All posts made by r0ach in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 7356287 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.53h):

Quote from: Gingermod on June 17, 2014, 04:38:42 AM


Sell me this pencil



2. Post 8003514 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.00h):

This post explains what happened to the BTC price today:

Quote from: r0ach on July 24, 2014, 01:47:06 PM
Horseshit. Your private BTC would end up with the rest of the development funds that must be used on that and that alone.

Says who?  There's no law requiring this.  The user agreement says they don't even have to deliver a product at all and can take the money and buy crack rocks with it if they want.









3. Post 8061524 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.01h):

Quote from: BitChick on July 28, 2014, 04:56:38 AM
More importantly, what is the point of selling coins right now?

Why I don't own BTC right now:

Quote from: r0ach on July 28, 2014, 03:55:08 AM
The current Bitcoin model is already an obvious failure while people walk around in a delusional state pretending it isn't.  It's advertised as requiring "no trusted 3rd parties", yet the entire thing relies on them in the form of a small number of mining pools for block verification.  Since Bitcoin never solved the "no trusted 3rd parties" dilemma, it's time to admit that and come up with a solution, most likely assign a performance metric to regulate those parties (i.e. PoS with reputation variable).

Unless every single iota of Bitcoin dev manpower is redirected towards the solitary goal of getting rid of mining pools, they're operating under the textbook definition of insanity.

It would be different if this was the number one priority for Bitcoin development, but it seems to barely even be a side issue.  The entire BTC protocol is busted from the top down until this is solved.



4. Post 8061690 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.01h):

Quote from: InstantBitcoin on July 28, 2014, 05:27:16 AM



===>GET ON BOARD /\BTCITCOIN TO $1000+ IN AUGUST!!!!   Cool     //eZ^$$$

First all male civilization to reproduce asexually?



5. Post 9375894 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

The effects of these meaningless $10 steps that are a part of normal BTC fluctuation suddenly become a lot bigger deal when you're at this price level o_O.  Even though the number 300 means absolutely nothing for technical purposes, shit is gonna hit the fan if it breaks that, but I highly doubt it's gonna just crash through previous ATH.



6. Post 9375941 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Quote from: Newbie1022 on October 30, 2014, 12:16:43 AM
Just bought 40 BTC... I figure, even if it crashes, I'll see this price again and at least slightly higher. Might as well make some money off this goofy s---. Will it go lower, probably. I don't care to get too cute and try to find the bottom or get caught up in an irrational buy rally.

The main problem I see right now is these Ethereum fuckers just sitting on an ocean of coins they want to unload to buy private islands.  I can see them crashing the market from anywhere all the way down to 260's if they try hard enough, but not breaking that level.



7. Post 9385746 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.28h):

ETA until Ethereum fires the ground to air missiles to vaporize the rocket?



8. Post 9385991 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.28h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on October 30, 2014, 07:30:33 PM
ETA until Ethereum fires the ground to air missiles to vaporize the rocket?
Hmm, tinfoil hat tingling Smiley Could be something in that, not read up much on Ethereum but as far as I know it will more or less need Bitcoin's success to succeed its self, either that or have some big (as in corporate) names behind it. The charts are almost a how to manipulate the market guide, steadyish high volume selling earlier then a big kick to get it bouncing with a push up each bounce, itchy trigger fingers are definitely helping though.

I should have been more specific.  I meant the Ethereum IPO money crashing the BTC buy side walls.  I don't really have any faith in the success of Ethereum itself.



9. Post 9406153 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.28h):

Ethereum just moved 1400 or so BTC to sell btw.  Price should be going lower.  I have a feeling some organization like the Carlyle group will leverage the Ethereum down pressure to bottom out BTC then buy it up during some time frame in the next few months.



10. Post 9406724 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 01, 2014, 07:37:17 PM
and the attractiveness of BTC as an investment cannot be growing

I made a pretty solid case that if BTC does not go below previous ATH levels, which most people don't expect it to do, that BTC has already entered savings account level of interest rates (5%ish per year) in a bad case scenario where the price only remains stagnant but BTC keeps on surviving:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837260.msg9353457#msg9353457



11. Post 9406817 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 01, 2014, 08:15:18 PM
Academic interest in bitcoin only. Not owner, not trader, very skeptical of its longterm success.

Your signature above.  After fiat collapses, what do you expect people to be using?  Gold?  Barter with seashells?  Obviously gold will be around, and all Bitcoin has to do is survive until that moment of fiat implosion happens to catch much of the same incoming cash flow gold receives.



12. Post 9529854 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Behold, the orchestrated volumeless rally



13. Post 9556084 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.32h):

Price is retreating right back to the average I put forth in this post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837260



14. Post 9556693 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.32h):

Quote from: xcapator on November 16, 2014, 01:32:24 AM
wow.... bitcoin is crashing hard. Merchant sell pressure and no sign of recovery, wouldn't surprise me to hit 350 again by next monday. Good thing im in litecoin where the ratio is going up everyday and I can trade ltc/usd to compund that




15. Post 9619593 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.34h):

Quote from: bitebits on November 22, 2014, 08:27:34 AM
Seems like the price will be nicely kept into the 350$ area, likely till the auction ends on the first of December.
The dumping of a few 100 coins as soon as it hits 360$ is almost too obvious.

The r0achanomics spread shows $350 as the short term equilibrium price:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837260.0



16. Post 10106021 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on January 10, 2015, 03:20:32 PM
The group we don't have and which we need are new users. Well, after 6 years we can safely say they won't show up anymore.

People will be piling into both gold and bitcoin, but only after the stock market bubble implodes.  My more drawn out post on why:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915140



17. Post 10106727 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: diabLEEca on January 10, 2015, 07:16:33 PM
People will be piling into both gold and bitcoin, but only after the stock market bubble implodes.  My more drawn out post on why:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915140

I've read your post and I generally agree with you. Have you got any idea when the implosion could take place, though, or what (if anything in particular) could possibly trigger it?

The stock market bubble will implode after this trading strategy ceases to function:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0akBdQa55b4

Nobody knows the answer to things like this since it's all testing the boundaries of Keynesianism, or how long can a population be held hostage and forced into certain asset classes to avoid loss of wealth.  It's a "greater fool" situation relying on multiple parties, quasi-government kosher reserve and traders/investors, much of which is dumb money retirement funds.  

Obviously, they'll initiate a controlled demolition to enrich themselves and their cronies on insider information as soon as the Keynesian policy is completely unsustainable, but only Warren Buffet or Jimmy Buffet knows when that happens.



18. Post 10147177 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 14, 2015, 06:35:59 AM
Anyway, I would guess that the next interesting price is 125 $/BTC, and after that 50 $/BTC.

The next interesting price would probably be the energy cost of production, which I think is around $150, then you have the hardware costs on top of that.  It's already under total cost of production, but I think the energy cost of production number is probably a big thing.



19. Post 10147412 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Bitcoin might be the only asset in world history where at any given moment you feel like you should either sell everything or go all in simultaneously.



20. Post 10147714 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

With Bitstamp leading this crash, feels like some kind of fishy MtGox situation going on...



21. Post 11824463 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Is that the bearwhale on Bitstamp back in action?



22. Post 11824679 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: inca on July 08, 2015, 05:53:21 PM
Is that the bearwhale on Bitstamp back in action?

Can't spot it, but if it would try to break the uptrend now it would surely fail because it failed last time and the market is way more optimistic now  Wink

The price is certainly being managed today. Don't want bitcoin spiking when the NYSE is halted and China is crashing.

Hrm.

Yea, something fishy going on at Bitstamp.  Keep seeing big sell walls come and go, then wall disappears and 400 coins dumped, then sell wall comes back then off, etc.



23. Post 11840876 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Shorters jumping off roofs.

Nevermind, Bernanke and Greenspan have now walled up the red side.



24. Post 12066815 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

The next 24 hours are critical for the price of Bitcoin if Warren Buffet or Jimmy Buffet were to look at the price of Bitcoin in the next 24 hours.



25. Post 12532308 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: abercrombie on September 26, 2015, 11:23:44 PM
are we rich yet??  Huh

The biggest margin call in Poloniex history happens soon, then afterwards maybe:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1171109.msg12531970#msg12531970



26. Post 12602349 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.27h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on October 04, 2015, 10:26:36 PM
There's just too many alternatives.  I'm looking into bitshares.

Bitshares + BTC are the only two coins I hold right now and BTS might be about to do a +2000% soon:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1200084.0



27. Post 12707062 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

The plan has always been to wait for inflation to go down (to 12 btc) then pump to the moon.



28. Post 12716230 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

BITCOIN SHORTERS ALL KICKED TO DEATH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6UTz_Doic8



29. Post 12716845 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Halving will take it to $400.  The increased media attention might create another bubble to go much higher.



30. Post 12719152 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on October 18, 2015, 12:15:16 PM
higher-ups in the PRC have told Bobby Lee personally that they don't want another speculative bubble.

Didn't stop government insiders from trying to front run the recovery in China under penalty of death.


Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 17, 2015, 03:14:42 AM
May you all go broke, and burn in hell...

The price didn't moon yet, you can still get in now.



31. Post 12719592 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: gentlemand on October 18, 2015, 01:32:19 PM
Halving will take it to $400.  The increased media attention might create another bubble to go much higher.

The media cottons on when all time highs are being smashed, not when there's a rise that was easily creamed over two years ago. It might pop up here and there but I doubt it'll get many mouths watering in the same way.

It doesn't matter at all about highs.  Media everywhere will report "Bitcoin 50% up" and everyone will be like, "OMG Bitcoin not dead and going up, time to sell house for Bitcoin."

Then it's time to.....

LOAD THE SPACESHIPS WITH THE ROCKET FUEL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF4ZTcuhixc



32. Post 12728255 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: vrzo on October 19, 2015, 09:28:20 AM
Mining is not decentralized at all. If few people control (own) mining facilities in China and the rest of the world - this is not decentralization - even is none of them controls more than 10% of hashpower.

Bitcoin security model is based around fault recovery instead of fault prevention.  It fails often, as in the case of Ghash getting 50% hash rate that one time, then transient miners fix it.  In the future, there would probably be agencies that monitor hash rate and warn retailers about transacting in large amounts of money during periods of activity like that.  Just like you might not want to move a bunch of gold with a tornado outside.




33. Post 12735870 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: noobtrader on October 20, 2015, 04:35:48 AM
i'd love to see my stash worth more but realistically there are bitcoin auction in Nov, then Dec is holiday season.  i dont really think we will break 300 soon.

The auctions don't really negatively or positively affect price.  If anything, they will positively affect it after someone gets a huge stash then tries to manipulate it up.



34. Post 12736911 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 20, 2015, 12:44:59 PM
there won't be any results, just usual post auction slow dump.  

Nobody is buying coins at an auction when they usually have to pay a premium in order to dump them right after.  Only way this is happening is if nobody bids except like one guy, but that's clearly not the case.



35. Post 12761433 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

So many forum accts with 2 posts posting "Sell everyting coin go 0 sell now or lose everyting".  I guess that means $400-600 soon.



36. Post 12762665 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 23, 2015, 07:06:40 AM
The next 12 hours are critical....

The next 12 nanoseconds are critical.



37. Post 12764513 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 23, 2015, 01:15:56 PM
My guess is that the month-long rise from ~220 to ~270 was due to MMM's "Republic of Bitcoin" ponzi, while the spike to ~280 over the last two days was due to the VAT decision.

It seems that the VAT news have already been forgotten.  "Wat VAT?"  Cheesy

I would guess the MMM had between 0 and 0/1 effect on price.



38. Post 12766188 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 23, 2015, 03:52:33 PM
I would guess the MMM had between 0 and 0/1 effect on price.

Then what is your explanation for that rise?

Pretty god damn obvious, at least 500 billion dollars attempting to leave China, some of which is going into Bitcoin, and the halving is just beginning to start to have an initial price effect.  Negative interests rates gaining steam + more China fever + halving all at the same time = the perfect storm beginning.

http://www.armstrongeconomics.com/archives/38474



39. Post 12770593 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on October 24, 2015, 07:14:50 AM
We're probably at a bit of a tipping point now sitting at 280. I can't see us staying at 280 for long. I think we'll swing fairly significantly either way but which way?

I whistled for a cab and when it came near, the license plate said bitcoin and it had Jorge Stolfi in the mirror.  If anything I could tell you this cab was rare, but I thought man forget it, yo holmes to $400.




40. Post 12773767 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.28h):

Look at all these shorters losing their shirts talking about MtGox coins LOL.  If MtGox coins are auctioned off, it would be 56 million at current price to many different bidders, not one party.  Sounds higher than your paycheck, but BitFury alone is building a 100 million dollar mining facility right now, so not exactly a big deal.  That and you have billions in VC investment in 2015 alone:

http://insidebitcoins.com/news/bitcoin-venture-capital-funding-pace-1-billion-2015/30665

It's clear that the price per coin is highly lagged behind everything else going on, and these entities can all easily pump it higher, they're just waiting till they accumulate most of them first (i.e. after the 25coin halving since 70% are already mined).



41. Post 12780747 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Satoshi State of the Union Address

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1220083.0



42. Post 12781219 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

It's hilarious Stolfi is trying to claim Bitcoin is rising due to a Russian criminal that's running some kind of Ponzi scam.  The scam doesn't even have anything to do with Bitcoin, he just accepts Bitcoin as payment, and it's already existed for like 3 years.  You need a sub 80 IQ to even click on them.  In other words, this guy has absolutely nothing to do with Bitcoin price:



It's like trying to claim the price of Bitcoin is going up because of Tai Lopez:




43. Post 12781398 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: yolalanda
True, MMM ponzi only uses BTC, Just like the Bitcoin ponzi itself.
And Bitcointalk.org also promotes MMM, see here,
It's turtles all the way down Smiley

You link to something from 2012 then claim it's the cause of the BTC rise now when you would have to be completely brain dead to believe that.  Better luck with your next conspiracy theory and have fun with your failed short at $250.  I bet you're staring at the screen sweating right now lol.



44. Post 12781841 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 17, 2015, 03:14:42 AM
May you all go broke, and burn in hell...




45. Post 12781906 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Sunday is the day when all random slobs wake up and look at the BTC price once per week and say, "wtf, is this shit going to the moon? do I need to buy now? omg mortgaging house"



46. Post 12782622 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 25, 2015, 02:17:06 PM
The tiny difference is that no one is trying to convince Brazilians to "invest" their money in reals; quite the opposite.  And no one is promising that the real will "go to the moon" -- like Andreessen, Silbert, the Winkles, and all other bitcoin peddlers are doing.

Every currency, whether it's fiat, gold, or Bitcoin is a pyramid scheme.  You either choose to barter for goods and services instead to avoid that, or you pick the pyramid that functions as the best store of value or potential for future returns.



47. Post 12793356 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: smiletyson on October 26, 2015, 06:20:16 PM
Price is declining, (it declined $10 since yesterday)
Sell pressure is high. Downtrend is on.

But you shorted so that means it will go up.



48. Post 12809978 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Around now is when we reach the phase of Hero and Legendary members to start making bear posts, either with their normal account or 1 post account, due to the fact that they sold everything and were waiting for "the bottom" and forgot to buy before it raised.  Then we will hit $350 and they look at the screen in shock and buy, then it drops to $325 and they become bulls.



49. Post 12819440 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: aztecminer on October 29, 2015, 11:09:58 AM
not really... it s federal marshal's auction pump..

Are you guys mentally retarded?  The federal govt can just print money out of thin air anytime they want, yet you believe they're going to pump Bitcoin for some meaningless auction for a trivial amount of money?  Out of all the conspiracy theories for why the price is increasing, this one is dead last.



50. Post 12822157 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

BTC hit $330 in China

The first of the media coverage leading to the Bitcoin bubble 2.0:

"however if a few hundred million Chinese decide that the time has come to use bitcoin as the capital controls bypassing currency of choice, and decide to invest even a tiny fraction of the $22 trillion in Chinese deposits in bitcoin (whose total market cap at last check was just over $3 billion), sit back and watch as we witness the second coming of the bitcoin bubble, one which could make the previous all time highs in the digital currency, seems like a low point."

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-29/bitcoin-soars-near-highest-2014-china-outflows-accelerate



51. Post 12822369 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

The next 24 hours are denominated by relative units of account known as minutes.



52. Post 12822505 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: TaurusBit on October 29, 2015, 04:47:38 PM
Let's break 320... Then ChooChooMF

It already hit $330 in China ...



53. Post 12822518 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Chalkbot on October 29, 2015, 04:48:10 PM
Hey, since it's rally season apparently, I want some new bitcoin songs. Get to it, people who do that kind of shit.

Official Bitcoin Bubble 2.0 song

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYDAF6NbgKc



54. Post 12822571 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Chalkbot on October 29, 2015, 04:52:42 PM
Haha, a classic. I sing this in the shower sometimes.

Cyndi Lauper also wrote a song about Bitcoin in 1985.  Read the lyrics:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sKbvN--oH8



55. Post 12822994 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

China is building a floor at $324-325



56. Post 12823146 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Dump leveling off at 2060 yuan and holding ($324). 

Eat shit shorters!




57. Post 12824694 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: peonminer on October 29, 2015, 08:25:08 PM
China is absorbing the dumps! $350 tippy toppity here we come!

Breaking News:  China has declared war on fiat!





58. Post 12826727 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on October 30, 2015, 01:50:15 AM
This is starting to look extremely fake in my opinion those Chinese exchanges are ridiculous.

$341 in China.  They're just dumping US treasuries out of one door and bringing in wheelbarrows full of Bitcoin through the other door.



59. Post 12829650 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 30, 2015, 08:45:01 AM
The price does seem to grow exponentially

Stolfi Bitcoin bull confirmed.




60. Post 12830168 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on October 30, 2015, 10:59:31 AM
These fast rises of mysterious origin usually stop very suddenly

I think it's starting to become clear that people heavily underestimated the severity of the financial problem in China and a component of what you're seeing right now is insiders attempting to do a myraid of things such as avoid devaluation, hedge, and avoid capital controls:

"in 2007 and right before the world was swept in the worst financial crisis in history, China had only $7.4 trillion in debt, or 158% in consolidated debt/GDP. Since then this debt has risen to over $30 trillion (specifically $28.2 trillion as of Q2, 2014) representing a staggering 300% debt/GDP.  

"This means that China was responsible for more than a third of all the $57 trillion debt created since 2007, making a mockery of the QE unleashed by all the DM central banks"

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-29/ghost-cities-finally-died-chinas-steel-industry-outlook-worst-ever-amid-unprecedente

They can't go to stocks or domestic real estate to put their money somewhere.  If they want to go into foreign real estate, they need to avoid capital controls (Bitcoin).   Since the price of BTC was suppressed all this time and has a halving coming up to make it a very safe buy, this China bubble might become far bigger than the last.  It wouldn't really be that astonishing to me hitting something like $600 from the halving, so I won't be looking at my screen in amazement until it hits something like $750+.




61. Post 12830651 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.29h):

Quote from: gizmoh on October 30, 2015, 11:58:37 AM
Guess the Chinese Fomo rally is over ( or eased) with this news.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-30/yuan-soars-most-decade-china-moves-relax-capital-controls

Except your link says: 

"expectations that Beijing is ultimately targeting a 20% devaluation in order to boost said imploding economy"

So stay in Yuan and lose 20%?  Or buy Bitcoin and gain at least 50% from halving and avoid the 20% devaluation as well?  Usually white kids with autism win all the math tournaments, but the Chinese might be able to figure that problem out.



62. Post 12830854 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: pleaseexplainagain on October 30, 2015, 12:33:15 PM
yes for whatever reason buying pressure stopped about $333. Its already down to $318 and nearly the $313 it opened at today. We may see a lot bigger drop than to $300 - as in low 200s as all those that rushed in rush right back out.

Here comes the fraud posts from shorters and people who were waiting to buy the bottom but got left behind.

Quote from: gizmoh on October 30, 2015, 12:20:43 PM
That particular comment is from zerohedge pseudonymous writer..  Zerohedge  = An apocalyptic world viewing angle!

Zerohedge is always right, just off by timings of months, years, decades.



63. Post 12830998 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Lauda on October 30, 2015, 12:43:34 PM
What's wrong with people here? If the price returns back from green (e.g. $10) into a daily green of e.g. $2 you'e trying to tell me that it is going down by $100? If anything, this rise is very similar to that one in late 2013. You can easily see this at Bitstamp (note: I'm not saying that it will follow the same pattern). Stop with the trolling and pointless observations.

It's all the idiots who were full fiat and 0 coins and were waiting for "the bottom" to go all in for momentum trade but it went up without them.  Now they're waiting on the first dip to go all in and they pray it will be as large as possible.  The absolute worst case scenario would be taking the average of the increase, $240 to $330 = 90/2 = $45, then adding that to the base = $285.  But then the huge amount of shorts + people who wanted in on dip would instantly take it back to $300.  So even in worst case scenario, you're looking at somewhere around $300 if it actually did crash, but the Chinese seem pretty set on building a $325 base.  

If I had to guess what would happen in the next 48 hours, I give it 50% chance China and the US meet at $325 and go sideways, and 50% chance China keeps pushing to god knows wherever they are going.



64. Post 12831365 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

China Wei Lei bot apparently says below $335 not allowed.



65. Post 12831523 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Bots in China still buying anything and everything that goes below $335.  China going to drag America upward.



66. Post 12832226 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 30, 2015, 02:54:35 PM
I didn't read the article, but this alleged quote was posted on another forum:

Quote
Bitcoin itself may never be more than a curiosity. However blockchains have a host of other uses because they meet the need for a trustworthy record, something vital for transactions of every sort.

Yes, Stolfi, we are all aware the New World Order wants to have private block chains that only exist between banks which is nothing but a database replicating the system that already exists.  Since such a system would be doing nothing but upgrading the back end of the bank, it would provide pretty much 0 competition against Bitcoin.



67. Post 12837465 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 31, 2015, 03:17:00 AM


I suppose flash crash lines are useful if you're trading margin, but for the rest of the world, especially if you actually want to buy some, it's this.  If China can't hold 350, it's going to test 340, then go to 330 as backup.  The bots about 8 hours ago were buying anything and everything under $335 in China, so it should hold pretty high.  No point really in just dumping everything when we're on uptrend anyway that will hit 500+ for halving.  This is a clear case of knowing what the bots are doing is far more useful than any form of TA.




68. Post 12837600 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on October 31, 2015, 03:58:52 AM
correction time? maybe monday morning in Beijing will be fun.

IMO, China floor = 2115 yuan ($335) and average price if it stops will be sideways at 2150 ($340).  American arb might then drag China down to $330 over the course of days.  Maybe they will keep pushing higher though.  China might want to go to $400.



69. Post 12837729 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Nasdaq August tweet comes to pass.  He made no mention of XT dragging it down, so I guess it's an even safer haven than he imagines heh:

https://twitter.com/NASDAQ/status/629363305598046208



70. Post 12837856 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

China is fighting way harder than I expected to hold $350.  They're actually trying to build a floor here.  People buying at US prices are definitely going to be well off.



71. Post 12839955 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):




72. Post 12840261 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: OSCA on October 31, 2015, 12:31:30 PM
If enough people think that, selling @300 is exactly what he should do Smiley

I will sell when the USD/BTC chart looks like the Venezuelen/USD exchange rate.  At that point, I guess I can just spend instead of convert:




73. Post 12843838 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

China wants to converge at 2150 yuan ($340) and that's exactly where the price is.  America will need to be dragged there.




74. Post 12844089 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

This is insane, China holding $340 with strong support while the US is $315.  Feels like they know something we don't.  Look at that huge buy wall at 2150 yuan wtf.



75. Post 12844181 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 31, 2015, 08:20:30 PM
chinaman will pull his gambit tonight or one of these days anyway.

It appears China gives no fucks about Shitstamp bears.



76. Post 12844274 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

The dumpers already exhausted all their ammo with basically more volume than it took to bring us here.  If your short is anywhere under 310 you're probably shit out of luck and might as well cover:




77. Post 12844317 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Spider-Carnage on October 31, 2015, 08:42:24 PM
Man, I dont think $300 is going to hold for long. Might go back in a while, though god knows where we'll be at when the dust settles a few months from now.

It will stay above $300, the order books are too healthy around $310.  It might flail up and down all over the place for a while, but China and the US will stay above  $300 after it settles.



78. Post 12844366 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 31, 2015, 08:48:44 PM
I sold and then borrowed that cash, and waited good entry point for shorts.

I love these shorters.  They make like $10 per trade for weeks then short at $125 before it goes to $1200 and lose everything.  This time they'll short $300 before it goes to $3000 and lose the rest.  CYNK went to five billion dollars with one employee, no product, and no revenue.  If the Bitcoin blockchain stopped working permanently, it would probably still 10x in price.



79. Post 12844460 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Shorters all fucked.  The ascending triple bottom in China is in:




80. Post 12844614 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: alesx.onfire on October 31, 2015, 09:12:02 PM
thanks god, i dump at 2200 cny

In China, coin buy you.



81. Post 12850261 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):




82. Post 12851341 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

The next 24 dollars upwards are critical.



83. Post 12852350 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Every single post is:

1)  "wahhhh I went full fiat like an idiot and the price went up so now I need to think of any excuse possible for it to go down because I don't want to pay any markup"

2)  "I'm a greedy idiot and tried to short at 290 and it blew the doors off my shorts so time to spam any excuse I can think of for it to go down and I pray to god it doesn't go to 400"



84. Post 12853361 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: shmadz on November 01, 2015, 09:32:32 PM
I am wait, hope Tami is right, this is not the end for accumulation period.

I hope...

What were you doing for the past year when the price was just a straight line at 225?  Did you people think Satoshi was gonna call you and say, "Yo dog, I'm bout to jack the price up on this shit again, gonna give you 48 hours to get in before I hit up Huobi before I take it to the moon".



85. Post 12853416 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on November 01, 2015, 10:19:51 PM
lol



The large amount of shorts is good, that means the buying pressure will dwarf that of longs cashing out.  If the price is continuing to increase even with all those shorts, that means the nervous bitch ass shorters scared of losing everything while it keeps going up will be closing and propping up the price too and preventing any big drops.



86. Post 12853531 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Wei Lei bot laughs at your shorts.



87. Post 12853566 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on November 01, 2015, 10:49:33 PM
Most probably. People really shouldn't sell into that wall. He should suffer more  Grin

I told him Oct 31st but he did not listen:

Quote from: r0ach on October 31, 2015, 08:39:30 PM
The dumpers already exhausted all their ammo with basically more volume than it took to bring us here.  If your short is anywhere under 310 you're probably shit out of luck and might as well cover:





88. Post 12854790 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

No wonder China is buying Bitcoin like mad, they got a bunch of Bernie Madoff funds about to implode:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-11-01/partner-chinas-carl-icahn-executed-local-police-after-attempting-escape-following-in



89. Post 12854870 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: shmadz on November 02, 2015, 03:34:08 AM
Whole world is going to shit.

Enjoy it while it lasts.

Yea, that's good.  We don't have to pump Bitcoin, that's way too much effort, all we have to do is implode our own economies.  Just Mitt Romney the fuck out of everything.  Then we just walk to the Bitcoin store and exchange for a sack full of money like this:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1150751.0



90. Post 12859003 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):




91. Post 12862776 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Anyone still wanna short?

Incoming $163,000,000,000 market cap and $7700 coins

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1235466.0



92. Post 12862916 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 02, 2015, 10:14:43 PM
Do you have a better explanation?  I don't see any news or rumor that could explain it.

I just posted the explanation Stolfinator.  When something like 70% of coins have been mined, price has already hit the bottom as evidenced from the last year, and the upside potential is listed below, we haven't witnessed anything close to a bubble yet:

Incoming $163,000,000,000 market cap and $7700 coins

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1235466.0



93. Post 12863097 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 02, 2015, 10:42:26 PM
Well, six months ago 68% of the coins were already mined.  Why wasn't the price ~$340 back then?  

Didn't investor know then that, within six months, 70% of the coins would be mined?

Easy, because everyone wants to buy "at the bottom", so the bottom comes and sits there for an entire year while they look at the screen and say, "hmm seems pretty stable here, looks like the bottom is in, but I think i'll wait and see if there's a flash crash, then I'll buy some then".  Then the train starts to leave without them and they realize they're a fucking idiot.

That and shorters are good at keeping the price from moving...until they fail and lose everything:






94. Post 12863551 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: YourMother on November 02, 2015, 11:40:08 PM
The same bullshit over and over again, recycled to infinite by these short-minded delusional man childs in this thread. Bitcoin goes up 10-20-30 percent and immediately you get to see the imbecility unfolding for the x'th time.

Anyways, have fun dreaming about your retirement years, those luxury cars and the houses by the beach. We will talk again at 250$. It shouldn't take long.

Damn, your short got fucked up son.




95. Post 12863889 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: !! pop on November 03, 2015, 12:19:33 AM
And yet every bit-coiner is euphoric because suddenly his magical BTCeans can buy them ~20% more real money.
Undecided

You thought you'd have so much fun out shortin with your bros
But beneath the water awaits a terror nobody knows
You're dragged beneath by it's row of teeth
The bull shark
It's too late now it's made it's mark
The bull shark
Humans are helpless to this mighty beast
Claiming its prey
helpless in the water
a human buffet





96. Post 12865017 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: dragonseer on November 03, 2015, 03:23:12 AM
Just sold @366 USD where are the rest of the profit takers I want to buy back for less dammit  Angry

Damn son, where are your balls.  What are you for halloween, a bitch?




97. Post 12865056 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: natewelt on November 03, 2015, 03:52:55 AM
Just sold @366 USD where are the rest of the profit takers I want to buy back for less dammit  Angry

Damn son, where are your balls.  What are you for halloween, a bitch?




Haha seriously! Sell when the trend appears to be ending...don't get scared and sell right as things start poppin. Don't try and time the top.

Probably not gonna be a crash.  Probably going to be a soft landing to entrap the shorters and force them to support price.



98. Post 12868662 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: pleaseexplainagain on November 03, 2015, 12:24:48 PM
yes and then no
yes - we have been going up in the past few days at first 1-2% per day then 3-4% now 10%.
this is not being driven by any real news but by ourselves just punting it up so it may well gone on for a while at even higher % increases
so yes we may well go to $500, $700 or $1000.

but then at some point we will collectively loose our nerve and be down to $200 ish in a few months after the ath.

its what happened when we hopped on the willy bot train and it will happen here again.

and long before willy bot there was a period when we rocketed to $31 and crashed to $2.

rinse and repeat

Nice try you bitch ass shorters!

http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/03/bitcoin-to-be-6th-largest-reserve-currency-by-2030-research.html



99. Post 12870150 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: dragonseer on November 03, 2015, 03:01:27 PM
Before we all get too excited at this price pump, there might be something shady happening right now.

I have had Bitcoin withdrawals stuck on Cryptsy for several hours now.

What the hell does Cryptsy have to do with Bitcoin price?  It's an altcoin exchange.  Anyone who deals with altcoins has known for months not to deposit anything there.  If they ran off with all the altcoins in the universe it's not going to have any effect on BTC.  Current, past, and future BTC price has nothing to do with Cryptsy.

China spread will likely also continue because:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1235466.msg12870013#msg12870013



100. Post 12871593 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: Feri22 on November 03, 2015, 05:08:10 PM
whales who decide about price could just say "ok, now we go up"

Quote from: r0ach on October 31, 2015, 12:02:39 PM




101. Post 12872786 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: AmazonStuff on November 03, 2015, 06:19:52 PM
I haven't been around btc for a while, can someone tell is there a particular reason why we are going up?

Something happened?

Please, refrain yourself from telling that demand is bigger than supply Cheesy I'm interested only if there are some significant news. Thank you friends! Cheesy

There's about a million reasons coming together at once, it's the perfect storm.

The New World Order has decided to front run Bitcoin to make money themselves instead of try and ban it, so they've legally made it a currency in the EU, placed it on the cover of The Economist and Bloomberg in the same month, and now said it's going to be a world reserve currency:

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bitcoin-become-sixth-largest-global-reserve-currency-by-2030-1526925

Then we have deutsche bank possibly collapsing, and China shooting bankers in the streets now and having Bernie Madoff style funds imploding, so tons of China money is flowing in.  China might be on the verge of a serious economic implosion that we highly underestimate:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-11-01/partner-chinas-carl-icahn-executed-local-police-after-attempting-escape-following-in

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-11-02/widening-probe-snags-most-senior-chinese-banker-yet-sends-stocks-lower-rba-sparks-co

Then you have the halving coming and tons of other things going on at once.  Then the fact that TONS of people were sitting out of Bitcoin waiting for "the bottom".  Now that they know the bottom is already in, everyone is having to buy back when it started to go up.

You also have the fact that whales have planned all along to accumulate, wait till 70% of coins are mined, then start to pump.




102. Post 12873401 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Next O'Reily Factor:




103. Post 12873507 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

In case people don't know how the market works:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0akBdQa55b4



104. Post 12873955 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

China already recovered at $417, just the Huobi API is fucked up



105. Post 12874095 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

In case anyone is retarded and can't figure it out, China is currently 2652 yuan ($418 USD).  Huobi API is screwed up.  America lagging behind because the API froze.



106. Post 12875005 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: Omikifuse on November 03, 2015, 10:12:51 PM
I see a dump to 375 followed by a quick recover.

For a moment I thought was game over and and were on top, but this is more solid than I thought

Will take something like 30 years for a new generation of shorters to arrive since all the existing ones are broke and homeless now.



107. Post 12880249 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: YourMother on November 04, 2015, 10:13:55 AM
Try harder, please

Quote from: r0ach on November 04, 2015, 10:20:11 AM
Sell your car, take out student loans, borrow money from your girlfriend, pawn the title of her car, sell your fillings, then buy bitcoin.



108. Post 12880784 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Apparently Andreas Antonopolous wasn't actually walking around stoned babbling about nonsense.  Bitcoin really is the black swan that separates money creation and the state, like how religion and state were separated...



109. Post 12881107 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Wait till it breaks old ATH of around $1200.  Little countries like Venezuela have $15 billion dollars in gold reserve, more than double Bitcoin's market cap.  After it breaks old ATH, the central banker FOMO begins where they start saying "holee shit mates, do we need to be buying some of this stuff???", which then leads to the unstoppable bubble of all bubbles.  You basically get a free 10x+ from there after breaking old ATH.



110. Post 12881461 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):




111. Post 12881915 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Fuck you guys, in the time it took me to make this picture it already went to $515 in China

Quote from: r0ach on November 04, 2015, 12:26:39 PM




112. Post 12883261 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on November 04, 2015, 02:00:35 PM
You are using logic that you will forever regret.... just when exactly do all the indicators tell all the smart people that now is the time to buy to get 1000% returns. IT DOESN'T HAPPEN LIKE THAT. This ship will sale and leave everyone standing on the shore wonder what dafuq just happened.

While everyone was "waiting for the bottom", "waiting for a flash crash", here is what Bitcoin was doing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF4ZTcuhixc



113. Post 12883399 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 04, 2015, 02:43:27 PM
There are only 14 million BTC out there, so if there were 15 million bitcoiners the average bitcoiner would have less than 1 BTC.  Since the distribution is highly skewed, most of those "bitcoiners" would have to own only 0.01 BTC or less.

There are only ~150'000 transactions issued per day, or ~4.5 million per month. If we count as bitcoiners only those people who issue a transaction at least once a month, there cannot be more than 4.5 million.  Again, most of the transactions are generated by a small number of users, so the number of bitcoiners is probably less than 450'000.

Wences is one of the worst snake bit-oil peddlers out there.  By talking about "1,000,000 $/BTC" as if it were an almost sure thing, he has definitely left the "salesman" land and crossed into "scam" territory.

Stolfi, you know damn well what you're typing IS snake oil.  Off-chain transactions (i.e. exchanges and other such services) probably make up a far higher percent of volume than on-chain transactions.  Nothing about Bitcoin being a preservation of wealth tool requires you to mindlessly send it back and forth to yourself all day long.  Bitcoin's current state lends itself to functioning best as a checkbook type device you use to occasionally buy large value items like cars and houses.



114. Post 12886905 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

So many noobs will sell everything on a 6% drop and miss bubble 2.0 with 1/10th of what they could have lol.  Sell away noobs.



115. Post 12886966 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: nor9865 on November 04, 2015, 07:50:52 PM
So many noobs will sell everything on a 6% drop and miss bubble 2.0 with 1/10th of what they could have lol.  Sell away noobs.

if all the noobs sell like you say, the price will hit the deepest bottom since gox

Bitcoin doesn't give a fuck.  You can sell everything, slam your penis in the car door a few times, it doesn't really matter.  This is Bitcoin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF4ZTcuhixc



116. Post 12887050 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Price is being managed in China at a 500 floor till the round eye is over his fear to go higher.



117. Post 12887116 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

I just checked all the exchange walls, it's either going to hold this price or up some more.  Only logical option is hodl.



118. Post 12889252 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

So many noob shorters and noob 20x longs taking it up the ass this day.  Never have I seen such poor risk management.  Now China is going right back up again.



119. Post 12893577 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: gentlemand on November 05, 2015, 10:40:37 AM
No. Registration was closed a few days ago. The bidding is between 9 and 3 or 5 EST today. They must be a little bit stumped as to where to place those bids.

Not that dangerous with a $375 triple bottom.  Should be back over $400 soon.  If I was going to make a prediction of where it will test next, I'd just split the difference in the 375 bottom and the 450 that didn't hold and say around $415.  From there, maybe the Chinese will take us up again.  All I know is, it's way more risky to short than buy right now.



120. Post 12893765 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

China triple bottom is in.  I don't think you're getting coins cheaper than this.  Rally probably resumes from here:




121. Post 12894229 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Will test $415 next, the dumb shorters in the US are trying to push it down to avoid closing while China wants to go up.   Could drag on for a couple days or maybe they'll close today.



122. Post 12894323 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

<r0ach> china is going into an ultra tight manipulated trading range
<r0ach> only the US can bring it down
<r0ach> china wants to go up

As the shorts close and people wander in over the next several days who were full fiat and got left behind, it's going up. 



123. Post 12894631 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

$404 told you guys to buy the China triple bottom

Quote from: PseudoCode on November 05, 2015, 01:07:37 PM
KwukDuck, trying to piss on the BitCoin Butterfly once again.





124. Post 12894950 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: yolalanda on November 05, 2015, 02:19:40 PM
Sure, boredom, but now with pepper...

Did you sell all coins at $2  or were they all on Gox



125. Post 12895431 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on November 05, 2015, 03:11:11 PM
Another question why was the price stale for so many months and then all of a sudden it goes ape shit??

I decided to raise the price



126. Post 12895492 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on November 05, 2015, 03:22:34 PM
I think (based on nothing but my own gut feeling) we will most likely stabilise at $300.

You are correct, all the stupid fucks that didn't buy at the bottom around $230 hope it will go to $300.  Will it go there?  No.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0akBdQa55b4



127. Post 12895541 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: InvestorPerson on November 05, 2015, 03:27:25 PM
I think (based on nothing but my own gut feeling) we will most likely stabilise at $300.

Anyone else want to have a guess what we will stabilise at, or if we stabilise at all!

will take a while, but end there. add some more panic and dumps and it's sub 300 again

Yes, we are aware you did not buy at the bottom and have spammed the last 10 posts claiming the price is going to 1 penny so that you can buy.

No pity for the idiots that think they can manipulate the market down by talking because they were too dumb to hold any and went full fiat.



128. Post 12895576 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: InvestorPerson on November 05, 2015, 03:32:15 PM
I think (based on nothing but my own gut feeling) we will most likely stabilise at $300.

Anyone else want to have a guess what we will stabilise at, or if we stabilise at all!

will take a while, but end there. add some more panic and dumps and it's sub 300 again

Yes, we are aware you did not buy at the bottom and have spammed the last 10 posts claiming the price is going to 1 penny so that you can buy.

No pity for the idiots that think they can manipulate the market down by talking because they were too dumb to hold any and went full fiat.

hey just speculating here  Grin seen too many pump n dumps, this is no different.

you must have some heavy bags, still time to pass them to the next bull for a good price

Nope, was buying the entire bear market season.  That's why nobody cares to read what a bunch of Johnny come lately dbags post chanting for the price to go down so they can send their $100 to coinbase to get some because they were too dumb to buy at $230 and went full fiat.



129. Post 12896263 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Have enough noobs been shaken out that we can go higher now?



130. Post 12897608 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

behold, the power of r0achstradamus (that was at 390)

Quote from: r0ach on November 05, 2015, 01:12:43 PM
Will test $415 next



131. Post 12897641 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 30, 2015, 08:45:01 AM
The price does seem to grow exponentially

Quote from: r0ach on October 29, 2015, 08:36:22 PM
Breaking News:  China has declared war on fiat!






132. Post 12898304 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: NSA360 on November 05, 2015, 08:16:12 PM

Find the differences
Nice job leaving out the gox bubble.  Another day of little children posting thinking they can talk the price down because they went full fiat at $230 instead of buying at $230?



133. Post 12910711 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Tired of looking at crappy line drawing that shows absolutely nothing, so here's what I see as the best altcoin trader in the universe.  So in other words, a trading range of 360 - 415.  Take the bottom of 360, add it to the point where resistance started to increase of 415, divide it by two = average of 387.5, exactly where the price is.  With a continous uptrend unless it breaks below 360.



Called the 415 before it went there while it was at 370 or so in the 2nd wave blowoff too:

Quote from: r0ach on November 05, 2015, 01:12:43 PM
Will test $415 next



134. Post 12910900 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on November 07, 2015, 01:26:23 PM
Sub 20mil$ in longs on Bitfinex! Yet we continue to go up and there is really a lot of money on Bitfinex waiting to get used for longs  Wink I guess maybe a push to 400$ is in.

Probably because Bitcoin is currently safer than leaving your money in a bank.  Instead of negative interest rates, you'll probably gain 50% or more off current price from halving.



135. Post 12911328 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on November 07, 2015, 01:58:23 PM
Tired of looking at crappy line drawing that shows absolutely nothing, so here's what I see as the best altcoin trader in the universe.  So in other words, a trading range of 360 - 415.  Take the bottom of 360, add it to the top resistance point of 415, divide it by two = average of 387.5, exactly where the price is.



Called the 415 before it went there while it was at 370 or so in the 2nd wave blowoff too:

Will test $415 next

What's your next call?

Fundamentals always take precedent over short term TA, so conservatively, a gradual uptrend to $600 or higher by August 2016 with next leg up of support probably being $420 unless some whales decide to go wild to spike the market.  As OTC supply runs out, whales have to hit the exchange so all TA can instantly be thrown out the window as price goes parabolic again.  It could always be some astronomical number by that point too but you gotta invest with conservative estimates and hope for the best.

When 70% has already been mined, it can really go exponential at any moment and I would not want to be holding 0:  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1235466.0

Could happen before or after next halving but we'll see another parabolic and it will come without warning just like this last one that occurred.  Whales start making whale sounds and other whales come to investigate.



136. Post 12912015 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Would need to go below 360 to break the uptrend.  I doubt it will.  Anything between 375 and 415 looks normal to me over the next week or two.



137. Post 12912253 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: phishead on November 07, 2015, 04:05:47 PM
Are we still in bull trap mode? Or what do you think the next general trend is?

Better question is, when, if ever, is the China/US $15-20 spread going to end.



138. Post 12912272 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: TReano on November 07, 2015, 04:08:50 PM
the clearer a trend becomes the more likely it gets that the trend will end...


If it would be that easy to simply buy into something because it goes up trading wouldn't work. If you buy there is always somebody betting on the other side of your trade.

I think your statement has been invalidated by both BTC and LTC halvings.



139. Post 12912363 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Watching China, appears to be a Chinaman that shorted and then put up big sell walls to try and make his short work.



140. Post 12912407 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: Tstar on November 07, 2015, 04:23:09 PM
Are we still in bull trap mode? Or what do you think the next general trend is?

Better question is, when, if ever, is the China/US $15-20 spread going to end.

I'm asking this since the dump stopped. Why is there so much difference? And yes is it going to last or not?
I don't like to know there's too much spread between China and USa/EU. That's not healthy

Maybe it's part of the new norm.  As certain nations get in more economic trouble, maybe BTC will always carry a price premium in some places.  If a large economy such as Russia collapsed for instance, what do you imagine the BTC price premium over America would be?  Anybody know what the premium is for BTC in Venezuela right now?  People seem to think it's normal and perfectly ok for Venezuela to have a price premium but think it's strange for China to.



141. Post 12913137 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: TReano on November 07, 2015, 05:01:41 PM
Edit: If you want to make money in Bitcoin or even in the stock market. Wait for a trend to develop and trade off of it in the same direction. Don't try and time the end of bear trends or bull trends.

If you bet the same amount of money each time and take your emotions out of the picture you should be able to win more than you lose and make money overall.
It's a solid strategy, but makes more sense trading the common stuff like EUR/USD. With Bitcoin there's just too many variables that can change the direction fast.


the clearer a trend becomes the more likely it gets that the trend will end...



If it would be that easy to simply buy into something because it goes up trading wouldn't work. If you buy there is always somebody betting on the other side of your trade.

I disagree, but that's what makes a market.

I do buy high sell higher rather than buy low sell high and it's worked for me for years.

The more simple your strategy and the lower number of trades you make the more money you make IMO.


What I mean is, you always buy it from somebody who thinks the price will go in his way... it doesn't mean he has to short it all the way up but still...

Some people here think trading overall is easy just because they were lucky a few times... it's not about being right all the time it's about being consistence in your decisions and not about being right all the time because that is impossible..

In the end it doesn't matter if the price goes up or down. That's what most people here will never understand when trading... Buy and Pray is not a good trading tactic long or short term..

You completely left out the reason for why trading really can be easy and free money, because there's always a huge amount of people seeking short term profits.  You just exploit that weakness.  It's why pawn shops exist.  They're willing to hold something longer than 5 minutes to sell higher later.  Even if 99% of people think Bitcoin is going to be worth $10,000 in 2020, it's still going to sell for peanuts now because we're not there yet and they need money now.



142. Post 12914745 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 07, 2015, 02:45:39 PM
Once we get to 600 and then see the first weekly red candle, then the mini-rally is over.




143. Post 12920858 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 08, 2015, 03:18:24 PM
remarkable how the coins were bought at the first sign of a dump and then price promptly went back >380.

Just a normal day of Bitstamp trying to manipulate the price downwards like every other day for the last several years.  Looks like they can't do it anymore though.



144. Post 12922760 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.32h):

Quote from: Hyperjacked on November 08, 2015, 07:36:33 PM
look it's the weekend and Blythe Masters is enjoying a nice day walking the dogs in Central Park...

The gods have decided the uptrend will continue.




145. Post 12925376 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Unfortunately for the bears, I think people are just going to trade the trend line creating a self fulfilling prophecy of $365ish:




146. Post 12929050 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

The people who sold at $2....$230....$365




147. Post 12930598 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

The price seems to want to gravitate towards a $362 floor or so.  That extra $20 seems to be scaring away new buyers heh.  Maybe it will stop around $370 though.



148. Post 12930727 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Here's what I see looking at the chart and trend right now.  Removing outlier data on the bottoms and just going by solid averages, you get these three yuan values, divide them by 3, subtract the $15 spread = $362 current working floor.  If that floor fails to hold, then it's going to fall back on 2250 yuan floor = $355 minus $15 China spread = $340.  For anyone dreaming of $300 coins, I don't foresee it going lower than $340 and it might not even breach $362 again.




149. Post 12930985 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

I expect a red china candle to 2400 yuan any second, which will take the US to $362-365ish.



150. Post 12931769 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):




151. Post 12931912 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Woops, left out the macro wedge.  Looks like it's going to explode in one direction or another once the yellow wedge finishes.








152. Post 12932226 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on November 09, 2015, 07:37:06 PM


Not me. I'll be ON A BOAT!!!

Monohull or catamaran



153. Post 12932274 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

This is it, which way are we going ladies:




154. Post 12932380 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

We're coming in at the end of a micro and macro wedge + volume is now 0, means large chance of big red candle unless some China whale decides to flood the market with volume:




155. Post 12932835 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Ab-Soul on November 09, 2015, 09:28:41 PM
I see market is bullish, forum is bullish, I hope we won't see any reverse trend. I'm %100 in Bitcoin right now.

It's still bullish, it's just the China spread + uncertainity of where the price is going to land after the big rise has everyone scared of where it's safe to buy at.  Probably take one week before things are worked out.



156. Post 12933257 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

China rally is re-started, might be a huge breakout coming:






157. Post 12933748 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: MatTheCat on November 10, 2015, 12:15:43 AM
There goes Bear Whale on Stamp....

All the other exchanges are wanting to head up...but nope....

Edit: And I bet that BTC will not breach the recent $360 bottom, and I bet it will rise back up, but not breach the $388.

Market being held in stasis, quite intetionally, it seems.

Yea, looked like Bernanke needed to stop that China rally.



158. Post 12933779 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on November 10, 2015, 12:26:01 AM
Multiple winning bidders of USMS aution all win with bids considerably under spot.

And where's the evidence of how much they paid?



159. Post 12938129 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

r0achstradamus strikes again:

Quote from: r0ach on November 09, 2015, 05:20:59 PM
I expect a red china candle to 2400 yuan any second, which will take the US to $362-365ish.

Quote from: r0ach on November 09, 2015, 04:33:05 PM
The price seems to want to gravitate towards a $362 floor or so.  That extra $20 seems to be scaring away new buyers heh.

$362 = the floor.  It will probably hold here, but even if it breaks, it's only going to $340-350ish, so pretty safe to buy now.  Buy now and don't look at price again for 1 year.



160. Post 12938182 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on November 10, 2015, 01:56:06 PM
Difference between China and the west is down to $5.

Yea, that spread had to consolidate closer before the real floor was found.



161. Post 12938277 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: barbs on November 10, 2015, 02:04:09 PM
I just want to say there is no way this is going any lower

Yea, whenever you see some guy market dumping 1000 coins at once, it's oversold and the bottom is reached.  China is lower than the US now, so this is definitely the bottom.

edit: nevermind, they were lower for like 10 seconds.



162. Post 12938395 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: Hunyadi on November 10, 2015, 02:11:48 PM
Shorts are piling in (@Finex). How much do we need for the potential up move?

What kind of idiot would short after that massive sell off? lol



163. Post 12938423 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Crash over, China going green.



164. Post 12941774 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on November 10, 2015, 09:11:59 PM
So auction coins never get dumped for a quick profit, huh? 


Pick one:

A)  China stopped pushing for new highs

B)  Auction coins dumped

C)  Final shakeout before $1million per coin



165. Post 12942333 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Someone review my "Lowball Bitcoin price prediction as a money transmitter in comparison to Paypal" thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1243623.0



166. Post 12942378 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Definitely last shakeout till $1million/coin.



167. Post 12942485 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

I wonder if MattTheCat dumped when he can just hodl them for 8 months and have probably double the value of what he paid.



168. Post 12958584 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: makeacake on November 12, 2015, 06:36:56 PM
If you insist on you government wasting resources like Bitcoin does, I'll see what can be done about raising the cost of printing $100 bill to $99, bitcoin-stylee.

So many damn fools try to equate the distribution process of Bitcoin as being the cost per transaction.  Your fail premise might work if the block reward was linear.



169. Post 12968817 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.33h):

Quote from: bobabouey2 on November 14, 2015, 12:22:35 AM

Terrorism rally?

$4 terror bump



170. Post 12981094 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

You don't win at BTC by day trading.  You figure out that 8 months from now, the price will be at least $500-600 from halving and try to have as many as you can by the day that happens.



171. Post 12982268 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Oh look, 10 one star account posts in a row all from the same paid-for shill saying Bitcoin is going to 0.  Cointelpro/Mossad is way dumber than I thought.  When you post with more shill accounts than actual forum users, all you do is blow your own cover.  Way to go idiots.



172. Post 12988896 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: ynef on November 16, 2015, 02:15:45 PM
Haven't been monitoring this forum for a week or so, but I just wanted to say that I have a feeling we're going to see some bulls once more. This time from Japan. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34829408

I thought it was amusing Japan expanded their "lost decade" to actually be two decades, but still call it lost decade anyway.



173. Post 12997668 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: MatTheCat on November 17, 2015, 01:08:01 PM
If you are a whale wanting to manipulate a market




174. Post 13005775 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 18, 2015, 05:39:49 AM
Yet racism continues to be deeply rooted in the "standard American mindset", as betrayed by the "race" field in forms.

Who would have thought Stolfi would be an ivory tower Marxist?  Probably everyone?

Race is a real and not imaginary construct.  There were seven main haplogroups in Africa, L0-L6.  L3 split into haplogroup M & N.  N being the precursor to caucasians, and M being the precursor to everything else not African.  The amount of time that haplogroup M+N have been separated from L is something like 100,000 years.  It's not a question of "do races exist", or "are races different", it's only a question of how large of changes can occur in that time span.



That's only a conservative estimate of genetic isolation though.  In America, plenty of Caucasian and Africans live near each other, yet the interbreeding between groups is something miniscule under 5%.  Since white genes are recessive, the white race would not exist if this ratio was higher.  Due to this, whether your Marxist mind acknowledges it or not, if you advocate that everyone on earth interbreed with each other with no regards to race, you are in fact advocating white genocide due to white genes (and Asian) being recessive.

It's pretty easy to verify this with virtually any interracial relationship that exists.  Take Heidi Klum for example.  Here's her with two of her kids, each from different fathers.  She's supposed to be a supermodel, yet has passed along virtually none of those supermodel genes onto one child, while clearly having done so for the other.  This is because white genes are recessive and it's hard to even tell the child on the left is related to her at all.  



When people like Richard Dawkins use terminology like "the selfish gene" to describe how and why organisms reproduce, in the example above, you're effectively throwing your genes out the window, accomplishing nothing, and effectively eliminating yourself from the gene pool due to your genes being recessive.  This is one of the big reasons why intermarriage rate remains low.  Even if they don't understand the science behind it, people subconsciously know this and instinctively avoid it so as to not purposely erase their lineage from history.



175. Post 13005898 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on November 18, 2015, 04:02:58 PM
r0ach, It would be beneficial to flick through primary school science books from time to time.
What you're describing are ethnic groups, not races. For the umpteenth time, there are no human groups different enough to be labelled as race.

This is a bullshit, meaningless, semantics argument.  The terminology used in Mainstream Science on Intelligence is "racial-ethnic group", so it still has the word "race" in it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intelligence

I used the word "race" because that is what's known to describe this concept in colloquial speech.



176. Post 13006062 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on November 18, 2015, 04:15:45 PM
I used the word "race" because that is what's known to describe this concept in colloquial speech.

That's exactly the point. If you wish to make biological arguments you must use biological terms.

Language is an evolving mechanism of consensus.  If 99% or more of people on earth refer to this idea as "race", and it already seems to be accepted as such in dictionaries, and a much smaller portion refer to it as "ethnic group", colloquial speech will determine what is valid in the future unless some type of major scientific discovery invalidates it's use.

From the dictionary:

Race -  A usually geographically isolated population of organisms that differs from other populations of the same species in certain heritable traits

Biologists/Taxonomists also play fast and loose with classification of species in animals they discover, and if they practiced those same habits classifying humans, they would probably end up classifying humans into different species.  In other words, your argument is meaningless semantics.



177. Post 13006147 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Oblodo on November 18, 2015, 04:31:55 PM
Yet racism continues to be deeply rooted in the "standard American mindset", as betrayed by the "race" field in forms.

Who would have thought Stolfi would be an ivory tower Marxist?  Probably everyone?

Race is a real and not imaginary construct.  There were seven main haplogroups in Africa, L0-L6.  L3 split into haplogroup M & N.  N being the precursor to caucasians, and M being the precursor to everything else not African.  The amount of time that haplogroup M+N have been separated from L is something like 100,000 years.  It's not a question of "do races exist", or "are races different", it's only a question of how large of changes can occur in that time span.



That's only a conservative estimate of genetic isolation though.  In America, plenty of Caucasian and Africans live near each other, yet the interbreeding between groups is something miniscule under 5%.  Since white genes are recessive, the white race would not exist if this ratio was higher.  Due to this, whether your Marxist mind acknowledges it or not, if you advocate that everyone on earth interbreed with each other with no regards to race, you are in fact advocating white genocide due to white genes (and Asian) being recessive.

It's pretty easy to verify this with virtually any interracial relationship that exists.  Take Heidi Klum for example.  Here's her with two of her kids, each from different fathers.  She's supposed to be a supermodel, yet has passed along virtually none of those supermodel genes onto one child, while clearly having done so for the other.  This is because white genes are recessive and it's hard to even tell the child on the left is related to her at all.  



When people like Richard Dawkins use terminology like "the selfish gene" to describe how and why organisms reproduce, in the example above, you're effectively throwing your genes out the window, accomplishing nothing, and effectively eliminating yourself from the gene pool due to your genes being recessive.  This is one of the big reasons why intermarriage rate remains low.  Even if they don't understand the science behind it, people subconsciously know this and instinctively avoid it so as to not purposely erase their lineage from history.



I do not think you should use stormfront.org as a source of science. If you ever paid intuition anywhere, ask for your money back.

Sorry, but mindlessly throwing out the term "Stormfront" in an attempt to insult someone who has never looked at that website before does not invalidate the objective reality of what I've typed.  You'll have to actually address the subject of what I've typed instead of using fake strawman tactics.



178. Post 13006205 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: bzfawwituszfawwer on November 18, 2015, 04:42:17 PM
blah blah bullshit from lambchops 5000th anti-bitcoin spam account

So now mentioning that white and asian genes are recessive is racist?  Maybe Bitcoin is racist too?  Maybe everything is racist?



179. Post 13006371 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: bitukptvcser on November 18, 2015, 04:52:58 PM
Not sure about dominant/recessive genes, frankly don't give a flying fuck. What I do give a fuck about is the pitch-black ignorant pasty faggots who obsess about shit like racial purity.
As far as Bitcoin being racist? Not sure what you mean. Appears that plenty of bitcoiners sure are Smiley

Thank you for giving away the origin of your anti-Bitcoin spam accounts "lambchop / 5000 other fake aliases".  Pushing a constant anti-Bitcoin, pro-fiat agenda, while also being vehemently pro-cultural Marxism.  I was starting to believe someone like the Russian government was funding anti-Bitcoin spammers, but this is obviously not the case.  Very few groups on earth fit the profile you put out, especially ones that become enraged by their cultural marxist views being challenged.  It's easy to tell where these spam accounts are originating from and being funded by now.

Quote from: Oblodo on November 18, 2015, 04:59:21 PM
And please stop using a bitcoin forum to spew out hate...

Claiming that mentioning Caucasian and Asian genes are recessive is "spewing hate" is a complete joke.  You're trying to use strawman tactics and political correctness as a basis to win arguments.  The person "spewing hate" is actually you because you're claiming anyone arguing from a non-minority viewpoint is automatically wrong and racist by default.  You are the true biased racist and it's disgusting.



180. Post 13006480 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: bitukptvcser on November 18, 2015, 05:11:44 PM
Not sure about dominant/recessive genes, frankly don't give a flying fuck. What I do give a fuck about is the pitch-black ignorant pasty faggots who obsess about shit like racial purity.
As far as Bitcoin being racist? Not sure what you mean. Appears that plenty of bitcoiners sure are Smiley

Thank you for giving away the origin of your anti-Bitcoin spam accounts "lambchop / 5000 other fake aliases".  Pushing a constant anti-Bitcoin, pro-fiat agenda, while also being vehemently pro-cultural Marxism.  I was starting to believe someone like the Russian government was funding anti-Bitcoin spammers, but this is obviously not the case.  Very few groups on earth fit the profile you put out, especially ones that become enraged by their cultural marxist views being challenged.  It's easy to tell where these spam accounts are originating from and being funded by now.

I'm not anti-bitcoin. I'm anti ignorant, angry faggots like you, who use words they don't understand to prop up their idiotic, paranoid world views.
You see conspiracies and plots everywhere, because it's the only way for you to explain how you came to be such a fucking failure, without having to acknowledge the obvious, begging answer: because you fucking suck Smiley

Once again, thank you for revealing the source and funding of your 5000 paid anti-Bitcoin spam accounts "lambchop/other aliases".  Besides the pro-fiat, anti-bitcoin stance, the part where you become enraged by people not accepting domination by cultural Marxism was key in figuring it out.



181. Post 13006935 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: bitukptvcser on November 18, 2015, 05:24:44 PM
Give me a hint, who's paying me, you crazy paranoid fuck?

Thank you for revealing the source and funding of your 5000 paid, anti-Bitcoin, spam accounts, "lambchop/other aliases".  Besides the pro-fiat, anti-bitcoin stance, the part where you become enraged by people not accepting domination by cultural Marxism was key in figuring it out.

You now get this copy and paste message for each time you create a new spam account.  Pretty easy for viewers to figure out where these spam accounts come from now given this information.  Very very few groups on the planet push this specific brand of propaganda that you are doing.  You've completely given away your identity.





182. Post 13007404 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 18, 2015, 07:03:20 PM
Between the sociopathic trolls and paranoid tinfoils, I am starting to wonder why I hang around here.

I've noticed lots of people refer to the entity that's created 5000+ anti-bitcoin, pro-fiat, pro-cultural Marxism spam accounts as a "troll".  You need to be extremely stupid to believe such a thing.  It's obviously a paid for shill.  Nobody goes through such effort in creating so many spam accounts for no actual incentive.

Thankfully for our viewers, his uncontrollable rage at people not worshipping cultural Marxism, plus his praise of fiat and anti-Bitcoin view have completely given away the identity of the group funding this.




183. Post 13007946 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 18, 2015, 07:28:27 PM

What the fuck are 'supermodel genes'?  So you think the white kid is pretty and the other isn't.  That is totally subjective.

Contrary to what fat pride and other whacko groups try to claim, "beauty" is not even close to entirely subjective.  Symmetry and attributes that define health are obvious objective standards of looks, probably plenty more exist.  I hate to break it to you, but the world in general will unanimously agree which child received the supermodel genes and which didn't.

Since the Caucasian genes are recessive, this is how it turns out nearly every single time in these kinds of offspring, the child looks nothing like the white parent.  From a strict biological and natural selection point of view, the purpose of reproduction is solely to spread your genes into the future.  In the scenario above, what she has done is basically pass on her genes as non-influential junk DNA, while the African genes determined almost the entire outcome of the child where it doesn't resemble one of the parents at all.

Of course there will be tons of Marxists coming along to claim that mentioning African genes are dominant and Caucasian and Asian genes are recessive is "da raycism", because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that whatever genes compromise the recessive groups would basically be made extinct by full integration between all groups.  This infuriates the common Marxist because it blows the lid off their fake narrative where those groups of people tend to constantly push for things like conservation of variety in animal species, yet they would be pushing for the exact opposite in this case, the extinction of the recessive human groups on purpose.



184. Post 13008078 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Divitiae miserae on November 18, 2015, 08:39:31 PM
I subscribe everything you said. The real solution would be eradicating relics which should be consigned to the dustbin of history: namely fanaticism and religion (any religion) through reason, but this is my very own point of view and far less likely.

Humans are regular animals.  Dogs bark at themselves in the mirror for no reason.  Some people do similar things.  The ones who try to classify humans as some type of creature far above the scope of the common animal will be the first to die once the fractional reserve, fiat scam system implodes.  In the words of The Watchmen movie, "Now the whole world stands on the brink staring down into bloody hell. All those liberals, and intellectuals, and smooth-talkers; and all of a sudden no one can think of anything to say."




185. Post 13008189 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: controltower on November 18, 2015, 08:58:31 PM
Nah, won't be like that at all. You'll still be a bitter, angry little shit. Some black d00d will prob'ly make you his bitch, without Nanny State to protect you Smiley

Thank you for revealing the source and funding of your 5000 paid, anti-Bitcoin, spam accounts, "lambchop/other aliases".  Besides the pro-fiat, anti-bitcoin stance, the part where you become enraged by people not accepting domination by cultural Marxism was key in figuring it out.

Have fun receiving this reply anytime you make a new spam acct!



186. Post 13008481 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 18, 2015, 09:05:53 PM
That is the sort of horrible simplification that "scientific racists" must make to justify the concept of "race".

Good one, Stolfi.  You're way more fringe leftist than I imagined, trying to claim that anyone acknolwedging different ethnic groups or races exist at all is a "scientific racist".  The word "racist" isn't even a valid word in the first place because it implies everyone on earth is identical to one another.  

Read it and weep you anti-Bitcoin Marxist:  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_Science_on_Intelligence

No scientific evidence exists whatsoever to back up your points, none.  The only evidence that exists points to the opposite of what you claim, because all that matters is the bell curve, not outliers.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 18, 2015, 09:05:53 PM
(The term "Caucasian", by the way, is a relic from "scientific" racial classifications of the 19th century.)

Oh joy, now anyone filling in the word "caucasian" for race on the census is now a "19th century racist".  You are a true self hating, far leftist, anti-white racist yourself posting garbage like this.  You're not allowed to be a Caucasian because "Caucasian" is a relic, hence bad!  Nobody on earth is allowed to be different from one another.  Everyone must be identical, Marxism commands it!  Also, reject Bitcoin, worship fiat!

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 18, 2015, 09:05:53 PM
There are known natural mechanisms that allow such jumping, and they have been adapted for genetic engineering.  Again, it if such accident happens only once in a million years, that may be sufficient to transfer a gene from one to all individuals of a completely different species.)

Probably mutation + convergent evolution, which is why if life is discovered on other planets, it would likely be similar to what exists here or in the past.


Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 18, 2015, 09:05:53 PM
In cultures that did not have African slavery for many centuries, or which for some reason never adopted the "one drop rule", skin color is perceived as a continuous variable that is either irrelevant, or does not trigger discrimination at some magic level.

Please cut the slavery BS.  Brazil didn't even get rid of slavery completely until TWENTY FIVE YEARS after the emancipation proclamation in the US.  Hilarious that you would actually bring this up while trying to demonize North America.  The Roman empire also had more white slaves than black slaves ever to exist.  Anyone trying to play the slavery card is a pathetic propagandist.  The basis of the so called "one drop rule" was most likely due to white genes being recessive.

The natural order of human grouping is individual > family > tribe/village > city state of ethnocentric majority

Without an ethnocentric majority, the nation state collapses.  Every country on earth that doesn't collapse enacts similar policy, such as the Japanese attempt to regulate immigration and maintain their demographic.  The US had the same laws until Jewish lobbyists got the immigration act of 1965 thrown away.  They wanted their diaspora from all over the globe to be allowed in, and they see homogenous civilizations as a threat to their existence.  There's a reason places like China (the Han) and Japan have existed for so long, because they're mostly homogenous civilizations.  America will inevitably implode because Marxists constantly try to push the lie that "diversity is strength", when it's actually a weakness that causes social unrest and implosion.




187. Post 13008634 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: makeacake on November 18, 2015, 10:00:46 PM
spam account

Thank you for revealing the source and funding of your 5000 paid, anti-Bitcoin, spam accounts, "lambchop/other aliases".  Besides the pro-fiat, anti-bitcoin stance, the part where you become enraged by people not accepting domination by cultural Marxism was key in figuring it out.

Have fun receiving this reply anytime you make a new spam acct!




188. Post 13009100 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

If Matt and the cat sold, it will likely quadruple in price.



189. Post 13009456 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: CoinCube on November 18, 2015, 11:43:02 PM
As the father of 3 mixed children myself (wife is Asian and I am white) I have to call you out on this.

You misquoted me entirely.  I said both Caucasian and Asian genes are recessive compared to African genes.  You being white and marrying an Asian woman (wow, who would have guessed nerdy white guys obssesed with Asian women on a Bitcoin forum???) doesn't really have anything to do with what I typed.  There's plenty of half white, half asian girls that can pass for full white or full asian.  Neither group's traits completely obliterate the others making one of the participants seemingly function only as junk DNA.



190. Post 13009644 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 19, 2015, 12:12:05 AM
As the father of 3 mixed children myself (wife is Asian and I am white) I have to call you out on this.

You misquoted me entirely.  I said both Caucasian and Asian genes are recessive compared to African genes.  You being white and marrying an Asian woman (wow, who would have guessed nerdy white guys obssesed with Asian women on a Bitcoin forum???) doesn't really have anything to do with what I typed.  There's plenty of half white, half asian girls that can pass for full white or full asian.  Neither group's traits completely obliterate the others making one of the participants seemingly function only as junk DNA.


You still have no idea how recessive and dominant genes work. Maybe you should do some reading. And stop being an asshole.

No, I think you have no idea how anything works, keep trying to push your cultural Marxism though, claiming everyone that walks the earth is identical little clones.  Every group is different from both physical and behavioral aspects, because that is the purpose of evolution, to create differences, not to create Marxism.  You should really go join the fiat world where your delusional view is commonplace.



191. Post 13009738 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on November 19, 2015, 12:49:34 AM
NO! Gawd  Sad

If every race is identical, why do races outside of Africa have Neanderthal DNA?  Why do blacks have 20% higher blood testosterone level?  Why do Asians seem to test lowest for psychopathic character traits?  Even men and women from the same ethnic group aren't similar.  Claiming people from different groups are identical is just hilarious.

It's always the far leftists pulling this crap too.  A bias to support their ideology of collectivism.  Nevermind the fact that liberalism is inherently a mental disorder based on inferiority complex where you can only relate with groups deemed weak, inferior, or underdogs in general.  It's a shame the political and social narative of the modern world is shaped entirely by people with mental disorders.



192. Post 13009793 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: controltower on November 19, 2015, 01:14:26 AM
... It's a shame the political and social narative of the modern world is shaped entirely by people with mental disorders.
*narrative
How is it that these mentally deficient inferior mongrel weaklings triumphed over your clearly superior [for a c0ckr0ach] genetic stock Huh

Probably the same reason the least useful members of civilization:  sports players, actors, hedge fund managers, make a million times more than people who produce food, clothing and shelter.

Quote from: ImI on November 19, 2015, 01:16:00 AM
oh, yes there are differences. just like there are differences between you and your neighbor there are also differences between you and some asian guy.

you know whats funny though? racist scumbags usually ignore one very important issue. kids of interracial couples are healthier than kids of couples from same origin! its basic genetics. nature uses the pool of genes to "build" the new human being. in interracial couples it has a wider rage of different genes to choose from and is therefore able to eliminate genetic defects and disorders far better than same "race" couples.

You know what's more funny?  When Marxists try to push the agenda that everyone walking the earth is identical, then when caught out in an obvious lie, they try to claim that ok, you are right, but anyone that mentions it is a "racist scumbag".  No, you are the scumbag for trying to push collectivism on people then using the politically correct strawman fallacy of "raycism" when caught in lies.




193. Post 13009876 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on November 19, 2015, 01:35:05 AM
I don't think the words he is using mean what he thinks they mean.

I don't think you understand the words you're using.

Cultural Marxism: an ideology which emphasizes culture as a main cause of inequalities. Critics have seen cultural Marxism and its influence as an important cause of political correctness and as an important cause of a perceived decline of humanities, social sciences, culture, and civilization in the Western world.

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on November 19, 2015, 01:24:09 AM
where do hot refugees fit into that line-up?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/life/74194603/horrendous-website-makes-light-of-refugee-crisis-by-ranking-hot-syrian-women

The leftists on this forum don't really care about truth or fiction, right or wrong, all they care about is attempting to maintain the appearance of moral high ground, thus their strategy when speaking is always to try and correlate the non-leftist opponent with either Hitler, a Klan member, or some other leftist boogeyman-ism like racism, sexism, anything-ism.

If a woman made that article about "Syrian men", it would be considered a "joke" and not offensive.  Leftism only knows how to portray women as victims and men as perpetrators.

Quote from: ImI on November 19, 2015, 01:30:20 AM
i just explained you why interracial couples have healthier kids as same same couples. thats all! and thats basic biology knowlege. not more and not less.

Dumb argument because nobody mentioned nor cares about "health" in the first place in the context of ANYTHING we discussed.  Yes, there are some groups like the Jews that have their illnesses dervied from genetic bottlenecks over time or whatever, but this is not a problem for most people.  Plenty of Asians living to be 100 years old without marrying into other groups.  Your argument is completely off-topic to what was being discussed.  "Health" is not exactly a bell curve attribute unless you change the word health to lifespan.



194. Post 13012264 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: acakf on November 19, 2015, 02:51:42 AM
Hahahahaha

The anti-bitcoin spammer in the above quote has created 5000 accounts praising fiat, claiming Bitcoin is terrible, and also praising political correctness and cultural Marxism.  He fits no other profile of people on earth besides the Jews with that propaganda.  Nobody else on the planet vehemently belives that way or would go through the trouble of creating so many spam accounts to do so.  Obviously a paid zionazi shill account.  Same thing with the other spammer "Controltower", both pushing the same propaganda.  Nice try JIDF, but go fuck yourself, you're not fooling anyone.




195. Post 13015596 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: molecular on November 19, 2015, 03:39:05 PM
Surprising amount of newbie accounts posting statist bullshit and terror fear mongering lately.

It's called JIDF, Zionazi shill posters.  They got the whole tribe posting here now.  Just a constant spam of "Ovey! The Goy have discovered the Bitcoin Final Solution ! We must stop them! Remember the Shoa! Remember the 600 Trillion !!!!  Anything Goy is terrorism !!!




196. Post 13016869 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on November 19, 2015, 07:35:30 PM
Fuck off!

Then tell your JIDF friends to stop creating literally 100 spam accounts per day spamming that the price of Bitcoin is going to 0 within 1 nanosecond in each post.  Only way to stop them from doing so is to reply to every single one of their posts with a giant anti-JIDF gif.  That way they draw just as much negative attention to themselves which counters their propaganda.

It's not Cointelpro doing it, it's not the Russians, it's not the Chinese, it's not random internet trolls.  It's blatantly obvious from the bullshit they're pushing who it is and that they're being funded to do so.  Maybe I'm just surrounded by idiots because you people actually refer to this entity as a "bear" and "troll".  Nobody creates literally thousands of spam accounts per year and posts on a msg board 24 hours a day with the same propaganda message over and over as a "hobby".



197. Post 13016931 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on November 19, 2015, 08:27:07 PM
more commie crap



198. Post 13019039 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Assuming the doxer isn't a reverse troll/shill, and poopchop really is this "Izabella Kaminska" person, it looks like we've uncovered the origins of it's anti-Bitcoin stance.  The last name appears to be Polish in origin, and there are many Jews who also have that last name, so it's just your typical, Jewish, pro-central banking, anti-all alternatives shills.

I've uncovered that her associate spammers that are creating hundreds of anti-bitcoin spam accounts per day are also Jewish in origin.  What a hilariously predictable outcome.  Lambchop is also likely a lesbian from her aggressive anti-male attitude, which is another reason she hates Bitcoin, because Bitcoin is entirely male.



199. Post 13019144 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Just the scare from possible overreaching EU authority over Bitcoin.  I sold at $330 to buy back later becaues I knew this would happen.  Lots of uncertainity = temporary price drop even though the EU deal will probably be a complete non-event.  All they can really do is ban Bitcoin entirely, and such an action is not going to originate from the weak ass EU.  If something like that ever happened in the western world, it would probably originate in the US or UK.

It will be funny if they try to "false flag event" Bitcoin with some terror nonsense though.  All those alternative media people like Alex Jones have been Bitcoin bears in the past because they try to correlate it with some kind of religious "mark of the beast" digital cash system.  They would probably go full retard pro-Bitcoin if the government tried to ban it and just spam about it every day giving it free advertising.  




200. Post 13019183 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 20, 2015, 02:42:01 AM
you guys heard the news?

crypto is done!

The train doesn't stop until a MattAndCat technical analysis detailing why his chart was correct but he still managed to lose money.



201. Post 13019201 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Asian drivers probably kill far more people than Islamic Militants.  I suspect this group is utilizing almost entirely Apple hardware and fiat notes to obtain automobiles.  Should probably ban both.



202. Post 13043230 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

I see Stolfi, the fiat jihadist, is still upset the price of Bitcoin is too high for his liking.  Don't worry, Stolfi, I'm sure the government will find something to blow up to blame on Bitcoin.




203. Post 13043462 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: BitUsher on November 22, 2015, 10:19:06 PM
Either way the US government has admitted to enough crimes




204. Post 13044262 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: acakf on November 22, 2015, 11:04:05 PM
Oh oh... Bitcoin terrorists enraged, coming to get me. Any time left for me to plead, in tears, on my trembling knees, for mercy? I'm scaird Sad

Another JIDF, Zionazi, central banking shill spammer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlyL2r2j7VQ



205. Post 13044370 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on November 23, 2015, 12:38:55 AM
Oh oh... Bitcoin terrorists enraged, coming to get me. Any time left for me to plead, in tears, on my trembling knees, for mercy? I'm scaird Sad

Another JIDF, Zionazi, central banking shill spammer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlyL2r2j7VQ

Another december 2013 joiner, what's with you guys? I realize you lost some money, but jeez, no need to spew your projected inadequacies all over us.

Looks like someone is offended.  If you don't want to be offended, tell your govt financed, JIDF shill friends to stop making 100 spam accounts per day on the Bitcoin forum.  Everybody knows where those spammers originate from.  



206. Post 13050603 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on November 23, 2015, 06:50:21 PM
9554 Bitcoin Belonging To ISIL Seized By Hactivists


That was me.  I plan to spend all of it to pump Corgicoin.



207. Post 13061974 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: sunnydeep on November 25, 2015, 01:10:07 AM
Well, if you're independently wealthy or [more likely] unemployed, I guess there's no need to buy bitcoin to spend it on day-to-day stuff.
If, OTOH, you do have a job, what do you do with the $$$ you make? Flush down toilet because worthless, or?

^Another paid, JIDF, Zionazi, pro-central bank, anti-bitcoin spam account.  This is about the 6000th they created so far.  Your spam accounts are useless now that everyone knows where they originate from, JIDF scumbag.

Ovey! The goy have discovered the Bitcoin final solution! They must be stopped!  Remember the Shoa, remember the 6 trillion !





208. Post 13074275 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

When do you guys want me to stop pumping?  Around $550-$600 so as to not form a double top?



209. Post 13079501 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Just got off the phone with Bernanke, he says dump treasuries, all in BTC



210. Post 13079637 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):




211. Post 13080568 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Yo dog, I heard you like observing walls, so we made the wall go up and down a lot for no reason to confuse the fuck out of you.



212. Post 13081012 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

That $350 is holding pretty damn strong.  Looks like it if breaks it's only going to $345 or $340 worst case.



213. Post 13081150 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

It's interesting that BTC saw something like a 10% hash increase lately and $320 floor x 1.1 = $352

Price was holding $340 till that fake, scare news about the EU "cracking down" on BTC due to France.  Now that the information is out that they aren't regulating anything to do with BTC for years, that probably allows the upward momentum to continue.

$340 pre-france scare x 1.1 = $374, so it might have some more upward movement soon.

Yes, I realize this is "sunk cost fallacy" math, but assuming it's people mining with similar chips, stuff like this usually does work to some extent.


edit: nevermind, it saw a huge hash increase https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

37% increase in like a week



214. Post 13081496 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on November 27, 2015, 06:17:41 AM
Hope for a fast drop, because this smells like a slow bleed.
During these slow bleeds, the majority is frozen and unable to act until it's too late. That's why one should fear slow bleeds and welcome fast drops.

The price only went up $32 (10%), almost a rounding error.  It didn't double in price like last time and needs some kind of titanic crash to come to fix the market.

The fact that the hash rate increased 37% in something like 1 week is hugely bullish for keeping price up.



215. Post 13081626 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on November 27, 2015, 06:55:24 AM
In my theory, bitcoin will eventually fail because of that increasing hashrate. The overheating of bitcoin mining has risen the costs of the network so high, that the speculator market just can't hold it up. I actually think that these last pumps haven't been deliberate pumps and dumps, but just attempts to break through that huge backlog of coins, that are ready to be sold by the miners, who would be glad to exit while getting ROI.
In 2013 mining was still relatively cheap, meaning people could hold on to their mined coins more easily. Now the coin production cost is high and most of the mining business is built on debt, so selling pressure is getting higher every day.
The future of crypto is about making the monetary system as cost effective as possible. Bitcoin and it's pure PoW concept is just the first rough version of things to come.

Your theory is horribly wrong when things like the Candy Crush video game sold for more than Bitcoin, $5.9 billion dollars:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-03/activision-to-buy-king-digital-in-5-9-billion-games-merger

Bitcoin could pass gold, which is far higher at 6 trillion.  Gold is only useful if society collapses and we go back to the dark ages with a barter society...

If Bitcoin took 1% of m2, I think it would be worth 1.5 trillion.



216. Post 13081714 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

This guy figured out how to win:

Quote from: shamati on November 05, 2015, 10:33:15 PM
Ok guys. Welcome to new bubble 2. We are goin high this time. Its goinna up to maybe 4000 this time.

Everybody take  a loan on the bank, deposit to bitfinex.com. Leverage to 100%. Ready to play.

We are back in full bubble mode guys. To win, you got to be in the game.



217. Post 13081750 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: noobtrader on November 27, 2015, 07:20:51 AM
the latest miner is very efficient that it almost 3 times cheaper to mine btc with it

Except everyone upgrades their miners....meaning nothing changes and nobody is getting cheaper coins o_O.  If everyone is still using similar efficiency 28nm and hash rate drastically increases, then miners are suddenly making no money and have to HODL unless they want to sell at a loss.  Hash rate just increased 37% in a couple weeks.



218. Post 13081887 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on November 27, 2015, 07:34:41 AM
plugging it in and operating it with 3 different commands, makes them industrialists.




219. Post 13082030 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: mixan on November 27, 2015, 07:22:22 AM
When do you guys want me to stop pumping?  Around $550-$600 so as to not form a double top?
yes that would be the optimum level to stop the pump Cheesy
I need it around $600 so I can sell the coins that I have  Wink
thanks for the continued support on this and I am sure the community appreciates this.

Done




220. Post 13082235 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):




221. Post 13082820 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Gonna need you monkey scrotums to stop trying to scalp 1/10th of 1% profit everytime we try to pass 365.



222. Post 13087578 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 27, 2015, 05:35:49 PM
The big surge in volume is in the Chinese exchanges, especially Huobi and OKCoin.  

This is wrong.  Bitfinex was leading price the majority of the time in the rise.  This is not a China pump, China just also wants to go up.

Quote from: Richy_T on November 27, 2015, 07:06:04 PM
Two years ago today when we crossed into 1k territory. Unfortunately, as we were later to find out, that was 1k GoxBux

Since nobody seems to know how many Bitcoins Gox actually had, it's still possible that instead of pumping, Gox might instead have had a negative effect on the market by selling more coins than they owned (shorting).  Yea, they're buying and selling with customer funds, but that doesn't mean they're pumping if they have 600k coins in liability on the books and only had 200k coins.  They would be naked shorting like Blythe Masters and silver.  I haven't really seen any good summary of Gox liabilities vs assets over time, but if there's always more liabilities than assets, they're doing internal naked shorts!

If Gox coins were actually stolen, and the thief dumped his coins while Gox is increasing sell side liquidity with coins they don't even have, then you have even more shorting!  In other words, nobody knows what the hell kind of influence Gox had on the market.



223. Post 13087714 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on November 27, 2015, 09:25:36 PM
Think it through again champ. Mark was missing 600k btc. Closed banking channels meant that no one could withdraw via wire transfer, but they could withdraw btc. He was buying real btc with fake and/or customer money to keep btc withdrawals working. This having a negative effect on exchange rate is ridiculous... until the scam came crashing down of course.

If Gox coins really were stolen, and the thief dumped coins for cash, then how is Karpeles pumping by buying a smaller amount of coins with customer funds to enable withdrawal?  It would be a wash or probably negative movement from him not buying as many as were stolen.  The only way Karpeles is pumping in that scenario is if the "thief" didn't sell any.  Who would steal $200 million dollars in goods and not sell any?

One of the few pump situations is if Karpeles stole the coins himself, hid them, didn't spend any, then uses customer funds to fund withdrawal with the intent of letting the business collapse and run off with the hidden coins later.  Gox is a mystery to me because he was already making lots of money and doing something like that would be lots of risk for not much of a lifestyle improvement over what you already have.  He could already buy gold toilets.

There's also always the chance a govt entity shows up making threats or saying they'll set him up for prison time if he doesn't help them get control of the keys or implode the market.




224. Post 13095385 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Moon time:

Chinese Stocks Plunge 5.5%, Their Biggest Single-Day Drop in 3 Months

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/28/business/china-shanghai-stock-market.html?ribbon-ad-idx=5&rref=world/asia

Chinese Cash Floods U.S. Real Estate Market

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/29/business/international/chinese-cash-floods-us-real-estate-market.html?ribbon-ad-idx=5&src=trending

Do the Chinese know we're still in a real estate bubble and houses will probably drop some huge amount like 30%?  They'd be better off just hodling Bitcoin. 



225. Post 13095578 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: vibroking on November 28, 2015, 07:30:03 PM
Just read this and it made me sad Sad
Bitcoin Price Locomotive Runs out of Steam
Don't read, will make you lose hope.

Yea, because everyone knows the price is supposed to go at a 45 degree angle upward forever and it's not possible to go sideways.



226. Post 13095636 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Micro wedge is sideways and the macro wedge is up.  Price is right in the middle of the micro wedge.






227. Post 13095898 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Within an hour or two there will be a pump to $365-7ish or dump to $348-350



228. Post 13096028 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Triangle attempting to converge on the upside...



229. Post 13096477 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

I fucked that up drawing charts with an ideology I don't agree with, that outlier data is useful for anything whatsoever.  Here's a better chart.  That second downward wave had a lot of sideways to it and looked happy to stay around 2240 yuan ($350), so if the triangle converges downward, worst case scenario is panic to $340-345, then probably bounce back to $345-350.  Miner whales may attempt to converge it at $367, then drop, then above a $370 double top for a huge rally to $385-400.




230. Post 13096818 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: peonminer on November 28, 2015, 11:02:58 PM
Correction to $33,700.92 in bound.





231. Post 13097470 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Tzupy on November 29, 2015, 12:13:10 AM
Looks like pump time to me...

Chart I made earlier.  The 5th wedge maintenance buy came in instead of a dump, which might have locked in $350.  At the very least it's gonna cause a long time span of sideways movement with a platform for further up:

Then:



Now:




232. Post 13100828 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: molecular on November 29, 2015, 09:05:44 AM
The rocket had been filling up with fuel for a long time

L O A D  T H E  S P A C E S H I P S  W I T H  T H E  R O C K E T  F U E L

http://youtu.be/cF4ZTcuhixc?t=60



233. Post 13101831 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: vibroking on November 29, 2015, 01:53:14 PM
Another bitcoin extortion scheme, no doubt. When bitcoiners not pitching bitcoin to friends and family, or stealing bitcoins from friends and family, they DDoS so-called 'Bitcoin businesses' with their bitcoin botnets.
I tell you... Angry

^Same JIDF, Zionist, central banking shill spammer as usual.  Now on his 6000th spam account that he gets paid for to post.  Too bad your shill posts are useless now that everyone knows where these spam accounts originate from.



234. Post 13101912 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: silversolveseverything on November 29, 2015, 02:36:26 PM
Another bitcoin extortion scheme, no doubt. When bitcoiners not pitching bitcoin to friends and family, or stealing bitcoins from friends and family, they DDoS so-called 'Bitcoin businesses' with their bitcoin botnets.
I tell you... Angry

^Same JIDF, Zionist, central banking shill spammer as usual.  Now on his 6000th spam account that he gets paid for to post.  Too bad your shill posts are useless now that everyone knows where these spam accounts originate from.

Good work r0ach, another Jew outed. As one of America's greatest modern philosophers, senatorial candidate Robert Ransdel, has taught us, With Jews, we lose!

Oh look, JIDF, pro-central banking Zionazis got caught creating over 5000 anti-bitcoin spam accounts, now they're trying to reverse shill to pretend it's a witch hunt against all Jews when they're the ones who caught in the act doing something wrong.  Your garbage propaganda doesn't work when everyone knows who you are and where your accounts originate from.



235. Post 13104980 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Halaman on November 29, 2015, 04:23:55 PM
AS I UNDERSTAND! It a very big mix on both sides and now there is a lot of changing sides

Is this a joke?  You need to have either a sub 60 IQ or be so politically correct that you literally brainwash yourself into living in a fictional bubble to believe such things.  All it takes to completely control a country is to insert your mafia into the media and banks, then you even get to decide who the president is.  What does the following picture look like?  Sure looks like an Israeli mafia to me.  If those red squares were all Italians or even Chinese, people would be rioting in the streets and refering to it as the Italian mafia.  Americans are just a combination of too dumb, and too weakling, leftist, politically correct to not be slaves in their own country.  Federal reserve and the rest of the banking system looks exactly the same.  Have fun slaves!










236. Post 13105033 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: criptix on November 29, 2015, 09:25:41 PM
Did you just busted the greatest non-white, jew and gay conspiracy that ever existed?
You should release a book and wake up humanity.

 Roll Eyes

The green box says "goy" not "gay".  How predictable was it that your standard American slob would make that mistake?  How did you type that reply with the entire keyboard covered in cheetos?



237. Post 13105277 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on November 29, 2015, 09:43:26 PM
If our resident r0ach didn't have such an illustrious history of investing in Dogecoin, Catcoin, and even... Corgicoin(?), I would have pinned him as a relatively advanced form of lambie trolling.

Sadly, it appears he is quite real, quite butthurt, and will continue working tirelessly to shit up this thread while making veterans cringe and newbies blush before they close the tab.

Oh, did my posting a chart of factual reality offend you?  What would make someone offended by facts?  Do you have something you want to admit to us of why that chart offended you?  Are you ashamed to admit it?  I guess you are.  This is a common theme with you.  All of your posts are far leftist, ultra politically correct in nature.  This is the Bitcoin crypto anarchy forum, not the Karl Marx institute of higher learning.  If you're going to continue to try and push your mainstream media ideology of fraud and lies, you should find another forum.  Maybe MSNBC, Huffingtonpost, or Goldmansachs forum.  I think they even have a few militant feminist websites you can join now.



238. Post 13105402 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: oda.krell on November 29, 2015, 10:07:12 PM
*sigh*

Less than 6 hours in between...

I think you're onto something.  All the libertarians and anarchists that made millions off Bitcoin stopped posting and went and bought private islands.  Now all we're left with is Ivory tower leftist shills like you and Stolfi.  Then we got a few scumbag daytraders scurrying around trying to scalp a few cents, and of course Mattandhiscat panic buying and selling 50 times a day and losing everything on exchange fees.



239. Post 13105636 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: criptix on November 29, 2015, 10:35:47 PM

Corrected for you  Grin




240. Post 13105661 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: criptix on November 29, 2015, 10:43:45 PM

Ah dont feel sad - wasnt it obvious we gonna make fun of you after posts like that?  Grin


Um, you're the guy who thought the word goy meant homosexual...

What do you do when not posting here?  Bowling?  Nascar rallies?  Speed eating?



241. Post 13105764 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Not $1600-$3200 for next ATH yet




242. Post 13106391 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on November 30, 2015, 12:26:28 AM




Those are not even close to anarchists.  Those are identical to the collectivist leftists posting in this thread.  Leftism is a mental disorder based on inferiority complex where you can only relate to groups deemed weak, discriminated against, wronged, inferior, etc.  

Those people latch onto the whales because they see them as having been wronged.  It's a clear case of textbook collectivist leftism.  Their mental disorder is often mistaken for just common empathy, but that's not how it works.  Anything seen as strong or seemingly normal they have contempt for, so it's not empathy, but an actual behavior pattern/defect.

They were all dumped into the trash can when they were younger and now show contempt for anything in their mind that they see stronger than themselves (which is everything).



243. Post 13107247 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

I'm starting to suspect this pause is a trap for shorts to squeeze our way to $400.



244. Post 13113626 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 30, 2015, 09:11:52 AM
Perhaps I am a better bitcoiner than buttcoiner after all...  Grin

Stolfi hyping Bitcoin to the moon in Brazil!

BITCOIN FEVER SPREADS ACROSS BRAZIL

http://bravenewcoin.com/news/bitcoin-fever-spreads-across-brazil/



245. Post 13115215 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

If you want to know why Bitcoin currently has a glass ceiling for price, just like gold does, and how to fix it (hint: involves block size), read my post:

What Bitcoin is actually designed for vs the Gavinator and Theymos vision

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1271254.0



246. Post 13116461 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

edit:  looks like maintenace buys coming in to extend wedge, pump continues



247. Post 13116901 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Guess I was wrong guys, this pump continues.  Sold at 377 when I saw it running out of steam, rebought at 377 when I saw manipulation maintenance buys coming in to extend the wedge, now it's 379 o_O.  If manipulators were going to dump I don't think they would be trying to extend this wedge at all and already would have dumped, so to infinity dollars we go!  There will likely be at least 1 more wedge going up after this one closes.




248. Post 13116986 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 01, 2015, 04:39:41 AM
it's going to "crash" very soon... it make sense to support slightly lower prices as you unload slightly higher,  scraping 1% as you unload, i do this often. bulls just wrecked themselves, when the selling is done the support from the scraping is done too. and what are you left with? a bunch of lagtards trying to grab profits as the top clearly forms, then panic ensues and i cover.

Not gonna happen IMO.  I'm a 3rd degree black belt in alt coin trading where nothing has any fundamentals and the only thing you can trade on is manipulation.  What I'm witnessing right now is a manipulation setup for an upward movement on convergence of triangle.




249. Post 13117323 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Ok, all forms of TA and guessing are now useless.  No dump or pump occurred, it just randomly goes sideways within margin of error for no reason.



250. Post 13117356 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: suda123 on December 01, 2015, 06:33:06 AM
Ok, all forms of TA and guessing are now useless.  No dump or pump occurred, it just randomly goes sideways within margin of error for no reason.
Ahh TA still tells a story though of who's playing. also hi /pol/ Smiley

A lot of dumps were absorbed to hold that so I'm expecting gigantic green candle soon.  Otherwise nobody would have gone through the effort of holding price on bottom of wave.



251. Post 13117512 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Last chance to sell before it goes to $32,000



252. Post 13117565 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

While everyone waits for triangle to converge, a message from the exalted, great leader, CEO of Bitcoin:




253. Post 13118512 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

I saw a lot of manipulation trying to extend the wedge to the upside and it took FOREVER for that wedge to break down and go one direction or another so I didn't go by my original gut instinct:

01[21:24] <r0ach> dump that breaks the trend and wedge is usually more harmful that one after immediate pump, which would probably take it to $362ish

Oh well, all my coins were bought at $230 anyway.



254. Post 13118688 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

zzz



255. Post 13118917 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on December 01, 2015, 10:24:24 AM
I think that there will be a series of dumps cause by the black Friday/cyber Monday sales. Many early adopters, who don't earn very much with their day jobs, used their coins to buy cheap stuff and now Bitpay needs to unload.

That was a pretty half azz thought pattern.  Any Bitcoin super early adopter is a technology freak that wants the best, nicest, most powerful thing around, you know the stuff that costs money.  They aren't buying cheap, trashy, 1ghz athlon netbooks off holiday sales.  Even if the stuff they wanted was on sale for Black Friday, they aren't waiting until Black Friday to buy it!  And if they were an early adopter, they already bought gold plated toilets and gold plated Nvidia Titans and don't care about some trivial sale.



256. Post 13118995 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: dloghwak on December 01, 2015, 10:39:07 AM
I think that there will be a series of dumps cause by the black Friday/cyber Monday sales. Many early adopters, who don't earn very much with their day jobs, used their coins to buy cheap stuff and now Bitpay needs to unload.

That was a pretty half azz thought pattern.  Any Bitcoin super early adopter is a technology freak that wants the best, nicest, most powerful thing around, you know the stuff that costs money.  They aren't buying cheap, trashy, 1ghz athlon netbooks off holiday sales.  Even if the stuff they wanted was on sale for Black Friday, they aren't waiting until Black Friday to buy it!
That was an even more half azz thought pattern tho.

No, you people keep repeating some lame, Jorge Stolfi propaganda.  That it's only possible for the price to increase due to Russian Ponzi schemes, and toilet paper rolls being on sale for 20% off at the Dollar Store on Black Friday will cause the price to crash.



257. Post 13119055 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Did anyone else see that 1200 coin market buy lol.  Now it's only 500 coins till $380 on Bitstamp, wtf is going on here.



258. Post 13119142 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Bitfinex just single handedly dragged down Bitstamp + Huobi + Coinbase by going $5 under Bistamp with their leveraging screwups.  Same thing happened earlier too.



259. Post 13122564 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

China wants to go up.  Here we go ladies, still living the dream.




260. Post 13122775 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Just got off the phone with Xi Jinping, he said he would allow AdamstgBit to refill his 1 BTC bag before resume pump.




261. Post 13122856 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: mrkavasaki on December 01, 2015, 07:09:25 PM
bitcoin is dead

we will probably see new lows by 2016

Looks like another member sold their account to the JIDF.



262. Post 13122995 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: xcdrx on December 01, 2015, 07:16:18 PM
We ain't got a chance...
https://youtu.be/RlHVin56U2w
With Jews, we lose  Sad

Now the anti-btc, pro-central banking spammers from the JIDF who have already created over 5000 spam accounts pretend to be "white supremacists" when the origin of their IP addresses is discovered.



263. Post 13125820 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Time to back up the truck and load up before Adam can buy.



264. Post 13127471 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: keystroke on December 02, 2015, 08:06:12 AM
the universe was hidden in the fractional parts of the cube roots of the first 64 primes.

So you're saying it's time to back the truck up and start shoveling coins in?



265. Post 13127753 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

The global economic news is currently so bad, I'm expecting to look out the window and see empty grocery store shelves and shootings in the street any second.  I estimate each round of gunfire will be worth a 1% BTC increase.



266. Post 13131216 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: kingaltcoins on December 02, 2015, 09:47:57 AM
People need to dump some coins now as I'm waiting for a long time to buy BTC @$220.




267. Post 13131357 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

1,450 btc market buy.  Did Stolfi back up the truck to pick up a shipment?



268. Post 13133987 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Eud-GR on December 02, 2015, 11:20:06 PM
Of cause he knows that 99% of bitcoin uses are in illegal activities related to Terrorism, Money Laundering, pump and dump Ponzi Scheme, Child Porn, Drug, Hack, Ransom etc..

Bitcoin is known to be "criminals money, created by criminals for criminals." normal people have no incentive to use bitcoin. ask him to ask his own parents how much percent of the real money his family are using for shady shit. just simple like that.

^The JIDF, Zionist shill is back who has already created over 5000 anti-btc, pro-central banking spam accounts.  Your propaganda accounts are useless now that everybody knows where they originate from.




269. Post 13135140 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: r0ach on December 02, 2015, 09:35:36 AM
The global economic news is currently so bad, I'm expecting to look out the window and see empty grocery store shelves and shootings in the street any second.  I estimate each round of gunfire will be worth a 1% BTC increase.

$365 - r0achstradamus strikes again



270. Post 13135227 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: Alley on December 03, 2015, 03:58:00 AM
So that dump was just a bear trap? 

Lamont the Bitcoin delivery man is back with a package for the shorters.




271. Post 13135680 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.35h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 03, 2015, 05:38:58 AM
looks like another run at 400 is brewing

$400 run Roger Verified



272. Post 13143511 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Whenever the price goes up or down $1




273. Post 13143660 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Mattandthecat coming in to short, decides not to short, wants out of short:

http://imgur.com/gallery/Gs0WKOv



274. Post 13143815 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Bernanke trading Bitcoin today?  Someone who owns 1200-1300 BTC leveraged them out as 4000 fake, stair stepped short walls on Bitfinex.  The exact same behavior is also seen on several other exchanges even if they don't allow leverage.

He either wants to buy more before price increases or his middle name is Shalom.



275. Post 13143878 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 04, 2015, 01:28:31 AM
the next 24 mins will determine the direction of the next 24 hours


Son I am disappoint.  Draw better chart:




276. Post 13143952 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Looks like drop back to $350-355 trading range



277. Post 13144343 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 04, 2015, 02:58:13 AM
sold everything back again, ready for that 333 price target it was foolish of me to second guess myself.

I was expecting a dump to $350 then for it to go sideways a few days before doing something else.  Now we have this:




278. Post 13144377 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Does China have their own Bitcoin central bank that we don't know about.



279. Post 13144394 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):



Peak China is in and now China just wants to move the money into anything that isn't a yuan or China stock?

http://www.thecommentator.com/article/6078/just_like_japan_in_the_90s_china_s_success_story_is_over

Next stop Bitcoin = infinity?



280. Post 13152208 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: fortune143 on December 04, 2015, 08:19:16 PM
Sorry but this is not true. Proof of work is one way of securing a blockchain, however proof of stake blockchains do not require a lot of computing power at all and I can think of at least two POS currencies which have robust blockchains.

Technically all non-open entropy, proof of stake coins are permissioned ledgers.  These type of chains will exist in the future for a variety of purposes, but it appears Bitcoin is unstoppable as the main monetary unit now.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 04, 2015, 06:11:17 PM
They have no use for bitcoin or any other cryptocurrencies. If they had, they would use some closed centralized "currency" like Ripple.

The bitcoin blockchain is a lousy and terribly inefficient data structure.

A system like DPoS is what they will end up using for a ledger that can be accessed by the outside public while preventing attack by owning a majority of stake between banks/financial institutions.



281. Post 13152846 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on December 05, 2015, 01:29:46 AM
So what is the general consensus on what the outcome of the scaling conference this weekend might be?

Blockstream has conceded and it's going to 8mb blocks:

"Another idea that has been gathering support is Blockstream CEO and Hashcash inventor Dr. Adam Back's “2-4-8” quick fix, which would incrementally increase to the limit to 8 megabytes in three steps over four years time."

So small blockers are officially dead.  Adam Back is a part of Blockstream.  

It is my estimation that Bitcoin needs around 10MB block size to remove the glass ceiling on price (8MB is close enough), so next stop moon:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1271254.msg13115160#msg13115160



282. Post 13153221 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

My price estimate for next Bitcoin jump is $1600 with 4MB blocks and $3200ish with 8MB blocks:

Lowball Bitcoin price prediction as a money transmitter in comparison to Paypal

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1243623.0

It seems Blockstream has conceded to 8MB blocks and that's probably what will result from scaling conference.  Those price estimates are sustained and not peak, so god knows what peak can be.



283. Post 13153355 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Sitarow on December 05, 2015, 03:20:06 AM
My price estimate for next Bitcoin jump is $1600 with 4MB blocks and $3200ish with 8MB blocks:

Lowball Bitcoin price prediction as a money transmitter in comparison to Paypal

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1243623.0

It seems Blockstream has conceded to 8MB blocks and that's probably what will result from scaling conference.  Those price estimates are sustained and not peak, so god knows what peak can be.

this is fucking bullish

+ i think at the conference we're going to hear a lot of good ideas / things that are currently  being worked on to scale bitcoin

poeple are going to realize its not a simple matter of upping the limit, and there are actually are many possibility, so people's minds will change from "IF bitcoin will scale", to "HOW bitcoin will scale". we could see an impressive bull run with this.


This needs a gif.








284. Post 13153646 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: peonminer on December 05, 2015, 04:15:13 AM
When are we going to short as a team? Cheesy $390 this time? $420???

Quote from: r0ach on December 04, 2015, 12:54:13 AM
Mattandthecat coming in to short, decides not to short, wants out of short:

http://imgur.com/gallery/Gs0WKOv



285. Post 13154185 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 05, 2015, 06:20:11 AM
So what is the general consensus on what the outcome of the scaling conference this weekend might be?
Blockstream has conceded and it's going to 8mb blocks:

"Another idea that has been gathering support is Blockstream CEO and Hashcash inventor Dr. Adam Back's “2-4-8” quick fix, which would incrementally increase to the limit to 8 megabytes in three steps over four years time."

So small blockers are officially dead.  Adam Back is a part of Blockstream.  

It is my estimation that Bitcoin needs around 10MB block size to remove the glass ceiling on price (8MB is close enough), so next stop moon:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1271254.msg13115160#msg13115160

Adam floated that 2-4-8 proposal a few months ago.  Sorry, but I can't believe that it is a sincere proposal. 

AFAIK, that proposal has no implementation yet, not even a BIP. (There are only two proposals with implementations: Gavin's BIP101 and my BIP99½  Grin).

I strongly suspect that Adam does not have any intention of implementing that plan, certainly not before the network gets saturated.  I believe that he made that proposal only to pretend that he is a reasonable guy, and to steal support from BIP101.

If the 2-4-8 plan were implemented in time, there would be no "fee market".  Then all those small-blockians who are impatient to see the fee market in action would be protesting loudly.  Why aren't they?  Perhaps because they too sense that Adam does not really mean it?

Doesn't matter if he has no specific BIP, it just means they would end up going along with Garzik's BIP100 probably.  China won't go over 8MB, so it will probably fork to either 4MB or 8MB and BIP100.



286. Post 13159379 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on December 05, 2015, 07:48:41 PM
hmmmm...

-.-- --- ..- / .- .-. . / .- -. / .. -.. .. --- -

The wealthy tend to prefer tax avoidance rather than tax evasion.

Yea, so now they'll use a London trust denominated in Bitcoin for both at the same time. (Rockefellers, Rothschilds, etc)



287. Post 13160612 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Mattandthecat reverse indicator confirmed.  Price is going to collapse...if you hold the chart upside down.



288. Post 13160674 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Stolfi is backing up the truck to load up more!



289. Post 13160721 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Frost on December 05, 2015, 11:23:15 PM
I have no idea what drives this price, this is extremely manipulated isn't it? Huh

Are you trying to tell me that with a fixed supply currency, people would buy a lot then attempt to corner the market increasing price further until it reaches infinity?HuhHuh??



290. Post 13161085 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: peonminer on December 05, 2015, 11:54:55 PM
Just saw Adam

says he forgot to buy back




291. Post 13162730 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Last Huobi rise seems to be rejected because of Bitstamp's downward manipulation wall.  People don't want to create a double top so $400 will probably attempt to be supported, but I think it's going to have to go sideways from here with some up and down for a while in order to get more buying action/arb on Bistamp.



292. Post 13164658 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Scarce is better on December 06, 2015, 11:27:33 AM
China, officially the People's Republic of China, is a sovereign state in East Asia. It is the world's most populous country, with a population of over 1.35 billion. The PRC is a single-party state governed by the Communist Party

Nice, one party government, sounds very efficient.



293. Post 13172180 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Newest most accurate TA:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1279383.0



294. Post 13173612 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

The big ass macro wedge broke to the upside if anyone wasn't paying attention.  Mining seems like a horrible investment right now so I imagine the price will keep increasing till it's not. 




295. Post 13173826 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: r0ach on October 29, 2015, 08:36:22 PM
Breaking News:  China has declared war on fiat!






296. Post 13174071 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: mrkavasaki on December 07, 2015, 01:09:46 PM

these are north koreans

China used Bitcoin to buy Korea



297. Post 13188960 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Wait for it...




298. Post 13189162 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

The bear traps were hung by the Bistamp with care, making sure Zionist shills would soon be there.

Quote from: kwukduck on December 07, 2015, 11:10:15 PM
Notice how there's an enormous pressure keeping it under $400?




299. Post 13190162 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: ImI on December 09, 2015, 01:23:59 AM
i personally hoped that those coins got burned in the first place and may never seen selling cause the keys got destroyed.

I knew those coins would move someday in the future because as I've stated 100 times already, he would have sent the coins to a black hole address to inspire more faith in the project rather than just sitting on unspent coins if that was his goal.  He's obviously not just going to market dump all the coins when 2020 hits either.  He supposedly already owns $60 million in separate Bitcoin, so he's not hard up for cash.

The logical market in this case would be making moves with the assumption that a private individual or group controls the coins rather than a government organization like the NSA.  Due to the alleged info on the trust, which basically states it's purpose is to pump Bitcoin to the moon, and finacial entities like ETFs being required to know the identities of major holders, the overall market reaction should be somewhere between flat to bullish.  

I don't really see any bear facts because logical people already knew the coins were still controlled since they weren't shipped to a black hole address.



300. Post 13190353 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

This.  Now it gets tricky.  Either sideways at $415-420ish or it blow past $500 completely because TPTB are not going to let it stagnate in the mid 400's as to form a double top signal.

Quote from: r0ach on December 07, 2015, 12:13:26 PM
The big ass macro wedge broke to the upside if anyone wasn't paying attention.  Mining seems like a horrible investment right now so I imagine the price will keep increasing till it's not.  





301. Post 13190403 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: DefendKebab on December 09, 2015, 03:13:32 AM
might go to 3200.



302. Post 13190469 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Frost on December 09, 2015, 03:15:40 AM
I second this.

This Frost guy is the leader of the new left behind movement.  Went full fiat then it rose to $320 and he's like...this is bullshit!  It can't go up anymore, I'm going to wait till it drops to $280.  Then it goes to $500, then drops back to $320 again and he still doesn't buy.  Now it's about to go past $500 and he's still waiting to "buy the $280 dip".

You gotta play the game to win.  Don't be one of those people who was "waiting to buy the dip" when the price goes from $100 to $125 in last bubble before going to $1000.



303. Post 13191139 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: hendra147 on December 09, 2015, 05:12:42 AM
Craig Steven Wright is only issue to raise bitcoin price  Huh
http://www.coindesk.com/satoshi-nakamoto-unmasking-might-be-driving-bitcoins-price-rally/

Dumb story.  That wedge was breaking to the upside regardless.



304. Post 13191734 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on December 09, 2015, 06:32:22 AM
I'm just contemplating on when would be the best time to drop the short hammer with my six figure tradeable balance.

Be like the guy on Bitfinex yesterday who shorted 700 coins at $400 for an instant, free $17,500 loss today.  He leveraged out $99k, about the exact same amount.



305. Post 13193044 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Feeling like it's gonna hit $600 long before the halving comes now.  Also starting to feel like a banking crash worse than 2008 might happen before we even get to the halving in eight or so months.  The new world order = a simultaneous Comex run and some 10-20x+ Bitcoin bubble turning the world financial system upside down occuring at the same time.

If every single Bitcoin was already mined, and every millionaire on earth invested only 1% of their money in Bitcoin, price would be $8000 per coin, but that assumes market cap is fully backed with liquidity, so the real price would be way higher.  This does not include governments, banks, hedge funds, people with less than a $1 million investing, etc, just millionaires investing only 1% :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1235466.0

The extremely low ball price for next 2008 crash will probably be something monsterous like $10,000+ a coin because it can easily go to $3000+ in the next year or two without even having another 2008 crash:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1243623.0

When every single day you wake up having the odds of another 2008 crash being here any second, you have to be literally stupid to not own any Bitcoin or to go full fiat.



306. Post 13199806 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: inca on December 09, 2015, 11:22:35 PM
Be sure to let us all know when the next top is in..

If you look at the long term charts, it was holding $600 for a while even after Gox with no halving on the horizon so getting to $600 won't be much of a problem.  It's only after $600 pre-halving does it start to get unpredictable where it might go to something like $800 then dump back down to $600, or it might go all the way to something like $10,000 as talked about in this thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1235466.0

There's a lot of room for big gains and big shakeouts past $600, but until $600+ pre-halving, it's pretty routine.

Quote from: chesthing on December 09, 2015, 09:53:07 PM
If fiat does collapse to zero, I assure you the last thing on your mind will be bitcoin - it will be how the fuck am I going to survive this day?

No, it will actually be - "I wonder how much my Bitcoins are worth now."





307. Post 13200186 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Before next Bitcoin bubble:



After next Bitcoin bubble:





308. Post 13200989 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 10, 2015, 12:56:24 AM
I do expect a 2+ month consolidation in the mid 300s.

There will be a consolidation




309. Post 13203245 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on December 10, 2015, 07:30:26 AM
It seems like FOMO influenced just enough people to start moving down again.






310. Post 13209643 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Ultrafinery on December 10, 2015, 10:54:33 PM
Fiat is the least volotile, just convert straight into fiat. Hey, make it easy on yourself, use fiat throughout & avoid all this rigamarole.

The JIDF, pro-central banking, Zionist shills are back after they've already created 5000 other spam accounts.  Your spam accounts are useless now that everyone knows where they originate from.  You'll have to think up a new strategy besides being a weak, Woody Allen figure trying to manipulate things from behind a curtain because it doesn't work anymore:









311. Post 13209981 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

This thread has turned into a complete noob convention.  Whether you think block size should be 1MB or 10MB, to address spam on a blockchain, you don't purposely make the blocks as small as possible, you institute a minimum transaction fee capable of preventing the spam regardless of block size.  Litecoin has a 0.001 min transaction fee for this reason.  Bitcoin needs to increase the minimum transaction fee as well.  Zero fee transactions never should have existed in the first place.



312. Post 13210067 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: hdbuck on December 11, 2015, 12:04:21 AM
This thread has turned into a complete noob convention.  Whether you think block size should be 1MB or 10MB, to address spam on a blockchain, you don't purposely make the blocks as small as possible, you institute a minimum transaction fee capable of preventing the spam regardless of block size.  Litecoin has a 0.001 min transaction fee for this reason.  Bitcoin needs to increase the minimum transaction fee as well.  Zero fee transactions never should have existed in the first place.

Bitcoin doesnt "need" anything. Bitcoin "is".

You might be able to make the argument that zero fee transactions should exist to allow Bitcoin the possibility of being run as some kind of public utility, but that would be a pro-central government standpoint.



313. Post 13210187 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on December 11, 2015, 12:18:11 AM
This thread has turned into a complete noob convention.  Whether you think block size should be 1MB or 10MB, to address spam on a blockchain, you don't purposely make the blocks as small as possible, you institute a minimum transaction fee capable of preventing the spam regardless of block size.  Litecoin has a 0.001 min transaction fee for this reason.  Bitcoin needs to increase the minimum transaction fee as well.  Zero fee transactions never should have existed in the first place.

So when Bitcoin is at Adams 32k it will cost $32 to do a transaction?

If Bitcoin is worth $32k and only has a 1MB block size, it will act solely as either:

1) a clearing/settlement network for banks

or

2)  a clearing/settlement network for the Lightning Network

At that point, transaction fees made for purchases by individual users would not be affected and you would rarely pay it except when doing things like changing Lightning hubs or changing banks.  Bitcoin with 1MB blocks is purely a settlement layer.  The minimum, economical transaction size on the main chain with 1MB blocks would probably be something like $50k-100k IMO.  Increasing block size by one order of magnitude to 10MB would put Bitcoin in more of a gray area where normal humans would be using the main chain as kind of a checkbook for large purchases.  

I haven't put much thought into the ideal minimum transaction fee for 1MB blocks, but it would likely be 0.0001 or 0.001

If I was the dictator of Bitcoin, I would likely just change it to 5 minute block times with 4MB max size, or 2.5 minute blocks and 2MB block size, both with 0.0001 min transaction fee.  Something new like Bitcoin-NG would likely come along and fork over to replace this though.



314. Post 13210265 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on December 11, 2015, 12:48:58 AM
I woke up one day and looked in my wallet. I couldn't find what i was looking for... the passphrase was nonsensical to me any more. I chose to remove it because the thought of it was eating into my brain like a slow acid drop on a loaf of dry crusty bread. I had enough. Things had to change. I needed confidence, assurance, vision, and most of all I need clarity of thought. Enough with the promises, the false narratives, the false flags and worst of all the straight-up, in-your-face deception. I am no longer waiting, i am not going to sit here and wait for my fate to be handed to me in one small violation of my security after another. With this one declaration.... I am no longer waiting..., I feel that sense of liberation, it is upon me, I will step forward to accept my place in history. Join me planet earth, let us do this together, step into the future without shame or guile.... just pure, transparent, open ambition. Let's go.

What does this mean?  You're getting a sex change?



315. Post 13210479 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: ABitTwentySeventy on December 11, 2015, 01:05:28 AM
So you can use BTC as you suggest alts should be used -- for moving your (presumably highly volatile) native currency into real money -- USD.

Yea, let's all convert our Bitcoin into Jewish paper confetti and watch as it goes to 0 value as they print an infinite amount more, great idea.  You Zionist spammers from the JIDF that have already created over 5000 pro-central banking spam accounts need better propaganda.




316. Post 13210715 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: ABitTwentySeventy on December 11, 2015, 02:12:13 AM
Sorry if I offended your wannabe Nazi friend, Adam.
I didn't mean to.
Yea, let's all convert our Bitcoin into Jewish paper confetti and watch as it goes to 0

Zionism and Naziism are both identical, ethnocentric, racial supremacist cults.  Therefore, yes, you are a Nazi-wannabe since you're a pro-central banking, JIDF, Zionist shill account.





317. Post 13210771 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: ImI on December 11, 2015, 02:24:22 AM
hey r0ach, you are from eastern-europe aren't you?

Since your insinuation implies that you disagree with my statement of factual, objective reality that exists, I can only assume you're a far leftist American, metrosexual, coward, brainwashed, or otherwise shell of a man that would likely die within 5 minutes of being placed in a timeline at any date before the 1900s.



318. Post 13211375 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Need to get my new Bitcoin miner working now:




319. Post 13212499 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):





320. Post 13215553 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: suda123 on December 11, 2015, 02:30:49 PM
I have an immensely important question I want to ask since I was just told something, why does the price move the way it does?it goes up by 10-20$s then completely stops. And how much does it take to make it to 10$s plus?

Ask not what your coin can do for you, but how you can help pump the coin.



321. Post 13221078 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote
I just hate being glued to the charts.  It completely consumes me.




322. Post 13221287 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Price is pretty much guaranteed to be $600 or higher after halving in 7 or so months, so this rise will probably go to $600 or higher when there's not much risk of buying right now.  You need to be suicidal to try and short this under $600.  This could be "the big one" and it just keeps on going after $600 though.



323. Post 13221508 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: peonminer on December 12, 2015, 03:02:59 AM
http://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2015/12/11/should-you-invest-in-bitcoin-10-arguments-in-favor-as-of-december-2015/

Forbes seems to believe we are headed $604+, then $17,473

BULLISH

$17k in 2025 seems way low balling it.  Before the next 2008 financial crash, we will likely see another bull run to take BTC to 3k-10k.  When the price is already at levels that high, the financial crash will create a true black swan event to turn Bitcoin into one of the biggest currencies in the world.  All of that stuff is going to happen long before 2025.

People really think the drive to Walmart economy is going to last another 10 years? lol



324. Post 13221702 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Finally the first retrace to kill the excessive BFX longs.  We can't go up more without getting rid of some of them first.



325. Post 13221796 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

This is how it works guys.  Too many parasitic Finex longs who weren't doing any of the leg work to raise this thing get punished and the people who were raising it get the reward.



326. Post 13221920 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Ok, all BFX longs wrecked, now we proceed to $10,000.



327. Post 13223741 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Welp, called that one perfectly:




328. Post 13223805 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

FOMO reload



329. Post 13223840 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

10/10 shakeout

Would shake again.



330. Post 13231405 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Dis coin price small like girly man.  It is time to pump it larger.




331. Post 13239769 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

I have traveled to China to learn the money making secrets from famed author Jun Zi.  I am now ready to out trade all of you.




332. Post 13239928 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

As much as I would like it to go up, I don't see how it's not gonna dump some then create a new more sideways trend line after this point.  Probably dump to 2750-2800 yuan, but BFX longs might get scared and create a shit storm to go lower:




333. Post 13242309 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):




334. Post 13242340 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

$500+ by end of dec is looking legit.  Supposed to be some type of possible implosion on Dec 16 when they raise interest rates, so owning Bitcoin on that date is a pretty good idea.



335. Post 13246498 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):




336. Post 13250850 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Gatekeeper on December 15, 2015, 12:59:09 AM
so first coinbase has a load of fake trading like Huobi does and their volume exploded and now Bitfinex is playing up, hmmmmmmm wonder what's going on.

I was on Coinbase exchange watching it while it was going down.  It honestly looked like a bot was haywire constantly buying then dumping over and over for no reason.  The trades weren't spread out over a long time or anything, it was literally milliseconds apart just constant spam.  I'm not sure if anything actually happened besides some random guy losing a shit ton of money in exchange fees, which he is probably trying to dispute with Coinbase.  The net effect of his bot's actions didn't drive the price up, it drove price down a couple dollars below Bitstamp.



337. Post 13251300 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Federal Reserve pumping Bitcoin on December 16, 2015

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1289693.0



338. Post 13251353 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on December 15, 2015, 03:11:29 AM
Well, this sucks. I really thought $450 would hold. It's a good thing I'm only paying 1/18th as much interest on my short as the longs are paying.

It's a good thing I still have my cold storage stash. I'm thinking there is a real possibility I'm going to get margin called at >800. Less than 50/50, but enough to get me worried.

You made the mistake of assuming someone who puts up multiple $2 million sell walls on several different exchanges in the exact same position wants the price of Bitcoin to go down even though they own millions of dollars worth of it.



339. Post 13252760 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

People in the west are just proceeding cautiously until new floors are established by China.  Once China manages to hold certain levels for a long time, then the west builds walls there.



340. Post 13252949 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 15, 2015, 07:39:18 AM
I think saying "the demand is in China' quite possibly one of the most bearish things you can say, after everything that happened in 2013-2014 with PBOC and all the fake volume. I came back here after 2 years expecting Chinese would be completely factored out of the price levels by now and that everything would be based on USD and adoption. I even expected it would be $1000 by now, all based on USD and adoption. Saying that $460 is 'supported by China' is like going way back in time and being a bear.

In the west you have the traditional barons of industry trying to suppress price and accumulate and pump later.  In China, they have more immediate utility to use it to move money out of the country, so the spread is higher there, which means the West is forced to trail China and only build support after China has proven that level to be stable.



341. Post 13254192 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

China ate the last dump instead of letting it fall, so it looks like they're trying to build a $450 USD base.



342. Post 13254317 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: aztecminer on December 15, 2015, 10:45:55 AM
thought someone said ealier that finex quit accepting new orders. something about 31 millions longs or something.

It's like when insiders shorted airline stocks before 9/11...except hedging before the bottom drops out of the stock market instead.



343. Post 13261044 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: aztecminer on December 15, 2015, 08:11:23 PM
this is the calm of the first 1000. when the first 1000 appears, it is not long after that the next 1000 appears. it is not long after the next 1000 appears that the first 5000 happens. the Satoshi Nakamoto storm begins soon after the calm has passed .




344. Post 13261544 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Tulsene on December 16, 2015, 12:21:13 AM
P.S if you could short plz!

The price didn't come this far in order to form a double top, whoever thinks whales won't push it higher to avoid a double top has mental retardation.  For anyone who shorts here:




345. Post 13263051 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: peonminer on December 16, 2015, 04:01:40 AM
Holy freaking beartrap batman




346. Post 13263794 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on December 16, 2015, 06:41:17 AM
Y'all can short almost for free because the interest rate is so cheap.  All I have to do is wait


If you actually watched the market live yesterday, you would have noticed China was very determined to absorb the dumps and hold price above $450 USD.  They have no plans to attempt to implode the market at this current level.  I'm definitely not worried about going to sleep with coins at this price.  The buy side is also far more bullish right now on all exchanges than before the dump occurred.  Shorting right now is pointless.  Worst case scenario it goes sideways.



347. Post 13264465 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Bitcoin is going a lot higher.  Even if Bitcoin went to a million dollars each, most people who currently own some would not be able to afford this boat.  Going to $10,000 is still chump change.  That's why it's definitely going there soon:

http://www.denisonyachtsales.com/yacht-broker-listings/?rPage=/privatelabel/listing/pl_boat_detail_handler.jsp?slim=pp284110&units=Feet&boat_id=2866791&primary_photo_id=0&primary_photo_url=http%3A%2F%2Fnewimages.yachtworld.com%2Fresize%2F1%2F2%2F37%2F5260237_20150723185356414_1_XLARGE.jpg&back=%2Fprivatelabel%2Flisting%2Fcache%2Fpl_search_results.jsp%3Fsm%3D3%26cit%3Dtrue%26fromPrice%3D100000000%26




348. Post 13264515 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on December 16, 2015, 09:03:52 AM
after the chinese bot has been shut down volumes are still high so either new bots are in or new real players are in. very very interesting
 Wink

All you need to do is turn on this song and stare at this picture:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBwS66EBUcY






349. Post 13267731 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):




350. Post 13269546 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Interest rate hike is bullish for Bitcoin.  All excess liquidity from 0% interest went to stock buybacks creating a bubble in that market.  It did not create a bubble in Bitcoin.  Bitcoin was in a bear market the entire time from Gox.  

Stocks imploding when liquidity is removed means investors have to leave that market and go to a new one to try and increase or preserve their wealth.  They aren't going to put everything in a bank and make nothing while also having faith in banks at an all time low.



351. Post 13273248 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

People trying to hold it at $450 but didn't really put enough effort into rigging the charts, so it's either a bear trap to squeeze shorts or a drop

edit: bear trap




352. Post 13273352 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Ok...definitely a bear trap.



353. Post 13273549 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: TERA on December 17, 2015, 05:53:42 AM





354. Post 13273668 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: suda123 on December 17, 2015, 06:17:42 AM
How long is it going to take for the economy to collapse from the rate hike?

If you want to collapse faster, you can just go ahead and travel to Venezuela:

This is how 0.037 Bitcoins looks like in Venezuela


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1150751.0



355. Post 13284658 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Looks like some random idiot accidentally hit the wrong button somewhere.



356. Post 13284801 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: equipoise on December 18, 2015, 08:47:54 AM
It seems this is the top. Is it slow bleeding from here or flash crashes? Sooner or later the 300-370 range should be tasted again to confirm a healthy organic grow. To me it seems highly doubtful a new bubble starts now, but who knows.

It sounds like you went full fiat at $230 and are mad the price went up.  Somebody blew up the exchange with an abnormally big sell right at the start of a price rise.  It was either on purpose to try and stop it from rising or they did it on accident.



357. Post 13287586 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

I was right, we are about to do a +10x to $3200




358. Post 13289374 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: flagpara on December 18, 2015, 05:43:25 PM
Well no. I bought when it was low and sold at 450. So the best thing that can happen to me right now is to see price going down like hell so i can buy again =D

But if btc prize go straight up I won't be mad




359. Post 13313328 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):




360. Post 13314246 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: flagpara on December 21, 2015, 08:50:03 AM
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Down a bit. Much better. Isn't it much more fun to have a crazy ass market that can go down 30bbucks in 6 hours without any fucking reason?  Grin

That's why btc can't be used in a global and daily way. But that's also why it's so cool and fun to invest in.


So we can't use fiat either because the Swiss franc went up 30% in one day and caused millions of dollars in loses for people?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/swiss-franc-move-cripples-currency-brokers-1421371654



361. Post 13323680 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.38h):

Quote from: suda123 on December 22, 2015, 07:23:50 AM
What happens to people who are on welfare or government paid housing for poor people if hyperinflation occurs?

All signs point to deflationary collapse.  The govt will then print endless trillions to try and stop it, but none of the money will circulate in local economies.  I'm not really sure what happens at that point.  I'm guessing a mixture of both. Some things will be getting pumped to the moon while others deflate in price.

It seems like the excess printing would eventually have to spill over to the normal economy, but you can probably collapse before that happens, so their printing basically does nothing in that case.



362. Post 13343332 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Bitcoin is going to the moon after they implement these two new taxes:


Rape Culture Tax

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7uVxHLT-aY

Caucasian Tax

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYwY85K1MB0



363. Post 13368572 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):




364. Post 13388641 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on December 29, 2015, 12:20:03 AM
And if that confederate flag waving hick, BJA, wants to cash out and make his life more comfortable for himself and his confederate flag waving children, I think he should be allowed to do so in his own time.

Is Gavin the leader of the confederacy since he tried to secede from the union?

And why are you on a Bitcoin forum in the first place if you're always promoting leftist ideals and now anti-confederacy when the confederacy was the original libertarians of this government?



365. Post 13389235 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on December 29, 2015, 01:14:38 PM
And if that confederate flag waving hick, BJA, wants to cash out and make his life more comfortable for himself and his confederate flag waving children, I think he should be allowed to do so in his own time.

Is Gavin the leader of the confederacy since he tried to secede from the union?

And why are you on a Bitcoin forum in the first place if you're always promoting leftist ideals and now anti-confederacy when the confederacy was the original libertarians of this government?

Because I see Bitcoin as an important and exciting technology rather than the second coming for right wing nutters.

Leftist extremism is not the future.  We've already reached peak leftism, peak government, peak collectivism, peak feminism, etc.  You can only go down from here in your SJW ideology.  If anything, we will return back to the culture of the 1800's and early 1900's after all this garbage collapses.

It's always funny how people advocating these bullshit ideologies don't even know Hitler and Stalin are both technically leftists.  Anarchy is far right and peak government authoritarianism is far left.  It's funny you refer to the "far right" as nutters when leftist collectivism is inherently pro slavery.  One man's free stuff is another man's indentured servitude.



366. Post 13390258 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on December 29, 2015, 01:56:24 PM
And if that confederate flag waving hick, BJA, wants to cash out and make his life more comfortable for himself and his confederate flag waving children, I think he should be allowed to do so in his own time.

Is Gavin the leader of the confederacy since he tried to secede from the union?

And why are you on a Bitcoin forum in the first place if you're always promoting leftist ideals and now anti-confederacy when the confederacy was the original libertarians of this government?

Because I see Bitcoin as an important and exciting technology rather than the second coming for right wing nutters.

Leftist extremism is not the future.  We've already reached peak leftism, peak government, peak collectivism, peak feminism, etc.  You can only go down from here in your SJW ideology.  If anything, we will return back to the culture of the 1800's and early 1900's after all this garbage collapses.

It's always funny how people advocating these bullshit ideologies don't even know Hitler and Stalin are both technically leftists.  Anarchy is far right and peak government authoritarianism is far left.  It's funny you refer to the "far right" as nutters when leftist collectivism is inherently pro slavery.  One man's free stuff is another man's indentured servitude.

It makes no sense to argue politics with you when you're in denial of your own political conviction. Your stance seems completely in line with racist fascism. The fact that you're hiding behind your PC idea of right wing anarchy is just pathetic. Any true classical liberalist would vomit at the thought of you being counted among them.

You're a Marxist-collectivist and use the normal leftist tactic of trying to force your ideology onto everyone then claiming they're a "bad person", "racist", "sexist", blah blah if they don't want to join your collectivist nightmare that's already resulted in the deaths of millions from your last Bolshevik revolution.

Nobody wants to join your SJW bullshit that demonizes males, anyone who isn't poor, white people, etc, the usual common targets.  You have a mental disorder called far leftism where you were dumped into too many trashcans by stronger kids while growing up, so now you can only relate to people deemed underdogs by society and shun anything considered strong or normal.  It's a mental disorder plain and simple.  Stop trying to pretend you're normal and people should adhere to your disorder.



367. Post 13392879 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: aminorex on December 29, 2015, 07:36:08 PM
Monkey gave up on it intraday.  I'm out.

Quote from: r0ach on December 10, 2015, 10:10:02 AM






368. Post 13398005 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

I'm excited by the large amounts of shorts already in ready to be squeezed.  Do these guys ever learn?  It's probably the same people who got squeezed when the price was $330.



369. Post 13398037 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on December 30, 2015, 10:35:35 AM




Lol @ that chart.  I sold at 450 before it went down and hoped it would go to 1 penny so I could rebuy but there was far too much buy support at $400-410.  China pulled out completely to try and crash it on purpose but there was way too much western money to prop it up.  I bought back in at the 420's.  There's also WAY too many shorts already in now that have to buy back in for it to even crash now.  The fact that it's still going up even after all those shorts means the rise is back in business.



370. Post 13400293 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

There's one single guy on Bitfinex with like a 5 million dollar short trying to manipulate downward on that exchange.  He's probably going to get squeezed:

Quote from: r0ach on December 30, 2015, 03:14:38 PM
He was trying to paint the Bitfinex charts to make it look like a crash was going to happen so he wouldn't lose money.  Some hedge fund manager moron or something.  China refused to follow his downward manipulation on Finex because they have longs in at $420-430 and wouldn't budge off their $430 price for a long time.  Bitstamp + Coinbase began to diverge from Finex price and Stamp went all the way up to like $426 while Finex was still $421, so this guy's downward manipulation is probably a fail and he's going to get squeezed.

OKcoin + Huobi + Coinbase + Bitstamp all trying to go up while only Finex is being manipulated down due to some overleveraged hedge fund manager.



371. Post 13402349 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

BTC-E leading in price again.  This fucker trying to manipulate down on Bitfinex to make his $5 million dollar short work is gonna lose if Bitstamp and even BTC-E aren't gonna follow Finex.



372. Post 13407024 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 31, 2015, 07:06:43 AM
even if the blocks are full with bogus transactions.

There's no such thing as a "bogus transaction" or "spam", that's a LukeJr fallacy.  Minimum transaction fee is the anti-spam mechanism of Bitcoin.  Block size is an arbitrary retardation of throughput.  In an actual functioning system, you would want to encourage people to "spam" the blockchain as much as they want as long as they pay transaction fees.  If you want to try and differentiate between certain types of traffic, it means your system is broken.

The problem is not spam, the problem is that Bitcoin probably needs at least a 0.0001 minimum transaction fee, especially if the block size isn't raised.  Zero fee transactions never should have existed in the first place.



373. Post 13407708 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

4MB immediate hard fork is the only viable solution imo.  Then segwit can be used as a bandaid to increase further in the future with or without a fork, effectively taking it to 8MB or so.



374. Post 13409225 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: mavericklm on December 31, 2015, 10:01:38 AM
4MB immediate hard fork is the only viable solution imo.  Then segwit can be used as a bandaid to increase further in the future with or without a fork, effectively taking it to 8MB or so.

nope!

first we need to work on the fact that there are big pools that mine empty blocks

after that, maybe we can jump to 1.5mb or 2mb

IBLT is not a requirement to increase block size.  This is their standard stall strategy where they introduce an endless stream of random variables that just have to be addressed before anything can be changed.  IBLT can be integrated later.

The "oh no, loss of decentralization!" excuse is also ridiculous when block size would need to go pretty huge to outweigh the mining pool centralization that already exists.

I give it around 100 years max before the world is blown up from WW3.  Current block size would be around 1 terabyte by the time that happened vs around 8 terabytes with 8MB blocks.  This is without even having pruning involved.



375. Post 13409708 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: shmadz on December 31, 2015, 01:58:47 PM
I'm still not sure which team to support. "big blockers" or "small blockers".

Still waiting on the team mascots to decide which is better.

Don't bother, this whole argument is just a sham after all...

http://qntra.net/2015/12/the-false-dilemma-of-xt-versus-blockstream/


So I read that and it has lots of words but basically says nothing.  It claims some type of Alex Jones' style "false left/right paradigm", then doesn't even describe a legit pathway forward or how each side is blocking that from occurring.  IMO, Bitcoin will need to scale to at least 8-10MB blocks even with a Lightning Network because the masses have to retain access to the main chain for it to function.



376. Post 13410907 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

The $5 million dollar Finex shorter has now covered and stopped manipulating down.  Time to go up.  Now China manipulators + Finex manipulators both have longs in around 420-430, so it's probably going a lot higher.



377. Post 13427718 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on January 02, 2016, 02:03:01 PM
That's the pathology of (supposedly honest) blockchain bloaters. Refusing to see that increasing the blocksize without providing incentives to dissuade destructive behaviors (from spam attacks to gratuitous crap) is both pointless and suicidal.

The incentive to prevent people from spamming the blockchain is minimum transaction fee.  If people are spamming the blockchain for no reason as an attack vector, it means minimum transaction fee should be higher.  Zero fee transactions never should have existed.  Since finite block size is an open, readily available attack vector, the one thing the small blockers have going for them is, it's inevitable you'll reach a fee market no matter what you set block size to.  I still think Bitcoin needs to scale to around 8-10MB blocks to not have a glass ceiling on price, but it should be able to do that with time.

Also, even though I want block size increased, since the blocks will become full no matter what you set them to, it's probably better to let them fill first to test how the system works and create solutions for whatever problems occur rather than dealing with the same problem at 10 or 20MB blocks later.  So yea, raising the block size isn't really that urgent yet as some people say.



378. Post 13438217 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 03, 2016, 12:02:54 AM
Don't worry. Soon the price will start climbing and we'll all be posting sexist images and throwing poo at each other again.

Do all your posts really have to be pushing Marxist propaganda?  You understand literally nothing about women, zero.  The word sexism implies that men and women are equal, when women are basically large, irrational, overly emotional children.  There's not a single woman walking the earth that respects a guy that thinks a woman is their equal.  Women only marry up.  If you're not stronger, smarter, richer, and basically better than them at everything, they want nothing to do with you unless they're "settling" after old age and desperation.

The simple act of you claiming women are your equal basically removes yourself from the gene pool entirely by admitting you have nothing they want lol.  Since leftism is a mental disorder where people who consider themselves weak and pathetic can only relate to other people or groups deemed by society also as weak, abused, mistreated, under-represented, etc, occasionally two leftists will meet and procreate with each other, then spawn some kids that fail at natural selection and constantly expouse their leftist, communist views continuing the cycle until humanity ends from reverse evolution.



379. Post 13441528 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

I feel like there's some whales on Coinbase that know something I don't.  Some guy earlier was buying coins by the truckload at $430 while Finex was $421.  Now I feel like I'm going to wake up tomorrow and see -70% stock market crash or something.  It's also amazing how much buy support there is at $425.  Anyone waiting for those mythical sub $400 coins is shit out of luck.



380. Post 13454325 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

We need to all vote for Bernie Sanders to make this happen to the price of Bitcoin:




381. Post 13454627 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: flagpara on January 05, 2016, 01:20:17 PM
We need to all vote for Bernie Sanders to make this happen to the price of Bitcoin:



As a non American not following American election cause I don't really give a fuck about your country (no offense though, you can't care about everything) I don't really understand your point. Could you explain?

If we all vote in dysfunctional communists to implode the economy on purpose, the price of Bitcoin rises.  Half the people in this thread are communists (hint: anyone with last name goldstein, goldberger, bergsomething), they will vote for him anyway.  Might as well help pump Bitcoin.



382. Post 13456922 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Elwar on January 05, 2016, 05:34:19 PM
ACCUMULATE metals while they are still artificially depressed! the lower they go the more should buy................ bitcoin is a scam.

Interesting...how much of a discount can I get on my Amazon purchases using metals?

How do I send them my metals from Europe for payment?

25,000 isn't a lot of people, but if they all wanted to spend or send bitcoin in the same hour, they couldn't do it, no matter how much in fees they paid.

At least PMs scale.

How many PM transactions can your local pawn shop do an hour?

You can at least walk into a Subway restaurant and buy food with Bitcoin.  Who takes gold for food?  Nobody?  Maybe some place in India?  Or maybe spending a $1000 gold coin at $1 govt face value?






383. Post 13467901 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

I present to you

BitMutiny: The case for a Bitcoin hostile hard fork 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1317450.0



384. Post 13468169 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: peonminer on January 06, 2016, 07:19:47 PM
I present to you

BitMutiny: The case for a Bitcoin hostile hard fork  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1317450.0
Crypto is done  Cry

Not really, the price per coin would go vastly higher due to increased money velocity and collateral bid system instead of the current mine and dump system.  Holders would strike it rich from increased demand on the float.  



385. Post 13479640 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: 23who23 on January 07, 2016, 09:28:01 PM
I am back and I am short selling this with my house.


nah, that was the guy who bought my last account for 1 btc.

target 380.

Hmmm... he got the house as well?


that's some poor norwegian attempt of humor. norwegians think they are funny, but excel only in cultural fascism.

Nice, I'm Norwegian & Norman descent (same thing).



386. Post 13480140 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Cornbase looking weird




387. Post 13485024 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Bitcoin moon imminent

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1319356.0



388. Post 13505253 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: becoin on January 10, 2016, 10:41:51 AM
theymos is right. If you want to comment the future of XT altcoin you should NOT do it on BTC threads. Open XT altcoin discussion and say whatever you want to say. Nobody will delete your threads.

Raising block size has nothing to do with XT.  You can stop the propaganda lies now.  There's no such thing as centralized Bitcoin development.  Anyone is allowed to create any changes they want and have miners vote for it.



389. Post 13552132 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: Patel on January 14, 2016, 04:44:56 PM
I am predicting a drop to 350 ish fairly soon... then moon within the next 6 months.

I don't see it going to $350 under any circumstance.  If the rally is over, which it might be for a while according to macro wedge breaking trend, then it would find strong support around $410 still.  If there's a dump, that's where it will go.  If a second dump occurred days/a week later after that, it would find big resistance again at 390's.  Worst case scenario would be $360, but would probably require a long time to get there, and by the time it did, would be time to go up again for getting closer to halving.


  




390. Post 13554624 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: tomothy on January 14, 2016, 09:42:51 PM
Mike Hearn's exit mic drop

I find it tough to dispute his arguments. It's getting close to fork or die time...

https://medium.com/@octskyward/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.m7ipd85nk

It's easy as shit to dispute his arguments.  He's basically claiming that if the blocks ever fill up, then Bitcoin has failed.  Since Bitcoin can't scale to world reserve currency without really fucking big blocks (133MB with lightning network and way higher without it), it's pretty much guaranteed to have full blocks and a fee market no matter what you do.  While I do think Bitcoin needs at least 8MB blocks to remove most of the glass ceiling on price, his logic is not sound at all about it succeeding or failing based on blocks being full or not.

That post might impress Bitcoin noobs into thinking there's some type of crisis, but blocks becoming full was always destined to happen from day 1.  The real issue is that Lightning Network does not exist TODAY, and so blocks should be raised so that Bitcoin has more room to grow until that happens, assuming Lightning Network is even the solution to all our problems in the first place.  The way I see it, a collateral bid, deterministic block production system with something like 1001 fixed block producers is the only low hanging fruit I see to solve decentralization and on-chain scaling at the moment:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1317450.0



391. Post 13555771 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.40h):

Quote from: DaRude on January 15, 2016, 01:23:30 AM

Quote
"...if decentralisation is what makes Bitcoin good, and growth threatens decentralisation, then Bitcoin should not be allowed to grow.

Honestly it's hard to disagree with this statement.

Bitcoin is not built for decentralization in the first place.

You can't get decentralization without one of the following:

1) Having users expend PoW to process their own transactions just like how it was done with email.  IOTA doesn't seem to be quantifiable security-wise though...

or

2) A collateral bid (not flat rate), deterministic block production system with a fixed number of nodes where you're required to lock collateral for an extended period of time to be one.  This makes it so decentralization is built in at a protocol level by having a much greater limit on Sybil.  Mining is also really just a subsidized futures contract in the first place where you're required to lock collateral to speculate on it.  

I argued with Gavin that Bitcoin is designed to monopolize due to the following statement below, but he claimed you hit a nash equilibrium by gaining something like 30% hash rate (i forget the exact number).  Either way, my view is that centralization is built-in at a protocol level for PoW.  If he's right, then I guess it would not monopolize, but the pool makeup would probably always resemble something like it currently does with 4-10 major players.

Quote from: r0ach on January 07, 2016, 12:17:20 AM
The end game game theory of PoW is to form a monpoly with greater than 50% hash rate placed in multiple rathole pools (sybil attack) because if you don't do it, someone else can, so it's the only logical move to protect your investment.  In other words, you're accomplishing the attack you seek to prevent (but not executing it) to stop the other guy from doing it.  Since there's no way to know who owns the pools, it's a system of security through obscurity.

While being not so likely, for all you know, Satoshi owns every mining pool that's ever existed.  The point is, the system is designed to monopolize, while also being almost impossible to verify the real state of security of the system at any given time.  If you accept that as a security model, you're also accepting a security model of someone owning over 50% hash rate out in the open.



392. Post 13568888 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: becoin on January 16, 2016, 02:10:00 AM
We'll stick to main bitcoin branch. Period.

If 80%+ hash goes to 2mb AND exchanges go to 2mb, the old branch is going to be worth 0.  Everybody knows it.  People who are claiming otherwise are just flat out lying IMO.  If that happened to Dogecoin or any other coin in the universe, it would be the same.  Bitcoin will be no exception.

If one chain has that much hash power it is not even a contested fork.

Lightning Network has to raise block size higher anyway.  There was never any plan to stay 1mb forever:

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Scalability_FAQ#Doesn.E2.80.99t_Lightning_require_bigger_blocks_anyway.3F



393. Post 13577065 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: peonminer on January 16, 2016, 08:46:49 PM
Shorts covered and we only went up a few $ . . . not good.

There's no reason to be in the market now until the classic fork is priced in.  The fork will drop it temporarily to at least $320, then set for a new halving rally to probably 800+ after it's all over with.



394. Post 13578007 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 16, 2016, 09:39:57 PM
Gmax threatened to rage-quit, too. Mike just beat him to it. Much like the mythical ouroboros...

Don't forget Luke Jr & Gavin.  Basically all of them except maybe Wuille, Garzik, Wladimir have threatened to rage quit if they don't get their way?  Then Peter Todd beat everyone to it and already semi-rage quit when Ghash got 51%.  Can we get a 100% rage quit count if nobody is allowed to be dictator of Bitcoin?



395. Post 13579158 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

It's funny how the dev side has more small blockers, while the speculation side is almost entirely large blockers nowadays.  Why is this?  Because the dev side doesn't understand markets.  People evaluate stocks by things like cash on hand and future expansion prospects.  If blocks are full, this is bad for speculators because you're no longer getting price appreciation from increased utility, but relying entirely on things like Gresham's law to push the price up for your artificial scarcity tokens with people hoarding it.

Relying on price appreciation through artificial scarcity of coin count and block space is a magician's trick.  It may or may not work, because as we all know, things like Litecoin and a million other altcoins exist.  No matter what you believe is the proper technical solution to the problem, the wise speculator, economist, or even honest human being is going to prefer to increase price via increased utility rather than increase solely by trying to recruit people to invest more.  If you're not increasing utility, that's the point where it does turn into kind of a scheme.  Unless you're going to try and claim the markets currently have vastly undervalued Bitcoin, but that's a different argument.

Things like Lightning Network will increase utility a lot by increasing throughput, the only problem is, it's currently nowhere to be seen.  People demand an increase in utility now, otherwise they feel stupid to invest or tell others to do so because it seems like a greater fool theory when utility is not increasing.  This is what the devs do not understand, and Segwit is kinda too little, too late.  This is the reason why I believe the blockchain does need an increase, to allow expansion until something like Lightning Network is released (assuming it works).

The bottom line is, due to the factors cited above, an increase in block size can really only be beneficial for price, assuming it didn't infringe upon decentralization, and you would need very big blocks to centralize things more in comparison to the size of mining pools that already exist.  Whether you're trying to avoid the greater fool theory, or if all you care about is making money and don't give a shit about anything else, you're going to be in the large(r) block camp.



396. Post 13579276 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 17, 2016, 02:08:27 AM
k so lets start up that Choo Chooooooo MOTHER FUCKERS  Grin

This train is going nowhere till after the Bitcoin Classic fork occurs, then it's off to new ATH.  Before/during fork there will be some mega dip to $320 or below probably as people like Popescu come out of the woodwork, then it goes back up again after fork is completed.



397. Post 13579840 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 17, 2016, 03:20:23 AM
bitcoinclassic
kindof a joke...

I look forward to blocksize incress i have debated the issues for  years now! i'v been on both sides of the debate ...  cant wait!

wtf is this bitcoinclassicy thing?

lol wtv

Did you seriously get all happy thinking you scored cheap coins and did not know about a massive hard fork coming with probably 75%+ hash support that's going to temporarily tank price till it's over?



398. Post 13580019 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on January 17, 2016, 03:58:47 AM
wtf r they doing, https://bitcoinclassic.consider.it/  

It's called at any time, anyone can code up whatever changes they want and have miners vote for it.  If only 4 people in one Github have dictatorship over Bitcoin, it would mean it's completely centralized and worthless.  Just like how mining pools come and go, so will github cartels.



399. Post 13585733 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 17, 2016, 11:36:22 AM
And if Satoshi's warning is true that in case of a successful fork he'll be forced to declare Bitcoin a failure (I would probably disassociate my name as well after a hostile takeover and admit defeat) then we have a real problem ahead of us.

This is completely false and a misinterpretation even of the fake Satoshi post.  You're typing flat out propaganda.

The longest chain wins, and if the 2MB fork has something like 80%+ hash power, it is by definition YOU that are the hostile fork because you're in the minority of consensus, while the 2MB is the real chain.  Having access to a github repo does not make you dictator of Bitcoin.  Anyone is allowed to code up whatever changes they want and have miners vote for it.  If they could not do this, Bitcoin would be centralized and worth 0.

You can type a million words, but all posts by you people can be summarized as "I believe 4 people with access to a certain github should be dictators of Bitcoin".  Sorry, but no, that would make Bitcoin worth nothing if that was the case.  World governments would LOVE centralized development as well.  They would just take someone like Luke Jr and

A)  Give him a large check or BFL miner to bribe him.  

or

B) Beat the hell out of him till he does whatever they want or threaten to magically "discover" he's the new Silk Road mastermind.

Since pools come and go, centralized development is an even bigger attack vector than the pools are.



400. Post 13586034 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 17, 2016, 05:16:53 PM
That's more about the technicalities of a normal fork-split situation rather than a social-engineered takeover attempt.

You're using double standards acting like Blockstream pretending they should have dictatorship over Bitcoin isn't a social engineer takeover attempt itself.  Devs don't control Bitcoin.  Devs are politicians and we don't have a one party system.  If we did, Bitcoin would be centralized and worthless.  Whoever wants to rage quit because they don't get to be dictator and do everything their way, let them.  

I'm also tired of people pretending the Lightning Network is actually a sure thing.  I have my doubts about how it will work in the real world, and people like Anonymint claim it won't work at all.  Maybe it will, but people aren't very big into just trusting some group of people that they will maybe someday in the future increase scalability while price could either stagnate or go down until that happens.  Segwit is too little, too late, and LN is too far off.  There has to be some kind of bandaid for investors in the meanwhile until LN can be fully released and evaluated.

And please, don't even pull the "price doesn't matter" bullshit lol.  Bitcoin is a currency, if one of your main development goals isn't to increase it's network effect and value, then you're probably doing it wrong.  A currency is a consensus mechanism between individuals in lieu of barter.  In order to fulfill that goal, the largest number of people possible have to be holders or it's either harder for them to do business, or they can't do business at all.  This means sane Bitcoin development has to constantly be trying to expand capacity to fit more users.  Unless capacity is already high enough for world reserve currency, any stagnation of capacity increase while users are demanding more will be viewed negatively by the market.

There's also no such thing as "spam".  If you think spam exists, it means minimum transaction fee is not set high enough.  Zero fee transactions should not exist in the first place.



401. Post 13586197 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 17, 2016, 05:46:49 PM
If you don't like how bitcoin is you create an altcoin. There is no dictatorship involved.

Correct.  Anything that's not the longest chain is an altcoin.  Everything about Byzantine solutions involves keyword TEMPORARY consensus.  What was once the main chain today is an altcoin tomorrow because it's not the consensus anymore.



402. Post 13586510 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 17, 2016, 05:52:34 PM
Bitcoin is not a viable a longterm store of value, because it has no mechanism to stabilize its value.  (Even if it were truly scarce -- which it isn't -- there are plenty of things that are just as scarce but totally worthless.)

Bitcoin's real value can only be determined by on-chain transaction volume, denominated in number of transactions (assuming transaction fee is above 0), value of average transaction, or both.  If nobody is doing business on-chain, there will be no demand for coins, meaning no liquidity in markets, and price will drop seeking liquidity.  Which is why not raising block size is utterly stupid if you care anything about price with Lightning Network not released yet.

If Lightning Network is ever released and functions, it's technically just bundling the same on-chain transactions, so price would continue to increase with an increase in LN volume, just not with an increase in security from fees being bundled.  Most people would probably argue Bitcoin has enough security already, and mining increasing to the point of infinity where the entire planet is covered by a bitcoin miner is probably not a good idea.



403. Post 13587056 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 17, 2016, 07:10:14 PM
Lauda says really bright folks have done some serious thinking and concluded 4MB with SegWit will put security in danger.

Grave danger, presumably.

If you mean a sigops attack fix, hilariously, it can be fixed with a hard fork, which is what a block size increase is...a hard fork.  The 1MB people like to claim that block size will be raised without a sigops fix done at the same time, claiming Bitcoin would immediately die.  This means a segwit soft fork is inherently more dangerous than a hard fork, while also being more complex.



404. Post 13587867 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 17, 2016, 08:33:10 PM
As for waste, spam, elitism etc, just read the quotes of satoshi in my post above. Was he an elitist or a realist - in terms of how the network operates?

You tried to derail the block size topic with an off-topic post bringing up random Satoshi quotes about micropayments.  Not a single person in the thread mentioned the word "micropayments", and:

Minimum transaction fee is the anti-spam mechanism of Bitcoin, not block size

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1295293.0



405. Post 13588977 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AZwarel on January 17, 2016, 09:24:36 PM
Or only the western white type of poor people?

When I created Bitcoin, I designed it as the world's first welfare system for Caucasian and Asian men, since nobody else was serving that market.



406. Post 13591693 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 18, 2016, 04:19:35 AM
Satoshi's basic mistake was to make the currency non-inflationary.

Anonymint made the same mistake as you, thinking it's somehow more ethical to have an inflationary currency.  I think I have debunked that notion in the link below:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1319681.msg13544160#msg13544160



Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 18, 2016, 03:12:33 AM
I wrote that too before: it became a pyramid investment scheme and a tool for crime.  

You need to lay off the moonshine before typing stuff like this.  All forms of currency are either pyramids or ponzies.  Any finite commodity like gold where you can attempt to corner the market is a pyramid scheme.  Paper money is a Ponzi because the infinite printing fulfills the requirement for needing a continuous stream of investors or you're by definition robbing the others.  The unsustainable requirement of the Ponzi is also fulfilled by the fact that currency is inherently an options contract for goods or services in the future.  The fact that I can just refuse to accept your paper currency and switch to a different currency making you not able to redeem anything gives it an always unsustainable nature each second of the day.  They're nothing but option contract time bombs.

The only honest man's currency is to remove the abstraction and just use flat out barter.  You're making a deal with the devil in order to have more efficient specialization of labor.  And "crime", give me a break.  You can delete every currency that exists and there will still be crime, so what are you even talking about.



407. Post 13598566 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 18, 2016, 06:17:39 PM
Adam Back looks upset.

The hilarious part is:

"Alas I own not a single bitcoin which is kind of ironic as the actual bitcoin mining is basically my hashcash invention…" - Adam Back 2013

This guy is the biggest mystery of all of Bitcoin.  How can you try and preach to everyone how Bitcoin should be run when you own 0 bitcoins, and thus, don't even participate in it's economy?  He doesn't appear to be living in poverty, so he's either:

A) Lying for tax purposes
B) Economically boycotting Bitcoin for some unknown reason
C) Waiting to "buy the dip"




408. Post 13608689 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 19, 2016, 04:39:16 PM
Likewise, if blockchain use was infinite in terms of transaction capacity & storage, why would anyone pay fees?

You do NOT need perma small blocks to make a fee market work because Bitcoin doesn't function properly without a forced minimum transaction fee in the first place.  Gmaxwell doesn't understand economics and is using the WRONG tool for the job.  He's attempting to use block size as both a spam inhibitor and fee market promoter, when it's minimum transaction fee that's designed for both of those purposes.  He's trying to alter the functionality of Bitcoin to be the opposite of how Satoshi created it:

"If we started getting DoS attacked with loads of wasted transactions back and forth, you would need to start paying a 0.01 minimum transaction fee.  0.1.5 actually had an option to set that, but I took it out to reduce confusion.  Free transactions are nice and we can keep it that way if people don't abuse them." - Satoshi

More on that subject here:

Minimum transaction fee is the anti-spam mechanism of Bitcoin, not block size

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1295293.0



409. Post 13609193 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 19, 2016, 07:02:55 PM
"The Final Solution" is coming one way or another.




410. Post 13610587 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 19, 2016, 09:56:07 PM
are Core out of their fucking minds?

I used to give Core the benefit of the doubt and presume it was just an ideological difference, but I've seen them lately in the act of somewhere in between misrepresenting how the sigops attack would affect larger blocks, to flat out lying about it (hint:  the sigops attack is a non-issue because a hard fork is required to fix it and a block size increase is a hard fork).

Once we've gotten to the point of core devs either misrepresenting or lying about the facts on purpose, something is fishy.



411. Post 13632290 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Another average day in Bitcoin.  

China FOMO short squeeze sucker's rally designed solely to margin call MatTheCat then immediately dump after while forum discusses fullblockalypse vs barackalypse.



412. Post 13632342 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: TReano on January 21, 2016, 07:00:35 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2016/01/19/r-i-p-bitcoin-its-time-to-move-on/?postshare=691453395532622&tid=ss_tw


Smiley

Someone like Wences or Keiser should waste a few thousand with paid for media blowing the lid off the fact that Mike Hearn was not an actual core dev.  It would probably really fuck Hearn over and make him wish he never wrote that blog post if it appears that he was misrepresenting who he actually was.  He's not a complete idiot, but his authority figure status over Bitcoin is more similar to some random guy like Peter R than Satoshi.  The articles all pretend like he was running the show.



413. Post 13633700 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Why are people arguing about governance while pretending Bitcoin is anarchy when Bitcoin is identical to the government we already have?  Each mining rig is a vote.  You're required to use your vote at a pool, which is the same thing as electing a representative like congress/senate.  It's a reputation based system and your vote essentially does not matter if all representatives are compromised or not operating with any game plan you want.

It's supposedly "permissionless", but unless you have millions to break through the high barrier of entry to solo mine, then it's not really.  Just like in real life, big money can simply buy their way in as representatives.  I'm not sure where everyone keeps getting these anarchy ideas from when there's almost no difference between Bitcoin and representative type republics.  Looks like convergent evolution strikes again.



414. Post 13636378 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 22, 2016, 01:30:19 AM
(2) property and economical rights of the individual are not absolute but are subordinate to the interests of society as a whole

So you are a communist...

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 22, 2016, 01:30:19 AM
(3) the state is supposed to provide public services like health care, education, social security, transportation infrastructure, emergency and security services, etc.;

So you are a communist...

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 22, 2016, 01:30:19 AM
(4) the state should try to ensure equal opportunities to everybody and ensure that everybody has a decent minimal living conditions.

So you are a communist...



415. Post 13636589 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

The key thing the Stolfinator doesn't understand about being a socialist is, one man's free stuff is another man's indentured servitude.  He keeps preaching this "more just society" nonsense while supporting a pro-slavery ideology.



416. Post 13644617 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on January 22, 2016, 03:04:51 PM
Read the Communist Manifesto if you want to know what Communism is.

Read Industrial Society and It's Future if you want to know about socialism/communism and why leftism is a mental disorder:

http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt



417. Post 13644644 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

It's dumping till hard fork issue is resolved.  Looks like Bitfury is back on-board the fork train, and the Chinese are still discussing it.



418. Post 13700219 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 28, 2016, 04:01:02 AM
Who has been holding from $502, $475, $465, and $428? 

When are you gonna sell? at $350? 300? 200?

Price can't go up because transaction volume can't go up. It's that simple, so unless you know about some secret deal between core, nodes and miners to increase capacity, enjoy watching the value of your holdings slowly deteriorate.

Lightning Network isn't priced in at all, so assuming it ever comes out and functions, that will be a huge bump for price even with 1.6MB blocks.



419. Post 13702190 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 28, 2016, 08:27:25 AM
So kiddies, let's review:

What are the elements of a four punch raid?

Crash (to $352)? check
Bounce? check
pause? check
Spike (to $428)? check
second bounce (at $371)? check

so what's left? oh, that's right. A gradual loss of all upward momentum leading to the next crash.



Price can't go up because the threat of a hard fork.  Even a non-contested fork would cause dump till it's over.



420. Post 13866825 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

If anyone remembers my post in October, I went all in at $230 and posted a couple days later:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1200114.0

I was fully out at $44x.  Now I'm back all in at $375.


<r0ach> I believe Armstrong said gold would crater to lowest in Q1 2016, but I might be mistaken
<r0ach> and gold has bottomed then rose
<r0ach> so that might signal the end of the btc drop as well
<r0ach> meanwhile, Harvey Dent said gold would hit $700, hopefully he did not trade on his own advice
<r0ach> Faber says gold to "possibly" $2000 in 2016, so Bitcoin should do similar large gains as well
<r0ach> the fact that people in london are standing in lines in the street for gold seems like Harvey Dent commodity collapse is a tad off
<r0ach> both Bitcoin and gold are more of a currency than commodity anyway, so a deflationary collapse with
<r0ach> liquidity crisis doesn't just make them go down with other commodities
<r0ach> they can benefit from liquidity crunch just like the USD



421. Post 13866938 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

The price is likely to rise again on Monday as China gets back from holiday, combined with the fact that gold seemed to have bottomed and started to increase, and the Yuan is supposed to be devalued by like 30-40%, so I went all in at $375 and already up $10 a coin.  No matter how much bullshit BJA says, there are too many positive external factors on price right now to be that dangerous to hold.  The Yuan devaluation thing alone is yuge and might turn out to just be shoveling free money at you by holding BTC.

A halving + huge yuan devaluation at the same time?  Are you shitting me?  It's like god himself is trying to increase the BTC price.  Even if the blockchain stopped and never worked again it would probably go up.



422. Post 13876917 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: r0ach on February 13, 2016, 02:22:45 AM
If anyone remembers my post in October, I went all in at $230 and posted a couple days later:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1200114.0

I was fully out at $44x.  Now I'm back all in at $375.

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on February 13, 2016, 02:30:34 AM
This gone be good.

And it was good.



423. Post 13887847 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: hf100 on February 14, 2016, 11:10:22 AM
Why's it gone over $400 on stamp? Is there no real reason or has something happened to pump up the price? I can't find any giant events that are responsible for it like the US government has decided to ditch the dollar and switch to using nothing but bitcoin.

Because:

Quote from: r0ach on February 13, 2016, 02:22:45 AM
If anyone remembers my post in October, I went all in at $230 and posted a couple days later:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1200114.0

I was fully out at $44x.  Now I'm back all in at $375.


<r0ach> I believe Armstrong said gold would crater to lowest in Q1 2016, but I might be mistaken
<r0ach> and gold has bottomed then rose
<r0ach> so that might signal the end of the btc drop as well
<r0ach> meanwhile, Harvey Dent said gold would hit $700, hopefully he did not trade on his own advice
<r0ach> Faber says gold to "possibly" $2000 in 2016, so Bitcoin should do similar large gains as well
<r0ach> the fact that people in london are standing in lines in the street for gold seems like Harvey Dent commodity collapse is a tad off
<r0ach> both Bitcoin and gold are more of a currency than commodity anyway, so a deflationary collapse with
<r0ach> liquidity crisis doesn't just make them go down with other commodities
<r0ach> they can benefit from liquidity crunch just like the USD

And:

Quote from: r0ach on February 13, 2016, 02:48:37 AM
The price is likely to rise again on Monday as China gets back from holiday... and the Yuan is supposed to be devalued by like 30-40%.  The Yuan devaluation thing alone is yuge and might turn out to just be shoveling free money at you by holding BTC.

A halving + huge yuan devaluation at the same time?  Are you shitting me?  It's like god himself is trying to increase the BTC price.  Even if the blockchain stopped and never worked again it would probably go up.

Since China is the driving market currently, we will kinda get the equivalent of a secondary bonus halving at the same time as the real one.



424. Post 13912649 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: r0ach on October 29, 2015, 08:36:22 PM
Breaking News:  China has declared war on fiat!









425. Post 13994851 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: Morecoin Freeman on February 24, 2016, 12:30:16 PM
billyjoeallen still bearish? Close your shorts already. Don't be greedy. You will not get a better price anytime soon.

Pretty sure he shorted at like $380, so whatever he's covering with is deep red, not "don't be greedy with those gains" lol.

Speaking of bad trades, I wonder if the Matt in this story is MatTheCat:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-23/suicidal-trader-loses-everything-launches-online-begging-site



426. Post 14019879 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: toknormal on February 26, 2016, 10:34:35 AM

Looks to me like BTC lift-off around early to mid next week (if not before).





427. Post 14136783 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: ZyclonRacerX on March 08, 2016, 03:15:30 PM
Curious fact #2: Sending bitcoin to developing countries is stupid, that's why almost no one does it

Bitcoin is designed for Russian oligarchs to send millions of dollars over their cell phone while standing on the helicopter pad of their yacht.



428. Post 14136842 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 08, 2016, 04:08:32 PM
the clock is ticking, and Vitalik Buterin is writing 1000's lines a minute trying to takeover

You can't be serious.  Ethereum is the biggest scam seen in cryptocurrency so far:

The Ethereum Paradox

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0



429. Post 14136950 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 08, 2016, 04:13:19 PM
the clock is ticking, and Vitalik Buterin is writing 1000's lines a minute trying to takeover

You can't be serious.  Ethereum is the biggest scam seen in cryptocurrency so far:

The Ethereum Paradox

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0

this just proves market dont favor "technically superior" solutions.

It's not about technically superior.  People claim things like Dogecoin are "scam coins", but Dogecoin actually functions.  Ethereum will not be commercially viable for it's intended purpose, meaning it's value will likely eventually be zero, while things like Dogecoin and whatevercoin could linger on for decades.  Ethereum is an actual scam coin.



430. Post 14148981 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

This post is for everyone that claims the fee market "breaks down" by altering block size.  I had been pushing this issue a lot lately, so hopefully I was of some persuasion in removing 0-fee transactions in 0.12.0.

Quote from: r0ach on March 09, 2016, 06:47:35 AM
I don't believe the tragedy of the commons argument is a valid one because Bitcoin never existed in "the commons" as something like a lake in the first place due to one obvious reason, it's a for-profit system managed by central bankers.  For Bitcoin to not have central bankers, it would require no maximum block size and no min transaction fee.  The problem here is, one of those variables is required to be constrained to prevent spam attacks, so you'll always have central bankers in Bitcoin.

The current devs seem obsessed with utilizing block size as the spam prevention mechanism of Bitcoin solely to try and give the appearance of Bitcoin having no central bankers, when block size is only arbitrary throughput constraint.  Minimum transaction fee is the real spam prevention tool for the job.  They just haven't utilized it because they want to pretend there's no central bankers in the system when it's obviously required.

From a miner's perspective, it's in their best interest to vote for the highest minimum transaction fee that the network will bear.  From a developer's engineering viewpoint, it's in their interest to set it to a level to prevent spam or attacks from constantly filling up blocks to create a permanent backlog.  They both have authority to do so, and both of these interests clearly point to a minimum transaction fee higher than zero, so a Bitcoin dev that isn't advocating a minimum transaction fee for each block size interval isn't fulfilling his role well IMO.

If you take these previous points as fact, there will obviously not be any marginal cost doomsday event by raising block size because the system already required central bankers to work in the first place.  Whether you agree or disagree about millions of other Larimer issues, he got it right when saying Bitcoin is a decentralized business or corporation, not a public good.  My semantics might also be wrong and you might be able to classify them as "decentralized bankers".  It's kind of unknown territory.  Regardless, there is governance and profit structure built in where it's not an unmanaged dumping ground.



431. Post 14152694 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 09, 2016, 07:32:57 PM
This post is for everyone that claims the fee market "breaks down" by altering block size:

I don't believe the tragedy of the commons argument is a valid one because Bitcoin never existed in "the commons" as something like a lake in the first place due to one obvious reason, it's a for-profit system managed by central bankers.  For Bitcoin to not have central bankers, it would require no maximum block size and no min transaction fee.  The problem here is, one of those variables is required to be constrained to prevent spam attacks, so you'll always have central bankers in Bitcoin.

The current devs seem obsessed with utilizing block size as the spam prevention mechanism of Bitcoin solely to try and give the appearance of Bitcoin having no central bankers, when block size is only arbitrary throughput constraint.  Minimum transaction fee is the real spam prevention tool for the job.  They just haven't utilized it because they want to pretend there's no central bankers in the system when it's obviously required.

From a miner's perspective, it's in their best interest to vote for the highest minimum transaction fee that the network will bear.  From a developer's engineering viewpoint, it's in their interest to set it to a level to prevent spam or attacks from constantly filling up blocks to create a permanent backlog.  They both have authority to do so, and both of these interests clearly point to a minimum transaction fee higher than zero, so a Bitcoin dev that isn't advocating a minimum transaction fee for each block size interval isn't fulfilling his role well IMO.

If you take these previous points as fact, there will obviously not be any marginal cost doomsday event by raising block size because the system already required central bankers to work in the first place.  Whether you agree or disagree about millions of other Larimer issues, he got it right when saying Bitcoin is a decentralized business or corporation, not a public good.  My semantics might also be wrong and you might be able to classify them as "decentralized bankers".  It's kind of unknown territory.  Regardless, there is governance and profit structure built in where it's not an unmanaged dumping ground.

there doesn't need to be a min fee set

miners can just not include transactions below a min fee of there own and just ignor TX below this min fee

also the bigger the block the higher chance of getting orphaned ( if 2 poeple fine a block at the same time the smaller one will propagate faster and win) so right there the miners NEED to keep a balance between the fees they add to the block and the size it makes that block increasing chances of getting orphaned.

nothing needs to be centrally planned...

Due to economy of scale and some miners having lower verification costs, it creates a race to the bottom of purging all but the most efficient miner (centralization).  With increasing block sizes, there would likely be some huge miner that accepts 0.00000001 fee transactions while doing so would cause others to go bankrupt.  Or the mega miner could just accept tiny or 0 fee transactions in the short term in order to bankrupt opponents.  Hence a minimum transaction fee puts a floor on how low of a race to the bottom tactic you can enact.  

Minimum transaction fee is the spam prevention mechanism of Bitcoin, not block size!  The miners are unable to create one themselves because it would require collusion and it's also an attack vector they use against each other!  That is why I say developers have to create a minimum transaction fee for each block size interval they set in order to scale Bitcoin.



432. Post 14153249 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: AliceGored on March 10, 2016, 06:48:02 AM
Due to economy of scale and some miners having lower verification costs, it creates a race to the bottom of purging all but the most efficient miner (centralization).  With increasing block sizes, there would likely be some huge miner that accepts 0.00000001 fee transactions while doing so would cause others to go bankrupt.  Or the mega miner could just accept tiny or 0 fee transactions in the short term in order to bankrupt opponents.  Hence a minimum transaction fee puts a floor on how low of a race to the bottom tactic you can enact.  

Minimum transaction fee is the spam prevention mechanism of Bitcoin, not block size!  The miners are unable to create one themselves because it would require collusion and it's also an attack vector they use against each other!  That is why I say developers have to create a minimum transaction fee for each block size interval they set in order to scale Bitcoin.

Oh wise central planners. Please pick the best arbitrary economic variables possible... and only with unanimous neckbeard consensus in irc. These miners are hell bent on choking out this golden goose given the chance.

You keep looking but you can't find the woods
While you're hiding in the trees



Except you don't understand it's impossible for Bitcoin to not have central bankers unless it has an unlimited block size and no min transaction fee.  Now that we've established Bitcoin already has central bankers (the developers with the miners having a veto override), they should actually use the correct variable in order to block spam (min transaction fee) instead of using the wrong one (block size).



433. Post 14153441 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: AliceGored on March 10, 2016, 08:03:51 AM
Due to economy of scale and some miners having lower verification costs, it creates a race to the bottom of purging all but the most efficient miner (centralization).  With increasing block sizes, there would likely be some huge miner that accepts 0.00000001 fee transactions while doing so would cause others to go bankrupt.  Or the mega miner could just accept tiny or 0 fee transactions in the short term in order to bankrupt opponents.  Hence a minimum transaction fee puts a floor on how low of a race to the bottom tactic you can enact.  

Minimum transaction fee is the spam prevention mechanism of Bitcoin, not block size!  The miners are unable to create one themselves because it would require collusion and it's also an attack vector they use against each other!  That is why I say developers have to create a minimum transaction fee for each block size interval they set in order to scale Bitcoin.

Oh wise central planners. Please pick the best arbitrary economic variables possible... and only with unanimous neckbeard consensus in irc. These miners are hell bent on choking out this golden goose given the chance.

You keep looking but you can't find the woods
While you're hiding in the trees



Except you don't understand it's impossible for Bitcoin to not have central bankers unless it has an unlimited block size and no min transaction fee.  Now that we've established Bitcoin already has central bankers (the developers with the miners having a veto override), they should actually use the correct variable in order to block spam (min transaction fee) instead of using the wrong one (block size).

That's like saying it's not possible to have a McLaren F1 without the Ameritech front bumperettes and a 1.8L. It is, and it's worth insisting on.

Nonsensical response.



434. Post 14153897 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: AliceGored on March 10, 2016, 08:30:45 AM
That's like saying it's not possible to have a McLaren F1 without the Ameritech front bumperettes and a 1.8L. It is, and it's worth insisting on.

Nonsensical response.

For someone who sees international jewry as the malevolent force behind all their personal socioeconomic shortcomings, you sure suffer from an occasional lack of imagination.

They're an ethnocentric, racial supremacist cult that inserts themselves into positions of power using extreme nepotism, causing the native inhabitants of whatever country they invade to have their wealth siphoned off and their media inundated with propaganda to help their self serving and/or Marxist agenda.  Anyone that claims otherwise is a bullshit artist.



435. Post 14178028 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: Tzupy on March 12, 2016, 01:51:31 PM
We are approaching an inflection point, the next couple of hours might make the bears happy... Wink

Another account sold to the jew bankers.  Look at his post history.  Nothing but "omg btc is gonna crash" spam for like the last year.




436. Post 14187575 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Andre# on March 13, 2016, 05:56:50 PM

"Xapo President Ted Rogers Blasts Blockstream And Mentions Ethereum"

http://bitcoinist.net/xapo-president-ted-rogers-blasts-blockstream-and-mentions-ethereum/


VCs and banks drank the koolaid and actually believe eth can be a comercially viable product.  It can't.  They're taking Vitalik's word for it because somebody told them he was a genius.  The entire purpose of eth is redundantly executed code, which means god awful scaling and low load capacity.  For it to be used by more than a handful of people, they would have to use a partitioned network, but:

A)  Partitioning defeats the entire purpose of redundantly executed code giving Eth no reason to exist

B)  It's not actually possible for them to do so.  There are limits to distributed systems like CAP theorem, just like the laws of physics, that don't allow you to do things without making huge tradeoffs.

C)  Any recursive system without outside entropy is by definition a permissioned ledger and not anti-fragile.  It's not a decentralized currency, just a company that likely illegaly sold shares for a non-viable product bypassing normal channels to do so.  Same thing with garbage like Factcom.



437. Post 14215516 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Why are people still talking about block size?  Isn't Segwit + 2mb fork already agreed upon by core anyway?  Segwit to near 2mb soon and the hardfork would raise it to 4mb in 2017?  If the schnor multisig savings plays out, then you could get something like 56 TPS at 4mb.



438. Post 14250920 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Tzupy on March 19, 2016, 05:02:05 PM
IMO chances are high that the big triangle will break down tomorrow.

Except your account was sold and is now run by some Zionist banker shills.  Entire post history is "omg price is crashing to $1 tomorrow!



439. Post 14251390 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Tzupy on March 15, 2016, 11:01:40 PM
Of course, I am counting on a failed test to break 450$, and then a nice crash. Grin

Your posts are dog shit because you're just a flat out propagandist liar.  This is the only one where you even speak a glimmer of truth, that you want the price to crash so you can buy.  You don't actually think the price is going to crash, you just spam non-stop "omg the price is going to crash to $1 at any second" praying that it does.

People who do nothing but lie 24 hours a day are called sociopaths and psychopaths.  The fact that you think this is acceptable behavior means you are a trash human and should probably do some self introspection to fix yourself.  Whether someone is my friend or enemy, I have no need to lie to either.




440. Post 14253006 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

The continuous stream of spam accts posting is because they think by constantly posting "omg sell now price going to $1" that they can actually move the market to go margin long before halving.



441. Post 14318905 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Are you jibblets still arguging about block size? holy shit...

Last time I checked, core was going along with a 2mb hard fork in 2017, so segwit + that = 4mb.  That's fine for the foreseeable future.  Around 8mb is where I see most of the glass ceiling on price coming off, and that's the next stop after 4mb.

There's nothing to discuss anymore about block size.



442. Post 14324746 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

For the 500th time, 4mb blocks are already coming.  There is nothing left to discuss about block size for the foreseeable future.



443. Post 14325036 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

After months of reading Billyjoe posts about block size, readers finally discovered his true identity:




444. Post 14325118 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 26, 2016, 05:25:57 PM
Are you referring to the hong kong roundtable resolution or something else?

Quote from: maaku7
It is most likely that around this time next year we should be working out the details of a 2MB hard fork on top of the already deployed segwit code.

http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-miners-back-proposed-timeline-for-2017-network-hard-fork/

"“SegWit is expected to be released in April 2016."

The code for the hard-fork will, therefore, be available by July 2016."

"If there is strong community support, the hard-fork activation will likely happen around July 2017.” " (activates between 70-80% hash power I think)



445. Post 14328195 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on March 27, 2016, 12:26:21 AM
my body is ready bitcoin

wall on huobi at 2500btc
O_O
bid or ask?

Was 3k btc, Ask!

1.5k now..

Which means it's just some annoying chinaman trying to get people to sell so he can go long before halving.



446. Post 14336419 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Me on the next Russian crypto scheme (after Eth).

IOTA - Permissioned ledger Russian extortion scheme

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1414866.0



447. Post 14338356 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 27, 2016, 01:49:54 AM
grrr
come on over to https://bitco.in/forum/threads/wall-observer.27/page-59
please?

But the forum layout is ass.  It's like if someone recommends you listen to R&B music and you have to tell them R&B stands for rape and burglary.  Billyjoe and all the forum jews probably love it (oh, who am I kidding, that's 99% of the forum).



448. Post 14359423 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Segwit soon + 2mb fork being scheduled by core = around 4mb blocks during 2017, there's nothing to discuss about block size unless you demand 8mb now.



449. Post 14368613 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: mmitech on March 30, 2016, 05:44:45 PM
Bitstamp will be adding ETH soon, a source (a credible one) told me yesterday that the implementation is done and they are just testing and tweaking things at the moment... you know what is funny, I posted this on /r/ethtrader daily discussion and I got so many down votes, one went so far telling me I am trading my books Cheesy this just gives you a hint about people trading position.

Lol, so what if they add it?  It will just make themselves look stupid for adding a scamcoin like when Bitfinex added Darkcoin.

In 40 pages not a damn person can put up an argument for why Eth isn't a dysfunctional scam because the coin doesn't and can't work:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0




450. Post 14379613 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Wow, new Microsoft AI chatbot got so smart that Microsoft had to shut it down:




451. Post 14379774 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Tzupy on March 31, 2016, 07:47:01 PM
Plenty of permabulls here, happy to post bullish news, I'm just playing for the other team. Cheesy
About market direction, IMO if during the next 2 days there won't be a pump that turns 6h MACD to positive, then we'll crash.
If there will be a pump, we'll still crash after that, but from a higher price point... Grin

Just like the shill known as Kwukduck, you have constantly predicted "crash" after "crash" for like a year, yet the price just keeps going up.  Now, with a halving coming, when only a complete idiot thinks the price can go down, you still spam the same shit.



452. Post 14382732 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 31, 2016, 08:04:54 PM
Good articles. I think the PoS∕PoW discussion is next on the list when the scaling issue has been resolved. Hopefully Athereum will have shown that PoS can work by then.

The problem is that closed entropy systems are permissioned ledgers because:

Quote from: r0ach on March 31, 2016, 01:01:41 AM
You can define Bitcoin in one sentence:

The purpose of mining is to create a permanent two way peg, decentralized exchange, which thus results in a permissionless system.




453. Post 14382858 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 01, 2016, 03:01:35 AM
its really hard to understand what your saying
POS is 'permissioned ledgers'
where is the central authority?
who gives permission?


You cannot interact with the PoS system without acquiring the native currency.  This is a permissioned step in PoS but not PoW.  You have a gateway into the uᴉoɔʇᴉq network even by hashing via pen and paper.  More on the subject below:


Quote from: r0ach on March 31, 2016, 12:06:27 AM
The network effect is a double edged sword that causes this extortion/coercion in a system that isn't permissionless.  In uᴉoɔʇᴉq, you can go straight to the system itself and pluck the money off the tree.  It never ends, you can always do this.  It has removed friction from the economic system by removing the ability of the middle men to insert themselves and extort you.  The fact that it has permanent coin turnover means uᴉoɔʇᴉq is essentially always running a decentralized exchange in the background to allow you to always bypass humans and you will always be paying fair market price.  In permissioned systems, that's not the case.  Most people don't even realize uᴉoɔʇᴉq has it's own decentralized exchange, but it does.

Since, like I said, money is a unitary instrument, an engineering problem to create a decentralized price peg so that you can say 1 hat = 1/10th a chicken, the entire purpose of money's existence is to become a monopoly.  If the money is built by design as a permissioned ledger, it's usefulness to any person or nation on earth will be minimal and negative if it was to become a monopoly because it's too wide open to abuse.  It will either not be adopted at all, or scammers will try to force it onto people to extort them.  A permissionless system would have mutual value for all parties involved.

The main reason a country would want to resist a real permissionless currency, is so they can do things like devalue it to raise their exports, thus cheating other nations via currency wars.  There is a Nash equilibrium in every country adopting the permissionless currency to prevent each other from doing this.

Quote from: r0ach on March 30, 2016, 03:55:11 PM
In the Austrian school of money, "money" is required to have scarcity, but because money is a unitary instrument, it's also required to have accessibility.  Gold accomplishes this permissionless and unitary system because most any nation can acquire it, even if they have to go straight down a few miles.

When I say, "unitary instrument", it's because you have to have a price peg in which all other objects are pegged to so that you can say "one chicken = 1/10th a hat".  uᴉoɔʇᴉq follows and actually improves upon gold in this case of accessibility.  It can be acquired wherever you want, and the accessibility never stops due to permanent coin turnover via transaction fee block reward.  If there is no accessibility, there can be no unitary price peg, and the entire thing just turns into an extortion scheme, so here we are in this thread.

The way uᴉoɔʇᴉq is designed is honestly somewhat of a work of art by someone with the understanding of a renaissance man.  




454. Post 14394847 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 01, 2016, 03:30:28 AM
because i need the coin to mine the coin the its a permissioned leger?

I explained earlier.  Forget trying to analyze what PoS is (a recursive, closed loop system).  Instead figure out why Bitcoin actually is a decentralized currency.  The answer is:

The purpose of mining is to create a permanent two way peg, decentralized exchange, which thus results in a permissionless system.

Once you remove the mechanism of a permanent 2 way peg with our world and the computer world, it turns into a closed entropy system, which is the equivalent of 1's and 0's being trapped on a floppy disk and not decentralized anymore.

It's the difference between a living and evolving organism vs a video game AI script.



455. Post 14394924 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 02, 2016, 04:22:18 AM
being fully honest, i have simply dont understand what your saying, maybe my view is too high level. to me you either prove you computing power  (POW) or you prove your economic power ( POS)

i think we'd need a face to face discussion with a blackboard to understand your point.

Do you understand that the act of mining itself is technically a decentralized exchange?  Most people don't know Bitcoin has a decentralized exchange, but that's exactly what it is.  It's a permanent decentralized exchange because the block reward is subsidized by transaction fees so you can always go straight to the tree itself to pluck off coins.  If you remove this peg, it becomes a closed entropy system and is no longer decentralized, but only a distributed, permissioned ledger.

If you want to use the system, you require native tokens, and in a closed entropy system, you're at the mercy of whoever owns them to extort you.  In Bitcoin, it's an open-entropy, permissionless ledger, so this is not the case.  This means the only way you could actually define closed entropy systems is basically companies or businesses.  The nash equilibrium is then lost for much of their use case.



456. Post 14395012 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 02, 2016, 04:37:31 AM
i think i get it....
i just feel the line you draw between decentralized and distributed is very thin, and almost not worth considering, in the end both systems  solve the double spend problem...

It gets more technical because the open entropy aspect is the only reason much of the consensus system works.  For instance, in PoS, a large holder can cause permanent preemption and just shut the chain down forever.  There is no such thing as "forever" in an open entropy system for him to do that.

There is also no real fault or state recovery in PoS because you have to reference the parts that have already failed in order to continue.  Like I said, the concept of things begin stuck in a state of "forever" is usually a negative in terms of security.  Also, like I said earlier, you need native tokens to utilize the system, and since the system has a decentralized exchange (mining), then anyone can acquire them at fair market price.  For a system of closed entropy, the coins are shut off and it's basically a system of permanent extortion by whoever owns them, assuming the network effect is able to force others into the system.



457. Post 14403025 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Oblodo on April 02, 2016, 08:42:31 PM
Hi hi, you primitive nationalist you. I forget sometimes that some groups of eukaryotes are so stupid that they believe in lines on maps.. We live on the same fucking planet, and have evolved from the same cells. Talking about who's "best" is stupid.

In the same amount of time it took to change wolves to dogs, some groups of humans have been isolated from each other that long.  There are obvious differences in groups and it would be illogical if there wasn't.



458. Post 14411042 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 03, 2016, 10:56:24 AM
No. Evolution has stopped in humans. It basically stopped with regards to potential intelligence before we left Africa.

Oh, wonderful Marxists, if only the Aboriginal people didn't exist to hilariously invalidate every word out of your mouth.  The average IQ tested is in the 60's and no matter how much money is thrown at them, makes nearly no difference.  A large portion of the group went extinct due to being the only modern day humans that couldn't invent fire.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/8688531/Billions-spent-on-Australias-Aborigines-yield-dismal-results.html

Even looking at the skull difference between an Aboriginal and European, you need to be both stupid and a liar to claim there's "no genetic differences".  The skull on the left is AFTER 1800's, it's not from millions of years ago.  There's a clear divergence of species going on here:





459. Post 14412671 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 03, 2016, 04:59:15 PM
I think he might be "special". One of those kids who dropped out of the Derek Zoolander Institute.

It's always fun listening to your diversity nonsense when you don't seem to know anything about human sociology.  There's no such thing as a "majority" and "minority" within a nation.  Nations are always based on ethnocentric majorities.  Either the minority group integrates and essentially ceases to exist, one group is eliminated through war, or the nation splits and goes their separate ways.  Even with all the insane Marxist propaganda you and your people try to push on "the goy", the intermarriage rates between Caucasians and Africans is so miniscule, that integration is clearly a failure and not going to ever happen even with coercion.  And why would the two groups integrate?  White genes are recessive, so by integrating, you would essentially be committing suicide on purpose.

But there's not a whole lot of benefit in Africans being unwilling participants in this forced collectivism either.  Since not all blacks are entirely puppets of Jewish, Marxist propaganda, used as tools to try and further different motives, they realized these facts as well.  Rather than being cattled into forced collectivism, which will obviously never work, people like Marcus Garvey wanted a "pans-africa" movement, or simply going back to Africa instead to live as the majority there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Garvey

Instead, what we really have going on today, is Jewish terrorists like George Soros funding "black lives matter" to use them as pawns.  When the majority of America notices the financial system imploding, George Soros knows exactly who we're going to come looking for.  He funds black lives matter with millions of dollars to try and create a buffer, or more immediate, tangible problem in front of you so you're too busy to go after people like him.  That's all "black lives matter" is, a buffer, a group being used as pawns.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/14/george-soros-funds-ferguson-protests-hopes-to-spur/?page=all

More on the life of people like George Soros:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2626002/posts

Good job "buffer" idiots!:



What is there to gain by "young niggas inciting riots"?  Absolutely nothing.  You'll always be a second class citizen by being a minority in a majority country.  Just like a white person expects to be treated differently as a second class citizen by going somewhere like China.  You can either go after people like Soros instead and be a slightly wealthier second class citizen, or go somewhere where you're the majority and not be one.  You'll still likely have to deal with people like Soros first before leaving, because he will come wherever you go:

"Soros has at various times attacked the currencies of Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Mexico, coming into newly opened financial markets which have little experience with foreign investors, let alone ones with large funds like Soros. Soros begins buying stocks or bonds in the local market, leading others to naively suppose that he knows something they do not. As with gold, when the smaller investors begin to follow Soros, driving prices of stocks or whatever higher, Soros begins to sell to the eager new buyers, cashing in his 40% or 100% profits, then exiting the market, and often, the entire country, to seek another target for his speculation. This technique gave rise to the term "hit and run." What Soros always leaves behind, is a collapsed local market and financial ruin of national investors. "



460. Post 14414483 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: blunderer on April 03, 2016, 09:26:46 PM
Yup.


This is why women were never allowed in the political process for thousands of years.  Each one in the picture is basically just a large, naive child, but women never actually grow out of this.  They could be 16 or 30, it doesn't matter.  You may as well allow 10 year olds to vote and witness the devastation that occurs afterwards.



461. Post 14414741 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: bargainbin on April 03, 2016, 10:09:13 PM
The girls can't help it, refugee D too girthy, too massive, too strong Sad



Who the hell is this poster, seriously?  Another Lambchop account?  Anita Sarkeesian?  Some random, new age, Jewess socialist trying to seduce goys?  I'm not sure what the Occam's Razor choice is for Lambchop between paid JIDF spammer, Southern Poverty Law Center spammer, Blythe Masters, or just some weirdo with too much free time.

After these bullshit posts, probably an average Lambchop day regardless:




462. Post 14415483 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Oh, I get it, everyone that lives in a worse country than the first world west is a refugee!  In that case, everyone can just pile in until those countries aren't first world anymore.  The problem is solved by having no first world countries!  Just have 14 kids and jump the fence so we can get this problem sorted out.



463. Post 14451157 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Halving guide for noobs: Why it's not possible for halving to be priced in now

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1428863.0



464. Post 14458452 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on April 07, 2016, 12:49:40 PM
Saw this link on /r/bitcoin, interesting stuff.

http://meaningness.com/metablog/geeks-mops-sociopaths

Completely irrelevent for Bitcoin though, since the entire purpose of a currency is to become a monopoly, a consensus mechanism for exchange.  The less of a monopoly it has, the less useful it is.  Your link argues popularity weakens the idea, so the article is inverse to how Bitcoin actually works.  Don't try and conflate grunge music and economics.  People like money to be as boring and predictable as possible, not "cool".  Just like when you open your refrigerator, you don't want to have to guess what's edible or not.  That's definitely not cool.



465. Post 14459574 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: bargainbin on April 07, 2016, 06:16:01 PM
Calculated (theoretical) Usefulness: Useless.

How much can I get paid to join your Zionist banker shill spam campaign.  I think me and the Jews have lots in common:




466. Post 14460634 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: bargainbin on April 07, 2016, 08:10:36 PM
Calculated (theoretical) Usefulness: Useless.

How much can I get paid to join your Zionist banker shill spam campaign.  I think me and the Jews have lots in common:

[img ]http://i.imgur.com/1jEZzrA.jpg[/img]

Oy gavalt! Another race traitor goy trying to sell out Shocked

We covetous Jews don't want no meeskait scurrying household pests, lol.
Sugar & baking soda on you and your family.

The hofjuden intermarried with English nobility.  Since I'm related to William the 1st, all you need to do is bring over a big sack of money, we get married, then just need to get rid of like 1000 people in England and I'm king.  Don't you want to fast track this new world order?  We can start as many wars as you want, just brings lots of money.

I've already written a white paper on the subject:

Why war is good

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162791.0



467. Post 14461852 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: USB-S on April 08, 2016, 12:18:39 AM
What if a major botnet would cryptolocker its zombies? How much would that affect the price?
I mean technically cryptolocker software would force new users into the network.




468. Post 14462174 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: USB-S on April 08, 2016, 12:43:17 AM
You could get 10k zombies for your botnet at the cost of 2 bitcoins at hackforums. If you set the cryptolocker unlock price at around 1bitcoin, you'd need 3 people out of 10k to care enough of their data to be in profit. It's pretty basic math, right?

Someone smarter than me please tell me why it cannot be done on a larger or smaller scale?

Why not just hold them up at gunpoint and tell them invest in a William Devane Bitcoin IRA or else?




469. Post 14462285 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: bargainbin on April 08, 2016, 01:51:06 AM
Anyone else enjoying this unexpectedly awesome rally?
Beetcoin is the best investment ever!

The shekel is taking a beating.  Time to diversify into some Bitcorn or Altcorn?






470. Post 14465438 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Halving analysis completed:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1428863.msg14465271#msg14465271




471. Post 14471329 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: bargainbin on April 08, 2016, 02:13:40 PM
Fun read: http://www.poynter.org/2016/u-s-newspapers-to-ad-blocker-drop-dead/405513/ (Brave = "bitcoin-enabled browser")
“You are hereby notified that Brave’s plan to replace our clients’ paid advertising content with its own advertising violates the law … Your plan to use our content to sell your advertising is indistinguishable from a plan to steal our content to publish on your own website.” -- http://www.naa.org/~/media/NAACorp/Public%20Files/PublicPolicy/LegalAffairs/Brave%20Cease%20and%20Desist%20Final%20copy.pdf

It is a funny read.  They're essentially saying you're not allowed to even view their websites in plain text and they should have corporate control of your browser's capabilities.  That's not how the internet works.



472. Post 14471573 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Wouldn't be surprised if this evolves into some type of strange war where websites try and create some new type of image standard or container where they embed their context (text) and advertisements (pictures) into the same format so they can't be segregated and nothing concerning plaintext view will work either.  You of course lose targeted ads, but those aren't required for the websites to stay in profit.



473. Post 14471962 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: bargainbin on April 08, 2016, 09:13:30 PM
Shut it off on sites that I like.

Like this one?



474. Post 14482131 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

It doesn't matter what % of blocks are full you stupid fucks.  All that matters is what the average transaction fee is.  Since there is no minimum transaction fee, the blocks are basically designed to be full at all times eventually even if you set it to 100MB blocks.  Segwit + hard fork in 2017 = 3.2MB blocks.  Then schnorr multisig on top of that should lower transaction sizes and increase TPS further.




475. Post 14484231 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Aztecminer = Lambchop?



476. Post 14484311 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: aztecminer on April 10, 2016, 12:34:40 AM


sure lambchop wrote those two books in my sig.. sure he did. whatever.

That sounds reasonable to me.



477. Post 14492953 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Eth scam unraveling.  Goldman Sachs and a few unfortunate noobs who I warned this would happen left holding the bag.



478. Post 14517981 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Bernanke coming to pump Bitcoin again:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-11/ben-bernanke-helicopter-money-may-be-best-available-alternative



479. Post 14530861 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 13, 2016, 02:31:44 PM
i'm on the fence. at first i thought it was marvalous, then i found out more about it and realized it isn't magical, sure we'll get a effective block size incress, but only because we are changing how we calculate block size. it feels like i'm being fed BS twisted truths, to make me expect a massive change that will forever complicate bitcoin's code.

Segwit is needed to make SPV clients more secure.  The Satoshi promise of viable SPV is vaporware without it.  Whether you want small or big blocks, you need it either way:

Quote
Fraud proofs: the Completion of Satoshi's Vision for SPV

We're not done yet. Segregated Witness could also introduce something called fraud proofs. Originally envisioned by Satoshi Nakamoto, fraud proofs could significantly improve the security of SPV-nodes (or: “light wallets”); Bitcoin nodes that do not verify all transactions on the network or store the complete blockchain.

To check whether a transaction has taken place, SPV-nodes merely scan the blockchain for the relevant transaction ID. If they find it, that means a miner included the transaction in a block. But SPV-nodes do not validate whether the transaction adhered to Bitcoin’s consensus rules. As such, SPV-nodes trust miners to play fair, rather than verify they do. In a worst case scenario, this could even mean that miners pay SPV-nodes with bitcoin created out of nothing, for instance by creating transactions with no inputs, or by awarding themselves excess fees in the coinbase transaction.

These types of problems could be solved by requiring miners to include extra data in the Segregated Witness Merkle Tree, specifying where the bitcoin locked up in all transactions came from, exactly. That way, if a block contains invalid transactions, a short and easy-to-check fraud proof can be constructed by any full node. This full node can send the fraud proof to SPV-nodes, so they know to reject the block.

That said, even with fraud proofs, SPV-nodes would not quite offer the same level of security as full nodes. Most importantly, the fraud proof solution requires that SPV-nodes can communicate with the network free from censorship. (For instance: censorship from government-sanctioned ISPs.) Additionally, SPV-nodes need at least one full node on the network to actually produce the fraud proofs.



480. Post 14530915 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

And anytime BillyJoeAllen posts about a supposed "block size armageddon", all you need to do is post this as reply:

Quote from: r0ach on April 09, 2016, 07:37:40 PM
It doesn't matter what % of blocks are full you stupid fucks.  All that matters is what the average transaction fee is.  Since there is no minimum transaction fee, the blocks are basically designed to be full at all times eventually even if you set it to 100MB blocks.  Segwit + hard fork in 2017 = 3.2MB blocks.  Then schnorr multisig on top of that should lower transaction sizes and increase TPS further.



481. Post 14532397 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 13, 2016, 11:16:25 PM
And anytime BillyJoeAllen posts about a supposed "block size armageddon", all you need to do is post this as reply:

It doesn't matter what % of blocks are full you stupid fucks.  All that matters is what the average transaction fee is.  Since there is no minimum transaction fee, the blocks are basically designed to be full at all times eventually even if you set it to 100MB blocks.  Segwit + hard fork in 2017 = 3.2MB blocks.  Then schnorr multisig on top of that should lower transaction sizes and increase TPS further.

It's easier to cause a network disruption if the network is already operating at maximum capacity. This is similar to the ease of creating a traffic jam during rush hour as opposed to another time. Fees will rise rapidly and chaotically if a spammer fills blocks. A prolonged attack will very likely cause the price to drop and allow the attacker to more than recover the fees by shorting.  

It's only a matter of time before this happens again.

Your post makes 0 sense because it implies just increase block size forever until it's able to handle all microtransactions on the planet.  Bitcoin can only function as a checkbook type device for large transactions at best, or as a clearing network at worst.  My personal estimates that I've researched to be able to accomplish this checkbook feat (as in cars, boats, houses, expensive but mainstream things that are several thousand in value) is around 8-10MB blocks (and we're talking trillions in market cap here).  3.2MB (what will be implemented in 2017) is starting to get close, so there's no reason to be dramatic and stupid about things.  After block size doubles from that 3.2MB point, most of the glass ceiling on price will be gone.




482. Post 14532791 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: BayAreaCoins on April 14, 2016, 01:54:45 AM
www.Grasscity.com accepts Bitcoin (pipes and such) - http://www.worldwide-marijuana-seeds.com/ accepts Bitcoin (great seed company) - then a number of Tor browser markets accept Bitcoin as well (we all know this one)

Contrary to popular belief, not everyone uses Bitcoin to buy crack on the internet.  There are many reputable, upstanding day traders and financial speculators too.



483. Post 14536587 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 14, 2016, 05:20:58 AM
SegWit is riskier than a 2MB hard fork because it is a more radical change to the protocol.

I'm starting to believe you're an actual banker shill from constantly repeating stuff like this.  Segwit is needed for SPV fraud proofs and malleability regardless of what you think block size should be.  Even the Gavinator, lord of the 20MB block says it's needed, so what are you smoking typing stuff like this?  Did Lambchop buy this account?




484. Post 14536962 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: gentlemand on April 14, 2016, 11:06:23 AM
What are the origins of segwit? Was it long proposed as a nice idea by multiple people or did it arrive out of nowhere from a single source and tickle everyone pink?

Supposedly began as seeking a solution to malleability.



485. Post 14543056 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: sinner on April 14, 2016, 11:32:39 PM
is it possible that the halvening got priced in during the runup from $200ish to $500ish last year? then again i remember a similar runup in price in like august 2012, months before the first halvening.. if thats any indication, price might just do nothing.. for now.

No, it is not possible:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1428863.0



486. Post 14543868 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: ploptra on April 15, 2016, 01:32:33 AM
Listen, Operative 41. The fuse is lighted. ...

I did not receive my payoff from the Jews to initiate said operation.



487. Post 14545763 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Hell has frozen over.  Pro-Bitcoin anti-gold talk on a gold site:

http://www.gold-eagle.com/article/gold-money-or-digital-money



488. Post 14549667 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Tzupy on April 15, 2016, 11:26:13 AM
Just FYI I had a small long and added to it on the PSAR flip. Will take profits around 440$ if this looks weak (and will crash),
or wait with profit taking until 470$, where this should correct anyway. But I would have loved a nice crash to 300$ instead. Cheesy

Classic garbage poster.  Constantly spams that the price is going to crash to $300 (which only a complete idiot would believe) while having a long open and trading the exact opposite of the crap he's spamming.  The entire forum should just put you on ignore after you admitted it.



489. Post 14549863 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Nice, thread was spammed by three freshly created, 0 post count, zionist banking shills in a row.  When they get desperate to start spamming this hard with fake accounts, it means mega price increase coming.



490. Post 14550080 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):




491. Post 14554689 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 15, 2016, 09:44:08 PM
according to blockchain.info, almost all recent blocks are full except for those mined by antpool, which are completely empty. mempool filling back up. 

Quote from: r0ach on April 13, 2016, 09:31:15 PM
And anytime BillyJoeAllen posts about a supposed "block size armageddon", all you need to do is post this as reply:

It doesn't matter what % of blocks are full you stupid fucks.  All that matters is what the average transaction fee is.  Since there is no minimum transaction fee, the blocks are basically designed to be full at all times eventually even if you set it to 100MB blocks.  Segwit + hard fork in 2017 = 3.2MB blocks.  Then schnorr multisig on top of that should lower transaction sizes and increase TPS further.



492. Post 14555976 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 16, 2016, 01:35:01 AM
Engineering to the Bridge

We should have bought more bitcoin...




493. Post 14556756 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Captain's log, stardate 2016 - the Ethereum system has imploded into a black hole.  Supplies acquired, set course to explore the Bitcoin system.




494. Post 14565394 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on April 16, 2016, 01:07:30 PM
SERIOUS ADVISE

https://youtu.be/sWI4Qsqt-sU

listen to the words dear fellows!

Who is that dirty homeless man?  Is that Roger Ver post-heroin?



495. Post 14574964 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 17, 2016, 08:20:32 PM
It's only sustainable if price can raise at a rate slower than average blocksize. I don't see how that's possible because a belief in rising xaction fees has the effect of pushing demand forward or in other words causing people to transact now rather than later which causes the blocks to grow. A self-fulfilling prophecy. 

So either you think a fee market will emerge, in which case you contribute to the capacity problem or you think it won't, in which case you hold off and allow the market to think demand for blockspace is lower than it is,  which creates less incentive to fix the capacity problem. How are you gonna take advantage of a non-jammed network without contributing to the jam? 

The capacity problem will not be fixed if it is not seen as a problem and it won't be seen as a problem if the exchange price is high. Miners will continue to profit selling a shitty inferior product because you assholes keep buying it. I can't blame them. You can't buy as much blockspace as you used to for the same amount of coin. You can't xfer it as fast for the same fee. It can be censored by the PRC.  One Bitcoin is a smaller amount of total market cap than it used to be.  Even if it's undervalued, it's not nearly as undervalued as it was at $350, so why the hell are you buying now? Got a tax refund burning a hole in your pocket?

Quote from: r0ach on April 13, 2016, 09:31:15 PM
And anytime BillyJoeAllen posts about a supposed "block size armageddon", all you need to do is post this as reply:

It doesn't matter what % of blocks are full you stupid fucks.  All that matters is what the average transaction fee is.  Since there is no minimum transaction fee, the blocks are basically designed to be full at all times eventually even if you set it to 100MB blocks.  Segwit + hard fork in 2017 = 3.2MB blocks.  Then schnorr multisig on top of that should lower transaction sizes and increase TPS further.



496. Post 14575965 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

If there is no minimum transaction fee, there are numerous methods of making blocks full at all times no matter how big you make them either using little or no money to do so (such as the miners themselves).  This means the only relevant metric is how much the transaction fees are and not what % of blocks are full.  It's so simple even a caveman can understand it.



497. Post 14588145 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: nanobrain on April 18, 2016, 02:13:47 AM
BlockyJoeAllen come to dump his mind vomit all over these public pages again I see.

Hey genius, you think you got it all figured, where's your code? Where's you tests? Where's your data?

Enough with the mind vomit, time to put up or stfu.

Monday morning quarterbacks and backseat drivers are worse than clueless noobs, there is no reason for their ignorance, it's just willful.

I remember you used to think BJA actually was a genius...but then he started disagreeing with you.

If you want to start floating your theory that the BJA account has been sold/hijacked, the allusion to women being raped suggests this is the original BJA in all his unapologetic glory.

Ever noticed there is little to no negative stigma about men being raped?  It's because it's socially acceptable for women to try and pursue the "alpha male" at all costs, meaning men with power and money, sleeping their way to the top.  A prostitute mentality.  Attempting to trade sex for increase in social and financial status.  This is why men laugh at rape jokes and women subconciously consider rape theft of services, like stealing a lawnmower from a hardware store.  One sex uses sex as a business and the other doesn't.  Most women do in fact have a prostitute mentality, but of course it's politically incorrect to say that.

Women constantly repeat the phrase, "men just don't understand women".  No, that's not the problem at all.  Women are simple, primitive creatures, not very hard to understand at all by anyone who can understand cryptocurrency and game theory.  The problem is, if you do understand them, it's kind of frightening, since you'll then see them as vampires that want absolutely nothing to do with any man that doesn't offer them an entirely asymmetric relationship.  Meaning expectations for benefits of said relationship to be lopsided in their favor, and if that ceases to be the case, license to pursue new prey.



498. Post 14588395 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: TooDumbForBitcoin on April 19, 2016, 01:48:22 AM
BlockyJoeAllen come to dump his mind vomit all over these public pages again I see.

Hey genius, you think you got it all figured, where's your code? Where's you tests? Where's your data?

Enough with the mind vomit, time to put up or stfu.

Monday morning quarterbacks and backseat drivers are worse than clueless noobs, there is no reason for their ignorance, it's just willful.

I remember you used to think BJA actually was a genius...but then he started disagreeing with you.

If you want to start floating your theory that the BJA account has been sold/hijacked, the allusion to women being raped suggests this is the original BJA in all his unapologetic glory.
Ever noticed there is little to no negative stigma about men being raped?  It's because it's socially acceptable for women to try and pursue the "alpha male" at all costs, meaning men with power and money, sleeping their way to the top.  A prostitute mentality.  Attempting to trade sex for increase in social and financial status.  This is why men laugh at rape jokes and women subconciously consider rape theft of services, like stealing a lawnmower from a hardware store.  One sex uses sex as a business and the other doesn't.  Most women do in fact have a prostitute mentality, but of course it's politically incorrect to say that.

Women constantly repeat the phrase, "men just don't understand women".  No, that's not the problem at all.  Women are simple, primitive creatures, not very hard to understand at all by anyone who can understand cryptocurrency and game theory.  The problem is, if you do understand them, it's kind of frightening, since you'll then see them as vampires that want absolutely nothing to do with any man that doesn't offer them an entirely asymmetric relationship.  Meaning expectations for benefits of said relationship to be lopsided in their favor, and if that ceases to be the case, license to pursue new prey.
Is your aloneness a punishment or a choice?

A monogamous relationship as the main goal of one's life is the epitome of being a simpleton, idiocracy type person.  People like Einstein (who was actually a plagiarist, but let's not get into that), couldn't be bothered with meaningless, simpleton things like fashion, so he just bought a bunch of identical clothes and wore them every day.  Meanwhile, everyone else is being constantly bombarded with sex symbols as the main directive of one's life by the media and women themselves trying to get you to waste all your time chasing them.  It's a huge distraction from doing anything with your life.  So, while women can be a source of enjoyment, they have a categorical resemblance to bad habits such as gambling or alcoholism.



499. Post 14600158 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on April 19, 2016, 08:33:10 PM
Forked-tongue lying Stolfi

lol, looks like Stolfi was trolling to get his longs in again.  Fucking Brazillians.  Never trust anyone from Spain, Russia, Brazil, a girl with a scorpion tattoo, or anyone that wants to play cards that's named after a city.



500. Post 14602251 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Let me explain things for the financial illiterate who keep talking about stocks in relation to Bitcoin.  Inflation and negative interests rates are both just social engineering that can be bypassed unless you live in a complete North Korean society.  Lots of random fools like to claim a bull market in stocks is good for Bitcoin, and cratering stocks is bad for it (that TERA dude), but it's more like the exact opposite to anyone with common sense.  NIRP will prove to be ineffective at propping the markets up, because like I said, it's bypassable social engineering and they can't corner you into a choice between stocks and NIRP.  Money will always find somewhere to go looking for safety or returns.




501. Post 14602431 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: nanobrain on April 19, 2016, 12:54:51 PM
but...but...but...the halving....the trains....the rocket...the moooon....MarcusofAugustus' countdown...Huh?

Bitcoin isn't moonships and trains, Bitcoin is a war:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pvxpv_fycl8



502. Post 14613037 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 21, 2016, 03:42:05 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaV1-YC11yk

Are you leveraged or not



503. Post 14613096 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 21, 2016, 04:28:20 AM
Are you leveraged or not
i'm not, never touched leverage...

i just like to be dramatic

Correct me if I'm wrong, but rates are currently around $250 fee per $10,000 BTC borrowed for 3 months (assuming you don't get raped by some variable interest rate during a run)?



504. Post 14613156 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 21, 2016, 04:36:35 AM
leverage is not useful for me
i have money in the bank and bitcoins in my pocket
i never trade with more than like 20% of them at one time
if i wanted to leverage i'd "lend myself" $ or BTC

but lambos?




505. Post 14613499 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Floor is $440 now btw for anyone hoping to buy lower.  These walls on Cornbase won't be pulled and there's no real rush to cash out on Finex.




506. Post 14613575 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 21, 2016, 05:32:46 AM
Six blocks in the last 22 minutes. that will keep the mempool reasonably empty until difficulty gets adjusted.

There must be a shitload of 14nm miners coming on line. I just wish they all weren't in China. The higher Bitcoin goes, the more tempting of a target it is for the PRC unless the same party apparatchiks are using Bitcoin themselves to skirt the capital controls.



You're still moaning about this shit?

If you are actually worried about China you should just sell all your bitcoin and quit whining already.

Sheesh.

You told me to sell all my bitcoin at $375. Fuck you.

Don't sell until you see a triple top above $1200



507. Post 14624374 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

The only post you will ever need to read on the future of paper, Bitcoin, and gold:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1413819.msg14624054#msg14624054



508. Post 14624416 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on April 22, 2016, 02:01:21 AM
guys btc might be coming down a bit over next few days...
https://www.bitfinex.com/posts  
 Announcements
Ether Margin Trading
April 21, 2016
Starting at 3:00pm UTC on Friday April 22nd we will enable margin trading for the the ether pairs ETHBTC and ETHUSD.  Margin funding will also open at that time, allowing users to place ether margin funding offers and bids.
Margin requirements for ether trading will be identical to those of bitcoin and litecoin: 30% initial margin (3.3x leverage) and a 15% maintenance margin requirement. Positions on the ether pairs can be backed with bitcoin, USD, and/or ether.

Nobody wants that useless Eth scamcoin.  I have a 40 page thread documenting why it can't function and why it's a scam.  They're now deleting their own forums and trying to wind down operations for it's collapse:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0



509. Post 14624503 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on April 22, 2016, 02:25:01 AM
guys btc might be coming down a bit over next few days...
https://www.bitfinex.com/posts  
 Announcements
Ether Margin Trading
April 21, 2016
Starting at 3:00pm UTC on Friday April 22nd we will enable margin trading for the the ether pairs ETHBTC and ETHUSD.  Margin funding will also open at that time, allowing users to place ether margin funding offers and bids.
Margin requirements for ether trading will be identical to those of bitcoin and litecoin: 30% initial margin (3.3x leverage) and a 15% maintenance margin requirement. Positions on the ether pairs can be backed with bitcoin, USD, and/or ether.

Nobody wants that useless Eth scamcoin.  I have a 40 page thread documenting why it can't function and why it's a scam.  They're now deleting their own forums and trying to wind down operations for it's collapse:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0
lol wow for a scamcoin u certainly seem very interested with the amount of time u to have put into it.

There will soon be a big -20% on Eth and a big green candle on Bitcoin simultaneously.



510. Post 14624642 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

My commentary on current BTC volume:

Quote from: r0ach on April 22, 2016, 02:47:50 AM
It likely means miners stopped selling, so welcome to 90 days of enormous supply crunch.  The volume will be turned on when we reach a level where some random guy that owns lots of coins believes we have hit a price that is unsustainable pre-halving, which is not going to be below $500 by anyone's standards.  Then the long, drawn out game starts of people trying to sell high, buy lower, or short, with others trying to squeeze or lock out sellers and forcing them to buy back in.  Then we get the volatility that can do just about anything except go below the first double bottom after volume kicks in...another asymmetric trade.



511. Post 14624691 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on April 22, 2016, 02:45:40 AM
lol yea i remember...also remember u saying smart men ( u..me ) will dump on sunday  Cheesy great call m8 , ive bn riding the waves and loving almost everyone, but tommorow i turn my monitor back round as upside down pump could be ending due to another Bitfinex ride about to begin.

I don't know what any of this shit means, but looking at your post history, it appears you are highly invested in Eth.  Extremely fucking stupid to be altcoining DURING the fucking Bitcoin halving rise.  It's about the dumbest trade you can possibly make.  The fact that Eth is conceptually and technically broken, as me and Anonymint have shown, plus being overpumped in a bubble on top of that just makes it all that much worse.  Don't be the idiot that loses all your money betting against the BTC halving.  We already saw that happen to MatTheCat about 24 hours ago.

You will see the -20% Eth flash crash along with a simultaneous BTC green candle soon.



512. Post 14624926 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

When you notice you have Ethereum in a wallet you haven't dumped:




513. Post 14625835 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Most interesting story I've read in a long time.  They're trying to force inflation by manipulating oil and food up to prevent a deflationary collapse in the last throes of the fiat system.  They even had to try and consider pumping gold as an option, but decided that would be against their best interests and did the opposite there (lol):

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-20/one-commodity-trader-writes-what-happening-has-absolutely-no-reasonable-explanation




514. Post 14634839 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: belmonty on April 22, 2016, 07:54:52 PM
I checked the charts for the last halving, it went up a bit then flatlined for a month or two afterwards. A few months later was when it started going up in price, then mooning. If history repeats itself then September sounds good for fireworks.

It will not play out like last time.  The timelines between cause and effect will likely be shorter, and there is more expectation of profits, so it's likely to pump harder beforehand.



515. Post 14645137 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

It's time for the rising music:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGBNXNyTRvQ




516. Post 14645243 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Dotto on April 23, 2016, 11:39:50 PM
Enought nesting bullsheeteens.

We are going up with anemic volume. Just look at 1 day or 3 day timeframes. If volume doesn´t manifest quickly, lets say before seven days, Im calling this a bulltrap.

It's called miners stopped selling, so an 80 day supply crunch of increasing price occurs until the price reaches a level where someone considers it overextended for pre-halving state, which is not gonna be less than $500 by anyone's standards.  It could just gradually rise to $600 on no volume before it occurs.  Once people consider the price overextended, they will then dump with the intention of buying back lower, then the volume, volatility, and long drawn out game of people trying to short, squeeze, and lock others out and force them to rebuy happens.

Knowing that it's going to play out like this, it's going to be funny when the shorters pile in at some price like $600, then a coordinated squeeze hits them and the shorters power the next great Bitcoin bubble.



517. Post 14648006 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

So this aztec guy went all in on metals and is now mad bitcoin is going up...makes sense I guess...



518. Post 14648516 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Cornbase is the leading exchange now at $460.  The fact that it's the leader above the margin exchanges means the organic demand is strong and it's not some type of leveraging overshoot.



519. Post 14654736 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Geriatric people discover slipknot Bitcoin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYCiTx7TwEI



520. Post 14654980 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Nice, the bankers are back to complain about Bitcoin rising.  $500 soon.



521. Post 14655464 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Time to mine...in the middle of the ocean:

http://imgur.com/gallery/NvBrj5J




522. Post 14655784 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Bitsamp, Okcoin, and Coinbase sell side all looking weak.  Nobody wants to sell!



523. Post 14655858 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

When Lambchop (aka blythe masters - secrectly Jorge Stolfi's love child) saw the price going up yet again:




524. Post 14656053 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on April 25, 2016, 05:22:08 AM
This sprouting bull market also seems to be confirmed by LTC/BTC starting to make moves in the upward trajectory as of yesterday. We're on our way to salvation, folks.

The LTC buy was irrational unless the person that did it already owns a lot.  Seeing as how the distribution of LTC isn't that good, that is probably the case.  BTC hasn't even begun it's rise yet, so they could have bought LTC a lot cheaper later on when BTC skyrockets.




525. Post 14664503 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):




526. Post 14665327 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Physical Bitcoins with this is gonna be yuge:  http://opendime.com

I was always worried about some type of financial collapse and the population not being technologically capable of adapating to things like payment channels for scaling.  You could circulate massive amounts of "opendime" slips in a short amount of time for people to do things like grocery shopping.  Then you get the benefits of both gold and digital money at once for most of the general population.



527. Post 14680623 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Why you are an idiot if you don't own as many Bitcoins as you can fit in your pockets:


Quote from: r0ach on April 27, 2016, 08:48:20 AM
Let's break out the list:

1)  Because it's literally a free money asymmetric trade, which is why the price is going up.  The odds of losing are far lower than gaining.

2)  There are only two monetary instruments on earth immune to cascading deflationary collapse of fractional reserve fiat from debts and loans going bad:  Bitcoin and Metals.

3)  If I buy gold, it has less utility than Bitcoin.  Where can I spend gold?  Nowhere.  All I can do with gold is mail it back to the gold dealer for 90% or less of what I paid for it.  Bitcoin utility is currently higher than gold for most people, yet the market cap is zilch.  Expect a correction to occur with Bitcoin market cap increasing because this is a truely distorted market if the tiny market cap asset has more acceptance and utility than the huge market cap one.

4)  Market cap is determined by market makers and market makers plan to raise the price.  People don't build 100 million dollar mining facilities and then let the price be determined by sheer luck or fate.

5)  Bitcoin moves in bubbles and there was an extremely long bear market accumulation period with observable hard floors.  Whenever a long accumulation period occurs on an actual liquid asset, the price explodes afterwards.  If you think Bitcoin is not going to see big moves, you are mistaken.

6)  The inflation rate is going from 8% to 4%, so it's actually a real currency now instead of some hyperinflating bullshit.

7)  Because fucking boats





528. Post 14682211 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: r0ach on April 27, 2016, 12:42:26 PM
Some morons in China trying to run the stops before pumping it atm.  The little Chinaman games get so old.



529. Post 14682332 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Yes, that's called a shake out, unless you believe people actually sell Bitcoins in that manner (on the run up to the halving no less).  The morons in China wanted to try and get rid of as many longs as possible before pumping, but they're all just going to pile back in anyway, so it was completely pointless.



530. Post 14682526 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: whoreble on April 27, 2016, 01:02:47 PM
From the horse's mouth: "Schwab’s money market funds invest exclusively in dollar-denominated, high-quality, short-term instruments, including but not limited to securities issued by the federal government, corporations, municipalities, and banks".

I don't think you will find many buyers for Jewish banker pyramid schemes on here.



531. Post 14691283 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 28, 2016, 07:39:08 AM

5$ up in a few min

interdasting

Easy call

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1453190.0



532. Post 14693124 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Elwar on April 28, 2016, 11:46:00 AM
halving would push the price up over $5,000.






533. Post 14698680 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: whored on April 28, 2016, 11:28:20 PM
-Bitcoin inflation rate is 10% per annum. *Amazing*

Wrong.  Post-halving inflation is 4%.  You will see Bitcoin start to obliterate these hyperinflating South American currencies after halving.

Quote from: whored on April 28, 2016, 11:28:20 PM
-Currently, bitcoin can handle a sustained rate of roughly 3 transaction per second, the average transaction volume generated by one mid-sized US shopping mall. *Amazing*

Another wrong.  Schnorr signatures will lower transaction overhead to increase TPS, plus payment channels from segwit giving you unlimited TPS with garbage collection.  Even without payment channels, it only requires around 8MB blocks for Bitcoin to function as a checkbook type payment system for large value transactions accessible to 1st world middle/upper middle class at full market adoption of trillions in market cap.  Imminent segwit release goes to 1.6MB, then hard fork to raise block size is in 2017, so it will be 3.2MB then.  

Assuming payment channels didn't even exist, you would only need one block size increase from there to remove the glass ceiling on price completely.  I don't know how the whole payment channels and sidechains thing will play out.  It might not be required to raise block size at all and payment channels, sidechains, or both will drive the expansion.  For the consumer that only makes 1 payment to a random entity then never does business again, payment channels are not useful, but for any two entities that do lots of repeat business, payment channels should provide enormous increase in capacity.

Since you only need around 8MB blocks to remove most of the glass ceiling on price, 3.2MB blocks + payment channels combined might, or maybe even probably do it entirely.  Bitcoin will likely be ready for worldwide adoption in 2017.



534. Post 14698929 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

What does someone accidentally sending a $100,00 transaction fee have to do with anything?  It's the same thing as someone accidentally typing an extra zero or two and buying up the entire wall in stocks/commodities.  Failure to understand how to use a keyboard is not a Bitcoin issue.



535. Post 14700113 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: whored on April 29, 2016, 12:20:35 AM
Disgusting insect:
I'm not talking about what's been promised, or what will be. I'm talking about what is, now.
Now make like I just turned on the light and scurry away.




536. Post 14701637 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

The good old days when we had central bankers:




537. Post 14702228 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 29, 2016, 11:01:26 AM
The good old days when we had central bankers:



That's a picture from Somaliland, which is internationally recognized as an autonomus region of the stateless country called Somalia.

So it's more an example of life without a strong state. Not sure if that's what you were aiming for.

These newfangled fascists are kinda hard to read.

Since it doesn't have a "strong state", I guess we can only assume the money printed itself.



538. Post 14702403 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 29, 2016, 11:15:18 AM
The good old days when we had central bankers:



That's a picture from Somaliland, which is internationally recognized as an autonomus region of the stateless country called Somalia.

So it's more an example of life without a strong state. Not sure if that's what you were aiming for.

These newfangled fascists are kinda hard to read.

Since it doesn't have a "strong state", I guess we can only assume the money printed itself.

Well, it's not printed by the Somali government, nor recognized by it. Formally it's on par with Bitcoin in that regard.


So the Somalians don't have a government, but they have currency that printed itself, and the government that doesn't exist doesn't recognize it's currency.



539. Post 14709460 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Bitcoin has declared war on Overclock.net.  Lambchop and his handlers are even monitoring my post history and already arrived to spam the thread... :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1455145.0



540. Post 14709559 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Bears are out of ammo.  BTCE has caught up and OKcoin went from bearish to being about to spill over into a buying avalanche:




541. Post 14718174 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: finkelsteinMonster on May 01, 2016, 03:29:16 AM
No one comes to watch the walls anymore. They used to. Not anymore.

Not during a trading range of $1



542. Post 14725442 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: USB-S on May 01, 2016, 09:31:42 PM
Don't forget guys 9.2% per year is our target. Anything above that is unrealistic.

Yea, no.  This is a high risk, high reward market.  Netflix is much lower risk and look at it's chart.  Bitcoin doesn't move by 10%'s.



543. Post 14737098 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Who is to say the creator of the genesis block longest chain longest thread on Bitcointalk isn't Satoshi...




544. Post 14737180 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Blacula X on May 03, 2016, 03:10:59 AM
So this price manipulation is gonna go on indefinitely? No gazillion-dollar coin in our lifetime? Those bastards! Cry

Since black people in Bitcoin are the equivalent of unicorns, from the choice of username, we can only assume you are Reggie Middleton or Mike Tyson.



545. Post 14740064 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: dloghwak on May 03, 2016, 09:30:50 AM
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/cf-bitcoin-reference-rate.html

beanie babes gonna be traded on CME ... read 'em and weep haters ... moonbeams all around.

Can anyone explain why that is such a big news?
I don't get it. Help appreciated!
Incoming paper Bitcoins
COMEX for example is part of CME

They've kinda gone out of their way to make Bitcoin as legal friendly as possible in London.  Now they've got some more London aristocrats running this.  This tells me if there's any type of manipulation, it's going to be way up as a form of wealth extraction by front running it and then getting all the pensions and everyone else to come in after.  There will be manipulation...by adding a few zeros to the end of the Bitcoin price.



546. Post 14766877 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

The non-aggregate market at work:

Quote from: r0ach on May 06, 2016, 03:06:31 AM
There's around 6-8 million dollars in price suppression walls on multiple exchanges coordinated by one entity right now trying to force triangle convergence lower.  Much of it was Bitfinex staggered ask wall going from around 10k btc to 25k btc in a 24 hour period, while the same thing is going on at Bitstamp and BTCE on a more visible level.

The "not so invisible" hand of the market:







547. Post 14769018 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: petahashminer on May 06, 2016, 09:37:04 AM
hashrate has increased significantly in the last few days, can we assume this the sound of  the incoming pump ?

The theme song for the Ethereum collapse when BTC goes up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_48JNlRIERw



548. Post 14770621 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 06, 2016, 01:14:02 PM

its going to 520 with 2 legs up in <48hours.

i can FEEL IT!

shits about to get real.

I told you not to tell anyone



549. Post 14771605 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: MingLee on May 06, 2016, 03:31:20 PM
Maybe we can get more people coming out of the woodwork and start claiming they're Satoshi, I wouldn't mind seeing this trend continue  Cheesy

Done.

Quote from: r0ach on May 03, 2016, 02:59:46 AM
Who is to say the creator of the genesis block longest chain longest thread on Bitcointalk isn't Satoshi...





550. Post 14775193 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on May 07, 2016, 12:16:32 AM
because expectations are simply too high...

No

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEJ8lpCQbyw



551. Post 14775320 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: whoreble on May 07, 2016, 12:27:07 AM
Edit: The final piece of Satoshi puzzle click into place https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4i43gr/craig_wrights_sister_told_bitcoinbelle_that_he/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw



552. Post 14776287 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: White sugar on May 07, 2016, 03:03:04 AM
Just noticed you can buy games in Steam using Bitcoin.








553. Post 14784323 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Ultrafinery on May 07, 2016, 09:43:22 PM
berry berry bad.

Looks like this thread needs another exorcism for Jewish banker shills.  The tentacle squid is trying to do god's work again.




554. Post 14784409 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Ultrafinery on May 08, 2016, 12:42:28 AM
^^Buttberry Angry




555. Post 14784511 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Ultrafinery on May 08, 2016, 01:07:14 AM
^^

Dingleberry!.




556. Post 14784608 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

I wonder if the low level, Jewish banker foot soldiers in this thread know what happens soon.  Central banks of every country load up the balance sheet to absurd proportions.  Once you reach levels like this, the country is basically fascist or communist by definition when the state owns all business and means of production.  There's no way back once you reach a point like this.  What happens next is, the civilization is imploded just like the USSR was and all assets of the state are sold off to the oligarchs for pennies.

The people benefiting from the carpet baggetry aren't the low level Jews like the ones constantly spamming this thread, you're basically just useful idiots in that regard.  People like Blythe Masters probably don't even benefit.  Just the overlord, kingpin Jews like Soros run off with ownership of everything (until a nationalist somewhere like in Japan, China, or the US notices what they're doing and starts WW3 and kills them all).

Assuming everyone doesn't die in a nuclear holocaust, Bitcoin and metals should be the only things usable as currencies to survive this, so you low level, Zionist banker shill foot soldiers might be able to act as carpet baggers on a micro level and scoop up some McMansions or a golf course by owning a few BTC, the very asset you're paid to shill against.




557. Post 14784791 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: bitcoin carpenter on May 08, 2016, 02:30:47 AM
In my opinion i think we will hover under 500 usd dollars until early september

lol no.  The odds of it being below $500 on the day the halving occurs are 0.  Even bears like MatTheCat that hate BTC and want it to die talk about not being surprised if it pumped to something like $600 soon before the halving even occurs. 



558. Post 14784971 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

JayJuanGee, I'm going to need you to stop eating MSG filled hotpockets in the basement.  If you don't know that the price will be over $500 on the day of the halving, then you don't understand these markets.



559. Post 14785843 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on May 08, 2016, 02:59:06 AM
1. I'm confussed now, is BTC a commiditoy or an assest ? And how do the centeral banks view it ?

I view Bitcoin 100% as a currency and not commodity.  Europe recognizes it as such.  The US govt claims it's a commodity.  Whatever they classify it as might be entirely motivated by existing taxation structure, so it's kind of irrelevant what random bureaucrats say.  If you try to look at it from an angle claiming that Bitcoin can't handle micro-transactions so that makes it a commodity, this is false.  All that means is it's a network for wealthy people to place large value transactions and people living in poverty will be priced out.

Having said that, I estimate you only need around 8MB blocks for Bitcoin to be utilized and spread by the middle/upper middle class of 1st world nations as a checkbook type device for large value transactions.  3.2MB blocks + payment channels might give you the equivalent or much higher than 8MB blocks, and that happens in the very near future.

We don't need every poor person in the world to use Bitcoin for it to have value.  People who have lots of money are the prime benefactors of Bitcoin because they have the most to lose when the bankers have a bank holiday and freeze their accounts for withdrawal.  People with extremely small amounts of money (very poor 3rd world nations) can still use centralized BTC debit card services if they can't afford on-chain transactions.

Quote from: Fakhoury on May 08, 2016, 02:59:06 AM
2. Do you want to say that the new normal for the central banks will be is buying BTC ? If yes, kindly elaborte more about it.

I think once the next Bitcoin bubble occurs, banks and ETFs will be forced into the market, and they'll pump Bitcoin way higher on top of the large gains it already makes.  The Winklevoss are some of the most cunning whales in this game having an ETF planned before the thing even got off the ground.  People like Max Keiser and Rpietila just bought early and that's about it.  Winklevoss bought and built the framework on top of that for it to explode to obscene levels.



560. Post 14786093 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

I read someone claim the last controversial ETF took seven years.  It might be a couple years from now, or it could even occur in 2017.  I could see them fast tracking it if the post-halving charts don't look like a completely ridiculous pump and dump going from like $500 to $10,000 and back to $1000 again.  People would think that's kind of suspicious.  If it went from $500 to $3200 then back to $1600, they would consider that OK and just price discovery/growing market.



561. Post 14795820 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on May 09, 2016, 12:58:41 AM

Doesn't that usually involve a human female?

I've heard of them.




562. Post 14807217 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Nice, all the douchebags from "whaleclub" are in this thread spamming praying that the price goes lower, otherwise they'll have to pay more to buy back in than the amount of money they used to temporarily rig a drop.  The last orchestrated drop didn't work so well, and they might have even lost money buying back in, so I'm surprised anyone even attempted to manipulate it again.



563. Post 14807587 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Not sure why anyone gives this Tera guy any credibility.  The market was rock solid at the $420 range before it started going up.  Anyone that says it could go below that 60 days before the halving is either flat out lying or just an idiot.  He doesn't seem to be below 80 IQ stupid, so it appears he's just lying like every typical day trading scumbag on the forum, desperate to get a good margin long position because he forgot the halving was coming and just decided to look at the BTC charts today.



564. Post 14808372 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Ultrafinery on May 10, 2016, 02:13:03 PM
You know, they used similar arguments at the Nuremberg Trials. "The Wehrmacht is so big, I was just a tiny part of it. If I didn't gas and BBQ joos and homos, someone else would have taken my place. I didn't even vote for Hitler! He just paid my salary, and I did his bidding, all the time hoping that he'd go broke." Cheesy

Shitty example.  The only way to win any war is genocide.  That's why Caesar holocosted the Gauls.  What good does getting rid of 1% or less of a population do?  Then you just have to fight them again over and over every year.  Unless one side is either completely eradicated or takes big enough losses where they would never think about even attempting to fight again, there is no reason to go to war in the first place.



565. Post 14808886 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 10, 2016, 03:15:54 PM
how do you buy gas and food??

you live with perpaid gift cards and such?

that must be a hell of a hassle...

I don't think it's hard at all.  The real challenge would be trying to live off gold.  Remember the Mark Dice video where he tried to sell a $1000 ounce of gold for $50 and nobody would take it? lol.  Imagine going into a Wal-Mart and being like, yo Tawanda, I need to buy some socks.  Is it ok if I pay with gold bullion? (Tawanda referring to Lambchop of course)



566. Post 14818352 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Amir Taco belongs in a high school garage band somewhere instead of Bitcoin:

https://forum.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-discussion/amir-taaki-and-the-segway-in-austria-t7749.html



567. Post 14825383 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: DaRude on May 12, 2016, 06:38:51 AM
Huh around BTC4k sell order on Finex and market barely moved maybe something is afoot

Screenshots of that failed market manipulation play on Bitfinex in this thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1469361.0

Good job losing money by trying to manipulate BTC down suckers.



568. Post 14826030 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on May 12, 2016, 07:14:02 AM
Growth with bitpay payments = growth in BTC->USD conversion.


Growth in Jewish banking = growth in nationalism in the US, France, and other parts of Europe to get rid of them until they get put in front of firing squads for financial terrorism:

Quote
The next French presidential election has first round voting in just 11 months time. The polls consistently indicate that Marine Le Pen, the leader of the nationalist Front National party, has 30% support. That puts her in either first or second place, depending who runs against her.

This a big deal. The Front National has a history of overt racism and anti-semitism – under Jean Marie Le Pen, Marine’s father – even if it claims that those days are behind it.

Le Pen wants to take France out of the euro and throw up trade barriers to protect French industry. If that happened then, effectively, the EU project would be dead in the water.




569. Post 14827581 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on May 12, 2016, 10:55:31 AM
Growth in Jewish banking = growth in nationalism in the US, France, and other parts of Europe to get rid of them until they get put in front of firing squads for financial terrorism:

You forgot western imperialism, illuminati and the reptilian aliens... their lifeforce is also drained from your bitcoins getting cheaper. Tough luck.

Yes, the standard Zionist tactic.  When people mention the #1 financial terrorists on earth like Soros and Bernanke are all Jewish, bring up some nonsense about "reptiles".  Sorry, that doesn't work.  Nationalism is on the rise in the US and all of Europe.  They will all be in front of firing squads soon.  You can't propagandize your way out of it with the media.  The perpetrators of global financial terrorism will eventually pay for their crimes like any other petty thief.



570. Post 14827673 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Ultrafinery on May 12, 2016, 12:41:48 PM





571. Post 14828231 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: podyx on May 12, 2016, 01:12:06 PM
Why is ETH moving up so damn much?

Probably because they have to raise it in order to drop the hammer and exit.  What kind of complete idiot would be holding Eth this close to BTC halving?




572. Post 14834151 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

The Jewish fiat shills are back again (3 of them spamming at the same time) using their textbook playbook of try to create infighting among Bitcoin users.  Hmm I wonder why:

Quote from: r0ach on May 12, 2016, 06:12:33 PM
Let's examine a nice passage from Paul "Jewbastard" Krugman's paper titled "Bitcoin is Evil":

Quote
BitCoin looks like it was designed as a weapon intended to damage central banking and money issuing banks, with a Libertarian political agenda in mind

God forbid someone should prevent bankers from scamming!



573. Post 14834582 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on May 13, 2016, 05:31:21 AM
ETH is also on the rise again *conspiracy intensifies*

Yes, Eth is being elevated for the classic noob destroying move known as "the hammer":






574. Post 14835972 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 13, 2016, 08:37:45 AM
Operation Icarus

99.9% chance it will be the government performing a black swan event on itself since they know it's coming down anyway and then blaming "renegade hackers".  Either way, bullish for Bitcoin so I don't give a fuck.  Proceed to black swan yourself jew bankers!



575. Post 14839089 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Oh, is Lambchop back shilling for the bankers again?  Ovey, invest in mortgage backed securities!





576. Post 14840275 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Ultrafinery on May 13, 2016, 05:21:51 PM
Unpleasant insectoid goy:

I see you are rubbing your little rat claws together, dreaming of the clanging of shekels from halving profits.



577. Post 14845886 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: gentlemand on May 13, 2016, 09:38:09 PM
I'll bet that almost nobody knows what a DAO is. I sure as shit don't. But it's a number that probably goes UP.

All you need to know about why buying the DAO will likely cause you to lose large amounts of money:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1471177.0



578. Post 14849740 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):




579. Post 14854227 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Just got off the phone with China, the wedge that's currently converging at 456 will break upwards upon completion.








580. Post 14857258 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: BitconAssociation on May 15, 2016, 03:05:55 PM
How's it goin'?






581. Post 14865150 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: no-ice-please on May 16, 2016, 05:13:09 AM
Why does the poll not offer any options over $1,000...I think it will be >$4,000

We were aiming for $3200, but if Adam agrees on $4000, I will allow it.



582. Post 14866589 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Ultrafinery on May 16, 2016, 01:29:55 PM
The thrill is gone, baby





583. Post 14867241 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

$3200 incoming

http://techcrunch.com/2016/05/16/blockchain-open-sources-thunder-network-paving-the-way-for-instant-bitcoin-transactions/




584. Post 14871521 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Looks like the Eth scammers at work again:

Quote from: r0ach on May 17, 2016, 03:08:19 AM
Here comes another move from the Eth scammers.  200,000 Eth was stolen from Gatecoin exchange, and then the Eth price is pumped 10% the next day? LOL.  That makes no damn sense.  When someone steals a huge amount of an altcoin, the price always goes down.  Darkcoin had a bunch of coins stolen from C-Cex and the price went down literally 50% after.  The fact that Eth was pumped right after this theft makes it look like whales are trying to raise the price in order to find someone to dump on and exit before the thieves sell.



585. Post 14872031 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 17, 2016, 04:11:14 AM
^^ you are assuming that adamstgBit is not lampchop ... or facilitating lambchop by selectively neglecting moderation, maybe someone paid adamstgBit to allow miscreant shitlords to run amok here whenever they felt like it? He does seem to wallow in the swine muck they regularly serve up, like he's benefiting from it or somehow or another.

I just remembered this thread is moderated and Adam doesn't bother to delete the paid shill posters like Lambchop.  That is kinda fishy.



586. Post 14872635 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on May 17, 2016, 06:11:15 AM
you all so nervous. bad sign

Or just maybe the point that Adam doesn't seem to care about deleting banker shill posters is kind of strange when he made the thread moderated for some reason...

The only explanation is that he either prefers them over JayJuanGee, or he's in on the take.



587. Post 14872724 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on May 17, 2016, 06:27:35 AM
you all so nervous. bad sign

Or just maybe the point that Adam doesn't seem to care about deleting banker shill posters is kind of strange when he made the thread moderated for some reason...

The only explanation is that he either prefers them over JayJuanGee, or he's in on the take.

Everyone here are on the take. You are the only fool here who is shilling for free.

No, it's entirely possible he prefers them over JayJuanGee



588. Post 14873970 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: becoin on May 17, 2016, 09:00:20 AM
There will be an avalanche-like adoption of bitcoin at any moment. I can smell it. And I'm never wrong at what I smell.

We don't care about that anymore.  We're waiting on Adam to come out of the closet as Lambchop.  The French are not known to be very manly.  The pieces of the puzzle are starting to come together.



589. Post 14875568 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

So sorry shills, a 10% eth rise that is just gonna be instantly dumped on idiots below where it started is nothing compared to this:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1475538.0



590. Post 14876333 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Feel free to buy that Eth scamcoin and have the rug instantly pulled out from under you.  They're pumping it in order to find momentum traders to dump on to get BTC for the BTC halving.  Only idiots hold altcoins during BTC halving.



591. Post 14877371 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on May 17, 2016, 02:18:54 PM
The race-baiting insects are running the show now. I knew I should have stayed away. Undecided




592. Post 14883912 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: celebreze32 on May 17, 2016, 07:05:15 PM
This DAO could make a similar ETH crash.

The DAO is going to cause a biblical crash in Eth and all that money will be going right back to BTC for the halving:


Quote from: r0ach on May 18, 2016, 06:38:21 AM
The next big move in crypto markets is when these DAO people can sell.  I don't recall the exact date, but I think it was May 27 or 28.  BTC comes to the end of a wedge near that date, and $130 million that was tied up in the form of Eth to invest in the DAO is now considered a horrible investment by just about everyone.  They will likely dump the hell out of those, imploding the Eth market in the process, and put the mony into BTC for halving gains.

Why the DAO is either a horrible investment at best, and scam at worst:

http://steemit.com/crypto-news/@dan/is-the-dao-going-to-be-doa

More on that subject below:

After reading that through, it looks like the entire system was designed as a way to give the appearance of a risk free chance at profit, with the goal of the issuers just being to pump Eth in the short term (likely so the Eth devs can just dump and cash out like Vitalik was doing).  Even if one of these ventures did become profitable, the payoff would be delayed until like 2020.  If you just held BTC until 2020, you could have a god knows how big of fortune instead of some measily "slock.it" smart meter or whatever the hell gains.

It's clear this whole thing was just a pump scheme with the goal of inflating Eth market cap.  Attempt to lock up $100 million in the short term with the possibility of locking people in longer if they do something stupid like vote to make their funds unspendable.  What was the date DAO people can start selling again?  May 28th or something?  I have a feeling Eth shorts are going to do well that day.





593. Post 14885035 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Ethereum is useless and broken from a technical and fundamental standpoint.  Everyone that knows anything about cryptocurrency knows this (don't take my word for it, read everyone's view):

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0

Even if you're playing the "greater fool" pump game with Eth, it's going to have the biggest implosion the world has ever seen on May 28th when the DAO holders start to dump ($130 million that will likely be reinvested in BTC) while the BTC triangle converges upwards.  So the question is, since the single entity manipulator of Eth knows everybody else knows this, when does he pull the rug out from under you?  Will he wait a few days, or could it just come at any second?



594. Post 14885121 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on May 18, 2016, 09:07:42 AM
Even if you're playing the "greater fool" pump game with Eth, it's going to have the biggest implosion the world has ever seen on May 28th when the DAO holders start to dump ($130 million that will likely be reinvested in BTC)

 Grin

Yes, it is a nice quote isn't it.



595. Post 14885254 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Cassius on May 18, 2016, 09:23:12 AM
Even if you're playing the "greater fool" pump game with Eth, it's going to have the biggest implosion the world has ever seen on May 28th when the DAO holders start to dump ($130 million that will likely be reinvested in BTC)

 Grin

Yes, it is a nice quote isn't it.

Yes, you sure have a way with words to make a grown man smile  Wink

I don't see it going that far. Might even be happening now (I never can make sense of ETH). At some point very soon, a big holder is going to drop the hammer and giggle into his coffee he's beat everyone else to the dump, including DAO itself.

The single entity manipulating Ethereum upwards that padded the order books to make the buy side go from 7000 to 12,000 btc in one second is not going to wait until May 28th to dump.  That part is pretty obvious.  The Eth manipulator is going to be dumping long before giving DAO holders a chance to dump on him.



596. Post 14885377 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on May 18, 2016, 09:36:20 AM
It's momentum(ethereum) is mostly strong and fades gradually, and that gives it predictability. BTC momentum is weak, short lasting and unpredictable.

HAHAHAA

Wait till May 28th comes.  You have $130 million dollars denominated in Eth that was locked up in the DAO, which everyone now considers a horrible investment.  That DAO money is going to cause the biggest dump Eth has ever seen.  Even pro-Eth people are saying that on forums.



597. Post 14885432 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Even Goldman Sachs is like "Wow, this Ethereum shit is not a sound financial investment" hahahaha




598. Post 14886635 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

After this Ethereum pumper fails, the DAO implodes, and the SEC investigation begins:




599. Post 14889851 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Tzupy on May 18, 2016, 02:59:40 PM
Some early adopter has a different opinion... Grin



You can use BTC as collateral to short Eth.



600. Post 14890173 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

BTCE hit $457 and OKcoin is $455 so the 3rd world exchanges are no longer behind the west for the first time in like a month.  Price is definitely going up.



601. Post 14900034 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

A Bitcoin chart with to scale measurements for you dirtbags:

Quote from: r0ach on May 19, 2016, 03:31:53 PM
Lord of bad charts Mat seems to of missed this one:

https://twitter.com/bbands/status/733009813815222273





602. Post 14900310 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on May 19, 2016, 04:04:53 PM
get ready  Tongue

Gemini adding Eth did absolutely nothing for price.  It's a fundamentally broken coin still in a bubble.  The only reason Eth is being pumped is so the single entity Eth manipulator can attempt to exit before May 28th when the $130 million DAO denominated in Eth dumps and craters the market.  That plus Bitcoin going up for halving is going to send eth to the toilet.



603. Post 14900917 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Non-stop spam of 1 star shill accounts spamming about Eth.  Must mean the Ethereum price is maxed out and collapse imminent.



604. Post 14903993 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Have fun getting dumped on by the Ethereum pumper, Eth shills:

Quote from: r0ach on May 19, 2016, 10:42:58 PM
I'd be much more worried about how much the Eth price is going to implode.  It's a single entity pumping it into an even bigger bubble than it already was, who is also going to exit before the Eth DAO can dump on May 28th.  So first the Eth pumper dumps, then the Eth DAO people dump, then the Bitcoin halving happens to dump Eth more.  What do you suppose the Eth price is going to be after 3 mega dumps?



605. Post 14913295 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):




606. Post 14917503 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Anyone notice someone removes 2000 BTC buy support on Finex when they want to buy and adds 2000 btc support when they want it to go up?  Each time it's removed has always been a good buy (currently it's removed).  Huobi still $447 and BTCE $443 while they try to manipulate on Finex.

The $150 million DAO denominated in Ethereum is going to dump hard when it can be sold on May 28th, so the single entity Ethereum pumper is going to drop the hammer and dump the fuck out of Eth before that date comes and they can dump on him.  Then the BTC halving causes Ethereum to dump again as BTC rises and everyone leaves Eth to momentum trade BTC.  That will be three huge Ethereum dumps in a row.  It's going to be brutal.



607. Post 14917704 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: pariahbit on May 21, 2016, 09:00:01 AM
Edit: I mean Haha! More cheap coins for me!

Yea, buy those cheap Ethereums right before they drop the hammer on you and then your magical shill accounts mysteriously disappear with nothing left to say.



608. Post 14918024 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: pariahbit on May 21, 2016, 09:31:43 AM
happy deim

It's probably over for Eth rise.  I wouldn't short it either since it's not an aggregate market and the single entity manipulating it would just try to squeeze you.  The only logical move is to exit that market completely.




609. Post 14919871 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: finkelsteinMonster on May 21, 2016, 01:12:10 PM
Top four stories about ETH

They forgot this one:




610. Post 14921285 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: pariahbit on May 21, 2016, 04:02:45 PM
Sure I have. So did everyone who stayed in school past 6th grade. Modern economy is based on it.

Nice, he shills against Bitcoin and for Ethereum + fractional reserve fiat banking.  Scumbag Zionist Jew banker shill detected.



611. Post 14923809 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

lol, how is it not going to look the same when you copy and pasted the same picture over it?



612. Post 14930136 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Who will be the next to get dumped on by Vitalik in the Ethereum greater fool pump?  

It's like watching the movie Platoon.  You see bodies going down and people screaming and someone says, "Where is Johnny???", oh shit, he got dumped on by Vitalik.








613. Post 14931301 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Some dbag Ethereum pumper took out a 1000 BTC short to try and make BTC look weak while attempting to pump ETH at the same time.  The Ethereum scamcoin pumper is eventually going to have to give up when he realizes he's not getting BTC any lower:



Ethereum scammers had been dumping actual BTCs on Finex before this.  It seems they have now run out and can only short now.



614. Post 14938714 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):



A young Ethereum shill horrified by the news reacts:






615. Post 14940694 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Eth collapsing even more now.  Eat it shills.



616. Post 14942991 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 23, 2016, 05:39:53 PM
ETH prices will fall lower and lower and lower and there will be no bottom!



617. Post 14943133 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 23, 2016, 05:43:20 PM
I believe BTC price is about to snap back to 460.

You will see an instant + $12 to BTC soon.  Eth shills will cry as their IPO scamtoken collapses.



618. Post 14943884 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Eth collapsing again!

How can you blame it?  It knows what Bitcoin is about to do:




619. Post 14944415 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

It appears Eth experiencing a downtrend pump.



620. Post 14944851 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

You know the Eth dumps in the night
Eth dumps in the day
Try to run
Try to hide
Dump on through to the other side



621. Post 14963792 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):




Which then leads into vomit inducing pump










Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 17, 2015, 03:14:42 AM
May you all go broke, and burn in hell...






622. Post 14965583 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: SomaliRebel on May 25, 2016, 02:01:04 PM
If Bitcoin is about maximizing the use of Drano decentralization

The purpose of Bitcoin is to escape the system of neo-feudalism through usury that exists via fractional reserve fiat currencies.

Don't want to be a slave?  Don't use money designed for slaves.

Debt based, fiat usury, federal reserve notes also cease to function and implode without an infinite growth model.




623. Post 14966038 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Latest news on the Ethereum pump and dump scamcoin:



No other exchanges followed the BTC manipulation movements because everyone already knows what these Eth scammers are doing.



624. Post 14966945 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: altsheets on May 25, 2016, 04:19:06 PM


I expect the sell side to list something like 75 million coins for sale eventually.  It's kind of a useless metric unless all the exchanges listed actually do proof of solvency.



625. Post 14967167 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Assmaster2000 on May 25, 2016, 04:46:43 PM
Spain arrests 30 suspected of laundering money in bitcoin centers

Many wow, they seize an amount of Bitcoin equal to robbing a gas station:

"They did not say how much money had been laundered through the bitcoin mining operation but added they had for now seized 31,320 euros ($34,903) worth of the currency as well as cash, motorbikes and luxury cars and a small aircraft."

Fiat currencies such as the USD and Yuan will now crash from them auctioning off "a small aircraft".



626. Post 14968045 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Monero dev makes shockingly obvious discovery Ethereum is a centralized scamcoin

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1485051.0



627. Post 14968268 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 25, 2016, 06:41:38 PM
the big wow factor will be when >75% hashing power + economic majority HardFork bitcoin to 2MB blocks.

It's already going to 2MB blocks + segwit with 2017 hard fork anyway, which should be an effective 3.x MB block size.  That's why there's not much of a reason to make a big deal out of it unless someone tries to renig.  Also, weak blocks make raising block size not an actual problem and weak blocks is already planned here:

http://coinjournal.net/blockstream-president-adam-back-shares-roadmap-scaling-bitcoin/

There's not even any argument that Bitcoin will or won't be scaled, it's just that people believe core is doing it too slowly, but that's just how it is when you actually have to develop and test things first for something where if you make a mistake would implode billions of dollars.




628. Post 14969864 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Assmaster2000 on May 25, 2016, 09:23:45 PM
Serious question: Our Bitcoin committee is trying to decide which of Bitcoin's twin greatest minds -- r0ach or JJG -- to nominate for the coveted Nobel Brain Prize in Smartitude.

Frankly, we're torn. Our complicated and pricey laboratory apparata has failed to conclusively differentiate, via rigorous application of scientific methods and procedures, the greater of the two minds, due to them both being so ginormously huge.
Our team is tempted to nominate them both, but we worry: Would forcing two sovereign individuals [who are not gay] to share this, the highest of accolades, dilute and/or cheapen the experience for them?

Thoughts?




629. Post 14970382 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

A song for the shill Lambchop to mourn over the rise of Bitcoin and the death of Eth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrMLMV6E4CM



630. Post 14977082 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: clopoterian on May 26, 2016, 12:24:51 PM
Jewish Bankers issue debt based currency to establish a system of neo-feudalism through usury.  Citizens pay off ransom to the Jewish bankers and they come back asking for more or there will be tanks in the streets

"Negotiating with criminals doesn’t always work out, as Kansas Heart Hospital in Wichita learned last week.

That’s right: the criminals got their ransom, and then decided they wanted more money. The hospital’s president, Dr. Greg Duick says the hospital is not paying up."



631. Post 14977198 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: finkelsteinMonster on May 26, 2016, 02:18:49 PM
GTF out of my house, disgusting parasite.

No Jew tears, Lambchop and Co.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrMLMV6E4CM



632. Post 14977364 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Do people think Bitstamp is solvent or selling fractional reserve coins?

Quote from: r0ach on May 26, 2016, 02:35:08 PM
Bitstamp screwed up a while back and lost $5 million in a social engineering attack.  I don't know if they've done any type of proof of solvency post-attack, but their exchange behavior lately has been very strange.  Someone has been really desperate to try and keep prices low there.  For example, right now prices are $454 on Finex, BTCE, and Coinbase, yet in the following picture, you can see someone has a wall up at $452 trying to prevent it from going higher while also dumping coins into the buy side.  They are essentially just setting money on fire doing this in an attempt to stop Bitcoin from rising.  

It's possible it's just some rich entity that really doesn't want the price of BTC to go up because they want to accumulate as many coins as possible before halving, but the other possibility is the exchange itself trying to keep prices lower to buy back coins they don't actually have.  This is not an actual Gox situation or anything since the coins that were stolen from Bitstamp have been sold off long ago, so it's only an issue if they turn out to be selling you non-existent coins for fiat and you try to withdraw from there.

Here's the link from the July 1st, 2015 robbery:

http://www.coindesk.com/unconfirmed-report-5-million-bitstamp-bitcoin-exchange/

It's always possible it's just a manipulator unaffiliated with the exchange, or the people pumping Ethereum trying to stop Bitcoin from rising to prevent their pump and dump altcoin from imploding.





633. Post 14977915 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: clopoterian on May 26, 2016, 03:19:12 PM
Hurray!
EU Parliament Approves Proposal for Digital Currency Task Force
http://www.coindesk.com/eu-parliament-digital-currency-task-force/
Party vans en route. Bullish!

Are they going to stop the jews from issuing debt based digital fiat to establish a system of neo-feudalism through usury?



634. Post 14978834 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

GoldsteinSachs admits defeat:  https://news.bitcoin.com/goldman-sachs-bitcoin-ideal-public/



635. Post 14980270 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: clopoterian on May 26, 2016, 04:51:16 PM
Come, bull friends, the way is clear, let's frolic!




636. Post 14980901 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: 600watt on May 26, 2016, 07:58:28 PM

you managed to write no racist or anti-jewish bullshit in this post. wow.

(imho, if you would leave this bullshit out of your posts more people would consider your writing containing some interesting or entertaining thoughts. you know that it is utter nonsense to claim that someone is evil (bad/stupid/smart/whatever) solely on the grounds of what kind of religion that persons parents choose to select for their kid)

it is fucking annoying, stop that shit.




637. Post 14981351 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):




638. Post 14981456 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: beastmodeBiscuitGravy on May 26, 2016, 08:47:36 PM
Ideally, Core should change the PoW and have their own fork

You're a paid jew banker shill account so of course you want there to be a fork to two chains, that's the fastest way for the price to go down.  Accounts registered in March 2016 pretending not to be banker shills and talking about hostile hard forks LOL.  These idiot Goldsteins, Goldmans, and Goldbergs are high on their own Kool Aid and actually believe their propaganda works.




639. Post 14981538 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: beastmodeBiscuitGravy on May 26, 2016, 09:10:00 PM
Ideally, Core should change the PoW and have their own fork

You're a paid jew banker shill account so of course you want there to be a fork to two chains, that's the fastest way for the price to go down.  Accounts registered in 2016 pretending not to be shills and talking about hostile hard forks LOL.
Hey it wasn't just me, scurrying gentile friend...  a bunch of the mini blockists are salivating about mining at home again.

Nice, so you just proved you have the ability to have 2 different web browsers open and spam Jew banker propaganda in both windows at the same time.  What a feat!  You get a $2 bonus from the JIDF this month!



640. Post 14981570 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: korila on May 26, 2016, 09:16:26 PM
This is my main concern as well..
It seems that Segwit will not be activated ....forver...

Lol, nice try Ethereum scammer.  Your biggest fear is Eth dumps before you can sell, which is why you've been trying to hype Eth in every thread.



641. Post 14981641 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: beastmodeBiscuitGravy on May 26, 2016, 09:19:02 PM
Ideally, Core should change the PoW and have their own fork

You're a paid jew banker shill account so of course you want there to be a fork to two chains, that's the fastest way for the price to go down.  Accounts registered in 2016 pretending not to be shills and talking about hostile hard forks LOL.
Hey it wasn't just me, scurrying gentile friend...  a bunch of the mini blockists are salivating about mining at home again.

Nice, so you just proved you have the ability to have 2 different web browsers open and spam Jew banker propaganda in both windows at the same time.  What a feat!  You get a $2 bonus from the JIDF this month!

Read their post history, my paranoid friend. A little more difficult than just letting out your Tourettes "Jew Banker Shill!" tick... but it may prove illuminating for you.

Nobody posts on this board for their health.  You and your large nose friends making hundreds of shill accounts per day spamming "omg bitcoin is gonna die today I promise!" are obviously being paid to do so.  Only a complete moron would work against his own self interest by being a propagandist for the Jew bankers, so it's not hard to figure out you're also part of the tribe.




642. Post 14981712 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on May 26, 2016, 09:33:44 PM
Enjoy the upcoming holiday the Americans are having. Be sure to have some fiat at your local exchange, just in case the price moves quickly downward.


3 day weekend seems to bring out some sort of price[tinfoil hat] manipulation [/tinfoil hat]

Sounds like someone forgot to buy at $440



643. Post 14983404 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

It's happening:

Quote from: r0ach on May 25, 2016, 11:15:55 AM



Which then leads into vomit inducing pump










May you all go broke, and burn in hell...







644. Post 14983509 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: r0ach on May 27, 2016, 02:35:05 AM
lol bitfinex is basically out of coins to sell, maybe just slap another 0 on the end of the price and call it a day.



645. Post 14991989 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: finkelsteinMonster on May 27, 2016, 11:14:15 AM
Bitcoin (BTC) $474.37 5.01%





646. Post 14999289 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

R.I.P. Ethereum Shills:

Goldman Sachs & Ethereum shill Fred Ehrsam claims Bitcoin dead and then...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1488490.0

Vitali butter carefully distances from the Dao dump..

https://www.reddit.com/r/Buttcoin/comments/4lduhu/vitali_butter_carefully_distances_from_the_dao/

Ethbutters scramble as The D'oh is about to turn into a $150M Sorry For Your Loss event

https://www.reddit.com/r/Buttcoin/comments/4ld29g/butters_scramble_as_the_doh_is_about_to_turn_into/



647. Post 14999702 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: goldsun on May 28, 2016, 02:21:55 PM
As bitcoin continue to rise, so will etherum.

Or not.




648. Post 15002633 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: clopoterian on May 28, 2016, 07:07:50 PM
^Goldstein. Is that an African American name?




649. Post 15003227 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Vahnt on May 28, 2016, 08:45:27 PM
Someone is trying very hard to suppress price w/ giant 650 coin wall @ 497 on Stamp

Does it get eaten? Pulled?

Either we have lots of shills trying to stop rise on Bitstamp, or Bitstamp itself is trying to stop rise.  Bitstamp lost $5 million in coins when the price was $200, then it went up to $500 right after.  If Bitstamp had not bought back those coins yet, that means they would then owe $10 million to customers.  Is Bitstamp trying to stop the rise so they have to pay back less money to customers?




650. Post 15003333 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

$500 is locked in now, so not much downside exists anymore at current price.



651. Post 15003387 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Tzupy on May 28, 2016, 09:21:24 PM
Market leader Huobi is going to run out of steam...

Except you're a known shill and every single one of your posts claims the price will "crash any second"

Here's one of your last useless HERP DE DER posts.  Looks like that May 24th prediction didn't work out too well huh, shill?

Quote from: Tzupy on May 24, 2016, 11:21:34 AM
The evolution of the bid sum on various exchanges does not support a bullish scenario.



652. Post 15003483 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Tzupy on May 24, 2016, 11:21:34 AM
PS. Found a scenario that is in line with my expectations.
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/bRHCR1I2-Bitcoin-The-End-of-an-Era/

So basically you are even more stupid than MatTheCat and wanted to short the halving with your May 24th prediction there.  But we all know nobody is that fucking stupid.  You're just an actual shill account, likely sold off to some banker for $200 a year or two ago.



653. Post 15003560 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: clopoterian on May 28, 2016, 09:48:29 PM
asdfasdfsdfgasdfgadfasdfasdf

LOL jew shills




654. Post 15003633 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

It's over for all these beta male shills rubbing their rat claws together cackling about shekels and interest rates.  The spaceship has been loaded with the rocket fuel and you must deal with all the unpleasantries of the entire universe in which you created.




655. Post 15006231 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

This is the million dollar question:

Quote from: r0ach on May 29, 2016, 06:28:51 AM
Since MatTheCat is the type of person who would run a fractional reserve BTC exchange, what do you think about this illogical market activity on Bitstamp, Mat?  Is it Ethereum scammers trying to suppress BTC price so their scamcoin doesn't collapse, or is it the Bitstamp exchange owners themselves doing it because they had $5 million in coins stolen a year ago and don't want price to go up?





656. Post 15012083 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: podyx on May 29, 2016, 12:44:45 PM
Didn't notice other exchanges

I want you to deal with your problems by becoming rich you stupid sloth.



657. Post 15013141 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

adamstgBit is gonna barf

Quote from: r0ach on May 27, 2016, 02:20:42 AM
It's happening:




Which then leads into vomit inducing pump












658. Post 15013175 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: MingLee on May 29, 2016, 07:56:17 PM
it might break $800

LOL, ONLY $800 ? FUCK YOU



659. Post 15013334 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: dumbfbrankings on May 29, 2016, 07:58:27 PM
Well, it looks like we are the New Aryan Wealthy Elite gentlement.

Department of Bitcoin replaces developer Mike Hearn with rapper Mike Jones - Price immediately quadruples.




660. Post 15013699 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Oh shit, we might really really really be going to moon:

<hellomoto> Cant even purchase bitcoin with Coinbase
<hellomoto> I think they ran out of Bitcoins



661. Post 15015153 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

It's going to level at 3750 yuan then make the jump to 3800 yuan



662. Post 15020915 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Nice, the jew shills are claiming an auction where people typically have to pay higher than market rate is going to cause a dump on June 21st - because that's what people obviously do right?  Buy something and then sell it cheaper for no reason?  Nice try jew shills!  Better work on your propaganda.

Quote from: r0ach on May 28, 2016, 03:39:51 PM
Oriental dog does not approve of dishonorable behavior of anti-bitcoin, jew shills in Bitcoin speculation thread




663. Post 15021607 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):




664. Post 15021702 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: petahashminer on May 30, 2016, 03:30:35 PM


lol what is the meaning of this?

we are going  up or down?

There's a strong uptrend still.



665. Post 15022730 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: r0ach on May 30, 2016, 05:07:18 PM
<r0ach> haha now btc pumps off the floor
<r0ach> the chinese are ruthless against weak hands

Chinese pumpers from the sky.  If you short Bitcoin, you will die.





666. Post 15022914 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):








667. Post 15023040 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: finkelsteinMonster on May 30, 2016, 05:29:45 PM
^Remember how you used to be relevant?




668. Post 15024758 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: r0ach on May 30, 2016, 08:37:53 PM






669. Post 15025012 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: doc12 on May 30, 2016, 08:59:12 PM
Me too, but I dont invest more then I can afford to loose. So no extra BTC for me atm  Sad

I just buy until the price of the ones I already have goes up.



670. Post 15025996 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Gold is bout to dump below $1200 while BTC goes up heh.



671. Post 15033024 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: podyx on May 31, 2016, 01:57:28 PM
What's going on with ETH...

A pump and dump scamcoin seeking momentum traders to dump on to become new bagholders.  The Ethereum pumpers are way underwater trying to prop it up and trying to give the illusion of strength now praying someone will buy them.



672. Post 15038127 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

When Bitcoin double bottoms at $520 floor after rise to begin the journey to absurdly high territory:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYDAF6NbgKc



673. Post 15047556 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: clopoterian on June 01, 2016, 12:31:40 PM
Ding dong, the witch is dead!

Ethereum pumper only has 2000 BTC left to support before his pump collapses and Ethereum drops back down to 0.016 or worse.

Your daily, why Ethereum is a useless scamcoin post here:

Quote from: r0ach on June 01, 2016, 04:57:54 PM
The Ethereum Paradox

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0

Why proof of stake has no value:

Since Satoshi did not solve the Byzantine generals problem, this means confirmations are completely arbitrary.  So why are two confirmations more useful in Bitcoin (PoW) than one?  Because it's an open entropy system where over a period of time, it's either unlikely or statistically impossible for someone to maintain a monopoly on block validation when there is no upper limit to confirmations.

Recursive systems like proof of stake tend to permanently monopolize block validation by design, with no real fault or state recovery to fix it once it goes off the rails.  The act of introducing interest compounds this problem even more.  This makes a proof of stake confirmation essentially worthless due to being a bounded entropy system.

On top of being worthless, proof of stake is also a permissioned ledger.  The purpose of mining in Bitcoin is to create a permanent decentralized exchange peg, which thus results in a permissionless system.



674. Post 15047761 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: 600watt on June 01, 2016, 05:26:04 PM
pls, everyone, do not quote trolls.



675. Post 15049717 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Where is that BBW Izabella Kaminska



676. Post 15050423 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: USB-S on June 01, 2016, 08:48:12 PM
Where is that BBW Izabella Kaminska
Wasn't Izabella the sexy journalist girl, who fuded bitcoin in the Veer documentary. Claiming something like wealth redistribution is retarded or something like that.

If that's the case, than that girl has been naughty indeed.



/Confirmed: https://youtu.be/8zKuoqZLyKg?t=39m

It's a Polish Jewess that doesn't want to see the neo-feudalism through usury, Jewish banking system overthrown.  She's shilling for the tribe while pretending the people she's shilling against are too dumb to figure out what's going on.  Unfortunately for her, this is not the case, and the act of intensifying her shilling only paints her and her kind as obvious targets as the masters of the system of fraud for retribution.  The more she shills, the more damage against herself she does until it's a repeat of WWII all over again.




677. Post 15052710 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Cuntabula on June 02, 2016, 03:57:23 AM
Shalom, Rabbi! Cheesy

Rubbing your rat claws together fantasizing about the clanging of shekels I see.




678. Post 15058243 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: r0ach on June 02, 2016, 03:01:18 PM
$535 floor too strong.  It's going to jump back into this channel again:





679. Post 15059737 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: tomothy on June 02, 2016, 04:00:42 PM
$535 floor too strong.  It's going to jump back into this channel again:



I wanted to ask more about your thoughts on this possible jump back into the above mentioned channel; then the price rose ~$4 lol. What is the range of that channel that we would expect it to stay within, 3620 - 3580 ish? It seemed before that 3600 was acting as support until it broke.

The position to be taken is not to be mistaken for attempted financial advice or education, only a description, just an observation, of price movement in this thread of Jewish shill degeneration.



680. Post 15063049 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: pariahbit on June 03, 2016, 12:37:53 AM
http://www.hidemypen.com/browse.php?u=hB%2BGHTu4JAyxPjhUCE8Vbq4CoN%2BCZ4RROCZtPtcDbU%2BdGnY0aC23wvBM4esTyXPJWZnseHKM0BSQvAK8wgwFAqvCNHb3paF8HOEfcw%3D%3D&b=5

It appears you may be a paid shill using a proxy service and accidentally gave that away...



681. Post 15082939 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: gizmoh on June 04, 2016, 05:49:27 PM
Nice Crisis coming for the Halving, Good FUD to trade on  Cheesy

http://www.coindesk.com/crisis-halving-bitcoin-mining/

Lol, good old Crapdesk and Crapbase showing their true colors shilling for Ethereum and Goldman Sachs.  The last halving I tink the hash rate temporarily dropped 10%.  This time the 16nm miners are being sold by places like Antminer right at the same time of halving.  The hash rate will probably be close to the same or maybe even go up from 16nm miners.

It's also obvious Fred Ehrsam attempted to insider trade Ethereum and got burned when it didn't go up like he wanted.  That's why they're shilling so hard now.  He's bagholding a bunch of worthless Ethereum along with Goldman Sachs and others.  They're looking for someone to dump that useless IPO scamcoin on and they know their scamcoin crashes when Bitcoin price goes up.



682. Post 15084521 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: TERA on June 04, 2016, 09:47:46 PM
Quick question: What if the moon is on the opposite side of the planet from your current position? Does that mean that if something goes to the moon, it actually goes down?

Good job not buying before it went up.  Now you've turned into a peasant trying to beg for somebody to dump coins on you at a lower rate.  Even the most annoying bears in the world now like MatTheCat are saying it's going over $1200.



683. Post 15092173 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: TERA on June 05, 2016, 07:27:01 AM
I actually don't trade Bitcoin anymore because it's not volatile enough

lol?



684. Post 15095503 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: TReano on June 05, 2016, 11:37:20 PM
Bitcoin Block Reward Halving Countdown:
Only 35 more days!


I don't think it will matter much... If anything it well be sell the "news" .. If you can call it news at all since everybody knows about it for years.

The halving isn't a "news" you fools, it's a fundamental that changes cost of production.



685. Post 15118628 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Just saw some scammy shit happen on BitFinex.  This is what just caused that flash crash, a single 0.09 btc sell:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1502745.0



686. Post 15131165 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Assmaster2000 on June 08, 2016, 11:49:22 AM
Ether

Keep posting about your Ethereum IPO scamcoin trying to trick people into buying it so I can post this every single time you do:

The Ethereum Paradox

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0

Quote from: r0ach on May 20, 2016, 01:32:04 PM
Why proof of stake has no value:

Since Satoshi did not solve the Byzantine generals problem, this means confirmations are completely arbitrary.  So why are two confirmations more useful in Bitcoin (PoW) than one?  Because it's an open entropy system where over a period of time, it's either unlikely or statistically impossible for someone to maintain a monopoly on block validation when there's no upper limit to confirmations.

Recursive systems like proof of stake tend to permanently monopolize block validation by design, with no real fault or state recovery to fix it once it goes off the rails.  The act of introducing interest compounds this problem even more.  This makes a proof of stake confirmation essentially worthless due to being a bounded entropy system.

On top of being worthless, proof of stake is also a permissioned ledger.  The purpose of mining in Bitcoin is to create a permanent decentralized exchange peg, which thus results in a permissionless system.



687. Post 15131352 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Assmaster2000 on June 08, 2016, 07:17:02 PM
More attempts to try and trick people into buying an IPO scamcoin called Ethereum

Keep going, I can do this all day.  The more you try to shill for the Ethereum IPO scamcoin, the more people will see this post.  Yes, they might get upset about spamming, but it will do more damage to your Ethereum scamcoin for people to see this than it does to me:


Quote from: r0ach on May 20, 2016, 01:32:04 PM
The Ethereum Paradox

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0

Why proof of stake has no value:

Since Satoshi did not solve the Byzantine generals problem, this means confirmations are completely arbitrary.  So why are two confirmations more useful in Bitcoin (PoW) than one?  Because it's an open entropy system where over a period of time, it's either unlikely or statistically impossible for someone to maintain a monopoly on block validation when there's no upper limit to confirmations.

Recursive systems like proof of stake tend to permanently monopolize block validation by design, with no real fault or state recovery to fix it once it goes off the rails.  The act of introducing interest compounds this problem even more.  This makes a proof of stake confirmation essentially worthless due to being a bounded entropy system.

On top of being worthless, proof of stake is also a permissioned ledger.  The purpose of mining in Bitcoin is to create a permanent decentralized exchange peg, which thus results in a permissionless system.



688. Post 15158844 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):




689. Post 15167726 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: TERA on June 11, 2016, 08:00:35 PM
You don't understand Bitcoin traders:  They have a binary view of investing in which you are a bull all in 100% of your net worth in Bitcoin, possibly with leverage, or you are a bear with 100% fiat and possibly short position.

Correct, and this is why the bear whales always lose.  You have to be a complete lunatic to short Bitcoin with your entire life savings.  There are far more people willing to buy all in.



690. Post 15183137 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on June 13, 2016, 12:09:36 AM
alright, no more jokes from me...

wasn't bashing ethereum, alluding to volatility.  Shocked




691. Post 15209680 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

It's on now.

Quote from: r0ach on June 14, 2016, 05:59:34 PM
Bitcoin has now completed a giant, two year long cup and handle.  For any TA illiterate, that means likelihood of skyrocketing soon = high:





692. Post 15210975 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on June 14, 2016, 08:04:18 PM
ETH has been flat for 3 months. The pump is over. Only thing left is the eventual dump.
pump never really even started m8,lol

Ethereum is a useless scamcoin.  Nobody is falling for your shit:

Quote from: r0ach on May 20, 2016, 01:32:04 PM

The Ethereum Paradox

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0

Why proof of stake has no value:

Since Satoshi did not solve the Byzantine generals problem, this means confirmations are completely arbitrary.  So why are two confirmations more useful in Bitcoin (PoW) than one?  Because it's an open entropy system where over a period of time, it's either unlikely or statistically impossible for someone to maintain a monopoly on block validation when there is no upper limit to confirmations.

Recursive systems like proof of stake tend to permanently monopolize block validation by design, with no real fault or state recovery to fix it once it goes off the rails.  The act of introducing interest compounds this problem even more.  This makes a proof of stake confirmation essentially worthless due to being a bounded entropy system.

On top of being worthless, proof of stake is also a permissioned ledger.  The purpose of mining in Bitcoin is to create a permanent decentralized exchange peg, which thus results in a permissionless system.



693. Post 15214979 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 15, 2016, 04:32:10 AM
When's ETH make the switch to POS? There should be a moment of popcorn.

Vitalik scamming live on camera

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1496403.0



694. Post 15222650 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

1/2 of volume was shorts and Bitcoin is still going straight up lol:

Quote from: r0ach on June 15, 2016, 03:22:57 PM
Just like at the start of the rally when the west originally hit $480, the west just became more bullish than China and converged upwards while China was asleep, temporarily reaching higher prices than China with the west forming an upward channel at the same time.





695. Post 15222831 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: bitconerian on June 15, 2016, 03:50:32 PM
not like Ether's natural

Have fun losing everything holding your Ethereum scamcoin:

Quote from: r0ach on May 20, 2016, 01:32:04 PM

The Ethereum Paradox

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0

Why proof of stake has no value:

Since Satoshi did not solve the Byzantine generals problem, this means confirmations are completely arbitrary.  So why are two confirmations more useful in Bitcoin (PoW) than one?  Because it's an open entropy system where over a period of time, it's either unlikely or statistically impossible for someone to maintain a monopoly on block validation when there is no upper limit to confirmations.

Recursive systems like proof of stake tend to permanently monopolize block validation by design, with no real fault or state recovery to fix it once it goes off the rails.  The act of introducing interest compounds this problem even more.  This makes a proof of stake confirmation essentially worthless due to being a bounded entropy system.

On top of being worthless, proof of stake is also a permissioned ledger.  The purpose of mining in Bitcoin is to create a permanent decentralized exchange peg, which thus results in a permissionless system.



696. Post 15227182 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: dumbfbrankings on June 15, 2016, 09:50:04 PM
In your subjective opinion... when does it get high? 25 cents, 50, $1 for one of the smallest transactions you can make?

Since most people in the speculation section are morons, let me explain it for you.  Even if you raised the block size to 8MB, that would only allow Bitcoin to have market penetration as a checkbook type device for large value transactions in middle/upper middle class, first world nations of around $10,000 transactions and higher.  There is absolutely no fucking room whatsoever on anything that uses a blockchain for microtransactions.  

Even with 8MB blocks, fees would still be high and you'd only use it for huge transactions.  The only people doing transactions on the blockchain will be rich people, or financial entities doing settlement transactions.  Anyone not doing high value transactions will be pushed to off-chain solutions, or second tier networks of Bitcoin like Lightning Network where you can do all the  cheap microtransactions you want.

You will never have microtransactions directly on chain.  You will never have cheap transactions while using a blockchain either.  They're only suitable for high value transactions.



697. Post 15227272 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: dumbfbrankings on June 15, 2016, 10:20:11 PM
In your subjective opinion... when does it get high? 25 cents, 50, $1 for one of the smallest transactions you can make?

Since most people in the speculation section are morons, let me explain it for you.  Even if you raised the block size to 8MB, that would only allow Bitcoin to have market penetration as a checkbook type device for large value transactions in middle/upper middle class, first world nations of around $10,000 transactions and higher.  There is absolutely no fucking room whatsoever on anything that uses a blockchain for microtransactions.  

Even with 8MB blocks, fees would still be high and you'd only use it for huge transactions.  The only people doing transactions on the blockchain will be rich people, or financial entities doing settlement transactions.  Anyone not doing high value transactions will be pushed to off-chain solutions, or second tier networks of Bitcoin like Lightning Network where you can do all the  cheap microtransactions you want.

You will never have microtransactions directly on chain.  You will never have cheap transactions while using a blockchain either.  They're only suitable for high value transactions.

My car will never go 300 MPH, and would break if it somehow could. Does that mean I should keep a speed limiter in place to keep it under 10 MPH?

Invalid example.  Not everyone on the planet has to pay for your gas (verification).



698. Post 15227816 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: dumbfbrankings on June 15, 2016, 10:38:57 PM
I remember you used to write somewhat coherently on raising the blocksize, if not everything else, what happened? Drank too deeply from Gregory's cup?

You are arguing for microtransactions when it's impossible to have microtransactions on a blockchain.  Yes, 5 cent and 20 cent transactions are still cheap because even if you raised blocksize 10x higher, the transaction fee would still eventually become so high that only $10,000 transactions and more would be valid even with 8-10MB blocks.  The only thing that would allow you to do microtransactions is a second tier system like Lightning Network or off-chain solutions like Circle and Coinbase debit cards.  Anything directly on chain will always be expensive.

In short, you make no valid points because you are arguing for microtransactions directly on-chain when it's not possible.



699. Post 15227913 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Jord33 on June 15, 2016, 11:36:36 PM
The blockchains down, wtf....

Jew banker shills have sunk to an all new low of desperation attempts in disinfo tactics.



700. Post 15228319 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Tzupy on June 16, 2016, 12:21:02 AM
Just flipped, damn... I went long earlier today at 685$, but since it looked slumpy 2 hours ago I closed at 692$... Aargh! Angry

Good job, MatTheCat



701. Post 15228492 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: chesthing on June 16, 2016, 12:50:34 AM
If China gov doesn't come out with another ban on bitcoin like last pump, WHO KNOWS HOW HIGH THIS WILL GO

$3200



702. Post 15239982 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: MySecondCunt on June 16, 2016, 12:39:14 PM
> sovereign and corporate and private debt levels are sane
You don't understand what debt is. It's not a bad thing you imagine it to be.
If you owe me money, for instance, I'd be much less likely to rob or kill you. Because then you'll never pay me back.

>that monetary and fiscal policies are working just fine, the economies are all healthy
Seems to be working great thus far. Also, "Fine" compared to what?

Wow, jew bankers are still spamming their propaganda in this thread.  Everyone understands what debt is.  A debt based currency is neo-feudalism through usury.  Lending "money" (more like thin air) expands the money supply, but since the money supply is debt, you're just increasing the amount of money owed to the central authority who issued it originally (always jew bankers).  The interest requires an infinite growth model to service and can never be paid back or the system would collapse.  If you enjoy being a slave to the jews, go ahead and get you some of that nice debt based fiat, for everyone else, there's Bitcoin and metals.




703. Post 15313414 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Hyperjacked on June 22, 2016, 01:30:00 AM
I could be wrong but I could care less since I've made numerous calls in a row...

If you don't put your money where your mouth is, what you type is useless.

Quote from: r0ach on June 21, 2016, 11:06:21 PM
Last trade:





704. Post 15323303 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

This dump was a joke:

Quote from: r0ach on June 22, 2016, 06:20:18 PM
When it dumped, the sell side walls on Finex were fake all the way up to like $650.  It was the same quantity and size of walls that were used during the entire rally that are always pulled.  It was just an orchestrated pre-halving china shakeout.  There was actually 0 resistance all the way back up to pre-dump price, which is why it's about to shoot back up again.



705. Post 15328313 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: dumbfbrankings on June 23, 2016, 04:16:55 AM
Not really, this was the halving pump. Take a look at litecoin for how those work.

The BTC price peaks post halving, not pre-halving.

Anyone with an IQ over 2 can look at your post history and May 2016 join date and see you're a paid anti-bitcoin shill account.  Keep rubbing your rat claws together fantasizing about the clanging of shekels from your jew banker overlords.




706. Post 15362397 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

I think this might have been the only reason the market dumped in the first place:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1413819.msg15362332#msg15362332



707. Post 15416582 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: becoin on June 29, 2016, 09:28:25 PM
Stop selling God damn it!
Sorry, I need one more dip below 600 and then will join you.




708. Post 15459052 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):




709. Post 15463885 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on July 04, 2016, 06:26:36 AM
About Bitcoin price:
why all the fun happens during the weekends?




710. Post 15473656 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

I haven't seen much shilling lately.  Where is Lambchop?




711. Post 15488184 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on July 06, 2016, 04:37:11 AM
The chinese miners are here now whether you like it or not.

What about the Goy?  Do you think the Goys of Summer are driving up the price?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1540867.0



712. Post 15493130 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: respawn2 on July 06, 2016, 03:39:44 PM
No. If anything, it would do the just the opposite, introduce an *inflationary* scenario. It is supposed to stimulate *buying*, and disincentivize "delayed gratification," e.g. keeping money in a bank.
Please take Econ 101 or read a book.

Too bad for you Jewish banking shills that negative interest rates had the exact opposite effect and caused people to save more instead of spend in order to offset negative yield.

For other lessons on the future of the world economy:

#1  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1413819.msg15471618#msg15471618

#2  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1413819.msg15473998#msg15473998



713. Post 15495635 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

This is how I feel looking at halving clock:




714. Post 15497155 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: HyphyBTC on July 07, 2016, 04:42:41 AM
Low volume bot trading in China manages to bring the price down with big volume on other exchanges. They don't even try to hide the manipulation, but I don't blame them, traders are blind anyways.

China, with Huobi, its "leading exchange because of volume" drops with around 500 BTC traded, while Bitfinex drops with around 6000 BTC traded. Whats even funnier is that Bitstamp had more volume on this dip than Huobi. The day these Chinese exchanges have fees is the day the whales lose their surefire way to eat up all you minnows.

Yea, was wondering if anyone else noticed this.  Huobi rigged that drop to go as low as possible with 0 volume wash trading.  Meanwhile, the entire sell side is 2-3 fake walls that will be pulled and the rest dust, so it could rise right back up to where it dropped from in seconds if "they" wanted to.



715. Post 15497843 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: ask on July 07, 2016, 06:36:17 AM
DOWN.

What if it goes up?




716. Post 15530056 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: podyx on July 09, 2016, 08:31:00 PM
Bitfinex shorts just got to a new ATH (expressed in USD).

Good luck boys!

Waiting on the short slaughter that's about to commence like






717. Post 15530925 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: Searing on July 10, 2016, 01:17:32 AM





718. Post 15540947 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: Tzupy on July 10, 2016, 09:43:02 PM
Chinese bulls got me worried... The bid sum on Huobi has grown, and the triangle may break up... yikes! Angry

What a Shoah.  Shut it down.  The Chinese have figured it out.  Shut it down.




719. Post 15541645 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: Recordura on July 10, 2016, 11:18:39 PM
Is it supposed to do that?

Africa has detected JIDF intrusion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG0erhuG4HU



720. Post 15569966 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: Bulgarian on July 13, 2016, 11:48:05 AM
The purpose of the athiest religion is promote the Communism and the Homosexuality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuzpFMWReZw



721. Post 15580648 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

After thinking about how to try and improve Bitcoin for years, me and Anonymint both seem to have created the same system independently to give Bitcoin the scaling benefits of DPoS, while maintaining the same basic consensus system of open loop PoW (going from 3 TPS to like 200-1000 TPS):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1550027.0



722. Post 15654648 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: travwill on July 21, 2016, 01:50:51 AM
Man, so the US markets are breaking a new high every day for the last 8 days.  I see the equities doing so strong that BTC isn't as attractive, that can't last and seems like bubble territory in the stock market right now.

I suspect the markets will be propped up for the jewish bankers to try and get their Hillary Clinton sockpuppet into office.  If the markets were tanking while she's running on Obama's legacy, it wouldn't look very good.  When/if Trump wins, I assume they will crash the market like 1 month after he steps into office and try to blame it on him.  Or maybe they will pull the plug and crash the stock market the second they see Hillary can't win.



723. Post 15755072 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Users are discussing adam:




724. Post 16003791 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 21, 2016, 02:04:15 AM
i dont think bitcoin is broken
but it is limited.
unnecessarily limited.

Invest in the #1 altcoin...silver...if you're worried about scalability.  The upside within the next 2 years is probably as high or higher than Bitcoin.  I own some of both.



725. Post 16108645 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Elwar on August 31, 2016, 08:36:21 AM
And the central banks are saying what they're doing isn't enough...that they need to think up some more extreme measures because the market isn't "reacting" the way they'd hoped when they opened the floodgates.

Everybody who is somebody knows there is only 1 option.  The monetary velocity has frozen; the debts are unserviceable; the only way forward is a giant revaluation of gold where all national currencies take a huge haircut in the process.  Each nation can't simultaneously devalue against each other in a currency war because then you accomplish nothing if everyone does it.  Instead of trying to rig gold in place and devalue against each other, they have to let gold float free and then re-integrate it somehow.

If you try to freeze gold in place and just print your way out of it, you get hyperinflation.  If you let gold free float and then let it rise and re-integrate it in some manner, then you might be able to avoid the eventual hyperinflation outcome of printing to avoid deflationary collapse.  It's kind of a situation where the writing is on the wall for the death of these fiat currencies, so they can either transition to gold and silver in a semi-turbulent but non-armageddon manner, or just have a new Dark Ages that comes with Weimar republic, wheelbarrow hyperinflation after they have to print to avoid deflationary collapse.

Of course, the conspiracy is, they might WANT a hard collapse to use as an excuse to usher in some new Jewish slave planation government model and one world currency they've cooked up.  The Jews love to hawk this stuff off to useful idiot Goys in high positions of power pretending they're all on the same team of "high tier big powerful guys", when the team is really just Zionist jews vs everyone else.  The goys in expensive suits are just disposable useful idiots who will be tossed out with the trash.  

All of you moron branch bankers reading this need to turn on the Jews before they turn on you.  When they took over Russia, the first thing they did was holocaust all the goys.  They'll try to put anyone in a high position of power who isn't a member of team Zionist in front of a firing squad after the dollar implodes and you have world chaos, just like Russia all over again.  And that's what will happen even if you willingly act as their useful idiot servant.  Why do you think they're trying to start war with Russia?  Because Russia was the last major victim of the Jews and they refuse to be scammed and murdered again.



726. Post 16118885 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: spiderbrain on September 01, 2016, 11:12:54 PM
And the central banks are saying what they're doing isn't enough...that they need to think up some more extreme measures because the market isn't "reacting" the way they'd hoped when they opened the floodgates.

Everybody who is somebody knows there is only 1 option.  The monetary velocity has frozen; the debts are unserviceable; the only way forward is a giant revaluation of gold where all national currencies take a huge haircut in the process.  Each nation can't simultaneously devalue against each other in a currency war because then you accomplish nothing if everyone does it.  Instead of trying to rig gold in place and devalue against each other, they have to let gold float free and then re-integrate it somehow.

If you try to freeze gold in place and just print your way out of it, you get hyperinflation.  If you let gold free float and then let it rise and re-integrate it in some manner, then you might be able to avoid the eventual hyperinflation outcome of printing to avoid deflationary collapse.  It's kind of a situation where the writing is on the wall for the death of these fiat currencies, so they can either transition to gold and silver in a semi-turbulent but non-armageddon manner, or just have a new Dark Ages that comes with Weimar republic, wheelbarrow hyperinflation after they have to print to avoid deflationary collapse.

Of course, the conspiracy is, they might WANT a hard collapse to use as an excuse to usher in some new Jewish slave planation government model and one world currency they've cooked up.  The Jews love to hawk this stuff off to useful idiot Goys in high positions of power pretending they're all on the same team of "high tier big powerful guys", when the team is really just Zionist jews vs everyone else.  The goys in expensive suits are just disposable useful idiots who will be tossed out with the trash.  

All of you moron branch bankers reading this need to turn on the Jews before they turn on you.  When they took over Russia, the first thing they did was holocaust all the goys.  They'll try to put anyone in a high position of power who isn't a member of team Zionist in front of a firing squad after the dollar implodes and you have world chaos, just like Russia all over again.  And that's what will happen even if you willingly act as their useful idiot servant.  Why do you think they're trying to start war with Russia?  Because Russia was the last major victim of the Jews and they refuse to be scammed and murdered again.


I was with you up until the racism.

Stop being a coward.  Nobody says it's "racist" to talk about the Italian mafia.  It just so happens there's a Jewish mafia running the media, political system, and financial system that is more crooked and powerful than the Italian mafia ever dreamed of.  If they fail to police their own kind and don't place all these sith lords like Soros in a dungeon, the world will eventually collecively punish them again.  

It's a Machiavellian issue.  They operate as a hive mind collective, so just tossing one in jail probably does nothing.  You can't beat collectivists without a collectivist solution.  That is why collective punishment was used against them the first time and is likely the only way to fix the problem at all.  If you're happy being a Jew servant and being financially and cognitively raped for your entire existence, then good for you, but not everyone is a beta male servant boy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuzpFMWReZw



727. Post 16129507 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Dafar on September 02, 2016, 05:22:25 AM

Stop being a coward.  Nobody says it's "racist" to talk about the Italian mafia.  It just so happens there's a Jewish mafia running the media, political system, and financial system that is more crooked and powerful than the Italian mafia ever dreamed of.  If they fail to police their own kind and don't place all these sith lords like Soros in a dungeon, the world will eventually collecively punish them again.  

It's a Machiavellian issue.  They operate as a hive mind collective, so just tossing one in jail probably does nothing.  You can't beat collectivists without a collectivist solution.  That is why collective punishment was used against them the first time and is likely the only way to fix the problem at all.  If you're happy being a Jew servant and being financially and cognitively raped for your entire existence, then good for you, but not everyone is a beta male servant boy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuzpFMWReZw


r0ach wants another holocaust?

 Shocked




728. Post 16147643 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on September 03, 2016, 04:46:13 AM
Make a forecast bro!




729. Post 16150277 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Wonder how Satoshi doesn't know Augur is dysfunctional.



730. Post 16281231 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: VC George on September 16, 2016, 11:49:11 PM
Problems are keeping up...
https://blockchain.info/tx/785cc496c9bd7c61a0d42b278134259cb5735fc7a4807552430b74af4cce8c96
I mean is it normal for a transaction to take so long, even if the blocks are clogged or something?
And if so since this transaction is actually a payment from a hot wallet I think am a bit screwed if it
never gets confirmed.

This is how you Bitcoin:
(I had to make this picture for MatTheMat)




731. Post 16470201 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: DaRude on October 06, 2016, 02:14:56 AM
and that's with a stable price in last 3months. Where is the volume coming from?  Huh can't be same people selling to themselves just to pay exchange fees  

The price was like $645 in India yesterday.



732. Post 16470292 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: UngratefulTony on October 06, 2016, 06:21:33 AM
Du u have a related steem article I may reference?

No, but you may read this:

Quote from: r0ach
The sequence of events of WWII without US, Russian, or Jewish propaganda, and why history repeats with the rise of the alt-right being unstoppable: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnu5uW9No8g



733. Post 16484036 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

There's my chart 2 weeks ago.  Cue bob Seger song "still the same"

http://youtu.be/HjDpKeiYxOU



https://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/bitcoin-market-in-one-picture-without-commentary



734. Post 16484775 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Prepare for more "whoa , this bitcoin thing is an uncorrelated asset" spam in mainstream finance.  Well duh you fucking idiots, if it wasn't we wouldn't have been holding the stuff in the first place.



735. Post 16488403 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: toknormal on October 07, 2016, 03:53:59 PM
Lets warm up with a bit of light shilling to start with




736. Post 16495373 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Bitcoin price bump from keeping Anthony Weiner out of office




737. Post 16510861 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: xdrzrex on October 09, 2016, 08:53:00 PM
Yes, hopefully the price will go up soon. But stock markets offer good reward as well these days.

Stock market is just another Kosher Khazar Klan scam at this point.



738. Post 16576981 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: r0ach on October 15, 2016, 10:54:07 PM
We also had Bill Gross recommend Bitcoin

It's funny how he recommended gold + bitcoin but didn't mention silver.  The guy is worth 2.5 billion dollars.  He could probably single handedly pump silver a ton and make lots of money.  I assume he doesn't mess with that market because the bankers would punish him in some way or kill him.

When the debt based system blows up, I could see Bitcoin making a run to something crazy like $10,000-$40,000 in a short time, especially if it's used as a medium to do things like facilitate gold commerce.  That's a +15-60x.  It sounds stupidly high, but if every millionaire (not even counting billionaires) hedged only 1% of their wealth in Bitcoin, that would be $7800 a coin fully liquid market cap, which would in reality be much higher price because no markets are fully liquid.  

Of course, how many millionaires are going to lose everything because they were all-in on equities and facebook stocks?  It's a hard picture to put together when plenty of millionaires are going to become instantly broke.  Silver is looking to be around a +10-45x, so it will be interesting to see which one performs better given all the manipulations involved either way and how much wealth remains liquid vs how much is frozen or destroyed somehow.

I currently use silver as a savings account and Bitcoin as a checking account.  When I need to spend fiat, I have a reloadable Bitpay Visa card.  You can have $0 on it and send some Bitcoin to an address linked to the Bitpay account, and within 60 seconds your Visa card is credited with fiat.  No need to even use a bank now.



739. Post 16584328 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Why most people, even experts, are going to get crushed in the coming world market collapses and why you HAVE to play the long game:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1413819.msg16583789#msg16583789



740. Post 16757767 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Meuh6879 on November 02, 2016, 08:36:54 PM
great year, isn't it ?

Yes:

http://truepundit.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/



741. Post 16760592 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Newsflash:  Some of what's going on right now is people positioning for the pre-pump of gold, silver, and Bitcoin if a Trump win is announced.  Gains if Trump wins, no losses if he loses = asymmetric trade.



742. Post 16760639 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: TERA on November 03, 2016, 06:19:17 AM
So I should be expecting that test of $660 on Nov 9?

Not really since both Clinton and Trump were going to announce massive public works projects (out of control spending stimulus) and Shillary was probably going to try and implement "basic income", because helicopter money as a one-off event wouldn't stop terminal decline in monetary velocity leading to cascading deflationary collapse.  A last ditch effort at saving/extending their fractional reserve, debt based currency scam.



743. Post 16781004 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on November 05, 2016, 03:28:53 AM
chart voodoo is a useful skill.

Torque nailed it.

we did it, we finally did it, we stabilized bitcoin!!

699.99999

The Goyz in Tha Hood prefer when it goes up instead.



744. Post 16787997 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: TERA on November 05, 2016, 05:33:09 PM
I keep hearing about the election effecting the price of Bitcoin but not which politician will effect the price in which direction

Woke up quick at about noon just thought that there might be a race war soon.  I gotta buy Bitcoin before the day begins before Hillary Clinton declares martial law and bitches about my alt-right friends. Walkin on the sidewalk I damn near went blind, young Bernie Sanders voters throwing up gang signs.  Ran in the house, grabbed a clip, with the AR15 on the side of my hip.  Decided to teach them a 30 round economics lesson, no habla engles was not the right answer to the question.  So I let the Alpine play, with make America great again by Trump W A, it was Pepe Pepe at the top of the list, then I left and went something like this.  Cruisin down the street lookin for the silver store, not derivatives, or shekels galore, went to the park to get the scoop, devil worshiping, child sex trafficking democrats out there cold shootin some hoops.



745. Post 16808952 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Rasmussen polling accidentally releases report showing landslide Trump victory:




746. Post 16819969 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

NYTimes:  "How to think about this election: white working class voters just decided to vote like a minority group. They're >40% of the electorate."

Trump Victory song:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuzpFMWReZw

Bankers, Marxists, Feminists, the lying ass media, SJWs, Cuckolds, Zionists, all defeated in one day.

The media now has ZERO credibility and it's known they were all operating together trying to rig the election.  Guillotines for all and Soros plus the rest of the DNC child trafficking cult to be hunted down like animals.



747. Post 16823277 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: TERA on November 09, 2016, 08:12:32 AM
This move is based on US news and is 60% a USD move rather than a BTC move. It not time for ATH and trains yet.

Guess that answers our question from yesterday.
I was thinking so hard about how the election would affect just Bitcoin, without even thinking of how it would affect the dollar.

Dollar will probably be devalued to boost exports.  The real question is if it's accompanied by some huge restructuring of the entire monetary system or getting rid of the Zionist shitbags at the fed and giving control of currency to treasury where it belongs.  Also, fuck Mark Cuban.  What a fucking scumbag.  Zionist who changed his last name to hide in the US and tried to sabotage Trump and is already kissing his ass 3seconds after Trump wins.

Never forgive, never forget.  No mercy.





748. Post 16828179 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Dafar on November 09, 2016, 04:07:57 PM
Dollar will probably be devalued to boost exports.  The real question is if it's accompanied by some huge restructuring of the entire monetary system or getting rid of the Zionist shitbags at the fed and giving control of currency to treasury where it belongs.  Also, fuck Mark Cuban.  What a fucking scumbag.  Zionist who changed his last name to hide in the US and tried to sabotage Trump and is already kissing his ass 3seconds after Trump wins.

Never forgive, never forget.  No mercy.

[img]https://ounce.me/img/mark-karpeles-euphoric.png[img]


When did this happen? He was shitting on Trump pretty hard before lol

Click his twitter, it's pathetic.

He knows the goyim know and the Pinochet purge of media and banking is coming, along with right wing deathsquads.



749. Post 16871348 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Coindesk is now a pure trash propaganda outlet and must be destroyed

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1680205.0



750. Post 16871732 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: savetherainforest on November 14, 2016, 09:57:00 AM
Coindesk is now a pure trash propaganda outlet and must be destroyed

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1680205.0


You figuring this out just now??  I knew something was weird and they had some sort of agenda like a year ago.... My guess is they got infiltrated and few of the writers are paid ghost writers of the club/establishment.  Smiley

It went from a little shilling here and there to full blown international jewish banking.  Their talking points in that article look like they just cut and paste the protocols of the elders of zion.



751. Post 16879248 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: podyx on November 14, 2016, 08:31:24 PM
Cmon baby, let's see some god damn glow now.


Your wish is granted

https://youtu.be/S51cFBjOoOQ



752. Post 16881851 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Man with down syndrome tackles hillary supporter to make america great again: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0JTl2fVqF8



753. Post 16967186 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Khazar banking mafia at the Federal Reserve tried to dump metals with naked shorts again and seems to have failed.  Now we're on the highway to the danger zone:



This Shanghai metal exchange finally became of some use.



754. Post 16993898 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Not sure if I remember correctly, but I seem to recall price being down last black friday, while this one had a brief $9 pump.



755. Post 17076601 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on December 02, 2016, 10:28:23 PM
I've only ignored 2 trolls in all my time here, and that was because they were truly obnoxious.

The first was MatTheTwat

MatTheMat was one of the few interesting (interesting, not accurate) posters on here:

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1455386.0



756. Post 17076997 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Searing on December 04, 2016, 09:05:14 AM
anyway power games..no clean hands in this issue I'm afraid

By my calculations in observing high value transactions (which is the only thing blockchains can accommodate) in real estate, cars, etc, Bitcoin needs a minimum of 50 TPS or 8 MB blocks + Schnorr sigs to function as a working global monetary system with market penetration in the upper middle class.  If you want to take a fuck everyone and their dumb ideology approach, then you would likely just set it and forget it at that minimum required value and never touch it again.  

So now we have to evaluate if Lightning Network actually takes us over this 50 TPS threshold without introducing more problems than it solves, yet it's not actually possible to evaluate LN because there's no concrete routing solution implemented.  We're kinda just sitting around waiting to see if some guy named Rusty Russler is legit in building this stuff or not, or if it can even be done without increasing centralization more than what it is now.  

The not so conspiracy side claims that since Blockstream is being funded with several millions of dollars, there would need to be a way for them to monetize the system via network effect to regain their capital, meaning the routing would inherently lead to more centralization because they wouldn't make any money otherwise.  So I guess the only way to find out is to follow the money trail and find out if Blockstream is being funded by someone who already holds a large position in BTC and wishes to enhance that value, or by someone who doesn't currently own BTC and wishes to extract from the masses by usury skimming in having a big share of transactions routed to them.

And that is the story of Bitcoin.



757. Post 17086345 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on December 05, 2016, 07:08:03 AM
It's Time

For the Zionists to see silver going up on Italexit and start naked shorting with paper silver that doesn't exist to try and contain the price?






758. Post 17087046 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Austria-exit vote rigged?  Or entirely female voting bloc voting to destroy their own country?  I'm 100% sure it was rigged.  It's well known women are more prone to politically correct Marxist brainwashing, but those differences in numbers seem hugely out of the norm:

http://www.dailystormer.com/austria-womens-rights-responsible-for-far-right-loss-again/



759. Post 17087311 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: gentlemand on December 05, 2016, 11:32:12 AM
Or maybe, y'know, not everyone out there is a foaming anti semite? There are people out there with different points of view.

It looks like you might be a:




760. Post 17087930 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: stereotype on December 05, 2016, 12:38:19 PM
However, does anybody know how many labelled boxes i need to destroy, before i start feeling better about my own scary world?

Just the one that created a media and banking monopoly through ethnocentric nepotism in order to run a malevolent, usury system on everyone else.  Given a choice between being a slave to Zionist bankers or getting rid of them even though it might require breaking some "holy" tenets of political correctness in the process, most non-cuckold males have an easy choice.  Not sure about you guys though.  You seem to have framed your question in a manner where you believe it's normal to commit suicide before inconveniencing someone else's feelings no matter how outrageous of actions they do.  You've demonstrated the stereotypical cuckold thought process perfectly.



761. Post 17091364 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on December 05, 2016, 06:26:06 PM
Or maybe, y'know, not everyone out there is a foaming anti semite? There are people out there with different points of view.

It looks like you might be a:



Scarey conclusions ya make. Why in hell do u talk about Jewish mental health establishment on the speculation-nebulation topic?

Meet our local nazi. He's been trying to rally up people to start another holocaust. Something about murdering innocent children that somehow purifies you. No one knows wtf he's talking about, but there's an Ignore button that makes him stfu for good

Ignore these people at your own peril. At the moment they are monopolizing the public anti-establishment narrative and framing it in simplistic terms. Thanks to vocal people like these we now get to pick sides being either cuckold-zionist-sheeple-puppets, or antisemite-nazi-hatemongers. RIP intelligent debate and nuanced political positions. Hello brave new world of information bubbles and simplistic dogma... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

You are not men, you are children.  Now the men have to come in and fix things.  Look at this EU "senior official" passing legislation that got his own daughter murdered this week:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3998478/Teenage-Afghan-immigrant-arrested-Germany-murder-medical-student.html

We're not sitting around for delusional, leftist cuckolds to get us impoverished through socialism then murdered next.  You children and cuckolds are out.

The only reason this stuff is going on is because the Zionist bankers are trying to preserve their power and decided to flood Europe with rapefugees as a divide and conquer strategy.  Homogeneous nations like Iceland always overthrow their bankers, while nations with a bunch of warring factions can't.  Soros has been caught as one of the actors behind it already.  You have Jewish bankers openly practicing genocide against all 1st world white nations while cuckolds like you cheer them on.  Pure trash.  



762. Post 17091809 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on December 05, 2016, 07:58:33 PM

You are not men, you are children.  Now the men have to come in and fix things.  Look at this EU "senior official" passing legislation that got his own daughter murdered this week:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3998478/Teenage-Afghan-immigrant-arrested-Germany-murder-medical-student.html

We're not sitting around for delusional, leftist cuckolds to get us impoverished through socialism then murdered next.  You children and cuckolds are out.

The only reason this stuff is going on is because the Zionist bankers are trying to preserve their power and decided to flood Europe with rapefugees as a divide and conquer strategy.  Homogeneous nations like Iceland always overthrow their bankers, while nations with a bunch of warring factions can't.  Soros has been caught as one of the actors behind it already.  You have Jewish bankers openly practicing genocide against all 1st world white nations while cuckolds like you cheer them on.  Pure trash.  

It's ok, you children are out anyway.  Nothing you say has any meaning.  Nobody cares.

This is a great example of what I was mentioning.

People invent simplified black/white narratives, define the opposition as sub-human, create derisive labels for them and apply said labels to anyone perceived to be attacking your position.

In this case I wasn't even stating any support for anything, just lamenting the pathetic level of public discourse - yet I still got attacked. Presumably because of my failure to get in line with a particular dogma.

Discord should be sown with style.

Your name is "ErisDiscordia", which is either a female name or some type of extreme beta male name and women do not fight in wars, they're only bystanders then just conform to whoever the winner is.  You have no role in this regardless.  We're not playing games.  We're not trying to impress bimbos.  We're throwing out the children and cuckolds from power to restore order.



763. Post 17092010 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on December 05, 2016, 08:13:18 PM
Your name is "ErisDiscordia", which is either a female name or some type of extreme beta male name and women do not fight in wars, they're only bystanders then just conform to whoever the winner is.  You have no role in this regardless.  We're not playing games.  We're not trying to impress bimbos.  We're throwing out the children and cuckolds from power to restore order.

And your name is Roach Smiley

I suppose by calling others "beta" you define yourself as "alpha". By any chance, have you heard what Tywin Lannister has to say about men who say "I am the king!"?

No, I'm just a regular person surrounded by shabbos goy cuckolds.  2-3% or so of people fought in the war against the British in the US while the other 98% stand on the sideline and conform to whoever the winner is.  Those 2-3% aren't the alpha males persay, but they damn sure weren't the cuckolds.



764. Post 17093486 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote
“Did China ask us if it was OK to devalue their currency ..... ? I don’t think so!” Trump tweeted.




765. Post 17096583 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: nioc on December 06, 2016, 02:00:25 AM
Being the great procrastinater  that I am I didn't fill out the last census form that was mailed to me.  So they sent a nice women to my house to ask me the questions.  The last one was, what is my race.  My answer was, if you want to pigeon hole me you can put me down as mammal.  She just stared blankly at me.  To help her out of her predicament I said, oh you're looking for a race...human...human race.

Nice job you Marxists have done for the human race there:




766. Post 17130732 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on December 09, 2016, 01:25:32 PM
Adam's favourite sort of joke bitcoin price prediction was $32,000.

I did a lot of calculations based on various factors and market caps to try and find a realistic Bitcoin ceiling price.  I can't recall them all, but think I came up with anything from:

- 250 billion if there were around 4 different dominant chains (or maybe 1 trillion for a single chain)

- 420 billion ($20,000 per coin)

- around $7000 - $8000 per coin if every millionaire hedged 1% of their wealth in Bitcoin.  But that would be a fully liquid, fully capitalized market where everyone can cash out, so it would likely be something 10x higher than that at $80,000 per coin or $1.6 trillion market cap

I believe there's also only around 2.5 billion ounces of investment grade silver bullion sitting around (but estimates of 10-20 billion total in existence, not investment grade bullion though), so the silver market cap is only like $42 billion.  I think it would be very strange if the Bitcoin market cap went higher than silver.  When the shit hits the fan, or they implement a new Bretton Woods to revalue gold, they will have to set the gold price to something around $20,000 an ounce at 40% backing (the historical backing ratio).  The price of silver will likely spike to anywhere from $666 - $1333 in said event (15-30:1 GSR), so the market cap of Bitcoin going "too high" compared to other assets isn't really a problem when things like metals eventually break free from banker manipulation.

In other news, the govt really doesn't like #pizzagate, so whatever you do, don't say anything about #pizzagate anywhere because the govt specifically forbids you to talk about #pizzagate.




767. Post 17135119 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on December 09, 2016, 08:47:37 PM
Logarithmically speaking, we are right on track....

I thought everyone was here because we're on the wrong track:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVSDfCzkzCA



768. Post 17139717 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: criptix on December 10, 2016, 08:37:47 AM
I think the power is out. Im awaiting a big dump close to xmas.

Lowest it can dump to is $720ish, while the current upside targets are $815 and $900.




769. Post 17140881 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):




770. Post 17151489 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Torque on December 11, 2016, 03:24:45 PM
because the gold derivative price is fixed by colluding bank cartels and the underlying physical gold isn't there any longer anyway. The whole PMs market is one giant, global Ponzi scam.

The death of the dollar is set in stone now with what's happening in the bond markets.  No foreign countries want worthless US debt paper at all anymore.  They're not only not buying it, they're also dumping the ones they already have.  When the debt market has no buyers, the interest rates skyrocket, then the price to service the debt exceeds what can be paid and the debt is defaulted on.  Or they can just print and buy their own bonds, monetizing the debt and end in hyperinflation.

Regardless of how it plays out, the end is drawing near for the dollar and metals are going to the moon soon.  There might be a deflationary crash as all the debts are defaulted on that takes the price of everything down, but there's no way I'm sitting on the sidelines with worthless fiat waiting to buy that when there will be bank holidays and capital controls when it happens preventing you from doing anything.  

There may also be a surprise new Bretton Woods that comes out of nowhere where they just revalue gold at $10,000 - $20,000 overnight.  Having 0 metals or sitting on the sideline waiting for a deflationary crash to buy isn't a very good idea.  I use metals as a savings account (specifically silver) and Bitcoin as a checking account because there is no way possible Bitcoin is lower on Exter's inverse pyramid than gold and silver are:



It is also pointless to buy gold over silver right now:

Quote from: r0ach on December 09, 2016, 10:10:03 PM
If every millionaire hedged 1% of their wealth into Bitcoin, the price would be around $8000 per coin fully liquid, fully capitalized.  But markets aren't fully liquid, so the price per coin would be something like 10x that at maybe $80,000 per coin.  So a +100x from current price.

Now, looking at metals instead, if they do a new Bretton Woods, they would take gold to at least $20,000 at the 40% historical backing rate.  The GSR (gold to silver ratio) would spike somewhere between 15:1 to 30:1 off that, putting silver anywhere from $666-$1333.  That is a +39 to +78x.  As you can see, the upside on silver for wealth transferrence is basically the same as Bitcoin while otherwise having far less risk attributes.  

Quote from: r0ach on December 10, 2016, 01:22:16 PM
Gold and silver move at something like 0.85 correlation and it's much easier to move the silver market than gold.  Whatever happens to gold, silver is coming along for the ride.  You've seen how easy it is to move the Bitcoin market and the silver market cap is barely even larger than BTC.

People who are familiar with metals also tend to completely ignore gold and buy only silver when the GSR is over 50:1, then dump silver for gold when the GSR is 30:1 or lower.  If the price of gold spiked to some insane number and the silver price had not caught up, everyone and their mom will immediately dump gold to buy the undervalued silver.  There is no viable situation in the universe where the price of gold skyrockets and silver doesn't.

For actual market analysts and traders, the GSR charts have a hard triple top right under a hard double top, indicating there is nowhere for the value of silver to go except up in relation to gold and that it will likely return to 30:1 or lower in the near future:



After it breaks into the 20's:1 area, that's when people will start dumping silver for gold and it reverses to start the cycle all over again.

If we have a deflationary crash rather than hyperinflation, the DOW floor is around 6000.  The historical DOW to gold ratio seems to trend to around 3-5:1, so even in a deflationary crash the value of gold can still go to $2000, which would probably take silver to a 30:1 GSR of $66.



TLDR:  There is no point whatsoever in buying gold over silver right now.

TLDR2:  Trust nobody, especially some greaseball with a pinky ring named Martin Armstrong



771. Post 17152621 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: savetherainforest on December 10, 2016, 07:25:13 PM
r0ach is legendary now? Abandon ship   Cheesy


I find him entertaining...  Cheesy Cheesy ...  When the 5th Reich emerges, he will probably have his own battalion. So... I guess you should get in his good graces today and cash in your investment when the day comes!  Roll Eyes




772. Post 17153328 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on December 11, 2016, 08:03:15 PM
I bought thousands of pounds worth of silver when it was at $30.



What a dickhead

I bought all mine under $20, but even the big names in silver like David Morgan and Mike Maloney have bought silver at much higher prices than now.  People like Mike Maloney have bought at $5, but they also bought at $30.  David Morgan also has $30 silver.  In the end you will still do well if you're patient because the price of metals is going astronomically high when the debt markets implode.



773. Post 17153428 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

It's also plain as day to see what's going on with metals.  You HAVE to rig the price of metals in order to try and force NIRP/ZIRP on people, and that's exactly what they've done, manipulated them down even lower than their already manipulated low prices.  They're currently on sale for like 30-40% off their usual manipulation state:



The fact they would attempt this manipulation going even further than the normal manipulation indicates we are in the endgame and they aren't worried about having to make good on any paper promises or claims on unallocated gold with 100 or more owners for every 1 bar.



774. Post 17159740 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: julian071 on December 12, 2016, 11:57:07 AM
This is going to be a very unproductive day for me. At my day job, that is.

Speculating Americans don't like to wake up early, but we have to, so we do it slowly.



775. Post 17163010 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

The ticker seems to be malfunctioning and stopped going up.




776. Post 17163700 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on December 12, 2016, 07:51:13 PM
T-48 HOURS FOR A 100% FED INTEREST RATE HIKE, FUEL THE F***ING ROCKET !!![/size]

Raising rates doesn't help Bitcoin.  It doesn't necessarily hurt it either since gold has gone up at the same time rates have many times before.  Loose monetary policy with things like borrowing at zero or negative rates creates malinvestment, which then creates bubbles in speculative assets.  The act of tightening monetary policy theoretically should drain money out of speculative assets.  Depending on who you ask, Bitcoin is either money or a speculative asset, but most people can't even define what the hell it is, which is why it's usually not affected by normal market variables.

The only way raising rates is really beneficial for Bitcoin (since higher rates makes fiat more competitive) is if you bring it to like 3% to create a derivatives meltdown, or crank them all the way up to make the debt unserviceable and force Trump to default or hyperinflate out of it.



777. Post 17163817 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on December 12, 2016, 08:21:07 PM
T-48 HOURS FOR A 100% FED INTEREST RATE HIKE, FUEL THE F***ING ROCKET !!![/size]

Raising rates doesn't help Bitcoin.  It doesn't necessarily hurt it either since gold has gone up at the same time rates have many times before.  Loose monetary policy with things like borrowing at zero or negative rates creates malinvestment, which then creates bubbles in speculative assets.  The act of tightening monetary policy theoretically should drain money out of speculative assets.  Depending on who you ask, Bitcoin is either money or a speculative asset, but most people can't even define what the hell it is, which is why it's usually not affected by normal market variables.

The only way raising rates is really beneficial for Bitcoin (since higher rates makes fiat more competitive) is if you bring it to like 3% to create a derivatives meltdown, or crank them all the way up to make the debt unserviceable and force Trump to default on it.

I agree with what you said R0ach, but don't forget that any raise in the USD will immediately equal to a weakening CNY.

Too many variables to address there since you have to posit China makes up the majority of the BTC buyer's market and anytime they perform such arbitrage action that there's a buyer for the coins they inflate to a higher price in the process.  I mean, it all sounds good on paper, but let's say China devalues by 30% in one swoop tomorrow and insider traders buy a bunch of BTC today.  For their trade to function, someone else on the planet has to be willing to buy BTC at 30% higher prices or the price comes back down again.  So it's less of a sure thing and more like a game of do the Chinese feel lucky today?



778. Post 17170272 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Vahnt on December 13, 2016, 03:45:57 AM
Lol what a joke.

The moves on Huobi never fail to perplex me.

Let's ask the #1 market analyst in the world:

Quote from: MatTheCat on November 14, 2015, 11:05:59 PM
This Bullshit aint the work of an aggregate market.

Quote from: MatTheCat on November 14, 2015, 11:05:59 PM
This market is fucked.

Quote from: MatTheCat on November 14, 2015, 11:05:59 PM
This is just a few players with the power to defy all time learned principles of market mechanics

Quote from: MatTheCat on November 15, 2015, 02:51:41 PM
the splashes of the whales have frozen me in my tracks

Quote from: MatTheCat on November 15, 2015, 03:41:05 AM
these markets are just not to be traded

Quote from: MatTheCat on November 15, 2015, 02:51:41 PM
I can't reasonably expect to be able to play these markets

Quote from: MatTheCat on April 24, 2016, 08:57:50 PM
this is brain damage of the highest order, and I aint even making money



779. Post 17232800 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: spiderbrain on December 18, 2016, 10:31:41 PM
Yet, all of the anti-semitic hate speech is just fine.
Ha! Oh yes, exactly this =D




780. Post 17260400 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Looks like open highway to $900.  Will have to see if the Jews try to implode it and form a double top in the $1000s or if they want to force people into bitcoin instead of gold and silver and thus allow it to keep going to the moon.  Silver market is not much bigger than bitcoin so at some point they're either coming after bitcoin too, or they'll want everyone in bitcoin instead since it's easier to regulate and tax.

Quote from: r0ach on December 10, 2016, 01:49:11 PM
Lowest it can dump to is $720ish, while the current upside targets are $815 and $900.




781. Post 17261029 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 22, 2016, 06:35:49 AM
850  Cool




782. Post 17280656 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Bitcoin, it's like looking at a picture of Steve Jobs and Bill Gates in the 80's...sort of:




783. Post 17282254 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Patel on December 23, 2016, 11:07:14 PM
Who is buying? That the price would go up like this lately




784. Post 17286784 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: lightfoot on December 24, 2016, 05:43:40 AM
I keep thinking about transferring a chunk of my retirement funds into Bitcoin.

This is the type of stuff you read right before a blow off top involving collapse of financial institutions.




785. Post 17291921 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: tabnloz on December 24, 2016, 10:45:39 PM
For me bitcoin is a store of value outside of govt control.

You'd have to define if there is actually any form of Nash equilibrium or not.  To answer this question, I present to you:

Bitcoin as a function of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1727889.0



786. Post 17331270 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: tonyq on December 28, 2016, 10:48:30 PM
Sold my coins at $500  each.
I feel ill.
 Embarrassed

Bitcoin, master of the shakeout.



787. Post 17331823 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):






788. Post 17352259 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Torque on December 30, 2016, 06:48:38 PM
Reaching $10K vs. staying there are two entirely different things...

Dollar value is kind of irrelevant when you look at the following factors.  Energy output plateaued in 2004 with peak conventional crude oil.  Human labor output has also peaked with every nation that matters reaching a plateau in population for working demographic.  Take into account that debt based currency requires infinite growth or infinite printing and you already have your answer about what's going to happen.

This is where contingency plans come in.  Governments all already know debt based currency has run it's course and have to transition into something to service more of a steady state economy.  They don't want anyone using metals because metals are inherently anti-big government.  They want to be able to fund infinite wars and their pizzagate lifestyle, and it's difficult to steal money from people to do so when ownership is obfuscated and they can't use hidden subterfuge like inflation tax.

Then you have Bitcoin/digital currency.  The goal here is basically for the government to come in and either completely co-opt it, or just act as gatekeepers where they track every dime spent on the planet and come after it all.  They can simply create an alias system wrapper around Bitcoin and mandate everyone has to use it or be considered a felonious money launderer.  The alias system wrapper would probably even directly deduct taxes in addition to whatever else they feel they can take from you to fund Marxism.

Overall, Kaczynsky was generally right about everything and we are probably fucked if digital currency wins over metals, but you might make some money along the way before transitioning into full dystopia.  Silver has around the same upside potential as Bitcoin, so if you could invest then play god and pick the winner to replace debt based fiat, it would be a hard sell picking anything but silver when the other options have all these potential dystopian 1984 features.

I am hedged for both outcomes so you can't call me biased.  I'm just 100% positive that no matter how "good" any digital currency starts out as, these malevolent entities in the world (aka the Jews) are going to turn it into a dystopia just like their current debt based system when there are so many angles for them to do so as I mentioned above.  They honestly seem to not only have no fear of Bitcoin, they have people like Larry Summers and Bernanke embracing it, while mentioning the word silver makes their hair stand up and face turn white like vampires being exposed to sunlight.

Their Marxist banking cabal/cult follows a literal interpretation of some made up book called the Torah and believe every Jew is entitled to 800 "goyim" slaves:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCLtAbULUtw

Whatever scam they try to implement to replace the current system doesn't matter.  Too many "goyim" know what's going on now and we'll be coming for them in the end regardless.








789. Post 17358418 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

This thread is going downhill with people posting random dollar values or "bitcoin moon" slogans with no fundamental or technical reasoning behind them.  If you're going to say the price is going to be X, at least post a chart or reason why you think it's going to do so.  

For instance, I think it's possible Bitcoin could hit $10k-20k each in current state, but anything higher than that and you'd probably be running into things like $10 - $100 transaction fees and start to severely limit it's use cases.  At that point I think you'd either need things like financial institutions themselves to adopt it as part of infrastructure, or you'd need something like Lightning Network or a larger block size to go further.

For the Lightning Network, there's a lot of unanswered questions with things like routing and garbage collection (closing out channels).  If a bunch of people close out channels simultaneously through either normal usage or an attack and overflow the 1.6 MB block size, it kind of throws a wrench in things there.  The price to close channels would probably be set artificially high to try and avoid situations like this and create an ever increasing bid war where everyone is bid off of the main chain quickly and forced onto LN to do anything for all intents and purposes, so it's kind of important what pros and cons it has over current Bitcoin if you're going to be forced to use it.  

Nobody really knows how all these variables will play out yet.

TLDR:  Bitcoin is probably good for another 10x in current state but might need more throughput to go further, or for financial institutions to adopt it and use it in place of something like the SWIFT network.  Otherwise it would probably hit $10k-20k then new capital might all bleed off into something like Litecoin.



790. Post 17358849 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on December 31, 2016, 08:19:46 PM
This thread is going downhill with people posting random dollar values or "bitcoin moon" slogans with no fundamental or technical reasoning behind them.  If you're going to say the price is going to be X, at least post a chart or reason why you think it's going to do so.  

For instance, I think it's possible Bitcoin could hit $10-20k each in current state, but anything higher than that and you'd probably be running into things like $20 - $100 transaction fees and start to severely limit it's use cases.  At that point I think you'd either need things like financial institutions themselves to adopt it as part of infrastructure, or you'd need something like Lightning Network or a larger block size to go further.

For the Lightning Network, there's a lot of unanswered questions with things like routing and garbage collection (closing out channels).  If a bunch of people close out channels simultaneously through either normal usage or an attack and overflow the 1.6 MB block size, it kind of throws a wrench in things there.  The price to close channels would probably be set artificially high to try and avoid situations like this and create an ever increasing bid war where everyone is bid off of the main chain quickly and forced onto LN to do anything for all intents and purposes, so it's kind of important what pros and cons it has over current Bitcoin if you're going to be forced to use it.  

Nobody really knows how all these variables will play out yet.

TLDR:  Bitcoin is probably good for another 10x in current state but might need more throughput to go further, or for financial institutions to adopt it and use it in place of something like the SWIFT network.  Otherwise it would probably hit $10-20k then new capital might all bleed off into something like Litecoin.


How much does it cost to send $100 dollars worth of bitcoin today vs. $100 worth of Bitcoin in July of 2013? Isn't the tx fee 0.0001 BTC/kB?

Also 0.0001 * $20,000 = $2 not.... $20

I'm kind of making the assumption here that the price will eventually have to be backed by actual, somewhat inelastic commerce instead of speculation to sit at and maintain a high price.  At a price of say $10-20k, a lot of speculators are going to say, "Ok, this looks like a good place to bail out for me", then they start to sell half or more.  You then require a number of buyers greater than one on average to come in and replace the position of that one whale who held a windfall profit position.  

In other words, price growth backed by actual commerce usage instead of branching from one speculator to two speculators, to four speculators, etc.  Somewhere along the line the utility of the system overrides speculation for price and one of the main variables that determines utility is the transaction fee.  When you extrapolate further with this reasoning and notice there is no way Bitcoin resides lower on Exter's pyramid than gold and silver, you will see the ability to do frictionless commerce at scale becomes a lot more important than trying to pretend to be a store of value when it can't actually compete with metals in that regard.  

Only a complete fool is going to try and claim Bitcoin is more "anti-fragile" than metals that took two neutron stars to create.  This is why the transaction fee or throughput starts to become a big indicator of possible market cap.  If the price exploded to say $100k, yet transaction fees did not also skyrocket with it and maintain that level, it just means it would be in a bubble that's going to collapse because you're still in a speculation scenario and nobody is actually using it for anything.



791. Post 17360309 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Torque on January 01, 2017, 12:09:44 AM
Only a complete fool is going to try and claim Bitcoin is more "anti-fragile" than metals that took two neutron stars to create.

Ok, WRT precious metals (like Gold), please think of this:

1)  PM derivatives market has driven up speculative price of Gold many orders of magnitude above any sensible speculative value based on Average Joe supply/demand, and far beyond any intrinsic value

2)  Any new large Gold deposits discoveries over the last 50+ years (which could be massive!) would *never* be disclosed to the public

3) No transparency in Gold holdings (i.e., vaults, federal reserves, bank reserves, personal holdings, etc.) so no feasible way to definitively audit.  Much of the Gold supposedly backing federal and bank reserves could be completely a myth, or at least a tiny fraction of what is reported to be held.

4) Gold easily faked with Tungsten

And you want to say PMs like Gold are anti-fragile???

#1 - The Crimex only has to account for physical delivery of around 1-2% of it's order books per month, which along with the ETFs is how they manage to fractional reserve metals.  Meaning everything in the paper markets is used to depress the price, NOT increase it.  Unallocated gold has no value.  It's like storing your Bitcoin on MtGox and having Mark Karpeles sell it while you're not looking.

#2 - The earth is for all intents and purposes a closed ecosystem.  We already know in general how much is out there.

#3 - Which is why the statement exists "If you don't hold it you don't own it" and is the same for Bitcoin.

#4 - There's plenty of easy methods to detect fakes, especially for coins where the dimensions have to match as well as weight and maker's marks

Anyway, let's not even get into the fact that through all of history paper currency has been a derivative of metals, NOT paper competing with metals.  Paper represents nothing.  Bitcoin is competing against metals, not the USD.  As for upside, silver has far higher upside potential than gold.



792. Post 17364800 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

The JIDF really doesn't want this going over $1000.  China's quota on how much money they can send overseas reset on January 1st, so I doubt anyone is stopping this from going higher.




793. Post 17365632 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Master mind on January 01, 2017, 07:14:43 PM
When start legendary shill accounts fud and dump coins ?




794. Post 17365723 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: r0ach on January 01, 2017, 07:38:28 PM
When start legendary shill accounts fud and dump coins ?






795. Post 17367885 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

The r0ach report vol 5 released.  I cover the whole FOA "freegold" theory vs bitcoin vs silver:

http://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/if-there-s-any-plausible-conspiracy-involving-silver-and-bitcoin-this-is-it

There's a lot of stuff in there I'm sure many people here are not aware of in terms of monetary reset and ramifications.  

It will be interesting to see what other people think about my gold/silver/bitcoin allocation tables.




796. Post 17369024 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Dafar on January 02, 2017, 05:27:11 AM
$3K per BTC by end of 2017 or bust.... Sad













797. Post 17376629 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 02, 2017, 06:22:34 AM
It will be interesting to see what other people think about my gold/silver/bitcoin allocation tables.

Quote
I've always thought the FOA idea of revaluing gold at $55,000 was kind of absurd since India and the Arabs have so much of it. The west would just be transferring power to 3rd world nations.

If official figures are to be believed, then the US is actually in good shape with regards to your scenario.

I've been collating figures over the last several years:
All monetary gold: 33000 tonnes
Us has actually 8133 tonnes
ECB  10788
Russia 1500*
China admits to 1823 tonnes (probably around 4000 total)
UK 310 tons left
IMF 2800 tonnes

Figures are pretty sloppy, but from rough order of magnitude, the current monetary powers seem to roughly match gold holdings.

Of course, nobody has seen inside Fort Knox for decades...

The Indian government has only 600 tons, but the Indian public has....over 20,000 tons.  Canada has basically zero gold, and their citizens also probably have little.  So the FOA argument of revaluing gold to some astronomical number would definitely be transferring HUGE power from the 1st world to the 3rd world in a lot of ways.  This is why I don't really see a gold hegemony as benefiting anyone that would actually be pulling the trigger on making it happen.  

If that actually happened, the R-selection giant mass of people in India would then all be rich and go from 1 billion to 4 billion people while the US and other nations have to export all their resources to them.  Nobody at round table groups like the CFR wants to see a scenario like that of mass overpopulation and making India king of the world.  A lot of people claim that since CBs hoard gold, that they will force gold hegemony in a monetary reset/recapitalization, but it just doesn't make sense in practice.

If they went for a bimetallism approach, nobody actually owns large amounts of silver, and they could just acquire it for cheap to dilute the power of places like India's gold holdings if they were forced to use metals for recapitalization.  It appears both JP Morgan (possibly acting as an agent of the govt) + China are currently acquiring huge amounts of silver as I talked about here:

https://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/if-there-s-any-plausible-conspiracy-involving-silver-and-bitcoin-this-is-it

It's also possible Bitcoin was released to accomplish this goal due to the problems of them recapitalizing using metals.  The point is, to avoid a new dark ages, they will have to do some type of recapitalization event in a monetary reset that extinguishes debt, and the only real choices at play involve gold, silver, or bitcoin being used in some manner.  Bitcoin doesn't seem quite uh, realistic to have the entire world monetary system run on it, but it's definitely one of those backup to a backup plan options.  Metals seem like a much more realistic option, but they would either have to take all of India and random Arab nation's gold or go the bimetallism option I spoke of.



798. Post 17377635 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: BitcoinNewsMagazine on January 02, 2017, 11:23:33 PM
Clif High is the same oddball prognosticator who predicted nuclear war in 2010. You may as well get investment advice from Rush Limbaugh. Take a look at his website at halfpasthuman.com.

You forgot the part where he believes the government has captured UFOs and reverse engineers them while creating a breakaway civilization...

He does get some other things right though.



799. Post 17377650 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: eddie13 on January 03, 2017, 12:34:01 AM
Winning

Windows 10, definitely losing.



800. Post 17377779 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on January 02, 2017, 10:53:00 PM
MUST WATCH FOR EVERY CRYPTO ENTHUSIAST WHO WANTS TO KNOW WHERE BITCOIN IS HEADING IN 2017
News URL : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVAI07f-5M0

Just skimmed through it.  He predicts $600/oz silver in 2017, heh.  Didn't see his BTC estimate, just said "higher".


Quote from: r0ach on December 10, 2016, 01:49:11 PM




801. Post 17378331 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: savetherainforest on January 03, 2017, 02:22:37 AM
MUST WATCH FOR EVERY CRYPTO ENTHUSIAST WHO WANTS TO KNOW WHERE BITCOIN IS HEADING IN 2017
News URL : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVAI07f-5M0

Just skimmed through it.  He predicts $600/oz silver in 2017, heh.  Didn't see his BTC estimate, just said "higher".


He said BTCiTcoin would be "80808" in dollars or yuan! But not exactly with a specific timeline. And he also said gold will be 20.000$ when the DOW will be 120k (120.000)


Looks like he stole my numbers for monetary reset.  Same value for gold, same value for silver, and same value for Bitcoin because I said Bitcoin will likely get stuck in the $10k-$20k range without either widespread usage and deployment of LN or a block size increase.  So that would be around a 17x for gold, 10x for BTC, and 38x for silver.  Bitcoin will perform better as an "emerging technology" until that event occurs, though.



802. Post 17378364 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 03, 2017, 02:23:22 AM
Someone just dumbed 700 BTC on stamp to force the price from $1023 to $999

Someone you say?





803. Post 17390294 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: 2017Bubble on January 04, 2017, 05:31:14 AM
ATH or single digits?

The bankers decided to let us pump Bitcoin to the moon to acclimate people to their cashless society prison until they figure out that most people are spending the profits on things like gold and silver.




804. Post 17409968 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

I don't usually post dump calls as a courtesy to fellow market makers/china pumpers, but it was pretty much over at this picture I sent to someone yesterday:




Support levels are $923, $965, and $1006.  I assume most of the dump ammo is gone and it will probably hold around $965 then gradually move back to $1015-$1020 range over time.



805. Post 17413957 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: kurious on January 05, 2017, 10:31:48 PM
Chicken bones say anything can happen.

Chicken bone has decided next stop:

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1279383.0



806. Post 17414384 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 06, 2017, 01:13:08 AM
FUD, etc




807. Post 17429439 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on January 07, 2017, 10:21:33 AM


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdQY7BusJNU






808. Post 17437171 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: notme on January 08, 2017, 06:29:36 AM
Definitely.  The question is... bulltrap or beartrap?

Doesn't matter.

Why you should convert all of your assets out of the banking system whether it be gold, silver, or bitcoin:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg17437091#msg17437091



809. Post 17444371 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: K~Ehleyr on January 08, 2017, 05:11:33 PM
Oh crappy-o, it looks like we're going down

Chart says up




810. Post 17445601 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 08, 2017, 10:45:04 PM
I remain convinced that Bitcoin is a long-term successful moonshot.

Yea, that's the problem.  The only way Bitcoin can be a guaranteed moonshot is if the plan of governments is to allow it to grow then co-opt it after and turn it into their cashless society slave system.  They'll create a fixed address, alias system wrapper with your name tag on it to go around Bitcoin and force you to use it or you'll be considered a criminal launderer.  We've already seen hints of this action with things like chain anchor.

Chain anchor was the direct approach and it failed (so far).  Next they'll figure out they don't actually have to modify the Bitcoin client and can just make their own that wraps around Bitcoin and legally force you to use it.  They will then wait until the majority of the population is herded into the system and then use the wrap around client to divorce themselves away from a finite, native Bitcoin unit and just turn it into the same fiat system that already exists except with the added bonus of cash being abolished and all transactions are tracked with your money automatically being stolen or redistributed to wherever they want.

They're already floating this propaganda now that with the "rise of robotics" causing unemployment, a Marxist slave system run by technocrats is required for humans to exist.  The only type of functional collectivist systems to ever exist are ones where people share the same genes like in a family unit or as seen in prisons where people form a bloc for common interests.  Tossing the mass of humanity into a big Marxist system always ends in collapse and mass death.

Don't get me wrong, you will probably be able to make some money on the ride towards this obvious endgame, but I give odds of around 10% that cryptocurrency turns out good in some way for humanity, and 90% chance it ends in the above dystopian scenario, co-opted by government and run by a bunch of people with the last name Goldstein.

I own gold, silver, and Bitcoin, and every time I see Bitcoin go up, it makes me equally happy for increasing purchasing power, and frightened since I already know what the most likely outcome is.



811. Post 17445710 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 09, 2017, 12:09:47 AM
I remain convinced that Bitcoin is a long-term successful moonshot.

Yea, that's the problem.  The only way Bitcoin can be a guaranteed moonshot is if the plan of governments is to allow it to grow then co-opt it after and turn it into their cashless society slave system.  They'll create a fixed address, alias system wrapper with your name tag on it to go around Bitcoin and force you to use it or you'll be considered a criminal launderer.  We've already seen hints of this action with things like chain anchor.

Chain anchor was the direct approach and it failed (so far).  Next they'll figure out they don't actually have to modify the Bitcoin client and can just make their own that wraps around Bitcoin and legally force you to use it.  They will then wait until the majority of the population is herded into the system and then use the wrap around client to divorce themselves away from a finite, native Bitcoin unit and just turn it into the same fiat system that already exists except with the added bonus of cash being abolished and all transactions are tracked with your money automatically being stolen or redistributed to wherever they want.

They're already floating this propaganda now that with the "rise of robotics" causing unemployment, a Marxist slave system run by technocrats is required for humans to exist.  The only type of functional collectivist systems to ever exist are ones where people share the same genes like in a family unit or as seen in prisons where people form a bloc for common interests.  Tossing the mass of humanity into a big Marxist system always ends in collapse and mass death.

Don't get me wrong, you will probably be able to make some money on the ride towards this obvious endgame, but I give odds of around 10% that cryptocurrency turns out good in some way for humanity, and 90% chance it ends in the above dystopian scenario, co-opted by government and run by a bunch of people with the last name Goldstein.

I own gold, silver, and Bitcoin, and every time I see Bitcoin go up, it makes me equally happy and frightened since I already know what the most likely outcome is.

buy or die

Already up to my eyeballs in coins.  I just think the danger of a digital only currency is higher than possible benefits, so if playing god, I would likely just destroy it and institute physical silver and gold as the currency.  It seems people want to go through the motions and see what happens with this digital currency thing even though it's pretty obvious what's going to happen.  The only way it's not going to happen is if the government magically ceases to exist before they co-opt it, which is possible but not very likely.  The legal system and men with guns always trumps whatever you're doing with this stuff.  

So you then need to examine the applicability of utilizing Bitcoin only in a black market context compared to using metals in the same situation.  It did work on the silk road in the past, but that did not afford it a high market cap and the government would likely clamp down on it at the ISP level or something to prevent it from being anything more.  Meanwhile, it's very difficult for them to stop use of metals no matter what the law is.  So, as I was saying, the easiest way for you to maximize profit in Bitcoin is to hope that it is a government trojan horse, otherwise it will be a rough trip and no "guaranteed moonshot".



812. Post 17446381 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 09, 2017, 12:43:03 AM
Meanwhile, it's very difficult for them to stop use of metals no matter what the law is.
What attribute do you believe monetary metals possess that is not possessed by cryptocurrencies? From my understanding, crypto is the better bet. After all, we can hide an unlimited amount of it in secure fashion.

The best bet in the long run is determined by whatever you believe makes up the base of Exter's pyramid:



I personally don't see bitcoin occupying the same bottom slot as monetary metals so it would have to be one higher on the same level as fiat.  We live in a closed ecosystem and the blockchain for metals was created by two neutron stars colliding, so unless you can replicate that, it's not very easy to tamper with the metals blockchain.  People spam the word "anti-fragile" for Bitcoin, but it's just not in the same category of security as requiring two neutron stars to alter.  As you can see, Exter's pyramid is mostly a scale of real anti-fragility.

People like Bitcoin because they look at it as a free money tree of upward growth.  Assuming the market cap had topped out on both metals and bitcoin and you were forced to go all-in on one, which one are you going to pick?  The aggregate market will likely gravitate towards the most anti-fragile solution in that case if the upside is tapped out.  The only reason people hold Bitcoin instead is because they believe it can have higher yield in the short term as a speculative instrument.

Since less than 1% of people own metals, and even less own Bitcoin, they both have a lot of speculative upside.  It's all about measuring the risk and upside vs one another.  Metals do have huge upside of probably around $5000-$20,000 for an ounce of gold and $166-$1333 for an ounce of silver in current purchasing power.  This would be an average of a +10.6x for gold and +45x for silver.  This means Bitcoin needs to have greater than a 10-45x upside ($8840 - $39,600 per coin) for you to consider it since the risk is higher.

To flatten out some of the noise here, let's assume partipants are 50/50 gold silver split and give you a +27.5x gain.  In that case, Bitcoin would need to have upside potential of $24,200 per coin to be worth holding as a long term investment and not day trading (as of market prices today).  Without Lightning network or a block size increase, I think Bitcoin might get stuck in the $10k-20k range.  So you have these two variables in bitcoin throwing a big monkey wrench into what potential price can be.

Anyway, as you can see from my numbers, it is difficult to advocate a 100% all-in position on Bitcoin with 0 metals even if you are a crazed gambler seeking maximum yield.  If you fall in that category of seeking max yield while still having some type of safety, you would likely be something like 50% metals 50% bitcoin at most, or even 70% metals 30% bitcoin due to the risks involved.  (Notice I did say you need to be a crazed gambler to have 30-50% of your money in Bitcoin).



813. Post 17446519 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Torque on January 09, 2017, 02:38:25 AM
Absolute floor at end of this week is 830. Floor somewhere around 860 in 2-3 months. Floor = 900 in 4-5 months.

Buy if price gets anywhere that close.

4-5 months?  Trump goes in office in a few days.  I wouldn't be surprised to see some type of large scale economic events that affect price one way or another sooner.



814. Post 17447284 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 09, 2017, 03:59:55 AM
In my mind, metals and crypto are peers in the next layer up. As neither are an abstraction of anything other than the societal belief in the concept of money.

Exter's pyramid is mostly a concept of money seeking safety, so like I said, the anti-fragile nature of an asset plays a big part there and not just "belief" that it is money.  One of bitcoin's largest weaknesses is the rough consensus attack (as seen demonstrated on Ethereum), so that undermines the concept that just belief it is money is good enough when you create multiple targets people have to believe in with no way of convergence.


Quote from: jbreher on January 09, 2017, 03:59:55 AM
Right now, at that layer, metals occupy a 99.8% wedge, with crypto making up the adjacent 0.2% sliver -- but growing quickly ( on a scale encompassing decades).

This is actually not true in the context that the silver market cap is barely bigger than Bitcoin.  You talked about belief in an object being money is important.  Well, it's not that easy.  Out of all the noble metals that exist, the only ones suited to be used as currency are gold and silver.  There is no infinite, arbitrary selection to choose from for various reasons.  This is the reason silver has such huge upside, maybe even higher than Bitcoin, because the bankers attempted to suppress the only other viable option besides gold for hundreds of years while they tried to corner gold instead.  If gold is re-monetized in any meaningful way either by central bankers themselves or by the free market, then the manipulation on silver also breaks with the type of gains you only see once in a lifetime.


Quote from: jbreher on January 09, 2017, 03:59:55 AM
Even if you don't envision crypto at the same layer as metals, why need it occupy the same layer as fiat? Fiat is -- or at least was until 1913, 1933, or 1964 however you want to think of it -- an abstraction of metals. Crypto was never such.

Well, Bitcoin is obviously an attempt to recreate gold, except for the fact that "proof of work" done to mine gold always gives you a fungible result between participants, while due to the rough consensus attack, there is no way to converge upon what is and isn't bitcoin.  The only real way for it to function is to be released in a finished state and never fork so the proof of work is always cumulative instead of branching off into the equivalent of alternate universes.  


Quote from: jbreher on January 09, 2017, 03:59:55 AM
If you want to go universal, you don't get to do so without the observation that the current supply of monetary metals is infinitesimally small in relation to those we will have access to in the future. OTOH, Bitcoin supply is fixed*.

I'm sure the people in Rome thought they would be mining asteroids for gold too right before the dark ages came.  Anyway, humans are a long way off from living in an open ecosystem instead of a closed one, if ever, so it's not really worth discussing at this point.



815. Post 17456829 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 10, 2017, 03:52:47 AM
I dont understand these bears....




816. Post 17479318 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on January 11, 2017, 06:44:44 PM
Wow, I ate a big bag of shit today. Got wiped out.  I guess that's what you get when you get overconfident.

Looks like a MatTheMat quote.


Quote from: MatTheCat on January 24, 2016, 08:54:17 PM
Fucking rat cocksuckers. 6 fucking BTC trade with Stop Order

Quote from: MatTheCat on June 15, 2016, 07:50:57 PM
I am a loser trader, and I make terrible decisions.  Overall, I have given more to the Bitcoin market than I have taken from it.

Quote from: MatTheCat on February 20, 2016, 08:01:54 PM
I now hold ZERO Bitcoins



817. Post 17490483 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: savetherainforest on January 12, 2017, 12:30:47 PM
chinese went full retarded

This is the explanation for anything that happens in Bitcoin whether it's up, down, or sideways.



818. Post 17490664 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 13, 2017, 07:36:39 AM
I suspect the PBOC will find evidence of fake humans, trading on huobi.

Or a Huobi exchange doesn't even exist and it was just a price feed originating from Karpeles' laptop.



819. Post 17499735 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 13, 2017, 09:05:24 AM
What do I mean? India was about 80% cash. Why would the people not just reply with 'fuck you - we'll just keep using these notes the same way we have been'. Nothing changes. 80% of all transactions continue being done in cash -- not recognized by the gubmint, but who the fuck gives a shit -- and Modi ( and his wall street financiers) get to stew over in the corner. I mean really -- for the people, what is the downside?

Because it fails in game theory exercise when you have an unorganized mass of people with no "Schelling point" of convergence.  In other words, the value of the fiat is derived solely from government "backing", yet the government just "unbacked" the currency to worthlessness.  This means you could never have more than a small, illogical minority group coming together with that as a solution.  Gold and silver on the other hand derive value irrespective of government, so the Schelling point in these types of situations is always going to be a mad dash to metals instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_point_(game_theory)




820. Post 17508786 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 14, 2017, 01:49:42 PM
atm the divide between miners and devs are based on insults and broken promises. the code is out, but 3/4 of miners won't run it. what's the way forward?

You did not compose much of a valid question since you never cited any type of goal or endgame in the first place.  If you do the math, you will come to the conclusion that Bitcoin needs around 50 TPS (8 MB + Schnorr sigs) to have any type of market penetration in the upper middle class of the world with current population levels (assuming LN doesn't work out).  But, that's the problem - even if you achieve that level, people will demand it have 1000 TPS instead, and so on - never ending goals.  

This means Bitcoin will always be nothing but a centrally controlled technocracy in the end if people are allowed to say it's never finished and always has to have a team of their choosing control it.  Either this thing can be Grovers/Shors quantum computing proofed and then unleashed with nobody working on it, or there is no point in it's existence.  Meaning, Bitcoin has to have some type of endgame or that's an attack vector in itself to be controlled by technocrats.

To me, that endgame is either 8 MB + Schnorr signatures, or if it actually functions right (which I'm not convinced it will) LN + whatever is required to prevent an apocalypse from everyone closing channels at once (which nobody seems to have any damn clue of how to solve that problem).  It seems like to me that transactions would have to be queued in an orderly line to prevent it, and then you're back to square one of not having solved any problem without centralization.



821. Post 17517188 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 15, 2017, 09:30:02 PM
you guys are so bearish.

In the situation I describe below where there's a continuously decreasing amount of goods and services (perma-deleveraging), I think metals are the biggest winner since they have the least amount of counterparty risk.  But, bitcorn would probably see some benefit too even though Bitcoin has FAR HIGHER counterparty risk than people claim:


Quote from: r0ach on January 15, 2017, 11:18:57 PM
When complex systems collapse, they devolve into simpler ones.  They never jump into a higher tier of complexity.  Complex systems also tend to require exponential resource (energy) curves.  Peak conventional crude oil already happened in 2004.  Peak working age demographic already occurred in every nation that matters.

Wealth comes from people doing work in the real world, not shuffling around papers.  That work is either done from things like burning fuel to do the work for you, or humans physically doing it themselves.  With both working age demographic and energy output declining, people will be spending more time and effort doing work for the basic necessities and nobody is going to be overpaying people for shuffling numbers on a computer unless it involves something to do with solving the energy problem.

"Excess" energy is why a day's wage in Rome was a small amount of silver and why it's a larger amount of silver now.  Instead of humans having to dig it up, the work was being done for free by machines, thus devaluing it's worth.  But, the time of arbitraging "free" energy into depleting all resources like metals as fast as possible is over now (that and the fact peak metals is occurring regardless the state of energy).  Unless fusion power solves all these problems (not likely because fusion is actually low EROI), then we already hit peak energy, peak cheap metals, peak cheap food, and this energy arbitrage scheme is ending, possibly in a Seneca cliff.



Here's one example of such a chart.  Remember that all wealth is based on energy output since abundance is really just machines burning fossil fuels to do work for you instead of you doing it.  In the gas sector, the high energy yielding conventional stuff is all cratering, so all they did was grab more of the lower return on investment stuff to try and compensate (same thing in the oil market).  So, as this cycle continues, your civilization's wealth continues to decrease until you get to the point of borderline thermodynamic collapse if it uses as much energy to drive the shale oil to market as it does to extract it (and shale is low return on investment).

So, I hate to rain on your parade, but there is no so called knowledge age unless there's some type of enormous energy breakthrough.  Russian govt energy analysts see things getting really bad by around 2020 and say there is no technological solution in sight.  There is no coming out on the other side of the monetary reset with some type of "utopia".  In fact, one of the reasons it's currently crashing is because it relies on infinite growth and the energy situation prevents that.



822. Post 17519172 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: tabnloz on January 16, 2017, 06:18:26 AM
Man, if we go 10x from here..... there are going to be some happy & retired relaxed people

How is it gonna go up 10x while we're all sitting here with our dicks in our hands waiting for daily China bans?  I don't really expect any big moves in a climate like this.  I'm not "bearish", I'm just not expecting some renegade Chinaman to go pump up a $200 spread right now.



823. Post 17527524 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Torque on January 17, 2017, 01:10:37 AM
Honestly, I'm not sure if any really knows what these banks plan to do




824. Post 17559560 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: coins101 on January 19, 2017, 08:54:09 PM
Whose got control of adamstgBit account and is censoring around here?

No idea but you have people that don't even know how Bitcoin works typing "Bitcoin is the new gold", then I post that it's not possible for Bitcoin to defeat metals as a store of value on Exter's pyramid and post is insta-deleted.  Posting the simple objective fact that Bitcoin does not make metals obsolete is considered heresy.  This is an economics speculation thread.  Whether Bitcoin can or can't defeat gold or silver's market cap is part of the equation in quantifying price.



825. Post 17559947 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 20, 2017, 12:35:26 AM
Whose got control of adamstgBit account and is censoring around here?

No idea but you have people that don't even know how Bitcoin works typing "Bitcoin is the new gold", then I post that it's not possible for Bitcoin to defeat metals as a store of value on Exter's pyramid and post is insta-deleted.  Posting the simple objective fact that Bitcoin does not make metals obsolete is considered heresy.  This is an economics speculation thread.  Whether Bitcoin can or can't defeat gold or silver's market cap is part of the equation in quantifying price.
fiat beats gold's and silvers and ever other metal's market caps combined.

put that in you pipe and smoke it.

Fiat has always been a derivative of metals, a coupon to exchange for them.  What essentially happened is that the bank defaulted on you and you were left holding the bag if you didn't turn your coupons in beforehand.  Just like everyone who currently owns fiat is holding the bag still.  Fiat can default.  Bitcoin can essentially default if the thing becomes unusable somehow.  Metals can't default because it exists as more than a concept.



826. Post 17570594 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 20, 2017, 08:26:11 PM
trump sees a broken down golf course, hotel, or country.

and then, he makes it gr8 again.





827. Post 17570655 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 20, 2017, 09:02:34 PM
but the dollar will crash and media will blame trump

I don't remember the exact number, but I think it's something like 60-80% of international trade is in USD.  A lot of that is probably from the oil sales and such.  Unless the US prints a lot of money or foreign countries switch to denominating trade in other assets, it's very difficult to bring the value of the USD down in relation to other garbage fiats.  That's the whole catch with being a reserve currency, you're required to export more currency than you bring in (a trade deficit and implosion of domestic manufacturing).

The only way Trump can "make America great again" is to destroy the dollar, China style centralized devaluation, print dollars to infinity with hyperinflation, or some other such tactic.  Some people have theorized US currency would be switched into two different units with a new domestic only dollar.  Such a tactic would likely only help the scumbag jewish bankers implement the SDR to take over the world with the SDR as the unit of account, though.  Then 1st world nations would descend into poverty as slaves of the IMF/BIS.



828. Post 17570814 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 21, 2017, 02:01:19 AM
they aren't the world reserve of dirty fiats which is about to lose its status, to bitcoin.

You gotta stop drinking if you think this is true.  People say platinum and palladium would never be considered as monetary instruments because they're monopolized almost entirely by South Africa and Russia.  The idea that Bitcoin could become the world reserve currency while monopolized by China is honestly a joke.  It's not possible for Bitcoin to defeat gold and silver on Exter's pyramid.  It might have some use somewhere, but it will never be the main unit of account.



829. Post 17570884 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on January 21, 2017, 02:22:49 AM

Unquoted

It sure would be nice to hear something that you came up with other than that regurgitation from Wikipedia. Do you know of anyone else's ideas other than John's?

Please stop getting high on your own supply with your "anyone who doesn't think Bitcoin will be the world reserve currency within 24 hours is wrong" nonsense.  I don't care about people who post some kind of reasoning for why they think the price will go up or down, but when this thread turns into a non-stop stream of moon idiots who post no logical reasoning whatsoever for their calls it gets old.

Contrary to you and Adam's opinion, if the dollar randomly crashed to nothing, everyone and their mom knows metals are going to be the new backbone of the monetary system unless they attempt to try and force their SDR nonsense on people (which would likely fail easily since nobody is buying into a new fiat after the current fiat just imploded).



830. Post 17570979 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on January 21, 2017, 02:39:40 AM
I censor you because people in this thread don't appreciate me quoting a troll.

I'm probably the only non-troll in this entire thread.  My success rate on calls is almost 100%:

Like this picture 4 months ago: 

https://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/bitcoin-market-in-one-picture-without-commentary

Or the thread below: 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1496372.0

Or the MatTheCat thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1442399.msg14930010#msg14930010




831. Post 17571062 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: harrymmmm on January 21, 2017, 02:59:49 AM
hory sheit

China PBoC researching "RMBCoin" with blockchain tech to "truly achieve the goal of money for the people" ("Bi" for "Renmin" as in "RenMinBi")
 
https://twitter.com/cnLedger/status/822617053752422404

30 mins after that tweet btcusd up by +$10 or so.

Looks like people like the idea - or at least the idea that China thinks the cryptocurrency idea is good.

That news isn't even new.  I mean I read yesterday or the day before something from PBOC talking about how they believe cryptocurrency is good but the "emission should be controlled by the state".  So I mean, all they really want to do is make a govt slave coin that has nothing to do with Bitcoin at all.  I'm not even sure how that would be bullish.  If anything, they would probably ban Bitcoin after they make their govt slave coin.  All the stuff I read made it sound more like they want to get rid of Bitcoin and replace it rather than "embrace" it.



832. Post 17571503 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 21, 2017, 03:41:41 AM
trump pop?

Trump's economic policy is essentially "make the yuan strong again" so the US can export, while the Chinamen dump their soon to be appreciating Yuans?



833. Post 17571579 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

It's happening.






http://www.dailystormer.com/nazi-currency-bitcoin-hits-1000-usd-value/




834. Post 17573583 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on January 21, 2017, 09:36:39 AM
Bitcoin is the must have for the rich now. OTC Bitcoin are on the way up: someone at work knows that I hold Bitcoin and they're rapidly turning to me for knowledge and, of course, bitcoins. The followings says it all:
I've been asked to provide 25 BTC. I refused. They were willing to pay more than 20% of current price. I refused.
I've told them to go buy them on the exchanges and do KYC/AML.
I think for the first time in their life they realized what their fiat money real value is and what that's value of financial freedom.

Lol, what?  I'm sorry you couch potatoes, but buying Bitcoin does not give you financial freedom.  Fighting a war with an AR15 against whoever is trying to take your financial freedom is how you get financial freedom.  Just like the days of the revolutionary war, you will probably have to get off your couch at some point.  There is no mouse click shortcut to freedom.  Even metals holders get worried about the government trying to confiscate or legislate against metals in some way.  TPTB can impede the usage of Bitcoin about 5 billion times easier than metals, so you are definitely not getting freedom by smoking some stuff out of a bong and clicking something on Coinbase.



835. Post 17580278 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Miz4r on January 21, 2017, 11:07:33 AM
I think for the first time in their life they realized what their fiat money real value is and what that's value of financial freedom.

Lol, what?  I'm sorry you couch potatoes, but buying Bitcoin does not give you financial freedom.  Fighting a war with an AR15 against whoever is trying to take your financial freedom is how you get financial freedom.  Just like the days of the revolutionary war, you will probably have to get off your couch at some point.  There is no mouse click shortcut to freedom.  Even metals holders get worried about the government trying to confiscate or legislate against metals in some way.  TPTB can impede the usage of Bitcoin about 5 billion times easier than metals, so you are definitely not getting freedom by smoking some stuff out of a bong and clicking something on Coinbase.

You don't understand how disruptive technologies work.

Please, can you not mindlessly repeat Antonopolous slogans like they actually mean something?  Antonopolous is just a salesman or religious evangelist.  The internet isn't some wild west where you can get away with whatever you want.  The state rules the internet and most sectors of the globe are censored already.  There are only two endgames for bitcoin, either the state bans it or co-opts it.  The mining pools are such enormous physical attack vectors that they can shut down Bitcoin just as easily in the physical domain as the digital one even if you were able to magically camouflage all your Bitcoin packets.

So we already know the state can easily wipe out Bitcoin if they want.  The next option is of course co-opting it.  To do this, all they're going to do like I said before, is create a static address, alias system wrapper that goes around Bitcoin and sign laws that you're forced to use it or be considered a criminal launderer.  Then once they have everyone on-boarded, they will divorce the alias system away from the native Bitcoin unit into their regular old fiat system run by the state with the bonus that they were also able to ban cash in the process to totally lock you in their system.

For the 5000th fucking time, Ted Kaczynsky was right and increasing technology always leads to loss of freedom.  There is no way around it whatsoever no matter what your original intention was.  The only way you're getting any freedom is by operating solely in the physical space (transacting in a fungible substance like metals), not digital, because the state never has the resources to monitor every square inch of the earth, but they can easily do so for the digital space!

All you're really doing is making it easier for the state to enslave and destroy you.  Bitcoin came out before the era of them trying to ban cash at every second of the day.  The thing you should be afraid of right now isn't the possibility of a bitcoin ban, it's the fact they aren't trying to ban bitcoin at all!



836. Post 17583011 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Miz4r on January 22, 2017, 01:24:24 AM
If 80% of people say we don't want your private centralized digital currency, we want our p2p decentralized Bitcoin then they won't be able to stop us.

This people power hippy stuff never stopped the state before.  The state will be glad to run over some hippies with tanks.  I think you need to examine how many years they were able to ban private ownership of gold in the US and understand it will always be several orders of magnitude easier to ban or regulate bitcoin out of existence than gold ever was.  

Anyway, I typed up this post for you so you can see the real problem at hand.

Why Bitcoin is currently a roach motel:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1760723.0



837. Post 17592078 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: gembitz on January 22, 2017, 04:12:38 PM
i think people who sensationalize a scalabilty problem should reevaluate the facts !  Cool

This is nonsense.  The only reason you can type such a thing right now is because nobody has been priced out of on-chain transactions yet.  As soon as that happens (which is definitely not far away), that's when bitcoin hits a wall due to what I said here:

Quote from: r0ach on January 22, 2017, 10:04:51 AM
A settlement layer has to compete with or beat gold as a store of value.  Bitcoin cannot accomplish that task so it has to do something else besides being a settlement layer or there is no point!

This is the gorilla in the room.  It turns out Roger Ver is wrong because slightly bigger blocks solves nothing.  Bitcoin would require a full blown LN capacity or it doesn't really have a value proposition.  The only question is, can the LN actually function?  It seems like to me you would have to place all channel closing in a centralized queue, so I have my doubts about LN.  And that is the real fundamental analysis of Bitcoin that most people in this thread either can't comprehend or sort of know there are issues like this but choose to ignore them and hope someone will pump it anyway.

So for bitcoin holders to have any value for their coins would need both miners to adopt segwit and LN to actually work in a decentralized manner, and there is currently no assurance for either one.  Although, I think it's likely they will pass segwit once people figure the conclusion I derive is true.  But then you still need LN to work in a decentralized manner or it's just some obfuscated form of Paypal.  Economy of scale might already cause terminal centralization for the 1st tier bitcoin network in the first place though, by driving the reqs to participate to corporation level.

From a fundamental perspective, people that can actually understand how all these variables interact (which I think are very few) know that in current state bitcoin is relatively broken in terms of long term workability.  The only question is how high can the price go before people figure that out.



838. Post 17595260 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: becoin on January 23, 2017, 01:06:36 PM
bank tokens

I warned you guys for years and people didn't listen.  Bankers are literally shilling in the streets now:

http://www.dailystormer.com/white-men-against-trump-protester-called-out-as-filthy-jew-rat/



839. Post 17606006 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Elwar on January 23, 2017, 05:11:22 PM
Also: Bitcoin is money.

It sounds like semantics, but I would say it's not.  

There's a saying that gold and silver are money and everything else is debt/credit.  This is true.  Fiat can default if your sovereign no longer honors it, like what happened in India with demonetization of bills.  Bitcoin can default if it becomes unusable somehow.  It's not possible for gold or silver to default because it exists as more than a concept.  Yea, the perceived "value" can change, and individual borrowers can default - which is just an obfuscated form of theft - but the system itself doesn't default.



840. Post 17612346 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: gembitz on January 24, 2017, 05:43:53 PM
^of course ~ Mark Kerpeles is free!!!  Cool

MtGox never actually went anywhere...Bitfinex became MtGox:

Quote from: r0ach on January 25, 2017, 12:53:25 AM
I told everyone I know to remove funds from there after Brexit because it appeared someone (probably Finex owners) were naked shorting with infinite money as I talked about here:

https://steemit.com/news/@r0achtheunsavory/bitfinex-is-lying-about-the-hack-and-i-can-tell-you-exactly-what-likely-happened

I even have screenshots still of right when Bitfinex came back online post-goxing.  See anything fishy in this picture?  An insolvent exchange in which nobody is actually going to put money on has all these big staggered walls on the sell side clearly all belonging to one entity (the house).  Bitfinex is an actual bucketshop 100%.



The fact that not Bitstamp or any other exchange passed Finex in volume post-finex collapse and Finex is still leading in volume even with no margin enabled shows how big of a scam the current bitcoin market is.  It's as if whenever a Karpeles Willy bot dies, a new one just pops up on a different exchange to trade with customer funds.  What happened on Finex appears to be no difference whatsoever with what happened on MtGox, yet Finex was somehow not forced out of business while Gox was.




841. Post 17615477 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

First Cliff High, now we have another join in for my price numbers today:

https://srsroccoreport.com/historical-official-data-reveals-golds-value-should-be-20-times-higher/

Quote from: r0ach on December 10, 2016, 01:49:11 PM




842. Post 17624855 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: savetherainforest on January 25, 2017, 08:39:37 PM
I have a strange feeling US will go the way of Gold & Silver. But of course excepting most of the hillbillies, only the West and East coasts from there might be more involved in BTCiTcoinz! Smiley

Gold and silver have nothing to do with being a "hill billy".  For example, if you believe the market cap of bitcoin and metals had both peaked, the only logical game theory move in that circumstance is to dump all the bitcoin for metals since metals are more anti-fragile, more fungible, and less counter party risk.  That is the basis of what defines the lower levels of Exter's pyramid.  If there is no yield to be had, or even negative yield, there is no reason for money to go anywhere besides what is most safe.



843. Post 17637079 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: elebit on January 26, 2017, 12:24:39 PM
What do you people make of this? Will it make Mexicans look for alternative ways for remittances?

http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/25/news/economy/mexico-remittances-trump/




844. Post 17637795 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Meanwhile, the Jews have banned white males from working at banks:

http://www.reddit.com/r/altright/comments/5q3rox/no_straight_while_males_allowed_at_bank_of/

While Trump resurrects Andrew Jackson:

http://www.reddit.com/r/altright/comments/5q5fz7/trump_hangs_portrait_of_andrew_jackson_in_oval/



845. Post 17638653 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Will be interesting to see how this affects bitcoin should it occur:

Quote from: r0ach on January 27, 2017, 09:08:13 AM
Alex Jones claims Trump will release "hidden" DARPA technology:

https://youtu.be/IlzXhH9bwI8?t=1083

I think there is actually probably something to it, since it seems like numerous groups have published data in the past about being able to create 40-90% efficient solar energy collectors, yet here we are still sitting at 20%.



846. Post 17640004 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on January 27, 2017, 11:42:05 AM
It's happening!
Now you're happy or what? Tongue

I'll tell you what's happening, the act of betting a large amount of money on a fight and transferring funds from Coinbase and then having Coinbase threatening saying they're going to delete your account.  The 1984 state of cryptocurrency is here long before you expected it to be.



847. Post 17648629 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: K~Ehleyr on January 27, 2017, 03:32:04 PM
Because Marine Le Pen is a hard-right anti-EU nationalist and her election would probably result in "Frexit" and thereafter the rapid implosion of the European Union and the end of the Euro currency.

http://www.dailystormer.com/france-scandal-may-force-le-pens-top-rival-to-drop-out-of-presidential-race/




848. Post 17664462 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on January 29, 2017, 01:40:23 PM
What could be worth the only thing in the universe that the state cannot take from you?

If the state has the power to take everything from you, I'm not sure how useful a bitcoin brain wallet is gonna be while you're hammering rocks in the gulag.



849. Post 17669453 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 30, 2017, 06:21:22 AM
try to disprove my theory

I can tell you why Roger Ver is wrong below, because bitcoin does not have any real value as a settlement layer and all on-chain scaling will be a settlement layer.  When I talked to the Gavinator before, he also seemed to give the impression he didn't think bitcoin was a store of value either, but he either could not articulate precisely why, or chose not to.  Either way, just like Ver, he seemed to erroneously think on-chain, bigger block scaling could provide some type of fix to this problem when it really doesn't.

Quote from: r0ach on January 30, 2017, 06:22:48 AM
Why bitcoin does not function as a store of value:

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-vol-7-bitcoin-is-not-an-actual-store-of-value-because-there-is-no-real-price-floor-or-inelastic-demand

and

Why bitcoin does not have value as a settlement layer:

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-roach-report-vol-10-why-bitcoin-is-currently-a-roach-motel

The TLDR version is:  

A settlement layer has to compete with or beat gold as a store of value.  Bitcoin cannot accomplish that task so it has to do something else besides being a settlement layer or there is no point.  The only way possible for bitcoin to have any real use is with a lightning network-type solution that vastly increases load capability.  But even then since it doesn't function as a store of value, and the economy of scale forces centralization, I'm not sure what the value proposition will be in holding the coins - if there will be a value proposition or if it will just be like holding Paypal units.

This is all forward looking, long term, endgame analysis here.  Even though it doesn't appear to have a viable endgame without a LN, and questionable value even with one due to not functioning as a store of value and inevitable centralization - who knows, it could go up 10x before people figure that out.



850. Post 17669853 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: sidhujag on January 30, 2017, 06:58:29 AM
There is no gold settlement... bitcoin is the only one. You try to goto fort knox to prove you own a rightful piece of that pie after paying for its claim. Good luck!

Bitcoin as a settlement layer would mean you'd always be dealing with derivatives of bitcoin in order to do day to day transactions that increase it's counter party risk even higher than it is now, and everyone knows bitcoin's counter party risk is already higher than metals in the first place.  There is no situation ever in which bitcoin has less counter party risk than metals, especially when you're using bitcoin derivatives.  

A normal human actually can be their own banker with metals, but with bitcoin there are a million external counter party risk factors that can implode it - like whatever a random bitcoin dev decides to do after waking up in the morning.  Then the fact that if people are going to claim bitcoin is never actually "finished", it's a centralized technocracy by default on the software side and centralized by economy of scale on the mining side.

Can you make money with bitcoin?  Sure.  But don't pretend it's actually solved any problems to make metals obsolete.  Contrary to popular opinion that bitcoin "works" because it's existed for 8 years, this is misleading.  You can start timing the date of whether bitcoin works or not from the point where all micro-transactions are forced off-chain and all on-chain transactions are settlement payments with derivatives of those settlements (such as LN) being used for commerce - with block reward also gone, surviving off transaction fees.

Bitcoin can currently derive price entirely from just being a wild speculative gamble, but the closer you get to the endgame, the more the price will be derived from if the economics and use case makes any sense - and whether economy of scale makes it completely centralized or not.  As I said above, I don't think it has a valid use case as a store of value or settlement layer, so this means it's only hope is LN + vast amounts of transactions and then it's value I guess would be held up by acting as some type of paypal-like processor.

As everybody knows, gold and silver don't really require high transaction flow and turnover, but bitcoin's price is entirely high transaction flow based.  This is why bitcoin as a settlement layer without derivatives of those settlements that are also deemed to be "trustless" has never made any sense.



851. Post 17680123 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: sidhujag on January 30, 2017, 09:59:36 PM
Perhaps at $10000 you will consider it a store of value rather than a processor.

You're just being irrationally biased now.  Everyone knows metals are more fungible, more anti-fragile, and less counter party risk.  This means Bitcoin can never dethrone metals as a store of value or hope to compete with them on Exter's pyramid.  If you're acting as a settlement layer, you're attempting to compete with metals as a store of value and Bitcoin CANNOT do it.  This means Bitcoin has to derive value more from raw transaction flow and being a payment processor instead.  

This is why I think Bitcoin probably doesn't have a value proposition without large scaling.  The lightning network claims to be able to do that, but I'm not convinced it can do so in a decentralized manner when economy of scale already forces centralization in the base bitcoin network in the first place.  Bitcoin did not "solve" the decentralization problem.   Bitcoin is a centralization problem waiting for someone to solve it.

As for solving that centralization problem, to do so you would likely need to engineer it so it's impossible to practice usury in bitcoin.  The only way I can think of to do that is either unprofitable PoW (which probably can't work in practice), or by some really exotic system of decentralized captchas where anyone attempting to solve blocks requires manual human intervention and can't be automated on cruise control via CPUs as I talked about in the thread below.

You cannot have decentralization without engineering bitcoin so automated usury is impossible

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1700073.0

Whether you believe "god" is a person, quantum fluctuation, whatever, metals are a blockchain created by "god"; bitcoin is a blockchain created by people.  The blockchain created by people can never compete because it will always have more flaws or side channel attacks that render it useless.  I have a feeling anything blockchain related will forever be a Rube Goldberg machine that claims to accomplish some type of task, but in reality fails to accomplish that task (decentralization) while doing it an extremely complicated manner.



852. Post 17686939 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 31, 2017, 06:04:41 AM
point me to the central authority which governs bitcoin TX, or stfu.

Point you to the central authority?  Probably the same central authority that shut down Liberty Reserve:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Reserve

Do you really think bitcoin transcends all form of national govt?  I told you exactly what's going to happen already.  The government will create a fixed address alias system wrapper that goes around bitcoin and force you to use it or be considered a criminal launderer, similar to how they tried with chain anchor already.  After everyone is onboarded, they will then divorce the system away from the native bitcoin unit and into their own "government coin" where they can automatically pillage any money they want.  It also helps them ban cash in the process.

This is why you see them going nuts trying to suppress metals at all costs while they don't care at all if bitcoin goes up.  They want you to use bitcoin because they know how easy it is for them to co-opt it or ban it.  When you use Coinbase right now they threaten to delete your account for sending bitcoin to a gambling site.  They track where all the money goes.  Not using Coinbase doesn't help.  Bitcoin isn't fungible while also being totally traced and monitored, so that kind of police state is going to happen no matter how and where you attempt to use bitcoin.  

I kinda figured being completely traceable bitcoin would have that type of fate someday in the future but I thought it would be years from now.  In reality, the bitcoin police state is already here.  Mixing in the future will also be a crime known as "laundering".  I'm aware nobody in this thread actually cares about anything besides trying to make money in pump and dumps, but Ted Kaczynski was right and increasing implementation of technology always leads to loss of freedom.  If you actually wanted freedom you would be using metals.



853. Post 17687114 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Ibian on January 31, 2017, 06:44:29 PM
Do you really think bitcoin transcends all form of national govt?
Yes. We have been over this literally years ago. Why try to reopen closed topics?

Yea, no.

November 7, 2008: "Yes, [we will not find a solution to political problems in cryptography,] but we can win a major battle in the arms race and gain a new territory of freedom for several years" - Satoshi

Notice it says "several years" and not decades or "forever" and that was already 8 years ago.

It's really a binary outcome.  An anonymous, fungible currency would probably cause the collapse of the state, while one that isn't fungible or anonymous would likely be utilized as a tool to create a police state.



854. Post 17687173 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Ibian on January 31, 2017, 06:51:14 PM
Do you really think bitcoin transcends all form of national govt?
Yes. We have been over this literally years ago. Why try to reopen closed topics?

Yea, no.

November 7, 2008: "Yes, [we will not find a solution to political problems in cryptography,] but we can win a major battle in the arms race and gain a new territory of freedom for several years" - Satoshi

Notice it says "several years" and not decades or "forever" and that was already 8 years ago.
Satoshi is an engineer, and a brilliant one. That is why he did not call himself Nostradamus.

You think of the state as others do their preferred god. As a stateist, explain to me how "the state" will do what you have prophetized they will do, on a global basis.

Please, spare me the bullshit.  The "state" banned gold use in America for a long ass time and Bitcoin is far easier for the state to ban or co-opt.  It's the easiest target in the world for the state to take over or demolish.  Stopping the use of metals is a far more monumental task and they were even able to accomplish that.  People pretending bitcoin is immune to the state are the biggest fucking fools in the world.



855. Post 17687267 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Ibian on January 31, 2017, 06:54:59 PM
Please, spare me the bullshit.

Feel free to follow your own advice. Come back when you are ready to do so.

Bitcoin's value isn't even currently derived from point of sale being a settlement layer and all since it doesn't scale to point of sale use, meaning it's value is entirely derived from how much you can dump it for at an exchange.  So just by shutting down a few exchanges you can already kill the value of bitcoin in current state.  Yes, LN is supposed to change that, but whether LN will work or not in a decentralized manner is another topic.



856. Post 17687314 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Ibian on January 31, 2017, 07:01:55 PM
Please, spare me the bullshit.

Feel free to follow your own advice. Come back when you are ready to do so.

Bitcoin's value isn't even currently derived from point of sale being a settlement layer and all since it doesn't scale to point of sale use, meaning it's value is entirely derived from how much you can dump it for at an exchange.  So just by shutting down a few exchanges you can already kill the value of bitcoin in current state.
The value is whatever people are willing to pay for it. This is true no matter how the price is determined. The only way to stop a global price from being agreed on is to literally close the entire internet. Good luck with that.

Yea, just like it's "impossible" to stop people from using gold, right?  Sounds "impossible" to do so on paper, right?  Well, they were able to do it, and bitcoin is far easier to stop.  



857. Post 17696654 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

I miss the good old days when a Chinaman would pump the price by $20 to attract momentum traders then immediately dump it $100.



858. Post 17698693 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Genesis1337 on February 01, 2017, 06:08:40 PM
u think this will be worse than 2008?  Embarrassed

The plan was always to let the so called benefits of the world reserve currency ride out to max length and import actual goods and resources while exporting useless paper and then replace it with metals when it can't go on any longer.  So yea, of course it will be worse than 2008, or different rather.  The government is going to honor social security, so all those people will be fine, but I have no idea about those pensions that are locked up in stocks.  All I know is, once they default on the debt, gold will probably be in the $20,000-$25,000 an ounce range, and silver should see even higher percentage gains.



859. Post 17764880 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

The ETF date is the most interesting part about bitcoin at the moment.  As a regulator you would have to be insane to approve a bitcoin ETF in current state, so if it did get approved it would probably be the government trying to create some alternative target for people to waste their time in and keep them out of the metals markets.  When the current scam system starts to implode, gold will go to at least $20,000 an ounce in current buying power and silver will see even higher percentage gains.  The sooner people figure this out, the faster it does implode - which is why they don't want people creating bull runs in those markets and want to distract people with other things instead.

Someone is going to get all upset that I implied bitcoin is somehow not as good as metals, but by that I just mean that it's very likely metals will have a currency roll again or that the world reserve currency will be metals, while it's very unlikely a nation state or the world reserve currency would be bitcoin.  In fact, it would be a disaster since bitcoin isn't fungible with every transaction traced with white and black lists making it a permissioned ledger in that aspect.  Until/if that issue is resolved, nobody should be wishing for the government or wall street to have any affiliation with bitcoin whatsoever when the odds of it turning into some 1984 scheme are far higher than not.



860. Post 17804993 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

The Chinese govt will not divide us.....from silver going up




861. Post 17805236 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 10, 2017, 05:26:05 PM
The Chinese govt will not divide us.....from silver going up

http://i.imgur.com/fVOJcSa.png

isn't this altcoin pumping?

The funny part is that China has taken control of both the bitcoin and metals market.  The western bankers (like JP Morgan) kept trying to naked short silver down as low as they could but they were forced to stop by the Chinese when there was a $2 spread between the east and west with $15.80 US and $17.80 China.  Now they are reversing their attempts to dump silver because it's just not possible and it's all profits on the long  bull run up from here forth.



862. Post 17805402 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 10, 2017, 05:39:09 PM
The Chinese govt will not divide us.....from silver going up

http://i.imgur.com/fVOJcSa.png

isn't this altcoin pumping?

The funny part is that China has taken control of both the bitcoin and metals market.  The western bankers (like JP Morgan) kept trying to naked short silver down as low as they could but they were forced to stop by the Chinese when there was a $2 spread between the east and west with $15.80 US and $17.80 China.  Now they are reversing their attempts to dump silver because it's just not possible and it's all profits on the long run up from here forth.

You just pretty much admitted that in a digital trading world silver and gold are just like altcoins .... and China made them their bitches.

But you didn't answer my question if silver boosting in here is the same as altcoin pumping?

Anything that doesn't compose the base of Exter's pyramid is a fucking altcoin.

(hint: bitcoin doesn't occupy the base of Exter's pyramid and never will because it's impossible for it to compete with metals as a store of value)



863. Post 17822803 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on February 12, 2017, 06:23:13 AM
I've found poolminor to be quite credible over time yet I still like ya Jimbo. He's not going beartard, just calling the final run of the bulls in the near term with a resumption of the bull trend in some months. Gotta have some red dragons in the future to complete and relaunch the next epic bull run.

I own bitcoin and metals but I'd much rather prefer metals went up and bitcoin didn't because the odds of bitcoin being turned against us and co-opted by govt are much higher than not.  Here's another new predictable govt co-opting of crypto coming out of japan recently:

"Only approved virtual currencies by the authority are considered legitimate and can be traded, sold or promoted to public"

This means government now arbitrates what forks are valid and which are not, so even if you were pretending it was decentralized before, it's definitely not going to be with things like that adopted by national governments.  Laws like this do not mean the govt just plays judge on forks either, it means the govt will create their own fork and force you to use it. (hint: forced chain anchor)

People need to stop being morons and pretending like the govt isn't going to completely control every aspect of cryptocurrency in the endgame.  Every transaction will be traced with white and black lists and more regulation than has ever been seen on earth, aka a permissioned ledger.  The term is called "creeping fascism", when you trick someone into a system while slowly piling on the regulation one by one until it's a police state.  It's like willingly accepting their cash ban and complete control over all transactions once all has been said and done.



864. Post 17823006 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on February 12, 2017, 09:07:06 AM
You keep repeating how governments will control crypto and at the same time implying that they can't or won't control precious metals. This seems inconsistent.

Stop playing dumb.  The overhead to monitor packets on a network or parse transactions on a blockchain is hundreds of orders of magnitude lower than creating a police state that can monitor every inch of space in the physical world for what people do there.  This is why governments aren't attempting to ban bitcoin whatsoever because you just make their job of controlling your life easier and cheaper by using it.  That is, unless someone makes bitcoin fungible by introducing anonymity, then governments won't like it anymore.

The last draw for me was two things in particular:  Coinbase asking me where my bitcoin is from, who are the addresses I'm sending my coins to, etc.  Then a friend made a large bet on a fight using bitcoin sent from Coinbase.  Coinbase apparently actively monitors all transactions and addresses already and said they're banning his account for participating in a gambling site.  If bitcoin is already such a police state while nobody even uses it, you need full blown down syndrome to want this thing to become mainstream.

A lot of you people just sit on your coins to try and profit and don't even use them.  The second you actually try to use them you're in for a shock.  I always knew this was the endgame that bitcoin would have eventually since it's not anonymous and all transactions are traced, I just thought it would be YEARS down the line.  Nope, the bitcoin police state is 100% in effect already.  It's like what that Aaaron Russo guy said 10+ years ago, the goal is to force people into a digital currency and then whoever does anything they don't like, they simply turn off/black list that wallet address - which is going to be associated to your real name with something like chain anchor.



865. Post 17823587 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on February 12, 2017, 10:29:02 AM

I personally feel that this ETF has 85% chances of approval.  Wink

Other ETFs of much less complexity took longer and underwent more scrutiny, so if they approve this one, it basically means bitcoin is a trap.



866. Post 17824089 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Denker on February 12, 2017, 11:25:47 AM
Also the Winklevoss bros are only business men, 100%.

Well, one thing is for sure, they're either going to make a large amount of money or be holding a large bag.  I think their average buy-in price is around $100.  They would make a lot selling right now, but I'm sure people monitor their addresses and if they started to sell they would probably tank the price themselves.  This is one reason the ETF is important to them - it's their exit scheme.  If the ETF is rejected and they start to dump they will still make a decent amount, but not a stupendous amount since everyone else is going to be selling if they are.



867. Post 17861141 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: becoin on February 15, 2017, 01:24:07 PM
Bitcoin price appreciation is not a result of some pump. It is result from organic demand by thousands new users entering Bitcoin every day. They don't care about PBOC or other CBs chaotic behavior.

I honestly do not believe this is true at all.  For one thing, the altcoin market tends to be a good canary in the coalmine.  If there's a flood of new interest in bitcoin, there's typically a flood of new activity in altcoins as well.  The alt markets are currently imploding with volume going down to nothing, so it sure doesn't seem like there's a flood of new people in bitcoin.  The price of bitcoin is also a lot higher, so small guys who want to purchase one bitcoin could have done so when it was $200-400, but it takes a pretty large leap of faith to buy one when the price is $1000.

If anyone is moving the price of bitcoin around, it's the usual suspects of Chinese mining cartel, Digital Currency Group, Pantera Capital, Winklevoss, fraudulent exchanges, etc.  One thing that's a giant red flag to me is that ever since Bitfinex goxed, the western price is still determined by that insolvent, scammy exchange with all the big moves occurring there and not places like Bitstamp.  There's no market maker on earth who is going to risk his funds at an insolvent exchange like that, yet with Finex being the market maker, this tells me the people running these fraudulent exchanges might be the main people moving price.

Finex has a great history of walls going plus or minus 4000ish coins at random from a single entity in the past and as of very recently.  Would you store $4 million on Bitfinex post Finex goxing?  I sure as hell wouldn't.  It's probably the exchange owner/employees themselves.  Here was Finex's walls right after they came online after they goxed everyone.  The sell side is clearly all from one single entity (around ~3600 coins), likely from the exchange owners since nobody on earth is gonna keep all those coins stored there right after they stole everyone's money:



Nothing ever changes.  Karpeles controlled the Bitcoin price then he passed the baton onto another exchange owner.



868. Post 17861943 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: jackjack on February 15, 2017, 03:10:40 PM
Not scary at all

Not quite as scary as Larry Summers (Jew) wanting to ban cash to help further enslave the goyim while also promoting Bitcoin/"blockchain" and being involved in Digital Currency Group.




869. Post 17881404 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

There is a LOT of buy support over the last few days, much higher than normal.  Instead of 5, 10, or 20 blocks of coins being purchased, there's a steady stream of larger whale buys of 100 coins at a time.  This indicates one of three things:

1)  Someone is front running a Bitcoin ETF approval w/ insider trading

2)  Someone has no idea if the ETF will be approved but is buying just in case

3)  There were some insolvent Chinese exchanges that are now having to purchase at top dollar



870. Post 17881553 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: soullyG on February 17, 2017, 10:09:16 AM
"Science doesn't make it impossible to believe in God, it just makes it possible not to believe in God" - Steven Weinberg

Interesting quote from someone named "Weinberg" considering the first thing the Jews did after Moses left is build a statue out of gold and worship it as their god:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_calf



871. Post 17884681 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Paashaas on February 17, 2017, 03:34:46 PM
Bitcoin is just like a balloon underwater, some try to hold in under but the longer they keep it underwater the harder it will shoot up.

Bitcoin is not exactly the first attempt at monetary reform:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFIuATI0558

I hate those Zionist Jews with there Pyramid Debt Slave Fiat Ponzi Banking System. They got so much power for so many years, even huge army's cant take them out...But now, we can by-pass them with Bitcoin without fireing one singel shot! Thats my main reason why i'm a fanatic Bitcoin supporter, financial freedom for everybody!

Bitcoin can't defeat them for numerous reasons such as mining centralizing via economy of scale where you need to be a corporation-level entity to participate at all.  Bitcoin will be ruled by oligarchs with the last name "Goldstein" just like every other financial product on earth.  Attempting to remove the economy of scale aspect usually opens you up to Sybil attack.  To actually make bitcoin decentralized, you would have to use more advanced cryptography and invent decentralized captchas or puzzles where users manually solve them by hand instead of oligarchs creating giant, automated farms where they rule over bitcoin as slumlords, rigging the fee markets and siphoning off all the transaction fees until they own them all, maintaining their slavery over you.

In other words, it's EXTREMELY difficult for Bitcoin to make a real positive impact on the financial world in current form.  The only real decentralized currencies on earth known to man are using the noble metals as currency in physical form (not "backed" paper).  Of the noble metals, only two qualify for use as currency:  gold and silver.  Of those two contestants, "they" have already cornered one of them - gold, leaving you with silver as the only real decentralized currency on earth in the current state of affairs.  Although JP Morgan supposedly owns more silver than the Hunt Brothers did now - 550 million ounces ($10 billion).



872. Post 17885062 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Just about all these exchanges are MtGoxs.  Huobi and their constantly running algorithm that moves the price around wherever it wants at will is even more shady than MtGox was.



873. Post 17886306 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on February 17, 2017, 06:13:39 PM
What happened with r0ach? Wasn't he very bullish on bitcoin last year?

I still own bitcoin, but there is no possible endgame for Bitcoin whatsoever where having bitcoin become the world reserve currency would be better for humanity than using gold and silver.  Kaczsynky was right and increasing technology is always inherently anti-freedom.  Bitcoin isn't even fungible and all transactions are traced for fucks sake.  It's already an Orwellian system by default, and it's inevitable the entire thing from top to bottom will be co-opted by govt the further it goes.

Like I said before, government is going to create a fixed address alias system wrapper that goes around bitcoin and force you to use it or be considered a launderer.  You think you've defeated "the man" (or jew as the case may be) by using bitcoin, but the jokes on you if you think that's the case.  After they get you into that system, then they'll turn the entire thing keynesian with infinite coin count.  Bitcoin probably already needs to turn inflationary to defeat it's newest discovered attack vector in the first place.

The end result by herding everyone into bitcoin will be nothing more than bankers accomplishing their cash ban with the added bonus of full surveillance police state built into it and you willingly accepted it.  Deep down, everybody fucking knows what I'm saying is true, but they're in it for the short term profit gains.  If you could play god and invest X amount of money into silver or bitcoin then physically delete the one you didn't pick from time and space afterwards, there is no reason whatsoever to choose bitcoin if you value having some type of freedom in the long term.

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on February 17, 2017, 07:05:36 PM
He obviously sold all of his coins and went all in on silver expecting it to moon after Trump started his trade/currency wars with China. I have my fair share of silver but my sentiment for Bitcoin is way higher. Silver is merely for bartering if the shtf.

No, I still obviously have a lot of BTC or I wouldn't be posting here.



874. Post 17886412 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: podyx on February 17, 2017, 07:14:46 PM


Of course mentioning a non-fungible currency where every transaction is traced with white and black lists - making it a permissioned ledger - is not going to lead everyone to the promised land of economic freedom and sound money is going "full retard".  It can possibly give you an end to debt based currency in the short term, but I believe govt will co-opt it and turn it into infinite coin count anyway.  Like I said before, the newest attack vectors point to the fact that bitcoin will likely have to turn inflationary in the first place to defeat them.

Then after they put their alias system wrapper around bitcoin and force you to use it, they'll probably use that to auto-deduct taxes from you in some manner (at the 90% rate for people like Roger Ver), so you're just trading debt based currency for "confiscate everything" currency.  We might be able to make money in the short term, though.  Just don't forget to use the profits to buy gold and silver - the only known, real decentralized currencies on earth and base of Exter's pyramid.



875. Post 17886478 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Holliday on February 17, 2017, 07:24:18 PM
Then why has no one been caught for all these high profile thefts / hacks?

Why would they be?  Mixers and things like monero (just a built in mixer on-chain) aren't illegal...yet.  There will come a time when using a mixer will be a conviction for laundering by default and all transactions will be to and from fixed address alias systems.  Everything outside of that will be considered criminal and the coins will be blacklisted.  The side effect of a non-fungible currency = permissioned ledger.  You're not getting around governments co-opting any digital currency system made.  Even Satoshi says the same thing via two quotes:  "bitcoin does not solve political problems" and "bitcoin will buy us only a few years".



876. Post 17886711 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Holliday on February 17, 2017, 07:35:03 PM
I fully expect Bitcoin to be illegal in most places some day.

Bitcoin does not function if made illegal.  First off, the network traffic is not obfuscated.  Second, the mining pools are too huge of an attack vector.  Third, it's usage would be barter only in the black market.  Unless bitcoin captured every transaction from the entire drug market on earth it's market cap would be tiny.  So basically a small market cap with an insecure chain.  If you outlaw gold it does not incur a penalty on gold's security; it does for bitcoin.  As for mining the actual coins, it would be even less decentralized than it is now, or maybe entirely controlled by one single guy.  

You can't mine it with commodity hardware so all mining would be controlled by some shady guy in the backstreets of Shanghai.  It would be like having to visit the Mogwai dealer in gremlins in order to mine.  In fact, it's already basically like that in the first place.






877. Post 17887112 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: jbreher on February 17, 2017, 08:22:50 PM
Doesn't appear that The SegWit Omnibus Changeset will ever amass the 95% block requirement for activation. What's plan B?




878. Post 17887477 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: HanvanBitcoin on February 17, 2017, 09:01:54 PM
I was Lucky enough to get in the bitcoin train again at the last dip @ 971$ a week ago  Grin




879. Post 17897109 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: jbreher on February 18, 2017, 12:19:25 AM
Yes, that's the one. Years ago, I shouted down bitcoin disbelievers telling them that 'of course the block size will be increased by the time they get full'. I didn't dream that there would be others who would resist this idea. Mea culpa.

If you accept my thesis that bitcoin is not a store of value, any block size in which the function of bitcoin is to act as a settlement network is useless because:

1)  the main point of a settlement network is acting as a store of value

2)  precious metals function as a store of value far superior than bitcoin does

This means there is virtually zero difference between 1 MB and 10 MB blocks.  I did some calculations to try and quantify how much TPS bitcoin needs in order to not be a settlement network (since it has no value as a settlement network), and came up with the number 5000.  I then looked up how much TPS Visa pushes and...low and behold, peaks at 4000 TPS a day.

So my general conclusion on this entire mess is, bitcoin has no value without a functioning lightning network type of system that allows it to expand beyond a settlement network into the neighborhood of something like 5000 TPS.  This means arguing over 1 MB, 2 MB, and 4 MB blocks has no relevance to anything.  However, someone would need to figure out a safe base block size in order to support 5000 TPS for when numerous people all close channels simultaneously.




880. Post 17897470 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: DieJohnny on February 18, 2017, 07:32:56 PM
bitcoin has no value without a functioning lightning network type of system

Might I refer you to..... THE LAST 8 YEARS......

Of speculation...just like...



The rubber has to meet the road eventually.  Bitcoin's main use was the drug market, which would give each coin a value of something like $10-100 at most.  The rest of that is all expectation of future growth.  For those expectations to be realized, it will have to expand TPS beyond that of a settlement network or blow up.




881. Post 17898325 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: AlexGR on February 18, 2017, 08:51:40 PM
I think the chances are actually closer to 2-5% than "<25%" of the market analysts etc etc.

It depends.  The wildcard variable in this situation is how badly the malevolent, enemy of mankind, Jewish bankers want to try and force everyone into a digital cash only slave system.  If they believe people getting accustomed to bitcoin helps them in this process to fiscally rape you, then hello bitcoin ETF.

It's possible they might believe adding a bitcoin ETF will also keep people out of the metals market and prevent a run on their fractional reserve Comex.  I think that would be a stupid assumption since if Bitcoin went to like $10,000, people like me would be wiping out all the metals that exist, but you never know what goes on in the mind of the shylock.



882. Post 17898544 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: prophetx on February 18, 2017, 09:56:28 PM
just another reason for dismantling the bureaucracy

Make world great again




883. Post 17906223 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: gentlemand on February 19, 2017, 01:24:30 PM
Keep your reasoned facts to yourself, especially when there's bigotry on the line.




884. Post 17919584 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Julian Assange has given the go ahead that everything looks perfectly normal on Chinese exchanges:




885. Post 17939755 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

This market is funny, it has no type of reasoning behind it.  The price spikes up to a double top on bitstamp then some random person just puts in a market order for $150,000.  Yea, I realize any market with two corresponding walls is nothing but manipulation to determine price, but it's funny watching it play out for an imaginary object with no inelastic demand.  Nobody can be like "oh yea, that was Dell buying some copper to wire their new buildings".  Everyone watching is just like, "Good job Chinese market manipulator".  And that's basically the synopsis of this entire market lol.



886. Post 17955036 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Scamfinex is using the old whale trick of buying into their own walls to try and spur buying activity.  Notice how there's constantly been buys of 100 - 200 coins the last few days while no activity like that happens whatsoever on Bitstamp.  I'm so fucking tired of looking at Bitfinex's fraud activity after they naked shorted their own exchange then goxed everyone during halving.  These guys should be in prison.  

If large market makers actually were making constant buys of that size, they would not be using a completely insolvent exchange that already stole people's money in order to do so.  They would be using Bitstamp or one of the other exchanges.  Nobody risks millions of dollars on an exchange already guilty of goxing people.  Seriously, who here uses Bitfinex right now?  Nobody right?  So who the hell are these buyers supposed to be?



887. Post 17955325 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):



So basically Scamfinex wants you to believe there's millionaires just beating down the doors to buy all the bitcoins in sight on an exchange you would have to be insane to trust with your money, while on the more legit Bitstamp exchange the buys are less than 1/10th the size.  I almost feel like Bitfinex no longer has any users at all and we're just watching an API feed of one guy selling imaginary coins back and forth to himself.  I don't think they even have margin enabled anymore either.



888. Post 17955352 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: SkRRJyTC on February 23, 2017, 10:15:57 PM
Leverage is a hell of a drug

I didn't think Bitfinex even had leverage enabled anymore.  I haven't used them since halving when they goxed but looked in on them the other day and it was still disabled.



889. Post 17955544 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on February 23, 2017, 10:30:11 PM
Leverage is a hell of a drug

I didn't think Bitfinex even had leverage enabled anymore.  I haven't used them since halving when they goxed but looked in on them the other day and it was still disabled.

of course they do, what are the BTC swaps for if not for leverage trading?

Weird, I tried to use Finex margin trading the other day after someone said they no longer had it and it blocked me from doing so saying it was disabled.



890. Post 17962015 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: harrymmmm on February 24, 2017, 05:29:47 AM
There's a 2k wall at $1225 on finex. Maybe these are goldbug walls to slow down bitcoin/gold price parity.

The price of gold and silver both go up after bitcoin does from people like me converting imaginary money to real money.  If ETF was approved by some absurd chance, I'm taking all those profits straight to silver.



891. Post 18003976 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: becoin on February 26, 2017, 10:07:21 AM
No, I don't trade on the stock market. It is a giant ponzi scheme. Bitcoin is different.

I have a feeling this post will be stickied front page on /r/buttcoin.



892. Post 18005695 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Paashaas on February 28, 2017, 03:30:16 AM
When a stock drops with 10% ore $10 lots of people are shocked..but when Bitcoin drops like $50-$100 ore even $200 last month was still not enough to starting to panic big time?

Are we to spoiled ore are we having big balls of steel and can handle everything Huh

I think we're getting huge respect from other non-Bitcoin traders, right?

Oh well, dollar cost average per coin 0




893. Post 18030373 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Gold people coming out of the woodwork against bitcoin heh:



Both Rickards and Schiff are actually correct, they just don't know why and don't know enough about bitcoin to articulate it, but this is why

Quote from: r0ach on March 01, 2017, 11:23:22 PM
The fact is, bitcoin does NOT function as a store of value, period.  The way bitcoin is designed pigeonholes it into acting as a settlement layer, and what is the #1 attribute needed for being a settlement layer?  ...being a store of value.  This makes it kind of inherently designed to fail at what it's supposed to do because bitcoin does not exist in a vacuum, it has to compete against the noble metals.  The noble metals are orders of magnitude better in anti-fragility, store of value, and even decentralization than bitcoin is.

As I said before:

A settlement layer has to compete with or beat gold as a store of value.  Bitcoin cannot accomplish that task so it has to do something else besides being a settlement layer or there is no point!

This means bitcoin's value has to be floated by raw transaction flow instead of people hoarding it for no reason as a store of value.  It is my estimate that you would need something like 5000 TPS in order for bitcoin to function as a raw transaction handler instead of a store of value.  And the following post explains why bitcoin isn't a store of value in the first place:

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-vol-7-bitcoin-is-not-an-actual-store-of-value-because-there-is-no-real-price-floor-or-inelastic-demand

*Disclaimer:  I am not bearish on the price of bitcoin in the short term, just that once it's market cap has topped out, everyone is going to convert the profits straight to the base of Exter's pyramid (gold and silver) due to being more anti-fragile and a better store of value.



894. Post 18030617 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 01, 2017, 11:53:54 PM
^^

Not sure which planet you've dropped in from .... but bitcoin has been shitting all over gold in annual returns for 7 out of 8 years of its short existence.

You're beloved Central Banking scumbag friends have made gold their bitch for the last century, so i guess you've got that going for it  Huh

You're farting against the thunder of a historical change in humanities conception of money.

You didn't refute anything I said and just posted the equivalent of a bitcoin bumper sticker.  Bitcoin does not function as a store of value.  In the long run I believe this will be a rather large problem since being a store of value is critical to a settlement network.  In the short term the price can pump and dump to any kind of number imaginable.  The market can be irrational longer than you can remain solvent, as the saying goes.

As for a real world example, let's say you worked your entire life, 40-50 years or whatever, and you're sitting on a pile of money and are forced at gunpoint to convert every cent of it into either gold and silver or bitcoin.  In that theoretical example, who is actually going to choose bitcoin?  Pretty much nobody.  It's not because bitcoin is an "immature" technology or whatever.  This is the way it will always be.  Bitcoin cannot defeat the noble metals as the base of Exter's pyramid.  It's completely impossible.



895. Post 18030708 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 02, 2017, 12:22:58 AM
I saw that wall. It's kind of ridiculous. Don't multi-millionaires have more fun things to do than flash monster-sized bitcoin walls?

That wasn't a wall of bitcoins. It was a wall of USD.

Saw the same thing yesterday. An offer to buy 1000 coins appears out of the blue and vanishes seconds later.

Same person or group?

It's a whale signal that they want other whales to drop suppression walls and move the market up.  Of course whales can always double cross other whales and all kinds of fuckery.



896. Post 18030912 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 02, 2017, 12:43:19 AM
Don't get me wrong I like gold, I've been long gold and silver since 1996, the famous Goat got his gold high school training wheels from the mother-of-another in ye old kitco forum ...

... but time to move with times, gold has it's place, in history mostly and bitcoin is the future.

Let me help you put two and two together.  The fraudulent, leveraged, debt based, monetary system requires infinite growth to not implode through cascading deflationary collapse.  We have a demographics curve and energy curve that have both maxed out.  Peak *conventional* crude was in 2004, and the working age demographic stalled out for every country that actually matters.

This means the current system has to unravel/deleverage, but guess what?  You can't taper a ponzi scheme.  This means a monetary reset and huge paradigm shift is inevitable in the near future to transition into a steady state economy instead of the one we have based on infinite growth.

The governments of the world and private citizens will utilize gold and silver as the basis of this new system.  Do you seriously for one second believe governments are going to adopt bitcoin as the world reserve currency?  It's not going to happen.  Yes, bitcoin can still exist and be utilized by people, but gold and silver will be the basis of the new system.  So you can type "bitcoin is the future" all you want, but it's not true whatsoever.  Gold and silver are the future and bitcoin might play some tertiary role, but it's definitely not going to be the leader.



897. Post 18038849 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Torque on March 02, 2017, 03:32:09 PM
So show me all these so-called 'positive' Bitcoin articles on Mainstream media sites like Bloomberg and Business Insider

There's been plenty of positive bitcoin stuff on Business Insider.  They've featured me on their website + David Seaman.  Seaman is a shitlib, but he's also a pro-bitcoin shill and at least talked about #pizzagate while being a lib.  It is unfortunate that lots of people feel the need to pretend to be metrosexual leftists in order to make themselves appear intelligent - Keith Olbermann style with the glasses and all.



898. Post 18041466 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on March 02, 2017, 07:43:16 PM
Forget an ATH and "gold parity", the true crazyness of today: BTC-e almost at the same price as Stamp and Finex.  Grin

The real interesting question is what is actually happening when the price of bitcoin skyrockets:  Let's use a wild example and say bitcoin went to $100,000.  This would be inflating the general money supply assuming people were buying things directly with bitcoin.  You are placing in a dollar substitute, kind of like counterfeiting (not the greatest term, but best example I could think of).  The overall effect is more money in the system.

Since nobody is buying things with bitcoin directly, it remains a derivative of the USD like almost all other fiat currencies.  This also makes bitcoin constrained by things like dollar liquidity shortages, etc, where federal reserve monetary policy is essentially bitcoin monetary policy.



899. Post 18041658 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: cmacwiz on March 02, 2017, 08:15:53 PM
Now 1 arbitrary unit of account (a BTC), in a decentralized protocol thought up and developed from nothing more than an idea, is worth more than an oz of GOLD... In <10 years.

It's kind of a meaningless metric when the # of bitcoin units is completely arbitrary and could have just as easily been 42 million.  I actually have the opposite view myself.  When I see the bitcoin market cap starting to creep up rivaling that of silver, it makes me want to sell bitcoin for silver because I do not believe any rational universe would have the price of bitcoin over metal's market caps.  But I am a trader and always looking for imbalances, bubbles, and inverse bubbles to shift wealth into something else for profit.

I personally think bitcoin will hit a pretty big growth wall with 1 MB blocks and no segwit when cost to get into next block gets to around $1-2.  So bitcoin in current state might be starting to get near limits of growth, while gold and silver are both in inverse bubbles where you're kinda guaranteed to score a home run on a long enough timeline (silver even more so than gold).



900. Post 18042243 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Lesbian Cow on March 02, 2017, 09:18:55 PM
I will sell when:

1) rpeitila announces the renovation of his castle

2) Goat buys a new car

I'll happily dump for silver at peak of ETF approval pump (if such a thing is approved).  And why - my long term macro view on the subect (not to be confused with short term view):

Quote from: r0ach on March 02, 2017, 09:07:15 PM
The fact that bitcoin can be so called "upgraded", which really just means changed, means it's not anti-fragile by default.  Being able to be changed is a actually a bad thing that makes it not anti-fragile, or fungible, or money in the first place.  It's why crypto will always be cryptocurrency and never money.  We are all just fascinated by complex Rube Goldberg machines.  Obfuscate something to the nth degree until nobody knows what it's traits really are or what it's really doing.

Ok, time to pump this here coin.  Oh, what's that?  In order to believe it doesn't have value someone is required to have a computer science degree and then spend years dissecting it's traits in order to figure that out?  And even then, multiple computer science majors will have completely differing opinions because it's almost impossible to be a master in all required subjects?  Perfect, let's create an ETF before anyone discovers.

Quote from: r0ach on March 02, 2017, 08:50:08 PM
Money is something that can't arbitrarily be changed by some guy on a random whim when he wakes up in the morning...or change the security model to something else entirely.  Money can't transform to something completely different at random.  Why is bitcoin not banned?  Because the govt loves people wasting their time with currency instead of having actual money.  That and the fact that it's designed as a 1984 tracking system by default.

Quote from: r0ach on March 02, 2017, 08:45:06 PM
Bitcoin is also a CURRENCY, not money, just like any attempt to replace bitcoin will also be a currency.  CURRENCY has never been a good investment on a long timeline ever.  Currency never holds value.  It doesn't matter if it's bitcoin or anonymint coin, they all implode to worthless.  They are RECEIPTS for money.  



901. Post 18042313 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Lauda on March 02, 2017, 09:36:56 PM
I'll happily dump for silver at peak of ETF approval pump (if such a thing is approved).
Simply put: You're a delusional metal bagholder. It seems that you're on the wrong forum

Delusional is when you are unable to identify fundamentals and are on an investment-centric forum.  Comparing bitcoin vs metals fundamentals is also completely on-topic to price discussion.  Like I said before, the market can be irrational longer than you can remain solvent, but on a long enough timeline, bitcoin should behave as a currency and not "money".  Currencies are typically not stores of value.  

It has taken me a LONG TIME to really do a thorough analysis of bitcoin because there are just far too many variables, but there it is.  For most of the time I was focused on complete red herrings like the consensus systems and nash equilibrium, but most of that is just smoke and mirrors to obfuscate the fact that nobody can really get rid of a centralizing power vacuum force.  Instead of make believing that some new change is going to improve things, the proper analysis is that the ability to be so called "upgraded", which just means changed, is nothing but a negative in the first place.



902. Post 18044153 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: BTCtrader71 on March 02, 2017, 10:58:29 PM
To what extent does your analysis rest on the assertion that bitcoin can

... arbitrarily be changed by some guy on a random whim when he wakes up in the morning...

Because that is really not a fair summary of the situation. Which I am sure you know without me telling you. But I wonder whether your analysis is fully settled (in your own mind) ...

Even if you don't assume it centralizes through economy of scale, or that mining cartels or other special interest groups take over, another event occurred just recently that many people did not pick up on with legislation in Japan (that will obviously happen everywhere else too).  Govt is a monopoly on force, and cryptocurrency does not supercede political interests or the only consensus system in the real world (force).  Whoever controls the courts controls what bitcoin turns into.  Here is the Japanese legislation:

Quote from: r0ach on February 22, 2017, 09:25:05 PM
"Only approved virtual currencies by the authority are considered legitimate and can be traded, sold or promoted to public"

This means govt is the legal arbitrator of forks.  The US, UK, and EU will hold a meeting and all collude saying only the fork with chain anchor or worse is the real bitcoin!  Since they can easily control the exchanges and mining pools, people will be forced to use that fork or have their coins become worthless.  The only reason bitcoin isn't illegal is because they know how easy it is to co-opt and morph it into their cashless society control grid.



903. Post 18044319 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Torque on March 03, 2017, 01:52:08 AM
Aleppo is currently a war zone. Which do you think the refugees would currently be better off trying to smuggle out of the city, bitcoin or gold?  Which would be easier?  Hmmm?

I was looking into bitcoin in Venezuela after hearing people claim you could buy months of food for 1oz of silver.  I looked into what bitcoin was going for there thinking it would also have a huge premium and it seems instead of a premium, bitcoin goes for less money than in normal, functioning countries lol.  I guess it makes sense because complex systems don't jump to more complexity when they implode (bitcoin), they go back to a more simple state.




904. Post 18044970 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Paashaas on March 03, 2017, 03:26:25 AM
I'm pretty sure gold will be almost worthless within 50 years, just wait untill the age of space mining starts.

Can you guys stop freebasing crack before you talk about economics?  Earth is mostly a closed ecosystem and anything you're dragging in from the cosmos is going to have orders of magnitude higher cost of production.  The original moon landing was 1969, so we're already 50 years after that date and the level of progress in moon mining is laughable.  

You also need to process around 10-100 tons of rock just to get an ounce of gold.  You going to do all that out in space or do you plan to just crash giant asteroids into the surface of the earth and kill everyone?  Feel free to go mine gold at the cost of production of $10 million an ounce and having to build nuclear power plants out in space to process all the rocks!  Or do you plan to constantly drag Saudi oil tankers into space with you to raise cost of production even higher?




905. Post 18045392 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

I'm disappointed.  Jbreher is like the smartest of you apes and this was a pretty feeble attempt at trying to portray bitcoin as having traits of money equal or better than metals:

Quote from: r0ach on March 03, 2017, 04:12:10 AM
The fact that bitcoin can be so called "upgraded", which really just means changed, means it's not anti-fragile by default.  
On this point, you minsunderstand the definition of anti-fragile. By definition, in order to be anti-fragile, a thing must be able to evolve.

No, it does not.  Money is supposed to be boring - it's not supposed to "evolve" from a metal bar into a tarantula when you look away to the TV then back to it.  If it evolves it's not fungible, and what the hell is the molding force causing this evolution?  It's definitely not a nash equilibrium.  There would always be holdouts or people who want to evolve differently, and then the entire thing is just complete arbitrary nonsense of what cutoff level you set for voting.  That's mob rule, not anti-fragile.

Voting doesn't belong in money.  Voting is nothing but an attack vector.  It's like that sig you sometimes see that says "democracy is the original 51% attack".  A fork isn't an upgrade, it's an attack sanctioned by mob rule.  You have mob rule of the proletariat (users) vs oligarchy of capital owners (mining cartel).  The second these two factions have to come to the table against one another you probably just end up with a rough consensus attack and the whole thing blows up anyway because their interests are not aligned whatsoever.

If miners believe it's required to add inflation to bitcoin to fix the security model (which it probably is), then they would probably do something like that, while a giant portion of users wouldn't want their coins inflated and would switch to something completely different like proof of stake.  There is no fungibility, consistency, or anti-fragility in any of this.



906. Post 18046657 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on March 03, 2017, 07:27:44 AM
I think we all aware of the ETF decision next week and we here mostly agree it won't happen and therefore....

Small dump? Large dump?

It depends.  Every evil, zionist banker shill in govt from Ben Bernanke to David Cameron has approved of bitcoin and wants the goyim to utilize it so every transaction you make can be tracked, and they know they can easily co-opt it to sidetrack you into their digital only, cashless society as well.  If they believe an ETF helps them accomplish this task in some manner, or it allows them to more easily manipulate the price up or down, then an ETF approval is not so far fetched.

There's just been way too many government tyrants and zionist financiers who have given bitcoin the thumbs up for me to believe they have any interest in trying to stop it.  Some of them want you to use it solely so you'll stay out of the already stretched thin gold and silver market.  Other banker shills want you to use it because they think it accommodates people to a cashless only society or that they can co-opt it.  I'd say it's 50/50 at this point.



907. Post 18046774 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Lauda on March 03, 2017, 07:55:38 AM
If you think that Bitcoin is just a currency, you don't know what you're talking about. Cut the analysis bullshit and go back into your metal bagholding forums. You can't sell me such stories.

I guess you did not get the hint when they named it cryptocurrency instead of....cryptomoney.  It is a currency; it's not money.  Currencies are generally always a bad investment on a long timeline and there is no reason to own them unless you actually use them.  Once the market cap tops out, whether that's at $1200 a coin, $200 a coin, or $10,000 a coin, everyone who was attempting to use it as a store of value is going to flee the ship to the base of Exter's pyramid (metals) since they are a superior store of value, while the only people that continue to hold coins will be the people who actually use it as a currency.  

The number of people using it as a currency will obviously be factored by it's throughput (TPS).  To have a high market cap as a currency, TPS would probably have to be drastically higher than it is now with something like a functioning LN and 5000 TPS.  At that level it could probably float a large market cap as a payment processor, but I do not see a currency functioning well at low TPS with 1 MB blocks and no segwit or LN since low TPS is counterintuitive to how a currency is supposed to function (high turnover, not based on being a store of value or generational investment).



908. Post 18053567 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Pretty interesting article on what the bankers have been attempting over the last 45 years.  Apparently they've spent this entire time trying to demonetize gold and force SDR notes on people while forbidding other CBs from purchasing gold at all, yet China and Russian CBs are both buying it by the boatload now.  They've been working on trying to force this completely top down controlled "cashless" monetary system devoid of real money longer than people imagine.  If you attempt to buy or use gold as a CB, you become an enemy of the Zionist monetary regime run by the IMF and BIS, and they use their military arm (the Zionist occupied United States) to attack you:






909. Post 18054120 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 03, 2017, 07:42:30 PM
such as your misappropriation of anti-fragile

Again, my response to that:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg18053760#msg18053760

and my reply to the bogus reddit chart some guy posted that lies about all traits of bitcoin in order to try and pump and dump it lol:

Quote from: cellard on March 03, 2017, 07:30:18 PM


Quote from: r0ach on March 03, 2017, 07:38:11 PM
You posted a reddit propaganda chart that flat out lies and claims bitcoin is fungible, not to mention the part about "secure", "durable" and "decentralized" are not even a given.  And how does the rough consensus attack play into scarcity?  That chart was clearly created solely to try and pump and dump bitcoin and not for any type of education.  

Someone is also probably going to claim "you can't destroy bitcoin with a hammer so it's durable!".  Bitcoin requires a positive energy input to exist at all.  How is that durable?  It's essentially a living organism and all living things die.  Bitcoin is a screen door standing in the way of the truck known as entropy to be run over and scattered to the wind, while things like gold are more entropy resistant (but not proof).  And that is why one is money and one is only a currency.  Money is supposed to be boring and not mutate into something else or cease to exist at random.



910. Post 18054247 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 03, 2017, 08:21:23 PM

If I read your reply correctly, you are essentially claiming 'language changes, so I get to be the one who changes it'. I reply: no, you don't.

Anti-fragility by definition requires the ability to evolve. If not, then 'anti-fragile' would be a redundant synonym for 'non-fragile'.

Again, I consider "anti-fragile" mostly just a made up slogan in the first place that people try to attach an arbitrary definition to.  You claim I didn't use the word correctly then forgot to mention that it was popularized by people in bitcoin who also have never used the word correctly in the first place.  If everyone uses the word in a completely different colloquial manner, then that definition usually takes over.  Anyway, who cares, it was a term popularized by people trying to pump and dump bitcoin and claiming it's as sturdy and durable as gold when it's not.



911. Post 18056614 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: cmacwiz on March 04, 2017, 12:50:28 AM
$1.3k by tonight, or else.....     Grin Grin

Does anyone know a good magic the gathering website that accepts bitcoin? Something like an exchange for btc and mtg cards, some sort of magic the gathering online exchange....




912. Post 18056888 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 04, 2017, 01:38:47 AM
must feel pretty shit for you and roach to get cucked by the raging bull bitcoin, such a gimped currency and still crapping all over gold and silver?

You cucks might have to spend a night (or two?) spooning to make each other feel better? Put a roll of gold coins in there to warm yas all up too maybe?

LOL pwned.

Don't be so hard on the gold bugs. They can't help it. They try to replace brains with shiny things.  Grin

This paper market ponzi looks like it's getting a little close to the end of days:




913. Post 18057029 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 04, 2017, 01:54:25 AM
My bitcoins are as real as the metal hanging around Lawrence Turauld's neck.

The main issue with your thinking is the assumption that bitcoin is free of counter party risk just because you have the private keys.  It's not.  MatTheCat is a few Budweisers short of a 6pack and even he figured this out.  Holding a commodity form of money in your hand (generally noble metals) and defending it with an AR15 is really the only way to completely get out of counter party risk, as the bitcoins never actually leave the blockchain in the first place - an electronic amalgamation of a domain in which you don't really have any power over yourself.



914. Post 18057408 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Johnny00 on March 04, 2017, 03:00:55 AM
Bound to be a correction. This must be all FOMO. Etf gets rejected then this will drop. More buying opportunities. Thing is every here is just holding acting like this is gold. Once people start panicking might crash quick

If anything, there are more shorters to squeeze and a ton of bitcoin media spam right now so it would likely keep going up till ETF.  Bitfinex is a crooked bucketshop, so if anyone but the house takes out a large position on that exchange or Okcoin it's going to be squeezed by Finex moving the market.  And if the house takes out a position and it doesn't go their way, well, there's going to be a goxing.



915. Post 18065301 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Are we rich yet?




916. Post 18065474 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: york780 on March 04, 2017, 06:04:12 PM
No, the media is almost everytime negative about bitcoin. The only 'insiders' you are talking about just cashed out. Some big fishes dumped their coins for fiat money. Thats my indicator for what the outcome of the COIN ETF will be.

People running the Bitfinex bucketshop trading on their own exchange have no inside knowledge of ETF approval, so those people buying or dumping doesn't really tell you anything.  People who are leveraged also cut and run with the profits they already accumulated even in a 50/50 approval/rejection scenario.



917. Post 18065853 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Oblodo on March 04, 2017, 06:55:35 PM
Fact:
Insiders (and therefore the media) *always* know the outcome of something ahead of the Average Joe public. This is how they cheat the system. So they would already know if the COIN ETF was disapproved.

Hypothesis:
So if they already know it is disapproved, why in the last 2 weeks have the media gone into overdrive with the "it's unlikely to get approved" and "low chance of approval" and all the "warnings" and "risks" articles? Wouldn't their behavior be quite the opposite? (meaning no effort need to be expended)

I.E., they wouldn't need to expend so much effort to dissuade the public away from Bitcoin, if the disapproval was already known to them. Correct??  Wink

Paranoid and off your medication? No order, just chaos and coincidences. Read a bit about neuropsychology and stop with the conspiratory nonsense..

Your response to him makes 0 sense because it's a fact just about everything is insider traded.  The media, especially CNBC, ALWAYS tells you to dump at the floor and buy at the top, like when they were spamming gold was a "barbarous relic" and then it skyrockets right after.  Whether his analysis is true or not is another thing entirely.  The banker shills floating around seem to actually want people to use bitcoin nowadays (because they know how easy it is to co-opt), with people like Ben Bernanke and David Cameron endorsing it, so there's no telling what effect things like that will have on ETF approval.



918. Post 18066319 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: K~Ehleyr on March 04, 2017, 07:26:45 PM
Proof or STFU.






919. Post 18107110 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 08, 2017, 05:01:42 AM
we are so DOOOOOOMED!




920. Post 18113278 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Adam trolling about BU forks brings all the bears to the yard:





921. Post 18118440 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 09, 2017, 02:54:05 AM
give blocksize to the free market and you'll have the best fucking blocksize there ever was.

If you ever figure out that bitcoin is a currency and not money, you'll know that it's market cap has to be floated by sheer transaction volume and not as a store of value.  Unlike what Hal Finney thought might happen, bitcoin does not have value as a settlement layer in a free market without coercion.  Bitcoin can never compete with metals on Exter's pyramid because gold and silver demolish it as a store of value due to being more anti-fragile (colloquial use of the word, FU jbreher).  

As soon as the bitcoin market cap topped out, people would immediately dump them all for metals instead.  There is no point in attempting to store generational wealth in an inferior medium for no reason that can be gone with the wind at random.  Bitcoin can be destroyed by all kinds of things while it takes something like a black hole hitting the earth to black swan metals.  The only way bitcoin has any hopes of competing with gold and silver is in utility, not trying to replicate what gold and silver already do and doing so in a worse manner.

The point is, current on-chain scaling will all result in bitcoin still being a settlement layer.  If you try to design bitcoin as a settlement layer, I believe it will fail because it can't compete with gold and silver in that regard.  You'd need to be getting into the thousands of TPS for it not to be a settlement layer, then people aren't required to store huge sums of money in it (as governed by what's economical due to transaction fees) where you'd basically be forced to use bitcoin as your savings account if you wish to use it at all with on-chain scaling.

The only way out of that conundrum is transaction bundling in some type of LN-like system.  Whether an LN-type system can be made to work in a decentralized manner is a different story.  It seems like it would also require buffering transactions in a centralized que to avoid closing out too many channels at once and overflowing the system.  Another inconvenient fact is that bitcoin's endgame security when block reward hits 0 and LN both might require inflation to work.  Bitcoin still has a lot of extremely complicated issues to work through that most people simply talking about block size don't understand.  Who knows, maybe the issues such as decentralization can't be worked through and it's just a Rube Goldberg machine.



922. Post 18118707 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 09, 2017, 04:31:14 AM
on Exter's pyramid because gold and silver
Exter's pyramid does not include silver. I would think you of all people would know this.

The only purpose of metals is to remove counter party risk while satisfying a few other traits of money such as divisibility, durability, portability, fungibility, etc.  Of all the things we can use as money, the noble metals come out on top to fulfill all the required traits.  Out of the small number of noble metals that exist, only gold, silver, platinum, and paladium can really function well.  Gold was utilized as the main form of money due to corrosion resistance, but more granularity was needed so silver was added.  There's no real point in adding platinum and palladium since they're similar scarcity to gold (no real granularity benefit and just adds more confusion).

The corrosion resistance difference between gold and silver is really meaningless in terms of currency usage, and is offset by the fact that silver doesn't deform as easy in circulation and offers increased granularity.  Gold can't remove counter party risk on it's own, so the extra granularity is needed for the job.  You would likley even have to go a step further and reintroduce copper as well.  There is no real scenario where you would utilize gold and not silver because the entire point of metals is remove counter party risk.

I talked about that more in depth here:  
http://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-vol-8-the-real-fundamentals-involving-gold-silver-and-copper-as-money



923. Post 18119000 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 09, 2017, 05:16:18 AM
And hey, I would fucking love if we went back to using real gold and silver as money. But it's never going to happen again.

Says who?  Your dreams where you think bitcoin is going to $10 million each and metals are going to 0? LOL.  It even seems like some US states are going to pass laws where you don't have to pay capital gains on appreciation of metals as long as they're in the form of US currency (gold and silver eagles, buffalos, etc), because they said converting from one form of US currency to another shouldn't be a taxable event - like changing from 1 dollar to 4 quarters.  If bitcoin did not get this same benefit in tax law in the US it would be screwed trying to compete with metals.



924. Post 18119908 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on March 09, 2017, 07:07:35 AM
it may be possible a delay that may sparkle another weekend bull run.

Just get adamstgBit to do his rally dance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmfE4KAZicY



925. Post 18120322 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on March 09, 2017, 08:05:12 AM
Bitcoin is going to triple its value guys! Its a shme that my account isnt old enough to post the charts as proof, but look at 1-12-2013 and 27-02-2017. Excact same trend. This dump launched a bull run the is going to exist for 3 years if we look at the moving averages! See you at 3k , enjoy !

3k? Adam promised 32k

He promised me 32,000 MB blocks



926. Post 18126242 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 09, 2017, 05:34:19 PM
anti-fragile (colloquial use of the word, FU jbreher).  

Haha - you're destroying yet another word. 'Colloquial' implies 'in widespread use'. The only person I've ever seen use 'anti-fragile' in a consistently inverse manner is you.

If you wish to be understood, you'd be better served by employing words in a manner consistent with their definitions.

And we already went over this.  "Anti-fragile" is a mostly hypothetical word that doesn't really apply to bitcoin at all, yet the word is constantly used to describe bitcoin, so it must have some type of colloquial definition in this context.  You keep trying to claim I invented the use of this word to describe bitcoin when I didn't.  Probably some random guy like Antonopolous started it, but I don't remember.



927. Post 18126584 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on March 09, 2017, 06:22:22 PM
anti-fragile (colloquial use of the word, FU jbreher).  

Haha - you're destroying yet another word. 'Colloquial' implies 'in widespread use'. The only person I've ever seen use 'anti-fragile' in a consistently inverse manner is you.

If you wish to be understood, you'd be better served by employing words in a manner consistent with their definitions.

And we already went over this.  "Anti-fragile" is a mostly hypothetical word that doesn't really apply to bitcoin at all, yet the word is constantly used to describe bitcoin, so it must have some type of colloquial definition in this context.  You keep trying to claim I invented the use of this word to describe bitcoin when I didn't.  Probably some random guy like Antonopolous started it, but I don't remember.

Nassim Nicholas Taleb started it:

https://www.amazon.com/Antifragile-Things-That-Disorder-Incerto/dp/0812979680

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nassim_Nicholas_Taleb

He did not state bitcoin was "anti-fragile", he stated he didn't even understand bitcoin lol.  It was Antonopolous that said bitcoin is anti-fragile:

https://medium.com/@aantonop/anti-fragile-blockchain-39c894613c7e#.ha3zg4ip0



928. Post 18127949 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: york780 on March 09, 2017, 09:15:12 PM
Smiley MOON

ISIS is testing if the honey bader will see it's shadow or not and induce bear market:




929. Post 18128742 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 09, 2017, 10:07:06 PM
Bitcoin can possibly be anti-fragile, because its properties can change in order to make it more robust in the face of setbacks.

So basically you're saying mob rule is anti-fragile and that attribute is somehow a positive thing for bitcoin.  It isn't money in the first place if it just changes at random because it's obviously not fungible then.



930. Post 18141928 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):




931. Post 18142386 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: bitcoinminer42 on March 11, 2017, 01:35:53 AM
Are we rich now?

This is gentlemen




932. Post 18142849 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 11, 2017, 02:46:30 AM
we expected a fair assessment, and they fucked us.

ETF isn't even a good thing for bitcoin.  It's in fact totally pointless for bitcoin to have an ETF.  The only purpose the ETF serves is an exit scheme for the Winklevoss.  Now they have 200,000 coins they need to dump on a bunch of insolvent and illiquid exchanges unless they can find OTC buyers.



933. Post 18143752 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

This declining head and shoulders will probably make it dump again then bounce to $1050 or something:



I'm out again at $1168 (no idea why the price is that high right now) and will let this market marinate.



934. Post 18143925 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on March 11, 2017, 06:12:15 AM
I feel much better again about my bitcoin investment.

Yoda watches over silver bullion to make sure Roger Ver and Luke Jr can't fork it.




935. Post 18150730 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Elwar on March 11, 2017, 03:28:32 PM
One of the critiques was from Professor Bitcorn

That guy doesn't seem to really know much about the technicals or fundamentals of bitcoin, but I actually agree with the ETF decision for a few reasons.  Bitcoin has no transaction finality or even eventual consistency since technically the entire chain can be re-written, and in order to make any claim of being decentralized (unlike Vitalikcoin), that's the way it has to be designed; so bitcoin does not, and probably never will, fit into any existing legal system.



936. Post 18150843 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 11, 2017, 07:29:22 PM
One of the critiques was from Professor Bitcorn

That guy doesn't seem to really know much about the technicals or fundamentals of bitcoin, but I actually agree with the ETF decision for a few reasons.  Bitcoin has no transaction finality or even eventual consistency since technically the entire chain can be re-written, and in order to make any claim of being decentralized (unlike Vitalikcoin), that's the way it has to be designed; so bitcoin does not, and probably never will, fit into any existing legal system.

thats almost like saying company XYZ can't be listed because half of the board can potentially leave to start a competing company, isn't it?

No, the term "consensus" is mostly a common shared delusion that can change into something completely different at any given time, and such a circumstance is not really compatible with a binary outcome legal system.  Bitcoin might also have to become inflationary to maintain any form of convergence after the block reward is gone, so whatever attributes were sold to ETF clients would be on false claims due to bitcoin still evolving as well.  If inflation is required, bitcoin would probably also fork off into all kinds of different chains at that point, from proof of stake to who knows what else.

It is not really written in stone that bitcoin is even a valid system yet, or that it won't be completely different and resemble nothing like how it started.  An ETF is kind of for a finished product without all the uncertainty - another reason I consider bitcoin a currency and not money.  Money doesn't fork.  I don't have to worry about Roger Ver sneaking into my silver or gold coins and forking them into...cheetos or some other unrecognizable molecular structure.



937. Post 18150915 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: infofront on March 11, 2017, 07:45:00 PM
Gotta feel for the Winkles a little bit. I know they are privileged cocks - but they believe in BTC just the same as the rest of us.

Not really, their dollar cost average is something like $100.  Even with these exchanges shallow order books, they can probably still send all their coins to every exchange on the planet and dump simultaneously while walking off into the sunset at a large profit.  I assume they will probably try to dump OTC, though.



938. Post 18151171 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 11, 2017, 08:22:48 PM
Money doesn't fork.
Money forks all the time. It was common practice to dillute gold and silver coins with less valuable metals.

That's not a fork...it's the same thing as shaving.  You can't fork gold and silver you idiots!



939. Post 18151283 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 11, 2017, 08:29:22 PM
Money doesn't fork.
Money forks all the time. It was common practice to dillute gold and silver coins with less valuable metals.

That's not a fork...it's the same thing as shaving.  You can't fork gold and silver you idiots!

you also can't move 30,000$ worth of gold from here to china for a buck.

imagine having to pay deals in gold LMAO!

Imagine opening your borders to global labor arbitrage so that any nation with a population surplus outbids you in everything, forcing you into trillion dollar trade deficits.  Then after a couple years, no matter what you're paying them with, China owns all of it no matter what.  Then you print a new "domestic only" dollar, which then implodes because it's valueless, then you're back to a 3rd world country.

The moral of the story is, exporting all your money, no matter what you use as money, is never a valid choice in the first place.  This is why China forbids exportation of gold.  Just like using hard money prevents your sovereign debt from going out of control, it also acts as a barrier to prevent you from running trade deficits that eventually implode your country.  Everybody notices all the gold and silver getting onto the ship departing to China and usually stops it beforehand.

We will see how long it takes before unilateral action is taken this time:

http://didthesystemcollapse.com/

The only way to make it so they don't want all of it, is to stop manipulating it lower and raise the price so high they consider it overvalued.  Then they'll be happy to take some of your freshly printed Tbills again.



940. Post 18151842 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 11, 2017, 09:23:46 PM
remarkable market is holding this price like a champ.

Price has absolutely no short term upside at all, so it feels like some whales who got stuck on the wrong side of the ETF trade are propping it up in order to then come in with the flash $4-5 million dump on finex and bitstamp while nobody is looking.



941. Post 18151940 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: vortex1878 on March 11, 2017, 10:07:27 PM
remarkable market is holding this price like a champ.

Price has absolutely no short term upside at all, so it feels like some whales who got stuck on the wrong side of the ETF trade are propping it up in order to then come in with the flash $4-5 million dump on finex and bitstamp while nobody is looking.

You are so full of shit. Cheesy
But keep it up till my Fiat arrives on Monday... ^^

Do you know nothing about the bitcoin market?  This entire run that started around $1000 was all predicated on ETF hype.  If you factor in $1200 as the market price of the ETF hype (I don't consider that manipulation squeeze blow off top on ETF day as a real metric of anything), then best case scenario of ETF denial would probably be a 50% retrace to $1100, and worst case a full retrace or dump lower than where it started.  Hence my statement, there is zero upside on price from this point in the short term.



942. Post 18152058 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 11, 2017, 10:18:18 PM
dip buyers:
this dip buying is Cute, but dont expect a magical unicorn to buy it back up over 1350 once your done.

Almost feels like bots are trading like that $1350 number was actually real.



943. Post 18152110 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 11, 2017, 10:32:13 PM
dip buyers:
this dip buying is Cute, but dont expect a magical unicorn to buy it back up over 1350 once your done.

Almost feels like bots are trading like that $1350 number was actually real.
...it was.

It was so real this song began playing right as it happened:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcXV1Pm77h4




944. Post 18152296 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Torque on March 11, 2017, 10:45:07 PM
can't rig the system to allow our crooked wealthy elite overlords to corner the market and screw over the masses"

Except by just printing some fiat, buying a bunch of miners (which isn't decentralized), then keep parlaying the profits of those miners into infinity like every miner already does?  PoW is mostly externalized proof of stake in practice.



945. Post 18152449 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: bones261 on March 11, 2017, 11:16:10 PM
The Hunt brother's tried to do that with the silver market and ended up getting their ass handed to them. Grin

The bankers changed the exchange rules on the Super Hunt Brothers on the fly and basically forced them to liquidate their positions, selling all of their silver instead of buying more.



946. Post 18153052 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Torque on March 12, 2017, 12:57:21 AM
The Hunt brother's tried to do that with the silver market and ended up getting their ass handed to them. Grin

The bankers changed the exchange rules on the Super Hunt Brothers on the fly and basically forced them to liquidate their positions, selling all of their silver instead of buying more.

From what I understand, they were trying to corner the silver market using excessive leverage. The banks changed the rules out of the blue regarding margin, eventually forcing a margin call.

So what have we learned? Welp, that's "regulation" for ya folks. And people really wanted this Bitcoin ETF thing to happen?  Pfff. I think Bitcoin would be better off without "regulation".

This isn't really true.  The Hunt brothers weren't a couple of jews trying to pump and dump silver, they were trying to bring back hard money in general.  They knew the price of silver was manipulated far lower than it should be and tried to break the bank so to speak.  Bankers changed the rules on the fly to liquidate their accounts.  It seems the only people who are allowed to break the bank are guys like...(((George Soros))).



947. Post 18153388 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 12, 2017, 12:28:37 AM
Feels like a big disconnect between trader's "sentiment" and the external market here to me.

I think traders got overly focused (obsessed even) with the wtf ETF because it was 'their thing', Wall St., big bucks, yada yada yada, etc BS. So price has been dominated by trader's sentiment towards ETF thinking since at least mid December .... meanwhile the physical market on the street in India, Japan, China, Asia, Brazil, S. America, UK Europe, USA, etc has been picking up some serious exponential growth steam, look at wallet adoption numbers, s/ware downloads, localbitcoins.com.

Just saying you guys might be missing the woods for the trees. Try not to get run over by the bitcoin moon train when scalping your trading card pennies up off the track ...

You gotta be joking.  The market equilibrium price was $1200 before ETF rejection, so ETF rejection is only a 1.7% drop from the pump price while the ETF pump to go from $1000 to $1200 was a 20% rise?  Yea right.  This market is trading like the DOW right now, artificially levitated.



948. Post 18153724 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Here's an economics problem about bitcoin as a store of value I want to see Marcus and Adam even attempt to address.  The post is a reply to a Nick Szabo quote I don't think is correct:

Quote from: r0ach on March 12, 2017, 03:07:10 AM
Quote
Any commodity that can be stored and so traded can be used as store of value that will render the owner immune from the perceived or actual risks of holding a floating currency.

First of all, just about every currency is a "floating currency" unless the entire supply has been entirely mined from the closed ecosystem and you no longer have to worry about cost of production affecting value.  But even then, you're still governed by people's sentiment for how much they value that object to trade their goods and services for vs bartering with something else.  Everything about the currency is going to be floating in one way or another.

Secondly, bitcoin having a potentially wildly floating cost of production is one of it's greatest weaknesses and one reason it's not a store of value.  A wildly volatile to the downside cost of production is a black swan event in itself and would render confidence in that asset to nothingness.  If we lived in an open ecosystem, which anyone who claims we will be mining asteroids for metals does, then the cost of production and it's ability to not plummet is the main factor that makes gold a store of value at all.  If you live in a closed ecosystem it's not that big of a factor since you're bound by supply.

As for bitcoin, the fact that mining NEVER ENDS is exactly the equivalent of using gold as money while being in an open ecosystem.  If cost of production craters, you're screwed.  This can happen in bitcoin easily.  The act of previous holders just hoarding their money and refusing to sell low doesn't help because the network is officially dead in the first place if there's no mining fees to siphon off at this new lower cost of production, so the fresh lower cost of production coins drag everything else down with it.



949. Post 18154311 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 12, 2017, 03:47:47 AM
Here's an economics problem about bitcoin as a store of value I want to see Marcus and Adam even attempt to address.  The post is a reply to a Nick Szabo quote I don't think is correct:

Quote
Any commodity that can be stored and so traded can be used as store of value that will render the owner immune from the perceived or actual risks of holding a floating currency.

First of all, just about every currency is a "floating currency" unless the entire supply has been entirely mined from the closed ecosystem and you no longer have to worry about cost of production affecting value.  But even then, you're still governed by people's sentiment for how much they value that object to trade their goods and services for vs bartering with something else.  Everything about the currency is going to be floating in one way or another.

Secondly, bitcoin having a potentially wildly floating cost of production is one of it's greatest weaknesses and one reason it's not a store of value.  A wildly volatile to the downside cost of production is a black swan event in itself and would render confidence in that asset to nothingness.  If we lived in an open ecosystem, which anyone who claims we will be mining asteroids for metals does, then the cost of production and it's ability to not plummet is the main factor that makes gold a store of value at all.  If you live in a closed ecosystem it's not that big of a factor since you're bound by supply.

As for bitcoin, the fact that mining NEVER ENDS is exactly the equivalent of using gold as money while being in an open ecosystem.  If cost of production craters, you're screwed.  This can happen in bitcoin easily.  The act of previous holders just hoarding their money and refusing to sell low doesn't help because the network is officially dead in the first place if there's no mining fees to siphon off at this new lower cost of production, so the fresh lower cost of production coins drag everything else down with it.

cost of production has very little effect on price
even if ( for no good reason ) the cost of mining the remaining 9million coins was 0, price would not be affected.
so what if the miner dumps 12.5BTC every 10mins and makes a profit.
its NOTHING compared to the global trading volume, and the market itself dosnt really care about how much or how little the miner is profiting

consider fiat's cost of production and the rate at which the FED prints it and INJECTS it into the economy... yet fiat is still a relatively stable store of value.

You're acting like bitcoin has a finite supply.  In theory it does, but not in practice since transaction fees are recycled and mining continues FOREVER.  It's the equivalent of if platinum costs $1000 an ounce to mine at some point but people are recycling old cars and getting it for $100 an ounce.  The lowest available price is the only one that matters.  It doesn't matter if the cost of production was $1 million for a coin at some point.  It's an open entropy system so if the cost of production goes to zero, people simply plug into the system and mine those recycled coins for free rather than paying you $1 million.  

If there are no recycled fees to mine, it means the system was already dead in the first place.  The act of making fees recycle is the equivalent of infinite supply when a bitcoin is an arbitrary unit in the first place, just with the store of value aspect of that supply resting on cost of production instead of scarcity.  Each halving doubles cost of production, which enables you to increase price or lower mining input.  If you run out of halvings and then lower cost of production, you should have a corresponding effect to devalue other already existing coins.  Do you see now why cost of production actually does matter?

Most people with an IQ of 70 that don't know their head from a hole in the ground call bitcoin a ponzi but have no idea how it even works, yet if you really do understand how it works, it actually does resemble somewhat of a ponzi where arbitrary dates are inserted and proclaimed that on this date, the price must rise if mining input stays the same.  If that's not a "scheme" of some type, then I don't know what is.



950. Post 18161994 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

This market has turned full blown scam. 

Price up 1.6% from pre-ETF decision pump of $1200?  Not down....not even 5% down...but UP instead? LOL.  If there was any exchange on earth besides Bitfinex being the market leader to determine price world-wide, I might let it slide, but we're talking about the second coming of Mt Gox here - an exchange that already appeared to be naked shorting their own customers during the halving, admittedly traded on their own exchange while knowing where all margin positiosn are, probably traded with customer funds too, and then ranomly out of the blue stole something like $70 million of bitcoin from customers. 

Is this a dream?  How does Bitfinex STILL control the world-wide price of bitcoin while being completely insolvent and still owing customers something like $60 million dollars???



951. Post 18162088 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: willope on March 12, 2017, 07:28:35 PM
I can't believe these price movements. Every time I consider selling my coins to wait bear market this happens. Price recovers from the dust. No explications.

LOL, yea, and you should probably start questioning why the price is always led by the most scammy exchange on the planet and how they keep managing to raise the price over and over on zero volume compared to when the price was $400-800. 

I used to trade on Bitfinex but wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole nowadays, yet when I ask in this thread, who the fuck is trading on this scam of an exchange?  Not a single person in this thread says they are.  So the question is, if nobody is actually trading on Bitfinex, what exactly are we looking at here?  Just the exchange owner moving the buy and sell walls around wherever he wants with no actual customers and that determines world-wide bitcoin price?



952. Post 18168132 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: bitserve on March 13, 2017, 05:44:06 AM
I bought a few of these:
http://insidebitcoins.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/cryptosteelfeaturedimgbitcoinist1-640x480.jpg

I'll buy a steel physical private key wallet as soon as someone manages to get bitcoin over 4 TPS.  Until that happens, I'm not sure if it feels right trying to secure Bitcoin against Noah's flood and nuclear attacks.



953. Post 18177257 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 14, 2017, 12:04:35 AM
contentious Miner Activated Hard Fork - MAHF

less than palatable User Activated Soft Fork- UASF is less dangerous

I'm honestly tired of reading this Orwellian nonsense.  Bitcoin was clearly designed with miners controlling the protocol and forks in mind.  Instead of speaking the truth, that there's supposed to be such a large amount of individually acting miners that it's not possible for them all to collude forming a nash equilibrium, and that only win-win policies would be adopted in a non-zero game game, you instead have a failure of bitcoin decentralization where everyone who controls the entire coin can fit into one car.

ASICs and pools destroyed how bitcoin is supposed to function.  It essentially died at that point and people just pretended it didn't ever since and now it's the Chinese Paypal.  This doesn't mean "full nodes" now control bitcoin just because you don't want one car full of Chinamen to control it.  That's not how it works.  Miners will always control it or it's not actually bitcoin.  The fact is, there was a breakdown in the decentralization and Nash equilibrium of bitcoin that has to be addressed.

Decentralization may even be an insoluble problem itself, making this thing a giant fugazi no matter what you do.  I tend to believe that is the case until someone can prove me wrong.  I imagine it would take something extreme like some cutting edge cryptography to let you create decentralized captchas for mining so that it takes active user input to solve blocks - human based mining.  Using energy expenditure to find convergence was never that great of an idea in the first place when energy costs are not even close to uniform across the globe.  It was designed to centralize even without ASICs.

Why do you think I like metals?  Bitcoin is a Ponzi scheme created by *some guy.  Gold and silver are a Ponzi scheme created by *God.



954. Post 18177766 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Biodom on March 14, 2017, 02:12:31 AM
^^^a bout of tautology, perhaps...
by your logic, *some guy surely was created (indirectly) by the same entity that created gold and silver, was he not?
who made stars, included supernova?

The prime mover of the universe is non-uniform distribution of matter and gravity.  For the non-uniform distribution of matter to exist, some type of entropy source had to exist on the other side of the big bang.  *God refers to this unknown entropy source.  It's above my pay grade figuring out how you could derive free will out of the whole thing even with a random seed.  It seems like determinism and causality would persist:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4ThPAW5sd0




955. Post 18190184 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: kurious on March 14, 2017, 02:35:12 PM
Normally, raising interest rates makes a currency stronger.

The only problem with that assumption is that holding fiat cash is still basically the same thing as holding sovereign debt when they can monetize or devalue the debt at any time.  There is no point in holding cash of a nation with a parabolic debt chart because it's obviously not a safety net.  Nobody wants Venezuelan money just because they raise interest rates.

Another thing is that as the USD index increases, most of the world's debt is denominated in USD, so countries who were already insolvent and unable to pay default even faster, causing cascading deflationary collapse to bring down the whole system.  Rising USD index is a systemic risk and there is no scenario in which the USD just magically becomes twice as strong, thus doubling everyone's debts and doubling the amount of goods they have to send to America, without everyone completely boycotting the dollar.  USD index is already up huge since 2014.  The only question is how high can it go before it blows up the system.


Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on March 14, 2017, 06:52:41 PM
Then tell me how things are controlled, because it is always controlled somehow.

The voting mechanism of bitcoin is supposed to be where a Nash equilibrium exists so nobody can collude on any change, so the only changes that can go through are non-zero sum game win/win changes for all.  I would say neither segwit or a block size increase actually fits that description in whole, so if bitcoin was actually functioning as designed, it would likely not morph into either one.  Bitcoin is supposed to be highly resistant to change and both of them have their drawbacks, so how would either go through?  

On the other hand, I don't believe bitcoin has value as a settlement layer because metals act as a far superior store of value and you'd need to get TPS up to something like 5000 where it's not a settlemenet layer to justfiy it's existence.



956. Post 18190732 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: AlexGR on March 15, 2017, 12:12:41 AM
(assuming scaling is solved technologically - which is a certainty over the long run, as processors, storage, networks become better).

I don't think so if you had to do everything on-chain.  You need to get bitcoin to something like 5000 TPS for it to be used as a currency and valued for it's utility instead of a settlement layer, which it's not very good at because bitcoin is a poor store of value compared to metals.  Going the settlement layer route is a recipe for failure in the long run and that's what all on-chain scaling is.



957. Post 18191463 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 15, 2017, 01:16:09 AM
my BU NODE IS BACK UP BITCHES  Grin




958. Post 18203549 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Arcteryx on March 15, 2017, 03:37:30 PM
I always envy the German ingenuity

Let us not forget about Japanese ingenuity as well:




959. Post 18203657 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Torque on March 15, 2017, 05:38:27 PM
Because the shark scammers that PnD'ed Bitcoin in the beginning years have run out of hacks, flaws, DDoS attacks, media-created FUD, etc. to work with. Bitcoin is more rock-solid, distributed, and secure now than it has ever been in its 8 year history. The only thing they have left is to try and divide the community and slow things down.

I consider everything about the bitcoin price a scam until we have an exchange leading the market that is NOT Bitfinex.  There is zero difference in Finex and Gox.  The price could be $20,000 or $2 at any second with this fraud exchange.



960. Post 18203910 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Holliday on March 15, 2017, 11:21:28 PM
because they want to use the best tool for censorship-proof value transfer in the world

If it was censorship proof you could just steal a bunch of bitcoins then simply dump them on Coinbase...but you can't.  Anything that's not fungible is a permissioned ledger by default.



961. Post 18204045 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 15, 2017, 11:31:58 PM
I want to know where to purchase food directly with gold.

Do you think this guy is more likely to accept bitcoin or gold?




962. Post 18204259 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Torque on March 15, 2017, 11:49:50 PM
In Venezuela, definitely bitcoin.

I've already looked up info on Venezuela before.  I expected bitcoin to sell for a premium there...but no..it seems to sell at a loss if anything for the only instances I could find.  Metals seem to have an enormous premium, though.  I also expected lots of cheap real estate deals you could buy using external currency, but nope.  Real estate is actually sky high with shitty houses for high amounts of cash.  People seem to be buying up housing to avoid hyperinflation/currency collapse.



963. Post 18205561 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

I have infiltrated the Chinese trading market:

<fuq> chinese ppl hang pork in the air to dry to make bacon
<fuq> they hang bacon next to their clothes
<fuq> lol
<Ren-CN> lol
<Ren-CN> yes



964. Post 18205788 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: podyx on March 16, 2017, 04:18:23 AM
Are alt coins taking over? What the fuck is going on?

This don't look too good for bitcoin

Nah, the writing was on the wall that with the ETF being rejected, "they" (as MatTheMat refers to) couldn't keep raising it higher and higher and find people to dump their expensive coins on.  What you just discovered is how small and manipulated this entire market really is.  It looks like to me that Digital Currency Group transferred out of BTC and over to Bologniex to pump scamcoins (to find idiots to dump expensive Eth on) and this single entity (including their media outlet mouthpiece Scamdesk) can control the price of all alts at once or if BTC goes up or not.  The bitcoin market is not that big, it's all an illusion.



965. Post 18206873 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Lauda on March 16, 2017, 06:38:38 AM
This is similar to the debate 'vaccines cause autism'. One side has actual data to support their claim that it doesn't, the other has pseudo-science and 1 false research which claims otherwise. Roll Eyes

This is complete bullshit.  Some vaccines are more dangerous than others, like the pertussis vaccine which is known to cause brain swelling aka brain damage, which has been observed in mice and humans.  They bundle this vaccine in with the tetanus shot.  I got bit by a dog and took once and couldn't concentrate to read for like 48-72 hours after taking it.  I'll probably never touch a vaccine again, especially not that one (which is probably the most dangerous one of all).  Then the secondary issue about whether the all the side byproducts in the vaccine like mercury and formaldehyde are bad for you is a whole different issue.  If there is any single vaccine to avoid, it is the pertussis shot.



966. Post 18217060 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: rogerwilco on March 16, 2017, 08:59:37 PM
It'll be a total shitshow. The two warring factions will get coins on both chains, so they'll all start dumping on the chain they don't like while alts take over.

Bullish silver.  Adam can't fork my silver.



967. Post 18217168 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: d5000 on March 17, 2017, 12:16:55 AM
It'll be a total shitshow. The two warring factions will get coins on both chains, so they'll all start dumping on the chain they don't like while alts take over.

This. Bitcoin's dominance is already lower than it's ever been. With a hard fork, at least one alt is bound to surpass its mcap, which will be catastrophic.  Undecided

For now, I don't think that they "take over". There is no real competitor in the top 10 of altcoins. D*sh is instamined and semi-centralized cr*p, ETH is not about payment but more a B2B solution. NEM is the Japanese Bankster Coin (JBC) and has a shady, blockchain-bloat-encouraging algorithm. Monero ... is OK but has even more scalability issues as BTC. Ripple and Byteball are totally centralized. LTC? Don't think so. So there is no real contender but all together could capture 50% of market share - and that would be already a hit for BTC.

Yep, if a hard fork managed to crater BTC, the market cap on all those alts is also going to be 1/2 or less of what they are now.  There is no way in hell I would be holding alts if I thought the price of bitcoin was about to crash to $500-800.



968. Post 18217248 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

A lot of people will probably lose their shirts due to it, but I bet BU trying to fork will end up with a segwit coin with new mining algo in retaliation + Winklevoss and Roger Ver dumping all those coins.  Bitcoin has a hard time moving forward with horrible distribution and centralized mining, so it would be better off in the long term, but short term will be mass rape.



969. Post 18219728 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

It's official:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agwMwbmMNbk



970. Post 18221180 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Lauda on March 17, 2017, 07:26:23 AM
So, what happened?

Quote from: r0ach on March 17, 2017, 07:08:59 AM
Well, congrats to Mat for the MatTheMat reverse indicator working like a champ again.  A call for $1500 was made and now we're looking at a nice $1100 bear market.





971. Post 18229536 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: york780 on March 17, 2017, 10:54:16 PM
Sometimes you need to let go and trade mate.

What about shorting the US debt?

Quote from: r0ach on March 17, 2017, 10:54:16 PM
If you ever thought the debt would not be defaulted on or alternatively devalued by hyperinflation, this mike maloney chart tells you all you need to know about that: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7q-73dpBKo

Alternatively, they can do something like revalue gold at $20,000-$50,000 an ounce, but those are basically the only 3 options.  Places like china + india + russia now own such large amounts of gold they have no incentive to force a gold only standard on people because it would make india too powerful, so they don't really have any reason to try and stop silver from rising too.  The profits are almost mindblowingly unbelievable, but I think you will eventually see something like gold $20,000 silver $600.



972. Post 18243587 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

This event was foreseeable from a mile away.  Me + Adam were both bearish while MatTheCat was bullish.  There has never been a better indicator of where the market is headed than that.


Quote from: r0ach on March 12, 2017, 02:10:03 AM
This market is trading like the DOW right now, artificially levitated.

Quote from: r0ach on March 11, 2017, 10:01:13 PM
Price has absolutely no short term upside at all

Quote from: r0ach on March 11, 2017, 06:00:12 AM
I'm out again at $1168 (no idea why the price is that high right now) and will let this market marinate.

Quote from: r0ach on March 11, 2017, 12:30:51 AM







973. Post 18243858 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 19, 2017, 01:36:44 AM
One thing Woo (and idiot Ver) may not have accounted for is by centralising so much power around themselves they are now major targets for any variant of the $5 wrench attack motivated by an incentive for control over a $20 billion monetary security system (or its demise) .... not smart guys by any stretch of the imagination. They might want to start spending that "$100 millions" they budgeted on attacking core (100's of decentralised developers) on some high class personal security.

You would think Ver knows enough of the cypherpunk history to know what happened to e-Gold, Liberty Reserve, e-Bullion, etc central actors. If you want to go centralised with your digital money expect to become the prime target for some major league criminals.

By that logic, such an attack would have occurred years ago on people like Gavinator, Wlad, or Gmaxwell already...



974. Post 18244005 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: andyatcrux on March 19, 2017, 02:00:05 AM
Both goods points, I was thinking the same thing and wondering if Roger Ver had some form of autism or some other impediment that may be preventing him from seeing the potential risks he is facing by destroying people's wealth; risks up to and including his own demise.

Depends if you believe lightning network will function in a decentralized manner or will be a valid scaling solution in general or not.  If you think it won't, Bitcoin needs around 8MB blocks at minium to be globally relevant as a payment system, and even then transaction fees are gonna be yuge.  It would still be limited to things like realtors or car salesmen doing big transactions, or people transferring something like $10,000 of their bitcoin at a time to a centralized off-chain payment system like the Bitpay Visa.

Such a use case would still only place bitcoin in the status of settlement layer.  I personally believe bitcoin does not function as a store of value, which is inherently required to be a settlement layer.  If people were looking for the base of Exter's pyramid (store of value) you should be looking at gold and silver instead.  Due to this, the price of bitcoin has to be floated by just raw transaction processing numbers aka utility, so huge scaling is imperative to it's price.  

The only way currently known to get that type of scaling is a solution like LN, so it seems like to me that the life and death of Bitcoin may rest on the ability of LN to work or not.



975. Post 18244060 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: AlexGR on March 19, 2017, 02:24:30 AM
https://www.bitcoinunlimited.info/articles

Quote
Article 2: Confederation
...
President: a publicly identified (real-life identity is known) BU Member who is responsible for the ongoing activities of the confederation. The president shall resolve BUIP number conflicts, organize BUIP discussion (in the forum designated by the secretary), and schedule/initiate voting (within the limits specified in these articles).

...you can't make this stuff up. I thought the reddit image might have been tampered or something and went to check myself.

...A president.

...A fucking president.

Is Adam the president?



976. Post 18244515 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Torque on March 19, 2017, 03:38:35 AM
So has anyone here tried Abra yet?

https://www.goabra.com/

Another neat conditioning scheme to get people into a digital only ban on cash slave system.  It's even backed by very fake news CNN.  All apps conveniently phone orientated because women love phones while also being the easiest thing on earth to brainwash since they just follow whatever popular opinion is perceived.  

That's an app for you to invest in currency, not money.  The bankers love the goyim to not know what money even is and to pretend they're gaining some type of wealth by hoarding currency only to then have the rug pulled out from under them.  Why pretend you're amassing wealth and removing counter party risk when you actually can with:




977. Post 18246172 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 19, 2017, 05:18:04 AM
Cheap Moon COINS!!!!!!




978. Post 18255063 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Dafar on March 19, 2017, 04:03:58 PM
I dont think the risk/reward of the situation is reflected at a price of $1000+ right now.

It's not.  I expected the price to do this already without factoring a BU hardfork in at all.  So right now I feel like the market has not priced in any hardfork.  Meaning if no fork occurs, I guess it can hold this position, but if one does happen, it would likely dump:

Quote from: r0ach on March 11, 2017, 06:00:12 AM
This declining head and shoulders will probably make it dump again then bounce to $1050 or something:



I'm out again at $1168 (no idea why the price is that high right now) and will let this market marinate.



979. Post 18255347 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 19, 2017, 09:16:20 PM
bitcoin absolutely must be able to resist "spam attacks" or whatever jargon people cook up next time it happens. Otherwise it is simply not good enough for mass adoption.

Bitcoin and mass adoption?  MatTheCat doesn't even know how to properly set transaction fees to get included into the next block and he's been using bitcoin since 2012.  He kept complaining transactions take 3 hours to get into the next block.  I had to tell him how to do it and I think he still doesn't know how after I told him.  Not to mention the fact normal humans would also have to learn things like RBF and other such peculiarities on top of that, of which they're not really capable.

The only way bitcoin is getting mass adoption is if it functions as the back end of some type of system, but that would likely defeat the entire purpose.  Some entity would just do a switcharoo and change it to a fiat back end while maintaining the same front end (which is what would probably happen with LN eventually).  Metals ownership is only around 3/4th's of 1% of the US population and it requires no technical knowledge.  Metals ownership will likely soar as the economy blows up, but I don't think bitcoin ownership can do better than metals unless it functions as a back end system (which as I said, is probably pointless as a back end).

Any system of bitcoin as a back end will always be used by the state as a scam to trick people into a digital only, ban on cash slave system.  But they can also easily co-opt bitcoin through the legal system, the attack vector of the enormous physical size of mining pools, the fact that network traffic and transactions aren't obfuscated, etc.  It's kind of difficult to beat the state with bitcoin no matter what.  You can hide from the state with metals because they're incapable of surveiling physical space of the entire planet, but they can easily lock down the digital domain.



980. Post 18255499 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 19, 2017, 09:49:59 PM
Now how about you go back and answer the last three questions I asked you.
A higher price is absolutely required if bitcoin is to become anything of lasting importance. This is basic stuff we went over years ago, what the fuck dude?

I guess he forgot the halvings are designed to force a ponzi element where either the price goes up or a large percent of miners go bankrupt.  And then current cost of production always negatively affects previously mined coins if current cost of production goes below cost of production when you bought in if the halving fails to perform it's ponzi magic.  This is why I say the value of bitcoin is based on it's cost of production and not scarcity as I talked about in this post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1442399.msg18167916#msg18167916



981. Post 18256372 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Meuh6879 on March 19, 2017, 11:31:38 PM
Miners are not the majority, they follow the path (of all nodes).

Miners are supposed to represent the Nash equilibrium, so if you say you can't "trust" the miners, all you're really saying is that no nash equilibrium exists and bitcoin was a failed experiment that should not have value in the first place.

Hence my post:

Quote from: r0ach on March 14, 2017, 01:36:47 AM
Bitcoin was clearly designed with miners controlling the protocol and forks in mind.  Instead of speaking the truth, that there's supposed to be such a large amount of individually acting miners that it's not possible for them all to collude forming a nash equilibrium, and that only win-win policies would be adopted in a non-zero game game, you instead have a failure of bitcoin decentralization where everyone who controls the entire coin can fit into one car.

ASICs and pools destroyed how bitcoin is supposed to function.  It essentially died at that point and people just pretended it didn't ever since and now it's the Chinese Paypal.  This doesn't mean "full nodes" now control bitcoin just because you don't want one car full of Chinamen to control it.  That's not how it works.  Miners will always control it or it's not actually bitcoin.  The fact is, there was a breakdown in the decentralization and Nash equilibrium of bitcoin that has to be addressed.

Decentralization may even be an insoluble problem itself, making this thing a giant fugazi no matter what you do.  I tend to believe that is the case until someone can prove me wrong.  I imagine it would take something extreme like some cutting edge cryptography to let you create decentralized captchas for mining so that it takes active user input to solve blocks - human based mining.  Using energy expenditure to find convergence was never that great of an idea in the first place when energy costs are not even close to uniform across the globe.  It was designed to centralize even without ASICs.

Why do you think I like metals?  Bitcoin is a Ponzi scheme created by *some guy.  Gold and silver are a Ponzi scheme created by *God.



982. Post 18256506 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Meuh6879 on March 19, 2017, 11:47:42 PM
That's why full nodes are always a good choice to partipate to the debate.

Full nodes are meaningless to the debate and easily Sybil manufactured.  What is not easily Sybil manipulated?  The longest chain of course.  You can't just change the rules of the game on the fly and pretend miners don't matter when the entire system is based around whatever the longest chain is.  The rules of the game are if you don't like what some miners are doing, you're required to mine harder than them.  If your stance is that a cartel in China has taken control of bitcoin colluding together to control it and no Nash equilibrium exists whatsoever, then you're in the bitcoin has failed camp already in the first place.



983. Post 18256754 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Meuh6879 on March 20, 2017, 12:20:48 AM
when the entire system is based around whatever the longest chain is.

longest chain ... in a max size of 1Mb.

That excuse doesn't work when bitcoin launched with higher than 1MB blocks in the first place so a "bitcoin can never fork" purist doesn't even have a valid reference point to stand on.  The fact is, just about everything regarding bitcoin (and every other cryptocurrency) is completely arbitrary in nature and wide open to rough consensus attack.  There are TWO ethereums.  There could be 100 ethereums tomorrow.  It's pretty much inevitable there will be more than one bitcoin.

This is why it's called a cryptocurrency and not money.  Currencies are arbitrary games that people create, while money does not fork or change.  I don't have to worry about Adam sneaking into my house and trying to fork my gold or silver.  Nobody should even own currency in the first place unless you actively use it or are a forex trader.  90% of this forum are basically acting as forex traders without the skills to do so.  It's also far more common for people holding currencies pretending they're stores of value to get horrifically burned than to profit.



984. Post 18256822 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: RayX12 on March 20, 2017, 12:26:12 AM
Interesting to watch!

"Do miners control consensus? The 5 Consensus Communities | Bitcoin Q&A with Andreas Antonopoulos"

Might as well cut the bullshit and just say whoever puts up the biggest fiat wall controls consensus, meaning no consensus even exists and everything is just a derivative of whoever has the most USD.  The only way for that to change is for bitcoin to become the world unit of account, but that's not actually possible because bitcoin can't defeat gold and silver on Exter's pyramid when metals are a far superior store of value.  Meaning if the USD dies, you will either be transitioned back into another scam currency by the same banking cartel, or the world will use gold and silver as a Schelling point for real money.



985. Post 18256960 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 20, 2017, 12:40:19 AM
... still haven't bought back in yet roach?

I'll wait for that BU dip and the ensuing chaos first.  Should be some good dips to buy on both chains as people like Winklevoss and Ver power dump 200,000 coins at once on the chain they don't like.





986. Post 18257097 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Adam, you need to tell these fools if they're going to fork to skip BU entirely and do just a plain 4MB fork with 8MB possibly to be activated at a future date like a few years from now.  BU isn't a good model and we've already been over this stuff before with Monero.



987. Post 18259710 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 20, 2017, 07:07:02 AM
when the entire system is based around whatever the longest chain is.
longest chain ... in a max size of 1Mb.
That excuse doesn't work when bitcoin launched with higher than 1MB blocks in the first place so a "bitcoin can never fork" purist doesn't even have a valid reference point to stand on.  The fact is, just about everything regarding bitcoin (and every other cryptocurrency) is completely arbitrary in nature and wide open to rough consensus attack.  There are TWO ethereums.  There could be 100 ethereums tomorrow.  It's pretty much inevitable there will be more than one bitcoin.

This is why it's called a cryptocurrency and not money.  Currencies are arbitrary games that people create, while money does not fork or change.  I don't have to worry about Adam sneaking into my house and trying to fork my gold or silver.  Nobody should even own currency in the first place unless you actively use it or are a forex trader.  90% of this forum are basically acting as forex traders without the skills to do so.  It's also far more common for people holding currencies pretending they're stores of value to get horrifically burned than to profit.
We have been over this. Gold and silver coins absolutely can and do fork.

Yes, we did go over this, and claiming gold and silver can "fork" is most idiotic thing I've ever heard.  Someone trying to debase or shave the currency is not "forking".  Calling that "forking" is laughable.  When they tried to do this in Rome, guess what happened?  The silver content of the denarius halved and soldiers just demanded twice as many coins for service, with vendors also demanding twice as many coins for goods.  There is no "fork", the market values the coins by metal content.  

Even if you could manage to trick people by doing this, the metal hasn't forked, it's still sitting there identically to how it was before.  Claiming it forked is like claiming if you have a gold eagle laying on the ground and a dog takes a shit on it that it's composition has changed somehow and is thus forked because something else is laying on top of it.  Two traits required of money are fungibility and durability, so because gold and silver are money, it can always be reconstituted in whole form without issue.



988. Post 18259796 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 20, 2017, 07:39:55 AM
When the king mixes his old solid gold coins with iron you end up with two different kinds of coins, both with his ugly face on them. That's a fork.

Your definition of being able to "fork" elements on the periodic table is accepted by nobody else on earth besides yourself.  You're just making things up as you go.  All you're doing is describing a king trying to force people off a metals content based currency and onto a fiat currency.  Your argument has no point because nothing actually happened to change the metal.  It's still sitting there the same as before, just someone attempted to steal it through debasement.  Debasing is the same thing as shaving - physically removing a quantity.  Nothing about the metal actually "forked".



989. Post 18259895 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

This is fucking hilarious.  Bitfury sues to prevent bitcoin from being un-centralized!  This is why I can't stand bitcoin now.  These idiots even think it's supposed to be centralized.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60ast5/bitfury_george_pledges_to_sue_all_involved_with/




990. Post 18260032 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 20, 2017, 08:04:53 AM
You are literally complaining that bitcoin is so successful than people other than internet nerds are becoming interested. This is Good News™.

Are you the new worst commenter on the forum?  The entire point of bitcoin is "decentralization".  To mine things like gold you have to go through the government itself and get permits and also deal with entities like the EPA, yet even with all that bureaucracy, gold and silver mining is still more decentralized than bitcoin mining is.  This is not a good thing when "decentralization" is it's entire selling point.



991. Post 18260467 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 20, 2017, 08:17:03 AM
You are literally complaining that bitcoin is so successful than people other than internet nerds are becoming interested. This is Good News™.

Are you the new worst commenter on the forum?  The entire point of bitcoin is "decentralization".  To mine things like gold you have to go through the government itself and get permits and also deal with entities like the EPA, yet even with all that bureaucracy, gold and silver mining is still more decentralized than bitcoin mining is.  This is not a good thing when "decentralization" is it's entire selling point.
Welcome to the real world. Other people have Agendas. This was never not going to happen.

Please make a comment that makes some type of sense.  You first said I'm "complaining that others besides internet nerds are interested in bitcoin".  LOL, they are not interested in "bitcoin", they're interested in inserting themselves as middlemen and extracting usury and seigniorage fees from you.  The exact thing that bitcoin is supposed to prevent.  If bitcoin developers themselves can't even mine the coin they develop for and have to pay tribute to some cartel, I'm not sure there is much point in this because this thing has clearly gone off the rails.



992. Post 18283905 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Digital currency, slowly enabling the boiling of frogs in a pot to establish a digital only, cashless slave system:

Quote from: r0ach on March 21, 2017, 11:42:59 PM
Anonymint, I don't know how you can even attempt to defend cryptocurrency with stuff like this:

"Japanese companies wishing to use bitcoins will be expected to pay the equivalent of some $300,000 to adopt bitcoin, and there is no guarantee that they will receive a license, even if they abide by government edicts. "

It's not possible for cryptocurrency to escape government regulation (and co-option by default).  The only way you're escaping the matrix of govt is using physical gold and silver in the real world outside of the digital realm.  How the hell can you claim cryptocurrency is a hedge against govt when they can easily control every aspect about it with barely any overhead?  Nobody can muster the overhead required to prevent people from physically transacting in gold and silver in the real world.  Nothing in the digital space is a hedge against government.



993. Post 18285334 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Price has gone full retard.  The exchange which is usually the highest, GDAX, is $1080.  The exchange which is usually the lowest, BTCE, is $1125.  And ScamFinex and Bitstamp, which are usually the base price, are $1090.



994. Post 18311761 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: rdnkjdi on March 24, 2017, 03:11:58 AM
Time for bitcoin to go back to GPU's  Grin Cheesy

Bitcoin is pointless without general purpose mining hardware available.  People just ignored that fact because they were already invested and didn't want to rock the boat to disturb their investment:

Quote from: r0ach on March 24, 2017, 04:32:05 AM
Energy costs on the globe aren't uniform, so the energy arb game was going to centralize bitcoin already, then adding ASICs on top of that kind of doubled up on that oversight to make it worse.  Decentralization might have been acceptable with only the energy arb game at play, but not when combined with the removal of general purpose mining hardware.




995. Post 18313441 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: spooderman on March 24, 2017, 05:10:22 AM
it's all about decentralisation

without that bitcoin is utterly useless.

Well, on the bright side, if anyone wants to convert their digital rat poison currency to money, both JMBullion and Provident metals accept bitcoin as a payment method for gold and silver now (although the GSR highly favors silver atm):

https://www.jmbullion.com/

https://www.providentmetals.com/



996. Post 18322417 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: BDO_44 on March 25, 2017, 12:16:52 AM
why buy @930? is too much, wait for good price, it will come. after bullmarket comes bearmarket, maybe for 2-3 years

Most normal humans thought if ETF was rejected we would go into a bear market till next having.  Now that it's happened, not sure why anyone is suprised after the price was going up at a 45 degree angle for months and then went completely parabolic.  The real question is, who are the morons buying Ethereum scamcoins thinking they're actually a hedge against BTC?  They aren't.  It's just a Digital Currency group / R3 pump and dump so you're buying at the top of their dump.  Eth was already proven to be a scam months ago and now they're trying to resurrect the scam again.



997. Post 18323213 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on March 24, 2017, 10:06:40 AM
Looking bearish

Quote from: r0ach on March 24, 2017, 08:31:01 AM
digital rat poison



998. Post 18323536 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 25, 2017, 02:44:26 AM
Well, on the bright side, if anyone wants to convert their digital rat poison currency to money, both JMBullion and Provident metals accept bitcoin as a payment method for gold and silver now (although the GSR highly favors silver atm):

https://www.jmbullion.com/

https://www.providentmetals.com/

silvergoldbull also takes bitcoin

It appears they have a Jesus beats the shit out of the Jewish money changers and boots them from the temple 10 oz silver bar:

https://silvergoldbull.com/10-oz-jesus-clears-the-temple-silver-bar#



999. Post 18325032 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: edgar on March 25, 2017, 05:55:26 AM
Well, on the bright side, if anyone wants to convert their digital rat poison currency to money, both JMBullion and Provident metals accept bitcoin as a payment method for gold and silver now (although the GSR highly favors silver atm):

https://www.jmbullion.com/

https://www.providentmetals.com/

silvergoldbull also takes bitcoin

All these metal merchants stick huge premiums over spot and then offer piddly discounts for using ANY form of payment.

scalp much?

The story of silver premiums is a complicated subject.  Generally silver eagles have the highest premiums, but they're also the most liquid and easiest to resell (in the US).  When you resell a 100 oz, kilo, or 10 oz bar, you get spot back, but a lot of local places will not be interested in such large bars like 100 oz ones, or they will offer you less than spot because $2000 bars are harder to move.  

When you resell eagles, you get more than spot back.  I saw a store owner post the other day that he pays $1.50 over spot for BU eagles.  Current spot is $17.77, so that would be $19.27.  Current price for eagles is $20.50, so you would get 94% back if you immediately resell.  Immediately reselling gold usually gets you back something like 96%, but silver has much higher upside potential.  

Bullion dealers have equipment to test bullion, but a lot of local places don't, so a lot of places only want to deal in stuff like govt minted coins that are easier to spot counterfeits such as eagles or maple leafs.  There is also legislation going through the US right now to try and make it so you don't have to pay capital gains on govt minted silver or gold coins.  That's possibly a large advantage eagles will have over normal bullion, an advantage bitcoin does not have.



1000. Post 18325288 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Searing on March 25, 2017, 07:31:58 AM
tulips....

Also, after watching Ethereum, where some R3 banker dirtbags and people like Digital Currency Group control the entire premine, I generally think any market where you can leverage non-existent, make believe assets is just a complete fraud by default.  They can't sell because...they are the entire market...so it's an illiquid asset.  So what do they do?  Just use their giant premine as collateral to leverage the price higher to try and attract momentum traders to buy their toxic asset.  It's an even bigger scam than selling subprime mortgage backed securities.

This is why I say I hope you people bought some physical, tangible items with your moon priced bitcoins, because everything about digital currency trading and price is so heinously fraudulent (as can be seen by 0.1 btc priced darkcoins), that it's all going to come collapsing down in a big way someday.  It's obviously not a store of value when nobody is even putting anything of value on the line in a lot of cases in the first place...leveraging illiquid assets...



1001. Post 18325809 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Lauda on March 25, 2017, 08:38:32 AM
-snip-
This is why I say I hope you people bought some physical, tangible items with your moon priced bitcoins, because everything about digital currency trading and price is so heinously fraudulent (as can be seen by 0.1 btc priced darkcoins), that it's all going to come collapsing down in a big way someday.  It's obviously not a store of value when nobody is even putting anything of value on the line in a lot of cases in the first place...leveraging illiquid assets...
Enough of your nonsense metals propaganda. The market of metals is one of the corruptest and overpriced markets out there. Neither gold nor silver are worth anywhere near what they're priced at right now (don't make me go into diamonds and other crap).

Wrong.  The only way you're getting any non-fraudulent economic system on this planet is by using metals in native coin form just like the old days (not backed currency or banker receipts for metals).  If digital currency was actually a good thing for humanity, dirtbag jewish financiers like Ben Bernanke and Larry Summers wouldn't be cheering for you to use it.  There is no possible positive endgame for it.  A non-fungible token is useless and will always turn into an enslavement grid, and an anonymous coin would likely collapse all 1st world governments into anarchy.  

No such thing as anarchy actually exists though.  There is no defeating "the state".  Anarchy is just a temporary power vacuum to be filled by a strongman and then you have a new state.  Since you're a woman and do not understand things like this.  This is the point in which a man (not a woman, women do not run anything) comes in and just smashes to pieces whatever nonsense anarchy delusional system you think you have and tells you what to do.

You think metals are overpriced yet bitcoin (and every other cryptocurrency) solve absolutely NONE of the decentralization problems they claim to solve?  It's likely an unsolvable problem in the first place.  Bitcoin isn't decentralized, Eth isn't decentralized, none of this shit is decentralized.  The group that created bitcoin most likely already knew this, so you then need to direct your attention as to why someone would try to spread this system if it's an unsolvable problem.  Easy, because this is an OLD STRATEGY, to try and spread liberalism and anarchy into foreign civilizations to destabilize them so that you can then come in and take them over:

Quote from: r0ach on December 25, 2016, 01:51:40 AM
"14. In any State in which there is a bad organization of authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism, I find a new right - to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism."

Quote from: r0ach on December 25, 2016, 01:51:40 AM
"6. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one's party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority. This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been infected with the idea of freedom, SO-CALLED LIBERALISM, and, for the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears; the slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the old already weakened by liberalism."



1002. Post 18325931 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: tk3609 on March 25, 2017, 09:16:26 AM
I just wonder how many of those who were screaming "I'm going to by at 900, just please make it happen" actually bought and are not screaming now "I'm going to by at 780".

Typically you have some whale scammer come in and try to pump the price right after it dumped to hell and back, but right now the charts are kind of damaged to the point where nobody is gonna fall for that scam, so there's not exactly a big rush for anyone to buy.  Those type of illogical scam moves were more common back when the price was like $400, though.  It would dump and then go higher than where it dumped from sheer manipulation.  

The worst case I've ever seen of that is Syscoin on Bologniex.  The price dumped 50% from scammy manipulation then immediately went up like 400% right after.  I was watching it and was just like...wow...fuck these markets.



1003. Post 18326081 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on March 25, 2017, 09:32:35 AM
Manipulators are trying to suppress the price

Lol, what do you expect it to do?  Shoot straight up right after collapsing from $1200?  Is bitcoin the only market where people believe it's not possible to go sideways?  It went sideways for over an entire year before.



1004. Post 18326124 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 25, 2017, 09:35:48 AM
Grow the F up Lauda. This is the real world.

LOL, no kidding.  Marcus usually holds the top position as #1 bitcoin shill, but Lauda is trying awfully hard to topple him and take his place.  Even to the point of claiming gold and silver have no value and bitcoin is the only thing in the universe that is valuable (which Marcus also agrees on lol).

Fucking Lauda on an airplane:






1005. Post 18326536 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: york780 on March 25, 2017, 10:20:26 AM
Please look at Dash and Ethereum

Hey, don't forget:




1006. Post 18326913 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: ImI on March 25, 2017, 11:06:15 AM
Agreed, although I wouldn't say that we need leadership but rather a more clear mechanism of decision making.

1 BTC = 1 VOTE

Congratulations on inventing proof of stake, a closed entropy, non-decentralized system.



1007. Post 18334744 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

^ Rather than "proving" altcoins work, one could just as easily derive that no cryptocurrency actually functions as a store of value, hence it being called a currency and not money.



1008. Post 18334818 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 26, 2017, 02:07:32 AM
this is the titanic nothing can sink this ship

FULL SPEED AHEAD!

Adam the space jew




1009. Post 18339693 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on March 26, 2017, 12:30:37 PM
Whenever bitcoin makes a return, it seems like it has become more powerful than before.

Lol, more powerful or more manipulated?  As we've witnessed with Darkcoin, Ethereum, and now Bitcoin in the last week, something with no intrinsic value that doesn't even really exist except in a metaphysical sense, the price can be literally anything.  Zero? two bazillion dollars? all the same difference.  

We even have some random lunatic on BTCE who thinks it's a good idea to try and prop up a $50 spread over every other exchange and then market buys up to $1050 when the price is $900.  Who the hell are these people setting money on fire on purpose?  Looks like the ASIC mafia stepped in desperate to not let the price break below $900 to ruin their multi-million dollar ASIC fields.



1010. Post 18346859 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on March 27, 2017, 01:10:23 AM
Roger is teaching economics 101 out of his ass. If you're interested:
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/61oycs/substitute_goods/

He's kind of right there.  I always thought if bitcoin doesn't scale and fees go too high transactions would bleed into an altcoin like litecoin.  Then once litecoin fees go to high they would bleed into something else.  At this point cryptocurrency would either be a slow march to the graveyard with continuous fracturing of the ecosystem, or you would end up with regional currencies developing to avoid the overhead of outside ecosystems.  

It's possible the common link between each regional currency would be bitcoin, but it's also possible it would be some fiat note or gold/silver/oil whatever instead.  The common link is what other nations would accept in international trade settlement.  They currently accept useless things like tbills, but most people seem to be pushing towards settling international trade in gold.  If you were the king of a country and selling oil to someone else, would you rather have gold or bitcoin?...

I'd probably want something more than imaginary electrons as payment if I was dumping my country's natural resources on the market.  Bitcoin is similar to fiat paper promises in that regard - an IOU to receive goods or services from someone else at a later date.  It requires another party to honor that contract, which is not legally binding nor even a gentlemen's agreement - just an assumption some random guy is going to give you stuff for it some day.  It takes an actual physical commodity based currency that you can hold in your hand and defend with an AR15 to eleminate that counter party risk.

Someone might not agree to be your slave just because you have a bag of gold, but at least you don't end up with a bag of nothing out of the deal.



1011. Post 18347387 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Paashaas on March 27, 2017, 02:28:59 AM


http://www.dailystormer.com/ratlike-jew-children-gather-to-sing-im-not-white-im-jewish/




1012. Post 18360190 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 28, 2017, 12:51:26 AM
Not looking good I'm sad to say.

There is somewhat of a head and shoulders on the USD Index, which is one reason metals are beginning to surge now.  The dollar looks like it will dump lower and send gold and silver higher.  Ironically, instead of the value of bitcoin decreasing as the USD index skyrocketed over the last couple years, the value of bitcoin has actually tracked the value of the dollar and gone up -  mostly because bitcoin's main function is for Chinese white collar criminals to arb money out of the yuan and into US dollars.  

It will be interesting to see what happens in the market if the dollar begins to decline and Chinese no longer want to arb to US dollars.  It's unknown how that will all play out since every country on earth right now seems to be in a race to the bottom to see who can devalue their currency to zero the fastest to get rid of excess debt, and if everyone devalues at once, nothing actually happens.  They would all need to devalue vs gold and silver at once in order to devalue in unison.  

The real story is that people think bitcoin actually trades on it's own merits when it doesn't.  It's always some type of derivative of something else because it's not the unit of account of anything, nor the base of Exter's pyramid.



1013. Post 18366475 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 28, 2017, 04:04:19 AM
no one's actually running BU.

Another inane ignorant falsehood. I'm running BU. Have been for more than a year.






1014. Post 18385858 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: york780 on March 29, 2017, 08:54:12 AM
Altcoins are going to get rekt.

Putin has spotted silver breaking above the 200 day MA.




1015. Post 18411331 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):




1016. Post 18412864 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Talked to Steve of SRSRocco:




1017. Post 18416762 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Anyone else heard of "FSK" before?  What he wrote in 2007 sounds almost like the prequel to the bitcoin whitepaper heh...and he's a software dev specializing in finance of all things:

http://fskrealityguide.blogspot.com/2007/09/agorist-philosophy-overview.html



1018. Post 18417601 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Jim Rogers decides to increase the doom.  The level of doom is probably not very conducive to the survival of bitcoin, though:




1019. Post 18426068 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Jim Rickards says "climate change" is just a made up trojan horse for the jews to try and impose global govt (aka global usury slave system):

https://youtu.be/1nxdsabMYI0?t=1262



1020. Post 18426508 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

And someone didn't want to accept my statement that bitcoin is a currency and not money so I had to explain in greater detail why:

Quote from: r0ach on April 02, 2017, 11:45:38 AM
Bitcoin is a currency not money.  If you don't agree, YOU don't understand finance.  It's a Rube Goldberg machine and nothing more.  No random bullshit made up of completely arbitary variables created by humans is money.  Money represents goods and services or the ability to do work.  It's required to be connected to some type of commodity or energy resource if you're abstracting the system away from barter, otherwise the system is easily gamed and implodes as always.

Bitcoin is not a real commodity, it's a poor immitation like some type of tranny.  The sunk cost in so called "creating" a bitcoin in the past does not transfer into delivering anything tangible into the future.  It's more like a steady state system that can catastrophically fail and vaporize all imaginary "wealth" attached to it at any time - the glaring trait of all currencies past and future.  One of the main reasons the noble metals are valued as money (gold and silver) are the anti-corrosive properties to defeat time itself, which guarantees you the ability to transfer that unit of account from the past to future, UNLIKE bitcoin.



1021. Post 18427704 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Miz4r on April 02, 2017, 12:29:09 PM
And someone didn't want to accept my statement that bitcoin is a currency and not money so I had to explain in greater detail why:

Bitcoin is a currency not money.  If you don't agree, YOU don't understand finance.  It's a Rube Goldberg machine and nothing more.  No random bullshit made up of completely arbitary variables created by humans is money.  Money represents goods and services or the ability to do work.  It's required to be connected to some type of commodity or energy resource if you're abstracting the system away from barter, otherwise the system is easily gamed and implodes as always.

Bitcoin is not a real commodity, it's a poor immitation like some type of tranny.  The sunk cost in so called "creating" a bitcoin in the past does not transfer into delivering anything tangible into the future.  It's more like a steady state system that can catastrophically fail and vaporize all imaginary "wealth" attached to it at any time - the glaring trait of all currencies past and future.  One of the main reasons the noble metals are valued as money (gold and silver) are the anti-corrosive properties to defeat time itself, which guarantees you the ability to transfer that unit of account from the past to future, UNLIKE bitcoin.

Too bad you don't understand money yourself r0ach. The wealth attached to gold and silver is no more or less real than the wealth attached to Bitcoin. It could vaporize just as easily once enough people discover that gold and silver is completely outdated as a form of money and they are really nothing more than shiny rocks that are way too cumbersome to use and represent value in the modern digital world. Good luck living in the past with your useless heap of rocks, I prefer to embrace the future with Bitcoin as money instead. Cool

Completely wrong and you know you're a bullshit artist already.  There was absolutely zero reasoning in that response.  It was just blah blah metals are a barbarous relic and bitcoin is "da future!" but I can't explain why, it just is for no reason!  Because I'm an idiot hipster in a digital hipster world, and bitcoin is digital therefore it's good!  Yea, and fiat notes are digital too, go load up and see what happens.  

Money has NUMEROUS different traits that have to be satisfied, and the only trait being so called "digital" helps is it's portability.  Congratulations, you have exceled at around 10% of the required traits.  Bitcoin is a currency and not money.  Just because being digital allows you to dump it fast (portability), does not make it money or superior to anything else.



1022. Post 18464259 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: gentlemand on April 04, 2017, 08:19:26 PM
When you become a stone cold trading psycho, that's when the real profits roll in.




1023. Post 18474599 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

http://www.trueactivist.com/dutch-media-cancels-dr-phil-show-after-exposing-elite-pedophilia-ring/



1024. Post 18487715 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Well, let's see what happened today.  Trump let the (((deep state))) aka jewish bankers and media boot Steve Bannon and launch another Zionist war in the middle east.  Steve Bannon responds:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/04/06/steve-bannon-calls-jared-kushner-a-cuck-and-globalist-behind-his-back.html

Then the price of bitcoin goes up $20 from some random pumper trying to get people to make believe that bitcoin is something you would want to be holding during a war (lol?).  Then the price of gold goes ballistic making shilling ass Martin Armstrong look like a complete idiot:




1025. Post 18487886 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Paashaas on April 07, 2017, 02:29:10 AM

I wonder how Russia reacts with that attack? Russia'n leaders are assholes they are ok with that disgusting poison gas attack... Angry

There is no Assad launched "chemical attack".  He's not a fucking idiot.  He knows the (((deep state))) and the UN are itching to invade him and would give no excuse for them to do so.  Who were the first people to report it?  The Jews in Israel of course.  The same pepole whose intelligence unit, the mossad, has the official slogan of "BY WAY OF DECEPTION".  It's another gulf war con job by the Jews claiming "look, weapons of mass destruction!".  

There was a fraudulent false flag attack in Russia days before trying to soften up Russian public opinion to go fight some Arabs.  Israel's make believe cult mythology also tells them that they own 2/3rds of Syria:




1026. Post 18488537 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Elwar on April 07, 2017, 04:01:10 AM
Watching the videos of kids who just got hit by gas I was wondering how in the hell the camera man was there so soon after the attack and why wasn't he helping the kid instead of filming him gasping for air.

Probably because:

"The very Jews who lied about Iraq have returned for a sequel as Semitic and unpopular as Zoolander 2"

Ron Paul and tons of others have already come out and called it a "false flag" attack:

http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/false-flag-ron-paul-says-syrian-chemical-attack-makes-no-sense



1027. Post 18489505 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Elwar on April 07, 2017, 05:20:35 AM
I wouldn't be surprised if it was a false flag.

Wouldn't be surprised?  This has been going on for how many eons now?




1028. Post 18490594 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on April 07, 2017, 07:28:03 AM
My thoughts exactly. Have to agree with the roach on this one - I find it likely this was a false flag.

It turns out r0ach wasn't the only one who was right:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFIuATI0558



1029. Post 18491274 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Found the smoking gun, a news story from 2013 that they have now deleted but can still be found using the wayback machine archive:

http://web.archive.org/web/20130129213824/http:/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html




1030. Post 18493955 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: iikun on April 07, 2017, 12:14:15 PM
It's actually cheaper in the end to pay cash and keep BTC for other things such as speculation

Bitcoin:  a peer to peer currency speculation system.



1031. Post 18510918 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on April 08, 2017, 04:24:02 AM
( yes bitcoin's blockchain has an asset layer, you didnt know?   Cheesy)




1032. Post 18515616 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on April 09, 2017, 04:35:44 AM
https://blockchain.info/blocks






1033. Post 18527690 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Torque on April 09, 2017, 04:47:32 PM
Bitcoin rises again as more alts crash.

There is honestly nowhere for bitcoin to go without scalability.  Bitcoin is a currency, not money.  Low scalability is counterintuitive to how a currency functions.  A currency's value is entirely derived from flow not stock.  Bitcoin does not have value as a settlement network because being a store of value is the main required trait of a settlement system and there are FAR SUPERIOR stores of value that exist like gold and silver.  

The only question is at what transaction fee does it become mostly a settlement system and create a huge roadblock.  I think it will hit a hard wall around $1-$2 transaction fees, but it's possible black market actors like drug dealers can bear higher fees, so who knows when the wall will be hit, but for the general public, I'm guessing $1-2.



1034. Post 18530298 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: becoin on April 10, 2017, 09:56:08 AM
There is honestly nowhere for bitcoin to go without scalability.  Bitcoin is a currency, not money.  Low scalability is counterintuitive to how a currency functions.  A currency's value is entirely derived from flow not stock.  Bitcoin does not have value as a settlement network because being a store of value is the main required trait of a settlement system and there are FAR SUPERIOR stores of value that exist like gold and silver.  

I think you're just pissed off that the price of bitcoin goes up while the price of gold and silver is stagnating.

Silver isn't stagnating, there's only 29 million registered ounces of silver for delivery on Comex and over ONE BILLION ounces in open interest with the highest amount of naked shorts ever seen in world history.  The paper price is completely divorced from reality.  This is why I buy it.  For anyone who wants to make money, the second you see someone manipulating the price of an asset downwards, you buy.  Whenever you see an asset artifically inflated (bitcoin), you sell.  It would only take $536 million to wipe out the Comex silver market right now - the price of a single F22.  Even the Winklevoss alone could almost wipe them out by dumping their bitcoin for silver.

The more I see the ESF/BIS attempt to rig the metals market downward - like last Friday with the most obvious manipulation ever seen - while allowing bitcoin to rise, the more it tells me bitcoin is not the place to be.  It tells me that the bankers WANT you to be in bitcoin because it's a rat trap.  They want to force you into a digital only currency.  You're doing them a favor by buying it.  They can easily come in and co-opt it via the legal system and the attack vector of exchanges and mining pools afterwards.

If bitcoin was actually a threat to bankers they would be coming at it with the same force as they do silver like this chart, but they don't try to stop bitcoin at all!  The last fucking thing I'm gonna do is allow international banking jews to herd me around into worthless assets to try and prevent the goyim from having access to real wealth.  Bitcoin is just a currency, not money.  That's why it's called cryptocurrency.  Gold and silver are money.




1035. Post 18532662 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: edgar on April 10, 2017, 01:27:57 PM
silver down 35-50c =/= the most obvious manipulation ever seen?

Yes, it happened in the face of all fundamentals pointing it upwards with shit jobs report and Trump starting wars.  There's even people on mainstream media now talking about the BIS rigging the market:

http://www.silverdoctors.com/gold/gold-news/chris-powell-reveals-the-primary-actors-in-the-gold-market/






1036. Post 18533041 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: TrumpD on April 10, 2017, 02:14:44 PM
Gold and Silver respond to economic uncertainty more than anything. Now that people have gotten used to the "new normal" prices will be flat or recede. The next climb will be triggered by the next economic crisis, be it no one purchasing treasury notes, or rapid inflation, if that occurs. Otherwise, it's the long slide down.

Worst hypothesis ever.  "Metals to 0 unless economic uncertainty".  If that's the case, bitcoin must be headed below 0 since it's a currency and not money that provides no utility above competing digital currencies like USD or airline miles.  The fed also targets a 2% inflation rate, but real inflation is usually vastly higher, and metals tend to have something like 1% inflation.  We also just hit peak gold and silver recently, but mining was just an excess energy arbitrage game in the first place, and energy return on investment for fossil fuels is now cratering causing all the oil companies to bankrupt.  

So, both raw supply of metals and the energy arb game are now going up in smoke, which is going to put some extreme scarcity on new supply.  Most metals still in the ground are gonna forever stay there in the near future in other words.



1037. Post 18533279 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Johnny00 on April 10, 2017, 02:35:30 PM
Gold and Silver respond to economic uncertainty more than anything. Now that people have gotten used to the "new normal" prices will be flat or recede. The next climb will be triggered by the next economic crisis, be it no one purchasing treasury notes, or rapid inflation, if that occurs. Otherwise, it's the long slide down.

Worst hypothesis ever.  "Metals to 0 unless economic uncertainty".  If that's the case, bitcoin must be headed below 0 since it's a currency and not money that provides no utility above competing digital currencies like USD or airline miles.

How does Gold and silver offer utility. Remember they were used as a currency before and also governments no longer use gold as a backing for their currency. There is actually zero use for gold. Silver does have real applications.

Because there are various traits required for something to function as money, and the noble metals are the #1 best thing humans have found for the task so far, and of the noble metals, only gold and silver really have use for that purpose.  There are some SERIOUSLY delusional people on this forum.  You do not ask the question "how do gold and silver compete with bitcoin?".  That's a question some type of idiot millenial child would ask.  

Metals are the best standard of money humans have found so far.  The question you ask is "how does bitcoin compete with metals?", and the answer is, it doesn't.  Bitcoin is not even fungible.  Claiming it's better than metals is a joke when it doesn't even have the required traits of money in the first place.  If you own the private key you don't really even own the bitcoin because bitcoin has numerous external dependencies creating vast amounts of counter party risk.  

That and the fact that any non-fungible token is a permissioned ledger by default, which is why the bankers want you to use it and don't attempt to stop it.  I also already explained why bitcoin does not function as a store of value here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1442399.msg18167916#msg18167916



1038. Post 18548016 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Gold up 1.1%, silver up 1.7%, bitcoin up 6/10th's of 1% on the "Trump's war on humanity" trade.  

The fact that bitcoin is rising less than metals means either:

1)  The price is mostly peaked out for it's current state in time

or

2)  There is no reason for bitcoin to be going up on war news because it's completely idiotic to be holding bitcoin during a war and there's just some random scheming pumper (bitfinex owners) trying to raise the price on events that should have no effect on the bitcoin market at all.



1039. Post 18586681 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

This market is flat out fraud.  $30 spread between Finex and Bitstamp.  Since we all know Bitfinex is an insolvent exchange that trades against it's own customers and also steals their money, I'm guessing that spread is also propped up by non-existent money just like Gox.  Why are people willing to put up a $2 million buy wall on Bitfinex but no other exchange to try and prop up price?  Because Bitfinex probably isn't even using real money, just imaginary exchange digits.  

I've been saying BitFinex is the new Gox forever and here it is.  There is no valid price of bitcoin as long as Bitfinex is the market maker.

The current chart looks like shit and is forming a down channel and you got fraudsters on Bitfinex trying to manipulate it up with imaginary money that probably doesn't exist:




1040. Post 18587069 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Wekkel on April 14, 2017, 02:12:21 PM
Looks legit




1041. Post 18587152 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

$41 spread between Finex and Bitstamp now.  While large spreads can happen in bull runs, they do not happen in times like this right now.  There is some major fraud going on at that exchange.



1042. Post 18587264 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: york780 on April 14, 2017, 02:32:07 PM
meanwhile: bitstamp:  1097 EUR  vs Bitfinex : 1143 EUR.  Shocked Shocked Shocked

This is not an arb opportunity, it's a get your money the hell outta Finex before they steal it again opportunity.  Absolutely nothing happened to them the first time they stole millions of dollars.  Why not trade against their own customers some more and just steal it all again if they come out on the wrong side of the trade?

In case anyone forgot the first Bitfinex scam:

https://steemit.com/news/@r0achtheunsavory/bitfinex-is-lying-about-the-hack-and-i-can-tell-you-exactly-what-likely-happened



1043. Post 18587315 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: york780 on April 14, 2017, 02:38:20 PM
huge buy orders scams at bitfinex



1044. Post 18590464 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Shankara on April 14, 2017, 06:57:47 PM
$200 dollars gap between some of main exchanges(okcoin- finex)

this is madness

We all already knew Finex was backed by fraud and just about any Chinese monetary instrument is fraud^2.  One of the exchange owners is probably naked long by millions of dollars while the other is naked short millions of dollars.



1045. Post 18599937 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: becoin on April 15, 2017, 12:03:03 PM
Bitcoin Domination

dominating the ALTs ... Huh ... that's not the trend for 2017 ... trend is BTC is the high-end chip, for institutional players.  ALTs are going to be the fast money, moving TX, at street level.

Pump and dump highly centralized tokens aren't suitable to be used as money at street level.

If any "coin" is used at street level, it's going to be a govt issued digital slave token or silver and copper.



1046. Post 18600166 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: york780 on April 15, 2017, 02:28:13 PM
BTC isnt money tho ^^ its a store of value.

Nothing could be further from the truth.  Bitcoin is a currency, not money.  It's not a store of value.  I already explained why:

Quote from: r0ach on March 12, 2017, 05:12:32 AM
You're acting like bitcoin has a finite supply.  In theory it does, but not in practice since transaction fees are recycled and mining continues FOREVER.  It's the equivalent of if platinum costs $1000 an ounce to mine at some point but people are recycling old cars and getting it for $100 an ounce.  The lowest available price is the only one that matters.  It doesn't matter if the cost of production was $1 million for a coin at some point. It's an open entropy system so if the cost of production goes to zero, people simply plug into the system and mine those recycled coins for free rather than paying you $1 million.  

If there are no recycled fees to mine, it means the system was already dead in the first place.  The act of making fees recycle is the equivalent of infinite supply, just with the store of value aspect of that supply resting on cost of production instead of scarcity.  Each halving doubles cost of production, which enables you to increase price or lower mining input.  If you run out of halvings and then lower cost of production, you should have a corresponding effect to devalue other already existing coins.  Do you see now why cost of production actually does matter?

The thing is designed as some type of scheme where you need infinitely increasing cost of production to prevent it from imploding.  Speaking of schemes, the people running Bitfinex are back putting up big walls with money that doesn't even exist again.  Just Gox dollars in their internal system:




1047. Post 18611140 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

$46 spread between Finex and Bitstamp.  I'm feeling a new Gox-like scandal incoming for Bitfinex.  Nobody should have been allowing that crooked exchange to lead the market in the first place.



1048. Post 18611232 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: MirkoIta on April 16, 2017, 12:44:11 PM
Except for the fact that they fucked up both 1broker and bitmex customers. Luckily for them their losses are going to be compensated by the owner from their pockets.

If you're trading on a bucketshop, the term "victim" is usually more applicable than "customer".



1049. Post 18616271 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Right now is honestly the worst I've ever seen bitcoin chart-wise.  The 6 month chart is a down channel about to drive off a cliff as I already posted:

Quote from: r0ach on April 14, 2017, 01:43:00 PM


And the short term chart is a head and shoulders forming (at least on Finex):



While you also have some enormous Gox-like spread between Finex and other exchanges.  Not sure why anyone would be holding right now.  There's just a few manipulators trying to rig the market up because it's too illiquid for them to dump their entire $10 million+ stash all at once.  

These whales like Digital Currency Group know they're trapped because they can't just parlay the money over to Ethereum since they know the price of that worthless scamcoin is already far too high for anyone to want to buy it from them.  Increasing the price of Eth just gets them trapped even more.  About the only move for them left is either dump BTC for fiat and flash crash it, or transfer funds to Bologniex and try to segwit pump Litecoin.

Quote from: MatTheCat on November 15, 2015, 02:51:41 PM
the splashes of the whales have frozen me in my tracks





1050. Post 18625599 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on April 17, 2017, 05:00:37 AM
i am a native C++ programmer

WE CAN OFFER YOU what you have been promised  

Everything...you say?




1051. Post 18626691 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Lol, what a scam.  No, sorry Bitfinex owners, nobody is going to follow a fake pump on your fraud exchange when you already have more than a $40 spread with other exchanges.  People aren't stupid.  That price went straight up then straight back down.  Fuck off Bitfinex scammers.  This is complete MtGox style fraud.  No legit market pumps using a $40 spread as a BASE LOL.  These people are delusional frauding idiots.



1052. Post 18629096 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Bitfinex scammers have a $65 spread with Bitstamp and GDAX now.  Pure fraud.  I wouldn't put it past those people to claim their banking deposits and withdrawals were shut down by the banks solely to try and force people to buy high priced bitcoins in order to withdraw.



1053. Post 18642160 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

This is the scammiest market I've ever seen in my life.  $60 spreads while people pretend it's perfectly normal with no fraud at play.  I think someone from Bitfinex is going to jail eventually, or will just disappear into the sunset never to be seen again with all the cash, Big Vern Cryptsy style.



1054. Post 18647469 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: york780 on April 18, 2017, 07:25:27 PM
Watching Bitfinex exitpump with music like this : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZkTh_T75QY&index=20&list=RDnBhpiUFSYWI

Love to be in this btc world.

That's not the Bitfinex theme song.  This is the Bitfinex theme song:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcXV1Pm77h4



1055. Post 18654632 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: harrymmmm on April 19, 2017, 03:35:27 AM
Lol.
Gold bugs panic (in the comments) when mike maloney says there's a place in the prepper's portfolio for bitcoin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCPeQyA_jug

Take that with a grain of salt because people like Mike Maloney, Peter Schiff, Steve St. Angelo (SRSRocco), Bix Weir, and most of these people you find in metals know barely anything about bitcoin.  I've talked to several of them before.  Most of them have a small amount "just in case" as a hedge and that's about all their relation to bitcoin is.  Bitcoin also seems to have done a great job of advertising itself as having no drawbacks whatsover and is kind of getting by with false information at this point in regards to things like decentralization when no Nash equilibrium even exists.  

Nobody in metals dives into any issues like that, or the various selfish miner attacks, rough consensus attacks, failure of convergence without a block reward, ASICboost, LN routing, Chinese cartels, amongst millions of other issues in bitcoin.  Most people buying bitcoin today seem to not know any of the problems surrounding it at all and think it's some perfect system designed by god and would go to infinite dollars assuming the state wasn't in the way.

Or, the realization creating a "decentralized" currency is probably not even possible without the ability to make something like decentralized captchas where mining requires manual human intervention, otherwise it's just externalized proof of stake in practice - a Rube Goldberg machine that doesn't solve anything.  If you can extract money from people simply by amassing a large amount of capital and using that advantage against them making it where they can't compete or they're forced to buy from you, that's called rent seeking usury, not decentralization.



1056. Post 18675412 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Paashaas on April 20, 2017, 04:55:23 PM
$1320 on Finex  Shocked  I'm a bit speechless now, this will not end up well.

No kidding.  For the last eon Huobi has generally been the price leader and it's currently $1055 in yuan equivalent there and $983 USD spot in China.  Literally a...$300 spread.  To top it all off, you would think that with Bitfinex being in the process of Goxing they would tone down their fraud levels some at least for appearance sake, but nope, they've actually ratcheted the fraud levels upwards with Finex owners doing some big non-aggregate market pump while also freezing all deposits and withdrawals at the same time.  It's literally an organized crime syndicate at this point.



1057. Post 18675714 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

That's the other thing I don't understand.  Nobody in this thread seems to be worried at all about the complete collapse of interest/trading/price in China.  If China fails to be market leader simply by turning off wash trading, and then falls significantly behind the west in price on top of that, it kinda indicates the entire price was just being propped up by fraud in the first place.  They don't call the Chinese the Jews of Asia for nothing.  They're one of the only groups on earth who can compete toe to toe vs the heebs in financial fraud.



1058. Post 18689056 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on April 21, 2017, 07:01:38 PM
Bitcoin is neither over-bought nor overvalued.

If the purpose of bitcoin is to be decentralized, then it's value should probably be zero due to the following:

Quote from: r0ach on April 19, 2017, 12:42:45 PM
creating a "decentralized" currency is probably not even possible without the ability to make something like decentralized captchas where mining requires manual human intervention, otherwise it's just externalized proof of stake in practice - a Rube Goldberg machine that doesn't solve anything.  If you can extract money from people simply by amassing a large amount of capital and using that advantage against them making it where they can't compete or they're forced to buy from you, that's called rent seeking usury, not decentralization.

This then goes back to the Warren Buffet argument about gold where he claims it's stupid for economics to be dictated by people digging something up from the ground then putting it back into the ground again (vault).  It would be kind of the same with decentralized captchas/puzzles - people mindlessly staring at a screen all day doing nothing productive except solving a captcha for money.  In both cases (gold mining and captcha based bitcoin mining) you're spending time and resources in a mostly unproductive pursuit.  

Current ASIC Bitcoin mining puts this process on cruise control, but the mere fact that it's on cruise control means it's just plain old rent seeking usury in practice and solves nothing in terms of economic monopoly.  Bitcoin is currently designed as a usury system for men to have control of other men as slaves.  It's externalized proof of stake - a closed entropy system in practice PRETENDING to be open entropy.



1059. Post 18694495 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Qartada on April 22, 2017, 10:39:47 AM
Bitcoin is neither over-bought nor overvalued.

If the purpose of bitcoin is to be decentralized, then it's value should probably be zero due to the following:

creating a "decentralized" currency is probably not even possible without the ability to make something like decentralized captchas where mining requires manual human intervention, otherwise it's just externalized proof of stake in practice - a Rube Goldberg machine that doesn't solve anything.  If you can extract money from people simply by amassing a large amount of capital and using that advantage against them making it where they can't compete or they're forced to buy from you, that's called rent seeking usury, not decentralization.

This then goes back to the Warren Buffet argument about gold where he claims it's stupid for economics to be dictated by people digging something up from the ground then putting it back into the ground again (vault).  It would be kind of the same with decentralized captchas/puzzles - people mindlessly staring at a screen all day doing nothing productive except solving a captcha for money.  In both cases (gold mining and captcha based bitcoin mining) you're spending time and resources in a mostly unproductive pursuit.  

Current ASIC Bitcoin mining puts this process on cruise control, but the mere fact that it's on cruise control means it's just plain old rent seeking usury in practice and solves nothing in terms of economic monopoly.  Bitcoin is currently designed as a usury system for men to have control of other men as slaves.  It's externalized proof of stake - a closed entropy system in practice PRETENDING to be open entropy.
It's not stupid for economics to be dictated by an asset.  That's just protection against an inflationary currency.

Gold is dictated by its value as a scarce resource - with fiat currency, any amount of it could be created at any time, whereas with gold, the supply is moderately predictable which rightly gives people a sense of stability.

Bitcoin is similar, while also being decentralised which gives it intrinsic value as a safe digital asset, as well as having additional benefits like being infinitely divisible and safer to hold as it can't be directly stolen if you store it properly.

Claiming bitcoin is decentralized is a joke at this point when not even bitcoin developers themselves can mine it.  Do they lack the technical capabilities to do so?  No, the situation is obviously just how I stated it.  They are capital constrained because bitcoin is just externalized proof of stake - a rent seeking usury system pretending to be open entropy but is really closed entropy in practice.  

Bitcoin solves no economic monopoly problems in current state.  It's actually designed to trend towards monopoly.  The only somewhat positive thing it does is attempt to provide a check against government printing, but bitcoin probably doesn't have convergence without a block reward and might need to fork to inflation anyway.  There's really nothing bitcoin does better than gold and silver at this point besides the ability to dump it faster.

But everybody already knows bitcoin doesn't work the way salesmen like Antonopolous claim it does, so without further ado, you can stop watching Antonopolous propaganda and view the full one hour Richard Spencer Q&A at Auburn Univ:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1JJA6UiEio



1060. Post 18697355 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: harrymmmm on April 22, 2017, 03:21:31 PM

But everybody already knows bitcoin doesn't work the way salesmen like Antonopolous claim it does, so without further ado, you can stop watching Antonopolous propaganda and view the full one hour Richard Spencer Q&A at Auburn Univ:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1JJA6UiEio

Just so noone else wastes their time scanning thru this video, it contains NO mention of bitcoin at any point.

There was a mention of the Mises institute.




1061. Post 18728534 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: noobtrader on April 24, 2017, 05:19:11 PM
i have to admit that i sold some, but profit is profit and now i have zero risk.  Wink

Even the highly manipulated (to the downside) metals market looks less scammy than Bitcoin at this point:




1062. Post 18781367 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: unknown04 on April 28, 2017, 01:39:22 AM
I have a feeling that bitcoin will go up to 1400... what do you guys think ?

I have a feeling you need to be mentally insane to buy bitcoin with a $300 spread with China and $100 spread between ScamFinex and everywhere else.  You see Adam pop in and out of here cheerleading the carnage but you know damn well he's not buying right now lol.  This market is a trainwreck.  What the hell am I even looking at?  A $20-$25 spread used to mean "welp, that's it for this pump, time for the crash".  Now it's just Bernie Madoff/Gox style scam spreads everywhere and people don't even seem to care.

Can't wait to see what excuse the exchanges come up with when this thing blows up:







1063. Post 18791315 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 28, 2017, 06:43:54 PM
There's always only one winner in crypto, sooner or later a good performing altcoin gets dumped to shit & they dive straight back into bitcoin. It's crypto law Grin

I don't really care if an altcoin beats bitcoin as long as it's not R3 banker scamcoin Ethereum or Ripple.  I mean, face it, Litecoin...is bitcoin...just with a different name.  If Litecoin adopts segwit (which it just did with full consensus now), and they make it work there and bitcoin never adopts it, then uh...why hold bitcoin?  Bitcoin is a currency and not money so it's value is entirely based on transaction flow.  

Scaling is vital for any cryptocurrency to not die, otherwise it's a roach motel where you put your money in and it never comes out.  The people who just hoard bitcoins while pretending it's the same thing as gold will eventually get financially destroyed in the long run assuming it doesn't scale.  I personally do not see any current cryptocurrency as actually being decentralized, but if you're going to pretend to be decentralized, you might as well pretend to do so while scaling...until they all go to zero when everyone figures out not only are none of them decentralized, most are made to centralize by design into a rent seeking usury system where the transaction validators are your new slumlords to extort you.



1064. Post 18812591 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on April 29, 2017, 12:59:49 AM
feels like might be some incoming ... alts going nutz, bitfinex price gap closing up, funds are on the move.

The only alt that has any upside potential left right now is Litecoin.  Both Eth and Ripple were raised by the scam of creating coins out of thin air, sending them to Bologniex, then margin leveraging their illiquid asset higher.  I think Darkcoin preminers conspired together to do the same thing.  Now all those coins are in bubble territory with no room to run anymore and about the only alt I can imagine making a move is Litecoin going to something like .02 - 0.04.



1065. Post 18813065 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Nagadota on April 30, 2017, 05:25:55 PM
and since Bitcoin has a more predictable supply than Ethereum it can be used as the ideal store of value.

Well, that's where he's completely wrong because no cryptocurrency is a store of value.  It's a currency, not money.  It even says "Cryptocurrency" in the title.  Currencies are never a store of value.  The only thing that gives them value is transaction flow, which is determined by scalability and pushing through millions of cups of coffee, contrary to what people claim where coffee is the bitcoin anti-christ.  Noble metals such as gold and silver are absurdly better at being a store of value (i.e. settlement layer), so there's no way bitcoin and any other coin can compete with them in that regard.  The ONLY way they can compete is in transaction flow (where scalability is key).  If Litecoin adopts segwit (and it actually works to scale), while bitcoin doesn't, I see no reason to hold bitcoin at that point.

I gave the estimate a long time ago (I'm sure somebody remembers it) that you would need at least 8MB blocks (or around 50 TPS) for bitcoin to be a valid, globally used currency with market penetration into the upper middle class.  That's speaking on-chain scaling alone, and at that number, it would probably be uneconomical to do transactions under something like $10,000, but the network would probably continue to exist and not fade into obscurity.  

Jihan Wu and the other Chinese seem to have made a deal that litecoin will go to at least 2MB blocks in the future (the equivalent of bitcoin with 8MB blocks), and agreed to segwit.  So litecoin seems to have passed the minimum required scaling threshold to exist, while bitcoin has not.  Hell, at this point, the optimal strategy for the Chinese might even be continuing to block segwit on bitcoin on purpose to destroy it while investing money into cheap litecoin and profiting on the destruction of BTC as the litecoin they bought for pennies skyrockets.

A similar move was done by the Pilgrims Society in gold vs silver.  Most of these rich bankers and aristocrats had their money invested only in gold, so they conspired to demonetize silver, which had the result of being a transfer of all silver wealth to the gold they hold.  There is nothing to gain by attempting to keep silver down now, so in the near future I imagine some of these same people will conspire to remonetize silver to drain the money back out of gold for profit, thus screwing China, India, Russia, and the arab nations who bought up all the gold.



1066. Post 18813381 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: york780 on April 30, 2017, 06:14:28 PM
Simply because SegWit isnt the final solution for scaling.
It gives BTC some time, but nothing more.
It will go like this:

-SegWit on LTC
-SegWit on BTC
-8mb on LTC
-8mb on BTC'
-scaling solved.
-LTC useless because its dummy purpose has fullfilled its destiny
-BTC moons

The end.

I added more onto my post at the end as to why they might actually stop bitcoin from scaling on purpose in order to wreck it for profit while raising the value of the litecoins they bought for pennies in comparison.  Since someone made the bad judgement of requiring 95% approval for segwit on bitcoin, there is also the chance it never gets activated.  A government entity, bankers, or whoever could start up some miners and reject segwit while dumping the coins they mine for profit and basically block it perpetually for....FREE...NO COST.  Bitcoin will not scale without forking into two chains and having an enormous rough consensus attack at this point.



1067. Post 18813495 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Nagadota on April 30, 2017, 06:25:24 PM
and since Bitcoin has a more predictable supply than Ethereum it can be used as the ideal store of value.
Currencies are never a store of value.
For most people, currencies are the only store of value.  People hold their money in bank accounts or in cash and regardless of whether or not they expect it to rise, they definitely use currency as a store of value.

Just because they pretend they're stores of value due to financial ignorance doesn't mean they are.  Another example is that I have relatives who make believe dividend paying stocks (whose average across the board on S&P is 2.3% or something) are somehow giving them free money.  The "official" inflation rate is something like 2.5-2.7% now (in reality probably a lot higher), so they're actually losing money by holding dividend stocks unless the stocks also rise with inflation.  

The stocks are at the top of a bubble though, so there's no reason for them to rise and it's just pure risk with no reward holding them.  Even in hyperinflation stocks don't keep up with inflation nearly as good as metals do.  You typically lose money holding stocks in hyperinflation while actually gaining purchasing power by holding metals.



1068. Post 18817598 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: bitserve on April 30, 2017, 07:00:33 PM
Well, that's where he's completely wrong because no cryptocurrency is a store of value.

And that's where you are completely wrong, because almost anything is a "store of value". Gold is, silver is, currencies are, marble is, copper is, steel is, FIAT is, collectibles are, wood is.... everything.

Cryptocurrency is definitely not.  To be a store of value, you have to be able to put up some type of fight against time and entropy itself - transferring a fungible, unchangeable unit of account from past to future regardless of any externalities.  Bitcoin is not even fungible for fucks sake, nor is it durable since the system is designed to be molded by the entropy process and can transform into something completely different at the drop of a hat.  Or things like rough consensus attack, cryptography failures, poorly structured incentives, etc, can implode it.

So in real, technical terms, bitcoin is the EXACT OPPOSITE of money and the exact opposite of what a store of value is.  It's like I said 5000 times before, just a currency.  It does not matter if late night infomercial guy Antonopolous told you it's a store of value or money.  It's clearly not.  Just because it's more difficult (but not impossible) to cause inflation doesn't mean it's not a currency or that it's the same thing as gold and silver.


Quote from: bitserve on April 30, 2017, 09:26:48 PM
Bitcoin is way undervalued in comparison to altcoins. That's what changed.

It's really not.  I said months ago bitcoin was probably going to hit a wall once transaction fees got to around $1-2, and it got pretty damn close to that already.  This is why alts are getting such action and why LTC with segwit passing will probably outperform btc gains for the time being if people are going to let bitcoin sit at 4 TPS forever.  It requies scaling and probably needs a critical threshold of at least 50 TPS to survive at all.



1069. Post 18817780 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 01, 2017, 03:09:16 AM
roach is the new jstolfi ... only fools, idiots and ideologues can remain wrong in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary ... they all have no shame.

Good old Marcus, the guy who claims anyone who doesn't think bitcoin will go straight up in a vertical line to infinity at 4 TPS is wrong.



1070. Post 18819861 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: jbreher on May 01, 2017, 03:38:39 AM
$1420.00 on GDAX...

A $100 spread between GDAX and BTCE and $300 spread between Finex and China means we're in some type of MtGox scam territory.  These types of enormous spreads have never been seen before post-Gox.  The people who run these exchanges are complete dirtbags that will insider trade against customers because there's no laws stopping them.  It was pathetic that the second Bitfinex shuts off it's withdrawals, it seemed like the people running the exchange believed that was the perfect moment to attempt to do some complete non-aggregate market pump to margin call all their own customers LOL.

I would also be pissed if I had cash sitting on that exchange and they tell me, "Hey wer'e shutting off withdrawals.  Have fun buying coins $100-$300 over market rate just to get your money out of here while we allow our insider trading team to force you to buy at the highest top dollar possible."  Everything about this market is a complete scam right now, and as usual, all revolving around Bitfinex.  The men who can make $60 million disappear into thin air.



1071. Post 18866155 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

An Eth shill came up with the best description of the Bitfinex situation:

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on May 04, 2017, 06:42:20 AM
I won't be surprised if it turns out that the fiat withdrawal problems at BFX were deliberate, so could unload their own bags at a premium price on their own exchange. It wouldn't be surprising if they go full gox with money going missing either. Anyway people who deal with them will probably loose one way or another.

The second those charts turned bad for bitcoin and the market began to roll over, Bitfinex immediately pulled the plug on withdrawals right at the top of the cliff.  Then, instead of going down, they forced a short squeeze of basically every single customer on their entire exchange, plus forcing all cash holders to dump fiat and buy bitcoin to be able to remove anything from the exchange at all, and here we are now in some absurd bubble with $100 spreads or more between all exchanges.



1072. Post 18873876 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

I think Elwar has lost his mind; made enough money to retire with BTC but instead of cashing out anything, attempts to use bitcoin as his savings account and spends as he goes until death...

What happens if bitcoin dies?  You can suddenly no longer retire and you're living on the streets? Lol?  I use bitcoin as my checking account and gold + silver (30% gold 70% silver split) as my savings account.  Both gold and silver are barely over cost of production, and platinum is even probably below cost of production now.  This means there's not a whole lot of danger using metals as your savings account, while god knows what will happen to bitcoin.

When the next financial implosion happens, gold tends to hold up better in deflation, and silver tends to do wayyy better than gold in inflation.  The powers that be have not actually let the economy have a real deflationary crash since the 1920s, but if they did, cryptocurrency would get absolutely slaughtered in deflation compared to metals.

You have to vary your financial assets some just to hedge against the possibilities of cascading deflationary collapse vs hyperinflation, and being all in on bitcoin would be absolute shit for deflation.  Cash would obviously be the best for deflation, but gold holds up well enough in deflation for me that I tend to just hold gold as a cash substitute and keep the other savings portion in silver for higher upside potential.



1073. Post 18875518 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on May 04, 2017, 09:42:06 PM
Who bought the dip?  Shocked

Buying the dip means selling bitcoin while it's high and parlaying profits into LTC before it goes to 0.02 - 0.04.  With LTC having segwit + coinbase, it will probably even go to some stupidly high unbelievable number like darkcoin did where you just stare at your screen reciting the words "what the fuck? what the fuck???"



1074. Post 18913295 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: kingsart on May 07, 2017, 04:13:37 PM
This is the year of altcoins like ethereum litecoin.

Contrary to what deranged Eth shills claim, the "killer app" of blockchains is not "smart contracts".  The killer app of blockchains is currency.  The so called smart contracts are way down on the list and have no legal authority behind them whatsoever, so the best case scenario is that they would be used in a some niche market, legal arbitrage gambling cases.  

Eth is also completely centralized with no obfuscation of who is in control of what, so people involved in Eth are already acting as some form of illegal, unregulated legal services/gambling services for the people at the top of the pyramid, and people acting as transaction validators will mostly be in the same boat when it changes to PoS.  Eth is a scam and the only reason it went up is because they sent the illiquid asset premine they created out of thin air to Poloniex and margin leveraged it higher.  If 2017 is going to be the year of any altcoin, it's going to be litecoin.



1075. Post 18950097 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: edgar on May 10, 2017, 02:07:11 AM
25% haircut!!

Stinking fiat!!




1076. Post 18963022 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Congratulations to all hold baggers.  If the fiat system were to collapse tomorrow, the premiere global digital payment system is now bit....litecoin.



1077. Post 18967528 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: r0ach on May 11, 2017, 05:43:39 AM
Last chance to board 4 TPS coin at the bargain basement price of $1856 MatTheMat.



1078. Post 18977872 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 11, 2017, 05:45:50 AM
1800 - came up a little faster than I expected, as did 1500.

Beginning to run out of targets

That's when you know it's time to sell if even Marcus who thinks the BTC price can only go up thinks the price is too high.



1079. Post 18978839 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Did we just witness the top of this in the last 30 seconds?



1080. Post 18994228 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: r0ach on May 11, 2017, 08:37:38 PM
Did we just witness the top of this in the last 30 seconds?




1081. Post 18994257 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on May 12, 2017, 08:35:29 PM
For those of you who hate Alts and want to crush them.. I found this utterly important:

https://twitter.com/dangermouse117/status/861992606292516864

ps do click on the info graphic and study it a bit.

Forker propaganda. I don't buy it. Big blocks can bite a wax tadpole as far as I'm concerned.

He's 100% correct and I've explained it to you fools 500 times.  Bitcoin is a currency, not money.  It's value is entirely flow, not stock based.  This is why I'm 0% in bitcoin and 100% in Litecoin now.



1082. Post 18994533 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: Torque on May 12, 2017, 09:01:49 PM
For those of you who hate Alts and want to crush them.. I found this utterly important:

https://twitter.com/dangermouse117/status/861992606292516864

ps do click on the info graphic and study it a bit.

Forker propaganda. I don't buy it. Big blocks can bite a wax tadpole as far as I'm concerned.

He's 100% correct and I've explained it to you fools 500 times.  Bitcoin is a currency, not money.  It's value is entirely flow, not stock based.  This is why I'm 0% in bitcoin and 100% in Litecoin now.

Biggest bunch of horse shit. Altcoins are pumping because that was the whole bait-and-switch BS plan this year, nothing more.

And r0ach, ur an idiot. A guy that says Bitcoin is complete crap compared to PMs, and hates cryptocurrencies in general, but yet is now supposedly 100% all in Litecoin for.... what fkn reason?  Roll Eyes

Again, 'cause ur an idiot, the reason why nobody here pays you any attention.

Yes, Litecoin was such a horrible trade I only made 600% on it while you guys were praying to the gods to deliver you a 5% bitcoin rise.  The chinese trading team on litecoin is still trying to hold it down to accumulate more, so there is no way I'm leaving for any other coin right now.



1083. Post 18997240 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 12, 2017, 10:52:56 PM
there is nothing worse than the bellowing of sold-out-early bulls, they make me sick (worse than bears I think) ... roach is our best example around here, still fapping hisself about selling out and going full fiat at $600 roach?

Nobody sold out at $600.  I've been buying metals from $800 - $1600 and just made 600% on litecoin too.  Anything I missed in bitcoin I already made up in alts.  There's really zero reason to hold BTC over LTC right now either.  Whoever buys this LTC double bottom will make far more money than anyone in Bitcoin.



1084. Post 19008804 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: talkingleaves on May 13, 2017, 11:49:33 AM
there is nothing worse than the bellowing of sold-out-early bulls, they make me sick (worse than bears I think) ... roach is our best example around here, still fapping hisself about selling out and going full fiat at $600 roach?

Nobody sold out at $600.  I've been buying metals from $800 - $1600 and just made 600% on litecoin too.  Anything I missed in bitcoin I already made up in alts.  There's really zero reason to hold BTC over LTC right now either.  Whoever buys this LTC double bottom will make far more money than anyone in Bitcoin.

how high do you think ltc can go from here roach?

The LTC price was honestly perfectly stable at 0.020, then the Chinese trading group/cartel forced it down from there while removing all buy walls + shorting + dos'ing Poloniex.  They have since dos'd Poloniex several more times trying to shake people out of LTC while having 5-10 Chinamen spam the chat with "LTC DIE, LTC GO TO 0".

Since it was stable at 0.020, it could just as easily hold 0.030 as well.  I don't know what the maximum upside will be, but I don't see why LTC can't beat the darkcoin blowoff top at something like $100 when LTC has a lot more respect as a coin than darkcoin does, and all excess traffic that BTC can't hold is going to flow straight to LTC and not coins like Darkcon.

Having said that, I don't have anything against asians, but I'm getting really tired of these annoying Chinamen.  They have a lot of traits similar to the jews where they think it's somehow ok for every word out of their mouth to be a lie.  That's called a "sociopath", not "the art of war".  Only weak people need to lie.  It's due to the concept of "face" in China where they make believe it's ok to try and screw over anyone that's not an immediate family member.

That's why it's so easy for me to trade against the Chinese, though.  They make the false assumption they're smarter than the people they're trading against, which causes them to think they can get away with repeating the same patterns over and over while you just front run them.



1085. Post 19118837 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

I know it's an unpopular view around here (especially among people like Marcus) that the value of bitcoin will not increase forever in a straight up vertical line, but here it is:

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-12-bitcoin-fair-price-analysis



1086. Post 19200931 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Welcome to bitcoin Barry Silbert's personal pump and dump playground



1087. Post 19201360 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Elwar on May 25, 2017, 10:49:23 PM
The price holding here for a while with no big impending crash would be quite lovely.

Well, if there was ever a flashing red warning sign that the top is in, this is probably it:

https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-is-mandatory-for-portfolio-protection-cnbc



1088. Post 19201800 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

$600 price spread (so far) in a single day, or 22% drop.  Nice pump and dump guys.



1089. Post 19201825 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: pfrtlpfmpf on May 26, 2017, 12:09:40 AM
The Asians will wake up this morning now

Average Poloniex conversation:  

"Just wait till antarctica wakes up"

"Do you mean the people on the surface or the ones inside the hollow earth?"

"Both I think"



1090. Post 19201903 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: ImI on May 26, 2017, 12:18:08 AM
$600 price spread (so far) in a single day, or 22% drop.  Nice pump and dump guys.

lol, look who's back? the second we get a little dump you dare to speak out again.  Grin

I'm not fond of rising prices on constantly decreasing USD volume on both Bitstamp and Finex.  That's the textbook definition of a roach motel:

Finex:



Bitstamp:



"Smart money" is definitely not buying in such a situation.  All the large players who actually want bitcoin already own bitcoin, hence why there is no volume.  Now it's just a giant CNBC Jim Cramer mad money scheme of trying to find some random guy in the public to dump on at more than you paid.




1091. Post 19203787 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Holliday on May 26, 2017, 03:40:28 AM
That looks like bitcoinity.org to me. The volume bars default to bitcoin (mBTC in fact) on bitcoinity.org and it appears that you haven't changed it. Here is the same BitStamp chart after changing volume to USD.

You're right.  Not sure why the default volume listed would be denominated in bitcoin when bitcoin is a derivative of the US dollar so the only thing useful for traders is the USD volume.  Anyways, on USD volume Bitfinex is down from halving while bitstamp is up.  When I say it's a derivative of the US dollar, if the amount of dollars in circulation goes down (deflationary event), then the price of bitcoin goes down...while in inflation it goes up.  You could claim the Chinese printing money endlessly would also cause it to go up, but in the end it mostly comes back to whatever is the unit of account for international trade.  

I guess if you wanted to nit pick, you could say bitcoin is a derivative of the aggregate of all fiats...



1092. Post 19203863 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

The funny part is all exchanges are in a down wedge, while the guy on GDAX who has been trying to manipulate the price upwards forever is trying to rig the market to paint the tape in a sideways channel.  Lol GDAX manipulator:

Everywhere else



GDAX



I've ALWAYS hated that GDAX guy because it means there is zero purpose in using GDAX if you're trying to buy cheap on dumps.  He just paints the tape to try and rig the market with his shallow 0.001btc bid wall support spam with no actual liquidity.  Not that I would actually be looking to buy right now in the first place at the top of a parabolic rise.



1093. Post 19204057 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

I would like to see someone like Marcus or Elwar who is all-in on bitcoin try to debunk my hypothesis that the economics of bitcoin don't actually work in the long term in comparison to metals:

Why the economics of bitcoin don't actually work - What Satoshi really meant when he said the price would either be a lot or zero

http://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-13-why-the-economics-of-bitcoin-don-t-actually-work-what-satoshi-really-meant-when-he-said-the-price-would

I have discussed some of this with Steve @ SRSRocco before and he didn't seem to see any holes in it.



1094. Post 19205500 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Coinnosaurus on May 26, 2017, 06:36:46 AM
you know it .. the red phallus will be yuge

and how much do you think the average japanese or korean person is going to care about an exchange they've barely heard of? they might nod and then keep on buying. it's slowly sliding into absolute irrelevance.
just for future reference https://coinone.co.kr/chart/?site=Coinone&unit_time=1D
thats a 34% drop ))

Korea is used to red candles.  Their currency devalued by 50% overnight in the '98 asia currency crisis:



The USD will probably have an event like this in the near future where they devalue the dollar vs gold by an astronomical amount overnight.  #physicalsilverbitchez



1095. Post 19217882 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: T.Stuart on May 26, 2017, 07:35:04 AM
Interesting to drop by very occasionally to see who's around, gone mad, still hodling, etc. I see r0ach has flipped.

The only reason I mess with bitcoin now is to try and profit on swings.  I don't see any reason to support bitcoin ideologically since it's completely inferior to gold and silver as money and a store of value, while it's also inevitable that if bitcoin doesn't die, it will be co-opted by the state - turning it into a cashless society slave system.  I articulated all of those reasons in this post:

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-13-why-the-economics-of-bitcoin-don-t-actually-work-what-satoshi-really-meant-when-he-said-the-price-would

Bitcoin is more like a cult based on a bad economic system rather than sound money.  Yes, you can make money in the short term, but only because it's designed as a get rich quick scheme to try and force others to buy in higher.  But in the long run, it has to actually function as a store of value...and it doesn't.  The second the majority of market participants realize this, the bottom will drop out and all that money will head to the base of Exter's pyramid (gold and silver).  I prefer silver for higher upside potential.



1096. Post 19218042 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 26, 2017, 11:42:36 PM
Interesting to drop by very occasionally to see who's around, gone mad, still hodling, etc. I see r0ach has flipped.

The only reason I mess with bitcoin now is to try and profit on swings.  I do not see any reason to support bitcoin ideologically since it's completely inferior to gold and silver as money and a store of value, while it's also inevitable that if bitcoin doesn't die, it will be co-opted by the state, turning it into a cashless society slave system.  I enumerated all of those reasons in this post:

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-13-why-the-economics-of-bitcoin-don-t-actually-work-what-satoshi-really-meant-when-he-said-the-price-would

There are many stores of value. But it's better we don't go into that argument again.

I have one question for you... Why that obsession you have with gold and silver? I already know your opinion about Bitcoin, so... What do you think about real estate? Excepting some of the past years it has historically been a great store of value which can also give you some additional yearly returns (3-10%).

Because real estate is in a horrific bubble.  We will need someone really old, like dinosaur age to confirm this (maybe Jimbo), but I believe in ancient times, you could buy a house with only 2x the average yearly salary.  Now the price is more like 4-10x or higher.  Real estate will collapse at least in half.  CB's just reinflated the real estate bubble again to try and prevent a deflationary collapse.  Economic collapse is coming no matter what they do.  The more they try to manipulate to stop mark to market mechanics and extend the bubble, the bigger the crash will be and the more profit will be made from gold and silver.



1097. Post 19218092 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Elwar on May 26, 2017, 11:54:17 PM
Interesting to drop by very occasionally to see who's around, gone mad, still hodling, etc. I see r0ach has flipped.

The only reason I mess with bitcoin now is to try and profit on swings.  I don't see any reason to support bitcoin ideologically since it's completely inferior to gold and silver as money and a store of value, while it's also inevitable that if bitcoin doesn't die, it will be co-opted by the state - turning it into a cashless society slave system.  I articulated all of those reasons in this post:

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-13-why-the-economics-of-bitcoin-don-t-actually-work-what-satoshi-really-meant-when-he-said-the-price-would

Bitcoin is more like a cult based on a bad economic system rather than sound money.  Yes, you can make money in the short term, but only because it's designed as a get rich quick scheme to try and force others to buy in higher.  But in the long run, it has to actually function as a store of value...and it doesn't.  The second the majority of market participants realize this, the bottom will drop out and all that money will head to the base of Exter's pyramid (gold and silver).  I prefer silver for higher upside potential.
I still don't see why YOU are posting HERE

If you don't believe in Bitcoin perhaps you should go and peddle your logic in a forum of your peers?

Posting steemit links makes him money. Crypto money.

Nah, I just know both Larimers so decided to use their system instead of some weird site like Medium.  Most of what I type isn't politically correct, so it's also less likely to be censored there.



1098. Post 19218157 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: gentlemand on May 27, 2017, 12:00:54 AM
Because this joint attracts enough fellow anti semites for some reason.

Yes, you're so correct.  There are only 195 countries in the world and the jews have been kicked out of over 100 of them since 0 AD, not because they always attempt to form a state within a state to the detriment of the native population - while also practicing usury enslavement against them - but because everyone on earth is just so irrationally anti-semitic!



1099. Post 19219050 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on May 27, 2017, 01:11:56 AM
and here's a cool stat - https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/6deopl/daily_discussion_friday_may_26_2017/di3fto6/

61% of the volume on japan's biggest exchange is down to three people. we have our new china but now it's even more obvious.

One single person/entity on Bitfinex has controlled the entire bitcoin market from $200 till now.  The only time that person/entity wasn't controlling the market was when the price briefly went higher on Bitstamp and GDAX when it was like $2700 recently.  Some people liked to make believe exchanges like Huobi controlled the market for a while, but they just use fake volume to paint the tape and they could never move the market higher than exchanges like Finex allowed.

The rare exception to this rule might be that one enormous OKcoin short squeeze, but it might be the same entity from Bitfinex squeezing OKcoin shorters too.  Whether the price of bitcoin is high or low, the price is always based on a tiny handful of fraudulent actors and a few crooked exchanges.  The sole actor controlling the market is just as likely to be the exchange owner himself as an external entity as well.  We've already seen this precedent with Gox and it probably still continues to this day.

Poloniex is another fishy example.  It used to be where 2000 BTC volume for a coin per day was huge, then overnight suddenly every coin has 50,000 BTC volume for no reason.  I have a feeling there is something not good going on behind the scenes of that.



1100. Post 19220376 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on May 27, 2017, 04:34:00 AM
whales have them shorts opened above 2000, should be steep drop from here

I would like to thank everyone for attending the Barry Silbert and Winklevoss exit pump.  Please do make sure you come back next year to attend the Elwar & Marcus exit pump as well.



1101. Post 19220501 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Well, there was no reason for the price to even skyrocket in the first place.  The whole thing was just a short squeeze from Bitfinex turning off withdrawals forcing all sellers to become buyers, and forcing people who didn't even want to buy to buy more just to withdraw.  Then even with those absurd circumstances, there was still no actual volume.  The whole damn thing was predicated by a giant Bitfinex scam as usual:




1102. Post 19220675 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on May 27, 2017, 05:55:39 AM
being away from crypto for 6 months (yeah missed the rise) i thought it was rising cause scaling issues were close to be solved, i was surprised we're pretty much still at square one




1103. Post 19221082 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

The bitcoin market has never taken money from me besides the occasional transaction fee and whatnot, so I can't even imagine what it would feel like buying a $2800 bitcoin and the price immediately going to $2000, but I'm sure that guy is in this thread somewhere.



1104. Post 19221142 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

It just broke into the $1800's on BTCE



1105. Post 19223418 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: NUFCrichard on May 27, 2017, 09:57:29 AM
this volatility is joke. It can't be classed as a serious investment, we can have fun with it, but 40% falls in a few hours without any real reason, that isn't a serious investment.

Times like this call for sound advice from the lord of bitcoin, MatTheCat:

Quote from: MatTheCat on November 15, 2015, 03:41:05 AM
these markets are just not to be traded

Quote from: MatTheCat on February 21, 2016, 10:14:28 AM
The majority who invest money in a vacuos asset like Bitcoin are certain to lose

Quote from: MatTheCat on April 27, 2016, 09:07:00 AM
So my plan is to look for long setups

Quote from: MatTheCat on February 06, 2016, 12:04:00 PM
I am hoping to walk away with other players money.

Quote from: MatTheCat on January 24, 2016, 08:54:17 PM
Fucking rat cocksuckers. 6 fucking BTC trade with Stop Order

Quote from: MatTheCat on February 23, 2016, 05:37:10 PM
I would gladly see Bitcoin die tomorrow

Quote from: MatTheCat on February 17, 2016, 01:58:12 PM
a cabal of vampire parasites takes its place....



1106. Post 19223507 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on May 27, 2017, 10:18:13 AM
Just woke up, what a mess  Shocked As expected... This is the reason why Bitcoin never will succeed. People can´t trust this. Now the media shitstorm will start all over again.

It's a good thing.  If you could play god and decide whether silver or bitcoin will be the main monetary instrument of the common man on the planet and get to insider invest beforehand, there is ZERO reason anyone should choose bitcoin.  Metals are a better store of value, lower counter party risk, just as much or higher upside potential as bitcoin (for silver), and it's 100% inevitable if bitcoin doesn't die it would be completely co-opted by the state and turned into a cashless society slave system.






1107. Post 19223589 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on May 27, 2017, 10:25:13 AM
You remember that Gox scenario? It took almost 4 years to recover... I feel the same this time. When you own 100 coins, thats a loss of $100k in 3 days, insane... They must regulate bitcoin, otherwise people will always call it Fonzi and Scam...

Regulation does nothing.  Link courtesy of anonymint:

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=984

Basically what it means is, regulatory agencies are always doomed to enter regulatory capture and be controlled by the entity they are supposed to regulate.  So with no regulation, you usually end up trading against the house (the exchange owners) as they buy or sell coins that don't even exist, gox-style, to squeeze all the longs and shorts, or just flat out steal them (like Bitfinex) because there's no penalty for them doing so.  When you bring in regulation, it becomes captured by the same people and you are still trading against the house, just they now have the legal system backing them to boot.  

The only way to mitigate this effect at all is to take physical possession of the commodity/currency yourself.  Such a thing is not really even possible with bitcoin because even if you own the private keys, it still has far higher counter party risk than metals.  A random bitcoin dev could wake up one morning and decide to try and fork the network, or a random chinaman could try and do a 51% attack, etc.  Bitcoin counterparty risk is still enormous even if you hold the private key because...the coins still reside on the blockchain and you didn't actually take possesion of anything...



1108. Post 19223733 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Karpeles on May 27, 2017, 10:37:05 AM
Hey R0ach, why do you always speak as if there a war between gold/silver and Bitcoin for world currency dominance, and only one could win and the other will certainly die Huh

Bitcoin and metals can live happy and together

Vermin like Larry Summers and Ben Bernanke are promoting "cryptocurrency" now.  Do the math.  The main purpose of bitcoin is currently regulatory arbitrage, which is something the state would never allow on a long timeline.  They will claim volatility is too high + too many people are laundering money or not paying taxes and will force something like chain anchor on people, or create a fixed address alias system wrapper to go around bitcoin and mandate everyone use it or be considered a launderer.  

Bitcoin is stupidly easy for the state to co-opt, that's why they WANT you to use it.  They want all the cattle herded into this bullshit and out of the gold and silver market so they can then slam the door shut on the slaughterhouse with everyone trapped inside.  You are basically helping them enslave you by using it because it's inevitable they will turn this into their cashless society slave system in one way or another.  It's also clear all the R3 banker scum own far more Ethereum than Bitcoin, which is why they are constantly trying to pump completely useless and centralized Ethereum too.  



1109. Post 19223911 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on May 27, 2017, 10:56:11 AM
Roach is the new NLC.

No, I'm the only honest person on the entire forum that doesn't make up lies claiming bitcoin is a more sound form of money than gold and silver.



1110. Post 19232283 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 27, 2017, 10:29:49 PM
No, I'm the only honest person on the entire forum that doesn't make up lies claiming bitcoin is a more sound form of money than gold and silver.

Bitcoin is a more sound form of money. Can you use your mobile app to pay in gold for goods and services? Are you delusional?

I wonder how many confirmations would the local starbucks need before accepting a gold nugget as authentic and serve me my coffee... And I don't think a blocksize increase nor second layer are on the works for gold market.

Feels like I'm talking to a bunch of millenial transgender children.  First of all, only cuckolds go to Starbucks.  Secondly, bitcoin is:

1) a currency, not money
2) does not remove counter party risk
3) is not a store of value

Just because you want to live a barbie fashion millenial lifestyle doesn't mean the laws of physics share your delusion about what constitutes a fungible commodity currency that actually removes counter party risk and can't be counterfeited.  The governance of bitcoin is simply mob rule.  Even if you totally ignore the fact that it's value prospect is supposed to be based on decentralization while not being decentralized at all, with no nash equilirbium - invalidating it's entire purpose in the first place - the mob rule crowd can even come together to increase the coin limit at random if they so choose.  

It's likely the 21 million count even has to be removed to combat adversarial mining strategy at zero block reward:

https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2016/10/21/bitcoin-is-unstable-without-the-block-reward/

So please, stop being complete idiots and pretending bitcoin is in some way superior to gold and silver.  The noble metals are the only viable candidate for sound money on this entire planet at the moment if you do not want to live under central bankers - which are the one of the main tenets of (((communism))).



1111. Post 19249323 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Ok, people.  I'm tired of fucking around with ambiguous definitions:  Is bitcoin decentralized?  Does bitcoin have value? etc.  I have decided to address these issues from proof of work to proof of stake where a normal human can easily quantify if Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency has value and whether it will live or die:

http://steemit.com/steemit/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-14-defining-if-cryptocurrency-has-a-value-or-zero-value-from-a-fundamental-scientific-perspective

It's relatively short to read, but if you want the TLDR version, my stance is that proof of stake has no value whatsoever and I explain why, and proof of work with ASIC is almost functionally the same thing (externalized proof of stake) in practice and would also have no value.  I don't think anyone will find a valid argument against this post.



1112. Post 19252868 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on May 28, 2017, 03:31:28 AM
QUICKLY NOW! get some real money before its to late!!!!!!!!!!

QUICKLY
QUICKLY
QUICKLY

Now that's a fine perspective:




1113. Post 19253073 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: sidhujag on May 29, 2017, 04:30:01 AM
Ok, people.  I'm tired of fucking around with ambiguous definitions:  Is bitcoin decentralized?  Does bitcoin have value? etc.  I have decided to address these issues from proof of work to proof of stake where a normal human can easily quantify if Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency has value and whether it will live or die:

http://steemit.com/steemit/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-14-defining-if-cryptocurrency-has-a-value-or-zero-value-from-a-fundamental-scientific-perspective

It's relatively short to read, but if you want the TLDR version, my stance is that proof of stake has no value whatsoever and I explain why, and proof of work with ASIC is almost functionally the same thing (externalized proof of stake) in practice and would also have no value.  I don't think anyone will find a valid argument against this post.
I do not think you understand the meaning of decentralized. Bitcoin is only centralized logically which is desired. Politically and architecturally it is decentralized. You should be clear that you are arguing for the fact that you "think" it is not politically decentralized. You cannot argue it is not architecturally decentralized because that would simply not be true.

With that you should revisit your article and perhaps I will read it when it is well understood that the author understands the meaning of decentralization on which his whole argument is formed. Heh, you mention ambiguous definitions are tiresome yet you then go off and give assumptions and hypothesis' based on ambiguous definitions yourself.

You can't be serious.  You're basically making the argument that anything where someone has not double spent *YET* or *CONSTANTLY* is automatically decentralized.  That's not how this works.  You are not automatically proven to be decentralized with a functional Nash equilibrium until mass armageddon begins.  It is ironic that the ASIC factory sunk cost is the only reason there is not constant double spend, but those same ASICs also make the system inherently worthless and the equivalent of a closed entropy system at the same time.



1114. Post 19253388 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Elwar on May 29, 2017, 09:29:45 AM
Ok, people.  I'm tired of fucking around with ambiguous definitions:  Is bitcoin decentralized?  Does bitcoin have value? etc.  I have decided to address these issues from proof of work to proof of stake where a normal human can easily quantify if Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency has value and whether it will live or die:

http://steemit.com/steemit/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-14-defining-if-cryptocurrency-has-a-value-or-zero-value-from-a-fundamental-scientific-perspective

It's relatively short to read, but if you want the TLDR version, my stance is that proof of stake has no value whatsoever and I explain why, and proof of work with ASIC is almost functionally the same thing (externalized proof of stake) in practice and would also have no value.  I don't think anyone will find a valid argument against this post.

I've come to accept that you put far too much faith in centralized organizations to act intelligently and accomplish what they want to accomplish.

If the central powers were as good as you give them credit for, we would have never needed Bitcoin in the first place.

Not sure what you're referring to.

As for the other guy talking about metals, due to the seasonal aspect of the metals market, I believe July is usually the best month to buy, then the market tends to pump from August onwards.  If bitcoin was flat or down at that time, yea, it would be a good idea to dump bitcoin for metals.  Silver is closing in on a wedge that I believe is going to break upwards hard long before August, though.  They simply can't push them down much lower than they already are, and they definitely can't push platinum down any more (although I like silver better for the monetary Schelling point since platinum is not considered a monetary metal by most).



1115. Post 19253692 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Elwar on May 29, 2017, 09:55:09 AM
Ok, people.  I'm tired of fucking around with ambiguous definitions:  Is bitcoin decentralized?  Does bitcoin have value? etc.  I have decided to address these issues from proof of work to proof of stake where a normal human can easily quantify if Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency has value and whether it will live or die:

http://steemit.com/steemit/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-14-defining-if-cryptocurrency-has-a-value-or-zero-value-from-a-fundamental-scientific-perspective

It's relatively short to read, but if you want the TLDR version, my stance is that proof of stake has no value whatsoever and I explain why, and proof of work with ASIC is almost functionally the same thing (externalized proof of stake) in practice and would also have no value.  I don't think anyone will find a valid argument against this post.

I've come to accept that you put far too much faith in centralized organizations to act intelligently and accomplish what they want to accomplish.

If the central powers were as good as you give them credit for, we would have never needed Bitcoin in the first place.

Not sure what you're referring to.

As for the other guy talking about metals, due to the seasonal aspect of the metals market, I believe July is usually the best month to buy, then the market tends to pump from August onwards.  If bitcoin was flat or down at that time, yea, it would be a good idea to dump bitcoin for metals.  Silver is closing in on a wedge that I believe is going to break upwards hard long before August, though.

Every reason you give for not liking Bitcoin tends to be based on some powerful government being able to methodically to stamp it out in some way or another.

What do you believe the price of bitcoin would be tomorrow if the govt announced it was banned without even lifting a finger at all to exert any force?  Since bitcoin is not the unit of account of anything, the entire basis of it's value is derived from the ability to convert to fiat.  Not that I believe they will actually do such a thing.  It's obvious by this point they plan to try and co-opt it and slide in things like MIT chain anchor when you have vermin like Larry Summers and Bernanke promote it.  It's too difficult for them to trick people into a cashless society slave system otherwise.  They need them to do it voluntarily.

As for metals, gold is still the unit of account of central bankers worldwide, and silver was the unit of account for the majority of people walking the earth for the last few thousand years.  When the current fiat Ponzi system implodes, the Schelling point at that juncture will again place gold and silver at the forefront.  When paper federal reserve notes stop being valuable, the first thought of what money could possibly be now is always going to be gold and silver, not bitcoin.  Sure, bitcoin may or may not get a bump when the financial system implodes, but metals are the Schelling point.



1116. Post 19265484 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Dafar on May 30, 2017, 12:39:54 AM
Sup fellas...


Are we bleeding down to $1500-$1700?

Or trying for $3000 again?

And what's gonna happen on August 1st? Anyone else a little worried about UASF vs Jihan??

Well, transaction fees to get into next block are now $2.18, so bitcoin is now more expensive than an ATM.  This means it's usage as a currency is rapidly dwindling and putting it into settlement network only territory, except it doesn't actually function as a store of value like metals, so not useful as a settlement network.  The fundamentals just don't make any sense in that regard.  I assume the bitcoin traffic will also begin to spill into another coin looking for lower fees (probably litecoin).



1117. Post 19265616 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on May 30, 2017, 12:58:41 AM
I wonder how can someone call this "storage of value" and then claim Bitcoin isn't at all:

http://www.macrotrends.net/1470/historical-silver-prices-100-year-chart

I see a head and shoulders forming right now on silver, neckline @ ~$14.48

Except charts on metals don't matter when it's just the ESF painting the tape to try and make the dollar look better.  They try to paint those patterns on purpose.  They can't naked it short it below cost of production or it will then cause the price to skyrocket.  This coming wedge in silver will break upwards.  That's why there is huge OI right now.



1118. Post 19265718 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Current Bitcoin transaction fee: $2.18

Peer to peer gold and silver transaction: $0  

Surprise Goyim, it's a rent seeking usury system.




1119. Post 19265978 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Elwar on May 30, 2017, 01:39:08 AM
Bitcoin fees $2.18, peer to peer gold and silver transaction $0...hmm.....

Surprise Goyim, it's a rent seeking usury system.

In the non-bitcoin world I would need to get a bank account on base (a very unfriendly bank), withdraw the cash and go to a local exchange that would charge me 4-5%.

The fact that it's hard to conveniently order things on Amazon.com while deployed in the military (as it probably should be since I don't think they were doing that in WWII), doesn't exactly change the fact that bitcoin is a rent seeking usury system.  When the money requires a fee just to exist at all, that's nothing but a replica of current debt based money.



1120. Post 19267207 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 30, 2017, 03:13:59 AM
That whole north/south pole-flipping, world-ending scenario prediction of 2012 was rather scary but never materialized.

I don't think Cliff High is credible since he's always talking about UFOs and other off the wall shit and think he even says he constantly sees them at night or something (or was that Bix Weir), but there is actually geological evidence of those pole flips occurring.  The best example I remember is that some magnetic material in clay was all orientated in a certain manner during one era, then the pole flip occurs and it's orientated the opposite way.  

It's a hard phenomenon to understand ranging from thoughts of "oh shit, that will make our entire atmosphere float off into space with the solar winds", to "well, it might just create patches of holes temporarily that allow more charged particles in to increase cancer rates before completing the flip".  From when I personally looked into it, I don't think there was ever any extinction events coinciding with pole flips, but I could be wrong.  Something like the Yellowstone volcano is probably a much bigger problem if you live somewhere like America and don't live on the far east coast.



1121. Post 19267312 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: CoinCube on May 30, 2017, 04:36:05 AM
Current Bitcoin transaction fee: $2.18

Peer to peer gold and silver transaction: $0  

Let's do a peer to peer gold transaction. I'll pay you double spot for an ounce of gold on delivery. Let's see about those $0 transaction fees.

Here is my address. https://www.google.com/maps/@-43.1382064,147.2102165,17z

That address lol  Cheesy

This is not Burger King motherfucker.  Nobody said you get to have it your way.  Not to mention the fact that any bitcoin sent would obviously be for a good or service, and that good would need to be transported to you still whether you use bitcoin or gold or silver.  Best case scenario you are eliminating 1/2 of the round trip by using unsound money, increasing globalization at the expense of the local economy.  Bitcoin is great for subsidizing the current status quo dysfunctional system.  

At some point down the road (probably sooner than later), that globalization paradigm will implode and either only the local economy will matter, or the local economy is going to matter a lot more.  In that context of local economies (even in present day), there is no reason to use any form of money with usury fees tied to it which rules bitcoin out.



1122. Post 19335239 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Zegra on June 02, 2017, 11:58:56 PM
The main monero developer did a troll announcement which caused the price to dip 25% in a mater of minutes, and kept sinking for a few days. After that 25% dip though, one after the other altcoin started going in red, it was like a chain reaction. And then half an hour later Bitcoin started dumping.

Have no fear, the wedge on real money (silver) is about to break upwards.  The banks naked short metals down to barely above cost of production, but it's already so close to cost of production it doesn't really have anywhere to go but up:



Of course, anything is possible and they could naked short it some more just for the hell of it, but it would create scarcity from going below cost of production and fuel an even larger rise.  So it's a good medium/long term hold no matter what they do.



1123. Post 19335450 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Cryptocurrency is a giant rat trap designed to ensnare your money and prevent you from being able to access it.  Every single one of these exchanges is like this now, and since Bitcoin is not the unit of account of anything, it's value is entirely derived from it's ability to convert to fiat:




1124. Post 19340817 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

LOL @ you fucking shills trying to link bitcoin to Ethereum.  Ethereum is some garbage premine scamcoin that has no relation to bitcoin whatsoever.  You see page after page of banker shills trying to claim the destiny of all cryptocurrency is somehow linked to that trash coin.  The only reason it ever went up is because R3 banking scum sent the illiquid asset premine to Poloniex and leveraged it to try and short squeeze people.

I personally think all cryptocurrency will eventually die since none of them are actually decentralized and that's what their value is supposed to be based on, but whether the ship sinks or floats will not be determined by some Ukranian IPO scammer named Vitalik.



1125. Post 19351458 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Torque on June 03, 2017, 04:18:25 PM
Peter Schiff is the only finance guy that I know that can be so right about the U.S. economy and world markets, and so wrong about what Bitcoin actually is.

Most of the audio is really good and worth a listen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF2DDrEaSOg (starts talking about crypto @ 24:18)

Peter Schiff is 100% right about bitcoin and metals, he just lacks the knowledge of how bitcoin works to explain why.  For instance, it's impossible for bitcoin to be a store of value because it's cost of production is self referencing based on it's own demand and not a derivative of an external variable like oil.  In other words, if the cost of production of an ounce of gold is $1000 and nobody is buying gold at the time, the cost of production isn't really affected.  It's still going to cost people a truckload of money if they want to bring any gold to market.  This is what allows it to be a store of value, it's floor is not derived from finicky market sentiment.

For bitcoin on the other hand, if nobody is buying bitcoins at the time, some miners will then have to shut down which has a 100% direct correlation with lowering cost of production and hence price floor.  Since bitcoin is an open entropy system and anyone can mine it, there is no reason for anyone to buy your older, higher cost of production coins.  They simply go pluck new coins from the never ending block reward tree for a lower price, and those coins never dry up since fees are recirculated.

After reading this, ANYONE should be able to easily see why metals have a somewhat functional price floor and bitcoin does not at all.  The only thing bitcoin has is a ponzi element called "the halving" which is a ghetto bandaid to try and fix the terminal problem of no price floor.  The "halving" is not actually a fix since the halvings are finite, though.  They mostly serve as a combination of get rich quick scheme and a way to try and bootstrap an unsound money system where nobody will figure out it's unsound until it's too late when the halvings dry up.



1126. Post 19353183 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Torque on June 04, 2017, 01:27:40 AM
For bitcoin on the other hand, if nobody is buying bitcoins at the time, some miners will then have to shut down which has a 100% direct correlation with lowering cost of production and hence price floor.  Since bitcoin is an open entropy system and anyone can mine it, there is no reason for anyone to buy your older, higher cost of production coins.  They simply go pluck new coins from the never ending block reward tree for a lower price, and those coins never dry up since fees are recirculated.

r0ach, go back and look at the data from Nov 2013 to Jan 2015. Bitcoin demand (and thus price) fell for 14 months, but hashrate never fell. In fact it continued to climb the whole time.

And I suspect other previous prolonged bear markets were the same.

It's solely because there's a state-subsidized ASIC cartel mafia in place.  Every one ASIC miner you buy from them allows them to build 10 more for themselves, making your purchase self defeating.  Then they outsource cost of mining to the collective on top of that by either being subsidized by the state with low price China energy or just flat out stealing it.  

You can then derive two possible outcomes:

1)  either this is the new normal and the only miners that will survive will be state sponsored or the state themselves by outsourcing costs to the collective, making bitcoin pretty much pointless since it would be state owned/run

or

2)  This is not the new normal and there won't be cases of people mining for what would be a loss while outsourcing cost to the state or collective.  They would have to turn miners off if price goes below break even like how KNC went bankrupt.  In this context bitcoin would be a god awful store of value in comparison to things like gold since the bitcoin floor can literally go from $10,000 to $1 overnight unlike metals.

TLDR:  the more people who steal energy, the more it "appears" bitcoin is a store of value



1127. Post 19353385 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Torque on June 04, 2017, 04:49:45 AM
Just like the precious metal cartels.

Mining bitcoin is an actual permissioned based system at this point.  You can technically go in your own backyard and attempt to mine gold or silver by hand, or just walk around the desert somewhere, etc.  This is relatively easy to do with copper and there's plenty of youtube videos where people do it, while also being doable with silver or gold, just requiring more effort.  For bitcoin, if there's only one guy on the planet who has invented the magic ASICboost racket, you now have to pay him royalties or extortion fees to even touch bitcoin.  

Bitcoin is far more prone to cartel centralization since there's only a tiny amount of foundries on earth in the first place like Intel, Samsung, GlobalFoundries, and TSMC.  Bitcoin can only be as decentralized as those gatekeeper corporations allow...

Like I said before, bitcoin is a ponzi scheme created by "some guy".  Gold and silver are a ponzi scheme created by *god.  The latter is obviously going to be better.



1128. Post 19355283 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Dabs on June 04, 2017, 05:30:46 AM
It's good to have both. I'll be getting myself some bullion soon.

I find it funny that on Zerohedge people argue about whether bitcoin or ethereum is better and the end result of what is "better" is not determined by any characteristics of the cryptocurrency, but whichever one is easiest to convert to silver or gold.  The current Zerohedge stance is that Ethereum is 100% useless since no bullion dealers accept it.



1129. Post 19357029 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 04, 2017, 09:58:50 AM
I know that we want to keep on writing off ETH - but there is continued and ongoing pump..

It's a 90,000 BTC volume digibyte day on Poloniex.  If there was ever a sign cryptocurrency has reached peak pump and dump, this is it.  There is no schelling point for any of this crap.  There's also no schelling point for bitcoin because it will always be highly constrained by scalability and thus high fees.  "Money" that requires some type of fees solely to exist at all (constant payment to miners 24/7) is also the hallmark trait of a debt based currency. 

Our current debt based US dollar is a rent seeking usury system that requires a constant interest payment for the money to exist.  Bitcoin is basically the same thing, just the whole process is obfuscated so that you don't know who the beneficiaries are.  The current beneficiaries are the Chinese mining cartel, but if bitcoin didn't die, they would eventually be replaced by the same international bankers from the BIS who run the US dollar running the mining pools.  They'll just toss in some enormous regulatory hurdles where virtually nobody can mine economically without being a criminal, then they'll slip in and run the pools, hike fees to the moon, and censor any transactions or change the protocol at will.

There is no way to escape these people via the digital domain.  The only way out of the debt based and/or usury system is by physical metals used in native coin form.



1130. Post 19357141 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: FractalUniverse on June 04, 2017, 10:50:57 AM
There is no way to escape these people via the digital domain.  The only way out of the debt based and/or usury system is by physical metals used in native coin form.
What if they decide to confiscate or heavily tax possession of gold and silver one day? there is no escape

The answer to that question is simple.  It's highly cost effective and easy for bankers who have co-opted the government to turn the internet into a police state where all transactions can be tracked, monitored, and gouged for fees, while it takes thousands of orders of magnitude more energy and resources to monitor every square inch of physical space in the real world, as opposed to the digital one.  It's just not doable.  Real freedom is found where it's not economical to establish a police state, not places where it's cheap and easy.



1131. Post 19390888 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Gonna place this prediction here for sake of posterity to look back in a few years:

Quote from: r0ach on June 06, 2017, 06:18:59 AM
Quote from: anonymint
and now we have sound money with blockchains, so goodbye gold/silver.

This will be the dumbest comment you ever make in your life.  Bitcoin is nothing more than a linked list with a get rich quick ponzi scheme built on top of it via halvings.  Calling that sound money is a real knee slapper.  If any random fool can create a linked list with a get rich quick scheme built on top of it in their basement, how is it "sound money"?  It's not.  

The whole thing is a giant rough consensus attack with no Schelling point.  It is NOT solved by "network effect" either due to bitcoin inherently being a highly scalability constrained system from being multiple redundancy and storing everything forever.  Fees will skyrocket and people will move to the next thing rather than face extreme usury.  If everything goes off-chain instead to try and mitigate the fees, it would be no different from the current US dollar.  Yea, you can try and drop the blockchain to lower redundancy and increase scalability like Fuserleer is doing with Emunie, but then it becomes even less sound money (or scale via partial order instead of total order and blackswan the system to death).

This is not like the Cambrian explosion of evolution where a lot of new things appear then it drops off.  People will continuously create hundreds of these things every year to try and scam money from people as long as there's profit in it until the whole system just dilutes to nothingness and collapses.  There will be a million digital scamcoins but still only one gold and silver.  The alternative would be the state forcing draconian legislation on creation of cryptocurrency + running mining pools, etc, but at that point it will be a completely centralized "government coin" with no purpose to exist in the first place.  In the end, most people working on cryptocurrency are just doing free labor R&D for the US govt and international banking cartel.



1132. Post 19391860 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: BiteMyShinyMetalAss on June 06, 2017, 07:39:14 AM
I used to love bitcoin and now i hate it. Its slow, transaction fees are over the roof and it seems there cant be any consensus of future development... Centralised Chinese based mining...Still hold it, but i am disappointed with BTC... very disappointed...

The fact that scalability is low and minining can be cornered by cartels means Bitcoin has been destined to be nothing more than a rent seeking usury system for a LONG TIME NOW.

#thegoyimknow



1133. Post 19407776 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on June 06, 2017, 07:49:15 PM
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/06/mark-cuban-calls-bitcoin-a-bubble-price-falls.html

There you have it folks,  the drop was due to Cuban

Bitcoin is in a bubble when you have Japanese housewives talking about how "grateful they are to find bitcoin scheme because Japanese pensions are failing", but Mark Cuban is a snake that changed his communist Jewish last name (Chabenisky) to pretend to be another race and then shill against white interests while pretending to be white (or implied "cuban").  All you had to do is watch his actions of constant shilling against Trump during the 2016 election to see international organized Jewery in full force shilling against everything they don't control.



1134. Post 19407837 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 06, 2017, 11:59:43 PM
It is very demotivating for me to come into work when in one day I made more money than almost 2 years salary.

You should re-read what you just typed, because there's probably hundreds of people reading your post who have had the exact same feeling with some altcoin before, then they tried to ride the profits higher and they vaporized taking them back to square one.  The fact is, the second any type of life changing profits occur in any asset, the price always craters right after.  What % bitcoin can rise in a short duration before said action occurs is up for debate though.  Having any type of life changing profit occur and then not taking any profit off the table is the definition of insanity.



1135. Post 19408051 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 07, 2017, 12:10:29 AM
It is very demotivating for me to come into work when in one day I made more money than almost 2 years salary.

You should re-read what you just typed, because there's probably hundreds of people reading your post who have had the exact same feeling with some altcoin before, then they tried to ride the profits higher and they vaporized taking them back to square one.  The fact is, the second any type of life changing profits occur, the price always craters right after.  What % bitcoin can rise in a short duration before said action occurs is up for debate though.  Having any type of life changing profit occur and then not taking any profit off the table is the definition of insanity.

Profit in what? A currency that will likely go away in the next 10 years due to a debt bubble and more wars?

I stay at work mainly because it allows me to continue my high risk investment without worry of starving if it goes to zero. If I were to quit I would buy real estate or something that will sustain me for decades.

You've already reached the peak of risk in your high risk investment.  Anyone can click the 2 year chart and see that.  It's an obvious unsustainable bubble and anyone cashing out here will not be missing much.  I imagine it will do something like a 50% retrace off it's base, which would take it to something like $2100, but the pumpers may or may not try to take it a few hundred higher first.  This is literally a textbook pump and dump and it's easy to see from the non-aggregate market movements.  Bitcoin has probably never once behaved as an aggregate market.  Every single move is just some entity like Digital Currency Group trying to manipulate it in a certain direction to profit.




1136. Post 19428715 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Luke-Jr has lost his mind:

Quote from: luke-jr
While I don't agree with everything they do/have done, or their approaches, I don't consider Ethereum to be a scam.

Anything claiming to be a "decentralized currency" and then holds an IPO is obviously a scam.  You can't have an IPO for something claiming to be decentralized because nobody controls the money supply of something "decentralized" by default.  It's literally a 1:1 replica of the movie Wolf of Wall Street and nothing more, or the central banker model who issues currency out of thin air for their own benefit.



1137. Post 19440370 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 08, 2017, 10:43:15 AM
That 'market share' isn't coming back. Crypto has diverged for good no matter how shitty or wobbly the different paths are.

It's because the noble metals are the most suitable thing for use as money on earth, and of those noble metals, gold was the best choice since it doesn't react with oxygen.  Another noble metal is then needed to increase granularity of gold to prevent counter party risk, and silver is the only good candidate there.  

This means there is a functional Schelling point for gold and silver as money, while in cryptocurrency there is actually a REVERSE Schelling point where people are incentivized to branch out and create new ones in order to try and get windfall early adopter profit.  Nobody is able to just walk out and invent a new noble metal, so this doesn't happen there and the Schelling point of gold and silver is preserved.



1138. Post 19440571 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

"Kraken Raises Bitcoin Withdrawal Transaction Fees to $7"

lol, fuck this rent seeking usury system.  

It's going to be interesting to see how many blockchain cheerleaders are left when the transaction fees are like $50 and all transactions are faith based off-chain.  The Gavinator did once say high fees are a great problem to have but I don't think he had this in mind.  Another thing that's always amused me about bitcoin is how they renamed Orwellian police state where all transactions are traced and monitored to "blockchain" and suddenly people thought it was cool.  What's up with that?



1139. Post 19450885 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Torque on June 08, 2017, 09:02:27 PM
Scenario:
Apocalypse happens,

So tired of people claiming gold and silver are only useful during a zombie apocalypse.  The last time I checked, the percent of time metals are used as money is about 4 billion times higher on normal afternoons than mad max scenarios.  As for why everything except silver and gold are trash:

Quote from: r0ach on June 09, 2017, 05:11:34 AM
The real question is, why would anyone use such a thing over gold and silver?  It's blatantly obvious no cryptocurrency is an actual store of value.  How could such a thing be that doesn't even exist in the first place?  That's why it has the word "currency" in the name cryptocurrency and not "money".  All currencies are inherently worthless and go to zero on a long enough timeline, while only gold and silver remains.  Since money is a zero sum game, allowing anyone to pretend to be god and act as a central banker issuing currency for profit is a master and slave dynamic.  Hence anyone not using gold and silver is a slave.

Bitcoin kind of tricked people into thinking it replicated those dynamics of gold and silver, but in reality it's designed to centralize into a rent seeking usury system controlled by mining cartels, and those are the new central bankers.  So the fact still remains, anyone not using gold and silver is a slave.



1140. Post 19450965 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 09, 2017, 05:29:52 AM
^^The master race up in here.  Roll Eyes

Not yet, but soon.




1141. Post 19451093 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

UASF forkers have zero ground to stand on IMO and is really nothing more than a Sybil attack in practice:

Quote from: r0ach on June 09, 2017, 06:07:55 AM
UASF activation would prove in practice that full nodes have power over rogue miners again, and thus the latter can no longer hamper or otherwise hinder Bitcoin development as they have been successfully doing for the last few years. The BIP148 proposal means activation of SegWit without miners' prior consent (or even despite their resistance)

Basically, miners are told to pack their things and go home if they disagree (provided this proposal gets accepted, of course)

Nothing you're saying makes any sense because if you believe there are "rogue miners" or a mining cartel who centrally controls the network, there's obviously no Nash equilibrium and bitcoin has no value in the first place.  One does not simply remove power from the miners without also proclaiming bitcoin a failure at the same time.  You're also claiming a centralized development team should have full control over the chain as well and that the economic incentives that are supposed to make bitcoin work don't work.



1142. Post 19456065 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Watari on June 09, 2017, 08:05:27 AM
who are these douches?

Apparently some goyim who have decided they will not be plundered:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFIuATI0558



1143. Post 19526926 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: deepcolderwallet on June 10, 2017, 12:52:11 AM

My shtf plan is mobility. First sign of bad things coming and I find my next country to live in. And they all take bitcoin.

What do you call a sign of bad things?

Probably when a foreign (((entity))) forms a state within a state of your own nation and controls the media, banks, govt, and election process itself with things like AIPAC while claiming "Russia" is rigging the election.  Wait, that already happened.




1144. Post 19527725 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: bitserve on June 13, 2017, 05:33:19 AM
Don't do it. Remenber "the markets can be irrational much longer than you can remain solvent".

Because "markets" (especially in cryptocurrency) don't exist, just pump and dumps.  Anyone that's been around a long time can remember 3 years ago when there was a series of good news with places like Newegg and Overstock.com announcing they would accept bitcoin and what happens?  The prices goes down each time.  Then suddenly there's a series of bad news recently with things like ETF being rejected, Bitfinex - the market maker exchange since a price of $200 having Gox-like issues, and what happens?  Price goes up for no reason.

Recently the price went from $1200 to $2800 for no reason, then dumps to $1800 for no reason.  None of it was based on any type of fundamentals, aggregate market, or news.  There is no market, it's just however high some guy like Barry Silbert wants to try and raise it before he dumps on you.  Once they can find nobody to continue chasing their pump, they load up on shorts and create a new bear market on purpose, which is also not based on any type of fundamentals.

In practice, generally anything that's not the unit of account of something is nothing more than a pump and dump.  The only unit of account in the past 5000 years of recorded human history that's not catastrophically imploded is gold and silver.



1145. Post 19531442 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on June 13, 2017, 08:21:06 AM
This is me predicting ETH bubble pop and 5B USD flowing to BTC in next 2weeks:

https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/874521946079232000

How dare you infer Vitalik is a scammer for performing a 1:1 replica of the movie Wolf of Wall street, issuing an IPO for a dodgy proof of stake coin without solving any of the issues that make proof of stake not viable, and then issuing another IPO inside the IPO of the unviable coin.



1146. Post 19534603 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on June 13, 2017, 10:14:03 AM
http://pbs.twimg.com/media/DB-9cF8V0AA_aRM.jpg

haha

Is this a good ELI5 of cryptocurrency?

Quote from: r0ach on June 13, 2017, 01:19:28 PM
what is a iota?

It's this thing called cryptocurrency.  Something like gold and silver people buy as a hedge against government except it runs entirely on government infrastructure, with non-obfuscated traffic, on regulated government exchanges, that can then be converted to government money to buy things.



1147. Post 19535005 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Torque on June 13, 2017, 01:29:46 PM
The strange (and somewhat irritating) thing is, these young tech people are running around looking for the "killer app" that will somehow make a new cryptocurrency fly with the masses overnight.

Does Gold need a 'killer app' to serve as a store of value and usage as money? Does Silver need a killer app? No, they really don't. All they need is people's faith/belief in the PM's built-in attributes that make them a good form of money.

It's because like I said before, gold and silver both have a functional Schelling point while cryptocurrency has a REVERSE Schelling point.  Money is a zero sum game so if someone else has more of it, you're basically their slave.  If some guy (Elwar) has hoarded all the bitcoins, what incentive is there for you to honor his super mario tokens and let him buy all the goods on the planet and years of your labor, making you his indentured servant?  Hint:  There is none.

For better or worse, metals facilitate this relationship of power where he who has the gold makes the rules, because a regular human can't just invent a new noble metal (gold and silver) themselves.  It takes two neutron stars colliding to make them.  This is why there is a functional Schelling point in metals as money, because they require the literal power of gawd to create.  On the other hand, just about anyone can create their own cryptocurrency now, so the second some guy hoards more than you or transaction fees get too high, you're extremely incentivized to make a new one until the entire cryptocurrency market eventually dies from dilution (even if it was actually decentralized but it's not) and everyone goes back to gold and silver again.



1148. Post 19535504 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Torque on June 13, 2017, 01:54:48 PM
Money is a zero sum game so if someone else has more of it, you're basically their slave.

r0ach, your statements constantly invalidate your own arguments in favor of PMs. I can guarantee you that the world central banks already own, and will always own (because they control the printed fiat), more gold or silver than you.

So I guess you are forever their slave then.

There is no central bank I know of that (openly) stockpiles silver.  Their somewhat secret groups like the Pilgrims society have actively waged war against it for decades.  While silver was still the unit of account for places like China and India, these central bankers had most of their wealth entirely in gold.  They had the bright idea that by attempting to demonetize silver, they would inadvertently be enriching themselves in the process, transfering that market cap over to them instead.

However, silver has already been gutted as much as possible by their financial manipulation.  There is no money to be made by trying to sabotage it more.  It's quite the opposite.  Now places like India, Russia, China, and random Arab nations who are typically not a part of the western banker crowd are way stocked up on the typical banker asset - gold.  Now you're in the exact opposite position as before.  Western bankers can now screw over their rivals by raising silver to dilute gold instead of trying to manipulate it down.

Regardless of whatever financial warfare they decide to pursue, both metals are trading very close to cost of production, so both will probably skyrocket from what they are now when the wheels fall off the economy, but silver just has way higher upside potential for numerous reasons.



1149. Post 19535761 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Torque on June 13, 2017, 02:19:37 PM
Btw, I hope you know I'm just playing a little devil's advocate with you on PMs. The truth is even with all their manipulation problems, I like PMs and own a little silver myself. I think it would be prudent for anyone that likes Bitcoin to also own a little PM too as a hedge. Historically the silver price is looking pretty good right now. Not sure about the gold price though.

It was always thought that tightness in the silver market would be what led to Comex failure and not gold, but I think the gold market is honestly more tight now entirely because there are price insensitive buyers in the form of...the nation states of China and Russia that just print money and gobble the stuff up.  

It's still possible that silver ends up breaking the fractional reserve bank, so to speak, but there were informal treaties in the past where nation states were not allowed to wade into the metals market and cause a run that both Russia and China seem to be not adhering to and will likely hasten some huge overnight forced revaluation where anyone who had metals the day before is now rich.  Whichever one is the domino doesn't really matter.  Both would be way up while silver will have the higher percentage gains in the end.



1150. Post 19546590 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: kromtar on June 13, 2017, 03:24:08 PM
In the future we will be sucking our entire sun energy to mine a tiny fraction of the already existing 21 mill of bitcoins, while a fleet of mining space ships will be dumping tons of fresh infinite precious metals in the market.  Shocked

This is basically the exact opposite of what will happen.  Nobody will ever be building Dyson spheres to mine bitcoin because anyone with the power and funds to do such a thing can just as easily fork bitcoin and build a bigger buy side and you will witness bitcoin's reverse Schelling point in action.  There is no real incentive for everyone to stay on the same chain and be enslaved by whoever managed to acquire more coins than you.  Some will claim the network effect enforces this paradigm, but it obviously doesn't apply to bitcoin.

The network effect makes assumptions like infinite scalability, which bitcoin doesn't have, and that there would be some type of actual cost or roadblock in creating a competitor, but there's not.  Network effect only works for gold and silver because a normal human is incapable of fabricating a new noble metal out of thin air.  In that case it is not really network effect, more like forced convergence.



1151. Post 19576777 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Shields engaged




1152. Post 19592438 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: spooderman on June 15, 2017, 03:29:27 PM
(Do I have to explain why larger blocks create runaway centralisation?)

You wot m8?

Bitcoin is already designed to centralize regardless of what the block size is because energy costs on the globe are not uniform, giving you some type of sparse grid/matrix covering the earth like this:



Such a centralization factor could be survivable if this was the only negative variable built into the system, but then ASICs came along to give you a secondary, multiplicative, negative effect and turning that matrix into something like this:



The creation of ASICs was the doomsday event and now you just have a cartel controlled rent seeking usury system with no hint of any type of Nash equilibrium.  I don't believe this gives any credence to Lauda or UASF forker's "proof of node" scheme, which is just a backdoor Sybil attack, it just means proof of work is pointless if you can't defeat ASICs and have a system always mineable by commodity hardware that can't be "cornered" so to speak.  (proof of stake has also always been pointless with no value, don't even mention it)

The third variable about proof of work I left out:  economy of scale.  There are arguments economy of scale would also terminally centralize bitcoin, but then there's a few contradictory arguments like the waste heat being useful for a water heater or something.  Some seem to think the waste heat would only be useful on a small scale, but I imagine industry would figure out a way to make better use of it eventually whether it's running a green house or other obscure scenario.



1153. Post 19595003 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Torque on June 16, 2017, 11:02:00 AM
But I would disagree that their is no community.

In the same way, it can be said that Goldbugs or Silverbugs are a community.  Same can be said with communities that form around other private money like the Totnes pound.

If you click on bitcoin vs precious metals youtube videos, for bitcoin it's all about trying to smash and grab some pump and dump profits, while metals talk is usually more forward thinking and pragmatic:




1154. Post 19627675 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Place your bets on the bitcoin head and shoulders:



*Although if anyone actually bothered to short it, they would just get squeezed and price would go higher because nothing about this market is actually real, it just goes wherever there is someone to squeeze.



1155. Post 19627778 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: andyatcrux on June 18, 2017, 08:18:42 AM
They often try to get people margin called on their longs too, to further push it down. A bunch of liquidations occurred about 10 minutes ago. May be time to go up again.

There is no bitcoin market.  Every single move from $200 to $800 (besides some halving element) was entirely a short squeeze.  The market didn't move an inch unless there was someone to squeeze.  Only recently has that paradigm changed somewhat, but it will probably fall back into that old state again where the price only goes in a direction in which a manipulator can fuck over someone.



1156. Post 19628125 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on June 18, 2017, 08:21:18 AM
Last time r0ach was talking about a bearish head and shoulders bitcoin went from $1100 to $3000.

Nah, I said the chart looked bearish and then Scamfinex turned off withdrawals, forcing all sellers to become buyers while also squeezing every short in existence, which artifically pumped the market higher.  Then people saw that rise and thought the cup and handle pattern was in play and just kept pumping it higher.  It was pretty much the perfect storm of Finex manipulation that was not based on any type of fundamentals or news or anything.  

It's much harder to repeat such pumps when the transaction fees are out of control though.  I imagined bitcoin growth would slow down tremendously once transaction fees got to around $2 and excess traffic would leave with Litecoin being the main beneficiary, so with current bitcoin fees spiking to the moon and some exchanges charging $7 transaction fees, that's what is happening.



1157. Post 19635354 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: Icygreen on June 18, 2017, 03:50:33 PM
Any ideas why the exchanges are speculating a drop to 1723 in the short term? http://www.bitcoinforecast.com
Although this is not always correct, bitstamp nailed the most recent drop within a few bucks. 

What a bunch of fucktards having an anti-trump disclaimer on their site.  The label has the typical "trump be raycist" statement, but all the word racist means nowadays is white people that refuse to be cuckolds for brown people.



1158. Post 19645547 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: St.Stephan on June 18, 2017, 08:37:28 PM
Any ideas why the exchanges are speculating a drop to 1723 in the short term? http://www.bitcoinforecast.com
Although this is not always correct, bitstamp nailed the most recent drop within a few bucks.  

What a bunch of fucktards having an anti-trump disclaimer on their site.  The label has the typical "trump be raycist" statement, but all the word racist means nowadays is white people that refuse to be cuckolds for brown people.

No, racism has not narrowed itself down to fit your narrative of it.

Honestly, I respect your trading posts. I think they are well written and show insight. But whatever politics you have, you would never trade them -  and your skin color -  for being a black person getting stopped by a white cop. Would you.

The world is a place with lots of incompatible people, religions, and cultures.  There is no purpose in practicing Marxism and trying to force them all together so they all kill each other.  Black leaders in the past like Malcom X and Marcus Garvey knew this, that's why they advocated "Pan-Africanism", which essentially means forming a nation state in Africa with blacks only run by blacks because that's the only way you will have any type of self determination.

If you click the wikipedia link of what this is, it's essentially black naziism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-Africanism

Replace the word "black" with "white" in any of those sentences and suddenly people would have heart palpatations claiming "omg dat be raycist!", but leave the word black there and it's perfectly fine and great!  This is called a double standard, promoting and allowing nationalism for other races while attempting to demonize whites who do the same thing.  White people are no longer putting up with garbage like this of letting Jewish Marxists who control the media tell us how we can act or think.  Their propaganda is now 100% dead and powerless.

It's well known that any nation without an ethnocentric majority collapses.  This is why nations like China and Japan still exist after hundreds or thousands of years, because it's 99% asian people.  Diversity is not "strength"; diversity is weakness and conflict.  The only reason the jews running the media push this garbage is because the history of their existence is moving into a foreign country, forming a state within a state to the detriment of the native inhabitants, practicing insane usury on them, then being expelled from the  country.  This is why they've been kicked out of countries over 100 times now.  It's not other people's fault, it's their own fault.

This is why Europe is being flooded with 3rd worlders right now - a divide and conquer strategy.  Any homogeneous nation on a long enough timeline will always expel or kill the usury banking parasites that infect them.  If you flood the country with a bunch of different warring factions, it's more difficult for anyone to come together for common interests to fix anything or get rid of them.  Those muslims in Europe are being weaponized by the Jews to try and destabilize nations on purpose.  Just like how in America, Jews try to weaponize minorities to fight against whites for them.

Guess who owns all the violent, anti-white rap labels?

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/Entertainment_News_5/article_8500.shtml

I hate to break it to you, but there's only 3 real powers in this world right now:  whites, jews, and asians.  Everyone else is just some type of pawn or insignificant bystander while the murderous death cult known as international zionism actively plots against everyone else.



1159. Post 19649035 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Jimmy Song is here...to get you to convert all your bitcoin immediately to litecoin...

http://medium.com/@jimmysong/examining-bitmains-press-release-6b47b0646f15



1160. Post 19649893 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: St.Stephan on June 18, 2017, 08:37:28 PM
"I am the only living witness but I must say the truth. Contrary to the opinion of the National Socialists, that the Jews were a highly organized group, the appalling fact was that they had no organization whatsoever. The mass of the Jewish people were taken complete by surprise. They did not know at all what to do; they had no directives or slogans as to how they should act. This is the greatest lie of anti-Semitism because it gives the lie to that old slogan that the Jews are conspiring to dominate the world and that they are so highly organized. In reality, they had no organization of their own at all, not even an information service. If they had had some sort of organization, these people could have been saved by the millions, but instead, they were taken completely by surprise. Never before has a people gone as unsuspectingly to its disaster. Nothing was prepared. Absolutely nothing."
- Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski

Because they're a paper tiger:  a bunch of frail and helpless Woody Allen-like people who have no power besides financial manipulation and media propaganda - which is a highly destructive power capable of ruining nations - but once you take that power away, are in no way equipped to deal with the enormous blowback they create and are instantly destroyed.  Don't live by the sword if you're not prepared to die by the sword.

What you're describing is also known as collective punishment.  Yes, not all of those people are actively plotting to screw over everyone else, but the fact remains that if you REFUSE to police your own kind and let them act like psychopaths constantly trying to drain everyone's wealth through usury and manipulate society with destructive media propaganda, you force the other side into making the Machiavellian choice of, "welp, I can either live as a slave or wipe out the slave masters entirely".  

History will repeat once again, because once again they have refused to police their own kind while citing their Talmudic religious texts that claim non-Jews are "goyim cattle" who are below jews and meant to serve them.  In case you haven't noticed, Christianity is mostly a benign religion nowadays, while both Judaism and Islam are still outwardly hostile death cults to anyone they come in contact with.

Quote from: St.Stephan on June 18, 2017, 08:37:28 PM
The world is a place with lots of incompatible people, religions, and cultures.

The only incompatibility stems from being afraid of what's different.

Bullshit.  Different just means "diversity", which is just a synonym for "less white people" or "white genocide".  I notice you aren't walking around in China or Africa amongst the 99.9% Chinese or African population and complaining to them that it's not "diverse" enough.  No, uttering propaganda words like that simply means you're an anti-white Marxist.  It's honestly amazing white people fell for that propaganda for such a long time, but now it doesn't work anymore and you're just identifying yourself immediately as a hostile enemy combatant by uttering such words.



1161. Post 19656246 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: bitserve on June 19, 2017, 06:47:35 PM
Today is a happy day. We are finally very close to a non-contentious solution for the scaling drama of this past years.

Totally wrong.  Nothing has changed at all and it's still the same old parties having the same old positions.  A contentious Chinese/Jihan Wu fork (only with Barry Silbert added to the mix) vs the other Bitcoin core people:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCTgqEBXYAQBgNI.jpg:large

If you're trying to trade this, it's leaning far more towards a fork disaster than non-contentious fork.

*disclaimer:  I am neither attempting to long or short it myself.



1162. Post 19669715 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on June 20, 2017, 05:00:57 AM
wake up buddy....
bitmain is MY/Our voice.

driven by the need for workable progress, and not by the pipe-dream ivory tower ideal of perfection.

STAND UP MY FRIENDS

BACK US!!

lets make history together. lets make this thing thing happen the way WE WANT IT TO!

Once more unto the breach my friends




1163. Post 19676086 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: bitserve on June 20, 2017, 07:17:16 PM
Today is a happy day. We are finally very close to a non-contentious solution for the scaling drama of this past years.

Totally wrong.  Nothing has changed at all and it's still the same old parties having the same old positions.  A contentious Chinese/Jihan Wu fork (only with Barry Silbert added to the mix) vs the other Bitcoin core people:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCTgqEBXYAQBgNI.jpg:large

If you're trying to trade this, it's leaning far more towards a fork disaster than non-contentious fork.

*disclaimer:  I am neither attempting to long or short it myself.

Can you elaborate more on your point? I have already read that and many other twitter/reddit comments that have been posted for the past months.

Let's focus on current status:

- It looks like Segwit2x will pass, maybe even with almost 100% miner support.
- Segwit2x includes Segwit: Good.
- Segwit2x includes a 2MB block size increase soon after: Good. I hate HF's but an almost unanimous HF for a fixed reasonable 2x increase is also ok to me. More so if it is executed with almost 100% miner support.
- I see it as a reasonable compromise. Also, and most importantly, it is PERCEIVED as a reasonable compromise for most of the parties in this "battle".
- It avoids BU, which is an ABOMINATION.
- It avoids UASF, which could be a fucking disaster.

Well, I could go on... But... can you tell me whats the wrong thing about this move?

I don't see why it is "the same old parties having the same old positions". Why do you consider so?

Disclaimer: I am not exactly trying to trade this... But it will for sure influence my trades which, anyway, are almost all the time long for the majority of my trading funds. I only do actively trade a little portion around 25-30% to keep increasing my long term stash.


Roach, you did not reply me to enlighten me in what way I was wrong in this. ANyway, It's unnecesary you do it now, as it looks I was not "totally wrong" but instead totally right on my prospect.

My point was that it's not a "non-contentious" fork.  It's still the same situation on the ground as the last 2 years with nothing really having changed.  It doesn't matter if all the Chinese miners signal they want to hard fork because they all agreed they wanted to do that years ago.  So once again...what exactly has changed?  Pretty much nothing.  It's still Bitcoin core vs Roger Ver and Jihan Wu as usual.  The only thing that's changed at all is Barry Silbert got drunk and took a boat over to the Guangdong province and was like "hey guys, I heard you like pump and dumps??? me too???"



1164. Post 19686034 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: AlexGR on June 21, 2017, 05:54:37 AM
Core devs support for Segwit 2x (check on the right): https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Segwit_support

I'm not sure how anyone could be bullish right now after clicking that because the situation resembles segwit2x being some type of rogue china fork while there's also a big head and shoulders pattern at the same time.  As for the head and shoulders pattern, markets don't actually exist and the price will just go in whichever direction there is someone to squeeze whether it's a long or short.  So if someone goes in heavy shorting, it will go up.  If someone bets the farm on a long, it will crash.



1165. Post 19715641 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 22, 2017, 03:21:52 PM
dips rule everything around me - dream, get the money  bitty bitty bills y'all

Torque is in the place to order pizzas with haste.  They say my man Jay Juan Gee is on freebase.  JimboToronto was a friend of mine, till I caught him trying to steal from the dogecoin mine.



1166. Post 19727426 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Post about current cryptocurrency dotcom bubble in relation to bitcoin vs altcoins and reference to video games industry:

http://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-15-the-current-cryptocurrency-dotcom-bubble-will-it-play-crysis



1167. Post 19735883 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

I love how all these people talk about bitcoin becoming the world reserve currency worth 5 quadrillion dollars each without touching on the scalability factor at all, or the fact that it's designed to completely centralize, thus defeating the entire purpose in the first place.  Yet, completely centralized and with no scalability, let's talk about how bitcoin is going to "defeat gold"!



1168. Post 19736382 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Torque on June 23, 2017, 07:09:25 PM
I love how all these people talk about bitcoin becoming the world reserve currency worth 5 quadrillion dollars each without touching on the scalability factor at all, or the fact that it's designed to completely centralize, thus defeating the entire purpose in the first place.  Yet, completely centralized and with no scalability, let's talk about how bitcoin is going to "defeat gold"!

Bitcoin is not trying to "defeat" Gold. Gold is technically no longer money either.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/precious-metals/gold/did-gold-survive-the-depression/

You cited a complete fraud that said gold was going to collapse below $1000 like a year ago, then he gets called out on it and claims otherwise.  What this asshole does is he creates a spam of predictions, often ones that completely contradict one another, so no matter what happens he claims he's right. 

Before going to jail Armstrong gave all the same numbers as everyone else, that they will likely be forced to re-integrate metals into the currency which would bring gold to at least $20,000 an ounce at 40% backing.  Then he gets out of jail and mysteriously says "$5000 gold will be the top no matter what!".  So even with this guy shilling against metals now as some type of govt stooge, his bearish view would still bring enormous profits in things like silver (which is really just a leveraged play on gold).



1169. Post 19747547 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Torque on June 23, 2017, 07:47:53 PM
But in terms of how crashes go, the dollar has always been the best temporary safe haven. Anyone that says otherwise apparently can't read historical charts. Commodities have dived during crashes including precious metals. I expect that Bitcoin will take a temporary tumble as well, but I guess we shall see. It'll of course rally if banks start to fail and we get more QE.

I've always believed, long before Jim Rickards wrote his new book, that the next crash you will NOT be able to just go all-in on cash beforehand and buy the dip.  All those banks funds and money markets will be frozen, and depositors probably forced to bail-in under the "citibank clause".  I just don't see any plausible scenario in which going all-in cash is a good idea.  Also a good chance they do something like a 50% currency devaluation overnight like the 1998 Korean won deval:



This will be the crash in which metals holders become rich somewhere along the way, and god knows what the hell will happen to bitcoin.  Cryptocurrency scalability is really too low to even talk about being some big part of the next financial crash.  What are you gonna do, have a bunch of commoners pile in buying $10,000 worth of bitcoin and then paying a $1000 transaction fee just to move it?




1170. Post 19748127 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on June 24, 2017, 01:23:52 PM
its bitcoin talk.




1171. Post 19748633 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Torque on June 24, 2017, 02:02:10 PM
I kinda took Blitz's advice here, and glad I did. 24 hr volume has fallen to 50% of what it was a few days ago. Failure to break 2750 with any real momentum. Then it flattened sideways at 2700 (always a sign for a sudden move). Technicals signaling a retest of previous levels.

It's been pretty damn obvious where this was going for a while (i love bitcoinity for just figuring out what the current macro view is):

Quote from: r0ach on June 18, 2017, 08:15:13 AM
Place your bets on the bitcoin head and shoulders:





1172. Post 19749602 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: blade87 on June 24, 2017, 03:11:37 PM
The low volume made the market feel exhausted to me. And if ETH doesn't hold $300, it's going to start a domino effect and it will get very ugly in the altcoin market.

Please, so many shills pretending the fate of BTC and ETH are tied together.  Complete nonsense.  Eth is a scam that was launched as a proof of stake coin without them solving ANY of the problems that make proof of stake not viable.  It was always doomed to fail.  Eth was like launching the Titanic with a hole already in it.  I think all cryptocurrency will eventually die since none of it is actually decentralized and that's what it's value is supposed to be based on, but bitcoin will probably be able to fool people longer than Eth.



1173. Post 19750044 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Consumer adoption imminent at 3 TPS !



1174. Post 19754480 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Icygreen on June 24, 2017, 08:49:46 PM
Has anyone's coinbase account been upped today? Mine increased 4x  .... hmmm......

They invented this new thing called World of Warcraft gold.  It has 1000x higher tps, much lower transaction fees, and faster confirmation times than BTC.



1175. Post 19754791 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on June 24, 2017, 05:38:25 PM
I've no idea why everybody else hate them so much, I've been trading/withdrawing/depositing at Poloniex for months and never have had any issues at all.

I can confirm, withdrew from Bologniex when BTC was $2700 to buy some silver and withdrawal took a minute or two.



1176. Post 19761169 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Searing on June 25, 2017, 04:29:31 AM
IF IT all goes PEARSHAPED

and splits and a cluster of bitmain coin and the rest of the FUD

Bitcoin will drop below 1K usd imho




1177. Post 19763859 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: yefi on June 25, 2017, 11:12:53 AM
Insert montage here of Marcus pushing the kid's bike, flying a kite with him, etc.




1178. Post 19765710 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Torque on June 25, 2017, 02:42:03 PM
I'd call this a bad sign. This same kid's story got trotted out at the height of the last bubble in 2013. Along with the story of a EU guy that found bitcoin on an old hard drive that he paid $27, then at the time in 2013 they were suddenly worth $886k. I think the news said he bought a condo or something.
http://www.maxkeiser.com/2013/10/man-buys-27-of-bitcoin-forgets-about-them-finds-theyre-now-worth-886k/

These kinds of stories I call the "sucker" stories, that get trotted out by the MSM so that the fence sitters finally cave and invest into Bitcoin right into a bubble and eventual downturn.

Stay wary my friends.

And no, I'm not trolling. I'm a permabull still 90% in who has been through these Bitcoin cycles before, and have seen how this market works.  Remember, the MSM is no friend to Bitcoin.

Re-buy at $200 then we can start all over again?



1179. Post 19768326 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on June 25, 2017, 05:36:39 PM
It's only become exceptionally bullish since the start of this year when it broke the ATH. I'm hoping that within another year we get a 1000% increase on today's price.

BTC is topped out for a long time IMO.  My post from exactly one year ago looks like it just about ran it's entire maximum range:

Quote from: r0ach on June 02, 2016, 05:52:47 PM




1180. Post 19778786 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 25, 2017, 10:31:20 PM
Where we go from there, is a choice I leave to you.




1181. Post 19778957 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on June 26, 2017, 08:19:05 AM
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/YRZvdurN-The-target-of-current-bubble-lays-between-40k-and-110k/

Nice "the price will exponentially increase forever for no reason and everyone will pay $10,000 transaction fees" chart.  If every millionaire on earth hedged 1% of their money in bitcoin the price would be $7800 each with a fully liquid market (so more like $70,000/ea in distorted normal market metrics with non-liquid market cap).  This situation is not actually possible with anything less than probably 50+ TPS though (compared to 3 TPS now).  

I don't think creating a decentralized lightning network is even possible because you'd need to put all channel closings in a centralized que, or risk black swans blowing up the system (or permanent attack vector), so lightning network doesn't really satisfy this scaling requirement.  Payment channels are useful, but mostly for bank-like entities doing constant transfers back and forth, just not for smaller end user people (where the TPS increase is actually needed).  Payment channels would take some burden off the chain, but it's not a real substitute for the on-chain scaling.

So no, I don't see bitcoin going to the moon at 3 TPS or 3 TPS + payment channels.  The transaction fees have skyrocketed between $2-10 already, which puts up a big roadblock to further price appreciation, and I don't really see a valid scaling solution to fix it.  Also taking into account PoW is designed to centralize into a monopoly in the first place (and proof of stake is useless), so bitcoin really needs massive overhauls on almost every level before it can even be claimed to be decentralized or scale to be useful to the world at large.



1182. Post 19785218 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):





1183. Post 19785741 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: micalith on June 26, 2017, 04:29:16 PM
unhappy hodler. I hate this freefall shit

I'm running through the house looking under every couch cushion praying:  holy shit, I hope there's not any bitcoin under here I forgot to dump.



1184. Post 19785852 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: promomei on June 26, 2017, 04:37:32 PM
I love how the group of manipulators doing this with crypto world -
Pure people  Grin

Don't say the r0ach report didn't warn you.  When there's no upside left in anything, it's time to take the elevator down:

http://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-15-the-current-cryptocurrency-dotcom-bubble-will-it-play-crysis



1185. Post 19786028 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: becoin on June 26, 2017, 04:47:40 PM

Don't say the r0ach report didn't warn you.

r0ach reports are warning us since bitcoin was $400.

I haven't really commented on bitcoin price forecast lately.  My last real bitcoin price comment was this and that it was a buy then:

https://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/bitcoin-market-in-one-picture-without-commentary



I've spent a lot of time studying Chinese traders.  They're pretty damn easy to predict.  It's kind of like the real world:  high efficiency, no originality.  They will also set money on fire for no reason solely to try and trick people even when it serves no purpose whatsoever because their moves will be too obvious to fool anyone.  They still go through the motions anyway as if they're reading from a checklist titled "how to scam people".



1186. Post 19786311 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 26, 2017, 04:59:12 PM
They want us all in sliver

The seasonal market of metals means late June to early July is usually the low/best buy in point of the year, then it turns bull market right at the start of August.  That Cliff High guy claimed silver would explode in August due to his web bot nonsense powers, but I coulda told you it would probably rise in August just because that's it's historical nature.  The banks know they have to cover shorts before it gets to that point, and there's been an enormous amount of open interest, so it probably will explode upward in the near future.



1187. Post 19786584 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: e-coinomist on June 26, 2017, 05:15:12 PM
Start of bubble: March, somewhere 900 bucks

But once we go back there investor's disappointment will never recover again, as it did in the Gox aftermath. This will just break Bitcoin's neck.
ETH will have to continue the story, developping the technology further.

Eth is useless.  If proof of stake was viable or had any value, bitcoin would already be using it.  Vitalik created Eth and just pretended he would fix PoS later, but there is no fix.  He never believed bitcoin had any value when he first heard of it.  He doesn't really believe eth has value either, but that didn't stop him from creating a 30 billion dollar Ponzi scheme:




1188. Post 19788192 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

The bloodbath has not even begun for Ethbutters.



1189. Post 19789918 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: orpington on June 26, 2017, 07:10:43 PM
wonder if anyone actually shat their pants due to bitcoin - lol




1190. Post 19791983 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Market is almost entirely controlled by one entity (Bitmain).  Whenever the price plummets to key resistance points, a single market rigger puts up a $2 million wall to try and block it from going lower.  Coincidence?  I'm just amazed people are trying so hard to prop up this bubble.  There was plenty of warning and time to sell, so it seems like the only people who would put forth so much effort to prop it up are the Chinese mining cartel.




1191. Post 19800521 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Anyone notice this thread has 1/10th the traffic of past rises and dumps?  I think this is a sign of the fact that there's no reason for cryptocurrency to exist unless you can create an ASIC proof algo where coins can be mined on commodity hardware, or constantly change the algo to defeat them.  Without doing that, the draught of new people coming in signals the date of ASIC creation as the start of the coin's eventual death.  If this thread is any indicator of the system at large, Bitcoin is like a brown dwarf star running on fuel from a prior era.  

The only thing keeping it going at all is that some PoW altcoins are used as proxies for new people to occasionally enter.  Those altcoins are generally only profitable to mine during bull runs, so it also has the side effect of making bubbles larger and bear markets even more bearish.  This phenomenon is why you always see proof of stake coins wither and die like clockwork as well.



1192. Post 19802611 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Torque on June 27, 2017, 01:16:30 PM
This guy gets it. The blockchain's (er, Bitcoin's) killer app is Bitcoin.

Or the govt creating a federated chain to enslave you with a cashless society slave system, pick one.



1193. Post 19806310 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: YourMother on June 27, 2017, 05:19:20 PM
Anyone notice this thread has 1/10th the traffic of past rises and dumps?  I think this is a sign of the fact that there's no reason for cryptocurrency to exist unless you can create an ASIC proof algo where coins can be mined on commodity hardware, or constantly change the algo to defeat them.  Without doing that, the draught of new people coming in signals the date of ASIC creation as the start of the coin's eventual death.  If this thread is any indicator of the system at large, Bitcoin is like a brown dwarf star running on fuel from a prior era.  

The only thing keeping it going at all is that some PoW altcoins are used as proxies for new people to occasionally enter.  Those altcoins are generally only profitable to mine during bull runs, so it also has the side effect of making bubbles larger and bear markets even more bearish.  This phenomenon is why you always see proof of stake coins wither and die like clockwork as well.

Look, scumbag! It was fun to troll Bitcoin, but back in 2013-2015 during all the bans, the fud and the panicked bears, not now after a 10x growth in price and userbase. The reason why Bitcoin is not worth over $200k right now is because of the ignorance of the masses. You are witnessing a world changing protocol, which time and time again has proved its security and robustness, that is about to decentralize everything that can be decentralized, and whose network value is not even half of Bill Gate's fortune at this moment.

LOL What a load of shit.  You just typed a few pages ago how you spammed this forum with "bear trolling" under alternate usernames fucking with everyone trying to get them to dump in the past.  Now you're caught on the wrong side of the trade and don't want anyone saying the price might go down.  This head and shoulders collapse was so obvious whoever got caught in it shouldn't be trading in the first place.  I even posted it here for you all to see.  

And no, bitcoin is not better than gold and silver.  Gold and silver are money and everything else is credit.  Bitcoins are imaginary coupons you hope someone else will service in exchange for goods and services at a future date.  This makes them unsecured liabilities.  With a real commodity currency like gold and silver, it doesn't matter if you can find nobody to service your coins, you still have the actual  coins themselves which have usage in industry and other things, meaning you're never left holding the bag because there's always some type of use for them (especially silver).

Antonopolous propaganda claiming bitcoin is better than metals doesn't actually work against people who know anything about economics.



1194. Post 19807139 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: keithers on June 27, 2017, 06:35:29 PM
This would mean cheaper coins

Quote from: keithers on June 27, 2017, 06:35:29 PM
cheaper coins

Quote from: keithers on June 27, 2017, 06:35:29 PM
cheaper coins

I've never once heard this phrase before!  Only in bitcoin is it considered good no matter if the price goes up or down...



1195. Post 19807421 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Dakustaking76 on June 27, 2017, 07:18:47 PM
Roach

I think you Dont have a Life  Roll Eyes
If bitcoin Goes down, we tried to get rich And a better Life.
But what Did you do? Just posting here shit comments And nothing fuck.

I suggest you to find a Life Below the Rocks ore blow your self.
Why? Beceause you was pussy to Spend money on bitcoin.

So Any comments left?

English?  Do you speak it?



1196. Post 19809710 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: megashira1 on June 27, 2017, 08:15:38 PM
According to Clif High we are to begin going parabolic come late June .. Is this the beginning of the road to $13k ?

The market moves wherever there is a large long or short for the exchange owners to front run their clients and squeeze.  If Cliff High wants the price to go up, he better take out a large short.



1197. Post 19811775 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 27, 2017, 08:28:28 PM
bears looking ugly again ... and all the usual full of shit trolls crawling out from their roach holes spewing golden lies.

Looks like Marcus is hallucinating after being exposed to a little too much digital rat poison.  For every dollar bankers spend trying to supress the price of gold and silver, an equal amount of money is spent trying to prop the bitcoin bubble up.  The same people are fully capable of raising or crashing both assets, yet they allow bitcoin to rise while trying to crash the other and allowing all the sheeple to pile into this one.  Yea, that's not fishy at all!  It's blatantly obvious the R3 group of bankers props up the Ethereum scamcoin on Poloniex too.  They don't even try to hide it.  

Stop pretending 'designed to centralize' bitcoin is somehow "defeating" the bankers.  The only way you're beating the bankers is by dumping this imaginary bubble asset that doesn't function as a store of value and purchasing what they don't want you to buy - gold or silver.  They're desperately trying to ban cash and force people into a digital only slave system, so cryptocurrency is just subsidizing your own eventual enslavement with how easy it is for them to co-opt bitcoin.



1198. Post 19812444 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on June 28, 2017, 02:11:46 AM
If the "Powers that be" can and do on a regular basis as you put it, crash the price of gold/silver, then how are any investments in gold or silver a proper store of value?

They play Keynesianism in the commodities market and naked short metals down trying to cap them at like 5-10% above cost of production.  This means they're usually a good buy in general since you're getting them practically at cost, with the price being almost entirely a derivative of oil.  Oil EROI is currently collapsing, which will soon collapse the ability to manipulate metals.

As for bitcoin, bitcoin cost of production is floating - recursive based on it's own demand.  Bankers don't naked short metals below cost of production because it's counterintuitive and would create enormous scarcity.  It would also bankrupt miners, creating even more scarcity, so they try to rig it right above production cost.  

However, if bankers ever want to naked short bitcoin, it's VERY productive since they can easily play a war of attrition and literally delete any price floor which they cannot do in metals.  Metals actually have a cost of production price floor and bitcoin doesn't.  They can drag the bitcoin cost of production floor down from $10,000 each all the way to $1 if they want to.  That's something you can never do in metals.  The only thing that could stop them from doing so in bitcoin is if it became the unit of account of something, but since like I said, it doesn't function as a store of value having no price floor, it's unlikely to happen when better alternatives like metals exist that actually can function as a store of value.

Quote from: bitserve on June 28, 2017, 02:19:29 AM
Am I wrong or to store $1Mill in silver one would need almost 2.000KG of silver?

Weight is irrelevant in current state.  It just means you will make more money when the GSR collapses closer to historical levels (15:1) when their Comex rigging blows up.  It's like claiming, "o god, buying 100 pounds of gold is too heavy for $10 an ounce".  No, nothing is too heavy if you get a good deal on it.



1199. Post 19812622 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on June 28, 2017, 03:07:24 AM
Can you describe the mechanism that "they" would use to drag the price floor of a Bitcoin to $1? Who is "they"?

Already did, war of attrition.  Miners will not mine at a loss forever.  They just tank the price on exchanges and then miners either immediately turn off their machines or do a few weeks later.  If you look at things like litecoin hash rate vs price lately, these Chinese are turning on and off machines almost immediately as price fluctuates.  

Once they tank the price on exchanges either with real coins or synthetic derivatives, even if cost of production of a coin was once $10,000, there is no reason to pay that anymore since you can mine a never ending stream of coins as transaction fees for however low they want to tank the cost of production to.  It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that bitcoin has no price floor, does not function as a store of value, and is much easier to destroy by financial manipulation than gold or silver are.



1200. Post 19820304 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on June 28, 2017, 03:38:56 AM
Can you describe the mechanism that "they" would use to drag the price floor of a Bitcoin to $1? Who is "they"?

Already did, war of attrition.  Miners will not mine at a loss forever.  They just tank the price on exchanges and then miners either immediately turn off their machines or do a few weeks later.  If you look at things like litecoin hash rate vs price lately, these Chinese are turning on and off machines almost immediately as price fluctuates.  

Once they tank the price on exchanges either with real coins or synthetic derivatives, even if cost of production of a coin was once $10,000, there is no reason to pay that anymore since you can mine a never ending stream of coins as transaction fees for however low they want to tank the cost of production to.  It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that bitcoin has no price floor, does not function as a store of value, and is much easier to destroy by financial manipulation than gold or silver are.

 Does it take a rocket scientist to tell me who "they" are?  Who is going to tank the price to begin this war of attrition?

The same people who dump 2 billion dollars of synthetic gold naked shorts all at once to try and tank gold while the CFTC watches in broad daylight doing nothing about it because it's govt sanctioned.  If govt ever sanctions financial attacks on bitcoin, it will crumple far easier than the metals market due to reasons I already discussed.  But that seems to be the opposite right now.  Right now the govt wants you to buy bitcoin and not buy gold or silver.  The main question you should be asking yourself is why that is.



1201. Post 20056487 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on July 09, 2017, 10:31:37 AM
I predict a sharp uptick in btc price in the NEXT 24 HOURS!!




1202. Post 20063282 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Wexlike on July 10, 2017, 11:28:48 PM
That is a pretty heavy drop currently.

Ether is tanking brutally.

The cryptocurrency market has been pure garbage for a while now.  Some big group(s) whether it's R3 or Digital Currency Group or both first pumps BTC, then pumps all alts one by one, then pulls the plug on everything simultaneously after they run out of fools to buy their pumps.  You know damn well the Poloniex staff are involved as accomplices in the pump and dumps too.  Anytime I mentioned a coin that I knew was going to rise in the troll box and told people to buy it, the mods went ballistic.

But it doesn't stop there.  You see, the R3 banker dirtbags favor Ethereum as their scamcoin of choice since they own it all, so they pumped Eth to the moon and then put up big ask walls in both Litecoin and Monero and a few other coins to try and prevent people from doing anything in those markets to try and get people back into Eth to buy their overpriced scamcoin pump.  This whole market is a giant criminal racket led by R3, DGC, Poloniex staff and a few others (maybe some guys like Pantera Capital but not sure about them).  Poloniex even adjusted their fee structure to give the R3/DGC pumpers no fees for high volume wash trading.

To make things even worse, when they pull the plug on BTC + alts, they let everything implode while putting up giant support walls on Ethereum so that each market implosion always has Ethereum gaining ground in market share compared to bitcoin and all other alts.  Vitalik should be public enemy #1 for helping the bankers attempt to take over cryptocurrency.  As for me, I don't really give a shit.  I was dumping bitcoins for silver as fast as possible from $2700 to $2500 because no cryptocurrency created thus far (and probably ever) actually improves upon metals in any way besides how fast you can dump them.  



1203. Post 20076908 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: empowering on July 11, 2017, 11:25:36 AM
snip

because no cryptocurrency created thus far (and probably ever) actually improves upon metals in any way
  

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Here you go young shekler, this episode of the r0ach report is dedicated to you:

The r0ach report 18: The great PoW lie

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-18-the-great-pow-lie



1204. Post 20079375 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: empowering on July 12, 2017, 12:33:54 AM
snip

because no cryptocurrency created thus far (and probably ever) actually improves upon metals in any way
  

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Here you go young shekler, this episode of the r0ach report is dedicated to you:

The r0ach report 18: The great PoW lie

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-18-the-great-pow-lie

I am touched.

You say that cryptocurrency does not improve on metals in any way?

I shall make you a deal- if you can send me 1 Ounce of Gold to arrive to me in the next hour- I shall pay you  $10,000 (because thats how much I loves me some gold)  for it in Bitcoin which should likewise arrive within the hour? Sounds like a fair deal to me.

It's not a valid argument.  It's like complaing about the speed of light existing, while if it did not exist, everything would happen at the same time.  That friction is required for anything to exist at all and also for things like decentralization to exist.  Reducing friction to zero is not actually a beneficial trait, especialy when doing so requires you to change from sound money to unsound money.  It's a pro-hyper globalization argument when globalization just leads to collapse.  

It's like Joseph Tainter says, "collapse is rapid simplification on a mass scale".  Such a thing can only happen if all systems are interconnected under globalization.  It's necessary to buffer systems off from one another induced by friction to avoid said outcome.



1205. Post 20079478 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: empowering on July 12, 2017, 01:22:37 AM
It's not a valid argument.  It's like complaing about the speed of light existing, while if it did not exist, everything would happen at the same time.  That friction is required for anything to exist at all and also for things like decentralization to exist.  Reducing friction to zero is not actually a beneficial trait, especialy when doing so requires you to change from sound money to unsound money.

Baloney




1206. Post 20079949 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):




1207. Post 20125169 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):




1208. Post 20141970 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Morale will improve until beatings continue



1209. Post 20144149 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Did someone say silver bitchez?

http://www.silverdoctors.com/gold/gold-news/shocking-ceo-of-the-cme-tells-fox-biz-gold-should-probably-be-at-5-6koz/



1210. Post 20154841 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Waffen SS leader Alex Jones' stunning prophecy from weeks ago comes to pass:




1211. Post 20155071 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on July 15, 2017, 05:13:15 PM
Waiting for a cheque to clear

It's not stopping till at least $1600's; better delay that check.  Anyway, there is no reason for bitcoin to exist ever since ASICs were created, so let this shit implode with 500 forks and then Luke Jr (or Ruke Junya as he is known in China) can change the PoW algo to GPU mining and bitcoin can have some type of reason to exist again.



1212. Post 20157068 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: SERVERIA on July 15, 2017, 07:22:49 PM
BTC




1213. Post 20157553 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on July 15, 2017, 07:48:42 PM
bitcoin now:

Is it time for the bitcoin theme song?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwL3yP260AQ




1214. Post 20158301 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: bitcrypto10101 on July 15, 2017, 09:15:05 PM
Are you dumping silver for cheaper BTC rebuy ?

What kind of fool would do that?  Silver is at cost of production or even below it for some miners.  Silver is a far better buy than BTC.  Next metals bull run will probably be gold $3000-3200, silver $90-120.  If there's some type of big economic event or lots of printing, gold $5000-ish, silver $166-$200.  If they're forced to revalue gold entirely in one act, gold will be set to $10-20k and silver will be astronomical.



1215. Post 20158449 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Dafar on July 15, 2017, 09:35:58 PM
Are you dumping silver for cheaper BTC rebuy ?

What kind of fool would do that?  Silver is at cost of production or even below it for some miners.  Silver is a far better buy than BTC.  Next metals bull run will probably be gold $3000-3200, silver $90-120.  If there's some type of big economic event or lots of printing, gold $5000-ish, silver $166-$200.  If they're forced to revalue gold entirely in one act, gold will be set to $10-20k and silver will be astronomical.

Another lunatic precious metal shill like cliff high. Hilarious stuff man, haven't learned your lesson since you bought up gold with ur BTC huh

Cliff High is more of a lunatic btc shill than metals shill, or just a lunatic in general.  He was telling everyone to buy cloakcoin for fucks sake.



1216. Post 20158659 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: FractalUniverse on July 15, 2017, 09:45:53 PM
and now imagine the price of bitcoin, if such  inflationary assets like metals reach $5-10k

I can tell you exactly what will happen.  First of all, the crypto market cap is currently higher than that of silver, so cryptocurrency is not some small cap item that will rise faster than anything else.
Secondly, people who have worked their entire lives to save up and then see the system melting down and their money vaporizing before their eyes are only going to be interested in the safest bet possible, and that is not cryptocurrency.  In event of crap hitting the fan, 90%+ of money taking flight is going to things like metals and then some money into other tangibles like property, cars, etc, like what happened in Venezeula/soviet union.

Shit hitting the fan is not really that beneficial to bitcoin due to the Joseph Tainter quote:

"Collapse is rapid simplification on a mass scale"

Things collapsing means bitcoin will be completely unusable rather than gaining some type of value.  The only reason a handful of people in Venezeula found any type of use in it is because they used it to buy from other nations that haven't blown up yet.  If the "west" implodes, you can't do that.



1217. Post 20160428 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Panic now or wait till 1945 is breached and the flood gates open to $16xx?



1218. Post 20160629 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

For anyone who doesn't know how this game works, the second a bunch of people make some enormous life changing amount of money, that's when the whole house of cards comes collapsing down for a reset into a new bear market before next bull market begins.  People like Vitalik are up +$100 million, and traders who know absolutely nothing about cryptocurrency but bought Eth due to hype made lots of money from the R3 criminal bankers pumping it.

All of those people will now create a rush for the exits as the price collapses.  When nobody is up some enormous amount of money after an extended period of time, there's a chance for another bull run to begin.  This is the same thing that played out in the metals market with the bear run pretty much reaching it's end now.



1219. Post 20160699 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on July 16, 2017, 01:33:08 AM
Nah guys this was it. The double bottom. Enjoy your cheap coins

I remember the "cheap coins" guy back from June:


Quote from: keithers on June 27, 2017, 06:35:29 PM
This would mean cheaper coins

Quote from: keithers on June 27, 2017, 06:35:29 PM
cheaper coins

Quote from: keithers on June 27, 2017, 06:35:29 PM
cheaper coins



1220. Post 20160790 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on July 16, 2017, 01:42:12 AM
r0ach you sold your coins around $500, correct?

No, but feel free to make up more stuff.  I did sell most at $2700 then the rest at $2500 though.



1221. Post 20161714 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 16, 2017, 03:11:30 AM
Double bottom is in.

It sounds like you need to power up via Alex Jones Super Male Vitality pills in order to spot the real bottom:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCkS8RXCDUs



1222. Post 20175517 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):




1223. Post 20175708 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Micman--PLO on July 16, 2017, 08:02:12 PM
Can somebody give me A Very Good option about whats gonna happen and why with A Good and easy explanation Huh

Yea, bitcoin is currently the worst of both worlds.  People claim it's purpose is decentralization, yet if they actually cared about that, they would fork it to a new PoW to be GPU mineable.  If we're going to continue the scheme under ASIC centralization, you may as well scale while being centralized and unleash blocksize to the moon.  So as I said, we now have the worst of all worlds with all the negatives of each philosophy and no benefit of either one.

There is ZERO reason for bitcoin to exist with non-commodified ASIC mining, so my vote is give everyone the middle finger and fork PoW to GPU mining so we can pretend bitcoin has some type of reason to exist.  If anyone who has some type of credibility like being a former BTC dev attempts a PoW fork, the GPU fork will win simply because the GPU side will have far more actors, many of which are willing to mine at a loss for extended duration, while all the ASIC warehouses will shut down immediately like KNC did.



1224. Post 20176022 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Asrael999 on July 16, 2017, 08:25:43 PM
If you own coins in a wallet to which you own the private keys then after any chain split you will own coins on both chains

We are going to Barry Silbert the fuck out of the GPU chain and just mine at a loss until all ASIC companies are bankrupt because aggregate GPU miners can outlast them with ease.



1225. Post 20176333 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: bitserve on July 16, 2017, 08:47:40 PM
By the end of August we shall have new ATH.


If you've been buying since June that's a totally understandable position. I think maybe you bought this account to talk horse shit. But what do I know.

You sold?


If everyone dumps at the same time, we can all rebuy at $200 and start over again?  Quick, someone call up the Winklevoss.



1226. Post 20177016 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on July 16, 2017, 06:48:50 PM
Buy the dip is a fools errand. I'm not even sure buy the crash is wise at this point.

The "bitcoin can only go up, buy every dip!" crowd has been getting rewarded for an abnormally long amount of time, so it's inevitable a bear market rape correction sweeps in at some point to dislodge a fool and his money.



1227. Post 20177787 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on July 16, 2017, 05:16:31 PM
The panic continues

Quote from: JimboToronto on July 16, 2017, 05:16:31 PM
panic

Quote from: JimboToronto on July 16, 2017, 05:16:31 PM
panic

How can you not panic when they're putting stuff in the water to turn the frogs gay?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JRLCBb7qK8










1228. Post 20178025 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on July 16, 2017, 11:03:21 PM
starting to look like a reversal

It's starting to look like:

Quote from: MatTheCat on February 21, 2016, 10:14:28 AM
The majority who invest money in a vacuos asset like Bitcoin are certain to lose

Quote from: MatTheCat on April 27, 2016, 09:07:00 AM
So my plan is to look for long setups

Quote from: MatTheCat on January 24, 2016, 08:54:17 PM
Fucking rat cocksuckers. 6 fucking BTC trade with Stop Order



1229. Post 20179377 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: pinacolada on July 16, 2017, 09:51:40 PM
Buy the dip is a fools errand. I'm not even sure buy the crash is wise at this point.

The "bitcoin can only go up, buy every dip!" crowd has been getting rewarded for an abnormally long amount of time, so it's inevitable a bear market rape correction sweeps in at some point to dislodge a fool and his money.


Yes, it's called gamblers fallacy. Smiley

Nice, Blythe Masters is back.  When are we going to pump silver?  Is there another temporary fakeout to the $14.6 level first, or is it straight skateboard ramp moonshot from here to $3000 gold $90-120 silver?




1230. Post 20179735 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: unknown04 on July 17, 2017, 02:02:03 AM
but im positive about after 1st august, it will go back up...

All four bitcoins?



1231. Post 20181286 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: kenji on July 17, 2017, 01:34:16 AM
Bulltrap...




1232. Post 20200001 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Short covering is over, back to crash mode:




1233. Post 20200365 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Torque on July 17, 2017, 11:37:25 PM
Ya'll must like them bull traps.

In something like gold and silver you can at least say "ok, the price is only a tiny bit over cost of production so it's not gonna go lower".  In bitcoin, cost of production is recursive based on it's own demand, so there's never any real price floor ever and the thing is always just going to be a pump and dump game to see who can jigger the price up then bail out, or attack the non-existent cost of production floor with shorts to create a new lower synthetic floor to cover as miners are forced to shut down.  

The economics of bitcoin are honestly cringe worthy when you hear people claim this is some type of form of "sound money".  This is like an extended replica of the Jewish Ponzi system that already exists where nobody can figure out what the real value of anything is and everything is entirely based around nothing but manipulation.



1234. Post 20202174 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on July 18, 2017, 02:46:20 AM
I don't expect the price to recover so quickly, but those are the breaks.

Not when the financial news section about bitcoin currently reads:

This grotesque bubble is blowing apart right now



1235. Post 20233600 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Bitcoin is a scammy enough pump and dump, but how is the scam below even worth $1 still, let alone hundreds of dollars?




1236. Post 20245661 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):




1237. Post 20261831 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: lightfoot on July 20, 2017, 03:16:59 PM
So I see BIP passed. Interesting, miners kept screwing with it till the wire.

It's called a pump and dump scam.  They painted a cup and handle that shouldn't exist then screwed with BIP signaling turning it off and on (like bitfury) to try and rig the market then turn it back on and pump trying to attract greater fools to chase their pump.  The only reason to dabble in the bitcoin market at all is to try and extract money from it to turn into physical gold or silver.  It's a completely centralized pump and dump scam at this point.  Not supporting a PoW change is completely idiotic when the centralized mining cartel does stuff like this right in front of your eyes in BOTH LTC + BTC segwit activation.



1238. Post 20263130 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: megashira1 on July 20, 2017, 04:16:04 PM
Miners wanted to make it look as if Segwit may not get locked in this period as to accumulate some remaining cheap coins then come back last minute and save the day. This way they are able to obtain cheap coins as well as garner the trust of the community when we face further impasses such as the 2mb HF.

Well done.

So now you're applauding that bitcoin is completely centralized under a mining cartel who rigs the market for their own pump and dump profits?  Anyone who doesn't support changing the PoW after watching them do the exact same segwit BIP manipulation in LTC AND Bitcoin is a complete fool.  Without commodity hardware mining via something like a GPU, there is no reason for bitcoin to exist.



1239. Post 20266681 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Now you know why TPTB don't even attempt to try and stop bitcoin with people like Larry Summers even actively promoting it.  It's part of the jewish banking scheme to de-cash society and bring in the cashless slave system:


http://www.silverdoctors.com/headlines/finance-news/cashless-society-alert-visa-will-be-giving-up-to-500000-to-restaurants-that-go-100-cashless/






1240. Post 20268097 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on July 20, 2017, 08:54:17 PM
Will r0ach continue his bitcoin bashing all the way up to the next couple of all-time highs? How one can be wrong so many times...

Wrong about what?  I didn't say anything about it going up or down.  I said:

Quote from: r0ach on July 05, 2017, 09:29:42 PM
bitcoin has solved zero problems whatsoever concerning money.  It doesn't solve byzantine generals, it has no Nash equilibrium, it's full of counter party risk, it's designed to centralize, doesn't scale, not fungible, not a store of value, etc.  Hence it's zero competition to gold and silver in current state.  Bitcoin in current form is literally trash compared to gold and silver.  

It's a linked list with a get rich quick scheme built on top of it, nothing more, nothing less.  Everything about it is completely arbitrary in nature.  It does not isolate any type of problem and solve it in an objective manner. It's a Rube Goldberg machine.



1241. Post 20269029 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Did anyone see this latest crypto scam?  Right as BIP91 looks ready to pass, Bologniex freezes Litecoin market out of the blue then immediately dumps it upon un-freeze (because BTC with segwit is probably bad for LTC). Looks like the type of shit you would see with people trading on their own exchange:




1242. Post 20269365 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on July 20, 2017, 10:20:43 PM
Did anyone see this latest crypto scam?  Right as BIP91 looks ready to pass, Bologniex freezes Litecoin market out of the blue then immediately dumps it upon un-freeze (because BTC with segwit is probably bad for LTC). Looks like the type of shit you would see with people trading on their own exchange:



Now after this statement (in bold)you are going on permanent ignore. Before I just thought you were a shill for the gold industry, now I know you have no idea what you are talking about.

What a dumb statement.  The LTC market dumped, backing up exactly what I said.  It's you in the wrong obviously.  Unless you want to try and pull the phony argument that the market trades in LTC/USD pair, but any actual trader knows alts trade against BTC pairing.  Alt charts make absolutely zero sense using USD pairings.  Alts are derivatives of BTC, not USD.



1243. Post 20269597 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Dakustaking76 on July 20, 2017, 10:42:31 PM
Were gonne fall back to lower levels like rOach said And kwuckfuck.

Who the hell are these fly by night "bitcoin can only go up!" noob posters?  I said bitcoin is a pump and dump that's inferior to gold and silver.  Typically pump and dumps need to go up in order to have someone to dump on, so jump in little lemming and buy some of your pump and dump shares.  Just make sure to get rid of them if the china cartel notices nobody is chasing their pump and dumps on you.



1244. Post 20270143 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: sirazimuth on July 20, 2017, 10:57:44 PM
Only because he can sound somewhat eloquent at times , I foolishly listened  and heeded advice
of that jew hating pm buffoon once a few months back,
and it cost me dearly... never again.
Now probably  like most other intelligent WO members here, i just laugh at his nonsensical posts.

Lol, what a load of shit.  BTC and Eth are both cults where if you say something like "yea guys, I don't believe this shady centralized scamtoken will become the world reserve currency", then all kinds of lunatics start screeching at you like "LIAR! ETH will be the world computer and BTC will be the world reserve currency! You are a bad person because you're not hyping the pump and dump!"



1245. Post 20270382 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

I'd like to thank everyone for coming out and contributing to this year's enrich Jihan Wu pump and dump.  Please stop by and attend next year's "let's get this money transported from the Guang Dong province to Vancouver" pump.



1246. Post 20270976 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 21, 2017, 12:13:03 AM
Locked!!!!

Now what?

Now you get to discover there is no decentralized lightning network.



1247. Post 20271635 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Torque on July 21, 2017, 12:57:55 AM
Buy on rumor, sell on news. I just bought a little bit of gold with some satoshi. Not much, but I was bored looking at the silver bullion coins that I bought a few weeks ago. Now with my bullion holdings, I'll be able to buy a month worth of cigarettes if financial collapse happens. Cheesy

You should also get some 90% junk silver coins if you don't already have some. In a worst case SHTF scenario, would be great for barter.

I don't likem.  Eagles if the premium is low ($2-$2.25), maples if they're not, and 10 oz sunshine mint bars.  Anything less would be uncivilized.




1248. Post 20272978 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Breaking crapcoin news:

http://www.dailystormer.com/no-hard-fork-for-ethercucks/



1249. Post 20289247 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: r0ach
LET'S REMIND THE SHIT COINS WHO THE REAL KING IS!!!





1250. Post 20294485 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

In simple terms, why you should hope cryptocurrency dies and gold and silver defeats them:

All cryptocurrencies are inherently rent seeking usury systems and a pseudo form of debt based currency if you will. The PoW chain does not just magically stay up on it's own, it requires a constant upkeep to exist at all (rent). A peer to peer physical gold or silver transaction can be done with no overhead cost; they're the equivalent of an off-chain transaction with no middleman or monopoly man gouging you with usury fees.  

Cryptocurrency is completely different.  Even if you attempt to do off-chain transactions via something like lightning network, or even in-person transactions with physical bitcoin bearer bonds, the transactions ALWAYS have to be settled on-chain eventually, so you are NEVER escaping the rent seeking usury system.  Since the blockchain is highly scaling constrained, it's like condeming yourself to extreme usury in the end game.  Bitcoin PoW is designed to centralize and the cartels running the mining operations will either be taken over by TPTB who already run the current system, or will just be a recreation of them in practice.

The further you abstract money away from barter, the larger a scam it is.  Only physical commodity based currencies are sound money that remove middlemen while allowing you to escape the debt based, rent seeking usury system.




1251. Post 20294754 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on July 22, 2017, 03:13:29 AM
snip

You lost on your journey to ZH?
There is so much fallacy to his argument, not sure where to begin. Try exchanging gold for anything without some usery fee.

There is no fee.  You're talking about an arb fee for exchanging between a debt based currency system where the USD is unit of account to a different system.  If metals are the unit of account, there is no arb fee and no debt based currency or usury fees either.  If you transfer into bitcoin, you're back into a debt based usury system once again.  Bitcoin does NOT remove the middleman, only physical commodity based currencies like metals do.



1252. Post 20295167 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Torque on July 22, 2017, 03:53:26 AM
Bitcoin does NOT remove the middleman, only physical commodity based currencies like metals do.

r0ach, you're kinda insulting everyone's intelligence here. You know darn well that you cannot transact among hundreds of thousands, millions of employees, employers, goods producers, suppliers, service providers, merchants, shippers, corporations, nations, etc. without a middleman or middle-service. At the speed/throughput needed for the world's current daily transactions (50-100k/second), peer-to-peer / face-to-face metals transactions would be impossible and unworkable.

Metals are great for wealth preservation and face-to-face snail barter, and some industry usage, but nothing more.

I will use the same argument bitcoin core uses about block size.  You can create a centralized system on top of a decentralized one, but not vice versa.  Using physical metals as the base unit of account and settlement (Exter's Pyramid) allows you to remove all middlemen and if you would like some other type of convenience, you can then build a centralized system on top of it.  Using bitcoin as the base of unit of account or settlement gives you middlemen right out of the gate already, so it's completely useless as a form of settlement.



1253. Post 20295314 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Torque on July 22, 2017, 04:05:16 AM
Using physical metals as the base unit of account and settlement (Exter's Pyramid) allows you to remove all middlemen and if you would like some other type of convenience, you can then build a centralized system on top of it.

So how would build a centralized system on top of metal without an enormous amount of counter-party risk? How would you guarantee who held what? Goldmoney.com is currently already doing it, but you have to fully trust that they secure your metal and will deliver it in full on demand. HUGE counter-party risk.

There is no difference whatsoever in practice between metals and bitcoin in that case.  For instance, for bitcoin to have any market penetration in the upper middle class of the world, you would need around 8 MB blocks, then on-chain transactions would still only be economical for something like transactions of $10k in value.  This means you would have, say $100k in savings and transfer $10k at a time onto a centralized BTC debit card or something.  With metals you would do the exact same thing, move small amounts at a time onto a more centralized system if you need the convenience.  

Do you see now why bitcoin doesn't actually solve any problem whatsoever? lol. It just makes the base settlement layer of your system less sound than precious metals and introduces middlemen where middlemen shouldn't exist. This is why legacy banking shills like Larry Summers and Ben Bernanke support bitcoin, because it allows them to insert themselves as middlemen where you should be immune to them.



1254. Post 20295446 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Torque on July 22, 2017, 04:14:59 AM
This means you would have, say $100k in savings and transfer $10k at a time onto a centralized BTC debit card or something.  With metals, you would do the exact same thing, move small amounts at a time onto a more centralized system if you need the convenience.  

You could not do this and have this system exist without fees to transact. Not possible.

The point is you are not REQUIRED to expose yourself to any 3rd party middlemen using metals as a settlement layer like in bitcoin (the miners who demand rent).  The energy input >0 required at all times for bitcoin to exist at all makes it a debt based system in practice.  Metals are not a rent seeking vortex, they exist with no energy input; they're not a debt based system.  You cannot use a debt based system as the base settlement layer.  It's completely absurd to even suggest it.



1255. Post 20295906 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: bones261 on July 22, 2017, 04:44:22 AM
I suppose they could make a machine that checks out the coins/bullion for you. However, I am sure the makers of such machines will charge a pretty penny for said machine or tack on a small "fee" to rent for the use.

They already exist.  You can also use free android phone apps and a ping test where the microphone can spot fake coins by resonance of the ping.  Hell, I can tell the difference between real or fake with my ear with ease.
There are also things like the specific gravity test.  It actually seems far easier to spot fake silver than fake gold because tungsten is EXTREMELY close to gold in the specific gravity test, while nothing to my knowledge is for silver, plus silver has several other unique traits gold doesn't.

Quote from: PoolMinor on July 22, 2017, 04:53:02 AM
See again with the fallacy...."they(metals) exist with no energy input" yes they exist on Earth but in order to retrieve them it costs (guess what?) MONEY!!ENERGY!!!CALORIES!!!

They are not debt based instruments because they require no rent or energy input greater >0 to exist at all while bitcoin is a debt based instrument.



1256. Post 20295937 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 22, 2017, 05:07:09 AM
Hey gang. I have no life and have run out of things to do in my mom's basement.

Does anyone know of a good gold speculation forum I can go to and talk about bitcoin all day? The only reason I would do it is that I have no life. I have no interest at all in gold but I think they would appreciate me talking about bitcoin in a place where they go to discuss gold.

Any help would be appreciated.

http://www.zerohedge.com/

The Winklevoss are still mad at the jews and Larry Summers after facebook.  We could convince them to dump and destroy bitcoin while using the money to buy silver at the same time.  This would implode the bitcoin debt based usury system Larry Summers is trying to hoist on people, while also imploding banker's metals manipulation and sending silver to $100+ at the same time.  Profit while destroying your enemies in the process.  Win win.



1257. Post 20296097 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on July 22, 2017, 05:19:13 AM
btw his debt-base doodoo is just some made up shit FUD

Nice lying Marcus, but you know it's 100% true and not so called "FUD".  Bitcoin is a rent seeking usury system that introduces middlemen where middlemen should not exist.

I will repeat my statement again since you don't seem to understand why bitcoin is invalid as a settlement layer:

Quote from: r0ach on July 22, 2017, 04:24:49 AM
The point is you are not REQUIRED to expose yourself to any 3rd party middlemen using metals as a settlement layer like in bitcoin (the miners who demand rent).  The energy input >0 required at all times for bitcoin to exist at all makes it a debt based system in practice. Metals are not a rent seeking vortex, they exist with no energy input; they're not a debt based system.  You cannot use a debt based system as the base settlement layer.  It's completely absurd to even suggest it.



1258. Post 20296276 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: orpington on July 22, 2017, 05:35:00 AM
Average joes are stupid, they don't have an opinion. And you can certainly bet that they won't suddenly start buying bitcoins when the halving comes.

The only purpose of Bitcoin is a hedge against legacy financial systems imploding.  If they were stable and functioned, there would be no reason to switch.  Since the legacy financial systems are mathematically doomed, a good bit of transfer of wealth is likely to move to Bitcoin.  You're basically front running the transfer before the average Joe is forced to change, like in Venezuela how they became super interested in Bitcoin as their currency implodes.

You quoted the "dump the dollar and buy anything but the dollar" trade.  Both the dollar and bitcoin are rent seeking usury schemes, but the dollar is loaned into existence so it requires infinite growth to not collapse for servicing the interest when combined interest is always higher than the principal.  

Since demographics have peaked in every nation that matters, and energy return on investment is also cratering, growth is over and the dollar is mathematically doomed unless interest rates are perma set to 0 or negative. Bitcoin doesn't require infinite growth to exist, all it requires is some greater fools, so it can outlive the dollar, but it's still a rent seeking usury scheme with built in middlemen while metals are not.



1259. Post 20296624 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on July 22, 2017, 05:57:55 AM
Actually they probably just want to sell them for a higher price.

Maybe you will get to sell a bitcoin or two at a higher price.  Maybe not.  Eventually the ghost of Ron Paul will come calling to haunt you daring to participate in unsound money:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-8kmPJKGgM




1260. Post 20308091 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: edgar on July 22, 2017, 07:19:03 AM
gold & silver are cumbersome at best, and subject to outright confiscation at worst.

Most illogical statement I've ever seen.  Nobody actually "owns" bitcoins.  If you have the private key, the so called "coins" don't actually leave the blockchain into your possession.  The blockchain is like a virtual loaf of bread you make believe you own a piece of, but since you never actually take possession of anything, it's always loaded to the hilt with counter party risk and built-in middle men you can't rid yourself of.  Metals remove counter party risk and middle men, bitcoin doesn't remove either one.  These attributes make bitcoin useless as a settlement layer.



1261. Post 20309096 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Torque on July 22, 2017, 06:26:15 PM
Metals remove counter party risk and middle men
Only when it is sitting still, like deep in the ground. Or in your closet. Otherwise, no it doesn't.

More made up bullshit.  You're not required to ever place metals into 3rd party custody.  It's not possible to "take possesision" of bitcoin because the coins never leave the blockchain in the first place.  You are always exposed to rent seeking middlemen (transaction validators) and counter party risk in bitcoin.  This is why bitcoin is 100% useless as a settlement layer. Maybe you can use craptocurrency as a Paypal-style payment processor, aka a currency, but it's useless as a settlement layer aka money (the base of Exter's pyramid).

Here's an 1800 year old silver Roman denarius.  Where will bitcoin be in 1800 years?  It will be dead as a doornail long before then.  It's useless as a settlemenet layer and unable to do  things like reliably transfer generational wealth:




1262. Post 20309482 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Torque on July 22, 2017, 06:48:00 PM
Any time a large amount of metals move for payment and an entity takes possession of said metals, transaction fees in the form of security, transportation, and storage are required.

Completely irrelevant and orthogonal argument.  For all you crackhead bitcoiners who are trying to buy kilos of whatever substance you are smoking, anytime you are transferring large amounts of fiat paper, metals, or bitcoin and receiving real world goods for them, you would need security on both sides to make sure the other side doesn't try to stiff them.  So called Buttalik Butterin dumb contracts don't alleviate this problem if you're transacting in real world goods.



1263. Post 20310064 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Dafar on July 22, 2017, 06:57:03 PM
Gold + Silver = Dumb money

Bitcoin = Smart money

Bitcoin isn't money at all, it's a currency.  Fungibility is one of the requirements of money.  Money can't just randomly morph from one thing to another with forks or alterations.

Money = has objective, static traits

Currency = random arbitrary bullshit some guy makes up and constantly fiddles with aka bitcoin

This is why it's called "cryptocurrency".  Currencies are not a store of value either.  People just make believe bitcoin is whenever they get on the profitable side of a pump and dump.



1264. Post 20311024 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Torque on July 22, 2017, 07:46:47 PM
People just make believe bitcoin is whenever they get on the profitable side of a pump and dump.

Gold pumped from $400 to $1900, now down to $1255

Silver pumped from $16 to $50, now down to $16.50

Metals a reliable store of value, you say?

Not a valid argument and I already posted why.  The ESF can only naked short metals down to cost of production to try and contain them.  The second they go after bitcoin with naked shorts, they can literally destroy it because there's no real price floor.  The fact that the ESF has not yet attempted to destroy bitcoin means one of two things:  1) either bitcoin is a govt sanctioned scam, or 2)  they just haven't gotten around to destroying it yet:

Quote from: r0ach on July 22, 2017, 01:56:10 AM
4)  Cryptocurrency doesn't function as a store of value because it's price floor is recursive based on it's own demand (in PoW). This means it's a complete house of cards in terms of so called value storage.
In commodities like silver, the ESF practices Keynesianism in the commodity markets and naked shorts them down to cost of production to try and keep their market caps as low as possible and prevent them from competing with the dollar. Why? Because nobody would submit to slavery via debt based scam currency at all unless you force them into it.

They can't short metals lower than cost of production because it would create scarcity and be counterintuitive to their goals. However, they can short bitcoin below cost of production because there is no real price floor, only a temporary, synthetic one. This in turn causes the miners to be forced to turn off (like KNC) and the synthetic floor crashes even more until the thing implodes to nothingness.

Another reason why craptocurrency is horrible and not a sound form of money. Metals like silver can be manipulated by shorts to contain their market cap, but bitcoin can actually be destroyed by them due to having no real floor.



1265. Post 20320348 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: jbreher on July 22, 2017, 08:49:07 PM
The fact that the ESF has not yet attempted to destroy bitcoin means one of two [three] things:  1) either bitcoin is a govt sanctioned scam, or 2)  they just haven't gotten around to destroying it yet:

;or
3) Nobody will accept a naked short bitcoin, as it not only is a naked short, but it is no easier to obtain, hold, and secure than a real Bitcoin. Paper gold, OTOH, is much easier to obtain, hold, and secure than real gold - which is why (some foolish) people accept it.

Due to the technical nature of bitcoin and the fact that most people don't even know how to work a VCR, it's a given the vast majority of the population will be using "bitcoin banks" like Coinbase or other entities and not taking delivery of their coins.  It will be even easier to short bitcoin into the ground than metals.  

Like I said, you don't even need naked shorts.  All you need to do is short the price below cost of production and force miners to turn off, which in turn further reduces the synthetic price floor through a feedback loop since cost of production is recursive based on it's own demand.  Anyone who doesn't acknowledge bitcoin is far more vulnerable to weaponized shorts than metals is either lying or doesn't know what they're talking about imo.

TLDR: there is no incentive whatsoever for the ESF to short metals below cost of production, but there's huge incentive for them to do so in bitcoin.

Quote from: becoin on July 23, 2017, 09:05:37 AM
the sooner big blockers get their own stupid coin the better





1266. Post 20357592 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Well, we already knew the R3 heebs were behind the Eth pump and dump scam.  Now we know who's been trying to pump and dump bitcoin lately:  Goldman Sachs trying to dump their bag of trash on you.  Maybe we should rename them to "Marcus of Sachs" and "JayJuanGoldman"?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-24/goldman-nervous-bitcoin-traders-be-patient-next-surge-will-take-it-above-3600



1267. Post 20359722 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on July 24, 2017, 11:08:15 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-24/bitcoin-options-to-become-available-in-fall-after-cftc-approval

so what does this mean for bitcoin? is it good? bad? a disaster? are we gonna be drowned in volatility and paper bitcoin?

It means a few different options:

1)  The bankers talk about how they introduce volatility into the metals market to try and scare the general public out of them, so it might just be wild pump and dump city for craptocurrency

2)  The R3 bankers own most of the Ethereum scamtokens and likely a lesser amount of bitcoin, so they might try to weaken bitcoin while pumping the Eth scam

3)  They might just naked short everything into the ground like they do in metals to try and keep people in the dollar

4)  If there's a danger of a run on the Comex from too much fractional reserve, they might try to pump craptocurrency in order to try and trick people from buying gold and silver and redirect them back into digital scam markets instead

In other words, it's generally bad from every angle for everyone on the planet to give govt the power to control markets.



1268. Post 20359912 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on July 24, 2017, 11:31:14 PM
$BTCUSD 50/200 MA Cross - First since April 7th. Fasten your seatbelts.

lol? moving averages are reverse looking, not forward looking.  At least RSI gives you an idea of if the market is overbought or oversold, but a MA like that tells you absolutely nothing besides what has already happened. Yea, it's possible it can go up.  It's also possible it can go down.  The only reason RSI works is because markets don't actually exist, just manipulation.  RSI tells you if people have any ammo left to manipulate more or not, while generic moving averages tell you nothing unless the market is entirely controlled by a bot built on using them.



1269. Post 20360138 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on July 24, 2017, 11:46:19 PM
the RSI looks good.

i expect 500$ pop really soon...

Look at the chart...it's two vertical lines going straight up resembling any typical pump and dump.  Either they will be satisfied with their profits here and dump them on you, or they will do a calculated risk of being greedy and try to extract more pump and dump profits going higher.  This is no aggregate market.  Which way the mostly single entity controlling the market goes will also be determined by if there's shorts to squeeze or not.  Usually the bitcoin market only goes up if there's lots of shorts to squeeze.



1270. Post 20360211 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: d_eddie on July 24, 2017, 11:52:28 PM
Delete #3 to begin with. No naked shorts.
Quote
The CFTC said in a statement Monday LedgerX will be authorized to provide clearing services for fully-collateralized digital currency swaps.
(My emphasis.)

Yea right, the monetary system has been run as a scam for hundreds of years and they are just now going to stop scamming people for no reason?  Doesn't matter anyway, you can destroy bitcoin without naked shorts just by continuously shorting it below cost of production, which forces miners to turn off and lowers the synthetic price floor further.



1271. Post 20361544 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: savetherainforest on July 25, 2017, 01:41:09 AM
Nothing lasts forever. Not even Bitcoin.

We can only hope it doesn't last much longer since it's main purpose is simply going to be escalation in the "de-cashing" of society and integration of you into this:

https://steemit.com/news/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-19-the-mainstream-media-broke-all-records-in-malthusian-propaganda-today-rfid-chipping



1272. Post 20361852 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on July 25, 2017, 02:05:05 AM
i see r0ach

Adam, you need to stop shilling.  99% of this board is so clueless about economics and money it's absurd.  Here's the Syscoin dev earlier trying to pretend it's even possible for bitcoin to be fungible and why I have to explain to him why it's not, and hence not possible to be money either:

Quote from: r0ach on July 25, 2017, 02:06:05 AM
CT and schnorr sigs will make btc fungible.

Cryptocurrency is NOT fungible.  You're trying to make believe that if coins can be tumbled it's somehow fungible but there is more to it than that.  If anything about the protocol at all can be altered via a strongman or banana republic voting to take over it's exposed power vacuum it's not fungible.  Anonymint even agreed on this at one point in time but he has probably cucked out and did a 180 now that he wants to release a cryptocurrency of his own.

Money = has objective, static traits

Currency = random arbitrary bullshit some guy makes up and constantly fiddles with like fiat or bitcoin. If it's possible for your money to "hard fork", or randomly morph from one thing to another, it's not fungible, and hence not money. In that circumstance you are involved in some type of scheme with a schemer ruling over you.

It doesn't matter if said forks are orchestrated by a banana republic of miners in a voting process. There is no Nash equilibrium in cryptocurrency, only a power vacuum to be filled by a top down hierarchy or strongman. To escape this master and servant hierarchy you have to use real money that cannot be altered or tampered with by third parties.



1273. Post 20362126 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on July 25, 2017, 02:31:17 AM
out of all the forums on the internet, you choose this one to shill for your beloved gold.

.... smart move buddy, well played.

There is no shilling required, only objective facts:

Quote from: r0ach on July 25, 2017, 02:38:40 AM
Cryptocurrency is not fungible by definition because it can be changed via power vacuum, while gold and silver are fungible because elements on the periodic table are immune to things like democracy or authoritarianism.



1274. Post 20362469 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on July 25, 2017, 02:48:34 AM
Cryptocurrency is not fungible by definition because it can be changed via power vacuum, while gold and silver are fungible because elements on the periodic table are immune to things like democracy or authoritarianism.

you dont have to work to hard, when your argument is right eh.

well markets will stay irrational longer then you can stay solvent.
will you cry when bitcoin breaks above 4000$

I'm entirely aware bitcoin can be pump and dumped to a larger number (or maybe it dies first) while having no fundamentals whatsoever in comparison to gold and silver as "money", and it's fundamentals as even a "currency" instead of money are also bad because you would have to get rid of the blockchain entirely in order to scale and convert to some emunie-like system with no state recovery at all, hence being even more unsound and fragile as a monetary instrument.

All I really care about is picking the asymmetric trade in the long run, and since bitcoin's fundamentals are poor as both money and currency, this definitely disqualifies it in the asymmetric trade aspect.  People here like to pretend it's inevitable bitcoin goes to some absurd number like John McAfee, and what I'm saying is, no, there are no fundamentals backing that viewpoint at all.  The only place I can find fundamentals like that are in gold and silver (mostly silver).



1275. Post 20362906 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: jbreher on July 25, 2017, 03:24:41 AM
The security tradeoffs (segwit/lightning network) are not worth it to me. And as mentioned before, there's that entire lack of a working routing mechanism thing.

The fact there's been somewhat of a conspiracy to pretend lightning network can function in a decentralized manner will put bitcoin in it's grave once people figure out it's not possible.  You would need to put all transactions in the same common que to prevent attacks and other problems, then you're right back to square one of on-chain bitcoin scaling.  But the fundamentals of on-chain scaling are also bad.  

You would need around 8 MB blocks for bitcoin to have market penetration into the upper middle class of the world, and even with blocks that big, only enormous transactions of something like $5-10k would be economical on-chain. People would hold, say $100k in savings in an address they control and transfer $10k at a time onto a 3rd party bitcoin debit card.

The problem with this solution is that bitcoin would be functioning solely as a settlement layer and it cannot compete with gold and silver as one.  People would be far better served transferring $10k worth of metals at a time onto a 3rd party debit card instead.  Metals are far superior as a store of value and bitcoin also has built in middle men (transaction validators) and doesn't remove counter party risk.  Bitcoin's fundamentals as a settlement layer are essentially zero due to better options that already exist.



1276. Post 20363983 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on July 25, 2017, 04:48:37 AM
millions of coins will be dumped all at once.
they all believe BCC is worthless
they all believe everyone will sell BCC ASAP
they will sell BCC in a hurry no matter how low or how far price has already tanked
and we know they are coming soooo...
price will crash really really hard, like nothing you've ever seen.




1277. Post 20365603 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Dakustaking76 on July 25, 2017, 06:53:24 AM
Price is going lower again
What happend?

Because the sheklers at Goldman Sachs told people to buy bitcoin with both hands, which means it's probably going to 12 cents:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-24/goldman-nervous-bitcoin-traders-be-patient-next-surge-will-take-it-above-3600



1278. Post 20366924 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: fluidjax on July 25, 2017, 07:23:28 AM
but it's about ensuring the network is de-centralised.  

I've seen all kinds of stupid explanations on these forums for what constitutes "decentralized".  The current bitcoin core explanation is basically "the ability to run a node".  Lol?  Then you got Adam and the 400 MB block gang who didn't even bother to come up with some type of poorly constructed defintion.  In reality, it's the ability for people to mine the coins directly which requires commodity off the shelf mining hardware - meaning the network is currently completely centralized.  Therefore, anyone who actually cares about decentralization would be campaigning for a PoW change to GPU, otherwise there's no reason for bitcoin to exist.



1279. Post 20367567 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: fluidjax on July 25, 2017, 08:36:33 AM
but it's about ensuring the network is de-centralised.  

I've seen all kinds of stupid explanations on these forums for what constitutes "decentralized".  The current bitcoin core explanation is basically "the ability to run a node".  Lol?  Then you got Adam and the 400 MB block gang who didn't even bother to come up with some type of poorly constructed defintion.  In reality, it's the ability for people to mine the coins directly which requires commodity off the shelf mining hardware - meaning the network is currently completely centralized.  Therefore, anyone who actually cares about decentralization would be campaigning for a PoW change to GPU, otherwise there's no reason for bitcoin to exist.

If everyone mined that would help de-centralise the network, however there is no PoW change that fixes the current one's problems.
GPU's, different algorithms, they all simply kick the centralisation problems a few months down the road. We need something new, but until that comes we are stuck with what we've got.

There's no reason for any common man off the street to support bitcoin unless he can mine it himself.  Supporting bitcoin at this juncture simply means helping Jihan Wu and a handful of other monopolies become richer.  Bitcoin would likely have already died if it wasn't for altcoins that could be mined then converted to BTC, otherwise the ecosystem would be entirely walled off.



1280. Post 20368246 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on July 25, 2017, 09:11:36 AM
Price is going lower again
What happend?
Small drop i know But just asking Why aint we going forward

... looks like the hard-fork-now fail army are back out on the intertubes doing the FUDster rounds again.

Everytime they show up with latest hard-fork-now FUD price dumps. They probably don't realise they are tools (useful idiots) of the bankster players.

As opposed to the other useful idiots who hype blockchains where every transaction is traced and monitored - the ultimate Orwellian police state dream - while also helping in the banker's goal to eradicate cash from society so they can then control the remaining digital infrastructure and turn everyone into a slave instead of people just using gold and silver to defeat them?  Did you mean those other useful idiots?



1281. Post 20369025 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on July 25, 2017, 09:55:32 AM
As opposed to the other useful idiots who hype blockchains where every transaction is traced and monitored - the ultimate Orwellian police state dream - while also helping in the banker's goal to eradicate cash from society so they can then control the remaining digital infrastructure and turn everyone into a slave instead of people just using gold and silver to defeat them?  Did you mean those other useful idiots?

Have no idea what you're babbling about brother ... bitcoin's a level playing field

A level playing field if you first purchase an ASIC from Jihan Wu, which allows Jihan Wu to build 10 ASIC of his own for each ASIC you buy from him?  This is fake news.




1282. Post 20370965 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: YamashitaRen on July 25, 2017, 11:12:56 AM
Bad day to try new trading strategy  Undecided

I'm just there looking at my 2653 long order, have absolutely no idea what to do with it °°

After margin call, take the remaining 40% and convert to physical silver immediately then wait for $10,000 gold revaluation and 15:1 silver peg ($600).  The world's 2nd most criminal bank JP Morgan is acting as an agent of the US govt to naked short the paper market while taking delivery of physical.



1283. Post 20371321 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 25, 2017, 11:50:12 AM
BCC stands for Blind Carbon Copy.

They are creating a carbon copy of bitcoin that nobody else can see or use.

Satoshi Nakamoto won't like this




1284. Post 20386063 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: chesthing on July 26, 2017, 12:24:26 AM
the trend is pretty clear ... whenever killerpotleaf (adam) and jbreher (bear) show up here to spread more HARD-FORK-NOW! FUD and stir up the natives then price is going to drop.

pretty sure they are both on WuVer's payroll ... he throws them a few bitcoins to spread FUD whenever they get the word.

If the market is so fragile that a few fudders can make the price go down, it's probably going to come down on it's own eventually. Donchathink?

It was doomed to collapse the second Goldman Sachs published an article saying "buy bitcoin with both hands goyim!"



1285. Post 20386906 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Paashaas on July 25, 2017, 12:41:10 PM
Do not go longterm gold ROach (10-20 years), when the age of space mining starts gold and some other precious metals will be worthless.

If you're going to try and argue with me about metals, please have at least some primitive understanding of how the market works.

For people clueless about metals vs bitcoin:

The ESF naked shorts metals down capping them to like 5-10% above cost of production in order to try and contain them.  The vast majority of their cost of production is based on the oil price, so metals in this rigged market are almost like oil futures in practice.  Over the last 100 years we were arbing excess and cheap (basically free) energy into the extraction of these metals pulling out enormous amounts of them, far more than were mined in the Roman days.

The time has now come where we've used up most the low hanging fruit in energy and EROI is collapsing (energy return on investment) so this arb game is ending.  At the same time where EROI is collapsing, we are also reaching peak gold and peak silver at the same time.  For instance, you need to move something like twice as much earth on average in the year 2017 as in the year 2000 in order to get 1 oz of silver (not to mention they printed an enormous amount of money at the same time).

The holy trinity that will catapult metals to the moon is the combination of collapsing EROI, crashing metals content per ton of earth mined, and probable revaluation of metals by the CBs in the near future (gold to $10k+ and silver even higher percentage gains).  Cost of production to mine anything in space will be astronomical so you're wasting my time even mentioning it.  You might as well claim we will mine gold inside a black hole or alternate dimension. We would probably attempt to mine metals 2 miles under the ocean long before space but that is of course no threat to anyone buying at current prices.

The fourth piece of the puzzle is that debt based usury currencies require infinite growth to not collapse since the interest due is always higher than the principal.  Demographics have peaked in every nation that matters (the horn of Africa does not matter), and net energy production is flatlined with the cost of  that production rapidly rising due to collapsing EROI.  Since every action in an economy requires someone either doing something by hand or a machine doing it for them and burning fuel in the process, this means growth is over and all debt based currencies are 100% doomed to collapse.

Since the debt based currencies are doomed to collapse, they will be forced to either issue a non-debt based paper currency issued by the treasury like the greenback, or go back to a metals standard.  Either route will see the USD and all other fiats collapse in the process with metals skyrocketing, so metals win regardless.  There has likely never in all of human history been a more bullish time for metals (silver in particular) than this point right now.  

Bitcoin doesn't have good fundamentals to compete with gold and silver as a settlement layer (aka money or the base of Exter's pyramid) because it has built in rent seeking middlemen (transaction validators) and doesn't remove counter party risk.  It also doesn't have good fundamentals as a currency due to horrible scalability from a high redundancy, triple entry accounting design, so it's currently designed to fail at both tasks.  Someone would need to bring it back to the drawing board and completely redesign it as a high throughput currency and forget it ever competing with metals as a settlement layer to have some type of relevency.

Cryptocurrency is not fungible no matter what you do to it, and thus not possible to be money, only currency like dollars or airline miles:

Quote from: r0ach on July 25, 2017, 02:22:59 AM
Cryptocurrency is NOT fungible.  If anything about the protocol at all can be altered via a strongman or banana republic voting to take over it's exposed power vacuum it's not fungible.

Money = has objective, static traits

Currency = random arbitrary bullshit some guy makes up and constantly fiddles with like fiat or bitcoin. If it's possible for your money to "hard fork", or randomly morph from one thing to another, it's not fungible, and hence not money.

It doesn't matter if said forks are orchestrated by a banana republic of miners in a voting process. There is no Nash equilibrium in cryptocurrency, only a power vacuum to be filled by a top down hierarchy or strongman. To escape this master and servant hierarchy you have to use real money that cannot be altered or tampered with by third parties.



1286. Post 20387212 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: bitserve on July 26, 2017, 02:19:19 AM
which sites do you recommend to buy gold and silver with Bitcoin

http://silvergoldbull.com currently has the best deals if buying less than $10k at a time while http://www.jmbullion.com/ is same price with faster shipping if buyign $10k or more.  Both take bitcoin.

Quote from: bitserve on July 26, 2017, 02:19:19 AM
Also if it is better to buy bars vs coins, etc etc...

In terms of premiums and buy vs resale price, Canadian silver maple leafs are currently the best deal right now at this point in time because silver eagle premiums are up (demand spiked I guess).  Sunshine mint 10 oz bars and American silver eagles are currently the next best thing in terms of price vs resale liquidity.





1287. Post 20387543 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 26, 2017, 02:40:34 AM
Best value is to buy the tungsten directly in bars and cover it in gold yourself.

Though tungsten prices are rising due to demand for "gold bars".

Gold and tungsten are EXTREMELY similar in things like the specific gravity test, which is one reason it seems a lot harder to fake silver than gold to me.  Things like the ping test seem to be more effective for silver as well, along with stuff like the magnet slide test and others.  Having said that, fake gold would still not pass the trained eye in the specific gravity test, nor the machines the bullion dealers run them through.  For the average man on the street though, it's really not hard to spot fake silver if you know what to look for, so fake metals are really not a problem at least in the silver market because it has a lot of unique traits to identify it.



1288. Post 20389007 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

There is truly no hope for people involved in bitcoin.

from:
http://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-20-everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-precious-metals-vs-bitcoin-fundamentals-and-the-future-of-the




1289. Post 20393002 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: pumpmydump on July 26, 2017, 07:07:44 AM
Cost of production to mine anything in space will be astronomical so you're wasting my time even mentioning it.  You might as well claim we will mine gold inside a black hole or alternate dimension. We would probably attempt to mine metals 2 miles under the ocean long before space but that is of course no threat to anyone buying at current prices.
http://www.planetaryresources.com/
http://deepspaceindustries.com/

Cost to start mining will be astronomical but so will be the quantities mined. Asteroid mining is not that far away in time. Privatization of space industry is bringing down costs. You don't really know whether the costs will be so high that the market won't be flooded enough to keep the price of precious metals down.

Lol, this is complete bullshit and those companies are basically Buttalik Butterin IPO scams.  It's such bullshit they can't even create a valid infographic of what said mining would look like.  Does this look like something you're going to see anytime soon or even a valid way to mine in the first place? LOL.  Let me guess, the structure on the left is a Dyson sphere they're trying to maneuver around the sun to start up the miner (which probably also mines bitcoin at the same time):






1290. Post 20395460 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: pumpmydump on July 26, 2017, 10:20:57 AM
Cost of production to mine anything in space will be astronomical so you're wasting my time even mentioning it.  You might as well claim we will mine gold inside a black hole or alternate dimension. We would probably attempt to mine metals 2 miles under the ocean long before space but that is of course no threat to anyone buying at current prices.
http://www.planetaryresources.com/
http://deepspaceindustries.com/

Cost to start mining will be astronomical but so will be the quantities mined. Asteroid mining is not that far away in time. Privatization of space industry is bringing down costs. You don't really know whether the costs will be so high that the market won't be flooded enough to keep the price of precious metals down.

Lol, this is complete bullshit and those companies are basically Buttalik Butterin IPO scams.  It's such bullshit they can't even create a valid infographic of what said mining would look like.  Does this look like something you're going to see anytime soon or even a valid way to mine in the first place? LOL.  Let me guess, the structure on the left is a Dyson sphere they're trying to maneuver around the sun to start up the miner (which probably also mines bitcoin at the same time):




That's a futuristic concept art, you don't need that kind of structure to start mining an asteroid, and it's not a Dyson sphere. You don't have to maneuver kilometer long asteroids, small ones will do, there are ones passing close by Earth, you don't have to go to the other side of the Sun or something.

It will probably be a couple decades but you shouldn't be so dismissive of it, especially if you're betting all on precious metals

Yes, yes, right after we are all culturally enriched by forced rapefugee bombardment taking the average IQ down from 100 to 75, this will grant us the power of interstellar travel and space mining:

http://whitegenocideproject.com/governor-tells-minnesotans-to-find-another-state-if-they-dont-like-african-immigration/



1291. Post 20409335 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: K~Ehleyr on July 26, 2017, 08:44:29 PM
Dash is fungible and private and absolutely not a scam nor has it ever been.  Please do your own research before blindly regurgitating monero rhetoric.

Both parties are wrong.  It's not possible for any cryptocurrency to be fungible:


Quote from: r0ach on July 25, 2017, 02:06:05 AM
CT and schnorr sigs will make btc fungible.

Cryptocurrency is NOT fungible.  You're trying to make believe that if coins can be tumbled it's somehow fungible but there is more to it than that.  If anything about the protocol at all can be altered via a strongman or banana republic voting to take over it's exposed power vacuum it's not fungible.  Anonymint even agreed on this at one point in time but he has probably cucked out and did a 180 now that he wants to release a cryptocurrency of his own.

Money = has objective, static traits

Currency = random arbitrary bullshit some guy makes up and constantly fiddles with like fiat or bitcoin. If it's possible for your money to "hard fork", or randomly morph from one thing to another, it's not fungible, and hence not money. In that circumstance you are involved in some type of scheme with a schemer ruling over you.

It doesn't matter if said forks are orchestrated by a banana republic of miners in a voting process. There is no Nash equilibrium in cryptocurrency, only a power vacuum to be filled by a top down hierarchy or strongman. To escape this master and servant hierarchy you have to use real money that cannot be altered or tampered with by third parties.



1292. Post 20411362 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: yermom on July 26, 2017, 11:45:54 PM
Dash is fungible and private and absolutely not a scam nor has it ever been.  Please do your own research before blindly regurgitating monero rhetoric.

Both parties are wrong.  It's not possible for any cryptocurrency to be fungible:


CT and schnorr sigs will make btc fungible.

Cryptocurrency is NOT fungible.  You're trying to make believe that if coins can be tumbled it's somehow fungible but there is more to it than that.  If anything about the protocol at all can be altered via a strongman or banana republic voting to take over it's exposed power vacuum it's not fungible.  Anonymint even agreed on this at one point in time but he has probably cucked out and did a 180 now that he wants to release a cryptocurrency of his own.

Money = has objective, static traits

Currency = random arbitrary bullshit some guy makes up and constantly fiddles with like fiat or bitcoin. If it's possible for your money to "hard fork", or randomly morph from one thing to another, it's not fungible, and hence not money. In that circumstance you are involved in some type of scheme with a schemer ruling over you.

It doesn't matter if said forks are orchestrated by a banana republic of miners in a voting process. There is no Nash equilibrium in cryptocurrency, only a power vacuum to be filled by a top down hierarchy or strongman. To escape this master and servant hierarchy you have to use real money that cannot be altered or tampered with by third parties.

Maybe, and just MAYBE fungibility is a concept that has changed, like everything in life. But who am I

Negative.



1293. Post 20432872 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: jbreher on July 27, 2017, 06:58:14 PM
Yeah. See, the thing is: none of that is dependent upon SegWit. A fix for malleability -- any fix for malleability -- simplifies those advances, but even that is not required for the features of which you speak.

The bitcoin market is in deep shit once the general public finds out Lightning Network isn't a valid scaling solution.  Sure, it works as a CENTRALIZED scaling solution, but not a decentralized one.  Not that the base bitcoin network itself is even decentralized in the first place.  

The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent, but on a long enough timeline, dumping bitcoin for silver (while silver is at the floor) is the best move you can make in the long run right now.  Sure, some idiot could pump BTC higher, but there is no valid scaling solution, and it's useless without scaling.  It's value prospect is also supposed to be based on decentralization, and it's not even decentralized either!  There's no god damn fundamentals for it anywhere!  It's all just a pump and dump scheme at this point.



1294. Post 20433270 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Syke on July 27, 2017, 10:32:25 PM
dumping bitcoin for silver (while silver is at the floor) is the best move you can make in the long run right now.

Sure, you might get 2x out of silver. I see 10x out of Bitcoin as far more likely, even without a scaling solution, just with the block reward halvings to come.

LOL, no.  Silver is the most undervalued asset in the world right now.  If silver was only good for a 2x I wouldn't even bother.  US debt vs gold chart has a 92% correlation, which means gold will head to $2200 in the near future which will see the GSR collapse from 80:1 to 30:1 or lower ($73 silver).  That's a 4.4x even within their rigged system where the price is suppressed, let alone factoring in something like massive money printing or the economic system imploding.  This is what I consider easy money because it's very likely, almost inevitable to occur.  

You would need someone to pump bitcoin to $12,000 to match that trade.  Bitcoin, even though it has crap for fundamentals since it's not decentralized and doesn't scale, might get another pump looking for greater fools to buy next halving, but bitcoin is no longer a cheap penny stock to buy.  The market cap of bitcoin and silver are around the same now.  It's no longer the biggest upside item around because other assets were suppressed by central bankers while they allowed this imaginary, digital asset to rise in order to try and promote a "cashless society" and eventually release their own governmentcoin.



1295. Post 20435185 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: jojo69 on July 28, 2017, 12:14:19 AM


The bitcoin market is in deep shit once the general public finds out Lightning Network isn't a valid scaling solution.  Sure, it works as a CENTRALIZED scaling solution, but not a decentralized one.  Not that the base bitcoin network itself is even decentralized in the first place.  

The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent, but on a long enough timeline, dumping bitcoin for silver (while silver is at the floor) is the best move you can make in the long run right now.  Sure, some idiot could pump BTC higher, but there is no valid scaling solution, and it's useless without scaling.  It's value prospect is also supposed to be based on decentralization, and it's not even decentralized either!  There's no god damn fundamentals for it anywhere!  It's all just a pump and dump scheme at this point.

I don't get this.  BTC doesn't have to be for buying your fucking coffee in the morning.  It can be more like the SDR or bank wires.  I envision it as a settlement structure for very large transactions.  It DOES NOT HAVE TO SCALE!  Use sidechains and altcoins to buy your goddamn starbucks...jesus, this isn't that hard folks.

Also, as someone with an Ag DCA just over $12 I really don't see current prices as a "floor"

Nice product placement for ZeroHedge though, I'll give you that.

Bitcoin has ZERO, I repeat, ZERO value as a settlement layer because there already exists far better settlement alternatives - noble metals (gold and silver).  This is why currencies were always derivatives of them in the past.  Bitcoin has built-in middle men (transaction validators) and counter party risk while metals DO NOT.  Bitcoin is a rent seeking usury system where miners expect to get a cut out of every transaction like the mafia while metals ARE NOT.  

You need to be a complete lunatic to believe bitcoin somehow has better fundamentals as a settlement system than metals.  Can you imagine issuing currencies as a derivative of bitcoin when bitcoin is already only a currency and not money in the first place? LOL.  For the the 500th time, bitcoin is a currency, not money, which is why it's called "cryptocurrency".  The value of currencies are derived from transaction flow, NOT stock.  



1296. Post 20435442 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Gab0 on July 28, 2017, 02:03:12 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1166428.msg13664554#msg13664554


Only 1,5 years ... and now, the same pattern repeat with SegWit adoption.
Choose wisely ... mathematic rules are just.


Very true. I was sympathetic to the idea of increasing block size until I saw a graphic showing it would reach 1tb for the blockchain to be stored in a computer, in case it would increase block size to 2mb.

Then I remembered Ethereum Mist which I had my computer turned on constantly for two weeks to download its blockchain, and it never completed it, making me drop it. And as you know, Ethereum is supported by big corporations, big banks, oligarchies, even Microsoft. Ethereum is very centralized and its creator dictates what happens in that network.

Then it occurred to me the external hd where I have the blockchain is a very old 640gb Samsung, with a usb 2.0 port. And it occurred to me I would never be able to run a bitcoin node again, if it were to increase block size, since 2mb would be only the beginning of a long centralization process.


Don't confuse decentralized and distributed.
https://medium.com/@johnblocke/decentralization-fetishism-is-hindering-bitcoins-progress-11cfa5c7964d

Decentralization is determined by the ability of the general public to be able to MINE BITCOIN, NOT run a fucking node!  Therefore it's COMPLETELY centralized.



1297. Post 20435866 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: GreenBits on July 28, 2017, 02:25:53 AM
im saying all that to say this; want your opinion on if im doing alright using digital gold as a safe haven from bitcoin volatility, or should I just cash out and actually buy some metal, and sit tight. I know ill have more growth potential with the digital gold, due to aforementioned liquidity, but silver/gold are pretty solid. like, bedrock solid.

I wouldn't touch fractional reserve paper metals.  I could type all kinds of stuff about it, but one of the more problematic examples is that they will be forced to revalue metals in the near future and when said event happens, they will settle everyone's GLD account into fiat USD spot price first and immediately revalue right after, so basically a confiscation in practice.  Paper metals are 100% useless.

Quote from: Paashaas on July 28, 2017, 02:35:00 AM
Bitcoin has ZERO, I repeat, ZERO value as a settlement layer because there already exists far better settlement alternatives - noble metals (gold and silver).  

For a legendary newbie member you know little to nothing about Blockchain. You dont know what the differences are between Bicoin and altcoins ore you do know but shilling for gold and silver.

Bitcoins blockchain belongs to the 4th industrial revolution it contains tons of value as a settement layer.

The word "blockchain" is just a hype marketing word to describe a linked list with a get rich quick scheme built on top of it.  It is not a new invention at all or a "new industrial revolution".  The get rich quick scheme was supposed to create incentive for a large mass of participants to enter, which would create some pseudo form of Nash equilibrium amongst thousands of miners, but it failed miserably in decentralization since PoW is designed to centralize and now you have just a handful of mining corporations.  Bitcoin wasn't "created by god", it was just an experiment which did not actually accomplish what it claimed to set out to do.

And hell, that's just the decentralization aspect it failed in.  It also needed to scale to have any value and that aspect went totally fubar as well since lightning network only works in a centralized manner.



1298. Post 20436305 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Torque on July 28, 2017, 02:49:19 AM
Man, we´re going to explode after 1. August, where did i keep my "exploding suit", guys ?

When everyone keeps saying this because everyone is thinking this, it won't happen.

Most people buying bitcoins nowadays know absolutely nothing about whether it does or doesn't have some type of fundamentals (doesn't for decentralization or scaling).  

This is the bitcoin market:




1299. Post 20462983 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Ver is demonized as the bad guy on the forum, but the lightning network doesn't actually function in a decentralized manner, so he might end up being on the right side of history in the end assuming there is no small block miracle scaling solution (it's not gonna be payment channels...that will just benefit interbank transactions)



1300. Post 20479389 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: becoin on July 29, 2017, 04:42:28 PM
Either way is very profitable. If price of fork is higher than we expect we shall get more of Jihan's and Ver's money when we sell it. if price of bitcoin is lower than we expect we can buy more bitcoins.

Or China can go full retard, perform the "anyone can spend" attack by going from legacy bitcoin to segwit, fork back to legacy bitcoin, spend all segwit transactions, and since their BCC chain wouldn't be affected, legacy BTC is now crippled while they pump their BCC coin.



1301. Post 20479706 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 12:41:26 AM
and a coin with 1mb blocks forever has economic viability?
Yes it does.  It would help us secure bitcoin's greatest use case

This is false.  Bitcoin has zero value as a settlement layer because far better alternatives for settlement existed before it's creation (noble metals).  For bitcoin to have value as a settlement layer it would need to be able to compete as the base of Exter's pyramid, but it can't for numerous reasons I've stated before:

1)  Bitcoin has built in middlemen (transaction validators) and counter party risk, negative traits that are typically found among "currencies" and never found among "money".  The entire purpose of the base of Exter's pyramid is to remove counter party risk so that even if everyone else on the planet dies, you are not left holding a worthless coupon.  This is why something is required to be an actual commodity, not a fake psuedo commodity (bitcoin) to be real money.  Bitcoin will always be just a currency alone and not money, and currencies derive value from transaction flow (scalability) not stock.

2)  Money is an abstract concept that represents goods or the ability to do work (services).  This means the ideal form of money would be energy based since it represents both a commodity and service at the same time.  The problem there is that humans don't have the technology to do so and remove counter party risk, and the free market time after time has signaled removing counter party risk is even more important, so it utilized metals.  The fact that anything you do in bitcoin is going to make you a 1 of N participant means there is no removing counter party risk in bitcoin and it's dead on arrival for competing as a settlement system, aka money, aka the base of Exter's pyramid.

3)  All forms of money and currency have elements of a pyramid or ponzi scheme to them, meaning it's all about me finding some resource and hoarding a bunch of it to try and create a master/slave relationship where I now rule over you because I got what you need.  Such a paradigm doesn't actually work with a "virtual" commodity.  If Elwar or Jimbo corners the entire 21 millioin coin market, it really doesn't mean shit to me.  Under no circumstance do I need their coins when they have no intrinsic real world use, so I can completely ignore them and thus no master/slave relationship is formed.  This is also a good reason why gold may lose a lot of it's market cap to silver in the long run due to gold having far less use.



1302. Post 20480335 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: coltsrule7 on July 30, 2017, 02:23:41 AM
and a coin with 1mb blocks forever has economic viability?
Yes it does.  It would help us secure bitcoin's greatest use case

This is false.  Bitcoin has zero value as a settlement layer because far better alternatives for settlement existed before it's creation (noble metals).  For bitcoin to have value as a settlement layer it would need to be able to compete as the base of Exter's pyramid, but it can't for numerous reasons I've stated before:

1)  Bitcoin has built in middlemen (transaction validators) and counter party risk, negative traits that are typically found among "currencies" and never found among "money".  The entire purpose of the base of Exter's pyramid is to remove counter party risk so that even if everyone else on the planet dies, you are not left holding a worthless coupon.  This is why something is required to be an actual commodity, not a fake psuedo commodity (bitcoin) to be real money.  Bitcoin will always be just a currency alone and not money, and currencies derive value from transaction flow (scalability) not stock.

2)  Money is an abstract concept that represents goods or the ability to do work (services).  This means the ideal form of money would be energy based since it represents both a commodity and service at the same time.  The problem there is that humans don't have the technology to do so and remove counter party risk, and the free market time after time has signaled removing counter party risk is even more important, so it utilized metals.  The fact that anything you do in bitcoin is going to make you a 1 of N participant means there is no removing counter party risk in bitcoin and it's dead on arrival for competing as a settlement system, aka money, aka the base of Exter's pyramid.

3)  All forms of money and currency have elements of a pyramid or ponzi scheme to them, meaning it's all about me finding some resource and hoarding a bunch of it to try and create a master/slave relationship where I now rule over you because I got what you need.  Such a paradigm doesn't actually work with a "virtual" commodity.  If Elwar or Jimbo corners the entire 21 millioin coin market, it really doesn't mean shit to me.  Under no circumstance do I need their coins when they have no intrinsic real world use, so I can completely ignore them and thus no master/slave relationship is formed.  This is also a good reason why gold may lose a lot of it's market cap to silver in the long run due to gold having far less use.

Well one could argue that bitcoins value is derived from the work (labor) needed to bring each new bitcoin to market.  

That's just the textbook definition of sunk cost fallacy.  If anything you are just proving my point.  We spend a bunch of time, resources, and energy to create a virtual commodity (bitcoin) that has no real value, especially if bitcoin died.  If you spent all that same time, effort, and resources to dig up silver instead, worst case scenario you could convert them to 29% efficiency solar panels in the end.  It's crazy to waste time and resources on a black hole called mining for an imaginary resource when you can mine for a real resource instead.

Claiming that you NEED bitcoin to send money to China is also another fallacy because as I've stated a million times, bitcoin is only a currency and not money or the base of Exter's pyramid.  Just like the Chinese wouldn't want an infinite stream of digital US T-bills, they would also not want a continuous stream of bitcoins.  They are going to want some type of REAL WORLD good or service for their trade so you will be shipping them something in a large ship anyway.  You do not eliminate the movement of real world goods by using bitcoin.



1303. Post 20480463 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 02:54:52 AM
You don't know that bitcoin's settlement capabilities will shore up the quality of our fiats

Is this a joke?  None of the crap you say makes any sense then you post this horrific shilling for the central banks statement LOL.  The further you abstract money from barter the bigger a scam it is.  Using a physical, commodity based currency (noble metals in native coin format - you know, like gold coins, silver coins, copper coins, etc) is about as close as it gets to barter, which is why it's generally the only non-scam monetary system.

I don't want to hear any of your Keynesian garbage where you attempt to obfuscate the monetary system through a Rube Goldberg machine in order to scam people whether it's bitcoin or some other poorly constructed Rube Goldberg likes the ones CBs already use.  Occam's Razor wins in the end and shekling scammers can BTFO.



1304. Post 20480595 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 03:12:02 AM


Is this a joke?  None of the crap you say makes any sense then you post this horrific shilling for the central banks statement LOL.  The further you abstract money from barter the bigger a scam it is.  Using a physical, commodity based currency (noble metals in native coin format - you know, like gold coins, silver coins, copper coins, etc) is about as close as it gets to barter, which is why it's generally the only non-scam monetary system.

Pure barter was PROVED by John Nash to be not optimal for all parties involved.

And using a physical, commodity based currency like noble metals is NOT pure barter, thus everything you typed is completely irrelevant!  It's the smallest abstraction away from barter needed in order to maintain things like removal of counter party risk, durability, divisibility, fungibility, portability, etc.  I don't want to hear you lies about how bitcoin is the 2nd coming of god as money when it's not even fungible.  Most of you guys are either delusional or serial liars.

No, bitcoin is not fungible even if you tumble it:


Quote from: r0ach on July 25, 2017, 02:06:05 AM
CT and schnorr sigs will make btc fungible.

Cryptocurrency is NOT fungible.  You're trying to make believe that if coins can be tumbled it's somehow fungible but there is more to it than that.  If anything about the protocol at all can be altered via a strongman or banana republic voting to take over it's exposed power vacuum it's not fungible.  

Money = has objective, static traits

Currency = random arbitrary bullshit some guy makes up and constantly fiddles with like fiat or bitcoin. If it's possible for your money to "hard fork", or randomly morph from one thing to another, it's not fungible, and hence not money. In that circumstance you are involved in some type of scheme with a schemer ruling over you.

It doesn't matter if said forks are orchestrated by a banana republic of miners in a voting process. There is no Nash equilibrium in cryptocurrency, only a power vacuum to be filled by a top down hierarchy or strongman. To escape this master and servant hierarchy you have to use real money that cannot be altered or tampered with by third parties.



1305. Post 20480731 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

You're just typing opinion based rambling and not dealing with any of the actual required traits of money.  I typed why bitcoin is not fungible and you avoided that issue like the plague.  You already admitted bitcoin is not a reliable store of value (I would say because it's synthetic price floor is recursive based on it's own demand while metals economics are non-recursive) so we can skip that issue, but all it takes is even failing one aspect like fungibility and bitcoin is not money anyways.  Getting tired repeating myself, but it's called cryptocurrency for a reason.



1306. Post 20480824 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 03:37:47 AM
I typed why bitcoin is not fungible and you avoided that issue like the plague.
In regard to fungibility you have no point to make.  You can cry about fungibility all you want but the markets are rallying behind bitcoin and have no problem with the level of fungibility it has.

Ok, you've already outed yourself as a fraud now.  Anyone can pump and dump anything.  Just because someone makes the price of an asset rise does not grant it objective, non-opinion based traits like fungibility.  You're now arguing from a leftist viewpoint where they claim things like sex and race are social constructs.  No, objective reality exists and cryptocurrency never has and never will be fungible.  Somebody get Trace Mayer the fuck outta here, or whoever this wannabe Trace Mayer is.



1307. Post 20480929 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 03:46:20 AM
I have argued bitcoin doesn't fail and so it doesn't suffer a fungibility problem that has any significance.

Again, more leftist-style nonsense where people claim things like sex and race are social constructs or that you can be 1/2 pregnant.  It's either fungible or it's not, and it's not actually possible for cryptocurrency to be fungible.

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 03:46:20 AM
Bitcoin has threatened your core beliefs and in regard to fight or flight you have chosen to go on a forum that discusses something you know little about and don't support or believe in to fight and argue against it with no intention to seek truth.

This is something that cult members type.  This is why I said I'm probably talking to Trace Mayer.  When you talk about bitcoin and use words like "belief system" it's outrageous.  Bitcoin is simply a linked list with a get rich quick scheme built on top of it.  It's not even a new invention, the linked list has existed a long time.  Bitcoin is not a religion, although you seem to think it is; it's just a plain old Rube Goldberg machine, not the second coming of jesus.



1308. Post 20481061 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Torque on July 30, 2017, 03:55:57 AM
When you talk about bitcoin and use words like "belief system" it's outrageous.

I guarantee you that the first 10, 100, 1000, even 10,000 humans on this earth had to "believe" that Gold or Silver had some sort of value to begin using it as a form of money, as a barter system.

It started with the first 10.

Purely. On. 100%. Belief. And. That. Is. All.

Buttalik Butterin might be an IPO scammer, but he's not a stupid IPO scammer.  There's a reason he said when he first heard of bitcoin he didn't think it would have any value and is still skeptical of the long term viability of any of them.  The fact that he's selling you tokens he thinks might be worthless is a whole other story.  

Anyway, if you look around, you will notice the people who know the most about bitcoin are the most skeptical and wouldn't be surprised if it died, while it's generally people who don't know anything about economics or what a UTXO is either that think it's guaranteed to go to $1 million each.  The exception are motivational speakers like Antonopolous who are probably getting paid by god knows who to go out and shill for bitcoin.



1309. Post 20481223 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 04:08:59 AM
you've touted gold as superior to bitcoin when this is observably untrue as we can see with the charts.

You can stop shilling now, Trace Mayer.  Bitcoin has not yet pump and dumped higher than the combined gold + silver monetary metals market cap, nor does it have the ability to do so.  You already admitted bitcoin is a crap store of value, so if someone believed the market cap of both metals and bitcoin had topped out, they would immediately liquidate bitcoin for metals anyway.  Once you accept this obvious conclusion as fact, it's clear that bitcoin is solely a pump and dump in nature, as are most monetary instruments or substitutes that don't make up the base of Exter's pyramid.



1310. Post 20481287 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 04:22:52 AM
You aren't here looking for truth at all.  

Let me guess, your net "truth" is to try and convince me India has the best schools in the world again.



1311. Post 20481520 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 04:33:40 AM
What is this?




1312. Post 20483179 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: ivomm on July 30, 2017, 06:15:31 AM
Jihan Wu dumped 3K bitcoin on bitfiniex in 5 mins. Only 1% damage. He will see what a real dump is on his BCC on 1 Aug  Grin

As if Jihan Wu is the only dumper in town o_O



1313. Post 20483433 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 07:14:21 AM
Jihan Wu dumped 3K bitcoin on bitfiniex in 5 mins. Only 1% damage. He will see what a real dump is on his BCC on 1 Aug  Grin

As if Jihan Wu is the only dumper in town o_O
Much of your points are no sound economic philosophy.  You've made your own definitions and created an argument that supports your own view but is contradicted by observable reality. You actually don't know anything about the subjects you are commenting on.  

Hey man, I'm not the one posting on an alt-troll acct from being scared.  If what I said about bitcoin and metals fundamentals wasn't true, someone would actually be able to put up some type of argument against it but nobody can. Instead, I got Sidhujag the guy from India, the world capital of gold, trying to troll the forum saying metals are a barbarous relic LOL.  They sell cooked rats on the side of the road in south east asia, don't give me this barbarous relic shit!



1314. Post 20483634 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 07:32:57 AM
quote]ya im sure he's confused.  nonetheless your argument can't be it worked in the past so it will work in the future.  
like its not my fault so many of the people that have been arguing you don't know what they are talking about.

As for economics, you are the (anonymint's favorite word) myopic user of the century.  Debt based currencies require infinite growth to not collapse because the interest due is always higher than the principal.  Since demographics have peaked in every nation that matters and energy output has also peaked while EROI is simultaneously collapsing, this means growth is over and all debt based currency is doomed to implode.  The system will be forced to move to a non-debt based currency whether it's issuing debt free paper like the greenback or changing back to metals.  Regardless of what happens, the dollar dies and metals skyrocket in the process.

There is no fucking scenario on this planet in which metals don't skyrocket because they are the Schelling point when debt based currencies blow up.  You can live in some alternate dimension pontificating on some random bullshit Nick Szabo said, but none of that changes this objective reality that will occur.  Stocks are also garbage in this paradigm because they're mostly based around infinite consumer growth as well, but the govt may or may not manipulate that market to whatever number they choose before it all blows up.



1315. Post 20484056 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: hv_ on July 30, 2017, 07:59:34 AM
quote]ya im sure he's confused.  nonetheless your argument can't be it worked in the past so it will work in the future.  
like its not my fault so many of the people that have been arguing you don't know what they are talking about.

As for economics, you are the (anonymint's favorite word) myopic user of the century.  Debt based currencies require infinite growth to not collapse because the interest due is always higher than the principal.  Since demographics have peaked in every nation that matters and energy output has also peaked while EROI is simultaneously collapsing, this means growth is over and all debt based currency is doomed to implode.  The system will be forced to move to a non-debt based currency whether it's issuing debt free paper like the greenback or changing back to metals.  Regardless of what happens, the dollar dies and metals skyrocket in the process.

There is no fucking scenario on this planet in which metals don't skyrocket because they are the Schelling point when debt based currencies blow up.  You can live in some alternate dimension pontificating on some random bullshit Nick Szabo said, but none of that changes this objective reality that will occur.  Stocks are also garbage in this paradigm because they're mostly based around infinite consumer growth as well, but the govt may or may not manipulate that market to whatever number they choose before it all blows up.

There is no black or white. There is no ideal. Not in real world. Its only in our mind and the only way to try to understand a bit of this. Einstein, Nash tried it. The model is not a reality...

But nice discussion  Grin
Its so human

In the land of the market fundamentals blind, the r0ach with 4000 eyes is king.



1316. Post 20484308 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: savetherainforest on July 30, 2017, 08:24:14 AM

In the land of the market fundamentals blind, the r0ach with 4000 eyes is king.


R0ach.. u'r like that old man before being kicked out of his home by his kids. He gets desperate and aggressive at the very end when he comes to the realization what is actually happening to him.  Smiley




1317. Post 20485227 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: fluidjax on July 30, 2017, 08:25:59 AM
There is no fucking scenario on this planet in which metals don't skyrocket because they are the Schelling point when debt based currencies blow up.  You can live in some alternate dimension pontificating on some random bullshit Nick Szabo said, but none of that changes this objective reality that will occur.  Stocks are also garbage in this paradigm because they're mostly based around infinite consumer growth as well, but the govt may or may not manipulate that market to whatever number they choose before it all blows up.


Point is, i've been waiting for fiat to blow since people starting saying this on the internet about 15 years ago. It's coming.... It's coming.... but it hasn't come yet.

If it doesn't come in my life time, frankly I couldn't give a shit, and my kids can deal with it Smiley

So, Roach if you are so sure its going to happen, please give me some numbers, how likely a 'currency blow up' is, in 1, 2,  5, 10, 20 years. Put your money where your mouth, and make it quantifiable, or are you content with it's coming, but have no idea when?

I typed it up into a full r0ach report:

https://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-21-so-you-want-to-know-how-long-until-the-system-blows-up



1318. Post 20485731 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: fluidjax on July 30, 2017, 09:36:32 AM
Something between a few months to 24 months is probably pretty accurate.  All I know is, unless they manage to kill everyone on the planet with nukes, the Yids aren't going to be able to contain silver and it's going to make me a lot of money.


Thankyou for pinning it down, and your explanation. I'm counting down till July 2019 Smiley

You should really lay-ff the anti-semitic stuff, I understand it's probably a strongly held belief of yours, but for most people at the very minimum it irritates and therefore clouds your argument.

Why? Be the change you want to see in the world.  In the words of right wing death squad leader Duterte:





1319. Post 20498672 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 30, 2017, 09:03:10 PM
- lots of John Nash quotes -

People who are unable to do anything but parrot an "authority figure" are the ones who have no understanding of economics.  Do you think anyone would care about what Nash said if he just parroted someone else?  It's not possible for any craptocurrency to defeat metals as the base of Exter's pyramid (lowest settlement layer) because bitcoin has built-in rent seeking middlemen and counter party risk.  You could even claim that since bitcoin requires a constant net energy/resource input >0 to appease these middlemen and not implode, that it's technically a debt based currency in practice.  It's just not lended into existence like a traditional one.

A typical debt based currency has a constant resource drain where the whole of society has to pay the interest rate (which is always higher than the principal and requires infinite growth) or the system dies.  In bitcoin, the miners just take the place of the bankers who the interest rate has to be paid to...or the system dies.  PoW is also designed to centralize, so you end up with the exact same type of central bank bank model bitcoin claims to be there to defeat. There is really no reason whatsoever to use bitcoin over gold and silver.  Metals actually remove counter party risk, don't have rent seeking middlemen, scale, and have no pseudo debt based element to them.



1320. Post 20500459 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: pfrtlpfmpf on July 30, 2017, 11:49:10 PM
It all really confuses the heck out of me.

What is there to be confused about?

Bitcoin - a peer to peer distributed but not decentralized corporation coin.

We aren't gonna defeat the Yids with this shit.  #InPhysicalSilverWeTrust



1321. Post 20500734 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: pfrtlpfmpf on July 31, 2017, 12:21:27 AM
It all really confuses the heck out of me.

What is there to be confused about?

Bitcoin - a peer to peer distributed but not decentralized corporation coin.

We aren't gonna defeat the Yids with this shit.  #InPhysicalSilverWeTrust

Talk to the hand . . .




1322. Post 20501488 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 31, 2017, 12:28:04 AM
Szabo

If he was a credible person before, he's not anymore after working on an R3 banker backed IPO scamcoin called Ethereum so you can stop pretending he's god now.  You're from India where people worship authority figures and the state, so it's kind of obvious how your behavior is playing out where you constantly feel the need to cite some authority figure as the word of god without being able to put 2+2 together yourself.



1323. Post 20501611 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 31, 2017, 01:48:32 AM
Szabo

If he was a credible person before, he's not anymore after working on an R3 banker backed IPO scamcoin called Ethereum so you can stop pretending he's god now.  You're from India where people worship authority figures and the state, so it's kind of obvious how your behavior is playing out where you constantly feel the need to cite some authority figure as the word of god without being able to put 2+2 together yourself.
Yes we have already established you don't understand the purpose of central banking and so you fear it.  But you will get no reasonable person to admit that Szabo is irrelevant.

The people who claim Szabo is Satoshi are the real joke, because of his actions being willing to work on the R3 banker scam Ethereum, it would also mean that if he's Satoshi then bitcoin would also probably have been released as a govt/banker backed scam (aka how to make a mint).



1324. Post 20502345 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 31, 2017, 02:13:48 AM
You have said bitcoin can't work and yet reality shows it does

Of course it doesn't work.  It's value is supposed to be based on decentralization yet it's completely centralized.  You make this buffoonish statement that it "works" just because there are entities trying to pump and dump it. A pump and dump does not validate something.  

Does "chaincoin" work just because someone pump and dumped it from 5 cents to $6 before it crashes to nothing again?  Everybody knows bitcoin completely failed at what it claimed to be set out to do.  Right now it's sole reason for existing is regulatory arbitrage - avoiding the legal system.  It's not actually required to be decentralized to accomplish that goal.  For example, bitcoin's centralized money laundering operation precursor:  The Liberty Reserve.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Reserve



1325. Post 20502470 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 31, 2017, 03:14:23 AM

Of course it doesn't work.  It's value is supposed to be based on decentralization yet it's completely centralized.  You make this buffoonish statement that it "works" just because there are entities trying to pump and dump it.  A pump and dump does not validate something.  Does "chaincoin" work just because someone pump and dumped it from 5 cents to $6 before it crashes to nothing again? LOL.
You are denying reality and by YOUR OWN DEFINITION wasting your life on this forum.

The purpose of bitcoin is regulatory arbitrage and that's why even though bitcoin is completely centralized it has not failed yet.  Being decentralized is not a requirement of regulatory arbitrage.  For past examples see Liberty Reserve or Silk Road.  Being a centralized regulatory arbitrage network is an untenable position in the long run though, as can be seen by the fate of those other attempts at regulatory arbitrage in the past.  Mining pools and exchanges are a stupidly large attack vector so anyone can shut this centralized nonsense down whenever they want to.



1326. Post 20502601 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 31, 2017, 03:26:43 AM
they have to tend towards more valuable currency or they lose their customers:

Your claim that central banks have to "invent" a more competitive form of money than other alternatives in the market is shockingly dumb.  Government is a monopoly on force.  The banks took over the government.  They are not here to "compete", they are here to use force to scam you.  There is no "competing" required besides deploying a larger amount of force than you can.  Any random fool on this forum knows that.



1327. Post 20502876 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 31, 2017, 03:43:31 AM
Regarding the velocity of money, if the increase in the use of Bitcoin leads to a decrease in need for holding dollars, it would increase the dollar’s velocity of circulation and tend to increase the money supply associated with any given amount of base money

More illogical nonsense.  Government is a monopoly on force.  Do you not know what the fucking word monopoly means?  If they want you to use dollars, worst case they just shoot you if you use something else.  Everything revolves around how much resources they're required to spend to stop you.  It requires VERY FEW resources to lock down the internet, exchanges, and mining pools to stop bitcoin, while it takes several orders of magnitude more resources to run a police state in the real world and prevent people from using metals.



1328. Post 20503349 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 31, 2017, 04:10:05 AM
There is an entire constitutional framework that limits its power and protects the freedoms of the citizens that give it its power.  

Yea, that's the sci-fi channel explanation.  Force is the only valid consensus mechanism and everything else is meaningless, unless you can figure out some way to stop 4 grams and 1800J of energy with words.



1329. Post 20503660 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: dakiller on July 31, 2017, 04:36:44 AM
Can the very off topic discussions stop, and go off to some other thread? Less economic policy arguments and more Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion, for which this thread is for.

I cry everytime

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPKMLAuat10



1330. Post 20525544 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on July 31, 2017, 02:11:10 PM
Even if you were ultra evil and wanted bcc to usurp btc you still wouldn't trade your bitcoin for bcc.

Lol?  While it would be inconvenient for a few people, I fail to see how such an action would be "evil".  If anything, trying to force the entire planet onto a single blockchain with extremely limited scaling would be the evil choice since it's inherently PRO-USURY.  I'm not a religious person, but what's the only time in the bible Jesus got violent with people?  Flipping over the tables and kicking out the usury Yids from the temple.

If you weren't a lying scammer solely trying to pump your own investment, you would logically pick the "non-evil" solution to be everyone dumping the fuck out of any currency with limited scaling and built in rent seeking, usurious middlemen (meaning all cryptocurrency), and purchasing gold or silver instead.




1331. Post 20527644 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Michael Pento says metals will have broken all time highs by late 2018 and bitcoin useless:

https://youtu.be/U3qHMPgYy4c?t=1432



1332. Post 20527932 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Torque on August 01, 2017, 04:23:57 AM
Michael Pento says metals will have broken all time highs by late 2018 and bitcoin useless:

https://youtu.be/U3qHMPgYy4c?t=1432

His quotes:
"That's the beauty about gold... it's extremely limited in supply" [as if bitcoin's aren't??]
"...and neither of those attributes [such as limited supply] can be said about ANY digital currency" WTF??

I happen to like Mike Pento, but he really needs to do some more research on Bitcoin before he makes such statements.

He's not stupid, he knows there's 900+ craptocurrencies and there's more incentive to create your own new pump and dump like Ethereum rather than be forced to buy someone else's already cornered scamcoin.  There will always be a market incentive to create new coins as well rather than people paying $5, $10, $100, or $1000 transaction fees.  The greater fool concept only works if people actually need what you have.  

If Elwar corners all 21 million bitcoins, guess what?  It doesn't mean anything to me.  I can just ignore him and go on with life and use metals or create my own craptocurrency to bypass him.  If I corner all $40 billion or so of above ground silver, you don't get to bypass me since it's actually a non-virtual good that's used in lots of things.  A "virtual commodity" as a concept definitely ranks up there as one of the biggest economic scams of all time.



1333. Post 20528253 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Dafar on August 01, 2017, 04:51:11 AM
Michael Pento says metals will have broken all time highs by late 2018 and bitcoin useless:

https://youtu.be/U3qHMPgYy4c?t=1432

His quotes:
"That's the beauty about gold... it's extremely limited in supply" [as if bitcoin's aren't??]
"...and neither of those attributes [such as limited supply] can be said about ANY digital currency" WTF??

I happen to like Mike Pento, but he really needs to do some more research on Bitcoin before he makes such statements.

He's not stupid, he knows there's 900+ craptocurrencies and there's more incentive to create your own new pump and dump like Ethereum rather than be forced to buy someone else's already cornered scamcoin.  There will always be a market incentive to create new coins as well rather than people paying $5, $10, $100, or $1000 transaction fees.  The greater fool concept only works if people actually need what you have.  

If Elwar corners all 21 million bitcoins, guess what?  It doesn't mean anything to me.  I can just ignore him and go on with life and use metals or create my own craptocurrency to bypass him.  If I corner all $40 billion or so of above ground silver, you don't get to bypass me since it's actually a non-virtual good that's used in lots of things.  A "virtual commodity" as a concept definitely ranks up there as one of the biggest economic scams of all time.

No, he's pretty stupid if he thinks gold will outperform bitcoin lol  Roll Eyes

The market cap of above ground silver and bitcoin is similar now.  Bitcoin is no longer some cheap penny stock.  The US gold vs debt chart with 92% correlation shows gold will hit at least $2200 in the next bull run, which would bring the GSR to 30:1 or lower ($73 silver).  Bitcoin would need to hit $12,000 to compete with that almost guaranteed silver upside in the near future.  

But that's a very conservative number for just a stable market situation.  In a real crisis situation and rush to hard assets, gold would be more like $5000 and $166 silver or more.  Or a government metals revaluation of gold to $10k and silver to 1:15 ratio of astronomically high numbers like $600 silver.  Bitcoin would need to be able to hit $100k each to compete with that possible silver upside.  It will never happen.  Big corporations will just create their own scamcoins and try to force people into them and the crypto market cap will be divided up between 50 different coins (also due to poor scalability and high fees), unlike the metals market where you can't just "invent" a new gold or silver and are forced to buy the real thing.



1334. Post 20528380 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: bones261 on August 01, 2017, 05:11:48 AM


The market cap of above ground silver and bitcoin is similar now.  Bitcoin is no longer some cheap penny stock.  The US gold vs debt chart with 92% correlation shows gold will hit at least $2200 in the next bull run, which would bring the GSR to 30:1 or lower ($73 silver).  Bitcoin would need to hit $12,000 to compete with that almost guaranteed silver upside in the near future.  

But that's a very conservative number for just a stable market situation.  In a real crisis situation and rush to hard assets, gold would be more like $5000 and $166 silver or more.  Or a government metals revaluation of gold to $10k and silver to 1:15 ratio of astronomically high numbers like $600 silver.  Bitcoin would need to be able to hit $100k each to compete with that possible silver upside.  It will never happen.  Big corporations will just create their own scamcoins and try to force people into them and the crypto market cap will be divided up between 50 different coins (also due to poor scalability and high fees), unlike the metals market where you can't just "invent" a new gold or silver and are forced to buy the real thing.

Revelation 13:16-18
Maybe the mark is a QR code.  Grin

If such a thing as the "mark of the beast" was actually real, I'm sure a lot of cucks in the west will take it, but it has around zero hope of spreading worldwide so you can always go somewhere else.  Does it look like you can force the "mark of the beast" on the Chechens for fucks sake?  The national pastime is pretending to be rambo:



You would need to nuke all of Russia and all kinds of other groups to make it happen.  Which is probably exactly why the evil Jews who have taken over the US govt are attempting to do exactly that.




1335. Post 20528422 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Dafar on August 01, 2017, 05:18:16 AM
Menials will prefer bitcoin over gold, it's much more useful and upside is much higher.

Millenials have...zero money lol.



1336. Post 20528687 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on August 01, 2017, 05:28:07 AM
You are not making a coherent argument.  

Funny how you keep spamming this nonsense of calling metals a "barbarous relic" while all other 999 million people in your country of India are buying metals like I am.  You can be the one single guy in India with no gold or silver! Someone might even put you in an insane asylum for having such views there.



1337. Post 20532111 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Segwit turned into "sellwit" just like it did for Litecoin on release date.  Ironcially, both were probably pumped by the exact same Chinamen.



1338. Post 20550863 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on August 02, 2017, 02:29:33 AM
Can anyone solve this problem?




1339. Post 20551247 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Ibian on August 02, 2017, 02:35:19 AM
There is no founded argument that increasing 7tps increasing the value.  Economics doesn't support it.  

This is the dumbest sentence I've ever seen on this forum.  The burden of proof isn't even on others to prove increasing throughput increases value, the burden of proof is actually on you to prove that bitcoin has any value whatsoever as a settlement network and that 4 TPS would somehow allow it to fill this role.  

I've already explained numerous times why bitcoin has zero value as a settlement layer:

1)  It has built-in rent seeking middlemen (transaction validators) and doesn't remove counter party risk since you're always relying on all kinds of external parties to facilitate transactions

2)  Alternatives already exist before the creation of bitcoin that are far superior for settlement such as gold and silver that actually do remove counter party risk and don't have built-in rent seeking middlemen

3)  Network effect assumes infinite scalability, which bitcoin doesn't have.  Trying to force everyone onto a highly scaling constrained system with giant fees is a pro-usury stance

4)  Due to the above , bitcoin has a reverse Schelling point where there's huge incentive to fork or use a different system rather than pay extortion usury fees.  Low scaling = inveitable rough consensus attack/split.

5)  Bitcoin is a currency and not money.  The value of a currency is entirely based on transaction flow, not stock (how much commerce it can facilitate by scaling)

6)  The greater fool theory only works if other people actually need what you have and nobody needs an imaginary "virtual commodity" when they can just create their own.  They do however need things like silver.  Cornering the market on bitcoin doesn't actually give you any type of power over others, while cornering real commodities like oil or silver does.



1340. Post 20551460 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

After seeing every other industry try to low labor costs and outsource to India, the computer graphics industry tried it and it totally failed because Indians were unable to compete in art or creativity.  Now here we have traincarswreck/sidhujag from India who is unable to do anything besides parrot Nick Szabo, one of the ringleaders of the Ethereum scam while pretending he's the word of god.  If you're unable to explain or back some type of view on your own, don't bother posting.



1341. Post 20552482 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Torque on August 02, 2017, 03:43:50 AM

I've already explained numerous times why bitcoin has zero value as a settlement layer:

1)  It has built-in rent seeking middlemen (transaction validators) and doesn't remove counter party risk since you're always relying on all kinds of external parties to facilitate transactions

2)  Alternatives already exist before the creation of bitcoin that are far superior for settlement such as gold and silver that actually do remove counter party risk and don't have built-in rent seeking middlemen

You keep saying this. Over and over again. But it's NOT TRUE AT ALL if you want to transact in PMs with someone not just down the street (like in another state or another country). Or want to transact a HUGE amount of PMs. In both scenarios which you need armored cars and middlemen seeking transport/transaction/storage fees.

You have no point.  If someone is buying 100 pounds of crack rocks, it doesn't matter if he's paying with bitcoin or metals.  He would need to show up in person and utilize some type of security, otherwise he's operating solely on a reputation system or the word of the other person to send him the goods.  Your statement is completely irrelvant in comparing bitcoin and metals since it affects both the same.  But, my statement was OBVIOUSLY not referencing that type of counter party risk.  

If I own metals, a blackhole or something needs to hit the earth to destroy it.  There is no counter party risk.  If I own bitcoin, it's FULL of external actors and variables that can undermine the system and kill it.  Even innocuous so called "upgrades".  Maybe Luke Jr wants the block size to be 1 kilobyte while another guy wants it to be 20 gigs.  The fact that they don't agree can cause the system to implode or fracture.  Stop playing stupid and pretending bitcoin isn't full of external variables completely out of your control that cause huge counter party risk. 

As for buying stuff from other countries, bitcoin doesn't magically eliminate the need for sending stuff by boats.  You don't get to make believe there's always going to be a giant manufacturing plant in the sky called China where you send infinite amounts of digital US T-bills or bitcoin to, and China will be perfectly happy with accumulating an infinite stream of these worthless things and never want real world goods in return for them.  And no, you don't have to ship gold or silver to them to pay is because activities like this are handled by import/exporters that bring the goods your country doesn't produce to you already.  

You only have to transport metals between banks in your own country, and they're perfectly capable of doing that.



1342. Post 20552792 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 02, 2017, 03:53:41 AM
or the hashpower wars will drag on until the bitcoin landscape becomes derelict and eventually a failed experiment.

It already is a failed experiment.  Decentralization isn't based on the ability to run a node like all the kooks in bitcoin claim, it's the ability to be able to mine coins yourself instead of being forced to buy them from a 3rd party. Being a failed experiment allowed it to become so centralized that it created a large profit motive for the people it centralized around to pump it higher for personal gain.  In this case, price going up has nothing to do with success.  Just like how the majority of coins that rise to the top of coin market cap page do so from being centralized pump and dumps.



1343. Post 20552899 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Dafar on August 02, 2017, 05:06:58 AM
Lol r0ach mad he didn't make no free money BCC  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




1344. Post 20553038 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

It will be interesting if the chinamen pull their hashpower from BTC and go to BCH, then Luke Jr will be forced to fork bitcoin to unstick the 4 hour blocks before the chain dies.  Then we'll have forks crawling out of our ears and all kinds of arguments over what the real bitcoin is.



1345. Post 20556087 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: becoin on August 02, 2017, 06:24:52 AM
Why are bigblocktards so dumb?

So much BCH hatred.  The blocks just want to propogate and they're met with a hate movement by Marcus & friends.




1346. Post 20579284 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 03, 2017, 03:34:44 AM
Forking guys have no idea what they have unleashed ... it will become apparent soon now.




1347. Post 20579363 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on August 03, 2017, 04:39:43 AM

Are you retarded Ibian?  You think that merely because 51% of mining power supports something then bitcoin should just change because of that?  Maybe you should think about how unstable such a rule would cause bitcoin to become?
I'm pretty sure thats the deal bro. We all signed up to it.

I like how people claim bitcoin isn't a failed experiment then claim if miners use their hash power to cause some type of change that it's invalid even though that's the way bitcoin is designed LOL.



1348. Post 20579796 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on August 03, 2017, 05:06:44 AM
the developments that come AFTER segwait are more important then segwit itself.

Let the developments commence!




1349. Post 20581227 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on August 03, 2017, 06:14:06 AM
im looking for anyone here who thinks they can hold a candle to me in regard to the macro economic implications of bitcoin

The fact that you claimed increasing the throughput of bitcoin would have zero benefit to price when everyone knows it's current throughput is poor kinda put you in the mentally impaired category without us needing to go over any other issues.



1350. Post 20584393 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: traincarswreck on August 03, 2017, 05:41:46 AM
I think roger ver might have stole the gox coins

Possible Ver and Putin collusion?




1351. Post 20609047 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Asrael999 on August 03, 2017, 07:49:35 PM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-02/bitcoin-etf-approval-odds-are-way-analyst-says

It wouldn't be good if an ETF was approved IMO.  

Do you really want a bunch of 90 year old retired people having their life savings tied up in this nonsense that can crash to 0 at any second of the day?  Yea, it would be a good exit scheme for you, but a disaster for everyone else. Kinda like how if I bought a used car from some old senile guy and paid him with silver I would feel it's a fair trade, but if I paid him in bitcoin I would feel like I scammed him since the coins have no real value and can implode to nothingness at any moment.  

Bitcoin should really only be used by crackdealers attempting regulatory arbitrage or crimelord money launderers like JayJuanGee and not normal humans which are served better with real and non-imaginary assets.



1352. Post 20609266 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: empowering on August 04, 2017, 08:52:44 AM

It wouldn't be good if an ETF was approved IMO.  

Do you really want a bunch of 90 year old retired people having their life savings tied up in this nonsense that can crash to 0 at any second of the day?  Yea, it would be a good exit scheme for you, but a disaster for everyone else. Kinda like how if I bought a used car from some old senile guy and paid him with silver I would feel it's a fair trade, but if I paid him in bitcoin I would feel like I scammed him since the coins have no real value and can implode to nothingness at any moment.  

Bitcoin should really only be used by crackdealers attempting regulatory arbitrage or crimelord money launderers like JayJuanGee and not normal humans which are served better with real and non-imaginary assets.


You are hilarious...


It's bad enough pensions require 8% yearly returns from stocks to not implode and cause massive civil unrest.  The last thing they need to do is add a BTC ETF into that mix and have the value bounce up and down 50% per day or implode to 0 from some type of security problem or other issue.  The ETF will inevitably just be used to create fractional reserve BTC anyways to suppress price and direct people back to the dollar.  

The only people who actually benefit from it are a few large holders like the Winklevoss or Digital Currency Group attempting to liquidate their overpriced coins on clueless and geriatric baby boomers while they would have problems finding liquidity to do it without one.  So all the ETF really is is just an exit scheme.  

Do you really think old people and retirees should be investing in this stuff?  I sure as fuck don't.  Gold and silver are the Schelling point for money when the dollar goes south, NOT cryptocurrency, so geriatric people shouldn't be diverting a cent to this stuff and eventually having it blow up in their faces.



1353. Post 20609567 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on August 04, 2017, 09:02:54 AM
... sleazy shilling dressed up as logic ...
This is great news for bitcoin.
You know they're getting desperate when they send for Peter R.

He was right, though.  The fact that BCH has fast difficulty adjustment and bitcoin doesn't while the Chinese control most of the hash power is gonna be mega-problems for BTC.  I imagine all BCH has to do is NOT DIE and it will cause Luke Jr to be forced to fork BTC to change difficulty adjustment.  Since BTC is now forced to fork, people will probably want a bunch of other changes like PoW algo change as well.  It's a real can of worms here.

Having said that, I vew any chain with a fixed blocksize and low scalability being nothing more than an extortion, rent seeking usury system.  If you're promoting the whole planet pile into a 1 MB blocksize coin, all you're doing is promoting usury.  The only way to fix that paradigm is use a scaling blocksize like Monero.



1354. Post 20610198 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Elwar on August 04, 2017, 09:42:11 AM
I just want to go with whichever chain allows me to buy a coffee now...and when I am an old man looking back 50 years from now I can point to that transaction and say "that was my transaction...it was a coffee and it was delicious".

Why not just use physical silver and then you don't have to worry about all your transactions being tracked and monitored in an Orwellian-style dystopia?



1355. Post 20610667 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: d_eddie on August 04, 2017, 09:59:55 AM
I like to consider my hedl BCH as an insurance on the unlikely black swan of BTC losing value as the real chain.

You are correct.  Random noobs on this forum INCORRECTLY stated that the only valid game theory path was to dump BCH (think it was derived from some nonsense Szabo said).  He made the error of assuming you're required to keep one token at all.  The real optimal path is to dump both of them in event of rough consensus attack, meaning what's going on right now.  If you refuse to dump both for whatever reason, then the optimal path to try and minimize loss would just be to hold all of them.



1356. Post 20611076 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on August 04, 2017, 10:18:06 AM
You are correct.  Random noobs on this forum INCORRECTLY stated that the only valid game theory path was to dump BCH (think it was derived from some nonsense Szabo fabricated).  He made the error of assuming you're required to keep one token at all.  The real optimal path is to dump both of them in event of rough consensus attack.  If you refuse to dump both for whatever reason, then the optimal path to try and minimize loss would just be to hold all of them.

I like and own several other cryptocoins, and still I consider BCH a joke of a shitcoin.

Yea well, I consider bitcoin a useless shitcoin compared to physical silver coins, but holding bitcoin has been more profitable recently.



1357. Post 20611339 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

A funny thing happened on the way to the bullion market:

Quote from: OROBTC on August 02, 2017, 05:01:13 PM
Provident Metals had stopped taking Bitcoin as payment!  That was a shock, so I had to open an account with jmbullion.com who still did.  I have not checked back with Provident to see if they have changed their minds, but for whatever reason they stopped taking BTC

Interestingly, you used to receive the max discount for using bitcoin on JM Bullion (same as paying with check or bank transfer), but now it's more expensive to pay with BTC there lol.  So bullion dealers no longer like people paying with BTC for whatever reason even though they stated people who purchased using bitcoin spent more money than normal customers.



1358. Post 20627414 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: jbreher on August 04, 2017, 03:45:11 PM
Ever since [Bitcoin Cash -ed] launched, I see more and more trolls and shills for that shitcoin on this thread. And they all seem to be really irritated. Likely because their precious coin keeps falling in price.

In this moment, I am serene.

What special interest groups neglected to tell you about the block size issue:

From an economics point of view, trying to force the entire planet onto a fixed block size with low scaling is a pro-usury extortion stance.  Small blocks are a synthetic monopoly.  If criminal banks believe they can take control of this monopoly, either through getting a large percent of the transaction validators, or by taking control of all services that facilitate off-chain transactions like Coinbase (or lightning) since on-chain transactions are too expensive to use, then the criminal banks would likely support small blocks over large ones.

The solution to the problem is not 1 MB or 8 MB blocks.  Any system with a fixed block size is going to inherently be a pro-usury extortion scheme due to synthetic monopoly.  You would need to use a dynamic, scaling block size like Monero to fix that.



1359. Post 20627858 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Ibian on August 04, 2017, 12:07:43 PM
your dumb metal

The goyim knowing level is increasing:




1360. Post 20627977 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: RayX12 on August 05, 2017, 02:22:45 AM
Looks like this this rocket is pumping up!

This must be the make believe lightning network is a valid scaling solution rally when it won't work except in a centralized manner.



1361. Post 20631170 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 05, 2017, 06:22:52 AM
... $3200, where the fux is adam?

What next, $32,000?

Adam stole the $3200 number from me.  It was the max upside potential dump target before another halving occurs.  The earlier halvings have a large chance of increasing price, but the next ones are kind of a crapshoot when inflation is only 4% already.



1362. Post 20632327 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Lauda on August 05, 2017, 07:36:03 AM
I said I'd post a special gif of myself once we surpass $3000, and this was quite some time ago






1363. Post 20649275 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Bitcoin is a non-aggregate market that's been controlled almost entirely by a single entity on Bitfinex all the way from $200 to now so things like fib extensions mean all of jack shit.  This is why I call it a pump and dump.  If the price is controlled almost entirely by one entity, what the hell else would it be?  People make believe the price is moved by a bunch of small players....LOL.  The number of people who move this market up or down takes less than one hand to count.  It was like that when the price was $200 and it's the same way now.



1364. Post 20655923 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on August 05, 2017, 07:29:03 PM
what this one? https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6rqvdg/announcing_bcash_a_new_cryptocurrency_with_zcash/

anyway, no. whichever new coin comes along, worrying is verboten, bitcoin can absorb all these.

Death by rough consensus attack.  Heil silver!




1365. Post 20657910 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Comments on newest Molyneux video = right wing death squads imminent




1366. Post 20675559 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

r0ach proven right by zerohedge - Bitcoin market is a Gox-style fraud controlled by Bitfinex

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2070166.0



1367. Post 20675927 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 07, 2017, 02:17:19 AM
The only reason he (Buffet) dumped his silver position was because he was basically warned off by the banksters that it would blow up their fiat monetary scam if he persevered

And here we have Marcus accidentally admitting the Jewish criminal bankers want you buying bitcoins and not silver at all costs.  If you're buying something the bankers want you in, you are going to get demolished.




1368. Post 20677444 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 07, 2017, 02:22:30 AM
The only reason he (Buffet) dumped his silver position was because he was basically warned off by the banksters that it would blow up their fiat monetary scam if he persevered

And here we have Marcus accidentally admitting the Jewish criminal bankers want you buying bitcoins and not silver at all costs.



Idiot, you've got your wires-crossed ... silver is easily and demonstrably totally controlled, bitcoin is not. Your choice, idiot.

LOL, no.  All they can do in metals is naked short it down to cost of production.  As I've explained numerous times before, you can actually destroy Bitcoin with shorts since there is no real cost of production floor.  There is only a temporary, synthetic floor due to current mining hash rate.  If you just lump on some bitcoin shorts and constantly drop it below cost of production, all the miners (like KNC) will be forced to turn off, dropping it's synthetic price floor even lower.

Even if cost of production was once $10,000 per coin, this economic attack by shorts can drop the price floor down to barely anything.  There's no reason for anyone to buy your older $10,000 cost of production coins when they can now just mine new ones off the never ending block reward (from transaction fees), so the current synthetic price floor crashing also destroys value of all previously mined coins.  If the post-attack price floor is $100, that is now the value of your horded stash.

Bitcoin is far more vulnerable to economic warfare than metals are, and anyone who denies it is 100% lying.  This is why you need to be a complete fool if you haven't figured out the only way the bitcoin price can go up is if the government specifically sanctions to allow it, because it's ridiculously easy to kill it via shorts from the ESF.  The government (aka bankers) are allowing it to go up because they want you to buy this imaginary asset and not gold or silver.  You are being herded like dumb cattle out of real wealth and into imaginary wealth that can vaporize at any second.



1369. Post 20680190 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Searing on August 07, 2017, 07:14:08 AM


by the by the bitcoin cash alt that 'shall not be mentioned' is up 10% wtf?

(so confused...the longer I'm in crypto .the more stuff to become 'clueless' about......can't keep up)

Over 900 imaginary assets (including bitcoin itself) all have a value over 0.  Looks perfectly rational to me!



1370. Post 20685241 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: J_A_Bankster on August 07, 2017, 10:52:02 AM
and also the real bitcoin is a liberation for all of humanity..

When I say the real Bitcoin, of course I mean Bitcoin Cash... Which soon enough will be reclaiming its name as: Bitcoin

Neither 1 MB or 8 MB blocks is a solution to the problem as I outlined here:

Quote from: r0ach on August 05, 2017, 01:42:28 AM
What special interest groups neglected to tell you about the block size issue:

From an economics point of view, trying to force the entire planet onto a fixed block size with low scaling is a pro-usury extortion stance.  Small blocks are a synthetic monopoly.  If criminal banks believe they can take control of this monopoly, either through getting a large percent of the transaction validators, or by taking control of all services that facilitate off-chain transactions like Coinbase (or lightning) since on-chain transactions are too expensive to use, then the criminal banks would likely support small blocks over large ones.

The solution to the problem is not 1 MB or 8 MB blocks.  Any system with a fixed block size is going to inherently be a pro-usury extortion scheme due to synthetic monopoly.  You would need to use a dynamic, scaling block size like Monero to fix that.



1371. Post 20685913 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: steelboy on August 07, 2017, 12:00:23 PM
Is there anything that makes you truly happy R0ach? Like overflowing with joy happy?

Yes, total war:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aABLnazbDic




1372. Post 20687256 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: oda.krell on August 07, 2017, 12:42:10 PM
Is there anything that makes you truly happy R0ach? Like overflowing with joy happy?

I think we all know the answer. His problem is that the people doing it were stopped 72 years ago.

If you would like to be enslaved by the jews we can always pack your bags and send you to Israel.  However, normal people have no interest in living under their debt based usury currency, media propaganda, Soros run rapefugee invasions, feminism, endless wars, or other evil schemes.  They're a neurotic, demented people of poor character who always form a state within a state to the detriment of the native inhabitants and that's why they're always expelled from every nation on earth.  They even admit to running the human organ trafficking rings.  Just about anything horrible on the planet these people are the masterminds of:

http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.610986




1373. Post 20687709 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: oda.krell on August 07, 2017, 01:20:52 PM
Terrifying genocidal shit.

Please stop.

I like to think of it as the purgatory you have to go through in return for the profits that can be made here.

Kind of like how in the American revolutionary war against the British, only like 1% of the population actually fought them while everyone else were just cuckolds.  The same will be true in the fight to free the planet from Jewish media and banking organized crime.  Oda.krell was one of the worthless cuckolds on the sidelines yelling, oh god, don't fight the British, thats sexist or rayacism or something!



1374. Post 20688017 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Meuh6879 on August 07, 2017, 01:39:26 PM


Meuh is spamming us with pictures of cuckolds




1375. Post 20702808 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Torque on August 07, 2017, 11:18:58 PM
I get a little nervous when MSM starts actually turning pro-bitcoin. I always think, "Why are they suddenly promoting it? What's in it for them?"

Congratulations for being the only non-idiot in the thread.  Bitcoin is a tool for them to try and keep people out of the highley strained metals market only being propped up temporarily by rehypothecation while also helping acclimate people into the de-cashing of society and integration into a cashless society control grid.  They'll allow bitcoin to go up a bit then mercilessly implode it and claim "Oh, so sad, that darn bitcoin is just not dependable and was used by too many launderers and criminals anyway.  We'll have to issue a government coin that's much more dependable with built in KYC so people won't lose money!"  

Too bad for them this plan doesn't work.  Western investors are literally mentally retarded and metals demand drops off a cliff when the price is low while demand is huge in the rest of the world like China right now.
Westerners always jump in to FOMO buy at the top and don't buy anything at the bottom.



1376. Post 20703317 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: jojo69 on August 07, 2017, 05:04:28 PM
The relationship between the chosen people and the rest of humanity has been...complex.

It is possible to recognize the over representation of a certain ethnicity at the top of the fiat pyramid without the pathetic display of ignorant hate exemplified by the ignored one.

The history is very long, and painful for both sides, only through dialog based on fact can humanity hope to move forward on this.

^Spoken like a true cuckold.  This has been a huge problem for thousands of years now and even if one generation of Jewish usurers and thieves dies off, they are immediately replace by a new one.  They always form a state within a state of their host nation then try to undermine and practice usury against them until you get rid of them.  It's a never ending cycle.  

At some point you have to recognize that if they refuse to police their own kind, you're required to make the Machiavellian choice of:  Okay, it's either going to be us or them.  Do I want to be a slave forever or get rid of them and live free?  This was the basis of the so called "final solution".  If you just throw one of their Bernie Madoffs in jail it doesn't even put a dent in them so that's pointless.  If you expel their entire population from your country - as so many people have done over 100 times now - they just take over a new country and use that population as cannon fodder to go to war against you based on their usual schemes and lies.

It is clear you have already acknowledged the Jewish problem in your own post.  Your only problem is that you're not a man, you're a cuckold, and would prefer to live as a slave rather than face the unpleasantries of dealing with the slave masters.



1377. Post 20711783 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: orpington on August 08, 2017, 04:09:56 AM
I get a little nervous when MSM starts actually turning pro-bitcoin. I always think, "Why are they suddenly promoting it? What's in it for them?"

Congratulations for being the only non-idiot in the thread.  Bitcoin is a tool for them to try and keep people out of the highley strained metals market only being propped up temporarily by rehypothecation while also helping acclimate people into the de-cashing of society and integration into a cashless society control grid.  They'll allow bitcoin to go up a bit then mercilessly implode it and claim "Oh, so sad, that darn bitcoin is just not dependable and was used by too many launderers and criminals anyway.  We'll have to issue a government coin that's much more dependable with built in KYC so people won't lose money!"  

Too bad for them this plan doesn't work.  Western investors are literally mentally retarded and metals demand drops off a cliff when the price is low while demand is huge in the rest of the world like China right now.
Westerners always jump in to FOMO buy at the top and don't buy anything at the bottom.

I'm afraid this metals shit will never pan out, sorry. And I actually hold a fair amount of physical PM's. Good thing I got into bitcoin.

Kind of irresponsible to be recommending dead-in-the-water metals. Too much of a long shot unless you're praying for an apocalypse.

Much better to get into bitcoin, turn a profit, then buy a few coins and bars for fun but they'll never really amount to much anyways.

Not sure why you push gold and silver so much. Its kind of laughable. What a shitty investment atm. Price will probably drop lol.

It's laughable you have so many scamming children claming bitcoin is going to be the new world reserve currency when it has poor fundamentals as both money and currency.  It's useless as a settlement unit (money) due to having built in rent seeking middlemen (transaction validators) and doesn't remove counter party risk.  Those are attributes you find in things like fiat currencies, not real money.  It also performs poorly as a currency due to huge overhead from triple entry accounting (and Lightning network doesn't function in a decentralized manner so don't even give me that bs).  

It's designed to perform bad at anything you would want a monetary instrument to do while also not being fungible either.  But such things don't interest mindless children, all they care about is if Jim Cramer gives it a thumbs up or not.  Meanwhile, all the smart money in the world is buying low instead of high and getting metals while the Jewish banking ESF has manipulated them down to cost of production.  Metals are the Schelling point when faith wanes in debt based fiat bills, not bitcoin.



1378. Post 20712057 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on August 08, 2017, 11:35:02 AM
Fuck that noise. I'm thinking $5k is achievable sooner than we'd expect.

looks like someone forgot that in the past BTC crashed 90% or so. Now it would mean plunging back to $300.
I would not bet the farm on a single scenario, even thanks to the imminent mining wars with that alt.cash thing.

I think this whole thing is going to collapse like a house of cards once people figure out lightning network does not and never will work in a decentralized manner.  Literally NOTHING has changed in bitcoin in the last 5 years. Decentralization is not solved (it's completely centralized), scaling is not solved, the only thing that's solved is knowing a single entity (probably Bitfinex owners) control the price on their fraudulent exchange.

Quote from: Ibian on August 08, 2017, 11:39:24 AM
Bitcoin has better economic properties than gold and fiat, comparisons have been made years ago. You are boring, roach.

100% lie.  LOL "comparisons", you mean comparisons from paid shill pumpers like Antonopolous?  Bitcoin has far worse fundamentals than metals as money, nor is it even fungible so doesn't qualify as money in the first place.  You people have lied to yourself so many times you're starting to believe your own nonsense.  We're talking about imaginary super mario tokens vs real world goods here.  Since the fucking thing is imaginary, the most it can be is just an IOU.  Right now you can ditch your IOUs for something that actually does have value, but that will not always be the case.



1379. Post 20713016 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: bitserve on August 08, 2017, 12:19:12 PM
If Litecoin Segwit activation process is of any reference to Bitcoin, we should expect a sharp rise when lock-in is certain

Litecoin dumped like someone jumping off a building soon as segwit activated (probably because segwit changes mostly nothing since lightning network will only work in a centralized manner).



1380. Post 20728208 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: Youghoor on August 08, 2017, 05:32:08 PM
so dont worry people, bitcoin will always go up.

lets go guys, lets buy more!!

This is why bitcoin is scary now.  There's all kinds of trailer park people and penny stock scam artists all over youtube and other venues that have no idea how bitcoin works (or is supposed to work but doesn't) spamming nonsense like this constantly.  Although Marcus is somewhat technically proficient and also pushes the same delusions, that the price can only go up and it's impossible to go down lol.



1381. Post 20735794 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: savetherainforest on August 09, 2017, 06:42:07 AM
Can we gas the kikes already, so i dont have to see these posts anymore.

Better Call R0ach! He's an expert! Smiley

We have a more effective solution:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TldZPwUW12g



1382. Post 20885041 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

I would like to thank everyone for getting in nice and high before the short down to test the trend lines:




1383. Post 20886339 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: gizmoh on August 15, 2017, 05:56:00 AM
Roach, the jew hating white supremacist , still shilling from silver-tardness.   Grin

It sounds like someone needs to be liberated by the dodge challenger of freedom.



1384. Post 20931208 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: Icygreen on August 16, 2017, 03:00:58 PM
We are talking about a whole new payment system/platform and a store of value that is by far superior to any existing financial system and store of wealth (gold sucks FYI).
If I have a gold or silver coin sitting on the table, I do not have to pay extortion fees to some miner just to be able to spend it.  


But you'll need to transport that gold or silver coin to the person accepting it. Ask a millennial if they think value should be stored digitally online or in a physical coin

Ask a "millenial"? HAHAHAHAHAHA

Yes, let me consult some reverse evolution millenial children with mental disorders that check their iphone over 200 times per day on important financial matters.  No, we do not live in a "digital world" you millenial cucks. I keep seeing you people constantly spam this propaganda now (probably govt shills who want to de-cash society so they can have their slave control grid).  If your life is "digital" then you have no life because the digital world is mostly meaningless and imaginary.  Probably why Zerohedge ran a story the other day talking about how the suicide rate for all these dumb millenial kids is off the charts.

It doesn't matter what the millenial bolsheviks want.  There are concrete, objective traits that will always move the invisible hand of the market to a predetermined destination which anyone who is capabale of doing real fundamental analysis already knows the answer to.  You people have done literally zero homework on fundamental analysis and don't even know it's not possible to create a decentralized digital currency in the first place. "Distributed"(meaningless), yea; "decentralized", no.

PoW is designed to centralize while PoS starts centralized and becomes even more so over time.  They should both be called proof of monopoly.




1385. Post 20944696 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: jbreher on August 16, 2017, 09:24:45 PM
The satellite allows those people to also be able to get the Blockstream's approved version of the blockchain (well part of it, only new blocks right now)
FTFA

You people need to stop pretending it's even possible to create a decentralized cryptocurrency in the first place.  Nothing resembling a Nash equilibrium will EVER exist in these things, only an exposed power vacuum to be taken over by a monopoly man or cartel.  If Satoshi is not a govt stooge, this is why he's gone because it's a dead end and there's nothing he can do to fix it.  If he is a govt stooge, well you're probably not going to want to promote some propaganda tool to try and "de-cash" society to create a new slave control grid.  It's a lose/lose scenario regardless.



1386. Post 20945068 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: fabiorem on August 17, 2017, 03:47:04 AM
The satellite allows those people to also be able to get the Blockstream's approved version of the blockchain (well part of it, only new blocks right now)
FTFA

You people need to stop pretending it's even possible to create a decentralized cryptocurrency in the first place.  Nothing resembling a Nash equilibrium will EVER exist in these things, only an exposed power vacuum to be taken over by a monopoly man or cartel.  

To use silver as currency you need to mint them, and you need consensus so that the merchant might accept it. Also silver coins are defined by purity, less pure coins value less and so are used to buy cheaper stuff. In the past silver coins minted by foreign authorities were weighed by merchants and were valued according to their weight. However you can't carry too much silver coins inside your pockets, and they call attention from people who might steal them from you.

With bitcoin you can carry a chest full of silver inside a cellphone. And you can put a password on it so nobody can steal it. You will still need consensus, which is the primary requirement for any currency.

Nice false equivalence tactics you shills.  You start with the premise that bitcoin is actually valid when it's not because it's designed to centralize and it's value proposition is supposed to be based on decentralization.  Therefore it has no actual value if going by fundamentals alone.  It's also not fungible, has built-in middlemen, and doesn't remove counter party risk, so the most it can be is a currency like dollars or airline miles and not money.  

As for silver, in the old days people transacted in coins minted by the state usually.  At this point in history people didn't have access to knowledge and technology to verify if the silver was real or not so they were transacting entirely on the basis of the state's insignia.  In other words, they were still using the equivalent of fiat.  However, in the 21st century the state's insignia is now irrelevant because it's very easy for the common man to test if the silver is real or not such as resonance test, specific gravity test, magnet test, etc.  There are even free phone apps where you can just ping the metal and the microphone picks it up and tells you if it's real .999 silver by the resonance.  

This means metals in the past were no different than fiat, but now metals are no longer fiat anymore.  Technology has allowed them to be assessed by anyone without the state's seal being required.  Worst case scenario, places like grocery stores would just use handheld xray units like this to detect metal content in seconds:

http://www.bruker.com/products/x-ray-diffraction-and-elemental-analysis/handheld-xrf/s1-titan-series/overview.html

So yea, welcome to the 21st century you fools, where metals became an even stronger form of money due to technology, while it's still impossible to create a decentralized digital currency, thus digital currency has no value.  



1387. Post 20947478 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on August 17, 2017, 05:08:32 AM
The underclasses are coming for your private keys!

That was the basis of the book "The Revolt Against Civilization: The Menace of the Under-Man":

"The author rails against the moronic, rebellious, Bolshevik Under Men of the world and suggests "world eugenics" to remedy their impending takeover and the ruin of civilization"

In other news, either Jews are joining the alt-right now, or these are Jewish agent provacateurs trying to incite violence at Charlottesville:






1388. Post 20955605 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Whoever thinks bitcoin can't be destroyed with ease when it's network traffic isn't even obfuscated should take a look at the case of The Daily Stormer, who big corporations have essentially censored it from the internet in a time span of two days:

https://blog.cloudflare.com/why-we-terminated-daily-stormer/

https://www.rferl.org/a/u-s-neo-nazi-website-russian-domain-daily-stormer/28680409.html

First they came for the nazis, but I didn't speak out, because I was not a nazi.



1389. Post 20976784 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: ghandi on August 17, 2017, 01:26:05 PM
Whoever thinks bitcoin can't be destroyed with ease when it's network traffic isn't even obfuscated should take a look at the case of The Daily Stormer, who big corporations have essentially censored it from the internet in a time span of two days:

https://blog.cloudflare.com/why-we-terminated-daily-stormer/

https://www.rferl.org/a/u-s-neo-nazi-website-russian-domain-daily-stormer/28680409.html

First they came for the nazis, but I didn't speak out, because I was not a nazi.

You understand the technical differences between a server-based Hosting and DDoS Protection and a decentralized peer-to-peer Network?

Doesn't matter.  The Cloudflare CEO guy's point was clear, that there is already a monopoly on the internet where all it takes is a couple of corporations - let's say ISP providers such as Comcast and AT&T - to blacklist something and it's gone if the traffic is not completely obfuscated.  You can't blacklist gold and silver from existing, but the internet is already a corporate and/or government monopoly so it's not hard to do with anything here.  

Without the govt even outlawing something, corporations can destroy it just as easy.  Yea yea, you can then log onto a Somalian bitcoin exchange via proxy after all 1st world mining and exchanges are shut down, but nobody even accepts bitcoin in native form.  The only places that accept bitcoin do so with Bitpay and immediately convert to fiat.  Remove the ability to convert to fiat and bitcoin is useless.  It's current existence is a centralized currency that's a derivative of another currency, while only gold and silver are actually money.

The only reason the government allows this nonsense to exist for now is to try and acclimate the goyim into the de-cashing of society and integration into a digital only slave currency control grid.  That and to try and prevent people from buying gold and silver because the market is stretched too thin and they're running out of metals to deliver which would blow up their ponzi.



1390. Post 20977206 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

I don't have anything against Gmaxwell, but comments like this point out that bitcoin is nothing more than a technocratic dictatorship:

Quote
the 2MB from segwit is more than enough for current loads

How can you even claim something is "decentralized" when people speak like this in the demeanor of a central planner in Beijing?  Yea yea, we've heard the "only rocket scientists should be allowed to design the rockets" meme before, but there's no reason anyone should willfully submit themselves to a technocracy when you can live as a free man with no ruler and just use gold and silver instead.  Bitcoin is a step BACKWARDS in freedom, not forwards.

Centralized mining, centralized development, price based on artificial scarcity of coin count, fee system that doesn't work without artificial scarcity of block size.  The whole thing is honestly a complete joke compared to metals.  If anything is based around magic numbers and artificial scarcity, any price above zero is also going to be artificial.  

Promoting that everyone on earth use the same artificially scaling constrained coin is also an extreme pro-usury stance since it's inevitable fees would be astronomical (LN doesn't work in a decentralized manner either to fix that). The only way to fix it would be a dynamic block size like Monero, but then people would just pile onto it and it would cease functionining and implode anyway.  There are no solutions to any of this stuff.  All roads in digital currency lead to a huge step backwards from gold and silver in terms of sound money and freedom.



1391. Post 20978518 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: ghandi on August 18, 2017, 07:16:23 AM
I'm sorry, but you got this thing wrong. You cannot easily shutdown Bitcoin without taking down the whole Internet.

Yea right, even if you change the ports, you're not using randomized ports, and even if so, the ISPs can still detect who is running bitcoin nodes or other activity on their network and just say "sorry, we're turning off your connection because we do not support people laundering money with bitcoin", or whatever other excuse they want to make.  The corporations would even run their own nodes as a honeypot to sniff people out.  It's mostly a stupid argument since governments are far more likely to eradicate bitcoin through legislation than by pseudo-govt entities like Google, Comcast, or AT&T doing it under a corporate umbrella, but still, corporations can put a big dent into bitcoin viability if they want.



1392. Post 20978671 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: orpington on August 18, 2017, 07:32:37 AM
I'm sorry, but you got this thing wrong. You cannot easily shutdown Bitcoin without taking down the whole Internet.

Yea right, even if you change the ports, you're not using randomized ports, and even if so, the ISPs can still detect who is running bitcoin nodes or other activity on their network and just say "sorry, we're turning off your connection because we do not support people laundering money with bitcoin", or whatever other excuse they want to make.  The corporations would even run their own nodes as a honeypot to sniff people out.  It's mostly a stupid argument since governments are far more likely to eradicate bitcoin through legislation than by pseudo-govt entities like Google, Comcast, or AT&T doing it under a corporate umbrella, but still, corporations can put a big dent into bitcoin viability if they want.

Well, I for one do appreciate that you are just trying to "save us all" lol

The fact that a guy was essentially banned from the entire internet (the daily stormer - the #2320 most popular website in America) and prevented from running a website or practicing free speech (because jews don't want the goyim to know what they're doing like destroying 1st world white nations by flooding them with rapefugees on purpose) while not actually breaking any law is kind of an Orwellian precedent whether you like the site or not.

Daily Stormer - #2320 in popularity
Infowars.com - #828
MSNBC          - #529

As you can see, the zionist propaganda outlets like CNN, MSNBC, etc, are starting to get worried their propaganda is collapsing and no longer fools people.



1393. Post 20981221 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: ghandi on August 18, 2017, 08:12:40 AM
Free speech in the US is kind of weird (in my personal opinion). I live in germany. We have free speech too

Lol, no.  Neither nation has free speech:

http://steemit.com/politics/@r0achtheunsavory/the-alt-right-didn-t-land-on-tel-aviv-tel-aviv-landed-on-us

And while they prevent free speech from occuring, they attempt to flood 1st world white nations with 3rd world invaders because all homogeneous populations (such as Iceland did) eventually overthrow their usury banking parasites or kill them, so they flood the country with lots of different warring factions as a divide and conquer strategy so nobody can ever come together against your economic oppressors - Nash equilibrium by rapefugee invasion if you will.

These plans were all detailed 50 years ago to try and genocide white europe:

https://smashculturalmarxism.wordpress.com/2015/02/03/genocidal-kaufman-and-hooton-plans-for-germany-became-the-reality-for-all-of-western-europe/



1394. Post 20983449 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: ghandi on August 18, 2017, 11:52:16 AM
So let's accept we are all doomed and i little sheeple just await the end. This saves me a lot of otherwise lost time. See you there! Cheesy

Nobody is doomed, we just repeat ww2 all over again as nationalists vs the international marxist jews:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFIuATI0558

As you can see in that short video, history has repeated itself exactly because the marxists jews won ww2 and enacted all of the exact same actions over again, forming a state within a state and monopolies in media and finance (and govt by proxy) through nepotism to the detriment of the native inhabitants to try and rule over them as slaves.  This is engrained in their make believe talmudic doctrine that you are "goyim" slaves and they are the "chosen ones" to rule over you. If anyone attempts to enslave you, it's perfectly reasonable to defend yourself and expel them.

Just like Hitler said "are you willing to be plundered?", and the answer is no.  There are no "everyone wins" choices in this.  Most famous leaders through history had to make many Machiavellian choices where lots of people lose. Hitler is framed as the most "evil" leader, when in reality, people like Caesar were probably more brutal; yet nobody demonizes Caesar because...the Gauls Caesar fought don't control the media to use as their personal propaganda outlet, but the people Hitler fought do.



1395. Post 20983971 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: aesma on August 18, 2017, 12:42:16 PM
Real estate isn't really "stuff".

It's a hell of a lot more "stuff" than make believe super mario tokens.  The only downside is that in lieu of hyperinflation, the price of real estate should collapse to 1/2 or less of what it is now, so they will likely print us into hyperinflation to prevent deflationary collapse since it's the lesser evil of allowing the system to continue for a brief period longer.  Silver is one of the few underpriced assets on the entire planet right now, while gold is also lower than it should be, but not anywhere to the extent of silver.



1396. Post 20984058 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: aesma on August 18, 2017, 12:46:08 PM
So let's accept we are all doomed and i little sheeple just await the end. This saves me a lot of otherwise lost time. See you there! Cheesy

Nobody is doomed, we just repeat ww2 all over again as nationalists vs the international marxist jews:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFIuATI0558

As you can see in that short video, history has repeated itself exactly because the marxists jews won ww2 and enacted all of the exact same actions over again, forming a state within a state and monopolies in media and finance (and govt by proxy) through nepotism to the detriment of the native inhabitants to try and rule over them as slaves.  This is engrained in their make believe talmudic doctrine that you are "goyim" slaves and they are the "chosen ones" to rule over you. If anyone attempts to enslave you, it's perfectly reasonable to defend yourself and expel them.

Just like Hitler said "are you willing to be plundered?", and the answer is no.  There are no "everyone wins" choices in this.  Most famous leaders through history had to make many Machiavellian choices where lots of people lose. Hitler is framed as the most "evil" leader, when in reality, people like Caesar were probably more brutal; yet nobody demonizes Caesar because...the Gauls Caesar fought don't control the media to use as their personal propaganda outlet, but the people Hitler fought do.

Jews didn't attack Hitler. Hitler invaded countries.

Jews attack people every day through usury and economic warfare.  Their intelligence agencies' motto is "by way of deception".  They don't field troops on a battlefield due to their small number.  They would be crushed instantly.  Everything is done by backstabbing, subterfuge, and other dishonest manipulation and trickery.  They're a pathetic, Woody Allen-like paper tiger that can only do things like financial manipulation and media propaganda.  As soon as they are named and exposed to the general public, they and all of their Goldman Sachs and federal reserve snakes will be destroyed.  It's getting close to that time now.



1397. Post 20984283 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: aesma on August 18, 2017, 12:51:48 PM
Usury was the job Christians gave Jews when they banned them from other jobs.

Lol, that's a great lie you got there.  Religions ban usury because it's just an evil, obfuscated form of slavery, yet they're going to allow others to practice this evil against them?  Yea, no.  Many of these Ashkenazi Khazars aren't even real jews.  They converted to Judaism in the 5th century AD or something to avoid war with christians and muslims, then started trying to insert themselves as middlemen into these nation's affairs and lending to their kings to wage war against each other.  

They then decided why go through a middle man like a king when they can just issue the money directly to the citizens as a loan (debt based currency), so they were instrumental in overthrowing the monarchs in places like the French revolution.  The entire history of the modern world is nothing but Jewish economic warfare trying to enslave the common man.  They are parasites that have to be expelled.  It doesn't matter if not all of them are guilty of it. The facts through history show that if you only throw one or two of their Bernie Madoffs in jail, they are instantly replaced by new ones.  This is why so many nations have expelled ALL of them, over 109 times and counting.

Anyone that has a shred of knowledge on finance or history is against this evil cult.



1398. Post 20989431 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: bitserve on August 18, 2017, 01:36:50 PM
The real state bubble exploded years ago. Maybe in some places/locations/type of property there is still some overprice.... but there are LOTS of great buying opportunities.

I don't think you've studied real estate whatsoever.  The previous real estate bubble that crashed has mostly re-inflated right back into the same bubble as before.  I guess a few rural places might have been left out, but not any contested places or high traffic areas.  Also, back in the old days (when really old people like JimboToronto were alive) you could buy a house with like 2-3x the average yearly salary.  Now home prices are like 10x the average yearly salary.

This was solely a function of the bankers manipulating the market into a state permanent NINJA loans and getting the government to backstop their losses if it all blows up on them by everyone defaulting.  Meaning if banks did not exist and everyone had to pay cash for houses, the prices would be extremely low since nobody can extend the payment process over 30 years.  If everyone on the planet can take out a 30 year NINJA loan, this means people who wouldn't even need a loan to buy a house before now need to take out a loan to get one too.

People buying up all the houses using zero collateral (many times the bankers themselves) create artificial scarcity, thus skyrocketing prices so you're required to labor decades more than normal for the same house.  It's in the banker's interest to create housing bubbles because it forces the entire population into taking out loans which they otherwise would not need, or a giant transfer of wealth from the bottom 99% to the top 0.000000001% in other words.

The housing market is starting to look up, though.  Pretty soon we'll all be saying "remember back in the old days before the bankers were holocausted (this time for real)?":





1399. Post 20990258 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: bitserve on August 18, 2017, 04:18:00 PM
You usually talk about "cost of production".... well, there you have an example of a new apartment that is CLEARLY BELOW cost of construction.

Sunk cost fallacy affects items worse the further away you get from the base of Exter's pyramid.  A house isn't like gold or silver which is both portable and virtually indestructable, it realies on numerous external factors like schools, crime, jobs, govt, etc.  They say Detroit is a clear case of, "a house is only worth as much as there are jobs there to support it".  That and most people don't want to live in a neighborhood where all 10 of your neighbors are named Tyrone.



1400. Post 20997240 (copy this link) (by r0ach) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: Lauda on August 18, 2017, 05:51:39 PM
I dislike the current dump. Angry