All posts made by CoinDox in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 3517809 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: barbs on November 08, 2013, 08:33:10 AM
I swear my theory is they match off the best ones for themselves and slow down the queue. Thats what I suspected in April, best way to obsfiscate it is with lag.

Goxxed again, classic.

Can you please clarify what exactly do you mean by matching off the best order for themselves and slow down the que? This is really interesting if true.



2. Post 3535314 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: samson on November 10, 2013, 12:02:02 AM
Looks like we bounced, for now.

Yes, lucky that. Someone sold about 8000 BTC down to $344 then bought the price right back up to $368 by purchasing a few hundred off the market.

I wonder if they're now waiting for suckers to place bids before dumping again.


Where do you see the coins coming from the same source if you do not mind me asking?



3. Post 3535505 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bw9CALKOvAI



4. Post 3535689 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: samson on November 10, 2013, 01:08:50 AM
It's pure manipulation. Read the forum history, there's a lot to read but you can pinpoint certain people on this forum who pop up just before ATH's and pump the price to the max then dump relentlessly. Then patiently wait to do it again.

Yes this thread is ripe with truth if you read between the lines.



5. Post 3535761 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: theonewhowaskazu on November 10, 2013, 01:18:13 AM
Well that was weird. Looks like it was a one-hit-wonder by the bears, though, we're on our way back up again.

The unloading phase is done in segments. This allows more buyers to enter, giving the market mover a maximally efficient price for his original holdings.



6. Post 3535826 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: samson on November 10, 2013, 01:24:44 AM
China is waking up and when they see the price so low they might start selling like crazy. The bear could have made a timing mistake.

I'd say he timed it right if he sold and is looking for cheap coins.

Inspiring anyone to sell like crazy is done to buy much cheaper.

Theoretically, how many coins would it take to induce such a move? Is it likely one entity or is it multiple colluding?



7. Post 3536132 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 10, 2013, 02:12:54 AM
*just got back home.


OMG i want to buy so badly and i place bids but they only show as pending

anyone know whats up with cavirtex?

It is acting up for me too.



8. Post 3536176 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 10, 2013, 02:25:38 AM
*just got back home.


OMG i want to buy so badly and i place bids but they only show as pending

anyone know whats up with cavirtex?

It is acting up for me too.

ya its like that for everyone.

pending.

hope the fix this like NOW  Tongue


Let the F5 mashing begin - never before has so much ridden on a single key!



9. Post 3536227 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 10, 2013, 02:33:49 AM
*just got back home.


OMG i want to buy so badly and i place bids but they only show as pending

anyone know whats up with cavirtex?

It is acting up for me too.

ya its like that for everyone.

pending.

hope the fix this like NOW  Tongue

Maybe they're overloaded - reminds me of Gox.

Gox may be crappy but the other exchanges will have a lot of catching up to do.


cavirtex seems to do good b4 on high volume.

not sure what's up...

Well whenever it is fixed, it is going to be a shit-show.



10. Post 3536279 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: CoinDox on November 10, 2013, 01:19:31 AM
Well that was weird. Looks like it was a one-hit-wonder by the bears, though, we're on our way back up again.

The unloading phase is done in segments. This allows more buyers to enter, giving the market mover a maximally efficient price for his original holdings.

Part 2?



11. Post 3536310 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 10, 2013, 02:45:51 AM
virtex is fixed now yaye

Might be fixed but my order @256.4 did not go through so naaaaaay!



12. Post 3536362 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: worldlybedouin on November 10, 2013, 02:58:01 AM
Alright guys, whats your best guess/advice for a noob trying to figure out when to buy in?  Only have $200 in BitStamp...so I'd like to make it worthwhile.  Suggestions?

My advice is to hold onto your cash, since the simple fact that you are asking that question already tells me that any number anyone says to you right now will persuade you one way or another. This is not investing!

If you are a gambling man, then don't think about the price and just buy in at any time and sit on it.



13. Post 3536438 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: worldlybedouin on November 10, 2013, 03:13:46 AM
Alright guys, whats your best guess/advice for a noob trying to figure out when to buy in?  Only have $200 in BitStamp...so I'd like to make it worthwhile.  Suggestions?
At this moment there is to much volatility, the price can go anywhere. I'm bearish right now so my opinion is biased, but I think it's a very risky moment to buy bitcoins. I would wait three days more.

I guess my question clearly illustrates my emotional need to "buy in" clouding any good judgement.  Tongue

Right, that being said, I may as well get to bed...have an early day tomorrow working the 9-5!  Cheers mates and good luck!

Smart move Smiley



14. Post 3536754 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

If there is enough pressure to move it past 310 (huge bid wall), we have room to fall for a bit.

Personally, it seems that whoever is running this waits for the Bids to become healthy enough to then be able to sell into the buying pressure so as to get the full value out of their original investment.



15. Post 3536801 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: revans on November 10, 2013, 04:14:58 AM
GOX has the plunge protection team trying their best to stop the price collapsing

It looks like it may not be enough...



16. Post 3536831 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on November 10, 2013, 04:18:33 AM
Literally sitting here with a bag of popcorn.

no joke.

Let me know how you feel when we break back into the 100's


To be speculatively honest, real price should be around $180 range. This is based on the estimated increase in value originally brought on-line by the influx of China traders. The rest of the "value" is good ol' fashion wall-stream syndrome,



17. Post 3536874 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: revans on November 10, 2013, 04:30:03 AM
Hope those watching on Gox can see the blatant manipulation attempting to move the price back up.

I see but I can't do anything about it! I had a pending withdraw for 2 months in CAD and I had to call in mid week last week to have it canceled in case I should need it this weekend. Good thing I did...



18. Post 3537127 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: bitjoint on November 10, 2013, 05:12:00 AM
It's a fight!

It's a trap!



+10 for how true this actually is...



19. Post 3537429 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: pera on November 10, 2013, 06:08:28 AM
Maybe I'm crazy but I'm expecting something like this:



This made me laugh.  Cheesy

I don't know why, until now it's 100% accurate Cheesy

Personally, I think this will hold, this is classic re-distribution VSA http://imgur.com/0km9Q0r



20. Post 3537855 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: windjc on November 10, 2013, 07:54:50 AM
I am very skeptical of this quick recovery.

On Bitfinex, there is no loan money left, which means every margin trader is currently "in" with BTC purchases. And Bitstamp is still lagging tremendously.

Everyone looks like the are convinced that the correction is over.

Guess we will see.



While that may be true, how large of a portion do the short-traders make-up of the general btc investing public? Then we can gauge the effect it might have on the bid/ask balance.



21. Post 3537952 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 10, 2013, 08:35:03 AM
Panic some more, please. It is so fun to watch Smiley


What we are seeing now was not so hard to predict:

Flashcrash alert.

The rest of the week may be choppy since we are already so much higher than last week. The weekly gains tend to normalize, and I would not be surprised to see Sunday at around 280-300 like we are now.

Retest of previous ATH from the above in the form of flashcrash is probably coming. I don't believe sub-250 territory will be visited except during the flashcrash.

Risk of a change in main trend is low.

Looking forward, it is better to buy now than wait. I would be wary if price goes 600+ in November or 700+ in December, since they may be overextended.

BUT

A real crash will have the following characteristic:
- price will have risen really high, really quickly over several weeks
- 100,000s of bitcoins are brought to the market by large manipulators that are sure of their ability to tip it over
- Some bitcoins will be sold to induce the forced closure of leveraged positions, resulting in a flashcrash
- Price will quickly bounce back to almost where it was
- The following day/night lots of bitcoins will be sold to destroy the market sentiment and start a panic
- Exchanges, information services, this forum, etc. will be ddosed, mass media publicity will be enormous and negative
- Price will plummet so that about 3 weeks' gains will be erased (about 75% from the high), although it will remain above the previous ATH (in this case $266) by a clear margin.

I won't go into details why it happens this way, but a big reason is that exchanges utterly lack liquidity and btc/usd-rate is therefore at a mercy of manipulators.

This is a serious question. Do you have a book? If so, where can I get it? I think your insight might prove to be eerily on the mark...



22. Post 3541062 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on November 08, 2013, 08:00:16 PM
I was kidding, it was a nod to proudhon.

I'm of the opinion that next bear market will be the most devastating and the longest one so far (worse than 2011) because everyone is caught up in the belief that if only they hold long enough, they cannot possibly lose out on BTC, no matter their entry price. Every dip is a buying opportunity etc.

Furthermore, the current bubble developed very quickly after only 7 months between former alltime high. So, it's a bubble on top of a bubble in the same year.

We can talk about that once we actually top out. So far, we haven't even doubled from the 266 high.

Lets get some terminology settled. A bubble is part of the hype cycle and is applicable here but overall insignificant. When in Bitcoin history it is growing at a steady rate. This growth is exponential and may or may not be a bubble. But the ups and downs are just noise.

What you refer to as a bubble is actually a run on the bank (people panicking looking to withdraw and see what is backing Bitcoin)

Bitcoin has had 7 such runs, 5 significant one's and 2 during run between peeks June 2011 and April 2013. What we can see is Bitcoin is more resilient than both free bank's and those backed by a central bank. (Bitcoin has not gone bankrupt)  

The average time between each run on the "bank" is prolonged by over enthusiasm. (That enthusiasm is existing depositors re-depositing a false feedback loop)

There was a bubble in 2011 as the growth when viewed on the log scale shows. April 2013 is not. It is my opinion, that we should see a growth spurt every 6 months until the next order of magnitude, followed by a bank run from the unfaithful. (The less narcissistic the investment the more sustainable the growth)  -

Typically Adams investing style grows Bitcoin the fastest.

What is Adams style investing?



23. Post 3544350 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: Holliday on November 10, 2013, 11:22:37 PM
Can anyone explain why anyone would sell on Btc-e for less than they could get on Stamp?  Is it because of trading between LTC and others or something?

I've long been of the opinion that some of the price disparities between the exchanges are being intentionally exacerbated. I believe there are certain individuals that can profit from this situation.

I could be off my rocker too.

I would say from the heavy manipulation on Gox witnessed last night this is spot on.



24. Post 3544520 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: jojo69 on November 11, 2013, 01:11:22 AM
Gox, BTC withdrawals going like clockwork, nothing to see here

+1 Can confirm withdrew minutes ago.



25. Post 3545825 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: molecular on November 11, 2013, 05:20:33 AM
Freedom is becoming an illusion.

That's why Bitcoin is so important. It gives people a chance to retain (or gain) their freedom of economic transaction.

Its rising value is a symptom of people cherishing freedom.

And what's the true value of freedom?


Between 340 & 350 USD  Grin



26. Post 3552189 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Concidering this whole GOX situation, BTC price seems to be holding up, so this is actually... good news?



27. Post 3561270 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: notthematrix on November 12, 2013, 05:01:30 PM
I just don't see how bitcoin could become a major currency to buy and sell goods without the volatility issue being mitigated first. This is why I think the 400 billion market cap should come first, and afterwards the whole currency shabang.

well CCTV will explain it to you....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKEZQ4RFghE
China wants to dump the dollar , is just that simple ,, they want a currency beyond political control ,
a consensus currency more nutral as the red cross.


bull$hit ..guess who holds most of the bonds? ...hmmm  Roll Eyes

exactly! China does , so if the whole population has its savings etc in bitcoins they can savely dump them whitout
riots , of chineese population Smiley
and when done saveley switch to a BTC economy.


I mean no offence by this, but do you read what you write? How many businesses, how many regulations, shit how many high ranked officials who rely on fiat need to be "reconstructed" in order to adopt it as a national currency?! This is not la la land. If the wrong foot is stepped on before given a peice of the pie it's toodles to btc.

Note though how I did not say crypto currencies... If one falls another will absorb the value! The hard part is knowing which one.



28. Post 3561388 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: notthematrix on November 12, 2013, 06:45:08 PM
I just don't see how bitcoin could become a major currency to buy and sell goods without the volatility issue being mitigated first. This is why I think the 400 billion market cap should come first, and afterwards the whole currency shabang.

well CCTV will explain it to you....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKEZQ4RFghE
China wants to dump the dollar , is just that simple ,, they want a currency beyond political control ,
a consensus currency more nutral as the red cross.


bull$hit ..guess who holds most of the bonds? ...hmmm  Roll Eyes

exactly! China does , so if the whole population has its savings etc in bitcoins they can savely dump them whitout
riots , of chineese population Smiley
and when done saveley switch to a BTC economy.


I mean no offence by this, but do you read what you write? How many businesses, how many regulations, shit how many high ranked officials who rely on fiat need to be "reconstructed" in order to adopt it as a national currency?! This is not la la land. If the wrong foot is stepped on before given a peice of the pie it's toodles to btc.

Note though how I did not say crypto currencies... If one falls another will absorb the value! The hard part is knowing which one.

as long as they are the first in bitcoin they don't care about fiat , if they can replace it they wil simply do so
they only worry of officials is riots of chineese locals witch will not happen if they can invest in a currency not connected to banks , bitcoin is digital gold , and can and will replace fiat infaltables as dollar and euro.



You say this with so much conviction but have no idea about the true time and power it takes to produce such a change in the system. Hence, such a small word like "if" carries with it more weight than the remainder of your entire statement... I am not outright disagreeing with you as I see fiat on the decline, but you have to truly realize what it is btc is up against.



29. Post 3563111 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: mccorvic on November 12, 2013, 10:02:58 PM
Looks like someone setup and executed the perfect bear trap on Stamp. Nice.

I did not catch the depth charts on that move, I was not at my desk when it happened. Do you have snapshot?



30. Post 3573321 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: rampantparanoia on November 13, 2013, 09:08:07 PM

define

mission to marsÉ



31. Post 3573338 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

half mil ask wall @ 450



32. Post 3576215 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: MikeH on November 14, 2013, 02:22:39 AM
there's never been a bubble, just large holders dumping to accumulate more and scaring people away for a while..


+1 And it will happen again after the US decides on its digital currency regulatory policies on the 18th of this month. The news will create more questions than it will provide answers, giving the perfect opportunity to induce some panic into the public.

*edit There HAVE been bubbles in the past, but this likely is not one of them... yet



33. Post 3596238 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: gizmoh on November 15, 2013, 10:28:35 PM
Chinese do give a fuck about the west, below 2700.

It is 6:30 am right now there... I think whoever did this dump has great execution. They will soon follow...



34. Post 3598776 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 16, 2013, 04:38:05 AM
I really don't understand the "all or nothing" mentality of some people. Hold some, trade some. Even when you lose, you win.
You're neglecting opportunity cost.

What if you spend hours per day trading for months, just to end up where you would have been with a buy and hold strategy? What else could you have done with your life during those months?

This is so very true...



35. Post 3607036 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on November 16, 2013, 11:49:33 PM
http://www.mql5.com/en/charts/1048012/btcusd-h1-distel-enterprise

technical analysis and forecast for next week. we've been trading within an ascending channel as indicated by the pink lines. I expect price to stay within the channel from now until early Monday morning, so trades may be placed accordingly using the top and bottom as exit and entry points with expected gains around $30 per BTC. The yellow lines correspond to a hidden divergence pattern which indicates the the trend will continue upward thus I expect the market to remain bullish. Even with reduced volume during the weekend price still remained bullish, as indicated by the ascending channel. I expect R1 to turn into a support level although i accept that price may dip to S1,S2, or,S3. one could place buy orders at these levels and adjust risk and reward  as necessary. If price moves below S3 I would not feel comfortable placing buy orders and would wait for the price to level out. Finally I expect price to move upward similar to last week with gains in the $100-$200 range.

Note

I do however expect significant resistance at the $500 and $600 levels. If things remain bullish at these levels there might be opportunities to trade as price bounces off the resistance  

You are actually serious with this stuff? I mean you actually believe it?

Hey man, leave him alone, he just likes to draw don't you see?!



36. Post 3607078 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Love_and_Squalor on November 16, 2013, 11:58:19 PM
http://www.mql5.com/en/charts/1048012/btcusd-h1-distel-enterprise

technical analysis and forecast for next week. we've been trading within an ascending channel as indicated by the pink lines. I expect price to stay within the channel from now until early Monday morning, so trades may be placed accordingly using the top and bottom as exit and entry points with expected gains around $30 per BTC. The yellow lines correspond to a hidden divergence pattern which indicates the the trend will continue upward thus I expect the market to remain bullish. Even with reduced volume during the weekend price still remained bullish, as indicated by the ascending channel. I expect R1 to turn into a support level although i accept that price may dip to S1,S2, or,S3. one could place buy orders at these levels and adjust risk and reward  as necessary. If price moves below S3 I would not feel comfortable placing buy orders and would wait for the price to level out. Finally I expect price to move upward similar to last week with gains in the $100-$200 range.

Note

I do however expect significant resistance at the $500 and $600 levels. If things remain bullish at these levels there might be opportunities to trade as price bounces off the resistance 

You are actually serious with this stuff? I mean you actually believe it?

its just a way to make educated guesses based on probabilities. it has to be combined with money management as well to be effective. Is it really that absurd though?
 

To be honest technical analysis with proper money management yields returns yes - but a Bot can easily do that for you if you back-tests it effectively. With pure technicals, no true knowledge is gained about the underlying forces involved - the drivers of the prices and the delicate balance of the public's sentiment, big holders book's, and BTC's underlying fundamentals.



37. Post 3621544 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: sonofliberty on November 18, 2013, 09:25:53 AM

Maybe people are starting to believe the exact opposite of what the government is saying.

+1



38. Post 3621605 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: TERA on November 18, 2013, 09:38:35 AM
Quote from: rpietila link=topic=178336.msg3620642#msg3620642 date=1384760328
Do not swing-trade or daytrade unless you know. I don't know any [b
successful bitcoiners[/b] who daytrade.

daytrading works on high volatility days when crashes and corrections occur. If the price is making 15%+ swings, this will give you enough room to pay your commissions and have a margin of error to make mistakes and still profit.

How much did you make daytrading (y-t-d), and how much could you have made doing something else?  Roll Eyes
I made 5btc just now on that correction.


What platform do you trade?



39. Post 3626793 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: InwardContour on November 18, 2013, 06:46:04 PM
all indicators show true overbought >90 (rsi, stoch, stochrsi, money flow index), bollinger band deviation huge.... this is scary

lol...



40. Post 3627239 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Cheesle on November 18, 2013, 07:21:56 PM
So is there a live-video-stream or just audio for the hearing today? It is starting in like 40 minutes?
Anyone got the link?
For how long is it scheduled?

http://www.c-span.org/Live-Video/C-SPAN3/



41. Post 3627545 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 18, 2013, 07:42:39 PM
LTC is the most elaborate pump and dump scheme ever. Goes up 125% for no reason

Yes the pump started late last night PST time. The guy was buying out his own walls - then the tards on BTCe troll-box flames the fire.



42. Post 3627966 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Cad Virtex is down...



43. Post 3647466 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 20, 2013, 04:37:22 AM
this is what we call "VOLUME" guys!!!!



chinese volume infected the rest!!!



44. Post 3647546 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

So I wonder what our new friends who just heard about BTC are going to think of "funny numbers" on one of the largest exchanges when they google BTC in the next week or so...



45. Post 3647550 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Einewton on November 20, 2013, 04:48:00 AM
http://www.bitlisten.com/


CHRISTMAS IS COMING BITCHES



46. Post 3647800 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: kromer on November 20, 2013, 05:20:13 AM
With all these sells there's gonna be a lot of money sitting on the exchanges. I'm think we will bounce back fast at some point.

some of that money (provided not goxbux) will go to a new home off the exchanges I fear...



47. Post 3647809 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 20, 2013, 05:22:25 AM
you can say whatever you want about him but RealSolid is genius for all other exchange operators.

Forgive my ignorance, who is RealSolid?

MCXNow owner

Cool, thank you-- nice site. And, historically, he wrote exchange software for BTC, or was part of Gox, or ...?

It's probably a scam, actually.

+1



48. Post 3648085 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on November 20, 2013, 05:59:01 AM
Not sure why people are pretending Gox doesnt matter? I guess most of you are watching your $ value take a huge drop?

Gox volume is 100% real. China is not.

A 10k sell is nothing to scoff at.

That and the 1500 wall @ 535... People understand the network is still young. This will DEFINITELY deter new money, which lets face it, is why BTC increase in value in the first place...



49. Post 3648222 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: bobdude17 on November 20, 2013, 06:17:33 AM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1r1gu5/starbucks_to_make_announcement_regarding_bitcoin/

"Leaker" says Starbucks to accept bitcoin by Thanksgiving.

In the middle of setting up a bitcoin bet involving SeansOutpost for escrow. Off the wall claim just got a little interesting...

What I want to know is if you are such a person to get a hold of this information. WHY SHARE IT?! Why drive the price up on yourself right now?



50. Post 3648264 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: tHash on November 20, 2013, 06:18:16 AM
Not sure why people are pretending Gox doesnt matter? I guess most of you are watching your $ value take a huge drop?

Gox volume is 100% real. China is not.

A 10k sell is nothing to scoff at.

That and the 1500 wall @ 535... People understand the network is still young. This will DEFINITELY deter new money, which lets face it, is why BTC increase in value in the first place...


Who cares about a 10k sell?   One less person with 10k to sell in the future . . .   And that 1.5k wall, you think that is anything?   Did you see the previous 1.5k get munched just after the big sell?   Took less than 5 minutes.   I suppose Stamp having 3 mil more in bids than a few days ago is new money running away . . .   Have you seen how many people in just this forum are screaming about not being able to get money in fast enough?   If I had the coins, I would manipulate this as much as I could too, this is a last stop at these price levels.

You are missing the point here though. Look @ this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=316297.0 and see how many people ACTUALLY have that many BTC under their control? Then ask yourself. Why would you sell that much wealth? Also, that may have been a little bit of a dumber whale who does not have the discipline to scale out and sell into buying pressure (see action after ATH). Personally, those with the most to lose, usually have the best access to resources that aid their decision making - when they act, I listen, its worked well thus far.

Also, with regards to your mention about Stamp having 3mil more in bids than a few days ago is irrelevant since I am talking about what happens AFTER this moment, not the hype that led to the people making those deposits last week...



51. Post 3648393 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: tHash on November 20, 2013, 06:42:47 AM
Not sure why people are pretending Gox doesnt matter? I guess most of you are watching your $ value take a huge drop?

Gox volume is 100% real. China is not.

A 10k sell is nothing to scoff at.

why is China volume not real?

no trade fee

ahhhhh ok

There is real volume in China.   The daily trade volume is higher than there would be if there were fees, no doubt.   It is impossible to know how much effect it has overall.   The "fake volume" crowd is just grasping at straws to try and talk the price down.   I hope they keep doing it, we need people to temper the market with FUD or exuberance would run away even worse.  

tl;dr   It would be really stupid to assume there is no demand for BTC in China . . .

How do you jump from the idea that China's prices are artificially inflated due to no the lack trading fees to saying those people whome think that, think there is no demand for BTC in China?



52. Post 3648494 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: octaft on November 20, 2013, 06:52:24 AM

It's still trading at these prices, though. They volume may be "fake", but not the price.


I'm not saying the volume is faked, because I really have no idea, but couldn't a big player use the lack of trading fees to their advantage by setting up big sell walls, buying them out, and creating the illusion of incredible buying pressure at no cost? Or vice versa, I suppose.

Someone gets it!



53. Post 3648532 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Can I also add to the conversation that fact that one of the most popular (and profitable) btc gambling sites went down MOMENTS into the first big crash from 900 levels on gox? I refer to primedice.

Some suspect he absconded with the funds and sold when he could https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=208986.2140 (I know some may think of the commenter as a troll, but there is often truth hidden within the "spam" of some people).  If that and the fact that some very established members have sold the majority of their holdings tells you nothing about what is will happen within the next little while... Well you are on your own.



54. Post 3648607 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: tHash on November 20, 2013, 07:11:47 AM

It's still trading at these prices, though. They volume may be "fake", but not the price.


I'm not saying the volume is faked, because I really have no idea, but couldn't a big player use the lack of trading fees to their advantage by setting up big sell walls, buying them out, and creating the illusion of incredible buying pressure at no cost? Or vice versa, I suppose.

Someone gets it!

So, while the manipulators were hard at work at Gox, why did they not paint red tape in China, creating the illusion of incredible selling pressure?   That would have helped drop the price quite a bit more.   It could be done, but how much is it actually done?   All we can do is speculate, and speculation by very nature is wrong at least as much as it is right.

This last sell off was not market manipulation nor was it intended to drive prices down to buy the dip... It was stated earlier that the gox errors were due to a fail-safe put in place to protect against large dumps. What this last day or two represents is an actual transfer of major btc holdings to fiat as large holders sold into the demand built up over the last week.

Let me put it this way. In a market in which holding is more profitable than shorting, driving price up significantly requires actual people buying into the market, which means it requires a lot of capital $$. Driving price down however, requires dumping a "few" (what were once very cheap and plentiful) coins into the market.

Ask yourselves, how can it be that BTC increases in value? It is none other than more people ($$) entering the system.




55. Post 3648666 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: BitThink on November 20, 2013, 07:27:58 AM
Can I also add to the conversation that fact that one of the most popular (and profitable) btc gambling sites went down MOMENTS into the first big crash from 900 levels on gox? I refer to primedice.

Some suspect he absconded with the funds and sold when he could https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=208986.2140 (I know some may think of the commenter as a troll, but there is often truth hidden within the "spam" of some people).  If that and the fact that some very established members have sold the majority of their holdings tells you nothing about what is will happen within the next little while... Well you are on your own.

You have emphasized that this is just for the 'next little while', so most people will not care so much. Yes, it may crash to $300, but it was the price just 3 days ago. What's the big deal?

If you want to sell now and buy back low enough, You have to watch the market 24/7 because no one could know when it will suddenly shoot up again.

Perhaps I misrepresented my former statement when I said " within the next little while," since a while in BTC terms now goes to mean hours lol Smiley. But seriously, the events of this weekend will carry into the weeks ahead as the major catalyst for the BTC price (new-money) stagnates and reflects on the opportunity before them.



56. Post 3648677 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: BitThink on November 20, 2013, 07:34:37 AM

It's still trading at these prices, though. They volume may be "fake", but not the price.


I'm not saying the volume is faked, because I really have no idea, but couldn't a big player use the lack of trading fees to their advantage by setting up big sell walls, buying them out, and creating the illusion of incredible buying pressure at no cost? Or vice versa, I suppose.

Someone gets it!

So, while the manipulators were hard at work at Gox, why did they not paint red tape in China, creating the illusion of incredible selling pressure?   That would have helped drop the price quite a bit more.   It could be done, but how much is it actually done?   All we can do is speculate, and speculation by very nature is wrong at least as much as it is right.

This last sell off was not market manipulation nor was it intended to drive prices down to buy the dip... It was stated earlier that the gox errors were due to a fail-safe put in place to protect against large dumps. What this last day or two represents is an actual transfer of major btc holdings to fiat as large holders sold into the demand built up over the last week.

Let me put it this way. In a market in which holding is more profitable than shorting, driving price up significantly requires actual people buying into the market, which means it requires a lot of capital $$. Driving price down however, requires dumping a "few" (what were once very cheap and plentiful) coins into the market.

Ask yourselves, how can it be that BTC increases in value? It is none other than more people ($$) entering the system.



For BTC prices to increases further, a lot of early adopters (holding with 2 digits cost BTCs) have to sell out their holdings. If they don't sell now, they will sell at $1000, $2000, ... eventually. Therefore, dumping actually means coins exchanged from people buying them at low price to those buying them high. Then the average cost of coins increases significantly, and that means we can expect stable increase to next height.

What?

*edit* Read this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=323988.0;all



57. Post 3648736 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: tHash on November 20, 2013, 07:44:41 AM

It's still trading at these prices, though. They volume may be "fake", but not the price.


I'm not saying the volume is faked, because I really have no idea, but couldn't a big player use the lack of trading fees to their advantage by setting up big sell walls, buying them out, and creating the illusion of incredible buying pressure at no cost? Or vice versa, I suppose.

Someone gets it!

So, while the manipulators were hard at work at Gox, why did they not paint red tape in China, creating the illusion of incredible selling pressure?   That would have helped drop the price quite a bit more.   It could be done, but how much is it actually done?   All we can do is speculate, and speculation by very nature is wrong at least as much as it is right.

This last sell off was not market manipulation nor was it intended to drive prices down to buy the dip... It was stated earlier that the gox errors were due to a fail-safe put in place to protect against large dumps. What this last day or two represents is an actual transfer of major btc holdings to fiat as large holders sold into the demand built up over the last week.

Let me put it this way. In a market in which holding is more profitable than shorting, driving price up significantly requires actual people buying into the market, which means it requires a lot of capital $$. Driving price down however, requires dumping a "few" (what were once very cheap and plentiful) coins into the market.

Ask yourselves, how can it be that BTC increases in value? It is none other than more people ($$) entering the system.



For BTC prices to increases further, a lot of early adopters (holding with 2 digits cost BTCs) have to sell out their holdings. If they don't sell now, they will sell at $1000, $2000, ... eventually. Therefore, dumping actually means coins exchanged from people buying them at low price to those buying them high. Then the average cost of coins increases significantly, and that means we can expect stable increase to next height.

What?

It makes perfect sense.   Coins that could have been acquired for much less, who knows maybe even pre 2013 prices, are sold for a handsome profit.   Those coins now have a burden at the new purchase price.   They are no longer $10 coins, they are $500 coins.  

Right... And as soon as those people who bought the coin for 500-1000-10000 whatever don't get 501-1001-10001 in return after X time then what happens? You see again, the market system needs new $$ to operate.



58. Post 3648806 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: BitThink on November 20, 2013, 07:57:33 AM

It's still trading at these prices, though. They volume may be "fake", but not the price.


I'm not saying the volume is faked, because I really have no idea, but couldn't a big player use the lack of trading fees to their advantage by setting up big sell walls, buying them out, and creating the illusion of incredible buying pressure at no cost? Or vice versa, I suppose.

Someone gets it!

So, while the manipulators were hard at work at Gox, why did they not paint red tape in China, creating the illusion of incredible selling pressure?   That would have helped drop the price quite a bit more.   It could be done, but how much is it actually done?   All we can do is speculate, and speculation by very nature is wrong at least as much as it is right.

This last sell off was not market manipulation nor was it intended to drive prices down to buy the dip... It was stated earlier that the gox errors were due to a fail-safe put in place to protect against large dumps. What this last day or two represents is an actual transfer of major btc holdings to fiat as large holders sold into the demand built up over the last week.

Let me put it this way. In a market in which holding is more profitable than shorting, driving price up significantly requires actual people buying into the market, which means it requires a lot of capital $$. Driving price down however, requires dumping a "few" (what were once very cheap and plentiful) coins into the market.

Ask yourselves, how can it be that BTC increases in value? It is none other than more people ($$) entering the system.



For BTC prices to increases further, a lot of early adopters (holding with 2 digits cost BTCs) have to sell out their holdings. If they don't sell now, they will sell at $1000, $2000, ... eventually. Therefore, dumping actually means coins exchanged from people buying them at low price to those buying them high. Then the average cost of coins increases significantly, and that means we can expect stable increase to next height.

What?

It makes perfect sense.   Coins that could have been acquired for much less, who knows maybe even pre 2013 prices, are sold for a handsome profit.   Those coins now have a burden at the new purchase price.   They are no longer $10 coins, they are $500 coins.   

Right... And as soon as those people who bought the coin for 500-1000-10000 whatever don't get 501-1001-10001 in return after X time then what happens? You see again, the system needs new $$ to operate.
Yes, you are right. So the key is whether you are bullish or bearish in the long term, or in other words whether you believe BTC will finally go to mainstream (means much more $$ than now). If you believe in that, then all these up and downs do not matter so much and we know that all these big dumps along the way are inevitable. They are only meaningful to traders.

For trading, since BTC market is 24/7, it is better to rely on bot softwares. Otherwise, it's not worth sacrificing our life on it.

Agreed  Cheesy



59. Post 3648890 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: tHash on November 20, 2013, 08:02:17 AM

Right... And as soon as those people who bought the coin for 500-1000-10000 whatever don't get 501-1001-10001 in return after X time then what happens? You see again, the system needs new $$ to operate.

Yes, and the amount of interest drummed up in the last few days has assured that many people are trying to get money in.   They may wait to see where we land, but everyone knows we will be back up to $900+ eventually.   It would be awesome to consolidate for a few weeks, but I doubt we will be so lucky.   You are new, listen to the likes of Nemesis.  Not Blitz, he is not so bright with his "2011 all over" talk.   Everything is crazy bullish right now.   This is the best buying opportunity we will have for quite a while.   Watch closely if you are waiting for a bottom, they happen fast and are gone.   It may take a few days to sort this correction out, but it will be history soon enough.   If I had any more fiat handy, I would be getting it ready to spend, alas I spent the last little bit I had at $180 after the crash from $233.   At least I still have some $2 coins  Grin   Seriously though, be careful, what you want is more BTC, not more fiat.   Don't miss the boat because you are too bearish.

It is late and my apologies if I sound over-all bearish - I am but momentarily a bear. Crypto currencies are the future of commerce, that is clear, for many technical reasons. The question I wrestle with is will it be BTC in which the value of that technology will be stored?



60. Post 3649023 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: DaRude on November 20, 2013, 08:30:05 AM

Yes, I agree. In my opinion, this kind of dump could be explained by one of the follows
1) failed manipulation
2) desperate for cash in urgent (doubt it due to the withdraw problem there)
3) insider trading (I don't know which news can dramatically crash BTC market now)
4) stolen BTCs (I heard Gox needs identification?)
5) arbitrage (are there some big buys that time in other exchanges?)
6) ... just crazy. Smiley

Any more explanations?

7) Someone who missed a chance to sell at a profit after the April correction, and thinks it is happening again and panics.
8 ) Manipulation that didn't fail, causes doubt about the market, follows up with more dumps, waits for full on panic.


1-Yepppp
2-Desperate for 5MM? Happens to be at the time when most banks around the world are closed? Extremely unlikely
3-Possibility, but it's already been few hours after the market sell and no news, so he could've at least spread it over few hours. But a day or two should show for sure
4-Yeah, but again why dump all at once like that at odd hours coincidence?
5-No way to move such amount across exchanges, and highly doubtful that he had the same amount at other exchanges to cover. And arb been there for some time no reason to do a market sell
6-always an option, but how many crazy multi millionaires do you know who throw money out like that
7-Timing just makes this too unlikely.
8-True, but if i tried to pull this off i'd be betting on instantaneous panic, plus that wall BTC1.5k wall was a BTC1.7k wall at $533 and got moved back once people started to go at it. Smells like intimidation tactic.

9-FBI cashing in on those confiscated SR coins? 10k down 40k to go?


OooOoo - #9 tickles me because I remember someone QUICKLY moving off that topic with a joke when asked "What do you think they intend to do with those funds?" during Monday's hearing... This is a fun conspiracy!



61. Post 3654569 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

2k dump @ 600 and 600 dump @ 220. Man the battle stations! Plug-the leaks!

You guys go ahead, I am off to the Winchester to spend my profits!



62. Post 3654610 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Wekkel on November 20, 2013, 07:16:41 PM
Unbelievable that people are still buying. Just let it slip and pick it up later on the cheap.

+1



63. Post 3654643 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 20, 2013, 07:18:09 PM
Unbelievable that people are still buying. Just let it slip and pick it up later on the cheap.

i think you underestimate the amount of money looking for bitcoins.


You are right, the amount of people LOOKING for btc is high. But people BUYING atm is a different story. All new investors waiting for the waves to settle before swimming.



64. Post 3714087 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

I bet you this last buyback was Prime Dice getting back in finally https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=208986.2260   Cheesy

It is a conspiracy of course, but it is a happy time!

Would be too funny, to see PD up within hours of that trade



65. Post 3854412 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

This is the shake-out... Just wait until the BTC conference in Vegas next Tues-Wed. I do not believe we are going to go much lower than 700 (CAD VIRTEX) on this panic selling of China news. Although, I do not expect over 1k again until January.

I am just throwing this all out of my ass btw - wishful thinking.



66. Post 3854812 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: mmitech on December 06, 2013, 07:51:29 PM
guys this is really fishy... I see massive buys on other exchanges!!! do you think this was all played ? create some panic people start selling and some big hands eats the weak hands ?

BTC Vegas Conference buy-in Wink



67. Post 3855279 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: DougTanner on December 06, 2013, 08:16:11 PM
getting damned cloud flare unavailable just as it finally gave me the option to cancel a sell on cavirtex.. STOP FUCKING WITH ME..

and thanks sell order cancelled. lets just hope that 700 is good enough for a panic when gox comes back on cavirtex.

I managed to wipe out the order book down to $749, hopefully I haven't made 'a huge mistake'.

I gotta admit it was intensely satisfying though.

I think you actually sold to my bids at the 750 mark. Just managed to put em in 15 minutes ago as this was all happening. It is nice to put a name to the transaction Smiley



68. Post 3856443 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Guys... I have been reading all this back and forth for months and all I can say is this:

Bitcoin is a VOLATILE beast. There are aspects to it which scream manipulation (gox loops / BTC-e hack back etc.). Although, name me one global market that does not have some form of manipulation.

Bitcoin is also a dynamic technical innovation, and with it brings disruption to existing systems. This means it will take time for it to establish a "utilitarian" price -whatever it may be. And as the network grows, so will BTC's inherent utility.

In the meantime, can we just accept that no matter how much research we have done, or how much faith we have, BTC is a calculated risk (aka an investment). Treat it as such. If you want to day-trade go to FX. If you want to sell your home and put it all into BTC, go to Vegas and put it all on black you will at least save yourself the stress of watching the markets ping-pong.






69. Post 3858394 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: kwest on December 07, 2013, 12:47:03 AM
I've put in buy orders all the way down to $200.. bigger the lower we go.
Still holding on to my initial BTC investment, sold off the ones I made trading. Definitely feels like the right decision. If we go up again already, I'm cashing that money out for good. If we go down deep, I'm buying more BTC with them. Either way.. they're staying on stamp for the weekend. Possibly longer.

Your logic confuses me. You set up bids to catch the price if it falls (you have faith that BTC will be worth more in the future)

Yet, you say if it goes up you are going to sell all that (you have no faith that BTC will be worth more in the future and just want to get off the ride).

Are you assuming that the next quick rise will be a bull trap or am I missing something?



70. Post 3859642 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: Sitarow on December 07, 2013, 02:45:54 AM
Seems cavirtex.com new trading platform is broken.

Perhaps a sad attempt at high volume trading.....

I suppose this is "the" way to scare off traders.


+1



71. Post 3861951 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: pera on December 07, 2013, 07:53:18 AM
where the fuck is the bottom?


At this point, the market is on TILT.



72. Post 3884761 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: byronbb on December 09, 2013, 01:10:09 AM
Futures have collapsed, dealing only +120 above spot when it had been dealt like +800 at the top.

I am not as familiar with futures market analysis. Can you expand on what this means?



73. Post 3884914 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: byronbb on December 09, 2013, 01:35:19 AM
Futures have collapsed, dealing only +120 above spot when it had been dealt like +800 at the top.

I am not as familiar with futures market analysis. Can you expand on what this means?

Check out:  https://icbit.se/WebTrade/Trading.aspx?s=BUH4

That's the march contract, highest volume contract on the site. The spread between Gox Price and March contract has been of interest to me. Currently trading "only" $120 over current gox price, when it had been trading as high as $2000, when gox was ~$1200, ie an $800 difference.


Icbit.se FAQ: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=164255.0

I appreciate the insight, thank you.



74. Post 3923130 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: babeq on December 11, 2013, 05:32:54 PM
I just back from work and seeing that bitcoin fell about 100$ today, could anyone tell me what caused that? Any bank banned bitcoin?

Sheep got fleeced on Friday manip, sold low. Panic bought over fair value. IF we do go down, it will be minimal.

Also, I am just at the BTC convention in Vegas - it is good news all around here and will be released within a day or two. The community behind BTC is amazing to say the least.

All you guys with your fancy pictures predicting a move down... 1 BTC says you are mainly in FIAT atm.



75. Post 3923379 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: capsqrl on December 11, 2013, 05:50:26 PM
with your fancy pictures predicting a move down... 1 BTC says you are mainly in FIAT atm.

And 1 USD says you are mainly in bitcoin atm - so what? Nobody here says what they really think, only what their position is, you as well.

You are correct assuming that I am mostly in BTC - but I always keep fiat to buy the manip-dips. Also, at the point at which I bought in, we could go to $400 and I would be happy as a clam.



76. Post 3923741 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: MAbtc on December 11, 2013, 06:26:14 PM
"Easily misinterpreted" characterises this whole "crash". The China news was easily misinterpreted as China outlawing Bitcoin completely, and the 10-year-old JPM patent, completely unrelated to anything Bitcoin does, is being easily misinterpeted on purpose by maxkeiser as JPM preparing to sue all Bitcoin exchanges. Bitcoin holders are the most jumpy creatures ever.
Monument to the "news doesn't matter" argument. Sentiment is king.

Sentiment is the Queen. Utility is the King.

For the past little while though, the King has been taking a nap and the Queen is running the show.



77. Post 3923775 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: BRADLEYPLOOF on December 11, 2013, 06:29:04 PM
200 coin dump , why not sell slowly to ..not jip yourself of ..10-20 bucks a coin.. guess you'd rather just try and manipulate

Might have had to do with a 217 BTC buy of a lambo?  

lol no... It is probably a fractional portion of a whale selling off that got in at a good price on Friday.

The cycle is quite simple. Manipulate, buy low, and sell off in increments into buying pressure at predetermined profit levels. Once out of "sell-able" coins, wait for bull sentiment to weaken and then rinse and repeat.



78. Post 3934441 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Uhm, not sure if this has been mentioned before but what happened at 15:00 on CA virtex?




79. Post 3984740 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: kurious on December 16, 2013, 12:12:32 AM
Cryptsy is imploding.

I've taken my coins out and would suggest the same to anyone.

Based on what?

Er... it's actually down right now:  Error 502

Edit - back up - but it has been weird at losing trades and having balance problems lately - not sure it's 'imploding' just yet - what happened?

I spoke with BigVern at the BTC conference in Vegas. They are planning to upgrade their API in the near future, I would not worry about these small down-times.



80. Post 4022434 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: magicmexican on December 18, 2013, 09:13:59 AM
Its kinda disgusting to think how much money one made just by having a bits of inside info.

Welcome to all financial markets... The key is to learn to play along side the big-boys and get out of their way when necessary.



81. Post 4024769 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

http://www.scmp.com/business/banking-finance/article/1384688/bitcoin-price-slump-after-beijing-bans-clearing-services

China is out of the game for a good while. I usually don't agree with the magic drawings guys, but this time I fear there is more room on the downside than we have seen.

Ask yourselves this, what is the path of least resistance within the next week?



82. Post 4024996 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 18, 2013, 12:51:03 PM
I take comfort in the fact that as bad I'm doing. Thank god I'm not margin trading!

How come?? What happened?

There was so much swinging up and down, you almost couldn't go wrong if you patiently set a counter order and wait..

Fucked myself royally with some stupidity. Bought back at the wrong number. Didn't double check my order before I confirmed it. Drinking coffee. Always my arch nemesis.

Now I actually have to root for it to go down. :-( That said, I still don't think any of us know what the Christmas holidays are going to be like. Maybe this will get worse. I *gulp* certainly hope so.

Anyway, I should have known better. In positive news, I got my first prototype of a new sort of Physical bitcoin that will save me from myself in the future, and potentially many others. I'll have details when it gets closer to production time. :-)



If you're in US, you cant sell physical coins now Sad. Thanks to fucking FINCEN.


That's the brilliance of it. Although I'm American, I have a business in the Czech Republic. And even more brilliant, this device legally gets around the FinCEN rules, meaning I won't have any problem selling it even if I were in America.

I'm hoping that because it's a product I myself need- that others will find it useful too.

What do you mean by this "device." I do not mean to sound cynical, but have you actually read the FinCEN ruling on the matter? I mean the actual documentation?



83. Post 4025040 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 18, 2013, 12:57:01 PM
I take comfort in the fact that as bad I'm doing. Thank god I'm not margin trading!

How come?? What happened?

There was so much swinging up and down, you almost couldn't go wrong if you patiently set a counter order and wait..

Fucked myself royally with some stupidity. Bought back at the wrong number. Didn't double check my order before I confirmed it. Drinking coffee. Always my arch nemesis.

Now I actually have to root for it to go down. :-( That said, I still don't think any of us know what the Christmas holidays are going to be like. Maybe this will get worse. I *gulp* certainly hope so.

Anyway, I should have known better. In positive news, I got my first prototype of a new sort of Physical bitcoin that will save me from myself in the future, and potentially many others. I'll have details when it gets closer to production time. :-)



If you're in US, you cant sell physical coins now Sad. Thanks to fucking FINCEN.


That's the brilliance of it. Although I'm American, I have a business in the Czech Republic. And even more brilliant, this device legally gets around the FinCEN rules, meaning I won't have any problem selling it even if I were in America.

I'm hoping that because it's a product I myself need- that others will find it useful too.

What do you mean by this "device." I do not mean to sound cynical, but ahve you actually read teh FinCEN ruling on the matter? I mean the actual documentation?

I can't divulge more at this point, but suffice it to say- yes I do believe I've gotten around it.

For the sake of the community, I hope you are right. However, if you are treading any kind of grey area with your methodology, it is more risk than it is worth imo. Then again, what is not in a grey area right now...



84. Post 4031854 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

BTCE & Litecoinpool.org down

Also, if you eve wanted to see a robo in action, look at Gox depth charts

http://imgur.com/4Nh96ia



85. Post 4031931 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Ivanhoe on December 18, 2013, 09:53:11 PM
Will the majority of the sellers buy back in after it's clear the bottom has been hit? That's the real question here.

"It's clear the bottom has been hit" - Ya for the next day or two...



86. Post 4053672 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: Voodah on December 20, 2013, 06:33:30 AM
Are we really going up?

Maybe right now is the best time to sell for a few days...

Or should I buy some more...

I'm completely disoriented right now..

To be honest, I am seeing a constant sell pressure into the new wave of buyers. Imo, it is the whales who loaded low, taking profits the only way a large position ever can...

What I am looking for, is the direction the market goes once they are done meeting their targets...



87. Post 4063458 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: MAbtc on December 20, 2013, 08:37:37 PM
What happens when china wakes up in a crash?

If there is a crash. That attempt to create panic seems to have fizzled

Doubt this is attempt to create panic, rather the opposite. Whale(s) dumping over time.

I don't think you're reading the situation right.

It's only the chinese and regular folks prone to panic who are dumping.

The real whales are accumulating at these prices.

Don't take my word for it. Go back a few pages and carefully read Loaded's posts. They are quite telling (and bullish).....
At these prices?

When Loaded posted last, and BTCChina rallied, they were nearing $300.

+1



88. Post 4063583 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: justusranvier on December 20, 2013, 08:55:39 PM
Have you heard of turtle trading? Simplest trading system-- I think it goes, if up 20 days (or whatever in BTC), then buy, if 20 down, sell. Has very good followers and record. Funny.
So... buy high, sell low?

Seriously, this type of system does not work with BTC time-frame. All the strategy really is, is glorified trend position trading. In btc, that would have blew your account faster than you can imagine.



89. Post 4063662 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: Voodah on December 20, 2013, 08:56:44 PM
It's only the chinese and regular folks prone to panic who are dumping.

The real whales are accumulating at these prices.

Don't take my word for it. Go back a few pages and carefully read Loaded's posts. They are quite telling (and bullish).....

I speculate he's one of the whales who are dumping right now, in order to buy back lower, because it just makes sense.
I mean hey guys I know you all need a hero figure but he is a portfolio manager! Making money for his customers is his job.
I speculate that he dumped close enough to the top and he cashed out fiat. Then he flew to China with bags of cash, and he gave them directly to Bobby Lee in order to deposit them on his BTCChina account. The he slowly bought coins, causing the price rise in BTCChina.
And now he is closing the circle and dumping again, for a second final round of this "squeeze-a-nob" game.

Yes, that's all certainly possible.

My only point is that if real big whales are accumulating (either at 300 or 500), it's because they know they will soon have ROI.  They know the accumulation game is coming to an end.

2014 will make the $1240 top a joke.

Listen, I read loaded's posts. You guys have to understand that if he really was carrying bags of cash, he would not have been able to set foot on Chinese soil... Do any of you live in the real world? If he has off-shore entities and his cash that is a wire away, that is slightly different. Still though, there is no reason for him to go there to put money back into the Chinese exchange. Government trumps Bobby ability to find a willing third party payment system.

He went there to talk about what is next, and how can he move his wealth accordingly. Buying back in on a exchange chocked by government, I don't think so.



90. Post 4065457 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: granathus on December 20, 2013, 10:13:00 PM
Listen, I read loaded's posts. You guys have to understand that if he really was carrying bags of cash, he would not have been able to set foot on Chinese soil.

What makes you think getting money into China is hard? That is what China does. They run huge trade surpluses. Just with the US it's like 300 B USD every year.

Invoice manipulation is a huge way to get USD in.

You guys are missing the point and extrapolating into something I spoke nothing of... I stated that Loaded himself would not be able to move the amounts required with him under the pretenses assumed from his posts.

I never stated that certain financial structures would not allow you to move capital in sizable amounts into and out of China.



91. Post 4095893 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Don't know if this has already been posted, but here is BTC China statment from Bobby: https://vip.btcchina.com/page/notice20131220

Reading between the lines speaks volumes here...



92. Post 4133811 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.46h):

LTC!!!!  Shocked



93. Post 4161664 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

Let me throw this out there... This is based off of the actions of the major players who absorbed the fall during the last decline and bought at 450-550 range.

First, what is the unwritten golden rule of large stake investing? Double up, sell half, recoup original investment, let it ride, sell off in stages into buying pressure. Unwelcome news aside, this is exactly what I have been witnessing. We rise 20$ on X volume, and fall 10$ on XXX volume in the last few days. We just hit 800, which is fairly close to the 2X mark for those who got in on the last bottom. This means a large volume sell-off into what hopefully is sufficient buy pressure is happening right now - hence the triple nipple or whatever the hell you technical guys call it.

From here, the major market driver is the money sitting on the side-lines that was made during the last run-up in price for those who sold above 750-950. This money has been cautiously buying in over the last little while, and now that the selling pressure from the double up crowd is at it's peak, the market is left in the hands of the speculators.

Honestly, up or down is anyone's guess at this point. I would say it is A, but then someone will say B. We just have to place our bets and let the horses run in the short term.

Now please, feel free to dissect my comment at length and cut me up. After-all, what the hell do we know? No one with any real knowledge of the players involved would help others make the "right" decision if it will cost them more than a dime - humans just don't work that way MOST OF THE TIME. Pretty much each comment here can be read between the lines as - this is my position currently in the market and here are the reasons why I hope it is the right one.

I am all for the Asian spirit - LET US GAMBLE




94. Post 4161691 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

Quote from: aminorex on December 27, 2013, 01:46:26 AM
Does anyone else think this rise is lacking significant volume?
Ever since 18 November, the only time that there is above average volume is when it is selling off.  All the buying is being done by stealth, one coin at a time.

Or through back-room deals off-exchange...



95. Post 4162095 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

Coming from a seasoned Forex trader and once a firm devotee of technical analysis - it helps you understand what has happened, it does not tell you what will... Can it give you an IDEA of what may happen? Sure, but only if the underlying circumstances are the same as they were the last time the analysis was conducted, which in the dynamic reality is hardly ever.



96. Post 4164963 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

Off to the races...



97. Post 4165196 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

Quote from: windjc on December 27, 2013, 08:17:14 AM
Right now the market wants to go up. Just deal with it. ATHs are much more likely before <380.

How much more likely? Smiley

53.7%

NO YOU ARE WRONG - %53.6  Angry Angry Angry



98. Post 4165292 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

Quote from: gandhibt on December 27, 2013, 08:23:13 AM
Right now the market wants to go up. Just deal with it. ATHs are much more likely before <380.

How much more likely? Smiley

53.7%

NO YOU ARE WRONG - %53.6  Angry Angry Angry

does that mean 50% * 1.536 = 76.8% ?

Wink



99. Post 4165611 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

China is back to their old game...



100. Post 4277543 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.50h):

Richard Branson is an odd monicker to go by...



101. Post 4298884 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.50h):

Quote from: windjc on January 04, 2014, 02:34:33 AM
I swear, I have extremists on both sides of me.

Welcome to the wonderful world of bitcoin - where the players are bi-polar and the markets run on E



102. Post 5084949 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Wow, I have been following this thread for a while now, I think I am going to stop. Seriously, for every one legitimate remark, there are hundreds others that do nothing but obfuscate reality and regurgitate media frenzy.

This thread now resembles the cesspools that are the Baby-Pips or ForexFactory forums in the way disinformation is spread based of half-truths and delivered with so much emotional baggage, you'd think the authors are packing for a trip to Mars (or the Moon right?).

Anyways, I digress - enjoy the feces flinging, if you are into that kind of thing.




103. Post 5225667 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 18, 2014, 09:50:24 PM
The Chinese Slumber Method Prediction almost worked this time!!!

Checking the prediction for Huobi

Prediction posted: Tuesday 2014-02-18, 01:14 UTC
Prediction valid for: Tuesday 2014-02-18, 19:00--19:59 UTC (not before, not after)
Huobi's predicted price:  3860 -- 3920 CNY (3890 plus or minus 30)
Huobi's actual price (L -- H): 3810 -- 3824 CNY (3817 plus or minus 7)
Error center-to-center: 73 CNY

The prediction is the rightmost blue rectangle in the chart below, just above the red/green price bars. 

The big dots on top of the price plot are the Slumber Points (prices at 19:00 UTC every day).  The True points (yellow) are those which had nearly zero trading volume at 19:00; the False ones (olive-brown) are those where Huobi's clients and/or their robots kept trading through the night.

The yellow line is the least-squares-fitted  trend line that was used to make the prediction.




Checking the prediction for Bitstamp

The Bitstamp predicition is the Huobi prediciton divided by 6.12

Bitstamp's predicted price: 625 -- 645 USD (635 plus or minus 10)
Bitstamp's actual price (L -- H):  617 -- 625 USD (621 plusor minus 4)
Error center-to-center: 14 USD

In the chart below, the dots are Huobi's Slumber Point prices divided by 6.12 (or 6.40  for feb 7--9)




I appreciate your combined use of regression analysis and volume analysis Smiley

Houbi's artificially inflated trading activity is well known by now, and I am glad to see someone using a creative fit of analytical tools to play of off this information. By combining the points of a linear regression trend line with the understanding that the best time to measure the underlying direction of Houbi is at points of low-activity, you have really created a good understanding of the general trend of the asset in that exchange.



104. Post 5229004 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

I appreciate the thoughtful response. Your analysis of Houbi's trading activity is spot on. Do you happen to be able to read/write mandarin?

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 19, 2014, 12:52:35 AM
I would not call it "artificially inflated".  Since they charge no fees, we should expect that they have many more actively trading clients than other exchanges, and also that each client generates a lot more trade volume than a client would elsewhere.

I have seen many claims that their volume is "fake", but I have yet to see evidence of that.  Their volume data seems to be consistent with humans assisted by robots or scripts. The model above exploits some features specific to Huobi that hopefully will let us get around that limitation.  First, Huobi seems to have little trade by unsupervised robots (which have much more varied behavior than humans, and therefore should be less predictable). Their clients apparently have relatively well-defined demographic profile, and are relatively isolated from the rest of the world in terms of economic news.   And, those clients are trading a single item (Bitcoin) and have a relatively narrow channel for injecting money into the system (local banks)

There is most definitely no validity behind "fake" volume coming out of those exchanges. Yet, the conditions on the exchange that you mention, computer assisted trading, tightly control fiat entry portals, and being isolated from global financial media all lead to blur the real utility (value) of the asset in question its' market participants. Computer assisted trading, especially in a no fee environment, has created a market in which true exchanges of wealth get distorted by a thick layer of mathematical models and relationships. Tight control of money into the system gives banks, and by extension the ruling political party, an effective bargaining chip when innovation and regulation collide, which we see happening all across the globe right now, not just in China. Finally, with the people's consumption of digital information filtered on a daily basis, only a handful of individuals know the reality of the market in which they operate in. So, "fake" volume at Houbi? No, not quite, but distorted, bureaucratically controlled, and fundamentally skewed? Yes, very much so.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 19, 2014, 12:52:35 AM
On the other hand, evidence fo fake volume at MtGOX and other sites are quite strong. For example, by the end of January MtGOX's volume was as low as 15 kBTC/day; some dumb robots, that worked steadily day and night, may have accounted for half of that.

It may not be a pleasant conclusion for non-Chinese bitcoiners, but it seems undeniable that bitcoin trading is now largely a Chinese thing; specifically, that the price of bitcoin is now largely determined by the Chinese traders at Huobi and OKCoin., and carried to other exchanges by arbitrage.

I do not even want to get into the issues with the other exchanges at the moment, for that is a whole other can of FUD/WORMS/DoGEs.

To me, the thought that BTC is growing to be largely a Chinese "thing" automatically raises concerns over future of innovation in the space and the underlying utility of the tech from a global perspective. Let's face it, China is not the world leader in open innovation policy.

Anyways, I digress - back to the real world I must



105. Post 5230800 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 19, 2014, 12:52:35 AM

I would consider legitimate (i.e. not "fake") any transaction between competing people or organizations, whether it is done manually or with the help of scripts and robots.  Any such transaction contributes to define the true "market price" of the item.   To a first approximation, it should not matter if the same coins are being traded back and forth many times, or how many distinct people are trading, as long as each transaction happens because both sides believe that the price is good.  To me a transaction is "fake" only if the buyer and seller are the same, or are colluding outside the market place.

Methinks that the volume of legitimate transactions is a good measure of the importance of a market.


Although I agree with your basic premise behind a legitimate transaction, I think that how many people trade the system and how many actual coins make-up the market hold important implications for true value approximation - first approximations are too general for me. This information becomes even more important if you really dissect the concept of a "fake" transaction.

Lax regulation, back-room deals for large holders, and a highly interconnected group of large stakeholders (listen to Andreas towards the middle of the talk when he speaks of how the various "good" actors reacted to the Mt. Gox press release http://letstalkbitcoin.com/e85-mtgox-and-malleability/#.UwQ8K4V_e_y) create a perfect breeding ground for acts like self-trading and collusion. Houbi is likely rife with less than legitimate transactions if we use the strict definition of "fake" as per your text. Unfortunately, since these forms of collusion often are hard to discern from volume and technical analysis even in good market conditions, an unlimited algo assisted trade environment does not make the task any easier. I know I kind of went on a rant there, but the point is to acknowledge the grey nature of the environment and see that certain technical metrics are less effective at understanding the reality of the stakeholders within this market.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 19, 2014, 12:52:35 AM

The higher the volume, the higher the liquidity and the smaller is the spread, therefore the price is pinned down more accurately.  At BTC-e, forexample, the price often is bouncing rapidly up and down by a few dollars, so that the 1-minute plot look like a broad belt.  You hardly see that at Huobi; the plot looks more like a line than a belt.

Usually, the higher the volume, the smaller is the effect on the price of buying or selling a fixed amount of coins.  Therefore, arbitrage trading between a high-volume market and a low-volume market generally has little effect on the price of the former, instead copies the price to the latter.  For example, I would guess that the sharp steps one can see in the 1-minute plots of BTC-China and Bitstamp (but not on Huobi's), at periods when there seems to be little real activity, are arbitrage transactions aligning their prices with the global market.

For all I have seen in the past 2-3 months, I believe that most of Huobi's volume is legitimate in this sense.  At the other exchanges, I am not so sure; but even if it is all legitimate, the volume at non-Chinese exchanges is only 1/3 to 1/4 of the volume at Huobi and OKCoin.   Whatever one may think of the "quality" or "meaningfulness" of their trade, it counts the same for the definition of BTC's price.


Ditto.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 19, 2014, 12:52:35 AM

Also I do not think that there is any government interference with the bitcoin trading inside the exchanges.  My understanding of the news is that the PBOC, having blocked the use of BTC as a currency in commerce, and prohibited banks from playing with it, now sees bitcoin trading within the exchanges as a kind of gambling, and therefore does not care about it at all.


Agreed, the government does not have direct influence inside the exchange per say, but they are still indirectly in control of how the future of trading bitcoin unfolds via regulation and other tools of submission.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 19, 2014, 12:52:35 AM

Note that I said "bitcoin trading", not "bitcoin".   Bitcoin development and other activities (such as promoting its commercial use) seem to be mostly "non-Chinese things".   Given the restrictions on use of BTC in China, I do not expect that there will be any significant development or advocacy there, except perhaps in mining technology.


True, I should have read that sentence more carefully - BTC trading is but a part (a very large one) of the entire system and are not the same thing.



106. Post 5295746 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: JCviggen on February 22, 2014, 08:41:27 AM
If it was easier to get fiat onto Gox you could make a killing now via bitcoinbuilder. Of course, the reason the difference is so big is precisely that it is difficult/slow to do for almost everybody.

Can someone tell me how exactly are they able to run this service?



107. Post 5295934 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: JCviggen on February 22, 2014, 08:51:12 AM
If it was easier to get fiat onto Gox you could make a killing now via bitcoinbuilder. Of course, the reason the difference is so big is precisely that it is difficult/slow to do for almost everybody.

Can someone tell me how exactly are they able to run this service?

Gox internal BTC transfers work. So if you want to sell your stuck Gox BTC you send them to the bitcoinbuilder Gox address. If you want to buy some, you send them real BTC to their regular BTC address. They are a middleman, getting a 2% fee... with 5-6k volume per day... it's a pretty profitable idea to say the least.

Interesting. Thank you for the info. Definitely a good idea from BB's shoes.



108. Post 5308442 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 22, 2014, 11:51:09 PM
Bad timing, FUDsters. Try again in a few hours. Man, the possibility of a short squeeze has got to be starting to worry you.

Short-squeeze or not short-squeeze, what is known for sure is that there is a lot FIAT sitting on Gox and hardly any coins after that liquidity wipe from 270-90. Meaning, even if just a tiny part of that captial was used to buy-back in, it will/is smear/smearing the charts with green. However, personally, that would be a great time to actually exchange your Goxcoin for FIAT, (the only truly confirmed withdrawal method from Gox atm.) because when Withdrawls in BTC do open, where do you think all those freshly bought GoxCoin via BitcoinBuilder will go? The answer is to the selling floor, but not on Gox...

Enjoy the ride folks!



109. Post 5377712 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: shmadz on February 26, 2014, 04:06:19 AM
Feels good to be only 100% BTC again. Being levered long was a little stressful.

I was feeling the same way.. most of my bids got filled, was going to just withdraw the coins to allocate to cold storage... and then this from virtex:


Quote
Withdraw Bitcoins

<< Back
Bitcoin Withdrawals are Temporarily Disabled

Please see our twitter feed for updates

Really Virtex? not you too?

Are fiat withdrawals still functioning?



110. Post 5377874 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

I hope that there won't be any new news coming out of Canada regarding regulation... They have never paused BTC withdraws before. This is the last update we got on the regulatory environment here up north http://www.coindesk.com/canadas-finance-minister-regulate-bitcoin/



111. Post 5390177 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: yrtrnc on February 26, 2014, 06:36:02 PM
I dont know if anyone of you got this, and I dont know if this is legit ( I didnt open the attachment yet)



Got it too. MTGox email db was compromised or something?

SCAM

Oh jesus, if this proves true... Prepare our anus



112. Post 5390357 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Miz4r on February 26, 2014, 06:44:15 PM
Ofcourse the usercount is going to become more stable in future, at some point the market is going to become saturated and the amount of new users getting into bitcoin each day will start to decrease until we reach a stable base. The usercount can't increase linearly or exponentially forever, I'm sure you would have to agree with that as well. So the increase in usercount will slow down as well as the amount of new coins and thus we are going to reach a state of equilibrium eventually. It's just a matter of time.

I don't see it like that.
The nature of bitcoin itself keeps any stability from forming when taking into account the price and the amount of users. The main thing (almost the only thing) that attracts people to bitcoin, are promises, that if they buy now, then they can sell later with a lot higher price. That creates this situation where stability is impossible because as soon as the situation becomes stable, then people won't get what they came for and they will start selling/leaving.
Bitcoin has to be either on a rise or dropping, there is no stable middle ground.
The fundamental flaw here is that a currency shouldn't be attractive as an speculative investment. It ruins the stability, and stability is the main quality of an good currency. A currency should be unattractive as an investment, so it will only be used to transfer wealth and not be considered as a source of wealth by itself.

Orly? Tell that to Forex traders who speculate in every single currency in the world.

Not that I disagree with you, but comparing BTC trading to the FX market is silly, even if as just a rebuttal to Miz4's last line.



113. Post 5390515 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: dreamspark on February 26, 2014, 06:54:23 PM
If people are getting them and never had a gox account could it be this account ? Who got that email to the email adresss registered here? Other one I can think of is bitcoinbuilder.

What?



114. Post 5394979 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

1600 Bid Wall @ 588 on stamp  Undecided



115. Post 5395109 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: simonk83 on February 26, 2014, 10:59:13 PM
1600 Bid Wall @ 588 on stamp  Undecided

Smiley

Personally, that wall is probably going to get pulled if tested. I think someone wants to push the market to 600. The other exchanges are struggling to break previous highs.



116. Post 5395189 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Can someone tell me why http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/bitstampUSD_depth.html shows no sign of the wall @ 593 but http://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/bitstamp/btcusd does?

*edit - it has been updated now. The wall @ 588 is now @ 593. It appears Bitcoincharts.com lags in their order-book delivery.



117. Post 5395219 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

I am going to stick my neck out there and say short now... This wall will be taken off soon.



118. Post 5395294 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

And the wall was not pulled but eaten!  Shocked



119. Post 5395344 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on February 26, 2014, 11:18:37 PM
And the wall was not pulled but eaten!  Shocked

Doesn't count as "eaten" if the buyer and seller are the same.  Wink Cheesy Cheesy

@ .2% comission that is still 1,600 dollars and for what?



120. Post 5395445 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on February 26, 2014, 11:23:35 PM
And the wall was not pulled but eaten!  Shocked

Doesn't count as "eaten" if the buyer and seller are the same.  Wink Cheesy Cheesy

@ .2% comission that is still 1,600 dollars and for what?

Planned volatility, which is often worth more.

If it is planned volatility, that that leads me to conclude the average joe is not a player here. Which translates to not enough powder to continue this rise. Therefore, I am inclined to stand behind my previous neck on the chopping block call to short.



121. Post 5396414 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

While we wait, some good stuff to listen to here. Really describes the landscape we face as digital currency proponents.

http://letstalkbitcoin.com/e87-the-captive-and-the-mountain/#.Uw6K-oV_e_w

32:00 "They are going after you, they are, they are investing everyone, they are on the bitcoin talk forums, they are on reddit, they are listening to this interview, they are on the IRC channel, they have huge budgets, there is a government task-force specifically for bit-coin. Follow the law, or work to change them, ignorance will not keep you out of jail."

Stay clean guys and do your taxes right!!



122. Post 5397182 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Dragonkiller on February 27, 2014, 01:36:15 AM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1z1mmz/breaking_full_mt_gox_story_coming/

same guy that provided the gox report and broke the fortress fund news

Are you on his mailing list? The link to get on it seems to be down. Those who know of this news before hand will have a huge advantage

http://eepurl.com/JgGy5



123. Post 5397350 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Dragonkiller on February 27, 2014, 01:53:29 AM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1z1mmz/breaking_full_mt_gox_story_coming/

same guy that provided the gox report and broke the fortress fund news

Are you on his mailing list? The link to get on it seems to be down. Those who know of this news before hand will have a huge advantage

http://eepurl.com/JgGy5

No I'm not. I don't really think it's going to move the markets, whatever he comes out with. In fact, he had previously suggested he thought other companies such as Blockchain, SecondMarket etc were involved in the cover-up. The fact that he is now saying Gox acted alone is a positive.

Well, I am not one to predict the future, but I think that the market will react aggressively if there is any hint of the coins still being around and not lost as per the previous document and current speculation. If this is the case, that only means one thing for market prices.

Regardless of what comes out though, it will be an interesting read none-the-less.

P.S. Having listened to the interview http://letstalkbitcoin.com/e87-the-captive-and-the-mountain/#.Uw6aWoV_e_w, I trust 2bitIdiots releases.



124. Post 5399747 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/209535200/Business-Plan-MtGox-2014-2017

*edit Bah you ^ beat me to it!



125. Post 5400059 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Holliday on February 27, 2014, 05:57:24 AM
Why are mtgox developments still this big subject here? I thought we were just going to let mtgox die already and recover without it.

The recovery is slow and boring. Train wrecks are morbidly interesting.

Well, I think it is worth discussing exactly what happened so that we are not doomed to repeat it again.



126. Post 5400167 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Holliday on February 27, 2014, 06:15:50 AM
Why are mtgox developments still this big subject here? I thought we were just going to let mtgox die already and recover without it.

The recovery is slow and boring. Train wrecks are morbidly interesting.

Well, I think it is worth discussing exactly what happened so that we are not doomed to repeat it again.

If you aren't the sole controller of your private keys, you don't have any bitcoins.

Follow that simple rule and you will not be doomed to repeat it again.

True, luckily I came away unscathed (actually slightly richer) from this whole thing so have a +1



127. Post 5400308 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: deadfi$h on February 27, 2014, 06:31:42 AM
TA is saying pennant with a bias towards the upside. Volume is saying go to sleep.

And when I do that is exactly when things will heat up  Cheesy

*edit: I really do not see any catalyst for moving higher though - full Disclosure: I have a short open



128. Post 5400462 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: TERA on February 27, 2014, 06:45:25 AM
I don't understand why ANY of you here would still have funds on mtgox. Mtgox has had blatant liquidity and management problems and been the running joke of this community for almost an entire  YEAR. I removed my funds in AUGUST. We had passed mtgox off as no longer relevant and a facade months and months ago and now suddenly it's a big deal again?

I hear you, oddly enough, after waiting 2 months for my CAD withdrawl, I moved back into BTC and got out in late September of last year.

I think though why it is a big deal again is because it is just such an astounding foible that it is hard to wrap ones mind around it. Also, depending on how things play out, this gives good insight into how one of the first exchanges functioned behind the scenes.



129. Post 5400644 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: kkaspar on February 27, 2014, 06:53:17 AM
Why are mtgox developments still this big subject here? I thought we were just going to let mtgox die already and recover without it.

I also see that some people have trouble burying their head in sand. It's weird, because usually everyone are doing it so well.
I think that someone should post a detailed guide how to do it, so we could all just deny that mtgox ever existed and continue to chant choo choo without interruptions.
I'm not saying we need to pretend like gox doesn't exist, but rather we need to acknowledge that we've moved on from gox. When I saw the price make a strong rebound from 400 during the gox crash and start recovering on its own, I was incredibly bullish. I thought "here we are, the worst has happened, and the whales are still buying. this the bottom, even with all the bad news about gox priced in and with gox completely gone. now we can move on into a new era of recovery and a new rally. bitstamp is now leading, using entirely strength from bitstamp". The price was doing perfectly fine on it's own. A slow, steady, and strong recovery would have been perfect. We don't need to add accessories like "gox might recover" and pump the price to ridiculous levels right away. All this does is add more drama and uncertaintly, and now the neverending story continues. It is a de-evolution. Now I am back in the same situation I was in for the previous 4 weeks when I was bearish instead of bullish.

In all seriousness, the situation with gox is far from over. Questions like "why did mtgox shut it's door?" and "what will happen with their customers funds?" are still unanswered. And these are the important questions. Gox just stopping trading and taking down their website meant very little. People weren't patient enough to wait for clarity about this entire situation and jumped the gun here, so in my view this rise is fragile at best. True recovery will only come if the entire bitcoin market system integrity is no longer under threat.
If it will be concluded as a fact, that mtgox customers lost their money, then there will be a shitstorm that BTC has never seen before.
To me, it's rather amusing how people try to downplay the entire situation.

+100



130. Post 5400701 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: fonzie on February 27, 2014, 07:10:10 AM
Just a quick reminder for what´s about to come in the media in the next days.

Bitcoin is a trademark held by MtGox!

If MtGox get´s broke - Bitcoin get´s
If MtGox did get hacked - Bitcoin did
......

What?  Huh



131. Post 5400729 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: MickeyT2008 on February 27, 2014, 07:15:12 AM
Surely if we take the story at face value about the theft of the coins then it becomes fraud the moment the loss of the coins is discovered if trading is allowed to continue.  That would mean from that this point in time that people were knowingly being allowed to buy coins that don't exist.  This of course would raise the question of whether trading stopped on discovery of this or later on.  Up until that point it would be incompetence, if trading continues once it's realised that there's no coins then doesn't it become a crime?

Hope he has a good lawyer.



132. Post 5400768 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 27, 2014, 07:16:54 AM
Coins that don't exist cannot be dumped on other exchanges.

Hey Billy, are you Stateless Man?

http://imgur.com/QVLlGdq



133. Post 5400834 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on February 27, 2014, 07:22:43 AM
Why are mtgox developments still this big subject here? I thought we were just going to let mtgox die already and recover without it.

The recovery is slow and boring. Train wrecks are morbidly interesting.

Well, I think it is worth discussing exactly what happened so that we are not doomed to repeat it again.

If you aren't the sole controller of your private keys, you don't have any bitcoins.

Follow that simple rule and you will not be doomed to repeat it again.

/\ This is what is happening. Just read the two bit idiot (names like pirate ponzi and bit of an idiot seem to carry weigh in Bitcoin land.)

The two bit idiot - is calling Bitcoin dead because over 7% of coins in Bitcoin are stolen.
Effectively calling it over when what we have learned is be your own bank, and if you trust someone with your Bitcoin they better provided you with evidence to be worthy. Regulation can't solve that gap.

Be wary of the two-bit idiot guy. Just found some CONFIRMED bullshit in his gox blogs.

He says in this post from Wednesday 26th http://two-bit-idiot.tumblr.com/post/77920927310/i-retract-nothing-i-have-written-so-far-regarding-mt

Quote
SecondMarket was, in fact, approached by Mt. Gox some time last weekend.  Mark Karpeles approached Barry Silbert to solicit an acquisition offer, and it seems likely that Silbert, who had already committed privately to building a US-based exchange bitcoin exchange, jumped at the opportunity to explore the deal.

However, when the magnitude of the theft and potential fraud became free, Silbert and his team quickly pulled out of discussions, sent an email to all employees over the weekend banning them from buying or selling bitcoin indefinitely, and most likely reported the suspicious activity to the authorities.  As a regulated entity that probably signed a non-disclosure agreement before learning the full extent of the Mt. Gox damage, SecondMarket would have had no other choice, but to keep this out of the public eye, even if it was acting honestly behind the scenes.


I have been following his articles and I don't think his position is that BTC is dead. Also, to lend to his credibility, in this letstalkbtc podcast Charlie Schrem confirms his legitimacy. I am trying to find the exact time-mark right now, but it is around the 40 minute mark I think.

https://soundcloud.com/mindtomatter/ltb-e87-the-captive-and-the



134. Post 5400881 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 27, 2014, 07:29:18 AM
Just a quick reminder for what´s about to come in the media in the next days.

Bitcoin is a trademark held by MtGox!

If MtGox get´s broke - Bitcoin get´s
If MtGox did get hacked - Bitcoin did
......

What?  Huh

One of the reasons people trusted Gox. Some lawyer trademark poacher tried to grab the trademark but Gox took it to hold for "safe keeping."

Ah, ty for the clarification.



135. Post 5400927 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Peter R on February 27, 2014, 07:33:57 AM
Most people they don't care how rare bitcoin is, they just care that their money is safe.

I agree.  We really need to come up with some trustless system for storing and transferring value. 

 Lips sealed



136. Post 5400981 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Holliday on February 27, 2014, 07:36:06 AM
If they use Bitcoin properly, their money is probably safer than any other asset they own.

From a technical perspective, I agree with you 100%. But you can't with all honesty say that assets stored in BTC are as safe as Fed Bonds. Now before you go and start describing how completely fabricated the US monetary system is, I am not saying it is not as fickle as you know it is. All I am saying, is that there is a lot more power behind one than the other...



137. Post 5401028 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: darbsllim on February 27, 2014, 07:42:20 AM
@thelema93

[10:58] <JonWickedFire> Is that Crisis Strategy Draft even legit?
[11:04] <MagicalTux> more or less
[11:05] <MagicalTux> as the name suggests it's a draft, and it's a bunch of proposals to deal with the issue at hand, not things that are actually planned and/or done

which channel is this from?

http://www.wickedfire.com/shooting-shit/179038-my-conversation-mark-karpeles-mtgox-2.html

http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2014/02/25/mt-gox-ceo-says-on-internet-chat-hasnt-given-up/



From reading this chat log (if its authentic) I immediately come to the following conclusions:

  • They did not have a cold wallet, it was one huge hot wallet, implemented by MT.
  • Occasionally it lost (or failed to store correctly or deleted¹) private keys of its own change outputs ('not "lost" just yet, just temporarily unavailable')
  • He seems to believe the keys are still there somewhere buried deeply somewhere in his database server ('We haven't given up')

_____________________
¹) This is how I imagine their wallet worked (and how it fucked up):

User initiates withdrawal:

* debit amount from user account
* generate new private key for change address and create tx
* store tx in database (indexed by txid)
* store private key in database (indexed by address, foreign_key=txid)
* push tx to network

a week later (cron job)

* for all unconfirmed tx older than 1 week:
*     credit BTC back to customer account
*     delete "invalid" tx
*         -> cascaded delete "unused" change address and its private key (ouch!)

run 2 years until wallet is dry, all supposed UTXO turn out to be STXO and all real UTXO are in nirvana already.




I've found corroborating evidence that this irc chat actually happened. I initially thought this IRC chat was suspect, especially with the picture of the cat on the keyboard...it wouldn't be hard to fake an IRC chat...but it's more difficult to fake Mark Karpeles's keyboard.

I was watching CBC news and I saw what looked like the exact same keyboard with some stock footage of Mark Karpeles at mtgox headquarters.

The replay of the segment is up here: http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/TV%20Shows/The%20National/ID/2439580476/

Here's the screenshot of Mark K's desk at mtgox from this CBC segment. http://grab.by/uF4M

And here's the kitty cat pic for reference: http://imgur.com/r/Bitcoin/GqZr3N5

Here's an old video of Mark K's cat on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81QkfGpHeyQ

Either the irc chat was faked and someone did extensive research and prepared the correct prop keyboard and correct prop cat, or that pic really is Mark Karpeles's keyboard and cat.

At this point, I'm thinking that irc chat actually happened.

Welcome to 12 hours ago. No offense.

*edit: That was harsh, I apologize. Though everything you stated has already been mentioned in the last 20 or so pages, I think it is nice that you put it all together in a neat viewing package for those just tuning in.



138. Post 5401203 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 27, 2014, 07:55:39 AM

Marijuana largely functions via a decentralized market, yet no matter where you go, somehow the price of an ounce of pot is always very similar (depending on the potency).


the man speaks truth

I don't want to jump in the middle of this but... http://www.priceofweed.com/ http://www.businessinsider.com/map-marijuana-prices-around-the-world-2014-2



139. Post 5401236 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Can I make a point that some people here are mixing together BTC price speculation with BTC speculation as a technology.



140. Post 5402536 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Hey guys, I love to read all this, but BTC-E is on the move. Houbi is set to follow I think. Been waiting for like 8 hours for this to start moving again...



141. Post 5493950 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on March 04, 2014, 12:04:25 AM
Just a little more patience before the next leg up. 1, 2 or maybe 3 hours?


I think the whale waits for the bid sum to increase before attempting another pennant.

What do you mean attempting another pennant?



142. Post 5494109 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on March 04, 2014, 01:12:03 AM
Just a little more patience before the next leg up. 1, 2 or maybe 3 hours?


I think the whale waits for the bid sum to increase before attempting another pennant.

What do you mean attempting another pennant?

 Huh You messing with me?  Huh

Nope, I don't understand why you say they will attempt another pennant, since a pennant is really just another name for a consolidating range triangle formation. Do you mean to say that the whales are waiting for bids to pile up so that they can dump and break-out of the current pennant that is forming?

That would make sense to me, pump the market to new heights, beef up the bid side, so they have buyers for their coin on the way down.



143. Post 5494231 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: rocks on March 04, 2014, 01:23:10 AM
goxBTC-only holders now face a very difficult choice: replace goxxed btc with fresh purchases before the price goes to Mars, or focus on alts or give up on crypto completely.


That has been exactly my thinking.

The Gox BTC disappeared into the market a long time ago and they were operating in a fractional fashion.

This means that the perceived money supply was larger than it actually was. People thought they owned coins they didn't in fact own and someone else was using. Now that the truth has come out the perceived money supply has been reduced by ~6%. MtGox people can either purchase the BTC that they wanted or exit. Exiting has already been priced in, but purchasing more drives the price up.

I'm inclined to think this could go higher soonish.

So the average actors logic is this according to that line of thought: Oh man, I lost 15K worth of BTC. That was what I was willing to loose, it was only 1-2% of my total worth. Well, looks like I lost it. Now I need to spend 30K to buy the same amount of coins back (assuming they did not buy their coins at peak price).

If they do decide to buy-back in, (fear of missing the pump train), then they certainly would not try to recover all of their coins back. More logically, the thinking would go something like this.

Oh man, I lost 15K worth of BTC. That was what I was willing to loose, it was only 1-2% of my total worth. I want to enter into the market, but I am cautious, I don't want to get hurt again. This time, I will only put in maybe 5k and see how it goes.

So yes there might be some extra buyers, but not enough to continue a drive upwards long-term. Please note that this comment does not reflect my prediction for the price, as I still see there is more manipulation upward to be had. This is just a take on investigating your logic.



144. Post 5494368 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: Richy_T on March 04, 2014, 01:39:37 AM
So the average actors logic is this according to that line of thought: Oh man, I lost 15K worth of BTC. That was what I was willing to loose, it was only 1-2% of my total worth. Well, looks like I lost it. Now I need to spend 30K to buy the same amount of coins back (assuming they did not buy their coins at peak price).

If they do decide to buy-back in, (fear of missing the pump train), then they certainly would not try to recover all of their coins back. More logically, the thinking would go something like this.

Oh man, I lost 15K worth of BTC. That was what I was willing to loose, it was only 1-2% of my total worth. I want to enter into the market, but I am cautious, I don't want to get hurt again. This time, I will only put in maybe 5k and see how it goes.

So yes there might be some extra buyers, but not enough to continue a drive upwards long-term. Please note that this comment does not reflect my prediction for the price, as I still see there is more manipulation upward to be had. This is just a take on investigating your logic.

There are no "average actors", people do not act as a homogenous whole. It is not a case of "will people do X or Y" but how many will do each.

I this case, peoples Bitcoins have been taken. They can't sell them and make the price go down. It only takes a fraction buying back to help things move up.

The only way it could affect the price negatively would be to discourage people from holding bitcoins and doubtless those who were not involved in the Gox debacle are thinking "it won't happen to me" as much as those who had funds on Gox were before the event.

CCMF

Agreed, there is no homogenous whole. Yet, my point/guess is that the group who will try to recover all their lost BTC is greatly outnumbered by those who will buy back in for less, or just not buy back in at all. Despite my bearish tone, I never suggested that this would be a catalyst for down-ward moment, just lack of upwards momentum.



145. Post 5651480 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

False start?




146. Post 5667856 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 12, 2014, 11:42:04 PM
"Almost" anything that is good for crypto is good for Bitcoin.



147. Post 5993221 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 31, 2014, 12:06:56 AM

WTF?Huh this is the speculation thread... we trade on rumors... and trading on rumors of rumors is even MOAR better!!!!!! Cheesy


Margin ALL the rumors!



148. Post 6092848 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 06, 2014, 06:21:53 AM

You have to keep doubling and betting until you win.  It is mathematically proven at least to be a break even strategy as long as the odds are exactly 50/50 like flipping a coin or black and red on a roulette wheel... so long as there are NO betting limitations.  Your point is that a guy would run out of money sooner or later, but overall it is at least a break even strategy... and pretty unlikely that a guy or gal would lose more than 10 times in a row.

 You incorporated a 10 time betting limit into your description.. which is NOT part of the theory.. and pretty unlikely.. less than 1 in a 1,000 chance of losing 10 times in a row (actually it is a 1 in 1,024.00262 chance of losing that many times in a row)...

Anyhow, if we use the $1 scenario, the odds are that you would have won more than a thousand by the time you lose 10 in a row.... which if you lose 10 in a row, you are invested $1,023 at that point in time.  If you lose one more time (11 times), then you are invested $2039, (1/2048.00524 chance). Anyhow.. sooner or later, you are going to win back your dollar, so long as you keep doubling your bet each time.. it's inevitable.. so long as the odds are 50/50.  

Of course, if you do reach that unlucky losing streak of 10 in a row, then you gotta find the capital from somewhere to keep betting and doubling the bet again.. otherwise you will lock in your losses.  

The problem, that I already mentioned, is that sometimes peeps will misunderstand or misread the odds or they will accept a betting limit or will deviate from the exact application of doubling the bet each time that you lose, until you win..

After you win, then you start over at $1 again.  

Of course, if you were going to start out with $10 or $100, then you would need 10x or 100x more capital, in the event you entered a long losing streak... but it is almost guaranteed that you will NOT lose 10 times in a row, unless the odds really are NOT 50/50.


Here is a spreadsheet if anyone is interested http://imgur.com/JuLDf9H. I made it back when I tried the strategy on Prime dice. After about 50,000 trials on Automated mode it had earned less than it took electricity to run it so long.  I think the most times I ever lost was 16 times in a row.

I can post the full file if anyone is interested in playing around with it.



149. Post 6165262 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 11, 2014, 12:42:45 AM
Balls to the wall - Im scalping the day. long at 355.
dont forget it.

+1. Yep... those prices are good!! Went all in at 360$  Wink

Ya, I don't know why you did a +1... He is scalping and probably will be out at 385, while you seem like you think BTC will recover back and are "all-in", which at this point is as risky as telling your boss you are the top poster on /r workgonewild...



150. Post 6165382 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: seleme on April 11, 2014, 01:20:18 AM
I really think we have seen the bottom.....  Shocked  we've been to the edge now lol

Post-bottoms bounces are usually more violent than what we see now. It might be some short time bottom though.


That that is a +1



151. Post 6165686 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on April 11, 2014, 01:45:33 AM
btc-e ddosed

 Angry

Or the owners hit the pause button to sell before everyone else.

Ya the latter seems more likely. It is back up now.



152. Post 6165773 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

I heard that if you say Rpietila three times in the mirror, the price drops 100!

*Faces Mirror*
Rpietila
Rpietila
R..isto...Pieti...

I can't do it!!



153. Post 6166590 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: slapper on April 11, 2014, 03:17:21 AM
Some great comments finally on r/bitcoin as this all crumbles today http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/22qc1d/as_someone_who_has_invested_140k_into_bitcoin_i/

Good to see circle jerk on the down low finally.

Some excerpts from OP's post:

"For example tomorrow I believe there is going to be a service launched that allows you to "rent" your Hard Drive space to others over the internet, and it's all validated and compensated with BTC. There are so many different applications that are going to be built on top of Bitcoin."

He got this idea from Jonathan Mohan's presentation at the NYC conference. I was there and his talk was highly future oriented, none of those features are even close to implementaion. Adding to this, it does not help that we currently have fierce competition building in the space between Blockchain 2.0 (NOT BTC 2.0), Ehterium, and Mastercoin regarding multi-asset issuance (which this renting of Hard Drive space idea is based on) and the smart contract scripting language. If you want to hear more listen to the LTB episode 99.

"Then you have remittance services that are being built on top, charging 3% to consumers instead of the dreaded 10% scenario."

The remittance services also face a lot of competition in places where they are the most popular, like Mpesa in Africa, and India Post / Vodafone in India.

"Plus (I could be mistaken) it costs each miner about $108 to line each Bitcoin. The network is fine."

I have no idea how he arrived at this figure as I (and many others on the Mining section of this forum) have been racking my brain trying to figure out how to price the production cost of a Bitcoin.

Personally, to me this guy just invested way more than the 10% of his total wealth into this, which should be the absolute limit for a speculative vehicle anyway, and is trying to make himself feel better. Add to the fact that he readily attends all the conferences, which are always full of positivity (not a bad thing), and you get a dangerous state of self-disillusion.

So I ask you, who is jerkin whose chain?



154. Post 6166936 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 11, 2014, 04:25:50 AM
huobi wants it over 400.  lots of chinese people want their coins.

Or liquidity was shot on the way down and it takes very little to push the price back up?



155. Post 6924443 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

I heard a statistic recently, I think on a Bitcoin Talk episode, that spoke about the overhead costs incurred for miners being around 550 million for last year. Keep in mind that those costs have to be paid in USD/JUAN/EUR... So, while I am happy to see that the recent balance has been broken with the miners constant selling factor being overcome, the question is for how long will it last. Merchant adoption is growing, and we all know the major PSP providers have to openly sell on the market to keep the lights on. The positive news cycle is in full swing though, so that will give this rally some legs. Summer should be interesting!



156. Post 7407187 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Guys what is happening with bitcoinwisdom? It is all outa whack.



157. Post 7407376 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Quote from: abercrombie on June 20, 2014, 12:14:52 AM
Guys what is happening with bitcoinwisdom? It is all outa whack.
huObi is broken, use OKCoin instead.

I know Houbi buff their numbers already, but whats going on really?

Heh, J/K, thanks for the heads up.




158. Post 7461638 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on June 23, 2014, 03:51:03 AM
So any idea why China is dumping hard? I find it hard to believe this happened without a reason.

My sources are saying that the ceos of all the major exchanges have been arrested.

Hah, all of them eh?



159. Post 7678848 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

I love you all (well most of you), but the quality of this thread... has... well... you know...

And before you say to yourself: "Then why are you here!?" To that I say, same reason you are, I am a glutton for punishment.



160. Post 7711440 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: damnek on July 07, 2014, 01:44:26 AM
Here's the trade, for future reference:


so almost 133 BTC sold for $9798.99 each??


how is this not bigger news....


some eccentric whale testing the waters?  a drunk day trader?  time travelers from 2015? Wink

Bitcoinwisdom consolidates buys and shows the highest buy price. So even if out of the entire order only 0.0001 btc gets bought for $1 it would look like 133 btc got bought at $10k.

Ok, I understand the part about consolidating the bids. But under what real scenario would there ever a mBTC trade that goes for 1$?



161. Post 8531328 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: DutchTrades on August 25, 2014, 07:46:41 PM
movement incomming

Wow... solid contribution.



162. Post 8879254 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Quote from: podyx on September 18, 2014, 07:40:33 PM
now i thinking about suicide! (no joke) Undecided


What you should do before you commit suicide is take huge fucking loans from the bank, go heavy on the leverage and wait 1 year and see if you're rich. If not, you can contionue to your first step

edit: lol@above post

Kenji, if you are seriously suicidal, as a result of your "investing" activities, do not fucken listen to Podyx...



163. Post 9012757 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.17h):

Quote from: klee on September 29, 2014, 06:49:45 AM
I am buying 5btc for every 10$ drop, lets see if I get broke! Tongue

 Cry



164. Post 9178098 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.23h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on October 12, 2014, 08:12:59 PM
Wall moved to 370. Looks great but i'm afraid it's the same guy who will be dumping shitloads later.

But later at a higher price  Wink , for now skip to step #3 - Profit.



165. Post 9438109 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Too much serious business here lately, why can't we just party like it's out of sight? Houbi knows what's up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoCgOVSVWJI



166. Post 10304708 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: Arpeggio on January 29, 2015, 10:47:36 PM
It would be nice to see it rocket up again - some of my mates lost lots of money in BTC. I myself managed to pull pretty substantial profit from it, but I joined the choo train a bit late. TA is just TA in the end - manage risk/ride the wave of volatility. There is serious manipulation going on, I am very curious to see where this will be in 6 months or so. Double digits are probably out of question, but I wouldnt be suprised if it "stabilized" in 1XX which will eradicate weak hands. Perhaps, just like all great ideas ,eg. communism in its purest form, BTC will slowly dwindle away and never reach its full potential.. not to mention be used for what it was intended to be used for...

This is one of the more sensible newbie posts I have read yet. Kudos!



167. Post 10322682 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

I have a question for you guys:

You own 5k bit-coins. What do you do? Serious question.



168. Post 10322872 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

Quote from: ParabellumLite on January 31, 2015, 08:39:18 PM
I have a question for you guys:

You own 5k bit-coins. What do you do? Serious question.

Sell all of it immediatly, and maybe buy back lower. I definately wouldn't keep them at that phase. Then again, I would've exited a long time ago already, around the 500 dollar mark.

All good answers, I hope the community can take a hint from these replies.

Other acceptable answers include: 1) Start a incubator and offer to exchange golden tokens for real human capital or 2) Leverage 200X and splash in the kiddy pool to your hearts content



169. Post 10322882 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

Quote from: damiano on January 31, 2015, 09:31:44 PM
Bulls!




170. Post 10322948 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 31, 2015, 09:39:40 PM
Look at the bears go

1-2% decline in price and they start gigglin like a schoolgirl
It's cute Cheesy

True.

Haha.

It is not necessarily the percentage decrease, it is the positioning of the market players that has bears salivating. If/when wall-street is coming in, it sure as is not coming in at these levels. I would say they are looking for desperation before making a move to the upside. At least that is what they have done time and time again in futures/equities/capital markets...



171. Post 10322990 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

Quote from: magicmexican on January 31, 2015, 09:45:16 PM
Oh boy did that pump ended badly. Cut your goose, we are going down to the dark dephs of 1xx range. The search for the holy bottom continues.

Every pump since the high's has been engineered to build up retail bids in order for people highly capitalized in BTC to exit... Just look at what you all said just minutes ago regarding what to do if you had a substantial stockpile of BTC.

The problem, is when you want to exit something, and doing so crashes the prices to the point at which your stash becomes nearly useless, a slow exit on pumps is the only way out...



172. Post 10323262 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

Quote from: coins101 on January 31, 2015, 10:18:25 PM
Google adds crypto, and the price goes down  Huh



Price of BTC the currency is not relevant to the utility value of BTC the technology. Google adding crypto speaks to the latter not the former.



173. Post 10323381 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.55h):

Quote from: coins101 on January 31, 2015, 10:35:47 PM
Google adds crypto, and the price goes down  Huh



Price of BTC the currency is not relevant to the utility value of BTC the technology. Google adding crypto speaks to the latter not the former.

Utility doesn't pay the utility company.

They are not mutually exclusive.

Price is everything.

I did not mean to imply that the value of BTC the currency is irrelevant to the network as a whole. Miner's (utility companies if you will) depend on it yes. I was simply saying that the two can't be melded into one in a causation type of relationship.



174. Post 10421005 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: VincentX on February 10, 2015, 09:33:09 PM
Greece is a basket case. It's not all that complicated to understand if you have a solid grounding in economics and human nature. Tsipras and Varoufakis are lefties elected to erase the consequences of a country spending far more than they earned for a prolonged time period. They face an impossible task and they know it, so they are busy blaming others for their obvious impending failure to do what they promised to do. Breaking promises seems to be the Greek national pastime. No sane person would want to negotiate with these bad faith actors even if they weren't deluded socialists.

This is essentially correct. Greece has had a negative trade balance for a very long time now, with no improvements on the horizon.

Greece will get kicked out of the EU. The EU is going to crumble because Greece is far from the only country in such economic dire straits. They are merely the first to default. These sovereign defaults will either take down many large European banks or usher in an era of massive currency devaluation. As nation after nation in the EU goes back to their own national currencies, Germany will find itself in a position of having nobody to sell it's goods to that has any money. Capital will flow in torrents into safe places, first Switzerland and England but later and in greater volume the USA.

This is completely wrong and demonstrates a clear lack of understanding of both European politics and European economics. Our institutions are complex and never straightforward. Even most Europeans don't understand them. You would do well to learn more about them before saying rediculous things like that.

Nevertheless: Greece will not be kicked out of the European Union. They will not leave the Eurozone or be kicked out of it. Leaving either the Eurozone or the Union would not absolve their debts. There will be more negotiations. A settlement will eventually be reached. The EU will continue to heavily subsidize Greece, which Greece is dependent on to survive. Their economy will take a turn for the worse but they'll still be better off than in any other situation.

As a whole, the EU is still running a trade surplus and is as such doing okay. Despite what you believe, Germany amounts to only 20% of the EU's economy and does not dominate European policy. This percentage is actually shrinking as eastern Europe developes. There is no massive currency devalutation nor is there one in the making. There isn't a single serious effort to reinstute national currencies, as not a single country would stand to benefit from it.

There is a whole lot of exaggeration when it comes to European economic and political instability (which is mostly just perception), and it seems you've fallen prey to it.

I can't stress enough how much I appreciate people like Vincent here. A clear and concise counter, based in economic realities, not economic "principles," to what global media / billyjoeallen has spun as the truth.



175. Post 12672839 (copy this link) (by CoinDox) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on October 12, 2015, 10:12:24 PM
seem to recall, several years ago, an announcement by some exchange that they were implementing "shadow" book orders, that are invisible to most ordinary clients.  Perhaps they just started showing shadow-book trades on the ordinary ticker, to boost their public volume numbers...
That seems to be what's happening. But why would they want a lot of off book transactions? Don't they make money based on a percentage of the order cost? Why would they not want the price to rise as much as possible?

OKCoin and Huobi do not charge fees for trading, only for deposit and/or withdrawal, and interest on leveraged trading. As I recall, the shadow book was meant to cater for clients who wanted to trade on the exchange, but did not want their large orders to affect the price against them. (I may have misunderstood, and I don't know whether that makes sense.)

It's hard to see responses between all these ChartBuddys.

Thanks, I think they would be better for all if we could actually see the effects of the trades that are happening.

Right, so we are supposed to belive that while BFX volume has continued at an a consistent mostly anaemic pace for the last 2 months, OKC and Huobi have a bunch of 50k BTC orders that they suddenly decided to announce in their volume figures ...OK .... <sips Kool Aid> .... perfectly reasonable explanation.
Oh wait ...no announcement from an exchange that is being accused of faking numbers that they have a valid reason for suddenly higher numbers. OK ... <sips more> that makes perfect sense

 Roll Eyes

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck ... most likely explanation is 'it's definitely not a duck'   Grin

Exchange volume is anaemic (excluding these wash trades) ... has been for months, and continues to be ...
Masterluc's 'Silent Phase' ...
Unfortunately this does not attract  more 'hot' money, so numbers are being fudged ... Occam's Razor

Although much of the volume on OKCoin and Houbi is trading from the left hand to the right, which clearly masks the underlying anemic trends, they control the public's mind-share in terms of overall price as a result of their gross volume figures. I think that whatever those large orders are: shadow book opened up or otherwise, are actually the seeds of a back-up plan being planted for the eventual halving. Let me explain.

Below a certain price level X, profitability of large scale mining operations begins to approach the break-even point - prices do not stay here very long short-term. Long term, the goal is (and has been) to keep the average well above price level X. When we half the rewards, we automatically half profits. Outside of a black swan event, prices need to be at least 2X in 13 some odd months for the whole game to continue being profitable for the miner. The Long-Con is keeping the music playing long enough for more retail traders to come in so that institutions finally have a profitable demographic to exploit.

Edit: Some people will skim this and think, oh man bitcoin will double in price in 13 months, I am less broke! You sir, are wrong, try again. Price level X is dynamic and depends on various factors, from mining technology, to electricity prices, to even global macro conditions. Price level X could shrink by a factor of 4 even while the 2X "halving price multiplier" remains constant.