhashing with interest, and maybe buy shares from them if they would appear to be at least a little profitable.

In the meantime, the fiat money that I got refunded got redirected strait back to Bitstamp, and if the price on Monday/Tuesday stays about the same as today, I will have made BTC6 of pure profit. Cheesy

...and pity that I won't have fresh fiat on the exchange for the week-end, as I expect we'll be re-testing the lows.

I call bullshit. If you really thought that, sell your coins there and buy back in cheaper.  

Here comes the FUD brigade, wanting cheap coins before the Big Fix. Sorry you missed the bottom, Guys, but it's in the rear view mirror.

Please, choose your accusations more carefully.

I am in the mode, where I play with 3-4 BTC, the rest gets moved to cold storage or waits for a spike in preset high sell orders. In January I decided that I will not sell a single coin at lower than what I bought it for, so more and more coins got locked out from trading by that decision, on the other hand, I had 0 losses and a few BTC gains. And another part of my strategy is to remove a fraction of BTC to cold storage each week.

On the other hand, I've been transferring fresh fiat to the exchange and buying each week on the way down, and I am almost, but not entirely out of fiat on the exchange. If you read my message correctly, I said that it was a pity that refund money didn't come earlier, because I am fully aware that we are near or at a bottom. The refund money will be converted back to BTC next week whatever the price (another of my decisions was to buy for at least 80% of fresh fiat immediately upon deposit), but you should agree that it's always a nice bonus when it's done at a bottom.

I am also of the opinion that this week-end will see a flash-crash, as we are still in the down-trend, so my remaining fiat is locked accordingly in the preset buy limit orders.

Pretty much everybody like me bought near the bottom, sold over $600, and are waiting to scoop 'em up again if that happens. There may indeed be a retest of the lows, but normal FUD won't take us all the way there. Only a new inbound bombshell would do that.



415. Post 5137608 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: F-bernanke on February 14, 2014, 09:46:12 AM
Bitstamp to resume withdrawals later today:
Quote
Dear Bitstamp clients,

A denial-of-service attack caused us to suspend the processing of Bitcoin withdrawals. Bitstamp, with help from the Bitcoin core developers, has implemented a solution that passes our preliminary tests and audits.

After additional testing, we plan to enable Bitcoin withdraws later today.

Thank you for your understanding!

Best regards,

The Bitstamp team

Finally, this is what the market needed!

It sets up some pretty big expectations. If they don't deliver and we go into another Chinese day of trading, I will be wrong about calling the bottom. But if they do deliver, CCMF!!!



416. Post 5137814 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on February 14, 2014, 09:55:47 AM
Bitstamp to resume withdrawals later today:
Quote
Dear Bitstamp clients,

A denial-of-service attack caused us to suspend the processing of Bitcoin withdrawals. Bitstamp, with help from the Bitcoin core developers, has implemented a solution that passes our preliminary tests and audits.

After additional testing, we plan to enable Bitcoin withdraws later today.

Thank you for your understanding!

Best regards,

The Bitstamp team

Finally, this is what the market needed!

It sets up some pretty big expectations. If they don't deliver and we go into another Chinese day of trading, I will be wrong about calling the bottom. But if they do deliver, CCMF!!!

what do you think this initial new shock does to the east coast. I'm think we head for 700 and hit a wall of bear... the buying is starting it seems

It won't be bears, but profit takers who slow the momentum. I doubt we will immediately rise above the level of $755 on Feb Ninth before the MtGox announcement, regardless of whether or not Gox also fixes the problem. 800s on Monday at the absolute highest. and if this patch fizzles...look out below.



417. Post 5137904 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

$100 swing down and back up in 14 hours!  



418. Post 5138561 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: adamas on February 14, 2014, 10:47:23 AM

Post it in MtGox thread.... this thread no longer concerns Gox,

+1

+2



419. Post 5139654 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: seljo on February 14, 2014, 12:29:55 PM
I just sent some fiat to gox am I insane?  Huh

No, but you're playing it risky. From a bitcoin trader, that's saying something!



420. Post 5140615 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Good Morning, East Coast!  Someone reeeealy doesn't want that 1 HR moving average to cross on stamp. Good luck with that.



421. Post 5144989 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 11, 2014, 12:59:45 AM
That was the bottom of the bear market. I've seen it several times before and that's what it looked like.  You can quote me on that.

note: this was before the DDOS attack ,and except for Gox, I NAILED IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

note: I sold the bounce and bought the DDOS dip too!!!!!




422. Post 5145260 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: CookieFactory on February 14, 2014, 05:58:32 PM
That was the bottom of the bear market. I've seen it several times before and that's what it looked like.  You can quote me on that.

note: this was before the DDOS attack ,and except for Gox, I NAILED IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

note: I sold the bounce and bought the DDOS dip too!!!!!



lol no

Suck it. I now have another months worth of profits to wait out the next ATH.  Bring on the FUD. It's just noise now.



423. Post 5145471 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 14, 2014, 05:57:21 PM
note: this was before the DDOS attack ,and except for Gox, I NAILED IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Except you didn't call the bottom for any exchange since the bottom was 2 days later. You've mysteriously disqualified what you believe is a "ddos attack" from being the bottom? Are we certain a few hours ago was even the bottom; you don't want to wait a day or so to declare that?

Of course then you are quick to tell us you bought the "ddos bottom" as well even though you seem convinced you're correct about the earlier dip being the "real" bottom. You're a true Scotsman. Kudos for being in the ballpark though, you deluded thing, you.

Stamp (Biggest western exchange) and Coinbase where I buy and sell. That's what counts. We ain't speaking Chinese. Feb 10, Stamp low was 510 and last it was a $537 low. Check the thread posts for context. I fucking didn't back down off my call even with the volume made it look certain I was wrong.

Coinbase takes four days to pay out and there is no fiat account with them, so I literally had to ride my motorcycle to the bank and deposit everything I had down to my last $20 to buy the second dip. I balanced my checkbook for the first time in four years just so I could bet everything I had without bouncing a check. I let bills stack up to the end of their grace periods. I made only minimum payments on credit cards just to have the fiat to buy.

Kiss my ass, bears!!!!!!




424. Post 5145604 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: kkaspar on February 14, 2014, 06:05:46 PM
That was the bottom of the bear market. I've seen it several times before and that's what it looked like.  You can quote me on that.

note: this was before the DDOS attack ,and except for Gox, I NAILED IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

note: I sold the bounce and bought the DDOS dip too!!!!!



This is like yelling at the roulette table that you called red and won..

NOBODY else called it at the time. Everybody was scared shitless and even the people buying didn't call it the bottom. I did.

$530/BTC low on the 10th, $538 low last night.



425. Post 5146010 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: pietje on February 14, 2014, 06:28:17 PM
That was the bottom of the bear market. I've seen it several times before and that's what it looked like.  You can quote me on that.

note: this was before the DDOS attack ,and except for Gox, I NAILED IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

note: I sold the bounce and bought the DDOS dip too!!!!!



This is like yelling at the roulette table that you called red and won..

NOBODY else called it at the time. Everybody was scared shitless and even the people buying didn't call it the bottom. I did.

$530/BTC low on the 10th, $538 low last night.

gratz, now what?

We build momentum slowly until a critical mass is reached and we go parabolic or some other calamity shifts the direction temporarily down again. The point is no ponzi scheme could have survived the shit we just lived through. Bitcoin is the real deal.



426. Post 5146214 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: surfer43 on February 14, 2014, 06:57:12 PM
In case no one heard, btc withdrawals are on again at Stamp!

Eat it bears. One more bounce coming when Gox opens everything back up. Gox will go 700+ btce will go 750+

This is one of the best buying opportunities for this year.

I doubled my coins on this dip  Cool  

A lot of it was luck though rather than good trading sense...
With Bitcoin's volatility all you have to do is wait until you can sell higher than you bought or buy lower then you sold.  Cool

The poor bastards who sold at $50 after the April rally last year are going to be waiting a loooooooong time.



427. Post 5146492 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on February 14, 2014, 07:08:21 PM

We build momentum slowly until a critical mass is reached and we go parabolic or some other calamity shifts the direction temporarily down again. The point is no ponzi scheme could have survived the shit we just lived through. Bitcoin is the real deal.
You weren't here in 2011, this is nothing but a little scrubbing under nails cleaning up a little.
Even if you invested 3 months ago this still looks like a bull market.

I was here in 2011. That's how I had the courage to bet it all.  I'm only fiat poor ;-)



428. Post 5146543 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: windjc on February 14, 2014, 07:04:53 PM
People laughed at me when i started shortin @ 840$ . I can live with that.

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Yeah but it snapped back on your ass. You finally sold your shorts for a meager profit before buying back. While you were out you went silent like a slug.  Now you are short again, except this time you are going to sell for a loss or stop out soon as Gox reopens withdrawals and we bounce again. You'll probably give up a fiat bit of the profits you made on the first trade.

Well i stated a few hours ago that i closed my shorts @ 580$ , which have been opened @ 840$, i also stated that i will short again between 650-690$, when the price was@630 which turned out to be not the badest idea so far. Do you have any kind of personal agenda with me? I´m pretty pleased with my profits, thanks again for askin?
Just keep on actin like a dick.

Of course I have a personal issue with you. You are annoying scum. I don't care that you don't believe in bitcoin and are here just to try and make a buck. I don't care that you are short. But I think you are dispicable as you constantly lie to try and manipulate the readers of his forum. You are the exact same scum that makes the btc-e troll box a fucking hell hole and you brought that same dark and twisted and extremely self serving and immature attitude and energy to this forum. And I hate you for it.

You are a dark person and not at all well. You are certainly not the type of person I would welcome into my home or advise my loved ones to associate with. You pretty much represent the lowest common denominator of individual in the bitcoin space.

Dayum! I put that clown on ignore a long time back, but that's a powerful rant! I would think the same way if I thought about him at all, which I don't. Well said.



429. Post 5148042 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: 7thKingdom on February 14, 2014, 08:31:46 PM
When it gets boring for most people, this is when I find the market most interesting.

The stuff last night and this morning was fun, but it was predictable.  Most people paying attention bought through the 500's and then sold through the 600's/700's this morning (if you're into that kinda quick profit... or else you bought through the 600's and 500's and are holding).

It was a pretty easy turnaround for those interested.  That said, now that the price has come back to earth a bit after the quick jump up to 720ish, this is when things get interesting.  These are the times when imo it becomes difficult to gauge the market and predict which direction it's going to go.  Last night was childs play (in terms of making the smart move).  This is where the men separate themselves from the boys, being able to make the correct play right about now.

Unfortunately, I'm not sure I have any insight lol

Depends. Was the downward momentum interrupted or reversed? We will need new good news to keep going up. A fix from Gox, a new app, integration with some major product or company, etc. We would need real bad news, not just FUD, to go back down. Otherwise, we'll go sideways.

And screw you it was not child's play. It's easy to say that after the fact, but my net worth was down hundreds of thousands of dollars and shrinking by thousands more by the minute and I knew I should buy MORE, but was surrounded by fear and panic. Calling it child's play is insulting. The children were running, screaming and crying. The adults were buying when they felt like selling but thought differently than they felt. That's what adults do. They act on thoughts more than feelings.



430. Post 5148690 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: 7thKingdom on February 14, 2014, 09:04:57 PM
When it gets boring for most people, this is when I find the market most interesting.

The stuff last night and this morning was fun, but it was predictable.  Most people paying attention bought through the 500's and then sold through the 600's/700's this morning (if you're into that kinda quick profit... or else you bought through the 600's and 500's and are holding).

It was a pretty easy turnaround for those interested.  That said, now that the price has come back to earth a bit after the quick jump up to 720ish, this is when things get interesting.  These are the times when imo it becomes difficult to gauge the market and predict which direction it's going to go.  Last night was childs play (in terms of making the smart move).  This is where the men separate themselves from the boys, being able to make the correct play right about now.

Unfortunately, I'm not sure I have any insight lol

Depends. Was the downward momentum interrupted or reversed? We will need new good news to keep going up. A fix from Gox, a new app, integration with some major product or company, etc. We would need real bad news, not just FUD, to go back down. Otherwise, we'll go sideways.

And screw you it was not child's play. It's easy to say that after the fact, but my net worth was down hundreds of thousands of dollars and shrinking by thousands more by the minute and I knew I should buy MORE, but was surrounded by fear and panic. Calling it child's play is insulting. The children were running, screaming and crying. The adults were buying when they felt like selling but thought differently than they felt. That's what adults do. They act on thoughts more than feelings.

Sorry to offend you, I meant in terms of rational thought, it was in fact childs play.  You say so yourself.  The rational decision was 100% to buy.

It may take some decent sized balls to put your money where your mouth is and actually do it, but I was more strictly speaking in terms of predicting the market.  It was easy to predict whereabouts to start buying during the plunge down and that it would slingshot back up (although I'll admit I fully underestimated just how high and started selling sooner than I would have liked, I still moved a decent amount over 700).  Just as it was pretty easy to see it would shift back down to where it is now after it rebounded so quickly.

All those calls were relatively easy imo.  Having the fortitude to stick with them may be a different story, but the calls themselves were practically punching people in the face if they were paying attention.

The "this is where the men separate themselves from the boy" comment was more referring to being able to properly see where the market is likely to go now, which imo is much less clear than the fun exciting movement of the previous 20ish hours.

In terms of gutchecks and being able to put emotion aside, yeah, the fast action certainly will test that.

I don't have any special insight there. This market seems to be slower to react to things than I am in frustratingly different rates and at different times. If there is no new good news this weekend, we will possibly drift to a low that is loosely around 600 before heading back up. There's really no way of knowing without knowledge of what developments in software, politics and finance will unfold. If you sold  a little over $700, standing pat seems as good a position as any.



431. Post 5150162 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

So hypothetically, if a coordinated group of market manipulators infiltrated some forums, spreading FUD, what might that tell us about their position? Could it be that we have lots of coins and they don't? That prolly sucks for them. Damn. If ooooonly they had gotten in a little earlier, they would have all those coins instead of us. Must not seem fair.

But what if we didn't fall for it? Man, that would suck even worse. Now they would be not only wasting their time, but showing us just how badly they want something they can't have. Something we have. Bummer.



432. Post 5154502 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: pjviitas on February 15, 2014, 05:52:58 AM
So where is the bottom in this market?

I get the funny feeling it won't be until GOX dies

The bottom is in. The lows from here on out will be higher than previous lows, but we're not going up substantially either. Not for a while unless something major happens.



433. Post 5154992 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: pjviitas on February 15, 2014, 06:50:42 AM
So where is the bottom in this market?

I get the funny feeling it won't be until GOX dies

The bottom is in. The lows from here on out will be higher than previous lows, but we're not going up substantially either. Not for a while unless something major happens.

so do you actually think gox is going to survive this?

For Bitcoin, it doesn't matter. I suspect they will limp along, continuing to lose market share until they either are forced to close or become so irrelevant that people stop asking questions like that. But they could come back from the dead again. I've seen it happen several times before.

What matters is that Gox is priced in. If your coins and fiat are on other exchanges, it'll be a slow uneven road back to new all time highs in a few months, not matter what happens with Gox. Gox cannot do much more harm than it already has, but it could help.




434. Post 5155037 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

An almost perfect example of a cup and handle formation on the bitstamp 3 minute chart! 



435. Post 5155129 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: Richy_T on February 15, 2014, 07:26:01 AM
My god, I'm starting to want the price to go up just so we can see the back of these stupid doom trolls more than anything else.

I doubt that will get rid of them. It hasn't any other time. Their envy is palpable. Their presence is the price of our success.



436. Post 5155160 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on February 15, 2014, 07:29:34 AM
I just love bitcoin more everyday, people lost in the quick greed, miss the fact were building up to a financial revolution.

I know, right? It's hilarious when I try to explain that it might take a whole year to triple your money. I'm really not used to being the voice of reason, caution and patience. i must be getting old.



437. Post 5155165 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 15, 2014, 07:33:03 AM
Ok I bought at 646.  Time to go up.  Lets see if I get plastered on this one  Cheesy

$1 to the good so far!



438. Post 5155230 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: Yololintian on February 15, 2014, 07:39:00 AM
Willie is back dumping 100s of coins every few minutes on gox. I have a theory that this whole crash is being caused by one early adopter that put way too much faith in gox, leaving thousands of coins in there, and he fears they don't actually have his coins now so he's selling to be able to get something back when they default.

gotta love newbies. You think that's an original theory?



439. Post 5155252 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on February 15, 2014, 07:42:14 AM
I just love bitcoin more everyday, people lost in the quick greed, miss the fact were building up to a financial revolution.

we can worry about decentralized currency later....right now I'm trying to make a quick buck and buying on the downs seems like a very reasonable investment opportunity. HOLDing is great, more power to you, but where is the fun in that?

I tell fonzie every-time his fud aligns with a crash, that if he's making money shorting great, my issues are the doom he spreads as if this is just a beanie baby styled fad. I am all for people day trading as well.  I bought coins and just wanted to hold em for a minimum of a year, my first bull prediction got blown out of the water for 1k coins by June. Wish I hadn't tried to Dollar cost average in during October.

My buddy told me he was discussing crypto with people at his work (security) someone got in at $5 for 200 coins, and sold them all at $100 hope it wasn't cause he thought we were doomed for single or double digits Cheesy

Don't feed the trolls.



440. Post 5155307 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: Richy_T on February 15, 2014, 07:49:44 AM

Don't feed the trolls.

Yes. Note that I didn't quote or refer to any troll directly. Sometimes it's hard to resist but overall, it's the best policy.

The aim of a troll is to get any response, good or bad. Anything you do or say is a victory in their twisted minds.

"I tell fonzie every-time his fud aligns with a crash, that if he's making money shorting great, my issues are the doom he spreads as if this is just a beanie baby styled fad. "




441. Post 5155332 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: ChrisML on February 15, 2014, 07:49:01 AM
My emotions are telling me to buy back in BIG right now.  Shocked

But my gut says I need to wait a little bit more.

So, yeah... I am waiting. And I fucking hate waiting.

Guess I was doing pretty well by not stepping in.

Got back from work and it already dropped to $380.


That sounds so alien to those of us trading real bitcoins on real exchanges. The price is so out of whack. Perhaps we need an exclusively gox wall observer to avoid the confusion.



442. Post 5155352 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: hmmmstrange on February 15, 2014, 07:54:47 AM
Willie is back dumping 100s of coins every few minutes on gox. I have a theory that this whole crash is being caused by one early adopter that put way too much faith in gox, leaving thousands of coins in there, and he fears they don't actually have his coins now so he's selling to be able to get something back when they default.

If you have a bunch of money and you have a good (but small fraction of your overall wealth) amount of coins on Gox and you're pissed off with them and you expect you're probably not going to see your coins or fiat ever again, it might be tempting to dump just to make Gox look even more ridiculous.

This is the most likely reason.

I respectfully disagree. Trading fake money for fake coins is either just a video game or a way to manipulate the real markets.



443. Post 5155500 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

ok, here's a hypothesis I haven't seen before: Mark is not intentionally manipulating anything and not profiting from Gox's troubles. Instead, he's just a bad manager and it's one or more of his underlings who are exploiting their inside knowledge and/or influence without his knowledge or consent. Whaddya think?

The guy's a programmer and obviously not a "people" person.



444. Post 5155649 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: creekbore on February 15, 2014, 07:57:06 AM
 It's going to be a rocky few weeks/months IMHO and although BTC is extremely resilient, it will only succeed by its supporters being positive and engaging its critics, not simply taking refuge in a static point of view or being personally aggressive.

Legit critics are one thing, but we have finite resources, so we have to attempt to distinguish between trolls, sophists, and the rare fertile mind where the seed of knowledge may take root.




445. Post 5155862 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: medialab101 on February 15, 2014, 08:48:03 AM
That seems like good news. Patch today, testing tomorrow, possibly withdrawals reinstituted by Monday...

And all the time no break in trading... only change is that Bitcoin deposits are stalled for 6 hours... and who in their right mind would deposit Bitcoin now.

Should be good news, but it sets up expectations. If Gox fails to live up to those expectations (again), it's worse than if they had said nothing.

To answer your question, depositing bitcoin now would put you in a good position for when the withdrawals resume and the Gox discount once again becomes the Gox premium.




446. Post 5155927 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 15, 2014, 07:20:27 AM
An almost perfect example of a cup and handle formation on the bitstamp 3 minute chart! 

I'm either getting good at this or getting lucky!



447. Post 5156132 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: medialab101 on February 15, 2014, 09:07:43 AM

Quote
To answer your question, depositing bitcoin now would put you in a good position for when the withdrawals resume and the Gox discount once again becomes the Gox premium.

I agree with you buy most would say it's an insane risk because they may be insolvent and this whole debacle has just been a ruse to buy time.

Of course it's an insane risk, but that doesn't mean somebody won't try it. They might even succeed.




The Price at Bitstamp WILL NOT plummet if Gox resumes withdrawals. It might dip a little at most before the Gox price catches up and surpasses Stamp's.

Most people have no clue on how difficult it is to successfully arbitrage bitcoin. There is always some factor you haven't considered or are not even aware of that makes it unprofitable. Bitcoiners prolly have IQs on average roughly two standards of deviation above the mean. There's almost nothing you could come up with that somebody else hasn't already thought of.



448. Post 5156149 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: TERA on February 15, 2014, 09:21:28 AM
I'm tired of this bullstamp. where is bearstamp.

Translation: "I sold at a profit. Now I need more coins."



449. Post 5156232 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: Kramerc on February 15, 2014, 09:34:41 AM

Quote
To answer your question, depositing bitcoin now would put you in a good position for when the withdrawals resume and the Gox discount once again becomes the Gox premium.

I agree with you buy most would say it's an insane risk because they may be insolvent and this whole debacle has just been a ruse to buy time.

Of course it's an insane risk, but that doesn't mean somebody won't try it. They might even succeed.

Would it not be smarter to just arbitrage, selling the coins on stamp, sending money over at Gox and buying coins cheaply, waiting the price to skyrocket there? Why would one risk his bitcoins, when it would actually be safer (in case of MtGox being insolvent) to just wire fiat money?

Getting BTC in and out is MUCH less time consuming that fiat xfers. The price differential may disappear or even flip by the time you do that.



450. Post 5156261 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: F-bernanke on February 15, 2014, 09:36:29 AM

The Gox premium will be back in a heartbeat. However, anyone without some real stones of steel will be buying at any price to get out of the Gox trap.

I'm calling 1000$ coins (+-$50)  on Gox IF gox enables btc withdrawals, maybe we should set up a poll?

I'll take the under, but I don't think you're crazy.



451. Post 5156440 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 15, 2014, 09:46:38 AM
Since I believe that bitcoin is a terrible investment, I think that will be a good thing; but it will depress the price even further over the next few weeks.

Funny, a lot of people who think bitcoin is a wonderful investment want the price to go down also. They want MOAR.


What would it take for you to admit you're wrong about Bitcoin, Jorge? What set of conditions? What would have to happen?



452. Post 5156775 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 15, 2014, 10:11:14 AM
What would it take for you to admit you're wrong about Bitcoin, Jorge? What set of conditions? What would have to happen?

For starters, bitcoiners would have to find a way to get rid of all altcoins, present and future. Including AppleCoin, WellsFargoCoin, WalmartCoin, ...

Perhaps they can find corrupt congressmen that will accept bribes in bitcoin and pass laws criminalizing the use of other coins?  Wink


LOL. So we would have to prevent something that doesn't exist yet? How do you know we haven't already done the through the magic of "market incentives"? If those corpcoins were truly decentralized, distributed and peer-to-peer, they would convey no advantage.  To the extent they would convey advantage, they would be to that extent less popular. Which may be why you don't see any.

So I would have to wait an infinite amount of time for you to admit you were wrong?

As for present alt-coins, why do they make you doubt Bitcoin? Success always has imitators.



453. Post 5156840 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: TERA on February 15, 2014, 10:22:03 AM
I'm tired of this bullstamp. where is bearstamp.

We've been going down for 2 months. At what point is it enough for you? When all the investors left and nobody is will to buy coins anymore? That good enough for you? Will that make you happy? Cheap coins right?
I see 2 weeks, not 2 months.

I NEVER get an answer to these questions. So when is it enough for you people? When we're at 1200 you guys scream down down down! At 800 the same. At 350. What's the point? What do you want? When is it enough?
400, or when i see a nice solid base form and not just this random $200 candle to the moon.

How could you tell the difference between a nice, solid base and the apparently nice solid base we had at $800?
That last candle wasn't random. I have almost no TA knowledge or experience and I could see it a mile off.



454. Post 5157146 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: TERA on February 15, 2014, 10:38:59 AM
the bottom is when the price smashes against a certain level for a good amount of time and there's an unlimited amount of support until it starts slowly creeping up. Like gox did at 300, and then there's multiple additional high volume tests and they are all supported at gradually increasingly higher levels, until an explosion happens. a huge vertical wall of support continues to build behind the action as a new base.

So how long is a "good amount of time" and what do you mean by "unlimited support"? We've smashed into the ~$530 level twice now (stamp), the second time with a lot more volume. Are you saying that can't be the floor or is it just too soon to tell in your opinion?



455. Post 5157338 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 15, 2014, 10:55:20 AM

The corporations would provide the blockchain processing and hold large stocks (maybe even infinite) of coins, using them to maintain price stability etc., and will collect fees from their use. Those corpcoins will look superficially like bitcoin in the way people will use them, but of course will not be anything like the libertarian dream.  For 99.9% of the population, that will not matter.

Or they could be issued by governments instead of corporations.

Or they could be something else entirely, who knows what governments, banks and stores may invent.
They have something else entirely NOW. I need to nail down what burden of proof exactly we're talking about because I don't want to waste my time if you are not even really open to the possibility that your belief is incorrect.


Quote
 they void the argument "one bitcoin will be worth a small fortune one day since there are only 21 million of them and umpteen trillion dollars of e-commerce per day".

There are many things wrong with that argument, but one of them is that there is an infinite number of cryptocoins, and they all are in principle as good as bitcoin for the purpose of low-fee payments via internet.

Umpteen trillion dollars divided by infinity is equal to zero...

You know our answer to that. The issue is whether or not the network effects are strong enough to prevent that scenario.


Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 15, 2014, 10:23:50 AM
So I would have to wait an infinite amount of time for you to admit you were wrong?

Quote
I will admit that I am wrong (about bitcoin being a terrible investment) when lots of people really start using bitcoins for payments, not because they want to support the cause but because they are more convenient and cheap than other methods.

This is already true in a very limited but growing number of cases.


Quote
As I see it, right now the bitcoin price is sustained mainly by speculation: by "hodlers" who will buy at even higher price if they had the money, by day traders who do not look beyond the next month or two, and by people who see it as a form of gambling.

I don't entirely disagree, but why is this a problem?



456. Post 5158392 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: T.Stuart on February 15, 2014, 12:25:48 PM
Waiting on Willy...  Cool

Just how many tricks does a bot have up its sleeve?

So let's assume I had 100 million worth of imaginary Gox coins. I could drag the whole exchange and then the other exchanges in the direction I wanted.  

or maybe some huge amounts of bitcoin are being laundered. or maybe a government is involved.

Really there are too many possibilities to even reasonably guess without more information.




457. Post 5158730 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: TERA on February 15, 2014, 12:41:06 PM
You know what I think is that Willy IS mtgox.

That would have to be quite a conspiracy. That would suggest Mark or somebody could do this without someone else in the company finding out or that the whole company is in on it.

But let's assume that's true. First they drove the price higher presumably to get more fiat and then are now driving it lower to get more coins, right?

Why not just operate as a fractional reserve? Some technical reason?

This will be an interesting story if we ever find out the truth.






458. Post 5158807 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: seldon on February 15, 2014, 01:01:37 PM
Could be governmental action.. they tend to be stupid often enough

No doubt, but what if it was just some monster dark pool order that couldn't be filled and was forced onto the open exchange?

Simplest solutions are most often correct, but either way this weird price action demands an explanation.




459. Post 5158849 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: seldon on February 15, 2014, 01:05:45 PM

If it is gox and they are not on fractional reserve why not simply send your coins to any other exchange and make a premium by arbitraging your own exchange?

Anyways, feels good that stamp don't give a shit anymore

that would leave a paper trail, or more accurately a blockchain trail.



460. Post 5158967 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

It just doesn't make sense for it to be Mark. Honest casinos make much more than crooked ones.  make billions legit or make 10s of millions and look over your shoulder the rest of your life?  

Remember the "London Whale" the trader who martingales a small loss into billions? Something like that would be my guess.



461. Post 5189557 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 14, 2014, 09:24:27 PM
If there is no new good news this weekend, we will possibly drift to a low that is loosely around 600 before heading back up. [/bold]

Yeah, that was me.



462. Post 5189753 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 17, 2014, 01:11:52 AM
If there is no new good news this weekend, we will possibly drift to a low that is loosely around 600 before heading back up.

Yeah, that was me.

What, no props? I nailed it again!!




463. Post 5189831 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

Quote from: theonewhowaskazu on February 17, 2014, 01:27:49 AM
If there is no new good news this weekend, we will possibly drift to a low that is loosely around 600 before heading back up.

Yeah, that was me.

What, no props? I nailed it again!!



Well, it hasnt drifted up all that much. We'll give you props when Gox doesn't fuck this up epicly and BTC starts rocketing on there.

That's not the call I made. You don't get it. We trade to acumulate BTC, not Fiat. If that's what you were doing and you followed my lead, you'd have those extra coins now. It doesn't matter what happens in the future, I was right. again. within $10.  BOOyah!

You're welcome ;-)



464. Post 5189872 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 17, 2014, 01:34:33 AM
it is unseemly to toot ones own horn bja


though I'm not sure who else is going to do it around here

LOL. Prolly true, but it's more unseemly to be wrong.



465. Post 5190345 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

So I wish I new how to show this, but I drew a line from the Dec 19 low on stamp to the Feb 9 low and it perfectly intersected the Feb 13 low, and it shows an upward slope.




466. Post 5190426 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

Quote from: jatajuta on February 17, 2014, 02:17:44 AM
So I wish I new how to show this, but I drew a line from the Dec 19 low on stamp to the Feb 9 low and it perfectly intersected the Feb 13 low, and it shows an upward slope.



This?



Thanks!



467. Post 5196513 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 14, 2014, 09:24:27 PM
If there is no new good news this weekend, we will possibly drift to a low that is loosely around 600 before heading back up.

Who need TA when ya got BJA?



468. Post 5196800 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 17, 2014, 02:22:27 AM
So I wish I new how to show this, but I drew a line from the Dec 19 low on stamp to the Feb 9 low and it perfectly intersected the Feb 13 low, and it shows an upward slope.



This?



Thanks!

somebody say something about a bottom?



469. Post 5197160 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 14, 2014, 09:24:27 PM
If there is no new good news this weekend, we will possibly drift to a low that is loosely around 600 before heading back up.

s I go to sleep, wake up, coffee, breakfast etc. Come here and people are saying the same things over and over and over.

so maybe I should just repeat myself ad nauseum also. Ok.

I called the weekend chart like I had a time machine.



470. Post 5197394 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: kurious on February 17, 2014, 12:52:49 PM
If there is no new good news this weekend, we will possibly drift to a low that is loosely around 600 before heading back up.

s I go to sleep, wake up, coffee, breakfast etc. Come here and people are saying the same things over and over and over.

so maybe I should just repeat myself ad nauseum also. Ok.

I called the weekend chart like I had a time machine.


So now your self-congratulatory messages are 'ironic'?!  Cool... Wink


When you knock one out of the park, it's customary to wave at the fans as you round the bases.  Grin



471. Post 5197780 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 17, 2014, 01:19:00 PM
Also, it makes sense to keep the hot wallet small to reduce the risk.

You already know that I am totally ignorant on how bitcoin works, and too old to learn; so forgive me for asking:

* How many weeks does it take for the network to process a transfer of a few thousand bitcoins from MtGOX's cold wallet to MtGOX's hot wallet? 

* How many such transfers from the same wallet can the network handle per month?

* If bitcoins were transferred into a wallet using certain custom software, can they be transferred out using a different software?

* If so, how much would MtGOX have to pay for a software that they could use to process the pending withdrawals, while they fix theirs?

You are too old to learn, apparently.



472. Post 5197877 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: dreamspark on February 17, 2014, 01:23:48 PM
Also, it makes sense to keep the hot wallet small to reduce the risk.

You already know that I am totally ignorant on how bitcoin works, and too old to learn; so forgive me for asking:

* How many weeks does it take for the network to process a transfer of a few thousand bitcoins from MtGOX's cold wallet to MtGOX's hot wallet? 

* How many such transfers from the same wallet can the network handle per month?

* If bitcoins were transferred into a wallet using certain custom software, can they be transferred out using a different software?

* If so, how much would MtGOX have to pay for a software that they could use to process the pending withdrawals, while they fix theirs?

Like others have said I respect your CV , I really do, but you need to get some btc and start using it, some of the questions you ask are in line with some of the silly stuff you see on reddit. Its like you havent even read the bitcoin FAQ.



I guess we should quit picking on Jorge.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1y4rx2/moronic_monday_ask_all_the_question_you_are/



473. Post 5208487 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 17, 2014, 10:59:24 PM
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/climate_desk/2014/02/internet_troll_personality_study_machiavellianism_narcissism_psychopathy.html

I do agree after reading some of the posts here. Not as bad as the Trollbox at BTC-e, but still... I think this is just a little bump on the road. Everyone should chill, and wait. Holding!!

It is an almost perfect characterization of the manic fud peddling behaviours associated with the ddos and malleability attacks:
Machiavellian, narcissistic, psychopathic, and sadistic.

I find it disturbing to think that criminals with these characteristics are becoming wealthy and powerful through bitcoin.  It makes me worried about the future of human life.


"The more beautiful and pure a thing is, the more satisfying it is to corrupt."

Forum trolls are implicitly admitting the beauty and purity of Bitcoin by trolling here.






474. Post 5209145 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: hamiltino on February 18, 2014, 12:04:40 AM
People are always talking about trolls and how they are doing it on purpose. But what you define as a troll is simply a person with a view against the majority (not always) which automatically puts him in the troll category. Isn't this another form of dictatorship where anyone with an opinion against the majority, no matter how wrong, right or emotionally driven his opinion is, gets completely dismissed without any logical arguments against his claims but just simply labled a troll like an automatic knee jerk reaction.  

We're not talking about bears. Read the article.



475. Post 5217351 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: Yololintian on February 18, 2014, 12:17:47 PM
What does everyone think is the cause for the massive continuous dump of btc on gox? I think it is just someone or a few ppl with tens of thousands of coins selling them for whatever reason, but I hear that some people think its manipulation and an entity is selling to itself to drive the price down. I see no way the latter case can actually be effective other than losing a major percentage of that entity's total goxbux/goxcoins. Sure, driving the price down will cause some panic selling (which in this scenario the manipulator tries to pick these panic-sold coins up), especially in the first stages of the detachment of gox prices to everywhere else, but when the price keeps going down and down on gox but not anywhere else, far less people are going to be selling their goxcoins in panic. The mega whale seller also cut down significant support all through 600s to 200s, and it will not be possible for it to buy back even 30% of those coins for the same price, judging by the orderbook ask depth. On the other hand, it seems as if most of the current supply of goxbux is dwindling under the great supply of btc the megawhale is dumping onto gox. To me this doesn't seem like manipulation but a huge increase in supply of btc if gox ever enables withdrawals, which through arbitrage will bring the prices much lower on other exchanges.
Also, does anyone have any other plausible justifications of the constant selling from the mega-whale?

Read the thread. This question has been asked no less that 50 times on this thread alone with hundreds of responses. and many many more times elsewhere.



476. Post 5217511 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

WTF just happened on stamp??? somebody snagged my cheap coins!



477. Post 5217659 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: cee-euros on February 18, 2014, 12:38:09 PM
WTF just happened on stamp??? somebody snagged my cheap coins!
Could have sold for 638 15 seconds later, never a dull moment.

nah. I'd get chewed up on fees trading swings that small. I'm waiting for sub $600 to reload. The problem is, if too many others are doing the same, I might not get the chance.



478. Post 5217890 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: Luno on February 18, 2014, 12:55:50 PM
But that still doesn't explain why the other exchanges are calm too. I think that their is a "gentlemen’s agreement" between exchanges not to take advantage on GOX

That is easier to explain: MtGOX is a roach motel -- what goes in presently cannot get out, and perhaps never will.  Except for naive investors who sell coins at other exchanges and sink their money into MtGOX, there is no communication between that market and all the others (which appear to be fairly well connected by arbitragers).

As others have pointed out, what the charts show for MtGox is trade of virtual "goxBTC" for virtual "goxUSD", that may be convertible one day to actual BTC and actual USD, at some unknown "exchange rate" between 1 and 0 (inclusive).

True, Gox is magical, I was not suggesting a conspiracy amongst exchanges, merely just a common incentive not to make everything worse for everybody.
I haven’t watched volume on multiple exchanges but there can't be much trade on the other floors if price action is so low?

The broader perspective might put us all in a roach motel, if banks choke bitcoin further. Too much mentioning of that in media the past 3 months Norway Canada Ukraine Denmark to mention a few.

Ideologically, it doesn't mean shit, Bitcoin is still beautiful, but this is a speculation thread, and it will have a severe impact on price .

Impossible. That would just drive the market to decentralized exchanges where we trade for cash. That would actually be better for Bitcoin in the long run, just like bittorrent is better for file sharing than Napster, although short term prices would take a big hit.



479. Post 5218062 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: Wekkel on February 18, 2014, 01:01:41 PM
Finally, my purchase decisions are not affected by a few percent of inflation. I buy if I need or want something. Inflation is mostly an annoyance to me (saving is impossible in our current system).


You are contradicting yourself there. Because saving up in cash has been made impossible, as you say, you save less and buy more. The point is that people should save wealth in production, not in money.

Perhaps it seems that way but wealth can be stored in other means than cash. It does not neccessarily increase my consumption. Whether people 'save' in production should be a free choice to make, not a forced one.


The capital structure of the entire economy is so out of whack after 30 years of artificially low interest rates, that investing in production at this point is folly in most cases. The true capitalist is flying blind at this point because the price signals are being intentionally distorted. Invest in production of what?

I invest in the production of cryptographic tokens that have the potential of restoring price signals and allowing capitalists to allocate resources where they are most needed.



480. Post 5218539 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: dreamspark on February 18, 2014, 01:39:34 PM
Call me a fool but I couldn't resist buying some goxBTC at .5. Be greedy when others are fearful and all that...

It's not foolish at all, provided you can live with the probable loss. It's like betting a number on the roulette wheel that pays off 50 to 1.



481. Post 5218910 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: dreamspark on February 18, 2014, 01:59:23 PM
Call me a fool but I couldn't resist buying some goxBTC at .5. Be greedy when others are fearful and all that...

It's not foolish at all, provided you can live with the probable loss. It's like betting a number on the roulette wheel that pays off 50 to 1.

Yeah I can definately take the loss. I only spent 10btc which is a smallish percentage of my 'play stash'.

The way I see it I would have to make a long series of really good trades to double up in the same way and there would be much much more risk involved. While Gox running off with the money is a distinct possibility I think the risk of this happening is far lower than 50-50.

The numbers just make sense really.

So we agree the risk/reward ratio is low enough. I think there is a greater than 50% chance you'll lose, but if you win, you'll more than double up. The problem is that this market moves so quickly that by the time you realize your profits, you may miss out on several other opportunities. Range trading to scoop up 2% per swing seems boring, but it's a guaranteed profit if you don't care if you're either fiat or BTC heavy when price moves to a new range.



482. Post 5219296 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: dreamspark on February 18, 2014, 02:30:08 PM
Call me a fool but I couldn't resist buying some goxBTC at .5. Be greedy when others are fearful and all that...

It's not foolish at all, provided you can live with the probable loss. It's like betting a number on the roulette wheel that pays off 50 to 1.

Yeah I can definately take the loss. I only spent 10btc which is a smallish percentage of my 'play stash'.

The way I see it I would have to make a long series of really good trades to double up in the same way and there would be much much more risk involved. While Gox running off with the money is a distinct possibility I think the risk of this happening is far lower than 50-50.

The numbers just make sense really.

So we agree the risk/reward ratio is low enough. I think there is a greater than 50% chance you'll lose, but if you win, you'll more than double up. The problem is that this market moves so quickly that by the time you realize your profits, you may miss out on several other opportunities. Range trading to scoop up 2% per swing seems boring, but it's a guaranteed profit if you don't care if you're either fiat or BTC heavy when price moves to a new range.

Yeah I see where your coming from. Range trading can bite you as well though if the market suddenly takes off and your left on the wrong side of a short- what would your range have been over the last week for instance? And what do you do when your trading for 2% profits and the market moves 10% the other way eating the last 5 trades you made? I dont see myself as missing other oppurtunities as I have enough fiat/btc to make any moves I may want to make in the mean time. As you can can probably tell I trade for btc profits rather than fiat. I personally put it about 30% Ill lose but only time will tell  Cheesy

The current range:
I publicly called the Feb 9 $530 as the bottom. I sold a tiny bit on the bounce, bought it back at $550.
I sold at $678, so I missed a little bit of the bounce and now I'm waiting for lows again under $600. I don't really care if it goes higher, though. I have BTC set aside for trading higher ranges. Only going lower than $550 will necessitate me depositing fresh fiat.



483. Post 5219855 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

http://www.coindesk.com/localbitcoins-manufacturing-low-cost-bitcoin-atm/

http://www.coindesk.com/first-us-bitcoin-atm-seattle-austin/

These machines will be more profitable than video poker during the next major rally.



484. Post 5220196 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Now we're seeing some action!  



485. Post 5220347 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 18, 2014, 03:33:41 PM

Do you know what fees they will charge?


Localbitcoins charges a 1% fee on their site. I don't know if there will be an additional fee for ATMs except for what the owner/operator adds, which could be anything. Traders typically charge ~10% so ATM operators may do likewise unless they face local competition.

During rallies when prices are rocketing, this is a reasonable markup.  Waiting a week to buy when prices are going up can be an eternity.



486. Post 5220422 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: surfer43 on February 18, 2014, 03:42:14 PM
Now we're seeing some action!  
Care to elaborate?  Tongue

>1k dump on Stamp.



487. Post 5220636 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: the_poet on February 18, 2014, 03:54:59 PM
About to go under $600 on Stamp (currently @ $610).

Possibly. There's respectable resistance. A few more failed attempts and it'll go back up instead.



488. Post 5220834 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 18, 2014, 03:59:13 PM
Still massive dumps of Goxcoins, seems like people think they are worthless after all

as the poll indicates, clearly poeple have very little confidence they will resume withdrawals as promised.

are poeple trading gox on superior information or emotion... that is the question.

I pulled my funds out at a ~15% loss precisely so I wouldn't have so much riding on the answer, but if I did have funds there now, I'd buy when the discount reaches 60% over Stamp. I think there's a >40% chance GoxBTC is recoverable. GoxBux, OTOH, I put at ~20%. Poor bastards. It's like people fighting over flotsam off the Titanic with all the lifeboats full. Still, it may be a big opportunity for someone willing to take a big risk.



489. Post 5220849 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 18, 2014, 04:04:54 PM
About to go under $600 on Stamp (currently @ $610).

Possibly. There's respectable resistance. A few more failed attempts and it'll go back up instead.

sorry, up where?

My bad. "support".



490. Post 5220909 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 18, 2014, 04:04:54 PM
About to go under $600 on Stamp (currently @ $610).

Possibly. There's respectable resistance. A few more failed attempts and it'll go back up instead.

sorry, up where?

(if...) It'll go back up to test $650.



491. Post 5220977 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: surfer43 on February 18, 2014, 04:13:13 PM
Still massive dumps of Goxcoins, seems like people think they are worthless after all

as the poll indicates, clearly poeple have very little confidence they will resume withdrawals as promised.

are poeple trading gox on superior information or emotion... that is the question.

I pulled my funds out at a ~15% loss precisely so I wouldn't have so much riding on the answer, but if I did have funds there now, I'd buy when the discount reaches 60% over Stamp. I think there's a >40% chance goxBTC is recoverable. GoxBux, OTOH, I put at ~20%. Poor bastards. It's like people fighting over flotsam off the Titanic with all the lifeboats full. Still, it may be a big opportunity for someone willing to take a big risk.
The market disagrees with you  Smiley If it agreed, then GoxBTC would be trading at $1200.
I put the chances for both at 99% as the Mt. Gox people will be locked up if they don't deliver.

Well yeah, and those people still have money riding on the outcome and I don't (anymore), so you should rationally put more stock in what the market is saying. I also have no insider information. I'm not selling a position. I'm just thinking out loud.



492. Post 5221138 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: magicmexican on February 18, 2014, 04:26:16 PM
What i mean is that price going from the ~300 to 412 after the update, and then down to 250 without any new info, just somewhat illogical.

I would be thinking that if there are people who think that their coins are gone - they should've sold their coins days ago, not now

I agree with you, but you know the old saying: markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.



493. Post 5222693 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: Arcas on February 18, 2014, 05:38:40 PM
I don't understand why Bitcoin ATMs are such a big deal. It's almost like a kiosk for paying a credit card bill or something. Why would I pay a ridiculous premium for something I can do for so much cheaper at my own home?

Because it takes FOUR days minimum to buy from home if you are not already set up to do so. If price is changing rapidly, that can cost you far more than a 10-20% fee.



494. Post 5223406 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Just when you thought MK couldn't possibly be more obtuse:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1y8ot2/we_are_very_surprised_anyone_could_blame_mtgox/

This is Asperger syndrome level incompetence. Without believing, I fully understand the tinfoil hat crew's assumption that he's driving the price down on purpose.  Hell, even the Silk Road 2 guy said "I failed you". It's a sad sad day when you have to look to criminals for lessons on leadership. The buck stops at the top. It happened on your watch, Mark. Own it.




495. Post 5224004 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 18, 2014, 07:06:37 PM
hyperdeflation is the inevitable outcome of bitcoin.

why?  the money supply in btc is stable. 


It's only possible to have hyperdeflation when the amount of DEBT denominated in BTC is high. The fractional reserve money multiplier runs in reverse as the loans are either paid back or written off. The only entity that owes a substantial amount of bitcoin right now is Gox...hey...hmmm




496. Post 5224237 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on February 18, 2014, 07:27:14 PM

Even the banks Gox uses in Japan are under international pressure because of possible criminal activity in Bitcoin (I read about car loans to drug dealers almost collapsing Gox's bank a while ago, while HSBC's laundry of over $600 billion gets a slap on the risk.[/]

Freudian typo?



497. Post 5224622 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

annnnd the market didn't even notice.



498. Post 5225986 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 18, 2014, 10:15:42 PM
Yes any particular reason for the dip to 248 on Gox?  Or just Gox being Gox.  It shook BSP a bit which is stupid.  BSP traders should know better.

Price shoots up when the forum comes back online. hmmmm. Perhaps someone was trying to scoop some cheap goxcoin by creating some uncertainty with a ddos attack here, but gave up when the price flatlined instead of dropping.



499. Post 5227364 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 18, 2014, 10:54:42 PM
...even the Silk Road 2 guy said "I failed you". It's a sad sad day when you have to look to criminals for lessons on leadership...

Isn't this the classic next move after a Bitcoin scam? Apologize, maybe pay some people back "out of your own coins," wait 6 months and start a new scam with integrity intact. I thought the SR2 guy blamed the loss of entire funds on malleability which we know is impossible. Did that change or did I get it wrong?

The malleability exploit amounts to a photocopied receipt. Harmless by itself, but could have led to double spending through a social hack. This may have cost Gox some coins also. I suspect Gox is halting BTC withdrawals until they find out who did it. They likely have the ability to resume withdrawals now, but don't want to because they haven't frozen the fraudsters accounts yet. If this is the case, it might get messy as they back out all the trades from those accounts.

As for SR2 being a scam, who knows? Doesn't matter if they stole coins entrusted to them or lost them. The coins are gone and the trust should be also. Caveat Emptor.



500. Post 5227815 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: Mota on February 19, 2014, 12:19:25 AM
How boring is it on stamp  Undecided

Give us some cheap coins man...

there 580 15K cheap coins right infront of you dude


I know the price is good but what if we really go down to 400 when gox withdraws work again? Then I will bite my ass that I bought at 630...

Why should we go down? Why do people always think that the people who bought cheap on gox will dump them immediately? most of them will wait until it's at 1000 again before they dump. I know i will.

It's likely that there will be a small dip due to some people needing fiat for cashflow reasons, followed by a rise due to some restored confidence.



501. Post 5239249 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Bitcoin is the world's first Distributed Autonomous Corporation. We who hold bitcoins are shareholders. When we buy bitcoin, the money goes either directly or indirectly to the miners (the employees) who secure the network.  This is in no way a Ponzi or pyramid scheme. It's an extremely efficient corporation where we don't have to pay management anything because management is simply code. Open source code- Ultimate transparency.

The mission of the corporation is to provide a conduit of exchange and to maintain a ledger of all transactions on that conduit.

Jorge doesn't just misunderstand Bitcoin. He misunderstands money.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjective_theory_of_value








502. Post 5239540 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: Ivanhoe on February 19, 2014, 04:10:48 PM
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/61200 Interesting read if you have time.

Banking doesn't need a conspiracy. Banking is an open conspiracy, hidden only by complexity. It is ultimately held together only by the threat of force levied at the tax livestock (citizens) of the world governments. It's backed by the point of a gun. Repeal legal tender laws and it would collapse overnight.




503. Post 5242382 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Apparently Jorge doesn't believe anyone should be compensated for taking risks that pan out.  To him, it's all just "gambling", a vice that should not be rewarded.   As an entrepreneur, if I gamble that my customers will want my products or services as a price that I can profitably afford to provide them, then I am gambling. A day trader gambles that the market will want liquidity at a time that he can profitably provide it. A programmer gambles that the time he invests in writing code will be well utilized by people who may chose to run that code.

Nobody is forced to do business with anyone in the free market. We invest our time, effort and wealth in the hopes that what we have to offer will be valued at a price we can profitably afford to provide it. If we serve the market well, we are rewarded, and if we serve the market poorly, we lose money. This is important. We don't just work for free, we lose money providing goods and services people want.  We accept this risk because we know that the market (which includes us) is better off when trade is voluntary.

Employees get paid for their time and effort even if the employer loses money. Who's the more noble? Honest labor is a good pursuit, but without risk-taking entrepreneurs, laborers would all be slaves.



504. Post 5242656 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 19, 2014, 06:48:45 PM
the butthurt of late adopters is sweet, sweet nectar

except they aren't even late adopters yet! they could STILL be early adopters, but they are too greedy. They want in at earlier prices without taking the risk that earlier adopters took. If I had thought that way, I wouldn't have bought in during the 2011 rally.

I have nothing but respect for the people who bought in before me. Envy is ugly and serves no productive purpose.





505. Post 5243121 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: kkaspar on February 19, 2014, 07:07:16 PM
When we buy bitcoin, the money goes either directly or indirectly to the miners (the employees) who secure the network.  

"The securing of network" part went away after coming of pools. With pools, the general network hash rate doesn't mean anything in terms of security of bitcoin. Only thing that matters now is the number of pools and the security of pools.
Bitcoin security was created in a way that network isn't concentrated anywhere, and everyone can do their fair part in handling the network. You can tell that bitcoin was never designed to be this big, because it's distribution system only could handle solo mining to a certain level. That was the level to what bitcoin was designed to evolve.
Pools were abominations of the entire system, because the system intended for no centralization whatsoever. The proper crypto for this level of active users should not need any pools and everyone will get paid directly from the network. Only then, the increasing user base will also increase the security of the network. Otherwise it's just a bad joke..
The other problem came with the coming of ASICs, when another wave of useless wasting began. Bitcoin network used to be supported by hardware, that had other use for it. Now people are building hardware that's only purpose is to mine bitcoins. But the increasing hash rate doesn't improve security, or anything for that matter, so the building of ASICs is also actually doing empty work that doesn't actually improve anything. It's all just for trying to crab a bite of this cake of hype.

The future is in new cryptos, because bitcoin code is becoming more and more obsolete...

Pools don't make Bitcoin obsolete anymore than political parties make democracy obsolete. (democracy is obsolete, BTW, but not because of parties) Bitcoin works good enough, and substantially better than the alternatives. Newer cryptos may indeed have better code, and if and when they have ENOUGH better code to overcome Bitcoin's first mover advantage,then I'll switch. Proof of work is the most fair way to increase liquidity while maintaining scarcity. Sure, asics require capital. That's why it's called "capitalism". Real scarcity requires the imposition of real costs. artificial scarcity would give the maintainer of that scarcity too much power (yes you, central banks). altcryptos that utilize CPU mining could just "waste" those cpu cycles or else set off another mining arms race just as bad as the one we have now.



506. Post 5243538 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: keithers on February 19, 2014, 07:50:33 PM
you'd think there would be SOME rise in price on gox in anticipation of the btc withdrawals coming back online soon.

seems everyone has lost all hope for gox

It seems like the worry has shifted to Gox ultimately filing bankruptcy.   In that event, investors would be likely to sell all the can to get back into fiat, so that they may have a reasonable claim in court.  Since governments, and therefore the courts have not laid out specific guidelines on whether or not bitcoin is a currency, the likelihood of being able to recoup fiat from a bankruptcy is greater than the likelihood of being able to recoup btc.



So who's buying up all those $261 goxcoins?



507. Post 5243587 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

If a VC wanted to buy MK out, buying a shitload of Goxcoins on the cheap would give that person a lot of leverage in the event Gox is insolvent.



508. Post 5245023 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on February 19, 2014, 09:19:36 PM

who is joe?

do you mean jorge? (hint read slowly with eyes open)

JorgeStolfi ... some self-styled 'academic' who showed up here recently pontificating (wrongly) about bitcoin.

ok thanks,

Quote
Jorge Stolfi is a full professor of computer science at the State University of Campinas, working in computer vision, image processing, splines and other function approximation methods, graph theory, computational geometry, and several other fields.

He's a computer scientist who's made a statement about the economic aspect of Bitcoin, congrats you "debunked" a out of profession statement of somebody!
Come back if he writes something about the protocol or software.

Bitcoin seems intuitively faulty to people who do not understand Austrian economics the same way heliocentric theory seemed intuitively bad to non-astronomers a few hundred years ago. The truth is only obvious once the paradigm shift has been made.



509. Post 5245103 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

How the hell does Gox have a floor like that with no bid wall??  



510. Post 5245249 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

SOMETHING there is that doesn't love a wall,   
That sends the frozen-ground-swell under it,   
And spills the upper boulders in the sun;   
And makes gaps even two can pass abreast.



511. Post 5246331 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on February 19, 2014, 10:31:10 PM
Stamp taking a dive...

3k coins... Wonder if any of them are goxcoins that somehow escaped the goxprison

doubt it. people will be frontrunning the arb before the first confirmation out of Gox.



512. Post 5248082 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

"We will update everyone again by Thursday at the latest"~mt. Gox Team

Way to exceed expectations, Guys.



513. Post 5248524 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: ChrisML on February 20, 2014, 12:37:44 AM
"We will update everyone again by Thursday at the latest"~mt. Gox Team

Way to exceed expectations, Guys.

You do know that it's 9:30 AM in Japan right now, right?

Monday they announced at 9:30 PM in Japan. That was 1:00 PM in Europe.

Have some patience. Ffs.

Ffs? Ffs?

When was the last time someone was pleasantly surprised by something from Mt. Gox?  I'm not meaning "Well, you still can't get your money out, but we'll give a discount on trading fees" or "you can't get your money out, but we'll sell you litecoin".

You sit your fat asses on a baby blue bouncy balls cuz you wanna look like a start-up. Fine. START-UPS ARE HUNGRY. Act hungry. Exceed expectations and earn business.



514. Post 5249046 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 20, 2014, 01:08:27 AM
here is a little blast from the past for anyone who wants us to have more "patience"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=172991.0

That's stunning. monkey-fucking asshats. Had a billion dollar baby and didn't bother to change the diapers.



515. Post 5252297 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 20, 2014, 06:58:53 AM
Gox 214. 

201

Goxcoin =~1/3 BTC



516. Post 5252453 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

GOOOOOOOOOooooooooox!!

194. it's like watching a train wreck. Can't. stop. watching.



517. Post 5252594 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: electronistul on February 20, 2014, 07:27:53 AM
There was a $530 low on Stamp earlier in February ... will we hit that ? Or maybe go past that ?

I'm setting limit orders near $550. fairly heavy resistance in that range.



518. Post 5252667 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: windjc on February 20, 2014, 07:31:32 AM
Panic in full force now.  Cool

there's so much blood! 1 goxcoin =~1/4 BTC



519. Post 5256765 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: magicmexican on February 20, 2014, 11:52:09 AM
On the other note, todays dump from 250 to 130 (hours before the update) was such fucking obvious inside trading its not even funny.

looks really suspicious.

The announcement mentions "security issues". After mishandling millions of dollars of customers money, I wouldn't be surprised if they got a few threats.



520. Post 5258518 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Why would anyone buy goxcoin on bitcoinbuilder when they can just wire money to Gox and buy at a much lower price? I mean if you want to buy lottery tickets, at least don't over pay for them.



521. Post 5259049 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: TERA on February 20, 2014, 01:45:57 PM
Why would anyone buy goxcoin on bitcoinbuilder when they can just wire money to Gox and buy at a much lower price? I mean if you want to buy lottery tickets, at least don't over pay for them.
Because it takes 10 days for their international bank wire.

10 days? Crap like this is why we need bitcoin in the first place.



522. Post 5259275 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on February 20, 2014, 02:12:01 PM
Why would anyone buy goxcoin on bitcoinbuilder when they can just wire money to Gox and buy at a much lower price? I mean if you want to buy lottery tickets, at least don't over pay for them.
Because it takes 10 days for their international bank wire.

10 days? Crap like this is why we need bitcoin in the first place.

24-48h with SEPA.

Bitcoin is not faster. First you have to buy them and the other part hast to exchange them back to local currency.
Problem is: In most countries converting btc to fiat is not that easy.

IMO its obvious Billy was hinting at the fact once we finally switch to btc in everyday purchasing there will be no swapping it for dirty fiat paper. Also eliminating waiting 10 days to transfer wealth


correct.



523. Post 5263697 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

goxcoin=~1/5 BTC  



524. Post 5263752 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on February 20, 2014, 05:22:23 PM
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1ygcil/as_requested_im_ben_lawsky_superintendent_of_the/?sort=new

"Here comes the blind commissioner. They've got him in a trance. One hand is tied to the tight-rope walker. The other is in his pants." ~Bob Dylan




525. Post 5269905 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: kurious on February 20, 2014, 10:40:36 PM
With this whole fiasco all I want to know is why billyjoeallen isn't still shouting he called the bubble bottom correctly?

He he!

I think it was called rather loudly on many occasions.  Not always wise to call a price as the bottom / top.

Some might say foolhardier still to boast you called it right.

48 hours is a long time in Bitcoin

So far, I'm still right. Stamp would have to drop below $530 for that to change.



526. Post 5270005 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 20, 2014, 11:02:46 PM
With this whole fiasco all I want to know is why billyjoeallen isn't still shouting he called the bubble bottom correctly?

He he!

I think it was called rather loudly on many occasions.  Not always wise to call a price as the bottom / top.

Some might say foolhardier still to boast you called it right.

48 hours is a long time in Bitcoin

So far, I'm still right. Stamp would have to drop below $530 for that to change.

Ahhh... you were conveniently excluding Gox I see.

As is coindesk and the winkdex.



527. Post 5270183 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on February 20, 2014, 11:07:54 PM
Has anyone try to buy BTC from coinbase and waited the 4 days?

Yes. With a verified account, you can get limited amount instantly, but four days is actually a relatively short time to wait compared to other sources. unfortunately. Four days is typical, but it may take five buisiness days. You'll get your BTC. They are reliable.



528. Post 5270441 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: kurious on February 20, 2014, 11:14:52 PM
With this whole fiasco all I want to know is why billyjoeallen isn't still shouting he called the bubble bottom correctly?

He he!

I think it was called rather loudly on many occasions.  Not always wise to call a price as the bottom / top.

Some might say foolhardier still to boast you called it right.

48 hours is a long time in Bitcoin

So far, I'm still right. Stamp would have to drop below $530 for that to change.

Ahhh... you were conveniently excluding Gox I see.

As is coindesk and the winkdex.

Maybe he was remembering your posts like this..?

If there is no new good news this weekend, we will possibly drift to a low that is loosely around 600 before heading back up.

Yeah, that was me.

What, no props? I nailed it again!!

We did head back up. You didn't sell at $650? I didn't say we would STAY up.  Seriously, I put a few qualifiers in there and you know this is just my estimation and not some inside info. Considering the Xaction malleability issue and all the other FUD, I'm surprised my prediction has held up as well as it has. If you don't like my analysis, you can get a full money-back refund for what you paid for it.



529. Post 5270914 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 20, 2014, 11:50:57 PM
Just had limit order trigger on Stamp.  Looks like today I am buying.

Fixin to get some moar myself. Juuust a li'l bit lower.



530. Post 5271887 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

bombs away! just pulled the trigger. $550 at CoinBase. Have a feeling I'll catch a few more falling knives before this is over.



531. Post 5272932 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

LOL so far I am 1 penny away from being wrong about the $530 bottom!



532. Post 5273781 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Goxcoins gonna rocket. It's just a matter of time. Window of opportunity is finite. In this game, you have to put your self in a position to get lucky.



533. Post 5273917 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: Chalkbot on February 21, 2014, 03:25:40 AM
Do whales get nervous -- in either the literal or idiomatic sense?

I'd have thought due to his size (physical or financial) he would simply shrug and swim on.

Bitcoin is down around $150 in one week. If you had 10000 BTC (by no means a proper whale amount), that is $150K less value you have. Considering some of these guys had next to nothing before they invested/mined in Bitcoin, I would suggest that such shrinkage in nominal value leaves many large scale holders of Bitcoin with quite an uneasy feeling in their guts. Perhaps they would have to work 5 years in their day jobs to earn this sort of money. Now, it looks like Bitcoin is going to go another $150 lower sooner or later.....so if you had 10K BTC, and were considering that possibility, what might you want to do with at least some of your stash, assuming Bitcoin wasn't just an amusing gamble on the side to take your mind of your hedge funds and vaults full of gold bullion?


Check your math. Tongue


LOL. What MtC can't seem to understand is that long term hodlers have been hardened by many many such times as these. If we were the sort that bailed when we got uneasy feelings in our guts, we wouldn't have all our coins in the first place. Now we just see opportunity to get MOAR.



534. Post 5274091 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: luis77 on February 21, 2014, 03:39:29 AM
Where do you think are we going next hours? do you think we are going to break 530 (bitstamp) next time we hit?

My opinion is that 530 is going to hold, but it will get tested several times. After that, there will be nowhere to go but up.



535. Post 5274178 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: Vigil on February 21, 2014, 03:45:44 AM
Where do you think are we going next hours? do you think we are going to break 530 (bitstamp) next time we hit?

My opinion is that 530 is going to hold, but it will get tested several times. After that, there will be nowhere to go but up.
You also thought that "$900 were the cheap coins". :0

In my defense they were $800 coins and I still think they're cheap.  I thought $31 coins were cheap too for about a year and a half before I was proven right. in Bitcoin, you're never wrong, just early  Wink




536. Post 5280264 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: Yololintian on February 21, 2014, 10:37:18 AM

Ain't looking good at all, the failed transaction started early NOVEMBER, i had got 2 withdrawals stuck back then.
So that's 3 months of exploiting the Gox Automatic Giving Machine.

This means that there are less coins available than we thought, price should go up.
To the contrary, it means hundreds of thousands of coins have been stolen, which may be sold at any time on other exchanges and greatly increasing the supply and thus decreasing the price.

This started months ago. Most of the coins would have already been sold.



537. Post 5280649 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 21, 2014, 03:21:09 AM
Goxcoins gonna rocket. It's just a matter of time. Window of opportunity is finite. In this game, you have to put your self in a position to get lucky.

>60% in less than 12 hours! Sometimes it hurts to be this good.

Nailed it. again.

*sold what I bought yesterday in the $570s just to have more dry powder to defend $530 if necessary. Still massively long.*



538. Post 5280982 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: Richard Branson on February 21, 2014, 01:12:15 PM
Goxcoins gonna rocket. It's just a matter of time. Window of opportunity is finite. In this game, you have to put your self in a position to get lucky.

>60% in less than 12 hours! Sometimes it hurts to be this good.

Nailed it. again.

*sold what I bought yesterday in the $570s just to have more dry powder to defend $530 if necessary. Still massively long.*

Real pro...
Selling @ 1100 is much better  Wink

Got cheaper coins than you. And I've picked up a few sub 100$ GOX-BTC. Allways have dirty fiat in every "major" exchange.

So far all you have are goxIOUs unless you sold on bitcoinbuilder. What makes you think I didn't sell @ $1100? I sold some. bought 'em back on the way down. Now if MK can just get this little issue of withdrawals taken care of, we can both make money and i can congratulate you on your trades.



539. Post 5281400 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on February 21, 2014, 01:38:23 PM
I know nothing about TA but is that a "head and shoulders" forming on 15m chart on stamp? That is supposed to be bullish I believe?

http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:chart_analysis:chart_patterns:head_and_shoulders_b



540. Post 5282304 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: magicmexican on February 21, 2014, 02:32:43 PM
bears dumping from the shadows again

Everyone's just trying to get back in lower. Friday being payday for many, I doubt there will be an opportunity as great as yesterday's.



541. Post 5282486 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 21, 2014, 02:48:39 PM
bears dumping from the shadows again

Everyone's just trying to get back in lower. Friday being payday for many, I doubt there will be an opportunity as great as yesterday's.


you call yesterday's 530 $ an opportunity?

all I saw yesterday was weak support, no buying frenzy, and no volume.

400s here we come!

can I quote you on that?



542. Post 5282512 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: seleme on February 21, 2014, 02:53:48 PM
we're going below 500.

We're going below your mom.



543. Post 5282579 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on February 21, 2014, 02:57:16 PM
we're going below 500.

We're going below your mom.

Is that so much HATE? It looks like  ShroomsKit shadow has corrupted your soul!!!  Undecided

Not at all. I love going below his mom.



544. Post 5284308 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: seleme on February 21, 2014, 03:51:27 PM
we're going below 500.

We're going below your mom.

Stay class Billyboy, stay classy...

In real world you would need to prove that point with your fists and strength of your teeth but this is Internet so staying classy is best way to not look like an idiot. I guess not looking like idiot is hard in your case but people have done bigger things while trying hard Wink

You mom doesn't like it when I use fists and teeth. Four fingers at the most.




545. Post 5284663 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: magicmexican on February 21, 2014, 04:29:55 PM
The day of false hopes, looks like we will end up below 100 again

Have some faith, Bro. At some point the panicmonkeys will get so burned that they won't panic anymore even if it's called for.



546. Post 5284812 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: seleme on February 21, 2014, 04:57:22 PM
we're going below 500.

We're going below your mom.

Stay class Billyboy, stay classy...

In real world you would need to prove that point with your fists and strength of your teeth but this is Internet so staying classy is best way to not look like an idiot. I guess not looking like idiot is hard in your case but people have done bigger things while trying hard Wink

You mom doesn't like it when I use fists and teeth. Four fingers at the most.



Seriously, what is wrong with someone saying "we're going below 500" ?  I think we will go below 400 a flash crash maybe ? who knows, take your feelings out of this, I do hold allot of wealth in Bitcoin, but this cant stop Bitcoin from going down, also trashing other members wont stop it..... you will look silly if it happens.... I've been there Wink

You know what's wrong - he is shitting his pants while trying to look brave. Little bitch  Grin

But that's good, more anxiety and aggression, means we're closer to bottom and I'll get rid of my fiat sooner Cheesy

I have a little anxiety that I may not get another crack at $530 coins... and about your mom's open door policy, but I'll deal. There's plenty for everybody in both cases.



547. Post 5284931 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: kkaspar on February 21, 2014, 04:53:16 PM

Dude called the lowest price point of 5 days, and now he is all confident and brave in expressing his perverted nature. That's messed up..

Eleven days. It's easy to count that high if you take off your shoes and use your toes.



548. Post 5285067 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: empowering on February 21, 2014, 05:07:53 PM
@BillieJean

Don´t you ever feel ashamed. It´s people like you who are responsible that i can´t ever turn real bull again.


haaa haaa haaa haaa   ahhh stop it  please .... stop... oh my oh my that is a good one Fonzie coming from you...
haaaa haaa haaa oh you just made my day





Oh and good to see you work out if you should be a bull or a bear again..  via the opinion of someone on a forum ...
good work

Fonzie's still around? Hey Fonz, yer ignored Buddy. For weeks now. I can't hear you. Maybe it was a rhetorical question.

Ok, seriously- everybody stop talking about S's mom. She's just a generous open-minded person and that's not a bad thing. Don't get distracted from what we're doing here.



549. Post 5292930 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: Richy_T on February 22, 2014, 02:56:55 AM

And if I your kneecaps were replaced by fish, you'd have a hard time standing up as well.  It doesn't matter, however, because you stand on kneecaps.  There are infintely many Dogecoin.  If anything that only increases the value of Bitcoin, as you have to acquire Bitcoin in order to buy Dogecoin.  The absurdity of your argument is manifest by its own conclusion:  Since there are infinitely many cryptocoins, and this does not in fact render Bitcoin worthless, the argument that the existence of infinitely many cryptocoins renders Bitcoin worthless is a fallacious argument, of no more relevance than the imaginary fish which seek to render you paralegic.


Indeed. How about if one replaces "US dollar" with "dollar"



So these critics say Bitcoin will fail because there aren't enough of them (21 mil at the most) and also that Bitcoin will fail because there are an infinite supply if you count the alts. They said Bitcoin will fail because the price was too high and now they say it will fail because the price is down.

Whales have too much market clout and also they aren't using their market clout in sufficiently beneficial ways. They are not stabilizing the price enough and also they are making the price too stable to allow many small traders to profit from instability.

Bitcoin is being coopted by banksters who are also ignoring us. Centralized exchanges are too powerful but also don't have enough market depth and volume.

The Bitcoin adoption rate is too fast and too slow. It goes on and on.



550. Post 5293106 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: Arcas on February 22, 2014, 03:11:36 AM
My opinion isn't popular here, but fiat currencies are backed by national governments. Isn't that worth more than lumps of conductive metals?

Fait currencies are backed by guns. Our currency is backed by math. Which is more reliable?



551. Post 5293192 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 22, 2014, 03:33:59 AM

I suppose I do not know what libertarianism is exactly.   I have read two short bios of Ayn Rand, which included a summary of her ideas, and a lot of statements by people who declare themselves "libertarians".  Some of the latter sounded like they hated any form of government.  For example, some people on this forum were against suing MtGOX, and I understood that it was because that would be an "un-libertarian" thing.  I have seen many oppose any form of regulation of exchanges and such, apparently for that reason. 

The way you think is so arrogant. Market regulation is regulation. Government regulation is just central planning. You think because we oppose central governments that we oppose governance, as if society needs no rules. True rule of law, REAL rule of law can only come from decentralized governance. Otherwise, we effectively have rule of man who arbitrarily interprets and enforces those laws.

Central planners do not have the information or processing power to make efficient regulations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem This is true for trade policy, monetary policy and pretty much everything else.  And that assumes the government agents have good intentions, which is giving them too much credit in many cases.



552. Post 5293269 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: Arcas on February 22, 2014, 03:40:26 AM
My opinion isn't popular here, but fiat currencies are backed by national governments. Isn't that worth more than lumps of conductive metals?

Fait currencies are backed by guns. Our currency is backed by math. Which is more reliable?
Guns are pretty convincing when you are the one staring down the barrel.

And Bitcoin isn't backed by math, it's backed by faith. Numbers have no inherent value. There is no mathematical reason for Bitcoin to be valuable besides the trust we place in it.

Every Shitcoin in the alt board is backed by math as well. It doesn't make them valuable.

The fucker holding the gun has to sleep sometime. When does math sleep?
It's public knowledge that I'm no fan of altcoins, but the existence of the alt board proves you wrong if you claim they are completely worthless.



553. Post 5293336 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: Peter R on February 22, 2014, 03:51:13 AM

However, if I say "OK, Joe, you don't have any bitcoins?  I'll give you an ice cream today if you promise to pay me back next week."  If Joe doesn't pay me, I could sue him in small claims court, and, if I won, he would be ordered to pay me back and he would have the right to do so in dollars.  

Opportunity costs are real and can form the basis for contract enforcement. Break a promise and your credibility ranking goes down. No guns necessary. Quit looking to mommy Government to bail you out every time you place trust is some untrustworthy person.



554. Post 5298131 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

What if this final capitulation that so many are waiting for just doesn't happen? It's no secret that the capitulators after every other crash lost out. People can read graphs. How long are the vultures gonna wait for these elusive cheap coins?



555. Post 5299009 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

49 cents down. Damn Tera, those sheep are gettin' slaughtered.



556. Post 5299139 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 22, 2014, 01:13:15 PM
More bad news:

http://www.coindesk.com/documents-goldman-sachs-discussing-bitcoin/

"New York-based global investment banking giant Goldman Sachs has completed an initial assessment of digital currencies that concluded they are currently too volatile for serious investors."

Au contraire dear fonz ... GS are notorious for recommending/downgrading assets against the best interests of their clients, for the very purposes of front-running them. Typically on the juiciest of plays.

The very fact GS are covering bitcoin in a report is the news. Their statement that it is "too volatile for serious investors" ... means stay away until we establish our positions first. Volatility is life blood for these guys.

+1

had to smile when i read that THEY say it is too volatile for investing for SERIOUS investors. Guess these guys are buying, especially with regarding to the TIMING of their assessment

Surely not the Goldman Sachs that brought us the Abacus CDO which was one of the doggiest of the dogs? 

http://sevenpillarsinstitute.org/case-studies/goldman-sachs-and-the-abacus-deal

An argument can be made that high volatility investments demand a MORE serious investor class. You have to pick your entry and exit points much more carefully.



557. Post 5299335 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: TERA on February 22, 2014, 01:33:00 PM
49 cents down. Damn Tera, those sheep are gettin' slaughtered.
The trap has not finished yet. There is room on the chart for a false breakout to 600 (with maybe a flashspike to 620). The slaughter happens after this breakout fails only for people to find that not only are prices declining below 580 but that they are now trapped inside a giant triangle breakdown of 530 into the 400s.

I bet you're a real hoot at parties. Peeing in the pool and then starting a rumor that cops are coming any minute.



558. Post 5299571 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: soullyG on February 22, 2014, 01:38:52 PM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ymb4r/some_light_on_the_horizon_for_gox/






559. Post 5299747 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: TERA on February 22, 2014, 02:07:35 PM
49 cents down. Damn Tera, those sheep are gettin' slaughtered.
The trap has not finished yet. There is room on the chart for a false breakout to 600 (with maybe a flashspike to 620). The slaughter happens after this breakout fails only for people to find that not only are prices declining below 580 but that they are now trapped inside a giant triangle breakdown of 530 into the 400s.

It's so funny to read posts of bears who are frustrated their $400 bid didn't fill. And slightly silly.
Is it not possible to have an academic and scientific discussion on price trends here without constant harassment and suspicion into my whatever my personal position and agenda are? Honestly I don't care anymore whether I get filled in the 400s. Maybe I will end up having to buy in 500s (or maybe it'll end up being 300s). I would be happy to see bitcoin prices bottom out at whatever that price may be so that I can start using bitcoin as a store of value again rather than holding bitstampUSD, bitfinexUSD, btceUSD, disney dollars, etc. However, I'm not going to pretend like THIS is a good chart to buy into right now.



Looks oversold to me.



560. Post 5299834 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: oda.krell on February 22, 2014, 02:19:08 PM
"wait and see if price goes down a bit more" worked out pretty well so far, that much you must admit, no?

Tell that to the people who are waiting to see $40 coins since last April.



561. Post 5299961 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: oda.krell on February 22, 2014, 02:27:02 PM
"wait and see if price goes down a bit more" worked out pretty well so far, that much you must admit, no?

Tell that to the people who are waiting to see $40 coins since last April.

Who said anything about 40$ coins, or, now I guess 400$. I actually said I have no idea if we're going down that much.

Point is, you'd have to be a complete moron to set a fixed price target in this market and never adjust it (like some linear regression wankers like to do), but there's another option: if you want to play it slightly safer than the average buy&holder, start buying back when you have some confirmation that the trend turned around. Maybe someone with a better read of the market can see those signs already, but to me it looks like we're still on extremely shaky grounds.

You're guaranteed to miss the bottom if you wait for clear signs of a trend reversal.



562. Post 5300015 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 22, 2014, 02:30:35 PM
everybody speculating whether this is the bottom is a clear sign to me that we are far from it.

So your operating theory is that I'm stupid and whatever I say is wrong. Interesting. Are you my ex-wife?



563. Post 5300459 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 22, 2014, 02:42:01 PM
everybody speculating whether this is the bottom is a clear sign to me that we are far from it.

So your operating theory is that I'm stupid and whatever I say is wrong. Interesting. Are you my ex-wife?

I dont care what are you saying. who the fuck are you? and who the fuck cares about your life, wife, cat, etc?

But I do care what market is saying.

I'm billyjoe. Pleased to meet ya. I'll be the one taking all your coins. Don't worry. I'll take good care of them.



564. Post 5301153 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 22, 2014, 03:44:35 PM
gox moving up
Like a bottle rocket. no movement on Stamp yet.



565. Post 5303901 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Gotta give Tera credit for calling the spike at $619.88 within 12 cents.



566. Post 5305419 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 22, 2014, 07:41:55 PM
hourly downtrend is likely to reverse above 584, the intersection with the daily uptrend baseline since the 530 bottom.  15 minute uptrend is too steep to last more than another hour.  i'm guessing it turns down between 603 and 606. then reverses again at 585. gox seems likely to drop below 150 within the day before exceeding the day's high.

35 min to go. Care to revise your statement?



567. Post 5305646 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 22, 2014, 07:41:55 PM
hourly downtrend is likely to reverse above 584, the intersection with the daily uptrend baseline since the 530 bottom.  15 minute uptrend is too steep to last more than another hour.  i'm guessing it turns down between 603 and 606. then reverses again at 585. gox seems likely to drop below 150 within the day before exceeding the day's high.

Aminorex my friend this is just a bag of wrong so far.



568. Post 5305795 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: smoothie on February 22, 2014, 08:07:09 PM
Gotta give Tera credit for calling the spike at $619.88 within 12 cents.

Yes I agree nice call.

I still don't see how "sheep" who bought at $585 are going to get slaughtered. Still grazing happily.



569. Post 5306098 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 22, 2014, 09:08:23 PM
I took my profits even before the DDOS hit.  The rumour this rally is based on is bull fud and the market will be back close to what it was within 8 hours.

I sold a tiny bit myself, but I'm less confident than you are.



570. Post 5306377 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 22, 2014, 09:26:10 PM
The sooner this all is over.. the sooner can break that ATH of $1200. $2500 and beyond.

I say the exchanges should get together and just decide to set their price minimum at $2000 and be done with the waiting. Agreed?

This is why the accusations that early adopters colluded to keep prices up is bullshit. The greater the profit from the scheme, the greater the incentive to defect and screw your fellow conspirators. The queue to sell your $2000 coins would take about as long to work through as waiting for the price to naturally hit that level.

Alternatively, you could just buy up all cheaper coins for billions. Janet? Bill? Warren?



571. Post 5306422 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: Arcas on February 22, 2014, 09:41:18 PM
Ukrainian government has fallen. President has fled.  

Fled to Kharkiv.  East Ukraine vs. West Ukraine split perhaps?

Yep, he fled off to area where prorussians are majority. That's far from over yet, I'm afraid, specially if Russia gets involved.
I think the important question is, How can we profit from this?

Simple. Borrow Ukranian sheckles or whatever and buy bitcoin.



572. Post 5307194 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Ukrainian currency is the Hyrvnia. GDP is $175 billion with less than $4,000 per capita. Jesus, those people are poor. Russia's warming up the tanks but waiting until the Olympics are over before asserting influence. The next 24 hours will be interesting.



573. Post 5307437 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 22, 2014, 09:07:15 PM
35 min to go. Care to revise your statement?
always.  now i say 588 in 8 hours.

Keep trying, Amigo.




574. Post 5307535 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Am I the only one who noticed that the Gox bottom really does look like an ass?



575. Post 5307823 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 22, 2014, 11:09:28 PM
I forgot to mention one thing: MtGox has earned over 6k BTC the past two weeks.

If, when they locked the exit gates, the sum of all their client BTC accounts was X, then, in spite of all the trading that has happened there, they still owe X-6000 BTC to all their clients.  (Unless MtGOX itself has been buying BTC from their trapped clients, at their current panic price; which would be the closest think to armed robbery that they could do.)

Their trapped clients seem to think that Y, the amount of real BTC that MtGOX currently owns, is about 1/3 of X-6000.  Although that perception may change rapidly on faint echos of rumors.

Anyone dares to guess what was the value of X (basically, the total supply of goxBTC)?  (Note that the total volume traded at MtGOX over the last two weeks may not be a reliable estimate, since there may be many goxBTC that were not traded once in all that time, and many that got traded several times.)

Even if they only have 1/3 of X, with withdrawal limits, they may be able to grow their way out of the hole they are in. Most banks have far less than 1/3 of depositors funds. Factor in the fresh fiat from arbitragers and they can operate a long time before being forced to admit they are insolvent. Cashflow is king.  All this fiasco will likely cost them in the long run is market share.



576. Post 5307987 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

I also thing the Xaction malleability hackers kept doubling down and got caught with a bunch of BTC in Gox's hot wallet when the music stopped. Those funds may soon be available to honest clients, buying Mark even more time. The network DDOS was an attempt to cover their tracks that probably didn't work. These are likely verified accounts and it's likely we'll know who the perpetrators were.

Like Churchill said of Americans, you can always count on Gox to do the right thing, after it has exhausted all the other options.



577. Post 5308126 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Goxcoin on the march again. Stamp soon to follow.



578. Post 5308333 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Bad timing, FUDsters. Try again in a few hours. Man, the possibility of a short squeeze has got to be starting to worry you.



579. Post 5308364 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Goxcoin @ $250!! 



580. Post 5308863 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: TERA on February 23, 2014, 12:22:30 AM
Can someone explain again the dynamics how the price of goxcoin has an exact reflection on the price of bitstamp on a minute to minute basis? I know that the (possible) reenabling of withdrawals on mtgox has implications for each price but the implications should be somewhat different and have a different type of effect on the price a short term basis. They are trading in two different segregated environments with completely different forces and the fluctuations should at least be different.



There's about a 2 minute lag. Pretty damn profitable for me today! Not too hard to figure out. Goxcoin price is about solvency probabilities. The worry of dumping goxcoin in arbitrage has been dampened by bitcoinbuilder. Market is saying Gox is still shitty but more likely solvent.



581. Post 5309104 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 23, 2014, 01:02:48 AM
some of those charts are way scarier than gox lately

-> http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-02-22/just-12-wtf-charts

bonus from the article:

Quote
SPX vs The Federal Reserve Balance Sheet - The Truth

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I saw that and I was thinking the same thing. The "All in?" article also on ZH suggests Yellen and Co are probably gonna untaper despite their jawboning. Bullish for BTC and PMs. Bullish for debtors. Nobody is buying Janet's Volker impersonation.



582. Post 5309505 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: TERA on February 22, 2014, 01:33:00 PM
49 cents down. Damn Tera, those sheep are gettin' slaughtered.
The trap has not finished yet. There is room on the chart for a false breakout to 600 (with maybe a flashspike to 620). The slaughter happens after this breakout fails only for people to find that not only are prices declining below 580 but that they are now trapped inside a giant triangle breakdown of 530 into the 400s.

Called the spike almost exactly T, but this is looking like an actual breakout. I sold a little just in case. Still no sign of the kind of reversal you are suggesting, just a leveling out. Time will tell.



583. Post 5309889 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 23, 2014, 01:50:48 AM

I'm not certain why people seem so easily scammed but I don't believe it's just this community. My opinion is that it may have a tiny bit to do with Libertarianism because their philosophy is that regulation shouldn't come from The State but from the community instead. Correct me where I'm wrong, Libertarians, I believe the hardcore among them prefer the community to "regulate" rogue companies/people. Caveat Emptor reigns. If someone rips you off then you don't do business there again and make sure your neighbors know. So they're willing to show more trust up front often if they haven't heard a reason not to, and that is a scammer's paradise. Shout out to the Bitcoin scammer's go-to ploy: the Pre-Order. Also the community is popular with younger folks who can be more naive concerning the nature of their fellow man.

The nature of Bitcoin as currency sorta flips commerce on its head. Normally we get service first then pay, or we have an intermediary like a credit card company agree to pay if a service provider needs payment first. With Bitcoin service providers want payment first and there is no safety net. It's not common to use escrow with Bitcoin. This leaves a wide window for scams.


I'm not sure where you get the idea that Libertarians show a lot of trust. I don't. I could have made a mint off of bitcoinbuilder but I didn't know the guy and didn't trust the site. I trust people to act in their own perceived best interest only. It's why I'm shocked that Mark could just let his exchange bleed market share for months.

Reputation is everything when you don't believe in initiating force. Opportunity costs are the only costs we can impose, and they are more than sufficient in the vast majority of cases. But we also believe that every problem in the free market is an opportunity for an enterprising entrepreneur. If the only exchange in your country is run by someone who lost/stole coins, start another one.

Scammers can only take your money if you let them. Governments take your money by threat of force. Taxes are theft even if the money is ostensibly spent for our benefit because it's involuntary. I prefer dealing with scammers.



584. Post 5310068 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 23, 2014, 02:00:20 AM
so the way i see it is we had pretty much some support testing at around 530$ (on stamp) with lower resistances upward.





this trend is very likely to break downwards.

Looks like we're closer to breaking higher, Hoss.



585. Post 5310128 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 23, 2014, 02:26:05 AM
Scammers can only take your money if you let them. Governments take your money by threat of force. Taxes are theft even if the money is ostensibly spent for our benefit because it's involuntary. I prefer dealing with scammers.

Thanks for the reply.  Well, I am surprised. 

I would never deal with someone if I know that he has scammed someone else,  I would not think that I am smart enough to outsmart him.  I guess it is a matter of temperament, like aversion to risk.



It's simple to deal with scammers. You just make sure they have more to lose than you do if they don't pull through and you make sure they know that. If you are not in a position to use that kind of leverage, don't do business with them. You have to manage your own reputation more so than theirs because the threat of imposing opportunity costs must be credible. You miss too many opportunities with excessive risk aversion.



586. Post 5310300 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Weird. Good-sized buy on Stamp had nothing to do with Gox. China, maybe? 15 minute chart uptrend still intact! 



587. Post 5310394 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: TERA on February 23, 2014, 03:15:14 AM
If this gox rally continues, there may be a possible extension of the bull trap to ~660, like so:



This is exactly what I was talking about last night which I was worried about not being there. With it being there, it would be complete with the patterns of previous years.

Don't you get tired of being wrong all the time? At least I can't accuse you of just telling people what they want to hear.



588. Post 5310589 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

$2 away from a new daily high. Sooooo close.



589. Post 5310617 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

That surprise buy on stamp out of nowhere prolly came from Coinbase. The buy and sell spread @ CB is much greater now.



590. Post 5310661 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Now Gox taking over and extending the rally. It just keeps going!



591. Post 5310722 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

New daily High!!!   



592. Post 5311009 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Momentum chasers, here's your chance to get back on the train. This trend still has legs.



593. Post 5311386 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: MikeH on February 23, 2014, 04:41:38 AM
Please Bitcoin, explode to $5000, I want to move to Turkey and buy something like this:

http://www.tuerkei-immo.org/Immobilie-in-Alanya-Details32241.htm#

yea I want out of Australia too - I just don't know of any truly independent and non-corrupt place to go to though.

That's why you need a yacht. Big one. need more bitcoin.



594. Post 5311473 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: TERA on February 23, 2014, 04:51:22 AM
Volume, what volume? 24 hour stamp volme: 20K... clearly a trap. There are all kinds of resistances in the 600s based on longer charts. Do you really thing we're ready to break through them all just because gox and on this low volume?

LOL. Wouldn't want those sheep who bought at $585 to get slaughtered, right? Go play in your giant triangle. No bull trap frightens you. Bull trap frightens you. Making money frightens you because you might lose it. Were you the hall monitor in middle school?



595. Post 5311539 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: MikeH on February 23, 2014, 04:41:38 AM
Please Bitcoin, explode to $5000, I want to move to Turkey and buy something like this:

http://www.tuerkei-immo.org/Immobilie-in-Alanya-Details32241.htm#

yea I want out of Australia too - I just don't know of any truly independent and non-corrupt place to go to though.

http://sailzingara.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/12073644-yacht-zingara-at-anchor-in-the-virgin-islands.jpg



596. Post 5315701 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: TERA on February 23, 2014, 12:22:41 PM
I posted a picture of the 3 day ema chart to try to warn you guys,  with the EMAs at 655 and 690. Obviously it wasn't going anywhere, there was no room to go. It's going to have to trade sideways and consolidate for a while and do a lot of volume before it breaks that. The MACD is nowhere close.

What are you talking about? I told you that rally still had legs and it did. Anyone who sold in the $630s made a tidy profit no thanks to you, Gloomy. All you had to do was buy close to the $530 level that you said wouldn't hold and BOOM! mo money mo profits. Can't sell at a profit if you don't buy in the first place.



597. Post 5316350 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: jonoiv on February 23, 2014, 01:08:52 PM
The only reason
Please see my thread "problems besides mtgox" to learn about the 20 other things going on besides mtgox.

read it and agree with most of it.  Bitcoins not finished, but people paying + $600, are just clinging on to their dream in my opinion..

I might come back when BTC is back around $100.  feel very sorry for those that brought and held at + $900

regulation issues
legal issues
technical issues
community trust issues

where would serious new investment come from under these conditions?



Lol. There's enough fiat sitting in exchanges today to take the price to >$1500.

Really. Some of you simply astound me.


then why haven't they brought coins yet?  

I have some $ there too,  and I'm not buying because, well, how can I sleep knowing I am holding BTC at the moment...

Sleep is overrated. All yer gonna do is dream of skittles-pooping unicorns and risk-free profit anyway.



598. Post 5317579 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

My dad bought at $31/BTC in 2011 and held. Was that a bad move and if not, Why is holding coins bought at $1000 a bad move?

The ONLY way you're gonna lose money is by selling below your buy price. The ONLY way you're gonna lose is by listening to assholes who are telling you to cut losses.



599. Post 5318366 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: mmitech on February 23, 2014, 03:23:55 PM
My dad bought at $31/BTC in 2011 and held. Was that a bad move and if not, Why is holding coins bought at $1000 a bad move?

The ONLY way you're gonna lose money is by selling below your buy price. The ONLY way you're gonna lose is by listening to assholes who are telling you to cut losses.

And what about the assholes telling everyone to hold at $1000 when we have seen prices half of that? Assholes like you, for example?

The next few days when the price will drop dramatically I will see what these people will say, just try to play it safe....

Prices plummeted to $3 in 2011 and those who held still are looking really good now.  This is Bitcoin. Prices fluctuate and only those with the discipline to hold will keep their coins. If you can't just sit their while your portfolio loses value, then BUY MOAR.

Thinking in terms of days is not a good idea. Nobody who has owned bitcoin less than a year has any business day trading. You don't know the market. I recommend two years.  Until then, buy and hold.



600. Post 5318672 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: mmitech on February 23, 2014, 03:59:57 PM
My dad bought at $31/BTC in 2011 and held. Was that a bad move and if not, Why is holding coins bought at $1000 a bad move?

The ONLY way you're gonna lose money is by selling below your buy price. The ONLY way you're gonna lose is by listening to assholes who are telling you to cut losses.

And what about the assholes telling everyone to hold at $1000 when we have seen prices half of that? Assholes like you, for example?

The next few days when the price will drop dramatically I will see what these people will say, just try to play it safe....

Prices plummeted to $3 in 2011 and those who held still are looking really good now.  This is Bitcoin. Prices fluctuate and only those with the discipline to hold will keep their coins. If you can't just sit their while your portfolio loses value, then BUY MOAR.

Thinking in terms of days is not a good idea. Nobody who has owned bitcoin less than a year has any business day trading. You don't know the market. I recommend two years.  Until then, buy and hold.


where were you since 2011 ? and BTW I will add this: I do not only speculate about Bitcoin price but I also help push the infrastructure by doing helpful stuff that you may not know about me...so I will advise your smart ass to go do something helpful rather than bitching on this thread, now that we all know you are a Hodler stop spamming this thread with nonsense...

Who's bitching? Are you having a bad day? You seem kinda grumpy.



601. Post 5318937 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: mmitech on February 23, 2014, 04:12:45 PM


you spend most of your time on this sub-forum and most of your posts are in this thread, and most of thing comes out your keyboard is only trashing people when they try to observe the price movements, it is cool when they say CCMF, but you trash them when they say they think there will be a drop !!!!

the title of this thread is  Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion so if you don't like both price arguments go spend your time on something that is really helpful for the eco-system.

I think what really gets to you is that I'm almost always right. It must burn you that a permabull can eat your lunch even in a bear market. It's ok. I don't take it personally. Someone has to be on the losing end of the trade ;-)



602. Post 5319020 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: flynn on February 23, 2014, 04:20:48 PM
@billyjoeallen ; Huh? o_O You never sleep ?

I'd like to say I don't sleep, but I just keep irregular hours and leave the computer on. Move on. Nothing to see here.



603. Post 5319545 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

The second bottom formed at $530. I called it and made money buying back in three times so far. If the level is tested again, I'll have three times as much fiat to defend it. I can't lose. If it goes down to that level again, I get my coins back on the cheap. If it keeps sinking, I buy even MOAR. If it goes up from here, Then I guess I can spend my fiat on hookers and blow. The point is I didn't get in a position where I could do this if I didn't BUY AND HOLD for a couple of years.

Ya gots ta pay yer dues, Boys and Girls.




604. Post 5319819 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: mmitech on February 23, 2014, 05:10:35 PM

and BTW I don't trade daily, I wait for occasions when I think it is safe and clear for some profit, my posts was just a reminder that this is the speculation thread, no need to attack other people, I him attacking other members and calling his mom names (only teenagers does that)...... so you are missing my point here


The guy said we were going below 500 and we shot up like a rocket! If he wants to be a credit to his mother, he should have made the right call. You want etiquette or do you want accurate analysis? I know a shitload of poor people who are polite as hell. They have to be.



605. Post 5320213 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: dreamspark on February 23, 2014, 05:29:50 PM
Gox trying to rally again

Stamp price isn't as sensitive to Gox since the Coinbase buy-in last night, but CB prices are rising and if they run out of coins in their hotwallet, they will reload from Stamp, driving price up there as well. Currently ~$3 higher in San Fran.



606. Post 5320596 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: mmitech on February 23, 2014, 05:52:31 PM
Some would call me a troll, but here you go

No coins at all. Fail.



607. Post 5320773 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: Holliday on February 23, 2014, 06:07:24 PM
Some would call me a troll, but here you go

No coins at all. Fail.

No coins on an exchange. I would call that a win! Wink

Good point. I retract and apologize.  mmitech, You may want to keep your coincount to yourself. It's not worth exposing your total stash just to win a pecker-flexing contest.



608. Post 5321265 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Yes, less than a thousand. I lost some on bitoption, bitmarket.eu and tradehill when they closed.



609. Post 5321708 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: Ivanhoe on February 23, 2014, 07:01:57 PM
Although, I still think Bitcoin is extremely undervalued, but I try to avoid talking about the exchange rate (I'm biased). A fucking messaging app sold for $19 billion... I know it's apples and oranges, but Bitcoin provides far, far more utility than a messaging app.

Like that comparison. Hadn't thought of that one.
Quote

The more I think about it, the more interesting it becomes (in my mind).

Bitcoin can be seen as free speech, from the right perspective. Transactions are shouted to the world, and the world decides to write them in stone. If you want to stop bitcoin, you are infringing on the freedom of speech. (I can no longer share this information with the network.) Every thing is open and available for the world to audit. The servers are decentralized.

Now this messaging app is also a form of speech, but it's proprietary. There is nothing free about it. The source is closed. The servers are centralized. (I'm making some assumptions here, I didn't bother to do any research. If I'm wrong, my bad.)

WTF is wrong with the world when this messaging app is worth billions of dollars? Fuck it, Bitcoin will probably fail because people are ignorant assholes! Wink


Because they are being held dumb by their governments, our task is to teach them.

The U.S. Supreme court ruled that money is speech. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission
But as far as I know, only California has determined that Bitcoin is money. I actually agree with those that hold that its a commodity. It may become money at some point, but not yet.



610. Post 5323990 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

"If this situation will be handled down in a serious way, nobody will kill you."

"handled down"? Doesn't appear to be a native English speaker. Something like "All your Gox are belong to us."




611. Post 5324145 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 23, 2014, 09:12:01 PM
"If this situation will be handled down in a serious way, nobody will kill you."

"handled down"? Doesn't appear to be a native English speaker. Something like "All your Gox are belong to us."

Range trading cracks me up. How many times are these panic monkeys gonna sell me the same coins at $550 and buy them back higher?
Maybe I'll wait for $540 this time.



612. Post 5324607 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Aussies Goxxed

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-02-23/seen-atm-western-australia




613. Post 5325351 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: Vycid on February 23, 2014, 10:15:52 PM

This ignores the 2011 bubble ratio (~1:16), which would have us back down to low double digits.

I don't think the "bubble projection method" is necessarily informative anyway.

The 2011 bubble rose 32:1 and then crashed 16:1 and of course there was the first major Gox hack to complicate things and no other major exchanges for an alternative. It's not intended to prove $530 has to be the bottom, only that it reasonably could be. This is sound analysis.



614. Post 5325651 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 23, 2014, 10:35:16 PM
End of Chinese Slumber Stuff.  Stop skipping posts.

Jorge, please tell all your friends especially in Latin America (Bitcoin's final frontier) to sell all they own and put it into Bitcoin. I just learned it's going to go up 1000X. Just between us, buddy. Shhh....
http://www.bit-sky.com/index.php/english/370-chinese-corrupted-officers-will-push-bitcoin-price-up-1000-times

All joking aside, I imagine the outgoing Ukrainian officials are wishing they had parked more of their wealth in crypto.



615. Post 5325750 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: SilverandBitcoins on February 23, 2014, 11:00:30 PM
Many on this thread and a couple of other forum threads have accurately called/predicted this price pull/back.  How do they do it?  Are they basing their forcasts on past performance of Bitcoin and charts?

It's easy. Here, I'll do it again: After the next rally, there will be a pullback.

See how easy that was? It's a gift, really. I need to be on CNBC.



616. Post 5328419 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 24, 2014, 02:14:23 AM


Somebody's trying to train the honey badger. Ain't gonna work.



617. Post 5329476 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 24, 2014, 03:57:50 AM
Wow I was on page 5024, started watching an 20 min episode of family guy and in 20 mins 6 new pages were written here. And I cant see any movement on stamp  Cheesy

Everybody in panic mode

10K wall appeared

down to 8.7k now

very interesting

much popcorn

such thrill!

So when I wake up in 8hrs I hope all my orders down to 430 gets filled  Cheesy

gn8 and have fun...

i'm in 540 because i like what i see.

Right with ya, Hoss.



618. Post 5330067 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: Vycid on February 24, 2014, 04:57:18 AM
Is anyone else struck by the irony that the community has been demanding Mark's resignation for weeks now, but when he actually resigns the market responds with a 50% drop?

Is that accurate, or is there some part I'm missing here?

Gox is not the market.



619. Post 5330123 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: surfer43 on February 24, 2014, 05:05:19 AM
Is anyone else struck by the irony that the community has been demanding Mark's resignation for weeks now, but when he actually resigns the market responds with a 50% drop?

Is that accurate, or is there some part I'm missing here?

Gox is not the market.
The market was referring to the goxcoin market  Roll Eyes

The community demanding Mark's resignation is the greater community and the greater market, therefor this is not ironic.



620. Post 5337371 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

remarkable lack of panic. Hat tip to all you lovable opportunists out there.



621. Post 5337508 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

So here I was thinking with that monster wall up, I can finally take my eyes off the chart for a little while, but noooooooo. I blinked and missed it.



622. Post 5337690 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: seleme on February 24, 2014, 02:09:22 PM
Could this really be bottom if we survive today?
Why would it be over today? This is the first wave of insider arbitrage from gox to elsewhere (probably almost all going to stamp though)

I said "could it be" Cheesy

My orders are below 500 for now and as much as I would like them to be filled, the pleasure of billyjeansomething being proved idiot would be even bigger  Grin

Never went below $500, Momma's Boy.



623. Post 5337908 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

So the question is how many people are gonna wake up and see their limit orders filled and want to cash out vs. how many are gonna turn bullish?

A whale dumb enough to give away $150,000 is not going to buy back in lower, but may buy in higher in a few weeks.



624. Post 5338123 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: seleme on February 24, 2014, 02:13:21 PM

Never said it did dumb fuck  Grin

You gotta love how MR. Civility shows he's just as vulgar as the rest of us when he's almost right. Congrats, Bro. Now you're still wrong and you have no moral high ground. I've made more fiat, more BTC, and shown you to be a hypocrite. If that's what it takes to be a dumb fuck, I'll take it.



625. Post 5338635 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: seleme on February 24, 2014, 02:41:45 PM

Never said it did dumb fuck  Grin

You gotta love how MR. Civility shows he's just as vulgar as the rest of us when he's almost right. Congrats, Bro. Now you're still wrong and you have no moral high ground. I've made more fiat, more BTC, and shown you to be a hypocrite. If that's what it takes to be a dumb fuck, I'll take it.

Of course I do you utter moron, I have no problems calling you dumb fuck or any other name on the world because that's what you are, piece of low life, but I have enough decency to leave your family out of that, I doubt they wanted you to come out as such a piece of shit.

Have enough decency to make an accurate market call, then. Some guy dumps enough BTC to sink the Titanic and it's barely a hiccup on the chart. I was wrong about my $530 bottom call made BEFORE the Xaction malleability hack. I own it. I am not clairvoyant, but considering how much stress this market has taken, it could have been much much worse. It would be a shame if you lost out on cheap coins because you were juuust a tiny bit too greedy.

And if yer gonna try and insult me, at least try to be a little more clever. Have fun with it. I'm a big boy. I can take it.



626. Post 5338762 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

These market dips are getting ridiculously predictable. I bought in at $550, $550, $550, $540 and still in the green!  Am I a genius or is this just good karma from all the ugly girls I've had sex with?



627. Post 5338893 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on February 24, 2014, 03:12:21 PM
These market dips are getting ridiculously predictable. I bought in at $550, $550, $550, $540 and still in the green!  Am I a genius or is this just good karma from all the ugly girls I've had sex with?

Predict the next dip and you will get a free tranny!  Cheesy

Moving my buy orders back up to $550. One whale does not a pod make.



628. Post 5339081 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: kkaspar on February 24, 2014, 03:25:31 PM

Have enough decency to make an accurate market call, then. Some guy dumps enough BTC to sink the Titanic and it's barely a hiccup on the chart. I was wrong about my $530 bottom call made BEFORE the Xaction malleability hack. I own it. I am not clairvoyant, but considering how much stress this market has taken, it could have been much much worse. It would be a shame if you lost out on cheap coins because you were juuust a tiny bit too greedy.

And if yer gonna try and insult me, at least try to be a little more clever. Have fun with it. I'm a big boy. I can take it.

I'm sorry, but if you had any clue about the nature of this market, then you would know that you could expect absolutely anything from  this current period. So, any price predictions made from graphs are currently a joke. Too many things in the air that could destroy bitcoin if enough bad things fall together. The most knowledgeable way to trade right now is not to trade, because you can't know the needed variables if you aren't an insider.

If you had any clue about this market, you'd know that nothing short of zombie apocalypse could destroy Bitcoin. Do you know what "anti-fragile" means?



629. Post 5339743 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: kkaspar on February 24, 2014, 03:42:24 PM
If you had any clue about this market, you'd know that nothing short of zombie apocalypse could destroy Bitcoin. Do you know what "anti-fragile" means?

Well, you are "a true believer".. what can I say. There is no point in converting someones religion.
What I see, is that the majority already has doubts that bitcoin is an pyramid/ponzi scheme. When it turns out that people lost their money on gox, then the media won't care if mtgox is to blame. The story that will get published is that people lost their money who invested in bitcoin, because this is the hot subject. Bitcoin will be known as a tool for crooks like Karpeles for scamming people. Bitcoin enthusiasts will be ridiculed as cultists or just as simple-minded victims. Companies together with serious investors will want to distance themselves as much as possible.
I believe that bitcoin won't entirely die by this, because there will be loads of religious people left behind who won't give up their beliefs. But it will regress into the play money status that can be used to buy drugs. Basically the same it was 2-3 years ago.

I am a true believer, which, considering I rejected both patriotism and Christianity as both insufficiently supported by the evidence, should give you pause. These were beliefs I was indoctrinated with since birth. Empirical skepticism is my modus operandi. So I wouldn't be betting my life savings on something just because I WANT it to work. It will work. If I made a wrong call and the market drops from here, you know who will bail me out? That guy with the sexy mother who hates my guts. He'll buy lower and someone else will buy lower than him. That's anti-fragile. The worse the price gets, the more attractive it is for someone looking to get in cheap.



630. Post 5340243 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: kkaspar on February 24, 2014, 04:14:14 PM
The media may be a joke in an intellectual aspect, but it does have influence among the majority. Bitcoiners tend to forget how important is this halo of freedom and liberty that glows around bitcoin. Bitcoin is mostly sold by arguments that by investing in bitcoin, you are investing against global banking and you are pro-freedom. Most of bitcoin success has been caused by the failures of global banking and the increasing unpopularity that comes with it. If it turns out that bitcoin is no different, and you still have to trust fraudalent people for it to hold value, then it's very hard to sell bitcoin.

You don't get it. Bitcoin's success won't be determined by fraudsters, hackers, the media, regulators or the Bitcoin foundation. This only determines the speed of adoption. It only allows smart money to get in at a lower price, improvements of the code, increased transparency and diversification of exchanges which will stabilize things in the future. Almost everything that is bad for Bitcoin the the short term makes it better in the long run. It doesn't even matter if some other cryptocurrency takes top spot. Ten years from no when there is still less than 20 million bitcoin and world population is over 12 billion, it will be worth much more than now.



631. Post 5340625 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Um, I have hundreds of coins with an average buy in of ~$30. I could have had much much more than I have, but there's not a person on this forum who couldn't say that. Hindsight is 20/20. You can benefit from my experience or you can make your own profits and mistakes. I'm in the green and sitting pretty so I don't have to worry about little fluctuations or your opinion of me.

Anyone following my $530 bottom call has made money, even if the numbers didn't exactly match. Anyone waiting for $500 coins is still waiting. Fact.






632. Post 5340807 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on February 24, 2014, 05:00:42 PM
Gox just admitted insolvency...

Link?



633. Post 5341188 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

I'll hold that bag at $550, Boys. I threw back all those falling knives so all I have in my hands now is a big pile of fiat I want to get rid of.



634. Post 5342695 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: empowering on February 24, 2014, 05:31:53 PM


To an extent I agree I do not think this is a Higlander scenario

There can be more than one


Money is the ultimate network effect. How is any other crytpcoin supposed to have less volatility than the one with the largest market cap? If volatility slows adoption, and I think we all agree that it does, then it's a huge hurdle to overcome.



635. Post 5342769 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 24, 2014, 06:16:51 PM
I'll hold that bag at $550, Boys. I threw back all those falling knives so all I have in my hands now is a big pile of fiat I want to get rid of.

good!
post your trading history or screenshots, so we can mock you later.

BJ Allen's purse for holding his "big pile" of fiat...


LOL not down to $550 on CoinBase yet! C'mon, I want my coins back.



636. Post 5343435 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

So apparently the market blew right through my price point while I was at lunch. Shouldn't be a problem if all you doomers are right and this down trend holds for just a little longer. I'll get a second shot.  Ironically I had to go to appointment to meet a local buyer. Hope anyone following my trades got some coin.



637. Post 5344412 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: empowering on February 24, 2014, 07:23:24 PM


To an extent I agree I do not think this is a Higlander scenario

There can be more than one


Money is the ultimate network effect. How is any other crytpcoin supposed to have less volatility than the one with the largest market cap? If volatility slows adoption, and I think we all agree that it does, then it's a huge hurdle to overcome.


Money is the ultimate network effect.

I hear you and I am a true beliver in the power of the network effect if a company/coin is lucky enough to ride that wave (after wave, after wave, eeek Tsunami)

But

A coin that was more evenly distributed with no huge holders, that traded on an exchange with high liquidity or a decentralised peer to peer exchange between wallet holders, with a baked in exchange into the client.... may have less volatility.

Also I think that volatility is what caught a lot of peoples attention to Bitcoin... so it is a double edged sword.

Also something great may come along, I am already diversified, I like Bitcoin but I also like some other cryptos that are popping up, dare I mention them here
but like Nxt and Mastercoin, Protoshares that I think may have some potential , especially with the DAC's and colour coins etc...  there is the potential to create some stable currencies using those protocols, as well as peer to peer exchange, and also like it or not as a concept, as a business the forging aspect of Nxt, if they can continue to grow and develop, is quite interesting, especially if you have a large number of Nxt, so there is reason to invest in the network and "forge" from there if the platform develops into something of use, which people can build onto , which is the idea, and if the community can reach out and encourage adoption because it provides solutions and profitable opportunites, then yes I can see another crypto doing quite well... does that mean it will dwarf Bitcoin, no... infact I am more inclined to think that the next "big and useful" coin we see will not get its next leg up, until Bitcoin has its next leg up... ie if Bitcoin jumps to $5000 and drags the marketcap up to 60 billionish then I can see coins like Litecoin, Nxt ** etc catching a ride on the coattails  and increasing their marketcaps potentially by several billion+ ......which then would have a knock on effect, money is the ultimate network effect... and those development bounties that are out there would all suddenly have a lot more bang for their respective crypto buck, which means they can spend more on developing more , more marketing etc...
 
Also as Bitcoin becomes more mainstream it is carving the path, and in doing so , doing a lot of the grunt work.. if people do get comfortable with Bitcoin, they are more likely to give another crypto a go that goes for traders/merchants and individuals even the media.
 
I am playing devils advocate here ! and I do think that Bitcoin remains the mothership for now, and most likely for sometime, the network headstart is huge, and so is the headstart for adoption rates, ecosystem, investment rates, public awareness, vested interests, regulations, users, marketcap, etc  but never say never is my moto.

 The other thing is that some Goliath of a corporation could try to give it a go.. one with a huge market share already in a symbotic industry that could evolve a concept and role it out to the masses with their already in place marketing machine and vast funds to throw at it and the masses would lap it up, and not care that it was not decentralised and not care that it was funded by "the usual suspects" that is also possible..

 **Yes even dare I say it Ripple and fcking Dogecoin because wow

That's a thoughtful analysis. The reason I doubt corpcoin will unseat Bitcoin is because so few companies are able to leverage their market position into other growth industries.  Microsoft had max leverage and gave us Office and XBox, but almost all of their other dozens of attempts fell flat. Google gives us Google Plus and almost as many other failed examples. MySpace didn't get creamed by Yahoo, but by another nimble startup, FB. There's danger in straying too far from your core competencies.  There are exceptions, of course. Who would have thought 20 years ago that Apple would be a phone company? Still, Apple and Facebook are the exceptions that prove the rule.

MS still rules the roost in operating systems and Bitcoin will likely do the same for Crypto. The differences are they are at vastly different stages in their life-cycle, but more importantly Bitcoin by virtue of being a distributed autonomous corporation is immune to rent-seeking behavior of it's management. 



638. Post 5344790 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Ok, I pulled the trigger at Coinbase and got my coins back. I am now preparing to get even more new coins at even lower prices with the rest of you vultures. It's gonna jack my average buy-in price sky high, but I can't think of a more oversold asset to park in outside of Miley Cyrus' bedroom.



639. Post 5349121 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

anybody have the number of a reputable loan shark?



640. Post 5349341 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 25, 2014, 12:20:52 AM
anybody have the number of a reputable loan shark?

... you might have a gambling problem

Well, there goes the light bill money. What? I can use candles...



641. Post 5349607 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: relm9 on February 25, 2014, 12:46:36 AM
Coinbase ran out of coins for today, seeing this message

Quote
Note! We've exceeded our normal buy limits for today. If you would still like to purchase you will receive the market price of bitcoin on Friday Feb 28, 2014 at 04:45PM PST after your funds have arrived. read more

 Grin


NOOOOOOOOoooooo! Clearly I am not drunk enough.



642. Post 5349930 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

CB is out of coins, but I am not out of vodka! Continue the fight, Brothers. I'm with you in spirit...or spirits...or something. Fuck me.



643. Post 5350331 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: MNDan on February 25, 2014, 01:20:03 AM
Coins are back at Coinbase - just picked up a bunch at $520. Sweet...hopefully.

Bought that tranche before they ran out. I need cheaper coins! I am not stealing from my girlfriend's purse to buy coins until they are under $510.

[edit] my soon-to-be ex-girlfriend. We're not gonna see a new ATH for many months if not years. I should preemptively break up with her. Vaseline is cheaper.

is Vodka made out of love? it's so smooth...



644. Post 5350411 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Windy's a douche. Should be buying douchecoins. Such douche...


I am drinking pi shots per minute followed by Avagadro's number of beer chasers with Fibonacci retracement



645. Post 5350446 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: meanig on February 25, 2014, 01:43:08 AM
For anyone still interested in true and verified news Playboy has started using BitPay

http://www.coindesk.com/playboy-plus-accepting-bitcoin-payments/

Quote
Playboy, the iconic media company that publishes Playboy magazine, is now accepting bitcoin payments for its adult entertainment content through at least one of its web properties.

Though not yet formally announced to the public, the payment option is currently live on the Playboy Plus website, and is available to those purchasing one-month, six-month and lifetime memberships through Georgia-based merchant processor BitPay.

Formerly the Playboy Cyber Club, according to its official Twitter account, Playboy Plus is an online component to Playboy magazine that provides original nude picture content.

Playboy’s online branded assets are operated by Montreal-based adult entertainment conglomerate MindGeek, and as such, the bitcoin rollout appears to be part of a broader move toward acceptance from MindGeek, not necessarily Playboy.


I'm gonna need that for a few months!! porn is so much better than real live bitchy unreasonable demanding soft warm chicks

cup and handle formation on my liquor cabinet!!!!



646. Post 5350569 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

I am calling the BOTTOM of my drink.



647. Post 5350639 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

FUD doesn't have to be accurate. It just has to be effective. On the positive side, I hear taht sometimes you can go six months without making a mortgage payment before they kick you out.  schwweeeet



648. Post 5350755 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

You fuckers don't understand us hodlers

Quote from: billyjoeallen on June 05, 2011, 04:27:30 AM

I don't care about the busts. I am riding this pig wherever it takes me. If it tanks, I'll have a helluva story to tell. I'm sick of half measures. I'm swinging for the fences and If I strike out, so be it.  I won't be some mediocre drone living a life of quiet desperation. I believe in bitcoin and I'm going for broke, knowing the risks. 

Yeah, that was me.  Every time you go to battle, you have to ask yourself "is this the hill I want to die on?" Bitcoin is my hill. You can crush me to bits, but you won't get my coins. fact.



649. Post 5350859 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

$509 tranche brought to you by Discover card. Discover the possibilities.



650. Post 5351100 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

$482 tranche brought to you by VISA. it's everywhere you want to be



651. Post 5351118 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: seleme on February 25, 2014, 02:32:17 AM
Yeah, that was me.  Every time you go to battle, you have to ask yourself "is this the hill I want to die on?" Bitcoin is my hill. You can crush me to bits, but you won't get my coins. fact.

What about them $550 coins you were telling us about earlier?

Can it be billyjoeallen proven absolutely and utterly 100% WRONG again!?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


On scale of 29 to 30, how stupid he must feel now?

Pretty damn drunk. I'll feel stupid tomorrow. Congrats, Seleme. Good call.



652. Post 5353319 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

$464 tranche brought to you by Mastercard. Fuuuuuuck I'm drunk. This sucks.



653. Post 5363508 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 25, 2014, 02:36:18 PM
BitcoinRain was a Brazilian "bitcoin investment fund" that operated from Oct/2011 to Apr/2013.  It took the investor's BTC and promised a minimum 9% monthly return in BTC to them.

Any fund that promises those kinds of returns is going to be a scam. That's a no-brainer. Nobody who makes real returns like that needs new investors.



654. Post 5364570 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: TERA on February 25, 2014, 01:49:39 PM
Even IF bottom was reached, there is still a lot of work to do



For once, I agree with you. This is not over. We still don't know what really happened and a retest of $400 is possible. I'm hungover and I had to sell most of the BTC I drunk bought last night with my house payment money. Not nearly enough profit to sustain me until the recovery. I think I have a motorcycle to sell.



655. Post 5364882 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on February 25, 2014, 03:36:46 PM
Even IF bottom was reached, there is still a lot of work to do

img

For once, I agree with you. This is not over. We still don't know what really happened and a retest of $400 is possible. I'm hungover and I had to sell most of the BTC I drunk bought last night with my house payment money. Not nearly enough profit to sustain me until the recovery. I think I have a motorcycle to sell.

There isn't enough fiat on Stamp to keep us above $500 for long. Also, don't expect floods of new money until the current negative news cycle is over.

Money is flooding into Coinbase and will transfer to stamp, but I wouldn't expect this to continue indefinitely.



656. Post 5368806 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

If it's not a major player or group of players in the tech/finance spaces buying out Gox, then it will not survive. Gox needs to reorganize, recapitalize and rebrand.  Someone like Peter Thiel of PayPal worth billions. Ironically, They would need to keep Coffee Boy on the payroll for quite a while to aid with the transition. That clown didn't give a shit when it was his own money on the line, so he'll probably be even worse as an employee.

No news is bad news here and I think it's safe to assume the worst. Nobody is coming to the rescue. That way the only surprises are pleasant ones. Really hope I'm wrong, but there are only a handful of people who could pull it off and I doubt any of them want to. MtGox may very well be liquidated and claimants will get pennies on the dollar.



657. Post 5369314 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: traderCJ on February 25, 2014, 06:46:37 PM
If it's not a major player or group of players in the tech/finance spaces buying out Gox, then it will not survive. Gox needs to reorganize, recapitalize and rebrand.  Someone like Peter Thiel of PayPal worth billions. Ironically, They would need to keep Coffee Boy on the payroll for quite a while to aid with the transition. That clown didn't give a shit when it was his own money on the line, so he'll probably be even worse as an employee.

No news is bad news here and I think it's safe to assume the worst. Nobody is coming to the rescue. That way the only surprises are pleasant ones. Really hope I'm wrong, but there are only a handful of people who could pull it off and I doubt any of them want to. MtGox may very well be liquidated and claimants will get pennies on the dollar.

Incorrect.  Absolutely, flat out incorrect.  Gox won't require a "big name" to survive.  It's survived this long with a world class jack off at the helm.  All of these exchange owners were no names until Bitcoin became popular.  We don't know exactly how much debt Gox owes, but it's likely that the debt could be paid off in a year or two from exchange fees.

Gox has lost credibility. Lost coins and money are one thing. Lost credibility can only be restored by credible management. No bank will work with them otherwise. You can't just throw money at this problem. Gox had money. They lost it. It's unlikely but possible a new CEO could turn the company around with massive transparency, but who wants to operate like that? Who does operate like that?



658. Post 5370605 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 25, 2014, 07:55:48 PM
Everything I see makes me believe that Gox will never recover and that the funds are most likely lost.
Seems pretty bad..

On a good note he apparently worked *with* competitor Coinbase on security/funds review (audit?) measures recently.

What is most concerning to me is that even after all that's happened, MK still has not admitted he has done a single thing wrong. If that is the sort of personality at the center of this mess, then how could someone help him even if they wanted to? He still is apparently trying to manage this situation, which cannot possibly lead to a successful resolution for his customers or the greater community. If Mark is still in charge, that's terribly. If no one is in charge, that's almost as bad. Who's in charge at Gox right now? Is there a single person on the planet who is both capable and willing to take over? If so, who? If not, how can any conclusion be drawn except that all is lost?

How is it possible in the information age for so many with so much on the line to be kept in the dark like this?

My buy orders are at $450 and below until we get some decent intel.



659. Post 5370906 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Holliday on February 25, 2014, 08:16:46 PM
What is most concerning to me is that even after all that's happened, MK still has not admitted he has done a single thing wrong. If that is the sort of personality at the center of this mess, then how could someone help him even if they wanted to?

Sociopath.

Quite possibly. I am not at all optimistic that whatever negotiations are happening are going well. It's like Mark got caught in a pre-flop bluff and is doubling down on the flop, the turn and the river- PLAYING WITH HIS CUSTOMER'S FUNDS! He shouldn't be negotiating at all. He should be groveling at the foot of whoever can save the people who trusted him. If he doesn't, he'll go to jail or get murdered.

There's worse things in life than being a loser, Mark. I'm afraid you are about to find out what those things are.



660. Post 5371459 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Holliday on February 25, 2014, 08:36:04 PM
What is most concerning to me is that even after all that's happened, MK still has not admitted he has done a single thing wrong. If that is the sort of personality at the center of this mess, then how could someone help him even if they wanted to?

Sociopath.

Quite possibly. I am not at all optimistic that whatever negotiations are happening are going well. It's like Mark got caught in a pre-flop bluff and is doubling down on the flop, the turn and the river- PLAYING WITH HIS CUSTOMER'S FUNDS! He shouldn't be negotiating at all. He should be groveling at the foot of whoever can save the people who trusted him. If he doesn't, he'll go to jail or get murdered.

There's worse things in life than being a loser, Mark. I'm afraid you are about to find out what those things are.

With the general lack of communication and the phrasing of what little communication does come, he has to be a sociopath. He simply refuses to take any blame what-so-ever when Gox is the only entity that can be blamed for Gox's multiple failures. I haven't seen a shred of empathy for his customers either.

He seems to make the worst possible choices at every turn. Randomly deleting the twitter account and website. WTF?

If Gox was tasked with destroying Bitcoin, we would be at $75,000 per coin right now.

The worst part is the threads of hope he is dangling for his victims. "litecoin", "a turning point", etc. Give these poor bastards some fucking closure. I just want him gone. I hope Gox survives without him, but if he's still running the show, I want it to burn to the ground.




661. Post 5371739 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Undone on February 25, 2014, 09:07:06 PM
I'm 99% certain the Facebook gox.com page is a fake.

For a start, why not put it all on the gox.com or mtgox.com websites?


I also really love the misspelling of "exaggerated."

Yeah, that typo really stands out. What would be really terrifying to me is if this ISN'T a fake. A new Gox with notices like that would be like a bad rash returning.



662. Post 5373220 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

BOOM! got out just in time.



663. Post 5373369 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: TERA on February 25, 2014, 10:41:54 PM
Am I the only one who thinks that if Gox does come out alive and pay out, that this would be the best thing to happen for Bitcoin? The news would be unbelievably positive.

Its death.. well, its terrible already. It will only get worse if they wont pay out.
I'm personally much more bullish if gox dies and stamp price continues to go up. It means the worst has happened yet stamp continues to be bullish despite that and it's able to support the price on it its own.  If I find that there is a rally due to something at gox then it is like a false rally and the neverending drama with gox continues.

Gox alive with Karpeles at the helm is not acceptable. That would be a boat anchor dragging down Bitcoin for as long as the situation continues. 



664. Post 5373446 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: magicmexican on February 25, 2014, 10:44:52 PM
http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2014/02/25/mt-gox-ceo-says-on-internet-chat-hasnt-given-up/

Fuck. “Giving up,” says Karpeles, “is not a part of how I usually do things.”  That's your problem, Mark. Got to know when to hold 'em. Know when to fold 'em.

The guy's herpes. Just keeps coming back.



665. Post 5373811 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: frank754 on February 25, 2014, 11:01:15 PM
So is the consensus now that the bottom is reached and it will only go up? Would you trade in all your other altcoins for BTC right now (while BTC is cheap) or hold them?

I hope so, but what has changed? gox if offline and trading is halted, but MK is still there to continue the upfuckery and nobody can get coins or fiat out. Nobody knows shit. Can't believe I'm saying this, but bitcoin is overpriced given what we know.



666. Post 5373963 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: porcupine87 on February 25, 2014, 11:17:40 PM
What are the odds that we stay over 500 the next 24h?

Pretty good unless there's a goxxing from beyond the grave.
This is exactly what happening now. Mark in the IRC channel still claiming everything is ok. It's like an undead zombie you can't kill.

But what news from Mark could be make things worse? The think with the 750 000 lost btc over the years?

ANY news from Mark other than "someone else is taking over" is bad news. It means he's still poisoning the pond. He seems to be incapable of learning.



667. Post 5374072 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Dragonkiller on February 25, 2014, 11:26:30 PM
What are the odds that we stay over 500 the next 24h?

Pretty good unless there's a goxxing from beyond the grave.
This is exactly what happening now. Mark in the IRC channel still claiming everything is ok. It's like an undead zombie you can't kill.

But what news from Mark could be make things worse? The think with the 750 000 lost btc over the years?

ANY news from Mark other than "someone else is taking over" is bad news. It means he's still poisoning the pond. He seems to be incapable of learning.

well he just confirmed the report is more or less true

All the more reason for him to step down. He's a disease. a plague. a todler flying a full 747 thinking it's a video game.



668. Post 5375015 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: TERA on February 25, 2014, 11:56:07 PM
Mark Karpeles is, without doubt, the worst thing to have ever happened to Bitcoin.
I wonder how bitcoin adoption and price would have moved along if it wasn't for Mark and Gox (and there was a competent exchange instead). Do you think maybe the log trendline would perhaps be different and maybe twice as steep?

It would have been better if he had been just a little more incompetent because then he would have gone out of business years ago. The problem is that he is as crappy as possible without being too crappy to survive.  And because traders need volume, no other exchanges could develop the critical mass  to compete. So maybe he slowed adoption be half. We'll never know, but what I do know is we can't have the equivalent of the Silk Road ramp if he's still stinking up the place.

Mark Karpeles is the Gilligan of Bitcoin Island.



669. Post 5375244 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Dragonkiller on February 26, 2014, 12:44:35 AM
Can confirm cat is Mark's cat and thus conversation is not fake:

http://i.imgur.com/GqZr3N5.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgWb-tk5aek#t=14

CONFIRMED!


The cat's name is Tibane. He named the fuckin parent company after his cat!



670. Post 5375373 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: proudhon on February 26, 2014, 12:59:30 AM
I've got a feeling the market behavior to the MtGox failure will be like the reaction to the Silk Road closure.

DPR went to jail. His site was permanently shuttered. MK is still polluting the market with uncertainty.



671. Post 5375784 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: TERA on February 26, 2014, 01:10:06 AM
Am I the only one who thinks the 4 hour chart looks grossly overbought? where is the retracement? It's risen 40% now and no retracement.

No. I just sold at $582 on CB. Now I can pay my light bill. (whew)



672. Post 5376256 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on February 26, 2014, 01:55:36 AM
¹) This is how I imagine their wallet worked (and how it fucked up):

User initiates withdrawal:

* debit amount from user account
* generate new private key for change address and create tx
* store tx in database (indexed by txid)
* store private key in database (indexed by address, foreign_key=txid)
* push tx to network

a week later (cron job)

* for all unconfirmed tx older than 1 week:
*     credit BTC back to customer account
*     delete "invalid" tx
*         -> cascaded delete "unused" change address and its private key (ouch!)

run 2 years until wallet is dry, all supposed UTXO turn out to be STXO and all real UTXO are in nirvana already.
That scenario would be seriously bullish long term

Yes, if current prices do not reflect the true scarcity of coins in circulation. But we don't know for sure that's what really happened.




673. Post 5376444 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

So this rally is about the removal of fear of coins from Gox being dumped on other exchanges anytime soon if ever. Makes sense.

So how can Roger Ver and Andreas Antonopolis both be Bitcoin Jesus? Bitcoin Jesi?



674. Post 5376572 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on February 26, 2014, 02:10:05 AM
There isn't enough fiat on Stamp to sustain this rally. The order book only shows about 13 mill right now. Sure there is some off book too. But not likely near what Gox had before the malleability issue. I remember ~40 mill on book. I bet 2-3x of that off book.

You said that at $515 too.



675. Post 5376885 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Feels good to be only 100% BTC again. Being levered long was a little stressful.



676. Post 5377174 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

I guess I'm a little slow letting the news sink in. If 744K coins are really missing, nobody is going to bail out Gox. it's just too much money and the coins would have to be purchased elsewhere, driving up the price further. MK is delusional in thinking he can fix this. Nobody will make his victims whole. The coins are likely unrecoverable and the reason he has been so obtuse is because the magnitude of his failure is overwhelming. I feel sorry for him now. There is no possible redemption. No apology will suffice, and the cops are coming. The statement of remorse I was looking for will come at the sentencing hearing.

The missing coins have likely already been spent into circulation or have disappeared forever along with their private keys. Wow.



so why is bitcoinwisdom showing price movement on Gox?




677. Post 5377398 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: solex on February 26, 2014, 03:35:57 AM
I guess I'm a little slow letting the news sink in. If 744K coins are really missing, nobody is going to bail out Gox. it's just too much money and the coins would have to be purchased elsewhere, driving up the price further. MK is delusional in thinking he can fix this. Nobody will make his victims whole. The coins are likely unrecoverable and the reason he has been so obtuse is because the magnitude of his failure is overwhelming. I feel sorry for him now. There is no possible redemption. No apology will suffice, and the cops are coming. The statement of remorse I was looking for will come at the sentencing hearing.

The missing coins have likely already been spent into circulation or have disappeared forever along with their private keys. Wow.

so why is bitcoinwisdom showing price movement on Gox?


Yes. The Prof is right. There is a possibility that 744k bitcoins have been destroyed by MtGox if the private keys have been overwritten in its database. Does anyone know whether gox ever implemented HD wallets internally?

No, we don't know yet, but the two most likely scenarios are that they were destroyed or that Gox was being hollowed out for months if not years. When I think that the coins I pulled out at a mere 15% premium were possibly among the last ones there, I shudder. If Gox was hollowed out, that hack is now the biggest cyber-heist in history. If the coins were destroyed, it's a Goldfinger crime-destroying a large deposit to make the destroyer's holdings more valuable.






678. Post 5377544 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 26, 2014, 03:48:37 AM
http://unsubject.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/jokerburnsmoney.jpg
Karpeles' master plan ... burn all the coinz!?

Karpeles isn't the Joker. He's a kid we left tending the garden when all the flowers died.



679. Post 5377635 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 26, 2014, 03:44:04 AM
Satoshi could bail out Gox.

no he couldn't ... not after putting an anti-bailout message in the genesis block, that would ruin bitcoin to its core.

I have to agree. There's moral hazard in a bail-out. We wanted money without central banking and we have it. Time to grow up.



680. Post 5377976 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 26, 2014, 04:27:41 AM
hmm is there any posts from virtex saying why?

https://twitter.com/cavirtex

something about a problem when they enabled LTC trading...

if you can find an explicit reason there, please share it.  I can't see the post history (probably 'cuz I'm blocking the scripts), but I'm not a twitter guy so I'm not sure how that stuff works.

Sounds a little fishy. They're having trouble with their trading engine but that shouldn't affect withdrawals.



681. Post 5378035 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Stamp's back up to $570.



682. Post 5378067 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on February 26, 2014, 04:38:53 AM
Look at all this fresh fiat money on Bitstamp. And look at this lack of coins.

$593 @ CB- Yanks still buying



683. Post 5378818 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

new daily high on stamp.



684. Post 5379062 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: creekbore on February 26, 2014, 06:09:08 AM
If the price keeps rising much more that (possible) V formation will be toast

I'm expecting the daily news cycle will kick in around 4 hours hence and the news of the Gox subpoenas will send us back down for a while.

The market is saying Gox closure is bullish. Think Silk Road.



685. Post 5379102 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: lumierre on February 26, 2014, 06:13:47 AM
I have a good feeling we've reached the bottom due to the volume. The 380-400 resistance held and the market rejected the downtrend when it got to that point indicated by the volume. The market has already considered mtgox bankrupt. If ever, mtgox comes back, it'll be an added bonus to drive the price up. I'd buy on dips right now.

Gox ain't coming back. You don't recover from losing 744 thousand bitcoins.



686. Post 5379146 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: isov on February 26, 2014, 06:20:13 AM
Every indicator and just the overall feeling of all this truly feels like something is different today. Feels really good atm that we might have some brighter days coming gentlemen  Wink

Moving average after moving average, the upward momentum is still building. $594!  no end in sight to this rally.



687. Post 5387075 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

It took me a long time to understand the Gox situation, so I am not surprised to see people here in the same stages I have gone through. You have to understand who Mark Karpeles is. Look at his cat videos. This is a man selling a dead parrot. There is no credible buy-out in the making. There are no coins at Gox. He is still in denial, trying to restart the engines on the Titanic after all the lifeboats have launched. The coins are gone. forever. The magnitude of the loss is hard to fathom, but when it does sink in, the realization of how precious and rare bitcoins are starts to become clear.

Denial is a powerful psychological force.  Some things are too awful to contemplate. But who is in denial here, bulls or bears? critics or boosters? This Gox thing has shaken me to the core. We should all question our assumptions. Bears, I don't disrespect you. I just disagree. Bitcoin exhibits anti-fragile characteristics and just experienced a major stress shock and got much much stronger as a result.




688. Post 5387646 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

What most of you seem to not understand is that one of the biggest results of this Gox fiasco is that many many coins are going into encrypted jump drives and paper wallets. They are not Beany Babies. They are Faberge eggs. There are going to get scarce. Really scarce.

I'm pulling most of my holdings off the exchanges. I should have done it long ago. You can figure out for yourself what this will do to the price.



689. Post 5388624 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 26, 2014, 04:51:06 PM
I also don't buy the liquidated them to play with the cash story. No one who believes in bitcoin (which he clearly did / does) would do that,  they all feel that the price is way under valued and its a life changing tech. Hence why he acquired so many coins and then wanted his own exchange. Why would he then bet against the price going up?

Also back at $100 there wasn't anywhere near the liquidity to sell all of those coins.

That is just a theory, of course (I still think that it is more likely than the stupid malleability hack.  Both theories depend on sheer stupidity, but mine also has a greed motive. Wink

Frrom the charts, I see that there were long periods when the price was stable.  Perhaps MtGOX expected the price to remain stable for another couple of months, or that it would rise slowly so that they would have time to reverse the deal.

In my theory, the sale would probably have happened off-market, in large lots.  Suppose that a big investor contacted MtGOX and offered to buy 1,000,000 BTC from their cold storage at 15$ each, when the market price was 10$.  Would they let that opportunity pass?

There seems to be a lot of psychological projection in your attribution of motives, Jorge. I'm sure there is in my case also, but it reveals something about you.



690. Post 5393558 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: solex on February 26, 2014, 08:59:29 PM
stamp freaking out over senator news? Cheesy

A senator that doesn't even know the difference between "weary" and "wary". Says it all.

People who don't understand how the American political process really works (including most Americans) don't know how laughable this is. The Senator from J.P. Morgan would have to expend a massive amount of political capital to pass a ban, and would get no more benefit from it than the Senator from BankAmerica or the Senator from Goldman Sachs. Politics is about concentrating benefits and distributing costs. This would achieve the opposite in terms of political capital. It won't happen. Bitcoin won't get banned until after it's too big to stop, and maybe not then.

The regulators and central bankers know who's behind this and they know why. They may have to give lip service to the shopworn concerns presented, but thy have concerns of their own and they have much bigger problems to deal with. Support for an unenforceable Bitcoin ban is simply a bargaining chip created for the purpose of trading it away for something more politically valuable.



691. Post 5394183 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 26, 2014, 09:43:51 PM

US$ is a cult, gold money is a cult ... all money is a cult, and a bubble too.

In religion, the only difference between a legit faith and a cult is time. Christianity was once a cult. Islam was as well. Most recently Mormonism became legit roughly around the same time Mitt Romney got the Republican presidential nomination. A cult is a small community that typically grows exponentially and is centered around an unconventional premise. In this respect, the Bitcoin community resembles a cult, but how do unconventional premises become conventional? It's a nothing slur. A hollow pejorative. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum






692. Post 5395134 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: mmitech on February 26, 2014, 10:11:25 PM
http://letstalkbitcoin.com/somethings-not-right-at-gox/#.Uw5lrfmwJBl

It's not hard to imagine the most likely scenario. At some point, Mark lost some coins. They were either stolen or lost through bad coding/accounting. He told nobody about it and thought he could either get them back or make up for the missing coins in some other way. Some attempts to recover or replace them we're partially successful and other attempts made the problem even worse. As the situation got more desperate, Mark resorted to greater and greater violations of ethical behavior until he could no longer even operate as a fractional reserve due to cash flow completely drying up.

It is very likely that the vast majority of depositors funds are gone forever, and not just the crypto. The willybot could have very plausibly been Mark buying goxBTC at ABOVE market rates just to keep the exchange operating and BTC withdrawals functioning until a miracle occurred and the lost coins were recovered, or until a new source of revenue could be found to sustain operations and keep the charade going.  Mark's failure to own up to his mistakes turned a substantial but survivable problem into a colossal life-destroying disaster for him and many of his customers. Despite this, he is STILL not owning up even though nobody but the most deluded wishful thinkers believe their is any hope of recovery. At first he didn't ask for help out of pride or embarrassment, but now he must subconsciously know that there is no way out. Denial is all he has left. In this context, his behavior makes sense. It is the only context in which his behavior makes sense.

There is no coming back for Gox. The damage is catastrophic. The point of no return happened months ago if not years.



693. Post 5395473 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: TERA on February 26, 2014, 11:20:05 PM
I need some advice from Sun Tzu.

He who is prudent and lies in wait for an enemy who is not, will be victorious.



694. Post 5396155 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: mmitech on February 26, 2014, 11:12:02 PM

It's not hard to imagine the most likely scenario. At some point, Mark lost some coins. They were either stolen or lost through bad coding/accounting. He told nobody about it and thought he could either get them back or make up for the missing coins in some other way. Some attempts to recover or replace them we're partially successful and other attempts made the problem even worse. As the situation got more desperate, Mark resorted to greater and greater violations of ethical behavior until he could no longer even operate as a fractional reserve due to cash flow completely drying up.

It is very likely that the vast majority of depositors funds are gone forever, and not just the crypto. The willybot could have very plausibly been Mark buying goxBTC at ABOVE market rates just to keep the exchange operating and BTC withdrawals functioning until a miracle occurred and the lost coins were recovered, or until a new source of revenue could be found to sustain operations and keep the charade going.  Mark's failure to own up to his mistakes turned a substantial but survivable problem into a colossal life-destroying disaster for him and many of his customers. Despite this, he is STILL not owning up even though nobody but the most deluded wishful thinkers believe their is any hope of recovery. At first he didn't ask for help out of pride or embarrassment, but now he must subconsciously know that there is no way out. Denial is all he has left. In this context, his behavior makes sense. It is the only context in which his behavior makes sense.

There is no coming back for Gox. The damage is catastrophic. The point of no return happened months ago if not years.

we don't wish for gox to come back, we wish for funds to be recovered, it is a really bad advertisement for Bitcoin at this point, all the progress will be crushed with this, regulators will want to hit hard anyways... and some people lost life changing amount of funds.

No, I didn't lose any funds in gox BS, but I feel for those who did and I wish for this to be fixed.

Those funds are no more. They have has ceased to be. They have expired and gone to meet Satoshi. They are late funds. They are vapor. Bereft of existence, they rest in peace. If Karpeles hadn't left them on the balance sheet, they would've been written off ages ago. They've rung down the curtain and joined the choir invisible. They are ex-funds.



695. Post 5397518 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

See there is no "rescue" because the rescuers wanted access to cheap coins or easy profits. One look at the books told them there were no profits or coins and they bailed. That "crises report" reeked of amateurish under-capitalized opportunism. It was so unprofessional that I thought it was fake.



696. Post 5398075 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 27, 2014, 02:32:40 AM
Those funds are no more. They have has ceased to be. They have expired and gone to meet Satoshi. They are late funds. They are vapor. Bereft of existence, they rest in peace. If Karpeles hadn't left them on the balance sheet, they would've been written off ages ago. They've rung down the curtain and joined the choir invisible. They are ex-funds.
They are not gone, just pining for the blockchain...
Beautiful funds, those bitcoins.


This whole matter is far from being concluded... there is a lot of sorting that still NEEDS to be done.  I am sure that we DO NOT know the half of the financial situation of Mt. Gox and the extent to which it may be feasible to either reopen or to reimburse customers.... these details are going to be worked out in the coming weeks.. and maybe months.

Dude, Gox was run into the ground. It was hollowed out completely. Karpeles didn't stop burning money until there was no more left to burn. It may take time to know the details or we may never know the details, but that doesn't change the relevant fact that Gox was bled dry. Denial is one of the stages of grief so it's ok, but acceptance is the last. See you there.



697. Post 5398168 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: delphic on February 27, 2014, 03:02:27 AM
If the Bitstamp market could make a sound, it would probably sound like a balloon slowly deflating.
Not sure why. I would have thought that if the reaction is to twobitidiot's latest news, the implication is that the MtGox coins are gone, which would tend to be bullish for BTC.

I guess the market was expecting more than just an implication. To me, it's as clear as day, but people interpret things differently.



698. Post 5398372 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

This is funny. Half the traders are expecting a crash and half are expecting a rocket ride so of course we're going sideways. But fiat is piling up on Stamp and it's only a matter of time before somebody blinks. 



699. Post 5398532 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

The bull case is being shouted down, but not by quality arguments. Look at the chart. I'd like to get a TA analysis by someone like TERA or another respected chartist. It looks ready to break out to the upside to me.



700. Post 5398806 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on February 27, 2014, 03:59:36 AM
I know we are all happy that Gox is gone, but am I the only one really in awe at what happened?

Im guessing when a lot of people predicted Gox' death it was by them losing market share and closing up shop... not by losing $400m USD of user money.. just crazy! All this time, we've been in awe at the incompetence and BS.. And this is the underlying reason. I almost feel bad for Karpeles. I'd have to see the final story, but in the version i'm imagining.. the guy is just dumb, not a criminal.

Then again, we dont have the fully story.. I'm just curious if anyone feels the same shock as I do that they really are.. finally, gone?

That depends on what you mean by "dumb". Karpeles made a mistake or a series of mistakes and compounded the damaged dramatically, catastrophically by trying to cover it up. He was smart enough to hide the hollowing out of a major exchange for months if not years. I'm in awe of the scope of his failure, the extent of the damage and the fact that he still is denying it, rearranging deck chairs on an empty sinking vessel. Yeah. I'm still in shock, and in 100% BTC. 



701. Post 5398903 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 27, 2014, 04:15:11 AM
Those funds are no more. They have has ceased to be. They have expired and gone to meet Satoshi. They are late funds. They are vapor. Bereft of existence, they rest in peace. If Karpeles hadn't left them on the balance sheet, they would've been written off ages ago. They've rung down the curtain and joined the choir invisible. They are ex-funds.
They are not gone, just pining for the blockchain...
Beautiful funds, those bitcoins.


This whole matter is far from being concluded... there is a lot of sorting that still NEEDS to be done.  I am sure that we DO NOT know the half of the financial situation of Mt. Gox and the extent to which it may be feasible to either reopen or to reimburse customers.... these details are going to be worked out in the coming weeks.. and maybe months.

Dude, Gox was run into the ground. It was hollowed out completely. Karpeles didn't stop burning money until there was no more left to burn. It may take time to know the details or we may never know the details, but that doesn't change the relevant fact that Gox was bled dry. Denial is one of the stages of grief so it's ok, but acceptance is the last. See you there.


Why do YOU want to argue... ?  You are speculating.. .and surely, I agree that there is a lot of inferential evidence pointing to bad conduct and/or fraud... however, it is far from certain, still.  I am NOT in denial... I have NO stake in the outcome... except for the fact that I am invested in BTC.>>> but in either event, I will ake my investment decision based on facts.. rather than what continues to appear to be ambiguous speculation.

It is also far from clear about the extent of the fall out... ONCE that is made a little more clear, we will have a further market reaction (yes we already had some market reaction to this news).... and surely, the markets are going to begin to react.. far from any point of my knowing.. b/c there also seems to be quite a bit of insider trading going on in this BTC market..... ...

If BTC is NOT going to survive, then I am going to pull my investment; however, I tend to believe that the signs for the health of BTC, overall are positive.  So, in that regard, I conclude that I do NOT have enough evidence to be in denial.. and you do not have enough either... hehehehehe  Smiley

Good, anger- that's the next stage. You're making progress.



702. Post 5399160 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Where's all the TA chartists tonight? isn't this a pennant formation? http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:chart_analysis:chart_patterns:flag_pennant_continu

Second Market exchange is going to be huge.



703. Post 5399282 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 27, 2014, 04:35:14 AM
The bull case is being shouted down, but not by quality arguments. Look at the chart. I'd like to get a TA analysis by someone like TERA or another respected chartist. It looks ready to break out to the upside to me.



We CANNOT go upside with all this GOX uncertainty still looming in the public eye... even if some people here believe that the evidence is unambiguously clear.  The public information remains far from clear... at this point... so I predict the top that we can get would be below $700... absent some resolution regarding the GOX situation.

Newbie, it's the bears that are uncertain. That's why they will blink first. The bulls have all the information they need.



704. Post 5399355 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 27, 2014, 04:43:27 AM

NOW you are engaging in attacking the person and making labels rather than talking substance...   Maybe you are just arguing for the sake of it b/c you have made NO point, yet.. except to make attempts at criticizing me in some kind of aloof way... what is your point, exactly?  You are acting as if you has some high and mighty inside knowledge or what?    If so, give me your sources.

*sigh* I have in insight into human nature that others with the same insight recognize and others don't. Mark's behavior is only fathomable given one scenario, the one I outlined in multiple previous posts. I also have enough insight to predict that you find my evidence an reason insufficient and will continue to do so until the whole story comes out, but by then BTC will be several hundred dollars higher than now.

I know that sounds arrogant and condescending. I'm sorry. I'm not known to play well with others.



705. Post 5399530 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 27, 2014, 05:03:25 AM
Did you buy 1 bitcoin yet? That would make for some excitement Smiley

No.  And I must confess to something much worse than pontificating on bitcoin without ever having used it:

        I have served jury duty five times, all murder cases, without having murdered anyone before.

So, before I buy some bitcoin, I must fill that gap in my experience, in case I am again called to serve.  Would you volunteer?

Academic trolls are called "sophists", correct? You already admitted to me that you cannot be convinced. I shouldn't bother trying, remember? That is not academic skepticsm which is intellectually healthy. That's psudointellectualism and prolly a little evil thrown in. The discomforting cognitive dissonance due to you presence here is known to you and felt by us. I don't like you. Perhaps that's the effect you wish to have.



706. Post 5399711 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 27, 2014, 05:26:51 AM
You're going to hate yourself when you read back your posts here in year or two. Oh boy..  Grin

Perhaps. But right now I am kinda ejoying it.  I did't have so much attention focused on my person since sixth grade, when I was the #1 target of all bullies in the school.  It makes me feel thirteen again. Cheesy

Of course you were treated with hostility. You are an attention whore. I have no doubt you provoke bullies so that you can plead victim. I have enough of your personality flaws to recognize them in you. That really concerns me.



707. Post 5399831 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: CoinDox on February 27, 2014, 05:44:03 AM
http://www.scribd.com/doc/209535200/Business-Plan-MtGox-2014-2017

*edit Bah you ^ beat me to it!

They've got him on fraud now.



708. Post 5399900 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: kkaspar on February 27, 2014, 05:48:56 AM
Define irony:
You are an attention whore.

I'm an actual Bitcoin trader and enthusiast on a Bitcoin forum, whatever my faults may be.

What the hell has happened to the momentum chasers and TA chartists? On the way down, they would not shut up and now they are conspicuously quiet. This is the TA thread and there has been no TA for pages.



709. Post 5400028 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

"Flags and Pennants are short-term continuation patterns that mark a small consolidation before the previous move resumes. These patterns are usually preceded by a sharp advance or decline with heavy volume, and mark a mid-point of the move. "



hmmmmm.



710. Post 5400596 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: smashing on February 27, 2014, 06:41:28 AM

$2 million in profit in the current fiscal year? And all the hassle, risk and aggravation? Remind me never to go into the Bitcoin business.

That document is evidence of attempted fraud. Their profit was much higher than 2 million but Mark lost much much more. The majority of new capital was to cover for Karpeles' blunders.  Mark is not just out of business now. He's going to jail.



711. Post 5400720 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Peter R on February 27, 2014, 07:04:18 AM
If it will be concluded as a fact, that mtgox customers lost their money, then there will be a shitstorm that BTC has never seen before.
To me, it's rather amusing how people try to downplay the entire situation.


There will be a shitstorm indeed.  However, if investors who thought they held 750,000 BTC* in aggregate realize they now hold 0, this revealed scarcity may blow the price in the upwards direction as easily as negative sentiment may push the price down.  


*Assuming this is true, of course.


Coins that don't exist cannot be dumped on other exchanges.



712. Post 5400816 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: CoinDox on February 27, 2014, 07:21:14 AM
Coins that don't exist cannot be dumped on other exchanges.

Hey Billy, are you Stateless Man?

http://imgur.com/QVLlGdq

No.



713. Post 5401835 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

All we need now is some hapless bears to dump and start the bull shark feeding frenzy. Keep spreading FUD. The trap is set. Now all we need is bait.



714. Post 5402294 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: TERA on February 27, 2014, 08:54:11 AM
All we need now is some hapless bears to dump and start the bull shark feeding frenzy. Keep spreading FUD. The trap is set. Now all we need is bait.
Now I'm not being bearish here but I think it's almost a certainty that the current chart is overbought and that we need to retest some level around 500 to 'complete' the chart. Unfortunately, this might not happen until some bears come along and help it happen with FUD. At that point, when the FUD is driving it down and it's reached 500, the FUD might be so strong you might no longer think 'oh 500 the excellent buying opportunity I've been waiting for". You might instead think that it's going to 400 or even that 400 was not the bottom after all and that it's going to even lower levels. Then suddenly the price will rebound back to 600 and you'll be left with no coins, feeling like an idiot.

That's certainly possible, but there has been enough consolidation to potentially start the next rally from any point at any time. I wouldn't want to be full fiat when that happens.



715. Post 5402410 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Peter R on February 27, 2014, 09:01:42 AM
All we need now is some hapless bears to dump and start the bull shark feeding frenzy. Keep spreading FUD. The trap is set. Now all we need is bait.
Now I'm not being bearish here but I think it's almost a certainty that the current chart is overbought and that we need to retest some level around 500 to 'complete' the chart. Unfortunately, this might not happen until some bears come along and help it happen with FUD. At that point, when the FUD is driving it down and it's reached 500, the FUD might be so strong you might no longer think 'oh 500 the excellent buying opportunity I've been waiting for". You might instead think that it's going to 400 or even that 400 was not the bottom after all and that it's going to even lower levels. Then suddenly the price will rebound back to 600 and you'll be left with no coins, feeling like an idiot.

I've learned a lot from people like you, TERA.  I used to think that TA was voodoo science no better than a coin toss. Now I see how the price wave cycles drive the news/FUD as much as the news/FUD drives the price.  It's quite fascinating, really. 

+1.  Fundamental analysis works better for investing but TA works better for trading.



716. Post 5402507 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 27, 2014, 09:27:09 AM

That document is evidence of attempted fraud. Their profit was much higher than 2 million but Mark lost much much more. The majority of new capital was to cover for Karpeles' blunders.  Mark is not just out of business now. He's going to jail.

WE still do NOT know whether he did anything illegal.
 
[/quote

I'm not certain enough to vote to convict if I was on a jury or even enough to indict if I was on a grand jury, but I am certain enough to make investment decisions.



717. Post 5402613 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: CoinDox on February 27, 2014, 09:44:53 AM
Hey guys, I love to read all this, but BTC-E is on the move. Houbi is set to follow I think. Been waiting for like 8 hours for this to start moving again...

Someone just got a few bites of bear meat. ER, I mean Gox! Senator BitBan! SELL SELL SELL!



718. Post 5402716 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: elasticband on February 27, 2014, 09:50:07 AM
wow bitcoinbuilder looks crazy. 500+ btc @ 0.065  Roll Eyes

Market is pricing in 93.5% probability that GoxCoins are unrecoverable.



719. Post 5412558 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Has is begun to sink in to people yet that the significance of the Crises report and the Gox business plan is that Karpeles was spending an enormous amount of time and energy attempting to attract new capital and cash plows when he could have been spending that time attempting to recover private keys if that was possible?

The fact that he was trying to get new money instead of hiring tech experts and locking down his servers should be telling to anyone paying attention.  Mark himself considered attracting new new capital inflows a more viable option than recovery of lost coins. If Karpeles thought that with access to the information he has, why would we with almost no information think differently?




720. Post 5422847 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: seleme on February 28, 2014, 09:59:06 AM
Kolin Burges ‏@The_K_meister 2m

Karpeles in Tokyo says MtGox is bankrupt. 750,000 customer bitcoins stolen & 120,000 company bitcoins stolen. None left #mtgox #mtgoxprotest

So now I expect a flood of apologies from everyone who doubted it when I said they were gone...not.

Price spike second wave will occur after the denial dip that apparently already started.



721. Post 5423054 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: nakaone on February 28, 2014, 10:16:39 AM
I believe the most important news now is what happened to the 750k btc (+120k gox)

Did they confirm they were in fact stolen and when it happened?

it makes absolutely no sense that 750k coins are stolen

Of course Karpeles is going to say they were stolen. He can't very well say he just lost them. He blamed the core protocol. He blames everyone but himself. The relevant matter is that the coins are GONE, and they are not sitting in one big wallet waiting to be dumped.  supply and demand- price is going to go up.



722. Post 5423228 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: gizmoh on February 28, 2014, 10:27:50 AM
No more dumping ?

But can you see price picking up on this.
It maybe be a slow grind down, especially with weekend coming..

Yes. This is bullish. less coins means more $/BTC. Less uncertainty. Good new means buy the rumor sell the news. Bad news means sell the rumor buy the news.



723. Post 5423519 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on February 28, 2014, 10:42:21 AM
http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/videonews/fnn?a=20140228-00000938-fnn-bus_all

GOOGLE TRANSLATE IS FUNNY

Marc Karupuresu representative of Mount Ngoc vinegar said, "having fallen over the inconvenience, really sorry" he said.

hilarious!



724. Post 5423647 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: mmitech on February 28, 2014, 10:47:43 AM
Am i really the only one who is concerned that Bitcoin hasn't responded to ANY good news in MONTHS?
People dump every single time there is some bad news. Often it isn't even bad news but more like "i'm gonna panic sell in case it us bad news". We go lower and lower. Now we're at 570. There will be good news. Nobody will give a shit. They're all waiting for the next bad news so we can go lower again.
We would need to most amazing super positive news ever to stop this and i don't see this coming.

So give me one reason why we could go up again. I can't find any. I really can't.

Edit: how much longer will we be going down because of Gox. They are gone. Will it take us down for months to come? Can't people just get over it?

it is really simple, bitcoin went from 80 to 1240 in one month and a half, this also doesn't seem healthy, people seem to think about "take some profit while they can", the down trend will continue till we discover the next adoption wave and we will see what the market will decide a fair price is.

Dude, we went from $400 to ~$566 now %41 up. This is officially a bull market. I'm not saying we can't go down from here, but there is twice as much fiat defending the bottom now as there was when we hit it the first time. Check the order books.



725. Post 5423747 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: seldon on February 28, 2014, 11:02:14 AM
Do we know if they will hand him a tanto for seppuku now?

We can only hope. I never really understood that tradition until now.



726. Post 5424046 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: mmitech on February 28, 2014, 11:16:49 AM

Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/28/us-bitcoin-mtgox-bankruptcy-idUSBREA1R0FX20140228

Quote
(Reuters) - Mt. Gox, once the world's biggest bitcoin exchange, filed for bankruptcy protection on Friday, saying it may have lost all of its investors' virtual coins due to hacking into its faulty computer system.

Chief executive Mark Karpeles, bowing in contrition and wearing a suit instead of his customary T-shirt, apologized in Japanese at a news conference for the company's collapse, blaming "a weakness in our system."

Angry investors have been seeking answers for what happened to their holdings of cash and bitcoins, an unregulated crypto-currency, on the Tokyo-based exchange. The collapse of the company has shaken the virtual currency world.

Mt. Gox deleted its website on Tuesday after freezing withdrawals earlier this month in the wake of a series of technical difficulties.

The exchange had liquid liabilities of 6.5 billion yen ($63.67 million), dwarfing its total assets of 3.84 billion yen, the company said. It had 127,000 creditors in bankruptcy, just over 1,000 of whom are Japanese.

The company and Karpeles have said little in the days before the filing, which is similar to Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States, except that they were working with others to resolve their problems.

Karpeles told the news conference that Mt. Gox wanted to file a criminal complaint against what he said was a hacking attack, but had no specific means of doing so.

(Reporting by Yoshifumi Takemoto; Writing by William Mallard; Editing by Ian Geoghegan)

If Gox is 37.6 million dollars in the hole, Then they will be liquidated and not restructured. We still don't know how much of that is in BTC vs. fiat or other assets, but we should find out soon.



727. Post 5424241 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Somebody needs to dump because the choo choo train runs on bear blood. We have to test the support to build investor confidence. Someone needs to dump, but it sure as hell won't be me.



728. Post 5428810 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: mmitech on February 28, 2014, 04:11:21 PM
and now this   http://www.pfhub.com/vietnam-officially-bans-all-bitcoin-transactions-424/

Vietnam officially bans Bitcoin

The biggest mistake Americans ever made regarding Viet Nam was in thinking it was relevant.



729. Post 5429343 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: Grafzep on February 28, 2014, 04:41:29 PM
This is what a takeover looks like.

Real money wants in. Thanks, kids, for coming up with this here “Bitcoin” – we get it now. You’ve shown that it’s so robust and useful that even the incompetent and the illegal can take it to $10Bn. Now kindly leave and let us take it from here.

That letter from the Next Money Representative 5 left MK hanging out to dry. He thought they would help, but they just supplied a coup de grace. They want a clear-out and to bring in a legislative framework. They’re building acceptance, so the unacceptable need to go.

Short term, the media and banks will crucify the ecosystem. This will cover the smart money accumulation phase. Some here will hand over their coins in exchange for a car or a house. That’s fine, and it’s a shame others got burned, but there’s a handover going and a little turbulence is to be expected.

We’re heading out of beta.


^^this^^



730. Post 5429858 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Buying on stamp.




731. Post 5430363 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 28, 2014, 05:29:04 PM
remember that 10k whale on stamp jsut before gox went offline? things will get dirty sooner or later.

has he bought back in yet?


The amateurish way those coins were dumped suggest he didn't. Whoever got those BTC near $400 knew exactly what they were doing. I expect the 10K whale to get back in ABOVE his dump price.



732. Post 5430592 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: tailor on February 28, 2014, 05:47:32 PM

The amateurish way those coins were dumped suggest he didn't. Whoever got those BTC near $400 knew exactly what they were doing. I expect the 10K whale to get back in ABOVE his dump price.

Assuming it wasn't a dump of stolen coins.
The operators at Bitstamp know who the whale is. If it turns out they were stolen, he will have a lot of questions to answer. With Gox out of the way, stamp will fall under the microscope in the coming months. It will be interesting to see how they handle the limelight.



733. Post 5433200 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

A lot of speculators were expecting the price to go up immediately. When they realize that it won't, they will give up and sell...and that's when it will go up. Others were expecting price to tank today. The longer it holds up, the more their orders inch up closer to the current spot price. We're going down, but not nearly long enough or far enough for everyone to get on board before the next ramp.

Put your limit orders in and go do something else for a while.




734. Post 5434498 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: mmitech on February 28, 2014, 09:20:12 PM
there was +28K bids to 400 and now there is only 20K mmmm

scary. on a weekend this could get bad.



735. Post 5447962 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on March 01, 2014, 02:54:51 PM
Doesn't that go against the whole guilty until proven innocent thing?

People often joke that "America has the worst form of government on the planet except for all the others." It ain't perfect.

There's a "stop and frisk" law in New York now. Basically if you look suspicious they can just stop you and search your person. That seems incredibly un-American to me (an American) yet it exists, seemingly in direct contradiction to "innocent until proven guilty" and the search laws we already have on the books.

The 4th Amendment is supposed to protect us from unreasonable searches and seizures, but it's the government that determines what is unreasonable, so it's worthless. Banking isn't the only sector of society that needs to be decentralized.



736. Post 5449742 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: yrtrnc on March 01, 2014, 05:11:34 PM
People often joke that "America has the worst form of government on the planet except for all the others." It ain't perfect.

And it certainly isn't better than all the others.  It has strengths and weaknesses in comparison to other large nation-states, and those are a matter of taste.  There are small nation-states which have systems which are vastly preferable to the U.S. system, in my opinion, but they are generally special cases.  Iceland is not too bad.  Norway is fairly tolerable.  I could almost stand Scotland.  Singapore is rather decent.  Chile, quite nice.  Conceivably Paraguay.  But then I've not lived there long enough to see the worst aspects, to judge how deeply they disturb me.

We should get together and buy an island with bitcoins, call it Satoshi Island and have the currency as BTC of course, use the bitcoin protocol to vote trade etc.. and live happily ever after.

I hope you're joking. We should gather in one place so was could all be taken out with a single missile? You seem to have trouble grasping the concept of a why we'd want a distributed, decentralized system in the first place.



737. Post 5454422 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on March 01, 2014, 10:34:17 PM
We should get together and buy an island with bitcoins, call it Satoshi Island and have the currency as BTC of course, use the bitcoin protocol to vote trade etc.. and live happily ever after.

It would be nothing but endless Goxings. And as with any utopia, who would clean the toilets?

That's not the biggest problem. Banksters would launch a propaganda war calling Bitcoin Island a hive of gambling, prostitution, drugs and money laundering; then it would get invaded. The Seasteading Institute is even dumber. At least Islands can't be sunk. This is a DISTRIBUTED network. We can have a group hug at the conventions.



738. Post 5456760 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: TERA on March 02, 2014, 02:43:34 AM
There will be no rally until Stamp freezes USD withdrawals.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Where are you getting this information of a possible withdrawal freeze? Shit. *submits a withdrawal*

Troll joke. Gox withdrawal freeze drove up prices. That guy's a douche. Thot u knew.



739. Post 5457505 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: TERA on March 02, 2014, 02:40:16 AM
9376 volume on stamp ??

This is starting to remind of the 5 other times i thought the trend was breaking and I had to buy. The only difference is MACD is up now (slightly).

If you've only been trading Bitcoin since last June, then you've never been through a correction yet. I think you're a woman. You write like a woman, you trade like a woman. You're very smart and I respect your analysis, but it's almost certain you're going to miss the big turn because you are too risk averse. Yer gonna hate me for saying so, but there's a reason we call cowards pussies.



740. Post 5457827 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: ThatBitcoinGuy on March 02, 2014, 04:33:17 AM
Too late, Hairy...

What's that got to do with anything? If you and the rest of the white knight brigade would rather shine her on than tell her the truth, be my guest. If I was the one being a puss, I'd want to know. 



741. Post 5458820 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: TERA on March 02, 2014, 06:17:26 AM
9376 volume on stamp ??

This is starting to remind of the 5 other times i thought the trend was breaking and I had to buy. The only difference is MACD is up now (slightly).

If you've only been trading Bitcoin since last June, then you've never been through a correction yet. I think you're a woman. You write like a woman, you trade like a woman. You're very smart and I respect your analysis, but it's almost certain you're going to miss the big turn because you are too risk averse. Yer gonna hate me for saying so, but there's a reason we call cowards pussies.
Multiple incorrect things in here. I'll admit my minds is a little weak right now due to exhaustion, terrible sleeping patters, and other bad habits. This may account for some missed trades and emotionally charged posts that I would not have made otherwise.

So what about this "big turn". Do YOU know how to tell when it's happening? What signs are there? Is it happening now?

Don't apologize for your posts. I appreciate your candor and I enjoy them more than most. Unfortunately I can't tell you what the market will do. I have a the luxury of being in this game for more than ROI, so I don't have to worry about making mistakes as much. I also don't have to worry about missing the turn because I'm already in from way back. I buy when price falls and I sell when it rises. I take profits in fiat if I have bills to pay and in BTC the rest of the time.

I don't think you're going to really understand this market if you think of it as poker just with better odds. Bitcoins aren't poker chips. If you don't believe in what you're doing, you won't have fun and if you're not having fun then you won't do very well.




742. Post 5458943 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: TERA on March 02, 2014, 07:18:27 AM
9376 volume on stamp ??

This is starting to remind of the 5 other times i thought the trend was breaking and I had to buy. The only difference is MACD is up now (slightly).

If you've only been trading Bitcoin since last June, then you've never been through a correction yet. I think you're a woman. You write like a woman, you trade like a woman. You're very smart and I respect your analysis, but it's almost certain you're going to miss the big turn because you are too risk averse. Yer gonna hate me for saying so, but there's a reason we call cowards pussies.
Multiple incorrect things in here. I'll admit my minds is a little weak right now due to exhaustion, terrible sleeping patters, and other bad habits. This may account for some missed trades and emotionally charged posts that I would not have made otherwise.

So what about this "big turn". Do YOU know how to tell when it's happening? What signs are there? Is it happening now?

Don't apologize for your posts. I appreciate your candor and I enjoy them more than most. Unfortunately I can't tell you what the market will do. I have a the luxury of being in this game for more than ROI, so I don't have to worry about making mistakes as much. I also don't have to worry about missing the turn because I'm already in from way back. I buy when price falls and I sell when it rises. I take profits in fiat if I have bills to pay and in BTC the rest of the time.

I don't think you're going to really understand this market if you think of it as poker just with better odds. Bitcoins aren't poker chips. If you don't believe in what you're doing, you won't have fun and if you're not having fun then you won't do very well.
When I said "poker better odds" I was referring to the Chinese traders using high frequency trading bots on Huobi.

Why quibble? You don't get it. You don't understand why us "nutters" love this project. For you, it's an opportunity, but not a labor of love. You're looking for an edge. That's my edge. It's worked pretty well for me so far.



743. Post 5459477 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: TERA on March 02, 2014, 08:14:09 AM
Go away with your emotional buy and hold propoganda. I've heard it a million times and I'm not interested in the buy and hold strategy. If all I ever did was buy and hold I'd have 2% of what I have now. I'd have NOTHING.

You've made 50X your original buy-in? So about the same as everyone who's been holding for a year, right? Is it worth all the stress to marginally outperform the market? I mean, you don't seem to be enjoying it, judging from your posts.



744. Post 5459748 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: TERA on March 02, 2014, 08:52:00 AM
Go away with your emotional buy and hold propoganda. I've heard it a million times and I'm not interested in the buy and hold strategy. If all I ever did was buy and hold I'd have 2% of what I have now. I'd have NOTHING.

You've made 50X your original buy-in? So about the same as everyone who's been holding for a year, right? Is it worth all the stress to marginally outperform the market? I mean, you don't seem to be enjoying it, judging from your posts.
I'm not marginally outperforming the market. I'm outperforming it by 5,000%. You must have misinterpreted my post.

Let me get this straight. Bitcoin is up ~600% since you started trading, so you've made ~300X profit in fiat terms? Is that what you're claiming? That's difficult to believe considering some of the bad calls you've made.




745. Post 5463074 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: TERA on March 02, 2014, 09:21:32 AM
Go away with your emotional buy and hold propoganda. I've heard it a million times and I'm not interested in the buy and hold strategy. If all I ever did was buy and hold I'd have 2% of what I have now. I'd have NOTHING.

You've made 50X your original buy-in? So about the same as everyone who's been holding for a year, right? Is it worth all the stress to marginally outperform the market? I mean, you don't seem to be enjoying it, judging from your posts.
I'm not marginally outperforming the market. I'm outperforming it by 5,000%. You must have misinterpreted my post.

Let me get this straight. Bitcoin is up ~600% since you started trading, so you've made ~300X profit in fiat terms? Is that what you're claiming? That's difficult to believe considering some of the bad calls you've made.


That's correct.  And yes I've made bad calls. But most of my profit does not come from calling the major reversals in bear markets and bull markets correctly - it actually comes from daytrading during high volume high volatility times when money is flying all over the place and there are literally opportunities to make 1000% profit in a day, especially if you use leverage.  Now take someone who doesn't make 'bad calls' and take someone who only makes good calls (a god) - they might be up 1,000,000% by now in the same time that I took to make 30,000%.

That's simply not a credible claim. There's only two ways you can generate returns like that; you can either gamble recklessly and get lucky or you have an edge so great that it amounts to cheating.



746. Post 5464312 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on March 02, 2014, 03:22:26 PM
boy this feels slow and painful.

Why? We may get another crack at some cheap coins. 



747. Post 5464774 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on March 02, 2014, 03:49:50 PM
Little reminder about SHTF situations: http://www.silverdoctors.com/one-year-in-hellsurviving-a-full-shtf-collapse-in-bosnia/

Interesting read.  The most valuable lesson to learn from that story is don't let yourself get trapped in a blockaded city in the first place.



748. Post 5465269 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Quote from: MickeyT2008 on March 02, 2014, 04:22:47 PM
How is the situation in Ukraine going to affect Bitcoin ? What if a new war in Europe starts ? Huh

I'm tense...

Gosh, didn't Europe have already enough wars.... one of my biggest fears is the war, but how will bitcoin help you in that situation ? when the infrastructure is destroyed no fiat neither Bitcoin is going to help you, we will eat grass if that happens.


 
The original design requirements the internet were for a decentralised communication system which can automatically reroute itself around areas of severe damage in the event of a nuclear war.  This means that both the internet and therefore bitcoin would survive a war in Europe.  I'm not going to speculate as to what that would do to its price, but it would survive

In war, fiat currencies rapidly become worthless. Credit evaporates first, then cash, then precious metals as the economy devolves into barter. Quality information becomes a matter of life and death. Bitcoin will be ideally situated to purchase intel and fund covert, rescue operations. Paying spies may prove to be the "killer" app. 



749. Post 5471192 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

good-sized dump on Stamp. a one-off or beginning of something interesting?



750. Post 5473906 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: zemario on March 03, 2014, 01:03:54 AM
Gee, so many bears pissed off. Don't bitch, and stop with the "pushing the price" non sense. If you do believe in manipulation theories, then sell before the wall is pulled?

It is kind of entertaining, people "know that it is manipulation", or get annoyed with one guys order. Quite frankly, if you have it all figured out, why don't you silently take advantage of it? Honest question.

The guy putting up the wall has his money where his mouth is. I suggest all you people theorizing about pump and dump manipulation dump your coins before him to show him.

Of course, you need to have the money AND the gut to do it.

LOL, they were so convinced we were going down that have don't have many coins to sell. They could borrow some, but that drives demand even further. This is what I meant by "missing the turn". Almost all TA indicators are lagging indicators.

I am NOT saying we are going up from here. I don't know. I actually expect a short term retest of ~$535 support, But if I am wrong, I'm glad that I have lots and lots of BTC to console me. How many bears can say the same?



751. Post 5474258 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: aminorex on March 03, 2014, 01:22:13 AM
Serious academics shouldn't make such statements

Keep in mind that Jorge is more than just an academic.  He's a counter-revolutionary.  Anything that does some kind of damage to Bitcoin is a straw of hope at which to snatch.  Anything to forfend a future in which your children are not slaves of the fiat system.

Is there just some general ignorance as to what "anti-fragile" means or is there some argument that I am not aware of that claims Bitcoin is not anti-fragile?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antifragile:_Things_That_Gain_from_Disorder




752. Post 5475077 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on March 03, 2014, 02:49:03 AM
If you guys don't stop picking on my person, I will have to take an extremely harsh punitive measure that you will not ever forget.  You have been warned.

More slumber posts?

ROTFL! I put Jorge on "ignore" because I like to think well of people and could no longer extend to him the benefit of the doubt. Now I want him to carry through with his threat because that would give me reason to respect him.

Give us your worst, you ivory-towered fraud. I'm pretty sure I deserve a come-comeuppance, but I highly doubt it's going to come from you.



753. Post 5475580 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: octaft on March 03, 2014, 03:29:49 AM
ROTFL! I put Jorge on "ignore" because I like to think well of people and could no longer extend to him the benefit of the doubt. Now I want him to carry through with his threat because that would give me reason to respect him.

Give us your worst, you ivory-towered fraud. I'm pretty sure I deserve a come-comeuppance, but I highly doubt it's going to come from you.

If you've only been trading Bitcoin since last June, then you've never been through a correction yet. I think you're a woman. You write like a woman, you trade like a woman. You're very smart and I respect your analysis, but it's almost certain you're going to miss the big turn because you are too risk averse. Yer gonna hate me for saying so, but there's a reason we call cowards pussies.

Nice thinking well of people there, eh? I'm sure he'll lose so much sleep being ignored by a misogynist asshole.

He's un-ignored now. The potential entertainment value is simply too great to pass up. Low volume scare-mongering is amusing, as if a drop from here will do anything except allow me to increase my holdings. I'm a mysogynist asshole with thick skin. Holding BTC for years has that effect.

TERA is claiming to have out-performed the market ~5,000%. Decide for yourself if that's a credible claim, but it puts me in the position of either calling out a false claim or learning something. Either way, I benefit.



754. Post 5475982 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: rabsie on March 03, 2014, 04:18:52 AM
real?

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1zem39/mtgox_restructuring_info_from_karpelez/

ok, ok I know this is completely baseless speculation, but as this is the speculation subforum...

If Gox replaces lost BTC by buying them on another exchange, this is uberbullish. Disclosure: trading on the assumption that this is even a real irc chat much less on the assumption that Karpeles is telling the truth is extremely risky.



755. Post 5476061 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on March 03, 2014, 04:31:22 AM

Correct

ok, ok I know this is completely baseless speculation, but as this is the speculation subforum...

If Gox replaces lost BTC by buying them on another exchange, this is uberbullish. Disclosure: trading on the assumption that this is even a real irc chat much less on the assumption that Karpeles is telling the truth is extremely risky.

Ignoring that we have no hint at that happening, it simply.. cant happen.

I would imagine they could only get all the bids (744k) filled at ~3000. There, enough people should flock in to take profits and fill Gox.

That is an astounding 2 billion dollars. #NotGonnaHappen

I'll grant you that it's mighty unlikely, but weirder things have happened. A messaging app was just bought up for 19 billion dollars by Facebook, for example.



756. Post 5476088 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 03, 2014, 04:32:40 AM
We are pumping on a fake paste bin... Must be time to short.

or an insider trading on asymmetric information. We won't know for sure until after the fact.



757. Post 5476247 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: octaft on March 03, 2014, 04:47:35 AM
He's un-ignored now. The potential entertainment value is simply too great to pass up. Low volume scare-mongering is amusing, as if a drop from here will do anything except allow me to increase my holdings. I'm a mysogynist asshole with thick skin. Holding BTC for years has that effect.

TERA is claiming to have out-performed the market ~5,000%. Decide for yourself if that's a credible claim, but it puts me in the position of either calling out a false claim or learning something. Either way, I benefit.

I don't care about TERA's claims, nor do I care about defending Jorge. I'm just pointing out that someone who considers "woman" an insult should not be acting so high and mighty.

I respect women for having feminine qualities. I respect men for having masculine qualities. How many top traders are women in the stock market? How many WSOP champions have been female? ever? none. World chess champions? none. Women generally have different skill sets. It's not insulting a car to say it's a shitty airplane. We are trading on incomplete information. I make assumptions based on generalities and they usually make me money. Take the moral high ground if you want, but I'd rather get paid.



758. Post 5476531 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: octaft on March 03, 2014, 05:14:52 AM
He's un-ignored now. The potential entertainment value is simply too great to pass up. Low volume scare-mongering is amusing, as if a drop from here will do anything except allow me to increase my holdings. I'm a mysogynist asshole with thick skin. Holding BTC for years has that effect.

TERA is claiming to have out-performed the market ~5,000%. Decide for yourself if that's a credible claim, but it puts me in the position of either calling out a false claim or learning something. Either way, I benefit.

I don't care about TERA's claims, nor do I care about defending Jorge. I'm just pointing out that someone who considers "woman" an insult should not be acting so high and mighty.

I respect women for having feminine qualities. I respect men for having masculine qualities. How many top traders are women in the stock market? How many WSOP champions have been female? ever? none. World chess champions? none. Women generally have different skill sets.

I could have a debate with you regarding society's contribution in excluding women from those fields (and the other way around regarding traditionally "feminine" things that men might enjoy) by forcing members of both sexes to adhere to their gender roles through shaming and judgment, i.e. men are good at math, women are good at sewing, etc., AKA exactly the dumb shit you are doing now.

Considering that debate would be an enormous waste of my time when done with a troglodyte such as yourself, however, I will instead say that there is no need to justify the fact that you're an awful human being. I was merely pointing it out.

Noted. You think it's more morally justifiable to force people to behave in ways you consider more socially beneficial? Just asking. Shaming and judgement have reduced the number of bastards (illegitimacy) for centuries and now we have an epidemic of unwed mothers. I let them service me, but their spawn usually end up in prison or on welfare. I blame nice guys like you. Funny how so many chicks also consider me an awful human being but still inexplicably desirable. 

$577.71!!   w00t!



759. Post 5476661 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on March 03, 2014, 05:36:30 AM

Correct

ok, ok I know this is completely baseless speculation, but as this is the speculation subforum...

If Gox replaces lost BTC by buying them on another exchange, this is uberbullish. Disclosure: trading on the assumption that this is even a real irc chat much less on the assumption that Karpeles is telling the truth is extremely risky.

Ignoring that we have no hint at that happening, it simply.. cant happen.

I would imagine they could only get all the bids (744k) filled at ~3000. There, enough people should flock in to take profits and fill Gox.

That is an astounding 2 billion dollars. #NotGonnaHappen

I'll grant you that it's mighty unlikely, but weirder things have happened. A messaging app was just bought up for 19 billion dollars by Facebook, for example.

Fair enough, but what is the incentive? Do you think Gox is capable of earning 2bn in fees within the next 10 years? Maybe?? But it would mean Bitcoin would have to grow, and Gox would have to become leader again.

I absolutely think 2 billion is fees is possible, and a Gox without Karpeles wouldn't be so bad, provided they gave us cryptographic proof of solvency and took other transparency measures. Doesn't mean it's probable though.



760. Post 5476708 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: octaft on March 03, 2014, 05:42:32 AM

Noted. You think it's more morally justifiable to force people to behave in ways you consider more socially beneficial? Just asking. Shaming and judgement have reduced the number of bastards (illegitimacy) for centuries and now we have an epidemic of unwed mothers. I let them service me, but their spawn usually end up in prison or on welfare. I blame nice guys like you. Funny how so many chicks also consider me an awful human being but still inexplicably desirable. 

Noted. You are arrogant and easily insulted, therefore must justify your inane beliefs to some random on the internet? Just asking.

If you want me to, I guess. Differing view points make conversation interesting. It would be so boring if we all agreed all the time.

It's a real wall. It's getting eaten! Might be some limey jazzed at not paying VAT tax. Cheerio, Guv!



761. Post 5479961 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: yrtrnc on March 03, 2014, 08:25:32 AM
Let's see what happens at 599 Wink

CCMF



762. Post 5480775 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

The Chinese move to the back of the bus where they belong.  All is right with the world.

I am so jacked. All I need now is a Ukranian woman and a can of spam!



763. Post 5481000 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: Rampion on March 03, 2014, 12:14:58 PM
We still going up or was that just a tease?

Semi NSFW
http://i.imgur.com/Eb0I1OL.gif

As this is the official off-topic thread I will take the occasion to say something I always wanted to: I'm really amazed by the NSFW thing US folks use when linking to sex related images.... is so ridiculous I cannot even understand it.

How does that work exactly? Naked ladies/porn is specifically considered "not suitable for work" but general news or other non-work related stuff is suitable? What about sports news? Bitcoin stuff? I mean, I'd say that everything non-work related might be considered "not suitable" in many circumstances (you are supposed to be working, not reading about sports or bitcoin, right?), but the fact of specifically labeling "naked ladies/sex" as "not suitable for work" seems to me the reflection of a ridiculously biggot society. Cheesy

We have to work with fat ugly women who threaten workplace harassment lawsuits because they feel inferior. They are backed up by the white knight beta boyz trying to get into their hideously overstretched pant suits. Puritans I can deal with. It's the feminutiness imported from Europe that metastasized here and morphed into this PC Orwellian crimethink nightmare that's so much fun to subvert ;-)



764. Post 5481212 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: mellowyellow on March 03, 2014, 12:33:36 PM
We still going up or was that just a tease?

Semi NSFW
http://i.imgur.com/Eb0I1OL.gif

As this is the official off-topic thread I will take the occasion to say something I always wanted to: I'm really amazed by the NSFW thing US folks use when linking to sex related images.... is so ridiculous I cannot even understand it.

How does that work exactly? Naked ladies/porn is specifically considered "not suitable for work" but general news or other non-work related stuff is suitable? What about sports news? Bitcoin stuff? I mean, I'd say that everything non-work related might be considered "not suitable" in many circumstances (you are supposed to be working, not reading about sports or bitcoin, right?), but the fact of specifically labeling "naked ladies/sex" as "not suitable for work" seems to me the reflection of a ridiculously biggot society. Cheesy

We have to work with fat ugly women who threaten workplace harassment lawsuits because they feel inferior. They are backed up by the white knight beta boyz trying to get into their hideously overstretched pant suits. Puritans I can deal with. It's the feminutiness imported from Europe that metastasized here and morphed into this PC Orwellian crimethink nightmare that's so much fun to subvert ;-)

You're not a very nice person are you? Do you ever intend to get married, have children? I hope you never have daughters.

Nice guys are losers. My daughter adores me. No, I don't plan on getting married again. Too many sluts and not enough time.



765. Post 5481406 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: yrtrnc on March 03, 2014, 12:49:24 PM
Is it time for cheap coins yet??

it is if you are Chinese.



766. Post 5481533 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: yrtrnc on March 03, 2014, 12:56:17 PM
Is it time for cheap coins yet??

you went off-topic, the topic now is TITS and if it is ok to look at them at work, otherwise at the moment Tits seems to be more important than the price, people are taking a break, which I think is ok Wink

Wouldnt mind sum cheap tits either!

"Money soon became worthless. We returned to an exchange. For a tin can of tushonka (think Soviet spam), you could have a woman. (It is hard to speak of it, but it is true.) Most of the women who sold themselves were desperate mothersbears."

http://www.silverdoctors.com/one-year-in-hellsurviving-a-full-shtf-collapse-in-bosnia/



767. Post 5481683 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: yrtrnc on March 03, 2014, 01:07:36 PM

Nice guys are losers. My daughter adores me. No, I don't plan on getting married again. Too many sluts and not enough time.

Sounds like the classic "I was 'nice' (read: a wimp) with my ex and she mistreated me, therefore I degrade all women and think they deserve to be mistreated, and anybody/man who disagrees gets the full brunt of my bitterness" trope.

Remember, your mother is a woman Wink

Close. I think rather well of housewives and chaste girls. It's just that there are so few of them. I even like trashy chicks until they start to lose their looks and conveniently get ex-slutty (at least in public). My mom prolly did me a disservice by being such a good example and setting the bar too high.



768. Post 5481827 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: yrtrnc on March 03, 2014, 01:10:10 PM
Is it time for cheap coins yet??

you went off-topic, the topic now is TITS and if it is ok to look at them at work, otherwise at the moment Tits seems to be more important than the price, people are taking a break, which I think is ok Wink

Wouldnt mind sum cheap tits either!

"Money soon became worthless. We returned to an exchange. For a tin can of tushonka (think Soviet spam), you could have a woman. (It is hard to speak of it, but it is true.) Most of the women who sold themselves were desperate mothersbears."

http://www.silverdoctors.com/one-year-in-hellsurviving-a-full-shtf-collapse-in-bosnia/

"6. Were gold and silver useful?
Yes. I personally traded all the gold in the house for ammunition."

Can we do this with BTC?

Even easier if you are trading internationally. It's hard to email gold. BTC is for the supplies you couldn't get locally.



769. Post 5481974 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: octaft on March 03, 2014, 01:26:37 PM


Close. I think rather well of housewives and chaste girls. It's just that there are so few of them. I even like trashy chicks until they start to lose their looks and conveniently get ex-slutty (at least in public). My mom prolly did me a disservice by being such a good example and setting the bar too high.

Are you hot for your mom or something? Geez, dude, your problems are worse than I could imagine. My mother was beautiful, but even thinking about her in comparison to women I am/have been sexually active with feels bizarre, to say the least.

Your mother is your primary female role model whether you chose to acknowledge that or not. Mom was a keeper, which explains why Dad kept her. My ex wasn't so I didn't. I don't hate women. It's just a fact that the ones available to me are unsuitable for long term commitment. I'm not crying about it. I enjoy the variety.



770. Post 5481999 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: yrtrnc on March 03, 2014, 01:38:59 PM
Is it time for cheap coins yet??

you went off-topic, the topic now is TITS and if it is ok to look at them at work, otherwise at the moment Tits seems to be more important than the price, people are taking a break, which I think is ok Wink

Wouldnt mind sum cheap tits either!

"Money soon became worthless. We returned to an exchange. For a tin can of tushonka (think Soviet spam), you could have a woman. (It is hard to speak of it, but it is true.) Most of the women who sold themselves were desperate mothersbears."

http://www.silverdoctors.com/one-year-in-hellsurviving-a-full-shtf-collapse-in-bosnia/

"6. Were gold and silver useful?
Yes. I personally traded all the gold in the house for ammunition."

Can we do this with BTC?

Even easier if you are trading internationally. It's hard to email gold. BTC is for the supplies you couldn't get locally.

Yes but if we were in the same situation as the people in Bosnia, then it would be a bit more difficult to send bitcoins.

Which is why said that the primary lesson from that story was to avoid such situations if possible.



771. Post 5482153 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on March 03, 2014, 01:30:20 PM
We live in a culture where it's considered normal to show people killing each other in the most gruesome ways imaginable on TV, but god forbid you show some people making love. What more needs to be said about this?
We have an overpopulation problem.

continuing the OT for fun, I think that if the world population continues growing so fast, then buying LAND now will in the future turn out more profitable than gold and silver...

If you have to keep paying for it (property taxes) and you are limited by what you can do on it (use restrictions), then you don't really own it. We are in the midst of an economic war, and as Patton said, "Fixed fortifications are a monument to the stupidity of man."



772. Post 5482176 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: yrtrnc on March 03, 2014, 01:45:58 PM


Which is why said that the primary lesson from that story was to avoid such situations if possible.

According to the story, its inevitable!
 "It does not matter what will happen: an earthquake, a war, a tsunami, aliens, terrorists, economic collapse, uprising. The important part is that something will happen."

So stay mobile.



773. Post 5482365 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: octaft on March 03, 2014, 01:45:27 PM

Your mother is your primary female role model whether you chose to acknowledge that or not. Mom was a keeper, which explains why Dad kept her. My ex wasn't so I didn't. I don't hate women. It's just a fact that the ones available to me are unsuitable for long term commitment. I'm not crying about it. I enjoy the variety.

She cheated on you, didn't she? And you're scared to love again? Be honest, your life is a bad Barry Manilow song, isn't it? Come on, admit it, we won't judge you.

You crack me up. That's what would have had to happen for you to cram my narrative into your model of the way the world works, right?
Look, my ex is the mother of my daughter and I'm not gonna trash her to make myself look good to strangers. Think what you like. The fact is that there are very few women worth marrying and most of the ones who are don't stay on the market long. Women are a luxury.



774. Post 5482521 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: TERA on March 03, 2014, 01:25:59 PM
We have an overpopulation problem.

We don't have a quantity people problem. We have a quality people problem.



775. Post 5482587 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: octaft on March 03, 2014, 02:16:27 PM

Don't worry. Nothing you've said on the topic so far has made you look good.

Why do you think your opinion matters?




776. Post 5482669 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: yrtrnc on March 03, 2014, 02:22:36 PM
Wow, it's OT day on the Wall Observer thread!

OK, OK here's something on topic "Wales 'should be given more powers'"

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/wales-should-be-given-more-powers-30057865.html

You can't trust 'em not to welch on their commitments.



777. Post 5482802 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: octaft on March 03, 2014, 02:26:21 PM
I'd say my opinion is a lot more valid than "wimminz do wimminz stuff, menz do menz stuff," but the reality is I don't get to decide whether my opinion matters or not. That choice is left to the reader.

Obviously wimminz do wimminz stuff. That's why it's called "wimminz stuff".  Right?



778. Post 5482956 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: octaft on March 03, 2014, 02:41:44 PM
I'd say my opinion is a lot more valid than "wimminz do wimminz stuff, menz do menz stuff," but the reality is I don't get to decide whether my opinion matters or not. That choice is left to the reader.

Obviously wimminz do wimminz stuff. That's why it's called "wimminz stuff".  Right?

If you hated your ex-wife so much, why did you leave her?

I don't hate anybody except maybe Ryan Seacrest. There are people I care about and people I don't.



779. Post 5483145 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: TERA on March 03, 2014, 02:46:12 PM



LOL! That's how you get a chick to show you the goods. Ok T- ya got over ten grand in your trading account, so I assume that means you started with about fifty bucks, right?

Women are a precious commodity.




780. Post 5483586 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: octaft on March 03, 2014, 02:59:32 PM

Women are a precious commodity.

Clearly you believe this, as evidenced by how highly you speak of them in general conversation. Oh wait...

I don't play checkers with my dog. I don't tow trailers with my motorcycle and I don't get tax advice from the guys at the gym. Everything has its purpose.

Schwing! Can I get a Choo Choo?



781. Post 5483892 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):




782. Post 5485953 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

$650



783. Post 5486012 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on March 03, 2014, 05:37:01 PM
Wow that is so totally bullshit what is happening right now. I think a big fat trap before we go sub 500...

Delicious. A Schadenfreude sundae with a cherry on top.



784. Post 5486191 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: TERA on March 03, 2014, 05:43:00 PM
My $666 resistance came into play perfectly. ($660)

That's probably all for a couple weeks now.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!





785. Post 5486653 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

COINBASE BUY PRICE IS LOCKED ON $699- I CAN'T EVEN RELOAD! i PREDICT THE WILL RUN OUT OF COINS SHORTLY.



786. Post 5486903 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: TERA on March 03, 2014, 06:12:52 PM
Just shorted my coins 710 to 670 and back in.

I think we all did that. Too bad ya didn't have more coins to short!



787. Post 5493144 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

You guys realize we went from $400 to $700 in a week, right? At that rate, we'll be over $6000 in month.

Extrapolation, bitchez!



788. Post 5509841 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: dreamspark on March 04, 2014, 06:12:28 PM
If we dont go up from here then we're still in the main downward channel from the ath. We need to break this to confirm a true reversal


Meaningless analysis. It depends entirely on which time scale you are using.

We had a reversal at the 400 bottom and yesterday we saw confirmation. It was a massive confirmation so the consolidation period should take a while. Fortunately, I made enough money yesterday to survive for another month before needing to cash out any more profits, so I can let most of them ride. There is resistance at $700 and support at $662 and $642 in this range.



789. Post 5510327 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: kkaspar on March 04, 2014, 06:41:40 PM
Are you telling me that one of the biggest exchanges losing their customers money didn't cause a reversal from a downtrend that was caused by the loss of demand in China? How can this be? :O This is impossible!

Smiley

Sounds like you missed the rally and hope to get another crack. GTFO. The correction to $530 was because of China. Gox took us down to $400. These things can overlap.



790. Post 5511017 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 04, 2014, 07:24:42 PM

* I am not a libertarian. I believe that governments are useful and necessary, and we should fight to democratize and improve them rather than abolish them.

Governance is more than useful. It's absolutely necessary, but that doesn't mean a monopoly provider of governance is necessary or more useful than the alternatives. Democracy can only reduce the tyrannical aspects of governance to the degree that it reduces its effectiveness overall, and it's not even very good at doing that. Democracy is the dominance of the minority by the majority by definition.




791. Post 5511293 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: kkaspar on March 04, 2014, 07:38:29 PM
Are you telling me that one of the biggest exchanges losing their customers money didn't cause a reversal from a downtrend that was caused by the loss of demand in China? How can this be? :O This is impossible!

Smiley

Sounds like you missed the rally and hope to get another crack. GTFO. The correction to $530 was because of China. Gox took us down to $400. These things can overlap.

Yes, you are absolutely right. I'm angry because there won't be any volatility any longer in the crypto scene to make money at the expense of fools. So I just invented this so called "demand in China" and how it's loss caused a boring 2 month long dead cat bounce.
But I'll try to correct my ways and listen to the TA wizards here who have skillz of drawing linez.

Smiley
China didn't have anything to do with the downtrend in February, and there is no reason to suppose demand in China is decreasing. The biggest issue with China recently was the uncertainty of what would happen on January 31st (which amounted to nothing); and all we did in January was fluctuate around $800 while worrying about the possibility of something on the 31st. February's downtrend was caused by uncertainty in mtgox and other exchanges, lies about the extent of transaction malleability, some finally mtgox's insolvency. Those issues have mostly been resolved at this point. I wouldn't wait for cheap (sub 600) coins anymore at this point. I think the downtrend is over, unless we get more seriously bad news, which is never unlikely in the bitcoin world.

It was game over for bitcoin in China when it was announced that there is no future for legal business supported by bitcoin. It ment that no serious investors who want to keep solid relations with the government won't touch bitcoin. The market that is left is basically walking on a thin line, only waiting for getting shut down and possibly prosecuted. Only thing that created the long dead cat bounce was denial, desperation and stupidity. If you have been looking at the charts then you know that overall demand has constantly been dropping, with only thing holding the price up is that there aren't many people who are willing to sell cheap. But this in turn is causing a decrease in volume and only way to stimulate the market is lowering the price little by litle...this will reach a critical point when the "will of the hodlers" will break and there will be a nice fall.
Anyway, I'm not arguing about this anymore, I have found that sarcasm is more suitable for this place. I'm tired of the "line drawers" calling for new and new bottoms for these past 2 months. You do whatever you wish and believe whatever you believe.

The killer app for Bitcoin in China is that it is a loophole to evade capital controls. This hasn't changed. As theit national currency has devalued against the dollar and is likely to continue to do so, an inflation hedge is a secondary use. The gambling aspect just creates noise to obscure the underlying demand.



792. Post 5512128 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: uhoh on March 04, 2014, 08:00:22 PM


And you really believe that bitcoin is the best legal loophole in China to evade capital controls? Or even just a good way? Or that bitcoin is the most secure way to hedge against inflation? That a business owner actually buys bitcoins while saying "ha! now my wealth is safe in this stable and secure currency!".

They're evading capital control by moving wealth out of the country. Why, as you suggest, would they be holding bitcoin at the endpoint?

They wouldn't necessarily, but mobile capital has utility that the relatively immobile yuan doesn't. They possibly might hold BTC as an inflation hedge as I mentioned, but volatility obviously limits the appeal.

Bitcoin is easier, safer, and less time-consuming than booking a trip to Macau and buying poker chips just to cash them out in a different currency. Going through all the trouble of creating a shell company can't be a better loophole either unless you are dealing with substantial sums.



793. Post 5512759 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: TERA on March 04, 2014, 08:48:07 PM
I've been pretty bullish lately but I do have one concern. The injection of fiat into bitstamp order books seems to have stopped. There isn't any more fiat on the books nows than there was in the past week in the 500 levels. The amount of selling (in btc) to reach 400 is exactly the same and the total amount of fiat on the books is actually LESS because all the bids in the 300s and 200s were removed.  If I don't see another fiat injection in the next week, I am going to get really concerned.

I'd be more concerned by that $633 flash crash. Where the hell is Slovenia, anyway? It's 2014 and I can't believe we don't have better exchange options yet. Huge entrepreneurial opportunity for somebody who can recognize the need for transparency.



794. Post 5513466 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: ChrisML on March 04, 2014, 09:28:27 PM
Eh, what the living fuck.

BTC-E @ $648
Stamp @ $663
coindesk @ 658

Keep your shit

 together people.

CB was at $668



795. Post 5513881 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: bitcodo on March 04, 2014, 09:34:01 PM

Go back to school and you will know where Slovenia is. It seems it is leading country for cryptocurrency trading. Still waiting for someone else from respectful country like yours to show something better.
Some have Hitler and Bosh, some have Bush and you, but we have Bitstamp.


Anyway, the 'glitch' was just the begining.


All your bitcoins are belong to us.

According to Wikipedia, Slovenia wasn't even a country until 1991, by which time I was out of school. It was part of Yugoslavia before that, which makes sense. Bitstamp code is to computer engineering as the Yugo was to automotive engineering.





796. Post 5515892 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: seleme on March 04, 2014, 10:58:19 PM


I mean, seriously, how fucked and out of this world and some general knowledge, one has to be to need Wikipedia to find out about Slovenia.

But gues, it's not strange since Bush was on one meeting in Slovenia back at his president time and said - "I'm so glad to finally visit Slovakia."

You Americans are such fucktards sometimes  Grin

It's not my fault Slovenia is small and unimportant. What worries me is that it's an economic basket case, which makes funds there vulnerable. I live in Cajun Louisiana and I've lived in Mexico. It still shocks me how inept Catholics are at balancing a checkbook. There is a cultural tolerance for corruption rarely found in Protestant countries. I assume Orthodox countries are even worse.



797. Post 5519371 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: aminorex on March 05, 2014, 03:54:00 AM
Quote
It still shocks me how inept Catholics are at balancing a checkbook. There is a cultural tolerance for corruption rarely found in Protestant countries. I assume Orthodox countries are even worse.

 The Catholic/Protestant thing: I think it's because there's an elaborate system for penance in Catholicism.  You just do what you do, and then get absolution later.  Protestants claim not to seek salvation by works, but they're always on the job, because their only priest is rather far away, and rather long in returning.  I think they just hide the corruption better.  

So Protestants are not less corrupt, only smarter? Bullshit. Some cultures are better than others.  Tolerance of corruption is a cultural value and it makes Catholic nations objectively inferior, poorer and weaker. -but also a lot more fun!



798. Post 5526409 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

I was complaining to CampBX on chat about their lack of volume. They responded "We don't think we have low volume." I pulled all my BTC out an hour later. F@!$%ng amateurs.



799. Post 5528321 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on March 05, 2014, 03:23:10 PM
I was complaining to CampBX on chat about their lack of volume. They responded "We don't think we have low volume." I pulled all my BTC out an hour later. F@!$%ng amateurs.
Why would you complain about that? Clearly its a tiny exchange.

They've been around for three years! You'd think they'd reduce their trading fees or court VCs to expand or something. They just don't act hungry for my business.



800. Post 5528898 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: slovenc on March 05, 2014, 05:04:05 PM
On Bitfinex i think are the lowest fees 0.15% per buying and selling.
and if u wanna trade a lill bit more risky, you can choose to margin trade where a leverage is 2.5:1.

I don't trust these opaque exchanges! I pay an outrageous 2% plus spread to Coinbase for every sell/buyback and I can't even do a simple f#cking limit order. Second Market wants to play New York Bitcoin Exchange and they don't have a single goddam broker I can use. Kraken needs to get crackin' if they want to be the Charles Schwabb of BTC.

I'm a buyer at $645 and a seller over $695 until the weekend or until the next breakout, whichever comes first.



801. Post 5529186 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 05, 2014, 05:30:37 PM
On Bitfinex i think are the lowest fees 0.15% per buying and selling.
and if u wanna trade a lill bit more risky, you can choose to margin trade where a leverage is 2.5:1.

I don't trust these opaque exchanges! I pay an outrageous 2% plus spread to Coinbase for every sell/buyback and I can't even do a simple f#cking limit order. Second Market wants to play New York Bitcoin Exchange and they don't have a single goddam broker I can use. Kraken needs to get crackin' if they want to be the Charles Schwabb of BTC.

I'm a buyer at $645 and a seller over $695 until the weekend or until the next breakout, whichever comes first.

bad choice

flagpole pole is targeting 730+, and thats just the beginning.

keep your coins safe and wait for my go.




LOL you talked me into it, but I'm still a buyer at $645.



802. Post 5529536 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on March 05, 2014, 05:51:11 PM
I was complaining to CampBX on chat about their lack of volume. They responded "We don't think we have low volume." I pulled all my BTC out an hour later. F@!$%ng amateurs.
Why would you complain about that? Clearly its a tiny exchange.

I'm sure they uncorked some champagne and had a helluva party when BJ left.

I could have filled their entire order book with the BTC on my phone app.



803. Post 5529947 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: tailor on March 05, 2014, 06:07:30 PM
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/03/doomsday-cult-of-bitcoin.html

The above quoted article is such bullshit that it is hardly worth repeating.... Maybe I am guilty of the same but I just wanted to make clear my referent?   Surely, with any movement, there are going to be some people who are true believers, and they have NO basis in fact for their beliefs - however, to put bitcoin in that category and to suggest that a lot of bitcoin followers fall into cultish behavior attempts to poo poo and to minimize a large number of concrete and positive contributions of bitcoin.  

Your outright dismissal of the article is exactly the type of cultish behaviour the author is talking about - dismiss anything that doesn't fit the faith view.

What concrete contributions has bitcoin made? It certainly hasn't changed the world yet, and it's highly unlikely it will without some drastic change to the limited exchange problem. The killer app for BTC could be transferring money online, but that only works if it can be easily converted to local currency.
Give these things time for pete's sake.  A little over a year ago disbelievers were saying that no serious company accepted bitcoin, that you couldn't buy food with it etc. , and that therefore it wasn't useful and had failed....  Now look at overstock.com, food delivery services, etc. ..

Absolutely. Slow and steady I can see.  It's the hype that's nutty - predictions of a 10x increase in value again with little to drive it. It's the hype that the author is talking about.

Last April, Jeffery Tucker predicted bitcoin would hit $1,000 by the end of the year. It was dismissed as hype. Another 10X valuation this year is unlikely but possible.



804. Post 5530240 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote
Your outright dismissal of the article is exactly the type of cultish behaviour the author is talking about - dismiss anything that doesn't fit the faith view.

Because we've read countless articles like that for 3 years.  These people obviously don't do research or they would understand that they are making very old arguments. What is cultish is to expect the same failed tactic to work this time. If you want to persuade us "cultists" of the error of our ways, then at least come up with a new argument.
If you're going to be a critic, at least be an original one.



805. Post 5532002 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: michaelGedi on March 05, 2014, 07:40:24 PM
Quote
Your outright dismissal of the article is exactly the type of cultish behaviour the author is talking about - dismiss anything that doesn't fit the faith view.
Because we've read countless articles like that for 3 years.  These people obviously don't do research or they would understand that they are making very old arguments. What is cultish is to expect the same failed tactic to work this time. If you want to persuade us "cultists" of the error of our ways, then at least come up with a new argument.
If you're going to be a critic, at least be an original one.

That same argument could be used by any belief system dismissing an article pointing out the behaviour.


the way bitcoin seems to polarise opinion eventually these articles will be one of 2 things. Either these articles will be right or these articles will be wrong.

If they are right then there will be no need for an "original" critique.

They have already been logically proven to be wrong. To date they have had no predictive value. You can't make up for lack of substance with repetition and volume. I like a good scary story. Scare me. These weak ass objections would be boring if it weren't for the schadenfreude they provide.



806. Post 5532148 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 05, 2014, 07:23:49 PM
walls up

arm fiat torpedoes, full spread!

FIRE!!!!!!!!!!

I want to suck in a few more bears first.

Conan! What is best in life?

Conan: To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.



807. Post 5532186 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: tailor on March 05, 2014, 08:05:51 PM
They have already been logically proven to be wrong. To date they have had no predictive value. You can't make up for lack of substance with repetition and volume. I like a good scary story. Scare me. These weak ass objections would be boring if it weren't for the schadenfreude they provide.

What's been logically proven to be wrong in the article being discussed?

This is what I'm talking about. Do your own fucking research. You may not be tired of repeating yourself, but I am.



808. Post 5536575 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

in opportunity costs, it's well north of a billion. Millions of unpaid man hours of work. I don't think it's legit to count opportunity costs, because that's not how infrastructure costs are usually calculated.



809. Post 5537264 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

http://ultra-coin.com/

dropping at zerohedge and elsewhere. That infrastructure we were talking about?

I'm gonna beta test the shit out of this thing.



810. Post 5541031 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on March 06, 2014, 04:18:57 AM
major flashback to the +/- 5 dollar days. <- edit for clarity: referring to the 4 or 5 months where we were stuck at 5 bucks, give or take.

I think about this when people start getting bored after slowness for 2 days in a row. These people would never have survived that period.

It was too painful. I put my coins in cold storage.



811. Post 5549638 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

The vultures are descending. You need to understand how journalists think. I was on my college newspaper, so I have a little experience.

This article http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3

is going to be used as a rationalization that Dorian Nakamoto is a public figure, and therefor not subject to the legal protections provided to private citizens.

They are going to hound this man. He needs to lawyer up in a hurry.



812. Post 5549886 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: FierceRadish on March 06, 2014, 04:28:20 PM
The vultures are descending. You need to understand how journalists think. I was on my college newspaper, so I have a little experience.

This article http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3

is going to be used as a rationalization that Dorian Nakamoto is a public figure, and therefor not subject to the legal protections provided to private citizens.

They are going to hound this man. He needs to lawyer up in a hurry.

I simply cannot believe that the man who wrote this:

"Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model."

Also wrote this:

"the parking fee + gasoline costs $10 now to get there from my home and i would go there more often with my mother for shoppings."

Journalism is a cutthroat business and they only need the slimmest of pretexts to do awful things to people.



813. Post 5550141 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: FierceRadish on March 06, 2014, 04:36:57 PM
The vultures are descending. You need to understand how journalists think. I was on my college newspaper, so I have a little experience.

This article http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3

is going to be used as a rationalization that Dorian Nakamoto is a public figure, and therefor not subject to the legal protections provided to private citizens.

They are going to hound this man. He needs to lawyer up in a hurry.

I simply cannot believe that the man who wrote this:

"Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model."

Also wrote this:

"the parking fee + gasoline costs $10 now to get there from my home and i would go there more often with my mother for shoppings."

Journalism is a cutthroat business and they only need the slimmest of pretexts to do awful things to people.

Yes, I get that. But I'm pretty much saying that they've got the wrong guy. And the fallout, for him, will indeed be pretty awful for a while.

I don't know about that. I think it's likely that whoever wrote about train service is not the same Dorian Nakamoto, but that doesn't matter. The DM doxxed by McGrath will need money for lawyers and security to protect himself and his family, which means that if he really is SM, he may need to sell some BTC, which would rattle the markets.



814. Post 5551527 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: Miz4r on March 06, 2014, 05:17:24 PM

Saw it yesterday, yep that's pretty much me. Love it. Cheesy

Me too, except I'm constantly gushing about the solution to the Byzantine General's problem. He needs to include that in the next installment.



815. Post 5551648 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Dorian Nakamoto's family does not live in poverty. Beaverton, OR where his daughter lives is a wealthy suburb of Portland. Nothing in the article suggests his family is poor.



816. Post 5560481 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: seleme on March 07, 2014, 02:14:26 AM
hopefully that...ahem..."reporter" loses her job and ends up pole dancing for crack money

in other news

DAILY CROSS!

Daily cross what?

down trend officially reversed on the daily chart. the 24 hr moving average.



817. Post 5561337 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: TooDumbForBitcoin on March 07, 2014, 03:15:41 AM
Quote
He said ~ I am not involved with Bitcoin.

Incorrect.  He said, "I am no longer involved with that".  

What we don't know is exactly what Nancy Grace asked him.  She wants readers to think she asked him about Bitcoin, but she does not say explicitly in the article exactly what she asked him.  When she posts the exact question she asked him, and she knows what it is, then that can be discussed.  Until then, his quote in Nancy Grace's fiction piece has nothing to do with Bitcoin.

Dorian said in the AP article, "I was referring to engineering."

I believe Dorian, not Nancy Grace.

Her name is leah McGrath, and it would be sweet irony if her personal phone number, email, social security number and personal address would appear online. Bonus for naked pictures.



818. Post 5562099 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: lyth0s on March 07, 2014, 04:19:09 AM
Should we be expecting satoshi to start posting on the forums again?

No.



819. Post 5562464 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 07, 2014, 04:39:54 AM
Quote
a real audit must include everything, otherwise it is worthless.  If the exchange has just enough funds to cover the client balances, but also owes 100 million USD to a bank, then it is insolvent.  The clients do not have priority over the bank, they are all creditors.

I see your point but I disagree with the priority and faced with a choice between two exchanges, one offering each perspective I'll go with the one who ensures the customer deposits first and pays the bank back second. Banks accept the risks of loans as part of their business plan and have insurance for defaults but I don't.

Unfortunately, no exchange can guarantee that.

The owner of an exchange who finds himself in an insolvent situation simply cannot keep operating the business in an ethical way.   To keep it open, he will have to  stall and deceive his clients and other creditors any way he can, no matter what he promised.  MtGOX showed that clients are much easier to "manage" in this sense than a bank.

The only ethical alternative, in that situation, is to close the exchange and file for bankruptcy.  But then the owner loses control of who gets paid first; indeed, the main goal of the bankruptcy process is to ensure that all creditors are treated fairly.  (Some creditors may have priority by law.  If I understood correctly, in Japan employee salaries and benefits are paid first.  I don't recall any such fine distinctions as client vs bank.)

If an exchange is holding my bitcoins, it owes me bitcoins. If a kennel is holding my dog, it does not owe me the monetary equivalent of my dog. If my dog is lost, they must find it. Proof of solvency is so easily achievable than any exchange that doesn't provide it should be suspect. This should be a MINIMUM security precaution. 



820. Post 5570508 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Weeeeee! cheap coins! Just got back all the coins I sold at $700.   



821. Post 5570593 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: kkaspar on March 07, 2014, 03:34:29 PM
As it seems, this weekend will see a nice downfall, probably even a flash crash. People are getting tired of waiting for Santa Whale to buy their "cheap coins". The smart ones are getting out earlier, the rest will be waiting for miracles until it's too late.

You got a short memory, Hoss. We are following the same pattern from the ramp from $400 to $607 then a pull back to $533 before the next ramp to $710.

tide always goes out before the Tsunami.



822. Post 5572771 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 07, 2014, 05:43:44 PM
any bad news, or are we going down because low price going slightly lower is scary?

major moves on the block chain.



823. Post 5573784 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

YES! just bought back the coins I sold at $650-675!  all my coins back and sitting in profit. If we go below $600, I'm gonna turn that profit into MOAR COIZ!!!



824. Post 5576604 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

It's naive to expect people with market clout not to use it. Align your interest with ours at let let power work for you.



825. Post 5588480 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

There will be a lot of buying before MOnday. A lot of people are waiting for the best week end price, We are playing a game of chicken trying to get in at the lowest price before the (almost) inevitable Sunday night ramp.

I am not greedy. I already replaced all of the coins I sold at $700 and the high $600s. Now if we see another dip, I can buy even MOAR.



826. Post 5588690 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-07/jpmorgans-biggest-concern-bitcoin-will-succeed

Then they fight you...

The logical thing for JPM to do here is to hedge against that possibility by buying bitcoin. It's not the people who avoid taxes in poor countries that make it poor. It's the onerous government that they are trying to hide from.

Taxes are theft. It doesn't matter what the revenue is spent on. Involuntary takings are theft regardless of who is doing the taking.



827. Post 5601523 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: Wary on March 09, 2014, 07:41:11 AM

If the ratio of moneyflows to market price does not change, the cycles will continue unabated.  Their remarkable regularity is likely to result in attempts to front-run the cycle, and hence accelerate it.  That may also tend to blunt the extremes a bit, smoothing them over a diversity of participants.  Persistently retaining value will be likely to incentivize greater moneyflows, however, now that the financial world has actually caught wind of crypto.
Maybe that's what is happening now. According to the pattern, there must be a rise now, so whales are buying. But they are doing it too soon, there is no real grassroot push yet, so the price slides back.  

That's exactly what's happening now and anyone not front-running the cycles is just giving money away. For example, the weekend dip is an intentional attempt to incite panic and scoop up cheap coins. this weekend was moderately successful, but the probability that the price will recover above $650 in the next 24 hours is significantly higher than 50/50. I wouldn't be surprised if it reaches $670 tomorrow.

Yer not gonna see a grassroots push until after we hit ~$750 again. It doesn't matter. There's 100,000 whales on Wall Street and it only takes about one percent of them to see the advantage of getting into crypto at this stage.



828. Post 5607880 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 09, 2014, 09:14:53 AM

If the ratio of moneyflows to market price does not change, the cycles will continue unabated.  Their remarkable regularity is likely to result in attempts to front-run the cycle, and hence accelerate it.  That may also tend to blunt the extremes a bit, smoothing them over a diversity of participants.  Persistently retaining value will be likely to incentivize greater moneyflows, however, now that the financial world has actually caught wind of crypto.
Maybe that's what is happening now. According to the pattern, there must be a rise now, so whales are buying. But they are doing it too soon, there is no real grassroot push yet, so the price slides back.  

That's exactly what's happening now and anyone not front-running the cycles is just giving money away. For example, the weekend dip is an intentional attempt to incite panic and scoop up cheap coins. this weekend was moderately successful, but the probability that the price will recover above $650 in the next 24 hours is significantly higher than 50/50. I wouldn't be surprised if it reaches $670 tomorrow.

Yer not gonna see a grassroots push until after we hit ~$750 again. It doesn't matter. There's 100,000 whales on Wall Street and it only takes about one percent of them to see the advantage of getting into crypto at this stage.

I'm not psychic. I''m just that good.



829. Post 5614752 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 10, 2014, 12:40:43 AM
Involuntary takings are theft regardless of who is doing the taking.

Or how.

Taxation.


Taxation and theft are of two different categories...

Also, I would NOT categorize taxation as an involuntary taking.... ... even though there are some difficulties in electing within which society (community) and set up that we want to live.  The role of government tends to be a complicated topic... and such topic has been especially inflammatory from time to time....

Oh yeah, and theft within the government can be quite complicated as well.... yet mostly different from the kinds of thefts going on in bitcoin circles.

We have a fundamental difference in outlook. It is a commonly believed lie that if the group of people have a certain cloak of legitimacy and do the taking ostensibly for the benefit of the victims and go by a certain "transparent" process that such involuntary takings are not in fact theft. All this means is that it is a successful theft, not something else. I will not budge on this. If I am imprisoned and I eat the prison cafeteria food to keep from starving, it does not mean I volunteer to be imprisoned. I do not consent.



830. Post 5614948 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 10, 2014, 01:56:40 AM
Also, I would NOT categorize taxation as an involuntary taking.... ... even though there are some difficulties in electing within which society (community) and set up that we want to live.  The role of government tends to be a complicated topic... and such topic has been especially inflammatory from time to time....

Try not paying and see what happens. Just because a gang outnumbers you does not make the robbery any the less.


I prefer NOT to get into drawn out discussion about the role of government, and/or the extent to which there is a consensual nature to being governed or being a part of a society. 

Nonetheless, I am suggesting that equating individualized theft (or being robbed by a corporation or being defrauded) with taxation will cause considerable oversimplification about the differing concepts and differing dynamics. 

Viewing taxation as theft (or as an involuntary taking) is bringing the wrong framework b/c questions about taxation are a lot more complicated than theft  or other categories of involuntary takings.  For example, you mention the size of the gang... and this seems to be fuzzy logic to view government as a gang.. .. as if you are being ganged up upon and that government is something apart from one's self... even though there remain tensions between community and self, theft is different.

It actually is the exact same thing. It's just that in the case of taxation the group doing the taken are much more powerful and at the same time believe (for the most part) that they are morally in the right (which they aren't in my opinion).

You as a citizen have a role in government, and you have a choice in where to live. 

Government is not Other people ganging up on you - even though frequently, it may seem as if an individual cannot do much to change the society in which s/he lives, but government is NOT the same as a thief. 

I have already made my point several times that a person asserting that the government is the same as a thief is failing to recognize complexity.. and chooses to simplify to the point of losing the point.. and if you keep repeating it over and over that government is the same it is the same, that does NOT prove any point.  Accordingly, there is NOT much use of continuing such a conversation in which I am saying that government is different from a thief.. and you (and others) are saying that government is the same as a thief.. We are NOT getting anywhere... and probably, it does NOT matter too much to the subject of this thread or the original point that was being made, which I believe was involving Mt. Gox taking BTC from customers.

Yes, I do have a role in government, and that role is to dismantle it or more accurately to allow it to dismantle itself as it is currently doing at an accelerated pace. Society needs governance, but that governance must comply with the values of the society itself, which in the West means consent of the governed. The American revolution was an attempt at governance with consent, but it was shortly hijacked (around 1787) when the constitutionalists nullified the Articles on Confederation. Clearly neither the Aritcles nor the Constitution were capable of embodying the ideals for which the war was fought.  Back then the technology to implement truly distributed governance was not available. It now is. Monopoly governance is not as Thomas Paine suggested a necessary evil. It is not necessary at all, at least not anymore.



831. Post 5615038 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

To suggest that a complex theft is not a theft merely because of the complexities involved is laughable. It's like arguing that a Boeing 747 isn't an airplane.



832. Post 5615168 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 10, 2014, 02:08:45 AM
 

I understand that it can be difficult to make changes in law or society - especially, the larger the community.  Don't get me wrong, I do NOT appreciate having certain rule imposed upon me; however, I try to find ways in which I can accept and live in harmony without proclaiming that the government is some alien entity that is separated from my human interests.  Personally, if I were to pick one thing that irritates me the most about government is NOT the concept of taxes, but instead it is the fact that money has too much influenced government and those with a lot of money are NOT paying their fair share of taxes.  Accordingly, regular people have to pay more taxes b/c of the money corruption  that has infiltrated into the most recent government(s)... worse in the past 20 years or so.

I don't agree to disagree when the issue at hand is whether or not I am a slave. This isn't hyperbole. I can't leave the country without permission and even if I am allowed to leave, I still must file U.S. tax returns for ten years. I can't vote to change the system. There is no option on the ballot to leave the elected posts empty for the next term. Democracy is not consent of the governed anyway; it is consent of the majority or more accurately the plurality.

Slavery won't go away because it is immoral. It will go away because it is economically obsolete. There's just not much profit in it anymore and it is becoming less profitable by the day.



833. Post 5615452 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 10, 2014, 02:42:43 AM
Shrem was likely set up by the US Govt (harassment of sorts).  

Well, I read that FBI document with charges against him, and they seem rather serious.

If the charges were drug buy/sell/use one could say that they had nothing to do with his role in the bitcoin movement.  But the charges are about his failure to do his duty as the AML person in his exchange.  Hard to dissociate that from bitcoin.  

It is expected that his friends would defend and support him, but having him as a spokesman for bitcoin, taking part in bitcoin roundtables, etc. looks very bad from out here.

Besides, why would the USG want to harass him? For his role in bitcoin?  But why him and not other prominent bitcoiners?

Charges does NOT a case make.  The government has to prove the charges, and if these are criminal the burden is beyond a reasonable doubt.  There are a lot of people who have been suppressed and oppressed by receiving criminal charges.  And, apparently, the evidence regarding Shrem came from his voluntary providing information b/c he was assisting the government to establish regulation...

I get the sense that he is a 24 year old that did NOT realize that he was getting in over his head, and the government was setting him up b/c of his role in bitcoin.  From what little I know about Shrem, I doubt that he had criminal intentions.

Let's say for example, that you are engaged in a bank money exchange and your customers are drug dealers.  You may or may NOT be involved in their drug dealing business... but it seems that the government is trying to target someone who did NOT have illegal intentions....

Have you heard about some of the recent FBI stings regarding local bitcoins in which FBI agents pose as customers for bitcoins, and they tell sellers on localbitcoins that they are going to use the bitcoins to buy drugs (or some other illegal activity).  Why the hell should I give a flying fuck for what purpose the buyer wants the bitcoins, I am just selling bitcoins.  Anyhow, it is a form of set up to bust people who are selling bitcoins.... people who may have no intent to do anything illegal; however, the fact that the buyer tells them what he is going to do, then the seller becomes an accomplice.  those are bullshit setups.


The govt may pick shrem b/c he seems to be an easy target in terms of resources at his disposal and ability to defend himself and he also seems to be a fairly honest kid that just speaks his mind... without realizing that he is being set up in some technicalities.


Speaking of technicalities, we have a nice little cup and handle formation cooking on the 30 minute chart.



834. Post 5615797 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 10, 2014, 02:50:31 AM
 

I understand that it can be difficult to make changes in law or society - especially, the larger the community.  Don't get me wrong, I do NOT appreciate having certain rule imposed upon me; however, I try to find ways in which I can accept and live in harmony without proclaiming that the government is some alien entity that is separated from my human interests.  Personally, if I were to pick one thing that irritates me the most about government is NOT the concept of taxes, but instead it is the fact that money has too much influenced government and those with a lot of money are NOT paying their fair share of taxes.  Accordingly, regular people have to pay more taxes b/c of the money corruption  that has infiltrated into the most recent government(s)... worse in the past 20 years or so.

I don't agree to disagree when the issue at hand is whether or not I am a slave. This isn't hyperbole. I can't leave the country without permission and even if I am allowed to leave, I still must file U.S. tax returns for ten years. I can't vote to change the system. There is no option on the ballot to leave the elected posts empty for the next term. Democracy is not consent of the governed anyway; it is consent of the majority or more accurately the plurality.

Slavery won't go away because it is immoral. It will go away because it is economically obsolete. There's just not much profit in it anymore and it is becoming less profitable by the day.


I am sad that you live in a state of mind that you feel that you are being forced.  Yes, I agree with the government in A LOT of ways; however, mentally, I recognize the fact that I live in a community of people.  The world is NOT just about me, and in this community of people, a variety of compromises have been made.  Some of the compromises are pure bullshit... Well, maybe a lot of them are pure bullshit that are in place to oppress people.  I recognize the law as a weapon of the rich to oppress the poor - however, it seems that my mentality is different from yours b/c I am NOT going to expend all of my energies bitching and moaning about how unfair it is and suggesting that the only solution is to throw out the baby and the bathwater by some kind of ousting of government.  That is too outrageous b/c there are a lot of people in the community, besides me.   

Personally, I believe that if there were ways to remove money influence in politics, and we were able to elect people to serve the interests of the people as a whole, rather than the rich, then we would move a long way towards a better society. 

If you and I sat down for a beer, I am sure that there would be a lot that we would agree upon, but I am NOT going to agree that the starting place is to shut down government (tomorrow or next week).  Change needs to be more incremental and focused, if such change is going to be meaningful and a product of society rather than a product of the will of only a few.

How can you possibly infer that opposition to monopoly governance equates to opposition to community? That's the most baffling non sequitur I can imagine. If you think rule of law is essential (and it is) then you cannot let the law be subverted by allowing one entity only to interpret and enforce that law, because then you effectively have rule of man and not rule of law. Of course politicians are going to be bribed and the wealthy are going to bend the State to their will. They have the incentive to do so. No reform is possible with the existing incentive structure in place. I'm not advocating an armed insurrection. That would be futile. I am advocating participation in the system to the least amount possible until in crumbles under its own weight. 



835. Post 5617150 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: aminorex on March 10, 2014, 04:14:35 AM
I'm not advocating an armed insurrection. That would be futile.
Why? Moral precepts, first-order feasibility, or long-term sustainability?

The first would be insurmountable.  The second may be surmountable with surprising ease, by innovative technique.  The third is inescapably challenging.

It's just poor strategy to fight your enemy with his own preferred weapons. It's simply unnecessary anyway. The national governments of the world are doing a marvelous job destroying themselves. All we have to do it get out of the way.
Quote
Quote
I am advocating participation in the system to the least amount possible until in crumbles under its own weight. 

That may be no less futile, and all the challenges of the third rationale continue to apply.

Obviously it's futile, but that makes it no less worthy of an objective. On a long enough timeline, the survival rate of everyone turns to zero. I resist being ruled because it's in my nature to do so. That's simply what men do.



836. Post 5617540 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

http://www.newsweek.com/newsweeks-statement-bitcoin-story-231242

"Moreover, it encourages all to be respectful of the privacy and rights of the individuals involved.~Newsweek

We have a winner for the WTF award.



837. Post 5620164 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: TERA on March 10, 2014, 10:19:33 AM
Any reason for this dump or just mindless dumping because everyone else is?
2K BTC is nothing. That's not a "dump". The real problem is that there is nobody buying.

They are on CoinBase. I never had a shot at those $620 coins.



838. Post 5620292 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 10, 2014, 09:24:08 AM
 

I understand that it can be difficult to make changes in law or society - especially, the larger the community.  Don't get me wrong, I do NOT appreciate having certain rule imposed upon me; however, I try to find ways in which I can accept and live in harmony without proclaiming that the government is some alien entity that is separated from my human interests.  Personally, if I were to pick one thing that irritates me the most about government is NOT the concept of taxes, but instead it is the fact that money has too much influenced government and those with a lot of money are NOT paying their fair share of taxes.  Accordingly, regular people have to pay more taxes b/c of the money corruption  that has infiltrated into the most recent government(s)... worse in the past 20 years or so.

I don't agree to disagree when the issue at hand is whether or not I am a slave. This isn't hyperbole. I can't leave the country without permission and even if I am allowed to leave, I still must file U.S. tax returns for ten years. I can't vote to change the system. There is no option on the ballot to leave the elected posts empty for the next term. Democracy is not consent of the governed anyway; it is consent of the majority or more accurately the plurality.

Slavery won't go away because it is immoral. It will go away because it is economically obsolete. There's just not much profit in it anymore and it is becoming less profitable by the day.


I am sad that you live in a state of mind that you feel that you are being forced.  Yes, I agree with the government in A LOT of ways; however, mentally, I recognize the fact that I live in a community of people.  The world is NOT just about me, and in this community of people, a variety of compromises have been made.  Some of the compromises are pure bullshit... Well, maybe a lot of them are pure bullshit that are in place to oppress people.  I recognize the law as a weapon of the rich to oppress the poor - however, it seems that my mentality is different from yours b/c I am NOT going to expend all of my energies bitching and moaning about how unfair it is and suggesting that the only solution is to throw out the baby and the bathwater by some kind of ousting of government.  That is too outrageous b/c there are a lot of people in the community, besides me.   

Personally, I believe that if there were ways to remove money influence in politics, and we were able to elect people to serve the interests of the people as a whole, rather than the rich, then we would move a long way towards a better society. 

If you and I sat down for a beer, I am sure that there would be a lot that we would agree upon, but I am NOT going to agree that the starting place is to shut down government (tomorrow or next week).  Change needs to be more incremental and focused, if such change is going to be meaningful and a product of society rather than a product of the will of only a few.

How can you possibly infer that opposition to monopoly governance equates to opposition to community? That's the most baffling non sequitur I can imagine. If you think rule of law is essential (and it is) then you cannot let the law be subverted by allowing one entity only to interpret and enforce that law, because then you effectively have rule of man and not rule of law. Of course politicians are going to be bribed and the wealthy are going to bend the State to their will. They have the incentive to do so. No reform is possible with the existing incentive structure in place. I'm not advocating an armed insurrection. That would be futile. I am advocating participation in the system to the least amount possible until in crumbles under its own weight. 


I still ponder over whether we made any progress in our conversation regarding this topic.   I remain of the position that it is my belief that government serves way to many roles to either discontinue it or to completely ignore it.  If you do NOT participate in government, then others will, and the others who are participating are going to have more power and leeway b/c you are NOT participating.  I do NOT see that as a solution that will cause some ultimate pie in the sky collapse... as you are suggesting.  I also find it very unproductive for people to be spouting off that government is NO good without offering solutions.    I seem to be repeating myself.. in regard to saying that I cannot see it productive to just say get rid of all government.. makes little to NO sense to me.

We're not making progress because you are not listening. The solution to the problem of monopoly governance is distributed governance. Businesses can compete to provide traditionally state-provided services the same way they compete to provide any other kind of services. Public goods can be provided through assurance contracts. And the collapse is coming whether you can see it or not. You don't have to agree with my ideology. All you need is basic math skills. The Federal Reserve and many other central banks are near the zero bound already. With no capital formation it's only a matter of time.



839. Post 5620697 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: octaft on March 10, 2014, 11:40:19 AM
to which I say: WHERE THE HELL IS MY CHOICE TO LIVE WITHOUT A GOVERNMENT?

I am very curious what no government means to you, and why you'd want to live in a place without one. I mean, it's one thing to want less government intrusion, but are we talking less/no taxes, or are we talking no police department, no public schooling, no fire department. Where do you draw the line?

What is so difficult to imagine? People would shop for security, fire protection services and schools the same way they shop for anything else. The needy would be provided for by voluntary charity. We draw the line at the the initiation of force. Initiating or threatening violence is not what holds communities and society together.



840. Post 5620866 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: octaft on March 10, 2014, 12:06:46 PM
to which I say: WHERE THE HELL IS MY CHOICE TO LIVE WITHOUT A GOVERNMENT?

I am very curious what no government means to you, and why you'd want to live in a place without one. I mean, it's one thing to want less government intrusion, but are we talking less/no taxes, or are we talking no police department, no public schooling, no fire department. Where do you draw the line?

What is so difficult to imagine? People would shop for security, fire protection services and schools the same way they shop for anything else. The needy would be provided for by voluntary charity. We draw the line at the the initiation of force. Initiating or threatening violence is not what holds communities and society together.

What is difficult for me to imagine is why anyone not wealthy would want to live in that sort of environment.

Because they'd get to live around wealthy people.



841. Post 5621138 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: TakeTheSkyRoad on March 10, 2014, 12:10:25 PM
to which I say: WHERE THE HELL IS MY CHOICE TO LIVE WITHOUT A GOVERNMENT?

I am very curious what no government means to you, and why you'd want to live in a place without one. I mean, it's one thing to want less government intrusion, but are we talking less/no taxes, or are we talking no police department, no public schooling, no fire department. Where do you draw the line?

What is so difficult to imagine? People would shop for security, fire protection services and schools the same way they shop for anything else. The needy would be provided for by voluntary charity. We draw the line at the the initiation of force. Initiating or threatening violence is not what holds communities and society together.

If you haven't already I highly recommend reading the books by Ken MacLeod.

However the idealistic the dream the reality would probably put us back to the victorian age where the needy ended up in work houses and had to work for food but they didn't get anything else.  Just somewhere to sleep and food with no chance to improve their lot.

I've read Dickens, thank you. Victorian work houses were Victorian, as in under the monarch Queen Victoria. Adjusting for changes in technology, I hardly see modern public housing as an improvement. When people have to get their limbs sawed off one by one because they can't get off their fat asses long enough to prevent diabetes, those limbs are just as gone as they would be if they were caught in the machinery.



842. Post 5625875 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: octaft on March 10, 2014, 04:43:52 PM
So who builds the roads now? The government? No. It just pays for them. It hires private companies to build them (in most cases. Sometimes they will have their own national road building company) So how is that working out for us? Is it the most efficient way available? Is it the most fair? I would doubt it. Just because the government has been the sole provider of something during your whole life doesn't mean it is impossible to provide in different (and better) ways. What about progress?

And who will build them in your ideal world? The same private companies. Then who will pay for them? Who gets to drive on them? If it's tolls, the poor with commutes to their jobs will be adversely affected by it, especially when taken in the context of minimum wage no longer being a thing. If it's everyone pays a flat fee, again the burden is on the poor because paying $1,000 out of $10,000 hurts a hell of a lot more than paying $1,000 out of $100,000 (similar arguments work for thing like police and fire departments, etc.) If it's everyone pays a percentage of what they make, that's straight up taxes and the government is whoever is collecting those taxes.

No matter how you slice it, your world will in all likelihood suck for the have-nots.

Life always sucks for the have-nots but in our world there will be less of them. A booming economy creates a bidding war for labor, even unskilled labor.



843. Post 5626485 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 10, 2014, 05:26:20 PM


When do you expect this supposed governmental collapse?  In the lifetime of anyone reading this thread?  within 70 years?  I probably only have 30-40 more years left in me, at best, if I'm lucky.  

YOU are talking pie in the sky, if you think that you have a vision and a prediction about the downfall of government that is more sound and more realistic than anyone else's b/c your prediction is based on some kind of mathematics (that certainly cannot fail to prove correct, yeah right).

It's collapsing now. It may seem slow, but from a historical perspective, it's much faster than the decline of Rome. The standard of living in the U.S. peaked in the last half of the 20th century and is now declining. Europe is much the same.

U.S. government debt is now greater than 100% of GDP. We are literally living on borrowed time. Government entitlement programs are an actuarial time bomb. The collapse can be dampened (and prolonged and exacerbated) by money printing, but that's just an accounting trick. We are slowly becoming a third world nation.



844. Post 5627852 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: Richy_T on March 10, 2014, 07:13:43 PM
The above would be perfect. I would love for all roads to be build by private organizations and them charging toll. If you don't want to or cannot pay you have no business using the road. Of course this is only one of the government solutions.

I would love to live in a government-less society. We will get there the long way around by slowly eroding the governments away until there is nothing left.

Who says roads are the best way anyway? Tremendous waste of resources.

Excellent point. There seems to be a mental block by the central planners. The whole point of a decentralized society is that there is no central plan. If we could predict exactly how a stateless society could run, then central planning could work, and we know it doesn't. These people would rather have the certainty of a shitty system than the uncertainty of freedom. Where we're going, we may not need roads.



845. Post 5627924 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

If you claim the a monopoly government is necessary to prevent the predation of the disadvantaged by the powerful, then I ask, howz that workin out for you so far?



846. Post 5631744 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: octaft on March 10, 2014, 07:42:50 PM
If you claim the a monopoly government is necessary to prevent the predation of the disadvantaged by the powerful, then I ask, howz that workin out for you so far?

Here's a question: let's say you could, for the rest of your life, commit 30% of your income and savings to charitable organizations of your choice, with a certain amount required to go to basic needs charities, in exchange for never paying taxes on anything ever again. Would you say yes? If that's too much, what's the maximum you'd go up to?

My maximum is zero percent. It's my money. If I am forced to be charitable, it's not really charity, is it? How much freedom would you be willing to give up for freedom? Your question makes no sense.



847. Post 5632266 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: HerrAndreas on March 10, 2014, 11:16:43 PM
If you claim the a monopoly government is necessary to prevent the predation of the disadvantaged by the powerful, then I ask, howz that workin out for you so far?

Here's a question: let's say you could, for the rest of your life, commit 30% of your income and savings to charitable organizations of your choice, with a certain amount required to go to basic needs charities, in exchange for never paying taxes on anything ever again. Would you say yes? If that's too much, what's the maximum you'd go up to?

My maximum is zero percent. It's my money. If I am forced to be charitable, it's not really charity, is it? How much freedom would you be willing to give up for freedom? Your question makes no sense.
I fear you are mistaking money for freedom.
your freedom is always measured by the freedom of the people living around you.

Monetary freedom, financial freedom is the issue at hand. If you think otherwise, then it is you who are mistaken.



848. Post 5632395 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on March 10, 2014, 11:48:34 PM
Has anybody else noticed the volume on Gox has really dropped over the past couple weeks?

and the market has gone up over 50%. Coincidence?



849. Post 5633095 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: octaft on March 11, 2014, 12:21:38 AM
If you claim the a monopoly government is necessary to prevent the predation of the disadvantaged by the powerful, then I ask, howz that workin out for you so far?

Here's a question: let's say you could, for the rest of your life, commit 30% of your income and savings to charitable organizations of your choice, with a certain amount required to go to basic needs charities, in exchange for never paying taxes on anything ever again. Would you say yes? If that's too much, what's the maximum you'd go up to?

My maximum is zero percent. It's my money. If I am forced to be charitable, it's not really charity, is it? How much freedom would you be willing to give up for freedom? Your question makes no sense.

Billyjoeallen has the point go right over his head. Shocker.

My question is a test to see who cares about their ideals and who is just greedy. Judging by your response, it's all about the money for you, which suggests to me your odds of willfully giving anything to charity are extremely low. If that is the case, why should I believe your ridiculous "support through voluntary charity" argument. You clearly don't.

No, the point has gone over your head. Forced charity is not charity. Involuntary wealth redistribution is not efficient because the victims resist and evade. Wealth is destroyed in the process making everyone poorer. The size of the pie is just as important as the fraction of the slice. You don't seem to care about the poor and needy nearly as much as you care that I might possibly spend my money as I see fit and not as you think I should.

You spend your money your way and I spend my money my way. That's agreeing to disagree, but when you advocate theft against me, that makes you my adversary.



850. Post 5633234 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: octaft on March 11, 2014, 01:01:08 AM
Governments aren't corrupt. People are corrupt. Why do so many people think getting rid of the government gets rid of corruption? All it does is changes where it takes place.

For comparison, let's look at getting rid of ALL guns. What happens? Does murder stop, or do we only see a sudden jump in the number of stabbing deaths? I argue the latter.

Nobody is suggesting corruption can be eliminated, but corruption is less profitable when power is distributed. Democracy is an attempt to distribute power. We just want to take it a few steps farther.



851. Post 5633294 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: octaft on March 11, 2014, 01:13:58 AM

What is involuntary about it? It says "let's say you COULD," not "what if the rules changed." It's a voluntary option to get out of paying taxes, and I think it does a pretty good job of simulating what it would be like if we relied on voluntary contributions. The thing is, you all say that support will come from voluntary contributions, but when it comes time to actually, you know, contribute, all of you will be passing the buck. It's because it's not about the ideal, it's about the money, so stop bullshitting and acting like it's not. If the government charged no taxes, I assume a lot of you would care much less about getting rid of it.

Doublespeak at its finest. You have to pay taxes or an alternative that we're not going to call taxes? You should be a politician.

Please avoid the point that you will not be donating to charities voluntarily (and will be instead passing the buck) some more.

That's what your worried about? Free riders? You don't think we have free riders now? When were there ever not free riders?



852. Post 5633593 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: octaft on March 11, 2014, 01:26:25 AM

What is involuntary about it? It says "let's say you COULD," not "what if the rules changed." It's a voluntary option to get out of paying taxes, and I think it does a pretty good job of simulating what it would be like if we relied on voluntary contributions. The thing is, you all say that support will come from voluntary contributions, but when it comes time to actually, you know, contribute, all of you will be passing the buck. It's because it's not about the ideal, it's about the money, so stop bullshitting and acting like it's not. If the government charged no taxes, I assume a lot of you would care much less about getting rid of it.

Doublespeak at its finest. You have to pay taxes or an alternative that we're not going to call taxes? You should be a politician.

Please avoid the point that you will not be donating to charities voluntarily (and will be instead passing the buck) some more.

That's what your worried about? Free riders? You don't think we have free riders now? When were there ever not free riders?

Free riders currently are free riders because they can't afford to pay. In your world, free riders will be free riders because they don't want to help.

You still haven't answered the question: Will you, or will you not be donating to charities voluntarily in your world? I'm assuming the answer is no, and you will be passing the buck, mainly because if it wasn't, you likely would have rammed that fact so far up my ass I'd be tasting your thoughts by now.

oh really? So corporate welfare is not free riding or do you think they can't afford to pay either? Billionaire I.P. monopolists like software companies, movie studios and music moguls who use my tax money to enforce their copyright, trademark and patent claims aren't also free riders?

so I'm either ramming my charitable deeds up your ass or I'm uncharitable. I can't win with you, can I? The truth is you need to think I'm a contemptible person because that justifies stealing from me. This is the kind of dynamic that Statism engenders. It's a counter-civilization force. This is not civil discourse.



853. Post 5634023 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: theonewhowaskazu on March 11, 2014, 02:38:59 AM
All these people that say that they like charity fail to take into account one simple fact: The US Government has to be about the single most inefficient charitable organization in the history of existence.

Also, if they like charity so much, then why dont they (and others like them) provide the necessary donations, if they're so sure that you won't. The answer is, because they think that you'll end up contributing more than they will, or that they'll get something out of the bargain as well.

This is why a socialist state is fundamentally unsustainable, because everybody wants someone else to be putting in more than them. So, in order for everybody to be satisfied, money has to come from thin air. Some states have chosen to steal from others to come up with this, but the US has chosen to borrow.

Government borrowing is stealing. The loans come with promises to repay by taxing future generations. Talk about taxation without representation. Borrowing is popular because children don't vote.



854. Post 5635256 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 11, 2014, 04:10:34 AM
Various public goods and interests are protected through democratic processes - which also requires money (likely taxes, unless we come up with some other means to accomplish the same).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assurance_contract




855. Post 5635369 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: octaft on March 11, 2014, 05:07:39 AM


oh really? So corporate welfare is not free riding or do you think they can't afford to pay either? Billionaire I.P. monopolists like software companies, movie studios and music moguls who use my tax money to enforce their copyright, trademark and patent claims aren't also free riders?

so I'm either ramming my charitable deeds up your ass or I'm uncharitable. I can't win with you, can I? The truth is you need to think I'm a contemptible person because that justifies stealing from me. This is the kind of dynamic that Statism engenders. It's a counter-civilization force. This is not civil discourse.


And you need to think that I am some government hypnotized sheep to avoid having to actually answer the question, when really I believe that government, especially in it's current incarnation, sucks balls. I'm just not nearly as convinced as you are that magical mystical libertarian land is going to be this god-send solution to the problem.

The fact is, if you're going to use the whole "voluntary donations" argument, then please tell me who is going to be donating, because I'm pretty damn sure it's not going to be the people who equate taxes with robbery such as you, regardless of whether their comparison is correct.

The donators will be a mix of genuine altruists and people seeking status as philanthropists, no doubt.



856. Post 5635523 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 11, 2014, 04:24:00 AM
All these people that say that they like charity fail to take into account one simple fact: The US Government has to be about the single most inefficient charitable organization in the history of existence.

Also, if they like charity so much, then why dont they (and others like them) provide the necessary donations, if they're so sure that you won't. The answer is, because they think that you'll end up contributing more than they will, or that they'll get something out of the bargain as well.

This is why a socialist state is fundamentally unsustainable, because everybody wants someone else to be putting in more than them. So, in order for everybody to be satisfied, money has to come from thin air. Some states have chosen to steal from others to come up with this, but the US has chosen to borrow.

Government borrowing is stealing. The loans come with promises to repay by taxing future generations. Talk about taxation without representation. Borrowing is popular because children don't vote.


It seems that you are missing some essential elements in your quick rendition of the facts and the ramifications of borrowing or printing.

In essence what has happened since about the 1980s is that the US Government has increasingly let the rich off the hook.. by decreasing and decreasing taxes... .accordingly, instead of taxing them, the government borrows from them... which is really a bunch of bullshit.

Certainly, many of us here agree that there are a lot of messed up aspects in the current arrangement and how our tax money is being used.  Also, regular people are having to bear more and more of the burdens of failure to tax the rich.

It's not an issue of rich vs. the poor. It's an issue of people who use and threaten violence to get what they want and people who don't. There is less wealth disparity in societies with less coercion. 



857. Post 5635642 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 11, 2014, 05:41:45 AM

So my question to you is whether you know of any examples in which these assurance contracts have been applied in the real world  (NOT just hypothetical).


https://www.kickstarter.com/



858. Post 5635671 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: octaft on March 11, 2014, 06:06:09 AM


oh really? So corporate welfare is not free riding or do you think they can't afford to pay either? Billionaire I.P. monopolists like software companies, movie studios and music moguls who use my tax money to enforce their copyright, trademark and patent claims aren't also free riders?

so I'm either ramming my charitable deeds up your ass or I'm uncharitable. I can't win with you, can I? The truth is you need to think I'm a contemptible person because that justifies stealing from me. This is the kind of dynamic that Statism engenders. It's a counter-civilization force. This is not civil discourse.


And you need to think that I am some government hypnotized sheep to avoid having to actually answer the question, when really I believe that government, especially in it's current incarnation, sucks balls. I'm just not nearly as convinced as you are that magical mystical libertarian land is going to be this god-send solution to the problem.

The fact is, if you're going to use the whole "voluntary donations" argument, then please tell me who is going to be donating, because I'm pretty damn sure it's not going to be the people who equate taxes with robbery such as you, regardless of whether their comparison is correct.

The donators will be a mix of genuine altruists and people seeking status as philanthropists, no doubt.

One thing I will say about you vs. a lot of libertarians is at least you flat out admit it's about the money. Most use their ideals as an excuse, you're not trying to kid anybody.

Of course, some of them generally hold the ideal that giving government money is bad, but I think those people would much more readily take the "buyout" theoretical offer I put on the table. At least then you know where the money is going, I suppose.


Octaft: 

I believe that you are giving Billyjoeallen much more credit than he merits.  I have nothing against Billyjoeallen as a person and I am sure that he is representing ideas that are shared by others; however, he is discussing matters in such a pie in the sky world that it is very difficult to take the various arguments and proposals seriously.   


Nah, I gave him just the right amount of credit. He did indeed say it was about the money. It doesn't make me agree with him, but I am acknowledging that he did mention that the money was the most important part to him.

The NonAgression Principle is the most important thing to me, but if you have a differing view on what constitutes legitimate property, then you could draw the conclusion that it's about the money.



859. Post 5635737 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 11, 2014, 06:03:37 AM
All these people that say that they like charity fail to take into account one simple fact: The US Government has to be about the single most inefficient charitable organization in the history of existence.

Also, if they like charity so much, then why dont they (and others like them) provide the necessary donations, if they're so sure that you won't. The answer is, because they think that you'll end up contributing more than they will, or that they'll get something out of the bargain as well.

This is why a socialist state is fundamentally unsustainable, because everybody wants someone else to be putting in more than them. So, in order for everybody to be satisfied, money has to come from thin air. Some states have chosen to steal from others to come up with this, but the US has chosen to borrow.

Government borrowing is stealing. The loans come with promises to repay by taxing future generations. Talk about taxation without representation. Borrowing is popular because children don't vote.


It seems that you are missing some essential elements in your quick rendition of the facts and the ramifications of borrowing or printing.

In essence what has happened since about the 1980s is that the US Government has increasingly let the rich off the hook.. by decreasing and decreasing taxes... .accordingly, instead of taxing them, the government borrows from them... which is really a bunch of bullshit.

Certainly, many of us here agree that there are a lot of messed up aspects in the current arrangement and how our tax money is being used.  Also, regular people are having to bear more and more of the burdens of failure to tax the rich.

It's not an issue of rich vs. the poor. It's an issue of people who use and threaten violence to get what they want and people who don't. There is less wealth disparity in societies with less coercion. 

Wealth disparities have more to do with regulating and taxing the rich and the companies... rather than questions about coercion... You are really myopic and misplaced in your thinking if you are wanting to view the world through levels of coercion.. and then in the end your conclusions do NOT even seem to correlate with reality.... they are pure speculation with what appears to be your own definition(s) about what constitutes coercion.

You are putting in a lot of effort into not seeing the gun in the room.



860. Post 5650808 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 11, 2014, 11:50:39 PM

EXACTLY.... if you cannot see the logic of the obvious, then it seems likely that you gotta go study up on some basics and possibly to work on your analytical skills... .. Maybe take a few classes or practice reading, writing and math.. things like that.    The brushing up is going to vary from person to person.... ... and I suppose my main point here is that if you cannot see the difference between a thief and a government, and we CANNOT get beyond that basic logical point, then why are we wasting time to engage in a discussion that is NOT going to get us anywhere....   Clearly, I consider the two to be different, and clearly I feel that I need NOT explain anymore than I already have about why the two are different.

In any event, I have NO issues with exploring various possible discussions on a broad array of topics, so long as they do NOT devolve and continually repeat into the ridiculous and silly realm.... such as continuing to assert that governments are the same as thieves b/c they make you pay taxes.  I would laugh, if it were NOT causing me to cry over such need to repeat what to me seems obvious.   Cry

I have to concede that you are correct. The government is not a band of thieves. Thieves don't use violence or threat of violence to steal. Robbers do. The government is a band of robbers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robbery

To claim that your opponents argument is silly on its face is not a logical objection. It is an appeal to incredulity tionalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_from_incredulity and it's a logical fallacy.



861. Post 5652390 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 12, 2014, 12:37:36 AM

If you want to continue to assert that the government is the same as a robber, then why should we further engage in such discussion under the circumstances, that I am NOT going to go along with that stupid ass and simplistic framing of the situation.... that on the face of it, should be obvious to any one with brain cells and reason... although maybe the person would need to have at least the equivalent of a 6th grade education...  to be able to engage in more complex thinking... Now I should NOT be insulting 5th graders b/c I am sure that many of them should be able to understand the difference between government and robbers... even some 1st graders will understand such.


You do appear to have a first grader's understanding of the topic at hand. Government robbers are a subset of the larger class of robbers, which includes private sector robbers.
Grizzly bears and dogs are both mammals. The State and bandits are both robbers. They are different, but not in the ways that qualify them as mammals and robbers respectively.



862. Post 5652465 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: fcmatt on March 12, 2014, 02:17:27 AM
Is now one of those moments i will be kicking myself later if i dont buy?

I doubt it. Seems like big buys are moving the market up. not very organic growth. the buyers probably want to see if they can get the lemmings to join in then hammer it down come friday/sat. rinse repeat.

So it's either a low volume melt-up or big buys that aren't organic. What would qualify as a bullish signal to you?



863. Post 5652981 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 12, 2014, 03:16:41 AM

If you want to continue to assert that the government is the same as a robber, then why should we further engage in such discussion under the circumstances, that I am NOT going to go along with that stupid ass and simplistic framing of the situation.... that on the face of it, should be obvious to any one with brain cells and reason... although maybe the person would need to have at least the equivalent of a 6th grade education...  to be able to engage in more complex thinking... Now I should NOT be insulting 5th graders b/c I am sure that many of them should be able to understand the difference between government and robbers... even some 1st graders will understand such.


You do appear to have a first grader's understanding of the topic at hand. Government robbers are a subset of the larger class of robbers, which includes private sector robbers.
Grizzly bears and dogs are both mammals. The State and bandits are both robbers. They are different, but not in the ways that qualify them as mammals and robbers respectively.

So, why don't you answer the question then?  Are you going to leave your 1 year old with a dog or with a grizzly bear for safe keeping?

Neither, obviously. Robbers are to be avoided, whatever their other characteristics.



864. Post 5653648 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on March 12, 2014, 04:36:53 AM
Love those regulations?
http://money.cnn.com/2014/03/11/autos/tesla-new-jersey-ban/

This is the first time I've wanted to buy a Tesla. New Jersey seems to be dead set on remaining a joke.



865. Post 5655160 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: Erdogan on March 12, 2014, 08:30:48 AM

NOTE: Huobi's CEO denied allegations of fake trade volume, but said nothing about fake Glyptodons.


He also said (Bloomberg) that volume as a comparison between exchanges is mostly irrelevant because of the zero fee policy (which he plans to continue forever). He said exchanges should be considered on functionality, ease of use, security, customer relations and so on. I agree.


What's the business model of an exchange that charges no fees? How can they get the revenue to continue operations after the seed money runs out?



866. Post 5656808 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

There are two basic ways to influence behavior; you can use/threaten force or you can persuade. The taxers think that persuasion is insufficient encouragement in many cases to get people to contribute to public goods. I think this ignores shame. Shaming has been regarded particularly by leftists as an unethical tactic, even if used for socially beneficial ends, but that actually depends on what you compare it to. Compared to coercion, shaming reduces violence and carries lower social costs.

There is no reason to assume that a completely voluntary society would have any less competition for social status than our present society. By imposing status costs on free riders and rewarding status to contributors, there is every reason to expect that the net level of public goods would be just as high if not higher without a monopoly government. The difference would be in how those goods were administered and their composition. Contributors would have much more control over how their contributions were distributed with a result of more efficient administration.

Competition is the force that turned single-celled organisms into vertebrates, turned apes into engineers. Sanction against violence is what differentiates civilized societies from savages and barbarians. An optimized civil society is one where competition among members is encouraged in socially beneficial ways and discouraged with regards to initiatory violence.



867. Post 5662046 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 12, 2014, 11:53:19 AM
Billyjoelallen,

'Freeriders' are not a problem (not the small ones - technically anyone with no income is a free rider!). we have a massive surplus of work, everyone wants a job, but they are not needed, because the innovation we have seen in the 20th and 21st century has been immense.

But there is obviously a problem, this is that the income that a robot generates does not go to the poor guy it replaced, it goes all to his boss.

this is why today wealth disparity is greater than ever.

When I was young, I never understood why politicians were always trying to create work, how daft. I still dont understand.

There are always unpleasant jobs that go to people with low skills. The fact that these jobs are unpleasant is what motivates people to obtain skills, such as robot repair.



868. Post 5662362 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on March 12, 2014, 03:41:02 PM
Richy_T had some good ideas about balancing the budget, cancelling central banks and cutting down on government spending. These are nice, but I'm not sure they're doable. The very structure of the government as an institution prohibits them. Which is why I feel the need for non-governmental alternatives.

To be clear, I agree with you. When you look at the job that lays ahead and the history of the situation, it's a path that inevitably will not be taken. Unfortunately, the alternative is pretty catastrophic collapse with some very nasty consequences.

Unless, perhaps, another way presents itself. A way to detach from the sinking ship. I think that's what you're suggesting.

This is pretty much how I see it. Being an incorrigible optimist, I keep advocating for the peaceful, bottom-up, growing of alternatives. Even though I don't think there is a high probability we will see this. Lacking this path, there seems to be only the inevitable collapse which looms pretty scary.

Monopoly governments are engines for concentrating benefits and distributing costs. They are completely unsuited to do the opposite. Spending does not decrease generally because that amounts to concentrating costs of the budget-cutting on the spending beneficiaries.



869. Post 5662710 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: aminorex on March 12, 2014, 11:50:11 AM
...

I think you have found one of your core competencies, sir.  You articulate these issues with clarity, and with passionate conviction.  If you successfully avoided chest thumping and upsmanship, you could distinguish yourself to lead an army of anarchists to victory.

I am reminded:  Darkest before dawn.

In my working class corning or the swamp, a certain amount of chest-thumping is tolerated and expected, but I do recognize that it doesn't translate well sometimes. I also recognize the irony of leading an anarchist army. When the only costs you can impose are opportunity costs, getting the incentives right is crucial.



870. Post 5662951 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: aminorex on March 12, 2014, 05:30:07 PM
I'm still lacking answers on the whole "what if I decide to get a large crew together to violently take your shit" argument I presented earlier, as well.
That's why we have nation-states today.  The great 19th century innovation was total war.  Note that takings may be motivated by ideology as well as by colonialism.  Mutually assured destruction was effective at preventing a hot war during the late 20th century standoff between eastern and western blocs.  Studies of deterrence factors for crime indicate that severity of punishment is somewhat effective, but the most effective factors were promptness and assuredness of punishment.  Prompt and assured proportionate retaliation is the most effective deterrence to aggression.  This can be decentralized as well.  Switzerland has done this quite effectively.  Since every household was well-armed, even after fully encircling Switzerland, the Germans sought rapprochement rather than invading.  


Switzerland in the WWII era is informative. When dealing with a hostile threat, it's not necessary to possess the ability to defeat the aggressor. It is only necessary to present a less tempting target than the alternatives. Empires always crumble when the costs of administering colonies exceed the benefits of exploiting them.



871. Post 5663036 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: Syke on March 12, 2014, 06:12:08 PM
Is there anybody in this mighty thread who has used bitcoin for actually purchasing something with it besides FIAT ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=378936.0

cowboy boots and underwear at Overstock.com



872. Post 5663983 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

$200 billion in potential savings in retail, Etail and remittances. What about micropaypents, equities trading, voting, corporate management, wealth storage, accounting, and charities?

a $10,000 bitcoin at Google market cap is a reasonable expectation for the next couple of years, but he the upside potential is substantially greater than that.



873. Post 5664042 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: Richy_T on March 12, 2014, 07:11:34 PM
Okay, so you're willing to take things piece-meal. Great, but you didn't provide any solution to the problem. Pretend you're taking things piece-meal, and this information has just come up. I'm personally not the type who is comfortable with "crossing that bridge when you come to it."

And I am not the "grand solution" type not least since it has proven to be so disastrous in the past (and present). Answers are often not evident until situations arise. Do you really think crossing a bridge before you come to it has a desirable outcome?

Central planners are incapable of seeing the limits of central planning. They don't understand that the absence of answers to their questions is a feature of decentralization, not a bug.



874. Post 5665093 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 12, 2014, 07:57:20 PM
I'm looking for better definition on where you stand.

Alright, let's take this further: the argument is that we would support the poor through voluntary charity, yes? Now let's say after 10 years, charity turns out to be woefully inadequate. Let's assume that -- while the world has not devolved into chaos and anarchy as a result of a lack of government -- that some are suffering because not everything went as planned. There's slums with no police protection because everyone that lives in the neighborhood can't afford it. How do we approach that? Are some things up for socialization, or is it all strictly no go, no budge?

Sure, the poor ain't doing so hot right now, but in order for the change to be worth it, it's not enough to be different. It's got to be better, and noticeably so. The problem is better is subjective, and not everyone will agree on, let alone know, what better really is.

Oh, I'm fairly happy to take things piecemeal. If things don't appear to be working, back off and adjust approach. Obviously, I believe things would not tend to end up that way (though government action has created a huge underclass that would have to be accounted for) but I'm not one for big schemes that have to be implemented in one fell swoop (just look at Obamacare for how that kind of thing goes).

Basically I see it like a big game of Jenga. There are some pieces which can be taken easily and others which require the removal of other pieces before they can be taken without collapsing the whole tower. Fortunately, almost every step that is taken to improve freedom should make the next one easier.

Okay, so you're willing to take things piece-meal. Great, but you didn't provide any solution to the problem. Pretend you're taking things piece-meal, and this information has just come up. I'm personally not the type who is comfortable with "crossing that bridge when you come to it."

For that matter, what if there are no solutions to the problems that come up? What if it turns out that, for most, your idea is, in fact, a dismal failure? Or what if it's not even possible, for example forms of government start popping up because that's what people want. What if all these small governments start warring with each other? How do we set up an army to fight off an invasion from a country who doesn't share our approach? All of these are questions that need to be addressed before you take the leap.

I'm still lacking answers on the whole "what if I decide to get a large crew together to violently take your shit" argument I presented earlier, as well. That's a general statement to all who agree with you, not specifically directed at you. You can say all you want "it won't happen," but it will. There will always be monsters in this world who will take full advantage of whatever situation they are put in. It's just a question of how widespread it will be.

I have a lot of questions for libertarians that I want answered. I've been asking them for years. Most of them still haven't been answered. I thought that might change here, but I'm starting to lose hope and am almost to the point of writing it off as another lost cause.


I admire your persistence and your formulations of questions for the libertarians, and you are generally fairly polite in your presentation of various issues and various scenarios, yet it should be clear that trying to get concrete answers from the no government folks is an exercise in futility. 

It may be that they have an impossible task to describe some future society b/c no one person or group of libertarians are likely to be able to really design some community arrangement that adequately accounts for the variety of stakeholders (without involving some of the various stakeholders in the process).... which frequently causes the libertarians to speculate or to propose fairly specific plans that in fact have NOT been thought through very well.   

A voluntary society cannot be designed at all. It will be emergent. When a critical mass of people realize that the rules we tell children to live by (namely don't hurt people, don't mess with their stuff, and keep your promises) should be applied across the board, and that no other general rules are necessary, then such a society will form.

There can be no formula for dealing with people in need. As soon as such a formula is known, most of the marginally needy and some of the non-needy attempt to game the system. Subsidizing poverty creates more poverty. The best way to deal with those in need is on an individual case-by-case basis. It's too important of a problem to be left to monopolists. Concrete answers are wrong answers.



875. Post 5665270 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote
I'm still lacking answers on the whole "what if I decide to get a large crew together to violently take your shit" argument I presented earlier, as well.{/quote]

That's the beauty of decentralization. The answer is "I will resist you in ways you won't expect."



876. Post 5667767 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

I for one welcome our new corporate banking overlords. They think they are co-opting our technology when in reality it is our technology that will be co-opting them.

By far, the thing most commonly traded for bitcoin is U.S. dollars. The thing most commonly traded for corpcoins will be bitcoin. It is the most liquid cryptocurrency. Almost anything that is good for crypto is good for Bitcoin.  Bitcoinbuilder showed us an exchange can be put up in a day. It's impossible to make an altcoin that isn't an on-ramp to bitcoin. It's another facet of the anti-fragility of our system.



877. Post 5667956 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 12, 2014, 10:57:55 PM
Billyjoelallen,

'Freeriders' are not a problem (not the small ones - technically anyone with no income is a free rider!). we have a massive surplus of work, everyone wants a job, but they are not needed, because the innovation we have seen in the 20th and 21st century has been immense.

But there is obviously a problem, this is that the income that a robot generates does not go to the poor guy it replaced, it goes all to his boss.

this is why today wealth disparity is greater than ever.

When I was young, I never understood why politicians were always trying to create work, how daft. I still dont understand.

There are always unpleasant jobs that go to people with low skills. The fact that these jobs are unpleasant is what motivates people to obtain skills, such as robot repair.

all jobs that are necessary are filled, but when the worth of the employers welfare can be regarded less than the worth of their wages, then we have a fundamental problem in society.

work needs to be rewarded more than skill, if all the people in the world were 'skilled', some would still have to clean toilets, and they would deserve none the less for it. if not more!

It is not good that the labourers that form the foundations of society are paid the least. farmers, construction workers etc... they are worth more to us than lawyers. But because there are a surplus of them, they are treated as fodder. that is fundamentally the problem, capitalism has become more about economics than it is about welfare.

yet there is so much wealth in the world that everybody could live very comfortably, working much less and sharing shifts. the 'freeriders' are not a problem, and they are not the cause of the problem, they are the outcome of innovation. there are those who are disguistingly rich that continue to abuse power and stifle innovation strategically to maximise inequality. they are the root of the problem. there are 1500 billionaires in the world and 12 million millionaires..... does that sound right to you? no man needs a billion dollars, no man needs a million dollars.

You must have never been an employer. How can laborers be the foundation of society if they can be easily replaced by robots? Would robots then be the foundation of society? I agree that lawyers are mostly scum, but there is no way to overturn the laws of supply and demand by legislative fiat. Employers pay what they have to pay given the labor market conditions and workers take the best options available to them given the same. There will never be a time when the common man will only work for two days a week because competition for status and mates will exist at every wage level.

You would need at least a billion dollars if you were in love with Kate Upton and you were ugly. You would need at least a million dollars for any girl in the 90210 area code.

There are skilled labor shortages in many industries. There are unskilled labor surpluses. The free market could easily and quickly solve both these problems if the government would get out of the way.



878. Post 5668169 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Unskilled labor is honest work and there's nothing wrong with it, but if I get cancer, I don't need Consuela the cleaning lady to light a candle to Santa Maria de Guadalupe. I need a f*#!ing doctor.



879. Post 5668274 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 13, 2014, 12:16:49 AM

Innovation used to be this; a man builds a well. he is rewarded because he doesnt have to walk 5 hours a day to get water from a stream (free rider), and society is thankful to have a well in the community, he is praised.

today if a man builds the metaphorical well, he privatises the water system and everyone dies of thirst.

innovation does not naturally need monetary incentive.


I agree with you when it comes to patents, but privatized water systems usually come before the wells are dug. If anybody can trespass on my land to get free water, I might not dig the well in the first place. Also, letting everybody die of thirst would probably be bad for business if that business was selling water or even if it wasn't.



880. Post 5668370 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 13, 2014, 12:16:49 AM

if robots are the foundation of society, then we should all benefit equally from them.

Says who? We didn't all benefit equally from the domestication of cows. Some people are lactose intolerant. I really don't understand this obsession with equality that is unheard of in nature. It's completely subjective. Equality in outcomes or equality in opportunity? Equal rewards for effort or for productivity? The former produce what economists call "perverse incentives". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perverse_incentive

You really should read this: http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html



881. Post 5668473 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: Denton on March 13, 2014, 12:47:02 AM

if robots are the foundation of society, then we should all benefit equally[/i] from them.

Says who? We didn't all benefit equally from the domestication of cows. Some people are lactose intolerant. I really don't understand this obsession with equality that is unheard of in nature. It's completely subjective. Equality in outcomes or equality in opportunity? Equal rewards for effort or for productivity? The former produce what economists call "perverse incentives".

You really should read this: http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html
Even equality of opportunity is really bad because when driven to its logical conclusion it means putting everyone on the level of the lowest common denominator.

I would go even farther. The only way to make everybody perfectly equal is to blow up the planet and leave everybody equally dead and in exactly the same place.



882. Post 5669058 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: arepo on March 13, 2014, 01:15:58 AM

i agree that government and bureaucracy is in a large part obstructing some of the natural restructuring that would otherwise occur in the free market in today's stratified society. however, it is obvious that a paradigm shift occurred around 1970 when productivity, employment rates, and wages decoupled. i don't think it is a coincidence that this lines up with a shift towards automative replacement of many jobs, in both unskilled and skilled labor.

There's another explanation. "On 15 August 1971, the United States unilaterally terminated convertibility of the US$ to gold." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system

"this coupled with the severe contraction of the economy in 2008 and the jobless recovery since has produced and maintained feedback loops manifesting themselves as rapid stratification in both income and wealth distribution in the US and the world: wage suppression, natural monopolization and other effects of economies of scale, globalization of economies corresponding to globalization of inequality, and large profits for the business and financial elite corresponding to large negative externalities for everyone else. each of these items could be expanded into an entire thesis, but i won't go into more detail. the point is that each of these things are independent feedback loops that support and accelerate wealth inequality."

There is no such thing as "natural monopolization". Governments create monopolies. The free market resists them as mass resists acceleration. The only business model that can't be copied is government-mandated exclusivity. Bitcoin is probably the best example of free market dominance and even it faces hundreds of competitors eating into it's market share.


Quote
these issues are not directly traceable to meddling governments but may be exacerbated by them. it is particularly misguided to place the blame on governments when these problems are endemic to the apparatus as it stands now that we call Modern Capitalism. it is difficult for some to accept that the sacred cow of "capitalism" may have some natural tendencies towards non-optimal states, but the truth is that the free market is not an ideal, it is a thing that exists in practice, in many forms. some forms may be more desireable than others, and i certainly do not think the state of the apparatus as it exists now is desireable.

--arepo

Judging by the context, you aren't referring to capitalism at all, but crony capitalism or more formally corporatism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism

The free market is the best system we can aspire to, and even that will not be fully possible so long as monopoly governments exist. Due to the economic calculation problem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem, the price system is the most efficient, pragmatic way to allocate scarce resources. There are losers in the free market, but the only alternative is that everybody becomes losers as they squabble for ever shrinking surpluses until there aren't any anymore.




883. Post 5669340 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

If it were really true that replacing backhoe operators with shovels would improve employment, then why wouldn't we go further and replace shovels with spoons? The fact is that employers face competition for employees in a free market just as much as job seekers face competition for jobs. Wages are bid down AND up, so what ultimately determines wages is productivity. Backhoe operators are so much more productive than manual ditch diggers that society can afford to pay the manufacturers and servicers of backhoes, manufacturers of the parts , the miners and harvesters of raw materials and the suppliers of fuel substantially more than the unskilled laborers they displace.

I'm sorry, but if you are too stupid or stubborn to upgrade your skills when technology makes them obsolete, it's your problem-not society's.



884. Post 5669551 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 13, 2014, 02:33:49 AM
If it were really true that replacing backhoe operators with shovels would improve employment, then why wouldn't we go further and replace shovels with spoons? The fact is that employers face competition for employees in a free market just as much as job seekers face competition for jobs. Wages are bid down AND up, so what ultimately determines wages is productivity. Backhoe operators are so much more productive than manual ditch diggers that society can afford to pay the manufacturers and servicers of backhoes, manufacturers of the parts , the miners and harvesters of raw materials and the suppliers of fuel substantially more than the unskilled laborers they displace.

I'm sorry, but if you are too stupid or stubborn to upgrade your skills when technology makes them obsolete, it's your problem-not society's.

You cannot convince a starving person to die quietly when society leaves him behind, that he doesn't deserve to live because he is 'not good enough'. shit is going to get ugly under this model. no matter the perceived level of skill a person needs, the vast majority will always be relatively stupid.

and why should we leave them behind, there is more wealth in the world than ever before!

.......unless you want to argue that we need to self propagate. that is a sad truth.

I'm not attempting to convince him to die quietly. I'm attempting to convince him to do something society values enough to keep him alive. There are those that simply don't have that ability and they should be helped, but those who chose not to support themselves are choosing to die and I respect their choice, even if I don't agree with it.



885. Post 5669638 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 13, 2014, 02:41:56 AM

if robots are the foundation of society, then we should all benefit equally from them.

Says who? We didn't all benefit equally from the domestication of cows. Some people are lactose intolerant. I really don't understand this obsession with equality that is unheard of in nature. It's completely subjective. Equality in outcomes or equality in opportunity? Equal rewards for effort or for productivity? The former produce what economists call "perverse incentives". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perverse_incentive

You really should read this: http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html

ok, personally I dont like the word 'should' either. but you are proposing a system that must both destroy work (innovation) and create work (capitalism) at the same time. that is not an answer.

either we share work and hoard money, or we share money and hoard work. they work equally.

what doesnt work is when you hoard work and money - then the french revolution happens all over again and the skilled and educated lose.

Technology doesn't destroy work! Displaced autoworkers become robot builders and technicians and the pool boys at the gated communities of the wealthier GM executives and stockholders! That extra margin that automakers gain by automation is spent back into the economy. That provides jobs for service industry workers, etc. Would you rather be an assembly line worker with repetitive stress injuries or a golf caddy? I honestly don't think that you've thought this through.



886. Post 5669717 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: shmadz on March 13, 2014, 02:47:19 AM

thank you for this.

Thank Kurt Vonnegut.  All I did was copy and paste.



887. Post 5669760 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 13, 2014, 02:54:37 AM

if robots are the foundation of society, then we should all benefit equally from them.

Says who? We didn't all benefit equally from the domestication of cows. Some people are lactose intolerant. I really don't understand this obsession with equality that is unheard of in nature. It's completely subjective. Equality in outcomes or equality in opportunity? Equal rewards for effort or for productivity? The former produce what economists call "perverse incentives". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perverse_incentive

You really should read this: http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html

ok, personally I dont like the word 'should' either. but you are proposing a system that must both destroy work (innovation) and create work (capitalism) at the same time. that is not an answer.

either we share work and hoard money, or we share money and hoard work. they work equally.

what doesnt work is when you hoard work and money - then the french revolution happens all over again and the skilled and educated lose.

Technology doesn't destroy work! Displaced autoworkers become robot builders and technicians and the pool boys at the gated communities of the wealthier GM executives and stockholders! That extra margin that automakers gain by automation is spent back into the economy. That provides jobs for service industry workers, etc. Would you rather be an assembly line worker with repetitive stress injuries or a golf caddy? I honestly don't think that you've thought this through.

..... technologies sole purpose is to destroy work.

Close. Technology's sole purpose is to save energy. That computer you are typing on saves you the trouble of coming to my house and arguing your fallacies in person.



888. Post 5669897 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 13, 2014, 02:51:51 AM

Im from South Africa, I know if try and tell a guy on the street that, he will kill you take your every belonging to buy food and survive another day. there is no money there, there is no work, they are all slaves to capitalism. and I love those people, they are good people.

and killing and stealing is another free market system that really works.....

Killing and stealing only works until the productive people stop producing, and then everybody starves. The productive people started leaving South Africa in droves when the anti-capitalist Nelson Mendela took over. There's no place on earth with more natural resources per acre than South Africa. If people are starving there, then it's because the government killers and thieves created an environment hostile to peaceful trade.

 



889. Post 5670200 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: aminorex on March 13, 2014, 03:20:35 AM
Perfect equality of opportunity can never exist, but it is very much in everyone's interest to seek to achieve a condition in which most gross inequities are removed, where possible, because this means fewer people want to cut your throat badly enough to actually do something about it.


I think I understand what you are saying, but I believe it is my duty as a father to giver my daughter every advantage possible, which is the opposite of equality of opportunity. But it's also my duty to ensure that she doesn't end up in the position of Anastasia Romanov.



890. Post 5670310 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 13, 2014, 03:40:59 AM

Im from South Africa, I know if try and tell a guy on the street that, he will kill you take your every belonging to buy food and survive another day. there is no money there, there is no work, they are all slaves to capitalism. and I love those people, they are good people.

and killing and stealing is another free market system that really works.....

Killing and stealing only works until the productive people stop producing, and then everybody starves. The productive people started leaving South Africa in droves when the anti-capitalist Nelson Mendela took over. There's no place on earth with more natural resources per acre than South Africa. If people are starving there, then it's because the government killers and thieves created an environment hostile to peaceful trade.

 

of coarse Nelson Mandela was anti capitalistic, look how it ruined the country. 'The roads of the british empire are paved with the gold from Africa.'

"all the productive people" includes only rich white boys such as myself. I cant say that I was nearly as productive as those people on the street who have to break any number of laws and endure terrible fighting to gather those natural resources. they wouldn't call it capitalism them selves.

The reason why SA is very unproductive is because when the capitalists in America (that own most of the mining shares) hear complaints about wages in the coal and gold mines, they dont mind if the workers get shot when they protest. and that is the biggest export of SA.

those miners earn something like $1 per hour, and the mining debree is killing them.

South Africa was NEVER capitalist. Imperialism and colonialism is not capitalism. Capitalism is voluntary trade in a system that respects private property rights. What we have is the RELATIVELY capitalist apartheid system under P.W. Botha and the relatively less capitalist system that has been in place since then. Under most metrics, life for the average South African was better under apartheid, even with the gross injustices and racism.  Using South Africa as an example of failure of capitalism is like using alchemy as an example of failure of chemistry. It simply doesn't apply. Calling colonialism "capitalism" and then criticism colonialism is straw man argument at its finest.

There are lessons to be learns from South Africa, but no agreement is possible if we can't agree on the definitions of the terms we use.



891. Post 5670506 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: arepo on March 13, 2014, 03:59:41 AM


can you demonstrate how the Bretton Woods System would have the aforementioned effect on productivity and wages? cum hoc ergo propter hoc is a logical fallacy.

Quote

The Bretton Woods pseudo-gold standard provided some check on inflation. When it ended, inflation allowed employers to effectively reduce the wages of workers in terms of purchasing power without nominally reducing them. Wage competition did drive wages up, but at a lower rate than asset appreciation. As wealthy people saw their assets appreciate, poor people saw stagnant or reduced income and therefor a reduced ability to accumulate assets. Poor people attempted to compensate by borrowing which of course had the effect of increasing rather than decreasing wealth transfer to the wealthy. Banksters and their ilk got interest payments on top of profits and asset appreciation.

 I fear the situation is even worse than you suggest because the statistics are subtly altered to stave off social unrest.



892. Post 5670713 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

re: "natural monopolies"

examples include public utilities such as water services and electricity

o rly? So  the power company doesn't have to compete with solar, wind, gas and oil heat, etc?
The water company doesn't have to compete with private wells, water trucks, desalinization plants, and the f@#!ing rain?

Competition includes potential competitors and the providers of equivalent products. In the free market, any dominant company would soon face competition if they attempted to extract excessive rent (profits over and above normal profits) due to their dominant position. OR they would face reduced consumption of their product or service that would negate their dominant market position advantage.

http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae9_2_3.pdf











893. Post 5670828 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: Holliday on March 13, 2014, 04:41:36 AM
in other words, i don't care about your lofty Randian free market ideals. while capitalism may be "the best solution we can aspire to", and that would be hard to disagree with, it is also clear that our present form of global capitalism is suffering from a huge amount of inefficiencies, many of which cannot be attributed to meddling governments. how can we reconcile these two things? i have no clue, but we've first got to get our heads out of our asses and stop worshipping the sacred cow long enough to think critically about why the apparatus is failing at efficiently distributing resources.

We could start by understanding the differences between capitalism and corporatism.

I honestly and truly believe that almost all the inefficiencies can be attributed to meddling governments and political entrepreneurship of anti-competitive companies. I recognize this is a minority view, but I am prepared to argue it.

The global trade system we have today is not capitalism or free market. It is a hybrid system that gives us many of the worst features of corporatism, neo-colonialism and socialism. It has evolved and mutated over centuries but took its current form after WWII when the U.S. dollar became the world's reserve currency and just as importantly when all major currencies went off of the gold standard.

B




894. Post 5670886 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: donut on March 13, 2014, 05:04:49 AM
re: "natural monopolies"

examples include public utilities such as water services and electricity

o rly? So  the power company doesn't have to compete with solar, wind, gas and oil heat, etc?
The water company doesn't have to compete with private wells, water trucks, desalinization plants, and the f@#!ing rain?

Competition includes potential competitors and the providers of equivalent products. In the free market, any dominant company would soon face competition if they attempted to extract excessive rent (profits over and above normal profits) due to their dominant position. OR they would face reduced consumption of their product or service that would negate their dominant market position advantage.

http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae9_2_3.pdf


A question for you kind sir:

What happens when a rich guy comes in and lowers his prices enough to squeeze out competitors until he's a monopolist again, at which point he may jack the prices up?

in the interim, he enjoys lower or negative profits and the consumers enjoy lower costs. After he jacks the prices, competitors move in again. A smart competitor will buy up the monopolists product at the low price and resell it to consumers. This actually happens. I know a guy who owns a lumber yard. His competitor was selling plywood below his wholesale cost. He bought his competitors entire inventory and resold it!



895. Post 5671034 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: aminorex on March 13, 2014, 03:56:49 AM
Perfect equality of opportunity can never exist, but it is very much in everyone's interest to seek to achieve a condition in which most gross inequities are removed, where possible, because this means fewer people want to cut your throat badly enough to actually do something about it.


I think I understand what you are saying, but I believe it is my duty as a father to giver my daughter every advantage possible, which is the opposite of equality of opportunity. But it's also my duty to ensure that she doesn't end up in the position of Anastasia Romanov.

And yes, that's very much what I did mean:  A rationally self-interested sort and degree of egalitarianism which anyone with adaptive cognitive traits adequate to survival can find some way to rationalize within their ideology.   Certainly equalizers which involve lifting all boats are much more in the vein of win-win than are equalizers which involve sinking all boats.

I might even go further personally, although I won't ask anyone else to do so:   I too try to give my daughter every reasonable advantage which will not corrupt her or rob someone else.  One of those advantages is the advantage of an example of -- dare I say it?  will the spectre of ayn rand come and suck all the green ink from my veins? -- altruistic behaviour, and its rewards in life.  By altruistic behaviour I do not mean pathological monomania. 

We are on the same page. Ayn Rand had some good ideas, but she seems to have forgotten sometimes that humans are social animals.



896. Post 5671149 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: arepo on March 13, 2014, 05:26:56 AM
I honestly and truly believe that almost all the inefficiencies can be attributed to meddling governments and political entrepreneurship of anti-competitive companies. I recognize this is a minority view, but I am prepared to argue it.

let's move this away from generalities, which are all well-hashed arguments on both sides, and focus on the specifics that we see in the global market today.

for instance, how is the poverty trap created by Walmart-esque wage suppression coupled with high unemployment rates attributable to governments?

High unemployment rates are solely the result of minimum wage laws and other government intervention. Every job hunter could get a job if he was willing to accept a wage that would allow his employer to profitably employ him, given his productivity level. Walmart wage suppression allows Walmart to pass the cost saving onto customers. There is no net harm to society. Some win. Some lose. Thems the breaks.


Quote
How is the large environmental externality of shipping and manufacturing attributable to governments?

We all either directly or indirectly benefit from these externalities. I once lived in a town with a pulp mill. We called that smog from the smokestacks the smell of money. When the mill closed down, 300 workers lost their jobs at the mill, another two thousand lost work because businesses closed that were supported by mill workers and I got to breath cleaner air and live in a ghost town. You may value clean air more than me and the enjoyment of neighbors less than me, but on average (judging by the way property values plummeted) most people don't.



897. Post 5671330 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: byronbb on March 13, 2014, 05:42:57 AM


The price has barely moved in nine hours. We have to talk about something.



898. Post 5671517 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 13, 2014, 06:14:23 AM

if robots are the foundation of society, then we should all benefit equally from them.

Says who? We didn't all benefit equally from the domestication of cows. Some people are lactose intolerant. I really don't understand this obsession with equality that is unheard of in nature. It's completely subjective. Equality in outcomes or equality in opportunity? Equal rewards for effort or for productivity? The former produce what economists call "perverse incentives". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perverse_incentive

You really should read this: http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html

ok, personally I dont like the word 'should' either. but you are proposing a system that must both destroy work (innovation) and create work (capitalism) at the same time. that is not an answer.

either we share work and hoard money, or we share money and hoard work. they work equally.

what doesnt work is when you hoard work and money - then the french revolution happens all over again and the skilled and educated lose.

Technology doesn't destroy work! Displaced autoworkers become robot builders and technicians and the pool boys at the gated communities of the wealthier GM executives and stockholders! That extra margin that automakers gain by automation is spent back into the economy. That provides jobs for service industry workers, etc. Would you rather be an assembly line worker with repetitive stress injuries or a golf caddy? I honestly don't think that you've thought this through.

..... technologies sole purpose is to destroy work.


I do NOT agree that technology is a sole purpose to destroy work.  We should NOT necessarily be hostile to technology. 

One of the central problems with technology, though is that frequently it is used to distract labor from unionization and solidarity and thereby the capitalists frequently become able to use and abuse technology in such a way that they extract nearly all of the surplus for themselves and use technology to divide and conquer, workers, labor and community.  In the end, workers become more and more exploited by this b/c frequently if there are NOT strong governments and/or strong unions, they are NOT allowed to reap(enjoy) the benefits of the technological innovations.

People who believe in no government and/or no unions also seem to believe in trickle down economics, as if giving the money to the capitalists and the rich, that some how, miraculously, that money will trickle down to the people and somehow suggesting that the capitalists deserve to take all the surplus value.. so they can be rainmakers.  Frequently, however, we have seen that trickle down does NOT work and there are failures to invest in infrastructure, and running away with the capital and even capitalists who engage in behavior to accumulate much more capital than they need or want... and the situation with these filthy rich is NO longer about the accumulation of capital but a form of keeping the capital away from the masses b/c they want to control and exploit the masses and they want to insist that capital is NOT distributed to regular people... b/c of desires to keep an exploitable group willing to work for anything..

Capitalists are savers. that's how they get capital. They should get rewards for delayed gratification and risk-taking. If they judge wrong and the market (which is society) doesn't value their goods or services at a price they can sustainably charge, then they lose money no matter how hard they worked. Entrepreneurs only get paid for results, not effort. They only get paid when they contribute. They are heroes.

Now in our modern system, entrepreneurs may not be savers. They may just have access to credit for arbitrary reasons. They may use the political system to shield themselves from competition. This is a total distortion of the free market and is not capitalism. You socialists like to use the political system to exploit capitalists, but that is not a better outcome. Consumers (and we are all consumers) get harmed because businesses must either charge higher prices to offset higher input costs or go out of business.

The only way to prevent either group from harming or exploiting the other is to remove the political factor and take the gun out of the room. When anything becomes mandatory or banned, somebody loses. When exchange of labor, money, goods or services is voluntary, both parties win. If they didn't, there would be no exchange.



899. Post 5671552 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: notme on March 13, 2014, 06:37:01 AM
So here is a stupid question to kill time: Suppose the Evil Lords decide to use the bitcoins seized from Silk Road and other places to kill bitcoin by spamming it with billions of tiny transactions, as fast as they can.  How would the network defend itself from that attack?

To stop legitimate transactions, they have to be willing to pay more in fees than the legitimate transaction senders.  If they are willing to pay more, there isn't much we can do but wait for them to run out of coins.

The harm to the network would be less than the cost to the spammers. It would be like fighting you by punching your fist with my face.



900. Post 5671633 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 13, 2014, 06:45:04 AM
So here is a stupid question to kill time: Suppose the Evil Lords decide to use the bitcoins seized from Silk Road and other places to kill bitcoin by spamming it with billions of tiny transactions, as fast as they can.  How would the network defend itself from that attack?


I am guessing, but I thought that the network just processes transactions in the order received, and if there is a fee attached, then those transactions are processed first. 

Billions is a lot... and I suppose that the problem could be made worse by creating some repetition of the transactions - after the first ones are processed, they are put back into the cue.

 If there are so many transactions that the network is overwhelmed... the network may go down for a period of time. and then maybe a fork in the code to restart?  YES>... I am continuing to guess.

You know you have an anti-fragile system when the worst thing your enemies can do is throw money at you.



901. Post 5671713 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 13, 2014, 06:54:02 AM


You have too many presumptions in your descriptions of events... and you are talking gobbledy gook.  First you praise and generalize about capitalists and then you suggest that the solution is to take away regulation.  That is all bullshit.  The problems that we have been having in recent times can be attributed too much liberty being given to capitalists and labor and government has been either too weak or too chickenshit to challenge the exploitation being carried out by capitalist.  Look at the situation created as recently as since 2008 whereby jobs have been removed to bust unions and to make people unemployed and to reintroduce jobs at fractions of the previous rates.  It was already bad before 2008, but got worse b/c capitalists (especially the filthy rich ones  - NOT talking about the mom and pop capitalists, here) were given too much freedom and NOT taxed and allowed to remove jobs and capital and NOT to reinvest. 

What planet are you living on? GM almost went out of business because the United auto-workers drove up input costs to the point that they could make no profits. Not small profits. NO PROFITS. Hummer and Oldsmobile had to be shut down because they just couldn't compete. Detroit is now a third world hellhole. Nonunion car factories are springing all over the south and the grandsons of the southerners who migrated to Detroit are migrating back.  You are not doing the laborers of the world any favors by driving their employers out of business. This has played out the same way in every heavily unionized industry on earth except for government workers.

I can guess what your solution will be: force every car maker to unionize. So then cars are too expensive to drive, workers get laid off anyway and we all have to ride the fucking bus to work, if we are lucky enough to have jobs at all. Can you even try to see yourself from our perspective? You appear crazy.



902. Post 5672011 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 13, 2014, 07:22:19 AM


You have too many presumptions in your descriptions of events... and you are talking gobbledy gook.  First you praise and generalize about capitalists and then you suggest that the solution is to take away regulation.  That is all bullshit.  The problems that we have been having in recent times can be attributed too much liberty being given to capitalists and labor and government has been either too weak or too chickenshit to challenge the exploitation being carried out by capitalist.  Look at the situation created as recently as since 2008 whereby jobs have been removed to bust unions and to make people unemployed and to reintroduce jobs at fractions of the previous rates.  It was already bad before 2008, but got worse b/c capitalists (especially the filthy rich ones  - NOT talking about the mom and pop capitalists, here) were given too much freedom and NOT taxed and allowed to remove jobs and capital and NOT to reinvest.  

What planet are you living on? GM almost went out of business because the United auto-workers drove up input costs to the point that they could make no profits. Not small profits. NO PROFITS. Hummer and Oldsmobile had to be shut down because they just couldn't compete. Detroit is now a third world hellhole. Nonunion car factories are springing all over the south and the grandsons of the southerners who migrated to Detroit are migrating back.  You are not doing the laborers of the world any favors by driving their employers out of business. This has played out the same way in every heavily unionized industry on earth except for government workers.

I can guess what your solution will be: force every car maker to unionize. So then cars are too expensive to drive, workers get laid off anyway and we all have to ride the fucking bus to work, if we are lucky enough to have jobs at all. Can you even try to see yourself from our perspective? You appear crazy.


First of all, it sounds as if you may have been watching too much Fox news, and you have a very narrow view of the situation (including the auto industry) which causes you to resort to personal attacks, and trying to attempt to assert that you have some kind of superior view of what is going on and that you are part of some enlightened group...  

Unions are NOT to blame for these supposed troubles that you attempt to describe.  For example, Germany is highly unionized, but they did NOT suffer the same troubles as the US in 2008 ish and thereafter, in part b/c of the unionization in Germany had input into the direction of the companies in germany and did NOT allow capitalists to vulturize companies to reduce jobs and wages and to paint some kind of fantasy land scenario that you describe.... about competition and that non-union is best and that we gotta be exploited in order to compete.. BS....

YES we already know your solution for nearly everything seems to be to get rid of government and to blame people, in spite of the fact that the wealthy have been extracting wealth from the people and NOT paying taxes and debilitating government in various ways....   which causes regular and poor people to have to bear more of the burden of what the rich should be contributing.   And the politicians have been going along with all of this  redistribution of wealth towards the rich... both parties have been going along with it... b/c there is too much money influencing politics and reducing the facilitation of democratic input.



nah, now you are just plappering the stuff the lobbyists want you to think. gm and co failed because they didn't adapt to the changing market, not because labor was too expensive. in fact, if they pay their workers a good loan, they will buy new cars instead of used ones and will buy them more often instead of driving them until they are worth only the scrap-metal price.

look at countries with real worker unions, eg. germany. didn't got the notion that they are completely inable to deal on an international scale and compete in both, prices and quality.

EXACTLY.....


Detroit car designs suck because all the smart engineers moved to Silicone Valley. German engineers didn't have that option. I wouldn't use Germany as a shining example of a worker's paradise if I were you. It's a place where they work year round to bail out Greeks and Italians who take summers off. They gave loans to other countries so that they could buy German cars and other products and now those countries are defaulting. That's not a good business model.

Their is no practical way to stop money from influencing politics. It has never been done anywhere, ever. We can only stop the influence OF politics. Capital is mobile and the rich will always flee to places where their property rights are protected. They don't like being slaves anymore than you do, and they have better options. Communism used to cover almost half the globe and now it's a backwater. This war has been fought and you lost. You never had a chance.



903. Post 5674623 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: dreamspark on March 13, 2014, 10:40:06 AM
I suppose this is their new exchange
https://atlasats.com/

Be skeptical to this atlasats thing. The MarketWatch "article" has the guy behind it bragging about their own network and blah blah. Meanwhile, it's hosted on Amazon EC2. Amazon EC2 is mostly used to host scams, spambots and that sort of thing. Anyone who runs a webserver will tell you that their logs are full of attack attempts from Amazon EC2, your best of putting a -j DROP on their entire IP-range.

In other news, Crayon Pop is about to release a new single: http://www.soompi.com/2014/03/12/crayon-pop-takes-off-helmet-and-dons-hanbok-for-upcoming-new-single/#.UyGHF3XZKXl

Are they for real? How can they expect to be taken seriously while hosting on EC2. Its so obvious as well their webpage takes forever to load.

look at their order book. Volume sucks. Traders need volume. That's why so many stayed with Gox even though they knew it was shitty. A new exchange is going to have to offer incentives to get high volume traders to switch. No fees for month or something like that. I won't take these guys seriously unless I see they are putting up som real money. I'm risking mine. They should risk theirs.



904. Post 5674841 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: niothor on March 13, 2014, 11:37:10 AM

I wouldn't use Germany as a shining example of a worker's paradise if I were you. It's a place where they work year round to bail out Greeks and Italians who take summers off.


billiyjoeallen, I wish your facts supported your bright rethoric.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/06/08/countries-most-vacation-days/2400193/

It's incredible how far this "northern Europe workers" vs "lazy Mediterraneans" lie has gone.

Disclosure: I'm Spanish.

From the article:
3. Germany
> GDP per capita: $30,028

4. Spain
> GDP per capita: $30,557

Doesn't quite match:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita

Hey, I didn't even mention Spain or the Mediterranean.  Don't be so quick to be offended, but now that you mention it, Spain has 26% unemployment and is in eminent danger of defaulting on its loans too.  The simple fact is that Germany can only sell it's admittedly well-made but expensive cars by extending credit to buyers who can't pay back the loans.



905. Post 5679768 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: octaft on March 13, 2014, 01:24:17 PM

A voluntary society cannot be designed at all. It will be emergent. When a critical mass of people realize that the rules we tell children to live by (namely don't hurt people, don't mess with their stuff, and keep your promises) should be applied across the board, and that no other general rules are necessary, then such a society will form.

There can be no formula for dealing with people in need. As soon as such a formula is known, most of the marginally needy and some of the non-needy attempt to game the system. Subsidizing poverty creates more poverty. The best way to deal with those in need is on an individual case-by-case basis. It's too important of a problem to be left to monopolists. Concrete answers are wrong answers.

Quote from: billyjoeallen
Killing and stealing only works until the productive people stop producing, and then everybody starves. The productive people started leaving South Africa in droves when the anti-capitalist Nelson Mendela took over. There's no place on earth with more natural resources per acre than South Africa. If people are starving there, then it's because the government killers and thieves created an environment hostile to peaceful trade.

Actual good rebuttal, but this assumes all will be rational and well-adjusted. The killers and stealers won't think like this (or won't care/won't have the skills needed to make it in the world), and people who refuse to live by the sword will not be able to allow themselves to starve if they can help it. If we both turn out to be right, you about killing and stealing losing efficacy over time, and me about killers and stealers doing killing and stealing anyway, that's a potential huge blow for your ideal. Having your reasonable people inevitably starved to death at the hand of greedy murderers and thieves is a likely death knell.

Personally, I'd rather people game the system by collecting more food stamps than they are legally allowed, rather then having them just straight up try to blow my brains out and take all my stuff. While I wish we could deal with them on a case by case basis, under the current system I think that would cost more than the money saved by catching fraud. If you think the ability and cost-effectiveness of doing this would be improved in your ideal world, or even if you think there is a way to improve it under the current system, I'd be very interested in hearing about that.


Unfortunately I don't think meaningful improvement is possible under the current system. This is one reason why I am a revolutionary. I see a fundamental weakness in monopoly government that cannot be corrected without allowing distributed competitive governance.

There is no easy solution to the problems in South Africa. I see the best case scenario a hopefully temporary reversion to tribalism. If I lived there, I would leave if I could and retreat to an area controlled by my tribe if I couldn't, hunker down and ride out the storm. It is likely to get much much worse before it gets better.



906. Post 5679866 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: octaft on March 13, 2014, 05:13:03 PM
People that say stuff like this sound like they subscribe to the Just World fallacy, for this case specifically that every problem someone has stems from themselves, and that you can't possibly be struggling if you're working hard. It's a lie some people tell themselves to make them feel better, usually out of either a fear of it happening to them, believing that it cannot happen to them, or believing that since it has never happened to them, the poor must be doing something wrong. Every ex-CEO probably subscribed to that theory until they had to start delivering pizzas.

Either that, or you have a heavy and unwarranted disdain for poor people, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

You don't need to subscribe to the just world fallacy, nor have a disdain for poor people to want to abolish government involvement in social security. You might be of the opinion (as I am), that social security would probably better be handled if the government wasn't involved. Private individuals would have more disposable wealth to share with others, if the government would refrain from taking half of their income for starters.

Like you describe the just world fallacy as an attempt to come to terms with ones own (presumably comparatively well-off) situation compared to the situation lots of poor people find themselves in. The same thing can be said about wanting the government to take care of social security. That way when you walk down the street and see a beggar in torn clothes you can think to yourself that it is none of your business. It's the job of somebody else to take care of this problem - we have experts for that. Relying on government (or other institutions for that matter) to take care of the poor shows more disdain for them than advocating the stance that we are all responsible on an individual level. And if you are OK with living in a world with lots of poor people - fine then. But if you're not, don't stand around crying for somebody to do something. Inevitably some politician will hear your cry and do "something" and we all find ourselves wishing he hadn't done anything Cheesy At least give that beggar a dollar yourself or treat him to lunch or a haircut or whatever. Give him the feeling that he is a human being, too! That's what people need the most anyway. A bureaucrat won't give him that.

I think we've determined already that you have far more faith in humanity than I do, and it shows. Yes, private individuals would have more wealth to share, but would they? I am of the opinion that it's human nature to horde and be greedy, and from the tone of your post and others, I'm sure you disagree. You sound like a really nice guy, but take care not to too readily project that onto others. As for WHO takes care of social security and welfare, I don't care who it is, as long as it's done. The government sucks and is probably quite inefficient, but how else are we going to do it? You can't take away something without offering either a reason for why it shouldn't be done (which some of you have. I disagree with most of those reasons, but some of you have), or with a suitable replacement.

The Just World fallacy is not an attempt to "come to terms" with anything, really. It is primarily a state of denial and emotional self-protection. It hurts us to see people suffer, so if we can convince ourselves that it was their fault, and that it can't happen to us because we work hard or whatever, it somehow makes it feel better, or just. If you wanted to make a proper analogy, if I were to see that homeless man and say "get a fucking job, you bum, if you had any skills or cared about yourself, you wouldn't need to mooch" without ever stopping to consider how he got into that situation, that would be a much better example of the Just World fallacy. Based on what I've argued so far, does this sound like anything I would ever say about someone in need?

As for giving him the feeling that he is a human being, too, man you are a really nice guy (no sarcasm). It is true that good feelings help people get through the tough times, but all the goodwill in the world won't feed you. I never give money, they get food or nothing. I have no idea what they will spend my money on. After all, I'm not naive enough to believe that everyone in hard times got there despite hard work, some people really are just incorrigible fuckups, just not as many as you might be led to believe. When I give food, unless they can find someone who wants to buy a sandwich from a homeless man, all he can do is eat it.

For the record, maybe you're just pulling the wool over my eyes, but you don't seem to be anywhere near the "disdain" category. I do think a lot of you are in the "misconception" category, though.

If your negative view of human nature extends to politicians and bureaucrats, then you should logically be as opposed to monopoly government as I am.



907. Post 5680151 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: octaft on March 13, 2014, 03:21:10 PM

Frankly I would not want those people working for me.  I think everyone is better off if they are bribed into staying out of the workforce.  The reason is the same as the reason why the argument that market-based minimum wage is better than mandated is so bogus:  Lots of people have negative productivity.  No matter how hard they try, they will do more damage than good.  GHWBush, and BObama for example.  Would you want either of them making you a coffee?  Blech.


Problem is, if you pay them not to work, all there is to do is stay home and breed. And now you have five people to take care of instead of two.

People that say stuff like this sound like they subscribe to the Just World fallacy, for this case specifically that every problem someone has stems from themselves, and that you can't possibly be struggling if you're working hard. It's a lie some people tell themselves to make them feel better, usually out of either a fear of it happening to them, believing that it cannot happen to them, or believing that since it has never happened to them, the poor must be doing something wrong. Every ex-CEO probably subscribed to that theory until they had to start delivering pizzas.

Either that, or you have a heavy and unwarranted disdain for poor people, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

I don't have to have a disdain for the poor to understand that vilifying capitalists is not the way to gain/retain the capital needed for economic growth. The labor theory of value has been discredited. The subjective theory of value and marginal utility have much more explanatory and predictive power. Update your economic model.



908. Post 5680417 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: threecats on March 13, 2014, 06:09:23 PM
Damn, all this philosophy in last 10-15 pages makes this thread boring  Grin

I could make ChartBuddy repost "Favourite charts from the booms and busts of 2013" if you'd like Cheesy

Chartbuddy's Greatest Hits. I like it.

Beats recent discussion on issue number one that never goes anywhere on public forums: political philosophy. Number two is religion.

gotta say i am impressed with our forum though, it has been about ten pages of this argument and Hitler has not been mention yet, correct? what's that fundemental rule of internet forums, all arguments eventually devolve into invoking of hitler?  but not here. : -)

Aminorex mentioned the encirclement and rapprochement with Switzerland by the Nazis. Godwin's Law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law remains intact!



909. Post 5680625 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 13, 2014, 06:25:27 PM

A voluntary society cannot be designed at all. It will be emergent. When a critical mass of people realize that the rules we tell children to live by (namely don't hurt people, don't mess with their stuff, and keep your promises) should be applied across the board, and that no other general rules are necessary, then such a society will form.

There can be no formula for dealing with people in need. As soon as such a formula is known, most of the marginally needy and some of the non-needy attempt to game the system. Subsidizing poverty creates more poverty. The best way to deal with those in need is on an individual case-by-case basis. It's too important of a problem to be left to monopolists. Concrete answers are wrong answers.

Quote from: billyjoeallen
Killing and stealing only works until the productive people stop producing, and then everybody starves. The productive people started leaving South Africa in droves when the anti-capitalist Nelson Mendela took over. There's no place on earth with more natural resources per acre than South Africa. If people are starving there, then it's because the government killers and thieves created an environment hostile to peaceful trade.

Actual good rebuttal, but this assumes all will be rational and well-adjusted. The killers and stealers won't think like this (or won't care/won't have the skills needed to make it in the world), and people who refuse to live by the sword will not be able to allow themselves to starve if they can help it. If we both turn out to be right, you about killing and stealing losing efficacy over time, and me about killers and stealers doing killing and stealing anyway, that's a potential huge blow for your ideal. Having your reasonable people inevitably starved to death at the hand of greedy murderers and thieves is a likely death knell.

Personally, I'd rather people game the system by collecting more food stamps than they are legally allowed, rather then having them just straight up try to blow my brains out and take all my stuff. While I wish we could deal with them on a case by case basis, under the current system I think that would cost more than the money saved by catching fraud. If you think the ability and cost-effectiveness of doing this would be improved in your ideal world, or even if you think there is a way to improve it under the current system, I'd be very interested in hearing about that.


Unfortunately I don't think meaningful improvement is possible under the current system. This is one reason why I am a revolutionary. I see a fundamental weakness in monopoly government that cannot be corrected without allowing distributed competitive governance.

There is no easy solution to the problems in South Africa. I see the best case scenario a hopefully temporary reversion to tribalism. If I lived there, I would leave if I could and retreat to an area controlled by my tribe if I couldn't, hunker down and ride out the storm. It is likely to get much much worse before it gets better.

I would hate to live in the experimental society that you would design after the supposed revolution....

From my reading your various posts on the topic of your vision of what society should be, your society would likely be a very dog eat dog world with a lot of holes and loop holes that do NOT provide for the public to benefit from the public goods.. and probably would NOT adequately protect public goods.... unless of course, after the revolution, your side is able to slim the population down by 80% or more.  

I simply want to live in a society where all interactions are voluntary and property rights are respected. If that sounds too distopian to you, find comfort in the fact that I am philosophically am opposed to forcing anyone to create such a society, to live there or to stay there. Can you the the same of your society?



910. Post 5680878 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 13, 2014, 06:33:04 PM


I don't have to have a disdain for the poor to understand that vilifying capitalists is not the way to gain/retain the capital needed for economic growth. The labor theory of value has been discredited. The subjective theory of value and marginal utility have much more explanatory and predictive power. Update your economic model.

Yeah.  Give them all nice sounding names, and that will help....

NOT....      

You need more substance, facts, rather than merely having a nice sounding name and a vision that is NOT based in reality.

I didn't give them nice sounding names,  William Stanley Jevons, Léon Walras, and Carl Menger did over a hundred years ago. It's weird how several different people can independently and nearly simultaneously discover something so supposedly unbased in reality. The same thing happened with calculus. Maybe that's not based in reality either.



911. Post 5681452 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 13, 2014, 06:55:11 PM


I simply want to live in a society where all interactions are voluntary and property rights are respected. If that sounds too distopian to you, find comfort in the fact that I am philosophically am opposed to forcing anyone to create such a society, to live there or to stay there. Can you the the same of your society?


Those are very nice and lofty principles in theory, and they are NOT even bad things to which to aspire.  NONETHELESS, we are likely NOT going to be able to achieve complete voluntaryism, especially your concept of the term, and there are social and public benefit and social and public property that are from time to time going to impinge upon the boundaries and property rights of others that are NOT likely resolvable voluntarily.   But, in theory I would like a world that also aspires to those kinds of broad principles, to the extent feasible.. so maybe we kind of agree to the broad principles, but NOT to the absolutism of such broad principles to the detriment of society as a whole.


The debate might end here, then. There are several strong utilitarian arguments to be made in favor of distributed governance, but I'm probably not the right person to make them. I'm a Natural Rights kind of guy and I don't think coercion is justified even if it produced a net benefit for society, which I strongly believe it doesn't.

Our community just donated over $25,000 worth of bitcoin to a victim of irresponsible media. Is that not evidence of our charitable disposition?



912. Post 5681571 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: Zapffe on March 13, 2014, 07:30:54 PM
Scotty didn't know!


Never? The whale that took us to $710 paid my mortgage and bills for the whole month.



913. Post 5681742 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on March 13, 2014, 07:06:09 PM

I would hate to live in the experimental society that you would design after the supposed revolution....


You kind missed the point again. He doesn't want to design a society. That's what statists want to do.

This time it can happen, history has favored the plunder, now for the first time there is a plunder proof store of wealth if you store it properly, if it is stolen it rewords all others not the plunderers.


Bitcoin is NOT going to resolve all of these societal and community questions b/c they are still going to exist; however, bitcoin will likely bring some revolutionary possibilities in the way that we think about our social institutions and how we think about and carry out social interactions.


I agree Bitcoin wont solve a thing, its people who will solve the problems, Bitcoin is just a useful tool, a unique and powerful tool people have never had before.

Bitcoin solves the Byzantine General's problem. A problem is a thing.



914. Post 5682172 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 13, 2014, 07:56:20 PM


I simply want to live in a society where all interactions are voluntary and property rights are respected. If that sounds too distopian to you, find comfort in the fact that I am philosophically am opposed to forcing anyone to create such a society, to live there or to stay there. Can you the the same of your society?


Those are very nice and lofty principles in theory, and they are NOT even bad things to which to aspire.  NONETHELESS, we are likely NOT going to be able to achieve complete voluntaryism, especially your concept of the term, and there are social and public benefit and social and public property that are from time to time going to impinge upon the boundaries and property rights of others that are NOT likely resolvable voluntarily.   But, in theory I would like a world that also aspires to those kinds of broad principles, to the extent feasible.. so maybe we kind of agree to the broad principles, but NOT to the absolutism of such broad principles to the detriment of society as a whole.


The debate might end here, then. There are several strong utilitarian arguments to be made in favor of distributed governance, but I'm probably not the right person to make them. I'm a Natural Rights kind of guy and I don't think coercion is justified even if it produced a net benefit for society, which I strongly believe it doesn't.

Our community just donated over $25,000 worth of bitcoin to a victim of irresponsible media. Is that not evidence of our charitable disposition?


You cannot run a society like that.... this situation got a lot of attention, but there are so many situations of public need that do NOT get attention, and the problem of free riding or free loading is a well known principle in economics and human psychology that people are NOT going to just freely invest in certain public goods, and they are just going to wait for the other guy... b/c they know that they can get it for free.. there are so many examples of this and even examples of natural monopolies that it is very inefficient to build redundant systems.. and those kinds of systems are public goods.     I think a lot of you anti-government folks do NOT account for these various factors, and somehow expect that everything important is going to be covered by some kind of hands-off voluntary/free/individualistic system.

I don't want to run a society. I want it to run without anyone running it. Kind of like Bitcoin. Free riders are not the primary issue to the truly altruistic. The main issue is "are the needs of the helpless being met?"   



915. Post 5682671 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: Tyson95 on March 13, 2014, 08:37:14 PM
Atlas Ceo on fox business
he said 1000s of signups yesterday

Why would people want to use a Mon-Fri 9-5 exchange? I don't see any extra services that would make me want to trade there unless i'm missing something.

If you are a seller, you go where the buyers are. Wall Street has money, and if that money finds it's way onto the bid side of the Atlas order book, My BTC will find it's way to the ask side. That's a big "if" at this point, though.



916. Post 5683591 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 13, 2014, 09:02:12 PM
I haven't got a PhD in computer science, however, I came to realize that bitcoin is so fascinating, that one has to be a fool to neglect the consequences that arise from this technology.

My knowledge of programming and computer science may be limited, but one must be quite narrow minded not to see the broader picture here.

[ ... ]

I for one believe that bitcoin is something much grander than we can even comprehend right now.

As humanity makes the transition from a type 0 civilization (the most primitive type of a civilization on the Kardashev scale) to a planetary civilization, bitcoin could indeed mark a step towards a global economy. Everything becomes globalized and digitalized, so why not currency? Bitcoin is a normal step towards a digitalized world economy.

As I wrote many times, I have no doubts about the technical aspects of cryptographic currency; and if it succeeds at its basic original goal --- a cheap, fast, relatively uncomplicated method for internet payments, especially across borders -- I would be most happy, and certainly will use it.

However, I am more than a bit skeptical about its chances of success; not for technical reasons, but for several economical and political problems that I have yet to see adequately answered.  But I have already written about them, and they are not the point here.

I also have a very strong and negative opinion about *bitcoin as an investment*, a topic which is completely distinct from that original goal. But I have already written about that too, and it would be pointless to repeat it here.

I resent this recurrent implication that anyone who does not adore bitcoin must be very stupid, stubborn, or have hidden motives.  If anyone is clinging to old beliefs, it is the bitcoiners who still claim that "governments cannot stop bitcoin",  altcoins are not viable because of the "network effect" and "first-player advantage", "bitcoin will be extremely valuable because of its limited supply", and so on.  Bitcoiners could be forgiven for believing those claims a year ago, but the facts now have categorically disproved them.

In particular, I cannot understand why some bitcoiners still believe that crypto-currency in general, and bitcoin in particular, will free them from governments or banks.  If that is what you expect from bitcoin, prepare to be severely disappointed.  Governments can render cyptocurrencies useless with a single stroke of the pen; we saw that happen in China and other countries.

More generally, one cannot expect that a technological invention, by itself, will bring fundamental social, political or economic change.  The people whose wealth and power could be threatened by such change will fight it, with all the resources that their wealth and power gives them.  In particular, technology cannot give to the people of a country any freedoms that their government is denying them.

GPS made a big difference in travel and other fields; Google made information vastly more accessible; Wikipedia put old encyclopedias out of business; and so on -- but none of those inventions changed society in a fundamental way (like, say, the French Revolution, World War II, or the end of Apartheid did).   If anything, technological advances only strengthen the existing power structures.  Big social/political problems can be solved only with lots of social/political action.  With luck, crypto-currencies may have similar impact as those technologies -- but they will have the same limitations.

Then there is the question of the bitcoin "ecosystem", the people and businesses that have collectively taken possession of the technology and/or are exploting it.  Sure, in theory bitcoin is a pure abstract concept that is not affected by them; but in practice, for the common people, the word "bitcoin" includes Silk Road, a couple dozen still-unpunished scams (like MtGOX and BitcoinRain), the salesmen who claim that bitcoin is a good hedge against inflation, and much more.   It is hard to love the bitcoin skeleton when the meat around it is so rotten...

(For example, several hundred thousand bitcoins are now owned by the MtGOX thief, and there seems to be little hope or will to identify that thief and return the coins to their rightful owners.  If bitcoin were to succeed as bitcoiners hope, that thief would own several percent of all the money supply in the world.  You expect me to root for that?)

I've got a PhD in theoretical physics [ ... ]

Well, that may explain it:  I understand that to do theoretical physics these days one must learn to suspend one's skepticism first.  Wink  By the way, the last time I made a bet with someone, I won a pizza and a bear beer from a theoretical physicist who was absolutely sure that the OPERA results were correct.  Grin


You want to bet a pizza and a beer that bitcoin will be at a higher price level a year from now and therefore prove to be a good store of value, investment and hedge on inflation?  Name your time frame.  Name your toppings. I think you'll be eating crow.



917. Post 5688880 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 13, 2014, 11:49:17 PM

You have a clever way of pointing at technicalities such as you do NOT want to "run a society."  Who gives a flying fuck whether a person uses the word run or  that the society is running on its own...

Ultimately, the point that I am making is that in the real world apart from your fantasy land of generalities (that supposedly is shared by others with similar visions of grandeur), the societal objectives are NOT going to be met.  ... and net happiness will be down.. even thou some people may feel free an empowered by such a vague societal outline.... b/c supposed individualized liberty will be embraced and respected...   Your whole outline seems much to vague.


And face the reality... you cannot "meet the needs of the helpless" without having various plans that outline such rather than relying on some amorphous concepts of voluntary giving...... and I am quite confident that the helpless will be a much broader category than you are contemplating in your vague outline of principles.

Is this less vague?
System A: 60% of the people vote for a 10% tax to help the needy. Tax collection and funds distribution is 50% efficient so the poor get 5% of society's income.
System B: 60% of the people voluntarily donate 10% to help the needy directly and the poor get 6% of society's income.

The poor are better off under system B but I suspect this is unacceptable to you because helping the poor is less important to you than forcing everyone to conform to your values.



918. Post 5689732 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 14, 2014, 06:53:24 AM


You seem to be assuming that voluntary is more efficient and you seem to be assuming voluntary results in a higher contributions through some kind of adequate participation rate. 

Obviously voluntary contributions are more efficient because people resist being forced to do stuff. They evade, avoid, run, hide, and fight back. Monopoly welfare providers also face no competitive pressure to be efficient.

If participation is inadequate, we have two options: I prefer persuasion and you chose coercion. The danger with coercion is that the coercive mechanisms remain in place and can be used for socially harmful as well as socially beneficial ends.  Taxes fund war, graft, secret police, etc.



919. Post 5690271 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 14, 2014, 08:11:54 AM
 Having mandatory, is NOT the same as coercion.. b/c a large majority of the people do NOT need to be coerced to follow rules of their own making and a society of their own choosing and a community in which they chose to live... I would NOT call that coercion.  

If I resist paying taxes, the government intervenes with the threat of force. Threat of force is the very definition of coercion.

If people are really choosing to make rules to provide welfare, then they can skip the intermediate step and chose to provide welfare. Everything else is coercion.




920. Post 5700376 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 14, 2014, 03:23:02 PM
 Having mandatory, is NOT the same as coercion.. b/c a large majority of the people do NOT need to be coerced to follow rules of their own making and a society of their own choosing and a community in which they chose to live... I would NOT call that coercion.  

If I resist paying taxes, the government intervenes with the threat of force. Threat of force is the very definition of coercion.

If people are really choosing to make rules to provide welfare, then they can skip the intermediate step and chose to provide welfare. Everything else is coercion.



That is why this back and forth communication with you is getting NO WHERE - b/c you keep insisting that your being part of a community is coercion... and you give way too much weight to this coercion aspect - to the extent that taxes are mandatory and a part of civil society, and almost anywhere in the world has some taxes.. though there is variation.  If you are an American (or another western country), you have won the lottery, b/c you can move almost anywhere in the world with your passport and find some haven that has little to no taxes.  What country are you from?   You seem to want the benefits of being part of a community, but you do NOT want to pay into that community's rate of taxation.


There is a difference between not wanting to pay and not wanting to be forced to pay. You don't have to agree with me to understand that many people resist being controlled regardless of who is doing the controlling or why. YOu have no evidence that I don't want to contribute to society. Your assumptions I suspect are based on projection. It's YOU who doesn't want to contribute unless everybody else pays their "fair" share with you determining what's fair.



921. Post 5731409 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 16, 2014, 04:57:02 PM
Is it my impression, or has there been a general clamp-down on discussion and analysis of the MtGOX heist and its leaked database?  Tongue

It's just your impression and, more generally, the impression of Bitcoin bears.

People who have a predisposed opinion that Bitcoin is a bound-to-fail concept thought that the failure of Mt.Gox was proof that they were right. They assumed that Bitcoin would have gone to zero by now and that we would all be constantly talking about it.

People who are optimistic about Bitcoin's future don't find the Mt.Gox drama that interesting.

As the bitcoin bulls say, MtGOX is MtGOX, and bitcoin is bitcoin.  The coin will succeed or fail no matter what the bears think.

But the fact that the "bitcoin community" does not want to know what happened inside MtGOX, to me, means that the MtGOX scam was not confined to Karpeles and the hypothetical hacker.  Shouldn't investors be interested to know whether other prominent bitcoin businessmen are involved?

What is wrong with you?  I think your cynical view of people is psychological projection. Yes, there are bad actors and yes the scandal may implicate other players. We do want to know what happened but we're burnt out on this story. You on the other hand can barely conceal your glee that this tragedy happened and your hope that the damage spreads as wide as possible. You dwell on the negative always. You are a sorry little man. Does anybody like you?



922. Post 5731453 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: octaft on March 16, 2014, 05:46:26 PM
I love beer, its the last day of spring break, and i'm already 10 deep into killing 48 bud lights today.

does not compute  Huh

He likes beer so much, he even drinks beer-flavored water. That's hardcore, man.

LOL.



923. Post 5736632 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 16, 2014, 07:06:41 PM
Yes, there are bad actors and yes the scandal may implicate other players. We do want to know what happened but we're burnt out on this story. [ ... ] You dwell on the negative always.

Whatever happened at MtGOX, it is certain that some 500,000 BTC now belong to a thief or scammer.  Added to other scams and thefts, known and unknown, it may be that more than 1 million BTC now belong to bitcoin criminals.  If those people go unpunished and get to keep their bitcoins, such crimes will not stop with MtGOX.

So, if bitcoin succeeds like his most ardent fans believe, perhaps 10% of all the money supply in the world will belong to criminals.  You want me to root for that?  Angry

AS opposed to now when most of the money supply is controlled by (war) criminals?



924. Post 5737607 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: Ivanhoe on March 16, 2014, 11:24:07 PM
Who thinks the situation in Ukraine will spark something in the bitcoin price?

To date, none of the so-called "pariah" states have utilized Bitcoin to evade sanctions to any significant degree. I don't know why. Russia may be different, but judging by the statement of its central bank, I think it unlikely. My guess is that bitcoin will trail gold price increases for a while before surpassing them.



925. Post 5740486 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on March 17, 2014, 05:29:12 AM
Who thinks the situation in Ukraine will spark something in the bitcoin price?

Do you think the Ukranians have the infrastructure to use bitcoin in times of war? I dont, I dont think it will be useful in war. However, there may be a few millionaires/billionaires in Ukraine or Russia that want to protect/hedge their fortunes. but why haven't they already done so?

Because it only has gone down over the last few months. That in combination with nothing but scams, hackers and crooks and no sane, rich person would put his money in Bitcoin. Not exactly rocket science.

Nailed it!

A sane rich guy would put his money in whatever asset was resistant to seizure if seizure was his primary concern.



926. Post 5741153 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on March 17, 2014, 07:18:31 AM
NewsWeak may want to prepare for reaming:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/20m07a/statement_from_dorian_satoshi_nakamoto/

"NewsWeak" is right. Their whole story was circumstantial. The smoking gun was an admission that can be explained as miscommunication by a guy that didn't want to talk in the first place. At this point, I wouldn't even call it a weak case. More of a theory. Dorian has a civil case and I hope this results in a retraction or a settlement. Without more evidence, it's likely he'll get it.




927. Post 5741632 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: seriouscoin on March 17, 2014, 08:02:02 AM

"NewsWeak" is right. Their whole story was circumstantial. The smoking gun was an admission that can be explained as miscommunication by a guy that didn't want to talk in the first place. At this point, I wouldn't even call it a weak case. More of a theory. Dorian has a civil case and I hope this results in a retraction or a settlement. Without more evidence, it's likely he'll get it.




So if i "misunderstood" you as an anti gay dick head whos doing some work for an antigay organization, then i wrote an article about you and how your childhood's insecurities with homosexual (your parents are gay couple...for ex) would be a perfect fit...... I'm still right ....... RITE?
 Roll Eyes

?? Your analogy makes no sense. This was an irresponsible story by Newsweek even if it later turns out to be true, which is doubtful. This doesn't mean they made it up or intentionally framed the wrong guy.



928. Post 5741995 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: TERA on March 17, 2014, 09:09:56 AM
I think we will see 560 in the next 24 hours. if this is the sale of stolen coins, we could see lower. his is a natural 3 wave decline, and should pass wave A extreme (590)
The 24h volume on bitstamp is still only 4705btc. If stolen coins were actually being sold, then you would start to see 6 digit volume numbers. Keep in mind also that over 3600 coins are mined per day. This obviously isn't stolen coins.  This is a different problem. It's called "nobody is buying".

I agree and I think it likely that many stolen coins were sold long ago, and kept prices depressed.

There are macroeconomic factors in play also. Relatively less money printing by the central bank, uncertainty on the Ukraine situation, lower wealth effect due to stock market pullback, etc.



929. Post 5742067 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: surfer43 on March 17, 2014, 09:22:40 AM
If someone buys up to 640, we would be on our way up. People with a stake: buy more or people will start to panic sell as the price gradually slips away

How about I wait until after the panic and get my coins cheaper? The long term value of my stake is determined by fundamentals, not technicals.



930. Post 5753675 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

What the hell happened to this dip/crash/panic/slide that everyone was predicting? I got fresh fiat waiting to pickup some cheap coins. Thinking about accumulating a long position in green beer.



931. Post 5754234 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: hdbuck on March 17, 2014, 10:49:13 PM
heheh gotta love that.   Cheesy



-> http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-17/global-death-cross-just-got-deathier


it's cuz Wall Street knows that if equity prices fall too much that the Fed will crank up the printing presses again. Stocks may be overpriced, but dollars are even more overpriced.



932. Post 5758235 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Buy when everybody is pessimistic.



933. Post 5758369 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: byronbb on March 18, 2014, 05:03:46 AM
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.

We might not be there yet but it's close.

How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN.

We've been through so many of these rally/corrections that we've learned to front-run the cycle, so it won't go that far down. It always seems different this time but in hindsight it's not.



934. Post 5758394 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

oh noz, Bitcoin is only 51% higher than it was three weeks ago- everybody panic!



935. Post 5758432 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 18, 2014, 05:15:32 AM
oh noz, Bitcoin is only 51% higher than it was three weeks ago- everybody panic!

big green candle, somebody didn't get the panic memo. Wink



936. Post 5758517 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on March 18, 2014, 05:19:55 AM
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.

We might not be there yet but it's close.

I'm still living in Bitcoin euphoria, since the CFR took an interest in Bitcoin only 2 of the 4 big predictions have come to pass.
1) the collapse and or outlawing of key exchanges
2) the arrests of known Bitcoin personalities
3) a media smear camping demonising Bitcoin.
4) a collapse in the price. (I'm still coming to terms with Bitcoin leaving double digits)

To be honest the only thing that can collapse the price IMO are the week hands, (non believers) stolen Bitcoin and whales redistributing/ facilitating future wealth growth, and  I think a lot of coins @ the new order of magnetude have already been flushed.

I welcome a drop but if it happens it may take time or if it is quick it will kick some new big players in the balls, if it happens.

Big players aren't just traders and they're not putting all their eggs in one basket. Us old hodlers have learned not to panic and newbies with millions have no reason to.



937. Post 5759199 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: TERA on March 18, 2014, 06:08:02 AM
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.

We might not be there yet but it's close.

How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN.

We've been through so many of these rally/corrections that we've learned to front-run the cycle, so it won't go that far down. It always seems different this time but in hindsight it's not.
or... the people who are front-running the "cycle" (which is an imaginary thing actually) are the only reason the price is as high as it is now, and this is just a dead cat bounce before it goes down again.

Dead cat bounce speculation is part of the cycle too. If Bitcoin was going to fail for any reason other than a superior technology rendering it obsolete, it would have failed by now. Anything else only delays without preventing the next ramp. Chinese and Russian hostility to crypto will have the effect of causing western policy makers to support it. The enemy of my enemy and all that.



938. Post 5759288 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: TERA on March 18, 2014, 06:30:45 AM
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.

We might not be there yet but it's close.

How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN.

We've been through so many of these rally/corrections that we've learned to front-run the cycle, so it won't go that far down. It always seems different this time but in hindsight it's not.
or... the people who are front-running the "cycle" (which is an imaginary thing actually) are the only reason the price is as high as it is now, and this is just a dead cat bounce before it goes down again.

Dead cat bounce speculation is part of the cycle too. If Bitcoin was going to fail for any reason other than a superior technology rendering it obsolete, it would have failed by now. Anything else only delays without preventing the next ramp. Chinese and Russian hostility to crypto will have the effect of causing western policy makers to support it. The enemy of my enemy and all that.
Bitcoin doesn't need to "fail" for it to be grossly overpriced by speculators and for the speculation bubble to deflate. Refer to 2011. Think of it as a "supercycle".

The 2011 bubble saw an increase from 10 cents to 32 dollars! Proportionally speaking, the 18 month consolidation period before the next rally roughly equates to a consolidation period of about three to five months after a ramp from ~$150 to $1163. We are right on schedule.  



939. Post 5759469 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: TERA on March 18, 2014, 06:40:09 AM
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.

We might not be there yet but it's close.

How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN.

We've been through so many of these rally/corrections that we've learned to front-run the cycle, so it won't go that far down. It always seems different this time but in hindsight it's not.
or... the people who are front-running the "cycle" (which is an imaginary thing actually) are the only reason the price is as high as it is now, and this is just a dead cat bounce before it goes down again.

Dead cat bounce speculation is part of the cycle too. If Bitcoin was going to fail for any reason other than a superior technology rendering it obsolete, it would have failed by now. Anything else only delays without preventing the next ramp. Chinese and Russian hostility to crypto will have the effect of causing western policy makers to support it. The enemy of my enemy and all that.
Bitcoin doesn't need to "fail" for it to be grossly overpriced by speculators and for the speculation bubble to deflate. Refer to 2011. Think of it as a "supercycle".

The 2011 bubble saw an increase from 10 cents to 32 dollars! Proportionally speaking, the 18 month consolidation period before the next rally roughly equates to a three month consolidation period of about three to five months after a ramp from ~$150 to $1163. We are right on schedule.  

What if the ramp was not from $150 to $1163, but from $15 to $1163, and there were 5 months in 2013 as an "intermission".

$32 is 320X $0.10  $1163 is 77.5X $15, so the wait until the next ATH should be only ~1/4th as long.



940. Post 5759796 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 18, 2014, 07:17:18 AM
To be honest the only thing that can collapse the price IMO are the week hands, (non believers) stolen Bitcoin and whales redistributing/ facilitating future wealth growth, and  I think a lot of coins @ the new order of magnetude have already been flushed.


The big question for me is "what really happened to the Gox coins."  I'm working on the hypothesis that the coins were stolen along time ago and have already been absorbed by the market.  If this is true, I can't see us dipping very deep and in fact think this is quite bullish medium term.  On the other hand, if a thief really has 750,000 BTC, I could imagine considerable selling pressure for some time.  


The first part of your theme seems possible........... but likely NOT complete b/c in my thinking it would take considerable time for 750k btc to be absorbed completely into the market.  The second alternative seems even less possible b/c it seems very unlikely (though possible) that the stealing would have ONLY been by one thief.

If the coins were originally stolen in the 2011 Goxhack, then it did take a long time to absorb them into the market. A year and a half before the next ATH.



941. Post 5769401 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: threecats on March 18, 2014, 09:49:20 AM
LTC is closer to thread than the twenty pages of philisophical ranting about the true nature of man ...

The true nature of man is irrelevant. If man is basically good, then no monopoly government is necessary. If Man is basically evil, then a monopoly government is too dangerous, because politicians, bureaucrats and cops are men too.  



942. Post 5771988 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 18, 2014, 07:14:59 PM
LTC is closer to thread than the twenty pages of philisophical ranting about the true nature of man ...

The true nature of man is irrelevant. If man is basically good, then no monopoly government is necessary. If Man is basically evil, then a monopoly government is too dangerous, because politicians, bureaucrats and cops are men too.  


Even though the nature of man was somewhat woven into parts of our more than 50 scattered pages of discussion of such topics, nature of man was NOT really the essence of the side track... if we should call it a side track....   I think that we were mostly focused around the extent to which government is necessary in a future society which hinged upon questions regarding whether government served any meaningful purpose that would justify receiving taxes whether voluntarily or by force.  Surely, some posters were weaving in other topics as well and even deviating from the deviation... and possibly even I was guilty of such..... especially when from time to time my own human nature was put into question... ... Smiley.......... It's all good, no? 

We both agree that governance is necessary. It's your conflation of governance with monopoly government that is the sticking point. Just using the phrase "the extent to which (monopoly) government is necessary" indicates that you don't quite understand my position, even enough to disagree with it. Competing market participants can provide all the services a monopoly can provide and do so for less costs and no coercion. The one thing they can't do is coerce their customers into paying for things they may not want or need. I argue this makes competitive distributed governance a better choice. You argue this makes it a worse one.

As to your nature, I assume that you are arguing in good faith. I wouldn't waste my time otherwise. What concerns me is that you are advocating using threat of force against me for my own good. This is as ludicrous as if I argued that I should rape your sister for her own good. It doesn't matter how good of a mating prospect I am or what her other options are. It's not my decision to make. Similarly, it doesn't matter if monopoly governments made us all infinitely richer, safer or happier. If they don't make us more free, they are not worth having.

A government that doesn't allow competition for governance must believe that it couldn't compete in a free market. They may have good reason to believe that.
If U.S. dollars need legal tender laws to ensure their utility as a store of value and medium of exchange, I think this indicates a weakness, not a strength.



943. Post 5775565 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 18, 2014, 11:42:33 PM

Whether I am conflating or NOT, I am trying to use the current world as a starting point, rather than projecting some pie in the sky vision that is built upon a house of cards of conjectures about some speculative vision about "how things could be, if....".     One thing you seem to be arguing the same points over and over, including voluntary nature of participation in society - but using different creative terms to say the same thing about your not wanting to be a subject of rules unless you completely agree with them on some ultimately unattainable level of specific consent.

Interestingly enough, the phrase "pie in the sky" originated from a slave preacher who was paid by plantation owners to tell his fellow slaves that if they were good little slaves, they would get pie in the sky when they died. Slavery abolitionists were no less radical in their day than anarcho-capitalists are now. Slavery had been part of every civilization for thousands of years until it wasn't any more. Which one of us is really more guilty of pie in the sky thinking?

Quote

Yes, you are making such brilliant points that average individuals do NOT understand the profound nature of your abstractions.  Also, maybe you are failing to understand that it may NOT even matter whether or NOT you are correct b/c part of the resolution to be a part of a community is to compromise and to go along with the wishes of the community rather than imposing some superior vision upon the community.. even if you were to be correct. Personally, I am NOT as attached to outcomes, so long as the public is getting what it wants, and ultimately will likely result in the entering into various compromises that will NOT be satisfactory to every single individual.  Sometimes, that means that we cannot have our cake and eat it too.

INDIVIDUAL consent is the only consent that means anything. If we voted to kill all the Jews or some other minority and take their stuff, it would not be legitimate merely because the decision was popular. It's no more legitimate if that minority is the rich, provided they came by their wealth honestly.

Quote

Yes, if you are trying to privatize all or a majority of public goods, then it becomes very likely that you are going to fail to allow for the public good  to serve the public.  

I don't know about that. If I'm on a road trip, I'd rather take a crap at a truck stop than a rest area. They're cleaner, just as free, and I'm less likely to get assaulted.

Quote

I argue that you are trying to oversimplify the various levels of government and the various public goods and services that governments need to provide.  Your supposed hypothetical system is NOT going to end up covering various needs and goods b/c it will result in a bunch of freeloaders, like you seem to be, who do NOT want to pay, unless they agree with what they are paying.

LOL. Because freeloading is not a problem now, is it? I'm not oversimplifying. I'm just starting with the simple, because you can't even seem to get that right.

Quote

 when we are talking about community values, none of us will get to completely call the shots b/c we have to be able to work together to figure out what is best for the community and hopefully, figure out which representatives are going to best serve in the public interest (rather than their personal / private interests).  

Um, there is only one of us that is even trying to call the shots and it isn't me. I am arguing that we can't know what is best for the community and so we should err on the side of freedom rather than control. Because I do understand society is complex, I know that the unintended consequences of mandates and bans can often be worse than the problems they were put in place to address.


Quote

You seem to come up with these perversions through a sense of maniacal focus about yourself.  IN the end the social contract is one of consent, even though you keep saying that you feel forced.  The community is NOT imposed on you, but a state of mind about whether you belong to the community comes from you, not from other imposing their will upon you.  I realize that may be too abstract for you to comprehend b/c you keep coming back to the same monotonous assertion that you are being forced.  Poor thing.   Cry    Maybe the solution is that you have to figure how to live with yourself, and several of you libertarian wanna-be s have been citing Alan Watts... which is fine and dandy.. b/c there is a certain amount of self empowerment that is projected through his teachings.


The social contract? You're joking, right? When did I agree to this contract? Is this an "opt in" contract or an "opt out" contract? What are the other parties obligations, and what are the consequences if they don't meet those obligations? Did I authorize someone else to negotiate this contract on my behalf?
http://jim.com/treason.htm

Quote
Sure there are mixed views about the various goals of government, and freedom is one of those goals... that is weighed by the community.

It doesn't matter if you think my government is legitimate. The government itself claims legitimacy stems from securing pre-existing natural rights. "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed"~ D of I, 1776

but wait, There's more!:

"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

The community is a group of individuals. If the government's legitimacy stems from the consent of the governed, then to the extent individuals do not consent, it is illegitimate. You claim to care about the poor and needy. I suggest before we debate the relative merits of stealing FOR them, perhaps we should agree to stop stealing FROM them. We are members of communities and societies, and that does carry obligations, among them, the obligation not to steal from our fellow community and society members.



944. Post 5776035 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

The solution to deciding who gets to hold the gun is to get rid of the gun. Concentrated power is a problem, no matter who wields it. The solution is to decentralize and distribute. It works for Bitcoin. It can work for governance.



945. Post 5776365 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 19, 2014, 02:49:02 AM

I'm NOT joking, and I do NOT claim to be any expert... but I believe it works something like this.. you are in automatically, unless and until you opt out.  You are born into whatever society and community that you partake and you, hopefully, take on some of the societal values along the way.. unless you come out perverted from watching too much Fox news... and getting perverted ideas into your head about how you are being coerced.. and you need your freedom bullshit.  There is freedom within the social contract, from my understanding.  The obligations and responsibilities vary, and someone else negotiates for you until you grow up enough to understand... which I by now, you should already understand.  The consequences could be pretty grave including exile or death if you break certain social rules.  I should NOT have to explain these kinds of social contract principles to you.  If you want to change the social contract, then I suppose you can campaign.. which you seem to be attempting through this thread, but I am NOT the one to persuade... b/c I do NOT completely understand your situation but certainly it seems to me that you have adaptation issues.... b/c you seem unwilling or unable to accept and understand certain basic social contract principles...

Maybe you need to go to re-education so you can get in touch with the norms of your community?  Or practice some zen, so you are NOT getting so worked up about it.  there is only so much that you can change in any given society in any one setting, so acceptance should also be built into your psych... at least to some degree.


This is not how contracts work. You can't negotiate a contract on behalf of someone who isn't born yet and make it be binding on them. Moreover, most everyone who does consent to the U.S. Constitution was indoctrinated in government schools for twelve years or more. Contracts are not valid when one party is pressured, brainwashed, coerced or lied to.  And contracts are null and void when one party breaches them.  The U.S. Government has violated the constitution so many times that it doesn't even pretend to follow for example the enumerated powers provision of the Tenth Amendment. Not only that, but the government claims to be the sole interpreter and enforcer of the very document that is supposed to limit it's power.

This is not how contracts work. This is how the mafia works.



946. Post 5776587 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 19, 2014, 02:49:02 AM

 Maybe you need to go to re-education so you can get in touch with the norms of your community? 


Are you seriously suggesting sending me to a re-education camp? Are you paying attention to what you are typing?

The norms of my community are 1) don't hurt people 2)don't mess with their stuff and 3) keep your promises. These are the norms of your community too. Eliminating the exceptions to these norms would go a long way towards unifying the community and resolving social problems.




947. Post 5777156 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: seleme on March 19, 2014, 05:06:47 AM
LTC is becoming the honey badger of today, but most people expected us to dip a lil further than btc did today.

It's keeping BTC at this level too. Guess some profits have been turned to BTC.

That works in both directions. The easiest way to get litecoin is to trade bitcoin for LTC. That means you have to get some BTC first.



948. Post 5777694 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: OldGeek on March 19, 2014, 06:07:44 AM
This is a little off topic, but what hasn't been for the last week or so   Grin

So... I was gonna donate a little and got to this page:
Code:
english version

It’s been a while now since we promised ourselves to explain why we do not accept Bitcoins as
 donation method.  To summarize, the list of reasons we all agreed are the following:

1 they are not really anonymous (it is stated also on their official website)

2 we pay our services in Euro or in Dollar, not in Bitcoin, for this reason we should then
convert them anyway. To convert them we should be using one of these Bitcoins exchange
sites which are not that transparent and who control a big amount of the total Bitcoin traffic
and it’s not proven that they are any better than normal banks.

3 we feel a general hatred for Bitcoins and their financial speculations which at the moment
are holding the Bitcoin market. We all have seen the trend over time of this new coin and it
looked pretty much like the typical behavior of an investment subject to speculative bubbles
and we do not consider this a behavior of a ‘comunitarian’ coin.

To summarize even more: bitcoins do not give us any specific advantage compared to a
normal bank account and we are lazy. the real anonymous donations are made in a sealed
envelope using latex gloves.

Also at this point it seems pretty clear to us that to consider Bitcoin as a “currency”  is ‘a little’
improper: Bitcoin are an investment fund pump & dump done to dupe the ultra-libertarian
anarco-capitalists.

In short, we find ourselves with a certain unease to participate actively in this financial
game.

English is not their first language, but they made their statement pretty clear.  We have quite
a ways to go before global acceptance is assured.


Who is this?



949. Post 5779612 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 19, 2014, 08:34:23 AM
If for some reason, instead of watching bugs bunny, you grew up watching fox news, then you may need to be educated into social norms... b/c they taught you badly. 

I don't watch Fox News, but I also don't see them as any more biased than CBS, ABC, NBC, or CNN. They may be biased differently, but not more. They all suck.

Quote
Second, I am paying attention to what I am typing, and their has been a certain level of frustration  in that you have this tendency to continue to want to engage in a conversation in which we have repeated ourselves numerous times.  Can we just agree to disagree and move on, rather than your wanting to continue... ... So I my be expressing some frustration in continuing what seems to be a repetitive conversation.

You are advocating coercion. It may be common, widely accepted, perceived as necessary for the greater good, called something else, etc- but it's still coercion. Why can't we agree to disagree about raping your sister and move on? Consent is the central issue. I'm not going to agree to disagree about using/threatening violence to violate people's consent.




950. Post 5779692 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

The funny thing is JJG and I both disagree with the generally held view that monopoly government is a necessary evil. The difference is that he claims it's not evil and I claim it's not necessary.



951. Post 5779783 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: mmitech on March 19, 2014, 09:14:24 AM
any reason why ltc responded to the opening on huobi by tanking? now i wonder what an opening on gox would've been like - worse?

wasn't this expected ?  this is only the short term reaction, lets see what will happen the next couple of months Smiley I didn't sell a single LTC, I saw this coming but I am playing the longer term

If you expected a pump and dump, then why didn't you sell near the top and re-buy to increase your holdings?




952. Post 5795419 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 19, 2014, 10:00:38 PM

+ One Dozen

+XIII



953. Post 5797335 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-19/chinese-yuan-collapsing

Two ways to look at this:

1) Broke Chinese aren't going to buy shit OR
2) with a crashing RMB, BTC could be a better store of value.





954. Post 5797866 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: creekbore on March 20, 2014, 04:51:01 AM
http://www.wired.com/opinion/2014/02/silicon-valley-backlash/

Works for me.

So what if people stop providing free content to Youtube and Facebook? What does that have to do with Bitcoin? People use plastics and oil more than ever. The commoditization of Bitcoin is not a danger because it was designed as a commodity. Bitcoin adoption should be driven by utility more than fashion.



955. Post 5797957 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 20, 2014, 04:59:15 AM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-19/chinese-yuan-collapsing

Two ways to look at this:

1) Broke Chinese aren't going to buy shit OR
2) with a crashing RMB, BTC could be a better store of value.




is the yuan crashing or is the USD deflating?

this is consistent with the coming of the US stock market crash.

It all depends on your perspective. Do you mean monetary contraction due to loans being paid off/written off? The answer is...compared to what? http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-19/beef-prices-surge-most-decade-food-inflation-soars

The Fed may be tapering, but they are still at zero interest rates and quantitatively easing. It would be more accurate to say that the dollar is losing value at a slower rate than the Yuan.



956. Post 5798222 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: aminorex on March 20, 2014, 05:48:34 AM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-19/chinese-yuan-collapsing

Two ways to look at this:

1) Broke Chinese aren't going to buy shit OR
2) with a crashing RMB, BTC could be a better store of value.

Hypothetically, if RMB drops faster than BTC, then BTC is going up, from the PRC perspective -- a bullish situation.

Actually RMB drops excruciatingly slowly, so no "wealth effect" is bandwagon-ing BTCCNY just yet.  However, in the longer term it is likely to occur.


The PRC has an interest as a net exporter to maintain a weak currency. It will play hell with the Chinese importers of natural resources, however. We are possibly witnessing a collapse of their shadow banking industry which is leading to a scramble for liquidity. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-19/music-just-ended-wealthy-chinese-are-liquidating-offshore-luxury-homes-scramble-cashThis could trigger a BTC sell off.

Longer term, if the ChiComs take a page out of the Bernanke playbook when we had the Lehman Brothers collapse in the U.S., it could lead to  the next great bull market as the world engages in yet another round of competitive currency debasement.



957. Post 5798634 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: aminorex on March 20, 2014, 06:24:05 AM

BTC is so marginal that I don't think there's going to be much correlation between on-shore BTC and the on-shore credit market.

We'll see. Most BTC that was bought on credit will likely be liquidated. It could go either way, but if too many Chinks go broke, you will see liquidation of a lot of assets.
Cyprus cubed or divestiture. It'll be an interesting ride.



958. Post 5809876 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 20, 2014, 06:37:20 PM
-1102
-7



959. Post 5812133 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: threecats on March 20, 2014, 09:24:19 PM
All I am seeing is alot of price exhaustion, no buying enthusiasm. I think this, plus the failure to escape the long term bearish slide, some pretty clear whale intention signals, and most importantly - the scary thin orderbooks across the exchanges, with giant air pockets all the way down to double digits - make 580 feel like a breathing point,and not much more.

I remember prepping my low orders during the Gox 24 hours, the low end of the bid book was like a jungle of multi-hundred orders. Now it is an African savannah. Occasional trees. 

When there's buying enthusiasm, it's time to sell. I don't use the Force. I don't trust my feelings. I buy the whole way down and sell the whole way up. The only thing I know about guys like the $710 whale is you don't see them coming.



960. Post 5836014 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: seleme on March 22, 2014, 06:28:25 AM
HODLing for so long. Too tired to sell. Sure ill regret not not selling looking @ the charts.

Doeesnt the VISA-Mastercard deposit/withdrawal method at btc-e open BTC up for most people who cant do international bank transfers to exchanges and everybody who has cards. Isnt that great news? Mass userbase ??

it's only withdrawal

Putin and the rest of the victims of the latest round of sanctions have no access to VISA/Mastercard because VISA MC have stopped doing business with Rossiya Bank. BTC-e is the workaround if they are smart enough to use it. If sanctions escalate (and they are likely to), Bitcoin itself could get a huge boost. It's sanction-proof.



961. Post 5836088 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: MANofthePEOPLE on March 22, 2014, 08:40:37 AM
I'm usually fairly pessimistic but now there's a lot more support on the buy side than sell. Really don't think we'll break 540 anytime soon

Mark my words. We'll be back above $580 before the weekend is over. There will be a minimum $40/BTC bounce off the lows. Bargain hunters may not even get a full Saturday. I'm buying now and keeping just a little fiat handy in case it goes lower first. I've seen this happen too many times.



962. Post 5836544 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

YEEhaw! filling my pockets.



963. Post 5839215 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 22, 2014, 10:58:50 AM
to me, only question of time when 530 $ is breach.

then it will be panic time.

2000 coins on bitstamp before that. Single small buy and we shoot back up into the 580's and beyond. But yeah the chart looks bearish. Any sign of a turn and ill buy my next twenty coins.


in a bear market? good luck!


just place your bids low enough. dont fall in bull traps.

This is not a bear market. We are still up 40% from the 400 low.



964. Post 5840190 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: wetroof on March 22, 2014, 02:34:46 PM
objectively we are in a b*** market.

Horse shit. Objectively we are 40% up from the low less than a month ago, >100% up from where were were 4 and a half months ago. Since then we've added millions of wallets, features, upgrades, merchants, and ATMs.  



965. Post 5840542 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: sir faps on March 22, 2014, 03:13:46 PM
objectively we are in a b*** market.

To everyone who read this as "objectively we are in a BEAR market", that is not what wetroof is saying. This statement is a joke. Literally. b*** could be bull or it could be bear. Interesting to notice how everyone who has replied to this post this far has read it as bear though...

ok, my bad. I get it. I'm still buying.



966. Post 5843597 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on March 22, 2014, 06:34:15 PM
He nailed one thing for sure:  the no volume part, which is concerning for bull at least. If the coins are really dat cheap, why no volume?
The distributed P2P federal reserve (that is the Bitcoin speculators) have exhausted there fiat canons.  
We need a new QE type plan metaphorically lets not call it bond buying but investing in Alts. Instead of buying fiat.

Nope. Our cannons are aimed squarely at the bears. If the price drops just a little bit more...BOOM! Got yer coins. Go ahead and sell. Just try it. You'll see how much fiat we have left.



967. Post 5844042 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2014, 07:06:05 PM
im supposed to not wire more fiat then i can lose but i might have to do it Cool
A monetary loss cannot be measured just in dollars, you must consider what it could mean to your life, now and in the future.  If you have a few million $, losing 100 k$ is only an inconvenience, and you will probably recover those 100 k$ in a matter of months .  If all you own is a house worth 200 k$, losing 100 k$ is a big trauma, may even cost your family and you may never recover those 100 k$. 

If it helps you decide, I am going to change my signature from "rather skeptic" to "very skeptic".  I now put the chances of Bitcoin (specifically, not some future crypto-coin) becoming a significant currency of e-commerce at about the same level of myself becoming Pope.  And it has nothing to do with price evolution or recent news.


You spend an awful lot of time and effort being skeptical of Bitcoin. Is there anything you're optimistic about or are you just a generally skeptical guy?



968. Post 5844982 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on March 22, 2014, 07:41:41 PM
How low do you think it will go this time? I want to buy back in a 100. Will I get the chance?
No

Why not?

Because I will sell my kidneys before that happens. Ok, maybe only one kidney and my house, truck, motorcycle, watch, sister, blood plasma, teeth, shoes...



969. Post 5845070 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2014, 07:57:52 PM
You spend an awful lot of time and effort being skeptical of Bitcoin. Is there anything you're optimistic about or are you just a generally skeptical guy?

Not much... I see that the world is in a terrible mess, and paths to a better future are long, narrow and lost in the fog of uncertainty...

My country seems to be moving  in the right direction, finally; although it too has a long way to go and its enemies are formidable.

The world is turning away from nuclear energy, coal and oil, hopefully to wind, hydro, solar.  Even if these are more expensive now (not of nuclear it seems), the price will be worth it, IMHO.

Right now I can't think of anything else that feels positive.  Human rights, on the internet or outside it, are not progressing, somtimes are going backwards. (Intenet censorship is much worse now than it was in the 1990s, especially in the "free" countries.)  Agriculture is becoming more and more "inhuman". Industry is centralized in megacorporations that use patents to stifle competition.  And so on...

Even cryptocurrency, a potentially nice idea, has become the "property" of  a swarm of scumbags, that make bankers look like angels of virtue and generosity. in comparison.

It seems like your skepticism of Bitcoin can be attributed to your disposition as much if not more than to any particular flaw you see. 



970. Post 5845126 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on March 22, 2014, 08:11:36 PM
How low do you think it will go this time? I want to buy back in a 100. Will I get the chance?
No

Why not?

Because I will sell my kidneys before that happens. Ok, maybe only one kidney and my house, truck, motorcycle, watch, sister, blood plasma, teeth, shoes...

I'll give you a hundred bucks for everything. You can keep the teeth.

Don't want a hundred bucks. I want MOAR coinz!



971. Post 5845468 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

It's a lot easier to catch falling knives when it's just buying back the coins you sold on the way up. That way momentum traders give me dollars AND coinz.



972. Post 5847183 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2014, 09:55:16 PM
Keep in mind that we need a fossil fuel-based infrastructure to produce solar panels, windmills and other so-called renewable energy sources. Producing things like electric cars and solar panels is very expensive (and extremely energy intensive), having a very low EROEI.
Cheap energy is not "essential", it is just cheap.  Yes, electric cars are at best barely competitive with gasoline-powered ones, so while the latter exist they are "economically challenged."  Ditto for wind and solar power.  But I believe that the world will figure out that it can't have a coal- and oil- based economy forever, so they will learn to live with more expensive electric cars, choose more energy-efficient homes and transportation, etc..  Civiization will surely NOT grind to a halt because of that.

Think money supply. With inflationary currency, there is no incentive to consume less and save. With a deflationary currency, there is an incentive for less resources to get consumed.



973. Post 5848652 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2014, 11:56:53 PM
The issue I see you describing is with a finite number of monetary units (divisibility being ineffective because it results in asymmetrical distribution of wealth) how can the units be equitably distributed so an economy can effectively distribute resources and maximize participation?

More precisely, the problem that the world will face by adopting THE Bitcoin as the global currency is that the system will start out with ALL the money in the hands of a few thousand people and the "bankers" (miners).

Even if those "bitcoin barons" are generous and spend half of their BTC hoards in exchange for trifles, just to get the bitcoin economy started, they will still hold half of the money supply in the world.

What are the chances of the world being OK with that?

What are the chances that the world will be OK with a small group of central bankers controlling the money supply? Look, if people find Bitcoin useful and saves them money, then they are likely to use it, the same way people shop at Walmart even though the Waltons are extremely wealthy, pay low wages and buy stuff from China.



974. Post 5850358 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 23, 2014, 03:24:00 AM
He nailed one thing for sure:  the no volume part, which is concerning for bull at least. If the coins are really dat cheap, why no volume?
The distributed P2P federal reserve (that is the Bitcoin speculators) have exhausted there fiat canons.  
We need a new QE type plan metaphorically lets not call it bond buying but investing in Alts. Instead of buying fiat.

Nope. Our cannons are aimed squarely at the bears. If the price drops just a little bit more...BOOM! Got yer coins. Go ahead and sell. Just try it. You'll see how much fiat we have left.



That's the problem... The bears have squeezed about as much out of us as they can... They gonna have to come up with some more tricks, fud  or false news to get us to stop squeezing our BTCs.  I do have some fiat in reserve just in case the price drops more.. .my next buy point is at below $550 on Coinbase... and I question whether we are going to get to that price point... maybe I will have to panic buy at $570, instead?

I'd love to get another crack at sub $550, but I don't need to. I'll do just fine if we never see that level again. I try to position myself so that I am happy to go up down or sideways. It's a lot easier if you have a bunch of coinz that you've had for years. Otherwise I'd be panic buying now.



975. Post 5852070 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

I don't understand why people hate corporations more than governments. Corporations don't force you to do business with them. Governments do. Most of the evil done by corporations is enabled or facilitated by the governments anyway.

It shouldn't matter if BTC is concentrated in a few hands with a stable money supply. It doesn't do the holders any good unless they spend it and if they do, they don't have it anymore. The people who own it now and in the future are the people who value it the most, the people willing to pay the price it takes to get it and pay the opportunity costs of holding it.



976. Post 5863258 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

https://twitter.com/barrysilbert/status/447836584554266624




977. Post 5879903 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 24, 2014, 08:27:31 PM
I just rubbed it in my local grocer's face that I no longer consider myself a lifetime Gold member of their establishment because [ .. ] they ignored my request to add Bitcoin.
There, I found another reason to be skeptic about the success of bitcoin: bitcoiners will shop at Walmart instead of at their local grocer, therefore they will eat less healthy food, therefore the genetic predisposition to believe in privately issued cryptocurrencies will soon be weeded out of mankind's gene pool by natural selection.
Wink

Natural selection takes eons before you see effects. Multiple generations. Walmart stock and profits are doing just fine. If Bitcoin does half as well, I'll sire a few litters of bastards to pass on my genes before I die anyway. Bitchez love guys with money, even if you don't spend it on them.

http://orymh.bandcamp.com/track/the-bitcoin-rally-song



978. Post 5881339 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: barbs on March 24, 2014, 09:46:47 PM
nice pump and dump!

$45 up, $15 down. If that's a pump and dump, I'll gladly be a victim of a few more. If you have enough BTC, there is really no such thing as a bull trap. I sell on the rallies and buy back on the way down, and I end up with more BTC than when I started. and I have so much that I will never run out. (I sell a percentage). 



979. Post 5882730 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 22, 2014, 08:48:23 AM
I'm usually fairly pessimistic but now there's a lot more support on the buy side than sell. Really don't think we'll break 540 anytime soon

Mark my words. We'll be back above $580 before the weekend is over. There will be a minimum $40/BTC bounce off the lows. Bargain hunters may not even get a full Saturday. I'm buying now and keeping just a little fiat handy in case it goes lower first. I've seen this happen too many times.

I didn't get the timing perfect, but I'm calling this a win. Sure as hell made me money!



980. Post 5882996 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: FullLife on March 24, 2014, 11:52:59 PM
I'm usually fairly pessimistic but now there's a lot more support on the buy side than sell. Really don't think we'll break 540 anytime soon

Mark my words. We'll be back above $580 before the weekend is over. There will be a minimum $40/BTC bounce off the lows. Bargain hunters may not even get a full Saturday. I'm buying now and keeping just a little fiat handy in case it goes lower first. I've seen this happen too many times.

I didn't get the timing perfect, but I'm calling this a win. Sure as hell made me money!

Even a broken clock is right twice a day Grin.

That's with a binary outcome (right or wrong). I called a $40 bounce minimum and it bounced $45. I got the direction and the amount. Nobody has beaten my record.



981. Post 5890739 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: magicmexican on March 25, 2014, 11:13:46 AM
Still mostly sideways, but price still higher than i expected

4 hr moving average crossover vs. anemic order book. Bogus ATM story in Dubai vs. Walmart gyft cards. Could go either way.



982. Post 5903340 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 26, 2014, 01:06:03 AM


1D ichimoku seems to indicate that if $625 is or has been broken during/after NEXT week, then the trend has reversed. 3D MACD would probably agree as well.

If your charts, lines, mac d's etc would actually be working you would be a billionaire by now. You still don't understand why you're not?
Wow I cannot even post a bullish TA now without getting flak?

FYI I have outperformed the bitcoin market by 10,000%, meaning if I bought and held I'd be up 400%in fiat value, but instead I'm up 40,000%. The problem was I started with a very small capital.

To me, that means that you have gotten 4,000 times return on your initial investment. 

Accordingly, if you started with $1,000, you now have $400,000. 

I wished I could figure out how to get those kinds of returns, but I do NOT want to work too hard... I'm thinking that there's gotta be some luck involved, also... .

It's a claimed 400X return, not a 4,000X return, but she pulls~ 10% fiat out every three months or so, so I suspect actual returns (which should be calculated to include those funds) are much lower. Correct me if I'm wrong, TERA.



983. Post 5903556 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 26, 2014, 01:31:20 AM
[ ... ] the anarchic pipedream of an unregulated global economy without banks and outside the reach of governments, laws and police is not only impossible to succeed, but would be a barbaric nightmare if it did.  
You make the claim "impossible to succeed" with no justification or consideration for the end goal of cooperation to produce surpluses for the benefits of all members.
I am not aware of any time in history, any place in the world, where a society of more than a dozen people  has survived for more than a couple of months without some sort of government, laws, and law enforcement.  Even chimpanzees have leaders and rules of behavior; so government is probably in our genes, and more fundamental to human nature than language and technology.

If a society ceases to have a functioning government,  and does not get another one quick enough, some neighboring society will promptly and forcibly lend its own.

Financial regulations in particular were created in response to economic collapses such as the crash of 1929.  Conversely, the bank disasters of recent times can be traced to the waves of deregulation that started with Reagan&Thatcher and were copied by neocon governments all over the world.  

Less law enforcement invariably has meant more crime.  Why would it be different in Bitcoinland?

There may have been already more bitcoin scams than honest businesses, and more goxed exchanges than exchanges still functioning.  This list is already impressive, yet it has not been updated since last november.  Now, very few of those crimes have resulted in any criminal cases.  So, why should the criminals stop?  Without laws and law enforcement, fraudster and thieves fare much better than people who respect others's property.


It's quite a logical leap to go from needing leaders and rules of behavior to needing rulers, which is what monopoly governments are.



984. Post 5904809 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: TERA on March 26, 2014, 02:36:57 AM

I started with X, and now I have 400*X. It is that simple. It has nothing to do with how much I've withdrawn.

I was previously on a schedule of withdrawing about 20% every 3 months. However, now, for the first time ever, I have withdrawn 50% and split my funds entirely in half - 50% remain in btc and the btc markets, and 50% is back on earth. This will add a small setback to the exponential growth of my funds. However, I had to do this to:
1. Pay my taxes
2. Diversify in preparation for a potential economic collapse.
3. Lock in the ability to support myself and pay expenses for 1-2 years.
4. Buy some business equipment.
5. I wanted to open a brokerage account to try my hand in daytrading stocks/forex/futures. With this type of account I can still potentially exponentially grow these funds but they are not locked in as paper gains in the btc world.
I am now considering real estate investments also, but have not allocated any funds for it.

No, my primary occupation is not trading or finance. I am a software developer.

It's just hard to believe that you effectively doubled up 9X in a row to get returns like that. Did you use leverage on bitfinex? Borrow BTC to short it? Outperforming the market 400X is an extraordinary claim. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence and I have yet to see much evidence. Nothing personal.



985. Post 5905480 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 26, 2014, 04:16:47 AM
400x profits are not unheard of nor uncommon in bitcoin land.

I know that, but there's a difference between 400X profits and outperforming the market by 400X. You can get 400X profits just by buying and holding long enough. Beating the market by 40,000% is a different thing entirely.



986. Post 5908234 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: Tyson95 on March 26, 2014, 09:19:53 AM
Things are heating up

Confirmed

Good-sized buy on stamp



987. Post 5908272 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: el_rlee on March 26, 2014, 08:46:13 AM
I found that there is an exchange (VirWox) where one can trade BTC and other cryptocoins for Second Life's currency, the Linden dollar (L$, SLL).
https://www.virwox.com/

It seems that one can buy SLLs with cash at VirWox, to use in the game, but not sell them for cash.

What is the legal status of Linden dollars in the US?  It seems that they are not considered a currency. Are they considered valuable property?


It's one of the oldest exchanges, located in Vienna, Austria - I guess under the radar of regulators for a long time now...

Oddly enough I just cleared out my three year old account there today so that I can trade those coins on margin at bitfinex. You can indirectly buy BTC with credit cards there.



988. Post 5908484 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

just crossed on the 6 hr moving average.



989. Post 5909917 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: Todorius on March 26, 2014, 11:25:31 AM

dun dun dun... which way will the triangle break? Either way will set off additional major indicators. If it breaks up, we're probably back in a bull market, and if it breaks down, we might be in for a really long bear market like 2011 as the 1W emas cross down. Which will happen? Can I get a drumroll?

Do you actually have to ask?  Ignore the chart and just think about it.  It is not as though mass psychology was the only factor.  At this point, any bearish breakdown must be faded.

Agreed. A prolongued bear market like in 2011 seems pretty unlikely to me. Not with all the new money flowing in the bulding of the bitcoin ecosystem. Adoption is still going up, the number of transactions rises exponentially. New bitcoin startups emerge on a weekly basis, the sentiment already seems quite optimistic to me. There is only one way, and that is up.
See July 2013 for reference.

It's not that simple. The Chinese economy is on the knife edge of a major correction with bank runs, property market collapse, etc. We have a possible war brewing in Ukraine, tapering by the Fed, Ebola in Canada yada yada. I'm bullish, 95% BTC and going to go levered long if it drops below $570 again, but it's a risk. Shit happens.



990. Post 5924287 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: shmadz on March 27, 2014, 12:31:18 AM
btw, has everyone seen this already?

http://politiken.dk/oekonomi/dkoekonomi/ECE2244816/bitcoin-gevinster-kan-stikkes-direkte-i-lommen/

After seeing the tax treatment the IRS put out recently, I'd move to Denmark in a second, if I didn't think the whole country is going to sink into the ocean, lol.

This would be the sensible stance for Canada (and every country really) to take, but sadly, I get the feeling that Heir Harper will follow the US precedent, as always.

:edit:

Whoa, wait a sec, Greenland would be under the same law, right?

Greenland can't be much worse than Canada, and after the glacier melts, there should be lots of cheap land for sale... hmmmmmm Wink

Greenland would be mostly underwater if the glaciers melted. It would be an archipelago.



991. Post 5926687 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: fotosonics on March 27, 2014, 05:28:36 AM
Holy crap. Has anyone seen "Atlas Shrugged?" Rearden Metal = Bitcoin

Rearden refused to sell out to gov't buyout offer, subjected to media smear campaign/FUD...

and just like with Hank Reardon, they will discover that I will burn down the factory before I sell my coins too cheaply due to their ham-fisted strong-arm tactics. If USG wants to buy my coins, they can get in the order queue like everybody else.



992. Post 5927035 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

WTF?? I'm new to bitfinex, but the spot price just blew through my $558.9 limit order price and the whole thin disappeared like it wasn't ever there! no trade took place. I'm confused.



993. Post 5927318 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on March 27, 2014, 08:37:17 AM
Did you mean Catalonia by any chance?  Wink

Lol, I was lazy and didn't fact check.  Yes, the one in Spain.  

I am expecting the billyjoeallen's reply:

Quote
Wait! but isn't Spain down there in Mexico where all those spanish come from?  Huh

 Grin

I wouldn't do that. I may not know much about Catalan seccessionism, but I do know how to google, Motherfucker. 



994. Post 5927442 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on March 27, 2014, 08:50:58 AM
https://plus.google.com/app/basic/stream/z124efeb5raxihxpc04chnnp0xm4h5og1uw0k

 need more fiat for coinzzzzzz

Is that Jordan Belfort's ex?



995. Post 5927744 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: TERA on March 27, 2014, 09:12:59 AM
Not sure if still crashing on the China FUD?
Why do you guys call it "China FUD". It is a FACT that PBOC issued advisories in December saying that banks and third party payment processors should not deal with bitcoin exchanges. Chinese bitcoin exchanges have now been illegally and manipulately skirting by this for months. How long did you think it would go before some enforcement action was taken? Even if this particular news is fake, it is only a matter of time before it actually happens.

Here I was thinking that current prices were representative of a Bitcoin that had moved on from China and now we were pricing based on demand outside of China. But I guess I was wrong. We still have deluded people ACTUALLY thinking that China is still with us and that China is just going to last forever and bitcoin is perfectly ok in China, and that we should price Bitcoin based on these assumptions. "yay go china"   "omg ltc on china".  Ridiculous!

Hey, I just started trading on bitfinex and my limit order disappeared without filling. What gives? Has that ever happened to you?
Had to pay double fee to market order.



996. Post 5928340 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: TERA on March 27, 2014, 10:04:45 AM
WTF?? I'm new to bitfinex, but the spot price just blew through my $558.9 limit order price and the whole thin disappeared like it wasn't ever there! no trade took place. I'm confused.
Where did you enter it, on exchange or trading? Make sure you're looking in the right place for your order and for your position. An exchange wallet position will show actual bitcoins in your wallet balance, but a trading position will show as a position in a table only on the trading page.

trading. I'm doubling down, or trying to.



997. Post 5928994 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Ok, I think I'm set up on Bitfinex for now. I'm levered long. Everybody buy buy buy. You can sell down to $545 and I'll take your coins, but if it crashes below $175 I'll get a margin call and I'm screwed. Gonna take a nap. Happy trading!



998. Post 5930461 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

holy fuck. just woke up. wha happened?



999. Post 5933933 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Damn! Never thought I'd have three digits worth of BTC in a day trading account! I wonder how many bulls got margins calls. I expect a few got completely wiped out. Unbelievable.  Now I'm wondering how much worse it's going to get before it gets better. MOAR COINZ!!!!



1000. Post 5934559 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: darklight on March 27, 2014, 04:52:22 PM
Its middle of the night now in China, it will be at least 8 hours before this news gets confirmed as real or not and probably more. Until that happens we are still on very shaky gorund

Yeah and it's still $507 on Huobi weighing like a boat anchor on the price. Huobi actually dipped LOWER than the Goxing at $400! I would have liked to have had access to those coinz. Still might, I guess.



1001. Post 5939216 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

So what if, just if, the PBOC announces tomorrow that the news is inaccurate? How much of a rebound? Wouldn't want to be short if that happened.

OTOH, if FUD is confirmed, it's just Fear and Doubt because the uncertainty is removed. Seems like more upside than down to me.

Oh, mighty Whale Gods, deliver us from margin calls.



1002. Post 5939647 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: boumalo on March 27, 2014, 10:29:56 PM
taxing capital gains is often taxing inflation


I never thought about that before, but you're right. They're taxing a tax.  The criminal part of my mind thinks that is the best scam ever. Now I wonder how you could tax a tax on the tax. A 1040 filing fee?



1003. Post 5940329 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: Dr. LY on March 27, 2014, 11:38:25 PM
It's that moment where you're terrified you're going to lose it all.

aka "The time to buy more"

+1 I should go back to playing no limit hold 'em. less stress.



1004. Post 5940463 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

This is what goes passes for capitulation for me. I'm out of fiat. out of leverage. Might lose everything in a margin call. Pawn shops are closed and I just bet the mortgage money. I'm just a spectator now. Good luck, Gentleman. I did everything I could.



1005. Post 5941725 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: TERA on March 28, 2014, 01:30:45 AM
I'm really angry that wall street is probably buying cheap coins right now (not much, but any is enough)... they should pay much higher price.

Not likely, haven't spoted any large buys. If they did, they were $540 and $500 walls, otherwise they didn't get much coins.

True... but I think they are playing smart here. Buying more like 100 coin in a time and not going big, at least not yet.
I think the going theory is that if they're smart, they're not buying on an exchange.

True, but how many off-exchange coins are now in the hands of hodlers? There's no ask walls, so anyone wanting to buy has to build bid walls, which may buy me enough time to sell my motorcycle or rob a liquor store so I can post margin.

I'm on my third pack of cigarettes today. Hope my kids like community college.



1006. Post 5942464 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: TERA on March 28, 2014, 02:00:26 AM
There's always this sharp rebound when the price enters a new area (breaks a support level) and goes down hard due to a thin order book area. It is as if the price is trying to deny that it went there and say that the drop was due to a glitch.  Eventually it falls back down.

As long as it doesn't crash far enough to trigger a margin call before I can sell everything I own, I can live with that.  This four month nightmare has to end sometime, and I can't take it with me when I die.



1007. Post 5942507 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

that's the most beautiful cup and handle I've ever seen. 3 min chart.



1008. Post 5943192 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

I want every asshole who complains that they never got a chance to buy the cheap coinz to kiss my ass. Yeah, I may go down holding BTC, but it's better than holding stinking government fiat. Those currencies are mortal, too.



1009. Post 5943511 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: spooderman on March 28, 2014, 04:16:36 AM



I want every asshole who complains that they never got a chance to buy the cheap coinz to kiss my ass. Yeah, I may go down holding BTC, but it's better than holding stinking government fiat. Those currencies are mortal, too.

Those currencies have nukes.

Those currencies are intentionally being debased. Nukes didn't stop the Soviets from going away. It's hard to love someone pointing a gun at you.



1010. Post 5948718 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on March 28, 2014, 12:22:56 PM
Anyone that's been around bitcoin for a while has seen this before, investors are patiently sitting on the sidelines waiting for the bears to run out. Anything other than that would be a poor strategy as bitcoin has a good history of repeating patterns, check the end of the fall from the rise in April Wink

EDIT: August 2012 is probably a little closer to the current situation, not much in the difference though.

When are these investors going to buy exactly? Maybe you noticed we have been going down for months.
And what sane person would buy big amounts of coins right now knowing that one fake tweet or rumous is enough for the sheep to panic sell everything they got and make Bitcoin drop 50 dollars in a few minutes. And since this is actually happening about once a week i really doubt any serious person would buy right.
They know that no amount of good news will make the price go up anymore. People will keep selling till it has become worthless if this stupidity continues.
An amazing idea ruined by traders and idiots.

Yeah, we're not gonna get saved by a million third world adopters buying in now. Retail speculators won't do it either and us true believers are tapped out. It will be Silicon Valley or Wall Street whales that will buy in with pocket change millions or we will keep going down until I get my margin call. I'm betting the farm that there will be a rescue by a forward thinking billionaire and yes I know what an insane risk that is, but it's the smart move and there's about 100 potential candidates and we need only one.



1011. Post 5950162 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: TERA on March 28, 2014, 01:48:38 PM
There has to be a counterbalance to all the cultish posts of the always-bullish people who think that prices are always going straight to the moon tomorrow regardless of any and all TA and that every unfavorable event is always made up.

It was us cultists who kept this project alive when it dropped from $32 to $3 and stayed there for a year. The fraction of investors like me who will willingly go down with the ship are the support base that gives BTC what some call "intrinsic" value. Without us, this really would be a Ponzi Scheme. Contributing to positive change in the world is just as important as ROI.



1012. Post 5950725 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: TERA on March 28, 2014, 02:18:56 PM
There has to be a counterbalance to all the cultish posts of the always-bullish people who think that prices are always going straight to the moon tomorrow regardless of any and all TA and that every unfavorable event is always made up.

It was us cultists who kept this project alive when it dropped from $32 to $3 and stayed there for a year. The fraction of investors like me who will willingly go down with the ship are the support base that gives BTC what some call "intrinsic" value. Without us, this really would be a Ponzi Scheme. Contributing to positive change in the world is just as important as ROI.
Really? It was people saying "to da moon" and "fud" that we're rescuing bitcoin? Or was it people who were spreading bitcoin adoption, developing services, adopting merchants, and writing code? Those are two separate things. One particular person might happen to play both roles, but they are still separate roles, and I'm only referring to one of those roles as a 'cultist'.

Unwarranted optimism is not typically cultish behavior. Many actual cultist think the world is going to end. Not the best choice of words, IMHO.



1013. Post 5953814 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: gizmoh on March 28, 2014, 04:33:09 PM
There has to be a counterbalance to all the cultish posts of the always-bullish people who think that prices are always going straight to the moon tomorrow regardless of any and all TA and that every unfavorable event is always made up.

It was us cultists who kept this project alive when it dropped from $32 to $3 and stayed there for a year. The fraction of investors like me who will willingly go down with the ship are the support base that gives BTC what some call "intrinsic" value. Without us, this really would be a Ponzi Scheme. Contributing to positive change in the world is just as important as ROI.

You know what? I give you that. I think it was Rampion who put it as something like "the hardcore (cultists) provide the base value, the traders/speculators add the volatility/spikes".

So, yes, those of you who are willing to go down with the ship, I pay my respect to you...

But this is the fucking speculation subforum. And, as you would expect by the name of it, speculators are not, by and large, interested in going down with the ship. And that's what pisses me off: not that the "cultists" are sitting this bear market out, but that they're shouting down those who discuss how to profit from the market conditions.

This reply deserves an award. GTFO from this thread noble cultists!

I have no problem at all with speculators with no ideological bent. The good ones add liquidity when it is valued and absorb liquidity when it's not. The bad one's give me and the good ones money. The beauty of Bitcoin is that you don't have to believe in it for it to work. However it you don't believe in it, then you are likely to bail when coins are too cheap and end up being a bad speculator.

As for profiting from market conditions, the market is sending a signal that may or may not be a false signal concerning Bitcoin's future in China. As time goes by, I think it is more and more likely that the signal is false. The PBoC has not confirmed or denied the rumor. I think denying rumors is probably lower on their priority list than confirming actual policy decisions so no news is likely to be good news. Now markets hate uncertainty and this definitely qualifies, so this may be a buying opportunity. Maybe.



1014. Post 5954726 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

I have not yet heard of a single confirmation of this Chinese ban story.  Not from the PBoC, not from any of the exchange owners. When a major news outlet reports a story that moves the markets over 20%, there should be some official word one way or another. It may be a lie, but the public should demand a response. This is just bizarre. Every story I can google just summarizes the original story and adds nothing. This is three days later.

Karpeles left us hanging, but he was one guy. How can five exchange operators leave us hanging?  If this story wasn't bullshit, someone would likely have leaked a confirmation by now.  This story is a Dorian.




1015. Post 5954876 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

1K dump on stamp, no support, and the price is holding anyway. weird.

edit: 3$ drop so far.



1016. Post 5955400 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

The best thing for Bitcoin long term is another test of support on higher volume. Everybody sell.






1017. Post 5955549 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: FelixO on March 28, 2014, 07:23:06 PM
Who in his right mind would keep 15000 bitcoins on an exchange just to flash it now and then

If knowing someone has that much around worries you that he might dump, then maybe the purpose of having them there is to worry you.



1018. Post 5955890 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 28, 2014, 07:43:44 PM
What would cause JorgeStolfi to buy?  Has he ever mentioned what the "tipping point" for him would be?  I am curious.
I already said that. I won't buy it for speculation, investment (whose "sale" I consider a scam), or even to help "the cause" (which at this point seems to have been totally derailed by "libertarians" and greedy financiers).

I may buy some cryptocoin someday to pay for something, if I find that it will be easier/cheaper/safer/faster/etc than the usual means (cash, check, bank remittance, cerdit card , debit card, ...).  Which does not look very likely right now.   Sad

If he changes his mind and buys some he should update [ his signature ]. Wink

Of course.

Bitcoin is inherently libertarian.


Dont think so.. .even though bitcoin may be very useful tool for many libertarian considerations

Bitcoin is peaceful and free market. That's what "libertarian" means.



1019. Post 5956006 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 28, 2014, 08:01:21 PM
485  Undecided Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry

Support wasn't tested on high enough volume. It will be tested again. That's price discovery.




1020. Post 5956213 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 28, 2014, 08:09:12 PM
Mr. Falkvinge has flip floped on Bitcoin, if you take his advice on the subject remove the fact he either lost faith or thought he would find a greater fool...

The first article I read from him was glowing, he said he was putting all his savings into it and he loved its supposed anonimity and privacy.  He apparently put all his money in MtGOX, and was quite upset a their failure, which cost him a few tens of thousands of euros.  Then he was disappointed when he figured out that bitcoin is not anonymous at all.  But he is still a fan of bitcoin it seems.



in 2011, Falkvinge told people to invest everything they had and everything they could borrow into bitcoin. I should have sold when I heard that. (and bought back lower, of course).  That was before the Goxxing that triggered the (in hindsight inevitable) crash from $32 to $2. Later, he said he held zero bitcoin. He sold AFTER the crash at a huge loss. I agree with some of his ideology, but ignore or even fade his investment advise.

He acquired more BTC later (prolly from donations) and left/kept it in Mt. Gox. Oops. I don't trust politicians, even libertarian ones.



1021. Post 5958807 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: aminorex on March 28, 2014, 10:51:45 PM
Into the valley of 400 rode the death.

These bears aren't charging. They're wandering in and getting picked off like zombies at an NRA ralley. The problems is we don't know how many of them are out there.



1022. Post 5959048 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: TERA on March 28, 2014, 11:23:35 PM
"cheap coins" - another cultist term

Imagine you were selling bitcoin futures contracts. What would someone have to pay you now in return for your bitcoin a year from now?

These coins are going up and you know it. You just don't know how much they're going to go down first.



1023. Post 5959157 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on March 28, 2014, 11:39:20 PM
"cheap coins" - another cultist term

Imagine you were selling bitcoin futures contracts. What would someone have to pay you now in return for your bitcoin a year from now?

These coins are going up and you know it. You just don't know how much they're going to go down first.


No, I dont know that. And clearly most of society disagrees as well.



Wasn't addressing you, Sir. I don't know what you know and don't care.



1024. Post 5959299 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 28, 2014, 11:49:49 PM
"cheap coins" - another cultist term

Imagine you were selling bitcoin futures contracts. What would someone have to pay you now in return for your bitcoin a year from now?

These coins are going up and you know it. You just don't know how much they're going to go down first.


I think the term 'cheap coins' TERA is referring to is used by cult sellers anticipating much cheaper prices, rather than how I might use the use the phrase, these coins are cheap.

the sentiment is, sell now and buy back some 'cheap coins' when the apocalypse comes.

I believe the worst is over.

The bottom is likely in, but that doesn't mean support won't be tested. I just wonder how long it will take for it to dawn on the people who already panic sold that there is about as much evidence of a China-wide ban as there is evidence that an elderly model train enthusiast with broken English wrote the Satoshi white paper.




1025. Post 5959874 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 29, 2014, 12:43:23 AM
Hoping to see 400 now. Come on weekend dip.

No.


.....hoping is not good enough. why will it dip?
 



 Because last weekend there was a dip due to a bogus story of a bitcoin ban in China. This week, there is another bogus story of a bitcoin ban in China. Some people are thinking the market is that stupid. They may be right, but although successful, this strategy may be starting to show diminishing returns.



1026. Post 5960018 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: windjc on March 29, 2014, 12:57:41 AM
Hoping to see 400 now. Come on weekend dip.

No.


.....hoping is not good enough. why will it dip?
 



 Because last weekend there was a dip due to a bogus story of a bitcoin ban in China. This week, there is another bogus story of a bitcoin ban in China. Some people are thinking the market is that stupid. They may be right, but although successful, this strategy may be starting to show diminishing returns.

Is the news bogus? There is certainly reason to believe it may not be.

The rumor cause a > 20% crash and yet three days later not a single confirmation from the PBoC or any of the half dozen exchanges. How do you prove a negative? The story is a Dorian.



1027. Post 5960027 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: windjc on March 29, 2014, 01:01:52 AM
...
Is the news bogus? There is certainly reason to believe it may not be.

Some reason more significant than repeats of a single article that contained no proof or references?

It wasn't a single article and it was also reported by one of the most respected news sources in China.

More respected than Newsweek? Please.



1028. Post 5960235 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: infofront on March 29, 2014, 01:20:06 AM
I believe the ban is real as well. I'll believe some of China's most reputable news sources over the permabulls on this forum that have been telling everyone to buy for the last three months.

Permabulls. You can't even get the term right. Fuckin sell your coins and wave them goodbye if you want. Remember when BTCChina shut down for two weeks because they thought they couldn't accept payments? How many times are people gonna fall for the same trick?



1029. Post 5960359 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: boumalo on March 29, 2014, 01:11:40 AM
...
Is the news bogus? There is certainly reason to believe it may not be.

Some reason more significant than repeats of a single article that contained no proof or references?

It wasn't a single article and it was also reported by one of the most respected news sources in China.

More respected than Newsweek? Please.

Tv in China is watch by hundreds of millions of people and articles are read by hundreds of millions of people as well

There is 1B of people in America and 4 in Asia...The center of the world is already Asia and it will be even more Asia as time pass by in the 21th century

You're missing the point. Sometimes the story is wrong, even if it's a major news source, even if other news sources regurgitate it.




1030. Post 5960432 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Let's say hypothetically that the ban is real. How much of that has already been priced in? Price has been dropping for four months since the first ban rumors. I'm almost hoping it's real because like Gox and Silk Road, we can finally get past it.



1031. Post 5960617 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: hdbuck on March 29, 2014, 01:27:13 AM
...
Is the news bogus? There is certainly reason to believe it may not be.

Some reason more significant than repeats of a single article that contained no proof or references?

I did see a link to CCTV posted on TradingView... did not click, figured it was in Chinese anyway... but many people were saying the [practical] ban was being discussed on CCTV.

Maybe I just got trolled.

I´m pretty sure that the ban is real. I just don´t know if and how much further we drop when it is official.

They banned another online payment service a few weeks ago, as far as i know.
No big deal for them to close their bank accounts.It´s similar to the Gox diaster, everybody knew about it but denied it until the last second.
People even sent money to Gox in the last days, when it was more than obvious what was happenin.
The chinese traders will probably trade until the last second and further, when it´s too late to get money out.


wouldnt they just hodl their coins for better days anyway?

If I lived in China, I would be buying as much as I could while I still could . It's primary value outside of speculation is to take advantage of a capital control loophole. I know I'm somewhat contrarian, but the fact that nobody is doing that should be informative.



1032. Post 5960682 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: windjc on March 29, 2014, 01:44:15 AM
Let's say hypothetically that the ban is real. How much of that has already been priced in? Price has been dropping for four months since the first ban rumors. I'm almost hoping it's real because like Gox and Silk Road, we can finally get past it.

Why is it so hard to imagine that we will test 380-400 before establishing a bottom?

That isn't hard to imagine. It's entirely possible. If that's what it takes to turn the market for good, I could live with that.



1033. Post 5960971 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: boumalo on March 29, 2014, 02:08:21 AM

Quote

You're missing the point. Sometimes the story is wrong, even if it's a major news source, even if other news sources regurgitate it.



Yes of course it is; I don't know what will be the extend of the ban in China but I doubt Newsweek know more than a Chinese newspaper


Newsweek broke the story that Dorian Nakamoto is Satoshi. I was using it as an example of a respected news source running with a half-baked theory and calling it Gospel. Is English not your first language? I was not disparaging Asia or China.



1034. Post 5961278 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 29, 2014, 02:46:42 AM
blah blah blah.

These are the kinds of trend-lines and bare assertion claims that i find problematic b/c the starting point is the ATH... It makes little to no sense to be to start from the ATH in order to make what point?  It may make a point about a current situation that is occurring, but it does NOT make any meaningful point about the overall health and/or value of bitcoin.... In my view focusing on that time period, remains just out of context and a form of limited information.

Extrapolating that trend line, BTC should trade for -3$ by mid July. Yes, that's right. People will pay you to take bitcoins off their hands.



1035. Post 5962300 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Why is the price going up? The Chinese are executing bitcoiners. The IRS is going to audit everybody and charge us with tax fraud. Warren Buffet is going to pour coke on us and make us swallow Gillette razorblades.! Everybody sell on margin!!!!!!!



1036. Post 5963969 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

The snap back could be huge. Remember that whale-led short squeeze to $710?



1037. Post 5964261 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: oyvinds on March 29, 2014, 08:44:09 AM
It is apparent that there is still a lot more margin longs looking for the exit compared to the amount of shorts. It is also worth mentioning that the price broke down from the secret descending triangle and now we are seeing daily closes below it.

That's why a snap back would be so epic. All those shorts forcing to cover as they get their margin calls, cascading  would drive the price up to heaven. Longs have relatively mush less effect in the event of another panic.



1038. Post 5965040 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

It'll be interesting to see what the bears cook up this weekend to mount a charge. How much territory are they going to gain before the counterattack pushes them into the red. They have made a lot of money and some are starting to feel invincible. That's just where we want them. 



1039. Post 5965491 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Bulls, get ready for a counterattack. The battle for $500 is not yet won. It's not the ground you can take that wins the day. It's the ground you can hold.



1040. Post 5977887 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

A weekend dip to 480 by Saturday night, not even seriously testing $466 resistance. We are on the way back up. An official denial of the rumor by the PBoC (should that happen) should take us to $540 in the short run, close to $600 eventually provided no new disasters surface. 

I estimate this China ban is 90% priced in since rumors started four months ago, so even if it turns out to be true, the down side is much smaller than the potential upside if again it proves to be false. This is a good time to buy a small amount, IMHO.

Probability the story is fake or just plain wrong I estimate to be 51%, based on no confirmations yet by anybody, despite a market plunge and four days of looking.






1041. Post 5978108 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on March 30, 2014, 01:53:13 AM
The last time windjc and seleme were that agressive we were around 800$
Where´s Billie Jean btw? Busy buyin up all those cheap coins :-D

What part of "I am short" did you not comprehend?

Billy is selling his soul for more fiat, to then lock it into btc.

I really need to get to buying.. or sending money.. but I am some what content with my stash.. but 2 years from now I don't want to be saying I should have bought more on the dips.

I already sold my soul. That's what leverage is. I am leveraged long beyond all reason and sanity. There's a very real albeit improbable chance that a flash crash unrelated to fundamentals will trigger a margin call and wipe me out, but several smarter richer people will go down first if that happens.



1042. Post 5978531 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: Xell on March 30, 2014, 05:00:40 AM
An official denial of the rumor by the PBoC (should that happen) [...]
Hmm they had time to do that on Friday. Bitcoin is bad news for China, at least potentially. I think it's very believable they will try to get rid.


They officially denied a rumor a week earlier. I'm sure they think they have better things to do than deny every rumor that comes along. They had time to confirm on Frday also and they didn't do that.



1043. Post 5978762 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: Xell on March 30, 2014, 05:24:43 AM
They officially denied a rumor a week earlier. I'm sure they think they have better things to do than deny every rumor that comes along. They had time to confirm on Frday also and they didn't do that.
Maybe but note that that this 'rumour' was in Chinese news, and also that rumour-spreading online is illegal in China. You wouldn't expect them to deny every online rumour by Tom Dick & Harry but when it's published in the news there is much more reason to consider making a statement, no?

I expect they will likely make a statement one way or the other this Monday or Tuesday. The market is down because of uncertainty. A confirmation may even paradoxically cause the market to go up once the uncertainty is removed. It took a while, but that's what happened when Silk Road got busted.

Just keep in mind that these rumors have been going around for four months. Gox rumors turned out to be true, so this might also. It's a real possibility, just less likely than the market has priced in, in my opinion.




1044. Post 5978841 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 30, 2014, 03:58:42 AM
A weekend dip to 480 by Saturday night, not even seriously testing $466 resistance. We are on the way back up. An official denial of the rumor by the PBoC (should that happen) should take us to $540 in the short run, close to $600 eventually provided no new disasters surface. 

I estimate this China ban is 90% priced in since rumors started four months ago, so even if it turns out to be true, the down side is much smaller than the potential upside if again it proves to be false. This is a good time to buy a small amount, IMHO.

Probability the story is fake or just plain wrong I estimate to be 51%, based on no confirmations yet by anybody, despite a market plunge and four days of looking.

Once again, I was too early. We were all expecting this test of support, so my gut was right and my second guess was wrong. There may even be a test of $400 support if $466 doesn't hold.

Now we get to see who's smarter than me and waited to buy.



1045. Post 5982276 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

The chart looks like two people stepped on land mines. Short sellers gotta wonder how many more are out there.



1046. Post 5982699 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: oyvinds on March 30, 2014, 12:22:52 PM
The chart looks like two people stepped on land mines. Short sellers gotta wonder how many more are out there.

lol you're pretty transparent in your desperate attempts at arguing why the price would go up. It really shines through that you're in a bad big long position that you are looking to exit.

Have you even looked at the actual stats I shared a few posts back? Shorts are reducing their positions not adding. We are taking profit since we, unlike you, have a profit not a loss.

You're such a beta, I bet you don't even lift. Keep posting, btw, I'd put you on ignore for our pure stupidity but watching you loose money is too fun.

Wow, such hostility. Must have touched a nerve. It's only a loss if I close my position or get a margin call. The profits are in the single and double digit coins I bought and put into cold storage.



1047. Post 5983520 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: bizz on March 30, 2014, 01:24:15 PM
I wasn't looking at charts from more than 24h -- and I must say it is not so baaad Smiley not very good ... but situation is under control IMO Smiley

It may soon get out of control if those long bfx margin calls start triggering.

bfx shorts are going to cover/take profits too. I'm counting on them to save me. Fool's hope, maybe. We'll see.



1048. Post 5984743 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: dnaleor on March 30, 2014, 02:23:38 PM
All that bearish sentiment. I get the same feeling as in the summer of 2013:



Keep calm and HODL Wink

edit:

130 USD ~ 720-800 USD
65 USD ~ 400-450 USD


I agree and I'm holding, but even through we've been through this several times, it's scary as hell.



1049. Post 5985006 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Why is Huobi higher than Stamp if China is dying? The perpetrators of this latest misinformation buying? 



1050. Post 5985605 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: T.Stuart on March 30, 2014, 03:39:22 PM
TERA has been suspiciously quiet.

Suspiciously? You mean he's something to do with all this?

She said she wanted to take the weekend off. I suspect those two explosions at $465 and $467 was her covering her short positions.



1051. Post 5985701 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: Zule on March 30, 2014, 03:47:15 PM
Whats the price that the longs will begin to close on?
Im guessing that there are a lot of 520 longs with 2.5 on bfx and that would be force terminated around 400ish or something...

That's why I only went 2:1 long. I wanted a margin call to be below major resistance.



1052. Post 5985936 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: igorr on March 30, 2014, 04:01:21 PM

Fake wall

tsunami incoming!




1053. Post 5989050 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Seems like there wasn't enough coins changing hands for that to be the final bottom. Bears retreated before they even got close to $400. Looking at that order book, it's easy to see why. Looks like we're gonna need some kind of official confirmation or denial of the China rumor before either side can gain more momentum.




1054. Post 5993824 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

http://orymh.bandcamp.com/track/the-bitcoin-rally-song

W00t! 

Bears are in retreat. We have an actual rally going on. now all we need is some volume to give this thing momentum.



1055. Post 5994951 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

What are the chances that any FUD we get tomorrow will be shrugged off as an April Fool's joke?



1056. Post 5999695 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on March 31, 2014, 11:00:44 AM

Explanation

Amazing. Bad news confirmed and I've never seen the order book so lopsided. This market looks like a coiled spring.



1057. Post 5999722 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: John999 on March 31, 2014, 11:26:56 AM
Has anyones Bitstamp wire been credited yet? Noramlly in by now  Undecided

when did u send?

Early Friday, but Ive often had deposits credited within a few hours...

My deposit (SEPA) from friday hasn't been credited yet either. But I've noticed that Bitstamp has become a bit slower with SEPA deposits recently unfortunately.

I have noticed that as well.

It's possible that they are getting so many deposits right now that they are falling behind.



1058. Post 6013345 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: TERA on April 01, 2014, 04:16:28 AM
Nice little wall at 350-450 has formed. This might give us another 1-4 weeks before 400 is broken, and maybe even a bulltrap to 550 or so where the next shorting opportunity will be.

Even TERA thinks we could go to $550 soon!



1059. Post 6013636 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

If things keep changing, TERA, then things could change again and make you bullish.



1060. Post 6014102 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

The Walls on Bitfinex are moving up from ~$400 to ~$412



1061. Post 6014838 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Just spiked to $509.48 on Bitfinex!



1062. Post 6015015 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: bamsbamx on April 01, 2014, 08:29:49 AM
BUY OR NOT BUY?HuhHuhHuhHuh   Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Wait. It'll go down some and you can get a better price. So people are going to take their profits now and some nervous people think this is a good exit point.



1063. Post 6015232 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: TERA on April 01, 2014, 08:49:42 AM
damn that was crazy. half of my standing short orders got hit. i was down at one point and thought the bulls had gotten one by me but now im up 4%.

I'm curious as to where you are going to close those shorts on the way down. This is what some people don't understand. Bears actually help to prevent crashes when they take their profits and close short positions. It's bulls with leverage getting margin calls that really make it tank.



1064. Post 6015781 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Unlike other corrections, we were hit with a double whammy this time: Gox and China. $450 is almost certainly going to be retested. There wasn't enough volume for that to have been likely the last of the selling. I'm a bull and I'm leveraged long, but be realistic. You guys will get another shot at cheap (oh, excuse the fuck out of me, TERA) relatively lower-priced coinz.



1065. Post 6015986 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: TERA on April 01, 2014, 09:14:56 AM
damn what a dumb move closing that short with peanuts for profit.

That wasn't your problem. You did very well there. The problem was that you didn't have enough coins to short because you didn't load up enough below $450.



1066. Post 6016255 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: TERA on April 01, 2014, 10:01:30 AM
damn what a dumb move closing that short with peanuts for profit.

That wasn't your problem. You did very well there. The problem was that you didn't have enough coins to short because you didn't load up enough below $450.
On bfx you can use USD as collateral to short. I actually could have shorted about 8 times more than I did.

Didn't know that. I'm still new there. Isn't that like naked short-selling? I mean there still has to be someone willing to lend you the coins in a swap, right?

You had to pay a swap cost, I'm assuming. That means if you had a huge pile of coins, you could lend them out without exchange rate risk. Another benefit of having a big stash. The risk isn't any higher than keeping fiat on the exchange.




1067. Post 6022540 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

When Mt Gox was dying, the market slid for months. When they stopped accepting deposits (for the last time), the market crashed to $400 and immediately rebounded to $710.
The slide from $710 to $436 was because the eventual banning of BTC exchanges was being priced in. There was some confirmation of this with two small exchanges that took us from $486 back down to $440.  

Markets hate uncertainty more than they hate bad news. Bad news can be priced in. Uncertainty by it's very nature cannot.  What is certain is that when and if a final confirmation from the PBoC comes out or Chinese exchanges stop accepting deposits, the China Syndrome will be behind us and other factors will dominate price action.


The time to buy is when things are at their worst, when things can't get any worse. The irony is that Wall Street money will likely not come in until after we sell. If we never sell, it could take them months, years or eternity. Wall street doesn't want to share our success. They want to take our success from us. They're not angels. They are vultures. The only way to keep them out is to bootstrap another rally without them, have them buy in and we slowly and methodically take profits on the way up.  It would require a level of support at least twice as high as what's on our current order books.

The two external possibilities that can save us are an official denial by the PBoC of an imminent bitcoin ban or a influx of billionaire whale money. Both are very possible but unlikely.  As a community, the way we can save ourselves is for The Bottom to be defended on very high volume. Next dip below $550, buy like crazy and don't sell till you see $100 profit. That dip will come unless a whale intervenes. There will be no organic rally without another defense of the bottom.

Disclosure: I'm not talking my book here. I'm trapped in a leveraged long position and resigned to either sell at a profit or get wiped out in a margin call. I got screwed because I thought the PBoC would either confirm or deny the rumor by now. They claim to be concerned for the welfare of speculators and consumers and then keep us in the dark. I guess that's what we should expect from banksters.



1068. Post 6023029 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

China likely won't criminalize ownership for a long time, if ever. What they can do is make it difficult for the Chinese people to buy bitcoins. As the current price is not a function of current utility, but a discounted expectation of future price, this could lead to a drop in price. The knowledge of less money flowing into bitcoinisphere from the Middle Kingdom is a downward pressure on price.

If I had billions, I would be pouring it into Bitcoin now, but I don't. If I had millions, I would be building walls around support at $400 to $450 (but I don't).

The utility of Bitcoin is still  increasing rapidly. The system is anti-fragile and will survive and grow, but it will  not be overnight and bitcoin profit will be earned- not given to you. 



1069. Post 6023254 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: bassclef on April 01, 2014, 08:25:53 PM
When Mt Gox was dying, the market slid for months. When they stopped accepting deposits (for the last time), the market crashed to $400 and immediately rebounded to $710.
The slide from $710 to $436 was because the eventual banning of BTC exchanges was being priced in. There was some confirmation of this with two small exchanges that took us from $486 back down to $440.

Yep, a double-whammy capitulation event. I think the worst may be behind us, the community having learned a tough lesson by a proper Goxxing and telling the Chinese to get onboard or get off the boat.

I wish that I could definitively say that final capitulation took place, but we won't know until support gets defended on higher volume. We need higher lows on increasing volume and that's not happening (yet).  I still wouldn't want to be a bear now. The knowledge that any one of thousands of people could blow the lid off price with a market buy that soaks up all liquidity in a flash would make me even more nervous than I am.

$19 Billion for What's Ap?  



1070. Post 6024080 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 01, 2014, 09:20:00 PM
When Mt Gox was dying, the market slid for months. When they stopped accepting deposits (for the last time), the market crashed to $400 and immediately rebounded to $710.
The slide from $710 to $436 was because the eventual banning of BTC exchanges was being priced in. There was some confirmation of this with two small exchanges that took us from $486 back down to $440.  

Markets hate uncertainty more than they hate bad news. Bad news can be priced in. Uncertainty by it's very nature cannot.  What is certain is that when and if a final confirmation from the PBoC comes out or Chinese exchanges stop accepting deposits, the China Syndrome will be behind us and other factors will dominate price action.


The time to buy is when things are at their worst, when things can't get any worse. The irony is that Wall Street money will likely not come in until after we sell. If we never sell, it could take them months, years or eternity. Wall street doesn't want to share our success. They want to take our success from us. They're not angels. They are vultures. The only way to keep them out is to bootstrap another rally without them, have them buy in and we slowly and methodically take profits on the way up.  It would require a level of support at least twice as high as what's on our current order books.

The two external possibilities that can save us are an official denial by the PBoC of an imminent bitcoin ban or a influx of billionaire whale money. Both are very possible but unlikely.  As a community, the way we can save ourselves is for The Bottom to be defended on very high volume. Next dip below $550, buy like crazy and don't sell till you see $100 profit. That dip will come unless a whale intervenes. There will be no organic rally without another defense of the bottom.

Disclosure: I'm not talking my book here. I'm trapped in a leveraged long position and resigned to either sell at a profit or get wiped out in a margin call. I got screwed because I thought the PBoC would either confirm or deny the rumor by now. They claim to be concerned for the welfare of speculators and consumers and then keep us in the dark. I guess that's what we should expect from banksters.

Your attempt at concerted action is like herding cats..... I admire it, but really, I doubt you are gonna get people to engage in some mass buying campaign... b/c each of us is in a different position.. and maybe we do NOT have enough capital to buy, buy, buy.... I know the other strategy is to hodl and don't play the selling game..,..,. and that could cause prices to rise with smaller volume and cause a whale to come in that does NOT want to lose out on the upward momentum.....

You are correct about the intense bitterness that wallstreet likely has in regard to bitcoin investors and they are likely very reluctant to empower the "undeserving" early bitcoin adopters to make any high level(s) of profit.

I'm more of a weatherman than a rainmaker. I'm just saying that if we don't defend support and we don't get bailed out by a whale or two, then the bottom will not hold. People will do what's in their perceived best interest. OTOH, whales do exist and they could either defend the bottom with us minnows or negate the need for a defense at all. As always, the upside potential of bitcoin is greater than the downside risk. Just don't go leveraged long right now. I got that part covered.



1071. Post 6025169 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: Zule on April 01, 2014, 10:53:10 PM
So in other words they are forbiden to have mandatory sex with bitcoin?
Voluontary is just fine i guess

That which is not forbidden is mandatory! In the name of freedom, of course.



1072. Post 6044869 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 03, 2014, 01:21:31 AM
Here's hoping BJA either sold a little on the spike or found something to hock.

If the posted bids down to 400.01 were dumped at market, they would buy up to 490.76


I closed my margin long @ $478 and took a good pounding. My biggest loss ever. Note to self: Never hold a margin position overnight.



1073. Post 6045197 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

I think there are only two likely possibilities at this point: price is either going to go a lot lower or it's going to stay low for a long time. I am a permabull no longer. Long term bull, yes, but the time frame is months or years. This could very well be a 2011 scenario.

Sure, whales could turn it around, but retail speculators don't have enough cash left and volume is too low for a rational call of a trend reversal. The double whammy of Gox and China compounded each other. This would be a great time to buy if small investors understood the technology and acted rationally, but I see no evidence that this is the case.

There may be an infinite supply of fiat, but I don't have it. I doubt any of you do either. Price will have to retreat to a point where it becomes attractive to new investors ot stay where it's at long enough to build a new base. 




1074. Post 6045645 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on April 03, 2014, 03:00:37 AM

Explanation

Looks like we're going up $10-20 (NOT a trend reversal)



1075. Post 6045906 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: windjc on April 03, 2014, 03:39:21 AM
This is reversal territory. I'd say 50% chance of breaking 400, no more. (today)

The problem chessnut - and this what took me until about a week or two ago to realize - is that there just is not enough fresh fiat coming into the markets to stop the bear market. As a result we are just slow and steadily melting right down through all the "buy" orders between here and $380. Its like watching lava hit the ocean. It falls into the ocean and then a plume of steam rises (takes us up to the nearest fib retracement level) and then another piece of lava carries us back down with it.

And its not showing more resistance, its showing less. After we reached 710, we literally have had almost no buy action. No one wants to buy. No one is buying. And traders who set buys at <$420, then can't make the market go up, they just create the steam we see rising up every once in a while.

Bitcoin may not be cheap again until $250 (or less). You need to really brace yourself for the possibility. Otherwise all you are going to catch short term is steam.

I'm not as bearish as this, but close. Fresh fiat could come in at any time, but it's not likely. Until it does, every bounce is a selling opportunity. We don't know how low it's going to go, but I'm saving MY fresh fiat for AFTER a clear trend reversal. Whales are the only thing that can turn it around. Not even another Cyprus event could change things by itself. I would love to be wrong.



1076. Post 6046270 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

We need a really big whale or a whole a pod of medium whales. We can't bootstrap a turnaround taking each other's money. Even a Cyprus event would need a catalyst.

It's an axiom that unless something changes, the situation won't change. If $400 support isn't tested on higher volume, there will likely be no trend reversal for months. We'll go sideways. If $400 doesn't hold, we'll plummet until hidden support is found somewhere in the depths. This is gut check time.



1077. Post 6046503 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: seleme on April 03, 2014, 04:47:07 AM
Lets face it guys we're a bit fucked. The bottom line is that all money in Bitcoin eventually needs to move through the exchanges and people aren't willing to trust the exchanges. So all that BTC thats gone may affect the price upwards in the uber long term due to lack of supply, but if there isn't a safe way to express demand, supply matters not. We'll recover but this might be another 2 year ride (no guarantees, but it seems like a real possibility). I sat through one I can sit through another though, I guess.

Meh, trust in exchanges means f'all. If few whales start a bubble you'll see people in line begging to send their money to exchanges.

Good old greed beats any trust problems.

Who's going to be the whale? The macroeconomic picture is that the Federal Reserve is tapering the quantitative easing even as real employment (labor force participation) weakens. There's likely to be a mad scramble for cash and whales will have their hands full with their other investments.

When the tide goes out, you discover who's been swimming naked. The only whale I know with massive cash on hand is Warren Buffet and he's not coming to save us.



1078. Post 6046942 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Possibilities for bitcoin going to zero: a flaw in the code is found and exploited. Something on the mining end. Nuclear war, asteroids, global ebola pandemic, something on the mining end, sha256 getting cracked, etc. Probability of any of these things happening <0.1%.

Possibilities for Bitcoin going below $10: Satoshi's stash getting dumped on the market, outright criminal ban on owning bitcoin in several Western countries, Bitstamp and at least one other major exchange getting hacked to the point of insolvency, FBI coins AND Bitcoin investment Trust AND Winklevoss stash all liquidated, or >ten major early adopter whales liquidating their entire stashes. probability of any of these things happening: <1%

Possibility of bitcoin retreating to April 2013 high of $266:  $400 support doesn't hold when all Chinese exchanges stop taking deposits, China bans bitcoin ownership and trading altogether, U.S. stockmarket crash/correction that dries up Silicone Valley money, Coinbase folds, etc. Probability: ~40%

Possibility of trend reversal without whales: 1%. with whales: ~40%

Possibility that Bitcoin goes to $10,000 this year: hyperinflation in the U.S. Dollar, major currency or banking crisis in a large economy with Bitcoin as a major player in evading capital controls or inflation hedging, Google, Facebook, Microsoft or other major tech company fully embraces bitcoin, investing billions. Probability: ~5%.

Possibility of spontaneous mass adoption this year with no major media campaign or sea change in media coverage: zero. Next year, maybe. Movements need leaders.

I'm loaded in BTC and mostly holding, but it could get really really ugly. again.








1079. Post 6046998 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: Wary on April 03, 2014, 05:24:53 AM
We need a really big whale or a whole a pod of medium whales. We can't bootstrap a turnaround taking each other's money. Even a Cyprus event would need a catalyst.

It's an axiom that unless something changes, the situation won't change. If $400 support isn't tested on higher volume, there will likely be no trend reversal for months. We'll go sideways. If $400 doesn't hold, we'll plummet until hidden support is found somewhere in the depths. This is gut check time.
What happened July last year, when price went from 65 to 90? What had changed then?
I reckon the only things that had changed were expectations, from "it will go down" to "it will go up". It was enough.

The equivalent of $65 to $90 would be from $400 to only $553 and then five months of mostly trickle-up sideways action before the next rally. That's a realistic possibility, but I'm not certain if it's probable. 



1080. Post 6047105 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: BBmodBB on April 03, 2014, 06:02:28 AM
Possibilities for bitcoin going to zero: a flaw in the code is found and exploited. Something on the mining end. Nuclear war, asteroids, global ebola pandemic, something on the mining end, sha256 getting cracked, etc. Probability of any of these things happening <0.1%.

Possibilities for Bitcoin going below $10: Satoshi's stash getting dumped on the market, outright criminal ban on owning bitcoin in several Western countries, Bitstamp and at least one other major exchange getting hacked to the point of insolvency, FBI coins AND Bitcoin investment Trust AND Winklevoss stash all liquidated, or >ten major early adopter whales liquidating their entire stashes. probability of any of these things happening: <1%

Possibility of bitcoin retreating to April 2013 high of $266:  $400 support doesn't hold when all Chinese exchanges stop taking deposits, China bans bitcoin ownership and trading altogether, U.S. stockmarket crash/correction that dries up Silicone Valley money, Coinbase folds, etc. Probability: ~40%

Possibility of trend reversal without whales: 1%. with whales: ~40%

Possibility that Bitcoin goes to $10,000 this year: hyperinflation in the U.S. Dollar, major currency or banking crisis in a large economy with Bitcoin as a major player in evading capital controls or inflation hedging, Google, Facebook, Microsoft or other major tech company fully embraces bitcoin, investing billions. Probability: ~5%.

Possibility of spontaneous mass adoption this year with no major media campaign or sea change in media coverage: zero. Next year, maybe. Movements need leaders.

I'm loaded in BTC and mostly holding, but it could get really really ugly. again.


i want to support the cause, however i've found that this community is at least as greedy as the Wall street bandits~ maybe even worse!!! =O *how many you still got?lolll

There's nothing wrong with being greedy. There's something very wrong with stacking the deck and playing a rigged game like Wall Street does. Bitcoin is as free market as it gets. The risks and opportunities are much greater. No Bernanke put. No high frequency front-running. No government bail-outs.

Wall street is full of suckers and sharks. Bitcoin is full of minnows and whales. Degenerate gamblers are found everywhere.



1081. Post 6047227 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: seleme on April 03, 2014, 05:11:27 AM
Cheer up guys Bitcoin still has a lot of gas left in the tank. No way these big time BTC startups don't at least punch back.

Yeah, and people still have guts to call this to be possible 2011 with such difference in fundamentals. I could cry reading that, really.

Possible isn't the same as probable. We don't know how well capitalized many of these start-ups actually are. We also don't know what could happen in the macroeconomy or regulatory environment that could stall a recovery. These are real risks even if they are not probabilities.



1082. Post 6047512 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on April 03, 2014, 06:45:25 AM
And there we go. People are about to panic that 400 might fall so they are starting to sell.
It's a matter of waiting for the first 500+ sell and down we go. The sheep will go nuts.
350 within 12 hours is my worthless prediction.

Yes the $400 wall is likely to be tested to see if it's fake, real or there's hidden support we can't see. This would be a huge opportunity for a billionaire to accumulate a large position without slippage, but there may not be one or he's lurking in the depths. Retreat to $400 and hold the line, people. $401 if you want to make sure you get all your coins back. Sell any bounce and build that fucking wall. It's going to be a battle and we need every man we can get. If it breaches, the next stop is $266 and the next ATH will be delayed by months.  90% probability we'll drop to at least $401 at least once before trend reversal. 50% chance we'll hit $400 and 50% chance we'll go lower.



1083. Post 6048194 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 03, 2014, 07:12:55 AM
Possible isn't the same as probable.

Pessimism isn't wisdom.  If you think there's a reason to assign low probability, that would be helpful to articulate.

Quote
We don't know how well capitalized many of these start-ups actually are.

True.  We do know how well capitalized several of them are, however.  It's very similar to the Internet in the 90s.  Stuff is all over the map.  That kind of diversity is messy, and healthy.  Some degree of confidence that the population will produce survivors is provided by large numbers.

Quote
We also don't know what could happen in the macroeconomy or regulatory environment that could stall a recovery. These are real risks even if they are not probabilities.

Ignorance is not risk.  Structural vulnerability is a source of risk, though.  Macro is going to go to hell in a hand-basket.  QE can mask the underlying cancer with a high fever, but the patient is still terminal.  That implies both volatility and a strong upward path for BTC.

The regulatory front is pricing-benign (freedom-malignant), but also it can be routed around.  Uncertainties here are few.

I think you underestimate the strength of the fundamental trend, and the inexorable power of the price attractors.  It's like if there were no reason for BTC to go up, one would have to be invented, just to keep the universe from annihilating itself with a contradiction.

Is there a fair chance of a sustained price dip?  Yes.  Do I think it will happen?  Not beyond my ability to manage the mark-to-market risk by trading the volatility.


Wisdom is perceived as pessimism by the overly optimistic. I think the risks are higher than you do, but I don't think they are probable. There's no possibility of another flash dip to $400 and quick recovery because we are already there and there is no volume. I am hoping a test of $400 on volume will spring a bear trap, but support may waver if it's seriously tested. If $400 holds, there will be likely be plenty of volatility range trading until the whales who are lurking in the depths give up their hope for cheaper coins and get on board.

Ignorance is not risk, but it prevents you from accurately pricing risk. The future is not only unknown but unknowable. You can be ignorant in this game and still make money if you know that you are ignorant and do what the smart people do. The problem is that it's difficult to tell who's smart until after the fact. 

I have no confidence anymore in my ability to day trade. My margin trade wiped out all my day trading profits for the year and I'm lucky to have not gotten wiped out completely. Fortunately all that money originally came from buying and holding long term, so that's what I'm going back to until I can afford more day trading "tuition". This is the best time to buy in the last four months. Coming from me, that may be a sell signal, what the hell do I know? Don't trade long term on a short term trend and don't trade short term on a long term trend. It cost me $6000 to discover that. I don't want anybody else to make the same mistake. The down trend will continue until all the weak hands are shaken out. Volume tells us that hasn't happened yet, but volume could be misleading.

I'm not bearish right now. I'm not bullish. I just don't fuckin know. I am humbled.



1084. Post 6048220 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 03, 2014, 08:08:37 AM
And there we go. People are about to panic that 400 might fall so they are starting to sell.
It's a matter of waiting for the first 500+ sell and down we go. The sheep will go nuts.
350 within 12 hours is my worthless prediction.

Yes the $400 wall is likely to be tested to see if it's fake, real or there's hidden support we can't see. This would be a huge opportunity for a billionaire to accumulate a large position without slippage, but there may not be one or he's lurking in the depths. Retreat to $400 and hold the line, people. $401 if you want to make sure you get all your coins back. Sell any bounce and build that fucking wall. It's going to be a battle and we need every man we can get. If it breaches, the next stop is $266 and the next ATH will be delayed by months.  90% probability we'll drop to at least $401 at least once before trend reversal. 50% chance we'll hit $400 and 50% chance we'll go lower.


Maybe I need a definition of terms; however, my understanding is that a billionaire does NOT gain a position by selling into a buy wall but instead by buying into a sell wall.  So, I must be missing something, here.

Either could happen if the wall is real.



1085. Post 6048316 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

One thing I do know: if you're a weak hand, if you're too scared or nervous, GTFO. We won't reverse this down trend until every last one of you motherfuckers sell.

If you are waiting on the sidelines or are considering making the plunge, realize this is bloodsport. I guarantee your metal will be tested. Shit's gonna get real.



1086. Post 6048416 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: dreamspark on April 03, 2014, 08:17:56 AM


Wisdom is perceived as pessimism by the overly optimistic. I think the risks are higher than you do, but I don't think they are probable. There's no possibility of another flash dip to $400 and quick recovery because we are already there and there is no volume. I am hoping a test of $400 on volume will spring a bear trap, but support may waver if it's seriously tested. If $400 holds, there will be likely be plenty of volatility range trading until the whales who are lurking in the depths give up their hope for cheaper coins and get on board.

Ignorance is not risk, but it prevents you from accurately pricing risk. The future is not only unknown but unknowable. You can be ignorant in this game and still make money if you know that you are ignorant and do what the smart people do. The problem is that it's difficult to tell who's smart until after the fact. 

I have no confidence anymore in my ability to day trade. My margin trade wiped out all my day trading profits for the year and I'm lucky to have not gotten wiped out completely. Fortunately all that money originally came from buying and holding long term, so that's what I'm going back to until I can afford more day trading "tuition". This is the best time to buy in the last four months. Coming from me, that may be a sell signal, what the hell do I know? Don't trade long term on a short term trend and don't trade short term on a long term trend. It cost me $6000 to discover that. I don't want anybody else to make the same mistake. The down trend will continue until all the weak hands are shaken out. Volume tells us that hasn't happened yet, but volume could be misleading.

I'm not bearish right now. I'm not bullish. I just don't fuckin know. I am humbled.

That must have been a serious position to be wiped out on margin? Were you not able to deposit more just to cover than position due the general likelihood that even if its not in the next few weeks we are going back up at some point?

It was my whole stack and it was getting chewed up in swap fees. I couldn't afford to hold it for weeks. In a tie, I would still lose. It was a rookie margin trading mistake. My first fuckin day on Bitfinex and I ran into a buzz saw. I managed to save the lion's share, but losing 6 grand hurts. Margin trading is a different animal. Three ways a smart man can lose money: Liquor, Ladies, and Leverage.



1087. Post 6048594 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Only two kind of buyers right now: people betting on a short squeeze and people buying and holding long term.  When we are this close to major support and the down trend is this strong, any spike is likely to get slammed back down. The trend won't reverse unless support is breached or defended with massive volume.



1088. Post 6048701 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 03, 2014, 08:50:14 AM


You have described my situation more or less.. he he he he ... . but I am NOT selling... except a little here and there when there may be some obvious downward action.. I do expect to be in the black at some point in the near future.. but i have patience to wait it out for a couple of years if needed and continue to buy and to dollar cost average and maybe trade a little if there seems some fairly obvious upside potential.

so your not selling except when there may be some obvious downward action? what do you think the last couple of months have been?!  Cheesy

hindsight is 20/20...   

Even though I can see you are missing my point, I will provide further explanation. 

I am NOT going to lock in losses, when the direction of the market is NOT clear to me and when my whole portfolio happens to be in the red.

I can already anticipate that you are going to want to do battle with this - b/c you seem to be assuming that the price direction was obvious.. which it was NOT.

How is the direction not clear to you? There is only one chart showing an uptrend now and that's the four year log chart. The odds of a whale hitting "market buy" at this time is infinitesimal unless he wants to see a short squeeze for shits and giggles and wants to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for the privilege. Whale limit orders near $400 are the OPTIMISTIC scenario.



1089. Post 6050312 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: TERA on April 03, 2014, 10:55:01 AM
quick someone cook up some 'hot news' so we can have an epic bulltrap for me to short.

I'll be shorting with you this time (actually selling-no more margin trading for me for a while).  We need to defend $400 and need fiat to do it.



1090. Post 6050347 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 03, 2014, 11:01:58 AM
this could easily be the beginning of a $100 move. The Chinese customers will be going to bed. no more panic selling for the next 10 hours.
then in eleven hours you'll see a dump that'll take us back to where we are or lower.



1091. Post 6051250 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Guys, nobody would be happier if I am wrong than I would be. It's extremely likely we'll either go sideways for a long time or down. If we go down, $400 support will be tested and may or may not hold. 3600 coins mined per day on top of Chinese arbitragers constantly buying on Huobi, and selling on Stamp. There's simply too much liquidity to soak up without a strategic retreat in price.

It's a great time to buy if you don't mind waiting months or years to see a significant profit, but a rocket ride up past $500 before April 15 is delusional, unless there's possibly a spike that immediately crashes back down. Bitfinex walls keep moving, but the Bitstamp wall is staying solid and immovable at $400.



1092. Post 6051573 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: hdbuck on April 03, 2014, 12:52:40 PM
Guys, nobody would be happier if I am wrong than I would be. It's extremely likely we'll either go sideways for a long time or down. If we go down, $400 support will be tested and may or may not hold. 3600 coins mined per day on top of Chinese arbitragers constantly buying on Huobi, and selling on Stamp. There's simply too much liquidity to soak up without a strategic retreat in price.

It's a great time to buy if you don't mind waiting months or years to see a significant profit, but a rocket ride up past $500 before April 15 is delusional, unless there's possibly a spike that immediately crashes back down. Bitfinex walls keep moving, but the Bitstamp wall is staying solid and immovable at $400.


What makes you think the 3600 coins mined everyday end up on exchanges? I'm sure many of these are from miners who believe in the long term potential of Bitcoin, and won't sell at these low prices.

selling coins at those rate would not be enough to ROI anyway. so yea, freshly minted coins are less likely to hit exchanges when price is down.

True, but many miners have been holding coins for four months and may need to sell some to pay bills. Many holders have to sell small amounts to pay bills. There is a cumulative effect. If enough people just sell and buy back $25 cheaper, taking profits in BTC rather than fiat over and over for two weeks,, we could turn this around. Unfortunately, crowds don't behave like that. Armies do.



1093. Post 6051779 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: dreamspark on April 03, 2014, 01:10:11 PM
Guys, nobody would be happier if I am wrong than I would be. It's extremely likely we'll either go sideways for a long time or down. If we go down, $400 support will be tested and may or may not hold. 3600 coins mined per day on top of Chinese arbitragers constantly buying on Huobi, and selling on Stamp. There's simply too much liquidity to soak up without a strategic retreat in price.

It's a great time to buy if you don't mind waiting months or years to see a significant profit, but a rocket ride up past $500 before April 15 is delusional, unless there's possibly a spike that immediately crashes back down. Bitfinex walls keep moving, but the Bitstamp wall is staying solid and immovable at $400.


I know opinions change and this isn't a low blow particularly but you really must be taking your forced liquidation badly. Two days ago it was choo choo and now your saying that anyone buying coins here would have to wait years for a profit.

What's changed in a day or so?

I wasn't force liquidated although I might have been close by now if I had held. I saved thousands by wimping out at $478. Cutting your losses when the market turns against you is an essential part of trading. Just reading this forum, it is obvious that all of the weak hands have not been shaken out.



1094. Post 6052195 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: dreamspark on April 03, 2014, 01:34:32 PM
Guys, nobody would be happier if I am wrong than I would be. It's extremely likely we'll either go sideways for a long time or down. If we go down, $400 support will be tested and may or may not hold. 3600 coins mined per day on top of Chinese arbitragers constantly buying on Huobi, and selling on Stamp. There's simply too much liquidity to soak up without a strategic retreat in price.

It's a great time to buy if you don't mind waiting months or years to see a significant profit, but a rocket ride up past $500 before April 15 is delusional, unless there's possibly a spike that immediately crashes back down. Bitfinex walls keep moving, but the Bitstamp wall is staying solid and immovable at $400.


I know opinions change and this isn't a low blow particularly but you really must be taking your forced liquidation badly. Two days ago it was choo choo and now your saying that anyone buying coins here would have to wait years for a profit.

What's changed in a day or so?

I wasn't force liquidated although I might have been close by now if I had held. I saved thousands by wimping out at $478. Cutting your losses when the market turns against you is an essential part of trading. Just reading this forum, it is obvious that all of the weak hands have not been shaken out.

Okay fair enough I read it that you were forced liquidated. Well yeah obviously that's a good trade then but that still doesn't explain what you feel has changed in the last two days from being bullish to now super besrish . I'm just interested not calling you out . I don't think the forum sentiment has changed in the last two days...

That's my whole point. Nothing's changed but me. The down trend is still in effect. I wouldn't even call myself super-bearish. I still hold out hope that $400 will hold. TERA makes infinitely more profit than me and she thinks I'm a starry-eyed optimist.



1095. Post 6066162 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

As long as Huobi is running substantially below Bitstamp price, there is downward pressure through arbitrage. Miners coins are piling up and they are wondering how long they have to wait to sell them at a profit. Many of us long term holders are feeling the pinch of no BTC income for four months. These are the bearish factors that put me in 50/50 crypto/BTC, as bearish as I have ever been.

There can be no sustained rally until some other factors outweigh the downward pressure. There will be no Chinese reversal without a policy change from the PBoC because the uncertainty and possibility of the ban on bank deposits being enforced.  If the ban is aggressively enforced, $400 level will be seriously tested and may not hold.

The two most likely scenarios for the next two weeks are either down or sideways. I have two limit buy orders north of the $400 wall to aid in the defense, but also two sell orders south of $500 to trade any bull trap. I'm keeping some fiat in reserve in the event of the very real but unlikely event of a punch through $400 and a free fall to near $266, the top of last April's rally. I estimate the odds of this disaster to be 40% and many think I am too optimistic.

I just don't see Big Money getting on board until a solid uptrend is established or at least something that reasonably passes for stability.



1096. Post 6067687 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Another way to look at it is this: if you buy into my sell orders, you'll be buying coins that I picked up for ~$10 three years ago. Those coins might make you money, but not as much as they made me.  If price rockets to $600, $700, or higher, you'll still be buying my coins. I guarantee you'll run out of fiat before I run out of bitcoin, Suckers.



1097. Post 6067784 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 04, 2014, 12:05:40 PM
Another way to look at it is this: if you buy into my sell orders, you'll be buying coins that I picked up for ~$10 three years ago. Those coins might make you money, but not as much as they made me.  If price rockets to $600, $700, or higher, you'll still be buying my coins. I guarantee you'll run out of fiat before I run out of bitcoin, Suckers.

when you bought at 550, I thought that was a good move, if not overly ambitious. but why the change? we stalled at the floor and you are bearish now? all the problems in china are short term.

If market conditions change, then my market outlook will change. Until then I'm not going to risk losing any more money. I may be a slow learner, but I've learned to cut my losses.



1098. Post 6067982 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on April 04, 2014, 12:14:05 PM
Another way to look at it is this: if you buy into my sell orders, you'll be buying coins that I picked up for ~$10 three years ago. Those coins might make you money, but not as much as they made me.  If price rockets to $600, $700, or higher, you'll still be buying my coins. I guarantee you'll run out of fiat before I run out of bitcoin, Suckers.

when you bought at 550, I thought that was a good move, if not overly ambitious. but why the change? we stalled at the floor and you are bearish now? all the problems in china are short term.
This process is called coin dissemination it's imperative for adoption, it's driven by understand or fear, regardless it's a bull signal even if it's small.

Good! Buy into my $460 sell order, buy again at my next one and the one after that. I need the money.



1099. Post 6068021 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: dreamspark on April 04, 2014, 12:17:32 PM
As a true believer though, at what point do you buy back. These people maybe buying your coins but your going to want them back if the price keeps rising. If your thoughts are well its pure profit and your not looking to put it back in to BTC then this is a weird time to be doing that.

I already said I'll buy back some to defend The $400 wall and I'll save some fiat for the plunge to $266 support if it falls. I am a true believer, but I made some dumb-ass trades and I might be a dumb-ass for being a true believer also.



1100. Post 6068078 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 04, 2014, 12:17:47 PM

If market conditions change, the my market outlook will change. Until then I'm not going to risk losing any more money.

but when your sell orders have been filled up to 700, the market will indeed be changed. the wedge will have broken upwards and the bubble will be looking very similar to the previous ones. dont let it pass you by.

As I said, I bought most of my coins for $10. I'm not that greedy. I'll share them all the way to the next market top. 



1101. Post 6068366 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: EvilPanda on April 04, 2014, 12:57:13 PM
Bitcoin will never rise again.
It just rose from $416 to $458, your statement is invalid Smiley

a 10% bounce after a 70% drop is not a change in trend. Keep in mind that if a market falls 50% and then bounces back up 50%, you're still 25% lower than where you started.

C'mon, you pussies, I lowered my buy order to $559 and still no takers. Where's all the "the worst is behind us" sentiment now?



1102. Post 6068498 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on April 04, 2014, 01:04:15 PM
who? what? despair? huh?


No, despair would be dumping my whole stack and cashing out rather than waiting for suckers to buy my overpriced coins. Despair was closing my leveraged long position at $478, losing over six thousand dollars and saving myself from getting wiped out. The hardest and best trade I've ever made. The worst trade was taking the leveraged long position in the first place in the face of the same market conditions we have right now.



1103. Post 6068571 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Asrael999 on April 04, 2014, 01:05:13 PM
Bitcoin will never rise again.
It just rose from $416 to $458, your statement is invalid Smiley

a 10% bounce after a 70% drop is not a change in trend. Keep in mind that if a market falls 50% and then bounces back up 50%, you're still 25% lower than where you started.

C'mon, you pussies, I lowered my buy order to $559 and still no takers. Where's all the "the worst is behind us" sentiment now?

You won't actually spot the change in trend until after it has happened - until then you will think it is a bulltrap.



I really hope you're right. If I miss the next rally, I'll be sitting in full fiat, go back to cold storage to get some more day trading money and apply the lessons I've learned.



1104. Post 6068638 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on April 04, 2014, 01:16:27 PM
who? what? despair? huh?


No, despair would be dumping my whole stack and cashing out rather than waiting for suckers to buy my overpriced coins. Despair was closing my leveraged long position at $478, losing over six thousand dollars and saving myself from getting wiped out. The hardest and best trade I've ever made. The worst trade was taking the leveraged long position in the first place in the face of the same market conditions we have right now.

Hubris can get this best of us at times, none the less I don't margin trade nor have the stomach for it. I might after I give a year of hodling its time.

I remember reading you we're going long I just didn't know why you chose to do that following gox on Chinese that we're semi confirmed.

It was following a rumor and an official denial by the PBoC a week earlier.  Buy the rumor, sell the news or in the case of bad news, sell the rumor and buy the news. That wasn't my mistake. My mistake was not paying attention to the technical indicators, the same indicators that are now saying a substantial move up is very unlikely in the near future.



1105. Post 6068858 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 04, 2014, 01:29:51 PM
why is everyone shorting the bottom?

Because it's not the bottom. You're damn lucky I sold earlier so that I can help stop the plunge when I buy back in lower. The bottom is in when all the weak hands have been shaken out and there's still too many assholes around here thinking a rocket ride to the next ATH is likely just around the corner. It may be just around the corner, but it's extremely improbable. Risk of a $400 wall breach has not been priced in and won't be for weeks or months unless the wall is actually tested on high volume.




1106. Post 6069098 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

That pit stop on the way down was caused by bears covering their short positions. Selling may not be over.



1107. Post 6073724 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Cross to the downside on the 1 hr moving average chart. All the purchases are driving prices nowhere. They are preventing a plummet. Turning bearish gave me the ability to act while being all-in only allowed me to sell. I am starting to revise my estimate of a $400 wall breach upwards from 40% to 45%. There appears to be much denial about how serious the situation is. any one of 100 people could increase their coin holdings by dumping 10K coins now and buying them back at $266-$310.



1108. Post 6074843 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: bitcoinsrus on April 04, 2014, 07:37:50 PM
billyjoeallen gone bearish

isn't this a strong buy signal?

Waffles, waffles.... Buy waffles



So I'm a contra-indicator now, huh? If I'm so stupid, then why do I have so much money and coins to trade now?

If you want my coins, just bid up the price a little higher. If you want my cash, you'll have to drive the price down until I feel like maybe maybe buying back. I hope there's a rally because I'll be partying with bull money if there is. Being a reckless bull for so long has given me a monster pile of coins to dump on your heads.

Disrespect me at your pleasure or peril. The market always has the last word.



1109. Post 6075269 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Yes, I'm clearly bonkers. Buy your asses off. I'm trying to do you assholes a favor, but if you don't listen, I will take your money. Fact: there will be no rally this weekend that doesn't result in me having thousands of dollars more than I do now.

On the other hand, if you are wrong and there is a market plunge, you're pissing off one of the few people left on the exchanges with cash to help save you.

Since when is 50/50 fiat/crypto not objective?



1110. Post 6075438 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 04, 2014, 09:29:19 PM
billyjoeallen gone bearish

isn't this a strong buy signal?

Waffles, waffles.... Buy waffles



So I'm a contra-indicator now, huh? If I'm so stupid, then why do I have so much money and coins to trade now?

If you want my coins, just bid up the price a little higher. If you want my cash, you'll have to drive the price down until I feel like maybe maybe buying back. I hope there's a rally because I'll be partying with bull money if there is. Being a reckless bull for so long has given me a monster pile of coins to dump on your heads.

Disrespect me at your pleasure or peril. The market always has the last word.


Those previous comments by Bitcoinsrus does NOT seem to be disrespectful, but instead merely an observation of your change in your apparent position.  Also, I do NOT perceive things like this thread to be a competition, even though others may consider it to be such... and that is why, when you perceive threads like this as a means to compete and to deceive people, then you are resorting to self-ish behavior...

Surely I am going to take information on this thread with a grain of salt, but my intention is to share information  for the benefit of everyone.. and to the extent that I may spin or NOT disclose my exact strategy will NOT be some major push to trick people into buying or selling in order to favor me or to fulfill some position that I have that I want filled.

We each have our ways... so to each his/her own in that regard.

Selfish behavior would be telling people what they want to hear so that I could be more popular. I'm doing the opposite. It's also in my financial best interest to say the opposite of what I'm saying.  I may  be wrong, but I'm not being deceptive, you piece of shit.



1111. Post 6075665 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on April 04, 2014, 09:38:49 PM
this bad boy is turning around. Prep rockets 3 and 4 for liftoff...

On this volume? You're insane. There's three thousand coins in limit asks between here and where I turned bearish. Hope you're right, though.



1112. Post 6075852 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 04, 2014, 09:57:45 PM
china to wake up in just a couple of hours. are they prepare for news?

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html

does China have to wake up everyday, last two days been almost painful stagnated Undecided

It would be a true blessing if china was stagnated. That would mean they have run out of coins to panic sell, and the west can resume pumping.

I saw a TV interview with one guy in China with over 100,000 BTC. He claimed he'd never sell. Maybe he won't.



1113. Post 6075916 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

You could buy 1000 BTC right now and price wouldn't be any higher than it was eight hours ago. I hope you do. I wish I had sold more back then. 



1114. Post 6076686 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 04, 2014, 11:16:34 PM
Yes, I'm clearly bonkers.

When you were an überbull, you were outspoken, brash, opinionated, politically incorrect in a charmingly egotistical way.  As bear, you're positively pre-menstrual.


Ok, how about this: We will likely all have the opportunity to buy sub $500 coins for a long time. We may even get the chance to buy them much cheaper. Yippee!I'm sorry if I'm peeing in your pool. I don't want to be right. It's just that when you ignore reality, reality has a way of turning up the volume.



1115. Post 6077233 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: octaft on April 04, 2014, 11:51:19 PM

Sure, but you could also wind up winning more. Depends on how bearish the bettors are.

It's better to wait to bet until the bet soon closes

Yeah, probably best to wait until the last minute since the payout is changing. I would never make a bet where the odds could change.

What do you think day trading is? That's exactly what we do.



1116. Post 6077490 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 05, 2014, 12:53:50 AM

If I had to guess, then I would guess that you bought from the top and that is the reason why you are so nervous at the moment..

Im holding from $100 average. never bought above 600. Im really not nervous at all. but perhaps a little irritable.....

High-five! all these damn people who don't believe that this is another trend reversal are irritating you aight? Sad

I'm holding From <$40 average and I think it's going down some more before recovering. Either that or we're stuck in limbo for months. Day trading is a different thing from long term investing.



1117. Post 6077623 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 05, 2014, 01:01:10 AM

I'm holding From <$40 average and I think it's going down some more before recovering. Either that or we're stuck in limbo for months. Day trading is a different thing from long term investing.

Limbo is a relative term here. we should expect a rapid climb to 700-800 in the coming weeks if this is a reversal.

That's a big "if". The only think known for sure is that the slide has been temporarily slowed down at expected resistance at the $400 Gox Low. I estimate we'd need at least ten million new dollars flowing into the exchanges to have a true reversal- otherwise we're just taking each other's money until the fees grind us to dust. IF I was a billionaire, I'd be dumping money into BTC like crazy right now, but I'm not. Billionaires don't make billions from giving money to people like us. They make billions from taking our money.

It's going to go sideways or down until the get rich crowd make way for the real players. That will require a lot of pain.



1118. Post 6077795 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 05, 2014, 01:25:38 AM


O.K.  Maybe I overstated the case, but why do you need to resort to name calling?  I'm just making an observation, and surely I could be wrong in my observation and noticing your seemingly extreme statements to push one way and then to push another way...... .. I am NOT engaging in such observation about your seeming to switch your position to undermine you or to bad mouth you... it just seems to be lacking some objective analysis... especially when you are saying let's all do this in order to save BTC from a downward spiral.. it just seems to be much too much to be trying to persuade people to act in concert, when it may NOT be a good idea for them... .. and it may NOT even seem to be a convincing logical choice to "save" bitcoin...  

Bitcoin doesn't need saving and it would be incredible hubris for to think I was even capable of doing so anyway. I was trying to only save the people reading this thread some money, and I resent you questioning my motives. You should know me better by now. I'm not some noob troll.

Doesn't mean I'm not wrong. All that people were saying about relative market caps is true. I just want people to understand the risks involved.



1119. Post 6078015 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Rooskies are buying their asses off on BTCe

EDIT: Now the Chinese are piling on too. Keep going, you wonderful Asian Suckers. Daddy needs a new pair of shoes.



1120. Post 6078369 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: MinermanNC on April 05, 2014, 02:21:02 AM
Gentlemen...

Do we have takeoff?

edit: Oh my god... I think it actually is happening

Cautiously optimistic here  Shocked


EDIT: but aren't they still asleep in china? lol

Chinese rockets are notoriously prone to crash into the ocean.



1121. Post 6078389 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 05, 2014, 02:57:47 AM
such volume.... out of no where. and this is just the beginning.
It started on BTC-e.  Those Russian oligarchs trying to find a way to evade sanctions?



1122. Post 6082055 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: rohnearner on April 05, 2014, 11:34:34 AM
C'mon I have seen 450 enough times today move upto 500$ you lazy coin..!


Yeah, so I can dump the rest of my trading stash. If there's a clear trend reversal, I'll buy back at a loss and be happy to do so. Unfortunately I think that's extraordinarily unlikely until the $400 wall is tested or until all the gamblers get bored and move on. Very likely we'll move sideways for a while. Time to do other stuff.



1123. Post 6082133 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on April 05, 2014, 11:42:15 AM
posting this for the sake of argument

2013 bottom


now


Compelling argument, but if you want to argue, let's argue. If I recall correctly, Gox had halted fiat withdrawals and the rally didn't resume until the withdrawals resumed, right? Now Gox is dead and China is dying. What are the Odds that the PBoC will reverse it's pollicy? There's not even a rumor of that happening.



1124. Post 6082235 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: igorr on April 05, 2014, 12:28:06 PM
Game is over,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=554626.0

That's all from April 2.  Do something useful and quit giving us history lessons.



1125. Post 6085085 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: jonoiv on April 05, 2014, 04:20:53 PM
http://bitbet.us/bet/759/gold-will-close-above-usd-2000-in-2014/

isnt this a easy 'no' bet?

its about 1.3k now right?

and what if Russia invades Ukraine?

NATO members will make several very stern speeches, and sanctions will get a little bit stronger. What happened when Russia invaded Georgia? Not much.



1126. Post 6085126 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: igorr on April 05, 2014, 04:25:40 PM
Last 3 days, bull tried four times, but apparently impossible to break 455-460 usd !

I keep putting out a tiny 1 BTC limit ask and I drive the price down $3 each time. I feel like a market manipulator! except nobody buys my bitcoin and I haven't made any money :-(



1127. Post 6085872 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: byronbb on April 05, 2014, 04:51:11 PM
Big operator is obviously playing both sides of bitfinex orderbook.



Unbelievable! I lower my ask by $2 and price drops $1.50 immediately. You can't give BTC away today. Can't market order sell because the spread's lower than the fee. I literally can't make $2 today.



1128. Post 6085922 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: MikeH on April 05, 2014, 05:20:54 PM
and what if Russia invades Ukraine?

lol, they have no aggressive intention, never did - they just reacted to the NATO coup.

the propaganda has been ridiculous, check out www.paulcraigroberts.org for an unbiased view (despite being a westerner).


Don't give us that shit. Putin is a thug. I think the West should stay out of it because it's not our business and I think many Ukranians are aspiring thugs themselves. But let's not kid ourselves. Russia has an extremely long history of autocratic rule. "Slav" literally means "slave". At least he's been a competent thug so far.



1129. Post 6086305 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: MikeH on April 05, 2014, 05:39:27 PM
Don't give us that shit. Putin is a thug. I think the West should stay out of it because it's not our business and I think many Ukranians are aspiring thugs themselves. But let's not kid ourselves. Russia has an extremely long history of autocratic rule. "Slav" literally means "slave". At least he's been a competent thug so far.

what do you mean the west should stay out of it? it would have never occurred if they hadn't organised it - Soros, McCain, Nuland etc.  do some research, the MSM has been flat out lying.

Certain groups in the West (neocons) played a a part no doubt, but that doesn't mean that Western powers as a whole were behind it. There was and is a real desire for freedom and less corruption by many Ukranian People. I think they are being naive. If I was Ukranian, I'd GTFO of that shithole, even if it was my home. I'd take as many of my family members as I could with me. Whoever ends up in charge there isn't likely to be much better than the guy they threw out.

McCain is doing his best to retroactively deserve the torture he received in Viet Nam. Neocons think that they can fix stuff when all they do is get people killed and waste money.

Obama isn't competent enough to engineer a revolution. That's his best virtue. The west has a foreign policy establishment that's just smart enough to be dangerous. They rid the world of Saddam Hussein and left the Ayatollah as the regional power in the Middle East.



1130. Post 6086557 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on April 05, 2014, 05:47:39 PM
Short-term looks bullish to me.
bid

It's not bullish or bearish. It's consolidation. You're seeing the oscillations get smaller and smaller as the amplitude of the swings decrease as the bots skim the market maker spread. It's gonna flatline before or unless some new development upsets the equilibrium. 



1131. Post 6086874 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 05, 2014, 06:26:42 PM
Short-term looks bullish to me.
bid

It's not bullish or bearish. It's consolidation. You're seeing the oscillations get smaller and smaller as the amplitude of the swings decrease as the bots skim the market maker spread. It's gonna flatline before or unless some new development upsets the equilibrium.  

Denial.  Its a bull penant. Igorr showed us.

Putin has a powerful propaganda machine.  People who think they are too clever for msm lies are suckers for it.

If it is a bull pennant, the breakout will trip my sell orders. I can jump back on board the train if it's coming without too big of a loss. However if it's just another bull trap like we've had for the last four months, I have my downside somewhat protected.

As I said, Putin is a competent thug. We seem to agree on that. There are no good guys in war. Even George fucking Washington suppressed the Whiskey Rebellion before the ink was dry on the peace treaty with England and before the Constitution was written. FDR was a dictator who "saved" Europe only to give half of it to Stalin.

If Putin was even smarter, he's be buying the shit out of bitcoin to build immunity from sanctions. He's smart, but not that smart, IMHO.



1132. Post 6087158 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Ivanhoe on April 05, 2014, 06:58:27 PM
No, i am 27, why?
Because you probably didn't see the big picture of bitcoin and the financial world. You were probably just in it for a quick buck and bought into the hype. Too bad you did get burnt, but i tell you this is a time to buy not to sell.

Good, then buy my bitcoin at $556- $3 cheaper than yesterday. I'll buy it back at $447, I promise. A week ago these were premium $500 bitcoins. What the hell happened? If they are such a good deal, then why don't you buy? oh, that's right. You're broke. You're just a bunch of dumb-asses like me.

I never realized how annoying I was as a bull until I wasn't one anymore. Sorry, Fellas. I'll try to make up for it by being an even more annoying bear.



1133. Post 6087226 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on April 05, 2014, 07:03:52 PM
Short-term looks bullish to me.
bid

It's not bullish or bearish. It's consolidation. You're seeing the oscillations get smaller and smaller as the amplitude of the swings decrease as the bots skim the market maker spread. It's gonna flatline before or unless some new development upsets the equilibrium. 
I am just expressing my opinion.  I am interest in the opinion of others too, but please do not put on a lecturing tone.  Nobody has a crystal ball.

My fucking tone? Are you serious? I wasn't being disrespectful, but now I am. Kiss my ass.



1134. Post 6087470 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 05, 2014, 07:17:41 PM
Ivanhoe, are u implying it's impossible for a youngster(15-20) to realize the value in bitcoin?

Or just that it is more unlikely then a 35 year old?
Not impossible, but just more unlikely  Wink

I think youngsters probably are less likely to want bitcoin for "store of value" or "safe from confiscation" etc. , but are more likely to start using it as a currency once there are enough places to use it (for example poker sites etc.).

They also may like the technological aspects, the potential control without a bank and the hip factor of the latest and greatest

They should want it for a bunch of reasons, but they don't- at least not yet. Stupid kids. Clearly there's a problem with them and not us, right?

The only thing that makes me feel dumber than selling a bitcoin at $456 is trying to sell one and being unable to. I want some money!  This isn't some intimidating sell wall, it's one goddamn coin. Do you guys realize how pathetic we must look from the outside?



1135. Post 6087594 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

YES!!! someone finally bought it on bitfinex. Now quick, somebody dump so I can buy in back @ $447.



1136. Post 6087840 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: ChrisML on April 05, 2014, 07:48:22 PM
YES!!! someone finally bought it on bitfinex. Now quick, somebody dump so I can buy in back @ $447.

What about hodling like a BTC pro. And let the dumping behind us.

You had your chance a few times the last weeks.

Yeah, I held like a pro and saw my net worth plummet by two thirds. Whores are pros. They get fucked. So did I. If this little rally continues, you'll see a lot more of my coins in else's pockets and If I don't get the chance to buy them back cheaper, I'm tempted to walk away and spend the cash on coke and "pros".



1137. Post 6088086 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 05, 2014, 08:05:40 PM
Have we witnessed billyjoeallen go full retard?? (based on his last post)

i have confidence in bja's member size complex.  i think this is only about ⅜ of his full spark adjustment range.

It's a net worth reduction of hundreds of thousands of dollars complex.



1138. Post 6088353 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

ok I got another sell order @ $457. C'mon, you suckers BUY BUY



1139. Post 6088517 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: windjc on April 05, 2014, 08:49:34 PM
ok I got another sell order @ $457. C'mon, you suckers BUY BUY

Its not beyond a possibility that we will have a mini rally starting tomorrow and/or Monday. Market seems to want to try to break up for a step.

Having said that, it will take some volume, which seems most likely on Sundays and Mondays. However, the bulls have been unwilling to break through any trend lines the last couple of weeks, so if they don't step up, your short at $457 will probably be a good one.

The fact we are edging up over the weekend is a bullish sign to me. But, again, there has to be follow through.

Plus I would be shocked if there wasn't more confirming news out of China this week. Which seems to be all the market is looking for to test lows again.

Who's gonna buy on Sunday @ $460 what they couldn't have bought on Friday @ $447? Is there some way to transfer fiat to exchanges on weekends that I don't know about?
I hope you're right.



1140. Post 6088545 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 05, 2014, 08:52:17 PM
Based on the above, what happens if all the chinese exclanges close, and they have to recourse to face to face trades? Volume goes down, but it does not mean anything for the price, except the trades will have to be performed on a wider price range, decided by the traders' negotiation ability.

Imagine a buyer saying: I have wanted some coins for some time, I have had difficulty finding them, I have lots of fiat and I die to get some. Price will be quite high.

Imagine a seller saying: I bought too many, my creditors are after me and I have four hungry kids at home. I have to get rid of some coins. The price will be quite low.



Liquidity commands a premium. That premium was destroyed in China.  When the premium went away btc reverted to its  fundamental value -- well, it overshot slightly to the down side.  The question now is when will the overshoot end.

IS BEING DESTROYED in China. Present tense.



1141. Post 6088602 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

another satisfied sucker customer. I got 2 BTC at $559 up for grabs. Anyone? anyone?



1142. Post 6088648 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 05, 2014, 09:09:04 PM
another satisfied sucker customer. I got 2 BTC at $559 up for grabs. Anyone? anyone?

do you accept colorful canadian money?

B.C. Bud only.



1143. Post 6089109 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 05, 2014, 09:46:04 PM
YES!!! someone finally bought it on bitfinex. Now quick, somebody dump so I can buy in back @ $447.

What about hodling like a BTC pro. And let the dumping behind us.

You had your chance a few times the last weeks.

Yeah, I held like a pro and saw my net worth plummet by two thirds. Whores are pros. They get fucked. So did I. If this little rally continues, you'll see a lot more of my coins in else's pockets and If I don't get the chance to buy them back cheaper, I'm tempted to walk away and spend the cash on coke and "pros".


Ok.  I don't know what people do exactly or how they trade.. however, let's take some of the information that you already provided to us and then speculate a little. 

Let's say for example that you bet wrong b/c you were betting that BTC prices would go to sub $400.  Accordingly, you sold 100 BTC at $430. 

From info you provided, we already know that your average BTC buy in price is less than $40.  Therefore, your total buy in price for 100 BTC is $4,000, but your sell price is $43,000.  You bet wrong, and the train leaves the station, and at some point you say, "shit, i better get on this train or I am going to be left when they get to the rocket liftoff."  Therefore, you buy back in at $500 rather than $400.  You are only able to buy 86 BTC with your $43,000 rather than 107.5 BTC at $400.  You are still ahead by $39,000 with your initial investment, even though you could have been ahead by more. 

In this hypothetical, you lost $4000, but the difference in what you could have gained is 21.5 BTC.  Yet, that is part of the risk in taking chances.  NO?


I know that I am speculating on the numbers, and maybe you bet 500BTC but the same theory applies - just multiply by 5.  There is still a fairly decent chance that prices could reach $429 again before the weekend is up... ... maybe 40% chance?

That's pretty close, yes. $429 his weekend is more like a 15% chance, but over the next two weeks it's more like a 55% chance.



1144. Post 6089221 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: seleme on April 05, 2014, 09:55:10 PM
billyjoe losing his fucking mind lol

Pathetic little moaner. Moaned at 650$ because it's cheap, moans at 450 because it's expensive. He just enjoys making himself to look like idiot  Grin

I am an idiot. The difference between you and me is that I know it.



1145. Post 6089373 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Three green candle days on rapidly decreasing volume. This is pretty much the definition of a dead cat bounce. I want it to bounce just a little bit higher first.



1146. Post 6089758 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 05, 2014, 11:05:49 PM
Have we witnessed billyjoeallen go full retard?? (based on his last post)

Because he doesnt follow lock-step what the Hodl herd wants, and has the discipline to change views (even if short-term) after trial and error ? Im glad i dont follow your pack, or any pack for that matter, it's a liberating feeling  Cool

There's NO mandate that you have to HODL... I resemble that statement, so much.... !!!  You can also BUY, BUY, BUY.  Either of them are good.

Yeh, yeh we've heard it a zillion times...buy, buy, buy....cheap, cheap, cheap...any coin is a cheap coin...it could be at 10K and bultards would be saying it's cheap. Fortunately, i was canny enough to block out the snake oil pitches, and get out at 600-950 after buying in at 125.


I consider anything below $1000 to be pretty good value.. but of course it is all relative.  Who would buy a BTC at $1000, if they are on sale for $458-ish.. while supplies last?


Also, if you are out of BTC and you are NOT convinced, then why you hanging out here?  You want to save some of us from ourselves, or do you have some kind of vested interest to hang around  these parts?

actually just sold 2 at $459.27!



1147. Post 6090161 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 05, 2014, 11:42:13 PM
nobody panic, billy's gana max leverage and post us a nice 25BTC wall real soon, cheap coins for all!

I got 3 for sale at the low low price of $465.99 !!!



1148. Post 6090373 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: TERA on April 05, 2014, 11:53:50 PM


exactly.



1149. Post 6090661 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Le Happy Merchant on April 06, 2014, 12:28:52 AM
the next dump could be brutal

For the dumper yes. Who would dump at these prices?

I just market sold 3 BTC @ $465.  If this shit continues, I'll double that and then double it again. Then I'll leverage short.



1150. Post 6090708 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 06, 2014, 12:44:19 AM

I just market sold 3 BTC @ $465.  If this shit continues, I'll double that and then double it again. Then I'll leverage short.

I thought you learned your lesson with leverage.

Imagine the possibility that you take another hit while watching your would be investment take a hike.

maybe you need to take a break, you sound angry.

Good point. Maybe I'll double it four times before margin shorting.



1151. Post 6090790 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: byronbb on April 06, 2014, 12:50:33 AM
the next dump could be brutal

For the dumper yes. Who would dump at these prices?

I just market sold 3 BTC @ $465.  If this shit continues, I'll double that and then double it again. Then I'll leverage short.

This doesn't make any sense. One should make decisions based on the current market, not "I am going to chase losses with leverage if I am wrong".

I made $400 today locked in. That's not "if the market holds". That's USD. and if the market keeps going up, I'll lock in more. I hope it does. I will have tens of thousands of dollars to jump back on the gravy train if a clear reversal materializes.

Edit: make that $1400.



1152. Post 6090823 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

The real question is who's gonna buy today when they could have bought yesterday @ $477 or when I bought at $10.  Who's gonna hold when they can lock in a $18 profit in a down market?

Sell this bounce and help me defend the $400 wall or run the risk of this bounce being like the last 20 or so.



1153. Post 6090858 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: shmadz on April 06, 2014, 01:02:04 AM
the next dump could be brutal

For the dumper yes. Who would dump at these prices?

I just market sold 3 BTC @ $465.  If this shit continues, I'll double that and then double it again. Then I'll leverage short.

This doesn't make any sense. One should make decisions based on the current market, not "I am going to chase losses with leverage if I am wrong".

I made $400 today locked in. That's not "if the market holds". That's USD. and if the market keeps going up, I'll lock in more. I hope it does. I will have tens of thousands of dollars to jump back on the gravy train if a clear reversal materializes.

What exactly would be sufficient evidence or indication of a clear reversal?

If price goes up with increasing rather than decreasing volume, followed by increasing support in the order book. And the 1 day MACD confirms this.



1154. Post 6091053 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 06, 2014, 01:20:50 AM
The real question is who's gonna buy today when they could have bought yesterday @ $477 or when I bought at $10.  Who's gonna hold when they can lock in a $18 profit in a down market?

Sell this bounce and help me defend the $400 wall or run the risk of this bounce being like the last 20 or so.

Everybody who sold at 900, 800, 700, 600 and 500 will buy now if they don't want the price to run away from them. Also if they sold at 300 or 400. They have cash to burn because they have a very helpful attribute: patience - and perhaps foresight planning and self control.

As mr buffet observed the market is an efficient machine for transferring wealth from the impatient to the patient.

I agree with WB.  I bought @ $10 in 2011 and was very patient. Anyone buying higher will transfer their wealth to me. If I run out of coins in my trading account, I'll Xfer some from cold storage and do it again. We have to shake out the wankers or the real uptrend won't come. Those wankers will be shaken out, even if I turn out to be one of them, even if you are. Honey Badger don't care.



1155. Post 6091187 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: BitChick on April 06, 2014, 01:14:22 AM
The real question is who's gonna buy today when they could have bought yesterday @ $477 or when I bought at $10.  Who's gonna hold when they can lock in a $18 profit in a down market?

Sell this bounce and help me defend the $400 wall or run the risk of this bounce being like the last 20 or so.

Who is going to buy now? Many people are much more likely to buy as the price is rising.  They feel more confident when they see the direction Bitcoin is moving and are willing to purchase at a higher price because of that.  When the price hits "rock bottom" it can be very difficult to buy because the feeling is a bit depressing and there is more fear and worry.  But with rallies come more confidence and a more positive outlook and then the money just starts flowing in.  

Then I'll take their money because it's likely not going straight up from here. No Wall Street whale is going to dump tens of millions into a Hong Kong or Slovenian exchange. If they're buying now, they're buying from miners who haven't paid bills in four months. I myself am getting pretty damn sick of living on credit cards. I have good credit but it's not infinite. I don't think a bounce to $540 after a plunge from $1100 is going to instill much confidence in the face of Gox, China, Shrem, etc.

Look at what happened to the $710 whale. We all thought we were out of the woods. I did too. Those who don't learn from mistakes are doomed to repeat them.

Please don't shoot the messenger. I wish I had a better outlook. I'm sorry if this analysis is discomforting. OTOH, if you find it amusing, then by all means BUY BUY BUY! I like to get well paid for entertaining people.



1156. Post 6091378 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Erdogan on April 06, 2014, 01:46:33 AM
the next dump could be brutal

For the dumper yes. Who would dump at these prices?

I just market sold 3 BTC @ $465.  If this shit continues, I'll double that and then double it again. Then I'll leverage short.

You risk losing all your gains. With leverage, you risk going underwater. Your whole bitcoin experience could be a drain on your wealth. It could turn to a liability. To a total fiasco.

Why this risky behaviour?


I have the ability to double 4X before margin shorting. Margin shorting is extremely risky and I'll only do it if the rally continues in a parabolic way. A slow steady rise on building volume will make me rethink market conditions.



1157. Post 6091542 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Huobi's going nuts. If bitfinex follows, I'm going to make bank.



1158. Post 6091652 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Erdogan on April 06, 2014, 02:57:21 AM
the next dump could be brutal

For the dumper yes. Who would dump at these prices?

I just market sold 3 BTC @ $465.  If this shit continues, I'll double that and then double it again. Then I'll leverage short.

You risk losing all your gains. With leverage, you risk going underwater. Your whole bitcoin experience could be a drain on your wealth. It could turn to a liability. To a total fiasco.

Why this risky behaviour?



Yeah, but if he is saying that he bought in at $10 per BTC.. and in another post he said that his average is below $40  er BTC... He should have a whole hell of a lot of room for playing around and taking risks....   if that is 1,000 or more BTC, which I kind of doubt it to be that much.... but who knows?  working with incomplete information, here... and that is why it is difficult to judge another persons investment strategy without knowing some particulars.

And we all gotta admit that BTC is very much up and down... even though sometimes it seems fucked like we are on our way in one direction, we get the returns back down to some extent.. and if we get a sudden shoot up.. and then who the hell wants to wait 2 months or even 6 months for a flash crash to recover from that?


He could, obviously, conceptually divide his bitcoin stash into two parts, holding one part and speculating with the other part. That would ease his risk a bit. Regardless, shorting the risk part with leverage, it could eat into his hold part, and even erase it, he could still go underwater, both parts taken as a whole.

Edit: He also says he has used credit to buy coins, that means he is leveraged also on his longs, which could take hime out also on the long part if he is unlucky. So that pretty much nullifies my argument, I guess.

In the end, it depends on the price going up. Which I happen to think is a safe bet, but I understand everybody does not agree on that.

The VAST majority of my coins are in cold storage. I am betting my trading stash that the market is going down, but if I am wrong, I win more than I lose.



1159. Post 6091722 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Erdogan on April 06, 2014, 03:13:45 AM
the next dump could be brutal

For the dumper yes. Who would dump at these prices?

I just market sold 3 BTC @ $465.  If this shit continues, I'll double that and then double it again. Then I'll leverage short.

You risk losing all your gains. With leverage, you risk going underwater. Your whole bitcoin experience could be a drain on your wealth. It could turn to a liability. To a total fiasco.

Why this risky behaviour?



Yeah, but if he is saying that he bought in at $10 per BTC.. and in another post he said that his average is below $40  er BTC... He should have a whole hell of a lot of room for playing around and taking risks....   if that is 1,000 or more BTC, which I kind of doubt it to be that much.... but who knows?  working with incomplete information, here... and that is why it is difficult to judge another persons investment strategy without knowing some particulars.

And we all gotta admit that BTC is very much up and down... even though sometimes it seems fucked like we are on our way in one direction, we get the returns back down to some extent.. and if we get a sudden shoot up.. and then who the hell wants to wait 2 months or even 6 months for a flash crash to recover from that?


He could, obviously, conceptually divide his bitcoin stash into two parts, holding one part and speculating with the other part. That would ease his risk a bit. Regardless, shorting the risk part with leverage, it could eat into his hold part, and even erase it, he could still go underwater, both parts taken as a whole.

Edit: He also says he has used credit to buy coins, that means he is leveraged also on his longs, which could take hime out also on the long part if he is unlucky. So that pretty much nullifies my argument, I guess.

In the end, it depends on the price going up. Which I happen to think is a safe bet, but I understand everybody does not agree on that.

The VAST majority of my coins are in cold storage. I am betting my trading stash that the market is going down, but if I am wrong, I win more than I lose.

Fair enough, but that means your shorts work against your cold storage. Why leverage both? Why not just do one of the things, and rightsize your holdings? Give the kids some food and have ease of mind.


Because I want to learn how to day trade. If I am successful, I will help soak up excess liquidity when the market doesn't need it and I will provide liquidity when the market needs it and in so doing, help stabilize the price which is good for merchants and the general bitcoin using public. If I am an unsuccessful trader, I will be giving money to the people who stabilize bitcoin.  One has to appreciate the genius of Satoshi for getting the incentives right.



1160. Post 6093178 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: greenlion on April 06, 2014, 06:48:28 AM
You have to keep doubling and betting until you win.  It is mathematically proven at least to be a break even strategy as long as the odds are exactly 50/50 like flipping a coin or black and red on a roulette wheel... so long as there are NO betting limitations.  Your point is that a guy would run out of money sooner or later, but overall it is at least a break even strategy... and pretty unlikely that a guy or gal would lose more than 10 times in a row.

ALL bet distributions/"strategies" are mathematically "proven" to be break even under these conditions, because of the very nature of how multiplication and addition work in the first place.

The Small Martingale is a suicidal way to almost guarantee you will lose all your money. Let's say you start out with a $2 bet and a binary outcome. Eventually you are betting $128, $256 or $512 just to win $2!!  all the rest of the bet is doing is making up your losses. You win $2 at a time but lose your entire stack when you run out of money or reach the table limits.

This is not what I am doing. I am locking in profits. If market fundamentals or technicals change, I can jump back in.



1161. Post 6094819 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Gentlemen, let me spell it out for you: If you market buy into this fool's rally, I will take your money. I didn't put my life savings into the riskiest investment in the world three years ago to have a bunch of johnny-come-latelys hop on the gravy train at the last minute and ride for free. Put in lower bids, help me defend the $400 wall and earn the right to be bitcoiners. You'll save money, and I won't have to dump the coins I bought for $10 on your heads.




1162. Post 6096152 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: igorr on April 06, 2014, 01:26:02 PM
does anybody still care about walls? down to $400, it just crossed the 15k mark!

It is fake wall.
Just compare with huobi wall, and
you can see.
There no have any logic.
Huobi has a volume of daily transactions three times more than bitstamp and should have a greater wall than bitstamp.

Shouldn't it be a Great Wall?



1163. Post 6096401 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Four days volume descending like a staircase.  You'd think there would be a battle over these coins running a $15 discount over last night,>60% discount from the ATH. The only demand I see is people like me waiting to buy back the same coins we dumped 12 hours ago.



1164. Post 6100062 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Volume is nonexistent.



1165. Post 6100927 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Everyone is expecting a big move up or down. I think it's just as likely that we'll go largely sideways for a painful amount of time. That would be the worst possible scenario for me personally so of course i think it'll prolly happen.



1166. Post 6103406 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 06, 2014, 11:40:46 PM
LOL that video is hilarious. they have no idea at all. If they wanted to say something that was actually negative, they could talk about the third party deposits ban. but that is not the end of bitcoin at all. I love watching shit like that at the bottom.

I´m sorry but these are confirmed LEGIT TA ANALYSTS FROM WALL STREET!

I think somebody here needs to tell that guy that his stupid lines on his chart dont mean shit. he's just drawing them to fit LOL.

but seriously, do you believe this? the fundamental reason they offer for bitcoin crashing is capital gains, when bitcoin will not be used by the crowd, only on behalf of the crowd. they are blaming the crash on mtgox, but mt gox is just FUD! it's happened! over!

It's hilarious! "Bitcoin's going to negative $100!!" That would be awesome. People would pay me money to take bitcoins off their hands. WE gotta save that one so two years from now we can shove it in his face along with professor Bitcorn and the dozens of other idiot pontificators. We get these stories every single correction.



1167. Post 6103937 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

What does "manipulation" even mean to you? You think you have some God given right to buy low and sell high? It is likely big players are buying and selling back to themselves hoping to ignite a rally or spark a panic that they can take advantage of, but you can just as easily skim off of them by betting against the signal. Or bet with it and ride the trend if you want. That's not manipulation. That's how free marker price discovery works. Shaking out the weak hands.

Nobody is front running your buy or sell order. Nobody is shorting coins that don't exist. Even if you suspected as much, all you would have to do is go to another exchange.  By bitching about manipulation, all you are telling me is that you can't hack this game and should go away. If you think you have an edge in some way, bet on it and I won't call you a manipulator. If you don't think you have an edge, find one or just go away. The free market's a jungle and you sound like you'd be happier in a zoo.



1168. Post 6104286 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: byron[i][i]bb on April 07, 2014, 02:25:33 AM
^^ exactly.

If you can see clearly the manipulation, what's the problem? nobody has any special advantages in a zero sum game.

Well before the SEC there were lots of things big traders were doing that eventually became illegal, but maybe your point still stands.

The SEC is worthless. They can be bought. Who regulates the regulators? The solutions are both technological and good ol' fashioned caveat emptor.  Reggie Middleton designed a way to trade stocks on the blockchain. I think the idea holds great promise.

I just don't get the gripes. If you think JP Morgan is artificially suppressing gold prices, then good! Buy gold at a discount. Just don't buy at a discount and then gripe that you may also have to sell at a discount. You can't have it both ways.

You think bitcoin price is artificially high? Then quit bitching and sell. or don't buy any. If you think it's artificially low then buy more. People are buying and selling based on information you don't have. They always have and always will. But maybe you have information they don't have. Nobody knows everything.

And the griping that rich people have disproportionate influence over your future is infantile. I'd rather have rich people with disproportionate influence than poor people. They are much worse.



1169. Post 6104420 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: octaft on April 07, 2014, 02:54:17 AM
And the griping that rich people have disproportionate influence over your future is infantile. I'd rather have rich people with disproportionate influence than poor people. They are much worse.

If Ayn Rand had a dick, how far down your throat do you think it would be? 3 inches? 4? The whole goddamn 8?

I dunno. How far up your ass do you keep your copy of Das Kapital?



1170. Post 6104460 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

look at those Bitfinex ask walls. Wer'e in for some discount coins! Hope everyone's got their fiat handy.



1171. Post 6108894 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

I love this hypothetical speculation about God Being a day trader. How much would He be trading and to what goal? Maximizing His dollar return on investment?  If so, the goal would be to trade to accumulate Bitcoin by selling  high and then buying back more Bitcoin, a larger dollar amount at the lows. This would over time have a larger and larger effect on the price making the lows higher and the highs lower until the upward trendline is near perfectly smooth. When trendline became perfectly smooth, God could make no more profits from trading volatility and would simply sell 1% for every 1% increase in price for a perpetual river of income. 

Every trader's actions, no matter how small, affect the market. Successful traders reduce volatility and unsuccessful traders increase volatility up the the point they leave the market. This is why bitcoin needs no central bank. It has us. Dumb traders pay smart traders and smart traders reduce volatility.




1172. Post 6109354 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: KFR on April 07, 2014, 12:33:38 PM
I love this hypothetical speculation about God Being a day trader. How much would He be trading and to what goal? Maximizing His dollar return on investment?  If so, the goal would be to trade to accumulate Bitcoin by selling  high and then buying back more Bitcoin, a larger dollar amount at the lows. This would over time have a larger and larger effect on the price making the lows higher and the highs lower until the upward trendline is near perfectly smooth. When trendline became perfectly smooth, God could make no more profits from trading volatility and would simply sell 1% for every 1% increase in price for a perpetual river of income. 

Every trader's actions, no matter how small, affect the market. Successful traders reduce volatility and unsuccessful traders increase volatility up the the point they leave the market. This is why bitcoin needs no central bank. It has us. Dumb traders pay smart traders and smart traders reduce volatility.



God doesn't play dice.  God HODLs.

What your saying is that GOD wouldn't be a day trader, which is against the very premise of the hypothetical, you stupid fuck.



1173. Post 6109609 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

There were rumors of Gox closing for months. There was denial all the way up until the day deposits were halted. China exchanges closing is playing out the same way. Those exchanges will closed unless the PBoC reverses policy, which would be extremely unlikely. Much of the consequence has been priced in, but not all of it. Not yet. The two largest Chinese exchanges, Huobi and BTC China, are still operating. When one of these goes down, $400 support will be tested. If they both go down simultaneously, that support will likely be broken.

People have been saying we're out of the woods for months. I was one of them. Step back and have a little self-awareness. Without resolution, there can be no change in trend.



1174. Post 6110099 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: Voktar on April 07, 2014, 01:12:23 PM
255 day cycle?
*snip*
edit: it take about 6 months to deflate from last bubble then 2 months for stabilisation and 1 month to initiate bullrun = about 9months cycles. the key is being patient. yeayyy Cheesy
Discussion here
http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/1z3m1z/a_look_at_four_bubbles_pricelog_linear_fit/

They are talking about a peak of $6000.

That would mean the market cap would need to move from 5.5 billion to + 75 Billion.   Who is going to fund this ?  Because I'm not and I doubt the whole bitcoin community "all in" could fund 75 billion.  

So where does the new investment come from ?

13 times it's current price, needs 13 times as much money.  Who is going to fund your dream before you dump your nice 13 x profit?

EDIT:  im not talking at you specifically, but at the people in this link you sent.


That is thanks to scarcity...

Today there are only 19900 Bitcoins for sale at Bitstamp, Gox and their Bitcoins are gone, and we have a LOT of Hodlers.

Thanks to holders (believers) there is a great scarcity, i think the next bullrun can be epic, you don't need lots of billions for a great market cap. you only need a very low supply, and holders Wink

Any and every one of us hodlers can increase our holdings without risking another dollar by selling relatively high and buying back lower. The higher the price gets, the more incentive to defect from the cartel. I'm a Bitcoin true believer, but part of my responsibility to the community is to take money from idiots.



1175. Post 6110360 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: p0peji on April 07, 2014, 01:45:24 PM
So some people where screaming the last $266 bubble that Bitcoin had no infrastructure to maintain this price, and now, that this year infrastructure is increasing and there are few Bitcoins than ever for sale some people are screaming too... because?

This year has been a fantastic year for Bitcoin (not for this price thougt), but infrastructure is more strong than ever and increasing, this is intrinsic value too, VC and Angel Investors than believe clearly see a great potential, USA has regulated BTC the same as gold, so... are we going to $0? a multiyear bear market? Seriously?  Grin Grin Grin

I'm bullish! And Hodling!





I agree that the bitcoin infrastructure is way more mature than it was a year ago. Thing is though that most companies accepting bitcoin do so by using Bitpay, this way the bitcoins spend for certain services/goods will have to be sold again on the market making the net increase in the demand for bitcoin as a result of more companies accepting bitcoin near zero.

LOL I agree that the infrastructure can now support a $266 price level. So when it gets close to that, I'll buy some more. Those guys screaming the $266 level could not be maintained were right for six months.



1176. Post 6110398 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: KFR on April 07, 2014, 01:12:55 PM
I love this hypothetical speculation about God Being a day trader. How much would He be trading and to what goal? Maximizing His dollar return on investment?  If so, the goal would be to trade to accumulate Bitcoin by selling  high and then buying back more Bitcoin, a larger dollar amount at the lows. This would over time have a larger and larger effect on the price making the lows higher and the highs lower until the upward trendline is near perfectly smooth. When trendline became perfectly smooth, God could make no more profits from trading volatility and would simply sell 1% for every 1% increase in price for a perpetual river of income. 

Every trader's actions, no matter how small, affect the market. Successful traders reduce volatility and unsuccessful traders increase volatility up the the point they leave the market. This is why bitcoin needs no central bank. It has us. Dumb traders pay smart traders and smart traders reduce volatility.



God doesn't play dice.  God HODLs.

What your saying is that GOD wouldn't be a day trader, which is against the very premise of the hypothetical, you stupid fuck.

Dude I think you might need to take a break.  Not everything posted here is deadly serious.  

Dude, kiss my ass. I said this was a fun game and I wanted to play. You basically said you don't want to play. You didn't have to do that. You could just not play. You're being a dick.



1177. Post 6110896 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Ok, price is roughly stable at $455. What this means is that there is only ~ 65% as much new money coming into bitcoin as there was when price was 53% higher. How is that not extremely bearish? People should be jumping on these cheap coins if in fact they are cheap. This is just another pit stop on the way down, which I HOPE is ~$400 and could easily be lower.

The main arguments on this thread are between those of us who want it to go lower to buy more and those of us who are expecting another choo choo. This can't be capitulation. Where are the guys wanting to cash out for good? Until they all leave, we can't have a recovery. I've been through many points of maximum pain and this is not it. Not even close.



1178. Post 6111157 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

This may just be a pause as guys like me who dumped this morning @ $458 are buying them back. It could go lower.



1179. Post 6111189 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: p0peji on April 07, 2014, 02:48:19 PM
Ok, price is roughly stable at $455. What this means is that there is only ~ 65% as much new money coming into bitcoin as there was when price was 53% higher. How is that not extremely bearish? People should be jumping on these cheap coins if in fact they are cheap. This is just another pit stop on the way down, which I HOPE is ~$400 and could easily be lower.

The main arguments on this thread are between those of us who want it to go lower to buy more and those of us who are expecting another choo choo. This can't be capitulation. Where are the guys wanting to cash out for good? Until they all leave, we can't have a recovery. I've been through many points of maximum pain and this is not it. Not even close.

How about those that are leveraged short, would they not want to see the price go to 0$?

Don't be ridiculous. If price went to zero, you'd never see your profits. The exchange would close and the guy that owes you money would be wiped out.



1180. Post 6111314 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

I just though of a way a whale can make relatively risk-free profit: Take out a margin short position at the same time you dump. Cover the short when the price drops and lock in your profit. Then buy the coins back. You could do it the same way going up with tons of fiat.



1181. Post 6112332 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 07, 2014, 03:15:15 PM
I just though of a way a whale can make relatively risk-free profit: Take out a margin short position at the same time you dump. Cover the short when the price drops and lock in your profit. Then buy the coins back. You could do it the same way going up with tons of fiat.

It's easy to imagine these things.  I challenge you to actually achieve them.

Dumping means you are losing value with each bitcoin sold, while covering means that you are losing value with each bitcoin bought, as the market moves against you.  You're lucky if the whole operation is a wash.

Self-dealing in an illiquid market, waiting for alien liquidity to come in, then seizing it, it probably the most straightforward manipulation which can work reliably.  The manipulation is accomplished with relatively few coins.  The profit is gained in a single high volume swoop.  Then you relinquish control of the market, let it stabilize, and try again.


There are low volume days when most of the other whales are asleep or away when you could do it will very little risk. I'm not a whale, but even I chopped the head off that sucker's rally three days ago with out even using using much of my trading stash, let alone cold storage. I just wished I had trusted myself more and dumped everything.

The $710 whale was alien liquidity too, just on the fiat side. Who on this thread has the ability to quickly take advantage of a major BTC dump? Who has the fiat besides me? Nobody except TERA that I know of, and we're not whales. Most of the clowns here buy BTC the same hour their fiat hit's the exchange. They have the patience of a teenage boy fucking in the back seat. Put in your bids and let the sellers come to you. They will come.



1182. Post 6112755 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Mining bitcoins is real work. If you think it's easy, you should try it. It's just as productive to society as digging some yellow metal out of one hole and putting in in another. It's MORE productive than printing pictures of dead presidents. Mining is also a break-even proposition. Half the miners in the real world and the bitcoinosphere lose money.

Central bankers do not have the same incentives to inject and withdraw liquidity that we as traders have. When we get stuff wrong, we pay immediately. Central bankers retire and give speeches. Helicopter Ben Bernanke put a Band-aid tmon a melanoma and he's called a doctor. They are still calling Alan Greenspan, Destroyer of Worlds, the "maestro".



1183. Post 6112824 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 07, 2014, 04:33:59 PM
Arguably, a single black market web site was sufficient to support a $100 price point.  A mature black market ($1tn/an on ~2mm btc float @ V=6) PQ/V~=$84bn, => btc = $42,000)  is definitely sufficient to support a moon shot.  Every nation on earth could outlaw bitcoin (not going to happen) and it would still make current holders an incredible return, in exchange for their willingness to endure the insane volatility.


What do you mean by "a mature black market"? 

Is a black bitcoin market possible on the internet, if one cannot convert cash to bitcoin annimously, the government can snoop your email and set up fake mixers and drug sites, and all payments are publicly displayed in the blockchain?

Anyway, Bitcoin was not meant to be used by outlaws only.  I don't think governments will will want to ban bitcoin, but if they do, it would have failed.


It's trivially easy to buy and sell bitcoin face to face. Why should we care if bitcoin fails by your definition? If is is being used, it is succeeding to us. Your knee-jerk deference to authority would make you a great concentration camp guard.



1184. Post 6113188 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Don't you guys who were expecting up up and away feel like dumb-asses yet? I wanna hear you cry and I'm not buying back until you do.



1185. Post 6113551 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

The first person to panic wins if you get to buy back in lower.



1186. Post 6113689 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: dreamspark on April 07, 2014, 05:30:49 PM
The first person to panic wins if you get to buy back in lower.

This is true, first person to panic buy wins as well cause you get more coins for your mullah!

Do you honestly think there is more greed than fear in this market right now?



1187. Post 6113790 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: Rampion on April 07, 2014, 05:44:24 PM
The first person to panic wins if you get to buy back in lower.

This is true, first person to panic buy wins as well cause you get more coins for your mullah!

Do you honestly think there is more greed than fear in this market right now?

You only have fear when you are close to the very bottom. Those who feel euphoria or fear always lose, because they buy near the top and sell near the bottom.

Just buy when this forum is bloated by FUD-spreader trolls, and sell when the thread is completely bloated by train pictures.

For the record: I'm buying myself, going in the $300 range is possible in my book, but no way we are going below $266. If we really go below $266 (VERY unlikely) I'd expect a long, multi-month bear market, but I'm betting on it NOT happening.

I'm more of an "It's always darkest before it goes pitch black" kind of guy. I have many times more coins in cold storage so I'm using my trading account as a hedge right now. Worse thing that can happen to me is that I'm stuck with tens of thousands in fiat while my main stash rockets up in value. I think I can live with that. Locking in profit on coins I bought in two digits may be a fear move, but it's the smart play. How many people with much much more BTC than me have to do the same thing for price to crater? Not Many.



1188. Post 6114184 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 07, 2014, 05:46:46 PM
It's trivially easy to buy and sell bitcoin face to face. Why should we care if bitcoin fails by your definition? If is is being used, it is succeeding to us.

If bitcoin is banned (again, an hypothetical scenario -- I don't think it will be), BitPay will close.  You will not be able to use bitcoin to pay for purchases on internet stores lke Amazon and Overstock.  You will not be able to pay for hotels, travel or entertainment,.  You will not be able to use bitcoins to buy newspaper, coffe, groceries, pay the rent.  You may be lucky to find a plumber or real estate agent that accepts bitcoin, but it will be risky (IRS etc.) Your salary will be in old money and you will not have any legal way to convert it to bitcoin.  If you pay for something in advance with bicoin, and the other side does not deliver, you cannot complain to the police.  And so on.

So, what would you use your bitcoins for? 

knee-jerk deference to authority

Although many people (myself included) are unhappy about the government they have, the vast majority actually wants a strong government with effective laws,  police and courts -- because they know what happens when those things fail.


Bad things happen when strong governments fail, and when weak governments fail, and even when strong governments don't fail, and when weak governments become strong governments. They are just different bad things. The chaos that follows a failed state is a product of that failed state. That's Why America didn't turn into Somalia when the British government failed here but Russia turned into a Kleptocracy when the Soviet Union failed.

A monopoly government cannot be a strong government because the lack of competition makes it weak. It rots from the inside out just like private monopolies do. Some monopoly governments are stronger than others, but I don't think any of them are strong enough to accomplish what you want them to accomplish. If you want effective laws, common law is generally better and more effective than legislative edicts. Best practices emerge over time and are usually not handed down by you ivory tower types.

To answer your question, if Bitcoin was outlawed, I would use it to move my capital out of the country. Capitial controls are a strong signal that the time to get out of Dodge is coming soon. Hopefully many more people from other countries will have to use it for that purpose before I do and when they do, I will provide them with liquidity.




1189. Post 6114291 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: hdbuck on April 07, 2014, 06:20:20 PM

no im saying that the unbanked masses main concern is access to food and water. people with bank accounts litterally take dumps in drinkable water. so just stop pretending that bitcoin will change those unbanked masses lives. What should change is the centralisation of the world's resources.

It is an incredibly narrow (and supremely arrogant) point of view to consider anyone who is not "taking dumps in drinkable water" to be so poor they must be starving, sub-Saharan Africa style.

There are upwards of 2 billion people that could immensely benefit from BTC going mainstream, and, no, they are neither starving nor US/Euro level rich.

i was more thinking of india slumb style since i've been there recently and felt quite ashamed. and sure about 2billion "medium poor people" could benefit from bitcoin.. but only after the first billion that we are make profit.. on their back... sadly as always. thats all im sayin.

That's not how it works. The retched poor will only adopt bitcoin if we provide services for them at a lower cost than the people currently exploiting them. We can only make billions in profits off their backs by lightening the load. It has to be voluntary unlike many of the services they currently use. The first county to mandate bitcoin use or make it legal tender will see me liquidating my stash.



1190. Post 6114497 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on April 07, 2014, 06:24:42 PM
The first person to panic wins if you get to buy back in lower.

This is true, first person to panic buy wins as well cause you get more coins for your mullah!

Do you honestly think there is more greed than fear in this market right now?

You only have fear when you are close to the very bottom. Those who feel euphoria or fear always lose, because they buy near the top and sell near the bottom.

Just buy when this forum is bloated by FUD-spreader trolls, and sell when the thread is completely bloated by train pictures.

For the record: I'm buying myself, going in the $300 range is possible in my book, but no way we are going below $266. If we really go below $266 (VERY unlikely) I'd expect a long, multi-month bear market, but I'm betting on it NOT happening.

I'm more of an "It's always darkest before it goes pitch black" kind of guy. I have many times more coins in cold storage so I'm using my trading account as a hedge right now. Worse thing that can happen to me is that I'm stuck with tens of thousands in fiat while my main stash rockets up in value. I think I can live with that. Locking in profit on coins I bought in two digits may be a fear move, but it's the smart play. How many people with much much more BTC than me have to do the same thing for price to crater? Not Many.

I would advise you to take the profits during uptrends and following a rational plan (when we will hit this price I will sell x% of my stash, etc.) - I hate stating the obvious, but I'd avoid selling during dowtrends and buying during uptrends.

Maximize distribution for proffit is good.

If I get the bottom right, I will keep the bottom from being any lower than it otherwise would be. If I don't get it right, I will be giving money to the guys who keep the bottom from being lower than what it otherwise would be, a service worth paying for.



1191. Post 6114630 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Looking at the charts again, there hasn't been a single green candle day that wasn't a lower candle from the preceding red candle day since the post-gox "recovery". Chart looks like a ball bouncing down stairs. I doubt there will be another one until the post-China recovery.



1192. Post 6115451 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 07, 2014, 07:20:07 PM
Looking at the charts again, there hasn't been a single green candle day that wasn't a lower candle from the preceding red candle day since the post-gox "recovery". Chart looks like a ball bouncing down stairs. I doubt there will be another one until the post-China recovery.

Pardon me for fact checking, but are not Mar 23d and 31st counter-examples?


I couldn't see that on botcoinwisdom, but bitcoincharts say you are correct. Thank you. 



1193. Post 6116485 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: jonoiv on April 07, 2014, 09:09:18 PM
Just made $60  off the btce death bot Cheesy

The death bot I think doesn't care about your $60. I think it is seeking price resiliency information to determine whether or not to dump thousands of BTC. The danger is you could load up at the bottom of the cycle just as the real dump starts.



1194. Post 6116524 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 07, 2014, 09:19:45 PM
Just made $60  off the btce death bot Cheesy

The death bot I think doesn't care about your $60. I think it is seeking price resiliency information to determine whether or not to dump thousands of BTC. The danger is you could load up at the bottom of the cycle just as the real dump starts.

Of course there corollary danger is also present that you could be selling at the top of the cycle just as the real pump starts. Unlikely, but possible. I'm not a permabear, just temporarily ursine.



1195. Post 6116723 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

The buy walls are building, but we still can only absorb ~ 0.1 percent of all Bitcoins in existence (12K BTC) before the plummet to $266.  Hypothetically that one guy on Bitfinex who flashed the 15K sell wall could do it by himself. He almost certainly won't, but when China goes dark, we'll find out if this is like April of last year or like June of 2011.



1196. Post 6117035 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 07, 2014, 09:57:50 PM
The buy walls are building, but we still can only absorb ~ 0.1 percent of all Bitcoins in existence (12K BTC) before the plummet to $266.  Hypothetically that one guy on Bitfinex who flashed the 15K sell wall could do it by himself. He almost certainly won't, but when China goes dark, we'll find out if this is like April of last year or like June of 2011.

Take a look at how much the opposite buy would move the market.

Fact is, there's more upside risk than downside, right now.

Doesn't mean you're not right, but it does mean it's the riskier trade.


You still don't seem to get it. It doesn't matter how high you can drive the price if you can't unload at volume when you get there. Think three dimensionally. There may be whales who want these buy walls to build just so he can unload without slippage. A guy with 100K BTC could be looking for positions like this to cash out a big chunk with no intention to buy it back. He still has plenty. What if this isn't the bottom but the base? We're still at double the price as when China entered the market.



1197. Post 6117306 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: thefunkybits on April 07, 2014, 10:19:34 PM
The buy walls are building, but we still can only absorb ~ 0.1 percent of all Bitcoins in existence (12K BTC) before the plummet to $266.  Hypothetically that one guy on Bitfinex who flashed the 15K sell wall could do it by himself. He almost certainly won't, but when China goes dark, we'll find out if this is like April of last year or like June of 2011.


Is this what you're referring to? I saw 1500 BTC walls being flashed around on Bitfinex last night....but not 15K?

pics or it didnt happen!  Wink

edit: 1K BTC got pulled and the 500 wall was eaten



It was over a week ago. I don't have pics.  So I guess he could have sold it by now a little at a time. My point is that there are are people with massive holdings who could profit by crashing the price to buy back cheaper. The easiest  way to get bitcoin is to already have a bunch and take advantage of a vulnerable market the way George Soros made a billion dollars in one day shorting the British Pound. There are sharks out there waiting for the signal from China to eat us alive. The question isn't up or down. The question is how much lower. 

If I was an evil billionaire (possibly redundant term), I would buy hundreds of thousands of bitcoin off exchange from miners and flood the market, keeping prices low for months while I bought more coins from miners at the new lower price. People keep pointing out that fiat is infinite and bitcoin isn't. Rich guys can use time as a weapon against us. They can wait us out.



1198. Post 6117550 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

In 2011 when bitcoin crashed from $32 down to $10, I though it was an excellent time to buy. Then it went down to $2 and didn't come back up for months. I held on, but I had to move back in with my parents to do so. in my 40s. You guys think something like that can't happen now and I don't think it will, but it absolutely very well could happen.

There were a lot less bitcoins mined back then, and Satoshi's stash was a bigger proportion of them. Bitcoin hasn't just gotten the attention of angel investors. It has gotten the attention of sharks as well, and I'm not even talking about hackers. Wall Street types don't want to pay retail. They want distressed sellers and they have the ability to make us exactly that.



1199. Post 6117964 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: thefunkybits on April 07, 2014, 11:41:22 PM
Is this real??
Why would he ask though?
sounds like a pump imo

If you know Jeff Berwick he is a multi-millionaire bitcoin fan. I'm assuming this isn't for him but he's looking for a contact of his. He often reaches out to facebook when he needs business related help

Yeah, I know Jeff. Most of his holdings are in BTC and he could sell a fraction of his own if that was the case. He's scared and has reason to be. Have you noticed that rptilia and Jeff claim to be in the market for millions of dollars worth of BTC, but they don't want to pay market? Because they know market is overpriced.

Any coins bought below market are likely to be dumped on the market.



1200. Post 6118018 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

BTC-e death bot is back. How anybody trusts that sketchy exchange is beyond me.



1201. Post 6118132 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Huobi's at 2750 and dropping.



1202. Post 6118198 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: BitChick on April 08, 2014, 12:06:01 AM
I just posted a news article in the press section.  We are going to be able to get Bitcoin ATM cards that work anywhere Discover card is taken!  This is really exiting news I believe, and of course, it could be Bullish.  Granted, some people will cash out their coins perhaps, but it is progress nonetheless!  Smiley

http://gigaom.com/2014/04/07/new-bitcoin-debit-card-claims-to-work-with-90-percent-of-us-atms/

Awesome! I could use something like that if I'm still solvent when this China nightmare is over.



1203. Post 6118260 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Low volume at $445 is bad news. We're going lower. A month ago I'd be selling my internal organs to get BTC this cheap and nobody's buying.



1204. Post 6118365 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on April 08, 2014, 12:31:50 AM
I just posted a news article in the press section.  We are going to be able to get Bitcoin ATM cards that work anywhere Discover card is taken!  This is really exiting news I believe, and of course, it could be Bullish.  Granted, some people will cash out their coins perhaps, but it is progress nonetheless!  Smiley

http://gigaom.com/2014/04/07/new-bitcoin-debit-card-claims-to-work-with-90-percent-of-us-atms/


That's not spending bitcoin that is selling bitcoin for current market value and it being stored on a debit card until you're ready to spend it. This doesn't mean retailers are accepting bitcoin etc. Just sounds like a withdraw method to me.

C'mon, be fair. It's a great withdrawal method.



1205. Post 6118408 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: bassclef on April 08, 2014, 12:51:03 AM
Low volume at $445 is bad news. We're going lower. A month ago I'd be selling my internal organs to get BTC this cheap and nobody's buying.

Do not fear, the god of the 6h Huobi inverse head & shoulders is with you.

I am not the one that needs saving right now. I'm 90% fiat. (in trading account).



1206. Post 6118591 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

mini short-covering rally. Maybe last chance for bulls to bail. I'd love to see $455 so I can unload the rest of my BTC.



1207. Post 6118807 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 08, 2014, 01:20:46 AM
"an old trend may not be your friend."

we're in a reversal... weather it drops lower or not is irrelevant.

How can it be a reversal without resolution on the China Issue? The Chinese have hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of BTC to dump if they panic when one of the major exchanges goes dark. They will be a minor force for fiat flow into BTC for a long time and a potentially major flow out. Trends don't reverse on their own. Something has to happen, like when Silk Road closed or when Gox finally died. At the minimum, support has to be tested with volume.



1208. Post 6118861 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: jonoiv on April 08, 2014, 01:28:05 AM
"an old trend may not be your friend."

we're in a reversal... weather it drops lower or not is irrelevant.

I'm ready to turn bull when I see it.

But so far not a sniff. 

+1. Discover debit cards are great, but that won't reverse the most populous nation on Earth losing access to buy.



1209. Post 6119829 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: jonoiv on April 08, 2014, 03:04:08 AM
China's a bit "wtf now?" Smiley

still small volume though and as soon as it tries to break this line you will see massive resistance.  




I dunno what the hell that is, but it sure ain't Head and Shoulders.



1210. Post 6119951 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: solex on April 08, 2014, 03:42:13 AM
+1. Discover debit cards are great, but that won't reverse the most populous nation on Earth losing access to buy.

They can still buy using bank deposits, just not with money via 3rd parties. Similarly okpay, dwolla and aurumxchange were all stamped on last year by regulators in the West.


I'm not so sure. The rumor is that bank deposits will be stopped also. I'm selling the bad rumor and buying the bad news. Until there is clarity one way or another, the uncertainty will weigh on the market.



1211. Post 6120101 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: shmadz on April 08, 2014, 04:00:56 AM
+1. Discover debit cards are great, but that won't reverse the most populous nation on Earth losing access to buy.

They can still buy using bank deposits, just not with money via 3rd parties. Similarly okpay, dwolla and aurumxchange were all stamped on last year by regulators in the West.


This is my understanding as well. The banks may not partake in anything bitcoin. Payment processors are banned from doing business with any bitcoin exchange.

-but- I do not see any problems with banks wiring yuan to companies operating exchanges, yet.

My suspicion is that all the Chinese gov't really wants is to be able to watch and control the flow of their money, through the banks, and they're still loading up on gold as well.

My feeling is that they really don't understand what bitcoin means just yet, they are still focused on the currency wars going on in the "real world".

Quote from: billyjoeallen
I'm not so sure. The rumor is that bank deposits will be stopped also. I'm selling the bad rumor and buying the bad news. Until there is clarity one way or another, the uncertainty will weigh on the market.

If bank deposits stop, it will drive it completely underground. I think they prefer to keep a watchful eye.

If they don't really understand Bitcoin, then they don't know that banning bank deposits will drive it underground. You can't have it both ways. We do know that they banned another payment system that uses QR codes. Small exchanges are shutting down specifically citing this regulation. My point is only that there is uncertainty and markets hate uncertainty. The PBoC had weeks now to clarify and chose not to, even though price has fallen significantly.



1212. Post 6120210 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 08, 2014, 04:16:22 AM

I dunno what the hell that is, but it sure ain't Head and Shoulders.

Gradual exhaustion of a short term reversal. I'm selling my trading margin.  Start buying again at 429.
Or i chase it uphill if I am wrong.  Hopefully by BTFDing.

Yeah I just got the last of my trading margin out @ $455, fully aware that could be the worst possible moment to go full fiat.



1213. Post 6120274 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: shmadz on April 08, 2014, 04:30:20 AM
+1. Discover debit cards are great, but that won't reverse the most populous nation on Earth losing access to buy.

They can still buy using bank deposits, just not with money via 3rd parties. Similarly okpay, dwolla and aurumxchange were all stamped on last year by regulators in the West.


This is my understanding as well. The banks may not partake in anything bitcoin. Payment processors are banned from doing business with any bitcoin exchange.

-but- I do not see any problems with banks wiring yuan to companies operating exchanges, yet.

My suspicion is that all the Chinese gov't really wants is to be able to watch and control the flow of their money, through the banks, and they're still loading up on gold as well.

My feeling is that they really don't understand what bitcoin means just yet, they are still focused on the currency wars going on in the "real world".

Quote from: billyjoeallen
I'm not so sure. The rumor is that bank deposits will be stopped also. I'm selling the bad rumor and buying the bad news. Until there is clarity one way or another, the uncertainty will weigh on the market.

If bank deposits stop, it will drive it completely underground. I think they prefer to keep a watchful eye.

If they don't really understand Bitcoin, then they don't know that banning bank deposits will drive it underground. You can't have it both ways. We do know that they banned another payment system that uses QR codes. Small exchanges are shutting down specifically citing this regulation. My point is only that there is uncertainty and markets hate uncertainty. The PBoC had weeks now to clarify and chose not to, even though price has fallen significantly.
ok, granted, they might try to completely outlaw bitcoin. I hope they do. Every attack against bitcoin will further prove its resilience.

honey badger don't care.

I agree. I'm a long term bull. I'm only shorting now to hedge my main stash and to increase my holdings.



1214. Post 6120291 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 08, 2014, 04:29:47 AM

I dunno what the hell that is, but it sure ain't Head and Shoulders.

Gradual exhaustion of a short term reversal. I'm selling my trading margin.  Start buying again at 429.
Or i chase it uphill if I am wrong.  Hopefully by BTFDing.

Yeah I just got the last of my trading margin out @ $455, fully aware that could be the worst possible moment to go full fiat.

Don't do this at home, kids.

Bitcoin is helluva drug.

Got that right.



1215. Post 6120393 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on April 08, 2014, 04:43:52 AM
"an old trend may not be your friend."

we're in a reversal... weather it drops lower or not is irrelevant.

How can it be a reversal without resolution on the China Issue? The Chinese have hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of BTC to dump if they panic when one of the major exchanges goes dark. They will be a minor force for fiat flow into BTC for a long time and a potentially major flow out. Trends don't reverse on their own. Something has to happen, like when Silk Road closed or when Gox finally died. At the minimum, support has to be tested with volume.


by this logic alone you shouldn't have even thought of going long, the Chinese news hasn't really changed since Dec 5th, which carried a rumor ban of Jan 31st etc etc

none the less the sheep sit on a fence where they go its banned its not banned, while I sit here and wonder how many Chinese wealthy bought on huge dips

Yeah, I was a dumb-ass. I may still be a dumb-ass. The market gets the final word. My thinking at the time was that there was a rumor that had been refuted by the PBoC a week earlier, and this one would be too. I thought the story was a Dorian (unconfirmed rumor by one irresponsible reporter), but it turns out it was more likely a goxxing (no news is horrible news).

It seems we are developing our own vocabulary.



1216. Post 6120444 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Does anyone else get the feeling like the dread is starting to sink into the last of the permabulls? I know that feeling. Maybe it's projection, buy I can almost hear the hope dying.



1217. Post 6120511 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: Dabs on April 08, 2014, 05:10:35 AM
Does anyone else get the feeling like the dread is starting to sink into the last of the permabulls? I know that feeling. Maybe it's projection, buy I can almost hear the hope dying.

I think I'm a permabull. Going to double my coins again soon. Smiley

You could do that by selling them now and buying them back at half price. (I'm exaggerating. maybe.)



1218. Post 6120758 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 08, 2014, 05:25:18 AM
Does anyone else get the feeling like the dread is starting to sink into the last of the permabulls? I know that feeling. Maybe it's projection, buy I can almost hear the hope dying.

Probably gonna need a much worse situation than this... before the dread really begins to kick in... somewhere around 1 year of floating between $400 and $500 or maybe some additional downward movement slowly over the next six months bringing prices to lower $300 would begin to increase some dread levels. 

I'm thinking the circumstances are NOT quite dire enough yet, especially reviewing some of the history in which the price reduced to 1/16th... wow... we are NOT even close to that, yet.  Maybe we are getting closer to the 1/3rd reduction territory... so seems that there is a ways to go before dread really will start to materialize... I would think.

I meant permabull active traders with open orders. Guys like me staring staring at the graphs, wanting the arrow to move up like the way some rabid sports fans think that their team still has a prayer when the coach has already substituted third string players and the other fans are starting to leave.



1219. Post 6120972 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: shmadz on April 08, 2014, 06:03:44 AM
Does anyone else get the feeling like the dread is starting to sink into the last of the permabulls? I know that feeling. Maybe it's projection, buy I can almost hear the hope dying.

Probably gonna need a much worse situation than this... before the dread really begins to kick in... somewhere around 1 year of floating between $400 and $500 or maybe some additional downward movement slowly over the next six months bringing prices to lower $300 would begin to increase some dread levels. 

I'm thinking the circumstances are NOT quite dire enough yet, especially reviewing some of the history in which the price reduced to 1/16th... wow... we are NOT even close to that, yet.  Maybe we are getting closer to the 1/3rd reduction territory... so seems that there is a ways to go before dread really will start to materialize... I would think.

I meant permabull active traders with open orders. Guys like me staring staring at the graphs, wanting the arrow to move up like the way some rabid sports fans think that their team still has a prayer when the coach has already substituted third string players and the other fans are starting to leave.

never leave before it's over.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDbEX666G3Y

go oilers! Smiley

The weird thing about day trading is that you actually do have the ability to move the graph, but only in the wrong direction. You can't move it by sheer force of will, so we come here to talk our book, hoping to convince other traders to see what *should* happen. It's probably futile, but sometimes crowd participation gives your team that tiny extra lift it needs.



1220. Post 6121020 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: TeeBone on April 08, 2014, 06:15:40 AM
This feels totally diffferent then the last 2 drops to 400. Almost everyone saw those flash crashes coming and that it would quickly rebound within hrs, which it did.

Here we are in the low/mid 400's for over a week and there is no mad rush to buy coins at this insanely 'discounted' price.

Permabulls are hoping for a hail-mary pass, but i just dont see it, i dont think we've grinded this far down for not at least a vicious 400 retest.

Sharks are waiting in the wings patiently. 400 is key, if that breaks watch the fuck out, it could drop like a rock to the 200's. This market is dying to shake out all the gamblers who bought in at 1K.

That's exactly how I see it too, but Bitcoin isn't known for being predictable.



1221. Post 6121245 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

China is going nuts. Moving average crossover on the 4 hr chart. Let's see if this has any steam.



1222. Post 6121326 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 08, 2014, 06:58:42 AM

here look at this line I fit on the graph. cool huh. (break out)

Looks like $445 was the double bottom for now unless some random anvil falls out of the sky, which only seems to happen when I'm the one standing underneath it.



1223. Post 6121410 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Y'all chase this rally if you want. Bitcoin's been good to me and I'm not going to be greedy. I'll stay with my low buy orders to provide a safety net in case this some kind of trap.

Bitcoin ate my greed.



1224. Post 6126446 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: roslinpl on April 08, 2014, 02:41:04 PM
458 or more
458 or more ! Smiley

Come on bitcoin! Smiley don't be shy! Fly like a bird Wink (like a bird that does fly high, like Tibetan geese - those can fly up to Everest height during their flight)

The air is very thin up there. Little air to support lift.



1225. Post 6126585 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Anyone notice that now $458 is compared to Mt. Everest, by a Bull!  My estimate that $400 will hold is back up to 60%.



1226. Post 6128110 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 08, 2014, 04:47:07 PM
you can't use bitcoin for electrical contacts.
+100

Jorge's like the villain in a cheap action movie. Bruised, battered and bleeding, Bitcoin keeps coming. He keeps wondering "Why won't you die??"



1227. Post 6129235 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 08, 2014, 05:04:24 PM
Jorge's like the villain in a cheap action movie. Bruised, battered and bleeding, Bitcoin keeps coming. He keeps wondering "Why won't you die??"

I came into the theater when the movie had already gone through three plot changes.  Maybe that is why I am still confused about who are the heroes and who are the villains.  Wink 

It's simple: A stable bitcoin is more valuable for transactions. When it becomes more valuable, the price goes up. When the price goes up too far, it looses value for transactions and the price drops until it finds a new base and stabilizes. Rinse and repeat.

A falling bitcoin becomes more attractive the more it falls. It may be attractive to only one person, some idiot like me who thinks that dying with the biggest pile would be kind of neat. As long as there is one person buying, the price will never drop to zero.  Price stabilizes when exactly half the market thinks it is overvalued and half think it is undervalued. This means corrections, overcorrections, and finally, stability...until it's transactional value rises again. As long as it has some value at all, it has potentially near-unlimited value.

~$450 could very well be the base for the next rally. It may be lower, but it's unlikely going to be much higher. Every day we stay in this range creates a stronger psychological impression that higher priced coins are expensive. It would even possibly cause a slow slide into oblivion if it wasn't being compared to State-backed currency which has a much greater probability of a slow slide into oblivion.

We'll find a base somewhere. The get-rich-quick crowd will eventually figure out that the next ATH is many months if not years away, and reluctantly give us hodlers their coins. As soon as the last one of them throws in the towel, the trend will reverse.



1228. Post 6132381 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Those walls are lining up because it is very probable that in the next few days, a major Chinese exchange is going to go dark. There will likely be a wave of selling pressure that will test $400 level. If it holds, it will be tested again when the next one closes. and again. and again until the sellers break through or are repulsed.

The Bitcoin market acts as a prediction market http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market. The prices are signals. I paid attention to those market signals and saved myself from getting wiped out when Gox shut its doors, but I lost thousands when ignoring those signals a week ago. Prices convey information. I didn't help build those buy walls to push the price up. That would be stupid. I'd have to pay more to get my coins back. We are trying to keep the price from going down. We are not trying to make money. We are trying to save money, and our effort may or may not be successful.

The prices tell us a China dump or waves of dumps are likely incoming. People have spent millions of dollars to convey that to you. We have sold coins at ridiculously cheap prices to build those walls because it's all we could do. Anyone buying now rather than building the walls is likely throwing money away.

I have tens of thousands of dollars in buy orders sitting on the exchanges and all I want to do is buy my coins back, but I can't yet. The order book is telling me that the risk of missing cheaper coins is roughly twice as high as the risk of missing the next choo choo. The bigger the buy and sell walls get, the less likely this is some kind of elaborate manipulation.

Learn from my mistakes or make your own.



1229. Post 6132891 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 08, 2014, 09:59:33 PM

Greed may even destroy bitcoins most praised quality, its planned scarcity.  I don't  see what could prevent that.

It's painfully obvious that you are not an economist. An economist always asks "as compared to what?"  Is Bitcoin more vulnerable to exploitation from the greedy than say U.S. Dollars? I would argue that the answer is obviously "no" but you haven't even considered the question.

I imagine you think "well, but dollar supply is managed by central bank professionals who act selflessly".  as if banksters aren't subject to the same human frailties as everybody else. I trust selfish people to act selfishly more than I trust selfless people to act selflessly. From an economic perspective, I see it as a matter of incentives.

Bitcoin doesn't need central bankers because it has day traders and investors who have a stronger incentive to inject and withdraw liquidity at the right moment than Janet Yellen has to do the same at the Fed.


    "It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a 'dismal science.' But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance." ~ Murray Rothbard




1230. Post 6133131 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 08, 2014, 11:06:16 PM
buy?

That all depends on your portfolio, risk tolerance and time preference. I'm full fiat in my trading account as a hedge on my cold storage. on average, it's always a good time to buy. My dad bought at the top of the 2011 bubble and it still turned out to be a pretty good deal. However there is likely to be an opportunity to buy lower in the next few days. 



1231. Post 6133176 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 08, 2014, 11:19:03 PM
Those walls are lining up because it is very probable that in the next few days, a major Chinese exchange is going to go dark.

Can I ask you where the hell did you heard this? I know that you're short... But seriously, do you also need to spread the FUD?
THEY ARE STOPPING 3rd PARTY DEPOSITS. They said that already in december.


Did you read what I wrote? I heard it from the chart, from the thousands of people who sold and haven't bought back yet. TA is real. I found that out the hard way.



1232. Post 6133331 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on April 08, 2014, 11:26:01 PM
don't mind billy his stuck in disbear mode, c'est la vie

The chart has me stuck in bear mode. I'm not happy about it. You think I want my funds parked in stinking, depreciating fiat?



1233. Post 6133394 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 08, 2014, 11:42:34 PM
Those walls are lining up because it is very probable that in the next few days, a major Chinese exchange is going to go dark.

Can I ask you where the hell did you heard this? I know that you're short... But seriously, do you also need to spread the FUD?
THEY ARE STOPPING 3rd PARTY DEPOSITS. They said that already in december.


Did you read what I wrote? I heard it from the chart, from the thousands of people who sold and haven't bought back yet. TA is real. I found that out the hard way.

Am, ok. Not sure how to comment on this.
You do realize those people can be easy manipulated... most of them usualy sell at the bottom. That is how it works.

I hope this is the bottom. I hope a rally starts now and goes on forever. I would love to be wrong.



1234. Post 6133513 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: hdbuck on April 08, 2014, 11:51:55 PM
the more time passes at this stable price, the more likely it will go up from there, but it be a last bulltrap before finally final deep capitulation too Cheesy

On what time frame? Sure, it could easily creep up a few dollars or even have another sucker's rally, but markets hate uncertainty and I doubt there will be substantial upward movement until resolution on the China Issue. There would need to be a bullish factor that outweighed the potential of tens of thousands of coins being dumped in the Middle Kingdom. It's just a few days. We should know what's what by the 15th. If you don't have asymmetric information, you have to rely on TA and patience.



1235. Post 6133577 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 08, 2014, 11:57:37 PM
I hope this is the bottom. I hope a rally starts now and goes on forever. I would love to be wrong.


Well I'm not saying you're wrong... the price can stil drop lower. I just can't understand the words about exchange going dark. Was nowhere written nothing about that.
And I really don't care much in which way we are going... Not selling my btc for at least a year, while I will be happy to trade with ltc and getting more of them  Wink

You can also double your coins hypothetically by selling before a plunge and buying back half price. If I had done that in 2011, 2012, or last year, I would be a multimillionaire now.



1236. Post 6133798 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 09, 2014, 12:19:10 AM
The miners decide what the rules are.  Increasingly, that means ghash.io, discus fish, eligius, and btcguild.  Biggest threat to bitcoin today.


Instead of the word "threat," you must really mean biggest "vulnerability"? 

If the miners were to be infiltrated, then could destroy bitcoin, and I suppose there could be some miner-related battles in the future and attempts to figure out what is "good for" bitcoin.

I don't see any way to destroy Bitcoin that wouldn't hurt the destroyer even worse. It would take $20 billion to ensure it could be done and any failed attempt would make it more difficult to try again. You could really hurt it for much less, but not kill it and it would come back stronger. Even if you did kill it, another crypto would replace it almost immediately. You can't kill a protocol.  The laws of economics are immune to legislative fiat.



1237. Post 6133946 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 09, 2014, 12:31:36 AM
@billy

About major Chinies exchanges going dark  Wink

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=562524.0


I don't know and can't know exactly how it will play out and I am going to buy back my coins on the 15th if not before, I just don't know at what price. If you take exception to the term "going dark" then replace it with "liquidity event".  I am betting that people smarter and richer than me are acting in their own best interest. That's not a foolproof assumption, but it is a useful guide.



1238. Post 6134165 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on April 09, 2014, 01:08:22 AM
Mine pool owners might also act under coercion.
Damaging things may be done willfully or not, the vulnerability is simply the concentrated power to do them.  Self interest is a necessary protection but not a sufficient one.

Mining is distributed. Pools kind of screw that up the way political parties kind of screw up democracy but in both cases, the effect is limited, because participation in a pool or party is voluntary. Pools and parties come and go. I'd like to go to a pool party right now.



1239. Post 6134261 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: CoinRocka on April 09, 2014, 01:18:02 AM
I was just thinking about 2 hrs ago that this volume feels like the calm before the storm.

What if this is the calm before the next calm? When the forces are lined up on the battlefield, usually the first guy across the line gets his ass shot off.



1240. Post 6134768 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: windjc on April 09, 2014, 01:54:28 AM
Little breakout on daily possibly starting, going to 530 max if longs are lucky but probably more like 500. After that, downtrend resumes and eventually 400 is broken.

Well at this point if it goes up it is only going up because enough traders like you are looking at the daily MACD and saying "we'll it should go up now".  So yes I guess if one of you places a big market order and everyone starts chasing the signal the are waiting for then we could squeeze to 500.

But I expect a rally to be much less than what everyone is expecting. Because there is so little money buying now organically.

It just doesn't seem to be worth the risk. If you're looking around the poker table and you can't spot the sucker, then you are the sucker. I think the bulls are likely exhausted. I know I am. I plan to go down defending $400 or get left behind if the defense isn't needed.



1241. Post 6134831 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: TERA on April 09, 2014, 02:28:39 AM
Also, a price supported by entirely by holding and not by buyers is very weak - it is unusable by merchants due to the lack of liquidity. It is in effect a ponzi scheme.

You should be ashamed of yourself for being involved.  What would your mother think?  Go away.

I have a history of trading ponzi schemes actually, and then getting out just in time before they collapse. It all started when I was 18 years old and I partipated in a ponzi called "12 daily pro", turning $5,000 into $15,000 in a few weeks. Of course the members insisted that it was not a ponzi at the time. It was.. "the future of advertising and multi level marketing" bla bla.


LOL. You're the Green Lumber Trader.  http://nassimtaleb.org/2012/08/nassim-talebs-green-lumber-problem/#.U0SxlVdWhEM




1242. Post 6139149 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 09, 2014, 03:02:29 AM
Also note there are no 1,500BTC bid walls accumulating coins this time.

no one is interested in the 500BTC wall on btc-e tho.

volume is low because we accumulated so many god damn hodlers invested for the future.

don't expect them to all panic sell at once because china banned bitcoin 5 times in april.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG1qooBzE2w&feature=share&list=PL3C264C70646796C4&index=4

December 2013  - oh shit!!!!! china bans bitcoin

January 2014  - you know what ?  bitcoin is going to banned in china at the end of January

February 2014  - NEWS FLASH -  china bans bitcoin

March 2014  - guess what china is banning?

April 2014  - fill in the blank---- China is going to ban [______]  come on, you can do it.  guess.

December 2013 oh shit!! Mt Gox is insolvent!

January 2014 you know what? Mt Gox is going to be insolvent at the end of January

February 2014 - NEWS FLASH- Mt Gox is insolvent

February 28 - We regret to inform you that due to rumors, we are temporarily suspending deposits...



1243. Post 6143854 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Looking at the volume, it appears to be one of the tremors before the big quake. The recovery to $445 is on no volume at all. I pulled one of my re-buy orders until I find out what the hell is going on. How can there be that many limit buy orders with no market-order buying?

There appears to be much expectation for a major liquidity event in the downward direction. There is a minute chance that this is a head-fake by whales, but I seriously doubt it.
If you can't spot the sucker at the poker table, then you are the sucker. I'm folding my hand to conserve chips.



1244. Post 6145612 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 09, 2014, 06:42:56 PM
Looking at the volume, it appears to be one of the tremors before the big quake. The recovery to $445 is on no volume at all. I pulled one of my re-buy orders until I find out what the hell is going on. How can there be that many limit buy orders with no market-order buying?

There appears to be much expectation for a major liquidity event in the downward direction. There is a minute chance that this is a head-fake by whales, but I seriously doubt it.
If you can't spot the sucker at the poker table, then you are the sucker. I'm folding my hand to conserve chips.

What's that mean, exactly? 

I thought that you were all in Fiat at $456 or $458 or something like that. 

So at this point, you could buy some BTC back at a profit, no? and then if we dip lower, buy some more... unless you are saying that you are just going to sit out this roller coaster (a kind of train) in fiat?   

Personally, I would rather sit it out in BTC, but each of us have our own levels of diversification or hedge.

A 6$ profit after a $600 drop from the ATH? Yeah, I'll get right on that.


That's just it. Since most of my holdings are in cold storage, I'm using my trading stash as a hedge right now. I've seen bitcoin prices go stupid high and stupid low. They are low now, but they aren't stupid low, considering China AND Gox.  I'm a Bitcoin true believer, but I think that works against me as a day trader. I'm trying to zero out my bias, but I may be overdoing it. I don't know what to do. I suspect that these buy walls are not there out of demand for cheap coins, but out of fear of a further drop. There is almost nothing on the other side of $400.



1245. Post 6146628 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 09, 2014, 07:29:42 PM
Looking at the volume, it appears to be one of the tremors before the big quake. The recovery to $445 is on no volume at all. I pulled one of my re-buy orders until I find out what the hell is going on. How can there be that many limit buy orders with no market-order buying?

There appears to be much expectation for a major liquidity event in the downward direction. There is a minute chance that this is a head-fake by whales, but I seriously doubt it.
If you can't spot the sucker at the poker table, then you are the sucker. I'm folding my hand to conserve chips.

What's that mean, exactly? 

I thought that you were all in Fiat at $456 or $458 or something like that. 

So at this point, you could buy some BTC back at a profit, no? and then if we dip lower, buy some more... unless you are saying that you are just going to sit out this roller coaster (a kind of train) in fiat?   

Personally, I would rather sit it out in BTC, but each of us have our own levels of diversification or hedge.

A 6$ profit after a $600 drop from the ATH? Yeah, I'll get right on that.


That's just it. Since most of my holdings are in cold storage, I'm using my trading stash as a hedge right now. I've seen bitcoin prices go stupid high and stupid low. They are low now, but they aren't stupid low, considering China AND Gox.  I'm a Bitcoin true believer, but I think that works against me as a day trader. I'm trying to zero out my bias, but I may be overdoing it. I don't know what to do. I suspect that these buy walls are not there out of demand for cheap coins, but out of fear of a further drop. There is almost nothing on the other side of $400.

dont look at the wall, there's MASSIVE support under 400 its just not shown,

i have no bids under 400

but i will buy under 400 if we go there.

I have orders in for 20,000 bitcoins if it drops below 10 cents. Hey, it's happened before.



1246. Post 6146773 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 09, 2014, 08:16:34 PM
Looking at the volume, it appears to be one of the tremors before the big quake. The recovery to $445 is on no volume at all. I pulled one of my re-buy orders until I find out what the hell is going on. How can there be that many limit buy orders with no market-order buying?

There appears to be much expectation for a major liquidity event in the downward direction. There is a minute chance that this is a head-fake by whales, but I seriously doubt it.
If you can't spot the sucker at the poker table, then you are the sucker. I'm folding my hand to conserve chips.

What's that mean, exactly?  

I thought that you were all in Fiat at $456 or $458 or something like that.  

So at this point, you could buy some BTC back at a profit, no? and then if we dip lower, buy some more... unless you are saying that you are just going to sit out this roller coaster (a kind of train) in fiat?  

Personally, I would rather sit it out in BTC, but each of us have our own levels of diversification or hedge.

A 6$ profit after a $600 drop from the ATH? Yeah, I'll get right on that.


That's just it. Since most of my holdings are in cold storage, I'm using my trading stash as a hedge right now. I've seen bitcoin prices go stupid high and stupid low. They are low now, but they aren't stupid low, considering China AND Gox.  I'm a Bitcoin true believer, but I think that works against me as a day trader. I'm trying to zero out my bias, but I may be overdoing it. I don't know what to do. I suspect that these buy walls are not there out of demand for cheap coins, but out of fear of a further drop. There is almost nothing on the other side of $400.


Why would anyone put in orders below $400, when the probability of such seems so low and also, seems that they have to get through the supra $400 walls first?    

And, the truth of the matter, seems to be a broken record repeated theme that NONE of us really knows which way it is gonna go.  We seemed to have gotten another $10 squeeze downward this morning, which caused me to buy a little more. I would be very surprised to see anything much below $420 - for more than a flash crash... ... but, yep, anything remains within the realm of possibilities.... including the suggestion that something fishy is up.. especially, if we have a mini dump .. and suspecting something else will follow from that.

I think the probability is 40% that we will go lower. rpietila thinks the probability is 30% and TERA thinks it is over 50% (eventually).  There is a remote chance that an early adopter could dump and trigger a panic. I can't make a meaningful difference @ $400, but I can lower down. Consider me Black Swan insurance.



1247. Post 6146876 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunk_costs

FWIW, I think bitcoin is really under-priced right now, but I also know that Keynes was right when he said that markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. I need to position myself to take advantage of that irrationality should it continue rather than be at it's mercy.




1248. Post 6147524 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

There are many ways to manipulate a market, but the ultimate enemy of a manipulator is time. If you have the patience, price will always return to it's real value. If it doesn't return ,then by definition it's not manipulation.

What really worries me is the talk of the bulls on this thread. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunk_costs.  The sunken cost fallacy is a real observed market phenomenon.
Most of you have not had to hold an underwater bitcoin position for years. I have. It was not a smart thing to do. It was an act of faith. How strong is your bitcoin faith? The market will test you.

Bitcoin isn't dead. Not even close, but if you don't think it's even possible to get much much worse before it gets better, then I can assure you it can. With all the talk about Gox and China, what worries me is if some other completely unrelated disaster happens before we've recovered. Bad guys don't play fair. They will kick you when you're down. They are out there. I'm intentionally being discouraging right now. It's better to get out now if you're going to get out than to hold on until you can't hold on any longer.  Bitcoin doesn't need you to go broke for the cause. Honey Badger don't care.



1249. Post 6147900 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: Zule on April 09, 2014, 10:22:40 PM
There are many ways to manipulate a market, but the ultimate enemy of a manipulator is time. If you have the patience, price will always return to it's real value. If it doesn't return ,then by definition it's not manipulation.

What really worries me is the talk of the bulls on this thread. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunk_costs.  The sunken cost fallacy is a real observed market phenomenon.
Most of you have not had to hold an underwater bitcoin position for years. I have. It was not a smart thing to do. It was an act of faith. How strong is your bitcoin faith? The market will test you.

Bitcoin isn't dead. Not even close, but if you don't think it's even possible to get much much worse before it gets better, then I can assure you it can. With all the talk about Gox and China, what worries me is if some other completely unrelated disaster happens before we've recovered. Bad guys don't play fair. They will kick you when you're down. They are out there. I'm intentionally being discouraging right now. It's better to get out now if you're going to get out than to hold on until you can't hold on any longer.  Bitcoin doesn't need you to go broke for the cause. Honey Badger don't care.
If you acted like a responsible person you wouldnt invest more than you felt comfortable loosing in a ultra high risk venture. That said, all the drama with sunk cost and market testing FUD wouldnt be so hard on you, you could just sit back and take a sneak peak once a week/month.
Another thing too, I dont take any advice from users with begging addresses, and I suggest the same to others

Are waitresses beggars? If you like what you read, feel free to tip or not. Such hostility. Must have hit a nerve. If I acted like a responsible person, I wouldn't have tens of thousands of dollars in my trading account. I thought I explained that. You are correct that it's an ultra high risk venture and my advice is worth what you paid for it. I'm just a guy with a point of view worth no more or less than any given other. Peace, Bro.



1250. Post 6148119 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: oda.krell on April 09, 2014, 11:03:08 PM
There are many ways to manipulate a market, but the ultimate enemy of a manipulator is time. If you have the patience, price will always return to it's real value. If it doesn't return ,then by definition it's not manipulation.

What really worries me is the talk of the bulls on this thread. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunk_costs.  The sunken cost fallacy is a real observed market phenomenon.
Most of you have not had to hold an underwater bitcoin position for years. I have. It was not a smart thing to do. It was an act of faith. How strong is your bitcoin faith? The market will test you.

Bitcoin isn't dead. Not even close, but if you don't think it's even possible to get much much worse before it gets better, then I can assure you it can. With all the talk about Gox and China, what worries me is if some other completely unrelated disaster happens before we've recovered. Bad guys don't play fair. They will kick you when you're down. They are out there. I'm intentionally being discouraging right now. It's better to get out now if you're going to get out than to hold on until you can't hold on any longer.  Bitcoin doesn't need you to go broke for the cause. Honey Badger don't care.
If you acted like a responsible person you wouldnt invest more than you felt comfortable loosing in a ultra high risk venture. That said, all the drama with sunk cost and market testing FUD wouldnt be so hard on you, you could just sit back and take a sneak peak once a week/month.
Another thing too, I dont take any advice from users with begging addresses, and I suggest the same to others

Are waitresses beggars? If you like what you read, feel free to tip or not. Such hostility. Must have hit a nerve. If I acted like a responsible person, I wouldn't have tens of thousands of dollars in my trading account. I thought I explained that. You are correct that it's an ultra high risk venture and my advice is worth what you paid for it. I'm just a guy with a point of view worth no more or less than any given other. Peace, Bro.

So, what's your position (in total, I mean) these days, if you don't mind the question? Less than 50% of total USD value in BTC, or more?

My trading account is 99% fiat. It was a fraction of my bitcoin holdings, although I'm not a whale. I have less than 1000 BTC.   I started buying in 2011 and my average buy in is <$40. The first BTC I bought was for $5.90, but I lost some when Trade Hill, Bitmarket.eu and bitoption.com failed. That's as much as I care to disclose.



1251. Post 6148495 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Possible inverted head and shoulders forming on the stamp 15 minute chart.

EDIT: nope.  The leak in the dam is getting bigger.



1252. Post 6150133 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Huobi dump incoming. We're running a Walmart special on Chinese coins!



1253. Post 6150235 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: seleme on April 10, 2014, 03:02:15 AM
Shit hitting the fan  Grin

This ain't nothin yet. Buckle up.



1254. Post 6150336 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 10, 2014, 03:21:18 AM
close enough to my 429 mark.  i start buying now

May the Force be with you. I pulled my $432 this morning.



1255. Post 6150425 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Look at the volume. It's looking like another dead cat bounce so far.



1256. Post 6150690 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

I think I was born with excessive empathy. I feel horrible for you guys and I'm full fiat. You're buying into a meat grinder. Hidden miracle whale is your only hope. I could throw everything I have at that and it wouldn't make a hiccup. The ask walls are dropping. 1100 coins to $445.

make that 1200 coins.   



1257. Post 6150755 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

8K Wall at $400 is only at 5K now!  It's getting weaker, not stronger.  Fuck me. This is bad.



1258. Post 6150976 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

There's going to be some resistance at $415 and $400, but the bid walls are getting smaller. Some people are moving them back. Some are just pulling them.  Probability of breach up to 50/50. The Whales are swimming deep in the order book.



1259. Post 6151151 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 10, 2014, 04:57:47 AM
Much more pleasant that previous lows.  No ddos. No large embezzlement.

Maybe that's because it isn't the low.  $400 is likely to be the base for the next rally sometime around November if we're lucky.



1260. Post 6151415 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

I BEGGED you assholes to dump on the dead cat bounce and buy back when $400 was retested. You could have increased your BTC holdings without spending an extra dime.




1261. Post 6151460 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

ok, with no whale intervention here's what's going to happen: There will be a bounce off of $400. Sell it when it levels out. Buy back in on the next retest or STAY in FIAT until the whales show up in the $300s.   

 



1262. Post 6151711 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: seleme on April 10, 2014, 05:53:17 AM
I BEGGED you assholes to dump on the dead cat bounce and buy back when $400 was retested. You could have increased your BTC holdings without spending an extra dime.



Says the asshole who was insulting other people's mums when everybody with half brain could saw it's going below 600$.

Fuck off you moron, don't play the smart arse game here..

I'm gonna fuck off with the thousands of dollars I saved today by going full fiat. Jesus, you're still sore about that? Let it go, Man. I gave you credit for your good call, now give me credit for mine. Or give me your mom's number (I think I lost it).



1263. Post 6151948 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: molecular on April 10, 2014, 06:28:56 AM
I BEGGED you assholes to dump on the dead cat bounce and buy back when $400 was retested. You could have increased your BTC holdings without spending an extra dime.



Says the asshole who was insulting other people's mums when everybody with half brain could saw it's going below 600$.

Fuck off you moron, don't play the smart arse game here..

I'm gonna fuck off with the thousands of dollars I saved today by going full fiat. Jesus, you're still sore about that? Let it go, Man. I gave you credit for your good call, now give me credit for mine. Or give me your mom's number (I think I lost it).

I'm not really 100% sure, but personal empirical evidence suggests that starting out a conversation with "you assholes" usually doesn't lead to fruitful outcomes in the short, medium or long term.

EDIT: so yeah, fuck off, billyjoeallen.


Ouch. How much have you lost so far? 



1264. Post 6152107 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: magicmexican on April 10, 2014, 06:59:30 AM
Well this is starting to get boring. The whole btc-china thing already feels like one of those dragon ball Z fights that lasts 50 episodes.

I did like the Gox arc way more.

You're probably not going to like it when it gets exciting again. Five days is a Looooong time to hold $400 with shrinking buy walls.



1265. Post 6155599 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 10, 2014, 07:17:26 AM
I BEGGED you assholes to dump on the dead cat bounce and buy back when $400 was retested. You could have increased your BTC holdings without spending an extra dime.




YEAH.... right.. .NOW you are calling names and acting self-righteous...  You can really be a turd.. sometimes..  ... while you are shitting your pants a day ago... ..

This current situation was hardly very probable in the minds of many of us, as you know different people gave their probabilities, and you even succumbed to describing this scenario as a long shot.

I'm not being self-righteous. I'm mad and probably too emotional. It was such a senseless loss. I didn't gain a penny from this. I sold, but didn't margin short. The people who did margin short prevented the $400 Wall breach when they closed their short positions. The good decentral bankers of bitcoin. The rest of us paid them to do their job.

My outlook now is the same as last night. 50/50 chance of a $400 breech. Huobi is priced in more, but I still think there is too much hope that they will be able to find a replacement bank. The volume of the $400 support wall test was pretty much exactly what I expected, so there is no new information about whether or not it will hold.

This is Bitcoin. It will make you tough, it will make you smart, or it will make you broke.



1266. Post 6155632 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Cup and handle. Here comes the bounce. Sell @ $420-430. 



1267. Post 6156795 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: seanneko on April 10, 2014, 12:51:59 PM
Cup and handle. Here comes the bounce. Sell @ $420-430. 

I see no cup and handle. It went $440 -> $410 then has sat around there for a few hours now.

Right. I was hoping some of you who hadn't already sold would have a chance to sell less painlessly. I could tell it was another dead cat bounce when volume petered out instead of building.

After further review of the order book, My highest buy order now is around $300 with a possible flash crash to ~$156 on Bitfinex, the place where the order book has the same number of bids as asks. The possible short squeeze target is ~ $588. These estimates are subject to change as the order book changes.

The trend is not reversed and only has an 85% chance of reversing even after the China situation is resolved. IF it is resolved. Something has to happen in order for a downtrend to be reversed equal in magnitude to the thing that caused it. In short, it likely has to get worse before it gets better.

My highest buy order before April $15 is near $300 and that may be too optimistic. Successful day trading requires you to quickly reassess situations, cut losses and turn on a dime if new information warrants. I still see no signs of hidden support. I'm hoping that's because it is too well hidden and not because it doesn't exist.



1268. Post 6157183 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

You guys don't seem to understand the basic function of day trading. Your job is to punish volatility. You make several bets and most of them lose. You loose 1%, lose 1%, lose 1%, make 5%. Like playing poker. Unsuccessful day traders do the opposite. In a down trend, you bank your profits in fiat. In an up trend, you bank your profits in BTC.

Calling the bottom or top is something you do after the fact.

I've paid a lot of money to learn these simple truths. A wise person would learn from my mistakes.



1269. Post 6157812 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on April 10, 2014, 02:37:13 PM
This is ridiculous. This isn't panic selling. This is trying to take Bitcoin down. Will it ever stop? Who are these people? Hasn't it been enough already?

We're not taking it down. We're trying to find a bottom so we can turn this shit around.

$400 breeched!  Next support level is $380, then $300, then $266$




1270. Post 6158088 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: dreamspark on April 10, 2014, 03:18:27 PM
Im buying...

There's no volume defense at all! You're buying into a fucking blender.



1271. Post 6158207 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Sell, you bastards! Sell why you still can. If we hurry, we can still catch 300 or $266 support before this turns into another 2011.

otherwise, whales are our only hope.



1272. Post 6158338 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: cbeast on April 10, 2014, 03:43:53 PM
I can ignore the loudmouth newbies, but where are the technical analysts?

placing market sell orders.



1273. Post 6158608 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 10, 2014, 03:54:52 PM
After   BTC will hit 9$ it will never rise again., and became history.

Butbut, how quickly do I have to buy before the last node of the network is closed?  Shocked

ADD: Sorry, I was panicking. I forgot that I realized already more than a year ago that I alone can keep Bitcoin up + its price at something between $0.1-$1. Multiply by 100 similarly devoted people and do the math Smiley 

Indeed. I literally have buy orders for 60,000 BTC under $1.00 right now.



1274. Post 6158824 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: soullyG on April 10, 2014, 03:57:47 PM
[snip]

otherwise, whales are our only hope.

Princess Billy Joe? Grin



Huobi Wan Kenobi has turned to the Dark Side.

At some point, the fear of missing the bottom will be greater than the fear of having to hold for years. That point is somewhere almost certainly south of $380.



1275. Post 6158955 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: proudhon on April 10, 2014, 04:24:05 PM
Alright, old guard, we've done this all before.  Who's getting ready to increase their wealth again?



Honestly, that's sort of what's it's been like over the past 3 years.  "Thank you, I'll take that.  Okay, I'll take yours too.  Yes, thank you."  Ok, good I've quadrupled my bitcoin holdings...<waits a few months>...aaaaaand I'm rich.

Yep. Pretty much. The trick is saving enough cash to wait out the wankers.



1276. Post 6159507 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

This is not a chart reversal pattern, not yet anyway. The way $400 fell so easily makes me think that there is more blood to come. Why head fake @ $380 when you can do it at $350? or $250?  15 minute chart looks like a mini version of the $710 whale. $382 will be retested. It looks like a false bottom so far. The enemy of the manipulator is time.



1277. Post 6159877 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

A $15 bounce off of the lowest low in four months and you are SURE the bottom is in before the down flag even closes on the 15 minute chart?? 

What are you smoking? You couldn't possibly be right except for dumb luck. People win lotteries. Most people lose. I play the odds.



1278. Post 6160167 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: gizmoh on April 10, 2014, 05:40:35 PM
We aren't going to reverse until a good chunk of leverage long positions of $15 million @ finex are purged.
Too many empty pocket traders are hoping right now..


I was already purged. I was one of them and I lost closing my leveraged long@ $478. I paid the tuition, lost a bundle and saved my ass. But I also know that Bitfinex doesn't lead this market.

The longer price drags on like this, the more likely this is another dead cat bounce. No volume. Leveraging short right now could be lucrative.



1279. Post 6160277 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: kurious on April 10, 2014, 05:49:41 PM
Also, when did proudhon and rpietlila show back up?

Just in time for the party?

They are making a near futile attempt to defend $480. Jawboning won't cut it. Gox and China are not additive downward forces. They are multiplicative.
The only known support level is at the pre-China ATH @ $266. I can't sleep with open buy orders much higher than that until I get new information.

If you want to take coins from us early adopters, wait until we can't hold out any longer. We have had negative income flows for four months. Embrace the pain.



1280. Post 6160699 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 10, 2014, 05:57:17 PM
I could recall some better times from Bitcoin  Cry

I doubt it.  When was the last time coins were this cheap?  2011?


That's the point, my friend. Buying at $10 after the June 2011 high of $32 seemed really smart...until they dropped to $2/BTC.  and stayed down for a year.  Whales may save us but it's a poor investment strategy to count on generous rich people to bail you out.  We're in a vice and they know it. How long are you prepared to wait? If you are not prepared, then I suggest you get prepared. Insurance is a bet you hope you lose.

Pay attention to the VOLUME moves. if $482 is successfully defended on HIGHER volume, the you can START looking for trend reversal signals.

Successfully day trading bitcoin has nothing to do with understanding it's revolutionary potential or many many many merits. It has to do with understanding order flows. TERA the Green Lumber Trader is better than me and she doesn't know jack about economics. She doesn't need to. She's a confessed ponzi trader. Doesn't matter. The original Green Lumber trader thought he was trading lumber painted green.  He made a fortune anyway.

Probability of a $380 wall breach: 70%.

Early adopter greed is what causes the volatility.  We didn't provide enough liquidity when the market needed it so we didn't have the cash to soak up that liquidity when it was excessive. I accept my share of the responsibility. I am likely going to pay for it in the next few months. The crash will be an opportunity for new blood which is needed for bitcoin to grow. Self fucking regulated. Satoshi was a genius.












1281. Post 6161046 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: fotosonics on April 10, 2014, 06:45:05 PM
I cant take it anymore

I have arranged to be cryogenically frozen.

they will though me out when bitcoin reaches 1,000,000$ or 2020 whichever comes first.

Its been fun guys.

see you in a few years, Hopefully sooner!



Best strategy. Same as hodling but without the drawn-out drama.

The only reason it's drawn out is because holders won't sell above a sustainable level. They're too afraid of missing the next rally which is months if not years away.



1282. Post 6161136 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: ampere9765 on April 10, 2014, 06:35:39 PM
Eventually we have a longstanding date set with 260

Ping pong until then. But sub-380 is a given

 Wink

I'm an optimist. I say $267.



1283. Post 6161390 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 10, 2014, 07:03:03 PM
That's the point, my friend. Buying at $10 after the June 2011 high of $32 seemed really smart...until they dropped to $2/BTC.  and stayed down for a year.  

The $10 buy wasn't just smart, it was genius.  Holding through the drawdown transcended genius itself.  You make a god-like move, and now you repent it?
I've heard that perfect is the enemy of good, but that's just crazy.



It was a good move, but hardly god-like. A god-like move would have me SHORTING at $10, buying back in at $2 and making 5X as much. or selling at $30 after my original buy- in @ $6, then buying back in at $3 and making 50X as much without spending an extra cent. I was just so afraid of missing the next choo choo train that didn't really come along until 2013.


I also lost a lot of those profits by keeping them on exchanges that shuttered. Sometimes keeping profits is as hard as making them, if not harder.





1284. Post 6161493 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: TERA on April 10, 2014, 07:26:51 PM
Don't worry wall street is moving in any day now. On Jun 1, btc will IPO on nasdaq and there will just be one giant candle to $5000 regardless of whatever the chart was.

Is there a way to set stop losses when margin shorting on bitfinex? or a way to automatically close them after making  say 5%?  I'd like to get a little bit back from of that $6K that I gave you, if you don't mind. Not that I'm complaining. I consider it tuition money.



1285. Post 6161577 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 10, 2014, 07:33:33 PM
Say what.....36% voters think btc over 500 on april 20th ? Talk about delusional.

That is soonish, and I did not vote so. But surely when it snaps back, 500 is the first line to fall, not the last. My forecast stands: "if 382 holds, 500 is breached by the end of month".

I think that's right also, but it won't hold. 75% probability of breach, IMHO.



1286. Post 6162617 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on April 10, 2014, 08:42:10 PM
its pretty funny to see asia above stamp lool

It happened all the time with Gox. Huobi is dying. The light bulb burns brighter before going out.



1287. Post 6162747 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Hmmmm. No mad scramble to buy $375 coins on BTC-e and arb them. Could it be that they would lose money by the time they transferred them to Stamp?



1288. Post 6162940 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

My friend rpietila seems nervous.  I am a Bitcoin true believer and when the chart tells my to buy, I will buy like a motherfucker, but right now I'm margin short and making money.





1289. Post 6163162 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

This is how $383 support is tested? on no volume? Bulls are doomed. They're not even putting up a fight yet. Turn off your computer and come back in a week. Your coins will still be there. They just won't be worth as much.



1290. Post 6163197 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Another dump on BTC-e!  $368



1291. Post 6163245 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: slapper on April 10, 2014, 09:49:08 PM
Another dump on BTC-e!  $368

$20 arb between Russia and China! Intense.

Crazy. This would open up compression trade possibilities if you had funds on both exchanges. I think BTC-e is gonna pull stamp lower, but it could go the other way.



1292. Post 6163387 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on April 10, 2014, 09:51:54 PM
This is how $383 support is tested? on no volume? Bulls are doomed. They're not even putting up a fight yet. Turn off your computer and come back in a week. Your coins will still be there. They just won't be worth as much.

Good advice. Just finished moving over to cold storage to prevent myself from doing anything rash and stupid.

Stupid is not doubling your stash by selling and buying back half price if you have the obvious opportunity to do so.



1293. Post 6163764 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Huobi's under 2400. Now the real panic begins.



1294. Post 6164049 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

How come nobody is exited about cheap coins?  I don't see ANY greed.



1295. Post 6164168 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

huobi now below 2350



1296. Post 6164440 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

I've made over $600 today in realized profits. I think it's going a lot lower, but I can't handle the pressure.

Not low enough to buy yet, of course.



1297. Post 6164619 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: ampere9765 on April 10, 2014, 11:55:21 PM
Miners are screwed, it is like 450 wasnt enough unprofitable, now they have to deal with 350  Cheesy

My main fear is that this draws out. If we see any decent sized time frame where larger miners are unprofitable on increasing scales, shit could hit the fan. hard.

Unlikely to happen, IMHO. Bitcoin now has 25% market cap of What's App.  This is pocket change for whales.



1298. Post 6164641 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Mining is no big deal issue. Half of all miners loose money. The difficulty will simply drop.  It's happened before.



1299. Post 6164865 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: porcupine87 on April 11, 2014, 12:05:53 AM
Mining is no big deal issue. Half of all miners loose money. The difficulty will simply drop.  It's happened before.

No! Why should the hashrate drop? Because they want to lose even more money?

Successful miners mine at a loss 90% of the time. That last 10% of the time, they make 20X% profits.  That's the way it works. It's the long game. The smart ones lock in operating expenses for years or donate to the Cause knowingly. The WANT difficulty to rise to the point that only they can continue to mine at all, much less mine profitably. Then they have cornered the market. It's not different incentive-wise to me wanting to die with the most coins.



1300. Post 6164950 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: hdbuck on April 11, 2014, 12:24:35 AM
WHO THE HELL IS STILL SELLING??!!!!

The smart people. Who the hell is buying? Every BTC holder will wish he had sold now and bought back lower. Who can stop the carnage? Greedy motherfuckers like me who want more coins. We aren't buying now because there is a high probability we won't have to. You didn't fuckin listen so now we do this the hard way.

The dumping is good for bitcoin. The trend couldn't reverse unless and until it happened. It may keep going down until even I fear insolvency. Bitcoin don't care.

You wanted free market money? You got it.



1301. Post 6165322 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

I love those guys who told me to fuck off. What am I doing now? fucking off. I'm not buying. You pissed off one of the guys who could save you. (not really. I'd have to care)

Should I start buying yet?

Nah. I can wait.

Will I miss the bottom? Prolly. I have so much cash I don't have to care. Some trader smarter than me will catch it and "save" Bitcoin without even meaning to. The decentral bankers of Bitcoin: The bad ones pay the good ones and the good ones reduce volatility. Clearly we need more good ones and that's what I'm learning to be.






1302. Post 6165454 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: seleme on April 11, 2014, 01:17:36 AM
I love those guys who told me to fuck off. What am I doing now? fucking off. I'm not buying. You pissed off one of the guys who could save you. (not really. I'd have to care)

Should I start buying yet?

Nah. I can wait.

Will I miss the bottom? Prolly. I have so much cash I don't have to care. Some trader smarter than me will catch it and "save" Bitcoin without even meaning to. The decentral bankers of Bitcoin: The bad ones pay the good ones and the good ones reduce volatility. Clearly we need more good ones and that's what I'm learning to be.


You could save me? Haha, well, fuck off again Mr. wanna be big dick with 20-30k $, I have more fiat waiting than you do  Grin

What a fucking deluded moron, sold at 450$ and he thinks he is some big motherfucker trader..


LOL. Yer gonna need all that fiat to buy coins that I bought for less than $40.  I will always have more coins than you. You know my day trading stash is a fraction of my holdings. Right? Don't take things so personally. Honey Badger Don't care. 

I'm a dumb-ass trader. But so are you. At least I know it.



1303. Post 6165540 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: David M on April 11, 2014, 01:29:05 AM
Wow, that was some dump at Stamp  Grin

I was starting to get worried my bid would not get hit.  All set now...

Capitulation? Nope. I can wait.



1304. Post 6165581 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: seleme on April 11, 2014, 01:36:52 AM
I love those guys who told me to fuck off. What am I doing now? fucking off. I'm not buying. You pissed off one of the guys who could save you. (not really. I'd have to care)

Should I start buying yet?

Nah. I can wait.

Will I miss the bottom? Prolly. I have so much cash I don't have to care. Some trader smarter than me will catch it and "save" Bitcoin without even meaning to. The decentral bankers of Bitcoin: The bad ones pay the good ones and the good ones reduce volatility. Clearly we need more good ones and that's what I'm learning to be.


You could save me? Haha, well, fuck off again Mr. wanna be big dick with 20-30k $, I have more fiat waiting than you do  Grin

What a fucking deluded moron, sold at 450$ and he thinks he is some big motherfucker trader..
.  

LOL. Yer gonna need all that fiat to buy coins that I bought for less than $40.  I will always have more coins than you. You know my day trading stash is a fraction of my holdings. Right? Don't take things so personally. Honey Badger Don't care.  

I'm a dumb-ass trader. But so are you. At least I know it.

Actually, my average BTC cost is less than 2$. And I bought my first BTC at 140$. Not bad, isn't it  Grin

And I'm not actually sure you have more coins than I do.. I'm taking it personal because you were disrespectful to my mum few weeks ago and since I can't make you eat your dirty tongue, insulting you here is unfortunately all I can.

I'm sorry for insulting your mum. That wasn't very classy of me.  Now will you GET THE FUCK OVER IT? Jesus, this is an internet forum, for chrissakes. Have some thick skin. I'm sure she's a wonderful person.




1305. Post 6165637 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: BitChick on April 11, 2014, 01:42:58 AM
Here is a approximate list of the bear markets Bitcoin has gone through..

32 -> 2 = 94% loss
266 -> 50 = 80% loss
1150 -> 350 = 70% loss



Jumping the gun there a little bit, aren't we?

Seems about right.  I guess the encouraging news is that the losses are getting smaller after each bubble. Smiley

Ma'am, you might need to prepare yourself for the possibility that that may not be the case.   



1306. Post 6165649 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: seleme on April 11, 2014, 01:44:15 AM
I love those guys who told me to fuck off. What am I doing now? fucking off. I'm not buying. You pissed off one of the guys who could save you. (not really. I'd have to care)

Should I start buying yet?

Nah. I can wait.

Will I miss the bottom? Prolly. I have so much cash I don't have to care. Some trader smarter than me will catch it and "save" Bitcoin without even meaning to. The decentral bankers of Bitcoin: The bad ones pay the good ones and the good ones reduce volatility. Clearly we need more good ones and that's what I'm learning to be.


You could save me? Haha, well, fuck off again Mr. wanna be big dick with 20-30k $, I have more fiat waiting than you do  Grin

What a fucking deluded moron, sold at 450$ and he thinks he is some big motherfucker trader..
.  

LOL. Yer gonna need all that fiat to buy coins that I bought for less than $40.  I will always have more coins than you. You know my day trading stash is a fraction of my holdings. Right? Don't take things so personally. Honey Badger Don't care.  

I'm a dumb-ass trader. But so are you. At least I know it.

Actually, my average BTC cost is less than 2$. And I bought my first BTC at 140$. Not bad, isn't it  Grin

And I'm not actually sure you have more coins than I do.. I'm taking it personal because you were disrespectful to my mum few weeks ago and since I can't make you eat your dirty tongue, insulting you here is unfortunately all I can.

I'm sorry for insulting your mum. That wasn't very classy of me.  Now will you GET THE FUCK OVER IT? Jesus, this is an internet forum, for chrissakes. Have some thick skin. I'm sure she's a wonderful person.



That's better. Internet or not, mums should be out of any arguments between people.

Fair enough. We cool?



1307. Post 6165677 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: pepo on April 11, 2014, 01:50:14 AM
IM MAKING AN ALLIN ON BTC , i bet anyone that in the next 30 days it will raise above 1.5k.

It appears you already made that bet in the market. I have no wish to take even more from the soon to be financially distressed. Good luck!



1308. Post 6165831 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: jonoiv on April 11, 2014, 01:55:29 AM


What colour candles you want?

Green, as always. Great big ones. I just don't expect them yet- but that's when they always come. 



1309. Post 6166026 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 11, 2014, 02:24:55 AM
this chinese issue has been around for weeks, seems like a red herring at this point

huobi has been leading the price up for several hours.  Well, two anyhow

on weak-ass volume. it's bearish, IMHO. The people left on Huobi are either delusional or are buying while they can before the exchange moves off shore.
Gox lead in November also.

Dead Cat Bounce...unless it isn't.



1310. Post 6166046 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: pepo on April 11, 2014, 02:27:23 AM
Im telling this now , bitcoin price in a few month 2-8 will be enourmous , everyone must understand , bitcoin is new . About the 2% of the world population knows that it exists , and from that 2% the 10% knows how it works. You must give time to the people to understand that it is best for us all.

After reading that, I literally pulled my buy order.



1311. Post 6166073 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: fallinglantern on April 11, 2014, 02:39:05 AM
here we go Cool

I can feel it coming

I feel it as well. The bounce off 339 to 374 is pretty strong.

Yes, possible short squeeze. Not a trend reversal, but fun to watch. Unless you're short.

Edit: $378! Ouch. Somebody got too greedy.



1312. Post 6166214 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: ampere9765 on April 11, 2014, 02:48:10 AM
It could be bounce time. No higher than 412 give or take. May get capped at that 380 level too

You think? The only people with any money left are bears. We got-em pretty good today.

Edit: Huobi dumping. Damn, missed another margin shorting opportunity.



1313. Post 6166338 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 11, 2014, 02:56:34 AM
I love those guys who told me to fuck off. What am I doing now? fucking off. I'm not buying. You pissed off one of the guys who could save you. (not really. I'd have to care)

Should I start buying yet?

Nah. I can wait.

Will I miss the bottom? Prolly. I have so much cash I don't have to care. Some trader smarter than me will catch it and "save" Bitcoin without even meaning to. The decentral bankers of Bitcoin: The bad ones pay the good ones and the good ones reduce volatility. Clearly we need more good ones and that's what I'm learning to be.


OK... GOOD bye....

 Maybe you will buy back in at $700?  Losing out may come when a guy get's too greedy...

Losing out at cheap coins may come when you are impatient. The only thing I think I'm missing out on now is the opportunity to punish the optimistic. From an ROI perspective, it doesn't matter how many coins you buy or at what price. It only matters that you get the direction of price travel right and the amount of movement.

Run along, now. Daddy's got work to do.



1314. Post 6166378 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: BitChick on April 11, 2014, 03:00:52 AM
It seems that it takes a little longer to "dump" than to "pump".  Any thoughts?  Is the price going to go back up faster than it went down or am I just being my typical optimistic bullish self?  Grin

Sunken cost fallacy. It's hard to pry money from the suckers. You have to wait them out.



1315. Post 6166582 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: TERA on April 11, 2014, 03:31:46 AM
OKCoin introducing some rechargeable codes or whatever...

https://www.okcoin.com/t-1008310.html
I wish they would stop with this neverending chinese scam of pumping bitcoin by trying to convince us that they can subvert their government somehow. It is just going to lead to yet another delayed crash and more hurt people later.

Bitcoin is subversive of governments by design. Doesn't mean OKCoin is going to do it, though. Hurting people financially is sometimes the best way of teaching them. You've taught me a good lesson or two that way.



1316. Post 6166609 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 11, 2014, 03:41:04 AM
I love those guys who told me to fuck off. What am I doing now? fucking off. I'm not buying. You pissed off one of the guys who could save you. (not really. I'd have to care)

Should I start buying yet?

Nah. I can wait.

Will I miss the bottom? Prolly. I have so much cash I don't have to care. Some trader smarter than me will catch it and "save" Bitcoin without even meaning to. The decentral bankers of Bitcoin: The bad ones pay the good ones and the good ones reduce volatility. Clearly we need more good ones and that's what I'm learning to be.


OK... GOOD bye....

 Maybe you will buy back in at $700?  Losing out may come when a guy get's too greedy...

Losing out at cheap coins may come when you are impatient. The only thing I think I'm missing out on now is the opportunity to punish the optimistic. From an ROI perspective, it doesn't matter how many coins you buy or at what price. It only matters that you get the direction of price travel right and the amount of movement.

Run along, now. Daddy's got work to do.

I was fairly impressed with the seeming self-restraint of your post, until I arrived at the last line. 

You could NOT resist, and for some strange reasons (possibly only known to yourself - although you may NOT be able to control yourself), you had to throw in some patronizing comment. 

A Funny comment for highschool aged socializing, but does NOT seem to be a comment among mature and/or properly groomed adults.

Lighten up, Man. You gotta know I do it to bug you. We're all learning here.



1317. Post 6166713 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

at least for a few minutes, that guy who dumped at $340's got to be feeling pretty stupid.



1318. Post 6166759 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Looks like Huobi's running out of steam.



1319. Post 6166882 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: TERA on April 11, 2014, 04:05:17 AM
Standing order net fills:



I decided not to tamper with it this time and cancel them all as it was falling like some times before.  Cheesy

The Green Lumber Trader FTW!!! 



1320. Post 6166984 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

First day trade stop loss on a margin short @ $368.  Only cost me $48 bucks. I hope I'm starting to get the hang of this. Got to know when to fold 'em.
It would be great if $340 holds on the retest. I'm sick of this bear market.



1321. Post 6167051 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: MinermanNC on April 11, 2014, 04:29:43 AM
I never thought 390 would look so good lol
I think the worst is behind us. BTC was tested and has won Smiley

Way too early to say. I hope so.



1322. Post 6167461 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: TERA on April 11, 2014, 05:21:49 AM
I'm happy we went this low though because obviously the bears filled up with cheap coins completely and will stop crying now for a long time. No more posts on why we will go down (confirmed) and other fud.
Bears happy, bulls happy. Everybody happy.

I am not happy as long as there is Chinese BS changing every day. I would be happiest if all Chinese exchanges were closed.

Uncertainty is what makes markets volatile. Volatility is what you profit from.



1323. Post 6167520 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

What a day! I'll take my modest profit and go to sleep. Very educational.



1324. Post 6173181 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: magicmexican on April 11, 2014, 12:50:58 PM
Hey guys, what is the reason for the ongoing bitcoin price decline?

rumors of Gox coming back

And now the rumors of China coming back.



1325. Post 6173939 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: BitChick on April 11, 2014, 02:39:56 PM
Hey guys, what is the reason for the ongoing bitcoin price decline?

rumors of Gox coming back

And now the rumors of China coming back.

Which is perfect for launching a new Bitcoin bubble when the dust settles!  Grin

It's reasonable to consider ~$400-450 the possible base with the possibility of more dips down close to $340 to test the low. That's ~4X the base for last year, consistent with the exponential four year trend. What's important to factor in is the dust hasn't settled yet. It will never settle completely, which is how day traders make money. Uncertainty.

Lat night was epic. Significant anecdotal evidence of a bottom was me closing my margin short position ~350 even though I was almost certain it was going lower and TERA letting her buy orders stand when she sometimes pulls them.  Maximum fear for me and detached indifference from the liquidity providers. That tells me she's made so much money from shorting, she didn't even care if she lost a little with a continued crash to $266 support.

If $340 is tested again on high volume and holds, I'll start sleeping in BTC instead of fiat. It's too early to say if this wicked correction is over, but many margin longs got wiped out (which needed to happen) and many weak hands got shaken out. The economy can only grow sustainably when capital is in the hands of competent people.



1326. Post 6174771 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

I just had what I think is an epiphy: Our jobs as day traders, the liquidity providers, the decentral bankers of bitcoin, it to find a hole in the order book and fill it. Most of the money the good ones are going to make is when they aren't even looking.




1327. Post 6175824 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Who here has money in case there is a weekend dip or a retest of $340?? BTC may go to the moon from here and if so, awesome. I'll cash out my trading stash and reload from cold storage. But what if there's another dump? You have to be flexible in case the unexpected happens.

If you want to make money day trading and help the Bitcoin economy at the same time, you don't buy at the top of a 20% rally.  Missing the train isn't any more of a risk at this point than missing the next dump.  I usually consider Friday to be "idiot with a paycheck day" and do the opposite of what everybody else is doing. I'm looking for an opportunity to partially buy back in and this certainly isn't it.

A push back from $340 is a very good long term sign, but that doesn't mean there isn't $4K coins in sell orders to get us back to where we were two days ago.




1328. Post 6177093 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: Guinpen on April 11, 2014, 07:09:43 PM
420 being tested again on Stamp... when will it end?!

When you sell me your coins for less than you paid for them.



1329. Post 6177158 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on April 11, 2014, 07:13:48 PM
420 being tested again on Stamp... when will it end?!

I don't think we are in a hurry back to 340$.


I really hope we are. A retest of $340 on higher volume and I'm back in 100% crypto. A slow painful grind back to $340 and then I have to wait until we continue to grind down to $267.



1330. Post 6177280 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: Guinpen on April 11, 2014, 07:56:34 PM
WTF is happening, why are we plunging again?

This isn't a plunge. This is boring. What, you thought the market would just automatically go up forever from the exact moment you bought?



1331. Post 6177509 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: serenitys on April 11, 2014, 08:13:28 PM
WTF is happening, why are we plunging again?

This isn't a plunge. This is boring. What, you thought the market would just automatically go up forever from the exact moment you bought?

Why yes, yes we did  Grin

Gonna look forward to taking your coins off of you. The best way to make money is to have money and patience. Day trading isn't luck. It's a job. You are the liquidity provider for the market. You provide dollar liquidity when it's needed and BTC liquidity when it's needed. The way you can tell if you are doing your job well is by selling at a profit. We make a lot of bets and most of them lose. The few that win pay off big.  Cutting your losses is an essential part of the job.

It will likely cost you a lot of money before you get the hang of it. It's kind of like being a poker pro except you actually provide something to society besides entertainment. I'm still learning. Bitcoin's historical volatility shows that we really need good traders. Good traders help reduce volatility. They eat it. Guys like you just function to pay off the good ones.

You don't have to believe in Bitcoin to be a good trader. In fact, it's often a liability. We tend to project our desires onto the market. You need to understand order flows.



1332. Post 6178339 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: TERA on April 11, 2014, 09:24:38 PM
that is one bullish set of daily candles. Where are the train pics?

LOL. We're not buying your $350 coins for $417. I'm pretty sure you dumped them already anyway.



1333. Post 6178797 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 11, 2014, 09:32:28 PM
420 being tested again on Stamp... when will it end?!

I don't think we are in a hurry back to 340$.


I really hope we are. A retest of $340 on higher volume and I'm back in 100% crypto. A slow painful grind back to $340 and then I have to wait until we continue to grind down to $267.

Yest, that is a question that I am considering too.  However, I would think the opposite reaction would be most logical.  If price moves down quickly to $340, then you wait for $267 or whatever.  If price moves down slowly to $340, then you may consider that a true bottom is met, and you would get into all crypto at that point. 

So, I appreciate your framing of the possible outcomes, yet I question your characterization about what you would do under either scenario...  It is like you know better, but you are providing stupid ass and illogical information.. NOT hating on you, just a little irritated by your message b/c it seems to be giving weird-ass conclusions based on a hypothetical that could really happen.  Since, on more than one occasion, you have asserted NOT to be purposefully deceiving anyone, maybe you can clarify what you meant?

I closed my margin short@ $350 last night and made some money, but not nearly as much as I would have made had I bought. I'm sitting in 100% crypto and you can't do anything with fiat on an exchange except withdraw it or buy BTC. I WANT to buy BTC @ $350 so does every other well-funded trader who missed the opportunity to sell the bounce. The ones who did sell the bounce made a bundle and want to do it again. This has been a vicious four month bear market and the people who still have fiat have it because we don't part with it easily. The unknown question is how many of us want to buy relative to how many will want to sell when all the candles are red and it looks like $340 is just a pit stop on the road to Hell.

I don't want the price to go to $266 even though I'd get a lot more coins because I know also that it would push the next ATH back probably until next year. I'll deal with it if it happens, cuz y'know I would have to, but it wouldn't be much fun. Even the most successful traders do not control the market because they do not control demand. All they do is supply liquidity.  The differing ways to get there again will give evidence of how much demand there is.

The market could be in a lot worse shape than it is. I'm sure the whales who saw how fast liquidity can dry up last night are swimming a little less deep in the order book now.

I don't know how much demand there is for bitcoins, but I have an edge if I focus like a laser on certain signals. Good day traders don't do what is logical. They supply the liquidity to the people who are logical and to everybody else. If the market doesn't retest $340-$350, then I don't think I am in a position to provide much liquidity to the market. I'll prolly just cash out, pay some bills and wait out the next ATH to pull some coins from cold storage and do it again.

Stable prices are good if they are stable on high volume, but volume has dried up again, which means the only price discovery tool I have now is patience.
What happens on low volume means little. What happens on high volume says more.



1334. Post 6178895 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: roslinpl on April 11, 2014, 10:44:04 PM
Price looks like is not sure where to go Smiley up or down ... I see it is more likely to go up in next 12h I predict +33$

The sentiment on this thread is interesting. The people who bought into the rally today seem upset that the price didn't go up more when if they were capable of sustaining a rally they would be happy the price is going down so they could accumulate more coins.  I don't yet see any signs of new capital infusion.  Such low volume on a Friday night seems to indicate we're going to have a week end dip.



1335. Post 6179308 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 11, 2014, 11:13:07 PM
The sentiment on this thread is interesting. The people who bought into the rally today seem upset that the price didn't go up more when if they were capable of sustaining a rally they would be happy the price is going down so they could accumulate more coins.  I don't yet see any signs of new capital infusion.  Such low volume on a Friday night seems to indicate we're going to have a week end dip.

Im pretty happy with a $100 rally tbh. +1 about the weekend dip, but there is nothing (yet) to drive it to lows or even close. maybe $30-40. I wouldn't be surprised if we rally some more either. the china unban 'news' hits the spot. it's the first scrap of pro bitcoin we have heard from PBOC. should calm some nerves.

The bearish case about China is that with the Middle Kingdom still in play, the uncertainty weighs on the market. Silk road closed and we had a monster rally. Gox closed and we shot up from $400 to $710. Uncertainty was removed. China is still alive and kicking, which means that the money allocated for investing after the China crash may never enter the market.



1336. Post 6180118 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: TERA on April 12, 2014, 12:26:54 AM
that is one bullish set of daily candles. Where are the train pics?

LOL. We're not buying your $350 coins for $417. I'm pretty sure you dumped them already anyway.
It does not matter if the statement is bullish or bearish - I cannot point out objective statements about TA and charts without having my own position questioned. Why is that?

You're right. I apologize. A good prediction, too!   Thanks for the tip. Green Lumber Trader is on a roll!!!



1337. Post 6181067 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

NICE! I bought back all the coins I sold on the way down and a few more. Still have fiat left in my account!  Damn, those coins are getting scarce. When the chart tells you to buy, you buy. 



1338. Post 6182019 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: TERA on April 12, 2014, 04:30:47 AM
I'm not confident in this being the final bottom for the same reason as last time. The stoch RSI is wrong, again. The reversal is being triggered by some piece of information and a panic at the wrong point in the trend with no evidence of a true capitulation having occured. In a real reversal, everyone is bearish and someone is there sneakily buying up all the coins that the bears are dumping despite all odds, and the price slowly scoops it way upwards with the MACD crossing as the stoch RSI is still low. It usually features a sort of double bottom a couple days apart with both days having high volume.

That's an important cautionary note. I was thinking this looked a lot like the Gox recovery.  We'll just have to wait and see how this plays out.



1339. Post 6182751 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

This is interesting. Are we going to see a retest of $340??  I've got fiat waiting.



1340. Post 6183685 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: spooderman on April 12, 2014, 09:22:51 AM
I feel it is very risky to short now. I bought in the 300s and feel if I short now best case scenario is I buy back at 390-400. Because dinosaur.

It'll break up, break down, or slog. I least want it to slog so it will slog.



1341. Post 6186703 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: TERA on April 12, 2014, 10:09:32 AM
If it's not obvious which direction to trade, don't trade. These consolidations are here to give you a break.

That's the problem. It's not obvious, but are you going to sleep in fiat or BTC? I think it's going down, but I don't want to miss the opportunity to lock in my BTC profits. I have enough cash to buy lower if and probably when that happens. AT LEAST one more test of support is very likely, IMHO. It may even go down to $266 support or lower. This is Bitcoin.

You're very good at what you do, Tera, but none of us is omniscient. I can't follow your advice on when to sell if I don't have any to trade.



1342. Post 6187238 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: seleme on April 12, 2014, 03:35:10 PM
If it's not obvious which direction to trade, don't trade. These consolidations are here to give you a break.

That's the problem. It's not obvious, but are you going to sleep in fiat or BTC? I think it's going down, but I don't want to miss the opportunity to lock in my BTC profits. I have enough cash to buy lower if and probably when that happens. AT LEAST one more test of support is very likely, IMHO. It may even go down to $266 support or lower. This is Bitcoin.

You're very good at what you do, Tera, but none of us is omniscient. I can't follow your advice on when to sell if I don't have any to trade.

TERA is trader, and when trader says to not trade that means stay in fiat in bearish markets, btc in bullish markets.

I remember telling a friend of mine in 2011 when BTC was $3: "" I don't know if it'll go up or down, but I guarantee you'll only be 1/3 the idiot I was when I bought @ $9.

I guess I'm resigned to loose some money.  More tuition.  Every surprise can't be to the down side.




1343. Post 6189133 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Coinbase is running a little bit higher than Bitfinex and Stamp. This is where American miners usually cash out, so this is an indication that miners aren't selling. Americans are buying. Slowly, patiently.

It could easily go lower than here. A lot lower, but I'm psychologically changed. I'm getting greedy for cheap coins. It could stay low for months or years. Good. More time to buy cheap coins.

Is this anecdotal evidence of a change in market sentiment or just me? Dunno.  Let's find out.




1344. Post 6189307 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: Zule on April 12, 2014, 07:02:14 PM
Coinbase is running a little bit higher than Bitfinex and Stamp. This is where American miners usually cash out, so this is an indication that miners aren't selling. Americans are buying. Slowly, patiently.

It could easily go lower than here. A lot lower, but I'm psychologically changed. I'm getting greedy for cheap coins. It could stay low for months or years. Good. More time to buy cheap coins.

Is this anecdotal evidence of a change in market sentiment or just me? Dunno.  Let's find out.


Whole thing based on a "murican miners sell on Coinbase", any evidence to that?

Coinbase is the easiest, safest way to get fiat in and out of Bitcoin in America. Our wallets are linked to our bank accounts.  I found out about it from this forum last year when price was running BELOW Gox and stamp. I asked why and a few miners told me.




1345. Post 6189501 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: BitAddict on April 12, 2014, 07:20:07 PM
Back down to super low volume. Are we thinking consolidation and up or are we just waiting for the next bit of news.

450 used to be the norm. Before that it was 620, and before that it was 800.
If 425 becomes the new normal flat line on low volume, which is lower than the previous one, it just means that at last dip, once more and again, more fiat got out than new fiat came in.

Apathy sucks. Let's hope that volume picks up on Monday.

Also every day there are 3,600 new freshly mined bitcoins, and part of them are sold to pay electricity bills, try to recover money invested on the miner, investing on more mining power or present/future panickers.

That means it is needed up to $1.5 million daily deposits to maintain the price stable. (Actually less because some will hold no matter what, so you can guess something like 25%-50% of $1.5 million)

Blockchain.info and Coinbase each have over a million wallets. $1.5 million is less than a dollar average per wallet. See, that's the problem bears have. There is a point where supporting a price level becomes trivial for Bitcoin enthusiasts. We don't know what that level is, but it's somewhere.



1346. Post 6189777 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: gizmoh on April 12, 2014, 07:52:46 PM
Most obvious prediction is down to 2500 on huobi

Bears are washed out, the current selling is mainly profit taking.
We aren't going below 400 unless fresh Fud news from china comes in.


The idiots are washed out. The people who sold low and bought high. Smart bulls and bears BOTH made money



1347. Post 6190023 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: magicmexican on April 12, 2014, 08:05:09 PM
1min on huobi is scary

On that volume? Almost meaningless. Many if not post panic sellers sold in the crash to $340. When and if The China Syndrome plays out, we know the likely support is $340. Big players aren't selling right now. They're holding and looking for an opportunity to buy more.  A second test pf $340 on high volume is a double bottom and an end to the bear market.

Some people define a bull or bear market as a change of more than 20%. In that case, we're already in a bull market. 



1348. Post 6190333 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: jonoiv on April 12, 2014, 08:33:49 PM
Most obvious prediction is down to 2500 on huobi

Bears are washed out, the current selling is mainly profit taking.
We aren't going below 400 unless fresh Fud news from china comes in.


The bulls seem more washed out to me, I don't see many people buying at the moment.

some people are worried of being a 450 bag holder.  


I am more worried about the bag being on the train, while I am standing at the railway station platform trying to figure out how to get to the next train station so I can get on the train.

And there are plenty of people like you that feel the same.  

I think when we finally hit the bottom we will level out for a while.  I don't see a big bounce, followed by choo choo.  So for me at least there is a lot less risk in dollars or yuan.

All the gox, China, Australia news, does not go away overnight, and it's new investors that are needed. More bad news could be just around the corner.  Many personal investors with serious cash are older, and don't understand bitcoin, and are naturally more conservative.  Corporations, wouldn't touch bitcoin with a shitty stick right now, as it looks risky on price and it looks even riskier on regulation.  Lets face it, there is no good news for new investment.


 LOL. Can I quote you on that? What's App sold for $19 Billion dollars.  You don't think there aren't one or two VCs considering the possibility of cornering the market for the next rally? NONE??  10% of CoinBase and Blockain wallets holders could support this price level for less than $10 a day. By themselves. I have thousands of dollars waiting for bear suckers to dump so that I can take your coins. I'm pretty sure we can come up with money to buy longer than you can come up with coins to sell. The Fed is quantitatively easing ~ $50 Billion/month.

Maybe I'm wrong. We'll see.



1349. Post 6190890 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: kurious on April 12, 2014, 09:43:05 PM
Most obvious prediction is down to 2500 on huobi

Bears are washed out, the current selling is mainly profit taking.
We aren't going below 400 unless fresh Fud news from china comes in.


The bulls seem more washed out to me, I don't see many people buying at the moment.

some people are worried of being a 450 bag holder.  


I am more worried about the bag being on the train, while I am standing at the railway station platform trying to figure out how to get to the next train station so I can get on the train.

And there are plenty of people like you that feel the same.  

I think when we finally hit the bottom we will level out for a while.  I don't see a big bounce, followed by choo choo.  So for me at least there is a lot less risk in dollars or yuan.

All the gox, China, Australia news, does not go away overnight, and it's new investors that are needed. More bad news could be just around the corner.  Many personal investors with serious cash are older, and don't understand bitcoin, and are naturally more conservative.  Corporations, wouldn't touch bitcoin with a shitty stick right now, as it looks risky on price and it looks even riskier on regulation.  Lets face it, there is no good news for new investment.


 LOL. Can I quote you on that? What's App sold for $19 Billion dollars.  You don't think there aren't one or two VCs considering the possibility of cornering the market for the next rally? NONE??  10% of CoinBase and Blockain wallets holders could support this price level for less than $10 a day. By themselves. I have thousands of dollars waiting for bear suckers to dump so that I can take your coins. I'm pretty sure we can come up with money to buy longer than you can come up with coins to sell. The Fed is quantitatively easing ~ $50 Billion/month.

Maybe I'm wrong. We'll see.

Sounds to me you are gradually coming out of bear-mode, BJA.

If so - welcome back.

We have seen the lows, and it is a pitifully small drop from where we are to what are VERY cheap coins. Too cheap.

Yes - buy like a mofo if it dips again, it may be the last chance...  I increased my (not massive) holdings by 25% on Thursday in that dip and I am quietly rather pleased with myself.

There is not much that can take us down from here, and the upside has a hell of a lot more room in it.

If you feel different - you are right to:  If it was going to crash, the bears had their chance to drive it to 266 and maybe lower 48 hours ago.  There is not much fiat coming in, so we should be seeing carnage if Thursday was not the bottom.

But it didn't happen.  And it won't.  China has been priced in for weeks, Gox is gone.   All the other (ignored) news is actually very positive - more so than ever.  But most importantly the market thinks that 339 is too cheap.

It is being 'remembered' that coins are scarce and they are very cheap, in my humble opinion.  Sub 400 is a steal compared to what we we will see this summer.

Even under 450 is a safe buy compared to what is to come.

Like KFR said - people treat a day like it's a month on here, it's hilarious.  Sentiment sea changes have already come, don't short - BUY.

Yeah, I snuck back in at $417 when nobody was looking.  Grin



1350. Post 6191075 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: dreamspark on April 12, 2014, 10:16:47 PM
Im more optimistic but Im waiting until the exchanges actually lose their bank accounts and the 15th-18th passes nothings really changed in the last few days other than breaking the previous lows. This could easily be retested on any China FUD

I agree a retest of the lows is very possible, but we are approaching a cross on the 4HR moving average chart, and I didn't want to miss the possibility of a pop.



1351. Post 6191218 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

I'm seeing some significant changes in the order books.  Looking very bullish. Still wary of crazy dumps out of the blue. Damn China.



1352. Post 6192209 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

BTC-e on the pump.

{edit} it's the Death Bot!



1353. Post 6200477 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

How awesome it would be if this was a successful retest of $340. 



1354. Post 6200934 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 13, 2014, 04:53:55 PM
How awesome it would be if this was a successful retest of $340. 

I thought that you said that you were back to being all in BTC?  Did you get into Fiat again at some time?

I specifically said I was NOT all in, just cautiously optimistic. There was a four hour cross on the MACD  that had the potential of causing a pop, and I wanted to be in a position to SELL that spike. The Next rally is extremely unlikely to start immediately after the lowest point is hit. There will be months of consolidation.



1355. Post 6201722 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 13, 2014, 05:21:58 PM
$750 valuation based on what?

Numerous fundamental factors and several technicals converge in this area presently.  You need to do some catchup reading.  The  bear case always boils down to fud - which is a legitimate and important factor.  The bull case always boils down to facts and logic - sometimes erroneous but on the whole fairly sound ( although exhaustive scenario analysis is of course infeasible or even impossible).  It is just possible that facts and logic will dominate in the long run. Not certain, but the upside is huge if they do.

The bear case is sustained by FUD, but it is not comprised of FUD. The bear case is that there are significant holders of large amounts of BTC with the ability to crash the market should any one of a number of things happen. They think the probability of at least one of these things happening is greater than the probability that hidden capital is going to launch a rally.

Bears also simply think that the flow of capital into BTC is going to be less than the flow out for a given amount of time. Miners would be buying their asses of right now if they had the capital to do so, because they know the price is substantially below the cost of production. So why aren't they? Coinbase price is only $2 higher than Bitstamp.

A bounce off of expected $400 support was on very low volume. We are always at the mercy of people who know more than we do.

Death Bot is on Huobi NOW! 



1356. Post 6202023 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Whoever is operating the Death Bot is paying a lot of money to buy high and sell low. Why? One possible reason is to test market price and order resiliency. This person likely has a massive amount of cash and coins to control and the Death Bot is merely an operating expense.

This is very different than Willy. It's shown up on multiple exchanges, so it's probably not an exchange operator. That's a good sign, but it means the market is getting more sophisticated. Smart people are taking money from dumb people and I'm getting the sinking feeling that I'm one of the dumb people.

I don't have enough information to trade, so I'm not going to.




1357. Post 6202862 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: magicmexican on April 13, 2014, 06:54:13 PM
Whoever is operating the Death Bot is paying a lot of money to buy high and sell low. Why? One possible reason is to test market price and order resiliency. This person likely has a massive amount of cash and coins to control and the Death Bot is merely an operating expense.

This is very different than Willy. It's shown up on multiple exchanges, so it's probably not an exchange operator. That's a good sign, but it means the market is getting more sophisticated. Smart people are taking money from dumb people and I'm getting the sinking feeling that I'm one of the dumb people.

I don't have enough information to trade, so I'm not going to.



What methods did you use to identify him?

Chart patterns.



1358. Post 6205363 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: chromosoma on April 13, 2014, 10:42:11 PM
can someone please explain  what is the purpose of this bot? He seems to appear every day or so.

I already did. Read back two pages.



1359. Post 6205771 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

This is really suspicious. Somebody pulled a ton of orders so the priced shot down and then that possibly that same person scooped up the coins. The question is for what purpose? To hold onto them or to dump them again soon?



1360. Post 6206801 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 14, 2014, 01:26:58 AM
I just noticed that on Apr/09 some "nice person" edited my entry in Wikipedia, adding the statement that I am an enthusiastic bitcoin investor and owner of one of  the 500  largest bitcoin fortunes.  (The anonymous "nice person" who did it used the IP 145.101.24.158, which is registered to "Openbare Bibliotheek Amsterdam, Keizersgracht 440, Nl-1016 Gd, The Netherlands".)  Angry

Apart from the attempt to harm me personally, I deeply resent the vandalization of Wikipedia for such purposes.  But I should not be surprised. Unfortunately the bitcoin "ecosystem", from the "patriarchs" and "whales" down to the drooling daytraders, seems to be heavily infested by people who are capable of much worse things.

Which is another reason why I am extremely skeptical about the success of bitcoin.  Why would the world agree to cede control of the global internet currency to such "adorable" people, and let them steal a large slice of its wealth?  Tongue

That's hilarious! Lighten up, Prof. Wikipedia can be corrected easily. Some people just can't seem to take a joke.



1361. Post 6207436 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 14, 2014, 02:47:08 AM
I once left my motorcycle outside downtown with the ignition hotwired.  It wasnt there when I came back.  I don't blame the city. I don't defame it or consider its people more or less criminal than those of other cities.
Come on, it was not that petty vandalism of Wikipedia that gave me that negative view of the bitcoin "ecosystem".  It is the bulk of what I have read over these four months, especially the hype coming from the "great names". 

Bitcoin was crippled by two great disasters: first, its adoption by "libertarians", and, second, the blooming of the Chinese market.  These developments turned what could have been a great e-commerce invention into the instrument of a legion of skimmers, scammers, and common criminals.  Will the "pure" bitcoiners (if there are any left) have the will and power to get rid of those parasites, before they kill the idea?  I don't see that happening.

So let me get this straight: Bitcoin was crippled by smart people spotting the value of it before you? Libertarians and Chinese have average I.Q.s substantially higher than Latin Americans, Buddy. It doesn't mean we always use those brains wisely and we may be naive to think others generally play fair, but that's projection. It's because we do play fair. My money is at the risk of the market and yours is guarded by Statist thugs. You have no problem with government jackboots as long as they are under your control. It's not the Chinese involvement that's crippling Bitcoin right now. It's the PBoC's involvement. 

Everyone knows Sao Paulo is a shithole.  Coming from your perspective, You may think the whole world is a shithole too. It's not. We will absorb the Chinese dump if it happens at some price level. I don't know what that level is and I don't have to. It will likely take months or years to consolidate before the next rally and that's fine too.

Howz the Real doing, Prof? Ya got great confidence in your national currency? I read the story about how it was created. I couldn't believe Brazilians were that stupid. Then I started reading your posts. You rail against private sector scammers and ignore the greatest scammers of all: The governments of the world. Then you say "Yes, the government has problems, but it would be so much better if only people like me were in charge."  That would be a disaster. I'm comforted by the fact that the sociopaths who run the governments would never let that happen. 

You don't know shit about economics. You don't even think there is anything to know. You're not even coherent enough to be wrong. Incentives work. Can you get that into your thick bald head? This will blow over. It's going to suck in the meantime, but at least I won't have to wait it out in a suburb of a giant slum that smells like a sewer.



1362. Post 6207891 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: octaft on April 14, 2014, 04:29:58 AM

So you'll ignore the 70% racism and IQ bullshit (IQ is ironically a very dumb way to measure intelligence) and pick out what you like, and use that to defend him? Oh, but you won't "address the snipped bits," because there is no way you could defend him on that.

The guy is a racist, sexist, raving lunatic. Nobody needs more stupid like that.

So which is it? Do Latin Americans not have lower I.Q.s on average or is the fact that they have lower I.Q.s irrelevant? You can't have it both ways. I said having brains and using them wisely are two entirely different things. And before you scream "Racism!" again, you should know that my daughter whom I love more than the whole world is half Mexican. That word is used to shut down discussion by people who claim to be objective.

Is it racist to say that groups in different environments develop different characteristics over time due to natural selection?




1363. Post 6207938 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

This looks to me like the $710 whale pattern all over again. If this train leaves without me, fine. I got coins in cold storage.



1364. Post 6208230 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: octaft on April 14, 2014, 05:08:17 AM
I actually find BJA pretty offensive.  Sometimes I jerk my knee a bit too.  But the truths he elucidates in the process - often defects of my own thought derived from cohort common knowledge - are well worth the nose holding required to keep tears out of my eyes long enough to see them.


He has his moments, when he's not bloviating and being generally boorish.

Quote
Only if they are deluded by political correctness.  But by then its probably too late, and the reflexive filters will render the subject incorrigible.  At a guess, I estimate that your anti-racism is one born in the ghettos of white privilege.  If so, you will likely see racism where your culture group has defined it to be acceptable to see racism, and will be completely blind to the patronizing racism that pervades said culture.  Why is racism even a dirty word?  Fear of other.  Fear is a mind killer.

And that (the confusion deriving from fear) brings us back on-topic of speculation.

Tsk, tsk. If anyone should be fearing anything, it should be you fearing that you've stuck your neck out too far in your assumptions. Completely baseless, and entirely incorrect. I grew up lower middle class and lived in mixed race neighborhoods of the city my entire life. I have about equal amounts of white friends and friends of other races, and what I've learned is that every race has smart people, stupid people, nice people cruel people. Ultimately, we're all human, just different pigments. I don't give a shit about political correctness, I don't have any white guilt, and I'm colorblind: I don't give other races a pass just because they are a different race. It would be hypocritical of me to treat other races differently, even in a way that is positive for them, when I berate others for doing that.

What I do care about is the implication that one race is better than another simply because they are that race, then using some bullshit like IQ and "oh your country sucks" to back it up. If you're going to make such a strong assertion, it'd better not be with those weak arguments.


Oh, for fuck's sake. I hate talking about stuff like this.  Why are basketball players disproportionally black? If I even suggest it's because maybe they have genetic characteristics that make them on average better suited to the sport, then that's racist. It must be a cultural thing, right? There's no genetic component to anything? Is it racist to notice genetic characteristics or is it racists to care if there are differing characteristics? Norwegian people aren't taller? To say that one race is better than another in some particular way is not saying that one race is better than another generally. There is no "generally". "Better" at what?
 

I'm offensive? How many of you have married outside your race? Brazil sucks because it's filled with Statists. California sucks because it's filled with Californians. Jorge is a pompus psudo-intellectual. I don't even like to think in terms of groups. Jorge does. I was just giving him a taste of his own medicine.




1365. Post 6208284 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: octaft on April 14, 2014, 05:15:35 AM

So you'll ignore the 70% racism and IQ bullshit (IQ is ironically a very dumb way to measure intelligence) and pick out what you like, and use that to defend him? Oh, but you won't "address the snipped bits," because there is no way you could defend him on that.

The guy is a racist, sexist, raving lunatic. Nobody needs more stupid like that.

So which is it? Do Latin Americans not have lower I.Q.s on average or is the fact that they have lower I.Q.s irrelevant? You can't have it both ways. I said having brains and using them wisely are two entirely different things. And before you scream "Racism!" again, you should know that my daughter whom I love more than the whole world is half Mexican. That word is used to shut down discussion by people who claim to be objective.

Is it racist to say that groups in different environments develop different characteristics over time due to natural selection?



Yes I can have it both ways. IQ is irrelevant to me because of the research I've done on it, but you are treating it as relevant so you can judge other races, so it's a dumb argument on two counts.

As for that "my daughter is half mexican" argument, that's not shutting down shit. It's just a variation on the classic "but I have black friends!" nonsense that racist people use to "prove" they're not racist.

Your last line is not at all racist. The easiest example is the closer to the equator you get, generally the darker the skin pigment gets. An adaptation to deal with differences in exposure to the sun. That has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence, though. Natural selection should tend to favor the more intelligent of the species, regardless of skin color, so natural selection will tend to make all races smarter over a long period of time.

So some environments couldn't disproportionally benefit the intelligent more than other environments? Never mind. Fuckin drop it, Dude. We're way off topic.



1366. Post 6208556 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: magicmexican on April 14, 2014, 06:15:01 AM
btc-e is actually higher than stamp, train could be leaving.

Dont really understand shorters, 2500-2550 on huobi was a fine range to close your shorts and play it safe, the probability of this kind of bounce was decently high.

It's 50 cents lower.



1367. Post 6208630 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: octaft on April 14, 2014, 06:23:02 AM

Explain how, or again, shut the fuck up.


Use your imagination, Bro. You can't imagine an environment where intelligence has a survival and replication advantage greater than another environment? Did you even go to high school?



1368. Post 6208764 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

looks like a short squeeze incoming. be ready to sell the pop.

Edit:  I sold. This is not organic. 



1369. Post 6208875 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: TERA on April 14, 2014, 07:00:35 AM
This breakout is weaksauce.

Everything is happening in proportion to the last breakout in March relative to volume.  It should be over when Stamp hits 30,000 volume.

Agreed. I just wish I had more coins to short it.



1370. Post 6208955 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: TERA on April 14, 2014, 07:10:24 AM
I'm not shorting right now  (I actually took long on the 425 retracement); I'm just not expecting much. I'd caution against shorting until some TA indicators actually go back down, just in case.

Good thought. I'm not margin short. I'm using my trading account as a hedge on my cold storage stash, so I'm actually long. I just sold some to lock in profits.



1371. Post 6209188 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: TERA on April 14, 2014, 07:38:33 AM
Listen to "mooncake" - he has your best interests at heart.

LOL. It's not easy to do sarcasm in type. You nailed it.



1372. Post 6209500 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: TERA on April 14, 2014, 07:52:44 AM
My new favorite chart:



This market will turn around eventually. I'm just not at all convinced that time is now, 24 hours before the Lights possibly go out in China.



1373. Post 6209768 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Guinpen on April 14, 2014, 08:03:08 AM
Dear bears,



Yours truly,
Everyone else


You're welcome. I bought most of them for less than $20. I have plenty more in cold storage. How dumb do you think we are?



1374. Post 6210236 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Guinpen on April 14, 2014, 08:56:45 AM
You're welcome. I bought most of them for less than $20. I have plenty more in cold storage. How dumb do you think we are?

I don't think you're dumb. I'm just celebrating the rise of BTC price, which is, last time I checked, a Good Thing (TM).

Could be a bull trap for all I know Smiley Show some sense of humor, man.


It is very likely a bull trap, or more specifically, a short squeeze attempt. There was a coordinated evaporation of buy orders this morning followed by a coordinated pump on all major exchanges. I'm a Bitcoin true believer as anyone who follows this thread knows, but these price movements aren't normal and wreak of pump and dump.  If it really is the train, there will be plenty of stops and I'll board then. 



1375. Post 6210315 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

People who successfully trade bear markets are essential to the health of the project. Capital has to flow into the hands of competent managers for sustainable growth to happen. Successful traders reduce volatility.



1376. Post 6210474 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Holy fuck. 



1377. Post 6212300 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

It looks to me like altcoin pump and dumpers have hit the main artery. Looks even more like the epic $710 trap than it did last night. Trade with extreme caution. Once the shorts get squeezed, there's likely to be a painful grind back down.  Long term investors beware.  Short term gamblers, pile on.  I'm not saying it's not going to work. I'm saying I don't think it is supported by fundamentals.

This is shark money pumping. These guys don't add to the project. They are looking for a fast buck.



1378. Post 6216267 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 14, 2014, 02:27:56 PM
There was a coordinated evaporation of buy orders this morning ...

Now you just sound paranoid.  Exactly how does one "coordinate" an evaporation of buy orders?


There was a gap in the chart. Prices didn't fall to $400. They levitated downward. Somebody put in a bunch of limit buy orders when there was low volume, waited until everybody was asleep and then pulled them. People saw them being pulled and adjusted there positions accordingly. People watching for a retest of $340 on China news sold and many put in leveraged short positions.

and suddenly this thread suddenly gets flooded with bullish stuff from new accounts.

They suckered in a bunch of shorts, and then put on the squeeze. Look at the one day chart. this rally looks like a mini-version of the rally to $710. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.






1379. Post 6217023 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

This is a very dangerous game. The levered shorts are hoping another China crash will come before they are force liquidated and the levered longs are counting on the shorts getting liquidated before the crash. Smart players like TERA are long but not levered, ready to pull the trigger and profit either way and I'm on the sidelines watching and learning.

The swap fees amount to somewhere around 60% annual interest. The pressure is building and is going to blow one way or the other.

The bear market didn't suddenly end because some exchange decided to invest in ATMs. China isn't suddenly irrelevant. A SUSTAINED reversal isn't something that happens this quickly with no big news. If it happens at all it happens slowly as utility value replaces speculative value.

The question every wise investor asks themselves is "Is time my friend or my enemy?" If time is your enemy, chances are you are on the wrong side of the trade.



1380. Post 6218058 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Looks like the Death Bot is possibly on Bitfinex now.

The most likely culprit for manipulating the price down now is the same person or people who manipulated it up in the first place.

Looking at the chart, it is apparent that the post Gox infusion of cash (i.e. the $710 whale money) was removed. ALL OF IT by March 26. and the downward trend continued as if nothing had happened. The people who pumped @ $400 are likely taking your money now.



1381. Post 6218497 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on April 14, 2014, 05:58:00 PM
This is a very dangerous game. The levered shorts are hoping another China crash will come before they are force liquidated and the levered longs are counting on the shorts getting liquidated before the crash. Smart players like TERA are long but not levered, ready to pull the trigger and profit either way and I'm on the sidelines watching and learning.

The swap fees amount to somewhere around 60% annual interest. The pressure is building and is going to blow one way or the other.

The bear market didn't suddenly end because some exchange decided to invest in ATMs. China isn't suddenly irrelevant. A SUSTAINED reversal isn't something that happens this quickly with no big news. If it happens at all it happens slowly as utility value replaces speculative value.

The question every wise investor asks themselves is "Is time my friend or my enemy?" If time is your enemy, chances are you are on the wrong side of the trade.

I'm inclined to agree with you, but there has been unexplained reversals in the past (or rather, you find out the news after the run-up, which seems more likely these days with institutional money). Nice volume today though, gonna be an exciting week it seems.

and the idea that there has been plenty of good news and progress buried in the fear of China's policy making methods

There has been plenty of good news and progress, but the fundamentals haven't changed overnight by 17%.  Fear of Gox closing dominated until it closed. Fear of China crashing will dominate until it crashes. If it doesn't crash, that fear will weigh on the market until some even bigger fear weighs on the market. Satoshi coins entering market, FBI coins, another exchange getting hacked or closing, regulatory doomsday, another prominent Bicoin personality getting arrested, or maybe someone just happens to find their four year old hard drive with hundreds of thousands of coins on it. 

Good news doesn't mean as much in a bear market. People are looking for an excuse to sell, not to buy. There are people with substantial holdings without enough cash to wait out an extended bear market. They are selling little amounts to get by, extending the bear market. Things have to get worse before they get better. Capital has to move from incompetent managers to competent managers. That's why it's called a "correction".



1382. Post 6219506 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: boumalo on April 14, 2014, 07:24:42 PM
This is a very dangerous game. The levered shorts are hoping another China crash will come before they are force liquidated and the levered longs are counting on the shorts getting liquidated before the crash. Smart players like TERA are long but not levered, ready to pull the trigger and profit either way and I'm on the sidelines watching and learning.

The swap fees amount to somewhere around 60% annual interest. The pressure is building and is going to blow one way or the other.

The bear market didn't suddenly end because some exchange decided to invest in ATMs. China isn't suddenly irrelevant. A SUSTAINED reversal isn't something that happens this quickly with no big news. If it happens at all it happens slowly as utility value replaces speculative value.

The question every wise investor asks themselves is "Is time my friend or my enemy?" If time is your enemy, chances are you are on the wrong side of the trade.

I'm inclined to agree with you, but there has been unexplained reversals in the past (or rather, you find out the news after the run-up, which seems more likely these days with institutional money). Nice volume today though, gonna be an exciting week it seems.


and the idea that there has been plenty of good news and progress buried in the fear of China's policy making methods

There has been plenty of good news and progress, but the fundamentals haven't changed overnight by 17%.  Fear of Gox closing dominated until it closed. Fear of China crashing will dominate until it crashes. If it doesn't crash, that fear will weigh on the market until some even bigger fear weighs on the market. Satoshi coins entering market, FBI coins, another exchange getting hacked or closing, regulatory doomsday, another prominent Bicoin personality getting arrested, or maybe someone just happens to find their four year old hard drive with hundreds of thousands of coins on it. 

Good news doesn't mean as much in a bear market. People are looking for an excuse to sell, not to buy. There are people with substantial holdings without enough cash to wait out an extended bear market. They are selling little amounts to get by, extending the bear market. Things have to get worse before they get better. Capital has to move from incompetent managers to competent managers. That's why it's called a "correction".


We are in a bear market because good news are disregard, it will be the other way around when we will resume the bull market

Odds are we will dip again soon, it is way more likely than the scenario where we are already coming back up but at some point we will come back up and it will be crazy

There is a lot of potential for a big negative event such as the mtgox shut down but there is at least as much potential for a big positive event and I feel that we can overcome most big negative events when positive events will have a positive effect long term; the potential is so huge, 450$/BTC feels like a steal to me

$450 should be a steal, but it's not. The investing public is fickle. Nothing succeeds like success and nothing fails like failure. There is no certainty, but investing based on "feelings" usually doesn't pay as well and investing based on asymmetric information (insider trading). If you have a well diversified portfolio of more than $100,000 dollars, now would be a good time to buy a little, but obviously not as good of a time as two days ago @ $340. The risk is that you might have to wait a long time for your bet to pay off.. How long can you afford to wait?

I think Big Money is buying bitcoin right now, but they are buying off exchange and they are buying below market from miners. Those coins are just as likely to get dumped on the exchange for a guaranteed profit as they are to be held if some new disaster strikes. Buying right now may be a good long term investment, but it's an extremely risky short term speculation.  What if the Overstock stockholders pressure the CEO to stop accepting bitcoin or something similar happens?

John Maynard Keynes was a flawed economist in my opinion, but he was one of the very few to actually make a fortune in the markets. He said "Markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent". Many people have been force liquidated already and it's quite possible many more will be in the future. Bitcoin is a fantastic asset, but it is not worth risking insolvency over. We need financially healthy enthusiasts to form the base for the next rally, not bug-eyed gamblers. 

I want bitcoin to go strait up from here, but I've been in this game for over three years and my experience tells my it's unlikely. Possible, but unlikely. TERA is an excellent trader who makes money in bull and bear markets. She understands order flows better than I do. When she says she thinks this probably isn't a final bottom, I believe her.

I used to play poker and I discovered that it's quite possible to make money in a game even if you know you aren't the best player. You just have to know who that player is and you have to stay out of his way. The one thing I know for sure in this market is that I'm not the best player. I may not even be a good player. I've learned a lot, but perhaps the most important thing I've learned is how little I know.

Being ignorant isn't dangerous. What is dangerous is being ignorant and unaware of your ignorance. People are likely going to be insolvent before this is over. Intellectually I know that it's ultimately a good thing and has to happen, but I'm not quite calloused enough to enjoy it. Maybe that's why I gave up poker.



1383. Post 6221875 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):



Yeah, that's about right.



1384. Post 6222099 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: MinermanNC on April 14, 2014, 11:39:39 PM


Yeah, that's about right.
You got it! lol that's great

The view from the noose is awesome.



1385. Post 6222779 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: boumalo on April 15, 2014, 12:41:48 AM
OK. just need to break 499 now before we are out of the wedge! then 510 is last major resistance, and maybe we will see the real short squeeze!

It goes up and then it stays really steady around a specific number, 460$ on bitstamp atm

I am betting on a bull trap, we may see one or two other dip before we get going this summer and in autumn

I fear the trap has already sprung. The last time this happened, it took from March 2 to March 26 for everyone the realize that the whale infusion of capital had completely left the market. Most of us were thinking the bottom was in. Me included.



1386. Post 6223061 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: byronbb on April 14, 2014, 11:38:46 PM

You can't kill the Bitcoin, but the Bitcoin can kill you if you are not in a position to wait out 4-14 months for the next rally. Those who bought higher are suffering from the sunken cost fallacy. Right now, bitcoins are only worth what a willing buyer and a willing seller agree on. That price is ~$465 dollars. rpiatila and the like are not more prescient  than anyone else. Neither am I. The only prediction poll that really matters is the market itself.

Bitcoin don't care. Bitcoin don't give a fuck. That works in both directions.




1387. Post 6223523 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 15, 2014, 02:14:16 AM

I think 270 is pretty hopeful tbh. what could possibly drive that?




1388. Post 6223692 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 15, 2014, 02:23:17 AM

I think 270 is pretty hopeful tbh. what could possibly drive that?



but this is what is driving the price up?

china is not going to ban bitcoin. rejoice! they are bitcoin friendly, and the chinese may buy bitcoins using cash, if not exchanges which seem pretty stubborn.

China doesn't have to ban Bitcoin to crash the market. They just have to remove more fiat than bitcoins. The market doesn't even have to crash. it could just grind down as supply of coins exceeds supply of new money. China could also fuel a recovery. unlikely but possible. The point is it's an unknown, a risk factor that weighs on the market.

There are other risk factors as well. Unless you have asymmetric information, now is the time to buy only if you want to hold for years.



1389. Post 6223785 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 15, 2014, 02:41:01 AM
As to "freedom to choose my research topics":

How can you justify to yourself to take money from the people at gunpoint to research bitcoin for hundreds of hours? How about researching wasteful spending by tenured professors?
Hint: I am a professor of computer science.   Guess where the idea of bitcoin came out of? 

And methinks that if I could prevent a few folks here losing their life savings to scammers, Brazilian or otherwise, that may already justify my salary.   Which may be more than I deserve, but is not exactly taken at gunpoint from them, 

Tax money is ultimately taken through threat of force. You can tap dance around that all you want, but it's the truth. Most private and public sector scammers really believe their own bull shit. Rationalizing the evil we do is part of the human condition.



1390. Post 6223886 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

ooh, dumps. who coulda saw that coming?



1391. Post 6224116 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 15, 2014, 03:30:54 AM
As to "freedom to choose my research topics":

How can you justify to yourself to take money from the people at gunpoint to research bitcoin for hundreds of hours? How about researching wasteful spending by tenured professors?
Hint: I am a professor of computer science.   Guess where the idea of bitcoin came out of?  

And methinks that if I could prevent a few folks here losing their life savings to scammers, Brazilian or otherwise, that may already justify my salary.   Which may be more than I deserve, but is not exactly taken at gunpoint from them,  

With Brazil's cpi at over 6% and food prices over 20% annual inflation because your government can't rob enough people fast enough, they have to print money to cover your salary. Maybe you should study how you can prevent ALL of your country's population to lose 6% of their wealth each year instead of a few people getting scammed.

NOT easy for an academic to criticize the ways of his own govt.  And to be fair, the problem with fiat is with most of the govts around the world and is NOT particular to Brazil.  Actually, a lot of countries in south america have been really screwed over the past 30 years by the IMF and forced into various kinds of cutting of social programs and specialization to serve the needs of the USA... however, several of the countries have stood up to those specialization pressures... and said screw paying back the loans through the IMF (I think Argentina is one of them) and have created more diversified and self-sustaining economies, which the USA considers a form of hostility.  Whatever the situation, there are a lot more injustices occurring through various forms of fiat manipulation rather than through bitcoin.


Nobody forced them to take out the loans in the first place. They screwed themselves over. "Those asshole lenders, they actually expect me to pay them back."  Gimme a break. These third world countries were begging for loans and agreed to conditions. Then they balked at honoring the conditions after they already agreed to them. The they begged to renegotiate the terms, got the new terms and balked at them too!  

I agree that the IMF crowd are glorified loan sharks, but if you borrow from loan sharks you should be prepared to suffer the consequences.

EDIT: and if you think Argentina's economy is self-sustaining, then you are delusional. It's a basket case.



1392. Post 6224168 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: TERA on April 15, 2014, 03:37:33 AM
Expect an unexpected candle.

That was the most predictable candle I've ever seen. You saw it coming too. I know you did. Scammers got money and now the defense of $340 support is weakened.

At what price did you get out?



1393. Post 6224223 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 15, 2014, 03:51:10 AM
we are talking about a $10 candle, but who saw the bull run coming yesterday? mwa. If you are expecting an unexpected candle, I think you might just get one  Wink

TERA saw the whole thing as it was unfolding. There is more than a $10 red candle coming. That was a pump and dump and those guys won't keep a single coin. They are just selling slowly to keep from price from tanking before they get all the way out.



1394. Post 6224439 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: solex on April 15, 2014, 04:05:56 AM
That was a pump and dump and those guys won't keep a single coin. They are just selling slowly to keep from price from tanking before they get all the way out.

You can't know that. It is a pure guess. The market is (was?) on a 4.5 month downtrend and thousands of people were watching to see a break in that medium-term trend. The rally may have been sparked by an opportunistic whale on Huobi, but it was enthusiastically joined by loads of people who are expecting Bitcoin to resume is normal multi-year trend. Maybe they are right, maybe they will be disappointed with another low to be plunged. It is the market deciding, not some grand conspiracy.

It's not a pure guess. It's an educated guess. When this happened in March, it took three weeks for the price to fall back because people like you and me thought exactly what you are saying now. I learned. Apparently you didn't. Look at the chart pattern and compare it to the pump to $710. Looks eerily similar, doesn't it?



1395. Post 6224490 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: TERA on April 15, 2014, 04:31:06 AM
I'm actually not 100% sure that bears are out of the woods yet.

Neither am I. There is still a lot of pressure on the margin shorts from $400. I'm just saying I'm not as good as you are at swimming with sharks, so I'm watching from the edge of the pool for now.



1396. Post 6229842 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: TERA on April 15, 2014, 07:51:06 AM
to pop some bubbles: 3320ish on huobi is the breakout point and would prove the breakout of bearish trend started last year - and thats quite a way to go

To this and similar thinking I would say: The large traders are not following these technical patterns, they are creating them.

This thread was started as Wall Observer - previously there were large single orders which formed "walls" in the depth chart. But they have always been erected by the market manipulators, because they are the only ones with that many coins (then BTC10-BTC20k, now even BTC2k is considered a wall).

From my experience I can tell that wall building can fake selling pressure, and force the price down by 15% followed by buyback. At least it did in May, 2013.

If I had 35,000 bitcoins, I could manipulate the market all I wanted, and make money doing so. Hint: it is only 0.3% of world's bitcoins and there are several people who have it, and who most probably operate in the markets.

Please do not consider that Bitcoin market is more free market than any market in the "free market" countries. They are all ruthlessly manipulated to achieve various aims, and the way for you to make a small annual gain in the number of your bitcoins (which actually increases your % of world's bitcoins, because of the low inflation) is to hold, sell high, and buy back low, and not fall on the trap that the "technicals" can forecast anything, because they are fabricated. And be content what you get, and not short.

+1
This works until the day when bitcoin finally fails or stops achieving new highs.

That would have to be due to a technological problem, not an economic one. The rate of growth may eventually slow to population growth levels, but from an economic perspective, it's like investing in land, only with no property taxes and less risk of government seizure if properly secured. The Mississippi land bubble is a good analogy. There was a price collapse that lasted many decades, but who wouldn't want to buy that land now at 18th century prices?

Even in the unlikely event that Bitcoin is replaced by some other dominant cryptocurrency, there will always be collectors, Computer science history buffs (yes, they do exist).
They are simply too rare to stay low for long.

Investors should be encouraged that people like me missed this last little price run-up. This is how coins get disseminated.  I realized I was ridiculously undiversified and not properly hedged, so I sold at exactly the wrong time. That's bad for me but good for the long term health of the project because those coins are now in the hands of people who manage capital better than I do.

Studying F.A. Hayek gives insight as to why busts are essential for the proper operation of the free market economy and why liquidity injections by central banks are so harmful in the long run. You can't have winners without losers and you can't have booms without busts. They are called "corrections" for a reason.



1397. Post 6229992 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 15, 2014, 12:18:20 PM
If I was speculating, I would sell now. It can go as low as 405, likely at least 460.

I agree that is very likely, but by no means certain. Price is still below the cost of production, so a properly diversified and well capitalized person seeking to accumulate a small position to hold for years may want to buy. Everybody else should sell, sell short or hold.

The March false recovery lasted three weeks. This is very likely also a false recovery as China has not been resolved or rendered irrelevant to my knowledge. But then again I am not speculating either (anymore). I am hedging.



1398. Post 6232163 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 15, 2014, 12:51:28 PM
You can't have winners without losers...

Only true in a zero-sum game.  More generally, you can't have competition without relative losers.

Correct. My money is still sitting in my trading account, so I am only a relative loser. Considering my initial buy-in price I am still doing rather well. Trading is not a zero sum game. Both parties feel they are better off or the trade would not take place.



1399. Post 6232316 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: TERA on April 15, 2014, 01:43:03 PM
I wonder why all the alts except LTC  (LTC/BTC) are rallying?

Because the $400 BTC pumpers have already pulled money out with a profit and are now pumping alts.  They will switch to litecoin as soon as they bank a profit where they are at. People are chasing them around in circles.



1400. Post 6235249 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on April 15, 2014, 05:56:52 PM

That's probably your breath, instead of coins... you're smelling. It's coming from your mouth just below your nose.

Fonsie?  Oh really? Is the cloning never going to end?

I have to admit, were I a troll, I'd be deeply honoured of having trolls distorting my username in order to troll me back.
Bit like a B-movie gone so popular that it has its own pisstake B-movie.

imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.



1401. Post 6236629 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: fonsie on April 15, 2014, 06:26:17 PM

That's probably your breath, instead of coins... you're smelling. It's coming from your mouth just below your nose.

Fonsie?  Oh really? Is the cloning never going to end?

I have to admit, were I a troll, I'd be deeply honoured of having trolls distorting my username in order to troll me back.
Bit like a B-movie gone so popular that it has its own pisstake B-movie.

imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Perhaps it's a wise idea to either stop talking or go back to school, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imitation

Nobody's imitating fonzie...

Blowing up smoke his ass, isn't going to help either.

I'm not feeding Fonzie's ego. You are. I've had him on "ignore" for months.



1402. Post 6236797 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 15, 2014, 08:02:54 PM
To rationally decide to not buy a lot of bitcoins, you have to explain why it is impossible for Bitcoin to replace fiat (as a store of value, at least).
No you don't, you just need to explain why it is very unlikely. Just because something is possible doesn't mean it is probable. And I can think of a whole raft of reasons why it is improbable

Sorry if this point seems patronizing or insulting, but you need to be aware, in case you are not, of the concept of expected value.   A very large reward at very low probability may have much higher expected value than a modest reward at high probability.  Because the reward for owning bitcoin is so vast, in the fiat displacement case (which I agree is inevitable, albeit perhaps not with bitcoin as we know it today) even at vanishingly small probability it is a "rational" choice.  The concept of rationality is debatable.  But given the standard concept of rationality, the outcome is not really debatable.


That's true provided this is a manageable part of an investment portfolio. It's not entirely unlike drawing to an outside strait or four cards to a flush in poker. You have a ~37% chance of tripling your money or more in a three way pot. I take that bet every time IF I have a bankroll big enough to handle the expected ~63% of hands it loses.

A more extreme example is a lottery ticket. If a lottery ticket costs two dollars, with a chance of winning of One in a Million with a payout of of $1M, then the expected return of any given lottery ticket is 50 cents. A terrible bet.  But if that same lottery ticket with the same odds and the same payout cost 25 cents, it's a good deal, even if the chance of winning is extremely small. Just don't put a large percentage of your portfolio in lottery tickets.



1403. Post 6237103 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: phatsphere on April 15, 2014, 08:12:35 PM
To rationally decide to not buy a lot of bitcoins, you have to explain why it is impossible for Bitcoin to replace fiat (as a store of value, at least). Because I think it is almost inevitable, just like all the other new technologies that just were better than the previous way of doing things.
you are right, one aspect nevertheless: there could be a successor to bitcoin in its current form ... then it's clear that everyone will jump ship. i think, quite a few of those who have "missed" bitcoin so far think, that they'll simply wait for this new incarnation and hold back their investment.

That's the old "early bird gets the worm, but the second rat gets the cheese" argument. There is merit to that argument, but as long as the successor incorporates the Bitcoin block chain, it will not replace bitcoin. It will become Bitcoin. Green backs did not replace dollars after the U.S. War of Northern Aggression. Greenbacks became dollars.

If you missed the land boom, I suppose you could always wait for the real estate market on the moon, but that wouldn't make terrestrial holdings worthless.



1404. Post 6237429 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 15, 2014, 08:30:59 PM

Anyone who thinks that Bitcoin has anything higher than 0.1% chance of success, should rationally buy bitcoins. The trick is that buying increases the chance of success. With a few iterations you realize that the chance of success is actually something between 25% and 75%. Then you are very willing to buy bitcoins. Which increases the price, rewards previous investors, gets more people interested, and makes the chance go up. In 3-5 years we have everybody using bitcoins, and an ordinary person has 5mBTC in the west and 1mBTC in BRIC.

Why was the adoption of a new technology with network effects never before so interesting?

Because money is the ultimate network effect. By definition, money is the most marketable commodity. In other words, the most liquid commodity is de facto money.




1405. Post 6238079 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on April 15, 2014, 09:22:48 PM
Bitcoin will not be a ponzi if, and only if, it succeeds

Don't be an idiot. Bitcoin is not a ponzi.

Ok, now I have to be that guy.

Actually bitcoin does have at least two qualities of a ponzi scheme:
1. Early investors who gradually change back to fiat are basically earning money off the last round of investors.
2. Investors heavily advertise it because they know that the more new investors join, the more they gain.

I am not denying the absolutely awesome technological wonder that bitcoin is, and the fact that I can use it to move money across countries in a breeze (operation otherwise made unnecessarily painful by the sucking bastard governments and banks involved)
Still let's admit that we are in the speculation forum watching markets because we hope to get rich, and bitcoin keeps us hooked because of 1. and 2. above.


True, but Bitcoin lacks the critical component of a ponzi scheme: deceit. Ponzi victims are intentionally mislead as the the source of their dividends and or profits. Bitcoin is radically transparent. Open Source. Public bockchain.

We are betting on expected future utility value, not future speculative value.



1406. Post 6238467 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: hd060053 on April 15, 2014, 10:08:23 PM
buying pressure too high right now !

BTC can be moved to exchanges easier than can fiat. The situation can change rapidly.



1407. Post 6238679 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

The volume of this pump is very similar to March 3. The difference is that it is spread over two days instead of one. I won't trust this as a true recovery unless there is a successful retest of $340 support on higher volume. Every dollar spent on the exchange is a dollar not used to put a floor on the price in the event of another stampede for the exits.

You kids run and play. I guess it falls to me to be the responsible adult in the room. A roll I am unused to. Hopefully I will not be needed.



1408. Post 6239277 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on April 15, 2014, 11:04:12 PM
The volume of this pump is very similar to March 3. The difference is that it is spread over two days instead of one. I won't trust this as a true recovery unless there is a successful retest of $340 support on higher volume. Every dollar spent on the exchange is a dollar not used to put a floor on the price in the event of another stampede for the exits.

You kids run and play. I guess it falls to me to be the responsible adult in the room. A roll I am unused to. Hopefully I will not be needed.
fine words, sir.

I disagree. The pump of March 3 was one single player with a few millions. This one is a lot of tiny little buys on Chinese markets that keep on pressing from the bottom up, inspiring confidence in the western markets and causing the leveraged shorts to explode in a fireworks show.

Is this concerted? I don't think so. I think we simply have a new massive herd of Chinese gamblers who are entering the speculation game by buying bitcoins and altcoins.

You said yourself we are all China's bitch. Here's something that just popped into my head:

Whacky conspiracy theory:

Price is being manipulated by the PBoC to accumulate a large position for the purpose of adding it to it's gold and foreign currency reserves. The ultimate goal is to make the renminbi a major world currency, possibly the world's reserve currency.

evidence for said whacky theory:

1. stochastics are funny.

2. Public airing of pro-bitcoin feature on public television followed by outright hostile words and policy, followed by...uncertainty"

evidence against said whacky theory:

1. That's the beauty of conspiracy theories. The lack of evidence merely shows you how deep it goes!

discuss.



1409. Post 6240679 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 16, 2014, 12:12:42 AM
You can't have winners without losers...

Only true in a zero-sum game.  More generally, you can't have competition without relative losers.

Correct. My money is still sitting in my trading account, so I am only a relative loser. Considering my initial buy-in price I am still doing rather well. Trading is not a zero sum game. Both parties feel they are better off or the trade would not take place.

I agree with you here.   However, you said the exact opposite a few times when you were being the cocky rendition of yourself.... I personally prefer the more reasonable version... but I am just one person...  Cheesy

It only appears I said the exact opposite. The confusion is understandable. Currency speculating is a zero sum game. One trader thinks the price will go up, one thinks the price will go down, and the person who wins gains the exact amount the other trader loses (minus trading fee). Trading in general is positive sum because we traders have different end goals. I specifically said I was hedging and that due to my cold storage coins I am in a net long position even though I sold my trading stash to lock in profits. The benefit for me is that I can endure the swings of the market for far longer now without relying on day trading profits. The benefit for the other trader is obvious, unless the market goes lower than his buy-in price and he sells then.



1410. Post 6240897 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 16, 2014, 01:19:12 AM

First, where the hell did this myth come from that it is a good thing when a currency is tied to gold.

From numerous members of the Austrian School of economics (Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, etc). Alan Greenspan was also a "goldbug" back when he was an acolyte of Ayn Rand.

The central premise is that Central Bankers cannot know how much liquidity the market needs because they don't have the ability to collect and process the information that millions of local buyers and sellers have. The natural scarcity of gold prevents them from injecting too much liquidity, which causes an unsustainable boom, which causes a bust.

Busts in fact are corrections, times where capital is transferred from incompetent managers to competent managers in order for that capital to be used in more productive ways.

In short: Central Bankers with good intentions screw things up. Central Bankers with bad intentions screw things up. The free market also screws things up, but not as badly as Central Bankers do.

I am even more liberal (in the economic sense) than the goldbugs. I think there should be no legal tender and that the free market should determine what the most liquid commodity is, and we should call that commodity "money".





1411. Post 6241151 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 16, 2014, 01:19:12 AM


If Greenspan gave the power to the private sector, then it's logical that those who are at the top of the private sector have the the most important vote on things.

They have the most important vote on things now.  Who do you think vets the candidates for high office? Who do you think funds campaigns? A State is by it's very nature a monopoly on aggressive force. Governments always and everywhere serve to concentrate power in the hands of the already powerful. Even democracy by it's very nature is the dominance of the minority by the majority.

There can be no stable distribution of power with the existence of a monopoly of initiatory violence. Everybody struggles for control of the monopoly and the people with the most resources and power almost always win. Even when they lose, the loss is only temporary or new oligarchs move in.

The only stable long term viable solution is to distribute governance. Decentralize. Concentrated power is bad no matter who has it. It corrupts when it it not possessed by the already corrupt.



1412. Post 6241903 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 16, 2014, 02:36:26 AM

I think that it's very hard to decentralize power because of human nature. If you put 10 people together to do a task, then soon nature will do it's thing and some will automaticly lead and some will follow. I think that the main key here would be to block options, where people could obtain power not by natural selection, but by deception. Violence is also strongly rooted in human nature and it takes a good violent person to be able to take down a bad violent person. I think that the main key here is to root out general corruption and to nurture virtues.
I have had an idea that it would be great if there would be a system where academic accomplishes would actualy give different people different rights to vote on different choices, that the government has to make. The internet could actually enable this method to be efficient enough. You needed more centralization before the age of internet, because you can imagine the inefficiency when an interviewer would have to visit people door to door, just to get their votes on different everyday subjects. But with the internet this could actually work. It would be great if you could concentrate the smartest people on every subject and let them make the best informed decisions possible on the subject they know best.


Violence is inevitable, but the sanction against initiating violence is what differentiates the civilized from barbarians and savages. The State is the one great exception we make for no clear reason except that's what we've always had. There will always be leaders and followers, but there need not be rulers.  Even if there are rulers, rulers with small domains are less harmful than rulers with large domains.

I think civilization is inevitably going to revert back to city states simply because they are more efficient and technology is making large populations ungovernable. I think it will be a long process but ultimately a step in the right direction. I have very little faith in academics because they suffer almost no consequences for their bad ideas.






1413. Post 6241965 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: TERA on April 16, 2014, 03:45:25 AM
the end of bitcoin

??



1414. Post 6242391 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: TERA on April 16, 2014, 04:00:20 AM
People here accuse me of saying 'the end of bitcoin' all the time so I might as well start actually doing it.

The problem I see with you entering the forex market besides not being able to see volume is that you will basically have to guess what future central bank liquidity decisions are and attempt to front run them. It's the ultimate rigged market.

 



1415. Post 6242642 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: TERA on April 16, 2014, 04:18:42 AM
I think there was a covert bear mission to jump onto a moving train and detach the engine. Now all the bitcoiners are unknowingly stuck in cars that are just drifting down the track. But they don't know because they're busy with champagne and disco lights.

Then they've done their job.  This market doesn't exist to make us money. We get paid to reduce volatility.



1416. Post 6242897 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 16, 2014, 05:31:09 AM
Wedge closing in Huobi just about now. It's a game of musical chairs and the music is stopping. Short or long?

Given that we are now in a long-term uptrend (since Thursday last, untill August next), your default should always be long.  Use it unless the counterpoint case is deeply compelling. I am at 100 on a scale of -100 to 250.

It's way too early to say that with confidence. Yes, long term uptrends have to start somewhere, but a week isn't long term anything.



1417. Post 6243420 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on April 16, 2014, 05:46:11 AM
A 4k buy with maximum slippage right at the end of a wedge. The guy had plenty of time to buy during the wedge and instead chooses to buy when it hurts his wallet the most. Looks like manipulation to me.

There's just something off about this rally. I understood the rally after silk road closed.  I understood the rally after Gox closed. I don't understand balls to the wall in China when The PBoC has not reversed policy or no major exchange has closed. A market that suddenly changes direction without a retest of support and news that amounts to a loophole that may or may not be closed?

To use Alan Greenspan's term, it looks like "irrational exuberance".  Demand that appears this suddenly can disappear just as suddenly. Supply that can disappear suddenly can reappear suddenly. The market is too thinly traded to be trusted.




1418. Post 6243642 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on April 16, 2014, 06:36:09 AM
I made so many bad decisions today it's not even funny. I can't fucking believe that I managed to lose some money on this drop to 340 and rise up instead of making a killing.

I'm in the same club. I took my principal away long time ago, but still! Almost half of my gains in coins since December have been wiped.

I don't think they were bad trades. Somebody with an enormous amount of fiat and coins made trades designed to crush small traders.  There are forces at work I don't understand and I'm not back in the market until I understand them.

It's not bad TA. My TA always sucked. I read a story about Doyle Brunsun folding a full house Aces over jacks because some betting was going on in the game he didn't understand. It turned out he made the right choice.

There seems to be massive insider trading. Not skimming. It seems like someone is trying to take it all, to corner the market. A market traded as thinly as Bitcoin (relative to market cap) is vulnerable.



1419. Post 6243787 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 16, 2014, 06:45:40 AM
There's just something off about this rally. I understood the rally after silk road closed.  I understood the rally after Gox closed. I don't understand balls to the wall in China when The PBoC has not reversed policy or no major exchange has closed. A market that suddenly changes direction without a retest of support and news that amounts to a loophole that may or may not be closed?

To use Alan Greenspan's term, it looks like "irrational exuberance".  Demand that appears this suddenly can disappear just as suddenly. Supply that can disappear suddenly can reappear suddenly.

Why such confusion? Did you really understand the decline from 600 to 340 in face of nothing but positive news and developments? To me, that was the irrational part. The exuberance starts when we cross the exponential trendline somewhere around 2000.

Quote
The market is too thinly traded to be trusted.

Nothing is real except the bitcoins you have in an address whose key is offline-generated by you.

You're damn right about that last part. The Confusion is China China China China, China China China oh, nevermind. Huh? The decline AND the snap back were irrational.

Why is everybody suddenly so sure a four month bear market is over? Yes prices dropped ridiculously low, but there are periods of consolidation between rallies. Even if you think the four year log trend is ongoing, those consolidation periods are part of that trend line.



1420. Post 6244415 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

I know this sounds whacky, and it probably is, but the 12 HR chart on Huobi looks like one giant bot trading pattern. I have certain advanced pattern recognitions skills I have been tested for, but I can't explain how they work. It's just a feeling.  The danger is that the lower the signal to noise ratio, the greater your risk of picking up false patterns. It's not unlike Professor Nash reading Russian Codes into all those newspapers in the movie " A Beautiful Mind".

So I'm going to preface this by saying I'm probably wrong and it's most likely sour grapes from missing a bunch of trades, but I get the feeling that this is something massive, like a fraud on the scale of Mt. Gox or even greater.

I'm not a conspiracy guy. 911 truthers weird me out. I think Oswald acted alone. I don't believe in Bigfoot, Nessie or the Loch Ness Sea Monster. I think conspiracy types use the Illuminati or whatever to avoid the personal blame for being losers. So I know how stupid this is going to make me look, but something is just not right.

I don't feel like someone's out to get me. I feel like someone's out to get everyone. I'm a dude. I can't afford to make decisions based on feelings. I have to make decisions based on reason. So I need to step back and try to regain some self-awareness. This is much more likely a problem with my perception than a problem with the market, but it is such a powerful feeling of foreboding and I have no evidence at all to back it up.



1421. Post 6244870 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: rudius on April 16, 2014, 08:09:42 AM
I know this sounds whacky, and it probably is, but the 12 HR chart on Huobi looks like one giant bot trading pattern. I have certain advanced pattern recognitions skills I have been tested for, but I can't explain how they work. It's just a feeling.  The danger is that the lower the signal to noise ratio, the greater your risk of picking up false patterns. It's not unlike Professor Nash reading Russian Codes into all those newspapers in the movie " A Beautiful Mind".

So I'm going to preface this by saying I'm probably wrong and it's most likely sour grapes from missing a bunch of trades, but I get the feeling that this is something massive, like a fraud on the scale of Mt. Gox or even greater.

I'm not a conspiracy guy. 911 truthers weird me out. I think Oswald acted alone. I don't believe in Bigfoot, Nessie or the Loch Ness Sea Monster. I think conspiracy types use the Illuminati or whatever to avoid the personal blame for being losers. So I know how stupid this is going to make me look, but something is just not right.

I don't feel like someone's out to get me. I feel like someone's out to get everyone. I'm a dude. I can't afford to make decisions based on feelings. I have to make decisions based on reason. So I need to step back and try to regain some self-awareness. This is much more likely a problem with my perception than a problem with the market, but it is such a powerful feeling of foreboding and I have no evidence at all to back it up.

Man,
Why are you flipping ideas every hour. With your idea about china wanted all the bitcoins, you must have been right. They are manipulating us since the beginning. That is just fair b/c they are putting their money on the line.

You just pushed it a little too far with the gov wanted bitcoin as a reserve currency Wink that must have been some good weed ^^
But chinese individuals, surely wanted a biggest share of the pie. They are just buying as quick as they could before western people wake up. This is the first buying round. All chinese doing.

Well, this is only what i think anyway.

I was NOT putting that forward as a real working theory, but more of a joke, something that just popped in my head.  I didn't say the Chinese want Bitcoins as the world reserve currency. I jokingly said they wanted it as part of their foreign currency reserves so that the renminbi could become a major world currency. It is a whacky theory. Occam's razor applies. The simplest explanation is most likely correct.  If there is a major manipulation plan, which there probably isn't, it is most likely private actors doing it for personal benefit.



1422. Post 6245047 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: nanobrain on April 16, 2014, 08:12:51 AM
I'm a dude. I can't afford to make decisions based on feelings. I have to make decisions based on reason.

No, that's just the sexual politics you've been brought up with.

If you were a dude hunting sabre-tooth tiger and you felt the feelings you are having now you would act on them and avoid being eaten by some large nasty creature.  That's how we managed to survive and evolve.

Emotional intelligence has nothing to do with being a man or a woman.  Listen and acknowledge what your instinct is telling you and add it to the mix when decision making: if it helps, this is the sort of advice survivalists, criminologists, even the military etc provide for situations when 'data' is insufficient.

We have evolved all sorts of instincts that were helpful in more primitive environments but harmful now. For example we are hungry too often and tend to over eat. I think you have sexual politics backwards. We are expected to suppress natural masculine behavior more and more in modern society. You subtly imply that I'm sexist for even saying their are masculine traits such as the tendency to act less on emotion that women do.  Men and women have brains that are wired differently. The two hemispheres in males are less interconnected than with females. It's one reason why there are no women chess champions.



1423. Post 6245327 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 16, 2014, 08:57:31 AM
where is Adam BTW ? I didn't seem him around for days now.

I've been thinking the same.

Where is the OP?

My guess is he lost his ass making bad trades. Turned bear at the worst possible moment. Maybe that's just the mood I'm in.



1424. Post 6245661 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

In a worst case scenario, we have bears who just got wiped out and can not act to catch the falling knife when they cover their shorts, bulls with no fiat ammo left and the few guys left with any fiat like myself extremely gun shy. It could get ugly. 

I have a small order near the bottom $340 support level and that's it. There's no trading this. We're bugs on a windshield.



1425. Post 6251422 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 16, 2014, 08:52:25 AM
I'm a dude. I can't afford to make decisions based on feelings. I have to make decisions based on reason.

No, that's just the sexual politics you've been brought up with.

If you were a dude hunting sabre-tooth tiger and you felt the feelings you are having now you would act on them and avoid being eaten by some large nasty creature.  That's how we managed to survive and evolve.

Emotional intelligence has nothing to do with being a man or a woman.  Listen and acknowledge what your instinct is telling you and add it to the mix when decision making: if it helps, this is the sort of advice survivalists, criminologists, even the military etc provide for situations when 'data' is insufficient.

We have evolved all sorts of instincts that were helpful in more primitive environments but harmful now. For example we are hungry too often and tend to over eat. I think you have sexual politics backwards. We are expected to suppress natural masculine behavior more and more in modern society. You subtly imply that I'm sexist for even saying their are masculine traits such as the tendency to act less on emotion that women do.  Men and women have brains that are wired differently. The two hemispheres in males are less interconnected than with females. It's one reason why there are no women chess champions.

EDIT: Typo. It's MALES who have less interconnected brains. I'm not saying it means that men are smarter at everything. That is not the case. It's more like we have brain damage that gives us rain-man like abilities compared to women because our brains cannot do what women's brains can do so we focus on what we can focus on. It's a disability that frees us up to do what we do best, not unlike blind people getting more information from sound even when their hearing is no better than anyone else's.
This is intentional hyperbole to make a point, but the cumulative effect on large populations is noticeable and measurable.

I don't give a shit if you call me "sexist" or not. Name-calling is not rational argument.






1426. Post 6252169 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: rjp55 on April 16, 2014, 02:53:02 PM



I was wrong about the 3220 wall, it was broken with more bullish sentiment than expected. But the chart I posted yesterday is still following the same pattern, just at a slightly higher price than expected.  we are in a very similar situation to march 4th / 5th at the moment, and the markets are behaving almost exactly the same.  

Not many interested in buying in this uncertain climate, so the best guess I can form is, the same as what happened in march.  I think we will settle at around 490 and go sideways again...  until the volume goes very low.

All this can change, based on (valid) news or well executed FUD.  (possessive or negative).

A simplistic way of looking at the market, yet quite often effective.  History repeats itself imho.  

So history repeats itself until when? We go to zero?

It repeats itself until it doesn't. Until whatever is causing this to happen stops causing it to happen or is outweighed by other factors. Rationality is sometimes beneficial, but sometimes the safety of the herd is beneficial when predators are around. We have to have a healthy respect for our limitations as well as our abilities. There is the unknown and then there is the unknowable.

Bitcoin cost of production is too high right now relative to utility value. The speculative value to me and I imagine many others right now is negative. I don't have the tools to trade with confidence in this environment. I don't speak Mandarin or Cantonese. I'm very good with language, but Google translate does not allow me to pick up the subtle cues that give me a small edge.

My TA sucks, but my skill at language allows me to know who's TA to trust. The people I trust who are more skillful than me, and are intelligent and honest tell me not to trade, so I'm not trading. Bitcoin may be a fantastic buy for someone right now, but not for someone with my investment portfolio. Again, if the situation changes then my position will change, but not before that.

China is an unknown. in the amount of time I have, it is an unknowable. I'm hedging.



1427. Post 6252761 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: octaft on April 16, 2014, 04:47:58 PM


There will be differences in every individual, of course. Maybe you have more of a female brain than you realize. Wink

Possibly true and I don't consider that an insult, but I doubt it. I am extremely right-handed and test higher in areas where you would expect a male to test higher. My best class in Naval Nuclear Power School was physics. 

My main skill is language. I was the first person to identify TERA as a woman, something she has never refuted. If I'm right and TERA is female, then she is a very unusual female, one who excels in traditionally male-dominated fields. The I.Q. bell curve for women is less flat, so that means she is very rare.

Trade what you know. The key to winning an argument is framing the debate. The key to winning a fight is choosing the battlefield that best suits your strengths.
It's not all tactics. It's strategy too.



1428. Post 6252883 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: oda.krell on April 16, 2014, 05:37:45 PM

Don't make a complex situation simpler than it is.


Don't make a simple situation more complex than it is. I can't believe I'm backing trolfi here, but he's right. The exchange with the most liquidity is the exchange with the most liquidity because of network effects. Bitcoin is the dominant cryptocurrency because bitcoin is the dominant cryptocurrency. The market will follow China because the Market will follow China.  These things are very sticky and something BIG has to happen for that to change.



1429. Post 6252954 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: bobdude17 on April 16, 2014, 05:47:40 PM
Just in case you guys aren't watching Reddit:

Second Market Exchange is now LIVE!

https://www.secondmarket.com/bitcoin-trading

25BTC transaction minimum.


Ahead of schedule.

Volume? Volume is key.



1430. Post 6253128 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: jonoiv on April 16, 2014, 05:49:31 PM

A simplistic way of looking at the market, yet quite often effective.  History repeats itself imho.  

So history repeats itself until when? We go to zero?

It repeats itself until it doesn't. Until whatever is causing this to happen stops causing it to happen or is outweighed by other factors. Rationality is sometimes beneficial, but sometimes the safety of the herd is beneficial when predators are around. We have to have a healthy respect for our limitations as well as our abilities. There is the unknown and then there is the unknowable.

Bitcoin cost of production is too high right now relative to utility value. The speculative value to me and I imagine many others right now is negative. I don't have the tools to trade with confidence in this environment. I don't speak Mandarin or Cantonese. I'm very good with language, but Google translate does not allow me to pick up the subtle cues that give me a small edge.

My TA sucks, but my skill at language allows me to know who's TA to trust. The people I trust who are more skillful than me, and are intelligent and honest tell me not to trade, so I'm not trading. Bitcoin may be a fantastic buy for someone right now, but not for someone with my investment portfolio. Again, if the situation changes then my position will change, but not before that.

China is an unknown. in the amount of time I have, it is an unknowable. I'm hedging.

I expect it to follow the same path.  That's why I'm not buying back for the time being.

And if trusting people are more or less intelligent based on language you are very mislead,  plenty of very cleaver foreign people posting that may not have a total grasp of the language.

language is a non-logical skill learned via repetition and imitation. Countless genii of pure logic, science and art throughout history were thought to be dyslexic and were poor at written language skills.

Albert Einstein
Galileo Galilei
Leonardo da Vinci
Steve Jobs
John Lennon
Jonoiv Cheesy Cheesy  (kidding)

to name a few!

Don't misunderstand me. I'm not saying language skills make someone intelligent. I'm saying MY language skills allow me to identify intelligence and many other traits in other people. Vocabulary is a major indicator, but you are quite correct that genius appears in many forms, and that foreigners with limited English may be extremely smart.

For example I'm almost positive Dorian is not Satoshi because of his language. Dorian is very smart, but for him to be Satoshi, it would require an elaborate effort to mislead and misdirect that is exceedingly improbable. Occam's Razor applies. Leah Goodman is a writer. She should have known better.






1431. Post 6253242 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 16, 2014, 05:50:20 PM
These things are very sticky and something BIG has to happen for that to change.

Certainly, something BIG, but it can happen gradually, without attracting attention, until suddenly everyone wakes up one day and realizes that events in China are no longer impacting price action disproportionately.


Of course, but something that gradually makes China less relevant will effect the market gradually as well. Some day China WILL BE less relevant, but a gradual change mean it's improbable that day will be soon.

There are almost always flat spots between major rallies.



1432. Post 6253396 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: bobdude17 on April 16, 2014, 05:56:29 PM
Just in case you guys aren't watching Reddit:

Second Market Exchange is now LIVE!

https://www.secondmarket.com/bitcoin-trading

25BTC transaction minimum.


Ahead of schedule.

Volume? Volume is key.

Doesn't matter right now. Being American is key.

Bullshit. CampBX has been around for over three years. It had excellent design and security for the time. It still does. It remained a backwater even with all the crap Gox put us through, Karpele's House of  Buggery remained the main exchange.

The Market cannot be wrong. The customer is always right or he's not you customer. The Market is the Market. We don't serve the market we want.. We serve the market we have. I'll jump to second market when there is a market there or if I find an edge. Not before.



1433. Post 6253530 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: octaft on April 16, 2014, 06:18:09 PM


Notice how all those people he listed are guys. Language skills are a female brain strength.

Your brain might not be completely female, but it definitely likes to throw on dresses and go out on the town every now and then.  Cheesy

I don't mean this as an insult, glad to see you're not taking it that way.

LOL. That's funny. Most great writers and orators are men. Language may be a female brain strength, but because the male bell curve is flatter, Exceptional men often outperform exceptional women at even the stuff women are good at. 

A more politically correct way of putting it is that men are more often weird and women are more often normal. I embrace the weird.



1434. Post 6253586 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: bobdude17 on April 16, 2014, 06:31:56 PM
Just in case you guys aren't watching Reddit:

Second Market Exchange is now LIVE!

https://www.secondmarket.com/bitcoin-trading

25BTC transaction minimum.


Ahead of schedule.

Volume? Volume is key.

Doesn't matter right now. Being American is key.

Bullshit. CampBX has been around for over three years. It had excellent design and security for the time. It still does. It remained a backwater even with all the crap Gox put us through, Karpele's House of  Buggery remained the main exchange.

The Market cannot be wrong. The customer is always right or he's not you customer. The Market is the Market. We don't serve the market we want.. We serve the market we have. I'll jump to second market when there is a market there or if I find an edge. Not before.

CampBX has a combined daily deposit/withdrawal limit of $1,000. Please tell me you're joking.

That proves my point, not yours. I used it three years ago for the same reason you think people will use Second Market now. Nobody followed. The market jumps when the market jumps, not when you or I think it ought to jump. I'll move there when and if others move there, not before.



1435. Post 6253631 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on April 16, 2014, 06:33:46 PM

Of course there are moment when some other exchanges take control for short time but this time, beside his usual biased bullshit Jorge is right in general.

We can deny it as much as we want but Bitcoin is currently China's bitch and largely depends on each fart coming from that part of the world. Their government decisions or even only rumors about them are moving the market as a wheel. It might change at some time surely but right now we are under China's mercy completely and that's awful thing, specially for people who are trading as no skills and indicators can beat a single news coming from China. And their exchanges are in most cases the market leaders.

Jorge has hypnotised you  Wink
To interpret his input you need to work from his premise, I believe it goes like this. Bitcoin is not an investment but a bet with unknowable odds. Every input thereafter is an attempt at manipulating the odds in a 0 sum game.

That is a brilliant summary. Better said than he ever said it.



1436. Post 6254044 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: uhoh on April 16, 2014, 06:43:17 PM
Just in case you guys aren't watching Reddit:

Second Market Exchange is now LIVE!

https://www.secondmarket.com/bitcoin-trading

25BTC transaction minimum.


Ahead of schedule.

Volume? Volume is key.

Doesn't matter right now. Being American is key.

Bullshit. CampBX has been around for over three years. It had excellent design and security for the time. It still does. It remained a backwater even with all the crap Gox put us through, Karpele's House of  Buggery remained the main exchange.

The Market cannot be wrong. The customer is always right or he's not you customer. The Market is the Market. We don't serve the market we want.. We serve the market we have. I'll jump to second market when there is a market there or if I find an edge. Not before.

CampBX has a combined daily deposit/withdrawal limit of $1,000. Please tell me you're joking.

That proves my point, not yours. I used it three years ago for the same reason you think people will use Second Market now. Nobody followed. The market jumps when the market jumps, not when you or I think it ought to jump. I'll move there when and if others move there, not before.

There is a reason to use SecondMarket. They're a fully registered and compliant brokerage firm. I'll personally definitely be using them when I cash out.

There may be plenty of very good reasons to use an exchange, but the main reason to use an exchange is that others are using that exchange. Sellers have to go where the buyers are. Buyers have to go where the sellers are. People are herd animals. Herds have leaders, but leadership comes at a cost. Coinbase had to incentivize by giving $5 of BTC to switch.  Safety means little if fees are too high, etc.



1437. Post 6255237 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on April 16, 2014, 07:19:30 PM
You do seem to be raving at this point Jorge.  It's kind of sad.

He's obviously frustrated he'll need to return the party supplies he bought in preparation of Bitcoin hitting zero. I wonder if all his bias, assumptions, and poor judgment will appear in the peer-reviewed conclusion of his "academic research."

That's funny and of course he's having a gross conceptual error, but China still leads until it doesn't. If you think his head is exploding, you should see the economist professors of the Keynesian and Monetarist schools. This is their field, and according to their models, Bitcoin is a flying unicorn that just shouldn't exist.



1438. Post 6268481 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

I've been doing some research on the macroeconomic conditions in China and they are not looking good. What that means for Bitcoin is unknown of course, because it depends on how badly the Chi-Coms and the PBoC react to it, and whether the flight to safety such as bonds, PMs and cash will include bitcoin.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-04-16/richest-man-asia-selling-everything-china

There is a high probability that China will crank up the printing presses. Poor(er) Chinese will either use Bitcoin as a hedge on inflation, use more traditional precious metals, or they will be too broke to hedge at all. Chinese capital is invested in all the wrong places. This was the inevitable consequence of their neo-mercantilist foreign trade policy, as it was for Japan and every other country that tried it.








1439. Post 6272822 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: rudius on April 17, 2014, 06:31:18 PM
. This was the inevitable consequence of their neo-mercantilist foreign trade policy, as it was for Japan and every other country that tried it.

Could you develop please? Not sure what you mean...

When the government and/or Central Bank of a country has an explicit and intentional policy of having a positive trade surplus. You would think that this would be a good policy until you look for the hidden costs.

By intentionally devaluing their currency (in order to make their exports look cheaper to the buyers), they also increase their input costs, because foreign raw materials get more expensive. They know this will happen, but think an abundance of cheap domestic labor will more than compensate. They are generally right, but there is a limit.  As their customers--countries with trade deficits--get poorer (as they usually will with large sustained and growing trade deficits), they have less and less ability to buy until they can only buy on credit. So the neo-mercantilist country lends them money (usually in the form of buying government bonds from the customer country . This amounts to loans that become increasingly less and less likely to get paid back.

The United States is almost certainly going to default on its government bonds in one of two ways: either a hard default where we stop making interest payments or more likely a soft default where we crank up our own printing presses and pay interest with devalued money.  The American government has already begun this process.

Basically Chinese capital is heavily invested in factories making stuff for foreigners and in domestic real estate developments. Neither of these markets show signs of much further growth and the capital was borrowed, which means they have little ability to withstand a prolonged downturn. To make matters worse, much of their population were former farm workers who moved to the cities when the farms modernized. If these people lose or cannot find employment, civil unrest becomes increasingly likely.

Then the politicians will do what politicians always do: look for someone else to blame for their mistakes. The most extreme example of this is Germans blaming Jews in the 1930s, but any group will suffice if there is a pretext. If the situation deteriorates far enough, a probable outcome is war.

The situation is much more complicated than that, but I have tried to give a simplified version. I foresee a race to the bottom where most countries try to debase, debauch and devalue their own currency faster than other countries until somebody cracks. What i am saying is that China shows signs of cracking. Japan has already begun the process of cracking, because they have a 30 year head start in the process.

Neo-mercantilism is not free trade. It is managed trade by managers who do not and cannot know how the resources should properly be deployed.  It always ends badly.



1440. Post 6273677 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 17, 2014, 10:00:46 PM
I foresee a race to the bottom where most countries try to debase, debauch and devalue their own currency faster than other countries until somebody cracks. What i am saying is that China shows signs of cracking. Japan has already begun the process of cracking, because they have a 30 year head start in the process.

Since 2008 *everyone* has been devaluing their currency.   But its not competitive devaluation, it's co-operative devaluation, an open conspiracy of central banks.  By co-ordination they avoid excessive relative slippage, which avoids most of the political problems with inflating away debt -- the rest are solved by simply funneling money to the principal debtors.  The ECB, because of its nominal mandate, has a really hard time monetizing debt on its own, but it can accomplish this through the back door by coordinated easing.  I don't know what is the quid pro quo they are giving to the U.S., but I'm sure the tab will come due sooner or later.  This kinda, sorta works as long as all the majors are co-operating.  It has been brutal for emerging markets, and it may fall apart if one of the majors defects badly, but it does kick the can another lap down the road.


Your evaluation is not greatly in conflict with mine. The details matter a little, but as I said, I am simplifying. The bank's willingness to coordinate with other central banks depends on how politically autonomous they are. The governments certainly are competing, and the end result is the same. Yes, they are all kicking the can, but the end of the road is coming, sooner for some than for others.




1441. Post 6278087 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

I know a lot of readers and traders are sick of talking about China, and that is understandable, but the simple fact is they are relevant until they are not.

Further research into the macroeconomy of the PRoC indicates that key officials actually do understand the inherent dangers of rampant credit growth and misdirected capital (what we Austrian economists call "malinvestment").  They appear to be attempting a "soft landing", meaning they are actually tightening credit in order to attempt to control the economic contraction that everybody sees coming. They are probably not going to tighten enough, because the danger of a catastrophic crash is too great if they over do it, but that is by no means certain. These are smart people faced with the impossible task of figuring out just how much liquidity the market needs.

How ironic that even here in Bitcoin, investment strategy is still so heavily dependent on front-running policy decisions by central banks.

What this means for Bitcoin is that there is unlikely to be much growth in China of new users, at least not enough to matter much in the next few months. That does not mean that existing investors and speculators won't increase their bitcoin purchases if they are able to, and conditions seem to warrant. There also remains a non-zero probability of a major Chinese liquidity event, such as the closure of a large exchange, even more hostile policy, policy interpretation or enforcement from thePBoC or the State.




1442. Post 6278641 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 18, 2014, 08:13:14 AM
I know a lot of readers and traders are sick of talking about China, and that is understandable, but the simple fact is they are relevant until they are not.

Further research into the macroeconomy of the PRoC indicates that key officials actually do understand the inherent dangers of rampant credit growth and misdirected capital (what we Austrian economists call "malinvestment").  They appear to be attempting a "soft landing", meaning they are actually tightening credit in order to attempt to control the economic contraction that everybody sees coming. They are probably not going to tighten enough, because the danger of a catastrophic crash is too great if they over do it, but that is by no means certain. These are smart people faced with the impossible task of figuring out just how much liquidity the market needs.

How ironic that even here in Bitcoin, investment strategy is still so heavily dependent on front-running policy decisions by central banks.

What this means for Bitcoin is that there is unlikely to be much growth in China of new users, at least not enough to matter much in the next few months. That does not mean that existing investors and speculators won't increase their bitcoin purchases if they are able to, and conditions seem to warrant. There also remains a non-zero probability of a major Chinese liquidity event, such as the closure of a large exchange, even more hostile policy, policy interpretation or enforcement from thePBoC or the State.



I though that some exchanges already talked about moving out of china... like to hong kong ?  or was that just rumors?  and really moving would NOT necessarily solve the china issue for customers in china.. .. just would allow the exchange to keep operating from its new location.

They did talk about moving, but we should know by now that we just can't trust Chinese exchanges and should be wary of all exchanges. Doesn't mean they are lying. It means they are untrustworthy. It means we can't be sure of a bull market until after it's already happened or until the Chinese are out of the picture. It sucks.



1443. Post 6278682 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on April 18, 2014, 09:12:31 AM
Huobi dump 3 days straight same time, why?

I wish we would stop caring.

I wish we would too, but I can't stop caring until everybody else does or until coins are so damn cheap I can afford to buy and sit on them for years.



1444. Post 6278761 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: TERA on April 18, 2014, 08:58:03 AM
Huobi dump 3 days straight same time, why?
The Chinese are very organized and methodical.

and smart. don't forget smart. I think there are Chinese sharks eating Chinese suckers are we are all just along for the ride or collateral damage. Something is rotten in China and I don't know what it is and probably won't know until the damage is already done.

Meet the new Gox, same as the old Gox.



1445. Post 6278866 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: magicmexican on April 18, 2014, 09:30:40 AM
Yea okay, looks like its 460 minimum, and most likely testing 440 and below

It does look that way, but looks can sometimes be deceiving. Somebody with a lot of money and a lot of coins is fucking with us. And his name is prolly Lee Ho Fook or something like that.



1446. Post 6279154 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: TERA on April 18, 2014, 09:45:21 AM
Everyone just shut up and trade. Thank the Chinese for all this magnificient volatility and profit making opportunities. It's not like you don't get ample TA indicators to tell to buy and sell when the trend is changing. The candle didn't just go straight down to 700 to 340 or straight up from 340 to 540 or straight down thereafter and then just die at the new level. No. There are ample bounces, indicators, and opportunities. You have hours to realize the 1H MACD is going down and then days to realize the 4H and 1D are going down before most of the damage is gone. But instead of paying attention you sit there in some state of denial complaining about how chinese shouldn't be able to control the trend. You ignore the chart indicators because of your belief, and then complain later and ask why you are losing. "but... but... it's just china fud. the west should control bitcoin". Well that's too bad. You just have to accept reality and roll with the punches.

I do accept reality, including the reality that I'm just not good enough to trade this, T. We're not as skilled at this as you are, at least I'm not. That's why we're not shutting up.
Take your own advice or give us some more help.  I have to wait for the market to sink significantly lower or just wave it goodbye as it goes farther out of reach. I feel dumb and it's pissing me off.

I was positioned at $427 before you were by a day, but that head-fake dump to $400 threw me off. How did you know to jump in at the same time I jumped out?? It had nothing to do with the 1 hr, 4 HR or 1 day MACD, and it happened in minutes.



1447. Post 6279769 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: TERA on April 18, 2014, 10:21:58 AM

Here was my 425 long entry. It did not coincide with any particular MACD cross at that exact time - I cannot always rely on MACD all the time. sometimes I have to react to sudden unsual breakouts by entering on their retracements. In this case, the 1 hour MACD had gone up at $415 about 6 hours ago, but I did not want to enter then because it looked like 4 hour MACD was going down. I think the candle was even just barely red right before this breakout. Then suddenly there is a huge break upwards on high volume. So I look look for the first retracement to enter on, which was at $425.

So how did you know not to react to the unusual move DOWN that immediately preceded it?  That evaporation of bid side orders followed by dumping was just as unexpected, wasn't it?



1448. Post 6280249 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: TERA on April 18, 2014, 11:51:32 AM
How about you ask yourself "why did it go up 60%" in the first place?

That's exactly what I'm asking myself.



1449. Post 6280430 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: rjp55 on April 18, 2014, 12:05:25 PM
Well, for a long term investor, it is really better to not check the charts and the forum for a half year, just like I did last year. Because this price movements are really silly Grin

Day traders are dedicated, I give them that much. I track major bubble movements and overall sentiments, but some stuff I read on here is from 24 hour chart watchers who seem to make decisions and start drawing lines with every $5 fluctuation in price. I could never do that. I just hope they are successful enough to make it worth their while, let alone not lose their shirt. Seems like a sad way to spend a majority of one's time, especially with nice weather on the horizon (here in Canada anyways, I am hoping).

Successful day traders provide a vital function. They are the liquidity providers, the decentral bankers of Bitcoin. They reduce volatility by profiting from it. They accomplish this without even intending to, by looking after their own interest.



1450. Post 6280676 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: magicmexican on April 18, 2014, 12:23:26 PM
So predictable its kinda scary

THIS part is, but will I get my $340 retest? If it holds on high volume, we can tell the Chinese to reary go fook themselves.



1451. Post 6280731 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: mmitech on April 18, 2014, 12:25:42 PM
Well, for a long term investor, it is really better to not check the charts and the forum for a half year, just like I did last year. Because this price movements are really silly Grin

Day traders are dedicated, I give them that much. I track major bubble movements and overall sentiments, but some stuff I read on here is from 24 hour chart watchers who seem to make decisions and start drawing lines with every $5 fluctuation in price. I could never do that. I just hope they are successful enough to make it worth their while, let alone not lose their shirt. Seems like a sad way to spend a majority of one's time, especially with nice weather on the horizon (here in Canada anyways, I am hoping).

Successful day traders provide a vital function. They are the liquidity providers, the decentral bankers of Bitcoin. They reduce volatility by profiting from it. They accomplish this without even intending to, by looking after their own interest.

I don't agree with your statement, inexperienced daily traders are causing the volatility, or should I call them "pigs" that jumps in and out without knowing what they are doing, a small price drop (5$) makes them sell and bring the price down and shout "Bitcoin IS DONE, IT IS THE END", then a small rise of 5$ makes them all buy back and yell "TO DA MOON".....


Why should Bitcoin go to wallstreet if wallstreet traders can make tons of money from such unregulated market with all these noobs around ? the moment Bitcoin hit Wall street they will lose this kind of game....take china as an example, anyone farts there the price crash, no new news, they use the same old thing to trigger panic and make tons of money.... I find it really hard to make money the last few months, I used to take a spot and stick to it when we didn't have these Chinese shit around, now it is impossible to predict a direction... because you know "you never know when the Chinese fart".

That's why I qualified my statement and said "successful" traders. Noobs only exist to pay off the vets unless they learn before they go broke.



1452. Post 6281028 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 18, 2014, 12:56:38 PM
You ignore the chart indicators because of your belief, and then complain later and ask why you are losing.

I ignore the chart indicators, because I still don't know how to read chart indicators. I'm still learning, so I follow this forum for advice, and then follow the forum's advice not to follow any advice I find on this forum.

I have no idea whether I should be shorting right now and buying back lower. Last time I panic sold, I lost 1/8 of my investment.


No one can "read" the chart indicators correctly all the time because there are too many of them and they more often than not conflict. TERA, who admittedly does not do well unless there is a raging bull cycle, is telling people to do more of what he does. Not sure why.

At any rate, a good understanding of both technicals and fundamentals, a willingness to study the market behavior, and a good instinct is what you should aim for.

My 2cents here. Its not a great place to short. 520 was a great place to short.  This market is selling off on low volume into a lot of resistance. Sure it could do this for the next 2 weeks like it did in March, but thats not for certain. A news articles could crash it as well, but there is no news on the weekends most of the time.

I think its a good time to be out of coins into fiat until the continuation (my most likely scenario) of the bear market is confirmed.

I believe that I get what you are saying here; however how do you know when to get back in?  Are you getting back in, at some point?  $440-ish?  or lower?  and let's say we get to $440ish, then rally but bull trap?  you go based on volume to figure out whether it is a true rally?  it is just so hard to tell if there is a whale or two who seem to be selling at a loss, just to drive down prices.  You cannot be sure about when that whale is going to change strategies.

The Bitcoin day trading meat grinder: where the only line sure to go parabolic is the learning curve.



1453. Post 6284440 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: Post-Cosmic on April 18, 2014, 04:43:56 PM
Guys I think I spawned a wave of newbie acct creation. See all these folks w/ 1-10 posts suddenly popping up in more frequent regularity than before..? ;o

 Also Billy, don'tcha know, that the great rise from 340.. (which caught me by surprise, I had made SO much shorting dangerously, from 408, all the way down to 350's, when it showed it couldn't even climb back pathetically to 416, but then, I thought it'd keep going to 300's-320's so I re-shorted at 360..and held it far too long.. Only got convinced to go long way past that, around 460's.. =/)

 ..was obviously caused by some individuals/agencies enterprisingly taking the bull by the horns & asking the PBoC themselves, on Apr 10th, what exactly was really up w/ them 'hating on' & rumors of 'wanting to ban' bitcoin, to which they absolutely shocked the world (a shock that exacerbated how violent the bounce from 339/2200's was) by responding "..What? Bits of coins? Coin bit fermented tea leaves..? Ohh right, those tokens. We don't care about those, they're just an internet nerd joke play-money type-thing like collectible stamps, or antiques etc. 'Banning' something like that doesn't even enter the realm of considerations."

 Then, on TOP of that, OKCoin told everyone how proud they were of their brand new plans for deploying the very first Bitcoin ATM in mainland Sinaland, along w/ some others yammering something about software Point-of-Sale 'ATM'-functionality being designed as well. So, that's what made the entirety of chinese bitcoinland to cream their pants in a collective 'Stamp-BTCe-dominating' '2H-chart-price-rise-stairway' frenzy that could not reach a zenith of relief until all the way @ 3450's.

 So looking back, one can definitely attest this was not a groundless bull run. It nevertheless caused a major shift in sentiment all around, and makes it most probable that dropping below 390's again is a shrunkenly tiny possibility, while also indicating a break above 610-615 to be rather unlikely at this point, until the next major news/events are able to propel the trend beyond a ~400-600 channel in either direction.


It's entirely possible your analysis is correct and I really think the PBoC has bigger problems to worry about, but if sentiment can shift this easily, then it can also shift back this easily. Something is rotten in China and it probably has something to do with one or more of the major exchanges. Something vaguely gox-like may be brewing. It may be a false positive, but I can smell it. The volume and price movements are uncannily similar to March so far. This is my uninformed opinion and doesn't prove anything, obviously. Price movements are similar until they are not. Trends continue until they don't.

I'm not going to say "I told you so" to those who were saying we'd never see the $400s again, and I won't say "I told you so" to the $300s either if that happens. I'm just saying their are too many unknowns to justify me buying higher unless I get some compelling new information.





1454. Post 6284780 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: thezerg on April 18, 2014, 05:39:09 PM
margin shorts and longs both being closed out on bitfinex but shorts are the lowest in months at 6.5k btc.  Longs still on the high side at 14million.

This is retracement territory and if there is another big push, it will likely come from around here. However if the market goes sideways for any length of time, it is bearish. We're running a 15% off sale on Bitcoins and nobody's buying...yet.



1455. Post 6285000 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 18, 2014, 05:38:02 PM

Second: I do NOT know what you mean by Exemplary lesson.
Oh! Wel, well, well...  Grin

It is decided, then.

In order to avoid collateral damage to innocent readers, I will deliver the Exemplary Lesson to @JayJuanGee by private message.  If he never shows up again in this forum, you will all know why.  If he survives (and I sincerely hope that he will), perhaps he will recover enough to tell you all how bad it was.  In either case, all the other sinners out there will have a chance to repent.


LMAO!!!!!! Ohh I just had a grand realization - that notorious 'Final Lesson' Jorge has been warning us about in ominous terms since months now must be a candid pic of his decrepifying behind scantily clad in a hula skirt while doing a literal round of the 'spinning' he'd always been accused of doing here - a sight sure to indeed leave even most internet-hardened veterans scarred for life Grin  Prof., you must show mercy ahahaa

[..]

I found it to just be a continuation of the same thing that I had been accusing him.. non-responsive to my concerns about his intentionally spreading misinformation here.  Probably, we should NOT be calling him professor b/c that gives way too much credence to him and many of his non-sense posts...

[..]


Nahh, we may yet title him 'Prof.' merely as a tongue-in-cheek address in much the same way one humors a disheveled old homeless street joker in the Brooklyn subway  Cheesy

(Sorry Jorge I don't intend to be so mean - it's just teasing you is so irresistible  ;p)



I think that some posters already do that... they call him prof. as a form of exaggeration or to suggest that he should know better.

To each his own, and I sometimes will use such a title strategically, as well - in order to exaggerate a point.

On the other hand, I question whether he really is a professor... but doesnt really matter too much to me, either way.

Mostly important to attempt to stick with the substance; however, sometimes personal motivations and personal representation do become a part of attempting to know which posts to trust and which ones NOT to trust.  And, sometimes when a panic comes on, a trusted poster could help to put matters into perspective.  An untrusted poster could assist to accomplish the same, as long as the reader understands that the particular poster is untrusted.


I sincerely doubt Jorge is misrepresenting himself and I know he's not stupid. What he is doing is pontificating and prognosticating out of his field. Economics is the pariah of academia and not completely without reason. Jorge is like the Noam Chomsky of Bitcoin, but that may be giving him too much credit. At least he has a hypothesis and he's testing it.

Economics and TA are similar in that people who don't know the discipline dismiss it as not a valid field. We would never do this with physics, chemistry or even social sciences like etymology or history. Jorge is making a common mistake. It's not more complicated or nefarious than that.



1456. Post 6285427 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 18, 2014, 06:27:28 PM

I think that you are giving him WAY TOO MUCH credit, if you are calling him the Noam Chomsky of Bitcoin - without getting too much into Noam Chomsky.  Chomsky has dabbled successfully in a large number of academic and political fields.

I would characterize Jorge's involvement in this bitcoin dialogue more like a rock star commenting on politics.  Sure the rock star is going to know some things about politics, but his/her opinion is NOT any better than the rest of the people - even though the rockstar gets a lot of credit and exposure b/c of his/her status as a rockstar.... even though s/he may be talking out of his/her ass about an opinion that is NOT much different from Joe Blow, off of the street.

So Jorge has been attempting to unfairly bring his rockstar status to this debate to add credibility to his bs... but it gets worse b/c some of the times, unlike a rock star, Jorge seems to be engaging in purposefully misleading approaches... it is NOT innocent opinions but deceptive portrayals... b/c it is pretty clearly that reasonable inferences from the evidence is that he knows better.


Chomski is a linguistics expert and a very good one. It's his dabbling that I have great qualms with. The danger with smart people is that we can reason better, but we can also rationalize better and there's fewer people to call us on our bullshit. I try to have a healthy respect for my own ability to rationalize. If I have an edge, that is it. An academic has tenure, and an author's incentive is to sell books and be influential. Self-awareness is a liability to them. I believe in incentives.



1457. Post 6286400 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on April 18, 2014, 08:00:37 PM

Odd that we don't see you here all the times you guess wrong...

When did I guess wrong? That is my first prediction thread ever as far as I know...It's also the first time I've published my opinion online (GeekCipher).

Where have you been, Cipher? Nearly a month missing from your own "analysis" thread.

It's odd we don't see you here now that you were so incredibly far off the mark with your random price guesses. I'm sorry, I meant "math." That's what you claimed to use, right, when Arepo inquired about your prediction?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=518871.msg5816338#msg5816338

I mean you assured us we'd only drop to $580 in March (maybe 550 at lowest), not $450 as we did. Your price acumen also led us to believe we'd see $694 on 4/16 -- why are we at $480? At nearly $220 off the mark that means you're wrong by roughly 45%! Eekgads, man. I guess it's back to peddling stolen software codes and other fishy Bitcoin enterprises...

Here is the post I originally wrote to you but did not submit because I wanted to give you some rope... Enjoy! (imagine this post starts with you asking, "When did I guess wrong?")

-----
You haven't given it enough time yet. You understand humans don't know the future, right? Being correct once or twice or even 3 times about a future event doesn't mean you know anything more about the future than my 3-year old niece or my pet dog. It may make you observant. It may make you fortunate. It doesn't make you future gnostic. Fortunately for your efforts humans are superstitious.

You made the prediction a day ago. I think most people here are assuming it looked like there would be a drop of up to $20-$100 and then believe it'll rise. You didn't exactly go out on a limb. But of course the first thing you do on the drop, to gain trust, is jump into a thread you do not participate in and declare your genius to the world. Your post history has nearly ZERO price prediction before yesterday.

Look, whatever scam you're up to just hasn't played out yet. You're involved in every scammy/scummy Bitcoin enterprise in existence. It is leading to only one end, and that is you running with other people's BTC without them receiving whatever you promised. The community doesn't need any more of YOU.

Seriously, you're selling gift cards, used electronics (oh, by the way you declared you're starting a "bitcoin museum" and are looking for stuff "super cheap"), video game codes, ASIC hosting (how generous of you), hashing power payouts, prognostication services (preparing to sell this, or just driving people to your awesome WP site?), buying used Casascius coins "for fun", etc. You are a walking scam waiting to explode.

You're in the "gaining trust" phase either for a bigger event or waiting to see which smaller scam offers quickest/biggest returns, have likely scammed others in the past (or perhaps you're a young gamer and burgeoning thief?), and are ready to move into the phase where you either start taking payments for pyramids, fortune telling services or start selling more expensive stuff that never arrives.

Or perhaps how long until folks realize their "hosted" machines are supplying the "hashing power" you're selling? You posted in January 2014: "I absolutely LOVE your setup! now to find a datacenter to host some of my miners.." Yet you now offer hosting services yourself? What are you, a Joe Blow reseller who has magically found a way to make ROI on miner hosting? You're probably running a bunch of smaller varying scam setups waiting to see which one begins to pay out the most more quickly.

But you should thank me for this post. Something like it gets posted in the lifetime of every scammer. Unfortunately it causes the dumbest humans to defend you because it does actually appear you haven't scammed anyone yet or haven't been caught. Congrats on that. We wouldn't want to jump to any conclusions about you. So for now, everyone can pile on me and tell me what a terrible human I am. I mean, you're just an entrepreneur, trying to make a buck, right?
-----

BOOM goes the dynamite!  I don't know that guy from Jack, but I love a good verbal beat down and that qualifies. Keyser is Verbal, kint you get it?



1458. Post 6287107 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: windjc on April 18, 2014, 08:38:25 PM
I just do not see a difference between March and now. We tested the high range of the trendline then we corrected. In March, there just was not enough fiat to keep the market up and we drifted down. News/snooze - there simply was not enough fiat coming in to the keep the market up. Now with Chinese regulations tightening, the squeeze has made it more difficult for fresh fiat to come in.

IF WE DO NOT RECOVER TO NEW HIGHS IN THE NEXT 10 days, then we are going down folks. We are going back down to retest 340.  It might take 2 months and it might be boring as hell, but the market is still in a bear market as of now and it has shown the inability to sustain prices at these levels. These are just the facts jack as they are today.

If we can get over $545 sometime in April, then thats another story altogether. But right now, I just see a slow drip drip drip down.

Everybody is looking for more upside after this correction. We tested the 50% Fib. Only the 68% is left. We are now on the clock to make an up move. And we need VOLUME to do it.

Shorts are at a very low level right now. Most margin is long.

My money is on the intermediate term bear.

Let me start off by saying I agree with you, not just in sentiment but in position. Having said that, it might be helpful to explore reasons why we could be wrong.

1) Weather. Spring weather historically provides a psychological lift to the markets, especially after a long cold winter and a rough bear market.
2) US tax returns. Many people have or will shortly have some disposable income.
3) China. Although the Middle Kingdom is my chief concern right now, much of the bad news so far has been priced in.
4) Although there is not any evidence of significant amounts of fiat entering the exchanges, there is not yet much evidence of fiat leaving the exchanges either. People who sold ~$550 could be looking to rebuy lower.
5) We don't need additional demand if supply runs out for some reason. Several scenarios are possible, although none of them are likely.
6) Prices are still below the cost of production. Well-funded miners should be buying.



1459. Post 6288671 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Paycheck Friday looking pretty boring so far. Let's start a rumor that Karpeles is now a supervillain living in Fukashima and demanding a million BTC ransom or he'll flood Tokyo with radioactive frappuccino.



1460. Post 6289826 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on April 19, 2014, 12:22:14 AM
From George Papageorgiou and Øystein Aaby, former top employees of Neo & Bee
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/23cjd9/the_full_picture_of_former_neo_bee_employees/

In Antonopoulos' response I find it interesting he says, "I will continue to advocate for security controls rather than trust in individuals." This really drives a stake into the heart of Bitcoin philosophy which is something like, "Trust in math and individuals rather than the relative security of banks."
http://antonopoulos.com/2014/04/18/neo-bee-a-statement-by-andreas-m-antonopoulos-a-consultants-perspective/

We have banks because even though they do naughty things from time to time, they are relatively secure whereas individuals are not. Perhaps recently banks have begun to wear out their welcome by overstepping but we shouldn't forget life is about balance. Perhaps Bitcoin won't replace banks but will find a role in keeping banks from being so overbearing.

As long as people are getting 0-1% interest on cash holdings.. that the banks can then loan out.. and in theory fractionally reserve style. Just because there hasn't been a bank run since the depression cause they probably figured out the majority of the controls to stop that form happening following that...and accompany that along with laws that prevent banks runs in America.. we don't really know how trust worthy Banks are.

I mean the taxpayers bailed out the richest fuck ups in the last crisis lol... banks.. safer.. pshhhhhh

Banks now pool risk through deposit insurance. I think this is a terrible idea. Instead of getting bank runs, there is the risk of a run on the entire banking system at once. This came perilously close to happening in 2008. It is closer than you might think to happening in China now.



1461. Post 6289969 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on April 19, 2014, 02:01:48 AM
. Also, have you not noticed Bitcoin's deflation since November?

You mean that the exchange rate has declined.  I am sure that you are aware that this was widely anticipated.  Ross Ulbricht did not secure his funds adequately to the risks he encountered.

I mean the value of Bitcoin went down, just as the dollar does when it inflates. Whether it is anticipated or not has no bearing on your original claim. Same with whether Ross secured his funds properly or not. You know this. You're not stupid. You simply have rhetoric that you don't want to back away from. Some might call that disingenuous, especially since you're smart enough to realize your mistake.




Keyser's on a rampage. We're a long way off from mass consumer adoption. There needs to be some key markets that we need to capture first. It might even be better to make it more exclusive. You know, something like "Bitcoin, for people smarter than you".



1462. Post 6290785 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on April 19, 2014, 03:32:22 AM
We have banks because even though they do naughty things from time to time, they are relatively secure whereas individuals are not. Perhaps recently banks have begun to wear out their welcome by overstepping but we shouldn't forget life is about balance. Perhaps Bitcoin won't replace banks but will find a role in keeping banks from being so overbearing.

the banks just ass-raped society for trillions and the best you can up with is "naughty banks" ... "recently worn out their welcome" ... "overbearing" ... ??!!

yeah like a thief in your house was naughty and wore out his welcome and was overbearing ... sheeeesh, get some perspective, you got fucked over by the banks, all of you and it is on-going, grow a pair and accept the reality of your abusive sub-ordination.

Some might say I am the one with perspective. Not in this nuthouse forum however.

Pretty much a bankers entire job is making sure that the money they lend out gets paid back. They failed at this. It wasn't even their money. So why did the creditors get bailed out and not the debtors?  It's not just the 2008 bail-outs. That was a symptom. Bankers have the system rigged so it's heads they win, tails we lose. They own the political system. They almost brought down the entire world economy and not a single one of them went to jail. 

We can't save because interest rates are lower than the real rate of inflation, so we are forced to speculate. Where is the balance?



1463. Post 6290922 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: windjc on April 19, 2014, 04:31:18 AM
Finex acting like it is tired of going down. Houbi now consistently 5 points lower.

Who leads? Stamp, BTC-e, China, but never bfx.



1464. Post 6304038 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on April 19, 2014, 08:03:41 AM
nano did fuck all.....

her husband must be furious!


I bought at 355, I sold at 420. I bought at 405, I sold at 520. I bought at 488, shorted at 490. now I have bought at 484. You will find evidence for all these if you care to look.

Nano took a lot of time to carefully go through and unmask your delusion multiple times in a dandy little timeline. It was gift from her to us. She practically put a li'l red bow on it. I'm not going to bother with it again when the truth is clear. All we need is for you begin deliriously shouting at us that you've "called the bottom" when you have done no such thing and we'll rename you BJAllen. You two can Indian Leg Wrestle over who needs the most attention.

That seems rather uncharitable, but with the way you've been using your keyboard like a truncheon, I suppose I should have expected to take my turn on the receiving end.



1465. Post 6304650 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

I'm just not impressed by the volume of this rally. This could still very easily be a repeat of  March, only this time $400 support has been broken, and we don't have the certainty that we had then that the realization of our worst fear (the closure of a major exchange) is behind us.

I said two days ago that ~$475 was retracement territory and if we were going to have another major push upwards, it would be from there. So far the push has been pretty underwhelming. I'm guessing Friday's paychecks have mostly been spent by now and Easter will be a time for profit taking and the celebration of an entirely different kind of resurrection.

What am I missing? We haven't had a crash in over a week and China hasn't declared bitcoin ownership a capital crime yet? What is the basis for this new found optimism? This thread's like a bunch of manic depressives off of their lithium. Since I don't read Chinese and my TA skills are limited, perhaps someone could enlighten me.



1466. Post 6321919 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

So price is down more than 10% in a week. Volume is low. It appears that panic buying is a low probability outcome.



1467. Post 6324844 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: niothor on April 21, 2014, 03:27:52 PM
Actually some people pay tax on their gains on BTC , interesting Smiley
Sometimes is indeed nice to live in a messed up country , just like mine. (And still be part of the EU).
Bulgaria?

Romania Smiley. But you were very close.

The two additions to the EU I could not for the light of me comprehend Tongue

From my point of view , the people who allowed .ro to join the EU were pretty stupid , with a lot of bone in their heads.
But , it's too late for that Smiley.

Still if you want a heaven for bitcoin taxation and you can live with the dogs,holes,whores, and so on ..romania is for you Smiley

And vampires, of course. and gypsies. Sexiest girl I ever met online was a German speaking chick from Romania.



1468. Post 6325086 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Huobi has a dip and everybody follows like lovesick puppies. Everybody is still following China and I don't see a sustainable reversal until that is no longer the case. The Chinese are broke and they just don't know it yet. Their banking system is a mess.



1469. Post 6325341 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on April 21, 2014, 04:46:45 PM
And vampires, of course. and gypsies. Sexiest girl I ever met online was a German speaking chick from Romania.

BillyJoe, sind Sie das? Ich bin so froh, dass Sie unsere Gespräche genossen!

I've known her for years, Dude. Gimme a little credit.



1470. Post 6325921 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on April 21, 2014, 05:17:18 PM
..Bilder oder nicht passiert.

(LOL just messing w/ Keyser  Kiss)


Cool

fucking comedians.   



1471. Post 6326055 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on April 21, 2014, 05:42:43 PM
The globe in economic crisis. Revolutionary programmable money on the rise. Full planes disappearing without a trace. Landslides. Ukraine on the verge of war. Tsunamis. Somali pirates taking ships. Legalization of pot in U.S.

Top stories on CNN?
"American wins American foot race"
"Royals visit zoo"

The problems isn't that Americans don't care about the world. The problem is that TV news is for idiots.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ee_uujKuJMI



1472. Post 6328948 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

I'm wondering why the $15-$18 price differential between Stamp and BTC-e. I am guessing the Russians have a better understanding of the China situation than The West has.

I'm sick of the bear market too, but I doubt it's over just because I want it to be.



1473. Post 6329153 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: John999 on April 21, 2014, 09:26:35 PM
Interesting article about bitcoin from Jim rickards

http://www.darientimes.com/30773/rickards-bitcoin-meets-the-taxman/

Fatal flaw:

Quote
One solution to the bitcoin volatility problem is to link bitcoin to gold at a fixed rate. This would require consensus in the bitcoin community and a sponsor willing to make a market in physical gold at the agreed value in bitcoin. This kind of gold-backed bitcoin might even give the dollar a run for its money as a reserve currency, especially if it were supported by gold powers such as Russia and China who are looking for ways out of the current system of dollar hegemon

Price fixing gold or bitcoin is a terrible idea. It would lead to surpluses or shortages. The value of gold relative to bitcoin is not only unknown but unknowable.



1474. Post 6329739 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on April 21, 2014, 10:12:24 PM
I'm wondering why the $15-$18 price differential between Stamp and BTC-e. I am guessing the Russians have a better understanding of the China situation than The West has.

I'm sick of the bear market too, but I doubt it's over just because I want it to be.


 BTCe is a ghetto 'sideline/secondary option' exchange & the prices reflect it (their website's GUI looks pretty uninviting as well =/) - guess people dump harder on there to be on the safe side from near-anonymous owners.

 Folks here'd do well to be aware that these manipulators have enough resources & income to keep this rodeo going on for months if not years.. One doesn't handle this intelligently by 'waiting it out' & relying on 'hope' ; Keeping at least a small portion of your stash into a trading acct to buy around high 300's & 200's, and sell around 500's & 600's, is how one keeps making some very respectable, safe profit month after month, increasing total crypto net worth over time while using this activity churn as a psychological bulwark to responsibly handling the loooong potential wait before next ATH w/o depression or panic.

Suggesting people should trade during this China thing is the worst advise you can give. Out of 10 people who take your advise at least 8 will lose their money.

It might be possible to guess what the manipulators are doing and piggy-back on their manipulation, but it would be dangerous.



1475. Post 6329917 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on April 21, 2014, 10:23:30 PM
If you bought Bitcoin a year ago would you have made a profit or not? How about a year before that? I guess the thing to do is buy as much as you can afford right now and come back next year to tell the story of your great success.

You would have made only a paper profit. You have to SELL to have a real profit.



1476. Post 6331974 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: Raystonn on April 21, 2014, 11:24:45 PM
If you bought Bitcoin a year ago would you have made a profit or not? How about a year before that? I guess the thing to do is buy as much as you can afford right now and come back next year to tell the story of your great success.

You would have made only a paper profit. You have to SELL to have a real profit.

Are you calling Bitcoin paper?  You want him to sell his BTC for paper U.S. dollars to avoid his profit being paper?


a bitcoin or any other monetary unit is only worth what you can trade for it, whatever a willing buyer and seller agree on. valuations change. Value is determined at the point of exchange.



1477. Post 6333228 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: shmadz on April 22, 2014, 05:18:23 AM
we are lacking sufficient buy support for a strong rally ATM though.  It's weird though how all the buys just come out of the wood works when prices start climbing.   I know there is a lot of cash waiting on the sidelines, but it is truly amazing how quickly it all floods in...

ahh, keithers, I think I remember you from the ole days, but now my memories are fading,

one thing seems consistent, that cash on the sidelines always seems to flood in when you're least expecting it...

The only people I know with a lot of cash made it from selling. so why the hell would they buy back unless the price drops?



1478. Post 6364508 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on April 23, 2014, 06:13:33 PM


We have the advantage of seeing volume. If we get a double bottom on high volume, I'll buy my ass off. That hasn't happened yet.



1479. Post 6370614 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Without new investors/ speculators, we're just taking each other's money and paying trading fees/taxes. A big red candle seems more likely than a big green one in the near future. Influx of new capital would come from where, exactly? Lots of possibilities, no probability.



1480. Post 6370909 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 24, 2014, 11:55:55 AM
Why would the mtgox news cause a price increase? It's basically the worst possible outcome - mtgox isn't coming back and 200,000 coins are being liquidated into cash.

Check out the thread I started in Bitcoin Discussion, apparently it should have no effect at all and in fact should cause an increase in price due to people receiving their compensation and buying BTC with it...

+1-1=0

what is really exciting about the liquidation is that some big investors that are not confident dealing with unregulated exchanges might bid the price higher than market (if coins are auctioned). that would be HUGE and speculators would have a field day.

It would be extremely smart to buy 200k coins over the market price, during an downward trend and while there is no information whatsoever about the fate of the remaining 600k missing coins.
I think that somekind of an award should be given for this investment decision.

yeah it would, just you try buying 200k coins at market price....... (not gonna happen) keep in mind that large investor money is not on the exchanges because they cannot be trusted.

You wouldn't buy something over the market price, that's value is dropping and there is no certainty about the future. It would be an very bad investment decision.

I strongly agree with the last part! But remember that the exchanges are also giving monetary value to bitcoin. Without the exchanges, bitcoin wouldn't have value and would just be a fun play money. And if the exchanges can't be trusted, then the value of bitcoin can't be trusted. That is why the price is dropping, because of the loss of trust from the general public, and people don't want to buy something that is very fragile in keeping value. The 600k missing goxcoins + all the coins from the past that have been stolen or scammed, are making bitcoin an very dangerous investment. There is always a possibility in the air that the price could drop to single digits or less in a matter of hours, and there is no way of managing this risk.

so you are a large investor, and you want 200k bitcoins. somebody else bids $500 at market price. are you going to let those coins get away? or that's ok, just place a 200k buy order at bitstamp @500? if somebody else bids market price for those coins, chances are that's the last shot you will EVER have at buying 200k coins. maybe you should bid $550.

If I was a large investor, I would attempt to contact as many large holders and miners as I could and go price shopping. I would attempt to get sellers to bid against each other. I have had more than one person contact me with offers to buy a big chunk of my stash, none of them have ever offered more than market value. Prices offered ranged from ~20% under market to about half price.



1481. Post 6377572 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 24, 2014, 06:00:57 PM
i have a really good feeling that we will be at 493 in the next few minutes

Feelings are an evolutionary artifact. They are unreliable.



1482. Post 6378573 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 24, 2014, 07:49:31 PM
i have a really good feeling that we will be at 493 in the next few minutes

Feelings are an evolutionary artifact. They are unreliable.

So is logic.  Also unreliable.


Incorrect. If your premises and your reasoning is correct, then your conclusion must be correct. Praxeology is based on this principle.



1483. Post 6378718 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

This latest little boost does not appear to have originated in China. It seems clear to me that the overall market wants to move up but expects some serious red candle news from China that is preventing a full recovery.  



1484. Post 6378811 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 24, 2014, 08:12:20 PM
Feelings are an evolutionary artifact. They are unreliable.
So is logic.  Also unreliable.
Incorrect. If your premises and your reasoning is correct, then your conclusion must be correct. Praxeology is based on this principle.
[/quote]

But your premises and your reasoning cannot be correct, if all you have is a meat computer.

[/quote]

Then your offer to reason for bitcoin doesn't appear to be an attractive proposition.



1485. Post 6379066 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 24, 2014, 08:24:03 PM
your premises and your reasoning cannot be correct, if all you have is a meat computer.
Then your offer to reason for bitcoin doesn't appear to be an attractive proposition.
Less wrong is generally good enough.  Also, I have crafted some prostheses which give me superhuman powers in certain limited domains.


Me too. A chief fallibility of meat computers is bias. I actively attempt to identify and negate my own bias. I don't have to be very successful at this to gain an advantage. I just just have to be relatively more successful than those I compete with.

What are your prostheses?



1486. Post 6384163 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

So, March again. You guys didn't really fall for the same thing 2 months in a row, did you?



1487. Post 6385324 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 25, 2014, 05:20:13 AM
here's a question,

why doesn't this get more play around here?

http://www.cnet.com/news/mt-gox-liquidation-given-go-ahead-by-tokyo-court/

this effectively means that any and all assets of value will be sold to make a pile of money for the lawyers and accountants and all them,

I would see this as cheap bitcoin flooding the market, but I have sometimes been know to see things which are not there.

Not that it is much of my business, but...

...why is there no discussion anywhere that the BTC given to Mt.Gox for safekeeping are not that company's assets, nor loans to it? They belong to the customers as customer property (or customer funds). In liquidation, the customer property is returned to its owner and not commingled with company assets nor used to pay its lawyers. If the guardian has failed with safekeeping so that a part of the property is stolen, the loss should be prorated, especially if there is no mention in TOS.

Actually it is my business (point: III). I decided to mention this once in every 500 posts.


Lawyers make the rules. The coins and fiat at Gox are debts like any others, I'm afraid. That hurts me too. I didn't get everything out before it imploded. Just most of it.



1488. Post 6399689 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

The only people buying now are people who sold higher. Look at the volume. Volume tells the story. We are very likely just at a consolidation stage on a trip back down. Don't get caught on the wrong side of the is/ought divide. China matters until it doesn't. Just because prices are stupid low doesn't mean they can't get stupider lower. Markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent if you don't manage your capital wisely.

There are silver linings. The good news is that the FBI will probably not get much for their coins. When the Chinese people will discover in a year or two from now how badly the PBoC and their government screwed them out of a leadership roll in crypto, it  may do more to foment revolution than Tienanmen Square.


Be smart. Be patient, and be in a position to scoop up bargains should they materialize.




1489. Post 6399889 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on April 26, 2014, 12:41:04 AM
The only people buying now are people who sold higher. Look at the volume. Volume tells the story. We are very likely just at a consolidation stage on a trip back down. Don't get caught on the wrong side of the is/ought divide. China matters until it doesn't. Just because prices are stupid low doesn't mean they can't get stupider lower. Markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent if you don't manage your capital wisely.

There are silver linings. The good news is that the FBI will probably not get much for their coins. When the Chinese people will discover in a year or two from now how badly the PBoC and their government screwed them out of a leadership roll in crypto, it  may do more to foment revolution than Tienanmen Square.


Be smart. Be patient, and be in a position to scoop up bargains should they materialize.



You are basically advocating the following:

* Some guy on the street is selling a $100 note (guaranteed to be non-counterfeit) for $10
* You tell your friend who wants to buy: No don't buy it. He might sell it for $5 if we wait a little bit!

And then if the friend buys it anyway and the man is indeed selling the $100 bill for $5 the next day you mock him.

It's not really relevant price can go lower unless you use margin

or unless it's money you are going to need for other purposes before the market recovers. It is unknown how long it will take before the market recovers. A prudent investor or speculator will price in risk. I am a Bitcoin true believer, but what Bitcoin needs most now are smart day traders to reduce volatility, and absorb/provide liquidity to make our crypto more useful for something other than speculation. The market incentives are there. We just need to be smart enough to take advantage of them.

If you can afford to hold for a prolonged period of time, buy now. Buy your ass off. If you cannot afford to hold for a prolonged period of time, wait until the price is lower. Missing the train is not the end of the world. There's always another train.



1490. Post 6414964 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Happy days are here again why exactly? I really want to know. What has changed?

I think it's improbable that China is done fucking the world markets until it shoots its wad right in Bitstamp's butthole. We have at least 3 potential goxxings on our hands because Huobi, BTC China and OK Coin are all sketchy volume-faking exchanges with very limited and diminishing sources of deposits. It doesn't matter if it's their fault or the PBoC or someone else. These exchanges are likely going to wither and die, crash out or go offshore.  Markets will be rattled and you can either be in a position to profit, ride out the storm or get caught with your pants down.

China is a 50 ton battleship anchor on BTC price and will continue to be until the chain is broken. That doesn't make me happy, but pretending significant negative factors don't exist makes for poor investment strategy. So if there is something good that outweighs this Chinese clusterfuck, I'd love to hear about it, but don't tell me it isn't real or it's irrelevant.



1491. Post 6416289 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 27, 2014, 03:04:21 AM
Happy days are here again why exactly? I really want to know. What has changed?

I think it's improbable that China is done fucking the world markets until it shoots its wad right in Bitstamp's butthole. We have at least 3 potential goxxings on our hands because Huobi, BTC China and OK Coin are all sketchy volume-faking exchanges with very limited and diminishing sources of deposits. It doesn't matter if it's their fault or the PBoC or someone else. These exchanges are likely going to wither and die, crash out or go offshore.  Markets will be rattled and you can either be in a position to profit, ride out the storm or get caught with your pants down.

China is a 50 ton battleship anchor on BTC price and will continue to be until the chain is broken. That doesn't make me happy, but pretending significant negative factors don't exist makes for poor investment strategy. So if there is something good that outweighs this Chinese clusterfuck, I'd love to hear about it, but don't tell me it isn't real or it's irrelevant.


So, if you were a betting man, you would be siding with Windjc about the $435 in the next 30 days?  or do you believe the downfall and FUD spreading of china is gonna last longer than 30 days?

I agree with you that China remains a relevant factor.. and will continue to be a relevant factor, until some other more relevant factor drowns it out.. such as major investment entering into the market (pie in the sky?  does NOT seem to be a long shot)...The existence of these three Fud-spreading China exchanges does seem rife for some kind of a GOX-like scandal, though.

Every trader is a betting man (or woman). Yeah, I think we have to go down before we can go sustainably up. I could very easily be wrong, but unless some billionaire bidding war breaks out, it seems unlikely we're gonna see much retail enthusiasm until The China situation is settled one way or another.



1492. Post 6416560 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 27, 2014, 04:48:46 AM
After about 400 more coins are moved on Huobi, I expect another influx of 1000-2000 coin bids.  All it takes is two non-cooperating arbitrageurs in order to insure that Huobi is always about 10 USD below stamp, as long as it remains infeasible for the general customer to deposit funds.  That can continue until the offers stop.  When the external volume on Huobi is less than that on stamp (not the churn, the trading volume reported, but the fiatleak numbers), it will cease to lead the price.  The China problem may be over long before anyone really is expecting it to be over.



So you seem to agree that Huobi is dying. What happens when it flat-lines? bang zoom to the moon immediately or a sharp dip before liftoff like with Silk Road and Gox? I think a sharp dip is probable. What's worse is that the longer it lives, the lower the price is likely to sink before that last. sharp. dip.



1493. Post 6430330 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 27, 2014, 07:30:47 PM
Dat wall at 435 has scared everybody for like 3 hours already  Shocked

A movie can scare people for three hours. Three hours is nothing. It's a speed bump on the road to $400.  What is not scaring anybody now is fear of missing the train. That's what you should be concerned about.



1494. Post 6431060 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: TeeBone on April 28, 2014, 12:53:46 AM
Who is willing to call a bottom?

I'd say we going to at least 382.

Me thinks 400 and 380 wont put up much of a fight. The war is at 340, if that gets taken out say hello to 266.

I agree with you IF China plays out as expected.



1495. Post 6432609 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 28, 2014, 04:02:12 AM
Good news! NO FUD.

BTCChina:

http://www.weibo.com/2149945883/B1MStEjN0?mod=weibotime

Quote
Small partners about bitcoin China suspended all news withdrawals are false news Bitcoin Chinese recharge and withdrawals everything is normal. If you need help, please call customer service phone 400-664-3033



A chinese guy on tradingview chat was telling me this yesterday. a lot of chinese are not concerned at all - after all, the chinese have declared that they cant ban it, dont have the authority to ban it, and dont wish to ban it. There will be a loop hole in the system for deposits somewhere. ill bet on it, seems like the chinese think so.

thanks for posting.

China needs to die before the bull market can resume. The reason is simple: A China market that is still alive can die. A China market that is dead cannot die because it is already dead. That sucks for the Chinese traders and investors. Blame the PBoC if you like, but it's the truth.



1496. Post 6432841 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 28, 2014, 04:20:47 AM
Good news! NO FUD.

BTCChina:

http://www.weibo.com/2149945883/B1MStEjN0?mod=weibotime

Quote
Small partners about bitcoin China suspended all news withdrawals are false news Bitcoin Chinese recharge and withdrawals everything is normal. If you need help, please call customer service phone 400-664-3033



A chinese guy on tradingview chat was telling me this yesterday. a lot of chinese are not concerned at all - after all, the chinese have declared that they cant ban it, dont have the authority to ban it, and dont wish to ban it. There will be a loop hole in the system for deposits somewhere. ill bet on it, seems like the chinese think so.

thanks for posting.

China needs to die before the bull market can resume. The reason is simple: A China market that is still alive can die. A China market that is dead cannot die because it is already dead. That sucks for the Chinese traders and investors. Blame the PBoC if you like, but it's the truth.

the chinese govt is simply not simple. One word from the PBoC and the bull run resumes.

China is uncertainty. Markets hate uncertainty. Why is that so hard to grasp? Why is it so hard to accept?   



1497. Post 6433115 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 28, 2014, 04:43:27 AM
Good news! NO FUD.

BTCChina:

http://www.weibo.com/2149945883/B1MStEjN0?mod=weibotime

Quote
Small partners about bitcoin China suspended all news withdrawals are false news Bitcoin Chinese recharge and withdrawals everything is normal. If you need help, please call customer service phone 400-664-3033



A chinese guy on tradingview chat was telling me this yesterday. a lot of chinese are not concerned at all - after all, the chinese have declared that they cant ban it, dont have the authority to ban it, and dont wish to ban it. There will be a loop hole in the system for deposits somewhere. ill bet on it, seems like the chinese think so.

thanks for posting.

China needs to die before the bull market can resume. The reason is simple: A China market that is still alive can die. A China market that is dead cannot die because it is already dead. That sucks for the Chinese traders and investors. Blame the PBoC if you like, but it's the truth.

the chinese govt is simply not simple. One word from the PBoC and the bull run resumes.

China is uncertainty. Markets hate uncertainty. Why is that so hard to grasp? Why is it so hard to accept?   

markets hate uncertainty. chinese LOVE bitcoin.

what are you accusing me of? anything is possible. I dont have the crystal ball, though a lot of people enjoy accusing me of this.

It's true but useless to say anything is possible. What is probable?



1498. Post 6433654 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 28, 2014, 05:19:25 AM
Good news! NO FUD.

BTCChina:

http://www.weibo.com/2149945883/B1MStEjN0?mod=weibotime

Quote
Small partners about bitcoin China suspended all news withdrawals are false news Bitcoin Chinese recharge and withdrawals everything is normal. If you need help, please call customer service phone 400-664-3033



A chinese guy on tradingview chat was telling me this yesterday. a lot of chinese are not concerned at all - after all, the chinese have declared that they cant ban it, dont have the authority to ban it, and dont wish to ban it. There will be a loop hole in the system for deposits somewhere. ill bet on it, seems like the chinese think so.

thanks for posting.

China needs to die before the bull market can resume. The reason is simple: A China market that is still alive can die. A China market that is dead cannot die because it is already dead. That sucks for the Chinese traders and investors. Blame the PBoC if you like, but it's the truth.

the chinese govt is simply not simple. One word from the PBoC and the bull run resumes.

China is uncertainty. Markets hate uncertainty. Why is that so hard to grasp? Why is it so hard to accept?  

markets hate uncertainty. chinese LOVE bitcoin.

what are you accusing me of? anything is possible. I dont have the crystal ball, though a lot of people enjoy accusing me of this.

It's true but useless to say anything is possible. What is probable?

you are saying that it is uncertain, so we will probably fall. when markets are forward looking, Im gonna go right ahead and say thats a paradox. One word from the PBOC, and the bull is back.

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. Markets are forward looking, and I'm looking forward to buying coins at a lower price point, a point when I feel more confident that the downside is more priced in.



1499. Post 6437570 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 28, 2014, 07:07:18 AM
Without any prior introduction, I posted the following. Because no prior info was given, this must be treated as the sole expression of my wish:

Based on my research, I don't believe we will see 435 ever again (Bitstamp). If someone is willing to bet (I naturally expect much better than 1:1 for me), PM please.

Chart1 & Chart2.

This is just the 2013-7-18 again. No looking back (when you least expect it).

Keywords:
- (implicit) in BTC
- (implicit) long duration at least 3 months (to adequately model "ever")
- trigger condition breaching 435
- someone (anyone can take it!)
- send me PM
- much better than 1:1 odds for me

Windjc's proposal:

In 2014-3-30, the exponential trendline model gave a buy signal at $460 and the price has been unable to go below it for any extended time even after 4 weeks.

In 2013-11-23 it gave a sell signal at $872 (SlipperySlope's 0.40 confidence) or 2013-11-28 at $1,056 (my 0.45 confidence). It was also unable to stay above it for any extended time.

What odds do you want? As I would be betting to win less valuable coin, you shouldn't get much better than 50%.

I think you will offer an unreasonable bet so that you don't have to make one at all.

But let me know.
Unreasonable? It's $30 to the trigger line (was $20 when I first called it). Are you willing to give 1:1 odds to me that price will hit $495 some point in the future? Of course not, you would not take that even at 10:1. So don't expect the same of me.
Lol. You didn't even make an offer. Why am I not surprised?

Since you are too chicken s*** Wink to make a bet, here's one for you.

Bet $50k with of btc
Duration 30 days

If we hit 435 on Stamp and don't hit 500 I win.
If we hit 500 and not 435 you win
If we hit both or neither its a draw. And we both donate $1000 worth of btc each to charity.

Keywords:
- in USD
- short duration 30 days
- trigger condition breaching 435 and breaching 500, with both/neither considered a tie (windjc's estimation 90% this will end in a tie)
- aimed for me only, with insult
- public
- 1:1 odds, with charity clause

* *

EPILOGUE

It is difficult to read the thread because of so many posts, especially if you are of the type that never checks the sources and relies on people. But then you will also get the objectively wrong idea of what is happening. Here I wanted to have a nice private bet with anyone who thinks that breaking 435 is imminent and is willing to give me great odds for defending it. This windjc turned into a public challenge directed against me, with different terms in every 6 parameters that are important in a bet.

The bet itself seemed +EV for me so I decided to go on with it, but in the end there was not enough mutual agreement. As was perhaps the intention, windjc collected "fame" because I did not took his bet (why? do I also get points every time I propose things to people when it is not in their interest to comply?  Roll Eyes ).

In the meanwhile nobody took my bet (the one which i would have unequivocally lost last night). Nobody was even interested. I had estimated that probability for 435 holding should be 10% in general public's eyes, but I thought it was 20%. So I would have taken 7:1 odds for me, and lost almost straight away.

I don't care about the bet. We all bet every time we trade. It was a shitty prediction that was proven wrong in a day. You don't seem to even be embarrassed by it, but instead focus on Clintonesque wiggle room in your bet proposal. It was a laughably bad call. What have you learned from it? If you say nothing, then I have even less respect for you.



1500. Post 6438240 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 28, 2014, 12:13:46 PM


Quote
What have you learned from it?

That scenario thinking and probabilities are very hard to understand for many people, even in threads dedicated to it. Further education is necessary, but any serious and accountable predictions by anyone should be taken here, with a consistent and uniform methodology, and cash prizes (all entry fees go to the pot + my 1,000mBTC bounty and perhaps windjc's also..)

You're missing the point. The risk of dropping below $435 was much higher to many of us than it was to you. Your estimation was off. Those of us who thought the risk was higher than you thought it was had good reason to think so. You may have had good reason to think it would never go that low again, but it did go that low again

Your prediction was wrong. Why? Why did you fuck up? Why did you blow it? simply because the future is unknowable? Do you think we are just lucky idiots?

It's ok to get a call wrong. We all do. That's when we learn. Have you identified a way for your forecasting ability to be improved? Show some fucking humility, Man. You're bleeding credibility when you do shit like that. Quit defending yourself. It just makes you look worse.

People who might otherwise want to invest in Bitcoin will be reluctant to do so if they think it's going to enrich people of low moral character. If that was Jorge's point all along then I finally get it. You and I were smart for seeing early on the value of Bitcoin, but trading day trading is getting more sophisticated, more complicated and more difficult every day.  This community needs elder statesmen and you should be filling that roll instead of making reckless predictions and ego-driven bet proposals.



1501. Post 6438543 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: Erdogan on April 28, 2014, 12:45:33 PM


Hear, hear. He was not maybe the absolute, end of the game, forever, most genius around, but he certainly was more of a genius than those who did not buy at 10.



I DID buy @ $10. With everything I had. I just didn't have as much to start with.



1502. Post 6438803 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on April 28, 2014, 01:16:55 PM


Hear, hear. He was not maybe the absolute, end of the game, forever, most genius around, but he certainly was more of a genius than those who did not buy at 10.



I DID buy @ $10. With everything I had. I just didn't have as much to start with.

Why didn't you buy a castle yet?  Undecided

Honestly, any castle I could have afforded even when BTC was $1100 would not meet my standards. Real estate is still way overpriced in the U.S. IMHO, and it is usually a cash-flow drain.

A depreciating currency should encourage frugality, not Lamborghinis and castles. I still have a lot to learn about responsible capital management, but the necessity of prudent cash flow management should be obvious.

EDIT: I should have said deflationary currency. Although BTC has been depreciating lately, this bear market will end eventually.



1503. Post 6446774 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

The only reason to buy right now is if you think supply is going to dry up quickly. Otherwise tomorrow, next week or next month will suffice. You .might even get a discount.

I  just don't think supply is likely to dry up quickly, but I am willing to listen to arguments to the contrary.



1504. Post 6447129 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 28, 2014, 10:37:06 PM
The only reason to buy right now is if you think supply is going to dry up quickly. Otherwise tomorrow, next week or next month will suffice. You .might even get a discount.

I  just don't think supply is likely to dry up quickly, but I am willing to listen to arguments to the contrary.

I think SecondMarket is buying... will be interesting to check their holdings tomorow Smiley Or someone else, who is going long.

You do realize that it takes ~1.62 Million $/day to keep prices stable @ $450, right? How long can 2nd market or anyone else keep that up on their own?

Not all new coins enter the market, but old coins do enter and so over time it should roughly even out. It could just as easily be someone who sold at $500, $550 or higher buying back their own coins.  I'm looking for evidence of NEW buyers, and so far I haven't found any.



1505. Post 6447376 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on April 28, 2014, 11:13:56 PM
The only reason to buy right now is if you think supply is going to dry up quickly. Otherwise tomorrow, next week or next month will suffice. You .might even get a discount.

I  just don't think supply is likely to dry up quickly, but I am willing to listen to arguments to the contrary.

I think SecondMarket is buying... will be interesting to check their holdings tomorow Smiley Or someone else, who is going long.

You do realize that it takes ~1.62 Million $/day to keep prices stable @ $450, right? How long can 2nd market or anyone else keep that up on their own?

Not all new coins enter the market, but old coins do enter and so over time it should roughly even out. It could just as easily be someone who sold at $500, $550 or higher buying back their own coins.  I'm looking for evidence of NEW buyers, and so far I haven't found any.

Good point, by that logic that is less than 50 coins a day per exchange on average  

It wouldn't matter if it was only 5 coins. Fiat flow in has to be greater than fiat flow out for price to rise. Chinese fiat flow has slowed to a trickle with nothing obvious to replace it yet. The Chinese don't have to dump coins for the price to drop. They just have to stop buying them, and they ARE reducing purchases.



1506. Post 6447580 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on April 28, 2014, 11:34:13 PM
It wouldn't matter if it was only 5 coins. Fiat flow in has to be greater than fiat flow out for price to rise. Chinese fiat flow has slowed to a trickle with nothing obvious to replace it yet. The Chinese don't have to dump coins for the price to drop. They just have to stop buying them, and they ARE reducing purchases.

OK cheaper coins coming in, but not that I have $22,000 per day to invest, but that is not a lot of cash globally needed to come in to the average exchange to keep demand higher than production.
I'm banking supply dries up when AM gen3 chips are implemented and push up that difficulty.

It's not much cash at all, but it still has to come from somewhere. I can think of dozens of possibilities, but no probabilities.  Buying AM gen3 chips doesn't make any sense to me with BTC prices so much lower now than the cost of production. You'd get a much better ROI by buying coins themselves.



1507. Post 6447756 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: shmadz on April 29, 2014, 12:06:27 AM
The 30 min chart on Stamp is looking like a downward red staircase today...as much as I like cheap coins, I am anxious for a turnaround.

zoom out to the 6hr chart. To me it just looks like a series of lower highs and lower lows since January. And I see no signs of a turnaround any time soon. (not that bitcoin needs a reason).

From that chart it looks to me like we would at least need to re-test the 330-340 range on stamp before seriously turning around.

by the way, does anyone know the price that the Winklebros bought in at?

They claim they started buying in high double digits. I don't think there is a whole lot of respect for them on Wall Street and I doubt any major players are going to jump in until it's more obvious that Bitcoin is a self-sustaining phenomenon.   



1508. Post 6447789 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 29, 2014, 12:12:07 AM
its already turned around its just not Obvious yet.

VERY not obvious. at all. not even a little bit.



1509. Post 6448022 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: solex on April 29, 2014, 12:29:39 AM
The 30 min chart on Stamp is looking like a downward red staircase today...as much as I like cheap coins, I am anxious for a turnaround.

zoom out to the 6hr chart. To me it just looks like a series of lower highs and lower lows since January. And I see no signs of a turnaround any time soon. (not that bitcoin needs a reason).

From that chart it looks to me like we would at least need to re-test the 330-340 range on stamp before seriously turning around.

by the way, does anyone know the price that the Winklebros bought in at?

They claim they started buying in high double digits. I don't think there is a whole lot of respect for them on Wall Street and I doubt any major players are going to jump in until it's more obvious that Bitcoin is a self-sustaining phenomenon.   

I recall a YT interview which gave the impression a lot of their buying was around $10 to $12.

After doing more googling, it appears that you are most likely correct.



1510. Post 6448046 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: TERA on April 29, 2014, 12:45:16 AM
To clear any confusion, the "bounce" today was due to k8.com (Hyflux entertainment) buying about 40,000 BTC using international exchange
source?

ditto. source?



1511. Post 6448093 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 29, 2014, 12:49:13 AM
To clear any confusion, the "bounce" today was due to k8.com (Hyflux entertainment) buying about 40,000 BTC using international exchange

20k is whole orderbook of bitstamp... if they would buy 40k on exchanges we would be at 900$ minimum... any link to that news?


http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=zh-CN&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http://do.chinabyte.com/319/12935319.shtml&edit-text=

Fucking Google Translate is worthless. I have no idea what that means.



1512. Post 6448333 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: windjc on April 29, 2014, 01:12:32 AM
You guys can't find it?? It was posted on a bunch of China BTC news press

Original source:
http://news.hongzhoukan.com/14/0428/mr122254.html

Also found on:
http://www.btc38.com/btc/altgeneral/1542.html
http://www.bi126.com/Analysis/btc/2014-04-28/1086.html
http://business.chinadaily.com.cn/2014/0428/1386875.html
http://www.bit-sky.com/index.php/2013-12-16-02-19-33

Quote
Recently, reporters from Hyflux entertainment game's official website informed that the company recently completed a large international Bitcoin transaction again from the international trading market Bitcoin Bitcoin purchased twenty thousand again, coupled with previously acquired two pieces at the beginning of the bit currency, its total to forty thousand, equivalent to more than 120 million yuan.

Why is a gaming company buying 40k BTC?

If it was me, it would be to have BTC prizes, so I could lure in BTC gamblers.



1513. Post 6448420 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on April 29, 2014, 01:26:32 AM
cheap coins?
This will be so true at the end of 2016 it will be funny to read.

+1

As for right now, we definitely need to see another significant spike down before we see a spike up IMHO.



No we don't. People keep saying this over and over. At every price point possible. It's based on nothing.

It's based on Austrian Business Cycle Theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_business_cycle_theory  Bitcoins need to flow from the people who use them less productively to the people who use them more productively. You can't have sustainable growth when incompetents control all the capital.



1514. Post 6448657 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 29, 2014, 01:42:13 AM
It's based on Austrian Business Cycle Theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_business_cycle_theory  Bitcoins need to flow from the people who use them less productively to the people who use them more productively. You can't have sustainable growth when incompetents control all the capital.

Okay, now that's one of the most absurd misapplications of business cycle theory that I've ever seen.


Is it? Who owns the most Bitcoins right now? Capitalists with experience in wealth creation outside of Bitcoin? No. It's largely people like me who bought them by maxing out credit cards. So how do capitalists acquire capital? Do they enrich reckless speculators or wait until the speculators are forced to partially or completely liquidate? 

I'm not saying I know that a sufficient number of coins hasn't already changed hands. That's possible, but what's certain is that selling pressure continues until all the people with the need to sell have sold. The people with the need to sell are people with negative cash flow outside of Bitcoin appreciation.

Is your capital structured is such a way that time is your friend or your enemy? If you are positioned well, you shouldn't care if the market goes up down or sideways.



1515. Post 6448720 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: bitcoinsrus on April 29, 2014, 01:51:21 AM
Any thoughts on this one? News released today. This could crash the price hard. 385000BTC for $3M USD? what?

http://www.coindesk.com/us-government-sells-silk-road-users-seized-bitcoins-for-3-million/

"However, perhaps most interesting about the story is that the government has already sold more than $3m in the proceeds from Slomps’ crimes, Assistant US Attorney Randall Samborn told CoinDesk, though he declined to offer any further specifics about the sale."

I read the article to.  Its too short and mainly discusses the silk road scandal.  Even the comments show more interest in the selling.

I think they sold a portion of the coins (3 million worth).  I don't know if it was all, a fraction etc (most likely retail or close to retail since not much else is disclosed and (I base somewhat on the quote I added)

That is what is so frustrating. A major factor in recent price drops could be those coins being bought below market and dumped on the market, but without knowing how much has been sold, we don't know when the downward price pressure will end if it hasn't ended already.

EDIT: there is a less probable but remote possibility that the dumping hasn't even started yet.



1516. Post 6448858 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: y3804 on April 29, 2014, 02:03:26 AM
Any thoughts on this one? News released today. This could crash the price hard. 385000BTC for $3M USD? what?

http://www.coindesk.com/us-government-sells-silk-road-users-seized-bitcoins-for-3-million/

if they sold 380,000 btc for 3m, that would be $12 each. - must be a portion, or Im missing out on some seriously 'cheap coins'

Well it's unlikely that they will sell 380,000BTC for the full $173M they are worth. Someone will get cheap coins

Bitcoins are fungible, so even if they don't get dumped on the market, other coins that would have otherwise gone to the purchasers of the seized coins will get dumped on the market. Mathematically it is irrelevant if the result is selling pressure or lack of buying pressure. There is a downward price effect on the market either way.




1517. Post 6449723 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 29, 2014, 03:15:45 AM

I don't claim to be an expert in any of these various economic theories, but there seems to be some sense in what BJA is saying - apart from his having to feel some kind of irresistible urge to dish out insults regarding the competency and/or intelligence of regular people.

I do believe that the status quo wealthy will put up quite a bit of a battle in any redistribution of wealth attempts in order that redistribution of wealth is only minimum..

In other words the status quo wealthy use any tools at their disposal by hook or by crook to ensure that redistribution of wealth does NOT leave them hanging high and dry.  They may NOT be too successful with bitcoin b/c the train may leave some of them, but they are going to put up several obstacles along the way and secretly board at later stops.

I think it is quite possible bordering on probable that I am one of the incompetents I am referring to. It's not intended as an insult. It's just part of the theory.



1518. Post 6449895 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 29, 2014, 03:40:27 AM
It's based on Austrian Business Cycle Theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_business_cycle_theory  Bitcoins need to flow from the people who use them less productively to the people who use them more productively. You can't have sustainable growth when incompetents control all the capital.

Okay, now that's one of the most absurd misapplications of business cycle theory that I've ever seen.


Is it? Who owns the most Bitcoins right now? Capitalists with experience in wealth creation outside of Bitcoin? No. It's largely people like me who bought them by maxing out credit cards. So how do capitalists acquire capital? Do they enrich reckless speculators or wait until the speculators are forced to partially or completely liquidate? 

I'm not saying I know that a sufficient number of coins hasn't already changed hands. That's possible, but what's certain is that selling pressure continues until all the people with the need to sell have sold. The people with the need to sell are people with negative cash flow outside of Bitcoin appreciation.

Is your capital structured is such a way that time is your friend or your enemy? If you are positioned well, you shouldn't care if the market goes up down or sideways.


Hopefully you have learned by your own words that it is NOT good to be overly leveraged in BTC b/c that could cause BTC to transfer from your hands to the hands of others at a loss to you.  You frequently claim that you are NOT one of those people who get taken advantage of in the investment world.. but you als o assert that you are engaging in heavily leveraged behaviors.. which could come back to bite you in the butt if you are NOT careful.. ... accordingly, your butt will get burnt if you overly leverage in bitcoin and you are NOT able to manipulate prices.

Yes, I have learned at some expense. I have recouped my initial investment with enough profit to endure a prolonged bear market should it be necessary. The BTC I have in cold storage will have to be sufficient if an unexpected rally prevents me from adding to my holdings.



1519. Post 6450787 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: solex on April 29, 2014, 06:24:03 AM
Huobi is certainly on a little rip.  Any idea why?


Stamp too

Anyone all in fiat? Might get expensive..

It might, but $450 isn't any higher than we were 24 HRs ago. If you can trade these swings, more power to you. It looks like a big circle jerk to me.



1520. Post 6450853 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: TERA on April 29, 2014, 06:39:02 AM

It's irrelevant to the pump, that's for sure
I see 'lawyers and creditors have reached an agreement' - Are these really the people who had authority over the matter?

We do not need Gox back from the dead. We do not need China back from the dead. Amateur hour is supposed to be over. Zombie exchanges have the same effect on the bitcoin economy as zombie banks have in the fiat economy. Damoclesian swords over our heads.



1521. Post 6452580 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 29, 2014, 07:45:27 AM

I don't claim to be an expert in any of these various economic theories, but there seems to be some sense in what BJA is saying - apart from his having to feel some kind of irresistible urge to dish out insults regarding the competency and/or intelligence of regular people.

I do believe that the status quo wealthy will put up quite a bit of a battle in any redistribution of wealth attempts in order that redistribution of wealth is only minimum..

In other words the status quo wealthy use any tools at their disposal by hook or by crook to ensure that redistribution of wealth does NOT leave them hanging high and dry.  They may NOT be too successful with bitcoin b/c the train may leave some of them, but they are going to put up several obstacles along the way and secretly board at later stops.

I think it is quite possible bordering on probable that I am one of the incompetents I am referring to. It's not intended as an insult. It's just part of the theory.


Part of my issue, though, in your framing in competence and/or intelligence is that it seems to assume too much about the wealthy being competent or smart.  Just b/c someone has a lot of power and/or resources at his/her disposal and wants to engage in a large variety of strategies to maintain the status quo and to preserve that wealth and those resources does NOT mean that the person is smarter or more competent.. even though the one with the resources and wealth may win (in spite of not being smarter or more competent).



1522. Post 6452849 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 29, 2014, 07:45:27 AM

I don't claim to be an expert in any of these various economic theories, but there seems to be some sense in what BJA is saying - apart from his having to feel some kind of irresistible urge to dish out insults regarding the competency and/or intelligence of regular people.

I do believe that the status quo wealthy will put up quite a bit of a battle in any redistribution of wealth attempts in order that redistribution of wealth is only minimum..

In other words the status quo wealthy use any tools at their disposal by hook or by crook to ensure that redistribution of wealth does NOT leave them hanging high and dry.  They may NOT be too successful with bitcoin b/c the train may leave some of them, but they are going to put up several obstacles along the way and secretly board at later stops.

I think it is quite possible bordering on probable that I am one of the incompetents I am referring to. It's not intended as an insult. It's just part of the theory.


Part of my issue, though, in your framing in competence and/or intelligence is that it seems to assume too much about the wealthy being competent or smart.  Just b/c someone has a lot of power and/or resources at his/her disposal and wants to engage in a large variety of strategies to maintain the status quo and to preserve that wealth and those resources does NOT mean that the person is smarter or more competent.. even though the one with the resources and wealth may win (in spite of not being smarter or more competent).

It's not an issue of intelligence. It's an issue of knowledge. Wise management of capital is a specialized skill and not all wealthy people qualify. Austrian economists make a careful distinction between those who actually create wealth and those who acquire it through other means. We place a greater importance on the difference between makers and takers than on the difference between rich and poor. To us, the lowliest laborer makes a more valuable contribution to the economy than the greatest redistributionist. We may even oppose the status quo more than you do, but we see the political class as the greatest impediment to efficient markets.



1523. Post 6461724 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 29, 2014, 03:59:59 PM
Isn't it ironic that the libertarian bitcoiners, champions of laissez-faire capitalism, are betting all their life savings on the hope that the Satoshi Bitcoin will be one day the only cryptocurrency in the market, so that they can charge monopoly prices for it?  Wink

I'm not betting it will be the only cruptocurrency, just the most liquid one. Charging monopoly prices would prevent that from being the case. Competition is good.



1524. Post 6462290 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 29, 2014, 12:54:10 PM
Wise Shrewd management of capital is a specialized skill and not all almost no wealthy people qualify.

FTFY.  Lots of rich acquaintances here.  Maybe two who qualify as wise and manage their own capital.  Shrewd is much easier to find than wise, although they tend not to be my friends in that case; even then the proportion who either delegate or just burn down their capital is overwhelming.  Unless you are functionally insane, incentives tend to attenuate as wealth compounds.  Excellence in any area tends to require a level of incentive, drive, which becomes difficult to muster when there are so many pleasurable distractions readily available.  The ease of accumulation and the ease of distraction form something like a reaction-diffusion system, to my intuition, and demonstrate bifurcation dynamics.  Some very, very small fraction are able to establish homeostatic regimes conducive to dynastic continuations, but even those are very fragile to innovation and tail risks.
 

You language is more precise than mine. It's difficult to convey to outsiders how we think.  The knee-jerk deference to authority is so strong in them that there's not a lot of common ground to even begin to discuss our ideological differences. You would think that The Non-Aggression Principle would be fathomable even to those who don't accept it, but there seems to be some mental block that keeps resurfacing whenever you try to explain that the State is not some magical entity that can violate the rules of civilized behavior without consequence to society.



1525. Post 6462597 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: KFR on April 29, 2014, 06:29:30 PM
Isn't it ironic that the libertarian bitcoiners, champions of laissez-faire capitalism, are betting all their life savings on the hope that the Satoshi Bitcoin will be one day the only cryptocurrency in the market, so that they can charge monopoly prices for it?  Wink

Make sweeping generalisations, much? Tongue

I find this much more ironic:

Ridiculous. The only reason why most bitcoin crimes go unpunished and victims get no reparation is that bitcoin was appropriated by rabid "libertarians" who hate governments, law, regulations, and police.

The logical consequence of assuming that those things are evil is that "there are no criminals nor victims, only smart people and stupid people".

The invariable response of the "bitcoin community" to each new bitcoin scam or heist is "stupid victims, they should have blah blah blah."

Good to see you airing those "academic" prejudices a little more openly again, prof.  Have the high priests of the global Bitcoin conspiracy been getting to you again? Roll Eyes

The reason that some crimes involving Bitcoin have gone unpunished is because governments and regulators are slow to catch on to new technology.  Now, what's the reason for the lack of prosecutions with regard to massive fiat scandals?  Oh yes, the institutions are "too big to fail" and the individuals involved apparently can't themselves be held accountable either.  So that's fair.

Bitcoin could be your saviour but you're so terrified of some of its libertarian fans somehow taking complete control of this massive open-to-all consensus-based network that you'd rather dedicate your time to saving the world from those dangerous imaginary cultists in the most bizarre and fruitless way possible - trolling this thread.

If you want to try and change Bitcoin's direction, stop pushing back and start looking forward.  


I know it's much easier for you to tar us all with the same brush.  But life's not supposed to be so easy.

Libertarians do not have control of Bitcoin. Nobody has control of Bitcoin. As a libertarian, I like it this way. We don't even think in terms of who should hold centralized power. We are opposed to centralized power itself, no matter who holds it.





1526. Post 6463170 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: cbutters on April 29, 2014, 09:18:46 PM
Mexico needs bitcoin!
Don't worry guys, Carlos Slim will buy us up to 6000!

Slim is in a position to own the remittance market if he leveraged his control of TelCel in order to turn BTC into a Mexican version of the mpesa. He'll prolly think of that in a couple of years.



1527. Post 6468493 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: shmadz on April 30, 2014, 04:17:10 AM
Why is this not going below 400 or worse ? Here we are sitting like a rock at 440, which was unthinkable back in january.

Is there any genuine short-term bull case, besides rockets and slogans ?

I'm a tired bear, been at it for 5 months now, and tbh im worn out. I want to close my shorts, but i've gotta play the market. I see no reason to buy before May 10, and/or whatever deadline comes after that.

I'll be needing some Bull rehab after this is done.  Sad

The longest bear market was June-November 2011, some 163 days. The current downtrend is 151 days assuming it is still intact and did not bottom out at $339 which would be 132 days. So maybe the trend is as worn out as everyone watching it. Won't be obvious until a decisive breakout is seen which is a return to the $550-$600 area.

Time and depth lengths from trends of the distant past are proving again and again to be a bad way to analyze events in the present or predict events in the future.

agreed. you think this MIT thing is gonna flop as bad as auroracoin?

http://venturebeat.com/2014/04/29/mit-is-about-to-become-the-worlds-first-bitcoin-economy/

it will be interesting, bitcoin transactions are not that easy, and it would be funny if they all just cashed out for beers and eats at the local pub that accepts it (you know there will be at least one)

It's what I would do, back when I was in school  Grin

:edit: come to think of it, it's a pretty ballsy experiment. Throw half a million dollars worth of internet money at a bunch of young kids and see what happens.

auroracoin would seem to be a good comparison.



1528. Post 6468707 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on April 30, 2014, 05:45:15 AM
Why is this not going below 400 or worse ? Here we are sitting like a rock at 440, which was unthinkable back in january.

Is there any genuine short-term bull case, besides rockets and slogans ?

I'm a tired bear, been at it for 5 months now, and tbh im worn out. I want to close my shorts, but i've gotta play the market. I see no reason to buy before May 10, and/or whatever deadline comes after that.

I'll be needing some Bull rehab after this is done.  Sad

The longest bear market was June-November 2011, some 163 days. The current downtrend is 151 days assuming it is still intact and did not bottom out at $339 which would be 132 days. So maybe the trend is as worn out as everyone watching it. Won't be obvious until a decisive breakout is seen which is a return to the $550-$600 area.

Time and depth lengths from trends of the distant past are proving again and again to be a bad way to analyze events in the present or predict events in the future.

agreed. you think this MIT thing is gonna flop as bad as auroracoin?

http://venturebeat.com/2014/04/29/mit-is-about-to-become-the-worlds-first-bitcoin-economy/

it will be interesting, bitcoin transactions are not that easy, and it would be funny if they all just cashed out for beers and eats at the local pub that accepts it (you know there will be at least one)

It's what I would do, back when I was in school  Grin

:edit: come to think of it, it's a pretty ballsy experiment. Throw half a million dollars worth of internet money at a bunch of young kids and see what happens.

auroracoin would seem to be a good comparison.

This seems to be quite a comparison given the demographics of Iceland being that nearly 30% of its population is either over 65 or under 18 whereby decreasing the overall acceptance of an air drop. More importantly comparing a coin that was created and pre-mined exclusively for the air-drop, versus a group of engineers crowd-sourcing donations of an established virtual currency for a project that will likely reach a much larger subset of individuals than AUR has or ever will.

The most relevant fact to me is that people are being given crypto with monetary value and they aren't the ones paying for it. Human nature is such that we don't tend to value things we don't work for. This is why most lottery winners blow the money in a relatively short period of time and people who spend years saving money do not. 



1529. Post 6469097 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

aaand the dump. Who coulda possibly saw that coming?



1530. Post 6479294 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 30, 2014, 01:23:15 PM

It seems that most of them are in the US or "US-like" countries, so it cannot be freedom of speech, religion, travel, residence, association, study, dress, drink, sex, marriage, work, property, trade, investment, enterprise, and many other basic freedoms that the citizens of those countries enjoy to a higher degree than most other people in the world (and that bitcoin cannot do anything about anyway).

So, what exactly are those "freedoms" that the "libertarians" miss, and hope to get through bitcoin?



Freedom of association? You've never heard of "Affirmative action"? Residence? We can only live in areas that are zoned residential. Speech? This is why Bradley Manning is in supermax prison and Edward Snowden is being hunted like a war criminal? Sex? Prostitution is legal in a few counties in one state out of fifty. Travel? try driving without a license. try traveling without a passport.  Permission to travel is not freedom. Not needing permission is freedom. Religion? so Muslims and Fundamentalist Mormons can have multiple wives? Rastafarians can spark a joint in D.C.? Pacifists like Quakers and Mennonites don't have to pay taxes that fund wars?

I could go on and on. Most Germans in Nazi Germany thought they were free because all of the things that were banned were things they didn't want to do anyway. That's not freedom. Real freedom means freedom to be unpopular.



1531. Post 6479558 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: xulescu on April 30, 2014, 06:43:22 PM
I trust evolution.

I trust evolution to do what is in evolution's interest.  Incentives, after all.  Just need to figure out how to incentivize evolution to behave nicely.

Wisdom: 100% from concentrate

Incentives are EVERYTHING; people need to understand that they cannot assume everyone (most others) to be truthful and that if they align incentives in a game-theoretical setting everyone (each and all) is better off, with the exception of the parasites and the myopic, who are better off in a system that is so easy to game

Incentives are everything, but keep in mind that there is no such thing as cheating with natural selection. Genghis Khan's gene propagation strategy was successful as was the sperm bank donor with thousands of offspring. Civilization is an attempt at UNnatural selection. "Behaving nicely" is a completely relative concept.



1532. Post 6480543 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

trainspotting: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-04-30/train-derails-lynchburg-massive-fire-erupts-flames-stories-high



Thursday is traditional dump day. As it coincides with a commie holiday, we might see an early sale today. or a rally. I have no idea. Dyslexic workers of the world, Untie!



1533. Post 6481466 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 30, 2014, 09:06:29 PM
trainspotting: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-04-30/train-derails-lynchburg-massive-fire-erupts-flames-stories-high



Thursday is traditional dump day. As it coincides with a commie holiday, we might see an early sale today. or a rally. I have no idea. Dyslexic workers of the world, Untie!

I don't really like that word, "commie" b/c it seems to carry with it a lot of unnecessary baggage... maybe it is my own negative experience that is tainting my reaction?

It's an intentional pejorative. Collectivism is fine as long as it's voluntary, but it almost never is. Most collectivists explicitly aim to gain enough power to forcibly impose their policies on everyone. In the name of freedom, of course.



1534. Post 6485575 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: chessnut on May 01, 2014, 04:02:08 AM
ugh bears, there are relatively unlimited people to buy, and such limited amount of people to sell. the chinese will run out abruptly in the middle of your trend party.

"Abruptly?" evidence? You have made a bald assertion with nothing to back it up. Where else are Chinese miners going to sell?



1535. Post 6485720 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: chessnut on May 01, 2014, 04:21:30 AM
ugh bears, there are relatively unlimited people to buy, and such limited amount of people to sell. the chinese will run out abruptly in the middle of your trend party.

"Abruptly?" evidence? You have made a bald assertion with nothing to back it up. Where else are Chinese miners going to sell?

well practically, they can or cant sell, if they can, they will sell it to offshore buyers. if they cant, then they wont.
it's a fact that this will be resolved. there is a finite supply of fools who bought to get rich quick. they will sell, and never sell again.
but I guess anything is possible, so it must fall right?

As long as BTC is concentrated in the hands of people who have a negative fiat cash flow outside of BTC appreciation, selling pressure will continue. I know this because I am one of those people. I can survive for years before I run out, which means that if many others are in a similar situation, the down trend can last for years.

That doesn't mean the down trend will last for years, it only means it can. A crash is actually the bullish scenario. A long painfully drawn out slide is also possible.

The market could reverse at any time for any reason or no reason, but we are playing probabilities, not possibilities.



1536. Post 6485768 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 30, 2014, 11:37:43 PM
lez go, to 460 and beyond!

Maybe in next 12h... I do not predict that it will be faster than this.
nonsense

 we are moments away!

Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?



1537. Post 6485889 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: chessnut on May 01, 2014, 04:42:13 AM
ugh bears, there are relatively unlimited people to buy, and such limited amount of people to sell. the chinese will run out abruptly in the middle of your trend party.

"Abruptly?" evidence? You have made a bald assertion with nothing to back it up. Where else are Chinese miners going to sell?

well practically, they can or cant sell, if they can, they will sell it to offshore buyers. if they cant, then they wont.
it's a fact that this will be resolved. there is a finite supply of fools who bought to get rich quick. they will sell, and never sell again.
but I guess anything is possible, so it must fall right?

As long as BTC is concentrated in the hands of people who have a negative fiat cash flow outside of BTC appreciation, selling pressure will continue. I know this because I am one of those people. I can survive for years before I run out, which means that if many others are in a similar situation, the down trend can last for years.

That doesn't mean the down trend will last for years, it only means it can. A crash is actually the bullish scenario. A long painfully drawn out slide is also possible.

The market could reverse at any time for any reason or no reason, but we are playing probabilities, not possibilities.

the probability is another argument, when gaming companies are purchasing 40k bitcoins on a risky day I think the bear argument is losing it's grounds. this trend is showing strong signs of reversal.


A Gambling company.  Casino owners know value? I lived in Vegas before the great 2008 Crash. I assure you they do not.



1538. Post 6485992 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Does anybody doubt that there aren't at least some exchange owners trading on their own exchanges using insider information and dummy accounts? Didn't the fall of Gox teach us anything?  The safest time to buy is when your information is the same or the closest to the same as the big players. That time is not now for the vast majority of us.



1539. Post 6486025 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: chessnut on May 01, 2014, 05:06:09 AM
A Gambling company.  Casino owners know value? I lived in Vegas before the great 2008 Crash. I assure you they do not.

I said Gaming, not Gambling.

Yes, your attempt at spin is obvious.



1540. Post 6486078 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: chessnut on May 01, 2014, 05:22:32 AM
A Gambling company.  Casino owners know value? I lived in Vegas before the great 2008 Crash. I assure you they do not.

I said Gaming, not Gambling.

Yes, your attempt at spin is obvious.

hmmm not sure whats your point.

a gaming company buying bitcoin is uber bullish. the innovators have foreseen that this would be one of the first applications in the real world. ithe next wave is beginning.

I am not denying that gambling is an excellent use case for Bitcoin. I am saying that casino operators aren't any better at market timing than anyone else.



1541. Post 6486211 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: chessnut on May 01, 2014, 05:16:14 AM

you sold at 430. I bought at 430. you lose.

My average buy in is <$40. My average sell price is ~$400.  If that's losing, I'll take it.



1542. Post 6486837 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

If I was going to bet, I would bet that price is going nowhere. Not up or down by much. We have inadvertently achieved price stability and it's boring as hell. Who wants to bet that we'll see $500 or $400 in less than a week? I'll bet 0.1 BTC, 1:1 odds, no escrow.



1543. Post 6486995 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: windjc on May 01, 2014, 07:03:23 AM
If I was going to bet, I would bet that price is going nowhere. Not up or down by much. We have inadvertently achieved price stability and it's boring as hell. Who wants to bet that we'll see $500 or $400 in less than a week? I'll bet 0.1 BTC, 1:1 odds, no escrow.

I might take the bet if it were before May 10th.

I think this market still might have 1 big move in it before then.

If one or more of the exchanges has all their deposit options closed, we will see $400.

And we might see $500 in a rally around May 10th.

I agree there is a significant risk of an exchange halting deposits and that would possibly cause a drop below $400, but I think the chance is less than 50%. Any given day there is a chance of a whale driving up price $50 or more, but what the hell.

May 7 midnight GMT and the price is still in the $400s on Stamp with no breakouts higher that $499.99 or lower than $400, I win. I don't even think this is a smart bet. I'm just bored. You in?



1544. Post 6487138 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: windjc on May 01, 2014, 07:17:18 AM
If I was going to bet, I would bet that price is going nowhere. Not up or down by much. We have inadvertently achieved price stability and it's boring as hell. Who wants to bet that we'll see $500 or $400 in less than a week? I'll bet 0.1 BTC, 1:1 odds, no escrow.

I might take the bet if it were before May 10th.

I think this market still might have 1 big move in it before then.

If one or more of the exchanges has all their deposit options closed, we will see $400.

And we might see $500 in a rally around May 10th.

I agree there is a significant risk of an exchange halting deposits and that would possibly cause a drop below $400, but I think the chance is less than 50%. Any given day there is a chance of a whale driving up price $50 or more, but what the hell.

May 7 midnight GMT and the price is still in the $400s on Stamp with no breakouts higher that $499.99 or lower than $400, I win. I don't even think this is a smart bet. I'm just bored. You in?

Well, I'm bored too, lol.

But I like this bet even less than you. I can't take that bet, but keep coming up with some and I am sure I might bite at one.

How about this: By May 15 GMT midnight, if we've gone over $500 AND below $400 (in either order), you owe me 0.2 BTC and otherwise I owe you 0.1 BTC



1545. Post 6487237 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: windjc on May 01, 2014, 07:35:49 AM
If I was going to bet, I would bet that price is going nowhere. Not up or down by much. We have inadvertently achieved price stability and it's boring as hell. Who wants to bet that we'll see $500 or $400 in less than a week? I'll bet 0.1 BTC, 1:1 odds, no escrow.

I might take the bet if it were before May 10th.

I think this market still might have 1 big move in it before then.

If one or more of the exchanges has all their deposit options closed, we will see $400.

And we might see $500 in a rally around May 10th.

I agree there is a significant risk of an exchange halting deposits and that would possibly cause a drop below $400, but I think the chance is less than 50%. Any given day there is a chance of a whale driving up price $50 or more, but what the hell.

May 7 midnight GMT and the price is still in the $400s on Stamp with no breakouts higher that $499.99 or lower than $400, I win. I don't even think this is a smart bet. I'm just bored. You in?

Well, I'm bored too, lol.

But I like this bet even less than you. I can't take that bet, but keep coming up with some and I am sure I might bite at one.

How about this: By May 15 GMT midnight, if we've gone over $500 AND below $400 (in either order), you owe me 0.2 BTC and otherwise I owe you 0.1 BTC

So now you are going to take the high volatility side of the bet?

I will take this bet. If only because if we have that much volatility in the market in the next 2 weeks I will make so much that .2 btc won't even matter. And if its boring, then at least I get a .1 btc consolation price.  Cheesy

Deal. FWIW I think I have a ~60% chance of losing, but with a 2:1 payout, it's worth it.



1546. Post 6487375 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: windjc on May 01, 2014, 07:42:16 AM
If I was going to bet, I would bet that price is going nowhere. Not up or down by much. We have inadvertently achieved price stability and it's boring as hell. Who wants to bet that we'll see $500 or $400 in less than a week? I'll bet 0.1 BTC, 1:1 odds, no escrow.

I might take the bet if it were before May 10th.

I think this market still might have 1 big move in it before then.

If one or more of the exchanges has all their deposit options closed, we will see $400.

And we might see $500 in a rally around May 10th.

I agree there is a significant risk of an exchange halting deposits and that would possibly cause a drop below $400, but I think the chance is less than 50%. Any given day there is a chance of a whale driving up price $50 or more, but what the hell.

May 7 midnight GMT and the price is still in the $400s on Stamp with no breakouts higher that $499.99 or lower than $400, I win. I don't even think this is a smart bet. I'm just bored. You in?

Well, I'm bored too, lol.

But I like this bet even less than you. I can't take that bet, but keep coming up with some and I am sure I might bite at one.

How about this: By May 15 GMT midnight, if we've gone over $500 AND below $400 (in either order), you owe me 0.2 BTC and otherwise I owe you 0.1 BTC

So now you are going to take the high volatility side of the bet?

I will take this bet. If only because if we have that much volatility in the market in the next 2 weeks I will make so much that .2 btc won't even matter. And if its boring, then at least I get a .1 btc consolation price.  Cheesy

Deal. FWIW I think I have a ~60% of losing, but with a 2:1 payout, it's worth it.

I think you have a 75-80% of losing, so the odds weigh slightly in my favor if so.

I think your best chance is for us to continue up to $500 and then have an exchange get cut off.

I think if we see $400 before May 15th we won't be seeing $500 for a while.

You're prolly right, but if we have a retest of $340 support on high volume and it holds, then the double bottom is likely in and it's planes trains and automobiles for the summer.



1547. Post 6487577 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Wow, Stamp hit $460 almost an hour ago when we were screwing around. I almost owe Adam an apology if you take a very loose interpretation of the term "moments away".



1548. Post 6488695 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: solex on May 01, 2014, 08:56:19 AM
Wow, Stamp hit $460 almost an hour ago when we were screwing around. I almost owe Adam an apology if you take a very loose interpretation of the term "moments away".

Adam also called out $425 as a great buy which is an entry point nicely in profit now.


When has he ever not said it was a great time to buy? That particular signal got lost in the noise. Chances are I'll have at least one or two more times to buy at that price point.



1549. Post 6489130 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Starting to get  a little dumpage on huobi. Mayday, mayday!



1550. Post 6489365 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: capsqrl on May 01, 2014, 10:37:01 AM
If anyone wants to dump, there's plenty to dump into now - more than 10k down to $400.

The FBI's gonna need a little more bid depth than that.



1551. Post 6489529 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: dreamspark on May 01, 2014, 10:51:24 AM
yer cause the FBI is going to drop a market sell on Stamp  Huh

Bitcoins are fungible. Whoever is buying FBI coins will not be buying on Stamp, so the effect is the same. Whoever is buying FBI coins might sell on stamp, however.

Let's just say that if I were to buy 100,000 BTC at auction from the FBI for let's say 20 million dollars, you're damn right I'd dump a few thousand of them on the exchanges. That is a real downside risk.



1552. Post 6489889 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: dreamspark on May 01, 2014, 11:23:20 AM
yer cause the FBI is going to drop a market sell on Stamp  Huh

Bitcoins are fungible. Whoever is buying FBI coins will not be buying on Stamp, so the effect is the same. Whoever is buying FBI coins might sell on stamp, however.

Let's just say that if I were to buy 100,000 BTC at auction from the FBI for let's say 20 million dollars, you're damn right I'd dump a few thousand of them on the exchanges. That is a real downside risk.

Yes i agree with that but its not the FBI thats going to need a little more depth is it Wink

Its a funny thing though because its like a once in a lifetime chance to buy that much with no slippage, I really beleive that if/when coins go to auction they will a) be split in lots and b) probably be pushed up to close to market price due to the fact that if you did want to buy say 10k BTC the price would probably be pushed at least $100 higher by the time you managed to buy them all. I mean theres even the chance that if its a fairly open auction that those coins will go above market price for the same reasons.

I think people are a bit delusional if they think you will be able to get large amounts of coin at 50% of market price.

Government auctions are tricky.  For example I own a couple of lots in a small New Mexico development. I checked the tax rolls and discovered that most of the neighboring lots were auctioned off for back taxes. The auction price was about 10 percent of the market price. I asked several times to be put on the list for the next auction and I was never notified. The people that participate in these auctions have inside connections and the "contraband" gets too often sold at substantially lower than market rates. It's part corruption and part incompetence.

Let's just ask the thread: Has anyone attempted to buy the FBI coins or inquired as to how and where they could be purchased? The Feds claim they've already sold over 3 Million dollars worth. The whom? does anybody know?



1553. Post 6490074 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on May 01, 2014, 11:42:30 AM
The Feds claim they've already sold over 3 Million dollars worth. The whom? does anybody know?

If they're smart they sold the coins all over the country via LocalBitcoins.com so they could then arrest all those people for operating an exchange without a license or disregarding AML rules.

That's entrapment. Local cops do that kind of shit all the time, but the Feds at least usually pretend to follow the rules when they could so easily be shown to be actually initiating the "crime" they are prosecuting.



1554. Post 6490180 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: dreamspark on May 01, 2014, 11:41:22 AM
I think its definately a wait and see moment especially as the there are potentialy a substantial amount more people who have the "connections" who would want to buy BTC compared to a small New Mexico developement.

I agree that with gov auctions people arent notified and it slips under the radar but how often have the US government auction off anything with such widespread and global interest.


It was for the whole state, not just that one development. Per capita, many more people are interested in buying real estate than in buying cryptocurrencies.



1555. Post 6490343 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: freebit13 on May 01, 2014, 11:13:27 AM
Andreas Antonopoulos on Singularity 1 on 1: "Bitcoin is not currency, it's the internet of money!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW_wYvZ1eZg

Antonoplis is great, but he overlooked a few issues on why deflation would not be a problem, namely that Bitcoin is not and likely never will be legal tender. The supply of bitcoin is finite but the supply of cryptocurrency is not. If there is not enough liquid BTC, then BTC derivatives or something like litecoin can fill the gap.



1556. Post 6490632 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on May 01, 2014, 12:22:51 PM
The Feds claim they've already sold over 3 Million dollars worth. The whom? does anybody know?

If they're smart they sold the coins all over the country via LocalBitcoins.com so they could then arrest all those people for operating an exchange without a license or disregarding AML rules.

That's entrapment. Local cops do that kind of shit all the time, but the Feds at least usually pretend to follow the rules when they could so easily be shown to be actually initiating the "crime" they are prosecuting.

So your argument is: local cops use entrapment but federal officers do not?
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/how-fbi-entrapment-is-inventing-terrorists-and-letting-bad-guys-off-the-hook-20120515

I said they usually pretend to follow the rules, because local cops don't face as much scrutiny from entities like Rolling Stone. I'm not defending them. I'm just saying local cops are often worse when it comes to entrapment. I think the FBI believes they've been given almost carte blanche in regards to the GWOT. This isn't the same with white collar crime.  Just wait until the first bitcoin-funded terrorist action is committed. That's when the shit hits the fan.



1557. Post 6490803 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: octaft on May 01, 2014, 12:34:24 PM
The Feds claim they've already sold over 3 Million dollars worth. The whom? does anybody know?

If they're smart they sold the coins all over the country via LocalBitcoins.com so they could then arrest all those people for operating an exchange without a license or disregarding AML rules.

That's entrapment. Local cops do that kind of shit all the time, but the Feds at least usually pretend to follow the rules when they could so easily be shown to be actually initiating the "crime" they are prosecuting.

I do not believe that this scenario would legally be considered entrapment.

I've had this conversation with cops several times. Nothing is ever entrapment. OK, Give me an example of what YOU consider entrapment.



1558. Post 6491029 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on May 01, 2014, 12:44:59 PM
Andreas Antonopoulos on Singularity 1 on 1: "Bitcoin is not currency, it's the internet of money!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW_wYvZ1eZg

Antonoplis is great, but he overlooked a few issues on why deflation would not be a problem, namely that Bitcoin is not and likely never will be legal tender. The supply of bitcoin is finite but the supply of cryptocurrency is not. If there is not enough liquid BTC, then BTC derivatives or something like litecoin can fill the gap.

Maybe I am missing something, but why would there be 'not enough liquid BTC'?  If there is too little value available, BTC prices will rise and compensate for the lack in liquidity, no?   Why would anyone buy other stuff than the thing that keeps rising in value?

In general, you are correct, but let's say you wanted to buy a couple of supertankers worth of crude oil tomorrow and to pay for it with bitcoin. You couldn't easily acquire enough bitcoin to do that without seriously disrupting the markets, especially if the seller was going to cash out to fiat at the other end. You'd need to use a futures contract to avoid paying too much or too little.



1559. Post 6491794 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: dreamspark on May 01, 2014, 01:15:41 PM


Forgive me if I'm being ignorant but

Why would you do that and not just pay with fiat if fiat is the start and end goal?

Because you're buying the oil from Iran.

Quote
How does an alternative crypto currency with even less liquidity solve that problem?

It wouldn't in that exact case, but I'm sure you could imagine a scenario where some other crypto is temporarily more liquid than BTC.  When the U.S. was on the gold standard, many small purchases were completed with silver.




1560. Post 6492058 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: octaft on May 01, 2014, 01:22:24 PM
The Feds claim they've already sold over 3 Million dollars worth. The whom? does anybody know?

If they're smart they sold the coins all over the country via LocalBitcoins.com so they could then arrest all those people for operating an exchange without a license or disregarding AML rules.

That's entrapment. Local cops do that kind of shit all the time, but the Feds at least usually pretend to follow the rules when they could so easily be shown to be actually initiating the "crime" they are prosecuting.

I do not believe that this scenario would legally be considered entrapment.

I've had this conversation with cops several times. Nothing is ever entrapment. OK, Give me an example of what YOU consider entrapment.

A cop is not the person to ask. An officers job is to catch people committing crimes and arrest them. You don't get to scream "entrapment!" and walk away without an arrest. Your lawyer just gets an additional potential defense to get you off.

First two relevant (as in, not yahoo answers) google search results for "entrapment examples" turns up:

http://nationalparalegal.edu/public_documents/courseware_asp_files/criminalLaw/defenses/Entrapment.asp

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/entrapment-basics-33987.html

Some copy and pastes from those sites, for the lazy.

Case Example 1. Mary-Anne Berry is charged with selling illegal drugs to an undercover police officer. Berry testifies that the drugs were for her personal use and that the reason she sold some to the officer is that at a party, the officer falsely said that she wanted some drugs for her mom, who was in a lot of pain. According to Berry, the officer even assured Berry that she wasn't a cop and wasn't setting Berry up. The police officer's actions do not amount to entrapment. Police officers are allowed to tell lies. The officer gave Berry an opportunity to break the law, but the officer did not engage in extreme or overbearing behavior.

Case Example 2. Mary-Anne Berry is charged with selling illegal drugs to an undercover police officer. Berry testifies that, "The drugs were for my personal use. For nearly two weeks, the undercover officer stopped by my apartment and pleaded with me to sell her some of my stash because her mom was extremely sick and needed the drugs for pain relief. I kept refusing. When the officer told me that the drugs would allow her mom to be comfortable for the few days she had left to live, I broke down and sold her some drugs. She immediately arrested me." The undercover agent's repeated entreaties and lies are sufficiently extreme to constitute entrapment and result in a not guilty verdict.

Case Example. Let's say Jim is charged with serving as a lookout during a liquor store robbery carried out by a street gang. Jim claims that Snitch, a neighborhood friend who turned out to be an undercover police officer, entrapped him by telling him that he had to participate in the robbery or Snitch would be unable to protect him from gang retribution. In a state that employs an objective test for entrapment, a jury decides whether Snitch's actions would have induced a normally law-abiding person to participate in the robbery. In a state that employs a subjective test for entrapment, the prosecutor can offer evidence of Jim's predisposition to commit the crime, including that Jim had a lengthy rap sheet and that he was anxious to join the street gang and wanted to prove his mettle by participating in a violent crime. A jury would then decide whether Jim participated in the robbery out of his own willingness to do so, regardless of Snitch's actions.

1) Fred, a law abiding citizen, is walking home from work one afternoon when Wilma, a prostitute, approaches him and offers her services for the price of fifty dollars. Fred has never used the services of a prostitute before, but he decides to give it a try and he takes Wilma up on her offer. Wilma leads Fred to a nearby motel room and, once inside, she identifies herself as an undercover police officer and arrests Fred. In this situation, an entrapment defense will probably not be available to Fred because Fred responded readily to the opportunity to commit this crime. Therefore, although Wilma provided Fred with the opportunity to commit the crime, she did not induce him to do it.

2) Fred, a law abiding citizen, is walking home from work one day when Wilma, a prostitute, approaches him and offers him her services for the price of fifty dollars. Fred tells Wilma he is not interested and continues walking. Over the next several blocks Wilma follows Fred and repeatedly offers her services to him, which Fred repeatedly rejects. However, after a few minutes, Wilma’s repeated offers pique Fred’s curiosity and he decides to give it a try. Wilma then leads Fred to a nearby motel room and once inside she identifies herself as an undercover police officer and arrests Fred. In this case, Fred will have the entrapment defense at his disposal because Wilma repeatedly requested that Fred commit the crime and it was only after several rejections by Fred that Wilma succeeded in getting him to actually commit the crime. Therefore, in this case, Wilma has actually induced Fred, who does not seem to be predisposed to committing this kind of crime, into committing the crime.

Note how the localbitcoins scenario involves no undue pressure to buy, and it would be quite easy to convince a jury that you would have bought those bitcoins regardless of whether you had seen their ad.

Not if I was on that jury.
"undue" is subjective. How were you going to buy bitcoins if they weren't for sale? If I'm a firefighter (and I am), I can't get credit for putting out a fire when I put oily rags next to a heater. Placing the ad is encouraging and enabling the "crime". If I as a private citizen did it, could be prosecuted for soliciting, then when a policemen does the same thing, he is entrapping. Fucking cops need to understand their job is crime prevention primarily and secondarily to assist in the solving and prosecution of crimes. Turning people into criminals so they can have someone to arrest is itself a criminal act.



1561. Post 6492429 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 01, 2014, 02:21:17 PM
The Feds claim they've already sold over 3 Million dollars worth. The whom? does anybody know?

If they're smart they sold the coins all over the country via LocalBitcoins.com so they could then arrest all those people for operating an exchange without a license or disregarding AML rules.

That's entrapment. Local cops do that kind of shit all the time, but the Feds at least usually pretend to follow the rules when they could so easily be shown to be actually initiating the "crime" they are prosecuting.

For a guy who is usually propagating anti-federal government rhetoric, you (BJA) surely are being inconsistent here to be giving the fed govt the benefit of the doubt in their policing shenanigans. 

This is one of the frequent themes that I have witnessed with supposed libertarians who will want to get rid of the fed govt when it comes to its role in providing a vast array of social services - however, when it comes to various policing functions or property protection functions, some anti-govt folks seem to harbor some kind of blindness that the federal government is more likely to follow rules.  Maybe I am being too hard on libertarians, here, and this inconsistent viewpoint is merely yours, BJA.

You are adjusting the facts to attempt to fit your assertion, but it still remains quite fantastical to assert that any major discount will be achieved through a mass sale of BTC.

Jesus Christ, I'm not defending the FBI. I'm merely stating that they receive special training on undercover procedures that will hold up in court. They don't follow the rules all the time, but in certain circumstances they follow the rules better than local cops not out of the goodness of their hearts or out of some higher belief in fairness but because they don't want to have their perps get off on what they consider a technicality.

I'm not saying the FBI coins will sell for/ have been sold for a major discount. I'm saying I don't know, and the FBI isn't forthcoming with the information. It's certainly possible.



1562. Post 6492684 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: octaft on May 01, 2014, 02:32:31 PM
Not if I was on that jury.
"undue" is subjective. How were you going to buy bitcoins if they weren't for sale? If I'm a firefighter (and I am), I can't get credit for putting out a fire when I put oily rags next to a heater. Placing the ad is encouraging and enabling the "crime". If I as a private citizen did it, could be prosecuted for soliciting, then when a policemen does the same thing, he is entrapping. Fucking cops need to understand their job is crime prevention primarily and secondarily to assist in the solving and prosecution of crimes. Turning people into criminals so they can have someone to arrest is itself a criminal act.

So let's say I go onto a website to buy cocaine. I see an ad for cocaine, and contact the seller to buy it. How was I in any way pressured or entrapped to buy cocaine? I clearly was seeking out a way to buy cocaine, and almost certainly would have broken the law regardless of whether that person was an undercover cop. Now replace "cocaine" with "bitcoins" and it is the exact same situation. You absolutely did not go to localbitcoins with the express intent to not buy bitcoins, just like you didn't go onto that drug website to not buy cocaine.

There are some gray areas regarding entrapment. This is absolutely not one of them. Even if the ad was sent to me directly regarding the sale, as long as they didn't keep hounding me after I said no, it would not be entrapment.

EDIT: To further address your comments, "turning you into a criminal" is entirely entrapment. Passively offering to sell you something that you likely would have purchased anyway is not "turning you into a criminal," because you had plans to commit the crime, anyway, and just happened to be unfortunate enough to do it with an undercover officer.

How do you know if someone likely would have purchased something anyway? That's not just a subjective judgement. That would require psychic powers. It's not a crime to have a criminal predisposition. It's a crime to violate the law and if that particular law would not have been violated by that particular person at that particular time and place without the police involvement, then it's entrapment. If you offer a certain number of bitcoins for a certain price at a certain place or time, then all you know for sure is that the accused wanted to buy those particular bitcoins for that particular price ant that particular time, and wouldn't have done so if he didn't have the opportunity.

You're not passively offering to sell something if you place an ad. If someone come up to you out of the blue and asks to buy your bitcoins and you agree, that's passive. Advertising is active.



1563. Post 6492794 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: dreamspark on May 01, 2014, 02:49:58 PM

Because you're buying the oil from Iran.


Who like the rest of the world primarily trade oil in the world reserve currency which it just so happens you are able to send them.

Iranian banks have been cut off from the international bank of settlements due to sanctions and pressure from the U.S. gov.



1564. Post 6493062 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: octaft on May 01, 2014, 02:50:46 PM
Not if I was on that jury.
"undue" is subjective. How were you going to buy bitcoins if they weren't for sale? If I'm a firefighter (and I am), I can't get credit for putting out a fire when I put oily rags next to a heater. Placing the ad is encouraging and enabling the "crime". If I as a private citizen did it, could be prosecuted for soliciting, then when a policemen does the same thing, he is entrapping. Fucking cops need to understand their job is crime prevention primarily and secondarily to assist in the solving and prosecution of crimes. Turning people into criminals so they can have someone to arrest is itself a criminal act.

So let's say I go onto a website to buy cocaine. I see an ad for cocaine, and contact the seller to buy it. How was I in any way pressured or entrapped to buy cocaine? I clearly was seeking out a way to buy cocaine, and almost certainly would have broken the law regardless of whether that person was an undercover cop. Now replace "cocaine" with "bitcoins" and it is the exact same situation. You absolutely did not go to localbitcoins with the express intent to not buy bitcoins, just like you didn't go onto that drug website to not buy cocaine.

There are some gray areas regarding entrapment. This is absolutely not one of them. Even if the ad was sent to me directly regarding the sale, as long as they didn't keep hounding me after I said no, it would not be entrapment.
I think this goes back to what Billy said earlier: it's not a cops job to be going around putting up ads for cocaine. It's their job to prevent crime, not incite/entice crime.

That is a valid opinion, but not the way the law currently sees it.

Even as screwed up as it is, the law still gives jurors discretion over what is reasonable and what kind of pressure is "undue". Buying and selling on localbitcoins has not been determined to be illegal under case law yet, and a minimum amount is still necessary to trigger AML statutes anyway. Selling small amounts should be relatively safe until there is more legal clarification one way or another.



1565. Post 6493257 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: octaft on May 01, 2014, 02:58:20 PM
How do you know if someone likely would have purchased something anyway? That's not just a subjective judgement. That would require psychic powers. It's not a crime to have a criminal predisposition. It's a crime to violate the law and if that particular law would not have been violated by that particular person at that particular time and place without the police involvement, then it's entrapment. If you offer a certain number of bitcoins for a certain price at a certain place or time, then all you know for sure is that the accused wanted to buy those particular bitcoins for that particular price ant that particular time, and wouldn't have done so if he didn't have the opportunity.

You're not passively offering to sell something if you place an ad. If someone come up to you out of the blue and asks to buy your bitcoins and you agree, that's passive. Advertising is active.

What are the odds that someone goes to cocaine dealer/localbitcoins with no intent to buy, then suddenly decides to buy precisely because of one ad that likely does not overly stand out from the others? Even if that leap of faith did turn out to be true, good luck convincing 12 people of that with a prosecutor working them. I would think a good lawyer would recommend a different defense.

He picked that one ad for a reason. Perhaps a better price or more convenient location. Doesn't matter. It's that one ad he responded to and he wouldn't have responded to it if it wasn't there. Whether or not he would have responded to a different ad is irrelevant. He's not being charged with responding to a different ad. Good luck convincing all 12 jurors, including the one who has the capacity for independent thought, that you are prosecuting an illegal sale that would have occurred without a seller.



1566. Post 6493434 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: dreamspark on May 01, 2014, 03:14:18 PM

Because you're buying the oil from Iran.


Who like the rest of the world primarily trade oil in the world reserve currency which it just so happens you are able to send them.

Iranian banks have been cut off from the international bank of settlements due to sanctions and pressure from the U.S. gov.

Right and I'm sure the only account that an Iranian oil tycoon has is an Iranian bank account.

You're really missing the point. If the seller demands to do the deal in bitcoin for any or no reason, and you don't want to blow the deal, you meet the seller's terms. In extremely large transactions, those terms will likely include provisions for fluctuating value of the currency.



1567. Post 6493768 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: octaft on May 01, 2014, 03:33:24 PM
How do you know if someone likely would have purchased something anyway? That's not just a subjective judgement. That would require psychic powers. It's not a crime to have a criminal predisposition. It's a crime to violate the law and if that particular law would not have been violated by that particular person at that particular time and place without the police involvement, then it's entrapment. If you offer a certain number of bitcoins for a certain price at a certain place or time, then all you know for sure is that the accused wanted to buy those particular bitcoins for that particular price ant that particular time, and wouldn't have done so if he didn't have the opportunity.

You're not passively offering to sell something if you place an ad. If someone come up to you out of the blue and asks to buy your bitcoins and you agree, that's passive. Advertising is active.

What are the odds that someone goes to cocaine dealer/localbitcoins with no intent to buy, then suddenly decides to buy precisely because of one ad that likely does not overly stand out from the others? Even if that leap of faith did turn out to be true, good luck convincing 12 people of that with a prosecutor working them. I would think a good lawyer would recommend a different defense.

He picked that one ad for a reason. Perhaps a better price or more convenient location. Doesn't matter. It's that one ad he responded to and he wouldn't have responded to it if it wasn't there. Whether or not he would have responded to a different ad is irrelevant. He's not being charged with responding to a different ad. Good luck convincing all 12 jurors, including the one who has the capacity for independent thought, that you are prosecuting an illegal sale that would have occurred without a seller.

You do realize that nothing needs to be certain, only "beyond a reasonable doubt" to get a conviction, right? If someone goes on a website designed to distribute something, then purchases that something after seeing an ad, it's pretty reasonable to think that they intended to buy that something regardless of which ad they read.

To say that it is an unreasonable assumption would surely be independent thought, but independent does not mean correct.

"correct" according to you? It's reasonable to doubt that a person is just as likely to commit a crime when he sees an ad encouraging him to commit a crime as when he doesn't. The ad makes him more likely to buy, as all ads do. That's why we have ads. If ads didn't work, Madison Avenue would be just another street. The ad made him more likely to buy and we don't know by how much, but if it's not reasonable to say that it could have made the difference between deciding to buy and not deciding to buy, then it would also be unreasonable for anyone but cops to place ads in the first place. Since other people do place ads, reasonable doubt should be a given.

Nothing needs to be certain, but the prosecutor's case isn't only that that ad didn't convince him to buy. The prosecution has to claim that the ad COULDN'T convince him to buy in order to meet the threshold of reasonable doubt. That's a tough sell. You'd need twelve jurors who never placed or responded to an ad.



1568. Post 6494080 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: dreamspark on May 01, 2014, 03:53:51 PM

Because you're buying the oil from Iran.


Who like the rest of the world primarily trade oil in the world reserve currency which it just so happens you are able to send them.

Iranian banks have been cut off from the international bank of settlements due to sanctions and pressure from the U.S. gov.

Right and I'm sure the only account that an Iranian oil tycoon has is an Iranian bank account.

You're really missing the point. If the seller demands to do the deal in bitcoin for any or no reason, and you don't want to blow the deal, you meet the seller's terms. In extremely large transactions, those terms will likely include provisions for fluctuating value of the currency.

Yeah I agree with that but if the issue for you aquiring the BTC is that its immpossible to buy that many then whoever is selling isnt going to get anyone able to meet their terms. The seller wants to sell as much as a buyer wants to buy, requring an unreasonable or immpossible payment method isn't going to get you any buyers, period.

Going back to the original point how does an alternative crypto solve this problem?



As I already said, an alt coin would not likely solve this particular problem. A Bitcoin derivative like a futures contract could. The seller could want a bitcoin payment to evade sanctions, avoid charge-backs, or any number of reasons or combination of reasons. 



1569. Post 6494171 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on May 01, 2014, 04:01:35 PM
This guy is really loading up on coins without moving the price... makes me very optimistic.

Optimistic that we won't run out of sellers?



1570. Post 6494269 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: octaft on May 01, 2014, 04:11:30 PM
You do realize that nothing needs to be certain, only "beyond a reasonable doubt" to get a conviction, right? If someone goes on a website designed to distribute something, then purchases that something after seeing an ad, it's pretty reasonable to think that they intended to buy that something regardless of which ad they read.

To say that it is an unreasonable assumption would surely be independent thought, but independent does not mean correct.

"correct" according to you? It's reasonable to doubt that a person is just as likely to commit a crime when he sees an ad encouraging him to commit a crime as when he doesn't. The ad makes him more likely to buy, as all ads do. That's why we have ads. If ads didn't work, Madison Avenue would be just another street. The ad made him more likely to buy and we don't know by how much, but if it's not reasonable to say that it could have made the difference between deciding to buy and not deciding to buy, then it would also be unreasonable for anyone but cops to place ads in the first place. Since other people do place ads, reasonable doubt should be a given.

Nothing needs to be certain, but the prosecutor's case isn't only that that ad didn't convince him to buy. The prosecution has to claim that the ad COULDN'T convince him to buy in order to meet the threshold of reasonable doubt. That's a tough sell. You'd need twelve jurors who never placed or responded to an ad.

It's quite contrarian to argue that someone visiting a site designed to distribute something, then buying that something, was not intending to buy regardless of that one particular ad out of potentially 100's. I notice my edit wasn't included in your quote, so allow me to put it up again: Let's try this with something legal that isn't bitcoin to see if it sticks. I want to buy the most beautiful bow for my daughters birthday present. I go on etsy or some shit and start looking up bows. I see this one ad with this terrific bow, it's so beautiful and perfect! So I buy it. Wouldn't it be reasonable to say if I didn't see that ad, I would not have simply given up on buying bows, but rather would have bought a different bow?

No, it's not that simple. It's reasonable that you might have bought her something else. You might have bought her another bow, but you might have bought her something else. Your case is reasonable, but it's not beyond a reasonable doubt. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the burden of proof that applies here.



1571. Post 6498681 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: aminorex on May 01, 2014, 05:35:08 PM
But it isn't.  Almost no one holding BTC is unable to accumulate more.

How do you know that?  I for one am flat broke at present Sad

My reasoning is default reasoning:  People who accumulate BTC are thinking ahead.  People who think ahead, tend to have better cash flow than people who don't.  The prime exception would be those who accumulate too aggressively.  But people who accumulate too aggressively tend to get squeezed out, so they end up being non-holders (or lesser holders).  The over-aggressive are likely a very small number, but more vocal than those who are less aggressive (and so forum chatter is likely to lead to over-estimation of their numbers).



That's silly. It's the bear market that squeezes them out so your reasoning is circular. They will get squeezed out until they are squeezed out, so the bear market can continue until it doesn't continue. How aggressive is too aggressive? That's something that's only known after the fact, as is how aggressive isn't aggressive enough. Forward thinking people tend to project their own forward thinking on to others (I do it all the time) when that isn't necessarily the case. Being ahead of your time is just as dangerous as being slow when it comes to market timing.



1572. Post 6499011 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Obvious troll is obvious. I'm trying to make a bear case for various technical and fundamental reasons, but we should all know that every day is one day closer to the end of the bear market if it hasn't ended already.  I don't like being a bear and I'll happily flip when I think it's appropriate to do so. 

Trade on. That is all.



1573. Post 6499152 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Volume and price action wise this really looks almost identical to the market circa Mach 23 just before a huge sell-off.  I urge extreme caution.



1574. Post 6503351 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: p0peji on May 02, 2014, 04:53:01 AM
Go ahead guys CCMF trade this at your peril. I think I'll sit out.



It is looking more and more like in March indeed.

Even the volume is similar. I wonder if the Chinese have noticed this.



1575. Post 6521296 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

It seems a waste of time to conjecture about a war in Europe or a crash to single digits. These things are extremely unlikely and a lot of other bad things would have to happen first. Ukraine looks like it may break up into two countries (not counting Crimea) roughly along language lines with or without a limited civil war.  The Western Leaders AND Putin would both have to make some rather foolish mistakes for things to escalate to the point of any hostilities outside of Ukraine. The economic interdependence of Russia and the West is simply too strong at this point.

Bitcoin is likely to retest $340 support if one or more of the big three Chinese exchanges goes dark. That support may never get retested, it might get tested and hold or it may not. Even if it doesn't hold, the next step down is only $266-$300. That's bad, but it's not a disaster. It's premature to discuss disaster scenarios. There may come a time when it's appropriate to discuss them but there are far too many unknowns for even attempting to assign probabilities at this point in time.

Black Swan events by definition are things that happen so rarely that you can't assign them probabilities. What we are seeing is a rather boring reduction in demand due to PBoC hostility.  The market is searching for an equilibrium that will form a base for the next rally. If past is prologue, then we'll likely bounce around near that base for months before heading back up to quadruple digits. In short, I just don't see any reason for extreme skepticism or optimism here.




1576. Post 6534188 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: Cassius on May 03, 2014, 08:48:36 PM

Some transactions are fast, low-cost and secure.
For everything else, there's MasterCard.

Priceless.



1577. Post 6534306 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 04, 2014, 12:47:23 AM
Quite amazing how Tera nows exactly what will happen in the next 2 years.

...but not more crazy compared to people who (constantly) claim that we are only a few days away from going to the moon Smiley I think TERA is basing her prediction based on at the past where there has been long periods with less activity (in between bubbles).

I see something similar, coin distribution is what is happening and this process is hindered by coagulation, there are players in the space who will become distortedly wealthy if the market cap increase, hence they have too big a stake, we will need to see this experiment look like it's going to fail before those hoarders help distribute coins so distribution ends up resembling a normal distribution curve. I'm not predicting anything just think there is a roughly 30% chance something like this happens.

It's the true believes who survive.

You may be able to shake coins from people who bought recently, but it is NOT going to be easy to shake coins from those who have already experienced 10x or 100x appreciation.  Those HODLers would NOT have any major incentive to get rid of significant portions of their portfolio, unless you say that we are going into the double digits, which would be difficult for any manipulator to accomplish without losing significant capital.in the process of attempting to get prices there.

It's precisely because my investment has appreciated so much that it makes sense for me to sell a portion and diversify. It's not logical to keep The vast majority of my portfolio in one highly speculative, risky, volatile asset even if I passionately believe in it, think it will succeed and want it to succeed. The more bitcoins appreciate, the larger their portion of my total portfolio and the more reason to diversify. Of course this also works the other way around and it means I'll buy back if they get cheap enough. 



1578. Post 6550050 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: TERA on May 05, 2014, 03:49:39 AM
I don't think of the upcoming drop so much as a prediction, but as a painfully obvious feature of the chart that I thought we all agreed on.

As bad as I am at TA, it's pretty clear that there are a bunch of people here worse. Yes, obvious drop is obvious.



1579. Post 6566289 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 06, 2014, 03:06:59 AM


They really seem to be talking out of both sides of their mouth... and accordingly engaging in selective enforcement tactics, which is NOT anything new.. to pick off the most vulnerable in society and pick off the most easy to target folks.

The government is not monolithic. There are many conflicting programs to make home buying both more affordable and more expensive at the same time for example. Actually the latter programs are supposed to prop up home prices, but that makes them less affordable to new purchasers. Every bureaucrat is a tin pot dictator within his own fiefdom and the unintended consequences on the other bureaucrats cause the conflict.  (This is how we win eventually).



1580. Post 6566437 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on May 06, 2014, 03:23:58 AM
Let's panic sell because we didn't see this coming.
And make sure to follow a dying exchange all the way down. Go idiots go!

On this volume there is very little panic selling...yet. It's gonna have to get a lot panicier before I even start buying.



1581. Post 6566738 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 06, 2014, 03:49:49 AM


They really seem to be talking out of both sides of their mouth... and accordingly engaging in selective enforcement tactics, which is NOT anything new.. to pick off the most vulnerable in society and pick off the most easy to target folks.

The government is not monolithic. There are many conflicting programs to make home buying both more affordable and more expensive at the same time for example. Actually the latter programs are supposed to prop up home prices, but that makes them less affordable to new purchasers. Every bureaucrat is a tin pot dictator within his own fiefdom and the unintended consequences on the other bureaucrats cause the conflict.  (This is how we win eventually).

I believe that you are again changing the subject - b/c I made my statement in response to the articles links referenced by Aminorex's post.   I am still a little bit unclear about the point that Aminorex was attempting to make by posting the links to those articles.   

BJA:  I agree with your point that the govt is NOT monolithic.. but I remain unclear about the relevance of your "tin pot dictator" assessment or your suggestion that "we" are attempting to win something - which seems to be referring to transitioning to libertarianism... and those latter points, though interesting in themselves do NOT seem to be the reason that Aminorex referenced those articles.

We're not just transitioning to libertarianism. That's far too mild. We're transitioning to crypto-anarchy, but it's going to be a long bloody struggle. The governments are aiding in this transition with their ham-fisted attempts at controlling the uncontrollable. We're giving the people the supply and the government is providing the demand. I know how crazy culty insane it appears to the uninitiated, but we are going to rebuild civilization itself, stronger faster better like the six million dollar man. We have the technology.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wntX-a3jSY



1582. Post 6568862 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

I do not have a strong sense of the meaning of this last announcement, but if it means that the big exchanges are actively going to discourage BTC from being used as a Chinese gambling chip then it's most popular current use in China will cease to exist. The PBoC does not apparently want BTC to be used for transactions, so what justifications could the exchanges give the PBoC for operating at all?

I am surprised that the price is as high as it is. It's actually starting to diverge from the pattern of March. Does that mean the drop were were expecting won't happen, will happen later than expected, will be greater or less than expected? I don't know. All I know is that I'm not going to trade in an environment where I don't have an edge. That means I have to wait until this China crap blows over or until the price is so low I can price in my uncertainty. There's prolly opportunities for people with more understanding of China, but I'm not going to fool myself into thinking I can sit in the pilot seat and teach myself how to fly in real time by watching youtube videos.




1583. Post 6569115 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: windjc on May 06, 2014, 07:39:08 AM
I do not have a strong sense of the meaning of this last announcement, but if it means that the big exchanges are actively going to discourage BTC from being used as a Chinese gambling chip then it's most popular current use in China will cease to exist. The PBoC does not apparently want BTC to be used for transactions, so what justifications could the exchanges give the PBoC for operating at all?

I am surprised that the price is as high as it is. It's actually starting to diverge from the pattern of March. Does that mean the drop were were expecting won't happen, will happen later than expected, will be greater or less than expected? I don't know. All I know is that I'm not going to trade in an environment where I don't have an edge. That means I have to wait until this China crap blows over or until the price is so low I can price in my uncertainty. There's prolly opportunities for people with more understanding of China, but I'm not going to fool myself into thinking I can sit in the pilot seat and teach myself how to fly in real time by watching youtube videos.



I wouldn't over analyze this if I were you. Let's just use our common sense. Our common sense says that if fiat can't get into exchanges, exchanges can't profit and they can't exist in China.

If HVT and leverage trading goes away, incentives for trading bitcoin go away.

I do not know how this PR changes anything. In fact, the exchanges (or at least OKCoin) said they were going to mum. But here they are putting out a release.

Common sense tells me the Chinese exchanges should be going out of business, which is why I can't understand why so many are acting as if they aren't. Gox operated for months or possibly even years while insolvent. How long can the Chinese exchanges operate? The only way to really know what is going on is to wait until they start going offline. Notices written in Chinese give someone else an edge, not me. I can only read between the lines in English.




1584. Post 6569250 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: p0peji on May 06, 2014, 08:02:52 AM
Great, that stupid POS news killed all the great downward momentum, now it is back to playing the waiting game...  Cry

Kinda what I was thinking. The market's been high on Hopium for a damn month. No reason for it. Hangover's gonna be a bitch.



1585. Post 6571951 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: latoxine on May 06, 2014, 11:34:50 AM

hello,

1) just to say it's a plaisure to read you since few days, and see that you talk 99% about the initial topic. ( and not social,  etc...Maybe the ''bet story'' wasn't necessary ;-)  )  

2) Why china rule the BTC world, and not the US ? Is it like this from the begining ?!

China leads now because supply and demand in the West are both relatively constant and predictable.



1586. Post 6582576 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: aminorex on May 06, 2014, 09:26:09 PM
Thanks. So another way of putting this might be:
"Not sure about bitcoin. By the way, recession in 12 months."

That would be an accurate interpretation.  I tend to use maximum entropy defaults and focus on statements about swaps/spreads, so I put it another way.


A massive depression is overdue, but there is really no way of knowing both when and how it is going to play out because Central Bank and Government interference is going to postpone it as long as possible (which will ensure it is as severe as possible).



1587. Post 6586622 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: jl2012 on May 07, 2014, 04:51:50 AM

PBOC can't kill bitcoin. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.

I agree with this, but in the short term that which doesn't kill you makes you cheaper.



1588. Post 6587315 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: jl2012 on May 07, 2014, 06:09:15 AM

PBOC can't kill bitcoin. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.

I agree with this, but in the short term that which doesn't kill you makes you cheaper.

As you have survived the 2011 great bear market, you are here for long-term, aren't you?

Correct.



1589. Post 6600070 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

I watched the Senate hearing last night on Ukraine. A senator (Democrat of course) suggested forcing Visa and Masterdcard to stop transactions in Russia as a way to get Putin to the negotiating table.  I'm not sure what this idiot was thinking by telegraphing such a move, but Putin must have been watching too.

http://www.coindesk.com/payments-become-political-weapons-mass-destruction/

I keep waiting and waiting for my cheap coins and dumbass politicians do something to convince the world that they are going to screw up everything they can screw up and Bitcoin is needed more than ever.



1590. Post 6862323 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 21, 2014, 09:34:52 PM

Guess what: most intelligent people understand that government and public services are a good thing, and that taxes are necessary to have them.


Most intelligent people 300 years ago thought people could be owned, leeches were medicine, and that outer space was filled with ether. The logical fallacy you are making is called http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum



1591. Post 6863814 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 21, 2014, 11:00:59 PM
BTW people please don't think he represents academics in general. I'm one and I take great offense.
There is no such thing as an "academic in general".  As you must know, they come in all colors - from unrepentant hippies to crypto-nazis.



What really bugs me is not that you know nothing of economics, but you and many others don't even think there is anything to know. You don't know classical, Marxist, Keynesian, monetarist or Austrian economics. You're like a woman who criticizes a product of automotive engineering because you don't like the color of the cars or the attitude of the drivers. You are not a worthy opponent. You don't even know what game you are attempting to play. You. don't. get. it.



1592. Post 6864840 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: aminorex on May 21, 2014, 11:30:46 PM
Some taxes are inevitable, and I won't complain much.  You have to pay someone to keep away all the other people who would extort you if you didn't.  Fine. Whenever I am tempted to think that life sucks, I just consider the alternatives.  There are even some taxes which are used in a socially positive manner.  Okay, not where I think the effort should be expended perhaps, but at least it's not actively evil.  In my (admittedly limited) experience, the lion's share of taxes are either lost to corruption or applied to categorical manifest evil.

When you allow people to cloak themselves with "legitimacy", the gates of hell open.  Precious few people, and no institutions, in history have had the moral fiber not to be corrupted by the power of the state, to kill or let live, according to a whim, and when you convince them that this is the moral high ground, well... what hope then?  We're watching, in real-time, the ongoing simultaneous breakdown of all of the paradigms of legitimacy with their intrinsic restraints AND the checks and balances which had previously restrained abuse by design.  It has all been sold to the highest bidder, and those bidders are NOT interested in buying your children a bright future.

I can see why someone who matured in a developing nation might consider progress to be the current norm.  We can endure so much if we hope for a better future.  It is not.  The peak daylight of human liberty and dignity is over.  It's time to prepare for the night which follows.  Prepare, and defend, in depth.

The situation would be different perhaps, were it not for the abdication of parenthood to the state creche.  Decades of propaganda leaves young adults unable to think in a way that is grounded in reality.  It typically takes decades of deprogramming before they are competent to manage their own affairs.  By that time, much of their revolutionary capacity is lost.  By middle-age, one tends to play it safe and restrict ones ambitions.  And the elderly (poor majority) do love the social safety net, so they are thoroughly bought, where one exists.

These unfortunate conditions will be temporary, but I suspect that they may endure for at least a decade, probably two.  The ones which are intrinsic to human nature will endure longer still, I hope (but am not certain).

I don't accept that taxes are inevitable. People once said that slavery had existed as long as civilization and always would. The human capacity to appropriate the fruits of other people's labor will always be with us, but it will not always necessarily be institutionalized. As far as government services go, anything worthwhile can and will be funded voluntarily. The taxers may eventually find that other types of theft and fraud are more profitable.



1593. Post 6874328 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: magicmexican on May 22, 2014, 01:25:03 PM
should i dump my ripples?

I would, but I also wouldn't have bought them in the first place. Ripple was an interesting idea, but the introduction of the XRP effectively turned RL into a central bank. I already had problems with the system being decentralized and not fully distributed, but the pre-mined nature of XRP put some serious perverse incentives into play.


On another topic, am I the only one disappointed that Circle turns out to be very much like Coinbase and nothing really new except free insurance, a larger ($10) loss leader and the ability to accept credit cards? I love seeing competition in the space, but I was hoping for something more original.



1594. Post 6885294 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

I don't see a fundamental basis for the technical rally. Cumulative good news in the West and a lack of bad news in China do not appear to be an adequate explanation. This was mostly just seller exhaustion which is not the same thing as a sustained increase in demand. What has happened to make BTC appear more valuable?

What needs to happen for me to feel comfortable that a prolonged bull market is underway is for some new application or applications to be deployed that offer some new benefit. With all of the potential, I'm actually surprised we haven't seen more code development translate into usable applications. What I would most like to see are more and better title tracking tools in the block chain.

On the political side, the East/West divide is growing over Ukraine, the pipeline deal between China and Russia, and currency wars. This is starting to look like Cold War II and if the Eastern powers see Bitcoin as a primarily Western phenomenon, then an eventual banning of BTC-e and Chinese exchanges will be likely. Ironically, Bitcoin would be a powerful tool to break the iron grip of Western Banksters over the world economy, but up until now I see no indications that the Eastern Powers recognize it as such.

I still have my trade account close to 100% fiat and I'm painfully aware of the possibility that I'm missing the train. My consolation is that the vast majority of my holdings are in cold storage. I'm still an ultrabull, but obviously not a permabull anymore because there remains substantial risk that we are not out of the woods yet. China needs to become not just less relevant but functionally irrelevant if a technical or political solution to PBoC hostility is not found. Bulls should find comfort that I and those like me still have lots of fiat on the exchanges to provide support if the rally falters.






1595. Post 6886294 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: byronbb on May 23, 2014, 02:03:26 AM
I don't see a fundamental basis for the technical rally. Cumulative good news in the West and a lack of bad news in China do not appear to be an adequate explanation. This was mostly just seller exhaustion which is not the same thing as a sustained increase in demand. What has happened to make BTC appear more valuable?

What needs to happen for me to feel comfortable that a prolonged bull market is underway is for some new application or applications to be deployed that offer some new benefit. With all of the potential, I'm actually surprised we haven't seen more code development translate into usable applications. What I would most like to see are more and better title tracking tools in the block chain.

On the political side, the East/West divide is growing over Ukraine, the pipeline deal between China and Russia, and currency wars. This is starting to look like Cold War II and if the Eastern powers see Bitcoin as a primarily Western phenomenon, then an eventual banning of BTC-e and Chinese exchanges will be likely. Ironically, Bitcoin would be a powerful tool to break the iron grip of Western Banksters over the world economy, but up until now I see no indications that the Eastern Powers recognize it as such.

I still have my trade account close to 100% fiat and I'm painfully aware of the possibility that I'm missing the train. My consolation is that the vast majority of my holdings are in cold storage. I'm still an ultrabull, but obviously not a permabull anymore because there remains substantial risk that we are not out of the woods yet. China needs to become not just less relevant but functionally irrelevant if a technical or political solution to PBoC hostility is not found. Bulls should find comfort that I and those like me still have lots of fiat on the exchanges to provide support if the rally falters.

Using the exchanges as the actual pricing mechanism is probably insufficient. Lage buyers were probably going OTC and shorting like hell at bitfinex. Ie keep the exchange price low, while buying from private sellers.

That would still leave all sorts of questions. Are these new buyers or old hodlers increasing their positions? Who's buying and why and how deep are their pockets? Best case scenario is that tech millionaires are building large positions to be in a position to take maximum advantage of the increase in value that will occur when their new software/tech companies build and deploy new products. If that is happening or even being rumored to be happening, I'd love to know about it.

Again I was disappointed that Circle so far is just another version of Coinbase. Good that there is competition, but I want to see that killer app that is out there. The code development that I see is tiny and disappointing compared to the potential.



1596. Post 6946986 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 26, 2014, 10:31:45 AM
@Jorge
I'm curious. You're an academic, and a scientist, I believe. So any theory you hold must be falsifiable in order to be viewed as credible.
Under what criteria would you entertain the idea that you might be wrong about bitcoin, or cryptocurrency in general?
I answered this some 6,223,678,221 pages ago on this thread.  "Success" will be when bitcoin (or crypto) gets used by a large number of people because it is cheaper/faster/safer/easier/whatever than the alternatives.  Not because one has a BTC stash to burn, not to support the cause, not to evade taxes or make illegal payments, not because it is hip, not to speculate with, not out of curiosity, etc.

Offline key/address generation and asymmetric crypto-signing of "digital checks" are undeniable wins that I am sure will be widely adopted eventually.  As for the rest of the bitcoin protocol, and the Satoshi blockchain in particular, I am more skeptical than ever.


What's notable is that Trolfi admitted he couldn't be argued out of his position, so only empirical evidence will convince him.



1597. Post 6947211 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on May 26, 2014, 11:40:36 AM
@Jorge
I'm curious. You're an academic, and a scientist, I believe. So any theory you hold must be falsifiable in order to be viewed as credible.
Under what criteria would you entertain the idea that you might be wrong about bitcoin, or cryptocurrency in general?
I answered this some 6,223,678,221 pages ago on this thread.  "Success" will be when bitcoin (or crypto) gets used by a large number of people because it is cheaper/faster/safer/easier/whatever than the alternatives.  Not because one has a BTC stash to burn, not to support the cause, not to evade taxes or make illegal payments, not because it is hip, not to speculate with, not out of curiosity, etc.

Offline key/address generation and asymmetric crypto-signing of "digital checks" are undeniable wins that I am sure will be widely adopted eventually.  As for the rest of the bitcoin protocol, and the Satoshi blockchain in particular, I am more skeptical than ever.


What's notable is that Trolfi admitted he couldn't be argued out of his position, so only empirical evidence will convince him.

So taking part in discussion is no longer useful for him. He needs to sit back and wait.

It's worse than that. A man who can't be persuaded by logic or reason is attempting to persuade others by logic or reason. That necessarily means the only people he could convince are people more open to logic and reason than he is himself. It's a hypocrisy that speaks more to the sorry state of academia than to anything else. These professors are not teaching students how to think. They are telling them WHAT to think.



1598. Post 7013728 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 26, 2014, 12:33:57 PM
What's notable is that Trolfi admitted he couldn't be argued out of his position, so only empirical evidence will convince him.
The original poster asked what I would consider proof of success.  Obviously that can only be empirical.

Logic can only change someone's expectations of success.  I could be argued out of my position, but I see big flaws in the supporter's arguments (like "the price will go to the moon because the supply is limited") which they refuse to acknowledge. Why should I change my expectations then?


That's bullshit. I asked you what it would take to convince you of the merits of Bitcoin and you responded that I shouldn't bother to even try. For an academic, you don't appear to have a strong understanding of your own thought processes. You appear to use reason and logic only in an ex post facto attempt to rationalize beliefs you obtained though other than rational means.

Again, what is the economic framework you are operating under? Classical, neoclassical, Keynesian, monetarist, Austrian or other? Do you even know? Your economic model (assuming you even have one) is not intuitively obvious to your interlocutors. Without some common frame of reference your communication is so poor that many assume miscommunication and sophistry is your aim. It's getting rather difficult to avoid that conclusion.



1599. Post 8447809 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

I had to take three months off when the train left without me, but I'm back, Baby. I still have the cash from when i foolishly dumped and now I'm ready to get back in the game asoon and this next crash makes it cheap enough.  This many shorts get squeezed when it's over and it'll go to up like a rocket, but it's likely to get worse before it gets better.



1600. Post 8448795 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: explorer on August 20, 2014, 06:06:18 AM
I had to take three months off when the train left without me, but I'm back, Baby. I still have the cash from when i foolishly dumped and now I'm ready to get back in the game asoon and this next crash makes it cheap enough.  This many shorts get squeezed when it's over and it'll go to up like a rocket, but it's likely to get worse before it gets better.


Did you really take 3 months off, or were you a closet chart watcher?   I once took a whole week off...  Terrifying.  I don't recommend it.

I was watching to see if I was going to have a chance to come back in. I wish my account was at BTC-e so I'd be loaded back up already.

I'll repeat what I said three month's ago: the best way to know the bear market is over is with a retest of the ~$340 low on higher volume. Volume is the key.



1601. Post 8448931 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: lay785 on August 20, 2014, 07:45:35 AM
why is bitfinex trading at btce price and not stamps?

It's trading between the two. I suspect BTC-e which is usually a bit lower had a few short term profit takers when their deep orders got filled in the crash to $309. Lucky bastards.

Stamp is what I consider the true spot price. the others, even though I have an account and bitfinex, are weighted less.

It pisses me off that we never got any resolution in China. Now I'm always going to be looking for a goxxing from hooboy.  




1602. Post 8450364 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: barbs on August 20, 2014, 09:10:27 AM
So, basically all of the alts are up big time and we are flat on the whole for the day. http://coinmarketcap.com/

1. So, does this mean that we are really supposed to be breaking the bear trend, now? (I don't think so... the bounce back was anemic and we haven't retested the low); OR

2. The alts didn't get the memo and the gamblers who took out leverage on those because they thought they'd go up faster are now doubling down on the bet to keep pumping the price and they are about to get uber-slaughtered.



I'm going with 3.) No one knows wtf is going on and the whales have successfully completed confused the minnows

Um, yeah. If there is someone smarter than you with substantially more money, then he's probably going to take it from you.  Listen up, people: there are two things that we are doing here to provide value to the Bitcoin economy: We are either reducing volatility and making money, or we are contributing volatility and paying off the good traders and hopefully learning something in the process. WE are the decentral bankers of Bitcoin. We are the liquidity providers and we are also here to take away the punch bowl when things get too frothy. We are trying to do what central bankers would try to do if bitcoin had a central bank.  Now bitcoin is too volatile which means we are needed. The goal for most people here is to learn what the hell you are doing before you go broke. It's hard, but there is great opportunity for those with skill and a high risk tolerance.

Pay attention to the moving averages.  until the four hour cross, there is no real momentum at all and we can assume a bias to the down side. I missed the train on the shot up to $687 so I'm not risking all cash, but here we are back in the four hundreds, so all I really lost was three months and I still have the same money as if I rode the market up and back down. Make your money on the overshoots up and down, and have enough coin and fiat to profit if either happens.



1603. Post 8450539 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: manfred on August 20, 2014, 10:13:20 AM
Remember the days when bitcoin was down 93.08% from its all time high (closing price on June 8 2011 was $ 29.6 on Nov 18 2011 it was $ 2.049)


This suffers from the same flaw as Pascal's Wager (Google it).  If you want to say hedge your bets by getting some litecoin, then the same argument holds for all other alts with an even shorter history and steeper exponential trendline. Darkcoin? There are over a hundred alts to consider. What, bitcoin isn't risky and volatile enough for you? Are you day trading or gambling?



1604. Post 8454742 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

unbelievable. I had a sell order in @ $509.11 in bitfinex and in went up to $508.88 before dropping back down. 23 rotten cents. what are the odds that's as high as it goes for a while?



1605. Post 8467873 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

It really looks like a bullish pennant, and as usual, I am out of position, but I'll still get a piece of it if it goes up again. A Bull-pennant is a continuation pattern.  They don't always pan out.  Pay attention to your stochastic RSI and look for Stamp to lead a rally or China to lead a dip.



1606. Post 8471572 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Price is much more stable today. Me and my fellow decentral bankers have done our job! Only idiots put in market orders when the price is stable. Save that shit for chopping off the tops and bottoms.



1607. Post 8479385 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 21, 2014, 08:29:15 PM
Price is much more stable today. Me and my fellow decentral bankers have done our job! Only idiots put in market orders when the price is stable. Save that shit for chopping off the tops and bottoms.


WELCOME BACK!!!!.... Talking your book... yes, we know that you shorted, and you want the price to go down... good luck with that.

It's working out so far. Got ~40% of my trading stack back and I'm still sitting on a pile of cash just waiting for cheaper coinz. 



1608. Post 8479439 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 22, 2014, 04:06:13 AM

What is that hole in the bids at 20:30? Seems like the bitstamp api didn't return the bids at all at that time...

That's not a hole. The bids just dropped. Holes generally affect both sides.

that was 1.2K BTC dump and then instant flash recovery, i was impressed, and then it happened again!

And again, but with smaller sells Tongue

BFX looks so bullish if you go by depth.. I just dont trust it  Lips sealed



the ask side might as well not even be displayed its nothing compared to the dumps and sells we see min to min

bfx doesn't control the market. Stamp and China do. It looks like a bunch of horny guys on paycheck Friday looking for someone to fuck. Most go home and wank off. Look and the Stamp order book and it'll tell you the Lunar launch may be delayed or cancelled.



1609. Post 8479599 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 22, 2014, 04:23:57 AM
bfx doesn't control the market. Stamp and China do. It looks like a bunch of horny guys on paycheck Friday looking for someone to fuck. Most go home and wank off. Look and the Stamp order book and it'll tell you the Lunar launch may be delayed or cancelled
lunar launch, delayed, such depressing news.

you got bids in the 490-500 range?

Yes, but I have bids all the way down into the $300s. A double bottom would be the most bullish development for the long term. I don't know if it's going up or down. All I know is that I have too much fiat and not enough coins.



1610. Post 8479768 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 22, 2014, 04:43:12 AM
Price is much more stable today. Me and my fellow decentral bankers have done our job! Only idiots put in market orders when the price is stable. Save that shit for chopping off the tops and bottoms.


WELCOME BACK!!!!.... Talking your book... yes, we know that you shorted, and you want the price to go down... good luck with that.

It's working out so far. Got ~40% of my trading stack back and I'm still sitting on a pile of cash just waiting for cheaper coinz. 


Well hopefully you are gaining back some of your trading stack and NOT just making things up!!!!!   

To me, it seems fairly risky to be trading, unless you happen to be a whale... and really talking your book can be quite irritating, even though quite a few posters do some variation of such.... in order to get people to follow their lead. 

I am thinking that we may see $480 or $490 in the next 12 hours... but sometimes those kinds of prices only last a short period, and I am NOT really set up for automatic buys, since I continue to buy my BTC through Coinbase....

NOW, I recall that you were a little bit amorphous about revealing some details of your trading stash... but I believe that your trading stash represented less than 10% of your total BTC stash?  Or have you changed your parameters? 

Also, I believe you had said that your average cost per BTC was in the less than $40 per BTC arena.. Is that still true, or have those calculations changed?

And another question is whether you trade with leverage or NOT... on the terms of the exchanges... I suppose that is where there remains greater possibilities in shorting, if you can do it correctly.  I get the sense that you do trade with leverage, and possibly you would NOT need to engage in that practice if you have a decent stash of your own coins.  The leverage game is stacked in favor of the house; however, if you are dealing with your own stash of cheap coins, then you could be in a fairly decent position to increase your BTC, also.... 

For me, personally, I would only feel comfortable trading on the very large swings in BTC prices, and currently, I consider anything below $700 or $800 to be well below the BTC price trendline (which has been true for more than 6 months), so I am way too nervous to sell... on the other hand, I may become a little more comfortable to sell some, if the price goes up... and even better if it goes above the trendline and even better if I experience at least one BTC bubble during my BTC investment experiences (been in the game for almost 9 months, and NO baby yet... to take from Risto... fuck!!!!!!.. ) ... anyhow:  probably I would be trading with well less than 10% of my stash, unless I feel pretty certain about a downward correction in price or if some other market conditions were to exist.

I buy through Coinbase too, but only if I am full BTC in my trading account. That is a bad, unbalanced position to be in and I took a loss just to get back in the game. I might have just waited longer and saved some money, but I only work in probabilities, not certainty. For day trading, CB is unworkable. You need a large exchange with lots of liquidity like bfx or Stamp. I am talking my book, but I'm honest about it. I want the price to go down so I can get more coins. a crazy crash like the one on BTC-e aa few days ago to $309 is not out of the question. Unfortunately,  I no longer have enough cash to place meaningful orders down to $1 like I once did. This is Bitcoin, the only thing steeper than the spikes and crashes is the learning curve. 



1611. Post 8479873 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 22, 2014, 04:48:01 AM
bfx doesn't control the market. Stamp and China do. It looks like a bunch of horny guys on paycheck Friday looking for someone to fuck. Most go home and wank off. Look and the Stamp order book and it'll tell you the Lunar launch may be delayed or cancelled
lunar launch, delayed, such depressing news.

you got bids in the 490-500 range?

Yes, but I have bids all the way down into the $300s. A double bottom would be the most bullish development for the long term. I don't know if it's going up or down. All I know is that I have too much fiat and not enough coins.

might be waiting a while, even 490 would be a crazy good buy.

price was 600-700 when the us senate meeting happened. and so much has happened since news wise. china ban didn't kill it, mtgox didn't kill it.

hard to understand why price wouldn't come back to these levels soon.

Gox was failing before the ATH. A China syndrome might STILL play out and as a matter of fact it might be the cause of the next crash. Gox was giving us warning signs for months if not years. News from China could be seen similarly. I'm not trying to scare anyone. These are simply risks that should be weighted with your estimate of how probable they are. 

$490 may indeed be a crazy good buy, but the price was $443 just three days ago. Time will tell.



1612. Post 8481554 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Possible inverse head and shoulders pattern. Watch for a breakout out if it crosses the $520 neckline.  I won't be too happy about it, as I'm still mostly sitting in fiat. It's better to sit in a lambo than a Fiat.



1613. Post 8508657 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

These are the times that try a Bitcoiner's soul. Every time this happens--on average once a year--I get amazed at how painful it is.  This is the kind of market that separates the men from the boys. I've been monkey-hammered in trade after trade, so I forget that I'm still up over %10,000 in fiat terms from my original investment. Bad things seem to happen all at once, and my personal life and net worth get crushed simultaneously and every time I have to slowly claw my way back. Many of you are in a similar situation. Take heart. We are making history.  If this trip throws your life out of balance, then take a break. we'll still be here when you get back.  I was up to two cartons of cigarettes a week and letting my life go to shit. That means I care too much to make objective decisions.

I'm still bullish long term, but I just don't what's going to happen next. I just know that I'm either going to make a lot of money or I'm going to learn something. I can live with that.



1614. Post 8508817 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on August 24, 2014, 06:44:09 AM


TA can work in a transparent enough market, that isn't heavily concentrated. But, the bitcoin market is far from being transparent and the ownership is probably also heavily concentrated.
Not to mention the lack of laws, that would at least slow down the insider manipulation done by those, who own the major exchanges.
Because the lack of transparency and the heavy grip that the exchanges have over the market, bitcoin is more of an gamble then an investment. Doing TA with bitcoin is mostly to justify ones gambling addiction, or some could even use it to hide the fact, that they are actually connected with the insiders.
With bitcoin, the only ones who know the future, are the ones who have enough power to create the future. The market is too immature to offer any stability for serious TA. TA that you see here, is mostly just lines drawn at a direction of own personal hopes.



T/A has limited value, but that doesn't mean it's worthless. Over time, the coins do get concentrated in the hands of a few smart people. These people use T/A, so it becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy. Luck plays a role, but so does skill. Professional poker is also a zero-sum game, but there are guys who can make a living at it.  The more bets you make, the more success is skill and less random chance because tiny percentage advantages compound over time.



1615. Post 8509253 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: rpietila on August 24, 2014, 07:37:08 AM
Over time, the coins do get concentrated in the hands of a few smart people.

It has to be noted that persistent hoarding by these smart people greatly increases the value of everybody else's coins. The market cap of the unhoarded stock grows larger when the hoarded stock grows larger.

There is an element of Austrian economics at play. There is no point is having lots of coins if you don't spend them eventually. If the hoarders never spend (or lose their private keys), then everyone else's coins become more valuable. If they do spend them, the the coins do eventually get distributed. I may not have my wealth properly diversified, but It's a no-brainer to always hold at least somecoins. The risk/reward ratio makes Bitcoin a far better than even money bet. Through quantitative easing (money printing), fractional reserve lending and artificially low interest rates, fiat is a poor bet by comparison. It has the advantage of being far more liquid, but coins can be converted to fiat at any time pretty quickly. 



1616. Post 8509395 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

I don't know a single high profile Bitcoin enthusiast with an IQ below 130. I would say most are three standards of deviation above the mean. Now I may not quite be a genius myself, but it's only logical to do what smart people do if you want to succeed at least as much as them.  This is how technological revolutions begin. The Winklevi were in Facebook before there was  Facebook. They got screwed over by Zuckerberg, but I think they learned a lesson from it. They are not lazy people. They are Olympic-level athletes.
They are not unsuccessful people. They may come from money, but the vast majority of their wealth was self-made.

Of course their are insiders, but it's still a far less rigged market than stocks, bonds or even real estate. Especially centrally-controlled fiat. The fluctuations are greater, but that just means the time scale is ramped up. Everything you do is risky and that includes doing nothing. The way smart people do it is to diversify, exercise discipline, and hope you make more good bets than bad.

Cheaters don't keep their money because they didn't earn it and so they don't value it as much as those who had to sweat and work hard. They waste wealth and that just means that honest people can buy it from them at a discount. Life is far from fair, but everyone reading this at least has an internet connection so you should probably be happy life is unfair. You are likely a beneficiary of that unfairness if you look at the big picture.



1617. Post 8509450 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Only an idiot holds a margin position over night.

 "I will tell you how to become rich. Close the doors. Be fearful when others are greedy. Be greedy when others are fearful." ~ Warren Buffet

" "Leverage is the only way a smart guy can go broke." ~ Warren Buffet

They guy is old school and doesn't understand bitcoin technology or Austrian economics, but he does understand investing.



1618. Post 8509482 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

and for Christ's sake keep the majority of your bitcoins off the exchange. If you don't hold the private keys, you don't own any bitcoin.



1619. Post 8509670 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: AceWallen on August 24, 2014, 08:52:14 AM
Regarding TA:

It's simple:


Some people don't know how TA works or what it's supposed to do.
The same folks try to apply what they think TA is but they lose money.
Their conclusion: TA doesn't work.


The End.

regarding TA, i think many around here are asking themselves, "does TA work or not?" and the real answer is, "I am a bad trader." and that has absolutely nothing to do with TA.

I agree. Sell your coins if it's making you miserable. I want the price to go down so I can buy more. If you don't have the brains or the balls to play this game, then STFU and GTFO. I'm going to BTFD.



1620. Post 8510476 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Please short if you don't mind potentially missing the train. The next ATH is probably at least three months away and possible nine months, but it's looking like a possible inverse head and shoulders and we're bouncing off the bottom of the exponential trend line. The only thing for certain is that the unexpected happens every once in a while and going full fiat means your going to lose a guaranteed 3% a year due to inflation. Dovish comments by Janet Yellen suggest it will be worse than that. Short term things could get ugly, but that means there is a pile of cash sitting on the exchange chasing a trend. that will limit the downside and all of those people waiting for $50 coins this time last year lost 90% of their coin purchasing value, even at these prices. Position yourself so that time is your friend whether it goes up or down. I once bought at $10 and had to wait 18 months to show a profit, but Bitcoin's long term probability of success is far greater now than then.

A bear market this bad is not when long term holders dump. We buy back our coins and sell on the way up. That's why we still have our coins. look at the five year trend line and decide for yourself if this is a good time to buy. The only way to loose your coins trading is by over estimating how far the price will drop or by expecting a drop that doesn't materialize at all.




1621. Post 8510732 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

How many dumpers are left after a nine month bear market? I don't know except that there are less than there were yesterday and far less than last month. at some point, the trend will reverse and it's possible that it already happened. I don't know and this isn't a recommendation, but the longer we go sideways, the more bullish I get.



1622. Post 8532515 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

I'm not very good at T/A, but it's possible the third wave after the bubble is behind us. All I know is that I'm either half as dumb or twice as smart as the guys who bought at $1,000.00.  I figure even if it goes down by half again, I'm only 12 months away at most from doubling my money. Yes, that's right folks. I'm a bull again. 75% crypto, 25% cash, 100% balls and how much brains I have will be determined after the next big move.



1623. Post 8532966 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: Sandia on August 25, 2014, 10:58:24 PM
well fuck.

sub 500 everywhere.

The irrationality is amazing.  Where are the sellers going to buy back in?  I can't imagine that we can get to 485, maybe not even 490.  Sell at the bottom?  Wow....

What is the opposite of a bagholder?


Oh, it can go a lot lower. In 2009 I bought back in at $15 after the high of $32 and was upside down for 18 months. But I still have most of those coins, so it all worked out eventually. Of course anyone who wants to puss out without much slippage can dump into a pretty impressive buy wall. The order book is showing bullishness and I think I'm going to run with the herd on this one.




1624. Post 8533093 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: Sandia on August 25, 2014, 11:12:47 PM
well fuck.

sub 500 everywhere.

The irrationality is amazing.  Where are the sellers going to buy back in?  I can't imagine that we can get to 485, maybe not even 490.  Sell at the bottom?  Wow....

What is the opposite of a bagholder?


Oh, it can go a lot lower. In 2009 I bought back in at $15 and was upside down for 18 months. But I still have most of those coins, so it all worked out eventually.

I don't see a way.  Even if the 7k dumper came back, he could not push Bfx to 470, and price would jump right back.  My emergency fiat is bidding at 490.

You going to put that last 25% in?


Not with the moving averages like this. I'll move those orders up if the spot price goes up, trying to buy the dips and then turn it around quickly if we get a crazy spike. 



1625. Post 8533246 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 25, 2014, 11:24:17 PM
well fuck.

sub 500 everywhere.

The irrationality is amazing.  Where are the sellers going to buy back in?  I can't imagine that we can get to 485, maybe not even 490.  Sell at the bottom?  Wow....

What is the opposite of a bagholder?


Oh, it can go a lot lower. In 2009 I bought back in at $15 and was upside down for 18 months. But I still have most of those coins, so it all worked out eventually.

I don't see a way.  Even if the 7k dumper came back, he could not push Bfx to 470, and price would jump right back.  My emergency fiat is bidding at 490.

You going to put that last 25% in?


Not with the moving averages like this. I'll move those orders up if the spot price goes up, trying to buy the dips and then turn it around quickly if we get a crazy spike.  

your a trooper

may the force be with you

Back at ya, Adam.  I think whoever keeps scooping up the coins at the bottom will find that it gets harder each time as this market matures.



1626. Post 8533589 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: Schickeria on August 25, 2014, 11:58:20 PM
We can not go up, either down.

So how about building up some wall on 500 and after it's finished breaking it down and repeat it multiple times?  Cheesy

That's a good thing. That means the price gets more stable and less volatile which make Bitcoin more useful for transactions. Bitcoin doesn't need a central bank because it has us. We make our money by punishing volatility.



1627. Post 8540413 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

This no volume trickle up is meaningless. The inverted head and shoulders reversal pattern didn't pan out.  Is there even enough cash on the exchanges to to push us up to $600? I think we're going to have to wait some more.  Still, I can't imagine the bears have much ammo left after shorting for nine months.



1628. Post 8540738 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Someone just pumped ~ $50,000 worth into BTC on BTC-e.  Could be nothing or it could be some trader looking to dump again if we go up 5%.  Still, it's weird that it would happen on an exchange where BTC was trading @ $309 a week ago.



1629. Post 8541148 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

4 HR moving average just turned green.  I hope this isn't another false start.



1630. Post 8541686 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: bigdave on August 26, 2014, 02:55:55 PM
600 btc wall @ 510 on Bfx is about to get eaten...

(burp)



1631. Post 8542220 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: mmitech on August 26, 2014, 03:54:22 PM

it is sad how most Americans have no clue about what is really going around the world, and still think that USA is the greatest country in the world and the land of "freedom", when most of their follow citizen still struggles and cant get the basics of a free education and health care.

Free education? How do the teachers feed and house themselves?

The students don't have to pay all their lives for loans, their education comes from already paid taxes which goes to pay teachers and expenses of college... I for once paid annually 20€ for registration fee in college and another 40€ for my dorm room, then there is the student coupons (supported price from the government ) to use in restaurants.

If I pay my tax they better use it to make my life and the life of my children better, most EU and north African countries have this system, but in the US they instead spend tax money exporting "democracy" and "freedom" around the world, billions of dollars spent on war while millions of Americans struggle in poverty and losing the basic human rights, things that even central Africans are improving at.

So not free. Good. Let's actually acknowledge those people who are going out there and working day after day to pay for this stuff and realize that this stuff doesn't just fall from the sky.

well, we all pay taxes, same like you do in the US but we don't have to additionally take loans and be in debt all our lives to pay back what we should be entitled to in the first place, we all have the same equal chance for education here... it is just sad to see talented people in the US having to escape college because they cant afford it, this is all what I am saying.

I pay taxes for one reason only: the gov has more guns than I do. It's not legit because it's involuntary. If anyone else forced you to give them money, it would be called what it is. ROBBERY!



1632. Post 8552548 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

It's gonna take some time to chew through these walls. I wonder if the bears are getting nervous.  I'm cool as can be. I don't even care if it goes down. I'll just buy more and lower my average buy in price.



1633. Post 8552705 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 27, 2014, 09:22:55 AM
I have suggested that in theory the USA is a democracy, and accordingly people should be deciding NOT money. 
.

Democratic republic. Specifically designed to attempt to keep power devolved to the people as much as possible because of that whole "power corrupts" thing.

Capitalism itself just means the ability to accumulate the fruits of your labors. In itself, it's fairly innocuous and forms the basis of any society advanced beyond "sitting in the dirt, eating mud". It is not really even an "ism". It has been responsible for the most properous and generous societies ever in the history of the world. It has raised billions form misery and poverty.

Personally, there is an internal tension between democracy and capitalism, and people try to act as if they are nearly one of the same..

Some do. Those people are wrong. There is some link between the two however. When people are allowed to accumulate, they tend to prefer peace because war is bad for business. When that is broken, such as through central banking and inflation, the problems start. Hence, bitcoin.


I'm just suggesting that the people decide.. and that is NOT just my preference, and I am willing to live and accept when the people decide what they want, even if it does NOT make a lot of sense to me on an individual preference level... but that will NOT stop me from speaking or writing my input.. so long as free speech is allowed in this new or evolving system.

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting what to have for dinner

Democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried


There are a large number of ways to form better democracies and more responsible capitalism...blah blah blah

Democracy is mob rule. The only irresponsible capitalism is state-controlled crony capitalism. Capital is savings. Real capitalism is the free market without artificial regulations. Markets like Bitcoin self-regulate.  Keep your bitcoin off the exchange or all you have are bitcoin IOUs.  Manage your coins and all your wealth by protecting your downside risk and be patient. This is not a get rich quick scheme. 



1634. Post 8554700 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: ErnieX on August 27, 2014, 12:19:24 PM
On track to reach US$670.

Before a pull back at resistance and then on to $5,000 some time early next year. A slow grind up is the best bullish signal beside higher highs and higher lows. I think there may be one more visit into the $500s before we never see them again.  I hope so. I need to get the rest of my trading cash in before a can forget about Bitcoin for a couple of months.



1635. Post 8554770 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: Phillis on August 27, 2014, 12:40:40 PM
and a little dump

not a big enough dump for me. I want MOAR COINZ!!!!



1636. Post 8554862 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: klee on August 27, 2014, 12:45:44 PM
If it breaks 510 probably another bull trap

that all depends on the volume. if it doesn't go below $450 and there is high volume, I'm gonna bump up to  85% crypto.



1637. Post 8554890 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: BitChick on August 27, 2014, 12:46:57 PM
So I just got back from a family trip to Disney World.  My cell phone totally died on the second day so I had no internet for almost a week.  Did I miss anything?  According to the price it looks like it was a good week to take a break from BTC.  Wink

It was an excellent week to scoop up more BTC, but stressful as hell. Not as stressful as it will be trying to decide to dump at four thousand or six thousand.



1638. Post 8556894 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

C'mon you fucking bears, dump already. Don't be stingy with those coins. You need the money. Yer gonna give 'em to us anyway, so you might as well do it now with low slippage.



1639. Post 8563363 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

look at the difference in the order books between bfx and stamp.  Stamp is showing more bearish sentiment and bfx is solidly bullish. I think bfx has taken over the market leading role, but time will tell.



1640. Post 8564279 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: oyvinds on August 28, 2014, 02:06:35 AM
The Nail In The Petrodollar Coffin: Gazprom Begins Accepting Payment For Oil In Ruble, Yuan
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-27/gazprom-begins-accepting-payment-oil-ruble-yuan

EUR is rallying, USD is dropping like a stone.

anything that is bad for the dollar is good for bitcoin in dollar terms.



1641. Post 8564288 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.09h):

Quote from: Gimmelfarb on August 28, 2014, 02:25:37 AM
i'm noticing some people around here remark that BFX is leading the market. i think that's crazy. if Huobi sneezes, BFX jumps off a cliff. welcome your Chinese overlords with open arms already.

I only said leading the market relative to bitstamp. I'm on record for maintaining that China is a wild card.



1642. Post 8602914 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.09h):

I was a "nuke" on the USS Ohio. We operated the reactor plant, not the missiles.

speaking of the cold war, Brittain wants to kick Russia out of the SWIFT money transfer system. Hmmmm. I wonder what the Rooskies could use instead? Maybe some kind of distributed global asset register.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-29/kick-russia-out-swift-uk-demands-beware-retaliation



1643. Post 8603154 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.09h):

Quote from: empowering on August 30, 2014, 11:04:05 PM
I was a "nuke" on the USS Ohio. We operated the reactor plant, not the missiles.

speaking of the cold war, Brittain wants to kick Russia out of the SWIFT money transfer system. Hmmmm. I wonder what the Rooskies could use instead? Maybe some kind of distributed global asset register.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-29/kick-russia-out-swift-uk-demands-beware-retaliation

Did the pictures make you feel nostalgic ?

(ps I note that images of the plant are non existent)

I don't miss it, to be honest. 21 hours of work a day. The pictures of the plant would be classified.



1644. Post 8630496 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.10h):

The owner of a properly positioned portfolio shouldn't much care where the price goes, especially in the short term. Only the best or luckiest day traders can use this market as a reliable source of income. For most of us, it is a form of investment or savings.  Leverage really takes away from your ability to wait out the fluctuations, so it should be used mostly in those rare circumstances where price have moved very far and rapidly out of the trading range and a partial snap-back is almost inevitable.

If you have an outside source of income and a positive cash flow, then almost anytime is a good time to buy. It's just a question of how much. Everyone wants to maximize our return on investment, but being too greedy or stingy can cause you to miss out on opportunities. This downward momentum we are currently experiencing shouldn't bother long term holders much because it is an opportunity to distribute coins to either more people (which will widen the user base) or smarter people (which will reduce volatility and make bitcoin more useful for transactions). In either case, it's good for the long term growth of the Bitcoin economy.



1645. Post 8646266 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.10h):

Where's these $15 bitcoins Professor Bitcorn promised us? I've had my buy order in since July! What gives?



1646. Post 9000500 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Forget the last bubble. If you knew a year ago that the price today would be around $400, would you be predicting the end of Bitcoin? Everything is going well. I don't know how much lower it will go, but I feel more comfortable holding now than if I had no position in BTC. I'll buy more if it goes lower and I really hope it does, but it feels cheap to me now.



1647. Post 9006998 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

juuuuuust a little bit lower and I start buying again.



1648. Post 9010880 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.17h):

Quote from: akujin on September 29, 2014, 01:33:44 AM
Mini pump  Grin
Wake up guys Grin

could be interesting. Time will tell. Doesn't mean much until the 1 HR moving average crossover.



1649. Post 9098561 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

What the hell? Why is this whale dumping on Stamp? Where's the BFX love?

Is there any news associated with this crash, anyway?



1650. Post 9098851 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

Quote from: explorer on October 06, 2014, 03:32:45 AM
that wall belongs to FEDs.

Huh
Guys i think this makes sense, because BitStamp wouldnt dare to take FEDs coins right? I mean whos stupid enough to leave that many coins on a foreign exchange ?


And don't forget to sell on Sunday to ensure the lowest possible price!  Yes, yes, you can collect overtime for working Sunday.

There's no way this price level holds when the banks open tomorrow. If it does, I start hitting all the pawn shops and loan sharks I know. Can't imagine I'll be the only one doing it, either.



1651. Post 9099043 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

Quote from: boumalo on October 06, 2014, 03:49:51 AM

When you say "There's no way this price level holds" you mean that the price will recover; the price is not going to hold means the price is going down




Not if you are considering the price of dollars in terms of BTC.



1652. Post 9099327 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

Quote from: molecular on October 06, 2014, 04:27:55 AM
While these coins are cheap, its more scary that this large whale is most likely exiting the btc market.  Not good to see big money go out the door.

I think it's good as long as many buyers are buying. Distribute all the coins!

Unfortunately I fear that now is one of these times when only few have the balls to buy. The masses? Probably not.

The few who buy when there's blood on the streets are the ones who clean up. All of those Russian oligarchs bought up shares of gazprom and the other formerly state-owned businesses for pennies on the dollar. WE buy when it's low and sell to the momentum monkeys during the next bubble. (then buy them all back at half price afterward)



1653. Post 9123954 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

There is an immanent cross of the 4 HR moving average and I'm afraid my deposit won't make it in time  Sad



1654. Post 9130224 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

The $300 dumper on Stamp just officially lost 1.5 million dollars!



1655. Post 9130378 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

Quote from: BitChick on October 08, 2014, 03:56:48 PM
The $300 dumper on Stamp just officially lost 1.5 million dollars!

Hopefully he just buys back now to cut his losses.  Cheesy

(Or it was just a clever way for him to get this rally started but who knows.)

The point is he has 9 million dollars to put a floor on $275.  Downside risk is much lower now.



1656. Post 9130555 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

Quote from: sidhujag on October 08, 2014, 04:16:51 PM
Just a heads up... watching OKCOIN btc/cny the rise has been on bad footing... i expect it to go lower and make new lows... you can take me to the bank with this.

if the Chinese want to give the West back our bitcoin at a loss, that's OK with me.



1657. Post 9132732 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

I'm hoping that the Chinese will dump some more tonight so I can increase my position. I love being in a position where I don't care if the market goes up or down  Grin



1658. Post 9153210 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: Newbie1022 on October 10, 2014, 02:01:54 PM
I have been shorting since $387. I wasn't 100% sure it was time to short at the time, but I am fairly certain now. It looks like we are turning the corner in the wrong way. Perhaps the $350 range will hold, but I am expecting us to, at minimum, retest $300.

So that's my book and I don't wish to hide that I have a very obvious interest in it. But, apart from that, be careful. It looks like that was a dead cat bounce... and if not dead... critically ill cat.

Newbies...can't tell the difference between a cat and a honey badger.




1659. Post 9153984 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 10, 2014, 03:09:08 PM
we are "on a break" until i "get my act together"

fucking fuck fuck!

i'm gonna go be pissed off now.


well... wife left me today.

but hey its cool, i'm about to get to buy back lower!
Try winning her back with giving her some Bitcoin!
LOL, ya that will totally not make things worst.



i've got some damage control to do now, i'll give her a few days at her moms, and then i'll go begging for her forgiveness.

lifes not fair man....

Happens to me all the time. You just get a younger one the next time around.



1660. Post 9154804 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Coinbase wouldn't let me buy today. They claimed that they had sold their daily limit. That means Silicone Valley is buying.



1661. Post 9154923 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: Cheeseonastick on October 10, 2014, 04:37:52 PM
Coinbase wouldn't let me buy today. They claimed that they had sold their daily limit. That means silicone Valley is buying.

Choo choo.

Where does coinbase get their coins? Directly from miners? Or do they buy from an exchange?

They get most of them from customers selling (some of which are miners), but when they need extra liquidity, it is rumored they buy on Bitstamp.



1662. Post 9155025 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

We are on track to cross over the 12 HR moving average into bull market territory this weekend. That hasn't happened since Paypal announced they would be accepting bitcoin at one of their subsidiaries. At ~$400 we would see the first daily crossover since July 1. Of course that buy signal couldn't have been more wrong, so take market momentum as a guide, but a far from infallible one. What is more encouraging is that the order books are strongly bullish at Stamp and BFX. 

I'm keeping some powder dry, but looking for an opportunity to load up, possibly late Sat or Sunday when the banks are closed and buyers are out of fiat. I suspect soon that sellers and the people who made a quick $100/BTC on the latest dip/spike will run out of coins first, but time will tell.



1663. Post 9155045 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Has anyone else noticed that women tend to run out on you when you need their support the most? I see them as a luxury, something nice to have when times are good but unnecessary and actually a harmful distraction much of the time. 



1664. Post 9155272 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on October 10, 2014, 04:58:33 PM
We are on track to cross over the 12 HR moving average into bull market territory this weekend. That hasn't happened since Paypal announced they would be accepting bitcoin at one of their subsidiaries. At ~$400 we would see the first daily crossover since July 1. Of course that buy signal couldn't have been more wrong, so take market momentum as a guide, but a far from infallible one. What is more encouraging is that the order books are strongly bullish at Stamp and BFX. 

I'm keeping some powder dry, but looking for an opportunity to load up, possibly late Sat or Sunday when the banks are closed and buyers are out of fiat. I suspect soon that sellers and the people who made a quick $100/BTC on the latest dip/spike will run out of coins first, but time will tell.
What 12 HR means?

twelve hour moving average. an indicator of market momentum.



1665. Post 9155329 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: staffsan on October 10, 2014, 04:58:54 PM
Has anyone else noticed that the stupid and egocentric type of women tend to run out on you when you need their support the most? I see them as a luxury, something nice to have when times are good but unnecessary and actually a harmful distraction much of the time. 

Ftfy. There are nice girls, keep looking.

Nice girls, the real ones, tend to get married early and stay married. There is a difference in how men and women are wired. Women do not feel loyalty in the same way that men do. They may be loyal during tough times, but it is against their nature to do so and it is rare. Fortunately for me, my shelf life is longer than theirs and every time they bail because life doesn't meet their fairy tale expectations, I replace them with a newer model.



1666. Post 9155435 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: ClearLunatic on October 10, 2014, 05:25:17 PM
Has anyone else noticed that the stupid and egocentric type of women tend to run out on you when you need their support the most? I see them as a luxury, something nice to have when times are good but unnecessary and actually a harmful distraction much of the time. 

Ftfy. There are nice girls, keep looking.

Nice girls, the real ones, tend to get married early and stay married. There is a difference in how men and women are wired. Women do not feel loyalty in the same way that men do. They may be loyal during tough times, but it is against their nature to do so and it is rare. Fortunately for me, my shelf life is longer than theirs and every time they bail because life doesn't meet their fairy tale expectations, I replace them with a newer model.
lol you're a jackass and the reason you haven't met one of those 'loyal girls' is because you talk bullshit and whine about how we're not loyal, but in the mean time you'll say you can just 'replace us with a newer model'.

LOL. Must have hit a nerve. I wasn't always what you call a "jackass". A long string of women turned me into one. Blame your sisters.



1667. Post 9155553 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: Cheeseonastick on October 10, 2014, 05:34:56 PM
Has anyone else noticed that the stupid and egocentric type of women tend to run out on you when you need their support the most? I see them as a luxury, something nice to have when times are good but unnecessary and actually a harmful distraction much of the time. 

Ftfy. There are nice girls, keep looking.

Nice girls, the real ones, tend to get married early and stay married. There is a difference in how men and women are wired. Women do not feel loyalty in the same way that men do. They may be loyal during tough times, but it is against their nature to do so and it is rare. Fortunately for me, my shelf life is longer than theirs and every time they bail because life doesn't meet their fairy tale expectations, I replace them with a newer model.
lol you're a jackass and the reason you haven't met one of those 'loyal girls' is because you talk bullshit and whine about how we're not loyal, but in the mean time you'll say you can just 'replace us with a newer model'.

LOL. Must have hit a nerve. I wasn't always what you call a "jackass". A long string of women turned me into one. Blame your sisters.

You should find some butthurt girl who resents men because they keep dumping her.

I find them all the time. They're good for a one night stand. They never listen to the real reasons why they keep getting dumped. Women reward men for lying to them, and then claim all men are liars. No, Honey, just the ones you listen to.



1668. Post 9155577 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: btcney on October 10, 2014, 05:40:48 PM
Has anyone else noticed that the stupid and egocentric type of women tend to run out on you when you need their support the most? I see them as a luxury, something nice to have when times are good but unnecessary and actually a harmful distraction much of the time. 

Ftfy. There are nice girls, keep looking.

Nice girls, the real ones, tend to get married early and stay married. There is a difference in how men and women are wired. Women do not feel loyalty in the same way that men do. They may be loyal during tough times, but it is against their nature to do so and it is rare. Fortunately for me, my shelf life is longer than theirs and every time they bail because life doesn't meet their fairy tale expectations, I replace them with a newer model.

Replacing them with younger ones, that does not sound like loyalty at all to me.

Your misoginy wont exactly help you find a nice woman. My first tip to you would be to drop that.



LOL gold. Pay attention to what people do more than to what they say.



1669. Post 9155690 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: justusranvier on October 10, 2014, 05:47:35 PM
I wasn't always what you call a "jackass". A long string of women turned me into one. Blame your sisters.
This sounds like a "fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me" situation.

You only get to blame the first one. After that, it's your own fault for not learning from past mistakes and continuing to choose poorly.

Note this applies equally to women who blame the entire male gender for their repeated poor choices of partners.

Actually I was lied to my entire life as to the essential nature of women. The first one I could believe was a bad apple. Then the second one, even after being more cautious, turned out the same. By the third time, I started to get suspicious. The fourth made me seriously question my assumptions and the fifth was like finally swallowing the red pill after a lifetime in the Matrix.

I am not a misogynist. If all women are like that, then it's not their fault. It would be like hating snakes because they bite. It's not even fair to judge women by men's moral standards. I love women like I love my dog. I just don't play chess with either one.



1670. Post 9155849 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: mmitech on October 10, 2014, 06:08:10 PM
I wasn't always what you call a "jackass". A long string of women turned me into one. Blame your sisters.
This sounds like a "fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me" situation.

You only get to blame the first one. After that, it's your own fault for not learning from past mistakes and continuing to choose poorly.

Note this applies equally to women who blame the entire male gender for their repeated poor choices of partners.

or maybe these "insane" girls are sane and he is the insane one..

You know the cardinal rule about women, right? Hot, single, sane. Pick two.



1671. Post 9156151 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: sidhujag on October 10, 2014, 06:39:23 PM
I wasn't always what you call a "jackass". A long string of women turned me into one. Blame your sisters.
This sounds like a "fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me" situation.

You only get to blame the first one. After that, it's your own fault for not learning from past mistakes and continuing to choose poorly.

Note this applies equally to women who blame the entire male gender for their repeated poor choices of partners.

or maybe these "insane" girls are sane and he is the insane one..

You know the cardinal rule about women, right? Hot, single, sane. Pick two.

Funny.. but that defies logic since in order to be not single they must have had to be single at one point.. thus if they are hot and sane then they must have been single before thus rule broken...

Yeah, but at 44, it's tricky dating the 18 year-olds. Tricky, but not impossible  Wink

Basically what I am saying is that you usually only have three choices:
1) Steal a girl away from some other guy (a little dangerous, and if the girl will trade up to you, she will also likely trade up from you).
2) Take a homely girl, give her a makeover and take her to the gym. This is a lot of work and she can dump you for another guy after you made her hot.
3) Have insane hot sex with the crazy ones and then kick 'em to the curb sticky broke and confused.

Obviously I prefer method three.



1672. Post 9156348 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on October 10, 2014, 07:03:49 PM
Anybody any tips on meeting women? I'm turning 45 this winter, have no social life and haven't touched a woman in...well, a long time.
Pretty sure I'm still on your ignore list, but just in case: First, read The Game by Neil Strouss.  If you think this story is bullshit, then I can't help you. If it rings true, then you take the Red Pill and see how far down the rabbit hole goes.



1673. Post 9156472 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: China! on October 10, 2014, 07:18:25 PM


Typical sex bomb in the mind of every 18 year old U.S. girl.

http://www.youtube.com/user/billyjoeallen

LOL! Wow, somebody's checkin' up on me. Considering I've been in the Fire Department for six years and we have to stay clean shaven, that must be an old vid. Looks don't matter nearly as much if you are a guy. Neither does age.




1674. Post 9159175 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Game is much more than pick-up artistry. It may have been the PUAs who hacked the female brain, but what they discovered can be applied to all male-female relationships. In evolutionary psychology, women are programed to always be looking for somebody better. You can only stop this if you are someone she perceives as being clearly a high value guy. Some of this can be faked, but mostly you just gotta be better. Women have great bullshit detectors, but they were for an earlier time and a vastly different environment.

When you really become a better man, you don't even care so much if she leaves because you can get another one easily. Just don't put them on a pedestal. I don't care how hot she is, there's a dude somewhere that's sick of putting up with her shit.




1675. Post 9159218 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 11, 2014, 01:14:16 AM
here we go this is the start of the run up to 400

this is our history!!!

12 HR moving average crossover!  Train is leaving the station!



1676. Post 9165035 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: intighet on October 11, 2014, 03:37:34 PM
Game is much more than pick-up artistry.

Game basically guarantees that there will be at least a single surface between you and your mark, if not more, that will result in a relationship based on superficiality and strategy.

My advice would be to simply treat women like people, and relate to them the same way you might relate to your male friends. You would be surprised at how at ease this puts you, as you do not feel as if you need to perform, or seek attention, or gratify. Treat them as peers and equals and you will find commonality.

To show you how absurd that is, let's reverse it. Hey ladies, Men wan a woman to be genuine. That means no makeup, comfortable clothes, and short hair that's easier to manage. You don't have to exercise or eat healthy reasonably-sized meals because we don't want you to perform, seek attention or gratify. Get as fat as you like. We think that's hot.

You see how stupid your advice is? Be yourself, but be the best version of yourself.



1677. Post 9166077 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

I don't think the dumpers have any coins left at this price. They are waiting for higher prices and the bid depth is building so they will probably get them. The problem for bears is that higher prices signal a solid uptrend and they would be foolish to sell into that.

Of course there is manipulation going on, but some deep pockets are trying to manipulate the price up and others are trying to manipulate it down.

On fundamentals, it looks so cheap. Imagine if there was no exchanges, how hard would it be to mine bitcoin? Now you don't have to imagine how hard it is to get fiat. I get letters in the mail every day where banks, credit card companies and payday lenders are trying to give me money.

Supply and demand, Baby.



1678. Post 9166170 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 11, 2014, 06:11:43 PM
let's test that 4 k wall!

I hope it gets a test. That means I get a bunch more coins right in front of it! If you think bulls are out of fiat, think again. Central banks print it out of thin air. Other banks create it out of thin air also by fractional lending. Money supply (M3) is growing at an exponential rate and the only real taper is in the bitcoin source code.




1679. Post 9167098 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: brekyrself on October 11, 2014, 07:51:01 PM
7k buy wall on stamp?

Now gone?   Huh

Lift-off! I guess he decided to market buy.



1680. Post 9170536 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Something tells me the Chinese are not done giving us back our coins. Dumb-ass Chinks. They're going to be crying all next year.



1681. Post 9185009 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Anybody take a look at the order books on stamp and bfx? We're likely going to $400 this week. Maybe today.



1682. Post 9185837 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: Jybrael on October 13, 2014, 02:16:08 PM
Maybe this year wasn't meant to be the year it goes back up to 1000.

I would be really surprised if it did return that quickly. It took 11 months to hit what I hope is the bottom so it could easily take another 11 months to return if not more, of course that's only a pit stop on the way to much higher. 

I'm not calling a bottom but I am short term bullish. There is a 40% chance of a retest of $300, IMHO.



1683. Post 9186404 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: klondike_bar on October 13, 2014, 03:02:51 PM
THE BEARWHALE BULLWHALE

Here's a thought - what if the bearwhale was actually a bullwhale?

1) dump some coins and put a massive 30k sell order wall at $300
2) purchase some long position calls on bitfinex or elsewhere.
3) eat it away using at least one other account, including an 11k purchase. Includes buying any coins being sold below $300.
4) remove the sell order for the last ~10k coins
5) watch the markets increase by 50% in a week, while still holding most of the original number of coins, plus extremely high-profit calls.

seems like by sacrificing ~10k coins to others at $300, the bullwhale effectively reversed the price decline, increasing the value of the remaining coins and probably selling the call positions for a tremendous profit.

is this feasible, or is the bearwhale just a bearwhale?

Occam's Razor. Most likely just a bearwhale. He lost over $1.7 million in market value and there hasn't been enough volume since then to make it likely he bought back in on margin. He couldn't have known $275 was the final bottom. It still might not be. How could he have known the market could absorb that many coins and not even slow down the rebound? Sure, we could be the toys of billionaires, but even billionaires have to compete with each other.



1684. Post 9186487 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on October 13, 2014, 03:36:30 PM
Ask wall on huobi splitting and moving down! She's real!
The 500 wall put up first was pulled as soon as it was touched, put back up as soon as there was some room but I doubt it will stay that big if its touched again. Who'd have thunk 300 euro would have so much resistance Wink

I knew those dumb-ass Chinese weren't going to stop until they gave us back all our coins!  I love it! We get a second shot at dirt cheap BTC!!



1685. Post 9186803 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

The order book on HooBoy is massively bearish in direct contrast to BFX and Stamp. It is a significant Xfer of coins from East back to West. This is a very good long term development even though it might kill our rally for a day or twelve. 



1686. Post 9187282 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Apparently the idiot ChiComs haven't mastered the art of this whole "buy low sell high" thing. LOL. Six months from now they'll be buying back at a huge loss. Three generations of Communism has turned the highest I.Q. people in the world (edit: except for Ashkenazi Jews) into morons.



1687. Post 9188067 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: WeltMaster on October 13, 2014, 05:29:33 PM
Apparently the idiot ChiComs haven't mastered the art of this whole "buy low sell high" thing. LOL. Six months from now they'll be buying back at a huge loss. Three generations of Communism has turned the highest I.Q. people in the world (edit: except for Ashkenazi Jews) into morons.

>not realising Communism is a Jewish creation

goyim pls

Sure I do, but it's a political movement based on a flawed (labor) theory of value. It was discredited by William Stanley Jevons (among others) when the concept of marginal utility was developed. Austrian Economics is also a Jewish creation and it will prove to be much more durable than communism.



1688. Post 9193046 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Huobi order book has dramatically changed. It is still bearish, but barely so. There may be some life left in this rally after all.



1689. Post 9206001 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

A lottery ticket costs $2.00. I just put in an order for 100BTC at $0.02.  The odds of bitcoin ever going down that low are very bad, but not nearly as bad as the Lotto. 



1690. Post 9374536 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

The U.S. dollar strengthened today against all other major currencies because the Fed announced the end of its POMO bond buying program. This of course means that bitcoin along with all major commodities and most equities is going to go down in dollar terms.

What savvy Fed watchers understand is that those idiots only do something right by accident and as soon as the markets go down far enough, they ramp up the printing presses. There is not one credible inflation hawk on the board and so this is what we call a "buying opportunity".

I'm actually hoping for another test of $300 on high volume because that would make a good double bottom and a beginning to what I am fairly certain will be called by historians the Great Bitcoin Bull Market of 2015.

This is the hardest part of a really terrible bear market and nobody really knows how much longer it will last, but when the worm turns, the few who had the courage and brains to ride it out will have one hell of a story to tell.




1691. Post 9376813 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Nobody who had ever bought and held for two years has ever had to cut their losses.

think about that.



1692. Post 9377184 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

If I were a billionaire hedge fund manager, I'd take this measly little $7 BBN market and hold it down with massive short positions until I had made all my deals with miners to acquire my stake.  I suspect the real action is not on the exchanges at all.

It seems to me that it's likely going to get worse before it gets better.



1693. Post 9377254 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 30, 2014, 03:01:20 AM
If I were a billionaire hedge fund manager, I'd take this measly little $7 BBN market and hold it down with massive short positions until I had made all my deals with miners to acquire my stake.  I suspect the real action is not on the exchanges at all.

It seems to me that it's likely going to get worse before it gets better.

I have been saying that to my closest friend for a while now...

this is the part where it gets better imo.

I'm actually encouraged that the market is dropping so quickly after the $275 crash/ $415 bounce. We need a retest of $300 sooner rather than later and on high volume. If it trickles down, it's likely to go lower and then stay lower. I suspect there is more support near $300 than the order book shows, so bring on the dumping and let the battle begin!



1694. Post 9457233 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: Unpredictable on November 06, 2014, 02:18:58 PM
I like this slow creeping up to 350$ much more than huge jump and then crash Smiley . I think this price climb is worth more Smiley.

Double bottom first.

I agree, but I could so easily be wrong. I missed the train from $400 up to $680 the first time and it was a terrible feeling. At these prices, you can ride it up if it rockets or double up on the double dip. Max out the credit cards and hit the loan sharks on another dip to $300. There's no way Bitcoin should have a market cap <25% of What's App. Theses are the days of accumulating positions that lead to generational wealth.



1695. Post 9457376 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: btcney on November 06, 2014, 02:33:27 PM
http://www.cityam.com/1415215686/bitcoin-bust-why-investors-should-abandon-doomed-cryptocurrency

 Shocked Shocked Shocked  Angry Angry

There's no such thing as a "natural monopoly". Monopolies were created by governments and do not arise in the free market absent government intervention. One of the things I love about Bitcoin is how it validates Austrian Economic theory to the consternation of more conventional economic theorists. Look, even electric companies face competition, even when there are no economies of scale to run redundant power lines. There is alternative forms of power generation and substitutes. So it is not just direct or even indirect competition that restrains dominant market players but just the threat of potential competition.

What happens is that the moment a dominant market players begins to charge higher than free market prices, the competitors begin to come online. You can be the 800 pound gorilla in the room only as long as you act like you are not one.



1696. Post 9457395 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: Thomas-s on November 06, 2014, 02:57:32 PM

 Monopolies were created by governments and do not arise in the free market absent government intervention
Not sure if serious.

Deadly serious. I'm betting my life savings on it. Economies of scale simply mean that competition is limited to players with large amounts of capital. The more profitable some business is, the more it attracts other large players with sufficient capital to compete. That's why it's called "capitalism" boys and girls.



1697. Post 9457580 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: Thomas-s on November 06, 2014, 02:59:26 PM

Deadly serious. I'm betting my life savings on it.
I don't get it, there are literally hundreds of examples for monopolies in free markets.

No there aren't. Dig under the surface and you can find government intervention everywhere. Take Microsoft for example. It is far from a monopoly even in the Operating system space, but Bill Gate's wealth is largely dependent on taxpayer-supported copyright, patent and trademark enforcement "intellectual property".  MS even has a lobying firm on K street in Washington D.C. to make sure copyright enforcement is built into trade treaties. Gates isn't even a good technologist. He's the son of a lawyer who re-marketed some crap he bought for a few thousand dollars called "Quick and Dirty Operating System" to IBM and  the government did most of the rest.



1698. Post 9457703 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: Elwar on November 06, 2014, 03:12:18 PM

Deadly serious. I'm betting my life savings on it.
I don't get it, there are literally hundreds of examples for monopolies in free markets.



one example?


(I do know of just one)

I'll bite. What is it? Even the State itself, the ultimate monopoly, faces competition. People who seek to externalize costs soon find themselves at odds with most of the vast body of humanity.



1699. Post 9457823 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 06, 2014, 03:35:57 PM
No there aren't. Dig under the surface and you can find government intervention everywhere. Take Microsoft for example. It is far from a monopoly even in the Operating system space, but Bill Gate's wealth is largely dependent on taxpayer-supported copyright, patent and trademark enforcement "intellectual property".  MS even has a lobying firm on K street in Washington D.C. to make sure copyright enforcement is built into trade treaties. Gates isn't even a good technologist. He's the son of a lawyer who re-marketed some crap he bought for a few thousand dollars called "Quick and Dirty Operating System" to IBM and  the government did most of the rest.

Quite correct.  Indeed there cannot be monopolies in a free market, by definition of the terms.

The confusion is that libertarians read "free" as "unregulated" (or "laissez-faire"), whereas it means "where suppliers and customers can freely enter the market and choose each other".   Unfortunately, unregulated markets quickly degenerate to monopolies or oligopolies, because the dominant suppliers will use their economic power (including by buying governments) to exclude competition and lock their customers in.

Microsoft is a good example: in the absence or regulations requiring open document format and interoperability, they were able to lock billions of users into their proprietary format.



On the contrary, Good Professor. It's Statist who conflate "regulated" with "state-regulated". Regulation is too important to be left to governments. It's in the economic best interest of industries to self-regulate when they are not tempted to externalize costs with the help of the State.



1700. Post 9457884 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: Thomas-s on November 06, 2014, 03:44:16 PM
380 inc.

Bullish pennant. You may be close.



1701. Post 9457918 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on November 06, 2014, 03:48:55 PM
...
On the contrary, Good Professor. It's Statist who conflate "regulated" with "state-regulated". Regulation is too important to be left to governments. It's in the economic best interest of industries to self-regulate when they are not tempted to externalize costs with the help of the State.

And the difference between "no regulation" and "self-regulation" is?

Underwriter Laboratories is a good example. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UL_%28safety_organization%29 Industries are incentivized to adopt standard best practices.



1702. Post 9458223 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on November 06, 2014, 03:57:47 PM
...
On the contrary, Good Professor. It's Statist who conflate "regulated" with "state-regulated". Regulation is too important to be left to governments. It's in the economic best interest of industries to self-regulate when they are not tempted to externalize costs with the help of the State.

And the difference between "no regulation" and "self-regulation" is?

Underwriter Laboratories is a good example. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UL_%28safety_organization%29 Industries are incentivized to adopt standard best practices.

I asked for the difference between self-regulation and no regulation.
You gave me a link to this:
"UL is one of several companies approved to perform safety testing by the US federal agency Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)."
I'd like an answer, not a non-sequitur.


In your factory fire example, you need to understand that employers face competition for labor the same way workers face competition for jobs. A worker would choose to work in a safe workplace, all things else being equal. Farmers were maiming themselves with their own machinery in their own fields at the same time, but no government rescue there. Why? Because maybe a factory fire makes a good story. You need a bad guy for conflict and drama. To argue that workplace safety is a constant tension between higher productivity and safety until new practices and technology ratchet the standards higher is kind of boring.



1703. Post 9461971 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on November 06, 2014, 04:39:29 PM

Yes, hungry girls will work unsafe, degrading jobs because need trumps everything else.  What point are you trying to make?  That we should return to the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory days?  Sweatshops?  Child labor?  
Or are you asking for greater regulation of farm equipment safety?

Yes, factory girls work in less than ideal environments because like all of us, they take what they feel is the best of their available options. You seem to think that taking options away from people helps them. That doesn't make sense. That's what government regulation does: takes options away from people.

So you try to argue that employers are forced to make workers slave away in death-trap work places because they have to compete with other employers who do the same and if only Mommy Government could disrupt the Nash equilibrium, then everyone would be better off. You are not making the right comparisons. Governments do not give people better options. A growing economy that gives workers more choices for employment gives people better options. Sustainably growing economies are the result of capital formation (savings), innovation and risk-taking on the part of entrepreneurs. Were State-owned factories is the Soviet union models for efficiency and safety? To ask is to answer.



1704. Post 9481715 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

looking at the order books, BFX and Stamp are bullish and Huobi is bearish. At some unknown point in the Future, the Chinese will either start buying again or run out of coins. When that happens it's off to the races.



1705. Post 9483554 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on November 08, 2014, 11:57:08 PM
The way I see it:  We don't see much real buying pressure in this market anymore (while there's plenty of potential selling pressure).
The only panic buying lately was the $275-$415 obvious bounce after the biggest flash crash yet during the dumps from $680.

The $275 was a pretty obvious local bottom: convergence of a bunch of important trend lines + previous bubble's peak + biggest flash crash yet.

If the weak buying pressure doesn't allow us to have real breakouts and real rallies, average joes and big whales (and god knows there are a lot of them) will panic and we will cut through previous support like a hot knife through butter.

...And there is all the time in the world for that.


There is a natural tendency for price to go up because stable prices make the network more valuable and when it becomes more valuable, then bitcoins become more valuable which makes the price go up until the instability in prices causes a pull-back.

A look at the order books shows growing support on Stamp and especially BFX. This support is slowly getting bigger and moving higher. I just know that I can always buy more coins if it goes down, but there are a finite amount of coins if this really is the bottom. upside potential trumps downside risk.



1706. Post 9488431 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

Somebody bringing the heat on a Sunday morning. Prolly looking for a bargain and got impatient. This could be fun if we're still in this uptrend when the banks open tomorrow.



1707. Post 9488497 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

Quote from: edwardspitz on November 09, 2014, 03:28:48 PM
4.2 k BTC ask wall @ Bitfinex  Shocked

fake sell

Yes. It has been split up. Maybe the first 1k wall @ 352 is "real".

2K market buy on BFX!



1708. Post 9489252 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 09, 2014, 04:38:57 PM
In this market, you either buy or you get bought from.

Sure as hell looking like a bullish pennant. This ride ain't over.



1709. Post 9494746 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

You bears gotta be feeling the squeeze in your shorts now. Don't worry. I have a few coins to sell you ~$375 to cover  Wink



1710. Post 9495975 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

this 1500 coin buy wall on BFX is going to make the trend stay bullish for a bit.



1711. Post 9499884 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

train kep--rollin' all night long!



1712. Post 9500075 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

LOL there's 539 coins total for sale on the Huobi order book. They are out of bitcoins to dump! This short squeeze is going to be epic.



1713. Post 9501880 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on November 10, 2014, 10:23:04 PM
I'm not sure who's more pathetic, those who post trains and rockets with every $10 rise or those who post sinking ships and spilled drinks with every $5 dip.

Sigh.  Undecided

That was unlikely a top. Tops are parabolic. It's just another opportunity to get back on the train and to shake out the wankers.



1714. Post 9505452 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

If price can manage to stay around $370 overnight, then we could see $400 again this week! The daily moving average just turned positive so we are green for the 24 hr, 12 hr, 6 hr, 4 her, 2 hr and 1 hr moving averages. This is some serious momentum. Order books still look bullish. CCMF!



1715. Post 9521546 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

What the hell is happening? I woke up in a new tax bracket!

It's a short squeeeeeeeeeeze!!!! and the bear butthurt is sweet sweet nectar.



1716. Post 9527223 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Holy crap! I have 9 coins left to sell before I have to dip into cold storage! over 15% in less than 24 HRs!!!!!!

it's going to be a very merry Christmas  Grin Grin



1717. Post 9527297 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Oh, just in case nobody's said it in a couple of pages CCMF!



1718. Post 9527499 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

So I wonder what Professor Bitcorn is going to say about this? How many bears were force liquidated today? I smoked 2 packs of cigarettes.



1719. Post 9537336 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: nakaone on November 13, 2014, 11:31:11 PM
lol at that shakeout


ah btw hodl + popcorn these days seems to be quite a solid strategy.
don't worry about the dumpers. They are the same people buying back in @ $500.

the only thing to worry about is if the 4HR moving average turns negative. then bail, wait for it to turn positive again and $$$$$$. rinse and repeat.



1720. Post 9594384 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.33h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 19, 2014, 06:18:42 PM

Civil servants do not get a cut of the money from the auction; that money goes to the Treasury (or to some general fund for the public good).  They are motivated by gold stars in their resumé, that eventually lead to promotions.  Catching and convicting criminals yields gold stars for all involved.  Carrying out a smooth auction of a weird item, with no complaints of bad press,  also yields gold stars.  They do not care if the auction messes the market or gets a lousy price, but they worry about doing something stupid that could stain their resumés -- such as auctioning a bunch of seized game tickets after the game, or auctioning so much stuff at one time that they cannot get enough bidders for it.

Civil servants are not immune from influence ranging from flattery to bribes. Bureaucrats act in their own perceived best interests just like everybody else does. They are not angels. They are not perfectly impartial. They are human, and when the personal benefits outweigh the personal costs for a given official action, they are likely to take it.

People with faulty ideology are capable of great evil in service to their false gods. They commit that evil with a clear conscience and that's what makes them so dangerous.



1721. Post 9594485 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.33h):

It doesn't matter if you use moving averages or not, we have not had a double bottom because the second dip had far less volume and it should have had more.  $300 is likely to be retested and it may not hold.

I don't personally care either way because I have a pile of coins to sell if it goes up and a pile of cash to trade if it goes down. What I am most afraid of is a slow grind down and a slog through resistance on low volume. If that happens, then the next stop down is ~270.




1722. Post 9594666 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.33h):

Quote from: samsonn25 on November 19, 2014, 06:49:34 PM
The people who bough the seized bitcoins in the first auction in July when price was around $650 should double-down.  If they indeed want to cost-average down.

Those coins have prolly already been sold and part of the reason why we are trading at this level now.



1723. Post 9597360 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.33h):

Quote from: Le Happy Merchant on November 19, 2014, 11:54:13 PM
So this is one hell of a consolidation. Most beautiful chart pattern I have seen in Bitcoin.

It's called a "descending wedge" and I've seen them many times. They almost always break lower.



1724. Post 9597542 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.33h):

Quote from: fabrizio123 on November 20, 2014, 01:02:25 AM
So this is one hell of a consolidation. Most beautiful chart pattern I have seen in Bitcoin.

It's called a "descending wedge" and I've seen them many times. They almost always break lower.
What you mean? I know that descending wedge is a bullish sign while rising wedge is bearish

My bad. "descending triangle". I just know I've seen them end badly a lot.



1725. Post 9598525 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.33h):

we could end this dumping in a week if we all just sell now, buy back @$300 for a successful retest of support. You would increase your coin stash and the great bull market of 2015 could start early. If we let the price grind down, we'll all be too broke for a successful double bottom and support won't hold. This has happened so many times. When will we figure it out?



1726. Post 9601034 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.33h):

Quote from: janos666 on November 20, 2014, 08:32:23 AM
we could end this dumping in a week if we all just sell now, buy back @$300 for a successful retest of support. You would increase your coin stash and the great bull market of 2015 could start early. If we let the price grind down, we'll all be too broke for a successful double bottom and support won't hold. This has happened so many times. When will we figure it out?

You think there's no trend reversal to uptrend until we double bottom @$300? Must another whale sacrifice his fortune for the general good?

In my opinion, there was a double bottom already in terms of moving averages + we had a little over-exaggerated dip on top of the first bottom thanks to the ManBearWall anomaly. But the market didn't seem to care about that, so I was sitting here, waiting to panic-sell... And now I am waiting to panic-buy with some profit. Grin

yeah, good luck with that.



1727. Post 9711835 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

If there is no volatility, then we have done our job. Bitcoin has no central bankers so the money supply is determined by day traders. We profit from volatility by eating it. This is the time for the successful day traders to take a well-earned break.

This is a superior system to central banking because day traders only get paid when we do our job well. Not only that but we lose money when we do it poorly. Eventually the poor traders give all their money to the good traders.and the good traders make the system more stable, buying when there is too much liquidity and selling when there is not enough.

In the free market, every problem is an opportunity for someone.



1728. Post 9712439 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

There seems to be an uncoupling between bfx and stamp. a person with accounts at both exchanges could do a compression trade (selling on BFX and buying on stamp), betting that eventually they will converge again.



1729. Post 9713965 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

November 12 I had a sell order at BFX for $475.000 which the price hit, but there were so many other sellers at the exact same price that my order did not fill!!!  Huh



1730. Post 9714003 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on December 02, 2014, 04:00:48 AM
November 12 I had a sell order at BFX for $475.000 which the price hit, but there were so many other sellers at the exact same price that my order did not fill!!!  Huh

Top ticked it to the fraction of a penny and no pay off. So if anybody's wondering why I'm not buying now it's because I don't have those profits to re-invest. Now I have to wait for a lower price (if we even get one) before increasing my stash.



1731. Post 9727247 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on December 03, 2014, 12:33:47 PM

Their argument is that it's now $380 instead of $640??

Right, that's just fucking great logic.
If anything that will trigger more players to bid higher then the market price now when they got a chance to get it cheap.
Fucking broken logic, did a woman done came up with this? Cheesy

About the other 90k coins, we don't know what time these will go off on auction and the price could EASILY be more then $400 at that time

Teh Bitcoin has been pumping all week in preparation for this auction. The bit powers that be don't want them auction coins going too cheap. This is my theory

Volume tells the story. Price was drifting higher all week and may continue to do so, but without much enthusiasm. Volume has been tapering off. I'll consider myself lucky to get in a short position near $390 before the buying stops entirely. I'm happy the gov won't get much for their stolen coins.



1732. Post 9727579 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on December 03, 2014, 12:59:10 PM

Volume tells the story. Price was drifting higher all week and may continue to do so, but without much enthusiasm. Volume has been tapering off. I'll consider myself lucky to get in a short position near $390 before the buying stops entirely. I'm happy the gov won't get much for their stolen coins.

You opened a short at $390?

What the fuck has happend? Why have you gone insane? Was it the fact that you missed that $475 sell or whatever it was?
I swear to god everybody who's losing significant potential winnings are fucking losing it, becoming poison... I pray to god I'll not be one of those.

Weren't you going x20 short like a week ago? What has changed?

I'm only slightly short, looking for a good place to short some more. Of course if you count the coins I have in cold storage, I'm always long- but that's the difference between a trading position and an investment.



1733. Post 9731872 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: fff13 on December 03, 2014, 06:17:24 PM
Could notlambchop be TERA's alter ego??

 Shocked

Not a chance. TERA was a master trader and I wish she was still here. I learned a lot from her.



1734. Post 9732119 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

There has been a pattern that has repeated three times in this bear market and is in the process of repeating again, where there is a crash, a bounce, a pause, a spike, a second bounce at a much higher level and then a slow dissipation of all upward momentum leading to the next crash. We are in the dissipation period now. The key thing to watch for is the volume as the price approaches support levels on the way down. Low volume= very bad. Stay in cash even if you close your short positions. High volume means the possibility of a double bottom.

I've lost a few houses worth of money identifying this pattern, so a wise person should learn from my mistakes. The fact that it was money I made on the way up is some consolation. Still, opportunity lost is opportunity lost.



1735. Post 9732192 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: hdbuck on December 03, 2014, 10:10:33 PM
There has been a pattern that has repeated three times in this bear market and is in the process of repeating again, where there is a crash, a bounce, a pause, a spike, a second bounce at a much higher level and then a slow dissipation of all upward momentum leading to the next crash. We are in the dissipation period now. The key thing to watch for is the volume as the price approaches support levels on the way down. Low volume= very bad. Stay in cash even if you close your short positions. High volume means the possibility of a double bottom.

I've lost a few houses worth of money identifying this pattern, so a wise person should learn from my mistakes. The fact that it was money I made on the way up is some consolation. Still, opportunity lost is opportunity lost.

you are short now?

For the first time in four years, I am margin short and looking for slightly higher prices just to sell more on margin. I have the ability to sell a lot more. It's gonna have to get worse before it gets much better.



1736. Post 9732441 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: inca on December 03, 2014, 10:38:37 PM
There has been a pattern that has repeated three times in this bear market and is in the process of repeating again, where there is a crash, a bounce, a pause, a spike, a second bounce at a much higher level and then a slow dissipation of all upward momentum leading to the next crash. We are in the dissipation period now. The key thing to watch for is the volume as the price approaches support levels on the way down. Low volume= very bad. Stay in cash even if you close your short positions. High volume means the possibility of a double bottom.

I've lost a few houses worth of money identifying this pattern, so a wise person should learn from my mistakes. The fact that it was money I made on the way up is some consolation. Still, opportunity lost is opportunity lost.

you are short now?

For the first time in four years, I am margin short and looking for slightly higher prices just to sell more on margin. I have the ability to sell a lot more. It's gonna have to get worse before it gets much better.

Why does it have to get a lot worse? There has been a nearly one year long bear market already. The price is barely a third of the previous high even now.

1w macd about to go green.

Good luck shorting!

It has to get worse because of us! Good traders buy low and sell high, reducing volatility. We bought too high and increased volatility, scaring away the hedge funds and big money that was supposed to fuel the next rally. Bitcoin is a medium of exchange and a unit of account, but thanks to those of us who sold far too little at the top, it is a piss poor store of value. We didn't have enough profits to re-invest during the bear market. I blame myself among others.



1737. Post 9732510 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: inca on December 03, 2014, 10:55:34 PM

Either the price of btc rises significantly in the next 24 months or it fails. I see no signs of failure so far.

I agree. I'm still a long term bull, or I'd be dumping my cold storage also and not just my trading stash. 24 months is an eternity in bitcoin time. A lot can happen between now and then.



1738. Post 9737940 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 04, 2014, 01:41:15 PM
"Dollar averaging" is not a rational thing to do, it is only a psychological pacifier, right?

If one bought 100 coins at 800$, buying 100 more at 400$ does not compensate or alleviate the loss of the first buy.  It only mixes a vexing mistake with a minor mistake to make a double dose of a medium-strength mistake.  The loss from the first buy is still there.  Right?

Quite true. The number of coins one owns is irrelevant. It's the Return on Investment that matters, and the only way to be sure of that is to wait until someone else finds the bottom and jump in after the market has clearly turned bullish.

I'm starting to wonder if the Bearwhale will get the last laugh.



1739. Post 9738126 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Griping about manipulation is stupid and pointless. If someone is driving the price down just to buy, then you benefit from temporarily lower prices.

the reason there is less demand is because market participants correctly (IMHO) anticipate that there are too many holders who will sell if the price goes just a hundred or two higher. Price has to go lower to attract new money. We are just taking it from each other at this point.

We need new money and that means we need lower prices. The retail money won't really start pouring in until after the rally is well under way and it hasn't even started yet.



1740. Post 9738811 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: macsga on December 04, 2014, 02:17:19 PM
The fiat & BTC poor trolls are out in force today.
They must be terrified incase the price rises after this auction.

It's so bitter I can almost taste the lemon.

CCMF soon. 850 BTC wall buy on Finex.

Howz that workin' out for you so far?



1741. Post 9739289 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: macsga on December 04, 2014, 04:04:12 PM
The fiat & BTC poor trolls are out in force today.
They must be terrified incase the price rises after this auction.

It's so bitter I can almost taste the lemon.

CCMF soon. 850 BTC wall buy on Finex.

Howz that workin' out for you so far?
Just fine. I'm HODLing as usual. Grin

The thing that worries me about hodlers (and I was one) is that you aren't going to have much money to help stop the crash because you didn't sell anything at the higher level.



1742. Post 9739352 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Six hour moving average just crossed. Even though I'm short, I really didn't expect it to go down so far so fast. I need a higher price so I can short some more.



1743. Post 9740327 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: dreamspark on December 04, 2014, 04:47:16 PM
Six hour moving average just crossed. Even though I'm short, I really didn't expect it to go down so far so fast. I need a higher price so I can short some more.

So far so fast? Were $18 over the last five days. I used to enjoy your postings until you got crazy and missed the May run up. Sounds like much of the same talk now as then. Telling people they needed to sell now and help you defend the bottom etc. The fact that you think we need more people to loose money (the price going down) to attract new investors is just crazy. Investor - "That Bitcoin thing I was thinking about investing in just hit $100 down from an ATH of $1200, seems like a great investment to me" /s. Other than the fact your clearly trying to increase your stash I just don't understand where your coming from.

The thing that worries me about hodlers (and I was one) is that you aren't going to have much money to help stop the crash because you didn't sell anything at the higher level.

The crash wouldn't even start if people didn't sell, hodlers selling to defend the bottom just increases the pace and depth of the drop (if there is one) scaring even more investors away.

I did miss the runup, but I missed the crash back down also. Obviously I'll get another crack at it and so will everyone else who didn't fall for that bull trap.

Look, I'm still a long term bull, but You gotta admit that the near term momentum is down and this way I'll have more fiat to shore up support. What scares investers away (as opposed to traders) is volatility. We have failed to punish volatility sufficiently. To do that we need to sell when the price goes up as well as buy when it goes down.



1744. Post 9740468 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: jonoiv on December 04, 2014, 05:59:59 PM
about 1 hour to lift off.  Cool

the launch has been delayed due to inclement weather.

Y'all should be happy I'm shorting. If there is a crash, I'll be there to cover my put and if it goes up from here, I'll be force liquidated, driving the price even higher.



1745. Post 9740593 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: macsga on December 04, 2014, 06:32:01 PM
about 1 hour to lift off.  Cool

the launch has been delayed due to inclement weather.

Y'all should be happy I'm shorting. If there is a crash, I'll be there to cover my put and if it goes up from here, I'll be force liquidated, driving the price even higher.

Out of curiosity; what's the magnitude of coins you're trading? 10s / 100s / more?

I only have a 50 coin short in right now. If we go back up in the 380s or 90s in the next week, I'll double it. I'll be the first to admit that I'm a shitty day trader, so I'm not going to make any big moves until I have some more confidence in my abilities.

I have substantially more in cold storage, so I actually hope I'm wrong about a retest of ~$300 support. I'll make money either way. I suspect better traders than me are trading these small bounces, betting on a rebound, giving bulls more rope to hang themselves with.



1746. Post 9740702 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: Sellman on December 04, 2014, 06:41:46 PM
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2014/12/04/50000-bitcoins-seized-in-silk-road-bust-up-for-auction


"My expectation is that most bids will be aggressively to the downside in the hope of getting a post-Black Friday bargain," he wrote.

Yeah, but you only need one sucker to meet your price. I hope the feds get next to nothing. and I hope the bidders lose money also. I don't approve of buying stolen property. This is somewhat in conflict with my hopes of a price recovery relatively soon, so I guess I can live with any outcome.



1747. Post 9740801 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 04, 2014, 06:59:20 PM

BillieJoeAllen who told us about the S-Curve in spring and that we are on our direct way to 250000$ coins.
BillieJoeAllen who insulted everybody massively that shorted@800$
BillieJoeAllen who was knee deep in BTC @6-700$ that he even couldn´t afford to pay his electric bills.
BillieJoeAllen who maxed out all his credit cards and the ones form his girlfriend to buy cheap BTC @ ~5-600$
BillieJoeAllen who missed the massive runup in May to 680$
...
...
...
BillieJoeAllen who is now shorting@370-380$.... and talking his book...

We´ll see how that works out!
Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Yeah, I'm also the guy who has money to lose because I bought in @ $10 four years ago. I'm not selling anything or trying to convince anyone of anything. I'm just calling it how I see it and time will tell.

The silver lining is that I'll have no capital gains to declare this year  Tongue



1748. Post 9740815 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: jonoiv on December 04, 2014, 05:59:59 PM
about 1 hour to lift off.  Cool

still waiting.

edit: ~$0.75 so far. what does it have to rise to be considered a successful launch? I'm making popcorn.



1749. Post 9740904 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: jonoiv on December 04, 2014, 07:14:55 PM
about 1 hour to lift off.  Cool

still waiting.

edit: ~$0.75 so far. what does it have to rise to be considered a successful launch? I'm making popcorn.

Don't worry, it may be delayed, but you will get liquidated, i'm sure of that Smiley

It would have to spike to $518 if I don't post additional margin (which I can easily). I'm pretty sure I'll have plenty of time to cut my losses if I am wrong before getting a margin call.

a buck fifty melt up (so far) on no volume doesn't tell us very much.



1750. Post 9740936 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: virtuexru on December 04, 2014, 07:23:23 PM
about 1 hour to lift off.  Cool

still waiting.

edit: ~$0.75 so far. what does it have to rise to be considered a successful launch? I'm making popcorn.

Don't worry, it may be delayed, but you will get liquidated, i'm sure of that Smiley

It would have to spike to $518 if I don't post additional margin (which I can easily). I'm pretty sure I'll have plenty of time to cut my losses if I am wrong before getting a margin call.

People who are day-trading the BTC market are doing it wrong. Lol.

You should try it. The swap rate is very attractive. I'm only paying $0.25/day to borrow 50 coins. I can afford to wait and see how this plays out.



1751. Post 9741020 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: dreamspark on December 04, 2014, 07:29:44 PM

You should try it. The swap rate is very attractive. I'm only paying $0.25/day to borrow 50 coins. I can afford to wait and see how this plays out.

The swap rate is attractive, not quite as nice as watching that P/L $ figure sink $50 further into the red for every dollar the market climbs  Grin

Compared to watching my net worth plummet for the last year it's not so bad. My net worth rises substantially more than $50 for every $1 up so I'm good.  Wink



1752. Post 9741085 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: jonoiv on December 04, 2014, 07:34:05 PM


I personally would like it if you did option 1, please do that, so when you're in stuck in the $500 range waiting for the "price crash" that never happens, you will keep sending more and more in the vain hope you will get to close the short in profit.    

2 points;

1. It's going to rally sooner or later this month, and sub $380 will be as extinct as a magicMexican dinosaur, leaving you up shit creek without a paddle.
2. & If you have so much in reserve, why are you begging for BTC in your signature?

Why the hostility? Are you nervous? I also think there will be a rally in a month more or less. I just think it'll go down first.

and I put my address in my signature because someone might give me coins. duh.



1753. Post 9741135 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Boom! somebody flinched on BFX. only fifty coins so far, but compared to this no volume crap, it's the first glitch in the "launch".



1754. Post 9741448 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 04, 2014, 08:03:22 PM
Blitz. Id be inclined to think that theyre dime a dozen kind of folks.
Right, I chose the wrong phrase. I meant to say they're the same type that obsess over 1m charts, wasting their mental energy.

Chill. It's just entertainment. It's the 4 and 6 HR charts that I primarily use. Playing small swings on the 15 min charts just generates fees for the exchanges, not profits.

I wonder how soon SR auction coins could be dumped on the exchanges? Hypothetically, of course. I don't think anyone has ever flipped auction merchandise for a quick profit.



1755. Post 9741538 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Some launch. This rocket is looking more like a hover craft.



1756. Post 9741669 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: jonoiv on December 04, 2014, 08:42:32 PM
Some launch. This rocket is looking more like a hover craft.

Hovering way above where you want it to be Smiley

above, but not way above. I expect the crash to take a while. right now, $100K will move the price up a buck or down $4.00 on BFX. not good odds in your favor.  



1757. Post 9741759 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 04, 2014, 08:56:20 PM


Welcome back, my friend.



1758. Post 9741802 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: inca on December 04, 2014, 08:50:38 PM
Some launch. This rocket is looking more like a hover craft.

Hovering way above where you want it to be Smiley

above, but not way above. I expect the crash to take a while. right ow, $100K will move the price up a buck or down $4.00 on BFX. not good odds in your favor.  

You should know a lot better that the orderbooks are meaningless on BTC exchanges if you are slinging any serious amount of money around using leverage.

well, I don't consider 50 coins serious and those order books just accurately predicted a $1.50 drop, $75 for me.



1759. Post 9741860 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

I was just thinking of a terrible rom-com movie called "Failure to Launch" with Sarah Jessica Horseface and Mathew McSomethingScottish. I don't know why.

What are the odds bulls can get the 1 HR moving average to go green before the Chinese wake up? I want to double up my short position.



1760. Post 9741971 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.36h):

Quote from: jonoiv on December 04, 2014, 09:11:56 PM
I was just thinking of a terrible rom-com movie called "Failure to Launch" with Sarah Jessica Horseface and Mathew McSomethingScottish. I don't know why.

Your TA?

No ?  have nothing ?  just a hunch?
I already posted my reasoning. There is a patteren of crash, bounce, pause, spike, second bounce, and then complete dissipation of all upward momentum. The patterns has repeated three times in this bear market and is in the process of repeating again. We are in the dissipation phase, prior to the next crash.

Don't blame the weatherman for the weather. I wanna see this goddamn bear market over as much as anybody, which is why I'm trying to help make the next crash a double bottom and defend $270. To do that, i need fiat. That's why I'm shorting.



1761. Post 9742170 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on December 04, 2014, 09:41:38 PM


11 registered bidders - that sounds low... anyone know how many there were last time? Significantly more IIRC .. I think there were about 10 names on the leaked partial list

EDIT : Seems pretty clear nobody here knows if it is 1 bid can be for multiple blocks lol  Cheesy

27 bids for 20 blocks? less than 2 bids/block? After what happened at the last auction, I can't imagine they would be for anywhere close to market price.



1762. Post 9742360 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

yeah, I should a sold more.  The rocket is now digging. Maybe it's a drill.



1763. Post 9742569 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):


Quote from: jonoiv on December 04, 2014, 05:59:59 PM
about 1 hour to lift off.  Cool

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

liftoff for a bunker-buster missile, maybe.



1764. Post 9742659 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: jonoiv on December 04, 2014, 10:40:38 PM

about 1 hour to lift off.  Cool

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

liftoff for a bunker-buster missile, maybe.

Still sitting with your cap in hand and asking for a BTC hand out?  Still can't afford your electric? but shorting 50 BTC.   Cool

Yeah, I sold a pile at $425 so I have my light bill covered for a few months.



1765. Post 9742763 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: Hfertig on December 04, 2014, 10:50:52 PM
63 bids last time... 27 bids this time. Bearish. Very Bearish. But, in a speculative way. We really don't know much but you trade the rumor. Super bearish. And yes, I have a short. And no, I don't care about talking my book because the guys who really move the market aren't trolling around Bitcointalk's speculation forum.

Can't wait until this kid gets squeezed again. rofl

are you talking about a squeeze of 6200 btc on shorts or the 24 mio usd (up to 64800 btc)on longs in Bitfinex .

Hmmm. well, the early risers in China gotta be waking up soon with the price below 2300 and dropping. There's no way they'll panic tonight, right?



1766. Post 9743191 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on December 04, 2014, 11:39:41 PM
I am struggling to find anything sensible in this thread about anything. Does anyone here really think someone would buy the auctioned coins just to crash the bitcoin market? Do you really think these coins are going to be bought by the low ballers rather than the investors who wants to go long big? It's not even any FUD left here. It's like a sowing club. The only reason I see for any movement before monday is that adamstgBit is let out of his cage.

They wouldn't be trying to crash the market. They would be selling at a profit while there is still enough resistance to dump without much slippage. There's no point in owning bitcoin if you don't eventually sell them or trade them for something. if there are more than one winning bidders with this strategy, then there will be a race to see who can dump first.



1767. Post 9743271 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

China's waking up and the Panda Bear is taking a dump.



1768. Post 9743467 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

2280 breach on HooBoy. Bulls gettin' monkey-hammered. Let the panic, butthurt and recriminations commence! Makin' $$$$$$$$



1769. Post 9743569 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: Newbie1022 on December 05, 2014, 01:04:44 AM
I have no clue where we'll go from here :S

Probably down, but probably not far and probably not long. We're only down about 10 to 15 on the day... we are still trading in a pretty narrow range and the situation seems, at least for the moment, to be under control.

We'll see what the morning brings us.

We're down 2.74% in the last 24 hrs. That's money you could have saved and more coins you could buy if you saw the obvious dumps coming. At least I learn from my past mistakes. Some people never do.



1770. Post 9743660 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: Newbie1022 on December 05, 2014, 01:12:32 AM
I have no clue where we'll go from here :S

Probably down, but probably not far and probably not long. We're only down about 10 to 15 on the day... we are still trading in a pretty narrow range and the situation seems, at least for the moment, to be under control.

We'll see what the morning brings us.

We're down 2.74% in the last 24 hrs. That's money you could have saved and more coins you could buy if you saw the obvious dumps coming. At least I learn from my past mistakes. Some people never do.

Dude, I'm riding a short right now as well. This wasn't like the last auction where everybody was fired up and ready to go. No, this was a more sober bidding exercise. I don't think that they bid nightmarishly low or anything, but they had to know simply based on the number of bidders and the bids that the market would drop -- resultantly, they'd have no incentive to bid over market when they can go out on the market and get the cheaper the next day.

So, we have a little bit to drop. I still don't think the floor is going to fall out, though. There's too much resistance.

if it keeps slamming down, you're right, but I expect a little bit of a recovery and then more of a drift down through resistance as it dawns on the slow learners that we're not going to the moon any time soon.



1771. Post 9757722 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Thanks y'all for letting me almost double my short position with that little run up to $382. Pattern recognition is one of the components of intelligence, but some of you bastards can't even see the pattern after I point it out to you. If enough of you bastards don't short with me, then we won't have enough money to hold the ~$300 bottom and this damn bear market will drag out for another few months.

We have to hold the retest that's prolly coming. The next bubble will prolly take us to $4,000 or higher, so there will be plenty of time to jump on the train if we miss the first stop.

I'm a long term bull and hodler. My short is a hedge bet but if you fuckers get wiped out going margin long before the double bottom, I'll laugh my ass of while spending your money.

Hoping for some bull whale to save you is a poor investment strategy.



1772. Post 9767375 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Volume has gone to crap, but again we have done our job. We have eaten all the volatility for the time being.
Everyone is expecting the Sunday night bump (I am also), but what if we don't get much of one?

The problem with expecting something good is that there are no surprises to the upside. So are we getting this low volume melt up as a prelude to dumping like on Dec 2, or the first rumblings of a breakout? I'm net long but hedged short, so I don't really care. It will be interesting to watch.



1773. Post 9770066 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.37h):

Quote from: oda.krell on December 07, 2014, 05:31:39 PM
Volume has gone to crap, but again we have done our job. We have eaten all the volatility for the time being.
Everyone is expecting the Sunday night bump (I am also), but what if we don't get much of one?

The problem with expecting something good is that there are no surprises to the upside. So are we getting this low volume melt up as a prelude to dumping like on Dec 2, or the first rumblings of a breakout? I'm net long but hedged short, so I don't really care. It will be interesting to watch.

Yeah, that's not how it works, unless you balanced it out completely.

Care to give us a rough idea of the ratio of one to the other? That should determine sort of how much you care which way it breaks out.

My long is several times my short position, but that's in cold storage and I won't touch it for years if we don't get another bubble until then. If I'm wrong and we go up from here, there's plenty of time to cut my losses before I get a margin call. This loss of upward momentum indicates that it is likely to go down before it goes up much. I could be wrong, but I'm confident enough to bet about a year's salary on it. Even if we get a retest of the bottom, it may not hold. So far this is playing out more or less exactly how I expected. Time will tell.

I would caution anyone to not do something only because I am doing it. I have a excellent track record as an investor but I'm not very good at day trading. I've identified a pattern in the charts, but patterns repeat until they don't.



1774. Post 9772231 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

This really isn't much of a breakout so far. All moving averages are green or close to it. Order books look solidly bullish. I really expected the bulls to put up more of a fight, but maybe y'all are lying in wait, cuz you sure as hell aren't buying yet. Volume is low.

C'mon, bulls. Let's see what ya got. I got money in the bank, coins in cold storage and swap costs of $0.07. I can wait as long as you can. I can sell the whole way up and still have more than most of you. If you think there is enough demand to sustain a rally all the way to the next bubble, then why the hell aren't you buying? Running out of fiat? Yeah, I remember what that's like.

Just buy on faith. It worked for me four years ago. I'm ready for this bear market to end as much as anyone, so squeeze my short. I can afford it.



1775. Post 9772488 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

That's more like it. OK, now they are cheaper. Buy some more! Still green moving averages and bullish order books.

Are you bulls pussies or something? Gimme a fight. I'm bored counting my money.



1776. Post 9786396 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Ok, boys and girls, everybody have a good night? I'm 20 coins richer with the same amount of money. Of course I only bought those to dump on the heads of suckers if you think this bear market is really over before a REAL double bottom.

What needs to happen is a high volume slam into strong resistance @ $270-300. A low volume grind down and the bottom prolly won't hold. We hit expected resistance in the 340s which I'm proud to say I caught almost perfectly for once.

If (and I do mean IF) the bottom holds on HIGH volume, then it's balls to the wall in our rocket ship to Mars. Keep your powder dry, Boys. Don't fire 'til you see the whites of their eyes.



1777. Post 9787907 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on December 09, 2014, 02:28:31 PM
Hey billy well played sticking to your guns.

Thanks. I think $320 is a false bottom. Even if it is the bottom, it will be tested several times so there is no need to jump on the train the first time. Don't expect help from the BearWhale's millions above $300.

For those of you who say you're holding no matter what- why are you watching the charts? Do you enjoy pain? Let me spare you the suspense: It's prolly gonna creep up enough to give what-ever's left of the permabulls and the naive a false sense of security, and then we're gonna hammer you again.




1778. Post 9790842 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

It's not a tide, BitChick. It's a repeating pattern. Crash, bounce, pause, Spike, 2nd bounce higher up and then the long slow painful period of deterioration leading to the next crash. That's the period we are in now. There is a hell of a lot of money to be made on the way down if you recognize the pattern. That's money you can use to get you through until the next bull market or to buy more coins.

Wait a couple of days until it seems like the dumbest possible time to sell and then short the fuck out of this market. Then....wait and wait and wait. Don't cover until you get close to $320. Play the bounce if you want to but dump again because it's near $270 where the real battle will take place if there is one. If there isn't, then wait for the bounce, don't fall for the pause, short the spike cover on the second bounce and try to sell near the apex.

Each time the pattern repeats, it gets flatter, so with diminishing returns each time to whoever is doing this, eventually we can front run him or her (prolly bots) to the point where it's not profitable anymore. The trick will be so well known that the demand for coins to play along will end the bear market and...eventually moon.



1779. Post 9791462 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: mrkavasaki on December 09, 2014, 10:44:45 PM
damm i miss the old bitcoin days Embarrassed Undecided
where I could make $2k a day Roll Eyes

I made $2K in the last 24 HRS ;-)

To be fair, that includes the recovery from my upside down short, but I think it counts.



1780. Post 9791545 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: janos666 on December 09, 2014, 11:35:02 PM
You still gong for $500 by Dec 15th ??

Oh lol, I am going to the airport that day to pick up somebody who failed to start a new dream-life from scratch in a foreign country. Grin

To be fair, that includes the recovery from my upside down short, but I think it counts.

Similar here. But no, I don't think it counts.

ok ~ $1,100 then. I'll take it.



1781. Post 9793258 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: Omikifuse on December 10, 2014, 02:56:34 AM
We were supposed to be testing the 400's again, and now we are back to 350 Sad

Why is reality so stubborn?

Because some heavy hitter has perfected a brilliant four punch combination. It has nothing to do with fundamentals at all. It exploits the psychological phenomenon of loss aversion. People refuse to admit to themselves they made the wrong bet. The enormity of their mistake doesn't soak in until it's too late for them to cut their losses.

There is a way to counter this combination. Run in front of it. I'm either in cash or margin short until the double bottom or resistance BELOW $270.



1782. Post 9793411 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: lyth0s on December 10, 2014, 05:22:31 AM
We were supposed to be testing the 400's again, and now we are back to 350 Sad

Why is reality so stubborn?

Because some heavy hitter has perfected a brilliant four punch combination. It has nothing to do with fundamentals at all. It's

What four punch combination? and can you finish the sentence "its" heh

fixed. Sorry, phone call.



1783. Post 9797138 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: DaRude on December 10, 2014, 09:24:11 AM
Interesting, instead of trying to liquidate coins that BFX wall looks like it's just following Chinese rate. i.e. floats up when china goes up even if there's no volume/bids on BFX and vise versa.

Well, yeah. It does that at night when it's daytime in Shanghai. China leads then. The Europe (Bitsamp) takes a turn and finally (and this is the curve ball) Coinbase, which doesn't report volume. Then it starts over again the next day.



1784. Post 9799567 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Has anyone else noticed how much like surfing day trading is? You swim out during the lull, wait for your set, pick your wave and ride that bitch all the way to the beach. Rinse and repeat.

Woe until you who try to hold back the tide. It doesn't end well for you, but it's fun to watch the epic wipe-outs when you're not the one who gets wiped out.



1785. Post 9800430 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 10, 2014, 07:50:29 PM
We already have another looming 100k (or was it 90k?) auction on the horizon thanks to DPR's stupidity browsing his Silk Road admin panel in a public library and not encrypting his Bitcoin wallets. I don't want to consider another 100k Winklecoins.

But if the Winkles have any say in it, they will probably hold off until the price suits them better, and the general trend, because it will strongly influence the demand.

I have no evidence that the Winklevi are any good at market timing. It seems to me that any new big players will wait until current big holders or groups of holders dump before entering the market. Anyone who NEEDS Bitcoin to go up any time soon has to be feeling enormous stress that is building until it will burst.

This is a vicious game and if you are not tough or fast, you will get eaten.



1786. Post 9802947 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.38h):

Quote from: Unpredictable on December 11, 2014, 12:06:19 AM
Are we gonna test $316 again?

We're gonna retest $270. There was no volume on the $316 support.

This is sure a lot more fun if you know what you are doing!




1787. Post 9817683 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: BitAddict on December 12, 2014, 11:59:19 AM

I don't think restesting lower levels is going to happen really fast, it could take some months of slow bleeding until entering the final panic dumping with a flash crash.
Exactly as it started back in August, but slower and with smaller percentage down, as pump and dumps are slowing down.



I'm also concerned that soon after the PayPal announcement we had a huge crash.
All I know is that we've done our job achieving price stability for now. Now is the time to adjust buy/sell orders.  



1788. Post 9819322 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: bastilar on December 12, 2014, 01:48:03 PM
Well at least I know what my next paycheck will be spent on. It would be nice if btc goes up instead though.

So if it goes up, will you still buy? of course not. We know you think that way, so we won't let it go up by much. Prolly just up enough to draw in the suckers.

BTW, I really don't care if it goes up or down. I have a huge pile of coins in cold storage and if the bottom doesn't get retested, then I actually make much more than I lose on my short. We got the people who don't know what they're doing by the balls and all the time in the world to wait for you to screw up so we can take your money.



1789. Post 9861667 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

My guess is that there will be a move toward $300 and then it will pull away and many will think the danger is over, but then after a while when you aren't looking, the dumpers will try to smash through.

This is a huge opportunity for those who are patient. Swap costs are almost nothing right now so if you don't already have a short position,  wait for the pull back and then get one and wait because I guarantee, I know in my bones, The bottom will be retested.

As it gets closer to $270, start closing your short, just a few BTC at a time so nobody notices. If the retest happens relatively soon (say within a month or so), and volume is very high,  get out of your short and start going margin long.

With swap costs so low, there is a possibility of making a massive amount of money by putting relatively little of your own coins or cash at risk.

I have a massive short right now and my swap costs are less than a dollar a day. I'm gonna wait these fuckers out. Keep in mind we had both a short and long squeeze recently, so make sure your short liquidation price is over $475 and your long liquidation price is under $200 depending on your risk tolerance.

and for God's sake, get your coins off of the exchange and into cold storage or a vault if you are not going to put them in play.

This is an exciting time to be alive. Great fortunes will be won and lost in this battle. If $270 holds on high volume, I am going margin long and staying margin long until I can chop the head off of the next bubble.

Good luck and happy trading. and...try to make sure you have some balance in your life.  Some people risked and gave their lives to save the world. We are only risking money, most of it conjured out of thin air by banksters. Bitcoin isn't everything. If you can't afford to fight, that's ok. I bear a large part of the responsibility for things getting this bad, so I'm going to put a good size chunk into play.



1790. Post 9878166 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):

I said there would be a pullback from $300, but it's a waiting game. Wait until it's higher and you feel like the coast is clear and then put in your short,  but don't margin trade if you don't know what you are doing. The three surest ways for a smart man to go broke are liqueur, ladies, and leverage. Think big picture and long term.

All I can say is that if I survive this bear market, I am never EVER buying a Lamborghini. The world needs to know that Bitcoin is in the hands of competent managers of capital. They will not accept as money an asset that is so crazy volatile and who's decentral bankers are immature.

This storm will pass, and these parasites who took our money so easily will loose it just as easily when they don't expect to. They actually did me a favor by teaching me something I needed to learn and by making our project more accessible to new players.

I'm gonna take these bastards money and if I don't then I'm going to pay off the guy who does.  That's the beauty of the free market. Every trade is win-win or it doesn't happen.

 



1791. Post 9878729 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):

Quote from: creekbore on December 18, 2014, 02:04:58 PM

But seriously kids, don't take financial advice from a hick fireman who buys Bitcoin with a credit card -- however convincing he may sound.

That advice is actually from Warren Buffet.

I bought when they were from $6 to $10.  The hard part was holding onto them when when it crashed down to three bucks and stayed there for six months and then holding onto them through three more bubbles and crashes. I love my job as a fireman. I get payed to do what most people do for free. (most firefighters are volunteers).

I am no financial expert or genius, but I have options because I have a huge pile of coins and a massive short that I can pull the trigger on at any time. I'm just gonna wait you bastards out because I'll make money off of you either way. Bitcoin will either teach you patience or it will make you broke.

A person with balance in their life can be more objective. I am at peace with my decisions. The good ones made me money and the bad ones taught me something.



1792. Post 9884950 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):

Ah, stability. This is what I love to see. The near-perfect balance between greed and fear. With world financial markets in turmoil, Bitcoin is the port in the storm.

Go ahead, fear-mongers and try to tear down that $300 wall. I dare you. You will unleash a beast that is growing restless in his cage. I have never been short in four years of holding Bitcoin and I am just aching to close that position on your asses.

Your move, Gentlemen.



1793. Post 9885132 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):

Quote from: podyx on December 19, 2014, 04:43:03 AM
Ah, stability. This is what I love to see. The near-perfect balance between greed and fear. With world financial markets in turmoil, Bitcoin is the port in the storm.

Go ahead, fear-mongers and try to tear down that $300 wall. I dare you. You will unleash a beast that is growing restless in his cage. I have never been short in four years of holding Bitcoin and I am just aching to close that position on your asses.

Your move, Gentlemen.

Isn't it you who said you were short and had a good cold storage stash so it didn't matter if price went up or down?

Are you saying bitcoin will collapse if we go sub $300 or what?

Nope, not saying that at all. Bitcoin cannot collapse as long as there are two or more bidders. If bitcoin goes down to a fraction of a cent and I end up owning all of them and nobody wants to buy them, I consider that a win, like a poker player with all the chips at the end of the game. But that won't happen. Capital is fleeing Russia right now and all of the non-oligarchs have only one way to evade capital controls. Care to guess what that one way is? Every day the ruble sinks against the dollar, and Bitcoin stays more or less stable in dollar terms, bitcoin goes up in value relative to the Russian currency.

Cypress will be nothing compared to what's coming. That's why what I want most is stability right now. Crickets are my friends.





1794. Post 9890656 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):

I hope y'all understand how many coins we gave the jackals in this last four-punch raid. They've made the order book their bitch and so a low volume melt up and mild pump make me more concerned and not less that $270 will be retested. My short is staying put until we get a high volume test of support and no, that little slam into $302 wasn't it.

These assholes have taken our money by being patient and if we want to take Bitcoin back, we have to be even more patient than them.

If you are buying for the long term, then by all means buy now, this is a fantastic price. I'm talking to the decentral bankers, the liquidity suppliers. We are not even close to being out of danger. There will be no sustainable rise until stability is achieved first. This took half a year in 2009-10 and so I believe there will be plenty of time before the next bubble.



1795. Post 9890788 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.40h):

Quote from: tarmi on December 19, 2014, 05:41:22 PM

These assholes have taken our money



no stupid fuck you gave it all by yourself.

True enough, but I'm either going to get it back or pay off the guy who does. I can live with either outcome. You wanna pocket your winnings and walk away a winner or keep playing? I recouped my initial investment ages ago and I'm playing with house money. This is fun. So unless you got some other trick up your sleeve except the one you've pulled four times already, it's only a matter of time before I grind you down.

If you want a test of wills, you got it, pal.



1796. Post 9985656 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.42h):

Quote from: riiiiising on December 30, 2014, 05:36:41 PM

It's really incredible that we're still over $300 at this point. It's not going to last for long.


Network security is a mysterious, scary thing for most people (and if it doesn't concern you, then you're just being naive). The world isn't ready to entrust their fortunes to a peerless digital protocol. And you've got to wonder if they ever will be.

The world doesn't have to be ready to entrust their entire life savings, but if just 0.2% of the six and a half billion people on the planet want to own just one BTC each, there won't be enough to go around.



1797. Post 9985943 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.42h):

Quote from: nutschig on December 30, 2014, 06:11:32 PM

It's really incredible that we're still over $300 at this point. It's not going to last for long.


Network security is a mysterious, scary thing for most people (and if it doesn't concern you, then you're just being naive). The world isn't ready to entrust their fortunes to a peerless digital protocol. And you've got to wonder if they ever will be.

The world doesn't have to be ready to entrust their entire life savings, but if just 0.2% of the six and a half billion people on the planet want to own just one BTC each, there won't be enough to go around.

7 billion people, unless you have a eugenic set of ethics.

I'm using a conservative estimate. My point remains and is even strengthened if there are seven billion.



1798. Post 9986219 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.42h):

Quote from: aminorex on December 30, 2014, 06:35:32 PM
So, if you are a hodler, you might want to promote Catholicism.  No contraception, but easy absolution for vice.  Lots of SR^N customers.

The problem with being a hodler, my friend, is that we have a responsibility to reduce volatility. We day traders are the decentral bankers of this new system. If we don't sell enough at the tops, we can't have enough fiat to scoop up the cheap coins during the crashes. The beauty of Bitcoin is that we have an incentive to do what we ought to be doing anyway, unlike central bankers.

Central bankers throughout the world are gearing up for another round of money printing. It has already started in Japan. To men with only a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. To men with only a printing press, every solvency issue looks like a liquidity issue.




1799. Post 9986432 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.42h):

Quote from: Silverspoon on December 30, 2014, 06:57:16 PM

Central bankers throughout the world are gearing up for another round of money printing.

Bitcoin's has been doing nothing but printing money since the day it was born.  glass houses and stones and all...

At a predetermined and predictable rate. That is something that can be priced in. OTOH Central Banker counterfeiting (oh, excuse me, "quantitative easing") occurs whenever our energy costs and interest rates get too low to sufficiently enrich the oligarchs who control the fiat banking system.

If just 0.4% of the world population will want to own one BTC each, there will NEVER be enough to go around. We are the One Percenters of the new millennium, but so far we have done a worse job of managing our resources than the old oligarchs. We must get this volatility under control.



1800. Post 9988712 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.42h):

I think it likely that we're going down or sideways for a while, which is ok by me. Sideways means stability and down means I can cover my short.

I don't much care if price goes down or up. I care if it goes down or up too fast. As long as BTC sinks slower than the Ruble or some other shitty national currencies, we're doing fine. As a way to evade capital controls, BTC will just need to be the leper with the most toes in order to turn this around.



1801. Post 10020315 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.42h):

The problem with waiting for final capitulation is that that if BTC price sinks slow enough in USD, it may actually gain value in enough other currencies to serve as an inflation hedge in those currencies so the final capitulation may not happen. Actually that would mean it already happened @ $270 just before the Bear Whale dumped.

The guy lost what? over three million $ by selling @ $300/BTC.  Who would be stupid enough to do that now after what happened to him?  I got a short in, but if you don't already have one as you should have, it's too fucking late to get one now. You should have gotten in on the pullback to $338 ofter the bounce off of $302 that I told you was coming. Ride it out.

All the people who were laughing at that guy are telling you to sell now. The took his coins and now they want yours. Can you hold? How long? If the answer isn't "as long as it takes", then you might as well give me your coins now. You don't deserve them.



1802. Post 10055473 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Thanks to that incompetent Slovenian shit, we blew through a multi-year support level. BFX just became the de facto world exchange. That is terrible news, not because I don't like BFX, but because now it is the central point of failure that makes the whole damn system vulnerable.

It bears repeating: IF YOU AREN'T GOING TO PUT YOUR COINS INTO PLAY, GET THEM OFF OF THE DAMN EXCHANGE. IF YOU DON'T PERSONALLY HOLD THE PRIVATE KEYS, YOU DON'T OWN ANY BITCOIN. You hold BTC IOUs from a third party.


My analysis: We are prolly going down, but not by much unless we get some cascading margin calls from leveraged longs. If that happens there will be crash, a bounce, a pause and then a SHORT squeeze, so all you have to do is not get force liquidated and you'll make bank.

If you now find yourself in a leveraged long position, I strongly recommend you post additional margin to prevent a forced liquidation or cut your losses now.  The four punch raiders will try to drive us down to <$200 but I don't think they'll make it. They might though, so be prepared.




1803. Post 10055662 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Re: naked shorts on Stamp

If the 19K coins never existed, then why the 19k BTC move on the block chain? Is this a true Goxxing where lost coins are blamed on a hack that didn't really happen or that happened ages ago?   

Naked short-selling could help explain this prolonged bear market, but every short (naked or otherwise) must be covered at some point. 




1804. Post 10060784 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Quote from: kryptopojken on January 06, 2015, 06:10:57 PM
There's a bot at bfx selling between 0.4 and 0.8 every few seconds. Maybe it's shorting actually, not sure

um no, there is a bot putting in very small bids piling on top of each other. This is why the price is going UP with red candles. Smart buyers with limit orders and dumb sellers with market orders. You pay less for limit trades and you also get to buy more with less slippage.

I wouldn't read too much into this one way or another. The volume is so low it could mean anything or nothing.



1805. Post 10064839 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

I'm still expecting a plunge to as low as $220, but I'm buying anyway. These prices are just too low to pass up. I just don't think there was enough volume in the bounce off of $255 for it to be a final bottom. Worst case scenario is cascading margin calls that drop us to $200. Unlikely but possible. Ironically Stamp's suspended operations has given me and I suspect others time to pad our margins.  It also halted some panicked people.

A successful retest of $255 where it holds on even higher volume means a very likely end of the bear market, but it's way too soon to call it. Best case scenario is that Coinbase went down due to overwhelming buying. I doubt that's really the case but it's possible. If people really were naked short-selling, then there will be (and possibly is) a scramble to find coins in order to cover.

The least likely scenario is we go straight up from here. If that happens, a lot of short positions will be force liquidated causing a massive spike with a major retracement. If that happens, go margin short as close to the top as you can and then cover on the retracement.



1806. Post 10066123 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Of course! Why didn't I think of this before? Coinbase was using Stamp for liquidity! That meant that if they ran out of coins, they would buy from Bitstamp. They went down because they ran out of coins and had nobody to buy from!

CB is back up now which means they either got coins from selling customers, pulled some of their reserves from cold storage,  or they found a different exchange (BFX or Kracken) from which to buy.




1807. Post 10066297 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

I don't have an account at Bitsamp so someone who knows more about it can correct me, but as I understand it, there isn't direct short-selling there. You have to borrow coins from other account holders and sell them, then presumably buy back on the exchange to cover your short.

If this is the case, then what if someone compromised Stamp a long time ago to not only sell non-existent coins but also to lend them out at interest? That could explain low swap costs (real coin lenders have to compete with fake coin lenders driving swap costs down). More importantly it could explain the prolonged bear market.

With naked short-selling, an unethical billionaire or group of rich people could drive the BTC price down for a prolonged period of time in order to acquire equity in the Bitcoin ecosytem at a steep discount. I'm pretty sure the FBI would consider this criminal behavior if it turns out they auctioned off their confiscated coins for a fraction of their true worth.

This is speculation, but it seems like an extremely convenient time for Stamp to get hacked just as they had an unusually large amount of coins in their hot wallet. That is further circumstantial evidence of a previously compromised security system. 

Or it could be an inside job. I don't know the operators, but when I think of Slovenians, the term "rock-solid highly ethical financial management" does not come to mind.



1808. Post 10066444 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Quote from: freebit13 on January 07, 2015, 06:09:31 AM

this points to more than just a wallet hack, whoever swept those coins into that wallet before clearing it must have had access to more than just the wallet.dat file...

I agree, but it could be that the coins weren't swept and the thief had to wait for an unusually large amount of coins to be in the hot wallet, but how would he know that would ever happen or that their wouldn't be an even better time to make his move?

What puzzles me is that the crash apparently started BEFORE the theft. Did someone know what was about to happen and trade on inside information? Did the Stamp operators discover the theft and start trading the predictable plunge before disclosing it? Or maybe nothing nefarious happened (other than the theft) and crashes are just a normal part of a bear market. I dunno.

Whatever happened, it worked out for me personally as I had a short position and a bunch of lowball bids in ahead of time. I consider lowball bids with a low probability of ever getting filled sort of like lottery tickets. It makes sense to have a small part of one's portfolio dedicated to bottom feeding.



1809. Post 10066456 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Quote from: Hlavax on January 07, 2015, 06:27:07 AM


what do you mean by "non-existent coins"?

I mean coins that were not ever mined but only existed as credits into an account at Bitstamp.



1810. Post 10066676 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Quote from: F-bernanke on January 07, 2015, 06:50:49 AM


what do you mean by "non-existent coins"?

I mean coins that were not ever mined but only existed as credits into an account at Bitstamp.

Like gox coins. I don't understand how everybody thinks gox pumped the price, when instead they were selling non existent coins en masse, Logic says this keeps the price down, because they were flooding the market with coins that were not there (naked short selling).

Gox coins did not pump the price. Mark Krapeles pumped the price only when his dishonest attempt to hide his lost coins resulted in him buying coins (via willy bot) to continue the ruse that he still had them and that MtGox was still solvent. This only drove up the price on Gox which is why there was the large price disparity between Gox and other exchanges. Why that guy isn't in jail yet is a mystery to me.

Incidentally, I got my coins out of Gox when the price disparity became suspiciously large. Just in time as it turns out. It's generally a good idea to play it safe whenever you smell funky kicks going down in the city.



1811. Post 10066904 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 07, 2015, 07:43:14 AM


Do you know what happened to that guy that sold real bitcoins for goxcoins towards the end?

from what I heard, the operator of the exchange ("Bitcoinbuilder" I think)traded all or most of his profits for gox coins and got wiped out when Gox took the big dirt nap.



1812. Post 10067072 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 07, 2015, 07:55:39 AM


Do you know what happened to that guy that sold real bitcoins for goxcoins towards the end?

from what I heard, the operator of the exchange ("Bitcoinbuilder" I think)traded all or most of his profits for gox coins and got wiped out when Gox took the big dirt nap.

That was the dumbest business idea ever! I know hindsight is 20/20, but we could all smell the stench of death by then.

It would have been brilliant if he had taken his profits in real BTC and also traded away his own stash of goxcoins. He helped a lot of people cut their losses.



1813. Post 10085633 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 08, 2015, 10:40:25 PM
shorts are vulnerable, trapped, scared, exchange closed, positons underwater ... watching the price rise right now must be sickening.

The sharks are circling and they can smell blood, mother of all short squeezes probably gonna send the Swamp under .... if it ever comes up again.

What makes it interesting is that swap fees skyrocketed (almost immediately after I closed my short-w00t!).
The bears were making almost free money borrowing BTC at such low rates, but now it will cost them to wait for the next crash.  I'm certainly not calling a bottom, but I think we're close.



1814. Post 10086000 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

This is not my first multi-year bear market. I just got a second job and not only will I not be selling anymore coins, but I will be adding to my position until either after the next ATH or if it never comes, after I retire.

I don't care if it tanks to $10 dollars again. That just gives me the opportunity to buy a whole lot more. How do you hunt bears? Patiently.



1815. Post 10086122 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

Quote from: podyx on January 08, 2015, 11:34:37 PM
This is not my first multi-year bear market. I just got a second job and not only will I not be selling anymore coins, but I will be adding to my position until either after the next ATH or if it never comes, after I retire.

I don't care if it tanks to $10 dollars again. That just gives me the opportunity to buy a whole lot more. How do you hunt bears? Patiently.

Don't you think another coin would take bitcoin's place if it were to go down to $10 though? I mean, sure, bitcoin is the crypto-currency which gets mentioned all the time and it was the first one but when we come down to those low levels, I think it'll be the sharp money which decides which one will grow big and they will probably choose a better one.

That's roughly akin to saying oil replaced coal when the industrial revolution switched from steam to internal combustion, so coal is now worthless.  I think it likely that BTC will remain a good investment even if something else proves to be an even better investment.



1816. Post 10086179 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

Quote from: Jammalan the Prophet on January 08, 2015, 11:35:39 PM
This is not my first multi-year bear market. I just got a second job and not only will I not be selling anymore coins, but I will be adding to my position until either after the next ATH or if it never comes, after I retire.

I don't care if it tanks to $10 dollars again. That just gives me the opportunity to buy a whole lot more. How do you hunt bears? Patiently.

I wonder what will happen when all the coins will end up in the hands of 100-200 people. Wink


I'll try to take them from one of them so their will only be 99 of us. There's prolly only a handful of people who own most of the world's precious art but that doesn't make it worthless. This is history and owning a piece of the world's first cryptocurrency could become a valuable collector's item even if it never becomes a reserve currency. I've bought $100,000,000,000 notes from Zimbabwe. I'd like to own a confederate dollar. I would pay double for one of Laslo's Pizza coins, to name a few examples.



1817. Post 10086928 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

Quote from: Specular on January 09, 2015, 12:58:55 AM
Oh my, these posts are going to be so funny to read when Bitcoin is $100k. People arguing over 10's of dollars lol !!!!

In a few years $10 will be worth nothing assuming the dollar fails to be the world reserve currency and people lose faith in it.

Fiat paper is simply....toilet paper with ink on it.

I believe that a lot of Fiat currencies are in for trouble in 2015 - Russia, The Euro, Turkey, Argentina, Russia's satellite states (such as Belarus) and even some Asian currencies mixed up in the devaluation currency war between China and Japan.

But of all the currencies out there, I think the USD has the biggest chance of thriving. The US has the biggest economy, it has the most advanced military, it has the rule of law, it has a crap ton of food/resources and it has a strong, dynamic and growing economy.

Think about this - where would you want to keep a couple million dollars for 5 years? In China it can get confiscated, Japan is a QE freakshow with a declining population, in Russia your fate is tied to Putin and Oil, the Eurozone is about to go through some serious shit with Greece again, and most other places (except for the tiny nation of Switzerland) are a complete gamble. I don't get all these "US dollar will be worthless" people. The USD is the safe place to keep big pools of $ long term - bearing any major unexpected political or social black swan that knocks America down a peg or two.

The people who need BTC aren't Americans, its those poor bastards buying toasters and flatscreens to try to save their quickly depreciating savings.

Just my 2 cents.

Speaking of Russians, the $255 bottom was actually a true double bottom in Rubles (higher low on higher volume). Russia has the potential to be the next Cypress on steroids.



1818. Post 10087004 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

Quote from: heartastack on January 09, 2015, 01:27:39 AM
Oh my, these posts are going to be so funny to read when Bitcoin is $100k. People arguing over 10's of dollars lol !!!!

In a few years $10 will be worth nothing assuming the dollar fails to be the world reserve currency and people lose faith in it.

Fiat paper is simply....toilet paper with ink on it.

I believe that a lot of Fiat currencies are in for trouble in 2015 - Russia, The Euro, Turkey, Argentina, Russia's satellite states (such as Belarus) and even some Asian currencies mixed up in the devaluation currency war between China and Japan.

But of all the currencies out there, I think the USD has the biggest chance of thriving. The US has the biggest economy, it has the most advanced military, it has the rule of law, it has a crap ton of food/resources and it has a strong, dynamic and growing economy.

Think about this - where would you want to keep a couple million dollars for 5 years? In China it can get confiscated, Japan is a QE freakshow with a declining population, in Russia your fate is tied to Putin and Oil, the Eurozone is about to go through some serious shit with Greece again, and most other places (except for the tiny nation of Switzerland) are a complete gamble. I don't get all these "US dollar will be worthless" people. The USD is the safe place to keep big pools of $ long term - bearing any major unexpected political or social black swan that knocks America down a peg or two.

The people who need BTC aren't Americans, its those poor bastards buying toasters and flatscreens to try to save their quickly depreciating savings.

Just my 2 cents.

The fed will keep bailing banks and keep interest rats low with citizen dollars. Let's see how long...

Until a bond market revolt. Then it's either a deflationary depression that will make the 1930s look like the good ol' days or (more likely) a hyper-inflationary mega recession that ends with a failed currency. One of these two things has to happen eventually (barring the discovery of cold fusion or some other miracle tech), and it's impossible to hedge against them both. It's death by fire or ice. International trade will have to be done very creatively if at all.



1819. Post 10099417 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

PATTERN BETTING

I dunno who the heavy hitter(s) is/are, but they've become very predictable.


If the Four Punch raiders are still in control of this market (I think they prolly are), we're going to see a long squeeze before the next short squeeze. Even if you are margin long, make it an ass-load of margin. With cascading margin calls and forced liquidations (such as at $400, $340, and $275), I would make sure your long liquidation price is at least as low as $200 and prolly a little more just in case. Remember, all you have to do is survive the long squeeze, go full-on stupid margin long after the bottom, ignore or slightly trade the pause and then wait for the short squeeze to close your long, go margin short, don't fall for the second bounce, ride the next crash and then cover at a price slightly higher than the previous low (I'm guessing ~$222), withdraw10 percent of your profits to pay for hookers and blow, put in a bunch of bottom-feeding limit orders under that, rinse and repeat.

These guys could easily be doubling up every time the pattern repeats and it has repeated four times so far.  That means they have ~16 times as much market clout as they did when the first crashed the market.  

PATTERN:
CRASH (long squeeze)
BOUNCE
PAUSE (fake rally then fake crash)
SPIKE (short-squeeze)
SECOND BOUNCE
Complete dissipation of all upward momentum.





1820. Post 10119467 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 10, 2015, 04:11:51 AM
PATTERN BETTING

I dunno who the heavy hitter(s) is/are, but they've become very predictable.


If the Four Punch Raiders are still in control of this market (I think they prolly are), we're going to see a long squeeze before the next short squeeze. Even if you are margin long, make it an ass-load of margin. With cascading margin calls and forced liquidations (such as at $400, $340, and $275), I would make sure your long liquidation price is at least as low as $200 and prolly a little more just in case. Remember, all you have to do is survive the long squeeze, go full-on stupid margin long after the bottom, ignore or slightly trade the pause and then wait for the short squeeze to close your long, go margin short, don't fall for the second bounce, ride the next crash and then cover at a price slightly higher than the previous low (I'm guessing ~$222), withdraw10 percent of your profits to pay for hookers and blow, put in a bunch of bottom-feeding limit orders under that, rinse and repeat.

These guys could easily be doubling up every time the pattern repeats and it has repeated four times so far.  That means they have ~16 times as much market clout as they did when they first crashed the market.  

PATTERN:
CRASH (long squeeze)
BOUNCE
PAUSE (fake rally then fake crash)
SPIKE (short-squeeze)
SECOND BOUNCE
Complete dissipation of all upward momentum.


We are in the crash phase.







1821. Post 10119719 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: JamesBrown on January 12, 2015, 12:37:36 AM
PATTERN BETTING

I dunno who the heavy hitter(s) is/are, but they've become very predictable.


If the Four Punch raiders are still in control of this market (I think they prolly are), we're going to see a long squeeze before the next short squeeze. Even if you are margin long, make it an ass-load of margin. With cascading margin calls and forced liquidations (such as at $400, $340, and $275), I would make sure your long liquidation price is at least as low as $200 and prolly a little more just in case. Remember, all you have to do is survive the long squeeze, go full-on stupid margin long after the bottom, ignore or slightly trade the pause and then wait for the short squeeze to close your long, go margin short, don't fall for the second bounce, ride the next crash and then cover at a price slightly higher than the previous low (I'm guessing ~$222), withdraw10 percent of your profits to pay for hookers and blow, put in a bunch of bottom-feeding limit orders under that, rinse and repeat.

These guys could easily be doubling up every time the pattern repeats and it has repeated four times so far.  That means they have ~16 times as much market clout as they did when they first crashed the market.  

PATTERN:
CRASH (long squeeze)
BOUNCE
PAUSE (fake rally then fake crash)
SPIKE (short-squeeze)
SECOND BOUNCE
Complete dissipation of all upward momentum.


We are in the crash phase.
Who are the Four Punch raiders and how do I go margin long under present conditions?

You shouldn't be margin long right now. I mean IF you are stuck margin long, post a shit-ton of extra margin to keep from being force liquidated, because a lot of people are going to get wiped out soon. If you can't do that, cut your losses by selling enough now to keep the margin call of your leveraged long position UNDER $200.

There will be an extremely high volume crash to ~ $200-$222 followed by a bounce into the high $200s, a side step lower and then a short squeeze. Don't go margin long until AFTER the bottom on the way back up.





1822. Post 10119824 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on January 12, 2015, 12:52:15 AM


I think we're in a "fake crash phase"... Someone is slowly closing his shorts.

There is ~ a 20% chance that $355 will hold on a retest. I hope it does, bit I am not optimistic. I would be closing margin short positions now myself, but I already did that.  Volume tells the story and in my opinion there wasn't nearly enough volume off of the $255 bounce for that to be a true bottom. It will almost certainly be retested and likely won't hold.

I think we have maybe a week until the big crash. Could be sooner, could be longer, could be never, but a good boy scout is always prepared.



1823. Post 10119885 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: JamesBrown on January 12, 2015, 12:58:46 AM



So no 200$ Bottom prediction, just this pattern to no end?

The pattern repeats, but it gets flatter each time. It is my hope that by exposing it, there will be so much demand for coins to front-run the pattern that we can stop it, but eventually it has to stop anyway as diminishing returns will have to yield to fundamentals at some point.

We can beat them by joining them and then defecting from the cartel at the most opportune time. This will be on the retest of whatever the new low will be in the low low $200s (AFTER the next cycle).  An extremely rich person can do it now on the retest of $255 support, but I don't have anywhere close to enough clout to even attempt it myself.



1824. Post 10133957 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

Holy God, I take a little time off to watch a football game and the world falls apart. Can't say it was unexpected. I'm a buyer @ $222



1825. Post 10150819 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

The one silver lining to this disaster is the the USG ain't gonna get shit for their silk road coins.



1826. Post 10150922 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 14, 2015, 01:06:11 PM
Blood in the streets.
Is anybody going to buy?
I'm a lot of $ down but would anybody recommend buying now?

I've been looking at these chart patterns for years and this is not a trend reversal pattern. It may go up a little but then another wave of selling will bring it back.

Of course the opposite strategy may work: nobody (myself included) thinks this is a good time to buy, which is why it may be.



1827. Post 10156310 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

I'm starting to think the Four Punch Raiders may have lost control of this market. They need to remember the Hustler's Axiom:

You can sheer a sheep many times, but you can skin him only once.

I ain't buyin' another goddam coin to assist in the short squeeze but I'll short like hell after the pop. BUT this time there may not be a short squeeze. I think there is a real possibility that there will be another drop and the FPRs will get long squeezed themselves.



1828. Post 10156598 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: podyx on January 14, 2015, 09:09:02 PM
I'm starting to think the Four Punch Raiders may have lost control of this market. They need to remember the Hustler's Axiom:

You can sheer a sheep many times, but you can skin him only once.

I ain't buyin' another goddam coin to assist in the short squeeze but I'll short like hell after the pop. BUT this time there may not be a short squeeze. I think there is a real possibility that there will be another drop and the FPRs will get long squeezed themselves.

I thought you were buying even if it fell to $10?

I'm long now, but I'm not buying more until the four punch raids stop. This last one was too big. For now I am content with my stash and making money front-running these assholes. To be honest, I simply can't afford to put any additional money at risk.



1829. Post 10156834 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: BTCtrader71 on January 14, 2015, 09:41:36 PM
I'm starting to think the Four Punch Raiders may have lost control of this market. They need to remember the Hustler's Axiom:

You can sheer a sheep many times, but you can skin him only once.

I ain't buyin' another goddam coin to assist in the short squeeze but I'll short like hell after the pop. BUT this time there may not be a short squeeze. I think there is a real possibility that there will be another drop and the FPRs will get long squeezed themselves.

I thought you were buying even if it fell to $10?

I'm long now, but I'm not buying more until the four punch raids stop. This last one was too big. For now I am content with my stash and making money front-running these assholes. To be honest, I simply can't afford to put any additional money at risk.

How many btc do you think it would take to execute one of these four punch raids?

I think relatively few considering the total BTC market cap. It has always been easier to destroy than to create, and with shorting possible, the incentive is there as well. I don't think these are government people or banksters. They are simple profiteers. They combine viral campaigns, trolling and possibly insider information and stolen coins to effectively amplify their impact. It's quite impressive really from a purely amoral strategic point of view.

The short answer: only a few hundred thousand coins.



1830. Post 10157066 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: BTCtrader71 on January 14, 2015, 10:00:37 PM
I'm starting to think the Four Punch Raiders may have lost control of this market. They need to remember the Hustler's Axiom:

You can sheer a sheep many times, but you can skin him only once.

I ain't buyin' another goddam coin to assist in the short squeeze but I'll short like hell after the pop. BUT this time there may not be a short squeeze. I think there is a real possibility that there will be another drop and the FPRs will get long squeezed themselves.

I thought you were buying even if it fell to $10?

I'm long now, but I'm not buying more until the four punch raids stop. This last one was too big. For now I am content with my stash and making money front-running these assholes. To be honest, I simply can't afford to put any additional money at risk.

How many btc do you think it would take to execute one of these four punch raids?

I think relatively few considering the total BTC market cap. It has always been easier to destroy than to create, and with shorting possible, the incentive is there as well. I don't think these are government people or banksters. They are simple profiteers. They combine viral campaigns, trolling and possibly insider information and stolen coins to effectively amplify their impact. It's quite impressive really from a purely amoral strategic point of view.

The short answer: only a few hundred thousand coins.

a few hundred thousand -- that's quite a few coins I think. Unless you mean a few hundred thousand on leverage, which would only require an order of magnitude less in starting capital.

They prolly started with much less, but have easily doubled up or more during every raid making them ~16X more powerful than when they started- 32X if you count this last one. These are technically skilled traders to begin with who would be profitable traders even if they weren't market movers and market makers. When you have skill to begin with, it takes much less ammo to push the market in the direction it wants to go anyway. Even I could walk it up and walk it back on a slow day with very low volume and--as has been pointed out several times--am just a hick fireman.



1831. Post 10157295 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: BTCtrader71 on January 14, 2015, 10:17:22 PM

They prolly started with much less, but have easily doubled up or more during every raid making them ~16X more powerful than when they started- 32X if you count this last one. These are technically skilled traders to begin with who would be profitable traders even if they weren't market movers and market makers. When you have skill to begin with, it takes much less ammo to push the market in the direction it wants to go anyway. Even I could walk it up and walk it back on a slow day with very low volume and--as has been pointed out several times--am just a hick fireman.

Surely they don't risk all of their capital every time. One miscalculation or piece of bad luck and you get wiped out.

They don't have to risk all of it because they are so powerful, they only risk what they need to risk. They were going to push the market down until there was a long squeeze. I have no idea how much of their capital it took but surely not all of it. The problem is there has been no real bounce yet like the other four raids. This is new. They may have been too successful in accumulating coins and now they have (like me ironically) too many coins that aren't worth anything. Yes, we can leverage them up to push the market higher, but not sustainably without a fresh infusion of fiat.

This may be an unrecoverable stall without Big Money coming to the rescue and who knows how long we're going to bleed before the vultures come in and pick over our carcasses. I am not selling, but I have to prepare for an indefinite period without additional income.



1832. Post 10157787 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: samsonn25 on January 14, 2015, 11:13:49 PM

Me too.

From $48 is like 97% drop

at least you'll be able to mine it again on a CPU- not profitably, but still...



1833. Post 10158074 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

In Economics 101, we learn that MV=PQ meaning the money supply times the velocity equals the price of goods times the quantity. Supply is increasing at a decelerating rate, velocity is increasing, The quantity of goods is increasing geometrically, so a fundamental analysis would indicate that prices of goods in BTC terms should also be increasing, which is what we see. Everything is going up, but not at the same rate.

Even if there was no new coins coming to market, an increased velocity (BTC changing hands) effectively produces the same result. We have become victims of our own success. The more bitcoins are actually used, the greater the effective money supply. The best way to turn this around is by dramatically increasing the things that can be purchased with bitcoin (Q) without the need to convert to fiat before or afterward.

To do that we need to decrease the volatility, regardless of the price. We need a financial instrument similar to the VIX so that long term holders can concurrently profit from stability as well as rising prices. Otherwise we have to trade constantly to reduce volatility. Only then would it even be possible to have BTC be a reliable store of value and it would take BIG MONEY to make it happen.





1834. Post 10158520 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Something is really screwy on BFX. I tried to put in limit sells order over $300 and it executed them immediately as market sells!  I immediately closed the positions at a small loss, but there is no way I'm risking this shit. My coins are coming home.



1835. Post 10158580 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on January 15, 2015, 12:36:38 AM
Something is really screwy on BFX. I tried to put in limit sells order over $300 and it executed them immediately as market sells!  I immediately closed the positions at a small loss, but there is no way I'm risking this shit. My coins are coming home.

Unless there is reason to believe otherwise, it was probably a typo.

was not. I tried it several times with differing amounts and differing prices. On the outside chance that BFX was hacked and this isn't a glitch, this could be the worst timing something like this could happen.



1836. Post 10158777 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on January 15, 2015, 12:39:29 AM
Something is really screwy on BFX. I tried to put in limit sells order over $300 and it executed them immediately as market sells!  I immediately closed the positions at a small loss, but there is no way I'm risking this shit. My coins are coming home.

Unless there is reason to believe otherwise, it was probably a typo.

was not. I tried it several times with differing amounts and differing prices.
Well then, that is extremely "bad". I doubt it has much to do with the downtrend, though.

Is anyone else having this problem?

edit: apparently fixed



1837. Post 10159039 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Quote from: colour on January 15, 2015, 01:09:31 AM
How do you spot a launchpad pattern?

It's easy if you are as experienced with TA as I am. Just trust me and get ready for liftoff.  Smiley

Buy now or cry into your pillow later!

197 on Finex already! OMFG!!!

$202!! the shorts are gonna get it in the shorts



1838. Post 10159556 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

THIS IS ALL MANIPULATION from the Four Punch Raiders


C'mon- all these posts from new accounts like who in the hell would be just now getting into BTC? This is all part of the FPR's plan. It's gonna shoot up to maybe $240, then crash back down to under $200 before the real short squeeze reversal up to even $350.

I'm thinking of even playing the pause selling at over $240 and then buying back in below $200.

the problem is that after the short squeeze and the second bounce, it will again go into free fall. I guess that's good because I will have made so much $$$ that I can load up, but damn, this is not good for Bitcoin.



1839. Post 10159625 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Quote from: outahere on January 15, 2015, 02:57:23 AM
Who are the "Four Punch Raiders?"

The guys who scooped up all the coins at the bottom because they caused the crash. The guys who have been doing this four times and now the fifth time since the bear market began. Heavy hitters with a four punch combination

Crash/bounce
Stutter step
Spike
Second Bounce





1840. Post 10160230 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Quote from: lyth0s on January 15, 2015, 04:03:57 AM
THIS IS ALL MANIPULATION from the Four Punch Raiders


C'mon- all these posts from new accounts like who in the hell would be just now getting into BTC? This is all part of the FPR's plan. It's gonna shoot up to maybe $240, then crash back down to under $200 before the real short squeeze reversal up to even $350.

I'm thinking of even playing the pause selling at over $240 and then buying back in below $200.

the problem is that after the short squeeze and the second bounce, it will again go into free fall. I guess that's good because I will have made so much $$$ that I can load up, but damn, this is not good for Bitcoin.

I have to agree with you.  "Oh poor little me, I don't even know what a bull trap is, please explain. And what is CCMF?"  Yeah, of course you're just getting into bitcoin and you just read the white paper. Not fooling anyone.

This thread is weird beyond weird sometimes.

My trading coins have seen a 940% return in the past 3 days. Billyjoealien is the man! I was going to tip him a few 100 bucks in bitcoin, but then he didn't respond to my PM's asking for more advice....it doesn't pay to be rude Tongue

I have a job. I was at work. Besides, I don't believe you. You said you leveraged up 30:1 and that's not really an option. But if it is true, I'm glad I could be of service. Consider it a gift. gratis.



1841. Post 10160313 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Quote from: aztecminer on January 15, 2015, 04:41:37 AM
So which one of you tools sold at the bottom?

wasn't me. i didnt do it.

It's too early to say that WAS the bottom. I think it prolly was, at least until the next cycle, so I leveraged up a whopping 2.4% with a liquidation price of $5 bucks just for shits and giggles. I'm just not that enthusiastic about this round. I think maybe the FPRs might have killed their golden goose.

EDIT: Either that or they're waiting for another bear whale before they really start the next pump.




1842. Post 10160545 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Quote from: pjviitas on January 15, 2015, 05:06:08 AM
So which one of you tools sold at the bottom?

wasn't me. i didnt do it.

It's too early to say that WAS the bottom. I think it prolly was, at least until the next cycle, so I leveraged up a whopping 2.4% with a liquidation price of $5 bucks just for shits and giggles. I'm just not that enthusiastic about this round. I think maybe the FPRs might have killed their golden goose.

EDIT: Either that or they're waiting for another bear whale before they really start the next pump.



The 1w charts have to at least start looking up before I jump back in...I may not catch the very bottom but it will be close enough.

Those charts are almost completely worthless and getting progressively more so. Back date them and you will see that they are not reliable indicators. What is critical to recognize is the four step pattern. This is not an organic market or even close to it.

The bear market will not end until the FPRs either lose control or change strategies. So far their is little evidence that either event has occurred.



1843. Post 10165639 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Quote from: BTCtrader71 on January 15, 2015, 06:18:05 AM

They prolly started with much less, but have easily doubled up or more during every raid making them ~16X more powerful than when they started- 32X if you count this last one. These are technically skilled traders to begin with who would be profitable traders even if they weren't market movers and market makers. When you have skill to begin with, it takes much less ammo to push the market in the direction it wants to go anyway. Even I could walk it up and walk it back on a slow day with very low volume and--as has been pointed out several times--am just a hick fireman.

Surely they don't risk all of their capital every time. One miscalculation or piece of bad luck and you get wiped out.

They don't have to risk all of it because they are so powerful, they only risk what they need to risk. They were going to push the market down until there was a long squeeze. I have no idea how much of their capital it took but surely not all of it. The problem is there has been no real bounce yet like the other four raids. This is new. They may have been too successful in accumulating coins and now they have (like me ironically) too many coins that aren't worth anything. Yes, we can leverage them up to push the market higher, but not sustainably without a fresh infusion of fiat.

This may be an unrecoverable stall without Big Money coming to the rescue and who knows how long we're going to bleed before the vultures come in and pick over our carcasses. I am not selling, but I have to prepare for an indefinite period without additional income.

If these traders really know what they're doing, they probably have a stash of USD in reserve just in case the bounce needs a little help, wouldn't you think? A simple bump to $240 right about now would go a long way towards keeping hope (and by hope I mean their sheep) alive.

Absolutely. I'm slightly margin long until $240, then I'm going to close and start selling to get fiat for the second half of the stutter step.



1844. Post 10168215 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

The only reason we're going under $200 again is because the FPRs haven't attracted a new bear whale yet. as soon as we see a giant ask wall low enough, it's gonna get eaten like fried chicken at Sunday potluck.

This is why I'm only 2.5% margin long right now. Have to keep my powder dry to hunt bear whales.

so who's the sucker gonna be?



1845. Post 10169700 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

is anyone paying attention to the macroeconomic picture? The Swiss National Bank shocked world markets by removing it's peg to the Euro, causing it's value to skyrocket. Two systemic Greek banks are using an emergency liquidity tool at the ECB to try and prevent a bank run.  Oil Tanked and Gold spiked. This is 2008 all over again only worse this time.

How this will affect Bitcoin is anyone's guess, but I'm starting to think even my 2.5% margin long was way too premature.

Bank runs mean extreme DEFLATION of national currencies until the central banks ramp up the printing presses, start accepting used toilet paper as collateral and various other forms of counterfeiting.

Wealth is going to evaporate, credit is going to dry up and markets are going to crash with the exception of the safest government bonds (U.S., Swiss and maybe a few others).

I've warned many times for everyone to get their coins (and even fiat) off the exchanges if you aren't going to trade, but now I am saying it may soon be time to get your fiat out of the banks. 



 



1846. Post 10169867 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: Eamorr on January 15, 2015, 11:57:00 PM
is anyone paying attention to the macroeconomic picture? The Swiss National Bank shocked world markets by removing it's peg to the Euro, causing it's value to skyrocket. Two systemic Greek banks are using an emergency liquidity tool at the ECB to try and prevent a bank run.  Oil Tanked and Gold spiked. This is 2008 all over again only worse this time.

How this will affect Bitcoin is anyone's guess, but I'm starting to think even my 2.5% margin long was way too premature.

Bank runs mean extreme DEFLATION of national currencies until the central banks ramp up the printing presses, start accepting used toilet paper as collateral and various other forms of counterfeiting.

Wealth is going to evaporate, credit is going to dry up and markets are going to crash with the exception of the safest government bonds (U.S., Swiss and maybe a few others).

I've warned many times for everyone to get their coins (and even fiat) off the exchanges if you aren't going to trade, but now I am saying it may soon be time to get your fiat out of the banks.  



 

Potential bank run in the small Greek banks? So what.

What's the worst that can happen? The ECB step in and take over the banks' assets and loan books?

And besides, Greece is about 1% of the Euro (if even).

Greece is the canary in the coal mine. They are not having a liquidity crisis. They are having a solvency crisis. They owe an ass-load of money to Germany and if German banks are forced to write off those bad loans, it could very easily trigger a cascade as Portugal, Italy, and Ireland are in almost as bad shape. Just like when a margin call sets off a string of margin calls in bitcoin, these things can spiral out of control very fast.

Many many People, companies and national governments owe an extremely large amount of money that they can only make payments on by taking on new debt. If credit dries up, it presents a systemic risk that can only be halted by massive new liquidity injections from the central banks. But this only kicks the can down the road, as the crisis of 2008 was only postponed until this year. The only way to really fix it is to let it happen.  We need a massive severe depression to transfer the malinvested capital to competent managers.  But of course the banksters who run the world will not let that happen, so we'll get another round of QE counterfeiting to kick the can once again.




1847. Post 10170064 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: BTCtrader71 on January 16, 2015, 12:17:23 AM
The only reason we're going under $200 again is because the FPRs haven't attracted a new bear whale yet. as soon as we see a giant ask wall low enough, it's gonna get eaten like fried chicken at Sunday potluck.

This is why I'm only 2.5% margin long right now. Have to keep my powder dry to hunt bear whales.

so who's the sucker gonna be?

In past FPR raids, how much time is it between the crash and the spike? A few days?

The pattern gets flatter each time. It could be several days to two weeks before we go over $240 assuming the pattern is even still valid. That was by far the largest crash bitcoin has had since 2009 and reversing market momentum may be too much even for the FPRs. 

For example I would love to buy more BTC right now at what I consider bargain prices, but I can't afford it. I wonder how many people are in a similar situation. I would imagine there would be some whales looking to get in cheap, but with the macroeconomic picture deteriorating by the day, they may have bigger concerns than our little experimental currency.






1848. Post 10170095 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on January 16, 2015, 12:25:30 AM
...
Many many People, companies and national governments owe an extremely large amount of money that they can only make payments on by taking on new debt. If credit dries up, it presents a systemic risk that can only be halted by massive new liquidity injections from the central banks. ...

Who is the lucky guy all this debt is owed to?  Does Dawg The Bounty Hunter collect for him?  'Coz if he does, "People, companies and national governments" will surely pay.

It's owed to banks. These banks lend money to almost anyone and when it gets paid back, they keep the interest (profits), but when it doesn't get payed back, they run crying to the central banks for a bail-out. And they get a bail-out, which is why when the dust settles they go right back to loose lending standards. Privatized gains and socialized losses. It is a major reason why we are trying to create an alternative.



1849. Post 10170304 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on January 16, 2015, 12:46:38 AM
...
Many many People, companies and national governments owe an extremely large amount of money that they can only make payments on by taking on new debt. If credit dries up, it presents a systemic risk that can only be halted by massive new liquidity injections from the central banks. ...

Who is the lucky guy all this debt is owed to?  Does Dawg The Bounty Hunter collect for him?  'Coz if he does, "People, companies and national governments" will surely pay.

It's owed to banks. These banks lend money to almost anyone and when it gets paid back, they keep the interest (profits), but when it doesn't get payed back, they run crying to the central banks for a bail-out. And they get a bail-out, which is why when the dust settles they go right back to loose lending standards. Privatized gains and socialized losses. It is a major reason why we are trying to create an alternative.

I see.  So these banks are accumulating more and more of their own worthless paper?  And those who are dumb enough to hold massive savings in that worthless paper get poorer for it?  But the poor people, the ones who have no savings, lose nothing?
Can't think of a fairer system, to tell you the truth.  Go go banks!

I know you're trolling, but for the benefit of anyone else reading this exchange: the reason why the banks are in such trouble is because the money they have lent out is not their money. It belongs to their depositors. It belongs to us. If enough loans default, then not just the banks get wiped out, but we do too. There isn't even a fraction of enough money in the FDIC reserve to cover even one of the Big Five banks going under. FDIC insurance does not prevent bank runs. It just insures that they will all fail at once.



1850. Post 10170965 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on January 16, 2015, 01:10:05 AM
Could you remind me the last time FDIC has been unable to pay?  
If enough people go to the same coffee shop all at the same time, there'd be carnage.  Fortunately, shit like that hasn't happened yet, so while it remains a metaphysical possibility, color me not worried.

It is Bank deposit insurance. It is not banking system insurance. It was designed to prevent runs on individual banks, not on the entire banking system. It was dangerously undercapitalized in 2008 and required a bail-in and also had to hike rates to repay the emergency loan.



1851. Post 10171160 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Where's the volume? We're still $15 below the post-crash high and China is waking up soon.



1852. Post 10171387 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on January 16, 2015, 02:58:59 AM
Could you remind me the last time FDIC has been unable to pay?  
If enough people go to the same coffee shop all at the same time, there'd be carnage.  Fortunately, shit like that hasn't happened yet, so while it remains a metaphysical possibility, color me not worried.

It is Bank deposit insurance. It is not banking system insurance. It was designed to prevent runs on individual banks, not on the entire banking system. It was dangerously undercapitalized in 2008 and required a bail-in and also had to hike rates to repay the emergency loan.


So TL;DR: FDIC has never been unable to pay?  But you're worried that it might, some day?  Gotcha.
BTW, you say FDIC hiked its rates?  Yet I haven't noticed it on my bank statements.  I'm sure I'm unwittingly paying for those too, tho.  Perhaps through inflation?  Nope, the US dollar seems to be fine.  It's almost as if ...nah.
Also, don't seem to remember FDIC being bailed in/out.  Sauce?  (not that I doubt your learnings)

You don't seem to be arguing in good faith, so I'm not going to expend the effort of goggling sources. History is filled with firsts. Things never happen until they do. I'm trying to warn people to be careful with whom they trust their money, but if you think that warning is unwarranted, I don't think I'll be able to convince you otherwise.

"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."~ Mark Twain



1853. Post 10171537 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: aztecminer on January 16, 2015, 03:36:58 AM
is anyone paying attention to the macroeconomic picture? The Swiss National Bank shocked world markets by removing it's peg to the Euro, causing it's value to skyrocket. Two systemic Greek banks are using an emergency liquidity tool at the ECB to try and prevent a bank run.  Oil Tanked and Gold spiked. This is 2008 all over again only worse this time.

How this will affect Bitcoin is anyone's guess, but I'm starting to think even my 2.5% margin long was way too premature.

Bank runs mean extreme DEFLATION of national currencies until the central banks ramp up the printing presses, start accepting used toilet paper as collateral and various other forms of counterfeiting.

Wealth is going to evaporate, credit is going to dry up and markets are going to crash with the exception of the safest government bonds (U.S., Swiss and maybe a few others).

I've warned many times for everyone to get their coins (and even fiat) off the exchanges if you aren't going to trade, but now I am saying it may soon be time to get your fiat out of the banks.  



 

Potential bank run in the small Greek banks? So what.

What's the worst that can happen? The ECB step in and take over the banks' assets and loan books?

And besides, Greece is about 1% of the Euro (if even).

Greece is the canary in the coal mine. They are not having a liquidity crisis. They are having a solvency crisis. They owe an ass-load of money to Germany and if German banks are forced to write off those bad loans, it could very easily trigger a cascade as Portugal, Italy, and Ireland are in almost as bad shape. Just like when a margin call sets off a string of margin calls in bitcoin, these things can spiral out of control very fast.

Many many People, companies and national governments owe an extremely large amount of money that they can only make payments on by taking on new debt. If credit dries up, it presents a systemic risk that can only be halted by massive new liquidity injections from the central banks. But this only kicks the can down the road, as the crisis of 2008 was only postponed until this year. The only way to really fix it is to let it happen.  We need a massive severe depression to transfer the malinvested capital to competent managers.  But of course the banksters who run the world will not let that happen, so we'll get another round of QE counterfeiting to kick the can once again.




there are several other german divisions facing greece in this matters . if greece wants another bail-out then they might have to trade some of their gold reserves .

Greek gold reserves aren't even close to being enough. The only way out is for Greece to exit the EU and repay its debts in it's own massively devalued currency (Drachma?)  But the damage will have been done anyway, as credit tightens, defaults pile up and the money multiplier runs in reverse. If your debtor can't repay you, then lending him even more money to make the payments only makes the loss that much greater when the delayed Day of Reckoning finally comes.

After the PIIGS, Spain and even France will follow, countries falling like dominoes. Nobody will believe Mario Draghi as he already admitted that when things get bad, you have to lie. Christine Gerard and Janet Yellen- well, they're women. They will be more concerned about who gets the blame that trying to prevent disaster. When Central Bank jawboning doesn't work, increasingly draconian measures will be taken. Withdrawal limits at first, and eventually capital controls.

The central banks will rev into high gear to save their fellow bankers and leave everybody else high and dry. They will massively expand their balance sheets, essentially creating money out of thin air. They will accept garbage as collateral for zero interest loans to big banks but we won't be able to get credit at any interest rate. Then it will finally be clear who runs the world and for whom they run it. (Hint: it ain't you)



1854. Post 10172157 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on January 16, 2015, 05:07:00 AM


TL;DR:  You got nothing.  You make up "facts," and, when called on it, retort with "don't seem to be arguing in good faith."
Why not warn people about our uppity negro Obama letting filthy wetbacks put money in the same banks where white folks keep theirs?  Or is aztecminer doing a good job?  Why not warn them about 9/11 too, just to be an all-in-one libertard cliche?  Oh wait, BitChick's financial adviser from the nuthouse, rptiela or whatever his name, already got that covered.  Okay then, everything seems to be in order...

Have I missed anything ugaise?


I have a friend who is the CEO of a local bank and we were talking over Christmas Dinner about it. He complained that his FDIC premiums went up even though it's a very conservative bank with high lending standards but he was getting effectively punished because of misbehavior by other banks. The bank had to pay for the premiums by either taking it out of their profit margin or by increasing fees such as NSF charges.

You are poisoning the well by lumping in real problems with conspiracy theories that I have never even mentioned and are completely irrelevant anyway. That's what I mean by arguing in bad faith.




1855. Post 10172232 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: criptix on January 16, 2015, 06:05:12 AM
https://www.bitfinex.com/pages/announcements/?id=31

What do you guys think about this "tether" thing ?

it seems to be a US nubits

Quote
Transparent

Tether currency is 100% backed by actual assets in our reserve account and can be viewed and verified in real-time.

might be really interesting Smiley

Well it reintroduces the trusted third party, the elimination of which was the main innovation of Bitcoin. How it can be 100% transparent is something I'll have to look into more carefully before I can comment on.

EDIT: ok, so they hold their reserves in a bank account. That makes them vulnerable to the bank going under, assets seized by the government, embezzlement, etc. AND they require KYC compliance.

There would be some applications where this would be useful, kind of like DWOLLA was used to make deposits and withdrawals to MtGox, but basically this is just a faster lower cost wire transfer.



1856. Post 10172354 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: DaRude on January 16, 2015, 06:39:25 AM


Not sure how it works myself but you can't use exchange without trusting 3rd party.

You can if you're a miner.



1857. Post 10266453 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

WTF?? coinbase.com/luna just says "to the moon".  Have we been punked?
Seems like an unprofessional thing to do for a supposedly neutral exchange.



1858. Post 10266489 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: findftp on January 26, 2015, 02:01:53 PM
Well, bummer.

Quote
A U.S. Based Bitcoin Exchange

A safe and secure bitcoin exchange run by Coinbase, the leading bitcoin company.

Lets sell the news.

I agree. Dump incoming



1859. Post 10266637 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: YEAROFBULL15 on January 26, 2015, 02:06:18 PM
WTF?? coinbase.com/luna just says "to the moon".  Have we been punked?
Seems like an unprofessional thing to do for a supposedly neutral exchange.

https://exchange.coinbase.com/


looks like market was expecting more

Wait until the fiat starts coming in on coinbase

says "not yet available in my state".  Damn. I wanted to be the first person in Louisiana to short the shit out of this pump. Guess I have to do it in Hong Kong.



1860. Post 10266733 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on January 26, 2015, 02:17:18 PM
so, what can we expect now?
Price will go below 260 I think.

Try $230. We're never gonna beat the Four Punch Raiders who own this market unless we front run them.



1861. Post 10266769 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

What the hell is an exchange doing with a "To the Moon!!" website?? If the NYSE or NASDAQ did that, the SEC would shut them down. These guys are not quite ready for prime time yet.



1862. Post 10266946 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Where's all the tards buying these "cheap coins"? Volume just went to shit.



1863. Post 10267000 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: ivyleague1985 on January 26, 2015, 02:42:09 PM
Keep buying, cause it looks very "sustainable"



Organic Growth

I sold before when it was $306  and bought at $282. Knew they dump on news :/

Lol, did the same, with slightly worse numbers though

I also thought it was a bear trap.

The huge volume over the weekend already washed out almost all cheap coins bought under $200. Don't think there are still tons of profit taking coins to be sold.

Bullshit. I bought near $200 on CB and my coins haven't come in yet. I was praying I would get them before the pump was over. Now they're saying Wednesday. If the market is anywhere near where it is now I'll dump like a motherfucker. I don't think I'm alone.



1864. Post 10267028 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Here comes the BOOM!!


what, you thought a 28% pump in 24 HRs wouldn't retrace?



1865. Post 10267209 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 26, 2015, 02:46:16 PM
Keep buying, cause it looks very "sustainable"



Organic Growth

I sold before when it was $306  and bought at $282. Knew they dump on news :/

Lol, did the same, with slightly worse numbers though

I also thought it was a bear trap.

The huge volume over the weekend already washed out almost all cheap coins bought under $200. Don't think there are still tons of profit taking coins to be sold.

Bullshit. I bought near $200 on CB and my coins haven't come in yet. I was praying I would get them before the pump was over. Now they're saying Wednesday. If the market is anywhere near where it is now I'll dump like a motherfucker. I don't think I'm alone.

This four business day waiting period sucks. has already cost me thousands.



1866. Post 10268489 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: Afrikoin on January 26, 2015, 03:36:26 PM
$260 retracement. 6 hours till Asia opens is enough time to bring down oversold levels on 6h bitfinex. This is a retracement. question is 23%, 38% or 50%

I'm margin short until 23, sitting in cash till 38 and going back all-in @ 50%. But FIRST, we gotta give the Chinese panic monkeys at least a day to give us our coins back.



1867. Post 10268643 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

All these these little mini-pumps are doing is giving big fish an opportunity to cut their losses easier. There are no permabulls left with any fiat to spend. Hell, it's barely even registering on the five minute chart and volume is tapering off. Far more likely to get a surprise dump now than a surprise buy. $20 cheaper and it's a different story, but not now.



1868. Post 10269029 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: Dilla on January 26, 2015, 05:37:13 PM
If we can get topside of 300 again today or tomorrow, that would strike a lot of confidence for people for a bull market

LOL all ya need are a few million dollars on each exchange. No prob, right? But what if the Chinese wake up and we're still down? You think they still lead this market or they follow like lemmings now?



1869. Post 10269274 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: ivyleague1985 on January 26, 2015, 06:00:16 PM
This week will be fruitful to all bitcoin traders.

We will pull back a bit to $266 (a major support level seen before) to digest the sharp growth yesterday. And then we will stand firmly above $300 in the mid-week. We will finally touch $350 by the end of the week.

The waves we saw so far are impulsive than corrective. If you do wave counting, you will see it is far away from the ending phase. So buy on the dip and ride the winner.

BTW, don't touch litecoin, coz it is dying and it is just taking a free ride from bitcoin. Bitcoin is at the edge of mainstream acceptance, and it will enjoy this huge first comer advantage and wipe out the alt coins.

Told you that $266 is a major support. Entry point around $266 will be very nice for breakout believers.

There's less that 2K worth of bids down to $266. You're dreaming if you think it will hold. The only buyers right now are people taking profits on their shorts. Those traders won't get back in until there is upward momentum.



1870. Post 10269698 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 26, 2015, 06:04:51 PM
This week will be fruitful to all bitcoin traders.

We will pull back a bit to $266 (a major support level seen before) to digest the sharp growth yesterday. And then we will stand firmly above $300 in the mid-week. We will finally touch $350 by the end of the week.

The waves we saw so far are impulsive than corrective. If you do wave counting, you will see it is far away from the ending phase. So buy on the dip and ride the winner.

BTW, don't touch litecoin, coz it is dying and it is just taking a free ride from bitcoin. Bitcoin is at the edge of mainstream acceptance, and it will enjoy this huge first comer advantage and wipe out the alt coins.

Told you that $266 is a major support. Entry point around $266 will be very nice for breakout believers.

There's less that 2K worth of bids down to $266. You're dreaming if you think it will hold. The only buyers right now are people taking profits on their shorts. Those traders won't get back in until there is upward momentum.

TOLD YA!!!!



1871. Post 10269755 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: SirChiko on January 26, 2015, 06:50:57 PM
Just a reminder of what this big bulltrap we had lately was:


I'm gonna spell it out for you guys:




Coinbase news was a pump&dump, exactly like the LTC on Huobi pump and all the other countless attempts to dump higher!
Insiders buy before anyone knows anything, all the other people buy at the announcement and at the countdown. Smart traders dump as soon as the site is online!


It's not difficult to understand! It's always the same thing.

Good thing coinbase is bringing regulation to BTC right? LOOOOOOOOL






The crash has officially resumed.
You're welcome.

It was just correction and it didn't even fall back to 245 but it stopped at 265.

What the fuck makes you think it's over? 



1872. Post 10269807 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: damiano on January 26, 2015, 06:54:41 PM
Think we're heading back into the 230's

I'm thinking 220s.



1873. Post 10269892 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

from $260 to $265? that dead cat didn't bounce too far. Nine hours before the Panda bears come out to play.



1874. Post 10270020 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: dreamspark on January 26, 2015, 07:05:18 PM
from $260 to $265? that dead cat didn't bounce too far. Nine hours before the Panda bears come out to play.

Whats your buy price?

I'm not even going to START covering my short until the $250s. @$222 I'm all-in and when I see some upward momentum, we're gonna squeeze the shorts all the way to the high $300s.



1875. Post 10270092 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: fonsie on January 26, 2015, 07:21:44 PM
I need this in my life.

That's really the most sad thing I have ever read on a forum. OK, if you really need this trolling to make your life meaningfull, I'm going to let you troll in peace.

This coming from YOU??? Pot...kettle...you get the idea.



1876. Post 10270172 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: DefendKebab on January 26, 2015, 07:28:23 PM
i hope to pick up some coins @ 230 to dump @ 310  Smiley

It's not going to $310. It's going to $350. If you dump @ $310, I will buy them, but first we have to see the south side of $240.



1877. Post 10270363 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 26, 2015, 07:37:45 PM
really the truth of the matter is anything under $300 is still a great buy.

Exactly.



I don't think you are factoring in the Four Punch Raiders. These guys make the order book their bitch. The bear market likely isn't over until after the next short squeeze and then later a failed attempt at a long squeeze. If $266 holds on the retest two months or so from now. Since apparently I am the only one who knows both what they are doing and how to stop it (and is willing to do so), that long squeeze will likely not fail. I don't have nearly the funds to do it on my own and all my "allies" will be much weaker after this next round trip.



1878. Post 10270425 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: YEAROFBULL15 on January 26, 2015, 07:50:42 PM
I'm waiting for that "Winklevoss on CNBC after commercial" pump.


They cant say anything about whether the ETF is likely,

They have never sold any bitcoins,

They believe it can have a market cap of 400 billion, or even trillions

The Winklevi could stop this bear market without even putting additional capital at risk. all they have to do is wait for this little correction to level out (and it will, no sharp "V" drop), go margin long with their 1%, short the fuck out of it after it goes over 400, slam it back down to $270 and cover. Boom. but they won't do it because they're the kind of WASPy Ivy league entitlement princesses who would  let a Jewish kid steal their best idea and give them a measly $50 million for it.



1879. Post 10270929 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: damiano on January 26, 2015, 08:20:03 PM
Hmmm have we found support?

Um, no. We are stalling for seven hours so we can get the full Chinese panic from the next big dump.



1880. Post 10271046 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: inca on January 26, 2015, 08:31:19 PM
really the truth of the matter is anything under $300 is still a great buy.

Exactly.



I don't think you are factoring in the Four Punch Raiders. These guys make the order book their bitch. The bear market likely isn't over until after the next short squeeze and then later a failed attempt at a long squeeze. If $266 holds on the retest two months or so from now. Since apparently I am the only one who knows both what they are doing and how to stop it (and is willing to do so), that long squeeze will likely not fail. I don't have nearly the funds to do it on my own and all my "allies" will be much weaker after this next round trip.

Four punch what?  Huh

Billyjoeallen thinks he is the only person to have noticed the market has been bossed about by a few large players for the last few months. Smiley

Bossed around for the last year. The 720 whale...remember him? that was the FPR in the first really recognizable intentional short squeeze. Every cycle they get stronger and the bulls get weaker. Silicon valley seems to be oblivious. All the big money backers are dumping money into infrastructure while the supply of our commodity is in the hands of people who don't give a shit about bitcoin except to suck the life out of it.



1881. Post 10271408 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

BTC-e isn't following. Each attempt at a bull counter attack is weaker than the last. Time is running out before China wakes up, has a cup of tea, and takes a shit on the order book.

Yes, I use the Oxford comma.



1882. Post 10271516 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: YourMother on January 26, 2015, 09:36:56 PM
That graph looks like Satan and they are still buying. I'm pretty fascinated by it. It shows the delusion...

Only small fry are buying, unless it's someone sneaky making lots of little buys. Being able to see the volume is a huge advantage to bitcoin trading.

Looking at the order book, I figure it would only take a 3k BTC dump on three exchanges to start a Chinese stampede for the exits. That's a heluva return on your money.

How low will it go? Anyone besides me have any fiat powder left?



1883. Post 10271543 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

BFX, Huobi and BTC-e order books are all bearish (more asks than bids in the trading range). Only Stamp is bullish, but for how long?



1884. Post 10271688 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: kurious on January 26, 2015, 09:53:13 PM
That graph looks like Satan and they are still buying. I'm pretty fascinated by it. It shows the delusion...

Only small fry are buying, unless it's someone sneaky making lots of little buys. Being able to see the volume is a huge advantage to bitcoin trading.

Looking at the order book, I figure it would only take a 3k BTC dump on three exchanges to start a Chinese stampede for the exits. That's a heluva return on your money.

How low will it go? Anyone besides me have any fiat powder left?

Not enough to change the tide, enough to help my stash, though - a few thousand $ - not nearly market changing.

A whale or two spotting a soft target easily makes everyone (posting) here pretty irrelevant.  Be nice if Coinbase beefs up the market - but it looks way off yet, and may only mean money moving from (say) Stamp.  New participating fiat would be very nice, but a rally will bring it in, not Coinbase.

True enough. I'm in a similar position. The only reason I'm margin short right now is so that I'll have the ability to buy more when and if it  drops, but that means no sleep tonight. No fucking way I'm sleeping margin short. There could easily be surprises in either direction, but the downside looks much more likely.




1885. Post 10271704 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: dakota neat on January 26, 2015, 10:04:45 PM
Please note! If Current daily candle will be shooting star - there is a high chance price will revisit $100

DOOM.
Yea but plenty of room for exit strategy as for now. I would not wait too long though since it is 6 am in China as we speak. To be continued...

China bought the fuck out of bitcoin last night.

China no longer leads the market. They just follow the crowd. what they do is give momentum to whatever direction the market is going. They are cattle and the real battle is between the rustlers and the cowboys.



1886. Post 10271902 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 26, 2015, 10:26:08 PM

True enough. I'm in a similar position. The only reason I'm margin short right now is so that I'll have the ability to buy more when and if it  drops, but that means no sleep tonight. No fucking way I'm sleeping margin short. There could easily be surprises in either direction, but the downside looks much more likely.


you wtf?!

BJA ... how far have you fallen kid?

Hey, you know I'm always net long (if you count cold storage), but I need ammo to defend the bottom. I don't think it's an organic market, so I'm trying to take a little power away from the people that control it.

We're seeing some volume here and I'm getting a little nervous. There will be a short squeeze sometime this month and I'm not gonna be short when it happens. I got my finger on the trigger to close my position if it gets close to my base price, but we're some distance from that.



1887. Post 10271950 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: Afrikoin on January 26, 2015, 10:28:12 PM


That only applies if we didn't experience a final bottom. your chart assumes its a bear market always.

That is NOT the short squeeze. It's the stutter step (the fake out) BEFORE the short squeeze. Volume tells the story. We're going to $350, but I dunno how far down we're going first.

Nobody is more aware than me how dangerous it is to be short right now, but we're still up over 27% in the last week and I think there will be more of a correction first. volume right now still shows more resistance than support.



1888. Post 10272005 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Somebody really doesn't want that 1HR moving average to cross over.



1889. Post 10272056 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: blatchcorn on January 26, 2015, 10:53:03 PM


That only applies if we didn't experience a final bottom. your chart assumes its a bear market always.

That is NOT the short squeeze. It's the stutter step (the fake out) BEFORE the short squeeze. Volume tells the story. We're going to $350, but I dunno how far down we're going first.

Nobody is more aware than me how dangerous it is to be short right now, but we're still up over 27% in the last week and I think there will be more of a correction first. volume right now still shows more resistance than support.
I'm not even sure what pattern it is supposed to be but it looks really the same!

Also it is 6:50 am in China. Dump maystart anytime now. Fasten seat belt.
People find bullshit patterns everywhere.

True, but I've made a lot of money following this one.



1890. Post 10272065 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Aaaaand four hours of low volume melt-up wiped out.



1891. Post 10272089 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: drbrock on January 26, 2015, 10:55:52 PM
So is the new bottom around 240/250? with another swing up after?

There is no certainty, only probabilities.



1892. Post 10272116 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on January 26, 2015, 10:59:22 PM
Aaaaand four hours of low volume melt-up wiped out.

Yeah... but they needed to dump 2500btc to break 270$. Don't know  Smiley

OK, you need to understand that the pump and dump is basically over. Somebody is walking it down now, selling into his own buy orders just so he'll have more to dump on your head when you think the coast is clear.  I've seen it before. Hell, I've done it before, but this is someone or some people with serious money and coins to play with.



1893. Post 10272163 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 26, 2015, 11:10:04 PM
Aaaaand four hours of low volume melt-up wiped out.

4 hours? It was at $260 4 hours ago.

This dip barely touched $270.

Feeling bearish today?

Yes, for today. Tomorrow is another story.



1894. Post 10272244 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: mymenace on January 26, 2015, 11:19:21 PM


That only applies if we didn't experience a final bottom. your chart assumes its a bear market always.

That is NOT the short squeeze. It's the stutter step (the fake out) BEFORE the short squeeze. Volume tells the story. We're going to $350, but I dunno how far down we're going first.

Nobody is more aware than me how dangerous it is to be short right now, but we're still up over 27% in the last week and I think there will be more of a correction first. volume right now still shows more resistance than support.
I'm not even sure what pattern it is supposed to be but it looks really the same!

Also it is 6:50 am in China. Dump maystart anytime now. Fasten seat belt.

careful it is a3day chart by the look of it and the three days has not completed yet

The circle (ok elipse) on the left should be one peak farther left. This snapshot conveniently misses the volume. The volume of the crash to $275 followed by a lower volume peak, a lower volume dip and then the short squeeze. We've had the crash and the low volume peak on this cycle but not the high volume short squeeze (yet).



1895. Post 10272704 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 26, 2015, 11:57:30 PM
Aaaaand four hours of low volume melt-up wiped out.

4 hours? It was at $260 4 hours ago.

This dip barely touched $270.

Feeling bearish today?

Yes, for today. Tomorrow is another story.

Understandable.

I think we all knew there would be a profit-taking/retracement/beartrap/correction today after last night's shenanigans.

It's just a matter of how far. I'll stick with my call from last night (and reaffirmed this morning) and say that if we finish over $260 I'll consider the day to be a success.

Did you trade that pump dude?

Well yeah, I bought up to $245 and sold the whole way up from $260 and went margin short when the news from CB turned out to be a big yawn. I still have a bunch of incoming coins from CB and Circle from when I went over my "instant buy" limit, so I have some wiggle room in both directions.

I guess I also have a bunch of incoming fiat from selling the pump, but I'm starting to wonder if I'll have enough time to buy the dip with that damn four business day wait.

EDIT: I closed my short with a much smaller profit than if I had covered near $260. I don't wanna sleep in a leveraged position even though I still think it's going lower. I got too greedy I guess.



1896. Post 10272814 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 27, 2015, 12:28:08 AM

It seems I don't have the nerve to sell and hope it drops. Do you keep to a trading strategy? or listen to your guts?

For now I'm trading the Four Punch Pattern.

*** Of course it drops after I close my short. Oh well, a small profit is better than none. Still 90% fiat though. Got plenty of dry powder.




1897. Post 10272893 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: dreamspark on January 27, 2015, 12:40:56 AM

It seems I don't have the nerve to sell and hope it drops. Do you keep to a trading strategy? or listen to your guts?

For now I'm trading the Four Punch Pattern.

*** Of course it drops after I close my short. Oh well, a small profit is better than none. Still 90% fiat though. Got plenty of dry powder.



What, you mean you closed your short after convincing me to re-open some around $277  Wink

You should be thanking me. Someone was prolly waiting for me to cover before dumping.  Tongue



1898. Post 10273437 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: kurious on January 27, 2015, 01:13:02 AM

It seems I don't have the nerve to sell and hope it drops. Do you keep to a trading strategy? or listen to your guts?

For now I'm trading the Four Punch Pattern.

*** Of course it drops after I close my short. Oh well, a small profit is better than none. Still 90% fiat though. Got plenty of dry powder.



You should have hung on until China opened. You had a logical strategy and let emotion in!

Totally good call, then you closed...Huh??!!!

C'mon BJA - remove emotion and stick with it.  It's what you would've said...  

Probably 250 dip at least?  You called it!

At least I can go to sleep tonight.

Don't worry. I'm still something like 87% fiat. I don't think there will be a sharp "V" shaped bottom but a leveling off and then a short squeeze, so I think I'm looking good. I've got about five grand of profits coming in and if it stays low long enough for them to hit my bank account, I'll dump them right back in and increase my coin stash.

Best case scenario is a true double bottom (higher low on higher volume). I have no idea how low we'll go other than what I already said: possibly the $220s, but that's only if we get enough panic dumping to initiate a margin call cascade.



1899. Post 10273476 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 27, 2015, 01:54:00 AM
coinbase showed us the moon ...



ROTFL!! Got that right. They have egg on their faces. Serves them right for pumping when they have no business telling people which way to trade.



1900. Post 10273520 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: damiano on January 27, 2015, 02:20:59 AM
How many of you are currently short?

Mark my words: shorts are gonna get squeezed within a month. I'm calling a $350 top, but first it's gotta go low enough to get all the bargain hunters on board.



1901. Post 10273546 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: Venusianism on January 27, 2015, 02:01:57 AM
A fair few longs being liquidated on 796 futures. Another sleepless night coming up I think.

When there is blood in the streets!

Blood is like 200. I was there

False. There's less than 1.5M bitcoin users on the entire planet. Blood is $115.

1.5 M with what, an average of less than 10 coins each? if we all wanted an average of 11, there wouldn't be enough to go around, even if the price hit $10,000. 

This too shall pass, Gentlemen. Be greedy when others are fearful.



1902. Post 10273593 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: dreamspark on January 27, 2015, 02:30:41 AM
How many of you are currently short?

Closed mine sub 260, need some sleep. Hoping it doesnt move too much either way in the next ~10 hours.


Mark my words: shorts are gonna get squeezed within a month. I'm calling a $350 top, but first it's gotta go low enough to get all the bargain hunters on board.

Shorts are already down 7k in 24 hours. We need some sideways and for the amount of shorts to go up before we can really squeeze them.

We'll get plenty of sideways, I think. The Four Punch pattern gets flatter each time. This CB pump put a little kink in the works, but the undercapitalized will have to sell and the get rich quick crowd will have to get bored and drop out first.  With my cold storage stash, pile of fiat and incoming profits, I can wait.



1903. Post 10273659 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 27, 2015, 02:37:57 AM
How many of you are currently short?

Closed mine sub 260, need some sleep. Hoping it doesnt move too much either way in the next ~10 hours.


Mark my words: shorts are gonna get squeezed within a month. I'm calling a $350 top, but first it's gotta go low enough to get all the bargain hunters on board.

Shorts are already down 7k in 24 hours. We need some sideways and for the amount of shorts to go up before we can really squeeze them.

We'll get plenty of sideways, I think. The Four Punch pattern gets flatter each time.

So the pattern should be sideways sideways long squeeze short squeeze?

(One fish two fish red fish blue fish?)


No, it's crash/bounce, dip, short squeeze and second bounce. We are currently at the dip phase.



1904. Post 10273719 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 27, 2015, 02:50:16 AM


No, it's crash/bounce, dip, short squeeze and second bounce. We are currently at the dip phase.

So basically we're probably looking at a double bottom. I can live with that

Not a true double bottom because there will be less volume than the long squeeze to $166. There's not enough coins on the exchange to make it higher volume than that. When the margin longs got liquidated, all those coins went to the Four Punch Raiders and they will not get squeezed because they are not operating with leverage. They have enough fiat and coins to bleed us without taking the risk.  That's why after the short squeeze there will be a bounce and then another crash.

I'm getting out after the short squeeze. I'm gonna use the money to generate a second source of income so I can just keep buying a little at a time until this nightmare is over. Prolly after the Chinese give us back every single last coin or some third world shit currency becomes even less attractive than BTC and we get another Cypress type event.



1905. Post 10274134 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: dreamspark on January 27, 2015, 03:25:59 AM
Dumps seem to be getting weaker

Yep but so are the mini bounces. = sideways.

Oh yeah, maximum pain for everybody. All the bears have to do is wait. Sideways=bearish



1906. Post 10274148 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: ImI on January 27, 2015, 03:59:16 AM

there is a good probability that they will announce both at once, the exchange and the ETF. both will work hand in hand.

Another dump or another pump and dump? The U.S. market will be split between two major exchanges meaning we will have to arbitrage and liquidity will be divided. I hope I'll at least get more instant purchases out of the deal.



1907. Post 10278288 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

I don't believe $250 was the bottom. It's just too easy. It's gotta flatten out before going back up. The FPR needs more shorts to squeeze. I think the low will come this weekend.

Our jobs as decentral bankers is to reduce volatility, not to pump. Day trading is not an easy money get rich quick kind of thing. We simply supply liquidity when it's needed and remove liquidity when it isn't.



1908. Post 10282649 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: dreamspark on January 27, 2015, 02:34:35 PM
I don't believe $250 was the bottom. It's just too easy. It's gotta flatten out before going back up. The FPR needs more shorts to squeeze. I think the low will come this weekend.

Our jobs as decentral bankers is to reduce volatility, not to pump. Day trading is not an easy money get rich quick kind of thing. We simply supply liquidity when it's needed and remove liquidity when it isn't.

Shorting or waiting it out?

Waiting. Leverage is something you use after a big move, not before.



1909. Post 10282790 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.53h):

Quote from: Afrikoin on January 27, 2015, 09:23:10 PM




I wouldn't recommend shorting, but waiting for lower prices seems prudent as I agree with the poster that we are at the same point in the cycle. 




1910. Post 10284177 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: camolist on January 27, 2015, 11:56:19 PM
bitfinex is fun

all positions closed and up 1.505 BTC 0.27 from interest remainder margin trading


never crossed my mind till a week or so back you could margin trade with btc as backing assumed you would need USD

Well, yeah. In the bull market you want BTC to be almost all your backing because your tradable balance goes up with BTC price even with no open positions.




1911. Post 10284226 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: damiano on January 28, 2015, 02:00:38 AM
think its safe to sleep in btc? :/

Probably not

any suggestion for placing a buy order if theres a dip in the next 6 hours? Smiley

I have bids starting at 255 all the way down to 220.  A lot of people are in fiat waiting for it to drop lower.

Mine are from $250 down to $220 with some coins and fiat left over for market trades. Already sold the coins I picked up in the 250s at $265.



1912. Post 10284253 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 28, 2015, 01:19:44 AM
Is anyone going to pick up 180 dollar coins if we see them?

Yes.

I will, but I won't have much fiat left to spend.



1913. Post 10284479 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

If it goes back up to near $270 I'm gonna sell a few more. I have some that I bought sub $200 that didn't get delivered until today. I should have even more coming in tomorrow that I bought just over $200 and I'll sell those too.




1914. Post 10284621 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 28, 2015, 03:10:28 AM
I have some that I bought sub $200 that didn't get delivered until today.

How does delivery of bitcoins take more than an hour or so for 6 verifications?

I thought that one of Bitcoin's selling points was fast transfers.

I'm talking about coins I bought thru CB and Circle using ACH tranfer. It takes four business days to clear if you buy more than a thousand dollars worth, which of course I did.



1915. Post 10284940 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: shmadz on January 28, 2015, 03:40:55 AM
$250 is the new $350...we will again just trickle down to $200.

Then over the next 3 months we see more bankruptcies and etc.  Not really effecting the price.

At $200, will the next BIG STORY be down to double digits or $450....nobody knows.


Place your bets and have fun.



I've recently become less bullish on price. Previously I was buying set amount of CAD per month that we stay below 400 CAD.

Moving forward I will be only buying a set amount of BTC per month so if this thing does indeed keep going south, I'll be losing less and less each month.

That makes no sense. You should stick to you original plan. You get more for your money. What if it goes up? Are you then going to start buying thousands of dollars worth every month?



1916. Post 10298678 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

$220s. I called it. Now if it goes lower, I buy even MOAR!!!

Oh yeah. trading the pattern.   BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC Grin



1917. Post 10298789 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on January 29, 2015, 12:35:31 PM
6300 to 220 @ Finex  Grin

Cmon finex traders, show you balls and push china higher this time. Enough of their bear games

The plan is to creep sideways and slightly down so that short sellers will take positions and then we're gonna pump 'til we squeeze 'em.



1918. Post 10299115 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: tarmi on January 29, 2015, 12:50:37 PM
6300 to 220 @ Finex  Grin

Cmon finex traders, show you balls and push china higher this time. Enough of their bear games

The plan is to creep sideways and slightly down so that short sellers will take positions and then we're gonna pump 'til we squeeze 'em.


I would say it is quite the opposite. we are waiting for more longs to open and then we will squeeze them like bugs on our way to 120 $.

Bring it on, Pal. I'm margin long right now with a liquidation price of $28.94, so you'll have to squeeze tighter than that. Oh yeah, and I still have three grand left of the $5,000 I had stockpiled for this entirely predictable little dip. That's cash not margin.

We'll see who gets squeezed.



1919. Post 10302770 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

I am declaring the billyjoeallen pump officially on. After my initial buy of $2,000 worth today, I will buy a minimum of 1 BTC per day for the next 100 days regardless of price going up or downor until the shorts get squeezed whichever comes first.



1920. Post 10316402 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

All the chart signals say we're going down, but I'm too scared to sell because prices are already so damn cheep I'm afraid I'll lose my coins. And forget about short selling. I wouldn't dream of it.

So you guys sell. Somebody's got to and I want your coins. Last weekend we didn't exactly have a dip. I'm thinking there are too many of us stockpiling fiat for the weekend.

GIMME YOUR COINZ, DUMPMONKEYS!!!!



1921. Post 10340830 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

wHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON? IT'S TOO EARLY FOR THE SHORT SQUEEZE and it's too high for a dead cat bounce. I ain't selling or buying shit until I find out.

Who's pumping? It ain't the Four Punch Raiders cuz this ain't in the pattern.



1922. Post 10340902 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: damiano on February 03, 2015, 12:04:27 AM
earned 18$ on the bounce  Smiley

I got lucky and shorted 200 contracts at 246

I don't buy this pump

I don't either but I'm not selling into it because <$250 is just too damn cheap to sell. I'm just hodling with my measly 58 BTC and small pile of fiat until it either goes over $300 or back down sub $220.

Is it bears covering their shorts? New mystery pumpers? Who the hell is buying @ $240 who had almost a week to buy cheaper than that?



1923. Post 10342265 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Look, we're likely going back down and everybody knows we're going back down unless we aren't, in which case somebody knows we're going up because he has enough fiat to float the entire worldwide market. What're the odds of that? Somewhere between zero and fifty percent which means whether you're in fiat or coin, it's too damn risky to be leveraged either way unless you posses some asymmetric information.

 




1924. Post 10358672 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

The FPR pattern says we're going down, possibly below $200 before the short squeeze. In hindsight I should traded that dead cat bounce to ~ $247 but hindsight is always 20/20. It's too dam risky to sell with prices so low even though they are probably going lower. There will be people who miss the train (and by train I mean the short rapid rise to ~$350 squeezing the shorts before resuming the downward path).

I'm not really comfortable sitting on this much cash. I'm more of a "let it ride" kind of guy, so c'mon, dumpmonkeys, dump! Gimme your coins. It's too volatile of an asset to invest in. You can't handle the swings. Get out now and save yourselves!!!





1925. Post 10358780 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: octaft on February 04, 2015, 07:19:08 PM
No telling how bad off the permabulls would be in this war without General William Joseph Allen to guide them.

"Four punch raiders, incoming! Prepare the counterattack!"

I'm no general. More like Jeff Goldblum in Independence Day. I just found a pattern.

There's no way we can beat them in a head-on fight. They are far too powerful and smart. We have to front run them. That means do what they do before they do it and that means start making small buys unless you've already got some coin and then keep buying small until the chart levels out and then make BIG DAMN BUYS until the bears get margin calls.

and then SELL everything and then some. The best time to go short is immediately after a short squeeze just like the best time to go long is right after a long squeeze.



1926. Post 10367263 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Thanks for the coins, Dumpmonkeys!  Keep it up; I've got thousands and thousands of fiat FRNs I need to get rid of before the short squeeze.



1927. Post 10367309 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: fonzie on February 05, 2015, 04:25:51 PM
Laughing at bears - check
Cheap coins - check
Short squeeze incoming - check
I
I
I
I
V
Sub 200 incoming  Smiley

I HOPE you're right. 5 BTC for a grand, can you believe it? I can't wait. Gives me a boner just thinking about it.



1928. Post 10367367 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on February 05, 2015, 04:27:20 PM
Thanks for the coins, Dumpmonkeys!  Keep it up; I've got thousands and thousands of fiat FRNs I need to get rid of before the short squeeze.

Also, there are millions of bitcoins owned by unknown people with unknown intentions.
Just don't take out any loans to buy those "cheap coins".

How'z that any different than all the billions of unknown people who own dollars with unknown intentions? Worst case scenario is I end up stiffing some evil banksters and they put a hit on my credit rating, preventing me from going even deeper into hock. Meanwhile I still have coins that I can take across any border and hide from any tax authority, ex wife or creditor and spend in a hundred thousand different places.




1929. Post 10367467 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 05, 2015, 04:36:49 PM
Thanks for the coins, Dumpmonkeys!  Keep it up; I've got thousands and thousands of fiat FRNs I need to get rid of before the short squeeze.

Also, there are millions of bitcoins owned by unknown people with unknown intentions.
Just don't take out any loans to buy those "cheap coins".

How'z that any different than all the billions of unknown people who own dollars with unknown intentions? ...

Well, dollar criminals don't keep diaries, so there's that...

They don't? There's an entire industry of forensic accountants who beg to differ.



1930. Post 10367532 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Imagine if they remade Wolf of Wall Street only instead of the bimbo taping stacks of hundreds to her naked body she just had one microSD card to hide...somewhere.



1931. Post 10367749 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on February 05, 2015, 04:55:58 PM
you don't know who owns the large amount of BTC.

You may say that unknown people managed to get billions of BTC by bad ways, but they probably already sold most of them...

Yes, exactly! I don't know who owns the majority of BTC. Also you and the majority of the market doesn't know that. They only have their high hopes of easy riches. No facts nor certainties to base their speculations on. It's all blind gambling with degenerate gamblers trying to mask their addiction with illusionary fantasies.

Well I do know who owns the majority of USD and it's a bunch of thugs who use the government to do their dirty work for them. "Intellectual Property" owners who use law enforcement to keep me from copying books, movies, songs, drugs, etc that I already own. Those poor impoverished drug, movie and music industry execs, software moguls and J.K. fucking Rowling. They're so poor they have to go to some soup kitchen called Spago to commiserate with each other.

I'm not looking for easy riches. I'm looking for freedom.



1932. Post 10367931 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Bitcoin is the Wild West, but if you look back to the actual Wild West you will see some parallels. Everyone knew that back then that all that land would become extremely valuable some day if only they had the will, brains, balls and luck to hold onto it long enough. There were all sorts of bad actors and the guy with the white hat didn't always win, but eventually they were all proven right.

Will Rogers once said "Buy land; they don't make it anymore." It's a humorous way of saying that with a continually growing population any commodity in finite supply will have to gain value. Supply and demand, Baby.

But ok, let's look at a much shorter time frame. There is this little country called Greece that I think is somewhere close to Cypress that is in the early stages of a massive country-wide bank run. Now we all know that when our banskter overlords start seeing a run for the exits, they generally try to discourage that behavior by instituting capital controls. So how do you think these poor Greek bastards are going to escape with some fraction of what's left of their wealth? Put it in frozen gyros? ceramic Parthenon figurines? or maybe the more enterprising among them might get some crypto and convince a few of their friends to do the same.




1933. Post 10368054 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: YourMother on February 05, 2015, 05:32:19 PM
^

Oh, another one that thinks that the population of Greece will adopt bitcoin. Haha!


Actually I think the majority of Greeks will be pimping out their daughters for cans of Spam, but a few will make out like bandits just like the Rooskies who bought up all those formerly state-owned businesses when shares were trading for pennies and then later became oligarchs.

Greece's new finmin is a socialist moron. I have zero hope the new Greek government will be anything but hostile to crypto. The beauty is it doesn't matter in the slightest. The laws of economics cannot be repealed by legislative fiat.



1934. Post 10368073 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 05, 2015, 05:32:52 PM
...
any commodity in finite supply will have to gain value. Supply and demand, Baby...

How are you set for BTCeanies?  Don't miss the boat, freedom fighter!

If I could stash a million beany babies on a jump drive or email them, then maybe I'd be stocking up. But I doubt it because you would have to trust the manufacturer to limit the supply instead of merely just reading the source code that DEFINES a beany baby as one of only 21 million.



1935. Post 10368321 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: SnokkomBTC on February 05, 2015, 05:47:19 PM
^

Oh, another one that thinks that the population of Greece will adopt bitcoin. Haha!


Actually I think the majority of Greeks will be pimping out their daughters for cans of Spam, but a few will make out like bandits just like the Rooskies who bought up all those formerly state-owned businesses when shares were trading for pennies and then later became oligarchs.

Greece's new finmin is a socialist moron. I have zero hope the new Greek government will be anything but hostile to crypto. The beauty is it doesn't matter in the slightest. The laws of economics cannot be repealed by legislative fiat.
Yanis Varoufakis about financial system :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVxaTC7Qp44

I think he isn't so stupid..

Then you're stupid. He's claiming Greece has a solvency problem rather than a liquidity problem. No shit. A first year accounting student at a junior college could tell you that. But a doctor has to do more than just diagnose and his proposed prescription is poison.



1936. Post 10369645 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: damiano on February 05, 2015, 08:14:58 PM
20k shorts again... I think we are going to see the same squeeze as last time  Wink

where you see that info ?

http://bfxdata.com

I think you're gonna see a much bigger squeeze than that.

People are gonna be selling short the whole way up and those shorts will be squeezed too. The top will be ~$350 and there will be people getting margin calls who haven't even taken a position yet.



1937. Post 10370630 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

I think that there's a 80% chance we will retest $200, but there's no way I'm going to sell my coins on an only 80% chance I can buy them back. Yeah, it's prolly gonna go a little lower, so the fuck what? When the real pump starts it'll be too late to get on board because by the time you wrap your head around paying $230, it'll be $250 and by the time you think that's a reasonable price it'll be $280.

If you buy all the way down, you know that you'll get the best price on at least a few coins and you'll be fully loaded for the next rally. How many of you still had coins to sell when we hit $310 a couple weeks ago? I did, but not many. You can't dump coins unless you first get some coins to dump.

I don't wast time trying to top tick the peaks and bottom tick the rallies. I've lost out on too many opportunities that way. I'd rather give up some profits than stare at my screen like a stranded air traveler after he missed his flight when the market runs away from me.

and if you're short, keep shorting. It's the forced liquidations of the shorts that are going to really launch this next rally.



1938. Post 10370695 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: NotHatinJustTrollin on February 05, 2015, 10:21:12 PM
Remember all but a select few on this thread are retail playing with peanuts and leverage.

All it takes is a few consecutive 'short all the rallies!' attempts ending in margin calls and the attitude in here will change on a dime.



The only thing that can bring a solid sustainable uptrend (and not just a temporary short squeeze that will end in tears soon after anyway) is a constant influx of new money flowing in exchanges. Big demand.
As of now, there is none:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=934650.msg10358797#msg10358797

These short squeezes are >40% swings! You catch a couple of those a year and who gives a rat's ass if we ever get a new ATH? If you have the balls to short half way down to the next long squeeze as well, then you can bloody well quit your day job.



1939. Post 10372146 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 06, 2015, 01:17:59 AM
^

Oh, another one that thinks that the population of Greece will adopt bitcoin. Haha!


Actually I think the majority of Greeks will be pimping out their daughters for cans of Spam, but a few will make out like bandits just like the Rooskies who bought up all those formerly state-owned businesses when shares were trading for pennies and then later became oligarchs.

Greece's new finmin is a socialist moron. I have zero hope the new Greek government will be anything but hostile to crypto. The beauty is it doesn't matter in the slightest. The laws of economics cannot be repealed by legislative fiat.
Yanis Varoufakis about financial system :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVxaTC7Qp44

I think he isn't so stupid..

Then you're stupid. He's claiming Greece has a solvency problem rather than a liquidity problem. No shit. A first year accounting student at a junior college could tell you that. But a doctor has to do more than just diagnose and his proposed prescription is poison.


Anyhew, at the end of the video he makes a comment that is relevant for anyone who feels the need to defend Bitcoin vs fiat:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=iVxaTC7Qp44#t=5578

I hope the timestamp works, if not it's at 1:32:58.

Lemme save you the time. He says that money only has value because we believe it has value. I suppose that's true in a certain context but useless. Economics professors (he's a prof) only have value because we believe they have value also. What determines MARKET value for anything is supply and demand and what determines the value of something to an individual is marginal utility. Any Econ Prof worth his salt will tell you that the first week of Econ 101.



1940. Post 10373354 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.56h):

Quote from: damiano on February 06, 2015, 05:49:24 AM
We need to rach post 220 by today , to see a good week and no weekend dumpin.g

this is a bad assumption

Wether we break 220 or not there will be dumps.  We won't have a good week till this bear market ends.


You are putting the cart before the horse. How can the bear market end unless we first have some good weeks?

I agree there will be dumps. In fact, I'm counting on it. My greatest fear right now is that the Four Punch Raiders will start the pump leading up to the short squeeze before I run out of fiat.  



1941. Post 10381836 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: chopstick on February 07, 2015, 12:01:24 AM
BRAINTREE WAS MY FAVORITE UNTIL THEY SAID GO FUCK YOUR SELF.......     now I use authorize.net.

BrainTree is owned by Paypal.



1942. Post 10399299 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Most stolen coins have already been sold. Why do you think the price has gone down for over a year?



1943. Post 10406769 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: nanobrain on February 09, 2015, 07:33:23 AM
Remember kids...

the price doesn't matter,

bad news doesn't matter,

China doesn't matter.

Nothing matters in BTCland other than pictures of honey badgers and walls of text proclaiming the NWO.

Quote
Lemme save you the time. He says that money only has value because we believe it has value. I suppose that's true in a certain context but useless. Economics professors (he's a prof) only have value because we believe they have value also. What determines MARKET value for anything is supply and demand and what determines the value of something to an individual is marginal utility. Any Econ Prof worth his salt will tell you that the first week of Econ 101.
BillyJoeAllenRedneck firefighter who can't spell his own home state correctly

And of course even those with an education are wrong, wrong, wrong.

So, make sure to keep buying BTC with your credit card...if Cletus here says its good, why worry.

Yanis Varoufakis admits he's a Marxist, which means he's still clinging to the thoroughly discredited Labor Theory of Value when it was replaced by Marginal Utility by all non-Marxist economists about a century ago.

Certain people seem to put an exorbitant amount of effort into discrediting me. Why? I'm a nobody from nowhere. What is it that I am saying that is so dangerous that it requires these ad hominem attacks?

Beware the short squeeze boys and girls. It's coming.



1944. Post 10408126 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: bassclef on February 09, 2015, 06:38:28 PM

What many traders are missing now is the significance of the selling climax to $160, and the subsequent retest of that area. It is an enormous sign of strength for that many coins to have been transferred from weak hands to strong. I keep hearing "the downtrend is still intact!" Well, technically it is, but you'd better have a close look at that super high volume area that stopped the selling, or you're ignoring a big message the market is trying to tell you.

I don't think most of those coins went from weak to strong hands. They went from bulls getting margin calls to people who will flip them for a quick profit. I think there is a short squeeze coming, but that doesn't mean that I think the bear market is over.



1945. Post 10410325 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: bassclef on February 09, 2015, 08:08:53 PM

What many traders are missing now is the significance of the selling climax to $160, and the subsequent retest of that area. It is an enormous sign of strength for that many coins to have been transferred from weak hands to strong. I keep hearing "the downtrend is still intact!" Well, technically it is, but you'd better have a close look at that super high volume area that stopped the selling, or you're ignoring a big message the market is trying to tell you.

I don't think most of those coins went from weak to strong hands. They went from bulls getting margin calls to people who will flip them for a quick profit. I think there is a short squeeze coming, but that doesn't mean that I think the bear market is over.

Could be. But the chart doesn't lie. Bulls may have been margin called but that would have contributed to the selloff as their long liquidation would sell into market. Someone stepped in to stop the selling, cover their shorts and scoop up those coins, or else the market would have gone lower. Somebody was willing to buy in hopes to sell at a higher price later. Simple logic there.

Also important and related (and slightly off topic)... a bulls market's success is defined by how much selling (supply) is introduced into it. Conversely bear markets are successful because there is not enough buying to stop the selling and bring supply/demand into equilibrium. Now if the "Four Punch Raiders" are ultimately bullish, it makes sense to remove as much selling as possible so to not impede their pumping.

That's a huge "if". I have seen no evidence at all that they are bullish and actually a preponderance of the evidence suggests the opposite. The short squeeze I am expecting will be followed by a bounce and then another crash, if the pattern continues.



1946. Post 10410797 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: GaliX on February 10, 2015, 12:46:56 AM
7 days until the Euro crashes. Can't wait.

I'm assuming you are referring to the troika's demand that Greece submit a bail-out plan that they will not submit, prompting a Greek Gov't shutdown and a massive bank-run. 

If this plays out as expected, the Euro will lose value against the GBP, Swiss Franc and USD, but that doesn't necessarily mean it will crash.  What it will mean for bitcoin prices is far from certain. I don't see the price appreciating significantly in US Dollars until it becomes more widely utilized as a means to evade capital controls.



1947. Post 10410909 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 10, 2015, 01:13:52 AM
7 days until the Euro crashes. Can't wait.

I'm assuming you are referring to the troika's demand that Greece submit a bail-out plan that they will not submit, prompting a Greek Gov't shutdown and a massive bank-run. 

If this plays out as expected, the Euro will lose value against the GBP, Swiss Franc and USD, but that doesn't necessarily mean it will crash.  What it will mean for bitcoin prices is far from certain. I don't see the price appreciating significantly in US Dollars until it becomes more widely utilized as a means to evade capital controls.

Why isn't it being used this way yet??

Because capital controls haven't been implemented to any great degree yet.



1948. Post 10411374 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/03/us-eurozone-greece-cyprus-cash-idUSKBN0L71K020150203

"Authorities in Cyprus have confiscated 500,000 euros ($571,450) from a Greek businessman who tried to fly home with the cash after banks on the island refused to let him deposit it."

Ouch. Shoulda used Bitcoin.



1949. Post 10416942 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: itod on February 10, 2015, 07:33:52 AM
7 days until the Euro crashes. Can't wait.

I'm assuming you are referring to the troika's demand that Greece submit a bail-out plan that they will not submit, prompting a Greek Gov't shutdown and a massive bank-run. 

What non-senses are you people writing here? What Gov't shutdown? Bank-run?!? I have a feeling you know the situation as you are from Mars. There's 0 chance of Government shutdown, they have a brand new Gov't less then a month old which got elected with massive support announcing that it will do exactly what it is doing now. If Greece leaves the Euro-zone it will be better both for the Greece and the Euro.

Greece is out of money because the fools who got elected promised tax breaks and the fools who elected them stopped paying their taxes, hoping to get a better deal. So now it's not just the banks that are out of cash, but the government as well.



1950. Post 10417586 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: empowering on February 10, 2015, 02:20:00 PM

"Two years from now, spam will be solved." - Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, 2004


Eliminating spam seem to be to be an obvious use case for bitcoin. Have a mail application were it requires a few satoshis postage to send, but rather than the postage going to a post office, have the funds go to the recipient. Boom. Anyone sending bulk email pays for the privilege in anyone receiving bulk mail gets compensated for the hassle.




1951. Post 10419237 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Greece is a basket case. It's not all that complicated to understand if you have a solid grounding in economics and human nature. Tsipras and Varoufakis are lefties elected to erase the consequences of a country spending far more than they earned for a prolonged time period. They face an impossible task and they know it, so they are busy blaming others for their obvious impending failure to do what they promised to do. Breaking promises seems to be the Greek national pastime. No sane person would want to negotiate with these bad faith actors even if they weren't deluded socialists.

Greece will get kicked out of the EU. The EU is going to crumble because Greece is far from the only country in such economic dire straits. They are merely the first to default. These sovereign defaults will either take down many large European banks or usher in an era of massive currency devaluation. As nation after nation in the EU goes back to their own national currencies, Germany will find itself in a position of having nobody to sell it's goods to that has any money. Capital will flow in torrents into safe places, first Switzerland and England but later and in greater volume the USA.

The US will become concerned that the dollar is too strong and our exports are too expensive, so we will join in on the competitive currency debasement game. Treasuries will sell at a premium and the yield curve will invert before the flight to safety subsides.

This may not happen soon, but it will happen. Central banks, governments and the IMF are very good at kicking the can down the road, but the road is finite in length. The problem is in guessing how long they can keep up the charade that the world capital structure is not fatally misaligned. There is danger in being right too early.



1952. Post 10422003 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: VincentX on February 10, 2015, 09:33:09 PM
Greece is a basket case. It's not all that complicated to understand if you have a solid grounding in economics and human nature. Tsipras and Varoufakis are lefties elected to erase the consequences of a country spending far more than they earned for a prolonged time period. They face an impossible task and they know it, so they are busy blaming others for their obvious impending failure to do what they promised to do. Breaking promises seems to be the Greek national pastime. No sane person would want to negotiate with these bad faith actors even if they weren't deluded socialists.

This is essentially correct. Greece has had a negative trade balance for a very long time now, with no improvements on the horizon.

Greece will get kicked out of the EU. The EU is going to crumble because Greece is far from the only country in such economic dire straits. They are merely the first to default. These sovereign defaults will either take down many large European banks or usher in an era of massive currency devaluation. As nation after nation in the EU goes back to their own national currencies, Germany will find itself in a position of having nobody to sell it's goods to that has any money. Capital will flow in torrents into safe places, first Switzerland and England but later and in greater volume the USA.

This is completely wrong and demonstrates a clear lack of understanding of both European politics and European economics. Our institutions are complex and never straightforward. Even most Europeans don't understand them. You would do well to learn more about them before saying rediculous things like that.

Nevertheless: Greece will not be kicked out of the European Union. They will not leave the Eurozone or be kicked out of it. Leaving either the Eurozone or the Union would not absolve their debts. There will be more negotiations. A settlement will eventually be reached. The EU will continue to heavily subsidize Greece, which Greece is dependent on to survive. Their economy will take a turn for the worse but they'll still be better off than in any other situation.

As a whole, the EU is still running a trade surplus and is as such doing okay. Despite what you believe, Germany amounts to only 20% of the EU's economy and does not dominate European policy. This percentage is actually shrinking as eastern Europe developes. There is no massive currency devalutation nor is there one in the making. There isn't a single serious effort to reinstute national currencies, as not a single country would stand to benefit from it.

There is a whole lot of exaggeration when it comes to European economic and political instability (which is mostly just perception), and it seems you've fallen prey to it.

Euros just today are trading at 0.89/USD. That's a huge devaluation already and will be trading at par soon if this continues. As for defaults, that is effectively what happens when a country devalues it's currency (or re-institutes it's currency) and repays expensive money with cheap money. The U.S. Did it in 1971 when Nixon took us off the gold standard. It's a soft default ( a hard default is when they simply don't repay at all).

I understand that the European financial and political situation is enormously complex, but I don't need to know all the ins and outs to see that a monetary union with no fiscal (much less political) union is untenable given the very different incentives and motivations of the various players. How long will German Taxpayers subsidize the profligacy of the South?  If they take a haircut on Greek bonds, what's to stop the other peripheral countries from demanding the same? It's as if a family has a problem child and if they show tough love the kid will rebel and run away, but if they go soft, they other children will rebel also, (correctly) perceiving the preferential treatment as favoritism.

This latest demand for WWII war reparations is just icing on the cake. Hardly any Germans living bear any responsibility for the Nazis. If I was a German, I'd rather burn my money than give it to Greece. Now supposedly they are cozying up to Russia as well so we can ad "disloyal" to "lazy" and "dishonest" as descriptors of Greeks. Germany and the other creditor nations won't cave. They can't or their electorates will (rightly) boot them out of office.



1953. Post 10422097 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: julian071 on February 10, 2015, 10:44:00 PM


Also, to the original poster, instead of your diminutive attitude to 'the lefties', how about acknowledging that the 'righties' that created this mess in the first place are finally displaced from power. Finally there's a change of course for the better.

How do you figure that? "Righties" are usually recognized as Nationalists, most of whom never wanted an EU in the first place. For them, it was an issue of national sovereignty.



1954. Post 10422176 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: tempus on February 11, 2015, 01:57:31 AM


Germany is not that strong as many are thinking. "We" are a export-nation. Without a strong export the unemployment will rise hard. It's in german-interest to keep the south in the game because it could be the end of the Euro if south-states would leave. And that's why our government is in a weak position. They won't pay the demand for WW2 but they will make concessions. But, it's just playing time (delay the dynamic). It won't help long. It did not help in the past it won't stop the dynamic.

"strong" is a relative term. Compared to a bunch of bankrupt olive-munching crybabies, you are pretty strong. Ship your cars over here and we'll buy 'em if the price is right. Us Yankees love German cars. Seriously, you extended credit to poor countries so they would buy your stuff. That was not a good business decision, but don't compound it by throwing good money after bad. Varoufakis was correct when he said they were broke and can't pay you back.

The debt needs to be written off and the longer it takes to do so, the greater the damage. But Greece has to leave the EU. The other debtor countries will run all over you if you don't stand firm.



1955. Post 10422891 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: VincentX on February 11, 2015, 03:17:12 AM
You can not understand Europe if you do not understand its organisational complexities. The structure of contemporary Europe is unlike anything before and can not be analysed through 'traditional' models.

This is the Special Pleading Fallacy writ large. Models do not magically become more reflective of reality merely because they are more complex. The best models simplify the situation to the highest useful degree. The simple but unpleasant truth is that the only free lunch in the universe is increased efficiency and that is rarely aided by adding complexity. Complexity far more often is a way for bad actors to hide their parasitic behavior, and Europe has no shortage of bad actors.

There is no painless way to put your capital structure on a sound footing. People have to go bankrupt. People have to lose their jobs. It's the only way capital is transferred from bad mangers to good managers. That's why it's called a "correction" and if you postpone it, all you do is increase its intensity.



1956. Post 10422960 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: explorer on February 11, 2015, 04:02:22 AM
bids are very thin to 216  Huh



Quick fix:  Don't look back   Wink

I've been waiting almost a month now for my ~$205 coins and I'm starting to fear that they may not be on the menu.  I have thousands off the order books set aside for a drop should it come. I wonder how many others have also. I just don't see a short squeeze as likely until the pump and dumpers can credibly (credible to the naive) claim a double bottom.

Not that I mind much. I like to see a stable price. The longer it lasts, the better it is for Bitcoin.



1957. Post 10423674 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: VincentX on February 11, 2015, 05:07:47 AM
You judge Europe as if it's a singular behemothic superstate.

HUH?? I implied nothing of the sort. It's a multi-juristictional bureaucratic nightmare, But which country is in which organization is not really relevant to my point which is that a monetary union cannot succeed without fiscal and/or political union.

I used to think the U.S. Dollar was the worst possible form of currency, marrying fiat with fractional reserve lending, but you Europeans actually surpassed us. You combined the inflationary instability of fiat with the inflexibility of hard currency AND fractional lending. Wow, that's an accomplishment. I mean I know the Euro is nothing like a PM-backed currency, but to member states that need to adjust monetary policy differently, it might as well be.




1958. Post 10423729 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: podyx on February 11, 2015, 06:40:18 AM
A guy said the longer we stay stable at this price, the higher the chance that we will be going down. Because we're still in a downtrend.

I tend to think otherwise; if we stay stable at this price, then that is because the downtrend is losing strength which is obviously a bullish thing.

What do you guys think?

I think he's prolly right, but it's not gonna go down by much and it's not gonna go down for long. I mean who could possibly be holding onto BTC for maybe years only to dump it under $200 now? After all we've been through, who could get scared of a ~$20 drop now who hasn't already dumped?

The good thing about this market is it only takes 1/5th as many bulls to support a stable price as it did near the top.  



1959. Post 10423776 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: Bozuatle on February 11, 2015, 06:02:23 AM
Lets try to relate this discussion back to bitcoin somehow. At what point does bad government monetary policy "break the system?"

It's actually central bank policy and not government policy, but when there is apolitical loss of faith in the currency. That, my friends, is real hyperinflation. The other way is for deflation to reach the point where it triggers a run on the banking system.



1960. Post 10425278 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: 600watt on February 11, 2015, 10:20:37 AM
You judge Europe as if it's a singular behemothic superstate.

HUH?? I implied nothing of the sort. It's a multi-juristictional bureaucratic nightmare, But which country is in which organization is not really relevant to my point which is that a monetary union cannot succeed without fiscal and/or political union.

I used to think the U.S. Dollar was the worst possible form of currency, marrying fiat with fractional reserve lending, but you Europeans actually surpassed us. You combined the inflationary instability of fiat with the inflexibility of hard currency AND fractional lending. Wow, that's an accomplishment. I mean I know the Euro is nothing like a PM-backed currency, but to member states that need to adjust monetary policy differently, it might as well be.




and the winner is.... german export blitz.

to the german export industry the euro is not a nightmare but a wet dream come true. an economy with such export strength would sooner or later get a stronger currency = higher prices for their goods = less sales. germany is (ab)using the weak PIGS countries as class a weapons in the currency war.  it could not work better for them.

all this just to get a giant trade surplus.

Are you insane or just stupid? What good does it do to "sell" exports to people on credit when they default on the credit? How beneficial is it to give your stuff away? A trade surplus just means you're giving more stuff than you're getting. That's BAD not good. A weak currency helps your exporters but hurts you when you have to import the raw materials and energy. It's also terrible for capital formation (savings). There's a name for a condition where everybody works but nobody gets paid. It's called "slavery".



1961. Post 10430571 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: damiano on February 11, 2015, 08:10:03 PM
That was pretty weak

thanks for the coins @ 218


There are no traders dumping at this price. Any coins sold come from miners or more likely Bitpay vendors.

At the same time I'm not buying either, because I've already accumulated all the coins I want unless they get cheaper. Something's gotta give and all we can really do right now is wait.



1962. Post 10430670 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 11, 2015, 08:27:05 PM
what is your opinion on grexit? is it going to happen? will they let us leave eurozone? and if so, will this affect the price of bitcoin?

Nobody wants a grexit, not even Syriza. But something has to give soon, if Greece gets IMF on their side it might be difficult for the creditor nations to resist some kind of debt relief, but what form and what size is impossible to know right now.

Grexit will happen because there are three outcomes and grexit is the not the worst case scenario for either side. Possibilities:
1)Greek bank run with no bail-out leading to collapse of economy and government
2) Writedowns/write offs of Greek debt leading several other countries to re-negotiate austerity terms and massive losses to sovereign debt-holders.
3)  Grexit.

It's going to happen. The only real question is "when?"



1963. Post 10430835 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 11, 2015, 08:42:28 PM
what is your opinion on grexit? is it going to happen? will they let us leave eurozone? and if so, will this affect the price of bitcoin?

Nobody wants a grexit, not even Syriza. But something has to give soon, if Greece gets IMF on their side it might be difficult for the creditor nations to resist some kind of debt relief, but what form and what size is impossible to know right now.

Grexit will happen because there are three outcomes and grexit is the not the worst case scenario for either side. Possibilities:
1)Greek bank run with no bail-out leading to collapse of economy and government
2) Writedowns/write offs of Greek debt leading several other countries to re-negotiate austerity terms and massive losses to sovereign debt-holders.
3)  Grexit.

It's going to happen. The only real question is "when?"

You are assuming that the EU or Greece will choose the less bad option. Ballsy!

A more likely reason why there can be a grexit is simply because everyone fucks up and are forced to accept a grexit that nobody wants. That would be politics european style!

The fuck-up is not knowing the difference between what you want and a realistic expectation. Greece is out. The disaster for the EU would be if Greece leaves and is better off as a result. Then you're going to see a great unraveling of your whole experiment. What you should want and hope happens is that Greece suffers mightily. It's the only way your other deadbeat countries will stay in line.



1964. Post 10430972 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 11, 2015, 08:49:08 PM

the EU's new round of QE is a round of desperation. The problem seems to be that the greeks are publicly admitting they are bankrupt and they cannot pay their debt. If they continue the road they are on with austerities then the greek people will suffer for years and years and possibly even more years. If the greeks default then everyone holding their debt will lose. If the EU gives in to restructuring greek debt without austerities then other EU countries will want the same treatment. If the greek exit the EU then we will could start to see a stampede out of the EU by other countries facing the same problems. I think we are watching the start of the world economic crisis.


Finally someone around here gets it. There is no way out. The Banksters who run the world have painted themselves into a corner.



1965. Post 10431005 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

^^ Zorba's right. They lied to get in so now the Greeks must suffer or take all or Europe down with them.

Quote from: octaft on February 11, 2015, 09:00:35 PM
it's pretty loathsome behavior to hope for economic collapses -- with no regard for the lives it would destroy -- just so you can (maybe) make a few extra bucks off your BTC.

Either the Greeks suffer or all of Europe suffers. I prefer less suffering to more suffering so I don't see what's loathsome about that. You can quarantine the diseased or you can let the infection turn into a plague. If you don't have the stomach to make the tough choices then it's prolly good that you're in no position to do so.






1966. Post 10431132 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: octaft on February 11, 2015, 09:15:45 PM
it's pretty loathsome behavior to hope for economic collapses -- with no regard for the lives it would destroy -- just so you can (maybe) make a few extra bucks off your BTC.

Either the Greeks suffer or all of Europe suffers. I prefer less suffering to more suffering so I don't see what's loathsome about that.

Oh spare me. Of all of you discussing it, I am confident you are the one who would give the least fucks about who suffers or how much as long as you think it will help you make a few extra bucks.

As a firefighter, I look forward to going out on a fire call. It's not that I want to see people suffer, it's that in that situation I know I'm needed and that I can help. It's like that. If I make money trading, it's because I was in a position to provide liquidity when needed by the market, which is another way of saying needed by my fellow man.

I don't give a shit if you think I'm a bad guy or not. I have to live with myself, not you.



1967. Post 10439671 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Boring is good. It means stability, at least temporarily. Our function as day traders is to bring about exactly this outcome.

Go out and do something. We have accomplished what we needed to accomplish. Come back when the alarm on your smart phone apps tell you that we are needed again.



1968. Post 10441313 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: Torque on February 12, 2015, 07:41:03 PM
Boring is good. It means stability, at least temporarily. Our function as day traders is to bring about exactly this outcome.

Go out and do something. We have accomplished what we needed to accomplish. Come back when the alarm on your smart phone apps tell you that we are needed again.

Translation: "Aww shit, the whales are finally gone from the market.  No more money to be made, because we're lowly bottom feeders that can't move the market. Whatever will us poor troll daytards do with our daily lives now?"

I don't want to move the market. I want to keep it from moving or at least help slow it down. Successful day traders profit from removing volatility from the market and that makes bitcoin a more useful currency.



1969. Post 10441416 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: Moria843 on February 12, 2015, 07:52:25 PM
Where are all the predictions and YouTube videos for bitcoin going over $10,000?

How is that any more ridiculous than Apple having a market cap of $700 Billion? in order for one BTC to be worth $10,000, the market cap would only have to be $210B or less (depending on how many bitcoins have been mined when it happens), less than 1/3 of Apple Corp's current value.




1970. Post 10441458 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 12, 2015, 08:44:36 PM
Boring is good. It means stability, at least temporarily. Our function as day traders is to bring about exactly this outcome.

Go out and do something. We have accomplished what we needed to accomplish. Come back when the alarm on your smart phone apps tell you that we are needed again.

Translation: "Aww shit, the whales are finally gone from the market.  No more money to be made, because we're lowly bottom feeders that can't move the market. Whatever will us poor troll daytards do with our daily lives now?"

I don't want to move the market. I want to keep it from moving or at least help slow it down. Successful day traders profit from removing volatility from the market and that makes bitcoin a more useful currency.



i'm not a very good day trader then because i am well known for causing massive tidal waves of wave after wave that makes adam guerbuez's roller coaster look like nothing .

It's impossible to successfully day trade without removing volatility from the market, so perhaps you should move your perspective out a couple orders of magnitude to see that's what you are doing.



1971. Post 10442700 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 12, 2015, 09:04:27 PM
Where are all the predictions and YouTube videos for bitcoin going over $10,000?
How is that any more ridiculous than Apple having a market cap of $700 Billion? in order for one BTC to be worth $10,000, the market cap would only have to be $210B or less (depending on how many bitcoins have been mined when it happens), less than 1/3 of Apple Corp's current value.

Well, when you buy some Apple stock, you become owner of a slice of a huge company, that makes 70'000 USD of profit every second, by manufacturing and selling more than 10 million high-quality computers and smatrphones per month, that people literally give a kidney for.   Whereas, when you buy a bitcoin....

There is no rational reason why an Apple phone or computer is substantially more desirable than one of it's many competitors. It's simply a preference and preferences change. The desire to own bitcoins (which can be looked at as shares in the Bitcoin network) is also a preference. The demand for Apple products may go down, particularly if they fail to keep innovating at a pace and in a way their customers expect. The demand for bitcoins may go up if innovation in the space makes them more useful.

$700B puts Apple stock at a ludicrous price/earnings ratio reminiscent of the Dotcom bubble before the 2000 crash. There may be no objective way to value bitcoin, but there are objective ways of valuing stocks and by most objective measures, Apple is way overpriced.



1972. Post 10442807 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):





19,000 BTC swaps isn't enough shorts to make it worth the squeeze...yet. Wait until it's ~ 25,000 before tightening the noose.



1973. Post 10442965 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 13, 2015, 12:09:02 AM




19,000 BTC swaps isn't enough shorts to make it worth the squeeze...yet. Wait until it's ~ 25,000 before tightening the noose.

Any chance swaps will decrease or do you think it's pretty certain we will reach 25,000?

It's possible but unlikely net shorts will go down by much. You might see some profit taking if there is a substantial drop but they will open right back up when price rebounds.



1974. Post 10445718 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: samsonn25 on February 13, 2015, 01:14:52 AM
Where are all the predictions and YouTube videos for bitcoin going over $10,000?
How is that any more ridiculous than Apple having a market cap of $700 Billion? in order for one BTC to be worth $10,000, the market cap would only have to be $210B or less (depending on how many bitcoins have been mined when it happens), less than 1/3 of Apple Corp's current value.

Well, when you buy some Apple stock, you become owner of a slice of a huge company, that makes 70'000 USD of profit every second, by manufacturing and selling more than 10 million high-quality computers and smatrphones per month, that people literally give a kidney for.   Whereas, when you buy a bitcoin....

There is no rational reason why an Apple phone or computer is substantially more desirable than one of it's many competitors. It's simply a preference and preferences change. The desire to own bitcoins (which can be looked at as shares in the Bitcoin network) is also a preference. The demand for Apple products may go down, particularly if they fail to keep innovating at a pace and in a way their customers expect. The demand for bitcoins may go up if innovation in the space makes them more useful.

$700B puts Apple stock at a ludicrous price/earnings ratio reminiscent of the Dotcom bubble before the 2000 crash. There may be no objective way to value bitcoin, but there are objective ways of valuing stocks and by most objective measures, Apple is way overpriced.

Apple stock  pays a dividend

And the pe ratio is only 16.8 not bad for a company  still growing

What the hell makes you think it's still growing? STEVE JOBS IS DEAD. HE IS NO MORE. HE HAS SHUFFLED OFF HIS MORTLE COIL. HE HAS CEASED TO BE.



1975. Post 10445764 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 13, 2015, 09:03:24 AM
Quote
I'm starting to think it's either a new resonance of freedom of thought and innovation, or another few hundred years of the dark ages.

I fully expect to see one or the other outcome within my lifetime. (Next 50 years)

schmadz nails it ... these are the stakes, no less, I concur.

As do I, but I ain't selling shit until I see $300. I was hoping for more cheap coins I may yet get them.



1976. Post 10445785 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on February 13, 2015, 09:27:02 AM
short squeeze to 255 then consolidate.

edit: please, thank you.

bullshit. If we're going to $255 then we're going to $350, but I think we might be going down first. Time will tell.



1977. Post 10445839 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on February 13, 2015, 09:21:22 AM
Their focus on and uncompromising attitude to human/technology interaction makes their products more usable and powerful tools for more people than Linux, Windows and Android. Android have been making great strides, but it still isn't as intuitive as Iphones. I use Android because I don't mind and I got an Android phone for free from someone who was fed up and bought an Iphone. And my every day computer runs Fedora, but when a relative asks I advice them to get an Iphone and a Mac. I used to have to use Christmas and Easter to fix my relative's computers, now that everyone has Apple products(except my Grandma, and it's amazing what a Pre-WW2 woman can clog up Win 7 with) I don't have to. As a computer nerd it can be difficult to see the significance of this, but this kind of approach needs to be applied to those parts of the Bitcoin eco-system that's aimed at ordinary mainstream users.

"Every minute" - P.T. Barnum



Sigh.

Indeed, but we can easily build an idiot interface on top of Bitcoin. OSX is just linux with a few tweeks. These are the cheap coins people and if you don't buy them, I will. I just feel a little guilty holding so many of them. I'm in a position to sell the whole way up or to buy more if we go down again because I was PATIENT. The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent ONLY if you use leverage. Put yourself in a position to buy and hold and you put yourself in a position to profit.



1978. Post 10445908 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: silverfuture on February 13, 2015, 06:53:17 AM
Is coinbase leading this spike?

I'm not sure who lead, but Houdini err huobi seems to be following through

I wouldn't think they had enough volume to lead but they seem to have the highest price. Why would there be a premium there?

CoinBase used Bitstamp for liquidity, at least they used to. If us Yanks are buying, expect both Stamp and CB to show it. There are billionaires that are waiting for the optimal time. Sometime we will say "goodbye" to <$300 coins forever. I want more cheap coins and I hope we get them, but I can live with what I already hold because I was not greedy. Can you say the same? If the bear market is over, are you in a position to enjoy that?



1979. Post 10446088 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: AirFlame on February 13, 2015, 09:52:37 AM
Is coinbase leading this spike?

I'm not sure who lead, but Houdini err huobi seems to be following through

I wouldn't think they had enough volume to lead but they seem to have the highest price. Why would there be a premium there?

CoinBase used Bitstamp for liquidity, at least they used to. If us Yanks are buying, expect both Stamp and CB to show it. There are billionaires that are waiting for the optimal time. Sometime we will say "goodbye" to <$300 coins forever. I want more cheap coins and I hope we get them, but I can live with what I already hold because I was not greedy. Can you say the same? If the bear market is over, are you in a position to enjoy that?


I am in position to recover looses when i bought at $800 and $600 and $400 Wink

Stick to your guns and you will profit, my friend. There are people who were smart or lucky enough to have a much better ROI, but I've been in this game since 2011 and I regret selling much more often than I regret buying at suboptimal times. There's 7+ billion people on the planet and only 21 million coins. The only question is whether we will profit or if we will profit extremely well.



1980. Post 10446495 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: dannyspk on February 13, 2015, 10:43:24 AM
short squeeze to 255 then consolidate.

edit: please, thank you.

bullshit. If we're going to $255 then we're going to $350, but I think we might be going down first. Time will tell.

Fake breakout?

It's a real breakout, but we don't know yet if it has legs. Just like that little bump to $$248 on Feb 3rd, there's money to be made trading these little swings, but I don't have the balls to do it for fear I'll miss out on the short squeeze to $350 that's coming. The CB pump and dump to $315 was a no-brainer. I trade the no-brainers and leave the smaller swings to people smarter/luckier/more ballsy than me.

As I said weeks ago, I buy a little every day until the short squeeze or for three months, whichever happens first. Gotmilk was right. MACD is a trailing indicator. It is not useless but its utility is limited. There is no crystal ball. The closest thing we have is the Four Punch Pattern, market momentum and the order book.



1981. Post 10446549 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on February 13, 2015, 10:58:33 AM
unofficial poll:

I have 100k USD laying around

should I buy?


I have about 9 grand laying around also and I'm asking myself the same question. I bought a little and I'll buy a little more tomorrow regardless if price goes up or down. Save the panic buys for after big dumps, even if you end up buying at a higher price than now. We are liquidity providers, either of fiat or coins. Our trading partners are not enemies. Greed will not make you money. Patience will.



1982. Post 10446563 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: dannyspk on February 13, 2015, 11:07:43 AM
Strange hunch that this is going back in the 220s. Got out at $235.

Thanks for your coins, Brother  Wink I feel better knowing that you'll be there providing support for the floor should it be needed.



1983. Post 10446626 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: dannyspk on February 13, 2015, 11:17:38 AM
short squeeze to 255 then consolidate.

edit: please, thank you.

bullshit. If we're going to $255 then we're going to $350, but I think we might be going down first. Time will tell.

Fake breakout?

It's a real breakout, but we don't know yet if it has legs. Just like that little bump to $$248 on Feb 3rd, there's money to be made trading these little swings, but I don't have the balls to do it for fear I'll miss out on the short squeeze to $350 that's coming. The CB pump and dump to $315 was a no-brainer. I trade the no-brainers and leave the smaller swings to people smarter/luckier/more ballsy than me.

As I said weeks ago, I buy a little every day until the short squeeze or for three months, whichever happens first. Gotmilk was right. MACD is a trailing indicator. It is not useless but its utility is limited. There is no crystal ball. The closest thing we have is the Four Punch Pattern, market momentum and the order book.

Oh, there's definitely money to be made if you don't let your emotions guide you. Everyone was expecting a move outside the triangle so here it is. This mini rally could have been orchestrated before the actual breakout. Yet there are no shorts available at a decent rate.

That's strange considering that there are only ~ 20,000 BTC swaps on BFX. Paradoxically, the high interest paid for swaps might drive the price higher.  Lenders make much less than successful traders, but it's less risky. I'm paying a reasonable rate for my margin long, which is nice because it may take some time to pay off. I guess the fiat lenders are more bearish than the BTC lenders. That's a new development.



1984. Post 10447139 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on February 13, 2015, 11:46:03 AM


what rpice did you sell at? Or did you just deposit that?



bought @ 2-6 USD  sold @ around 650 USD on the way down   Embarrassed Smiley Roll Eyes

BOOM!  I think it's foolish not to buy at least a little now. Fiat on an exchange is good for nothing except buying coins. I hope you have some in cold storage cuz if that's all the BTC you have left, You're notgonna catch up to me unless there's a truly catastrophic crash.

Congrats, BTW. I wish I had sold more in the $600s but not as much as I wish I had bought more during the crashes.



1985. Post 10447182 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: NotHatinJustTrollin on February 13, 2015, 11:44:21 AM
bulltrap

LOL the only way I could get out of being trapped in paper profits now is if I actualize them. I think I'll just let it ride.



1986. Post 10447225 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: yefi on February 13, 2015, 12:32:05 PM
Apple stock  pays a dividend

And the pe ratio is only 16.8 not bad for a company  still growing

Currently, dividends are unsustainable as they are dipping into their cash reserves. Corporate profits need to grow in order for them to be robust. Thing is, when you're already the biggest company in the world, how do you grow by say a factor of ten?

So Jobs is pushing up daisies and AAPL faces real competition in every single market they're in. Purely in terms of limiting the potential downside, Bitcoin is a much safer bet.

oh yeah, and $238 BITCHES! w00t!

Acts 2:38 "Repent..."



1987. Post 10447541 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 13, 2015, 01:04:55 PM
...
oh yeah, and $238 BITCHES! w00t!

And you didn't sell Sad  Another opportunity wasted...

Quote
Acts 2:38 "Repent..."

King Lear: Act 5, Scene 3: "No, no, no, no! Come, let's away to prison:"

That would be clever if we were trading near $53.



1988. Post 10447761 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: dannyspk on February 13, 2015, 01:25:11 PM
$240 at Bitstamp..

Stamp and CB are leading. China is following like a lost puppy. This smells less like the FPR short squeeze than a Yankee Doodle rally. I think they buyer(s) may be jumping the gun a bit, but let's see how it plays out. He'll need a heluva lot of dough to bust the pattern.



1989. Post 10456720 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: mrkavasaki on February 13, 2015, 09:40:50 PM
Is this another dead cat bounce Huh

well, no.



1990. Post 10456799 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

CCMF!!  You're nucking futs if you think you'll get a single one of my coins for less than $300. I should have bought even more, but the cash I have left will hold me over for months if need be. I'll use it to pay bills of to by MOAR if it goes back down.

I can't believe the swap rate on my margin long is almost nothing. pennies. Christmas in February. Suck it, bears.



1991. Post 10461169 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Has anyone interviewed Professor Bitcorn lately about his predictions? Becaus I'd really like some $15 coins and I'd like to know where to get them.



1992. Post 10461512 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: greenlion on February 14, 2015, 07:29:35 PM
Has anyone interviewed Professor Bitcorn lately about his predictions? Becaus I'd really like some $15 coins and I'd like to know where to get them.

Ask Stolfi instead.

He says BTC is doomed long term(no date so we will never the wrong), and posts here(has this thread in his watchlist)

It doesn't work like that, he would just come up with some passive-aggressive way to change the subject to the fact that you're asking, then pose some seemingly innocuous question to the floor, to which he responds with some trolling that's already locked and loaded.

Trolfi already admitted that there was no way he could be persuaded to change his mind about bitcoin which is essentially saying his view isn't rational, even if it later turns out to be correct.



1993. Post 10461550 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 14, 2015, 07:52:23 PM
Has anyone interviewed Professor Bitcorn lately about his predictions? Becaus I'd really like some $15 coins and I'd like to know where to get them.

Ask Stolfi instead.

He says BTC is doomed long term(no date so we will never the wrong), and posts here(has this thread in his watchlist)

It doesn't work like that, he would just come up with some passive-aggressive way to change the subject to the fact that you're asking, then pose some seemingly innocuous question to the floor, to which he responds with some trolling that's already locked and loaded.

Trolfi already admitted that there was no way he could be persuaded to change his mind about bitcoin which is essentially saying his view isn't rational, even if it later turns out to be correct.

He's admittedly not a speculator. But his critique is important. He's a very bright guy

His intelligence isn't irrelevant. His critique is based on false premises and a shocking ignorance of even basic economics. He doesn't know Adam Smith from Will Smith. He doesn't know F.A. Hayek from Selma Hayek.



1994. Post 10461684 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 14, 2015, 08:12:48 PM
Has anyone interviewed Professor Bitcorn lately about his predictions? Becaus I'd really like some $15 coins and I'd like to know where to get them.

Ask Stolfi instead.

He says BTC is doomed long term(no date so we will never the wrong), and posts here(has this thread in his watchlist)

It doesn't work like that, he would just come up with some passive-aggressive way to change the subject to the fact that you're asking, then pose some seemingly innocuous question to the floor, to which he responds with some trolling that's already locked and loaded.

Trolfi already admitted that there was no way he could be persuaded to change his mind about bitcoin which is essentially saying his view isn't rational, even if it later turns out to be correct.

He's admittedly not a speculator. But his critique is important. He's a very bright guy

His intelligence isn't irrelevant. His critique is based on false premises and a shocking ignorance of even basic economics. He doesn't know Adam Smith from Will Smith. He doesn't know F.A. Hayek from Selma Hayek.

To clarify: I didn't mean this as some kind of appeal to authority. I have a lazy way with words sometimes. I meant that he has made some good points. I kind of think of him as reptilia in reverse

It's Risto (R) Pietila. He's not a lizard.



1995. Post 10461758 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: gentlemand on February 14, 2015, 08:18:45 PM

It's Risto (R) Pietila. He's not a lizard.


He is now. He's just been initiated on his secret island.

LOL that. It's like we have our own Buiderberg group.

BTW, I don't quite understand the criticism that most bitcoin is in the hands of a few large holders. Most Microsoft Stock is in the hands of founders and a few top employees but nobody seems to mind about that.

Haterz gonna hate hate hate...



1996. Post 10461903 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: NotHatinJustTrollin on February 14, 2015, 08:31:16 PM

It's Risto (R) Pietila. He's not a lizard.


He is now. He's just been initiated on his secret island.

LOL that. It's like we have our own Buiderberg group.

BTW, I don't quite understand the criticism that most bitcoin is in the hands of a few large holders. Most Microsoft Stock is in the hands of founders and a few top employees but nobody seems to mind about that.

Haterz gonna hate hate hate...
Distribution is far from being one of the main issues with bitcoin.

By the way, a currency ≠ a stock.
Also, the top bitcoin whales are anonymous, not really the same.

Well, there's that Chinese guy with > 100,000. There are the Winklvi, and several other known large holders. Satoshi is anonymous, but so are most of the top holders of U.S. Dollars. A currency isn't a stock, but if you wanna compare apples to apples, the case is even stronger.




1997. Post 10462131 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):


Quote from: TrollHankerous on February 14, 2015, 06:54:14 PM
Bitcoin not going up yet,nowheres but down, folks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KThlYHfIVa8





1998. Post 10462245 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on February 14, 2015, 09:22:07 PM
Is this little pump over the last few days based on any good news?

Or have weak hands finally been shaken out and more people are beginning to HODL?

We buy because we anticipate selling at a small profit soon or a large profit eventually. This is the short squeeze of the FPR pattern.



1999. Post 10462306 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: Xiaoxiao on February 14, 2015, 09:37:43 PM
The sell orders are starting to stack up on bitstamp and bitfinex.... and it seems to be hitting a brick wall @ 260.

The trend is about to move down again and follow course.

The only thing that's going down is your mom. Thanks for your coins  Cheesy



2000. Post 10462496 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 14, 2015, 09:54:38 PM
yes, time to dump those coins into billyoje face.


LOL please DO! I want MOAR!!!!



2001. Post 10462590 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 14, 2015, 10:21:47 PM
yes, time to dump those coins into billyoje face.


LOL please DO! I want MOAR!!!!


you are a poor bitch, you will not last long.

How do you figure? I got ~$8k in the bank, a sixty coin margin long with a base price of $226, liquidation price under $65, ~15 coins at CB and circle and coins in cold storage. I got a tradable balance of over $33 grand. How can I possibly get wiped out? You gonna dump to $64?

I'm in the catbird seat, so just admit I out-traded you this time. Nobody likes a poor loser.




2002. Post 10462642 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on February 14, 2015, 10:40:02 PM
^The bottom volume in USD is the same as the $475 megabulltrap.

Yes, this is not a definitive end to the bear market, but there is a likely short squeeze to ~$350 coming before the next retest of $170.



2003. Post 10462684 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 14, 2015, 10:45:45 PM
yes, time to dump those coins into billyoje face.


LOL please DO! I want MOAR!!!!


you are a poor bitch, you will not last long.

How do you figure? I got ~$8k in the bank, a sixty coin margin long with a base price of $226, liquidation price under $65, ~15 coins at CB and circle and coins in cold storage. I got a tradable balance of over $33 grand. How can I possibly get wiped out? You gonna dump to $64?

I'm in the catbird seat, so just admit I out-traded you this time. Nobody likes a poor loser.




I really dont give a jack shit about your book, this fucker is going down from here, you can call for MOAR coins as much as you want. unless you put a bid for 5000 coins .

I don't have to. The Four Punch Raiders have ample fiat. So you are predicting $260 resistance will not be breached? You'd better add to your short then.



2004. Post 10462755 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 14, 2015, 10:52:43 PM
What was the date again when bitcoin is expected to replace the dollar and send the US government into bankruptcy?

Counting unfunded liabilities, the US Government already has a negative net worth of a few score trillion. They would already be bankrupt without the FED's participation in the bond market, so nobody will be able to blame bitcoin for that eventual insolvency.

Of course by then, most Brazillians will be living in mud huts, reverting to cannibalism and pimping out their daughters for for cans of spam after eating all the University Professors.



2005. Post 10462938 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 14, 2015, 11:12:10 PM



it's not that you dont have to, it's just that you can't because you are not rich enough. big difference.

btw, I like your book talk and hope of some mythical creatures doing things for your liking.

I dont do leverage but thanks anyway.

Uh, thanks. I guess. Obviously I'm not rich enough and never implied otherwise. Not even close. Maybe you are confusing me with Risto or someone else. When I say I can move markets, it just means I know how to strategically place bids and orders in a way that pushes it in the desired direction, but with my small trading stash I can only do it on very low volume days and times and to a very limited amount.




2006. Post 10463021 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: oda.krell on February 14, 2015, 11:39:20 PM
Of course by then, most Brazillians will be living in mud huts, reverting to cannibalism and pimping out their daughters for for cans of spam after eating all the University Professors.

Harsh.

He might not be exactly a preeminent economist, but I heard some of his 1980s contributions to computational geometry are not exactly irrelevant.

What is it about mathematicians that, towards the end of their productive period, they venture into the "softer" fields, and, well, generally flame out there?

Hubris, probably. Something our little crypto crowd knows a thing or two about ^_^

Smart people are attracted to central planning, because obviously smart people make better central planners than dumb people, only it's more accurate to say they make less bad central planners because, due to the economic calculation problem, central planning doesn't work. at all. no matter who is doing the planning. Some people just can't accept that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem



2007. Post 10463083 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 14, 2015, 11:58:52 PM
What is it about mathematicians that, towards the end of their productive period, they venture into the "softer" fields, and, well, generally flame out there?

Indeed.  Newton and Pascal come to mind.  But there are exceptions - Euler and Gauss, for example, if I am not mistaken.

Well, what would you do after your productive period is over?  Wink

When race horses get old, they put them out to stud. That would probably suit me. You, OTOH have prolly been so softened by tenure that you may be incapable of doing anything but bloviating.



2008. Post 10463751 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: octaft on February 15, 2015, 02:10:57 AM

100% agree. Also, smart people think that after the "revolution" they will give the orders. They won't, they will be "shot in the head" by dumb but agressive people...

Those dumb aggressive people would be controlled by smart aggressive people.

It might depend on what you mean by "dumb." Most world leaders including dictators and autocrats have an I.Q. level little higher than two standards of deviation above the mean. People smarter than that apparently can't relate to normal people well enough to exploit them.



2009. Post 10463772 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: NotHatinJustTrollin on February 15, 2015, 02:19:17 AM
LMAO
Read that shit:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2vwjb4/someone_needs_to_do_a_new_bitcoin_ad_campaign/

"Ladies if your man doesnt have some bitcoin then he cant handle anything and has no danger sex appeal. He isnt edgy and there is nothing interesting about him.
Someone needs to do a new bitcoin ad campaign promoting these ideas."

Bitcoin created a monster. A cult made of batshit crazy nutjobs (r/bitcoiners are a fine example). Sometimes it's hilarious, then you think about it and you realize it's pretty sad.

It may be sad, but you trollin' sad people on Valentine's Day is even sadder.



2010. Post 10463795 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Well $260 seems to be holding. I think I'm gonna go out and get my Mardi Gras on. Getting drunk, passing out and waking up richer is working so far.



2011. Post 10464123 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

I thought I woke up pregnant once, but it turns out that I had just won a boudin-eating contest. Either way I was sticky, broke and confused.



2012. Post 10464221 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: camolist on February 15, 2015, 03:48:54 AM
5th of Jameson in for the night

logged into bitfinex

taking votes on if I submit a margin short or long wall

SHORT. WE don't have enough shorts yet to squeeze to $350. Shorts actually went DOWN today.



2013. Post 10464241 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 15, 2015, 04:01:25 AM
I think $260ish will be the top for now and we'll head back down on a big dump. Maybe that will be it for the bear?

If you really think that, you should be shorting.  You'll stand to make a ton of profit and prove all these stupid  perma bulls wrong.

You know what? Everyone moans and complains about the trolls, but once the price moves up like this, their absence makes this thread a little dull...

It doesn't make it dull, it makes it readable. When the price is falling, every page is 90% "This user is currently ignored".

Seems to me some of them made some good points on the way down..

I wouldn't know. Anyone using the term "Bulltard" is ignored.

It was like a year long beargasm. Hard to believe we're out of the woods just like that

Maybe cuz we're not. A fifty dollar rally off the $100 CB pump and dump is not a trend reversal. We're just punishing people for selling coins they don't own now.



2014. Post 10464996 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Less hodling more shroting. I need moar coins. Well, don't "need" exactly, but it would be nice.

edit: I said MOAR SHROTING. Saturday night with bank holidays and people are still buying!

There has to be at least a little retracement before the next leg up. I mean, c'mon people.



2015. Post 10465485 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Y'know, I've been in this game since 2011 and I've seen a lot of tops and this just doesn't look like one.
But go ahead and SHROT if you disagree.

This is a love attack
I know it went out but it's back
And just like any fad
It retracts before impact
~Smashmouth





2016. Post 10465779 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 15, 2015, 09:35:30 AM
i think they keep shorting ...

I know, isn't it beautiful?  This squeeze is gonna be epic.



2017. Post 10465815 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on February 15, 2015, 09:42:24 AM
i think they keep shorting ...

Well... it could be that we hit the point where is smart to take the profit (speaking for longs). Little 10-15$ correction would be healthy right now.

Oh no. There's nothing healthy about it, but it's gonna happen anyway. The pump WILL NOT STOP until the shorts get margin calls, and it will cascade on itself until it goes stupid high. and then WE short until the longs get squeezed too.



2018. Post 10465822 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: subtleknife on February 15, 2015, 09:43:53 AM
Holy shit $266? So $300 is very possible right?

I'm betting over half a year's salary on it.



2019. Post 10465887 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on February 15, 2015, 09:51:51 AM
i think they keep shorting ...

Well... it could be that we hit the point where is smart to take the profit (speaking for longs). Little 10-15$ correction would be healthy right now.

Oh no. There's nothing healthy about it, but it's gonna happen anyway. The pump WILL NOT STOP until the shorts get margin calls, and it will cascade on itself until it goes stupid high. and then WE short until the longs get squeezed too.

I closed my long, but not going to short it at this point.

Thanks for your coins!



2020. Post 10465915 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 15, 2015, 09:55:16 AM
Yeez, Why are swaps going up like this? Someone hogging them?

Battle lines are being drawn. Shorts mostly just want to get out with a smaller loss but some of them are doubling down on stupid. It's those beautiful bastards I'm counting on.



2021. Post 10465939 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: Bernard Lerring on February 15, 2015, 10:03:27 AM
Where have all the trolls gone?

Is this small climb, coupled with missing trolls, indicative that they were trolling all along to try and suppress price and now that they've loaded up on coin it's time to CCMF?

Pretty much, yup. That's what I'm thinking anyway.



2022. Post 10466047 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 15, 2015, 10:10:57 AM
Where have all the trolls gone?

Is this small climb, coupled with missing trolls, indicative that they were trolling all along to try and suppress price and now that they've loaded up on coin it's time to CCMF?

Pretty much, yup. That's what I'm thinking anyway.

If lambie sends this mofo to unicorn heaven, I might forgive him.

The butthurt is sweet, sweet nectar.



2023. Post 10466181 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Looks like the bear counterattack is already running out of steam. time to wait.



2024. Post 10466265 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: JamesBrown on February 15, 2015, 10:52:54 AM
Looks like the bear counterattack is already running out of steam. time to wait.

272 here we come! Volume is coming back in also

Yeah, but it needs to go just a little lower first. I need to add to my position.



2025. Post 10466318 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on February 15, 2015, 11:00:23 AM
Looks like the bear counterattack is already running out of steam. time to wait.

Told ya  Wink 252$ should hold.

Yikes!  At least now we have a fight! I was thinking this was too easy.



2026. Post 10466328 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: podyx on February 15, 2015, 11:01:41 AM
I was planning to sell at 268.

What a surprise that it only reached 267.92

I got that beat. I missed the top of the last short squeeze to $475 by a fraction of a penny.



2027. Post 10466431 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: neuronics on February 15, 2015, 11:13:43 AM
bter.com offline

Ahhhh. Wind-fall for those who missed the first stop on the train.



2028. Post 10466445 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on February 15, 2015, 11:00:23 AM
Looks like the bear counterattack is already running out of steam. time to wait.

Told ya  Wink 252$ should hold.

So far you're right, but did you have to cut it so damn close?



2029. Post 10466460 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: 600watt on February 15, 2015, 11:19:50 AM
wow, epic battle. it will go north of 350 within 12 days, and down another 100 after that peak (if we are through with the downtrend and further down if the downtrend is still intact.) so... the next 24 days are critical  Wink

I know that's toungue-in-cheek, but I don't think you're too far off!



2030. Post 10466498 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

BTC swaps are actually DOWN. Bears are helping halt the slide by covering!

This is a crazy game.



2031. Post 10466512 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 15, 2015, 11:23:55 AM
but of course.

this is just the beginning of a correction that will take days.

We'll see. I kinda hope you're right. I have a few more thousand I wanted to plow in anyway.



2032. Post 10478231 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

I would normally have expected more of a drop over a banking holiday weekend, but I guess I got caught up in the irrational exuberance. Anyway I am adding to my positions a little cheaper now, so it's really a good thing.

I still think we have a real short squeeze coming and I'm just gonna keep buying until we do, but it may take a little longer. The pattern DOES get flatter every cycle.



2033. Post 10482507 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: damiano on February 16, 2015, 06:54:12 PM
Current market conditions are a bit alarming to me.

A lot of shorts have been closed, but there is plenty now available to short. 

Using that logic: The employment market is alarming. A lot of people have been hired, but that means more people could lose their jobs.



2034. Post 10482952 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: damiano on February 16, 2015, 08:29:34 PM
Current market conditions are a bit alarming to me.

A lot of shorts have been closed, but there is plenty now available to short.  

Using that logic: The employment market is alarming. A lot of people have been hired, but that means more people could lose their jobs.

Probably means that there is less chance of a short squeeze at these low depths.  

And it's more likely that they'll re-load their short positions on any signs of strength.

I don't think there is any chance of a short squeeze around these levels at all.  If anything I do agree with what you mentioned about reloading.  If we break up into the 240's-250 thats when we will start to see some action.  

If anything I think longs are being slightly squeezed atm..Some more than others.  Quite a bit of longs opened up at 250+ just 2 days ago, but there have been a few riding this down

The crash down to $166 was caused by longs getting cascading margin calls. I strongly doubt it would happen again so soon. Yes, some of us longs are being slightly squeezed, but in my case it would have to be a squeeze well into double digits to force a margin call and even then I have the ability to post extra margin.

I'm not one of those longs, still showing a paper profit, but I easily could be soon. I just don't think there are enough coins for sale at this level to keep us here for long. As always, time will tell.



2035. Post 10483163 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: silverfuture on February 16, 2015, 09:03:32 PM
So...bitcoin is fungible? Great!

That's what I was thinking too, being fungible is one of the desirable qualities of money. Compare bitcoin to other money systems or networks, not plush toys or hockey cards. You have to be really reaching to make any type of comparison and anyone who does reveals their current level of understanding.

"Fungible" means different things in different contexts. Let's say you were considering using potatoes as currency. Not all potatoes are the same size, shape, ripeness, etc. some might have diseases or bugs.

In that context, bitcoins are almost perfectly fungible. Now of course what you meant was that they can be traced on the blockchain all the way back to their origin so they can become tainted and you are obviously right, but a currency that could be more easily laundered would have a much more difficult time being tolerated by the monetary authorities.



2036. Post 10485761 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):



"It seems that much of the iPhone snobbery is akin to overpaying for a small portion of mediocre food in a trendy restaurant. It's all about conspicuous consumption. Look at me. I can afford to pay $600 for something that's not worth $100."

DING DING DING! We have a winner. 



2037. Post 10487778 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Listen, you candy-ass bitches-  YOU CAN'T CATCH US. ALL YOU CAN DO IS PUT IN A BID AND HOPE YOU  GET LUCKY. WE GOT YER COINS, ASS CLOWNS. SUCK IT



2038. Post 10492812 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

It's noteworthy that although the frequency of security issues on exchanges has not subsided substantially, the amount of damage they cause has decreased considerably. The money lost on Stamp was orders of magnitude smaller than Gox and the exchange itself ate the cost. This Canadian exchange is also protecting its customers.

Bitcoin is growing up. Historians will see Mark Krapeles as the dishonest incompetent fucknut that he is and when prediction markets start turning into assassination markets, the first test target ought to be him.



2039. Post 10493098 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

So I have this small pile of cash and I'm afraid I may be a fiat bag holder. If you understand that every USD debt is effectively a short on the dollar, the market is saying that dollars are a shitty investment.



2040. Post 10493190 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 17, 2015, 07:33:42 PM
So I have this small pile of cash and I'm afraid I may be a fiat bag holder. If you understand that every USD debt is effectively a short on the dollar, the market is saying that dollars are a shitty investment.

Ask me what I thought was a shitty investment on January 14,2015.

You sister's Certificate of Virginity?



2041. Post 10493335 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 17, 2015, 07:43:52 PM
So I have this small pile of cash and I'm afraid I may be a fiat bag holder. If you understand that every USD debt is effectively a short on the dollar, the market is saying that dollars are a shitty investment.

Ask me what I thought was a shitty investment on January 14,2015.

You sister's Certificate of Virginity?

How did you know? Have you....?

The base for the 2013 bubble was ~$100. It's looking more and more like the base for the great 2015 bubble will be ~$220 meaning the top will come in around $2,500-$4,000.   There's almost countless factors involved, so this is a very rough estimate, but waiting for a discount of more than 10% from here may well be futile.



2042. Post 10493523 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Hfertig on February 17, 2015, 08:08:03 PM
i guess I have to give a big "thank you" to all of you who bought my coins in this bulltrap. did not get everything filled but I dont want to be greedy😜😂

You're quite welcome. I'll sell them back to you @ $400.



2043. Post 10493734 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Hfertig on February 17, 2015, 08:18:41 PM
nah... buying them back when you panic sell @ 120...

Won't happen. I'll panic buy maybe. You do realize I can keep buying indefinitely, right? My poor market timing just means that I trade a certain amount of fiat for bitcoin on a regular basis. The lower it goes, the MOAR I buy.



2044. Post 10493835 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 17, 2015, 08:18:20 PM
So I have this small pile of cash and I'm afraid I may be a fiat bag holder. If you understand that every USD debt is effectively a short on the dollar, the market is saying that dollars are a shitty investment.

Ask me what I thought was a shitty investment on January 14,2015.

You sister's Certificate of Virginity?

How did you know? Have you....?

The base for the 2013 bubble was ~$100. It's looking more and more like the base for the great 2015 bubble will be ~$220 meaning the top will come in around $2,500-$4,000.   There's almost countless factors involved, so this is a very rough estimate, but waiting for a discount of more than 10% from here may well be futile.

I would certainly agree that a fairly solid bottom is forming at $220, but it tends to look a lot more wobbly when you're about to risk your own money. I'm not sure if that part about the bubble is accurate. To get that kind of money into Bitcoin we'll need some serious adoption by users as well, not just traders. And if that landslide is triggered who knows where we will end up. But I don't see much sign of that kind of adoption yet.

Fiat is not your money. You may have worked for it, but it was ultimately created out of thin air and it is only used because of legal tender laws meaning it's only used because we have guns in our faces. Well two can play at this game. I can just take out a bunch of perfectly legal loans using their artificially low interest rates and pay only the interest. That's easy to do just on the profits and if someday I run out of profits I'll just default. Only I doubt that'll happen because my debt to income ratio is still orders of magnitude better than the US Government's. A deflationary depression will mean that they'll have a lot more and bigger deadbeats than me to pursue and a hyperinflationary collapse will play right into my hands.



2045. Post 10493940 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Hfertig on February 17, 2015, 08:46:45 PM
nah... buying them back when you panic sell @ 120...

Won't happen. I'll panic buy maybe. You do realize I can keep buying indefinitely, right? My poor market timing just means that I trade a certain amount of fiat for bitcoin on a regular basis. The lower it goes, the MOAR I buy.

...and the MOAR you lose. Somehow I feel sorry for you, but I guess you don't want to hear that anyway.

How do you figure? My average buy in is around $85 dollars. I've been at this game since 2011. Best investment I've ever made.



2046. Post 10494160 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

The trolls are out in force today. They are trying to soften up the market so they can buy in cheaper. I hope it works.

The reality is that I will always have more coins than you clowns no matter what the price because I am willing to pay more for them. You may have a better ROI. Good for you. It's not a zero sum game. Every short has to cover at some point. I can hold until the brothel your mothers work at start accepting bitcoin.



2047. Post 10494208 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 17, 2015, 09:06:44 PM
So I have this small pile of cash and I'm afraid I may be a fiat bag holder. If you understand that every USD debt is effectively a short on the dollar, the market is saying that dollars are a shitty investment.

Ask me what I thought was a shitty investment on January 14,2015.

You sister's Certificate of Virginity?

How did you know? Have you....?

The base for the 2013 bubble was ~$100. It's looking more and more like the base for the great 2015 bubble will be ~$220 meaning the top will come in around $2,500-$4,000.   There's almost countless factors involved, so this is a very rough estimate, but waiting for a discount of more than 10% from here may well be futile.

I would certainly agree that a fairly solid bottom is forming at $220, but it tends to look a lot more wobbly when you're about to risk your own money. I'm not sure if that part about the bubble is accurate. To get that kind of money into Bitcoin we'll need some serious adoption by users as well, not just traders. And if that landslide is triggered who knows where we will end up. But I don't see much sign of that kind of adoption yet.

Fiat is not your money. You may have worked for it, but it was ultimately created out of thin air and it is only used because of legal tender laws meaning it's only used because we have guns in our faces. Well two can play at this game. I can just take out a bunch of perfectly legal loans using their artificially low interest rates and pay only the interest. That's easy to do just on the profits and if someday I run out of profits I'll just default. Only I doubt that'll happen because my debt to income ratio is still orders of magnitude better than the US Government's. A deflationary depression will mean that they'll have a lot more and bigger deadbeats than me to pursue and a hyperinflationary collapse will play right into my hands.



Then why are you a fiat bag holder?

I try to get rid of my fiat, but then somebody sends me another zero interest credit card in the mail and I find I don't need to spend it. Meanwhile the paychecks keep rolling in. It's a constant struggle.



2048. Post 10494654 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Andre# on February 17, 2015, 10:05:52 PM

bitcoins are both made out of thin are and in reality are more thinner than paper.

"artificial commodity" + "artificial scarcity"

Both fiat and bitcoin are artificial. Both are scarce. The difference is that bitcoin's artificial scarcity is determined by a transparent algorithm, while fiat's artificial scarcity is determined by opaque politics. I know what I prefer. Do you?

Here we have a logic troll unscrupulously using facts and reason to inform people and lure them into doing something sensible. He has no respect for the way we do things here.



2049. Post 10494984 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 17, 2015, 10:35:46 PM

bitcoins are both made out of thin are and in reality are more thinner than paper.

"artificial commodity" + "artificial scarcity"

Both fiat and bitcoin are artificial. Both are scarce. The difference is that bitcoin's artificial scarcity is determined by a transparent algorithm, while fiat's artificial scarcity is determined by opaque politics. I know what I prefer. Do you?

false dilemma.

it doesnt matter who and how is issuing them, unless you have a lot of them.

"thin are"? "more thinner"?? You seem to have the same understanding of English as you do of economics.



2050. Post 10495364 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 17, 2015, 10:59:47 PM

bitcoins are both made out of thin are and in reality are more thinner than paper.

"artificial commodity" + "artificial scarcity"

Both fiat and bitcoin are artificial. Both are scarce. The difference is that bitcoin's artificial scarcity is determined by a transparent algorithm, while fiat's artificial scarcity is determined by opaque politics. I know what I prefer. Do you?

false dilemma.

it doesnt matter who and how is issuing them, unless you have a lot of them.

"thin are"? "more thinner"?? You seem to have the same understanding of English as you do of economics.


english is my third language and I am drunk .

now, unless I am speaking to sorosh, goat or mircea gtfo you poor, english centric troll with your ad hominem attack.

Your critique is so stale it only merits an ad hominem attack. The reason I never learned whatever tribal grunts is your native tongue is because I don't have to. English speakers rule the planet. And I'm drunk too so back at ya, you foreign fucking foreigner fuck.



2051. Post 10495445 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 17, 2015, 11:53:55 PM
...
english is my third language and I am drunk .

now, unless I am speaking to sorosh, goat or mircea gtfo you poor, english centric troll with your ad hominem attack.

You're critique is ...

*Your
He's drunk & not a native speaker.  You're illiterate.

Doh! Maybe I'm drunkerer.



2052. Post 10495505 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: octaft on February 17, 2015, 11:57:42 PM
You're critique is so stale it only merits an ad hominem attack. The reason I never learned whatever tribal grunts is your native tongue is because I don't have to. English speakers rule the planet. And I'm drunk too so back at ya, you foreign fucking foreigner fuck.

My god you are fucking stupid.

Hint: if you're going to talk down to people about their grammar (a non-native speaker, no less, you fucking stupid fuck), make sure to learn the fucking difference between "you're" and "your." That is not to say that's the only thing that makes me think you're fucking stupid -- you offer plenty of proof like 90% of the time you open your big, fucking stupid mouth.

Stupid motherfucker.

I guess fucking your mom technically does make me a motherfucker, but thank you for improving the level of discourse. I fixed it. Are you happy now? Oh wait, your..you'are...ah yer still waiting on sub $200 coins. No wonder y....yous...y'all are so grumpy. Gotcher coinz, Bitchez!



2053. Post 10495630 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: NotHatinJustTrollin on February 18, 2015, 12:04:31 AM
Something big coming April 15th
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=959464.0

Thoughts?
Brought to you by some dude that suggested people to buy at $800-$1200:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=358474.0


I stand by that prediction. I wasn't wrong per se so much as early...by a couple years. Maybe three.

You seem to be putting in a lot of research to discredit me. Do you really think I'm influential enough to merit the effort? I feel kind of flattered.



2054. Post 10495733 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: NotHatinJustTrollin on February 18, 2015, 12:23:31 AM
Something big coming April 15th
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=959464.0

Thoughts?
Brought to you by some dude that suggested people to buy at $800-$1200:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=358474.0


I stand by that prediction. I wasn't wrong per se so much as early...by a couple years. Maybe three.

You seem to be putting in a lot of research to discredit me. Do you really think I'm influential enough to merit the effort? I feel kind of flattered.
Dude, did you even open that link? It's not even about you.

You sure you're just drunk and not high as a kite?

Clearly not drunk enough. It's Fat Tuesday and I have to clear all the beer out of my fridge before Lent starts. It's a little weird considering I'm not even Catholic, but when in Rome...



2055. Post 10496336 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 18, 2015, 02:01:51 AM
the sweat from the fiat bag holders is so palpable it's almost dripping out the bottom of my computer ...
this slow grind higher must be torture sitting on interest and red short positions, worrying about a violent breakout movement that stops you out altogether?

You know it brother. I sure would hate to be holding a giant bag of cash right now. Sure dodged that bullet

Damn! I got a bag of fiat. Think I'm gonna buy a little moar.

EDIT: done. I feel better, but I'm gonna keep some powder dry. Bitcoin is behaving and it makes me nervous the way quiet kids do. 



2056. Post 10496435 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 18, 2015, 02:23:48 AM
Get your fiat cannons ready, gentlemen.

Now that virtex closed down, I got no where to fire the fiat cannons,  Cry


Move. It's too cold up there anyway.



2057. Post 10511362 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: HarmonLi on February 19, 2015, 01:07:05 PM
Market doesn't react at all to the news of Germany not accepting Greece's request for new money? Even the EUR/USD didn't seem do budge a lot. I really wonder whether an exit of Grecce out of the Euro zone would influence BTC at all.

This just happened. I don't think the market has had time to digest the news yet. It may be priced in to some degree as Schaubel or whatever the German Finance Minister's name is warned repeatedly that they would reject loan extentions w/o austerity.



2058. Post 10511676 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on February 19, 2015, 01:57:52 PM
Bitcoin all over CNN right now.
"But it's not backed by anything, it's not like it's backed by gold like the dollar (USD)"
Ummmm since when has the dollar been backed by gold?

Wasn't it the early 70s? Before most of us were born?

The U.S. left the pseudo-gold standard known as "the Bretton Woods Accord" in 1971. The dollar was made non-redeemable in gold to U.S. citizens in the 1930s by President F.D. Roosevelt.




2059. Post 10512137 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

CNN is promoting the Morgan Spurlock feature that airs tonight. The "Supersize Me" guy who tried to live on McDonald's food is attempting to live on bitcoin.

I think this is a good thing. There is no such thing as bad publicity. The worst crime is not being infamous. The worst crime is being irrelevant.



2060. Post 10512167 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: podyx on February 19, 2015, 02:53:48 PM
Shorts going up are bullish or bearish?

Bullish. Big money and people like me following them are waiting for ~25K shorts before we crank up the big pumps for a squeeze to $350.



2061. Post 10512287 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 19, 2015, 03:04:59 PM
Shorts going up are bullish or bearish?

Bullish. Big money and people like me following them are waiting for ~25K shorts before we crank up the big pumps for a squeeze to $350.

Please no! I'm scared Cry


It doesn't matter if you are scared. It matters if you are leveraged.



2062. Post 10512697 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: empowering on February 19, 2015, 03:28:02 PM


The problem with the game of chicken is that it's entirely possible for both sides to lose.



2063. Post 10513528 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

good sized green candle puttin' the pressure on those 3k of new BTC swaps! 



2064. Post 10513732 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Can-kicking produces diminishing returns, but there is no other politically viable option. This is not unlike Bears getting trapped in an underwater short position. Cover now and the price rises. Wait and the price rises. by postponing the pain, you guarantee that you will have to unwind at the worst possible time...



2065. Post 10513842 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: damiano on February 19, 2015, 05:29:58 PM
This pause in the movement is interesting

it takes time for a train to build up momentum.



2066. Post 10513949 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: damiano on February 19, 2015, 05:40:38 PM
those new opened short positions are just a hedge for more than 1 mil of usd swaps opened in the last few days.

now, let's give this pump a chance, we can all have a better exit point.

there is a lot of time till the auction.

Seems stupid to open them up where they did.  Now they are underwater

They ARE underwater. They weren't opened @ $260 but in the low $230s. Time is not on their side. Let's hope they double down on stupid so we can really launch this squeeze.



2067. Post 10513977 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 19, 2015, 05:44:36 PM
those new opened short positions are just a hedge for more than 1 mil of usd swaps opened in the last few days.

now, let's give this pump a chance, we can all have a better exit point.

there is a lot of time till the auction.

Seems stupid to open them up where they did.  Now they are underwater


5 k of btc < 1 mil of USD

besides, it could have started a panic selling because of the auction.

In Bitcoin time, that auction is ages from now. It won't come nearly soon enough to save bears from a margin call. those 15 MM in margin longs are distributed far wider. Thousands of positions 10% long vs. hundreds of positions 50% short.



2068. Post 10514025 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 19, 2015, 05:51:04 PM
those new opened short positions are just a hedge for more than 1 mil of usd swaps opened in the last few days.

now, let's give this pump a chance, we can all have a better exit point.

there is a lot of time till the auction.

Seems stupid to open them up where they did.  Now they are underwater


5 k of btc < 1 mil of USD

besides, it could have started a panic selling because of the auction.

In Bitcoin time, that auction is ages from now. It won't come nearly soon enough to save bears from a margin call.


I remember you! you are that stupid redneck talking shit all the time!

boy, I wish I could dump on you soon.

But ya can't cuz ya don't have enough coins, do you, Pardner Wink



2069. Post 10514289 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 19, 2015, 05:54:49 PM
those new opened short positions are just a hedge for more than 1 mil of usd swaps opened in the last few days.

now, let's give this pump a chance, we can all have a better exit point.

there is a lot of time till the auction.

Seems stupid to open them up where they did.  Now they are underwater


5 k of btc < 1 mil of USD

besides, it could have started a panic selling because of the auction.

In Bitcoin time, that auction is ages from now. It won't come nearly soon enough to save bears from a margin call.


I remember you! you are that stupid redneck talking shit all the time!

boy, I wish I could dump on you soon.

But ya can't cuz ya don't have enough coins, do you, Pardner Wink


I do, but you are not that stupid to place your bids now. but I wish you were!

I threw in an extra hundred bucks just for shits and giggles.



2070. Post 10514886 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: YourMother on February 19, 2015, 06:24:55 PM
B-b-b-but 'bitcoin is dead' / 'sub 100' / 'single digit coins' .

Beartards.

^This pig really impressed me by coming up with these messages after a two dollar pump. Also, who´s the idiot that keeps buying before a 50000 btc auction ? Is there any logic behind this ?

Mind bending...

LOL You mean the idiot who keeps buying before the CNN program on bitcoin?
The butthurt is almost as much fun as the $$$$$



2071. Post 10515218 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: yefi on February 19, 2015, 07:20:02 PM
I heard people say the same thing when Lehman/sub-prime mortgage fiasco was happening,   those same people still cannot figure out (7-8 years later) why they are working more, earning less, why their house is worth less, why their chicken and shopping costs more.

Greece does not operate in a vacuum, plus, make no mistake, Portugal, Spain, France, Italy are all looking very closely at what is happening, they also do not operate in a vacuum.

Even if there is a last minute compromise reached this week, even then, the future of Greece in the Euro is looking shaky. Elections coming up in other southern European countries soon too.

If you are in a position to be isolated and immune from the global financial situation, then bully for you, but while the world will not cave in on itself, neither will a grexit be an isolated event that effects only the Greeks.  

Yep, good post. It destroys the irrevocability of currency union. The ramifications of this will be disastrous. Greece may not be the bomb, but it will be the fuse for sure.

The problem is that Greece got in the currency Union under false pretenses. They should forfeit all national assets. They should nationalize everything they can steal and give it all to the banksters. Let Greece be the first open vassal state of the Banks. Every western country is anyway so we might as well be honest about it. Let democracy officially die first where it was born. Appoint a bankster governor, preferably some Greek sell-out. Auction off the Parthenon on eBay. I got my eye on a little Greek island I want to buy.



2072. Post 10515283 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 19, 2015, 07:35:15 PM
I guess the coast is clear.  I was expecting heaving dumping to take place once we landed over 240 and once the support strengthened.



whew that was a close one wasn't it ?? did you hear that everybody ?? coast is clear ......

the $240 coast IS clear. The $250 coast? Well, that remains to be seen.



2073. Post 10515309 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on February 19, 2015, 07:41:10 PM
Forgive my ignorance but what does Greece have to do with the price of BTC?

Remember the banking crisis in Cypress? There is a possibility of a massive pump if a critical mass of Greeks use Bitcoin to evade/avoid capital controls, should capital controls be implemented.



2074. Post 10515391 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: LewiesMan on February 19, 2015, 07:44:58 PM
Forgive my ignorance but what does Greece have to do with the price of BTC?

Remember the banking crisis in Cypress? There is a possibility of a massive pump if a critical mass of Greeks use Bitcoin to evade/avoid capital controls, should capital controls be implemented.

That's what people said with the Ruble crash but nope Sad

There are some differences. Russia faced sanctions, which were externally-imposed capital controls and they were/are limited. It's also an economy many orders of magnitude larger and is controled by an autocratic strongman. Even so, Russia is even now experimenting with an alternative to the SWIFT system, so I'm not writing them off just yet.



2075. Post 10515682 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: LewiesMan on February 19, 2015, 08:07:12 PM

Fun read but how is it discussion related?

If people start to think their pensions, savings or bank deposits aren't safe, they will obviously try to find a more secure way to hold their wealth. Bitcoin is resistant to government confiscation if properly secured.



2076. Post 10515731 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

BFX swaps @ 19,885. Only borrowed coins are being sold. They will have to be repurchased.

I love it when a plan comes together.



2077. Post 10515851 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 19, 2015, 08:26:40 PM

Well, he hasn't confiscated them, just nationalized them.   Which may be the first step to siphoning money out of them, but also may protect them from madoffitis or lehmannbrodosis. 

(In my 20s I contributed for several years to a private pension fund that eventually goxxed.  A few years ago the neocon governor of the State of São Paulo privatized the state workers' pension fund, which among other things means less transparency and accountability, and less obligation for the state in case the fund sinks, and put his cronies at the helm.  So, frankly, I do not feel much about Morales's move, either way.)

My God your statist blinders are thick. He doesn't even have to be intentionally stealing. All he has to do is convince himself that he's borrowing the funds short term, then for an extended term and then something else becomes more important than replenishing them. It's like giving a loan to your drug-addicted cousin. You're almost certain that you'll never see that money again.



2078. Post 10515878 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 19, 2015, 08:29:11 PM
BFX swaps @ 19,885. Only borrowed coins are being sold. They will have to be repurchased.

I love it when a plan comes together.


I threw in an extra hundred bucks just for shits and giggles.



great plan!

btw thanks for an extra hundred bucks!

lol market timing was never my strong suit. At least with such a small amount I can afford to ride it out. I may yet have something to crow about. Just threw in another hundred.



2079. Post 10515943 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 19, 2015, 08:40:38 PM
...It's like giving a loan to your drug-addicted cousin...

With Bitcoin, you simply become your drug-addicted cousin.

Well yeah, but I don't have one hand out and the other pointing a gun at your face, telling you it's for you're own good.



2080. Post 10516001 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: empowering on February 19, 2015, 08:48:01 PM
I don't believe Cyprus had much direct effect on the BTC price. The idea that the Cyprus crisis was causing a price boost was mentioned in the news in the US and Europe, which generated some hype. Some Europeans bought bitcoins, but I don't think much of the buying actually came from Cyprus.

Bitcoin was new and exciting back then. I'm not convinced another financial crisis now would have a similar effect.

Anyone who thinks the average Cypriot read up on BTC and then bought in within the space of a few days is tripping their tits off. It was inspiration for existing believers to buy more and that's about it.

A lot of russian oligarchs had their money stashed away there. Serious amounts. And they know what BTC is.


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/moscows-mafia-finds-an-island-in-the-sun-cyprus-is-awash-with-dubious-dollars-from-russia-robert-fisk-reports-from-limassol-on-the-visitors-with-private-jets-bulging-suitcases-and-a-reluctance-to-answer-questions-1381056.html

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/15/us-cyprus-outflows-insight-idUSBRE94E0BN20130515

http://www.bbc.com/news/business-21831943

These people WOULD use BTC to GTFO.

only if they could actually get to the money... and in which case.... what would they need BTC for.

Private jets have weight limits and pallets of hundred dollar bills are heavy compared to jump drives.



2081. Post 10516156 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: empowering on February 19, 2015, 09:01:01 PM


right ..... but that is a different discussion all together, there are logistics involved in moving large amounts of hot money no matter how you dice it. Though chances are if you have private jets worth of notes in cyprus stored in a luxury apartment, then you can probably do with not moving it for a month in the case capital controls are in place and all the banks shut and your usual friendly bank manager cannot help you out or you cannot deposit and transfer the cash to an exchange if going down the BTC route.

I was talking about how buying BTC is not an option for people that are already in a country that capital controls have been placed (and maybe expecting a haircut or a massive devaluation) as you would not be able to access those funds to buy BTC with.

If you've already lost access, then you're S.O.L., but you could use localbitcoins and pay a premium if you can pull your money out but not take it across the border.  An sd card is also less tempting for thieves and robbers (private sector or public) than a suitcase full of cash.



2082. Post 10516187 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

19,999 BTC swaps vs. 16MM in USD. There's prolly gonna be a big break-out one way or another.



2083. Post 10516285 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 19, 2015, 09:07:19 PM

lol market timing was never my strong suit. At least with such a small amount I can afford to ride it out. I may yet have something to crow about. Just threw in another hundred.



your not saying Huh? i noticed u been chasing the pumps lately . don't feel bad my timing isn't that great either all the time. i missed a couple good moves when i didn't trust my instincts.. it's the other times though when i am in the zone on top of my game .. not gonna throw in another hundred here though .

I haven't really been chasing the pumps so much as not running from them. I've been buying about 1BTC/Day for the last couple of weeks and I've only bought $200 worth today so I'm below average.



2084. Post 10516464 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: empowering on February 19, 2015, 09:20:54 PM
Would there actually be a market for a Bitcoin whale to travel to an economically stricken country with a trezor wallet packed with 100s+ BTC and sell them locally?

Anyone think this sort of thing happens? Serious question. Just musing on the idea.

Interesting idea.

Risky (as in risky to your short/long term health)

You couldn't just parachute in and set up shop. There's all sorts of local knowledge that would be necessary to operate. It would take a certain type of person to be successful at that trade, but I'm sure it's possible.



2085. Post 10516632 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Bernard Lerring on February 19, 2015, 09:42:55 PM
Does anyone expect a pre-weekend mini pump tomorrow, like what happened last Friday?

I've got a small amount of BTC I want to use to buy alts and don't want to exchange today if we get a little bit of action in the next 24 hours.

Chances of happening? Crystal ball? Cheesy

Well, I'm loaded pretty full long so I expect it to crash  Roll Eyes Seriously, I think a retracement is likely before a substantial advance, but I don't know by how much, so I'm just gonna hold and add to my position if we do get a dip. There seems to be more upside potential than down, but this is Bitcoin and anything can happen.



2086. Post 10516695 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 19, 2015, 09:48:27 PM
great plan!

btw thanks for an extra hundred bucks!

I thought you don't trade?


no, I said I dont margin trade and use obscure exchanges like bitfinex.

and yes, I sold a bunch of bitcoins in 266 range.

Judging by your behavior, I'm guessing you didn't buy them all back yet. Makes me feel good to know you're down there for support and also that you'll miss the train if support isn't needed. Clearly you fail at hodling.



2087. Post 10516720 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on February 19, 2015, 09:57:56 PM
i'm still a noob here but our current situation kind of looks like a buildup of buying pressure at the trend line. as if it's about to explode. maybe?

You can't always go by the order book.

It takes minutes for bitcoins to be deposited to exchanges. Fiat deposits take days.

People with fiat on exchanges tend to place bids rather than just leaving it dormant in their accounts.

Those with coins will usually leave them in paper wallets until they're almost ready to trade.

Also, BFX gives you the option of hiding your order and I can't see any game-theory reason why you WOULDN'T.



2088. Post 10516776 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 19, 2015, 10:04:05 PM
great plan!

btw thanks for an extra hundred bucks!

I thought you don't trade?


no, I said I dont margin trade and use obscure exchanges like bitfinex.

and yes, I sold a bunch of bitcoins in 266 range.

Judging by your behavior, I'm guessing you didn't buy them all back yet. Makes me feel good to know you're down there for support and also that you'll miss the train if support isn't needed. Clearly you fail at hodling.


no, I am just being rude to some stupid redneck guy trying to talk his book and shit!

and yes, I will dump some more soon!




Please do. I'll buy them.



2089. Post 10516849 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 19, 2015, 10:09:19 PM
great plan!

btw thanks for an extra hundred bucks!

I thought you don't trade?


no, I said I dont margin trade and use obscure exchanges like bitfinex.

and yes, I sold a bunch of bitcoins in 266 range.

Judging by your behavior, I'm guessing you didn't buy them all back yet. Makes me feel good to know you're down there for support and also that you'll miss the train if support isn't needed. Clearly you fail at hodling.


no, I am just being rude to some stupid redneck guy trying to talk his book and shit!

and yes, I will dump some more soon!




Please do. I'll buy them.


but you are a poor bastard, you dont have enough money...

I'll buy four thousand dollar's worth of them then.



2090. Post 10516892 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 19, 2015, 10:10:23 PM
Does anyone expect a pre-weekend mini pump tomorrow, like what happened last Friday?

I've got a small amount of BTC I want to use to buy alts and don't want to exchange today if we get a little bit of action in the next 24 hours.

Chances of happening? Crystal ball? Cheesy

Well, I'm loaded pretty full long so I expect it to crash  Roll Eyes Seriously, I think a retracement is likely before a substantial advance, but I don't know by how much, so I'm just gonna hold and add to my position if we do get a dip. There seems to be more upside potential than down, but this is Bitcoin and anything can happen.


hmmm...ok everyone did you hear that ?? this is the 'fully loaded bitcoin but it has more upside potential from here crash' !! is everybody ready Huh i am getting my 'fully loaded "anything can happen" bitcoin crash' suit on right now. we can't take any chances when we have a clear of a sign as billyjoe being fully loaded.. we are just waiting on the 'chinese miner' dump to set the shorts going again...............

I said "pretty full." I have some dry powder. 



2091. Post 10517039 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Averaged out over the last month, we've been going up ~ 0.3%/day. I think that's actually sustainable. With the exception of the CB pump and dump, it looks pretty healthy.



2092. Post 10517361 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: thompete on February 19, 2015, 11:08:22 PM
WHat do you think of the imapact on the price once the ATH comes out ?

IF we approach the ATH, it will act as resistance until breached and then act as support. That's a long way off assuming it happens at all, so don't worry about it.



2093. Post 10517612 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Looks like the bulls are prepping for an assault on the $245 wall. I think there might be some hidden resistance, so I'm gonna wait for the bears to soften up a little.



2094. Post 10517690 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Specular on February 19, 2015, 11:43:52 PM
Forgive my ignorance but what does Greece have to do with the price of BTC?
Nothing.

Until I unveil my brilliant plan.

Airdrop Bitcoin ATMs that only accept Drachmas and Euros all over Greece!

You heard it here first folks. (jk)

You do know ATMs can get stolen and busted open, right? You gonna air drop security guards too?



2095. Post 10517732 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: damiano on February 19, 2015, 11:51:32 PM
Looks like the bulls are prepping for an assault on the $245 wall. I think there might be some hidden resistance, so I'm gonna wait for the bears to soften up a little.


Not much left on btc swaps...

I'm not worried about short-sellers. In fact, I'm counting on them. What I'm worried about is bulls taking profits too soon and letting them off the hook.



2096. Post 10519202 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: bad trader on February 20, 2015, 12:46:12 AM
Can someone explain this shit to me. The price looks stable. Then someone buys ~600 BTC on Bitstamp. Then OKCoin crashes. Why?
maybe just coincidence?
Looking at it closer, the Bitstamp buy may have been just a panic buy because of the OKCoin upswing and perhaps didn't affect it too much.

I have a gut feeling with nothing to back it up. Before I explain it, I should preface by saying that my gut feelings are often wrong and this should not be construed as trading advice or as an indication of my book, but here goes:

I think someone big missed the train. A whale or whales swimming deep in the order book were gonna catch the bottom of the CB dump, but only got a piece of it, not the control they were expecting. Now they could short on margin and tried to catch up, but they know how dangerous that would be, to risk a margin call. So they got desperate. Crashed a half dozen exchanges that they had previously compromised. Price fell, but not nearly enough to regain control. Now their only hope is jawboning the market lower, hacking/cracking where they can and FUD. They are waiting for the minnows to screw up, dump and give the market back to them.

It's just a gut feeling. 



2097. Post 10519260 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: empowering on February 20, 2015, 02:56:36 AM
Got to be said.......Varoufakis... has got more front than Brighton beach.

Balls the size of watermelons.

(and he really does look and sound like a bond villain)

I know economics. From my vantage point, he's not a bond villain or Jesus or Inspector Cluseau. He's an idealist as only an academic can afford to be (wink, wink, Jorge). It's this idealism that will be his undoing and unless he discovers his inner sociopath, he will get the blame for the Grexit.  He is full of intellectual hubris but he underestimates how truly viscous and evil his opposition is.

I hope I'm wrong, but I think he's fighting monsters and is ill-equipped to do so. Of course if by some miracle he triumphs, he will almost certainly become a monster himself. The world doesn't need another socialist martyr. I hope he doesn't become one.



2098. Post 10519291 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 20, 2015, 01:06:03 AM
Looks like the bulls are prepping for an assault on the $245 wall. I think there might be some hidden resistance, so I'm gonna wait for the bears to soften up a little.


Not much left on btc swaps...

I'm not worried about short-sellers. In fact, I'm counting on them. What I'm worried about is bulls taking profits too soon and letting them off the hook.



ok well this is the weaksauce of the gimpyest 'short squeeze' ever ..... get ready to get smash dumped on .

Patience, Grasshopper. I'm not hoping for a short squeeze nor do I want to see one, although I'm going to capitalize should it occur. Bitcoin doesn't need that kind of volatility. It doesn't need another bubble. It needs stability and sustainable growth. We are the decentral bankers. We're not here to get rich quick. We're here to eat volatility and give the world a real alternative to chains.



2099. Post 10519371 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: camolist on February 20, 2015, 04:47:04 AM
jameson was involved in the first 132.79585631 purchase

no alcohol involved in the second purchase

go big or go home



Geez, the USD swap rate is getting up there. Slow your roll, Camo. That's a perfectly reasonable purchase, but we need to consolidate in this range for a while before the assault on $250. If we get much higher, take some profit and get back in 4 or 5 dollars lower.



2100. Post 10519514 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

It's Lent in the Cajun swamp so no booze for me. I'm watching Atlas Shrugged part III on DVD and smoking a e-cig.  I'll have to save the hookers and blow for the next ATH.



2101. Post 10520017 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Bozuatle on February 20, 2015, 05:24:14 AM
It's Lent in the Cajun swamp so no booze for me. I'm watching Atlas Shrugged part III on DVD and smoking a e-cig.  I'll have to save the hookers and blow for the next ATH.

Saving the hookers and blow till after lent is a very Christian thing to do. God Bless

Maybe not, but its a very Acadian thing to do.



2102. Post 10520114 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on February 20, 2015, 07:13:00 AM

Isn't it amusing that the Freedom Loving ancap bitcoiners post mainly to command other users to ignore and don't reply to this and that?  Grin

(Myself, I can ignore people on my head.  I don't see why one needs a computer to do that.)

at least no one gets thrown into jail and fined for ignoring this suggestion  Roll Eyes

I'm not sure the good professor can appreciate the distinction. Bitcoin vs. fiat is a battle of persuasion vs. force. It's a battle in the war for civilization. Yes, we are vastly outnumbered radicals, but so were the Abolitionists and they did pretty well. I'd rather be on the wrong side of a trade than on the wrong side of History.



2103. Post 10520411 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Even with the benefit of hindsight, there's only been two good entry points in the last week (Feb 15 and Feb 18). Kinda makes you wonder how much cash is sitting on the sidelines waiting to buy the next dip.



2104. Post 10520652 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: medialab101 on February 20, 2015, 08:50:10 AM
Nice slow steady uptrend, bears not clogging up the forum with derision and contrived FUD, a nice piece about BTC on CNN that was fairly accurate and informative... what the hell is going on here!?!?!   Huh  Cheesy


It's starting to look a little parabolicky. Might be time to tap the brakes soon (or at least ease off the gas a little). 



2105. Post 10520722 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 20, 2015, 09:00:07 AM
looks to me like the no sub-230 coins held ... and we had 3 good, solid tests of 240, I would not be surprised to never see sub-240 again either.

Just be prepared mentally for such outcomes with bitcoin, its a tough market to trade long and medium term like that.

"Tough times don't last. Tough people do." - unattributed

I'd feel more bullish if we hang out in the $240s for a while to consolidate and give people some time to get used to that price as normal first, but if we continue at a sustainable pace then I may re-evauate my analysis (ok guess) that this is less an intentional short squeeze initiated by powerful market manipulators and more of an actual trend reversal.



2106. Post 10520839 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on February 20, 2015, 09:12:23 AM
Nice slow steady uptrend, bears not clogging up the forum with derision and contrived FUD, a nice piece about BTC on CNN that was fairly accurate and informative... what the hell is going on here!?!?!   Huh  Cheesy


Bitcoin is here to surprise you. When everyone has gotten used to the bear market, trolls and dumpage, it will quietly disappear to mess with your mind Smiley

?? We were $20 higher five days ago. Don't you think proclaiming an end of the bear market is a little premature? How abouts we go a week without a $40 dump first?



2107. Post 10521274 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Erdogan on February 20, 2015, 10:11:31 AM
This is why it is so fascinating. The most logical thing for them to do is to default HARD on that debt, start from a clean slate, and we will all be vacationing in Greece next year due to the affordable prices. The Greeks are already in the worst case senario, it can't get much worse economically - the only place where it can get worse is that the Greke population may take a haircut on their savings by converting to Drachmas. If I was in charge of Greece, and I was brave enough, I'd default.



That would be the logical thing to do. Unfortunately for Greece, their politicians got in on pledging to end austerity. Which means more spending which means more borrowing. Something has to give. They can't even inflate their way out of it *and* remain in the Euro. It won't be pretty. Though if it ends with everyone fleeing the Euro, that would be a good thing.

I still think the greeks have the best poker cards. No politician want to expose that every state is insolvent. My guess is, they will extend more loans, make it look (to greeks) that they won (their national dignity, which seems like an important thing), make it look (to germans) that it cost them nothing. Using the standard politician newspeak, inventing a new meme to sign it off. Bad solution, risk up, eventually the general market will tear apart either the euro or the EU or both.


We've already covered that many times. If Greece gets better terms, then every other deadbeat country will want them too. I think the new Greek government promised what they can't possibly deliver: a debt writedown, end of austerity AND staying in the Euro. No way they do all three. No way their is no pain for Greeks. Very difficult for Greeks not to blame Tsipras and Veroufakas when the pain comes. Very likely they will get replaced by either banker toadies or far right reactionaries.



2108. Post 10521354 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Erdogan on February 20, 2015, 10:29:49 AM
This is why it is so fascinating. The most logical thing for them to do is to default HARD on that debt, start from a clean slate, and we will all be vacationing in Greece next year due to the affordable prices. The Greeks are already in the worst case senario, it can't get much worse economically - the only place where it can get worse is that the Greke population may take a haircut on their savings by converting to Drachmas. If I was in charge of Greece, and I was brave enough, I'd default.



That would be the logical thing to do. Unfortunately for Greece, their politicians got in on pledging to end austerity. Which means more spending which means more borrowing. Something has to give. They can't even inflate their way out of it *and* remain in the Euro. It won't be pretty. Though if it ends with everyone fleeing the Euro, that would be a good thing.

I still think the greeks have the best poker cards. No politician want to expose that every state is insolvent. My guess is, they will extend more loans, make it look (to greeks) that they won (their national dignity, which seems like an important thing), make it look (to germans) that it cost them nothing. Using the standard politician newspeak, inventing a new meme to sign it off. Bad solution, risk up, eventually the general market will tear apart either the euro or the EU or both.


We've already covered that many times. If Greece gets better terms, then every other deadbeat country will want them too. I think the new Greek government promised what they can't possibly deliver: a debt writedown, end of austerity AND staying in the Euro. No way they do all three. No way their is no pain for Greeks. Very difficult for Greeks not to blame Tsipras and Veroufakas when the pain comes. Very likely they will get replaced by either banker toadies or far right reactionaries.

I don't think the terms matter. Only the words, which are spoken for effect.


Ordinarily I might agree with you, but Greece can't possibly have economic recovery under present terms. Servicing their debt is sucking too much money out of their economy. Syrzia (sp?) can try to deflect blame (for breaking campaign promises), but you can't fill empty bellies with rhetoric, so they will fail.



2109. Post 10521386 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

BFX BTC swaps are down. Some bears must be cutting losses on their puts. Game theory: the first defectors win, just like Switzerland dropping the Euro peg. Sucks to be you, Riksbank.



2110. Post 10526748 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 20, 2015, 04:53:16 AM
jameson was involved in the first 132.79585631 purchase

no alcohol involved in the second purchase

go big or go home



Geez, the USD swap rate is getting up there. Slow your roll, Camo. That's a perfectly reasonable purchase, but we need to consolidate in this range for a while before the assault on $250. If we get much higher, take some profit and get back in 4 or 5 dollars lower.

Wow, I sure called that one right. Maybe I'm starting to get the hang of this.



2111. Post 10526871 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: empowering on February 20, 2015, 07:47:08 PM
Greece, euro zone creditors reach accord on loan

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/20/us-eurozone-greece-idUSKBN0LO0O620150220

" Euro zone finance ministers reached an agreement on Friday to extend heavily indebted Greece's financial rescue by four months, officials on both sides said.

"It's done. For four months," one said."

Can kicked.



2112. Post 10527430 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Richy_T on February 20, 2015, 08:10:23 PM
This is why it is so fascinating. The most logical thing for them to do is to default HARD on that debt, start from a clean slate, and we will all be vacationing in Greece next year due to the affordable prices. The Greeks are already in the worst case senario, it can't get much worse economically - the only place where it can get worse is that the Greke population may take a haircut on their savings by converting to Drachmas. If I was in charge of Greece, and I was brave enough, I'd default.

It would be nice to see a lot of countries defaulting on the grounds that their government can't be held to the debts of previous governments. Then perhaps we'd see an end to this whole government debt thing. Children should not be shouldered with the debt of their deadbeat ancestors.

That's just not gonna happen, although I agree with you it would be nice.The 2008 crises tore back the curtain and we finally got to see how the sausages were made (to mix metaphors). Governments and particularly the USG are functionally just the enforcement arms for the banks. The are the leg-breakers employed by the loan sharks. If they side against the banks, they lose their jobs.



2113. Post 10527641 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: o0‡0o on February 20, 2015, 08:54:14 PM
Greek deal is reached (apparently - though we have had many false starts). Bitcoin is flat... interesting.


It's so funny to watch. Syriza was all like "we're getting out of the Euro, blablabla".
What did they get? An extension which would have been granted to any political party who would have won.
A change of name for the Troika, so that they can brag to the Greek citizens.
Ridiculous.
You can not smash the fist on the table and at the same time hold the hand open

(tell me how is it smashing a open hand on the table)

"I can't stand cheap people. It makes me real mad when someone says something like: Hey, when are you going to pay me that $100 you owe me? or: Do you have that $50 you borrowed? Man, quit being so cheap!"
~Jack Handy



2114. Post 10527774 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Specular on February 20, 2015, 08:32:47 PM
Greek deal is reached (apparently - though we have had many false starts). Bitcoin is flat... interesting.


It's so funny to watch. Syriza was all like "we're getting out of the Euro, blablabla".
What did they get? An extension which would have been granted to any political party who would have won.
A change of name for the Troika, so that they can brag to the Greek citizens.
Ridiculous.

I guess they capitulated when they saw how close their Banks were to complete collapse (1Billion Euro Deposit flight today). That, or they threatened their families lol.

Though this isn't over until its over. I would not be surprised if the Greeks throw a curve ball - maybe deliver some watered down version on Monday and we are back to "he said she said".


"I don't mind broken Promises. I just think: Why did they believe me?" ~Jack Handy

I'm starting to suspect Jack was a Greek.



2115. Post 10527919 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: inca on February 20, 2015, 09:32:03 PM
Anyone else think it is ironic that americans love to slag off greece for growing an unpayable national debt and going broke? I mean the fed printed how much of your deficit last year? Or the year before? Or the year before that? lol..

Literally the only difference between the US/UK/Japan and greece is a magical money printing machine denominated in greek euros.

The ECB will print. What else can they do?

There's a huge difference between borrowing from your own central bank and borrowing from some other country's banks. And yes, the ECB will print.

"If I ever get rich, I hope I'm not real mean to poor people, like I am now."~Jack Handy



2116. Post 10528110 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Erdogan on February 20, 2015, 09:57:53 PM
Weekend pump or weekend dump?

Smart trader: We had a pump last weekend, and since statistics with a sample of one is a good statistic, we will have a pump this weekend BUY

Smarter trader: Smart traders are smart, but I am even smarter, so I do the opposite SELL

Even smarter trader: Some traders think they are smart, some think they are smarter, but I am going to front run them all BUY


Kenesian econometrist: I have this model with a hundred variables, including the velocity of money, which I have trimmed with love and care so I can prove that it is historically correct, so I know (those blind sheep...) but I won't tell anyone until monday.

You question gives away the answer: If what happens is what the most people least suspect, then we'll go sideways, because that wasn't even an option in your question.



2117. Post 10528200 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: LewiesMan on February 20, 2015, 10:06:33 PM
seems to be holding, weirdly enough.

Yeah what's weird about it is that the 1 HR moving average was in immanent danger of crossing, which almost always means a dump.



2118. Post 10528328 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

It's easy to sit there and say you'd like to have more money. And I guess that's what I like about it. It's easy. Just sitting there, rocking back and forth, wanting that money.  
~Jack Handy



2119. Post 10528477 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Erdogan on February 20, 2015, 10:29:32 PM
Greek deal is reached (apparently - though we have had many false starts). Bitcoin is flat... interesting.


It's so funny to watch. Syriza was all like "we're getting out of the Euro, blablabla".
What did they get? An extension which would have been granted to any political party who would have won.
A change of name for the Troika, so that they can brag to the Greek citizens.
Ridiculous.

They need a better meme before this is over

Troika repayment redefined
Flexible repayment
Soft repayment
Dignity deal
Prosperity swap
No greek left behind
Euro Unity Reassurance deal
Responsible Prosperity
respionsible anti austerity
Hellenic eternal enlightenment revival and inclusion treaty of the 21.century

Something.


Happy to quote myself here, because it was borderline brilliant. Anyone want to chirp in? A good meme for the politically grand success of todays Eurogroup meeting.


Grecian repayment formula 44?



2120. Post 10530429 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: byronbb on February 21, 2015, 03:23:49 AM
CHinese futures markets getting frothy.
It's more like a gambling market. But we can't say futures is bad.

Same pattern as last weekend. SOmeone dropped a few megas on 796 out of the blue and we steamed from $220 -> $260.

There's a difference. Slower, more healthy pump this time. That's gonna draw in more new money and a higher top before correcting. Some people have been waiting a week for $230 coins and at some point they're going to give up and buy in at the next five dollar dip.



2121. Post 10530650 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: camolist on February 21, 2015, 04:42:04 AM
out at 245 things seem uneasy (which probably means we'll rocket to 5000 before i wake up tomorrow)

bitfinex account stands at +7.1 BTC with all *margin* positions closed

jameson was involved in the first 132.79585631 purchase
no alcohol involved in the second purchase
go big or go home
[]http://i.imgur.com/bTc7pF8.png[/img]

I doubt it. If we can hold for 48 HRs there will be a good sized pump Sunday night as all the weekend bargain hunters get back in before the banks open. I'm predicting and hoping for boredom.



2122. Post 10544410 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

BTC swaps on BFX up to 20,880. Gee, I wonder why bears would be short-selling if they still had any coins to dump. I'm thinking they don't.

Lesse...bears upside-down and trapped. Can't cut losses w/o driving the price up higher. And me sitting here with this big pile of fiat. Hmmmmm. think I'll buy.





2123. Post 10544941 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: Dump3er on February 22, 2015, 02:28:52 PM
BTC swaps on BFX up to 20,880. Gee, I wonder why bears would be short-selling if they still had any coins to dump. I'm thinking they don't.

Lesse...bears upside-down and trapped. Can't cut losses w/o driving the price up higher. And me sitting here with this big pile of fiat. Hmmmmm. think I'll buy.




Ay, dude! When you were writing, this small dump has triggered the whole rise from 152.2$ to a bear flag.

Have fun, with what is coming now!  Cheesy



Well it saved me some money, getting in at a lower price!



2124. Post 10545426 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Interest rate on swaps just doubled. Do you think Bulls will run out of fiat to borrow before bears run out of coins to borrow?



2125. Post 10545515 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: podyx on February 22, 2015, 03:45:29 PM
Interest rate on swaps just doubled. Do you think Bulls will run out of fiat to borrow before bears run out of coins to borrow?

What does this mean?

Well, it's gone back down now, but what it means is demand to borrow BTC (to sell it short) has gone up relative to the supply, so the lenders can charge more interest. This could be bullish as in dumpers are running out of coins to dump or bearish as in more people think the market is going down.



2126. Post 10549126 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: damiano on February 22, 2015, 07:56:02 PM
Hmm looks like a few longs were spooked

Down to 15.9mill now

That lowers the chance for another long squeeze double bottom or lower. If this is indeed a trader's (as opposed to buyer's, seller's or holder's market), then the real money is in the forced liquidation of leveraged positions short and long. That means binary outcomes.

Longs still substantially outnumber shorts and in the past that meant the next big squeeze is on the shorts. In other words, see through the chop and we're still moving up.

I could be wrong though, so anyone who's nervous can sell and that's fine with me.



2127. Post 10549942 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: CryptoGoon on February 22, 2015, 10:43:29 PM
Looking close to decision, so far feels like a lot of stop long hunting going on



Just on that chart, Longs have had three major opportunities to lock in profits and many of them have done so, meaning they have fiat to spend. If price goes down from here, I'm just going continue to add to my long position. In order to trigger a stop loss, one must first have a loss and my margin long is still in profit territory.



2128. Post 10550542 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: nutschig on February 23, 2015, 12:23:10 AM
Half-true article on the history of money. Szabo did it better, but this is more entertaining.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-21/why-does-fiat-money-seemingly-work

Quote
By contrast, in a fiat money system in which interest rates are administered by a bureaucratic central economic planning agency the signals sent by interest rates to entrepreneurs about expected future consumer demand and the true cost of capital are continually falsified, and thereby encourage malinvestment of scarce capital. Phases during which the supply of credit and money expands strongly and malinvestments proliferate are known as “economic booms”, and everybody loves them. When a boom turns to bust and the liquidation of malinvested capital becomes necessary, few people are aware that the preceding boom is at fault. And so the cry for more monetary and fiscal intervention arises, which lengthens and deepens the malaise by putting malinvested capital on artificial life support.

A near-textbook explanation of Austrian Business Cycle Theory. In Austrian economics, the capital structure of an economy is key. Booms and busts are caused/amplified by distortions in the market rate cost of money (interest). The fact that these distortions are intentionally caused by Central bankers implementing Keynesian policy is why Austrians and Keynesians have such animosity towards each other.

The bitcoin economy is currently experiencing a bull market in the fiat asset class due to deflation/ credit contraction in the fiat world. Central banks have hit the zero bound (interest rates can't go below zero or people will just hold onto their money) and have also resorted to outright counterfeiting (quantitative easing), but the consumer still won't spend. They tools they used to boost aggregate demand merely pushed demand forward and now there is little else they can do.

The bitcoin bear market looked at from the other direction is a fiat boom that will inevitably bust, but Keynes was right about one thing: Markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent, which is why leveraged speculating is so dangerous even if you get the fundamentals right. 



2129. Post 10550925 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

If this bear market has been largely caused by Chinese miners that can do nothing with bitcoins except sell them, then it is likely to end when one of two things happen: Either they run out of stockpiled coins to sell over and above coins they are mining, or when the Chinese economy gets so bad that they realize that the killer app is to sneak out of the country with them.

Right now Bitcoins seems to be an answer in search of a problem: Most obviously capital controls in a world where capital is still largely mobile. When this situation changes, it is likely to be sudden and swift although the time frame is difficult to predict with any accuracy.



2130. Post 10550946 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Leveraged bears on BFX now @ 21,302. That means they are in even more danger of being squeezed now than they were yesterday $12 higher. Bears and bulls both doubling down, betting which way it's gonna break, but in the mean time we have some nice stability for the users :-)



2131. Post 10551036 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: silverfuture on February 23, 2015, 01:55:47 AM
If this bear market has been largely caused by Chinese miners that can do nothing with bitcoins except sell them, then it is likely to end when one of two things happen: Either they run out of stockpiled coins to sell over and above coins they are mining, or when the Chinese economy gets so bad that they realize that the killer app is to sneak out of the country with them.

Right now Bitcoins seems to be an answer in search of a problem: Most obviously capital controls in a world where capital is still largely mobile. When this situation changes, it is likely to be sudden and swift although the time frame is difficult to predict with any accuracy.

Miners aren't the ones selling in this market. It's pure speculative manipulation. A miner would never dump coins and cause the price to decline. They would sell the minimum number of coins necessary to cover costs at the best price possible and stock the rest for a much higher price.

Lets put this one to bed, miners are not dumping coins and they are certainly not doing them as a market order.

Best... Post... Recently.

Gotta agree with rolling. Miners are among the most optimistic of the bulls as a group.

It doesn't matter how optimistic miners are. Miners have to service their debt and to meet expenses just like everybody else. If you postpone selling because of a bear market, you can end up NEEDING to sell more rather than less because the price is lower, the loan payments are higher and all your other expenses remain the same.  It doesn't matter one bit if it's market orders or limit orders creating more overhead resistance.



2132. Post 10551120 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: DaRude on February 23, 2015, 02:09:21 AM
If this bear market has been largely caused by Chinese miners that can do nothing with bitcoins except sell them, then it is likely to end when one of two things happen: Either they run out of stockpiled coins to sell over and above coins they are mining, or when the Chinese economy gets so bad that they realize that the killer app is to sneak out of the country with them.

Right now Bitcoins seems to be an answer in search of a problem: Most obviously capital controls in a world where capital is still largely mobile. When this situation changes, it is likely to be sudden and swift although the time frame is difficult to predict with any accuracy.

Mined coins are not that much, 3600 per day and the Chinese probably only have less than 35% share of that so thats only 1200 coins per days assuming they sell all of them every day.  

There is more belief of short traders and options sellers using leverage.

BTC3600 is not that much  Huh that's like additional $850,000 sell pressure every single day. BTC is not that liquid to easily sustain that.

But some relief will come in 18months

The most predictable factor in bitcoin price is the supply. Halving is already factored into people's calculations of future value, just as the upcoming U.S. Marshal's auction is.



2133. Post 10551196 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: samsonn25 on February 23, 2015, 02:27:35 AM
It would take the largest Mining Cartel a month to mine 20k coins

Or a big mine holding them for 14 months, waiting for the price to recover. More probably the net sum of many miners doing the same, but also speculators who need to liquidate some of their holdings for similar reasons.



2134. Post 10551288 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: samsonn25 on February 23, 2015, 02:38:43 AM
It would take the largest Mining Cartel a month to mine 20k coins

Or a big mine holding them for 14 months, waiting for the price to recover. More probably the net sum of many miners doing the same, but also speculators who need to liquidate some of their holdings for similar reasons.

Unless they have triple deep pockets, im sure they have to pay back the capital expenditure, ultility (electricity a HUGE expense) company, rents and employees salary weekly or monthly.

Well yes, but if they thought the price would recover quickly, they would borrow the money and plan to pay back the loan when the price went back up, but that didn't happen, so they borrowed more...and more. If they are close to maxing out their credit, they could be in deep trouble, particularly when it looks like the next ATH (if it ever happens) could still be a year away.

UPDATE: BTC swaps on BFX now at 21,425.  ~ 3,500 to go before the trap swings shut.  Leveraged bears are taking the bait.



2135. Post 10551467 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: brg444 on February 23, 2015, 03:18:15 AM
If this bear market has been largely caused by Chinese miners that can do nothing with bitcoins except sell them, then it is likely to end when one of two things happen: Either they run out of stockpiled coins to sell over and above coins they are mining, or when the Chinese economy gets so bad that they realize that the killer app is to sneak out of the country with them.

Right now Bitcoins seems to be an answer in search of a problem: Most obviously capital controls in a world where capital is still largely mobile. When this situation changes, it is likely to be sudden and swift although the time frame is difficult to predict with any accuracy.

Miners aren't the ones selling in this market. It's pure speculative manipulation. A miner would never dump coins and cause the price to decline. They would sell the minimum number of coins necessary to cover costs at the best price possible and stock the rest for a much higher price.

Lets put this one to bed, miners are not dumping coins and they are certainly not doing them as a market order.

Best... Post... Recently.

Gotta agree with rolling. Miners are among the most optimistic of the bulls as a group.

It doesn't matter how optimistic miners are. Miners have to service their debt and to meet expenses just like everybody else. If you postpone selling because of a bear market, you can end up NEEDING to sell more rather than less because the price is lower, the loan payments are higher and all your other expenses remain the same.  It doesn't matter one bit if it's market orders or limit orders creating more overhead resistance.

Unfortunately you are making the popular but incorrect assumption that mined coins are mining companies only revenue streams.

{sigh} No, I'm fucking not. Yes, they could be selling hash rates to investors, but then the argument extends to the investors who are overextended rather than the mining companies.



2136. Post 10551628 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 23, 2015, 03:28:10 AM
There are still veterans from 2010-12 who need to be shaken out, or at least forcibly diversified. The Jan 14 shakeout was part of that diversification, not sure it was the last. All that considered, as a speculative bet on a new technology... you could do worse than the good ol' BTC.

Oh, really? And what if Big Money doesn't want to wait that long? What if  a new innovation sparks a grass roots recovery? There's as much danger in waiting for the optimal time to buy as there is in waiting for the optimal time to sell.

I'm one of those veterans and the reason I have survived this long is because of ideological commitment, not money. You could be waiting a long time if you think you can shake me out.



2137. Post 10552629 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on February 23, 2015, 04:30:51 AM
Ok, I'm gonna step into this whirlpool and note that the likes of silverfurtune and billyjoeallen have been real intellectual boons to this thread. The trolls have went into hibernation when the bosses have taken hold of the reigns. Primarily, Mr SF ad BJA have made their points and are moving on to their next ones, soon. I just want to say thx to the bosses in due time.

Thanks, Man. Please don't feel the need to defend me against charges of racism, sexism or whatever the crimethink de jour is. Whatever my moral flaws, the reason why I advocate Bicoin is because it is money that doesn't need force or coercion in order to function.

Which would y'all rather have as a neighbor, a racist sexist homophobic who believes in the NonAggression Principle or an egalitarian who wants to make everyone equal by sticking guns in their faces?

Freedom means you have to put up with some unpleasant people with unpleasant ideas, but you don't have to put up with threats of violence by those who claim to be peaceful while having the State do their dirty work for them.



2138. Post 10553250 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: octaft on February 23, 2015, 08:08:30 AM
Not saying you're wrong or right, but include context. Or ignore it all because it is wholly meaningless.

I don't see how any of that makes the originally quoted statement any less xenophobic.

Whatever my moral flaws

It's less "moral flaws" and more "stunning amounts of ignorance."

Save your Ayn Rand bullshit, too. I've said it before and I'll say it again: the last time a bunch of people followed the teachings of a shitty fiction writer, the world got Scientology.

Xenophobic? Of course I am! Xenon is dangerous stuff  Tongue

Rand is influential, but her work is far from my favorite. You should read "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" by R. Heinlein. Puts both Ayn Rand and L. Ron Hubbard to shame. The character Dr. Bernardo de la Paz is philosophically the polar opposite of Jorge, but it's who I picture in my mind whenever I think of him.



2139. Post 10553475 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Afrikoin on February 23, 2015, 10:00:39 AM
Half-true article on the history of money. Szabo did it better, but this is more entertaining.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-21/why-does-fiat-money-seemingly-work

Quote
By contrast, in a fiat money system in which interest rates are administered by a bureaucratic central economic planning agency the signals sent by interest rates to entrepreneurs about expected future consumer demand and the true cost of capital are continually falsified, and thereby encourage malinvestment of scarce capital. Phases during which the supply of credit and money expands strongly and malinvestments proliferate are known as “economic booms”, and everybody loves them. When a boom turns to bust and the liquidation of malinvested capital becomes necessary, few people are aware that the preceding boom is at fault. And so the cry for more monetary and fiscal intervention arises, which lengthens and deepens the malaise by putting malinvested capital on artificial life support.

A near-textbook explanation of Austrian Business Cycle Theory. In Austrian economics, the capital structure of an economy is key. Booms and busts are caused/amplified by distortions in the market rate cost of money (interest). The fact that these distortions are intentionally caused by Central bankers implementing Keynesian policy is why Austrians and Keynesians have such animosity towards each other.

The bitcoin economy is currently experiencing a bull market in the fiat asset class due to deflation/ credit contraction in the fiat world. Central banks have hit the zero bound (interest rates can't go below zero or people will just hold onto their money) and have also resorted to outright counterfeiting (quantitative easing), but the consumer still won't spend. They tools they used to boost aggregate demand merely pushed demand forward and now there is little else they can do.

The bitcoin bear market looked at from the other direction is a fiat boom that will inevitably bust, but Keynes was right about one thing: Markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent, which is why leveraged speculating is so dangerous even if you get the fundamentals right. 

"
We asked him where he thought the gold price will be in five years and he said “measurably higher.”
 
In private conversation I asked him about the outstanding debts… and that the debt load in the U.S. had gotten so great that there has to be some monetary depreciation. Specially he said that the era of quantitative easing and zero-interest rate policies by the Fed… we really cannot exit this without some significant market event… By that I interpret it being either a stock market crash or a prolonged recession, which would then engender another round of monetary reflation by the Fed.
 "

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-22/alan-greenspan-warns-there-will-be-%E2%80%9Csignificant-market-event-something-big-going-hap

Also, this sounds like creative destruction - schumpeter.

Everything on this planet runs on polarity. Ying and Yang. No booms without busts.

Well yeah. The only way to fix the capital structure is for the good bad capital managers to go broke so the capital gets transferred to the good capital managers.  You could attempt to do this through central planning but you would fail due to the economic calculation problem. So basically I agree. There is no way to for interest rates to normalize w/o a crash. 



2140. Post 10555132 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 23, 2015, 01:27:49 PM

you cant really be sexist/homophob/racist and a nonagression believer at the same time because being sexist/homophob/racist implies aggression.

How do you figure? Does not associating or wanting to associate with people do violence to them? Am I aggressed against if someone doesn't invite me to a party? Ask me to marry her? Hire me? Give me a loan?

If so, then you seem to have a different understanding of "aggression" than me. I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that.
However, if you agree that that type of aggression is bad, then anything else is changing the subject.



2141. Post 10555264 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 23, 2015, 02:13:16 PM
...I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that...

I lived in several US states allowing me to use violence to protect my property.  You [nonviolently] come on my property, I shoot you in the face.
What's wrong with that?

That's why I very specifically wrote "INITIATING" physical violence. Self defense and defense of one's property is not initiation. Can you fucking read or do I have to ignore you again?

I'm not going to argue over exactly how much defensive force is justifiable in a given hypothetical case. There are always borderline cases that will be decided differently in different places, times and circumstances. People have rights, including the right to defend those rights up to the point just shy of violating somebody else's rights.



2142. Post 10555401 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on February 23, 2015, 02:28:39 PM
Which would y'all rather have as a neighbor, a racist sexist homophobic who believes in the NonAggression Principle or an egalitarian who wants to make everyone equal by sticking guns in their faces?

I'd like to have you as a neighbor. Your ability to put succinctly into words what I've been thinking anyway makes me happy. One day I will repay you by buying you an evenings worth of beer or whatever drug of your choice  Cheesy

was that gay? I think this was a bit gay. Hope you don't hate me now  Shocked

It's a deal! And just so you know, I think gays should be free to do whatever the hell they want as long as it doesn't hurt anybody (unless you're into that), but I have a right to be grossed out by it.



2143. Post 10555581 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 23, 2015, 02:25:18 PM
telling other people that their languages are some form of "tribal grunt" is a form of aggression in my book. that kind of verbal aggression usually precedes the actual act of physical aggression because that idea is based usually on a concept of a superiority of some sort.

just like the nazis claimed that they race is superior to others and used that construct as an argument to kill 5 mil of jews, you are claiming that you are leaving in an english dominated world and all non english talkers should suck your dick.

Verbal aggression may often precede physical aggression, but it's not the same thing. Sticks and stones may break your bones but words will never (physically) hurt you. I don't give a shit about your feelings and I have no problem if you don't give a shit about mine. Nobody has a right to not have their feelings hurt.

If you can't make the distinction between genocide and overgeneralizing group characteristics, then you have a problem. There is a major difference in kind and not just in degree.

Nobody has the right to be included in a free association. That would make the association not free, so if I reject people for not speaking English properly, it only makes me a grammar Nazi, not a homicidal National Socialist. You can call me a racist sexist asshole all you want. I only have the right to argue against you or ignore it. I don't have the right to punch you in the nose.

I think English is a superior language and so those who speak it are superior, all things else being equal. You have a right to disagree, but freedom means tolerating people who think differently than you do. Besides, what would we talk about if we agreed on everything? I'm guessing we'd discuss how superior we are to everybody who disagreed with US. Then you would want to FORCE people to agree with us or at least act like they did. We'd be worse than assholes. We'd be bullies. How boring.




2144. Post 10555663 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 23, 2015, 02:29:10 PM
...I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that...

I lived in several US states allowing me to use violence to protect my property.  You [nonviolently] come on my property, I shoot you in the face.
What's wrong with that?

That's why I very specifically wrote "INITIATING" physical violence. Self defense and defense of one's property is not initiation. Can you fucking read or do I have to ignore you again?

By being a sexist bigot you are initiating violence.  Stop triggering me brah.  Clearly I wouldn't shoot you in the face unless you incited & richly deserved it.

In order to incite you, I would have to have the ability to control your actions with words. Do you lack self control to the degree that I can do that?



2145. Post 10555683 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 23, 2015, 03:02:31 PM
telling other people that their languages are some form of "tribal grunt" is a form of aggression in my book. that kind of verbal aggression usually precedes the actual act of physical aggression because that idea is based usually on a concept of a superiority of some sort.

just like the nazis claimed that they race is superior to others and used that construct as an argument to kill 5 mil of jews, you are claiming that you are leaving in an english dominated world and all non english talkers should suck your dick.



I think English is a superior language and so those who speak it are superior, all things else being equal. You have a right to disagree, but freedom means tolerating people who think differently than you do.



on which basis you are making those claims?

how many languages do you speak you faggot?

Are you flirting with me?



2146. Post 10555836 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 23, 2015, 03:14:43 PM
...I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that...

I lived in several US states allowing me to use violence to protect my property.  You [nonviolently] come on my property, I shoot you in the face.
What's wrong with that?

That's why I very specifically wrote "INITIATING" physical violence. Self defense and defense of one's property is not initiation. Can you fucking read or do I have to ignore you again?

By being a sexist bigot you are initiating violence.  Stop triggering me brah.  Clearly I wouldn't shoot you in the face unless you incited & richly deserved it.

In order to incite you, I would have to have the ability to control your actions with words. Do you lack self control to the degree that I can do that?

You clearly are controlling my actions with words--you call me nigger bitch, I shoot you in the face.  What's so hard to understand here?

you also missed this:
Quote
No.  "Violence" is not binary, it's very creepy and analog-gradienty.  Theft is violence.  Farting through silk and not sharing while others starve is violence.  Private property is violence.  Violence begets violence.

If you have the inability to YOUR OWN actions, then you have a problem.
Your words aren't controlling MY actions. Not anymore. Yer back on the ignore list.



2147. Post 10555883 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: damiano on February 23, 2015, 03:20:59 PM
The next few days will be interesting if we can hold where we are now.  To many shorts now along with longs and this leveraged fiasco isn't going to end well which ever way it goes. 

Losses will be catastrophic one way or another.

I don't think many of the longs are excessively leveraged. I am wagering that there are many more of them who are leveraged to a smaller degree. I know I am. You'd have to dump to double digits to force my margin call, and that's only if I don't post more margin by then. The long squeeze to ~$166 should have taught us all a lesson. The short squeeze to $475 was far enough back that it might have slipped down the memory hole for some of the bears.



2148. Post 10555970 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 23, 2015, 03:30:57 PM

in a modern world full of ak47, m16 and other machinery the "biological equivalence of abilities of men and women" sounds to me like women are only missed in dick swinging contests.

try to marry some of those guys and you will find out the meaning of the word violence.

What a load of crap. How many top level women chess players are there? Poker players? How many Nobel prize-winning scientists? Top engineers? They exist, but the percentages are tiny. If humanity was all women who reproduced asexually, we'd all be living in very well-decorated mud huts.

Women's brains are different. They have less grey matter and more connective tissue. So do psychopaths.



2149. Post 10556173 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 23, 2015, 03:49:09 PM

in a modern world full of ak47, m16 and other machinery the "biological equivalence of abilities of men and women" sounds to me like women are only missed in dick swinging contests.

try to marry some of those guys and you will find out the meaning of the word violence.

What a load of crap. How many top level women chess players are there? Poker players? How many Nobel prize-winning scientists? Top engineers? They exist, but the percentages are tiny. If humanity was all women who reproduced asexually, we'd all be living in very well-decorated mud huts.

there is a reason for that> women suffered from male oppression for thousands of years.

Survey after survey shows that women are less happy now than in the 1950s, and a huge number are on anti-depressants. Why do you think that is?



2150. Post 10556270 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 23, 2015, 03:57:29 PM
people like billyjoe should be institutionalized!

The Soviets put people who didn't agree with them in mental hospitals. Evil people can't handle the cognitive dissonance.



2151. Post 10556295 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on February 23, 2015, 04:03:17 PM
Some absolute crap getting discussed today on here.

Take it to off topic.

The chart is boring, but if you have something interesting and relevant to say, I'm listening. Actually, I'm listening anyways because...the chart is boring.



2152. Post 10556426 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 23, 2015, 04:17:41 PM
I believe that it is not a coincidence that there are so few women who are "into" bitcoin.  Grin

bitcoin or computer science or engineering or any of the stuff that separates us from primitive subsistence-level savages.

You gotta love these feminist women complaining about male oppression, living in houses they didn't build, talking on phones they didn't invent, typing on computers they didn't program, driving cars they didn't design, going to stores they don't manage to spend money they didn't earn.



2153. Post 10560516 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: silverfuture on February 23, 2015, 05:39:44 PM
Rhonda Rousey is one of the biggest stars and draws of the show. She beautiful, intelligent, and tough as fucking nails. A good role model for empowering women IMO.



And yet the toughest guy in any town with a population over 5,000 could beat her to a pulp. It's like being the midget who's best as basketball.

IMHO, a woman who can cook is more sexy. Why only value women who are good at men's stuff? It's really hard to be a good mom and a good wife, judging the the divorce rates and the character of this last generation of teenagers. We should appreciate the one's who do that job well and maybe that would incentivise the rest to try harder and quit wasting time trying to be badasses or things they probably don't have aptitude for and probably wouldn't enjoy as much.




2154. Post 10560781 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: silverfuture on February 24, 2015, 12:03:46 AM


I'll bet Rhonda can cook too. I'd marry her in a heartbeat and I KNOW she could still beat your firefighting redneck ass any day. Cheesy


Well she certainly can't act. Did you see expendables III?  I don't fight women. I fight fire. If you're being attacked by ninjas, call Rhonda. If your house is burning down, call me.



2155. Post 10562346 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Price is still holding.  It's entirely possible that we are near the base for the next rally. It may take a few hard tests of support to be sure, though.



2156. Post 10562852 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Tuck Fheman on February 24, 2015, 05:44:59 AM
Buying bitcoin all the way down anticipating a bull market that’s delayed and then panic selling right before it begins ...



... it's kind of like that.

I actually did that right after the crash to $340. I dumped right before the rocket ride to $680 and had to wait for it to come back down to get back in. You have no idea how bad that sucked but it you think about it, is has to happen to somebody, because deep pockets ain't gonna pump if they know you have coins to dump on their heads if they do, so they wait for enough people to dump that they know they control the supply.



2157. Post 10562969 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: macsga on February 24, 2015, 05:59:36 AM
On other news...

Bitcoin.de Launches Integration With Fidor Bank Accounts

Bitcoin.de's long-standing partnership with Fidor Bank has finally borne fruit, with the company claiming it is the world’s first bitcoin trading platform with a "direct connection to the classic banking system".

Bitcoin.de says the arrangement brings far faster service, allowing EUR/BTC trades to be completed within "seconds" when both customers have a free 'FIDOR Smart Giro Account'.



http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-de-launches-integration-with-fidor-bank-accounts/

Coinbase and Circle NEED to do this also. I'm talking an account with a retail bank (not SVB commercial bank) so I don't have to wait four damn business days for bitcoin delivery. The first U.S. exchange to allow instant purchases with their partner bank will prolly get 50,000 accounts with people direct depositing their paychecks.



2158. Post 10584583 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

BTC swaps on bfx up to~23,500.  Getting closer to bear season, but I think we need at least 25K before the Big Squeeze.



2159. Post 10584679 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on February 26, 2015, 02:51:37 AM
Nice try with that throwback Chinese panic dump. Market giving shorts false sense of hope and dealing pain to longs with tight stops. Figures.


P.s. why today's announcement of the new bitcoin derivatives exchange is a "game changer".

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102456187

Quote
This is why the announcement of a bitcoin futures-and-options broker is so exciting. Merchants will have more options to hedge bitcoin exposure which eventually could lead to fewer merchants immediately converting to fiat

And you can expect bitpay and coinbase will be using this new service!

If you could tolerate the third party risk, why not just take your cold storage coins and double down by putting them into 1 or 2 YR futures and go long?  If youbelieve long term priceis headed up, you could increase your profit w/oputting additionalcapital at risk. Also a futures market would be a much more accurate gauge on upcoming price movements than the nearly universally terrible technical analysis from Coindesk, cryptocoin news etc.

EDIT: the above link says NOTHING about the derivates exchange. Not a launch date, not a URL, not a name. nada.



2160. Post 10584836 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Um, most libertarians (unlike myself) are just classical liberals, like those radicals Jefferson, Madison, Washington, Lafayette, John Jay, etc. You can disagree with their political philosophy (as I do), but it's hard to call them "monsters" or their politics "monstrous" in the context of their contemporaries, nearly all of whom were far worse.

"Only a few prefer liberty, the majority seek nothing more than fair masters" ~Gaius Sallustius Crispus (86-34 BC)



2161. Post 10584902 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

23,985 BTC swaps on bfx! Why would anyone sell short when they could just sell their coins? Oh, that's right.They don't have any. Leverage is piling up on bith sides. This is gonna blow big one way or the other.



2162. Post 10584988 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on February 26, 2015, 04:02:01 AM
It is 50k BTC of demand satiated in a day. Not inconsequential.

But is it 50k of demand from those that would use exchanges, or from those who would buy off-exchange?

It's also 50k BTC of selling pressure relived in a day. It's been know for a long time and priced in.



2163. Post 10585077 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 26, 2015, 04:19:32 AM
What a fucking clown. Using bitcoin as a currency for a country:
https://twitter.com/jonmatonis/status/570609094438088705

Until now I believed that Jon Matonis was one of the few sensible and realist people in the bitcon scene (even though he is a bitcoin salesman).  But that is just too naive (or insincere).  Oh well...
e

So what is YOUR take on nations spending money that the unborn will have to repay? If that's not taxation w/o representation, then what is it? You think that's moral? We fought a war against the strongest empire on earth to stop that kind of tyranny.

Are you gonna make some bullshit argument that the ends justifies the means as long as they invest the loot right?



2164. Post 10585092 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on February 26, 2015, 04:27:47 AM
Nice try with that throwback Chinese panic dump. Market giving shorts false sense of hope and dealing pain to longs with tight stops. Figures.


P.s. why today's announcement of the new bitcoin derivatives exchange is a "game changer".

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102456187

Quote
This is why the announcement of a bitcoin futures-and-options broker is so exciting. Merchants will have more options to hedge bitcoin exposure which eventually could lead to fewer merchants immediately converting to fiat

And you can expect bitpay and coinbase will be using this new service!

If you could tolerate the third party risk, why not just take your cold storage coins and double down by putting them into 1 or 2 YR futures and go long?  If youbelieve long term priceis headed up, you could increase your profit w/oputting additionalcapital at risk. Also a futures market would be a much more accurate gauge on upcoming price movements than the nearly universally terrible technical analysis from Coindesk, cryptocoin news etc.

EDIT: the above link says NOTHING about the derivates exchange. Not a launch date, not a URL, not a name. nada.

Coindesk hasn't picked this story up yet?!?

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ex-goldman-director-launches-bitcoin-derivatives-brokerage-2015-02-25-5203121

I found the name of the exchange: it's called LedgerX. You think those morons could have mentioned it in  the article.

EDIT: there are apparently TWO futures exchanges in the works. cryptofacilities.com is the other.



2165. Post 10585200 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

24,262 BTC swaps on bfx!  Pressure building...



2166. Post 10585241 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: camolist on February 26, 2015, 04:57:20 AM
24,262 BTC swaps on bfx!  Pressure building...

you know what would be fun?

everyone lending btc to quit lending it..

shorts would either get forced into major interest rate hikes or to close their shorts



Rates are already @ 0.031% Fifty percent higher than a week ago. (~.020%)

Dollar rates are also going up, so this is gonna be a fun show one way or the other.




2167. Post 10585372 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 26, 2015, 05:27:23 AM
So what is YOUR take on nations spending money that the unborn will have to repay?

That is terrible, of course.  But replacing a failing currency by a crypto that, if successlul, will make trillionaires of Satoshi & friends is even worse.  Where will those trillions come from?

And if the crypto fails, there will be no one to exchange it for euros at a fixed rate.  Again trillions will have changed hands, with no relation to work done.

sigh. You still haven't read any books on economics.Might I suggest Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt for starters and then The Road to Surfdom by (Nobel Laureate) F.A. Hayek.

Satoshi's trillions will come from the same place as Gates, Jobs, Buffet's billions came from:valuation of assets. If any of them attempted to liquidate those assets in bulk, they would plummet in value, which is why they rarely sell. They use those assets as they were intended to be used.

I myself do not plan to cash out more than 20% of my bitcoins, even if the price skyrockets. I intend to SPEND them. Trade makes both partners better off or it doesn't happen. It's win-win, unlike ANYTHING the government does. If the State did anything worthwhile, they wouldn't have to use force or threat of force to achieve compliance.

Nobody forces you to buy or use bitcoin. Those of us who do understand that it is at our own risk. Fiat currencies, OTOH, are compulsory due to legal tender laws. For that reason I oppose any country adopting bitcoin as a national currency. Instead I advocate the repeal of legal tender laws.

There is more relation to work done with bitcoin than any other currency ever. It is documented proof of work that makes a bitcoin a bitcoin. What makes a dollar a dollar? The whim of a central banker.



2168. Post 10585464 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 26, 2015, 05:27:23 AM

And if the crypto fails, there will be no one to exchange it for euros at a fixed rate.  Again trillions will have changed hands, with no relation to work done.

This is tacit admission that the good professor is using the thoroughly discredited Marxist Labor Theory of Value. The LTOV has been obsolete for more than a century when several economists (including William Stanley Jevons) independently came up with what is known today as Marginal Utility.

Marginal Utility is used by all non marxist economists today, not just Austrians. Keynesians, Monetarists, neoclassical economist all accept it as a better metric. It's like Newton's laws of motion. It's foundational.
If you talk economics and don't understand it, any real economist will know that you are talking out your ass.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marginal_utility

“It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a ‘dismal science.’ But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.”

― Murray N. Rothbard



2169. Post 10585561 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Bozuatle on February 26, 2015, 06:20:46 AM


Do you have a clue to what you are talking about or are you just talking out your ass?

Yes I do. When it comes to economics, even my ass is smarter than a Marxist.



2170. Post 10585655 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Bozuatle on February 26, 2015, 06:29:43 AM
Do you have a clue to what you are talking about or are you just talking out your ass?
Yes I do. When it comes to economics, even my ass is smarter than a Marxist.

So whats your relationship between marginal utility and exchanging fiat for bitcoin? Enlighten me

I buy bitcoin because it is more efficient and easier (for me) than mining it. Specialization allows greater efficiency because miners benefit from economies of scale.

Large sums of fiat are difficult to store and move. Bitcoin is relatively easier if you know how to do it.



2171. Post 10585698 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Bozuatle on February 26, 2015, 06:46:01 AM
Do you have a clue to what you are talking about or are you just talking out your ass?
Yes I do. When it comes to economics, even my ass is smarter than a Marxist.

So whats your relationship between marginal utility and exchanging fiat for bitcoin? Enlighten me

I buy bitcoin because it is more efficient and easier (for me) than mining it. Specialization allows greater efficiency because miners benefit from economies of scale.

Large sums of fiat are difficult to store and move. Bitcoin is relatively easier if you know how to do it.

Alright that totally doesnt answer my question but we will leave it at that.

You should state your question better then. You asked about my relationship. Individuals act according to their own subjective values of utility.



2172. Post 10585773 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Bozuatle on February 26, 2015, 06:58:07 AM
Do you have a clue to what you are talking about or are you just talking out your ass?
Yes I do. When it comes to economics, even my ass is smarter than a Marxist.

So whats your relationship between marginal utility and exchanging fiat for bitcoin? Enlighten me

I buy bitcoin because it is more efficient and easier (for me) than mining it. Specialization allows greater efficiency because miners benefit from economies of scale.

Large sums of fiat are difficult to store and move. Bitcoin is relatively easier if you know how to do it.

Alright that totally doesnt answer my question but we will leave it at that.

You should state your question better then. You asked about my relationship. Individuals act according to their own subjective values of utility.

Yes Exactly! MU is determined by this subjectiveness. So how you could paint such a broad definition was a bit beyond me.  

definition of what? MU? I wasn't using MU as a defense of bitcoin's value. I was using it as an example of Jorge's ignorance of economic theory.



2173. Post 10585926 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Bozuatle on February 26, 2015, 07:13:02 AM
Do you have a clue to what you are talking about or are you just talking out your ass?
Yes I do. When it comes to economics, even my ass is smarter than a Marxist.

So whats your relationship between marginal utility and exchanging fiat for bitcoin? Enlighten me

I buy bitcoin because it is more efficient and easier (for me) than mining it. Specialization allows greater efficiency because miners benefit from economies of scale.

Large sums of fiat are difficult to store and move. Bitcoin is relatively easier if you know how to do it.

Alright that totally doesnt answer my question but we will leave it at that.

You should state your question better then. You asked about my relationship. Individuals act according to their own subjective values of utility.

Yes Exactly! MU is determined by this subjectiveness. So how you could paint such a broad definition was a bit beyond me.  

definition of what? MU? I wasn't using MU as a defense of bitcoin's value. I was using it as an example of Jorge's ignorance of economic theory.

MU isn't a defense of Bitcoins value because MU is subjective. Jorge's ignorance stems from him not understanding that the only thing that will change is the ratio of fiat exchanged for Bitcoin.

I think that's more of a result of his ignorance than the cause. I think he was using a flawed theory of value. If his premise is incorrect, then his conclusion will be incorrect, even if his logic is sound.



2174. Post 10586021 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Bozuatle on February 26, 2015, 07:32:36 AM
Do you have a clue to what you are talking about or are you just talking out your ass?
Yes I do. When it comes to economics, even my ass is smarter than a Marxist.

So whats your relationship between marginal utility and exchanging fiat for bitcoin? Enlighten me

I buy bitcoin because it is more efficient and easier (for me) than mining it. Specialization allows greater efficiency because miners benefit from economies of scale.

Large sums of fiat are difficult to store and move. Bitcoin is relatively easier if you know how to do it.

Alright that totally doesnt answer my question but we will leave it at that.

You should state your question better then. You asked about my relationship. Individuals act according to their own subjective values of utility.

Yes Exactly! MU is determined by this subjectiveness. So how you could paint such a broad definition was a bit beyond me.  

definition of what? MU? I wasn't using MU as a defense of bitcoin's value. I was using it as an example of Jorge's ignorance of economic theory.

MU isn't a defense of Bitcoins value because MU is subjective. Jorge's ignorance stems from him not understanding that the only thing that will change is the ratio of fiat exchanged for Bitcoin.

I think that's more of a result of his ignorance than the cause. I think he was using a flawed theory of value. If his premise is incorrect, then his conclusion will be incorrect, even if his logic is sound.

Garbage in, Garbage out. Just be careful with economic theory because the end result can be mothers not being able to feed their children. 

Sadly true. Anything that is powerful is dangerous.



2175. Post 10586647 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: mybitcoincharts on February 26, 2015, 08:52:35 AM

And if the crypto fails, there will be no one to exchange it for euros at a fixed rate.  Again trillions will have changed hands, with no relation to work done.

This is tacit admission that the good professor is using the thoroughly discredited Marxist Labor Theory of Value. The LTOV has been obsolete for more than a century when several economists (including William Stanley Jevons) independently came up with what is known today as Marginal Utility.

Marginal Utility is used by all non marxist economists today, not just Austrians. Keynesians, Monetarists, neoclassical economist all accept it as a better metric. It's like Newton's laws of motion. It's foundational.
If you talk economics and don't understand it, any real economist will know that you are talking out your ass.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marginal_utility

“It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a ‘dismal science.’ But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.”

― Murray N. Rothbard

Marginal Utility as a concept cannot discredit LTV for the simple reason that both try to explain similar but not identical phenomena. The subject of LTOV is the economy as a whole, whereas marginalists and neoclassical theories describe only markets, a subset of the economy. Marginal Utility fails to describe reality where markets end. That humans reproduce, for example, is an essential variable in an economy, yet it happens outside of markets. Raising kids at home means work has to be done, and in the future potentially results in productive participants of the economy. LTV try to integrate that into the theory, whereas price-oriented theories only become aware of that new person the moment he/she enters the market.

Another example: Simple Machines Forum, the software this forum runs on, is open source, it has been written by people in their free time. Marginalism cannot describe why it is useful despite having been created outside the market.

Despite having read quite a bit from both sides, I still have no clear position on what I prefer. What I dislike about marginalists, though, is that they simply factored out the hard, fuzzy parts of the whole economy and settled on describing just markets.


Marginalism can absolutely describe why open source projects are valuable. What it cannot do and neither can LToV is put an objective vale on such things because objective value doesn't exist. I see the attraction. It would be easier if it did exist, but then again physics would be simpler w/o relativity too. Unfortunately, neither Newtonian physics nor objective value describe reality as well as a more advanced understanding of the fields of study. People are not interchangable. The same person isn't even interchangeable with himself at a different time and place.



2176. Post 10587011 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 26, 2015, 09:53:48 AM
What a fucking clown. Using bitcoin as a currency for a country:
https://twitter.com/jonmatonis/status/570609094438088705

Until now I believed that Jon Matonis was one of the few sensible and realist people in the bitcon scene (even though he is a bitcoin salesman).  But that is just too naive (or insincere).  Oh well...
e

[1]So what is YOUR take on nations spending money that the unborn will have to repay? [2] If that's not taxation w/o representation, then what is it? You think that's moral? [3]We fought a war against the strongest empire on earth to stop that kind of tyranny.

Are you gonna make some bullshit argument that the ends justifies the means as long as they invest the loot right?

Bja, you know I love you. You often want my coins to appreciate, which I like. But this is just retarded.

1) They will inherit the country as well. If the elected government thinks they need to build up some debt to avoid a worse faith for the country, then that's what they must do.
2) It's regular taxation. Most of the choices made by the current generation affects the next. They were represented by their parents and grandparents.
3) If you think you think that the problem with Nazi-Germany was taxation, then your ignorance is close to offensive. Which is quite a feat.


Huh Surely you know I was referring to the American Revolutionary War where taxation w/o representation was explicitly a casus belli. By your reasoning, the colonialists were represented by the King and the Founding Fathers were traitors. You must also know that an heir can inherit wealth if the deceased has a positive net worth but is NOT obligated to take on debts of the deceased if he doesn't. We all have an obligation to our children that we don't have to our parents because nobody chooses to be born.



2177. Post 10587147 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on February 26, 2015, 10:20:59 AM
some nice buys at finex. eat em up!

Most of that was just shorts closing. Swaps are down about a thousand. 



2178. Post 10587475 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 26, 2015, 10:09:46 AM
You still haven't read any books on economics.

I rather stay a stupid electronics engineer turned computer scientist turned appled mathematician..

"appled" mathematician? Like Newton?

Quote
Quote
Satoshi's trillions will come from the same place as Gates, Jobs, Buffet's billions came from:valuation of assets.

Real wealth is houses, land, cars, food, services, etc.  Wealth gets created and destroyed, sometimes both in quick succession, as when a cook prepares a meal that gets eaten right away.  

Bitcoin does not create any wealth. Its contribution to productivity, by (allegedly) being a more efficient payment instrument is tiny.  In fact, the contribution of bitcoin to world's production of wealth, so far, has been humongously negative: 100 times (at least) more wealth has been destroyed by the bitcoin network than has been created thanks to it.

It is not because of that tiny positive contribution that large early adopters have become wealthier, either on paper (if they are still holding) or in reality (if they cashed out).  Bitcoin's effect has been mainly to move property from some people to other people, mostly independently of their actual contribution to society.   The gains from the early adopters, in particular, came from the (substantially bigger) losses of  those who have bough coins and are still holding them.  If bitcoin's price ever reached a million, as the holders dream, then trlliions of wealth would be transferred -- little by little, imperceptibly -- from those who buy bitcoins to those early adopters who hold most of the coins.  If a country like Greece adopted bitcoin, that wealth would be taken from its citizens.  

That is the same trick that governments and banks use when they create more money, indeed. But when the government does it, it is just another kind of tax: the government is supposed to use the wealth that it buys with that new money for the benefit of its citizens.  When banks do it, of course, there is no such return: there is net and permanent transfer of wealth from the general people to bank owners.

And that is the case too when private entities create new money, whether it is gift certificates or Linden Dollars -- or cryptocurrencies.  *That* is why cryptocurrencies are a scam, even if they were to succeed.  

Quote
There is more relation to work done with bitcoin than any other currency ever. It is documented proof of work that makes a bitcoin a bitcoin.

The work of the miners is not constructuve but destructive: the world gets poorer by their work -- with less coal, less water in the hydro dams, etc..  If someone gets rich by destroying wealth, he must be taking more wealth from someone else.

ok, miners produce heat that keeps them warm. They buy equipment which gives people jobs. They make money and stay off of welfare, which reduces the tax burden.  If they mine full time then they reduce unemployment.

These are actually bogus answers, but no more bogus than yours. The real answer is that they are ENTREPRENEURS. Entrepreneurs make guesses about the FUTURE demand for their goods and services and bet their own money that there will be enough demand to make a profit. Traders do the same thing, betting that there will be future demand for liquidity that they can provide. If they fill a market need then they profit and deserve to do so because they took a risk that benefited their trading partners. They have to benefit their trading partners or no trade would take place. The market is people. A person who is successful in the market is successful at serving his fellow man.

You seem to ignore or are incapable of understanding the crucial difference between VOLUNTARY action and COERCION. If Bitcoin fails, it's no more of a waste than any other business venture that doesn't pan out. It's not like a government that takes money BY FORCE and may or may not do good things with it, or forces us to use some particular banknotes as currency, with no assurance as to their future supply. You want to make the world more safe. I can respect that. Can you not see the benefit of making the world more free? Unfortunately, we can't do both. I for one do not want to live in a zoo. I prefer the jungle.



2179. Post 10587629 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: nanobrain on February 26, 2015, 11:26:53 AM
I for one do not want to live in a zoo. I prefer the jungle.

LOL.

You wouldn't last 5 minutes in the jungle, fireman.

That should be my decision to make.



2180. Post 10587746 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 26, 2015, 11:23:45 AM

1) I'm sorry, I forgot who I was talking to.
2) There are very good reasons why that applies to personal debt and very good reasons why they don't apply to public debt. A country is not a person. It doesn't die. If and when it is dissolved, vanquished, conquered, then it is reasonable to ask where the debt goes.


But yes, there is a lot of risk involved with adding to an already huge debt. But sometimes the alternatives are worse. There was no reason to keep adding to the deficit after the dot-com crash of 2001 had been dealt with. So from 2002/2003-2008 both congress and the president should have focused on turning the deficit into a surplus. But instead they decided to gamble the nations future on an oxymoron called big-government conservatism. Kicking the dollar and replacing it with Bitcoin is not going to make republicans (both voters and politicians) less stupid. That requires education, publicly funded education. Even those on the right should recognize this.


1) no problem.
2) a government is not a country.

I'm not conservative (except culturally). I don't want to end the dollar. I want to end the forced use of the dollar by ending legal tender laws. Bitcoin may not ever catch on, but we should be free to use whatever form of money a buyer and seller agrees on.

Education is important, but politicians, bureaucrats and teachers don't have the incentives to do it well, which is why the don't do it well. Public choice economics predicts this and test scores confirm it. Online resources like The Khan Academy is free and take no tax money. That's not the whole solution, but part of it.  https://www.khanacademy.org/



2181. Post 10588104 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 26, 2015, 11:49:36 AM
I guess I'll give you points for being consistent: you're probably not simply 'anti Bitcoin', but against the larger development of excessive 'financialization' (through financial derivatives), right?

You bet.

Money is not real wealth, it is just a token that one can exchange for real wealth things and stuff.


Real wealth is something that most of the "intellectual powerhouses" here will never understand or have; they are too busy obsessing over accumulating stuff and things, measuring themselves against illusions and performing in a loaded game.

+1

real wealth is knowledge.

all other things are...well...things.



That's so fucking profound. Thanks for that original and enlightening thought.
I'm curious what YOU measure yourself against and how you think you're doing. Don't say you don't do it.  All that would mean is you have no interest in self improvement.

Tell me, oh wisetits, how should I measure myself?






2182. Post 10588234 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: empowering on February 26, 2015, 12:33:15 PM
I guess I'll give you points for being consistent: you're probably not simply 'anti Bitcoin', but against the larger development of excessive 'financialization' (through financial derivatives), right?

You bet.

Money is not real wealth, it is just a token that one can exchange for real wealth things and stuff.


Real wealth is something that most of the "intellectual powerhouses" here will never understand or have; they are too busy obsessing over accumulating stuff and things, measuring themselves against illusions and performing in a loaded game.

+1

real wealth is knowledge.

all other things are...well...things.



That's so fucking profound. Thanks for that original and enlightening thought.
I'm curious what YOU measure yourself against and how you think you're doing. Don't say you don't do it.  All that would mean is you have no interest in self improvement.

Tell me, oh wisetits, how should I measure myself?



From the top of the base to the tip? I think anything else is cheating.

LOL. I actually do know some women who are worth listening to on occasion, but the ones that want attention the most are almost never the ones who deserve it. TERA comes to mind. Anybody know what happened to her?



2183. Post 10588374 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 26, 2015, 12:51:33 PM
I guess I'll give you points for being consistent: you're probably not simply 'anti Bitcoin', but against the larger development of excessive 'financialization' (through financial derivatives), right?

You bet.

Money is not real wealth, it is just a token that one can exchange for real wealth things and stuff.


Real wealth is something that most of the "intellectual powerhouses" here will never understand or have; they are too busy obsessing over accumulating stuff and things, measuring themselves against illusions and performing in a loaded game.

+1

real wealth is knowledge.

all other things are...well...things.



That's so fucking profound. Thanks for that original and enlightening thought.
I'm curious what YOU measure yourself against and how you think you're doing. Don't say you don't do it.  All that would mean is you have no interest in self improvement.

Tell me, oh wisetits, how should I measure myself?




you are a stupid fuck so you try to measure everything against something.

but there are some categories that arent really measurable.
  

No, sweetheart- I'm an economist which means I try to measure everything against something. That's what economists do. If something isn't subjectively or objectively measurable, it doesn't exist.



2184. Post 10588508 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: tarmi on February 26, 2015, 01:08:48 PM


so ideas/thoughts dont exist?

and yet, many people here concluded that you are stupid as fuck. care to explain that in numbers?  

Of course thoughts and ideas exist. That's why we use phrases such as "good thought" or "bad idea". We measure them against other thoughts or ideas. For example: arguing with a woman is usually a bad idea for the same reason arguing with a cat is a bad idea.




2185. Post 10588781 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: itod on February 26, 2015, 01:20:50 PM
If something isn't subjectively or objectively measurable, it doesn't exist.

You could at least put smiley at the end, somebody with sarcasm detector broken may actually think you are serious. Or you think that philosophers bothered in vain with metaphysics for centuries, when you can resolve the issue so simply?

The empiricists said it long before me, but you did catch the context, right? In economics, things that can't be compared to something else don't exist. We always ask "as compared to what?"

Coffee is expensive. As compared to what?

Some women are aggravating. As compared to what?

This is a waste of my time. As compared to what?

Hitting myself in the head with a shovel is tempting. As compared to what?




2186. Post 10594235 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: Hfertig on February 26, 2015, 10:36:05 PM
Price seems to be going down a bit now. But I don't think this is going to end in another flash crash. And even if we should go down as much as last night, it will only show the resilience Bitcoin has managed to gain over the past weeks!

to me it looks like a slow grind down.

We've been consolidating with higher highs since Feb Jan 30. Hardly a grind down.

FTFY

why would someone look at this chart and make this assumption on a less than a one month timeframe? Zoom out to one year and all I see is lower highs and lower lows with no indication for a turnaround. Even the downtrend has not been tested once...

It's not a grind down. It's flatter than I've seen it in years. This is a good thing. Our jobs as the decentral bankers is to eat volatility and for now we've eaten it.



2187. Post 10594441 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: itod on February 26, 2015, 11:30:11 PM
Lets see how this translates 2,600 years ago...

Real wealth is houses, land, cars, food, services, etc.  Wealth gets created and destroyed, sometimes both in quick succession, as when a cook prepares a meal that gets eaten right away.  

Gold does not create any wealth. Its contribution to productivity, by (allegedly) being a more efficient payment instrument is tiny.  In fact, the contribution of gold to world's production of wealth, so far, has been humongously negative: 100 times (at least) more wealth has been destroyed by the gold system than has been created thanks to it.

Does not translate.  The replacement of barter by money transactions hugely improved the flow of goods and services, by breaking down complicated multi-party trasactions into independent two-party steps, that could be widely separated in time and space.

Bitcoin, on the other hand, has not yet brought any significant contributions to commerce.  The benefits of bitcoin are, at best, the saving of a few percent in the price of international payments. That is counted as a benefit, because otherwise the payment of those extra fees would have meant waste of work by bank staffers, for services that (allegedly) were not really necessary.  All those saved fees together may barely add up to 10 million dollars.

It is not entirely true that Bitcoin has not yet brought any significant contributions to commerce. Last time I've executed SWIFT international money transfer it was a pain in the ass. Spent half an hour in the bank and had to manually fill and sign a few forms on pieces of paper, bring the paper copy of the invoice to the bank employee, etc. Not to mention the fees, they were far from insignificant. I'm not saying Bitcoin is the similar contribution to civilization as invention of gold coins, but it is not without some practical advantage.

Is everybody forgetting about micropayments?



2188. Post 10595518 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: octaft on February 27, 2015, 02:19:27 AM
Yup, about as unreadable as I remember it.

I actually read it all the way through once. I'm retroactively impressed with myself. Ayn Rand is like that girlfriend that you pretend to listen to when she's yelling at you. She may even be right, but her need for attention is louder than anything she says.



2189. Post 10596177 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 27, 2015, 04:36:46 AM


shorts say hello to destiny

Still @ 23,000!  I don't think they comprehend the gravity of what just happened yet.



2190. Post 10596346 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: mtwelve on February 27, 2015, 05:07:58 AM
When do you think it'll stop? On its way back down? Up to $260?

When those 23000 in BTC swaps on BFX get force liquidated. It'll not go str8 up, but they will not be able to exit w/o driving the price up and squeezing the ones who don't.  When you're on the losing side, the first person to defect loses the least.



2191. Post 10596386 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.00h):

Quote from: mtwelve on February 27, 2015, 05:17:11 AM
When do you think it'll stop? On its way back down? Up to $260?

When those 23000 in BTC swaps on BFX get force liquidated. It'll not go st8 up, but they will not be able to exit w/o driving the price up and squeezing the ones who don't.  When you're on the losing side, the first person to defect loses the least.

Started a long at $257, should get out now?


A margin long? I dunno. Prolly not. If you just made a strait buy then I'd hold. I suspect we'll get a pullback to ~252 or more before the next leg up, but I could easily be wrong. It's a lot easier to hodl when you have a lower base price.



2192. Post 10606912 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 28, 2015, 02:32:57 AM
Strange ass candle on OKCoin on wisdom, what happened there?

a leveraged position blew up.



2193. Post 10606950 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: DaRude on February 28, 2015, 03:21:06 AM
Strange ass candle on OKCoin on wisdom, what happened there?

a leveraged position blew up.

On such a low volume? prob. just a glitch

It may not have been a margin call. It was prolly someone 20:1 long lost his nerve when he saw the chart sinking.



2194. Post 10607078 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: camolist on February 28, 2015, 03:32:29 AM
more bids between 251.8 and 250 than asks from 251.8 to 260

maybe just maybe we continue upwards


You're damn skippy. I got bids in there myself and mine are all hidden orders. Bears are welcome to test that support if u think I'm lying.



2195. Post 10607257 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: DaRude on February 28, 2015, 04:14:17 AM
Think weekend will correct.... Volume is up which is always nice.

Seems that the fiat's being adjusted as it's years end...
Who knows what's cooking behind?

Ask side is looking thin but again those $17.6MM (and growing) in longs had A LOT to do with that. If not for that i'd be really bullish

I can only speak for myself, but the reason why I am margin long is because I have no fast way to send fiat to BFX. I send BTC there to tweak my bids and asks because I can't do that with coinbase as I live in one of the states where their trading platform isn't regulated yet.

I always keep my liquidation price in double digits, so I'm not over-leveraged. yes, there will be a correction at some point, but it may go up significantly before then. There's still a lot of upward momentum.



2196. Post 10609084 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

It appears to be an obvious bullish pennant on the 1 HR chart.  Can any TA gurus confirm?



2197. Post 10610489 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 28, 2015, 12:33:09 PM
I would feel more comfortable if there were more real money keeping the price up. A lot of people going long on margin.

What it means is that there will likely be at least one major retracement if we are indeed at the beginnings of a bull market. The majority of traders appear to think we'll go up before that happens.




2198. Post 10610737 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 28, 2015, 01:15:16 PM
....

Just wanted to quote this bit of comedy for those who might be ignoring these two.

Funniest thing I've seen in ages.

Gotta give credit where it's due.

Lett me get this strait. You are intentionally exposing people to the writings of people you know are purposefully ignored? You are doing this because you know better what people want or ought to read than they know themselves? 

It's a fucking anagram, you arrogant ass clown. Circumventing users control of their own experience is a shitty thing to do here of all places. You ought to know better.



2199. Post 10619051 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Where's my weekend discount? Or is this the weekend discount?




2200. Post 10619217 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 01, 2015, 10:44:01 AM
You're forgetting the large group of people who do not think about Bitcoin price at all.

You mean, those who will buy bitcoin for ideological reasons, at any price? They must all have all run out of money, because they are not buying for 255$, either.

I have a tradeable balance of $35,000. I'm not out money or even close. That doesn't even count fiat I have in my bank account. I'm just waiting for a little bit of retracement to maximally punish any weekend dumpers.



2201. Post 10626272 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

I don't think the shorts are gonna get much of a break. A 9k dump on BFX coundn't break $245 even on a Saturday night and anybody bargain hunting made a quick 9% in minutes and now $258 resistance is support. There is some very substantial upward momentum. I can't see who in their right mind would be selling now when $275 is as close to a sure thing as bitcoin ever gets.

The Feb 26/27 high was breached. Higher highs, higher lows. Still~20K shorts  on bfx who will have to cover one way or another. So if we're gonna hit $275 anyway,why not push just a little more and set off that margin call cascade. We could see as high as $360 and then a no-brainer short all the way back down to the $230s.

Huge profit potential.  I think the whales are likely to do this with or without us. Might as well skim some cream. The only thing we have to worry about is $268 resistance that killed the rally on Feb 15.



2202. Post 10627969 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: jougR79 on March 02, 2015, 07:25:12 AM
Could someone working in an exchange confirm that they are seeing unusual amounts of deposits and demands of deposits ?

I predict 500$ by the 1st of May.

The premium I'm paying@ Circle and CB over BFX and Stamp, despite no fees suggests that there is indeed new money coming in and not just long leverage. 



2203. Post 10632447 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.01h):

Quote from: Tzupy on March 02, 2015, 04:01:18 PM
...
Anyone knows how many joules are tipically consumed today to create 1 valid block (25 BTC)?  
...

Assuming current market price is very close to electrical energy spent on mining, and price for that is a low 10 cents / kwh, I'm getting a guesstimate of ~227 GJ.

and how many joules are consumed by one Youtube video with a million views? How many by ALL youtube videos in one day?



2204. Post 10637462 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):


Quote


that's what i'm sayin ... if it has more than 1 bedroom , a kitchen , full bath , and is bluewater capable ... it's a yacht in my book ... those extra feet won't help you spear fish any better anyways Tongue

1 stateroom, a galley, full head

You obviously don't know shit about boats.
You have no business owning something when you can't even get the basic fucking nomenclature right.




2205. Post 10637582 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Raystonn on March 03, 2015, 02:18:38 AM
You have no business owning something when you can't even get the basic fucking nomenclature right.

I have sometimes wondered why txn_count is always 0.  Have you ever pondered what might happen in 2106 when the timestamp header field overflows?  Maybe we should hard fork now to fix that.

You understand the nomenclature, right?


You understand the word "basic"?



2206. Post 10637682 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: explorer on March 03, 2015, 02:23:43 AM

Quote


that's what i'm sayin ... if it has more than 1 bedroom , a kitchen , full bath , and is bluewater capable ... it's a yacht in my book ... those extra feet won't help you spear fish any better anyways Tongue

1 stateroom, a galley, full head

You obviously don't know shit about boats.
You have no business owning something when you can't even get the basic fucking nomenclature right.



Wow.  So I guess you have a perfect understanding (and grasp of nomenclature, of course) of everything you use/own/aspire to own.  Impressive.   Care to run down the nomenclature pertaining to the suspension and drive systems on your car? or the weave/stitching on your red neck T-shirt?  Or do you have no business owning it?  Lighten up.  Or crawl back in your bottle.  You are ever so much more entertaining when you are drunk.

again, "basic" is the relevant term. Because my truck is rear wheel drive, it has standard coil springs in front, leaf springs in back and shocks (not struts) all the way around. If someone wanted to operate my zoom machine with bounce cushions, I wouldn't give him my keys.

"basic", motherfuckers. I'm not criticizing him for inability to use a sextant or know the  difference between a ketch and a yawl. These are basic terms.



2207. Post 10637871 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Wary on March 03, 2015, 02:49:45 AM
Not M1. M2. Including long term savings accounts. I use my bitcoins as M2 today. Long term savings account. On a paper wallet  Wink
Not M2. M1. Money on savings accounts are lended by banks to somebody and put to their current accounts. So, M2=M1+IOU. Bitcoin will replace real money, rather than IOUs.  So, to calculate (maximal) future value of bitcoins we should use M1 or MB, rather than M2.

I think that's right. We are going to see more and more off blockchain type transactions such as me using my CB account to buy something on overstock. This effectively increases the money supply. It doesn't even have to be fraudulent. There is nothing to prevent fractional reserve bitcoin banks if consumers want them.

EDIT: on the positive side, this means that the transaction limits really only need to apply to settlements.



2208. Post 10638693 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Wary on March 03, 2015, 04:01:40 AM
Not M1. M2. Including long term savings accounts. I use my bitcoins as M2 today. Long term savings account. On a paper wallet  Wink
Not M2. M1. Money on savings accounts are lended by banks to somebody and put to their current accounts. So, M2=M1+IOU. Bitcoin will replace real money, rather than IOUs.  So, to calculate (maximal) future value of bitcoins we should use M1 or MB, rather than M2.

I think that's right. We are going to see more and more off blockchain type transactions such as me using my CB account to buy something on overstock. This effectively increases the money supply. It doesn't even have to be fraudulent. There is nothing to prevent fractional reserve bitcoin banks if consumers want them.
To sort this out, let's set definitions first. (You of course know most of the below, so can skip a paragraph or two Smiley).

M0 are paper bills. They are real money in a sense that one dollar bill cannot be in two places simultaneously. There is no fractional reserve banking with M0. M1 is M0+current accounts. M1 are more-less real money too. The amount of real money is MB, but M1 is a good approximation of it.

The money that sits on saving accounts are not real money, because they exist in two or more places simultaneously. A dollar that sits on your saving account is at the same time lended to somebody else and sits on their current account too. So, money on your saving account are not real money, but just promises to get real money and put them on your current account. We can say that M2 = M1+IOU.

We can make similar definition for bitcoin. Bitcoin's M1 are bitcoins that exist only in one place - in blockchain. BTCM1. Currently there are about 13,000,000 of them.

As you've correctly pointed out, there are also promises of bitcoin, that sits off-chain. So we can define BTCM2 = BTCM1 +BTCIOU.

The whole discussion was what will bitcoin cost if it'll replace fiat?

The suggested formula was:  bitcoin price = M2/BTCM1

I disagree with this formula. IMO, correct formula should be:

either bitcoin price = M1/BTCM1.
or      bitcoin price = M2/BTCM2.

Problem with the second formula, however is that currently we have no idea how big BTCIOU are going to be.

I see what you are saying, and the second formula is problematic. Maybe it would be more helpful to attack the problem from the other end. Something is only worth what someone is willing to trade for it. If Bitcoin replaces a given market or industry, then if the replacement industry stays the same size, bitcoin is worth whatever the disrupted industry was worth prior to disruption. You could make a partial valuation based on the market share Bitcoin takes from the legacy industry or market, and then divide that number by the number of bitcoins in existence. This value is ADDED to the value Bitcoin has for every other use, so:

The value of the reserve currency used for settlements, peer to peer transactions on the blockchain, remittances, micropayments, titles (colored coins), provably fair voting, PM type store of value, machine to machine (IoT), escrows, and most likely killer apps we haven't even thought of yet. Bitcoin has the potential not only to capture a significant chunk of Gross World Product, but to actually GROW GWP in ways it otherwise wouldn't grow just by increasing financial efficiency.



2209. Post 10639153 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

~18k shorts on BFX is a drop, but that's 18k coins that's 18k coins that have to be purchased. In the event of a short squeeze, this could easily push us over even $360 before a violent snap-back judging by the order book.

I do NOT want to see this kind of volatility, but it think the likelihood is above 50% now. If nobody dumps, unwinding those shorts could take out the entire visible order book and a good chunk of the hidden orders as well.

This rally needs to slow down.  If all short positions are force liquidated in a margin call cascade, there will be nothing to stop a free fall that will scare off BIT investors, VC infrastructure capital, and wider adoption in general.



2210. Post 10648726 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: mrkavasaki on March 03, 2015, 11:04:12 PM
you guys seriousy think the downtrend is over yet? Shocked


No, but this short squeeze still has legs. I expect a pull back before the final massive assault on $300 that I think will break through. once $300 resistance is broken, $360 is within reach.



2211. Post 10650780 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

12 hr chart on bfx is striped. Massive buying during the day in the west and dumping during daylight hours in China.  Four days in a row. two days before that it shows up again.

If this pattern continues, buying at night could generate FAST profits. Hold for 12 hrs, dump, buy backlower, rinse and repeat.



2212. Post 10650936 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: shmadz on March 04, 2015, 03:41:26 AM



I went to Somalia because I heard it was a libertarian utopia but all I found was (yet another) failed socialist state.

I have heard rumors of semi-autonomous zones being built on the coast of Honduras
(Sorry, no link, it was just an interview of some guy on some podcast, some time ago, but it definitely peaked my interest.)

It went to shit because Honduras gov't couldn't keep it's hands off. Predictable.



2213. Post 10661904 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Are we all waiting for after midnight to buy?



2214. Post 10662050 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 04, 2015, 11:20:23 PM
Are we all waiting for after midnight to buy?


Why after midnight?  Something to do with the auction?

Look at the 12 hr chart. it's striped red and green. Chinese dumping, then buying in the West.



2215. Post 10662478 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: aztecminer on March 04, 2015, 11:59:56 PM
Are we all waiting for after midnight to buy?


i'm waiting on the 'four punch raiders' and 'chinese panic' flash dump raids to buy moar. i thinking huobi could possibly have more bags to drop..... lol .

The Four Punch Pattern is at the short squeeze phase. You might make a profit picking up nickles in front on the train, but you might get flattened.



2216. Post 10662515 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

can we all just hold off on the buying until after the auction? The U.S. Marshals don't deserve our profits.



2217. Post 10663139 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 05, 2015, 01:43:17 AM
Are we all waiting for after midnight to buy?


i'm waiting on the 'four punch raiders' and 'chinese panic' flash dump raids to buy moar. i thinking huobi could possibly have more bags to drop..... lol .

The Four Punch Pattern is at the short squeeze phase. You might make a profit picking up nickles in front on the train, but you might get flattened.

I agree

Shorting right now is almost suicide

 Roll Eyes

almost.

sorry, but when people are calling short squeeze phase that means it is already over.

Don't be an ignorant fool. Look at the squeeze to $720, the squeeze to $475 and tell me it's over. Better yet, just go ahead and short. Please.



2218. Post 10663449 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 05, 2015, 02:13:02 AM
Are we all waiting for after midnight to buy?


i'm waiting on the 'four punch raiders' and 'chinese panic' flash dump raids to buy moar. i thinking huobi could possibly have more bags to drop..... lol .

The Four Punch Pattern is at the short squeeze phase. You might make a profit picking up nickles in front on the train, but you might get flattened.

I agree

Shorting right now is almost suicide

 Roll Eyes

almost.

sorry, but when people are calling short squeeze phase that means it is already over.

Don't be an ignorant fool. Look at the squeeze to $720, the squeeze to $475 and tell me it's over. Better yet, just go ahead and short. Please.


720...475?

what the fuck are you babbling about?

gtfo.

ok dipshit, I'll use small words: the short squeeze from $400 to $720 and the short squeeze from $340 to $475  both involved margin call cascades and rose over $130 from the bottoms. There is a spike. The $294 top was not a spike.



2219. Post 10663521 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 05, 2015, 02:39:23 AM
Are we all waiting for after midnight to buy?


i'm waiting on the 'four punch raiders' and 'chinese panic' flash dump raids to buy moar. i thinking huobi could possibly have more bags to drop..... lol .

The Four Punch Pattern is at the short squeeze phase. You might make a profit picking up nickles in front on the train, but you might get flattened.

I agree

Shorting right now is almost suicide

 Roll Eyes

almost.

sorry, but when people are calling short squeeze phase that means it is already over.

Don't be an ignorant fool. Look at the squeeze to $720, the squeeze to $475 and tell me it's over. Better yet, just go ahead and short. Please.


720...475?

what the fuck are you babbling about?

gtfo.

ok dipshit, I'll use small words: the short squeeze from $400 to $720 and the short squeeze from $340 to $475  both involved margin call cascades and rose over $130 from the bottoms. There is a spike. The $294 top was not a spike.



sorry to disappoint you but 294 $ top was a spike.

you better get used to small numbers bitcoiner, because you aint gonna see so big numbers or "cascades" like you used to any time soon.

I hope you're right. That kind of volatility is not good. You see, if you profit from day trading, you make bitcoin less volatile and make it more useful, even if you don't give a shit about the long term health of the project.  You don't have to believe in bitcoin to be a good decentral banker. Bitcoin doesn't need people like me to support it in order for it to succeed. The incentive structure makes it anti-fragile. 



2220. Post 10663976 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: mrkavasaki on March 05, 2015, 03:36:55 AM
Seriously guys, you think that $5k by 2016 Is possible?

It's very unlikely but possible. 7.5 billion people on the planet, 15 million Bitcoins.  O.2 %of the world's population would have to own an average of 1 BTC each. or 2% would need to own a tenth of a bitcoin each.
There's already ~ 5 million unique users, so adoption would have to triple for 0.2% or go up 30X for 2% adoption.

$5k/btc would give the distributed autonomous corporation Bitcoin a market cap of $75 Billion, roughly 1/10th of Apple's market cap.






2221. Post 10664239 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Bozuatle on March 05, 2015, 04:25:26 AM
Seriously guys, you think that $5k by end of 2016 Is possible?



 Smiley Smiley Smiley

I wrote that a long long time ago. 2011 I think. It's been quite a ride so far. The problem with being ahead of your time is that you never know when (if ever) the rest of the world will catch up.



2222. Post 10665193 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

This is the last major auction of Silk Road coins. After this, there will only be a few left so even if they end up getting dumped on the market, I think we go up after the auction.



2223. Post 10665523 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on March 05, 2015, 07:39:56 AM
This is the last major auction of Silk Road coins. After this, there will only be a few left so even if they end up getting dumped on the market, I think we go up after the auction.

44K is more than a few Roll Eyes

It's less than half of the 94K they have now.



2224. Post 10667918 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

So how do we know that some whale or whales weren't planning on buying 50K coins or more on the open market and instead are buying them at auction? In other words, How do we know that this sale isn't already priced into the market? It's not like this auction is a surprise or anything.



2225. Post 10667997 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on March 05, 2015, 01:11:02 PM
So how do we know that some whale or whales weren't planning on buying 50K coins or more on the open market and instead are buying them at auction? In other words, How do we know that this sale isn't already priced into the market? It's not like this auction is a surprise or anything.

Cherish this day: Coinbase will announce to openly buy Bitcoins with the VC money.

They don't have to do that nor should they. It doesn't mean they won't do that as that reckless "moon" stunt proved, but hopefully they can be more subtle. All they need to do is keep the btc they earn as fees in a reserve account and use the VC money to meet operating expenses. The effect is the same as buying bitcoins. (because they are not selling coins they otherwise would sell.)



2226. Post 10668135 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on March 05, 2015, 01:19:50 PM
So how do we know that some whale or whales weren't planning on buying 50K coins or more on the open market and instead are buying them at auction? In other words, How do we know that this sale isn't already priced into the market? It's not like this auction is a surprise or anything.

Cherish this day: Coinbase will announce to openly buy Bitcoins with the VC money.

They don't have to do that nor should they. It doesn't mean they won't do that as that reckless "moon" stunt proved, but hopefully they can be more subtle. All they need to do is keep the btc they earn as fees in a reserve account and use the VC money to meet operating expenses. The effect is the same as buying bitcoins. (because they are not selling coins they otherwise would sell.)

Operating expenses is not the same thing as paying out merchants who want cash.

of course it isn't the same. Who is saying it is? Who is saying they have any plans to cash out vendors with VC money?



2227. Post 10668332 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on March 05, 2015, 01:43:37 PM
So how do we know that some whale or whales weren't planning on buying 50K coins or more on the open market and instead are buying them at auction? In other words, How do we know that this sale isn't already priced into the market? It's not like this auction is a surprise or anything.

Cherish this day: Coinbase will announce to openly buy Bitcoins with the VC money.

They don't have to do that nor should they. It doesn't mean they won't do that as that reckless "moon" stunt proved, but hopefully they can be more subtle. All they need to do is keep the btc they earn as fees in a reserve account and use the VC money to meet operating expenses. The effect is the same as buying bitcoins. (because they are not selling coins they otherwise would sell.)

Operating expenses is not the same thing as paying out merchants who want cash.

of course it isn't the same. Who is saying it is? Who is saying they have any plans to cash out vendors with VC money?

I think there is a strong possibility. It's the obvious thing to do. Can even be part of their "business model"...

They need to spend that money getting licensed in the states they don't operate in yet.



2228. Post 10669411 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: thefunkybits on March 05, 2015, 03:24:25 PM
Didn't take too long for shorts to start piling back on  Cheesy

15K to 20K in less than 24 hours



excellent. /burnsvoice

the unwinding of those extra shorts is just what we need to break through $300 resistance.




2229. Post 10669594 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 05, 2015, 03:39:57 PM

excellent. /burnsvoice

the unwinding of those extra shorts is just what we need to break through $300 resistance.





sup bitch?

still talking about short squeeze? I left you there last night...

Good morning, tarmi. Nice to see you. It's so much more satisfying when I know who's money I'm taking.



2230. Post 10670124 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: okthen on March 05, 2015, 04:37:13 PM
when will be the auction concluded?

any news from the auction?

I doubt we'll have news today.
Last time it took some days to know who bought them.

it's all over after 1pm central standard time, 2 pm eastern. We're intentionally keeping the price down until then to deprive the USG of ill-gotten revenue.



2231. Post 10672482 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 05, 2015, 07:15:36 PM
http://www.rre.com/blog/90-why-we-started-abra
Quote
To design Abra we turned to the traditional Hawala model.  (...)  Traditional Hawala’s are generally illegal in the United States as no one is allowed to hold or remit funds on behalf of someone else without being a licensed money transmitter both with FinCen (the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) and with the US State regulators where the consumers’ reside.  In the case of Abra, however, consumers and Tellers are always holding their own money just as with the standard open source Bitcoin software.  Abra Tellers simply buy and sell digital currency directly to and from other consumers in their neighborhood in small amounts.

I am not a lawyer, but that explanation of why Abra is not a money transmitter is seems totally bogus.  When you use Western Union, you give your cash to one teller here, and another teller over there gives his cash to the other customer.  No cash is actually moving between the two locations, and there may not even be transfers between bank accounts.  Yet WU is definitely a money transmitter...

I agree in U.S. Law such a service is absolutely a money xmitter business, but what if the tellers are in the receiving country only? Anyone can legally buy bitcoin in the U.S. and send it to anyone they want (except drug dealers, terrorists, etc). Migrant worker remittances usually only flow one way: from the rich country to families in a poorer country.  It would be foolish for those poorer countries' governments to discourage a more efficient remittance option. It just sucks money out of their economy to do so.



2232. Post 10673371 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: bassclef on March 05, 2015, 09:31:20 PM
Auction price must have been higher than market.

Glad I added to my long at @$265.

Nice! I got in @ $270.



2233. Post 10674160 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: solitude on March 05, 2015, 10:43:11 PM
What's the deal with 95% of signatures being bullshit advertisement spam/scam sites?

Is the .000000001 BTC you receive to whore out your signature space really worth it?

Also, nobody cares you have a bitcoin address, nobody is going to send you any worthwhile amount if you leave it in your signature.



 
I got a few millibits. It's not the money. It's the feedback. Tips are a sincere way of telling someone you value their contribution.



2234. Post 10674503 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

That whole pump happened with no appreciable amount of short covering. it's as if they don't know that there are billions of dollars available to borrow to push the price up and only thousands of coins available to borrow to push the price down.

I was watching CNBC today and Mark Cuban was griping about all the VC money being "wasted" on tech start-ups.  The simple fact is that the 1% are loaded and looking for anything to invest in that is less overbought than stocks and bonds.  

He's right of course, but this "BTFD" in ANY asset class alpha-chasing buying spree will continue until the credit markets freeze up some time months or years from now. By then, Ukraine, Brazil, Venezuela, and a few other places may see the advantages of crypto as a capital control resistant hyperinflation hedge. BTW, the Euro hit a 12 year low today against the dollar. $1.09/EUR.




2235. Post 10674569 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: kodtycoon on March 05, 2015, 11:40:29 PM
$1.09/EUR.



damn.. good news for me.. Cheesy

It's gonna get worse...or better depending on your point of view. We're headed for parity.



2236. Post 10674675 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on March 05, 2015, 11:50:02 PM
Covered my short from the 280's, off to bed without any btc alarms set tonight  Grin.  Tomorrow will look for another long entry. GL!

Good call! Goodnight.



2237. Post 10675276 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: YourMother on March 06, 2015, 12:32:28 AM
Laughable how this dumb scared whale(s) is constantly buying so the positive momentum could continue. If you look at the chart, the price wants to plunge into the shitter and everytime it does that for a longer period, you see these sudden bursts...



Somebody is about to lose a shit ton of money.

Yeah, it's bears gonna get burned. We know you're upside down on your shorts. We even gave you a chance to get out cheap today, but you got greedy. Now You gonna pay, Beyotch.



2238. Post 10675381 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: alesx.onfire on March 06, 2015, 01:27:57 AM
why everybody are dumping Huh?
what's the reason??..

just was a simple chinese pump?

It's just profit taking. People are taking advantage of the 24 hr cycle to make  a quick ~$5 profit in the daily churn.



2239. Post 10676117 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: shmadz on March 06, 2015, 02:55:53 AM
Sorry,  " 97 new replies have been posted. "  right... Apparently I should review my post,

but I won't.    Thus completely out of context, but, just some short thoughts:

I've been thinking about a change. -not that I don't like where I live, I'm just afraid of my government and the policies of my national neighbors.

So I'm looking to take a trip, to visit some hopeful alternatives, and hoping that bitcoin will be accepted, if not directly, then at least easily exchangeable for local fiat.

And that is what got me thinking... What I really want, is to find a place where as many people as possible understand what bitcoin is about, and go there.

...

Is there such a place already? Or do we need to just build it ourselves?

I guess I'm proposing a 'bitcoin nation' and I'll just leave this post as open invitation to the first nation that not only accepts bitcoin for payment of debt, but also --

This new bitcoin nation must also use only bitcoin to pay government employees, and all departments should have their addresses publicly known. Because they are 'public servants' after all, they should provide proper accounting for all public expenditure.

This is not to say that public employees should not have private salaries, separate from their public expenditures.This could be done by publicly listing the total yearly expenditure on salary, and each employees' total, and just mach up the totals. only the total salary of every public servant should be public knowledge, what they spend it on is their own business. By mixing the outputs to all government employees, you could still know the expected total, without knowing which address is whose.


Ok, not so short thoughts, maybe should clip for a topic, maybe just dumb idea.

So tired. Sleep now.

It doesn't work like that. Bitcoin as legal tender would be terrible. Legal tender laws are incompatible with monetary freedom. I don't want to substitute one form of fiat for another.  Say's Law: bad money drives out good. There would be crippling deflation.



2240. Post 10676154 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: DaRude on March 06, 2015, 03:48:27 AM
Ah the longs are up almost 1MM over 19MM again that explains the last bump. Either someone knows something no one else does, or someone is rolling a dice big time

You don't know? Are you paying attention?



2241. Post 10676199 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: DaRude on March 06, 2015, 03:56:55 AM
Ah the longs are up almost 1MM over 19MM again that explains the last bump. Either someone knows something no one else does, or someone is rolling a dice big time

You don't know? Are you paying attention?

I do have a life outside this thread don't wanna end up like Adam

Adam may get the last laugh on all of us.



2242. Post 10676984 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on March 06, 2015, 06:27:00 AM
Looking for a long position in low 270s.

We're in the low 270s



2243. Post 10677107 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on March 06, 2015, 06:46:10 AM
Looking for a long position in low 270s.

We're in the low 270s

juuuussst a bit lower. Waiting to see if we get one more push down. I'm a miser  Cheesy

one of these days getting greedy is gonna bite you in the ass, but for now, looks like a good call.



2244. Post 10681976 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: Andre# on March 06, 2015, 04:51:56 PM
Remember when U.S. Americans were so envious of Europeans who were able to visit the States so cheaply but it was so expensive to visit Europe? Europeans hopefully have a lot of good vacation photos by now. Memories to last a lifetime!

But Mercs, Porshes and Ferraris will be a lot cheaper now. As long as you buy more of them, Im sure Europeans wont mind too much!!

This.
EU will export a lot more now since stuff like that will become cheaper for others. On the other side import will go down - more spending for products made in EU. Tourist will also get more for their money in EU... Time will tell if this is positive or not  Wink

It means that Eurozone people will have to work harder for the rest of the world.


Wrong. What it means is that Europe hasn't been working as hard as the rest of the world and now they will have to. In a debt-based economy, you get the benefits before you pay the bill.



2245. Post 10682053 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: macsga on March 06, 2015, 05:11:38 PM
Remember when U.S. Americans were so envious of Europeans who were able to visit the States so cheaply but it was so expensive to visit Europe? Europeans hopefully have a lot of good vacation photos by now. Memories to last a lifetime!

But Mercs, Porshes and Ferraris will be a lot cheaper now. As long as you buy more of them, Im sure Europeans wont mind too much!!

This.
EU will export a lot more now since stuff like that will become cheaper for others. On the other side import will go down - more spending for products made in EU. Tourist will also get more for their money in EU... Time will tell if this is positive or not  Wink

It means that Eurozone people will have to work harder for the rest of the world.


Wrong. What it means is that Europe hasn't been working as hard as the rest of the world and now they will have to. In a debt-based economy, you get the benefits before you pay the bill.

Exactly. But is it not the same everywhere? How's that different for instance, in Singapore, Australia, or Zimbabwe to name a few... I'm not mentioning the US of A because someone might be pissed a bit off... Roll Eyes

Yes it is the same everywhere and especially here in the USA. We will pay last and most.



2246. Post 10682217 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: Brewins on March 06, 2015, 05:14:05 PM
gold and silver crash..... btc stable


stable, after crashing 70%+ in 2014

and rising 5,000% the year before that.



2247. Post 10684497 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on March 06, 2015, 08:56:09 PM
For anyone attempting to trade on Bitfinex right now:

Need help? United States:
1 (800) 273-8255
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline
Hours: 24 hours, 7 days a week
Languages: English, Spanish
Website: www.suicidepreventionlifeline.org



Suicide? I just closed out of a 20 coin margin long and made 2%- should I want to kill myself for not making MOAR?

It does kinda piss me off that we had almost a complete fucking retracement from $284.99 yesterday. The higher low is the only thing that gives me hope.  Now we have to survive the weekend dumpfest and I only have my 2% to trade with instead of the 5% I would have had selling at the top.



2248. Post 10684775 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: razorramon on March 06, 2015, 10:09:10 PM
Pump weekend? Again? Smiley

You call this a pump? we're $10 lower than 24 hrs ago.  We have to go sideways until Sunday night to get a pump now and that's not bloody likely.  The people who sold at $284 will prolly get some bargains.




2249. Post 10684809 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on March 06, 2015, 10:22:30 PM

Bullish, I think Silbert would have put in pretty solid bids. He was outbid.

p.s. great find, thanks!


Edit: oops Silbert is not CEO of secondmarket any longer. Nevertheless, secondmarket Inc. still owns BIT which just opened the OTC market. I thought they would be bidding solid for these coins.

2nd Market would have held those coins. For all we know the winner's gonna dump for a fast profit. We had a chance to burn the margin shorts and the damn Chinese dumpmonkeys fucked it up. Only thing Chinks are good for is making cheap stuff and selling it. They can't trade for shit.



2250. Post 10684948 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on March 06, 2015, 10:46:18 PM
... Only thing Chinks are good for is making cheap stuff and selling it. They can't trade for shit.

Jewed you out of some some profits tho Undecided

I read the market wrong. I thought yesterday's pump was a bear trap, but it was just a correction from oversold conditions. I'd rather be trading with Jews. At least the Hymies know how to make money. These yellow fuckers are just mining now and dumping at spot. look at the 12 HR chart. Endless selling on Shanghai time. We're gonna take all their coins and leave them back in the 12th century where they seem to be comfortable.



2251. Post 10684966 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: darkmind on March 06, 2015, 10:53:57 PM
I guess we're gonna be in uptrend, look at the chart here on this page. it is a perfect head and shoulders, this is going to the core, what do you guys think?

It's not a head and shoulders yet. Neckline is not complete. If it does complete, it means trend reversal and I'm going to dump myself.

It kind of looks like batman's retarded brother H & S.



2252. Post 10685019 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 06, 2015, 10:53:51 PM

Bullish, I think Silbert would have put in pretty solid bids. He was outbid.

p.s. great find, thanks!


Edit: oops Silbert is not CEO of secondmarket any longer. Nevertheless, secondmarket Inc. still owns BIT which just opened the OTC market. I thought they would be bidding solid for these coins.

2nd Market would have held those coins. For all we know the winner's gonna dump for a fast profit. We had a chance to burn the margin shorts and the damn Chinese dumpmonkeys fucked it up. Only thing Chinks are good for is making cheap stuff and selling it. They can't trade for shit.


you are a fucking disgrace with those racist rants.  

I hope I dumped my coins on you and took profits from you.


You may have taken some of my profits but I got a piece of it.  Are you the PC police? You're gonna be fun. I'm not really racist. Me and my Spic and Negro buddies go out and bash fags together.

Oh Noooz. Somebody got OFFENDED on the Internet!

EDIT: I apologize. That was out of line. I'm just in a bad mood. Just get some thick skin, will ya?



2253. Post 10685081 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on March 06, 2015, 11:05:01 PM
... Only thing Chinks are good for is making cheap stuff and selling it. They can't trade for shit.

Jewed you out of some some profits tho Undecided

I read the market wrong. I thought yesterday's pump was a bear trap, but it was just a correction from oversold conditions. I'd rather be trading with Jews. At least the Hymies know how to make money. These yellow fuckers are just mining now and dumping at spot. look at the 12 HR chart. Endless selling on Shanghai time. We're gonna take all their coins and leave them back in the 12th century where they seem to be comfortable.

You didnt read it wrong. You just cant read it, full stop.

You really need help, dude.

You don't know shit, Newbie.  I'm up over 40% this year, over 3000% last five years. I'm just pissed because I should have done much much better.



2254. Post 10685170 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Blowing bubbles does not help Bitcoin. I wish I'd never see another bubble. A slow, steady rise is ideal.  MOMO traders just gamble and increase volatility so we, the decentral bankers of Bitcoin, have to eat it. It's actually a pretty easy way to make money if you don't get too greedy, but every time we succeed, we draw in another crowd of gamblers. I'll prolly be doing this for the rest of my life. I need a BJA bot so I can take a vacation.



2255. Post 10685212 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: coinableS on March 06, 2015, 11:21:52 PM
I guess we're gonna be in uptrend, look at the chart here on this page. it is a perfect head and shoulders, this is going to the core, what do you guys think?

It's not a head and shoulders yet. Neckline is not complete. If it does complete, it means trend reversal and I'm going to dump myself.

It kind of looks like batman's retarded brother H & S.

The only head and shoulders I see is the big upside down H&S on the 2 hr chart.
Bullish  Cool

I don't see it but I hope you're right, Brother.



2256. Post 10685316 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: inca on March 06, 2015, 11:24:56 PM
Who do you think was mostly responsible for the $1200 pump? Yep, China and a bot from Japan.
Your shitcoin's biggest pump ever was brought to you by "yellow fuckers", now what?

Were you whining about that too?

I see the trolls are back out to play.

I would love to hear your positions..short from where? How long before you do a Houdini again NHJT?


I have that guy on "ignore".  The Chinese were never value investors with a few important exceptions.  They just love to gamble. Macau now dwarfs Vegas as the gambling capital of the world. They'll jump back in soon enough when the credit markets dry up and everybody starts talking about capital controls.




2257. Post 10685680 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: Hfertig on March 07, 2015, 12:01:36 AM
...I'm up over ... 3000% last five years. I'm just pissed because I should have done much much better.

3000% in 5 years?  Let's see, a $20 pizza was sold for 10,000 BTC back then...  So you've lost most of your coin?  No shit you "should have done much better." Cheesy

He is either a liar or very bad at maths. On the 17 th of Feb he stated his average buying price is 85 USD...

I have a trading stash and cold storage. I don't take profits from cold storage, which had a buy-in of $9/btc.
That's my retirement.

My trading account has lost money in USD terms, but I have increased my BTC count substantially. Kinda sucks, but I'm still learning.





2258. Post 10685908 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on March 07, 2015, 12:26:16 AM
Someone trying to push the price with a 400 btc buy order at bitfinex?

It's very difficult to push price in the direction you want it to go.  You have to drive the bid and ask sums more than the price so you can minimize slippage when you take profits.  The profits are often less than the cost of pushing the price. You can sometimes trick the market with fake walls, but that can backfire if someone takes a big bite out of your wall before you can pull it.

A whale with the right skill could almost print money with minimal risk, but if you run into another whale, he could take you out. For us minnows, the ideal situation is competing whales that we can skim off of, trading the churn.



2259. Post 10686032 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: camolist on March 07, 2015, 12:57:19 AM
lowered my margin buy by 25 btc (back to 150 i had added 25 in the low 60s) not sure where we are going short term  Cool

I did something similar for the same reason. Maybe we'll get another Saturday Night discount.



2260. Post 10686220 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):




2261. Post 10694489 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on March 07, 2015, 08:01:39 PM
Bears are confident even though the price is rising. Perfect time to reck their shorts and move on without them.

Time is on our side not for technical reasons but for fundamental reasons. Sideways means up due to the US dollar strengthening against all other fiat currencies. All we have to do is HODL and the entire world can dog-pile into btc as an inflation hedge.




2262. Post 10695568 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: Hfertig on March 07, 2015, 10:17:13 PM
There are about 4M$ new longs since the start of this rally (~240$ some 10 days ago), this means about 15k BTC will have to be sold if the rally ends, just to cover those longs.

And 50000 coins from the auction which will only settle on monday. I guess they were bought at a discount to the current price. Lets see how long this will be a discount

so the short term outcome most likely is a dump?

Anyway I doubt BTC will visit the lower levels from the start of the year.

tbh... I don't know, but I would not be surprised of it. I am repeating myself, but there is another auction and the Gox liquidation which currently appear to happen this year.

The Gox thing is not exactly an auction. It will be Gox giving back some of the customer's BTC/money.

Considering that there is still no hint about how the owned amount will be calculated, I think anything that we are taking very late in this year

you are right this is not an auction. But it will surely create supply. I know what I am going to do with the coins distributed to me... no matter how high the payout will be.

I'm afraid you're likely to get very little if anything back.The lawyers will get paid first and if they get paid in bitcoin, they will sell immediately.  Karpeles fucked everybody and I hope he dies painfully.



2263. Post 10698011 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

wHERE'S MY MOTHERFUCKING sATURDAY NIGHT DISCOUNT?? 



2264. Post 10703938 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: Iraes78 on March 08, 2015, 06:46:54 PM
We are going to the moon guys



Its a secret technical analysis shown decades ago by ancient monks in my stay in Tibet, and there is no fucking doubt about, next station : between moon and Mars.

BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC

Dwarf planet Ceres in the asteroid belt?



2265. Post 10705420 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: inca on March 08, 2015, 09:29:51 PM
Just bought a few more coins. Expect a sudden price drop.  Grin

Wrong time of day, Bro. look at the 12 HR chart. Buy after midnight UTC and SELL this time of day for as long as the pattern continues. 



2266. Post 10705478 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on March 08, 2015, 09:41:05 PM
Traders seem to be programmed to sell every little spike atm. Too predictable!

Yeah but they're buying every little dip too!



2267. Post 10705612 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: dreamspark on March 08, 2015, 09:53:10 PM
Traders seem to be programmed to sell every little spike atm. Too predictable!

Yeah but they're buying every little dip too!

I'm trying my best to be bullish, which I am long term (ie I think 160 was the bottom)  but just look at this. 

http://bfxdata.com/sentiment/longshort.php

No way Mr Market Maker is gonna stand for that.

If $160 was the bottom, then it would be foolish to sell. Just wait for price to drop and add to long position. That's what we all seem to be doing, which is why it's not dropping.



2268. Post 10706125 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: zoinky on March 08, 2015, 11:05:24 PM
More up soon.


I think it's likely. At $275, One million people can buy more than the 3600 coins/day mined by spending less than $1 each. 



2269. Post 10706567 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: inca on March 08, 2015, 10:30:17 PM
Just bought a few more coins. Expect a sudden price drop.  Grin

Wrong time of day, Bro. look at the 12 HR chart. Buy after midnight UTC and SELL this time of day for as long as the pattern continues. 

Day trading is for gamblers. These coins go from circle to my cold storage. Smiley

Day trading if done well provides liquidity and reduces volatility. Good day traders are vital to the proper functioning of the system.



2270. Post 10716750 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: noobtrader on March 09, 2015, 01:35:02 PM
i think the price will stay 275-285 for few month...



NOPE



2271. Post 10717084 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: dreamspark on March 09, 2015, 09:02:24 PM
i think the price will stay 275-285 for few month...



NOPE

Have you traded futures yet bja? Moves like today can make your mortgage payment for 6 months in 5 minutes.

Not yet. I'm not convinced the bear market is over yet, but I did make profits (on paper) equivalent to almost six months mortgage today, but I'm letting most of it ride. Paid myself a grand and keeping the rest rolling.




2272. Post 10717705 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: michaelGedi on March 09, 2015, 09:55:37 PM

someone want me to use their referral code on bitfinex?

use the guy who does bfxdata.com he deserves it

UttOzlC1zZ



2273. Post 10717796 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: hdbuck on March 09, 2015, 10:21:49 PM
bids getting thinner and thinner.. longs prepare for the squeeze.

No, it's just those of us who have been ignoring your faulty predictions taking a little profit as a reward for not listening to you.

Both Stamp and BFX topped the Mar 3 high so we're going on up.



2274. Post 10720486 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: damiano on March 10, 2015, 03:57:52 AM
I don't think 300 is coming tonight

I'm thinking maybe tomorrow or Wednesday.




2275. Post 10720605 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: byronbb on March 10, 2015, 04:30:07 AM
Wow, how is the finex price 7 dollar higher than stamp. Never seen it being higher than 2$ before . 7$ is a big opportunity for arbitraging


Because someone has plunked a 7k wall up to $300 on stamp.

Whoever it is is not a sophisticated trader or he would have walls on multiple exchanges. losing $5/coin selling on Stamp is costing him at least $35,000 for that wall.



2276. Post 10721097 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: simmo77 on March 10, 2015, 06:15:48 AM

I'm bullish.

Merely pointing out that "by Summer" means 2 different dates, depending on which hemisphere you live in.

The one that has the vast majority of land mass. You Southies are just gonna have to adapt like left-handed people do. Unimportant people would get along much better if they knew how unimportant they are.



2277. Post 10723880 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on March 10, 2015, 11:52:51 AM
Winklevii Interview

http://uk.businessinsider.com/winklevoss-twins-bitcoin-will-dominate-global-finance-2015-3?r=US

On Gemini:
Quote
The exchange is also partnering with a major, yet-to-be announced US bank.

could it be JPM chase???

The name is less important than whether or not I can get an account there for instant purchases in volume. If it is a commercial bank such as SVB that CB uses, then no.



2278. Post 10726043 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

No fucking way $300 is the top. This rally has legs.  I've seen a shitload of tops and they don't look like this.
There is still much money to be made.



2279. Post 10726137 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: BlackSpidy on March 10, 2015, 03:33:13 PM
No fucking way $300 is the top. This rally has legs.  I've seen a shitload of tops and they don't look like this.
There is still much money to be made.

Where do you think this next top is?

Somewhere between $340 and $360, but it prolly won't go str8 up. The smart and the lucky will be buying dips and selling peeks the whole way up.



2280. Post 10726541 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: ardana123 on March 10, 2015, 03:38:47 PM
Why exactly is Bitcoin rallying? Nothing has changed.

Incremental changes have a cumulative effect. Ukraine, Greece, Euro weakness, South America, remittances, regulated exchanges and ETFs, Paypal support, Bitpesa, messaging apps, etc etc.


The rally has solid momentum now, so nothing changing means UP.



2281. Post 10727038 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: KryptoFoo on March 10, 2015, 03:59:49 PM
Put in some low bids around 291. Who the hell knows if we see $300 or $290 next, in fact we could have both within the hour the way things are going.

I did the same. I see it pretty much the same way.




2282. Post 10727076 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: madmat on March 10, 2015, 04:50:56 PM
I just bought some coins now and it felt so great Smiley i hope it won't be like always when i bought coins, we went down a lot...maybe this time we go up guys? Pretty please? Smiley

Buy high, sell low!  Grin

Seriously, you buy after 10 days of continuous rise. Risk is big that we go down now.

You're a motherfucking liar. we've had red candles 3 out of the last seven days. This is a steady rise, not parabolic.



2283. Post 10727201 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: madmat on March 10, 2015, 05:01:55 PM
I just bought some coins now and it felt so great Smiley i hope it won't be like always when i bought coins, we went down a lot...maybe this time we go up guys? Pretty please? Smiley

Buy high, sell low!  Grin

Seriously, you buy after 10 days of continuous rise. Risk is big that we go down now.

You're a motherfucking liar. we've had red candles 3 out of the last seven days. This is a steady rise, not parabolic.

I love you too.

Daily chart clearly proves you wrong on every major exchange. 10 days? That's not just inaccurate; it's misleading and deceptive.  Care to retract your bullshit statement?



2284. Post 10727280 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: inca on March 10, 2015, 05:07:10 PM
I think stamp is dying..

Or maybe Europe is dying and Stamp is going down with it.



2285. Post 10727893 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

300!!



2286. Post 10728116 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: madmat on March 10, 2015, 05:58:34 PM
I just bought some coins now and it felt so great Smiley i hope it won't be like always when i bought coins, we went down a lot...maybe this time we go up guys? Pretty please? Smiley

Buy high, sell low!  Grin

Seriously, you buy after 10 days of continuous rise. Risk is big that we go down now.

You're a motherfucking liar. we've had red candles 3 out of the last seven days. This is a steady rise, not parabolic.

I love you too.

Daily chart clearly proves you wrong on every major exchange. 10 days? That's not just inaccurate; it's misleading and deceptive.  Care to retract your bullshit statement?

Relax man. Take a deep breath. Go out for a little walk, and when your stress is down, just look at the charts again. Price was 254 ten days ago and 240 12 days ago. So yes, it was not a perfect ramp up, but it is an impressive pump and buying today is not that smart.

Oh, fuck off.
That's not saying the same thing. You made a very specific claim that was clearly false. Making a similar claim now does not erase the bald fucking lie you made earlier, so you need to retract it and apologize or resign yourself to having no credibility.

I'll relax when you stop lying, asshole. Did we or did we not have red candles three of the last seven days?  answer the fucking question, admit you spewed bullshit, and we can discuss whether or not price rose too quickly. I'm not going to give you slack. Your bullshit is costing people money.





2287. Post 10730201 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Just bought back part of what I sodl.  Churn is better than moon. I can buy same coins over and over without paying more!!



2288. Post 10730278 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 10, 2015, 09:35:17 PM
all I can see are some frustrate bulls not being able to reach 320 and close their longs on some suckers.

I am cool.


We are far from frustrated. It usually takes more than a couple of weeks to get a 40% profit. Everything is going according to plan. 



2289. Post 10730396 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

USD swap rates getting stupid expensive on BFX.  It's cheaper to use credit cards and buy @ Circle now.



2290. Post 10730419 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: empowering on March 10, 2015, 09:50:54 PM
all I can see are some frustrate bulls not being able to reach 320 and close their longs on some suckers.

I am cool.


We are far from frustrated. It usually takes more than a couple of weeks to get a 40% profit. Everything is going according to plan.  


there is no "we".

there is no "plan".

only you delusional fuck.


Take a seat...



LOL The butthurt is strong in this one.



2291. Post 10730440 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: aztecminer on March 10, 2015, 09:53:04 PM
Loaded is a multimillionaire. And so are his friends and investors. If you think he can't push up the price because he already has tons of bitcoins, and all of his and his friends money are already in bitcoin, then you are dumb.

We are moving up so fucking deal with it, and quit trying to make an excuse for every bit of good news just because you shorted or sold at the bottom.

lol angry bagholders dont want their moment of euphoria ruined. like i said, last time he came and winked all of you delusional bulls did the same thing.

You and tarmi are sounding increasingly worried..

Worried about what, exactly?

The price rising further obviously.





i'm getting my 'beartroll' suit on right now....... ya all should known by now ya gonna get dumped on again ....

Let it rain. What good is a forty thousand dollar tradable balance that doesn't get used?



2292. Post 10732103 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.03h):

Quote from: 12345mm on March 11, 2015, 01:07:12 AM
so basically ... what i gather from the talk of usd swaps and btc swaps and % used and % held and such ... is that there is more demand for btc than money being offered to lend to spend on btc ? right? ... so more or less people cannot buy enough of btc with their own money / are already all in with their non-leveraged fiat and doing everything they can to buy the hell out of it more ? ... meanwhile 3600 produced a day at 290 a pop comes out riiiiight about at 1M needing to be bought daily in fiat dollar terms ? ... honestly i don't know quite what to make of that ... but with 1 million estimated bitcoin users , we basically all need to drop $1 a day on average to consume the supply all other speculative buying/selling being equal ? ... doesn't sound bad ... hmmmm ... sounds like rabid demand vs minimal supply when averaged across all involved parties , just with limited/inadequate capital being provided by lenders ?

There's one important thing to remember and that is that Finex is not the whole market. Longs are over extended on Finex yes but it only takes say 4 million of new money to let the extended longs close into it. On okcoin for example there are more shorts out.

well right ... yeah ... i mean that obviously makes sense of course it's not the whole market but is a good indicator yeah? ... meanwhile ultimately every btc being offered to lend is btc that is expected to be paid back , and basically represents btc held for future and not btc that *actually* wants to be sold ? ... it's just btc being offered with an expected % return but really being held long term ? ... definitely hard to wrap one's head around the whole lending mess ... but it seems like overall all of the btc being offered for swaps is bullish long term and all the usd being offered for swaps is ambivalent and just looking for some fiat % gain and that demand for usd loaned is greater than usd being offered ? ... so there's a lending demand that's not being satisfied ?

At some point, there will be enough demand and high USD swap fees that people will send fiat to stamp only to lend it out.  This will likely continue until interest rates drop so far that lending USD is no longer attractive. THEN, there will be more USD on the exchange than coins to buy with it, a situation ripe for a major jump.



2293. Post 10735165 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: macsga on March 11, 2015, 09:41:26 AM

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/FX:EURUSD/

EUR seems to be suffering a horrible death... Undecided

EUR/USD$1.05!!!  Parity inbound!  All you Europeans, Yer-a-peein' on your currency.



2294. Post 10735295 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: paul2000 on March 11, 2015, 10:08:31 AM

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/FX:EURUSD/

EUR seems to be suffering a horrible death... Undecided

EUR/USD$1.05!!!  Parity inbound!  All you Europeans, Yer-a-peein' on your currency.


No problem sir, because EUR/BTC is even more on the rise and with parity, calculation is not needed anymore  Grin Tongue

in Euro terms, Kraken is higher than the CB top! 



2295. Post 10735352 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Continentals, listen up. Risk free* trade:

1. Buy BTC  in Euros on Stamp and Kraken
2. send BTC to BFX in Hongkong (takes ~ 30 min)
3. Sell for USD
4. Lend out USD for ~40% annual interest (that's what I'm getting)

BOOM! You're hedged against Euro devaluation AND getting a nice vig


* obviously there is risk in any trade



2296. Post 10735693 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: thebitcoinquiz.com on March 11, 2015, 10:33:35 AM
Continentals, listen up. Risk free* trade:

1. Buy BTC  in Euros on Stamp and Kraken
2. send BTC to BFX in Hongkong (takes ~ 30 min)
3. Sell for USD
4. Lend out USD for ~40% annual interest (that's what I'm getting)

BOOM! You're hedged against Euro devaluation AND getting a nice vig


* obviously there is risk in any trade
Where are you getting 40% interest on lending USD? And how?

on Bitfinex, go to "Total Return Swaps" page, offer USD swaps.  I'm currently getting 0.117% daily interest, which translates to (365 day in a year) 42.7% annual interest. Of course it may be higher because interest is compounded, but may be lower as the contracts are for 30 days or less and I may not get so much in the future. (I may get moar!)



2297. Post 10736205 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 11, 2015, 12:06:29 PM

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/FX:EURUSD/

EUR seems to be suffering a horrible death... Undecided

EUR/USD$1.05!!!  Parity inbound!  All you Europeans, Yer-a-peein' on your currency.


It's about time the stuck up ECB did something other than sit on their hands. Now it's the turn of the americans and chinese to buy our artificially under priced goods for a couple of decades.

Absolutely! Of course you'll let us buy on credit, right? (because that worked out so well with Greece)



2298. Post 10736754 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 11, 2015, 12:14:34 PM

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/FX:EURUSD/

EUR seems to be suffering a horrible death... Undecided

EUR/USD$1.05!!!  Parity inbound!  All you Europeans, Yer-a-peein' on your currency.


It's about time the stuck up ECB did something other than sit on their hands. Now it's the turn of the americans and chinese to buy our artificially under priced goods for a couple of decades.

Absolutely! Of course you'll let us buy on credit, right? (because that worked out so well with Greece)

You'll have to join the Euro. I would love to see Fox News go apeshit if that happened.

You can't even get Sweden, Switzerland, the UK or Iceland to join, so why the hell would we? Eurodollars are effectively loans we take out and never have to pay back, so no thanks.  We may not be able to export much anymore, but we can and do export inflation  Grin



2299. Post 10737742 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: gonedoggo on March 11, 2015, 02:30:35 PM
/snip
It always had been. The only reason we need to use fiat is, without them, we cannot get BTC currently as what might valuate it?

I unno....Goods and Services?

And everything that has a price

In the future, everything will trade against everything else. That's a good thing. I see an arbitrage bot arms race in the making.  

1HR moving average turning green.



2300. Post 10738169 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

This cracks me up.

 BTC is up, doomer cry "UP too fast, it's gonna crash!"

BTC goes sideways, doomers cry "it's hitting stall speed. It's gonna crash!



2301. Post 10739760 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: byronbb on March 11, 2015, 04:57:08 PM
Tastes like a breakout is coming.

We'll who is buying the 7k wall @300 on bitstamp? I left my last 2 million in my other pants.

When we're @ $305 on BFX, Stampers will get brave. 2 mil in a 5 Billion dollar market is not much.
7K is formidable, but not even close to impregnable. We busted through a 27K wall at exactly that same price a few months ago.



2302. Post 10743722 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on March 11, 2015, 11:31:18 PM
Who's gonna be the first to take us back up over 300?  Stamp? Finex? China??

Localbitcoins is already over $300



2303. Post 10751178 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: hdbuck on March 12, 2015, 04:14:11 PM


Do you think Arnie wore underpants in Commando?



2304. Post 10761819 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: octaft on March 13, 2015, 01:46:30 PM
There is no such thing as a "successful" trader. There are traders who may go well one day and bad at another. Whoever claims for his/her error-less abilities he/she may as well claim the title of the bigger liar as well. I personally suck at trading. I must classify myself to the worst trader around; that's why I'm a perma-hodler ever since. Smiley

Well yeah, anyone who claims to never have been wrong is obviously FOS, but you can be wrong sometimes and still make profit. It's all about making more when you're right than you lose when you're wrong.

Thanks for the suggestions. Yep, TERA is a she. She was consistently bearish, but as I remember mostly right. It was a bearish year and no one wanted to hear it. As I recall she found trading bitcoin pretty stressful though.

AFAIK TERA never divulged their gender, and them being a she was based off of some sexist bullshit BJA came up with. Big shock there, I know.

She had brains and skill.  I miss her contributions to the thread.



2305. Post 10761902 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: michaelGedi on March 13, 2015, 02:44:26 PM
Chessnut gets more wrong than right.

I enjoy reading his analyses, and he seems to know EW really well. However, you're correct.

do you have data on his success/failures? or just based on looking at his posts?  Wink

I have no idea, but he is a trader to talk to on these forums at the very least


EDIT, oh and don't forget billyjoeallen, he claims he's up 60% this year   Shocked

No I don't. I'm doing pretty well, but not that good.



2306. Post 10762033 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 13, 2015, 03:16:24 PM
no, it's not a win win because a lot of ammo was spent for 4 attempts to break 300.

lot of usd swaps opened in the process, no cheap dolla' on bitfinex...

coins from auction went for a good price.

hidden bearish divergence showing up.

usd going ballistic.

but keep repeating that everything is ok, because I am ok with it.  Cool

Can't believe I'm saying this but I'm starting to agree with Tarmi. We've lost the momentum. Breakout that I was expecting should have happened by now. I'm still long but not leveraged long.



2307. Post 10762219 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: octaft on March 13, 2015, 03:35:23 PM
There is no such thing as a "successful" trader. There are traders who may go well one day and bad at another. Whoever claims for his/her error-less abilities he/she may as well claim the title of the bigger liar as well. I personally suck at trading. I must classify myself to the worst trader around; that's why I'm a perma-hodler ever since. Smiley

Well yeah, anyone who claims to never have been wrong is obviously FOS, but you can be wrong sometimes and still make profit. It's all about making more when you're right than you lose when you're wrong.

Thanks for the suggestions. Yep, TERA is a she. She was consistently bearish, but as I remember mostly right. It was a bearish year and no one wanted to hear it. As I recall she found trading bitcoin pretty stressful though.

AFAIK TERA never divulged their gender, and them being a she was based off of some sexist bullshit BJA came up with. Big shock there, I know.

She had brains and skill.  I miss her contributions to the thread.

Oh man if I weren't so lazy, I would find that old post where you said they "trade like a woman," with the clear implication being that they are a coward.

So much respect there.  Roll Eyes

Over time, she earned my respect- something you have still yet to do yourself.



2308. Post 10807060 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: macsga on March 17, 2015, 10:19:08 PM


cos that's how we all live our lives, in a perpetual state of social networked paradise...  Roll Eyes

Idk. Looks quite sad. He's texting to himself.

I concur. FB could have done it waaaaay better than this. I guess there's always time for a small change... Wink

BTW:
It's getting really boring in here. The pumps are so weak, the dips are weaker. It's not the time for trading, I guess traders must be having an awful time this time of year. BTW, serious question: Anyone here really into this buy/sell game under these circumstances?

I like boring. It means we have done our jobs.



2309. Post 10848716 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

I have very reasonable bids on 22 coins with no bear takers.What gives? Where's my weekend discount?



2310. Post 10870983 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

This is a bag of suck. Black market drug money must be getting mixed and dumped.



2311. Post 10888844 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Am I the only asshole who got caught in a long position >$260?  I mean it's not a leveraged long and I do have a little cash left, but damn.  It only takes $900,000/day net to support this price level. Assuming 1 million bitcoin bulls, that's less than a buck/day each.




2312. Post 10901773 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

I just had an idea about how to explain bitcoin: A bitcoin is real estate on the most secure public ledger in the world. Bitcoins are similar to land in that that the total amount is fixed. How much real estate? 1/21 millionth.
 
If the blockchain was Manhattan Island, each bitcoin would be worth 44.8 square feet.

If the Blockchain was Texas, each bitcoin would be the equivalent of 8.2 acres.

If the blockchain was North America,each bitcoin would be worth 290.7 acres.

If the blockchain was the world, each bitcoin would be worth over 2.7 square miles.








2313. Post 10901941 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 27, 2015, 12:41:49 PM
I just had an idea about how to explain bitcoin: A bitcoin is real estate on the most secure public ledger in the world. Bitcoins are similar to land in that that the total amount is fixed. How much real estate? 1/21 millionth.
  
If the blockchain was Manhattan Island, each bitcoin would be worth 44.8 square feet.

If the Blockchain was Texas, each bitcoin would be the equivalent of 8.2 acres.

If the blockchain was North America,each bitcoin would be worth 290.7 acres.

If the blockchain was the world, each bitcoin would be worth over 2.7 square miles.



why earth, earthling?

you can buy cheap land on moon these days.  

go ahead!



That would be like buying real estate on other blockchains.



2314. Post 10903425 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 27, 2015, 01:37:14 PM
I just had an idea about how to explain bitcoin: A bitcoin is real estate on the most secure public ledger in the world. Bitcoins are similar to land in that that the total amount is fixed. How much real estate? 1/21 millionth.

That is a very good analogy, except that there is no real land. 

A bitcoin is a bearer certificate of property of some fixed number of square miles of real estate on Tatooine.  Other altcoins are certificates of real estate on other imaginary planets.

The value of bitcoins is supposed to come from its hard-to-forge public land registry, where record of possession of one of those imaginary plots can be easily transferred to another person only with knowledge of the private key of its current possessor, without the need for a trusted intermediary etc.

Not any more imaginary than fiat, Prof. And time stamps have a value all their own.



2315. Post 10910286 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

In a war of attrition, all you have to do is survive long enough and you'll win.



2316. Post 10919217 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

thanks for the weekend discount, suckers!



2317. Post 10919227 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: bad trader on March 29, 2015, 10:57:38 AM
Someone market bought 2000 coins on Bitfinex.

got in just before that!



2318. Post 10919346 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: Ezmoneyezlife on March 29, 2015, 11:03:42 AM
thanks for the weekend discount, suckers!

Youre welcome m8, we will allow you to sell to us at 180$

If it comes to that, I'll be buying with both fists.



2319. Post 10934436 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

BITCOIN TRADER LOGIC:




2320. Post 10934727 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Why would anyone want to buy space on the most secure public ledger in the wold? Why would they expect a growing number of assets to be represented on this ledger?

When it's asked that way, it doesn't seem so crazy.




2321. Post 10937280 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Question: why would bear trolls be talking down the price if they still had coins to unload? They wouldn't. They would want to sell them at the highest price possible prior to the dump. Game theory would suggest their motivation is either to buy at a lower price or to cover shorts at a lower price (pretty much the same thing). The indication is that the trolls or who they represent are running out of coins to sell if they aren't out already.

The explanation that they are genuinely concerned about the welfare of "bagholders" doesn't really pass the sniff test. None of their other actions indicate that this is the case.

ALL profitable traders, whether bull or bear, help reduce volatility. A less volatile commodity is ultimately more useful and more likely to be successful. Over time, smart traders will become richer and therefor more influential while dumb traders will become less so. This process may become dwarfed by the force of new dumb traders entering the market faster than the aforementioned wealth transfer takes place, but that would suggest volatility primarily in the UPWARDS direction. Few noob traders know how to profit from a bear market or even that it is possible.

It is likely that price over time will climb, although the rate and consistency of that climb is unknown and probably unknowable. Volatility will only continue as long as there are new entrants and/or existing bad traders with money left to lose. That means we will have volatility for a long time, but it will gradually diminish, which is in fact what we are seeing.

Through it all, Bitcoin blockchain continues to be by far the most secure public ledger in the world. I see no reason to pessimistic about long term prospects, regardless of short term price drops, small and decreasing dumps and trolling by sock puppets.



2322. Post 10937661 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

More interesting than gold is the possibility of bitcoin becoming the world reserve currency. This is of course unlikely but possible due to it's global and globally accessible nature.

At present, there are ~10.5 trillion US dollars in existence (M2 money supply) which means if Bitcoin replaced dollars as world currency and world GDP remained constant, each bitcoin would be worth almost exactly $500,000 dollars (March 2015). If there is a 1% chance of bitcoin becoming the next world reserve currency, then EV is $5,000/BTC.

I think this is both way too optimistic and pessimistic. On the one hand, the probability of an experimental currency that is not even in beta yet replacing the most established currency since gold is rather lower than 1%. On the other hand, World GDP is constantly growing and bitcoin is useful for much more than just a reserve currency. It's use as a way to digitally sign documents, voting, time-stamping, micropayments, title transfer, payments, settlements, proof of holdings, etc ensure that reserve currency will be just one of many factors determining its utility, value and price. Bitcoin could conceivably become much more valuable than a half million dollars each even if it never becomes a reserve currency at all. It should also be worth noting that it may be replaced by a superior cryptocurrency and drop in value to that of a collector's item.




2323. Post 10938170 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 31, 2015, 07:34:09 AM
People who remit bitcoin from the US /UK or Canada would buy BTC at the prevailing market rates at the ATM (I assume this, maybe use one of the major exchanges as a benchmark), the moment they remit this money in BTC to folks in India or Asian countries, we do not have an atm / money exchanger who would immediately convert BTC to Fiat. Hence we put the coins up on LocalBitcoins AT A PREMIUM to market rates.

There is already a bitcoin-based remittance service for the Philippines: The sender gives them USD in the US, they use the USD to buy bitcoins at the exchanges, then sell the bitcoins in the Philippines for PHP, and give the PHP to the receiver.

Not long ago they posted to /r/bitcoin calling for help, because they had run out of OTC buyers in the Philippines, and they could only sell them on the local open market BELOW the equivalent of the USD market price, hence at a loss.

That is a general problem with bitcoin-based remittance: in order to sustain the local price, there must be a return channel that buys bitcoins at the destination country, with local currency, and sells them back at the exchanges for USD.  Arbitragers could  do that, profiting from the spread between the depressed local price an the USD market; but they would soon need to convert the USD that they get at the exchanges back into the local currency.  But if the arbitragers have a way to do that and still make a profit, then a remittance service could use the same way, and undercut the bitcoin-based service...

There would be an incentive for people like me to take a Philippine vacation and buy enough BTC at locally depressed prices to pay for the trip! I may yet do that if conditions arise.



2324. Post 10938242 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: calme on March 31, 2015, 07:55:49 AM
yes, people like you. but no other people, only people like you.

There's enough of us to keep the price differences from getting too far out of whack.



2325. Post 10938450 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 31, 2015, 08:12:21 AM
That is a general problem with bitcoin-based remittance: in order to sustain the local price, there must be a return channel that buys bitcoins at the destination country, with local currency, and sells them back at the exchanges for USD.  Arbitragers could  do that, profiting from the spread between the depressed local price an the USD market; but they would soon need to convert the USD that they get at the exchanges back into the local currency.  But if the arbitragers have a way to do that and still make a profit, then a remittance service could use the same way, and undercut the bitcoin-based service...

There would be an incentive for people like me to take a Philippine vacation and buy enough BTC at locally depressed prices to pay for the trip! I may yet do that if conditions arise.

You mean, doing arbitrage by physical transfer.

If your trip costs 2500 USD, and the local market price is 5% lower than the USD market, you would need to buy and sell ~50'000 USD worth of bitcoin to pay for the trip.

To do that you would have to exchange those 50'000 USD to PHP in the US and take the PHP with you, or take the USD and exchange them locally for PHP.  Either way, apart from the cost of the trip, that currency conversion will cost you more than what it would cost for a traditional remittance service; so it would not solve the "rebittance" problem.

What? There is no currency conversion cost when the demand for USD is greater than the demand for local currency (which is most common). The other trader eats that cost. happily. It's true that exchanging that large of an amount is problematic, so what is much more likely is that I'd exchange a smaller amount and get a discount on my vacation rather than a free trip. It's still a good deal, all things else being equal.



2326. Post 10947195 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: shmadz on April 01, 2015, 12:56:46 AM
Any Toronto folk can vouch for The Star?

Is it considered a main stream, "real news" type publication? Or is it like the onion?

http://m.thestar.com/#/article/news/canada/2015/03/23/rocco-galati-in-court-to-challenge-how-bank-of-canada-does-business.I

Edit:
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2015/03/23/rocco-galati-in-court-to-challenge-how-bank-of-canada-does-business.html

Story sounds too good to be true, hard to believe.

This guy is a moron. Wealth doesn't come from nowhere. If the Bank of Canada creates money out of nothing to finance public works (or anything really), that wealth is taken out of the pockets of everyone who saves in Canadian dollars. This is why counterfeiting is illegal. If this guy wins his case, there is a mountain of money to be made shorting the loony.



2327. Post 10948632 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: shmadz on April 01, 2015, 01:48:22 AM
Any Toronto folk can vouch for The Star?

Is it considered a main stream, "real news" type publication? Or is it like the onion?

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2015/03/23/rocco-galati-in-court-to-challenge-how-bank-of-canada-does-business.html

Story sounds too good to be true, hard to believe.

This guy is a moron. Wealth doesn't come from nowhere. If the Bank of Canada creates money out of nothing to finance public works (or anything really), that wealth is taken out of the pockets of everyone who saves in Canadian dollars. This is why counterfeiting is illegal. If this guy wins his case, there is a mountain of money to be made shorting the loony.

"That guy" is not a moron. He is a lawyer being paid to file a lawsuit. Apparently the government tried to get the case dismissed twice, and couldn't.

https://youtu.be/q0IUl2UMwt4?t=20s

^Even a 12 year old girl knows the current system is a scam.

And if counterfeiting is illegal for our government, why is it ok for private bankers?

Do you even understand the words that are coming out of your mouth you are typing?

If he's not a moron, then he's advocating a position he knows is harmful for Canadians for fame and fortune.

"And if counterfeiting is illegal for our government, why is it ok for private bankers?"

So much wrong with that question. 1)There is a difference between "illegal" and "immoral". 2) only certain types of counterfeiting are illegal for the government. When the governments of the world commit crimes, they use a combination of special pleading and renaming of the crime to justify it.

Private banks openly admit that they are lending out your demand deposits. This is questionable as a business practice but it is not fraud.  You as a consumer of banking services have the responsibility of deciding to do business with banks that are less risky. You can choose to be unbanked entirely if you can endure the inconvenience.

The system IS fucked up and I do blame the banksters, but this proposed solution will actually make the problem worse. We need more sound money, not less sound money.



2328. Post 10948799 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: Wary on April 01, 2015, 05:38:16 AM
The government is merely a bunch of servants of the Canadian populace, not their bosses. The courts can tell the government to F off any time they wish, and frequently do.
With all due respect, I still cannot comprehend why do people buy this "public servant" stuff? Try not to pay taxes or to tell a policemen/judge to F off and you'll see who are the bosses and who is merely a bunch of servants. [In fact, I'm not suggesting actually doing it. The thought experiment would suffice Smiley ]

Mark Twain — 'It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.'



2329. Post 10958297 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 01, 2015, 09:13:11 PM
Democracy is an oxymoron. Demo-cracy mean power of people, but power over whom? Over themselves? It makes no sense, like horse riding on itself.
In reality it's state having power over people. By force and deception. Police is the force, democracy is the deception. As for relations between judges and police, it may be true, but it  doesn't matter. They are parts of single entity: the state, and this entity is your collective owner. They are ultimate owners of your money, freedom and life. They can take it from you, if they decide to.

Hi again Wary,

But how would you suggest that society should arrange itself?

Society based on voluntary association, voluntary trade and voluntary interactions. While some argue over who should be dictator, a few advocate having no dictator. tale it back a step. While some argue over who should rule, some advocate no rulers.



2330. Post 10961892 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

BOOM motherfuckers! This is what is so beautiful about crypto: People who are marginally more concerned about their BTC getting seized by political robbers are going to take those coins off the exchanges until they are sold. Less coins available means lower supply relative to demand and...

$250

Antifragile, Bitches.




2331. Post 10961982 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 02, 2015, 04:43:30 PM
yea, boom to 252 and 1560 Chian money.

 Cheesy

that's how desperate you are bag holders.

My bag contains one microSD chip. Yours contains a bunch of linen notes. Which is easier to hold? I guess you'll have something to wipe your ass with, so you have that going for you.



2332. Post 10962119 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 02, 2015, 04:55:51 PM
yea, boom to 252 and 1560 Chian money.

 Cheesy

that's how desperate you are bag holders.

My bag contains one microSD chip. Yours contains a bunch of linen notes. Which is easier to hold? I guess you'll have something to wipe your ass with, so you have that going for you.


this is the best deal you will get to close those longs from 260.

My leveraged long is only 0.4 BTC. I'm not leveraged and I will wait out any crashes if they come and add to my position. I waited out the 2011 bear market so I can do it again. Bring the crash. I can handle it. I'll even lend you my coins to short.



2333. Post 10962443 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: inca on April 02, 2015, 05:23:54 PM
Shorts at 24k..

Tarmi about to cry again Smiley

And Fresh money is buying, not leveraged loans, its time to become Bull  Cheesy



If you have enough money to go long with 24 million dollars then you probably have enough to just buy the price higher. Let's be real - a single 3 million dollar market buy would take us up and over 300 instantly.

Smart money who know what is coming have been gradually building long positions for weeks, ever since the high volume reversal in January.

Retail is shorting bitcoin almost back to all time high territory in terms of contracts. This always happens to stubborn traders who lose objectivity after being correct for so long when the trend is changing. They get burnt badly.

24K BTC swaps. Last time that happened we damn near broke $300.



2334. Post 10962600 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: dannyspk on April 02, 2015, 05:28:31 PM
Shorts at 24k..

Tarmi about to cry again Smiley

And Fresh money is buying, not leveraged loans, its time to become Bull  Cheesy




How do you know about Fresh money?

Because the amount of USD swaps hasn't gone up appreciably, meaning those coins were probably not bought with leverage.



2335. Post 10962920 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 02, 2015, 05:58:44 PM
Shorts at 24k..

Tarmi about to cry again Smiley

And Fresh money is buying, not leveraged loans, its time to become Bull  Cheesy




How do you know about Fresh money?

Because the amount of USD swaps hasn't gone up appreciably, meaning those coins were probably not bought with leverage.



good.

bulls finally sending some real cash to exchanges to take over those expansive leverage long positions means we are squeezing them.

Your logic here doesn't make sense. If this pattern continues the shorts will actually get squeezed, the longs will not unless we pierce 235 (or lower)


nope. many longs are underwater already.



$2 less underwater than they were an hour ago! Seriously, after a 14 month bear market, nobody's jumping into a highly leveraged long position. We've had that beaten out of us. The risk of a long margin call cascade is minimal. Now it's the bear's turn to learn some things the hard way.




2336. Post 10962970 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Ripple Labs is the equivalent of a central bank for XRP. If we wanted a central bank, we would have kept our fiat.



2337. Post 10963057 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 02, 2015, 06:14:30 PM
n a lot of monkeys start to yell that we are out of bear market, and in the makings of a bull market and start to buy on margin at 260~290 because we are going to the moon.

Cheesy

if I am not wrong, even you are long from 260. Cheesy


Market turns are only detectable after the fact. It's entirely possible we've been in a bull market since mid January.  I've been long since $260, but only margin long since $243 and only barely so.

We ARE going to the moon again, but we may go down first. Moon is almost inevitable when fiat supply is infinite.



2338. Post 10963161 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 02, 2015, 06:28:10 PM


Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity.

do you have access to infinite supply of fiat?

My access is limited only by my working life span. I can keep buying until I am unemployable and maybe even after that.



2339. Post 10963328 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 02, 2015, 06:39:37 PM


Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity.

do you have access to infinite supply of fiat?

My access is limited only by my working life span. I can keep buying until I am unemployable and maybe even after that.


I am afraid you are limited by your intelligence, not your life span.


intelligence only affects the rate of wealth accumulation, not the duration. Fiat is being created at a faster rate than BTC which means that as long as there is ANY trade between the two, the natural price direction is up. reversals are merely temporary corrections when the price goes up too fast.



2340. Post 10963583 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 02, 2015, 06:59:54 PM


Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity.

do you have access to infinite supply of fiat?

My access is limited only by my working life span. I can keep buying until I am unemployable and maybe even after that.


I am afraid you are limited by your intelligence, not your life span.


intelligence only affects the rate of wealth accumulation, not the duration. Fiat is being created at a faster rate than BTC which means that as long as there is ANY trade between the two, the natural price direction is up. reversals are merely temporary corrections when the price goes up too fast.


if you want to put it like that ok. you will need 1000 years to accumulate as much as some millionaire in a year. so yeah, you can say you are limited by your life span, because intelligence.

if you take into consideration the total supply of coins and the daily rate of generation of new coins, you will realize that your statement about faster rate is not true.

3600 coins are mined each day. The amount of new fiat that needs to be created to purchase those coins is less than a million dollars US. The amount of fiat created daily through QE and FRB than can potentially be used to support that price increases by many many times that amount. Indeed I can create fiat just by borrowing it from a fractional reserve bank. It's far easier than creating bitcoin by mining.



2341. Post 10963672 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

I can sell Bitcoin, but I can also spend it or lend it. What can you do with a short contract? Only sell it or pay the vig.



2342. Post 10963792 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 02, 2015, 07:24:57 PM


so all the new money printed will go into this shit by itself.

tell me more please.

and you can create fiat just by borrowing it? why are you not rich then?

Calm down, T. I know you're losing money by the minute right now, but these things ebb an flow. You have made what we called in the Navy Nuclear program a GCE, a gross conceptual error. The asset and the liability are created simultaneously, like a particle and an antiparticle. The  problem is the liability requires interest to service and so there will never be enough money to pay back all debts created. Paradoxically this means the entire system relies on constantly inflating the money supply forever. If they didn't do that, there would be a deflationary heat death.

I AM substantially richer than I was before investing in BTC if valued by net worth mark to market. I did that by creating fiat and trading it for harder-to-create bitcoin. The trick was not being too greedy. I have had to endure long stretches of time in upsidedown positions and I have to always always be able to service the debt.



2343. Post 10963866 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 02, 2015, 07:32:27 PM
I can sell Bitcoin, but I can also spend it or lend it. What can you do with a short contract? Only sell it or pay the vig.

one is a wanna-be-money and other is a contract.

what's your point genius?


The point is that one has more utility than the other. You don't need to be a genius to see that.



2344. Post 10963993 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 02, 2015, 07:48:03 PM


so all the new money printed will go into this shit by itself.

tell me more please.

and you can create fiat just by borrowing it? why are you not rich then?

Calm down, T. I know you're losing money by the minute right now, but these things ebb an flow. You have made what we called in the Navy Nuclear program a GCE, a gross conceptual error. The asset and the liability are created simultaneously, like a particle and an antiparticle. The  problem is the liability requires interest to service and so there will never be enough money to pay back all debts created. Paradoxically this means the entire system relies on constantly inflating the money supply forever. If they didn't do that, there would be a deflationary heat death.

I AM substantially richer than I was before investing in BTC if valued by net worth mark to market. I did that by creating fiat and trading it for harder-to-create bitcoin. The trick was not being too greedy. I have had to endure long stretches of time in upsidedown positions and I have to always always be able to service the debt.

bla bla bla

what the fuck did you just say? are you drunk or something?

The point is that one has more utility than the other. You don't need to be a genius to see that.

wanna-be-money has more utility than a short selling contract of wanna-be-money?

dude, you are a fking genius.

and on ignore.


bye

I hope the butthurt isn't too bad. Then you won't even be able to use your fiat as toilet paper.



2345. Post 10964025 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on April 02, 2015, 08:00:43 PM
How does this service work?
They don't explain it in their site.

Are they using BTC and then converting it to fiat again? Are they just using the blokchain without touching BTC?

They just say "we use the blockchain", do you have more details on how this all works?

They probably operate as a hawaladar and use BTC for settlements. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawala



2346. Post 10986279 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

So Trolfi thinks the miners might want to delay the halving in order to have more coins to sell. Ridiculous. A delay would mean a precedent. If there is one delay, there may be more. I would immediately divest myself of my entire holdings and I wouldn't be alone. The miners know this and they won't do something that will crash the price and destroy their livelihood.

Incentives work. The success of this project demonstrates that and it is why the Statist are so rabidly opposed to it.  People have an overwhelming tendency to do what is in their INDIVIDUAL perceived best interest, including the supposed angels who control which way government guns are pointing.





2347. Post 10986609 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 05, 2015, 06:35:25 AM

I don't know whether the miners will try to delay the halving (or do some other "sacrilege").  But, if they were to try, my estimate is that less than 10% of the bitcoiners would be furiously opposed to the halving delay, the other 90% will not care, and only the 4-5 miners with 60% of the hashpower will be in favor.  Then these miners will do it anyway; and 99.9% of the bitcoiners will accept the change, including most of those who swore that they would abandon bitcoin if that happened. Because their greed will speak louder than their ideology.


Where do you come up with this nonsense? Those 4-5 miners would postpone the halving to sell twice as many coins at less than a quarter the price?  The halving is priced in and if it doesn't happen there will be a crash. Everybody knows this.

Greedy miners are why it WON'T happen. Destroying the value of the thing you sell is just bad business. That's obvious to anyone who doesn't live in an ivory tower.



2348. Post 10988089 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Easter pump! 



2349. Post 10988353 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Quote from: NotHatinJustTrollin on April 05, 2015, 11:21:18 AM
Bitcoin is trustless, you don't have to trust anybody*










* You only have to trust a bunch of chinese anon dudes that for all we know are pretending to be different pools so they could attack the network right now.

You have to trust people to act in their own best interest as opposed to central bankers who are supposed to ignore their own best interest and act for the good of the citizenry.  Who is being naive?



2350. Post 10988655 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

$260 Bitchez!!



2351. Post 10990266 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Chinese wash volume!!!! derp. is this going to be a new trope?



2352. Post 11008142 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Quote from: Ezmoneyezlife on April 07, 2015, 11:00:29 AM
i think this is just a deceptive mexican standoff conjured up to probe the market, mislead the price guess.. notice how this is being delayed... if i'm observing correctly shorts vs longs is no longer accurate as it used to be in 2014 as it's becoming way too predictable and less profitable... i'm still positive that this market is rigged up to eyeballs and any engineered "news leak" any day now should set the direction either way to manipulators' benefits... i wouldn't be surprised if the forces that move this market are present in both sides of the leveraged market...

Exactly, market is being totally manipulated, its obvious for everyone who has brain and some trading experience, for now btc market is just a scam machine for some "elite" groups http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-elite-meet-secret-island-bilderberg-style-retreat/ , they dont even hide it. BTC is not being used as currency much now and its "market" price is totally rigged up cos real btc btc as for me is arounds nr i 130-160$ maximum, it will rise later this year but only after retesting of those levels. Its a shame that such a great idea of free money have been raped by the same motherfuckers with the same methods of fiat "elite" just to make them much more rich after fiat system fails.

There is no evidence that "the elite" are some homogeneous group with identical interests. Cartels fail because the more they succeed, the more incentive there is to defect. Every time I hear some conspiracy theory, i see some losers latching onto some excuse for failure. If the price is being manipulated down, GOOD! It's an opportunity to load up cheap. If the price is being manipulated up, GOOD! sell for profit.



2353. Post 11075509 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

I would love to see a $180 double bottom, especially on high volume, but I can't wait for something that may happen at all. I have buy orders far north of that and If I get in too early, I can live with that. Somebody's  gonna wait too long and it won't be me.

Greece is going to implement capital controls within a month or two. The smart ones are going to want crypto and I plan on being in a position to provide it. If you think Bitcoin is volatile, just wait until the Grexit.  Things are going to get interesting.



2354. Post 11075620 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 13, 2015, 03:51:50 PM
I would love to see a $180 double bottom, especially on high volume, but I can't wait for something that may happen at all. I have buy orders far north of that and If I get in too early, I can live with that. Somebody's  gonna wait too long and it won't be me.

Greece is going to implement capital controls within a month or two. The smart ones are going to want crypto and I plan on being in a position to provide it. If you think Bitcoin is volatile, just wait until the Grexit.  Things are going to get interesting.

Billy Joe Banjo! Haven't seen you in a while. Lots of fires in the south?

Just got back from one. A little house fire, nothing to get excited about. I got a second job to take advantage of these low BTC prices so I hope it stays down long enough for me to load up. I'll soon be in a position to hold indefinitely and even add to my position so I don't much care which way the price goes in the next few months.



2355. Post 11091218 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

weird striping on the 15 min chart; red green red green red green red green. Green candles are bigger. Somebody bought a lot with very little slippage.  Don't know if it's smart to buy now, but the way he bought it was smart.



2356. Post 11111971 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Getting kind of worried about this $2 drop, cuz y'know, bitcoiners can't handle that kind of volatility.



2357. Post 11112060 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on April 17, 2015, 02:05:05 AM



ba dum chhh!

What a kick ass rig!

A floppy drive? And a modem!?

All my lousy parents could get me was a Vic 20 with a tape drive. Embarrassed

Took over ten minutes just to load Zaxxon...  Cry

My buddy had a C64 though, used to go over to his house all the time to play choplifter.

I remember the locks on those floppy disc boxes. Such security  Smiley

My Coleco Adam had 16k more memory than the commie 64, tape drive AND flywheel printer. THAT was disruptive, Baby.



2358. Post 11159913 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

>29K shorts on BFX!   that's gonna be a heluva squeeze if the margin calls cascade.



2359. Post 11164355 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on April 22, 2015, 03:07:19 PM
i would be surprised if this goes above 255 before next dump

I'm guessing $238.99 was the top because I have a sell order at $239  Angry



2360. Post 11164501 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: noobtrader on April 22, 2015, 03:34:51 PM
i would be surprised if this goes above 255 before next dump

I'm guessing $238.99 was the top because I have a sell order at $239  Angry

why? are you turning into a bear Huh



Hell no. I'm just trying to do a little profit taking. Punishing volatility means you sell when it goes up TOO FAST. I reinvest the profits during the dips.



2361. Post 11164527 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: madmat on April 22, 2015, 03:37:35 PM
i would be surprised if this goes above 255 before next dump

I'm guessing $238.99 was the top because I have a sell order at $239  Angry

You should avoid round numbers for your orders.

It wouldn't have helped this time because it would have been a higher sell order by a few cents and not lower, but you're right.



2362. Post 11164773 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: madmat on April 22, 2015, 03:55:10 PM
i would be surprised if this goes above 255 before next dump

I'm guessing $238.99 was the top because I have a sell order at $239  Angry

You should avoid round numbers for your orders.

It wouldn't have helped this time because it would have been a higher sell order by a few cents and not lower, but you're right.
Sell orders should be set just under round price, not the opposite.

I mean it would have been something like 239.97. Besides, if everybody does it it won't work.



2363. Post 11164807 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: gizmoh on April 22, 2015, 03:59:12 PM
Finex having a hard time following chinese exchanges.

Are Grand-mas back to bitcoin land? Cheesy



There's very few retail traders left in China. They don't have nearly the influence they used to have. China is more likely to follow western exchanges now than the other way around. (Unless you consider BFX Chinese, which I don't. )



2364. Post 11165207 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 22, 2015, 04:33:58 PM
Anyone else think it's suspicious that the Gox lawyer is called Kobayashi, just like in The Usual Suspects? Pretty sure no good can come of this.
I was thinking of Kobayashi Maru.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobayashi_Maru

Kobayashi is a very common Japanese surname; I had a colleague with it.

Anyone finds it suspicious that the Coinbase CEO is Armstrong, like the first man to step on the moon?  Cheesy

or the guy who got his seven Tour De France victories taken away.



2365. Post 11168357 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on April 22, 2015, 10:23:14 PM
Looks like Gavin and core devs about to upgrade to the penthouse suite:

https://twitter.com/gavinandresen/status/590884520318078976

Get out from the Bitcoin Foundation shack and into the 5 star MIT estate.

No more cup o noodles and tuna fish for the core devs.  Lobster and New England Clam Chowdah babee!!!

This is not good for bitcoin as we know it now. As an independent 'outsider' technology it has failed to survive. Media labs have effectively 'poached' the top devs from bitcoin.

This failure of the BF to keep the whole show together wil undoubtedly lead to a schism within the development community. It looks like Bitcoin2.0 is now inevitable in the near future.
What happens to us owners of bitcoin 1.0

It would take years to match the hashing power of the 1.0 network. It would take a combination of significantly better tech, a large initial capital investment and a smart marketing strategy to be competitive.
Bitcoin 1.0 will prolly even benefit from free publicity. To say NewCoin is better than Bitcoin is to tacitly admit that Bitcoin is the standard.



2366. Post 11168585 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/33ik6v/google_trends_bitcoin_in_greece_vs_bitcoin_in_the/

Greeks are googling "bitcoin" at an increasing rate relative to the rest of the world.  Capital controls are coming.  People in Greece are looking for a solution. 



2367. Post 11203830 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Leveraged longs have no fiat and so their swap fees are taken out of their BTC holdings and sold. Over 25 million $ in longs amounts to a small river of selling by BULLS.  This creates a sizable headwind for any upward movement.




2368. Post 11216316 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

GOT YOUR COINS, MOTHERFUCKERS!!



2369. Post 11216338 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 27, 2015, 09:47:12 PM
shorting like a MOFO

ON TOP OF 33k SHORTS already on the books? Go for it. I want MOAR COINZ!



2370. Post 11216569 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 27, 2015, 09:53:35 PM
I gotta ask... Tarmi, palms already sweaty? If your phone is ringing, you know very well who it could be: Margin. Cheesy This rise doesn't even have to be organic, the mere fact that Finex and Huobi, et al. are following, is causing some nice short squeezes, that could end very ugly for a lot of people bears.


the mere fact that you poor fuckers cant see a shitstorm that is coming to you is what will make me rich.

fUNNY, i WAZ GONNA TELL U THE SAME THING



2371. Post 11221344 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: nanobrain on April 28, 2015, 10:11:02 AM
GOT YOUR COINS, MOTHERFUCKERS!!

How'd that work out for you....



So funny reading all those "here we go" posts 12 hours ago...."and bears be like"

yeah, yeah

If you wanna give me even moar coinz, go ahead. I'm patient and not over-leveraged. The lower it goes, the more buying power I have.



2372. Post 11221890 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 28, 2015, 12:22:10 PM

If you wanna give me even moar coinz, go ahead. I'm patient and not over-leveraged. The lower it goes, the more buying power I have.



no, stupid fuck.

your buying power will be the same, you will just buy more coins.

My ability to buy coinz will increase, even if the amount of fiat I have to spend remains constant. I'm pretty sure you'll run out of coinz to sell before I run out of fiat, unless I get fired I suppose.



2373. Post 11222024 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: tarmi on April 28, 2015, 12:36:39 PM

If you wanna give me even moar coinz, go ahead. I'm patient and not over-leveraged. The lower it goes, the more buying power I have.



no, stupid fuck.

your buying power will be the same, you will just buy more coins.

My ability to buy coinz will increase






I can see that only your ability to bullshit is increasing while prices are decreasing.

no actual use of it.

You're getting cranky. I tell ya what: I won't buy anymore coinz until Friday unless we go under $200. You have until then to close your shorts with minimal losses or reasonable gains. After that, I'm back in accumulation mode.



2374. Post 11222543 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on April 28, 2015, 01:04:36 PM

If you wanna give me even moar coinz, go ahead. I'm patient and not over-leveraged. The lower it goes, the more buying power I have.



no, stupid fuck.

your buying power will be the same, you will just buy more coins.

My ability to buy coinz will increase, even if the amount of fiat I have to spend remains constant. I'm pretty sure you'll run out of coinz to sell before I run out of fiat, unless I get fired I suppose.
Chinese megaminers have plenty of coins to dump, don't worry about that  Grin

um, no. All miners everywhere have only 3600 coins/day to dump, excluding stockpiles. How much stockpiles are left after a 15 MONTH BEAR MARKET is unknown, but the number is surely much smaller than in the past. at $225/BTC, that's only $810,000 dollars bulls have to pony up to keep prices stable. At ~five million unique wallets, just over 16% of which have to contribute ONE DOLLAR A DAY TO HOLD THIS PRICE LEVEL. That may not happen, but are you willing to bet on it?



2375. Post 11224454 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 28, 2015, 04:02:45 PM
Volume on BTC-E is nothing like yesterday though

yet. The day's not over.



2376. Post 11227498 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Has anyone else noticed that bitcoin price has stayed in the range of ~$170 to $320 for the entire year so far? there was not a single four month period in 2014 when price stayed in a $150 range. Not even close.



2377. Post 11227881 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: Natalia_AnatolioPAMM on April 28, 2015, 09:40:54 PM
Has anyone else noticed that bitcoin price has stayed in the range of ~$170 to $320 for the entire year so far? there was not a single four month period in 2014 when price stayed in a $150 range. Not even close.

it won't last long  Huh

That depends on what you mean by "long".  Stability makes bitcoin more useful which makes it more valuable which causes the price to rise until it goes parabolic, where it becomes less useful and crashes.



2378. Post 11228229 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

1 HR and 4 HR moving averages both just turned green.



2379. Post 11228347 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: Norway on April 28, 2015, 11:29:27 PM
Folks, I wish I had time to count the number of posts about ✫ME✫ in the last few pages.  But (a) I have a class to prepare and (b) if my ego gets any bigger, it won't fit through the door...
Nobody believes you have a class.

FTFY



2380. Post 11249912 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Stability would be nice. We have to build a base for the next rally. We may see some upside, but I'm thinking mostly sideways for a while.



2381. Post 11252445 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: findftp on May 01, 2015, 10:50:15 AM
Stability would be nice. We have to build a base for the next rally. We may see some upside, but I'm thinking mostly sideways for a while.

Still buying a coin a day?

On average, I am close. I loaded up in the $220s and teens. I actually sold ten yesterday when we got into the $240s, but I expect to buy them back this weekend and a little more.  




2382. Post 11268632 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

I'm starting to wonder if my weekend discount is going to materialize.

The decentral bankers are getting better at managing our money supply. We are getting closer to stability and making profits in the process.  

We're still range trading, but in the next month or two, the general trading strategy will shift to BTFD, hodl, sell only when the graph goes parabolic.



2383. Post 11275264 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on May 03, 2015, 07:16:38 PM
The way I see it: some banks are starting to invest in bitcoin companies (but not bitcoin the currency itself) simply because they suspect that something will come out of this whole crypto thing. It doesn't have to be bitcoin the currency itself, it doesn't have to be a "coin", maybe a payment network, maybe another technology, a distributed ledger system, who knows.

Yeah, like investing in pets.com was a good idea just in case this whole "internet thing" takes off.

Blockchain tech only works if you have enough mining power to secure the ledger. If Big Money is starting to pay attention, then it's only a matter of time for them to discover that recreating the entire infrastructure just to keep us early adopters from making money is more risky and more expensive than paying us off.  Perhaps you remember the "information superhighway" that was supposed to supersede the Internet. Nope. They just built on top of it.

They will build on top of Bitcoin because They love making profits more than they hate guys like me. It's the smart thing to do.



2384. Post 11286743 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: rolling on May 04, 2015, 09:01:19 PM
What does that mean, "Volx100" and then "0.01"

I'm thinking it means Vol/100 (0.01*100 = 1), but it actually says 0.01/100 = 0.0001?

.01 * 100 = 1 share of GBTC which equals ~.1 BTC so currently the price of BTC on GBTC is $1750/BTC

That's my understanding.  How many do they have to sell before they have to buy more BTC to keep the price even remotely close to the equivalent prices on the major exchanges?



2385. Post 11299891 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 06, 2015, 12:07:38 AM
After such long, unexpected and exhausting bear stretch I'm just afraid to be an optimist. Smiley

Being cynical simply to avoid ridicule is the way of the coward. Rejoice and praise the rocket gifs! We are going to da blimmin  mooooon!!!!

Also, I'm a miner so I don't really have a choice.
Granted, cynicism is just the same error as naivety, just in opposite direction. But it's not ridicule what I'm afraid of. It's making wrong bet.
As for "no choice", remember: Even if you are swallowed, you still have two exits. Smiley

No one is going to be churned up in the guts of anything. Stop being so negative all the time!

I'm NOT sure about whether the question is about being too negative or NOT...   It just seems that the reality of the matter is that we are going to need to see quite a few changes in market dynamics to reverse the bear trend.

Surely, if BTC prices were to double, then a lot of press would come to BTC, and maybe we could continue the upward price trajectory.... on the other hand, now-a-days, as compared with 18 months ago, there are a lot more market mechanisms that allow the shorting of bitcoin... and therefore, it seems that people do NOT even need to hold bitcoin in order to bet against them (or to sell them)... In that regard, seems like that there is some fractional reserve banking going on in the bitcoin world (which seems to be contrary to the public ledger and contrary to the original blockchain design of BTC). 


It seems possible that some day, bitcoin market mechanisms will be created that will recognize more value to those people who actually hold actual bitcoins.... but at this point, there seems to be too much diluting of the value of bitcoin going on which seems to be causing downward price pressures, including keeping these prices in the $200s territory for more than 4 months.

Shorting does not hurt an asset's long term value. Shorts all have to cover at some point and that can be instrumental in halting a crash. Also, if the short-sellers gets squeezed, it can be a huge spike. There is no evidence of naked shorts (people selling coins that don't exist) and if it's happening at all it is being done by the exchanges themselves and they have no incentive to do this. They all explicitly claim they don't do or allow naked shorts.

What we are seeing is relative stability. Bitcoin has traded in the same $150 range for over four months, a situation that hasn't happened in years. This is a very good thing as it draws in investors who get frightened off by excessive volatility. Generally speaking investors buy and hold while traders pump and dump.



2386. Post 11310632 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

30K dump moves price down ~$5?? Now I see shorts are up to 30K on BFX. Bears be runnin out of coinz to dump. At this point all they are doing is providing support when/if they cover. I don't know if All week hands have been shaken out, but certainly more have been than yesterday. Bear market running out of steam.



2387. Post 11312735 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 07, 2015, 04:17:55 PM


That would be a bit painful and might help explain the healthy bidside too
I'd also be pretty pissed at BFX if they spoofed me into a short last night Cheesy

Shorting at this point it time seems excessively risky, like picking up nickles in front of a train. BFX is very influential and may even lead this market, but it doesn't control it. They had a glitch related to an UPGRADE. They are upgrading.



2388. Post 11313631 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

30K dump to drop $6, 10k pump to retrace. Hmmmmm.



2389. Post 11313718 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Any sane person selling GBTC shares @ $600/BTC would either double up with the proceeds or buy the same number of coins he just sold and pocket the other half!



2390. Post 11313759 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

1k shorts closed as stop losses are being triggered. I was kinda hoping they wouldn't have any stoploss triggers so we could get the force liquidations, but the bears seem to be only partly stupid.



2391. Post 11313980 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on May 07, 2015, 06:37:09 PM
Volume on GBTC is 2268

at the effective rate of $550/BTC!



2392. Post 11314490 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: kenji on May 07, 2015, 07:17:29 PM
do you guys think $1k are still possible this year?

possible but unlikely, IMHO. We still have one more U.S. Marshals auction to go and if we get a major push into overbought conditions, we will be vulnerable to a bear counterattack.  Organic growth takes time and sentiment doesn't change on a dime. There will still be many bargains on the road to recovery.



2393. Post 11316224 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Starting to look like a bullish pennant on the 1 hr chart.

edit: or not.



2394. Post 11318175 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on May 08, 2015, 03:42:57 AM
This is what goes passes for capitulation for me. I'm out of fiat. out of leverage. Might lose everything in a margin call. Pawn shops are closed and I just bet the mortgage money. I'm just a spectator now. Good luck, Gentleman. I did everything I could.



how did I get here?

Who reads old stuff like this? What was the price back then? Good think I got a few paychecks since then.



2395. Post 11323014 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: Feri22 on May 08, 2015, 05:12:07 PM
What has to happen to be sure that we have a confirmed reversal? Break 260? 270? 280? 290? 300?

Not confirmed yet. Moving averages are all green out to the three day. We have to wait for the weekly moving average to go positive before it's confirmed.  That could take a month if it happens at all. I'm long but not excessively so. Look for a possible entry point this weekend if you missed the first couple stops on the train. A  nine to twelve dollar pullback ought to do.



2396. Post 11324812 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Sure looks like a bull pennant on the 30 min chart.



2397. Post 11326946 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: lyth0s on May 08, 2015, 10:51:57 PM
Is this not a typical place where bears would have dumped?



Yes, if they still had any coins left. Grin



2398. Post 11333420 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

And the 15 min chart is back into the green! What did I say yesterday? Wait for a $9-$12 pullback for your entry point.  Yes, that was me. You're welcome.



2399. Post 11333695 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: Wings1987 on May 09, 2015, 10:38:01 PM
small volume spike. Moving up a bit. Similar thing happened yesterday but it didn't have any legs. Maybe today?

nope. We've had too many Saturday Night dumps. All we have to do is hold above ~$238 and all the weekend bargain hunters will get back on the train tomorrow night.



2400. Post 11341886 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Does anyone seriously think that the people who invested hundreds of millions into the the infrastructure are not going to buy any coin also? there are over 12,000,000 millionaires (USD) in the world. If they decided to buy an average of one bitcoin each, there would barely be enough to go around.  A bitcoin costs about ~ $240,  one four thousandth of a million dollars or 0.00025%.   

Even if they are almost certain bitcoin will fail, that's an extremely cheap insurance policy against them being wrong.

There are seven and a half billion people in the world. If one person in 577,000 bought in average of one bitcoin each, there would barely be enough to go around.

Bitcoins are scarce. They are precious. In a world with capital controls, trade sanctions, negative interest rates and confiscatory government policies, it is the currency with almost zero storage and transfer fees.  It's resistant to theft, forfeiture, clawbacks, seizure, and debasement. It is the future and bears are on the wrong side of history.



2401. Post 11342069 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Bitcoin has a much much lower chance of failure now than it did when I bought in for $10 in 2011. This isn't even my first 18 month bear market. This is normal, but hodling is hard. At the next ATH when we find ourselves regretting not buying MOAR NOW, don't let anybody tell you you didn't earn every bit of it.



2402. Post 11357337 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: nerioseole on May 12, 2015, 06:55:36 AM
Bitcoin price has become so boring, it might start to be useful as a currency !




I hope so! Congratulations to all the other decentral bankers who helped us achieve that goal. We are making the world a better place, Gentlemen.



2403. Post 11360564 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

The only people making money now are those who are lending out coins and fiat at BFX. I should take a vacation. This is the time for us to smear on some SPF 50, done shades and and crawl out of our caves.



2404. Post 11360981 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

in the next 24 hrs, I predict the price will go up, down or sideways. The timing will be critical.



2405. Post 11362081 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

a few signs of life.  1 and 2 hr moving averages turned positive.  Juuuust a little pumpy pumpy. That's what I told her.



2406. Post 11362121 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: ghandi on May 13, 2015, 06:30:08 AM
Another day, another breakout attempt.  Roll Eyes

It's the middle of the night and Europe isn't even waking up yet. This one may actually work.



2407. Post 11365122 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Has anyone stopped to consider that the dollar index is down for two months in a row? What this means is that bitcoin is already in a clear bull market (significantly above the 200 day moving average) in almost every fiat currency other than the USD and currencies that are pegged to the dollar.

Just in case you are wondering why there has been no correction for weeks.



2408. Post 11365190 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 13, 2015, 12:17:05 PM

What worries me the most is that for 95% of all the bitcoin startups, VCs are just throwing huge sums of $$$ at them, but they are all basically creating "solutions looking for problems" instead of solving real needs.  Gee, where have I seen and lived through that before?  Oh yes, the DotComBomb of 2000.  Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.


Indeed. But there were a few trillion dollars to be made before it all went tits up and then things really got rolling after the wreckage had been cleared. I hope it doesn't pan out that way but it's kind of a natural cycle.

Believe it or not, one of the companies that I'm most worried about is Coinbase.  

For example, go look at their employee roster page at the bottom.
https://www.coinbase.com/about

In in the past 2 years, I have literally watched that page grow from about 5 employees to what you see now on that page.  And they just keep adding more employees.  At the rate they are going, unless something drastically changes I don't think that they are going to have a business model that will support all of that headcount and still make a profit.

Not wrong, but not the full picture either:

a) true, it might quite well go down in flames, and that early VC capital will be lost like tears in the rain;

b) then again, it's a (controlled) gamble on their side, similar to early dotcom seed/investments: if it pays off, it'll pay off rather royally, if not, it's a (comparably) minor hit to their total holdings. Which brings me to:

c) on a different scale, through a different aspect of the market, that's similar to the "bet" we're making here as well: most who hold some long-term BTC position do so because of the chance (by his/her best judgement) that there's a big unrealized economical potential for the Blockchain (emphasis on the Blockchain), which (again, by his/her best judgement) in turn would likely lead to a major appreciation of market value per token.

The flip side of this bet just as the one by VC: it might not work out that way - alternative blockchains might take the lead, public and business interest might stay comparably small (i.e. "solutions looking for problems" turns out to be true and stay true), etc.

Some people here conveniently ignore the latter point, only going on about the limitless potential. Others pretend there is no potential, only risk, and eventually: doom. Personally, I think it's simply too early to draw either conclusion, 6 years since launch, and ~2 years since VC started pouring in for real.

The potential value of colored coins is limited by the security of the blockchain used. No altcoin can come close to bitcoin, nor can one come close without an investment comparable to bitcoin's current market cap.

The limits of transactions and block size can be overcome with core client changes or even sidechains. Blockchain investment is either bitcoin investment or wasted money.  It may take the Wall Street idiots a while to figure that out.



2409. Post 11365230 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: inca on May 13, 2015, 02:02:45 PM
Has anyone stopped to consider that the dollar index is down for two months in a row? What this means is that bitcoin is already in a clear bull market (significantly above the 200 day moving average) in almost every fiat currency other than the USD and currencies that are pegged to the dollar.

Just in case you are wondering why there has been no correction for weeks.

It is far to soon to correlate USD and bitcoin to any meaningful degree. Volume is so low globally we can clearly see individual traders footprints..



We don't know that. It could have already started. Correlation is only clear after the fact. What we do know is that, all things being equal, it should correlate at some point.



2410. Post 11365298 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Cloven on May 13, 2015, 02:09:16 PM
[ ... ] It may take the Wall Street idiots a while to figure that out.
They're no match for a fireman from the sticks, granted. Give them time.

Ad Hominem is a logical fallacy. Points for putting "match"' "sticks" and "fireman" in the same sentence.



2411. Post 11365310 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 13, 2015, 02:18:08 PM
Has anyone stopped to consider that the dollar index is down for two months in a row? What this means is that bitcoin is already in a clear bull market (significantly above the 200 day moving average) in almost every fiat currency other than the USD and currencies that are pegged to the dollar.

Just in case you are wondering why there has been no correction for weeks.

It is far to soon to correlate USD and bitcoin to any meaningful degree. Volume is so low globally we can clearly see individual traders footprints..



We don't know that. It could have already started. Correlation is only clear after the fact. What we do know is that, all things being equal, it should correlate at some point.

All things being equal, the price of BTC would drop in other currencies as the dollar weakened if BTC:USD remained constant, so I don't quite understand your comment on how their charts would look more bulish in a weakining dollar scenario (talking purely about effect of FX rates here, nothing else)



The correlation is negative, obviously. Otherwise my argument makes no sense. Dollar down= bitcoin up in other currencies. We need diversification of BTC ownership for stability and the market incentives suggest we'll get (or possibly are getting) a relative boost from outside the U.S.

Bitcoin was designed to be a dollar inflation hedge.



2412. Post 11365417 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 13, 2015, 02:23:20 PM
Has anyone stopped to consider that the dollar index is down for two months in a row? What this means is that bitcoin is already in a clear bull market (significantly above the 200 day moving average) in almost every fiat currency other than the USD and currencies that are pegged to the dollar.

Just in case you are wondering why there has been no correction for weeks.

It is far to soon to correlate USD and bitcoin to any meaningful degree. Volume is so low globally we can clearly see individual traders footprints..



We don't know that. It could have already started. Correlation is only clear after the fact. What we do know is that, all things being equal, it should correlate at some point.

All things being equal, the price of BTC would drop in other currencies as the dollar weakened if BTC:USD remained constant, so I don't quite understand your comment on how their charts would look more bulish in a weakining dollar scenario (talking purely about effect of FX rates here, nothing else)



The correlation is negative, obviously. Otherwise my argument makes no sense.

The comment makes no sense
Inverse correlation between  $ and BTC price flatters the BTC:USD chart more than that of any other currency as the dollar weakens

My assumption is that BTC:USD is NOT constant, quite the opposite. We're already in a BTC:Euro bull market, for example. I'm basically saying that the market has more upward momentum than the BTC:USD charts are showing. How much more is unknown.



2413. Post 11365540 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Price stability means that someone or group is buying net 3600 coins/day. Some one is buying very patiently and it's not just bears deleveraging. More bitcoins in the hands of patient people=bullish.



2414. Post 11365698 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 13, 2015, 02:43:03 PM


Still not understanding your logic BJA . How can the BTC:EUR chart look more bullish than BTC:USD chart if USD is weakening against the Euro? Hint - it can't  Wink
This is my last reply on the topic.  You can carry on believing your false logic if you like, but I'm done trying to help you see the error in your thought process.
Nothing personal - it's just boring now ...

because of arbitrage. inverse BTC:USD correlation implies that as the dollar continues to sink against other currencies, BTC:USD will go continue to go up. basically BTC:everyotherfiat currency is more constant than BTC:USD.

Sorry I didn't explain this well. I'm not sure what the FX terminology is.




2415. Post 11365778 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Cloven on May 13, 2015, 02:55:19 PM
[ ... ] It may take the Wall Street idiots a while to figure that out.
They're no match for a fireman from the sticks, granted. Give them time.

Ad Hominem is a logical fallacy. Points for putting "match"' "sticks" and "fireman" in the same sentence.

Billy Joe, though even a cat may look at a king, it's in no position to judge.

"Ad hominem" doesn't apply here. Not attacking your character. It's only reasonable to assume that financial advice of a fireman from the sticks is less likely to be useful than that of those who were educated and work in finance.
Just like it's perfectly reasonable to take medical opinion of a physician over ...oh, let's say "fireman from the sticks."
Smiley


Huh Ad Hominem doesn't just apply to character. Judge the argument, not the person making the argument. It should stand or fall on it's own merits, not mine. I'm not appealing to my authority as an expert.

Having said that, I did buy a car on the Internet before the World Wide Web was invented, had my first wireless modem in 1997 and bought a first generation iPhone a two weeks after launch. I'm good at spotting tech trends.  I'm a firefighter because I'm an adrenaline junkie, not because economics and finance are beyond my comprehension.



2416. Post 11365831 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):


Quote from: oda.krell on May 13, 2015, 01:51:33 PM


Why continue building your position if you're not also working on building the economy that eventually, hopefully, leads to an increase of valuation of position?


because money has been pouring into infrastructure for a year and a half while BTC price has plummeted. Price conveys information.  investment in infrastructure and the underlying economy should be balanced in a healthy ecosystem. bulls are helping to achieve relatively more balance.



2417. Post 11366935 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Cloven on May 13, 2015, 03:45:07 PM



Stop confusing being trendy with being knowledgeable.


Stop confusing an expense with an investment.



2418. Post 11369344 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

There is peak optimism at market topsand peak pessimism at market bottoms. Aprearantly we aren't pessimistic enough yet. Here, let me help:

dooooom!!



2419. Post 11369720 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Dilla on May 13, 2015, 10:41:49 PM
Just everyone waiting for bitlicense, ETF, and Gemini. More +/- 20 sideways bs

two sideways moves of 20$ can be just as profitable as one $40 move.



2420. Post 11402406 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Stevenirving on May 17, 2015, 04:16:28 PM
20 more pennies on bfx and we are going to 239 with the next pump!!

Dumbass. You even made your stupid prediction twice!



2421. Post 11402883 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Stevenirving on May 17, 2015, 05:54:23 PM
20 more pennies on bfx and we are going to 239 with the next pump!!

Dumbass. You even made your stupid prediction twice!
Someone fed me misinformation

Lame excuse. Misinformation is all around us. Why repeat it?



2422. Post 11403176 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on May 17, 2015, 06:27:52 PM
Good grief, if things stay this lifeless then this thread will go days w/ just pages of chartbuddy posting unmoving price charts. However, something should be happening tomorrow at least. I'd imagine this Swedish thing is popping up for a reason and perhaps there's demand waiting with baited breath.

It's not lifeless. It's stable. This is what we need. Bull markets end violently. Bear markets in Bitcoin end with a whimper. Another few weeks or months of this and it's off to the races.



2423. Post 11404112 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

The GDP of Sweden is ~0.9% of the world's economy. What's more, they are going to drop their peg to the Euro when Greece defaults and the Kron is going to skyrocket in value. Why would Swedes want our deflationary currency when they are going to have their own soon?




2424. Post 11404321 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Norway on May 17, 2015, 09:04:47 PM
The GDP of Sweden is ~0.9% of the world's economy. What's more, they are going to drop their peg to the Euro when Greece defaults and the Kron is going to skyrocket in value. Why would Swedes want our deflationary currency when they are going to have their own soon?


Sweden has a negative interest rate now. But the important thing is who are represented on Nasdaq Stockholm. It's not the average sweede. Sounds like that's what you think...

Sweden is at the zero bound because they are trying (and failing) to fight deflation. I don't think the average Swede or even most of the elites realize the Euro peg is untenable. So when the krona spikes, BTC will appear to go down in price, which will either make it appear cheaper and therefor more attractive or diving in value and therefor radioactive. 

What is crazy is that they have negative interest rates in the middle of a housing bubble. Sweden is going to be an economic basket case. That may actually be good for bitcoin, but it's far from certain.



2425. Post 11404423 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Quote from: Norway on May 17, 2015, 09:25:40 PM
The GDP of Sweden is ~0.9% of the world's economy. What's more, they are going to drop their peg to the Euro when Greece defaults and the Kron is going to skyrocket in value. Why would Swedes want our deflationary currency when they are going to have their own soon?


Sweden has a negative interest rate now. But the important thing is who are represented on Nasdaq Stockholm. It's not the average sweede. Sounds like that's what you think...

Sweden is at the zero bound because they are trying (and failing) to fight deflation. I don't think the average Swede or even most of the elites realize the Euro peg is untenable. So when the krona spikes, BTC will appear to go down in price, which will either make it appear cheaper and therefor more attractive or diving in value and therefor radioactive. 

What is crazy is that they have negative interest rates in the middle of a housing bubble. Sweden is going to be an economic basket case. That may actually be good for bitcoin, but it's far from certain.

Take a close look at this list before you make further bold analytic claims about Nasdaq Stockholms potential regarding bitcoin:
http://www.nasdaqomx.com/transactions/markets/nordic/membership/membership-lists

I asked a question. I made no bold claims. 



2426. Post 11406165 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

Where's our Sunday night pump?



2427. Post 11422270 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.15h):

in the last 24 hrs, oil (WTI) dropped twice as far as Bitcoin (3% vs. 1.5%)  

So in terms of oil, we're up :-)

and only 63,000 blocks (437 days) to go until the halving of the block reward.



2428. Post 11501214 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.16h):

This is what we do. Soak up the liquidity when there's too much, provide liquidity when there's not enough.



2429. Post 11501310 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.16h):

Quote from: GaliX on May 31, 2015, 11:11:33 PM
we broke every trendline.... This is never going to stay stable above 200$ for much longer... Just one big guy saying he is done is enough right now

Just one big guy jumping in and we're off to the races. Remember, if only millionaires bought bitcoins and they each bought only one, there still wouldn't be enough to go around.



2430. Post 11593279 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

What concerns me about dark pools is that someone at the exchange has access to the hidden orders and nothing can stop them from using that information on other exchanges.



2431. Post 11635869 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Does anybody really doubt this rally is Grexit driven?  I took a little off the table like a lot of people, but I think it's still got legs. The Cypress template suggests that there is still a long way to go as capital controls have not even been implemented yet.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-16/bitcoin-spikes-greeks-follow-cyprus-template



2432. Post 11637661 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Stamp just topped it's intraday high and has officially joined the party.  

edit: $255 on BFX, bitches!



2433. Post 11637718 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Quote from: Malin Keshar on June 17, 2015, 12:28:04 AM
It is as predictable as a clock.

Pump to 250 region, then make people panic and dump to 210-220 region, then repeat.

Sellin to buy again at 220

i sold a little also, but it would be foolish to sell all of it. one of these days the rocket really is going to launch and 10-12X the base is a normal range.



2434. Post 11639019 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on June 17, 2015, 05:54:41 AM
The price of Bitcoin is up hopefully soon pass the U$ 300

First, let's see if we can hold $250.

So far so good. If we can hold just a few more hours until the European open, we're golden. Greeks will take over and pump it over $260.



2435. Post 11639075 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: windjc on June 17, 2015, 06:10:16 AM
The next bubble will be the bubble of altcoins. Those, who know what they're doing, have already positioned themselves under select altcoins.

The excitement and crazy gains will be in the alts. Bitcoin will slowly implode on the weight of it's wasteful mining network. Speculators will stay away from bitcoin for the same reason - the mining network just siphons too much speculator money from the market. Some corporate fools will try to keep the bitcoin hype going, but nobody will eventually care. Money has moved into the bitcoin market mainly because of speculation, and the odds are currently very bad for everyone, because it's not even a zero-sum-game anymore, it's a game where the speculators have to feed large mining farms whose contributions are marginal in return.


LMAO.

Mining isn't wasteful. The more hash power, the harder it is to mount a 51% attack. This clown is a miner who can't compete, so he mines shitcoins and talks them up and bad-mouths the only crypto that's truly scarce.



2436. Post 11647476 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Who is dumber, people with their life savings in bitcoin, or people with their life savings in a Greek bank?



2437. Post 11652552 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

We haven't had two consecutive red candle days since May. I keep waiting to BTFD but no love for the bargain hunter  Sad



2438. Post 11656004 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

We're getting pumps at times of the day and week when we would normally be getting dumps. It's as if some whale has been watching the market and timing his buys with minimal slippage.

It takes only $900,000/day to buy the 3600 coins mined daily and support this price level.  We could easily get half of that just from Greeks who have no room left under the mattress to stuff Euros.

I agree with those who say that the Greek propblem is going to drag out, but I think that's insanely good for bitcoin. It will take time for the reality of Greece's fucked up situation to fully sink into the population and even longer for a substantial number of them to take rational action to preserve their capital and purchasing power. 

This is a disaster for Greeks and a bad situation for the whole Eurozone, but I won't be in a position to provide the BTC liquidity they will need if I don't stay loaded up now, so I'm hodling. 

I wish we could wait until after the final USMS auction before the next bubble, but I don't think the market will wait that long. I won't buy any moar unless there is a dip into the $230s, but I sure as hell ain't gonna sell any moar unless i have a reasonable chance of buying my coins back lower. Time to wait and see.



2439. Post 11656598 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 19, 2015, 03:55:33 AM

you're right the everyone in the Eurozone should act now(they won't they will all act slowly one by one.. until it's kinda too late and then suddenly everyone wants in...), i really don't think once greece is toast  that will be the end of the euro's troubles?


Well, yeah.  Greece is the canary in the coal mine. Several large countries have debt to GDP ratios that are essentially unfixable given political realities. If Greece successfully exits the Euro and after a brief but severe economic downturn then recovers, those other countries will look to it as a model and then do likewise. If Greece gets a deal with the Troika to write down some or all of its debt, then those other countries will demand similar deals and the Eurozone couldn't survive that much of a debt write-off. 

Either way, it's not just Greece that's fucked. It's the whole EU.  They will print Euros like crazy, but then capital will flee to more stable currencies, PMs, etc.  Imports into the Eurozone will become more expensive until the strong countries will either demand to kick out the weak countries or leave on their own to revert back to old national currencies.  The monetary union is doomed and I see no way around that eventuality that is even remotely likely. It's only a matter of time. 



2440. Post 11676249 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: Coinshot on June 21, 2015, 02:59:44 PM
Well I invested 1500$ in Bitcoin since last March or so. Now i'm nearing 1000$. I've not made a penny.
I think i'm ready to quit trading. I'll never get that money back. I dunno how one could loose so much so fast, even if one is totally inexperienced, it seems one would make money at least 50% of the time. But i've made money something like 2% of the time. I just don't have the patience for this.

Use a cold wallet and forget your BTC, in a few years you will read that 1btc=20k$ and you could sell it

Or your coins might end up in the wrong chain of a Bitcoin's hard fork and worth next to 0 in the future.

Put in cold storage is OK, but forget and take for granted they'll be worth a fortune in the future in my opinion is a mistake

Do you not know how a hard fork works? As long as the coins were acquired in a block before the fork, they are safe. Then you just wait to see which fork become the main chain and you're good to go. A forked chain is inherently unstable and one of the forks quickly dies, leaving one chain. It's an inconvenience more than a problem. Worst case scenario: in the extremely unlikely case that neither fork dies and the value starts to plummet, (double)spend the coins in both forks! 



2441. Post 11702077 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

unbelievable: all he financial newsmonkeys were reporting a "deal" in Greece, but there was only a tentative agreement on a framework for negotiations, which has since gone to shit, as anyone following this drama was not surprised by at all. 

This problem is unfixable. All the key players know this. The only issue is if the can is still kickable. If Tsipras caves, he loses his job. If he doesn't, Grexit happens and loses his job anyway. The troika can't cave because writing Greek debt down means writing down Italian, Spanish and Portuguese debt also. Everybody is stalling for more time, but time for what? A miracle? Europe is limping towards the abyss until the currency and bond markets will push them over the edge. 

Liquidity suppliers, we need to be ready.



2442. Post 11702546 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: tarmi on June 24, 2015, 01:43:55 PM
keep dreaming about greece.




Capital controls are coming. Greeks are loaded up on physical cash. If you run a business in Greece and depend on foreign suppliers, How will you pay them? You're gonna find a seller on localbitcoins.com and trade those euros under your mattress for BTC.   



2443. Post 11703741 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: aztecminer on June 24, 2015, 04:36:09 PM
keep dreaming about greece.




Capital controls are coming. Greeks are loaded up on physical cash. If you run a business in Greece and depend on foreign suppliers, How will you pay them? You're gonna find a seller on localbitcoins.com and trade those euros under your mattress for BTC.   



hey billyjoe.. have you still been buying moar ??

Not lately, but I'm still margin long (if only slightly).



2444. Post 11731126 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

When snap elections are called, vote Andreas Antonopolis for PM or at least Fiance Minister.



2445. Post 11731530 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

My strategy of waiting until the Saturday night dip to grab bargains hasn't been working too well lately. There was only one case on two consecutive red candle days in the entire month of June (so far). I think I'm going to have to start buying every $15 dip.




2446. Post 11731646 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

dips on the five minute chart keep getting smaller. In spite of the dropping volume and the time of day/week,  think it's fixin' to pop higher. I hope not. I want to reload from my sell @  $157 on June 16.



2447. Post 11753884 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

It doesn't even matter if Greece leaves the Euro. They defaulted on their IMF loan today which means they are out of the capital markets. The bank run will continue because the banks are now insolvent. They cannot remove the capital controls because capital will flee like rats out of a sinking ship.

So if you're  Greek business owner, how do you pay your foreign suppliers? THAT's what's going to fuel the rise and BTC will be up hundreds if not thousands.

When the Greek banks reopen (next Tuesday so they say),You are going to see an informal market where Electronic Euros will trade at a discount against Paper Euros, because the money will leave the country in the only ways it can, not because of fear, but because Greeks have to buy the things they need and those things are outside of Greece.

A tiny few at first will see the benefit of Bitcoin for this purpose, but that number will grow until the trickle becomes a mighty torrent.



2448. Post 11754009 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on June 30, 2015, 01:07:19 PM
It doesn't even matter if Greece leaves the Euro. They defaulted on their IMF loan today which means they are out of the capital markets. The bank run will continue because the banks are now insolvent. They cannot remove the capital controls because capital will flee like rats out of a sinking ship.

So if you're  Greek business owner, how do you pay your foreign suppliers? THAT's what's going to fuel the rise and BTC will be up hundreds if not thousands.

When the Greek banks reopen (next Tuesday so they say),You are going to see an informal market where Electronic Euros will trade at a discount against Paper Euros, because the money will leave the country in the only ways it can, not because of fear, but because Greeks have to buy the things they need and those things are outside of Greece.

A tiny few at first will see the benefit of Bitcoin for this purpose, but that number will grow until the trickle becomes a mighty torrent.

What we need to do is to get the word out to Greek businesses:
Pay your foreign suppliers with Bitcoin



2449. Post 11754224 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: rebuilder on June 30, 2015, 01:46:51 PM
What we need to do is to get the word out to Greek businesses:
Pay your foreign suppliers with Bitcoin

How do they get the BTC? Cash seems in pretty short supply. They can transfer EUR within the country by bank transfer, but who'd accept that as payment?

(Is there a market for IOUs backed by greek bank deposits yet? I wonder what the going rate would be...)

You'd get cash by paying a premium: exchange 1000 Euros from your bank account to the account of Greek with 900 Euros paper cash. Then you'd take that cash and put in in the BTM in the North Athens bookstore in exchange for BTC. Or buy on localbitcoins.com.



2450. Post 11754423 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: macsga on June 30, 2015, 02:02:30 PM
What we need to do is to get the word out to Greek businesses:
Pay your foreign suppliers with Bitcoin

How do they get the BTC? Cash seems in pretty short supply. They can transfer EUR within the country by bank transfer, but who'd accept that as payment?

(Is there a market for IOUs backed by greek bank deposits yet? I wonder what the going rate would be...)

You'd get cash by paying a premium: exchange 1000 Euros from your bank account to the account of Greek with 900 Euros paper cash. Then you'd take that cash and put in in the BTM in the North Athens bookstore in exchange for BTC. Or buy on localbitcoins.com.

Not that easy when you're forced to withdraw only 60Eur per day just for your basic needs. Still the idea is legit and stands as an alternative but for other kind of "investors". There's a huge amount of money moved out of Greece since 2010. Those money are fully functional and could be used for buying BTCs. Then the process would work inside Greece from localbitcoins and/or P2P transactions.

In the free market, every problem is an entrepreneurial opportunity for somebody.  Both parties are always better off because it's a voluntary transaction that otherwise wouldn't take place. That's what morons like Tarmi can't wrap their tiny little brains around.  



2451. Post 11759676 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

The decentral bankers of bitcoin once again find ourselves out of a job. Stability has been achieved.




2452. Post 11768999 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Quote from: spooderman on July 02, 2015, 03:33:15 AM
in times of economic booms poeple have more money and feel rich enough to buy some bitcoin as a risky speculative investment
in times of economic busts  poeple have less faith in fiat and start looking for ways out of the dollar and find bitcoin
how can we lose?  Grin

in times of economic booms people have no need for bitcoin
in times of economic busts people have no money for bitcoin.

that's how Tongue

though I still think we'll win/are winning.

Somebody always has money in the busts. They guys who sold first and started the stock/bond/real estate crashes have money. Where are you gonna park it if you're worried about capital controls and depositor haircuts?



2453. Post 11784936 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

Long weekend after a big rally? Oh, yeah-we're gonna get a retest of $250. We don't want a rise that's too far too fast. That's unsustainable. We want a train slow enough to allow more people to jump on.



2454. Post 11809247 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

What happens if Greek banks don't reopen tomorrow? I'm giving them only a 15% chance of opening.

Those banks can't handle even one full day of withdrawals. depositor's haircuts?

What happens after banks are closed for two weeks? Civil unrest? riots?

"OXI" on the referendum is not the end of the story. It's just getting started.



2455. Post 11847818 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

It figures. My sell order was at $296.62 missed the top by 52 cents. This keeps happening to me. Look people, we don't have a central bank so it's up to us day traders to keep the price stable enough for bitcoin to be usable as a currency. if it jumps up 10% in a day, sell. buy when it retraces 5%. don't let it rise too far too fast. It's unsustainable, draws in the wrong crowd and drives out more cautious investors. 

I would be happy to see consolidation in this range for a few days before the assault on $300.

Remember, you have more money to buy the dips if you sell the spikes.



2456. Post 11875819 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

What is the reason to think the Greek Parliament will pass the reforms? and if they can't get the votes?

Nothing is over.



2457. Post 11891206 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Ivanhoe on July 15, 2015, 11:00:49 PM
I care nothing of Peercoin I just know a Litecoin drop doesn't imply BTC is to follow.

told you so  Sad
This drop has nothing to do with Litecoin, but with the yes vote in the Greek parliament.

Edit: Or to say it better, with traders who value bitcoin lower because of the yes vote. We soon know how many of them there are Wink

Clearly the parliament in Greece values their banks getting re-opened more than the will of their own people. This is similar to what happened in the U.S. in 2008.  For the record, I think the Greeks a s a group have had it far too easy and their high tolerance for corruption have gotten them into this mess. Nevertheless, it's more proof that democracy isn't working. I would even go so far as to say it can't work for long.

The yes vote does not automatically mean the banks will re-open soon if ever. There are still conditions that need to be met. Even if they re-open, I suspect some clever Greeks will use their deposited funds to buy bitcoin.  The blockchain has no bank holidays. No capital controls.

I don't really care much if the price dips a little more. I literally have thousands of dollars on the exchange already just in case that happens.



2458. Post 11902767 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

I've figured out how to trade a random walk. You spread out your bids and asks on either side of the spot price. Every time an ask is bought, you move up your bottom bid one notch on top of your top bid. Every time a bid is bought, move down your top ask one notch below your bottom ask. if the market blows completely through your trading range, start walking your bids up or your asks down until you're back in the game.  

The money is made on the round trip. You can't book a profit until you sold back what you have bought or bought back what you sold.

If your'e bearish, buy back at a slightly lower price than you sold. If you're bullish, buy back slightly higher or slightly moar. Either way, we can fleece the manipulators at minimal risk. Just don't use more than 2X margin or you might get squeezed.



2459. Post 11903286 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: aztecminer on July 17, 2015, 02:48:39 PM
I've figured out how to trade a random walk. You spread out your bids and asks on either side of the spot price. Every time an ask is bought, you move up your bottom bid one notch on top of your top bid. Every time a bid is bought, move down your top ask one notch below your bottom ask. if the market blows completely through your trading range, start walking your bids up or your asks down until you're back in the game.  

The money is made on the round trip. You can't book a profit until you sold back what you have bought or bought back what you sold.

If your'e bearish, buy back at a slightly lower price than you sold. If you're bullish, buy back slightly higher or slightly moar. Either way, we can fleece the manipulators at minimal risk. Just don't use more than 2X margin or you might get squeezed.


yo billyjoe.. you should know by now the intrinsic crash is about to happen.

Then there will be MOAR COINZ FOR ME!!



2460. Post 11904016 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: generics on July 17, 2015, 05:17:28 PM
What's happening to BitFinex. Chart & Order froze

I dunno, but the API is still working. trading about $2 lower than where it froze on me.



2461. Post 11911289 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

I'd like to see us drop to $272 a couple more times. I want MOAR COINZ!



2462. Post 11912535 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: gentlemand on July 18, 2015, 09:11:04 PM

There are plenty of cheap and nice islands up for purchase in South-East Asia. Hell, I own a part of one in the Philippines. Yes it can be a hassle legally and you cannot always outright own the place but if you have money there are ways around  Wink

Panama seems to be a hotspot for island bargains. However a few buyers have arrived to find their very own surprise populations. I presume under those circumstances you're fully legally entitled to auction off the hunting rights to depraved Wall Streeters.

Property rights are confusing when titles aren't on the blockchain. At some point in the future it won't just be bitcoins, it will be everything: If it isn't on the blockchain, you don't own it.



2463. Post 11912660 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: shmadz on July 18, 2015, 09:00:23 PM

Australia? Well, some islands will be more expensive than others...

Apparently, there are Approximately 180,497 available islands in the world. -> https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090510184804AArokSM

That means an average of 21,000,000/180,497 = an average of =116.3454240237 per island.
Keep in mind this does not take into consideration that some islands will be with more than others ( see Australia ) or that bitcoin might be used for other things than buying islands. For example, yachts, Ferraris, castles, etc...

I still harbor hope that for a princely sum of 50 or 60 bitcoins I might someday be able to buy my own island. I do not imagine it might be as nice as some of those depicted.


 http://www.privateislandsonline.com/islands/near-batteau-island

More like that, I suspect.


We all like to dream of spending our bitcoin riches on exotic toys, but this is capitalism. The idea is to take profits and use them to purchase working capital such as farmland, tools, or machinery to increase our productivity so that we will have the income to buy back the coins during the next sustained downturn.

Bitcoin, like all money, is an abstract representation of capital. We support an inflationary type of money because it DISCOURAGES consumerism and encourages capital formation (savings). 



2464. Post 11921661 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on July 20, 2015, 05:45:28 AM
you miss 120 if you dont pay electricity (just the internet and maintenance) btw its quite difficult to find free electricity these days  Grin

There is no free electricity, of course; only electricity that someone else does not know he is paying for.  Grin

Why Professor, that sounds downright libertarian of you!



2465. Post 11921672 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Kinda pissed my $273 bid was missed by 50 cents. Maybe I'll get lucky and there will be some more idiot dumpers. Or I could move it up a little. Haven't decided.



2466. Post 11939176 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

500 coin dump on BFX and the price goes...up? I moved my 273 buy order up to 274.4 and i still miss by like six cents! comp on, dumpers. Daddy wants your coinz.

[fixed]



2467. Post 11939317 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Every day is one day closer to the halving. One day closer to the next ATH. I've started banking my trading profits in BTC instead of dollars. We'll never see $220 again.



2468. Post 11939449 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: bassclef on July 22, 2015, 03:48:26 AM
Watch those shakeouts boys, they always come when you least expect them. The more nervous they make you, the more effective they are. Looks like this one is good to buy.

Don't say that! I still have a bunch moar coinz I want to get on the cheap. I gotta get the liquidation price on my margin long up to the triple digits.



2469. Post 11943104 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: aztecminer on July 22, 2015, 12:39:57 PM
Every day is one day closer to the halving. One day closer to the next ATH. I've started banking my trading profits in BTC instead of dollars. We'll never see $220 again.


please explain.. what is keeping bitcoin from seeing 220 again ?? what is your idea why that is ?? just the halving is the reason why u think that ??

Bitcoin has the attention of the big fish now, guys like Bill Gates who are looking for an entry point. The Greek runup injected some FOMO into them. The VCs and anyone else who wants to stake some real estate in the most secure blockchain in the world provide the support and the poor schmoes in countries with unstable currency regimes will provide the dumb money to push new highs.  Mexico is going to shit again. over 16 pesos to the dollar and that remittance market is potentially huge.




2470. Post 11943482 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: aztecminer on July 22, 2015, 03:23:29 PM
if we look at ltc halfing and price increase, btc should be 500 usd by next year... its also fit the cost to mine 1 btc  if difficulty was doubled today.
off course price would be more relevant with demand. so i hope btc demand will be rising next year  Grin



what we learned from LTC halving is that we will see some poor chaps lose their bitcoin profits on leveraged exchanges when someone loses $80k in a leveraged pump or whatever it is they do when bitcoin gets pumped and then suddenly dumped. at least that is what i learned from LTC halving so far.. i am never going to a leveraged exchange because of that. i feel it is "me against the music" when comes to bitcoins and cryptos.

Leveraged exchanges are where we take the money from gamblers.  Luck plays a part, but over time money flows from the dumb to the smart. We want bitcoin in the hands of smart people.



2471. Post 11943525 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: findftp on July 22, 2015, 02:54:06 PM
Every day is one day closer to the halving. One day closer to the next ATH. I've started banking my trading profits in BTC instead of dollars. We'll never see $220 again.


please explain.. what is keeping bitcoin from seeing 220 again ?? what is your idea why that is ?? just the halving is the reason why u think that ??

Bitcoin has the attention of the big fish now, guys like Bill Gates who are looking for an entry point. The Greek runup injected some FOMO into them. The VCs and anyone else who wants to stake some real estate in the world provide the support and the poor schmoes in countries with unstable currency regimes will provide the dumb money to push new highs.  Mexico is going to shit again. over 16 pesos to the dollar and that remittance market is potentially huge.



Lol, Bill Gates and all his friends are already in, for years.
They only troll you to believe they aren't already.

Well, maybe they have some white cash to put into it to boost their black money profits.


Sure they're in, but these guys have enough cash to really goose the price if they increase their stakes.  Nothing succeeds like success and the Greek pop was a big success. 



2472. Post 11954813 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Ahhh, stability. This is the way a currency should perform. The decentral bankers are #winning.



2473. Post 11957243 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Kanapka on July 24, 2015, 12:37:52 AM
whats going on with this countdown?

You know, people need posts for their signature campaigns and to increase their activity

And I think yesterday was the most stable day of Bitcoin, less than $2 of variation of price, if you look at CoinDesk BPI

Sideways long enough generally means up. Every day is one day closer to the halving. Every day at $276 makes $250 psychologically seem more like cheap coins.  If the bears don't make their move soon, the may miss their window of opportunity. 

 



2474. Post 11959780 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on July 24, 2015, 03:47:30 AM
whats going on with this countdown?

You know, people need posts for their signature campaigns and to increase their activity

And I think yesterday was the most stable day of Bitcoin, less than $2 of variation of price, if you look at CoinDesk BPI

Sideways long enough generally means up. Every day is one day closer to the halving. Every day at $276 makes $250 psychologically seem more like cheap coins.  If the bears don't make their move soon, the may miss their window of opportunity. 

 

You're welcome. No need to say thanks by sending some coin to the address in my sig.



2475. Post 11960113 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

possible bull pennant forming.  hold onto your butts.



2476. Post 12022442 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

I've been a bag holder since the price was ~$10/BTC. Boy do I feel stupid. That 18 months I was underwater in 2011-2012 actually caused me to sell some, but not this time.

That stash I have in cold storage, it isn't going to get smaller. It's going to get bigger until I am almost certain I can sell and buy back in at a lower price. That will be the next bubble, sometime before or slightly after the halving next year.  Every day is one day closer to the halving, and so many stupid miners are selling everything they mine. Thanks for that. I mean, I know you need a ROI for your hardware and electricity, but you're making it pretty easy for me to increase my holdings.  Maybe you and Laszlo can share a pizza and gloat about all the suckers buying your coins. and when the block reward gets chopped in half and difficulty makes your asics obsolete, you'll have memories and and a few bucks in your pocket, but what you won't have anymore is positive cash flow. I'll have all your coinz, bitches. I don't need BTC income. I've got two jobs and I guarantee I can wait you out.

You assholes that are jealous because some of us got in early, you don't know what it was like to HODL.  We have piles of coins you can only dream about, but we got them before there was any infrastructure, before we even knew if we would be considered criminals for owning crypto. Before smart contracts and multisig wallets. We had faith. Faith in the laws of supply and demand, marginal utility, comparative advantage. And if we didn't have patience, we acquired some along they way. So if you want a wider distribution of crypto wealth, I suggest you stop crying about "early adopter luck" and take some intelligent risks.  People thought I was crazy for buying in at $10 when the price had only recently been under a buck, and for a year and a half, they were right.  But I don't regret buying in at $10. I regret not buying MOAR when it crashed to $2. 




2477. Post 12029195 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on August 01, 2015, 09:34:15 AM

He is just hurt because once he was, like, a gazzillionaire. And he watched, sitting in front of his computer, 40oz in hand,  as it all disappeared because "HODL"...


If you sold on Tuesday at 295, you could now buy back at 280.  A nice 5%* windfall.

But thats retarded, right?  Assholes, right?


* Your mileage will vary

and if you sold a week ago at $275, you'd still be out of the money. It didn't all disappear. I'm still up a few thousand percent.  Nobody knows the future. We deal in probabilities.



2478. Post 12030638 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

$275 support seems to be holding.  We may have found a new floor, gentlemen.



2479. Post 12031016 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

C'mon, bears. That's all you got? If you've run out of coinz, try shroting. You're so close to busting thru that support.  Five red candle days in a row and you can't even sink the price $25??




2480. Post 12034081 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Is the weekend sale over? I was promised $275 coins!  That wasn't even a decent assault on support. C'mon, teddy bears. Gimme yer coinz. 3600 get mined every day taking almost a million new dollars daily just to support the price. BTC swap costs are next to nothing and you have a full 360 days until the halving, so what are you waiting for?

You wanna be patient and regroup for the next attack? Fine. I'll wait for you. Just remember that each coin you sell at $280 is one less coin you can sell at $270-275. 



2481. Post 12034970 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

somebody's putting in a bunch of asks far enough from spot that they won"t get triggered. Then buying at spot, moving the asks higher rinse and repeat. an assload of coins are being bought from the defenders of the support line taking profits too early.



2482. Post 12036702 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: jbreher on August 02, 2015, 07:55:29 PM
At least for me it seems the world is not really ready/interested in Bitcoin but much rather they are interested in the Blockchain behind it.

It seems this way because news outlets are reporting the proclamations of bankers, as if having more authority than the opinions of a band of ragtag technologists and libertarian amateur economists. Bankers, for their part, are interested in blockchain technology and not Bitcoin itself, as they want the cheapness of decentralized ledgers while maintaining insulative control that allows them to create money at will.

Quote
But in the current form of Bitcoin as a currency is not the valuable thing... The Blockchain is the valuable thing.

Yes. The Blockchain (I note you accorded it proper noun status) -- the specific blockchain attached to Bitcoin -- is the valuable thing. Banks have a major challenge ahead of them trying to create a separate blockchain under their control, that is secure against 'incursions', when Bitcoin's Blockchain is already secured with the largest collection of computing power that humanity has ever amassed against a single problem.

Bankers as a rule are stupid. It may take them quite a while to figure out that their blockchain is worthless unless somebody pays the miners.  I may talk down about miners occasionally, but they are necessary. Also, the age of the ledger gives it added legitimcy, and no crypto ledger is older than bitcoins. As you say, it's the difference between a record of a transaction and THE record of a transaction.



2483. Post 12036845 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

only about 5K coins to dump to get to $275. Think it'll get touched by the Chinese panic monkeys tonight?  I'm thinking dumpers are out of coins to dump, but I've been really wrong before. I may be margin long, but I still have some dry powder just in case they take one last good whack at support.

oops, another big buy. I see the bears opportunity slipping away.  maybe resistance will get tested first.



2484. Post 12038383 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

the volume of this completely expected bear raid is pathetic so far. I may not even get a piece of it if I don't move my buy orders up enough. No, I'll wait.  Miners gotta dump their 3600 coins a day.



2485. Post 12038421 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: criptix on August 03, 2015, 02:09:49 AM



On a serious side note, if mark gets jailed in japan... well even he doesnt deserve that...

oh, I think he does.  The lives he ruined is one thing, but he caused more damage to our project than any other single person. Bitcoin may be the only thing that saves our children from living in a vastly poorer world. If it is, and mass adoption was delayed by about a year or two because of him, the loss of potential benefit is incalculable.



2486. Post 12039006 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: bclcjunkie on August 03, 2015, 04:15:27 AM
really? is that how you view centralized electronic currency such as bitcoin? don't you see how governments are pushing for electronic cash so that they can track you even more? no thanks, i prefer NSA and CIA to stay the f..ck out of my kids' life...






On a serious side note, if mark gets jailed in japan... well even he doesnt deserve that...

oh, I think he does.  The lives he ruined is one thing, but he caused more damage to our project than any other single person. Bitcoin may be the only thing that saves our children from living in a vastly poorer world. If it is, and mass adoption was delayed by about a year or two because of him, the loss of potential benefit is incalculable.

In Time. I love that movie and own a copy. Econogeek gold. Bitcoin is as traceable as you want it to be. I was meaning deflationary money that incentivizes savings will make the world richer while inflationary money is causing us to squander our resources.



2487. Post 12039151 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: rememberme on August 03, 2015, 06:39:38 AM
huge buys on finex Cheesy

~1k coins. a little more than a quarter of the coins mined today. What's important is that the other exchanges are following.



2488. Post 12062058 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on August 05, 2015, 04:23:38 PM
Reward has to halve. We might see a spike before then, but not much. Big move will be 6-12 months AFTER the halving, when all weak hands are gone, and any new investment will have to pry coins from the death grip of long time HODLERS.

Market rose before the last halving and will again this time. Markets are always forward looking. How many years does it takes to shake out all the weak hands?  No, it's gotta go sideways a bit more, but not that long.

So I think today is Magnum Day, ~357 to go before the halving.



2489. Post 12065858 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: Patel on August 06, 2015, 01:17:15 AM
We're gonna hit, or be very close to 255 during august.

Then 400 by the end of the year



Still seeing this outcome.

That would be nice, but I see the chart flattening out for a while. If BTC is seen as roughly tracking USD performance, then we will start to get a growing number of buyers from countries with weakening currencies.



2490. Post 12074610 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

3600 coins mined per day. 3600 X $280= $1,008,000/ day of new investment. In order to hold the price until the halving, that's ~$1,008,000 X ~355 days or ~ $357,840,000.  

That sounds like a lot of money, but it isn't. The estimated  one million unique wallet holders would only need to buy an additional 1$ worth of BTC per day even with no new buyers at at all. And there are new buyers. More every day.

Facebook bought what'sApp? for 19 billion. (about 4.5 times bitcoin's entire current market cap)


There's about 13 million millionaires on the planet. If each one buys on average only ONE bitcoin, even if nobody else buys ANY, then there simply won't be enough to go around.  




2491. Post 12074956 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

1K coin wall @ $276.07 appears to be real. Still has ~700 coins left.  This is a more respectable test of support.  Time will tell if it holds. I'm betting yes. Even if I'm wrong, I can't see us going down below $250 and I don't want to risk not getting my coins.

So far these bears are a bunch of pussies. I haven't even started using leverage yet.



2492. Post 12075046 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

We've been trading on top of the Cypress bubble for over a month. It's easy to let things slip down the memory hole, but at the time, price spiked from ~$16 to $260 and nobody thought that could possibly be sustainable. Kinda like to get my hands on some $260 coins now.



2493. Post 12081460 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: Richy_T on August 07, 2015, 06:52:05 PM

they are not going to raise interest rate.. that is just talk.. they talk about it to help the markets cuz everyone thinks if fed says they are going to raise interest rates soon then everything must be good ... but they can't raise interest rates.. if they did everything would implode.. they wouldn't be able to service the debt.. they will go negative interest rates before the ever go up again. they aren't going to stop QE either.. instead they outsource the QE.  i keep raising the bets... lol .

Very much this.

One week you're going to the cash advance to get money for hookers and blow.
Next week you're going there to get money for the rent.
The week after, you're going to the next cash advance down the road to get money to pay the first cash advance.

How many cash advances are there?

I agree. They will never raise rates. as for Cash Advances, I live in a town of about 12 thousand people. There are about 20 subprime lenders here. Possibly two dozen. I think we're already starting that third stage. As I was typing this, a panhandler knocked on my front door. WTI oil hit a $43 handle today and the "for sale" signs are already multiplying. it's worse than 2008. People here will sell there wives and children before their boats and pickups, but they are filling up the parking lot in the strip malls with vacant stores behind them.



2494. Post 12081524 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: knight22 on August 07, 2015, 07:35:00 PM
Why is it going up now?  Huh


lol.. what happened ?? can't get any cheap coins anymore ?? ........... answer: anti-gravity happened .

obviously i could be wrong, and manipulators tend to move opposite of the predictors to spite them (probably not this time though) ... but i think you won't see less than 275 anytime soon.

Naturally market should've corrected to 50 fib lvl atleast (~268$) or to 61.8 (~257$) before another leg up to 320-340$, thats why price fell to sub 280$ but willybot on goxobi just stopped it, this "market" is being totally manipulated by goxoby/okgox's bots owners. Considering incoming stock markets collapse i would say that we're gonna see some flat range until end of august and then hyped movement to ~370-390$.

people are calling the stock market to collapse for 2 years now... And so far S&P 500 is still in a strong bullmarket

Until it doesn't. FED is now talking about increasing interest rates and stop QE money used to pump up the stock market. Place your bet.


they are not going to raise interest rate.. that is just talk.. they talk about it to help the markets cuz everyone thinks if fed says they are going to raise interest rates soon then everything must be good ... but they can't raise interest rates.. if they did everything would implode.. they wouldn't be able to service the debt.. they will go negative interest rates before the ever go up again. they aren't going to stop QE either.. instead they outsource the QE.  i keep raising the bets... lol .

You can't inflate a bubble ad infinitum, thinking otherwise is pure fantasy. The FED know that. They will rise the interest rates because at some point they will have to and also because Wall Street will make a shit load of money out of that anticipated collapse.

They don't have to inflate indefinitely. For some it's just until the next election cycle. For some it's until they can cash out. For most, they just want to hoover every scrap of wealth in a desperate race to the bottom because they're baby boomers and they don't want anything left for Gen Xers and millennials except the smoking ruins of a formerly great civilization. 



2495. Post 12086073 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

So
the million dollar question is: is the the dumping over or does this weekend bring any deeper discounts?  Were the walls fake or are they just now invisible?  

I got out of my leveraged long @ $285 and now I'm just waiting until I get a better sense of market direction.
At least we're finally starting to see a real test of support.

EDIT: support failed.  how low can we go? Where will the new shorts cover?  I'm almost out of fiat, so I guess I'm just gonna watch.





2496. Post 12087856 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Hmmmmm. Crash, bounce, pause, spike. Looks like our friends the Four Punch Raiders are back.



2497. Post 12089357 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: White sugar on August 08, 2015, 08:19:51 PM
wtf caused this dump?

descending triangle pattern. it was pretty obvious when the cup and handle failed to complete.



2498. Post 12089539 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: Alley on August 08, 2015, 09:09:57 PM
Volume wasn't even that high really for a 4% drop.

What makes you think it's over? The Chinese haven't even awakened yet, and a huge storm is rocking China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong and could prevent funds from getting to the exchanges for days.

it's gonna go down another 3 percent.  One thing's for sure: whoever catches the bottom will make some quick money on the bounce.





2499. Post 12090102 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

If Huobi goes under 1600, all hell will break loose. They use ridiculous leverage over there and

EDIT: already happened. Hold onto your butts.



2500. Post 12090120 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on August 08, 2015, 11:18:53 PM
If Huobi goes under 1600, all hell will break loose. They use ridiculous leverage over there and

EDIT: already happened. Hold onto your butts.

Four Punch Raiders?

Bear raiders for sure. I don't think those guys control the market as much as they used to, but we'll see.

it's gonna be a long night.



2501. Post 12090199 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: inca on August 08, 2015, 11:23:11 PM
Down to 261 haha. Ridiculously thin orderbooks. Time to go cautiously long.

I've never seen a one minute chart go flat like that on heavy volume and then reverse. No, this will end with a big panic dump somewhere below. or float up and retest the $260 lows several times before finally reversing.



2502. Post 12090300 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

I think it would be hilarious if the ONE coin I bought at $260.7 was what stopped the crash. Somehow, I strongly doubt it.  That's why I have plenty of bids in the $250s and lower.



2503. Post 12091078 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

It's bizarre how there's no bounce at all. Hit like a sack of seed. 



2504. Post 12091230 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: cyclotronmajesty on August 09, 2015, 03:20:10 AM
250s coming?  Huh

I dunno, but the traders who shorted 3K BTC on BFX gotta be starting to sweat a little bit.



2505. Post 12091374 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: Ezmoneyezlife on August 09, 2015, 03:31:28 AM
It's bizarre how there's no bounce at all. Hit like a sack of seed.  

Because people are expecting 245-255$ as a bottom, but i would rather be concerned about 30.300.000$ of longs which havent decreased at all which means that we might see a cascade margin calls pretty soon if btc falls below 250$. Something really fishy is going on. Btw finex started this quick dump, not goxobi/okgox as they usually do it .

That's why I like to keep my leveraged longs with a liquidation price below $100. I think a long squeeze is a very low risk.  For example I as a long term bull keep most of my BTC in cold storage.Too many of us are hoping for a long squeeze so we can break those dusty old coins out and use them for leverage to double down.  That and some Big Money that is waiting for low prices.

Yeah, BFX leads the exchange pack now. 



2506. Post 12113579 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

The drop of the Dollar peg for the Yuan is an escalation in  the global currency wars where every country tries to export its way out of recession at the same time- which is of course impossible. 

What is notable is that the world economy is so screwed up by endless fiat money printing, neomercantilism and Keynesian economics that our wildly volatile experimental currency is being increasingly seen as a safe haven asset.



2507. Post 12113871 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Why is Huobi offline?? the market was going WAY UP and then they went dead. I suspect somebody internally got caught in a losing trade and shut it down or somebody external got caught upside down with a big short and then launched a denial of service attack to save his ass.



2508. Post 12114049 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on August 11, 2015, 03:31:05 PM
Why is Huobi offline?? the market was going WAY UP and then they went dead. I suspect somebody internally got caught in a losing trade and shut it down or somebody external got caught upside down with a big short and then launched a denial of service attack to save his ass.

their order book seems to be going nuts but I don't see any trades on btcwisdom.



2509. Post 12117313 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

This has has everything to do with China dropping the dollar peg.  Currency wars (where every player tries to LOSE) are great for Bitcoin.



2510. Post 12118569 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

wow, that was unexpected.  $273 and now we're green on the four hour moving average.

I'm starting to feel that old bull FOMO again.



2511. Post 12126460 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Everyone was expecting a crash into the $250s, including me.  The longer it takes to get there (IF it ever gets there), the more resistance will grow. The whales swim a little closer to the surface. We are one day closer to the halving than yesterday.

Yes, there is way too much long leverage, but whoever attempts a margin squeeze of the bulls risks losing all of their coins and then some.  My positions are either long or margin long now.  

Printing presses are starting up all over the world for a currency war. Gold is climbing. Stock markets are teetering. Bonds are paying almost no interest and the dumb money is starting to realize that the smart money already left the building.  

Buckle up, boys. Big Money has been sitting in cash for months and now they know that not even THAT is safe anymore.  Throw in some fear of capital controls and we are looking at a brewing perfect storm for crypto.

We're not on the launchpad yet, but the crawler is inching us towards it. Ground Control is going through checklists. News crews are setting up cameras. It's coming.



2512. Post 12127164 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

It's likely to grind slowly down into the $230s (roughly), go sideways for a while, occasionally testing support  then work it's way up to the mid $300s before going back down, but not quite as low maybe $250s or $260s.

it will keep reaching higher highs and higher lows until it's obvious the main direction. and then liquidity will dry up and it will stair step much faster and steeper.

As day traders and decentral bankers, it's not our job to push the market in either direction. It's our job to punish volatility. To eat volatility. There's a lot of money to be made on the bounces on the way down and chopping the top off of peaks and then buying the dips on the way up.

You will make mistakes and a lot of it is unpredictable on a day to day basis, so don't use leverage any more than just a little. if price goes below your trading range,that's it. You're out of the game until it comes back up unless you have more fiat you can use. Margin calls can wipe you out and should be avoided at almost all costs. It's also terrible for bitcoin because the volatility gets crazy.

If you just break even, you're doing better than most traders. This is difficult and all we can do is play the probabilities.  It's much easier just to buy and hold, even if you have to hold and hold and hold until you're old.

I was upside down for over a year in 2011-2012. I looked like an idiot for about 18 months, but now I look like a genius because my buy-in was $10/BTC.  This is not a way to get rich quickly. Patience is much more important than brains. Almost every trade is a winning trade if you wait long enough. 



2513. Post 12127354 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on August 13, 2015, 03:17:17 AM
If billyjoeallen says we're going to $230 I'm highly considering selling and making a nice profit.

Battered bull syndrome.

Oh, I'm almost 100% long. I'm just not leveraged long. yet. Selling is extremely dangerous. I sold after the big crash a year ago and missed almost all of the run up to $685. I had to wait  several months for it to come back down to get back in. It was almost as bad as a margin call. 



2514. Post 12149405 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

What we are witnessing is the transition from a trader's market into a bull market.  It seems like everyone (including myself) are waiting for a dip to buy in or increase our holdings. Almost nobody is dumping, so we have to wait for the miners to sell enough to soak up the bids and grind the price lower. There seems to be a lot of resistance and a lot of support.

But every day we go sideways is one day closer to the halving. Every day new applications like Smart Contracts get closer to fruition. Every day, new use cases emerge and every day the fiat money printers print.

This griping about order books is amateurish.  I hide all my buy and sell orders as game theory dictates. Hidden orders are no more manipulative than visible orders that are fake.  Manipulators get burned just as often as they win and the net gain is zero. Big money can push the market around only for a time. Artificially low prices are a buying opportunity. Artificially high prices are a selling opportunity.  As always, position yourself so that time is your friend and not your enemy, then wait. You are almost sure to win if you don't get too greedy or get into too big a hurry.


Something just happened that nobody seemed to notice that is pretty big. Year over Year, Bitcoin is now outperforming crude oil. WTI has lost over 50% in the last twelve months and BTC has lost only 46%.  for the last quarter the bitcoin market is also, if you can believe this, less volatile.  What that means is that institutional investors now are starting to view crypto as a legitimate, respectable asset class.









2515. Post 12150662 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: Erdogan on August 15, 2015, 08:17:41 PM
Finex: "...but users who do not remove their cryptocurrency holdings from their Bitfinex accounts (or set up a locked withdrawal address) by 4:00 pm EDT on August 15th, 2015 will have their cryptocurrency balances exchanged to USD at market rates. "

We just passed that moment. I hope they don't dump all of it in a short time.



whatever the reason. I want my weekend discount. looks like I might get it. only a few hundred dumped so far, but the Chinese are snoring in their potassium cyanide contaminated houses, so we'll see.



2516. Post 12151243 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: klee on August 15, 2015, 09:22:55 PM
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010238.html
http://pastebin.com/Ct5M8fa2

Whoever wrote that is not the real Satoshi. I know this for the same reason I know that Dorian is not the real Satoshi. The syntax of the language is all wrong. The vocabulary, the phrases, the tone. It's bullshit.

The arguments for keeping block size small have all been addressed adequately.  They are not compelling.  There must be some real reason that the small bock size contingent is not wanting to reveal and it has everything to do with their own narrow self-interest and nothing to do with concern over the success of the project. 

price is down less that $4 over the fork. That's small enough so far to be statistical noise. I actually HOPE we get some real dumpage so I can increase my holdings, but so far nobody has hit the panic button. I suspect these small-size folks are in for a rude awakening re: how much power they actually have. 



2517. Post 12151326 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: shmadz on August 15, 2015, 10:07:27 PM

Ok, while I think it's great that "Satoshi" has resurfaced to fight the Gavinistas, I do think that the hard limit must indeed increase (perhaps to 2mb, maybe in a few years it could go higher?)

But the 101 proposal of doubling every couple years is pure insanity.

This is not just a ledger that might exist on a few select locations around the world. This is a ledger that should exist on every computer around the world. The best security or guarantee of authentic transactions is when as many as possible can hold and parse the full Blockchain. This will not happen if you just double by arbitrary rule instead of calculated increases decided by need.

That reminds me of the Statists who claim that government expenditures should be based on need. What is not said but logically follows is that whoever determines the "need" ends up with all the power. Let the market decide.



2518. Post 12151453 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: shmadz on August 15, 2015, 10:22:41 PM


But the 101 proposal of doubling every couple years is pure insanity.

This is not just a ledger that might exist on a few select locations around the world. This is a ledger that should exist on every computer around the world. The best security or guarantee of authentic transactions is when as many as possible can hold and parse the full Blockchain. This will not happen if you just double by arbitrary rule instead of calculated increases decided by need.

That reminds me of the Statists who claim that government expenditures should be based on need. What is not said but logically follows is that whoever determines the "need" ends up with all the power. Let the market decide.

The problem is that the market does not decide in this case. It's the "Hearn and Gavin" show that propose their decision. The market has no say, well... until the fork actually happens and then bitcoin and Gavincoin can trade freely against one another... that will be interesting.

something else that's interesting is that somebody just spent about 700 coins trying to punch through $263 support and got a bounce instead.  We need bigger blocks. everybody knows it. That's why we know the fork will become the main branch.



2519. Post 12151527 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: shmadz on August 15, 2015, 10:33:43 PM


I don't care, I want gigantic blocks.


Your post about boot strapping fiat currency in another thread was borderline brilliant, but this is just silly.

The larger the blocks become, the more difficult to secure the block chain. If there are gigantic blocks there is no incentive to pay any fee, also no incentive to block non fee payments.

Quote
“You see,” he said, “I don’t give a shit.”

Yeah, I got that feeling, I've had a few more than I should as well,  but I'm not gonna let you off so easily.

How do you propose to incentivize chain security as distribution continues to halve?

You talk like a miner. So to you and all the (other) miners, hear this: mining is a break even pursuit. It always has been and always will be. If it was profitable beyond all other opportunities, new miners would enter the competition until it became break even again. That's true for gold, silver, bitcoin, anything. The incentive is to do better than the average miner. That incentive will continue as long as there is any block reward at all, no matter how small.  Larger blocks mean more transactions mean more transaction fees, even if the individual fees are smaller, there will be more of them.

Quit crying that mining is hard and will shortly get harder. You know or should have known that when you got into this game.  In the free market, consumer is king. Miners are producers, not consumers. Get back to work or give up and let better miners take over. You need us. We don't need you. 21 is gonna have us all mining on our smart phones and wifi routers next year anyway.



2520. Post 12151653 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: shmadz on August 15, 2015, 10:51:54 PM


The problem is that the market does not decide in this case. It's the "Hearn and Gavin" show that propose their decision. The market has no say, well... until the fork actually happens and then bitcoin and Gavincoin can trade freely against one another... that will be interesting.

something else that's interesting is that somebody just spent about 700 coins trying to punch through $263 support and got a bounce instead.  We need bigger blocks. everybody knows it. That's why we know the fork will become the main branch.

I'm personally not against a marginal increase in block size. I think 4 mb would be sufficient for the next halving interval, and perhaps we could double each 4 years after that.

It gives reason to the decision: the allocations of new coins has been cut in half, so we double the available transaction space to compensate the miners.

You all need to remember that this whole thing exists on trusting that the Blockchain can not be violated, which means trusting the miners, which means the miners must be properly incentivized, or they will turn against the system.

You've heard the expression "don't bite the hand that feeds" ?? What do you think happens when that hand stops feeding and the one with the teeth gets hungry?


Yeah and Workers of the World Unite! Gimme a break with your commie talk. That gets no play here. The issue is not between a 8MB block and a smaller increase. It's about a block size increase or NO block size increase. It's your fault. There are no other proposals on the table, so we are forced to chose between Gavin's proposal or doing nothing.  Doing nothing is not an option.



2521. Post 12151858 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: shmadz on August 15, 2015, 11:18:41 PM

blah blah blah

something else that's interesting is that somebody just spent about 700 coins trying to punch through $263 support and got a bounce instead.  We need bigger blocks. everybody knows it. That's why we know the fork will become the main branch.

I'm personally not against a marginal increase in block size. I think 4 mb would be sufficient for the next halving interval, and perhaps we could double each 4 years after that.

It gives reason to the decision: the allocations of new coins has been cut in half, so we double the available transaction space to compensate the miners.

You all need to remember that this whole thing exists on trusting that the Blockchain can not be violated, which means trusting the miners, which means the miners must be properly incentivized, or they will turn against the system.

You've heard the expression "don't bite the hand that feeds" ?? What do you think happens when that hand stops feeding and the one with the teeth gets hungry?


Yeah and Workers of the World Unite! Gimme a break with your commie talk. That gets no play here. The issue is not between a 8MB block and a smaller increase. It's about a block size increase or NO block size increase. It's your fault. There are no other proposals on the table, so we are forced to chose between Gavin's proposal or doing nothing.  Doing nothing is not an option.

Lol, "commie talk" indeed, I should mine for you for free?

Fuck you, enjoy your fork, asshole.

Y'all are getting a million dollars a day. You call that free?Huh NObody thinks they get paid enough, but everybody thinks they pay too much for "good help". I work in an oilfield town. Most of the small business owners here ARE working for free now. You have to believe the industry will recover or cut your losses. it's a tough call, but the people who best anticipate consumer's future wants are the ones who profit. The good news is we are all consumers, so we generally have it better than those "worker's Paradise" places like Cuba, North Korea, East Germany and the former Soviet Union.

There's a name for people who tell others what they want to hear rather than the unpleasant truth: Politicians. There's a name for people who prefer pleasant lies to the truth: women.  I'm sorry you think I'm an asshole, Ma'am, but I'm not a politician.



2522. Post 12152078 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 16, 2015, 12:12:40 AM
Looks like Hearn's bankster-buddy handlers at Circle want to buy lower so they pushing hard for the PanoptiCoin and extended bitcoin turmoil.

Welcome back! I haven't seen you in a while. So what's the big deal about 8 mb blocks? It's similar to a difficulty increase and effects everyone equally, so why should anyone mind? If mining gets harder, that just prevents potential competition from entering the market, right? 




2523. Post 12152762 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: cyclotronmajesty on August 16, 2015, 03:08:26 AM
We've all seen 260 before.

Gavin's XT isn't anything new...

People still expecting 255... but it hasn't happened yet.

If you want sub 260 coins go to BTC-e.

I think it's time for a bull run.

5k to 255 or 5k to 288? I vote up.

Bitcoin isn't gonna die just because Gavin Anderson wants to kill it for his own name.

If the weekend sale is really over, then it looks pretty bullish. I really thought we'd go deeper, as $260 didn't seem like a strong support level. I've made no trades at all this week. Not enough volatility to punish.



2524. Post 12154012 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

put in a 30 coin long at $258. I think everyone was expecting $255 or lower. We still might get it, so that's why it's only 30 BTC. But I think the dumper underestimated support. We'll see.

10K coins to move 5 bucks.  Got yer coins, Bitches.



2525. Post 12156503 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):


Quote from: AlexGR on August 16, 2015, 01:34:15 PM
Can somebody explain this to me like I'm a 5 year old:

XT is supposed to make bitcoin futureproof, but how is it going to achieve that, when it can be spammed up to ~1.15gb / day, meaning that it'll take just 100 days for a determined attacker to increase the blockchain to +115gb, and around a year to take it up half a terabyte.


Terabyte hard drives are standard now. A year from now 5 TB drives will be standard. That's a worst case scenario and could still be easily handled. 





2526. Post 12157494 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: ronald98 on August 16, 2015, 03:03:12 PM

Can somebody explain this to me like I'm a 5 year old:

XT is supposed to make bitcoin futureproof, but how is it going to achieve that, when it can be spammed up to ~1.15gb / day, meaning that it'll take just 100 days for a determined attacker to increase the blockchain to +115gb, and around a year to take it up half a terabyte.


Terabyte hard drives are standard now. A year from now 5 TB drives will be standard. That's a worst case scenario and could still be easily handled.  




It's not only the physical sizeof the hard drive needed to store the blockchain that's causing problems. The length of time it takes to index the blockchain is getting longer as the size of the blockchain increases. That creates problems for anyone running a full wallet that needs to use it in a hurry if it takes hours, days, or weeks to index.


oh, right. Because bandwidth never increases and CPUs never get faster.  These arguments are bullshit. What's the real reason here?  is this FUD to drive the price down or is this some game of chicken between different factions to see who can rule That Which Cannot Be Ruled tm?



2527. Post 12159233 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 16, 2015, 06:51:57 PM
Ahahaha, it's a crucial time for everyone.
Every day is crucial for bitcoin during last 6 years. Nothing really new here.


Are we going to get another $10 to $20 downward adjustment in BTC prices before returning to the uptrend?

I have NOT sold, and I am just attempting to figure  out the best point to buy some more.  I already bought a bunch of BTC in the $260 range, so, maybe it would be nice to pick up a few more in the $240s, that is if prices are going to go into the $240s... Further, who wants to buy in the $240s, if they are able to get some coins in the $230s?

We're just above the Fibonacci retracement level of $255.  It will prolly get another test tonight. If it holds, we're going back up. I give it a 55% chance of holding. Keep in mind that we're only talking a maybe twenty dollar rally and then we will resume the plunge to possibly high $230s and then sideways for a month or two. Then up to ~$350 and then back down.

I know there is no way to predict this sort of thing, but this is how I see the price discovery going. So far I have had no surprises.



2528. Post 12160170 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

So somebody dumped 10,000 coins and the price moved ~ six bucks down, bounced back up five and is now holding steady half way up (or down depending on your point of view).  Put together with last weekend's more successful dump, that's 50,000 coins to move the price down ~$25 or 2k coins per dollar lower value.  And there seems to be diminishing returns.

He should write a book called "How to lose your ass attempting to manipulate the bitcoin market".

my guess is he borrowed those coins from some early adopter off exchange and now he is looking to trying to buy them back without moving the market up so much that he loses money. Good luck with that.



2529. Post 12161474 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on August 17, 2015, 03:18:39 AM
So somebody dumped 10,000 coins and the price moved ~ six bucks down, bounced back up five and is now holding steady half way up (or down depending on your point of view).  Put together with last weekend's more successful dump, that's 50,000 coins to move the price down ~$25 or 2k coins per dollar lower value.  And there seems to be diminishing returns.

He should write a book called "How to lose your ass attempting to manipulate the bitcoin market".

my guess is he borrowed those coins from some early adopter off exchange and now he is looking to trying to buy them back without moving the market up so much that he loses money. Good luck with that.
Got to give him credit for his timing though..He probably thought dumping 10k coins among forking/censorship controversy would trigger a cascade of closing longs.Too bad that finex wall ate his coins without flinching.Sometimes walls are real, kids.Don't run head first into them.


Yeah, that's twice now. The bidwall is damn real kids. Either the guy runs out of money, or he is laughing as you come to his prices. Errybody's got a limit tho... and why buy here when they'll sell to you even lower? Seems the max_blocksize controversy may have better gifts to give.

I love short sellers. Every short has to either cover and provide support or to get squeezed and spike into my sell orders.  We're seeing higher highs and higher lows on the daily chart, even if the moving averages look a little scary.  This fork controversy will get resolved eventually one way or another. Block size will be increased even with chain bloat because more and more of those "dust" transactions will be time stamps or colored coins representing title to something.  Processors are getting faster. Bandwidth is getting wider. Hard drives are getting bigger. It won't be an issue.

Meanwhile the fiat printers are printing, on-ramps for institutional investors are being built and the halving just gets closer.



2530. Post 12162168 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: cyclotronmajesty on August 17, 2015, 07:20:34 AM


I love short sellers. Every short has to either cover and provide support or to get squeezed and spike into my sell orders.  We're seeing higher highs and higher lows on the daily chart, even if the moving averages look a little scary.  This fork controversy will get resolved eventually one way or another. Block size will be increased even with chain bloat because more and more of those "dust" transactions will be time stamps or colored coins representing title to something.  Processors are getting faster. Bandwidth is getting wider. Hard drives are getting bigger. It won't be an issue.

Meanwhile the fiat printers are printing, on-ramps for institutional investors are being built and the halving just gets closer.

You're gonna hold out that long?

These are day traders... make a few bucks and short attention spans. I'd be doing that too but I see too much potential. I'd rather hold calm for a 200$ trade instead of bust a sweat for a 20$ trade. And miss out on the way up. But there is quite a bit of opportunity... for some reason people are still seeming indecisive...

Either that or the Bitcoins are just being spent in retail.

It's the 3600 coin/day inflation that's putting the downward pressure on price. What's amazing is that there has been an average ~$1 million/day being pumped in to hold the price ever since the $166 bottom last winter.  Miners are selling all or almost all they mine. You gotta love the Chinese. On a macro level, they sell stuff at cost and then lend us the money to buy it. No way that can end well. I'm not just talking about bitcoin. All their exports. If you think about it, Chinese miners are using subsidized electricity so it's actually the Red Chinese government that are providing us all these cheap coins.  It's the only thing China actually sells that prolly won't be worthless in five years.



2531. Post 12174204 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: becoin on August 18, 2015, 03:05:50 PM
Sure, this article is from the financial times.

https://www.evernote.com/shard/s78/sh/882fdac9-556c-482d-a0c9-c2c2456c185c/55d0920c48d621d3

"While Mr Andresen tries to prepare bitcoin for mass usage, he advises caution to investors. He holds thousands of bitcoins, enough to retire comfortably. But he has been cashing them in slowly, investing in stock market funds instead."

Somebody who is supposed to believe the future of his project should not be making such a nightmare of PR every time he speaks to the media.
This proves that Gavin has vested interest in decreasing the value of bitcoin and he abused his position as a Core dev to promote XT altcoin!

No, what it proves is that if even core developers are doubtful about the future that we are at disillusionment and very near peak despair, the bottom of the cycle. 



2532. Post 12174470 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: hdbuck on August 18, 2015, 03:11:58 PM
so there is a really really thin bid book on stamp...


I've said something similar to this before and got no legitimate responses. I think Stamp's orderbook is the most predictive of all the exchanges by a long-shot even though it's not the biggest.

Finex can have huge bid support yet the price still drops, but it seems like when Stamp has huge bid support the price actually stays supported or rises. The Stamp bid support started to wane once we fell back below 300 and has not recovered. I am patiently waiting for bids to overcome asks on Stamp before I buy anymore. So far this morning the Stamp orderbook has begun looking more bullish. Still have a long way to go though.

yes, i use stamp. finex could be dumping thousands within a blink. way too much bots there.

PS: finex now down to 13k btc instead of 20k..

The problem on BFX is the ~$30 million in margin longs that will all have to cover at some point. Most of those bulls have long since run out of fiat and so fees and interest are being taken out of their BTC and sold. This amounts to huge overhead resistance.  I'm margin long and when we got that pop up to $262 on Sunday, I took some risk off the  table. If everybody does that (and it looks like a lot of us are), It amounts to a massive downward ratchet. 

You are right if you think leverage can cause volatility but that's a profit opportunity for savvy traders, Yet leveraged short sellers can halt a crash when they cover.

You have to look at the picture long term. if you can stay solvent until a few months after the halving (about this time next year) without taking any profits at all, then you are in good shape.  Bitcoin doesn't have to out-perform the dollar in a world with negative interest rate bonds. It just has to out perform alternative speculative investments, payment systems, and title recording systems.  It's gotta flatten out before it goes back up to the moon. that will take months.



2533. Post 12175941 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: Theanos on August 18, 2015, 06:11:17 PM
so if 250$ falls we are in "This time it's still not different, dump it!!" no?

$250 is just a number, Newbie.  We tried to hold $300 last winter by using too much leverage and triggered a margin call cascade.  Painful lesson learned. We're not gonna do that again.  No, our goal isn't to stop the plunge. It is just to slow it down.  As long as we're not dropping as fast as Crude oil, copper, Brazilian Real, or whatever the hell the currency is in Malasia, we're doing fine.  And we are outperforming a whole bunch of other assets and securities now.



2534. Post 12176285 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-08-18/germany-struggles-too-much-renewable-energy

So Germany has an electricity surplus, huh? I wonder what they could do with all that power...



2535. Post 12176968 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: barbs on August 18, 2015, 07:49:30 PM
sub 250 on bitfinex will be interesting!

I'm out of ammo. Time to get the popcorn. I'll be force liquidated if they can crash it to $70 unless I can post more margin by then. 

Let's see if my $230s and then back up prediction comes true.



2536. Post 12177052 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Margin longs are going down, not up. $300,000 in dollar swaps closed.  Looks like we won't get another crash.

Just more $220-$320 range trading.



2537. Post 12177498 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

We now have four red candles in a row on the weekly chart. That hasn't happened since the crash last winter.

interestingly, we're still down less than 50% for the last twelve months which means we're STILL out performing WTI crude. Is oil dead?



2538. Post 12177773 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Boom

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-08-18/seeking-alternatives-1000-bitcoin-atms-are-coming-greece

Got yer coinz, Bitches.



2539. Post 12179340 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

fuck. me. I told you bastards not to use too much leverage.



2540. Post 12179348 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on August 19, 2015, 01:13:37 AM
I have that feeling bears will want to repeat sub 200$ in next few hours.

 yes, it's very likely. look at the volume. nothing like last winters crash. it's far from over.



2541. Post 12179446 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: podyx on August 19, 2015, 01:27:51 AM
I have that feeling bears will want to repeat sub 200$ in next few hours.

 yes, it's very likely. look at the volume. nothing like last winters crash. it's far from over.

You really think so?

hell if I know. But there's hardly any btc swaps on finex. We need those shorts to stop crashes. 

I don't know what to say to anybody who was encouraged by my bullishness. I took a mighty hit too. I may be a dumbass, but I'm a sincere dumb ass.




2542. Post 12179642 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: cyclotronmajesty on August 19, 2015, 01:47:55 AM
I have that feeling bears will want to repeat sub 200$ in next few hours.

 yes, it's very likely. look at the volume. nothing like last winters crash. it's far from over.

You really think so?

hell if I know. But there's hardly any btc swaps on finex. We need those shorts to stop crashes.  

I don't know what to say to anybody who was encouraged by my bullishness. I took a mighty hit too. I may be a dumbass, but I'm a sincere dumb ass.



I hate to say it but I'm beginning to think bitcoin is dumb. I'm inclined to agree with Edward Snowden. Obviously it's flawed. The concept is good, but this kind of price movement isn't so good for Bitcoin. I'm afraid the only people who actually profit from this game are scumbags. Amirite? Most of the miners are where again? And who keeps ripping off the USA's patents?

This is OUR fault. Mine as much as anybody's and prolly more than most. We were supposed to provide liquidity.  We are the ones who stabilize the price.



2543. Post 12179689 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 19, 2015, 02:16:45 AM
feels a lot like the action on the silk road take down flash crash (which began the major 2013 major leg up), like market is waiting for some "news" to flush out the last of the weak hands before hitting major bull mode ... and $161 on finex is now double bottom no?

no it isn't. it went LOWER than last winter's crash on far less volume. 



2544. Post 12179731 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: dreamspark on August 19, 2015, 02:24:55 AM
feels a lot like the action on the silk road take down flash crash (which began the major 2013 major leg up), like market is waiting for some "news" to flush out the last of the weak hands before hitting major bull mode ... and $161 on finex is now double bottom no?

no it isn't. it went LOWER than last winter's crash on far less volume.  

Hes talking about 2013 crash before $1000+ run up.


Check the similarities.

https://www.tradingview.com/x/IpLkPD8i/


lets hope so, I'm keeping my 2 BTC profit today in crypto not fiat and won't go margin long unless we test that bottom again.  I just don't know, but I'll let my house go back to the bank before I sell my stash. It's all or nothing for me and if I have to go down with the ship, so be it. This isn't just a speculative investment. We are trying to change the world and nobody said it was gonna be easy.



2545. Post 12179782 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: natewelt on August 19, 2015, 02:32:58 AM
Yeah seems like they created a lag to try and spread the market orders out a little bit. Similar to stock exchanges except most of the stock exchanges actually trip a circuit where they freeze and allow people to catch their breath before resuming trading.

It worked out well for me. I thought my market buys weren't going through so I kept buying and buying far more than I intended (after the bottom) I actually went from 30% margin long today to 160% long before I took profits. It's kind of like the small martingale betting pattern and You will lose your ass if you play it long enough. Sometimes it's better to be lucky than smart.



2546. Post 12179803 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: cyclotronmajesty on August 19, 2015, 02:38:51 AM
Price crashing again... Cry

Four Punch Pattern is a crash, a bounce, a pause (where we are now), a spike, a second bounce much higher up and then total loss of all upward momentum. This could be that pattern.

first the longs get squeezed then the shorts.



2547. Post 12189057 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

I see what's happening here. The miners are looking at losing half their block reward and they want to make it up in fees. So they are using the core devs to block ANY blocksize increase and the technical objections are an excuse.  I actually agree with Prof. Trolfi that they will find excuses no matter what.

Screw these guys. We don't need them. There's plenty of people who would rather mine for 12.5 BTC/block with BTC at $400 than 25 BTC/block with BTC at $150.

This is an attempted coup alright, but it's from idiot miners who want a bigger slice of a smaller pie. If we cave on this, they will never allow our network to become competitive enough to disrupt the banksters.

Fine. I'll call your bluff. Let's see you mine for $100 coins profitably. I've gone without revenue since 2013 and I can go years more. How long can you  mine at a loss?

Fuck. You. Scale or die.



2548. Post 12189279 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: AlexGR on August 20, 2015, 02:03:04 AM
This is an attempted coup alright, but it's from idiot miners who want a bigger slice of a smaller pie. If we cave on this, they will never allow our network to become competitive enough to disrupt the banksters.

Bloating the blockchain to DOA levels will disrupt bitcoin, not the banksters.

Besides, 8mb blocks, or even 80mb blocks, aren't enough to scale to such levels. You'd need enormous storage (and bandwidth) per day to compete with the volume of banks and credit cards.


so which is it, the increase is too big and too small at the same time?  We don't need to go head to head with VISA right now. We need grown up core devs who don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. 



2549. Post 12189439 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: coinpr0n on August 19, 2015, 10:32:23 PM
Suggested reading: http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/computing/networks/the-bitcoin-for-is-a-coup

Back clearly does not understand economics. Mining gets more centralized because of economies of scale. this is unavoidable unless you intentionally want to keep mining and our whole project as a hobby. Look at gold mining. At the beginning of the California Gold Rush, anybody with a shovel and a pan could make a buck. After the low hanging fruit all got picked,you had to invest more and more capital and have more knowledge and specialized knowledge.

Back's basically saying that he doesn't want to scale up at all, but if we are to scale up it should be as little as possible. He offers valid concerns, but in practice, that means that "reasonable" block size increase means no increase.  

Mining centralization is unfortunate and unavoidable but there is also limits to centralization in an open network. The barriers to entry are hardware efficiency, cost of hardware, cost of electricity, technical skill and other things like bandwidth.

Every single barrier can be overcome if the price of bitcoin gets enough. The same thing happened a few years ago when gold prices jumped so high that placer mining became profitable again. Smart rich people from lower margin industries come in and compete--But that WON'T happen if most bitcoin transactions go off blockchain because of economics.

Off blockchain transactions increase the velocity of money which has the same effect of increasing supply. You're not trading with bitcoin. You're trading with bitcoin IOUs.

MV=PQ   money supply times velocity equals price of goods time quantity of goods. How long before Coinbase starts operating as a fractional reserve or gets out-competed by someone else who does?

Supply and demand. Effectively increasing bitcoin supply drives the price down.  

Scale or die.






2550. Post 12189625 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: brg444 on August 20, 2015, 03:19:41 AM



Oh yeah. Economies of scale. Surely he hasn't heard that one before. Good on you to point this out.

I'd say you clearly don't understand english maybe? Did you somehow miss this paragraph ?

Quote
Adam Back: The worry with extremely large blocks is that they can be used to exacerbate a selfish mining attack. If you’ve got a large miner or a couple of large miners, they can create very large blocks and other people won’t be able to receive them or process them in time. So, they will gain an advantage in mining.

Bitcoin chose its parameters to make the advantage minimal so that it’s a level playing field between small miners and large miners. Right now, the interval between Bitcoin blocks is ten minutes. And the approximate time it takes to propagate, or send a block after it’s found, across the peer-to-peer network is about 10 or 15 seconds. You want the ratio between the propagation time and the block interval to be high enough, because, as a miner, while you’re waiting to receive a block, or while you’re processing a block to check it’s valid, you’re unable to mine. So, you lose money.

By having larger blocks, it’s going to take a longer time to process them. So, it’s going to favor miners with higher bandwidth or who are more centrally connected via high speed links to other miners. It gives them an advantage.

If you increase the block size rapidly, the level playing field is eroded. If it gets eroded too much, once miners are able to create blocks that only they and a couple of other big miners can mine, they can exclude everybody else because [other miners] can’t keep up.

The block size is there to put a check on these economies of scale and level the playing field.


You don't need that check and it causes more problems than it solves.  There's no such thing as a level playing field. Some miners get their electricity cheaper. Some live closer to a main internet trunk. Some are born with higher IQ. Some have more access to investment capital. Life isn't fair.  

It will take longer to process larger blocks, but bandwidth and processing speed increase all the time. The advantage is only temporary like any advantage in a highly competitive industry. If only big miners can compete, then become a big miner or sell out to one and become their employee. Effectively the only real barrier to entry is capital, BUT THIS IS CAPITALISM, BABY.  The only way to remove that barrier is to exit the free market.  That causes more problems than it solves.

I heard a whole lot of griping about mining pools, but now a larger block size will allow an individual large mine to compete with an entire pool, and you're not happy with that either!! 

Scale or die.






2551. Post 12189788 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on August 20, 2015, 03:54:21 AM


The economies of scale generally relate to power rates, and housing. Why not quality of network connectivity? Well, because of full node distribution, which may very well fall in the case of a precipitous blocksize increase. Seems like he's barking up the wrong tree in focusing on mining vs full node decentralization?


You can run a node for next to nothing!!  Hell I could do it myself on a $400 desktop PC and an extra $20/month in to increase my bandwidth. This extra cost is trivial. Yes, some will shut down at the margins, but many more will start up as adoption increases.  How low does the node/wallet ratio have to drop before it becomes a problem? a factor of ten or greater. A worry about a marginal decrease is simple fearmongering.

You're again making the perfect the enemy of the good. Grow the fuck up. It's like doctors at at operating table arguing about what pattern of sutures they're going to stitch the patient up with. Meanwhile, the patient is losing blood.

Scale or die.



2552. Post 12189990 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: AlexGR on August 20, 2015, 04:31:57 AM

Speaking of gold: Gold has been demonetized (ie, there are no gold coins in circulation as national currencies), so it's not like millions of gold transactions are happening every day. In terms of transactions per second, it's not very unlike Bitcoin. Yet, the ~5.8bn ounces / ~180 kilotons of gold have a marketcap of 6.5 trillion USD.

BTC is digital gold. It doesn't need to scale its transactions to billions per day for fear of death. You are only looking at the transaction aspect / epayment system aspect, and you are overlooking the store-of-value aspect.

The store-of-value aspect of Bitcoin benefits massively from the ability of any individual to run a full wallet, with the entire blockchain, and the individual being able to be their own banker and have their own bitcoins under their control, while these BTCs appreciate even from their ...non-use and scarcity, relative to the fiat money supply which is inflating and devaluing itself.

So which is it? You want smaller block size so we only use bitcoin for settlements or you want people to be their own banks? You can't have both.


Quote

Bitcoin, aside from being a coin and payment system, is also code that can be cloned/duplicated in altcoins... so it can scale if you make multiple bitcoin-like coins, use them for fast and cheap transactions and then discard them in the long run when their blockchain is bloated (if they can't be pruned). It's like using silver, copper and nickel for other coins that are traded daily, while you leave your gold coin under the mattress.

Right now we are using our gold for dust transactions of a few thousand satoshis and pretend that we need larger block sizes. This is ridiculous waste of blockchain space - which represents a barrier to entry as it increases in size (not to mention what happens when it increases dramatically, in terms of mining, centralization etc). Let the fees take care of this kind of waste and not multiply this wasteful behavior.


This is like the people who worried that browsers would clog up internet traffic back in the early nineties. or  worries about picture files. or sound files. or video.  1TB hard drives are cheaper than a carton of cigarettes. Next year 10 TB drives will be.  It's a bullshit argument.

Quote
Dogecoin, IIRC has 1mb blocks per minute, so, in that sense, it scales 10x compared to BTC - which is even larger than XT. But it's not like people are saying "hey the dog can scale like crazy, let's all buy the dog and go to the moon"...

I mean why hasn't anyone brought it up as a major selling point for altcoins like LTC (4x), DASH / DRK (4x), DOGE (10x) that they can scale much more than BTC due to their more frequent blocks (of similar size) if that's all it takes to overtake bitcoin, that will supposedly die from not scaling, while these coins have already "solved" that and thus they will scale much better?

If it was such an issue, the money would have already decided in favor of altcoins that are "better" than the "flawed" Bitcoin - which is also "flawed" with its very slow confirmations compared to most alts that are lightening fast when, say, you deposit into an exchange. But the reality is that the parameters of Bitcoin are known for years. People know that btc is more expensive in its tx's, that it's slower, etc etc, yet it is still dominating the crypto-market due to the store-of-value aspect which seems to be (to the market) more important than the transaction aspect.
 

The urgency isn't even in block size or scalability. The urgency is in fixing the goddamn decision-making process among the core devs.  You think Hearn was wrong about that?




2553. Post 12190080 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: shmadz on August 20, 2015, 05:16:26 AM

stop with the FUD and sloganeering ... bitcoin can scale just fine without the induced faux panic and manufactured fork missile crises circus (as much fun as the drama is).

No kidding.

Garzik's original proposal http://gtf.org/garzik/bitcoin/BIP100-blocksizechangeproposal.pdf  is a far superior solution compared to XT. These kind of proposals are the way bitcoin is supposed to evolve. You make proposal, everyone checks it out and makes suggestions and changes, you iterate this process several times until you've got something everyone agrees on.

But no, instead people want to push through an ill-conceived idea that involves 8GB blocks in twenty years along with whatever else is packaged into the XT client because Hearn says the sky is falling.

We've had sustained spam attacks for extended periods and as long as you're not an idiot and attach an appropriate fee, they don't affect you.

Bitcoin doesn't need to be dumbed down or compromised to achieve its primary goal; money that is outside the control of governments and central banks.

You're missing the point. It's not that bitcoin will die, it's that the devs who can't make a decision and the miners who oppose increasing block size ever will become irrelevant and effectively dead to the project.



2554. Post 12190142 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: shmadz on August 20, 2015, 05:25:33 AM

The urgency isn't even in block size or scalability. The urgency is in fixing the goddamn decision-making process among the core devs.  You think Hearn was wrong about that?


From an objective standpoint, looking at Hearn's contributions as a whole (the database change that caused the first fork, the redlisting coins proposal, and XT in particular) I think one could come to the logical conclusion that Hearn has been compromised by the NSA or some other three letter agency, likely recruited while he was still with Google.

You're not answering my question. Has the decision making process broken down or not? Has their even been a joint statement among the core devs regarding this controversy been issued? No, of course not. It's fucking embarrassing. Give us a time frame on when the block size patch will be implemented. something.

The beauty of Bitcoin is that we don't have to trust Hearn or Gavin or anybody. We trust the code. We trust a valid argument, no matter who makes it. Core devs need to get their shit together toot sweet. If it takes a hard fork to make that happen, so be it.




2555. Post 12190347 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 20, 2015, 05:45:37 AM

The beauty of Bitcoin is that we don't have to trust Hearn or Gavin or anybody. We trust the code. We trust a valid argument, no matter who makes it. Core devs need to get their shit together toot sweet. If it takes a hard fork to make that happen, so be it.



they're all getting together for a talk-fest, kumbay-aaah session and maybe a group hug at the end before satisfying your demands for releasing a joint statement ... and then they'll delay some more and have another talk-fest in Hong Kong in December ... no panic, no rush, just some measured think-sessions by the thought leaders.

So far I haven't seen any leadership among these "thought leaders". A time frame for a joint statement about a time frame does not exactly instill confidence. Last time we really had an urgent problem (backwards compatibility), Gavin took the reins and it got handled. If we had a similar crises, who would have the street cred to pull that off now?

If Gox taught us anything it's that no news is bad news. Miners want higher transaction fees and they will end up with a bigger slice of a smaller pie if this continues. They can't win but they can make us all lose. By opposing a block size increase for whatever reason, they limit the value of the coins they sell and I as one of their main customers will shop elsewhere.





2556. Post 12190454 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: hdbuck on August 20, 2015, 06:30:37 AM

https://scalingbitcoin.org/montreal2015/



Quote

Are any decisions made at the workshop?
Absolutely no decisions are made at workshops, as this would run the risk of being rushed and unfair to the global community unable to attend in person. The workshop is about raising awareness of issues and proposals, finding common ground, and encouraging public discussion within the existing mechanism of technical progress through the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal process.

gimme a fuckin break.  How many nodes will be running bitcoinXT by then do you think? Morons.




2557. Post 12196053 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: brg444 on August 20, 2015, 06:13:21 PM

That is all they got in the 0.022 years since the 8 MB XT code was released.  They have only  316'000 minutes left before the end of the year.  What a flop.

That's if we're to assume all these nodes are in actual XT-nodes  Wink

notbitcoinXT doesn't make any sense. if blocks are stamped with bitcoinXT, they contribute toward the 75% supermajority, correct?  why would anyone opposing XT want that supermajority activation triggered?

I lack the programming skills to see how this would slow XT adoption.



2558. Post 12197822 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

I wonder if too many people thinking the flash crash wasn't the bottom is actually what makes it the bottom. I doubt it. There's not enough BTC swaps on bfx, but hey who the hell knows?

If it is the bottom, it's because emerging market currencies are tanking and smart brown people will be buying as a hedge on inflation. That would be a good thing if we want this to be truly global.

Anyway, I'm trying to buy gasoline with purse.io and leaving this block size mess to better programmers (which is to say...programmers)




2559. Post 12198498 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: brg444 on August 20, 2015, 11:23:29 PM
http://shitco.in/2015/08/19/the-bitcoin-xt-trojan/

goat chiming in

It doesn't change the fact that the core devs have known about this issue for years and can't even come to an agreement on the direction much less the implementation of the scalability issue. Some are even arguing that we don't need to scale bitcoin at all because we can work around the limit. 

Consensus only works until it doesn't. Then leadership is needed. I'm as anti-government as it gets, but this conspiracy crap is getting ridiculous. It's trivial to flip the switch that allows TOR routing, so individual nodes can turn it on or off depending on their security concerns. 

Jesus Christ on a pogo stick, y'all are aggravating. I understand exactly why Gavin and Hearn released XT.

maybe Maggie Thatcher was right when she said "Consensus is the abdication of leadership."



2560. Post 12198651 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: brg444 on August 21, 2015, 01:33:28 AM

It doesn't change the fact that the core devs have known about this issue for years and can't even come to an agreement on the direction much less the implementation of the scalability issue. Some are even arguing that we don't need to scale bitcoin at all because we can work around the limit.  

Consensus only works until it doesn't. Then leadership is needed. I'm as anti-government as it gets, but this conspiracy crap is getting ridiculous. It's trivial to flip the switch that allows TOR routing, so individual nodes can turn it on or off depending on their security concerns.  

Jesus Christ on a pogo stick, y'all are aggravating. I understand exactly why Gavin and Hearn released XT.

maybe Maggie Thatcher was right when she said "Consensus is the abdication of leadership."


You know I thought about this a lot today and had quite some reflections about it on twitter.

The leadership you refer to, it reminds me of Hayek. Here is what he had to say on the matter:

Quote
We must here return for a moment to the position which precedes the suppression of democratic processes and the creation of a totalitarian regime.

In this stage it is the general demand for quick and determined central government action that is the dominating element in the situation, dissatisfaction with the slow and cumbersome course of democratic processes which make action for action's sake the goal.

It is then the man or the party who seems strong and resolute enough to "get things done" who exercises the greatest appeal.

"Strong" in this sense means not merely a numerical majority - it is the ineffectiveness of parliamentary procedure with which people are dissatisfied.  What they will seek is somebody with such solid support as to inspire confidence that he can carry out whatever he wants.

Are we forgetting history and just about to repeat it? I sure hope not.

You get Austrian cred for quoting Hayek, but nobody is using, threatening or advocating physical force be used or initiated.  Leading is not the same as ruling.



2561. Post 12198707 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: brg444 on August 21, 2015, 01:59:43 AM

It doesn't change the fact that the core devs have known about this issue for years and can't even come to an agreement on the direction much less the implementation of the scalability issue. Some are even arguing that we don't need to scale bitcoin at all because we can work around the limit.  

Consensus only works until it doesn't. Then leadership is needed. I'm as anti-government as it gets, but this conspiracy crap is getting ridiculous. It's trivial to flip the switch that allows TOR routing, so individual nodes can turn it on or off depending on their security concerns.  

Jesus Christ on a pogo stick, y'all are aggravating. I understand exactly why Gavin and Hearn released XT.

maybe Maggie Thatcher was right when she said "Consensus is the abdication of leadership."


You know I thought about this a lot today and had quite some reflections about it on twitter.

The leadership you refer to, it reminds me of Hayek. Here is what he had to say on the matter:

Quote
We must here return for a moment to the position which precedes the suppression of democratic processes and the creation of a totalitarian regime.

In this stage it is the general demand for quick and determined central government action that is the dominating element in the situation, dissatisfaction with the slow and cumbersome course of democratic processes which make action for action's sake the goal.

It is then the man or the party who seems strong and resolute enough to "get things done" who exercises the greatest appeal.

"Strong" in this sense means not merely a numerical majority - it is the ineffectiveness of parliamentary procedure with which people are dissatisfied.  What they will seek is somebody with such solid support as to inspire confidence that he can carry out whatever he wants.

Are we forgetting history and just about to repeat it? I sure hope not.

You get Austrian cred for quoting Hayek, but nobody is using, threatening or advocating physical force be used or initiated.  Leading is not the same as ruling.

I don't believe the "Final Solution" was included in the National Socialist party pamphlet either  Wink

Don't you think that's just a touch hyperbolic? Godwin's Rule is already in play?



2562. Post 12198810 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: btccashacc on August 21, 2015, 02:11:29 AM

are this another troll to down bitcoin price again ?

Just cripplecoiners griping about Gavin and Hearn cutting the Gordian knot of the Bitcoin Improvement Protocol process.   



2563. Post 12198888 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

I'll say this for Gavin and Hearn: I had no interest in ever running another full node again until this controversy.  If nodes proliferate so scaleforkers and cripplecoiners communicate their support and intensity of support, that's a good thing.




2564. Post 12199073 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: alesx.onfire on August 21, 2015, 03:01:55 AM
If Bitcoin survives this it will come out way stronger, there is however also a significant chance that block size issue will turn Bitcoin into a failed experiment.   

quoted from ArticMine, 2013.

Right. This isn't an existential threat (yet), but it does show just how long core devs have been squabbling and their inability to reach their beloved consensus.  I don't know the players or the code well enough to know who wants to scale slower and who is merely using this issue to obstruct any improvement, but the status quo clearly will not do.  I suspect Core devs have until the end of the year at the latest to release their counterproposal until the major players defect and go to XT.  If the price continues to tank, they'll have far less than that. 

 



2565. Post 12199095 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 21, 2015, 03:15:46 AM

Their data-mining revenue per scalp must have increased, or been assessed more 'valuable' Smiley

For every user they stick their probe up "for their own protection" (AML/KYC) they harvest an incredible amount of information that is like gold to the data vultures ... probably sell it straight out the back door to the spooks.

Either they think BTC is overvalued by a factor of four and are cashing out. I have accounts at circle.com and CB and I much prefer Circle. I get my money and coins faster. Also, that CB pump and dump when they rolled out their exchange was totally unprofessional.



2566. Post 12199212 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 21, 2015, 03:43:44 AM

Their data-mining revenue per scalp must have increased, or been assessed more 'valuable' Smiley

For every user they stick their probe up "for their own protection" (AML/KYC) they harvest an incredible amount of information that is like gold to the data vultures ... probably sell it straight out the back door to the spooks.

Either they think BTC is overvalued by a factor of four and are cashing out. I have accounts at circle.com and CB and I much prefer Circle. I get my money and coins faster. Also, that CB pump and dump when they rolled out their exchange was totally unprofessional.

They are just trying to attract more customers while at the same time rewarding customers they already have in order to gain loyalty. They expect to gain more in fees than they do giving out free bonuses in the long run. This also attracts more people to Bitcoin in general and helps motivate people to spread the word which also helps CB. Not everything is a scam people. This is just marketing. I'm amazed at the lack of understanding of this and how you people read into this in such twisted ways.

It's not a lack of understanding, rather you are being naive. Hey, when you've been screwed by the gubmints and corporations every way since sunday and sold down the river for your personal financial intel ... well, yes "everything is a damn scam people". A little cynicism is healthy after all, these guys are in it for profit and gubmint wants to control your life, no conspiracy necessary. If your product satisfies a need you hardly need the 'marketing' BS layer.

I think you could just pay your friends  a hundred and twenty five bucks to set up an account, buy a hundred dollars worth of BTC, and transfer it to you. They'd have $25.  You'd have $75 and $100 worth of BTC.

Hell, I might do that if I have time.



2567. Post 12199524 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: ArticMine on August 21, 2015, 04:53:56 AM
If Bitcoin survives this it will come out way stronger, there is however also a significant chance that block size issue will turn Bitcoin into a failed experiment.    

quoted from ArticMine, 2013.

Thanks for the quote. All I can say is that I just finished selling the bulk of my remaining Bitcoins for a mix of 80% CAD (Canadian Dollars) and 20% XMR (Monero)

thanks for playing. One less weak hand.



2568. Post 12201762 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: Andre# on August 21, 2015, 10:16:00 AM
This makes everything clear.

"Permanently keeping the 1MB (anti-spam) restriction is a great idea ..."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946236.0

this is excellent.

What many don't seem to grok is that the BIP process effectively guarantees the 1 MB hard limit because any small group of core devs or even a single coder gets basically veto power over any improvements he doesn't like as much as his own. Stalemate. It's like the council of Captains in Pirates of the Caribbean voting for themselves as Pirate King.  Then Jack Hearn Sparrow plays kingmaker by voting for Elizabeth Gavin Swan. Or vice versa. This metaphor is getting convoluted.

BitcoinXT is the best tool we have to break the gridlock. Even if it never comes close to achieving supermajority, if it lights a fire under the core dev's collective ass to come up with a viable alternative that scales, then that would be even better.

A bitcoin that is no longer directly accessible to the end user is no longer Bitcoin. Something else will replace it. Network effects didn't save Myspace.

Scale or die.



2569. Post 12202181 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

This is a special breed of stupidity:

Quote
Bitcoin block rewards will eventually become infinitesimal, at that point transaction fees will be the only rewards miners get. Right now transaction fees are around 0.1-0.5 BTC per block, which is nowhere near enough funding to secure the network by itself. We need transaction fees to go up, and the only thing that will force them up is the blocksize limit. Increasing block size might cause fundamental damage to Bitcoin due to this.


Larger blocks with more transactions will have more transaction fees. PLUS the fees become more valuable as  bitcoin increases in price, even if the percentage of the transaction the fee represents gets smaller and smaller. This is because  as bitcoin becomes a more viable alternative to ACH, SWIFT, Western Union, Moneygram, remittances, wire xfers, etc, many more people will keep a small stash of BTC as a hedge against fiat onramp blockage.

Miners do not have to include microtransactions in their blocks, but some do. So large transactions with fees are on average faster. There is a market for speed by design.

Chainbloat is the price we pay for disruptive competitive advantage over legacy systems. It makes us incrementally more vulnerable to some malicious attacks and much LESS vulnerable to others like transaction backlogs. It's a cost of doing business and a ridiculously low one compared to legacy networks' cost of doing business. Successful miners aren't the ones obstructing progress here. It's the inefficient miners and those attempting to subsidize their inefficiency who are.

scale or die.



2570. Post 12202248 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote


You cannot use something as a store of value if it is not in fact valuable. If you could I would use my poo as a store of value and be a rich man.

anyone who doesn't see the value of real estate on oldest longest most secure blockchain ledger can talk to my boss who bought worthless Louisiana swampland, developed a fraction of it and is now worth millions.



2571. Post 12202312 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: dreamspark on August 21, 2015, 12:52:37 PM
where are the finex walls?

They got eaten. Completely.

Didnt you get the memo?

BFX's liquidity provider just went fuck this shit and pulled all the liquidity right before the big sell off.

There's only one or two big liquidity providers left on BFX, they all moved on after BFX exposed that they were paying 0 trading fees.

Everyone's on OKC now. Don't be surprised if BFX becomes just another stamp like fiat gateway.

If they pulled out, others will move in to out bid me. Or I make bank.
Traders love volatility. Investors don't. I'm both. I ain't worried either way.




2572. Post 12202522 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: BitChick on August 21, 2015, 01:16:05 PM
Saw an article this morning.  http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/the-blackmail-of-ashley-madison-users-has-already-begun/ar-BBlXLTH?li=AA54ur I guess a extortionist group called "Team GrayFlay" is already threatening to blackmail Ashley Madison users in the hack and they want payment only in Bitcoin.  From the article
Quote
Unfortunately your data was leaked in the recent hacking of Ashley Madison and I now have your information. If you would like to prevent me from finding and sharing this information with your significant other send exactly 2.00000054 bitcoins (approx. value $450 USD) to the following address…
Quote
If Team GrayFlay (or any other blackmailer, for that matter) emailed all 32 million account holders, and just 0.01% of them agreed to pay up the $450 (£288) ransom, it would still earn them $1.4 million dollars (£0.9 million).

So I guess this is bullish news?  Not sure how I feel about making a profit on the heels of extortion though.   Undecided

I don't understand why blackmail is wrong. If you expose wrongdoing, your'e a hero. If You don't, you are a privacy advocate. If you threaten to be a hero, but get paid to be an advocate instead, you're an...extortionist?


So taking money from wrongdoers is bad even if they give it willingly? it's win-win. The "victims" wouldn't pay if the benefits didn't out weigh the costs to them. If the blackmailer doesn't get paid off, he jest does what is perfectly legal and moral for him to do in the first place: blow the whistle. What gives?



2573. Post 12202752 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: dreamspark on August 21, 2015, 01:38:47 PM
where are the finex walls?

They got eaten. Completely.

Didnt you get the memo?

BFX's liquidity provider just went fuck this shit and pulled all the liquidity right before the big sell off.

There's only one or two big liquidity providers left on BFX, they all moved on after BFX exposed that they were paying 0 trading fees.

Everyone's on OKC now. Don't be surprised if BFX becomes just another stamp like fiat gateway.

If they pulled out, others will move in to out bid me. Or I make bank.
Traders love volatility. Investors don't. I'm both. I ain't worried either way.



You're not a liquidity provider in the sense that I'm talking about, yes traders provide liquidity but exchanges have deals with certain parties to provide serious liquidity on their platforms.  

It's way more complicated than just traders will step in to provide liquidity. Just look at the effect of closing $5mill in longs when Mr MM pulled his liquidity.

You do know BFX had to halt margin calls even though they reached liquidation price due to the lack of liquidity on the bid side and how much the cascading calls would move the market. Trust me I've had multiple conversations with Phil about it.

If they had let the margin calls and sells carry on organically BFX would have eaten the whole of its book during that crash.

"If they pulled out, others will move in to out bid me"

They pulled out, have you seen the order books, $2.6 million moves the market down 50%.

I know several whales who moved long ago when this 0 fee fiasco happened, nearly all the big traders are on OKC.

Those books don't show my hidden lowball orders and I suspect many more on top of mine.

I'm HAPPY those longs were closed. They put a ceiling on price.  every margin long has to close before profits are taken.  I closed a bunch myself when I trippled down AFTER the bottom, got my average buy-in price below spot on the bounce, closed and used the profits to buy MOAR BTC.  


edit: and screw those guys. Why should they get zero fees when I have to pay?



2574. Post 12202941 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: solidcloud on August 21, 2015, 01:37:22 PM

blah blah blah..


exposing wrong doing doesn't make you a hero, Bradley, Edward and Julian. right?

Adultery is betrayal of trust and breech of marital contract--whatever your views on promiscuity--right? So it's bad, right?

If blackmail was legal, there'd be less adultery, right?

Nobody is using violence or threatening to initiate force, right?

So why is blackmail wrong?  

Telling some guy his wife is a slut is not a crime, so why is threatening to do so a crime? Particularly if it's true???

There is no logic to this. Doing something good like donating a kidney is good, but selling kidneys is evil. What the fuck? Getting paid to do something that is arguably good but certainly legal somehow become a crime when you get paid to do it?



Quote

Getting paid to keep your mouth shut does not make you a privacy advocate.
Does this help?


Then explain the legal status of Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning, and Julian Assange.



2575. Post 12203299 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: solidcloud on August 21, 2015, 02:28:51 PM


If the choice is between (living out my days in blissful ignorance) & (learning ugly truth & turning into a bitter wretch), I'll pick ignorance. There is no intrinsic value in truth, especially when it's not life-affirming.

That's your choice. I don't see what's so life-affirming about being a sucker with an unsatisfied spouse.

Quote
My point stands tho: telling a guy that his wife sucks D at a truck stop doesn't make you a hero.  You may disagree.


It might if it leads the guy either become a better husband or free of a deceitful woman.

Can we at least agree that it doesn't make you a criminal?




2576. Post 12203324 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: thefunkybits on August 21, 2015, 02:55:07 PM
First time since the flashcrash that i've seen the Bitstamp orderbook stacked higher on the bid side  Grin

haven't you heard? The Four Punch Raiders-excuse me-"liquidity providers" are on OKC now.



2577. Post 12203368 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on August 21, 2015, 02:25:28 PM


It's bullshit news that if you are cheering on you spouse and you want to keep up the moral facade it's can be bought with Bitcoin. For everything else there's Master Card.

Apparently  keeping up the moral facade is "life affirming".  Roll Eyes



2578. Post 12203426 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: thefunkybits on August 21, 2015, 03:04:51 PM
First time since the flashcrash that i've seen the Bitstamp orderbook stacked higher on the bid side  Grin

haven't you heard? The Four Punch Raiders-excuse me-"liquidity providers" are on OKC now.

you have any good reading material pertaining to that?

is that supposed to be bullish?

read up a few posts.

It's bullish if you think pump-and dumps are bullish. They always target the margin bears after squeezing the leveraged bulls.  We're not going anywhere sustainably until this block size crap is resolved.



2579. Post 12203546 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: solidcloud on August 21, 2015, 03:13:55 PM


After [presumably] learning that your ex was a cheating piece of shit, you became a better husband?
A better husband to whom, may I ask, to your cheating ex?  
Did she ...deserve a better husband?

Doesn't matter. If you love someone, you give them what they need, not what they deserve. If you love yourself, you become the person who has the option to trade up.



Quote
Farting at the opera doesn't make you a criminal either.  Just unpleasant.
Can we agree that not everyone who is !criminal = hero?

Sure. But are some criminals also heroes? (this is where people who criminally exposed wrongdoing like Snowden, Manning and Assange factor in).



2580. Post 12203893 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: solidcloud on August 21, 2015, 03:44:32 PM
 If you love someone, you give them what *you want them to want*--yourself.  Your ex, clearly, needed someone else's D, and to deceive you.  You, apparently, did not love her, since you did not want to give her what she needed.

Needy people are generally unattractive, whether men or woman. Don't be needy. That's all I'm going to say about that.



Quote

Farting at the opera doesn't make you a criminal either.  Just unpleasant.
Can we agree that not everyone who is !criminal = hero?

Quote
Sure. But are some criminals are also heroes (this is where people who criminally exposed wrongdoing like Snowden, Manning and Assange factor in).

Of course.  Though I'm not entirely sure the folks you chose as examples.

Batman and Robin Hood then. Whatever. The point is there is no logical reason why blackmail should be illegal, regardless of how unpleasant it is. There is a utilitarian case to be made that it does more good than harm. From the natural rights perspective, it doesn't violate any.  

Good people are not always pleasant and pleasant people are not always good. Laws are not always good and criminals are not always bad.



2581. Post 12204040 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Re: Ashley Madison blackmail:

Bitcoin is money that functions on an information network. The two most obvious applications are paying for information and paying to keep information secret.  There are good and bad actors who do both. It's morality neutral.  

Now, this is the Wall Observer thread, so what is the effect on price? bad publicity is still publicity, but let's call that negative anyway. There will be short term demand as adulterers buy the ransoms, but the blackmailers may cash out at the other end. No or negligible effect either way.

The biggest fundamental concern is the unresolved scalability issue. The biggest fundamental cause for optimism is currency carnage in the EM related to an impending global crash or at least downturn and looming or expanding capital controls.

It's maddening that the core devs haven't fixed the transaction capacity now when the world has a growing need for both better payment systems and stores of value.  



2582. Post 12204122 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: dreamspark on August 21, 2015, 04:17:54 PM


Those books don't show my hidden lowball orders and I suspect many more on top of mine.

I'm HAPPY those longs were closed. They put a ceiling on price.  every margin long has to close before profits are taken.  I closed a bunch myself when I trippled down AFTER the bottom, got my average buy-in price below spot on the bounce, closed and used the profits to buy MOAR BTC.  


edit: and screw those guys. Why should they get zero fees when I have to pay?

Those books also don't show the shit storm of btc that would be sold into those hidden orders as well.

Yeah and there's still 100k btc at CURRENT prices of longs open, that's still a hilariously large ceiling on the price if you ask me  Cheesy

Because they make markets, have you tried to trade on an illiquid exchange, without market makers and liquidity providers most the exchanges would be hardly more liquid than some shit coin markets, spreads would be massive and us traders couldn't make money, its how this shit works.



so if you were a whale waiting for the last year or two to buy low with minimal slippage, which exchange would you use right now?  If you were looking to take coins from longs getting squeezed, which exchange would you use? The one with the lowest fees or the one with the most vulnerable people on the opposite side of the trade?  I'm a bull.I go where the sellers are or are going to be.



2583. Post 12204448 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on August 21, 2015, 04:39:40 PM

The Extortionist

This person as illegally acquired sensitive information which is of no obvious significance for the Public Sphere but could be devastating in individual cases. This person is actively threatening to cause harm unless it is paid a ransom. This person is a criminal, whatever way you look at it. Any pretense of a moral high ground simply adds insult to injury.



Bullshit. The blackmailers in this case are not the same as the hackers who leaked.  They did not illegally obtain the information and they are leaving it to the users  of the site to decide if more harm than good is caused by exposing their activities to their spouses or if it is worth paying the ransom. People in open relationships would never pay the ransom anyway so you are bringing up something completely irrelevant.

Punishing bad behavior is only good if the State does it? Only when the state punishes bad behavior does it result in less bad behavior? What makes government sanction so magically delicious?

There would be no blackmail if people did not do things they would be ashamed to admit. If punishing bad behavior leads to less bad behavior then it is a net benefit to society regardless of who does the punishing. Cops get paid to investigate and bring ugly truths to light, so what is it about a badge that makes the same action bad for a private citizen?




2584. Post 12205230 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: solidcloud on August 21, 2015, 04:44:25 PM

Robin Hood is a better fit, tho seen from a Libertarian perspective, strictly a criminal.  He took it upon himself to redistribute the wealth from the deserving rich to the lazy poor, like that commie socialist Obama.


Bullshit. Robin Hood returned the wealth that the State had stolen from the poor.



The point is there is no logical reason why blackmail should be illegal, regardless of how unpleasant it is. There is a utilitarian case to be made that it does more good than harm. From the natural rights perspective, it doesn't violate any.  
Quote

Not sure what you mean by "natural rights," right to privacy, right to bear arms, that sort of thing?  Society makes laws based on its mores, and society finds blackmail morally objectionable.  As our mores morph, laws follow.  Sodomy used to be illegal, marrying your 13-yr.-old cousin was a-ok.  Now that's changed.
Judicial  law makes no claim to being eternal and immutable, like God's law, or laws of physics.  It's just a bunch of formal rules.

As far as utility value of an act, utility to whom?  Gassing Jews and faggots may have had great utility value, as most murders do (to those committing them).  As most crime does.  Not sue how utility of an act plays into all this.


Utility to whom? didn't you just say "Society makes laws based on its mores, and society finds blackmail morally objectionable.  As our mores morph, laws follow."??  

My whole argument is that Society's mores are logically inconsistent.  When a government employee or an unpaid volunteer do something that's legal and even encouraged suddenly becomes illegal and evil when done for profit.  

Mores DO change. Empires, nations and entire civilizations come and go and excessive reliance on centralized power is usually an end stage signal of decline.

Civil laws effectively force people through threat of violence to behave a certain way and you think that's fine, but when we use shame to alter behavior, that's terrible.  No wonder we have so many single mothers and broken homes. We are becoming a nation of bastards. literally.  Society will not survive if the beta males who physically built it can't even have paternity assurance as compensation for their endless toil.  Work to give half your money to the State and the other half to support a cheating wife and a kid you don't even know is yours?  

I know already what the response is: "That guy's not a victim. He's a loser"  He chose poorly. Well, he's a loser alright- but he's a loser because he thought the game was "win-win or no deal" when the game is between different groups of parasites and his blood is the prize.

I'm not gonna fight the system. I'm gonna sit back, watch it destroy itself and do my best to avoid getting dragged down with it. Let hackers hack. Let blackmailers blackmail.  Let rioters riot and let the State go to Hell. This isn't even my society anymore.



2585. Post 12205419 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: rebuilder on August 21, 2015, 06:35:44 PM
Well, this is even more off-topic than usual! Re: why blackmail is objectionable:

As a blackmailer, you're either threatening to release damaging information about someone who's done nothing wrong, or offering to let a wrongdoer off the hook in exchange for money. Neither seems exactly proper.

Someone who's done nothing wrong won't pay, so the threat is a waste of energy. Otherwise, the blackmailer is letting a wrong doer who's NOT on the hook stay off the hook and pay for his (or her) misdeeds in a different way that possibly causes less collateral damage.

Maybe the issue should be framed thusly: Why is blackmail considered more morally (and therefor legally) more objectionable than adultery?

Ashley Madison openly encourages adultery and gets paid to do so and it's all perfectly legal, but Bitcoin merely fails to actively prevent behavior that is considered bad for arbitrary and inconsistent reasons, and we need to be regulated out of existence.

Sorry, but you can't enforce the unenforceable and you can't permit the impermissible.  The market has been around longer than the State and will be around long after it is dead.



2586. Post 12205608 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: rebuilder on August 21, 2015, 06:52:02 PM
Someone who's done nothing wrong won't pay, so the threat is a waste of energy or letting a wrong doer who's NOT on the hook stay off the hook and pay for his (or her) misdeeds in a different way that possibly causes less collateral damage.


Oh, they'll pay if doing nothing wrong can still get you in trouble. For an extreme example, try being gay in a country where that's illegal and/or will lead to death threats if known.

If you live in a country like that and you think BLACKMAIL is the problem, then I really can't help you. That's so dumb, I can't formulate a response.

Edit: ok, I'll try. You are asking hypothetically, if you live in a society that sanctions evil behavior and punishes morally neutral behavior, is blackmail bad? right? No, it's the sanction of evil behavior (gay bashing) that is bad. without the sanction of evil, blackmail would be effective exclusively against bad behavior.

That's not the question I posed. I am contending that that is EXACTLY the society we live in with regard to adultery and blackmail.  The question is why is blackmail so evil it is outlawed while adultery is tolerated?

Why is blackmail worse than adultery?  Riddle me that. Blackmail can be used in theory to punish the innocent but usually punishes the wrongdoing, where as adultery can in theory be used to punish the wrongdoing of a spouse, but usually punishes the innocent.

A society that punishes Batman but tolerates the Joker is bizzaro world.





2587. Post 12205896 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: rebuilder on August 21, 2015, 07:38:52 PM


Oh, they'll pay if doing nothing wrong can still get you in trouble. For an extreme example, try being gay in a country where that's illegal and/or will lead to death threats if known.

If you live in a country like that and you think BLACKMAIL is the problem, then I really can't help you. That's so dumb, I can't formulate a response.


How about a country where what you do in your free time can get you kicked out of your job, because some things are considered crimes although there's no victim?

Again, that's exactly what I'm asking. In the free market, every trade is win-win or no deal. No victims. One party may benefit more than the other but they both benefit or the trade doesn't happen. There is no "victim" in backmail. Actions have consequences and offering someone a choice as to which consequences they face is a simple business proposal. I'm guessing Bill Clinton would have preferred Linda Tripp make such a proposal. 



2588. Post 12206048 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: BitChick on August 21, 2015, 06:07:08 PM


Well, thankfully husband only had us sell 25%.  (like it or not, he was right about selling.  It is never fun to tell husbands they are right though. LOL)  But we actually cannot buy much back because we have a daughter starting college in a couple weeks.  It is a private university too and we are planning on paying for it all without any loans.  We have most of the year covered but I really hope we have another bubble by the halving next Summer. 

another bubble in Bitcoin or in college tuition? I'm pretty sure you'll get one or the other.


Also, no sympathy in you eating crow. Women only have to tell their husbands they are right when they actually are. For us men, it's different.



2589. Post 12206149 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: PlumPurple on August 21, 2015, 08:08:05 PM

You are not living in a "free market" society.  In this society, every trade is not a win-win proposition, unless you consider "give me money, and I won't ruin your life" a win-win.
Blackmailers capitalize on us living in a sub-ideal world.  That's why they're repugnant.

Don't be a blackmailer.

Basic shit that should be self-evident to a three-year-old, yet has to be explained here.

Yes, please do explain. Explain how "You did something so wrong or stupid that it will ruin your life if widely known and I'll not reveal it for a mutually agreed upon price" Equates to what you said. 

Threatening to tell the truth is not a crime. It may be distasteful but free societies do not make good taste mandatory. Those who seek to impose their tastes on others by threat of force are no different from the gay bashers except in degree.

Yes, I know we don't live in a free society. That's why I brought this up. Kinda my whole point.



2590. Post 12206166 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on August 21, 2015, 08:23:19 PM


Oh, they'll pay if doing nothing wrong can still get you in trouble. For an extreme example, try being gay in a country where that's illegal and/or will lead to death threats if known.

If you live in a country like that and you think BLACKMAIL is the problem, then I really can't help you. That's so dumb, I can't formulate a response.


How about a country where what you do in your free time can get you kicked out of your job, because some things are considered crimes although there's no victim?

Again, that's exactly what I'm asking. In the free market, every trade is win-win or no deal. No victims. One party may benefit more than the other but they both benefit or the trade doesn't happen. There is no "victim" in backmail. Actions have consequences and offering someone a choice as to which consequences they face is a simple business proposal. I'm guessing Bill Clinton would have preferred Linda Tripp make such a proposal. 

I guess this would apply to robbery at gun point as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LR3uFfT-qtM

I already addressed the difference. It's not my fault if you jump in the middle and think you've made some profound point.



2591. Post 12206198 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: aztecminer on August 21, 2015, 08:25:53 PM
bizarro world = people who still think 'interest to infinity' debt slavery and 'trusting in god' for the fed to print money to pay the iou's to the banks from the money the banks paid to the us treasury for iou bonds from the money they got from loaning out 90% of what we deposit into their banks to other people 'interest to inifinity' creating new money so that all of us can slave labor to get some of the ever expanding money supply so we can pay the govy #abusivehightaxes to pay for obamacare and the dividends to the owners of the federal reserve (the banks) is still a valid working experiment.

Good point. Thanks for getting us back on track. I wish I knew which economist said something like "it's insanity to give power to those who pay no consequence for being wrong."



2592. Post 12206264 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on August 21, 2015, 08:39:33 PM
Good point. Thanks for getting us back on track. I wish I knew which economist said something like "it's insanity to give power to those who pay no consequence for being wrong."

Quote
It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.
Thomas Sowell


Thank you. He said it better than I did. That's why he gets paid to write and I don't.

Edit: Does this apply to the block size controversy? The FDA approves far less drugs than get denied approval and as a consequence far more people die from lack of appropriate medicine than are saved by protection from harmful medication, but because they only get credit for those they save and not those they kill, the FDA pays no price for being wrong. None of the core devs have been successful at getting their scalability fix implemented (so far), but they can truthfully point out all the downsides of the trade-offs of the other proposals and prevent those fixes from also being implemented.  There is a bias in the decision-making process similar to that of the FDA.  

It's impossible to measure lost opportunity, but we know how much time has been lost. Is being lost. The rate is sixty seconds a minute, 24 hours a day.



2593. Post 12214388 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Listening to these fools, arguing that bitcoin doesn't need to scale because we can use trusted third parties to work around the transaction limit.  In short it can scale as long as we don't scale it. 

People with conflicts of interest complaining that their opponents have conflicts of interest. 

so anyway. I bought a $50 gamestop gift card at purse .io for $41 worth of bitcoin, went to Gamestop and used the credit to buy a shell gift card, went to shell and bought gas and a pack of cigarettes and still have $41 dollars left on the card, so I effectively got my purchase for free!

Purse.io rocks. Bullish? not a paid endorsement



2594. Post 12215973 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: cbeast on August 23, 2015, 01:16:42 AM
 

This is no longer a problem, it it s a crisis. It it continues to be unresolved, it will eventually become an existential crisis.  We cannot afford to wait for the BIP process to play out. There is a significant chance that it won't play out and not deciding is deciding on a bottleneck in capacity that will inevitably clog the network entirely. No doubt there are some people who desire that exact outcome and they are exploiting this technological, political and ideological split.  Gox is nothing compared to this. We are approaching our darkest hour.

There are not just two camps in this war. There are the The cripplecoiners, the scaleforkers and the haterz. The haterz do not want any consensus to ever be reached. They have been around since I got here in 2011. They now see their opportunity, and I can't for the life of me see how to stop them.



2595. Post 12216153 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 23, 2015, 02:35:57 AM
Somebody is launching a shitload of XT nodes all on VPS hosting, the next step in the saga.

What makes you believe it is one person?  What makes you believe they are using VPS hosting?

Could it not be people waiting till the weekend to have the time to make the switch?
Yes it possible, I almost download XT earlier but then didn't lol. doesn't mean I would install or open port 8333. Plus you can still use both versions until XT core takes over... if I understand that part correctly.

right 2 weeks after its taken 75% of HASHING power not number of nodes

its currently at 0.3% of hashing power ( up 300% from yesterday )

it might be hard for XT to get 75% miners seem to prefer the idea that 1MB limit will soon bring in higher TX fees

TX fees are a tiny fraction of miner revenue compared to the block reward. This will likely continue to be the case for the next two halvings unless the cripplecoiners are successful in bottlenecking the network.  Then fees go up as the price of BTC plumets. Then will get a bigger slice of a smaller pie with quite possibly a net loss of revenue in fiat terms.



2596. Post 12223785 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: Wary on August 23, 2015, 10:36:47 PM
Democracy is the rule of the mob.
Bitcoin is a consensus system. Anyone trying to contaminate it with "democractic" process is proposing an attack at the heart of Bitcoin ethos.  
Imagine we have a project that requires consensus. You've invested 1M$ and I've invested 1$. Now I would be able to blackmail you, not giving you my consensus until you give me most of your M$. And in the long run nobody will invest in such a project. So if you want a project to work, you'll have to use force against me, obstructing minority, i.e. to switch from consensus to democracy.

At consensus minority blackmails majority. And those who care less win.
At democracy majority oppresses minority. And brute force wins.
The both systems are inherently bad.

The good solution is the free market.

+1 well said



2597. Post 12224020 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

I wonder how much money and time it would take to add enough XT hashing power to trigger the switch assuming no more existing nodes defected.  I'm guessing it could easily be done for less than $500M.  The problem is that the cripplecoiners would only need to add one Terahash/second for every 3 Terahashes/sec new nodes to prevent it from happening.

I'm pretty sure 21.co's chips will be mining XT. Microtransactions will not be practical once the network approaches capacity.  At capacity, they won't even be possible.

Cripplecoiners consider small transactions "spam", but microtransactions will prevent spam if, for example, email requires 0.1 milibit postage. or even 0.01 mBit. A lightning network adds a layer of complexity to a system that is already too complex for mainstream use.  Trusted third parties may make it simple and easy, but that defeats the whole purpose of a peer to peer network.



2598. Post 12224288 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: shmadz on August 24, 2015, 02:29:33 AM
I wonder how much money and time it would take to add enough XT hashing power to trigger the switch assuming no more existing nodes defected.  I'm guessing it could easily be done for less than $500M.  The problem is that the cripplecoiners would only need to add one Terahash/second for every 3 Terahashes/sec new nodes to prevent it from happening.

I'm pretty sure 21.co's chips will be mining XT. Microtransactions will not be practical once the network approaches capacity.  At capacity, they won't even be possible.

Cripplecoiners consider small transactions "spam", but microtransactions will prevent spam if, for example, email requires 0.1 milibit postage. or even 0.01 mBit. A lightning network adds a layer of complexity to a system that is already too complex for mainstream use.  Trusted third parties may make it simple and easy, but that defeats the whole purpose of a peer to peer network.

Did you make some bad bets Mr decentral banker? You seem awfully bitter as of late.

Well, a small profit in BTC terms. I immediately reinvested my profits from the flash crash back into BTC. Obviously my stash in dollar terms is down. No, I'm bitter because I know this scaling controversy will drag on for months. Markets hate uncertainty.

Having said that, I know BFX isn't going to crash to double digits. If it didn't during the flash crash with far more dollar swaps and fewer BTC swaps, it won't crash now. It may go down and probably will, but there are too many people living in countries with crashing fiat and BTC onramps now. All I have to do is stay solvent and wait.  BTC is crippled, but in the land of the lepers, the man with the most toes is king.



2599. Post 12224375 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 24, 2015, 03:19:39 AM
I wonder how much money and time it would take to add enough XT hashing power to trigger the switch assuming no more existing nodes defected.  I'm guessing it could easily be done for less than $500M.  The problem is that the cripplecoiners would only need to add one Terahash/second for every 3 Terahashes/sec new nodes to prevent it from happening.

I'm pretty sure 21.co's chips will be mining XT. Microtransactions will not be practical once the network approaches capacity.  At capacity, they won't even be possible.

Cripplecoiners consider small transactions "spam", but microtransactions will prevent spam if, for example, email requires 0.1 milibit postage. or even 0.01 mBit. A lightning network adds a layer of complexity to a system that is already too complex for mainstream use.  Trusted third parties may make it simple and easy, but that defeats the whole purpose of a peer to peer network.

i think you should try squeezing in more "cripplecoiners" slurs into your rants to be more believable ... or it's simply a rant and ineffective

I call our side "scaleforkers", because I try to be an equal opportunity offender. Anyhowz, if the slur fits...

There's no reason for there to be any block size limit for the same reason there is no reason to fear selfish miners witholding blocks to get a head start on the next one. If your block is too big, someone else's block will propagate faster and you'll miss out on the block reward.

You gotta decide if you want a small slice of a big pie or a huge slice of a tiny one.  intentionally throttling the network to collect more fees is like strangling the golden goose to get more eggs.



2600. Post 12224513 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on August 24, 2015, 03:50:41 AM
I wonder how much money and time it would take to add enough XT hashing power to trigger the switch assuming no more existing nodes defected.  I'm guessing it could easily be done for less than $500M.  The problem is that the cripplecoiners would only need to add one Terahash/second for every 3 Terahashes/sec new nodes to prevent it from happening.

I'm pretty sure 21.co's chips will be mining XT. Microtransactions will not be practical once the network approaches capacity.  At capacity, they won't even be possible.

Cripplecoiners consider small transactions "spam", but microtransactions will prevent spam if, for example, email requires 0.1 milibit postage. or even 0.01 mBit. A lightning network adds a layer of complexity to a system that is already too complex for mainstream use.  Trusted third parties may make it simple and easy, but that defeats the whole purpose of a peer to peer network.

i think you should try squeezing in more "cripplecoiners" slurs into your rants to be more believable ... or it's simply a rant and ineffective

I call our side "scaleforkers", because I try to be an equal opportunity offender. Anyhowz, if the slur fits...

There's no reason for there to be any block size limit for the same reason there is no reason to fear selfish miners witholding blocks to get a head start on the next one. If your block is too big, someone else's block will propagate faster and you'll miss out on the block reward.

You gotta decide if you want a small slice of a big pie or a huge slice of a tiny one.  intentionally throttling the network to collect more fees is like strangling the golden goose to get more eggs.

Or like jumping out of a certain wooden sculpture when the walls of Troy first come into view?

Not sure if you're being sarcastic. If you don't like XT, then give us an alternative that scales. I'm not in love with Gavin and Hearn, but they are the only devs apparently committed to making Bitcoin scale. The Trojan Horse metaphor could equally apply to core devs centralizing control in the name of decentralization. Without at least the threat of a hard fork, there is no incentive for them to listen to users like me.



2601. Post 12224630 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: TerraMaster on August 24, 2015, 04:20:22 AM
1900 bitcoin bought in the last hour per fiatleak so this is something to be happy about. Now, we press forward.
Monday is coming now, it should be an interesting week with all the stock market woes and so on. I still believe BTC is as good or better an investment, as in any other time, despite the core vs. XT debate.  Smiley

Playing the stock market amounts to guessing which way the Fed will go and when: print or raise rates. The fact that the current BTC market amounts to guessing which way Core will go and when should tell you that they already have too much power.



2602. Post 12224672 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: shmadz on August 24, 2015, 04:39:10 AM
  intentionally throttling the network to collect more fees is like strangling the golden goose to get more eggs.

Or like jumping out of a certain wooden sculpture when the walls of Troy first come into view?

Our like trying to charge money for an infinite resource?

Bip 101 timescale:

Year.  Size.  Reward.  blockchain size (rough estimate)
2016  8MB.  12.5.     40GB
2020  32MB  6.25.     3.4TB
2024. 128MB  3.125.  16.8TB
2028. 512MB  1.5625.  70.56TB
2032  2048MB  0.78125.  285.6TB
2036  8192MB  0.390625.  1145TB

How many individuals do you think will be incentivized to store more than a petabyte of data with no compensation? The good news is that Gavin's plan is preposterous and will never gain traction, so fortunately there's nothing to worry about.  Cool

2036 is in 21 years. How big was a hard drive 21 years ago?  (hint: a tiny fraction of the storage on my current 3 year old phone).  Storage is so cheap now that if you include cloud storage like dropbox, it's free.
This is the same fallacy the Malthusians made about mass starvation with population doubling every forty years.  Didn't happen. All famines today are political, including ours.



2603. Post 12224859 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: HerrAndreas on August 24, 2015, 05:10:19 AM


Ever wondered why unsuccessful people (or movements) always blame others for their failure, but successful ones never?

Dont get me wrong, but if you are oposing an existing system, please be prepared for equally sized oposition.

If you dont make it, it will have been your own fault.


As much as I would like to blame the banksters for this mess, there is too much evidence that it's actually a reaction to 21's embedded chip business model by the soon-to-be-obsolete ASIC miners. Never ascribe to conspiracy that which can be equally explained by incompetence.  Old miners think making microtransactions impractical will save them when the opposite is true. Microtransactions will be the onramp for the third world and the great majority of the unbanked. 

In England, land prices skyrocketed when the great estates were broken up and the peasants were finally allowed to own land.  You would think the people selling the land would be happy about that, but the great lords thought it was the end of the world.  The more things  change, the more they stay the same.



2604. Post 12225014 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

It looks like some kind of circuit breaker tripped on bfx. no trades for a while.



2605. Post 12225124 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on August 24, 2015, 06:35:43 AM
It looks like some kind of circuit breaker tripped on bfx. no trades for a while.
I can't even cancel my orders...

came back online, someone dumped 1K coins and went off again. This is not good.



2606. Post 12225328 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 24, 2015, 07:12:47 AM
It looks like some kind of circuit breaker tripped on bfx. no trades for a while.
I can't even cancel my orders...

came back online, someone dumped 1K coins and went off again. This is not good.

WTF, BJA?Huh?


At least if you make some kind of factual representation regarding current events, you could be a little more accurate. 

It appears that Bitfinex came back on line for about 2.5 minutes, and during that time, around 1000 BTC were traded... but they were NOT merely one player dumping coins, but instead there were a lot of trades back and forth between approximately $219 and $223.

Sorry, a thousand coins were either market sold or hit their ask price. UPDATE back up to $223



2607. Post 12233948 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

So when the price drops so low that everyone is mining at a loss, how many mines will shut down, how many will run cripplecode and how many will run XT?



2608. Post 12234429 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: dreamspark on August 25, 2015, 02:15:04 AM
So when the price drops so low that everyone is mining at a loss, how many mines will shut down, how many will run cripplecode and how many will run XT?

Forget XT, it's not going to happen. Some version of bip 100 will likely be chosen. XT is a coup to produce some action.

Production cost is still below current price.

If big enough mines start shutting down you should be far more worried about Bitcoin dying due to how long it would take to find a block than what client is currently running.

My understanding is that BIP 100 requires a miner vote for ANY blocksize increase and then it's only marginal. 

So imagine the network is bogging down and miners are raking in fees for the big transactions, do you think they will vote to increase blocksize?   If you say "yes", are you confident enough to bet your business on it? Your life savings? How is that any better than what we have now? Markets hate uncertainty. We are witnessing that.




2609. Post 12234661 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

The five properties of money are:

Recognizability
Fungibility
Portability
Scarcity
Divisibility

By limiting blocksize, cripplecoiners are limiting divisibility. It's not spam. Dust transactions add up. Ask any gold miner selling gold dust.

I buy your product, miners. If it's less divisible, then it's less valuable to me. If it is more expensive to transfer, then it's less portable also and therefor less valuable to me.

If Bitcoin doesn't scale, it will lose market share to an altcoin that does until it is eventually replaced.

Scale or die.



2610. Post 12253651 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: Richy_T on August 26, 2015, 05:22:47 PM

That's if you actually believe that Gavin & Mike are not government agents trying to break Bitcoin which a good case can be made for..

It seems more likely the government agents are on the other side if anything

http://pastebin.com/4BcycXUu

"> Just so you know this stuff about Tor has me worried... Please don't make this
> public, but my day job involves intelligence, and I'm in a relatively high
> position. You know, I went into the job years ago with very different thoughts
> about it than I do now. The last, well, decade really has changed a lot of
> minds in this field, in totally different ways. Myself I am on the side of
> Snowden and Assange, but... lets just say when you have a family your
> willingness to be a martyr diminishes."

Holy shit. CRIPPLECOINERS ARE INFILTRATED BY GOV'T INTELLIGENCE

That explains why they are opposed to ANY method that can practically scale the network. Not just XT. Not just block size. anything. I've been a die hard supporter of bitcoin since 2011, but I'm not going to dump another penny into supporting this project if these assholes get their way.



2611. Post 12262658 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Can't you see what these assholes are doing? They want to scare everyone off of BFX because those $25 M in margin longs will all have to close at some point. BY opposing block size increase, they are keeping almost any new investment from VCs because a Bitcoin that doesn't scale is a bitcoin that can't disrupt. So when the market slumps, it will flash-crash on BFX and they will be the only ones on BFX scooping up BTC for pennies on the dollar. 

BFX has problems but so do all other exchanges.

both bulls and bears are taking down leverage. We're seeing a slump because miners don't run the show. The market does and the market ain't buying your shitty BIP100.



2612. Post 12266758 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: aztecminer on August 28, 2015, 11:33:58 AM
Can't you see what these assholes are doing? They want to scare everyone off of BFX because those $25 M in margin longs will all have to close at some point. BY opposing block size increase, they are keeping almost any new investment from VCs because a Bitcoin that doesn't scale is a bitcoin that can't disrupt. So when the market slumps, it will flash-crash on BFX and they will be the only ones on BFX scooping up BTC for pennies on the dollar.  

BFX has problems but so do all other exchanges.

both bulls and bears are taking down leverage. We're seeing a slump because miners don't run the show. The market does and the market ain't buying your shitty BIP100.



not being able to withdraw is a serious problem imo. if didn't have technical problems then wouldnt have technical glitches that cause trading and withdrawals to stop. this is why bitfinex is working very hard to fix all their technical problems. it's like if your bitcoins are secure then they cant be hacked and stolen. it will be pointless to scoop up cheap coins if you cannot withdraw them. i think your theory is bunk . it not like "those assholes" are stopping trading and withdrawals on BFX in some kind of scheme. those problems seem extreme. that is why people are closing their longs and shorts leaving BFX.

Not being able to withdraw is a huge problem, but this we've been told is due to data corruption and a changing of their bank.  There is no indication (yet) that this is a Gox-like solvency issue.  It's a reason for concern, not a reason to panic.

Nobody should be keeping the majority of their bitcoins an ANY exchange. If you don't control the private keys, you don't own bitcoin (just bitcoin I.O.U.s).



2613. Post 12266806 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: bad trader on August 28, 2015, 03:05:19 PM
It looks more and more like the manipulator may want to push this up from here.

You don't need to think this is a single market maker to see it is just a low volume melt-up. 



2614. Post 12266960 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 28, 2015, 03:43:52 PM
http://worldbitcoinnetwork.com/BitcoinPriceModel-Alpha.html



is bitcoin undervalued at 226???

DUH!

Adam, how the hell are we gonna take over 25% of global remittances and 9% of e-commerce at 7 transactions per second?



2615. Post 12267049 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 28, 2015, 04:00:33 PM


Adam, how the hell are we gonna take over 25% of global remittances at 7 transactions per second?

BIP100 then BIP200 and then...

or maybe sidechains will help wtv man 25% of global remittances  is baked in the cake 32,000$ is coming.



Baked in? When and if the code the majority of the network runs is scalable, THEN I'll believe bitcoin is undervalued. 

BIP100 is the LEAST scalable of proposed upgrades and even it is a looooong way from implementation.



2616. Post 12267147 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: aztecminer on August 28, 2015, 04:07:54 PM
Can't you see what these assholes are doing? They want to scare everyone off of BFX because those $25 M in margin longs will all have to close at some point. BY opposing block size increase, they are keeping almost any new investment from VCs because a Bitcoin that doesn't scale is a bitcoin that can't disrupt. So when the market slumps, it will flash-crash on BFX and they will be the only ones on BFX scooping up BTC for pennies on the dollar.  

BFX has problems but so do all other exchanges.

both bulls and bears are taking down leverage. We're seeing a slump because miners don't run the show. The market does and the market ain't buying your shitty BIP100.



not being able to withdraw is a serious problem imo. if didn't have technical problems then wouldnt have technical glitches that cause trading and withdrawals to stop. this is why bitfinex is working very hard to fix all their technical problems. it's like if your bitcoins are secure then they cant be hacked and stolen. it will be pointless to scoop up cheap coins if you cannot withdraw them. i think your theory is bunk . it not like "those assholes" are stopping trading and withdrawals on BFX in some kind of scheme. those problems seem extreme. that is why people are closing their longs and shorts leaving BFX.

Not being able to withdraw is a huge problem, but this we've been told is due to data corruption and a changing of their bank.  There is no indication (yet) that this is a Gox-like solvency issue.  It's a reason for concern, not a reason to panic.

Nobody should be keeping the majority of their bitcoins an ANY exchange. If you don't control the private keys, you don't own bitcoin (just bitcoin I.O.U.s).


i would have already bailed. i'm on coinbase exchange because they are based in the usa and they have good reputation and are market leaders.. at least that is my impression of them atm.. while my impression of bitfinex is an exchange based in hong kong that has fishey stuff going on and might collapse the next time margins are called.... i'm not doing any margin trading because is too risky imo.. i already feel like it is me against the music while trading bitcoin so i am not going to give anyone even more advantages over me.... i'm sure your trader sense will let you know when to pull out of bitfinex if it is going to collapse right billyjoe ?? i do like btc-e exchange though. i don't trade on there all the time though... and bitstamp is now the ONLY bitcoin ----> ripple gateway for usa residents atm .

It wasn't trader sense that told me to get out of Gox just before the door slammed shut. It was the price differential between EmptyGox and the other exchanges.  The MARKET told me to bail. The Market is not spooked by BFX blunders (yet). The Market is spooked by incompetence of a much more profound kind: Core devs decision-making process is FUBAR.  They want centralized control to guard against centralization.  



2617. Post 12267206 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 28, 2015, 04:19:47 PM


Adam, how the hell are we gonna take over 25% of global remittances at 7 transactions per second?

BIP100 then BIP200 and then...

or maybe sidechains will help wtv man 25% of global remittances  is baked in the cake 32,000$ is coming.



Baked in? When and if the code the majority of the network runs is scalable, THEN I'll believe bitcoin is undervalued. 

BIP100 is the LEAST scalable of proposed upgrades and even it is a looooong way from implementation.

once/if it's been agreed on i can't see it take more then a week to implement...

the longer you wait for it to become clear that bitcoin will improve its scalability the higher the price will be.

buy now while poeple still believe bitcoin is about to die because of this issue  

Once/if BIP100 is implemented, miners STILL have to vote to increase blocksize and by how much.  You are taking a lot of things for granted.



2618. Post 12267359 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 28, 2015, 04:29:39 PM


miners will probably make a vote where blocklimit is always about 2X avg block size
ok ok BIP100 might suck for various reasons
the point is the debate went from
no increase Vs increase
to
BIP101 vs BIP100
its only a matter of time until somehow some way blocklimit is increased

i strongly suggest buying the rumor


No the debate went from "we don't have a scaling problem" to "We have a scaling problem that is unfixable unless everyone agrees on how to fix it". 

What if "Some how some way" means that the market has to crash before the devs come to an agreement?



2619. Post 12267513 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on August 28, 2015, 04:31:53 PM


You know, there is NO solution on the table from ANYONE that results in a Bitcoin that is both scalable AND decentralized.

To handle the transaction volume of Visa would require every block to be 10-20 GB (Yes, GB, not MB).  At that block-size, decentralization, which I consider to be a fundamental requirement of what we call Bitcoin, would be long gone.

I agree that we can increase the block size some as a stop-gap measure - but block-size increases alone will not save Bitcoin.

Hopefully, the upcoming conference will yield some fresh ideas.

Cryptomining, like any other specialized activity, benefits from economies of scale. This is unavoidable. You can minimize it, but you can't eliminate it unless you centralize some other aspect of the network, such as CODE DEVELOPMENT. 

The problem isn't technical. it's political. You have these little Napoleons who crowned themselves emperors in the name of protecting the revolution.



2620. Post 12267708 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on August 28, 2015, 05:16:04 PM


You know, there is NO solution on the table from ANYONE that results in a Bitcoin that is both scalable AND decentralized.

To handle the transaction volume of Visa would require every block to be 10-20 GB (Yes, GB, not MB).  At that block-size, decentralization, which I consider to be a fundamental requirement of what we call Bitcoin, would be long gone.

I agree that we can increase the block size some as a stop-gap measure - but block-size increases alone will not save Bitcoin.

Hopefully, the upcoming conference will yield some fresh ideas.

Cryptomining, like any other specialized activity, benefits from economies of scale. This is unavoidable. You can minimize it, but you can't eliminate it unless you centralize some other aspect of the network, such as CODE DEVELOPMENT. 

The problem isn't technical. it's political. You have these little Napoleons who crowned themselves emperors in the name of protecting the revolution.

A centralized Bitcoin will be just as dead as a slow Bitcoin.  It very much IS a technical problem.

My point is that it is already centralized. A big reason why we are still trading in the $200s is because it is centralized. The cost of putting mining decentralization ahead of scaling and capacity is that we have concentrated power in the hands of Core devs who make money routing around the very bottlenecks they created.



2621. Post 12269749 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 28, 2015, 08:27:40 PM
all this time we were worried about central control systems from outside but it turns out they are like cancer they grow from within.  

And they thrive because the organism fails to recognize tumors as malignant, and even feeds them more than the sane organs.


I am in agreement with Stolfi? This isn't the end of Bitcoin. It's the end of the world!  Shocked

1. Seriously, the core dev's involvement with Blockstream is a real conflict of interest. Sidechains can be used as a way to route around a bottleneck. They will profit from bottlenecks that they created in the first place.

2. There is something wrong with a protocol if there is no diversity of code running on top of it, or that can run on top of it.

3. It's silly to argue about the trade-offs in scalability vs mining decentralization when code development is so centralized that it is essentially a monopoly.








2622. Post 12269861 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 28, 2015, 08:00:19 PM


i foresee a future where bitcoin is the world reserve currency and governments secure the blockchain

expecting bitcoin to grow and always allow full nodes to run off of a 500$ computer is a silly fantasy.


I foresee a world where central governments are forced to either include crypto as part of their central bank reserves or get out of the counterfeiting business altogether, but that's a long way off and there is no guarantee Bitcoin will be the crypto that prevails.

I haven't seen the cost of running a node go up at all as we approach the 1 MB limit. Hard drive storage is cheaper, bandwidth is cheaper, fast processors are cheaper. All this more than offsets the increased size of the chain. Can anyone out there give an argument otherwise?  Maybe I'm wrong.






2623. Post 12270104 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on August 28, 2015, 11:15:21 PM


1)  I don't think see any way this can be avoided.  The top Bitcoin developers will always be in demand by the top Bitcoin-related companies, and developers are free to work for anyone they want.  I don't think it's really a problem in the long run.  If people really believe that the Bitcoin Core project is compromised by developer self-interest, someone will start a BitcoinXT-like project, and Core will no longer define what IS Bitcoin.

I would caution that you shouldn't assume out-of-hand that developers are acting purely in their own interest, like Dr. Stolfi does.  Isn't it possible that the Core devs who are also Bitstream devs have thought a lot longer and harder about this problem than most of us, and realized (like I said earlier) that there really IS no way (as of now) to have Bitcoin be both scalable AND decentralized, and set about building a project that might insure that Bitcoin will still be usable anyway?  Sure they MIGHT be acting solely (or even partly) in their own interest.  But making money out of having the foresight to anticipate this problem does not, a priori, mean that their solution is not the RIGHT solution.

They don't have to be evil people to be biased in their judgement. 


Quote
2) I can't parse this.  If you think a protocol must have multiple, conflicting versions of itself, you may not understand what the word 'protocol' means.  If you mean something related to alt coins, I would point out that there are plenty of those already.

To compare:  we have firefox, chrome and IE browsers on the HTTP. We have~15% of nodes running XT, a few running old obsolete versions of core and everyone else running core. That's a monopoly when a supermajority (or even a super-duper majority "consensus" need to implement a change.  The biased core devs and greedy miners have veto power.

Scaling is a trade-off but a necessary one because we are reaching capacity.  Let's use a gold mining analogy: In the free market, there would be no way a placer miner (guy with a shovel and a pan) could consistently compete against a large mining corporation. If you change the mining rules to make him more competitive, you have left the free market.If you change the rules to make him LESS competitive, you have also left the free market, but that is not what's at issue today.  It's called "capitalism" because you need capital in order to increase your productivity.

Code development is not constrained by capital (very much) because the limiting component is creativity. There is nothing magical about being a core dev.  It does not automatically make you wise and just. 

The market will ultimately decide and if bitcoin doesn't scale, it may well decide on an altcoin.






2624. Post 12270384 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: bambou on August 29, 2015, 12:30:24 AM
Why does people keep on yapping that Blockstream does not want bigger blocks? Its is a fundamental for their project to catch on.

ALL core devs, including gavin, big VCed corporations like Jgarzik's Bitpay, large private mining ops a la Bitfury etc, they all want bigger blocks to make Bitcoin THEIR little centralized toy and exclude "small" miners/nodes/people.

Ya'll been mindfucked. This is hilarious.

Nobody wants to buy coins that are only spendable on a crippled network.  I don't buy BTC to sell later for a higher price. I buy them so that I will be able to SPEND them in the future.  If the network doesn't scale up, I won't buy them at all. 

Small mining is dead, Jack. Until 21's embedded miners come out, in which case you'll be even more screwed.   Economy of Scale is an economic law and not some preference that you can overcome without introducing other problems that are even worse.



2625. Post 12270998 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on August 29, 2015, 03:24:00 AM
XT as a threat, a manifestation of the frustration with perceived/real intransigence on the maxblocksize question from core devs, has done what it was intended to do... 1MB crowd got rekt, along with 20MB dreamers, and a compromise appears to be cresting the horizon. Jeff Garzik was right all along, sad it took a bunch of drama to get here. It was also a demonstration that the choice lies with the miners, which it absolutely does.

It's not over and the choice doesn't lay with the miners. It lays with the market, with the people who decide to invest in this project or not. Nobody is going to dump a billion dollars into bitcoin currency and infrastructure knowing they can be held hostage by miners at any time.  BIP100 does not do enough to allay those fears.

Miners need to be fucking broken to get it into their fat heads that we don't want to buy cripplecoins. I'm selling any pump and not buying back until they grok the situation.

You don't like mining without fees? Try mining $100 coins.  Who run Bartertown? I run Bartertown.



2626. Post 12271089 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on August 29, 2015, 04:07:24 AM


You and the 13% of nodes that XT topped out at? Time to make a compromise, or sell, I'm pretty sure the market can stand your frustration dumpage. The argument and subsequent arrival of XT showed the core devs they don't live in a vacuum, and you should be happy about it.

You think XT has topped out already? What happens when the group hug in Canada produces no results as they explicitly said there won't be proposals even discussed much less decided on. How many XT nodes then? Then What if Honk Kong produces no results? You still think XT will have topped out at 13%? 

8MB IS the compromise. I already explained why we don't need a software limit at all because miners are already incentivized to keep blocks small enough to propagate.  I also do not accept that a one time increase helps in the long term.  Markets do not like uncertainty. 

How many nodes will be running XT when we hit the 7tx/sec limit? What about a day after that? As I've said all along, if you don't like XT, fine. Give us something that scales or I will find a better cryptocoin to invest in.



2627. Post 12271143 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: aztecminer on August 29, 2015, 04:30:08 AM
billyjoe ... XT is dead.. as soon as the gun industry finds out about the "blockchain blacklists" bitcoin problems will just be getting started. what they are programing in is the ability to sanction anyone.. individuals, companies, states .. and it will be used as a tool to intimidate gun owners.. that code is the death of bitcoin.

As I understand it, there is a switch you can use to turn off the I.P. restrictions. Regardless, as I've said before, I'm not married to XT or G & H. I'm committed to scaling the network. 

No scale? No sale.

Scale or die.



2628. Post 12271251 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: bitcoin1992 on August 29, 2015, 04:53:26 AM
What's the general sentiment around here today? Are we going to try another attempt at 240 or are we dropping down below 220?

My guess is we're going nowhere unless some miracle happens and criplecoiners see the light or some macroeconomic disaster strikes.



2629. Post 12275658 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

How ya like this price action, cripplecoiners? Nobody wants to buy your damn unscalable shitcoins.

It's gonna get even worse. Once word gets out about the 21% vulnerability of BIP100, You're gonna see what the market thinks about miners running the show.

http://cointelegraph.com/news/115193/bip-100-support-grows-21-attack-worries-remain




2630. Post 12275809 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: gentlemand on August 29, 2015, 05:23:38 PM

I don't get why something has so suddenly enchanted so many when there's zero code to actually fap over.

It's the larger issue of stopping a miner power grab.  If the last 19 months have taught us anything, it's that the most important person in Bitcoin is the NEXT guy, they guy who hasn't bought in yet. Without him, we're all just fapping.



2631. Post 12278048 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

The miner's primary incentive to protect the network is the block reward. Fees will not eclipse the block reward as compensation UNLESS mass adoption is achieved, and that will NEVER happen if the network doesn't scale efficiently.  

How does $228 suit you assholes? Wanna try for $225? Do what I want I want or I don't buy your coins. it's pretty damn simple. It wouldn't mean shit if I was alone, but it should be getting clearer that I'm not. How clear it's gonna get depends on how long it takes you to figure out THE USERS ARE IN CONTROL, NOT THE MINERS.





2632. Post 12278440 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 29, 2015, 11:58:48 PM

Quote
[ mass adoption ] will NEVER happen if the network doesn't scale efficiently.

One must wonder whether mass adoption will ever happen.  The block size limit has not been an obstacle so far, yet adoption does not seem to be exactly exploding.  (The block size limit might be an obstacle within a year, if the traffic keeps growing at the recent rate.)


Internet adoption didn't dramatically accelerate until the World Wide Web. Bitcoin is still looking for that "killer app".  There are many potential candidates, but what will take off is probably something we haven't even thought of yet. 



2633. Post 12278606 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on August 30, 2015, 01:28:48 AM

Quote
[ mass adoption ] will NEVER happen if the network doesn't scale efficiently.

One must wonder whether mass adoption will ever happen.  The block size limit has not been an obstacle so far, yet adoption does not seem to be exactly exploding.  (The block size limit might be an obstacle within a year, if the traffic keeps growing at the recent rate.)


Internet adoption didn't dramatically accelerate until the World Wide Web. Bitcoin is still looking for that "killer app".  There are many potential candidates, but what will take off is probably something we haven't even thought of yet. 

Heh, so you're a "killer app" troll too   Roll Eyes

Consider that Bitcoin adoption is not merely about adding users but attracting capital. Bitcoin as it exists can accommodate an infinite amount of capital. There is no "scaling" problem in that regard.

Now what you are concerned with "transaction scaling" is a different set of problem. One that is often correlated to the growth of the network but any perspicacious onlooker will have noticed there is something missing from this theory.

You have misconception about Bitcoin's utility value and you need to address it before coming forward with more arguments!

I know what Bitcoin's utility value to me is, but nobody has the whole picture. What are you implying is the "real" utility value?  Yes, we absolutely need to attract new capital.  How do you think we're gonna do it?




2634. Post 12278787 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on August 30, 2015, 01:56:29 AM

By attracting capital looking for a safe, deflationary, impossible to censor or seize store of wealth.  

Stop the posturing about mainstream sheeple adoptions. The sheeps are generally poor and can only procure so much value to Bitcoin. We are still a couple years from crossing the technological chasm as Bitcoin as it stands is quite honestly not a competitive consumer product.

Fortunately there are trillions of capital who will soon be looking for that exit. Better strap your helmet and just be patient. Stop trying to "make Bitcoin better" Wink


So the new Swiss Bank Account, huh? Why not just store wealth in an active volcano? It doesn't do you any good to hide wealth if you can't retrieve it.



2635. Post 12279831 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 30, 2015, 02:51:44 AM
Strange, I saw quite a few articles about great Bitcoin adoption in Brazil. Not that that is anything great, it would be better if another country was named, instead of that shithole that's going down the drain.

Brazil currently has many big problems, but fortunately bitcoin still does not seem to be one of them.  Perhaps Brazilians are indeed smarter than the folks in your bithole.

I wonder if your opinion would change if there are bank depositor bail-ins and capital controls.   



2636. Post 12291982 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

It's bizzarre to me that anyone can claim that Bitcoin's PRIMARY utility is as a store of value. A store of value does not lose over 80% of it's market cap in less than 2 years.

Bitcoin needs to scale in order to survive. The people who sell bitcoin don't seem to think so. The people who buy Bitcoin absolutely do. Ever heard the saying "the customer is always right?"



2637. Post 12293460 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: RenegadeMan on August 31, 2015, 06:48:19 PM
It's bizzarre to me that anyone can claim that Bitcoin's PRIMARY utility is as a store of value. A store of value does not lose over 80% of it's market cap in less than 2 years.

Bitcoin needs to scale in order to survive. The people who sell bitcoin don't seem to think so. The people who buy Bitcoin absolutely do. Ever heard the saying "the customer is always right?"

I think eventually it will be seen as a store of value. Your "A store of value does not lose over 80% of it's market cap in less than 2 years" statement is taking a selective window of Bitcoin's total lifespan and highlighting its devaluation from the ATH. A similar selective view could be applied to many 'store of value' assets that went through booms and busts in their early days.

Of course it needs to scale and I don't think anyone is arguing it doesn't. You make some good points in many of your posts but I find your constant "scale or die" rhetoric to be a simplistic dumbing down of what is a relatively complex debate (you're displaying similar lines of 'intelligence' to President Bush's "You're either with us or against us" and "the axis of evil" chest beating after 911 and we all know how poorly much of that turned out).

Rather than just painting anyone that doesn't think XT has the right combination of attributes and backing as someone that's against Bitcoin moving forward, perhaps you could bring a little more clarity around the issues at hand to the discussion and dispense with such black and white judgement.

I have repeatedly said that I am not pushing specifically for XT. IF the choice is between XT and not scaling at all, then I am for it.  It frustrates me no end that those seem to be the only two options we are presented with.  Bitcoin needs to scale on an automatic timeline independent of certain people who want to choke the network and squeeze out more fees.

Without the practical ability to do microtransactions, Bitcoin's utility value is substantially lower than otherwise. BIP100 replacing a static 1MB block size limit with a dynamic 1MB block size limit is a joke, particularly when people with an incentive to bottleneck the network effectively have veto power over any increase! 

Cripplecoiners can't all be this stupid. There is some straight up evil at work here. I think of that line in Dark Knight when Alfred says "Some people just want to see the world burn."



2638. Post 12295131 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: aztecminer on September 01, 2015, 12:41:28 AM
bitcoin movement now began to slow down, perhaps waiting for a new issue.
just hope the price of bitcoin soon rise, and I can sell it at that moment  Cheesy



we are on our way up... one margin long at a time! just a few more longs and that moment will arrive and you can finally sell your "blockchain blacklist" "cripplecoin"! #victory

the ~$1 million direct investment that is required daily for BTC to have price stability doesn't yet seem to be affected by the block size controversy. But I am noticing some subtle things at the margins that may be an indicator of another leg down:

1. My orders on purse.io are not getting filled.
2. My offers on bitquick.co are not being accepted

Retail is not buying in. I don't know if the ~15,000 in margin shorts on bfx is going to be enough to stop another crash. Conversely, squeezing them won't cause much of a spike either. If miners are holding off selling all their coins in hopes of getting a higher price, then we may have a lot of overhead resistance in addition to the $23M in dollar swaps (margin longs). 

Big money may come to the rescue, but it may not. My guess is still that we're going sideways until the people who dumped at $260 run out of money to reinvest and then, unless some new development changes things, we'll retest support.

I'm really neutral in which way I want the market to go. I'm still over 90% long, but I want the cripplecoiners to get the message that coins on a throttled network are not as valuable.



2639. Post 12295563 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 01, 2015, 02:27:37 AM
I'm really neutral in which way I want the market to go. I'm still over 90% long, but I want the cripplecoiners to get the message that coins on a throttled network are not as valuable.

Retail is not buying in.

Why are you so excited about scaling transactions for retail demand that doesn't exist?



If you wanna get people interested in coin collecting, you don't start them out with Krugerrands.  You start them out with wheat pennies.  Then, I want anti-spam email, faucets to drive traffic to websites, etc.



2640. Post 12295871 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 01, 2015, 03:33:30 AM

That's the gist of your broken logic. That somehow the "mainstream" sheeps are going to drive Bitcoin success and its price.

Better get this idea out of your head because it's not happening. The average consumer will get in Bitcoin much later in the game.

No shit, Sherlock. But when the sheep get in, microtransactions will be a feature. People with vision will have to continue to build the infrastructure first, and part of that infrastructure will involve microtransactions.

You're starting to piss me off.  I've seen nothing from you to merit your arrogance. Keep it up and you go on the ignore list. Criticism is cheap. Show me some insight.

Talk about flawed logic: Retail isn't interested in Bitcoin, so we shouldn't cater to retail, which isn't interested because we don't cater to retail. Fuck you.




2641. Post 12295962 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Bitcoins are not just some tokens that we trade back and forth. They are real estate on the blockchain ledger.  We will record titles with them, time stamp creative works, etc. The ledger is what gives bitcoins value. It needs to expand because someday we may record damn near ALL titles on it and use it for almost all timestamps. 

The record of almost everything that almost everybody owns will be extremely valuable and worth maintaining, even if it takes up a lot of hard drive space.  When Seward bought Alaska from the Russians, he caught a lot of heat from people who didn't see the potential. That's what bitcoins are now, raw potential.




2642. Post 12295981 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 01, 2015, 04:42:44 AM

Bitcoin, the foundation layer, should not, ever, cater to retail.

Why not? An assertion is not an argument.



2643. Post 12296297 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: megadeth on September 01, 2015, 05:11:14 AM
This ignores the whole value of having one uniquer ledger of ownership. We don't need another coin, additional layers can serve these needs equally well.

Bitcoins are not just some tokens that we trade back and forth. They are real estate on the blockchain ledger.  We will record titles with them, time stamp creative works, etc. The ledger is what gives bitcoins value. It needs to expand because someday we may record damn near ALL titles on it and use it for almost all timestamps.  

The record of almost everything that almost everybody owns will be extremely valuable and worth maintaining, even if it takes up a lot of hard drive space.  When Seward bought Alaska from the Russians, he caught a lot of heat from people who didn't see the potential. That's what bitcoins are now, raw potential.



Forking the ledger is not a bad thing: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1161157.0.
If there is enough demand by market forces, there can be two ledgers protected by a varying percentage of hashpower.
Exchanges will help determine the value of each fork. Unfortunately people are currently split on their demands of two orthogonal use cases of Bitcoin, one of which could lead to it being more centralized.

Just to be clear, fork or no fork. Both paths will lead to immense wealth creation enabled by Bitcoin tech.

Um, no. Only one fork will survive. The losing fork will be a dead branch, a string of orphaned blocks.

I don't know which fork will prevail, but like the Highlander, there can be only one. If the cripplecoiners get their way, most of the vast potential of Bitcoin will be strangled in the crib. We will have to use a completely different cryptocoin to utilize that potential and progress will be set back years.

Cripplecoiners don't want to be Guardians of the Galaxy. They want to be bouncers at an exclusive club,



2644. Post 12305036 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: shmadz on September 02, 2015, 02:47:45 AM
Someone many pages back linked the Gavin interview, https://youtu.be/B8l11q9hsJM

Pay special attention at roughly 1:14:40 , the first and maybe only interesting question, let me paraphrase:

Brian: "so, if this fork succeeds, how will decisions be made in the future?"

Gavin: "Mike Hearn will be the benevolent dictator, he will be the ultimate decision maker."

...

He goes on to explain how he does not want to be in complete control, nor do any of the devs that currently have commit ability, but he is completely happy and ok with Mike as the sole controller and decider. He even goes in to mention that future changes will be much easier and will happen much more quickly once this change is made.

I know XT is already dead, but I just wanted to point out to anyone that was still unconvinced that Gavin has been compromised... He is either completely brain dead, or he is deliberately trying to end bitcoin's function as a permissionless, censorship-proof means of storing and transmitting value.

Hearn would only be the dictator of XT development, not the protocol. XT is only one implementation of BIP101.  Other implementations would be compatible, as XT is currently compatible with core. ANY change in the code that would make XT incompatible would orphan XT, not the other implementations. Anyone can write code using core or BIP101 components and run it on test net to see if it works and then release it into the wild.  This is open source. XT will only succeed if people use it.

A certain amount of skepticism is healthy, but I think we all need to take off our tin foil hats. We just end up talking past each other and getting nowhere.

I read the BITfury white paper in support of BIP100. There are some good points in it, but it doesn't address the big problems that are holding up infrastructure development and mainstream adoption. Entrepreneurs can't build business models around how miners may or may not vote. Issues such as node centralization are secondary.  A fully validating node is and likely will always be many orders of magnitude cheaper and easier to setup and run than a profitable mining operation.

It seems that a major concern for BIP100 supporters is that miners with slow internet connections are disadvantaged by larger blocks. Assuming for the sake of argument that this is true, why should the rest of us subsidize these slow miners? They are mostly in China which means that if they have less of a competitive advantage then mining will likely become LESS centralized with large blocks rather than more.

Miners are producers. They are essential to the network but we know what happens when producers are in control of the economy. We saw it in the Soviet Union, North Korea, East Germany, Cuba, Venezuela, and Red China. Rent-seeking behavior kills growth. In the free market, the consumer is king which is actually more fair because we are all consumers.

If we want bitcoin to survive, it has to grow. If we want it to grow, it has to scale. If we want it to scale, then we have to make some trade-offs that will benefit various people and groups differently. This is unavoidable. What is also unavoidable is technology proliferation. If we don't fix this scaling problem, banksters are going to jack our tech,  make their own coin(s), and wave at us as they leave us in the dust.

Scale or die.






2645. Post 12305217 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: shmadz on September 02, 2015, 04:02:10 AM

Scale or die.


You really are a one trick pony aren't you? Too dense to see the risks inherent in scaling at any cost.

If you choose to follow this bip 101 reckless abandon you will scale and die.



NOT scaling is just as risky if not more so.  Take a look at the charts. Observe the walls. I'm not advocating scaling at any cost.  I'm weighing the costs of scaling against the costs of not scaling.  You have a normalcy bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalcy_bias that prevents you from seeing the disaster ahead if we do nothing.  

At the very least, we should implement Garzik's kick-the-can BIP102 until it becomes obvious to anyone still not paying attention that we need a PREDICTABLE block size increase schedule or the new investments aren't going to come.  Markets hate uncertainty. This was a big problem. It's now become an urgent one as well.

The Market always has the last word. Look at the charts and try to figure out what the market is saying. Go ahead, take your time, but not too much. Not deciding is deciding on no change of course. That course is taking us down.



2646. Post 12305864 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on September 02, 2015, 05:34:10 AM

The support for BIP100 seems to be mostly (a) miners who like the idea of deciding things on their own, (b) nerds who like the proposal because it is a nerdish solution, and (c) Blockstream supporters who are pushing BIP100 as a "divide and conquer" strategy against Bitcoin[REDACTED].


Ahhh. I think the answer is (d)  people who mine over the notoriously slow TOR network to not pay taxes and buy drugs, etc.  I am all in favor of drugs and cheating on taxes, but not at the cost of choking the network. Those people can use dash or monero. 

I think this may be the real disagreement. The cost of going mainstream will be to push the black markets farther out to the crypto frontier. 




2647. Post 12309770 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

The whole block size/fork war is basically about scalability vs. anonymity. Larger block sizes make it harder or even impossible to mine over TOR. (TOR is slow because the signal bounces around through an onion router) At the extreme, XT could be used to blacklist TOR nodes (if every single XT user chose to keep the feature enabled). Highly improbable but possible.

But even vanilla BIP101 would make mining over TOR increasingly competitively disadvantageous.  What will likely happen is that miners who insist on anonymity will end up mining altcoins, trading alts for bitcoin and then transacting with btc. 

That may be a pain, but it will end up happening anyway regardless of block size.
I don't think anonymous bitcoin mining will be possible for long. Mining benefits from economies of scale. Larger mines are harder to keep secret. At some difficulty level, mining anonymously becomes less practical than buying anonymously.

Cripplecoiners want to sacrifice scalability in a FUTILE effort to preserve mining anonymity.  Just mine alts and trade them, Cripplecoiners.  Nobody is buying your arguments that you are protecting the block chain from code bloat and centralization.






2648. Post 12309895 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: findftp on September 02, 2015, 04:28:15 PM
The whole block size/fork war is basically about scalability vs. anonymity.

One big psyop to bring fear to the markets.
It's working. Cheap coins.

I don't think so. We are rapidly approaching the transaction limits of the network.  It will take a lot of work to patch the code with a hard fork before that happens. What will happen if consensus is not reached is that the network will bog down, transactions will not get confirmed for hours, days or even weeks, the market will crash and then we'll either fix the code with a real solution or more likely a small (2 to 8 MB) patch that kicks the can for a while and then we do the whole thing all over again later.

That would be a great time for someone to introduce WallStreetCoin and relegate us to being the myspace of crypto.

The market is reacting to real uncertainty.  



2649. Post 12310379 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: findftp on September 02, 2015, 05:34:08 PM

Ah, come on! You're trolling right?
There is no market except offchain speculation exchanges.

How many onchain trades did you execute last month?
We can all pretend there is a market outside the exchanges, but there isn't.

I buy gas cards through purse.io

Quote
Yes, let's adopt the can kicking forward technique, excellent.
Why not hardcode an infinite block size right away?

I've already argued that there doesn't need to be a hard coded limit at all because miners have the incentive to keep blocks small to allow their blocks to propagate across the network.  If the block is too big, they could lose their block reward.



Quote


These cripplecoins are always many magnitudes better than our current quasi finite monetary counterpart (gold)

That's true...except for capacity.  There is no limit to the number of gold transactions/second.  



2650. Post 12311325 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: aztecminer on September 02, 2015, 06:26:33 PM
China Scrambles To Enforce Capital Controls (Which Is Great News For Bitcoin)

Care to explain how capital controls are good for Bitcoin?  This is China we're talking about, do you suppose the government officials failed to consider that people might spirit away their money by "investing" it in foreign currencies, stockes, or even Bitcoin?


its gimped: http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/StreetTalk/jim-rogers-federal-reserve-economy-slowdown/2015/08/31/id/672878/

if the federal reserve rallies the stock market with more QE then all the money will go into stocks to ride the pump.

if QE fails and people start leaving the dollar then that is another story..

I have a lot of respect for Jim Rogers, but think about what you're saying: If QE IV fails, then we will be in a serious depression with DEFLATION.  Credit contraction will throw the money multiplier into reverse. Capital controls will compound the problem if they are implemented.

You are confusing the cause with the effect.  If the Fed resorts to more outright money printing (as opposed to merely keeping interest rates artificially low), then it means they (and by extension we) have already lost.  QE is straight up counterfeiting to reflate a bubble that has already popped.

People won't be leaving the dollar. The dollar will gain a lot of value because there won't be hardly any to go around.  TOO MUCH QE could cause hyperinflation, but only after a deflationary period.

Let's back up to look at the big picture: For decades, the cost of money has been artificially low because every little hiccup in the economy was treated with a dose of cheap credit.  The amount of private and public debt has gotten massive because some were borrowing to pay off earlier loans and others were borrowing to invest, chasing higher returns. Bubbles are caused by LEVERAGED investing. When the bubble pops, it's not the investors who suffer the lion's share of the loss. It's the creditors of those investors.

The banking system needs the equities bubbles to continue because if it doesn't, their losses will be so great as to make them insolvent. Not just a few banks. The entire system. No FDIC insurance can keep your deposits safe. 

Capital controls never work long term because it's like shutting the barn door after the horse has already escaped. Who in their right mind would invest in a country with capital controls? It's like throwing your money into a black hole. Even if your investments produce high returns, how can you get the money out to spend it? Crypto can and will be used to skirt capital controls but we don't have nearly the market liquidity or the network capacity to make a dent in the macro picture. 



2651. Post 12311579 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: findftp on September 02, 2015, 07:41:56 PM

These cripplecoins are always many magnitudes better than our current quasi finite monetary counterpart (gold)

That's true...except for capacity.  There is no limit to the number of gold transactions/second.  

Brings up an interesting point.
How many physical gold transactions are currently made in the market?

Physical? Hard to calculate. Every jeweler, coin shop, pawnshop, futures settlement, paper gold redemption, dentist, mint, speaker wire purchase and bottle of Goldschläger would have to be included. I'm certain it's orders of magnitude over 7 tps.



2652. Post 12311684 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: aztecminer on September 02, 2015, 07:56:59 PM

i know.. they shouldn't "trust in god" for the fed to print more money .. i know this.. but they do dumb stuff all the time.. i seriously doubt that after six and half years of #abusivehightaxes that obama is suddenly going to start sending everyone checks like bush did to stimulate the economy.. if the stock market starts to crash they will have to do something or the election is about how gimp obama's and the demoncrats economy is.. maybe china will stop doing what they are doing and we wont have to worry about what the janet yellen will do about it... all what you said might be right but we cannot forget that politics we have an election ..

We will have an election between bankster cadidate "A" and bankster candidate "B".  It's Kang and Kodos https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kang_and_Kodos, Giant Douche or a turd sandwich  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douche_and_Turd. The illusion of choice.  An anti-bankster candidate has zero chance. Look at what happened to Ron Paul.

The gov doesn't control the Banks. It's the other way around.  Just ask any Greek.



2653. Post 12311989 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: findftp on September 02, 2015, 08:26:20 PM

These cripplecoins are always many magnitudes better than our current quasi finite monetary counterpart (gold)

That's true...except for capacity.  There is no limit to the number of gold transactions/second.  

Brings up an interesting point.
How many physical gold transactions are currently made in the market?

Physical? Hard to calculate. Every jeweler, coin shop, pawnshop, futures settlement, paper gold redemption, dentist, mint, speaker wire purchase and bottle of Goldschläger would have to be included. I'm certain it's orders of magnitude over 7 tps.

Fair enough, I agree 7 tps is too small to cover current physical gold settlements although some are rather utility than investment grade settlements.


If there is no utility, then the investments are ponzi schemes. What gives Bitcoins their utility value is the ability to record titles and do timestamps of data on the blockchain.  With a transaction limit, that utility value is capped at the network transaction capacity.  A bitcoin that doesn't scale is like owning land where you are not allowed to develop it or use it for anything other than selling to some other sucker. Some people buy raw land like that in the hopes of use restrictions being relaxed in the future, but it is a huge gamble. That is the State of Bitcoin right now. Without a predictable schedule of blocksize increases, it's just a speculative bet, not an investment.



2654. Post 12314598 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: shmadz on September 03, 2015, 02:52:42 AM

Many people mocked me many pages ago for my concern that the block size could not simply scale exponentially for the next 20 years, but I still believe we are reaching the limits of physics and any further significant exponential type gains in computing power beyond asic will likely take us beyond the singularity. I just hope our new synthetic overlords accept bitcoin. (Ok, yes, I've been watching too much humans (tv show))

Block size MUST scale exponentially whether it's simple or not. A crypto with a block size limit is analogous to an Internet with a bandwidth limit of 56K modems.  No video. No VOIP. Vastly more limited functionality.  It may be hard, but don't fucking tell me it's impossible. Some other crypto will do it if we don't.




2655. Post 12315362 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 03, 2015, 05:49:07 AM

We should absolutely avoid the danger of instilling into Bitcoin users some kind of belief that they have a right to free transactions. Nothing in life is free and the costs of security & decentralization cannot forever be externalized to nodes & miners.

In that sense it is perfectly reasonable to suggest we should strive to keep block size limit as close as possible to actual network demand. Flex cap proposals are interesting in this aspect.

Those transactions aren't free for the user even if the miners eat the cost. They STILL have to suffer exchange rate risk while using bitcoin. If they have to pay a fee higher than nominal WHILE BITCOIN IS STILL IN ALPHA, for the vast majority of people, that just isn't worth it. 

Miners have to subsidize transaction costs to bootstrap usage or this baby will die in its crib. That's why you're getting the goddamn block reward. I am the customer. I am the user who buys your fucking coins. What am I getting for my money if I have to take this monster risk and have to pay a fee anyway?  VISA gives me cash back for chrissakes. They are your competition. If you can't beat them, you won't earn their customers.

Don't you small block fuckers know how business works?



2656. Post 12315500 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: Peter R on September 03, 2015, 07:15:33 AM
Why is that better than forcing the fee directly, and ensuring that the capacity is well above the demand?  (I ca think of several reasons why it is much worse.)

It's not.  In fact, Nicolas Houy shows in this paper that a block size limit is economically equivalent to a minimum fee:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2400519

One criticism of the minimum-fee approach is that it would be possible (albeit awkward) for miners to refund fees out-of-band.

I think this paper was quite helpful, however, one thing it did not consider is the fact that miners may have their blocks orphaned, thereby forfeiting the block reward.  This orphaning risk serves as a production cost for our new economic commodity called block space.  In this paper (which I know you've seen), I build from Nicolas Houy's work to show that if orphaning is included, that a healthy fee market would exist without a block size limit.

I bought into Bitcoin because I thought I WAS buying block space by buying bitcoin.  If I have to include fees, and am limited in my ability to use the block chain for title transfer and recording, timestamps and microtransactions, then it is analogous to buying raw land only to discover I am not allowed to build on or develop the land and also have to pay property taxes.  Have I been duped? Are the haters right when they say this is a scam?  Scarcity means nothing if their is no utility value also. There are only 21 million bitcoins, but a potentially infinite number of cryptocoins.  What makes BTC better than the rest? Network effects did not save Myspace.



2657. Post 12315727 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 03, 2015, 07:29:18 AM
do we really want Bitcoin to compete with Visa or is there another, possibly more valuable, use case for Bitcoin? What about digital gold? That sounds like an area where Bitcoin could thoroughly outcompete other players in its current state, with little to no change necessary. Why are we targeting to replace payment processors when we could somehow attract the incomparable value that resides in precious metal markets, offshore saving accounts and general safe havens? That sounds like a much more interesting moonshot if you ask me.

Gold has utility value. Even so, it has become a financial backwater. A "barbarous relic".   At least gold can be used for jewelry, dental fillings, electrical connections, etc.  It's been a poor store of value this century.

Bitcoin doesn't even have those advantages. Without the blockchain, Bitcoin is just another crypto and those are in infinite supply. How can a cryptographic token be a store of value without any utility value?  No micropayments? No remittances? no irreversable consumer payments?

The thing about Swiss bank accounts was that they were bank accounts, only secret.  There are several cryptocoins that are better at anonymity: Monero, Dash, etc.

The thing about gold is that it is not in alpha or beta, but has a five thousand year history.  After Gox, Silk Road and all the other thefts and scams, you really think Bitcoin can be seen as a safe haven?  With no utility value?? Are you fucking insane? 



2658. Post 12315888 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on September 03, 2015, 08:16:13 AM
#1 smoking gun problem with Bitcoin, not enough distinct miners make up 75% of hashing power. It is making me want to no longer be a HODLER as I think about it.

I'm thinking the same thing. I can't decide if these cripplecoiners are really that stupid or just plain evil. My inner conspiracy nut suspects that they are just waiting for us hodlers to dump and then they will suddenly see the light about block size and scalability. 



2659. Post 12315992 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 03, 2015, 08:40:38 AM
Discussing gold's "utility" value is absolutely a non-starter. Such a thing was scarcely considered in its history of human adoption as a store-of-wealth.

That's because no other metal was as recognizable, divisible, rare, etc.  Cryptocoins are all more or less equally fungible, recognizable, divisible, portable and rare.





Quote
How can you pretend Bitcoin has no utility value? Censorship resistant deflationary store of wealth is not good enough for you?

ALL cryptocoins are censorship resistant and some are more so and also more deflationary. 


[quote
At the risk of repeating myself, "a cryptographic token" gains value by attracting trust in its sound economic nature as digital gold. Why is it this trust can not be replicated in just any other altcoins you ask? Because: "Trust is a very organic process which takes an enormous amount of time". Bitcoin has 5 years of history for that trust to build on.
[/quote]

At the risk of pointing out the obvious: 5<5000             
also, there are no limits on gold transactions/second.   A throttled network capacity makes Bitcoin digital fool's gold.

At the risk of repeating myself also: Network effects didn't save MySpace.  I'm starting to think all those talking heads on the idiot box who said Bitcoin was too new, experimental and would be replaced by a better crypto  maybe had it right.



2660. Post 12316051 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 03, 2015, 08:46:12 AM


You do realize bigger blocks encourage mining centralization don't you?

We've discussed this ad nauseum. GPU mining caused centralization. Pools caused centralization. ASICS caused centralization.  Capitalism causes centralization because capital increases productivity and there are fewer people with capital than without. The only way around that is to leave the free market and that causes an even worse form of power centralization.
 
Growth causes centralization. I think you know this, but unlike you I think a certain degree of centralization is preferable to no growth.  



2661. Post 12316211 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 03, 2015, 09:12:46 AM
Bitcoin has an history and infrastructure that cannot be easily replicated.

Newsflash, dipshit: Bitcoin's infrastructure is as a payments network. Bitcoin's history means zip diddly squat if some other alt is backed by a bank with a 50 Billion dollar market cap.


Quote
In crypto 5 might as well be 5000 when referring to the competition.

against another grass roots bootstrapped alt, yes. Against an alt backed by a Fortune 500 company or billionaire with a slick multi-million dollar marketing campaign, no.


Quote
Your point about gold's transaction throughput is laughable. The limits on gold transaction and its very real cost is considerable given its physical nature. Even 7 tps accross the world is better than the transportability of gold.

yes, but your fees make the divisibility of BTC much more limited.  I'm pretty sure there are far more than seven global gold transactions per second. Even more when you count micropayments, like buying shots of Goldschlager. And, other than Government thugs, no assholes arguing that we should minimize them.



Quote
Comparing Bitcoin's network effect to MySpace where there is essentially no cost to the users for switching networks confirms you as just another simple noob. Did you buy this account? You can't have possibly registered in 2011 and utter such idiocy.

What's the cost of trading BTC for any alt on any one of a dozen exchanges? A fraction of a percent?  The only costs are paying your goddamn miner fees and waiting for your confirmations. It's not the switchers like me you need to worry about. It's the people who enter crypto going straight to the alt that better suits their needs.




2662. Post 12316341 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

If I'm not buying blockspace when I'm buying bitcoin, then what the hell am I buying? You can't charge rent on something you've already sold. That's not how business works. That's how the State works.

"Which is better - to be ruled by one tyrant three thousand miles away or by three thousand tyrants one mile away?" ~ Mather Byles

I dunno, Mather. Looks like the same shitty deal to me.



2663. Post 12316559 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 03, 2015, 09:50:09 AM

This is just beyond hilarious. Why the fuck would you even think a centralized payment network supported "by a Fortune 500 company or billionaire with a slick multi-million dollar marketing campaign" would bother creating a cryptocurrency. Do you understand the necessity for the blockchain and POW design and why it is totally worthless and ridiculously inefficient under centralized control?


Centralized control works for linux. It's better than the decision-making gridlock of the core devs.

To answer your question, we already have centralized control of code development, but an alt could have better management of code development. Maybe they just want a crypto that scales better and starting over from scratch is easier than convincing people like you to improve Bitcoin. They could pay for the marketing by selling pre-mined coins and kickstart mining with a guaranteed price floor. 

The maximum it would take to absolutely guarantee a 100MM market cap would be $100,000,000 but would almost certainly be a fraction of that.  Throw in a plunge protection team to smooth out the most extreme volatility and you'd have a coin anyone and everyone would want to buy or mine.



2664. Post 12316644 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 03, 2015, 10:03:55 AM
If I'm not buying blockspace when I'm buying bitcoin, then what the hell am I buying? You can't charge rent on something you've already sold. That's not how business works. That's how the State works.

"Which is better - to be ruled by one tyrant three thousand miles away or by three thousand tyrants one mile away?" ~ Mather Byles

I dunno, Mather. Looks like the same shitty deal to me.

How can you possibly equate buying bitcoin with buying block space  Huh

How's that supposed to work? How many "blockspace" do I get for 1 bitcoin?

Easy. 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain.  I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?



2665. Post 12316728 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on September 03, 2015, 10:27:36 AM
Blocksize limit already exists in the consensus rules, nobody from Blockstream forced it into them.

Again, it is possible that the devs do not see how wrong that argument is?

The max block size that was put into the rules in 2010 was not "1 MB" but "a value small enough to prevent big-block attack but still much larger than traffic so that it would not create spurious scarcity, and every transaction would be confirmed as quickly as possible." 

Blockstream now wants to change the max block size into "a value that makes block space scarce so that the fees will rise, even if transactions will be delayed by many blocks."  Is it possible that they don't realize that keeping the 1 MB limit as tre traffic crashes into it is a radical change in the protocol?

That new parameter -- the scarcity control -- happens to be 1 MB now, but they admit that they may set it to higher values in the future.  But always to values that will keep space in the blocks scarce.  Who decides how scarce?  Well, the devs ... or maybe the miners, but by grace and privilege of the devs...

Quote
[ Controlling the fees by defining the scarcity of block space ] is better [ than setting the fees directly ] because the block size limit also serves [ as ... ] a "check" on inherent economies of scale within mining which, removed, would necessarily lead to a precipitated centralization of mining.

There is NO evidence that the centralization of mining that happened so far was due to the natural growth in the block sizes, or that such growth would affect it in the foreseeable future.  That is just one of several dishonest FUD arguments that Adam Back used at one point.  The economies of scale that resulted in concentration of mining are due to the savings in the costs of equipment, space, electricity, cooling, personnel, management, etc.  that exist  for bulk purchasers and for certain geographic locations. 
[/quote]

That was well put, Professor. It's too bad you don't have a wallet. That is worth a tip.



2666. Post 12316755 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 03, 2015, 10:41:08 AM
If I'm not buying blockspace when I'm buying bitcoin, then what the hell am I buying? You can't charge rent on something you've already sold. That's not how business works. That's how the State works.

"Which is better - to be ruled by one tyrant three thousand miles away or by three thousand tyrants one mile away?" ~ Mather Byles

I dunno, Mather. Looks like the same shitty deal to me.

How can you possibly equate buying bitcoin with buying block space  Huh

How's that supposed to work? How many "blockspace" do I get for 1 bitcoin?

Easy. 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain.  I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?

You are buying space on the ledger, not the block. You need to pay to move these bitcoins to a different address on the ledger.

So for 1 bitcoin I get 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain? Are you for real? Were you hit over the head with something?

Nope. I get one twentyone millionth of the whole damn chain. 4 eva. If you think that's too much, then perhaps you are selling your coins too cheaply.



2667. Post 12316854 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 03, 2015, 10:56:17 AM
If I'm not buying blockspace when I'm buying bitcoin, then what the hell am I buying? You can't charge rent on something you've already sold. That's not how business works. That's how the State works.

"Which is better - to be ruled by one tyrant three thousand miles away or by three thousand tyrants one mile away?" ~ Mather Byles

I dunno, Mather. Looks like the same shitty deal to me.

How can you possibly equate buying bitcoin with buying block space  Huh

How's that supposed to work? How many "blockspace" do I get for 1 bitcoin?

Easy. 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain.  I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?

You are buying space on the ledger, not the block. You need to pay to move these bitcoins to a different address on the ledger.

So for 1 bitcoin I get 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain? Are you for real? Were you hit over the head with something?

Nope. I get one twentyone millionth of the whole damn chain. 4 eva. If you think that's too much, then perhaps you are selling your coins too cheaply.

Confusing the ledger composed of bitcoins with the chain... now that is something else!

Guys it looks like we had it wrong all along! We're not actually buying bitcoins! We're buying parts of the blockchain!

 Cheesy

Do you have any concept of what "the chain" is? Imma let you in on a killer deal: if you decide to run a full node, you will not only get 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain, you'll get ALL OF IT without having to spend a dime. Now isn't this AWESOME?  Grin

If you're not gonna answer my question, then it is fair to assume you don't have an answer.



2668. Post 12320171 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: aztecminer on September 03, 2015, 01:56:03 PM
bitfinex longs are climbing real good now .. we're not messing around anymore.. nothing can stop us now!

Buying now is risky. Buying now using leverage is insane. Barring small liquidity spikes, we're not going up until the block size thing is resolved months from now if ever. These longs have no money behind them or they wouldn't have to use leverage and pay the vig. What's worse, not nearly enough shorts to halt another flash crash when they cover. It's not looking good.



2669. Post 12321646 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: aztecminer on September 03, 2015, 06:43:25 PM
bitfinex longs are climbing real good now .. we're not messing around anymore.. nothing can stop us now!

Buying now is risky. Buying now using leverage is insane. Barring small liquidity spikes, we're not going up until the block size thing is resolved months from now if ever. These longs have no money behind them or they wouldn't have to use leverage and pay the vig. What's worse, not nearly enough shorts to halt another flash crash when they cover. It's not looking good.


sounds about right.. i don't know anything though about how shorts stop a flash crash if longs cover. however, more rumors coming from BFX is obviously not good. as long as there are strange things going on at BFX i wont be chasing the price buying into any pumps.

Shortsellers stop a flash crash when they cover and take profits. It's the longs getting margin squeezed that cause the crash. (as opposed to a regular orderly market dip)



2670. Post 12322113 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

My guess is the price is stable because miners are holding off selling, hoping the price will go up, but we aren't buying as long as the cripplecoiners have an effective veto on scalability.  In fact, I'm slowly selling to retail until this block size issue is resolved.  I'm planning on selling into any pump until then. It's hard because I've been a bull for so long, but I'm afraid a crash is the only way to convince small blockers of the error of their business model.



2671. Post 12323504 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: aztecminer on September 04, 2015, 02:10:49 AM
Looks like we have some movement on bitfinex. Yup, movement confirmed we have went up by $1. Hold onto your butts, we might up $1.05 before your know it  Wink


longs are rocketing upwards ..

Dollar swaps are up over $242,000 in the last 24 hrs, meaning over 1k of the btc bought were bought on margin.  So pretty much that entire pump was leveraged. Yeah, that's sustainable.  Roll Eyes

What's really interesting is that I'm now getting higher interest lending out my BTC for swaps as opposed to lending USD. That hasn't happened in a long time. BTC swaps are not going up much at all, but the interest rate is.  Weird. I guess a lot of lenders either decided that 0.02% wasn't enough to make it worthwhile or they just left BFX entirely. 



2672. Post 12324434 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Didn't see that coming. Good thing I'm still 90% long



2673. Post 12328526 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on September 04, 2015, 01:20:22 PM
So, it seems we are pretty much stuck between $220-$230 with no exciting moves. I guess it's just a good time to pick up more BTC.

You need to look for positives in every situation whatever your stance & agenda is with bitcoin. Now is a great time to buy, cheap coins. But if you're a bit of a pussy & you bought in sub 200 then take a profit & sell. There are good scenarios out of everything, you just need to look for them. Personally I'm buying every time I have spare fiat & HODLING, probably for at least 5 years.

It just doesn't make sense for me to sell at these prices.

That's what I was thinking when we were in the $400 range. It make sense to sell if:

1. It goes down further before going up.
2. It goes down and never comes back up.

Given the state of the block size impasse, one or the other has a real chance of happening.



2674. Post 12328727 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: meyer lansky on September 04, 2015, 02:39:35 PM
Huh Cry Roll Eyes :oplease i am new here.i want to buy and hoard bitcoins.my question is when is the right time to buy bitcoins at the cheapest price.thank you! Huh Undecided Cry

Saturday night. We often get a weekend discount after the paycheck Friday pump. Also, no wire transfers on weekends so bulls often run out of fiat and bears take advantage.

Of course, if too many people think that way, it doesn't happen.



2675. Post 12328852 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: gizmoh on September 04, 2015, 05:19:58 PM
How big of a deal is it if we go red again on weekly MACD?

Big deal for the $23 million in longs awaiting anxiously.  Roll Eyes

23.782 million, but who's counting?

Edit: 23.825 MM



2676. Post 12330513 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on September 04, 2015, 07:53:16 PM
How big of a deal is it if we go red again on weekly MACD?

Big deal for the $23 million in longs awaiting anxiously.  Roll Eyes

23.782 million, but who's counting?

Edit: 23.825 MM

I'm thinking that, despite the blocksize debate, or perhaps in spite of it, long is probably the way to go...

If we didn't get cheep coinz last week then it isn't going to happen.

common sense should prevail  Cheesy

Maybe not, buy it's doubtful we'll get expensive coins anytime soon, either.

http://www.coindesk.com/us-marshals-bitcoin-auction-2015/



2677. Post 12331814 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on September 04, 2015, 10:27:55 PM
How big of a deal is it if we go red again on weekly MACD?

Big deal for the $23 million in longs awaiting anxiously.  Roll Eyes

23.782 million, but who's counting?

Edit: 23.825 MM

I'm thinking that, despite the blocksize debate, or perhaps in spite of it, long is probably the way to go...

If we didn't get cheep coinz last week then it isn't going to happen.

common sense should prevail  Cheesy

Maybe not, buy it's doubtful we'll get expensive coins anytime soon, either.

http://www.coindesk.com/us-marshals-bitcoin-auction-2015/
Final Silk Road Bitcoin Auction
Final
Fin.

do you think anyone will every be able to pick up this many bitcoin without and spillage ever again, this is bullish news.

its finally coming soon, the last chance to get a butt load of cheap coins for only ~20-50% over current market rates.

Yeah, the final auction. It might be a good time to buy soon, but probably not yet.



2678. Post 12332106 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: aztecminer on September 05, 2015, 01:49:28 AM
How big of a deal is it if we go red again on weekly MACD?

Big deal for the $23 million in longs awaiting anxiously.  Roll Eyes

23.782 million, but who's counting?

Edit: 23.825 MM

I'm thinking that, despite the blocksize debate, or perhaps in spite of it, long is probably the way to go...

If we didn't get cheep coinz last week then it isn't going to happen.

common sense should prevail  Cheesy

Maybe not, buy it's doubtful we'll get expensive coins anytime soon, either.

http://www.coindesk.com/us-marshals-bitcoin-auction-2015/
Final Silk Road Bitcoin Auction
Final
Fin.

do you think anyone will every be able to pick up this many bitcoin without and spillage ever again, this is bullish news.

its finally coming soon, the last chance to get a butt load of cheap coins for only ~20-50% over current market rates.

Yeah, the final auction. It might be a good time to buy soon, but probably not yet.


where did your "four punch raiders" go ?? ... have u not noticed all the chinese miners quit dumping, the chinese stopped panicing, and the raiders stopped raiding ??

They didn't just raid the bulls. Shorts got squeezed too. I imagine They've either moved on or altered strategies when the pattern became too well known. 



2679. Post 12343706 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Looks like the Saturday night dip has been postponed due to the long Labor Day weekend in the U.S.

I had a 3 point something BTC sell order trip on bitquick, so I immediately arbitraged to capture the spread.

Put in a 1 BTC sell order @ ~$240 which tripped overnight to lock in a little profit. What concerns me is that with those shorts getting squeezed, it looks like there is an air pocket under current price and over 24 hrs to go before many people can wire money to slow a slide should one materialize.

On the fundamental side, I continue to think that ~7 transactions per second is a ridiculously low network capacity that threatens to relegate Bitcoin to a proof-of-concept that others will surpass. Blyth Masters is wasting no time:

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/21028/blythe-masters-digital-asset-holdings-acquires-hyperledger-bits-proof/

"Hyperledger does not have an inbuilt cryptocurrency and uses a proven consensus algorithm capable of thousands of transactions per second."

Thousands. Part of the promise of Bitcoin is not just decentralization, but also DISINTERMEDIATION.  We can't cut out the middleman if we don't have the network capacity to remain a PEER to PEER value transfer solution.
Seven TPS or even fourteen or forty will keep us from fulfilling that promise.



2680. Post 12343967 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: natewelt on September 06, 2015, 02:01:57 PM



Don't let your bearishness cloud your judgement. See the trend for what it is...bullish.

 A short squeeze followed by a low volume melt up is simply a short term reversal of a downtrend since the ~$316 top. Whether we are in an uptrend or downtrend depends on your time horizon. The fact is we are range trading until we aren't.



2681. Post 12344522 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: natewelt on September 06, 2015, 02:26:10 PM



Don't let your bearishness cloud your judgement. See the trend for what it is...bullish.

 A short squeeze followed by a low volume melt up is simply a short term reversal of a downtrend since the ~$316 top. Whether we are in an uptrend or downtrend depends on your time horizon. The fact is we are range trading until we aren't.


I am talking about the very short term. What I've seen over the past 3 days has been very bullish. Probably need to sustain 260-270 to become more intermediate/long-term bullish, but what we have is a nice start.

I'm just trying to get people to understand that you do what the trend says, not what your position is. Obviously, based on whatever your time horizon is.

Edit: What range are you speaking of? It seems like breaking above 240 was the breakout of the short term range?

I'm talking about the $160 to $315 range we've been in this year. 



2682. Post 12345012 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on September 06, 2015, 03:44:39 PM


Into the 240's I see. Nice little surprise, but where are the double digit couns we were promised as a result of Hearn's (FAIL) XT plan? Bitcoin is not going anywhere & will not be destroyed by a pair of power hungry ass holes.

No, Bitcoin is going to fade into irrelevance because of a 7 transaction per minute network capacity unless someone (perhaps a pair of power hungry assholes) can save it.

don't confuse a symptom with the disease.



2683. Post 12354480 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Using the estimate of Seven Transactions per Second,  the network is capable of handling only ~ 604800 transactions a day. That's not even enough for one million people to use on a daily basis.  Bitcoin will never be able to replace fiat even if it scales up 100X. or 1000X.

Bitcoin was designed as an electronic peer to peer cash system. Lack of scalability is clearly a severe limit to adoption in that regard.  It may be useful for other purposes, but each time it is used for something else, it's capacity as an electronic peer to peer cash system is reduced. 


When I first read the story of the Coinwallet stress test, I thought immediately that they were planning to do something harmful, but then I thought about it.  Bitcoin is antifragile. It needs to be stressed so that it can grow stronger.  Is there even a working process for increasing scalability? We may find out soon. If there isn't one, then knowledge of that deficiency will be the first step towards solving it.




2684. Post 12363368 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

The dollar weakened, so assets denominated in dollars went up, all things else being equal.  

Fundamental issues as I see them:

1. Bitcoin is a poor unit of account because it is too volatile (although this is decreasing)
2. Bitcoin is a poor medium of exchange (network capacity of 7 TPS is far too low)
3. Bitcoin is a poor store of value (not enough liquidity to be an easily marketable commodity)

This seems strange considering Bitcoin's properties of being recognizable, transportable, fungible, divisible, and scarce.  

It seems to me that the most likely path to mainstream adoption would be through microtransactions, when a unit of account need not be closely correlated with store-of-value, but of course nobody wants to invest in microtransaction applications with the network capacity/block size limit uncertainty.  It's impossible to build a business model based on an unknown fee structure.  





2685. Post 12364034 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on September 08, 2015, 05:11:38 PM
The dollar weakened, so assets denominated in dollars went up, all things else being equal. 

Fundamental issues as I see them:

1. Bitcoin is a poor unit of account because it is too volatile (although this is decreasing)
2. Bitcoin is a poor medium of exchange (network capacity of 7 TPS is far too low)
3. Bitcoin is a poor store of value (not enough liquidity to be an easily marketable commodity)

This seems strange considering Bitcoin's properties of being recognizable, transportable, fungible, divisible, and scarce. 

It seems to me that the most likely path to mainstream adoption would be through microtransactions, when a unit of account need not be closely correlated with store-of-value, but of course nobody wants to invest in microtransaction applications with the network capacity/block size limit uncertainty.  It's impossible to build a business model based on an unknown fee structure. 

0. Bitcoin supporters are so batshit insane that many folks simply don't want to be associated with them.

That's not a valid reason at all. Economics is all about incentives. Given a strong enough incentive, racists will hire minorities, Sexists will hire women, Anti-semites will do business with Jews and Homophobes will provide goods and services to gays. History is littered with sane people lining up to be associated with whackjobs when they had an incentive to do so. 

" It's not personal, Sonny. It's strictly business." ~Michael Corleone




2686. Post 12364165 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 08, 2015, 06:08:22 PM
The dollar weakened, so assets denominated in dollars went up, all things else being equal.  

Fundamental issues as I see them:

1. Bitcoin is a poor unit of account because it is too volatile (although this is decreasing)
2. Bitcoin is a poor medium of exchange (network capacity of 7 TPS is far too low)
3. Bitcoin is a poor store of value (not enough liquidity to be an easily marketable commodity)

This seems strange considering Bitcoin's properties of being recognizable, transportable, fungible, divisible, and scarce.  

It seems to me that the most likely path to mainstream adoption would be through microtransactions, when a unit of account need not be closely correlated with store-of-value, but of course nobody wants to invest in microtransaction applications with the network capacity/block size limit uncertainty.  It's impossible to build a business model based on an unknown fee structure.  


What random straw man arguments!!!!!

NONE of your listed fundamental issues are problematic for bitcoin at this stage in its life, and maybe NOT even into the future.  Bitcoin remains a growing phenomenon with ongoing development, and its infrastructure is well capable of expanding capacity as soon as people begin to jump on board.  Surely there is a bit of a catch 22 because additional people may be hesitant to jump on board if they are worried about future devaluation... but as more people jump on board, the price increases causing more interest and causing more need to expand, build and modify existing systems, including user friendliness.

That's the most perfect example of a circular argument I can Imagine. You need a reason to "jump on board" other than "people are jumping on board".  Investors are forward thinking, so future problems, particularly FORESEEABLE problems such as scalability, affect investment NOW.



2687. Post 12364742 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on September 08, 2015, 06:37:32 PM

0. Bitcoin supporters are so batshit insane that many folks simply don't want to be associated with them.

That's not a valid reason at all. Economics is all about incentives. Given a strong enough incentive, racists will hire minorities, Sexists will hire women, Anti-semites will do business with Jews and Homophobes will provide goods and services to gays. History is littered with sane people lining up to be associated with whackjobs when they had an incentive to do so. 

" It's not personal, Sonny. It's strictly business." ~Michael Corleone



You've got it all in reverse, Women won't hire sexists, Jews won't hire Antisemites and Homosexuals won't hire Homophobes. Bitcoiners are the ones who want to bring on economic Armageddon, want to evade taxes, subvert the government and who hold a fundamentalist attitude.
It's the Bitcoiners that subscribe to the us versus them mentality not normal people.

Do I? Women complain all the time that their bosses are sexist. Many minorities, possibly even most of them believe or suspect that their employers are racists. So why work for them? Because to them, it's better than the alternatives. It's all about the incentives, Man.   

I could argue that your characterization of bitcoiners is a straw man, but there's no point because it's irrelevant.  The price of gold isn't determined by the goldbug's whack conspiracy theories. It's determined by supply and demand. It doesn't fucking matter. The issue holding bitcoin back is scalability and network capacity.  Everything else is incidental. Branding only matters when deciding between two or more nearly identical choices. Coke or Pepsi. Visa or Mastercard.




2688. Post 12365189 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 08, 2015, 07:31:05 PM
... and really some of the extent of your drama or exaggeration seems to be attempting to cause an effect rather than really talking about the real state of bitcoin today.

That's partially true and I'll be the first to admit it. I want the price to go down IF it leads to cause the core devs to implement a workable scale patch or else leads to some other group replacing them. I want bitcoin to succeed as an electronic peer to peer cash system as it was designed, not as some cloistered settlement network only used by the same assholes who run the current system. 

Fiat money is debt. It is lent into existence. That makes the entire global financial system a giant pyramid scheme. I don't have to wish for economic Armageddon to see one coming (or more likely a series of disasters  eventually having the same effect). I don't have to cause it or contribute to causing it. It's going to happen as a mathematical certainty.  If we don't find a way to escape the system, we will go down with it.   

A network capacity of seven transactions/sec is a life boat with very few seats.



2689. Post 12365631 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: dragonseer on September 08, 2015, 08:19:24 PM
... and really some of the extent of your drama or exaggeration seems to be attempting to cause an effect rather than really talking about the real state of bitcoin today.

That's partially true and I'll be the first to admit it. I want the price to go down IF it leads to cause the core devs to implement a workable scale patch or else leads to some other group replacing them. I want bitcoin to succeed as an electronic peer to peer cash system as it was designed, not as some cloistered settlement network only used by the same assholes who run the current system. 

Fiat money is debt. It is lent into existence. That makes the entire global financial system a giant pyramid scheme. I don't have to wish for economic Armageddon to see one coming (or more likely a series of disasters  eventually having the same effect). I don't have to cause it or contribute to causing it. It's going to happen as a mathematical certainty.  If we don't find a way to escape the system, we will go down with it.   

A network capacity of seven transactions/sec is a life boat with very few seats.

Because this argument surfaces here all the time, I'll down put my thoughts on how this whole scaling issue is a problem that only exists because Bitcoin, or it's community, doesn't know to have a relationship with other coins. Let's say you have a Merchant that takes Litecoins, Quark, whatever as a peer to peer cash system at their place of business. At the end of the business day, the merchant consolidates their transactions into one Bitcoin transaction. This seems to be the same scenario that is being talked about as a 'Lightning Sidechain', except Core developers aren't invoking the dirty word of 'altcoin'. In this case, Bitcoin doesn't need to fork, because it isn't trying to be a single solution to this problem, and I'm not sure BIP 100, BIP 101 or whatever will enable Bitcoin to cope with this 'Mass Adoption' scenario anyway.

The network can only handle about half a million transactions per day reliably. Even IF we used alts for purchases and Bitcoin for settlements, it still wouldn't be fast enough.  Money is useful because it eliminated the need for a double coincidence of wants under barter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coincidence_of_wants.  There has to be a "most marketable commodity" and that commodity is by definition "money".  If ANY crypto becomes money, it can only do so if the network has the capacity to handle that function. 

We're not even close to dealing with "mass adoption" yet.  We need enough capacity to avoid gridlock before we even get started on that. 



2690. Post 12366284 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: Norway on September 08, 2015, 09:43:37 PM
Is it still time to hire some strippers (of both sexes, of course) for that kumbaya session devs are having in Canada?

Nerd egos are stubborn things, might be a good idea to soften up the mood. Make 'em mellow.



Still time? The Backpage-situation graduated all the exotic dancers in Bitcoin 101. International payments to Canada to these entrepeneurs only take seconds / minutes (depending on of much they trust zero confirmations).

And they start saturday! Plenty of time! Let's feed those bras with digital cash!  Cheesy

Hopefully, on monday you all will understand that scaling is not a big problem. Because all miners/nodes/pools/whatever do NOT need to confirm every bleeping transaction. The computer work can be easily shared. The big work isn't processing transactions. It's mining.  Wink

I suspect backpagers buy the majority of my coins on bitquick.co.  it's nice because I can arbitrage the spread and buy back immediately at a lower rate on an exchange, but of course I'm really just selling my risk of getting my bank account seized in the event that some bureaucrat somewhere decides it's money laundering and retroactively applies the decision to me. So I have to constantly drain the account to minimize the risk. I also have to buy back in immediately to minimize the exchange rate risk because the most buyers come in during an uptrend.  A five dollar bump in three hours can wipe out any profit.

buying gas cards on purse.io is similarly problematic. I get a ~20% discount on the card, but I have to exchange the gamestop card for a shell card at a brick-and-mortar store which takes time and money, THEN I can only buy fuel at Shell stations which typically overcharge ~5% for fuel.

Once I have enough profit to cover living expenses, I crank up the premium I ask for on bitquick and crank up the discount I demand on purse.io.  If nobody bites, it's no big deal. If they do, that's less work for me in the future.

Arbitraging is the only way I know to make profits without burning through my stack, except of course lending out coins on bfx but the vig is still pretty low. For bigger profits that that, one must OBSERVE THE WALL and get lucky.






2691. Post 12366545 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: Norway on September 08, 2015, 10:30:12 PM
Is it still time to hire some strippers (of both sexes, of course) for that kumbaya session devs are having in Canada?

Nerd egos are stubborn things, might be a good idea to soften up the mood. Make 'em mellow.



Still time? The Backpage-situation graduated all the exotic dancers in Bitcoin 101. International payments to Canada to these entrepeneurs only take seconds / minutes (depending on of much they trust zero confirmations).

And they start saturday! Plenty of time! Let's feed those bras with digital cash!  Cheesy

Hopefully, on monday you all will understand that scaling is not a big problem. Because all miners/nodes/pools/whatever do NOT need to confirm every bleeping transaction. The computer work can be easily shared. The big work isn't processing transactions. It's mining.  Wink

I suspect backpagers buy the majority of my coins on bitquick.co.  it's nice because I can arbitrage the spread and buy back immediately at a lower rate on an exchange, but of course I'm really just selling my risk of getting my bank account seized in the event that some bureaucrat somewhere decides it's money laundering and retroactively applies the decision to me. So I have to constantly drain the account to minimize the risk. I also have to buy back in immediately to minimize the exchange rate risk because the most buyers come in during an uptrend.  A five dollar bump in three hours can wipe out any profit.

buying gas cards on purse.io is similarly problematic. I get a ~20% discount on the card, but I have to exchange the gamestop card for a shell card at a brick-and-mortar store which takes time and money, THEN I can only buy fuel at Shell stations which typically overcharge ~5% for fuel.

Once I have enough profit to cover living expenses, I crank up the premium I ask for on bitquick and crank up the discount I demand on purse.io.  If nobody bites, it's no big deal. If they do, that's less work for me in the future.

Arbitraging is the only way I know to make profits without burning through my stack, except of course lending out coins on bfx but the vig is still pretty low. For bigger profits that that, one must OBSERVE THE WALL and get lucky.


Chill, BJ! Life is fun! "Sell" your coins to them at a hotel room!

To me, that would be like walking past apple trees to buy apples at the store. Plenty of slutty girls out there give it up for a drink or two.  Here's the trick:
1. Be around 'em
2. Ignore them
3. Look like you're having more fun than them.

Hell, sometimes they buy ME drinks.



2692. Post 12375207 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: gentlemand on September 09, 2015, 08:44:49 PM
Visa, Nasdaq and other special friends invest $30 mil in Chain Inc.

http://www.nasdaq.com/article/visa-nasdaq-others-invest-30-million-in-bitcoinrelated-startup--update-20150909-01380

As ever more blockchain, no Bitcoin, but an interesting development all the same.

Well yeah. Blockchains are great. 7 TPS not so much.



2693. Post 12375407 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

from Forbes:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2015/09/09/bitcoins-shared-ledger-technology-moneys-new-operating-system/2/

"Here’s how primitive the infrastructure is now: The Bitcoin blockchain can currently handle 7 transactions a second, while credit card giant Visa can process 56,000. No wonder Bitcoin players liken the current state of the technology to the Internet of 1994 and 1995, a time when going online meant dialing up AOL and connecting at 14.4 kilobytes per second."



2694. Post 12375565 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 09, 2015, 08:59:55 PM
Visa, Nasdaq and other special friends invest $30 mil in Chain Inc.

http://www.nasdaq.com/article/visa-nasdaq-others-invest-30-million-in-bitcoinrelated-startup--update-20150909-01380

As ever more blockchain, no Bitcoin, but an interesting development all the same.

Well yeah. Blockchains are great. 7 TPS not so much.

Maybe we can get our hands on some space from these blockchains? Do you know what they're going for?

currently ~$240X25 or $6000/MB   way too much if you ask me. Judging by the price trajectory, more and more buyers agree with me.



2695. Post 12375684 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on September 09, 2015, 09:46:38 PM
Hey BJA, when did you become such a pessimist? I use to enjoy reading your posts.

When I found out the core devs were idiots.



2696. Post 12375968 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on September 09, 2015, 09:52:29 PM
Hey BJA, when did you become such a pessimist? I use to enjoy reading your posts.

When I found out the core devs were idiots.

First Aztec, now you. DESPAIR!!!

CHOO CHOO!!!!

You know who else felt despair? investors in Worldcom, Lehman Bros, etc.



2697. Post 12376060 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on September 09, 2015, 10:35:06 PM
Hey BJA, when did you become such a pessimist? I use to enjoy reading your posts.

When I found out the core devs were idiots.

First Aztec, now you. DESPAIR!!!

CHOO CHOO!!!!

You know who else felt despair? investors in Worldcom, Lehman Bros, etc.

Oh yeah! Squirm my little Redneck Muse!

Mooooooon!!!!

I'll get right on that.  Roll Eyes



2698. Post 12377969 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

$237.  The market is saying what it thinks about 7 tps.



2699. Post 12382034 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: koryu on September 10, 2015, 01:35:46 PM
1week candle just turned green. ccmf!

as the weekly MACD turned negative. We may go up a little from hear, but I'm looking for an exit point.




2700. Post 12382114 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: meyer lansky on September 10, 2015, 02:52:26 PM
hmmmmmm.......since i am afraid that bitcoinXT will be supported,''Bitcoin XT contains an unmentioned addition which periodically downloads lists of Tor IP addresses for blacklisting...... ''https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162684.20'' .the main characteristic feature-anonymity of bitcoin will be dead....truly not all that glitters is gold! Huh Embarrassed Lips sealed Undecided

Geez, Newbie. It's a trivial matter to turn off the I.P. "blacklisting". It's just a feature for nodes that don't want to deal with slow-ass onion routing.

These objections to larger block sizes seem disingenuous. It appears to be just a miner power grab, and a wrong-headed one at that. The real way to create a market for miner fees is to expand adoption, not squeeze the current users.   



2701. Post 12383292 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 10, 2015, 04:59:21 PM
hmmmmmm.......since i am afraid that bitcoinXT will be supported,''Bitcoin XT contains an unmentioned addition which periodically downloads lists of Tor IP addresses for blacklisting...... ''https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162684.20'' .the main characteristic feature-anonymity of bitcoin will be dead....truly not all that glitters is gold! Huh Embarrassed Lips sealed Undecided

Geez, Newbie. It's a trivial matter to turn off the I.P. "blacklisting". It's just a feature for nodes that don't want to deal with slow-ass onion routing.

These objections to larger block sizes seem disingenuous. It appears to be just a miner power grab, and a wrong-headed one at that. The real way to create a market for miner fees is to expand adoption, not squeeze the current users.  

Erhmmm  Roll Eyes

How's that supposed to work? How many "blockspace" do I get for 1 bitcoin?

Easy. 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain.  I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?

Give it a rest already. It should have been obvious that I wasn't being literal. Do you has Asperger's Syndrome?



2702. Post 12383375 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on September 10, 2015, 04:56:16 PM
So... CoinWallet.eu stress test "cancelled"? Actually, they're just shifting the blame on to the community by giving away "free money": https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1175321

Stress test is a go.

Bonus points for Antpool mining every single block in the last hour.




Thanks for the update. Do you think the traffic is somehow giving Antpool an advantage?



2703. Post 12397107 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on September 12, 2015, 03:10:49 AM
"Zero cost"... Aside from the cost of nearly every major hodler of bitcoin dumping them instantaneously if the 21 mil cap is put in serious jeopardy.

That is not "cost".  Even if bitcoins lose all their value, no resources or concrete assets will be destroyed.  The world will not become any poorer. Only, a few hundred thousand people who expected to get hold one day of mansions and Lamborghinis  will see those hopes vaporize, and those assets go to other people instead.

I don't think however that the introduction of extra inflation into bitcoin -- say, 1% per year, beyond the block rewards -- would necessarily induce all holders to dump, and the price to crash.  

In late 2013, when I first learned about bitcon, the Gospel of Antonopoulos was that bitcoins would become extremely valuable because they would replace credit cards and other traditional digital payments, and then demand for that use would drive the price up, according to the money velocity equation.  Moreover, that would happen very soon, because the price had been growing 1000% per year, and no one could look at that straight line on the log plot and doubt that it would continue.

Well, 1% of inflation per year would not destroy that argument; at most, it would delay the growth a little.  After all,  that growth of 1000% per year happened while the miners were creating an inflation of more than 10% per year.

But the Gospel has changed several times since then.  Mircea, for example, wants us to believe that the "Moon" will come just because the supply is fixed.  Even if it were true -- again, 1% of inflation per year, even extended for 20 years, could not possibly prevent the price from rising 1000% in that interval.

Blockstream, on the other hand, wants us to believe that bitcoin will go to the Moon because not only the supply will be capped by 21 million, but the transactions will be capped to 150'000--180'000 per day, and somehw that will induce some companies to pay more for bitcoins. Whatever.  Again, 1% inflation per year cannot possibly spoil such a powerful "whatever".

But, on the other hand,  I agree with one thing: it is very unlikely that those "20 businessmen" who will decide the future of bitcoin will ever agree to putting any sort of inflation or demurrage in it.  That was not a prediction that I was making.  My point was only that the 21 million cap is not "guaranteed by math", but only by people.

I still believe that bitcon's price will go to zero in a few years; but almost certainly not by that route...


You really don't know much about economics, do you Professor? Try appraoching the issue from a different direction: Bitcoin price is fueled by speculative investors. These people are forward thinking. They don't buy BTC based on current utility value, but implied future utility value. Just as stocks are valued by implied (and discounted) future rate of returns, we are betting that these cryptographic token thingies will become (more) useful down the road.  Basically we are paying for the right to write on a very secure immutable ledger in the future. ANY inflation beyond the baked-in block reward means that the ledger will get diluted and polluted with extra data to a degree that we hitherto didn't factor in. Also, there is the slippery slope of if we can increase by 1% after so many assurances that it would NEVER happen, you have to add the uncertainty that this inflation rate may be adjusted higher in the future.  

Why do you think there is so much hand-wringing about the Federal Reserve's proposed 0.25% rate increase? it would mean almost nothing on it's own, but Wall Street knows rate increases are almost never a one-off. They are likely followed by more increases.  They know the Fed wants 'normalized" rates in the vicinity of 5 to 8%, and that Yellen will keep hiking until either she gets there or causes another recession.

Economics is the science of studying incentives. The challenge for an economist is to look for the HIDDEN costs (often opportunity costs) and unintended consequences of a given policy.  No change happens in a vacuum and ripple effects can permeate the whole system.  



2704. Post 12403065 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on September 12, 2015, 06:14:56 PM


One of them is the expectation of huge increases in value, resulting from the fixed cap and the assumption that it would replace other means of payment.  That turned bitcoin into an allegedly safe and lucrative investment, and a speculation tool.  Most of the big problems that bitcoin is facing today are a consequence of that undue retargeting of the project.


Again, economics, Professor. "Hoarders" is just a disparaging term for savers. Any economy needs savings for capital formation.  If the very first cave man hadn't deferred consumption in order to have time to to make a spear that would make him a more efficient hunter, we'd all still be living in trees.



2705. Post 12403271 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Monopoly on September 12, 2015, 09:13:48 PM
IF we will reach to %75 XT nodes the fork will occur ...... Is there any solution for avoid the fork ? or Bitcoin project will fail ?

no. if 75% of nodes switch, then XT becomes Bitcoin and core becomes a dead branch, a string of orphaned blocks.  Then all the money sitting on the sidelines will start pouring in because we will finally have a network that scales.



2706. Post 12405189 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on September 13, 2015, 03:49:13 AM
"Hoarders" is just a disparaging term for savers. Any economy needs savings for capital formation.

"Saver" i a very general term.  In the context of this discussion a "hoarder" is one who saves by colelcting a currency. Not meant to be disparaging -- although that is usually not a wise way to save.

Collecting a currency is a way of saving that ensures a certain amount of liquidity and flexibility. I own some land that may turn out to be a better investment, but I can't sell a small piece of it if I need some cash and I certainly can't sell it fast.  Collecting the Real sure as shit ain't a wise way to save, I'll give you that.

If there is no incentive for people to consume less than they produce, most people obviously won't. The more incentive to save, the more people will save and the more they will save.  That doesn't mean the capital is idle. It means that they are lending it out to someone who has a use for it now, or they are holding and communicating a price signal in the market saying that the stuff they could have bought but chose not to is too expensive. 

Capital makes work more productive. A lumberjack with a chainsaw is more productive than one with an axe. Capital only comes from deferred consumption. Sustainable economic growth can only come from differed consumption. Having some central banksters or government bureaucrats distorting the price signals only causes harm.



2707. Post 12406243 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Hopalong on September 13, 2015, 08:00:19 AM
Can you imagine a design of cryptocurrency that would be to your liking, or is the concept as a whole damned to failure in your mind?

Hopefully that negative interest would be enough to dissuade hoarders and speculators.  


Most of this forum think the inflation of fiat currencies is a bad thing and that bitcoin has solved a problem with its fixed supply. They dont understand that inflation is a very important tool to keep investments going.


Imagine your national currency without inflation. The money you have in your pocket would never loose value. Seems nice if you dont have a lot of money but what happen if you had a lot of money. You could just hoard the money and live of ot for the rest of your life. There would be no interest in investing to make more money since investing is a risk.

With todays inflating fiat there is no point in hoarding money. Your money supply loose value if you just hoard them. You have to get the money out there and work for you. Either by investing or putting them in a bank and let them invest for you.

A fixed supply economy like bitcoin would be the end of investing. Why invest if you can just hodl to increase your holdings.

Perhaps you didn't read up where I explained that "hoarding" is savings and it is absolutely essential for a healthy economy.  If there is no incentive to consume less than one produces, an entire economy's wealth is stagnant at best and consumed in one generation at worst.  We are currently watching this play out on a global scale.

It's laughable to claim that there would be no investing with a deflationary currency. The late nineteenth century in America saw prices fall almost everywhere and a massive increase in the standard of living. People would still spend a currency even if they knew it would go up in value forever because nobody lives forever. They just wouldn't spend it frivolously. That's a bad thing? We all need billboard-sized flat screen television sets and a new car every two years?



2708. Post 12408098 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Hopalong on September 13, 2015, 09:13:54 AM
Can you imagine a design of cryptocurrency that would be to your liking, or is the concept as a whole damned to failure in your mind?

Hopefully that negative interest would be enough to dissuade hoarders and speculators.  


Most of this forum think the inflation of fiat currencies is a bad thing and that bitcoin has solved a problem with its fixed supply. They dont understand that inflation is a very important tool to keep investments going.


Imagine your national currency without inflation. The money you have in your pocket would never loose value. Seems nice if you dont have a lot of money but what happen if you had a lot of money. You could just hoard the money and live of ot for the rest of your life. There would be no interest in investing to make more money since investing is a risk.

With todays inflating fiat there is no point in hoarding money. Your money supply loose value if you just hoard them. You have to get the money out there and work for you. Either by investing or putting them in a bank and let them invest for you.

A fixed supply economy like bitcoin would be the end of investing. Why invest if you can just hodl to increase your holdings.

Perhaps you didn't read up where I explained that "hoarding" is savings and it is absolutely essential for a healthy economy.  If there is no incentive to consume less than one produces, an entire economy's wealth is stagnant at best and consumed in one generation at worst.  We are currently watching this play out on a global scale.

It's laughable to claim that there would be no investing with a deflationary currency. The late nineteenth century in America saw prices fall almost everywhere and a massive increase in the standard of living. People would still spend a currency even if they knew it would go up in value forever because nobody lives forever. They just wouldn't spend it frivolously. That's a bad thing? We all need billboard-sized flat screen television sets and a new car every two years?

You must separate normal working people and rich people as i tried to do. Buying a new television is not investing. Building a sky skraper is investing.

Inflation gives those with a lot of money a push to get their money invested somewhere or it will loose value. A fixed supply coin like bitcoin is not good for investing but for holding. If we imagine a future with mainstream use of bitcoin it would be better to hold your bitcoin than to use them. The more you hold the more you earn because the value only goes up. Only stupid people would invest money they know would increase value into anything that might be risky. Thats why national banks will force inflation to the right level. To low inflation would ruin the economy since all investments stops. To high inflation is also bad since it makes people swap their money for something that will hold value and nobody invests.

The fixed supply of bitcoin is only good for speculation like this thread is about. Knowing what the supply is and what it will be in the future makes it easier to do the right moves when you trade.

Separate "normal working people" from rich people? I completely disagree. "Rich" people need to save for truck factories the same way that people like me need to save for a truck.  People who are pressured to spend their savings before it gets diluted through inflation are more likely to misallocate their capital. They could for example build a solar panel factory only to find that technological advances makes their solar panels obsolete. 

The people who make the argument for inflation because it frees up capital are short-sighted.  Capital that is freed up by definition is not available for future use.



2709. Post 12415969 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on September 14, 2015, 08:55:39 AM
In any case, I would like to hear which 16th century mind argued for inflation, especially as currency was specie.

Economists now are still in the Alchemist stage. Its mostly just pseudo-science.

As I wrote already, I was referring to Gresham's Law (aka Copernicus's Law).  It is stated in terms of face value vs intrinsic value, but the phenomenon applies to bitcoin vs national money: if a currency is  [ perceived as being ] more solid than another, people will hoard one and spend the other.

Huh To the degree that ancient historians wrote about political economy, they almost to a man condemned the emperor's debasement of the coinage. Copper was added to gold coins and the gold contents steadily decreased, causing all sorts of economic havoc.  This type of deflation was primarily used for the same purpose that today's inflation is often used: to finance war. 

Just because bad money drives out good, it's no reason to advocate bad money. If anything, it's a reason to repeal all legal tender laws altogether and let the free market sort it out.



2710. Post 12450290 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: hdbuck on September 17, 2015, 06:13:15 PM

lol, how surprising.
i thought the US revived its "growth" and that its economy was "healthy" as ever?

Grin

Rates are going to go negative before they go up (which is prolly never).  The banks have effectively zero reserves if you account for underperforming loans, so the only capital they have to lend out is money they borrow from the Fed at lower interest rates than they charge.  There is no way out of this trap. If they book the loan losses, they become (or more accurately are revealed to be) insolvent.  

It's not a fractional reserve system anymore. It's a zero reserve system kept on life support by a zero interest rate policy.  There is no real capital formation, only loans available with the source ultimately everybody who holds any amount of cash.  Money conjured from thin air is value stolen from existing currency holders.

No wonder we saw this BTC spike today. Fiat is radioactive and you need to get rid of it as fast as possible and park wealth in anything that will hold it's value.  I got a call today from out of the blue from a finance company offering to lend me money with no credit check.  I wasn't following the news. Now I know why they are getting that desperate.  There are no credit-worthy borrowers left who want to borrow, so they are pushing out to subprime again.  Just like in 2007.  Madness.  




2711. Post 12450762 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on September 17, 2015, 07:06:41 PM
The banks have effectively zero reserves

Uhm, the last time I looked, they had about $2.5 trillion in excess reserves (that is, above and beyond what they are legally required to hold).



Congratulations on taking a snip of a sentence without quoting the whole thing, Genius. I said the banks have effectively zero reserves "If you account for underperforming loans" 
This includes bonds from Greece, Puerto Rico, junk bonds, mortgages on homes with negative equity, etc.

What an asshole.



2712. Post 12451521 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on September 17, 2015, 07:47:33 PM
The banks have effectively zero reserves

Uhm, the last time I looked, they had about $2.5 trillion in excess reserves (that is, above and beyond what they are legally required to hold).



Congratulations on taking a snip of a sentence without quoting the whole thing, Genius. I said the banks have effectively zero reserves "If you account for underperforming loans" 
This includes bonds from Greece, Puerto Rico, junk bonds, mortgages on homes with negative equity, etc.

What an asshole.

Dude, for someone I once mistook as intelligent, you sure post a lot of crap nowadays.  Are you just staying drunk 24/7 nowadays?

You really believe the banks have $2.5T plus required reserves in 'underperforming loans'?  That number is at least as big as the total current M1.

That graph is actually a lot more interesting than you seem to realize, in multiple ways.

Banks have more liabilities than just M1 (checking deposits etc). What about M2? CDs? 

Quote
DEFINITION of 'M2'
A measure of money supply that includes cash and checking deposits (M1) as well as near money. “Near money" in M2 includes savings deposits, money market mutual funds and other time deposits, which are less liquid and not as suitable as exchange mediums but can be quickly converted into cash or checking deposits.

Yes, money market funds. Ask the people with money market funds at Lehman Bros what happens when they break the buck. 

Also, why do you think they suspended mark-to-market accounting?  I think you know damn well almost every investment bank has a prop trading desk where they gamble in the markets.  And it's the bonds that may prove most problematic. Puerto Rico may end up being worse that Greece.



2713. Post 12452288 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on September 17, 2015, 10:52:17 PM
Banks have more liabilities than just M1 (checking deposits etc). What about M2? CDs? 

Quote
DEFINITION of 'M2'
A measure of money supply that includes cash and checking deposits (M1) as well as near money. “Near money" in M2 includes savings deposits, money market mutual funds and other time deposits, which are less liquid and not as suitable as exchange mediums but can be quickly converted into cash or checking deposits.

Yes, money market funds. Ask the people with money market funds at Lehman Bros what happens when they break the buck. 

Also, why do you think they suspended mark-to-market accounting?  I think you know damn well almost every investment bank has a prop trading desk where they gamble in the markets.  And it's the bonds that may prove most problematic. Puerto Rico may end up being worse that Greece.

M1, M2, etc., in no way represent 'liabilities of banks'.  They are measures of how much money (in US dollars) exists.  M1 is all the money that exists in the form of cash and demand accounts, i.e., all the dollars in the world that are immediately spendable.  The other Ms add other money that exists but is not immediately liquid. like bank reserves, savings accounts, CDs, etc.

Your initial claim was basically that banks have 'underperforming loans' that exceed the actual amount of money that even exists.  While I guess this is theoretically possible, it seems to me to be highly unlikely.

In any case, the intent of my initial post was not to defend the solvency of the banks, but rather to bring attention to the unnaturally huge amount of excess reserves held by banks now - especially considering that the level of excess reserves has (naturally) been vanishingly close to zero throughout the history of banking - and maybe get someone to wonder why this has changed, and maybe even wonder what the implications of this change might be.

You really are frustrating.  Every dollar in existence was LENT into existence either by the Fed expanding it's balance sheet to buy bonds or by fractional reserve lending. You know this.  Of course there is more debt than money, because ALL that money has to be paid back at interest.

M2 is almost all liabilities of the  bank, just as M1 is.  I can't even think of an exception to this except M0
which as you know is a tiny fraction of M1.  And who gives a rip what your intentions were? You were responding to MY post and after arguing against a point I never made, you want to change the subject. 

ALL banks have more liabilities than they can meet if they all come due at the same time. That's been known for ages, since I was a kid watching It's a Wonderful Life. What is new is that the loans are massively undercollateralized by markets being propped up artificially. This ranges from mortgages being propped up by the FED buying MBSs to government bonds bought by the Fed from primary dealers days after auction. 

Now you could say "who cares if the loans are undercollaterized as long as the payments are being made?" but that's what I'm getting at. The loans AREN'T being repaid in a growing number of cases ranging from sovereigns (Greece, PR) to payday loans.  You can't see this immediately because of the churn. It's perfectly normal and healthy to refinance at a lower rate, but some are borrowing at HIGHER rates just to make payments on earlier loans at LOWER rates. This is clearly unsustainable.  Honest accounting would show all of those loans as worthless.  The PRIMARY reason for ZIRP is to hide this state of affairs and it's why it can't ever end. 




2714. Post 12452906 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on September 17, 2015, 11:44:42 PM


You made a statement that was demonstrably false - that banks effectively have no reserves now - which is literally the polar opposite of the truth, as they actually have more excess reserves than ever in history. 

Hey Dipshit, WHY do you think their balance sheets show such excess reserves? Interesting, right? curious, right?  Why would they just keep that money lying around doing nothing?  Doesn't make sense, does it?

That's what I've been trying to tell you: IT'S AN ACCOUNTING FRAUD

No sane businessman would let their money sit idle like that if their whole damn business was lending money. 
So why are they doing it? Because that money has already been spent, that's why.  It's already spoken for.  It's to cover their asses when the loans they know are no good have to be written down. But....here's the really scary part:  as much as it is (and it's a shitload, no doubt) it's still not enough. The bad loans are even bigger.

The Fed doesn't really care about "full employment" or "price stability". It is owned by the member banks and does their bidding. If the Fed doesn't pump, the whole damn thing deflates. But there's no patch. No plug for this bad loan hole. All they have is a pump so the hole keeps getting bigger.

The word is "effectively". I'd hoped you were smart enough to know what a qualifier is, but my hope was misplaced.



2715. Post 12453060 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Let's say I have an I.O.U from a hobo for a million dollars. Does that make me a millionaire? Obviously not. Ok, so let's say I have an I.O.U from someone else who works at Burger King for a million dollars, and this burger flipper has an I.O.U. from a hobo also for a million dollars. Does THAT  make me a millionaire? No. But what if I have an I.O.U. for a million bucks from Mr. Monopoly who has $500,000 in cash, two million in debt outstanding and a bunch of I.O.Us from hobos on his asset ledger. Does THAT make me a millionaire? um, what do you think?

So do you call that half a mil that Mr. Monopoly has "excess reserves"??  

I'm using hyperbole here to make a point. Ultimately, the health of the economy is not Wall Street or even the nice end of Main Street. It's some schmoes who work at the factories, refineries and offices with zero equity mortgages, 72 month car loans and a stack of credit cards.  When those guys start to miss payments, the dominoes start falling. It's what happened in 2008. It's what's happening now.  The interest the central banks like the FED pay on reserves is there to keep the lights on and payroll met. It doesn't make them solvent. It doesn't make them profitable. It makes them undead zombies going through the motions.









2716. Post 12453091 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on September 18, 2015, 02:08:41 AM
Let's say I have an I.O.U from a hobo for a million dollars. Does that make me a millionaire? Obviously not. Ok, so let's say I have an I.O.U from someone else who works at Burger King for a million dollars, and this burger flipper has an I.O.U. from a hobo also for a million dollars. Does THAT  make me a millionaire? No. But what if I have an I.O.U. for a million bucks from Mr. Monopoly who has $500,000 in cash, two million in debt outstanding and a bunch of I.O.Us from hobos on his asset ledger. Does THAT make me a millionaire? um, what do you think?

So do you call that half a mil that Mr. Monopoly has "excess reserves"?? 

I'm using hyperbole here to make a point. Ultimately, the health of the economy is not Wall Street or even the nice end of Main Street. It's some schmoes who work at the factories, refineries and offices with zero equity mortgages, 72 month car loans and a stack of credit cards.  When those guys start to miss payments, the dominoes start falling. It's what happened in 2008. It's what's happening now.  The interest the central banks like the FED pay on reserves is It doesn't make them solvent. It doesn't make them profitable. It makes them undead zombies going through the motions.

Not sure if you are addressing me in this post, but if so - ONE MORE TIME: I AM NOT ARGUING THAT THE ECONOMY OR BANKS ARE SOUND.  I just made a statement about banks and reserves, which just happened to involve a correction to something you got wrong.  End of story.

One thing seems certain: at least one of us does have a problem admitting he was wrong.



2717. Post 12453102 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on September 18, 2015, 02:08:41 AM
Let's say I have an I.O.U from a hobo for a million dollars. Does that make me a millionaire? Obviously not. Ok, so let's say I have an I.O.U from someone else who works at Burger King for a million dollars, and this burger flipper has an I.O.U. from a hobo also for a million dollars. Does THAT  make me a millionaire? No. But what if I have an I.O.U. for a million bucks from Mr. Monopoly who has $500,000 in cash, two million in debt outstanding and a bunch of I.O.Us from hobos on his asset ledger. Does THAT make me a millionaire? um, what do you think?

So do you call that half a mil that Mr. Monopoly has "excess reserves"?? 

I'm using hyperbole here to make a point. Ultimately, the health of the economy is not Wall Street or even the nice end of Main Street. It's some schmoes who work at the factories, refineries and offices with zero equity mortgages, 72 month car loans and a stack of credit cards.  When those guys start to miss payments, the dominoes start falling. It's what happened in 2008. It's what's happening now.  The interest the central banks like the FED pay on reserves is It doesn't make them solvent. It doesn't make them profitable. It makes them undead zombies going through the motions.

Not sure if you are addressing me in this post, but if so - ONE MORE TIME: I AM NOT ARGUING THAT THE ECONOMY OR BANKS ARE SOUND.  I just made a statement about banks and reserves, which just happened to involve a correction to something you got wrong.  End of story.

One thing seems certain: at least one of us does have a problem admitting he was wrong.



2718. Post 12453112 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on September 18, 2015, 02:08:41 AM
Let's say I have an I.O.U from a hobo for a million dollars. Does that make me a millionaire? Obviously not. Ok, so let's say I have an I.O.U from someone else who works at Burger King for a million dollars, and this burger flipper has an I.O.U. from a hobo also for a million dollars. Does THAT  make me a millionaire? No. But what if I have an I.O.U. for a million bucks from Mr. Monopoly who has $500,000 in cash, two million in debt outstanding and a bunch of I.O.Us from hobos on his asset ledger. Does THAT make me a millionaire? um, what do you think?

So do you call that half a mil that Mr. Monopoly has "excess reserves"?? 

I'm using hyperbole here to make a point. Ultimately, the health of the economy is not Wall Street or even the nice end of Main Street. It's some schmoes who work at the factories, refineries and offices with zero equity mortgages, 72 month car loans and a stack of credit cards.  When those guys start to miss payments, the dominoes start falling. It's what happened in 2008. It's what's happening now.  The interest the central banks like the FED pay on reserves is It doesn't make them solvent. It doesn't make them profitable. It makes them undead zombies going through the motions.

Not sure if you are addressing me in this post, but if so - ONE MORE TIME: I AM NOT ARGUING THAT THE ECONOMY OR BANKS ARE SOUND.  I just made a statement about banks and reserves, which just happened to involve a correction to something you got wrong.  End of story.

One thing seems certain: at least one of us does have a problem admitting he was wrong.



2719. Post 12454184 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

cui bono? Who benefits from small blocks?  Some one or group of people is stalling the scaling upgrade for reasons other than decentralization, security, etc.  From the videos of the conference, i get the idea that some is pulling strings behind the scenes to manipulate the hold outs. The technical objections seem contrived, like the arguments of a mob lawyer.

Why do the haterz hate so much? Luddites? I don't think so.  I think it's something more cynical than that. I don't think the power behind the small blockers is ideological or technical. It's political.The big blockers didn't seem to grasp that we're up against someone or group that plays dirty.  So who is it? Not the pawns on the chessboard, but the power that's moving the pieces. Who is it? Cui bono?

and that MC was painfully terrible.



2720. Post 12459313 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Elwar on September 18, 2015, 07:34:23 AM
cui bono? Who benefits from small blocks?  Some one or group of people is stalling the scaling upgrade for reasons other than decentralization, security, etc.  From the videos of the conference, i get the idea that some is pulling strings behind the scenes to manipulate the hold outs. The technical objections seem contrived, like the arguments of a mob lawyer.

Why do the haterz hate so much? Luddites? I don't think so.  I think it's something more cynical than that. I don't think the power behind the small blockers is ideological or technical. It's political.The big blockers didn't seem to grasp that we're up against someone or group that plays dirty.  So who is it? Not the pawns on the chessboard, but the power that's moving the pieces. Who is it? Cui bono?

and that MC was painfully terrible.

It was revealed that the Bitcoin XP thing was just a ploy to implement Mike Hearn's blacklisting code. I used to support it until I saw that.

First of all, it's "XT" not XP/
Second of all, the node switch is to allow miners to not deal with slow onion routers if they chose. It's optional.

Thirdly, I didn't even mention XT. I said bigger blocks. Scaling. It doesn't matter as much how they do it so long as they do it soon.

This is what I'm talking about. These bullshit objections that we've answered dozens of times. It's like small blockers WANT Bitcoin to be insignificant and irrelevant. Seven transactions per second tops is insuficient to make bitcoin more than a curiosity. It has to scale



2721. Post 12459433 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on September 18, 2015, 02:14:21 PM
Bitcoin expert on Bloomberg:  Increasing the block size limit will increase the supply of bitcoins and cause the price to fall, by the law of supply and demand.  

Oh, and in matters of bitcoin should trust only the opinion of people with Ph. D.  

Well, I can agree with that part.  Grin

Ok, to play devil's advocate he's sort of right in a way that laymen will misinterpret and not understand. Recall the basic economics equation MV=PQ
basically, money supply (M) multiplied by velocity (V) equals Price of goods (P) times quantity of goods (Q).

Increasing block size means that bitcoin will have the POTENTIAL of greater velocity, which (if M remains constant or growing at a constant rate) means that (assuming quantity of goods remains constant) Price of goods goes up in BTC which means that the value of Bitcoin will fall.

that's a lot of assumptions that I don't think are warranted.  Q will likely go up massively as the utility of the network expands. For example: people will buy blockspace for timestamps, title records, etc.  also microtransactions.




2722. Post 12459738 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):


Quote from: billyjoeallen on September 18, 2015, 06:13:38 PM
if the transactions are throttled, Bitcoin will become less attractive, and hence, cheaper.

on second thought, if Q increases, Velocity increases and M is increasing at a rate of 3600 coins per day, then P also has to increase which would make the value of BTC plummet. Now as you say, this equation really only works in a closed system, so what is the only item that can ONLY be purchased with BTC?  Blockspace. Obviously the cost of blockspace will go down dramatically as supply increases, but that is what will make bitcoin more valuable in dollar terms. increased utility.  If you can buy more blockspace with your BTC, Q increases more or less exactly to the proportion of velocity (V) increasing.  So the equation remains in balance.

So I actually agree with you. Bitcoin buys one thing directly: the ability to write on the block chain. What we are really investing in is shares of the blockchain. As the blockchain size increases, it becomes more valuable in the greater economy, assuming the quality of the information it contains remains constant. That is a pretty big assumption however and I think quality will likely go down a little, but NOT IN PROPORTION to INCREASED SIZE. It costs BTC to spam the network. Spam is prevalent only where it is very cheap or free. There will be spam, but not nearly as much proportionally to (for example) my email inbox.  Factor in certain miners not including dust xactions and spam becomes only a miner (heh) nuisance.

Now miners may gripe that they are bearing a disproportional burden in policing spam, and that's true but only in BTC terms. We the users will pay them more fiat for BTC that can do more writing on the blockchain, so they will actually profit more in fiat terms.  




2723. Post 12470752 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote
Toomim Bros also thinks that 1 MB is way too small, and that the network can and should support larger blocks. We think that one goal for Bitcoin should be minimizing the real cost per transaction. Currently, that cost is supported primarily by the block subsidy, and runs at about 65 kWh per transaction. (300 MW mining network, 1.27 transactions per second.) That's about $4 per transaction. Increasing the transaction volume would not directly require any significant increase in the mining network power consumption, so it would reduce the real cost per transaction.

Any miner will tell you that electricity costs far more than bandwidth.  It's a complete fucking waste to throttle the network when it's so unnecessary.



2724. Post 12478199 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

price goes up when demand exceeds supply, so in order for price to go up, demand for NEW coins must exceed 3600 coins per day.  Just holding won't cut it.  Ultimately speculation of a future increase will not do it either. Their needs to be an increase in UTILITY of bitcoins. 

We think that could best be achieved by raising the transaction limit. By raising the block size.First mover advantage isn't a lock. Look at MySpace. Network effect doesn't mean much when the network isn't scalable. 



2725. Post 12482820 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Norway on September 21, 2015, 01:15:01 PM
Ok guyz!

What should be my target for the oct-jan bull run?

$1800 or $2500?

$3000+ is more realistic. A good solution to scaling will be in place, and the sky will be the limit. Just keeping it real. The current 220-300 range can't go on forever. And I don't think bitcoin will disappear any time soon.

A bad solution to scaling or a can kicking measure is more likely. If we DO get a good solution, them I'm all in again, leveraged.  I just don't see much movement with these core dev morons.  It's more likely the consession to 2 or 4 MB blocks is just there to prevent XT or BIP101 adoption.  They want as little scaling as possible.

The utility of Bitcoin is directly proportional to transaction capacity.  The only thing you can only buy with BTC is blockspace. a bump to a 2 MB limit likely will bring up the price very roughly 100% and 4 MB i expect will roughly cause a 4X jump in spot price.



2726. Post 12487913 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on September 21, 2015, 08:26:31 PM

A wobbly Raspberry Pi?

Can someone explain to me why this isn't the dead end I think it is?

I don't understand it either.

Raspberri pi:  $38
Avalon Nano3 USB Miner: $35
64GB SD card: $20

21 microcomputer: $400???

For everything else, there's MastercardTM



2727. Post 12488087 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on September 22, 2015, 02:40:58 AM

I don't understand it either.

Raspberri pi:  $38
63 GH/s antminer U3: $20
64GB SD card: $20


21 microcomputer: $400???

For everything else, there's MastercardTM

Is this company just an elaborate troll? Srs question Undecided

What's even dumber is that this product is built specifically for developers. Developers know you could build one of these easily for $100- unless this is some miracle terahash chip, that is.



2728. Post 12488366 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on September 22, 2015, 03:28:50 AM

I don't understand it either.

Raspberri pi:  $38
63 GH/s antminer U3: $20
64GB SD card: $20


21 microcomputer: $400???

For everything else, there's MastercardTM

Is this company just an elaborate troll? Srs question Undecided

What's even dumber is that this product is built specifically for developers. Developers know you could build one of these easily for $100- unless this is some miracle terahash chip, that is.

well it comes with 128GB which alone cost ~100$
then the mining chip
and stuff
i guess 400$ is a "fair price"
i mean it's like a fancy Hardware wallet you can program, plus it a full node, plus it to makes some Bitcents constantly.
I don't hate it.
  Adam, you can buy 128 GB sdcards for $20, especially if you buy them in bulk which 21 would do.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=128gb+sd+card&tbs=cat:3387,pdtr0:763301%7C763305,pdtr1:727606%7C128%24128,vw:l,p_ord:p&tbm=shop&spd=5773807439637093095

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=128gb+sd+card&tbs=cat:3387,pdtr0:763301%7C763305,pdtr1:727606%7C128%24128,vw:l,p_ord:p&tbm=shop&spd=14489193896983823315



2729. Post 12488417 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on September 22, 2015, 03:43:53 AM

The mining chip is better than bitmain s5, worse than bitmain s7, but still so tiny as to be pretty inconsequential.

I certainly hope they, (or whomever might buy these things) devise some kind of compelling use case. I sincerely hope that happens. I'm underwhelmed so far... Not even a fancy industrial design vanity case?

All this IoT hype seems less likely to happen vs companies who want to use the blockchain now (and pay fees), cough, fidelity, but can't/won't due to lack of clarity on the move past 2.7tps.  


The business model seems to be to create some sort of premium channel internet, like HBO for the web, complete with cable bill.  Everybody charges for content they get, and gets paid for content they provide.

This part is interesting. From the FAQ:

Quote
Does 21 take a portion of my mined bitcoin?
No, we are not taking a portion of your mined bitcoin. If anything, users who are good participants in the network - by doing things like running full nodes and buying/selling digital goods - will receive much more bitcoin than they would by simply running a mining device alone.

getting paid for running a full node would greatly increase the security and decentralization of the  network.

What is left unsaid is that at the current megawatt power consumption of the network, each transaction costs about $4 unsubsidized, so microtransactions can't be ultimately viable without a block size increase.



2730. Post 12488435 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

The first thing I would do if I got a 21 pc would be to try and hack it to run on a different mining pool. Or no pool if running a full node, kind of like buying a lottery ticket.



2731. Post 12488450 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: RoadStress on September 22, 2015, 04:25:44 AM
So many narrow minds in this topic. Can't you think of anything else than ROI? I understand that this is top priority in everyone's life, but you just can't apply it to EVERYTHING.

Um, yes you can. What are you, a commie?  It doesn't always have to be a financial ROI, but my time, money and effort are either invested or wasted to one degree or another. So is yours.



2732. Post 12488488 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

if 21 is successful in building this premium internet, the blockchain is going to bloat massively. A blockchain transaction for every pageview. Even BIP101 wouldn't keep up.  Perhaps that's why they support BIP100. They want to increase the blocksize limit FASTER with miner voting.  

and the plot thickens...



2733. Post 12488722 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on September 22, 2015, 05:01:23 AM
if 21 is successful in building this premium internet, the blockchain is going to bloat massively. A blockchain transaction for every pageview. Even BIP101 wouldn't keep up.  Perhaps that's why they support BIP100. They want to increase the blocksize limit FASTER with miner voting.  

and the plot thickens...

Premium internet (wth is that)? For a few cents a day? A majority of mining pools want to scale faster than BIP 101?

Why you always make a few good points and then torpedo them with nonsense?  Wink

21 is promoting paying for content directly as opposed to ad-supported content. That is roughly analogous to broadcast TV vs. premium cable.  It's a different business model, but one that can only be done with microtransactions. To continue the metaphor, it would be like paying for cable every time you changed the channel instead of a monthly bill.  Currently, that cost is supported primarily by the block subsidy, and runs at about 65 kWh per transaction. (300 MW mining network, 1.27 transactions per second.) That's about $4 per transaction. Also, at the current 7 TPS (or less) transaction limit,  There couldn't possibly be more than a thousand users of this premium internet before it bogs down and takes our entire network with it.

So the only logical explanation is that 21 plans to dominate mining and vote to increase blocksize faster than BIP101 would do automatically (doubling every two years).



2734. Post 12497490 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Andre# on September 22, 2015, 11:08:49 PM
Nobody here sees the potential of 21 Inc's platform? What Google did for making money with websites (generate revenue with ads), 21 Inc may do for making money with web-services (generate revenue with pay-per-use). I.e. 21 Inc might be the next Google. Guess what that will do for Bitcoin...   Cheesy

I don't see the potential. You don't need special chips or computers to do micro payments. As a charity node, a standard Raspberry Pi 2 is cheaper. And the mining part of it is really lame. To me, it just sounds like a clusterfuck of bitcoin buzzwords. Either the VCs have been fooled, or there is a dimension to this that is still a secret.

Indeed, this HW doesn't do anything that isn't already possible. Just like the first webserver didn't do anything that wasn't already possible (publish some text over the Internet -- you could also just download files instead). But it did make it very easy.

Google turned website into something that you can make money with on a per-use basis. The revenue model of 21 Inc may turn webservices also into something you can make money with on a per-use basis. It may take some time to convince developers to start creating services using their platform/API, but nothing similar exists, yet.

A webserver (Apache) is software, not hardware. I made a micro payment solution for web content via sms payments in 2001. Micropayments is not a new revenue model. Bitcoin can make this happen in a big way. ChangeTip is leading the way right now.

I first wanted to write an elaborate answer. Then I saw this blog.

https://elux.svbtle.com/the-21-inc-computer-is-the-new-altair-8800

I have nothing more to add.

Dudes, this thing keeps looping back on itself. It can't mean devices pay each other on the blockchain. It would be a blizzard of dust transactions that would require GB sized blocks. They have their own micropayments server for that. But if they have their own micropayments server, why use bitcoin at all??




2735. Post 12497580 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

So anyone check out Circle Pay yet?  I updated my app and added a debit card.

It's free banking, so what's the catch?  You can now convert your wallet to fiat with one click. They make it way TOO easy to convert your wallet with one click. If you accidentally click the button, you sell ALL your bitcoins.  If I had millions and wanted to buy at these low prices, I might be tempted to pull such a stunt, except you know, that whole honesty thing. 

But seriously, free banking.  not sooooper cheap. free.  This is their response to Coinbase just outright paying people to get wallets through their referral program.  It's early internet business model:

1. burn money to gain market share
2. Sell out or IPO before you even have to monetize customer base.






2736. Post 12498449 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 23, 2015, 05:03:09 AM
Another interesting development could affect bitcoin dynamics in the coming weeks and months - and that is looming again, a possible US Government shutdown.... 

Many put the odds of a USGOV shutdown at less than 50%; however, if such a US Gov shutdown were to occur (which is really NOT an improbable scenario), there could be some impacts on BTC prices....  in the short and medium term... and I would suggest likely that such an occurrence would cause BTC prices to move in an upwards direction.

meh. I don't think it will have much effect either way.  Worst case scenario is some non essential personnel get sent home for a few days or weeks.  What gets me is...if they are non-essential, then why do they have jobs in the first place? 

Nothing comes close to the block size issue, IMHO.  I think the two issues are similar in that the debt cieling will likely get raised with nothing else getting fixed in a can-kicking maneuver and the block size deadlock will also get kicked with BIP102 after much sound and fury.



2737. Post 12505286 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: aztecminer on September 23, 2015, 02:27:45 PM



did circle get hacked ?? https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/3m2czq/circle_temporarily_pauses_deposits_and_withdrawals/

I don't know, but it's really screwing up my arbitrage.  I sold some coins today and tried to immediately buy them back with Circle, to minimize my exposure to volatility and so I have something to sell. I got an email saying the purchase had failed, so I bought them at Coinbase. The problem is that the coinbase coins are not immediately available, so I have funds tied up and no coins to sell.  the fiat I sent to Circle is not available until this whole thing gets works out, so I have no coins and no money for days, and I am exposed to price volatility the whole time. No income. No access to funds.

Bitcoin price goes up, I can't sell for profit. If it goes down, I can't buy because my fiat is tied up.

And what if the failed purchase does eventually go through? Then I have TWICE as many coins as I intended to buy, and less fiat than I need.

Thanks, Circle.



2738. Post 12523299 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: findftp on September 25, 2015, 10:08:06 AM
I've said it before, and I say it again:
I'd rather have 10 bitcoin bought at 1000 USD, than 1 bitcoin bought at 1 cent. Buy and hold, CCMF!


This remains an interesting mathematical proposition concerning how high BTC is going to go..... and your frame at this point seems to be expecting BTC north of $10k... which well could be the case, in a few years... but a lot of us lose some of that faith with such a prolonged bear market including such a long flat period, too.... and even several apparent false restarts and turn arounds...

Bootstrapping a global currency/comodity takes some time.
You can't expect it to be spread around the world in one week.

I fully agree, better 10 in the red than 1 in the green.

except if you had one in the green you'd have $9,999.99 more fiat than the other guy.



2739. Post 12523560 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Paashaas on September 25, 2015, 01:54:58 PM
The block-size issue is still not fixed, it can go up like now but it will go down hard when media paying attention again to that debat.

If you plan to buy more coins just wait untill that block-size issue starts again.

When it's all over...than the real uprise will start.

+1



2740. Post 12602247 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/decentralist-perspective-bitcoin-might-need-small-blocks-1442090446

These small blockers are really pissing me off. All they care about is mining over TOR. There is no way possible to keep that competitive. Mining for profit is hard but it is downright impossible if nobody wants to buy into your slow-ass network! You won't be able to mine profitably over TOR or ANYWHERE if price goes back to double digits. Fucking morons.

The market wants what the market wants. unless you're a dominatrix, you can't make money by shitting on your customers. There's just too many alternatives.  I'm looking into bitshares.



2741. Post 12620276 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: bambou on October 06, 2015, 09:05:07 PM

Miners revenues are mandatory to ensure the network's security.

While the block reward tends to 0, it is natural for a fee market to emerge, or else there would not be any incentives left for the miners to keep spending the resources that a POW system requires.

Meanwhile, you can enjoy transacting for nearly nothing.

Yeah, that's my thought. A fee market should be allowed to emerge naturally, not artificially by restricting resources.


This is the purpose of the "artificial" restriction: prevent spamming and hence, allowing a fee market to emerge... naturally.

If no restriction in supply (as it also goes with the 21m cap), then there would not be any incentives for miners to pursue their amazing stacking of hashpower... which in the end ensures the system security.


You have it backwards. As fees go up, the usefulness of the network goes down.  There is less of a competitive advantage over competing networks.  The fee market can ONLY naturally emerge in the absence of an artificial restriction on capacity.  The NATURAL restriction lies at the intersection of block propagation time (which would limit blocksize without a cap) and fees for larger blocks (more xactions=more fees) along with a certain head start in mining the next block.




2742. Post 12620425 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: bambou on October 06, 2015, 08:43:53 PM


Miners revenues are mandatory to ensure the network's security.

While the block reward tends to 0, it is natural for a fee market to emerge, or else there would not be any incentives left for the miners to keep spending the resources that a POW system requires.

Meanwhile, you can enjoy transacting for nearly nothing.

It is possible to have too much security.  Would you hire an army to guard a child's piggy bank? The compensation for miners should be proportional to the security they actually provide.  It costs almost a million dollars/day to secure a network with a 3-4 Billion dollar market cap.  How much do you think the New York Fed spends guarding their gold vaults under 33 Liberty ST. ? I would be very surprised if it was anywhere close to 1 million/day.  

If miners can provide 90% as much security for 10% of the current cost/transaction, that is a increase in value to network users.  If they keep stonewalling any blocksize increase, they risk losing market share to competing altcoins.  

I'm not selling my BTC, but i'm not reinvesting my arbitrage profits either. I'm using them to buy bitshares.

If small blockers were truly committed to decentralization, they wouldn't be limiting Bitcoin's utility.  A settlement network between trusted third parties is absolutely not what Satoshi or any of us early adopters had in mind.  It's supposed to be a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. It always was.



2743. Post 12620738 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: bambou on October 06, 2015, 10:39:39 PM


Miners revenues are mandatory to ensure the network's security.

While the block reward tends to 0, it is natural for a fee market to emerge, or else there would not be any incentives left for the miners to keep spending the resources that a POW system requires.

Meanwhile, you can enjoy transacting for nearly nothing.

It is possible to have too much security.  Would you hire an army to guard a child's piggy bank? The compensation for miners should be proportional to the security they actually provide.  It costs almost a million dollars/day to secure a network with a 3-4 Billion dollar market cap.  How much do you think the New York Fed spends guarding their gold vaults under 33 Liberty ST. ? I would be very surprised if it was anywhere close to 1 million/day.  

If miners can provide 90% as much security for 10% of the current cost/transaction, that is a increase in value to network users.  If they keep stonewalling any blocksize increase, they risk losing market share to competing altcoins.  

I'm not selling my BTC, but i'm not reinvesting my arbitrage profits either. I'm using them to buy bitshares.

If small blockers were truly committed to decentralization, they wouldn't be limiting Bitcoin's utility.  A settlement network between trusted third parties is absolutely not what Satoshi or any of us early adopters had in mind.  It's supposed to be a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. It always was.


So the caping is preventing utility? Or "mass adoption" maybe?

What is actually forcing miners to spend millions to secure a system that should not be as powerful?

Seriously, you need to take a deep breath.

Yes, capping is preventing utility and impeding mass adoption.  7 transactions/sec cannot support mass adoption.  Nobody is FORCING miners to spend millions. They-- like any investors--are expecting a ROI on sunk capital.  Miners are employees of the network. Hodlers are the owners.  

The thing you got most wrong is that Bitcoin is NOT powerful. It's a network with a 7 TPS capacity. It is a very SECURE network with relatively little power.  We could octuple the power with BIP101 at a relatively low cost to security.  If we don't, we will lose market share. It's as simple as that.



2744. Post 12621496 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):


Quote from: poeEDgar on October 06, 2015, 06:46:10 PM


Bigger blocks would require a good deal of adoption, which has yet to happen. Whether you want the limit raised or not. Cheesy


That's a circular argument.  Lots of people are reluctant to adopt a technology that isn't scalable.  In't isn't exactly the Field of dreams. If you build it, they may not come BUT if you DON'T build it, they certainly won't.



2745. Post 12624590 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: Elwar on October 07, 2015, 07:36:25 AM
That's a circular argument.  Lots of people are reluctant to adopt a technology that isn't scalable.  In't isn't exactly the Field of dreams. If you build it, they may not come BUT if you DON'T build it, they certainly won't.

This.

I was talking to the owner of the bar I was at the other day and was explaining Bitcoin to the owner. I almost had him convinced to start accepting bitcoins for payment when he stopped and was like "wait a minute, what are the block size parameters and transactions per second?". Needless to say he was displeased that in 2 years the code would need to be changed if current transaction volume continued to increase at the current rate. He then started asking me about alt coins like Doge. He decided to start accepting Doge instead because he thought it had a funny picture with the dog and he was like "you has doges?".

A SNARK IS NOT AN ARGUMENT. THE PEOPLE WHO BUILT SOFTWARE INFRASTRUCTURE ARE NOT GOING TO LAYER ON TOP OF A NON-SCALABLE BLOCKCHAIN. It's too much work for too little reward. The people who finance the infrastructure are not going to pay for it. Speculators like me are not going to invest when the expected future returns are based on the utility of only a settlement network.

We don't have two years. Bitshares 2.0 is going to launch literally in a week. Altcoins can take all your good code and build a chain on top of it now. Many have and a billion-dollars to launch a real competitor is chump change for Silicone Valley or Wall Street. I understand you want an armored truck and not a sports car, but even a Brinks truck has to keep up with traffic. If you want Bitcoin to be the MySpace of crypto, keep doing what you're doing.



2746. Post 12626833 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Rough Consensus Attack:

Quote
Now, let's assume the attacker is pissed at this.  And takes it's
attitudinal inspiration from Hollywood, or other enlightened sources
like NYT on how to retaliate in cyberwar (OPM, anyone?) to say, it decides to fight back.  Game on.

How to fight back seems easy to say:  Stop the group from launching its
protocol.  How?

It turns out that there is a really nice attack.  If the group has a
protocol in mind, then all the attacker has to do is:

   a) suggest a new alternate protocol.
   b) balance the group so that there is disagreement, roughly evenly
balanced between the original and the challenger.

Suggesting an alternate is really easy - as we know there are dozens of
prototypes out there, just gotta pick one that's sufficiently different.
  In this case I can think of 3 others without trying, and 6 people on
this group could design 1 in a month.

Balancing the group is just a matter of phone calls and resources.  Call
in favours.  So many people out there who would love to pop in and utter
an opinion.  So many friends of friends, willing to strut their stuff.



Because of the rules of rough consensus, if a rough balance is
preserved, then it stops all forward movement.  This is a beautiful
attack.  If the original side gets disgusted and walks, the attacker can
simply come up with a new challenger.  If the original team quietens
down, the challenger can quieten down too - it doesn't want to win, it
wants to preserve the conflict.

The attack can't even be called, because all contributors are doing is
uttering an opinion as they would if asked.  The attack simply uses the
time-tested rules which the project is convinced are the only way to do
these things.



The only defence I can see is to drop rough consensus.  By offering
rough consensus, it's almost a gilt-edged invitation to the attacker.
The attacker isn't so stupid as to not use it.

http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-August/026151.html

I am convinced this deadlock on blocksize is intentional. What I don't know is who is behind it or why.




2747. Post 12655546 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on October 10, 2015, 07:14:20 PM
Here is some more info for you guys. I am sure this will positively effect the BTC price! Will only make us stronger!

www.openledger.info

COUNTDOWN:
www.bitshares.org


How? Are they using the bitcoin network in any way?

No, they have their own pr00f-of-stake blockchain, but you can create any kind of digital asset you want, so it's only a matter of time until they have a tradable BTSBTC asset that tracks bitcoin price, assuming nobody's done it already. Then you get 1000 transactions per second trading of bitcoin (derivative), while still having full control of your private keys.  Seems too good to be true, so I'm looking into any potential flaws. haven't found anything substantial yet.

You even get paid interest on some of the assets.  This is derivatives. Its orders of magnitude bigger than money.  Mortgage-back-securities, credit default swaps, cattle futures, insurance contracts, football bets, anything. It could disrupt a market fifty times bigger than Gross World Product.  And if it doesn't, Etherium or other implementations will. 

I think future historians will divide history into the pre-blockchain epochs and post blockchain. It's that big.
Trading bot developer may be a six figure career in the near future.




2748. Post 12675409 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on October 13, 2015, 12:13:24 PM
sidechains is a reality and will generate demand for btc to back smooth exchange of many other assets.

If the Liquid announcement causes this rally before even launching, it should be an indication of how much transaction limits are holding us back. Imagine how high we'd go if we had real scalability.



2749. Post 12675434 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Bitshares 2.0 launches in 17 minutes. could b related.



2750. Post 12680153 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: gentlemand on October 13, 2015, 08:33:00 PM

So what if he/they make a decision sometime late 2016/early 2017, and it turns out to be the "wrong" one? Will they spend three years to change that as well?


If it can't offer enough people usability then other systems will and it'll die. It's a trillion miles away from being 'too big to fail'. I can see why they'd grind to a halt but it doesn't exist in a vacuum and the world is a fast moving place that don't give a shit about Bitcoin's nobility.

+1

We are being played against each other.  Rough consensus attack:


http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-August/026151.html


Quote
It turns out that there is a really nice attack.  If the group has a
protocol in mind, then all the attacker has to do is:

   a) suggest a new alternate protocol.
   b) balance the group so that there is disagreement, roughly evenly
balanced between the original and the challenger.

Suggesting an alternate is really easy - as we know there are dozens of
prototypes out there, just gotta pick one that's sufficiently different.
  In this case I can think of 3 others without trying, and 6 people on
this group could design 1 in a month.

Balancing the group is just a matter of phone calls and resources.  Call
in favours.  So many people out there who would love to pop in and utter
an opinion.  So many friends of friends, willing to strut their stuff.



Because of the rules of rough consensus, if a rough balance is
preserved, then it stops all forward movement.  This is a beautiful
attack.  If the original side gets disgusted and walks, the attacker can
simply come up with a new challenger.  If the original team quietens
down, the challenger can quieten down too - it doesn't want to win, it
wants to preserve the conflict.

The attack can't even be called, because all contributors are doing is
uttering an opinion as they would if asked.  The attack simply uses the
time-tested rules which the project is convinced are the only way to do
these things.



The only defence I can see is to drop rough consensus.  By offering
rough consensus, it's almost a gilt-edged invitation to the attacker.
The attacker isn't so stupid as to not use it.

Can anyone suggest a way to get around this?  I think this really puts a
marker on the map - you simply can't do a security/crypto protocol under
rough consensus in open committee, when there is an attacker out there
willing to put in the resources to stop it.

Thoughts?



2751. Post 12680306 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on October 13, 2015, 11:09:15 PM

So what if he/they make a decision sometime late 2016/early 2017, and it turns out to be the "wrong" one? Will they spend three years to change that as well?


If it can't offer enough people usability then other systems will and it'll die. It's a trillion miles away from being 'too big to fail'. I can see why they'd grind to a halt but it doesn't exist in a vacuum and the world is a fast moving place that don't give a shit about Bitcoin's nobility.

+1

We are being played against each other.  Rough consensus attack:


http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-August/026151.html


Quote
It turns out that there is a really nice attack.  If the group has a
protocol in mind, then all the attacker has to do is:

   a) suggest a new alternate protocol.
   b) balance the group so that there is disagreement, roughly evenly
balanced between the original and the challenger.

Suggesting an alternate is really easy - as we know there are dozens of
prototypes out there, just gotta pick one that's sufficiently different.
  In this case I can think of 3 others without trying, and 6 people on
this group could design 1 in a month.

Balancing the group is just a matter of phone calls and resources.  Call
in favours.  So many people out there who would love to pop in and utter
an opinion.  So many friends of friends, willing to strut their stuff.



Because of the rules of rough consensus, if a rough balance is
preserved, then it stops all forward movement.  This is a beautiful
attack.  If the original side gets disgusted and walks, the attacker can
simply come up with a new challenger.  If the original team quietens
down, the challenger can quieten down too - it doesn't want to win, it
wants to preserve the conflict.

The attack can't even be called, because all contributors are doing is
uttering an opinion as they would if asked.  The attack simply uses the
time-tested rules which the project is convinced are the only way to do
these things.



The only defence I can see is to drop rough consensus.  By offering
rough consensus, it's almost a gilt-edged invitation to the attacker.
The attacker isn't so stupid as to not use it.

Can anyone suggest a way to get around this?  I think this really puts a
marker on the map - you simply can't do a security/crypto protocol under
rough consensus in open committee, when there is an attacker out there
willing to put in the resources to stop it.

Thoughts?

Hey BJA. Didn't you mean to say Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares Bitshares ??

I only own about $2 worth of bitshares, but I'm keeping an eye on it. I know how annoying altcoin pushers are, so i'm sorry if that's what I'm doing. I thought it was tangentially related.



2752. Post 12690049 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

We haven't had a $10 retracement since Sept. 22. if this pump goes on much longer, I'm gonna have to take some profits.  5 green candles in a row on the weekly and 3 day charts. starting to look overbought.



2753. Post 12703395 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

w00t! 50 coins sold in the $260s. A parabolic raise is totally sustainable over a weekend....NOT! don't worry boys and girls. I still have PLENTY left to dump on your heads if you wanna really test $270. 



2754. Post 12703600 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: becoin on October 16, 2015, 04:56:06 PM
w00t! 50 coins sold in the $260s. A parabolic raise is totally sustainable over a weekend....NOT! don't worry boys and girls. I still have PLENTY left to dump on your heads if you wanna really test $270. 
You have dumped plenty on our heads at $250. Thank you very much. Keep the good work!

No I didn't! I had ONE sell order @ $259.22 but I pulled it yesterday before it tripped. 



2755. Post 12703903 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: becoin on October 16, 2015, 05:35:53 PM
w00t! 50 coins sold in the $260s. A parabolic raise is totally sustainable over a weekend....NOT! don't worry boys and girls. I still have PLENTY left to dump on your heads if you wanna really test $270. 
You have dumped plenty on our heads at $250. Thank you very much. Keep the good work!

No I didn't! I had ONE sell order @ $259.22 but I pulled it yesterday before it tripped. 
Ah, I see. So, you'll pull your sell order at $269 before it trips as well.

Nope! just sold five more. C'mon, you pussies. go for $270. I dare you.



2756. Post 12704301 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Dilla on October 16, 2015, 06:15:16 PM
No one is selling. Are we going to se a full retrace to $310?


confirmed

confirmation verified

verification confirmed

confirmed verification confirmation

verified.



2757. Post 12704780 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: ImI on October 16, 2015, 06:42:54 PM

gemini volume is such a joke....

Just sold everything I had there. all 0.2 BTC worth.



2758. Post 12705827 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

green candles seven out of the last eight days.
green candles seven out of the last eight weeks.
Upward momentum or overbought?
Time will tell.

One thing's for sure: I'm making a heluva lot more profit lending out my new fiat than my old BTC.  




2759. Post 12706683 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: E on October 17, 2015, 01:11:06 AM
green candles seven out of the last three weeks.

http://digitalpolyphony.webs.com/normal_PDVD_125.jpg

Whoa, three aces!
Shit. Fixed. But you gotta admit seven out of eight days and weeks is extremely rare occurrence. Even bitcoin doesn't go straight up forever. 



2760. Post 12706963 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

crazy ass shit.I got a sell order @ $267.5 at BFX and it's been hovering around 276.49 for 15 minutes.



2761. Post 12706999 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 17, 2015, 03:14:42 AM
I read something about a vast Russian MMM ponzi currently operating in South Africa buying up Bitcoins. Any news?

Quote
Bobby Lee, CEO of Chinese exchange BTCC, told CoinDesk his platform has seen a significant volume increase, though he dismissed much of his competitors' volume as "artificial".

Those behind the volume, he said, are not traders but consumers sucked into a Russian ponzi scheme, MMM.

"We have posted warnings on our site and on our social media to warn users to be careful, but they have been coming to our exchange and buying out like crazy," he said, adding:

    "This time it's not speculative trading but based on them getting sucked into this ecosystem."

https://twitter.com/YourBTCC/status/654273706013798401?lang=en

"South Africa" must include a many of the poorest and least educated people there.

Ah, bitcoin -- bringing First World financial ruin to the unbanked in the Third World...

May you all go broke, and burn in hell...

Spare me your sanctimony, Professor.  I suppose your paternalistic concern for those lost souls means you would restrict their actions by force if necessary to save them from decisions you consider unwise.  Freedom means the freedom to do things that are stupid.  It's their money. It's their lives. It's their business.  I hope they get so rich they buy your house when Brazil goes on the auction block.



2762. Post 12707005 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 17, 2015, 03:19:10 AM
crazy ass shit.I got a sell order @ $267.5 at BFX and it's been hovering around 276.49 for 15 minutes.

On how many exchanges do you trade?

Just BFX with any volume. I also have coinbase, circle and gemini accounts. 



2763. Post 12707033 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

WAIT! Come back! It was only 0.1646 coins @ 267.5  I was almost out of ammo, I swear.  Just buy a few more coins and you'll get that short squeeze. 

One fucking penny. FML. 



2764. Post 12707054 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 17, 2015, 03:30:31 AM
crazy ass shit.I got a sell order @ $267.5 at BFX and it's been hovering around 276.49 for 15 minutes.

On how many exchanges do you trade?

Just BFX with any volume. I also have coinbase, circle and gemini accounts. 

Do you actually wire fiat to BFX? 

I mean personally I am a little leary of BFX especially after some of its most recent shenanigans... but I hear that they do have several of various shorting.. etc trading instruments.

Fuck no. Wire fiat to Honk Kong? No i send BTC there, either sell it and buy back lower or lend it out at interest. If I have any fiat there, i lend it out until I want to buy BTC with it.  If I want to withdraw, I buy BTC and sell it via bitquick or purse.io  Never buy retail. never sell wholesale. 



2765. Post 12707127 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

$267.49 again. You gotta be fuckin kidding me. Bulls so scared of a 14 coin "wall"??




2766. Post 12707142 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: snakey on October 17, 2015, 03:55:50 AM
where can I buy instant BTC?

without a verified account, you're SOL.  Your only bet with banks closed is LocalBitcoins and be prepared to pay a hefty premium.  You can buy me a gift card on purse.io with a credit card, but again, you'll pay ~ 20-25% over spot.  You gotta plan ahead for these things.



2767. Post 12707223 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: chennan on October 17, 2015, 04:06:42 AM
where can I buy instant BTC?

without a verified account, you're SOL.  Your only bet with banks closed is LocalBitcoins and be prepared to pay a hefty premium.  You can buy me a gift card on purse.io with a credit card, but again, you'll pay ~ 20-25% over spot.  You gotta plan ahead for these things.

Well, I mean technically you can buy instant BTC with coinbase.. but you have to link your credit card to your account, incase if the payments don't go through from your bank account, it will just automatically charge your credit card... Visa and mastercards are only accepted.

But anyways, I've never really looked at purse.io ... I know I should, but I'm lazy. What kind of gift cards are you looking for?

It takes days to set up a coinbase account. they send you 2 microdeposits to your bank account and you have to tell them how much it is so they are sure it's the right account. it's ACH (in the USA) so it takes 3-4 business days.  I can buy instantly there up to a limit by linking a credit card to my VERIFIED account.

To answer your question, I buy gamestop gift cards that I use to buy shell gift cards that I use to buy gas.

I just thought of something. You can buy instantly if you are near a BTM.

http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-atm-map/



2768. Post 12707238 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on October 17, 2015, 04:18:13 AM
$267.49 again. You gotta be fuckin kidding me. Bulls so scared of a 14 coin "wall"??



Filled, u happy now?

YES!! Next stop $270. Maybe I should quit using round numbers.



2769. Post 12707289 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: chennan on October 17, 2015, 04:27:55 AM
where can I buy instant BTC?

without a verified account, you're SOL.  Your only bet with banks closed is LocalBitcoins and be prepared to pay a hefty premium.  You can buy me a gift card on purse.io with a credit card, but again, you'll pay ~ 20-25% over spot.  You gotta plan ahead for these things.

Well, I mean technically you can buy instant BTC with coinbase.. but you have to link your credit card to your account, incase if the payments don't go through from your bank account, it will just automatically charge your credit card... Visa and mastercards are only accepted.

But anyways, I've never really looked at purse.io ... I know I should, but I'm lazy. What kind of gift cards are you looking for?

It takes days to set up a coinbase account. they send you 2 microdeposits to your bank account and you have to tell them how much it is so they are sure it's the right account. it's ACH (in the USA) so it takes 3-4 business days.  I can buy instantly there up to a limit by linking a credit card to my VERIFIED account.

To answer your question, I buy gamestop gift cards that I use to buy shell gift cards that I use to buy gas.

I just thought of something. You can buy instantly if you are near a BTM.

http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-atm-map/

Any market in Dick's Sporting Goods gift cards?  I know this isn't the marketplace subforum, but I got tired of trying sell it on there. If you'd like to buy it, send me a PM.

And man I wish there was a Bitcoin ATM near my place... that would be so convenient, but next place I move too it will be sort of within driving distance... so good I guess for convenience, bad for me that I won't be moving there till about 4 or 5 more months and the bull spike will probably simmer down by then.

Actually I think this pre-auction (US Marshals) rally is a bulltrap and  four or five months from now, either BIP100, BIP 101 or some other scaling solution will be implemented. Halving will be more immanent and it will be an excellent time to buy.



2770. Post 12707340 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: chennan on October 17, 2015, 04:36:02 AM

Actually I think this pre-auction (US Marshals) rally is a bulltrap and  four or five months from now, either BIP100, BIP 101 or some other scaling solution will be implemented. Halving will be more immanent and it will be an excellent time to buy.

Yeah, that could be possible... but for some reason, I just see that people is stocking up right now on relatively cheap coins that they would hold until the halving.  I just see this as a buy it now, or regret it later kind of thing; not necessarily a bull trap.  I can see my self having to put ~$500 in 4-5 months to get a full bitcoin, and when I move I'll be thinking back to this and wishing "damn I wish I was here 4-5 months ago".

That's entirely possible.



2771. Post 12707384 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on October 17, 2015, 04:53:58 AM
Refreshing to see the bitfinex order book look normal again.

If you mean margin longs closing, then yeah. It's a good sign. 

$270!!



2772. Post 12707528 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on October 17, 2015, 05:16:26 AM
Willy is that you?  Grin

Btw. How quick are actually deposits on Chinese exchanges? I believe it is also impossible to get money there during the weekends...

Yeah, the Saturday night discount is going to be enormous. It might go all the way down to $290  Tongue



2773. Post 12708735 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: dre1982 on October 17, 2015, 08:22:04 AM
$270 incoming. Exiting last week's. Where will this stop ??


Pretty sure it already stopped unless there's a double top. Five weeks is a good run, but bitcoin needs to take a breather before resuming the climb.

of course I've been wrong before.



2774. Post 12708998 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on October 17, 2015, 09:55:41 AM
Double top with lower high? Small short here?  Cheesy
Don't thinks so. the second top has to have higher volume than the first.



2775. Post 12714556 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

I think 250MW is underestimating the power demands of the network.  Bitfury's new datacenter is going to be 100 MW by itself.  Most miners are using 27nm ASICS or worse with some people still actually using GPUs for wha,t I don't know, nostalgia? 

300MW is a conservative estimate and quite possibly higher.  This is why I think it's silly to hold up the block size increase because it's going to make it difficult to mine over TOR.  It's damn near impossible to mine profitably now--over TOR or otherwise-- considering energy costs, hardware costs, bandwidth costs, etc. Any operation with the economy of scale large enough to mine profitably will be extremely difficult to hide from the tax man or other gov. agents. SO WHY BOTHER USING TOR?

Bitcoin is going legit. It has to, because that's how we'll get the money to finance the next weapon against "the Man".  Sell out to Wall Street and start over with something less traceable while being more private and secure.



2776. Post 12714622 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 17, 2015, 09:21:48 PM


KnC seems to be "selling" some of their mined coins in the form of the XBT Tracker One Electronically Traded Notes.  Those are issued through NASDAQ Sweden by a company somehow connected to them.   As I understand it, KnC keeps the bitcoins and sell IOUs that promise to pay the holder whatever the current BTC price will be at the time.  


Throughout history, every time someone keeps the assets and trades warehouse receipts for that asset (I.O.Us), the IOUs multiply faster that the assets that back them up. It's Why Nixon was forced to abandon the Gold Standard in 1972.  It's why Gox closed.

But before that happens, the I.O.U.s have the effect of increasing the apparent money supply, leading to lower purchasing power per unit currency.  Inflation. 



2777. Post 12714686 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Successful mining requires a specialized skill set. Successful trading requires a completely different specialized skill set.  Very few people are gifted to possess both. enough. In general, even successful miners lose some profit trading and some of the best traders lose money mining. 

Miners will sell too many coins at low prices and too few at high prices. That's we we have such high volatility. Successful traders buy low and sell high, reducing volatility, but traders don't get the coins first. Miners do.



2778. Post 12714787 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on October 17, 2015, 10:00:51 PM
Successful mining requires a specialized skill set. Successful trading requires a completely different specialized skill set.  Very few people are gifted to possess both. enough. In general, even successful miners lose some profit trading and some of the best traders lose money mining. 

Miners will sell too many coins at low prices and too few at high prices. That's we we have such high volatility. Successful traders buy low and sell high, reducing volatility, but traders don't get the coins first. Miners do.

bumping myself. I think this bears repeating.

Possible head and shoulders forming, but I don't think I'm going to trade it. I already sold all the coins I'm comfortable selling in this range.



2779. Post 12722459 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: hdbuck on October 18, 2015, 07:12:23 PM
so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.


Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.


no, that was not the same account. the one satoshi used on this matter seems legit as far as the story goes.

in any case, nobody knows, so let cut the hacker crap and focus on the message rather than the messenger, as i personally found it well written and quite insightful.

It was fucking bullshit. The language and syntax were completely different from anything we know Satoshi wrote.  The argument was bogus too.  The blocksize limit does not improve security. It does not stop spam. It makes the network less vulnerable to one type of spam and more vulnerable to another type.  The other argument was equally bad. Core devs are not gods. Consensus is not only not always possible. It's not always even desirable.

It should be clear by now that we are the victims of a Rough Consensus Attack.  Satoshi designed an electronic cash system, not some bulletproof digital settlement system.  Bitcoin cannot give power to the people if it is inaccessible to the people.  Security is an important feature, but so is usability. If it doesn't scale, then it can't remain distributed and decentralized.  We can't take on the banks with a network that is only useful to banks. These are disingenuous arguments used by people arguing in bad faith. 



2780. Post 12724376 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

I'm not pushing XT specifically. Not even Gavin and Hearn are doing that. Sure, I would prefer BIP101 to BIP100,  but it's not even clear that we'll get ANY scaling solution and certain people are being manipulated by powers that don't want any scaling solution to be implemented.  

What is clear is that the argument that small block size prevents centralization is a bogus argument.  Routing around the xaction limit reintroduces trusted third parties.  These smallblockers are not defending the true decentralized vision of the project. Just the opposite is the case.  They want to take power away from the end users (the customers) and give it to the employees (the miners). Whether or not the owners (hodlers) like that idea is going to be reflected in the charts.



2781. Post 12724468 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 19, 2015, 02:42:45 AM
I'm not pushing XT specifically. Not even Gavin and Hearn are doing that. Sure, I would prefer BIP101 to BIP100,  but it's not even clear that we'll get ANY scaling solution and certain people are being manipulated by powers that don't want any scaling solution to be implemented.  

What is clear is that the argument that small block size prevents centralization is a bogus argument.  Routing around the xaction limit reintroduces trusted third parties.  These smallblockers are not defending the true decentralized vision of the project. Just the opposite is the case.  They want to take power away from the end users (the customers) and give it to the employees (the miners). Whether or not the owners (hodlers) like that idea is going to be reflected in the charts.

Let's leave it to people who understand Bitcoin to discuss these issues, shall we?

How's that supposed to work? How many "blockspace" do I get for 1 bitcoin?

Easy. 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain.  I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?

So for 1 bitcoin I get 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain? Are you for real? Were you hit over the head with something?
Nope. I get one twentyone millionth of the whole damn chain. 4 eva. If you think that's too much, then perhaps you are selling your coins too cheaply.

If I'm not buying blockspace when I'm buying bitcoin, then what the hell am I buying?

As many times as you've quoted me, you've never refuted my argument.  You know damn well I wasn't being literal, as I've repeated many times. But yes, the hodlers are the owners as the bitshares network make more clear by having a less confusing name for the trading tokens. 

How many coins you got, Fucktard? Are you an owner or a miner employee?  Who do you think buys those coins if not people like me? Who do you think is going to use a hobby network with a 7 TPS capacity when the transaction costs (currently around $4) go unsubsidized? Hell, even ACH is cheaper than that.



2782. Post 12724524 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 19, 2015, 03:10:16 AM
I'm not pushing XT specifically. Not even Gavin and Hearn are doing that. Sure, I would prefer BIP101 to BIP100,  but it's not even clear that we'll get ANY scaling solution and certain people are being manipulated by powers that don't want any scaling solution to be implemented.  

What is clear is that the argument that small block size prevents centralization is a bogus argument.  Routing around the xaction limit reintroduces trusted third parties.  These smallblockers are not defending the true decentralized vision of the project. Just the opposite is the case.  They want to take power away from the end users (the customers) and give it to the employees (the miners). Whether or not the owners (hodlers) like that idea is going to be reflected in the charts.

Let's leave it to people who understand Bitcoin to discuss these issues, shall we?

How's that supposed to work? How many "blockspace" do I get for 1 bitcoin?

Easy. 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain.  I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?

So for 1 bitcoin I get 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain? Are you for real? Were you hit over the head with something?
Nope. I get one twentyone millionth of the whole damn chain. 4 eva. If you think that's too much, then perhaps you are selling your coins too cheaply.

If I'm not buying blockspace when I'm buying bitcoin, then what the hell am I buying?

As many times as you've quoted me, you've never refuted my argument.  You know damn well I wasn't being literal, as I've repeated many times. But yes, the hodlers are the owners as the bitshares network make more clear by having a less confusing name for the trading tokens.  

How many coins you got, Fucktard? Are you an owner or a miner employee?  Who do you think buys those coins if not people like me? Who do you think is going to use a hobby network with a 7 TPS capacity when the transaction costs (currently around $4) go unsubsidized? Hell, even ACH is cheaper than that.

What argument, this one ?

I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?

 Cheesy

There will be a gang of persons willing to pay  5$, 10$, hell 50$ for true monetary sovereignty.

These people are presently paying orders of magnitude more to move their money around the world unnoticed.

So that's your answer? criminals? A network that is useful only to criminals will get isolated. the on-ramps and off-ramps are vulnerable.  I'm an anarcho-capitalist, so I could give a fuck if bitcoin is used to buy drugs or launder money, but I also have to live in the real world where the State takes a dim view of such things and has the means to discourage them. There is safety in numbers and a small network makes the users more of a target than a large one with lots of "legitimate" clients. Ever think about that?



2783. Post 12724576 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 19, 2015, 03:24:14 AM
I'm not pushing XT specifically. Not even Gavin and Hearn are doing that. Sure, I would prefer BIP101 to BIP100,  but it's not even clear that we'll get ANY scaling solution and certain people are being manipulated by powers that don't want any scaling solution to be implemented.  

What is clear is that the argument that small block size prevents centralization is a bogus argument.  Routing around the xaction limit reintroduces trusted third parties.  These smallblockers are not defending the true decentralized vision of the project. Just the opposite is the case.  They want to take power away from the end users (the customers) and give it to the employees (the miners). Whether or not the owners (hodlers) like that idea is going to be reflected in the charts.

Let's leave it to people who understand Bitcoin to discuss these issues, shall we?

How's that supposed to work? How many "blockspace" do I get for 1 bitcoin?

Easy. 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain.  I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?

So for 1 bitcoin I get 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain? Are you for real? Were you hit over the head with something?
Nope. I get one twentyone millionth of the whole damn chain. 4 eva. If you think that's too much, then perhaps you are selling your coins too cheaply.

If I'm not buying blockspace when I'm buying bitcoin, then what the hell am I buying?

As many times as you've quoted me, you've never refuted my argument.  You know damn well I wasn't being literal, as I've repeated many times. But yes, the hodlers are the owners as the bitshares network make more clear by having a less confusing name for the trading tokens.  

How many coins you got, Fucktard? Are you an owner or a miner employee?  Who do you think buys those coins if not people like me? Who do you think is going to use a hobby network with a 7 TPS capacity when the transaction costs (currently around $4) go unsubsidized? Hell, even ACH is cheaper than that.

What argument, this one ?

I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?

 Cheesy

There will be a gang of persons willing to pay  5$, 10$, hell 50$ for true monetary sovereignty.

These people are presently paying orders of magnitude more to move their money around the world unnoticed.

So that's your answer? criminals? A network that is useful only to criminals will get isolated. the on-ramps and off-ramps are vulnerable.  I'm an anarcho-capitalist, so I could give a fuck if bitcoin is used to buy drugs or launder money, but I also have to live in the real world where the State takes a dim view of such things and has the means to discourage them. There is safety in numbers and a small network makes the users more of a target than a large one with lots of "legitimate" clients. Ever think about that?

Criminals ?

Sure if that's your word for individuals interested in keeping their wealth of out of touch from nation states and their bullies we can call them that.

Let me guess, your idea of "legitimate" clients is the typical pay check to pay check person interested in shopping with BTC at their local supermarket?

It's not MY idea of "legitimate" that is relevant. That's why I used quote marks. You didn't really respond to my argument. I had the same problem with the Seasteaders.  a successful floating anarchotopia would not withstand a  Mark 48 torpedo after the media reported that some floating prostitutes, druggies and gamblers were laundering money for terrorists. You can't beat these assholes playing by their rules. You need human shields. You need the damn Walmart shoppers.



2784. Post 12724629 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 19, 2015, 03:39:19 AM
I'm not pushing XT specifically. Not even Gavin and Hearn are doing that. Sure, I would prefer BIP101 to BIP100,  but it's not even clear that we'll get ANY scaling solution and certain people are being manipulated by powers that don't want any scaling solution to be implemented.  

What is clear is that the argument that small block size prevents centralization is a bogus argument.  Routing around the xaction limit reintroduces trusted third parties.  These smallblockers are not defending the true decentralized vision of the project. Just the opposite is the case.  They want to take power away from the end users (the customers) and give it to the employees (the miners). Whether or not the owners (hodlers) like that idea is going to be reflected in the charts.

Let's leave it to people who understand Bitcoin to discuss these issues, shall we?

How's that supposed to work? How many "blockspace" do I get for 1 bitcoin?

Easy. 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain.  I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?

So for 1 bitcoin I get 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain? Are you for real? Were you hit over the head with something?
Nope. I get one twentyone millionth of the whole damn chain. 4 eva. If you think that's too much, then perhaps you are selling your coins too cheaply.

If I'm not buying blockspace when I'm buying bitcoin, then what the hell am I buying?

As many times as you've quoted me, you've never refuted my argument.  You know damn well I wasn't being literal, as I've repeated many times. But yes, the hodlers are the owners as the bitshares network make more clear by having a less confusing name for the trading tokens.  

How many coins you got, Fucktard? Are you an owner or a miner employee?  Who do you think buys those coins if not people like me? Who do you think is going to use a hobby network with a 7 TPS capacity when the transaction costs (currently around $4) go unsubsidized? Hell, even ACH is cheaper than that.

What argument, this one ?

I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?

 Cheesy

There will be a gang of persons willing to pay  5$, 10$, hell 50$ for true monetary sovereignty.

These people are presently paying orders of magnitude more to move their money around the world unnoticed.

So that's your answer? criminals? A network that is useful only to criminals will get isolated. the on-ramps and off-ramps are vulnerable.  I'm an anarcho-capitalist, so I could give a fuck if bitcoin is used to buy drugs or launder money, but I also have to live in the real world where the State takes a dim view of such things and has the means to discourage them. There is safety in numbers and a small network makes the users more of a target than a large one with lots of "legitimate" clients. Ever think about that?

Criminals ?

Sure if that's your word for individuals interested in keeping their wealth of out of touch from nation states and their bullies we can call them that.

Let me guess, your idea of "legitimate" clients is the typical pay check to pay check person interested in shopping with BTC at their local supermarket?

It's not MY idea of "legitimate" that is relevant. That's why I used quote marks. You didn't really respond to my argument. I had the same problem with the Seasteaders.  a successful floating anarchotopia would not withstand a  Mark 48 torpedo after the media reported that some floating prostitutes, druggies and gamblers were laundering money for terrorists. You can't beat these assholes playing by their rules. You need human shields. You need the damn Walmart shoppers.

International banks are laundering money for terrorists & drug dealers gimme a fucking break.

The same banks are now refusing large cash deposits. When shit hits the fan where do you think this money will inevitably trickle into?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/big-banks-to-americas-companies-we-dont-want-your-cash-1445161083

Quote
“At some point you wonder whether there will be a shortage of financial institutions willing to take on these balances,” said Kelli Moll, head of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP’s hedge-fund practice in New York, saying that where to hold cash has become an increasing topic of conversation as hedge funds are shown the door by longtime banking counterparties.

Where else but Bitcoin?

Dash? Monero? (less traceable) Bitshares? (much much larger transaction capacity, built in smart contracts, etc) Should I go on?  Network effect didn't save MySpace.



2785. Post 12724694 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 19, 2015, 03:55:47 AM
Dash? Monero? (less traceable) Bitshares? (much much larger transaction capacity, built in smart contracts, etc) Should I go on?  Network effect didn't save MySpace.

 Cheesy

So a pre-mined POS & a ripple rip-off are going to steal Bitcoin's lunch money? Please... Cheesy

Comparing Bitcoin network effect to Myspace confirms my suspicions: you are beyond retarded.


Ok, so humor a retard, Einstein. what's wrong with the comparison? What make a four billion dollar first mover advantage so insurmountable in a world where WhatsApp gets sold to FB for 19 billion?



2786. Post 12724750 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 19, 2015, 04:01:18 AM


Bitcoin is not a stock. I was really hoping you were linking to someone
a bit smarter than you so we could get a convincing argument on this.

But no.



Yes it is.  Stock in the first Digital Autonomous Company.  But that's an argument for not shifting the base unit to milibits, not an argument to intentionally cripple the network capacity.



2787. Post 12724814 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 19, 2015, 04:08:08 AM
Dash? Monero? (less traceable) Bitshares? (much much larger transaction capacity, built in smart contracts, etc) Should I go on?  Network effect didn't save MySpace.

 Cheesy

So a pre-mined POS & a ripple rip-off are going to steal Bitcoin's lunch money? Please... Cheesy

Comparing Bitcoin network effect to Myspace confirms my suspicions: you are beyond retarded.


Ok, so humor a retard, Einstein. what's wrong with the comparison? What make a four billion dollar first mover advantage so insurmountable in a world where WhatsApp gets sold to FB for 19 billion?

Cost, retard.

Moving from Myspace to Facebook entails no cost for the user.

Divesting from Bitcoin to some other cryptocurrency "because it is better" undermines the very trust that holds the concept together and would result in a complete destruction of any value created over the years. If we are to assume that something better will always come along why would I invest myself into the current "implementation"?

Your economics, it's broken  Cry

That's a really good question, but I'm glad people are pumping now as it allows me to divest with lower cost. Don't worry though. I'll buy back in probably when a scaling solution is implemented, assuming I haven't found a better altcoin by then.

If you don't want that "complete destruction" you mentioned, you'd be wise to help ensure that there isn't something better by supporting improvements to the protocol.



2788. Post 12724875 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 19, 2015, 04:27:05 AM
Dash? Monero? (less traceable) Bitshares? (much much larger transaction capacity, built in smart contracts, etc) Should I go on?  Network effect didn't save MySpace.

 Cheesy

So a pre-mined POS & a ripple rip-off are going to steal Bitcoin's lunch money? Please... Cheesy

Comparing Bitcoin network effect to Myspace confirms my suspicions: you are beyond retarded.


Ok, so humor a retard, Einstein. what's wrong with the comparison? What make a four billion dollar first mover advantage so insurmountable in a world where WhatsApp gets sold to FB for 19 billion?

Cost, retard.

Moving from Myspace to Facebook entails no cost for the user.

Divesting from Bitcoin to some other cryptocurrency "because it is better" undermines the very trust that holds the concept together and would result in a complete destruction of any value created over the years. If we are to assume that something better will always come along why would I invest myself into the current "implementation"?

Your economics, it's broken  Cry

That's a really good question, but I'm glad people are pumping now as it allows me to divest with lower cost. Don't worry though. I'll buy back in probably when a scaling solution is implemented, assuming I haven't found a better altcoin by then.

If you don't want that "complete destruction" you mentioned, you'd be wise to help ensure that there isn't something better by supporting improvements to the protocol.

Why not move to BitSharesforum then and give us a break? By the sounds of it it's better right? I mean... it can scale to trillions of transactions, what else could you possibly want.



Because I don't want a race car. I want an armored truck, just one with more than a ten pound cargo capacity. Still, if they can beef up that car without slowing it down too much, I might



2789. Post 12727560 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 19, 2015, 06:50:12 AM
Dash? Monero? (less traceable) Bitshares? (much much larger transaction capacity, built in smart contracts, etc) Should I go on?  Network effect didn't save MySpace.

 Cheesy

So a pre-mined POS & a ripple rip-off are going to steal Bitcoin's lunch money? Please... Cheesy

Comparing Bitcoin network effect to Myspace confirms my suspicions: you are beyond retarded.


Ok, so humor a retard, Einstein. what's wrong with the comparison? What make a four billion dollar first mover advantage so insurmountable in a world where WhatsApp gets sold to FB for 19 billion?

Cost, retard.

Moving from Myspace to Facebook entails no cost for the user.

Divesting from Bitcoin to some other cryptocurrency "because it is better" undermines the very trust that holds the concept together and would result in a complete destruction of any value created over the years. If we are to assume that something better will always come along why would I invest myself into the current "implementation"?

Your economics, it's broken  Cry

That's a really good question, but I'm glad people are pumping now as it allows me to divest with lower cost. Don't worry though. I'll buy back in probably when a scaling solution is implemented, assuming I haven't found a better altcoin by then.

If you don't want that "complete destruction" you mentioned, you'd be wise to help ensure that there isn't something better by supporting improvements to the protocol.

So NOW you are abandoning ship?  That's a little bit crazy.

I doubt that this lack of a clear direction regarding BTC's scalability is going to be as detrimental to either its long-term or short-term success as you seem to be making it out to be.

Yes, you may be able to profit with some of the volatility of various other investments, yet BTC seems to remain a good long-term and fairly secure vehicle to place a decent amount of capital, currently.  Also there are decent upside potentials with BTC and even considerable likelihood that we could experience a sudden and unannounced doubling or tripling of value with little to NO notice and thereafter NO return to previous price levels....

So ultimately, for your own good, I hope you are NOT being too rash with your seemingly emotional decision to diversify (and/or as you put it "divest" out of BTC).

It doesn't much matter where the ship is, if it's drifting and you see the officer corps fighting with no clear leadership, you start looking for a place and time to disembark. 



2790. Post 12727683 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Elwar on October 19, 2015, 09:36:51 AM
21 Inc is working on decentralizing mining in a big way.

When every kid's video game console is mining bitcoins any thoughts of centralization will be out the window.

except all those microminers will be connected through 21's micropayments channel and mining in 21's pool. How is that decentralization exactly?



2791. Post 12730752 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 19, 2015, 05:56:27 PM
I saw the price is still stay in 264.84$. Yesterday and today still the same.. I will wait next week if the bitcoin price will rise..



Below  is a decent short article summarizing the current BTC price dynamics and giving a summary assessment regarding whether BTC prices will rise in the near future to meet a potential $300 price point. 




http://www.newsbtc.com/2015/10/19/bitcoin-price-technical-analysis-headed-for-300/


By the way, waiting until next week  doesn't help you if there is a price movement this week. ..... hahahahahahahahahahahaha

That depends on which way the price moves, doesn't it?



2792. Post 12736646 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: r0ach on October 20, 2015, 10:15:10 AM
i'd love to see my stash worth more but realistically there are bitcoin auction in Nov, then Dec is holiday season.  i dont really think we will break 300 soon.

The auctions don't really negatively or positively affect price.  If anything, they will positively affect it after someone gets a huge stash then tries to manipulate it up.

and you don't think they will try to manipulate it down prior to the auction?



2793. Post 12743279 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

I'm getting almost 0.04 percent interest PER DAY on my fiat funding @ BFX. Bulls seem to be running out of ammo.



2794. Post 12746421 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on October 21, 2015, 01:13:46 PM
A fake pump is a fake pump. No growth expected with small blocks.

Last I checked this is still being looked at by devs on a weekly basis, with another summit coming up in December. Every single one of them agrees on bigger blocks, now it's just a matter of which proposal gets implemented. It will happen. Why so glum?

I know this sounds paranoid, but I think there is a psyops campaign to prevent consensus.  Small blockers are not making rational arguments. They say it's reckless to make big changes to a 4 billion dollar network, but then they want to wait and take their time to make sure their aren't major negative effects. So what are they going to say when it's a 20 billion dollar network? 

Consensus itself is a potential central point of failure. I think that vulnerability is being exploited.



2795. Post 12748672 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

WillyBot would never have caused a bubble like the November 2013 spike on its own. China was primarily responsible for that pump. It's true that a mad rush for the exits from an exchange where only BTC withdrawals were possible caused buying, but only from those of us with fiat on the exchange.  Nobody in their right mind was sending fiat to Gox when there were so many options for buying cheaper elsewhere.

Krapeles was buying BTC with fake money to keep the illusion of solvency going, but he wouldn't have had to do that if their wasn't a demand for BTC external to EmptyGox.

It was also China's government hostility towards Bitcoin that contributed to the crash as much as the Goxxing.

it was a double whammy up and down. 



2796. Post 12749088 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 21, 2015, 07:23:09 PM

Yeah, just as fake as the $255 dollars that people were buying my BTC for, the same $255 dollars per BTC I withdrew to vacation in the Bahamas.  Aahhh,  I have fond memories of that fake vacation.  At least I can go back and look at all those fake pictures I took to reminisce.


I didn't withdraw my coins for 255 then, just sold and waited for the crash to 60.

If you wanna sell your coins now for $255, I'll buy 40 of them for cash.  



2797. Post 12750369 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: hdbuck on October 21, 2015, 10:15:56 PM

Ohhhh, shhhhiiiiii...

But seriously tarmi... what is the ultimate reason for your pessimistic views on the value of bitcoin?  You have to have something figured up in your head that gives you a reasoning for your hard views.  If you're so sure that bitcoin is going to tank to $60, then please enlighten us as to why.  Especially since there are more and more businesses and companies accepting, mining, exchanging bitcoins... ?


I didn't say that it will tank to 60 $, just that it did tank to 60 after the first bubble (I think the lowest was 50), but I got in at 60. There is a great support there, btw, and I think that in the worst case scenario that support might get tested again during the final capitulation.

now, about businesses and companies accepting bitcoins, that's actually bearish cause merchants don't keep their coins. I would not worry about that anyway because nobody is actually spending the coins except for early adopters and gamblers. there is no incentive to spend them. and miners, well, they have to pay their electricity bills.

I am pessimistic because I don't see the fundamentals for a new bubble sustainable growth. the ongoing discussion about small vs big blocks shows that not even the devs and early adopters know where to go from this point with the blockchain.


ever consider hoard, sit back and relax, til' worldwide dollar/debt big ponzi scheme gets nasty?

It's a chicken and egg problem.  Without assurance that the network will scale, we have to assume it won't (until more information causes us to change our assumptions).  So worldwide economic system goes into a severe depression.  This may be inflationary or DEFLATIONARY. Without active Central Bank intervention, it will be deflationary (the money multiplier goes into reverse) meaning instead of a bunch of rapidly devaluing dollars, everybody has no dollars at all.  In that scenario, Bitcoin may be useful for evading capital controls, protection against depositor bail-ins, etc, but NOT as a hedge on non-existent inflation.

If there is runaway inflation/hyperinflation,  Bitcoin may be useful for evading PRICE controls and as an inflation hedge.

The problem is that even assuming one of these scenarios takes place (a safe assumption IMHO), the network would crash with the extra transaction load. We're not talking about a doubling of transactions. We're talking about a doubling EVERY WEEK.  Even if one of these scaling solutions is implemented,  transaction capacity could easily still be exceeded.  There is no way currently to deal with a problem of that magnitude short of removing the blocksize limit altogether.

If another cryptocoin scales better, people will be essentially forced to use it instead and they would have no reason to ever switch back because the altcoin core devs can simply copy any code improvements Bitcoin adopts to compete.  Miners who switch also would have to reason to switch back because hashpower makes a network more secure which causes demand for coins to go up which makes mining more profitable which brings in more miners and hashpower in a virtuous cycle.  Once the initiative and momentum are lost, it's lost forever. reference AOL, MySpace, etc.  

In short, did you ever consider hording fiat, sit back and relax, 'til transaction limit is exceeded and Bitcoin crashes?




2798. Post 12750449 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: hdbuck on October 21, 2015, 10:57:35 PM

It's a chicken and egg problem.  Without assurance that the network will scale, we have to assume it won't (until more information causes us to change our assumptions).  So worldwide economic system goes into a severe depression.  This may be inflationary or DEFLATIONARY. Without active Central Bank intervention, it will be deflationary (the money multiplier goes into reverse) meaning instead of a bunch of rapidly devaluing dollars, everybody has no dollars at all.  In that scenario, Bitcoin may be useful for evading capital controls, protection against depositor bail-ins, etc, but NOT as a hedge on non-existent inflation.

If there is runaway inflation/hyperinflation,  Bitcoin may be useful for evading PRICE controls and as an inflation hedge.

The problem is that even assuming one of these scenarios takes place (a safe assumption IMHO), the network would crash with the extra transaction load. We're not talking about a doubling of transactions. We're talking about a doubling EVERY WEEK.  Even if one of these scaling solutions is implemented,  transaction capacity could easily still be exceeded.  There is no way currently to deal with a problem of that magnitude short of removing the blocksize limit altogether.

If another cryptocoin scales better, people will be essentially forced to use it instead and they would have no reason to ever switch back because the altcoin core devs can simply copy any code improvements Bitcoin adopts to compete.  Miners who switch also would have to reason to switch back because hashpower makes a network more secure which causes demand for coins to go up which makes mining more profitable which brings in more miners and hashpower in a virtuous cycle.  Once the initiative and momentum are lost, it's lost forever. reference AOL, MySpace, etc.  



Citing coupla early internet fail of a corporations does not make your argument much better. surely by some time bitpay et al. could implode.

Management that is in denial and slow to react to changing situations on the ground is the issue. It's very relevant.



2799. Post 12750508 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Whoever is running this psyops divide-and-conquer blocksize consensus attack has one of two probable motives:

1) Want Bitcoin to crash, price crashes with it, they buy up BTC for pennies and then run a counter psyops campaign to get all the core devs to group hug.

2) Want bitcoin to crash so they can introduce a competing altcoin that they've premined or have some other way of profiting from, perhaps just from being early adopters.

Bitcoin's going to crash if the blocksize isn't raised.  In the event of an economic catastrophe, nobody will care about xaction fees. they will stampede using Bitcoin as an escape from FIAT hell until the exit gets jammed with bodies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalcy_bias




2800. Post 12752718 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Holliday on October 22, 2015, 05:51:22 AM
Whoever is running this psyops divide-and-conquer blocksize consensus attack has one of two probable motives:

1) Want Bitcoin to crash, price crashes with it, they buy up BTC for pennies and then run a counter psyops campaign to get all the core devs to group hug.

2) Want bitcoin to crash so they can introduce a competing altcoin that they've premined or have some other way of profiting from, perhaps just from being early adopters.

Bitcoin's going to crash if the blocksize isn't raised.  In the event of an economic catastrophe, nobody will care about xaction fees. they will stampede using Bitcoin as an escape from FIAT hell until the exit gets jammed with bodies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalcy_bias

Did you ever stop to think that some of us have legitimate concerns about the existing proposals to raise the block size?

I already have certain difficulties running a full node (if I don't change some settings to gimp it, it will often happily consume enough of my bandwidth to bring other internet uses to a crawl) and I have dedicated hardware and top tier home internet speeds.

There is no ulterior motive here. I don't plan to modify my Bitcoin holdings regardless of the exchange rate (I don't speculate at all, ever).

I am what I would consider a Bitcoin fanatic. Beyond the idealistic reasons that I choose to use Bitcoin, I have plenty to lose (financially) if Bitcoin drops in value (and plenty to gain if it increases in value). If I am concerned about my ability (as a Bitcoin fanatic) to run a full node with the current anti-spam (has spam been fixed by the way?) 1MB block size limit in place, what is going to happen when the data I need to share with my peers doubles (or increases 8-fold, wtf!)? When Bitcoin fanatics have doubts about running a full node, I would imagine that the robustness of the decentralized network has been harmed.

Yes, I am of the opinion that I absolutely must run a full node to take full advantage of Bitcoin.

So, before we take the training wheels off the software, perhaps we should take a long hard look at network efficiency (and that fucking miserable database).

In order for Bitcoin to provide us with censorship-proof transactions, it needs to function (and function well) in situations where Bitcoin data is difficult to share. This task obviously becomes more difficult when the amount of data to be shared is increased! Call me crazy, but I won't be happy until the Bitcoin network is running smoothly on a worldwide distributed wireless mesh network (this is what I think needs to happen in order to keep Bitcoin transactions censorship-proof).

What you call a "psyops divide-and-conquer blocksize consensus attack", I call genuine disagreement (and after reading this forum for the past few month, possible inability to reach agreement).

I've used Bitcoin for going on five years now and I can count the number of transactions I've made on my fingers and toes. Every transaction does not need to be censorship-proof in a world where censorship-proof transactions exist.


It wouldn't be an effective attack unless there was genuine disagreement to exacerbate. The shrinking number of nodes could be easily fixed by borrowing a trick from our Proof of Stake friends: Take some fraction of the block reward away from the miners and distribute it to full node operators. Small miners already running nodes would be largely unaffected.  Pool miners would take a little hit, but that's a good thing, right? Pools are a threat to decentralization, aren't they?

I've been in Bitcoin since 2011 also, and I quit running a full node, but since this bear market dragged on so long, I've been forced to arbitrage my coins just to generate some income. This means my transactions on the chain have gone up by a factor of 50.  None of these transactions are dust.

If Bitcoin reaches escape velocity, blockchain traffic will get exponentially higher.  It doesn't matter if sidechains are used or not. It doesn't matter if fees go up to $10/xaction.  If we go from a million active users to a Billion,  we could reduce on chain transactions by 90% and still have well over 100X the current xaction volume. 

Even 1% of current worldwide Western Union and Moneygram, and international wire transfers would far exceed our current 7TPS cap. This doesn't count ACH and SWIFT xfers, credit cards, PayPal, or any other payment processors. 

The blockchain is also used for colored coin xactions which you may or may not consider dust, but if we get even 1% of the volume of NASDAQ, NYSE, and other stock, bond, commodity, and derrivatives market traffic--even just settlements between exchanges--it would swamp Bitcoin.

The block chain is also used for other time stamp operations and these would increase in volume also.

There is NO WAY a mainstream Bitcoin can remain even a symbolic peer-to-peer network without increasing transaction capacity. 

if miners really cared about the falling number of nodes, they would support proposals to give up part of their block reward to full node operators. Until they do that, the only plausible explanation for resisting blocksize increases is GREED. 

You want the price to go up? Give investors more for their money. Give them a network that is more useful. If Bitcoin doesn't, some altcoin will.




2801. Post 12753184 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on October 22, 2015, 07:26:07 AM
Full nodes are pretty easy to fake by calling home to an actual node. There's a reason this direction hasn't been taken.

I didn't know that. Is there any way that you know of to verify a node is an actual full node? 

21 seems to have some way of doing it. They have suggested that their bitcoin computers will get compensated for running a full node more than just the pathetic share of blockreward/hashing power.

The only thing I can think of is some kind of hybrid POW/POS solution, which admittedly is somewhat radical and should be tested on an altcoin first. Are there any hybrid POS/POW coins that exist now?




2802. Post 12753318 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: hdbuck on October 22, 2015, 08:45:26 AM

greed is essential.

I mean the stupid kind of greed that would rather take a bigger slice of a smaller pie.

Which would you prefer, 100% block reward of a $300 coin or 80% of the block reward of $1,000 coin, giving the rest to full node operators.


The same argument applies if you increase blocksize.  The cost of mining a bigger block is lower than the increased value to the network, which will likely make the coins more useful and valuable.




2803. Post 12753475 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote

"I know, I know" many people say you should just use it, get real! you don't walk around with a Gold Bar all the time, do you?

No, but have you seen the price of gold in the last few years? It's stagnant at best. Gold is rarely used as money because of high transaction fees.






Quote
I dont oppose scaling.

Just in due time, with actual metrics, with proper researches and solutions that does not hamper the universality and inalienability of the network, not at the expense of decentralization and censorship resistance, not to hand bitcoin to big corps, whether it be payment processors or mining consortiums, etc etc... and no, i am certainly not craving some "governance" besides bitcoin's own rule, which are meant to be HARD, if not impossible to change.

So how fucking long is "due time"?  You've had YEARS to address this problem, knowing it was coming.  You don't think a TWO YEAR bear market has anything to do with the obstinacy of you and your ilk?

If you choke out the payment processors, you choke out yourself. Censorship resistance is limited by limiting the on and off ramps. If you make Bitcoin only useful for criminals, you will bring the entire weight of the establishment down on us.

Bitcoin is open source. Anyone can copy and modify the code. The ONLY thing that prevents our bankster competition from eating our lunch is our first mover advantage. They have near infinite resources to bring to bear. Coinbase, Circle, Bitpay, etc can switch crytocoins at the snap of the fingers. Even miners can switch easily to another SHA256 coin. If we lose momentum, it's game over. Game fucking over, Man.  

There can be only one reserve currency. There can be only one most marketable commodity. The whole point of money is to eliminate the need for a double coincidence of wants when we barter.

Your time is fucking running out, so get on the goddamn stick, you slow ass-dragging motherfuckers. You won't know it's too late until it's too late.



2804. Post 12753742 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: hdbuck on October 22, 2015, 09:49:23 AM


lol gold? everybody knows it is being manipulated to sustain the petrodollardebt ponzi..

Then that means it is artificially underpriced and you should buy some. Buy enough to force a short squeeze. Oh, you don't have enough fiat to do that? Buy on credit. Not enough credit? Get your friends to help. Don't have enough friends? There you go.

Quote

errr i dont even, sry but this gibberish nonsense completely lacks balance and my bullshitometer is ATH.

let coinbase bitpay et al. crash, surely some other MtGOX scandals will happen too.
but bitcoin does not need them, it is them who need bitcoin to scam the shit outta you.

or please as i said before, do flock to some other "blockchain technology"...

time is precious, trusting bitcoin implies you have plenty since it will never fade out as it is and will probably last longer than you.
banks otoh...

I trust Proof-of-work. I trust elliptical curve cryptography. I trust the economics of a finite currency. I don't trust assholes spewing bullshit about a technology that is better because it never improves.



2805. Post 12753942 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

a six dollar pump? So what? It didn't even trigger my sell order. Why do you even care? What's these assholes like hdbuck even doing on a Wall Observer thread if they don't care about short and intermediate term prices as they claim?



2806. Post 12755112 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 22, 2015, 12:03:11 PM


(Without some automatic and economically sound fee adjustment mechanism, a workaround would be to have a governing body like the international commission that defines and updates (by voting) the Metric System: with no legal power, but with effective moral power derived from competence and representativity.  But try telling that to the libertarians...)

What makes you think libertarians would object to that? Our problem is the initiation of force. Our core value is the NonAgression Principle. Obviously society needs order and structure. Obviously there needs to be rules. We just want those rules to be enforced by imposing opportunity costs and to reserve violence for defensive purposes only.  Nothing in your workaround violates that.



2807. Post 12755176 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 22, 2015, 12:28:30 PM
yolalanda is right. this story about eur vat is purely a coincidence. I mean bs coincidence. this move like any other in this market was orchestrated by institutional investors, whales.

just few hours before the move a newbie  Roll Eyes actually posted here a thread here about price going 5~10 $ up because of it.  

uber-bullish and all, time to open more shorts.

That's dangerous, IMHO. I'm not even considering opening shorts until the $290s, and maybe not even then. I might wait until the top is in and maybe I'll just keep collecting this 0.035% daily interest on my exchange fiat.

Short and long leverage on BFX is going down.  That doesn't indicate direction. it indicates lower volatility.



2808. Post 12755774 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 22, 2015, 01:10:00 PM

I'm not even considering opening shorts until the $290s, and maybe not even then.


yeah, everybody waiting for 290~300 to short this round means 300 probably won't happen. not to mention that there were no serious corrections in this run up. buyers getting exhausted.

There was a flash dump to $258 from $272. I actually picked up some coins there.  Any dump over $10 gives smart traders a chance to reload. You may be right, but I'm not going to risk it.  lending out fiat is a sure profit, albeit a much smaller one.  The last margin cascade was a long squeeze in August. That means the next one is likely a short squeeze. I'm going to wait until after it happens to go short and if it doesn't happen, I'm still in the green. 



2809. Post 12755856 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 22, 2015, 01:25:46 PM
a six dollar pump? So what? It didn't even trigger my sell order. Why do you even care? What's these assholes like hdbuck even doing on a Wall Observer thread if they don't care about short and intermediate term prices as they claim?

I thought that you already sold at the first shot at $270, so you can "divest" a little?


Frequently you have a tendency to talk out of bot sides of your mouth - especially when it comes to your incorporating your book-talk

I did sell, but it flash dumped to $258 and I reloaded. 



2810. Post 12755957 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: noobtrader on October 22, 2015, 02:09:21 PM


(Without some automatic and economically sound fee adjustment mechanism, a workaround would be to have a governing body like the international commission that defines and updates (by voting) the Metric System: with no legal power, but with effective moral power derived from competence and representativity.  But try telling that to the libertarians...)

What makes you think libertarians would object to that? Our problem is the initiation of force. Our core value is the NonAgression Principle. Obviously society needs order and structure. Obviously there needs to be rules. We just want those rules to be enforced by imposing opportunity costs and to reserve violence for defensive purposes only.  Nothing in your workaround violates that.

maybe Prof. Jorge think that libertarian means anarchist.  were it was the same, we shouldnt make 2 word out of it isnt ?
btw : price rises another 10 usd wow... im impressed  Grin

This is debated commonly among anarcho-capitalists. We are so different ideologically from anarcho-socialists (the original anarchist, most common type, and the ones most people think bout when they hear the word "anarchist") that it may not even be helpful to use the word at all.

If "anarchist" means "no rulers" or "no monopoly State", then I qualify, but not if it means "no leaders" or no hierarchies at all, then, well that's just stupid.

I'm a hard core free market dude who opposes aggression and coercion.  Some day hopefully there will be enough of us that we can get our own non-hyphenated word.



2811. Post 12756347 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: yolalanda on October 22, 2015, 02:32:06 PM


Most people calling themselves 'Libertarian' or 'Anarchist' have no idea what they mean themselves, no wonder no one else does.
I mean, their poster girl Ayn hates Libers and Anarcaps with a passion, I quote:
"For the record, I shall repeat what I have said many times before: I do not join or endorse any political group or movement. More specifically, I disapprove of, disagree with, and have no connection with, the latest aberration of some conservatives, the so-called “hippies of the right,” who attempt to snare the younger or more careless ones of my readers by claiming simultanteously to be followers of my philosophy and advocates of anarchism. Anyone offering such a combination confesses his inability to understand either. Anarchism is the most irrational, anti-intellectual notion ever spun by the concrete-bound, context-dropping, whim-worshiping fringe of the collectivist movement, where it properly belongs.
Above all, do not join the wrong ideological groups or movements, in order to “do something.” By “ideological” (in this context), I mean groups or movements proclaiming some vaguely generalized, undefined (and, usually, contradictory) political goals. (E.g., the Conservative Party, which subordinates reason to faith, and substitutes theocracy for capitalism; or the “libertarian” hippies, who subordinate reason to whims, and substitute anarchism for capitalism.)"


We are well aware of what Ayn Rand thought of us.  We don't have lots of love for her, either. We do have a serious respect for her contributions to free market thought, but if you wanna look at real intellectual cultists, take a look at the Objectivists.  I mean, even Nathaniel Brandon couldn't get along with her. True intellectuals don't worship their heros. We learn from them and build on the foundation. For example, even Saint Murray Rothbard himself though Intellectual Property was a legitimate concept. It isn't.

Rand was a brilliant but flawed woman.  Her books were interesting and compelling, but hardly great literature. Her philosophy survives now only as an intellectual backwater. How ironic that Rothbard, one of The Chosen, was much less of an elitist.  I respect Rand but I love Rothbard.  I'm a firefighter with two jobs and about as far from being a hippie as you can get and still be white.

EDIT: Rand was also a Jew. Smart people, those Hebes. But smart doesn't always mean right. Karl Marx, for example.




2812. Post 12756463 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 22, 2015, 02:53:59 PM

You've had a bunch of southern racists and a certain australian media mogul telling you for decades that you shouldn't learn about true liberalism and true socialism. That's what makes the US of A such a fucked up place. A strong state is important.  True liberal values are important. A strong democracy is important. The political analfabetism of americans is what's destroying America.

Are you serious? You think we get our ideas from Rupert Murdoch?  We have the largest economy in the world because of...what exactly? The Teamsters?

Ah, yes."true socialism". Socialism has failed everywhere it's been tried because it wasn't "true socialism".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman


I doubt even Marx himself would still believe in the Labor Theory of Value if he had ever been introduced to Marginal Utility. 



2813. Post 12756607 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 22, 2015, 03:28:38 PM
If nobody is forced to do anything then those that are willing to carry things forward can do so. Linux is a simple example of this. Nobody is forced to use Gnome yet there is no consensus on using it. The minority might not like it. But they are not being forced to use it. They can come up with their own GUI or accept it if the majority puts all of the work into Gnome.

Ahem, that is what Gavin and Mike tried to do with BitcoinXT.  But it seeems that "come up with their own implementation" is not allowed in bitcoin space...

I wouldn't write off XT or BIP101 just yet.  You'd be surprised at how a market crash or a network crash can influence people's opinions. Something will be done to implement a scaling solution, we just don't know if it will be before or after the competition comes up with a solution. Either bitcoin will succeed or another cryptocoin will replace it. We just have to wait to see how this plays out.  I may even rent some hashpower on an XTpool if I can afford it.



2814. Post 12756688 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 22, 2015, 03:37:56 PM
maybe Prof. Jorge think that libertarian means anarchist.  were it was the same, we shouldnt make 2 word out of it isnt ?

Indeed I confess that I do not know the difference between the two when it comes to this issue: what decision process they advocate, in place of democratic vote and majority rule?

Oh, Good. I get to school the professor. Anarcho-capitalists are a subset of libertarians.  We differ from "minarchist" libertarians who favor a minimal State.  The former are revolutionaries. The latter are reformers.

AnCaps favor market based decision-making. For example two parties to a conflict can either choose a mutually agreeable third party to resolve disputes or choose to fight it out (but only with their own resources!).  Common law and emergent practices guide collective action. 



2815. Post 12756852 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Almost a perfect descending triangle forming. Look out below!



2816. Post 12757041 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

http://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/innovation/chinese-miner-releases-14-nm-asic-targeting-consumers/

holy crap.  Bitmain's antminer s5 is what? 27 nm? and it sold out in one Day!

anybody want to go in with me on this and resell them on Amazon? You need to buy a minimum of 333 and I don't have that kind of coin just lying around. Ok, maybe I do, but I'm not going to spend that much.

EDIT: I can't find shit on these guys. No website. No listing on Alibaba. nutt'n honey.





2817. Post 12757091 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 22, 2015, 04:30:17 PM

You've had a bunch of southern racists and a certain australian media mogul telling you for decades that you shouldn't learn about true liberalism and true socialism. That's what makes the US of A such a fucked up place. A strong state is important.  True liberal values are important. A strong democracy is important. The political analfabetism of americans is what's destroying America.

Are you serious? You think we get our ideas from Rupert Murdoch?  We have the largest economy in the world because of...what exactly? The Teamsters?

You don't, that's the EU. If you're talking about nation state economy, it's because you have one of the largest populations in the world.

Quote
Ah, yes."true socialism". Socialism has failed everywhere it's been tried because it wasn't "true socialism".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

This sort of speaks to my point. You only refer to socialism as a charicatured bogey. If you've ever spent some time in Sweden, or comparable social democracies, you'd know that the whole basis of the american political debate is perversely skewed to the right.

This hostility you feel towards the state is due to the democratic deficit in the US political system caused by the demonization of the left, intellectual laziness and conformity.

Your anarcho-liberal stance is a conform expression of your unease with this democratic deficit.

Grow some balls! Fight for a state that works FOR the people!

So which is it? If Europe is one economy, then you can't use just a part of it like Sweden as an example of success.  I could cherry pick a few states that do better than the rest as a rebuttal, perhaps one with ethnic homogeneity like Sweden.

I don't need to caricature socialism. I have North Korea.

No State works for the people. If they did, they wouldn't need to be supported involuntarily through taxes.



2818. Post 12757655 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 22, 2015, 05:42:35 PM
AnCaps favor market based decision-making. For example two parties to a conflict can either choose a mutually agreeable third party to resolve disputes or choose to fight it out (but only with their own resources!).  Common law and emergent practices guide collective action. 

Thanks for the lesson! But how would that work, for example, if a village needed to decide the path of a road to a nearby town?

There is no way to predict what would happen for certain, because we aren't central planners.  What is certain is that immanent domain would not be used.  Perhaps the landowners could get together and sell or lease their land to a toll road operator. 

Public goods are either provided by private donors or by assurance contracts. If no road was possible because of hold-outs, then another solution would need to be found. I often contemplate the sorry state of general aviation in America is due to subsidized roads that make individual air travel relatively cost prohibitive. Yesterday was Back to the Future Day. We should have flying cars by now. I blame the Patent office, the FAA and the Eisenhower Interstate Highway system. 



2819. Post 12757837 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Richy_T on October 22, 2015, 05:52:50 PM

anybody want to go in with me on this and resell them on Amazon? You need to buy a minimum of 333 and I don't have that kind of coin just lying around. Ok, maybe I do, but I'm not going to spend that much.



That's just for the chips though, right? Then you actually have to turn them into a miner.

You also forgot to mention the price. The total for 333 chips comes out to $68,000 according to the article.

I don't know and without a website or even a listing on Alibaba, I don't even know how to find out. Assuming they are full miners, they'd likely go for ~$1,000 a piece on Amazon for resale.  At ~$200 each, that would mean that you could build the miners from the chips and still make a nice profit. 

The problem is always the same with buying mining rigs: if the bitcoin price is high enough, they have the incentive to delay shipment and mine with them themselves. If the price drops, then you can't mine for a profit when they do ship. 



2820. Post 12758422 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 22, 2015, 06:41:50 PM

This hostility you feel towards the state is due to the democratic deficit in the US political system caused by the demonization of the left, intellectual laziness and conformity.

The demonization of the left on Fox News is countered by the demonization of the right and free market in general on CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN and basically Hollywood, New York, and Washington D.C.  

Quote
....Europe is a continent.

The EU is a supranantional political and economic union where each country remains sovereign states but in most respects function as a singular economy together. Sweden is a sovereign nation state which also happens to be part of the EU. I don't know how much clearer I can get. If it helps, my interpretation of "the largest economy in the world" is in line with that of The IMF, The World Bank and The CIA World Fact Book (link). The UN still ranks you 1st though.

Sweden isn't even in the Monetary Union. They have their own currency.  Why not use Greece, Italy, Portugal, Ireland or Spain?   Perhaps because Catholic countries lack the protestant work ethic that both Sweden and The U.S. have? (ok, had. Both countries are going to shit at a rapid pace, just not as fast as the PIIGS.)


If I was cherry picking I would pick my own country, Norway, but I don't think it is representative. Not so much because of the fact that it's far more homogeneous, but because its economy is fueled by copious amounts of oil and gas. Sweden is among the most liberal on immigration in Europe and as a result 26.5% of its population are immigrants. The homogeneity of a country is only an issue where racism is such that people don't want to take part in a system where people of another ethnicity might benefit.

Quote

Of course, if you think hereditary stalinist totalitarianism is representative for all socialist thought then I guess you don't have to spend any more energy thinking about this stuff.

Congratulations! Argument Won!

Stalinist means socialism.: ok, how about East Germany, Yugoslavia, Cuba, Poland, Russia (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Syria, Iraq under Saddam Hussein, Venezuela...


Quote
Would it help if I used p2p terminology and refer to it as a "leecher problem"?

Both systems have free riders.  Socialist countries provide healthcare, etc for everyone, regardless of their productivity.  Capitalism has businesses that externalize costs, etc.  There is no real solution to leeches short of exterminating them like the National Socialists did.



2821. Post 12758527 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Perhaps you mean DEMOCRATIC socialism, like the People's DEMOCRATIC Reublic of Korea, Like the People's Republic of China, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Lao People's Democratic Republic, and don't forget former East Germany—the German Democratic Republic.

Not THAT kind of democracy. Ok let's be SUPER FAIR and use a European country, the Birthplace of democracy: Greece. The people Elected a PM and a Ruling party specifically to end Austerity. What happened? Austerity. This in spite of a national referendum specifically to reject austerity.  Yeah, democracy!

Democratic Socialism isn't just evil. It doesn't even work. 

You may say it's a perversion of democracy, but what good is a democracy so easily perverted? 



2822. Post 12758695 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 22, 2015, 08:13:19 PM
don't be so superficial and uneducated.

stalinism does not mean socialism, but - stalinism. there are many forms of socialism, yes. think of those various types of it as implementations of communist ideas in a certain area/state. in the authoritarian east you get stalin, yes, but he does not equal socialism.  

also, there is no such thing in the world as a "catholic country", except for vatican city state. also, majority in greece is orthodox.

about christian ethics read niche.

Yeah, I'm not talking religion, but cultures that value hard, productive work and those that don't. Greece is not a Protestant country and certainly has no protestant work ethic.  Northern European countries have better economies than Southern European economies. Their populations, to the degree they are religious at all, are majority protestant, Just like the good ol' U.S. of A. 

Protestantism rejected the authoritarianism of Catholicism and embraced a more individual approach to religion.  This bled over into the cultures and the economies prospered as a result. Socialism threatens to reverse all those gains both here and there.



2823. Post 12758807 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Sweden has it's own currency. It isn't even in the Monetary Union. To claim Europe's economy is bigger than the U.S. by including them (and presumably Great Britain, Switzerland etc) is disingenuous.  If you include them, then you must also include eastern Europe, the Balkans, etc.

You say our population is large, then how about comparing per capita income? Again, including Turkey, Slovenia, etc.  After tax per capita income makes us Yanks look even better. We made so much money we could afford to bail out Europe and defend your asses when attacked from National SOCIALISTS or threatened by the Union of SOCIALIST Soviet republics. 

Sweden, like America, is coasting. We are enjoying the benefits of the freedoms of earlier, more economically free generations. They built up credit and now we are living off of it. Those benefits are running out. Greece is the Ghosts of Christmas Future.



2824. Post 12758885 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 22, 2015, 08:42:31 PM

Oh, the nazis had the word socialist in their party's name, therefore they must be the pinnacle of socialism.  I hope you are being intellectually dishonest. If not, then this is the perfect example of the political analphabetism mentioned earlier.

Who do you think is the Pinnacle of Socialism?  Countries coasting off of North Sea oil revenues?  Countries relying on NATO for defense? 

We're talking about collectivism vs. individualism.  Take all the victims of all the individual serial killers in the world, add them up and compare the numbers to those murdered by the State and see what you come up with. Hell, take all the murders ever committed by anyone not in a uniform or a robe and stack them up against the victims of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Hussein, and Pol Pot. 

You claim to care about minorities. The smallest minority is the individual. Care about him. 




2825. Post 12759017 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 22, 2015, 09:04:26 PM
Perhaps you mean DEMOCRATIC socialism, like the People's DEMOCRATIC Reublic of Korea, Like the People's Republic of China, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Lao People's Democratic Republic, and don't forget former East Germany—the German Democratic Republic.

Not THAT kind of democracy. Ok let's be SUPER FAIR and use a European country, the Birthplace of democracy: Greece. The people Elected a PM and a Ruling party specifically to end Austerity. What happened? Austerity. This in spite of a national referendum specifically to reject austerity.  Yeah, democracy!

Democratic Socialism isn't just evil. It doesn't even work. 

You may say it's a perversion of democracy, but what good is a democracy so easily perverted? 

You're not even cherry picking. You're just ranting.

Sweden has it's own currency. It isn't even in the Monetary Union. To claim Europe's economy is bigger than the U.S. by including them (and presumably Great Britain, Switzerland etc) is disingenuous.  If you include them, then you must also include eastern Europe, the Balkans, etc.

Look, retard, I never said anything about Europe. I even tried to explain to you that Europe was a continent, not an economic entity. What I, The IMF, The World Bank, and your friggin CIA has been talking about is = THE EUROPEAN UNION

and that's not ranting? I'm kinda fuzzy on the distinction.



2826. Post 12759174 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 22, 2015, 09:04:26 PM


Look, retard, I never said anything about Europe. I even tried to explain to you that Europe was a continent, not an economic entity.

This whole thing started when I said that the U.S.A. was the world's largest economy. You brought up Europe as a counterclaim and now you are saying it's not an economic entity. What the fuck, Man?


Quote
... The US had a budget surplus when Bush Jr took over and introduced Big-Government Conservatism. Socialists didn't flush the american economy down the toilet, right wing loons did. I know we're supposed to blame Obama, but the only mistake he made was that he thought he could work with the republicans. He should have run them over. They're bad for the country.

You won't catch me defending that idiot Bush.  He himself said he had to "sacrifice his free market principles in order to save the free market" meaning of course he had no free market principles. It could be argued that is was a Republican congress who gave us the budget surplus under Clinton, but I won't. It was additional tax revenues from the loose money boom and stock bubble caused by Fed Chair Alan Greenspan.
Also from low oil prices when the U.S. was a net importer.

I'm not a conservative but get your facts strait. Bush was not right wing. He's the son of Rockefeller Republican GHW Bush. He federalized education (no child left behind), appointed exclusively Catholics and Jews to the supreme court (not wrong, but not conservative either), and increased immigration from Latin countries. Again, I am not criticizing those policies here, but bush was an establishment warmonger, not even a conservative socially. Absolutely, incontrovertibly not a fiscal conservative. 


 




2827. Post 12759274 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 22, 2015, 09:16:39 PM
I want that individual to be protected by a welfare state which has complete monopoly of violence and works according to the rule of law.

A system where the State violates the very rules in enforces on others (especially re the initiation of force and coercion) is not Rule of Law. it is Rule of Man.  A government that selectively interprets and enforces the very Constitution that supposedly limits its power is not limited.

The government cannot provide anything that it does not forcibly take away in the first place (by taxing) or by borrowing (promising to tax in the future). The State cannot credibly protect rights when it is dependent on violating rights (extortion-taxes, potato-spud) just to exist.

Anarcho-capitalism is the only system that consistently applies the only three rules society needs: don't  hurt or threaten people. Don't take or mess with their property. Keep your promises. That is Rule of Law.

You want to help people in need. Good. Most people do or we wouldn't have subsidized healthcare, etc. But you want other people to pay their "fair share" even if they don't want to. There's no such thing as a "fair share" taken by force.  Forced contribution is as close to charity as rape is to love. In other words, you're monsters masquerading as philanthropists. Fuck you. My money is my money and nobody should tell me what to do with it, least of all some economically illiterate morons with good intentions.

Subsidize poverty, you get more poverty. Tax wealth and you get less wealth. Regulate innovation and you get less innovation. 



2828. Post 12759469 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 22, 2015, 09:59:53 PM

You think appointing jews and catholics is "not conservative"?


"Conservative" generally means "resistant to change". In Russia the conservatives are communists. In America, they are free market protestants.  It's not a good thing or a bad thing. In fact, conservatism is doomed to failure eventually because the only constant in the universe is change. With no change, time stops.

I'm bored with this hypersensitivity to even the faintest whiff of perceived racism. This is not the place for such discussions. I regret even mentioning Rothbard, Rand and Marx were Jews.  I merely meant to point out that my hero Murray Rothbard was absolutely not an elitist like Rand.  I forgot how easily children get distracted by things that don't matter.

I'm culturally conservative and that's both good and bad. I say it not to boast or confess. It shouldn't matter. Intellectually I'm a free market individualist. Economically I'm an Austrian. Google that shit if you don't know what I'm talking about.

Now, can we get back to talking about something other than me, such as whether or not the Chinese are going to continue the European pump?  I think $300 is the level to watch, but there are till too many longs and not enough shorts to ensure a bottom is in.




2829. Post 12759519 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 22, 2015, 10:24:01 PM
You're making the same mistake the communists made. You demand that there be no plurality of political conviction. Your "system" will fail if there's a group of "statists" among you, so you'll have to keep an eye out for "statist sentiments". And so on...

I demand nothing. I cannot use force or threat of force to impose my ideas. I simply think the State will destroy itself and I will try to help provide an alternative.

The only thing you could say I demand is a sincere or at least entertaining discussion or I will not participate. Not a big loss if you don't value my contribution.

I think there will always be a few Statist around and that will be useful to remind us why we abandoned Statism.




2830. Post 12759608 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 22, 2015, 10:49:20 PM

I'm sorry. Bad humour. I actually consider myself a social liberalist, but in your eyes it would probably look like socialism anyways. I don't think I've written anything I don't believe in. Sorry for calling you a retard though. Sometimes the setup is just too good to pass. 

No worries, Man. I've been called far worse.  I couldn't very well advocate radical free speech without having thick skin.



2831. Post 12759703 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Meuh6879 on October 22, 2015, 10:56:48 PM


well, prepare for the friday purge ... ?  Grin perhaps ...

It doesn't look like a top, yet. Big money may push until their is no more resistance before dumping. This usually means a sharp spike or a high volume double top. The key is not to go margin short until AFTER the top. Sure you may miss a good trade, but you don't want to risk getting squeezed. If you wanna short before then, keep it small and set your asks higher that you think will get filled.




2832. Post 12761221 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: rebuilder on October 23, 2015, 04:18:20 AM
what was that 4k+ volume spike on stamp a few hours ago? Buy wall sold into? Ask wall bought? Rapid back-and-forth?

ask wall bought into. Hardly moved the price needle. Generally speaking, smart money places limit orders and dumb money places market orders , so it's bearish if anything but just barely so.  I think bulls have used up too much ammo to punch through $300 resistance, but we'll see. 

On Finex, there's not enough shorts to squeeze.  over 20 million in margin longs have to close on the way up and the auction is coming soon.  Resolution to the block size problem is nowhere in sight. 




2833. Post 12768997 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

I have had no cash buyers for two days for my arbitrage trades, this despite lowering my margins.

Buyers getting exhausted or just taking a pause before resuming the pump?




2834. Post 12769321 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Dilla on October 24, 2015, 02:16:45 AM
I think we will test 300, who knows how that will go, but I think we will test it either this weekend or beginning of next week. For some reason I think this time will be different than the last two attempts.

Patterns. There were four Four Punch Raids on the way down. Now there have been three pump-n-dumps to ~$300

1) the Coinbase exchange moonpump
2)March pump (failed to reach $300)
3) Greece Pump
4) current pump

Each Four Punch Raid got flatter than the one before it in the charts. Each Pump-n-dump at the bottom got flatter. This could be the last one before the recovery begins.  Let's hope we're still near the bottom when the U.S. Marshall's auction happens, just to keep the Gov from getting more of our money.  The blocksize controversy should prevent Bitcoin from reaching escape velocity before then.





2835. Post 12777866 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: Feri22 on October 25, 2015, 12:33:28 AM

yes, we most likely will hit 300 the coming days, but china is just a non-event. thats basically all just fake over there. imo they have maybe 1/10 of the stamp volume at best.


China doesn't even really exist. Everybody knows that.

Edit: $290 just broken.

China the country or China the btc volume exchange?  Grin

Is the rally really coming?? I sense so much fear from trolls and bears last days...the arguments why it should not go up are getting weaker and weaker...

Really? so we're going to the moon at the rate of seven transactions/second?



2836. Post 12777876 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: noobtrader on October 25, 2015, 02:49:04 AM

I wonder what tarmi feel after he taking profit at 258, and now its near 285 ?  Cheesy

If he's anything like me, he's feeling great. I'm lending out my fiat for $5/day for every $10,000.  I don't care if it ever comes back down. That's why I have all those coins in cold storage.



2837. Post 12780800 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 25, 2015, 10:33:50 AM
What the hell is going on? I woke up, switched on my computer, checked bitcoinwisdom and I couldn't believe the charts I was seeing.
Any specific trigger the last few hours? Is the space ship finally taking off?  Cheesy Wink
No no of course this is great but let's see how far it goes.I learned not to get too excited over the last year.I hope the baby is not going up full throttle.3rd gear would be ok for now.

If the rise is indeed due to MMM's "Republic of Bitcoin" ponzi, it may continue for a while, unfortunately. Mavrodi's previous scams are estimated to have moved 10 billion dollars.  Turnout was 50 million dollars per day at one point -- 50 times what bitcoin miners are sucking from bitcoin buyers at present. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMM_(Ponzi_scheme_company)

Something tells me that the Bitcoin Alliance, created to cleanse bitcoin space from criminals and scammers, will pretend not to see that one.

By the way, note that 50 people committed suicide when MMM finally collapsed.

I agree that a ponzi scheme is bad and a lot of people are probably going to get hurt, but that's not Bitcoin's fault.  How many ponzi schemes were build on dollars? The original scam by  Charles Ponzi was based on stamps. Are stamps bad?

You can't blame Bitcoin for the actions of the people who use it. It's a tool that can be used for good or evil.  The jungle has no zookeeper. This is the price of freedom.  The Real on the other hand is a scam that everyone in your country is FORCED to participate in. 



2838. Post 12782102 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 25, 2015, 11:39:44 AM
How many people committed suicide (or were thrown back into abject, inescapable poverty) when the Brazilian command and control fiat monetary system last collapsed (for the umpteenth time in a row)??

Why do you bring that up whenever bitcoin's faults and miseries are pointed out?  Do you think that somehow bitcoin will be a better monetary system than the Venezuelan bolivar or the Zimbabwean dollar?  Do you think that it will end economic exploitation of the poor by the rich?  Looking at its history and economy, I see no reason to expect those things.  Why are you so sure that the 21 million limit will never be lifted, or that there will never be a negative interest tax on blockchain accounts?  Why are you so sure that it will not be superseded by some other cryptoscam in a few years time?

We can't even manage to lift the 1 mb blocksize cap and you think it's possible to increase the 21 M limit? 

I mean it's not impossible, but if the block size controversy is any indication, it would take years and then there would be plenty of time to bail before it happens.

There seems to be a basic economic principle that some people just can't seem to comprehend or accept: CAPITAL IS MOBILE.  Wealth flows from areas where it is less free to areas where it is more free.  It always has and always will.  This is a good thing. If capital wasn't mobile, we'd all be slaves.



2839. Post 12782617 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

I've been researching this MMM ponzi and it may have the potential to reach critical mass, soak up all liquidity and go supernova before collapsing into a black hole.  I can easily see how non-sophisticated investors could fall for something like this. 

I don't think we even have the ability to stop this by shorting. We might even make it worse if it goes too high by being force-liquidated into a margin squeeze.  I'm back in fiat, lending out dollars at ~30% interest and watching this thing play out. It will end in tears. 





2840. Post 12782833 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 25, 2015, 02:17:06 PM
How many ponzi schemes were build on dollars? The original scam by  Charles Ponzi was based on stamps. Are stamps bad? You can't blame Bitcoin for the actions of the people who use it. It's a tool that can be used for good or evil.

Bitcoin makes the MMM scam global and more difficult to stop (and adds bitcoin's own pyramid on top of it). 

The Russian government was almost useless in stopping Sergei's previous Russian scam, but it did eventually put him in jail for a couple of years.  Now that he uses bitcoins, who is going to catch and prosecute him? How can his gains be confiscated and returned to the victims?

Quote
The Real on the other hand is a scam that everyone in your country is FORCED to participate in. 

The tiny difference is that no one is trying to convince Brazilians to "invest" their money in reals; quite the opposite.  And no one is promising that the real will "go to the moon" -- like Andreessen, Silbert, the Winkles, and all other bitcoin peddlers are doing.


Do you not know the history of your own currency? When Brazil was experiencing one it it's periodic bouts of hyperinflation the gov/banksters had everyone put two price tags on everything, one with the "REAL" (non-inflationary) price. When they had everyone convinced the REAL was not subject to inflation, they abandoned the old currency and made the Real legal tender.  After that of course they ramped up the printing presses like they always do.

So, you are wrong, but even if you weren't, FORCING people to use a currency is far worse than tricking them. Legal tender laws are coercion. We can defend against frauds by using our wits and critical thinking. How can we defend ourselves against thugs who not only demand we participate in their protection racket, but that we use their monopoly money to do so?




2841. Post 12783750 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

over 3/4 Million new USD longs. Over 2,000 new BTC shorts on BFX.  That's very little safety net when this rally stalls out. 

~23 Million in margin longs that got to cover on the way up.  Only 14,000 in shorts total to cover to halt a crash.

We're going somewhere, either up or down. But hanging out on a cliff edge is not going to last.



2842. Post 12783848 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 25, 2015, 05:21:03 PM

Lifting the 21 million limit will happen if the miners see it as being more profitable than the alternative. Oh, just by a little, and there will be plenty of rented experts to explain that the change is actually good for bitcoin...  (But we have been through this discussion before...)

Every government wants to have a strong and stable currency; but some of them end up printing lots of money to cover their expenses, even though that hurts the currency.  When the US government created the dollar, it promised to back each bill in gold or siver; but it eventually reneged on that promise. I don't see why the promises of the bitcoin protocol -- that were made by humans, and depend on humans honoring them -- will have a different fate.

So you don't see how force is different from persuasion?  The monopoly government's can mandate use of their scrip. We have neither their ability to coerce nor their perceived legitimacy. If the 21 M cap is lifted, the market will reject bitcoin and I will be among the first to divest myself entirely.  The markets regulate better than States do.



2843. Post 12783919 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on October 25, 2015, 05:45:17 PM


That $22-23 million in longs weren't liquidated even in the $160 flash crash, I agree that I would feel better about this rally with shorts hitting new highs rather than floundering about like they are. (Sometimes I shudder to think what BFX actually did that day though, they might have had to flip the breaker before the whole thing unwound...  Shocked)


Yeah, I got caught with my pants down like everybody else. If we had hit double digits I would have gotten a margin call too.  I'm gonna try to leave leverage to people smarter or luckier than me from now on.



2844. Post 12784162 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: molecular on October 25, 2015, 06:18:31 PM


That $22-23 million in longs weren't liquidated even in the $160 flash crash, I agree that I would feel better about this rally with shorts hitting new highs rather than floundering about like they are. (Sometimes I shudder to think what BFX actually did that day though, they might have had to flip the breaker before the whole thing unwound...  Shocked)


Yeah, I got caught with my pants down like everybody else. If we had hit double digits I would have gotten a margin call too.  I'm gonna try to leave leverage to people smarter or luckier than me from now on.

Wait... are you saying you've had a long position open for how long?

Of course not. The bounce after the last $316 top.  Quintupled down after the bottom and closed with a profit at about $235.  All this $2-300 range trading is just noise until we get this blocksize issue resolved.



2845. Post 12784342 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: natewelt on October 25, 2015, 06:42:37 PM


That $22-23 million in longs weren't liquidated even in the $160 flash crash, I agree that I would feel better about this rally with shorts hitting new highs rather than floundering about like they are. (Sometimes I shudder to think what BFX actually did that day though, they might have had to flip the breaker before the whole thing unwound...  Shocked)


Yeah, I got caught with my pants down like everybody else. If we had hit double digits I would have gotten a margin call too.  I'm gonna try to leave leverage to people smarter or luckier than me from now on.

Wait... are you saying you've had a long position open for how long?

Of course not. The bounce after the last $316 top.  Quintupled down after the bottom and closed with a profit at about $235.  All this $2-300 range trading is just noise until we get this blocksize issue resolved.

Oh it all makes sense now...

closed my MARGIN long. I was still 100% long until the $260s...



2846. Post 12784422 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: BitofaN1 on October 25, 2015, 06:55:39 PM
I still think this rally is about market makers getting sure nobody else gets 44k cheap coins at the martial auction, that could threaten their positions.
I expect this to continue for at least 10 more days, with peak around 3-4th of November.

We don't know if the buyers are going to hold or dump. The only thing we do know is that the damn government gets the cash and I hope that amount is as low as possible. 



2847. Post 12784760 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 25, 2015, 07:38:32 PM
I still think this rally is about market makers getting sure nobody else gets 44k cheap coins at the martial auction, that could threaten their positions.
I expect this to continue for at least 10 more days, with peak around 3-4th of November.

We don't know if the buyers are going to hold or dump. The only thing we do know is that the damn government gets the cash and I hope that amount is as low as possible. 



the more they pay the coins on auction less likely is that they will dump them. draper paid what, 600 $ a piece? lel

We don't know for sure Draper didn't dump them or lend them out to short sellers, do we? What we can logically deduce is that buyers won't dump them for less than they pay unless the price goes down and stays down for a long time. The key is the RELATIVE differential between spot price and what they pay.



2848. Post 12785155 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Something smallblockers should see:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-PxjIa4gBg



2849. Post 12786406 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: NSA360 on October 25, 2015, 11:46:18 PM
Get in again... Last Call


Are you sure about that?



2850. Post 12786606 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 26, 2015, 12:22:15 AM
When are the next big BTC auctions? I can't wait for this crash Tongue Gonna be lovely. A beautiful disaster. We could see a floor sub $200 again.

This is the last one for the US gov. The Australian gov has 20k something coins to sell though.

The big dagger hanging over our heads is really the 200k gox coins that need to be sold or returned to the victims. I'm sure a percentage of those people will be market selling and dusting their hands of the whole thing.


I'm sure, and maybe you are to, that you are speculating beyond any reasonable basis in reality.


It makes little to no sense to assume that once the 200k gox coins are liberated back into the bitcoin space (in other words put back on the btc market in the hands of various individuals that those individuals are going to, enmasse, decide to dump the  coins, or a large majority of the coins).

Your prediction makes little to no sense, if it were to employ actual logic and a morsel of thinking.  Roll Eyes

Don't you know how bankruptcies work? The lawyers get paid FIRST. There is very little other than those coins to distribute. Creditors and claimants will get almost nothing. Those coins will be SOLD almost entirely to pay the lawyers.



2851. Post 12786646 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on October 26, 2015, 12:50:07 AM
When are the next big BTC auctions? I can't wait for this crash Tongue Gonna be lovely. A beautiful disaster. We could see a floor sub $200 again.

This is the last one for the US gov. The Australian gov has 20k something coins to sell though.

The big dagger hanging over our heads is really the 200k gox coins that need to be sold or returned to the victims. I'm sure a percentage of those people will be market selling and dusting their hands of the whole thing.


I'm sure, and maybe you are to, that you are speculating beyond any reasonable basis in reality.


It makes little to no sense to assume that once the 200k gox coins are liberated back into the bitcoin space (in other words put back on the btc market in the hands of various individuals that those individuals are going to, enmasse, decide to dump the  coins, or a large majority of the coins).

Your prediction makes little to no sense, if it were to employ actual logic and a morsel of thinking.  Roll Eyes

Don't you know how bankruptcies work? The lawyers get paid FIRST. There is very little other than those coins to distribute. Creditors and claimants will get almost nothing. Those coins will be SOLD almost entirely to pay the lawyers.

200k btc for some lawyers...  Shocked

Have they been selling these along the way or do they get dumped all at once?

There's over $100 Billion in claims against MTGox, most of them bullshit.  The suits have to comb through them to figure out which ones are legit. That takes time and lawyers get paid what? $500/HR?



2852. Post 12787024 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 26, 2015, 01:51:02 AM

I will concede that paying of various fees (such as legal fees) could potentially cause scenarios in which the coins could get dumped in fairly large volumes - it is by NO means certain, and at this time, likely there is NO real utility to speculate in grandiose ways regarding what exactly is going to happen to those coins when they are returned to private hands. 


investing/speculating is like gambling. You calculate odds and you asses risk.  If a card had a 35% chance of winning you $100, then you pay up to $35 to see that next card and no more.

if there is a >50% chance that >50% of 200,000 coins get dumped on a market, then  we can price that in as a minimum of 14 days worth of mined coins extra supply.  It's like delaying the halving for a month.



2853. Post 12793008 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: gentlemand on October 26, 2015, 05:15:45 PM

Whats so special about gemini? (cant register, im outside USA)
That twins are so dumb. They bought coins around 400-500.. another failed investment as i see  Grin
FaceCoins, this time

They finished the vast majority of their buying well under the sub $10 range.

Not true. They have said their average buy in is "around $100".



2854. Post 12806210 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Damn!  USD is running 0.06% daily on BFX. more than 10X the interest rate on BTC.

EDIT: now >0.08!



2855. Post 12806615 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on October 28, 2015, 03:15:20 AM
Damn!  USD is running 0.06% daily on BFX. more than 10X the interest rate on BTC.

EDIT: now >0.08!


In the past 30 days, we have had a return of nearly 30%, and I calculate that to be approximately 1% per day, on average.  The past month as been a good time to have been in BTC.
By my estimation, we're in a 45 day-ish run that has been reasonable enough to suggest that this isn't a pump and way different than the last few. That's quite some time and likely shouts that we're into something way apart from the last runs. No one can doubt that the halving is or will be having an effect in a large way now or in the short term. Moon? That's right I said it!

I'm gonna pee in you pool a little. If you investment goes down 50% and then goes up 50%, you still have only 75% of what you started with. If BTC was $100, then went down to $50, then back up to $75, that's what I mean.

All of this extra activity related to the Mavrodi pyramid is likely to increase the number of xactions on the network.  If this leads to a backlog,  no fee xactions will probably never get confirmed and fees will go up for anyone who needs their bitcoin transferred in a timely manner, possibly up substantially. 

The power of exponential growth can be truly awesome.  possibly faster. A ponzi scheme needs an ever-expanding pool of suckers to continue.  A collapse is inevitable regardless of the block size outcome. This pump can last for a long time, but if the goddamn blocksize cap isn't raised (or preferably eliminated entirely), it's going to collapse when the network crashes which may be even before Mavrodi runs out of suckers.

Leveraged shorts are going up substantially on BFX, as well as longs.  If I had to guess, there will be a short squeeze before a long squeeze.  Liquidity providers have been caught unprepared for the short term demand of the ponzi.  It cannot last but can go on for months.  When this thing unwinds, we may find ourselves in a new Nash equilibrium below $200.  The fallout will damage Bitcoin possibly even worse than Gox.  Expect more bans and heavier regulation. 



2856. Post 12807009 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on October 28, 2015, 04:25:11 AM
-snip-
All of this extra activity related to the Mavrodi pyramid is likely to increase the number of xactions on the network.  If this leads to a backlog,  no fee xactions will probably never get confirmed and fees will go up for anyone who needs their bitcoin transferred in a timely manner, possibly up substantially.  

The power of exponential growth can be truly awesome.  possibly faster. A ponzi scheme needs an ever-expanding pool of suckers to continue.  A collapse is inevitable regardless of the block size outcome. This pump can last for a long time, but if the goddamn blocksize cap isn't raised (or preferably eliminated entirely), it's going to collapse when the network crashes which may be even before Mavrodi runs out of suckers.

Leveraged shorts are going up substantially on BFX, as well as longs.  If I had to guess, there will be a short squeeze before a long squeeze.  Liquidity providers have been caught unprepared for the short term demand of the ponzi.  It cannot last but can go on for months.  When this thing unwinds, we may find ourselves in a new Nash equilibrium below $200.  The fallout will damage Bitcoin possibly even worse than Gox.  Expect more bans and heavier regulation.  

Do you really think MMM victims in china would throw this much money at the exchanges? Is Mr. Mavrodi hodling the coins vs liquidating them as they come in? As they are basically tx's transferring between the off chain chinese exchanges to the off chain MMM database... do you really see an explosion in tx growth?... (not seeing it here https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin/)

Listen, I agree that increasing the max_block_size is getting critical, and we likely couldn't handle the volumes of a repeat of 2013... I'm just trying to avoid getting hyperbolic on both of these issues. Perhaps that's a mistake... but I'm awaiting more evidence.

People associated with MMM have already had their bank accounts seized. "Why "cash out" when it's safer to stay in BTC? It's not just the exchanges. I have sold many coins to people in India via purse.io at >20% over market rates.  Look, when you try to extrapolate out a trend, you look to see what factors could prevent that extrapolation from being an accurate prediction.  I am considering the max size of the Mavrodi Pyramid, and it could be possibly far larger than our small community.  Once a critical mass has been reached, a chain reaction continues until each fission creates <1 additional fission on average.  Chain reactions feed on themselves. China and India by themselves make up more than a third of the world's population. The pool of potential suckers will not be exhausted anytime soon. What's more,  Bitcoin was designed to prevent  restrictions on trade. If the exchanges stop or restrict payments to Mavrodi, traffic may go up instead of down. It's only the main chain that's censorship resistant. Look at what has happened already. MMM only has to double in size four or five times before the network crashes for certain. Average blocksize is roughly about half a MB already. Do the math. am I being hyperbolic?  



2857. Post 12809305 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: AlexGR on October 28, 2015, 06:13:51 AM
Average blocksize is roughly about half a MB already. Do the math. am I being hyperbolic?  

Half a megabyte which is full of dust / spam transactions.

The blockchain is extremely valuable to be used in this way.



Some of those dust xactions are colored coins and timestamps carrying far more than their nominal value.



2858. Post 12810605 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: ImI on October 28, 2015, 01:41:38 PM

310-320 = resistance

I would be ok with that. Important is not to drop significantly.

i like that we are not in panicbuying-mode yet. slow and steady looks good so far.

if there is no panic buying, then why am I getting 0.09% DAILY interest on my fiat at BFX?




2859. Post 12810667 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: TaurusBit on October 28, 2015, 02:09:35 PM

310-320 = resistance

I would be ok with that. Important is not to drop significantly.

i like that we are not in panicbuying-mode yet. slow and steady looks good so far.

if there is no panic buying, then why am I getting 0.09% DAILY interest on my fiat at BFX?



Let's see.. Last 24 Change: +3.08%

That's more than 0.09% interest. Better keep your holdings in BTC.  Wink

Early adopters like me keep the vast majority of our coins in cold storage. It's only my trading stash that's in fiat. 



2860. Post 12810761 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: brg444 on October 28, 2015, 02:15:03 PM

310-320 = resistance

I would be ok with that. Important is not to drop significantly.

i like that we are not in panicbuying-mode yet. slow and steady looks good so far.

if there is no panic buying, then why am I getting 0.09% DAILY interest on my fiat at BFX?



Let's see.. Last 24 Change: +3.08%

That's more than 0.09% interest. Better keep your holdings in BTC.  Wink

Early adopters like me keep the vast majority of our coins in cold storage. It's only my trading stash that's in fiat. 

So why the urgency for "MOAR TRANSACTIONS" then?

Urgency? Gavin has been pushing for this for over TWO YEARS. Should we wait for it to become urgent?  Smallblockers like to pose as the calm conservative side, but the prudent, conservative thing to do it address the issue before in becomes urgent. You won't know it's too late until it's too late.



2861. Post 12812103 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: molecular on October 28, 2015, 03:52:48 PM

310-320 = resistance

I would be ok with that. Important is not to drop significantly.

i like that we are not in panicbuying-mode yet. slow and steady looks good so far.

if there is no panic buying, then why am I getting 0.09% DAILY interest on my fiat at BFX?



Let's see.. Last 24 Change: +3.08%

That's more than 0.09% interest. Better keep your holdings in BTC.  Wink

Early adopters like me keep the vast majority of our coins in cold storage. It's only my trading stash that's in fiat. 

That's how I used to do it (what seems like) ages ago: keep USD on exchange and lend it out.

Nowadays, to reduce exchange risk, I keep less on the exchange and just go short on leverage.

The psychology sucks (you're looking at a position that's constantly in the red instead of repeated green interest payments), but it's the same thing (minus some interest I pay on BTC swaps and some opportunity cost on USD interest that more than makes up the exchange risk imo).


It's not an either or thing. i keep the terms of my loans short so I can use the funds myself if the situation warrants. Basically, I never leverage long until just AFTER a long squeeze and never leverage short until just after s a short squeeze. As these events are often separated by months, I gain interest in the mean time. 

I also keep a few BTC handy for arbitrage, but that doesn't matter if the price is going up or down. Going down I save of the rebuy. Going up I make money on the sale.  This trade doesn't scale so I don't need much. 



2862. Post 12814663 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 28, 2015, 06:39:45 PM

In the end, changes in the relationship of fiat to bitcoin is going to take years and years to work out - because in essence, it is going to be really difficult for various governments to fight bitcoin.



I dunno about that. This Rough Consensus Attack seems to be working amazingly well. 




2863. Post 12815131 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on October 28, 2015, 10:26:26 PM

7. bitcoin has NO PRIVACY... this makes it unconstitutional. EVERY transaction is recorded in the blockchain and can be traced. some of the more advanced bitcoin users watch stolen coins move from wallet to wallet all the time.. maybe watching for stolen coins moving is beneficial but clearly bitcoin is like an NSA spyware app.


The constitution regulates the way the government organizes itself. Because it's more difficult to change than regular laws, lawmakers like to stuff it with things they think needs this extra protection, often assorted human rights. But when someone claims that something is unconstitutional, he or she usually points to some action, intended or otherwise, that results in one part of government intervening in another part of governments sphere of power. Like when the military thinks it's best to take over control of the country. Or when a president or general assembly tries to intervene in a court verdict.

In what way, and by what constitution, is Bitcoin unconstitutional?

Yeah, this is nonsensical.  There is a certain implied right to privacy in the Fourth Amendment, but of course that only applies to the Federal government.  To argue that bitcoin violates your right to privacy is like arguing that billboards violate your right to privacy if you post your private information on them. 



2864. Post 12815441 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Blazin8888 on October 28, 2015, 11:18:44 PM
Ethereum isn't going replace Bitcoin. It's a platform for a new way of approaching the internet. It's the only alt project I see much point in.

Not a loaded question, just wondering if you have a better insight into this topic: Care to explain in one or two sentences what Ethereum can do that the Blockchain plus possibly pegged side chains plus some hardware infrastructure linked to these can't do? Never really understood the point of a "Turing complete crypto", I guess.

Eventually Bitcoin and side chains will probably make Ethereum useless. Until then, it's a good altcoin and PoC.  Wink


wrong. Ethereum will empower + stimulate the BTC eco system even more.

Youre thinking backwards brother.

At least Etherium is open source so when it fails we may still be able to salvage some code. Vitalik is a little wimp and I want to punch him in the face and take his milk money. He should be the code guy, the Paul Allen/ Steve Wozniak who has the other guy do the business side.  



2865. Post 12815940 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: spooderman on October 29, 2015, 01:03:00 AM
manbearwhale was so weird. what is the overall take on what happened there? someone eating their own coins?

I dunno, but he's had most of a year to buy back lower on the sly. 




2866. Post 12816062 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on October 29, 2015, 01:24:42 AM
manbearwhale was so weird. what is the overall take on what happened there? someone eating their own coins?

Someone who preferred $9,000,000.

Seemed like a pretty open and fair way to liquidate such a huge number of coins, and the psychology after the action was pretty positive.

Was this before or after what we now know to have been Ethereum dumping their war-chest funding their project?

asking who the bearwhale was...

like asking who Satoshi was.



He was the bearwhale.



Not unless he mined a bunch of coins later. The early blocks that we know Satoshi mined have coins that have never moved.



2867. Post 12816357 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: aminorex on October 29, 2015, 02:07:05 AM
I expect it to decline starting today.  Top is in for the next few weeks, if so.  My 40% alternative scenario is for 3 more weeks going up, touching 300. 
It went up more than my wildest hopes could imagine.  I haven't seen that happen since 2013.  Impressed, I am.  I don't see a reason why it should not continue to exceed my expectations during the rest of the week.  I had might as well up my stake.



Huh? You see no reason why it won't exceed your expectations? You expect your expectations to be exceeded? How does that work? 



2868. Post 12816384 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on October 29, 2015, 01:53:00 AM
Way out west there was this fella... fella I wanna tell ya about. Fella by the name of [redacted]. At least that was the handle his loving parents gave him, but he never had much use for it himself. [redacted], he called himself "The Bearwhale". Now, "Bearwhale" - that's a name no one would self-apply where I come from. But then there was a lot about the Bearwhale that didn't make a whole lot of sense. And a lot about where he lived, likewise. But then again, maybe that's why I found the place so darned interestin'.

They call Bitstamp the "Stamp of Bits." I didn't find it to be that, exactly. But I'll allow there are some nice folks there. 'Course I can't say I've seen okcoin, and I ain't never been to Bulgaria. And I ain't never seen no Lawsky in his damned undies, so the feller says. But I'll tell you what - after seeing Bitstamp, and this here story I'm about to unfold, well, I guess I seen somethin' every bit as stupefyin' as you'd see in any of them other places. And in Slovenian, too. So I can die with a smile on my face, without feelin' like the good Lord gypped me.

Now this here story I'm about to unfold took place back in the late '2014s - just about the time of our conflict with Putin and the separatists. I only mention it because sometimes there's a man... I won't say a hero, 'cause, what's a hero? But sometimes, there's a man. And I'm talkin' about the Bearwhale here. Sometimes, there's a man, well, he's the man for his time and place. He fits right in there. And that's the Bearwhale, at Bitstamp. And even if he's a lazy man - and the Bearwhale was most certainly that. Quite possibly the laziest in Bitcoinia, which would place him high in the runnin' for laziest worldwide. But sometimes there's a man, sometimes, there's a man. Aw. I lost my train of thought here. But... aw, hell. I've done introduced him enough.

That's some damn fine recollectin', that right there. I've heard tell some yarns, but...boy howdy.



2869. Post 12816620 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: gentlemand on October 29, 2015, 02:41:50 AM

Not on mah digital gold settlement network you won't.

Watch it and fume. I am DustWhale. Hear my roar. The small block psychos can kiss my blowhole.

Quality post coming back. Bullish.  A million dollars worth of leveraged longs closed. Excellent. It explains why BFX is slightly below Stamp, but it's also a million less in leverage that would get force liquidated in a long squeeze. Shorts are up to 16K BTC, not enough (yet) to fuel a short squeeze.

This rally may still have legs.



2870. Post 12816721 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: wutizurkwest on October 29, 2015, 03:38:14 AM
I see the market finally made up its mind.  We were hovering around 2000 on Huobi and Okcoin, not sure if I'd call it resistance, the volumes were low, but some hesitation was expected.  Finally pushed through, paused at 2005, now seeing 2015-2020.  Where is the next major resistance, chart gurus?

What I don't understand is why there is a difference between the prices on these 2 exchanges and BTCC.  It's less than a percent, maybe enough that withdrawal fees are to blame.  But Bitfinex and Bitstamp are a good $10 lower than the exchange rate would suggest, even with fees factored in.  The last time I noticed a consistent spread between exchanges was with Gox.  I also don't believe the volumes on Huobi and Okcoin for a second, so I'm a little suspicious.

Good observation, Newbie.  If coins were being moved out of China, (to fund a ponzi or to evade capital controls) we would expect to see a differential like this. After all, what good is Chinese fiat on a Chinese exchange good for (to us) except to buy coins back when the spread is smaller? 



2871. Post 12817020 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: mavericklm on October 29, 2015, 04:56:52 AM


I was out for ~1week, what's up with this shoot to the moon?

Bitcoin is now the official national currency of Prussia.



2872. Post 12822181 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Coins that MUST be sold prior to the next ATH:

USMS seized coins
Australian Gov seized coins
Most of 200,0000 Gox coins to pay lawyers, investigators and forensic accountants
~$22 MM of leveraged longs on BFX







2873. Post 12822988 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

http://news.discovery.com/animals/whales-dolphins/orca-punts-seal-80-feet-into-the-air-151028.htm



2874. Post 12827671 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Leverage is piling up on both sides at BFX. I'm getting 0.12% daily interest on fiat. BTC lenders are getting ~0.06 or >10X what they were getting a week ago.

Something's gotta give. 





2875. Post 12827727 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

BTC shroters are paying 0,18% now DOUBLE what longs are paying. They are out of ammo. We're going up.



2876. Post 12827859 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: chmod755 on October 30, 2015, 05:34:23 AM
BTC shroters are paying 0,18% now DOUBLE what longs are paying. They are out of ammo. We're going up.

It looks like both shorts and longs got more expensive. You mean the highest paying short position pays .18%? The best offer on finex = .0625%, okcoin = .02%

it's changing very fast. over $24MM in dollar swaps, >20,000 BTC swaps. both growing fast, but BTC swaps growing at a faster rate. 



2877. Post 12827965 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

@ >20K BTC swaps, there is now enough or close to enough leveraged shorts to force a short squeeze.  Of course there has been enough leveraged longs to force a long squeeze since...the last long squeeze.

A margin call/forced liquidation cascade is an epic sight to behold. Fortunes are won and lost.  The safest way to play them is wait until just after it happens and then max leverage the opposite direction. if we do go significantly up, pay attention to the volume.  If positions are being force liquidated, the volume will go up dramatically.  A trickle up is not a trend reversal.  Reversals happen on high volume. 

Now whales could dump at any time, but they probably won't until those puts get force liquidated, but then afterwards they almost certainly will.  and then...look out below.  With all buying exhausted, we could go into free fall and get a long squeeze as margin bulls get the same treatment. 

We don't know how high this is going to go. Nobody does.  What we do know is that every leveraged long and short has to cover eventually, so expect high volatility.



2878. Post 12845130 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

The unknown amount of buying that is due to Chinese evading capital controls may lead to a similar amount of dumping on the other side. The question is whether or not bitcoin is a vehicle for value transfer  for them or a store of value.



2879. Post 12845623 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on October 31, 2015, 10:35:13 PM
China's like "Uh we're doing a bull pennant here guys, not this dumping crap"

32$ spread... They are going to the moon with our without western exchanges  Grin As we know, on the end western exchanges will follow. The only question here is how many people will get burned.

Has it occurred to anybody that the implied USD/CNY exchange rate on the Chinese exchanges may be the real rate and the official exchange rate at the forex market is the one being rigged?




2880. Post 12859863 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on November 02, 2015, 11:53:02 AM
Prepare to sell Hearn just went nuclear on the XT FUD, Core bashing in extremis ...

https://medium.com/@octskyward/on-block-sizes-e047bc9f830#.366dmgcto


He has well-reasoned arguments. Core deserves to be bashed.



2881. Post 12860058 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on November 02, 2015, 05:00:00 PM
Prepare to sell Hearn just went nuclear on the XT FUD, Core bashing in extremis ...

https://medium.com/@octskyward/on-block-sizes-e047bc9f830#.366dmgcto


He has well-reasoned arguments. Core deserves to be bashed.

A well-reasoned response:

https://medium.com/@btcdrak/full-of-lies-and-desperation-of-someone-who-risked-his-entire-reputation-on-something-and-lost-and-6c206e68d0cf#.i2wtg2uhv


This is not a reasoned response. Just one example:

"The Scaling Bitcoins conferences are not specifically about blocksize, but about how to scale bitcoin efficiently and without risk."

ALL change carries a certain amount of risk. To claim that NO risk is the standard, then you are advocating NO CHANGE just as Mike Hearn has claimed.

The relevant issue is whether or not the risk of increasing blocksize outweighs the risk of not doing so. The risk of waiting vs. the risk of acting in a timely manner. You should get the idea.



2882. Post 12860194 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: hdbuck on November 02, 2015, 05:22:18 PM

This is not a reasoned response. Just one example:

"The Scaling Bitcoins conferences are not specifically about blocksize, but about how to scale bitcoin efficiently and without risk."

ALL change carries a certain amount of risk. To claim that NO risk is the standard, then you are advocating NO CHANGE just as Mike Hearn has claimed.

The relevant issue is whether or not the risk of increasing blocksize outweighs the risk of not doing so. The risk of waiting vs. the risk of acting in a timely manner. You should get the idea.

you know nothing about risk, just the coupla dollars you 'invest' on btc when it was ath.

The bulk of my holdings were purchased between six and twelve $/BTC as you should know. You've been around long enough. 



2883. Post 12860215 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on November 02, 2015, 05:21:47 PM

This is not a reasoned response. Just one example:

"The Scaling Bitcoins conferences are not specifically about blocksize, but about how to scale bitcoin efficiently and without risk."

ALL change carries a certain amount of risk. To claim that NO risk is the standard, then you are advocating NO CHANGE just as Mike Hearn has claimed.

The relevant issue is whether or not the risk of increasing blocksize outweighs the risk of not doing so. The risk of waiting vs. the risk of acting in a timely manner. You should get the idea.

You are just making a semantic argument.  I'm sure BTCDrak did not mean literally entirely without risk, and no reasonable reader would interpret it that way.



Judging by his actions (or lack thereof), I am not convinced that he did not literally mean it. I'm being serious. 



2884. Post 12860272 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

If Core can't find a way to scale the network with a reasonable amount of safety and security in TWO YEARS, then they are incompetent and need to make way for better developers. 

How much time is a reasonable amount of time for you?  I really want to know. Give me an actual number.



2885. Post 12861253 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on November 02, 2015, 06:03:40 PM
If Core can't find a way to scale the network with a reasonable amount of safety and security in TWO YEARS, then they are incompetent and need to make way for better developers. 

How much time is a reasonable amount of time for you?  I really want to know. Give me an actual number.

That is a pretty bold statement about solving a non-trivial computer science problem.  I'm sure your patches will be accepted if you have a solution.

I think the problem is that you assume that increasing the blocksize fixes the problem.

I imagine a future where all manner of services that are currently ad-supported or subscription-based might instead be payed for with bitcoin microtransactions, seamlessly and transparently.  There could be millions, or maybe even billions of transactions per day from all these page views/minutes of video/etc. - vastly more than even Visa handles at peak capacity.  And add to that all the microtransactions that might be generated by devices on the Internet of Things, that none of us know the extent or nature of yet.

I don't see how increasing blocksize will handle this.  Even data-center sized nodes may not be able to handle all those microtransactions.

I don't claim to know what the answer is, but I am pretty sure that block-size alone won't do it - and lurching down that path in a non-judicious way could lead to permanent problems that will be painful to work around in the long term, after a real solution is found.

I'm certain blocksize alone WON'T fix all scaling problems, but it would buy us time. All it would take right now is a doubling of transactions to crash the network.  This problem was important, but now it's urgent as well. A doubling is well withing the realm of possibility in mere months and is approaching the probable. 

Creating a market for transaction fees needs to happen AFTER we reach mainstream adoption or we will never reach it. Yahoo mail, Facebook, Google all knew not to monetize too early.  That's why they're still around. I hope we'll be around when billions of cryto microtransactions becomes an issue.



2886. Post 12864809 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Chalkbot on November 02, 2015, 07:55:23 PM
Yeah... no coins left for sale at stamp is sort of a bad thing.

BFX won't run out of coins because ~$22MM worth of longs have to cover at some point.



2887. Post 12864954 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on November 03, 2015, 03:31:14 AM
Yeah... no coins left for sale at stamp is sort of a bad thing.

BFX won't run out of coins because ~$22MM worth of longs have to cover at some point.

What does this mean no coins left on stamp. Its order book is still bigger than Huobi.

as for BFX, are there really 22 million dollars in short sales on BFX? is there a chart for that you can link for me?

No, 22 million in US Dollar swaps. Leveraged longs on margin. These trades cannot bank a profit until the coins are sold. In the meantime they are paying interest (to me) on the loans.



2888. Post 12865223 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

So what happens when someone is leveraged 20Xlong and the price drops 5%?  A forced liquidation, which causes the price to drop another percent or two, causing more forced liquidations and so on. A margin call cascade can cause the price to plummet in hours.  Wiped out bulls have no money left to take advantage so it just keeps dropping. 

Hell, even I can't take advantage because my giant pile of fiat is lent out. 

So when does it finally stop? When bears cover their shorts. The problem is that there aren't enough bears left.  Many of them got wiped out in the pump. 

This kind of volatility is terrible for bitcoin. Money with a wildly fluctuating value is not very useful.



2889. Post 12865407 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Dilla on November 03, 2015, 04:34:18 AM
Bitcoin is finding its true value, which will take years. Until then, enjoy volatility. It's not going to steadily increase until Bitcoin finds its place in the world. It's going to be exponential growths and sell offs. This isn't horrible, just how things will go.

It won't have much of a place in the world @ 7 TPS.  That kind of capacity can only support ~605,000 people making one transaction per day.  I personally make about three blockchain transactions/day. 



2890. Post 12865447 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: lyth0s on November 03, 2015, 05:00:56 AM

Stop your whining and grow a pair. Millionaires can push the market much more than my small 20x leveraged long will do. If the entire future of bitcoin's value was subject to some traders deciding to go 20x long it would have already been destined to fail anyways. The technology is where the value is, not the current price or how people hedge around it.

Millionaires don't get to be millionaires by buying something that has already gone up 40% in a week.  They already bought if they're buying at all and now it's the dumb money pouring in.  there may well be enough greater fools for you to profit, but the technology is a network that has a SEVEN TRANSACTIONS PER SECOND LIMIT.  If any of these newcomers try to take their coins out of the exchange and do something with them, the network will crash.  604800 transactions/day max. 

I have a pair. Grow a brain.



2891. Post 12865540 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: lyth0s on November 03, 2015, 05:25:40 AM


Edit: "Millionaires don't get to be millionaires by buying something that has already gone up 40% in a week." --Do you think I got into bitcoin just this week?

We're not talking about you. We're talking about the millionaires that are supposedly going to continue the pump so you can profit off your 20X long.



2892. Post 12872978 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: keithers on November 03, 2015, 06:53:28 PM
It is super exciting looking at the 1 year chart, and seeing us coming close breaking the year over year price!!

Getting pretty damn close. Within ~4%.   



2893. Post 12873764 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: hd060053 on November 03, 2015, 07:40:45 PM
this shorter is going all in
What shorter? There's only 9300 BTC swaps on BFX. It's just a seller. 

BTW, thanks bulls. I just made so much money shorting today, that I can dump again if you wanna take another swipe at $420.




2894. Post 12874004 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: brg444 on November 03, 2015, 08:14:54 PM
this shorter is going all in
What shorter? There's only 9300 BTC swaps on BFX. It's just a seller. 

BTW, thanks bulls. I just made so much money shorting today, that I can dump again if you wanna take another swipe at $420.

So you opened you're just when exactly? When we busted through 380? 400?  Roll Eyes

I call BS

I started shorting @ $399 and kept shorting the whole way up.  I could have shorted twice as much, but after covering @$380, I know have enough to safely short Three times as much if we come anywhere close to $420 again.  I also transferred in some coins I was using for arbitrage just so I have some extra margin.

Try it again, Bulls. I double dare you.  See if I'm bluffing.   



2895. Post 12874129 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on November 03, 2015, 08:38:27 PM
this shorter is going all in
What shorter? There's only 9300 BTC swaps on BFX. It's just a seller. 

BTW, thanks bulls. I just made so much money shorting today, that I can dump again if you wanna take another swipe at $420.

So you opened you're just when exactly? When we busted through 380? 400?  Roll Eyes

I call BS

I started shorting @ $399 and kept shorting the whole way up.  I could have shorted twice as much, but after covering @$380, I know have enough to safely short Three times as much if we come anywhere close to $420 again.  I also transferred in some coins I was using for arbitrage just so I have some extra margin.

Try it again, Bulls. I double dare you.  See if I'm bluffing.   

dude you've really gone off the rails, sort yourself out.

first with all the big block crap and now this shorting shit ... you used to be a model bitcoiner, what happened to you?

Smallblockers happened to me. Scale or die.



2896. Post 12874223 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: AlexGR on November 03, 2015, 08:52:21 PM
Smallblockers happened to me. Scale or die.

Terabytes of blockchain that are to be filled with junk, with near zero cost, does not equal scaling but an open-wide attack vector to destroy BTC.

Then fuckin find a solution that works! I don't give a shit how it's done but it's got to get done.  Years and years to figure out a way and if they can't come up with a scaling solution, then either they are incompetent and need to be replaced or they are intentionally obstructing progress and need to be replaced.




2897. Post 12874786 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: oldm8 on November 03, 2015, 09:02:07 PM
this shorter is going all in
What shorter? There's only 9300 BTC swaps on BFX. It's just a seller. 

BTW, thanks bulls. I just made so much money shorting today, that I can dump again if you wanna take another swipe at $420.

So you opened you're just when exactly? When we busted through 380? 400?  Roll Eyes

I call BS

I started shorting @ $399 and kept shorting the whole way up.  I could have shorted twice as much, but after covering @$380, I know have enough to safely short Three times as much if we come anywhere close to $420 again.  I also transferred in some coins I was using for arbitrage just so I have some extra margin.

Try it again, Bulls. I double dare you.  See if I'm bluffing.   

dude you've really gone off the rails, sort yourself out.

first with all the big block crap and now this shorting shit ... you used to be a model bitcoiner, what happened to you?

Smallblockers happened to me. Scale or die.

You need some sleep but you wont be able to as the Chinese will be waking up in the next 30 mins and going crazy but seriously its been a tiring 24 hours

12 hrs from now, I'll have an extra $6500 available for shorting as my swaps will expire.  Let's hope the Chinese are as bullish as you say. 



2898. Post 12882401 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Do you know why nuclear explosions don't blow up the whole planet? Because the chain reaction needs a certain amount of heat to continue.  Yes, it's an awesome event, but it doesn't last long.



2899. Post 12883033 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: ImI on November 04, 2015, 01:40:42 PM
Do you know why nuclear explosions don't blow up the whole planet? Because the chain reaction needs a certain amount of heat to continue.  Yes, it's an awesome event, but it doesn't last long.

why so grumpy?

Well, I'm considerably upside down on my short, but I'm gonna let it ride.  Coins bought at auction tomorrow will get dumped if we stay anywhere near this high. Somehow I doubt it will stay this high. But then again, I've been wrong before.

Remember Remember the Fifth of November.




2900. Post 12883196 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

If you could buy enough coins @ $250 to dump at $500, then you could not only double your money in one day, but you could trigger a long squeeze of all you yahoos leveraged up 20 to 1 and then double your coin take.

If y'all want to reward the USMS for theft, fraud, and entrapment, then go ahead. I want no part of it.



2901. Post 12883273 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

So BFXdata.com is offline for quite some time. Could it be perhaps that someone is taking a massive long or short position that they don't want the rest of the market to see?




2902. Post 12883489 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: r0ach on November 04, 2015, 02:48:52 PM
There are only 14 million BTC out there, so if there were 15 million bitcoiners the average bitcoiner would have less than 1 BTC.  Since the distribution is highly skewed, most of those "bitcoiners" would have to own only 0.01 BTC or less.

There are only ~150'000 transactions issued per day, or ~4.5 million per month. If we count as bitcoiners only those people who issue a transaction at least once a month, there cannot be more than 4.5 million.  Again, most of the transactions are generated by a small number of users, so the number of bitcoiners is probably less than 450'000.

Wences is one of the worst snake bit-oil peddlers out there.  By talking about "1,000,000 $/BTC" as if it were an almost sure thing, he has definitely left the "salesman" land and crossed into "scam" territory.

Stolfi, you know damn well what you're typing IS snake oil.  Off-chain transactions (i.e. exchanges and other such services) probably make up a far higher percent of volume than on-chain transactions.  Nothing about Bitcoin being a preservation of wealth tool requires you to mindlessly send it back and forth to yourself all day long.  Bitcoin's current state lends itself to functioning best as a checkbook type device you use to occasionally buy large value items like cars and houses.

Wrong.

https://www.coinbase.com/charts



2903. Post 12883611 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: Richy_T on November 04, 2015, 02:59:21 PM
Do you know why nuclear explosions don't blow up the whole planet? Because the chain reaction needs a certain amount of heat to continue.  Yes, it's an awesome event, but it doesn't last long.

What? No. It's because there aren't enough unstable nuclei around to maintain critical mass.

You mean like unstable people paying $500 for something they could have gotten last week for $250?



2904. Post 12884931 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: Richy_T on November 04, 2015, 03:24:56 PM
If you could buy enough coins @ $250 to dump at $500, then you could not only double your money in one day, but you could trigger a long squeeze of all you yahoos leveraged up 20 to 1 and then double your coin take.

And if you could buy them at $25...

Problem is, there are other people who would want to do the same thing so you have to bid higher than them. Which means the only useful bid is one slightly below the actual price, just enough to make a profit.

And then anyone who wants actual coins will know this so they will bid higher than you. However, there's not much point bidding much higher than market unless you want a lot of coins without slippage.

So in all likelihood, coins will go for close to market price to someone looking to accumulate.



Yeah, but if you could manipulate the price lower the night before the auction, not only would you have no slippage, but you could get a substantial discount.  Buying slightly below an artificially low price covering your short and then you effectively get coins for free.  Not counting of course the risk that your manipulation fails. But in that event, you know the price is artificially high, so you could take your newly purchased coins and leverage them 20:1 short AFTER the auction and make a mint.

It is mathematically impossible for the graph to go straight up. Parabolic rises end violently.  I've been through enough of them to know.



2905. Post 12884984 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: inca on November 04, 2015, 04:56:59 PM
This feels A LOT like 2012 year's end / 2013 first months pre-bubble, climbing through $8, $10, $12, $26, those times we 'only' had about 200000btc in the ask side of GOX

But this time we have ummmm, let me see: 8500 in Finex, and about 6000 coins left in Stamp, should be extrapolate the order of magnitude of the next bubble?  Grin



Visible order book being the important point Smiley
Also don't forget the 9k shorts that need to be bought back with increasing urgency the higher the price rises.

Hopefully you are right though and this is a prelude to madness and mania.

off topic: by the way you aren't voktar the qw player are you?

and the 23 Million in USD leveraged longs? None of them are going to cover the rest of the way up?

at ~ $500/BTC, that's ~46,000 bull coins on margin.  only about 1/5th of them need to cover to completely cancel out the puts.



2906. Post 12889694 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Ahem,

Dear bulls. Dear sweet beautiful bulltards, Thank you so much for the lovely money.  I must admit, you gave it a good shot.  You almost had me. I had to post additional margin @ $480/BTC to avoid a forced liquidation. Allow me to be magnanimous in victory.  You see, I'm a fireman. When things get to hot, I cool them down. It's what I do.  Now I may be a blue collar guy, but I'm a professional.  I get paid to cool things down and today I got paid handsomely. Thank you for that. In return for your generousity, I invite y'all to kiss my working class butt.

Respectfully,

billyjoeallen, esq.

P.S. I you want to give it another shot, I'm your huckleberry.



2907. Post 12889787 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

On BFX, >40% of bears covered during the correction. <5% of Bulls covered.  It appears there is still significant irrational exuberance in the bovine camp.  Oh, goody.  There's just something about getting a margin call that focuses the mind.  When the Chinese counterattack tonight, I think I'll wait until I see the whites of their eyes before unloading my now much larger bazooka on them.  Y'all feel free to join in the fun.




2908. Post 12889814 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: Wolf Rainer on November 05, 2015, 12:38:06 AM
Ahem,

Dear bulls. Dear sweet beautiful bulltards, Thank you so much for the lovely money.  I must admit, you gave it a good shot.  You almost had me. I had to post additional margin @ $480/BTC to avoid a forced liquidation. Allow me to be magnanimous in victory.  You see, I'm a fireman. When things get to hot, I cool them down. It's what I do.  Now I may be a blue collar guy, but I'm a professional.  I get paid to cool things down and today I got paid handsomely. Thank you for that. In return for your generousity, I invite y'all to kiss my working class butt.

Respectfully,

billyjoeallen, esq.

P.S. I you want to give it another shot, I'm your huckleberry.

Finally the bears appears. Where you hided the last 2 weeks?  Grin

Unlike many of y'all, I actually go out and do what we colloquially call down hear in the swamp "work".  It's quite rewarding.  I highly suggest you try it. 



2909. Post 12889851 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: Flyskyhigh on November 05, 2015, 12:50:57 AM
Buying in Chinese Yuan, selling in USD. They aren't buying Bitcoin, they are just using Bitcoin to buy Dollars. To avoid capital controls.

And when the last coin leaves China, y'all better pray there's another totalitarian regime somewhere doing something equally evil and stupid or demand will dry up like a bull turd in the Mohave.



2910. Post 12889905 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: canth on November 05, 2015, 01:04:31 AM
Buying in Chinese Yuan, selling in USD. They aren't buying Bitcoin, they are just using Bitcoin to buy Dollars. To avoid capital controls.

And when the last coin leaves China, y'all better pray there's another totalitarian regime somewhere doing something equally evil and stupid or demand will dry up like a bull turd in the Mohave.

Is there really a time when a totalitarian regime isn't doing something equally stupid as implementing capital controls and currency manipulation? Rinse and repeat.

You have a fair point, but unless the poor wretched souls who reside in those godforsaken hellholes have something worth trading, how are they going to get the coins? There's not a big market for Venezuelan ponchos or whatever.  They do have literal boatloads of oil, so there's that, but I'm pretty sure the kleptocratic government nationalized that years ago.   




2911. Post 12890065 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 05, 2015, 01:26:59 AM
-snip-
We've all known for years that bitcoin would shine in crises. We've seen it proven a few times now.
Nothing new about it.
Impossible to predict and exciting to watch tho!

How do you mean? As in "ain't no way Danny Brewster or  Ukyo Jon or friedcat or TF or [...] could've sleezed away with millions in fiat, but Bitcoin really came through," that sort of shine?

Ya, so if you think you might need a million bucks in ransom in bitcoins at any point, well, get 'em while they're hot.

There are companies that make a business out of getting kidnapped people back. It may be wise for these companies to preemptively load up.  One of the least attractive features of bitcoin is that it facilitates kidnapping.  If they can prevent this, itmay be one of the few cases where the Bitcoin Alliance may actually do something useful.



2912. Post 12890104 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: AZwarel on November 05, 2015, 01:37:44 AM
The run up resumes  Wink nice volume, late night pump! Oh wait, late night in Europe Smiley

edit: wow +20$ in 1 minute

Yeah, the expected counterattack is starting early. I have to pull back my asks. Could even be a double top.



2913. Post 12890213 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Dammit, it's too early for this shit.  The Chinese are just waking up.  One of my bids missed by 11 fucking cents at the 366 bottom and now I have ten less coins to dump in the counterattack. 





2914. Post 12890242 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

I think the correction woke some of the Chinese up to the fact that they need to convert some coins back into fiat after they have expatriated their capital.  There should be enough coins on western exchanges or easily transferred by now to keep this from really going nuclear before the auction.  We'll see.




2915. Post 12891291 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

This may be the first real test of the MMM victims and perhaps many of the China expatriators.  Let's see how their nerves hold up.   

I gotta get some sleep. Two packs of cigarettes/day and four hours shuteye just ain't cutting it. 

I'm not too worried. The only people with any fiat right now are bears.  Look at it this way,  The USMS is going to get less $ for their ill-gotten gains.   



2916. Post 12891325 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

buy walls vanishing whenever the price gets close. 

C'mon, guys. You can make money on the way down, too.  Instead of catching a falling knife,  just wait for it to bottom out and then load up.   When the blocksize is >1MB, we can all go long max leverage with little fear, but a network that can only service about a half million people is not going to draw institutional investors.



2917. Post 12901343 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

There's not much blood on the streets...yet. Sometimes I wonder if smallblockers are intentionally hampering progress so they can buy as many coins as possible on the cheap.  Then sometimes I wonder if they just want to destroy bitcoin.

I'm not buying back in until it goes lower than the $260s where I sold most at and I don't care if it NEVER gets there.  I still have my cold storage stash. I can lend out my fiat with zero exchange rate risk.  I can keep the profits from my short on the MMM pump.

The only other reason I would buy back in is if blocks get larger than 1MB. Then I'm back in 100%, no matter what the price is.

Enjoy watching the value of your portfolios plummet, bulls.  If you get wiped out, blame the cripplecoiners.



2918. Post 12904975 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 06, 2015, 07:06:21 PM

if blocksize gets an issue it will be solved in 24h

its not a big deal, more a question of details

ideialy there wouldnt be this "blocksize" issue in the first place

but there is

so how do we deal with it

dealing with it by ignoring it until it actually start to mess shit up and then saying " that's fine! bitcoin was meant to be slow and costly, using the holly ledger is a privilege! " is wrong.

on ther other hand gavins proposal is equally ridiculous to the other extream.

i'm confident devs will implement a happy middle ground

On what do you base this confidence? Past performance? 



2919. Post 12905153 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 06, 2015, 08:27:17 PM

if blocksize gets an issue it will be solved in 24h

its not a big deal, more a question of details

i'm confident devs will implement a happy middle ground

On what do you base this confidence? Past performance?  

from what i see, the scaling conference, the open letter from devs, the on going discussion about it.

it seems pretty clear something will be done about it, extcal what and when is up in the air.

also what's encouraging is that there is still a lot of room for improvement in a few aspects of the protocol, after a little bit of study 2 months ago i concluded we could grow the network 250 times bigger without demanding more bandwidth than is currently being used, if all these improvements were rolled out. and from there i think 10-100 X increase in bandwidth requirements to run a full node isn't all that crazy, so from where i'm standing bitcoin can potently scale by a factor of 2500 - 25000 while still being very decentralized.

of course i'm probably being a little optimistic on these potential coding gains. but i ain't worried about scalability anymore.


There are legitimate philosophical differences on what type of network Bitcoin should be.  There are also political differences and it seems to me that someone behind the scenes is intentionally exacerbating these differences to prevent progress. Of course I have no evidence that is not circumstantial, but even if I am wrong, the failure of the various factions to find ANY common ground is cause for concern at the very least.



2920. Post 12905202 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 06, 2015, 08:22:07 PM


Don't count China out. 

I'm sure that there are plenty of bitcoin enthusiasts (or maybe some would call them speculators) who may be waiting for fairly clear signs of a trend reversal before they return to pumping (or buying) mode.

I WISH we could count China out. China is a giant wild card that makes fundamental analysis impossible within a reasonable degree of certainty.



2921. Post 12905445 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: hdbuck on November 06, 2015, 08:58:16 PM


as i already say, my 2 cents on the parabolic pump would be the fbi auction.
simple, and yes, these people have the means to manipulate whatthefuckever they want.

edit: just look at the chart, the pump is very well calibrated, almost perfection. only 'professionals' are the ones capable of such things.

If the FBI has the ability to manipulate the global price on our censorship-resistant network, then we really don't have a censorship-resistant network.



2922. Post 12905527 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: brg444 on November 06, 2015, 09:11:15 PM


as i already say, my 2 cents on the parabolic pump would be the fbi auction.
simple, and yes, these people have the means to manipulate whatthefuckever they want.

edit: just look at the chart, the pump is very well calibrated, almost perfection. only 'professionals' are the ones capable of such things.

If the FBI has the ability to manipulate the global price on our censorship-resistant network, then we really don't have a censorship-resistant network.

What does censorship have to do with price manipulation  Roll Eyes

I swear the shit you come up with...


A price signal is important communication. If that information is intentionally distorted, the signal is censored.



2923. Post 12905637 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

If you lack the capacity for abstract thought,  you may find the world confusing.



2924. Post 12905662 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 06, 2015, 09:30:47 PM
wtf i dont get why i get so much heat every time i suggest that improvements can be made and scalability can be overcome.

you trolls are paid by blockstream or something...

If scalability problems can be overcome, then why aren't they being overcome? That's the 64 billion dollar question.




2925. Post 12905709 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Full blocks are not going to come early next year. They're here now.  If a transaction fee market develops, good luck in EVER getting the 1MB limit raised.  Miners will grow dependent on the extra revenue stream.




2926. Post 12905857 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: ImI on November 06, 2015, 09:52:27 PM
Full blocks are not going to come early next year. They're here now.  If a transaction fee market develops, good luck in EVER getting the 1MB limit raised.  Miners will grow dependent on the extra revenue stream.



Yes, miners want more income through fees, but less transactions doesn't equal more income. You could have more transactions (more revenue) and less profit per transaction but in the end higher profit. Its a question of balance.

In other words the logic smaller blocks = higher mining profits doenst work. Otherwise you could choose a 50kb blocksize, but i am sure thats not what miners want.

You are preaching to the choir, Brother.  I could go even further and add that the block reward will be greater if the price of BTC goes up, which is more likely with larger network capacity, but it's not me you need to convince.



2927. Post 12905902 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: mr angry on November 06, 2015, 10:03:49 PM

Every now and again there are blocks mined with no transactions included in them. Whoever mines them doesn't care about the transaction fees, they only want their 25 Bitcoins for mining a block. Zero transactions = more profit for them. The rest of the blocks mined have varying numbers of transactions, but some are close to the 1 MB limit. If the number of transactions doubles a solution will be forced on the community.

There are several solutions that exist already, but there is no agreement on which one or whether to implement them. The incentive to agree on a solution will be greater, but it's pretty damn big already and far from finding common ground, the various factions are becoming more entrenched in their positions.

The rough consensus governance model has a flaw that is getting more obvious by the day.



2928. Post 12906432 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

I wonder who bought @$504.  Based on BFXdata.com it  likely wasn't a short-seller being forced liquidated.

A parabolic rise is not sustainable. It's mathematically impossible for the graph to go straight up. 




2929. Post 12906735 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on November 07, 2015, 12:39:24 AM
Panic sellers done dumping to the accumulators?

The accumulators already bought.  Bulls don't have any fiat left to spend. 



2930. Post 12906775 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on November 07, 2015, 12:45:17 AM
Panic sellers done dumping to the accumulators?

The accumulators already bought.  Bulls don't have any fiat left to spend. 

They have plenty of fiat from dumping the parabola. You think the bears had that many coins?


You mean like Adam, who bought back @ $420?



2931. Post 12906780 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on November 07, 2015, 12:47:33 AM
Panic sellers done dumping to the accumulators?

The accumulators already bought.  Bulls don't have any fiat left to spend. 

You do know you're a bit late to the bear party?

I'm not a permabear. I'll switch back as soon as the first block gets mined >1MB.



2932. Post 12907433 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 07, 2015, 02:55:53 AM
Any property belonging to the Government of Brazil rightly belongs to you? That must be a magical place to live.

That is how *I* see it, and what the Constitution is supposed to say.  That is how you should see it in your country too. 

Unfortunately, as in your country, there are many, many government officials who steal my property, or mismanage it, or deny my rights to it.  Of course I resent it.  I try to fight those abuses by protesting and voting, and hope that enough other Brazilians will do the same.

Quote
I guess housing isn't really an issue.

A large majority of us Brazilians have agreed to let the government use some of our common property for certain uses, like schools, roads, parks, etc.  I approve such arrangements in principle; in some of those that I disapprove, I am willing to submit to the majority; and in some others I protest and vote agains, as above.

Howz that protesting and voting working out for ya, Prof?



2933. Post 12907454 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 07, 2015, 02:42:32 AM
The Economist predicts transactions could take over an hour by early next year if there's no change. Are they wrong?

That is nonsense.  Someone with no idea of how things work just tossed a number.

Once the average traffic (transactions issued per day by all users) exceeds the effective capacity of the network (about 240'000 tx/day, 2.8 tx/s), there will be a steadily growing backlog of unconfirmed transactions.  There will not be a fixed delay: the average delay will keep increasing, day after day.

If the traffic were to be 300'000 tx/day (3.5 tx/s), for example, the backlog would grow at the rate of ~60'000 tx per day (~0.7 tx/s).  The transactions received in one day will take 300'000/240'000*24 = 30 hours to be confirmed; so the average delay for 1-confirmation will keep growing by 6 hours every day.  

If the transactions were serviced first-in, first-out, then all transactions sent in the same hour would be delayed by about the same (but always growing) number of hours.   Since the processing priority is largely determined by the fees paid, however, some transactions may be processed in the next block, independently of the backlog, while others will be delayed even more than they would with the fair policy.   However, there will be no way to estimate the fee needed to get your transaction confirmed in the next block, or within X hours; because that depends on the fees of transactions that will be issued before your confirmation -- by clients who will want their transactions to be processed before yours.

But that regime cannot last for long, of course.  Clients will give up on bitcoin, until traffic drops below the capacity -- say to 220'000 tx/day (~2.6 tx/s). Then, part of the time, there will be no backlog: all transactions will confirm in the next block, even if they pay the minimal fee.  However, the traffic varies a lot depending on time of day and day of the week.  During peak hours and peak days, the traffic will be quite a bit more than 2.8 tx/s. Then there will be a temporary backlog, lasting several hours, that will be cleared slowly when the traffic subsides.  

As before, the backlog and the average confirmation delay will keep growing while the traffic exceeds the capacity.  The delay for your transaction, specifically, will depend on its fee, on the transactions that are waiting in the queue, and on the transactions that will be issued by other clients until your transaction is confirmed.  On some occasions, many transactions may get delayed by several hours, perhaps by a day or two.

That would be an ideal time for someone to launch a competing coin.  I figure it would take <$1 Billion to overcome Bitcoin's first mover advantage and then the banksters will just keep running the world as if we never existed. 



2934. Post 12907517 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: hdbuck on November 07, 2015, 03:31:54 AM
...

That would be an ideal time for someone to launch a competing coin.  I figure it would take <$1 Billion to overcome Bitcoin's first mover advantage and then the banksters will just keep running the world as if we never existed.  

lmao you really should lay off whatever you are tripping on.


You think it would take less or more?   Surely you know that it's possible at some number with the right technical design and promotion.  You seem to be not understanding what's at stake here.



2935. Post 12907570 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 07, 2015, 03:46:23 AM
...

That would be an ideal time for someone to launch a competing coin.  I figure it would take <$1 Billion to overcome Bitcoin's first mover advantage and then the banksters will just keep running the world as if we never existed.  

lmao you really should lay off whatever you are tripping on.


You think it would take less or more?   Surely you know that it's possible at some number with the right technical design and promotion.  You seem to be not understanding what's at stake here.
it would take broad consensus amongst the community that this altcoin is the new future of money.

i mean they can pump there coin all they want, all they really do is create a very large honey pot no one dare touch.

??   our entire market cap is a fraction of what Facebook paid for Whatsapp.  They don't need our community at all.  All we're doing is their test marketing and technical research for them. A few tweaks, a few power players (in finance, not crypto) backing, and they capture everyone who wants low cost electronic cash without all the anarcho-capitalist drug market baggage. Oh yeah, and it'll scale.



2936. Post 12907593 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: hdbuck on November 07, 2015, 03:58:56 AM
...

That would be an ideal time for someone to launch a competing coin.  I figure it would take <$1 Billion to overcome Bitcoin's first mover advantage and then the banksters will just keep running the world as if we never existed.  

lmao you really should lay off whatever you are tripping on.


You think it would take less or more?   Surely you know that it's possible at some number with the right technical design and promotion.  You seem to be not understanding what's at stake here.
it would take broad consensus amongst the community that this altcoin is the new future of money.

i mean they can pump there coin all they want, all they really do is create a very large honey pot no one dare touch.

??   our entire market cap is a fraction of what Facebook paid for Whatsapp.  They don't need our community at all.  All we're doing is their test marketing and technical research for them. A few tweaks, a few power players (in finance, not crypto) backing, and they capture everyone who wants low cost electronic cash without all the anarcho-capitalist drug market baggage. Oh yeah, and it'll scale.






I don't really understand your scorn.  If you don't want bitcoin to be the future of money, then what do you want it to be?  I don't mind a certain amount of arrogance, but only if you have the chops to back it up. As it stands, you're a cunt hair away from getting blocked.



2937. Post 12907599 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 07, 2015, 04:00:34 AM
A large majority of us Brazilians have agreed to let the government use some of our common property for certain uses, like schools, roads, parks, etc.  I approve such arrangements in principle; in some of those that I disapprove, I am willing to submit to the majority; and in some others I protest and vote agains, as above.

Howz that protesting and voting working out for ya, Prof?

Not very well, but considering that I am minority in many aspects, and the depth of corruption and crime in the country, it could be worse.  I got the President that I voted for, in the last 4 elections, and was rather happy with the results.  I got a mayor, but he was murdered shortly after taking office.  I got a federal congressman but he was jailed after his term ended, for having put a banker in jail for a few hours. 

But it still a lot better than when the military decided what was best for all of us.


That's a pretty low bar to set, isn't it? "Come to Brazil! It's not currently a military dictatorship."



2938. Post 12907664 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 07, 2015, 04:17:35 AM
I don't expect the fees to rise significantly.  After some initial mega-jams, things should settle down with the average traffic somewhat below the capacity (say, 2.6 tx/s, as in my example).   In that state,  the minimum fee will usually provide confirmation within a day, and confirmation in less than 1 hour will usually be achieved with relatively modest fees.   The traffic will not increase further because of the unpredictable delays, which will occur even if everybody ends up paying 100 $/tx of fees.

I wonder what's going to happen to the price during these megajams. By which I mean I wonder if it will fall, drop, plummet or crash.  Gox took us to the moon because BTC was the only exit. OTOH, if FIAT is the only exit, it's reasonable to assume the reverse will happen.



2939. Post 12907693 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 07, 2015, 04:27:05 AM


Well, bitcoin is not to be used for ordinary e-commerce payments...


Why not?




2940. Post 12907905 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 07, 2015, 05:01:51 AM
Well, bitcoin is not to be used for ordinary e-commerce payments...
Why not?

That is the stated Blocksrteam/small-blockian view: bitcoin should be used only for large-value settlements between institutions, like the Lightning network hubs -- not for ordinary e-purchases by ordinary citizens.

I know that, but that is because of certain technicalconstraints.  If Bitcoin could scale without jeopardizing its security, and censorship resistance, why would they not want it to be used for e-commerce?
It just doesn't make sense. It's one thing to argue that there are technical limits and trade-offs. It is quite another to argue that, given solutions to these issues, they wouldn't want to implement them.  

An ideal cryptocurrency would be infinitely scalable, instant, completely censorship resistant and inexpensive to use, right?  So we should make bitcoin as close to that as possible, right? It's as if they think consumers exist to serve producers instead of the other way around.  That is a basic economic fail.  




2941. Post 12908313 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

regarding blocksize limit: let's say you we're looking at buying a Ferrari. The car has a 10 MPH governor on  it that cannot be removed without voiding the warrantee. Would you buy it? What would be the point? It's just a really expensive golf cart. 

But at some price level, you would buy it, say "screw the warrantee", pull off the governor, and drive it anyway. That price would have to be substantially lower than  MSRP.






2942. Post 12908478 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: Holliday on November 07, 2015, 06:45:10 AM

Bitcoin should be used primarily for transactions where capital controls or other forms of monetary censorship exist.

Censorship is everywhere. Ever heard of legal tender laws? 

Quote

This, however, is my view.  There is simply no reason to use censorship-proof money for ordinary purchases. It's a terrible waste of resources for starters. A decentralized system has no reason to compete with centralized systems. They each do different things well. Using Bitcoin to buy goods from Amazon is like using a chainsaw to mow your lawn. Yeah, a chainsaw will certainly cut grass, but there are much better tools for the job.

All transactions do not need to be censorship-proof in a world where censorship-proof transactions exist. The possibility of censorship-proof transactions by itself will cut down on censorship because it will be seen as futile. So, it's important that any decision to change Bitcoin be considered in this light, and it's imperative not to make changes which move in the opposite direction (such as drastically increasing the amount of data needed to be shared in order to keep the network functioning).

They don't make laws against murder because they think it will prevent all murders.  They don't see such laws as futile because they are not 100% effective.  If they can restrict and reduce behavior they don't like, they don't see that as futile. 

A network that can only support ~ half a million active users will not mean zip diddly shit in a world of 7 Billion people.  The "drastic" increase in data shared is completely in line with technical advancements in bandwidth and hardware.  Your argument is so foolish it makes me question your sincerity.

What's worse, a network that only supports censored transactions will bring down the wrath of the Establishment upon us. It NEEDS ordinary commerce or we will be persecuted.








2943. Post 12908588 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Let me put this another way:

I bought bitcoin because it never even occurred to me that it wouldn't scale.  Many new users don't know now that it doesn't scale, but when we run up against the hard limit and your beloved transaction fee market kicks off, everyone will know and nobody likes paying high fees for something they are used to getting nearly free.

The investors/speculators are the only reason this thing works at all.  You are taking us for granted.  We do not exist simply to facilitate drug deals.  WE buy the coins. WE supply the liquidity. If you don't give us what we want, we invest elsewhere.  Without us, nobody pays the miners and everything grinds to a halt.




2944. Post 12908632 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 07, 2015, 07:39:07 AM
That's a pretty low bar to set, isn't it? "Come to Brazil! It's not currently a military dictatorship."

Brazil is far from being the best country in the world, but it is still better than average, I dare say.  It is big and varied enough for you to find a niche of your liking.  (Unless you crave for skiing, kangaroos, salt flats, bears, cranberry sauce, volcanoes, sandstorms, yetis, tornadoes, edelweisses, or earthquakes; you will have trouble finding those here.)  Quite a few Americans and Europeans who come here love it enough to stay.

I'm sure it's beautiful, but I would guess most of the Americans and Europeans don't move there because of your enlightened governance.  They move there DESPITE the governance.



2945. Post 12908726 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on November 07, 2015, 07:44:01 AM

1MB4EVA is not being proposed as a serious technical solution. On h/ware improvements alone capacity will grow but how to implement that in a secure algorithm is the challenge, given the myriad of parameters and delicate balance of the existing competing incentive structure.

It would not surprise me that after all the work that is going on now for secure transactions anchored in main chain, but off-chain, that it turns out blocks wont be demanded by the market to be much bigger at all. Highly distributed networks scale securely best self-similarly, not monolithically (simply bigger blocks is a monolithic approach, so likely wrong) and "big" is a temporally-relative term that is near to impossible to encode in network rules that need to persist for decades.

I don't have to be an expert to recognize technobabble when I see it. You're like a crooked mechanic telling me I need my muffler bearings changed and my headlight fluid topped off.  It's too late for fucking blocktrees or whatever.  We're getting full blocks NOW. You think 8MB is drastic but you want to do something even more radical?  Like replacing the blockchain with trees or multiple chains?  Is that your idea of being careful?

It must take a genius to be that stupid.



2946. Post 12908950 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on November 07, 2015, 08:03:57 AM


Kind of off-putting to see all this "demanding" by the users ... if you want something build it. This is not the customer-supplier relationship that has been sold to you by Gavin, Hearn and the data-mining crowd. They want something from you for providing "convenient solutions, easy answers and goodies", your financial privacy. It is the same thing Google and Facebook and etc did to the web. Provide the goodies for free and meanwhile they pipe your humanity out the back-door.

Do you not know how economics work? The users are the reason everyone else's role exists. Miners are nothing without us. Core devs are just employees.  We own it.  Google and Facebook give their customers what they want. That's why they are still around and so many others are not.  I will not be held hostage by my employees.  I will sell as soon as a competitor appears who is more sensitive to my desires. 

Unbelievable fucking arrogance.  It's worse than the goddamned cable company.



2947. Post 12913331 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: Mota on November 07, 2015, 10:43:56 AM

Let me put this another way:

I bought bitcoin because it never even occurred to me that it wouldn't scale.  Many new users don't know now that it doesn't scale, but when we run up against the hard limit and your beloved transaction fee market kicks off, everyone will know and nobody likes paying high fees for something they are used to getting nearly free.

The investors/speculators are the only reason this thing works at all.  You are taking us for granted.  We do not exist simply to facilitate drug deals.  WE buy the coins. WE supply the liquidity. If you don't give us what we want, we invest elsewhere.  Without us, nobody pays the miners and everything grinds to a halt.


I  tend to agree, as more and more users become aware that Bitcoin doesn't scale, combined with frustrating user experiences of txs getting stuck, and txs becoming more and more expensive, for sure a part of the users will turn away from Bitcoin. It will make the price drop, since most of it comes from the future expectations of Bitcoin.

Of course, if LN is up and running before it plays out like this, and it doesn't degrade the user experience, Bitcoin won't fall off the cliff.  However, the Core client devs take quite a risk by taking Bitcoin hostage like this. I know I'll vote with my feet. Once I see evidence of the downward spiral, I'll sell my stash. I bet I won't be the only one, and the option of another cryptocurrency taking over becomes a very real possibility.

Because one thing is sure, cryptocurrencies are here to stay.

This discussion is getting annoying. Of course people who pay no transaction fees are getting stuck, but that is not a cause for greater blocksizes. You think you have the power because you buy bitcoins? You do NOT pay the miners, the system does. It's actually your attitude that is pretty arrogant, not the other way around. Do you know what would happen when the miners decide to cut back their hashing power? I do. VERY few blocks found for a LONG time! You have to realize that mining is not cheap, and miners do require those fees more and more since block rewards diminish. https://blockchain.info/de/charts/network-deficit  
The times when people were willing to get negative balances for their mining are long gone, the market regulates itself.


Are you retarded? What is the mental deficiency here? Ok, how about basic math, that should be uncontroversial, right?  A block reward of 25 BTC with BTC trading at $300 or a block reward of 12.5 BTC with BTC trading at $800----which is greater, Einstein?? 

Which is greater, 10 xaction fees of $1 each or 50 xaction fees of $0.25?

WE PAY THE MINERS BECAUSE WE DETERMINE THE PRICE WE ARE WILLING TO BUY AT. Why is it so hard to get such a simple concept into your thick motherfucking skulls?

The miner compensation argument for smaller blocks is complete and utter bullshit. If you can't see that immediately, then you are either an idiot or a liar.





2948. Post 12913443 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: rtrtcrypto on November 07, 2015, 01:53:25 PM
My analysis is much simpler:

1)

If MMM is a huge part of this recent rally = DOWN
If MMM is not a huge part of this rally = UP

2)

If block sized limit solved in DEC = WAY UP
If not = DOWN

1+2 go positive = short term MOON SHOT

if both negative = DOWN

Tracking the price of this sized market from charts and trying to read/fortune tell upcoming moves = waste of time.

I agree with your analysis.



2949. Post 12913466 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 07, 2015, 12:13:49 PM
I'm sure it's beautiful, but I would guess most of the Americans and Europeans don't move there because of your enlightened governance.  They move there DESPITE the governance.

Well, some come here BECAUSE of the governance:

Ronnie Biggs

William Frederick Koch

Josef Mengele

 Grin Tongue

It's good that you can keep your sense of humor about it. I wouldn't know whether to cry or run like hell.



2950. Post 12933766 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Multiple winning bidders of USMS aution all win with bids considerably under spot. Each one wondering if the other is going to dump. What would you do? Dump first and lock in profits or roll the dice?



2951. Post 12933785 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: r0ach on November 10, 2015, 12:28:13 AM
Multiple winning bidders of USMS aution all win with bids considerably under spot.

And where's the evidence of how much they paid?

I'm assuming. Consider it a hypothetical question.



2952. Post 12934750 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on November 10, 2015, 12:35:57 AM
BillyJoeAllen are you taking payments from any other people, organisations or entities to shill/push various positions, opinions on these boards?

No, but i would say that no matter what, right?

 



2953. Post 12941698 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

So auction coins never get dumped for a quick profit, huh? 

If I'm a paid troll, I wish someone would pay me. Oh, wait! Bulls ARE paying me.



2954. Post 12955774 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Current US dollar strength is due to deleveraging. If net outstanding debt is being payed back, then the fractional reserve money multiplier runs in reverse.  Debts that default also reduce the money supply. 



2955. Post 12955944 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on November 12, 2015, 01:11:52 PM
Current US dollar strength is due to deleveraging. If net outstanding debt is being payed back, then the fractional reserve money multiplier runs in reverse.  Debts that default also reduce the money supply. 


Why was the Euro EVER worth so much....?

What magic is going on that allows the Reserve to deposit trillions into bank accounts but there is no inflation?

anything is only worth what a buyer is willing to pay for it.  You could say there was relatively higher USD expected inflation. You could argue it was the expected efficiency gains by unifying Europe under a single monetary standard and the efficiency gains of free trade. It's very complex and there's no way to really know exactly.

as for "magic", there is no magic. The Fed is fighting DEFLATION which would be worse (or better depending on your perspective) without ZIRP and quantitative easing.



2956. Post 12955975 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: galdur on November 12, 2015, 01:19:33 PM
Current US dollar strength is due to deleveraging. If net outstanding debt is being payed back, then the fractional reserve money multiplier runs in reverse.  Debts that default also reduce the money supply.  


Why was the Euro EVER worth so much....?

What magic is going on that allows the Reserve to deposit trillions into bank accounts but there is no inflation?

A rising dollar imports deflation into the U.S. obviously. Unfortunately for the U.S. it also exports inflation (making exports less competitive) but that´s not really a big deal since the most important products are weapons, porn, hollywood crap and of course dollars.

that's correct. A big factor is all the neomercantilist emerging economies are blowing up, doing more or less the same thing Japan did 20 years ago. This puts a downward pressure on commodity prices everywhere and that ripples through the economy. For example, I'm an oilfield trucker getting paid almost nothing but there is no upward pressure on wages because there are more drivers than loads with WTI crude at $42/bbl.



2957. Post 12956070 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: galdur on November 12, 2015, 01:36:04 PM
Current US dollar strength is due to deleveraging. If net outstanding debt is being payed back, then the fractional reserve money multiplier runs in reverse.  Debts that default also reduce the money supply.  


Why was the Euro EVER worth so much....?

What magic is going on that allows the Reserve to deposit trillions into bank accounts but there is no inflation?

A rising dollar imports deflation into the U.S. obviously. Unfortunately for the U.S. it also exports inflation (making exports less competitive) but that´s not really a big deal since the most important products are weapons, porn, hollywood crap and of course dollars.

that's correct. A big factor is all the neomercantilist emerging economies are blowing up, doing more or less the same thing Japan did 20 years ago. This puts a downward pressure on commodity prices everywhere and that ripples through the economy. For example, I'm an oilfield trucker getting paid almost nothing but there is no upward pressure on wages because there are more drivers than loads with WTI crude at $42/bbl.


There´s one pretty major drawback in this dollar rise which the stock market doesn´t seem to be concerned about for some reason. A rising dollar means that U.S. multinationals (those big international dogs that lead the market) get to book fewer dollars as revenue and profits back home in the U.S. It´s lagging but has to hit stock prices sooner or later.

That's true but it may take a while. When it's looking bad everywhere, capital flows to the lepers with the most toes.  If you a're fund manager were a hedge had a billion or so to invest right now, where would you park it?  Bonds? interest rates are too low and default risks make them almost as risky as stocks. As JM Keynes said, "markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent".



2958. Post 12956110 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: galdur on November 12, 2015, 01:43:24 PM
But it may not mean that much. After all financial services account for a whopping 36% of the total market cap of the U.S. stock market. Is that staggering or what?  Grin

That's almost all a deadweight loss in efficiency. We now or soon will have the technology to replace every stockbroker and investment bankster with software.  BUT, we have this little scaling problem....



2959. Post 12956179 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: galdur on November 12, 2015, 01:53:29 PM

BTW, I noticed that The Donald´s book is on the torrents. Audiobook. What the hell is it called again , Lame America?
No, it´s that other word

Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again, by Donald J. Trump.

Trump apparently doesn't really understand macroeconomics, but if he gets elected and bans remittances to Mexico, Bitcoin will do well. 

actual quote:  "I'm 100% a free trader, but we need better deals."



2960. Post 12956207 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: galdur on November 12, 2015, 02:02:24 PM
But it may not mean that much. After all financial services account for a whopping 36% of the total market cap of the U.S. stock market. Is that staggering or what?  Grin

That's almost all a deadweight loss in efficiency. We now or soon will have the technology to replace every stockbroker and investment bankster with software.  BUT, we have this little scaling problem....

Yeah and imagine the gigantic interests in this obsolete industry, there´s 8-9 trillion dollars in stock value and then there´s real estate and other assets and armies upon armies of vastly overpaid personnel. Not to mention that they fund politicians, appoint the president´s administration and much more. Gonna take decades and maybe a world war to cut that mess down to the desperately needed size.

Agreed. There will need to be a change from a consumer-based economy with depreciating currency to a savings-based economy and that will not occur without major disruptions.



2961. Post 12956414 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Asrael999 on November 12, 2015, 01:19:16 PM


I have two keys to a locker that may or may not contain 24 billion dollars - how much are they worth? Scarcity does not equate to value.

No, but scarcity is required for something to be a commodity. For example air is valuable but it is not scarce so it's not a tradable asset.

scarcity: a neccesary but not sufficient property



2962. Post 12956464 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on November 12, 2015, 02:32:47 PM


If the dollar stays as it is, it seems there is no end to this ponzi. A ponzi never dies, ever, as long as you have a never ending line of people to join and you can print money for free. Ponzi schemes collapse when nobody joins.

Ponzi schemes collapse when FEWER join than is needed to pay existing participants.
There's an end because there's a finite pool of potential suckers.  The ponzi has to grow FASTER than the pool.
There's an end just like there's an end to cancer cell reproduction-either when the cancer is removed or when the patient dies.

You need to understand: it's not just a dollar ponzi. it's a fiat ponzi. The dollar will be among the last to fail.



2963. Post 12956525 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: makeacake on November 12, 2015, 02:36:45 PM
^
Scarcity also doesn't have to be artificial: Pork bellies are a commodity, and, AFAIK, there's no limit to how many piglets a pig family can birth.

There is a limit based on gestation time.

Which is why I argue so passionately that we don't need a blocksize limit.  We already have the propagation factor. The risk of orphaned blocks puts a natural limit to blockspace scarcity.

It will also be necessary to have more xactions/block when the block reward is near zero. More xactions=more xaction fees.  Miners need to be compensated or the network becomes less secure.



2964. Post 12956617 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Asrael999 on November 12, 2015, 02:32:19 PM

That's more like it, many of those are good reasons for bitcoin to have value - and all better then "Bitcoin is scarce" which is easy and fundamentally lazy. Yes if Bitcoin can be used to do things that add value then it has value, and the finite number of bitcoins increases its value if more than that many are in demand, but first it must be used to do things - and the more those things are developed the better.
Owning 1 bitcoin equates to owning access to 100,000,000 entries on the blockchain (or lockers) - the more each entry can be used for (the more types of stuff I can put in a locker) and the more people want to access the lockers the more each bitcoin is worth.

The ~7TPS limit means that it may take a longer time to open each locker and if excessive xaction fees are required, then you have much less than 100,000,000 entries.

So it may mean that the stuff (colored coins, timestamps, etc) that you can put in the locker won't matter because there are other lockers on other chains that could be more useful. All smallblockers are doing is giving bitcoin's competitors time to catch up.



2965. Post 12956645 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on November 12, 2015, 02:55:38 PM
All you fools waiting for sub-300 should probably buy back in NOW.

You should be happy we're not buying back in now. There would be nobody with fiat left to halt the plunge in the event of a major dump.



2966. Post 12956786 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: makeacake on November 12, 2015, 02:58:41 PM
^
Scarcity also doesn't have to be artificial: Pork bellies are a commodity, and, AFAIK, there's no limit to how many piglets a pig family can birth.

There is a limit based on gestation time.

Which is why I argue so passionately that we don't need a blocksize limit.  We already have the propagation factor. The risk of orphaned blocks puts a natural limit to blockspace scarcity.

It will also be necessary to have more xactions/block when the block reward is near zero. More xactions=more xaction fees.  Miners need to be compensated or the network becomes less secure.

You're clearly not a pig farmer Cool
'Gestation time' is a meaningless limit, x1000 production is trivial if there's demand for pigs.

In other words, scarcity of certain commodities is simply a function of demand.

so, to be precise, there is a limit, it's just very high and not likely to be lower than demand.  However say, it's discovered that eating twenty pig eyeballs/day cures heart disease, cancer and gives you a 12 inch penis, then that gestation limit would be relevant.



2967. Post 12956817 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: AlexGR on November 12, 2015, 03:11:55 PM
One of the safest assumptions is that adoption and use will increase - unless something catastrophic happens.

something catastrophic like a successful rough consensus attack?

http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-August/026151.html




2968. Post 12956888 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Richy_T on November 12, 2015, 03:24:38 PM
As JM Keynes said, "markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent".

The words of a gambler gone broke.

from wikipedia:

Quote
Keynes was ultimately a successful investor, building up a private fortune. His assets were nearly wiped out following the Wall Street Crash of 1929, which he did not foresee, but he soon recouped. At Keynes's death, in 1946, his net worth stood just short of £500,000 – equivalent to about £11 million ($16.5 million) in 2009. The sum had been amassed despite lavish support for various good causes and his personal ethic which made him reluctant to sell on a falling market in cases where he saw such behaviour as likely to deepen a slump.[153]

That's broke? Keynes was a seriously flawed economist, but give credit where credit is due.



2969. Post 12956950 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: makeacake on November 12, 2015, 03:27:44 PM
all you have to do to increase pig production is ...breed more sows, instead of butchering them.
And those sows will birth 5 sows, and those five will birth 25, 125, etc., etc.

Come on. You can't even imagine a scenario where demand outstrips potential supply? What if aliens demanded we give them a huge and ever increasing number of pigs to feed their exponentially growing space empire?
A ridiculously high limit is still a limit.



2970. Post 12957015 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Richy_T on November 12, 2015, 03:35:42 PM
That binary view holds only if payout is predetermined, not managed/variable (as is the case with fiat currencies/economies). A 'ponzi' like that stays in a state of constant flux, so it's not even clear what's meant by 'collapse.' People get poorer? Die? World implodes?

The BRICs countries get fed up of getting screwed by the fed and create their own currency, for example.

Possible but unlikely. If they were that smart, they wouldn't be playing catch-up. Or more accurately, if their rulers were more honest, which they clearly aren't. Cartels don't last, because any profit above the free market level is just added incentive for individual cartel members to defect.  How has OPEC kept oil prices high?  oh, that's right, they haven't.

It's just too tempting for rulers to steal from subjects via inflation.

real world example: The Euro.  If Europe can't come up with a currency to successfully compete with the dollar, what makes you think third world kleptocracies will?



2971. Post 12957161 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: makeacake on November 12, 2015, 03:46:39 PM
all you have to do to increase pig production is ...breed more sows, instead of butchering them.
And those sows will birth 5 sows, and those five will birth 25, 125, etc., etc.

Come on. You can't even imagine a scenario where demand outstrips potential supply? What if aliens demanded we give them a huge and ever increasing number of pigs to feed their exponentially growing space empire?
A ridiculously high limit is still a limit.

If the demand is high enough, pigs will be bred in penthouse bathtubs, planets will be colonized, made habitable, and turned into pig farms.
What I'm trying to say is there's no artificial scarcity, no hard limit of 21 million, as is the case with bitcoin and Beanie Babies.
As I said, scarcity, in this case, is simply a product of demand, as in "I can't make more money by breeding more pigs."

Only if time is not a limiting factor. If a pig farmer Get's a fill-or-kill order for a million pigs and he has a month to fill it, and he has only two breeding pigs, then it doesn't matter how much the buyer is willing to pay.




2972. Post 12957336 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on November 12, 2015, 04:10:53 PM
all you have to do to increase pig production is ...breed more sows, instead of butchering them.
And those sows will birth 5 sows, and those five will birth 25, 125, etc., etc.

Come on. You can't even imagine a scenario where demand outstrips potential supply? What if aliens demanded we give them a huge and ever increasing number of pigs to feed their exponentially growing space empire?
A ridiculously high limit is still a limit.

If the demand is high enough, pigs will be bred in penthouse bathtubs, planets will be colonized, made habitable, and turned into pig farms.
What I'm trying to say is there's no artificial scarcity, no hard limit of 21 million, as is the case with bitcoin and Beanie Babies.
As I said, scarcity, in this case, is simply a product of demand, as in "I can't make more money by breeding more pigs."

Only if time is not a limiting factor. If a pig farmer Get's a fill-or-kill order for a million pigs and he has a month to fill it, and he has only two breeding pigs, then it doesn't matter how much the buyer is willing to pay.

Please refer to the red, bold text. ty.

Actually there IS a hard limit.  What has not yet been pointed out in this conversation is that producing more pigs is not free, and as your pig production increases, costs will increase as well, at some point exponentially.  And at that point lies your hard limit.



at first there are economies of scale, that make each additional pig LESS expensive to produce than the previous pig. But eventually the economies of scale get reversed because land for pig farms gets more scarce, pig slop has to be made out of lobsters, etc.




2973. Post 12957368 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: GGALINff on November 12, 2015, 04:17:32 PM
when people start basing their arguments on "all the in the universe"    time to hit the bottle

what's next?  in all of the universes?

good point. Pig production is limited by the amount of matter in a FINITE universe.



2974. Post 12957526 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Richy_T on November 12, 2015, 04:35:04 PM
when people start basing their arguments on "all the in the universe"    time to hit the bottle

what's next?  in all of the universes?

good point. Pig production is limited by the amount of matter in a FINITE universe.

I think this argument has gone off the rails. I think it might be better served by using "inelastic supply" rather than "scarcity".

(Though there's a 37% chance that muddies things even further)

Right. It's important to ask "how elastic is inelastic?" It's not binary.  An economist always has to ask "as compared to what?"  Elastic supply relative to demand with demand being variable.



2975. Post 12957586 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Richy_T on November 12, 2015, 04:40:48 PM

It has, awhile ago. I initially simply meant to point out that scarcity != artificial scarcity. Trivial stuff, not sure why people raise such a ruckus Undecided

It depends. They can be equivalent in some circumstances. The artificial scarcity introduced by copyright allowed companies to charge very high prices for music and movies.

You seem to be missing the point of the whole discussion. Artificial scarcity results in artificially high prices given a constant demand. Artificial scarcity can reduce demand if the higher prices make an alternative relatively more attractive.



2976. Post 12957602 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 12, 2015, 04:44:59 PM
once we've established a clear upward trend, coin-scarcity will go up exponentially, we are at the very beginnings of this happening.

>500 is no longer a sell signal

are full blocks, higher xaction fees and six hour confirmations a sell signal?



2977. Post 12957733 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 12, 2015, 04:56:52 PM
once we've established a clear upward trend, coin-scarcity will go up exponentially, we are at the very beginnings of this happening.

>500 is no longer a sell signal

are full blocks, higher xaction fees and six hour confirmations a sell signal?
no the implementation of the solution to these self imposed limitation and subsequent market reaction (32,000$), is the sell signal.

the implementation is the buy signal and we haven't gotten it yet...if ever.

Imagine if confirmation time slows to a crawl, kind of like the delay in fiat withdrawals at Gox.  With the BTC exit blocked instead of the fiat exit, we get a gox bubble in reverse.

It's just too big of a risk to take. I already bought a lottery ticket this week. Waiting for a miracle to happen is not a sound investment strategy.



2978. Post 12957792 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on November 12, 2015, 05:12:37 PM
once we've established a clear upward trend, coin-scarcity will go up exponentially, we are at the very beginnings of this happening.

>500 is no longer a sell signal

are full blocks, higher xaction fees and six hour confirmations a sell signal?
no the implementation of the solution to these self imposed limitation and subsequent market reaction (32,000$), is the sell signal.

the implementation is the buy signal and we haven't gotten it yet...if ever.

Imagine if confirmation time slows to a crawl, kind of like the delay in fiat withdrawals at Gox.  With the BTC exit blocked instead of the fiat exit, we get a gox bubble in reverse.

It's just too big of a risk to take. I already bought a lottery ticket this week. Waiting for a miracle to happen is not a sound investment strategy.

I think you are inventing fear and using it to either slay your own dreams or those of others. WE can imagine disasters all day the bottom line is I can pay a large mining fee of a whole dollar and my transfer moves instantly....

what is your real point

it's not mere imagination. It an extrapolation of current trajectory.  Nobody hopes I'm wrong more than I do.



2979. Post 12957854 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on November 12, 2015, 05:16:38 PM

Transactions mean absolutely nothing, nobody transacts in Gold EVER. Bitcoin is asset protection and remittance above all else. Transactions day to day are at least 10 years away, and i am pretty sure will be nothing like what they are now, probably not even in this blockchain.

I love your second point though it is exactly right.



Gold would have to appreciate by 74% to be at it's 2011 valuation. That's a very poor argument for holding BTC with no xaction value.



2980. Post 12958213 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: AlexGR on November 12, 2015, 06:06:15 PM

Transactions mean absolutely nothing, nobody transacts in Gold EVER. Bitcoin is asset protection and remittance above all else. Transactions day to day are at least 10 years away, and i am pretty sure will be nothing like what they are now, probably not even in this blockchain.

I love your second point though it is exactly right.



Gold would have to appreciate by 74% to be at it's 2011 valuation. That's a very poor argument for holding BTC with no xaction value.

Again, it depends where you live.

If you are in India, which is an extremely large holder of gold, and people deal with gold all the time, your national currency used to buy 1 USD with 45 INR in the start of 2011. Now you need 66 INR to buy 1 USD.

What this means, if you are living in India, is that if you dumped your INR for gold (which hundreds of millions do - something that is unimaginable for us, westerners), your fiat "losses" in your national currency are much different than those of an American.

To say that gold is a better investment than Ruppees is not an argument for gold. It's an argument against Ruppees.  Anything looks good compared to something worse. A bitcoin that can buy more blockspace is more valuable than a bitcoin that can buy less blockspace, because it's not just for BTC xactions. It's for timestamps, colored coins, anti-spam email, immutable data, etc.



2981. Post 12958345 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: AlexGR on November 12, 2015, 06:27:20 PM
To say that gold is a better investment than Ruppees is not an argument for gold. It's an argument against Ruppees.  Anything looks good compared to something worse.

When you have to store your wealth, and you live in a "developing" country with foreign exchange issues, capital controls, or even gold restrictions or taxes to prevent you from dumping your national currency in order to buy the X or Y hard asset, your options are limited.

This is the reality of billions of people around the world and it's an argument in favor of "sound money" compared to confetti* fiat. Naturally money will find its way towards gold, silver, btc.



* Even in the US and EU, our money is not even worth the metal it is printed on. 1c coins are zinc. In Europe it's even worse. 1c/2c/5c are all iron (steel).

Iron FFS Huh

And they plate it with a thin layer of copper to make it appear valuable.

I'm not arguing against sound money. I agree with you as long as it's the market that determines the standard and not the State. I'm arguing against small blocks and the flawed notion that transaction utility is not important.



2982. Post 12958421 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Gold became the world standard because it was more TRANSPORTABLE than silver or other alternatives for a given value. Small blocks specifically and a lower network capacity generally make bitcoin less transportable.

Gold is less transportable than dollars and is losing value relative to dollars. Transportability matters. Transaction capacity matters. 



2983. Post 12959219 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: aminorex on November 12, 2015, 07:31:32 PM
Gold became the world standard because it was more TRANSPORTABLE than silver or other alternatives for a given value. Small blocks specifically and a lower network capacity generally make bitcoin less transportable.

Gold is less transportable than dollars and is losing value relative to dollars. Transportability matters. Transaction capacity matters.  

Gold became a reserve currency for that reason.  Silver was ever the dominant transaction currency for the opposite reason.

Silver is very interesting to me, as is platinum.  PMs should bottom between today and next Tuesday.  This is a deep extension of a pattern which should have reversed earlier this week, but did not.  My monkey is much better with PMs than with crypto.  He claims that PMs will make a significant move up over the next two weeks, as a minor correction to a major downtrend lasting until at least late December.  Since this coincides with my fundamental view that gold is doomed with the oil glut - Saudis can't afford gold; wheat is their new gold - but I am not a buyer of wheat until late next week - and only seasonal fuel oil demand or an international political change can interrupt that, I am very much inclined to bet with the monkey on this one.

In the long run, industrial uses of silver and platinum give them a natural floor of support which gold lacks.  Moreover, declining copper prices mean declining copper mining, which implies less silver on the market.  (Silver/platinum is mostly a side-product of copper/gold mining.)

nope, it's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gresham%27s_law bad money driving out good. Bimetallism was not two currencies competing. It was price control. Now silver is better thangold  for microtransactions, because it is easier to transact in small values, but that is not an issue when a unit is divisible by 100,000,000. 

I don't have a problem with using an altcoin for microtransactions or using side chains to reduce blockchain bloat, but that shouldn't be an issue for at least a few orders of magnitude.  I can download the whole chain on my phone now for crying out lout.



2984. Post 13119456 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Has there been any news to go with this retracement?  My guess is that there was too much optimism about a consenus on BIP 101 as the blocksize solution.



2985. Post 13119815 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

so I'm getting a new node computer that I plan on running XT or BIP 101 with.  Cybermonday at Dell.com gave me a 4GB refurbished 1.6 GHz desktop WITH monitor and shipping for $118!

And yes, 1TB hard drives cost less than a carton of cigarettes now so all you smallblockers griping about the "burden" of blockchain bloat can find something else to whine about. Your days are numbered.

I also bought three C.H.I.P. computers for $30 shipping included. If I can configure them into XT nodes, I'l buy about a dozen more.



2986. Post 13119927 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Elwar on December 01, 2015, 12:47:20 PM
so I'm getting a new node computer that I plan on running XT or BIP 101 with.  Cybermonday at Dell.com gave me a 4GB refurbished 1.6 GHz desktop WITH monitor and shipping for $118!

And yes, 1TB hard drives cost less than a carton of cigarettes now so all you smallblockers griping about the "burden" of blockchain bloat can find something else to whine about. Your days are numbered.

I also bought three C.H.I.P. computers for $30 shipping included. If I can configure them into XT nodes, I'l buy about a dozen more.

Don't install the version of XT with the tracking list included.

You can easily disable the tracking. I plan on doing just that.



2987. Post 13125045 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

If y'all are pickin' two cars, one of em's gotta be a pickup truck.  Chevy Silverado 2500 4x4 is about as good as they come.  I am in agreement however on the sports car. The Jerry's make 'em better than anybody. A high end Audi or Porsche is the way to go.



2988. Post 13138929 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Watching Mario Draghi on the idiot box: "the bonds will stay on our balance shit."

Honesty from a central banker.



2989. Post 13140056 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 03, 2015, 01:59:18 PM
i just wokeup to 10K emails saying " ANXPRO.COM Security Notification - Login Failure "  Cheesy

they seem to be coming in at about 1 pre seconds

 it's likely a brute force attack on your password.



2990. Post 13140094 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: TReano on December 03, 2015, 02:40:29 PM
Watching Mario Draghi on the idiot box: "the bonds will stay on our balance shit."

Honesty from a central banker.


Well they have to try everything to get inflation going... The current system desperately relies on inflation. It's not good or bad it's just how it is.


 

The system desperately relies on continuing something that is unsustainable. There is a limit to how much credit expansion you can stimulate.



2991. Post 13166887 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

I'm watching the Scaling Bitcoin speakers and the infosec guys don't quite seem to grasp economics in the same way most people get econ wrong. They don't seem to understand that it is a specialized field as much as infosec is and requires base assumptions different than what is commonly understood. 

Total mining reward = (blockreward+transactionfees)*exchange rate

The added benefit of marginally higher transaction fees is dwarfed by the other two factors in the equation. What this means is that The incentive to selfishly mine very large blocks is LOWER than the risk of those blocks being orphaned most of the time.

Large miners have more of an incentive to selfishly mine large blocks than small miners, nut--and here's where economics comes in--Miners AND investors don't just care about competition, we also care about POTENTIAL competitors enough to affect our behavior.  A network that is at or nearing capacity can potentially lose market share to one that isn't. A miner selfishly mining big blocks runs the risk of competitors joining together to orphan those blocks as well as new big miners wanting in on all the easy money. 

Cartels don't work in the free market in the long run because the greater the reward for anti-competitive behavior, the greater the incentive for individual cartel members to defect. This is why OPEC is selling oil for $40/BBL.  It's why labor unions (labor cartels) are dying in the private sector and only growing in the public sector. 

The only way cartels CAN work ultimately is for there to be some kind of artificial enforcement mechanism such as BIP100 or "intellectual property" law. 






2992. Post 13191481 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

I'm just contemplating on when would be the best time to drop the short hammer with my six figure tradeable balance.  Keep it up, bulls. You're going to get a smack down you haven't seen in months.

Also, I got my $118 XT node up and online. Downloading the blockchain now.  How ironic that the smallblockers actually have aided in decentralization by pissing me off this much. I haven't run a node in years.



2993. Post 13191590 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 09, 2015, 06:40:36 AM
billyjoe, y so mad bro?

I want my big blocks.  I want to show the world that we really have an antifragile network that is capable of adapting to new demands. I want users to come first, not miners. not developers. not middlemen.



2994. Post 13194458 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: oda.krell on December 09, 2015, 10:58:21 AM
I'm surprised. It looks like this time, even some of the veterans in here tend to believe the Satoshi revelation story, that Wright = Satoshi.

Granted, the Wired/gizmodo article and research behind is somewhat better than that awful Newsweek "Look! Same last name!" story, but aside from that: whatever hard evidence Wired has (or has revealed so far) is rather flimsy as well. As far as I can tell, the major documents containing proof of identity either cannot be verified (cryptographically, say), or haven't been verified (by some indirect method).

All in all, I see very little strong evidence, and mainly just a man whose reaction to the Wired story is consistent with someone who could be Satoshi. But in that case, motivation matters, and it's rather funny how it only seems to cross a few peoples' minds that somebody might actually want to be believed to be Satoshi. The crypto nerds mainly seem to focus on the "He just wants his privacy!" angle, so somebody possibly trying to take credit for Satoshi's work doesn't seem to fit in.

Last observation: Wright's style doesn't pass the sniff test. From the soundbites and writing samples I've seen, there's a big difference between Wright's and Satoshi's style -- the latter's phrasing and argument development being rather modest sounding, never boasting -- which means I personally want to see a lot more hard evidence -- i.e. documents constituting proof of identity between the two, that also have been shown to be authentic and non-tampered with -- before seriously considering that Satoshi has been identified.

I agree for the same reasons outlined. Write has apparently written many white papers so it should be relatively easy to compare formatting, styles of writing, etc.  The personality difference makes this candidate questionable at the least.



2995. Post 13195994 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Cassius on December 09, 2015, 03:51:24 PM
The Craig Wright thing doesn't add up. There's supposed to be a tx of 1.1m BTC. Where is it on the blockchain and why are Satoshi's coins still where they always were?

https://bitscan.com/articles/something-about-the-new-satoshi-isnt-wright

I'm trying to find another explanation and the only ones I can come up with are
1) Someone else has 1m BTC
2) The doc is fake

Yeah, this reminds me of the fake Mormon will of Howard Hughes.  He knows he can't access the coins, but if he gets anyone to believe he can, he could pledge them for collateral to a loan.  This is really strange because Bitcoin is probably the easiest asset to prove you truly control. Just sign something with your private key. Frauds are so easily sniffed out with just the minimum amount of due diligence. You almost have to WANT to be fooled in order to get defrauded.



2996. Post 13196395 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

On BFX, it's almost as if someone pumped ~$5,000,000 to $10,000,000, just to gain a quick 5% and then dumped again. 

A successful P&D like that is likely to be repeated, but the question  is will it be for a higher buy in price, lower, or the same? 

I think it's likely that it was for considerably more money and performed on multiple exchanges simultaneously.  or it could just be the sum of many players acting independently. It's fun to think about.



2997. Post 13196571 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: chesthing on December 09, 2015, 05:00:49 PM
On BFX, it's almost as if someone pumped ~$5,000,000 to $10,000,000, just to gain a quick 5% and then dumped again. 

A successful P&D like that is likely to be repeated, but the question  is will it be for a higher buy in price, lower, or the same? 

I think it's likely that it was for considerably more money and performed on multiple exchanges simultaneously.  or it could just be the sum of many players acting independently. It's fun to think about.

Well, since you were threatening to do this with your 6 figures of bitcorns, I'd say you are a likely suspect.


No no no. I have a tradeable balance of over $100,000. But even that is with max leverage. I'm only playing with ~1 years salary. The bulk of my holdings are in cold storage.  I WISH it was me. That would have been quite a windfall.



2998. Post 13196664 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

I'm thinking at this point that Segregated Witness should be implemented after testing but Garzik's kick-the-can 2MB limit implemented immediately.  Combined, that should buy us a year before further blocksize increases may be necessary.




2999. Post 13196719 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Frost on December 09, 2015, 05:20:42 PM
So, is the crash near?

Yes, but I don't know if it's going to be a BTC crash or a fiat crash.



3000. Post 13197599 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Zerohedge has an article on the "stealth devaluation" of the Renmimbi. Reportedly at its lowest value since 2011. It might have something to do with the China pump. I don't see what makes an extremely volatile inflation hedge so attractive, but hey, I don't know what their other options are.



3001. Post 13201321 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Alley on December 09, 2015, 09:41:13 PM
220,000 transactions in last 24 hours.  To me this is the real indicator bitcoin is going mainstream.

To me this is an indicator that we're going to hit the 1 MB limit before resolving the scaling issue. We're over half maximum capacity. If the network bogs down, people on the exchanges will turn to the only exit left: fiat. It will be Gox in reverse. Worldwide on every exchange. 

Low fee transactions could take days to confirm. Zero fee xactions may never confirm. And what if some exchanges are running a fiat fractional reserve? They would have to liquidate BTC holdings to fill withdrawal requests, pushing prices down farther. Leveraged longs hit a margin call cascade. Miners forced to sell a larger percentage of mined coins to pay for electricity. 

Nothing's been fixed. Nothing. 600,000 xactions/day could create a backlog that will never clear. Companies with business models that depend on low fees could dump everything and cut their losses.

You'd better pray we get the capacity up before we grow much more or we could crash so far that we lose first mover advantage and never recover. Don't think there aren't people waiting, wanting and actively working to make that happen.




3002. Post 13201355 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 10, 2015, 12:22:12 AM
Over the rally from $350 to $425, the bid walls on bfx steadily grew from 35k to 41k. Now suddenly they are down to 31k. Speculations?

Welcome back!  My guess is there is hidden support the bid walls don't show and we're going to push higher, but I'm not confident enough to go farther long.

I really missed you. What's your take on the blocksize controversy?



3003. Post 13201384 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 10, 2015, 05:09:54 AM
220,000 transactions in last 24 hours.  To me this is the real indicator bitcoin is going mainstream.

To me this is an indicator that we're going to hit the 1 MB limit before resolving the scaling issue. We're over half maximum capacity. If the network bogs down, people on the exchanges will turn to the only exit left: fiat. It will be Gox in reverse. Worldwide on every exchange.  

Low fee transactions could take days to confirm. Zero fee xactions may never confirm. And what if some exchanges are running a fiat fractional reserve? They would have to liquidate BTC holdings to fill withdrawal requests, pushing prices down farther. Leveraged longs hit a margin call cascade. Miners forced to sell a larger percentage of mined coins to pay for electricity.  

Nothing's been fixed. Nothing. 600,000 xactions/day could create a backlog that will never clear. Companies with business models that depend on low fees could dump everything and cut their losses.

You'd better pray we get the capacity up before we grow much more or we could crash so far that we lose first mover advantage and never recover. Don't think there aren't people waiting, wanting and actively working to make that happen.



... smells like a ripe opportunity, you should build a business to meet all this unmet demand you are predicting and make some serious bank. Say a lightning hub or sidechain for  inter-exchange transactions?

It's one thing too see a need and an opportunity to profit in meeting it. It's quite another to make everybody sick before selling them the cure.  



3004. Post 13201492 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 10, 2015, 05:27:36 AM
Quote
It's one thing too see a need and an opportunity to profit in meeting it. It's quite another to make everybody sick before selling them the cure. 

oh, i see you are in the conspiracy camp, I guess I should have known by your toxic tone on this issue.

How about you are just slow to the punch in recognising the technical limitations that network operates inside of and others, how shall we say, weren't so slow? And now it just looks like ugly envy and sour grapes manifesting as a political power struggle.

The limitations aren't technical. They're political.  Why would I be envious of parasites? Bitcoin was supposed to free us from people like that.



3005. Post 13201553 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 10, 2015, 05:35:05 AM
Low fee transactions could take days to confirm. Zero fee xactions may never confirm.

Sounds like it will finally work like it should be.

The blockchain is too valuable a resource to be wasted by zero and ridiculously low fee txs.

And it's not only scaling but usability too. If I have a 100mb block size and it takes me a couple of hours just to sync the last day or a day to sync the last week (before I send a payment), will this be usable? Or will people say, ah yes, now you lost the ability to run bitcoin-qt, just use a thin client...

That's either stupid or dishonest. Nobody is proposing 100 MB blocks and won't unless bandwidth gets much much greater. The design is for block reward to subsidize miners until the network grows big enough to be supported on fees. How is that possible with ~ half million xactions/day? 

This is supposed to be a peer to peer network for the people, not <1 million elitists, criminals and middlemen.



3006. Post 13201596 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 10, 2015, 05:50:26 AM
here comes Mike Hearn's little free shit peed-in-my-pants panic derp army ... sheesh, when will you guys ever get half a clue?  Roll Eyes

or how about posting some code to gihub with unit tests, math, simulations and well-reasoned arguments? ... nup, just we duh wunt mah-big-blocks massah.

Hearn and Gavin already did that.
got my XT node up and running. It should have the whole chain downloaded by the time I get home from work.



3007. Post 13201656 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

How big would Facebook or Google be if they tried to sell advertising their first year?  Smallblockers want to monetize too early, before we really even get off the ground. It's short-sighted.

We need new users now, fees later. Much later. 



3008. Post 13201969 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 10, 2015, 06:16:45 AM

I've always known btc had a lot of technical quirks that require either a fork or the continuation of Moore's law or both. The blocksize of all things, at first impression, seems like one of the more minor issues that could be solved with some kind of fork.

You'd think so, wouldn't you? The problem is that there is ideological as well as technical reasons both for and against any scaling solution/change. There isn't anything close to a consensus and network traffic keeps growing.  Some are even hoping to overload the network in order to create a market for xaction fees. IMHO, that's madness that could catastrophically retard growth and adoption. 

It's just a huge uncertainty that is difficult to price in.   




3009. Post 13207812 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 10, 2015, 01:54:28 PM
Low fee transactions could take days to confirm. Zero fee xactions may never confirm.

Sounds like it will finally work like it should be.

The blockchain is too valuable a resource to be wasted by zero and ridiculously low fee txs.

And it's not only scaling but usability too. If I have a 100mb block size and it takes me a couple of hours just to sync the last day or a day to sync the last week (before I send a payment), will this be usable? Or will people say, ah yes, now you lost the ability to run bitcoin-qt, just use a thin client...

That's either stupid or dishonest. Nobody is proposing 100 MB blocks and won't unless bandwidth gets much much greater. The design is for block reward to subsidize miners until the network grows big enough to be supported on fees. How is that possible with ~ half million xactions/day? 

This is supposed to be a peer to peer network for the people, not <1 million elitists, criminals and middlemen.

We have different interpretations of stupidity.

When I have a system that has a hole in it (bloat in blockchain through low or no fees, that can be abused as an attack vector and kill bitcoin usage and adoption in the long run), I will not go and make it larger so that someone else can sink my boat. *That* is stupidity.

Scaling is not an issue right now. Not the processing of transactions. If you want to make a legitimate transaction, you'll pay a normal fee and you'll be processed in one block.

If you enlarge the block before scaling becomes an issue, then you open the attack vector wide open for further abuse (because it is already abused with over half the transactions being dust and spam). This is beyond idiotic.

I believe when the time comes, and the need is real, the block size can be increased. If it doesn't, there will be just some fee competition that prevents a lot of low and very low value tx. So what? This is certainly the lesser of the two evils involved here.

So the vulnerability as you see it is that people can throw money at you? You don't feel safe unless you're wearing a money-proof vest?  A money-proof vest that weighs 100 pounds?  Yeah, I'd say we do have different definitions of "stupid".



3010. Post 13208375 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on December 10, 2015, 08:43:05 PM
So the vulnerability as you see it is that people can throw money at you? You don't feel safe unless you're wearing a money-proof vest?  A money-proof vest that weighs 100 pounds?  Yeah, I'd say we do have different definitions of "stupid".

the only stupid around seems to be you, given your self-contradicting issues. If Tx are going to be free or almost free, who's going to make a buck of it?

Anyone spamming the network with dust is going to have to pay fees unless they run the risk of not getting confirmed. Miners don't have to include feeless xactions in their blocks. So basically a spam attack amounts to throwing money at the network.  That's a weird vulnerability.

As for who makes a buck, the miners who get the fees from the dust. Nobody else makes money, but users SAVE a buck by making (nearly) free xactions.

Worrying about blockchain bloat when the whole damn thing can fit on a microSD chip is either stupid or disingenuous. You should be worrying about how our project is only getting 200,000 transactions/day six years in.  You should be worrying about how <0.1% of people who know about bitcoin actually use it.



3011. Post 13208414 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 10, 2015, 08:45:55 PM
Low fee transactions could take days to confirm. Zero fee xactions may never confirm.

Sounds like it will finally work like it should be.

The blockchain is too valuable a resource to be wasted by zero and ridiculously low fee txs.

And it's not only scaling but usability too. If I have a 100mb block size and it takes me a couple of hours just to sync the last day or a day to sync the last week (before I send a payment), will this be usable? Or will people say, ah yes, now you lost the ability to run bitcoin-qt, just use a thin client...

That's either stupid or dishonest. Nobody is proposing 100 MB blocks and won't unless bandwidth gets much much greater. The design is for block reward to subsidize miners until the network grows big enough to be supported on fees. How is that possible with ~ half million xactions/day? 

This is supposed to be a peer to peer network for the people, not <1 million elitists, criminals and middlemen.

We have different interpretations of stupidity.

When I have a system that has a hole in it (bloat in blockchain through low or no fees, that can be abused as an attack vector and kill bitcoin usage and adoption in the long run), I will not go and make it larger so that someone else can sink my boat. *That* is stupidity.

Scaling is not an issue right now. Not the processing of transactions. If you want to make a legitimate transaction, you'll pay a normal fee and you'll be processed in one block.

If you enlarge the block before scaling becomes an issue, then you open the attack vector wide open for further abuse (because it is already abused with over half the transactions being dust and spam). This is beyond idiotic.

I believe when the time comes, and the need is real, the block size can be increased. If it doesn't, there will be just some fee competition that prevents a lot of low and very low value tx. So what? This is certainly the lesser of the two evils involved here.

So the vulnerability as you see it is that people can throw money at you? You don't feel safe unless you're wearing a money-proof vest?  A money-proof vest that weighs 100 pounds?  Yeah, I'd say we do have different definitions of "stupid".

The vulnerability is that one can make bitcoin unusable and centralized through a very low cost attack vector if the block size is increased.

I wouldn't mind large blocks (even 20mb) if there was an adequate fee structure in place that prevents abuse.

Let's say I'm the US government and want to shut down BTC... what kind of attack vectors do I have?

Some examples:

a) Built an expensive NSA farm to get the 51%. Doable but it will cost me a few hundred millions. The reward would be to wipe off competition for the USD.
b) Bribe or hack centralized mining systems that tend to have lots of hashpower.
c) Coordinate attacks that allow a 51% attack to go through by preventing others from hashing.
d) Start stealing people's private keys through the use of monitor equipment in people's hardware (that would 'burn' that option from future use, and make it publicly known)
e) Make various DDOS / DOS attacks that have low cost
f) Bloat BTC to infinity, if BTC allows itself to be bloated in this way (and it will with large blocks), again at very low cost. Thus it will become difficult to download, adoption will be hampered and you get it to a much more centralized and vulnerable point.
g) Accumulate or confiscate stashes of BTC to manipulate price and through market manipulation, destroy the BTC market. You can also "use" various exchange owners after they get an offer they cannot refuse ("please cooperate or else you'll be thrown in jail for decades with charges of assisting money laundering").
h) Do mass damage to unsuspecting people and then claim it's BTC's fault, so you need to ban it. Stuff like mass hacking of PCs, encrypting their data and blackmailing people. Or media attacks, association with criminal activities etc etc.
i) Ban it, but then it will flourish elsewhere. So you pressure various governments to do the same. But, that too, shows desperation and panic so it's better not to ban it and go more "subtly" about it (GOTO other attack vectors).

- stuff like that.

(f) is an avoidable attack vector.

Your forgot the rough consensus attack which is to divide the community and prevent consensus on necessary upgrades.



3012. Post 13208671 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 10, 2015, 09:12:32 PM
Worrying about blockchain bloat when the whole damn thing can fit on a microSD chip is either stupid or disingenuous.

It can fit because it has a 1mb limit in place, and not, say, 20mb. It would require just 50 blocks to fill 1 gb if someone made a script to do just that.

You cannot have a multibillion dollar currency that has such an issue looming over its head.

If you have a currency where someone can throw 1 btc in fees to fill a 20mb block, then with 144btc spent you get around 3gb of bloat per day.

In a month you will need 4320 BTCs to fill 86.4gb, and in a year you'll have exceeded 1 TB for a cost of 51840 BTCs (21mn USD at current prices, much less in terms of USD if the government has hacked them or confiscated them).

Even if one is paying the fees, and is not basing his approach on waiting to confirm a lot of low fee or no fee transactions, the price is way too low for destroying a multibillion dollar currency / making it unusable / rendering it centralized.

If I were threatened by BTC and had the resources, I'd go for it. It's pretty cheap compared to what you get in return (a bloated system and the perception that "ah crap, crypto is done, it can't scale because it's way too bloated). What more could I say? Roll Eyes

What we *really* need is to fit way more transactions in the same amount of space. And we also need a much higher fee structure, implemented ...yesterday if possible.

Are you trolling? That's a dumb argument.
 1) a 20MB block would not automatically mean all new blocks would be 20MB. We have a 1 MB limit now and most blocks are less than half that.
2) a large block runs the risk of getting orphaned because it propagates slower than a smaller block.  Miners know this and have an incentive to keep them small regardless of what the upper limit is.

You want a higher fee structure yesterday? Apparently you were sick the day they taught economics in economics class.  You don't gain business by raising prices, especially in a highly competitive environment. That's how you LOSE business.



3013. Post 13208781 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on December 10, 2015, 09:32:11 PM
So you're saying... don't use bitcoin then? Great! Scale bitcoin by not using it!

don't use it for crap, like ads/spam, dice with 0,0000000001 tx, and so. Do you trade physical gold daily? Me neither.

It's not a peer-to-peer electronic gold system. It's by design a peer-to-peer electronic CASH system. There may come a time when microtransactions will need to be off chain, but that time will never come if we don't get a critical mass of users first.



3014. Post 13208892 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on December 10, 2015, 09:52:09 PM
It's not a peer-to-peer electronic gold system. It's by design a peer-to-peer electronic CASH system. There may come a time when microtransactions will need to be off chain, but that time will never come if we don't get a critical mass of users first.

Gold is money. Everything else is a scam.

That's an assertion, not an argument. Money is simply the most marketable (liquid) commodity. In many languages the word "silver" is a synonym for money. It's the thing that eliminates the need for a double coincidence of wants. Using altcoins is basically the same as going back to barter. That's taking money backwards, not forwards.



3015. Post 13209374 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 10, 2015, 10:12:50 PM

When someone leaves their house, don't they lock the door? The answer is yes.

If one leaves their house they have less than 0.01% of their house being broken into. YET THEY LOCK THE DOOR.

By your rationale it would be dumb to do so... "just because one left their house doesn't automatically mean that his house will be broken into, I mean look at the statistics of how few times this has happened!!!".

If there was a gang of thieves prowling the neighborhood with most doors unlocked who were targeting houses with locked doors on the suspicion that those houses had more valuables, then it would increase not decrease your risk.

That may be a stretch to imagine, but I have to work with your metaphor. The point is that we have to judge RELATIVE risks.  That is not only not a fallacy but is prudent.  There is a risk associated with larger blocks. I'm not denying that. But we are not even having a meaningful discussion if you refuse to admit that there are risks associated with NOT allowing bigger blocks. 

What we have to do is weigh the risks and see which one is greater.  If you are not willing to do that, then I have to assume you are not even arguing in good faith and the only appropriate response to you is ridicule.




3016. Post 13209470 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 10, 2015, 10:29:11 PM
Bitcoin has already demonstrated functionality with 2 of the 3 main uses of money;

1) medium of exchange (Bitcoin the value transfer network)

2) store of value (bitcoin the currency)

When the medium of exchangers are in the ascendancy the network gets abused, value goes down. When the store of valuers are dominating the network gets nurtured, value goes up.

Expect this to see-saw continually until the "unit of accounters" arrive on the scene.

I'm one of those storers of value. The ways I measure that value include the access to blockspace for colored coins and timestamps etc.  With less access, there is less value. 

You'll never get unit of accounters with a value that fluctuates so wildly. 

Money has five properties: Recognizable, portable, fungible, scarce and divisible.

Small blocks make bitcoin less divisible for practical purposes. Lack of divisibility is one reason why gold is no longer used as money, even in black markets. Been tracking gold prices lately?  You want that to happen for Bitcoin?



3017. Post 13209573 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Ultrafinery on December 10, 2015, 10:54:33 PM

>>>billyjoeallen: the whole lock analogy is inappropriate. The bloating thieves don't get anything of value by bloating the blockchain, shit inside house stays inside.  What they do is essentially piss on your stoop, thus decreasing the attractiveness of your neighborhood and, potentially, dropping property values.

Timestamps aren't valuable? microtransactions aren't valuable? equities and derivatives markets with low overhead and transparency aren't valuable? Low friction trade isn't valuable?

I suggest you look up "valuable" in the dictionary.







3018. Post 13209721 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Ultrafinery on December 10, 2015, 11:17:01 PM

>>>billyjoeallen: the whole lock analogy is inappropriate. The bloating thieves don't get anything of value by bloating the blockchain, shit inside house stays inside.  What they do is essentially piss on your stoop, thus decreasing the attractiveness of your neighborhood and, potentially, dropping property values.

Timestamps aren't valuable? microtransactions aren't valuable? equities and derivatives markets with low overhead and transparency aren't valuable? Low friction trade isn't valuable?
I suggest you look up "valuable" in the dictionary.



Have the thieves stolen any timestamps from you, by bloating the blockchain? How many microtransactions did they make off with?
How many equities and derivatives markets with low overhead and transparency?
If not obvious, no, no they did not. If I burn down your house, sure, you have to rebuild it/buy a new one, but I didn't steal it.

People who buy blockspace can do whatever the hell they want with it. It's theirs. They bought it. If I can sell 12 eggs profitably for $1 but scale up to sell 144 eggs profitably for $2, what the hell do I care if the buyer eggs a house or make an omelette?   The market rewards them for using resources wisely and punishes them for wasting them.  Who am I to say "you don't need more than 12 eggs" ESPECIALLY when i can benefit from economies of scale when I sell?  

The cost of running a node is trivial. I know. I'm running one (XT). The opportunity cost of pricing out most of our customers is huge.  Understand this: we sell blockspace. If we can sell a lot more for just marginally more overhead, everybody wins.  Greater efficiency is the only free lunch in the universe.



3019. Post 13209806 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 10, 2015, 11:34:30 PM
Quote
Understand this: we sell blockspace.

ummm, wait, didn't you just say before that is was the one true P2P CASH system? Now it is a blockspace real estate bucket shop operation?

As Andreas Antonopolis says, it's "the Internet of money". You apparently want to keep connections limited to 300 baud modems so only the most useful information is shared.



3020. Post 13209911 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 10, 2015, 11:44:00 PM


Quote
It's by design a peer-to-peer electronic CASH system.
your words.

No wonder nobody takes you idiots seriously because you have no arguments just dumb half-baked economic theories, innuendo and then finally smearing and butthurt ragequit.

But I also suspect this is not the real BJA but someone he sold his account to ... someone who is quite happy to troll endlessly on a seemingly divisive issue (but that in reality was settled long ago) to stir up the FUD and milk the confusion cow for as long as possible.

It's the title of the motherfucking white paper, Marcus. If it's settled, then why do you even bother responding to me? Are you afraid your fear-mongering about centralization isn't as effective as you want it to be?




3021. Post 13221833 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 12, 2015, 04:19:10 AM
Quote
No shit, Einstein. You must think very highly of yourself for figuring that out on your own.
Like I'm the only asshole talking his fucking book in here.

i like you already ... !
Thanks, man.
I'm a bull at heart. I have only recently been experimenting with shorting. I usually have better results than I did today, but sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes the bear eats you.
After smoking some Alaskan Thunder (in a chocolate wrap) and a few sips of Bushmills, I am calm, cool, and ready to explore all options.
I shorted at $450. What now folks? I'm open to suggestions. Be kind. I am humbly admitting my error.

buy the dip now

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!! Yeah, I'll get right on that.



3022. Post 13221912 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 12, 2015, 04:21:54 AM
Feel like 2013 yet TERA?
It's not like 2013 until the exchange is DDOSed

bfxdata.com is down.



3023. Post 13221943 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: r0ach on December 12, 2015, 04:41:16 AM
Ok, all BFX longs wrecked, now we proceed to $10,000.
all $25 million  in longs? Not even close. not yet. What's more, there were only 7K BTC shorts to cover. We're flying blind until bfxdata.com is back up, but there's no way all those longs got rekt or we'd be in the $200s.



3024. Post 13222185 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: DaRude on December 12, 2015, 05:19:38 AM
Ok, all BFX longs wrecked, now we proceed to $10,000.
all $25 million  in longs? Not even close. not yet. What's more, there were only 7K BTC shorts to cover. We're flying blind until bfxdata.com is back up, but there's no way all those longs got rekt or we'd be in the $200s.

Hate to disappoint everyone but longs are still at $26MM hard little critters to squash
https://www.bitfinex.com/pages/stats

That's not disappointing at all! More longs to get squeezed. Forced liquidation in the middle of a crash causes a margin call cascade and i get cheap coinz. 20K more to dump is all it would take.



3025. Post 13222321 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 12, 2015, 05:47:43 AM
looks like 402 was the bottom for now

$1.3MM in new longs, and half the shorts covered already!  Keep in mind we don't know how many hidden buy and sell orders there are and I'd say that the potential downside is greater than the potential upside.



3026. Post 13225874 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: DaRude on December 12, 2015, 07:22:01 AM
Ok, all BFX longs wrecked, now we proceed to $10,000.
all $25 million  in longs? Not even close. not yet. What's more, there were only 7K BTC shorts to cover. We're flying blind until bfxdata.com is back up, but there's no way all those longs got rekt or we'd be in the $200s.

Hate to disappoint everyone but longs are still at $26MM hard little critters to squash
https://www.bitfinex.com/pages/stats

That's not disappointing at all! More longs to get squeezed. Forced liquidation in the middle of a crash causes a margin call cascade and i get cheap coinz. 20K more to dump is all it would take.

We went from $475 to $402 and barely any longs were squeezed!!  Shocked Shorts are so tight they burn when we move up $10 feel something else is at play here.

I am surprised someone didn't dump the remaining $2 to put us under $400 would maybe see some cascades then  Huh

What makes you think this is over? It could be, but it could also be that whoever dumped 50K coins bought them back just to dump them again when we think the coast is clear.  What I want to know is who is buying now at $425 when they could have bought at $410.  There's no new money coming in until Monday at the earliest and margin longs are paying me the equivalent of >30% APR to borrow my fiat.  Considering that the vast majority of my BTC holdings are in cold storage, it only makes sense to take the risk free return of margin funding rather than margin trading.



3027. Post 13228499 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 12, 2015, 05:17:32 PM
, it only makes sense to take the risk free return of margin funding rather than margin trading.

Risk free? And if BFX pulls a pirate?

risk free with respect to the exchange rate. I'm well aware of the exchange risk itself. I had an account at Gox.



3028. Post 13228778 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

200 coin buy on bfx. Volume picking up. Tonight may show if we're going up or down for the next few days.  I'm guessing up. Someone's sitting on a giant pile of cash and could easily lock in BTC profits at this point, but margin longs are very vulnerable to getting squeezed if tonight is like last night.



3029. Post 13229578 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 12, 2015, 09:35:38 PM
I came on here today to see 10 different people posting 10 different charts with 10 different sets of weird indicators/lines all with an arrow shooting way up into the sky. I'll take that as indication that it's NOT Time to bet the farm just yet.

What do the order books tell you? That seems to be a more reliable indicator.



3030. Post 13229618 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 12, 2015, 10:17:12 PM
When the network gets near hitting capacity of ~220,000 tx per day, the rally gets its head lopped off... coincidence?

https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions

Any future rally will be meaningfully constrained by this "safety feature".  

... soon time to start high-grading for valuable TX anyway. It's an industrial level tech., can't always remain a sandpit for toy projects. Which makes you misguided about rallies being "constrained" ... but hey, who am I to stop people losing money?

toy projects like allowing a billion people to claw their way out of squalor?  Toys are things that are not needed, you elitist fuck.  Find some other way to buy drugs and cheat on taxes. Helping impoverished people save money is not a toy project.



3031. Post 13231976 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Let's see if bulls can do better next time. I made a little money on the failed attempt at $445 so now You will have to buy even more, but you might do it. Just don't pump to over $3,000 or I'll get a margin call. HAHAHAHA.

Scale or die.



3032. Post 13234654 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: bitebits on December 13, 2015, 07:48:09 AM
When the network gets near hitting capacity of ~220,000 tx per day, the rally gets its head lopped off... coincidence?

https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions

Any future rally will be meaningfully constrained by this "safety feature".  

That does not makes sense, since it would prevent bitcoins being send to the exchanges (which is of course not the case, since the fee will be set slightly higher to get access to the priority lane). The opposite would be true if your theory would be the case.

Most of the current bitcoin price is speculative value. That means that coins on the exchanges are only there to be sold, lent out, or used as leverage for margin trading. If no coins can get in or out, the only other way out is to SELL and withdraw fiat. Think MtGox only backwards.  People are less likely to move coins to an exchange or ANYWHERE if the xaction fees go up significantly.

Also, we know this MMM ponzi will end badly, as all pyramid schemes do. If the current rally is based on that, then we can expect a retracement when the pozi collapses.  That, coupled with the massive amount of margin longs relative to margin shorts, and there is a real possibility of a squeeze down into the $200-300 trafing range we've been stuck in for the last year.

There's almost no shorts to get squeezed. This rally likely won't go above the previous top if it isn't over already.  Even if it does, we'll probably hit the xaction limit and reverse Gox will bring it back down.

But hey, honey badger don't give a shit and markets can stay irrational longer than leveraged traders can stay solvent, so go ahead and pump.  I want to quintuple up my margin short anyway.




3033. Post 13234683 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 13, 2015, 10:39:37 AM
Let's see if bulls can do better next time. I made a little money on the failed attempt at $445 so now You will have to buy even more, but you might do it. Just don't pump to over $3,000 or I'll get a margin call. HAHAHAHA.

Scale or die.

Weren't you screaming the same when the price hit ~260$ two months ago in October and sold like 50 coins and counting? Some people will never learn I guess.

edit: found it

Thanks for finding that BjA post.  he's got a lot of real retarded posts, even though once in a while he will say something that makes sense.

That should be really retarded posts, unless you are suggesting other posts are fake retarded.



3034. Post 13234714 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on December 13, 2015, 12:51:41 PM
Seriously, you guys are still counting BTC/CNY volume on Huobi and OKCoin? Get a clue.

Thinking is kinda what we do here now. Old-timer. Tongue

Show some respect to the lady, Mr. Mayor. She's made enough money trading against me to buy a car.



3035. Post 13235597 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

so a 500 coin pump causes a $5 price bump. At that rate, it would take only 3 million $ to get to $500 and probably ~ 10 million bucks to do it world wide. Get at it, bulls. You know you've been waiting all weekend for your discount, so BUY BUY BUY because new fiat gets to the exchanges when the banks open tomorrow.





3036. Post 13243901 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Well I tripled upon my short. Not too worried as I still have close to a $900 liquidation price. New margin longs outnumber margin shorts over 1000:1.  When this rally stalls out,, You bulls better hope somebody's down there with a safety net because this order book is looking like there might be a correction any time.


now comes the hard part: the waiting.



3037. Post 13246898 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

on BFX:

~ 3 million coins margin long. That's ~20% of all coins in existence! Anybody rich could crash this market. I'm paying 0.5% interest every 100 days, there are so many coins available for shorting. All I have to do is wait.


So what's going to happen first, the Fed raising rates and crushing all dollar denominated assets or full blocks causing a fee spike and a network slowdown?





 






3038. Post 13247134 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Pruden on December 14, 2015, 05:34:18 PM
on BFX:

~ 3 million coins margin long. That's ~20% of all coins in existence! Anybody rich could crash this market. I'm paying 0.5% interest every 100 days, there are so many coins available for shorting. All I have to do is wait.


So what's going to happen first, the Fed raising rates and crushing all dollar denominated assets or full blocks causing a fee spike and a network slowdown?

Go to Cryptofacilities.com, contracts trade at a ~60%/year premium, so you earn interest for shorting.

Also, where do you see 20% of coins long? Total swaps are 25M$, that's less than .5%.

Yeah, I screwed up.  it;s about 57,000 coins. Thanks for catching that.

This is what is called a low volume melt up.  $2 million in margin longs opened in the last 24 hours so more than the entire 1.6% rise has been caused by leveraged trading.  

according to the order book, it will take ~ $5 million more to get to $500. it's take between $2-3 million on stamp just to get up to last Friday's high.

We're at almost 3X the $162 low in August. It's hard to imagine a sustainable rise without one or more serious tests of support.







3039. Post 13247532 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: TQMA on December 14, 2015, 03:45:02 PM


Coinbase HUGE volume?? very abnormal for "Coinbase", daily avg 5k a 7k???!

Coinbase is regulated and I think their reported volume is more likely to be accurate.  Volume like that may indicate a sea change.



3040. Post 13248026 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on December 14, 2015, 07:00:35 PM
Coin



Explanation


Look at those walls, bulls. Market buy after market buy and the price is actually going Down.  Now's you chance to buy with minimum slippage. 

Bears are placing limit orders to minimize slippage.  That's what we have to do with the bid order book so thin.



3041. Post 13249832 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

interest on USD at BFX is almost 20X the interest for BTC. Last time this happened was just before the $504 crash.



3042. Post 13250050 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 14, 2015, 11:21:29 PM
go short now, please.

You must be part of the almost $27MM in longs on BFX then, I take it?



3043. Post 13251336 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Well, this sucks. I really thought $450 would hold. It's a good thing I'm only paying 1/18th as much interest on my short as the longs are paying.

It's a good thing I still have my cold storage stash. I'm thinking there is a real possibility I'm going to get margin called at >800. Less than 50/50, but enough to get me worried.



3044. Post 13251598 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Over $27 million in longs now.  This is getting crazy.  There's not nearly enough money on the exchange to absorb that.  Are y'all expecting suckers to wire 27 million bucks to a sketchy exchange to buy coins when you close your longs? 

It's going through the floor if there is a major shock. 



3045. Post 13255316 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: ImI on December 15, 2015, 01:01:41 PM

nicy nice



Yeah, so now we get full blocks commonly. Price goes up much more and we'll have every block full. 



3046. Post 13255471 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 15, 2015, 01:24:56 PM
open bazaar almost ready  Smiley

it's been almost ready for six months. I'll believe it when it happens.



3047. Post 13255549 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Order book on BFX has changed massively. Only 4K coins down to $425. Over 12K coins to $500.

You got to be brave as hell to take that on. I figure ~half asks are fake and half bids are hidden, so sideways creeping up is the likely path.  Half a million in longs closed last night, replace with unleveraged longs, which indicates less volatility.





3048. Post 13259199 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Follow this train of logic:

1.Difficulty goes up because blocks are being produced at a rate greater than 1 every ten minutes.
2.Blocks are  mined at a slower rate at a higher difficulty with the same hash rate
3. So confirmations will take a little longer right around the same time a lot of blocks are filling up.

This might be a very opportune time for a spam attack. That combined with blocksize deadlock and the Fed possibly raising interest rates for the first time in seven years means the next 24 hours are critical.





3049. Post 13261802 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

on BFX: 13K in ask orders to $500 is now down to 7.5 K.  Sell side order book just got chopped in half. Of course with the ability to hide orders, Bitstamp order book is more reliable. on stamp, there are about twice as many asks as bids in the $20 range up and down. 



3050. Post 13263019 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TReano on December 16, 2015, 02:04:35 AM
on BFX: 13K in ask orders to $500 is now down to 7.5 K.  Sell side order book just got chopped in half. Of course with the ability to hide orders, Bitstamp order book is more reliable. on stamp, there are about twice as many asks as bids in the $20 range up and down. 

I wouldn't pay too much attention to the orderbook. It's only helpfull when there is real action going on from my experience.

I learned that the Second Level is not that important by trading forex.

I don't pay that much attention.  What is much more important is volume, but it's not completely irrelevant either. It's maybe 10-25%

BREAKING: nice little dump and for the first time in years, I caught it perfectly @$440.00 on  BFX.  I'm still short but I took a little risk off the table.  Tomorrow will be the BIG SHOW, IMHO. 

I'm a little concerned  that unlike the last correction, margin shorts actually went UP instead of down. That indicates increasing volatility.




3051. Post 13263601 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 16, 2015, 05:31:00 AM
dump and we're still above 450

You have to look at the volume. Roughly the same amount of coins were bought after the dump as were sold in the dump, but the price only recovered half way. That's a pretty strong signal that this rally may be petering out. I'm going to take most of the coins I caught by bottom ticking the dump perfectly and sell them again at $459. 

Y'all can short almost for free because the interest rate is so cheap.  All I have to do is wait. if it goes down, I can cover.  If it goes up You have to believe it will never come back down.  Pretty much any position is a winning position if you wait long enough. That means either long, cash or margin short. the only position that can chew you up even if you end up winning eventually is margin long because of the high interest rate.

The only time I go margin long now is immediately AFTER a long squeeze.




3052. Post 13266265 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 16, 2015, 06:49:34 AM
It's down 3%. That's it,  Bitcoin is dying.

yeah, but if you look at the chart upside down, it doesn't look so scary for bears anymore, does it?



3053. Post 13266292 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Just crossed over into the green on the 1 HR moving average with no pump at all!
People aren't using this indicator anymore?



3054. Post 13266428 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on December 16, 2015, 01:26:18 PM
Just crossed over into the green on the 1 HR moving average with no pump at all!
People aren't using this indicator anymore?

What does this mean BJA?

it means the upward momentum may be petering out.



3055. Post 13266831 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: inca on December 16, 2015, 02:11:44 PM
Now we find out if this is a bull market..place your bets

That entirely depends on what time frame you are looking at. We're still more than 50% down from the ATH.
Still have no scaling solution.

BTC can go up or down, but fiat is safe and pays a nice interest rate at much lower risk.

if BTC goes down 50% and then goes up 50%, you're still at 75% of where you started.



3056. Post 13266991 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on December 16, 2015, 02:30:18 PM
It's unlikely the Fed will hike rates: the world is addicted to cheap credit now and the restrictive monetary policy would send the global GDP to oblivion.

You may be right, but I give it a 51% chance that they will hike 1/8-1/4%.  Yellen knows that Jawboning only works so long before we stop believing her, so she might have to give it a little bump to maintain her credibility. She has said over and over that rates need to normalize and if she KNOWS that if markets get too addicted to cheap credit that they will never be able to normalize, because the crash would be catastrophic.

Fuck, I don't know. We'll see. It's gonna be something.



3057. Post 13267410 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 16, 2015, 02:56:27 PM
when did you become such a bear troll BJA?

Bulls are in a dangerous position. If the market goes much higher, xaction rate will raise, slowing the network down.  Then xaction fees will rise, hurting the business model of many of the most well-funded Bitcoin companies. The network is already a tiny bit slower with the difficulty hike.  

Plus there are such a low number of shorts that the money flowing in will have to absorb almost the entire dump with very little short covering.  

I'm only bearish because of the scaling problem. If it wasn't for that, I'd be all in. As I've said all along, I'm always net long because of my cold storage stash.

Scaling is a major issue. Is Bitcoin really anti-fragile or not? We just don't know yet.






3058. Post 13267656 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: goldsun on December 16, 2015, 03:49:38 PM
Anyone who are more into bitcoin than me, could you please share some insight about how we will do in the coming days?

Will we go down from here or up?

To get good advice, you would need an answer from someone smart and honest. Without being here a while, you don't know who that is, so you'll be getting advice people talking their book and people trying to trick you into giving them your fiat or coins. 

Free advice is worth what you pay for it.



3059. Post 13268221 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 16, 2015, 04:32:06 PM
The network is already a tiny bit slower with the difficulty hike.  
? really?
scaling problem

you do understand that eventually miners are going to need money from people transacting, not just block rewards right? next year they become twice as dependent on this... it's an element of bitcoin. and it's not fatal. how else do you keep a blockchain healthy?


Yes, I understand that. We just disagree on how soon that has to happen. If smallblockers get too greedy, WE won't have the adoption rate to sustain the miners when the reward goes away. 
Miner reward= (block reward +xaction fees)* exchange rate.

With a high exchange rate relative to the last six months, the developers have little incentive to address the scaling issue seriously. I have no indication that either blocksize or another scaling solution will be implemented before blocks fill up, fees spike, xaction confirmation times slow down and all this will be effected in the exchange rate. 

Then there are all sorts of other issues with unknown outcomes and I think that this uncertainty hasn't been priced in adequately. I could be wrong, so don't take this as gospel. Time will tell.



3060. Post 13274136 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):


Quote from: peonminer on December 17, 2015, 07:04:44 AM
Willy just got rebooted, looks like we're headed for pump mode. I suggest you exit your shorts while you still can.

There's only ~7500 shorts on BFX. Nobody's shorting except me.  Longs are just deleveraging, taking profits or cutting losses. It's smart to do it just a little at a time because if they dump all at once, the price plummets. There is little known support down to $420. Every dump drops the price ~twice as far as it goes up with a pump. 
Hey, we could be going up, but it doesn't look parabolic. 2 HR moving average just crossed into the red.




3061. Post 13278026 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: KaliLinux on December 17, 2015, 03:51:25 PM
Are we still going up or should I short now?
What do the pros think?

I'm not a pro and this advice is worth what you pay for it, but technicals look really good and fundamentals look really bad. TERA makes piles of money trading ponzi schemes and I believe she is still bullish, so if you're looking to trade, buy. If you're looking to invest, hold off until the scaling problem is solved.



3062. Post 13278068 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on December 17, 2015, 04:02:11 PM


You say that like it's a bad thing. I do think anarcho-capitalism is poorly named. Distributed governance would be a better descriptor.  Libertarianism is anarchy for smart people.



3063. Post 13278215 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: ElCastrato on December 17, 2015, 04:23:33 PM


You say that like it's a bad thing. I do think anarcho-capitalism is poorly named. Distributed governance would be a better descriptor.  Libertarianism is anarchy for smart people.

No. Today's Libertarianism is a tool, used by rich people to trick the dumb poor (whose greatest dream is to be rich) into thinking that what's good for the rich is good for them.

We have a different understanding of economics. What's good for the rich is centralized government that can be bought much easier than providing value in the marketplace. The State is just an engine for concentrating benefits and distributing costs. 

Common people think concentrated power is great, if only the right people are in charge. The problem is that the system is designed so that the right people never get in charge.  You can't wear the One Ring for any length of time and keep your soul. You have to throw that bitch into the fires of Mount Doom.



3064. Post 13278230 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on December 17, 2015, 04:35:23 PM
TERA makes piles of money trading ponzi schemes

How long does one have to be preoccupied with trading on a daily basis to earn, let's say, twenty grands a year? What would the required initial capital be?

If you are good enough, you could do it with a thousand bucks. If you suck, you could turn a million bucks into twenty grand in a year.



3065. Post 13278346 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on December 17, 2015, 04:43:27 PM
If you are good enough, you could do it with a thousand bucks. If you suck, you could turn a million bucks into twenty grand in a year.

I guess we won't get statistical information... not that Homo statisticus' (Bitcoin) average trader exists, but it's indicative. Anecdotal (but actual) evidence is welcome too.

The average trader loses money. It's close to the Parato ratio 80:20 losers:winners. Not that many of the losers will admit that.



3066. Post 13278462 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: ElCastrato on December 17, 2015, 04:47:01 PM

We have a different understanding of economics. What's good for the rich is centralized government that can be bought much easier than providing value in the marketplace. The State is just an engine for concentrating benefits and distributing costs.  

Common people think concentrated power is great, if only the right people are in charge. The problem is that the system is designed so that the right people never get in charge.  You can't wear the One Ring for any length of time and keep your soul. You have to throw that bitch into the fires of Mount Doom.

>Common people think
Good thing you're unlike the common poor, a thinking feller, more like the rich. If it wasn't for the meddling gubermint...
Divide and conquer Smiley


This is why I don't like to get drawn into discussions with newbies. Sarcasm isn't an argument. If you want to talk about divide and conquer, look at what's happening with the core developers. There are real technical and philosophical differences in opinion that are being exacerbated by someone. What is unknown is if it is manipulators trying to get coins on the cheap or banksters killing the competition.

But if you think the State doesn't have it's useful idiots like you claim rich people do, then look at every serviceman who came home in a flag-draped coffin.



3067. Post 13278638 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on December 17, 2015, 05:09:20 PM
holding fiat has burned me zero times

Inflation, though, lightly scorches you; that's why one has to invest her savings.

That's a good point that I agree with strongly, but until this blocksize/scaling issue gets solved, You're just gambling (unless you have asymmetric information).

What I hate about the current economic situation is that we are FORCED to gamble because interest real interest rates are negative (adjusting for inflation). The safest investment is paying off all high interest loans and living within your means. Invest your time in learning things, getting in shape and staying healthy. Invest in people you love. 





3068. Post 13278687 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: ElCastrato on December 17, 2015, 05:19:59 PM

We have a different understanding of economics. What's good for the rich is centralized government that can be bought much easier than providing value in the marketplace. The State is just an engine for concentrating benefits and distributing costs.  

Common people think concentrated power is great, if only the right people are in charge. The problem is that the system is designed so that the right people never get in charge.  You can't wear the One Ring for any length of time and keep your soul. You have to throw that bitch into the fires of Mount Doom.

>Common people think
Good thing you're unlike the common poor, a thinking feller, more like the rich. If it wasn't for the meddling gubermint...
Divide and conquer Smiley


This is why I don't like to get drawn into discussions with newbies. Sarcasm isn't an argument. If you want to talk about divide and conquer, look at what's happening with the core developers. There are real technical and philosophical differences in opinion that are being exacerbated by someone. What is unknown is if it is manipulators trying to get coins on the cheap or banksters killing the competition.

But if you think the State doesn't have it's useful idiots like you claim rich people do, then look at every serviceman who came home in a flag-draped coffin.

Sarcasm has nothing to do with my being new. I gave you a case-in-point example of how effectively you've been brainwashed, disassociating yourself from "[those clueless] common people," who, presumably, haven't pierced the veil. Not like the special snowflake with esoteric knowledge gleaned from the sacred texts of zerohedge, mises.org & the CATO 'Institute.'
Not like you! Smiley

Ok, we're into name-calling. I'm done now.



3069. Post 13278809 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Ibian on December 17, 2015, 05:30:01 PM
If you are good enough, you could do it with a thousand bucks. If you suck, you could turn a million bucks into twenty grand in a year.

I guess we won't get statistical information... not that Homo statisticus' (Bitcoin) average trader exists, but it's indicative. Anecdotal (but actual) evidence is welcome too.

The average trader loses money. It's close to the Parato ratio 80:20 losers:winners. Not that many of the losers will admit that.

holding fiat has burned me zero times
Well, aside from the constant devaluation.

Devaluation as compared to what? And it what time-frame? Gold and oil are not holding their value against the dollar. Yes, there is an inflation tax, but dollars are the most liquid asset in the world, so for many it is worth it to have flexibility. Things change. You have to have the ability to adapt to new conditions and fiat helps you do that.

Someday some form of crypto will likely be better, but it won't be on a network with a 7 transaction per second capacity.



3070. Post 13278967 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: MoreNewSolutions on December 17, 2015, 05:37:09 PM
If you are good enough, you could do it with a thousand bucks. If you suck, you could turn a million bucks into twenty grand in a year.

I guess we won't get statistical information... not that Homo statisticus' (Bitcoin) average trader exists, but it's indicative. Anecdotal (but actual) evidence is welcome too.

The average trader loses money. It's close to the Parato ratio 80:20 losers:winners. Not that many of the losers will admit that.

holding fiat has burned me zero times
Well, aside from the constant devaluation.
Well see, fiat is meant to discourage you from holding it, because it's money. It's meant to encourage you to *invest* in useful shit, like real businesses that do actual stuff, or spend it on shit you enjoy, like hookers and blow.
And it has almost succeeded in your case, but not quite. You did figure out that you shouldn't just hodl fiat, but then went on to 'invest' in what amounts to little more than an elaborate pyramid scheme. Oh well, nothing's perfect, all has fallen short of His glory. Even fiat.

I hear what you're saying, but it comes back to economics. You can't have SUSTAINABLE growth without capital formation (savings). You can't build wealth without deferring gratification. A fisherman who wants to be more productive than catching fish by hand has to take time away from fishing to make a fishing rod.  Then he catches more fish faster, but he has to take time away from that to make a net or a trot line. 

 Fiat and artificially low interest rates are designed to increase the velocity of money at the expense of capital formation. This will destroy the economy in the long run. We're in the process of watching that play out now. 



3071. Post 13279039 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Ibian on December 17, 2015, 06:00:27 PM
If you are good enough, you could do it with a thousand bucks. If you suck, you could turn a million bucks into twenty grand in a year.

I guess we won't get statistical information... not that Homo statisticus' (Bitcoin) average trader exists, but it's indicative. Anecdotal (but actual) evidence is welcome too.

The average trader loses money. It's close to the Parato ratio 80:20 losers:winners. Not that many of the losers will admit that.

holding fiat has burned me zero times
Well, aside from the constant devaluation.
Well see, fiat is meant to discourage you from holding it, because it's money. It's meant to encourage you to *invest* in useful shit, like real businesses that do actual stuff, or spend it on shit you enjoy, like hookers and blow.
And it has almost succeeded in your case, but not quite. You did figure out that you shouldn't just hodl fiat, but then went on to 'invest' in what amounts to little more than an elaborate pyramid scheme. Oh well, nothing's perfect, all has fallen short of His glory. Even fiat.

I hear what you're saying, but it comes back to economics. You can't have SUSTAINABLE growth without capital formation (savings). You can't build wealth without deferring gratification. A fisherman who wants to be more productive than catching fish by hand has to take time away from fishing to make a fishing rod.  Then he catches more fish faster, but he has to take time away from that to make a net or a trot line. 

 Fiat and artificially low interest rates are designed to increase the velocity of money at the expense of capital formation. This will destroy the economy in the long run. We're in the process of watching that play out now. 
So which is it? For or against fiat?

When you ask an economist a question like that, they will respond with "as compared to what?" The question is meaningless otherwise.



3072. Post 13279311 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: MoreNewSolutions on December 17, 2015, 06:07:56 PM
...
Well see, fiat is meant to discourage you from holding it, because it's money. It's meant to encourage you to *invest* in useful shit, like real businesses that do actual stuff, or spend it on shit you enjoy, like hookers and blow.
And it has almost succeeded in your case, but not quite. You did figure out that you shouldn't just hodl fiat, but then went on to 'invest' in what amounts to little more than an elaborate pyramid scheme. Oh well, nothing's perfect, all has fallen short of His glory. Even fiat.

I hear what you're saying, but it comes back to economics. You can't have SUSTAINABLE growth without capital formation (savings).
Such an odd thing to say.
>SUSTAINABLE
What does that mean? What timeframe are we talking about?
>SUSTAINABLE growth
Is this even desirable? If so, why?
>SUSTAINABLE growth without capital formation (savings)
'Capital formation' does not mean 'money'. "Capital formation refers to net additions of capital stock such as equipment, buildings and other intermediate goods."--Investopedia

Quote
You can't build wealth without deferring gratification. A fisherman who wants to be more productive than catching fish by hand has to take time away from fishing to make a fishing rod.  Then he catches more fish faster, but he has to take time away from that to make a net or a trot line.
Relevance here? How does fiat figure into making nets & fishing rods?
Quote
Fiat and artificially low interest rates are designed to increase the velocity of money at the expense of capital formation. This will destroy the economy in the long run. We're in the process of watching that play out now.  
>Fiat and artificially low interest rates
Define natural interest rate of fiat.
>at the expense of capital formation
Huh
>This will destroy the economy in the long run.
Huh
>We're in the process of watching that play out now.
Please offer some sort of data. I'm doing just fine ('s far as anecdotal stuff goes) Smiley

If you want a capital good, say a tractor or a factory, how do you pay for it? Where does the resources used to produce such goods ultimately come from? If you are using fiat printed out of thin air and lent into existence through fractional reserve banking, then those resources are being stolen from existing holders of fiat (savers).  If you have a sound money system, then you either save to buy the capital goods or you borrow from somebody who did.  Either way, the capital formation comes from savings.

Bitcoin has nearly unlimited potential to replace the existing monetary system, but that won't mean shit if the scaling issue isn't solved.  Anyone can copy the code, tweek it to scale and with enough money can make an altcoin to overcome it's first mover advantage.  

Fiat is artificial surplus. Crypto is artificial scarcity.  Both have their strengths and weaknesses.



3073. Post 13279583 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: MoreNewSolutions on December 17, 2015, 06:53:50 PM
. The very notion that one should be able to store wealth, passively, by simply taking it out of circulation, is absurd. A ridiculous mental construct, fails both logically and ethically.

Perhaps you need to look up the definition of "store". That's how you store anything, by taking it out of circulation.

There's this little story of the ant and the grasshopper. Maybe you've heard of it?

It's so unethical for the people who produce wealth to be able to hold onto it, right?  People who live beyond their means really NEED that wealth, don't they?

So here's a logic question for you: if you punish people who produce wealth and you reward people who consume wealth, do you think there will be more or less wealth in the future? Will you see more production or consumption?



3074. Post 13279666 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: lama-hunter on December 17, 2015, 06:29:52 PM
If you are good enough, you could do it with a thousand bucks. If you suck, you could turn a million bucks into twenty grand in a year.

I guess we won't get statistical information... not that Homo statisticus' (Bitcoin) average trader exists, but it's indicative. Anecdotal (but actual) evidence is welcome too.

The average trader loses money. It's close to the Parato ratio 80:20 losers:winners. Not that many of the losers will admit that.

holding fiat has burned me zero times
Well, aside from the constant devaluation.
Well see, fiat is meant to discourage you from holding it, because it's money. It's meant to encourage you to *invest* in useful shit, like real businesses that do actual stuff, or spend it on shit you enjoy, like hookers and blow.
And it has almost succeeded in your case, but not quite. You did figure out that you shouldn't just hodl fiat, but then went on to 'invest' in what amounts to little more than an elaborate pyramid scheme. Oh well, nothing's perfect, all has fallen short of His glory. Even fiat.

I hear what you're saying, but it comes back to economics. You can't have SUSTAINABLE growth without capital formation (savings). You can't build wealth without deferring gratification. A fisherman who wants to be more productive than catching fish by hand has to take time away from fishing to make a fishing rod.  Then he catches more fish faster, but he has to take time away from that to make a net or a trot line. 

 Fiat and artificially low interest rates are designed to increase the velocity of money at the expense of capital formation. This will destroy the economy in the long run. We're in the process of watching that play out now. 
So which is it? For or against fiat?

When you ask an economist a question like that, they will respond with "as compared to what?" The question is meaningless otherwise.
That's what we call a non-answer.
You could also say a State Movement Wink

Look, i'd love to chat about economics and such, but I can't get over this scaling problem.  This network can only support about half a million active users, but it has a market cap of 6.7 billion dollars.  That's crazy overvalued until we get bigger blocks.



3075. Post 13279794 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: MoreNewSolutions on December 17, 2015, 07:13:34 PM

You're bringing ethics into this now? "Go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me" ring a bell?


This is why you can't argue logic with religious people. Sure, give me all your money now and you get pie in the sky when you die. There's always a point at which faith trumps reason.

Maybe that's true, but I don't want to get hung on a cross or eaten by lions. The treasures I have are my family right here on earth and if I can provide for them, then that's my reward.





3076. Post 13279856 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: MoreNewSolutions on December 17, 2015, 07:13:34 PM

I do not punish anyone for doing anything.
What you're essentially saying is "If I do something that currently nets me X dollars, why can't I have X+2 dollars, why are you punishing me?"


Because of time preferences. Now is worth more than later. You want me to have x-2 so people who spend all they make can spend more than they make. Less gets made that way, no matter how it is re-distributed.




3077. Post 13279935 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on December 17, 2015, 07:38:22 PM

You're bringing ethics into this now? "Go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me" ring a bell?


This is why you can't argue logic with religious people. Sure, give me all your money now and you get pie in the sky when you die. There's always a point at which faith trumps reason.

Maybe that's true, but I don't want to get hung on a cross or eaten by lions. The treasures I have are my family right here on earth and if I can provide for them, then that's my reward.

You're not arguing logic with a religious person.
You're arguing logic with someone who understand that ethics have nothing to do with logic, and western ethics in particular are based on Judeo-Christian teachings.
TL;DR: Ethics are no different from religion, immune from logical analysis (not that people haven't tried). Good job ignoring the rest of the stuff I said.

Human morality is a production of natural selection. Behaving ethically is an evolutionarily stable strategy. Our religious fables are just fantastic narratives trying to explain or justify it.

I basically agree with that, although I might quibble that there is a subtle difference between ethics and morality. It's a point only philosophers really care about, but I think the core developers must be discussing it BECAUSE THEY SURE AREN'T DOING ANYTHING TO FIX THE SCALING PROBLEM.



3078. Post 13281532 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: peonminer on December 17, 2015, 09:36:01 PM


Nobody but me is shorting. Just look at BFX.com.  Only 691 shorts opened up in the last 24 hrs. All the short-sellers (except me) got wiped out in the November spike. No, two million bucks worth of margin longs deleveraged to bulls. That's all. That means they only have another 24 million to deleverage before they can pull their damn coins out of BFX before it goes GOX. 



3079. Post 13281680 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 17, 2015, 10:20:12 PM
ok ... the overnight model runs are in and the news looks good.

456 was expected to be an important number and looks to have confirmed. 500 is a pressure point but not an important number as such, 600 equally weighted.

620 is an important number ... strangely there doesn't seem to be much else between ATH 1250 ish (pressure point) and then important number 1666!

You mean much else besides a 1 MB brick wall?  You seriously think we could get that high without jamming up the network? I'm a firefighter. You can't put out a conflagration with a garden hose, no matter how much water you have in the tank. Capacity matters.



3080. Post 13281833 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 17, 2015, 11:37:26 PM
I'm a firefighter. You can't put out a conflagration with a garden hose, no matter how much water you have in the tank. Capacity matters.

As a firefighter, do you also have cantankerous, intransigent opinionated positions on technical details of the electricity network grid, the railway network, the telecomms infrastructure or interstate traffic systems?

Yes. In every case you mentioned, capacity matters. If the core devs can't increase capacity, then we have a 6.7 billion dollar network that can only handle half a million active users, no matter how high fees they pay.

I also don't power whole cities with an extension chord or run bullet trains on narrow gauge tracks.



3081. Post 13281894 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

I am just a firefighter, but before that I was a nuclear power plant operator in the Navy, so you may not want to dismiss my technical opinions so easily.  Blue collar guys can know a thing or two about complex systems.

You're basically saying the core devs either can't get the network to scale or they won't. Which case is supposed to make me bullish?



3082. Post 13281980 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

UPDATE: SwampNode is up and running BitcoinXT on dedicated hardware. If you have a better solution, I'd like to hear it, but it had better be soon. We're getting full blocks daily now. Before long it will be hourly and then every damn one.  You can imagine what happens to bitcoin price when the only offramp from the exchanges is fiat. Only it won't just be one exchange. It will be all of them.



3083. Post 13282043 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: rocks on December 18, 2015, 12:04:36 AM

This is the simple reason why shorting BTC was just plain dumb.

There is a limited number of BTC available to borrow to short Bitcoin.

On the other hand there is an infinite number of dollars available to borrow to leverage long into Bitcoin. You guys are complaining about $24 million leveraged longs on bfx, well the banks have over $100 trillion in leveraged dollar longs. The supply of dollars to borrow is infinite.

Just wait until the Gemini exchange in wall street gets going. It's going to make bfx look like a doll house. And Gemini will have access to all the dollars in the world to lend to people, but they will have very few BTC to lend as well. You do the math.

Yeah, because regulated exchanges are not going to report your earning to the IRS. They won't honor court orders to seize your account. The Winklevi are good or bad at implementing their ideas? Maybe ask Mark Zuckerberg about that. I'm sure he's just love to give his old pals a bunch of money and there is no way he would take advantage of any vulnerabilities in Bitcoin just to eat their lunch again. No way he could ever implement a better version of their idea. I mean, he's never done that before, right?

Come to think of it, he's prime suspect number one behind the rough consensus attack, but even if it's not Zuck, it could be someone or a group thinking like that.

EDIT: speaking of the creators of Facebook, have you logged into your MySpace account lately? I mean, first mover advantage gives you a permanent lock on market share, right?

EDIT: You know there is also an infinite amount of money to short bitcoin with leverage also. Judging by the near zero interest rate on borrowing coins, there are plenty available for exactly that purpose.



3084. Post 13282139 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on December 18, 2015, 12:19:07 AM
UPDATE: SwampNode is up and running BitcoinXT on dedicated hardware. If you have a better solution, I'd like to hear it, but it had better be soon. We're getting full blocks daily now. Before long it will be hourly and then every damn one.  You can imagine what happens to bitcoin price when the only offramp from the exchanges is fiat. Only it won't just be one exchange. It will be all of them.

You seem alarmed. 3 of 5 core devs are (I believe) in principle opposed to bigger blocks, and are by conflict of interest disincentivised to buckle. Problem?

Why would it be alarming that the guys in charge of scaling the network have incentives to not let it scale? I mean, that just plain bullish in crazy land.

Speaking of crazy, where's Professor Trolfi these days? The guy's a terrible economist but he made good points about technical issues. Even wrote his own scaling patch.



3085. Post 13282153 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: peonminer on December 18, 2015, 12:20:59 AM
Even if we hard fork with a 75% general concensus for a bigger transaction capacity, why would this cause anyone to sell out their stash? The derp is strong in this forum.

If that happened, I would go all in. Leveraged. Trade between long and margin long only.



3086. Post 13282191 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 18, 2015, 12:35:19 AM

Gmaxwell's roadmap for increasing the network capacity has good consensus and is the most logical way forward. Solutions for the long-term will gradually become more apparent as it approaches but a better solution is always only 1 lightbulb moment away. Discounting human ingenuity in favour of mediocre workarounds will doom you to losing money.

They've had YEARS to get a lightbulb moment. It's like waiting for economically viable fusion reactors. It's not just a technical issue. But it's worse than that. It's philosophical and ideological. It's expecting two guys who by your own admission have incentives to not do their goddamn jobs--who both have effective veto power--to come up with a solution that will ruin their side businesses. 




3087. Post 13282227 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

So who's buying today that couldn't have bought yesterday when FOMO was running rampant?  Every ten minutes, new coins are mined. Every day, blocks get closer to 1MB.  Every day, the people that bought above $460 feel a little more burned.



3088. Post 13282432 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: peonminer on December 18, 2015, 12:59:20 AM
You should add a few coins to your short Wink Tongue


Nobody is fucking shorting except me. Where do you get this idea that it's margin bears holding the price down? ~ 374 coins were shorted in the last 24 hours. That's about 1/10th of the coins mined in that period.  How much of a pop is a 7K coin short squeeze gonna give you?  You would also have to believe that 24 Million in leveraged longs on BFX alone aren't going to take profits before that happens. 

The pump if there is one has to come from new money.  Who besides me even has any fiat now? Other bears, that's who and we ain't buying at these prices.



3089. Post 13282492 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: lightfoot on December 18, 2015, 12:58:45 AM
But i hear many blocks get mined with zero or few tx's.. why?  

edit - dafuq is a lambie sorry hahaha
Lot of spam transactions, clog up the fucking bitcoind getwork. Thus transactions have to have a min tx fee. Also there is a fake belief that not putting the transactions into the found block will allow your crap-pool to mine a tiny advantage on the next block.

Let's assume that you successfully get people to pay 50% xaction fees. How much does that give miners if that drives the price back down to $10/BTC?

You think the people that sunk hundreds of millions into Circle, Bitpay and 21 will put another fucking dime into bitcoin before this scaling thing is resolved? 

CRIPPLE COINS FOR SALE. ONLY A HUNDRED PERCENT HIGHER THAN THEY WERE THREE MONTHS AGO!

wOOhOO! LET ME GET RIGHT ON THAT. A REAL BARGAIN.



3090. Post 13282985 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

We have a winner. Breaking up. With 600 coins. It's funny that we think that's a lot because of yesterday's and today's flatline . What happens on that low of volume means very little. except it hasn't moved the market more than 3 bucks so far. 

BFX is under Stamp. very unusual. Margin longs continue to deleverage.  This is an excellent opportunity for many of them.  Risk off except in China. 

aaaand it's gone.




3091. Post 13283082 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

a 700 coin pump moved the price up a buck forty. Bulls have to be more committed than that. You spend too much money on the pump then you can't take profits without crashing it back down again. Volume is everything in this game.  

EDIT: Aaaaand it's gone.



3092. Post 13283255 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 18, 2015, 03:55:22 AM



Throwback Thursday,  To the early glorious days of Wall Observer.



Yeah, well, we weren't hard up on a full block problem back then. Those were good days. Isn't it also called "dump Thursday"?

The charts make you look a little desperate. Hey, good luck.



3093. Post 13283312 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 18, 2015, 04:08:01 AM



Throwback Thursday,  To the early glorious days of Wall Observer.



Yeah, well, we weren't hard up on a full block problem back then. Those were good days. Isn't it also called "dump Thursday"?

The charts make you look a little desperate. Hey, good luck.
I actually just like looking at big numbers and really fast tickers flying along. It was like nerd porn. Also, you knew roughly how much liquidity was there for trading purposes and it wasn't as much guesswork.

Oh, I expect they'll be flying one way or another soon. This is Bitcoin after all. The problem is nobody is going to send fiat to BFX unless there is enough of a price differential to compensate for the risk. There are just too many more reliable options now. If you have your coins there, I suggest you move or go back to Bitstamp or something else with a lot of liquidity. BFX is like a boat anchor on the whole market. 



3094. Post 13283368 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Gox was such a fun place to trade because pretty much the whole market was there. So much liquidity and you really only had to follow one chart. Little did we know a certain Frenchman was blowing our deposits on $50,000 beds, geisha girls and fancy coffees.

So lucky to get out of there just before the door slammed shut for good.

Of course I got out because I was paying attention. Something was fishy. That's why I'm paying attention to the blocksize controversy now. 



3095. Post 13283606 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

It just occurred to me that @$456, assuming miners are on average selling all their coins, the market has to absorb $1.6 million in sales just to stay at the same price.  You gotta wonder how long bulls can keep that up, considering we're going to run out of room in blocks in the next couple of months at this rate.



3096. Post 13283695 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: podyx on December 18, 2015, 05:27:34 AM
It just occurred to me that @$456, assuming miners are on average selling all their coins, the market has to absorb $1.6 million in sales just to stay at the same price.  You gotta wonder how long bulls can keep that up, considering we're going to run out of room in blocks in the next couple of months at this rate.


Are you completely obvlious to the fact that we were above that price for a year, even in a bearmarket?



No, I suspect it was a major part of the reason we were in a bear market, actually are still in a bear market at less than 50% of the ATH.  



3097. Post 13287651 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: r0ach on December 18, 2015, 02:33:46 PM
I was right, we are about to do a +10x to $3200


The rising level of xactioins should worry you more than encourage you. Once we get past 4 xactions/sec,  fees will likely double and then quadruple and the market will take that information into account.



3098. Post 13289898 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Karpeles on December 18, 2015, 06:50:14 PM
When will we start to skyrocket again?

I don't know, Newbie. As soon as you start buying, I guess. All I know is that if we don't get a new ATH or a scaling solution by the time of the halving, I'm dumping my cold storage coins.




3099. Post 13289963 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on December 18, 2015, 07:07:34 PM
When will we start to skyrocket again?

I don't know, Newbie. As soon as you start buying, I guess. All I know is that if we don't get a new ATH or a scaling solution by the time of the halving, I'm dumping my cold storage coins.



Shh  don't scare  the newbies man!!!!
What's wrong with you?

My bad. BUY BUY BUY!!!!



3100. Post 13290007 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: podyx on December 18, 2015, 07:11:34 PM
When will we start to skyrocket again?

I don't know, Newbie. As soon as you start buying, I guess. All I know is that if we don't get a new ATH or a scaling solution by the time of the halving, I'm dumping my cold storage coins.



All of them??

Probably. at least 90%. If it don't scale, they're on sale.



3101. Post 13290143 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: podyx on December 18, 2015, 07:26:49 PM
When will we start to skyrocket again?

I don't know, Newbie. As soon as you start buying, I guess. All I know is that if we don't get a new ATH or a scaling solution by the time of the halving, I'm dumping my cold storage coins.



All of them??

Probably. at least 90%. If it don't scale, they're on sale.

Wow, you seem really afraid of it. How come it wasn't anything you feared before? Not aware of it?
You know conflict about the issue is a good thing. If everyone would be quiet about it, it'd be much worse.

Probably. Maybe that's why we crashed so low in the first place. People were trading on the information before I and most everyone else knew about it. And it's very possible that we could go a lot higher before the issue actually affects network performance, but eventually it will.  and then god help anyone caught long. 



3102. Post 13291439 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: rocks on December 18, 2015, 08:45:34 PM
When will we start to skyrocket again?

I don't know, Newbie. As soon as you start buying, I guess. All I know is that if we don't get a new ATH or a scaling solution by the time of the halving, I'm dumping my cold storage coins.



All of them??

Probably. at least 90%. If it don't scale, they're on sale.
Agreed, Why anyone would be heavily invested in an artificially capped currency that most people can not use is beyond me.

Remember a fee market does not work. A fee market simply prices people out, it decides who can use and who cannot use Bitcoin. If Maxwell succeeds and forking Bitcoin from it's vision as a true P2P currency that anyone can use, then I'm out. And I've very been buying since 2011.

But it probably won't come to that, there are enough people that want to scale bitcoin that it will happen one way or another. If the core devs refuse to follow the wants of the user base, I could see a user led fork happening. If that happens I dump my long term coins on Maxwellcoin and hold them on the large block chain. Could be the best trade ever.

Word, Brother. I'm with you. A fee market will have to work at some point when the block reward goes away, but there aren't nearly enough people involved yet by several orders of magnitude. It's too greedy to monetize before we hit a critical mass and that plays right into the hands of our competition.






3103. Post 13291598 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 18, 2015, 10:00:57 PM
A while ago I was sitting in front of a block explorer seeing the transactions as they happened in real time, in USD terms... there were many 0.03, 0.07$ transactions etc. This is bullshit.

Cry me a river. What is the line between not-bullshit and bullshit? I don't measure it in size of transaction, I measure it in number of transactions. Do you personally run a full node? I do. If you do not personally run a node, WTF do you care about number of transactions? If you do, then why are you so damned cheap to spend another $USD 10 on HDD space, and another $USD 0.50/mo on bandwidth - especially as you're so incensed about small-value transactions?

I do too. SwampNode is running BitcoinXT.  Cost me $118 bucks, so any crybabies whining about the node problem can stop wasting their time. 



3104. Post 13291741 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on December 18, 2015, 10:12:57 PM
A while ago I was sitting in front of a block explorer seeing the transactions as they happened in real time, in USD terms... there were many 0.03, 0.07$ transactions etc. This is bullshit.

Cry me a river. What is the line between not-bullshit and bullshit? I don't measure it in size of transaction, I measure it in number of transactions. Do you personally run a full node? I do. If you do not personally run a node, WTF do you care about number of transactions? If you do, then why are you so damned cheap to spend another $USD 10 on HDD space, and another $USD 0.50/mo on bandwidth - especially as you're so incensed about small-value transactions?

I do too. SwampNode is running BitcoinXT.  Cost me $118 bucks, so any crybabies whining about the node problem can stop wasting their time. 

That's not Bitcoin but GavinCoin.

Fuck off. I know Gavin from 2011. I trust him. It was gavincoin when I bought it and if it's not gavincoin now, then I don't want it anymore. I'll sell the whole way up and still have more coins than most here.



3105. Post 13292200 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on December 18, 2015, 11:09:38 PM
A while ago I was sitting in front of a block explorer seeing the transactions as they happened in real time, in USD terms... there were many 0.03, 0.07$ transactions etc. This is bullshit.

Cry me a river. What is the line between not-bullshit and bullshit? I don't measure it in size of transaction, I measure it in number of transactions. Do you personally run a full node? I do. If you do not personally run a node, WTF do you care about number of transactions? If you do, then why are you so damned cheap to spend another $USD 10 on HDD space, and another $USD 0.50/mo on bandwidth - especially as you're so incensed about small-value transactions?

I do too. SwampNode is running BitcoinXT.  Cost me $118 bucks, so any crybabies whining about the node problem can stop wasting their time. 

That's not Bitcoin but GavinCoin.

Fuck off. I know Gavin from 2011. I trust him. It was gavincoin when I bought it and if it's not gavincoin now, then I don't want it anymore. I'll sell the whole way up and still have more coins than most here.

I hope people like you will sell. May be prices should stay depressed for a few more years to accomplish just that.

People that want a bigger block are just socialists that want their free transactions. Fees is what pays for the security of the network. The block subsidy is temporary. The total value of the fees correlates directly into a level of security. Fees will be lower overall with a larger block size (more supply) so security will be lower. The unique selling point of Bitcoin is security that no power on this planet can break. A payment network that works globally is nothing new and NOT the goal of Bitcoin. The payment network is to bootstrap the store of value. That's all.

No fee doesn't mean free transactions. I paid for those transactions when I bought my stash. I pay for it with every coin I buy now. I was subsidizing the miners so the network can grow. Then you assholes came around and thought Bitcoin could be more useful if fewer people can use it. This isn't the vision I signed up for. This isn't the reason I held on through three crashes.

Over four hundred is a nice profit for me. If you think you can handle it without me, just keep the price this high until I pull my coins out of storage.



3106. Post 13292405 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on December 18, 2015, 11:44:43 PM

No fee doesn't mean free transactions. I paid for those transactions when I bought my stash. I pay for it with every coin I buy now. I was subsidizing the miners so the network can grow. Then you assholes came around and thought Bitcoin could be more useful if fewer people can use it. This isn't the vision I signed up for. This isn't the reason I held on through three crashes.

Over four hundred is a nice profit for me. If you think you can handle it without me, just keep the price this high until I pull my coins out of storage.

These were the rules from when you bought in. Now you guys are trying to change it. Fork the chain and make your own altcoin. If you succeed power to you.

You know damn well those were not the rules. The rules are 21 million coins peer-to-peer electronic cash system.  You're hanging your whole argument on a technicality that was just supposed to be a temporary kludge. 

We've been over and over this. Fuck you. You're the fucking attack vector. Good luck with your cripplecoin. We have the code to do it better now. It's only a matter of time before We Facebook your Myspace ass.



3107. Post 13292421 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 18, 2015, 11:37:39 PM
any trains coming? ccmf, or?

Now's your chance, TERA. You can buy and sell that giant stash of yours with little slippage either way. Oh, that's right. You're already margin long. Well double down I guess.



3108. Post 13292760 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Fees don't compensate for shit if the price is only $200/BTC. 

Good luck getting anymore VC money, much less wall street money for a network that doesn't scale. Good luck with the feds if the only people using it are drug dealers, tax cheats and terrorists. 



3109. Post 13295103 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Sorry, Guys. You can have high prices or you can have high transaction fees, but you can't have both. 
Just hold the price above $400 until I can get my old coins out of cold storage.

I'm outie.



3110. Post 13295213 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on December 19, 2015, 08:41:30 AM
Sorry, Guys. You can have high prices or you can have high transaction fees, but you can't have both. 
Just hold the price above $400 until I can get my old coins out of cold storage.

I'm outie.

"And that, I think, was the handle—that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn’t need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting—on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave. . . .

So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark—that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back."

So that's that? You give up before we even find out if the battle is lost?

The core devs have no incentive to fix the scaling problem if the price is high. You wanna wait until the fee market is in effect and Zuckerberg rolls out FBcoin with zero fees? I'll buy back in when and if the 1MB4EVA crowd cashes out.   I started buying at $6 so my battle is won.

First block over 1MB and I'm back in.



3111. Post 13295599 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: bitebits on December 19, 2015, 10:03:46 AM
Economic considerations should also be given for developing countries where bandwidth costs are high, as are imported technological goods like hard disks, ram and high end CPUs/mobos. The western world doesn't really understand the problem.

Serious question as a 'western world citizen'. How do developing countries use the Internet nowadays? Do they have big hubs and data centers like in the west? Or do they just make use of the Internet as it is hosted in the more developed countries?

Without taking a position in the debate, I can't judge it well enough, it seems like sending and receiving a few kilobytes is plenty for making a transaction.

Gimme a break. My node cost me $118 bucks.



3112. Post 13295646 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: pennywise on December 19, 2015, 09:44:22 AM

The core devs have no incentive to fix the scaling problem if the price is high. You wanna wait until the fee market is in effect and Zuckerberg rolls out FBcoin with zero fees? I'll buy back in when and if the 1MB4EVA crowd cashes out.   I started buying at $6 so my battle is won.

First block over 1MB and I'm back in.

Have you read about the segregated witness implementation yet?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1279444.0

Yeah. Gavin says it's a cool idea and needs to be tested, but he also said it wasn't enough to fix the problem. That is a long way off from implementation if it ever happens and blocks will be full before then. ANY patch seems to be too controversial to implement. If the rough consensus attack continues, the differences in opinion can be exploited to ensure it doesn't happen.




3113. Post 13296519 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: acquafredda on December 19, 2015, 11:47:02 AM
Economic considerations should also be given for developing countries where bandwidth costs are high, as are imported technological goods like hard disks, ram and high end CPUs/mobos. The western world doesn't really understand the problem.

Serious question as a 'western world citizen'. How do developing countries use the Internet nowadays? Do they have big hubs and data centers like in the west? Or do they just make use of the Internet as it is hosted in the more developed countries?

Without taking a position in the debate, I can't judge it well enough, it seems like sending and receiving a few kilobytes is plenty for making a transaction.

Gimme a break. My node cost me $118 bucks.

Good contribution to the cause but don't you think that for someone who bought in a 6$, maintaining a node at the price is very cheap? Unless you are out of money and in that case I'd understand.

The reason I have money is because I'm cheap. That's how real capital formation is done. 



3114. Post 13306030 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 20, 2015, 11:29:30 AM
So I just made $500 playing holdem, again. Anyone have a better story?

Yeah. I just sold 1.2 BTC on Bitquick that I paid $11 for. Got $610.




3115. Post 13306086 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 20, 2015, 10:13:27 AM

Chilling words from the merchant of evil: Tim Cook

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQebmygKq7A

we're America we should have both privacy AND national security.

.... can't the government just do their damn jobs and stop blaming their messed up shit on the people wanting privacy and freedom?

Can't the core devs just do their damn jobs and fix the scaling problem?



3116. Post 13306154 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 20, 2015, 12:35:47 PM
Looks like the influx of market buys stopped, so it's just in this really slow freefall. Bears will get behind every $1 of this drop to 'confirm' downtrend after downtrend until one day there is just this violent correction all the way back to the upside. Very risky game.

It's risky both ways. You're the trader, TERA. I'm the investor. The fundamentals do not look good. What's going to happen to the price when the network hits the 1MB limit? You used to mine. You have to know the implications of a network that can't support more than 1/2 million active users no matter how high the xaction fees go.






3117. Post 13309259 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 20, 2015, 07:06:19 PM
Follow the weekly Bitstamp chart. If it closes green for 6 times in a row, we are on bubble territory (currently 4 consecutive weekly greens). If we instead end this week in red, there is nothing to worry.

IF we get 6 greens, this means we can go on for a long time still but watch for a blowoff top and trade accordingly.

The methodology worked perfect in the latest 500 spike, and you can easily check a very good match with all previous bubbles as well.

First TERA and now Risto- we're getting the band back together!



3118. Post 13309518 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on December 20, 2015, 07:50:13 PM
Follow the weekly Bitstamp chart. If it closes green for 6 times in a row, we are on bubble territory (currently 4 consecutive weekly greens). If we instead end this week in red, there is nothing to worry.

IF we get 6 greens, this means we can go on for a long time still but watch for a blowoff top and trade accordingly.

The methodology worked perfect in the latest 500 spike, and you can easily check a very good match with all previous bubbles as well.

First TERA and now Risto- we're getting the band back together!

no better indicator of a bull market than old-timers becoming active again Smiley

Hold on there, Pardner.  Don't confuse cause and effect. All that means is the price is higher.  The bull market isn't really back until the ATH is topped.  That won't happen without a scaling fix because long before we get to four digits, we'll slam into the 1MB blocksize limit. 

When the blocks are totally full, the fees could go up 100X what they are now because there is only enough capacity for ~600,000 transactions per day.  That's it, no matter how high the fees go, there won't be enough capacity for each of us to have even one xation/day each. NO MATTER HOW HIGH THE FEES GO.

You don't wait until the snow starts falling before you start chopping firewood. It's coming.




3119. Post 13309575 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on December 20, 2015, 08:09:41 PM
Follow the weekly Bitstamp chart. If it closes green for 6 times in a row, we are on bubble territory (currently 4 consecutive weekly greens). If we instead end this week in red, there is nothing to worry.

IF we get 6 greens, this means we can go on for a long time still but watch for a blowoff top and trade accordingly.

The methodology worked perfect in the latest 500 spike, and you can easily check a very good match with all previous bubbles as well.

First TERA and now Risto- we're getting the band back together!

no better indicator of a bull market than old-timers becoming active again Smiley

Hold on there, Pardner.  Don't confuse cause and effect. All that means is the price is higher.  The bull market isn't really back until the ATH is topped.  That won't happen without a scaling fix because long before we get to four digits, we'll slam into the 1MB blocksize limit. 

When the blocks are totally full, the fees could go up 100X what they are now because there is only enough capacity for ~600,000 transactions per day.  That's it, no matter how high the fees go, there won't be enough capacity for each of us to have even one xation/day each. NO MATTER HOW HIGH THE FEES GO.

You don't wait until the snow starts falling before you start chopping firewood. It's coming.



I imagine you've fallen into some sort of math hole here.

Maybe I have. Check my math: 7TPS. 60 sec/min. 60 min/hr. 24 hr/day.

7*60*60*24= 604,800 transactions/day  Am I missing something?



3120. Post 13309643 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on December 20, 2015, 08:20:46 PM
Follow the weekly Bitstamp chart. If it closes green for 6 times in a row, we are on bubble territory (currently 4 consecutive weekly greens). If we instead end this week in red, there is nothing to worry.

IF we get 6 greens, this means we can go on for a long time still but watch for a blowoff top and trade accordingly.

The methodology worked perfect in the latest 500 spike, and you can easily check a very good match with all previous bubbles as well.

First TERA and now Risto- we're getting the band back together!

no better indicator of a bull market than old-timers becoming active again Smiley

Hold on there, Pardner.  Don't confuse cause and effect. All that means is the price is higher.  The bull market isn't really back until the ATH is topped.  That won't happen without a scaling fix because long before we get to four digits, we'll slam into the 1MB blocksize limit. 

When the blocks are totally full, the fees could go up 100X what they are now because there is only enough capacity for ~600,000 transactions per day.  That's it, no matter how high the fees go, there won't be enough capacity for each of us to have even one xation/day each. NO MATTER HOW HIGH THE FEES GO.

You don't wait until the snow starts falling before you start chopping firewood. It's coming.

Assuming inelastic demand for bitcoin transactions is wrong. If fees go high enough, there will be plenty of room in 1 MB blocks. There will also probably be plenty of cheap coins in this situation.

Realistically, the network's actual capacity in current form is more like 2.7 tps.

That's exactly my point. You can have high BTC prices or you can have high xaction fees, but you can't have both. 



3121. Post 13309809 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on December 20, 2015, 08:40:15 PM
Follow the weekly Bitstamp chart. If it closes green for 6 times in a row, we are on bubble territory (currently 4 consecutive weekly greens). If we instead end this week in red, there is nothing to worry.

IF we get 6 greens, this means we can go on for a long time still but watch for a blowoff top and trade accordingly.

The methodology worked perfect in the latest 500 spike, and you can easily check a very good match with all previous bubbles as well.

First TERA and now Risto- we're getting the band back together!

no better indicator of a bull market than old-timers becoming active again Smiley

Hold on there, Pardner.  Don't confuse cause and effect. All that means is the price is higher.  The bull market isn't really back until the ATH is topped.  That won't happen without a scaling fix because long before we get to four digits, we'll slam into the 1MB blocksize limit.  

When the blocks are totally full, the fees could go up 100X what they are now because there is only enough capacity for ~600,000 transactions per day.  That's it, no matter how high the fees go, there won't be enough capacity for each of us to have even one xation/day each. NO MATTER HOW HIGH THE FEES GO.

You don't wait until the snow starts falling before you start chopping firewood. It's coming.

We will see. I am not so pessimistic about the issue of scaling. Guess I simply have more faith in the ability of decentralized systems to provide adequate answers for problems posed by the environment. Might also mean I'm more naive.

For the time being I see price catching up with development of infrastructure and I'm cheering from the sidelines.

And to be honest I feel like bull markets in Bitcoin started well before breaching the old ATH - that's just when they started to go crazy parabolic and made a new ATH within 2 months.

Well, yeah. What will likely happen is that the 1 MB limit will be reached, the network will bog down, the price will crash. The miners will switch to BIP101 or BitcoinXT or something and then the price will recover. I just don't see the change that needs to happen, which is some kind of scaling solution, without a major market impetus. We have a shitload of money on the line and it makes us conservative.

The 1 MB limit will go away. What we don't know is if it will go away before or after a competing altcoin with no limit or a higher limit starts to eat Bitcoin's market share.



3122. Post 13310014 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on December 20, 2015, 09:03:51 PM
Well, yeah. What will likely happen is that the 1 MB limit will be reached, the network will bog down, the price will crash. The miners will switch to BIP101 or BitcoinXT or something and then the price will recover. I just don't see the change that needs to happen, which is some kind of scaling solution, without a major market impetus. We have a shitload of money on the line and it makes us conservative.

The 1 MB limit will go away. What we don't know is if it will go away before or after a competing altcoin with no limit or a higher limit starts to eat Bitcoin's market share.

We don't know what will happen but won't it be exciting to witness how these events will unfold? Smiley

I have my popcorn ready.


I know what will happen but it will be interesting to see HOW it happens.

Bitcoin will scale or die.



3123. Post 13310390 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions?timespan=all&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

We're going to see a noticeable slowdown in confirmation times or a noticeable increase in fees by the time we hit 300,000 Transactions/day. By the time we hit 400,000 TPD,  This slowdown or fee increase will be dramatic and with current code, 500,000 may not even be possible.

With high fees and/or slow confirmations, MOST of the current business models of the major bitcoin companies (Coinbase, Circle, 21, Bitpay etc) will be unworkable. 

There isn't anything close to a consensus on anyway to fix this. There isn't even a consensus that it needs to be fixed. 

Expecting Bitcoin to rally into four or even five digits before the scaling problem is corrected is like expecting a Boeing 777 to take off in your driveway. We're gonna run out of road before we get above stalling speed.



3124. Post 13310573 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 20, 2015, 10:36:10 PM
https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions?timespan=all&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

We're going to see a noticeable slowdown in confirmation times or a noticeable increase in fees by the time we hit 300,000 Transactions/day. By the time we hit 400,000 TPD,  This slowdown or fee increase will be dramatic and with current code, 500,000 may not even be possible.

With high fees and/or slow confirmations, MOST of the current business models of the major bitcoin companies (Coinbase, Circle, 21, Bitpay etc) will be unworkable.  

There isn't anything close to a consensus on anyway to fix this. There isn't even a consensus that it needs to be fixed.  

Expecting Bitcoin to rally into four or even five digits before the scaling problem is corrected is like expecting a Boeing 777 to take off in your driveway. We're gonna run out of road before we get above stalling speed.

You are using a chart that has a hidden story behind it and pretend like that story doesn't even exist.

The hidden story is that most of the transactions there are bogus, spam, dust, very low to no-fee, etc.

So to get the true representation you must know the ratio of normal transactions vs the spam/dust transactions within the capacity limit.

What will actually happen is that the ratio of the quality of txs will shift internally, within the prescribed limit. So if you have something like half a million of txs per day as a limit, and you currently have just 100k normal transactions per day (with the other 100-150k being bogus/spam/dust), then you have a 5x margin to hit the actual limit, when dust/spam/attacks are priced out and become uneconomical to execute.

If you are always considering dust/spam/bogus/attack txs to be the same in quality, then you could have an increase to 2MB tomorrow morning and by tomorrow evening someone could be filling the extra mb with "stress test" junk txs. That would prove what? That "Bitcoin is at its limit"? Just because someone has filled the new TPD limit with another 500k bogus transactions? No. It would only prove that if your block size supply is much larger than block size demand, then you can have plenty of free riders in that space. And those free riders will be using that space irresponsibly. Why not, anyway, since they aren't paying much for doing so...

Are you paying attention to yourself?  If we have a limit of 500K TPD, then that means there are really less than a million actual bitcoiners out there after six fucking years. All of the promise of smartcontracts, colored coins for equities and derivitives trading, title transfers, timestamps, banking the unbanked, it's all bullshit. You think those small xactions are garbage/dust, but you have no idea what they mean to the people involved.

I believe that the current market price reflects the discounted potential future value of bitcoin's use as the internet of money, not just some settlement system for digital gold. That's a huge difference in potential and I don't think the market has priced that in yet. I think most speculators believe this issue will be resolved before it becomes a major problem, but people like you convince me that it's not true. As long as you're being taken seriously, then you represent a threat that I have to take seriously.




3125. Post 13311168 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 20, 2015, 11:33:18 PM
Are you paying attention to yourself?  If we have a limit of 500K TPD, then that means there are really less than a million actual bitcoiners out there after six fucking years.

Bitcoin got mainstream attention around 2013. So the first 4 years were a bunch of nerds.

Quote
All of the promise of smartcontracts, colored coins for equities and derivitives trading, title transfers, timestamps, banking the unbanked, it's all bullshit. You think those small xactions are garbage/dust, but you have no idea what they mean to the people involved.

It's not bullshit. They can be served by the Bitcoin technology, perhaps in other blockchains. It's not necessary to have everything in just one blockchain. From what I've read I never got the impression that Satoshi was envisioning putting all kind of crap into the blockchain.

Quote
I believe that the current market price reflects the discounted potential future value of bitcoin's use as the internet of money, not just some settlement system for digital gold.

Since the scaling debate got larger with the XT fork drama, and especially after XT got no traction, price has gone up significantly. Most people (obviously not you) trust the the core devs will do the things that are right for the future of bitcoin. If there is a problem, they'll fix it or find a solution. They work their ass off to maintain it, evolve it, make it faster and allow it to scale better. It is illogical to even propose that they want to purposefully bury it and cripple it, so that years worth of work will go down the drain. If they have a disagreement, and if the matter isn't pressing (and in this case IT ISN'T, since 1MB blocks get full with junk), they can sort it out through dialogue and consensus.

Quote
That's a huge difference in potential and I don't think the market has priced that in yet. I think most speculators believe this issue will be resolved before it becomes a major problem

That's the consensus, yes. Even the core devs have coins or vested interest in BTC. Why would they want their "child" to go down or be problematic? So far they are doing a pretty good job of maintaining order and introducing improvements, while also not breaking consensus. That's not as easy as it sounds.

We've been over and over this. There's no reason why the blockchain has to be small.  Not when broadband is ubiquitous. Not when 1TB hard drives cost less than a carton of smokes.  My XTnode cost me $118 bucks. The cost is trivial, and even if it becomes less trivial, nodes will still be run because those of us with an incentive to keep the network operating smoothly will do so. Someday a bitcoin node may be the size of a google datacenter. So what? Google seems to be doing pretty well.  They don't seem to care that most searches aren't for anything important.

You don't seem to understand certain things, like why aren't blocks filling up now when fees are either zero or near zero. The risk of orphaned blocks is real. it happens all the time.  It's because miners can chose how big to make their blocks now by deciding which transactions to include.  Miners, smart miners, most miners don't care about what percentage of their compensation comes from block reward and which part comes from fees. They only care about ROI, like any sane businessman. If they can make more money from bigger blocks, they'll do it. If they can make more money from smaller blocks, they'll do that. 

You want to keeps blocks small to make stress tests less likely. Why? Stress tests are a good thing. They are important for determining the safety and security of the network.  And as for spam attacks, what's more likely to crash a network, one with the capacity to handle the attack or one that can't?

I'm not even talking to you. You seem to be hopeless. Only a crash will convince you of your error. I just hope some of the others reading this will see what's really going on and what's really at stake.

Bitcoin had an issue early on that a spam attack could threaten the network because the bitcoin price was almost nothing and dust back then really was dust. It's not anymore. There's a huge difference between a $0.000002 transaction  and a $0.02 xaction, so this is no longer the case and the 1MB cap is no longer necessary.  There is a natural limit to blocksize called the risk of orphan rate. Larger blocks take longer to propagate through the network and so have a higher risk of being orphaned. This is what keeps miners from including any and every transaction unless there is a lot of extra room in the block.

We get spam email because email is free. If email cost a penny, we would get a lot less spam, but the cost of email would still be negligible.  "dust" transactions are actually ANTI-spam in some cases. In other cases they are timestamps or title transfers of property worth much more than the nominal value of the coins sent.

A half million transaction/day isn't enough for bitcoin to be anything more than a hobby network. Nobody can build a business model around Bitcoin now without knowing what the future capacity will be. People need to plan.




3126. Post 13311204 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Damn. $433. I'm glad TERA made that $500 playing poker because she's losing her ass unless she closed her long position when the 4HR moving average turned negative.



3127. Post 13311330 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: dropt on December 21, 2015, 12:49:04 AM
If we have a limit of 500K TPD, then that means there are really less than a million actual bitcoiners out there after six fucking years.
No, it actually doesn't.  This is a construct in your head and you'd be better off dismissing it.



We differ on definitions. There's less than million people who use the Bitcoion blockchain once a day on average (assuming two people are involved in every transactions and that's not always the case when folks move their own money around).

Let's say there was a large exchange that was revealed to be insolvent and the panicked traders had one day to get their coins out.  If their was over half a million of them, could they do it? Nope. Not even if the xaction fee was 50%.





3128. Post 13311559 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

So what's the probability of Bitcoin becoming the World Reserve Currency if the on chain transaction capacity is 500,000/day? Zero. The IMF's SDR has a higher capacity than that nowand most people don't even know what the hell I'm talking about.

With eight billion people on the planet, that would be only 1 transaction per day for every 8,000 people ( 2 people per xaction).  or one send and one recieve for only 1 in 16,000 people.  That means that almost everything would be handled by middlemen, the same bankster assholes Bitcoin was created to route around.






3129. Post 13311671 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 21, 2015, 01:38:02 AM

Quote
A half million transaction/day isn't enough for bitcoin to be anything more than a hobby network.

How many txs do you want it to handle per day?

I want the capacity to go up at a predictable predetermined rate. Entrepreneurs can plan with that.


Quote

All the bitcoin developers want Bitcoin to scale and there is 100% consensus on that. This practically guarantees it will happen, despite their differences on whether the blocksize should be raised now, raised temporarily (kicking the can), raised later, have something else done, etc etc.

The precise numbers on how scaling will go down on 5 years, 10 years, 20 years are pretty much unknown but that will not stop investments or businesses.

I don't believe it. Even a 2MB kick-the-can increase would show that they are actually willing to make a permanent fix it at some point. This is far from certain now. If there is 100% consensus that the developers want it to scale, then why haven't they publicly made a joint statement to that effect? 

If there is an actually ongoing rough consensus attack on the network, and I think there is a real possibility that there is, then we would expect to see exactly what we are seeing from core. My ex wife used to deal with beggars not by saying "no", but by saying "not now".  It made them go away easier.  She never gave them any money ever.  It's kinda like that.




3130. Post 13311741 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on December 21, 2015, 02:01:31 AM
So what's the probability of Bitcoin becoming the World Reserve Currency if the on chain transaction capacity is 500,000/day? Zero. The IMF's SDR has a higher capacity than that nowand most people don't even know what the hell I'm talking about.

With eight billion people on the planet, that would be only 1 transaction per day for every 8,000 people ( 2 people per xaction).  or one send and one recieve for only 1 in 16,000 people.  That means that almost everything would be handled by middlemen, the same bankster assholes Bitcoin was created to route around.





It seems to be all or nothing with you. So many infinitive statements, do you realize there are many people everyday that don't make any transactions in fiat or otherwise. The population of the planet is one of the extreme stances you take, clearly you can only think in terms of worst case scenarios.

Really starts to become tiresome reading the same level of thinking over and over again; weren't we supposed to be observing a wall or something?

Hyperbole isn't intended to be taken literally. It's used to make a point.  If a logical case is still valid at the extremes, it is valid in most other cases also.   offchain, sidechain and altcoin solutions re-introduce middlemen.  That is a form of centralization every bit as dangerous as mining centralization. It also adds friction to transactions which hurts trade.



3131. Post 13311789 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on December 21, 2015, 02:02:45 AM

There are real concerns about maliciously formed 8MB blocks made by a dominant selfish miner. IMO it would be a miner acting against their interest in continued income, but the possibility is there, and the worry is not completely unfounded.

It's greatly diminished at 2MB, so I think that's a good compromise to buy some time and allow us to stop obsessing and fighting for a while.

Yeah, that would give him a big head start  on mining the next block, but at a high risk of getting the big one orphaned.  This is the same kind of concern we heard ad nauseum over mining pools in the first place. The risk isn't zero, but it's pretty small relative to the risks of not allowing bigger blocks.



3132. Post 13311829 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on December 21, 2015, 02:15:56 AM

Are you also under the impression that BitPay hurts the trade of BTC?

Not if people have the option of not using it.  Paying for convenience and paying for access are two different things.



3133. Post 13311910 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

I can just imagine what banksters like Blythe Masters are thinking: "Thanks for the great idea kids, but we'll take it from here. You can play in your 1MB yard, but the grownups will handle the real work."




3134. Post 13311929 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

I imagine implementing a rough consensus attack is kind of like jury tampering. If the verdict has to be unanimous, all you have to do is get to one juror.



3135. Post 13312149 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

a little chunk taken out of the 1k wall on BFX. Will it hold?

EDIT: aaaand it's gone.



3136. Post 13312172 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 21, 2015, 03:14:26 AM
I don't know what will happen afterward but I just really want to see someone buy that 1000 wall. It has been too close too long.

Why didn't you buy it?

Quote
The walls never hold when price is moving up against them. That's why I bought the one at 430


Ahh. So I take it you went short when the 4 HR moving average went negative?



3137. Post 13312297 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Watching the change in margin longs and shorts on BFX is the best contraindicator. over 11k in shorts now, so we're likely moving up. Margin longs actually went down.  It seems that leveraged people usually are on the wrong side of the trade.

(shhhh. don't tell everybody. If everybody knows that, it won't work anymore).



3138. Post 13312345 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 21, 2015, 04:20:17 AM
I don't know what will happen afterward but I just really want to see someone buy that 1000 wall. It has been too close too long.

Why didn't you buy it?

Quote
The walls never hold when price is moving up against them. That's why I bought the one at 430


Ahh. So I take it you went short when the 4 HR moving average went negative?
No this is my first trade of 2015.

Wow.  The way you've been talking, I thought you bought in the crash to $403 and sold at ~$458.

Thanks for helping to keep the price high until I can get my old coins out of cold storage. The wallet.dat file is incompatible with the new version so I am having a difficult time accessing them. Any ideas?



3139. Post 13312396 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 21, 2015, 04:33:12 AM
I don't know what will happen afterward but I just really want to see someone buy that 1000 wall. It has been too close too long.

Why didn't you buy it?

Quote
The walls never hold when price is moving up against them. That's why I bought the one at 430


Ahh. So I take it you went short when the 4 HR moving average went negative?
No this is my first trade of 2015.

Wow.  The way you've been talking, I thought you bought in the crash to $403 and sold at ~$458.

Thanks for helping to keep the price high until I can get my old coins out of cold storage. The wallet.dat file is incompatible with the new version so I am having a difficult time accessing them. Any ideas?


I would have made that trade too if I wasn't busy cracking open my own cold storage. Except instead of a wallet.dat, it was the passwords that I used to hash my paper wallet key. Luckily the 50th permutation that I tried was the charm.

I don't really understand using a hardware wallet for cold storage.

I agree, but QR codes were not in as common usage back in 2011. 



3140. Post 13312446 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 21, 2015, 04:42:18 AM
You shouldn't print a QR code for your cold storage wallet either.

All I do is generate a random number, write it down, and hash it with a couple mental passwords to make a private key.

Do you really have coins that you haven't touched since 2011?

Yeah, but I check them on blockchain.info every once in a while to make sure they're still there. I only need the public keys to do that.

Be careful with generating random numbers because some of the RND computer functions have been shown to not be truly random. Dice or coins is safer, but it's kind of a pain.



3141. Post 13312542 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 21, 2015, 04:52:20 AM
You shouldn't print a QR code for your cold storage wallet either.

All I do is generate a random number, write it down, and hash it with a couple mental passwords to make a private key.

Do you really have coins that you haven't touched since 2011?

Yeah, but I check them on blockchain.info every once in a while to make sure they're still there.

Be careful with generating random numbers because some of the RND computer functions have been show to not be truly random. Dice or coins is safer, but it's kind of a pain.
I think if you have to do that, then you're not using Bitcoin to its fullest potential.  So what is your plan if they're not there? lol

I know they haven't moved. And I have more than one copy of the wallet.dat file, in case one gets corrupted, so it's only a matter of getting the software to work.

I have an idea that I think will work:
I'm sitting on a fairly good size pile of cash that is in my trading account. I can move two coins for every one I sell. I'll sell one and transfer the other to the exchange and use it to buy one coin on margin. That way I'm not dumping and my exposure to price changes is neutral. The pile of cash will keep me from getting margin called unless the price drops below $10 again and I'll get some scratch to spend while waiting for the next ATH if it ever happens.



3142. Post 13312555 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 21, 2015, 04:55:16 AM
People struggling to access coins from 2011... bullish Huh  Cheesy

he's running an XT node, may as well just send them straight to Uncle Sam now and be done with all the other formalities and hassle ... lol.

I don't have a choice. There's no other BIP101 implementation and it's the only way I can vote for bigger blocks except for dumping my stash and you don't want me to do that, do you?



3143. Post 13315978 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Damn! $5 Million in new margin longs opened up on BFX driving the interest rate to 1/3% DAILY!
that's about 6X what it's been lately.



3144. Post 13317291 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 21, 2015, 04:31:01 PM
Stamp looks bullish! Some fresh fiat arrived or what?  Cool

Long closed, cuz sleep. $1500 profit.

$1500 profit on a (if you timed it perfectly) $20 rise? therefore 75 bitcoins bought and sold? which is a presumably tiny % of your total stash?

motherofgod.png

With leverage you don't need 75btc.
Correct. I'm using leverage on finex. The calls weren't quite as perfect as he said but close. My open/close/profit actually only refers to the leveraged trade. I rarely mess with the principal.




LOL. That's a chart of a classic Four Punch Raid. YOU'RE the four punch raider!  Good thing I'm already sitting in cash.



3145. Post 13317488 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Crash bounce pause spike second bouce. If this follows the pattern, it will drift up to ~ $441 and then drift down and down into the next crash.



3146. Post 13317526 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Richy_T on December 21, 2015, 04:55:21 PM
Besides my last suggestion of using pywallet there is another way of retrieving private keys using some old tools from 2011. There is a tutorial at this link, but it's only for wallets from 2011, not for later versions. That's why the first thing you read in the thread is a warning that it's out of date.

[GUIDE] Simple wallet recovery using bitcointools

It uses some python software called bitcointools to get the job done.

If worse comes to worse, it's possible to just use the BDB tools to dump the database as a text file and pull the private keys from that.

That's what I was thinking.



3147. Post 13317603 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

^^   ^^

Mary had a little lamb.



3148. Post 13318525 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on December 21, 2015, 04:54:50 PM
Crash bounce pause spike second bouce. If this follows the pattern, it will drift up to ~ $441 and then drift down and down into the next crash.

Just sayin'.   ;-)

Don't send me donations. Send them the Dorian Nakamoto fund on my behalf.



3149. Post 13318716 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on December 21, 2015, 06:41:16 PM
Crash bounce pause spike second bouce. If this follows the pattern, it will drift up to ~ $441 and then drift down and down into the next crash.

Just sayin'.   ;-)

Don't send me donations. Send them the Dorian Nakamoto fund on my behalf.

I mean c'mon! Can't y'all acknowledge that I got it EXACTLY right? Where's the love?



3150. Post 13318844 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 21, 2015, 07:10:12 PM
Crash bounce pause spike second bouce. If this follows the pattern, it will drift up to ~ $441 and then drift down and down into the next crash.

Just sayin'.   ;-)

Don't send me donations. Send them the Dorian Nakamoto fund on my behalf.

I mean c'mon! Can't y'all acknowledge that I got it EXACTLY right? Where's the love?


I mean c'mon  - it seems too early to determine whether you were correct, and plus your supposed prediction is too non-specific.

For example, when you say "crash," you did not really specify if you meant down to $433 or below $425 or what?  

Furthermore, you specifically admitted in an earlier post that sometimes you like to employ exaggerations in order to better make a point, so would we know if your prediction was intended as an exaggeration or as a genuine attempt to predict short-term price movements.

Hell if I knew that JJG, I'd trade it myself. Also, I hope I'm wrong. One reason I called it is so TERA and whoever else is doing it will stop. I still need to unload my cold storage coins.



3151. Post 13320186 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: klee on December 21, 2015, 10:04:38 PM
https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-core/capacity-increases

Didn't see Gavin's name on that list.

"Since Bitcoin is an electronic cash, it _isn't_ a generic database;
the demand for cheap highly-replicated perpetual storage is unbounded,
and Bitcoin cannot and will not satisfy that demand for non-ecash
(non-Bitcoin) usage
, and there is no shame in that. Fortunately, Bitcoin
can interoperate with other systems that address other applications,
and--with luck and hard work--the Bitcoin system can and will satisfy
the world's demand for electronic cash."

So Internet money, not the Internet of money.  This is a mutiny. Imagine what would happen if the Federal Reserve Board of Directors staged a mutiny like that against Janet Yellen. How would the markets react?






3152. Post 13320286 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

If colored coins, title transfers, and timestamps are out, it's just a less useful technology.

Screw this.  Taking the megawatt rating of the network into account, there is an effective >$3 cost per transaction now. If we moved to 8 MB blocks, that cost per transaction would go down to ~40 cents.  You expect holders to subsidize transactions at that cost? Not me. Not for bogus reasons.




3153. Post 13320523 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

You smallblock cripplecoiners don't get it. I can't lose. If the price goes down, it's a market rejection of your vision. If it goes up, I can sell. I don't have to buy another single bitcoin now. 

Whenever something sells on Bitquick, I can rebuy with my trading account cash on BFX. When that runs out, I'll start selling from cold storage. I can sell for a looooong time before I run out. I got your asses. 





3154. Post 13320539 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on December 21, 2015, 11:03:33 PM
@BJA Tim Swanson wrote a paper about how adding exogenous value onto a network that cannot detect and dynamically protect the exogenous value is a bad idea. It was hard to disagree.

Quote
The metacoins and colored coin projects listed above unquestionably increase the social value
of the chain, yet they do not proportionally incentivize security beyond the existing block
reward (seigniorage) subsidy.  This could lead to an economic incentive to attack the chain, a
type of fat tail risk that could dramatically impact any layer residing on top of the Bitcoin
network.




The network is ridiculously oversecure for it's current market cap.  How many goddamn exaflops or whatever?

You might be able to snow the noobs with technobabble but I've been around too long. I'm not buying.



3155. Post 13320648 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on December 21, 2015, 11:27:56 PM
@BJA Tim Swanson wrote a paper about how adding exogenous value onto a network that cannot detect and dynamically protect the exogenous value is a bad idea. It was hard to disagree.

Quote
The metacoins and colored coin projects listed above unquestionably increase the social value
of the chain, yet they do not proportionally incentivize security beyond the existing block
reward (seigniorage) subsidy.  This could lead to an economic incentive to attack the chain, a
type of fat tail risk that could dramatically impact any layer residing on top of the Bitcoin
network.




The network is ridiculously oversecure for it's current market cap.  How many goddamn exaflops or whatever?

You might be able to snow the noobs with technobabble but I've been around too long. I'm not buying.

Security is the most important feature. Without a block subsidy today the Bitcoin network would be extremely insecure. The subsidy is going to go away. I want Bitcoin to work long term. It doesnt seem that those that want to increase the block size want that....

You don't overinsure a house for fire damage. It's called "moral hazard" and it makes the house statistically MORE likely to burn.  You don't put a $1000 case ona $100 phone. It means someone will be MORE likely to steal it. If you put too much armor on an armored truck, you limit it's cargo capacity to the point that you have to make two trips INCREASING the chance of losing the cargo. There IS such a thing as too much security.



3156. Post 13320890 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 21, 2015, 11:55:59 PM
...snip ... blah-de-blah bear rant ... snip

So Internet money, not the Internet of money.  This is a mutiny. Imagine what would happen if the Federal Reserve Board of Directors staged a mutiny like that against Janet Yellen. How would the markets react?


so still short then?

I closed that bitch. Sitting in sweet cash, Baby! Lent it out to bulls earning vig.



3157. Post 13320934 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 22, 2015, 12:11:12 AM
You smallblock cripplecoiners don't get it. I can't lose. If the price goes down, it's a market rejection of your vision. If it goes up, I can sell. I don't have to buy another single bitcoin now. 

Whenever something sells on Bitquick, I can rebuy with my trading account cash on BFX. When that runs out, I'll start selling from cold storage. I can sell for a looooong time before I run out. I got your asses. 






Why not just hurry the fuck up and stop making excuses to troll us with your bullshit broken record. 

Sell your BTC and get the fuck out of here.  What good are you doing anyone whining and complaining with your feigned bitterness and ongoing assertions of self-righteousness.

It's getting a bit old.... but I suppose that is the point of the more subtle trolls to annoy about quasi-irrelevant topics.

I earned the right to be here, Pal. Not everyone who tells you things you don't want to hear is your enemy.



3158. Post 13321019 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 22, 2015, 12:26:30 AM
You smallblock cripplecoiners don't get it. I can't lose. If the price goes down, it's a market rejection of your vision. If it goes up, I can sell. I don't have to buy another single bitcoin now. 

Whenever something sells on Bitquick, I can rebuy with my trading account cash on BFX. When that runs out, I'll start selling from cold storage. I can sell for a looooong time before I run out. I got your asses. 


Why not just hurry the fuck up and stop making excuses to troll us with your bullshit broken record. 

Sell your BTC and get the fuck out of here.  What good are you doing anyone whining and complaining with your feigned bitterness and ongoing assertions of self-righteousness.

It's getting a bit old.... but I suppose that is the point of the more subtle trolls to annoy about quasi-irrelevant topics.

I earned the right to be here, Pal. Not everyone who tells you things you don't want to hear is your enemy.

I'm not sure that the big-blocks-yesterday camp has any bullets left except to hang around as a vindictive, toxic remnant to a settled debate. In fact, if they are not going to go forward with the technical consensus then they probably should be seen as external actors actively looking to destablise and hinder bitcoin's progress.

When the herd is heading towards you either get out of the way or start running in their direction.

Get on board or get out of the way.

I've been on board for four and a half years. I'm not bitter at all. Pump it all you want. More money for me, Holmes. But with that 2-4-8 plan, i don't see how you can stop Bitcoin being used for non-cash purposes.   



3159. Post 13321155 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

From my understanding, there is going to be an intentional wait until blocks are full before there will be any increase in capacity so the fee market can develop. That will be interesting. 

Getting popcorn.



3160. Post 13321320 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

The thing that I keep wondering about is this: What if demand for blockspace isn't as elastic as is commonly believed?

Isn't having a committee set network capacity kind of the the FOMC setting interest rate policy?



3161. Post 13321574 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 22, 2015, 12:46:40 AM
@BJA Tim Swanson wrote a paper about how adding exogenous value onto a network that cannot detect and dynamically protect the exogenous value is a bad idea. It was hard to disagree.

Quote
The metacoins and colored coin projects listed above unquestionably increase the social value
of the chain, yet they do not proportionally incentivize security beyond the existing block
reward (seigniorage) subsidy.  This could lead to an economic incentive to attack the chain, a
type of fat tail risk that could dramatically impact any layer residing on top of the Bitcoin
network.




The network is ridiculously oversecure for it's current market cap.  How many goddamn exaflops or whatever?

You might be able to snow the noobs with technobabble but I've been around too long. I'm not buying.

Security is the most important feature. Without a block subsidy today the Bitcoin network would be extremely insecure. The subsidy is going to go away. I want Bitcoin to work long term. It doesnt seem that those that want to increase the block size want that....

You don't overinsure a house for fire damage. It's called "moral hazard" and it makes the house statistically MORE likely to burn.  You don't put a $1000 case ona $100 phone. It means someone will be MORE likely to steal it. If you put too much armor on an armored truck, you limit it's cargo capacity to the point that you have to make two trips INCREASING the chance of losing the cargo. There IS such a thing as too much security.



Sometimes you make really out of touch assertions.


Why the fuck is bitcoin "over" secure?  it's to support a higher priced market cap, both anticipated and likely to happen.  Therefore, when BTC's market cap reaches $200 billion (that is about $15,000 per BTC), then the computing power is going to be able to sustain security for those potential and likely attacks.

In other words, BTC's computing power and/or security is likely already in a position to support a $10k btc, and probably a lot more - which really means that you should be preparing your moon boots, rather than coming up with lame and misfitting analogies.


The market decides how secure bitcoin ought to be by deciding what hash rate we want to pay for. We buy bitcoin, Bitcoin price goes up, more competition for blocks, higher difficulty, higher hash rate.  Now if the price tanks, you can expect the market to be less secure because the difficulty level will go down. 

Well, I for one don't want to pay for security I don't need. I'm not a terrorist or a drug dealer and I think the risk of big block exploitations is smaller than the risk of small block exploitations.  Maybe I'm wrong and somebody's going to get my "cheap" coins. That's fine. All free trade is win-win or it doesn't happen.



3162. Post 13322123 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Richy_T on December 22, 2015, 03:11:48 AM
From my understanding, there is going to be an intentional wait until blocks are full before there will be any increase in capacity so the fee market can develop. That will be interesting. 

Getting popcorn.

I think it's fairly likely at this late stage that we'll see increasing backlogs until the price tanks and miners switch to BIP101 as an emergency measure. Even then, we have at least a 750 block wait. For the first time in 3 years, I'm reconsidering my strong HODL position. Though I might just put some $ on standby.

That's a realistic scenario, IMHO.  At least if we see it coming we will be less likely to panic.



3163. Post 13322349 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 22, 2015, 03:29:35 AM





Sometimes you are so fucking contradictory that I am not even sure whether you can recognize your own lack of coherence.


You claim to be a libertarian and wanting to allow the free "market" to cause effects within such amorphous powers, then at the same time, you are complaining that the free market is over doing the bitcoin computing power because, in your infinite wisdom, they are too secure and "they" are causing you to have to pay more than is necessary in some amorphous and unsubstantiated claim that you have about having extra costs on yourself and presumably other bitcoin users... and what the fuck does it matter anyhow? even if there happens to develop 10x the computing power (excess capacity) to secure the blockchain, because these various individuals have been making their own internal calculations and they have been deciding to take various risks on the gamble that they are going to profit from such apparently excessive cumulative investment of mining power. 

Who gives a shit?  In the end, if we leave it to such free market and let individuals to decide for themselves if it is worth it to them to keep investing in mining,  it is all going to work itself out, no?, and some balance between price and security will work itself out, no?, without you trying to dictate what you believe is best. 

like you said, you can vote with your feet too, and leave bitcoin, which would surely be nice for you to exercise such option instead of continuing to propound end-of-the world ideas about the bitcoin network supposedly being developed as too secure.

Markets, aren't perfect, but they are better than planned economies.  It's Hyek's economic calculation problem.  Prices convey information. I thought I was paying for blockspace when I was paying for bitcoin, but if I have to pay twice, well, that's a price I'm not yet willing to pay.  I guess we'll find out if anyone else is willing to pay twice but I'd rather watch that from the sidelines.

NOBODY HAS YET SHOWN that they are willing to pay high xaction fees. The market WILL decide.

The issue I have to deal with is to get my cash out of a Honk Kong exchange before the network backlog makes that difficult or impossible. So that means I have to sell one here, buy one there to sell the next one here or I expose myself to exchange rate volatility. I suspect that's possibly a reason why the price hasn't tanked yet.

Artificial scarcity of coins in addition to artificial scarcity of blockspace is just too much scarcity for me, so i'm gonna make myself scarce but I gotta cash out first.



3164. Post 13332094 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: rebuilder on December 22, 2015, 03:04:57 PM
...
Pushing for higher miner fees is barking up the wrong tree. Either we manage with lower fees or the system fails, if you ask me. This will be the case regardless of transaction rate.

Can't we just hardfork to a new, better block reward schedule (print more money)?
What good would that do? The mining subsidy is the single biggest reason miners suck off such a large portion of wealth stored in BTC at the moment. Mining subsidy coupled with bullish price expectations, that is. (An inflation-corrected BTCUSD chart would probably be pretty illuminating...)

That's a really good idea. A chart of BTC price over time adjusted by the amount of total BTC in existence at that point in the chart.

SIDE NOTE. Sold some coin today to pay off a few bills. Still positioning myself to wait out the fullblocalypse.





3165. Post 13332216 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: TERA on December 23, 2015, 02:10:32 AM
...
Pushing for higher miner fees is barking up the wrong tree. Either we manage with lower fees or the system fails, if you ask me. This will be the case regardless of transaction rate.

Can't we just hardfork to a new, better block reward schedule (print more money)?
What good would that do? The mining subsidy is the single biggest reason miners suck off such a large portion of wealth stored in BTC at the moment. Mining subsidy coupled with bullish price expectations, that is. (An inflation-corrected BTCUSD chart would probably be pretty illuminating...)

That's a really good idea. A chart of BTC price over time adjusted by the amount of total BTC in existence at that point in the chart.

SIDE NOTE. Sold some coin today to pay off a few bills. Still positioning myself to wait out the fullblocalypse.




Here's a chart of market cap, but I guess you are looking for the opposite effect

https://blockchain.info/en/charts/market-cap?timespan=all&daysAverageString=7&scale=0&address=

I'm not looking for an effect. I'm looking for insight. 



3166. Post 13332273 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: owlcatz on December 23, 2015, 02:29:52 AM

gold makes horrible money.

bulky
hard to secure
can be counterfeited  with relative ease
not fungible ( one 1oz gold coin != another 1oz gold coin )
its value is not recognized by modern society ( want proof go watch the video of the guy trying to sell 1oz for 50$)

gold sucks balls



yeah it's not very fungible to say the least lol.

It's hard to email too. 



3167. Post 13332445 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: suda123 on December 23, 2015, 02:33:17 AM


SO pretty much if we move forward and survive it's bitcoin, if we backtrack in civilization it's Guns and Food.

That reminds me of a quote: "Those who beat their guns into plowshares will plow for those who didn't."



3168. Post 13332601 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

The problem with predicting the EOTWAWKI is that every single prediction is wrong except the last one and even then you're not around to say "I told you so."

Having said that, a few buckets full of vacuum packed beans is pretty cheap insurance.



3169. Post 13332719 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

The purported reason there is supposed to be high fees is so that only monetary transactions are on the chain, but what if the fees get so high that only NON-monetary transactions are on the chain (securities, title xfers)?

How can you stop an immutable database from being used however people want? remove the metadata feature? 



3170. Post 13335693 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Good traders provide a service, which is helping the market to more accurately price things. The price system helps us all to better allocate resources. Bad traders provide the service of paying the good traders.




3171. Post 13339081 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Think of traders as central bankers who only get paid when they do their job well and pay a penalty to the market they serve when they don't.



3172. Post 13341419 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Are you prepared for the fullblocalypse?



3173. Post 13341810 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on December 24, 2015, 12:54:26 AM
sheesh ... trolls don't even get christmas off? ... you guys need to be paid more.

Hey Marcus, Tell me something....

Is SW really simple but hard to explain, or something really complex but simple to explain?  Huh

Complex and hard to explain, but only compared to something less complex and easier to explain.



3174. Post 13341950 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on December 24, 2015, 12:06:53 AM
Someone tell me I'm blowing this out of proportion. A fees market is something we were always going to have to adjust for. Right? And payment channels are the best we can do without compromising security by scaling. Right? Embarrassed



Security naturally goes up with price. Higher price leads to more hashpower. Those fees have to come from somewhere, and they come from BTC price, either by making it lower or making it less high than otherwise.

Throttling the network in the name of security is like fucking for virginity.



3175. Post 13342295 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Do you think it's more reasonable to believe that money is sitting on the sidelines waiting for bitcoin to become more secure or for it to become more usable? 

Are transactions that can't be tracked on the blockchain less secure or more secure?

What is a bigger change to the network, Blockstream sidechains lightning network segwit or relaxing the 1 mb block limit? Which presents a bigger risk?

How many transactions does the Bank of International Settlements handle every day? Is there a limit?

Keep pumping bulltards. I need some more Christmas money.




3176. Post 13342315 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

No damage to me. Not at all. You wanna make it easier for me to rotate out, be my guest.



3177. Post 13342411 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: dropt on December 24, 2015, 02:41:41 AM
Keep pumping bulltards. I need some more Christmas money.

Oh really?

Artificial scarcity of coins in addition to artificial scarcity of blockspace is just too much scarcity for me, so i'm gonna make myself scarce but I gotta cash out first.

I closed that bitch. Sitting in sweet cash, Baby! Lent it out to bulls earning vig.

SIDE NOTE. Sold some coin today to pay off a few bills. Still positioning myself to wait out the fullblocalypse.

Are you prepared for the fullblocalypse?


Yes, really. That cash is sitting on an exchange. I have to get it out. You pump, someone buys the coins I have for sale. I pocket that, use my trading account cash to buy the next batch of coins and eventually get all my cash off the exchange that will either be insolvent or inaccessible after the fullblocalypse. You keep pumping after that, I get to sell my cold storage stash.

A half million transactions/day no matter how high the fees are. That's all we're gonna get. If there's a panic, xaction rate will go UP, making it worse until...fullblocalypse. That's not my idea of securing the network.

Do you think it will be easier to spam attack a network running at 95% capacity or one running at 50% capacity?



3178. Post 13342500 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 24, 2015, 03:05:22 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=12156.msg169810#msg169810
While I share the belief that bitcoin or something very like it will play a major role in the future, I think the road there is going to be a lot rougher.

I imagine we will see a huge boom then a bust, after that those who stick around will build the meaning full economy that will allow bitcoin or its successor to dominate.

I don't care about the busts. I am riding this pig wherever it takes me. If it tanks, I'll have a helluva story to tell. I'm sick of half measures. I'm swinging for the fences and If I strike out, so be it.  I won't be some mediocre drone living a life of quiet desperation. I believe in bitcoin and I'm going for broke, knowing the risks.  

I wonder how much they paid him for his account? Or his soul?

Yeah, that was me. I had no idea there was a scaling problem back then.  The problem with economics isn't that some people are good and others are bad like physics. The problem is that those who are ignorant of economics are ignorant of their ignorance. Smart people are the worst because they think being smart at something like programming means they know economics better, but they don't.

I'm not leaving bitcoin. Bitcoin is leaving me.  No regrets. Thanks for buying my coins at 50X what I paid for them, suckers.



3179. Post 13342551 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

When blocks are full, anyone will be able to shut it down for an hour for $100,000. It will be slow for many hours after that.  That's your idea of security?

What's 100 grand to stop a six billion dollar network?  You just gave the banksters a kill switch.



3180. Post 13342680 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: dropt on December 24, 2015, 03:33:37 AM
When blocks are full, anyone will be able to shut it down for an hour for $100,000. It will be slow for many hours after that.  That's your idea of security?

What's 100 grand to stop a six billion dollar network?  You just gave the banksters a kill switch.

Please show us where, among the numerous previous periods of full blocks, the network was 'stopped'.

It never happened.  End of story.

Edit: Also, what does 'shut it down for half an hour' have to do with 'security'?  When, during this fabricated scenario of yours, did people's coins get stolen from their wallets, or people magically have funds appear in their accounts?

If fees are running 5 BTC/block, you could pay let's say 10 BTC/ block and almost completely fill it up with transactions sending money to yourself. Greedy miners could do this every time the fees got too low and keep the fees at whatever nash equilibrium level they want.

The fee market is just as subject to manipulation as any other market.  Sure, some transaction will just stop being made as no longer cost effective, but some will have to be made no matter what fees are attached. These transactors will continue to try and out bid each other for block space even after the spam attack is over.

So if someone perhaps wants to roll out Bankstercoin, they could dramatically slow down bitcoin for a few hours or days to snag some market share. Or traders could make a big leveraged short along with a spam attack and force a long squeeze.  All it takes is filling up 144 blocks to put the whole network a day behind.

Governments and central banks could kill Bitcoin for weeks with pocket change, just to ensure it never provides a better value than SWIFT, ACH, Western Union or whatever. A tiny fraction of the War on Drugs Budget and the War on Terroism budget could make Bitcoin as unreliable as a third world power grid.  

Previous periods of full blocks didn't have as many people who NEEDED not just wanted the network to work. The more people who NEED it to work, the more vulnerable it is to a spam attack. The blocksize limit is an effective way to not just keep bitcoin small, but to keep it unimportant.








3181. Post 13342724 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on December 24, 2015, 04:09:49 AM
When blocks are full, anyone will be able to shut it down for an hour for $100,000. It will be slow for many hours after that.  That's your idea of security?

What's 100 grand to stop a six billion dollar network?  You just gave the banksters a kill switch.

Please show us where, among the numerous previous periods of full blocks, the network was 'stopped'.

It never happened.  End of story.

Edit: Also, what does 'shut it down for half an hour' have to do with 'security'?  When, during this fabricated scenario of yours, did people's coins get stolen from their wallets, or people magically have funds appear in their accounts?  Is it a security issue when my bankcard doesn't work at a debit machine because the retailer's internet is out?

BJA, hitting the limit isn't an apocalypse. Think of it as a stuck brake caliper. It limits potential, but is not fatal, at least not while first mover advantage is still so strong. As long as people are salivating about the halving... getting much harder to mine... more good press... MMM still a rollin'... this thing could run well further than you expect.

Locking in some profits is never a bad thing, it's a comfort to have some dry powder, and a joy to sell into euphoria. True permabulls don't have a dime to buy panics, they're already all in. I'm pretty sure we'll see sub 440 again, and if not, great... that's what cold storage is for.

Look... I share your frustration with the current dev environment, their crooked incentives, and their merry band of sycophants, but there's no need to throw yourself on the tracks in a show of bravery. If they want to pay you more, might as well take it. I also don't think that the situation is doomed, miners have the incentive and the power to protect their investment by ditching Core™ if the pain becomes pronounced and a reliable alternative presents itself. Bitcoin was designed to route around attempts to control it, let's see if that's true.

I just had a stuck caliper. It set my truck on fire.



3182. Post 13342781 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Nobody has responded to the most relevant part:

Quote
Previous periods of full blocks didn't have as many people who NEEDED not just wanted the network to work. The more people who NEED it to work, the more vulnerable it is to a spam attack. The blocksize limit is an effective way to not just keep bitcoin small, but to keep it unimportant.



3183. Post 13342823 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 24, 2015, 04:27:30 AM
Nobody has responded to the most relevant part:

Quote
Previous periods of full blocks didn't have as many people who NEEDED not just wanted the network to work. The more people who NEED it to work, the more vulnerable it is to a spam attack. The blocksize limit is an effective way to not just keep bitcoin small, but to keep it unimportant.

only about 40% of current TX "need" the network to work. There's plenty of fat to chop away and the spam goes down and gets more costly as fees go up, gosh darn, think about that!

You are not differentiating small legitimate transactions from hostile transactions. What I am saying is that when you get rid of the small legit xactions, the chain still fiils up with large legit transactions as bitcoin grows until it becomes vulnerable to a hostile attack. Those small legit transactions are acting as a buffer and you want to get rid of them.



3184. Post 13342910 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 24, 2015, 04:50:38 AM
Nobody has responded to the most relevant part:

Quote
Previous periods of full blocks didn't have as many people who NEEDED not just wanted the network to work. The more people who NEED it to work, the more vulnerable it is to a spam attack. The blocksize limit is an effective way to not just keep bitcoin small, but to keep it unimportant.

only about 40% of current TX "need" the network to work. There's plenty of fat to chop away and the spam goes down and gets more costly as fees go up, gosh darn, think about that!

You are not differentiating small legitimate transactions from hostile transactions. What I am saying is that when you get rid of the small legit xactions, the chain still fiils up with large legit transactions as bitcoin grows until it becomes vulnerable to a hostile attack. Those small legit transactions are acting as a buffer and you want to get rid of them.

... there is no way to differentiate between "small legit transactions" and fee-paying spam if they pay the same fee, so no, there is no 'buffer' as you are imagining.

And you are thinking all upside-down. Nobody wants "to get rid of" TX ... for the last 6 years free transactions (and yes, abundant spam) have been tolerated and given gold-plated security that only the bitcoin blockchain can provide. At some point, the network becomes saturated because the demand for gold-plated bitcoin TX will for the foreseeable future overcome the network's technological constraints and ability to supply it ... so now the question is "what price?", hence fees.

The block limit is the technological limit that constrains the on-chain capacity, the arise of fees is the free market reaction.

The limit can be changed with one line of code. It is not a technological limit. It is arbitrary and artificial. And if there is no way to tell, then there is no way for you to prove that you are correct. Dust is a buffer because in previous attacks, the legit dust just didn't get processed in many cases and certainly didn't get resubmitted with higher fees, which allowed the network to clear away the backlog. In your settlement network, people will just keep resubmitting with higher and higher fees until some other form of settlement becomes competitively viable and the demand levels off. That's marginal utility, and it makes Bitcoin vulnerable to miner rent-seeking.





3185. Post 13343026 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 24, 2015, 05:08:42 AM
-snip-
The block limit is the technological limit that constrains the on-chain capacity, the arise of fees is the free market reaction.

People representing 90% of global hashrate disagreed during their panel in HK.

The idea that 1MB, "scaling" up to 1.75MB equiv with the gradual rollout of segwit, well into 2017... is the technological limit? That's BS and you know it.

The important part of their plan is that hard forks remain "controversial".


Currently the network node operators are overwhelmingly supporting 1MByte block limits, so that is the reality of the technological limit on the network today.

How that changes in the future is the subject of much debate, as you well know.

I was attempting to get causality straight in BJA's mind.

SwampNode cost me $118.  The "burden" on nodes is laughable. We'll see how much of a burden segwit and  lightning network soft forks are.  If I can give people gold-plated security for pennies, I'll do it. I am doing it. I'll do it on another chain if I can't do it on Bitcoin.

After five years, we've only managed a six billion dollar market cap and you think that first mover advantage is unassailable?  It's greedy, short-sighted, risky and just fucking stupid. All you're doing is giving free R and D to the developers of Bankstercoin.



3186. Post 13343086 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 24, 2015, 05:39:38 AM
-snip-
The block limit is the technological limit that constrains the on-chain capacity, the arise of fees is the free market reaction.

People representing 90% of global hashrate disagreed during their panel in HK.

The idea that 1MB, "scaling" up to 1.75MB equiv with the gradual rollout of segwit, well into 2017... is the technological limit? That's BS and you know it.

The important part of their plan is that hard forks remain "controversial".


Currently the network node operators are overwhelmingly supporting 1MByte block limits, so that is the reality of the technological limit on the network today.

How that changes in the future is the subject of much debate, as you well know.

I was attempting to get causality straight in BJA's mind.

You have to admit that Core has a certain sort of inertia. There's a big chunk of operators still plugging along on previous versions of Core. I also haven't seen an alternative that has the level of ongoing support that I'm comfortable with... so far. I really had high hopes for some kind of good will compromise between the opposing forces (ala garzik), bringing us back together with a common purpose... but it appears that is not going to be the case.

Yes, there is a huge amount of inertia and for a very good reason, that is very organic and was to be expected if you have the right experience.

Most people will not be aware that actual operational software in critical infrastructure changes very slowly, much slower than bitcoin Core (which is very high risk by comparison but it is still 'beta'). 90% of fortune 500 companies run RedHat operating systems on their back-office servers and they have very long term support for old versions for those reasons. Apparently the Banks still have some COBOL code running on old mainframes that still do the actual monetary-base and settlement calculations, so-called "green screen" functions because they are too scared to touch it.

Nuclear power plants and oil-rig safety shutdown systems that include software hardly ever make changes to their code after it has been commissioned and the plant "goes live" with active material. It takes committees of programmers and managers poring over every line to get even the simplest changes into an active system.

The disconnect between what is happening here and what the public have been told to "want to happen" is astounding for anybody with any experience in high-risk industrial software systems. The bitcoin protocol is almost complete now and will hardly ever change from now or else it will risk catastrophic failure. It is just very, very unfortunate that Gavin and Hearn "went there" with the whole hard fork MAD power grab, against the vast majority of the development community's technically better judgement and in an entirely reckless manner for critical infrastructure software management.

You can't grab power you already have. Gavin was lead developer and shepherded Bitcoin into where it is today. Satoshi himself gave him the reins. it's the other core developers who are grabbing power, but I guess that's how you spin propaganda. Claim the opposition is guilty of the very sin you are committing. That 1 MB limit was a temporary kludge included when bitcoin had NO monetary value and was useful only then. Gavin knew that and has been trying to get rid of it for years. This fee market is just rent-seeking and it will keep Bitcoin a financial backwater if it is left in place.

Blockstreamers may know software, but they don't know business and they sure as hell don't know economics, so if they can't fix the scaling problem without changing everything that makes Bitcoin Bitcoin, then they need to get out of the way and make room for people who can.



3187. Post 13343134 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on December 24, 2015, 05:51:27 AM
Yes, there is a huge amount of inertia and for a very good reason, that is very organic and was to be expected if you have the right experience.

-snip-

Nuclear power plants and oil-rig safety shutdown systems that include software hardly ever make changes to their code after it has been commissioned and the plant "goes live" with active material. It takes committees of programmers and managers poring over every line to get even the simplest changes into an active system.

The disconnect between what is happening here and what the public have been told to "want to happen" is astounding for anybody with any experience in high-risk industrial software systems. The bitcoin protocol is almost complete now and will hardly ever change from now or else it will risk catastrophic failure. It is just very, very unfortunate that Gavin and Hearn "went there" with the whole hard fork MAD power grab, against the vast majority of the development community's technically better judgement and in an entirely reckless manner for critical infrastructure software management.

How does segwit fit with this critical infrastructure stasis analogy? Where garzik's plan does not. Huh

I agree that most of the network didn't want to jump into the arms of a benevolently dictatorial Hearn, but that does not preclude future possibility of hard forking from the previously dominant implementation's centrally planned capacity policy.



That's a damn good question, but don't hold your breath waiting for an answer from the cripplecoiners. They're only conservative when it comes to the obsolete blocksize limit. Lightning networks, sidechains, segwit, well that's just innovation!



3188. Post 13343156 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 24, 2015, 05:58:49 AM

You can't grab power you already have. Gavin was lead developer and shepherded Bitcoin into where it is today. Satoshi himself gave him the reins. it's the other core developers who are grabbing power, but I guess that's how you spin propaganda. Claim the opposition is guilty of the very sin you are committing. That 1 MB limit was a temporary kludge included when bitcoin had NO monetary value and was useful only then. Gavin knew that and has been trying to get rid of it for years. This fee market is just rent-seeking and it will keep Bitcoin a financial backwater if it is left in place.

Gavin had already long stood down as lead maintainer when he pushed his hard fork to the XT repo. Wladimir vander Laan has been chief maintainer since Sept. 2014. Trying to rewrite history is plain deception or just lying. Gavin made some major mistakes (notably BIP 16/17 and BIP 70) in his time but was an adequate caretaker for the tumultuous time Bitcoin went through while he was contributing.

The fee market will develop because the node operators want it to. They will raise the limit when the fees they pay for THEIR OWN transactions naturally incentivises them to want to ... that is the in-built incentive mechanism to stop fees going to infinity as the doom-mongers and catastrophic-cliff screamers will try to scare you with.

This system has been designed very well, the built-in incentive structures will only become apparent as it fully ramps up and comes on-line. We are still in the commissioning phase, just relax and watch if you don't feel like you can understand everything that is happening.

Node operators will chose the scaling solution most likely to gain a critical mass, but they may not do it until a market crash instills a sense of urgency. If they are as conservative as you suggest, then Garzik's 2 MB kick-the-can is more likely and if that doesn't cause some catastrophic miner centralization or other security problem, then large block size it is, Baby.  Blockstreamers will be discredited.

Your only hope is that pyramid schemers in the East will pump your settlement network permanently, and that's not how pyramid schemes work. Time is more my friend than yours. Let's find out.



3189. Post 13343224 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 24, 2015, 05:58:49 AM

Gavin had already long stood down as lead maintainer when he pushed his hard fork to the XT repo. Wladimir vander Laan has been chief maintainer since Sept. 2014. Trying to rewrite history is plain deception or just lying. Gavin made some major mistakes (notably BIP 16/17 and BIP 70) in his time but was an adequate caretaker for the tumultuous time Bitcoin went through while he was contributing.


So Wladimir took over two months before the longest bear market in bitcoin history? That's just awesomsauce.



3190. Post 13347580 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Volume has really dropped off since the $475 high. This rally may be getting long in the tooth. I lowered the premium on my arbitrage coins and still haven't been getting any bites.



Chinese seem to be the only ones pumping and they may not even be aware of the full block issue.

Repent for the fullblocalypse is nigh.






3191. Post 13347701 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on December 24, 2015, 05:39:39 PM
Thanks for your kind advice, billyjoeallen. I'm sure you could employ your precious energy in far more productive activities other than aimlessly (suspiciously?) repeating yourself.

Here's an idea: How about 1 kilobyte blocks to make the chain Superduper secure? We should petition the central planning committee of Blockstream.



3192. Post 13347838 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on December 24, 2015, 05:57:06 PM
It's fair to say that any mentally sane person who stumbled across this issue isn't glad given the current state of affairs. But surely your behaviour won't help.

It's uncharitable to call the smallblockers insane. Short-sighted and greedy maybe, but not crazy.



3193. Post 13348058 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 24, 2015, 06:18:23 PM
Chinese seem to be the only ones pumping and they may not even be aware of the full block issue.

Most consider it a given that changing the parameters to increase block size is a trivial matter and it will happen sooner or later. Your rationale goes like "if the blocksize isn't increased right now it means it is 1MB forever" and nobody sees it that way, no matter how many times you repeat your doom scenarios. Practically all devs openly say that the blocksize will be increased at some point.

The full blocks is not a real consideration because they can be full even if blocksize goes x2 or x10. The key element is whether miners will start cutting off free txs to compensate for abuse. Then what will you say? That miners cutting off people from transacting for free is not the bitcoin you signed up for? Will you then be calling the core-dev "police" to "impose" some way where the miners are forced to include low-fee / no-fee txs?

There actually are some people who never want the limit raised, but I know that most smallblockers do want want a small increase, just later rather than sooner and smaller rather than bigger. The problem is that waiting until blocks are full enough to have people competing for blockspace, there is little room and time to implement a solution without a service disruption.  

I have no problem with miners deciding how big their blocks are going to be. That's how it's supposed to work, with the contrasting factors being big blocks propagate slower and so run a higher risk of being orphaned, but smaller blocks have less fees.



3194. Post 13348847 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Transactions have increased ~50% in the last month

https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions?timespan=30days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

At this rate, we're ~two months away from the Fullblocalypse.

Happy Ramadan.




3195. Post 13349523 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 24, 2015, 09:08:41 PM
Transactions have increased ~50% in the last month

https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions?timespan=30days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

At this rate, we're ~two months away from the Fullblocalypse.

Happy Ramadan.

Transaction volume in USD ~150-200mn USD

https://blockchain.info/charts/estimated-transaction-volume-usd?showDataPoints=false&timespan=30days&show_header=true&daysAverageString=1&scale=0&address=

Fees paid in USD ~10-18k USD. To move around 200 million.

https://blockchain.info/charts/transaction-fees-usd?timespan=30days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

Yeah, fullblocalypse is round the corner Roll Eyes

Um, no. The block reward subsidizes transaction verification, so you would need to add the market cap of all the coins mined during that time to your $18k to calculate the total cost to move that 200 mil.



3196. Post 13349550 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 24, 2015, 09:59:28 PM
Thanks for your kind advice, billyjoeallen. I'm sure you could employ your precious energy in far more productive activities other than aimlessly (suspiciously?) repeating yourself.

Here's an idea: How about 1 kilobyte blocks to make the chain Superduper secure? We should petition the central planning committee of Blockstream.



Truly over the time that you have been a member of this forum, you have gotten some other members to be sympathetic with whatever self-absorbed and focused cause that you have wished to present; however, the fact of the matter is that you have a considerable inability to recognize nuanced benefits that come from a collaborative process, recognizing variations of views and accepting that not everyone accepts the world from your narrow perspective. 

Even though in various regards, you have asserted that you have the right to participate in this forum, your ongoing cluttering of this thread with your repeated variances of the same message rises to a level of interference with free and fair communication,   and because of your ongoing and unrelenting behavior to clutter thread with irritating dogma and repetition, you and your account should really be either warned, suspended or banned...

your contributions are just the opposite, really...   Best case scenario, you are an attention whore and worst case scenario, you are a paid shill that is purposefully engaging in tactics to detract forum members from engaging in meaningful dialogue.

I'm supposed to get paid? Clearly I'm not doing this right.



3197. Post 13350539 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 24, 2015, 10:21:25 PM
Um, no. The block reward subsidizes transaction verification, so you would need to add the market cap of all the coins mined during that time to your $18k to calculate the total cost to move that 200 mil.

Block reward has two main purposes.

1) Securing the network
2) The necessary distribution of the monetary base during the first years.

BTCs will be issued due to (2) even if zero transactions exist. Same for altcoins sharing BTC code that have much less "traffic" and a lot of empty blocks.

Yes, fees and block reward both are to secure the network. Thanks for making my point for me.

 What sort of person gets upset that somebody's getting too good of a deal, when he's not even a party to the transaction?  If you're running a node, and you think it's too taxing, then stop. If you're not running a node then why do you give a shit? Some people are getting good security inexpensively and others are providing good security inexpensively. The horror. the horror.



3198. Post 13350799 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

BASE TEN MATH

Some day in the near future, Ten or more companies will make 10K transactions or more each. These are your usual suspects: Circle, 21, Coinbase, Bitpay, and some large exchanges.
10 X 10000 =100,000

On that same day, 100 smaller companies are going to make 1K transactions or more each. These are companies like purse.io, bitquick, small gambling sites, smaller exchanges, darknet sales, etc.
100 X 1,000=100,000

Also on that same day, 1000 or more companies will make 100 or more transactions selling goods, remittances, etc.
1,000 X 100=100,000

But we can't forget about the much more common small businesses and individual heavy users who will make ten or more transactions that day.
10,000 X 10=100,000

And then you have people like you and me who may make just one transaction.
100,000 X 1=100,000

So that fills up the entire days worth of blocks and then some, but we still have the light users, the ones who do maybe 1 transaction every 10 days:
1,000,000 x 0.1 =100,000

How many transactions is that? 600K? way too many. So fees creep up. 10% decide that the cost is too high in time or fees and give up.  How many left? 500K. still too many. Fees keep going up.  Transactions take hours to confirm. This makes some traders nervous, and they start pulling coins off exchanges. Traffic increases by the same 10% who gave up. This makes other people nervous. Coinbase and Bitpay users start to users start to fear their business model is unworkable and move their coins to private wallets. This increases traffic even more. It now takes 10 hours to confirm a transaction.

At this point, Ten of the many, many enemies of bitcoin see an opportunity. For $10,000 in fees, they flood the blockchain with yet MORE transactions, increasing the panic which of course makes even more people want to move their coins around. When they see how effective this attack is, they go for the kill and spend $100,000 to back up traffic for 10 days. 

What would happen after that is unpredictable, beyond the singularity. What do you think might happen?



3199. Post 13359438 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

What do you call those tremors that presage the Big Quake? I was never much of a JJGeeologist.



3200. Post 13359470 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: Scream on December 26, 2015, 06:15:19 AM
like last january we will down again to $300 ?  Roll Eyes

i hope i have more $ to buy bitcoin again  Grin

If you sell what you have now, you'll have money.



3201. Post 13367298 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 26, 2015, 06:21:08 AM
What do you call those tremors that presage the Big Quake? I was never much of a JJGeeologist.


You can be a little more direct, if you are trying to get in digs in at me.


Yet, There seems to be no predictive value or "I told you so" value taking place at the moment, because i do not engage in any real specific or absolute attempts to predict the short-term price direction of BTC... furthermore your various posts predicting the ultimate downfall of BTC and its various deficiencies are also not really short-term predictions (and do not seem to be at play with the current downturn in BTC prices.

Anyhow, I stand by my earlier comments relating to your seemingly disingenuous tendencies.

Why am I the issue at all? It shouldn't matter if my arguments are sincere or not. It should only matter if they are valid.  Smallblockers think making blockspace more expensive makes them more valuable, when usually things become expensive because they are already more valuable.

I remember when I used to think that having a large vocabulary was an adequate substitute for good judgment. Most people grow out of that.



3202. Post 13367359 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: niktitan132 on December 27, 2015, 02:19:08 AM
I just bought a few more bitcoin. as it goes down I buy more


You must have bought quite a lot in the last two years then.



3203. Post 13382081 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on December 28, 2015, 05:09:00 PM
January 4th we'll start moving up again. You will all see.

Chinese return to buying spree after new years holidays?

Have you not been reading the news? The Chinese economy is a basket case. They don't have money to buy anything.



3204. Post 13382536 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

3K bidwall on BFX

EDIT: Aaaand it's gone.



3205. Post 13382593 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: toinew on December 28, 2015, 07:22:33 PM
3K bidwall on BFX

EDIT: Aaaand it's gone.

lasted less than 1 minute, and someone sold 800 bitcoin to that wall. What do you think about this kind of trick ?


Looks like it backfired. Someone trying to push the price up or hold it up in a futile effort to keep the 1 HR moving average green.

Nobody's buying my coins retail. I have to keep lowering my premium and they still don't move. 



3206. Post 13384588 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 28, 2015, 08:48:44 PM
3K bidwall on BFX

EDIT: Aaaand it's gone.

lasted less than 1 minute, and someone sold 800 bitcoin to that wall. What do you think about this kind of trick ?


Looks like it backfired. Someone trying to push the price up or hold it up in a futile effort to keep the 1 HR moving average green.

Nobody's buying my coins retail. I have to keep lowering my premium and they still don't move. 


You are a fucking liar in this post.  You had plenty opportunity to sell your coins in the upper $420s in the past 12 hours or so, if you really wanted to sell your coins, and if you have any to sell.

The only reason you wouldn't be able to sell you coins is that you would have been attempting to sell them at a 1% or more above retail, and farting around with your price, as to never get them to sell.

So, yes, sincerity is important, when you are spinning such bullshit... regarding supposedly what you have been attempting to accomplish, but supposedly unable to accomplish.

Ok, let me explain to you how this works: I have a couple of coins that I sell retail. When I do, I take some of the cash I have sitting on the exchange and I rebuy the same amount I sell, thereby reducing the amount of fiat at BFX that is at risk of vanishing if the exchange goes gox while keeping my exposure to price changes neutral except for the coins I am using to ferry out my cash. 

I don't care if the price goes up or down. If it goes down far enough, I can buy with the cash I have on the exchange. If it goes up a little, I sell one or two coins at a time and rebuy with the same pile of cash. If it keeps going up and this becomes the next great bull market, I'll keep selling until my trading cash is exhausted and then I'll start selling my cold storage coins. I'll sell those until I run out and then you'll probably not hear from me again.

However if, as I suspect, this whole rally above the $300 range is a bulltrap that will end in fullblocalypse, then there will be some real bargains in the future and hodlers are going to miss an opportunity. You had better hope that doesn't happen because then this thread will get rather more sympathetic to my viewpoint.



3207. Post 13384856 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 29, 2015, 12:17:05 AM
3K bidwall on BFX

EDIT: Aaaand it's gone.

lasted less than 1 minute, and someone sold 800 bitcoin to that wall. What do you think about this kind of trick ?


Looks like it backfired. Someone trying to push the price up or hold it up in a futile effort to keep the 1 HR moving average green.

Nobody's buying my coins retail. I have to keep lowering my premium and they still don't move. 


You are a fucking liar in this post.  You had plenty opportunity to sell your coins in the upper $420s in the past 12 hours or so, if you really wanted to sell your coins, and if you have any to sell.

The only reason you wouldn't be able to sell you coins is that you would have been attempting to sell them at a 1% or more above retail, and farting around with your price, as to never get them to sell.

So, yes, sincerity is important, when you are spinning such bullshit... regarding supposedly what you have been attempting to accomplish, but supposedly unable to accomplish.

Ok, let me explain to you how this works: I have a couple of coins that I sell retail. When I do, I take some of the cash I have sitting on the exchange and I rebuy the same amount I sell, thereby reducing the amount of fiat at BFX that is at risk of vanishing if the exchange goes gox while keeping my exposure to price changes neutral except for the coins I am using to ferry out my cash. 

I don't care if the price goes up or down. If it goes down far enough, I can buy with the cash I have on the exchange. If it goes up a little, I sell one or two coins at a time and rebuy with the same pile of cash. If it keeps going up and this becomes the next great bull market, I'll keep selling until my trading cash is exhausted and then I'll start selling my cold storage coins. I'll sell those until I run out and then you'll probably not hear from me again.

However if, as I suspect, this whole rally above the $300 range is a bulltrap that will end in fullblocalypse, then there will be some real bargains in the future and hodlers are going to miss an opportunity. You had better hope that doesn't happen because then this thread will get rather more sympathetic to my viewpoint.



I don't mind if members of the thread get sympathetic to your viewpoint as long as you are not just making things up.   

I certainly don't know how prices or the scaling blockchain is going to work out in terms of market dynamics, but it does seem likely that you will not be going away soon.  I mean, it sounds like the best case scenario for you going away would be if the price gradually went up and you cashed out, but historically, it seems that nothing is really gradual in bitcoin, and I really have my doubts that you would be good for your word and really leave bitcoin, in that best case scenario.   

in other words, your an addict, admit it...  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I never denied it, but I am reducing my exposure and will continue to do so until the scaling issue is resolved or until I run out of coins, whichever comes first. I used to think that all I had to do was wait for the halving, but it is fairly clear that we'll get full blocks before then, and so the future is unknown. Anyone not in a position to wait until we have a better idea how this plays out is likely to make some bad trades.



3208. Post 13384906 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on December 29, 2015, 12:20:03 AM
if that confederate flag waving hick, BJA, wants to cash out and make his life more comfortable for himself and his confederate flag waving children, I think he should be allowed to do so in his own time.


I suppose if I had to pick a side in the War between the States, I would chose the South, but as an anarcho-capitalist, I really wouldn't have my heart in it.  Generally speaking, when two groups of statists fight each other, the winning move is to get out of the way.



3209. Post 13385173 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on December 29, 2015, 01:13:15 AM
^^Translation: "Fine, sell. I don't care. You sell now, I'll sell later. I don't care."


Bahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!




a $4 bump is hardly a reason for train gifs. What does a $10 bump get, rockets? 



3210. Post 13385413 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

What am I lying about, again? I was trying to sell a couple coins, they finally sold at about $430 (retail). I bought them back at a slight discount, but other than that my entire trading account is in cash. Honest injun.



3211. Post 13385489 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 29, 2015, 02:25:01 AM
What am I lying about, again? I was trying to sell a couple coins, they finally sold at about $430 (retail). I bought them back at a slight discount, but other than that my entire trading account is in cash. Honest injun.

hahahahahaha


Keep up man, that lying is so yesterday's news.

sounds like you sold some BTC, and then bought them back, so in the end, you didn't really sell anything and you made a bit of a trading profit in the process.

I never claimed to be "really selling anything". What I am doing (again) is taking money off the exchange. The fact that I have to reduce the premium I get for selling retail indicates anecdotally that western demand is depressed.

I think if I was going to lie to make a bearish argument, I would invent something more persuasive, but apparently you consider my point so devastating to the bull camp that it must be fabricated. or something. I don't really understand your hostility.



3212. Post 13385606 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 29, 2015, 02:38:11 AM
What am I lying about, again? I was trying to sell a couple coins, they finally sold at about $430 (retail). I bought them back at a slight discount, but other than that my entire trading account is in cash. Honest injun.

Shhhh!!! Don't do that!!!


Can't you hear him typing?




I just did a quick back of the envelope calculation, if you (Fatman) convince BJA to sell me 50 BTC at $1.20 each, then my BTC portfolio will be approximately at a breaking-even point.   


 a great idea, no?


That is if BJA even has 50 BTC.... hahahahahaha

Don't be so hard on yourself. I bought between $6 and $12 then the market went up to $32 and then down to $3 and stayed there for a year and a half. Just hold. If we ever get this scaling thing worked out, you'll do fine. 



3213. Post 13385683 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 29, 2015, 02:52:20 AM



Regarding your selling btc at retail (and above retail), is that on local bitcoins or directly meeting with people or some other advertisement mechanism?

Bitquick. I used to get a 7% premium, but I had to drop it to 4%.

It's risky because everyone I sell to gets my bank account number, but people on localbitcoins get mugged, so it's a tradeoff.

Now, in my part of the swamp, if you call somebody a liar, they might just drop you on the spot. The cops wouldn't even do anything if they did because there's a legal concept called "fighting words." But I wouldn't do that because I'm a libertarian and I take the whole "non-aggression" thing seriously. Still, it would show character if you were to step up like a man and apologize. It won't hurt my feeling if you don't, but it's an opportunity for you to show some class.



3214. Post 13386257 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 29, 2015, 03:57:14 AM

Now, in my part of the swamp, if you call somebody a liar, they might just drop you on the spot. The cops wouldn't even do anything if they did because there's a legal concept called "fighting words." But I wouldn't do that because I'm a libertarian and I take the whole "non-aggression" thing seriously. Still, it would show character if you were to step up like a man and apologize. It won't hurt my feeling if you don't, but it's an opportunity for you to show some class.


I'm not going to take back my words, because I think that they were appropriate based on the context in which you framed your assertions, including leaving out details concerning how you defined retail.. and also given your admitted tendencies to exaggerate.

I have no intention to purposefully denigrate anyone, but sometimes you do have a tendency to push buttons, so such button pushing may sometimes cause others to become a bit "hostile," as you described it.

It is NOT my fault, Your Honor. He was provoking me! Repetition and hyperbole are only used by lying liars and any attempt to be persuasive is illegitimate unless it consists entirely of unnecessarily polysyllabic language.  



3215. Post 13390320 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

why is everybody ignoring the $10 pump? almost no resistance.



3216. Post 13392761 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: aminorex on December 29, 2015, 07:45:02 PM
It's a technical problem.  There are technical solutions.  When I want to make a BTC purchase, I spend XMR using xmr.to or shapeshift.io.  Consequently my privacy is assured.
What's the technical solution for buying a car, a house, a commercial property?
In each of those cases, the purchase is a matter of public record, and hence privacy concerns are moot.

But yes, there is a scale problem.  When the nickel and dime volume is large enough, then the liquidity will suffice for the dollar traffic to insinuate itself, &c.  Given the trend in privacy awareness in marketplaces which have historically been early adopters of crypto, I expect the scale problem to work itself out over time.  "Price fixes everything."  

More like "price fixing screws up everything."  The miners just want a good Return on Investment, as they should. The're not going to rock the boat, either for the blockstream patch, BIP101, or any other scaling solution until it hurts their bottom line enough to do so.  That means the price has to go down far enough for them to have the incentive to adopt a patch and if price doesn't...fullblocalypse. Miners will take us right to the brink because they want the fees and don't want risk breaking Bitcoin until it's clear that it's already broken.

As fees creep up and most legit users stop using the network, the money launderers tax cheats and drug dealers will dominate and then the governments will push to seal up the on and offramps under some anti-terrorism bullshit.

Blockstream can stop BIP101. Bigblockers can stop Blockstream. Nobody has a consensus and nobody is going to get one. Traders will be able to jam the network for hours to manipulate the price. Meanwhile BankAmericoin, Applecoin, FBcoin and others are going to roll out their products and the first mover advantage will be squandered.



3217. Post 13393202 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Jeff Garzik on the Stalling Bitcoin conferences:

https://medium.com/@jgarzik/bitcoin-is-being-hot-wired-for-settlement-a5beb1df223a#.82qumsxby

Quote
One of the explicit goals of the Scaling Bitcoin workshops was to funnel the chaotic core block size debate into an orderly decision making process. That did not occur. In hindsight, Scaling Bitcoin stalled a block size decision while transaction fee price and block space pressure continue to increase.

This is far from fucking over.



3218. Post 13393262 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 29, 2015, 09:55:01 PM
Jeff Garzik on the Stalling Bitcoin conferences:

https://medium.com/@jgarzik/bitcoin-is-being-hot-wired-for-settlement-a5beb1df223a#.82qumsxby

Quote
One of the explicit goals of the Scaling Bitcoin workshops was to funnel the chaotic core block size debate into an orderly decision making process. That did not occur. In hindsight, Scaling Bitcoin stalled a block size decision while transaction fee price and block space pressure continue to increase.

This is far from fucking over.


That's right, and it seems that you are planning to continue to provide us with a blow by blow status update regarding the impending fulblocalypse on a several times a day basis.   

That's gonna help to light a little fire under their britches...  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

As I've said repeatedly, the only thing likely to light a fire under their britches is a market crash, which makes a market crash almost inevitable.

Quote
to remove long term moral hazard, core block size limit should be made dynamic, put in the realm of software, outside of human hands.



3219. Post 13393489 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 29, 2015, 10:08:42 PM

Remember, the market already enjoyed a mini-crash from the upper $200s/lower $300s range, and it did not seem to phase them too much into resolving the matter... thereafter, we experienced a mini-crash upwards to $500, and pretty much a sustaining above $320 in the past couple of months, which seems a decent indicator that the market is not feeling any fire under their britches.

It seems that with so much money being put into mining and securing the bitcoin network, there is quite a bit of space, yet, to work with before we get too close to the doom and gloom scenario that you are forecasting.


By the way.. you don't seem to like the decision making process of humans too much, unless you are the human making the decision about what needs to be done...  Cry Cry Cry

If you understand what politics really is, you would know that it is not based on win-win like the market, but on win-lose. The art of politics is to convince enough people to agree with you so that you can forcibly impose your will on those who don't.  That is why I prefer markets.

The 1 MB cap is an artificial limit that makes winners and losers.  Some crafty people saw that this anti-spam tool could be re-purposed into an economic policy tool that they could use as a weapon. Allowing this weapon to be in the hands of ANYONE, whether friend or foe creates moral hazard, the same sort of moral hazard that has turned national monetary policy into a wealth transfer engine from poor people to rich people. 

What happens to all the wallets with milibits in them when the xaction fees run in centibits? They are effectively worthless.  Wealth stolen from the poor just like with fiat.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.




3220. Post 13393786 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

There is no objective criteria for any increases at all, and this may be by design. In the absence of such criteria, the de facto criteria becomes:

When Core developers get bribed X amount of money, the limit increases or decreases by Y amount.

There's no reason to think that software engineers are any better at central planning than bankers are.

Just tell us when the limit will be raised and by how much so we can fucking plan. If you don't tell us, we don't know if it will ever be raised and preparing for the Fullblocalypse is more being responsible than being paranoid. 




3221. Post 13394483 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Arguing that there is no valid reason to raise the block size limit now doesn't address the issue. The issue is that there is no condition known that will cause Core to raise the limit and no known process by which they would do so. So IF for example, every single block was full for a week and fees go up 100X what they are now, we still don't know how long it would take for the problem to be fixed or even if Core would consider that a problem worth fixing.

We don't even know if there is to be a permanent schedule of increases or a permanent sitting committee to determine such things so we can go through this whole damn thing again in a year or two.

What is the fair price for a transaction fee in the absence of a free market? There is no such thing, only the arbitrary judgement of fallible human controllers.

The philosophical issue boils down to Rule of Law vs. Rule of Man.  Is economic policy in the hands of impartial code or in the hands of corruptible, biased humans? 

Do we really need another monetary system held hostage to central planners? We need a hard-coded solution, not a goddamned committee. The blocksize limit doesn't just create a market for transaction fees. It creates a market for influence over the people controlling the cap.






3222. Post 13395300 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Civil engineer: Hey, Boss. Traffic on the bridge is increasing by 50% per month. Shouldn't we widen it?

Bureaucrat: Ha! That bridge has excess capacity. If traffic gets too high, we'll just increase the tolls. Most of those schmucks don't really need to go anywhere anyway.

Civil engineer: Do we know that for sure? What if there is an evacuation or something?

Bureaucrat: That bridge was intentionally designed with low capacity to prevent invasions! Widening it would be a dangerous departure from historic bridge operations.

Civil Engineer: Aren't bridges supposed to be used to facilitate travel?

Bureaucrat: Yes, but only the right sort of travel. That's for me to decide! If traffic gets too heavy, and tolls get too expensive, the people can use buses. Too many single passenger cars anyway.

Civil engineer: Do you own a bus company?

Bureaucrat: Purely coincidental! I'm just guarding against bridgebuilder centralization.

Civil engineer: I see. No conflict of interest there. What's the name of your company anyway, Busstream?

Bureaucrat: BridgestreamTM, Smartass.






3223. Post 13402931 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 30, 2015, 05:24:35 PM
 

To me, it seems that I am just a bit more comfortable and tollerant with allowing the back and forth process to  play itself out without getting so worked up about it and accusing bad motives of others, rather than painting every scenario as doom and gloom or continuing to assert that the sky is falling, when that surely is not the case.

It's not every scenario. It's just this one particular scenario. There aren't two sides that are attempting to negotiate a solution to a problem. There is one side that is trying to fix a problem and another side that is attempting to make the problem worse so they can sell a proprietary workaround or failing that, to delay fixing the problem as long as possible.

Smallblockers are not arguing in good faith. It makes no sense to change the way Bitcoin works so that we can avoid changing the way bitcoin works. It makes no sense to vilify opinions or procedures critical of centralized power if your chief concern is centralized power.

You don't shout down your opposition if you want a reasoned solution. You don't censor opposing viewpoints if your goal is rational discourse that addresses the concerns of all stakeholders. You sure as hell don't keep changing your rationalizations to support the same conclusion.

If you want a digital gold system, then you can't in good faith say the blockchain can't be used for non-monetary purposes with respect to colored coins, title transfers, timestamps and microtransactions. Gold isn't cash. If you want a digital cash system, then you can't jack up fees so high that small cash purchases become nonviable. If you want a network that can only be effectively used by directly by rich people, then you can't credibly claim to be the conservative force faithful to the original vision and purpose of Bitcoin. You should be honest enough to admit that you want to change Bitcoin, to take it away from those who built it, put in the effort and absorbed the risks and give it not to the people who need it but to people who stand in the middle and make profits from INCREASING rather than decreasing the friction in trade. 




3224. Post 13403571 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 30, 2015, 08:48:07 PM
If you want a digital gold system, then you can't in good faith say the blockchain can't be used for non-monetary purposes with respect to colored coins, title transfers, timestamps and microtransactions.

Piling every proof-of-work quorum system in the world into one dataset doesn't scale.

Bitcoin and BitDNS can be used separately.  Users shouldn't have to download all of both to use one or the other.  BitDNS users may not want to download everything the next several unrelated networks decide to pile in either.

The networks need to have separate fates.  BitDNS users might be completely liberal about adding any large data features since relatively few domain registrars are needed, while Bitcoin users might get increasingly tyrannical about limiting the size of the chain so it's easy for lots of users and small devices.

Apparently billyjoeallen is a true visionary, unlike cripplecoiner Satoshi who put there the 1MB limit and only wanted Bitcoin's fate to be "restricted" into a much lesser role instead of wanting to include every possible dataset that can be "blockchained", into BTC's blockchain.

As an inventor, Satoshi would likely get enormous credit for creating something that could be used for 100 or 1000 stuff simultaneously instead of 1, 5 or 10. Yet he was quite open and honest about whether that would actually scale.

Satoshi showed the way: The invention of the blockchain could be used with parallel blockchains for different data sets. It was not necessary to put every single data set into the same blockchain.

But billyjoeallen knows better...

This is what I mean when I say arguing in bad faith. The context of the Satoshi quote makes it clear he was discussing BitDNS, which isn't at all what we are discussing here.  Even still he qualifies why bitcoin users may want to limit the size of the blockchain: so it's easy for lots of users and small devices.

The issue was to keep bitcoin inclusive, not to make it exclusive.  Fortunately with deterministic wallets we can use small devices and the size of the blockchain isn't a limiting factor.  But we can't have lots of users if we're limited to ~ half a million transactions per day.  

And regardless of what SM thought about "Piling every proof-of-work quorum system in the world into one dataset", the 1 MB limit was not designed or used to prevent it. It was specifically included to prevent DDS attacks and if it it used now for any other purpose, such as to create a transaction fee market, then that is a change, a departure that actually makes DDS attacks MORE likely, not less.




3225. Post 13403875 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 30, 2015, 10:05:55 PM
This is what I mean when I say arguing in bad faith. The context of the Satoshi quote makes it clear he was discussing BitDNS, which isn't at all what we are discussing here.

The application name is irrelevant. Someone would argue "why should Bitcoin make it impossible for my app to store the x, y, z data sets into the blockchain? I want bigger blocks and cheaper blocks, otherwise Bitcoin is preventing innovation".

Bitcoin, as it is, can't even scale to serve its primary purpose of e-cash in order to rival paypal, visa, etc. And then you have people who want to store all sort of stuff in the same blockchain - when these things could be stored in other blockchains. And you also have spammers who like to fill the blocks for the lulz, paying peanuts.

Obvious priority is obvious. Or isn't it?

It can't scale because people like you won't let it scale!  My node cost me $118 plus maybe a few bucks per month in bandwidth, But I could easily double that every year as long as the price more than doubles, but it's been over TWO YEARS since the last ATH and we're still well under 50% of that level now and I believe that is primarily because of smallblocker obstinance.




3226. Post 13404728 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 31, 2015, 12:25:56 AM
Anyhow, probably time to put on a full-node again,

I restarted 24/7 on mine about a month ago, due to the controversy. Currently running Core, but not as support for core dev position. I am _very_ motivated to find an alternative. If only the 'anything but 1MB4EVA stasis' crowd had a single standard to rally around...

Do you run yours from your computer at home, or from a vps?

I have been meaning to start running one, but I can't run mine from home, and it costs quite a lot for a decent vps that's reliable and has sufficient bandwidth. What's the lowest spec vps that can run a full node, and how much data would it probably use in a month?

Home. My entire bitcoin folder tree amounts to less than 64 GiB - or less than USD $10 of disk space. Bandwidth is such that I don't even notice any degradation to other apps. I admit that my ISP is better than many. I've never thought to measure it with any finer resolution than 'computing demands are irrelevant'.

BJA might be able to provide more info on VPS use. I think he said $118/yr, and a 'couple bucks/month for bandwidth'. But I don't mean to put words into his mouth.

I post here under my real name. Why the hell would I use a VPS?



3227. Post 13405202 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 31, 2015, 01:21:40 AM
Market prices tend to rise with increased demand. That is a market function. And when you are still lower than your closest competitor, people will still prefer your service over theirs. If a bank wire costs 10$ and takes days and a btc transfer costs 1$ and takes minutes, why would I use SWIFT instead of BTC?

True, Bitcoin today enjoys a 91% market share of crypto. However, in the overall scope of a USD $7B asset class adrift in a many-$T sea, that market share is not unassailable. Indeed, should the masses finally decide to adopt crypto, I would expect them to adopt one that they can actually _use_, rather than one that prevents them from participating due to an arbitrary limitation. Any of dozens of shitcoins are waiting in the wings to meet this market need, jealously awaiting a chance to procure adoption by delivering real value in comparison to Bitcoin.

What will happen, at most, is that shitcoins will be used for low-value txs and btc will be used for high value txs. You want to gamble for a few cents => you use a shitcoin. You want to buy a chewing gum => you use a shitcoin. You want to transfer 500$ or $5 mn, you use BTC.

At MOST, some people or group could sink billions into an altcoin, complete with incentives for miners to switch, a well-funded marketing effort, a competent development group that they can control (or at least trust), legal defense fund, lobbying team, focus groups, etc. 

What's seven billion dollars to Wall Street or Silicone Valley? What's the payoff if they succeed?  I'm surprised they haven't done this already.



3228. Post 13405375 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on December 31, 2015, 02:00:20 AM



Explanation


I take it that means the last block was 860KB.  Getting  closer. 



3229. Post 13406220 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 31, 2015, 04:20:35 AM
Why?

If everyone uses litecoin why would Bitcoin be better for larger transactions?

If *everyone* uses litecoin, it won't be.

The chances of that happening is near zero for a long list of reasons.

What will happen, at most, is that shitcoins will be used for low-value txs and btc will be used for high value txs. You want to gamble for a few cents => you use a shitcoin. You want to buy a chewing gum => you use a shitcoin. You want to transfer 500$ or $5 mn, you use BTC.

You are advancing a hypothesis as a known. I think your hypothesis is faulty.

I believe that, should any alt be adopted for small value transactions, the line between 'small value' and 'large value' will quickly trend upwards in absolute value, eventually subsuming all of the actual value within the so-called 'high value' transaction space. If indeed this vision is correct, the Bitcoin would be left eventually as valueless.

The fee market dictates the transaction type. If you have, say, 1$ fee, you can't perform 1-2-3$ txs. You can however perform 50-100-1000-1mn USD txs.

When you have a network that does like 500.000 txs of an average 1.000-10.000$ (acting like the "SWIFT" of crypto), you are at 0.5 to 5bn USD per day.

And if you have a network that does 10 times the number of transactions, say 5mn txs, but for "small" values, like an average of 1 to 10$ per tx, it will only be at 5 to 50mn USD tx volume.

One would say "but why wouldn't people keep their money on the second coin with the many txs etc". The answer is: because it is a disposable coin / a joke coin, that will be unable to preserve functionality in the long run.

It is impossible for a low-fee coin to survive blockchain abuse, which, in the long run, will render that coin unusable. If there is no new mechanism that allows for scaling, all the reasons that prevent bitcoin from going into huge blocks are also there. And they are exploitable. Imagine you have an altcoin that tomorrow gets all the btc load for near zero fees. What's stopping script kiddies from inserting tonz of transactions for the lulz to see the network get clogged? And then people will say "oh fuck that, I came to this altcoin to escape higher fees and now I'm queued for ages and I have to pay fees again, and then, as the attackers are willing to pay even very small fees, I must now pay even higher fees, etc, etc... it's all fucked up". LTC, DOGE are affected in the same way. We'll see how DASH goes because it actually will try to do something different, through the masternode network, but anyway. If you can get many txs for free you can also spam for free and abuse the system (and then the devs will have to "react" by increasing fees to stop the abuse, etc etc). Monero got attacked that way last year I think, and they had to raise fees to prevent the blockchain from getting bloated to DOA levels.

At MOST, some people or group could sink billions into an altcoin, complete with incentives for miners to switch, a well-funded marketing effort, a competent development group that they can control (or at least trust), legal defense fund, lobbying team, focus groups, etc. 

What's seven billion dollars to Wall Street or Silicone Valley? What's the payoff if they succeed?  I'm surprised they haven't done this already.

If that altcoin has very low or near zero fees, it will be exploitable - no matter who creates it. Btw, the scenario of a Wall-Street-coin or Silicon-Valley-coin, is not a real threat due to being centralized. As I told you yesterday, these will be competing in the centralized space with visa and paypal, not with BTC.

If they are an alternative player with a decentralized currency and they arrive on the scene claiming that they can supply millions of txs for free, I can make a script to add gigabytes per day for the lolz into its blockchain. At some point, when people will not be happy with this, and the network will be threatened for its long-term sustainability, the devs will have to "react" and raise fees in order to prevent me from spamming it.

Big money will not necessarily solve the scaling issue. Code will (scaling improvements, new compression algorithms, etc). Or technology will (more storage, faster processing, greater bandwidth etc). Things that apply today, in terms of technological restrictions, might not apply in 3-5-10-15 years. But even if you have a far more capable network in terms of tx capacity, it will always be subject to abuse in a zero to low fee scenario. And thus it will need to be protected. This applies to both BTC and altcoins.

You have a serious denial issues if you think someone can't copy an open source project, tweak it to remove some bugs, rebrand it to get rid of the baggage and bullshit and give the dominant player some serious competition, especially with enough funding. It doesn't matter if it's grass roots or astroturf.  Fake it 'till you make it.   Billionaires who missed out on being early adopters can be early adopters of BTC2.0 It can even be decentralized and distributed. Haterz be worldwide, Bro.



3230. Post 13406344 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on December 31, 2015, 04:41:55 AM
Going from 2.7 tps to 5.4 tps isn't trying to make a VISA competitor where the world's cups of coffee will be forever on the blockchain. It's simply growing in line with (actually more conservatively than) hardware/bandwidth improvement. With current number of tx, and no block subsidy... this thing is as good as dead.

That's why the block reward exists, to provide cheapish transactions while we grow the base number of transactions that will eventually cover the cost of mining security. 

That's the baffling/infuriating part with small blockers, they assume that if we hard fork to 2MB once, 256MB is right around the corner... it's not. It's also completely different from changing the reward schedule, which is often raised in the next sentence.

If Bitcoin is artificially crippled at 1MB4EVA, or even 1.75MB with segwit through 2018, competitors will be picking away at that first mover advantage like a vulture on a corpse. This is not gold, it's not on the periodic table, it's open source software. It's value is derived from utility, and expected utility. Kill the utility, kill the coin... or at least relegate it to rpietila's new castle game.


+1

You can have a lot of little fees or a few big fees, but if you opt for a few big fees, you can expect competition who will choose the opposite business model.



3231. Post 13456194 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Elwar on January 05, 2016, 03:52:06 PM
ACCUMULATE metals while they are still artificially depressed! the lower they go the more should buy................ bitcoin is a scam.

Interesting...how much of a discount can I get on my Amazon purchases using metals?

How do I send them my metals from Europe for payment?

25,000 isn't a lot of people, but if they all wanted to spend or send bitcoin in the same hour, they couldn't do it, no matter how much in fees they paid.

At least PMs scale.



3232. Post 13456915 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: SweetieBelle! on January 05, 2016, 04:26:17 PM
ACCUMULATE metals while they are still artificially depressed! the lower they go the more should buy................ bitcoin is a scam.

Interesting...how much of a discount can I get on my Amazon purchases using metals?

How do I send them my metals from Europe for payment?

25,000 isn't a lot of people, but if they all wanted to spend or send bitcoin in the same hour, they couldn't do it, no matter how much in fees they paid.

At least PMs scale.

The ones who paid the highest fees would get through. The ones who didn't pay enough wouldn't. What is it about free market that's so difficult to grasp?

I mean, you're at a car auction, there's a really nice Renault Le Car on the block, everyone wants it, there's (obviously) not enough Le Car for everyone, but the highest bidder wins & drives it away.
Get it?
And also sidechains.

It's not difficult to grasp at all, but if you commoditize bitcoin AND blockspace, You're not going to get more revenue, just the same revenue from two different methods. It would be like auctioning off the Le Car and trying to charge a separate additional fee to the winning bidder to remove the car from the auction house.  You can charge the fee and collect it, but the winning bid will be lower by roughly the exact same amount.



3233. Post 13486834 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: aztecminer on January 08, 2016, 03:26:52 PM
^OK.

Hey, how come nobody's talkin' 'bout this?

https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-core/2016-01-07-statement

It's like you all just up and forgot how to appreciate Blockstream!


hahahahaha...


The reason is because, for some strange reason, the one instrument marching band, BJA, has disappeared from this thread and has NOT been trolling in recent days.

He (BJA) is probably out trying to figure out his story in order to make a come back and to tell us about his having had made "mucho bucks" in the latest BTC price movement because of our small blocker stupidities.


don't worry.. i got the trash talking covered while he is away .

I made a few bucks lending out my fiat to bulls. The interest rate has shot up.  Look, I don't know for sure if we're going to get a network congestion crash, but it's a very real risk.  I have a higher percentage of my net worth in BTC than almost anybody else here. I HOPE I'm wrong, but it's just plain irresponsible not to factor in the danger when we are running so close to maximum capacity and getting closer every day.

The Blockstream core devs have an incentive to overstate the problems with large blocks. They have an incentive to restrict network capacity and keep it congested. That doesn't automatically mean that they are acting on those incentives, but if they are, it would explain a lot of their actions and rhetoric.

What I am more worried about is the possibility that there is an ongoing rough consensus attack that will keep ANY resolution from being implemented until Bitcoin loses first mover advantage. But I guess it doesn't ultimately matter if the impasse is intentional or not. What matters is whether or not Bitcoin is really anti-fragile, and that is unknown at this point.



3234. Post 13487304 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: philip2000uk on January 08, 2016, 04:34:51 PM
^OK.

Hey, how come nobody's talkin' 'bout this?

https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-core/2016-01-07-statement

It's like you all just up and forgot how to appreciate Blockstream!


hahahahaha...


The reason is because, for some strange reason, the one instrument marching band, BJA, has disappeared from this thread and has NOT been trolling in recent days.

He (BJA) is probably out trying to figure out his story in order to make a come back and to tell us about his having had made "mucho bucks" in the latest BTC price movement because of our small blocker stupidities.


don't worry.. i got the trash talking covered while he is away .

I made a few bucks lending out my fiat to bulls. The interest rate has shot up.  Look, I don't know for sure if we're going to get a network congestion crash, but it's a very real risk.  I have a higher percentage of my net worth in BTC than almost anybody else here. I HOPE I'm wrong, but it's just plain irresponsible not to factor in the danger when we are running so close to maximum capacity and getting closer every day.

The Blockstream core devs have an incentive to overstate the problems with large blocks. They have an incentive to restrict network capacity and keep it congested. That doesn't automatically mean that they are acting on those incentives, but if they are, it would explain a lot of their actions and rhetoric.

What I am more worried about is the possibility that there is an ongoing rough consensus attack that will keep ANY resolution from being implemented until Bitcoin loses first mover advantage. But I guess it doesn't ultimately matter if the impasse is intentional or not. What matters is whether or not Bitcoin is really anti-fragile, and that is unknown at this point.
I don't know what you just said lol...anyway btc to the moon Smiley

I'm saying the transaction relay network may crash when it gets so close to full capacity that transactions fail, get repeatedly resubmitted which makes the congestion and failure rate worse, and this condition will remain until there is a market crash and enough people stop using Bitcoin to clear the backlog. If this happens in conjunction with the high profile launch of a competing cryptocurrency, it may be enough to overcome Bitcoin's network effects and turn us into the MySpace of crypto. 



3235. Post 13487526 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 08, 2016, 04:43:44 PM

Nice to see you haven't gone full aztec on us. If there is an intentional "rough consensus attack" going on, who do you think is conducting it?

Cui Bono. Who benefits? The State(s). The Banks. Silicone Valley. Wallstreet. The suspect list is long. It could just be manipulators who want to drive the price down so that they can buy on the cheap before a scaling solution is implemented.



3236. Post 13487677 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 08, 2016, 04:43:44 PM
^OK.

Hey, how come nobody's talkin' 'bout this?

https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-core/2016-01-07-statement

It's like you all just up and forgot how to appreciate Blockstream!


hahahahaha...


The reason is because, for some strange reason, the one instrument marching band, BJA, has disappeared from this thread and has NOT been trolling in recent days.

He (BJA) is probably out trying to figure out his story in order to make a come back and to tell us about his having had made "mucho bucks" in the latest BTC price movement because of our small blocker stupidities.


don't worry.. i got the trash talking covered while he is away .

I made a few bucks lending out my fiat to bulls. The interest rate has shot up.  Look, I don't know for sure if we're going to get a network congestion crash, but it's a very real risk.  I have a higher percentage of my net worth in BTC than almost anybody else here. I HOPE I'm wrong, but it's just plain irresponsible not to factor in the danger when we are running so close to maximum capacity and getting closer every day.

The Blockstream core devs have an incentive to overstate the problems with large blocks. They have an incentive to restrict network capacity and keep it congested. That doesn't automatically mean that they are acting on those incentives, but if they are, it would explain a lot of their actions and rhetoric.

What I am more worried about is the possibility that there is an ongoing rough consensus attack that will keep ANY resolution from being implemented until Bitcoin loses first mover advantage. But I guess it doesn't ultimately matter if the impasse is intentional or not. What matters is whether or not Bitcoin is really anti-fragile, and that is unknown at this point.

Nice to see you haven't gone full aztec on us. If there is an intentional "rough consensus attack" going on, who do you think is conducting it?

Cui Bono? Who benefits? The State(s), Banks, Zuckerberg, the list  of suspects is long.

The problem is not just Core's decision-making process. It's Bitcoin's reliance on Core. It's laughable that they cry about centralization when they themselves are Bitcoin's greatest central point of failure.



3237. Post 13488442 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 08, 2016, 07:00:50 PM


Remember when $32 was the ATH?  Cool


Yeah, that was back when the average blocksize was less than 10% of capacity.



3238. Post 13493496 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Andre# on January 09, 2016, 08:20:05 AM

It least it's proven now that than at under normal conditions, the transaction capacity of 1 MB blocks is indeed 2.5 tx/s.

BTW, thanks for improving the font. Much better like this.

That translates to less than a quarter million transactions/day.  We're running around 200,000 xactions/day and growing at a rate of ~40%/month which means we have weeks, not months before the fullblocalypse starts, although it may take months to play out.



3239. Post 13493833 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwcl17Q0bpk

pretty good description of a Rough Consensus Attack. 



3240. Post 13534451 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Cor devs really screwed the pooch letting this fork get so out of hand before backpedaling.  Hopefully they will lose enough credibility with miners so we can just go to 2 MB when the blocks fill up.

Consensus is forming around 2MB.




3241. Post 13544516 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

The only trendline investors look at (as opposed to traders) is the five year exponential trendline, which has leveled off. 

1.There is no possibility of a new ATH without an increase in max block size.

2. There is no possibility of an increase in max blocksize with bigblockers split between Classic (BIP102), XT (BIP101), and Bitcoin Unlimited.

3. There is enough Fear Uncertainty and Doubt to prevent ANY scaling solution, including SegWit, before the Network hit the Transaction capacity limit.

THEREFOR: We will hit the limit and have a network congestion failure. The price will crash. It is almost inevitable now.  The only question is when. My best guess is two months.

THEREFOR we are fucked. 



3242. Post 13545137 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on January 14, 2016, 02:18:17 AM
-snip-
THEREFOR: We will hit the limit and have a network congestion failure. The price will crash. It is almost inevitable now.  The only question is when. My best guess is two months.

THEREFOR we are fucked. 

Hitting the cap and negating use cases for the network isn't a fireworks explosion, we've been over this. It's a slow bleed away of utility. Some "store of value because reasons™ people", some illicit commerce, some off chain speculation, will all still be around to a degree...

It may take years to fully squander the first mover advantage to other alternatives. Blockstream may hope that alternative is them, and they need Bitcoin to still function as a settlement layer...

See, it's not as bad as it could be.

If you still have any concerns, please consult the roadmap.

Moderators are standing by to assist you.


The maximum cost of an altcoin to bootstrap a 7 Billion dollar market cap is 7 Billion dollars. That's peanuts to Wall Street and Silicone Valley and it likely won't take nearly that much.  If First Mover advantage is lost, whether it takes years or months, it will be gone forever.  Yeah, Bitcoin will still be around. Hell, MySpace is still around, but The escape route from Bankster tyranny will have been blocked.



3243. Post 13545149 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: aminorex on January 14, 2016, 02:58:36 AM
If BTC appreciation were actually due to Chinese currency controls, we ought to be taking off right now, as you just can't buy physical USD in China this week.

And yet we're not taking off.  Thank your Core Development friends for that.



3244. Post 13552536 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: BitUsher on January 14, 2016, 03:32:17 AM
If First Mover advantage is lost, whether it takes years or months, it will be gone forever.  Yeah, Bitcoin will still be around. Hell, MySpace is still around, but The escape route from Bankster tyranny will have been blocked.

Goldman sachs and govcoin can never replicate some of bitcoins best attributes:soverign, immutable, no KYC. and extremely unlikely to replicate other features that make bitcoin so great : limited , disinflationary.

Once you know this , you will have no fear of these private blockchains.

Who says it has to even be private? All they have to do is clone bitcoin and premine the shit out of it, market it as the drug and terrorism-free version (loss of anonymity is a feature, not a bug), and prop up the price for a few months.  If they hire K Street lobbyists to encourage USG to treat their coin a little more charitably and our coin with a little more hostility, it's off to the races.

We'll still be squabbling over SegWit and 4MB when their nodes are the size of Google data centers processing millions of transactions an hour. They'll be like a hot IPO and we'll be de-listed and relegated to the penny stock pink sheets. And we'll deserve it.




3245. Post 13554995 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: tomothy on January 14, 2016, 09:42:51 PM
I'm not sure if you guys have read this yet but it's crazy...

Mike Hearn's exit mic drop

I find it tough to dispute his arguments. It's getting close to fork or die time...

https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.m7ipd85nk

I find his arguments persuasive. Gavin made a huge mistake giving commit access to the three smallblockers in core, with no procedure or process for selecting or removing them. This, combined with the perverse incentives of the miners behind the Great Firewall of China to keep Bitcoin small is catastrophic.

What I don't understand is the position of the Bitfury mining giant, the largest pool outside of China. What's their reason for opposing larger blocks? I read their explanation, but it doesn't make sense to me and I suspect there is another reason and they are not forthcoming bout it.

What is terrifying to me as an early adopter with far too large a percentage of my net worth in Bitcoin is that the political problems are so great and resolution so difficult that to any informed party, it is becoming clear that a reboot on an entirely new blockchain is more politically feasible and economically viable than fixing Bitcoin.

The inclusion in core of fee-adjusting code that effectively allows chargebacks prior to transaction confirmation is particularly troubling, as it destroys (perhaps intentionally) the business models of retailers and payment processors alike. 

My life savings is under the control of people I don't like and don't trust, but what bothers me more is the squandered opportunity to really advance the cause of freedom throughout the world.  But we still have the technology and that genie will not and cannot be put back in the bottle, so when and if an altcoin emerges that remains true to the original promise and vision of Bitcoin, I'll go there unless by some miracle the miners jettison core first.



3246. Post 13555120 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: becoin on January 14, 2016, 11:59:24 PM
He's basically claiming that if the blocks ever fill up, then Bitcoin has failed.
I have always suspected this guy is a clueless zombie. Quite the opposite, filled up blocks is not a failure but success! Economy is always about supply and demand. Success of a product or service you are offering is measured by how much demand is surpassing supply.

We're still at less than 50% of the ATH that occurred over TWO YEARS AGO and you call that success?  The only money that's going into transaction fees is the money that's coming out of BTC market cap. You're effectively getting a negative return on the blockspace you're selling. Maybe you were sick the day they taught economics in Economics 101.

Scenario I: (25BTCblockreward+0.2BTCxactionfees)X($1100/BTC)=$27720

Scenario II: (25BTC+6BTCxactionfees)X($450/BTC)=$13950

Success my ass. You're either being stupid or dishonest.  



3247. Post 13555449 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

If you double the blocksize, you also double the fees miners get paid without increasing the rate at all!
This might increase the cost of mining by some tiny fraction but nowhere near 100%. So let's be generous and say 2MB blocks will cost miners 110% of 1 MB Blocks.

So how about this calculation:

scenario A: 12.5BTCblockreward+3BTCxactionfees=15.5 BTCminerreward

scenario B: (12.5BTCblockreward+6BTCxactionfees)/1.1=16.818BTCminerreward

And that doesn't even factor in the very likely probability that BTC exchange rate will go up significantly due to the added utility.

So why do miners object? Could it be that they will get no reward at all because they are mining over a slow internet connection (through TOR or behind the Great Firewall) that means they cannot compete with miners with faster connections?

All the other objections are just to obscure this one. The real one. Forget the decentralization argument. Forget the "any hard fork is too radical" rationalization. These are not honest people and they are taking wealth, not making wealth.






3248. Post 13555632 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: DaRude on January 15, 2016, 01:47:51 AM
If you double the blocksize, you also double the fees miners get paid without increasing the rate at all!
This might increase the cost of mining by some tiny fraction but nowhere near 100%. So let's be generous and say 2MB blocks will cost miners 110% of 1 MB Blocks.

So how about this calculation:

scenario A: 12.5BTCblockreward+3BTCxactionfees=15.5 BTCminerreward

scenario B: (12.5BTCblockreward+6BTCxactionfees)/1.1=16.818BTCminerreward

And that doesn't even factor in the very likely probability that BTC exchange rate will go up significantly due to the added utility.

So why do miners object? Could it be that they will get no reward at all because they are mining over a slow internet connection (through TOR or behind the Great Firewall) that means they cannot compete with miners with faster connections?

All the other objections are just to obscure this one. The real one. Forget the decentralization argument. Forget the "any hard fork is too radical" rationalization. These are not honest people and they are taking wealth, not making wealth.



Maybe cause they want to show solidarity and are hoping for an organic growth of the core without intensifying the fighting and splitting in pro/against camps  Roll Eyes  imagine what would that do to a price

They are showing solidarity with each other, but open hostility to their customers, the users, the holders, the companies and the people that have done the most to promote Bitcoin. That is not how successful business is done.

"organic" growth is a stalling term. There's nothing organic about an arbitrary cap imposed by a cabal of sidechain peddlers and miners with slow connections.  The DDOS attacks and censorship wasn't decreasing the fighting.  Those tactics were used EXCLUSIVELY used by smallblockers. 



3249. Post 13555743 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 15, 2016, 02:29:37 AM
If you double the blocksize, you also double the fees miners get paid without increasing the rate at all!
This might increase the cost of mining by some tiny fraction but nowhere near 100%. So let's be generous and say 2MB blocks will cost miners 110% of 1 MB Blocks.

So how about this calculation:

scenario A: 12.5BTCblockreward+3BTCxactionfees=15.5 BTCminerreward

scenario B: (12.5BTCblockreward+6BTCxactionfees)/1.1=16.818BTCminerreward

And that doesn't even factor in the very likely probability that BTC exchange rate will go up significantly due to the added utility.

So why do miners object? Could it be that they will get no reward at all because they are mining over a slow internet connection (through TOR or behind the Great Firewall) that means they cannot compete with miners with faster connections?

All the other objections are just to obscure this one. The real one. Forget the decentralization argument. Forget the "any hard fork is too radical" rationalization. These are not honest people and they are taking wealth, not making wealth.



Maybe cause they want to show solidarity and are hoping for an organic growth of the core without intensifying the fighting and splitting in pro/against camps  Roll Eyes  imagine what would that do to a price



Maybe also there is a sense that "if it's not broke, then why fix it?"

It IS broken. There was a five year exponential trend that was decisively broken, despite wider adoption, dozens of new use cases, and millions in VC investments. Why? Gavin, Garzik, and Hearn are experts who know what they are talking about.  I don't know code as well as them, but I know economics. It's the science of incentives. All you have to do to get a project to work is to get the incentives right, but if you get them wrong, nothing else matters.

You can have cancer for a long time before it kills you. You can have it for a long time before you even notice. Some problems don't go away when you ignore them. Some problems get worse. If your doctor tells you you have cancer, it may be wise to get a second opinion, but it's extremely dangerous to ignore him, particularly if there are noticeable symptoms.

Scale or die.



3250. Post 13560973 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Burn, Baby. Burn.

There is no guarantee Bitcoin can be saved, but in CANNOT be saved without a crash that wakes up everyone to the threat of the smallblockers.



3251. Post 13561069 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on January 15, 2016, 01:48:46 PM
This has turned quite ugly  Undecided

You ain't seen nothin' yet. It's gonna get uglier.



3252. Post 13566952 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Still almost $26MM in leveraged longs on BFX. If this results in a margin call cascade, we could go under $200 again. Nobody can post dollar margin until Monday.



3253. Post 13567546 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: rolling on January 16, 2016, 12:26:39 AM
This block thing needs to be solved once and for all now and never addressed again. "The Last Hardfork".

Anything less than that and Bitcoin will fail.

It's this kind of thinking of getting a silver bullet rather than an ongoing  process that gets us in trouble

Bitcoin can't fundamentally change and shouldn't change. There is no real governance, nor should there be. It needs set rules and that's it. The idea that it can change is what's getting us in trouble. Sure, added features that conform to the set rules are fine but things that cause hard forks can't happen anymore. The bigger it gets, the harder its going to be for these changes. It has to be a silver bullet or nothing.



I agree that the block size needs to be on a fixed increase schedule, not a one time jump. I also agree that changes will get more difficult over time, but the only way to get the Chinese miners on board is to crash the market.  Their business model doesn't work and they can't hold the rest of the world hostage with their slow-ass internet connections (that goes for TOR miners too).

100% full blocks now. It this the beginning of THE FULLBLOCALYPSE???




3254. Post 13569070 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: rolling on January 16, 2016, 12:55:11 AM
This block thing needs to be solved once and for all now and never addressed again. "The Last Hardfork".

Anything less than that and Bitcoin will fail.

It's this kind of thinking of getting a silver bullet rather than an ongoing  process that gets us in trouble

Bitcoin can't fundamentally change and shouldn't change. There is no real governance, nor should there be. It needs set rules and that's it. The idea that it can change is what's getting us in trouble. Sure, added features that conform to the set rules are fine but things that cause hard forks can't happen anymore. The bigger it gets, the harder its going to be for these changes. It has to be a silver bullet or nothing.



I agree that the block size needs to be on a fixed increase schedule, not a one time jump. I also agree that changes will get more difficult over time, but the only way to get the Chinese miners on board is to crash the market.  Their business model doesn't work and they can't hold the rest of the world hostage with their slow-ass internet connections (that goes for TOR miners too).

100% full blocks now. It this the beginning of THE FULLBLOCALYPSE???



Since we don't know what the future holds, the only logical way to increase block size over time is to re-target like we do with difficulty. Exclude no-fee or micro-fee transactions from the re-target calculation to filter out spam attacks. Done.

No, we need a fixed blocksize doubling like we have a fixed blockreward halving. Entrepreneurs need to plan and adjust their business models just like miners do.  Blockspace is really cheap to produce relative to the value it can provide. Think about it: if a 60GB database is worth 6 or 7 billion dollars, a 600 GB database should be worth ~4-10 times that amount.  The size of the chain is positively correlated with the market cap.



3255. Post 13569168 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: BitUsher on January 16, 2016, 04:10:23 AM
You honestly think these miners would do this [endorse Classic]... if they were happy about the roadmap™?

Most are just frustrated at the infighting , politics, bikeshedding , and lack of consensus. I seriously doubt it has anything to do with the roadmap. They want an increase like everyone else.

Some elements of segwit are likely to be introduced if their benefits outweigh the costs of complexity, and with the clarity/cleaness of a hard fork, the market will control the introduction and timing of such a solution.

If you have evidence that those miners oppose segwit and simply want BIP102 without segwit than please let me know. Otherwise there is essentially is no difference in capacity between classic and core. Under certain circumstances Classic will have a slight amount of higher capacity , under others Core +segwit will have more capacity.

There are reasons where I can criticize segwit with , but am waiting to hear them from you to see if you understand segwit properly(and I believe the upsides outweigh the downsides)  

Segwit is a bigger change to the protocol than BIP102 and entails bigger risk. There is the advantage that it only requires a soft fork, but it's a heluva softfork. There's almost no advantage there. As Hearn said, it's basically an accounting trick. Sure, it's better than nothing, but we just don't believe core anymore when they say that they will EVER raise the block size. They are stalling, and nothing but an actual increase of the cap will convince us otherwise. 



3256. Post 13574863 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

It's very rare to see a low below the previous low on less volume. There will likely be a retest of $152.



3257. Post 13579679 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 16, 2016, 08:08:42 PM
By the way, there was another message by "Satoshi" recently, denying that he was Craig Wright -- and then adding "We are all Satoshi".  That last part is obviously something that Satoshi would not have written. I can only think that the hacker is aware that everybody is aware that the account has been compromised, and does not care to pretend anymore.

Sound, sensible analysis as always. Good to have you home, professor.

The problem is that the anti-fork message was not spoofed and the writing style matches.
http://pastebin.com/Ct5M8fa2

Quote
Here's a quick technical analysis of the email sent to the bitcoin-dev mailing list today at http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010238.html
 
The email was sent from an anonymous email provider called vistomail.com which gives the appearance of being out of service. However you can see the logins at https://webmail.vistomail.com/
 
The vistomail servers are authorised to originate email by their IP address via the SPF DNS records . Satoshi used satoshi@vistomail.com when first announcing Bitcoin http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/014994.html
 
From this you can safely conclude the email did originate from vistomail.com servers and was not spoofed. It does not prove the account was not hacked of course.
 
Partial headers from the email:
  
Received: from mail.vistomail.com (vistomail.com [190.97.163.93])
        by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2175813F
        for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
        Sat, 15 Aug 2015 19:00:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DS04 ([190.97.163.93]) by vistomail.com with MailEnable ESMTP;
        Sat, 15 Aug 2015 13:51:14 -0500
 

DNS RECORDS FOLLOW:
  
vistomail.com descriptive text "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ip4:190.97.163.93 ~all"
vistomail.com has address 190.97.163.93
vistomail.com mail is handled by 10 vistomail.com.


The "we are all satoshi" was spoofed and the writing style or expressions didn't match. So the second doesn't invalidate the first.

Additionally, that particular email address is not known to have been stolen.

Therefore the August message could be legit - it's a very serious risk for BTC. Risk, in the sense that if the proposed fork goes ahead, we'll have Satoshi's second coming after the forkageddon to proclaim Bitcoin is a failure since it failed to protect itself from this kind of attack.

Is everybody forgetting that SM had a PGP signature that hasn't been used since he disappeared? He's a cryptographer, for Christ's sake. Or he could have signed with the private key of an early BTC address.

If you want somebody to believe you and have the means to prove you are telling the truth, but don't, YOU ARE STUPID.

Satoshi isn't stupid. The people who believe these impostors are.



3258. Post 13580318 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

It sure is nice, sitting here lending out my fiat at >%20 annual return. I don't have to worry about dumps, crashes, hard forks or network congestion failures.  I don't care if it goes up, either, because that just boosts the interest rate I get paid. 




3259. Post 13580438 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: dropt on January 17, 2016, 05:21:25 AM
It sure is nice, sitting here lending out my fiat at >%20 annual return. I don't have to worry about dumps, crashes, hard forks or network congestion failures.  I don't care if it goes up, either, because that just boosts the interest rate I get paid. 

Will you shut up already.  Just the other day you were whinging about having your life savings tied up in the market, mere weeks after you claimed you had sold off most of your coins and working on the rest.

You're full of shit and not fooling anyone.

No contradiction at all. I still have the cold storage coins I bought in 2011, but my trading account is almost entirely cash, except what I haven't flipped from yesterday's dip.

Look, it's either gonna go down or up eventually, but this way I get paid to wait.  Can you say the same?



3260. Post 13581029 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: lyth0s on January 17, 2016, 06:59:51 AM
It sure is nice, sitting here lending out my fiat at >%20 annual return. I don't have to worry about dumps, crashes, hard forks or network congestion failures.  I don't care if it goes up, either, because that just boosts the interest rate I get paid.  



How much did you buy your account from the original owner for? I don't remember you being that emotional nor negative.

It's still me. I'm negative because I know markets hate uncertainty. We have a capacity issue with an uncertain outcome.  If nothing changes, we're going to reach maximum capacity soon and congestion problems  with costs (higher fees) will arrive which will drive the price down. If nothing changes, growth will grind to a halt at some point BEFORE the halving. If something does happen to increase capacity, meaning by some miracle we get a consensus on how to scale, then that will cause great uncertainty. There will be winners and losers. There are risks.

The technicals and fundamentals point down for at least the short to intermediate term.




3261. Post 13598365 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: r0ach on January 18, 2016, 06:59:15 AM

  Any finite commodity like gold where you can attempt to corner the market is a pyramid scheme.

Gold isn't really finite in the economic sense. All of the gold on earth could coat the surface 8 feet thick. Only our ability to extract it is finite, and that changes with technology.  It's currently running~ 3% annual inflation, meaning the supply is growing by ~3% per year.

Most of the easily extracted gold has been mined, so what's left is more difficult/expensive to get, but we'll likely never run out.

Cornering the market in gold would drive the price up to the point where gold that was previously too expensive to extract gets mined. Bitcoin is different. A higher price will likely result in more mining activity, but not more bitcoins being mined.  Miners could sell a smaller portion of their mined coins to meet expenses, allowing them to keep more for themselves.  Basically it's a much less liquid market, one reason why it is so much more volatile.



3262. Post 13598639 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: bitebits on January 18, 2016, 07:47:19 PM
A higher price will likely result in more mining activity, but not more bitcoins being mined.  Miners could sell a smaller portion of their mined coins to meet expenses, allowing them to keep more for themselves.  Basically it's a much less liquid market, one reason why it is so much more volatile.

Those two statements don't go together. More mining activity = more costs. It will always level out, that is the beauty of mining.

Right. Difficulty and exchange rate are related, but production rate is constant until the next halving.  What I'm saying is it's much easier to pump the price of BTC than gold. The question we should be asking ourselves is whether or not to expect a pump and whether or not current price is the result of such a pump already having happened.

That lack of liquidity is a huge problem. Bitcoin is basically worthless as a unit of account, even as it's utility as a store of value skyrockets because of disinflation. It's value as a medium of exchange is determined by the network capacity, which is maxing out soon unless there is an upgrade.

Unless something changes, BTC will remain a speculative commodity, not a money.



3263. Post 13598965 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: bitebits on January 18, 2016, 08:09:13 PM

It really is. Time for both sides to look into the mirror and do some serious self reflection. This quote does actually worry me, because he is right:

Quote
Unfortunately, I believe bitcoin development has lost touch with large-scale rollout necessities over the past year or so.
[...]
That's why I'm concerned when I'm looking at the features of 0.12. [...] What I see is instead engineering for the sake of engineering.

Quote
The question of "who's the customer?" seems to have gotten lost in the process.

That's the money quote, IMHO. Blockstream appears to want to infect the world with a disease so they can sell the cure. I know that's uncharitable, but there is no other plausible explanation for their obstinacy other than a complete lack of business acumen.



3264. Post 13599104 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: becoin on January 18, 2016, 07:47:40 PM
When you take away child's toy, he is upset...His reaction just shows his arrogance for the last couple of months
Thinking of upset Hearn joining R3 and arrogantly ragequitting. Now banks getting behind Garzik's "classic" fork. It is too obvious what is going on.

Banks need bitcoin blockchain but without bitcoin and that's exactly what big-blockers are doing crippling bitcoin as store of value. Hurray... free block space to every spammer!
Only dumb people think there is a need to have a blocksize limit in order to have the store of value function.
Only dumb people think miners can pay their bills with the miserable tx fees big-blockers are willing to pay.

What kind of person thinks a company exists to employ people? Your statement betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of economics. The network does not exist to support the miners. Miners exist to support the network. 



3265. Post 13599160 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 18, 2016, 08:40:34 PM
Do you even realize that the long term outcome of Lightning (the Holy Graal of Core folks) would be to massively reduce the amount of transaction fees versus an on-chain scaling?

Wait, what?

Core is simultaneously accused that they want "higher fees" or "fee competition" and now accused for "wanting to massively reduce fees with lightning".

Please decide what core wants.

You know those car dealerships that jack up the price before giving you a discount? Blockstream is selling something that would have no value if Core did their jobs. Wait, what? They're the same people? OHHHhhhh.



3266. Post 13599273 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: becoin on January 18, 2016, 08:54:35 PM
When you take away child's toy, he is upset...His reaction just shows his arrogance for the last couple of months
Thinking of upset Hearn joining R3 and arrogantly ragequitting. Now banks getting behind Garzik's "classic" fork. It is too obvious what is going on.

Banks need bitcoin blockchain but without bitcoin and that's exactly what big-blockers are doing crippling bitcoin as store of value. Hurray... free block space to every spammer!
Only dumb people think there is a need to have a blocksize limit in order to have the store of value function.
Only dumb people think miners can pay their bills with the miserable tx fees big-blockers are willing to pay.

What kind of person thinks a company exists to employ people? Your statement betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of economics. The network does not exist to support the miners. Miners exist to support the network. 
Only dumb people can say that people are not using bitcoin because blocks are full. It is like saying people don't use this place because it is overcrowded.

Compared to what? Is bitcoin being used compared to VISA, SWIFT, ACH, Western Union? Moneygram? Mastercard? Gold? Dollars? 

Bitcoin is a toy network and you apparently want it to stay a toy for some reason.



3267. Post 13599335 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on January 18, 2016, 08:54:52 PM
Do you even realize that the long term outcome of Lightning (the Holy Graal of Core folks) would be to massively reduce the amount of transaction fees versus an on-chain scaling?

Wait, what?

Core is simultaneously accused that they want "higher fees" or "fee competition" and now accused for "wanting to massively reduce fees with lightning".

Please decide what core wants.
Core people are clueless about economics. They doesn't understand the consequences of their wishes.

Maybe you are able to think for yourself and see what they don't see. What is the long term outcome which produces the more transaction fees: on chain scaling or off chain scaling (e.g. Lightning)?

DING DING DING!!! WE have a winner. Thank you for stating clearly what so many of us were thinking.

The ugly answer could be that they don't really care about miner compensation or network security as much as they care about getting their slice (which they would actually be TAKING from the miners).



3268. Post 13599590 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 18, 2016, 09:24:54 PM
The ugly answer could be that they don't really care about miner compensation or network security as much as they care about getting their slice (which they would actually be TAKING from the miners).

Now you care about miner compensation and network security? Weren't you the one complaining that you don't want to pay fees because you've bought the right to transact when you bought your coins, etc etc?

High fees = "fuck core devs"
Low fees = "fuck core devs"

For real?

I have said over and over that miners will get more fees if there are more transactions per block. I have said repeatedly that gross miner compensation will go up if we get bigger blocks because the exchange rate will go up because of increased network utility. I have also said many times that I consider miners employees, and any businessman knows that employees don't work if they don't get paid.  Owners (hodlers) and employees both exist to serve customers. Both will be out of a job if we don't do that. 

It's not personal. The Core Devs just have a poor business model.  They can outcompete dinosaurs in a niche market and so they think they should be rent-seeking, but they are ignoring the alts waiting in the wings for them to slip up.  Any businessman worth his salt will tell you that if you don't see the competition, it's not because it isn't there. It's because you aren't looking hard enough. 



3269. Post 13599902 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: coinzat on January 18, 2016, 10:08:11 PM


blocks are not always full as some people think.
I think some people are making useless transactions to make the blocks full and promote for their block size increasement . and that is why most of the blocks where full in the last few days



why does it matter? If you impose a maxblock size, you may increase the fees paid by bad actors, but you increase the fees for everybody else, too. If you impose a max block size, all you are doing is decreasing the number of bogus transactions needed to congest the network! 

You're not making it harder or easier to prevent a spam attack by keeping blocksize small. You're just transferring the cost of spam prevention from the miners to the users, who will naturally be willing to pay less for their bitcoins, so the miners save nothing and the users use less.  You're trying to cure a headache with a guillotine.



3270. Post 13600213 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 18, 2016, 10:23:53 PM
This means the protocol can accommodate an increase of an extra 53-58% in txs (and that includes dust and spam txs like the ones we have now).

This is faulty thinking. We will start to experience serious issues well before 100% and user experience issues even before that. Already several times we have had two full blocks in a row and possibly other times more that I don't recall.

It is not enough that transactions occur eventually, they should also happen in a timely manner.

My postal service has at least 3 different speeds. A priority, B priority and express. And I can also use private courier for even faster. So 4 types of fees for 4 different delivery speeds.

If I don't care about the speed, I'll go second priority. If I do, I'll pay the premium. It's that simple.

There's no entitlement that I can produce all kind of spam and they have to be included in one or a few blocks (for peanuts).

You pay the fee, you are in. In a timely manner.

If you're buying a coffee or are a retailer with a POS terminal, you need the transaction to go through fast. If you're buying a tanker full of North Atlantic crude, you can wait a few hours. It's the small transactions that need to go through fast, and the 1MB cap is making that impossible. BUT You will never get the crude transaction if you don't get enough of the smaller transactions for Bitcoin to build up it's market cap and liquidity.  There will be a need for LN type sidechains in the future ONLY if we don't get too greedy by building a xaction fee market before the BTC market is ready.

If you estimate how many MW/sec the mining network consumes and compare it to how many xactions/sec it processes, you can tell mathematically how much a BTC xaction really costs at a given power cost. Currently, this is between $2-5 PER transaction (according to Toomim, an electrical engineer) and is not significantly cheaper than legacy payment systems. This can be fixed by increasing the block size. 




3271. Post 13600292 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

All the other bigblockers are making better arguments than me. Maybe I should just shut up for a while. Carry on.



3272. Post 13600641 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 18, 2016, 11:06:21 PM
All the other bigblockers are making better arguments than me. Maybe I should just shut up for a while. Carry on.

All of your arguments are equally specious ... and not just you, but all of them should learn some humility and know when to shut up.

Oh, really? Who are you and what have you done with the real Marcus Augustus? The guy I used to know would not mistake an assertion for an argument. What bias is preventing you from seeing what is so obvious to us?

Something isn't valuable just because it's scarce. It has to be useful and scarce. There's thousands of artists out there selling one-of-a-kind paintings for rent money or less for every Slavador Dali or Monet.

You can't say Bitcoin's Network Effect prevents competition while limiting the size of the network. That's just inviting the very competition to which you claim Bitcoin is immune. Just because security decreases network efficiency doesn't mean all inefficiency is increased security. Sometimes inefficiency is just added complexity and friction.





3273. Post 13600756 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 18, 2016, 11:42:34 PM


Parcel delivery services overcharge you to avoid dynamic charge.


False. Parcel services do what their customers want them to do or they go out of business. It's the customers who demand a static charge so that they can know what their future expenses will be.  Unless you are suggesting that UPS, FedEx, USPS etc are all colluding against the public.



3274. Post 13600787 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 18, 2016, 11:58:05 PM
Do you really believe those chart buddy numbers?

So you're calling me a liar. Either

1)Prove it

2)Apologize.

3)Show the world that you're a man of no honor.


I think that I already elaborated on what I had meant in my earlier posts regarding the reason for my chartbuddy comment, and again I have not been calling you a liar.. nor accusing you of any purposeful attempts at misrepresentation. 

I will apologize to the extent that my words may have been read by you and possibly others as implying some level of purposeful misrepresentation coming from you, because so far, up until now, I have not witnessed any such attempts from you to purposefully misrepresent in regards to chartbuddy.


Anyhow, I believe that there is a need for all of us to retain a certain amount of thicked skinnedness when dealing with some of these forum matters and comments that we receive that may seem to be criticsms and reflections of non-appreciation, and surely over the years, I have received my fair share of what I would count as selective and emotional unwarranted attacks on me (and others may assert that I deserved every single bit and maybe even more of some of those attacks that I received)... hahahahaha    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy   Can we make up?   Wink

You got more out him than I did, Richie. JJG either gets punched out a lot or he cowardly limits calling people liars to online forums. 



3275. Post 13600981 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 19, 2016, 12:26:33 AM
All the other bigblockers are making better arguments than me. Maybe I should just shut up for a while. Carry on.

All of your arguments are equally specious ... and not just you, but all of them should learn some humility and know when to shut up.

You can't say Bitcoin's Network Effect prevents competition while limiting the size of the network.


What you guise have totally missed in all your big-block bullrage is that scalability does not mean what you think it means. The network of transactions can grow exponentially while the blocksize may only need to grow linearly or not at all. Blocksize is NOT the only measure for the size of Bitcoin's Network Effect (and yes we all want to get-rich-quick from Bitcoin's fabled Network Effect peter_r-Metcalfe-pretty-coloured-gif). Bitcoin the currency can have many different layered solutions that will scale the total transaction capacity and currency network effects without loading it all onto the core bitcoin network infrastructure (that is not ready for it and will never handle all the world's current transactions for decades anyway).

The necessity of splitting out the various functions of the original satoshi prototype client, mining, network-transport, validation, wallet into an ecosystem of layered technologies is a natural manifestation of bitcoin's success. It needs to be done anyway and will be done at some point. Layered architectures are totally uncontroversial and well-understood approaches to scaling up and broadening out network capacities using stacks of technology instead of monolithic clients that do all functions and end up full of magic hard-wired constants and temporary hacks (like blocksize 'bumps'). We need to solve the hard problems now and not delay it with the seemingly easy, quick, cheap fix that will risk killing bitcoin in the future, near or far.

tl;dr rethink your premises, blocksize is not equal to network size.

Blocksize determines the number of trustless peer-to-peer transactions. If it's not peer-to-peer, it's not Bitcoin. It's like people trading gold-backed dollars in 1971 thinking they were trading gold. There weren't. Nixon proved that in a way that was rather unpleasant to anyone long USD.



3276. Post 13601045 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 19, 2016, 12:23:08 AM
Do you really believe those chart buddy numbers?

So you're calling me a liar. Either

1)Prove it

2)Apologize.

3)Show the world that you're a man of no honor.


I think that I already elaborated on what I had meant in my earlier posts regarding the reason for my chartbuddy comment, and again I have not been calling you a liar.. nor accusing you of any purposeful attempts at misrepresentation.  

I will apologize to the extent that my words may have been read by you and possibly others as implying some level of purposeful misrepresentation coming from you, because so far, up until now, I have not witnessed any such attempts from you to purposefully misrepresent in regards to chartbuddy.


Anyhow, I believe that there is a need for all of us to retain a certain amount of thicked skinnedness when dealing with some of these forum matters and comments that we receive that may seem to be criticsms and reflections of non-appreciation, and surely over the years, I have received my fair share of what I would count as selective and emotional unwarranted attacks on me (and others may assert that I deserved every single bit and maybe even more of some of those attacks that I received)... hahahahaha    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy   Can we make up?   Wink

You got more out him than I did, Richie. JJG either gets punched out a lot or he cowardly limits calling people liars to online forums.  

BJA... seems to be proving my point.... .. likes to stir shit and point fingers... .. and describe various of his supposed/hypothetical BTC investment strategies that make little to no sense because he is constantly a high-baller and winning like a mo fo... no matter what. yet, we keep thinking that he is leaving BTC, but in reality, he is never gonna leave cause he is going to whine and shit-stir no matter what the outcomes, even if we witness him getting his way, he will stay around, continue to post disingenuous half truth, point fingers at others and just ask for more and more of what he wants....




All you had to do to get rid of me was keep pumping the market until I had liquidated all my holdings, but no, you couldn't keep doing that, could you? Too many people saw through the smallblocker bullshit.

Anyone following my lead has made money in the last month. Anyone following yours has lost about 15%.  Who's adding value here?



3277. Post 13601754 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

I don't know why this didn't occur to me until just now, but with well over 50% hashing power in China, what happens if the Communist Party confiscates all the mines? Then instead of shutting them down, they merge the pools and double spend until the price crashes to pennies.

It wouldn't even do any good to fork away from them.  They have the ASICs, so they could just jump on the new fork and double spend again.

I think this is the biggest security threat to Bitcoin right now. This is a bigger threat than pools, massive miner farms, fewer nodes, anything.   

These mines are too big to hide. If the ChiComs don't know where they all are, they could easily find out.

The Red Chinese government is the only power on earth that could shut down Bitcoin right now, but they could do it with a few phone calls.   They have reasons for doing it too, from preserving the value of the Renmimbi to enforcing capital controls, to consumer protection to regulating commerce to protecting incumbent players or even propping up their preferred altcoin (Litecoin?)




3278. Post 13601824 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 19, 2016, 02:54:50 AM
Do you really believe those chart buddy numbers?

So you're calling me a liar. Either

1)Prove it

2)Apologize.

3)Show the world that you're a man of no honor.


I think that I already elaborated on what I had meant in my earlier posts regarding the reason for my chartbuddy comment, and again I have not been calling you a liar.. nor accusing you of any purposeful attempts at misrepresentation.  

I will apologize to the extent that my words may have been read by you and possibly others as implying some level of purposeful misrepresentation coming from you, because so far, up until now, I have not witnessed any such attempts from you to purposefully misrepresent in regards to chartbuddy.


Anyhow, I believe that there is a need for all of us to retain a certain amount of thicked skinnedness when dealing with some of these forum matters and comments that we receive that may seem to be criticsms and reflections of non-appreciation, and surely over the years, I have received my fair share of what I would count as selective and emotional unwarranted attacks on me (and others may assert that I deserved every single bit and maybe even more of some of those attacks that I received)... hahahahaha    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy   Can we make up?   Wink

You got more out him than I did, Richie. JJG either gets punched out a lot or he cowardly limits calling people liars to online forums.  

BJA... seems to be proving my point.... .. likes to stir shit and point fingers... .. and describe various of his supposed/hypothetical BTC investment strategies that make little to no sense because he is constantly a high-baller and winning like a mo fo... no matter what. yet, we keep thinking that he is leaving BTC, but in reality, he is never gonna leave cause he is going to whine and shit-stir no matter what the outcomes, even if we witness him getting his way, he will stay around, continue to post disingenuous half truth, point fingers at others and just ask for more and more of what he wants....




All you had to do to get rid of me was keep pumping the market until I had liquidated all my holdings, but no, you couldn't keep doing that, could you? Too many people saw through the smallblocker bullshit.

Anyone following my lead has made money in the last month. Anyone following yours has lost about 15%.  Who's adding value here?


Hellrow?Huh    don't mischaracterize my position for some cheap thrill and strawman argument.   I could give a ratt's ass about whatever is adopted regarding scaling, so long as there is some kind of vetting and non-rush into some fearmongered position.


Regarding price, it is likely affected by manipulation in these times more than anything when  we coincidentally have several stories coming out at once while there is some simultaneous dumping in an attempt to create some fear and to shake some weak hands.... Yes, surely, I hope that the current bull market does not transition into a bear market because that probably would not be good for bitcoin, but it seems that we are a ways from such a transition.. maybe we would need to experience prolonged prices below $330 before we would be able to call that bitcoin is no longer in a bull market.

Hellrow? Do you know what the commonly accepted definition of a bear market is? It's a market that has dropped greater than 20%. We have been in a bear market for over two years. we've dropped more than 20% from the November high of $504. We've dropped more than 20% from the more recent December high of $475. just this month, the drop from $465 to $352.50 was 24.2%.
WE ARE IN A BEAR MARKET, DIPSHIT



3279. Post 13601915 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 19, 2016, 03:10:56 AM
I don't know why this didn't occur to me until just now, but with well over 50% hashing power in China, what happens if the Communist Party confiscates all the mines? Then instead of shutting them down, they merge the pools and double spend until the price crashes to pennies.

It wouldn't even do any good to fork away from them.  They have the ASICs, so they could just jump on the new fork and double spend again.

I think this is the biggest security threat to Bitcoin right now. This is a bigger threat than pools, massive miner farms, fewer nodes, anything.   

These mines are too big to hide. If the ChiComs don't know where they all are, they could easily find out.

The Red Chinese government is the only power on earth that could shut down Bitcoin right now, but they could do it with a few phone calls.   They have reasons for doing it too, from preserving the value of the Renmimbi to enforcing capital controls, to consumer protection to regulating commerce to protecting incumbent players or even propping up their preferred altcoin (Litecoin?)




Yeah, when one set of FUD doesn't work, shift over to something else...

You must be having a good ole time coming up with various lil fantasy scenarios.

It's not just paranoia, you squirrel-brained boob. The Chi-coms have a history of nationalizing businesses, industries and whole sectors of the economy. They've done it more than any other government in history with the possible exception of the Soviets.





3280. Post 13602535 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 19, 2016, 04:33:36 AM


You got more out him than I did, Richie. JJG either gets punched out a lot or he cowardly limits calling people liars to online forums.  

BJA... seems to be proving my point.... .. likes to stir shit and point fingers... .. and describe various of his supposed/hypothetical BTC investment strategies that make little to no sense because he is constantly a high-baller and winning like a mo fo... no matter what. yet, we keep thinking that he is leaving BTC, but in reality, he is never gonna leave cause he is going to whine and shit-stir no matter what the outcomes, even if we witness him getting his way, he will stay around, continue to post disingenuous half truth, point fingers at others and just ask for more and more of what he wants....




All you had to do to get rid of me was keep pumping the market until I had liquidated all my holdings, but no, you couldn't keep doing that, could you? Too many people saw through the smallblocker bullshit.

Anyone following my lead has made money in the last month. Anyone following yours has lost about 15%.  Who's adding value here?


Hellrow?Huh    don't mischaracterize my position for some cheap thrill and strawman argument.   I could give a ratt's ass about whatever is adopted regarding scaling, so long as there is some kind of vetting and non-rush into some fearmongered position.


Regarding price, it is likely affected by manipulation in these times more than anything when  we coincidentally have several stories coming out at once while there is some simultaneous dumping in an attempt to create some fear and to shake some weak hands.... Yes, surely, I hope that the current bull market does not transition into a bear market because that probably would not be good for bitcoin, but it seems that we are a ways from such a transition.. maybe we would need to experience prolonged prices below $330 before we would be able to call that bitcoin is no longer in a bull market.

Hellrow? Do you know what the commonly accepted definition of a bear market is? It's a market that has dropped greater than 20%. We have been in a bear market for over two years. we've dropped more than 20% from the November high of $504. We've dropped more than 20% from the more recent December high of $475. just this month, the drop from $465 to $352.50 was 24.2%.
WE ARE IN A BEAR MARKET, DIPSHIT


Hahahaha. Look at you? 

Appearing desperate in your stretched and selective definitions in what you are deeming to be a "bear market." 

In order to come off as somewhat believable, rather than an inadequate chicken little wannabe, you need to look at Bitcoin's history and fundamentals a bit more broadly, rather than selectively choosing some price spikes and throwing out random attempts at appealing to authority numbers.

Gotta find some humor in your ridiculous bold assertions.

Yours truly, DIPSHIT.....   not.  🤓🤓🤓🤓

From Wikipedia:
"While there’s no agreed-upon definition of a bear market, one generally accepted measure is a price decline of 20% or more over at least a two-month period." from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_trend

From http://content.moneyinstructor.com/693/what-bull-bear-market.html
"If the markets fall by more than 20% then we have entered a bear market. "

From investopedia:
"Although figures can vary, for many, a downturn of 20\% or more in multiple broad market indexes, such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) or Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500), over at least a two-month period, is considered an entry into a bear market.

Read more: Bear Market Definition | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bearmarket.asp#ixzz3xfIUiEIk





3281. Post 13602598 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 19, 2016, 04:53:14 AM

Would this business plan (LN) make sense in Austrian economics, perhaps?

Obviously not. I hope this is a sarcastic question. Generally speaking, Austrian economics studies how third party (usually government) interference in the markets distorts price signals, leading to misallocations of capital resources.  This includes creating by fiat markets that wouldn't otherwise exist, such as carbon credits or auctioning off rights that aren't even owned by the entity selling them such as radio frequencies.

Both of the above examples of artificial scarcity solve problems, but create other problems that are harder to spot at first. "Seeing the unseen", the unintended consequences, that is the heart of Austrian Economics.

 




3282. Post 13611108 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: kehtolo on January 19, 2016, 01:34:03 PM
Nah.. I've been seeing 'Fullblockalypse' around for a while now...

It's my creation. I expect a satoshi any time you use it.



3283. Post 13611803 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Does anybody know which exchanges offer cryptographic proof of reserves? It seems like an obvious selling point to any that want to gain market share.



3284. Post 13611872 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

on BFX: That 500 coin wall at $375.01 has withstood two attacks. I suspect it will be tested again. If Stamp or another major exchange goes below $370, it's dust. Price keeps bouncing off it, but not as high as the last time.



3285. Post 13612158 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 20, 2016, 01:25:28 AM
Sounds like get everything the fuck into cold storage to me & await the chaos.


Why does everyone seem so certain this will blow over? I think it will, but it's not even close to a certainty, in any amount of time. This is the largest test of Bitcoin's anti-fragility yet and it's likely to get worse before it gets better. BitcoinClassic isn't an implementation. It's a proposed governance model that is only promising.  When concrete proposals get rolled out to be attacked, criticized and nitpicked, support may waver. 

The game isn't over. It's not even half time yet. We won't win until the longest chain has a block in it bigger than 1MB.  There's a bunch of stuff that can go wrong before then. Hell, it's possible something could go wrong AFTER that.

There are three main possibilities:
1. Bitcoin goes down before it comes back up.
2. Bitcoin could go up before it crashes again.
3. It could go down and stay down, like the Japanese stock market. 2 decades later and nowhere near it's all-time high.

The one thing that almost certainly will not happen is it goes up and stays up, because that would bring in new users and the network can't handle them. Fees higher than Mastercard AND the ChiComs have the kill switch?  Hey, what's this GooglePay app preinstalled on my new phone?



3286. Post 13612216 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: coins101 on January 20, 2016, 02:11:26 AM
.....

There are three main possibilities:
1. Bitcoin goes down before it comes back up.
2. Bitcoin could go up before it crashes again.
3. It could go down and stay down, like the Japanese stock market. 2 decades later and nowhere near it's all-time high.
...

Price goes down over uncertainty of Core vs. Classic fork; resolution with Classic winning; price shoots up to $888 before the block halving in July.

Its a dead cert things will pan out as I have stated. Go sell your house and put everything on a quick short, then double up long.

If $888's the top, what the bottom?

I have coins in cold storage worth considerably more than my house.



3287. Post 13616948 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: spiderbrain on January 20, 2016, 01:42:25 PM
I really feel like someone knows something I don't! Maybe there's been a bitcoin dev compromise...?

I think it's a technical rally. The 4 HR Moving average went green. TERA trades that and maybe others.



3288. Post 13617071 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

People's Bank of China apparently is saying they may issue a digital currency. I don't know why this would be good news for Bitcoin. It's a massive potential competitor and the Commies may want to help it by discouraging Bitcoin.

Worst case scenario, they nationalize the Chinese mines for use with their currency.



3289. Post 13622685 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Crash, bounce, pause, spike....

It's a four punch raid. wait for the shorters to get squeezed and then short like crazy.

Be careful about the second bounce.




3290. Post 13623100 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Richy_T on January 21, 2016, 12:24:01 AM
Blocks are full. Let's see what happens.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/41whvw/maximum_of_transactions_second_that_bitcoin_can/cz5v60m

It's the FULLBLOCALYPSETM



3291. Post 13623226 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 21, 2016, 12:38:04 AM

I think I'm done arguing. It just has to play out now.

(I was actually going to use that word but couldn't remember it exactly.)

big blocker capitulation is close ... they have no logical ground to stand on and the whole edifice is crumbling, Crassic was just the Hearn echo swansong

You don't seem to understand. Bigblockers will win if we crash the price far enough to persuade the miners to switch. If we fail in that, it's because the price is going up and they have no reason to listen to us. (if it ain't broke, don't fix it). So it's simple. Just keep pumping until we go away. That's how you'll get us to capitulate.




3292. Post 13623376 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 21, 2016, 12:55:24 AM
You don't seem to understand. Bigblockers will win if we crash the price far enough to persuade the miners to switch. If we fail in that, it's because the price is going up and they have no reason to listen to us. (if it ain't broke, don't fix it). So it's simple. Just keep pumping until we go away. That's how you'll get us to capitulate.



Did you miss the bit when it's been tried & failed a number of times now?

Yeah, well we'll see what happens when xaction fees triple and then triple again. 



3293. Post 13623426 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 21, 2016, 01:16:22 AM
You don't seem to understand. Bigblockers will win if we crash the price far enough to persuade the miners to switch. If we fail in that, it's because the price is going up and they have no reason to listen to us. (if it ain't broke, don't fix it). So it's simple. Just keep pumping until we go away. That's how you'll get us to capitulate.



Did you miss the bit when it's been tried & failed a number of times now?

Yeah, well we'll see what happens when xaction fees triple and then triple again. 

We can all hop on PBoCCoin?

What do you think we have now? Nothing happens with the 70% of hashpower that's in China that the PBoC doesn't let happen.  They could take over our whole network with a few phone calls. These giant mines exist and operate only because the Communist Party backed by the People's Army lets them.

Hell, my trading account is in Hong Kong and is also under the ChiCom's thumb. This isn't what we had in mind when we bought into a distributed trustless payment system.



3294. Post 13624497 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: keewee on January 21, 2016, 04:36:18 AM

Hmmm. Well potentially they already have the necessary infrastructure for their new coin if they decide to repurpose it away from Bitcoin...

That's the same thing I thought.



3295. Post 13630527 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: petahashminer on January 21, 2016, 12:16:09 PM
total hashrate has increased 20% in the last 4 days, i think this is a good sign of organic growth too.

It's probably the bitfury 16nm miners coming online. If they can Get chinese hashpower to drop below 50%, this is a really good development. At present, We are in danger of the Red Chinese government either taking over Bitcoin or destroying it if they want to.

Unfortunately, the Chinese just completed a 14nm tapeout, so the majority of hashpower will continue to be produced by a handful of large mines in a country with a totalitarian government, pretty much the exact opposite of what Bitcoin was supposed to be.




3296. Post 13631419 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 21, 2016, 04:13:40 PM

I know that it is difficult to understand why democracy is "the worst system of government, excluding all the others".  It takes the ability to think socially: "Whatever I can think, do, want, or get, others can think, do, want, or get too".

Libertarians and anarchists are notoriously unable to think that way.  So, when they conclude that the choices of a minority should prevail over those of the majority, they always assume implicitly that it will be their minority, not some other minority.

You don't understand us at all, Prof. The Core devs aren't anarchists. It's early adopters like me who are. Libertarians and anarcho-capitalists most commonly are Natural Rights advocates and not utilitarians, so you can be forgiven for misunderstanding us, but if you really dive into the philosophy and economics of it, you'll find that most of us are on the other side in this conflict.

Deomocracy, in the sense of one person one vote for control over pooled resources, is inefficient because there is no way to communicate the intensity of one's preferences. That is one objection. The main objection is that we don't believe you can delegate your right to a government if you don't have that right in the first place, so for example, if you don't have the right to take by force from your neighbor because you need his property more than he does, then you don't have that right even if the majority of voters decide that you do.

No, in political and economic issues, we are basically saying it's got to be win-win or no deal. Zero-sum game theory is relevant only in that we seek to reduce as much as possible the cases in which it applies.

In the present conflict, here is how I see it: Miners have every right to run whichever version they choose. Developers have every right to contribute to whatever version of the client they wish.  investors and speculators have every right to buy or sell as much as they want.  Everyone has a right to run or not run any node they like. 

I would like Core/Blockstream to get on board with a blocksize increase, but I don't think that's going to happen unless circumstances change significantly and they may never get on board. That's their right. I will support any proposed scaling solution that looks like it has a reasonable chance of success, but I don't think Core or the miners that support them will change positions without a major loss in market cap. This puts me in a weird position:

If the market stays up or goes higher, I sell. If the market goes lower, I hold, because it means we are more likely to get a scaling solution one way or another.  The market is more democratic than democracy. I can vote with my wallet. So can you. So can anybody.

In my opinion, a higher price will attract new users and bring on the very network congestion the transaction fees are supposed to overcome. There will be a period in which low value transactions will diminish due to loss of economic viability and be replaced by higher value transaction, but eventually all growth will plateau and stop.

I don't know if this issue will EVER be resolved, and that will be a tragedy, but this will play out in the market, as it should. Either Bitcoin will scale or another coin that is found to be more useful by the market will.  Core has no more power than the market gives them. Miners have no more power than traders/investors/speculators give them.  If we reward them for doing something stupid, it's our fault when they do it.






3297. Post 13631920 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

I'm a fan of Murray Rothbard, but I don't like the term "anarcho-capitalist" that he coined, because, although it is technically accurate, it is misleading to laymen.  Rothbard was an anarchist in the sense that he believed in "no rulers", but he absolutely believed in order and thought the central State was ultimately an agent of disorder and I agree with him.

I prefer to use the term "distributed governance".  Hierarchies are found throughout nature and I think it is contrary to human nature and therefor impossible to eliminate them entirely. But I still think Political power should be reduced as much as possible and reducing the amount of pooled resources to squabble over is a step in that direction. 

We can also dramatically reduce violence if it becomes taboo to ever initiate it, meaning defensive force is the only kind with any social sanction. The problem arises that there are differing views on what exactly constitutes "initiatory violence." This is because there are differing views on how threatening speech has to be before it constitutes an actual threat and because defense of property depends on the definition of rightful property.  Still, I think these problems are solvable after a few generations of children raised without corporal punishment grow up.




3298. Post 13632245 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 21, 2016, 06:39:50 PM
The answer to your question of attacking one of the chains seems to be valid, still.

I don't think so...

When a fork is proposed, like XT or Classic (with 75% trigger and a few weeks of grace period between the trigger and the switch to new rules), I think that:

* Before the fork, holders should pray that it resolves neatly and quickly as a non-event, and keep quiet or voice their preferences quietly, so that it does not upset the price;

* If the proposal gains some support, but neither reaches 75% nor drops back to zero, and it looks like the impasse may continue for a while, they may want to speak out for one outcome, to help break the impasse -- but that may make things worse if they themselves cant agree on which side to support.   They may want to sell while the price is still OK, justin case; but that may cause the price to crash.  Or they may choose to bet on the price recovering later, and keep holding.

* If the proposal gets little suport and seems to be a sure fail, the holders shoul shout it down.

* If the proposal gets 51% and keeps increasing, the holders should cheer it along.

* If the proposal gets the required support and triggers, the holders should upgrade their clients accept it, and do what they can to convince the remaining miners and players to accept it too.

* If the change has triggered, but at the end of the grace period there is still a non-negligible fraction of the miners that refuse to accep it, then the holders should try to convince the exchanges and other services to boycott the minority chain and refuse its coins, and convince the miners to sabotage the minority chain.

When a minority can veto, we have what amounts to a game of "chicken". In the game of chicken, the side perceived to be the craziest and most hell-bent on winning at any cost (including their own destruction) is the side that wins.  This right now is the side of the smallblockers, unfortunately.  That's why I think this will take a while to play out, longer in fact than it will take to fill the blocks and hike fees. Possibly long enough to get a network congestion failure. 



3299. Post 13632318 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

riddle me this, cripplecoiners:

1. How do you grow network effects without scaling?
2. How do you attract new users by increasing fees and slowing service?
3. How do you reduce friction by increasing complexity?
4. How can you call a network dominated by a handful of miners in a totalitarian state decentralized?

Do you think code developers have or should have any accountability to the people who actually use their software?  If it's open source, shouldn't we have the right to modify it in any way we see fit?



3300. Post 13632593 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: ImI on January 21, 2016, 07:06:44 PM
The answer to your question of attacking one of the chains seems to be valid, still.

I don't think so...

When a fork is proposed, like XT or Classic (with 75% trigger and a few weeks of grace period between the trigger and the switch to new rules), I think that:

* Before the fork, holders should pray that it resolves neatly and quickly as a non-event, and keep quiet or voice their preferences quietly, so that it does not upset the price;

* If the proposal gains some support, but neither reaches 75% nor drops back to zero, and it looks like the impasse may continue for a while, they may want to speak out for one outcome, to help break the impasse -- but that may make things worse if they themselves cant agree on which side to support.   They may want to sell while the price is still OK, justin case; but that may cause the price to crash.  Or they may choose to bet on the price recovering later, and keep holding.

* If the proposal gets little suport and seems to be a sure fail, the holders shoul shout it down.

* If the proposal gets 51% and keeps increasing, the holders should cheer it along.

* If the proposal gets the required support and triggers, the holders should upgrade their clients accept it, and do what they can to convince the remaining miners and players to accept it too.

* If the change has triggered, but at the end of the grace period there is still a non-negligible fraction of the miners that refuse to accep it, then the holders should try to convince the exchanges and other services to boycott the minority chain and refuse its coins, and convince the miners to sabotage the minority chain.

When a minority can veto, we have what amounts to a game of "chicken". In the game of chicken, the side perceived to be the craziest and most hell-bent on winning at any cost (including their own destruction) is the side that wins.  This right now is the side of the smallblockers, unfortunately.  That's why I think this will take a while to play out, longer in fact than it will take to fill the blocks and hike fees. Possibly long enough to get a network congestion failure. 

There won't be a "congestion failure". If blocks are full a order of importance builds itself, those TXs that are more important are paying more and those that are not important are paying less/nothing. You dont have to agree with this fee market evolving and its perfectly fine to be in the bigblockers-camp, but this "congestion failure" is just bullshit cause it paints a situation that will never occur.

The more important Bitcoins becomes, the more likely a congestion failure will be absent a scaling solution.  Let's assume half the transactions are either not important or urgent. Then what happens if that number grows by a factor of five? This is not unprecedented.  There is no way the price will sustainably go up without attracting new users EXPONENTIALLY and the network won't be able to handle them no matter how much in fees they pay. 

Let's use a hypothetical example: Imagine that the Chinese government announces that they will soon close the loophole that allows their citizens to avoid capital controls via crypto. This could cause a mad rush to the exits, particularly if the economic conditions inside China deteriorate. If one tenth of one percent of the Chinese try to get their money out through bitcoin, that's (1,600,000,000)X(0.001)=1,600,000 so at only one transaction each, we're looking at over four times the total daily network capacity IN ADDITION TO all the other traffic.  That's just one example. I can think of dozens more. Hyperinflation in a third world country. another Cypress type banking crisis.  A terrorist attack on the Bank of International Settlements. SWIFT or ACH getting hacked. etc.

The mempool has already been over 10MB for two days straight. We are looking at a permanent and growing backlog of transactions. 










3301. Post 13632829 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Sitarow on January 21, 2016, 07:43:29 PM
Bitcoin was interesting when it was an experiment, when it ran. It’s crawling now, crawling toward instability.

http://www.coindesk.com/is-bitcoin-for-the-masses-or-against-the-state/

Even the cheap rags are onto us.  Cry

"One could even go so far as to claim the current banking system is more decentralized than bitcoin at this point. The Federal Reserve is composed of 12 banks across the country which then lend money to the nearly 7,000 banks in the country, not to mention the thousands of credit unions as well.

On the other hand, bitcoin (although still in its infancy) is currently managed primarily by four large mining pools, all out of China. While these pools are networks of many individual miners, there is uneasiness about this predisposition."



#1 BTC = Global, not a single country.
#2 BTC = Public Ledger and distributed, Unlike banks that don't even trust one another's books.
#3 BTC and its participants can migrate to a better horizon solution at a moments notice. Unlike bank that don't have a trusted backup that they would ever agree on due to political situations and commitments.

The list goes on. It is unfortunate to see this disingenuous type of approach to sell sensationalism while masquerading as journalistic reporting.

#1 majority hashpower is in China. Chinese mines can be controlled or shut down by the People's Bank or the government.



3302. Post 13632866 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 21, 2016, 07:51:03 PM
The mempool has already been over 10MB for two days straight. We are looking at a permanent and growing backlog of transactions.  

Check http://cointape.com

Tell me those who are waiting, how much they are paying in fees.

To help you with the math: 1 satoshi = $0.0000040927

From what I see, most want to pay <30 satoshi per byte with a lot of transactions being in the <10 satoshi per byte or 0 satoshi.

Most txs right now who are waiting, are paying <0.05$ - with the bulk paying <0.02$

First block inclusion is at 0.08$ right now.

Such Fullblockalypse... Very fees... WOW Roll Eyes



This is just the beginning. In the future, we'll have to throw in fees and HOPE they are high enough for our transactions to be included.  That makes it impossible to build a business model because of the unknown variable.

As a miner, would you rather get a 26BTC reward @$600/BTC or a 35BTC reward @ $200/BTC? This may not be a hypothetical question.



3303. Post 13632967 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 21, 2016, 08:03:22 PM
#1 majority hashpower is in China. Chinese mines can be controlled or shut down by the People's Bank or the government.

If the chinese can produce something domestically, they do.

Why "import" BTCs for dollars, from foreign miners, when they can produce them locally?

If Chinese production of BTCs can satisfy local BTC hunger (prevents USD outflows) or even be used for "export" (USD inflows), then it's a "profitable" activity for their economy.

Having most of the hashpower in one country, particularly one controlled by a totalitarian government, is almost as bad as having most of the hashpower in one pool.  What if the Commies decide that Bitcoin is a threat to their own new digital currency that they are looking into creating?  Protectionism isn't exactly unknown to them.



3304. Post 13633133 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: ImI on January 21, 2016, 08:15:49 PM

The more important Bitcoins becomes, the more likely a congestion failure will be absent a scaling solution.  Let's assume half the transactions are either not important or urgent. Then what happens if that number grows by a factor of five? This is not unprecedented.  There is no way the price will sustainably go up without attracting new users EXPONENTIALLY and the network won't be able to handle them no matter how much in fees they pay. 

Let's use a hypothetical example: Imagine that the Chinese government announces that they will soon close the loophole that allows their citizens to avoid capital controls via crypto. This could cause a mad rush to the exits, particularly if the economic conditions inside China deteriorate. If one tenth of one percent of the Chinese try to get their money out through bitcoin, that's (1,600,000,000)X(0.001)=1,600,000 so at only one transaction each, we're looking at over four times the total daily network capacity IN ADDITION TO all the other traffic.  That's just one example. I can think of dozens more. Hyperinflation in a third world country. another Cypress type banking crisis.  A terrorist attack on the Bank of International Settlements. SWIFT or ACH getting hacked. etc.

The mempool has already been over 10MB for two days straight. We are looking at a permanent and growing backlog of transactions. 

that doesn't contradict my point. you are right if a big flush of TXs comes their will be a BIG mempool and essentially alot of TXs would have to switch to another coin. nevertheless its not a "congestion" as this basically paints a picture where NO TXs AT ALL will be processed ands thats bullshit.

if you have 1.6Mio TXs and only 200.000 are fitting on the blockchain then a market will occur and the most important 200.000 will be processed. i know you can argue that that would be not a good situation for Bitcoin OK, but its not that the newtwork stops processing TXs.

i hope it gets clearer now.


Those people switching to another coin may never switch back.



3305. Post 13633295 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Sitarow on January 21, 2016, 08:25:34 PM


I think you may be trolling Smiley however for those that may be reading your reply then please indulge further.

#1 The "hashpower" is migratory and can move in less time than it takes for you to wire funds to your

The physical bitcoin mines cannot be moved easily.  The ChiComs can nationalize them, merge the pools and double spend until we fork away from them. Then they can point at the new fork and do it again. Only forking away from SHA256 can stop them.  You can imagine the damage that will do.



3306. Post 13633380 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 21, 2016, 08:36:40 PM
#1 majority hashpower is in China. Chinese mines can be controlled or shut down by the People's Bank or the government.

If the chinese can produce something domestically, they do.

Why "import" BTCs for dollars, from foreign miners, when they can produce them locally?

If Chinese production of BTCs can satisfy local BTC hunger (prevents USD outflows) or even be used for "export" (USD inflows), then it's a "profitable" activity for their economy.

Having most of the hashpower in one country, particularly one controlled by a totalitarian government, is almost as bad as having most of the hashpower in one pool.  What if the Commies decide that Bitcoin is a threat to their own new digital currency that they are looking into creating?  Protectionism isn't exactly unknown to them.

China is intentionally low profile in terms of international "incidents". They don't want to draw too much negative attention.

Even if the western elite hate bitcoin with a passion, they will (hypocritically) crucify the chinese for such an attempt. They'll make it top news that "China is panicking and is now after Bitcoin and bitcoiners". The chinese have learned the western modus operandi, they aren't idiots. They have an attitude of "maintain a low profile and steady as she goes" particularly for things related to things which aren't exclusively domestic and/or have international reach. I feel the western elite tried to exploit them with the hearn article, by putting them on the spotlight, presenting them as some kind of "problem" so that they can then try to mitigate this "perception" and thus make them react like "we are not the problem, we'll increase blocksize" to preserve their low profile. Thus they were "played" to start getting out and supporting the "Classic" in order to ...prove that "we aren't the problem, we are easy-going miners, we only want peace and stability, all these stuff that were written about us are false"...

The western elite like to play chess and play everyone like a pawn... what is the chinese miner attribute? Low profile, we don't want any problems, we do what we do and don't really bother with anyone... so with a little bit of upsetting the status quo after the Hearn article => they are placed into the spotlight as a "problem" => this activates their instict to go back to low profile and say "yeah yeah 2mb it is, just leave us alone so we can go back to low profile mode where nobody notices us". However by doing that they are shooting themselves on the foot since forking bitcoin is destructive both for them and bitcoin.

No, what we are witnessing is the Tragedy of the Commons. Chinese Miners know that the first one to defect will face considerable resistance and likely loss of profits, so they all wait for someone more brave or for Core to miraculously pull their heads out of their collective ass.  Even if they know we need a scaling solution toot sweet, they will keep on keeping on at ramming speed toward that brick wall and grab as much $$ as they can before the big crash. These are not risk-taking heroes like us early adopters. They are conformists who were taught their whole lives not to make waves.  This will end badly.



3307. Post 13633477 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 21, 2016, 08:32:21 PM

Laws and contracts are useless if there is no third party with power to enforce them and settle disputes. 



That's not entirely true.  Two parties may resolve a dispute themselves. IF they believe that it is less costly than a physical confrontation.  Anarcho-capitalists also theorize that third party mediators will offer their services in dispute resolution based on commonly-accepted community norms. If Both parties can agree on a third party Dispute Resolution Organization, then they would also have to agree on mechanisms for enforcing the outcome.

War is expensive. Throughout history, you will find that it is mostly engaged in by parties that do not bear the full cost. We propose that any parties engaging in physical conflict bear the full cost of doing so, thereby discouraging the practice. 

Reputation also has an economic and social value. Credit scores are one example.  Other members of the community can enforce laws and contracts even if they are not a direct party by imposing opportunity costs on violators. An example: you defaulted on a loan, so most others will refuse to lend to you in the future, and if they do it will be at a much higher interest rate.  or another: You punch somebody in the nose and word gets out so you are no longer welcome at certain social events.




3308. Post 13633546 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Sitarow on January 21, 2016, 08:57:22 PM


I think you may be trolling Smiley however for those that may be reading your reply then please indulge further.

#1 The "hashpower" is migratory and can move in less time than it takes for you to wire funds to your

The physical bitcoin mines cannot be moved easily.  The ChiComs can nationalize them, merge the pools and double spend until we fork away from them. Then they can point at the new fork and do it again. Only forking away from SHA256 can stop them.  You can imagine the damage that will do.

Physical bitcoin mines tend to shutdown due to obsolete hardware when new technology goes online. Most recently the new ASIC chips 0.06J/GH vs the best bitmain has to offer that was recently sold at 0.25J/GH or the older hardware of 0.55J/GH.

What I was making reference to is that people who point hardware at the pools can point them to other pools rather simply. Many have backup pools pre-programmed for any downtime the primary target pool has.

That doesn't matter. If the Chicoms want to shut us down now, they can.  It is completely irrelevant how much their electricity costs because they won't be mining for profit. They will be using stolen gear to double spend and they only need to do that for a short while to destroy the market's faith in our currency. As long as they have enough asics in China to create a megapool, they can double spend and keep double spending until we fork away from SHA256 or until 51% hashpower goes online outside of China.



3309. Post 13633827 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 21, 2016, 09:20:02 PM


While democracy does not directly account for intensity of desire, it has some indirect ways. For example, if the majority chooses laws that are too unfair to some minority, the latter may resort to crime to make ends meet, or to terrorism and other anti-social behavior, in spite of the penal deterrents against such acts.  Then the majority, if it is not too stupid, will usually ease the plight of that minority, enough to keep those reactions down to a tolerable level.

Huh What planet are you living on? In practice, the opposite more often occurs.  The majority who thinks they are morally right will not focus on the injustice suffered by the minority. They will focus on the crimes committed in reaction to that injustice.  Look at how every militant group in the U.S. from the Black Panthers to the KKK are treated.

A voter pays no immediate direct penalty for an uninformed vote. There is not sufficient incentive to become informed. To know this, all you have to do is look at election results throughout history. Why spend hours researching the relevant policy options and politicians when the chance of the election being decided by your one vote is infinitesimal? Voting is more useful for signaling your allegiance to a group.

Recognition of Natural Rights is enshrined in the U.S. Declaration of Independence. This may not be the case for other countries, but here it was used as a justification by the Founding Fathers to rebel against Mother England. If Natural Rights have no legitimacy, then our government is a criminal organization with no legitimacy either.

AngloSaxon law is based on two main concepts:
1. Common law that predates government that did not create it but recognizes it and enforces it.
2. The principle that "Governments derive their just power from the consent of the governed." This concept dates all the way back to 1215 when King John signed the Magna Carta.

Anarcho-capitalists do not want rulers, but that does not at all mean we don't want rules. In fact, we are the only group that consistently can apply Rule of Law because the alternative is a violence monopoly (central government) that creates, selectively interprets and enforces the very Rules that limit its power. That is Rule of Man, not Rule of Law.

Democracy is BY DEFINITION the domination of the minority by the majority. Politics is merely the art of convincing enough people to agree with you so that you can FORCIBLY impose your will on those who don't.





3310. Post 13634044 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: CuntChocula on January 21, 2016, 09:52:18 PM
...
Recognition of Natural Rights is enshrined in the U.S. Declaration of Independence. This may not be the case for other countries, but here it was used as a justification by the Founding Fathers to rebel against Mother England. If Natural Rights have no legitimacy, then our government is a criminal organization with no legitimacy either. ...

  Rats eat cheese.
  Billy Jo eats cheese.
∴Billy Jo is a rat and a criminal, Q.E.D.

Quote
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends (securing Natural Rights), it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it  ~U.S. Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776




3311. Post 13634084 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: BitUsher on January 21, 2016, 10:04:23 PM

Shouldn't you be out fixing the roads or something?   Huh

We pay people with heavy machinery to do that all without coercion and taxes. People like you pay a lot of money to vacation here as well so don't paint my community as some backwards anarchy-primitivist community where we have to build the roads with manual labor.

Assume for the record that Bitcoin Classic is a coup d'etat, Assume that it is a Trojan Horse for BIP 101...
Isn't that better than having to deal and negotiate with the likes of Peter Todd and LukeJR?

Hey guys, let's just change the POW for Lulz! They might be technologically intelligent, but they have no common sense, no ability to compromise, and no ability to consider economical rampifications of their decisions. The interview With Guy Corem is particularly illuminating. Bitcoin is for cryptopunks/cypherpunks and not for anyone else.

I like Peter Todd and LukeJR, as well as many of the developers and supporters of bitcoin classic. Yes, if Bitcoin loses its  cryptopunks/cypherpunks principles than it loses my support. This doesn't mean it cannot go mainstream , merely that we don't need a very inefficient paypal 2.0 that has democratic mob rule deciding on the features. May as well use fiat or Goldman sacks coin if bitcoin becomes to centralized and compromised. 

How does "democratic mob rule" make Bitcoin MORE centralized? That's not really an accurate term, anyway. Bitcoin is market ruled and if it doesn't fulfill the needs and desires of the market, the market will replace it. You can still use it if you want to. MySpace is still online too.



3312. Post 13634292 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: CuntChocula on January 21, 2016, 10:27:02 PM
...
Recognition of Natural Rights is enshrined in the U.S. Declaration of Independence. This may not be the case for other countries, but here it was used as a justification by the Founding Fathers to rebel against Mother England. If Natural Rights have no legitimacy, then our government is a criminal organization with no legitimacy either. ...

  Rats eat cheese.
  Billy Jo eats cheese.
∴Billy Jo is a rat and a criminal, Q.E.D.

Quote
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends (securing Natural Rights), it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it  ~U.S. Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776

Billy Joe, if I believe, as a bunch of angsty aristocrats our Founding Fathers did, that Man is God's creation, and it is not, indeed, the case, am I "a criminal [...] with no legitimacy"?

And do you understand what context is, or bombastic, overblown bullshit impassioned oratory?
"I been sayin' that shit for years. And if you ever heard it, it meant your ass. I never gave much thought what it meant. I just thought it was some cold-blooded shit to say to a motherfucker before I popped a cap in his ass.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

Jefferson intentionally used the word "Creator" and not "God" because he was a Deist as was Thomas Paine.
You don't have to believe in God to have Natural Rights. We all have those rights because of our humanity regardless of how we acquired that humanity. Regardless, the overt stated claim of the Founding Fathers was that Governments exist for the purpose of securing rights that predated government, Rights that exist independent of the State. According to the Founders, governments do not grant Natural Rights. They either recognize them and secure them or they fail to do so and have no just power.  This is based on Enlightenment philosophy articulated by John Locke, only Lock used the word "property" and not "happiness". 

Look, I'm not going to prove Natural Rights exist with words. I do it with actions, as did the Founding Fathers. We hold those rights to be "self-evident", meaning we are not going to ask anyone to respect them. We will demand that they be respected by what we do.  If we make no such demands, then by default we consent to the government we have. It's not an "ought" argument. It's an "is" argument. You don't have to like it just like you don't have to like the Law of Gravity, but ignore it at your peril.



3313. Post 13634417 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: poncho32 on January 21, 2016, 10:31:30 PM

In the case where a country is at war the government can commander any private property it wants, and there's nothing the owner can do to stop it. The government can commandeer your house, your car, or the iron railings outside your house to make shells out of. The government decides whether you still own something when it's at war, and will use force to take it off you if you resist.

Yes and a gunman can demand "either your money or your life", but that doesn't make the action morally legitimate or make you immoral for claiming that you don't have any money even if you do. You will resists if you wish or submit if you don't want to, but the right to resist is yours whether you exercise it or not. Paradoxically, most highwaymen understand this better than governments do. At least they don't usually claim moral sanction of their actions. Exercising your right may cost you your life, but some choose to die free rather than living unfree. That's actually common. Animals in captivity often live longer than animals in the wild. It's a quality of life issue, and the freedom many of us enjoy today is a result of others choosing quality over quantity of life.

People who don't love freedom don't really understand those of us who do. They don't get why we risked so much to create the Bitcoin market in the first place.  It shouldn't work, according to them. But it does and it will, even if it is co-opted by others. We have the protocol, and we can build it again if this instance fails. You can't disinvent a technology. Once it's out there, it's out there forever.



 




3314. Post 13634621 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote
1. If TFF thought that there are "unalienable rights" and indeed there are none, this misunderstanding would not make them "a criminal organization with no legitimacy." Simply means they were dead wrong.
  1a. No suggestion of "unalienable rights" existing outside of TFF's belief in the aforementioned.  If you hold Natural Rights to be self-evident, and they turn out to be so much bullshit, this would make you neither a liar nor a criminal.

If they weren't criminals, then we could possibly overthrow our government and not be criminals. If you are suggesting Might makes Right and they are not criminals only by virtue of winning, you have the bulk of Western Philosophy against you.


Quote
2. Their "unalienable rights" are not your "Natural Rights," different shit.

Wrong. They are exactly the same rights I am talking about.

Quote
3. There's bullshit said because it sounds purty, and makes people feel righteous and good about doing ugly shit. It's just bullshit people say, don't take it seriously. Niggers had no "unalienable rights," neither did bitches. That all changed over 2 & a half centuries. Obama ain't George Washington.
Go figure.

It's about consistency. One can error by saying something inconsistent with what they do or say two things inconsistent with each other.  Someone can be consistent and be wrong, but they can't be inconsistent and be right. Square circles don't exist. If the State claim it's just power to rule comes from the consent of the governed, then it cannot use that power to violate that consent.  It simply can't. It can use other power, coercive power, but in doing so it is no longer just and by it's own reasoning loses it's right to govern, even if it doesn't yet lose the ability.

Words mean things. You implicitly acknowledge this or you wouldn't be writing here. There's no argument you can make with words to prove me wrong, because the mere attempt is implicitly admitting that I am right.






3315. Post 13634715 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Smallblockers don't seem to get it. The only way you can prove me wrong about Bitcoin is by making me rich. If the market goes down, it's because it rejects the smallblocker vision. Miners are more likely to take the big block fork. If it goes up, I can sell my coins at a nice profit so I can re-invest in a coin more true to what I believe Bitcoin is supposed to be.

so what's it going to be? Checkmate.



3316. Post 13635219 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: CuntChocula on January 22, 2016, 12:02:04 AM

If you're suggesting that the state claims that it rules with universal consent of *all* that it governs, you're simply mistaken.

I believe the State claims to rule with the overwhelming consent of most of the governed, and it does. According to them, if you vote and your candidate loses, you still consent to be governed by the winner because in voting you implicitly consent to the rules of the game. They also claim that if you don't vote, you implicitly consent to be ruled by whoever wins because you didn't voice your objection. It's a nice little trap.


Quote
And you're gullible enough to hold the current administration to the letter of some agitprop penned 2 & half centuries ago.

I do hold them to it because that's where they claim to get their legitimacy.  It's by their own stated standards that they lack that legitimacy.  It's why I feel no moral obligation to respect their rule. Having said that, I do not advocate breaking the law for the same reason I don't advocate trying to fight off an armed gang of attackers with a butter knife. It's not a moral issue. It's just a matter of pragmatism, but that doesn't mean I have to pretend it's right or stop looking for an opportunity to escape the situation or to find a way to fight back that has a reasonable probability of success.  

Anyway, the original point was that "anarchy" technically means "no rulers" not "no rules", but definitions are descriptive, not prescriptive, so what it technically means is useless in common speech, where it means "chaos". That's why I prefer to say I'm an advocate of distributed governance.  People still ask me what that means, but at least they start out knowing nothing about it rather than something that's wrong.



3317. Post 13635564 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 22, 2016, 01:30:19 AM

(1) each individual should be rewarded by society in proportion to what he does for society, rather than by his possestions, descent, titles, intelligence, shrewdness, etc.;  

That's what capitalism does. If you make a profit, it's because you utilized your capital in a way that society a.k.a. the market values.  You get market share by giving customers what they want. You make profits by doing so efficiently.


Quote
(2) property and economical rights of the individual are not absolute but are subordinate to the interests of society as a whole,

according to whom? Who gets to decide? Two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner?


Quote
(3) the state is supposed to provide public services like health care, education, social security, transportation infrastructure, emergency and security services, etc.;

and the State gets the resources to do this how exactly? By running a bake sale? If a private organization takes things involuntarily, it's robbery. Just because the State calls it "taxation" doesn't mean it's any more moral. You can't delegate the the state the right to take things on your behalf if you don't have the individual right to do that in the first place.

Quote
(4) the state should try to ensure equal opportunities to everybody and ensure that everybody has a decent minimal living conditions.

http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html


Quote
part of protecting consumer rights, socialism implies state intervention when needed to keep markets free, by preventing the formation of monopolies and cartels.

Free markets by definition are free from State interference.  Monopolies are only possible with state help. Cartels don't work, witness OPEC. 



3318. Post 13635782 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 22, 2016, 02:26:49 AM


But in that case the laws and contracts are useless, because the dispute will be decided by the expected costs and benefits of each action (e.g., the party with the machine guns gets his way), and not by any laws or contracts.

as opposed to being decided by who has the best political connections or the most expensive lawyers?  


Quote
Today I learned a new name for "government": "Dispute Resolution Organization".  Wink
 
I suppose that the difference is that there will be several DROs that the parties can choose from.  But suppose that they both agree on DRO A when they sign te contract, but when the dispute arises one party asks his buddies from DRO B to persuade the other party, while the latter brings his nuke-launching Abrams tank out of the cellar...  

Those multiple DROs sound very much like big city gangs...

And the police aren't a gang?  I'm not proposing a utopia. Only a system that is less violent than one centered on a violence monopoly funded by theft.



Quote
Quote
War is expensive. Throughout history, you will find that it is mostly engaged in by parties that do not bear the full cost. We propose that any parties engaging in physical conflict bear the full cost of doing so, thereby discouraging the practice.  

That would be wonderful!  But does anyone have any idea on how we can get that rule to apply?

repealing or nullifying the laws that oblige us to pay for wars we don't support would be a good start.

Quote
Quote
Reputation also has an economic and social value. Credit scores are one example.  Other members of the community can enforce laws and contracts even if they are not a direct party by imposing opportunity costs on violators. An example: you defaulted on a loan, so most others will refuse to lend to you in the future, and if they do it will be at a much higher interest rate.  or another: You punch somebody in the nose and word gets out so you are no longer welcome at certain social events.

Well, I think that bitcoin will in the future be a textbook example of (among other things) why loss of reputation is hardly an effective deterrent.  See Josh Garza, Patrick Strateman, Zhou Tong, ...  While a scammer or defaulter may lose a fraction of his market, there will always be whose who take his side.  Why, even Danny "Neo&Bee" Brewster seems to still have friends in the community...

People have gotten lazy by allowing the state to do the due diligence for them and to protect them from bad actors.  I'm sure you know of many many cases where the State has failed to do just that, but it does give us a false sense of security.   Look, I can't tell you how a Stateless society will solve all social problems, because it's not a centrally planned community.  If I could give you all the answers you seek, then I would make a good central planner, but in truth NOBODY can be a good central planner because central planning doesn't work. It's F.A. Hayek's economic calculation problem.

I just know that an institution that is financially dependent on initiating or threatening violence to aquire revenue is in no position to enforce the laws that govern a just society.



3319. Post 13635841 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Dotto on January 22, 2016, 03:04:16 AM
This descending triangle closes in few hours. Dumpage incoming

looks short term oversold to me. beware of the fourth punch: the second bounce.



3320. Post 13635976 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 22, 2016, 03:07:15 AM

Even knowing that one's own vote will not decide the election, a "socially intelligent" person will take the time to vote according to his desires; because democracy has a chance of working if, and only if, everybody does that. 

Only a minority of voters are socially intelligent, and I include you in that group and you know almost nothing about economics. So let's assume half the voters are socially responsible and half vote selfishly in their own special or short term interest. Let's also assume roughly half are smart and half are dumb. You have four voting groups: smart and good, smart and selfish, dumb and good, dumb and selfish.  How do you get a majority of beneficial election outcomes from that? 

Economically, the State is an engine for concentrating benefits and distributing costs. Reformers bear the full cost of reforms on themselves and when they are successful, the benefit is distributed to everybody. The end result is that most reformers go broke before meaningful reforms get implemented, but lobbyists for special interests get rich.  This is the same for every government everywhere. Governments concentrate benefits and distribute costs. it's what they do. it's not a bug, it's a feature.


Quote
My experience is that even the poorly educated people can vote much better than the elites claim.  When democracy fails, it is often because it is not given a fair chance, or not used often enough.  (Here in Brazil the main Executive and Legislative posts are elected, but the Judiciary is totally self-selected and indepednent. As a result, while the first two branches barely work, and are highly corrupt, the latter does not work at all, and is totally corrupt...)

My experience is that even poorly educated people can make good economic decisions much more often than elites such as yourself claim. The problem is that they are faced with perverse incentives such as working less to maintain welfare benefit eligibility.


Quote
Quote
Democracy is BY DEFINITION the domination of the minority by the majority. Politics is merely the art of convincing enough people to agree with you so that you can FORCIBLY impose your will on those who don't.

That is true, but the alternative is, inevitably, domination of the majority by some minority.  Methinks that, by and large, the latter is much worse.

You are locked in the statist paradigm. Maybe power shouldn't be concentrated in the minority OR the majority. Maybe power shouldn't be concentrated.  Such a society would still have poverty, crime, and violence, but it wouldn't be locked into some zero-sum winner-loser one-size-fits-all solution to every problem.  If you want to get out of a hole, the first thing you should do is stop digging. If you want a prosperous peaceful society, perhaps eliminating the wealth-consuming violence monolopoly in the middle of it is a good start.



3321. Post 13636000 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: aztecminer on January 22, 2016, 03:21:28 AM
This descending triangle closes in few hours. Dumpage incoming

looks short term oversold to me. beware of the fourth punch: the second bounce.



did you hear that everyone ?? the four punchmens are raiding.

I don't know that, but it's a real possibility. The spike wasn't as "spikey" as usual, but still very obviously there. I'm just saying be cautious. That's all. 



3322. Post 13636129 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

the order book is looking very lopsided. a bounce could come at any time. Maybe $415 before going back down.



3323. Post 13636308 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

The wall has been breached! REPEAT: THE WALL HAS BEEN BREACHED!



3324. Post 13637031 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 22, 2016, 05:42:17 AM
 Capitalism (as a political term) basically says that whatever you can grab by following the rules of the game, you can keep. In particular, it sees no difference between gains from speculative trading,  monopolistic and abusive pricing, deceitful marketing, exploitation of cheap labor, activities that damage the envirnment or public health, etc.; and the state should not try to hamper such activities.  In Capitalism, poverty and inequality are non-problems.


That's such a bag of wrong, I don't know where to start. Speculation is a legitimate market activity. Good speculators provide liquidity when it is needed and bad speculators pay the good speculators. No one needs to be coerced out of their earnings for this service, unlike government-provided services.

Quote


Quote
Free markets by definition are free from State interference.  Monopolies are only possible with state help. Cartels don't work, witness OPEC.  

That is a serious distortion of the term "free market"  that Libertarians and Anarchists have invented.  Sorry, a free market is totally not a market that is free from regulation and control.  

Basically, it is a market where consumers are free to chose among suppliers, suppliers are free to set their prices as they like, there are no artificial production quotas, and -- most important -- there is no spurious barrier to the entry of new suppliers.  In a free market, theory says that prices will adjust to be the cost of production plus a profit that is about just enough to make that market as profitable as any other activity.  

The opposite of a free market is an oligopoly (including monopoly), where there are few suppliers and new ones are prevented from entry (even if they have the capital and capability to do so).  Then the suppliers can conspire to raise their prices to the level that maximizes their net revenue, which can be much higher than the free market price.

Left to themselves, markets often degenerate into oligopolies or monopolies, because of the same factors that led to concentration of bitcoin mining.  Many countries have antitrust and competition laws to prevent that from happening and keep the markets free.

This is why I said you don't know anything about economics. Monopolies originated as companies granted specifically by the government an exclusive charter to do business in a given area or industry. These were companies like the Hudson Bay Company or the East India company. Modern monopolies are more subtle about how they rely on the State to maintain dominant market share. Microsoft externalizes the costs of patent and trademark enforcement. Others use copyright law to do the same. Still others use regulatory capture.   

Yes, capital-intensive industries give advantages to businesses with more capital. That's why it's called "capitalism",  but that should be the only barrier to entry and it almost never is. Why should poor women need a license to cut hair or do manicures?  It's protectionism by incumbent players to limit competition, although they always claim it's about quality.

Yet in spite of its advantages Microsoft STILL lost market share to apple, android etc because contrary to your claim, the natural tendency for large corporations is to get complacent and too conservative, and therefor less competitive.  Look at the formulaic crap pumped out by major motion picture studios. It's the small independents at Sundance that make all the interesting stuff.

Or take your field: Universities have a near monopoly on post secondary credentialing, but you haven't done anything exiting and new in centuries. Judging by your product (college grads) you are overcharging. Those surveys that test graduates basic knowledge of history or government should be embarrassing to you.  Silicone valley doesn't even give a shit if a prospective employee has a degree. They just want to see what you've made. Your projects are your resume. 



3325. Post 13656490 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

There is absolutely no possibility of forking away from Proof of Work. That is simply too radical of a change to gain any traction. There is a very remote possibility of forking to a different POW algorythm,but that would likely be in the distant future if some advancement in computing power such as quantum computing renders SHA256 obsolete.  It would serve no purpose to do fork in order to get away from mining being concentrated in China. It's cheep electricity that gives them an advantage and that will give them an advantage with any POW scheme.

Similarly, there is no possibility of successfully forking away from the 21 Million BTC cap.Any serious proposal to do that would trigger a catastrophic market dump if it even started to gain any credibility.

The 1 MB cap on block size is a different scenario entirely. Without raising the limit, BTC appreciation is severely limited. There is no way a significant increase in BTC valuation will not attract enough new users to clog the mempool and render the network unreliable.

If I had to guess, I would say the general direction of the market is down until AFTER a successful hard fork to increase capacity. In any case, it's risky to be long, even if you support Bitcoin Classic and you see support growing.  I have a suspicion that the natural differences in opinion, vision and philosophy are being exacerbated by some force hostile to our project and is carrying out a successful rough consensus attack. If that's true, there is no reason to assume that this attack will cease until a competing coin gains a critical mass or market share. 

I don't know what's worse: that somebody found and is exploiting Bitcoin's governance vulnerability or that governance is so bad that development is fracturing on it's own without help. 




3326. Post 13656626 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 24, 2016, 12:38:22 AM
Vitalik just got finished describing SegWit as basically an ugly kludge of code. Doesn't he know about the transaction malleability? Mt. Gox? Kittens??

Yeah, I forgot that Krapeles tried to blame the collapse of MTGox on Tx malleability.  I hope that Japanese prisons are as unpleasant as WWII Japanese prisoner-of-war camps.  It will save some victim of his from the trouble of having to murder him.



3327. Post 13661340 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

If today's daily candle stays green, it will be the first time this year that we have 2 consecutive up days.




3328. Post 13700191 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Who has been holding from $502, $475, $465, and $428? 

When are you gonna sell? at $350? 300? 200?

Price can't go up because transaction volume can't go up. It's that simple, so unless you know about some secret deal between core, nodes and miners to increase capacity, enjoy watching the value of your holdings slowly deteriorate.



3329. Post 13700261 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: r0ach on January 28, 2016, 04:04:14 AM
Who has been holding from $502, $475, $465, and $428? 

When are you gonna sell? at $350? 300? 200?

Price can't go up because transaction volume can't go up. It's that simple, so unless you know about some secret deal between core, nodes and miners to increase capacity, enjoy watching the value of your holdings slowly deteriorate.

Lightning Network isn't priced in at all, so assuming it ever comes out and functions, that will be a huge bump for price even with 1.6MB blocks.

How do you know? Maybe without your vaporware promises, the price would be even lower.



3330. Post 13701397 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 28, 2016, 05:00:42 AM
Who has been holding from $502, $475, $465, and $428? 

When are you gonna sell? at $350? 300? 200?

Price can't go up because transaction volume can't go up. It's that simple, so unless you know about some secret deal between core, nodes and miners to increase capacity, enjoy watching the value of your holdings slowly deteriorate.


You are a fucking jerk when you spin and threaten with your exaggerations.


Grow up. We have a responsibility as bitcoin owners. It's not enough to just hodl. When our network is being managed poorly, we as stakeholders need to speak up and if the core maintainers don't listen, we have to communicate in a way that will get their attention. We have to dump, because if the price doesn't go down, miners have no incentive to help implement a scaling upgrade.

Thank you to everyone who dumped. I'm sorry it was necessary and to be honest more dumping may be necessary because Core seems to have a tin ear.  Even the miners want to upgrade, but they are too terrified of a controversial hard fork. So, we have to give them something worse to be terrified of. Aaalrighty then. We can do that.



3331. Post 13701529 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

So kiddies, let's review:

What are the elements of a four punch raid?

Crash (to $352)? check
Bounce? check
pause? check
Spike (to $428)? check
second bounce (at $371)? check

so what's left? oh, that's right. A gradual loss of all upward momentum leading to the next crash.




3332. Post 13701564 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 28, 2016, 08:22:52 AM

The way to build bitcoin is to work together and to propose various solutions and to attempt to convince in constructive rather than destructive manners....
 

We tried that. Gavin's been trying that for years.  Time to bring out the big guns. I'm sick of arguing with stupid people. I'm just going to take your money and hope you learn the hard way.



3333. Post 13701582 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: barbs on January 28, 2016, 08:31:10 AM
So kiddies, let's review:

What are the elements of a four punch raid?

Crash (to $352)? check
Bounce? check
pause? check
Spike (to $428)? check
second bounce (at $371)? check

so what's left? oh, that's right. A gradual loss of all upward momentum leading to the next crash.



I really don't want to have to strap on my moon suit but i usually trade against whatever sentiment is in this thread.

Now i'll have to buy!

You're welcome to borrow my fiat to buy on margin. I think there's still a little left at ~40% APR.

suckers.



3334. Post 13701860 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: m0gliE on January 28, 2016, 08:52:00 AM
So kiddies, let's review:

What are the elements of a four punch raid?

Crash (to $352)? check
Bounce? check
pause? check
Spike (to $428)? check
second bounce (at $371)? check

so what's left? oh, that's right. A gradual loss of all upward momentum leading to the next crash.



I really don't want to have to strap on my moon suit but i usually trade against whatever sentiment is in this thread.

Now i'll have to buy!

You're welcome to borrow my fiat to buy on margin. I think there's still a little left at ~40% APR.

suckers.

What's the point of the insult? Bitch.

Do I have to fucking spell it out? I'll try to use small words so you morons can understand. I make money no matter which way the market goes because there is ~$25 Million in margin longs on BFX all the time. That jacks the dollar funding rate to 5-10X the BTC lending rate.

The only risk I have to worry about is BFX disappearing with all my money, and traders have that same risk in addition to exchange rate going against them.

It's not a generic insult. It's a specific insult to people who don't know how to trade but worse than that think there isn't anything to know that they don't already know. I can deal with stupid peoiple. I do it all the time every day. What is most unpleasant to deal with is stupid people who don't know they're stupid. Those are the people I really enjoy watching suffer.

It wasn't an accident that I got in in 2011 and you didn't. I'm smarter than you. If you don't agree, keep pumping and prove me wrong. If you can.



3335. Post 13701996 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on January 28, 2016, 09:26:58 AM
I'm smarter than you. If you don't agree, keep pumping and prove me wrong. If you can.


Yeap, that cold storage bag gettin' him a little agitated.  Cheesy

You mean the cold storage I bought @ $10? Yeah, I'm really agitated it's currently worth 3600% more than I paid for it. 

I don't care if I'm the bad guy. Somebody has to be or the story is really boring. If it doesn't scale, my coins are for sale (at the right price, of course).



3336. Post 13702044 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

So who bought the $375 dip? anyone? Somebody did or we wouldn't be going back up. Ok, I admit it was me, but I am not going to hold those coins for more than a $20 bounce and probably not that long. This is a fucking downward ratchet, folks.




3337. Post 13702086 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: cbeast on January 28, 2016, 09:41:16 AM


I don't care if I'm the bad guy. Somebody has to be or the story is really boring. If it doesn't scale, my coins are for sale (at the right price, of course).
Bitcoin will scale. If everyone else gives up on it and the price drops, I will learn how to program and take over as Chief Scientist and raise it from the dead. But I'm betting others will do that before me.

Fine. When it scales, I'm back in. It's not the code. Gavin and Mike already fixed it, but the damn miners won't run it.  That's why we have to crash the market. If the Chinks can't understand Engrish, let's see how they grok poverty.



3338. Post 13702133 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on January 28, 2016, 09:47:02 AM
You mean the cold storage I bought @ $10? Yeah, I'm really agitated it's currently worth 3600% more than I paid for it.  

I don't care if I'm the bad guy. Somebody has to be or the story is really boring. If it doesn't scale, my coins are for sale (at the right price, of course).

Opportunity cost... the frustration is not alien to me, friend.



My little problems are nothing in the grand scheme of things. The real opportunity cost is that we could have disrupted money. MONEY. We could have taken it away from the banksters and given it to the people, but a few elitist fucktards thought that a settlement network would be better. They think the problem isn't the middle men, but that they weren't the middlemen.   oh, yeah. The hate is flowing through me.



3339. Post 13702236 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: r0ach on January 28, 2016, 10:07:25 AM
So kiddies, let's review:

What are the elements of a four punch raid?

Crash (to $352)? check
Bounce? check
pause? check
Spike (to $428)? check
second bounce (at $371)? check

so what's left? oh, that's right. A gradual loss of all upward momentum leading to the next crash.



Price can't go up because the threat of a hard fork.  Even a non-contested fork would cause dump till it's over.

That's true in the short run, but ultimately the code has to be fixed and the longer we wait the more painful it will be. And don't think a SegWit soft fork wouldn't also cause enough uncertainty to effect the price.




3340. Post 13702239 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: barbs on January 28, 2016, 10:15:46 AM
So who bought the $375 dip? anyone? Somebody did or we wouldn't be going back up. Ok, I admit it was me, but I am not going to hold those coins for more than a $20 bounce and probably not that long. This is a fucking downward ratchet, folks.



You are full of shit bro

Watch and learn...Bro

I bought at $375.72 but I only bought with money I earned lending out my fiat at interest, so it's free money and if we don't get a $15 bounce or higher, it's no big deal. 



3341. Post 13702290 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: m0gliE on January 28, 2016, 10:17:34 AM
So kiddies, let's review:

What are the elements of a four punch raid?

Crash (to $352)? check
Bounce? check
pause? check
Spike (to $428)? check
second bounce (at $371)? check

so what's left? oh, that's right. A gradual loss of all upward momentum leading to the next crash.



Price can't go up because the threat of a hard fork.  Even a non-contested fork would cause dump till it's over.

Why? Would it be risky to own btc during hard fork?

unless you keep all your coins on an exchange, you will be able to spend them on BOTH FORKS, effectively doubling your coins. supply and demand being what they are, a doubling of coins means that each coin is worth~half of what it was previously.

The trick is to spend all your coins on the fork that will die and keep them on the one that will prevail. What's nice about that is that not just miners, but holders also get an effective vote on which fork they want.




3342. Post 13704331 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: barbs on January 28, 2016, 01:05:53 PM
I am having trouble holding onto my toupee with the speed of this dead cat bounce

Isn't billyjoeallen supposed to be pumping this with his interest dividends??

I am. why do you think it's at $383? Just be sure to sell as soon as we get back into the $390s. It won't stay there for long.



3343. Post 13704698 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: aztecminer on January 28, 2016, 03:04:24 PM
Who has been holding from $502, $475, $465, and $428? 

When are you gonna sell? at $350? 300? 200?

Price can't go up because transaction volume can't go up. It's that simple, so unless you know about some secret deal between core, nodes and miners to increase capacity, enjoy watching the value of your holdings slowly deteriorate.



sounds about right . the broken part seems to out weigh the halving-ening .. it dont matter how many coins can be mined if bitcoin cant scale.

What's critical is that we're on track to run out of blockspace BEFORE the halving. That's actually good, because it would be a bigger mess if it happened afterward.  A hard fork will be messy even if it's not controversial, but it will be.  There is just no way around it and it's less painful if it happens sooner rather than later. The sad part is we will likely just get a 2MB can kick so we'll have to do it again AFTER the halving anyway.



3344. Post 13704838 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: rdnkjdi on January 28, 2016, 03:13:52 PM
Looks like Bitcoin Classic releases soon.  https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/431us1/anybody_knows_when_classic_is_launching/

Waters seem muddy now on if the hardfork is going to actually happen (seemed imminent a few weeks ago).  Also - if the hardfork is good for bitcoin overall even if you fully believe 2mb blocks are a necessity seems muddier to me now than it did a few weeks ago.  

Expect a bunch of technobabble objections to whatever gets released.  Smallblockers only need ~30% hashpower to effectively veto any upgrade.  A tie is a loss, so this is still very much up in the air. 

A hard fork is absolutely necessary. At some point, we will need to raise or eliminate the 1 MB cap in order for Bitcoin to continue to grow.  It may not grow if another cryptocoin takes top spot, which is an inevitability  with 1MB blocks. Somebody wants that to happen and may be running a rough consensus attack against us now. So if we must have a hard fork, and I believe we do, we need to do it as soon as possible because it will only get messier and harder to do as time passes.



3345. Post 13704902 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: aztecminer on January 28, 2016, 03:17:05 PM
So kiddies, let's review:

What are the elements of a four punch raid?

Crash (to $352)? check
Bounce? check
pause? check
Spike (to $428)? check
second bounce (at $371)? check

so what's left? oh, that's right. A gradual loss of all upward momentum leading to the next crash.




what we waiting on Huh

That's why i used the term "gradual". It takes time for the dumb money to catch on. 



3346. Post 13705421 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on January 28, 2016, 04:20:52 PM
this idea of voting for how bitcoin evolves is insane.... bitcoin's biggest problem is we don't have a legit leader replacement for satoshi..... we need a galvanizing visionary that can lead devs and the community alike.

Will the real satoshi please stand up.

This is the free market, Dude. We vote with our wallets. Be the leader you want.



3347. Post 13705503 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: barbs on January 28, 2016, 04:29:54 PM
Should have bought Facebook stock instead of bitcoins

Because of the historic enmity between Zuckerberg and the Winklevi, I consider MZ prime suspect in the rough consensus attack. He has the means, motive and opportunity to pull it off. If he is the culprit, Bitcoin Classic is going to face an uphill battle.




3348. Post 13705991 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: Richy_T on January 28, 2016, 05:05:33 PM
Should have bought Facebook stock instead of bitcoins

Because of the historic enmity between Zuckerberg and the Winklevi, I consider MZ prime suspect in the rough consensus attack. He has the means, motive and opportunity to pull it off. If he is the culprit, Bitcoin Classic is going to face an uphill battle.



Nah, he's too busy monetizing your personal data and swimming through huge piles of cash Scrooge McDuck style.

Personal data that can be used to orchestrate a PsyOps campaign.  I'm not saying I know he's guilty. I'm not even saying for sure there is an ongoing rough consensus attack.  I'm just saying as an econogeek, that incentives have enormous explanatory power.



3349. Post 13706255 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 28, 2016, 05:46:17 PM
So kiddies, let's review:

What are the elements of a four punch raid?

Crash (to $352)? check
Bounce? check
pause? check
Spike (to $428)? check
second bounce (at $371)? check

so what's left? oh, that's right. A gradual loss of all upward momentum leading to the next crash.



I really don't want to have to strap on my moon suit but i usually trade against whatever sentiment is in this thread.

Now i'll have to buy!

You're welcome to borrow my fiat to buy on margin. I think there's still a little left at ~40% APR.

suckers.

What's the point of the insult? Bitch.

Do I have to fucking spell it out? I'll try to use small words so you morons can understand. I make money no matter which way the market goes because there is ~$25 Million in margin longs on BFX all the time. That jacks the dollar funding rate to 5-10X the BTC lending rate.

The only risk I have to worry about is BFX disappearing with all my money, and traders have that same risk in addition to exchange rate going against them.

It's not a generic insult. It's a specific insult to people who don't know how to trade but worse than that think there isn't anything to know that they don't already know. I can deal with stupid peoiple. I do it all the time every day. What is most unpleasant to deal with is stupid people who don't know they're stupid. Those are the people I really enjoy watching suffer.

It wasn't an accident that I got in in 2011 and you didn't. I'm smarter than you. If you don't agree, keep pumping and prove me wrong. If you can.





You are wrong all the time, especially recently since you have been preaching to sell since about $250.

Of course you have come around a few times to admit upward momentum, but you have been denying upward momentum since about $250. Helrow?

Liar! I have been saying that there shouldn't be upward momentum, but I never denied that there was.  I am constantly overestimating my fellow bitcoiner's intelligence. Momentum is largely calculated by watching the moving averages. I am not a master trader. That's why I mostly lend out my coins and fiat rather than trading them.  I am learning. What I am not doing, is risking more than I can afford to lose. I am not risking any margin calls. I am not blindly trusting that the blocksize issue will go away or be resolved easily by good-hearted people who have unselfish motives and wisdom.  I am not an idiot. I am not you.



3350. Post 13707036 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on January 28, 2016, 07:18:43 PM

He totally reminds of the guy that played Biff in Back to the Future. "What are you looking at, butthead?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-t2PDrqPCc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WC_uaDhSlME



3351. Post 13707561 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 28, 2016, 08:20:17 PM
fucking cheap coin if you ask me, and billy being bearish is a pretty darn good indicator, we're going up.

Actually I predicted a return to the low $390s before resuming the crash, so we'll probably go straight down instead.



3352. Post 13707777 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 28, 2016, 08:47:01 PM
Buy BUY BUYY!!!!!!!!!

we are going to the MOOON

Perhaps you are not considering the tens of thousands of pyramid schemers who still hold coin and are just now wrapping their heads around the concepts of "unscalability", "hard forks,", "consensus determined," "fee market", etc.  You don't have to be a genius stock trader to know that it's a pretty strong "sell" signal when the Board of Directors get into a fist fight.



3353. Post 13707836 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 28, 2016, 09:03:22 PM
Buy BUY BUYY!!!!!!!!!

we are going to the MOOON

Perhaps you are not considering the tens of thousands of pyramid schemers who still hold coin and are just now wrapping their heads around the concepts of "unscalability", "hard forks,", "consensus determined," "fee market", etc.  You don't have to be a genius stock trader to know that it's a pretty strong "sell" signal when the Board of Directors get into a fist fight.

there was a fist fight? who won?


They're still fighting.



3354. Post 13708103 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: BlackSpidy on January 28, 2016, 09:38:02 PM
OK, so I'm not really up to date with the block size thing. So, I'm just sitting on my ass, hodling waiting for this to blow over and the pre-halving FOMO kicks in...

FOMO? Fun of Maxing Out capacity?



3355. Post 13708112 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 28, 2016, 09:47:04 PM
in truth its good to see new dev teams with there own impl. of bitcoin, with BIP 9 it will make it easyer for devs to agree on miner changes and move forward.

all is good, and everyone is like the sky is falling the sky is falling, it's a hell of a show!


"miner changes" heh. Good one.



3356. Post 13708187 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 28, 2016, 08:56:57 PM
let me say it again


 less than 380, NEVER AGAIN.



Still stand by that call?  I think there is a one hundred and eleventeen percent chance that you are wrong.  I will bet my last satoshi on it.



3357. Post 13708235 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: mogrith on January 28, 2016, 10:10:30 PM
let me say it again


 less than 380, NEVER AGAIN.



Still stand by that call?  I think there is a one hundred and eleventeen percent chance that you are wrong.  I will bet my last satoshi on it.

But only the last one, none of the others. so not a big loss :-)

No matter. It's $379.98 on BFX already.Stamp and BTC-e curiously not following yet.



3358. Post 13708464 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 28, 2016, 10:35:32 PM
let me say it again


 less than 380, NEVER AGAIN.



I feel like maybe you haven't been paying attention to the fact that the community has been tearing itself to pieces like a mental patient on bath salts?

everyone can see as clear as day there is some power struggle with bitcoin dev. and the solution to block limit is hard to see.
i'm not / no one is denying that
the speculations that bitcoin is about to fork as a result, and the dire consequences that ensue,  are largely exaggerated.
so what, the big picture looks gr8, segwit is a huge improvement, MUCH better solution then simply upping the limit.
and to me the fact that "the community has been tearing itself to pieces like a mental patient on bath salts." is just fucking bullish...

yep, and I know who my money is on in this game ... it will be the cypherpunks and cryptogeeks who built this thing and truly understand its subtle nuances and well-balanced incentive structures rather the CoinBase brian armstrong's R3 Hearn's and sundry govt toady boot-licker johnny-come-latelys who want a new PayPal for Big Bruh data-harvesting and black-listing.

the cypherpunks have more tricks up their sleeves in regards to hard forking POW, sybill attacks than you have half heard about ... if these wiener VCs and guvcorpro-bully boyz want a fork intrigue over this they better show up well prepared ... it's not about the money, it's about sending a message, choose your team wisely.

It's you who want to turn Bitcoin into PayPal by pushing users off the main chain and out onto settlement layers. You're the people that want to have the centralized power in the system. You think we don't understand the delicate balance of features at play, but you are sadly mistaken.  If Bitcoin can't survive a hard fork, then it wasn't worth investing in in the first place.  I think it will survive and thrive but one way or another, we're gonna find out because it damn sure won't survive being run by a bunch of ideological codemonkeys without the business sense to run a lemonade stand.

I got into this game because I'm a hard core anarcho-capitalist, but I'm not going to pretend to know that I know what's better for the customer than the customer. The Market is God and always always has the last word.



3359. Post 13708495 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on January 28, 2016, 10:47:57 PM
let me say it again


 less than 380, NEVER AGAIN.



Still stand by that call?  I think there is a one hundred and eleventeen percent chance that you are wrong.  I will bet my last satoshi on it.


There you go... not making sense, again....  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Huh?  He was right, though? went to 379 briefly about 10 mins later....

Now Stamp is under as well. My last satoshi is safe.



3360. Post 13710961 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: CuntChocula on January 29, 2016, 05:54:46 AM


do you want it?

Assburgers?!

I LOLed. A real double bottom in technical analysis means support holds on HIGHER volume, which is not what happened.  We may have a significant bounce from here, but it's likely not the end of the bear



3361. Post 13711054 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Shorts and longs are both increasing on BFX. Great for me as I'm getting close to 40% APR on my margin funding. Looks like we're in for some volatility. 



3362. Post 13728563 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

I was a little worried that there was a inverted head-and-shoulders pattern on the 2 HR chart, but it obviously failed to complete. I'd actually be surprised if there isn't a LOT of hidden overhead resistance at ~$384 or the top of the 4HR moving average trading band. Of course bulls are so weak (or sneaky) that it hasn't even been tested except once two days ago when it failed.

All in all, I'm pretty comfortable sitting in cash. The Four Punch raid was successful and we will soon likely resume our regularly scheduled dumpage.



3363. Post 13729142 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Innovation is not burning a gigawatt of mining power to process less than 4 transactions per second.  Especially when we could increase that capacity by a factor of eight with almost no additional costs.

In economics, sometimes it's helpful to try and calculate the true cost of something by factoring out the subsidies. In this case the subsidy is the block reward and the cost is paid by investors/speculators.

if users actually paid the full cost of their transaction now, it would be several dollars each. That's a horribly inefficient system and not one worth investing in, IMHO.  The fact that it could potentially be much more efficient if some minor changes were made is irrelevant if there is no process for making those changes.

The governance model needs to change, so until Bitcoin Classic or something like it achieves a clear majority of support by nodes and miners, we have to assume the rough consensus mechanism of a small minority having effective veto power is going to continue, which means nothing is going to get done. Blocks will fill up. Fees will increase. There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure. 



3364. Post 13729322 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on January 31, 2016, 02:21:22 AM
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure. 

Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc?

Don't tell me what I need. It's that kind of arrogance that is going to make Bitcoin an asterisk in the history of cryptocurrencies. Businesses that dictate to their customers what they should want are gonna have a bad time.



3365. Post 13735630 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: edgar on January 31, 2016, 04:32:34 AM
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure. 

Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc?

Don't tell me what I need. It's that kind of arrogance that is going to make Bitcoin an asterisk in the history of cryptocurrencies. Businesses that dictate to their customers what they should want are gonna have a bad time.

says the man killing 'ants' with sledgehammers & uzis, day in day out

Says the only man making money on this sideways action.



3366. Post 13736955 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

I don't know about y'all, but I can sleep comfortably knowing that the value of my assets depends on the sophisticated economic and technical knowledge of third world pyramid schemers.  Tongue



3367. Post 13737154 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 31, 2016, 09:43:23 PM
I don't know about y'all, but I can sleep comfortably knowing that the value of my assets depends on the sophisticated economic and technical knowledge of third world pyramid schemers.  Tongue

... the slippery pig rider goes all in on hillybilly bucks.

Certain people are ignorant of the topology of the Louisiana swamp. There are no hills. Not even little ones.



3368. Post 13738500 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 31, 2016, 10:44:01 PM
I don't know about y'all, but I can sleep comfortably knowing that the value of my assets depends on the sophisticated economic and technical knowledge of third world pyramid schemers.  Tongue



What a bunch of simplistic FUD...


You are sounding a bit desperate in your conclusory remarks - when a large majority of this thread's readers will see right through such a remark to realize that bitcoin has way more facets beyond chinese speculation... or whatever other purported "third worlders" to whom you are referring

How ya like me now, Bitch. Wanna try for $354? 

If you sold higher, you could have bought and increased your stash. Opportunities are lost on morons.



3369. Post 13738505 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: ImI on February 01, 2016, 12:27:54 AM

this bitcoin coldwar is heating up and may soon escalate with all dirty tricks including ddos, hacks and mass media interviews etc

i suggest 50% bitcoin /  50% altcoins as hedge

I don't think you really understand what a hedge is. How about 50% keno cards? Less risk.



3370. Post 13738702 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: TReano on February 01, 2016, 03:00:24 AM
Bitcoin still looks super heavy.

Sometimes it takes a while for dreams to die.



3371. Post 13746340 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

You've been Four Punch Raided, boys and girls.



3372. Post 13746647 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 01, 2016, 08:57:38 PM
You've been Four Punch Raided, boys and girls.



that wasn't that great of a raid.. i call do overs.

okey dokey. Next crash coming up.



3373. Post 13748421 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: pleaseexplainagain on February 02, 2016, 12:25:47 AM
You've been Four Punch Raided, boys and girls.

Google turns up four results for "four punch raid". Wanna ELI5?

as i understand it,  it is adapted from boxing.
essentially anyone that wants to make something stop or change direction or punish etc hits the target in a planned and very heavy way and it usually is very effective at getting the outcome they want. just as in boxing if you hit your opponent with 4 consecutive punches in a matter of seconds you will have them in real trouble.

Very good. Go to the head of the class.



3374. Post 13748432 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: jbreher on February 02, 2016, 01:15:55 AM
You've been Four Punch Raided, boys and girls.

Google turns up four results for "four punch raid". Wanna ELI5?

Just something that Billy came up with
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=956051.0

Germane part from the link - it was something BJA noticed as a repeated atomic meta-move:

1) crash/bounce
2) stutter step
3) spike/short squeeze
4) second bounce at much higher level

If I know what a 'stutter step' was, I might be able to make use of this knowledge -- should it be a real thing.

an example is the sideways action (up then down) just after the crash to $352



3375. Post 13748607 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

I think there's too many shorts to go straight down from here. We might have to go up enough to trigger some stop-losses on short positions before the next big wave down.



3376. Post 13758535 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

I'm the king of sideways. Makin' mo $$$$$$$$$.

Margin funding interest rate is down a bit and that concerns me, but we are close to a 4 hr Moving average crossover, and there might be a short term pump. I just don't wanna play anymore. Not with ~20% APR guaranteed.

Everything everything is so damn risky. Even if there is a consensus on larger blocks, there will prolly be a spike before I even find out about it. I'll have to get in on the retracement. So what? I'm not counting coins anymore. I'm just looking for ROI.

Price will likely double or more with 2MB blocks so what are the damn miners waiting for?  Is basic economic literacy really so rare?





3377. Post 13759024 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

The logarithmic uptrend is broken on the five year chart.  If you wanna zoom out, zoom out motherfucker. It's the scalability problem.  It's gotta get a lot worse before it gets better (IF it gets better) because some people are so stupid, they require an extreme amount of pain before they learn anything. 

You're not trading efficiency for censorship resistance. Majority mining power is concentrated in one country with a totalitarian government. The People's Bank of China has a million man army behind them and they could take over our network with a few phone calls.  The only reason Bitcoins functions is because the ChiComs LET it function. That  battle has already been lost. So smallblockers want to keep bitcoin from scaling for NO REASON!

So we're going down or sideways.  If we go up, new users are attracted, blocks fill up, transactions slow down and get expensive,  then we have to go down or face a network congestion failure. 

They got us. The bad guys won. Subsidized electricity and consensus governance brought us down. Meanwhile a bunch of other cryptocurrencies are waiting in the wings to claim the prize we fucking threw away. 




3378. Post 13767338 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 03, 2016, 02:28:58 PM
I'm the king of sideways. Makin' mo $$$$$$$$$.

Margin funding interest rate is down a bit and that concerns me, but we are close to a 4 hr Moving average crossover, and there might be a short term pump. I just don't wanna play anymore. Not with ~20% APR guaranteed.

Everything everything is so damn risky. Even if there is a consensus on larger blocks, there will prolly be a spike before I even find out about it. I'll have to get in on the retracement. So what? I'm not counting coins anymore. I'm just looking for ROI.

Price will likely double or more with 2MB blocks so what are the damn miners waiting for?  Is basic economic literacy really so rare?





u shouldnt keep all your money in fiat.. you really should consider buying pms. an economic reset with a revaluation of gold to much higher prices would solve a lot of the central bank problems instantly ... bitcoin does not have that same ability that i am aware.

There's no way of really knowing what would happen in a SHTF scenario. It's past the singularity. PMs will always have some sort of value, but it may be lower than today's. No, what you need is flexibility to adapt to a situation that could radically change lightning quick. For that, nothing beats cash- the most liquid asset. 

People are using the money they save on lower fuel prices to de-leverage, which means that we actually have some disinflation as the fractional reserve money multiplier runs in reverse.  We're near the zero bound on interest rates. Things will have to get substantially worse before the FED and USGov start outright printing money.   



3379. Post 13773432 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

4 HR moving average crossover. Here comes the bump.



3380. Post 13773986 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 04, 2016, 01:20:18 PM
4 HR moving average crossover. Here comes the bump.

Called it. Purely a technical spike.



3381. Post 13775767 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: 8up on February 04, 2016, 02:43:43 PM
Are you ready to say good bye to the $3xx range?  Grin


Not ready for the $200 range just yet. Lots of volatility first.



3382. Post 13776542 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: gizmoh on February 04, 2016, 06:31:15 PM

The Curious Case of Gregory Maxwell & The Lightning Network

https://news.bitcoin.com/the-curious-case-of-gregory-maxwell-and-the-lightning-network/



The routing problem is further complicated because they don't only want to route transactions. They want to take a slice and collect a fee for doing so. This is a fee that will come directly out of the pockets of miners and will make Bitcoin less secure.

Blockstream hobbles bitcoin, gives it a crutch and then tries to take credit that it can walk. If Core loses their position as reference client developers, they should try a career in government.



3383. Post 13776761 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 04, 2016, 07:02:14 PM

The Curious Case of Gregory Maxwell & The Lightning Network

https://news.bitcoin.com/the-curious-case-of-gregory-maxwell-and-the-lightning-network/



The routing problem is further complicated because they don't only want to route transactions. They want to take a slice and collect a fee for doing so. This is a fee that will come directly out of the pockets of miners and will make Bitcoin less secure.

Blockstream hobbles bitcoin, gives it a crutch and then tries to take credit that it can walk. If Core loses their position as reference client developers, they should try a career in government.

Greg would make a pretty good banker. Why not give it a try??

That is exactly what he is trying to be and exactly the sort of person Bitcoin was designed to bypass.



3384. Post 13776927 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 04, 2016, 07:14:03 PM

The Curious Case of Gregory Maxwell & The Lightning Network

https://news.bitcoin.com/the-curious-case-of-gregory-maxwell-and-the-lightning-network/



The routing problem is further complicated because they don't only want to route transactions. They want to take a slice and collect a fee for doing so. This is a fee that will come directly out of the pockets of miners and will make Bitcoin less secure.

Blockstream hobbles bitcoin, gives it a crutch and then tries to take credit that it can walk. If Core loses their position as reference client developers, they should try a career in government.

Greg would make a pretty good banker. Why not give it a try??

hearn beat him to it.

I wouldn't even know who Mike Hearn is if Core were doing their damn jobs. Blockstream is using an anti-spam kludge as an economic tool. They were never authorized by the owners (holders) or the employees (miners) to do so. They infect the network so they can sell us the cure. Mike Hearn wanted to bypass Core because Core IS the problem.  This is the free market equivalent of regulatory capture. Well, it won't work. Either the market embraces Blockstream and gives me an opportunity to cash out at a nice profit, or it rejects smallblocks and crashes, incentivizing the miners to adopt a real scaling solution.  I'm good either way, so what's it gonna be?



3385. Post 13784110 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

It will be interesting to see if we can hold the 5% gain through Golden Week when Chinese banks will be shut down for nine days.  If bears want to force a long squeeze, this may be a good time.

If anyone wants to search back in the thread to about a week ago when I predicted a bounce to the "low $390s", go ahead. It's scary how accurate I have been lately. I'm expecting to get a huge colossal  miss any time now.




3386. Post 13786126 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: sniveling on February 05, 2016, 02:18:47 PM
It will be interesting to see if we can hold the 5% gain through Golden Week when Chinese banks will be shut down for nine days.  If bears want to force a long squeeze, this may be a good time.

Are you sure they shut their banks for a whole nine days? They are open for a few days between Christmas and New year. The longest Western bank closure is normally no more than four-ish days. I know their New Year is their biggest holiday, but nine days of closed banks seems excessive.

Five business days and two weekends.



3387. Post 13786934 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Starting to look very double toppy.



3388. Post 13789888 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 05, 2016, 07:15:20 PM
Starting to look very double toppy.

Called it. Again.

maybe I should start charging for my insightful analysis.



3389. Post 13789939 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Using the 1MB limit to prevent centralization is like mangling your daughter's face to prevent her from being raped. It's an extremely high price to pay and it doesn't even work that well.



3390. Post 13790021 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: danielW on February 06, 2016, 02:10:55 AM
Using the 1MB limit to prevent centralization is like mangling your daughter's face to prevent her from being raped. It's an extremely high price to pay and it doesn't even work that well.

Its a tradeoff thats not necessary right now. Scaling roadmap is far better plan.

When blocksize increase is needed it will be done.

Gavin backed by coinbase and blockchain alliance are pushing inferior plan to remove the cyptherpunk element of bitcoin development.

It's a stalling roadmap and it was created by people who's skill set is programming and cryptography, not business and economics. 



3391. Post 13790165 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: danielW on February 06, 2016, 02:40:36 AM
Using the 1MB limit to prevent centralization is like mangling your daughter's face to prevent her from being raped. It's an extremely high price to pay and it doesn't even work that well.

Its a tradeoff thats not necessary right now. Scaling roadmap is far better plan.

When blocksize increase is needed it will be done.

Gavin backed by coinbase and blockchain alliance are pushing inferior plan to remove the cyptherpunk element of bitcoin development.

It's a stalling roadmap and it was created by people who's skill set is programming and cryptography, not business and economics.  

Stalling roadmap? Stalling of what? block size increase? Ofcourse it is and thats good. Block size should only be increased when needed. We should try and 'stall' for as long as possible. It trades off decentralisation.

Block size should only be increased when needed.

There has been some incompetent economics coming out of Peter R and the classic camp. G Maxwell seems to have a much better understanding of economics.

Actually when it comes to economic understanding and crypto, I consider Nick Szabo as a thought leader. He is ofcourse very much against classic coup.

The maxblocksize limit of 1MB was designed as an anti-spam tool, not an anti-decentralization tool.  Larger capacity is needed and it's needed now if we want to have transactions processed in a reliably timely manner for a predictable price, which any sane network administrator should want.  No, you smallblockers want to change the economics of Bitcoin. It's you who want to change the "cythpherpunk" ethos by routing small transactions off the main chain and taking the fees with them, which will take money out of the hands of miners and make Bitcoin less secure. You want to break bitcoin so Blockstream can collect service fees for getting around the limit.  Lightning network doesn't even have a proposed method for decentralizing the routing of LN transactions, which means it may even make them MORE centralized.

Who are you to claim the right to decide when more capacity is needed?  No minority should have that power.  What the fuck kind of elitist ethos is that?



3392. Post 13790241 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

The facts:
If half a million people wanted to send a single bitcoin to another address the same day, THEY COULD NOT ALL DO IT, NO MATTER HOW HIGH A FEE THEY PAID.

People know this and so we do not buy bitcoin. This is why the price is falling. Price will continue to fall or stagnate until capacity is raised.



3393. Post 13790345 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: danielW on February 06, 2016, 03:26:51 AM
The facts:
If half a million people wanted to send a single bitcoin to another address the same day, THEY COULD NOT ALL DO IT, NO MATTER HOW HIGH A FEE THEY PAID.

People know this and so we do not buy bitcoin. This is why the price is falling. Price will continue to fall or stagnate until capacity is raised.


Facts:

1. Bitcoin functions perfectly with current limit. There is no urgent issue that is not FUD. It is a wholly manufactured non-existant FUD crisis. To say network is clogging,  is FUD propaganda.  I can send bitcoins all the time with no problems.
Agreed, given current hobby status.

2. The crash landing FUD propaganda predicted by Mike Hearn has not happened, despite FUD being spread months back that by December (or latest Jan) the network would break down.
Agreed, given current hobby status.

3. There is No reason to increase the block size limit now. To say otherwise exposes you for the complete ... Therefore, any FUD about need to increase to 2MB is laid bare as completely propaganda
 
Agreed, given current hobby status.

Thats why the best way going forward is to increase TPS via-segwit short term (superior to hardfork increase) and payment-channels, hard-fork, lightining, other methods long term.

No need for this contentious chaotic hard fork attempt that is really power grab in disguise, and trades off decentralisation.  

That's quite a non sequitur. Maxwell is the one attempting a power grab.  The clear supermajority wants to increase blocksize. Core is making this badly needed upgrade contentious and chaotic.  We simply don't trust them to do the right thing. They are acting according to their own interest and not the best interest of the network. 

I think Bitcoin will not, cannot grow until the governance model is changed. There is a clear conflict of interest with the core developers and Blockstream. 



3394. Post 13790406 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: danielW on February 06, 2016, 03:48:38 AM
 


Maxwell is the one attempting a power grab
FUD

badly needed upgrade
FUD

are acting according to their own interest and not the best interest of the network.
 FUD

is a clear conflict of interest with the core developers and Blockstream.
FUD



If we ignore personalities, and focus on pure technical solutions. Segwit is far superior to 1mb hardfork increase. Thats all as far as facts.


Calling my argument "FUD" is not a counter-argument. Why is my charge of conflict of interest FUD? Do you even understand the charge? Blockstream's business model does not work without a fee market, but creating a fee market now, before a critical mass of users are formed, will prevent the growth that is necessary for such a fee market to economically function. If that's FUD, tell me why it's FUD.



3395. Post 13790417 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: valta4065 on February 06, 2016, 03:48:02 AM
The facts:
If half a million people wanted to send a single bitcoin to another address the same day, THEY COULD NOT ALL DO IT, NO MATTER HOW HIGH A FEE THEY PAID.

People know this and so we do not buy bitcoin. This is why the price is falling. Price will continue to fall or stagnate until capacity is raised.

What? I was not aware the scaling problem was so high!

Why are most people saying that everything is fine and that scaling will come then? It's really not going to help bitcoin adoption! Especially considering how many transaction are made everyday that are "automatic transactions" like faucets or games that are added to the human exchanges.

Most people are not saying everything is fine. The people who are saying that either want to sell before the price crashes again or are attempting to prevent or stall scaling.  They are a minority.



3396. Post 13790552 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: danielW on February 06, 2016, 04:01:53 AM
1) devs had these ideas before they started their business to promote their vision not other way round.

are you saying they were aware of the scaling problem years ago and did nothing to prevent it? That would explain why segwit is still not ready.

Quote
2) devs have many bitcoin so its in their interest for it to have best possible outcome for bitcoin

No, they do not. They have admitted as much. That is why they need another way to profit from their involvement with Bitcoin.

Quote
3) devs have history of providing open source and free work and being motivated by problems, ideas not money,

The same can be said of Gavin and Mike. and Jeff Garzik.

Quote
4) accusations of conflict of interest can be made at anybody like Gavin, Hearn, coinbase etc. The accusations are made selectively only against core devs who have different ideas to you.

Gavin did not need to take over core development. He was the only person with commit access and lead developer until he gave it to others. It is ludicrous to accuse him of attempting to steal something he already gave away. The same cannot be said for Maxwell and the Blockstreamers.

Quote
5) Most devs, and people opposing classic have nothing to do with blockstream.

If you are developing a product, you obviously don't want someone using a competing product, and so most core devs would obviously oppose that, but that is not the same as saying most core devs oppose a blocksize increase. That is simply untrue. Many core devs want an increase, but enough oppose it that, according to Wladimir's idea of "consensus" (which he apparently thinks means "near unanimity"), the smallblockers have effectively veto power.





3397. Post 13794184 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: Master_dandosha on February 06, 2016, 11:49:54 AM
No crash the price is swinging right now hope by tomorrow reach 410 $
good luck

uh, no. after every Four Punch Raid, there is a gradual dissipation of all upward momentum before the next crash. This has happened at least five times now.



3398. Post 13801955 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: yefi on February 07, 2016, 07:53:35 AM
The guy tried his best to help fix a problem and was treated as shit for it.

Maybe he should have tried harder to write some actual code.


Who wrote most of the code for Facebook or Microsoft or Apple or Google or anybody? We don't know because it doesn't matter. Satoshi Nakamoto is responsible for the economics of Bitcoin. He got the incentives right, which is the whole ballgame.

We're being held hostage by some narcissistic codemonkeys who think we should defer to their economic expertise and business acumen when they have demonstrated no particular expertise or even competence in those areas. They write code. They are good at it. don't mean shit.

The market always has the last word. incentives matter. 




3399. Post 13808176 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

You can't win, smallblockers. It doesn't matter who you DDoS or what other dirty tricks you pull, when the market tanks, the miners will switch to big block code.



3400. Post 13810313 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on February 07, 2016, 10:25:21 PM
You can't win, smallblockers. It doesn't matter who you DDoS or what other dirty tricks you pull, when the market tanks, the miners will switch to big block code.

...or to a more FUD-resistant coin. Mission accomplished.

as long as it's another SHA-256 coin. It's all those ASICs can mine.



3401. Post 13811326 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 08, 2016, 05:41:59 AM
You can't win, smallblockers. It doesn't matter who you DDoS or what other dirty tricks you pull, when the market tanks, the miners will switch to big block code.

Only losers like you and big-blockheads harbour delusions of win-lose zero sum games, your ego needs it. The market could care less. All this for a measly 1MB blocksize raise, are you nutz?

in the free market, it's not zero sum. A trade is always win-win or it doesn't happen. For example, you cripplecoiners can't see any price appreciation without making me a nice profit as I cash out. if p rice stays down or goes even lower, I'll hold because it means the market is rejecting your "ethos" and the miners are more likely to reject your broke dick code.



3402. Post 13862694 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

OK miner cowards, if you don't like Bitcoin Classic, how about a good old fashioned crash?  I think you'll find overhead resistance to a pump may be rather more than you are expecting.



3403. Post 13863101 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

By committing to working with Core, the miners lost all negotiating power with Blockstream. Now cripplecoiners can stall and stall and wait for their beloved fee market to materialize. 

Money for fees comes directly out of money for coins.  We going down, boys and girls.  If I can't persuade you with words, maybe a hit to your net worth will be more convincing.



3404. Post 13863116 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 12, 2016, 05:58:05 PM
OK miner cowards, if you don't like Bitcoin Classic, how about a good old fashioned crash?  I think you'll find overhead resistance to a pump may be rather more than you are expecting.

I am ready to buy your discounted coins. Thank You, and happy to oblige your refund. Please tell us when and how much you are shorting as well.... or is this merely another bluff  Wink

40 coin short with a base price of $381.67.  If it goes up from here, I'll double it. If it keeps going up, I'll double it again.




3405. Post 13863263 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: podyx on February 12, 2016, 06:14:13 PM
By committing to working with Core, the miners lost all negotiating power with Blockstream. Now cripplecoiners can stall and stall and wait for their beloved fee market to materialize.  

Money for fees comes directly out of money for coins.  We going down, boys and girls.  If I can't persuade you with words, maybe a hit to your net worth will be more convincing.

I thought the blockchain size would be increased though? Wasn't it consensus on that?

I've been away for a bit as I've been busy with other things so haven't really followed everything.

Smallblockers want to eliminate small transactions (ostensibly to keep the chain uncluttered) by artificially increasing the price of them. Why they don't just lop off a few digits of divisibility I don't know.  SegWit may be a good idea, but it wasn't designed to increase capacity, but rather to fix the transaction maleability problem.  In either case, Core has admitted that it won't be implemented until the network is clogged up and I suspect it may not even be rolled out then. 




3406. Post 13863340 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 12, 2016, 06:30:23 PM

Thank you kind sir, my wallet is ready and transferring funds as we speak..

You do realize that you're just effectively buying coins that I bought for $10 back in 2011, right? I keep the vast majority of my coins off exchange to minimize risk. I'm not selling coins I don't have and I'm selling them at >3000% markup, so deposit all you want.



3407. Post 13863528 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 12, 2016, 06:50:40 PM

Thank you kind sir, my wallet is ready and transferring funds as we speak..

You do realize that you're just effectively buying coins that I bought for $10 back in 2011, right? I keep the vast majority of my coins off exchange to minimize risk. I'm not selling coins I don't have and I'm selling them at >3000% markup, so deposit all you want.

I'm not attacking your investment strategies and sincerely wish you well. I am just thanking you for creating a small temporary discount before the next bubble. Thank you!

http://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2016/02/12/chinas-role-in-bitcoin-how-cultural-differences-are-affecting-the-technologys-progress

The Chinese miners are aligned with core, Italy and other countries facing fiat crisis, halving approaching.... you are a brave man , and I appreciate it!  Smiley

I'm well aware of the Chinese cultural deference to authority. With so much Bitcoin activity in China now, it makes it far less attractive as an investment.  

Core is the Central Committee of decentralization, dependent on giant miners centralized in one totalitarian state to maintain their hegemony.  if it just goes up from here, good luck. Take the ball and run with it. I'll take my 3000% profits and look for another coin to play with.



3408. Post 13863696 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 12, 2016, 07:07:29 PM

I'm well aware of the Chinese cultural deference to authority. With so much Bitcoin activity in China now, it make it far less attractive as an investment.  

Which is what makes the statements from some Classic supporters so ridiculous, they first want to replace 45 developers from many backgrounds and many different companies with 5 devs from 2-3 companies, than when that fails they threaten to sell their BTC for ETH which is controlled completely by 1 dev ... all because they "distrust authority."  Perhaps the reality has nothing to do with decentralization of development (There always has been multiple implementations with different dev teams) , but a fixation of growing fast and ignoring all concerns along the way.

That's not true at all. We want developers who care what their customers want. It's as goddamn simple as that. We want people who are competent enough to respond to the people who buy coins and keep this whole thing going.

If the other hodlers are ok with an intentionally inefficient network, then that's their call. I am tired of arguing.



3409. Post 13863863 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

UPDATE: I now have a 80 coin short in. Want to make it 160? 320? keep pumping, cripplecoiners.



3410. Post 13864258 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: criptix on February 12, 2016, 08:21:33 PM
UPDATE: I now have a 80 coin short in. Want to make it 160? 320? keep pumping, cripplecoiners.

i see the price approaching 0$ - wtf did you do  Roll Eyes

give it time. We have all weekend for people to catch on.



3411. Post 13865572 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: Tzupy on February 12, 2016, 10:08:14 PM
UPDATE: I now have a 80 coin short in. Want to make it 160? 320? keep pumping, cripplecoiners.

Wow... you are braver bear than me... I shorted 2 days ago, when 12h MACD divergence looked ready to cross into red,
and then had to close the short at a small loss, so now I'm waiting, it may crash this weekend or climb to 400$ and then crash.
Anyway IMO support at 300$ must be tested, even in a bullish scenario.

I agree. I'm only at 108 coins so far.  Hope I can get it a little higher before I continue the dump.



3412. Post 13867473 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: dropt on February 13, 2016, 04:34:16 AM
UPDATE: I now have a 80 coin short in. Want to make it 160? 320? keep pumping, cripplecoiners.

Just dump all of them?  how many you have 600?  more than 1000?  I doubt that you have more than 1000 with your crazy and historical bluffing talk... you sound too desperate, emotional, wrong and whimsical to be able to manage that many coins over a 4 to 5 year period.

that would be great if you could dump, dump, dump in your little fantasy playing all that you like, and in your FUD spreading attempts.



How many can he have when in his world "dump" means "sold 28 coins"?

YEAH, I'M GOING TO TAKE THIS MARKET DOWN WITH MY DUMPS.  ALL 45 COINS, YOU FEEEEEL THAT MARKET?

It's a 150 coin short now. Tomorrow it mat be substantially bigger.



3413. Post 13868069 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 13, 2016, 05:10:58 AM
UPDATE: I now have a 80 coin short in. Want to make it 160? 320? keep pumping, cripplecoiners.

Just dump all of them?  how many you have 600?  more than 1000?  I doubt that you have more than 1000 with your crazy and historical bluffing talk... you sound too desperate, emotional, wrong and whimsical to be able to manage that many coins over a 4 to 5 year period.

that would be great if you could dump, dump, dump in your little fantasy playing all that you like, and in your FUD spreading attempts.



How many can he have when in his world "dump" means "sold 28 coins"?

YEAH, I'M GOING TO TAKE THIS MARKET DOWN WITH MY DUMPS.  ALL 45 COINS, YOU FEEEEEL THAT MARKET?



He seems to have quite a bit of emotional outburst posts, drama and attempts at attention mongering through his nearly 5 year forum history, and there appears to be quite a bit of big talk in various threads which, if he had bet the way he was proposing, he would have lost a whole hell-a-va lot of coins and/or dollars, so we gotta take a lot of BullyJA's assertions with a large grain of salt.. maybe one of those salt blocks that cows lick?   


BJA also seems to describe himself as being smart (or smarter than others) because he identified bitcoin in 2011 and began to participate in bitcoin in 2011, which it is very ironic to be attributing smarts to possible luck and/or coincidence rather than some kind of specific repeatable skill - because merely knowing about something and acting on it, without further details, hardly in itself makes a person smarter than others.

To me, BJA comes off a little bit as having traits of a pathological liar, but it could be just a matter of his various embellishments and his frequent times admitting that he is exaggerating for effects (after he's been called out)... In any event, he may have started out with some version of the truth and some things that actually happened, but then little by little he tweaks the facts and then develops a considerable fictional story around the whole scenario that he has painted himself into describe his circumstances, and may have some difficulties coming clean because he has invested so much into his various embellishments..

What the fuck, Dude? How the hell am I a pathological liar? If anything, I'm overly candid. I read this article once on how it's basically impossible to communicate with someone who is three standards of deviation lower than you on an IQ test. That's what this has to be. You're too damn stupid to even understand how I think, so you project.



3414. Post 13872929 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: dropt on February 13, 2016, 08:15:20 AM

Shit, we're down 21 cents. BJA must have finally pulled the trigger and dumped the rest of his stash.

not a chance. Gotta save it for the second peak of the double top.



3415. Post 13872951 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Dotto on February 13, 2016, 02:21:26 PM
monero pump is getting serious...

+47% in 24h
+183% in 72h

and keep pushing. Finally it´s working

Well, yeah. Everybody is giving up on Bitcoin because now we know the miner cowards will not challenge Core even when their customers demand it. 



3416. Post 13873216 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 13, 2016, 05:04:13 PM
monero pump is getting serious...

+47% in 24h
+183% in 72h

and keep pushing. Finally it´s working

Well, yeah. Everybody is giving up on Bitcoin because now we know the miner cowards will not challenge Core even when their customers demand it.  

I love the false posturing of people threatening to buy Monero or Ether. This only is a valid threat if a real crisis is ongoing instead of a manufactured one. Any investment in these alts is a large gamble that people are free to make. The rest of us are focused on trying to improve bitcoin for the longterm success and not some sort term patch with strings attached.

We tried a long term fix but you smallblockers killed it. Now you are criticizing us for trying to do what we can? FUCK YOU!  It's not false posturing. SOMEBODY is buying Monero.



3417. Post 13873355 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Andre# on February 13, 2016, 08:36:54 AM
-snip-
...the fact that Classic is DOA with the mining and economic majority opposing them. Cheers friend.  Smiley
-snip-

You read the letter as a resounding denunciation of Classic and a firm endorsement of Core, interesting.

Upon reading point 3...
Quote
In the next 3 weeks, we need the Bitcoin Core developers to work with us and clarify the roadmap with respect to a future hard-fork which includes an increase of the block size.

This is obviously asking Core to do what they have refused to do for a year now, and it gives a deadline.

Let's see if miners will grab the bone they might be thrown. My guess is that it will be a pinky promise for a HF sometime in 2017.

Now, because Core is immune to politics, and will only base decisions on their enabling of future profitability technical superiority... they simply cannot do this. To change Gregory's roadmap is to succumb to political pressure where a mouth breathing majority tramples the sacred rights of the enlightened minority, compromising at all would mean they have been lying all along about that point. Bit of a pickle there. Cheers Friend.  Kiss

Let the purge begin! Bitcoin is a settlement tool for central banking, excelsior!


I'm surprised how few people actually understand the letter from a Chinese cultural perspective. Clearly, they give Core a deadline in a face saving way. Superficially, the letter looks like support to Core, while embedded, there's a diktat to include a HF in their roadmap with a deadline of three weeks.

But what if Core doesn't understand it either? I will be happy to be wrong, but I gather the arrogance and hubris of Core will not allow them to respond to this collective bargaining by the employees. The resolve of this labor union has yet to be tested anyway.



3418. Post 13875963 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: inca on February 13, 2016, 08:39:27 PM
Bitcoin now has a rather nice flag formation after the rise from 200-500 with little media fanfare. The alt's are waking up and the halving is approaching. The only thing keeping bitcoin back is the blocksize debate which will soon resolve either by a HF with majority of miner support, or with Core acquiescing to the demands of the market and miners (3 weeks!) and fixing a 2mb blocksize HF in the roadmap.

It isn't hard to see a perfect storm for bitcoin during times of further turbulence in the major markets, where negative rates are being introduced in Western economies as central bankers start to lose control. Previously there has been a hunt for return and yield with QE and cheap money post 2008 being used by banks to bid up stock markets and levitate asset prices. ZIRP has turned everyone into a speculator with cash offering negative returns and the markets looking crash prone now bitcoin may start to look mighty attractive as an asset class in the coming months with it's unique monetary properties.



How many times have we heard this before. "Oh, Bitcoin's fix is just around the corner. It's already in the works. It's just as if it has already happened."

Time after time we think it's over only to turn around and find out we haven't gotten ANYWHERE. XT, Classic, Core Roadmap.... 

All that has happened is that some miners sent a letter to Core saying they don't want any trouble, they just want a time frame on the hard fork. Why would Core listen to them any more than us?  Core knows that these guys will avoid a contentious hard fork like the plague and so they can be ignored with impunity. 

Core guys say "fuck you" to Gavin, Mike, Jeff, Coinbase, Bitpay, Bitstamp, The Winklevi, us, etc but they are supposed to just cave immediately to some Chinese miners who have more to lose in a fight than anybody else?  Does core have a history of being responsive to stakeholder concerns?

Dream on. It ain't fixed until it's fixed.  Until then, holding is risky, selling is prudent and buying is just plain naive.



3419. Post 13876175 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Laosai on February 13, 2016, 11:02:48 PM
Bitcoin now has a rather nice flag formation after the rise from 200-500 with little media fanfare. The alt's are waking up and the halving is approaching. The only thing keeping bitcoin back is the blocksize debate which will soon resolve either by a HF with majority of miner support, or with Core acquiescing to the demands of the market and miners (3 weeks!) and fixing a 2mb blocksize HF in the roadmap.

It isn't hard to see a perfect storm for bitcoin during times of further turbulence in the major markets, where negative rates are being introduced in Western economies as central bankers start to lose control. Previously there has been a hunt for return and yield with QE and cheap money post 2008 being used by banks to bid up stock markets and levitate asset prices. ZIRP has turned everyone into a speculator with cash offering negative returns and the markets looking crash prone now bitcoin may start to look mighty attractive as an asset class in the coming months with it's unique monetary properties.



How many times have we heard this before. "Oh, Bitcoin's fix is just around the corner. It's already in the works. It's just as if it has already happened."

Time after time we think it's over only to turn around and find out we haven't gotten ANYWHERE. XT, Classic, Core Roadmap.... 

All that has happened is that some miners sent a letter to Core saying they don't want any trouble, they just want a time frame on the hard fork. Why would Core listen to them any more than us?  Core knows that these guys will avoid a contentious hard fork like the plague and so they can be ignored with impunity. 

Core guys say "fuck you" to Gavin, Mike, Jeff, Coinbase, Bitpay, Bitstamp, The Winklevi, us, etc but they are supposed to just cave immediately to some Chinese miners who have more to lose in a fight than anybody else?  Does core have a history of being responsive to stakeholder concerns?

Dream on. It ain't fixed until it's fixed.  Until then, holding is risky, selling is prudent and buying is just plain naive.

You're maybe a bit pessimistic. Whatever core or classic, one of them will become the fix.

How do you know that? What makes this time different than the last half dozen times?  If I was Maxwell, I'd ink some response to the miners assuring them that they have been heard and that a hard fork will be rolled out just as soon as it is "needed". I'd basically just repeat the same bullshit I'd already said a million times, but in different words. If my goal was to stall as long as possible, I'd let the full three weeks run out and at the last minute, say that a hard fork will be added to the road map in a time range of between three and 18 months, depending on network traffic. That buys them a year and a half before they have to do anything at all.

You can't nail him down on anything because then you can prove he's lying. He'll make vague promises while reassuring us that there's plenty of time.   



3420. Post 13876746 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

We're already seeing blocks fill up on this pump. I'm curious as to how a rally can be sustained when confirmation times take hours.



3421. Post 13877067 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 14, 2016, 01:18:25 AM
Bitcoin now has a rather nice flag formation after the rise from 200-500 with little media fanfare. The alt's are waking up and the halving is approaching. The only thing keeping bitcoin back is the blocksize debate which will soon resolve either by a HF with majority of miner support, or with Core acquiescing to the demands of the market and miners (3 weeks!) and fixing a 2mb blocksize HF in the roadmap.

The Chinese will stick with Core, they are quite conservative with respect to leadership. I'd be surprised to see Core implement 2MB blocks in addition to segregated witness, but we'll see.

And so long, farewell, auf wiedersehen 300s!
I'm actually pleasantly surprised with the steady price increase recently. Does anyone know the reasoning behind the increase? Does it have anything to do with the lack of users moving to classic or something, and now that the investors see that, they're buying again?

Or has Classic caused the increase as more users flock to it?

i think thats the reason. miners are hesitant and so a contentious HF is for the moment highly unlikely. 95% HF in 2017 is therefore highly likely.


@ImI:  Why do you keep framing the issue as if a hard fork is inevitable?  Why is a hardfork needed in the first place?  I think that threatening and even engaging in action to employ a hard fork is what causes so much contentious behavior from a large number of persons who become more entrenched in their positions because the solution is framed as being a hardfork.

There seems to be no reason for a hardfork, except one that strives to fundamentally change bitcoin's currently existing consensus based governance mechanism. 

ANY blocksize increase will require a hard fork, Numbnuts. The issue at hand is whether or not a contentious hard fork will be necessitated by Core dragging their heels.  The consensus-based governance mechanism is broken.  Maxwell and crew do not know business or economics. The problem with most people who do not know economics is not that they are ignorant, but that they believe in economic models that are incorrect.  It's not like physics. Economics is counterintuitive and people with the least amount of bias and a lack of intellectual rigor almost always get it wrong.  Smart people are often the worst offenders because they assume competence in one field automatically translates into the economics field, but it doesn't.

There is no such thing as a free lunch. The closest we can get is improved efficiency, and Core is intentionally making Bitcoin less efficient because reasons.  There is a cost associated with this.  If you pay higher fees OR you pay by waiting longer, that cost is taken out of price. That's why the 5 year logarithmic uptrend is broken.  This matters much more than some lame $30 pump. That is transient.



3422. Post 13877345 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 14, 2016, 01:33:39 AM
We're already seeing blocks fill up on this pump. I'm curious as to how a rally can be sustained when confirmation times take hours.


Yeah, right, whatever.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


The last six months regarding the average block size look pretty stable to me, with a slightly upward trend in the chart.. and that upward trend in the approximately 60% capacity arena potentially could be nearly completely resolved by seg wit.

https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=180days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

After seg wit goes into effect, then we can assess the situation and regroup... ..

In other words, transactions etc seem to be going pretty well on the technical side of bitcoin, and maybe some of the public is coming to realize that there are really not any technical problems in bitcoin, and accordingly, if you keep doubling down in selling your supposedly existing coins based on these upward BTC price movements, we may be relieved of you from bitcoin and your baloney posts very, very soon.    Cry Cry 

However, I understand when you a guy is dealing with fictitious coins, he really doesn't ever run out of coins.


On the other hand, if you do happen to have some coins, and you really are selling them as you claim, then I can imagine you sticking around the forum, after you have run out of coins and while BTC prices go past $450 and then $600 and then $800 and further into the $2k to $5k price arena, and then you will continue to participate to attempt to talk down BTC prices in order that you would be able to get back in at a lower price than your sell prices in the $200s to $400s.  And, when prices drop from $3800 to $1800, you will stick out your tongue and proclaim that you were right all along. blah blah blah.

I remember, not that long ago, you were supposedly selling considerable amounts of BTC while the prices were below $280 and arguing that BTC prices were going down?  but that strategy did not go too well, right?


Ponzi schemers were responsible for the pump. I didn't anticipate that.  Yeah, I got a lot of coins because I started buying them when they were six bucks.  That's why the chart that concerns me most is the big picture chart. The five year logarithmic chart that went from an uptrend to sideways.  These small fluctuations are just noise, but something clearly has gone wrong with the macroscopic trajectory.   



3423. Post 13877718 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 14, 2016, 03:57:51 AM


"on the cusp"?

We're on the cusp of Deez Nuts.  We ain't on the cusp of shit except fullblockalypse.



3424. Post 13878468 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: bitebits on February 14, 2016, 07:10:27 AM
We're already seeing blocks fill up on this pump. I'm curious as to how a rally can be sustained when confirmation times take hours.

Wouldn't that increase the intensity of the pump? Getting fiat to the exchanges to buy bitcoins is slow because of the antique clearing houses, but at least it is constant delay. Bitcoins sent to the exchanges on price rices are mostly meant to be sold. Having this delayed would only increase the pump right?

Whales who determine the bitcoin price will just increase their transaction fee to whatever price to be in the next block, so I don't think full blocks really have an effect to either direction of the price.

If you had varying water pressure at your house, where one day you had a torrent and the next day a trickle, would that make you want to buy stock in the water company?



3425. Post 13880037 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

400 held!!!!! That means I don't have to close my short...yet.

Actually watching a wall on the wall observer thread. Whoooda thunk it?

The catch is that the was was invisible. Heluva thing watching bulls batter it over and over without making a dent.

Apparently the market had the opposite reaction that I had to the miner letter. Optimists, I guess.
I don't think it means something until it means something.




3426. Post 13880415 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 14, 2016, 11:30:21 AM
400 held!!!!! That means I don't have to close my short...yet.

Actually watching a wall on the wall observer thread. Whoooda thunk it?

The catch is that the was was invisible. Heluva thing watching bulls batter it over and over without making a dent.

Apparently the market had the opposite reaction that I had to the miner letter. Optimists, I guess.
I don't think it means something until it means something.




It's not over yet.  Gosh, we just broke over $400 for a few minutes, and you are calling the end of $400, already?   Strange.


Maybe you are right, but it seems fairly likely that we will be going into the $400s, maybe approaching $420 within a few days.  I would place it at decent odds, rather than attempting to call it for sure one way or another at this point.

I am not calling it. Just observing the action.   Obviously I was very wrong putting in a short in the low $380s.  or maybe just early.  we'll see.



3427. Post 13882095 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Fuck me.  It's hard to imagine a worse call.  Well, the market has spoken and the market always gets the last word.



3428. Post 13882505 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: bad trader on February 14, 2016, 03:50:32 PM
So.. the Chinese New Year is over on Monday and the rumor is the Chinese will start buying like mad when they return from their vacation.

Does that mean we will pump until Monday and then dump?

That's fairly critical resistance that was just broken. The rule is: once breached, resistance becomes support.


It's likely we'll keep pumping until the blocks fill up, then we'll see a correction of some sort, and then the pump will continue until either the market clues in that Core has no intention of increasing blocksize or even rolling out SegWit until after the halving.  Then comes the dump.

Three weeks until the deadline, so I thought we'd chill until then, but I was wrong. Very very expensively wrong.





3429. Post 13882536 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Laosai on February 14, 2016, 03:53:15 PM
Fuck me.  It's hard to imagine a worse call.  Well, the market has spoken and the market always gets the last word.

Depends if you can hold your shorting. Price is going to fold further. It's impossible to hold the 400 forever.

You probably weren't around in 2013.  They said it was impossible to hold $100 too.



3430. Post 13886900 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 14, 2016, 08:27:17 PM
Fuck me.  It's hard to imagine a worse call.  Well, the market has spoken and the market always gets the last word.


I'm glad that you are willing to admit your bad call;  however, I always assert that we can really never know for sure the shortest term price direction unless we happen to be a whale that is able to push it with 10k or more coins  (and/or equivalent in dollars maybe on bitstamp?).

On the other hand, BTC prices had been lingering for so long in the upper $300s after the Hearn fiasco.. and then attempts at pushing it below $350 had really not been going anywhere... at least not yet... and also people seem to be kind of less convinced that there is any real material issue that is dragging down bitcoin as Hearn was arguing.... I mean seeing through the apparent propaganda...

So far this uptrend has not been on very high relative volume (at least from my perspective), so that causes me to believe that it could be put to a halt or reversed with some voluminous dumping (maybe 10k coins would be sufficient?)


That was way more than a 10,000 coin pump. The markets are connected, so pumping on one or two exchanges isn't enough if the others don't follow.  No, the market clearly believes that the miners will be able to convince and/or pressure Core into including a hardfork in the roadmap. I am nearly not so optimistic, but as Keynes said, markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.



3431. Post 13887677 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

if you know how much power the network is consuming (about a gigawatt or 1 million kilowatts)
and you know how much power costs ($0.10/kWh)
and you now how many transactions are being processed (~4TPS)
We can figure out how much each transaction really costs unsubsidized by speculators.

@ $0.10/kWh X (1,000,000 kilowatts)= $100,000/hr

4 transactions/sec X (3600seconds/hr) = 14,400 transactions/hr

$100,000/14400 transactions = $6.94 PER TRANSACTION

Feel free to check my math, but that's about how efficient the bitcoin network is currently at maximum capacity. If there are fewer transactions, it is even less efficient.  Security and decentralization are very important factors, but this is not competitive with ACH and SWIFT, or even credit cards.  The way to increase efficiency is by massively increasing the number of transactions while keeping the total power costs almost the same.

THAT is why we want to lift the blocksize limit.  We have a very very expensive, inefficient network. Security is great, but too much armor on your armored truck will limit it's cargo capacity. 




3432. Post 13887941 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 15, 2016, 03:07:52 AM
if you know how much power the network is consuming (about a gigawatt or 1 million kilowatts)
and you know how much power costs ($0.10/kWh)
and you now how many transactions are being processed (~4TPS)
We can figure out how much each transaction really costs unsubsidized by speculators.

@ $0.10/kWh X (1,000,000 kilowatts)= $100,000/hr

4 transactions/sec X (3600seconds/hr) = 14,400 transactions/hr

$100,000/14400 transactions = $6.94 PER TRANSACTION

Feel free to check my math, but that's about how efficient the bitcoin network is currently at maximum capacity. If there are fewer transactions, it is even less efficient.  Security and decentralization are very important factors, but this is not competitive with ACH and SWIFT, or even credit cards.  The way to increase efficiency is by massively increasing the number of transactions while keeping the total power costs almost the same.

THAT is why we want to lift the blocksize limit.  We have a very very expensive, inefficient network. Security is great, but too much armor on your armored truck will limit it's cargo capacity.  

Your cost per kWh is a bit high (some farms in E Washington are getting 2.5-4 cents for hydro power, allegedly some chinese are getting it for near free), and your tx/s is also a bit high (2.7 or 2.8 from my observations), they balance out somewhat... you're in the ballpark.

Either fees paid go up, security goes down, or we spread the cost over more transactions with a capacity increase. If only satoshi would have considered this... smh.

These artificial scarcity jokers seem (pretend) to ignore the competitive advantages this bestows on altcoins/chains. Our good ol BTC isn't the only game in town, and it will only get worse unless we defend our competitive advantage and network effect vigorously.

Wrong. The Toomim Bros in Eastern Washington charge $95/kilowattmonth which translates to $0.132/kWh with discounts if you buy for several months.  Their cheapest package (for twelve months paid in advance) is $80 per kilowattmonth which is $0.111/kWh. If anything, I have been overly conservative in my cost calculations.

China has cheaper electricity, but it is subsidized. They are also externalizing costs through burning low grade coal in power stations with little smog control. You can expect price to get closer to actual costs over time as more stringent air pollution regulations go into effect, government budget cuts reduce the subsidy, etc.

As for TPS, I was making an argument for costs at maximum theoretical capacity.  If we use your numbers (2.8 TPS) we get a cost per transaction of 10,080 xactions/hr which makes the cost $9.92 per transaction.

Blockchain.info uses a different calculation, but they are saying it costs ~ $8.57 per transaction

https://blockchain.info/stats

I completely agree with you about how this is destroying our ability to compete and jeopardizing our first mover advantage. 



3433. Post 13888255 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 15, 2016, 03:56:19 AM
Wrong. The Toomim Bros in Eastern Washington charge $95/kilowattmonth which translates to $0.132/kWh with discounts if you buy for several months.  Their cheapest package (for twelve months paid in advance) is $80 per kilowattmonth which is $0.111/kWh. If anything, I have been overly conservative in my cost calculations.
-snip-

You think the Toomims are running a business... or a charity?

I will eat my shoe if they're paying more than 5 cents.

They have a facility to run, power is only part of their costs.


Edit:

Thankfully I'll be eating sushi and not shoe leather tonight (PDF warning):
http://www.grantpud.org/component/edocman/1675-rate-schedule-14-2016/download

$ 0.01826 per kWh for the first 7,300,000 kWh
$ 0.03250 per kWh for all additional kWh


that's crazy cheap!  From an economist's viewpoint, that's also subsidized. The Grand Coulee Dam was built in the 1930's as a public works project. I do get your point, though. The Toomims are definitely not running a charity.



3434. Post 13889161 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 15, 2016, 07:37:44 AM
pretty awesome that bitcoin resisted human induced inflation.



That's not even close to an accurate description of what happened. Cripplecore is resisting taking some armor off the truck to allow more cargo capacity. As a result we have an $8/transaction network.  Good luck winning any races with that.



3435. Post 13890123 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

So basically you smallblockers are saying you WANT to pay $8/transaction. The road map shows that capacity will only increase at some point in the future when power consumption also increases, maintaining the high cost. 

That's absolutely crazy.  There may be a demand for what amounts to a wire transfer of gold bars, but it's a tiny market compared to payments, remittances, title xfers, micropayments, etc.
 
How secure is the network going to be with all of the fees going to third parties on the layers rather than to the miners? Think about it: when the block reward gets quartered (two halvings), those miners will need those fees or network security will be harmed.

Keeping blocks small will HURT security.




3436. Post 13890181 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 15, 2016, 09:51:44 AM
I don't necessarily disagree with you that there will be people that want more than 21m coins.

An argument like that will never be presented "we want more coins and high inflation for the lolz".

It will be presented as "we want cheap txs".... Arguments like "People want cheap txs, who are you to stop that".... Populist bullshit like "bigger blocks" and the "dangers" of "fullblockalypse".

There is no comparison between a hard fork to raise the blocksize and a hard fork to increase the 21 milion cap on supply. The former is a minor property that almost everyone agrees will need to be changed at some point. I owned Bitcoins for years before I even know there was a max blocksize.  I knew of the 21 MM limit before I bought my first coin.  

A slippery slope argument is a logical fallacy.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope



3437. Post 13890911 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 15, 2016, 10:53:35 AM
I don't necessarily disagree with you that there will be people that want more than 21m coins.

An argument like that will never be presented "we want more coins and high inflation for the lolz".

It will be presented as "we want cheap txs".... Arguments like "People want cheap txs, who are you to stop that".... Populist bullshit like "bigger blocks" and the "dangers" of "fullblockalypse".

There is no comparison between a hard fork to raise the blocksize and a hard fork to increase the 21 milion cap on supply. The former is a minor property that almost everyone agrees will need to be changed at some point. I owned Bitcoins for years before I even know there was a max blocksize.  I knew of the 21 MM limit before I bought my first coin.  

A slippery slope argument is a logical fallacy.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope

Dude increasing the 21 M limit and increasing the block size is the same thing.

What? Whaaaaaat?
I'm clearly not aware of that! What are you talking about? What's the link between block size and coins cap?

It is called instigating a _precedent_, changing a protocol parameter such as the 21M limit is 1 line of code, just like the blocksize limit.

Anyway, glad to see that such governance coup is impossible and that nobody, not even core can do anything about it.

This is a bullshit argument. See "slippery slope" reference above.  The only way miners would want to eliminate the 21MM cap is because they aren't getting enough in fees to remain profitable, which will be MORE likely to happen if those fees are going to third parties in sidechains and layers instead of them. 

Nobody else would want to increase total bitcoins as it would devalue their existing holdings.



3438. Post 13891265 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on February 15, 2016, 11:57:34 AM
we can have only a limited amount of tx everyday... Limit already reached today with maybe 1 million bitcoiners! So how do you want to reach teh billion? That's impossible!

Did I miss something?

1. Limit is reached today thanks to the tons of dust due to low fees
2. Anyone can build systems on top of bitcoin to make instant and almost free transactions for micropayments and not only micro.

1. The network capacity is half a million transactions per day no matter how high the fees are. Fees don't change capacity.

2. If people are forced onto layers, then the fees that go to securing the network will go to the layers also, depriving the miners of needed compensation when the blockreward gets halved. If the 1 MB limit is never raised, then the network will eventually be funded by those same half million people even if billions are using it in layers and side chains.  That will present a security problem. 

extrapolating out hashing difficulty, the mining network in a couple of years will be several gigawatts, all funded by fees because the block reward will be next to nothing. That means that fees will have to reflect a cost of hundreds of dollars per transaction if we keep the 1 MB limit! 



3439. Post 13891549 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on February 15, 2016, 12:24:54 PM

I explained it to you many times already but fine. Things (w/e they are) only have value if the supply is limited and they have a purpose. How limited something is determines it's value (together with its utility value). The block size at the moment is in limited supply (1 MB roughly every 10 minutes), so a place on that has a certain implied value (this will be the fee in the long term, right now it's not very visible because of the huge subsidy which skews actual fees). The value of the sum of the fees determines the amount of security because this is how the miners are paid (the miner market is a commodity market so it will approach break-even long term. Total fees will equal security). Therefore if the block size is increased the value of size on the block chain goes down and thus the amount miners get paid goes down and so does the security.

This is a basic error in the understanding of economics. a limited supply doesn't determine value. This is the Beany Baby argument of many of Bitcoin's detractors and it is fallacious.  My shit is in limited supply, but it isn't valuable because of that.  It isn't valuable at all because there are substitutes, assuming someone wanted to buy shit in the first place. 

Higher fees will reduce dust, but it will also prevent transactions of marginal utility.  The margins is where growth occurs, so higher fees will also prevent growth. 

There is a reason why we are still trading at <40% of the ATH more than two years ago.  This is the reason. Smallblockers, you don't understand economics.



3440. Post 13891674 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on February 15, 2016, 12:42:41 PM
1. The network capacity is half a million transactions per day no matter how high the fees are. Fees don't change capacity.

2. If people are forced onto layers, then the fees that go to securing the network will go to the layers also, depriving the miners of needed compensation when the blockreward gets halved. If the 1 MB limit is never raised, then the network will eventually be funded by those same half million people even if billions are using it in layers and side chains.  That will present a security problem. 

extrapolating out hashing difficulty, the mining network in a couple of years will be several gigawatts, all funded by fees because the block reward will be next to nothing. That means that fees will have to reflect a cost of hundreds of dollars per transaction if we keep the 1 MB limit! 


1. Economics is about dealing with scarce resources, not free shit, especially of the self-defeating kind.

2. Therefore the upper-layers managers will do exactly what you ask: paying higher btc fees thanks to the higher volume that they manage -not work at a loss and compensating it with volume :-D

Economics is about measuring efficiency. You think having an artificial scarcity makes something more valuable, but you can't raise the value of CocaCola by reducing the amount you bottle. People will just buy Pepsi. Some very loyal customers may be willing to pay more, but there is a limit to how much more you can charge. 

You can't make up a loss on volume, but you can make up a smaller profit.  Bitcoin fees are low now because it is an introductory offer, intended to attract new customers.  We need several orders of magnitude more customers before we can raise fees. 



3441. Post 13891797 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

If we're all so worried about security and centralization, why aren't we concerned that over 70% of hashing power is in China? That effectively gives the Red Chinese government and the PBoC a kill switch.  They can nationalize the mines.  Then they can double spend.  Even if we fork off of them, they can just point to the new fork and double spend again (assuming we keep the SHA256 hashing).

Censorship resistance?  How do you figure? 

a blocksize upgrade is a tiny threat compared to that.



3442. Post 13894233 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 15, 2016, 02:00:02 PM
I don't necessarily disagree with you that there will be people that want more than 21m coins.

An argument like that will never be presented "we want more coins and high inflation for the lolz".

It will be presented as "we want cheap txs".... Arguments like "People want cheap txs, who are you to stop that".... Populist bullshit like "bigger blocks" and the "dangers" of "fullblockalypse".

There is no comparison between a hard fork to raise the blocksize and a hard fork to increase the 21 milion cap on supply. The former is a minor property that almost everyone agrees will need to be changed at some point. I owned Bitcoins for years before I even know there was a max blocksize.  I knew of the 21 MM limit before I bought my first coin.  

A slippery slope argument is a logical fallacy.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope

It was a known fact that as we go forward subsidy reduction will be compensated by increased tx fee revenue for the miners. We are nearing the second halving and we are at around 3/4ths of the monetary base already being distributed - leaving just 1/4 left. So where exactly is the increased fee revenue?

Miner compensation was supposed to roughly equal out because after the halving, $/BTC price was supposed to double or greater. Fees as a percentage of total miner compensation is something that should gradually happen over time. It's not something that can be forced.  If it won't happen naturally, it won't happen at all. People have alternatives.

Quote

What are the fees? 1-2-3 cents? Are we serious? And you are blaming "cripplecore" etc etc, like if it was 2mb then something would change (fees would actually be lower because first block inclusion would be assured even at 10 satoshi per byte).

Right now the fee is the risk of transacting on an experimental network still in alpha.  When the network has been tested and has become a reliable business tool used by millions, then fees will be more explicit.


Quote
And forkers went out and said "ohhh we can't have a fee market, we must go to 8MB and 20MB urgently because the rising fees are unacceptable, they will kill bitcoin adoption" etc etc. They pretended all txs <1MB are all legit and that the lack of more space is preventing ...scaling real btc txs, instead of simply crowding out the spam.

It's not anyone's place to say how big a transaction has to be to be legitimate. If we have real economic freedom, we get to decide that for ourselves. You don't want nonmonetary uses of the blockchain, but it is precisely colored coin type property title transfers that are likely to pay high fees relative to their BTC value.  In fact without them, it's hard to imagine who besides middlemen performing settlements would pay. 


Quote
If you make a precedent in favoring near-zero cost txs through hard forks, because you somehow have an ideological opposition to one of bitcoin's first principles (that as we go forward fees per block will rise) then you can make it again by increasing inflation instead of fees. You used to say that you don't want to pay fees because you bought your right to transact when you bought your coins and now you are saying "ohhh with lightning there will be less fees for the miners etc etc". It seems you spin it any way you like just to stir stuff.

that's all wrong. Let's say we are talking about water instead of blockspace. We have a small community with a creek running through it and water is basically free. I think the water market will grow in the future because our settlement is growing and future industrial uses of water will make it scarce enough to become a commodity.  You think the community isn't growing fast enough for that to ever happen naturally so you pass a law forbidding anyone from washing their car or watering their lawn.  You have it backwards.  Who's going to move to a community where you can't water your lawn?

People might move to Los Angels with water rationing but that is because there are enough economic and social opportunities to compensate. Few will move to bumblefuck nowhere and be willing to suffer the same restriction. Los Angels would have never become Los Angels if they have those sorts of water restrictions when it was a pueblo. Too many other towns didn't.

I actually own some property where this exact scenario is taking place. The local water district holds a monopoly on water supply. The town was designed for five thousand people, but it is a failed development with only about three hundred year round residents.  My water fees are higher than my property taxes and I don't even have a tap! They argue that they need to charge me anyway because the water district needs money for operations and with fewer residents, they need higher fees. The population has not grown in the five years I've owned the land.

We need a critical mass of users before a fee market becomes a necessity. Bitcoin's first principles is that the blockreward subsidizes mining until that happens. You can't make it happen. If you try to force it, you'll just scare off the new users and prevent the very thing you are trying to create.



3443. Post 13894851 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: becoin on February 15, 2016, 05:58:35 PM
Maybe ETH is helping with some of BTC's issues.............
Etherium new comers are those that missed BTC price rise. They hope that ETH will repeat BTC spectacular price rise. But will be very disappointed.

Facebook newcomers are those that missed the MySpace price rise. They hope that FB will repeat the spectacular MySpace price rise, but will be very disappointed.

Google newcomers are those that missed the Yahoo! price rise...



3444. Post 13895119 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 15, 2016, 06:25:16 PM
Maybe ETH is helping with some of BTC's issues.............
Etherium new comers are those that missed BTC price rise. They hope that ETH will repeat BTC spectacular price rise. But will be very disappointed.

Facebook newcomers are those that missed the MySpace price rise. They hope that FB will repeat the spectacular MySpace price rise, but will be very disappointed.

Google newcomers are those that missed the Yahoo! price rise...

Whatever comparaison your sick brain can come up with, sure ethereum is a company. Bitcoin is not.

Cassette tape newcomers are those that missed out on the vinyl boom.
CD player newcomers are those that missed out on the cassette tape boom.
MP3 player newcomers are those that missed out....

The reason why it's a good idea to have a distRibuted network is because of censorship resistance, but we DON'T HAVE CENSORSHIP RESISTANCE WITH 3/4 OF MINING IN RED CHINA!

We are arguing about whether or not our body armor should be water resistant when it doesn't stop bullets! This whole thing is a moot point. We buy low quality crap from China because it's cheap. This now includes our money.




3445. Post 13895395 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 15, 2016, 07:13:51 PM
All aboard the failboat at that hospital. Their entire IT department should be fired for not having backups, having users with admin accounts on desktops and for being complete flunkies. Then the management should be fired for not funding security.

Flunkies.

Or how about you bitcoiners just, maybe, not h4xx0r hospitals? How would that be?

@pizza77: nah, it's actually good for Bitcoin -- the hospital will have to buy 9,000 BTC, CCMF!!

hackers gonna hack.

bitcoin has made that sector more profitable which is a damn shame...

but as a result computer systems all over are getting secured.

It's an added expense.  As a result, our already sky high medical costs will increase. It's like we made a weed killer that somebody used to poison a school cafeteria.



3446. Post 13895523 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 15, 2016, 07:28:19 PM
All aboard the failboat at that hospital. Their entire IT department should be fired for not having backups, having users with admin accounts on desktops and for being complete flunkies. Then the management should be fired for not funding security.

Flunkies.

Or how about you bitcoiners just, maybe, not h4xx0r hospitals? How would that be?

@pizza77: nah, it's actually good for Bitcoin -- the hospital will have to buy 9,000 BTC, CCMF!!

hackers gonna hack.

bitcoin has made that sector more profitable which is a damn shame...

but as a result computer systems all over are getting secured.

It's an added expense.  As a result, our already sky high medical costs will increase. It's like we made a weed killer that somebody used to poison a school cafeteria.

right let's call up the internets CEO, complain about all the hackers and put an end to this "bitcoin thing"

We could call the Chairman of the Communist Party of China, because he absolutely could shut it down, but I think he supports hacking.



3447. Post 13895664 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: becoin on February 15, 2016, 07:46:57 PM
We could call the Chairman of the Communist Party of China, because he absolutely could shut it down, but I think he supports hacking.
There is more democracy in China than in the US. Political class in China (the Communist Party) has 4 wings competing for leadership while political class in US (the Establishment) has only 2 wings. So, the political monopoly is in the US not in China!

That's like saying there is more freedom in Fascist Italy than in Nazi Germany. It's probably true, but so what?  They were both terrible places to live, especially if you were a minority.

If ANYONE has the Bitcoin kill switch, and somebody certainly does, that means our project has failed at censorship resistance.



3448. Post 13895836 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: blunderer on February 15, 2016, 08:06:48 PM
...
That's like saying becoin is more crazy than billyjoeallen. It's probably true, but so what?

Yeah, but bja makes perfect sense in the parts that aren't broken, becoin is batshit through & through.

I've been called many things, but never a totalitarian until now. It's a first.



3449. Post 13895908 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 15, 2016, 08:17:10 PM
...
That's like saying becoin is more crazy than billyjoeallen. It's probably true, but so what?

Yeah, but bja makes perfect sense in the parts that aren't broken, becoin is batshit through & through.

Yah, he's been talking so much sense lately that his China->US->Nazi Germany leap of grey matter caught me off guard.

If THAT's what you took from what I wrote, then either you're not listening or I'm communicating improperly. I was saying that the U.S. is a low standard for censorship resistance/freedom.  In some ways, China may be more free, I don't know. It doesn't matter.  I don't want to get off subject, which is that somebody has a kill switch. It doesn't matter if that someone is Motherfucking Aristotle.  If there is a kill switch, Bitcoin is not censorship resistant. 



3450. Post 13896768 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 15, 2016, 09:23:27 PM

If users are going to be put off by, say, 10-20 cents in fees, then perhaps they can buy plenty of lube and go get fucked by the banks and the paypals instead. Having 1-2-3 cents in fees and complaining that it's the end of the world if we go upwards and that it's crippling adoption, when RL banking payments are charging the hell out of us (and they are being used everyday by billions of people) and we get fucked by them constantly, is somewhat hypocritic.

Besides the main selling point of BTC shouldn't be an addiction to near-zero cost txs (which we know that is not sustainable in the long run), but rather its decentralized nature and its advantages over central banks (as a token/currency) and commercial banks in terms of controlling your money, paying without trusted 3rd parties which could withhold or confiscate your money, the non reversibility of (confirmed) txs etc etc.

It's not 20 cents in fees. It's $8 and it's being subsidized by you and me, the buyers of BTC.

And it's not decentralized with 75% of the mining in China.  We are operating with the required permission of The People's Democratic Republic of China.



3451. Post 13897356 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 15, 2016, 10:09:58 PM

If users are going to be put off by, say, 10-20 cents in fees, then perhaps they can buy plenty of lube and go get fucked by the banks and the paypals instead. Having 1-2-3 cents in fees and complaining that it's the end of the world if we go upwards and that it's crippling adoption, when RL banking payments are charging the hell out of us (and they are being used everyday by billions of people) and we get fucked by them constantly, is somewhat hypocritic.

Besides the main selling point of BTC shouldn't be an addiction to near-zero cost txs (which we know that is not sustainable in the long run), but rather its decentralized nature and its advantages over central banks (as a token/currency) and commercial banks in terms of controlling your money, paying without trusted 3rd parties which could withhold or confiscate your money, the non reversibility of (confirmed) txs etc etc.

It's not 20 cents in fees. It's $8 and it's being subsidized by you and me, the buyers of BTC.

And it's not decentralized with 75% of the mining in China.  We are operating under the required consent of The People's Democratic Republic of China.



The centralization of mining power doesn't ipso facto mean the centralization of Bitcoin, does it? Do you think it does?

Yes, because the Chinese government could nationalize the mines and then double spend. The Red Chinese government has a long and storied history of nationalizing industries when it suits their purpose. 



3452. Post 13897412 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 15, 2016, 09:56:42 PM
if you know how much power the network is consuming (about a gigawatt or 1 million kilowatts)
and you know how much power costs ($0.10/kWh)
and you now how many transactions are being processed (~4TPS)
We can figure out how much each transaction really costs unsubsidized by speculators.

@ $0.10/kWh X (1,000,000 kilowatts)= $100,000/hr

4 transactions/sec X (3600seconds/hr) = 14,400 transactions/hr

$100,000/14400 transactions = $6.94 PER TRANSACTION

Feel free to check my math, but that's about how efficient the bitcoin network is currently at maximum capacity. If there are fewer transactions, it is even less efficient.  Security and decentralization are very important factors, but this is not competitive with ACH and SWIFT, or even credit cards.  The way to increase efficiency is by massively increasing the number of transactions while keeping the total power costs almost the same.

THAT is why we want to lift the blocksize limit.  We have a very very expensive, inefficient network. Security is great, but too much armor on your armored truck will limit it's cargo capacity. 



A more correct number would be approx 400MW for the entire network and $0.05/kWh. You can't mine competitively with$0.10/kWh and efficiency is much greater than 0.71J/GH.

You don't have to take my word for it. Blockchain.info keeps a running calculation:

https://blockchain.info/stats

currently running ~$7.09/transaction.



3453. Post 13897804 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 15, 2016, 11:34:47 PM

If users are going to be put off by, say, 10-20 cents in fees, then perhaps they can buy plenty of lube and go get fucked by the banks and the paypals instead. Having 1-2-3 cents in fees and complaining that it's the end of the world if we go upwards and that it's crippling adoption, when RL banking payments are charging the hell out of us (and they are being used everyday by billions of people) and we get fucked by them constantly, is somewhat hypocritic.

Besides the main selling point of BTC shouldn't be an addiction to near-zero cost txs (which we know that is not sustainable in the long run), but rather its decentralized nature and its advantages over central banks (as a token/currency) and commercial banks in terms of controlling your money, paying without trusted 3rd parties which could withhold or confiscate your money, the non reversibility of (confirmed) txs etc etc.

It's not 20 cents in fees. It's $8 and it's being subsidized by you and me, the buyers of BTC.

And it's not decentralized with 75% of the mining in China.  We are operating under the required consent of The People's Democratic Republic of China.



The centralization of mining power doesn't ipso facto mean the centralization of Bitcoin, does it? Do you think it does?

Yes, because the Chinese government could nationalize the mines and then double spend. The Red Chinese government has a long and storied history of nationalizing industries when it suits their purpose.  

Don't you think pools would just point elsewhere?

They might, but it wouldn't help. ChiComGovPool would still have the asics, so unless we forked away from SHA256, they'd still be able to mount a 51% attack.



3454. Post 13897865 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 16, 2016, 12:27:55 AM
...
Don't you think pools would just point elsewhere?

They might, but it wouldn't help. ChiComGovPool would still have the asics, so unless we forked away from SHA256, they'd still be able to mount a 51% attack.
He might be confusing a huge factory farm passing itself of as two different pools (easy) with being able to actually hide the factory farm (drawing 999gadzigawatt/hr and having a thermal footprint of an erupting volcano) from the government.

yeah, a Bitcoin mine is a little bit easier to find and harder to move than a TOR node.  It's an unforeseen flaw in the PoW algorithm.



3455. Post 13898254 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 16, 2016, 12:35:35 AM

nice, but its the blocks that matter and there we only see 1 block so far. pretty disappointing if you ask me.

Antpool hasn't switched yet. They're expecting to do so soon.

https://twitter.com/JihanWu/status/694080283407069184

What do you think would happen in a BJA Commiepocalypse situation?

Most Bitcoin companies in China are as committed and decent as any bitcoiner (cue lambie), but I'm not comfortable with having to trust a socialist dictatorship to not interfere. They don't have to nationalize anything. That's what you do in a country when you are used to having to justify your actions. The chinese government will only have to make a few phone calls. I don't see why they would do such a thing, but again, I don't like having to trust them.

I agree with that. The problem is that they could shut us down or pressure the miners to adopt some "features" that benefit the Sate.  I don't know what those features may be, or even if they would bother us at all, but the fact that they can do it is contrary to the design and principles of Bitcoin.



3456. Post 13898314 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 16, 2016, 01:51:08 AM
Seriously, Gavin was asked straight up "When were you co-opted and why are you trying to destroy bitcoin?"

Gavin answers with " a couple years ago - and yes I've stopped beating my wife - I guess is the only appropriate answer to that."

Who the Fuck would say something like that?

Someone asked a non-serious question gave a non-serious answer.  Gavin sounds more mentally balanced than you do.  You think the CIA and the CFR have mind control rays or something? You can't flip Gavin because he's a boring computer nerd who pays his taxes. he's boring. They have no control over a guy like that and if they did, you would see a change in his personality, and there hasn't been one. 

What was he supposed to say when invited by the CIA? Fuck off? How would that have helped us? He probably told them they could use it to pay their informants. It's what I would have said.



3457. Post 13898977 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: ImI on February 16, 2016, 02:42:54 AM

nice, but its the blocks that matter and there we only see 1 block so far. pretty disappointing if you ask me.

Antpool hasn't switched yet. They're expecting to do so soon.

https://twitter.com/JihanWu/status/694080283407069184

What do you think would happen in a BJA Commiepocalypse situation?

Most Bitcoin companies in China are as committed and decent as any bitcoiner (cue lambie), but I'm not comfortable with having to trust a socialist dictatorship to not interfere. They don't have to nationalize anything. That's what you do in a country when you are used to having to justify your actions. The chinese government will only have to make a few phone calls. I don't see why they would do such a thing, but again, I don't like having to trust them.

I agree with that. The problem is that they could shut us down or pressure the miners to adopt some "features" that benefit the Sate.  I don't know what those features may be, or even if they would bother us at all, but the fact that they can do it is contrary to the design and principles of Bitcoin.

you see if they have to add some "features" that the chinese gov wants its pretty easy and completely different from our problems at the moment. we would simply fork away. the reason we have so much discussion at the moment is just because both sides have arguments on their side, but in such a situation we would fork in 24h and thats it.


You don't understand how it works. It's an open protocol. You can't stop them from just pointing at the new fork.  You would have to fork away from SHA256, and that would mean mining from ground zero. A complete reboot. The end of Bitcoin alpha. 

We can't just fork away.  Why is this so hard to grasp? 



3458. Post 13899635 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 16, 2016, 06:06:23 AM
[
Do you know *anything* about Bitcoin nodes, or will asking further questions be unproductive?

All I know about bitcoin nodes is that any attempt to change the rules of consensus will end badly.

Probably exactly the result you're looking for.



Actually, it's the consensus rules themselves that are in the process of ending badly. This is not foundational to Bitcoin anyway, as it started only after Gavin relinquished his role as lead developer. 



3459. Post 13908755 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: gentlemand on February 16, 2016, 09:21:38 PM

OMIGOD. Why wasn't I informed of this? I want Blockstream on the line right now for me refund.

"There is general agreement in the Bitcoin community that the system must remain decentralized to prevent the possibility of any company or government controlling the currency."

So we decentralize by putting three quarters of our mines in one government's jurisdiction? 

Why am I the only one apparently concerned by this? Everybody cool with Chinese government's hand on the kill switch?



3460. Post 13908963 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 16, 2016, 11:10:15 PM

"There is general agreement in the Bitcoin community that the system must remain decentralized to prevent the possibility of any company or government controlling the currency."

So we decentralize by putting three quarters of our mines in one government's jurisdiction?  

Why am I the only one apparently concerned by this? Everybody cool with Chinese government's hand on the kill switch?

who care about some government shutting down mining farms?

it will provide great opportunity for the rest of the miners and newcomers.

bitcoin is the government plague. too late for them to do anything about it.

PS: fuck the MIT, and fuck Gavin.

What if they don't shut them down? What if they just take them over? What give's Bitcoin it's security, stability and advantage over altcoins is the massive mining infrastructure. If we had to start over, we may never recover. 

You couldn't fork away from China without also making every SHA256 ASIC on the network useless. It's an open protocol so the ChiComs could just point to any new fork and instantly be able to mount another 51% attack.  That means we wouldn't just lose the Chinese Mines. We would lose all the mines. 

This is an even bigger problem than Block Size, IMHO.  Whoever controls the mines controls Bitcoin.



3461. Post 13909026 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: criptix on February 16, 2016, 11:35:24 PM
billy how's your short going?

#rekt

sorry i kinda had to do it - but i think if you hold on a bit more then maybe... Grin Wink

The short was a hedge bet. The vast majority of my holdings are in cold storage.  Anyone not hedging until this governance issue plays out is taking an awful risk, IMHO.



3462. Post 13909189 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 17, 2016, 12:00:13 AM
i'll bet 1$ on >410 in <1hour

You're on. No need for escrow. I trust you.



3463. Post 13909241 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 17, 2016, 12:07:52 AM
i'll bet 1$ on >410 in <1hour

You're on. No need for escrow. I trust you.

woot!

ok,  if price hits >410 within 50mins you pay me 1$ if not i pay you 1$, bitstamps price.

I was gonna say BFX, but Stamp works for me. Tic, tic, tic...



3464. Post 13909366 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on February 17, 2016, 12:09:52 AM

"There is general agreement in the Bitcoin community that the system must remain decentralized to prevent the possibility of any company or government controlling the currency."

So we decentralize by putting three quarters of our mines in one government's jurisdiction?  

Why am I the only one apparently concerned by this? Everybody cool with Chinese government's hand on the kill switch?

... at which point a HF does become necessary and a new POW algorithm will be adopted, something more centralising-resistant.

>"more centralising-resistant." Huh
you know why mining is consolidating? (hint its not centralizing)  It's because efficiencies in algorithm processing are being horded by the ASIC fabricators. As this technology democratizes (natural market competition) mining consolidation will biggin to diversify. It's a lack of understanding that leads to the mental shortcut that mining consolidation can be projected in a linear fashion until there is one cartel.  

Making the treat to choose a new PoW algorithm is an attack on the very incentive needed to motivate investment to grow and secure the network.  

I completely agree with this. What is needed is not less mines in China, But more mines outside of China.  It should worry all of us that this isn't happening to any meaningful degree.  Electrical power is 2 cents/kilowatthour in Eastern Washington, right outside of Microsoft's back door, so why are we letting the Chinese dominate mining?

I'll tell you why: The few American chip makers in the space like 21 are indeed hoarding the chips. This is a huge mistake, because they are onboarding all the risk. Sell miners and make money or keep them and mine. And then double down again by keeping the coins instead of selling them.

You may be good at speculating/trading
You may be good at making ASICS
You may be good at mining

But the chances are infinitesimal that you can be good at all three very difficult, competitive and specialized skills.  

Bitmain is the only company selling retail mining equipment and their miners are shitty, overpriced and inefficient. 21 could compete with them profitably without much effort, but they are too greedy, wanting to keep the miners for their own micropayments channel. Bitfury is doing the same thing overseas. They are not investing in a distributed network. They are investing in making it less distributed. 




3465. Post 13909553 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 17, 2016, 12:38:00 AM

"There is general agreement in the Bitcoin community that the system must remain decentralized to prevent the possibility of any company or government controlling the currency."

So we decentralize by putting three quarters of our mines in one government's jurisdiction? 

Why am I the only one apparently concerned by this? Everybody cool with Chinese government's hand on the kill switch?

... at which point a HF does become necessary and a new POW algorithm will be adopted, something more centralising-resistant.

>"more centralising-resistant." Huh
you know why mining is consolidating? (hint its not centralizing)  It's because efficiencies in algorithm processing are being horded by the ASIC fabricators. As this technology democratizes (natural market competition) mining consolidation will biggin to diversify. It's a lack of understanding that leads to the mental shortcut that mining consolidation can be projected in a linear fashion until there is one cartel.  

Making the treat to choose a new PoW algorithm is an attack on the very incentive needed to motivate investment to grow and secure the network.  

I completely agree with this. What is needed is not less mines in China, But more mines outside of China.  It should worry all of us that this isn't happening to any meaningful degree.  Electrical power is 2 cents/kilowatthour in Eastern Washington, right outside of Microsoft's back door, so why are we letting the Chinese dominate mining?

I'll tell you why: The few American chip makers in the space like 21 are indeed hoarding the chips. This is a huge mistake, because they are onboarding all the risk. Sell miners and make money or keep them and mine. And then double down again by keeping the coins instead of selling them.

You may be good at speculating/trading
You may be good at making ASICS
You may be good at mining

But the chances are infinitesimal that you can be good at all three very difficult, competitive and specialized skills. 

i hate to break it to you, but fear of the chinese government confiscating all the mining farm in order to attempt a 51% attack is an irrational  fear.

short of this highly fantastic sanario, i see no problem having majority of hashing power where the majority of poeple on earth live.

I have no problem with the Chinese. If mining was distributed between Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore and Mainland China, this wouldn't be an issue at all, but the mines are all within a single political jurisdiction.  That's a major problem.  Censorship resistance isn't the ability to say whatever you want because the guy in charge lets you. It's saying whatever the hell you want because nobody can stop you. 

Worse case scenario is not that China cracks down, but that Bitcoin is such an ineffective tool to achieve freedom that they never need to crack down. That should worry us a lot more.

If Bitcoin ever becomes what you and I hope it becomes, then it will be a real threat to TPTB in China and they will have the means, motive and opportunity to stop it if more than half of all the mines are within their borders. There is absolutely no fucking way that Bitcoin can achieve major currency status without either being fought or co-opted by the State.  That is inevitable and right now we have no plans to deal with it.



3466. Post 13909611 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: tex99 on February 17, 2016, 12:47:07 AM

The Chinese government won't confiscate all the mining farms to do a 51% attack. It would give people a bad impression of them. If they were to take any action against bitcoin or the farms it would be to make mining illegal in China and outlawing the possession of bitcoins. They already banned/unbanned bitcoin multiple times and I don't rule out them banning/unbanning it again, but I don't think it's likely.

This is the most ignorant, naive statement I could imagine. Ever heard of the Tiananmen Square massacre?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989

You think the ChiComs care more about our impression of them than their sovereignty, you don't know them.

If Bitcoin interferes with China's economic/monetary policy, they have the means motive and opportunity to stop us.  If Bitcoin DOESN'T interfere with policy, then what's the fucking point?

If Bitcoin is needed, it will be fought and possibly killed. If it is not needed, then it will probably die from lack of demand.

This is why concentration of mining matters. 




3467. Post 13909625 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 17, 2016, 01:02:45 AM
i'll bet 1$ on >410 in <1hour

You're on. No need for escrow. I trust you.

woot!

ok,  if price hits >410 within 50mins you pay me 1$ if not i pay you 1$, bitstamps price.

I was gonna say BFX, but Stamp works for me. Tic, tic, tic...

~20 mins left and i still need to see 1/2 1/4 million dollars get dumped on stamps.


double or nothing? for >410 in the next hour.

Done!



3468. Post 13909678 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 17, 2016, 01:07:37 AM

The Chinese government won't confiscate all the mining farms to do a 51% attack. It would give people a bad impression of them. If they were to take any action against bitcoin or the farms it would be to make mining illegal in China and outlawing the possession of bitcoins. They already banned/unbanned bitcoin multiple times and I don't rule out them banning/unbanning it again, but I don't think it's likely.

This is the most ignorant, naive statement I could imagine. Ever heard of the Tiananmen Square massacre?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989

You think the ChiComs care more about our impression of them than their sovereignty, you don't know them.

If Bitcoin interferes with China's economic/monetary policy, they have the means motive and opportunity to stop us.  If Bitcoin DOESN'T interfere with policy, then what's the fucking point?

If Bitcoin is needed, it will be fought and possibly killed. If it is not needed, then it will probably die from lack of demand.

This is why concentration of mining matters. 



A bunch of wacky double spends? What's the worst that could happen?

Um, I don't know, maybe send the same coins to twelve exchanges simultaneously and crash the price down to pennies? and then sell every NEW coin they mine to keep it there?



3469. Post 13909711 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 17, 2016, 01:16:08 AM
i'll bet 1$ on >410 in <1hour

You're on. No need for escrow. I trust you.

woot!

ok,  if price hits >410 within 50mins you pay me 1$ if not i pay you 1$, bitstamps price.

I was gonna say BFX, but Stamp works for me. Tic, tic, tic...

~20 mins left and i still need to see 1/2 1/4 million dollars get dumped on stamps.


double or nothing? for >410 in the next hour.

Done!



Hahahahahah...

I think that this should be a decent example that bets can be small and reasonable in order to show that they are really serious.. rather than betting some bullshit high amount that requires some trust.


As far as the bet itself, this may be one way for BJA to make some real money on his bitcoin bets... just keep doubling down, and possibly BJA will become rich.. when he stops at $1024, and requests that Adam pay up... hahahahahaha   Wink

It would have to be much more than that for me to break even. I'm $4,2084 upside down on my short. Good thing I'm making more money on my cold storage valuation than that.



3470. Post 13909963 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 17, 2016, 01:36:40 AM
i'm fairly certain i will lose the bet and THEN price will go above 410  Grin

There's a very good probability of it.  Incidentally, if you want my short to be force liquidated, all you have to do is pump up to $460 in the next six hours. After that, I will have more money available to either post as margin or add to my short. That's the advantage of lending out my fiat. I can't do something stupid with it while it is lent out. 




3471. Post 13910012 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

That's 2$, Adam. Double or nothing again?



3472. Post 13910042 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 17, 2016, 02:08:13 AM
That's 2$, Adam. Double or nothing again?


as in life it always pays to play these games, sometimes you score somthing priceless.

Is that a yes?  You know, as soon as you stop betting, it will probably skyrocket.



3473. Post 13910090 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

It's going back up! Come on, Adam. It's only four bucks.



3474. Post 13910178 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 17, 2016, 02:19:44 AM
That's 2$, Adam. Double or nothing again?


as in life it always pays to play these games, sometimes you score somthing priceless.

martingales are fun ... until you break the global monetary system

global monetary system is known to be broken, isnt it? isn't that what 2008 was about? i'm afraid I understand bitcoin better then i understand global monetary policy, so i'm not sure if what you sugest is ture or not...  Grin

The global monetary system is beautiful in it's insanity. It's based on debt as every unit is lent into existence. Every one of those units will need to be paid back with interest, so there is not enough money in the world to do it, so more and more coercive measures are needed to get people to borrow.  IF credit stops expanding, the whole thing will collapse into a black hole.

Artificially low interest rates. money printing. Tax breaks for loans like mortgages. Government deficit spending.  New money is created to pay the interest on existing debt, but that new money is created as debt and also will be required to be paid back with interest. 



3475. Post 13910621 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 17, 2016, 02:45:43 AM
It's going back up! Come on, Adam. It's only four bucks.

na

i gata go to bed if i bet 4$ i will stay up, and my girl will be sad, and thats just no good for me.


but hey $4 says >412.5 by morning, take it or leave it.

you've made $2 so far, why not bet $4

i really gtg,

let's make a few more bets on some 2hr candles or somthing tomorrow, it's fun!

Why the hell not? You've been a good sport, so ok.  deal.



3476. Post 13910706 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 17, 2016, 02:58:50 AM
-snip-
Bitmain is the only company selling retail mining equipment and their miners are shitty, overpriced and inefficient. 21 could compete with them profitably without much effort, but they are too greedy, wanting to keep the miners for their own micropayments channel. Bitfury is doing the same thing overseas. They are not investing in a distributed network. They are investing in making it less distributed.  

You got maybe one out of three there, overpriced.

Aside from the S2... all my bitmain gear has been rock solid [s1 through s5]. They even supported the S1 well longer than expected by offering safely packed upgrade hashing boards/controllers to convert to S3 on the old frames, heatsinks, and fans.  

The S7 is pretty efficient, and got to the retail market for this gen well before a bunch of the other's chips were even fabbed. Of course they were/are priced high, pretty much the only game in town for joe retail. Hopefully that will change once the big guys have their own mines humming, probably after the halving, amirite?

Bitmain/Antpool mined the first classic block by a major pool today... that alone is a big + in my book.

Jihan Wu, co-founder, seems to get it:  
https://twitter.com/JihanWu/with_replies


You're crazy. You think a S7 28nm can compete with 14nm chips? You're eating what? 1,293 watts? Unless you're getting free electricity, it will take you a year just to recoup the cost of purchase, and by then who knows what the difficulty will be?  We know for sure the block reward will be halved.

You have to speculate that the price will go up to compensate, but if you're doing that anyway, why not just buy coins? It's a much more liquid asset than mining gear.

Look, I like Bitmain. I just wish they had some competition. It seems like free money for chipmakers, but those greedy bastards wont sell to the public.




3477. Post 13912193 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on February 17, 2016, 07:32:27 AM
Adam should've bet again, it's fantastic how reliable of an indicator he is Cheesy

Hey BJA, 5$ says todays candle hits 420$/USD, deal? 

no thanks.  I've already got enough riding on this.



3478. Post 13914899 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 17, 2016, 11:13:45 AM

This is my hobby. I also moderate for http://jstreet.org/. You should come and read our articles and support the progressive movement.


Isn't that the lefty Jew site?
I like it that you oppose the neocons, but c'mon. Progressivism?



3479. Post 13915896 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

I can tell you this. I don't know about $400, but we're never gonna see $300 again. 



3480. Post 13917493 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 17, 2016, 03:06:23 PM
It's going back up! Come on, Adam. It's only four bucks.

na

i gata go to bed if i bet 4$ i will stay up, and my girl will be sad, and thats just no good for me.


but hey $4 says >412.5 by morning, take it or leave it.

you've made $2 so far, why not bet $4

i really gtg,

let's make a few more bets on some 2hr candles or somthing tomorrow, it's fun!

Why the hell not? You've been a good sport, so ok.  deal.

GOOOOOD morning
 Grin

yeah, you won your two bucks back. Congratulations.  We're even.


EDIT:

I'm a little confused. It was a double or nothing bet, right? because you only owed me two before I lost the last one, but it seems we bet $4, so I might owe you two, but that's not nothing.  

three bets. I won, won, lost. the bets were $1,$1,$4?? I thought you meant you were risking four $ total, but maybe I misunderstood you. I'll leave it on your honor. If you say I owe you $2, I'm good for it.




3481. Post 13917901 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 17, 2016, 05:50:49 PM
It's going back up! Come on, Adam. It's only four bucks.

na

i gata go to bed if i bet 4$ i will stay up, and my girl will be sad, and thats just no good for me.


but hey $4 says >412.5 by morning, take it or leave it.

you've made $2 so far, why not bet $4

i really gtg,

let's make a few more bets on some 2hr candles or somthing tomorrow, it's fun!

Why the hell not? You've been a good sport, so ok.  deal.

GOOOOOD morning
 Grin

yeah, you won your two bucks back. Congratulations.  We're even.

ok now...

300$ says every single month price will be > then the previous month for the next 10 years. Grin

I'd take you up on that, but I don't want to have $300 tied up in escrow for ten years.  My short is in eminent danger of getting rekt, so I'd have to pull it out of cold storage.  If you're right, $10 worth of bitcoin today would more than cover it!

I agree with you, it looks like the bear market is finally over, but there will be down months after the next bubble.

I guess people figured out even a contended hard fork would not leave two chains for more than a day or two, tops. This blocksize issue is not going to go away, but remember in 2013 we all suspected Gox was insolvent, but it didn't stop the Great Bubble. 

Markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. Now I'm thinking fullblocalypse and the halving cancel each other out. Either way, they're both well known and likely priced in. 




3482. Post 13918194 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 17, 2016, 06:33:51 PM
billyjoeallen, get the fuck off the forums, and close your short!


BFX will close it for me when I get force liquidated. 



3483. Post 13919154 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 17, 2016, 08:05:20 PM
It's going back up! Come on, Adam. It's only four bucks.

na

i gata go to bed if i bet 4$ i will stay up, and my girl will be sad, and thats just no good for me.


but hey $4 says >412.5 by morning, take it or leave it.

you've made $2 so far, why not bet $4

i really gtg,

let's make a few more bets on some 2hr candles or somthing tomorrow, it's fun!

Why the hell not? You've been a good sport, so ok.  deal.

GOOOOOD morning
 Grin

yeah, you won your two bucks back. Congratulations.  We're even.

ok now...

300$ says every single month price will be > then the previous month for the next 10 years. Grin

I'd take you up on that, but I don't want to have $300 tied up in escrow for ten years.  My short is in eminent danger of getting rekt, so I'd have to pull it out of cold storage.  If you're right, $10 worth of bitcoin today would more than cover it!

I agree with you, it looks like the bear market is finally over, but there will be down months after the next bubble.

I guess people figured out even a contended hard fork would not leave two chains for more than a day or two, tops. This blocksize issue is not going to go away, but remember in 2013 we all suspected Gox was insolvent, but it didn't stop the Great Bubble.  

Markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. Now I'm thinking fullblocalypse and the halving cancel each other out. Either way, they're both well known and likely priced in.  




u really are short ?? no wonders this thing pumped. .. i disagree that halvening cancels out bitcoin that cant scale.. it aint gonna matter how many coins are mined... if this thing still cant scale after the halvening .. well it will only have been a YEAR and HALF of waiting. #ridiculousness #GimpedCoin

Yeah, I'm short. I have a tiger by the tail and I can't let it go. Really stupid, I know, but I'm so far upside down now that I might as well let it ride.  Just look for like a  spike on BFX. That'll be me blowing up.


Bitcoin can't scale, but that won't stop the gamblers from pumping. We all suspected something was wrong with Gox, but it didn't stop the Big Bubble in 2013.  The Chinese are still driving this thing and you know how Asians drive...



3484. Post 13919516 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: tomothy on February 17, 2016, 08:31:30 PM
So is the current upward trend based on anything specific? It doesn't seem that any fundamental disagreements have been resolved. Is this simply people hunting shorts to push it up to then ride shorts down?

(I expected some movement due to alter pump and dumps but was still surprised with this. I expected some ltc movement before btc movement. )

What's driving this up trend and what's the thought as to where we are going? I guess I expected more 380 sideways until 2mb resolved. I'm happy for the increase, it just doesn't seem real and I'm having difficulty believing we are now upward and onward. Like weird btc ptsd lol

Two things:
It's the end of Chinese New year and the banks are open again there.

The Chinese miners sent a group letter to Core pledging that they would not change client software, but would they please give a date for a 2MB hard fork and tell us when they decide in the next three weeks?

The Chinks who are behind the pump seem to think that will force Core's hand because of the implied threat that maybe they won't be so committed without a clear answer.  Nobody in China wants to see a contentious hard fork and now they think they have avoided the risk.  Core has yet to respond publicly. 

I think this is overly optimistic, but what do I know? It seems like celebrating a winning election before the votes are counted, not exactly an unknown occurrence in Bitcoinspace.



3485. Post 13922354 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 18, 2016, 03:49:25 AM
will it drop below 400 again, will it shoot for 440?

who knows!

but what is crystal clear is that at this point ( 417.9 ) a small bump or dip in either direction will determine the outcome!


418.3!

we have our answer!

onward ┗(°0°)┛






 You means 416? The reverse Adam indicator is back in service!



3486. Post 13927232 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 18, 2016, 09:35:31 AM

EVERYONE wants bigger blocks, except for these guys, and it's not because they are all knowing gods and know what's best for us. there are many poeple that understand the nitty gritty details who agree bigger blocks is safe.


From what I saw it seems like bigger block is at least canted by all users. It's the miners who don't want it?

the chinese miner, along with everyone else, were ready for 8MB.

the block size increase has been pushed back for one reason alone, the core dev team deems it unsafe.

who am i to disagree? i'm no one...

but gavin isn't no one, and fucking big chunks of hashing power isn't no one either....


CORE MUST DIE!
they forced our hand, it's them or us....



You are saying two contradictory things. Core wont cave or lose and the miners won't switch if people are still buying bitcoin. So knock off the "BUY BUY BUY!" shit until we get this resolved or it won't get resolved.





3487. Post 13927581 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 18, 2016, 03:00:19 PM

While I typically advice people to avoid using off the chain solutions and centralized bitcoin banks, it isn't fair to compare Mtgox to Coinbase and circle. There is a world of difference between the two... and it isn't irresponsible for new users to temporarily use these services while they learn about bitcoin. You have to weigh risks , and a new user has far more risk at losing their btc with a personal mistake, technical problem or virus than the risks inherent with a regulated and insured institution where their largest risk is capital gains taxes theft.

New users should just be made aware of the tradeoffs.


I hear what you're saying, but in a way they are like Gox, except more professional and honest. If you don't hold the private keys, you don't own Bitcoin.  Bitshares is partnering in a decentralized exchange, so it is possible. I just would like to see some with anywhere close to the volume of Stamp or BFX.

Ideally we want an ecosystem so robust that fiat isn't the main onramp, but rather businesses trading goods and services for coin. There is no way to do that however without a meaningful fix to the scaling problem that doesn't involve third party middlemen.  If we need middlemen, then there is no point to this whole experiment. It is a failure.

Don't worry about my short. I have posted extra margin, so you can't blow it up without making me a lot more on my cold storage stash.



3488. Post 13927921 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 18, 2016, 03:21:07 PM
...
I'd rather have my dad use a trezor than coinbase.

The thought of my dad using a Trezor or Coinbase -- either one -- unsettles me a bit.
On par with imagining him scoring crack. At 2a.m. In the projects...

LOL. We have a ways to go on making consumer friendly offline wallets.  People do need to make a paradigm shift and understand that freedom comes with a cost. It takes more effort to be your own bank.  I fear most won't understand the value in it until they have fallen prey to depositor bail-ins, seized accounts, or just an outright bank failure with or without deposit insurance.





3489. Post 13928296 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

A node is simply a cost of doing business. It's a small cost, but it is a real one. You don't want nodes to share fees, because then people will run nodes just for the fee, and that's a bad idea. Right now, I'm running SwampNode on XT because that's the way I can vote. I am planning on switching to Classic soon.

Ten years ago, few had smart phones. Twenty years ago, few had cell phones. Now they are accepted as a cost of doing business. I drive a truck and a trucker without a cell phone is unemployed.

You see? there is already incentives in place. A node is a way to vote and to verify transactions. We have enough nodes and the number is growing.







3490. Post 13928465 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 18, 2016, 04:25:54 PM
WTF does that mean? This isn't one of your anarcap hugging sessions. Are you going to suicide bomb MIT or are you going to drink an extra can of Red Bull and code a bit more?

Why would violence even be an option if you know I follow the non-aggression principle ? You have a very odd perception of our values. We are very motivated to keep the true nature and purpose of bitcoin alive... This means we not principally motivated by short term profits but have long term goals and are willing to make sacrifices and work hard to achieve them. If the community forces a contentious hard fork , so be it, we will happily allow the community to go separate ways, but be aware we will not acquiescence on our values and join a majority hash rate. There may be a short term struggle and than potentially some changes which will allow both chains to exist securely.  This doesn't mean we cannot find a solution through consensus and make certain reasonable consolations that don't directly compromise our values. Adding 1.7-2Mb capacity to segwit was that compromise and we want to dramatically scale up capacity in the future the right way. It would be great if you would join us building something great , If not , I understand and won't interfere with your choices.

You don't speak for all AnCap's. I absolutely support forking to bigger blocks and I have been consistently anarcho-capiltalist from my first post on this forum.

Anarchists want no rulers, so why would you support Core's technocratic hegemony? Regardless of the technical arguments against bigger blocks, why would you allow anyone to have veto power over any upgrade?  As anarcho-capitalists, we know that concentrated power can be abused and inevitably will be abused eventually.



3491. Post 13928678 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 18, 2016, 04:55:25 PM

You don't speak for all AnCap's. I absolutely support forking to bigger blocks and I have been consistently anarcho-capiltalist from my first post on this forum.

Agreed. Anarchists are like atheists, they have millions of unique voices and perspectives. I understand your perspective and respect it.

Anarchists want no rulers, so why would you support Core's technocratic hegemony? Regardless of the technical arguments against bigger blocks, why would you allow anyone to have veto power over any upgrade?  As anarcho-capitalists, we know that concentrated power can be abused and inevitably will be abused eventually.

Who says I support Core or Blockstream technocratic hegemony? I have repeatedly supported a diverse set of implementations with separate developers, and separate repositories. This is why further work in libbitcoinconsenssus is so important. I will not make the sloppy and misleading assumption that implementations that break consensus rules are akin to choosing between different browsers on the internet. This is a flawed analogy and a dangerous one as well. Choosing between implementations that diverge on consensus rules is akin to choosing between protocols in a distributed consensus system which is dependent upon agreement.  I encourage experimentation in different coins and protocols and will never interfere with your right to HF at any moment, but lets not pretend that this is merely about creating a diverse set of developer communities when multiple implementations have existed peacefully for a long time now.

This is funny indeed. I love how the libertarian in this discussion keeps using the words "we will" and variants on that. Sounds really weird!

I wouldn't consider myself a libertarian , but you do realize that anarchists can and do have solidarity with other anarchists. I invite you to meet some in person.

All analogies are imperfect or they wouldn't be analogies, just arguments.  You are correct that a losing fork is not like a browser with lower market share. It will almost certainly die quickly, but on a different time frame it is similar. Nobody is using Mozilla anymore.  Yeah, it's different, but it's hard to dumb down this conflict for the idiot masses without losing some of the essential elements. It doesn't mean it's an intentionally misleading analogy.



3492. Post 13928806 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

in a way, this is really funny. Core wants to keep blocks small to encourage nodes and they are. They have spawned over a thousand Classic nodes.

Eventually, they may be forced to upgrade to 2 MB just to prevent 8 MB blocks. I kinda hope they screw that up because I have no problem at all with 8 MB blocks.  The only way to improve the efficiency of the network without sacrificing significant security is by scaling up.  We want an armored truck, not a safe on castor wheels pulled by a horse.




3493. Post 13929154 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 18, 2016, 05:21:01 PM
Yeah, it's different, but it's hard to dumb down this conflict for the idiot masses without losing some of the essential elements. It doesn't mean it's an intentionally misleading analogy.

If not intentionally misleading its is downright stupid when a perfectly good analogy is available . Gavin and Brian spouting that nonsense should know better and its disturbing to hear it from them.

To be clear ... this is a far better analogy--

Different browsers = Bitcoin Core, Bitcore, libbitcoin , ect....
Different protocols = TCP/IP and those that suggest we make some changes to make a new internet where existing browsers suddenly become incompatible with it.

Notice how standards that break the functionality of old browsers are rarely , if ever introduced on the internet. I can still run "mosaic-ck" and lynx browser on my linux computer with no problem and while I am unable to see or use all that fancy javascript/css/flash/ect I can use TCP/IP just fine as originally intended and surf the web, send emails, and read text. The internet was built with stacks and layers of technology to insure backward compatibility and a HF is the exact opposite of this. So no, it isn't just an imperfect analogy but one that is extremely misleading.

We want an armored truck, not a safe on castor wheels pulled by a horse.

We are building a tank with hardened steal, exploding anti- tank missile panels, advanced engine and suspension components for maneuverability, and a more efficient engine to carry a larger capacity and more ammo...

You simply want to double the weight of the tank and throw a bigger cc diesel engine in her that guzzles more fuel.   

Perhaps I'm making my opponent's argument for them, but are you familiar with Microsoft's "embrace and extend" strategy to kill off or neuter competing technology? 

Gavin is simply putting names on the ballot. He knows this is an election and only one side will win.  Perhaps he thought that was obvious. 

There is a reason we don't use armored tanks to transport money.  There is a reason why soldiers don't have body armor that weighs 300 pounds and can stop missiles. There is such a thing as too much security. 

$8 worth of security for each and every transaction is too much security for now. Maybe at some point in the future, we'll need that, but we'll never get to that point without the growth than can only come from cheap transactions.

This "field of dreams" business model of smallblockers is baffling.  You don't run a small bank like that, getting a huge vault and then opening for deposits. You get a small vault and you upgrade when you have too many deposits to hold in the small one.

People are not going to pay for security they don't need, particularly when it is provided by Chinese security guards nervously wondering if they are going to get a phone call from the Commies suggesting they take the day off.




3494. Post 13929473 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 18, 2016, 06:05:21 PM
$8 worth of security for each and every transaction is too much security for now. Maybe at some point in the future, we'll need that, but we'll never get to that point without the growth than can only come from cheap transactions.

This "field of dreams" business model of smallblockers is baffling.  You don't run a small bank like that, getting a huge vault and then opening for deposits. You get a small vault and you upgrade when you have too many deposits to hold in the small one.

People are not going to pay for security they don't need, particularly when it is provided by Chinese security guards nervously wondering if they are going to get a phone call from the Commies suggesting they take the day off.

The difficult thing about this conversation is that we are repeatedly being misrepresented or misunderstood. Core has already agreed to compromise and kick the can by increasing capacity(they are slowly increasing the "bank" vault just like classic).... which means that you really aren't interested in 2MB, but something much bigger... which at this point in time(remember we want bigger blocks too) would be disastrous for bitcoin. Even by Gavin's own calculations Classic could cause a 40% node drop off (worse case scenario) , this is absolutely unacceptable and we need to start reversing this trend immediately.

It really isn't a choice between on the chain decentralized network with large blocks and a decentralized network of payment channels using the main chain as a settlement network. The first option is impossible to accomplish at Visa levels of tx's , It will never happen, not because of any choices we make , but because the technology is just incapable and any future projected technology is incapable of doing this in a decentralized manner. *

* I am open to the idea of unforeseen radical breakthroughs that completely change technology or black swan events... but lets modify bitcoin if these happen and not expect for them to occur.

That's not true. I am interested in bigger increases IF we can do it safely and securely. The issue is that i don't trust core to follow through on their planned increases at all. If they were selfishly interested in throttling the network so that they can make money on their LN side chain regardless of who it hurt, how would they be acting any differently than they are now?

Let's say your girlfriend wants to get married and you have no intention of ever doing it. What do you do? If you're a douchebag, you know that the honest answer will mean you won't get laid, so the solution is to stall so you can keep having sex with her as long as possible. At some point, the girlfriend has to stop fucking until you buy a ring. That's where we're at now. The problem is we keep buying bitcoin (putting out), so douchebag Core keeps on stalling.

SegWit is just ring shopping in the cheapest jewelry store in town. It's not exactly overwhelming evidence of commitment.



3495. Post 13930200 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Uh, I'm not an expert, but doesn't Lightning Network have a routing problem? And by problem, I mean in the sense that pigs have a flying problem.

So to sum up:

Bigblockers think technology will happen that will solve the node harddrive bloat problem and we are ridiculed by people who think technology will happen to solve LN's routing problem for the reason that we can't count on tech that hasn't been invented yet. Hmmmm.




3496. Post 13930669 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 18, 2016, 07:44:16 PM

Uh, I'm not an expert, but doesn't Lightning Network have a routing problem? And by problem, I mean in the sense that pigs have a flying problem.

So to sum up:

Bigblockers think technology will happen that will solve the node harddrive bloat problem and we are ridiculed by people who think technology will happen to solve LN's routing problem for the reason that we can't count on tech that hasn't been invented yet. Hmmmm.

We are way past the whitepaper sir and have working code. Its open source and available for all to see.

https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning
https://github.com/LightningNetwork/lnd


Like I said, I'm not an expert. Perhaps you can explain to a layman how transactions are routed keeping in mind that if it is not distributed, you're just trading Bitcoin IOUs with a middleman. 

I can already buy stuff at Overstock.com with Bitcoin IOUs completely off chain from my Coinbase account. How the hell do I know Coinbase isn't operating a fractional reserve like Gox? (kind of off the subject, but CB did give away a heluva lot of coins in promotions). This is exactly the type of situation Bitcoin was created to prevent. 

Proof of burn isn't sufficient because even if you can prove solvency, you have a censorship vulnerability without distributed servers. So how do you pay the distributed servers without taking fee money away from the miners? 

and even if if if you can answer all these questions satisfactorily, what good is it when the Chinese Powers have the ability to control the mines, meaning the only reason they haven't launched a 51% attack yet is because they don't want to.

If your focus is to keep the main network rock solid enough to build layers on top, do that.  Address the concentrated mining problem. THEN we can argue about scaling. 




3497. Post 13930848 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 18, 2016, 08:20:29 PM

Like I said, I'm not an expert. Perhaps you can explain to a layman how transactions are routed keeping in mind that if it is not distributed, you're just trading Bitcoin IOUs with a middleman. 


I don't think its possible to explain it to you...based upon some of your comments you seem to ignore my explanations where I already answer them. No problem , keep shorting away your Bitcoins and we will see in late 2016 how the LN turns out.

You don't understand. I'm shorting as a hedge.. I WANT you to blow up my short.



3498. Post 13930976 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 18, 2016, 08:38:51 PM
billyjoeallen's short doesn't seem so ridiculous today.

Why do you say that? I had near the worst possible timing.  Shorting over $420 makes sense, but the best thing possible for me to do is just break even. My guess is this thing will peter out at around $450. That was the short I shouldn't have covered.

Look, all the weak hands have seen shaken out in the two year bear market. The problem is that nobody in their right mind will buy now.  That won't stop a pump, because too many people are not in their right mind, but it can't be sustainable until TWO very serious problems are fixed: Mining concentration and scaling. Of the two, scaling is actually the easy one.



3499. Post 13931262 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: becoin on February 18, 2016, 09:01:06 PM
but it can't be sustainable until TWO very serious problems are fixed: Mining concentration and scaling. Of the two, scaling is actually the easy one.
Who cares? We shall see new high above $1200 by the end of the year.

That's like trying to predict the weather a month from now. It's unknowable because things have to happen that can't be predicted.

You may be right IF

We don't have a fullblockalypse. (probable without at least a SW upgrade)
The ChiComs don't launch a 51% attack (unlikely but possible)
a terrorist attack hasn't been found to be funded with Bitcoin
No more MtGox type exchange implosions
MtGox Bankruptcy (200K!) coins aren't sold to satisfy creditors
We don't have a wave of hacker extortions that trigger a widescale crackdown
Satoshi doesn't move his coins
An Altcoin doesn't overcome Bitcoins first mover advantage
Bitcoin doesn't fork contentiously making two chains that both somehow survive (extremely unlikely)
An unknown vulnerability of the code isn't found and exploited
some completely out of the blue Black Swan doesn't take us out in some way nobody has even thought of yet.
















3500. Post 13931533 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 18, 2016, 09:42:01 PM
billyjoeallen's short doesn't seem so ridiculous today.

Yeah, but from what I recall, he began to make it in about the mid $370s and he staggered it a bit to add more and more to it until about the $390s...


So, yeah, it's possible that we may go back down into the $390s or even lower, but BJA was probably considering going into the $360s or lower, which seems a bit of a further stretch.. not impossible, but todays momentum seems somewhat inclined towards the up... with possibly a correction to lower $400s or possibly into the $390s?

Yeah, I'm guessing too.    Sad Sad

if todd tomorrow makes it clear that he will never touch 1MB block size
shit could hit the fan? who knows...

Short term, that would do it, but if he really has no intention of ever touching it and says so, then we could get on with this. We are being strung along. 

OTOH, If Core makes it clear that there will be a 2MB hardfork within six months, then both Classic and my short are dust.

What is most likely is that there will be more noncommittal hemming and hawing and a slow realization that we have been played once again. As Classic approaches 50% of nodes, expect a crash. 

Markets hate uncertainty. That is what you want to bet against, not any particular outcome.



3501. Post 13931963 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on February 18, 2016, 10:00:56 PM
Coin



Explanation


When you start seeing these blocks >95% full consistently (a few weeks from now at present rates), expect a market reaction. 

If we see a price increase of >20%, expect the blocks to fill up.

This will slow but not stop the price rise. 

If non-dust transactions quadruple (in a few months and present growth rates), expect a permanent and growing backlog. 

Of course we will see this happening and so it will never happen. People will just migrate to other coins until one of them gets enough market share to suck off most of the new money and Bitcoin will be a collector's coin. A hobby coin forever.  It'll still grow in value,  but at a much slower rate than the new Cryptocoin, the one where wallstreeters get to be early adopters. 

I imagine a coin where blockreward gets reduced by 10% a year instead of dramatic halvings. Blocksize scaling is built in at predictable intervals.  Mining is done on the the more secure SHA512 or something more quantum computer resistant. It may have a full Turing-compliant scripting language for smart contracts, etc.




3502. Post 13932296 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 18, 2016, 11:05:07 PM

Wall Street doesn't give a toss about decentralization. If it turns out the market doesn't either, eventually a competing hard fork will take Core's place.

It depends on what sort of decentralization we are talking about. Bitcoin businesses need a PREDICTABLE scaling solution to build their business models around.  Trusting Core to fill the need when the time comes is not decentralized at all. Smallblockers want to maintain node decentralization by centralizing code development.

There is a real need for bigger blocks if we want to use the Blockchain for anything more than a settlement ledger. Core only wants monetary writing to the chain. This is a waste of a precious resource that could be the greatest tool for freedom since the Internet itself.

What about mining centralization? That is the problem that nobody but me is talking about and it means Bitcoin is not censorship resistant to the ChiComs.

If there were businesses running bitcoin blockchain based stock exchanges, bond exchanges, currency exchanges, any equity, really, then those companies would have nodes. Anyone who's business involved writing to an immutable ledger would have a node. Bigger blocks mean more nodes.

Right now the only companies with the incentive to run nodes are onramps like Coinbase and Circle.  One of the Largest, Bitpay, will go out of business or switch to LN and won't run nodes anymore because any transaction under $10 will eventually be too expensive to process if the blocksize isn't allowed to scale. Bitpay sponsored a bowl game and brought Bitcoin awareness to millions. That's the kind of company  smallblockers want to drive out of business?





3503. Post 13932436 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 18, 2016, 11:42:42 PM

Wall Street doesn't give a toss about decentralization. If it turns out the market doesn't either, eventually a competing hard fork will take Core's place.
Smallblockers want to maintain node decentralization by centralizing code development.
I don't see any way to decentralize code development. Competing protocols doesn't seem to be the answer.

Why not? As long as we're talking 75% supermajority and a grace period to upgrade before mining incompatible blocks, what's the problem?  A few people may not get the upgrade memo in time? THAT's your big objection?

Elections are messy, expensive and inefficient. Would you prefer a government without them?



3504. Post 13932573 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: ImI on February 18, 2016, 11:52:30 PM

folks? still that block-discussion going on?

isnt it obv meanwhile? classic wont succeed, miners are hesitant to switch.

but core will have to accept a 2MB hardfork in 2017. miners want that.

so case closed. nothing to see here anymore.

Core hasn't accepted that yet. When and if they do, it's off to the races, but not before then.  You need to understand their objection. What if we upgrade to 2MB forks and nothing bad happens? It means that we could upgrade to 4 or 8 or 20. Then the Lightning Network time frame to even be needed or viable gets pushed back possibly indefinitely, and Blockstream gets no new VC money. 

They think this is is a fight for survival for them. They will go down if they lose and we don't yet know if they are willing to take us all down with them by resisting the majority and crashing the market. That's the 65 million dollar question. Will Core remain the reference client and bankrupt their own company or will they hold us all hostage and force us to fight it out with the inevitable market crash that would bring? 

I believe people usually do what's in their own perceived best interest. Core is trying to find out how badly the miners want that 2mb fork.  Is 2MB a request or a demand? They will not honer a request. They will honor a demand if they think it is genuine. The miners may not make one. Core still hopes they can politely refuse the miners without consequence. They may be right, but if they are, Classic nodes will multiply and the market will crash. 

We have recently seen a >$50 rise in price in the middle of a hotly contested election. This is insanity.  The buyers thought that the bigblockers had Core cornered.  They do, but have you ever seen a cornered animal just give up? What would the VC backers of Blockstream think of that? If you think that core cares more about what we think than them, you're dreaming. 

The sad think is that Core doesn't even have a problem. Larger blocks will grow the network faster and actually hasten the need for LN, but they're too stupid to understand that.



3505. Post 13932721 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote
Quote





Smallblockers want to maintain node decentralization by centralizing code development.
I don't see any way to decentralize code development. Competing protocols doesn't seem to be the answer.

Why not? As long as we're talking 75% supermajority and a grace period to upgrade before mining incompatible blocks, what's the problem?  A few people may not get the upgrade memo in time? THAT's your big objection?

Elections are messy, expensive and inefficient. Would you prefer a government without them?


I guess, I don't know. I'd have to read more about how political concepts apply to open-source projects.

What's this got to do with Soccer??

Large corporations also have elections for board members, even if they have a founder with a lot of shares Like Steve Jobs, Bill gates, etc. The reason is that stakeholders can be exploited by a CEO or Board of Directors (the governing body) if there is no way to hold them accountable. 

If there is no way to hold Core accountable, then I will no longer be a stakeholder. I will sell the coins I have held for five years and go away.  The good news for me is that the market will go down if Core loses and up if it wins, so since I want them to lose, I can't lose. I'll either get rich or big blocks.



3506. Post 13932845 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 19, 2016, 12:32:22 AM

folks? still that block-discussion going on?

isnt it obv meanwhile? classic wont succeed, miners are hesitant to switch.

but core will have to accept a 2MB hardfork in 2017. miners want that.

so case closed. nothing to see here anymore.

Core hasn't accepted that yet. When and if they do, it's off to the races, but not before then.  You need to understand their objection. What if we upgrade to 2MB forks and nothing bad happens? It means that we could upgrade to 4 or 8 or 20. Then the Lightning Network time frame to even be needed or viable gets pushed back possibly indefinitely, and Blockstream gets no new VC money. 

They think this is is a fight for survival for them. They will go down if they lose and we don't yet know if they are willing to take us all down with them by resisting the majority and crashing the market. That's the 65 million dollar question. Will Core remain the reference client and bankrupt their own company or will they hold us all hostage and force us to fight it out with the inevitable market crash that would bring? 

I believe people usually do what's in their own perceived best interest. Core is trying to find out how badly the miners want that 2mb fork.  Is 2MB a request or a demand? They will not honer a request. They will honor a demand if they think it is genuine. The miners may not make one. Core still hopes they can politely refuse the miners without consequence. They may be right, but if they are, Classic nodes will multiply and the market will crash. 

We have recently seen a >$50 rise in price in the middle of a hotly contested election. This is insanity.  The buyers thought that the bigblockers had Core cornered.  They do, but have you ever seen a cornered animal just give up? What would the VC backers of Blockstream think of that? If you think that core cares more about what we think than them, you're dreaming. 

The sad think is that Core doesn't even have a problem. Larger blocks will grow the network faster and actually hasten the need for LN, but they're too stupid to understand that.

I'm not entirely clear how LN is propietary in that sense. Is Poon on the Blockstream payroll? How will they make money off it. Sidechains are Blockstream, so maybe there. But LN?

LN will run on centralized servers by Blockstream and maybe others. They will collect transaction fees, some of which will go to the miners when they make on chain settlement trades and some of which they will keep. Liquid (the sidechain) is proprietary and a terrible idea IMHO. If exchanges share liquidity, then they are no longer distributed. A single whale can manipulate the market from one account. Exchanges can operate more easily on fractional reserve, which effectively increases bitcoin supply. 

ECONOMICS:
Money that is too good of a store of value becomes a poorer medium of exchange because people will hoard rather than spend.  OTOH too much spending increases the velocity and effectively increases supply, making a poor store of value.  MV=PQ. There has to be a delicate balance.  Ideally this balance is not achieved by central banker intervention but by allowing currencies to compete. 



3507. Post 13932996 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Here's my uneducated opinion on SegWit:

It's better than nothing. It seems like a poor design idea to make such a complicated alteration of the protocol, but it aids scaling. Seems riskier than changing a 1 to a 2, but if it works on TestNet, I'll play along.  I do not oppose SegWit and welcome it, despite it being a very poor substitute for bigger blocks. 

If there is a rough consensus attack ongoing, it means the bad guys wants us to squabble over how to scale so much that we don't scale.  They will support one side only until it looks like it's going to win and then support the other side. Even if there is not a rough consensus PsyOp, the effect is the same if we can't compromise.

I don't hate Core. I am not married to Classic. I want a scaling solution.  I'm not naive enough to think I'll get everything I want.

Should SegWit be a hard fork or a soft fork? I prefer a hard fork but I don't really care.
Should we have SegWit or 2 MB? I prefer 2MB but I don't really care.
Should we have 2MB once and see what happens or a 2-4-8 schedule? I prefer the latter, but don't care.
Should we run upgraded Core or Classic? I prefer Classic but don't really care.

Just end this crap. If we can do this, I'll close my short and help pump. If there is no solution in place and the market keeps pumping anyway, My short will blow up and I'll start liquidating my cold storage.



3508. Post 13933136 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 19, 2016, 01:35:50 AM
I would still argue against favoritism in the fee economics..

The reason this was done is 2 fold.. incentivize adoption to segwit and more importantly Reduce UTXO growth.

I will remain distrustful of Core's leadership and their conflicted interest in forcing the settlement layer architecture.

How will bitcoin scale to the mainstream if it didn't act as a settlement layer for the main chain? It certainly cant get far by continually increasing the block side.

It can't, but it won't ever need to scale if we don't keep transactions free long enough to build a critical mass of users. We're not gonna grow by having goldbugs suddenly decide it's an awesome store of value that you can't spend but only trade for fiat while paying ever increasing fees.. 

Gold is a store of value because it could be money. Bitcoin will never be a store of value if it CAN'T be money. We won't ever need to scale if we don't maintain/increase Bitcoin's utility. 



3509. Post 13933262 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 19, 2016, 02:10:22 AM
I would still argue against favoritism in the fee economics..

The reason this was done is 2 fold.. incentivize adoption to segwit and more importantly Reduce UTXO growth.

I will remain distrustful of Core's leadership and their conflicted interest in forcing the settlement layer architecture.

How will bitcoin scale to the mainstream if it didn't act as a settlement layer for the main chain? It certainly cant get far by continually increasing the block side.
We won't ever need to scale if we don't maintain/increase Bitcoin's utility.  

... and who increases bitcoin utility?

deadbeats ranting and raving on forums about how terrible all the devs are ... or developers adding features, tools, layers, wallets, protocol extensions?

Only clueless dogs bite the hands that feed them.

People like Gavin, Mike and Jeff you mean?  I help by supporting them. I would even invest/help to create some bitcoin businesses if I knew how much blockspace I could use.  There would be huge potential for title registry/xfer, equities exchanges, smart contracts, etc, but I would need to know what sort of fees I'd be paying and to be certain my transaction wouldn't be locked up for days if I guessed wrong.

Core gets no special credit for just doing their damn jobs, especially when they aren't doing them. Too focused on tilting the playing field in their favor. 



3510. Post 13934444 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 19, 2016, 02:39:08 AM

noone gets to tell devs what they can and can't do ... you choose who you follow, the genuine or the charlatans and deceivers


You are NOT marcus agustus. So  whoever controls his account, here's what I can do. I can say either Core stops stalling or I will sell. I can follow through.

It doesn't matter if Core is sincere in thinking a settlement protocol is best or if they are being selfish and deceptive. What matters is that they want something i don't want and I don't have to play this game if I don't like the rules.



3511. Post 13934559 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: arklan on February 19, 2016, 05:26:03 AM
thanks for the segwit reading guys. quite helpful.

421.97 pretty stable the last few hours. weren't we expecting a breakaway over 420?

Yeah, about that....

Kinda looking like a head and shoulders pattern on the 1 HR chart.



3512. Post 13934626 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 19, 2016, 06:48:31 AM

bitcoin is no game, but if only the billyboy wanker and his alikes would rage quit as hearn did..

We are going to make you pay more than Hearn did.  He sold at ~$300.  He's not a trader. 



3513. Post 13940078 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 19, 2016, 03:50:17 PM
Epic copy-pasta!

Quote
A Call for Consensus

Over the past few months there has been significant attention within the bitcoin ecosystem and beyond on what is commonly referred to as the “block size issue” — the size and scale of bitcoin blocks. There is a pressing need for an inclusive roadmap that takes into account the needs of businesses and all stakeholders.

As a community of bitcoin businesses, exchanges, wallets, miners, and mining pools, we have come together to chart an effective path to resolve this challenge and agreed on five positions we hope will guide the larger community as we move forward together.

The following are five key points that we have all agreed on.
1.We see the need for a modest block size increase in order to move the Bitcoin project forward, but we would like to do it with minimal risk, taking the safest and most balanced route possible. SegWit is almost ready and we support its deployment as a step in scaling.
2.We think any contentious hard-fork contains additional risks and potentially may result in two incompatible blockchain versions, if improperly implemented. To avoid potential losses for all bitcoin users, we need to minimize the risks. It is our firm belief that a contentious hard-fork right now would be extremely detrimental to the bitcoin ecosystem.
3.In the next 3 weeks, we need the Bitcoin Core developers to work with us and clarify the roadmap with respect to a future hard-fork which includes an increase of the block size. Currently we are in discussions to determine the next best steps. We are as a matter of principle against unduly rushed or controversial hard-forks irrespective of the team proposing and we will not run such code on production systems nor mine any block from that hard-fork. We urge everyone to act rationally and hold off on making any decision to run a contentious hard-fork (Classic/XT or any other).
4.We must ensure that future changes to code relating to consensus rules are done in a safe and balanced way. We also believe that hard-forks should only be activated if they have widespread consensus and long enough deployment timelines. The deployment of hard-forks without widespread consensus is dangerous and has the potential to cause trust and monetary losses.
5.We strongly encourage all bitcoin contributors to come together and resolve their differences to collaborate on the scaling roadmap. Divisions in the bitcoin community can only be mended if the developers and contributors can take the first step and cooperate with each other.

Our shared goal is the success of bitcoin. Bitcoin is strong and transformational. By working together, we will ensure that its future is bright.

Together, we are:

Phil Potter
Chief Strategy Officer
Bitfinex

Valery Vavilov
CEO
BitFury

Alex Petrov
CIO
BitFury

James Hilliard
Pool/Farm Admin
BitmainWarranty

Yoshi Goto
CEO
BitmainWarranty

Alex Shultz
CEO
BIT-X Exchange

Bobby Lee
CEO
BTCC

Samson Mow
COO
BTCC

Robin Yao
CTO
BTCT & BW

Ronny Boesing
CEO
CCEDK ApS

Obi Nwosu
Managing Director
Coinfloor

Mark Lamb
Founder
Coinfloor

Wang Chun
Admin
F2Pool

Marco Streng
CEO
Genesis Mining

Marco Krohn
CFO
Genesis Mining

Oleksandr Lutskevych
CEO
GHash.IO & CEX.IO

Lawrence Nahum
CEO
GreenAddress

Eric Larchevêque
CEO
Ledger

Jack Liao
CEO
LIGHTNINGASIC & BitExchange

Charlie Lee
Creator
Litecoin

Guy Corem
CEO
Spondoolies-Tech

Davide Barbieri
CTO
TheRockTrading

Michael Cao
CEO
Zoomhash

如果你想要读中文版,请点击这里。


This is basically the same letter the miners sent, with the same deadline!   They are implying that they want Core to pick a time frame on a hard fork within three weeks or they will support Classic. 

So basically it's the whole world against Core at this point.  1MB4EVA is doomed, But we still have no idea how long it will take to die.  It's hard to imagine Core won't take this deal. Bigblockers have caved on everything but 2MB some time in the next say 18 months. 

Core's best option will be something like SegWit this year, and if everything goes well, 2MB next year with a doubling every other year after that. They will try to figure out what the slowest scaling schedule can possibly be that the majority will accept.  If they guess right, off to the races. If they guess wrong, look out below. 

I've become a pessimist because I have been following this controversy longer than most. I think there is a slight probability that they will guess wrong and Classic will become Bitcoin, but that is by no means certain. Core/Blockstream has demonstrated some really stunning ineptitude with their tin ears, and weak PR.  The voices against them cry louder and louder and have become a chorus, but the most powerful voice, the Market, is perhaps unclear. There is a reason why we are still trading at ~40% of the ATH 27 months later.  I believe Core's obstinacy on the blocksize issue is that reason.  The five year logarithmic uptrend is broken.  It's Core's fault. 

There is no getting rid of Core hegemony without a crash. Either a crash will get rid of them or getting rid of them will cause a crash.  The only way Core can maintain Hegemony is by committing to a HF and moving from their entrenched position. Time to make popcorn.




3514. Post 13940790 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

You really have to appreciate what an epic failure of leadership this is when even Core's strongest supporters are saying essentially that it's 2MB or you're out of a job. 

This last $50 pump was led by the Chinese who seem to think Core has no choice but to cave and they are right. Regardless of how good they are at coding or even if they are right about the problems with scaling, Core is absolutely terrible at maintaining consensus. 

It's Core's job to maintain consensus, but they are the only group preventing it. When the very people who you are supposed to lead are giving you ultimatums, you have failed at leadership.  Yet even now I don't think they understand how badly they have fucked up. They may not even think they have fucked up at all.  These guys may be the best code developers in the world. I don't know. What I do know is they are the worst leaders I have ever seen. 

Steve Jobs was a brilliant designer, but a bad leader and it cost him his job. He learned from the experience though and fought his way back and became an excellent leader. Both he and Apple were better for it. When I look at Vladimir, Maxwell, Adam Back etc, i do not see a Steve Jobs among them. I hope I am wrong.



3515. Post 13941430 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 19, 2016, 06:37:17 PM
fork off already.


This is a good example of what I am talking about. This is something a consensus builder would not say.



3516. Post 13941645 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 19, 2016, 07:36:03 PM
fork off already.


This is a good example of what I am talking about. This is something a consensus builder would not say.

there is no consensus to be found whatsoever with socialist freeshit spammers.

so you are free to fork off to whatever bloated corpcoin, gavincoin, usgcoin..

bitcoin will still exist as is and prevail in value with its conservative original parameters.

Facebook went years without ads to grow it's user base. Is Zuckerberg a socialist?  Youtube did the same thing. So did Google, Microsoft, IBM, Yahoo!...are all these companies charities?



3517. Post 13941857 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 19, 2016, 07:48:06 PM
fork off already.


This is a good example of what I am talking about. This is something a consensus builder would not say.

there is no consensus to be found whatsoever with socialist freeshit spammers.

so you are free to fork off to whatever bloated corpcoin, gavincoin, usgcoin..

bitcoin will still exist as is and prevail in value with its conservative original parameters.

Facebook went years without ads to grow it's user base. Is Zuckerberg a socialist?  Youtube did the same thing. So did Google, Microsoft, IBM, Yahoo!...are all these companies charities?

How many years?

BTC is on it's 7th year, approaching the second halving, and already having distributed nearly 75% of the total monetary base (leaving just 25% for subsidy). Fees are currently at 0.01 - 0.04$ = peanuts, despite "Blocks are full".

For as many years as it takes to reach a critical mass of users.  Businesses and investors are forward thinking.  If fees double every year, in a decade they could be over $10,000 per transaction!  OTOH if $/BTC price doubles every year, miners will still be well compensated with blockrewards even when mining a tiny fraction of coin per block.   Which of these two scenarios would make you want to invest?



3518. Post 13942238 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Which one of the Core Devs do you think will be the first to crack under the pressure? 2 of 5 with commit access are already bigblockers. Who's going to be the swing vote?  Who's going to ragequit?

They successfully fought off XT so maybe they still think they can win, but if they come back with a date for a HF farther out than 18 months, the markets going to take a big steaming dump on their heads. If they don't respond at all by the deadline, it's a big dump. If they say 1MB4EVA, big dump. If they say blah de blah, it's impossible to set a date because reasons...Big dump.

If they say "oh, alright. All that stuff we said we couldn't do? We'll do it", Fucking. Moon.

Politically, It will be Jeff Garzik's win and he becomes Satoshi's successor.
Blockstream will have to explain to the VCs why they just destroyed their own business plan. That would be an interesting conversation to hear.

We will all be sipping margaritas by the pool celebrating my short blowing up while scantily clad Polynesian girls fan us with palm fronds. Odes will be written about Garzik the Great Consensus Builder. Earnest young men will valet park our Lamborghinis.  Empires will crumble.  Maidens will weep with joy and then...

Oh yeah, we still have that concentrated mining problem. Fuck.




3519. Post 13942255 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 19, 2016, 08:21:36 PM
fork off already.


This is a good example of what I am talking about. This is something a consensus builder would not say.


BJA:   I hope that you are not suggesting that deep down inside that you possibly could be a consensus builder.

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

There is no "I" in "consensus", but there is an "us".



3520. Post 13942433 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 19, 2016, 08:55:15 PM
fork off already.


This is a good example of what I am talking about. This is something a consensus builder would not say.


BJA:   I hope that you are not suggesting that deep down inside that you possibly could be a consensus builder.

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

There is no "I" in "consensus", but there is an "us".
OF FUCKING A!!!!

Ok, I'm new to this. Who do we invade?


Fry's Electronics. We will need to build enough supermines by the Grand Coulee Dam to prevent a 51% attack by the ChiComs. 



3521. Post 13942566 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 19, 2016, 09:10:41 PM
fork off already.


This is a good example of what I am talking about. This is something a consensus builder would not say.


BJA:   I hope that you are not suggesting that deep down inside that you possibly could be a consensus builder.

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

There is no "I" in "consensus", but there is an "us".
OF FUCKING A!!!!

Ok, I'm new to this. Who do we invade?


Fry's Electronics. We will need to build enough supermines by the Grand Coulee Dam to prevent a 51% attack by the ChiComs. 

are we blowing somthing up?

i'm in!

My short, hopefully.



3522. Post 13942662 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: blunderer on February 19, 2016, 09:26:52 PM
Oh yeah, we still have that concentrated mining problem. Fuck.

I think this could just be a temporary problem depending on what happens with new hardware like bitfuy's mining lightbulbs, the 21inc machines ...

I guess when every screw-in light bulb in US is replaced with Bitfury's "Remember to NOT shut off your lights" bulbs...

Yeah, mining lightbulbs are a colossally stupid idea, but Bitfury makes really efficient chips and it's their mines outside the U.S. AND China that could make Bitcoin truly censorship resistant.



3523. Post 13942948 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: blunderer on February 19, 2016, 09:47:56 PM
Oh yeah, we still have that concentrated mining problem. Fuck.

I think this could just be a temporary problem depending on what happens with new hardware like bitfuy's mining lightbulbs, the 21inc machines ...

I guess when every screw-in light bulb in US is replaced with Bitfury's "Remember to NOT shut off your lights" bulbs...

Yeah, mining lightbulbs are a colossally stupid idea, but Bitfury makes really efficient chips and it's their mines outside the U.S. AND China that could make Bitcoin truly censorship resistant.

But if electricity costs are lower in China, wouldn't it make sense to mine with more efficient chips there?

Having more than 50% hashing power in one political jurisdiction creates a vulnerability the same way having more than 50% hashpower in one pool does. Douglas County, Washington has plenty of carbon neutral electricity for sale at less than 2 cents/kilowatthour.  Several very large mines are there already, but we need to triple the hashpower to eliminate the possibility of Chinese mine nationalization/51% attack. That attack is not just a remote possibility. The risk gets greater the higher the price gets as long as mining is concentrated.



3524. Post 13943116 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: blunderer on February 19, 2016, 10:17:31 PM
...
Having more than 50% hashing power in one political jurisdiction creates a vulnerability the same way having more than 50% hashpower in one pool does. Douglas County, Washington has plenty of carbon neutral electricity for sale at less than 2 cents/kilowatthour.

Read an interview with some power co. exec somewhere that this wasn't going to be the case for long, will look it up (or you could, it's on the web).

Quote
Several very large mines are there already, but we need to triple the hashpower to eliminate the possibility of Chinese mine nationalization/51% attack. ...

Do you remember the names by any chance?

Most of them understandably keep a low profile, but Jonathan Toomim's mine is there. 



3525. Post 13943520 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 19, 2016, 10:34:11 PM
fork off already.


This is a good example of what I am talking about. This is something a consensus builder would not say.

there is no consensus to be found whatsoever with socialist freeshit spammers.

so you are free to fork off to whatever bloated corpcoin, gavincoin, usgcoin..

bitcoin will still exist as is and prevail in value with its conservative original parameters.

Facebook went years without ads to grow it's user base. Is Zuckerberg a socialist?  Youtube did the same thing. So did Google, Microsoft, IBM, Yahoo!...are all these companies charities?

How many years?

BTC is on it's 7th year, approaching the second halving, and already having distributed nearly 75% of the total monetary base (leaving just 25% for subsidy). Fees are currently at 0.01 - 0.04$ = peanuts, despite "Blocks are full".

For as many years as it takes to reach a critical mass of users.  Businesses and investors are forward thinking.  If fees double every year, in a decade they could be over $10,000 per transaction!  

In a parallel universe where maths works differently, maybe we'd get to 10.000$. In this universe it would work like this:

Year 1: 0.03$
Year 2: 0.06$
Year 3: 0.12$
Year 4: 0.24$
Year 5: 0.48$
Year 6: 0.96$
Year 7: 1.92$
Year 8: 3.84$
Year 9: 7.68$
Year 10: 15.36$

For the time being we have something like

Year 1 to Year 7 = peanuts.

What you propose about consistently low fees can only have 2 outcomes:

1) Miners cutting every low fee tx by themselves and imposing a fee market, which can trigger "riots" and new fork attempts to stop the evil miners from not processing our txs.
2) Idiots pushing for >21mn coins and more inflation "to keep fees low so that more adoption can take place".


I was using 4 to the tenth power, but even if we use your numbers, what about year 12? Over sixty bucks?  and year 13- $122?Huh

Miners are free to exclude any transaction they want and throw away they fees they would collect.  That's how a fee market should work.  They will have to judge the cost/benefits.  We are not in the best position to do that. Core is not in the best position to do that. The miners are.

Thanks for catching my math error. It does apply if fees quadruple every year with a start of 4 cents.

Now let's do the math for BTC doubling every year because of "free" transactions:  That's 400 X 2^10, right?
$409,600/BTC.  Block reward will be 3.125 BTC, so $1,280,000 PER BLOCK. (with no mining fees at all).

Why would this happen? The Core developers themselves said it: "Demand for cheap highly-replicated perpetual storage is boundless". (G. Maxwell, 12/7/2015)

You think people wouldn't invest in nodes to make that happen? You think people wouldn't build mines to make that happen? Build an entire infrastructure to make that happen? That's why we bought bitcoin in the first place, back before we even knew there were scaling limitations.  




3526. Post 13944195 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on February 20, 2016, 12:31:19 AM
i think this is it!

>440 in a few hours!

I CAN FEEL IT!

..

Reverse Indicator Warning  Shocked

LOL that's what I was thinking.



3527. Post 13944750 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Dear City Council:

We, the residents, business owners, employees,  developers and tourists would like some clarification on your proposed plan to upgrade the goat trail that leads into town into an actual road. We understand that you plan on only making it one lane until after the skyscrapers are built but will make it a toll road to keep out the riffraff cluttering the highways.

We know you have plans for a Lightning Train some time in the future, but until then you will focus on the goat trail.  Your proposal for almost doubling the capacity by putting extra saddles on each specially modified goat is something we fully support, but we still would like to know when the trail will be paved.

So if you could clear this up for us, that would be great, because elections are coming up in three weeks.  It would be chaotic and probably harmful if there was a change of government and we don't want that to happen. No way. We totally love you guys.

Sincerely,
Everybody.




3528. Post 13945453 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 20, 2016, 03:58:41 AM
It is fascinating, that anyone seriously thinking we are going to stay at 1/2/4 etc MB blockchain size.

The arguments fearing node centralization are laughable (like everyone back in 2010 - incl. Satoshi - knew). Bitcoin has like minimum a million users with PCs capable to run a node today, yet, less than 1% choose to run a node (the numbers may be waaay worse than that, like 5k "node runners" out of 5million users/holders).

Increasing the blocksize, lets say to 20 MB won't matter regarding the broadcast speed, mempool load, HDD space for the average user to run/not run a node - because they do not do it today, not even with 1MB/ avg. 10 min. They won't change a thing.

Today, if someone runs a node (or more than one) would do it even with 20 MB limits (many would do with way more hardware constrains, would even pay for it - like i do - just out of principle).
It is not technical properties, which are constrain node running, it is knowledge/care.

Does anyone with "smalblock" sentiment really thinks Bitcoin can growth even to 1% of today's financial network transaction volume without scaling the blockchain size to terrabytes in the next 5 years?

"The Blockchain" can bring so much utility besides money transactions! And that is exactly what it needs to be - and what most of us were fascinated about, land/property registry, ownership titles, escrow in an uncheatable global ledger, so no, not a settlement layer. "IT IS ON THE BLOCKCHAIN" should be a proverb for "as final as set in stone"- in the 10/100k$ area, because the account units can do more than coffee buys, yet, those daily 100,000 "coffee buys" will be the big thing to bring the first 1 billionth user. The average Joes, who so many look down here, yet, they are 95% of the population. Bitcoin needs them, we can not have a global financial system without the global....

I can not grasp, how experienced - and certainly well meaning, and i am saying this honestly and respectuflly - bitcoiners miss this point, which is: if blockchain can satisfy more than pure value transaction in its p2p concept, it will magnify in value/unit wise, which is all what WE want.

I think I disagree with this. Bitcoin is an incentives machine. Nobody should be expected to do anything on principle.

Right now the biggest reason to run a new node is to vote. If we reject as a matter of principle that a contended hard fork should ever take place, then that incentive is gone and so is the negotiating power we have with core. If you support Core, run a core node. If you support Classic, run a Classic node. This way nodecount will grow and they will all validate the same transactions until after a supermajority is reached and then a graceperiod.

No node, no vote. That is incentive enough, no matter which implementation you like. SwampNode cost me $137 bucks. 



3529. Post 13945485 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Random thought: What if Satoshi left because he lost his private keys and it's just too painful for him to think about?



3530. Post 13945591 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 20, 2016, 04:53:30 AM
i have a dream! i dream of large corporations/governments competing for blocks with 100,000's of 0.00001BTC fees


I have a dream where a bitcoin is worth $400,000 each three halvings from now so the blockreward is over a million bucks and miners still won't care about fees.  

If BTC value doubles more frequently than the blockreward halves, fees will never be needed to sustain miners. Of course BTC can't grow exponentially in purchasing power forever, but it can in nominal terms if the U.S. Dollar ever hyperinflates.




3531. Post 13945772 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: AZwarel on February 20, 2016, 03:52:46 AM

"The Blockchain" can bring so much utility besides money transactions! And that is exactly what it needs to be - and what most of us were fascinated about, land/property registry, ownership titles, escrow in an uncheatable global ledger, so no, not a settlement layer. "IT IS ON THE BLOCKCHAIN" should be a proverb for "as final as set in stone"- in the 10/100k$ area, because the account units can do more than coffee buys, yet, those daily 100,000 "coffee buys" will be the big thing to bring the first 1 billionth user. The average Joes, who so many look down here, yet, they are 95% of the population. Bitcoin needs them, we can not have a global financial system without the global....

I can not grasp, how experienced - and certainly well meaning, and i am saying this honestly and respectuflly - bitcoiners miss this point, which is: if blockchain can satisfy more than pure value transaction in its p2p concept, it will magnify in value/unit wise, which is all what WE want.

Absolutely! We don't just want to have distributed, decentralized money. We want distributed decentralized everything. 

If the real business of Bitcoin is selling space on an immutable ledger, then the only constraint should be anything that threatens its immutability.  We should sell it as efficiently as possible given that one constraint. 



3532. Post 13945797 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 20, 2016, 05:45:09 AM
Welcome to 1984... citizen.

Are you a suppressive person?



 

"Discussion of a split has already affected price."

Yeah, well lack of scalability has kept us trading at <half ATH 27 months later.




3533. Post 13945892 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Seeing a little upward movement.  Why is everyone so optimistic that Core will move off of their entrenched position because of a couple of polite letters?  If they didn't listen to Gavin, Jeff and Mike whom they know, and they didn't listen to reason at the Stalling Bitcoin Conference, what makes everyone so sure they will listen now? 

Is there something I don't know?  This doesn't seem to me to be a time to buy but to wait and see how this plays out. 

Maybe it's just margin shorts losing their nerve. 







3534. Post 13946223 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

here's why I am bearish:

In poker, if you have a hand with a 10% chance of winning $10,000, it's worth a $1000 bet. I think Bitcoin has a ~25% of being worth $3,000 at the next bubble top if there is one.  There is a 50/50 chance that the scaling conflict will be resolved and a 50/50 chance that either the mining concentration issue will be fixed by adding enough hashpower outside of China or that the ChiComs can't figure out how to launch a 51% attack or choose not to. 

Then there is also the risk that Bitcoin is outlawed, hacked, broken or surpassed by a better coin (50/50)

So Bitcoin should be trading around (O.5 X 0.5 X 0.5 X $3,000) or $375




3535. Post 13946642 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on February 20, 2016, 08:05:09 AM


 Angry  Pervert it all you'd like iCE, it won't be Bitcoin when you're done with it.   Cry

Thanks for posting that wonderful slide, it's like the Rosetta Stone of Bitcoin's Great Schism.

How do you imagine I'm going to cause some radical change in our beloved phlegmatic Honey Badger?

I'm flattered you believe it's within my powers to transmute Bitcoin into some perverted form (via inaction no less!), but can't fathom the internal logic of such a fanciful delusion.

The truth is Honey Badger really doesn't give a shit what I (or you) do (or don't do).

Bitcoin will only stop being Bitcoin if it ceases to be immune to the populist nonsense and moral hazard insisted upon by Gavinista quasi-majoritarians.

Gavincoin's 75% threshold is three wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.

Bitcoin is never going to sacrifice its critical consensus for your high time preference.

The max block size will increase eventually but Sorry, Not Tonight Dear.

If you want to use a democratically elected political currency try the USD, EUR, or CNY.   Wink

Sorry, but you won't get rid of us that easily. Bitcoin price goes down as Classic node count goes up, so if you want the value to appreciate, you will convince your masters that they will give us 2MB or we will end up getting 2MB AND cheap coins through Classic or whatever follows that. 

Bitcoin didn't start with a 1 MB limit as you damn well know and it was not intended to be an economic tool but an anti-spam tool.  21 MM coins is sacred. 1MB is just a feature that has turned into a bug.
Lack of consensus for a specific change is not the same as consensus for the status quo. There is NOT consensus for artificial scarcity of blockspace.  There is lack of consensus, and it's Core's fault.




3536. Post 13946807 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on February 20, 2016, 08:41:02 AM
Core Power Rangers have been given an ultimatum

It's not about votes granted by breathing... it's about votes granted by quadrillions of hashes...  Kiss

You honestly expect Honey Badger to respond to ultimatums (ie threats)?

If X gives a shit about ultimatums and threats, X is not Honey Badger.

As for the [impressively large number of] hashes, their function is to act as well-paid security guards, not executives.

If the security guards start demanding a vote in the boardroom they protect, the board will simply fire and replace them with new rent-a-cops.

There is nothing indispensable about sha256, and if the centralized miner tail tries to wag the distributed socioeconomic majority dog we will simply change to another PoW.

Are you really that stupid? You think you can take our chain, render the entire mining industry incompatible and everyone will just dogpile onto your fork with microhash security?   

The Board isn't just dealing with collective bargaining from the help, but also from the customers and shareholders.   The board is a cunt hair away from getting sent packing by all of us because all they have to do is make one tiny change from a 1 to a 2 and they won't do it. 
I will sell my stash. I will tell everyone I meet that Bitcoin is radioactive. I will spin down my node.  There are thousands like me.

There is nothing indispensable about Core. We want to work with them. Plead, in fact. We would greatly appreciate their cooperation, but we don't need it.  I really want to avoid a fight, but I have already conceded everything I can. Without a commitment to 2MB in a specific timeframe,  I walk and so does half the bitcoin economy.  You give us no choice. 



3537. Post 13946937 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: arklan on February 20, 2016, 09:06:20 AM
Core Power Rangers have been given an ultimatum

It's not about votes granted by breathing... it's about votes granted by quadrillions of hashes...  Kiss

You honestly expect Honey Badger to respond to ultimatums (ie threats)?

If X gives a shit about ultimatums and threats, X is not Honey Badger.

As for the [impressively large number of] hashes, their function is to act as well-paid security guards, not executives.

If the security guards start demanding a vote in the boardroom they protect, the board will simply fire and replace them with new rent-a-cops.

There is nothing indispensable about sha256, and if the centralized miner tail tries to wag the distributed socioeconomic majority dog we will simply change to another PoW.

Are you really that stupid? You think you can take our chain, render the entire mining industry incompatible and everyone will just dogpile onto your fork with microhash security?    *snip*

like i said, "simply."

i am honestly shocked this has taken this long to work out. the original intent was crystal clear. unfortunately that wasn't implemented and now will be rather painful to do so. but the status quo is untenable, and we all know it. the time to fix this is long past, it seems to me.

shame we can't agree HOW to fix it...

We have agreed. We will give Core a chance to come with or do it without them.  There is only one party in this conflict who will not compromise and they have a company with the initials "B.S."  Consensus doesn't just happen. It is BUILT and the very people who should be building it are preventing it, but they are increasingly isolated. The consensus party is coming and Core has an invitation. If they don't want to come, it's on them. 



3538. Post 13946963 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: becoin on February 20, 2016, 09:13:21 AM
With every bitcoin price increase big blocktards are getting more desperate in their funny 'ultimatums'.

What price increase? From $1156? $502? $475? $465? You really think price is going up? 



3539. Post 13947062 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on February 20, 2016, 09:10:15 AM

If Gavincoin forces a situation where catastrophic consensus failure is unacceptably likely, the socioeconomic majority will simply change the PoW to something other than sha256^2.


Are you sure about that? THIS socioeconomic actor will dump my coins on your microhash fork and keep on trucking on the one with the hashpower security.

I'm pretty sure most others will do the same so you petty tyrants can have the sandbox all to yourselves.

A big chunk of that socioeconomic majority already sent Core a couple of polite letters suggesting they might want to think a little bit harder about compromise.

We do not want a war, but by God we will fight it if you give us no choice. 

It's changing a 1 to a 2 for Christ's sake. You wanna burn down the house over that?



3540. Post 13947111 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: becoin on February 20, 2016, 09:40:14 AM
What price increase?
The one that was followed by XT and 'classic' altcoin fork ultimatums. $200, $250, $300, $350, $400... The more irreversible and steady price increase is the more desperate are big blocktard ultimatums. That is obvious.

Dude, we're still trading at less than half the ATH 27 months later. The logarithmic uptrend has broken and smallblockers broke it. 



3541. Post 13947259 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 20, 2016, 09:56:12 AM
Quote
We do not want a war, but by God we will fight it if you give us no choice.  

It's changing a 1 to a 2 for Christ's sake. You wanna burn down the house over that?

No, but apparently you do. War and rumours of war, what is it good for?

There is no split just a small bunch of big-block heads who lost the plot on one number.

Cooler heads will prevail. Price will follow when the big blocks sober up from their delusional power trip.

Cooler heads will prevail and come to the conclusion that digital gold is in greater demand than almost free permanent immutable data storage? I thought y'all said that demand was "unbounded."








3542. Post 13947394 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: becoin on February 20, 2016, 10:12:31 AM
I'll stick with Gavin and his future vision for Bitcoin.
Since when kicking the can down the road is a vision?
Increase block size to 2MB, then to 4MB, then to 8MB, then 16MB, then to 32MB, then to... 1GB? Free space on the blockchain for every spammer. That is Gavin's 'vision'...

it ain't free if ya gotta buy bitcoins to write there. That's why we HAD a longterm exponential uptrend. We thought that we were buying 1 /21 millionth of the whole chain to write on so we paid. Now I ain't paying for shit.  I'll never buy another bitcoin unless it's mined in a 2MB block and I'll advise anyone who asks to do likewise. 



3543. Post 13947474 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: becoin on February 20, 2016, 09:58:41 AM
What price increase?
The one that was followed by XT and 'classic' altcoin fork ultimatums. $200, $250, $300, $350, $400... The more irreversible and steady price increase is the more desperate are big blocktard ultimatums. That is obvious.

Dude, we're still trading at less than half the ATH 27 months later. The logarithmic uptrend has broken and smallblockers broke it. 
Logarithmic uptrend?!... C'mon, buddy. You sound like you sold out all your bitcoins.
Now what? Whiny ragequit?!

My coins have been in cold storage since 2011. My trading account is margin short, but I actually hope you blow that up because it is a hedge.  Pump all you want. You'll never get another dime from me but I have loads to sell.



3544. Post 13947500 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: becoin on February 20, 2016, 10:33:24 AM
it ain't free if ya gotta buy bitcoins to write there.
Yeah, it ain't free. You have to have $0.01 to write there...

You had to pay something that was going up exponentially in value. under your plan all you have to do is unload a depreciating asset. 



3545. Post 13947524 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: dropt on February 20, 2016, 10:37:27 AM

euuww, I think I just puked in my mouth a little recalling that putrid article ...

What's also crazy, when speaking of delivering epic returns since 2009, Gavin was also the lead dev of Bitcoin during the ATH bubble of 2013!

So yes, I will stay true and reject the pretenders.  I'll stick with Gavin and his future vision for Bitcoin.

gavin was a convenient face of reason to present to the authorities when bitcoin was so alien it should have been banned .... take a look at the code, he was at best a maintainer not an innovator (except for the BIP 70 privacy backdoor he insisted on slipping in), now he's just annoying baggage, like some bloatware, that needs to go the way of Hearn.

he was also the prime mover for setting up of the bitcoin foundation (and primary beneficiary as it squandered millions) ... in all its epic fail.

Then why did you reference gains since 2009 and tell me to stay true, reject the pretenders?  By your own points the current Core devs are the pretenders and have brought nothing but losses.

Perhaps you just said something dumb, that you didn't really think through?


I was gonna ask him the same thing.



3546. Post 13947623 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: becoin on February 20, 2016, 10:42:09 AM
You know how the big-block arguments are basically bogus? ... in the end they are appealing to cult of personality (Saint Gavin will save them)
It is not so innocent.

Gavin's 'vision' coincides with banksters narrative we hear every day - yes to bitcoin blockchain, no to bitcoin. For (basically) you don't have to have bitcoins to compete for blockchain inclusion. Unless you think $0.01 worth of bitcoin is considerable hedge against blockchain spam?

You don't pay a penny. You pay a fraction of a bitcoin that was going up exponentially in value. Your coin has less chain-writing utility and so it doesn't appreciate as fast, if at all. 

Don't take my word for it. Look at the five year logarithmic chart.




3547. Post 13947711 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

I think I get it. You smallblockers think this is a mutiny. Well, let's talk about mutiny.  I was a sailor, once. In the entire history of the U.S. Navy, there has never been a mutiny. In any war. ever. Why? It's not because we were particularly good sailors.

It's because a mutiny requires a MASSIVE FAILURE OF LEADERSHIP.




3548. Post 13951316 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: becoin on February 20, 2016, 11:19:48 AM
Well, let's talk about mutiny.

I don't see any mutiny. I do see Harakiri ritual. After the XT fiasco Gavin decided to 'classically' double down. Obviously his master left him no choice but commit ritual suicide.

It's called "seppuku", Pal. If you're gonna insult someone, do it right.

Classic will triumph and if it doesn't, we will try something else. We won't quit. Bitcoin has been hijacked by people with a fundamental misunderstanding of economics.

Scarcity doesn't create value. Utility creates value.



3549. Post 13951774 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on February 20, 2016, 12:51:17 PM
It baffles me that some people are still bearish.

Huh Have you seen these guys? Core smallblockers are deranged. You can't reason with them. 

They refuse to throw us "gavinistas" even a bone.  That's there words, not mine.  They see ANY concession as a failure.  And some people thought we'd get consensus before dinner. Welcome to Gavin's World, where negotiating with brain-eating zombies is just another day at the office.

If someone is too stupid to see the leverage you have over them, your leverage is useless in a negotiation. You have to demonstrate it.  I'm frankly surprised that Core even showed up. 

Back to wall observing: is it buy the rumor sell the news or the reverse? I forget.

or in other words, should we be expecting a smallblocker dump or a bigblocker dump?






3550. Post 13951926 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 20, 2016, 05:52:53 PM
It baffles me that some people are still bearish.

Huh Have you seen these guys? Core smallblockers are deranged. You can't reason with them.  

They refuse to throw us "gavinistas" even a bone.  That's there words, not mine.  They see ANY concession as a failure.  And some people thought we'd get consensus before dinner. Welcome to Gavin's World, where negotiating with brain-eating zombies is just another day at the office.

If someone is too stupid to see the leverage you have over them, your leverage is useless in a negotiation. You have to demonstrate it.  I'm frankly surprised that Core even showed up.  

Back to wall observing: is it buy the rumor sell the news or the reverse? I forget.


or in other words, should we be expecting a smallblocker dump or a bigblocker dump?





i've been giving that some thought

the "news" in this case could be the follow through with the plan

so UP till july 2017

everyone ok with that?

I would be ecstatic with that, but I don't think it will play out that way. We're dealing with a management team that rejects as a matter of principle ANY accountability to stakeholders. It's fucking Divine Right of Kings. Do you think parliament could have forced King John to sign the Magna Carta without an army at their backs?  Our miners are looking pretty uncomfortable and out of place in their battle armor.




3551. Post 13952252 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 20, 2016, 06:32:06 PM


Although I am surprised to see anyone thought I had any principles, it does seem like the draft for the consensus is somewhat different from what I initially thought.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46qpua/bitcoin_roundtable_consensus_statement/

"This hard-fork is expected to include features which are currently being discussed within technical communities, including an increase in the maximum effective block size, to more than 2 MB and less than 4 MB, and will only be adopted with a broad support across the entire Bitcoin community."

I've partially accepted the fact that "big blockers" have lost this round and have been trying to figure out if there's any future for Bitcoin after the miners decided to go with Core. I was very encouraged by two things today:

1. Core will commit to a HF of at least 2MB and have the code ready for July. Even if the trigger is Feb 1 2017 it would mean that a lot of the uncertainty surrounding Bitcoins viability would be gone. 2MB with Segwit would allow Bitcoin to grow on the main chain. Not much, but maybe enough for it not to experience an economic collapse.

2. Miners were explicitly threatening to ditch Core if they didn't give them a bump in the block size limit within a given time frame. That is powerful. What little I've understood from this debate is that parts of core are manipulators and lying bastards and can't be trusted, so it would be nice if someone held a gun against their heads.

However, If the miners accept the wording quoted above then this agreement is a total loss. We've seen the phrase "maximum effective block size" before. It takes into account the theoretical increase from segwit and all the other witchcraft they've been talking about lately. Bitusher even started including LN blocks into the calculations in an earlier discussion in this thread. We might end up with less than 1MB maxBlockSize on the main chain by the looks of it.

In short, I'm as disappointed in me as you are.

I called it.

Quote
We're dealing with a management team that rejects as a matter of principle ANY accountability to stakeholders. It's fucking Divine Right of Kings. Do you think parliament could have forced King John to sign the Magna Carta without an army at their backs?  Our miners are looking pretty uncomfortable and out of place in their battle armor.]




3552. Post 13955245 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on February 20, 2016, 07:37:40 PM

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/bitcoin-roundtable-consensus-266d475a61ff#.jq3kwmpb5

It's better than the draft, but July 2017 is a very long wait.

Nothing concrete, just another delay. And a delay was all blockstream wanted.

"Bitcoin and its users can go fuck themselves" seems to be the only take away from this.

But  Blockstreams $76m is secure, so we can be thankful for that.

Yeah, a bunch of weasel words. "likely", "recommended".  The miners caved by ditching Classic.  They just gave up any leverage they have to actually enforce any of this.


Just a thought: If miners have the backbone of jellyfish, how secure is our network if the Chinese government "suggests" they cooperate in a 51% attack? 





3553. Post 13955426 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 20, 2016, 11:50:24 PM
...
Few people decide the future of 'Bitcoin'.... really decentralized , right ?

An unregulated currency money, created by & for people united by their unwavering faith in greed being a virtue?

What could possibly go wrong???

That's proof of stake, silly.

Proof of work is serious business, dontcha know?

There's a Russian book about NEP (1920s, after the revolution -- corrupt Soviet privatization program), and, just like today, there were shell corporations which served as facades for whatever_was_really_making_money. Anyhow, in this book they ran a firm called "Horns & Hooves," which had nothing to do with horns or hooves. In the back room, there were two barrels, a length of hose, and a hired boy. The boy's job was to put a full barrel up on the table, connect it with the length of a hose to the empty barrel below, and let the water gravity-siphon into the empty barrel. Once that was done, he simply moved the full barrel onto the table, the [now] empty one to the floor, and repeat the process ad infinitum.
Work.

If barrel-siphoning was a requirement for making entries in a distributed ledger, than this would be a useful analogy.

If a [trustless] distributed ledger was as useful as some would have you believe, it *wouldn't* be a useful analogy.
The point being, is it really *useful* to burn $1 of electricity & buy a dollar's worth of gear to make a $2 bill? And I don't mean "earn $2," literally make $2 bill, to go into circulation, which you could have printed for pennies.

Is it worth it to make the two dollar bill? No.

Is it worth it to provide a mechanism for creating, distributing, transferring and accounting for that two dollar bill for the next 40+ years? On a global scale? Providing trusted means of settlement between antagonistic nations? Whilst preventing any means of counterfeiting? Huh Yes.

counterfeiting like double spending? Which you can do if you control 51% of the network like the Chinese do?



3554. Post 13955454 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Let's look at Adam's poll: 79 percent support the compromise. Totally too small of a samples size, but just for shits and giggles, let's assume that is representative. 75% is NOT consensus, but 79% is?






3555. Post 13955548 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 12:13:38 AM

You gotta trust somebody Sad
Right. with bitcoin I need to trust the integrity of the blockchain, that the record has not been tampered with. I can verify this myself, and I can cross-verify with several thousand other nodes across the network.

In a fiat transaction I need to trust the government and central bank, which do not have a great track record over the last hundred years. When was the last time the federal reserve was audited?



With Bitcoin you only have to trust the government and central bank of China.  Chinese miners caved to core. You think they wouldn't cave to their own government? 




3556. Post 13955746 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 12:26:34 AM

You gotta trust somebody Sad
Right. with bitcoin I need to trust the integrity of the blockchain, that the record has not been tampered with. I can verify this myself, and I can cross-verify with several thousand other nodes across the network.

In a fiat transaction I need to trust the government and central bank, which do not have a great track record over the last hundred years. When was the last time the federal reserve was audited?



With Bitcoin you only have to trust the government and central bank of China.  Chinese miners caved to core. You think they wouldn't cave to their own government? 



I'm certain they would capitulate to their government. If they try to make a change or otherwise manipulate transactions their blocks will be rejected and we will fork.

Why can you not understand censorship resistance?

Maybe you can help me understand. So we fork, but we would have to fork away from SHA256 or they could just point to the new fork and doublespend again, right?

Forking seems to be a last resort thing, and there is no code or plan in place to make that kind of switch, to say nothing of no hashpower to secure the new fork, so it could take weeks or months and in the meantime, no Bitcoin.  During that time, could not the Chinese easily discover our new hashing algorithm and swamp the hashpools with more doublespending?

So please, explain this censorship resistance. How is this not a vulnerability?



3557. Post 13955841 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Bitcoin: distributed decentralized money secured by cowardly miners concentrated in China.  There is no plan or code to switch security measures if they get compromised.

Awesome. This is where I keep my life savings.  I'm a fucking genius.



3558. Post 13955923 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 01:06:14 AM

You gotta trust somebody Sad
Right. with bitcoin I need to trust the integrity of the blockchain, that the record has not been tampered with. I can verify this myself, and I can cross-verify with several thousand other nodes across the network.

In a fiat transaction I need to trust the government and central bank, which do not have a great track record over the last hundred years. When was the last time the federal reserve was audited?



With Bitcoin you only have to trust the government and central bank of China.  Chinese miners caved to core. You think they wouldn't cave to their own government?  



I'm certain they would capitulate to their government. If they try to make a change or otherwise manipulate transactions their blocks will be rejected and we will fork.

Why can you not understand censorship resistance?

Maybe you can help me understand. So we fork, but we would have to fork away from SHA256 or they could just point to the new fork and doublespend again, right?

Forking seems to be a last resort thing, and there is no code or plan in place to make that kind of switch, to say nothing of no hashpower to secure the new fork, so it could take weeks or months and in the meantime, no Bitcoin.  During that time, could not the Chinese easily discover our new hashing algorithm and swamp the hashpools with more doublespending?

So please, explain this censorship resistance. How is this not a vulnerability?

Censorship resistance comes from the fact that change cannot be forced upon the bitcoin network. Anyone who refuses to accept the new blocks will simply do so and continue on their merry way. You can only double-spend bitcoin that you control. The people that are actually using bitcoin will simply continue to use bitcoin. Any strange blocks or attempt to re-write the blockchain will simply be ignored.

The fork is not last resort, the fork will happen as soon as the first block is formed that does not conform with the consensus rules.  

The network is secured by HASHPOWER! is this not obvious?  Does someone have a warehouse full of SHA512 ASICs laying around to secure the new fork if our hashpower gets compromised?

Even if it is, we can write the code for this new fork in 10 minutes? Convince everyone to use it (because convincing people of the need to upgrade is so damn easy).  I feel like the only sane guy in a loony bin!

or Inigo Montoya.

What is this term "censorship resistance?" I do not think it means what you think it means.



3559. Post 13955972 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: molecular on February 21, 2016, 01:09:34 AM
Bitcoin: distributed decentralized money secured by cowardly miners concentrated in China.  There is no plan or code to switch security measures if they get compromised.

Awesome. This is where I keep my life savings.  I'm a fucking genius.

I've always assumed a majority of economically driven, rational miners.

Maybe that assumption is flawed.


So what happens when Bitcoin's market cap gets big enough to interfere with Chinese economic and monetary policy?  It would be naive to think they WOULDN'T compromise our security, if they had the means motive and opportunity to do so, which they do.

Miners are just people out trying to make a buck.  If they get threatened by the State, they will help launch a 51% attack, because it's the economically driven rational thing to do in that situation.




3560. Post 13956009 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 01:26:01 AM

You gotta trust somebody Sad
Right. with bitcoin I need to trust the integrity of the blockchain, that the record has not been tampered with. I can verify this myself, and I can cross-verify with several thousand other nodes across the network.

In a fiat transaction I need to trust the government and central bank, which do not have a great track record over the last hundred years. When was the last time the federal reserve was audited?



With Bitcoin you only have to trust the government and central bank of China.  Chinese miners caved to core. You think they wouldn't cave to their own government?  



I'm certain they would capitulate to their government. If they try to make a change or otherwise manipulate transactions their blocks will be rejected and we will fork.

Why can you not understand censorship resistance?

Maybe you can help me understand. So we fork, but we would have to fork away from SHA256 or they could just point to the new fork and doublespend again, right?

Forking seems to be a last resort thing, and there is no code or plan in place to make that kind of switch, to say nothing of no hashpower to secure the new fork, so it could take weeks or months and in the meantime, no Bitcoin.  During that time, could not the Chinese easily discover our new hashing algorithm and swamp the hashpools with more doublespending?

So please, explain this censorship resistance. How is this not a vulnerability?

Censorship resistance comes from the fact that change cannot be forced upon the bitcoin network. Anyone who refuses to accept the new blocks will simply do so and continue on their merry way. You can only double-spend bitcoin that you control. The people that are actually using bitcoin will simply continue to use bitcoin. Any strange blocks or attempt to re-write the blockchain will simply be ignored.

The fork is not last resort, the fork will happen as soon as the first block is formed that does not conform with the consensus rules.  

The network is secured by HASHPOWER! is this not obvious?  Does someone have a warehouse full of SHA512 ASICs laying around to secure the new fork if our hashpower gets compromised?

Even if it is, we can write the code for this new fork in 10 minutes? Convince everyone to use it (because convincing people of the need to upgrade is so damn easy).  I feel like the only sane guy in a loony bin!

or Inigo Montoya.

What is this term "censorship resistance?" I do not think it means what you think it means.


Yo, Dumbass, how much hashpower do you control? Zero? Ok then.

Shut up slave, you have no say in this. (Thank goodness)

Just sell all your coins and leave already. There, I've said it twice, I won't say it again.

(* how you like my version of whiny rage-quit? *)

So your response is to call me a dumbass? That doesn't seem like a real answer. Do you have a logical answer to my concerns?  Does anybody?

There is a difference between Bitcoin being uncensored and being censorship resistant. We are currently uncensored, but at the mercy of a government that will not allow banks in that country to even hold bitcoin accounts or allow their citizens to do anything with this currency except speculate on it.  This is not exactly a huge selling point. 



3561. Post 13956151 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 01:49:59 AM
So your response is to call me a dumbass? That doesn't seem like a real answer. Do you have a logical answer to my concerns?  Does anybody?

There is a difference between Bitcoin being uncensored and being censorship resistant. We are currently uncensored, but at the mercy of a government that will not allow banks in that country to even hold bitcoin accounts or allow their citizens to do anything with this currency except speculate on it.  This is not exactly a huge selling point.  

Yes, you're a dumbass. Bitcoin exists not at the mercy of some gov't, bitcoin exists despite gov't or malicious actors.

Simple example for you: Alice wants to send money to Bob, but China won't allow it. China owns 90 percent of hash power so China is able to delay the transaction for nine out of ten blocks, but eventually the transaction goes through and Bob gets paid. It took 90 minutes instead of 10 minutes but still 3 days faster than bank ( actually, China controls 100% of bank, so... Yeah, that's censorship resistance.)

I see that, but that's not my concern. Someone with >50% hashpower can double spend. or tripple spend, or senf the same BTC to 12 different exchanges and sell it, crashing the price to pennies while still mining NEW bitcoins which they spend twelve times keeping the price there.

We can always pick a point in the past where there is concensus that a double spend hasn't happened yet and freeze the blockchain there until we fix the double spending problem.  I agree with that. What I don't think you are considering is that the fix may take months to get everyone to agree on the same fix and implement it IF it can be done at all.  In the mean time, your "store of value" plummets to the purchasing power of bellybutton lint. 

We would need:
Protocol change
hardware
code
agreement

You could be right. I may be a dumbass. If I am, someone please tell me why.




3562. Post 13956219 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 02:07:33 AM
billyjoeallen is high on fiat. ( oh wait he shorted not sold Undecided )

My short is a hedge. I'm longer on bitcoin that almost everybody here, and I am very uncomfortable with that.



3563. Post 13956327 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 02:17:22 AM


You can only double-spend your own coins (second time I told you this) exchanges typically require ass'y least 3 confirmations,  which means at 50% you'd essentially need to win 4 coin flips in a row  (3 to trick the exchange and the 4th to double-spend the coins) - which means you would only succeed in this attack 6.25 % of the time. Also, if this type of attack became common, exchanges would start to simply wait for 4,5,6 transactions or more...


Yeah, but China has ~75% hashpower, not 50%.  winning three bets in a row with 75% odds is a 42% chance, a heluva lot higher than 6.25% and I'm pretty sure the miners who get nationalized keep a good size pile of coins that could be double spent.  Even if they don't, The Chicoms could nationalize the Chinese exchanges too and then they have coins up the wazzu to dump. 

freshly mined coins can't be spent right away. I get that. What I'm saying is that doesn't matter in a well-executed 51% attack, because you can also verify bogus transactions.  If I was an evil Chinese Official, I could execute this attack with no more expertise than I now currently hold just by pointing guns at the right people. 






3564. Post 13956470 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Brian Armstrong: Too little, too late.

https://medium.com/@barmstrong/the-bitcoin-roundtable-consensus-proposal-too-little-too-late-e694f13f40b#.csoenxl65

There has been an agreement. That agreement may lead to a consensus, but that agreement is not in itself consensus.  As smallblockers constantly remind us,  even supermajority support is not sufficient.

I suggest people who want this agreement or larger blocks in general to continue running Classic nodes as a means of holding Core's feet to the fire, or start running one if you haven't.  An unenforceable agreement is meaningless. Those classic nodes are what brought Core to the negotiating table.  They will keep them honest.






3565. Post 13956527 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 03:01:16 AM


You can only double-spend your own coins (second time I told you this) exchanges typically require ass'y least 3 confirmations,  which means at 50% you'd essentially need to win 4 coin flips in a row  (3 to trick the exchange and the 4th to double-spend the coins) - which means you would only succeed in this attack 6.25 % of the time. Also, if this type of attack became common, exchanges would start to simply wait for 4,5,6 transactions or more...


Yeah, but China has ~75% hashpower, not 50%.  winning three bets in a row with 75% odds is a 42% chance, a heluva lot higher than 6.25% and I'm pretty sure the miners who get nationalized keep a good size pile of coins that could be double spent.  Even if they don't, The Chicoms could nationalize the Chinese exchanges too and then they have coins up the wazzu to dump. 

freshly mined coins can't be spent right away. I get that. What I'm saying is that doesn't matter in a well-executed 51% attack, because you can also verify bogus transactions.  If I was an evil Chinese Official, I could execute this attack with no more expertise than I now currently hold just by pointing guns at the right people. 

Ok new bja, since you're so nice and polite:

First: you need to win 4 in a row to double spend if the exchange requires 3 confirmations, and even if you succeed once, the exchanges will just start to ask for more confirmations if they are becoming victims of attacks. (I've explained this twice now, it seems you're not even trying)

Second: I never mentioned freshly mined coins, everyone knows you need 120 confirmations to spend newly issued coins.

Third: you cannot "verify bogus transactions" - any honest node on the network will identify and reject a bogus transaction.

Are you a bot? Or just a noob?

Go easy, Pal. I'm asking questions.  So an exchange can change requirements AFTER an attack has already happened. How much damage can be done before then?  Catastrophic damage.  Like the Mt.Gox hack of 2011 that sent the price from $32 to $2 and stayed there for a year. 

Also, there are MILLIONS of coins on Chinese exchanges that the Chicoms can gain the access to anytime they want.  This may seem like a different issue, but a coordinated crackdown in China wouldn't leave the exchanges alone.  Bitcoin activity in China presents a single point of failure and a security vulnerability. Surely you can see this.  Are you suggesting that it WON'T happen or that it CAN'T happen?



3566. Post 13957021 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 03:52:07 AM

4: I understand that China currently holds a controlling interest in bitcoin. If they do anything crazy that would compromise bitcoin (like proposing an 8mb increase, and then doubling till 8GB) then we can worry, but as you can see with the current debate, it is not easy to co-opt bitcoin.


If China holds controlling interest, then China holds control. Bitcoin isn't a honey badger anymore. It's a panda bear. 

We can disagree on blocksize or even the vision for Bitcoin's future, but nobody wants hashpower concentrated in one political jurisdiction. Hashpower secures Bitcoin. If the hashpower isn't secure, then neither is Bitcoin.

What's worse is that there is no way to fix this without massively increasing mining outside of China, which isn't economically viable without an electricity cost parity or advantage. 






3567. Post 13957261 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 06:06:07 AM

4: I understand that China currently holds a controlling interest in bitcoin. If they do anything crazy that would compromise bitcoin (like proposing an 8mb increase, and then doubling till 8GB) then we can worry, but as you can see with the current debate, it is not easy to co-opt bitcoin.

If China holds controlling interest, then China holds control. Bitcoin isn't a honey badger anymore. It's a panda bear. 
We can disagree on blocksize or even the vision for Bitcoin's future, but nobody wants hashpower concentrated in one political jurisdiction. Hashpower secures Bitcoin. If the hashpower isn't secure, then neither is Bitcoin.
What's worse is that there is no way to fix this without massively increasing mining outside of China, which isn't economically viable without an electricity cost parity or advantage. 

It is funny, how you fear the Chinese. BTW, Chinese are much more strongly defensive of their right to have paper money. They would never roll over and accept gov't controlled money accounts like they're doing in Europe. As if having the majority of hash power in the country that has the majority of the world population is somehow a problem. And yet the U.S.is actually the most repressive country on earth. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/19/apple-fbi-encryption-battle-san-bernardino-shooting-syed-farook-iphone

What exactly is your agenda, new BJA?

The Chinese government is somewhat hostile towards Bitcoin and freedom in general.
In China, it is illegal to:

buy bitcoin or sell bitcoin with a bank account
trade goods and services for bitcoin

They have strong capital controls which we know Bitcoin can be used to evade.
They have a history of cracking down on freedom movements (Tiananmen Square massacre)
They have a history of nationalizing industries
They are in the midst of an economic downturn that could easily turn into a recession
They have economic and monetary policies that will be difficult to enforce if bitcoin achieves a substantially higher market cap.

Long story short, there's no way Bitcoin can grow without achieving more Government and PBoC hostility.

There's no way bitcoin can grow without more network congestion. 

Taken together, it means Bitcoin is a suborbital vehicle and the moon is not reachable.



3568. Post 13957851 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: rebuilder on February 21, 2016, 07:42:53 AM
Shmadz, BJA: to comment on double spend risks. You both seem to have missed some details.

Yeah, but China has ~75% hashpower, not 50%.  winning three bets in a row with 75% odds is a 42% chance, a heluva lot higher than 6.25%

If you have 75% of the hashrate, your success rate with double-spends is 100%, since you are guaranteed to be building the longest chain. Sure, 25% of the blocks will not be built by you, but you have the power to discard those from the blockchain. I'd guess a double-spend in this kind of scenario would probably be best achieved by willingly orphaning the blocks containing the tx  you want to re-spend. So the situation, if you assume Chinese miners are all in collusion, is actually worse than BJA is saying.

OTOH, honest miners aren't the only protection against double spends. simple race attacks can be detected by any sufficiently connected node. That won't help against dishonest miners, but the kind of attack a majority miner could pull off seems pretty problematic in terms of financial gains. The attack would be detected too quickly for the miner to exchange their BTC for other assets and take delivery of said assets, so any profits would be counted in BTC. And what do yout think happens to the BTC price if a majority miner goes rogue?


I'm not suggesting miners are or could be or want to collude. It's in their best interest not to do that unless...they are coerced by the government, Communist Party or central bank.  My concern is that 75% hashpower in the same POLITICAL jurisdiction (not where most people live) threatens censorship resistance.
Nothing anyone has said changes that.

I know the U.S. has suppressed voices of dissent, but in modern times we've had nothing like the Tienanmen Square Massacre. There are levels of Statist evil. Still, I don't want to defend myself or my country, both of whom merit legitimate criticism because it changes the subject.
The issue, no matter how badly everyone wants to ignore it is the Bitcoin is centralized now, not in a way we predicted or worried about, but centralized all the same.  I would have the same objection if mining was concentrated here, but probably not as strongly. Mining cannot be concentrated in ANY one political boundary without compromising censorship resistance.

If we can at least agree on that, we can talk about what to do about it, but ignoring it, changing the subject, making personal attacks is not constructive. This is a real problem.




Scmadz seems to think I'm an agent or something, but i usually don't respond to ridiculous attacks. This one has been repeated many times, so no Dude. It's still me.  



3569. Post 13957918 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: DaRude on February 21, 2016, 08:14:51 AM
Shmadz, BJA: to comment on double spend risks. You both seem to have missed some details.

Yeah, but China has ~75% hashpower, not 50%.  winning three bets in a row with 75% odds is a 42% chance, a heluva lot higher than 6.25%

If you have 75% of the hashrate, your success rate with double-spends is 100%, since you are guaranteed to be building the longest chain. Sure, 25% of the blocks will not be built by you, but you have the power to discard those from the blockchain. I'd guess a double-spend in this kind of scenario would probably be best achieved by willingly orphaning the blocks containing the tx  you want to re-spend. So the situation, if you assume Chinese miners are all in collusion, is actually worse than BJA is saying.

OTOH, honest miners aren't the only protection against double spends. simple race attacks can be detected by any sufficiently connected node. That won't help against dishonest miners, but the kind of attack a majority miner could pull off seems pretty problematic in terms of financial gains. The attack would be detected too quickly for the miner to exchange their BTC for other assets and take delivery of said assets, so any profits would be counted in BTC. And what do yout think happens to the BTC price if a majority miner goes rogue?


I'm not suggesting miners are or could be or want to collude. It's in their best interest not to do that unless...they are coerced by the government, Communist Party or central bank.  My concern is that 75% hashpower in the same POLITICAL jurisdiction (not where most people live) threatens censorship resistance.
Nothing anyone has said changes that.

I know the U.S. has suppressed voices of dissent, but in modern times we've had nothing like the Tienanmen Square Massacre. There are levels of Statist evil. Still, I don't want to defend myself or my country, both of whom merit legitimate criticism because it changes the subject.
The issue, no matter how badly everyone wants to ignore it is the Bitcoin is centralized now, not in a way we predicted or worried about, but centralized all the same.  

If we can at least agree on that, we can talk about what to do about it, but ignoring it, changing the subject, making personal attacks is not constructive. This is a real problem.




Scmadz seems to think I'm an agent or something, but i usually don't respond to reficulous attacks. This one has been repeated many times, so no Dude. It's still me.  

Keep creating bigger blocks 16MB make things less centralized right?

see, that's exactly what I mean about changing the subject.  It means you don't have an answer.



3570. Post 13958140 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

China is leading this rally because they think this roundtable agreement means we have consensus. That is far from certain. I'm thinking the main sticking point with Core will be/is:

1. getting boxed into a time frame, even an extraordinarily accommodating one.
2. no pledge to stick with Core even if they renege.

Bigblockers seem to all be smart enough to know that this is Core's deal to blow. We'll take the deal. But if Core Doesn't take it too even though they basically won,  then we go to war and it will be Core against the world. Everyone will know who the bad guys are. Smallblockers will lose.

I kinda hope they don't take it.  This was a last ditch effort on the part of miners to keep Core in the loop for the sake of market stability.  I care less about market stability than an end to the Divine Right of Kings.  

You got nowhere to go, Smallblockers. Take the deal or we will bury you.




3571. Post 13958205 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 08:41:45 AM

Scmadz


Yeah, not even close.

Hey Billy, why don't you tell us about your job and where you live, if it won't take you too much time to search the back history of the account you bought?

You don't even know if you're a big blocker, or a small blocker, do you?

I'm a firefighter who lives in the swamp. I put dollar bills in your mom's G string.

How you like them Big Blocks?



3572. Post 13958497 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 09:05:23 AM
China is leading this rally because they think this roundtable agreement means we have consensus. That is far from certain. I'm thinking the main sticking point with Core will be/is:

1. getting boxed into a time frame, even an extraordinarily accommodating one.
2. no pledge to stick with Core even if they renege.

Bigblockers seem to all be smart enough to know that this is Core's deal to blow. We'll take the deal. But if Core Doesn't take it too even though they basically won,  then we go to war and it will be Core against the world. Everyone will know who the bad guys are. Smallblockers will lose.

I kinda hope they don't take it.  This was a last ditch effort on the part of miners to keep Core in the loop for the sake of market stability.  I care less about market stability than an end to the Divine Right of Kings.  

You got nowhere to go, Smallblockers. Take the deal or we will bury you.



All right, that's more like it. Welcome back asshole. How much do they pay you to hijack your account for the evening?

You crack me up, schmadzi. 1MB4EVA is dead. Killed by Adam Back of all people.  What's the weather like down there under the bus?  Now let's see how Maxwell and the other Prima Donna's like getting pushed around by the help.






3573. Post 13958602 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 21, 2016, 09:41:37 AM
China is leading this rally because they think this roundtable agreement means we have consensus. That is far from certain. I'm thinking the main sticking point with Core will be/is:

1. getting boxed into a time frame, even an extraordinarily accommodating one.
2. no pledge to stick with Core even if they renege.

Bigblockers seem to all be smart enough to know that this is Core's deal to blow. We'll take the deal. But if Core Doesn't take it too even though they basically won,  then we go to war and it will be Core against the world. Everyone will know who the bad guys are. Smallblockers will lose.

I kinda hope they don't take it.  This was a last ditch effort on the part of miners to keep Core in the loop for the sake of market stability.  I care less about market stability than an end to the Divine Right of Kings.  

You got nowhere to go, Smallblockers. Take the deal or we will bury you.



All right, that's more like it. Welcome back asshole. How much do they pay you to hijack your account for the evening?

You crack me up, schmadzi. 1MB4EVA is dead. Killed by Adam Back of all people.  What's the weather like down there under the bus?  Now let's see how Maxwell and the other Prima Donna's like getting pushed around by the help.


Back was never the droid you were looking for.

The real antagonist will be Popescu.

Good luck in phase two of implementing your fail fork.

Buddy, every miner knows that the more hashpower you have on your side, the less luck you need.




3574. Post 13958785 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on February 21, 2016, 10:00:52 AM
Coin



Explanation


look at those full blocks! but it's ok, we'll have some more room sometime in the middle of next year.




3575. Post 13958926 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: bitebits on February 21, 2016, 10:21:52 AM

look at those full blocks! but it's ok, we'll have some more room sometime in the middle of next year.



BJA, are you still short? This seems the moment for the market to catch some breath (testing 3000 CNY).

I think 3000 will be breached, everyone will celebrate thinking this is a whole new paradigm, and then the bottom will fall out. $3.8 million in new leveraged longs on BFX leaves nothing but air under a serious test of support.






3576. Post 13958968 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: becoin on February 21, 2016, 10:29:20 AM
look at those full blocks! but it's ok, we'll have some more room sometime in the middle of next year.
I've never had any delays or other issues sending bitcoins. What is your problem with full blocks?

The same problem I have flying coach. No elbow room.



3577. Post 13959032 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on February 21, 2016, 10:38:59 AM
look at those full blocks! but it's ok, we'll have some more room sometime in the middle of next year.
I've never had any delays or other issues sending bitcoins. What is your problem with full blocks?
Paying the suggested fee of 5000 satoshi per KB everything gets confirmed pretty soon. Haven't had any delays in a long time: miners need to be paid.

Miners get paid 25 BTC per block. if half a million people want to send some coin on the same day, they can't all do it, no matter how high the fees are.  Higher fees kill marginal transactions. marginal transactions are where the growth comes from, and it's where death comes from.



3578. Post 13959066 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: becoin on February 21, 2016, 10:49:55 AM
look at those full blocks! but it's ok, we'll have some more room sometime in the middle of next year.
I've never had any delays or other issues sending bitcoins. What is your problem with full blocks?

The same problem I have flying coach. No elbow room.
If you want elbow room fly business class and pay higher fees. Simple! Isn't it?

That's why I don't fly at all. Are you starting to get it? This "let them eat cake" thing is really cute. Worked out great for Marie Antoinette.



3579. Post 13959139 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on February 21, 2016, 11:00:11 AM
look at those full blocks! but it's ok, we'll have some more room sometime in the middle of next year.
I've never had any delays or other issues sending bitcoins. What is your problem with full blocks?
Paying the suggested fee of 5000 satoshi per KB everything gets confirmed pretty soon. Haven't had any delays in a long time: miners need to be paid.

Miners get paid 25 BTC per block. if hald a million people want to send some coin on the same day, they can't all do it, no matter how high the fees are.  Higher fees kill marginal transactions. marginal transactions are where the growth comes from.

I think you know that btc was never designed for those high numbers: this is it right now if I am to use btc I need to pay that fee.
If we grow in numbers then I really don't know what's gonna happen.
This was never designed as a world currency

We don't even have the capacity to be the currency for a single medium-sized city.  If BTC price doubles faster than blockrewardss halves, we would never need to worry about miner compensation. No fees would ever be necessary, but that won't happen unless capacity also doubles faster.



3580. Post 13959204 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: becoin on February 21, 2016, 11:13:53 AM
look at those full blocks! but it's ok, we'll have some more room sometime in the middle of next year.
I've never had any delays or other issues sending bitcoins. What is your problem with full blocks?

The same problem I have flying coach. No elbow room.
If you want elbow room fly business class and pay higher fees. Simple! Isn't it?

That's why I don't fly at all. Are you starting to get it?
It is your problem and nobody else's. The business of airports, airlines and airplane manufacturers is booming! Are you starting to get it?

You really think so? Have you taken a look at the Boeing stock chart lately?



3581. Post 13962162 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46po4l/we_have_consensus_in_april_we_get_sw_3_months/d082hi8

This is what I predicted. The holdout elements in Core object to the very IDEA of political compromise because they see it as a betrayal of engineering principles.  This plays right into bigblocker hands, of course, because Now the miners will know what we have been dealing with all this time. Smallblockers will not compromise. ever. The only option is to route around the roadblock with Classic or something like it.

The sane elements in core know that they are in danger of getting left behind by the "economic majority" and they will concede and agree to the Roundtable agreement. So Core is split. That's good news. it's what we wanted. Divide and Conquer.

Now instead of Core against the world, it's half of core against the world.  The purists smallblockers will win because there is bias for the status quo in their governance model. They will win the battle and lose the war.

Core will reject the agreement and the miners will reject Core.  Classic comes out on top.

Cheap coins ahead!






3582. Post 13962917 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Core developers honestly and sincerely want to write the best code. What the Core developers don't understand is that the best code doesn't win. The code that gives people the best value wins. It's why Microsoft beat Apple in the 1980s.  MSDOS was shit code, but it was free.  We used it.

Core is effectively wanting to charge for their code with miner fees. They aren't really miner fees, they're Core fees. Miners have made it clear they don't want them, they would rather have blockrewards of a rapidly appreciating currency.

The market always has the last word. The market wants value.  We don't want a luxury network of highest level security. A luxury is by definition something you don't need. With mining concentrated in China, highest level security isn't possible anyway.   




3583. Post 13963228 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on February 21, 2016, 05:52:03 PM

lol! now friedenbach threatens with a change of PoW.

seems like some part of core is really decisive about being left behind by the community.

It's like a fucking kindergarten.

Although I am no Friedenbach fanboi, I think we agree on this:

Quote from: maaku7

I feel this meeting was antithetical to Bitcoin and no good outcomes were likely

Anyone who still labours under the misapprehension that the roundtable  was a good thing for bitcoin needs to re-examine their understanding of Bitcoin,

you see, in bitcoin we have only one real built in way to reach consensus, its PoW. apart from that we simply have no way of knowing what the community/economy/... wants. so basically you will always have to have meetups and there will always be somebody who wasnt there. we cant have an election like in other systems. and we cant have a survey that would lead to comprehensive results. we cant have one stake = one vote either.


But its when that chance of PoW is denied that we start t get into problems. That is the true sedition within Bitcoin. It is supposed to be resistant to this, and if left to its own devices it will prove to be so (or not, in which case it will die).

The denial of due process  by organising closed door meetings, where only one side of the argument is presented ( with infantile Powerpoint presentations), is more harmful than any contentious fork.  

I think I hear what you are saying. Hashpower secures the network, so a Coup by miners turns Bitcoin into a military dictatorship.  That's true, but it's actually the best option we have right now.  Without that hashpower, Bitcoin will lose it's first mover advantage. 

Forking to a different POW algorithm will leave Bitcoin massively open to attacks until we can regain a fraction of that hashpower security.  We're dead in the water. Damned if we do. Damned if we don't. 



3584. Post 13963298 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on February 21, 2016, 06:00:49 PM



Explanation


Coins are moving! what are the chances that those coins are moving to exchanges where they will be dumped on the heads of overoptimistic bulls?  



3585. Post 13963543 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Lavos on February 21, 2016, 06:16:45 PM

Coins are moving! what are the chances that those coins are moving to exchanges where they will be dumped on the heads of overoptimistic bulls?  

Coins always are moving, we have a couple of transactions/second, what is special with this moves?

What is special is that the network is approaching capacity in the middle of a scaling controversy. Which side do you think that helps? It's a slow growth deal, but if it gets accepted, there will be fast growth and the network will clog.  What do you think a jammed up network will do to confidence and price?

It's a no win situation and the smart money is sitting on the sidelines watching it play out.  That little correction this morning wasn't the Big Dump. The Big dump will happen over CNY3000 when everyone thinks the coast is clear.



3586. Post 13963712 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on February 21, 2016, 06:23:37 PM
Good morning Bitcoinland. Seems I missed a little drama last night.

I leave to go out for Saturday night with the price hovering around  $440, make it home this afternoon and it's $436. That's not surprising.

What is surprising is that it went all the way up to $451 and then all the way down to $428 before ending right back where it was yesterday.

Meanwhile some people around here are acting as if the price had crashed. NLC is posting Tinkerball pix and Abercrombie is asking if crypto is dead.

Silly little bears. Sigh.



A while ago, they were worth $465. Before that $502. Before that they were worth $1100.  How many times do you think we're gonna fall for this crap? I'm not selling, but I sure as hell ain't buying either. not at these prices.  



3587. Post 13964310 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

http://bitcoinist.net/core-devs-and-classic-adopters-alike-disagree-with-roundtable-resolutions/

Do you think this article has been translated into Chinese yet?



3588. Post 13964414 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on February 21, 2016, 08:10:21 PM

The lawyers fees have eaten away a quarter of the funds already and they are stretching their investigation out forever. After the final lawyers fee has been paid there will probably only be enough left to buy a bag of jelly beans. What can you buy with the price of the one jelly bean each person will probably get back?

I sure hope that ain't the case. Is that documented somewhere? Surely there are some type of rules about how much ends up in admin pockets?

Yes, but the rules are written by lawyers. Most of those coins will be sold off to pay the lawyers, who have an incentive to charge as many administrative fees as possible. It's like having a silk road auction series all over again.  Bearish.



3589. Post 13967103 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 21, 2016, 10:50:19 PM
make note of anyone loudly expressing frustration with this agreement and actively trying to stop it

its likely they are stupid.

FFS

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1372397.0

strongly recommend moving your BTC out of coinbase
do not trust these spot light loving restarts, and show them your disuse for actively trying to stop what little progress we FINALLY have made, by leaving them.
if you leave coins on coinbase, you are supporting, another year of bitching and nothing getting done while bitcoin bleeds.

I think it was a bad move on the part of Armstrong. We need the miners on the big block side and opposing their deal alienates them.  He's right though that we still need to run our Classic nodes but as a deal enforcement mechanism. You know damn well Core will renege if we don't have leverage on them.

I'm just wondering how Back is going to sell this to the true believers without have them ragequit.  They see themselves as making a principled stand on engineering integrity. They are, but they also don't understand that it doesn't matter.  A top security network isn't possible as long as majority hashpower is concentrated in China.  A value network, not a quality network is our only option.



3590. Post 13967207 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 22, 2016, 02:14:06 AM
make note of anyone loudly expressing frustration with this agreement and actively trying to stop it

its likely they are stupid.

FFS

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1372397.0

strongly recommend moving your BTC out of coinbase
do not trust these spot light loving restarts, and show them your disuse for actively trying to stop what little progress we FINALLY have made, by leaving them.
if you leave coins on coinbase, you are supporting, another year of bitching and nothing getting done while bitcoin bleeds.

I think it was a bad move on the part of Armstrong. We need the miners on the big block side and opposing their deal alienates them.  He's right though that we still need to run our Classic nodes but as a deal enforcement mechanism. You know damn well Core will renege if we don't have leverage on them.

I'm just wondering how Back is going to sell this to the true believers without have them ragequit.  They see themselves as making a principled stand on engineering integrity. They are, but they also don't understand that it doesn't matter.  A top security network isn't possible as long as majority hashpower is concentrated in China.  A value network, not a quality network is our only option.

now we fully understand why we need at least 1 competing impl.

Competing implementations that didn't threaten to break the protocol would be nice.

Am I asking too much?

Yes. An empty threat is worthless. 



3591. Post 13967262 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 22, 2016, 02:22:32 AM
The threat would be the change in management. Seems like that ought to be enough.

There is going to be a change in management no matter what. Wladimir's insistence on near unanimity means Core will not ratify this agreement under current rules. If they stick with the rules, Core itself is out on it's ass. 

Blocks are full now. This needs to happen toot sweet or we face either stagnation or network congestion failure.  Core had time to deal wit this. they squandered it.  Now they are under the gun and have no one to blame but themselves. 



3592. Post 13967286 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):





We've been getting full blocks all day.  Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.



3593. Post 13967295 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 22, 2016, 02:37:45 AM
The threat would be the change in management. Seems like that ought to be enough.

There is going to be a change in management no matter what. Wladimir's insistence on near unanimity means Core will not ratify this agreement under current rules. If they stick with the rules, Core itself is out on it's ass. 

Blocks are full now. This needs to happen toot sweet or we face either stagnation or network congestion failure.  Core had time to deal wit this. they squandered it.  Now they are under the gun and have no one to blame but themselves. 

Here's a thing: Core is working on things like confidential transactions and stealth BIP's. Do you think Armstrong and company have any interest in privacy?

Of course not, but scaling is more urgent. 



3594. Post 13967315 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 22, 2016, 02:39:36 AM




We've been getting full blocks all day.  Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

wheres brg444 when you need him

full blocks != end of the world

I agree, but it could = the end of this rally. Or every rally from here on out.



3595. Post 13967488 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 22, 2016, 02:58:53 AM




We've been getting full blocks all day.  Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

wheres brg444 when you need him

full blocks != end of the world

I agree, but it could = the end of this rally. Or every rally from here on out.

so long as the full blocks are temporary so is this effect
and speculation that it's only temporary should further reduce this effect.

the blocks are full, full of crap ... or else fees would be rising, crap doesn't crap for fees.

blocksize will go up when the technology allows for it.

Decreased bock-writing utility is supposed to make the price go up? How does that work?



3596. Post 13974543 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

There is still a huge amount of upward momentum in this market, judging by the moving averages.  The problem is, if we continue on this trajectory, blocks will fill first, then fees will double. Then fees will quadruple, octuple, etc. until even the mathematincally challenged pumpmonkeys start to extrapolate what this means. Even though fees are still cheap, they will be only so for a very short period of time.

we have the capacity for a half million active users at most. Even if we ALL go away and get replaced by high rollers doing drug deals or speculating on the halving or whatever, and even if SegWit almost doubles the capacity, then what? Things just stagnate until we go through another two year clusterfuck to kick the can again? Rinse and repeat?

and what if through some miracle we get through all of that with flying colors and market cap goes to 100 Billion. Do you think the PBoC and the Communist Party of China will be happy with that and just let it continue to grow?

I'm starting to think the best way for me to liquidate my stash is just to sell a coin a week for however many years it takes, regardless of whether the price goes up or down.  The objective of traders is to make money, of course, but the purpose of traders is SUPPOSED to be to function as liquidity providers who reduce volatility.

The problem as I see it is that the traders who make the biggest profit in this market actually create volatility, withholding liquidity when it is needed and dumping when the market is already crashing.  I may have made a fundamental miscalculation.  This could just be growing pains or this could be something endemic to disinflationary currency. 

What is SUPPOSED to happen according to economic theory is that as quantity of money creation decreases (halvings), velocity of money (transactions) is supposed to go up to compensate, maintaining the balance of MV=PQ.  This clearly cannot happen if scaling is slower than halvings.  Even if Core changes their own governance rules to ratify this roundtable agreement, scaling may be slower than halvings.   Sidechains, lighting network, etc are no substitute because they effectively trade Bitcon IOUs and not actual bitcoin. You get the same problem that the fiat world has: a fractional reserve money multiplier than can either run positive or negative and screw up the balance.  At some point, Bitcoin may hit stall speed and enter into an unrecoverable dive.  What scares the shit out of me is this may have already happened.  27 months since the ATH, we're trading at <50%. 

Somebody please tell me the error of my thinking, or a slow liquidation becomes a serious consideration. 





3597. Post 13975798 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on February 22, 2016, 07:31:08 PM
What is SUPPOSED to happen according to economic theory is that as quantity of money creation decreases (halvings), velocity of money (transactions) is supposed to go up to compensate, maintaining the balance of MV=PQ.  This clearly cannot happen if scaling is slower than halvings.  

Sidechains, lighting network, etc are no substitute because they effectively trade Bitcon IOUs and not actual bitcoin. You get the same problem that the fiat world has: a fractional reserve money multiplier than can either run positive or negative and screw up the balance.  

Somebody please tell me the error of my thinking, or a slow liquidation becomes a serious consideration.  
Apart from some other concerns you raise, which I think have merit, I would like to respond to 2 things where I believe you to be wrong:

1) I don't know where you get the assumption that the halvings are supposed to have an effect on velocity of money.  

2) I think bitcoins paid through LN are economically the same as on-chain transactions.  Yes you could describe it as some kind of IOU, but it is mathematically/informatically based on the same bitcoins, these bitcoins are "anchored", so you should treat these like regular bitcoins. It's not the same thing as a paper IOU (or a digital one) where the only "link" is the trust you have in the issuer of the IOU.

EDIT: actually, maybe LN might have some effect on money velocity in the future, by allowing (especially by machines) much more and faster transactions.

1) They don't effect the velocity (v). They effect the quantity (M).  So because MV=PQ, a decrease in M MUST be compensated by a proportional increase in V in order for the equation to balance out. If it doesn't, then either price or quantity (or both) on the other side must adjust.

2) yes, you could have some sort of "proof of burn" to prevent LN from operating as a fractional reserve and then you'd be right. Centralized third party actors could also have cryptographically proven 100% reserves (or less reserves, provided they honestly disclosed this). 

Adam is right. This is FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and doubt), but it is genuine fear, uncertainty and doubt.

Thanks, that does address at least one of my concerns.



3598. Post 13976074 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 22, 2016, 08:35:44 PM
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/i-m-a-former-green-beret-here-s-how-i-would-bring-down-bitcoin-1456165726

billyjoeallen (imposter account)
NotLambChop (and plethora of sockpups, currently blunderer, bargainbin)
BlindMayorBitcoin
aztecminer (imposter account)

I am the only person on this entire forum where my handle is my actual name. It is trivial to verify that I am not a sockpuppet or an impostor.  Yes, I talk my book. Who doesn't? I make my trading positions known more often than I think is wise.  In short, accusing me of not being me just makes you look foolish.

Thanks for the link. I think that is a very interesting article and I agree that a Rough Consensus attack may be ongoing, as I have said many times. 



3599. Post 13976997 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on February 22, 2016, 09:53:24 PM
What is SUPPOSED to happen according to economic theory is that as quantity of money creation decreases (halvings), velocity of money (transactions) is supposed to go up to compensate, maintaining the balance of MV=PQ.  This clearly cannot happen if scaling is slower than halvings.  

Sidechains, lighting network, etc are no substitute because they effectively trade Bitcon IOUs and not actual bitcoin. You get the same problem that the fiat world has: a fractional reserve money multiplier than can either run positive or negative and screw up the balance.  

Somebody please tell me the error of my thinking, or a slow liquidation becomes a serious consideration.  
Apart from some other concerns you raise, which I think have merit, I would like to respond to 2 things where I believe you to be wrong:

1) I don't know where you get the assumption that the halvings are supposed to have an effect on velocity of money.  

2) I think bitcoins paid through LN are economically the same as on-chain transactions.  Yes you could describe it as some kind of IOU, but it is mathematically/informatically based on the same bitcoins, these bitcoins are "anchored", so you should treat these like regular bitcoins. It's not the same thing as a paper IOU (or a digital one) where the only "link" is the trust you have in the issuer of the IOU.

EDIT: actually, maybe LN might have some effect on money velocity in the future, by allowing (especially by machines) much more and faster transactions.

1) They don't effect the velocity (v). They effect the quantity (M).  So because MV=PQ, a decrease in M MUST be compensated by a proportional increase in V in order for the equation to balance out. If it doesn't, then either price or quantity (or both) on the other side must adjust.

2) yes, you could have some sort of "proof of burn" to prevent LN from operating as a fractional reserve and then you'd be right. Centralized third party actors could also have cryptographically proven 100% reserves (or less reserves, provided they honestly disclosed this).  

Adam is right. This is FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and doubt), but it is genuine fear, uncertainty and doubt.

Thanks, that does address at least one of my concerns.
1) I still don't understand why you want prices to stay the same in this equation (and of course as lambie pointed out, the amount of money doesn't decrease, the rate of new money created slows down).  
2)why would you need to burn the btc?  I think you need to read about LN some more (actually so do I about the technical details, but I think I have most of the big picture down).  You are trading "spending rights" for actual bitcoins that are locked in a special transaction.  If you start of with 10 btc, after the payment channel closes, there will still be 10 btc.  During the use of the channel, there is only ever 10 btc worth being exchanged.  How on earth does this  resemble fractional reserve banking?

1) I want the price of goods (P) to go down relative to Bitcoin so Bitcoin's purchasing power goes up. I want the Quantity of goods and services available to purchase (q) to go up, so taken together, I want the left side of the equation to equal the right side, which of course it logically has to.  

If the rate of quantity increase goes down, then the rate of velocity increase needs to go up.  Get that? we are beyond algebra and into calculus, but scaling can't be diminishing or even constant, but needs to be accelerating  for the equation to balance out and for price to continually go down while quantity goes up.  

2) you need 100% proof of reserves, so if you are exchanging tokens on one network for tokens on another network, you can't still have the original tokens or you have more than you started with (x+1>x) so you have a money multiplier.

and Yes, I don't know enough about the LN to discuss technical details. I'm only talking what it NEEDS to be in order to prevent effectively fractional reserve banking. Like I said, I could be making a mistake somewhere, so I am not arguing that LN is a bad idea. I just have questions.

I think I also need to clarify two things, in order to be absolutely innocent of trolling accusations.

A) I am in favor of the round table agreement- not because I like the terms. I absolutely do not like the terms as I believe the scaling is too slow for the reason I explained above. I am in favor of the agreement because I think it will either result in a change in leadership or rules within Core (which I think is sorely needed), or it will result in loss of support for Core by the miners and therefor a change in leadership of code development from Core to something else, probably Classic.

B) Here's my position on the miners: More hashpower is not only good, but absolutely necessary in order for Bitcoin to maintain it's first mover advantage over competing coins or potentially competing coins.  There is a huge danger in mining being concentrated in China as it creates a POSSIBLE central point of failure if there is (another) Chinese crackdown.  So if we can't get rid of the miners and miners are concentrated in China, what is there to do to reacquire censorship resistance? Only one thing: Increase hashpower outside of China massively, and at a rate substantially faster than hashpower within China is growing. I have no idea how we are going to do that given China's cheaper electricity and labor.




3600. Post 13977237 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

In a way, the strongest arguments of smallblockers and bigblockers are strikingly similar:

Smallblockers: Nodes are cheap, but they will get exponentially more expensive as Bitcoin scales. This will eventually lead to centralization and a loss of one of Bitcoin's essential properties.

Bigblockers: transaction fees are cheap, but they will get exponentially more expensive as bitcoin grows. This will eventually lead to a competitive disadvantage for our network.

The difference as I see it is that nodes will only get exponentially more expensive with regard to harddrive space and bandwidth, not in Bitcoin or even fiat terms. As harddrive space and bandwidth are both getting less expensive, the argument, while valid, is less of a problem than exponentially higher fees. This is especially true because if bitcoin goes up in value, you are having to pay a greater amount of an increasingly expensive resource.




3601. Post 13978565 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 23, 2016, 01:10:11 AM
World’s First Virtual Nation Constitution Released on Ethereum’s Blockchain
https://news.bitcoin.com/worlds-first-virtual-nation-constitution-released-ethereums-blockchain/
With the tough stuff like constitution all buttoned down, the remaining 3-5% left to do -- turning your imaginary country into a 4realsies one -- shouldn't take more than Two WeeksTM.

The United States didn't even have a Constitution until 1787 and it wasn't fully ratified for several more years.  You need a nation before you create rules to govern it.  These guys seems to not understand that.

Civilization only needs three laws.:
1. Respect people's self ownersip and property
2. Don't initiate or threaten violence.
3. Keep your promises.

You can make any rules you want, as long as they don't break those laws.  That's why I don't really see a need for a constitution. Anything more is too much. 




3602. Post 13978685 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

I wonder if the miners and pumpmonkeys understand that Adam Back and the other developers had no authority to negotiate on behalf of Core at the consensus toundtable, but only to make recommendations, develop code and present it to core for consideration of inclusion?

I further wonder if they understand that under current governance there is no way possible that these recommendations will be included in future versions of the Core client as any inclusion must be near unanimous, which these recommendations clearly won't be?

Core governance rules will change, Core leadership will change, both will change or nothing will change (other than the miner's support of Core, obviously). 




3603. Post 13985585 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Hunyadi on February 23, 2016, 07:34:16 AM
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/i-m-a-former-green-beret-here-s-how-i-would-bring-down-bitcoin-1456165726

billyjoeallen (imposter account)
NotLambChop (and plethora of sockpups, currently blunderer, bargainbin)
BlindMayorBitcoin
aztecminer (imposter account)

That's a very good read. It also could explain why this thread is becoming more and more toxic  Cry

Please read also this article (I really hope you do!):

http://joi.ito.com/weblog/2016/02/22/my-view-on-the-.html


I read it.  Core devs see themselves as artists, that is why they are uncompromising. True but superbearish. Like I said, the best code doesn't win. The best value code wins just like MSDOS beat AppleOS in the 19980s despite being crappy code.



3604. Post 13985684 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 23, 2016, 03:39:04 PM
years ago there was a manipulator with ~500,000Coins, he got #rect and so will this guy.




they rekt billyjoe shorts... i mean they killed kenny again .

No, they didn't rek my hedge yet. A hedge is a bet you want to lose, like buying life insurance.



3605. Post 13986020 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: harrymmmm on February 23, 2016, 09:39:50 AM
What is SUPPOSED to happen according to economic theory is that as quantity of money creation decreases (halvings), velocity of money (transactions) is supposed to go up to compensate, maintaining the balance of MV=PQ.  This clearly cannot happen if scaling is slower than halvings.  

Somebody please tell me the error of my thinking, or a slow liquidation becomes a serious consideration.  

Quote
1) They don't effect the velocity (v). They effect the quantity (M).  So because MV=PQ, a decrease in M MUST be compensated by a proportional increase in V in order for the equation to balance out. If it doesn't, then either price or quantity (or both) on the other side must adjust.

ok. I see where you're going wrong.

The equation of exchange is a real identity. So you can actually put anything you like in for those variables, but when you do, you get a certain interpretation of the rest.
In your first reference to it above, you used the money supply creation rate instead of the money supply. As a result, you're looking at a strange definition of 'velocity'. Yours is something like 'average number of transactions per CREATED money unit per unit time' - that's just plain weird.
In the second reference you made above, you used a more normal M which gives a meaningful 'velocity' to discuss. But in this reference, you've continued the wrong idea about M from the first reference. There's no decrease in M as a result of halvings.

Ok, that makes sense. Thank you. So let's look at M as meaning the full 21 million bitcoins ever to be mined. M is constant, but as we approach this limit, we also approach the V limit of 1GB blocks or whatever.  At some point in the future around 2040 at the latest, there will be no more real movement on the left hand side of the equation, right?



3606. Post 13986326 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: redsn0w on February 23, 2016, 07:05:08 PM
Is it over guys or is it just the the beginning ?

The four hour moving average just turned negative, meaning the bulls lost the momentum for now. There's no more to read into this than that. 



3607. Post 13986490 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: jbreher on February 23, 2016, 07:17:31 PM
I know the U.S. has suppressed voices of dissent, but in modern times we've had nothing like the Tienanmen Square Massacre.

I'm on board with your main point, but I need to stop you right here.

Waco, anyone? How soon we forget.

Waco was a little different.  It wasn't a freedom movement that was crushed. Tiananmen Square is right in the middle of everything. Nobody has ever said that about Waco. There is no question that is was government thuggery, but like I said, there are different levels of Statist evil. There was never any danger of The Branch Davidians becoming a major religion and political force. The Feds targeted them because they could, like bullies do.  Occupy WallStreet would be a better comparison and it was broken up with billy clubs, not tanks.

I won't ever forget Waco.  We need decentralized mining not because the U.S. is more free than China (that is irrelevant even if true.) We need decentralized mining so no government anywhere can censor our transactions.  The problem is I don't how how it is possible to decentralize mining given China's electricity and labor cost advantage and  proximity to chip makers.  Every ASIC mining in China over 49.9% actually hurts network security.



3608. Post 13986696 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):



Do you know where this man is today? Because if you do, you're the only one. He was "disappeared". They guys in those tanks control our network today. Maybe they don't run the mines, but they can take them over any time they want, which the guys who DO run them know damn well. That is not censorship resistance.

Bravest motherfucker I ever saw. Tank commander was probably afraid his treads would get jammed by this guy's steel balls.




3609. Post 13986842 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 23, 2016, 08:04:13 PM


Do you know where this man is today? Because if you do, you're the only one. He was "disappeared". They guys in those tanks control our network today. Maybe they don't run the mines, but they can take them over any time they want, which the guys who DO run them know damn well. That is not censorship resistance.

Bravest motherfucker I ever saw. Tank commander was probably afraid his treads would get jammed by this guy's steel balls.

doesn't it kinda feel like this when you buy these dips, only the tank doesn't stop, treads don't get jammed and our steel balls get flaten  Undecided

omfg i sound like NLC. i need leave this place! @_@

You can't hold back the tide either when it's coming in or going out. You have to surf the waves, Brother.



3610. Post 13987223 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: toknormal on February 23, 2016, 08:29:23 PM

doesn't it kinda feel like this when you buy these dips, only the tank doesn't stop, treads don't get jammed and our steel balls get flaten  Undecided

To me things are looking good. Correction back to $421. No problem.

It's not going back to $365.15 I don't think. Indicators are in good nick, the 4, 6 and 12 hours charts need to work through their corrections which may take a few days to a couple of weeks. If they do that in a reasonably orderly manner (like staying above say $400, worst case odd dip to $380-90) then the market will be in a very strong position to finally traverse the great GORF.

Keep your eye on the 12-hour moving averages and moving average convergeance-divergeance which will inform the behaviour of the lower order ranges. If the MACD histogram puts in a clear bar early on in the red zone then we're looking at the optimistic end of things. But if it digs with solid reds for several days then we could be looking at a failed breakout.



You may be right, depending on a few variables.
1) that the pump wasn't based on a belief that miners and Core have a marriage and not just an alliance based on temporarily aligned interests. I think this is probably true.
2) That the pump wasn't/isn't a well-coordinated hype/manipulation from people who are just looking for a permanent way out (like possibly the Silk Road auction pump) I think this is true
3) That the inevitable shake-up either within Core or between Core and the miners won't cause serious dumpage at least as big as recent pumpage. I think this is fairy dust and unicorn poop.

Regardless of any of this, I want out. I'd like to get out at the best price, but in hindsight that was $1100 27 months ago. The problem is POW and how it can only lead to continued Chinese dominance of mining and loss of censorship resistance. Cheap electricity and labor give the Chinese a mining advantage under any POW scenario for the foreseeable future.   

The miners are at Core's Mercy. The miners are at the ChiCom's mercy. Overdeveloped mining in China is producing negative security returns. Fixing that if it is even possible will be correlated with a crash ahuluva lot bigger than a $30 dip. 




3611. Post 13987301 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 23, 2016, 08:54:41 PM


TA aside, i think it still looks good because the "conesens" looks like it'll hold up. I saw a comment from Gavin somewhere today saying somthing along the lines of "Classic will continue to be compatible with Core as they move forward with their plan", was i dreaming? idk.

I think a lot of poeple are thinking this consensus, isn't a consensus, because of a few loud morons ( ex Coinbase saying " we want 2MB and Then segwit , and not the other way around! ")  which Makes it seem as tho this consensus will fall apart.

this is what this drop is about. but now it's over. now even these mistaken views have been priced in. I took advantage of the sellers today.

Core's consensus rules give loud morons veto power.



3612. Post 13987627 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 23, 2016, 09:06:14 PM


TA aside, i think it still looks good because the "conesens" looks like it'll hold up. I saw a comment from Gavin somewhere today saying somthing along the lines of "Classic will continue to be compatible with Core as they move forward with their plan", was i dreaming? idk.

I think a lot of poeple are thinking this consensus, isn't a consensus, because of a few loud morons ( ex Coinbase saying " we want 2MB and Then segwit , and not the other way around! ")  which Makes it seem as tho this consensus will fall apart.

this is what this drop is about. but now it's over. now even these mistaken views have been priced in. I took advantage of the sellers today.

Core's consensus rules give loud morons veto power.

It is Bitcoin consensus rule you moron.

Neither Core nor Classic nor Blockstream nor Obama can do anything about it.

So you admit it gives loud moron's veto power then. Ok, we agree on something.



3613. Post 13987791 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 23, 2016, 09:50:57 PM
looks like a buy:


Treated like real money = you can deposit them on a bank so that they can give you negative interest on your bitcoins Cheesy

I LOLd.  You gotta love banks that get paid when you hold their money AND when they hold your money. We should all direct deposit our paychecks to them. Oh, wait. I already do that.

EDIT: Could this have anything to do with someone wanting to unload Gox coins at the highest possible price?



3614. Post 13987835 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 23, 2016, 10:02:10 PM


He could only be so lucky, with all of those Ethereum pump and dump profits, he deserves a bit of a reward, no?

Yet, I am not sure whether his skinny bones could handle such, and he may get r3kt

I think Adam meant he'll get r3kt financially. But yeah, that too.


Well, she looks like a fairly wholesome girl. 


I mean, I'm thinking that she would not be as high maintenance as some other girls.

So, in that regards, possibly a million or two would be good enough for her to feel comfortable.

Golddiggers are simple. They only want want thing:  MOAR



3615. Post 13987908 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 23, 2016, 10:15:12 PM
signs of war in the heavens ... or is it the blockapocalypse?

That's fullblocalypseTM




3616. Post 13988311 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: rpietila on February 23, 2016, 11:03:19 PM

It's not every day I am called sexy so better qft...

We have been graced with the presence of Risto.  This can only mean one thing: dump incoming!
He's like the Angel of Death, that guy.



3617. Post 13988404 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Let's see what the status of the apparatus is:

Mining is concentrated in a country known to nationalize businesses, be hostile towards Bitcoin and to manipulate currency.

Blocks are full and getting more fullerer.

Core is divided on scaling solutions, but won't do anything without near unanimity.

Etherium is threatening to overtake our firstmover advantage.

MtGox bankruptcy coins are going on the auction block probably in a few months.

Classic growth seems to have slowed or stopped.

So of course the market is going up.  Makes sense.








3618. Post 13988618 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

I have another question for smallblockers: Won't higher fees make it harder to mix coins and remain anonymous?



3619. Post 13988765 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 24, 2016, 12:16:05 AM
I have another question for smallblockers: Won't higher fees make it harder to mix coins and remain anonymous?

LN will be so confusing its like the mixing service was built in.

I think it's possible we're gonna need something like the lightning network eventually, but instead of a hardfork that would buy them more time to build it, they want small blocks so we have the incentive to build it. This is crazy. This is like robbing someone so they have the incentive to be more careful in the future, and trying to justify it as being in the victim's best interest.






3620. Post 13989507 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

So, no answer at all on the mixing? anyone?

Just wondering 'cuz you know, blocks are pretty full. I know it's completely unexpected and no one could have possibly predicted it, but it seems like maybe we can argue about it for a few minutes and then reach a decision, right?

anybody know how I can get my hands on some Etherium?






3621. Post 13989621 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Regarding incentives, what about this line of reasoning:

If you were say a cryptograher/coder and you worked on Bitcoin, but wanted to create your own cryptocoin, and watch it gain popularity after you made it, Would you have any incentive at all to sabotage the current frontrunner by objecting to any and all reasonable proposals for improvement?

If you knew that even a tiny minority of dissent in the community could shutdown those improvements, and that your sabotage would likely succeed, would that maybe give you added temptation?

I'm not accusing anyone of anything, but since we are supposed to look for attack vectors and vulnerabilities, is this not a concern? If not, why not? Are all developers and POTENTIAL developers above reproach? Should they be?









3622. Post 13989821 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: elite3000 on February 24, 2016, 03:47:12 AM
Regarding incentives, what about this line of reasoning:

If you were say a cryptograher/coder and you worked on Bitcoin, but wanted to create your own cryptocoin, and watch it gain popularity after you made it, Would you have any incentive at all to sabotage the current frontrunner by objecting to any and all reasonable proposals for improvement?

If you knew that even a tiny minority of dissent in the community could shutdown those improvements, and that your sabotage would likely succeed, would that maybe give you added temptation?

I'm not accusing anyone of anything, but since we are supposed to look for attack vectors and vulnerabilities, is this not a concern? If not, why not? Are all developers and POTENTIAL developers above reproach? Should they be?


You would do it with the risk of killing yourself in the process, first cryptos need to grow and become popular and their presence in the society reaches a no return point, then you can use Machiavellic plans to kill BTC and make your own currency the top one

Right, I agree most would think this way, but would they ALL think this way?  Does nobody ever make the choice to rule in Hell rather than serve in heaven? To be the Big Fish in a small pond even if it means muddier water? Is there any procedure or rule in place to prevent this from happening? If so, what is it and if not why not?

And how popular would Crypto have to be before our hypothetical Machiavilli judged his plan would be fruitful? The point where our chief competition (the Banks) invest substantially in blockchain technology? I ask because it seems like that's already happening.

Trying to think like an evil person, and knowing that network effects can be very strong, I would assume there is a rather limited window of opportunity to pull off this scheme and it would be better to err on the side of being too early than too late.



3623. Post 13993272 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):



I have a suspicion that there is quite a bit of stolen/extorted BTC lying around as well as money that needs to be laundered for other purposes in addition to BTC holdings that just want to remain anonymous through mixing. Blocks are filling up fast, which means mixing may get prohibitively expensive soon, so knowledge that blocks are filling up is actually making blocks fill up faster.

mix -'em if you got 'em.



3624. Post 13993550 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on February 24, 2016, 12:30:16 PM
billyjoeallen still bearish? Close your shorts already. Don't be greedy. You will not get a better price anytime soon.

I keep saying this: my short is a hedge, an insurance policy. I am longer than you.  You should feel good to know that at some point I will cover or that it will blow up, meaning I am absolutely committed to buying at some time the future.  Pump away. Don't worry about me.



3625. Post 13995627 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg13993733#msg13993733

Is this accurate? F2Pool.com backing out of consensus roundtable agreement?



3626. Post 13995798 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 24, 2016, 04:11:43 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg13993733#msg13993733

Is this accurate? F2Pool.com backing out of consensus roundtable agreement?

i don't understand how Adam Back trying to distance himself away from Blockstream cheats F2Pool, or as any bearing on the consensus.

and that users trust rating says  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=16114
Quote

He is threatening to DDOS Kanos pool and is scamming his miners and not verifying and building on blocks from kanos pool, he says it himself in his posts, please see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg13204430#msg13204430

Quote
Tried to extort Discus Fish (F2Pool) for 2 BTC (via DDoS attack).
correction that ^  was a sent Feedback.

no idea but doesn't seem very legit.

hmmm is F2Pool speaking for all its clients when it says that.


It has the bearing that if Back's support of the agreement is his own or is representative of Blockstream's support. It gives BS wiggle room to renegotiate terms it thinks is better (renege).  If this as a real report, that is. If F2Pool backs out (and I'm not sure why they would), it makes it more likely the agreement will fall apart.




3627. Post 13995966 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 24, 2016, 04:36:37 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg13993733#msg13993733

Is this accurate? F2Pool.com backing out of consensus roundtable agreement?

i don't understand how Adam Back trying to distance himself away from Blockstream cheats F2Pool, or as any bearing on the consensus.

and that users trust rating says  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=16114
Quote

He is threatening to DDOS Kanos pool and is scamming his miners and not verifying and building on blocks from kanos pool, he says it himself in his posts, please see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg13204430#msg13204430

Quote
Tried to extort Discus Fish (F2Pool) for 2 BTC (via DDoS attack).
correction that ^  was a sent Feedback.

no idea but doesn't seem very legit.

hmmm is F2Pool speaking for all its clients when it says that.


It has the bearing that if Back's support of the agreement is his own or is representative of Blockstream's support. It gives BS wiggle room to renegotiate terms it thinks is better (renege).  If this as a real report, that is. If F2Pool backs out (and I'm not sure why they would), it makes it more likely the agreement will fall apart.
ya F2Pool  backing out would make the agreement fall apart, then its back to square one.
i can't blame them for being mad at Blockstream, and now demand Clear support from them or else.

and now look at this : https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/43bgrs/peter_todd_sw_is_not_safe_as_a_softfork/

at this point if F2Pool and the rest of the miner are ready for a change of government so am I.

it might be preferable to do this now, rather than later...



I completely agree, but there's no way that will happen without a market crash.  Elections are a scary new thing to the Chinese.



3628. Post 13996127 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 24, 2016, 04:46:45 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg13993733#msg13993733

Is this accurate? F2Pool.com backing out of consensus roundtable agreement?

i don't understand how Adam Back trying to distance himself away from Blockstream cheats F2Pool, or as any bearing on the consensus.

and that users trust rating says  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=16114
Quote

He is threatening to DDOS Kanos pool and is scamming his miners and not verifying and building on blocks from kanos pool, he says it himself in his posts, please see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg13204430#msg13204430

Quote
Tried to extort Discus Fish (F2Pool) for 2 BTC (via DDoS attack).
correction that ^  was a sent Feedback.

no idea but doesn't seem very legit.

hmmm is F2Pool speaking for all its clients when it says that.


It has the bearing that if Back's support of the agreement is his own or is representative of Blockstream's support. It gives BS wiggle room to renegotiate terms it thinks is better (renege).  If this as a real report, that is. If F2Pool backs out (and I'm not sure why they would), it makes it more likely the agreement will fall apart.
ya F2Pool  backing out would make the agreement fall apart, then its back to square one.
i can't blame them for being mad at Blockstream, and now demand Clear support from them or else.

and now look at this : https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/43bgrs/peter_todd_sw_is_not_safe_as_a_softfork/

at this point if F2Pool and the rest of the miner are ready for a change of government so am I.

it might be preferable to do this now, rather than later...



I completely agree, but there's no way that will happen without a market crash.  Elections are a scary new thing to the Chinese.

won't be much of an Election tho, the miners and coinbase are ready and willing to jump to classic at a moment's notice it seems.

I'd give'm a medal for trying so hard to keep the peace... and i'll support them whatever they deiced.

none of this kinda shit happend with Gavin.

I agree. I'd take Gavin back in a heartbeat, but the miner's will have to pay a price for dropping support for Core, considering their recent strong statements to stick with them no matter what.  They will get Core FUD, but more importantly they will get investors and speculators wondering if they don't know what they're doing.

And there is evidence Chinese miners DON'T know what they are doing. All additional hashpower being added there is producing negative security returns in an insane greedy rush that at least RESEMBLES a race to the bottom.



3629. Post 13996351 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 24, 2016, 05:08:24 PM
... the miner's will have to pay a price for dropping support for Core, considering their recent strong statements to stick with them no matter what. ...

Wait, am I understanding you correctly? This handshake deal is really falling apart? Shocked



I was asking a question. This could be misinformation for all I know. I don't what to start any rumors.  

EDIT:
AB put his title back on the Agreement:

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/bitcoin-roundtable-consensus-266d475a61ff#.z6255vhzr

This was likely not an accidental omission corrected but a response to F2Pool's threat.  



3630. Post 13996882 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 24, 2016, 05:30:30 PM
i feel as tho i'm being manipulated from one side to another over and over and over.

What have bigblockers done to manipulate anyone?  I just asked a question and provided a link. I made it clear I don't know any more than that. I feel very frustrated in fact that while I am limited by ethics in what i can do to persuade people, smallblockers apparently are not.




3631. Post 13996917 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: becoin on February 24, 2016, 05:24:43 PM
Bitcoin Core 0.12 is officially released. I'm glad I can now ban the few 'classic' nodes that try to promote bitcoin altcoin fork.

Core is so concerned about node dropoff that they now want to ban any node not running their code. Makes sense.



3632. Post 13997032 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Has anyone seen ANY tweets or statements by Core bigshots in support of this miner agreement?  I haven't seen any and I've been looking. I think it's strange because the agreement would doom Classic if ratified.

I suspect the whole damn thing was just another delaying tactic, something we should have come to expect by now from BS et al.



3633. Post 13997060 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 24, 2016, 06:24:28 PM
i feel as tho i'm being manipulated from one side to another over and over and over.

What have bigblockers done to manipulate anyone? 

FUDing all day long about "full blocks"?

We've had more transactions in the last month than at anytime in history. Yes, blocks are full.  Maybe not to the point that nothing can move (yet) but to the point where it is becoming impractical and cost-prohibitive to mix coins and maintain anonymity.



3634. Post 13997198 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: xslugx on February 24, 2016, 06:42:06 PM
Has anyone seen ANY tweets or statements by Core bigshots in support of this miner agreement?  I haven't seen any and I've been looking. I think it's strange because the agreement would doom Classic if ratified.

I suspect the whole damn thing was just another delaying tactic, something we should have come to expect by now from BS et al.

Then why hasn't Core publicly denounced the consensus?

Some devs have, but nobody important.

EDIT: Peter Todd doesn't like it because he thinks SW ought to be a hard fork. I actually kind of agree with him on that.



3635. Post 13997230 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 24, 2016, 06:40:44 PM
...
FUDing all day long about "full blocks"?

As in ChartBuddy posting how full the blocks are?

As in bigblockers pretending the fullblockalypse is coming when you can get a tx included in <10 blocks for 1 cent, and in one block with 5 cents.

We've had more transactions in the last month than at anytime in history. Yes, blocks are full.  Maybe not to the point that nothing can move (yet) but to the point where it is becoming impractical and cost-prohibitive to mix coins and maintain anonymity.

1c to 5c fees are by no means cost-prohibitive (they are near zero cost) and also very practical.

How many times do you have to pay that nickle to thoroughly mix $10,000?   Next month it will be a dime. and then a quarter.  The point is you pay NOTHING using dash or monero.  Our first mover advantage is slipping.



3636. Post 13997308 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on February 24, 2016, 06:47:42 PM
Has anyone seen ANY tweets or statements by Core bigshots in support of this miner agreement?

Well, a number of the actual signatures in that document are followed by the words "Bitcoin Core Contributor", FWIW.

I don't know if any of them qualify as "Core bigshots".


https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/bitcoin-roundtable-consensus-266d475a61ff#.81twpud0t


Yeah, but who among them are trying to sell it to the rest of Core? It has to be nearly unanimous under current rules or it won't get adopted.



3637. Post 13997640 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

I'm curious how Adam's experiment went, if it's over, but even if he gets the transaction through, it may not mean much.

Let's say you are in a football stadium that's filling up with water.  The water height is doubling every three minutes. It is has taken six hours to reach one quarter full. How many more minutes until it is totally full and you drown?

six minutes.

This doesn't mean we'll get fullblockalypse in the next couple of months because network activity is positively correlated with BTC price.  What it means is that a higher price will boost network activity which will reach a limit not much higher than now, which will bog down the network, which will drop the price, which wil encourage new buyers, which will raise the price...rinse and repeat.

A transaction limit is effectively a price limit, or at least a price rate of growth limit.

in the mean time, in addition to having lost censorship resistance, it will become increasingly more difficult to remain anonymous because it will be harder/more expensive  to mix coins.

Is a Bitcoin without censorship resistance AND without anonymous transactions still Bitcoin?




3638. Post 13997846 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

More BS:

Quote
" Thankfully we at Blockstream are given the freedom to speak and act as individuals on this matter. Even Adam is attending as an individual, his signature not carrying the weight of representing Blockstream in this instance.
I cautioned against going and was not in the room (I feel this meeting was antithetical to Bitcoin and no good outcomes were likely) so I only know second hand like you what was or was not said. But regarding the "consensus" document that was posted on medium, no I am not on board with that outcome."~ maaku7

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46po4l/we_have_consensus_in_april_we_get_sw_3_months/d07gqic



3639. Post 13998013 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on February 24, 2016, 08:13:56 PM


LOL, just withdrew some BTC from an exchange, they are paying 0.00015936 XBT = $0.0924195 CAD per tx. just got 2 confirmations in like 2 minus.
Blocks are only full if your are not paying almost $0.10 per transaction.

and so it begins - to quote rocks

Quote
The goal is to slowly introduce a fee market. First slowly knock out very low value transactions, then add SFSW to slightly increase capacity. Then knock out moderately low value transactions, then add 2017 2MB HF to slightly increase capacity.

They will increase capacity, but at a very slow rate that falls behind usage growth. The effect will be a slow introduction of a fee market that removes more and more use cases for Bitcoin.

There is a limit to how slow Bitcoin can grow just like there is a limit to how slow an airplane can fly before it falls out of the sky. I don't know what that limit is, but somebody apparently wants to find out.



3640. Post 13998301 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 24, 2016, 08:44:48 PM
it's OK tho, when LN comes out fee will go right back to 1cent, because it will relieve a lot of pressure from the blockchain

LN is designed to improve scaling. Fee reductions are just a consequence of being able to conduct more transactions.

Remember how the US$ got bootstrapped? the Gold Standard?
Gold standard's long gone.
People still use LN USD Smiley

LN doesn't have legal tender laws to force people to use it.  If it's not backed by Bitcoin (or something) the market will probably reject it in favor of something better.




3641. Post 13999437 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 24, 2016, 09:25:00 PM


LOL, just withdrew some BTC from an exchange, they are paying 0.00015936 XBT = $0.0924195 CAD per tx. just got 2 confirmations in like 2 minus.
Blocks are only full if your are not paying almost $0.10 per transaction.

and so it begins - to quote rocks

Quote
The goal is to slowly introduce a fee market. First slowly knock out very low value transactions, then add SFSW to slightly increase capacity. Then knock out moderately low value transactions, then add 2017 2MB HF to slightly increase capacity.

They will increase capacity, but at a very slow rate that falls behind usage growth. The effect will be a slow introduction of a fee market that removes more and more use cases for Bitcoin.

There is a limit to how slow Bitcoin can grow just like there is a limit to how slow an airplane can fly before it falls out of the sky. I don't know what that limit is, but somebody apparently wants to find out.

good test pilots know that one of the first things to do when type converting to a new aircraft is handling familiarisation which should include taking it into a stall, side-slips, perhaps an incipient spin ... you need to test the limits before you really know the system behaviour thoroughly enough (at the limits) before you take it up for a real bashing in turbulence with paying passengers on board

hey, Chuck Yeager, there are already paying passengers on board.  We are refugees. We know you warned us that your plane was still untested, but many of us didn't really have a choice.  



3642. Post 13999622 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 24, 2016, 11:25:32 PM


LOL, just withdrew some BTC from an exchange, they are paying 0.00015936 XBT = $0.0924195 CAD per tx. just got 2 confirmations in like 2 minus.
Blocks are only full if your are not paying almost $0.10 per transaction.

and so it begins - to quote rocks

Quote
The goal is to slowly introduce a fee market. First slowly knock out very low value transactions, then add SFSW to slightly increase capacity. Then knock out moderately low value transactions, then add 2017 2MB HF to slightly increase capacity.

They will increase capacity, but at a very slow rate that falls behind usage growth. The effect will be a slow introduction of a fee market that removes more and more use cases for Bitcoin.

There is a limit to how slow Bitcoin can grow just like there is a limit to how slow an airplane can fly before it falls out of the sky. I don't know what that limit is, but somebody apparently wants to find out.

good test pilots know that one of the first things to do when type converting to a new aircraft is handling familiarisation which should include taking it into a stall, side-slips, perhaps an incipient spin ... you need to test the limits before you really know the system behaviour thoroughly enough (at the limits) before you take it up for a real bashing in turbulence with paying passengers on board

hey, Chuck Yeager, their are already paying passengers on board.  We are refugees. We know you warned us that your plane was still untested, but many of us didn't really have a choice.  

buckle up then fly-boy, this is going to get rough ... we told you it was still a beta (experimental) project ... fancy going for some tail-spins?

Yeah, no. I'm looking around at the seats, The tray-tables, the safety belts, even the main engines and landing gear- everything says "made in China".



3643. Post 13999971 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

I think I finally understand the true nature of this controversy: Smallblockers are Jacobites.

A little background:  Jacobites are those that claim that the Royal Family of England are not the true heirs because somewhere way back, the rules of succession were not properly followed and the Elector of Hanover was crowned king mainly because he wasn't Catholic.  Jacobites are correct, but what they don't seem to understand is that it doesn't matter at all.  At this point in history nobody is going to take the crown off of Lizzy and plop in onto Prince Alois of Lichtenstein or whoever. Not. gonna. happen. Rules of succession were made to ensure orderly transition of power, not the other way around.

In our version,  Smallblockers think that non-core code is by definition not Bitcoin. So if the miners adopt Classic (or whatever), that network of miners, nodes, exchanges, wallets, etc is no longer Bitcoin.  AGAIN, that may be literally true (if you accept that definition) but it won't matter at all.  The true definer of consensus is reality.  Will that network be viable? I don't know the answer to that, but it is virtually certain that the jacobite (Core) fork will not.  Hashpower secures the network.

The man who commands the English army is the de facto King of England. The code that runs the Bitcoin network is Bitcoin code. This will be decided by the miners. 





 



3644. Post 14000559 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 25, 2016, 01:31:11 AM
I think I finally understand the true nature of this controversy: Smallblockers are Jacobites.

A little background:  Jacobites are those that claim that the Royal Family of England are not the true heirs because somewhere way back, the rules of succession were not properly followed and the Elector of Hanover was crowned king mainly because he wasn't Catholic.  Jacobites are correct, but what they don't seem to understand is that it doesn't matter at all.  At this point in history nobody is going to take the crown off of Lizzy and plop in onto Prince Alois of Lichtenstein or whoever. Not. gonna. happen. Rules of succession were made to ensure orderly transition of power, not the other way around.

In our version,  Smallblockers think that non-core code is by definition not Bitcoin. So if the miners adopt Classic (or whatever), that network of miners, nodes, exchanges, wallets, etc is no longer Bitcoin.  AGAIN, that may be literally true (if you accept that definition) but it won't matter at all.  The true definer of consensus is reality.  Will that network be viable? I don't know the answer to that, but it is virtually certain that the jacobite (Core) fork will not.  Hashpower secures the network.


your ability to relate anything to bitcoin's current situation is amazing.


anyway,

i was trying to explain the situation to my dad, and he kept bugging on " everyone will just stick to Bitcoin the original  if there's no consensus. " i didnt have time to finish the convo i had to run out the door, but here what i will tell him tomorrow.

"
that is not what will happen
forget it, "Bitcoin the original" doesn't exist even today.
either we all come together ( segwit + 2MB ) and call it bitcoin with Core as the "government"
or there will be a fork, and each impl will change in their own way.
there is no "original" there is only 2 new coins Core and Classic
each with their own hashing power, each with there own new impls.
this should be avoided, but at this point miners are on the brink.
I know you like the Idea of bitcoin being the "Backbone" to a second layer, but >80% of the hashing power disagrees.
I for one will not fallow Mr Blue hair and BS BlockStream team ( whose president is nowhere to be found -_- )
maybe i'm going nuts! ( it wouldn't be the first time, and it sure as hell won't be the last )
but i think it would be prudent to make damn sure ALL your coins are under your control, incase the fork happens tomorrow.
"




hahahahahaha...

Listen to your dad... he sounds correct, even if he doesn't really know what he is talking about.

There is generally a presumption of maintaining the status quo, and probably, that is the point that he is making regarding saying bitcoin the original will live on.  hahahahaha Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



YOU GO>>>>>>>>> DADDY AdamstgBit!!!!!!!!!!

Most miners, particularly Chinese miners don't give a shit about Bitcoin other than as a revenue source. They will perpetuate the status quo as long as it makes them money and not a second longer.  Already you see some of them trying to find a face-saving way to back out of the Roundtable Consensus because they know or suspect that it's too little too late for scaling and that Core won't ever honor it anyway. In fact, according to their own rules, they CAN'T honor it.

The status quo is good for BTC price until blocks are full and then it's bad.  Blocks are almost full. The future is full of uncertainty. Markets hate uncertainty.




3645. Post 14000736 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 25, 2016, 02:14:58 AM
blocks are completely full
every single one
my 1cent fee tx has yet to be mined

They are full precisely because almost all near-zero fee transactions are currently included.

Are all zero fee transactions included in Litecoin, Dash, monero, etherium?  Bitcoin is losing market share because competitors are underpricing us. 



3646. Post 14000818 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 25, 2016, 02:29:08 AM
blocks are completely full
every single one
my 1cent fee tx has yet to be mined

They are full precisely because almost all near-zero fee transactions are currently included.

Are all zero fee transactions included in Litecoin, Dash, monero, etherium?  Bitcoin is losing market share because competitors are underpricing us. 

Just open a block explorer and you'll see LTC and DASH has like 4-5-6 tx/block, monero is at 0-1.

BTC does like 2000 txs/block.

You are either gaining market share or you are losing it. It doesn't matter how far of a lead you have. if your competitor is picking up speed and you are slowing down, in a long enough race, you will lose.



3647. Post 14001105 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 25, 2016, 02:56:54 AM
blocks are completely full
every single one
my 1cent fee tx has yet to be mined

They are full precisely because almost all near-zero fee transactions are currently included.

Are all zero fee transactions included in Litecoin, Dash, monero, etherium?  Bitcoin is losing market share because competitors are underpricing us. 

Just open a block explorer and you'll see LTC and DASH has like 4-5-6 tx/block, monero is at 0-1.

BTC does like 2000 txs/block.

You are either gaining market share or you are losing it. It doesn't matter how far of a lead you have. if your competitor is picking up speed and you are slowing down, in a long enough race, you will lose.

no coin has had the heat thrown at it that bitcoin has ... if any of them get big enough to warrant more than a 'meh' then the blow torch comes on them.

I want to see the BS of V. Buterin explode into a full-blown internet rage war, PoS ethereum is going to encourage some truly sick politicking, you thought PoW chinese miners was an 'issue'?

No coin...yet. We seem to be talking past each other. Look, there can be only one "most marketable commodity" by definition. Another word for that term is "money".  In order for something to be marketable, you have to be able to bring it to market. To exchange it.  NO cryptocoin is money yet, but no cryptocoin will ever become money if it can't be exchangeable in the frequencies money needs to be exchanged.

If Etherium has more utility due to smart contracts, turing completeness or whatever, it will gain market share faster. PoS has serious problems and I've always said that, but it turns our PoW also has a serious problem: Chinese electricity and labor cost advantages means ANY PoW plan may result in the same loss of censorship resistance Bitcoin is experiencing with mining overdevelopment and concentration in one political jurisdiction.

 



3648. Post 14001215 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 25, 2016, 03:25:47 AM
Someone on Reddit proposed BitcoinRadical today: to fork away from the Commies, you see.  Undecided

Censorship-Coin?


I saw it earlier but can't find it now. Hey, has anyone noticed that two of the signatories on the CRTA are Han Solo and Wang Chung?




3649. Post 14001249 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 25, 2016, 03:40:41 AM
Quote
but it turns our PoW also has a serious problem: Chinese electricity and labor cost advantages means ANY PoW plan may result in the same loss of censorship resistance Bitcoin is experiencing with mining overdevelopment and concentration in one political jurisdiction.

there is no "serious" problem with PoW ... as much as you repeat the lie/propaganda it's not going to fly; the chinese miners will scrap each other for every bitcoin reward the same as any other 'western' bitcoin miners

what's going to be your next FUD hobby horse? you are following the same FUD playbook as JTrolfi now ... mining flawed ... china (xenophobic pandering) 'issues' ... developers arguing ... gubmint regulation ... omg bitcoin doom! ... rinse repeat, at least come up with something original

Listen, Fuknut. It's not the miners. I've said that all along. It's the people who could point guns at the miners any time they want. That's what censorship is, you tiresome Jacobite.



3650. Post 14001255 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

page 15000 w00t!



3651. Post 14001301 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 25, 2016, 03:54:42 AM
Quote
I've said that all along. It's the people who could point guns at the miners any time they want. That's what censorship is

... and then what, they shoot the blockchain into pieces?! omg bitcoin doomed

Shut them down if they are stupid, but they aren't stupid. The Chinese have a higher average IQ than Europeans and Americans. They would do what the Chinese do: they would manipulate the currency. 51% attacks, double spends or merely threaten to do so. 



3652. Post 14001342 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 25, 2016, 03:43:26 AM
Someone on Reddit proposed BitcoinRadical today: to fork away from the Commies, you see.  Undecided

Censorship-Coin?


I saw it earlier but can't find it now. Hey, has anyone noticed that two of the signatories on the CRTA are Han Solo and Wang Chung?



Theymos removed it, that bookburning crypto-fascist.



3653. Post 14001373 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: stoat on February 25, 2016, 04:09:07 AM
I think there won't be a price rise at halving which will kill off the chinese miners THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN.

If the chinese continue to dominate and centralise the bitcoin network then Ethereum will have to take over where BTC failed.  As you can see, Ethereum market cap is now $0.5billion and will be $1billion soon.



Good plan except it will hurt non-Chinese miners (who pay more for electricity) more. There's no way out of this trap.



3654. Post 14001425 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 25, 2016, 04:14:46 AM
Quote
I've said that all along. It's the people who could point guns at the miners any time they want. That's what censorship is

... and then what, they shoot the blockchain into pieces?! omg bitcoin doomed

Shut them down if they are stupid, but they aren't stupid. The Chinese have a higher average IQ than Europeans and Americans. They would do what the Chinese do: they would manipulate the currency. 51% attacks, double spends or merely threaten to do so.  

This is the part where we change the PoW… just like some are threatening to do if 75% of the blocks start voting for 2MB.

The important difference… it would be unanimous in the case of chinese govt takeover of mines, far from it with a simple upgrade to 2MB max blocks with miners using soft limits along their supply curve.

15000, and a big delete buffer  Cool

How long would that take? How soon could we agree on a different hashing algorithm? How long to write the code and update the nodes? How much hashpower would secure the new fork? Face it, the ChiComs could damage Bitcoin beyond repair, or at least destroy our firstmover advantage and crash the price to pennies.



3655. Post 14001467 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: stoat on February 25, 2016, 04:21:29 AM
I think there won't be a price rise at halving which will kill off the chinese miners THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN.

If the chinese continue to dominate and centralise the bitcoin network then Ethereum will have to take over where BTC failed.  As you can see, Ethereum market cap is now $0.5billion and will be $1billion soon.



Good plan except it will hurt non-Chinese miners (who pay more for electricity) more. There's no way out of this trap.

Corporate bitcoin mining needs to die.

The only way out is going back to hobby mining.

So your solution is to take away the profit incentive? You can hobby mine any of a a number of alts now or start your own.  There's no going back, Hoss. Maybe we can talk President Trump into converting the Utah NSA supersnooper datacenter into a giant Bitcoin mine, but I wouldn't count on it.

I've thought of all these proposals for a while. There doesn't seem to be a solution. There may not be one and if there is, it's not obvious.

EDIT: you know reversion back to hobby mining may be the best of all shitty options. Nobody buy us hard core bitcoiners will invest in mining equipment knowing that a fork could render our gear worthless, knowing that the last hard fork rendered millions in gear worthless.



3656. Post 14001496 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 25, 2016, 04:34:58 AM
Quote
I've said that all along. It's the people who could point guns at the miners any time they want. That's what censorship is

... and then what, they shoot the blockchain into pieces?! omg bitcoin doomed

Shut them down if they are stupid, but they aren't stupid. The Chinese have a higher average IQ than Europeans and Americans. They would do what the Chinese do: they would manipulate the currency. 51% attacks, double spends or merely threaten to do so.  

This is the part where we change the PoW… just like some are threatening to do if 75% of the blocks start voting for 2MB.

The important difference… it would be unanimous in the case of chinese govt takeover of mines, far from it with a simple upgrade to 2MB max blocks with miners using soft limits along their supply curve.

15000, and a big delete buffer  Cool

How long would that take? How soon could we agree on a different hashing algorithm? How much hashpower would secure the new fork? Face it, the ChiComs could damage Bitcoin beyond repair, or at least destroy our firstmover advantage and crash the price to pennies.

It'd be a nightmare for sure, but not insurmountable I think. As gmax likes to say, the candidate code is ready. The chances of you seeing it are probably much higher than a hostile takeover by the PRC.

The probability of a hostile takeover by the PRC goes up as $/BTC goes up. So if we continue on our upward trajectory, the only question is what's gonna kill us first, the commies or fullblocalypse?



3657. Post 14001546 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 25, 2016, 04:46:51 AM
Aaaand... the debate has risen to the tenor of "accusations of cockgobbling"



Way to go Samson Mow, CTO of BTCC

Bobby Lee must be proud.

classy.



3658. Post 14001558 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: BitThink on February 25, 2016, 04:50:15 AM
Quote
I've said that all along. It's the people who could point guns at the miners any time they want. That's what censorship is

... and then what, they shoot the blockchain into pieces?! omg bitcoin doomed

Shut them down if they are stupid, but they aren't stupid. The Chinese have a higher average IQ than Europeans and Americans. They would do what the Chinese do: they would manipulate the currency. 51% attacks, double spends or merely threaten to do so.  

This is the part where we change the PoW… just like some are threatening to do if 75% of the blocks start voting for 2MB.

The important difference… it would be unanimous in the case of chinese govt takeover of mines, far from it with a simple upgrade to 2MB max blocks with miners using soft limits along their supply curve.

15000, and a big delete buffer  Cool

How long would that take? How soon could we agree on a different hashing algorithm? How much hashpower would secure the new fork? Face it, the ChiComs could damage Bitcoin beyond repair, or at least destroy our firstmover advantage and crash the price to pennies.

It'd be a nightmare for sure, but not insurmountable I think. As gmax likes to say, the candidate code is ready. The chances of you seeing it are probably much higher than a hostile takeover by the PRC.

The probability of a hostile takeover by the PRC goes up as $/BTC goes up. So if we continue on our upward trajectory, the only question is what's gonna kill us first, the commies or fullblocalypse?
I feel in your imagination, China is a city and all miners are inside one room, and the government is a man with a gun who can shoot anyone he want at anytime.

No, China is a huge diverse nation under the political control of a single party government that has murdered more of it's own citizens than any other government in the history of civilization. What's not to love?



3659. Post 14001669 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

I can't believe I even have to say this but I do not hate the Chinese. I hate single party currency-manipulating governments with a sketchy understanding and respect for property rights and free speech.

Canadians, OTOH...

Plaid-wearing moosehumpers.



3660. Post 14001822 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 25, 2016, 05:36:01 AM
https://youtu.be/UjZuM2qUiF4?t=2m19s

and poeple are starting to buy alts...


we are all going to die.

from 90% to 84% percent market share in two months! If Bitcoin was a corporation, it would be extraordinary for the CEO NOT to get sacked by the Board of Directors.  That is a stunning loss of market share in so little of time. It took IBM, Microsoft, Yahoo! years to lose that much. Not sure about MySpace though. 



3661. Post 14001983 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

2600 in new margin longs, 1400 in new margin shorts on BFX. This will either break a little higher or a lot lower.



3662. Post 14002124 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 25, 2016, 06:26:01 AM

the sad news is these altcoins even ETH is no safe haven from what's happening here in bitcoin land, if bitcoin can't do it no one can.
and if everyone ( or a few to many poeple) goes of to doge maid eth   etc
the whole crypto world is going to come crashing down.
i can't quite put my finger on why exactly
but i have a feeling if bitcoiners get all divided up into 10 - 20 different cryptos, it's a big fat FAIL, for all.


some guys who thought they were in charge and puffed up in their suits of self-importance found out they were actually just wind-bags and in fact noone is in charge, just as it said on the tin ... so yeah if they want to break away and form FailCoin they are welcome ... or they can stop stabbing everyone else in the back and start pulling in the same direction again?

The Market is in charge and we either serve the market or we are out of work.  That's true for coders, miners, traders, everyone.



3663. Post 14002253 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 25, 2016, 06:52:18 AM
i just send 1$ to 1LBHYYEbd8eqrfi9PiSEkj35e9vM3iZEFm with a 1cent fee

lets see what happens...

sending it now...
https://blockchain.info/address/1LBHYYEbd8eqrfi9PiSEkj35e9vM3iZEFm

if this dont work ill send it with a 5cent fee.

current block height 399867

Took a while but:

Included In Blocks   399923

Even with near-zero fees at 0.01$ you got in, with lower priority, despite "blocks are full".

Because the time to worry about the rising costs are after they become a problem or before? The time to worry about lifeboat capacity is after the iceberg has been hit? 



3664. Post 14002376 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on February 25, 2016, 07:07:43 AM
What a douche.

Yes, HostFat has really lost it over "ZOMG RITE MEOW" blocksize drama.

He seems to be in shellshock from the utter loss of XT, and may never recover (especially given how Classic is floundering).   Undecided

No, it's Bitcoin that is foundering (not floundering).  Losing market share.  There is all something very Catholic/Protestant about this fight. The One True Bitcoin vs. these upstart individualists.  I'd be interested to see from an anthropological study if there is any correlation between church affiliation and blocksize affiliation.

Do me a favor and ask the rest of the counter-reformation goon squad where they go on Sundays, will you?




3665. Post 14002503 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 25, 2016, 07:29:19 AM
What a douche.

Yes, HostFat has really lost it over "ZOMG RITE MEOW" blocksize drama.

He seems to be in shellshock from the utter loss of XT, and may never recover (especially given how Classic is floundering).   Undecided

No, it's Bitcoin that is foundering (not floundering).  Losing market share.  There is all something very Catholic/Protestant about this fight. The One True Bitcoin vs. these upstart individualists.  I'd be interested to see from an anthropological study if there is any correlation between church affiliation and blocksize affiliation.

Do me a favor and ask the rest of the counter-reformation goon squad where they go on Sundays, will you?

A single data point, but a funny one.

A piece of toast with a picture of my art teacher from school!!!

Bet he couldn't paint an analogy like this, tho.



Wow!  That's exactly what I mean!  the Divine Autonomous Organization.



3666. Post 14002698 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 25, 2016, 07:53:28 AM


And Lo! The poutrage intensifies!

[I fucking hate twitter]

I don't know what's worse: They see the need for the HF and are lying about it just to sell coin or that they don't.



3667. Post 14005382 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

So now blocks have room again?

I'm confused.



3668. Post 14007999 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: aztecminer on February 25, 2016, 04:03:21 PM
I can't believe I even have to say this but I do not hate the Chinese. I hate single party currency-manipulating governments with a sketchy understanding and respect for property rights and free speech.

Canadians, OTOH...

Plaid-wearing moosehumpers.


what about mexicans ??

I love beautiful young Mexican Girls. Especially my daughter.



3669. Post 14010109 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 25, 2016, 07:32:47 PM

Initial Impression --

The Good - Thin blocks, Weak Blocks  (Also Found in Core's roadmap)

The Bad - Advocating for SPV mining , which is a problem exacerbated by their Validate Once proposal, and pushing off the many benefits of  Segwit till the end of the year

The Ugly - 3rd/4th Q 2016  adaptive rule for a block size limit that  heavily incentivizes those with better bandwidth which would drive miners from China to locations with better bandwidth and make many home mining operations obsolete because they cannot compete with the propagation times with larger operations who can afford better uplinks. There is no consideration for centralization concerns or the costs of nodes with this proposal which makes it a non-starter from the get go IMHO.


Ugly? UGLY?? This is exactly what we need, something that neutralizes the Chinese electricity and labor cost advantage.  Without some way of doing that, we cannot regain censorship resistance. The fact that does so while increasing network performance is just a bonus.

The problem i see obviously is that Chinese miners will be reluctant to adopt it.  But if they don't adopt it or something like it, I don't see much future for Bitcoin. Either it will stagnate or it will grow to the point where it becomes a threat to the PRC and they will take over the network.

This proposal is the only ray of hope I see for overcoming the dual problems of scaling and miner concentration.  



3670. Post 14010347 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 25, 2016, 09:48:42 PM

Initial Impression --

The Good - Thin blocks, Weak Blocks  (Also Found in Core's roadmap)

The Bad - Advocating for SPV mining , which is a problem exacerbated by their Validate Once proposal, and pushing off the many benefits of  Segwit till the end of the year

The Ugly - 3rd/4th Q 2016  adaptive rule for a block size limit that  heavily incentivizes those with better bandwidth which would drive miners from China to locations with better bandwidth and make many home mining operations obsolete because they cannot compete with the propagation times with larger operations who can afford better uplinks. There is no consideration for centralization concerns or the costs of nodes with this proposal which makes it a non-starter from the get go IMHO.


Ugly? UGLY?? This is exactly what we need, something that neutralizes the Chinese electricity and labor cost advantage.  Without some way of doing that, we cannot regain censorship resistance. The fact that does so while increasing network performance is just a bonus.

The problem i see obviously is that Chinese miners will be reluctant to adopt it.  But if they don't adopt it or something like it, I don't see much future for Bitcoin. Either it will stagnate or it will grow to the point where it becomes a threat to the PRC and they will take over the network.

This proposal is the only ray of hope I see for overcoming the duel problems of scaling and miner concentration. 

Is he wrong about this?

There is no consideration for centralization concerns or the costs of nodes with this proposal

You are going to have some node centralization in either the CRTA or the Classic RoadMap. The problem is that there are always tradeoffs, so you have to judge which problem is worse: node centralization (nodes are cheap compared to mines) or mining concentration.  Having overwhelming concentration of mining in a single political jurisdiction would be a serious problem anywhere, but having the same issue in Red China makes it much worse.   

The PRC has murdered more of it's own citizens than any other government in the history of civilization. they massacred their own people by the thousands as recently as 1989.  They manipulate currency as a standard matter of policy. They have made it illegal for banks in China to hold Bitcoin accounts or for goods and services to be traded for BTC within the country.   Increasing hashing power within China is producing negative security returns.




3671. Post 14011332 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 25, 2016, 11:57:35 PM

It seems to be much better for bitcoin to grow slowly and also much better not to be too rash in attempts to change governance...

I'm curious how bad/urgent a problem would have to be before you thought a change in governance was appropriate.



3672. Post 14011474 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Why would a governance change be appropriate?

Loss of market share? check.

Loss of six year logarithmic uptrend in price? Check

Gridlock in decision-making? check.

Loss of essential properties such as decentralization, anonymity, sufficient capacity and censorship resistance? check

What more do we fucking need?  How is it not obvious that this is a full-on, five alarm clusterfuck?





3673. Post 14011537 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 26, 2016, 12:28:15 AM
Why would a governance change be appropriate?

Loss of market share? check.

Loss of six year logarithmic uptrend in price? Check

Gridlock in decision-making? check.

Loss of essential properties such as decentralization, anonymity, sufficient capacity and censorship resistance? check

What more do we fucking need?  How is it not obvious that this is a full-on, five alarm clusterfuck?


so it was always about governance? you big blocker shills have been led on a merry dance of lies, useful idiots in a coup attempt, just admit it.

Does that mean you don't think it's a clusterfuck or that you do but don't care?



3674. Post 14011643 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 26, 2016, 12:39:07 AM
i'm fighting fire with fire now.

Yeah, you know we firefighters don't really do that, right? I mean sometimes with brushfires the wildland guys will start a backburn to create a firebreak, but often that just makes the problem worse. It's one reason why the Ammonds in Oregon are serving a five year prison sentence.

Just so you know.



3675. Post 14011757 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/47luh3/f2pool_is_under_ddos_attack/

of course they are. Damn miners wouldn't shut up and take it up the ass like good little coolies.




3676. Post 14011797 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: smooth on February 26, 2016, 01:05:46 AM
Why would a governance change be appropriate?

You want a governance change, here's how you do it:

Fork the project without proposing a chain fork. Attract developers and community support, under a new project with new governance rules.


That's my chain. You want it, you're gonna pay for it.



3677. Post 14011854 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 26, 2016, 01:14:33 AM

It seems to be much better for bitcoin to grow slowly and also much better not to be too rash in attempts to change governance...

I'm curious how bad/urgent a problem would have to be before you thought a change in governance was appropriate.

Maybe to the extent to which governance is broken, is a problem that has recently been attempted to be created.


It's probable that problems with management have been exacerbated and amplified by forces that either want to harm Bitcoin or co-opt it, but those were always things that were going to happen anyway.  Core's insistence on unquestioning loyalty like some fourth century Pope is not the way to minimize their effects.



3678. Post 14011885 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: smooth on February 26, 2016, 01:23:39 AM

It seems to be much better for bitcoin to grow slowly and also much better not to be too rash in attempts to change governance...

I'm curious how bad/urgent a problem would have to be before you thought a change in governance was appropriate.

Maybe to the extent to which governance is broken, is a problem that has recently been attempted to be created.

Maybe yes, maybe no. It is certainly possible that the governance issue is being used as a vehicle to promote some other political agenda.

The way to find out is the separate the issue from others and see whether a change in governance, by itself, and without the baggage of simultaneously proposing immediate changes to the software or chain rules, has any support.

Call for a vote of no confidence in Wladimir? I'm down.



3679. Post 14012058 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: orpington on February 26, 2016, 01:45:02 AM

Make the block size limit dynamic


Can someone unpack this for me?
dynamic=unlimited

rubber-dollar.gif

Bitcoin Dynamic!

Now that sounds like an awesome name for an altcoin!

If capacity remains constant but use increases (the situation now), we have a DECREASING capacity relative to demand and diminishing room for growth.  That is an untenable situation. Something's gotta give.



3680. Post 14012198 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 26, 2016, 02:14:56 AM
the classic american idiots

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1BS7XnEZqc


Don't forget the moosehumpers. We're in this together:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_TfBbR6L0M



3681. Post 14012255 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 26, 2016, 02:18:56 AM
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
Why would a governance change be appropriate?

Loss of market share? check.

Loss of six year logarithmic uptrend in price? Check

Gridlock in decision-making? check.

Loss of essential properties such as decentralization, anonymity, sufficient capacity and censorship resistance? check

What more do we fucking need?  How is it not obvious that this is a full-on, five alarm clusterfuck?


so it was always about governance? you big blocker shills have been led on a merry dance of lies, useful idiots in a coup attempt, just admit it.

Does that mean you don't think it's a clusterfuck or that you do but don't care?

bitcoin is unaware of your socialist clusterfecks and human induced conflicts ... in the last 24 hours it processed 215k TX worth $1.2 billion in the most borderless, censorship-resistant, cheapest and secure method on the planet.

Bitcoin is the leper with the most toes. Clearly worrying about it's health is fearmongering. Is that your best argument?



3682. Post 14013185 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 26, 2016, 04:01:09 AM
if you small blocker truly believe the shit you say you should from a group that wishes to lower block limit to 0.5MB.

you'll get more decentralization and security, for everything else there's the Lighting Network promiseland.


I know that you know that most people want bigger blocks - sooner or later.
Why keep saying stuff like this?

Indeed.

Core makes BTC much faster (helps scaling) and resilient with 0.12, fixes malleability bug / introduces Segwit in a couple of months (1.7MB capacity) and commits to future blocksize increase that puts capacity at >2mb which classic provides. And we are still discussing "small blockers"? Why?

The amount of stirring shit for the lolz, resurrecting 5-10-20 day posts from the garbage, creating fictitious drama and "problems", saying that the end is coming because "blocks are full" when even 1c or even 4 tenths of one cent fee txs go in in a few hours despite "blocks are full" and backlogs, saying people can't be anonymous with bitcoin because with high fees there can't be no mixing (when fees are at practically zero cost AND the fact that cheap mixing is USELESS mixing due to the sybil attack vector where other parties can pretend to be mixing with you just to unmask you - I mean, if they pay almost zero fees, they can be pretending to be mixing coins all day so that they can see who else mixes with them), pretending there is some official camp that wants 1MB forevah and intentionally creating friction out of nowhere when there is no such camp (everyone is doing scaling work)....wtf? Are you all retarded and/or paid shills?

Blockstream/Core NEEDS segwit for their future plans. It fixes malleability, which could be fixed in a multitude of ways, but is CRITICAL for LN type scrip systems. Importantly, it gives a 75% fee discount to signature heavy transactions, economic favoritism for the settlement network. Most importantly, it only needs miners to soft fork it in, not nodes... non-upgraded nodes are left blissfully unable to verify segwit transactions (a "nice" bifurcation of the full node structure)... no node level referendum on Core's dominance. 1.7MB equiv is a rosy view... a slower uptake from outside developers integrating the changes into their apps means more like 1.3MB. They dangled the carrot of a HF in July 2017, just to get the miners to go along.

Fees aren't prohibitively expensive today... but that means we have near 0 potential for growth... it's not a coincidence that the exponential uptrend in price has been thoroughly broken. Also, no coincidence that alts are exploding (lucky iCE), taking massive share from BTC.

It's obvious to everyone after 6 months of debating that Blockstream wants a constrained on-chain environment to artificially incentivize off-chain solutions... which (totally incidentally) will siphon off miner fees to hub operators. How the fuck do you think Blockstream is gonna get an ROI on $76mm of loot?

Look... I'm not against a form of seg-wit in principle, nor off chain solutions... but they need to compete on a level playing field. I'm sick and tired of scare mongering, DDoS, and censorship being employed to steer this boat in the most favorable direction for Blockstream. It may be going there despite my protestations, but I'm not going to just shut up and get steamrolled without complaining loudly about it.

There's complaining and then there's running a classic node.  I'm at step 2. I agree with everything you just said, but I'm also concerned with mining concentration, which is why the Classic RoadMap is the only game in town.  

The Classic RoadMap is far better than I thought it would be.  It's not just a protest vote. It's a path back to real censorship resistance as well as scaling.  The bad guys fight with DDos attacks and censorship because they have no good arguments.  We have the laws of economics on our side and the moral high ground. Now we have our battle flag. Time to suit up.

Governance derives its just power from the consent of the governed. Classic has my consent.  Core does not.  That's all the justification i need because I'm an American and that's how we roll.



3683. Post 14013596 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Loss of censorship resistance is a bigger problem than lack of scalability. Classic addresses that. Core doesn't.

A vote for Core is a vote for the Communist Party of China.  That's not sloganeering. That's a direct consequence of not fixing mining concentration.

People are sick of arguing over blocksize? Fine. Let's argue over this.  

People may want to invest in a crypto controlled by the biggest currency manipulators in the world, but if they do, they'll make me rich in the process. Somehow, judging by the slipping value of the yuan, I doubt that will happen.

Like I said, it's my chain. If you want it, you're going to have to pay for it.  Or you can get cheap coins by helping us with the Classic option and then taking advantage of the market turbulence as the tide shifts. If Classic wins, expect a good chunk of those millions pouring into Etherium and other blockchain solutions to find their way into Bitcoin instead. Those cheap coins may not stay cheap very long.

Your call, really. I can live with either outcome. That's the advantage of being hedged.




3684. Post 14016895 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Blocks are full again. I think this will now probably happen any time the market tries to pump.

I don't see much upside but there's a lot of potential downside.




3685. Post 14019917 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: noobtrader on February 26, 2016, 06:13:55 PM
i just realize this :

 cost mining of 1 btc per month at current difficulty (for 12 c per kwh) is around 560 usd  for latest miner.   Shocked Shocked Shocked



I'm actually surprised it's that low, judging by the prices for antminer S7s. How did you arrive at that figure?

overdeveloped mining in China is creating a very unstable situation.



3686. Post 14020088 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

an S7 burns ~930960 watts of juice per month.

cost of electricity at 4C per kWh is then ~$37 for one miner.

Then there is the cost of:
buying the miner plus shipping
rackspace
installation and operation
bandwidth

Blockreward gets chopped in half in July.

It seems like a crazy risky business.

Risks include but not limited to:

defective product
Change of Pow (disaster)
theft, fire, flooding or other natural disaster
market collapse
environmental and other regulations
tech breakthrough that renders them obsolete

No wonder these miners are acting so crazy.




3687. Post 14027468 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 26, 2016, 08:29:59 PM
Blocks are full again. I think this will now probably happen any time the market tries to pump.

I don't see much upside but there's a lot of potential downside.



What's your source for this apparently pure conjecture?

Looks like we are generally down in the last days by nearly 15%, and even at 85% full, transactions were still going completely through with nearly no fees in less than 10 hours, and with fees in about an hour or so.

https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=60days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=



With less room to grow, there will be less growth. I don't see how that is avoidable.



3688. Post 14027821 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 27, 2016, 02:23:22 AM
[An update on the solar solo mine would be groovy too.]

When building a Solar power grid or using microhydro one must plan for peak electrical use. I prefer Microhydro, but the cost of solar is getting much cheaper every year. Normally, one would float charge batteries and than burn off extra electricity to heat water , but I find that solar water heaters are better suited for this task, and excess electricity that would normally be discarded is used to mine bitcoin.

What would be the best of all worlds is using those ASICs to heat water as well to close the loop and recycle the waste heat.

Originally and all the way up through the GPU era, mining was something that could be done profitably part time, so taking advantage of off-peak cheap electricity was an excellent use case. Now however, miners are so damn expensive, that if they are not running 24/7 you can run a real risk of never being able to recoup your capital investment.

It is a race to break even before your miners are obsolete, halving cuts revenue, or the market crashes. I guess if you live somewhere cold, you could still run obsolete mining equipment as a space heater, sell them as a curiosity or mine some altcoin with a SHA256 hashing protocol and a much lower difficulty, but other than that, it's a race.  

WE HAVE A CHICKEN AND EGG PROBLEM. Miners outside of China are reluctant to invest substantially in new mining gear because they face an uphill battle competing with Chinese mines with electricity and labor cost advantage.

Miners are also reluctant to build up because the code development uncertainty and scaling uncertainty.  It's hard to make long term plans with so many unknowns. So mining concentration may not be corrected until there is code development decentralization.

Then we have the problem that code development centralization (with Core) is an established practice, something that will not be easily changed, if at all.  Miners do not want to switch to Classic or other alternative because they fear (rightly IMHO) that a switch will cause market volatility or an outright crash.
They can't do something even if they know or suspect it is in their long-term best interest if they need to keep mining revenue high enough to pay for their gear operations in a shorter time period.

The vaccine could cause the death of the patient before it cures it. I think this is a risk worth taking, but I'm not a miner. It is up to them.  Without taking the medicine, there is limited potential for growth and price appreciation.

Any miners want to weigh in on this?

Mining concentration in China harms security, censorship resistance and network performance (due to limited bandwidth) It makes Bitcoin a less attractive investment. Only substantial changes to the code will change this, IMHO. Classic is really the only alternative, given Core's bias towards the status quo.



 




3689. Post 14028471 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 27, 2016, 02:31:24 PM

[An update on the solar solo mine would be groovy too.]

When building a Solar power grid or using microhydro one must plan for peak electrical use. I prefer Microhydro, but the cost of solar is getting much cheaper every year. Normally, one would float charge batteries and than burn off extra electricity to heat water , but I find that solar water heaters are better suited for this task, and excess electricity that would normally be discarded is used to mine bitcoin.

What would be the best of all worlds is using those ASICs to heat water as well to close the loop and recycle the waste heat.

Originally and all the way up through the GPU era, mining was something that could be done profitably part time, so taking advantage of off-peak cheap electricity was an excellent use case. Now however, miners are so damn expensive, that if they are not running 24/7 you can run a real risk of never being able to recoup your capital investment.

It is a race to break even before your miners are obsolete, halving cuts revenue, or the market crashes. I guess if you live somewhere cold, you could still run obsolete miners as a space heater, sell them as a curiosity or mine some altcoin with a SHA256 hashing protocol and a much lower difficulty, but other than that, it's a race.  

WE HAVE A CHICKEN AND EGG PROBLEM. Miners outside of China are reluctant to invest substantially in new mining gear because they face an uphill battle competing with Chinese mines with electricity and labor cost advantage.

Miners are also reluctant to build up because the code development uncertainty and scaling uncertainty.  It's hard to make long term plans with so many unknowns. So mining concentration may not be corrected until there is code development decentralization.

Then we have the problem that code development centralization (with Core) is an established practice, something that will not be easily changed, if at all.  Miners do not want to switch to Classic or other alternative because they fear (rightly IMHO) that a switch will cause market volatility or an outright crash.
They can't do something even if they know or suspect it is in their long-term best interest if they need to keep mining revenue high enough to pay for their gear operations in a shorter time period.

The vaccine could cause the death of the patient before it cures it. I think this is a risk worth taking, but I'm not a miner. It is up to them.  Without taking the medicine, there is limited potential for growth and price appreciation.

Any miners want to weigh in on this?

Not a miner, but someone who had to deal with off-the-grid (due to ...no grid being available) power (wind, solar, diesel, hydro) and water cooling (well... machined my own waterblocks, at least):

First, the reason that non-subsidized alt energy is not used more often is because -- yeah, it's a tremendous pain, and is far more expensive than being on the grid. The most practical off-the-grid power sources are gas/diesel generators. There even were some portable gas turbines, lol.  
Second, there's no need to convert electricity into heat to store it, because see here. Granted, you need a legal hookup & power meters.
Micro hydro is basically a joke, because you need head. like so:

It's great when there are no alternatives and you're lucky enough to be in *just the right place,* but it's not a paddle wheel in a stream hooked up to an car alternator.

Using hot water from waterblocks (how many commercial miners are currently water-cooled? Yeah, water cooling's expensive, that's why.) is a non-starter - think about plumbing farm, think how useful warm water is (not hot, if your chip's running at 120C, the water entering your water block is ~35C & exiting @ ~60C) , etc., etc.

TL;DR: Most people advocating shit like that don't know which end of the screwdriver to stick in a screw.

There are some remote locations where it may be possible to build this kind of setup profitably due to lack of regulations, lack of competition from the grid, constant demand due to cold climate, etc. but those areas also suffer from a lack of bandwidth that makes capitalizing on them for Bitcoin mining a non-starter.



3690. Post 14028938 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 27, 2016, 03:00:37 PM


You can run a farm on a mobile broadband connection if you're mining on a pool. And that won't change.

If there are cell towers 200 miles from Gnome, Alaska, I am not aware of it.

We NEED to adjust the code so high bandwidth is more of an advantage or China will continue to dominate mining, and we will never regain mining decentralization or censorship resistance. The alliance between the two entranched special interest groups Core and Chinese miners is a death sentence. At some point, scaling limitations will mean Bitcoin will lose it's first mover advantage and if that doesn't happen, eventually price appreciation will make Bitcoin a threat to PRC monetary/economic policy and there will be (another) crackdown, this time accompanied by possibly a series of 51% attacks. Then we'll lose first mover advantage anyway.

The Staus Quo is a time bomb. We just don't know when the counter is set.



3691. Post 14029160 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 27, 2016, 03:55:51 PM


You can run a farm on a mobile broadband connection if you're mining on a pool. And that won't change.

If there are cell towers 200 miles from Gnome, Alaska, I am not aware of it.
...

Mobile broadband was probably used as in "slow."
Quick search tells me that there are at least 2 internet providers in Nome, Alaska.
In my (unlerned) opinion, "decentralization" is no longer an issue, that bird has flown.

If we can't again achieve distributed mining, then the only thing left for me to do is try to find the best possible exit point to divest.

We are a gnat to the PRC. If we ever grow to the size of a horsefly, we will get swatted and we've given them the best possible flyswatter: >50% of mining hardware.

But even if the ChiComs decide to keep Bitcoin and use it for their own purposes, they could stop or even reverse halvings, create ways to track users, or something worse. If they control the longest chain, they can do whatever the hell they want.

If we are not a threat to the PRC, then Bitcoin has failed. If we are not capable of growing to the point where we could become a threat, then Bitcoin has failed. If we can't recognize this problem, then we won't do anything about it, and Bitcoin will fail.



3692. Post 14029504 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 27, 2016, 04:24:21 PM
...
OMG - you envision a fee market (long before it's neccessary), but you can not see the commoditization of mining equipment hence re-decentralization of mining!?

I don't understand what you mean. Explain?



You can run a farm on a mobile broadband connection if you're mining on a pool. And that won't change.

If there are cell towers 200 miles from Gnome, Alaska, I am not aware of it.
...

Mobile broadband was probably used as in "slow."
Quick search tells me that there are at least 2 internet providers in Nome, Alaska.
In my (unlerned) opinion, "decentralization" is no longer an issue, that bird has flown.

If we can't again achieve distributed mining, then the only thing left for me to do is try to find the best possible exit point to divest.

We are a gnat to the PRC. If we ever grow to the size of a horsefly, we will get swatted and we've given them the best possible flyswatter: >50% of mining hardware.

For me, that exit point was a long time ago.

You may easily be right, but the pumpmonkeys are doing their thing right now, and I think I can do a little better than $450. There's a lot of momentum.



3693. Post 14029840 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: 8up on February 27, 2016, 04:57:21 PM
...
OMG - you envision a fee market (long before it's neccessary), but you can not see the commoditization of mining equipment hence re-decentralization of mining!?

I don't understand what you mean. Explain?

If I remember right, there is even a paper written on this topic. But for the start, this should work: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2o71hh/physics_and_economics_will_distributed_mining_im/

Mining concentration isn't solely a product of unequal access to hardware and economies of scale. China's electricity and labor cost advantages contribute, as well as f*cked up code that actually gives them a competitive advantage for crappy bandwidth (selfish mining). The alliance between miners and Core ensures this will likely continue unless and until Classic or something like it gets node supermajority. That's a low probability outcome and a dangerous bet, IMHO.



3694. Post 14032355 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 27, 2016, 08:21:54 PM
When you really sit down and work through possible options with businesses, as I have done, they typically don't want on-chain scaling.

Think about it: if you are a business, why would you want a solution that involves your competitors being able to figure out how much you are paying your suppliers, or how much your customers are spending on your product? On-chain bitcoin transactions, even when used well, do a piss-poor job of hiding this information. I know it may run counter to the mob wisdom of this subreddit, but this is actually preventing a number of industries from adopting bitcoin.


Business types. Angry
https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/47kme0/bitcoin_classic_2016_roadmap_announcement/d0ewnqb


What's ideal of course is the option of anonymity or radical transparency, which you can only have with on-chain scaling. You can't cheaply mix coins with high transaction costs.  LN payment channels increase transparency because rarely are your vendors and customers the same people, so you deal with third party middlemen who are all up in your bidness.



3695. Post 14032447 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 27, 2016, 08:35:46 PM
... system used for central heating for nearby houses or office buildings. 40-60 degrees celsius through radiators makes sense. ...
Forced hot water heat temp is 82-98C. 40-60 for radiant heat (not really common).
Would have to be fairly special houses -- central heating (for apartments) usually means *steam* heat (convenient, because no return pipes with steam).

That's part of the problem. It's difficult to retro-install the systems, you basically have to build the neighborhood at the same time as you build the data center. I can't find where I got this from but i think they might have used underfloor heating.

I'd like to chime in on this. without an expensive series of closed loop systems or a constant source of cold freshwater, you're gonna need a system which utilizes the Latent Heat of Vaporization to get enough heat out to work and be cost-effective. That's going to be difficult to do when your coolant has a boiling temp of 100 degrees Celsius at 1 atm pressure.  It's doable, but there's no money in it.

You'd need a secondary coolant system with some kind of refrigerant in it with a much lower boiling temp, a heat exchanger, pumps, valves and piping. Then you need a power source for the pumps.  ROI on this kind of investment is calculated in decades, not years.

I was a nuke plant operator and you constantly have to explain to engineers that something being technically possible and being economically viable are two entirely different things.  



3696. Post 14036282 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Most people have a natural instinctive preference for those with less genetic distance.  Evolution would seem to make this almost a requirement. I don't see what that has to do with Bitcoin.

I'm a white guy. Pure white, but what the hell does that even mean? I'm actually part Celtic, Norman. Saxon, Teutonic whatever. These are arbitrary things. lines are blurry, not black and white. There's no one place to draw the lines.

Well, maybe one place. Personal property lines. That's something that we can make clear with blockchain title registry. Then you and yours can be as racist or as inclusive on your own property as you want and I can do the same.  I just won't invite you to my daughter's Quinceañera. 



3697. Post 14038548 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Slavery existed since the dawn of history in every culture and civilization. It was ended by white guys, that's something to be proud of.

They developed the scientific method.  Newton's physics. Adam Smith's economics, chemistry, medicine, engineering.  Fritz Haber's process for fixing nitrogen out of the air almost doubled world crop yields. Von Braun's rockets sent us to the moon.

They developed and or advanced the concepts of property rights, individual rights, women's rights, consent of the governed, due process, jury trials...

We wouldn't have the technology to or the political freedom to argue on the internet without those advancements. 

White guys have also done a lot of evil, but what group hasn't? The Earth is four billion years old and humanity is 100,000 years old at most. In evolutionary terms, we've just crawled down from the trees. We're barely more than animals.  So quit trying to shame whites with guilt. Only people with a conscience can be shamed in the first place, so you must know your your tactic is either futile or it's a lie.



3698. Post 14040141 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 28, 2016, 05:18:17 PM
...
As I expected, the little pump hit heavy resistance, and now we have a nice dump.
Hard crash could start tomorrow, now it's a bit early IMO, needs to break support at 415$ to persuade the panic sellers.

I'm glad that you seem to have been only partially correct on this.

and we seem to be back on our way up?  There may be a decent possibility that we break through the $438, this time and give $448 a run for its money...

Then comes $467... I am having my doubts about being able to penetrate either the $448 or the $467 in the coming several days, but never say never in bitcoinlandia.

Yeah, this doesn't look bearish, so IMO no crashing today, and if 12h MACD divergence turns green, it's possible to break 450$, later 500$... Angry

Bear raids are pretty weak beans these days.

Currently blaming: [Liquid sidechain]

 Angry

Is that even up and running yet?



3699. Post 14040177 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 28, 2016, 05:18:17 PM
...
As I expected, the little pump hit heavy resistance, and now we have a nice dump.
Hard crash could start tomorrow, now it's a bit early IMO, needs to break support at 415$ to persuade the panic sellers.

I'm glad that you seem to have been only partially correct on this.

and we seem to be back on our way up?  There may be a decent possibility that we break through the $438, this time and give $448 a run for its money...

Then comes $467... I am having my doubts about being able to penetrate either the $448 or the $467 in the coming several days, but never say never in bitcoinlandia.

Yeah, this doesn't look bearish, so IMO no crashing today, and if 12h MACD divergence turns green, it's possible to break 450$, later 500$... Angry

Bear raids are pretty weak beans these days.

Currently blaming: [Liquid sidechain]

 Angry

all I see is $25 million in leveraged longs compared to 12K BTC shorts. That's money for the taking for anyone with a big enough bankroll.



3700. Post 14043432 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: yefi on February 28, 2016, 07:17:56 PM
They [white guys] developed the scientific method.  Newton's physics. Adam Smith's economics, chemistry, medicine, engineering. 

And let's not forget a knack for taking all the credit.

We take credit, but not all credit. We deserve no credit?



3701. Post 14043614 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: nioc on February 29, 2016, 12:51:33 AM
@BJA, FWIW this is from a live blog from one of the participants of the just concluded Satoshi roundtable

27 Feb 4:28 PM A suggestion was made for mining companies to consider moving some of their mining equipment to different jurisdictions to reduce the clustering of mining /u/fluffyponyza

I don't know how you reconcile this suggestion with the mining companies monetary self interest.

I saw that. It would be in their long term best interest to get most mining outside China, because if the majority of mining hardware is outside China, then seizing what is left is pointless for the PRC. All they could do is destroy it and reduce the difficulty for non-Chinese miners.

It's just a suggestion and I don't think the miners are forward-thinking enough to go for it. They are more worried about losing their dominant mining position than a nationalization and 51% attack.  This is naive.






3702. Post 14044401 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: bobabouey2 on February 29, 2016, 02:01:58 AM
What, did Bruce Fenton just solve consensus?

Big Factom deal in China. The deal implies Chinese authorities are cool with Bitcoin, or they wouldn't be using our blockchain for title registry.  The problem of course is that blocksize is too small for it to work. 



3703. Post 14050504 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Regarding fees and blocksize:
People use the best option they have until a better option materializes. This should be obvious. What is going to prevent people from using an altcoin when one becomes a better option, other than censorship and DDoS attacks? 

I watch Shark Tank and it has given me a good idea how successful investors think. Is the idea proprietary? What is the barrier to entry for competition? Is management skilled and motivated?

If you are not investing in a proprietary idea, You have to be investing in the skills/motivation/track record of management. If you aren't investing in at least one of those two things, you are throwing money away.

So knowing that, is Bitcoin a good investment?





3704. Post 14051555 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: BitUsher on February 29, 2016, 05:34:24 PM
Regarding fees and blocksize:
People use the best option they have until a better option materializes. This should be obvious. What is going to prevent people from using an altcoin when one becomes a better option, other than censorship and DDoS attacks?  

I watch Shark Tank and it has given me a good idea how successful investors think. Is the idea proprietary? What is the barrier to entry for competition? Is management skilled and motivated?

If you are not investing in a proprietary idea, You have to be investing in the skills/motivation/track record of management. If you aren't investing in at least one of those two things, you are throwing money away.

So knowing that, is Bitcoin a good investment?


All other altcoins are primarily used for speculation alone and have little if not any utility. One has to take a "shapeshift" exchange cut to even spend them. This could change in 5-10 years, no doubt, but it is unwise for people to recommend others to gamble into a testnet scam rather than simply offloading to fiat if they are unhappy with bitcoin. If someone wants to invest in an altcoin because they really believe in it and understand it than so be it... but those threatening to divest into ETH* are mainly doing so as a scare tactic.

No matter how big the blocksize is won't solve our problems. We can still easily doublespend 0 conf txs (without RBF), and waiting 2-3 conf (min recommended) isn't fast enough and will never allow bitcoin to go mainstream. We need Segwit ASAP and multiple payment channel solutions to allow for secure instant tx's and scalability. Allowing spam to drop off and go offchain temporarily is a good thing and will motivate our community to use payment channels instead of simply stuffing everything in a block in a sloppy manner.  

* I would love to hear of a hypothetical use case of Ethereum that wouldn't be better done through Bitcoin or Oracles.

That doesn't really answer my question. I wasn't just asking if Bitcoin is a good investment relative to Etherium. In some cases, it may be, depending on a person's risk tolerance, how long they want to hold it, etc,  but whether or not Bitcoin was something you could sell to the sharks on Shark Tank.  I don't think I could because I would have to sell a management team that frankly embarrasses me.

Utility is an argument for using Bitcoin, not for investing in it.  For that we would have to know what Bitcoin's future utility would likely be relative to alternatives.  That's unknown and honestly unknowable with current leadership. 

So you're right. This isn't just about blocksize. It's about leadership. We all agree that Bitcoin shouldn't be ruled by anyone, but without rulers, leaders become MORE important, not less.  Someone has to sell their vision well enough that consensus can form around it. That isn't accomplished by DDoS attacks and censorship. It's not achieved with flame wars, character assassinations, market manipulations or stalling tactics. It's achieved by good old-fashioned leadership. Until competent leadership emerges, Bitcoin will probably not be a good investment.




3705. Post 14056019 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

If we took the currency issue out of this conflict, it would look something like this:

Chipherpunk A builds a permanent immutable database and wants to charge people to write to it because he doesn't want it to fill up with crap.

Cipherpunk B builds a permanent immutable database and he lets anybody write anything to it because that's what free speech really is.

Smallblockers are the censors who see themselves as the guardians of free speech. They want to guard free speech with censorship.  If you elect yourself the arbiter of what is and is not spam, you are practicing censorship.  If you charge people for writing on a public wall you are a censor.

I think smallblockers see themselves more as publishers, people who have not only the right but the responsibility to ensure only quality things get printed, given the real cost of printing. This would be true if Bitcoin was a private good, but it is not. It is a public good, in the economic sense.

Smallblockers are just another form of censorship for crypto to overcome, either by routing around Core or routing around Bitcoin. 



3706. Post 14056895 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 01, 2016, 05:36:58 AM
If we took the currency issue out of this conflict, it would look something like this:

Chipherpunk A builds a permanent immutable database and wants to charge people to write to it because he doesn't want it to fill up with crap.

Cipherpunk B builds a permanent immutable database and he lets anybody write anything to it because that's what free speech really is.

Smallblockers are the censors who see themselves as the guardians of free speech. They want to guard free speech with censorship.  If you elect yourself the arbiter of what is and is not spam, you are practicing censorship.  If you charge people for writing on a public wall you are a censor.

I think smallblockers see themselves more as publishers, people who have not only the right but the responsibility to ensure only quality things get printed, given the real cost of printing. This would be true if Bitcoin was a private good, but it is not. It is a public good, in the economic sense.

Smallblockers are just another form of censorship for crypto to overcome, either by routing around Core or routing around Bitcoin.  


tl;dr govvy troll muddies the waters by mixing up "free as in beer" and "free as in freedom" into a witches brew of psy-op misinformation

I very specifically and intentionally did not do that.

Quote
pub·lic good
noun
1.
ECONOMICS
a commodity or service that is provided without profit to all members of a society, either by the government or a private individual or organization.
"a conviction that library informational services are a public good, not a commercial commodity"

You are conflating a qualitative and quantitative limit on transactions. YOU are the one confusing "free as in beer" and "free as in freedom".  A $10 remittance to an impoverished family member may be more important than a $1000 dice bet by a millionaire due to marginal utility. It may or may not be. That isn't for me or you to determine.  By forcing one of those two transactions off the network (because fees do not increase capacity), you are giving rich people an artificial advantage over poor people in addition to the natural advantages they already posses.   You've turned Bitcoin into just another tool of oppression.

Because Bitcoin is a public good, and because the Law of Marginal Utility applies to money just like any other commodity, an artificial fee market amounts to a regressive tax. You've turned Bitcoin into just another tool of oppression.



3707. Post 14057325 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on March 01, 2016, 08:01:54 AM
-snip-
Because Bitcoin is a public good, and because the Law of Marginal Utility applies to money just like any other commodity, an artificial fee market amounts to a regressive tax. You've turned Bitcoin into just another tool of oppression.


Bitcoin isn't a public good. It is not provided without profit to all members of society...

Space to include your transaction is a product, and it is provided by private companies, for a profit, either directly or indirectly.

I get the gist of where you're trying to go, but it's just not working, try again.

There is no direct profit in running a node. It is a concentrated cost for which there is a distributed benefit.
Satoshi didn't sell the white paper. He gave it to us. We do not pay the code developers. They are volunteers. 

A public square is a public good, no matter how many hotdog and snow cone vendors operate there.  Miners are in it for profits, just like the construction company that is contracted to build a public road. Doesn't negate the fact that the road is a public good. Neither does commercial traffic on the road. This is just a definition in economics. 

Space to include your transaction is a resource, like water, that may or may not be a commodity depending on the circumstances.



3708. Post 14057846 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on March 01, 2016, 08:56:31 AM
-snip-
Because Bitcoin is a public good, and because the Law of Marginal Utility applies to money just like any other commodity, an artificial fee market amounts to a regressive tax. You've turned Bitcoin into just another tool of oppression.


Bitcoin isn't a public good. It is not provided without profit to all members of society...

Space to include your transaction is a product, and it is provided by private companies, for a profit, either directly or indirectly.

I get the gist of where you're trying to go, but it's just not working, try again.

There is no direct profit in running a node. It is a concentrated cost for which there is a distributed benefit.
Satoshi didn't sell the white paper. He gave it to us. We do not pay the code developers. They are volunteers.  

Non-mining-nodes are not charities, they are a secure and somewhat private method to interact with the network. Some are also run because the admin has an interest in the overall health of the network and its potential peers. Self-interested participants, not volunteers at the Children's Hospital. I won't be so uncharitable to say that their main role is that of a dude standing at the toll booth, deciding whether or not to pass your toll to the toll collector... but there's an element of that.

Mark my words, miners will employ their own developers, just like Blockstream, who beat them to the punch...

A public square is a public good, no matter how many hotdog and snow cone vendors operate there.  Miners are in it for profits, just like the construction company that is contracted to build a public road. Doesn't negate the fact that the road is a public good. Neither does commercial traffic on the road. This is just a definition in economics.  

Miners aren't construction companies, their job isn't done after laying the 'crete. They are toll road operators, they (should) choose the toll prices and provide security along the road on which you're a travellin'.

Space to include your transaction is a resource, like water, that may or may not be a commodity depending on the circumstances.

Blockspace is a commodity, there are other providers of somewhat similar commodities that you may choose to satisfy your needs and desires, but this not public square here for you to urinate in, unless they let you.

Everybody is self-interested, even charity hospital volunteers and philanthropists. The discipline of economics uses very specific definitions, precisely so economists won't waste time in stupid arguments like this but can move on to more substantive things. You are not making an economic argument. You are making a philosophical argument. I am not even remotely interested in engaging in that. I don't want to re-invent the wheel or take the time to learn some Objectivist secret code words.

An open-source, permissionless network is a public good, regardless of who pays for it or who profits from it. This isn't my opinion. This is simply a classification in the field of political economy. It's not a classification category I just made up or tweaked the definition for my own ends. If you don't like the terms economists use, then don't use them, but you can't say that they are wrong. A term means what people agree it means, what people use it to mean. You can try an tell a biologist that an elephant isn't a mammal because it has a trunk and he'll just look at you funny. It's not even coherent enough to be wrong.




3709. Post 14108340 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

28 million in leveraged longs on BFX. Shorts barely changed.  This is a dangerously unstable situation.  Every one of those longs have to close at some point, either at a profit or a loss. It amounts to massive overhead resistance.

Where the hell is the pump gonna come from? Halving is priced in. SegWit is priced in even though it may not happen or happen on a longer time frame than expected.  Global economic stability? Bitcoin lost 5% in a day, hardly a safe haven asset, especially given the current governance situation.

Bitcoin is a honeybadger, so price may go up, but if it does, it will be in spite of fundamentals, not because of them.  There can be no sustainable rise without a permanent scaling solution.



3710. Post 14108787 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: Tzupy on March 05, 2016, 08:28:38 PM
28 million in leveraged longs on BFX. Shorts barely changed.  This is a dangerously unstable situation.  Every one of those longs have to close at some point, either at a profit or a loss. It amounts to massive overhead resistance.

Where the hell is the pump gonna come from? Halving is priced in. SegWit is priced in even though it may not happen or happen on a longer time frame than expected.  Global economic stability? Bitcoin lost 5% in a day, hardly a safe haven asset, especially given the current governance situation.

Bitcoin is a honeybadger, so price may go up, but if it does, it will be in spite of fundamentals, not because of them.  There can be no sustainable rise without a permanent scaling solution.

The most important part is that 8 M$ are new longs opened since 21st February, when price was 450$, so they are underwater now, and more down could trigger a long squeeze.

I noticed that.  One thing I do notice is that since the great 2013 bubble, there has never been two consecutive short squeezes or long squeezes. They ALWAYS happen short, long, short, long. The last one was the short squeeze to $502.  The longs are due.  Still, patterns continue until they don't. 



3711. Post 14111655 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: gentlemand on March 06, 2016, 02:16:15 AM
There's a fella on r/btc doing a sterling job bringing the Chinese side of things to life. Here's his latest summary of Jihan Wu from Antpool's post on 8btc - https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/495866/the_rbtc_china_dispatch_11_summary_selected/



What seems bizarre to me is that the HK CRTA comes out and the market shoots up from $375 to $450, a seventy five dollar increase. Then pools start coming out one at a time making it clear there is no consensus, and the market only retraces 60 bucks.

It seems like there should be more than a complete retrace.  28.4 million in leveraged longs on BFX. It seems crazy to say this, especially so close to the halving, but I think there is a real possibility that $300 will get another serious test of support.  There is still too much uncertainty with scaling and governance. 



3712. Post 14115271 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 06, 2016, 11:48:20 AM
There's a fella on r/btc doing a sterling job bringing the Chinese side of things to life. Here's his latest summary of Jihan Wu from Antpool's post on 8btc - https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/495866/the_rbtc_china_dispatch_11_summary_selected/



What seems bizarre to me is that the HK CRTA comes out and the market shoots up from $375 to $450, a seventy five dollar increase. Then pools start coming out one at a time making it clear there is no consensus, and the market only retraces 60 bucks.

It seems like there should be more than a complete retrace.  28.4 million in leveraged longs on BFX. It seems crazy to say this, especially so close to the halving, but I think there is a real possibility that $300 will get another serious test of support.  There is still too much uncertainty with scaling and governance. 


Were you able to close those shorts that you had opened in the $370s and $380s?   Oh?  why am i asking?  it seems you are still predicting $300, so probably, you have not closed those shorts, yet.  Oh well... It's starting to seem more and more like $382 may have been the bottom... at least for now...

My short is a hedge because I am way too heavy and undiversified, having almost my entire life savings in Bitcoin. I WANT that short to blow up. It is a hedge. So no, I didn't close it and I won't until and unless it
1) blows up
2) I can see some tangible progress on the scaling, governance and mining concentration problems
3) there is a real, honest to goodness long squeeze.



3713. Post 14120029 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Zero cost abuse is an economic problem if it is a problem at all and not a security problem. It's like stores giving out free samples. Sure, some customers may abuse it, but others get introduced to a product they may not otherwise buy. It's up to the individual store owners to make the best policy on free samples, not the government.

In our case, it should be up to the miners and not Core to decide how many free transactions to include.

Same argument applies to loss leaders and near zero free transactions. Miners may figure this out eventually, but in the mean time volatility and profits to the smart and the lucky.



3714. Post 14120447 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 07, 2016, 01:35:56 AM

oh no here comes another test of 400

Quote
There were a couple of key moments that I remember. At one point, everybody was asked if they supported the “Hong Kong compromise” from the week before (segregated witness in April, then code for a 2MB hard fork in July of 2016 with a minimum of a year before 2MB blocks are allowed).

“Everybody who support that, raise your hand” : a dozen or so people, most of whom were part of that Hong Kong meeting, raise their hands.

“Everybody who does not support that, raise your hand” : everybody else (forty? fifty people?) raises their hands.

There was a lot of talk about moving the July of 2017 date closer. In particular, a plan was presented that had a three month grace period after 95% of hashpower voted yes and 75% of coin-age-weighted-transaction-volume-in-some-time-period also indicated support.

well it seems very little poeple actually agree with the “Hong Kong compromise”, everyone has their own idea of exactly how it should all go down in history.

this is horrible news...

Of course we don't agree. I support the compromise only because it would force Core to change it's requirement of unanimous consent to any big change. Either that or they renege on the deal and can be jettisoned from any future serious discussions. The terms are absolutely crappy. SegWit should be a hard fork. 2 MB needs to happen by the halving. 

I would say a test of $300 would be more appropriate than merely $400, but this is Bitcoin, so who the hell knows? One million of the 8 million in recent leverged longs on BFX has closed already. That leaves only about another 17000 coins to be sold before overhead resistance is back to normal levels.



3715. Post 14120713 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: MinermanNC on March 07, 2016, 02:38:33 AM
wow that's actually pretty good, especially the pleading parts lol  Grin

at the end of the day its the miners that will decide,,, just "fork" it  Shocked
lol,  fuck ya buddy!

JUST FORK IT


Grin

Miners ain't gonna fork it because it would cause a crash. Miners are not in charge. The market is in charge.  WE have to crash it or miners won't do shit.  But nobody wants to do it because of FOMO. 



3716. Post 14129470 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

These smallblocker arguments are demostrably stupid. If You were a malicious spammer, your goal would be to cause the most amount of damage, to achieve the most amount of service disruption for your buck, right?
So why the hell would it matter if you paid 10,000 1 cent fees or 5,000 two cent fees?  If anything 5,000 two cent fees would be slightly easier and that's what you need to do with small blocks.  Effectively there is no difference in the cost to disrupt service.  

The simple fact is that it's easier to disrupt a network that is already running close to capacity than one that has more excess capacity. That should be intuitively obvious to anyone without a mental handicap. Think about it: would it be easier to cause a traffic jam during rush hour or at 3 AM?

If your goal is to make the chain so bloated that nodes drop off, your challenge is to cause more damage than it cost to do it, but hard drive space is really cheap and getting cheaper, so it's always gonna cost you more to harm the network than the damage you produce.  So bloat the chain, morons. You're making us money.

So what WOULD discourage a malicious spammer? Only one thing I can think of: make the network so shitty and unreliable, so pathetic that it's not worth the effort to harm.  This is apparently the Core dev's strategy.

There is no cryptographically sound way to distinguish between spam and legitimate transactions. You cannot discourage one without also discouraging the other. Spam is just a cost of doing business.  The sooner we learn to live with it, the sooner we can get on to real problems that need to be addressed and CAN be fixed.

Problems like:
1.Mining being overwhelmingly concentrated in a single communist country.
2.Faulty code that actually gives those miners a selfish mining advantage for having limited bandwidth behind the Great Firewall.
3.Developer governance rules that give any small group effective veto power over any upgrades
4.Emerging altcoin competition that has applied the lessons learned from Bitcoin's problems to develop superior cryptocurrencies.



3717. Post 14129711 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: AlexGR on March 07, 2016, 11:00:33 PM
The simple fact is that it's easier to disrupt a network that is already running close to capacity than one that has more excess capacity. That should be intuitively obvious to anyone without a mental handicap.

LOL well put.
I'm going to keep that one in my back pocket.

He forgot the bloat part which is achieved with less cost when the network has ample capacity.

If normal use, is, say, 500-700kb and the rest is spam that goes in for cheap, then instead of a spammer filling 300-500kb of spam for free/near free, he gets to increase that to 1300-1500, which is 3-4x.

I did not forget the bloat cost. I addressed that.  Hard drive space is so cheap and getting cheaper that any damage caused by bloat will cost the attacker more than the network.  It currently costs ~ $5,000 in fees to bloat the blockchain by 1 GB.  Harddrive space is about 30 cents a GB (and getting cheaper), so with 10,000 nodes, it costs $3,000.  It costs 5 grand to cause less than 3 grand worth of damage. This may not be satisfactory to some, but it makes this kind of attack a much smaller worry than other problems that we need to be dealing with.



3718. Post 14130017 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: AlexGR on March 07, 2016, 11:24:12 PM
The simple fact is that it's easier to disrupt a network that is already running close to capacity than one that has more excess capacity. That should be intuitively obvious to anyone without a mental handicap.

LOL well put.
I'm going to keep that one in my back pocket.

He forgot the bloat part which is achieved with less cost when the network has ample capacity.

If normal use, is, say, 500-700kb and the rest is spam that goes in for cheap, then instead of a spammer filling 300-500kb of spam for free/near free, he gets to increase that to 1300-1500, which is 3-4x.

I did not forget the bloat cost. I addressed that.  Hard drive space is so cheap and getting cheaper that any damage caused by bloat will cost the attacker more than the network.  It currently costs ~ $5,000 in fees to bloat the blockchain by 1 GB.  Harddrive space is about 30 cents a GB (and getting cheaper), so with 10,000 nodes, it costs $3,000.  It costs 5 grand to cause less than 3 grand worth of damage. This may not be satisfactory to some, but it makes this kind of attack a much smaller worry than other problems that we need to be dealing with.

The bloat cost creates

1) storage costs
2) bandwidth costs (as this 1gb or 10gb or 100gb must be downloaded and served over and over in the network - for decades)
3) processing costs / power costs (for decades)
4) I/O slowdowns (if the blockchain can't fit in anymore in an affordable SSD you'll have to rely on a mechanical disk which is slow)
5) centralization cost as nodes have to drop out, increasing costs to the fewer nodes that remain. It's a vicious cycle where the less you have, the more the costs, plus you now become an easier target for DDOSing (more costs)

As for the problems that we may need to worry, these are what exactly? That txs without a few cents in fees won't go in in the next block? That's all there is to it.

Bandwidth is a one time cost per node. Once you have downloaded the blockchain, you only need to add to it, not download it again for each new block.  My ISP charges me a flat fee, but if you amortized it, it would be something like $0.05 for a 1 GB download at the most.  Multiply that by 10K nodes and you still have a cost to the network of <$500.  These are conservative numbers. We really only have about what, 8K nodes?

Trivial cost increases do not cause nodes to drop out. What causes that is a subjective value to the node operator that the cost exceeds the perceived benefit.  Bloat costs only come into play at the margins and are dwarfed by more relevant factors, such as using a node as a voting mechanism, securing transactions as part of a business, independent transaction verification, etc.   

We do not have the luxury of endlessly fretting over every perceived threat. There are too many. Node centralization is a real concern, but we have to prioritize. Many feel that code ossification and development centralization is a much greater threat considering increased altcoin competition.  What is Core doing to address the mining concentration problem? Anything? if so, I am not aware of it. They are still working on transaction maleablity, for Christ's sake, a problem that should have been fixed years ago.

Network congestion is a bigger problem than node centralization for the same reason that traffic jams are a bigger problem than potentially corrupt highway police.  A single traffic jam causes thousands of man-hours in lost productivity while a crooked traffic cop could cause dozens or maybe hundreds in the same amount of time.  People often intentionally drive through known speed traps to route around traffic gridlock. When faced with a choice of several suboptimal choices for getting from point A to Point B, people rationally choose the path of least resistance.



3719. Post 14190847 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

There are three fundamental problems with Bitcoin, any one of which will prevent a new ATH and allow a competitor to overtake our market cap: Governance, scaling and mining concentration in China.

Taken together, they could be catastrophic.

Like competing fishermen overfishing a lake that nobody owns, miners have a perverse incentive to maintain a status quo that they know will ultimately be fatal to their enterprise. 



3720. Post 14191093 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

1.37 million$ in new leveraged longs on BFX, or the vast majority of this late weekend pump all done by leveraged boobs with no more fiat left to pump with. Good luck with that.



3721. Post 14193055 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 14, 2016, 09:16:44 AM
Wot?

Adam is fired??


Firing seems a bit much.

On the other hand, some of his posts (maybe up to 10% of them or so) were getting a bit crazy in terms of spreading fucd in relation to achieving Bitcoin consensus.

Who's gonna make the weekly polls, now?

Maybe the rumor is not true?

Buddy, You have to know that you're stupid, right? I mean you sort of recognize those patient tolerant looks you get from people you know to be smart. Deep down you know you just don't have the cognitive horsepower. You try to tell yourself that your feels are just as important as those smartypant's thinks and in truth maybe they are, but they're not the same thing, are they?  I don't have a problem with stupid people. I work with stupid people everyday and we usually get along fine. Nobody at the firestation is trying to write a white paper critical of string theory. The problem I have is with stupid people who don't know they're stupid. These are the truly dangerous people who vote for sociopaths and give all sorts of terrible advice.

Just tell me you know how dumb you are so I can relax and feel better, because otherwise I'm afraid you may be a threat to yourself and others.  or don't even tell me. Why should you care if I feel better? Just be honest with yourself. It's not the end of the world. everybody has limitations. You're probably nice to your family and kind to animals. It's not your fault that you can't process information very well, recognize patterns or apply logic to premises to gain a valid conclusion.

It hurts my brain to follow your muddled disorganized thought processes whenever I read your writing. I can do it, but i just don't enjoy it. I have to tell most of my brain to do something else when I do it. it's like watching a Shakespeare performance by a stutterer or listening to a tone deaf person sing.

I'm sure you're good at something, just not at thinking. Find that thing and do it.



3722. Post 14200801 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 14, 2016, 06:46:16 PM
Wot?

Adam is fired??


Firing seems a bit much.

On the other hand, some of his posts (maybe up to 10% of them or so) were getting a bit crazy in terms of spreading fucd in relation to achieving Bitcoin consensus.

Who's gonna make the weekly polls, now?

Maybe the rumor is not true?

Buddy, You have to know that you're stupid, right? I mean you sort of recognize those patient tolerant looks you get from people you know to be smart. Deep down you know you just don't have the cognitive horsepower. You try to tell yourself that your feels are just as important as those smartypant's thinks and in truth maybe they are, but they're not the same thing, are they?  I don't have a problem with stupid people. I work with stupid people everyday and we usually get along fine. Nobody at the firestation is trying to write a white paper critical of string theory. The problem I have is with stupid people who don't know they're stupid. These are the truly dangerous people who vote for sociopaths and give all sorts of terrible advice.



Actually, this is one of the dummiest posts that I ever read.

I am wondering what, in regards to my above post, sparked your post to proclaim thou art more smarter?

In essence, I am in no competition regarding smartiness.

Generally, I agree with you about the annoyance of people who attempt to go beyond their competence, but overall, I tend to have a pretty high tolerance of differences.

I have a practice in which I attempt NOT to give any advice to anyone except to the extent that they may be asking me, and even if asked, I tend to be reserved with my dolling out advice.  Accordingly, I am of the perception that each person needs to choose his/her own path.



Just tell me you know how dumb you are so I can relax and feel better, because otherwise I'm afraid you may be a threat to yourself and others.  or don't even tell me. Why should you care if I feel better? Just be honest with yourself. It's not the end of the world. everybody has limitations. You're probably nice to your family and kind to animals. It's not your fault that you can't process information very well, recognize patterns or apply logic to premises to gain a valid conclusion.

Is there any substance to your post?




It hurts my brain to follow your muddled disorganized thought processes whenever I read your writing. I can do it, but i just don't enjoy it.

It's your choice regarding which posts you choose to read.  Personally, I tend to not read posts that I do not enjoy.




I have to tell most of my brain to do something else when I do it. it's like watching a Shakespeare performance by a stutterer or listening to a tone deaf person sing.



Well, at least you have some strategies that may be helpful to you regarding this practice of yours.





I'm sure you're good at something, just not at thinking. Find that thing and do it.

I agree with you.  Most people have some things that they are better at than others.  Some people can learn, and get better, and other people are only going to become so good at any thing that they attempt.  There are also people who lack focus, and never really get too good at anything.

I am pretty good (above average) at a few things. Sometimes I do those things that I am good at, and other times, I attempt to learn new things.

What I am trying to say is that you have a tragic inability to understand the effect you have on people who have the misfortune of your company.  I am not attempting to be substantive because I know that it is futile.  You're too dumb to even know how dumb you are. It's not that you are unconvinced of your lack of intelligence. It's that you are unconvincible. It's like you've turned being a moron into a superpower. It's vexing. In a less civilized society this could perhaps be resolved with blunt force trauma to your cranium, but all we can do is suffer your existence.

You're the real world equivalent of Scrappy Doo.



3723. Post 14201077 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 15, 2016, 03:51:13 AM
Wot?

Adam is fired??


Firing seems a bit much.

On the other hand, some of his posts (maybe up to 10% of them or so) were getting a bit crazy in terms of spreading fucd in relation to achieving Bitcoin consensus.

Who's gonna make the weekly polls, now?

Maybe the rumor is not true?

Buddy, You have to know that you're stupid, right? I mean you sort of recognize those patient tolerant looks you get from people you know to be smart. Deep down you know you just don't have the cognitive horsepower. You try to tell yourself that your feels are just as important as those smartypant's thinks and in truth maybe they are, but they're not the same thing, are they?  I don't have a problem with stupid people. I work with stupid people everyday and we usually get along fine. Nobody at the firestation is trying to write a white paper critical of string theory. The problem I have is with stupid people who don't know they're stupid. These are the truly dangerous people who vote for sociopaths and give all sorts of terrible advice.



Actually, this is one of the dummiest posts that I ever read.

I am wondering what, in regards to my above post, sparked your post to proclaim thou art more smarter?

In essence, I am in no competition regarding smartiness.

Generally, I agree with you about the annoyance of people who attempt to go beyond their competence, but overall, I tend to have a pretty high tolerance of differences.

I have a practice in which I attempt NOT to give any advice to anyone except to the extent that they may be asking me, and even if asked, I tend to be reserved with my dolling out advice.  Accordingly, I am of the perception that each person needs to choose his/her own path.



Just tell me you know how dumb you are so I can relax and feel better, because otherwise I'm afraid you may be a threat to yourself and others.  or don't even tell me. Why should you care if I feel better? Just be honest with yourself. It's not the end of the world. everybody has limitations. You're probably nice to your family and kind to animals. It's not your fault that you can't process information very well, recognize patterns or apply logic to premises to gain a valid conclusion.

Is there any substance to your post?




It hurts my brain to follow your muddled disorganized thought processes whenever I read your writing. I can do it, but i just don't enjoy it.

It's your choice regarding which posts you choose to read.  Personally, I tend to not read posts that I do not enjoy.




I have to tell most of my brain to do something else when I do it. it's like watching a Shakespeare performance by a stutterer or listening to a tone deaf person sing.



Well, at least you have some strategies that may be helpful to you regarding this practice of yours.





I'm sure you're good at something, just not at thinking. Find that thing and do it.

I agree with you.  Most people have some things that they are better at than others.  Some people can learn, and get better, and other people are only going to become so good at any thing that they attempt.  There are also people who lack focus, and never really get too good at anything.

I am pretty good (above average) at a few things. Sometimes I do those things that I am good at, and other times, I attempt to learn new things.

What I am trying to say is that you have a tragic inability to understand the effect you have on people who have the misfortune of your company.  I am not attempting to be substantive because I know that it is futile.  You're too dumb to even know how dumb you are. It's not that you are unconvinced of your lack of intelligence. It's that you are unconvincible. It's like you've turned being a moron into a superpower. It's vexing. In a less civilized society this could perhaps be resolved with blunt force trauma to your cranium, but all we can do is suffer your existence.

You're the real world equivalent of Scrappy Doo.


There you go again using the royal "we."  You seem to think that there is some kind of consensus in your little brain, merely because you think something.  For some reason you are resentful because I publicly (and with good reasons) solicited you to be either banned or suspended from posting due to your apparent trolling, repetition, exaggerations, FUCD spreading, etc, and you have run out of arguments, and you are resorting to baloney personal attacks that have no merit at all...


maybe you have nothing better to do, because chartbuddy has disappeared?

Hopefully, I am not sinking to your low and pathetic level by even entertaining you in your nonsense.  In other words: Go fuck yourself.     Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Consensus only matters if agreement is required. I am not attempting to persuade you. I am informing you that smart people already know that you're not one of us. There is universal consensus among the people who know that you are a moron that you are a moron. It's not obvious to everybody, but it is obvious to smart people. It may even be apparent to some dumb people, but for some inexplicable reason it is not apparent or even detectable to you.

It's not some subjective thing like whether you have good taste in clothing or literature. It's an objective fact  that you are a dullard. a numbskull. a person lacking full mental ability, the knowledge of that handicap, and the ability to ever acquire that knowledge. 

Imagine a baby born blind who grew up refusing to believe that such a thing as sight even existed. That's you, Pal. What can even be done with a person like that?



3724. Post 14206321 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: becoin on March 15, 2016, 01:48:01 PM
Bitcoin is not even attempting to do what ETH does.
Not true. Rootstock is doing it better because it is using the safest blockchain on this planet - the bitcoin blockchain.

The safest? With supermajority mining hardware within the political boundaries of the People's Republic of China?  That's like saying you're swimming in the safest pool except for that one giant shark.



3725. Post 14209215 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: becoin on March 15, 2016, 06:05:46 PM
Bitcoin is not even attempting to do what ETH does.
Not true. Rootstock is doing it better because it is using the safest blockchain on this planet - the bitcoin blockchain.

The safest? With supermajority mining hardware within the political boundaries of the People's Republic of China?  That's like saying you're swimming in the safest pool except for that one giant shark.
China is the nowadays 'factory of the world'. Supermajority of every hardware is produced there. There is no reason why Bitcoin mining hardware should be an exception. It is a good counter balance to the supermajority of bitcoin software developers living within the political boundaries of the United States of America and they all can be arrested by FBI in 5 minutes!

It doesn't matter where it's produced. It matters where it is. It matters that it can be confiscated/nationalized, and then used to execute a series of 51% attacks and force us to fork to a different encryption algorithm that would initially have almost no hashpower.  In a competitive marketplace, it can kill us, and it can happen anytime the PRC wants to do it. The only reason they haven't yet is because we are too small to bother with. As soon as that stops being true, such a fatal attack is almost inevitable.

The bigger BTC's market cap, the bigger target we are. Damn pumpers are gonna pump us out of existence.



3726. Post 14209554 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: BitChick on March 15, 2016, 07:29:06 PM
So whats up with the huge walls on Stamp again the past couple of days?  I see a wall of 1000 coins right now. 

Strangely I take that as a bullish sign.  Someone is trying to keep the price down perhaps?

Walls can be pulled. The order book is a spotty indicator at best. What is more relevant are the coins bought and sold with leverage. These coins have to be, MUST be traded for fiat. On BFX, there is currently almost $26MM in leveraged longs (62,000 BTC)vs. ~10,600 leveraged shorts, or roughly a six to one ratio. That is extremely bearish unless you think that people who don't have enough money to buy BTC without leverage are somehow smarter and better informed than those who do.






3727. Post 14209920 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: 600watt on March 15, 2016, 10:00:51 PM
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/btcc-s-sampson-mow-on-block-size-the-bitcoin-community-must-see-through-manipulation-keep-calm-and-write-code-1458061357



hm... interesting. helped me understanding core a little bit better. or is he telling bullshit?

No, it's not dishonest. It's stupid. He is saying a ship sails better with no captain, just randomly floating with the tides, winds and currents and whatever the sailors feel like doing at any given time.  He dismisses the concerns of the passengers, who don't just want to avoid icebergs and pirates, but actually have specific places to go.

Many of us are now just looking for a good opportunity to get off this floating madhouse.









3728. Post 14209996 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on March 15, 2016, 10:26:23 PM

No, it's not dishonest. It's stupid. He is saying a ship sails better with no captain, just randomly floating with the tides, winds and currents and whatever the sailors feel like doing at any given time.  He dismisses the concerns of the passengers, who don't just want to avoid icebergs and pirates, but actually have specific places to go.

Many of us are now just looking for a good opportunity to get off this floating madhouse.

this how Open Source works? it's new for you? eat it or leave it.

It's not new. I bought in at ~$10 when Gavin was in charge and saw the value of my investment appreciate several thousand percent. Since Wladimir took over, there has been a bump of <100% due almost exclusively to third world ponzi schemers.  Other than that, it's a complete disaster.  

If there is another serious test of $500 resistance, I will indeed get out and I won't ever come back unless there is a change in governance at a minimum.  I'm looking for that safe port to disembark.



3729. Post 14211013 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: 600watt on March 15, 2016, 11:05:42 PM

No, it's not dishonest. It's stupid. He is saying a ship sails better with no captain, just randomly floating with the tides, winds and currents and whatever the sailors feel like doing at any given time.  He dismisses the concerns of the passengers, who don't just want to avoid icebergs and pirates, but actually have specific places to go.

Many of us are now just looking for a good opportunity to get off this floating madhouse.





i had come to the conclusion before that blocksize limit had to be raised fast and frequently. i did not understand for fuck sake, why core didn´t act. then came the blockstream narrative. those guys are on payrolls, they want to make a buck with new layers, crippling the original layer. ok, maybe. (i always thought new possible layers were welcomed and cheered by everyone). this interview made it easier for me to understand why core is so inert, almost academic.

and now you are saying that this is stupid. do i understand you right that the way bitcoin was maintained in the last 3 years was/is stupid, because there is no captain? you want another way of "governing" bitcoin. that is legitimate. as far as i understood it, there is none. do you believe the classic team will write safer code?

(edit)

Classic code gets tested on testnet the same as Core code.  There is no way of knowing how vulnerable ANY code is to hazards that are not uncovered by testing. Of course there are risks, but there are risks to doing nothing also. I am not a programmer or a cryptographer. I am a student of economic theory. It is there where my concerns lay. Bitcoin may or may not have the safest or more accurately least unsafe blockchain, but it does unquestionably have the oldest and longest chain. That's it's value and firstmover advantage. The size of the blockchain is Bitcoin's greatest asset and smallblockers and Core are treating it as a liability.  That indicates they don't even understand the very thing they are trying to safeguard.

We shouldn't care just what the cost to nodes are of a larger chain. We should care about the RELATIVE cost is considering the value of the network they are securing.  Likewise we shouldn't care if miners are getting compensated enough bitcoin to secure the network. We should care if they are given enough value in fiat terms to secure the network.  It's meaningless to argue over fees vs. subsidy without also taking exchange price into account.

Leading libertarians and anarchocapitalists is like herding cats and Core developers are no different. I know it would be difficult for anybody to do, but it must be done or Bitcoin will either die or fade into obscurity. There are few barriers to entry into this market and competitors are coming on fast. I'm not saying Code development needs rulers. It needs leaders that can forge consensus, and Mow is completely wrong when he says we have one. What we have is a roadmap that some are are reluctantly for, some are against, and some say they are for while they secretly are working to undermine it. What's worse is that even if the roadmap gets implemented, it may be too little too late. 

Classic is not looking to permanently replace Core. Classic supporters like me want greater on-chain scalability and we don't much care how we get it. So if Classic motivates Core to act, then it's a success. If it becomes the most commonly used client, then we know that will only be the case for as long as it enjoys sufficient support. Governance that is never threatened is unaccountable.  That's the hard truth that smallblockers can't seem to accept. Accountability and stability are inversely proportional.  It's a trade-off, so pick your poison.



3730. Post 14211389 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 15, 2016, 11:21:17 PM

No, it's not dishonest. It's stupid. He is saying a ship sails better with no captain, just randomly floating with the tides, winds and currents and whatever the sailors feel like doing at any given time.  He dismisses the concerns of the passengers, who don't just want to avoid icebergs and pirates, but actually have specific places to go.

Many of us are now just looking for a good opportunity to get off this floating madhouse.

this how Open Source works? it's new for you? eat it or leave it.

It's not new. I bought in at ~$10 when Gavin was in charge and saw the value of my investment appreciate several thousand percent. Since Wladimir took over, there has been a bump of <100% due almost exclusively to third world ponzi schemers.  Other than that, it's a complete disaster.  

If there is another serious test of $500 resistance, I will indeed get out and I won't ever come back unless there is a change in governance at a minimum.  I'm looking for that safe port to disembark.


keep calm, stay tuned. everything will be fine.


By now, we should all realize some things regarding Bully JoeAllen...  He wants to imagine some better place out there, but when push comes to shove, he cannot identify 1 other place to put his money that is better than bitcoin....

If there is no good place to park money, the option is always available to spend it instead. That option is looking more and more attractive to me every day.





3731. Post 14218428 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: becoin on March 16, 2016, 05:12:13 PM
yeah the blocks being full was starting to become obvious and a problem.. they are full 24/7 now .
Obviously adoption is accelerating. How can this be a problem?

Is it easier to disrupt the road system at 3 a.m. or during rush hour? When we are running so close to capacity, we become more vulnerable to intentional and unintentional service disruptions.



3732. Post 14219189 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: AlexGR on March 16, 2016, 05:55:20 PM
yeah the blocks being full was starting to become obvious and a problem.. they are full 24/7 now .
Obviously adoption is accelerating. How can this be a problem?

Is it easier to disrupt the road system at 3 a.m. or during rush hour? When we are running so close to capacity, we become more vulnerable to intentional and unintentional service disruptions.

In bitcoin, there are as many roads, as are people willing to pay different fees. This makes the system impossible to disrupt, unlike a single-road system.

1st road is for those paying 0 satoshi per byte
2nd road is for those paying 1 satoshi per byte
...
31st road is for those paying 50 satoshi per byte
...
51st road is for those paying 50 satoshi per byte
...
101th road is for those paying 100 satoshi per byte


Some roads (like 1st, second etc) can be congested because, well... free-riders

If you are in a hurry though, you are not forced to use any of the free-rider congested roads. You just use the 20th, 30th, 40th, 50th, 60th road, and go to your destination much faster.

So... where do you want to go, and how fast do you want to go there?

Tolls are practically zero to near-zero cost anyway, even for the higher count roads like the 40th or 50th (~0.04 - 0.05$).

We have a capacity of around half a million transactions per day no matter how high the fees get.  We are closer to that limit than we were before blocks filled up.  Fees do not add capacity and only mitigate the problem without solving it.  With less room to grow, we will grow less. How is that even controversial?


If bitcoin is less useful for marginal use cases, it is less valuable, and it is reasonable to see that reflected in the price. This seems so obvious to me, I don't understand why I even have to say it.



3733. Post 14219378 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

We are down more than 8% in the last three months, even though we're 3 months closer to the halving. We are down 64% from the All Time High 28 months later, even though we are 28 months closer to the halving.


The halving is known. It's priced in.  It's the only reason we aren't trading in the $200s right now.



3734. Post 14219785 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: AlexGR on March 16, 2016, 06:55:49 PM
We have a capacity of around half a million transactions per day no matter how high the fees get.  We are closer to that limit than we were before blocks filled up.  Fees do not add capacity and only mitigate the problem without solving it.  With less room to grow, we will grow less. How is that even controversial?

Your underlying assumption is that spam=legit tx volume=growth.

I do not assume the same thing:

https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions-excluding-chains-longer-than-10
https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions-excluding-chains-longer-than-100

This is the number of txs when you exclude coins that have been sequentially sent over and over again for >10 or >100 times.

This is like saying, I gave you 5$ in paypal, you instantly gave it to someone else, and he instantly gave it to someone else, and this happened over 100 times in a single day (with the same money). Sounds legit Tongue

Well, if you have people that do chains of >10, >100, >1000, by sending coins between their addresses or something, they are occupying the space of >100 or >1000 ordinary txs by doing so. This is only made possible by the extremely low fee structure. If fee competition is introduced in a meaningful way, for one such chain that is eliminated, you get +1000tx capacity for normal uses.

Legacy systems won't really allow that kind of abuse. By the time you've done that a few times with a bank wire or visa or paypal, the 5$ will be gone in fees.

There is no way to prevent that type of abuse without also preventing legitimate marginal use cases. It's an open protocol. A transaction limit is a ham-fisted, draconian anti-spam measure that costs more than it benefits.  You either need to accept that spam is a cost of doing business, or you need to find a better anti-spam tool.

It's only a matter of time before the next spam attack, and that will doubtless trigger another sell-off. If I was an amoral opportunist, I'd do it myself and make a pile of money. Regardless, it's likely somebody will do it and smallblockers are giving that spammer the tool to use.



3735. Post 14220075 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

A spam attack could cost ~$5,000 and impose $3-4,000 in additional harddrive space and bandwidth costs PER GB to the nodes. It's a stupid attack UNLESS you can drive the price down $20 or more by causing a service disruption and then the attack can more than pay for itself.

That has already been done. I don't know if the spammer traded the sell-off he caused or not, but now he knows he can and so does everybody else.  I know of no way of preventing this except increasing transaction capacity. 

We are sitting ducks.



3736. Post 14220369 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: becoin on March 16, 2016, 08:05:38 PM
yeah the blocks being full was starting to become obvious and a problem.. they are full 24/7 now .
Obviously adoption is accelerating. How can this be a problem?

Is it easier to disrupt the road system at 3 a.m. or during rush hour? When we are running so close to capacity, we become more vulnerable to intentional and unintentional service disruptions.
Sure, you can say that these are not attacks and we should allow everyone to use Bitcoin as they see fit, but let's try a simpler example. If someone loots all the toilet paper from the public toilet, is that a bad thing? Is the solution to double the amount of toilet paper stocked each day?

Yeah, I read the Mow interview.  I know there are attacks. Some of the transactions are spam and some aren't. To use your (Mow's) analogy, the answer depends on if you see more benefit to the double toiletpaper costs than drawbacks.  Toilet paper and hard drive space is cheap.  How many customers are you willing to drive away to prevent free-riding parasitism? 

I'm not opposed to anti-spam measures, just this particular measure because it's too costly.  You want to cure a headache will a guillotine. It may work, but at what cost? 



3737. Post 14220513 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 16, 2016, 08:33:20 PM
A spam attack .... It's a stupid attack UNLESS ..... the attack ....

..... the spammer ...... increasing transaction capacity.  

We are sitting ducks.

Just leave already.

Why don't you just charge a fee to post so us "spammers" will leave, Numbnuts?



3738. Post 14262903 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

This last week has seen a lower high and a lower low than the previous week.  I think the smart money is looking to unload at ~$420 on Wednesday unless there is some change in the fundamentals that justifies hodling.

We still have limited room to increase transactions, governance issues and a mining concentration security problem.  I don't expect a substantial pump until and unless there is a successful SegWit roll-out.

There is a strong correlation between full blocks and a dropping price.  This makes us vulnerable to price manipulation to the downside. 



3739. Post 14263760 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: DaRude on March 20, 2016, 09:03:50 PM
The halving is priced in or we will see a huge pump? How many percent are your bets?

My bet is nothing much happens. There's a whole lot of noise taking up attention elsewhere.

I'll be VERY surprised if we'll have this stable market all the way up to the halving in supply. I mean how accurate do you think they price these things in?

Based on your sig, If Bitcoin is not allowed to grow, won't price decline? I mean it seems impossible to have price appreciation without growth. There is no way to stop growth that won't also stop appreciation.



3740. Post 14264345 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: DaRude on March 20, 2016, 10:34:35 PM
The halving is priced in or we will see a huge pump? How many percent are your bets?

My bet is nothing much happens. There's a whole lot of noise taking up attention elsewhere.

I'll be VERY surprised if we'll have this stable market all the way up to the halving in supply. I mean how accurate do you think they price these things in?

Based on your sig, If Bitcoin is not allowed to grow, won't price decline? I mean it seems impossible to have price appreciation without growth. There is no way to stop growth that won't also stop appreciation.

Quote
"And it leads to an obvious but crazy conclusion: if decentralisation is what makes Bitcoin good, and growth threatens decentralisation, then Bitcoin should not be allowed to grow." -Mike Hearn
Yes, yes, and again yes. Until better solution is found, growth should not be achieved simply at the cost of centralization!

Quote is from Hearn's rage quit. By growth he's talking about giving free access to something that is limited in supply by design. Think it's obvious that it won't work. Make a block 80MB and if it's free (or almost free) to fill up someone will. Utilization can continue to grow even if it costs few cents extra for a space in a block.

I know damn well where it's from, but you didn't answer my question.  Utilization can only grow until it hits the limit, at which point it can't continue to grow.  In the process, of course I understand that low value transactions will be replaced by relatively higher value transactions that merit higher fees, but there is still a limit and because of the correlation between price and utilization, there is a limit on price. We can debate what that limit is, but it's there.  There is a price beyond which a network congestion failure is an inevitable certainty if capacity is constant.  This should be so obvious, it bewilders me that I even have to say it. What is the cognitive disconnect of smallblockers who think capacity limits aren't also price limits? 

Look, if price keeps going up, it's going to attract new users, traders, speculators etc. This is obvious. There is no way to stop it. The growth will continue to come until something prevents them from participating, like a physical inability to get their transactions processed. What else could stop them? The ONLY thing that I think would do it is if the price stopped rising. Do you have another idea?

So either we will eventually get a network congestion failure or a complete halt in price appreciation without additional capacity.  This is not an opinion. This is a logical certainty. 



3741. Post 14266377 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 20, 2016, 11:04:35 PM
Quote
So either we will eventually get a network congestion failure or a complete halt in price appreciation without additional capacity.  This is not an opinion. This is a logical certainty.  

... this idiotic statement refuses to acknowledge that there are already a great number of bitcoin transactions that do not take place on the bitcoin network, and they can also lead to price appreciation from an increased network effect.

Your argument is simplistically idiotic because it is the equivalent of saying that if you cannot use FedWire then USdollar usage cannot increase.
 
ok, Moron. Let me use an extreme example to illustrate my point (as you seem to be too stupid to grasp what most high school kids could understand).  Imagine bitcoin trades at $1,000,000/BTC next month for some reason. Would not millions, tens of millions of people want to jump in on that?  How are millions going to do it with a capacity of a half million xaction/day? They would try. You know how crazy people get in a mania.

Dollars existed before FedWire. Bitcoin derivatives did not exist before Bitcoin. Of course it's theoretically possible for Bitcoin value to increase without transaction volume increasing, but that's not how the real world works.  You are trying to make reality fit your model in stead of the other way around.



3742. Post 14270732 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: hdbuck on March 21, 2016, 07:13:02 AM
Imagine bitcoin trades at $1,000,000/BTC next month for some reason. Would not millions, tens of millions of people want to jump in on that?  How are millions going to do it with a capacity of a half million xaction/day? They would try. You know how crazy people get in a mania.

Tens of millions, assuming just 1 x "tens" (=10 million), is ~40 times than the current 250k txs/day.

Allowing for 90% fullness, and not all blocks at 100% (if some miners opt to mine less), you'd need ~44.5 mb blocks.

For two tens (=20 million), you need ~89mb blocks.

For some reason people fail to see that. And think raising a block to 4mb will solve all the problems

It's never been about the blocksize.

Forking just to make sure they can dictacte whatever they feel like whining for, because democracy, because mass adoption blablabluh.

Still it ain't happening, bitcoin does not work that way.

Been over a year so by now the shit blocking their sight might dissolve a bit and hopefully they will soon move on.

Right, Dipshit. That's right. Because if we get 2MB and the price jumps up double or more, it will be that much easier to convince the miners to double it again. and again. Because raising the blocksize will increase the value of our bitcoins.  Why you can't see that is bewildering. Baffling. There is something wrong with you.



3743. Post 14271090 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: hdbuck on March 21, 2016, 02:10:18 PM
^ frustrated little usefull useless idiot

What ya still doing here? Move along already with your retarded buddies over that motherforkers forum..


Maybe if a fee was imposed for posting, I would leave, right? Can't have all this spam clogging up the forum...



3744. Post 14271576 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: hdbuck on March 21, 2016, 03:07:55 PM
^ frustrated little usefull useless idiot

What ya still doing here? Move along already with your retarded buddies over that motherforkers forum..


Maybe if a fee was imposed for posting, I would leave, right? Can't have all this spam clogging up the forum...

aww poor boy

hopefully there is always that lampchop govy shill luv to cheer you up Smiley

I'm wondering what event or series of events happened to you to make you this broken, this dysfunctional of a human being. You're one of those chemtrails fluoride anti-vaccine anti-GMO whackjobs, apparently. You NEED the evil conspiracies to explain why it's not your fault that you're such a complete loser.



3745. Post 14273040 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on March 21, 2016, 04:14:19 PM
You're one of those chemtrails fluoride anti-vaccine anti-GMO whackjobs, apparently. You NEED the evil conspiracies to explain why it's not your fault that you're such a complete loser.

Oh, here's another conspiracy denier / dancing israeli shill.  Interesting correlation with the bigblocktardness.

Never ascribe to conspiracy that which can adequately be explained by incompetence.



3746. Post 14313275 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

A lower high this week in all major markets except BTC-e (just barely). Now we wait to see if we also have a lower low this weekend.  I would think that it wouldn't only be safe to sell now, but a damn good opportunity. Of course I already sold all I am prepared to sell, so if enough people are like me, we'll go up instead.  

I just saw the movie The Big Short. It captured very well the agony of waiting for an upside down market position to pay off. Markets can stay irrrational longer than you can often stay solvent. I remain very bearish on the long-term viability of Bitcoin due to problems with governance, scaling and mining concentration. That, however, mean little with regards to short and medium term market direction.



3747. Post 14316335 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on March 25, 2016, 07:02:46 PM
so much for quiting bitcointalk.org
i just love the controversy too much!

I didn't believe you'd really leave. You can't really trust that other forum anyway. It's run by cypherdoc.

Not even that, but literally everything there is anti-core, anti-blockstream.

Gets annoying/repetitive after a while.

To me, the Frap.doc forum's knee-jerk anti-CoreStream grumbling only becomes more hilarious as time goes on.

It leads them to ridiculous positions like being anti-CLTV, anti-RBF, and anti-SEGWIT.

Now they want to stop segwit from bumping the tps, after spending the last year moaning about how "we neeeed a tps bump RIGHT FUCKING MEOW, or Bitcoin will surely die alone and unloved like an old cat lady."   Cheesy

And then there's the endless process of failed vanity fork bikeshedding, from XT to Unlimited and now to Satoshi's Altcoin.

That deranged ant farm never gets old.  They're always agitated and scurrying around looking for something to bite or sting.   Cheesy

The frequent pouty meltdowns and whiny rage-quits are priceless.  It's very entertaining when they finally realize they have no power over Bitcoin, and can do nothing to change that fact no matter how much noise they make.

The Gavinistas are so self-righteous and determined, yet so ineffective.  That makes for a perfect comedy of errors!   Smiley

They could simply do an honest self-assessment, admit failing because they don't understand how Bitcoin works, and come back.

But that would entail admissions of error on their part and of correctness regarding Core/Blockstream/Theymos, so it won't happen, and we get to enjoy sweet LOLcow products until the last one suffers their inevitable Hearnia.

Look at the volume, Assclown. Nobody give's a shit anymore.  You and your smallblocker buddies have driven the buyers away.



3748. Post 14317500 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: becoin on March 25, 2016, 10:58:22 PM
All the in fighting and trolling is getting a bit too much lately. The way things are currently it looks like we don't all want the same thing which is bitcoin's price to rise right.

I hope to see some kind of consensus soon.
There will never be consensus. There will always be fighting and trolling. You'd better get used to it because this is the future of bitcoin. There will always be some minority like current big blocktards that want to take over bitcoin and ruin or cripple it. Bitcoin's price will rise despite all this!

Rise based on what exactly? a permanent conflict between users, miners and coders? a 100% chance of a network congestion failure before we get to the point we were at 27 months ago? the ability of the PRC to nationalize Chinese mines and execute as many 51% attacks as they want? SegWit TestNet results? What the hell makes you think it's going up and who is supposed to be doing the buying?







3749. Post 14318776 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: chesthing on March 26, 2016, 12:01:24 AM
All the in fighting and trolling is getting a bit too much lately. The way things are currently it looks like we don't all want the same thing which is bitcoin's price to rise right.

I hope to see some kind of consensus soon.
There will never be consensus. There will always be fighting and trolling. You'd better get used to it because this is the future of bitcoin. There will always be some minority like current big blocktards that want to take over bitcoin and ruin or cripple it. Bitcoin's price will rise despite all this!

Rise based on what exactly? a permanent conflict between users, miners and coders? a 100% chance of a network congestion failure before we get to the point we were at 27 months ago? the ability of the PRC to nationalize Chinese mines and execute as many 51% attacks as they want? SegWit TestNet results? What the hell makes you think it's going up and who is supposed to be doing the buying?


Pump it, and they will come.



You can pump anything and get momentum riders, but you have to keep it up indefinitely because as soon as the momentum is lost, they ride it the other way.  Sustainable appreciation has to be based on fundamentals.  

15 out of the last 20 days were green candles, but the price has only recovered about 2/3 of what it lost in the five days prior to that. That's an enormous amount of pumping, but everybody knows that some spammer can crash the market again by filling blocks any time he wants.  



3750. Post 14319343 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: DaRude on March 26, 2016, 05:05:45 AM
All the in fighting and trolling is getting a bit too much lately. The way things are currently it looks like we don't all want the same thing which is bitcoin's price to rise right.

I hope to see some kind of consensus soon.
There will never be consensus. There will always be fighting and trolling. You'd better get used to it because this is the future of bitcoin. There will always be some minority like current big blocktards that want to take over bitcoin and ruin or cripple it. Bitcoin's price will rise despite all this!

Rise based on what exactly? a permanent conflict between users, miners and coders? a 100% chance of a network congestion failure before we get to the point we were at 27 months ago? the ability of the PRC to nationalize Chinese mines and execute as many 51% attacks as they want? SegWit TestNet results? What the hell makes you think it's going up and who is supposed to be doing the buying?


Pump it, and they will come.



You can pump anything and get momentum riders, but you have to keep it up indefinitely because as soon as the momentum is lost, they ride it the other way.  Sustainable appreciation has to be based on fundamentals.  

15 out of the last 20 days were green candles, but the price has only recovered about 2/3 of what it lost in the five days prior to that. That's an enormous amount of pumping, but everybody knows that some spammer can crash the market again by filling blocks any time he wants.  


Are you saying that bitcoin is dead??

i'm saying it's a hobby network and it looks like it will stay a hobby network.  serious adoption would kill it.



3751. Post 14324095 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: AlexGR on March 26, 2016, 10:56:17 AM
i'm saying it's a hobby network and it looks like it will stay a hobby network.  serious adoption would kill it.

Let's see the capabilities of the "hobby network" right now:

300.000 tx/day x 1000$ per tx on average =109.5 billion USD per year, exceeding western union customer department and around half of paypal.

At 300k tx/day and 10.000$ per tx = 1.09 TRILLION usd per year, surpassing paypal and western union combined x3.


At around 3.3mb effective capacity:

1mn txs per day x1000$ per tx on average = 365bn USD per year, exceeding paypal and western union combined.

1mn txs per day x10.000$ per tx on average = 3.65 trillion USD per year

"Hobby coin"  Cry Cry Cry

Sorry, but 99.99% of all these so called "txs" are worthless spam. Cry

It's just a theoretic example of how scaling in USD-volume can occur even with limited tps capabilities. It's what been objected to as a future of a high value settlement network that will not be affordable for the small guy.

So on one hand you have criticism that bitcoin is a useless "hobby coin" and then you have criticism that it's been intended to be a high value settlement network. Obviously these two criticisms are so contradictory that it's not even funny. Yet they come from the same camp.

Because normal people in the real world will not send a million dollar transaction over a network that is useless for $10 transactions.  You have to earn their trust a little at a time.  You are not entitled to it, which I am betting you will have to find out the hard way.  You don't attract big players by pushing out the small players. You don't do that. The big players do that. You just create a predictable environment for the game to be played. Has Core done that? Has Blockstream?

You can't create a world class system from scratch. You have to grow it. Field of Dreams was a movie, not a viable business model.  Look at the Ghosts Cities in China.  That's what you've built. A ghost network. Of course I hope you're right and I'm wrong, because I have my life savings I need to unload on some smallblocker suckers when the price gets high enough, but based on falling volume and lower peaks, I doubt I'm wrong. 



3752. Post 14324878 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: r0ach on March 26, 2016, 05:20:26 PM
For the 500th time, 4mb blocks are already coming.  There is nothing left to discuss about block size for the foreseeable future.

We don't know that. When and if it happens, maybe I'll buy.  4MB is still not in Core's RoadMap.  There may be problems with the SegWit roll-out. Right now, a spam attack could cause the price to drop and cost the attacker less than they can profit by shorting. 

You trade what's gonna happen and I'll trade what has happened. I'll pay you off if I'm right and help mitigate your losses if you are wrong by covering my short. You should be grateful I'm here. I'm your fucking safety net, now run and play.



3753. Post 14327757 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 26, 2016, 11:41:20 PM
they say:  "Let's cause bitcoin prices to fall in order that core compromises with us."  

Link please?

Yeah... that's what I thought.
This paraphrased theme of "Let's cause bitcoin prices to fall in order that core compromises with us"   is so pervasive and common amongst a large number of XT/Classic supporters (anti-core folks) that a link is not necessary.  

Are you really saying that you do not believe my representation?  

That is exactly what I am saying. I do not believe your representation. I have seen exactly zero instances of people trying to tank the price of Bitcoin as a strategy to get Core to capitulate.

So yes, a link is indeed necessary.

Otherwise, you are just pulling shit out of your ass.

I have said many times that we need to tank the price to motivate the miners to abandon core and adopt a sane alternative, but I am a voice crying in the wilderness and not a single person has supported me on this, so we gimp along.



3754. Post 14328454 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 27, 2016, 02:16:26 AM
idk guys... tanking the price might just play into blockstreams hands. maybe they have a massive short position?

short bitcoin
limit block space
code LN
watch as the Tragedy of the commons plays out.
profit!

No, I think it's simpler than that. They sold investors the idea that they have a solution to a problem.  It's not a problem they created. It's just a problem for which they have no incentive to find a better solution. A problem where they have the incentive to find issues with any other proposed solution.

They will find problems with SegWit because they have an incentive to find problems with SegWit. They are smart and they are looking, so they'll find something. It'll be a real issue and it will allow them to delay a little longer. Not too long, or miners will bolt to classic.  I think they can stall quite a while. Miners are stupid. They add hashpower in a place where it produces negative security returns.

The Chinese haven't quite got the hang of capitalism yet. They think we'll buy all the crap they make. If we can't afford it, they'll lend us the money to buy their crap.  This is how they got Ghost Cities, overdeveloped mining, their whole neomercantilist economy.  It will end in tears, just like it ended in Japan and is ending in Korea.



3755. Post 14332261 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on March 27, 2016, 05:43:59 AM
Gentleman, start your engines. It's time to go up into the clouds and beyond.

Lift off is coming this week, short or long it. could be an epic cry week if you choose wrong.

Margin shorts are down, margin longs are up, price has only creeped up to where it was a day ago. Just because we didn't have a Saturday night dump doesn't mean it's time to post rockets. On this volume?

How many times are we gonna get fooled the same way?




3756. Post 14335019 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

So the altcoin pump-and-dumpers are pumping BTC. Hmmmm. What do the P & D crowd do after they pump? They dump.  Shrots are rekt so there is no safety net.

Now there are over 25 Million in longs on BFX to get squeezed instead of 20MM.  But whatever. Keep pumping.  I'm sure that it's fer sure totally sustainable.




3757. Post 14358464 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 29, 2016, 11:32:53 PM
bitcoiners are on the verge of a melt down, all thanks to the blocklimit debate, which seems to have no end in sight.
market will weigh in once its all said and done
assuming core gets their way....when we can play with LN we will either love it or hate it, and boom or bust follows.
until then its probably in everyone's best interest to PUMP dat price. ( if we can  Tongue )



Miners are afraid the market will crash if they try to switch to big block code. The only way to take away that fear is to crash the market. Then they won't fear it anymore. we won't get big blocks without a crash. We won't get a new ATH until we get big blocks. The only way up is to go down first.



3758. Post 14358654 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: BitUsher on March 30, 2016, 12:41:01 AM
Miners are afraid the market will crash if they try to switch to big block code. The only way to take away that fear is to crash the market. Then they won't fear it anymore. we won't get big blocks without a crash. We won't get a new ATH until we get big blocks. The only way up is to go down first.

Please sell everything you have for the thousands time already. You are like a battered house wife that keeps threatening to leave , but comes crawling back again over and over again. Your threats are empty and don't instill any fear in us, and for good reason.

The small amount of classic supporters and most payment processors/banks are desperate for immediate returns from the hope that simply raising bitcoins tx capacity will cause new users to flock to bitcoin in droves regardless of the two not necessarily being correlated. Most people didn't hear the other side to Garzik's "Fidelity problem" and what Fidelity had in store for bitcoin.

While the rest of us on the other hand do indeed care about price and mass adoption we put those priorities as secondary to decentralization/fungibility/security/robustness. We are more interested in the technology and its implications rather than just getting wealthy in the short term.

This is why your threats to crash the price don't scare us. We will simply buy into the price and get cheaper coins, as we don't need to turn a profit today and are looking at the longterm health of bitcoin. If we are betrayed by the miners than so be it , we will sell classiccoin and invest in the new coin even if we are forced to change the consensus algo for security. Classic's roadmap is indeed not aligned with our values and we will not be threatened or coerced into any conciliation.

That's the first I've heard of a fidelity problem. What is it? I am also concerned with decentralization, specifically the centralization of mining in the People's Republic of China and the centralization of code development with the reference client. Now these two special interest groups (core and miners) are openly colluding against their customers.  How is THAT in line with your values?

I am not predicting a crash. I am not threatening a crash. I am simply saying that it is extremely unlikely that we will get a new ATH WITHOUT a crash.  What is likely is muddling through, bouncing around in this range until some event or series of events pushes us out of it one way or the other.



3759. Post 14358823 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: BitUsher on March 30, 2016, 01:12:25 AM
That's the first I've heard of a fidelity problem. What is it?

It was ambiguously discussed in one of Garzik's conference speeches, which became a major selling point of why bitcoin needs to increase the blocksize immediately by suggesting that Fidelity investments is interested in using Bitcoin but cannot because the capacity is too low. What Garzik did not clarify was what they intended to use bitcoin for and how they would use the blockchain which is a crucial bit of data that is critical in context.

Fidelity wanted to make payments of zero bitcoins to track non-bitcoin related assets by storing their data in the Bitcoin network and bypass all network fees by partnering up directly with several large mining pools and paying them directly in fiat a much smaller sum. In other words , they wanted for our ecosystem to heavily subsidize their spam. Perfect example of Tragedy of the commons.

I would actually say it's a perfect example of a use case. Bitcoins are database-writing tokens. That's what they are. Why do you object to them being used to write data to a database?  You object to facts? Hatefacts? You think it's even possible to control what kind of data gets written to the database, when that database was specifically designed to be censorship-resistant?   That's a special kind of hubris. King Canute ain't got nothin' on you.


Quote
I am also concerned with decentralization, specifically the centralization of mining in the People's Republic of China and the centralization of code development with the reference client. Now these two special interest groups core and miners) are openly colluding against their customers.  How is THAT in line with your values?

You are living in a dream world if you believe a majority of users support classic. I understand it is difficult to approximate a uservote with all the sybil attacking/cloud node promotion going on within the classic camp but there are other ways to estimate support . One way is to compare forum volume and reddit volume for active users . Even with a large and heavy campaign to attack theymos for censorship/moderation r/bitcoin still has between 2.5-3.5x the amount of live users in their subreddit  than r/btc. If classic had the support you suggest it should be trivial for you to buy enough hashing power to mine more than 4-7% of blocks.

In fact , rather than sell all your coins , if you are so intrested in Bitcoin  and its health and decentralization why don't you invest in a bunch of ASICs so you can mine Classic?

I already explained why I don't mine. 1) too difficult to compete with sibsidized electricity and cheap labor in China. 2)Mining rigs are expensive, rapidly depreciating capital goods with low liquidity relative to just buying bitcoins. 3)economies of scale mean that I would basically have to do it full time to be competitive and I have other stuff to do.



3760. Post 14359090 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: BitUsher on March 30, 2016, 01:40:23 AM
You are living in a dream world if you believe a majority of users doesn't support 2MB blocks. And not only "majority" i would also say "supermajority".

Which is why I support segwit and core's roadmap. So typical for a classic supporter to spread misleading information by insinuating I wasn't in favor of larger blocks.

I would actually say it's a perfect example of a use case. Bitcoins are database-writing tokens. That's what they are. Why do you object to them being used to write data to a database?  You object to facts? Hatefacts? You think it's even possible to control what kind of data gets written to the database, when that database was specifically designed to be censorship-resistant?   That's a special kind of hubris. King Canute ain't got nothin' on you.

You are helpless if you cannot see the problem with Fidelity externalizing the costs. Some of these costs are permanent as well. They would be  bypassing all tx fees and having bitcoin users carry the burden of supporting the network through inflation , Demurrage, and higher tx fees where they paid much lower tx fees and incurred none of the other costs.  Fidelity wasn't interested in paying the normal network tx fee, they weren't going to be purchasing any bitcoins, and the only person they may have slightly benefited would be 1-2 large mining pools with a backend deal.


In other words , no new Bitcoin users would come on board through their action, our fees would increase from 7-10 usd to something higher with higher node drop off and more centralization, and they would pay fractions of a penny per tx in fiat directly to miners bypassing the normal fee market.

You can't control what kind of data gets written to a censorship-resistant database. That would be censorship.  Why can't you damn cripplecoiners get that through your heads? Who isn't being true to our values here?

You object to Fidelity getting fee discounts but not SegWit users getting discounts? You gripe about externalizing costs while you helped cause the value of my investment to lose 60% in the last 27 months. Kinda rich coming from you.

You can't have it both ways.  Censorship-resistance means people are going to do stuff with their freedom that you don't like. We tolerate that because it mean we can do what they don't like. That's freedom, if you can't handle it, Bitcoin maybe isn't for you.

Classic helps mitigate the selfish mining advantage the Chinese get behind the Great Firewall.  Faster block propagation means less of a mining Cartel for Fidelity et. al. with which to collude.



3761. Post 14359251 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: BitUsher on March 30, 2016, 02:30:25 AM
You can't control what kind of data gets written to a censorship-resistant database. That would be censorship.  Why can't you damn cripplecoiners get that through your heads? Who isn't being true to our values here?

You object to Fidelity getting fee discounts but not SegWit users getting discounts? You gripe about externalizing costs while you helped cause the value of my investment to lose 60% in the last 27 months. Kinda rich coming from you.

You can't have it both ways.  Censorship-resistance means people are going to do stuff with their freedom that you don't like. We tolerate that because it mean we can do what they don't like. That's freedom, if you can't handle it, Bitcoin maybe isn't for you.

Classic helps mitigate the selfish mining advantage the Chinese get behind the Great Firewall.  Faster block propagation means less of a mining Cartel for Fidelity et. al. with which to collude.

Ahh , you are reading into my statements and making some assumptions that I am not suggesting. I never said we should censor tx or data on the blockchain.

 I am only suggesting a protocol that allowed for the externalized costs to be considered and a level playing field where tx fees , inflation , and demurrage were equally shouldered by Fidelity or anyone else.

So go ahead and upload your virus signature, penis pictures, and spam to the network. I am perfectly fine if you wish to spend 7-10 dollars to do so per tx.

All you do by limiting transaction capacity is limit transaction capacity.  You have no way of knowing if you've restricted cost-externalizing xactions more than legit xactions.  It's possible that a higher percentage of xactions will be cost-externalizing on a near capacity network, because those are the only transactions that may make economic sense in a high fee environment. I'm not saying I know. I'm saying I don't know. can't know. and neither can you.



3762. Post 14377098 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: aztecminer on March 30, 2016, 03:57:28 PM
Segwit soon + 2mb fork being scheduled by core = around 4mb blocks during 2017, there's nothing to discuss about block size unless you demand 8mb now.


until it happens, it still didnt happen.. all this was already supposed to have happened, yet it never did happen.. and now your saying its going to happen supposedly soon.. just like before.. deja vu .. how about getting the work done first... and then we will stop discussing it.

exactly. It's like buying chickens from someone who only has eggs. The likelihood of eggs becoming chickens is less than a certainty, and the risk needs to be factored in.

In the mean time, spam attacks now reliably cause the price to drop ~$20 and price doesn't seem to fully recover when they are over. Buying now seems to offer more risk than reward and waiting appears to be prudent. 

I would rather buy at $600 with a 90% chance of a 10% profit than buy at $300 with a 40% chance of doubling my money. There will be plenty of time to profit if a scaling solution actually plays out,  but it hasn't played out yet and there is a real possibility that it won't. People who have a financial interest in preventing/delaying SegWit know how to do it because the smallblockers have shown them how to do it. A vocal minority can inject enough FUD by spewing technobabble to prevent a near unanimous consensus.  That's all it takes to kill an upgrade under Wladimir. 




3763. Post 14395819 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Tzupy on April 01, 2016, 11:22:07 AM

Crazy prediction:

Craig Wright IS Satoshi Nakamoto and is going to destroy the Millions of coins he holds to proof it.

Would you mind specifying how will he DESTROY coins?

Easy. You just send them to an address where the private keys are known to be lost.



3764. Post 14395962 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: stereotype on April 02, 2016, 06:52:06 AM
Is that light, i see?..... https://petertodd.org/2016/btcc-funding

Quote
there’s a much more fundamental problem: we’re not doing a good job of communicating why we’re concerned about decentralization, and why we think larger blocks are a risk.

I get so fucking tired of this. it's not that we don't understand your concerns. It's that we don't AGREE with your concerns.  There is a communication problem but it's not that you don't explain yourself well enough. The problem is you don't fucking listen.

You can't gripe that you're under the gun with the SegWit roll-out after stalling for YEARS claiming that we had plenty of time to fix this problem and there's no hurry. You only care now because miners are threatening to revolt and everybody knows it.   

You wasted your trust capital and now it's gone. You have nobody to blame but yourself.



3765. Post 14396139 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on April 02, 2016, 07:23:49 AM

Canada doesn't have a monopoly on smart people but on a basis of population we're still well ahead of the Russians

Only because you import Chinese and export Celene Dion and Nickleback.



3766. Post 14396336 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on April 02, 2016, 07:58:50 AM

Canada doesn't have a monopoly on smart people but on a basis of population we're still well ahead of the Russians

Only because you import Chinese and export Celene Dion and Nickleback.

We also don't put our healthcare in the hands of sleazy insurance corporations or spend more on the military than on education.

I tried not to mention the Land of the Incarcerated and the Home of the Emboldened. Sigh.
_________ 

Sorry everybody. I should never have bitten Bargainchop's trollbait. My apologies.

What does that have to do with intelligence? You benefit from America's military protection and R&D from drug companies while we pay for it. I don't agree with our government policies either, but it doesn't make you smarter. It makes you parasites. If the shit hits the fan, I'm going to Canada too because you disarmed motherfuckers will be easy pickings.



3767. Post 14396883 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on April 02, 2016, 08:55:31 AM
You benefit from America's military protection and R&D from drug companies while we pay for it. I don't agree with our government policies either, but it doesn't make you smarter. It makes you parasites. If the shit hits the fan, I'm going to Canada too because you disarmed motherfuckers will be easy pickings.

Even Dick Cheney isn't dumb enough to fuck with the USA's number one trading partner. As for "easy pickings" remember who won the War of 1812 (hint: it wasn't the USA).

Canada never started a war and we never lost one either. In fact we were the first across the lines in WW1, made a huge sacrifice in WW2 at the test of Hitler's defenses at Dieppe and again spearheaded the invasion at Normandy on D-day. Ask any Netherlander who really cleared the Axis powers out of Europe.
____

I really didn't want to get into a little nationalistic sandbox dispute with a member of our number one trading partner, but you started it. First blood.

Anyway, I'm done with this nonsense. Goodnight.

I don't give a shit about Dick Cheney. We are talking about a shit-hits-the-fan scenario where people without guns become the bitches for people with guns. It's not about nations. it's about people who beat their swords into plowshares being forced to plow for those who didn't. I'm not a nationalist. I'm a marksman. You're a target. an arrogant fat soft unarmed socialist target.

I'm a free trader, but NAFTA isn't free trade. It's managed trade. It's a screw job for both countries. I don't care if you bootleg movies or music. Copying isn't stealing. But it pisses me off that Canadians get American drugs cheaper than we get them ourselves while we subsidize your national defense. My government sucks. So does yours. Just be a good neighbor and stop bragging about how smart you are for stealing from us because we have more guns than you and we're getting pretty fed up.  



3768. Post 14405091 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 02, 2016, 09:49:03 PM
Hi hi, you primitive nationalist you. I forget sometimes that some groups of eukaryotes are so stupid that they believe in lines on maps.. We live on the same fucking planet, and have evolved from the same cells. Talking about who's "best" is stupid.

In the same amount of time it took to change wolves to dogs, some groups of humans have been isolated from each other that long.  There are obvious differences in groups and it would be illogical if there wasn't.

Dogs are exceptionally diverse. Partly because they've been bred by humans, partly because of their unique genetic characteristics. Cats have pretty much looked the same for 40 million years. But even there we find more diversity than between humans. Although they look similar, a normal house cat is 4kg, a siberian tiger is 423kg. The global average of 72.7kg for humans is a figure everyone on the planet can relate to, regardless of geographic location or ethnicity. The reason for this is in large part due to the amount of energy the human brain consumes.

This big brain has made it possible for us humans to adapt our environment to us rather than we adapting to our environment. So humans are pretty much the same as they were when part of the human species moved out of Africa. One of the things we struggled to adapt to us was the sun. Dark skin requires a lot of sunlight to produce vitamin D. Humans in colder environments would have an evolutionary bias towards lighter skin. At the same time the large asian deserts made it difficult for people with large round eyes, so an evolutionary bias towards more narrow eye shapes developed in parts of Asia.

So yes, there are differences. But none that are significant in relation to your social darwinistic delusion.

I don't get it. You just provided more evidence for your opponent's position. It doesn't matter if there are more differences with dogs than humans. What matters is that there are differences, and these differences aren't just in appearances, but also in behavioral traits and intelligence, because differing traits are advantageous in differing environments. 

What is more interesting to me is that humans everywhere have evolved instincts and behaviors that were useful in their original environments but very maladaptive now in modern times. The most obvious being that we stay hungry far after we have consumed sufficient calories. Some of these maladptive behaviors are sex-specific, such as men's preferences for women with visual fertility cues or women's preference for high status men to the exclusion of far more logically relevant qualities.

We have changed our environment in many ways, some of which are better and some of which are incompatible with our natural behaviors.  Cubical farms and assembly lines are miserable places to work. Mating practices and rituals are elaborate, inefficient, and often produce worse results than random pairings or arranged marriages.  What remains to be seen is whether we can continue to improve our environment or whether we will develop traits more compatible to it. 



3769. Post 14407259 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 03, 2016, 06:53:43 AM
Hi hi, you primitive nationalist you. I forget sometimes that some groups of eukaryotes are so stupid that they believe in lines on maps.. We live on the same fucking planet, and have evolved from the same cells. Talking about who's "best" is stupid.

In the same amount of time it took to change wolves to dogs, some groups of humans have been isolated from each other that long.  There are obvious differences in groups and it would be illogical if there wasn't.

Dogs are exceptionally diverse. Partly because they've been bred by humans, partly because of their unique genetic characteristics. Cats have pretty much looked the same for 40 million years. But even there we find more diversity than between humans. Although they look similar, a normal house cat is 4kg, a siberian tiger is 423kg. The global average of 72.7kg for humans is a figure everyone on the planet can relate to, regardless of geographic location or ethnicity. The reason for this is in large part due to the amount of energy the human brain consumes.

This big brain has made it possible for us humans to adapt our environment to us rather than we adapting to our environment. So humans are pretty much the same as they were when part of the human species moved out of Africa. One of the things we struggled to adapt to us was the sun. Dark skin requires a lot of sunlight to produce vitamin D. Humans in colder environments would have an evolutionary bias towards lighter skin. At the same time the large asian deserts made it difficult for people with large round eyes, so an evolutionary bias towards more narrow eye shapes developed in parts of Asia.

So yes, there are differences. But none that are significant in relation to your social darwinistic delusion.

I don't get it. You just provided more evidence for your opponent's position. It doesn't matter if there are more differences with dogs than humans. What matters is that there are differences, and these differences aren't just in appearances, but also in behavioral traits and intelligence, because differing traits are advantageous in differing environments.  

What is more interesting to me is that humans everywhere have evolved instincts and behaviors that were useful in their original environments but very maladaptive now in modern times. The most obvious being that we stay hungry far after we have consumed sufficient calories. Some of these maladptive behaviors are sex-specific, such as men's preferences for women with visual fertility cues or women's preference for high status men to the exclusion of far more logically relevant qualities.

We have changed our environment in many ways, some of which are better and some of which are incompatible with our natural behaviors.  Cubical farms and assembly lines are miserable places to work. Mating practices and rituals are elaborate, inefficient, and often produce worse results than random pairings or arranged marriages.  What remains to be seen is whether we can continue to improve our environment or whether we will develop traits more compatible to it.  

You've misunderstood

Robert Metcalfe's net worth is 250 million. What's yours?

You've misunderstood

No, I think I understand very well. You are saying that natural selection is cruel enough without us making it more so. I agree with that, but I also know that there are limits to how much we can ameliorate evolutionary pressures without introducing even worse cruelties. We don't have the luxury of merely virtue signalling how much we care about the unlucky and the ungifted.  Responsible advocacy has to consider costs, benefits, and unintended consequences.



3770. Post 14414089 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 03, 2016, 10:56:24 AM


No. Evolution has stopped in humans. It basically stopped with regards to potential intelligence before we left Africa. So the point I am making is that there is no genetic reason for discriminating on the basis of ethnicity or "race". We all know this. There is no reason to feel sorry for Kofi Annan or Ban Ki-Moon (or Freddy Mercury for that matter). They haven't been dealt inferior genes. It's not a thing. They're far "better" humans in their field than anyone on this forum.

LOL!  Have hereditary traits stopped producing varying survival and reproduction advantages?  Of course not.  Five minutes in any single's bar will tell you that.

Obviously you are correct that there's no such thing as "inferior" genes in any absolute sense, but there never was. There are only genes better or more poorly suited for their environment.  But as you just noted yourself, those environments differ and because of that, there are obviously selection pressures that continue to produce dominant genotypes  that vary by environment. That is natural selection, and it's very mush alive and well. More alive than ever, I'd say.



3771. Post 14461316 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: blunderer on April 07, 2016, 01:01:58 PM
Saw this link on /r/bitcoin, interesting stuff.

http://meaningness.com/metablog/geeks-mops-sociopaths

I hate agreeing with stuff from the interweb Angry


So mops who idiotically bought at $1000 are too stupid to distinguish between creators, fanatics and sociopaths? who knew?



3772. Post 14478731 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

The HK CRTA said specifically that we were supposed to get SegWit this month. Where the hell is it? What will happen to the price if it is delayed?

Blocks are full. We need relief now! The TA is suggesting that we could have a huge rally if the network was able to handle the extra traffic.



3773. Post 14489528 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: BitUsher on April 09, 2016, 02:58:27 PM
The HK CRTA said specifically that we were supposed to get SegWit this month. Where the hell is it? What will happen to the price if it is delayed?

Blocks are full. We need relief now! The TA is suggesting that we could have a huge rally if the network was able to handle the extra traffic.

Now we see your true motivation ... Short term profits instead of concerns for the security or testing within segwit.

...

Segwit will likely be deployed later this month or early may. You have to understand that Core developers care more about testing and security than your short term price rallies.


Oh spare me the sanctimony.  Core devs had YEARS to come up with a scaling solution and it took an implicit threat from miners to get them to do the bare minimum and even now, they are not going to have it ready when they agreed to have it ready.  This isn't being cautious. This is obstructionism. 

You can't credibly claim that they are doing everything possible to get it up and running in a timely manner consistent with security and quality goals and still claim they don't need to rush.  Core is either incompetent and cannot do what users require or they are dishonest and dragging their heels.  Either way, they are not meeting the network's needs. 

I do not accept that it is simply impossible for Bitcoin to scale safe and securely. It may be impossible with current governance, but all that means it we need to change governance.  This kind of shit didn't happen when Gavin was in charge.

It's not about short term profits. It's about having confidence that the network's needs will be met. It's not reassuring when the people responsible for meeting those needs don't even have the will to do it to say nothing of the ability.



3774. Post 14521059 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Average blocksize up over 900KB again. Ripe for a spam attack. 
16K shorts vs. 26MM in $ longs on BFX, close to normal range. Could be a squeeze in either direction but not enough to really do much damage. I just can't see a moonshot until after SegWit because we're hard up against the blocksize limit.

Look for a possible double top at $430. There's a lot of momentum and resistance, so it could go either way.








3775. Post 14531652 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: r0ach on April 13, 2016, 09:31:15 PM
And anytime BillyJoeAllen posts about a supposed "block size armageddon", all you need to do is post this as reply:

It doesn't matter what % of blocks are full you stupid fucks.  All that matters is what the average transaction fee is.  Since there is no minimum transaction fee, the blocks are basically designed to be full at all times eventually even if you set it to 100MB blocks.  Segwit + hard fork in 2017 = 3.2MB blocks.  Then schnorr multisig on top of that should lower transaction sizes and increase TPS further.

It's easier to cause a network disruption if the network is already operating at maximum capacity. This is similar to the ease of creating a traffic jam during rush hour as opposed to another time. Fees will rise rapidly and chaotically if a spammer fills blocks. A prolonged attack will very likely cause the price to drop and allow the attacker to more than recover the fees by shorting. 

It's only a matter of time before this happens again.



3776. Post 14533595 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: r0ach on April 14, 2016, 12:55:31 AM
And anytime BillyJoeAllen posts about a supposed "block size armageddon", all you need to do is post this as reply:

It doesn't matter what % of blocks are full you stupid fucks.  All that matters is what the average transaction fee is.  Since there is no minimum transaction fee, the blocks are basically designed to be full at all times eventually even if you set it to 100MB blocks.  Segwit + hard fork in 2017 = 3.2MB blocks.  Then schnorr multisig on top of that should lower transaction sizes and increase TPS further.

It's easier to cause a network disruption if the network is already operating at maximum capacity. This is similar to the ease of creating a traffic jam during rush hour as opposed to another time. Fees will rise rapidly and chaotically if a spammer fills blocks. A prolonged attack will very likely cause the price to drop and allow the attacker to more than recover the fees by shorting.  

It's only a matter of time before this happens again.

Your post makes 0 sense because it implies just increase block size forever until it's able to handle all microtransactions on the planet.  Bitcoin can only function as a checkbook type device for large transactions at best, or as a clearing network at worst.  My personal estimates that I've researched to be able to accomplish this checkbook feat (as in cars, boats, houses, expensive but mainstream things that are several thousand in value) is around 8-10MB blocks (and we're talking trillions in market cap here).  3.2MB (what will be implemented in 2017) is starting to get close, so there's no reason to be dramatic and stupid about things.  After block size doubles from that 3.2MB point, most of the glass ceiling on price will be gone.



No, not forever, but we do need to have room for a critical mass of users. This will draw in more resources to work on the scaling problem.  If we don't have a critical mass (and I don't know how large that has to be except more than we have), development resources may be diverted to an altcoin(s) that can overcome our first mover advantage.   



3777. Post 14533900 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Lightning network is a bunch of sidechains. It will almost certainly not be economically viable until Bitcoin's market cap is orders of magnitude higher than it is now. To achieve that, we need on-chain scaling and we need it before another cryptocurrency diverts the resources necessary to make it happen. This is urgent.

Bitcoin is becoming more and more like a premined coin with the existing monetary base large and growing. Coins are more distributed, but that is a limited advantage because hodlers have less individual incentive to promote adoption due to free riders benefiting who don't participate in that promotion.

Before average blocksize approached the 1 MB limit, something else prevented blocks from filling up besides fees. xactions were effectively free and blocks still did not fill up. That something was orphan risk. Large blocks propagate slower and are at a higher risk of getting orphaned. That is why fears of spam-filled blocks is overblown. That risk is always present. That is a reason why some miners mine empty blocks.

SegWit is riskier than a 2MB hard fork because it is a more radical change to the protocol.  I hope it works, but there is uncertainty that needs to be factored in.  In my opinion, it is reckless to attempt such a radical change instead of a simple 2MB hard fork because it may prevent the rally that would otherwise occur at the halving in July.  Markets hate uncertainty.  The more complicated the upgrade, the easier it is for bears and trolls to spread technobabble FUD. The more complicated the upgrade, the more things that can go wrong, similar to a machine with more moving parts. 

We are not out of the woods yet. We are just getting to the woods. 










3778. Post 14554169 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

according to blockchain.info, almost all recent blocks are full except for those mined by antpool, which are completely empty. mempool filling back up. 



3779. Post 14574852 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: XCASH on April 16, 2016, 11:55:59 AM
Does somebody know ehat is causing this price movement?

I don't know, but it's got everyone posting here again. I though this thread was dead after weeks of nothing but sparse NLC sock posts. A ten dollar pump later and all the old timers are back posting here again. This latest pump is unusually slow and steady compared to the usual sharp violent ones. Perhaps it's more sustainable because of it.

It's only sustainable if price can raise at a rate slower than average blocksize. I don't see how that's possible because a belief in rising xaction fees has the effect of pushing demand forward or in other words causing people to transact now rather than later which causes the blocks to grow. A self-fulfilling prophecy. 

So either you think a fee market will emerge, in which case you contribute to the capacity problem or you think it won't, in which case you hold off and allow the market to think demand for blockspace is lower than it is,  which creates less incentive to fix the capacity problem. How are you gonna take advantage of a non-jammed network without contributing to the jam? 

The capacity problem will not be fixed if it is not seen as a problem and it won't be seen as a problem if the exchange price is high. Miners will continue to profit selling a shitty inferior product because you assholes keep buying it. I can't blame them. You can't buy as much blockspace as you used to for the same amount of coin. You can't xfer it as fast for the same fee. It can be censored by the PRC.  One Bitcoin is a smaller amount of total market cap than it used to be.  Even if it's undervalued, it's not nearly as undervalued as it was at $350, so why the hell are you buying now? Got a tax refund burning a hole in your pocket?



3780. Post 14575195 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: r0ach on April 17, 2016, 08:32:13 PM
It's only sustainable if price can raise at a rate slower than average blocksize. I don't see how that's possible because a belief in rising xaction fees has the effect of pushing demand forward or in other words causing people to transact now rather than later which causes the blocks to grow. A self-fulfilling prophecy. 

So either you think a fee market will emerge, in which case you contribute to the capacity problem or you think it won't, in which case you hold off and allow the market to think demand for blockspace is lower than it is,  which creates less incentive to fix the capacity problem. How are you gonna take advantage of a non-jammed network without contributing to the jam? 

The capacity problem will not be fixed if it is not seen as a problem and it won't be seen as a problem if the exchange price is high. Miners will continue to profit selling a shitty inferior product because you assholes keep buying it. I can't blame them. You can't buy as much blockspace as you used to for the same amount of coin. You can't xfer it as fast for the same fee. It can be censored by the PRC.  One Bitcoin is a smaller amount of total market cap than it used to be.  Even if it's undervalued, it's not nearly as undervalued as it was at $350, so why the hell are you buying now? Got a tax refund burning a hole in your pocket?

And anytime BillyJoeAllen posts about a supposed "block size armageddon", all you need to do is post this as reply:

It doesn't matter what % of blocks are full you stupid fucks.  All that matters is what the average transaction fee is.  Since there is no minimum transaction fee, the blocks are basically designed to be full at all times eventually even if you set it to 100MB blocks.  Segwit + hard fork in 2017 = 3.2MB blocks.  Then schnorr multisig on top of that should lower transaction sizes and increase TPS further.

If blocks were designed to be full, then how come they weren't full until recently despite effectively zero fees?  cripplecoiners never answer that.



3781. Post 14575621 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: kodtycoon on April 17, 2016, 09:45:41 PM
are the blocks full because of spam tx's or genuine ones? like is someone artificially filling blocks atm or is it natural?

define natural. All xactions that conform to the protocol get included. They are all natural. That's the whole point of having a distributed open source ledger, so that nobody is in the position of telling us what we can do.



3782. Post 14575713 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: kodtycoon on April 17, 2016, 10:07:28 PM
are the blocks full because of spam tx's or genuine ones? like is someone artificially filling blocks atm or is it natural?

define natural. All xactions that conform to the protocol get included. They are all natural. That's the whole point of having a distributed open source ledger, so that nobody is in the position of telling us what we can do.

you obviously know what i mean but are purposefully trying to sound clever.

i mean is someone running a bot to send pointless transactions just to fill the blocks to put pressure on the core devs to do something.

what else would i mean by artificially filling the blocks.

Why would filling blocks to pressure Core be illegitimate? Highlighting a weakness in a network in order to facilitate a fix is common with all open source projects.



3783. Post 14575832 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: kodtycoon on April 17, 2016, 10:05:57 PM
It's only sustainable if price can raise at a rate slower than average blocksize. I don't see how that's possible because a belief in rising xaction fees has the effect of pushing demand forward or in other words causing people to transact now rather than later which causes the blocks to grow. A self-fulfilling prophecy. 

So either you think a fee market will emerge, in which case you contribute to the capacity problem or you think it won't, in which case you hold off and allow the market to think demand for blockspace is lower than it is,  which creates less incentive to fix the capacity problem. How are you gonna take advantage of a non-jammed network without contributing to the jam? 

The capacity problem will not be fixed if it is not seen as a problem and it won't be seen as a problem if the exchange price is high. Miners will continue to profit selling a shitty inferior product because you assholes keep buying it. I can't blame them. You can't buy as much blockspace as you used to for the same amount of coin. You can't xfer it as fast for the same fee. It can be censored by the PRC.  One Bitcoin is a smaller amount of total market cap than it used to be.  Even if it's undervalued, it's not nearly as undervalued as it was at $350, so why the hell are you buying now? Got a tax refund burning a hole in your pocket?

And anytime BillyJoeAllen posts about a supposed "block size armageddon", all you need to do is post this as reply:

It doesn't matter what % of blocks are full you stupid fucks.  All that matters is what the average transaction fee is.  Since there is no minimum transaction fee, the blocks are basically designed to be full at all times eventually even if you set it to 100MB blocks.  Segwit + hard fork in 2017 = 3.2MB blocks.  Then schnorr multisig on top of that should lower transaction sizes and increase TPS further.

If blocks were designed to be full, then how come they weren't full until recently despite effectively zero fees?  cripplecoiners never answer that.

why would people do transactions simply because there is space? the fees were low for a long time because the blocksize was always more than big enough for the number of transactions. now that they are near full, the fee increases as competition for space increases. eventually, if the size doesnt increase, demand for space will lead to further increases in the cost to transact.

i dont think they were designed to be full, as that would require a dynamic blocksize. without dynamic blocksize, they are either not full due to low transaction count, just full when it reaches equilibrium, or over full when there is too much demand. The only way i see this becoming a problem is if demand is so high that transaction fees become intolerable, though i suspect that could happen very fast if transaction fees are dynamically increased as blocks become fuller.

It doesnt matter if most users dont see it as a problem, it will be fixed so long as the devs see it as a problem and miners agree. since when do decision makers take joe soaps opinions into account when deciding whether is an issue or not. Facebook users never considered how much data they were creating or how it would affect their beloved facebook did they? but yet facebook and their devs still pre-emtped the issue and solved it, regardless of whether the users considered it an issue or not.

 i dont see why bitcoin would be any different. facebook over loaded = facebook goes down. bitcoin over loaded, transactions get very expensive. this isnt a consideration that the vast majority of users will take into account ever so to say that blocks should be full simply because they its cheap to transact is wrong. to assume that users will front run others by sending transactions sooner because fees might increase soon is also wrong. to think that most users have that kind of foresight is wrong. to think that users will send transactions willy nilly just because they can do it very cheap is wrong. you are thinking about this as if people are rational beings and will always optimize their use of bitcoin and plan ahead, but people just arent like that.

ok, so you agree with me that blocks weren't designed to be full and so Roach is full of shit. There are two conflicting problems with opposite solutions. 1) chainbloat that can occur easily when fees are low. 2) service disruptions that can occur when xactions exceed capacity.  Where you stand on the blocksize issue depends on how you prioritize these problems.

I think it's silly to worry about chainbloat when the entire chain can still fit on a 64GB jump drive. We need to build a much bigger user base before we balance the need for blockspace with the need for capacity or we risk losing market share to altcoins that have lower fees and cheaper blockspace. This is already occurring and if we lose firstmover advantage, Bitcoin will become the MySpace of Crypto and recovery will be highly unlikely.



3784. Post 14575877 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: kodtycoon on April 17, 2016, 10:29:31 PM
are the blocks full because of spam tx's or genuine ones? like is someone artificially filling blocks atm or is it natural?

define natural. All xactions that conform to the protocol get included. They are all natural. That's the whole point of having a distributed open source ledger, so that nobody is in the position of telling us what we can do.

you obviously know what i mean but are purposefully trying to sound clever.

i mean is someone running a bot to send pointless transactions just to fill the blocks to put pressure on the core devs to do something.

what else would i mean by artificially filling the blocks.

Why would filling blocks to pressure Core be illegitimate? Highlighting a weakness in a network in order to facilitate a fix is common with all open source projects.

because its not genuine user transaction growth due to a need/want to use bitcoin. its a growth in transaction because someone wants the devs to make a change. its akin to a forced ddos. its not a ddos due to genuine user growth, its an attack to take down down a website. whether its done with good intentions or not, its still artificial.

So it's more or less exactly like the assholes who were filling the blocks with zero fee xactions to pressure Core NOT to increase the blocksize limit. At least Bigblock spammers are paying fees. It cuts both ways. If we shouldn't yield to the pressure of bigblock spammers, then we shouldn't yield to the pressure of smallblock spammers either. Once you start playing favorites with transactions, you become a central banker, the very thing Bitcoin was supposed to prevent.



3785. Post 14576022 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: r0ach on April 17, 2016, 11:01:45 PM
If there is no minimum transaction fee, there are numerous methods of making blocks full at all times no matter how big you make them either using little or no money to do so (such as the miners themselves).  This means the only relevant metric is how much the transaction fees are and not what % of blocks are full.  It's so simple even a caveman can understand it.

Yeah, I agree it's caveman logic. Kinda like telling women to piss their pants to prevent being raped. it may work sometimes, but there is a cost.  You're also likely gonna scare off suitors that you actually want.



3786. Post 14576822 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on April 18, 2016, 12:36:00 AM
BlockyJoeAllen come to dump his mind vomit all over these public pages again I see.

Hey genius, you think you got it all figured, where's your code? Where's you tests? Where's your data?

Enough with the mind vomit, time to put up or stfu.

Monday morning quarterbacks and backseat drivers are worse than clueless noobs, there is no reason for their ignorance, it's just willful.

I don't have to be an automotive engineer to know that a car with a 40 MPH governor is prolly not gonna be a bestseller.



3787. Post 14576896 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

> 4:1 long to short ratio on BFX again. People without money sure are bullish.



3788. Post 14601372 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote
bitcoin still has a flaw that it cannot scale.. you can take that anyway you want to. .. if its fud well too bad.. bitcoin still cannot scale. i have the intelligence to understand and accept this fact, while you on the other hand only have the intelligence to insult people who disagree with you. i think my little seven year old niece can do that and her brain isnt even fully developed yet.

once again, it doesnt matter if the price goes up since i am sitting on a pile of coins in cold storage.. if the price were to go lower to a point i feel is a buy then i might buy more. what i am not going to do is sit here an come up with different bullshiat to lie to myself and everyone like you do everyday.

+1 Aztecminer is exactly right and I am in the same position. You can keep pumping and make my cold storage coins more valuable if you want, but I'm not putting in one more dime until scaling gets fixed and it's not fixed. 






3789. Post 14613368 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Six blocks in the last 22 minutes. that will keep the mempool reasonably empty until difficulty gets adjusted.

There must be a shitload of 14nm miners coming on line. I just wish they all weren't in China. The higher Bitcoin goes, the more tempting of a target it is for the PRC unless the same party apparatchiks are using Bitcoin themselves to skirt the capital controls.




3790. Post 14613485 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: shmadz on April 21, 2016, 05:23:16 AM
Six blocks in the last 22 minutes. that will keep the mempool reasonably empty until difficulty gets adjusted.

There must be a shitload of 14nm miners coming on line. I just wish they all weren't in China. The higher Bitcoin goes, the more tempting of a target it is for the PRC unless the same party apparatchiks are using Bitcoin themselves to skirt the capital controls.



You're still moaning about this shit?

If you are actually worried about China you should just sell all your bitcoin and quit whining already.

Sheesh.

You told me to sell all my bitcoin at $375. Fuck you.



3791. Post 14618703 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Ibian on April 21, 2016, 02:31:09 PM
Get ready for lift off gents. Trump will force Mexico onto Bitcoin.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/pay-for-the-wall

Quote
On day 1 promulgate a "proposed rule" (regulation) amending 31 CFR 130.121 to redefine applicable financial institutions to include money transfer companies like Western Union, and redefine "account" to include wire transfers. Also include in the proposed rule a requirement that no alien may wire money outside of the United States unless the alien first provides a document establishing his lawful presence in the United States.

Looks like Mr. Trump is gonna have to ban Bitcoin to make his Mexican Paywall work. He probably won't tho.

Right?

  g... guys?
Not enough spics even know about bitcoin for this to be an issue - much less their deserted relatives below the border.


Bitcoin was designed to work even if it is banned.  The business opportunity will be in Mexico converting BTC for pesos at a favorable exchange rate and then reselling the same coins back in the U.S.



3792. Post 15610731 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Smallblocker shitstains are still stalling I see. SegWit was supposed to come out in April, but the stream got blocked and now almost every block is 0.99 MB. How the hell is Bitcoin going to handle a new ATH at 7 TPS? It  won't.  These Core assholes are dragging their heels intentionally, despite what they promised in Hongkong. Can't trust 'em. They wanna drive up fees so they can get free help from the non-blockstream core devs with their lightning network, which is years away.

just pump already so I can dump my coins and go away. Once they are gone, I ain't coming back.  the PRC got the miners by the balls which means no more censorship resistance.  Broke my heart. Bitcoin could have been beautiful.



3793. Post 15610914 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on July 17, 2016, 05:52:23 AM
The Chinese government are censoring my monies, potentially, somehow...



70% mining in red China. 80% of trades. ChiComs could crash it it to pennies by forcing miners to alter the protocol, banning exchanges, or just scaring the dumpmonkeys with stern words. I don't want crypto that won't be compromised. I want crypto that CAN'T be compromised.

We have centralization in mining, code development and, coming to a theater near you, nodes. How is this even the same coin I bought all those years ago?

It's supposed to be electronic cash, but it's got fees. Does cash have fees? It's cheaper than VISA, but it doesn't take ten minutes to swipe a credit card and there is consumer protection built in.

I hope somebody murders that Karpeles and frames Maxwell for it. Two shitbirds with one bullet.l



3794. Post 15633864 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

an hour and 19 minutes since the last block. They are averaging 23 minutes per block and they're all full.

this will cause the price to slump, which will kick more hashpower off the networks, causing further backlogs and higher fees in a viscous feedback loop. I told you bastards this would happen.

it's the Fullblocalypse!!



3795. Post 15634567 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: AlexGR on July 19, 2016, 10:03:40 AM
an hour and 19 minutes since the last block. They are averaging 23 minutes per block and they're all full.

this will cause the price to slump, which will kick more hashpower off the networks, causing further backlogs and higher fees in a viscous feedback loop. I told you bastards this would happen.

it's the Fullblocalypse!!

The time required to find a block has zero relation to "full blocks".

But you already know that, don't you Wink

As for the averages,

Block Generation Time:   
1 block: 10.1 minutes
3 blocks: 30.4 minutes
6 blocks: 1.0 hours

https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty

Must admit...this thread is a has been IMO

No good debates anymore just jay and the cronies talking meaningless trash

Price stable = less action
Price rises = OMGs, rockets, trains and champagne everywhere Cool

OK, Dipshit, let me spell it out for you. I'll try to use small words so you can follow along. The transactions that get broadcast don't give a shit about difficulty or how long since the last block, they just keep coming like chocolates on Lucy's conveyor belt. if blocks only come out every 20 minutes or so on average, then there isn't enough space for all the transactions that have piled up, so only the xactions with the highest fees get confirmed and the rest get stuck in an ever growing mempool. Theoretically they should be included when network traffic slows down enough to catch up, buy what if it doesn't slow down?

people aren't going to invest if it takes days to process their xactions and new people aren't sophisticated enough to know that they can include a higher fee to get through.  BFX does not have a dynamic fee feature and my "high priority" xaction hasn't been confirmed yet from four hours ago.  This will and should scare off new investment, $1.4Million net of which is required every day to keep price stable



3796. Post 15634732 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: AlexGR on July 19, 2016, 10:37:01 AM
OK, Dipshit, let me spell it out for you.
...
if blocks only come out every 20 minutes or so on average

Key word "if".

The average is 10.1mn.

billyjoeallen-and-his-shorts: REKT Tongue

depends on what time frame you are looking at, obviously. My shorts did get rekt, but I still have more coin than 90% of the people here.

raising fees isn't just expensive. There is a lot of recoding necessary. BFX is a major exchange, and they don't have dynamic fee ability yet. Neither do many important onramps.

and the most important issue is that there can be no more than 7 xactions/sec no matter how high the fees get.  Those core bastards lied in Honkkong to the miners. They had no intention of scaling the network until LN is ready. Where the fuck is SegWit? it was supposed to come out in April but you fuckers don't seem to be concerned.



3797. Post 15634943 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 19, 2016, 10:56:04 AM
an hour and 19 minutes since the last block. They are averaging 23 minutes per block and they're all full.

this will cause the price to slump, which will kick more hashpower off the networks, causing further backlogs and higher fees in a viscous feedback loop. I told you bastards this would happen.

it's the Fullblocalypse!!

Lots of people using Bitcoin? Bullish!

BFX is throwing all their withdrawals into the mempool and the xactions, ALL OF THEM, are getting stranded. A huge exchange like that, how long do you think it's gonna take before something like that affects the spot price?



3798. Post 15655190 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

We're down 19.5% from the $789 top, half a percent from a bear market, and still $500 down from the ATH two and a half years ago. I blame the delayed recovery on Core and the lack of on chain scaling.



3799. Post 15916633 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Y'all know me. I am looking for a list of other BFX victims so I can go lawyer shopping. If there is already a list, I need to know where it is so I can be on it. My account was 99.9% in USD and they stole my funds to compensate gamblers holding BTC.

They told me to change my password because it might have been compromised in the hack and then they told me there was a withdrawal freeze on my account because the password had been changed recently!  This is like Gox all over again.

I need names. PM me if you are a victim of BFX.

And because this is the Wall Observer, is anybody else suspicious of the price movement prior to the BFX shutdown?  It looks like someone was trading on inside information.  This whole thing stinks like Tibane's litterbox. 



3800. Post 15916931 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on August 14, 2016, 06:16:08 AM
Y'all know me. I am looking for a list of other BFX victims so I can go lawyer shopping. If there is already a list, I need to know where it is so I can be on it. My account was 99.9% in USD and they stole my funds to compensate gamblers holding BTC.

They told me to change my password because it might have been compromised in the hack and then they told me there was a withdrawal freeze on my account because the password had been changed recently!  This is like Gox all over again.

I need names. PM me if you are a victim of BFX.

And because this is the Wall Observer, is anybody else suspicious of the price movement prior to the BFX shutdown?  It looks like someone was trading on inside information.  This whole thing stinks like Tibane's litterbox. 
To clarify, did you have sufficient funds on Buttfinex? Actually, you were a lender of hangman's material on that exchange, so it blew up on you - my regards. Nice to see you again, tho hope things work out.

I had 0.1 BTC. The rest was in USD. Some of my funds were lent out at interest in the "funding" section, basically swaps but they don't call it that.  I was just trying to get my money out. I had withdrawn almost half before the shutdown. My dad is very sick and neither one of my parents can work while he is in treatment. I need that money.  I have to take time off work so I can take care of him during the next chemo treatment. 

I also am having a difficult time accessing my coins in cold storage. I can't upgrade my old wallet.dat file to the new format. I've been trying for weeks. Even have my own thread in the Tech support forum.

I need names of other victims. We didn't get hacked. BFX did. My funds were stolen by BFX. There was no hack of USD. If somebody breaks into a storage locker, the managers of the storage facility can't break into all the other lockers and auction off what they find to compensate the original victim. This is illegal. BFX claims I'm going to get about as much as I would if they were liquidated so I should accept their BFX token fake money IOUs. Think about that: If liquidation is the only other option, then they are tacitly admitting that they are insolvent.



3801. Post 16263688 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Howdy, folks. It's been a while. Soooo....no SegWit yet?

Core fucked you over, but you got your ego invested in defending them and now that it is more and more obvious (Yeah you, JJG) that they had no intention of any kind of on chain scaling at all ever, you try to tell yourself and anyone who will listen that it doesn't really matter much anyway.

So with Core stalling and the centralization of mining in China, I'm wondering why BTC is actually doing as well as it is. Could it be the leper with the most toes? or maybe the technicals haven't caught up with the fundamentals yet. I dunno. All I know is JJG is an idiot and I'm spending my coins like a sailor on leave. Hope it rockets. I still got lots to dump.






3802. Post 16314498 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

What did I miss?  I wasn't done dumping yet.



3803. Post 16314673 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

No SegWit yet, right?  No on-chain scaling in the works at all.
Mining still centralized in China with no plans at all to address the problem, right?

Bitcoin either completely useless or becoming so for payment processing? check.

Doesn't seem to be a good store of value.
Doesn't seem to be a good medium of exchange. 10 minutes for a confirmation?
Doesn't seem to be a useful unit of account.

Whatever. Keep buying or holding. I haven't quite paid off my house yet.



3804. Post 16314717 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 21, 2016, 01:40:07 AM
No SegWit yet, right?  No on-chain scaling in the works at all.
Mining still centralized in China with no plans at all to address the problem, right?

Bitcoin either completely useless or becoming so for payment processing? check.

Doesn't seem to be a good store of value.
Doesn't seem to be a good medium of exchange. 10 minutes for a confirmation?
Doesn't seem to be a useful unit of account.

Whatever. Keep buying or holding. I haven't quite paid off my house yet.


Yes, in other words the trolls are out, and you, BJA, are continuing to assert that you are in a good position no matter which way BTC prices go.. without really acknowledging that you engaged in substantially large shorts  in the upper $200s in late 2015 and in the upper $300s in May 2016...    Your batting average is not too good, and maybe the fact that you are here, asserting that the sky is falling could be a sign that peeps need to go "all in."   hahahahaha
   Wink Wink

Huh You know any perfect traders? Yeah, my shorts got rekt, but since I started buying at $6 and have already broke even, everything I do from here on out is pure profit. The only question is how much, so if I was a boob who bought near the ATH, I wouldn't be throwing stones.



3805. Post 25167860 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on November 24, 2017, 11:35:49 PM
Well well well. I see the blocksize/scaling gridlock is STILL ongoing. Dash is now running 2MB blocks. needless to say, I'm rotating out of cripplecoin into the crypto more faithful to Satoshi's vision. Thanks for buying all those coins I bought for $12, suckers. I literally have so many hundred dollar bills in my pocket that I don't know how many there are. 



Try counting them. You muppet Smiley

31. don't ask me to count the twenties.



3806. Post 25167976 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 24, 2017, 11:21:40 PM
Where's my Black Friday discount on BTC? This small 2% discount off ATH just isn't going to cut it. In fact, yesterday's dip wasn't even that big of a deal. I want a deep discount. Jimbo wants one too. I am sure.  Angry

Maybe if I want a doorbuster, I'm going to have to go to Wal-Mart.  Cry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_adgG8Ba2Q


I doubt that "Jimbo wants one too."  

There is a kind of mentality of  wanting or hoping for dips, or just preparing for dips.  Those are two different concepts.  If a dip comes, make lemonade out of the lemons.  You don't hope or want lemons, you merely take advantage of the lemons situation comes, which is nearly inevitable that lemons are going to come, from time to time.

Where's my Black Friday discount on BTC? This small 2% discount off ATH just isn't going to cut it. In fact, yesterday's dip wasn't even that big of a deal. I want a deep discount. Jimbo wants one too. I am sure.  Angry



I'm disappointed too. difficulty change is getting closer, all this new bitfinex/tether and flippening FUD. It looked like something was brewing. even the mempool looks ok.

I absolutely hate Bitfinex and believe the "FUD" about spoofy and Tether.  Grin However, Bitcoin does not need Bitfinex for it's own viability. There are plenty of other exchanges. I don't know why some of these twitter OG are coming to the defense of Bitfinex. I think the BTC economy will be a whole lot better without them. I don't even mind that they kicked us US customers to the curb.

Bitfinex FUD is FUD, as you seem to admit, and even though the crash Bitfinex would not kill bitcoin, I don't know why anyone would hope for such a crash.  

Sure, Bitfinex had several opportunities already to employ an exchange exit scam - and seems quite improbable that they are going to employ such, when it is not really necessary, in spite of the mucho bullshit FUD being spread about them.

Regarding, kicking out USA customers, I have mixed feelings about it, since I was personally affected and kicked out of their exchange - but I cannot really blame them for their exercising business discretion or to credit them with any kind of bad or malicious motive because of such business decision.

BFX lost a shitload of coins. I had no coins in my account. they stole %36 anyway to compensate the account holders who did have coins. So not only did they fail to safeguard the coins, but then they socialized the losses. this was years ago, but they NEVER PAID ME BACK. they are not a legitimate exchange. I am baffled that anyone can still take them seriously or do business with them.



3807. Post 25168127 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on November 24, 2017, 11:46:59 PM
Lol that billyjoeallen-guy was storting bitcoin in the $200s and $300s. Don't take him too serious.

I lost a bunch in my daytrading account, sure, but i had much much more in cold storage. Search my comments going back to 2011. I am an early adopter and former permabull. I made so much profit that I quit my job. Now I'm into Dash. I bought in at $80. Currently sitting pretty and HODLing.



3808. Post 25168214 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: DaRude on November 24, 2017, 11:50:33 PM
Well well well. I see the blocksize/scaling gridlock is STILL ongoing. Dash is now running 2MB blocks. needless to say, I'm rotating out of cripplecoin into the crypto more faithful to Satoshi's vision. Thanks for buying all those coins I bought for $12, suckers. I literally have so many hundred dollar bills in my pocket that I don't know how many there are. 



So now you'll have no reason to continue to post here, you'll delete your account and move on to dash forum??...Pretty please??

Or just stay here and continue to trolllololol

The dust left in my old BTC accounts is worth more than many portfolios here. I still have a vested interest.



3809. Post 25171121 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: realr0ach on November 25, 2017, 01:47:50 AM
Well well well. I see the blocksize/scaling gridlock is STILL ongoing. Dash is now running 2MB blocks. needless to say, I'm rotating out of cripplecoin into the crypto more faithful to Satoshi's vision. Thanks for buying all those coins I bought for $12, suckers. I literally have so many hundred dollar bills in my pocket that I don't know how many there are.  
Look what the cat drug in!!!!     Shocked Shocked Shocked

I would say that technically all cryptocurrency holders are dumb money:



More like house money. I already cashed out more than 20X my buy in, so any additional profits from here are just gravy. I can't possibly loose.



3810. Post 25172835 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 25, 2017, 02:27:09 AM
Well well well. I see the blocksize/scaling gridlock is STILL ongoing. Dash is now running 2MB blocks. needless to say, I'm rotating out of cripplecoin into the crypto more faithful to Satoshi's vision. Thanks for buying all those coins I bought for $12, suckers. I literally have so many hundred dollar bills in my pocket that I don't know how many there are.  
Look what the cat drug in!!!!     Shocked Shocked Shocked

I would say that technically all cryptocurrency holders are dumb money:



More like house money. I already cashed out more than 20X my buy in, so any additional profits from here are just gravy. I can't possibly loose.

Yeah.. great job.  You got yourself $3,100 plus some $20s that you don't want to count.  You made a "killing."

That's just literally my pocket money. You know, just in case I wanna fly to Europe without going to the bank first.



3811. Post 25173287 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: DaRude on November 25, 2017, 03:14:29 AM
Well well well. I see the blocksize/scaling gridlock is STILL ongoing. Dash is now running 2MB blocks. needless to say, I'm rotating out of cripplecoin into the crypto more faithful to Satoshi's vision. Thanks for buying all those coins I bought for $12, suckers. I literally have so many hundred dollar bills in my pocket that I don't know how many there are.  
Look what the cat drug in!!!!     Shocked Shocked Shocked

I would say that technically all cryptocurrency holders are dumb money:



More like house money. I already cashed out more than 20X my buy in, so any additional profits from here are just gravy. I can't possibly loose.

Yeah.. great job.  You got yourself $3,100 plus some $20s that you don't want to count.  You made a "killing."

That's just literally my pocket money. You know, just in case I wanna fly to Europe without going to the bank first.

And yet you're still here. On a forum where you only have pocket money invested in?? Do you also go to chuck e cheese and troll others how it's all a sham?

If it doesn't scale, it's for sale. It's all about market share. Dash is gaining because it scales. BTC is losing ground because it doesn't.



3812. Post 25174170 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: Icygreen on November 25, 2017, 03:40:27 AM
Not to often I've got to put legendary accounts on ignore. Probably a sodl account.  
Bullish me thinks!

I've been harping on this blocksize thing for three years. Now I see it as a symptom of a bigger problem: governance.



3813. Post 25176211 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: windjc on November 25, 2017, 05:19:38 AM
Well well well. I see the blocksize/scaling gridlock is STILL ongoing. Dash is now running 2MB blocks. needless to say, I'm rotating out of cripplecoin into the crypto more faithful to Satoshi's vision. Thanks for buying all those coins I bought for $12, suckers. I literally have so many hundred dollar bills in my pocket that I don't know how many there are.  
Look what the cat drug in!!!!     Shocked Shocked Shocked

I would say that technically all cryptocurrency holders are dumb money:



More like house money. I already cashed out more than 20X my buy in, so any additional profits from here are just gravy. I can't possibly loose.

Yeah.. great job.  You got yourself $3,100 plus some $20s that you don't want to count.  You made a "killing."

That's just literally my pocket money. You know, just in case I wanna fly to Europe without going to the bank first.

And yet you're still here. On a forum where you only have pocket money invested in?? Do you also go to chuck e cheese and troll others how it's all a sham?

If it doesn't scale, it's for sale. It's all about market share. Dash is gaining because it scales. BTC is losing ground because it doesn't.

If you think Dash scales without becoming centralized, you're nuts.



It does. basically the nodes become miners and vice versa, kind of like the way the bitcoin client worked when I first got started, only with much beefier hardware.

https://medium.com/@eduffield222/how-to-enabling-on-chain-scaling-2ffab5997f8b



3814. Post 25222885 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: DaRude on November 26, 2017, 12:23:18 AM
What's up with Finex?

BFX and Tether are owned by the same people. Don't trust them.



3815. Post 25275317 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Quote from: Elwar on November 26, 2017, 01:20:29 PM
And we get to deal with pirates. This should be fun.

Meantime 9,000? It's over 9,000?

Wow.

Pirates and waves. Most people that hear about it first usually bring up the waves too. 100 foot waves. And hurricanes.

Seateading again.  Dumbest AnCap idea ever. You undermine the economic and monetary policies of several major military powers simultaneously to create a hotbed of gambling prostitution drug use and money laundering. You think international waters will save you?

Two words: MK48 torpedoes.



3816. Post 35687673 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.53h):

I'd like to think that whoever is trying to reset my password knows how well-respected and admired I am 'round these parts.



3817. Post 42069144 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Has anyone noticed how Dash has been the bellweather for many recent market moves? It seems to precede the Bicoin turns by anywhere from a minute to two hours. Dash has a tiniy market cap and paper thin volume, so this should not be the case, IMO.



3818. Post 42072040 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: megadeth on July 13, 2018, 03:19:20 AM
Has anyone noticed how Dash has been the bellweather for many recent market moves? It seems to precede the Bicoin turns by anywhere from a minute to two hours. Dash has a tiniy market cap and paper thin volume, so this should not be the case, IMO.


Billys back??  Grin
Look what just happened! Dash is an amazing leading indicator. I still don't know why.



3819. Post 42073610 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 13, 2018, 04:02:27 AM
Has anyone noticed how Dash has been the bellweather for many recent market moves? It seems to precede the Bicoin turns by anywhere from a minute to two hours. Dash has a tiniy market cap and paper thin volume, so this should not be the case, IMO.

Of course, you would come back to this thread to bring up some stupid-ass cock-a-mie off-topic alt-coin pumping theory that makes little to no sense, except for yourself to attempt to suggest that the tail is wagging the dog rather than the other way around.  go figure?   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

By the way, how is the sale of all your BTC in the $200s going and subsequent attempt to short (and pump your short) at $500?   Tongue

Were you smart enough to get back in at some point prior to $19k?

I sold all the way up, Bro.  I was down to dust at the top. Bought some really cool night vision goggles on purse.io.  I can't really use them on the SeaDoo I bought before that. Or the convertible. or the other convertible. or the motorcycle. or the house. How u doin?

I'm not pumping anything. I just wonder why a coin with a tiny market cap seems to lead the market. I'm asking a question.



3820. Post 42074324 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 13, 2018, 05:25:12 AM

Has anyone noticed how Dash has been the bellweather for many recent market moves? It seems to precede the Bicoin turns by anywhere from a minute to two hours. Dash has a tiniy market cap and paper thin volume, so this should not be the case, IMO.

Of course, you would come back to this thread to bring up some stupid-ass cock-a-mie off-topic alt-coin pumping theory that makes little to no sense, except for yourself to attempt to suggest that the tail is wagging the dog rather than the other way around.  go figure?   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

By the way, how is the sale of all your BTC in the $200s going and subsequent attempt to short (and pump your short) at $500?   Tongue

Were you smart enough to get back in at some point prior to $19k?

Oooo that just sounds painful. Ouch

BJA has a fairly interesting history, for a seeming bitcoin OG that has also been talking his book, and really trying to get others to follow him in his selling and/or shorting.  He had admitted it several times, too, but he also admitted a few times when he had taken pretty strong positions and got rekt pretty bad, too... which is sad - but utlmately stupid since he was trying to act like he was the smartest person in the room when he was taking some of those positions.

He also has a pretty famous quote in the "new gentlemen elite thread" in 2011, where he said he was going to ride this pig (referring to bitcoin) wherever it takes him - but then again, he soon did not even follow his own supposed bullish statement.

So, it does seem that he is the same account, but you really cannot tell for sure if someone bought out the account, either.

I got in because I loved the economics of Bitcoin. I'm an econogeek, not a technogeek. I never suspected there would be a transaction capacity issue. Then I came to the conclusion that it was a governance issue and the blocksize thing was just a symptom.  My rekt trading positions as it turned out didn't matter too much because Bitfinex stole 1/3 of my account anyway when they got "hacked". I actually lucked out because it took so long to recover my private keys from an obsolete wallet.dat file that the price blew sky high. Of course i still sold too much too early, but I had forgotten about the coins in about a half dozen exchanges that i had scattered around to diversify my risk. sold them too eventually.  I actually felt like a chump at the top thinking "what the hell am I going to do with all this depreciating fiat?"

I loved Bitcoin, but it's MySpace. I'm looking for the FaceBook of crypto. Bitcoin was pioneering, but a pioneer is a guy lying face down in a pool of his own blood with arrows in his back.  it's something to learn from.  



3821. Post 42074938 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 13, 2018, 05:43:09 AM
I really should consider trading BTC.

I can usually see the indicators of a jump. ie someone with a huge sell wall trying to push prices down before pumping them, high rated individuals on localbitcoins trying to buy very large amounts of bitcoins, etc.

It's just too stressful though. I'd rather just buy and hodl.
The problem at least for now is that you have to trade on an exchange, the easiest type of business in the world to embezzle from and also the biggest target for hackers.  Not only that, but if there is a fork, you may only get the coins on one branch.  Decentralized exchanges promise to fix that, but again Etherium has a scaling issue of its own.

Trading for me was way harder than it looks and VERY stressful.  I'm smart enough to know I'm not smart enough to do it consistently well. We need good traders to reduce volatility so I hope you do well.

Cheers.



3822. Post 42077245 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 13, 2018, 06:23:15 AM


In spite of your ongoing naysaying, Bitcoin remains the cypto that is providing the most value and security to the space on an ongoing basis, and other coins projects, to the extent that they are profitable at all relative to bitcoin, are for the most part profitable only because bitcoin maintains a kind of core security and considerably more decentralization than any other project that is merely creating the appearance of decentralization (to the extent that they are able and want to spout out decentralization talking points).  So get the fuck out of here with proclamations that some other coin is better, and that bitcoin is some kind of old generation, because hardly no one in this thread is going to believe that kind of bullshit.



Sure, at 43% market dominance according to CoinmarketCap. Down from what? over 90%?  In the 1970,s America was the largest car manufacturing country in the world. in the 1990s, Yahoo dominated search.  Do you wanna be in Yahoo or in Google? I'm not downplaying Bitcoin's historical significance and I firmly believe Satoshi Nakamoto will go down in history as the most important inventor since Tim Berners-Lee or maybe even Gutenberg, but there's lots of stores of value (precious metals, real estate) and relatively few except fiat and credit that are used as a medium of exchange, which is where we can change the world.

The reason I am here is because I am trying to figure out how to determine market share when all we have is transaction volume and Market cap to go on. Transaction volume means nothing when TXs are almost free as with most coins. Market Cap is just last trading price multiplied by number of coins in circulation. It has little to do with which crypto is actually being used. Am I missing some other relevant metric?

On public blockchains, it should be relatively simple to calculate dollar value of transactions/block, but nobody is doing that to my knowledge. I wonder why?

These whales pushing the market around-what are they thinking? How do they determine value or is is all just Greater Fool Theory order flows?



3823. Post 42110858 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: Torque on July 13, 2018, 12:22:12 PM
I sold all the way up, Bro.  I was down to dust at the top. Bought some really cool night vision goggles on purse.io.  I can't really use them on the SeaDoo I bought before that. Or the convertible. or the other convertible. or the motorcycle. or the house. How u doin?

Lol, guy bragging about how he liquidated all his bitcoin for a bunch of depreciating assets to stroke his own ego.... to Bitcoin holders who are in it for the long term gains and possibly early retirement.

How about we won't be broke in 10 years. Like u, Bro?

I get a regular stream of income from my masternode. The amount varies depending on trading price, but I don't have to worry about market timing which admittedly I suck at.



3824. Post 42111354 (copy this link) (by billyjoeallen) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on July 13, 2018, 12:30:37 PM
I sold all the way up, Bro.  I was down to dust at the top. Bought some really cool night vision goggles on purse.io.  I can't really use them on the SeaDoo I bought before that. Or the convertible. or the other convertible. or the motorcycle. or the house. How u doin?

Lol, guy bragging about how he liquidated all his bitcoin for a bunch of depreciating assets to stroke his own ego.... to Bitcoin holders who are in it for the long term gains and possibly early retirement.

How about we won't be broke in 10 years. Like u, Bro?

And who brags about a SeaDoo and some night vision goggles? Trolls are all 12 year old boys now? Wtf does a grown man do with night vision goggles?

I protect my huge stack of benjamins.