All posts made by Cassius in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 6016580 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.31h):

Quote from: windjc on April 01, 2014, 10:33:08 AM
damn what a dumb move closing that short with peanuts for profit.

That wasn't your problem. You did very well there. The problem was that you didn't have enough coins to short because you didn't load up enough below $450.
On bfx you can use USD as collateral to short. I actually could have shorted about 8 times more than I did.

Didn't know that. I'm still new there. Isn't that like naked short-selling? I mean there still has to be someone willing to lend you the coins in a swap, right?

You had to pay a swap cost, I'm assuming. That means if you had a huge pile of coins, you could lend them out without exchange rate risk. Another benefit of having a big stash. The risk isn't any higher than keeping fiat on the exchange.


You are borrowing btc from other traders. Yes there is a swap cost but the swap cost on btc is negligible compared to the swap cost on usd.  USD runs 0.1%-1% per day while btc runs 0.01% per day or less.

Yes. Shorting is practically free. You can short 300k a day for less than $100.

Not if you get it wrong...



2. Post 6051908 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: mooncake on April 03, 2014, 01:18:21 PM
Key points of Huobi's announcement:

1. Huobi has checked with their third party payment service providers and banks and was informed that no instruction from PBOC had been received.
2. Huobi will stop all third party payment services on 05-04-2014.
3. Huobi will ramp up its manpower to 7*24 on internet fund transfer. All bank deposits and withdrawals are not affected.

I'm still trying to get my head around the China thing. A while ago Stamp/UK banned deposits via Transferwise and other third parties for AML reasons. It was a pain in the butt as it made things more expensive and awkward, but you could still use a regular bank account.
Is this roughly the same deal (at least for now)?



3. Post 6052299 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: mooncake on April 03, 2014, 01:42:33 PM
Key points of Huobi's announcement:

1. Huobi has checked with their third party payment service providers and banks and was informed that no instruction from PBOC had been received.
2. Huobi will stop all third party payment services on 05-04-2014.
3. Huobi will ramp up its manpower to 7*24 on internet fund transfer. All bank deposits and withdrawals are not affected.

I'm still trying to get my head around the China thing. A while ago Stamp/UK banned deposits via Transferwise and other third parties for AML reasons. It was a pain in the butt as it made things more expensive and awkward, but you could still use a regular bank account.
Is this roughly the same deal (at least for now)?

It is different.

Thanks, that is about as enlightening as a PBOC statement.



4. Post 6065151 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on April 04, 2014, 07:36:29 AM
Whats going on in china up 5% in 2 hours?

Because there is no China ban?
Because we went down 100's because of a rumour?
Because people are sheep?

Frenzied trading right up until the moment they pull the plug for good?



5. Post 6086898 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: igorr on April 05, 2014, 06:37:19 PM
I will not buy that shit anymore. Totally useless  crap those cryprocurrency are
until i can pay with BTC for my Pizza, in grocery store of for other daily life services, i would prefer real money.


How much did you get burned by?
Not much, "just" about 250 Euro. Still good money. Anyway that was pretty good experiment, life experience, so to say:)

With your money Bitcoin will be live, without your money Bitcoin will die.

Dammit, he's right. Thanks a lot chromosoma, your lost 250 EUR has killed bitcoin.



6. Post 6107987 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: igorr on April 07, 2014, 10:33:22 AM
320
250
180
130

Much bored.
-> ignorr



7. Post 6111554 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: FelixO on April 07, 2014, 03:09:22 PM
interesting, at what value  people will think the bitcoin  story is over and will mass dump everything?
200$? 100$?

Good question. I think 380 is psychologically important and below 200 would probably be a decision point for even hardened hodlers

Depends when they got in. For hardened HODLers who bought in at $800-1200, what's the point? Might as well sit it out and see what happens.



8. Post 6111906 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: oda.krell on April 07, 2014, 03:27:06 PM
I personally doubt that after  fall to 100-200$ bitcoin will rise again.
Just scare to think about all those people who newly  bought  all those gridseeds, dragons with  THs of power, thinking they will  get money back.
But now, difficulty is still rising, and value is falling. This hardware will never  ever get your money back.

Is htere any other  purpose for SHA256 ASICs? Can you hack protected files with it?Smiley

Where do people get this retarded idea from that "Bitcoin is dead if it falls below price x".

Oh yeah, I know: from the same jumping-to-conclusions part of the brain that tells them "we never fell below the previous ATH, so it can't happen this time either"...

1) Consensus is that bitcoin will increase in value by an order of magnitude every year, until the end of time.
2) (More seriously) I see this as a dotcom crash scenario. Yes, the crash in price will convince a lot of miners and other companies to rethink (i.e. exit and try something easier). But few serious businesses expect to make money in the first year. The ones that will survive and provide value will have thought of this and realised that this is a long-term (meaning longer than 3 months) game. The fall just cleans up the landscape faster than otherwise would have happened.



9. Post 6129907 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 08, 2014, 06:23:34 PM
We're not going anywhere, period, unless someone is willing to buy above 453 or sell below it.  In the past 90 minutes I see 15 minutes during which trades occurred.

The relevance of exchanges to the bitcoin economy may be waning.


you seem to be forgetting heartbleed.

you can't log into to bitstamp.

That was quickly patched.  More quickly than some old money online banking web sites from what I understand.

https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=bitstamp.net



Bitstamp log-ins have resumed? 

DDOS mitigation providers not yet patched. News is on Stamp's front page.



10. Post 6138083 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

What evidence do we have that bitcoins are being bought up off-exchange? Obviously Second Market. Bitcoin days destroyed? Anecdote? Other?



11. Post 6152957 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: magicmexican on April 10, 2014, 08:29:00 AM

Why is huobi suddenly panic buying?

Gox users kept going right up to the wire. Probably people trying to make a frantic last buck before the ship finally goes down.
-> uncertainty won't be over until the 16th (or possibly 12th, since I think this is when banking services will be withdrawn?).



12. Post 6153015 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: sharky101 on April 10, 2014, 08:37:01 AM
Institutional investor ready and waiting...

Huh



13. Post 6153429 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: dreamspark on April 10, 2014, 09:14:46 AM
People whats going on?

We are close to 400 and there is no volume at all! Do something!

To be honest I think most of the news was already priced in and people have been taking their positions over the last few days.

However this is just the announcement and the deadline is not for a few more days so no doubt theres people waiting to buy until after that...

it gets extended in the Reddit I read regarding huobi, to the 18th lol. However real question is some are saying this is a call, oral communication. It is possible a very successful social engineering hack to FUD us to death lol.

I can't imagine the pboc not putting this shit in writing lol .. or they really are just brake pumping till they can think of better controls, which will never occur


Who knows its a mystery at this point, I beleive the oral communication part was between Huobi and their bank though not their bank and pboc?

I believe it was in person. I wouldn't assume that because it's not in writing it's less significant. China doesn't work the same way as US/Europe.



14. Post 6153520 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: macsga on April 10, 2014, 09:23:21 AM
Is anyone active on chinese forums? What is the general conensus there?

Fuck it, I'll get the hell out of BTC.
Fuck it, I'll transfer my BTC to an exchange outside of China.

?

General consensus is 保持


Chinese for HODL?
I'm not sure that's what they're saying in China...



15. Post 6153541 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: dreamspark on April 10, 2014, 09:25:45 AM

I'm saying that a change in cash flow due to something actually happening has a real and direct affect on the market regardless of what speculators think and is almost impossible to prepare for or 'price in'.

Okay, well I agree with you to a point but its not impossible to prepare for, if you anticipate based on the news that the price will drop due to exchanges bank accounts being closed then that is preparing for it, thus it gets priced in slightly.

Are you attempting to suggest that the price drop due to the confirmed news would have been the same amount even if people had not already heard it was likely and taken a position based on that.

I won't speak for TERA, but 'news' is 'priced in' on guesswork. When banking services are withdrawn, we'll see how accurate the guesswork was.
This happens all the time, hence xxx news report saying 'shares rose as earnings exceeded expectations' or whatever.



16. Post 6154570 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: KFR on April 10, 2014, 10:33:51 AM

The difference now is that China has actually got to a sustainable solution. Now they have found a solution which provides the capital control they desperately needed without completely banning a revolutional technology. Similar to the compromise that they came to with the internet as whole.

Sorry for bothering but what's the solution they found? (somehow I managed to miss it)  

Today, BtcTrade and Huobi join OKCoin, FXBTC, and BTC38 in announcing an end to their acceptance of Chinese RMB deposits via bank card recharge. It is worth re-mentioning that Bitcoin is not banned in China. China has merely forced Chinese Bitcoin exchanges to operate outside of Chinese banks, fiscally. China wants to limit the amount of Bitcoins that can be bought by Chinese citizens to a measly $50,000 USD worth annually, thus limiting capital flight by that method.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/22obst/stop_the_fud_china_is_not_banning_bitcoin/

+1

Some of us have been trying to make that point for a while.  If China wanted to ban Bitcoin, it would... well... ban Bitcoin. Cool



Not really. Banning bitcoin would mean banning the internet. Choking exchanges hamstrings bitcoin and it's more practical (i.e. it actually has an effect) than deeming it illegal.



17. Post 6154711 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: KFR on April 10, 2014, 11:12:03 AM

The difference now is that China has actually got to a sustainable solution. Now they have found a solution which provides the capital control they desperately needed without completely banning a revolutional technology. Similar to the compromise that they came to with the internet as whole.

Sorry for bothering but what's the solution they found? (somehow I managed to miss it)  

Today, BtcTrade and Huobi join OKCoin, FXBTC, and BTC38 in announcing an end to their acceptance of Chinese RMB deposits via bank card recharge. It is worth re-mentioning that Bitcoin is not banned in China. China has merely forced Chinese Bitcoin exchanges to operate outside of Chinese banks, fiscally. China waPrecnts to limit the amount of Bitcoins that can be bought by Chinese citizens to a measly $50,000 USD worth annually, thus limiting capital flight by that method.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/22obst/stop_the_fud_china_is_not_banning_bitcoin/

+1

Some of us have been trying to make that point for a while.  If China wanted to ban Bitcoin, it would... well... ban Bitcoin. Cool



Not really. Banning bitcoin would mean banning the internet. Choking exchanges hamstrings bitcoin and it's more practical (i.e. it actually has an effect) than deeming it illegal.

Precisely my point. Cool

China has analysed Bitcoin and concluded that it's both a) practically unstoppable just like the Internet itself and b) a real threat to RMB.

They can stall it.  They can try and control how people acquire it in lieu of their Yuan - but they can't stop it.  They might not even want to.  They just want to try and retain as much centralised control for as long as possible while they try and come up with a backup plan.  For all we know they're hard at work making cryptoyuan right now. Wink

Anyway, the point is that honey badgers eat politicos for breakfast.



Ah.
Though for what it's worth, I doubt many Chinese will send their $50,000 abroad, compared to those who use the exchanges now.



18. Post 6154798 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: dreamspark on April 10, 2014, 11:18:01 AM
It doesnt really maters - fud its or not - bitcoin is going down for more than 4 months. How naive one must be to believe, that in a month or two it will boom to 500-1k? I say bars will run it down to the button, trample reputation and any wish for old-buyers to invest again. And then media will step over it again. No good

Im sure the people who watched it go to $2 from $30 stay there for longer than 4 months and then to $266 would disagree with you but ehy you know best right?!

Thats would be the equivalent of going to about $80 now, you seriously trying to say were going to $80?

Stop it, you're turning fonzie on.



19. Post 6154909 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: SportsBet on April 10, 2014, 11:26:24 AM
a lot of useless troll discussion, not so much as to whats really going on and what we should expect.

="please do my thinking for me"

Provide an opinion for discussion, at least. Mine? $400 holding is optimistic, and we haven't seen the end of this until China is out of the picture (16th or 18th at the latest).



20. Post 6155733 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: Bagatell on April 10, 2014, 11:35:25 AM
we haven't seen the end of this until China is out of the picture (16th or 18th at the latest).

This is only the fourth or fifth time that the C word has caused panic in the playground. What makes you think it will be the last?

Agreed that 'over' is a relative term where China is concerned.
However, there is a difference between something that 'might happen', and even something that is 'going to happen', and something that 'has happened'.
-> It's possible to trade when your banking relationship is going to be cut off. It's a whole lot harder when it actually has been. That brings a certainty that isn't around now.
The catch will be if the Chinese government let the ban slide for a while with some banks/exchanges, prolonging the misery.



21. Post 6157722 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: 7thKingdom on April 10, 2014, 03:09:21 PM
It's time for another episode of everyone's favorite game... Test That Wall!

Yup. Very close to knocking on that wall now...



22. Post 6157778 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Vertigo anyone?



23. Post 6169436 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on April 11, 2014, 05:40:31 AM
did we see bottom?

I'm going to say yes, because of this.
http://finance.china.com.cn/news/special/boao2014/20140411/2327233.shtml

Is there anything in this we didn't already know? It's a little hard to tell through Google translate and Chinese circumlocution, but doesn't it just restate that bitcoin isn't banned, and nothing about how the exchanges will have their banking services withdrawn shortly?



24. Post 6169668 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on April 11, 2014, 09:19:58 AM
So the reason we went down 100's was fear of a potential China ban. Today we learn that China won't ban Bitcoin. What does everybody do? They sell.
Well done traders and sheep. Well done for being complete idiots.

Huh
What am I missing about the unbanning of a ban that never happened in the first place?



25. Post 6169788 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: TERA on April 11, 2014, 09:32:02 AM
So the reason we went down 100's was fear of a potential China ban. Today we learn that China won't ban Bitcoin. What does everybody do? They sell.
Well done traders and sheep. Well done for being complete idiots.

Huh
What am I missing about the unbanning of a ban that never happened in the first place?

Correct. This isn't really news and doesn't create any change. Bitcoin, in fact, was never banned in China. However, banks and third party payment processors WERE banned from dealing with bitcoin exchanges, and this has not changed. The bank accounts are still being shut down for violating this rule. What the news is saying is that, again, people are free to trade bitcoins and own bitcoins in China if they can find the means to do so.

Right. And yet people are putting the bounce back to $400 down to the 'China has unbanned bitcoin!! Woo!!!' effect...
-> no change.
Just thought I must be missing something, but sadly not.



26. Post 6169839 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: p0peji on April 11, 2014, 09:41:34 AM
Who else is going to short after the upcoming bulltrap?

Back down to... $360? $350?



27. Post 6170200 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

The fat lady has not yet sung. Sang. Whatever. Chinese exchanges are still open for business, people trading as long as they can.
-> I'm not making any assumptions until early next week.
And yes, I'm pretty sure the train was, like nail, irony.



28. Post 6200831 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 13, 2014, 05:02:35 PM
Today something dawned on me:

We can actually start seeing signs of "sellers' exhaustion" in volume and price action, but what is fascinating is that, different from the previous cycle, there is no sign yet of "buyers' appetite" re-appearing correspondingly.

Despair

Don't think so. "Apathy" is more like it, imo.

I think a lot of people are getting tired of the bullshit... and probably thinking that BTC prices should be more in line with the fundamentals.. in the $750-$850 arena.

$750 valuation based on what?



29. Post 6210510 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

If this is a bull trap, it's one heck of a bull trap.



30. Post 6227041 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: joburgtaxi on April 15, 2014, 08:50:38 AM
Anyone want to speculate on the effects to Bitcoin when this happens ?

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/apr/14/facebook-e-money-transfer-service-europe

We knew this was coming. Others will too (Google...?).
Not sure what I think. Bitcoin has a good headstart in terms of regulation, but Facebook has the bigger network and the clout to catch up fast.
Possibility of an integrated service or users combining them in some way?
Facebook is also centralised, which bitcoin is not.
Not an existential threat, anyway.



31. Post 6227579 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Jomppe on April 15, 2014, 09:27:39 AM
If I am not mistaken, this run will take Bitcoin all the way to 6500-7000 USD (based on how it rose last bull run from 60 to around 1200).
There might be some flashcrashes on the way but the major correction will come when the price is at the range of 6500-7000 USD.
I have been buying coins and even today I made a fiat transfer to Bitstamp so fresh cash is on the way. I still have significiant cash reserves to push the coin higher if it is necessary. Right now I do not recommend to short. The odds are that the price will go pretty high. Who am I to stop BTC running even towards 10 000 USD?

That is one heck of an assumption and the thinking that lies behind every speculative bubble in history.
I'm not going to put a ceiling price on bitcoin, but I won't make assumptions like that either!



32. Post 6227754 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 15, 2014, 09:39:29 AM
If I am not mistaken, this run will take Bitcoin all the way to 6500-7000 USD (based on how it rose last bull run from 60 to around 1200).
There might be some flashcrashes on the way but the major correction will come when the price is at the range of 6500-7000 USD.
I have been buying coins and even today I made a fiat transfer to Bitstamp so fresh cash is on the way. I still have significiant cash reserves to push the coin higher if it is necessary. Right now I do not recommend to short. The odds are that the price will go pretty high. Who am I to stop BTC running even towards 10 000 USD?

That is one heck of an assumption and the thinking that lies behind every speculative bubble in history.
I'm not going to put a ceiling price on bitcoin, but I won't make assumptions like that either!

yeah lol.... cant trust fools to buy when it's cheap..... and you cant trust them to stop buying when it's expensive! mania knows no ceilings.

The strangest/funniest thing is the change in sentiment from just 2 days ago. It's like a bipolar switch. Bam... and it's a bull market.



33. Post 6228079 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: TERA on April 15, 2014, 09:50:51 AM
If I am not mistaken, this run will take Bitcoin all the way to 6500-7000 USD (based on how it rose last bull run from 60 to around 1200).
There might be some flashcrashes on the way but the major correction will come when the price is at the range of 6500-7000 USD.
I have been buying coins and even today I made a fiat transfer to Bitstamp so fresh cash is on the way. I still have significiant cash reserves to push the coin higher if it is necessary. Right now I do not recommend to short. The odds are that the price will go pretty high. Who am I to stop BTC running even towards 10 000 USD?

That is one heck of an assumption and the thinking that lies behind every speculative bubble in history.
I'm not going to put a ceiling price on bitcoin, but I won't make assumptions like that either!

yeah lol.... cant trust fools to buy when it's cheap..... and you cant trust them to stop buying when it's expensive! mania knows no ceilings.

The strangest/funniest thing is the change in sentiment from just 2 days ago. It's like a bipolar switch. Bam... and it's a bull market.
It means most likely it's a bull trap, and people are all exuberant because they've taken their longs already.

I meant "Bam... and suddenly [people are assuming] it's a bull market."
I won't call it either way myself but wouldn't be surprised if there was a big pullback.



34. Post 6237304 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: Richy_T on April 15, 2014, 08:53:27 PM

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=blowing%20smoke%20up%20your%20ass
"Feeding someone's ego with constant adoration and commentary"

Are you actually familiar with urban dictionary? It is hardly authoritative.


FWIW, the actual origins are from a treatment for drowning. I don't think many people got saved that way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uEJbwGYaDs

I took my life in my hands when I clicked that link. Fortunately, I had seen the QI episode and thought it would probably go to this. Also, they didn't have movie cameras in the 19th century.



35. Post 6262779 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: mooncake on April 17, 2014, 09:30:12 AM
Has anyone already pointed out the obvious that the 18-04 deadline might be true?

Is it at 12 midnight?

My thoughts exactly. China fud isn't remotely over until 18th is over, and then only if pboc go through with it.



36. Post 6263008 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: windjc on April 17, 2014, 09:49:17 AM
Did the dumping start before the anouncement was made public?

Look, at this point these announcements dont matter. Traders are just using them as entry and exit points. I think most people who wanted to pull their funds off exchanges have already done so in China.

However, its the future difficulty of getting money into exchanges which is bearish.

Meanwhile, China traders who remain on exchanges remain as kamakazee as ever.

They matter because, right or wrong, traders do react to them!



37. Post 6267015 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: magicmexican on April 17, 2014, 01:39:55 PM
I think the funny thing is that a big chunk of sellers are selling because "sheeps are selling, price will go down, so i will short as well". So everyone thinks that everyone else is an idiot and they are the smart ones who are just taking advantage of them.

Keynsian beauty contest. Not just guessing how sheepy other people are, but how sheepy the sheep think other sheep are, ad infinitum.



38. Post 6351774 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 23, 2014, 02:57:56 AM
I was just hoping you could offer more comprehensive analysis. I won't ask again.

The whole story is right here.


Can you explain your thinking?
I think you can read the number of addresses on the blockchain different ways, but I'd like to know I understand what you mean before I question it!



39. Post 6352502 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 23, 2014, 10:04:32 AM

 Is there any evidence to the belief that expansions in the bitcoin ecosystem, services & economy actually increase the price..??
...
 So why in the WORLD is there this MYTH continuing about merchant adoption, growing ecosystem = higher price? Wtf? What am I missing..?

Welcome to the forum! Hope you've had the good first 6 days. Btw. the question is off-topic for this thread but let's not be picky.

Your question is discussed for example here.

Ok, though it's worth noting that a 'transaction' for bitcoin generally means something different than for PayPal/Mastercard etc - especially at this point.
For current figures, most bitcoin transactions aren't purchases, they're people moving coins to and from exchanges, between their own addresses, etc. Whereas I imagine almost every PayPal transaction is someone buying a Thing of some sort.
No doubt that will change, but the current figures aren't representative of use or adoption.



40. Post 6354285 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 23, 2014, 12:43:06 PM
just makes more coins go from unbelievers to believers

The cultists are finally coming out of the closet and openly admitting the cultist nature of bitcoin. That's not good marketing. I wonder, how long will it take until your manor will be called the temple.. Undecided
In the end, all of the bitcoins will be held by The True Believers. No question about that. It's questionable though, if those final True Believers are able to add much value to bitcoin. But who knows, even Scientology has amassed a large amount of wealth, and their ideology is even more ridiculous. But that's mainly because of clever marketing, and till now, the marketing for bitcoin hasn't been very clever.

Rpietila, hire me as an outside consultant, who is not an True Believer, but who knows exactly how the Unbelievers think. Let's make this cult big and powerful, and let me help you to be the beacon of light and the bringer of truth! Stop scrabbling for the mortgages and college funds of the regular folks, and let's switch to more potential targets, like the inexperienced youth who have inherited a large amount of wealth. Let's stop this meaningless fighting between us and let's join forces, so I can help you have eight late-teen wives and present yourself as an demigod!

Join me and we can rule the galaxy as father and son...



41. Post 6354386 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 23, 2014, 12:54:50 PM
Only if they hold BTC, if they convert straight to fiat as most do then it actaully creates downward pressure on the market.

No, even if they immediately exchange for another currency, it still creates a demand when people use BTC.  While that BTC is in the air, it can't be used for anything else.  The number of BTC-days consumed in the transaction is a reduction in money supply.


Time in the air is likely quite limited. Another factor would be the large number of people each holding a small amount of bitcoin to make purchases online or in other places it's convenient.



42. Post 6356088 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: oda.krell on April 23, 2014, 02:34:50 PM
The train is rocketing up right now.

The train has slowed down but it is still going up.

We're going up after this brief consolidation.

We're going up after a long consolidation.

We're going up after this small dip.

We're going up after a large dip.

Ok it's crashing but it's not going to go below the last support.

It's only going to go a little bit past the last support.


It could go anywhere but fundamentals will bring it back up eventually.

I'm convinced we'll see ~470 again pretty soon (38% fibo), and probably ~440 as well (50%).

What matters is how price will react to to those levels. Going through them with no support: March false breakout all over again. Putting up a fight: Maybe it's July 2013 after all.

This makes a lot of sense. The 'bottoms' that people have called so far have seemed far too bouncy for me. I don't know a great deal about TA and the way markets move, but shouldn't a capitulation be a bit more depressingly flat, rather than recovering 30% in a matter of hours/days?



43. Post 6371459 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: TERA on April 24, 2014, 12:20:46 PM
This day in Bitcoin price history:

April 24th, 2011 : 1BTC = $1.7
April 24th, 2012 : 1BTC = $5.10     (+300% from 2011)
April 24th, 2013 : 1BTC = $154.20  (+3024% from 2012, +9070% from 2011)
April 24th, 2014 : 1BTC = $485.00  (+314% from 2013, +9510% from 2012, +28529% from 2011)

Hey there hodler, that's a mighty big percentage you got there.

It looks overbought.

So, opinions on what merely 'bought' looks like at this point in bitcoin's history?



44. Post 6385018 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 25, 2014, 05:13:59 AM
too far too fast. I think a bounce up to 480 is possible and, by my eyes likely.

"HOLY CRAP CHINA HAS BANNED - oh no, wait a minute..."



45. Post 6385159 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: windjc on April 25, 2014, 05:34:48 AM
Stamp stopped giving a fuck

Europe is asleep.

I wish. My son woke up early and I'm dividing my time between getting some work done, these boards and the Night Garden. Honestly I'm not sure which is more surreal sometimes.



46. Post 6387027 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 25, 2014, 08:29:01 AM

Cash requires an in-person transaction with someone who has BTC.  This doesn't scale and risks those involved.  We need something else.


coinffeine.com

P2P-exchanges are coming online soon. After that, Bitcoin will be very hard to control by TPTB. I hope these kinds of panics will be history after that....maybe not Smiley

I am am looking forward to some of these decentralized type exchanges, too; however, I think that it will take a little while to get the bugs out of them.  Nonetheless, I look forward to thse kinds of developments that may resolve some of the stealing and  the manipulation and whatever else they are meant to solve.

They look awesome: true bitcoin-style solution to the problems of centralisation.
I can't quite work out how the bank transfers will actually happen without the third party. If it does work well, presumably the Chinese will flood in...



47. Post 6409327 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

This is a great spectator sport and could do with its own thread to keep track of - it will get lost in here over the next 30 days.
Since someone is highly likely to lose $50k under the terms of the bet, perhaps you could donate a paltry £1k to charity anyway, even if it's not a draw? I'm sure the winner would be gracious enough to accept $49k. I could suggest a few if you need ideas.
Kudos to you both for taking this on (assuming it goes ahead  Smiley )



48. Post 6418254 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: chessnut on April 27, 2014, 08:05:18 AM
I think extrapolation of the historical chart patterns is a stronger argument than extrapolation of risto's bets....

just launched my bet on bitbet.... $4000 before $400. should be approved tonight  Cheesy

Bold. Size of bet?
You consider ~1000% appreciation more likely than ~15% depreciation?



49. Post 6453813 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: TERA on April 29, 2014, 11:10:14 AM
Yep we're still following the  fractal:



You've said you're a current bear but long-term bull (I think). So where do you see the bottom?



50. Post 6454654 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: TERA on April 29, 2014, 11:26:51 AM
Yep we're still following the  fractal:

You've said you're a current bear but long-term bull (I think). So where do you see the bottom?
I don't really know actually. Bottom hunting is just too hard and all I do is play the MACDs week by week. I did notice that this 6 week cycle seems a little bit stronger than the last in that there is more volume and accumulation going on in the upper channel of the trend than there was last cycle. So the bottom might not be too far away. Maybe $250-$350. I don't think it will possibly go below $150 unless there is some catastrophic failure or U.S. ban, based on connecting the support from the 2011-2012 chart.  Of course all of this can be changed by major events. For example exchanges could open in New York.  

Worth being prepared for lower 300s/200s, at any rate, I'd think.



51. Post 6457401 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on April 29, 2014, 02:55:35 PM
@richy_t

https://nxtforum.org/lith-the-nxt-mmo/(ann)-lith/

https://nxtforum.org/nxt-browser-game/early-investment/

2 games with crypto as main in game currency and items in game can be bought and sold on asset exchange!

Those look really interesting! Possibilities on top of NXT are unlimited!  Shocked

Yes. Of all the alts, it seems that NXT actually offers something genuinely groundbreaking rather than tinkering around the edges of bitcoin.
I think they are also looking at integrating bitcoin payments via the NXT protocol, which would hopefully complement bitcoin rather than competing with it.



52. Post 6458836 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: aminorex on April 29, 2014, 04:17:27 PM
Yes. Of all the alts, it seems that NXT actually offers something genuinely groundbreaking rather than tinkering around the edges of bitcoin.

Just what is offered, in your view?  The community seems relatively robust, but PoS is substantially less secure that PoW.  The layered products will emerge in any coin that has traction, so I'm not sure layered features are a big plus. Anonymity is huge, in my estimation.  Much bigger than the little features that derive from layered applications of the blockchain.  A coin is neither required nor suitable for most of those.  Parasitic protocols are not viable in the long term.   Merge-mining fees is the correct way to use blockchains as infrastructure for layered apps, not cramming stuff into the core coin, but other ways of funding a distributed transaction db may be more efficient.

Anonymity on the other hand is part of the core, necessarily.  Part of the core implementation, and part of the core value proposition.  For that reason, of the alts, I like MRO.  BCN would have been interesting, but suffered from pre-mine.  MRO forks BCN and fixes that.  The upside is the best anonymity in a working coin, CPU-mined.  The downside is extreme immaturity of the software, no market yet:  It's roughly 2 weeks old.


Not familiar with MRO myself.
I do like the idea of forging rather than mining, though that has downsides, not least in distribution (though bitcoin suffers from that anyway). I think transparent forging could turn out to be quite significant too. And I do think designing something as a complete platform from the ground up will have advantages.



53. Post 6459859 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: KFR on April 29, 2014, 05:20:32 PM
Yes. Of all the alts, it seems that NXT actually offers something genuinely groundbreaking rather than tinkering around the edges of bitcoin.

Just what is offered, in your view?  The community seems relatively robust, but PoS is substantially less secure that PoW.  The layered products will emerge in any coin that has traction, so I'm not sure layered features are a big plus. Anonymity is huge, in my estimation.  Much bigger than the little features that derive from layered applications of the blockchain.  A coin is neither required nor suitable for most of those.  Parasitic protocols are not viable in the long term.   Merge-mining fees is the correct way to use blockchains as infrastructure for layered apps, not cramming stuff into the core coin, but other ways of funding a distributed transaction db may be more efficient.

Anonymity on the other hand is part of the core, necessarily.  Part of the core implementation, and part of the core value proposition.  For that reason, of the alts, I like MRO.  BCN would have been interesting, but suffered from pre-mine.  MRO forks BCN and fixes that.  The upside is the best anonymity in a working coin, CPU-mined.  The downside is extreme immaturity of the software, no market yet:  It's roughly 2 weeks old.


FWIW I concur.  I gave up on NXT quite a while back and started cpu mining MRO a few days ago.  Immature is right; but the potential...


For the anonymity alone?



54. Post 6460645 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: KFR on April 29, 2014, 06:24:25 PM
Yes. Of all the alts, it seems that NXT actually offers something genuinely groundbreaking rather than tinkering around the edges of bitcoin.

Just what is offered, in your view?  The community seems relatively robust, but PoS is substantially less secure that PoW.  The layered products will emerge in any coin that has traction, so I'm not sure layered features are a big plus. Anonymity is huge, in my estimation.  Much bigger than the little features that derive from layered applications of the blockchain.  A coin is neither required nor suitable for most of those.  Parasitic protocols are not viable in the long term.   Merge-mining fees is the correct way to use blockchains as infrastructure for layered apps, not cramming stuff into the core coin, but other ways of funding a distributed transaction db may be more efficient.

Anonymity on the other hand is part of the core, necessarily.  Part of the core implementation, and part of the core value proposition.  For that reason, of the alts, I like MRO.  BCN would have been interesting, but suffered from pre-mine.  MRO forks BCN and fixes that.  The upside is the best anonymity in a working coin, CPU-mined.  The downside is extreme immaturity of the software, no market yet:  It's roughly 2 weeks old.


FWIW I concur.  I gave up on NXT quite a while back and started cpu mining MRO a few days ago.  Immature is right; but the potential...


For the anonymity alone?

I think I feel more or less the same way Aminorex does.  If it is to be considered a serious goal for a coin then anonymity needs to be baked into the protocol design.  Layered features can be built on top of the core - I've had some experience with that side of development myself and am comfortable with the future that portends.  As for MRO specifically, I also like the GPU/ASIC resistance of the PoW scheme.  

Note that I'm not insisting anonymity is an essential feature for every coin - I just think it's a valid and desirable USP, which will inevitably drive growth and uptake of the coin that gets it right.  Personally, I'm quite happy with the pseudo-anonymity provided by conventional cryptocoin architectures.

I danced with NXT.  But the chemistry was all wrong. Wink


I figure there's room for lots of altcoins in the early stages - the ones that offer something worthwhile should survive. Most as far as I can tell don't offer much new at all, or one single change/improvement. A few years down the line I guess there might be only a handful that are used in any great measure. I assume and hope bitcoin will be one of these; Litecoin I guess will survive, as will Dogecoin (for different reasons). NXT I think has great potential, though how that pans out remains to be seen. I don't know enough about many of the others to make a judgement but I doubt there will be many others.
Out of interest, what didn't you like about NXT?



55. Post 6476265 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: hdbuck on April 30, 2014, 03:05:39 PM
pure example of why control and centralisation is useless and can be avoided with minimum harm:



http://www.tuxboard.com/photos/2014/04/pas-besoin-de-rond-point.gif

Blind luck? You can't really call a roundabout centralisation.
Not the best example of subsidiarity since I'm guessing quite a few people have ended up in hospital on that road. Just not in the ~20 frames of that gif.



56. Post 6476520 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: hdbuck on April 30, 2014, 03:38:27 PM
pure example of why control and centralisation is useless and can be avoided with minimum harm:



http://www.tuxboard.com/photos/2014/04/pas-besoin-de-rond-point.gif

Blind luck? You can't really call a roundabout centralisation.
Not the best example of subsidiarity since I'm guessing quite a few people have ended up in hospital on that road. Just not in the ~20 frames of that gif.

hmm i dont know, i mean, sure there must have been people ending up in hospital, but i dont think it outnumbered the people ending up in hospital in countries with road signals..
The point being adaptation. but yeah, im no expert, just trying to provide you folks with some cool illustrations Cheesy

Ok, it's a cool illustration.
Jeremy Clarkson suggests that if you fit every car's steering wheel with a spike, you will make the roads a lot safer overall because drivers will suddenly start caring a lot more about whether they're about to have an impact or not. So be careful - you might just end up making a point about personal responsibility by accident.



57. Post 6476923 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on April 30, 2014, 04:11:00 PM
any one seen this

https://coinreport.net/fincen-money-transmitters-bitcoin/

http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/rulings/pdf/FIN-2014-R007.pdf

Yup.
In the current climate, I'd say that falls more into the category of 'not bad news' rather than 'good news'.



58. Post 6492533 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 01, 2014, 02:35:10 PM
I bet the FBI sold their coins to the NSA

 Cheesy


it was silly of us to think we'd get a piece of the action...

That's if the Chinese government didn't offer them a better price.  Grin



59. Post 6520390 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on May 03, 2014, 08:27:24 AM
pumpy dumpy sat on a wall.

Or are we finally getting to the Last Big Dump before the bottom? Assuming it's going to happen (which I now do), it can't be much further away.



60. Post 6530162 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: byronbb on May 03, 2014, 08:11:27 PM
Oooh, looks like some new 'news' on the cards:
http://www.ibtimes.com/bitcoin-terrorist-threat-counterterrorism-program-names-virtual-currencies-area-interest-1579699

Rumour has it Saddam paid for his WMD's using bitcoin, won't somebody think of the children... Meanwhile paper dollars remain the No. 1 currency for criminals worldwide.

Earlier than I expected.

EDIT: Ah, they're only studying it. Good, good.

Now I will keep my funds on the European exchanges for sure.
Edit:
This news combined with the fact that Mastercard hired some lobbyist to create some anti-bitcoin awareness is really bad news.

No it isn't. It means people who run Mastercard are afraid of bitcoin and are confirming it's utility by attacking it.

Free advertising.

Some transactions are fast, low-cost and secure.
For everything else, there's MasterCard.



61. Post 6535753 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: TERA on May 04, 2014, 07:20:29 AM
This is clearly the pre-amble for the big rally to $5,000

Tera, has someone hacked your account?



62. Post 6539231 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: mooncake on May 04, 2014, 12:41:04 PM
It will not change just by the current people passing the bag on. The new cohort of 3.2x more people is what will take it higher.

The current players' desire to have cheaper coins is no more significant then.

For the new cohort to come in, there must be a motivation factor. And what might that be?

I suspect, though I don't know for sure (no doubt others will comment on this):
Lots of new people (aka the "Fresh Fiat" we keep hearing about) are going into bitcoin. We know that the number of new accounts on Coinbase, Blockchain etc is rising significantly, and that must be bringing some new money in.
The problem is that speculative money is leaving bitcoin at the same time. Bitcoin was vastly overpriced and has corrected/is correcting (depending on how bearish you are).
Although it's a gross simplification, I wonder whether the newcomers are more 'normal' buyers, Joe Publics who have heard about Bitcoin and decided to buy a small amount, try it out etc, before perhaps investing more in the future. Whereas the speculative money is at least an order of magnitude greater per person, because these people were trying to make a lot of money at it.
It may be that a proportion of current newcomers become larger investors later on. I'd be interested to know how many day traders here started small before going in heavy enough to make/lost decent money, and how long that took.

TL;DR - growth in user base and fiat is already there, it's just slower and steadier than the speculators running for the door.
-> Relax. Once the speculators have bailed properly ("capitulation") we'll see the underlying growth that was there all along.

Discuss.



63. Post 6542708 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: windjc on May 04, 2014, 05:20:49 PM
Guys, we look prime for a big dump on Houbi. The buy pressure keeps dwindling and the down trend has been re established for over a week now.  His market will most likely drift until news comes out this week. But I think we test 2555 and lower VERY soon.

Odd time for a dump, slap-bang in the middle of a 3-5 day holiday. Do you think they'll hold off dumping until Tuesday, or are you thinking it's more imminent than that?

No, I am just saying the chart is pretty much screaming that it is coming. We could even get a slight (2730-2780) bounce before it comes, imo.  Its soon Monday in China already.  I think in the next 72 hours there is going to be a big one.

The Big One? Final Dump and move on. Or is that too much to hope for? I just can't see this going on indefinitely.



64. Post 6545534 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: hdbuck on May 04, 2014, 08:09:26 PM
Guys, we look prime for a big dump on Houbi. The buy pressure keeps dwindling and the down trend has been re established for over a week now.  His market will most likely drift until news comes out this week. But I think we test 2555 and lower VERY soon.

Odd time for a dump, slap-bang in the middle of a 3-5 day holiday. Do you think they'll hold off dumping until Tuesday, or are you thinking it's more imminent than that?

No, I am just saying the chart is pretty much screaming that it is coming. We could even get a slight (2730-2780) bounce before it comes, imo.  Its soon Monday in China already.  I think in the next 72 hours there is going to be a big one.

The Big One? Final Dump and move on. Or is that too much to hope for? I just can't see this going on indefinitely.

6 months isnt indefinitely.. Grin

Ha! I mean, I don't see this going on more than a couple more weeks. British circumlocution.



65. Post 6562119 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: aminorex on May 05, 2014, 07:33:41 PM
The more and more fearful weeks are coming, non-stop, hahahahaha
Only 3 more weeks according to my best estimators.    For the next 6 months BTC should outperform.


Intriguing. Elaborate, if you will?
I know that this is off-topic, or at least off the topic that has been discussed for the last few pages, but all the same.



66. Post 6574017 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: aminorex on May 05, 2014, 10:22:56 PM
The more and more fearful weeks are coming, non-stop, hahahahaha
Only 3 more weeks according to my best estimators.    For the next 6 months BTC should outperform.
Elaborate, if you will?

In my day job, I construct systems which build predictive graphical models.  The best model I have for predicting XBTUSD right now puts the next bottom somewhere between 15 May and 30 May.  My best performing (F1) model of the broad US market (roughly, the Russell 2000) has a sequence of high mass concentrations at progressively lower price ranges in mid-June, early-August, and early-October.  Since there is no lower mass concentration on longer time frames, when intregrating over price points, these models indicate that BTC will outperform the market until Winter, when their mass diffuses.

(Picking this up from yesterday)
To clarify, your models suggest that:
1) BTC will bottom out in the period you have suggested (shortly after the China deadline, as it happens)
2) The US stock market is due for a downturn later this year (pointing to an economic downturn a few months later?)
3) Therefore Bitcoin 'outperforming' in this context could mean no growth at all, while the stock markets dip

What are your models' track records?



67. Post 6574928 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: dreamspark on May 06, 2014, 02:50:45 PM
So no serious answers then?

What is one good reason to have OKCoin on the foundation board if they are about to get shut down... There isn't one. And gox doesnt count, gox was on the board way before most the trouble and was also probably the only exchange to choose from in regards to having one on the board.

Quote
Shortly after OKCoin was founded, they received a $1,000,000 USD angel investment from VenturesLab and Silicon Valley Venture Capitalist Tim Draper. At the end of 2013, OKCoin closed a Series A round of funding led by Ceyuan Venture Capital, raising $10 million USD.

A clue there, I think.

Quote
OKCoin just released an English version of their website that opens up their top of the line services, such as P2P margin trading, to the international market.

Another clue.
-> OKCoin desperately looking for ways to stay in business. VCs desperately looking for ways to protect their investment.



68. Post 6575091 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: dreamspark on May 06, 2014, 02:57:40 PM
Yeah, I also overlooked the fact that to be a gold member you just have to pay.

All this is really saying is OKCoin gave us xxxBTC

Or Tim Draper paid it for them. The VCs will be just as keen that OKCoin doesn't go under.
That actually should be some consolation. They can't do much, but there is US money directly at stake and that means some big players outside of China will be wanting OKCoin to stay afloat.



69. Post 6578703 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: aminorex on May 06, 2014, 05:46:30 PM
To clarify, your models suggest that:
1) BTC will bottom out in the period you have suggested (shortly after the China deadline, as it happens)
2) The US stock market is due for a downturn later this year (pointing to an economic downturn a few months later?)
3) Therefore Bitcoin 'outperforming' in this context could mean no growth at all, while the stock markets dip

What are your models' track records?

Correct.  The broad market model gives me roughly an 12% edge on directional r2k futures positions over 1 month.  The BTC model is not mature enough to measure accurately.  The more parameters in your model, the more data you need to avoid overfit.  BTC doesn't have enough history to provide useful quality metrics on a scale more than a few hours, for models of this complexity.  I've tried to use some tricks to avoid overfit, but I can't yet quantify my success or failure in that regard, for the current model, with a usable p value.

Thanks. So another way of putting this might be:
"Not sure about bitcoin. By the way, recession in 12 months."



70. Post 6589817 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Oh, man this chart looks sick. http://coinmarketcap.com/xrp_180.html



71. Post 6589944 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: Shak on May 07, 2014, 10:29:56 AM
can you please stop quoting that ripple-fanboy here? many have him on ignore because they are tired to read his ramblings about premined scams

I am so sorry, I was just looking at market caps for cryptocurrencies and for some reason Ripple was there too.



72. Post 6597130 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: aliro38 on May 07, 2014, 05:50:12 PM
Last chance to buy EVER.
Why?

China is buying all the coins and never selling any of them. Bitcoin will go to the moon but no one will be able to buy them again.



73. Post 6598099 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

I wonder if a side effect of China's exchanges being hamstrung (at best) is that Chinese miners will stop mining because there's no easy way to sell their coins. That would lead to a drop in difficulty, benefiting miners elsewhere - though potentially placing further downward pressure on prices on the remaining exchanges.



74. Post 6599538 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on May 07, 2014, 08:15:10 PM
...History tells Holland always leads the way in Finance  Wink.

UR the tulip bulb guys, right?

Well maybe a little bit...
But credit where it's due. The Dutch founded exchange trading as we know it.



75. Post 6599747 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: xulescu on May 07, 2014, 08:21:57 PM
...History tells Holland always leads the way in Finance  Wink.

UR the tulip bulb guys, right?

Well maybe a little bit...
But credit where it's due. The Dutch founded exchange trading as we know it.

They traded the first derivatives too if I'm not mistaken?

I think you're right. So many good reasons to love the Dutch.



76. Post 6608590 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: rudrigorc2 on May 08, 2014, 08:08:04 AM
yes, huobi is above 2800 yens Wink

yens is japanese currency and reminds everyone about mtgox. chinese currency is called yuans.

slowly creeping TDM

One does not simply 'creep' TDM.



77. Post 6608638 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: TERA on May 08, 2014, 09:06:18 AM
Its like the sell function on Houbi has been turned off.

Thinks. This reminded me to check the Stoch RSI. I forgot about that nifty feature.


My biggest question is this: who is going to sell if they can no longer short? Are people actually still on the exchange that are going to want their money out in the form of fiat? I can see people leaving the exchanges by removing their bitcoin. But are people in China going to permanently leave bitcoin, sell and take their fiat away, who have not already done so?

And will new mined coins still go to the Chinese exchanges if its difficult to withdrawal?
You have to keep in mind that the vast majority of Chinese bitcoin traders are professional shadow currency traders and market makers - they are not bitcoiners. They do not want a long term investment - they want to find somewhere else where they can do their HFT, run their bots, and such.

This also implies that they won't be so concerned about operating on foreign exchanges. Presumably sending money abroad isn't such a big deal for professional traders as it would be for Zhao Public.
Do we have any evidence that Chinese money is moving to other exchanges?



78. Post 6628332 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: windjc on May 09, 2014, 08:35:35 AM


What the F*** does that mean?

Are you suggesting things are looking more bullish?

Or that TERA's bears are as good as gentlemand's spiders.  Wink

(gentlemand, I think your spider was wonderful and I'd definitely buy one for the asking price)



79. Post 6638756 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: windjc on May 09, 2014, 07:30:37 PM
So you never lost shit. You didn't even lose your computer. Yet, you came on the forum and announced that your bitcoin was stolen.

Now I try hard to minimize the risk to the well-being of anyone, and to raise the stakes in the game described as follows: if someone actually copied the private keys there (I had access to over 6000 bitcoins unencrypted, open in my computer browser windows during the time it was compromised), he will have to suffer the fact becoming public in its entirety + all the details, if he spends the bitcoins before I have the time to spend them myself. Due to extensive precautions involved, it will take me approximately a week of calendar time + several thousand dollars, to fully ensure that the bitcoins are safe, by sending them to uncompromised addresses. I plan to concentrate on that during this week.
(emphasis added)

Ok, idiot. Sorry for having so much long-suffering for you, ever since your infamous entrance to the forum a few months ago. Try to read and understand the bolded part and reason, what might have been the reason for the forum disclosure above in the midst of the action, without having the knowledge if keys were copied or not. HINT: it is in red.

Quote
You SHOULD try to please me. And the rest of us by being honest.

You are too stupid to be pleased. A fool and his bitcoins soon part. I just hope that you don't cause collateral damage to your loved ones in the process.

Ignored.

Is anyone reading this?  Is anyone reading Rpietila's responses to my simple questions?

So basically you are saying that your computer want not TOUCHED. Yet you came on to the forum to tell people that your coins were stolen (a lie) which you say that you did to neutralize any potential future threat - when you could have simply TRANSFERRED the coins to a new secure wallet. There - threat gone.

Why do you lie about this shit? We aren't idiots and you aren't lying about anything important. The only plausible reason you did this was so that you could get attention and maybe have an excuse to tell the world about your 6000 coins. Just like you decided to namedrop douchebag Justin Beiber's name for NO REASON.

Btw, I've been on this forum for almost a year. More lies. Id love to know the infamous entrance you are talking about. Of course, there was no infamous entrance. More lies.

What is it with you? Sometimes you provide good info and opinions. But when you are called out on bullshit you can't handle it. You literally spiral into more and more lies. You never admit that you are wrong or did anything wrong.

And you now, the stakes are higher now. Because you sunk 1 million euros into that hotel of yours. And hotels live and die based on one thing - REPUTATION. You need to get your house in order son, literally and figuratively.

Yup, reading it.
Something that should take the edge off your frustration: didn't you imply that you had a 1m NXT stake a couple of dozen pages back? (Or was that someone else?)



80. Post 6638912 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: windjc on May 09, 2014, 07:44:07 PM
So you never lost shit. You didn't even lose your computer. Yet, you came on the forum and announced that your bitcoin was stolen.

Now I try hard to minimize the risk to the well-being of anyone, and to raise the stakes in the game described as follows: if someone actually copied the private keys there (I had access to over 6000 bitcoins unencrypted, open in my computer browser windows during the time it was compromised), he will have to suffer the fact becoming public in its entirety + all the details, if he spends the bitcoins before I have the time to spend them myself. Due to extensive precautions involved, it will take me approximately a week of calendar time + several thousand dollars, to fully ensure that the bitcoins are safe, by sending them to uncompromised addresses. I plan to concentrate on that during this week.
(emphasis added)

Ok, idiot. Sorry for having so much long-suffering for you, ever since your infamous entrance to the forum a few months ago. Try to read and understand the bolded part and reason, what might have been the reason for the forum disclosure above in the midst of the action, without having the knowledge if keys were copied or not. HINT: it is in red.

Quote
You SHOULD try to please me. And the rest of us by being honest.

You are too stupid to be pleased. A fool and his bitcoins soon part. I just hope that you don't cause collateral damage to your loved ones in the process.

Ignored.

Is anyone reading this?  Is anyone reading Rpietila's responses to my simple questions?

So basically you are saying that your computer want not TOUCHED. Yet you came on to the forum to tell people that your coins were stolen (a lie) which you say that you did to neutralize any potential future threat - when you could have simply TRANSFERRED the coins to a new secure wallet. There - threat gone.

Why do you lie about this shit? We aren't idiots and you aren't lying about anything important. The only plausible reason you did this was so that you could get attention and maybe have an excuse to tell the world about your 6000 coins. Just like you decided to namedrop douchebag Justin Beiber's name for NO REASON.

Btw, I've been on this forum for almost a year. More lies. Id love to know the infamous entrance you are talking about. Of course, there was no infamous entrance. More lies.

What is it with you? Sometimes you provide good info and opinions. But when you are called out on bullshit you can't handle it. You literally spiral into more and more lies. You never admit that you are wrong or did anything wrong.

And you now, the stakes are higher now. Because you sunk 1 million euros into that hotel of yours. And hotels live and die based on one thing - REPUTATION. You need to get your house in order son, literally and figuratively.

Yup, reading it.
Something that should take the edge off your frustration: didn't you imply that you had a 1m NXT stake a couple of dozen pages back? (Or was that someone else?)

Yes. Why? Is it still going up today? Tongue

Little bit  Cool



81. Post 6670541 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.44h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 11, 2014, 01:50:37 PM
Let me reprhrase this then... Bitcoin bulls go one step further to tell you not only is Bitcoin risk-free but that if you aren't holding bitcoins, you are taking a risk because holding fiat is risky and bitcoin is clearly the way out of that risk. So bitcoin is not only risk free, but acts as an inverse risk. It is the infallible investment made in heaven and you you need to buy buy buy or die. They are not only going to quell your fears about holding bitcoin but make you fear NOT holding bitcoin. Because bitcoin is the solution for the apocalypse and when the system fails, bitcoiners will become filthy rich. It is the DESTINY. Bitcoin is like a rapture and you need to be on board or be left to perish.

Pretty much correct. Unlike most religions, however, you can choose to invest whichever portion of your assets you like, and trade the position in an out as you wish. This flexibility makes it difficult for traditional religions to compete.

I think it's called 'monotheism'.



82. Post 6670600 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.44h):

Quote from: TERA on May 11, 2014, 02:08:15 PM
I wish I could have a diversified portfolio of religions to make absolutely sure I wasn't going to hell.

Most will prefer you go 'all in', I'm afraid.



83. Post 6674930 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.44h):

Quote from: T.Stuart on May 11, 2014, 06:03:05 PM
"My religion is right and yours is wrong" is the leading cause of war and hate in the world.

Nonsense.

Quite.
People of different religions coexist quite happily in many circumstances - usually when there is a degree of prosperity. Religion is just a convenient peg to hang discontent on when there is deprivation. This is why any credible peacebuilding strategy must include economic regeneration and equality (Northern Ireland, South Africa, Israel/Palestine...). Saying that religion is the cause itself is akin to saying skin colour is the cause of war and hate.
You were bang on the money (pun intended) about the warnings against amassing wealth, though, which was the point I was gently trying to make with the comment about monotheism in the first place.



84. Post 6682941 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.44h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on May 11, 2014, 09:35:48 PM
"My religion is right and yours is wrong" is the leading cause of war and hate in the world.

Nonsense.

Quite.

Your debating skills are impeccable.



People of different religions coexist quite happily in many circumstances - usually when there is a degree of prosperity.

I'm surprised you bothered to type that weak statement. It's a half truth and doesn't address my point. I could just as easily say the opposite and be as impotently and vaguely semi-factual as you.

I said war and hate. War and hate. Just because 2 religions coexist doesn't mean they can't, one or both, pump out hatred and call it love. Like hating not only other religions but hating other DENOMINATIONS in the same fucking religion. Like fomenting hate for women, gays, blacks, (name your flavour). Like supporting human slavery. Like ordering the death of people who say naughty things or don't follow arbitrary rules. You know, hate.



Religion is just a convenient peg to hang discontent on when there is deprivation. This is why any credible peacebuilding strategy must include economic regeneration and equality (Northern Ireland, South Africa, Israel/Palestine...). Saying that religion is the cause itself is akin to saying skin colour is the cause of war and hate.

Or, religion does cause war and hate but it simply looks like a convenient peg to you. Your strawman efforts with regard to skin colour is ineffective and amateurish. I never said religion was "the" cause, and skin color *is* a cause for hate and war, like it or not.

Here's a recent war over skin color:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jul/06/mali-war-over-skin-colour

Religion is listed as 1st example of irrational causes of war:
"The Reasons for Wars – an Updated Survey"; 2009
Matthew O. Jackson: Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford,
California
www.stanford.edu/~jacksonm/war-overview.pdf

Religion was the cause for these wars:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_war

If it tickles your fancy, argue with me that religion isn't the 2nd biggest cause for war and hate beyond resources, as I stated, but trying to argue religion isn't a cause of war and hate only makes you look uneducated. Your deprivation argument doesn't hold up either so you may want to abandon it before I bring up the Holy Roman Empire or perhaps George Bush's Crusade. Oops...

I'm sorry, but your thinking isn't just woolly, it's dangerously lazy.
Jorge has made a few points about this (I'm in the awkward position of agreeing with him about something).
But quoting a Guardian article to support your case - when the article itself acknowledges the real problem is unfair distribution of resources and oppression?
That just makes you look bad.



85. Post 6690688 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.44h):

Quote from: T.Stuart on May 12, 2014, 04:05:11 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-2626208/GuestLeader-worlds-booking-engine-accept-bitcoins-payment-hotel-stays.html

This must be the Bitpay news. Guess some noob social network employee got over-excited.

"In its heyday, bitcoin’s value soared passed $1,100 (£650). But last month it was revealed that the currency’s price had plummeted."

"Revealed"? As in, "Displayed in real time by the exchanges"? Oh, Daily Mail...

In other news, anyone care to comment on this analysis? (Not mine)
http://bitscan.com/articles/btc-update-11-may-has-btc-formed-a-bottom.  

EDIT: include the full stop at the end in the link



86. Post 6690821 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.44h):

Quote from: T.Stuart on May 12, 2014, 04:15:28 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-2626208/GuestLeader-worlds-booking-engine-accept-bitcoins-payment-hotel-stays.html

This must be the Bitpay news. Guess some noob social network employee got over-excited.

"In its heyday, bitcoin’s value soared passed $1,100 (£650). But last month it was revealed that the currency’s price had plummeted."

"Revealed"? As in, "Displayed in real time by the exchanges"? Oh, Daily Mail...

In other news, anyone care to comment on this analysis? (Not mine)
http://bitscan.com/articles/btc-update-11-may-has-btc-formed-a-bottom


The link is not working.

No, weirdly the link includes a full stop at the end and it gets ignored by the forum software/browser.
Copy and paste "http://bitscan.com/articles/btc-update-11-may-has-btc-formed-a-bottom." and it seems to work fine.
Basically it suggests this is the bottom based on rising support dating back to late 2013.



87. Post 6740634 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.44h):

Quote from: windjc on May 15, 2014, 09:39:50 AM
This rocket can't go anywhere because there is no fiat to take it anywhere. But you guys can keep holding and watching this boring crap. Good luck with that.

Fiat is trickling, not flooding in. It's not a rocket, it's a Zimmer frame. But it might finally be heading in the right direction.



88. Post 6746067 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.44h):

Quote from: spooderman on May 15, 2014, 03:27:07 PM
gg bears. it FEELS like a bull market now. I know it's wrong to tarde with emotion, but what about hodl with emotion?

Maybe. Trading using other people's emotion is a different matter Smiley
And the mood around here definitely does seem to have changed in the last week. The expectation of a last crash to ~350 seems to have all but evaporated in most quarters.



89. Post 6767378 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on May 16, 2014, 05:50:48 PM
Bitcoin has a small risk of going to zero, perhaps 3% annualized. That is about the same as fiat cash, or stocks, so we are talking about a net zero risk.
GENIUS Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Wait that means statistically fiat has a 50% chance to go to zero every 23 years.

Yup. Did it 4 times in the 20th century, or didn't you notice?



90. Post 6798790 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: RandomPedestrianN9 on May 18, 2014, 12:04:37 PM
1718btc volume. good lord

Is that good or bad?

1556 now. It's unheard-ofly low in recent times (anyone care to dig up the last time?)
I guess a part of it is that more people are buying off-exchange. And a part is that people don't know what to do and whether up or down is next. And a part is probably that a lot of people have sold in disgust and walked away from bitcoin after getting burned.



91. Post 6816050 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: aminorex on May 19, 2014, 02:46:08 PM
  Cost of equipment: CEQ = 2000 USD/(GH/s) (modern equipment)
 
   [Source: @aminorex]

I think that's a typo or something, should be closer to 2000 USD/(TH/s) I believe.


Yeah I was sloppy and erred.  Thps it should be,  and the $ figure could well be obsolete as these prices change constantly and I haven't checked in a few weeks.

You also missed an apostrophe in your earlier post. Most unlike you; perhaps you are tired today.



92. Post 6817372 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: aminorex on May 19, 2014, 03:11:47 PM
You also missed an apostrophe in your earlier post. Most unlike you; perhaps you are tired today.


Heavy use of opiates past couple of weeks. Still recovering from damage taken. Thumb typing in bed.

Commiserations. Financial modelling is more hazardous than I had appreciated.



93. Post 6836473 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: Ultros on May 20, 2014, 03:17:22 PM
So, panic buying once $475 is broken?

I have the finger pointed on the red button personally. Jumping in @ 480.

Aaand...



94. Post 6838960 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: dreamspark on May 20, 2014, 05:35:15 PM
Yes be wary of LTC, it hasnt got much going for it anymore and one of the pools has also been flickering around 50% has rate for a few days as well.


Can you explain?
Never really saw the point in LTC, but what's different now?



95. Post 6839597 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on May 20, 2014, 06:05:03 PM
I was beginning to think that the one thing that could kill bitcoin would be boredom.

Good to see the patient still has a pulse Smiley

+1.  Smiley
You people need to look at the past and realize that congestions are always followed by large moves once the scale is tipped.
Not that hard, is it? Yet it always happens the same, because in humans, emotion drives reason and seldomly the other way around.

And of course, there are the "why did the price surge? any news? what happened? what about china?" cries. Because it couldn't be that price has a will of its own, as a manifestation of the consciousness of people around the world, and that there are some triggers that will incite movement. Nah, must be some NEWS.

Just wait. News will be found to fit the movement.



96. Post 6855068 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: Bagatell on May 21, 2014, 02:08:45 PM
People had very good arguments in decemeber why it would go down more so I wanted to see if anyone had the opposite argument for why it might go up.

Have you seen this?

Slippery Slope's Million Dollar Logistic Model

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=366214.0

I am rather sceptical about this. Not because it's a bad model overall, but because I suspect the amount of fiat coming in does not correlate well to adoption. Namely, over-represented speculators must have vastly over-pumped the market, so it's hard to tell where we 'should' be at this point.



97. Post 6855273 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: Bagatell on May 21, 2014, 02:35:32 PM
People had very good arguments in decemeber why it would go down more so I wanted to see if anyone had the opposite argument for why it might go up.

Have you seen this?

Slippery Slope's Million Dollar Logistic Model

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=366214.0

I am rather sceptical about this. Not because it's a bad model overall, but because I suspect the amount of fiat coming in does not correlate well to adoption. Namely, over-represented speculators must have vastly over-pumped the market, so it's hard to tell where we 'should' be at this point.

I'd be interested in seeing a better model, if there is one.

I don't have one (it's always easier to criticise someone else's than come up with your own work). I think it's a reasonable model. The catch is that adoption is ultimately about getting Joe Public on board. Right now, most of the people who own bitcoins are hodlers or speculators. My guess is that both of those categories will own a lot more bitcoins at any given time than JP who wants to buy stuff with them. What multiple more might give a clue as to how ahead of ourselves we are at the moment. It's hard to estimate, though: how much do you think the average person will keep in bitcoin on full adoption?



98. Post 6858631 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: aminorex on May 21, 2014, 05:17:51 PM
I am rather sceptical about this. Not because it's a bad model overall, but because I suspect the amount of fiat coming in does not correlate well to adoption. Namely, over-represented speculators must have vastly over-pumped the market, so it's hard to tell where we 'should' be at this point.

PQ=MV, M=k*n^2, n~r*exp(t)+f

Cheapness is near historical maxima.  That's all you really need to know, if you think BTC is technically and politically evolvable to serve as, e.g. SDRs, with probability > 0.001%.

I had intended to be levering up about now, but in the event I decided to keep it down to about 80%, so that I can short stock markets (and bull-ride the faster-cycling bubble waves on MRO, with the small amount suited to its embryonic liquidity state) while we wait for the party to start rocking.  At the dogleg I will lever up, if I'm functioning.  Less than 80% sacrifices too much, takes too much risk, for my present taste.


I've no doubt that impressive growth is possible. But I'm slightly cautious of equating speculators' with regular punters' money. It could easily be an order of magnitude bigger.
But there's no arguing with people who use that kind of language.
(Perhaps you could clarify the terms - I assume M = market cap, n = number of adopters, k is your constant?)




99. Post 6859376 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: rezurect on May 21, 2014, 06:36:30 PM
http://advivo.com.br/blog/jorge-stolfi/cuidado-com-bitcoin

Huh

Meh. Not impressed.



100. Post 6859828 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: aminorex on May 21, 2014, 06:52:08 PM
I've no doubt that impressive growth is possible. But I'm slightly cautious of equating speculators' with regular punters' money. It could easily be an order of magnitude bigger.
But there's no arguing with people who use that kind of language.
(Perhaps you could clarify the terms - I assume M = market cap, n = number of adopters, k is your constant?)

Yes.

BTC speculation to date has been limited to the extreme margins of motivated, informed speculators with massive risk tolerance and a visionary posture.  That's a pretty rarefied atmosphere.  Historically, the major enabling factors for expansion have been expansions in the carrying capacity of the channel for fiat inflows.  I take it as a given that one or more major capital markets will offer a public liquidity vehicle for custodial BTC in the next 6 to 12 months, so I think it's pretty safe to say that 18 months would be an extreme upper bound for the next bubble onset, which is likely to be a doozy -- a word which historically referred to the Deusenberg motorcar.

I have said these things many times, as have many others, I am sure, but when someone expresses a perplexity, and these points seem helpful to provide an accurate form of clarity, I will supply a reminder.  Accurate conviction on points of minority knowledge is a wonderful thing.  Since I am fully charged for the time-being, I have every reason to propagate this boon where possible.  You can bin me with the uberbulls a la Risto.  I don't mind at all.


Woo, hold up there. Absolutely no disrespect intended, or even real disagreement (though I can't put you in the same category as Risto). Dangers of non-verbal communication and British irony, I suspect.
Appreciation on greater adoption is a given. My one misgiving in quantifying it is the amounts of money that are already in vs what might come in. But I suspect it's the difference between one order of magnitude's upside and the next.

 



101. Post 6872929 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

In other news, Ripple is taking a thorough spanking and Darkcoin is going stellar (again).
Anyone know what's happening there?



102. Post 6873070 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: hdbuck on May 22, 2014, 12:30:26 PM
In other news, Ripple is taking a thorough spanking and Darkcoin is going stellar (again).
Anyone know what's happening there?

Jed Mcalebd unleashing hell on ripple (selling 9Bn XRP)
https://xrptalk.org/topic/2629-selling-my-xrp/

darkcoin: regular pump before it eventually fades into the abyssal alts graveyard.

 Grin

Oda: various 'gateways', including Stamp and other exchanges. Don't know much about it myself.



103. Post 6874565 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: magicmexican on May 22, 2014, 02:03:21 PM
should i dump my ripples?

Why have you been holding those in the first place?

Had some credited to my acc via promotion or something, never figured out how to sell them

Stamp is an easy way to dump them.



104. Post 6874802 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

I believe Aminorex's arguments (if I'm not misrepresenting them) are partially based on the inevitability of new streams of fiat being made available that are orders of magnitude greater than the current ones. That can only have one effect. It's not a question of technical or fundamental analysis in that regard.



105. Post 6875000 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 22, 2014, 02:26:24 PM
I believe Aminorex's arguments (if I'm not misrepresenting them) are partially based on the inevitability of new streams of fiat being made available that are orders of magnitude greater than the current ones. That can only have one effect. It's not a question of technical or fundamental analysis in that regard.
One cannot compute a p value for that "inevitability".  He must be using linear regression analysis on the log price since back then, correct?

Or... you could read the news?



106. Post 6875890 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 22, 2014, 02:49:46 PM
Most of the large moves in the past year had very obvious and plausible explanations.  The closing of SilkRoad, the opening of the Chinese market, the Chinese decrees and workarounds, the MtGOX "bug" announement, the Caixin leak and the workarounds, etc.. 
Please tell me how it was obvious the price would almost half and then bounce straight back after silk road got shut down?

Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
Indeed, and that is the problem:  many external factors are sudden and unpredictable, and the magnitude of their effect is largely unpredictable as weel.  But, in retrospect ,the causal connections are very clear. 

One cannot predict, from price analysis or any other way, whether and when there will be further moves against bitcoin by the Chinese government.  One can say however that if that happens then the price will probably fall by tens or dollars or more, depending on the severity of the move.  And if the PBoC reverses its policy about banks x exchanges, then the price may shoot up by hundreds of dollars.  On the other hand one can predict that if another store chain accepts bitcoin through BitPay, then the price will hardly twitch.

Since the last rally was due to the opening of the Chinese market, another rally to 10'000$ would require opening another market even bigger than the Chinese one.  Perhaps some big regulatory change would attract big investors in the US or Europe; but who can predict that?

It is not rational to expect that new markets will continue to open at regular intervals, each 10x bigger than the previous one, just because there were three such events before with roughly similar spacing. 


Sure. That's a bit of a straw man, though.
Very few people know about bitcoin and few of those own any. Few of those own any real quantity.
The rest is just supply and demand.
For what it's worth, every article you publish brings bitcoin to greater public awareness.



107. Post 6876017 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: FNG on May 22, 2014, 03:24:48 PM

Indeed, and that is the problem:  many external factors are sudden and unpredictable, and the magnitude of their effect is largely unpredictable as weel.  But, in retrospect ,the causal connections are very clear.  

One cannot predict, from price analysis or any other way, whether and when there will be further moves against bitcoin by the Chinese government.  One can say however that if that happens then the price will probably fall by tens or dollars or more, depending on the severity of the move.  And if the PBoC reverses its policy about banks x exchanges, then the price may shoot up by hundreds of dollars.  On the other hand one can predict that if another store chain accepts bitcoin through BitPay, then the price will hardly twitch.

Since the last rally was due to the opening of the Chinese market, another rally to 10'000$ would require opening another market even bigger than the Chinese one.  Perhaps some big regulatory change would attract big investors in the US or Europe; but who can predict that?

It is not rational to expect that new markets will continue to open at regular intervals, each 10x bigger than the previous one, just because there were three such events before with roughly similar spacing.


Your whole argument fails here. BTCChina was established in 2011 after the $32 bubble. Bitcoin has been opening to Chinese since that was only $2
heh..he believes markets are entirely saturated already.  lol

Compare the marketcap to single companies, single individuals..it's laughable.

Maybe he needs to read what Marc Andreessen wrote about it today

Link?



108. Post 6888781 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: blatchcorn on May 23, 2014, 06:47:29 AM
Where is TERA amid this froth?  

Yup. Good question.
She's gone quiet from the moment we went up.
Considering she lives in a fantasy world she probably just couldn't believe we went up and refused to buy back in as her buy orders at 280 weren't filled and now she finally woke up realizing she has a big problem.
It's quite hilarious how she has dissapeared since.

Don't worry. She is just calibrating her graphs.
TERA here is a graph for you:


Bull trap.



109. Post 6889302 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on May 23, 2014, 07:30:15 AM
That was the most important breakout moment and it was completely broken.
The shape of this rise is very different than the pump and dump bull traps that we had all throughout this bear market.
Obvious trend reversal is obvious.


You say bull trap.

Seems legit.


lol

I'm sorry, I should have been clearer when I said 'Bull trap'. What I meant was:
<humour>
Bull trap.
</humour>
I just figured the context made it as obvious as the trend reversal.



110. Post 6892554 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: solex on May 23, 2014, 11:57:30 AM
I am still holding my ripples, i think huge pump is just around the corner..

It needs more than just a pump, much much more, ... like 17 million volts in the neck of that Frankenstein's corpse.


I'm sorry, I know this is puerile, but I always genuinely misread "ripples". r and n look so similar.



111. Post 6911863 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: latoxine on May 24, 2014, 01:06:44 PM

lol yes that's what I mean, mistake...

Sorry, removed previous comment as the formatting was all messed up.
Don't know, sorry!
If you still want some ideas for enjoying the bank holiday weekend I can make a few suggestions.



112. Post 6917299 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 24, 2014, 07:30:31 PM


Whales making walls, whales breaking walls. I'm out of words!

You think these are whales??  Cheesy
Remember, remember, the 25th of.. June. >BTC90,000 traded in <4 hours.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.19200

Price was much lower then, so raw coin value will maybe never be this high again.

Still, we're seeing 10k coin volume on a good day right now, but in early '14 we saw 70k on the highest volume day. I'd like to  see that kind of volume again eventually.

Stamp?
More exchanges and people buy off-exchange now. So what's a new healthy volume?



113. Post 6918026 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: Essex343 on May 24, 2014, 07:55:20 PM


Whales making walls, whales breaking walls. I'm out of words!

You think these are whales??  Cheesy
Remember, remember, the 25th of.. June. >BTC90,000 traded in <4 hours.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.19200

Price was much lower then, so raw coin value will maybe never be this high again.

Still, we're seeing 10k coin volume on a good day right now, but in early '14 we saw 70k on the highest volume day. I'd like to  see that kind of volume again eventually.

Stamp?
More exchanges and people buy off-exchange now. So what's a new healthy volume?

people keep saying this, but how do you know? besides say, secondmarket, isn't it all anecdotal? why is everyone so sure that so much is being bought/sold off the exchanges? i am just not sure i believe it.

Anecdotal (but reliable) evidence of people buying off-exchange. Like people who know funds that have contracts with miners.
For proof of more exchanges than there used to be (1: Gox), see all the new exchanges. (Not just fiat, either - remember a small proportion of bitcoin is going into alts.)



114. Post 6925034 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.46h):

Quote from: MahaRamana on May 25, 2014, 07:41:06 AM


Oh, igorr. Cry



115. Post 6944865 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Litecoin seems to be firmly uncoupled from bitcoin now (if that's not an oxymoron). Doge also falling. Dark days ahead for both?



116. Post 6945013 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: Todorius on May 26, 2014, 08:59:02 AM
Litecoin seems to be firmly uncoupled from bitcoin now (if that's not an oxymoron). Doge also falling. Dark days ahead for both?

It was the same in the last BTC runup. First, LTC was falling and falling, LTC doomsday prophecies were filling the air.
"LTC is dead!!!" and so on. Then, the LTC/BTC ratio suddenly jumped from 0.0075 to 0.05 in a matter of 1 week !!!
Same with many of the other alts.

I would never call the end of some alt too early, those little suckers are full of nasty surprises!  Grin

This is a fair point.
However, I do wonder whether the remainder of this year will see the alts better sieved for those that have some kind of value. If bitcoin is bubbling again then I guess a lot of money might come out of the alts for a 'sure thing' propped up by better public visibility.
Privacy seems to be a big deal. NXT's platform I think has got a bright future. What has Litecoin got to offer any more? Is there a reason that DRK shouldn't overtake it, for example?



117. Post 6945044 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: windjc on May 26, 2014, 09:03:40 AM
Litecoin seems to be firmly uncoupled from bitcoin now (if that's not an oxymoron). Doge also falling. Dark days ahead for both?

Do you not remember way way way way way way back 6 months ago, back when it was the year 2013, long long ago, when LTC was .007 btc? 1/3 of what it is now?

Probably not, that was a long time ago.

Sorry, not sure I follow your point. It's been uncoupled before and survived/caught up just fine, so the same could happen again?
Another fair point, though the landscape is VERY different now.



118. Post 6945204 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: windjc on May 26, 2014, 09:10:57 AM
Litecoin seems to be firmly uncoupled from bitcoin now (if that's not an oxymoron). Doge also falling. Dark days ahead for both?

It was the same in the last BTC runup. First, LTC was falling and falling, LTC doomsday prophecies were filling the air.
"LTC is dead!!!" and so on. Then, the LTC/BTC ratio suddenly jumped from 0.0075 to 0.05 in a matter of 1 week !!!
Same with many of the other alts.

I would never call the end of some alt too early, those little suckers are full of nasty surprises!  Grin

This is a fair point.
However, I do wonder whether the remainder of this year will see the alts better sieved for those that have some kind of value. If bitcoin is bubbling again then I guess a lot of money might come out of the alts for a 'sure thing' propped up by better public visibility.
Privacy seems to be a big deal. NXT's platform I think has got a bright future. What has Litecoin got to offer any more? Is there a reason that DRK shouldn't overtake it, for example?

Oh god, enough with this DRK crap for goodness sakes. Yes, there are dozens of reasons DRK will not overtake LTC.

LTC is a behemoth, with massive dispersement of coins and investors and hash power. LTC is ALSO a medium of exchange between other alts.

When DRK becomes the go to 2nd alt for exchange on BTC-E and Finex and Stamp, then maybe you can start this conversation. For now, though, DRK needs to be worried about MRO and Emunie, which have the potential to stomp a big ol hole its in DRKs head and send it down the road of every other pumped coin.

Perhaps DRK was a bad example. My general point was about why LTC is more attractive than the alternatives - which you answer above. Still, I'm not as optimistic about LTC as you are. Would new money go into LTC in sufficient quantities to allow it to keep up? In the short term, yes. Long run, not convinced.



119. Post 6945360 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: YipYip on May 26, 2014, 09:25:02 AM
Litecoin seems to be firmly uncoupled from bitcoin now (if that's not an oxymoron). Doge also falling. Dark days ahead for both?

Do you not remember way way way way way way back 6 months ago, back when it was the year 2013, long long ago, when LTC was .007 btc? 1/3 of what it is now?

Probably not, that was a long time ago.

Sorry, not sure I follow your point. It's been uncoupled before and survived/caught up just fine, so the same could happen again?
Another fair point, though the landscape is VERY different now.

Darkcoin will never get the mainstream adoption of BTC/LTC

this is all about new coin vitality that you are enjoying now ...if and when it comes on teh radar of any government/political/banking sector it will be firmly stomped on teh head

Enjoy your kiddie fanatsy of smoking cigarettes down the back of the bus Darkcoin coolness... i.e creating a coin that by design is made to launder money & buy drugs is really going to go down well with society & the infrastructural systems that you will need to connect with

Also welcome to teh world of anybody who has/uses DRK are now targets for law enforcement types

DARKCOINS future look really bright to me ...lolz

Never owned a single DRK, never plan to. It was an example - an apt one, given that it currently has #3 market cap.



120. Post 6945508 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: windjc on May 26, 2014, 09:37:31 AM
Litecoin seems to be firmly uncoupled from bitcoin now (if that's not an oxymoron). Doge also falling. Dark days ahead for both?

Do you not remember way way way way way way back 6 months ago, back when it was the year 2013, long long ago, when LTC was .007 btc? 1/3 of what it is now?

Probably not, that was a long time ago.

Sorry, not sure I follow your point. It's been uncoupled before and survived/caught up just fine, so the same could happen again?
Another fair point, though the landscape is VERY different now.

Darkcoin will never get the mainstream adoption of BTC/LTC

this is all about new coin vitality that you are enjoying now ...if and when it comes on teh radar of any government/political/banking sector it will be firmly stomped on teh head

Enjoy your kiddie fanatsy of smoking cigarettes down the back of the bus Darkcoin coolness... i.e creating a coin that by design is made to launder money & buy drugs is really going to go down well with society & the infrastructural systems that you will need to connect with

Also welcome to teh world of anybody who has/uses DRK are now targets for law enforcement types

DARKCOINS future look really bright to me ...lolz

Never owned a single DRK, never plan to. It was an example - an apt one, given that it currently has #3 market cap.

Agreed, DRK is just another regular hype.

What makes a coin succeed is the infrastructure surrounding it.
Even though privacy may be a factor, no one actually uses darkcoin, or will use it.
Merchants aren't going to accept darkcoin. Litecoin on the other hand, though it may not be technologically different from bitcoin, has a huge
network and infrastructure compared to the other alts.

LTC will be still number 2 when Darkcoin is rotting in the altcoin graveyard where all the other so-called LTC successors are rotting now, Auroracoin, etc.

I predict that LTC, together with the older, more establshed alts, will see a huge price surge in this bubble, BTC-ratio wise.
The older, the more established a coin, the better. Network and infrastructure are the key words here imho.

I agree. Although I also think any coin that can be traded for fiat directly will have a way to survive outside of Bitcoin. NXT for example will have this soon.



I'm happy to stand corrected on this one. (I know, standard procedure is to disappear for a while when a good point is made, sorry.)
Very pleased about NXT getting a fiat exchange soon. I'm more invested there, in both senses, than anything else. I recently sold what few LTC I had for NXT for that reason.



121. Post 6945667 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: windjc on May 26, 2014, 09:46:54 AM
Litecoin seems to be firmly uncoupled from bitcoin now (if that's not an oxymoron). Doge also falling. Dark days ahead for both?

Do you not remember way way way way way way back 6 months ago, back when it was the year 2013, long long ago, when LTC was .007 btc? 1/3 of what it is now?

Probably not, that was a long time ago.

Sorry, not sure I follow your point. It's been uncoupled before and survived/caught up just fine, so the same could happen again?
Another fair point, though the landscape is VERY different now.

Darkcoin will never get the mainstream adoption of BTC/LTC

this is all about new coin vitality that you are enjoying now ...if and when it comes on teh radar of any government/political/banking sector it will be firmly stomped on teh head

Enjoy your kiddie fanatsy of smoking cigarettes down the back of the bus Darkcoin coolness... i.e creating a coin that by design is made to launder money & buy drugs is really going to go down well with society & the infrastructural systems that you will need to connect with

Also welcome to teh world of anybody who has/uses DRK are now targets for law enforcement types

DARKCOINS future look really bright to me ...lolz

Never owned a single DRK, never plan to. It was an example - an apt one, given that it currently has #3 market cap.

Agreed, DRK is just another regular hype.

What makes a coin succeed is the infrastructure surrounding it.
Even though privacy may be a factor, no one actually uses darkcoin, or will use it.
Merchants aren't going to accept darkcoin. Litecoin on the other hand, though it may not be technologically different from bitcoin, has a huge
network and infrastructure compared to the other alts.

LTC will be still number 2 when Darkcoin is rotting in the altcoin graveyard where all the other so-called LTC successors are rotting now, Auroracoin, etc.

I predict that LTC, together with the older, more establshed alts, will see a huge price surge in this bubble, BTC-ratio wise.
The older, the more established a coin, the better. Network and infrastructure are the key words here imho.

I agree. Although I also think any coin that can be traded for fiat directly will have a way to survive outside of Bitcoin. NXT for example will have this soon.



I'm happy to stand corrected on this one. (I know, standard procedure is to disappear for a while when a good point is made, sorry.)
Very pleased about NXT getting a fiat exchange soon. I'm more invested there, in both senses, than anything else. I recently sold what few LTC I had for NXT for that reason.

NXT, more than any other coin and ecosystem has already decoupled from Bitcoin.

NXT price is hindered by the lack of exposure - the inability to implement its code into large exchanges like Mintpay due to the fact that its not a bitcoin clone. This has caused the dissemination of coins to be slowed down and a price "cap" to be forced on the coin for a long time now.

However, it has no less than 100 different development projects in the works, more than any other coin besides BTC.

NXT is a long term play, imo.  It might be at around the same price it is today (in BTC terms) 6 months from now. But when it "pops" it has the potential to pop big and have that pop be sustained.

Its definitely the lead dog in the 2.0 world. For now at least.

This is pretty much how I see it. But it's worth noting that it is being badly held back and it's already #5. A lot of good devs, great community, a lot of promise. And not exactly a competitor to bitcoin, either, which could help a lot.
Fiat exchange should improve exposure. Multigateway too.



122. Post 6945991 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

@Jorge
I'm curious. You're an academic, and a scientist, I believe. So any theory you hold must be falsifiable in order to be viewed as credible.
Under what criteria would you entertain the idea that you might be wrong about bitcoin, or cryptocurrency in general?



123. Post 6946207 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 26, 2014, 10:31:45 AM
@Jorge
I'm curious. You're an academic, and a scientist, I believe. So any theory you hold must be falsifiable in order to be viewed as credible.
Under what criteria would you entertain the idea that you might be wrong about bitcoin, or cryptocurrency in general?
I answered this some 6,223,678,221 pages ago on this thread.  "Success" will be when bitcoin (or crypto) gets used by a large number of people because it is cheaper/faster/safer/easier/whatever than the alternatives.  Not because one has a BTC stash to burn, not to support the cause, not to evade taxes or make illegal payments, not because it is hip, not to speculate with, not out of curiosity, etc.

Offline key/address generation and asymmetric crypto-signing of "digital checks" are undeniable wins that I am sure will be widely adopted eventually.  As for the rest of the bitcoin protocol, and the Satoshi blockchain in particular, I am more skeptical than ever.


I must have missed that. I was probably distracted by a picture of a train at the time.
Define "large number of people".



124. Post 6946444 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 26, 2014, 10:48:23 AM
Define "large number of people".
If it is clearly stable and long term, even a few tens of thousands of legitimate users can be counted as success, I guess.  But note that there must be enough payment volume to support the miners through fees, once block reward dwindles.

And in the interests of making it a fair experiment, do you ever worry that your posts/articles might prevent that limited adoption happening (which would seem very unscientific)? And if not, what is the purpose of making them?
Finally, do you have a hat that you would be prepared to eat in the event that your threshold for adoption is met?



125. Post 6946929 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 26, 2014, 11:22:41 AM
And in the interests of making it a fair experiment, do you ever worry that your posts/articles might prevent that limited adoption happening (which would seem very unscientific)? And if not, what is the purpose of making them?
I doubt that this thread has more than 1000 readers.  If having one skeptical poster here can prevent the success of bitcoin, then you should all dump your coins and get out of this losing game, as fast as you can.

Independently of its probability of success as defined above, bitcoin may be a fun gambling game, but is a terrible investment, because there is no reliable way to estimate its future value.  Unfortunately some sleazy salesmen are touting bitcoin to unwary people as a good investment, even as a hedge against the 1%/yr inflation of the dollar or the 6-7%/yr inflation of Brazil.  (Even with the recent spurt, Bitcoin's annualized inflation rate since january has been ~100%/yr.)  We see plenty of examples right here.  (Sure, if one had a time machine and could invest in September 2013, the return would be fantastic; but, with that tool, playing the roulette at Las Vegas would be even better.)  Thus if you want to help someone, tell him/her NOT to invest in bitcoin.

You're not just posting in this thread. You've written articles about bitcoin and you're advising your students not to go near it.
I don't think that's going to have a serious effect on bitcoin's long-term adoption prospects, either. It may even be beneficial.
I'm just not entirely sure you know why you spend so much time here.



126. Post 6949507 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: igorr on May 26, 2014, 02:10:27 PM
LOL,
http://www.coindesk.com/bot-named-willy-did-mt-goxs-automated-trading-pump-bitcoin-price/
http://willyreport.wordpress.com/

After willy,  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ob9Ak1t09Ao

I remember why I ignorred you.
This was discussed a while back on this thread. The consensus was, 'Meh'.



127. Post 6950901 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: aminorex on May 26, 2014, 03:17:01 PM
Litecoin seems to be firmly uncoupled from bitcoin now (if that's not an oxymoron). Doge also falling. Dark days ahead for both?

It was the same in the last BTC runup. First, LTC was falling and falling, LTC doomsday prophecies were filling the air.
"LTC is dead!!!" and so on. Then, the LTC/BTC ratio suddenly jumped from 0.0075 to 0.05 in a matter of 1 week !!!
Same with many of the other alts.

I would never call the end of some alt too early, those little suckers are full of nasty surprises!  Grin

Once upon a time, the majority of crypto investors had not experienced the burning side of a p&d.  Not true now.  Today, to have staying power, at a leading tier marketcap, a coin has to have compelling features.  LTC does not.  I expect DRK to fail on its snake-oil promises, eventually, but I expect it to outperform LTC by a nautical mile for a long while, perhaps forever.

Yes, LTC has historically lagged BTC and overshot its spikes.  I expect most of that positive beta will be embodied by other alts with better distinctives this time.  NXT and MRO are obvious candidates (leaving DRK aside for the moment).


A couple of weeks back you were more skeptical about NXT. What changed your mind, if indeed it has changed?



128. Post 6955373 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: magicmexican on May 26, 2014, 06:27:41 PM
Very unexpected turn of events @DRK coin

Literally no one saw that coming.



129. Post 6965072 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: blatchcorn on May 27, 2014, 07:27:47 AM
Interesting discussion as I really should sell some bitcoin right now as my only source of income is the consulting work I do for which I get paid in bitcoin.

Should I hold-off selling even if I really could do with more fiat?  

I'm in the same boat getting paid some btc for copywriting. When we were in a downtrend it made sense to save a little and send the rest straight through to Stamp to cash out.
Now, it grates to sell in an uptrend. I guess it's simple: hold on for as long as possible, sell what you need to and save the appreciating difference. That's my plan, anyway.



130. Post 6965625 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

540 retest required?



131. Post 6965747 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on May 27, 2014, 08:23:09 AM
540 retest required?

Required for what?

Going up. Conventional TA I think.



132. Post 6965821 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: podyx on May 27, 2014, 08:34:32 AM
I don't think we're going lower then this tbh

headed to 630 in a couple days

540 retest was question for discussion. Thoughts for/against?



133. Post 6971155 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 27, 2014, 02:33:35 PM
From bitstamp FB:

Quote
Bitstamp BTC Proof of Reserves, May 2014
Dear Bitstamp clients,
To reassure clients, Bitstamp regularly performs a procedure to prove its BTC reserves.
On May 24th, 2014, Mike Hearn of Vinumeris GmbH, bitcoin core developer and prominent member of bitcoin community observed Bitstamps proof of reserves procedure. Reserves were proven by conducting a Bitcoin send-to-self transfer.
Details of the procedure are provided in the PDF linked here:
https://www.bitstamp.net/s/documents/Bitstamp_proof_of_reserves_statement.pdf
In summary, Bitstamp held 183,497 BTC its cold wallet fully covering both the clients funds held at Bitstamp and the clients funds on the Ripple network.
Additionally, a financial statement audit is in progress.
Best regards,
Bitstamp team

Cool  Smiley
Yawn.  Another "audit" that proves nothing, but reassures those who want to believe. 

At least we know the sum of the balances of all Bitstamp client accounts (if we trust Bitstamp, that is).  A useful datum, although useful to what I can't say at the moment.


Jorge, this is another example of you discarding information that doesn't meet your starting criterion of bitcoin = scam.
Confirmation bias doesn't do you any favours.



134. Post 6971958 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 27, 2014, 03:03:45 PM
Jorge, this is another example of you discarding information that doesn't meet your starting criterion of bitcoin = scam.
Confirmation bias doesn't do you any favours.
I have no reason to believe that Bitstamp is insolvent, but, if it were, it could and would easily fake that test.  That the test is accepted without criticisms only confirms how gullible bitcoiners are.

Bitcoin is not itself a scam, but I have never in my life seen an economic sector so chock full of scammers.  Every crook in the world who learns a little about bitcoin would want to "adopt" it.  It is a much more lucrative and "safe" vehicle for scams than the classical ones -- stolen credit cards, counterfeit cash, phony viagra, nigerian heirlooms, penny stocks, ponzi funds, ...

I remember people saying something similar when something called 'the Internet' started to gain momentary popularity in the late 90s. Thank goodness that didn't work out.
Bitcoin is a protocol. The rest will get worked out along the way, just as it was/is with the Internet.



135. Post 6974392 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Back to where we started the day. I'm calling that 'consolidation'.
Or something.



136. Post 6974579 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 27, 2014, 05:15:41 PM
Sweet mother....




We're retracing through this dip at a remarkable speed.



Hmm, not quite a 540 retest then. Thoughts on revisiting?



137. Post 6974869 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 27, 2014, 05:26:05 PM
I remember people saying something similar when something called 'the Internet' started to gain momentary popularity in the late 90s.
Did they?  Lots of stupid things were said about the internet back then, but scamming was not as big a problem for the internet as it is in the bitcoin world.   Perhaps because it was mostly classical scams (such as chain letters and credit card theft) that the police already knew how to recognize and handle.  One big "advantage"  of bitcoin is that law and police often cannot even tell whether a crime was committed. 


You are as selective in the points you answer as the information about bitcoin you choose to accept or ignore.



138. Post 6989242 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: JorgeStofli on May 28, 2014, 10:15:10 AM
I just bought my first bitcoin. Exciting. Could some please share the actual S.R. 2.0 link. Thanks.

I really like what you did there.



139. Post 6990069 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: PirateHatForTea on May 28, 2014, 11:15:07 AM
Great I go away for a little while and come back to this? This thread has gone to shit! It's the wall observer thread people. I'm not sure what this Stolfi character has to do with the current movement of bitcoin price (Hint: it's nothing), nor why we don;t ban an account whos eonly input to this thread has been the same post repeated every hour or so, claiming a mythical pump and dump.

Yeah, damn ChartBuddy. Change your tune or it's welcome to my ignore list.



140. Post 6992164 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on May 28, 2014, 01:21:03 PM
I just bought my first bitcoin. Exciting. Could some please share the actual S.R. 2.0 link. Thanks.

I really like what you did there.
That newbie is not me.

The Bitcoin Goddess is NOT PLEASED.  Guess what She does when She is not pleased.


Yes, Jorge, I'm well aware of that. I thought it was a good joke, is all.
Look, the thing is that although you make some useful points, and you are consistently polite in doing so, you are becoming increasingly strident. The fact that you very selectively choose what to argue - and a lot of people have made some very good points against some of your mistaken assumptions recently - means that it's not really worth engaging with you. Literally no point, because you appear to ignore anything that doesn't fit with what you already believe and move on.
That, unfortunately, effectively makes you a very polite troll. And I mean troll in its proper web-forum sense here, not just 'someone who doesn't agree with you'.




141. Post 6992906 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 28, 2014, 01:59:30 PM
I just bought my first bitcoin. Exciting. Could some please share the actual S.R. 2.0 link. Thanks.

I really like what you did there.
That newbie is not me.

The Bitcoin Goddess is NOT PLEASED.  Guess what She does when She is not pleased.


Yes, Jorge, I'm well aware of that. I thought it was a good joke, is all.
Look, the thing is that although you make some useful points, and you are consistently polite in doing so, you are becoming increasingly strident. The fact that you very selectively choose what to argue - and a lot of people have made some very good points against some of your mistaken assumptions recently - means that it's not really worth engaging with you. Literally no point, because you appear to ignore anything that doesn't fit with what you already believe and move on.
That, unfortunately, effectively makes you a very polite troll. And I mean troll in its proper web-forum sense here, not just 'someone who doesn't agree with you'.




Thanks, Cassius. Nearly 100% my own sentiment (although I hesitate to put a "very polite troll" into the same mental category as a regular, barely intelligible, run-of-the-mill troll... but that's a matter of taste I admit). Please note the unnecessary highlighted parts that I especially agree with Cheesy

It is a shame. But then, I don't think the Speculation thread is the right place for Jorge, anyway.



142. Post 6992982 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: p0peji on May 28, 2014, 02:08:40 PM
I just bought my first bitcoin. Exciting. Could some please share the actual S.R. 2.0 link. Thanks.

I really like what you did there.
That newbie is not me.

The Bitcoin Goddess is NOT PLEASED.  Guess what She does when She is not pleased.


Yes, Jorge, I'm well aware of that. I thought it was a good joke, is all.
Look, the thing is that although you make some useful points, and you are consistently polite in doing so, you are becoming increasingly strident. The fact that you very selectively choose what to argue - and a lot of people have made some very good points against some of your mistaken assumptions recently - means that it's not really worth engaging with you. Literally no point, because you appear to ignore anything that doesn't fit with what you already believe and move on.
That, unfortunately, effectively makes you a very polite troll. And I mean troll in its proper web-forum sense here, not just 'someone who doesn't agree with you'.



Something about a pot and a kettle.

You're suggesting that I'm a very polite troll? That would be an odd thing to say.



143. Post 6993362 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: p0peji on May 28, 2014, 02:28:33 PM
I just bought my first bitcoin. Exciting. Could some please share the actual S.R. 2.0 link. Thanks.

I really like what you did there.
That newbie is not me.

The Bitcoin Goddess is NOT PLEASED.  Guess what She does when She is not pleased.


Yes, Jorge, I'm well aware of that. I thought it was a good joke, is all.
Look, the thing is that although you make some useful points, and you are consistently polite in doing so, you are becoming increasingly strident. The fact that you very selectively choose what to argue - and a lot of people have made some very good points against some of your mistaken assumptions recently - means that it's not really worth engaging with you. Literally no point, because you appear to ignore anything that doesn't fit with what you already believe and move on.
That, unfortunately, effectively makes you a very polite troll. And I mean troll in its proper web-forum sense here, not just 'someone who doesn't agree with you'.



Something about a pot and a kettle.

You're suggesting that I'm a very polite troll? That would be an odd thing to say.

I am not suggesting you are a troll, it is just that you accuse Jorge of doing exactly that, which most pro-bitcoiners do.(read text in bold)

Ahh. Right.
I'm not sure it's an entirely apt comparison, but I think we've spent enough time discussing Jorge.

EDIT: I guess that could be called selective arguing. So be it. I'm a big polite troll.



144. Post 6993673 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 28, 2014, 02:42:02 PM
I just bought my first bitcoin. Exciting. Could some please share the actual S.R. 2.0 link. Thanks.

I really like what you did there.
That newbie is not me.

The Bitcoin Goddess is NOT PLEASED.  Guess what She does when She is not pleased.


Yes, Jorge, I'm well aware of that. I thought it was a good joke, is all.
Look, the thing is that although you make some useful points, and you are consistently polite in doing so, you are becoming increasingly strident. The fact that you very selectively choose what to argue - and a lot of people have made some very good points against some of your mistaken assumptions recently - means that it's not really worth engaging with you. Literally no point, because you appear to ignore anything that doesn't fit with what you already believe and move on.
That, unfortunately, effectively makes you a very polite troll. And I mean troll in its proper web-forum sense here, not just 'someone who doesn't agree with you'.



Something about a pot and a kettle.

You're suggesting that I'm a very polite troll? That would be an odd thing to say.

I am not suggesting you are a troll, it is just that you accuse Jorge of doing exactly that, which most pro-bitcoiners do.(read text in bold)

Ahh. Right.
I'm not sure it's an entirely apt comparison, but I think we've spent enough time discussing Jorge.

EDIT: I guess that could be called selective arguing. So be it. I'm a big polite troll.

p0peji has a point. 'Selective arguing' is just as common (if not more) among the Bitcoin optimists in here as it is with the pessimists. The difference is context: this is a forum of people that, by and large, are (or at least once were) excited about Bitcoin. So the difference between 'troll' and 'not troll' is not whether you argue selectively, but if you do so in a context that puts you at odds with the majority of the other participants.

The other difference is intention. To be really called a troll, your goal has to be to get a rise out of the majority of those who hold an opinion contrary to yours.

I'd say point 1 applies to Jorge, but point 2 doesn't. I don't really believe his goal posting here is to incite anger (although he's probably amused by the reactions to a degree). I've said it before, but I think he actually has the misguided belief that he somehow has to convince us of the error of our ways.

This is fair enough: selective arguing goes both ways. Glossing over that, selectively, I've been picking up a little more of 2) in the Prof's posts recently. I can't blame him, since he takes a lot of heat here. But I can not engage with him any more. Either one of those is good reason not to waste your time with someone.



145. Post 6994971 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: TakeTheSkyRoad on May 28, 2014, 03:29:07 PM
How did Jorge convert to a newbie?  Are there two Jorge accounts by the same person /bot or by different peeps/bots?

There's real Jorge and fake Jorge. Fake Jorge is far more entertaining.


Bitcoin magic, or a bug in the blockchain  Smiley

Slight spelling difference.... Stofli vs Stolfi

A fork?



146. Post 7016913 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: kireinaha on May 29, 2014, 03:54:49 PM
The news that Dish Network is taking Bitcoin is getting some major press:  ABC News, Wall Street Journal, Time, Washington Post.

It is always great to get press like this and tends to cause more people to look into Bitcoin.  Grin


You know what that means. Good news = dump.

Late last year, it could have been announced on reddit that some ma and pa cupcake store had decided to accept bitcoin and it would instantly rocket the price up $50. Now we have Dish Network -- which will be the largest single company to accept it -- and zero reaction. So it seems we've been a bit premature to assume that we've broken the bear market with last week's breakout. I agree with others that we're going to "consolidate" a bit more before going up again next month.

Quite possible, but wouldn't there necessarily be a lag anyway?



147. Post 7030348 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: windjc on May 30, 2014, 06:50:05 AM
I assume you guys have heard the news that BITFINEX is adding DRK?

I can't believe any exchange would want to associate themselves with an anonymous coin, but get it while its hot.

I am officially bullish on DRK.
seriously? after the forks? i can't find an offical announcement, can you point me?

Look at the DRK thread. Go to Bitfinex. There are screen shots and I have confirmed. Its not live yet, but they are setting it up as we speak.

HUGE drk pump (55%). Soon to be followed by huge short?



148. Post 7033852 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: p0peji on May 30, 2014, 11:07:31 AM
Best thing to do right now?? wait??

Have a sandwich. It's what I'm thinking of doing.
Maybe even a coffee.



149. Post 7036139 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

Quote from: ChrisML on May 30, 2014, 01:28:37 PM
agreed 800 is the short term target.
If you're referring to that little cursor dot, I didn't place that intentionally.

I giggled.

Ha! I assumed that was a small moon... (cue Star Wars quotes)



150. Post 7057390 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.48h):

I wonder what effect the HODL mentality will have on volume. Everyone seems to be expecting this clockwork, 9 month peak-to-peak, order-of-magnitude rally. That suggests a self-fulfilling target at which people are more likely to sell (why sell at $2000, which might otherwise seem perfectly reasonable, if you're pretty sure we'll see $3,000 before long?)



151. Post 7067095 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: Threebits on June 01, 2014, 07:02:40 AM
I can't imagine how average Joes [in China] are still brave enough to flow in with pboc's gun on the back?
I don't think that average Joe clients are under any pressure or threat.  At most they may have their bank accounts closed if they manage to use them to trade bitcoins.  If there will be penalties, they should fall only on card processors, exchanges, brokers etc..

Hm, clearly the money flow is not cut out but it isn't sufficient for why China is taking lead again.

Why China is taking the lead again, even though money flow in is more complicated than other areas?

-Chinese are real bitcoin believers?
-chinese are more greedy?
-chinese whales are special?

What else?

Maybe because China has a population of like 1 billion.  Even if a less percent of the Chinese use bitcoin, it is still a greater number than in the west.

For the educated, I wonder whether Chinese population is really bigger?

I tend to believe the main reason lies in RMB yuan. Chinese people has less confidence in their currency than other areas. Before Yuan collapses, China may inevitably take lead.

What are you suggesting? Fake volume?



152. Post 7067319 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: Parazyd on June 01, 2014, 07:48:33 AM
I can't imagine how average Joes [in China] are still brave enough to flow in with pboc's gun on the back?
I don't think that average Joe clients are under any pressure or threat.  At most they may have their bank accounts closed if they manage to use them to trade bitcoins.  If there will be penalties, they should fall only on card processors, exchanges, brokers etc..

Hm, clearly the money flow is not cut out but it isn't sufficient for why China is taking lead again.

Why China is taking the lead again, even though money flow in is more complicated than other areas?

-Chinese are real bitcoin believers?
-chinese are more greedy?
-chinese whales are special?

What else?

Maybe because China has a population of like 1 billion.  Even if a less percent of the Chinese use bitcoin, it is still a greater number than in the west.

For the educated, I wonder whether Chinese population is really bigger?

I tend to believe the main reason lies in RMB yuan. Chinese people has less confidence in their currency than other areas. Before Yuan collapses, China may inevitably take lead.

What are you suggesting? Fake volume?

Oh come on... So China is a small-populated country today. Seriously?

Yes. It's actually smaller than Belgium. Really.



153. Post 7067456 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: Parazyd on June 01, 2014, 08:08:59 AM
I can't imagine how average Joes [in China] are still brave enough to flow in with pboc's gun on the back?
I don't think that average Joe clients are under any pressure or threat.  At most they may have their bank accounts closed if they manage to use them to trade bitcoins.  If there will be penalties, they should fall only on card processors, exchanges, brokers etc..

Hm, clearly the money flow is not cut out but it isn't sufficient for why China is taking lead again.

Why China is taking the lead again, even though money flow in is more complicated than other areas?

-Chinese are real bitcoin believers?
-chinese are more greedy?
-chinese whales are special?

What else?

Maybe because China has a population of like 1 billion.  Even if a less percent of the Chinese use bitcoin, it is still a greater number than in the west.

For the educated, I wonder whether Chinese population is really bigger?

I tend to believe the main reason lies in RMB yuan. Chinese people has less confidence in their currency than other areas. Before Yuan collapses, China may inevitably take lead.

What are you suggesting? Fake volume?

Oh come on... So China is a small-populated country today. Seriously?

Yes. It's actually smaller than Belgium. Really.

Yeah... And Slovenia is the biggest country in the world.

Face. Palm.



154. Post 7067656 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 01, 2014, 08:31:53 AM
Bitcoin's collapse will probably just be one big candle straight to 0 - not something gradual that we predict and chart out with TA. Maybe the same with the economy.



I am sure you are an excellent technical trader


Aaaaaaaaaaahahaaaaaaahhhaaa!
If only i could be bothered to dig up her completely ridiculous predictions from the last few months. She is completely clueless. All her trading is based on some weird obsessive compulsive disorder how Bitcoin will crash. She lives in a fantasy world full of doom and gloom.
We all can see how that worked out for her.


I think TERA's doing just fine.



155. Post 7096293 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: MatTheCat on June 02, 2014, 08:34:33 PM
Wow, from $643 to $660 in one sec, that was a pretty big buy order. There a lot of big fish out there manipulating the market.

That one order alone pumped up the volume, the buy wall filled up quickly

And whatever nutjob did it is already $10 down on a few hundred Bitcoins with absolutely no guarantee that the buying power is there to support his 'brave' move.

It's nice to see you back, Mat. I thought you'd bailed altogether after getting whipsawed around one too many times on the way down.



156. Post 7128421 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.50h):

Quote from: Torque on June 04, 2014, 02:11:23 PM
i told ye bout this at 7000 satoshis.. bet none of ye listened!

https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/bter/nxtbtc
Looks like it's about to dive  Grin
Nxt never dives after a bubble pop.  It just keeps slowly dwindling down to nothing, keeping the Nxt nutters hopes alive.  It's all a game being played by the (70-ish?) number of founders initially granted all the premined Nxt, just to keep things going.  They sell some for btc or give it away, buy it back to create bubble mania, then slowly sell it off for btc again.  Not only have they made a shit ton of btc (and thus money) with their pump and dumps, but have probably managed to increase their original Nxt holdings astronomically as well, further skewing the overall distribution.


http://charts.nxtcrypto.org/cDistributionTopAccount.aspx



157. Post 7129877 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.50h):

Quote from: aminorex on June 04, 2014, 03:11:01 PM
eh, that just made no sense at all. You started off by saying you know LTC will bounce back and then in the next answer said it was grossly over valued and provides no additional value  Undecided  which one is it?!

Why such difficulty with the concept of time?  It is a partial order of states, each related to the previous, in which the local states of successors deviate from the local states of predecessors in degrees bounded by the uncertainty of the fine-structure.

LTC is oversold, thus it will go up on a short time frame.  LTC adds no fundamental value, thus it will go down on a long time frame.


I've noticed a curious duality in your posts recently. Where has magic monkey gone? Whilst I appreciate your own ideas I mourn his loss (though I have to wonder about his relationship with the painkillers you were taking).



158. Post 7132970 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.50h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on June 04, 2014, 05:31:16 PM
I've noticed a curious duality in your posts recently. Where has magic monkey gone? Whilst I appreciate your own ideas I mourn his loss (though I have to wonder about his relationship with the painkillers you were taking).

I have run out of painkillers, which is making me grumpy.  I am rather annoyed with the monkey as well.  If I report his cogitations (which are always indecisive until he calls a turn)  I risk my own reputation.  Oh well, I am pseudonymous for a reason:

Monkey says 625 on the 10pm bar was a low.  (He decided that at midnight, two hours later, with the price at 638.50.)  Monkey likes the upside for at least 4 more hours, considers 656 likely resistance.  EDIT: Monkey changed his mind and thinks its going down for 5 hours now.

On a daily basis, monkey is expecting to stay biased long until next Tuesday.  He first started to like the upside on the 16th, which was a pretty good call, methinks.  He had thought the 29th might turn south, but he was (a) wrong and (b) hedging.

On a weekly basis, the last time monkey gave up on his longs was the week of the 13th of December, 2013.  He failed to call that top out clearly, although he was on the verge of doing so.  He decided he liked the long side again the week of the 23rd of May, 2014, and is presently expecting to stay long for at least a month and a half.

Disclaimer:  The monkey swills expensive single malts constantly.  Invest accordingly (i.e., in distillers).  Monkey is a fuzzy reasoner.


Sorry for my ignorance but what the fuck are you guys calling magic monkey? Is it a price prediction model?

Sigh. Evolutionary psychology 101:
Your brain is broadly divided into 3 parts. The oldest of these is the archaiopallium, which deals with the most fundamental instincts - the four "F"s (fight, flight, feeding and mating). This area of the brain is sometimes known as the reptile brain, as it's all that reptiles have, or popularly your "Chimp" (though this term can also include the limbic system). It roughly corresponds to what Freud called the 'id'.
In Aminorex's case, these instinctive functions also include financial modelling.
Most of the time the id is tempered by the superego, which deals with internalised concepts of morality, and mediated by the ego. However, when the "higher" functions are dulled through use of painkillers or expensive single malt, the chimp or monkey brain wins through. (It's why people fight and have sex a lot when they're drunk.)
What you are seeing in these instances is Aminorex's monkey: pure, instinctive, unmediated financial analysis, unfettered by social convention.
Ignore it at your peril.



159. Post 7147917 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: aminorex on June 05, 2014, 02:05:56 PM
when you guys cash out big bucks.. do ye pay the capital gains or what? im wonderin how to get around that lol

in the u.s., hold everything in a roth vehicle.  requires foresight.


Looks like he's in the UK (hello...)
As far as I can tell, you're taxed on income at the exchange rate at the time of earning.
Then if your bitcoins appreciate and you cash out, you are liable for capital gains on them, minus the £10k allowance of course.
There may will of course be ways around this for the tax savvy. I just haven't needed to find out yet.



160. Post 7148238 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on June 05, 2014, 02:30:53 PM
What i miss? Oh we're still at 666 ok going back to sleep

I prefer to think of it as "the 665-667 range".

 Grin

We're currently at "Neighbour of the Beast".



161. Post 7148345 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: kodtycoon on June 05, 2014, 02:36:57 PM
when you guys cash out big bucks.. do ye pay the capital gains or what? im wonderin how to get around that lol

in the u.s., hold everything in a roth vehicle.  requires foresight.


Looks like he's in the UK (hello...)
As far as I can tell, you're taxed on income at the exchange rate at the time of earning.
Then if your bitcoins appreciate and you cash out, you are liable for capital gains on them, minus the £10k allowance of course.
There may will of course be ways around this for the tax savvy. I just haven't needed to find out yet.

ireland actually.. its really a grey area here.. no official statement has been released as to how to handle the tax on cryptos.. and also.. it they state bitcoin and not cryptocurrencies.. would that not be a loop hole so i can sach out to euro from another crypto?

That is a very interesting point. NXT is about to get a fiat exchange and that raises possibilities for me...
I suspect they'd take a dim view and I vaguely recall "bitcoin and bitcoin-like" language, but you might be onto something.  But if there's no regulation for Ireland then I guess you might get away with it. I'd still be inclined to put the relevant percentage in a safe interest-paying asset, in case they come knocking retrospectively.



162. Post 7148493 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: kodtycoon on June 05, 2014, 02:45:27 PM
when you guys cash out big bucks.. do ye pay the capital gains or what? im wonderin how to get around that lol

in the u.s., hold everything in a roth vehicle.  requires foresight.


Looks like he's in the UK (hello...)
As far as I can tell, you're taxed on income at the exchange rate at the time of earning.
Then if your bitcoins appreciate and you cash out, you are liable for capital gains on them, minus the £10k allowance of course.
There may will of course be ways around this for the tax savvy. I just haven't needed to find out yet.

ireland actually.. its really a grey area here.. no official statement has been released as to how to handle the tax on cryptos.. and also.. it they state bitcoin and not cryptocurrencies.. would that not be a loop hole so i can sach out to euro from another crypto?

That is a very interesting point. NXT is about to get a fiat exchange and that raises possibilities for me...
I suspect they'd take a dim view and I vaguely recall "bitcoin and bitcoin-like" language, but you might be onto something.  But if there's no regulation for Ireland then I guess you might get away with it. I'd still be inclined to put the relevant percentage in a safe interest-paying asset, in case they come knocking retrospectively.

ya i was thinking that.. i was also thinking buy silver off asset exchange, get it shipped to my house(its an option provided by the issuer of silver tokens) and bring it to a bullion to sell. but would they sell it for cash? i preferably dont want it going into my bank..(reasons other than tax)

Interesting idea. I suspect that unless you're dealing with large amounts of money (which brings problems of its own) you'd lose a lot at various points for shipping/insurance and spread, both ends. But yes, I don't see why that would be a problem - again, small amounts you could sell for cash.
Of course, if your ex-wife found out, I expect she'd be even more angry than the Inland Revenue.



163. Post 7148711 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: kodtycoon on June 05, 2014, 02:57:16 PM

@cassius

im going to look into how much can be exported from america and imported to ireland, and the amounts that can be sold for cash with in a certain period of time. i think that may be more viable than trying to stay under bank limits and it solves other issues too.

ps. im 22 and only a have a GF who doesnt care about the money so think im good on the x-wife side of things haha

Ha! There aren't that many reasons other than tax, child maintenance payments and partners with access to joint bank accounts for keeping big payments secret (that I can think of right now, anyway). I just couldn't resist the shot in the dark.  Grin



164. Post 7148898 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: kurious on June 05, 2014, 03:07:59 PM
What i miss? Oh we're still at 666 ok going back to sleep

I prefer to think of it as "the 665-667 range".

 Grin

We're currently at "Neighbour of the Beast".

No - surely the neighbour of the Beast is 668, or 664.



For what it's worth, we were at 664 at the time!



165. Post 7148925 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: Richy_T on June 05, 2014, 03:05:39 PM

@cassius

im going to look into how much can be exported from america and imported to ireland, and the amounts that can be sold for cash with in a certain period of time. i think that may be more viable than trying to stay under bank limits and it solves other issues too.

ps. im 22 and only a have a GF who doesnt care about the money so think im good on the x-wife side of things haha

Ha! There aren't that many reasons other than tax, child maintenance payments and partners with access to joint bank accounts for keeping big payments secret (that I can think of right now, anyway). I just couldn't resist the shot in the dark.  Grin

Illegal purchases? Though given that the (US) govt will start poking around transactions >$10,000 (including "structured" ones), probably best to assume a defensive strategy in any case.

Yes, though of what? If you're using bitcoins in the first place then there are far fewer things you'd want to pay for with cash.



166. Post 7150573 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: aminorex on June 05, 2014, 04:20:26 PM
monkey says down a bit now, intraday.  still looking for daily gains through late next week.  

in case you care: monkey thinks the s&p is very, very toppy here on a daily basis (monkey starts to buy vol over the next 2 weeks, makes diagonal puts with weekly options) and yet wants to buy USDJPY later today for a Monday reversal.  monkey is contrarian on TSYs and wants to buy some now, some more in a few days, to sell late next week or early the following week.



Ah, a while back I recall monkey discussing (in monkey language, but I believe this was the gist of it) the possibility of a summer stock market fall/incoming recession.



167. Post 7162590 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: nanobrain on June 06, 2014, 09:50:19 AM

My point was/is that wealth is still going to be concentrated in a few, so plus ca change.  As usual everyone here thinks the ideal of democratic govt is a bad thing but I'm not sure I want to live is digital fiefdom where Goat, Risto et al are the new masters.


There's a dystopian novel in that, somewhere.



168. Post 7162699 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: Ghris on June 06, 2014, 09:57:37 AM

No thanks, I want my BTC being able to buy a lot more.

yes I do as well, but not overnight, i want to rise to 700-800 in 1 month or more not in 3-10 days, stability is what we need, so again: go walls!

+1
The best growth is a stable 0.5-2.0% per month I would think. A huge climb will shun people as much as a huge dip.

True, but tell that to herd psychology. If it does get going, no one's going to care about sustainable. Sad but unavoidable.



169. Post 7167398 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: bangersdad on June 06, 2014, 03:22:54 PM
theres been some great dumping of NXT today.

Indeed. Not too surprising, though. Despite all the good news about, I don't blame people for taking a tidy profit at $0.1.



170. Post 7170560 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: Bitcoin_is_here_to_stay on June 06, 2014, 06:56:41 PM
Does anyone have an updated chart with the overlays of the previous bubbles and the current line on it? I have no clue how to make one.

More important question is - why would every bubble look the same?

Surface tension.
Less facetiously, there is a classic bubble progression - Google "Anatomy of a Bubble". Bitcoin does seem to do it well for some reason.



171. Post 7172160 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: Bitcoin_is_here_to_stay on June 06, 2014, 07:39:12 PM
Does anyone have an updated chart with the overlays of the previous bubbles and the current line on it? I have no clue how to make one.

More important question is - why would every bubble look the same?

Surface tension.
Less facetiously, there is a classic bubble progression - Google "Anatomy of a Bubble". Bitcoin does seem to do it well for some reason.

I agree in the large term scale - but for trading successfully, we need more details.

In terms of very long term view, just go long anytime now, should be fine 3-5 years from now Smiley Or a year.

Not quite sure what you mean, but there's a certain number of features it's fair to expect - like a bear trap, super-exponential phase, double top, and ultimately back to the mean after a period below it.
Trade those successfully and you'll be doing well.



172. Post 7184404 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on June 07, 2014, 04:39:16 PM
IMO we are at a point where we have a lot of high net worth, major corps, and invesent funds investing in Bitcoin. The days of huge swings, massive outbreaks, and downward spirals are over. I think we will see peaks and valleys in the range of 2-3% possibly at a faster pace than traditional stocks rise and fall but like I said to many major players now have too much to lose not to control the price. Not only that but if more retailers are to enter the "accepting" bitcoin game then the price has to show signs of long term stability and I think that's what we are seeing here. Long term investment growth, price stability for retailers to enter bitcoin, wider acceptance by the general public who don't have the knowledge or skills to enter a highly volatile market.

That's just my guess, he'll we could be at $1,000 on Monday. Who the hell knows.

Market cap is small enough that big money can still move the market (witness the whales mucking around to keep the price where they want it). Stability will be a while yet.



173. Post 7186741 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: nioc on June 07, 2014, 07:48:04 PM
IMO we are at a point where we have a lot of high net worth, major corps, and invesent funds investing in Bitcoin. The days of huge swings, massive outbreaks, and downward spirals are over. I think we will see peaks and valleys in the range of 2-3% possibly at a faster pace than traditional stocks rise and fall but like I said to many major players now have too much to lose not to control the price. Not only that but if more retailers are to enter the "accepting" bitcoin game then the price has to show signs of long term stability and I think that's what we are seeing here. Long term investment growth, price stability for retailers to enter bitcoin, wider acceptance by the general public who don't have the knowledge or skills to enter a highly volatile market.

That's just my guess, he'll we could be at $1,000 on Monday. Who the hell knows.


A lot of high net worth, major corps and investment funds are investing into a 8 Billion capsize, very little of which is for sale ?

Such entities investing in bitcoin in a conservative manner would bring the price at least 100 times higher.
Such entities investing in bitcoin aggressively would bring the price about 1000 times higher.

These entities still have not touched bitcoin with a pole stick.

I think you're absolutely wrong. Many high net worth individuals have come out to say they own bitcoin. We also have funds like second market, and more in the works. These people do not nor would they buy bitcoins on any of the exchanges that exist today. They would again IMO go to the major holders of today's Bitcoin and secure OTC purchases. They might even go to the major mining pools and buy direct. It wouldn't surprise me if a mining pool has already secured contracts to sell so many bitcoins at a set price over a period of mining to some key players. Everyone has an eye and a toe dipped into bitcoin, it's to risky not to, and when the time is right we will see what they want to do with it. One thing I can promise is you and I have no control, all we can do is sit back and enjoy whatever ride we are on.


Who is this everyone?  

As far as OTC transactions, If these people are selling OTC they aren't selling on exchanges.  How does that effect exchange prices?

Surely they'd arbitrage on the exchanges if it was worthwhile? Plus some will buy from exchanges (SecondMarket) if that's the cheapest source.



174. Post 7229744 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on June 10, 2014, 10:26:54 AM
I love this bit from the article (emphasis mine):
Quote
Now we have a small piece of pure, incorruptible mathematics enshrined in computer code that will allow people to solve the thorniest problems without reference to “the authorities”.
Which is bullshit, unfortunately.

There is no mathematical proof that the mining problem is hard, or that it is hard to get the private key of any given address.

No one has found how to do either of those things efficiently yet, but a smart teenager may find one tomorrow.  Or may have found it  already.

But bitcoiners need not worry, if that happens not only bitcoin, but all current e-commerce protocols will be compromised...


Oh for goodness' sake, Jorge. Do you have any understanding of the maths behind this, or how long it would take to implement a vulnerability in a useful way? Either you do, in which case this is pure and simple trolling. Or else you don't, which also raises plenty of questions. In either case I hope none of your students stumble across this thread.



175. Post 7229821 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: bangersdad on June 10, 2014, 10:40:52 AM
I love this bit from the article (emphasis mine):
Quote
Now we have a small piece of pure, incorruptible mathematics enshrined in computer code that will allow people to solve the thorniest problems without reference to “the authorities”.
Which is bullshit, unfortunately.

There is no mathematical proof that the mining problem is hard, or that it is hard to get the private key of any given address.

No one has found how to do either of those things efficiently yet, but a smart teenager may find one tomorrow.  Or may have found it  already.

But bitcoiners need not worry, if that happens not only bitcoin, but all current e-commerce protocols will be compromised...


Oh for goodness' sake, Jorge. Do you have any understanding of the maths behind this, or how long it would take to implement a vulnerability in a useful way? Either you do, in which case this is pure and simple trolling. Or else you don't, which also raises plenty of questions. In either case I hope none of your students stumble across this thread.

i think he has finally lost the plot  Smiley

I actually checked carefully several times to make sure this really was JorgeStolfi, not JorgeStofli. I'm still wondering whether someone else wrote it.
This simply isn't becoming of a respectable academic, Jorge.



176. Post 7230494 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: aminorex on June 10, 2014, 11:24:51 AM

I often forget that y'all are not in my mind.  (Or rather, that y'all are not aware that y'all are in my mind.)  Sorry.

Existential crisis incoming.



177. Post 7234153 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.51h):

Quote from: eat_more_fruit on June 10, 2014, 03:27:20 PM
Then you will realize the truth: That it is not the theorem which requires proof; it is only yourself.

Nonsense. Without proof, you cannot tell a theorem from a well formed formula.  

Oh COME ON. Did you not watch The Matrix?



178. Post 7253237 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Quote from: Torque on June 11, 2014, 03:13:11 PM

So if I'm interpreting this correctly, CB's purchasing of coins is limited by the speed of ACH transfers of new USD to the exchanges.  So what happens 3 business days from now, when their flood of new $ from today's Expedia news finally hits the exchanges?

Nice thought, but I don't buy it. Surely some interest would have filtered through to Stamp rather than backing up on Coinbase?



179. Post 7253458 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Quote from: Bitcoin_is_here_to_stay on June 11, 2014, 03:53:52 PM

So if I'm interpreting this correctly, CB's purchasing of coins is limited by the speed of ACH transfers of new USD to the exchanges.  So what happens 3 business days from now, when their flood of new $ from today's Expedia news finally hits the exchanges?

Nice thought, but I don't buy it. Surely some interest would have filtered through to Stamp rather than backing up on Coinbase?

Yeah, I also do not see why it is a big news and why it should cause a rally? It is nice btc is accepted more widely, but buying with it still does not make much sense, rather than to make a statement. On Expedia, even money sundering does not make sense, as tickets are non-anonymous Wink

Gox coins moving to Stamp, though, make much more sense as an explanation on a series of dumps on Stamp.

200k on Stamp would have an effect like 9 billion Ripples being dumped.
No one would be that dumb.



180. Post 7254879 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Quote from: Bitcoin_is_here_to_stay on June 11, 2014, 05:17:08 PM

So if I'm interpreting this correctly, CB's purchasing of coins is limited by the speed of ACH transfers of new USD to the exchanges.  So what happens 3 business days from now, when their flood of new $ from today's Expedia news finally hits the exchanges?

Nice thought, but I don't buy it. Surely some interest would have filtered through to Stamp rather than backing up on Coinbase?

Yeah, I also do not see why it is a big news and why it should cause a rally? It is nice btc is accepted more widely, but buying with it still does not make much sense, rather than to make a statement. On Expedia, even money sundering does not make sense, as tickets are non-anonymous Wink

Gox coins moving to Stamp, though, make much more sense as an explanation on a series of dumps on Stamp.

200k on Stamp would have an effect like 9 billion Ripples being dumped.
No one would be that dumb.


Well, Jed Caleb repeatedly confirmed that he is *that* dumb, he has actually started selling xrps. He is also creator and co-owner of Gox (12% shares). And co-defendant with Karpeles in the trial.

Heh. Guess he must be pretty angry with the board to follow through on it.



181. Post 7267207 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Quote from: dreamspark on June 12, 2014, 09:03:36 AM
Still no real explanation for Stamps lagging behind ? With the amount of USD longs on Finex I would have thought some people would have panicked and bought them back into line...

Rather than this suggesting Stamp's insolvency/Goxxery, it suggests that Stamp has temporarily become the go-to exchange for cashing out coins. People are buying/trading elsewhere and selling/withdrawing on Stamp. Curious. That suggests somewhere else is experiencing fiat withdrawal issues. Another round of Chinese games to come?



182. Post 7267309 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Quote from: dreamspark on June 12, 2014, 09:13:55 AM
Still no real explanation for Stamps lagging behind ? With the amount of USD longs on Finex I would have thought some people would have panicked and bought them back into line...

Rather than this suggesting Stamp's insolvency/Goxxery, it suggests that Stamp has temporarily become the go-to exchange for cashing out coins. People are buying/trading elsewhere and selling/withdrawing on Stamp. Curious. That suggests somewhere else is experiencing fiat withdrawal issues. Another round of Chinese games to come?
I don't think it says anything about their solvency, insolvency would normally cause people to get their coins out asap which would have the opposite effect. The explanation that its the go to cash out place could hold but why all of a sudden ? Somethings definitely brewing, would have thought someone would be arbing the gap as its been pretty constant.

The alternative is that it's one whale continually selling for reasons unknown to the rest of us. Someone earlier in the thread suggested it was one seller. I don't know how you establish that, or why the arb bots aren't taking care of the gap.
Some people have said it's easy to get money out but not in, without the rubber glove treatment. I guess that might incentivise a few to buy elsewhere and go to Stamp to cash out.
None of these explanations are really satisfactory to me, though. But insolvency does not fit either.



183. Post 7270173 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

BBC Technology page on the Expedia story: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27810008

What's interesting is
1) that the narrative has changed from uncertainty to a cautious assumption that Bitcoin will become a part of everyday life: "But, the digital currency took another step closer to the mainstream this week, with both Google and Yahoo adding its conversion price to its financial tools. More than 60,000 online retailers now accept bitcoins worldwide."

2) Even the great BBC don't really know what they're talking about and have to rely on others to tell them what to think. This line was obviously taken from a piece a good few months ago that no one bothered to check/update, presumably because they don't understand it and aren't keeping up with it: "There are currently about 11 million bitcoins in existence."



184. Post 7271943 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on June 12, 2014, 02:28:10 PM
1000+ BTC instadumped on Bitfinex  Shocked Shocked

A big fat arb, at last?



185. Post 7272629 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Quote from: Parazyd on June 12, 2014, 03:07:20 PM
When do you expect some significant movement, either down or up? Tomorrow, next week, next year?

"The unexpected very rarely happens. But when it does, it happens when you least expect it." Really wish I could find a source for that quote.

Exciting things seem to happen after a patch of low volume. I'll take a shot in the dark and say the recent move on moderate volume doesn't qualify us for that just yet.



186. Post 7272873 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Quote from: aminorex on June 12, 2014, 03:11:18 PM
and a monkey morning to you.

monkey is getting more excited about long bonds
monkey remains short btc for 4 more days
monkey has generously funded my retirement by shorting USDJPY
monkey finally decided the s&p is doomed on a weekly basis as well as a daily basis
monkey's adoration of silver is reinforced

monkey is doing pretty well lately


Well, there's your answer, Parazyd. Though I'm still uncertain about monkey's identity. I'm pretty much 50/50 on it being Aminorex's subconscious vs a Person of Interest, SkyNet-like Machine somewhere that's gradually learning to analyse its creators' financial systems.

Alternatively, I guess it could simply be a really unusual monkey.



187. Post 7272971 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Ah! It's clicked. I know why you're called Aminorex.
Don't worry, I promise I won't tell.



188. Post 7274252 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Quote from: magicmexican on June 12, 2014, 04:41:17 PM
Expecting prices to touch 520-560 unless some unexpected mini-rally happens

What are you smoking?

Just watching 1d graph + macD, 520-560 are 50% and 61% fibo levels, its most probable bottom in this situation.

The most bullish scenario is bouncing of 600, but thats very optimistic.

I wondered about a 540 retest a while back, but assumed we were past that now. As I recall, 620 was also pretty critical on the way down and appears to be sticky now too.



189. Post 7277278 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Quote from: YogoH on June 12, 2014, 07:48:09 PM
I agree. We just went 445 to 685 in a short time. I think a retrace back to 580-600 (most likely 600) is necessary. This just normal market action and no cause for panicat all.




190. Post 7285610 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.52h):

Woke up to find my $550 order got filled on Stamp. Looks like I somehow got lucky as the bottom of the candle seems to be around $560.
Any thoughts on volume? Was that our bottom?

Fonzie et al need not reply; I already know what you're going to say.



191. Post 7356056 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.53h):

Quote from: aminorex on June 17, 2014, 03:55:40 AM
Everyone knows bitcoin is a honey badger, not a person.

She won't mind a bit if you mellivoromophize her.

I think that's still illegal in most states.



192. Post 7385813 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.53h):

The auction was bearish. Now it's suddenly bullish?!



193. Post 7385887 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.53h):

Quote from: Parazyd on June 18, 2014, 07:33:43 PM
The auction was bearish. Now it's suddenly bullish?!

They've seen how much money the bidders have and now they plan to milk it all out.
Seriously, an actual bank.

Poor Jorge. This does not help his cause.



194. Post 7385949 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.53h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on June 18, 2014, 07:37:04 PM
The auction was bearish. Now it's suddenly bullish?!

They've seen how much money the bidders have and now they plan to milk it all out.
Seriously, an actual bank.
Everything in bitcoin is this way. Anything initially seen as bearish and causes a drop gets flipped around later with a bullish spin to seem bullish a cause rise.

Sometimes multiple times such as when the Bitcoin world discovered there's a rather large group of people called the Chinese.

Wake them up. They might like this.



195. Post 7386309 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.53h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 18, 2014, 08:03:14 PM

Not a chance a premium will be paid.  Care to place a small wager? Wink  There is enough liquidity over a weeks time on various exchanges to buy 3k in Bitcoins without much movement in the market.


Dunno about premiums, but I'm willing to bet most names on that list would be very reluctant to put money on any of the current exchanges, let alone dick around for a week dripping buys.

This. But would they risk looking dumb by paying over the odds?



196. Post 7403306 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on June 19, 2014, 06:57:37 PM
@people who believe (lot auction price) > (market price):  That's how I made my fortune.
I went around from one grocery store to the next, buying up sausages.  I assembled those sausages into ginormous wholesale lots, and sold them (at a substantial markup) to investors wishing to acquire huge lots of sausages without moving the market price.


So it's true. Doesn't matter whether the price goes up or down. Bulls and bears both make money, but pigs get slaughtered.



197. Post 7412250 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 20, 2014, 07:22:27 AM

[Stuff here]



I usually agree with nearly anything that Aminorex writes, and I thought that MatTheCat was a troll; however, here, MatTheCat communicates reason.  Well done MTC!!!    Wink   

[Some other stuff]


Yes, well done Mat, you clever sausage. Have some more condescension.



198. Post 7416857 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on June 20, 2014, 01:28:02 PM
Jorge will go down in history as one of the most successful trolls to have ever lived. Intelligent people here still don't understand he's a troll.

Is there anyone who ever said Jorge is not a troll Huh

Oda for one.

I don't think Jorge is a troll, per se -I think he just decided on the thesis for the book he plans to write about The Great Bitcoin Ponzi Scheme long before he showed up here to start doing research - so now he cannot allow himself to be swayed.

Sad because he would probably make more money investing in bitcoin than he is ever likely to make from any such book.


He reminds me of Fred Phelps. Very single minded and will never change, but you can't help thinking... anyone who spends that much time thinking about that, really must see something in it...



199. Post 7418763 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Quote from: Youghoor on June 20, 2014, 03:15:46 PM
Should I sell BTC before US auction of btc begins or should I hold ?

Absolutely.



200. Post 7420784 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 20, 2014, 04:55:02 PM
I am currently pessimistic about the chances of the price ever getting much higher than now
I bet you 1 bitcoin that some time during the lifespan of bitcoin the price will rise above the $580 range.  If this does not happen in the next 5 years, I give you a bitcoin.  Sound fair?

Oh and a sell off before July? This consolidation has bear trap written all over it.

For a variety of reasons, including how you have structured this bet, NO ONE with any brain would take this bet... maybe if you changed the reward to dollars, then possibly, who would want a bitcoin that may have little value in 5 years.

Also, maybe change the amount to $700 or some other more reasonable and higher amount.. $580 is the current floating price, as you know.... within 5 years, many would even bet $1000 or more... as a sure thing in their thinking.

I CAN'T TAKE THIS ANY MORE!! BETWEEN THE LINES, MAN. READ BETWEEN THE LINES. IS IT SO HARD?



201. Post 7421582 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 20, 2014, 05:51:19 PM
I am currently pessimistic about the chances of the price ever getting much higher than now
I bet you 1 bitcoin that some time during the lifespan of bitcoin the price will rise above the $580 range.  If this does not happen in the next 5 years, I give you a bitcoin.  Sound fair?

Oh and a sell off before July? This consolidation has bear trap written all over it.

For a variety of reasons, including how you have structured this bet, NO ONE with any brain would take this bet... maybe if you changed the reward to dollars, then possibly, who would want a bitcoin that may have little value in 5 years.

Also, maybe change the amount to $700 or some other more reasonable and higher amount.. $580 is the current floating price, as you know.... within 5 years, many would even bet $1000 or more... as a sure thing in their thinking.

I CAN'T TAKE THIS ANY MORE!! BETWEEN THE LINES, MAN. READ BETWEEN THE LINES. IS IT SO HARD?


Something is apparently obvious, yet there is a need to read between the lines?  Seems like you are having a meltdown, Cassius, about something trivial, no?


Blindingly, getting-smacked-about-the-face-with-a-halibut obvious.
Face, palm...



202. Post 7422378 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 20, 2014, 06:24:55 PM
I am currently pessimistic about the chances of the price ever getting much higher than now
I bet you 1 bitcoin that some time during the lifespan of bitcoin the price will rise above the $580 range.  If this does not happen in the next 5 years, I give you a bitcoin.  Sound fair?

Oh and a sell off before July? This consolidation has bear trap written all over it.

For a variety of reasons, including how you have structured this bet, NO ONE with any brain would take this bet... maybe if you changed the reward to dollars, then possibly, who would want a bitcoin that may have little value in 5 years.

Also, maybe change the amount to $700 or some other more reasonable and higher amount.. $580 is the current floating price, as you know.... within 5 years, many would even bet $1000 or more... as a sure thing in their thinking.

I CAN'T TAKE THIS ANY MORE!! BETWEEN THE LINES, MAN. READ BETWEEN THE LINES. IS IT SO HARD?


Something is apparently obvious, yet there is a need to read between the lines?  Seems like you are having a meltdown, Cassius, about something trivial, no?


Blindingly, getting-smacked-about-the-face-with-a-halibut obvious.
Face, palm...

NOT so obvious to me, whatever it is to which you are referring.

Is there toilet paper stuck to my shoe?  OMG... Why don't you just say it, rather than getting annoyed merely b/c you see something that someone else does NOT.  Each of us have our differing perspectives and senses, but the mere fact that someone sees something different than someone else does NOT make one more or less intelligent than another.... well, you may consider the matter differently, at least it seems that you do.   Roll Eyes

Alright, but this is a one-time thing, ok? After this, no more.
Jorge has made a reputation by proudly not owning bitcoin. So let's say he ignores the maths and enters the bet, and wow, he wins! Clever Jorge. Except he's just sold his principles for < $580, because now he owns a bitcoin, and suddenly all those months of leaving posts full of selective evidence and ignoring good answers were for nothing.
It was never supposed to be a real bet. Obviously, getting-slapped-around-the-face-with-the-fish-of-your-choice obviously. It was just a joke in the form of Socratic irony because naturally Jorge is never going to take it for those reasons.
I'm not sure why you think I'm annoyed. I suppose it might be my unnecessary over-use of capital letters.
And yes, you do have toilet paper stuck to your shoe.



203. Post 7422572 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Quote from: aminorex on June 20, 2014, 06:40:35 PM
I think that is supposed to represent me in the pic (by the way that is NOT me), getting my face smacked by a halibut that is NOT a halibut.   Cheesy

Calling Dr. Cassius!  Dr. Cassius, does the subjects cognitive apprehension of the concept of external representation of self constitute evidence of some vestigial functioning mirror neuron activity, or is this merely a Skinner-box effect?

 

Dr Aminorex. I stooped and my pregenual anterior cingulate cortex informs me that I should not have done. (It always was an overactive little illegitimate child.)
There is no need for you to do the same.




204. Post 7425221 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.54h):

Quote from: empowering on June 20, 2014, 09:36:33 PM
I think that is supposed to represent me in the pic (by the way that is NOT me), getting my face smacked by a halibut that is NOT a halibut.   Cheesy

Calling Dr. Cassius!  Dr. Cassius, does the subjects cognitive apprehension of the concept of external representation of self constitute evidence of some vestigial functioning mirror neuron activity, or is this merely a Skinner-box effect?

 

Dr Aminorex. I stooped and my pregenual anterior cingulate cortex informs me that I should not have done. (It always was an overactive little illegitimate child.)
There is no need for you to do the same.



Cassius and Aminorex ...I really like you guys... when this all plays out... drinks are on me ...at a place where there are drinks and sunshine and bikinis : )

edit: fuck it JayJuanGee and Jorge you are invited too!

  Cool I will look forward to it.



205. Post 7504821 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.55h):

Quote from: upupup on June 25, 2014, 10:03:35 AM
what is happening now is a rally between holders to sell without causing any panic, the book order is really thin with few thousands BTC at the Bid side while there is more than 12 million coins out there, do the math.

11 million as Satoshi is in for the long haul. Smiley

Auction is only two days away, so it is quite feasible that coins are being dumped to depress the market "reference" price ahead of bidding.

depressing? is that the right word?

if you are not willing to pay the market price and dumping coins on the market to bid lower...well, then the current market price is not right.

let us see then how much are they willing to pay.

I say 500.

I say its the most stupid forecast and explanation I ever heard.

That's because you're new here. It gets a lot more stupid.



206. Post 7529586 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.55h):

Quote from: Richy_T on June 26, 2014, 03:07:28 PM
Ok, i have 2 simple questions.
It's clear that this small auction completely controls the market. The market is filled with fear. It's reasonable to assume we even already went down 30 dollars because of this (which is insane btw).
Apparently people expect a rally or a dump depending on the outcome.

1: What will cause the rally and what will cause the dump?
2: Why is this considered so extremely important at the moment?

I really must be missing something. Hopefully someone can fill me in.

When no one really wants to buy and no one really wants to sell, it doesn't take much to move the price.

I think this might be the ultimate example of a Keynesian beauty contest. Everything knows it shouldn't be a big deal. But everyone is expecting everyone else to blink first, so a lot of blinking happens.
For the literal-minded among you, replace 'blink' with 'sell' and this will make more sense.



207. Post 7529911 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.55h):

Quote from: Richy_T on June 26, 2014, 03:33:24 PM
But how can a bank get income and pay for salaries and and all other costs ? well it is simple an Islamic bank isn't by the western definition a bank, it is a commercial institution, it is not a bank per se, you never get cash as a loan... you need a car? they buy you the car and rent it to you for a tiny profit until you become the owner, you need to buy a house ? they negotiate to buy it for you with the owner and you can live in it and pay "rent" for a time you agreed upon until you pay the whole price and you become the owner, you cant sell it untill you pay, simply you are not the owner of anything until you pay it off.  

You typically don't "own" the house with a regular mortgage either. With a car, it depends on whether the loan is secured on the car or not. It's basically the same in all but name but it's human nature to work around pointless restrictions.

Done properly there's a big advantage. Since you're effectively hire-purchasing a house, you cannot ever be in negative equity. Naturally, most banks don't like the idea of shifting liability onto themselves, hence the interest-driven model prevails elsewhere.



208. Post 7530103 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.55h):

Quote from: Richy_T on June 26, 2014, 03:46:26 PM

Done properly there's a big advantage. Since you're effectively hire-purchasing a house, you cannot ever be in negative equity. Naturally, most banks don't like the idea of shifting liability onto themselves, hence the interest-driven model prevails elsewhere.

I am sure it's not quite as simple as that. At the least the "bank" will charge extra to cover their risk. Then your house could still be worth less than you paid for it when all is done. I bet there's some hefty penalty clause for early termination too.

"Properly" meaning according to the spirit of the law. Ijara mortgages tend to be slightly more expensive than regular ones, in any case - unless you are foreclosed, I imagine. I don't know the details, but they're not competitive financially with standard mortgages.



209. Post 7530180 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.55h):

Quote from: Torque on June 26, 2014, 03:42:44 PM

Interesting tidbit for many here:

"They make the obvious prediction that the Bitcoin will be sold for under-market value"

Are you guys going to be flaming the Bitstamp owners now?

Can someone on this subforum answer this one simple question, instead of completely ignoring it:

Q: In a closed door auction, where no one outside of it will know what the selling price was, how can Bitstamp, you, or anyone else know what the winning price was?

And don't just reply "The selling price will get leaked out" or some silly crap, as we know hearsay FUD is completely unreliable.

<quick, run away and avoid answering this question.  Again.>   Roll Eyes


Oh, go on, I'll have a stab then.
Freedom of information request. Would take some time and may not be granted, but it's been mentioned by USMS.
Buyers may want to boast about their new purchase for one reason or another, perhaps to stabilise the market or show how clever they were to make a theoretical profit. Again, not a given but entirely possible.



210. Post 7530382 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.55h):

Quote from: Richy_T on June 26, 2014, 03:55:31 PM

Done properly there's a big advantage. Since you're effectively hire-purchasing a house, you cannot ever be in negative equity. Naturally, most banks don't like the idea of shifting liability onto themselves, hence the interest-driven model prevails elsewhere.

I am sure it's not quite as simple as that. At the least the "bank" will charge extra to cover their risk. Then your house could still be worth less than you paid for it when all is done. I bet there's some hefty penalty clause for early termination too.

"Properly" meaning according to the spirit of the law. Ijara mortgages tend to be slightly more expensive than regular ones, in any case - unless you are foreclosed, I imagine. I don't know the details, but they're not competitive financially with standard mortgages.

Seems to me like the spirit of the law is already pretty heavily subverted just by making a profit from lending money. You can dress it up how you like but it's all the same when you peek under the covers. What there appears to be is a heavy effort to conform to the letter of the law.

Yes: my understanding is that it's not carried out according to the spirit of the law, thus making it not-so-very-different to a traditional mortgage in either its payments or effects when things go wrong.



211. Post 7533479 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.55h):

When do the squeezed longs become critical? Is there any way of telling?



212. Post 7563521 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Quote from: aminorex on June 28, 2014, 12:00:11 PM
Always keep one of your eyes on alternative cryptos that offer innovation.

While many p2p protocols are useful, cramming every app into a freaking currency is asinine.

To be good enough as a currency to compete for the monopoly position of liquidity provider requires a laser focus on that specific end.  Any added functions create a tax on the economy of the whole market.  Liquidity abhors friction.

There are other far better, far more efficient, far more honest ways to incentivize the maintenance of a block chain for your bittorrent or twitter or whatever.

Any " innovations" that amount to embedding a tiny little lobotomized robotic Ben Bernanke into every computer on the Internet are quite unlikely to add any value.  Like lifetime of the universe unlikely.

You aren't going to improve chopsticks. You aren't going to improve the core function of liquidity - just make it efficiently usable.  Any " innovation" that makes it less efficiently usable is a SCAM.

Does this not beg the question? Or words to that effect.
If you create a P2P currency and pile on lots of other features that restrict that function, that's a Bad Thing.
If you create a platform for a digital economy and cash transfer happens to be one of the features that is leveraged for that ends, why is that a Bad Thing? Especially as useful functions are going to attract different people, thus bringing greater liquidity.



213. Post 7563734 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on June 28, 2014, 12:49:12 PM
Always keep one of your eyes on alternative cryptos that offer innovation.

While many p2p protocols are useful, cramming every app into a freaking currency is asinine.

To be good enough as a currency to compete for the monopoly position of liquidity provider requires a laser focus on that specific end.  Any added functions create a tax on the economy of the whole market.  Liquidity abhors friction.

There are other far better, far more efficient, far more honest ways to incentivize the maintenance of a block chain for your bittorrent or twitter or whatever.

Any " innovations" that amount to embedding a tiny little lobotomized robotic Ben Bernanke into every computer on the Internet are quite unlikely to add any value.  Like lifetime of the universe unlikely.

You aren't going to improve chopsticks. You aren't going to improve the core function of liquidity - just make it efficiently usable.  Any " innovation" that makes it less efficiently usable is a SCAM.

Does this not beg the question? Or words to that effect.
If you create a P2P currency and pile on lots of other features that restrict that function, that's a Bad Thing.
If you create a platform for a digital economy and cash transfer happens to be one of the features that is leveraged for that ends, why is that a Bad Thing? Especially as useful functions are going to attract different people, thus bringing greater liquidity.


That's the point of a programmable currency, the core system can stick to the KISS principle while allowing any amount of complex functions to be added externally. Some (a very few) of the alts have innovative features but nearly all of them can be implemented on top of Bitcoin and its by far the toughest network.

This makes sense but I'm not familiar enough with the protocol to know whether including certain features would make building particular applications easier or more effective. It seems inelegant, for example, to build an application to enable instant transactions and real-time trading on top of the bitcoin protocol, due to the 10-minute block time. I'm still on the fence on this one, though in practice I suspect people will use the option that works out-of-the-box. There's the friction that occurs within the protocol/system itself and the friction that occurs between user and protocol.

Your sig quote is one of my favourites, but sadly it's not one of mine. I've no idea where it comes from - couldn't find an original source.



214. Post 7563740 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Quote from: vleroybrown on June 28, 2014, 12:57:49 PM
Most of the bitcoin faboys don't care about technological developments in the field of finance. All they're interested in is wealth redistribution. To switch places with the current elite that is earning with interest, so they themselves could earn with deflation. They can't see that the endgame is about making the financial system more transparent, not about making it more anonymous. Anonymity is helping the crooks while transparency would help the society in general.

That is the reaso why I dispise the majority of bitcoin fanboys. A bunch of lazy and hypocritical crooks if you ask me.
It doesn't apply to everyone, but the majority is what it is.

You sir, respectfully are an idiot

Disrespectfully would also work well here.



215. Post 7565717 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on June 28, 2014, 01:09:00 PM
....
This makes sense but I'm not familiar enough with the protocol to know whether including certain features would make building particular applications easier or more effective. It seems inelegant, for example, to build an application to enable instant transactions and real-time trading on top of the bitcoin protocol, due to the 10-minute block time. I'm still on the fence on this one, though in practice I suspect people will use the option that works out-of-the-box. There's the friction that occurs within the protocol/system itself and the friction that occurs between user and protocol.

Your sig quote is one of my favourites, but sadly it's not one of mine. I've no idea where it comes from - couldn't find an original source.

The sig was part of a discussion a you had with aminorex (iirc) a few weeks ago, I C&P'd it straight from the post but I'll change it shortly if its a problem. I quoted it as soon as I read it but there was some much better stuff in that post, very informative and much appreciated.

We're only scratching the surface of what can be achieved with the protocol so far and I wouldn't be surprised if the trustless verification leaves the use as a currency far behind sometime. The ten minute blocks seems like a problem but essentially it means you only have to trust any system that transfers ownership for ten minutes, be that stock exchanges, car dealerships, estate agents or anything else that requires a trusted third party to verify transfer.

EDIT: Got it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg7132970#msg7132970

EDIT2: Doh, I get it now. Thanks for quoting an excellent piece from an unfortunately unknown source Smiley

No worries on the sig. You know you've arrived on these boards when someone quotes you in their sig Smiley Just didn't want to look like I was trying to take credit for someone else's words. When I do that I always make sure I won't get found out.



216. Post 7601326 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Quote from: ChrisML on June 30, 2014, 02:46:37 PM
Another "btw".   Cheesy

Btw, not that I'm a huge altcoin lover or anything, but to anyone who thinks Litecoin is sold off, completely dead, and will never rise exponentially from here.  Well Litecoin just jumped 5% too.  For such a dead coin, so strange right?  Right?

So yeah, it's still relatively pegged to BTC, although the LTC market is always lagging the BTC market.  So don't be shocked if it also goes to the moon during/just after the next BTC bubble.

Erhm, thanks for the info, I guess?

http://coinmarketcap.com/ says Litecoin is having a bad day, as I would expect it to continue doing for some time. I don't understand the 5% pump statement.

EDIT: or did it dump quickly too?



217. Post 7626872 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Did we not have a good estimate at $665?



218. Post 7626888 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Quote from: Raystonn on July 01, 2014, 08:58:46 PM
This drop will create the new floor on high volume.  One buyer is very bullish.  It means the sale price was likely higher than most anticipated.


And a LOT of interested parties with no bitcoins.



219. Post 7626906 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Quote from: kodtycoon on July 01, 2014, 08:59:40 PM
he must have paid a premium to get all of them! is that not a seriously bullish sign or is their going to be fear of him dumping them?

I don't think he'll dump. He'd have bought at well above market to ensure he got them.



220. Post 7638211 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on July 02, 2014, 12:48:47 PM

Interesting, seems legit:
http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2014/05/07/steve-case-tim-draper-back-bitcoin-startup-vaurum.html

"Vaurum's software helps financial institutions host their own bitcoin exchanges."



221. Post 7638628 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: 600watt on July 02, 2014, 01:10:15 PM

If true: 30000 FRESH bitcoins (previously blocked) are going to be offered to institutions through a new exchange. The bull in me is running to the hills. After selling.


are you saying price will go down because those coins will be for sale via new exchanges in developing economies ? and for sure they sell em for less than what they payed. Roll Eyes and don´t forget ZHE MILLIONS of fresh bitcoins that will be available because of mining in the next few years ??!1!!

and what about the millions of coins that are already sold. shit, they may get sold again !  and those buyers of all those coins may sell them AGAIN. i wonder why btc price ever went above 1 cent with all this selling   Tongue

This. I'm actually planning on buying a few bitcoins just so I can short them and buy them back cheaper. Repeat, get rich.



222. Post 7639356 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: 600watt on July 02, 2014, 01:53:29 PM
Alright, the Tim Draper/Vaurum news looks legit enough:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/sns-rt-us-usa-bitcoin-20140701,0,4038036.story


Still, he didn't mention the price, despite informing Reuters that he won the auction.

My conclusion: Either he's trying to build suspense, waiting some more before releasing the price he paid. If no such thing happens, I'll suspect that the price per coin was perhaps somewhat above market that day (~600), but below current market, and he'd rather not disclose the exact number to not cause a crash.

Not necessarily bearish, btw. A ~600 floor would be pretty great long term. OTOH, if it turns out we're ~$50 above auction price right now, we might see a small-ish correction near term.

i don´t really think that more than 40 wealthy entities all just made bids below market price or just slightly above it, letting a 600ish bet win every chunk. for a single bidder to win 'em all, he must have picked a higher price.

if you are right than draper is one hell of a poker player. my guess is way above 700.

Exactly: he outbid EVERY SINGLE OTHER bidder, at least some of whom must have put in market or market + a bit bids.
Poker indeed, and nicely done. Of course, we won't know how nicely until we find out how much he paid.



223. Post 7639615 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: empowering on July 02, 2014, 02:11:15 PM
I am compiling a list of resources for a person that is totally not up to date and does not get Bitcoin/Crypto currency

The person has a finance background, and a legal background- the person is not technically minded

I have list of resources , videos, text, articles and good places to get key data.

has anyone any works they suggest may be suitable for this gentleman to read ?  (I get the feeling he is more of a reader than a video watcher, plus I have some good videos already- though if you have any amazing links please do share)

I am almost ready to send what I have, but just thought I would ask here if anyone has any good primers to add to my list or rather than me writing it all out again.

The gentleman is a man with very deep pockets and a group of investors, I have meetings planned with the person in question to discuss starting
a Crypto/Bitcoin relegated company here in the UK -

I am looking for good text primers for a person new to crypto but that has a good finance background,  not too basic, not too full on   have you any suggestions that I can add to my ever growing list ?  I do not want to send him everything, I am looking to cherry pick.

Already had one meeting with the chap in question, and before the next one I would like him to do some reading, so he knows more about where
his money is going to be going, before the next rounds of meetings- as the guy is pretty much a crypto newbie.

Thank you in advance.


http://vimeo.com/nxtorg
Lots about crypto more generally there too, just in the NXT context.



224. Post 7640879 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: aminorex on July 02, 2014, 03:23:01 PM
This. I'm actually planning on buying a few bitcoins just so I can short them and buy them back cheaper. Repeat, get rich.

You will be.... TAIL RISK MAN!

Ah, but there's nothing standard about my deviations.



225. Post 7643108 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: SirChiko on July 02, 2014, 05:17:08 PM
Who wouldn't be okay with it? Grin Also 800 next week? I guess 700 max 750 if we will see some kind of rally.

Jorge, fonzie, and where is that big Russian bear igorr these days...?



226. Post 7655043 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on July 03, 2014, 10:42:13 AM
facebook twins show progress on nasdaq
The twins who missed the facebook train bought another slot on Bloomberg

bidder of btc silk road auction comes forward (big into btc investment)
The 44 bidders at the SilkRoad auction are too ashamed to reveal their bids (except one at 403$)

newegg says it will take btc
Newegg says it will take dollars even from bitcoiners who decide to unload some of their btc.

kuwait oil (dept of some kind) says use btc to pay for oil

BITCOIN, DOES ZIP STAYS AT AROUND $645 usd
BITCOIN, SURPRISINGLY, FAILS TO DROP BELOW 650$

Fixed that for you  Grin

(Too lazy now to read that Kuwait thing.)


Sounds like you're getting worried, Jorge.



227. Post 7662859 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: aminorex on July 03, 2014, 07:42:56 PM
support rebuilding

Monkey sounded an all-clear.  Could still wobble a bit over the next 90 minutes or so, but unlikely to break lower.

Given how weak his daily outlook is -- although it did stop wavering +/-, it is only weakly +ve yet -- I think he is tipping me that this sort of thing may repeat a few times before the next daily-scale impulsive move.

What are monkey's thoughts on bubbles? Specifically speculative ones, I'm not really that fussed about his approach to soapy water.
The idea seems to be very popular around here but they don't seem to want to arrive on time.



228. Post 7673664 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: Dotto on July 04, 2014, 01:20:41 PM
Who would've guessed. Best week ever. Nothing but amazing news.
One fuddish news article and down we go.

Seriously how are we ever supposed to go up again if amazing news does nothing and any slightly negative news and it's dump fest.

This current dumping was so expected. They were just waiting for an excuse. Really anything could've done it.
It's all about fear and panic. It's what everyone is waiting for. All day they hoover their finger over the sell button thinking "can i dump already". Then they read a headline "bank EU warning" and bam! Dump!

So sick of it.
I totally understand why new people are afraid to buy. They see that anything, really anything causes people to dump. I wouldn't buy at these levels. I wouldn't advise my friends to buy.


We need to squeeze those longs, free some money up.

I only read you, Shrooms for the quote, because you are ignored some time ago. You seriously should try yoga, meditation, spending time in the beach/mountain. Your post reflex you are having a really bad time, day by day. Stop worring. Breathe. Go nature. It will fix itself.

But seriously - the dumps and hesitancy to rise despite all the good news. There has got to be a limit to the amount sellers can sell (weak hands, strong hands argument).
So what is going on? Where are all the sellers coming from? Twitchy day-traders or early adopters with big stashes taking advantage of better liquidity?
Anyone have any insights, ideally backed up with some evidence like days destroyed or exchange data?



229. Post 7673921 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: dreamspark on July 04, 2014, 01:32:24 PM
But seriously - the dumps and hesitancy to rise despite all the good news. There has got to be a limit to the amount sellers can sell (weak hands, strong hands argument).
So what is going on? Where are all the sellers coming from? Twitchy day-traders or early adopters with big stashes taking advantage of better liquidity?
Anyone have any insights, ideally backed up with some evidence like days destroyed or exchange data?

My thoughts always gravitate to it being mostly to do with people just making a bit of extra money but more importantly more coins.

There are very few investments where you aren't trying to come out with a bigger pile of fiat, in general when you trade a normal stock you tend to buy a position and then sell (or buy if you were short) and leave with the profit.

With Bitcoin however people are trying to make more of the 'stock' than fiat (obviously a generalization but can you draw any parallels?) a lot of people are also all in in terms of how much they are willing to invest, to make more BTC and not more fiat without leverage you have to sell and buy back at a lower price. I seriously think this is one of the reasons people are so willing to sell their BTC for the chance to buy it back lower even though the majority of them would have been better to buy and hold.

Short answer, bad judgement: people trying to read the market and accumulate more, probably just coming out worse by giving their coins to others?
Sad world.

Edit: don't know why this surprises me. Short-term thinking is everything wrong with capitalism and the financial sector, and I guess it's what characterises a 'weak hand' in the first place.



230. Post 7740949 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.58h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on July 08, 2014, 06:58:27 PM
Did anyone post this one already?

http://redditmetrics.com/r/bitcoin

Quote
Trending now! 928 new subscribers today, 578% trend score – Trend thread

Not sure why? Maybe bots are doing this, maybe it's because of Ukrainian bitcoin ATM news, maybe Roger Ver's tweets... Maybe something is about to happen.

I'm liking what that correlates to on the timeline...



231. Post 7768921 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.58h):

Just swinging by and don't know whether this has already been mentioned, but there was a hack earlier and 1170 stolen coins seem to have been dumped on Stamp. Could explain a bit.



232. Post 7769110 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.58h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on July 10, 2014, 01:37:04 PM
Just swinging by and don't know whether this has already been mentioned, but there was a hack earlier and 1170 stolen coins seem to have been dumped on Stamp. Could explain a bit.

Links pls, thanks.

https://nxtforum.org/general-discussion/price-speculation/5480/?topicseen



233. Post 7769206 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.58h):

Quote from: Parazyd on July 10, 2014, 01:47:02 PM
Just swinging by and don't know whether this has already been mentioned, but there was a hack earlier and 1170 stolen coins seem to have been dumped on Stamp. Could explain a bit.

Links pls, thanks.

https://nxtforum.org/general-discussion/price-speculation/5480/?topicseen

So where are the 1170 BTC stolen? I don't get it.

https://twitter.com/TwinWinNerD/status/487215910370164736

Edit: maybe odd coincidence



234. Post 7823750 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.58h):

$630, lowish volume. It's not super dumpy, really.



235. Post 7824904 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.58h):

Isn't that launch pad line in a bit of a weird place?



236. Post 7966064 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.00h):

Wasn't some major regulatory decision due in the next few days, or did that already happen?



237. Post 8330888 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.04h):

Been away from this thread for quite a while due to boredom and loss of patience with its many trolls. But hey, finally, something's up. Is this the long-overdue $540 retest?



238. Post 8331241 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.04h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 13, 2014, 02:20:29 PM
BitPay/Coinbase for online gambling? Do you know what they do?
Sorry, I don't gamble so I don't know how online gambling sites work.  You mean that they only take bitcoins, is that correct?


Where is the facepalm icon? I swear I've seen one around somewhere.



239. Post 8331729 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.04h):

Quote from: Riddikulo on August 13, 2014, 02:54:33 PM
All of this because a little dump of Ethereum? What is going to happend when they dump all the 24k coins?

Probably what happened when the Silk Road coins were 'dumped'.



240. Post 8346727 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.04h):

Not a Monero thread. Or a pump. But since we're on the subject of privacy...
I have concerns about Monero: ring signatures are a fantastic advance but there is currently the problem of intolerable blockchain bloat. Plus with advances in computing there is the potential for them to be rendered far less secure in the future (as with mixing solutions, like Darkcoin's).
There is an interesting new protocol called Teleport being implemented by BTCD. It can be used by any other coin, either incorporated in their protocols or used as a separate service. To me, it makes sense to use bitcoin's network effect with such a third-party anonymiser.
I'd be interested in hearing (meaningful, considered) feedback on the idea. They have a preliminary darkpaper here: http://www.flipgorilla.com/p/23023990364728535/show#/23023990364728535/0



241. Post 8353983 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

My goodness the drivel on this thread is remarkable. It reminds me why I left.



242. Post 8354097 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: kireinaha on August 14, 2014, 06:45:16 PM
My goodness the drivel on this thread is remarkable. It reminds me why I left.

So why don't you contribute something then?

Did, earlier today. Rather interesting paper on anonymity in the context of Risto switching his affections to Monero. Point was that Monero suffers from unsustainable blockchain bloat and until they fix it, it can't go anywhere. Teleport seems to offer a new approach to anonymity that avoids the problems of ring signatures and mixing. Asked for feedback since privacy is a big deal and the coin that nails it will do well. No one gave any.



243. Post 8354203 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 14, 2014, 06:57:15 PM
My goodness the drivel on this thread is remarkable. It reminds me why I left.

So why don't you contribute something then?

Did, earlier today. Rather interesting paper on anonymity in the context of Risto switching his affections to Monero. Point was that Monero suffers from unsustainable blockchain bloat and until they fix it, it can't go anywhere. Teleport seems to offer a new approach to anonymity that avoids the problems of ring signatures and mixing. Asked for feedback since privacy is a big deal and the coin that nails it will do well. No one gave any.


LINK!!!! or it didn't happen...  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

You spend your life on these boards so I'm surprised you missed it. Still, so you can ignore it again:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg8346727#msg8346727

Note that I asked for considered, meaningful feedback, which was perhaps why I didn't get any.



244. Post 8354231 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: aminorex on August 14, 2014, 07:03:35 PM
Point was that Monero suffers from unsustainable blockchain bloat and until they fix it, it can't go anywhere.

That's the FUD story.  The fact is that XMR blockchain is about 5.5x the size of bitcoin, and that number tends to go down over time.

Quote
Teleport seems to offer a new approach to anonymity that avoids the problems of ring signatures and mixing. Asked for feedback since privacy is a big deal and the coin that nails it will do well. No one gave any.

You might get more feedback if you didn't call it 'teleport'.  Sounds too much like pixie dust, so I won't take time to look.  I'll let others with more time do that.


I expected more of you, Aminorex. Any advance in this field is worthy of consideration, assuming you meant anything you've previously said about privacy. But each to their own.



245. Post 8354336 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: kireinaha on August 14, 2014, 07:07:26 PM
My goodness the drivel on this thread is remarkable. It reminds me why I left.

So why don't you contribute something then?

Did, earlier today. Rather interesting paper on anonymity in the context of Risto switching his affections to Monero. Point was that Monero suffers from unsustainable blockchain bloat and until they fix it, it can't go anywhere. Teleport seems to offer a new approach to anonymity that avoids the problems of ring signatures and mixing. Asked for feedback since privacy is a big deal and the coin that nails it will do well. No one gave any.

I agree, Monero is already dead in the water. I have the feeling that Ristro invested a massive amount of money into it (which probably is the cause of the rally up to $4/coin a couple months ago) and is now doing his best to pump it to others here. He's going to have to cut his loose before long and switch to the next thing.

Right. I'm happy to be reeducated about ring signatures - which are, after all, a fantastic advance - and the potential issues of blockchain bloat. But the fact is the more signatories, the greater the bloat, and with advances in computing that's what you're going to need. If there was a way to do it more simply and effectively, then that solution would presumably gain market share. CoinJoin (sounds like a form of venereal disease, so don't bother looking into it Aminorex) has its own issues.



246. Post 8354433 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: aminorex on August 14, 2014, 07:19:25 PM
I expected more of you, Aminorex. Any advance in this field is worthy of consideration, assuming you meant anything you've previously said about privacy. But each to their own.

Once it is proven to be an advance, yes.  Privacy claims of altcoins have a dismal history.  You will have to forgive my priors.


This was sort of the point. I'm not here to pump a coin (who would do such a thing?) but to get feedback on an idea. Admittedly, it's probably the wrong place for that, but it seemed in context at the time.
Ah well.



247. Post 8354540 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 14, 2014, 07:27:03 PM
My goodness the drivel on this thread is remarkable. It reminds me why I left.

So why don't you contribute something then?

Did, earlier today. Rather interesting paper on anonymity in the context of Risto switching his affections to Monero. Point was that Monero suffers from unsustainable blockchain bloat and until they fix it, it can't go anywhere. Teleport seems to offer a new approach to anonymity that avoids the problems of ring signatures and mixing. Asked for feedback since privacy is a big deal and the coin that nails it will do well. No one gave any.


LINK!!!! or it didn't happen...  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

You spend your life on these boards so I'm surprised you missed it. Still, so you can ignore it again:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg8346727#msg8346727

Note that I asked for considered, meaningful feedback, which was perhaps why I didn't get any.


I remember seeing the link, but I did NOT click on it the first time.  I have a hard enough time reading thread posts and keeping up with other things in my life.  As you suggested, I have been spending quite a bit of time on the forum recently, but I do have a life outside of the threads, as well.

Regarding the substance of your paper, it looks like a very well written paper.. at least the parts that I browsed through - of course it is 36 pages, and i am NOT a technical expert in the BTC space so I am NOT sure if I could give a meaningful and/or in depth discussion .. yet are you suggesting some of the privacy features of Monero, for example, could be brought to bitcoin through teleport technologies?



No.



248. Post 8354687 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 14, 2014, 07:35:20 PM

Quote
A bunch of, like, whatever

Well one thing is building on existing coins or another thing is creating your own coin... which the second really would NOT be appropriate to pursue in this thread; however, the former may be good to discuss ways that BTC may be improved that would help in its adoption in the security realm.

Fair point. I'm glad we have you as the final arbiter of what's appropriate. Goodness knows what would get posted in this thread otherwise.



249. Post 8354991 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 14, 2014, 07:53:31 PM

Quote
A bunch of, like, whatever

Well one thing is building on existing coins or another thing is creating your own coin... which the second really would NOT be appropriate to pursue in this thread; however, the former may be good to discuss ways that BTC may be improved that would help in its adoption in the security realm.

Fair point. I'm glad we have you as the final arbiter of what's appropriate. Goodness knows what would get posted in this thread otherwise.

If it is a fair point, then why you going all HOSTILITY towards my post or towards me... you know that at least I responded to your previous post, and I attempted to figure out what your link was about.. more or less...


Oh, how did this happen again? After last time I promised myself I wouldn't demean myself by engaging with it.
I wasn't being serious. It wasn't a fair point, that was me being ironical.
In your defence, it's not the first time that's got me into trouble. You've no idea how often people think I'm being mean to my wife, for example. (They're only right a small proportion of the time.)
Basically I'm a bad person and you shouldn't talk to me.



250. Post 8355078 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 14, 2014, 08:13:21 PM

Well that is up to you if you recognize a potential problem and whether you believe that it needs to be worked on or NOT.... Either way, I am o.k., and it seems that I did misunderstand you, so I take back any harsh feelings that I may have emoted in your direction.   

I'm ok. I'm glad you're ok too.

I need a hug now.



251. Post 8355531 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: dani on August 14, 2014, 08:47:57 PM
I don't know what you guys are doing

Socratic irony, followed by a Platonic hug. Not sure what comes next. I'm uncomfortably aware it might involve a Trojan, though.

Quote
but I just allowed myself 1BTC

 Cheesy

for the records later on: 514$

Quoted, for the record. Let's hope you're right.



252. Post 8875615 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.13h):

Quote from: mmitech on September 18, 2014, 03:11:31 PM
if your average cost of a BTC is less than 400 and if you are too invested and have troubles sleeping at night because of this trend, or if you are afraid and not sure about your strategy, now is your chance to reduce your position better than later at a loss (if the price fall further). 

at the end of the last year and beginning of this year, I said it was a good idea to sell some coins (people who bought around $100-200) and take the profits while you can, and now I am telling you that you can still take some profits.... I am afraid that there is a possibility that many of you will regret not doing so later.

Ah, mmitech. I guess you must be feeling pretty stupid right now, having sold half your stash a couple of months back when a certain person made it clear this was a really bad idea as the only way was up. But no, you wouldn't listen...



253. Post 8875755 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.13h):

Quote from: mmitech on September 18, 2014, 03:25:46 PM
if your average cost of a BTC is less than 400 and if you are too invested and have troubles sleeping at night because of this trend, or if you are afraid and not sure about your strategy, now is your chance to reduce your position better than later at a loss (if the price fall further). 

at the end of the last year and beginning of this year, I said it was a good idea to sell some coins (people who bought around $100-200) and take the profits while you can, and now I am telling you that you can still take some profits.... I am afraid that there is a possibility that many of you will regret not doing so later.

Ah, mmitech. I guess you must be feeling pretty stupid right now, having sold half your stash a couple of months back when a certain person made it clear this was a really bad idea as the only way was up. But no, you wouldn't listen...

[sarcasm] yes, I feel sorry for selling at $6xx  Embarrassed , I beat my self everyday because of it, I could be making a ton of money if I didn't sell and listened to the bunch of perma-trollsbulls that hang around here. [/sarcasm]

Where are JJG and Trolfi? I haven't dropped by here for a while, and it seems so much more peaceful without them. I almost feel like staying.



254. Post 8889514 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Chartbuddy just became self-aware.
Bullish? Or is this going to end like T2: Judgement Day?



255. Post 8889625 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.14h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 19, 2014, 02:36:12 PM

It is still pretty fucked that they do NOT have enough coins... maybe they should have been accumulating so they could fill all new orders.. dumb asses.

No, not really. That's not their business model.



256. Post 8977773 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 26, 2014, 08:53:03 AM
and we are back to pre-Paypal news (as expected), I was thinking these past few days and I think that I will start buying back between $100-200.

lol!




At least, he has been thinking... which should help him to formulate more realistic views, unless he's on some kind of fantasy loop in which the thinking does NOT cause him to escape from his fantasy?

I'd be a little careful, JJG. Last time you ridiculed mmitech for a bad decision, it turned out he'd called it perfectly.
Just sayin'



257. Post 8977961 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 26, 2014, 09:11:46 AM

So, anyhow, I am having a little bit of confusion about why you feel necessary to jump in to support mmitech's various predictions - this one and/or his previous predictions? 


Nevermind. It's not worth the trouble.



258. Post 9276403 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.25h):

Quote from: spiderbrain on October 21, 2014, 10:16:59 AM
Can the madness go on forever ?
The US has already exceeded one of the three classic precursors of hyperinflation. Japan, Europe and China aren't too far behind, However, because most of the money is nominally  sitting in shares (US) property (China) government debt (Europe, Japan) it's all holding together. Once people start trying to liquidate I suspect it will all turn to custard surprisingly quick.

Don't worry, crypto will be here to pick up the pieces Smiley

Which is? And the other two?
Looks like deflation can be a precursor, which is just around the corner here...



259. Post 9866213 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: macsga on December 17, 2014, 12:18:24 PM
And it must be the final dump... Cool

Oh, great. Does that mean train pics incoming?



260. Post 9867489 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Am I sensing despair?



261. Post 9867798 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.39h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on December 17, 2014, 02:32:10 PM
Am I sensing despair?

Of course, people are losing money.

You miss the point. Despair -> capitulation



262. Post 10034254 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.43h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on January 04, 2015, 01:51:51 PM
flash crash imminent

i repeat

flash crash imminent



This.



263. Post 10034447 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.43h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 04, 2015, 02:08:04 PM
Where is Tim Draper and those Winklewoss guys when you need them?Huh?

They need to launch this SUCKER!!!!!!

I think they might be having a bad day.



264. Post 10034470 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.43h):

ShroomsKit, what are you going to do when the inevitable reversal happens (whether it's at $260 or $26)?



265. Post 10034733 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.43h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on January 04, 2015, 02:26:50 PM
ShroomsKit, what are you going to do when the inevitable reversal happens (whether it's at $260 or $26)?

Nothing? And how exactly is it inevitable?

It's inevitable because at some point the price of bitcoin will stop going down. Even if it's at $0.1. It's not that hard a question to understand, but never mind.



266. Post 10034814 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.43h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on January 04, 2015, 02:42:26 PM
ShroomsKit, what are you going to do when the inevitable reversal happens (whether it's at $260 or $26)?

Nothing? And how exactly is it inevitable?

It's inevitable because at some point the price of bitcoin will stop going down. Even if it's at $0.1. It's not that hard a question to understand, but never mind.

Huh? That doesn't answer my question at all.
I'm gonna assume you can't answer it then.

Sure. It was a real poser, after all.



267. Post 10035376 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.43h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on January 04, 2015, 03:00:52 PM
ShroomsKit, what are you going to do when the inevitable reversal happens (whether it's at $260 or $26)?

Nothing? And how exactly is it inevitable?

It's inevitable because at some point the price of bitcoin will stop going down. Even if it's at $0.1. It's not that hard a question to understand, but never mind.

Huh? That doesn't answer my question at all.
I'm gonna assume you can't answer it then.

Sure. It was a real poser, after all.

Still no answer?

What was the question again?



268. Post 10044619 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

Quote from: p4n on January 05, 2015, 10:33:06 AM
just saw this in the forum

https://blockchain.info/address/1L2JsXHPMYuAa9ugvHGLwkdstCPUDemNCf?offset=100&filter=0



18k bitcoins incoming to this address today

Presumably not Stamp? Or we're in for a world of pain.



269. Post 10070910 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

Quote from: Totscha on January 07, 2015, 03:56:44 PM
major exchange offline for a day and no big movements at other exchanges  Shocked
Minor exchange in Slovenia offlne for a day, Chinese short-term speculators do not care.  Tongue

I believe Bitstamp is in the UK now, isn't it?


They are from slovenia or something but operate in UK

They are legally registered in the UK. That's where their management and accounting offices are. The rest is still operated in Slovenia (servers, development, support, etc...). Specifically in the town of Kranj...

Happy?

Right. London 'based'  but their infrastructure is in Europe because there is no way that a London bank would ever let them operate. Slovenia, on the other hand, is more chilled out about Bitcoin.



270. Post 10071811 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

Quote from: criptix on January 07, 2015, 05:32:23 PM
Can someone launch a speculative cypher of how much money has bitstamp done in his history and in a standard month?

Jorge?

There is a thread in service discussion about it.
If you assume 10k btc volume per day it would be around 14.5 k btc from fees. But they will also have expenses over the year..

They also had VC funding, right? So probably insurance too.



271. Post 10093354 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.45h):

Quote from: diabLEEca on January 09, 2015, 04:19:03 PM
Or maybe they don't want the price to fall and that's why they wait until the banks are closed. People who want to withdraw their funds from the exchange fast will buy bitcoin because fiat wouldn't get transferred until Monday.

Very interesting idea.

This. And it is brilliant.

Well thank you, gentlemen. (。◕‿‿◕。)
To be honest, I don't even care that much anymore whether the price goes up or down but I'd really like it to start already.
Come on Bitstamp, launch the site or admit it's not happening but for God's sake don't keep everyone waiting for eternity.

It's not even that underhand... sort of. Standard trick for regular companies is to get news out while the markets are closed. Probably not a bad thing to prevent panic trading/withdrawals.



272. Post 10104286 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Quote from: 600watt on January 10, 2015, 03:28:36 PM
bam ! ignored

bam ! ignored

bam ! bam! bam !

forever f U doom trolls

keep on embarrassing yourself.

i may be delusional, but i fucking worked hard for being able to afford this. you are just scum, why else would you be here?

(dont answer, i got you all on ignore)

 Cool

Place got a lot better since I ignored shroomskit and lamb. Pointless repetition, worse than igorr.



273. Post 10175133 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.50h):

Quote from: GaliX on January 16, 2015, 01:20:33 PM
Yeah...

All that matters today is 200 holding

without great news? No way.

Something like a million coins changed hands over the frantic trading down to $150. Huge volumes. For it to go lower, presumably volumes would have to be higher still - and all the traders who thought they were getting the right price would have to change their minds.
If it happens, volume will need to be epic.



274. Post 10460938 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.58h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on February 14, 2015, 06:18:52 PM

OMFG I suppose I could post links to sites that celebrate human-equine intimacy but they'd be definitely NSFW.

Now why was it that camels are called "ships of the desert"?

 Grin

Any port in a storm?



275. Post 10502850 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.59h):

Quote from: WeltMaster on February 18, 2015, 05:03:32 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52644.msg635832#msg635832

Oh man

Brilliant!



276. Post 10668390 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 05, 2015, 01:08:43 PM
So how do we know that some whale or whales weren't planning on buying 50K coins or more on the open market and instead are buying them at auction? In other words, How do we know that this sale isn't already priced into the market? It's not like this auction is a surprise or anything.

Surely there are enough ways to buy off-exchange? Anyone with a lot of money would want to explore those before buying from Coinbase/Stamp wherever. I suppose the auction is the only sure way to get hold of a very large slab of coins at once, but buying on an exchange would be a last resort.



277. Post 10668530 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: Hazir on March 05, 2015, 02:11:22 PM
I am familiar with this auction. But I am not sure if this event is already over already? And I can tell you that auctions are pretty tricky. After all you can buy something not so cheap when there are strong competition going. So bitcoins obtained that way could be not so cheap...

Last time it was a blind auction. We don't know the winning bid even today. Though I'm thinking Tim Draper probably regrets it a little.



278. Post 10671125 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: oda.krell on March 05, 2015, 05:18:33 PM
Like I said yesterday, I'll start worrying about the trend since Jan if and when we fall and stay below 260/265, or dip below the DSMA20 without quickly recovering from it.

Unless something like that happens, I consider the most likely scenario that we're going through a repeat of the late February period, i.e. higher low, followed by consolidation, followed by continuation of uptrend.

That has been the pattern for a year or so
Drops then higher lows followed by a rise up then a drop again to a new low area before that pattern roughly repeats
Kind of curious though when that trendline will be broken

On the larger scale, sure. It's a bear market we're in, after all Cheesy But I'm talking about the January trend alone, so no new low (yet). And right now, I see more signs for consolidation + (upwards) continuation than reversal of the local trend from January.

At what point can the long-term downtrend be considered 'over'?



279. Post 10671946 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: oda.krell on March 05, 2015, 06:59:28 PM

Quote
At what point can the long-term downtrend be considered 'over'?

Depends who you ask, and what count they have in mind (if they use EW) Cheesy

Depends also on what is meant by "long term downtrend being over". The old downtrend could be over, but be replaced by another one, maybe less severe (i.e. a different downwards channel). Or it could end, but not be immediately followed by a much more bullish market either (i.e. bottom is in, but it's not rally time yet). There are several ways to look at it...

Anyway, I don't have a fixed target at which I would conclude with certainty that the bear market is over, or let's say, that target is so high, I wouldn't want to wait until we reach it before buying back. That target would be roughly: close above weekly SMA20, supported by volume, possibly followed by consolidation or minor retracement not further than the SMA, followed by a trend reaching for upper weekly BB (high 300s to 400).

Thanks. A little more technical than I was expecting, but still Smiley
@coinableS: what would your criteria be?



280. Post 10742238 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Where are the likes of TERA? I miss her realism. Would be nice to know how she sees the market now. And MatTheCat. Casualties of a bear market Sad



281. Post 10742410 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: gentlemand on March 11, 2015, 09:09:48 PM
Where are the likes of TERA? I miss her realism. Would be nice to know how she sees the market now. And MatTheCat. Casualties of a bear market Sad

Mr Thecat still pops up every now and then still. I'm not sure why he's worth listening to though.

Huh. Haven't seen him a while. He seemed to talk sense a lot of the time, though people didn't want to hear it. His problem was that he couldn't follow through on his own convictions. That and getting whipsawed once too often, that really seemed to finish him off.



282. Post 10751743 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: empowering on March 12, 2015, 05:00:34 PM

Also we are about to expand our neural cortex into the cloud, and increase the size of the neural cortex a thousand fold (and then again) there is no telling what will happen. The last time we did this as a species, we invented,  language, mathematics, agriculture, french, art, music etc etc...

The world is going to change more in the next 50 years than in the last 100-200, and in the next 100 years as much as in the past 500.

The only thing that will stop this is,  nuclear war, plague or heat death.



I'm pretty sure those qualify as 'change'...



283. Post 10752685 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: empowering on March 12, 2015, 06:11:09 PM
Oh my fucking god, I just found out Terry Pratchett died..

Fuck this day.

 Angry

 Sad



284. Post 10759730 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on March 13, 2015, 10:40:38 AM
Based on my time here roughly 99% of people posting charts have literally no idea what they are doing & it's more often than not just what they want to happen.
They then go ahead & make a bull shit chart to try & convince themselves it'll happen.

Who are the successful/professional traders here?
I'd like to interview a few for a series. Obviously 'I once made $100 in a bubble' doesn't count.



285. Post 10761102 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: Feri22 on March 13, 2015, 01:00:27 PM
Based on my time here roughly 99% of people posting charts have literally no idea what they are doing & it's more often than not just what they want to happen.
They then go ahead & make a bull shit chart to try & convince themselves it'll happen.

Who are the successful/professional traders here?
I'd like to interview a few for a series. Obviously 'I once made $100 in a bubble' doesn't count.
TERA, but he's not around anymore.

How do you know he or she was successfull trader?? I remember she or he was wrong many times, which i believe is the reason why she or he is not posting anymore

There is no such thing as a "successful" trader. There are traders who may go well one day and bad at another. Whoever claims for his/her error-less abilities he/she may as well claim the title of the bigger liar as well. I personally suck at trading. I must classify myself to the worst trader around; that's why I'm a perma-hodler ever since. Smiley

I am right there with you.  Just wanted to throw in S3052.  He has been doing BTC analysis for quite a while.

Yes, this i would even believe, because i was signed up for their setvice and i must say they were right almost always, really good results...but after some time i decided to stop using their service because i realized i am long term holder and trading was not for me

But if i should recommend someone, it would be probably S3052, but keep in mind that it's Bitcoin and NO ONE knows where the price will go with 100% certainity

Thanks for the suggestions. Yep, TERA is a she. She was consistently bearish, but as I remember mostly right. It was a bearish year and no one wanted to hear it. As I recall she found trading bitcoin pretty stressful though.



286. Post 10813204 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Jorge, I have to ask. What do you get out of being here? I mean, psychologically? What purpose does it serve for you?
You seem impervious to reasonable arguments against your points so feel free not to answer the question if it's too awkward.



287. Post 10823199 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on March 19, 2015, 02:16:44 PM
https://blogs.windows.com/bloggingwindows/2015/03/17/making-windows-10-more-personal-and-more-secure-with-windows-hello/

Yeah it's Windows, but this will be the future of security. Biometric wallets FTW.

"Windows Hello introduces system support for biometric authentication – using your face, iris, or fingerprint to unlock your devices – with technology that is much safer than traditional passwords"

Alohar!! http://www.techtimes.com/articles/34023/20150219/alohar-mobile-security-authentication.htm

(security is going to go beyond traditional biometric profiling ^^, for instance using machine learning to learn from the data collected by our devices and using that to build far more complex identification verification models from that data... going to be listening to our heartbeats eventually no doubt too, incidentally our phones will also turn into onboard doctors, as well as onboard policemen)

Very true. I remember reading somewhere about a device that was already able to monitor an individual's ECG waves as they are even more unique than fingerprints. This stuff is being created as we type.

What happens if you stop typing?

Yep, the ecg thing is being developed by a UK bank.



288. Post 10824385 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: inca on March 19, 2015, 05:07:20 PM

Until we break the log downtrend line we wont get a lot of technical traders jumping on board - that is when i consider us in a bull market (bitcoin style).

Where is that right now?



289. Post 10839664 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 21, 2015, 07:34:04 AM
Dear "Stolfi",

I have come across the page:

http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~stolfi/bitcoin/2014-02-17-HowToMakeSomeEasyMoney.html

It appears you formed the impression around February 2014 that bitcoin is a pyramid scheme. Since that date, however, you have thoroughly educated yourself on the technology, tacitly admitting that it constitutes an advance in CS and in economics. In any case, you no longer think being a pyramid is one of bitcoin's top six drawbacks.

The bitcoin prootocol was a promising solution to an old distributed computing problem, yes; and the blockchain started by Satoshi on 2009-01-03 was a technical experiment to test it, yes.  But the experiment revealed some serious problems, which were not clearly seen at the time, and still have no solution in sight.

Economically, as a "deflationary decentralized pseudonymous irreversible currency", bitcoin still makes no sense to me.

As an investment, I believe that it is fairly well illustrated by that money-making circle on my website.  The bitcoin system does not create any real wealth (food, homes, cars, boat rides, haircuts...)  Unlike the dividends and valuation of typical company stocks, any proft that one can make from bitcoin, wether by short-term trading or long-term "hodling", will be someone else's loss.

If bitcoin crashes, or never rises above the current levels, the losers will be obvious -- namely, all those who bought high and had to sell low, or will die holding the bag.  When an investor uses his sweat-earned 260 $ to increase his holdings by 1 BTC today, he is either giving that money to a Chinese miner, or is paying for a bottle of fine French wine on Risto's table, or a new pair of designer ties for the Winklevoss twins.

But even if bitcoin "goes to the moon",  the mansions and lamborghinis that the bitcoin holders will acquire, when they finally start spending their bitcoins, will not have been created by bitcoin.  By spending those tokens, the bitcoin holders will take real wealth from society, without giving any other real wealth in return.  In that case, the losers will be harder to pin down, because (as in my money-spinning circle) the loss will be diffuse and moving from hand to hand.  Still, the total loss of the "others" will be equal to the gain of the holders.

So, in either case, the economic effect of bitcoin will be the same as that of any pyramid or ponzi scheme: it will only transfer real wealth from the late adopters to the early adopters, without creating any real wealth by itself.

Ponzi schemes are usually planned and managed by one person, which is not the case of bitcoin; but that not an essential difference.  As some Indian economist aptly put it, "bitcoin is not a deliberate ponzi".

I believe that Satoshi did not intend bitcoin to be a pyramid scheme, and that it only became one a couple of years later, when other people started viewing (and pushing) it as a serious investment, rather than a computer experiment.   To the extent that people like Risto, Sielbert and the Winkles are still selling it as a way to get filthy rich without working, even with due risk warnings, it is still a pyramid scheme.

Quote
Would you consider removing HowToMakeSomeEasyMoney.html?

Of course not.

EDIT: Actually, whether bitcoin flops or goes to the moon, the losses of the losers will be much greater than the profits of the winners, because a huge amount of real wealth will be consumed by mining.   Thus, in that aspect, bitcoin is not just a ponzi, but an egregiously stupid kind of ponzi.

This is ridiculous.
Around half my income comes in the form of bitcoin payments for copywriting and communications work with clients around the world. Payments are typically $50-300 each. Without bitcoin, it would be utterly uneconomical to transfer those amounts through the traditional banking system. There's clear value there to me: the ability to access global work, without which this month I'd have trouble paying my mortgage and feeding my kids.
And yes, to pre-empt your next point, I do pay my mortgage in fiat. But I also keep some in bitcoin, because it's the best way of paying for goods and services globally, like the gigs on Fiverr I've been using to create material for communications campaigns using professionals around the world, and because the punitive bank rates make it smart to keep the money in the system rather than going via fiat. Some of those people, I imagine, will do the same, and some of them are only able to access the work I give them because I pay in bitcoin, rather than be extorted by a fiat transfer. Ever tried sending $5 across continents by fiat? A clue: Fiverr wouldn't be called Fiverr any more. And so the bitcoins go round, providing a useful and valuable service as a fast, cheap means of international currency transfer.
I love that you're so engaged and enthusiastic about proving bitcoin is a ponzi/scam/will never work, etc. Really. But while you're pontificating about why it can't work, you seem not to realise there are people like me who are able to pay the bills and create real value for other people because it does work.



290. Post 10841342 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: BlackSpidy on March 21, 2015, 01:16:21 PM
Hm... I dont know. I guess repeating "you're full of shit" would be a less classy way to say that... though you could say I'm curious to see what claim he will say counts as evidence/proof of what he said to be true.
Most of what he says in response can be summed up to "hard fork here, hard fork there, poof! Magic!", so I guess I should stop.

Forget it. Telling him this stuff is actually useful and proving it by using it in ways you can't use fiat doesn't convince him, because of theoretical issues that don't seem to cause real world problems...



291. Post 10868381 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Here's another bit of deduction that's even vaguely on topic. This is why I think satoshi's coins will never move: https://bitscan.com/articles/satoshis-millions-gone-for-good



292. Post 10893688 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

What are current amounts of borrowed money for longs/shorts? Is there a good place to find this for the whole market?
Weekly report time...



293. Post 10893796 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: chriswen on March 26, 2015, 04:11:09 PM
What are current amounts of borrowed money for longs/shorts? Is there a good place to find this for the whole market?
Weekly report time...

BFXData.

Currently 22k in BTC shorts and 24 million in longs.

Thanks. Interpretation? That's a lot more in longs unless I've misunderstood it.



294. Post 10896594 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on March 26, 2015, 09:28:21 PM
Would be interesting to send an e-mail to the real Jorge Stolfi and ask if this is his account. Most of "his" posts are designed to confuse. Rather than inform, which I thought was his aim.

It is a sad state of affairs, but I believe it is the real Jorge Stolfi. I can only imagine what his students think of him spending so many hours on these forums.



295. Post 10940134 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 31, 2015, 12:28:47 PM
There is no currency conversion cost when the demand for USD is greater than the demand for local currency (which is most common). The other trader eats that cost. happily. It's true that exchanging that large of an amount is problematic, so what is much more likely is that I'd exchange a smaller amount and get a discount on my vacation rather than a free trip. It's still a good deal, all things else being equal.

That may be a good deal for you, but bitcoiner tourists doing that will not be enough to support a "rebittance" business.

Moreover, their business will depress only the BTC:PHP price in the local market and exchanges, not the BTC:USD price.  Local arbitragers could buy cheap BTC with PHP and re-sell them locally (or to tourists) for USD, at a higher price; but they too will need to change the USD into PHP for continuing operation, which again runs into the conversion fee barrier.


If only it could be used to buy things globally, creating some kind of joined-up economy and demand that went beyond remittance.
Sigh. We've done this conversation before.

Edit: here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg10839664#msg10839664
You never did bother to give a proper reply.



296. Post 10940274 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: calme on March 31, 2015, 01:07:54 PM
why does it matter if it's over a sea or not? do they only like it if it's over land? do they think it will short circuit if it gets wet or what?

Yes. Also: foreigners.



297. Post 10940401 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: empowering on March 31, 2015, 01:18:34 PM
DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!???
Another serving of doom coming for you in a minute good Sir.


Wrong order!  we ordered the full on DOOOOOOOOOOOOM for the entire table.... not breadsticks.

You just cannot get the staff these days.


This is not shnappy

(eats a breadstick)

Not shnappy at all.  Angry Angry
 

What's with the doom orders?



298. Post 10940479 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: empowering on March 31, 2015, 01:30:03 PM
DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!???
Another serving of doom coming for you in a minute good Sir.


Wrong order!  we ordered the full on DOOOOOOOOOOOOM for the entire table.... not breadsticks.

You just cannot get the staff these days.


This is not shnappy

(eats a breadstick)

Not shnappy at all.  Angry Angry
 

What's with the doom orders?


I am just waiting for the staff to do their job, to live up to their many many promises, to deliver on what they promised in a timely and shnappy fashion.

Plus it will make my day, my year in fact.

My patience is growing thin.

I just wish they would get on with it and drop it.... drop it like they dropped Fat Man.




I can't tell whether you're short, or bear baiting, is all.



299. Post 10940748 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 31, 2015, 01:47:11 PM
If only it could be used to buy things globally, creating some kind of joined-up economy and demand that went beyond remittance.  Sigh. We've done this conversation before.

Edit: here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg10839664#msg10839664
You never did bother to give a proper reply.

What can I reply?  Bitcoin is working for some people, sure.  Will it ever grow to a significant slice of the economy?

Unfortunately, we have no idea of how many merchants (like you) really accept bitcoin, nor how much do they take by that route.  That, by the way, is one thing that must be keeping serious investors away: there is practically no meaningful data on the state of the bitcoin economy.

We must do with indirect hints.  Right now there there seem to be, worldwide, at most 200'000 merchants who "accept bitcoin" in the sense that they accept national currency from a bitcoin payment processor like BitPay.  BitPay seems to be processing about 1 million dollars of payments per day, but a large fraction of that seems to be miners paying bills.  There seem to be less than 700'000 people who own a significant amount of bitcoin.  Considering that, for a merchant, really accepting bitcoin is more complicated than signing up with BitPay, and that not every bitcoin owner uses it for purchases, I would think that the real bitcoin economy (excluding illegal trade) is still very small.  And we have no ideal of whether it is growing or shrinking.

Amounts of 30-50 dollars per purchase are fairly common in e-commerce using traditional means of payment.  Why do you say that they would be uneconomical in your case?

I wonder how much you would make if you also accepted payment through PayPal or some similat service.  Have you considered it?


I'm not a merchant. I get paid for lots of freelance jobs. And PayPal take an unnecessarily large slice of any transaction. I also dislike the way large players control the use of my money for their ends. Why can't money serve the same purpose to me and my clients, without involving a middleman?
Funny you mention friction. We have tools on the way that will make accepting crypto payments as easy as uploading a CSV of inventory. An off-the-peg site, just like that, global reach for merchants.
I simply don't get how you lack the vision, Jorge, to realise the potential of cryptocurrency. If you don't believe the trolls in here go and do some proper research. Just in my little corner of the cryptoverse, 180 new businesses signed up last month. Perhaps bitcoin will be replaced in the long term, though it seems to be doing just fine right now in terms of real infrastructure (forget trading). Cryptocurrency and blockchains are here to stay.



300. Post 10940780 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

@sitarow
Exactly.
Don't know what your charts mean, though Smiley



301. Post 10999569 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

I don't get it. Surely it would be better to have waited longer after Paycoin to release the next scam coin.



302. Post 10999598 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.09h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 06, 2015, 03:21:45 PM
I don't get it. Surely it would be better to have waited longer after Paycoin to release the next scam coin.

Not if you're dealing with idiots

Ah yes.



303. Post 11024984 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.10h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 08, 2015, 08:50:09 PM
Almost 27 millions longs

Almost an infinate money supply!

Finex user base is growing fast...
Wouldn't be surprised if we hit 30mil+ and nothing unexpected happens. I guess historical charts for longs/shorts aren't so useful now.

It's an indication of sentiment more than anything, right? So not entirely reliable. Like think what happens at the top of a bubble...



304. Post 11107169 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Quote from: Torque on April 16, 2015, 04:29:14 PM
Yeye m8, never underestimate power of chinese wash volume

Wtf m8, do you know what that even means or what you are saying?

We've long established he does not. Pleeeeeeasssssee stop quoting him.



305. Post 11124408 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 18, 2015, 10:04:20 AM
That 5k wall really looks mean  Smiley Who would put so much money on Coinbase? Their AML and KYC must have kill him - paperworks.

$1m+? Someone is serious.



306. Post 11125338 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Quote from: gotmilk_ on April 18, 2015, 11:45:14 AM
Suddenly Coinbase is bigger than Finex and Bitstamp Huh

I remember some weeks ago they had really low volume

No. Since they started charging fees they have lower volume than Bitstamp. Coinbase ask side (and bid if we take out that wall) is still very thin. Don't know why would anyone wire 1mil$ to the exchange with such low liquidity.

If I was sending $1m anywhere, I'd want it to be somewhere with at least a degree of regulation and in my home country, not somewhere like Stamp of Finex that might run into problems of some sort.



307. Post 11125531 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Quote from: Searing on April 18, 2015, 01:03:31 PM


what does everyone think of this? (outlook on price going down being a (kinda) good thing for bitcoin)

http://cointelegraph.com/news/113987/bitpay-reveals-the-good-reason-why-bitcoin-price-is-down

me..who knows but it gets eyeballs to their site I'd imagine



They're half right. Infrastructure has helped by giving people somewhere to spend coins. The bear market has given them a reasons to spend it. That is, the bear market wasn't caused by increased real-world spending, it helped prompt it (think why governments reduce interest rates/increase inflation - same principle).



308. Post 11125607 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.11h):

Quote from: SlowNinja on April 18, 2015, 01:14:42 PM


what does everyone think of this? (outlook on price going down being a (kinda) good thing for bitcoin)

http://cointelegraph.com/news/113987/bitpay-reveals-the-good-reason-why-bitcoin-price-is-down

me..who knows but it gets eyeballs to their site I'd imagine



They're half right. Infrastructure has helped by giving people somewhere to spend coins. The bear market has given them a reasons to spend it. That is, the bear market wasn't caused by increased real-world spending, it helped prompt it (think why governments reduce interest rates/increase inflation - same principle).

Seems self-evident. When the buying power of money keeps dropping, the most prudent thing to do is spend.

Yes. But neither IBT nor CT seem to realise this.



309. Post 11141658 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 20, 2015, 08:23:47 AM

The last price bubble was China adopting bitcoin; but then China effectively banned its use, so that bubble has been deflating since then.  The next price bubble must come from some demand even bigger than China's.  Russia is about to ban it, India does not seem interested, Africa and Latin America are unlikely to buy much.  Basically the only hope is "Wall Street" and/or IRA accounts.  But that depends on COIN being approved. 

If this is not on-topic for "Price movements & discussion", I don't know what is.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bitcoin-use-switches-investment-commodity-everyday-currency-new-data-reveals-1496316
'the top emerging country in 2014 was Brazil, with 406% merchant signup growth from the previous year'

Buyers may not be interested yet, but it's gratifying that Brazil is the BTC merchant growth capital of the world. Congratulations, Jorge.



310. Post 11160788 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: podyx on April 22, 2015, 06:36:24 AM
Nothing is more funny to a bull than the OKcoin bear that got margin called today for 31,000 BTC/3 million dollars. His wife is gonna kill him.



You need to have some guts to go 10x leverage with $3 mill tho, gotta give him that.

Does that mean he lost $3m?



311. Post 11160921 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 22, 2015, 07:12:37 AM
Nothing is more funny to a bull than the OKcoin bear that got margin called today for 31,000 BTC/3 million dollars. His wife is gonna kill him.



You need to have some guts to go 10x leverage with $3 mill tho, gotta give him that.

Does that mean he lost $3m?

Funny thing is, imagine all those who got all their low bids filled because of his margin call only to see it shoot up $10 a second later.

So it has the effect of clearing the order books in both directions?



312. Post 11163002 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

So what happened with the short squeeze guy? The market was pretty flat. Did his interest bill get too big or was a small movement up enough to get margin called?



313. Post 11164701 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Anyone else think it's suspicious that the Gox lawyer is called Kobayashi, just like in The Usual Suspects? Pretty sure no good can come of this.



314. Post 11165254 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 22, 2015, 04:33:58 PM
Anyone else think it's suspicious that the Gox lawyer is called Kobayashi, just like in The Usual Suspects? Pretty sure no good can come of this.
I was thinking of Kobayashi Maru.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobayashi_Maru

Kobayashi is a very common Japanese surname; I had a colleague with it.

Anyone finds it suspicious that the Coinbase CEO is Armstrong, like the first man to step on the moon?  Cheesy

Speaking of people who don't see jokes where they're obvious, here's something that's not funny at all: http://cointelegraph.com/news/114039/us-government-subpoenas-bitcointalk-pms-affecting-600-users



315. Post 11165676 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: Chef Ramsay on April 22, 2015, 05:15:55 PM
Anyone else think it's suspicious that the Gox lawyer is called Kobayashi, just like in The Usual Suspects? Pretty sure no good can come of this.
I was thinking of Kobayashi Maru.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobayashi_Maru

Kobayashi is a very common Japanese surname; I had a colleague with it.

Anyone finds it suspicious that the Coinbase CEO is Armstrong, like the first man to step on the moon?  Cheesy

Speaking of people who don't see jokes where they're obvious, here's something that's not funny at all: http://cointelegraph.com/news/114039/us-government-subpoenas-bitcointalk-pms-affecting-600-users
Which is a fraction of a fraction of less than 1% of users on this forum. Now if it read that the govt was wanting most or all pm data from around here, then there would be major cause for alarm.

You seriously don't get why it's not cool?



316. Post 11166137 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 22, 2015, 06:23:21 PM
Speaking of people who don't see jokes where they're obvious
Sorry for taking it at face value, but in other threads people have been posting far weirder theories, in all seriousness.  Cheesy

Well, you might have a point there.



317. Post 11177255 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: damiano on April 23, 2015, 08:35:37 PM
omg..

https://blockchain.info/charts/bitcoin-days-destroyed

Oh. Wow.
Any more details?



318. Post 11177417 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: damiano on April 23, 2015, 08:58:44 PM

https://blockchain.info/tx/97facbd7e07c4f3140d9ea167c2e54d85bc5f6fd04d9774d80b1284b706920ff


Im not sure where this is.  If it was an exchange I would think they would of swept the wallet, or am I wrong?

Odd. A small number of coins being moved out of very cold storage?

Edit: no, I was confused by the 101 transacted.



319. Post 11177472 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Click the ip. Gambling site?



320. Post 11177704 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

No, unspent outputs count in bdd.



321. Post 11180977 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: hdbuck on April 24, 2015, 08:06:12 AM

How many of these theoretical uber millionaires are there? who cant cash out because of the liquidity and the damage on the price before they could even get started very much unloading?



http://bitcoinrichlist.com/top100

Unfortunately, this list is fairly meaningless. A lot of large addresses will be exchange hot/cold wallets and other pooled funds, and a lot of large holders will split their coins across several addresses. Satoshi, for example, has ~1 million in 50 BTC addresses.



322. Post 11212238 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.12h):

Quote from: Elwar on April 27, 2015, 03:06:47 PM
That's some weird stuff going on at BTC-E




Shenanigans claim verified.




323. Post 11223575 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: stackoverflow on April 28, 2015, 03:17:18 PM
Dump failed

Starting to think $220 is to bears what $300 was to bulls

Kind of surprised

I think a lot of you forget that $220 or so is mining cost for a lot of operations. It would be surprising to me if we went lower for a long period of time. If you truly believe that is the case you should not be invested. Everyone remember how much hash rate dropped off the network in the Jan 15 drop to $166? If we had stayed at those levels and the hash stayed shut down there would have been major network problems for weeks. Block times/transaction times would have been a disaster. Watch the media coverage if that happens. It will not be good for anyone. Bear or Bull.

And before anyone argues that the Chinese miners have costs lower than that. ASIC development and deployment has slowed to a crawl compared to most of last year. If there really was money to be made in China wouldn't we be seeing huge farms coming online? It wouldn't take much to push the rest of the world out of mining if that were the case.

Actually difficulty/hashrate does not affect the working of the blockchain, difficulty is made artificially high when the hashrate rises to keep block time stable. The blockchain will move the same regardless of high or low hashrate (drastic drops in hashrate can cause high block time until it adjusts, but that's all).

This. You might get one long block, that's all though. Difficulty adjusts and you're back to 10 minute average. The network functioned just fine when hashrate was much lower. Personally I'd like to see less institutional mining anyway, so I won't cry if big miners have to switch off because they're not making ends meet.



324. Post 11223800 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: Wings1987 on April 28, 2015, 03:26:35 PM

This. You might get one long block, that's all though. Difficulty adjusts and you're back to 10 minute average. The network functioned just fine when hashrate was much lower. Personally I'd like to see less institutional mining anyway, so I won't cry if big miners have to switch off because they're not making ends meet.

You would have long block times until the next adjustment. The two week interval could turn into 3 or 4 easily. After the next adjustment things would be back to normal.

You are quite right, I'd forgotten it was calculated fortnightly or so. Yeah, that would be a pain, but presumably not everyone would turn off their miners at once. Even those who found it uneconomical to mine would wait for varying lengths of time before they pulled the plug, in case the price came back up. I guess the really big outfits might switch off immediately if their costs are really high, but I think some of those keep a proportion of BTC anyway.



325. Post 11223999 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 28, 2015, 03:53:03 PM
a BTC-e bot is buying 10BTC a minute for an hour.. Some weird shit is happening on this exchange..

Good.
Maybe somebody is sick of a year long bear dominated market.

Willy's cousin?



326. Post 11241056 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 30, 2015, 04:22:35 AM

Nice, but bitcoin is actually becoming less relevant to Circle's business, it would seem...

Suppose a person in the US sends USD throught Circle to a person in China who will receive CNY.  Circle does not necessarily have to use bitcoin for that.  If it has enough reserves at both ends, it only needs to adjust its own internal ledgers.  Like Western Union, or any bank. 

They need to send bitcoins, and sell them in the local markets, only if their reserves get too unbalanced.

Indeed, that was my guess for the reason for Coinbase and Circle getting so much VC investment: they intend to become competitors to PayPal in the "fiat" e-payment business, using bitcoin only occasionally if at all.

No. Not what the article implies.



327. Post 11243462 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 30, 2015, 11:11:47 AM
No. Not what the article implies.

Read the two quotes from the investors. They do not mention bitcoin nor crytocurrencies, intead they say "digital payments". 

Apart from the investment, the big news in the article is basically

Quote
And for the first time, we're giving Circle customers the ability to hold, send, and receive US dollars as well as bitcoin -- instantly, securely, and with no fees. In addition to sending and receiving dollars, customers can also enjoy the benefits of the Bitcoin network without the risk of price volatility. [ ... ] Customers with dollar accounts gain all of the benefits of digital currency -- instant, secure and free payments to anyone in the world -- without holding or explicitly converting dollars into bitcoins. [ ... ]  This way, customers can choose to view Bitcoin not as a new currency to replace the dollar, but as an Internet payment network that enables secure, instant, global and nearly free payments.

Ditto for the plans to service China:  since the Chinese merchants and services cannot quote their prices in bitcoins, Circle will be a way to convert bitcoins or dollars in the US to yuan in China.  Guess which of the two services may generate enough fees to repay 50 M$ of investment. (BitPay's bitcoin-to-dollar service processed ~160 M$ of payments in the whole of 2014, which may have generated 3--4 M$ of fee revenue at most.)

By the way, the article says

Quote
Dollar account balances held by Circle customers are FDIC-insured.

When Coinbase opened their exchange they too made this claim.  Somewhere in their FAQ, however, it was explained that Coinbase's bank account was FDIC insured against failure of the bank, for the standard 250'000 $ total.  They also claimed that they were licensed to operate in NY and CA, when in fact they just had assumed, erroneously, that they did not need licenses there; and that their BTC holdings were insured by a private company, when only the 5% max that they keep in their hot wallet was.

I wonder if Circle's statement above too is making full use of the wonderful flexibility of the English language?

I understood that they are approaching the problem of volatility in the same way as Coinapult, Cubits, etc, and I suspect many more in the coming months. That would make sense given the context.
I’m not a die-hard bitcoin believer who thinks it will go to $1 million and become the world’s no. 1 currency, and I can see lots of faults with bitcoin that may or may not be fixed. I can see the potential of it, and the potential of blockchain tech more generally. At least I keep an open mind. You have already made your mind up and filter everything through that decision. Which I find strange, for someone who is supposed to be a scientist. You are not remotely objective about this, which puts you in the same category as the ‘moon’ crowd.



328. Post 11244705 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

http://blog.circle.com/2015/04/29/new-circle-investors-new-us-dollar-account-features-china-horizons/

Reading Circle's announcement again, prompted by Jorge's relentless negativity, I think this is actually a bigger deal than I'd realised. Allowing customers to use bitcoin to send money but holding it in USD (which is what's going on, Jorge - instant conversion at the time of use) and never seeing BTC is very neat. They still pay merchants in BTC, but don't need to worry about holding BTC. I can see that it might be nice for merchants to do the same. That removes a major barrier to adoption.
Price-wise, since you seem to use that as a proxy for success, it becomes a matter of velocity at that point, as well as awareness. I wouldn't dismiss this one lightly. It's enabling bitcoin to be used as it was always meant to be.



329. Post 11245427 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 30, 2015, 03:42:49 PM
Allowing customers to use bitcoin to send money but holding it in USD (which is what's going on, Jorge - instant conversion at the time of use) and never seeing BTC is very neat. They still pay merchants in BTC, but don't need to worry about holding BTC. I can see that it might be nice for merchants to do the same. That removes a major barrier to adoption.

When you use their new service, they will take your USD, pretend to convert it to BTC, but keep the BTC as USD to avoid volatility losses, then pretend to convert the BTC back to USD, and deliver USD to the merchant.

That certainly removes the biggest barrier to bitcoin adoption -- which is bitcoin itself.

No. This is abundantly clearly not what they're doing. I can't tell any more if you mean it or are trolling, but it's rather silly.



330. Post 11245567 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 30, 2015, 04:29:28 PM
Allowing customers to use bitcoin to send money but holding it in USD (which is what's going on, Jorge - instant conversion at the time of use) and never seeing BTC is very neat. They still pay merchants in BTC, but don't need to worry about holding BTC. I can see that it might be nice for merchants to do the same. That removes a major barrier to adoption.

When you use their new service, they will take your USD, pretend to convert it to BTC, but keep the BTC as USD to avoid volatility losses, then pretend to convert the BTC back to USD, and deliver USD to the merchant.
How did you figure it out all this? Or do you suggest that's what YOU would do if you were willing to start a company that clearly supports BTC in the first place?  Undecided

Please ignore my cheap shot about "the main barrier", and tell me what is wrong with my description of Circle's new service.

Circle may have intended to be a bitcoin-centered company when it was created.  However, BitPay's numbers show that the market for fiat-to-bitcoin and bitcoin-to-fiat services is small and shrinking, and the chances of recovering the VC investment and making a profit out of them are slim.  Circle and Coinbase must have realized this a year ago already.   So Circle (and Coinbase) are adding fiat-to-fiat services, whose market is orders of magnitude larger -- perhaps using bitcoin internally, but only if and when it pays.  From the quotes in teh article, it is evident that GS and IDG are interested in Circle as a digital payment processor, not as a bitcoin exchange. 

In case someone is wondering, none of that 50 M$ will go into buying bitcoins.  VC investors do not give money to startups for the startups to play the market with it, or invest it in something else.  If GS wanted to invest in bitcoin, they would do it themselves.  Charlie Lee explained that himself when he was asked how many million would Coinbase invest in BTC.

Ok, I'll humour you.
What happens when a Circle customer wants to buy something over the web from a merchant who isn't a Circle user? Maybe they use BitPay, or another service, or they're happy accepting funds in bitcoins. Do they:
1) Send a cheque, and inform the merchant by email (followed by a phone call)
2) Make a SWIFT transfer
3) Bridge the gap in some other way?

Don't you also think a start-up company (the clue's in the phrase) might anticipate a growth in their chosen sector?



331. Post 11245687 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 30, 2015, 04:42:56 PM
Bitcoiners are the easiest troll bait ever

Yup. Think I'm done though.



332. Post 11245892 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Does bitpay accept USD? Does China?

Edit: this is so depressing. Someone else can tag in from here.



333. Post 11246343 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: gentlemand on April 30, 2015, 05:29:45 PM
Does bitpay accept USD? Does China?

Edit: this is so depressing. Someone else can tag in from here.

There is an enormous, beautiful world out there beyond your screen. Why not go out and dry hump it instead of wasting your life force on someone who will never, ever take a single character on board?

Every second you engage means he's depriving you of a moment you could be spending on something that enriches your life. Ignore and jump for joy.

You, sir, are quite right. Even if you have to resort to an image of a dog taking an interest in a larger lady to say it.

Jorge, you'll find out in your own time all your mistakes about crypto, and so will I. The stupid thing is, if you backed up your assumptions about Circle with any evidence, I'd probably give you a platform to discuss them. But you don't. Ciao.

Woof.



334. Post 11266099 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

This starts to explain the Schadenfreude. It's personal for Jorge.



335. Post 11266161 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: Count Chocula on May 02, 2015, 08:20:40 PM
This starts to explain the Schadenfreude. It's personal for Jorge.

Must admit, every time I stop by to see all the schaden, my heart nearly bursts with freude.
Is that so wrong?

Better to keep it as a guilty secret.



336. Post 11266343 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: Count Chocula on May 02, 2015, 08:38:29 PM
This starts to explain the Schadenfreude. It's personal for Jorge.

Must admit, every time I stop by to see all the schaden, my heart nearly bursts with freude.
Is that so wrong?

Better to keep it as a guilty secret.

Can't keep it in, gotta sing it, must dance!  
 ♫ ♩  ♬ Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah ♩ ♪ ♫



Join me, Cassius?


Better ask Jorge.



337. Post 11278519 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

https://bitscan.com/articles/bitcoin-economy-state-of-the-nation

Vaguely relevant to some of the drivel above.



338. Post 11279700 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

It's increasingly clear that Jorge's opposition to bitcoin is primarily emotional. He backs it up with some reasonable evidence, whilst ignoring clear evidence that doesn't fit his position. Call him on this and he won't answer you, or he'll just say that's why bitcoiners do too, so it's ok. He is not objective and not scientific, despite his credentials. Take his posts with a truckload of salt.
I'm not too worried about miners selling, since the block rewards are and were always meant to be a temporary situation to bootstrap the network. Speculators have run away with it too far, sure, but it's not a killer blow. I'm not even sure that it's a bad thing.

Looking at it another way, at the current price (call it an average of around $230 for 4 months now), people are investing $800,000 in the bitcoin network every day. That doesn't seem like a dead project to me. In fact, after 15 months of bear market, that's kind of promising, isn't it? (Jorge will tell you it's testimony to the greed and stupidity of bitcoiners, just to save him the time.)

@becoin You just made me wipe my screen.



339. Post 11279765 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: hmmkay on May 04, 2015, 10:08:49 AM
Stop engaging losers like him. Because that's what he is.

He may or may not be right about bitcoin's long-term survival. But yes, there is very little point in engaging with someone who simply ignores all the evidence against their position (whether they are pro or anti bitcoin). Jorge has given himself a decent self-education in a groundbreaking technology. Sadly, he has chosen to squander it instead of actively engaging with bitcoin or another protocol to create a successful system. The reasons are his own.



340. Post 11281321 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

I am staggered by the banality of the conclusion that capitalism is flawed.



341. Post 11309979 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Quote from: lay785 on May 07, 2015, 10:21:08 AM
Going to buy one of these I have decided and store coins with BIP38.

https://www.cryobit.co/cold-storage-products/cryo-card/
so what happens if you have a keylogger on your computer?



Create encrypted private key on air-gapped machine, copy via USB (or type manually).

1) Usb keys are known to be capable of having viruses on them even if they are not connected to the internet.
As far as I understand the infamous Stuxnet virus operated like that.

2) seems like a massive hassle to type things manually from an air-gapped machine.

3) In my opinion having such concerns kind of ruins the point of purchasing a special BTC hardware wallet. If you need the wallet and additionally need an air gapped machine you may as well just purchase a different hardware wallet that is less of a hassle eg. a trezor or a Case hardware wallet etc
I guess it may have the same result but I would pay more to have less steps to perform. a simple solution but a lighter wallet XD

Generate keys offline. Keep in head. Hodl.
It's the only way to fly.



342. Post 12088619 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 08, 2015, 06:54:43 PM





If you're using a brainwallet, move your coins - NOW!

Your passphrase is not as strong as you think it is.







I use a brainwallet.
Yes it is.



343. Post 13195733 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

The Craig Wright thing doesn't add up. There's supposed to be a tx of 1.1m BTC. Where is it on the blockchain and why are Satoshi's coins still where they always were?

https://bitscan.com/articles/something-about-the-new-satoshi-isnt-wright

I'm trying to find another explanation and the only ones I can come up with are
1) Someone else has 1m BTC
2) The doc is fake



344. Post 13195755 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: ImI on December 09, 2015, 03:53:35 PM
The Craig Wright thing doesn't add up. There's supposed to be a tx of 1.1m BTC. Where is it on the blockchain and why are Satoshi's coins still where they always were?

https://bitscan.com/articles/something-about-the-new-satoshi-isnt-wright

I'm trying to find another explanation and the only ones I can come up with are
1) Someone else has 1m BTC
2) The doc is fake

possible offline transaction. just hand over the key.

In which case, they were never 'transferred' and no control has been given up. Or, if they were moved afterwards, slowly, then who owns the 1m unmoved coins?!



345. Post 14828103 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 12, 2016, 12:02:11 AM

Down for 5% looks approximately like this:

BuyPrice   BTC_tobuy           $Amt_ToBuy

$423.00   0.20263425   $85.71
$426.00   0.20120724   $85.71
$429.00   0.19980020   $85.71
$432.00   0.19841270   $85.71
$435.00   0.19704433   $85.71
$438.00   0.19569472   $85.71
$441.00   0.19436346   $85.71
$443.00   0.19348597   $85.71
$444.50   0.19283304   $85.71
$446.00   0.19218450   $85.71
$447.50   0.19154030   $85.71
$449.00   0.19090041   $85.71


Up for 5% looks approximately like this:

SellPrice   BTC_toSell           $amt_toSell
      
$453.50   0.15750512   $71.43
$455.50   0.18817626   $85.71
$457.50   0.18735363   $85.71
$459.50   0.24871755   $114.29
$462.00   0.24737168   $114.29
$464.50   0.24604029   $114.29
$467.00   0.24472316   $114.29
$469.50   0.24342005   $114.29
$472.00   0.24213075   $114.29
$474.50   0.24085504   $114.29
$477.00   0.23959269   $114.29
$479.50   0.23834351   $114.29



$2.50 increments at $450 = 0.56%. I can only hope you have set your spread accordingly, or use a zero-fee exchange. And a bot. Otherwise that's a lot of monkey-clicking to give an exchange money.



346. Post 14831767 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 12, 2016, 06:26:18 PM

Down for 5% looks approximately like this:

BuyPrice   BTC_tobuy           $Amt_ToBuy

$423.00   0.20263425   $85.71
$426.00   0.20120724   $85.71
$429.00   0.19980020   $85.71
$432.00   0.19841270   $85.71
$435.00   0.19704433   $85.71
$438.00   0.19569472   $85.71
$441.00   0.19436346   $85.71
$443.00   0.19348597   $85.71
$444.50   0.19283304   $85.71
$446.00   0.19218450   $85.71
$447.50   0.19154030   $85.71
$449.00   0.19090041   $85.71


Up for 5% looks approximately like this:

SellPrice   BTC_toSell           $amt_toSell
      
$453.50   0.15750512   $71.43
$455.50   0.18817626   $85.71
$457.50   0.18735363   $85.71
$459.50   0.24871755   $114.29
$462.00   0.24737168   $114.29
$464.50   0.24604029   $114.29
$467.00   0.24472316   $114.29
$469.50   0.24342005   $114.29
$472.00   0.24213075   $114.29
$474.50   0.24085504   $114.29
$477.00   0.23959269   $114.29
$479.50   0.23834351   $114.29



$2.50 increments at $450 = 0.56%. I can only hope you have set your spread accordingly, or use a zero-fee exchange. And a bot. Otherwise that's a lot of monkey-clicking to give an exchange money.


I keep these kinds of charts to remind myself of my own buy/sell authorization limits, yet I will tweak from time to time.. and then change the next buy or sell amount based on the previous buy or sell that took place.. and some of the  projected numbers in my spreadsheet will self-adjust based on my own setting of framework parameters.  

Accordingly, my increments of buy and sell and the spread evolve over time.. as the market changes... So for example, last night before I went to sleep, I could not resist or wait until below $449 to buy, so instead I bought at $449.61, and reset my buy number from $449 to $448.50 and reset my sell number from $453.5 to $453.  I did not sell at $453 last night because I was sleeping when the price went to $454, and no big deal if I miss a few of the price swings... and many times when I am buying/selling manually, I set my bitcoin price alarm for larger price swings rather than the smaller ones (depending on how much I want to sleep, but last night I set the low at $446 and the high at $456, which maybe shows that I did not value my sleep too much, but it didn't go off).  

Currently, on the way down, my buy price increments are every $1.50 and then it goes to every $3 and further down it goes to every $6, and if the market moves fast I will skip a few of the price buy points and then buy several of the increments at once (and likely adjust the quantity that I buy based on if I believe the market might reverse or continue going down).  

On the way, up my sell price increments start at every $2 then goes to every $2.50 then to every $10.  Ultimately these buy/sell points are ballpark self-authorizations that give me pretty good guidelines for what to do and if the market moves a lot I am prepared.. or if I am out and about (with only my mobile phone on me), then I have a pretty good idea in my head about the ball park of what to do - i.e. when to buy/sell and approximately how much.

I have some BTC trading that involves zero fees (on Uphold) and I also have trading that has variable fees between .1% and .25% (mostly on BTCe, Gemini and Coinbase Exchange).  I also use Circle for some matters, Local Bitcoins, and the Blockchain wallet app for direct sales and other trading - and some of the various exchanges and accounts tend to be working on arbitrage opportunities, too.  Also, for example if someone pays me in BTC for a product or service or if I pay someone in BTC, then I will decide how to treat that and whether to convert to fiat or to replace with BTC right away.     When I use the services that have fees, then I have to adjust my buy/sell strategies a bit to adequately account for the fees - which usually I tend to require the price to move an additional .25% or so before I make my move, which currently is about $1.15

Even though you may be expressing some skepticism, Cassius, about my methodology and whether the profit is so insignificant that it is not worth the risk, yet in the end, my trading method has been profitable with a considerable level of consistency and maybe even foolproofness and has helped a lot to put my whole BTC holdings in a good position with more BTC accumulated overall in my various accounts, and more fiat stacked up in various accounts in the event that BTC prices go down (which seems nearly inevitable in bitcoinlandia that we are going to experience both ups and downs), and one of the riskiest aspects of my application of the theoretical trading practice has been when I tend to deviate from my pre-planned strategy and to attempt to anticipate the price too much and to attempt to sell on the way down or to buy on the way up...  these tend to be foolish and stressful events when I deviate from the pre-plan..  so in the end, I have found that it has been a lot safer to buy on the way down and to sell on the way up, within a sort of framework with limits.

Further, at any point, I can choose to NOT be so stressed out about trading small price swings, and I can can purposefully adjust my strategy to trade bigger price swings... It is totally up to me and my perception regarding how much time i want to spend trading smaller price swings or not.  Currently, I am finding trading smaller price swings to be very good practice, and I am pretty easily able to fit it into my other daily activities.







It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.



347. Post 14835411 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 12, 2016, 10:30:52 PM


It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.

You can call it whatever you want, including uncle bob, if you chose not to explain specifics, which had included applying practice to theory and also responding to issues/questions raised by someone else on a forum.

And, by the way, you are welcome.    Roll Eyes Tongue      Cheesy

Fine, if you want specifics: I use a Classical 1, 4, 9 MacNeill-Schumann hybrid for the main engine, sinewave recursion on the re-entry and a modified Gauss to calculate relative oscillation weight to maximise profits on the downside. I didn't bother stating this in my previous post because I knew you wouldn't understand it. Still 3 sentences though.



348. Post 14836618 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 13, 2016, 10:19:34 AM


It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.

You can call it whatever you want, including uncle bob, if you chose not to explain specifics, which had included applying practice to theory and also responding to issues/questions raised by someone else on a forum.

And, by the way, you are welcome.    Roll Eyes Tongue      Cheesy

Fine, if you want specifics: I use a Classical 1, 4, 9 MacNeill-Schumann hybrid for the main engine, sinewave recursion on the re-entry and a modified Gauss to calculate relative oscillation weight to maximise profits on the downside. I didn't bother stating this in my previous post because I knew you wouldn't understand it. Still 3 sentences though.

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of programming of a bot(s) to trade BTC, so I do not understand those terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment.

Furthermore, I do not understand how or if you may have tailored any of those referred to methodologies to achieve your own objectives in any kind of meaningful way or if you may have screwed them up or learned them over time through trial and error. 

More or less, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios.  You may have noticed that I am not a bot, even though you assert that you have been engaged in programming one or more bots, no?   

In any event, it doesn't really matter too much how many words I chose to use because that's within my discretion.

In your first post, you inquired regarding what I was doing, and you seemed to make a variety of incorrect assumptions and assertions.  I used my discretion and prerogatives, as a human, to attempt to respond to that.

Subsequently, I learned that you prefer to act a bit like a pretentious and self-righteous turd, and surely that is within your own discretion to determine your tone and your approach and to determine whether you want to explain your situation in terms of conclusions and abstractions, or to engage in any kind of meaningful attempt to explain with details what you are doing to the extent that anyone may be interested in your methodology, if it is actually true.

If you did not have such an asshole disposition, I might be curious to find out a bit more regarding what you are doing and your historical experiences, even though your practices, to the extent that any of it could be true seems to differ a bit from what I have been doing..  Furthermore, your choices regarding how you explain your supposed system seem to be a bit combative and annoying, so maybe it is not so interesting for me to ask for any more details than those sparse ones that you have already chosen to provide.


Yeah, it was gibberish. I was just making the point that I can say nothing in a single line, I don't need a wall of text. Supposed to be tongue-in-cheek, but whatever. Take it how you want.
I've been here roughly as long as you, though I only swing by occasionally and this kind of thing is why. I do wonder whether you have the insight to recognise how much your personality has changed in the last 2 years, and whether that ever concerns you.
Feel free to use as many words to reply as you like, I'm checking out again and I doubt anyone else will read them either.



349. Post 14877772 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: 0rganic on May 17, 2016, 04:02:43 PM
Feel free to buy that Eth scamcoin and have the rug instantly pulled out from under you.  They're pumping it in order to find momentum traders to dump on to get BTC for the BTC halving.  Only idiots hold altcoins during BTC halving.

It gets even worse for the ETH DAO investors, looks like your Eth investment is devalued upon price rise, this is going to end badly, so bad that... Dr Gavin Wood ETH chief scientist & DAO curator resigned , he know's whats coming  Undecided  https://medium.com/@gavofyork/why-ive-resigned-as-a-curator-of-the-dao-238528fbd447#.4b1m1viv3

Hrmm! automated ponzi, progress is the future lol.

Looks like a CMA move as much as anything. No one sane would want to be publicly associated with this. Seems like the vast majority of investors don't really understand what they've got themselves into.



350. Post 14879675 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: celebreze32 on May 17, 2016, 07:05:15 PM
Feel free to buy that Eth scamcoin and have the rug instantly pulled out from under you.  They're pumping it in order to find momentum traders to dump on to get BTC for the BTC halving.  Only idiots hold altcoins during BTC halving.

It gets even worse for the ETH DAO investors, looks like your Eth investment is devalued upon price rise, this is going to end badly, so bad that... Dr Gavin Wood ETH chief scientist & DAO curator resigned , he know's whats coming  Undecided  https://medium.com/@gavofyork/why-ive-resigned-as-a-curator-of-the-dao-238528fbd447#.4b1m1viv3

Hrmm! automated ponzi, progress is the future lol.

Looks like a CMA move as much as anything. No one sane would want to be publicly associated with this. Seems like the vast majority of investors don't really understand what they've got themselves into.

It reminds me of the Paycoin fiasco, and the obscene amount of money it raised when it began. I still wonder if the Bitcoin crash afterwards was partially due to cashing out all the Bitcoins raised through Paycoin. This DAO could make a similar ETH crash.

I think that might be a wider problem with ETH, at least in the medium term. Crowdfund vast amounts -> sell pressure. It seems to be a hazard of 2.0 projects that use the same token for network fuel as they do for money. Same happened to Nxt. It doesn't help that plenty of anon projects will use it as an exit scam.



351. Post 14885220 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on May 18, 2016, 09:11:06 AM
Even if you're playing the "greater fool" pump game with Eth, it's going to have the biggest implosion the world has ever seen on May 28th when the DAO holders start to dump ($130 million that will likely be reinvested in BTC)

 Grin

Yes, it is a nice quote isn't it.

Yes, you sure have a way with words to make a grown man smile  Wink

I don't see it going that far. Might even be happening now (I never can make sense of ETH). At some point very soon, a big holder is going to drop the hammer and giggle into his coffee he's beat everyone else to the dump, including DAO itself.



352. Post 14885469 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: kodtycoon on May 18, 2016, 09:52:48 AM
Ethereum is useless and broken from a technical and fundamental standpoint.  Everyone that knows anything about cryptocurrency knows this (don't take my word for it, read everyone's view):

http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1361602.0

Even if you're playing the "greater fool" pump game with Eth, it's going to have the biggest implosion the world has ever seen on May 28th when the DAO holders start to dump ($130 million that will likely be reinvested in BTC) while the BTC triangle converges upwards.  So the question is, since the single entity manipulator of Eth knows everybody else knows this, when does he pull the rug out from under you?  Will he wait a few days, or could it just come at any second?

i witnessed this happen to nxt first hand on a smaller scale obviously but same thing applies. agree with you fully.

Yep. It was brutal in Nxt. Right now, around one in every seven ETH is tied up in the DAO. Hmmm...



353. Post 14886933 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

^^^ ETH down, BTC up is the pattern.

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on May 18, 2016, 12:22:33 PM
ok, now bought that half back for 0.029 .. now this is what I call fun Smiley

Um, oops? Or are you expecting another surge/double top?



354. Post 14894815 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 19, 2016, 01:45:25 AM
i found a transaction that probably caused the bitcoin days destroyed spike. It was in block 412183. [...]

Interesting, thanks. That would suggest more people are withdrawing BTC than depositing at whichever exchange that is.
ya it kinda seems like an exchanges had to dip into their ultra cold storage.
if poeple are indeed starting to remove coins off the exchanges... well then  Cool

It's also possible it's a proof-of-reserves audit. I think that's happened a couple of times before.
Either way, 50m BTC days destroyed is a lot. Call it a generous 20m of background noise and 30m extra. If that really is from back in 2010 you're still looking at 15k BTC moving house.



355. Post 14897125 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on May 19, 2016, 08:04:46 AM
Sold 50% ETH back at 0.031.. let's see if it breaks through or forms a double top *crosses fingers for it breaking through*

Guess you called it after all Smiley Well played, sir.



356. Post 16192729 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on September 09, 2016, 04:05:57 AM
Weekly Stochastics have not been this low since F'ing June 2015!

800's is where its at. we'll be there shortly i think and kinda bounce around there until bitcoin inevitably dies and price crashes to 0.

What, I don't visit this thread in a few weeks and when I check in Adam is talking about bitcoin death and JJG is nowhere to be seen? Is it April 1?



357. Post 16340941 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: mymenace on September 21, 2016, 06:27:23 PM
lets see those walls


Based on the feds decision to hold rates

1) Confirms asset bubble to continue

2) No confidence in the US dollar

3) Gold, Silver and Bitcoin expected to rise

4) US dollar in free fall, base currency for trading countries down from 75% of world trade now at 45%

5) Yuan backed gold tipped to overtake US dollar as reserve currency for most nations and hasten US economic collapse

6) US debt $21 trillion dollars, 3.5 x larger than the GFC debt of 6 trillion dollars


not a pretty picture


SegWit is a not-particularly-pretty picture for bitcoin.

US economy is not a pretty picture for traditional economy, hence a source of buy pressure for bitcoin.
Neither is the prospect of a Trump presidency.
Or Article 50 being triggered early 2017.
Or China's Politburo changing over later next year.

So I know I want some BTC squirreled away for a rainy and possibly apocalyptic day, but I do wish they'd sort SegWit.



358. Post 16341472 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: DARKHOLDER on September 23, 2016, 03:30:59 PM
"I'm a simple man..." I see JJG spam like crazy... it means something must be happening... and btw... its 23 September. Cheesy Cheesy  Cheesy
what is so special in 23 sept?? Huh

I vaguely recall Craig Wright was supposed to pull some rabbit out of a hat today. I can't hold my breath much longer, really.



359. Post 16351621 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

11 hours between posts on the most popular thread on BCT. Does this mean bitcoin is dedded?



360. Post 16392853 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on September 28, 2016, 03:35:42 PM

Stolfi is a celeb now. He even has his own following, most of whom don't even know they're being trolled.

Ah, Stolfi. Thing about him was, he was totally sincere. Can't even remember what his arguments were really, but he really believed them.



361. Post 16422557 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Denker on October 01, 2016, 01:12:53 PM
the author of the wallstreet article mentioned above is not getting it. i mean we talk about DIGITAL stuff here. bitcoins are divisible, that is basic knowledge. do digital things exist that cannot be divided?


Quote
When it comes to wagering on online games such as poker, it becomes difficult to use them as a currency because it is difficult to break them down into smaller units that can be used as a wager

http://wall-street.com/bitcoins-slow-dominance-internet-good-thing/


Ouch!
That's indeed so embarrassing! However it says a lot about the qualification and competence that author is having regarding that topic.
Someone should make them aware how dumb that statement is.
The whole article is just again an attempt to present Bitcoin again in proper light!
But should we be surprised? This is Wall-Street talking! Cheesy


Also, it is possible for hackers to create bogus bitcoins! I never realised.



362. Post 16440642 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: yefi on October 02, 2016, 10:01:35 PM
im thinkin if this is true we may well read about it in the papers unless he's smart and keeps
his mouth shut. im sure mr tax man would be very interested indeed.

I would think if he's smart he'd declare it in his tax return, otherwise he's going to incur some difficulty in actually trying to spend that money, if indeed the deposit of a million pounds into his bank account doesn't automatically flag it to HMRC (it'll certainly get flagged under AML).

Yep, but it's not income. It's capital gains Smiley Much easier on the wallet when you're dealing with $$ millions



363. Post 16550475 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on October 13, 2016, 06:33:27 AM

STOLFI!!!! YOU BASTARD!!!!!!

Quote
After the initial application in June, the SEC set a 45-day period for comments. It received six — most infamously one from Bitcoin critic Jorge Stolfi in July. The Brazilian computer science academic referred to Bitcoin using terms like “ponzi” and “penny stock”.

http://bitcoinist.net/sec-decide-winklevoss-bitcoin-fund/

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

That's just hilarious. You've got to laugh.
Oh, Stolfi.



364. Post 16636352 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Elwar on October 21, 2016, 06:54:50 AM

Quote
While Gemini charges lower fees than many of its competitors and offers big discounts to clients moving large volumes, it's not free. (As an aside, the supposed free flow of money is one of the great myths of the Bitcoin world, since most exchanges charge around 5 percent of the value to either buy or sell Bitcoin.)

What world does this guy live in where most exchanges charge 5%?

Yep, that's pretty overpriced for trading fees. Factor in low liquidity on small exchanges and maybe. And, if you're moving currency around between countries too, then 5% is about right. I used to pay that when I cashed out to GBP from Stamp thanks to flat fees and appalling exchange rates from the banks. But yes, the guy clearly doesn't know what he's talking about.



365. Post 16745058 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: podyx on November 01, 2016, 04:06:26 PM
ShroomsKit, tarmi and fonzie will always have a place in my heart.

And Igorr. That big cuddly Russian bear with very poor English. I hope he has finally closed his short because otherwise the Russian mafia will be after him.



366. Post 16774972 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

^^^ I'm of the opinion that the simplest explanation is usually the best, and you shouldn't attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. Silk Road crash may have paved the way for a stellar rise, but the market was showing signs of wanting to go north anyway.



367. Post 16796628 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: TERA on November 06, 2016, 07:49:41 PM
It looks like there will be a rise in bitcoin since Hitlery is going to win this one with Florida (AGAIN! Roll Eyes ) begin the accusing state to doom the US for 4 more years of devious debauchery with another conniving (unt . Embarrassed
Other posters say Trump would rise Bitcoin. Which is it???

Also apparently every politician is Hitler. I've heard all of them called Hitler, including Trump, Obama and Bernie Sanders. Who is the real Hitler? Which one will gas 6,000,000 people?

If Adolf Hitler himself was elected, would Bitcoin rise or fall?

Trump's polling correlates very well against different asset classes, either positively (gold) or negatively (peso, stocks). It's not hard to guess how a Trump presidency would affect bitcoin.



368. Post 16801545 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: TERA on November 06, 2016, 10:15:26 PM
It looks like there will be a rise in bitcoin since Hitlery is going to win this one with Florida (AGAIN! Roll Eyes ) begin the accusing state to doom the US for 4 more years of devious debauchery with another conniving (unt . Embarrassed
Other posters say Trump would rise Bitcoin. Which is it???

Also apparently every politician is Hitler. I've heard all of them called Hitler, including Trump, Obama and Bernie Sanders. Who is the real Hitler? Which one will gas 6,000,000 people?

If Adolf Hitler himself was elected, would Bitcoin rise or fall?

Trump's polling correlates very well against different asset classes, either positively (gold) or negatively (peso, stocks). It's not hard to guess how a Trump presidency would affect bitcoin.
Bitcoin is not correlated with either one of these asset classes.

Pretty sure a Trump presidency would boost bitcoin. A small minority of people think of it as a safe haven asset for some odd reason. More significant are the traders who think that people treat it as a safe haven, and the traders who think those traders think people treat it as a safe haven... Keynesian Beauty Contest, like Cyprus in 2013.
Not sure if there would be an effect from CNY as traders use it as a proxy for a weaker dollar.



369. Post 16802200 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Searing on November 07, 2016, 11:01:03 AM
It looks like there will be a rise in bitcoin since Hitlery is going to win this one with Florida (AGAIN! Roll Eyes ) begin the accusing state to doom the US for 4 more years of devious debauchery with another conniving (unt . Embarrassed
Other posters say Trump would rise Bitcoin. Which is it???

Also apparently every politician is Hitler. I've heard all of them called Hitler, including Trump, Obama and Bernie Sanders. Who is the real Hitler? Which one will gas 6,000,000 people?

If Adolf Hitler himself was elected, would Bitcoin rise or fall?

Trump's polling correlates very well against different asset classes, either positively (gold) or negatively (peso, stocks). It's not hard to guess how a Trump presidency would affect bitcoin.
Bitcoin is not correlated with either one of these asset classes.

Pretty sure a Trump presidency would boost bitcoin. A small minority of people think of it as a safe haven asset for some odd reason. More significant are the traders who think that people treat it as a safe haven, and the traders who think those traders think people treat it as a safe haven... Keynesian Beauty Contest, like Cyprus in 2013.
Not sure if there would be an effect from CNY as traders use it as a proxy for a weaker dollar.


Actually ...with the election being over soon. No matter who wins 40% plus of the population is gonna be p/o'd at the winner. Thus I think after Tuesday BTC will pump regardless
for that reason. Don't envy the next president whoever he or she may be.

Frankly I'm not sure what I'm expecting from this election, politically or financially. At this point, nothing would surprise me, including the market shrugging a bit 'whatever'.



370. Post 16803535 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

I would never underestimate the will of the authorities to prolong that Wile-E-Coyote moment for as long as possible. However it does appear that monetary policy is reaching its limits, finally. Which means you either have to pull something really big/unexpected out of the bag (hear the distant sounds of helicopter rotors turning) or bite the bullet. As you say, markets don't do what you expect them to and I can't see how this will finish. My guess is it will be something almost no one saw coming, probably a complication caused by the desperate attempts to keep things going a while longer but one that remains very much in the background until it's too late.
I would want a few BTC hidden away for that day, though, and ideally very little debt.



371. Post 16804013 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Torque on November 07, 2016, 02:53:18 PM
I would never underestimate the will of the authorities to prolong that Wile-E-Coyote moment for as long as possible. However it does appear that monetary policy is reaching its limits, finally. Which means you either have to pull something really big/unexpected out of the bag (hear the distant sounds of helicopter rotors turning) or bite the bullet. As you say, markets don't do what you expect them to and I can't see how this will finish. My guess is it will be something almost no one saw coming, probably a complication caused by the desperate attempts to keep things going a while longer but one that remains very much in the background until it's too late.
I would want a few BTC hidden away for that day, though, and ideally very little debt.

If we assume that on a Clinton win that markets would rally, stabilize, and even possibly bull run early next year, then I can interpret that as only one thing: That Wall Street believes that she is more sympathetic to Wall Street, Banks, and the Fed, and what she would support when the equities/commodities market crash actually happens: MORE stimulus, MORE socialized losses, MORE interest rate suppression.... and MORE GOVT and CORP DEBT.

Which is exactly what we DON'T need more of.

I think that's a fair assessment. US interest rates are more likely to increase too.
And Sterling will get spanked some more as a result. Ah well.



372. Post 16804276 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Torque on November 07, 2016, 03:16:09 PM
I would never underestimate the will of the authorities to prolong that Wile-E-Coyote moment for as long as possible. However it does appear that monetary policy is reaching its limits, finally. Which means you either have to pull something really big/unexpected out of the bag (hear the distant sounds of helicopter rotors turning) or bite the bullet. As you say, markets don't do what you expect them to and I can't see how this will finish. My guess is it will be something almost no one saw coming, probably a complication caused by the desperate attempts to keep things going a while longer but one that remains very much in the background until it's too late.
I would want a few BTC hidden away for that day, though, and ideally very little debt.

If we assume that on a Clinton win that markets would rally, stabilize, and even possibly bull run early next year, then I can interpret that as only one thing: That Wall Street believes that she is more sympathetic to Wall Street, Banks, and the Fed, and what she would likely support when the equities/commodities market crash actually happens: MORE stimulus, MORE socialized losses, MORE interest rate suppression.... and MORE GOVT and CORP DEBT.

Which is exactly what we DON'T need more of.
If interest rates are suppressed, isn't that good for Bitcoin? I seem to remember a Bitcoin crash whenever interest rates were raised or spoken of being raised.

Sure, low interest rates are great for traders in any market, allowing cheap hot money (zero interest credit) to flow in and leverage up.  But this gives a very distorted reflection of true value interest in said markets (eg. sound long term investment vs. quick return), leading to overbought activity (bubble) in just about every market where cheap money flows.

Specifically in terms of bitcoin I don't know what to expect. Conventional wisdom suggests that if interest rates are higher then money will flow there from elsewhere, including bitcoin, though I find it hard to believe the impact will be that significant. Of more relevance might be the relatively weaker Yuan.



373. Post 16812021 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: sidhujag on November 08, 2016, 01:30:31 AM
Rasmussen polling accidentally releases report showing landslide Trump victory:



ooh boy we are in for a ride

It's a bit of an outlier...
Given the state of the majority of the polls, it will be a real surprise if Trump gets it now. (Of course, the polls and the election and the media and the markets are all rigged!)



374. Post 16814514 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: podyx on November 08, 2016, 02:58:36 PM
Does anybody know how elections affect the forex market? Does it bring big volatility?

I have open orders, not sure if I should close them or keep them open.


Markets are flat right now, waiting for more information. When more information materialises, there could be big movements. Trade accordingly.



375. Post 16819953 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: Cassius on November 08, 2016, 10:16:40 AM
Rasmussen polling accidentally releases report showing landslide Trump victory:



ooh boy we are in for a ride

It's a bit of an outlier...
Given the state of the majority of the polls, it will be a real surprise if Trump gets it now. (Of course, the polls and the election and the media and the markets are all rigged!)

Looks like I might need to get ready to stand corrected. Scary times.



376. Post 16821274 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: TERA on November 09, 2016, 08:08:10 AM
This move is based on US news and is 60% a USD move rather than a BTC move. It not time for ATH and trains yet.

Guess that answers our question from yesterday.



377. Post 16821281 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: yefi on November 09, 2016, 05:29:29 AM
Coinbase leading the other exchanges at ~$740 - a rare occasion.

It's almost as if the US is frantically buying BTC.



378. Post 16822395 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: TERA on November 09, 2016, 08:12:32 AM
This move is based on US news and is 60% a USD move rather than a BTC move. It not time for ATH and trains yet.

Guess that answers our question from yesterday.
I was thinking so hard about how the election would affect just Bitcoin, without even thinking of how it would affect the dollar.

Care to speculate what the Chinese response will be? Their currency just strengthened against the USD, but they're likely to be offically labelled currency manipulators in the near future (one of Trump's promises). I'm guessing this will push more CNY into BTC.



379. Post 17123876 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on December 08, 2016, 08:17:52 PM
When are we actually gonna pass ATH Jimbo?  

I wish I could see into the future. I'd break my anti-gambling rule and already be rich.  Cheesy

I guess the ATH depends on where you are. Americans need current prices to rise 66% to reach an ATH, while Canadians only need to rise less than 25%.

If I have to take a stab at it, I'd say some time in 2017 for us Canadians and sometime in 2017-8 for Americans. I'm not all that familiar with other currencies but I think the yuan might be quicker than the USD. As for the rupee, aren't they getting close? I don't even want to mention the Chilean peso.  Grin

If you're in India or Nigeria, you've already seen ATH Smiley
In terms of market cap, which I'd say is a fairer measure, I think we're there in USD too.



380. Post 17170059 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Will be interesting to see what Yellen does tomorrow. 0.25% rise expected, which will upset the Chinese and prompt further outflows of money using your favourite vehicle for avoiding capital controls. Question is whether it's priced in, or whether it will knock BTC decisively through resistance.



381. Post 17223646 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Yes, I've had the odd (entirely innocent) question about bigger blocks deleted. Think I was asking what the odds were for SegWit given current adoption. Not impressed but then, I never was with BCT. It just means there's even less reason to swing by.
I imagine this post will vanish too, so enjoy it while it lasts.



382. Post 17254586 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Kraken looks like it has some volume. Finex really doesn't show much.
Makes me wonder whether 1) this is a little unconvincing or 2) it hasn't even started yet.



383. Post 17261831 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Volume still seems a little low. Wonder what will happen when traders finally notice for real.



384. Post 17267026 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

So what happens over Christmas when there are several days banks are closed and traders can't deposit fiat but can deposit BTC? Selling becomes a lot easier than buying at that point. Is there a precedent for that pattern?

Edit: not conclusive.
https://bitcoincharts.com/charts/bitstampUSD#rg60zigHourlyzczsg2015-12-20zeg2016-01-05ztgSzm1g10zm2g25zv



385. Post 17285985 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: kurious on December 24, 2016, 11:59:29 AM
Huobi 30 bucks ahead.  But then it ain't Christmas there....

Western exchanges can't have a lot of fiat coming in right now.

I'm thinking the West will see some selling for that reason. Once the banks wake after Christmas it could get interesting.



386. Post 17325161 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: harrymmmm on December 28, 2016, 11:22:11 AM
Sincere question:

Do you believe the mathematics of fibonacci sequences has anything at all to do with the supply/demand bitcoin market intrinsically?

OR: Do you believe that many traders believe that, so the effect will be the same?

OR: something else?

If Fibonacci and TA works, it is because they are able to capture human valuation psychology.  Secondary to that, indeed traders might give temporarily give a sort of positive feedback loop when key resistance levels are broken, causing movements to be violent shortly after passing resistance levels.  Of course all of this is tempered by traders anticipating these patterns and frontrunning them, so the more mature a market is, the less I would expect these patterns to be relevant.

Yes. Fib sequences being able to encapsulate human behaviour is part of it - frankly I don't believe the effect is large. Smiley

I suspect the truth contains both effects. There are examples of systems like that where 'causes' and 'effects' are hard to label and are in some kind of equilibrium. Example: general relativity where masses tell space how to curve, and then space curvature tells masses how to move.

To a significant degree it's a self-fulfilling prophesy. It works because people think other people think it works, and anticipate how they will act.
Kind of wacky, but there it is.



387. Post 17334208 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on December 29, 2016, 04:27:27 AM

Wanna make $15k usd? Read white paper for syscoin and join us on slack at 12pm pst tom


I wipe my ass with $15K usd.... get the f-- outta here
Relax hero.. u dont like money thats fine. Im funding out of my own pocket.

I read Moby Dick for nothing once. For fifteen grand I'll read anything you want. I'll throw in my soul for free.

I read Dickens' Great Expectations at school, not once but many times. Frankly, I'd want $15k to read the back cover again.
Moby Dick is like a high-speed car chase by comparison.

So this isn't deemed off-topic, I'll opine that we are still moving up steadily at this point, with a saw-tooth rise/pull back, always higher than before. There's very little hint of FOMO, and not a sign of the 20-30% daily blowoff top that generally happens with a bubble. Which would mean we haven't really started the fun yet.



388. Post 17336042 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: pleaseexplainagain on December 29, 2016, 12:04:53 PM
There's very little hint of FOMO, and not a sign of the 20-30% daily blowoff top that generally happens with a bubble. Which would mean we haven't really started the fun yet.
[/i]

Going up from $850 to over $950 in a week seems to me to show just the opposite. that is there is lots of FOMO or at least very good manipulation of the price.


[/quote]

Um, not so much actually. 15% in a day, maybe. In a week that's just a little enthusiastic for bitcoin.



389. Post 17336664 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: DeathAngel on December 29, 2016, 01:40:46 PM
Excitement & interest building. I'm calling $1000 before New Year's Day.

Who's with me?



Yes, I think so. I don't see us sticking here long and it's just too close to $1k not to head up, just to see what it's like there.


Quote from: yefi on December 29, 2016, 01:49:20 PM
Disclosure i have over 20 yrs experience trading equities and forex. You get a feel for swings and movements.

The last guy I recall bragging about all his trading experience in Forex sold his coin for $150 and told us to re-buy at $30.

I have zero years of FX experience, so you should definitely listen to me.



390. Post 17345519 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: kurious on December 30, 2016, 11:35:50 AM
Is the fact that this is the last trading work day of the year a factor?

Do some accounts need settling, is it a good time to take profit and not hold over to 2017?

Actually, are there tax implications in the US? I vaguely remember that being a thing for the end of the calendar year.



391. Post 17391849 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: strawbs on January 04, 2017, 09:27:55 AM
This is crazy guys, this rise is parabolic. Don't you think it need to come back down and floor out.
Like how high can it possibly go before crashing? I think its now so I sold all my btc besides a few for investing with and I'll buyback in at $800 in a month from now.

Cheesy

Unless, of course, we never see $800 again  Shocked

That's very possible too but I think its likely to happen. What's your take?

This just feels so much like 2013.  Back then, "there had been an ATH of $266 which had hung around for a while, until the bull run which eventually broke through it and took us to the current ATH of $1175.  That was a rise in the ATH of 442%. If the current ATH were to break through this time, and rise by the same percentage, that would lead to a new ATH of $5194" [pasted from my post a few days ago].

On the other hand (even though I don't really think TA works too well with btc), we could be seeing a classic cup and handle pattern forming between Nov.2013 and now: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cupandhandle.asp  In which case, we could expect to see the price go up to c.$1175, then drop to between 30% and 50% of that ($587 to $820 ) as traders begin to doubt whether the ATH will be broken. Then a bounce back to beyond $1175.

In other words, I think it'll reach $1175, then it could go up or down  Tongue



What is the real ath, technically and psychologically? I guess Gox ath is the ultimate test, since coins did change hands at that price.



392. Post 17398042 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: practicaldreamer on January 04, 2017, 06:20:05 PM
any other UKers here holding their breath for ~$1230 when we finally hit £1000? that is gonna be when my head explodes.

Yep - one here Spooder. That would be fantastic.

The crazy thing is, I've tried to explain bitcoin to quite a few people over the last few years. Some have nodded approvingly - but most have been sceptical. But none that I know of have acquired any BTC. I'm watching this rise on my own (so to speak)

The one I'm waiting for is $1163 on stamp. And I'm starting to think I might see it before 23:59 GMT.

I have spent so much time watching the price over the festive period its embarassing.

Another one here.
Course, the way Sterling is behaving we'll get there if btc stays where it is  Smiley



393. Post 17398649 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: practicaldreamer on January 04, 2017, 06:20:05 PM
any other UKers here holding their breath for ~$1230 when we finally hit £1000? that is gonna be when my head explodes.

Yep - one here Spooder. That would be fantastic.

The crazy thing is, I've tried to explain bitcoin to quite a few people over the last few years. Some have nodded approvingly - but most have been sceptical. But none that I know of have acquired any BTC. I'm watching this rise on my own (so to speak)

The one I'm waiting for is $1163 on stamp. And I'm starting to think I might see it before 23:59 GMT.

I have spent so much time watching the price over the festive period its embarassing.

Where do you guys buy/sell BTC, by the way? I get paid monthly in bitcoin and since Circle shut down BTC sells I have to resort to Coinfloor. It's not bad but still a hassle and you get spanked on withdrawals, of course.



394. Post 17398754 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: machasm on January 04, 2017, 07:52:35 PM
any other UKers here holding their breath for ~$1230 when we finally hit £1000? that is gonna be when my head explodes.

Yep - one here Spooder. That would be fantastic.

The crazy thing is, I've tried to explain bitcoin to quite a few people over the last few years. Some have nodded approvingly - but most have been sceptical. But none that I know of have acquired any BTC. I'm watching this rise on my own (so to speak)

The one I'm waiting for is $1163 on stamp. And I'm starting to think I might see it before 23:59 GMT.

I have spent so much time watching the price over the festive period its embarassing.

Where do you guys buy/sell BTC, by the way? I get paid monthly in bitcoin and since Circle shut down BTC sells I have to resort to Coinfloor. It's not bad but still a hassle and you get spanked on withdrawals, of course.
You could try bitbargain.co.uk
Its not an exchange more of a market and the seller fee is a little high but the margins are generally quite high so compensates for that.
All depends how many you are trying to shift.
Otherwise you could use Kraken but the GBP volume there is quite low unless you convert to Euros.

Thanks. Looking for convenience and low fees really. Used to use Stamp but the bank fees and appalling FX rate was killing me. I've bought from bitbargain, three years ago as I was learning about BTC, but selling would be a hassle. Will look into Kraken but anywhere abroad will probably use SEPA, which incurs vast penalties. I've got a friend who uses LocalBitcoins, but I don't like the idea of waiting around and doing it all manually.
Basically the banking sector here sucks with regard to bitcoin.



395. Post 17398870 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 04, 2017, 07:59:37 PM
Thanks. Looking for convenience and low fees really. Used to use Stamp but the bank fees and appalling FX rate was killing me. I've bought from bitbargain, three years ago as I was learning about BTC, but selling would be a hassle. Will look into Kraken but anywhere abroad will probably use SEPA, which incurs vast penalties. I've got a friend who uses LocalBitcoins, but I don't like the idea of waiting around and doing it all manually.
Basically the banking sector here sucks with regard to bitcoin.

Try Bittylicious? I've no idea what it's like as a seller but they're superb to buy from. I'm not sure whether it's in any way automated but try asking them. You get a juicy premium too.

Bittylicious is excellent for buying. Same deal with selling as bitbargain, though - approval process and of course you have to wait around and make manual transfers.
Will probably stick with Coinfloor for now. They're not terrible, I was just spoiled by the convenience of Circle, sending coins and having them turn up as GBP, with no further action necessary on my part, practically zero slippage and no withdrawal fees. It was too good to be true. Banksters. The day of reckoning is nigh.



396. Post 17399184 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: practicaldreamer on January 04, 2017, 08:12:50 PM
any other UKers here holding their breath for ~$1230 when we finally hit £1000? that is gonna be when my head explodes.

Yep - one here Spooder. That would be fantastic.

The crazy thing is, I've tried to explain bitcoin to quite a few people over the last few years. Some have nodded approvingly - but most have been sceptical. But none that I know of have acquired any BTC. I'm watching this rise on my own (so to speak)

The one I'm waiting for is $1163 on stamp. And I'm starting to think I might see it before 23:59 GMT.

I have spent so much time watching the price over the festive period its embarassing.

Where do you guys buy/sell BTC, by the way? I get paid monthly in bitcoin and since Circle shut down BTC sells I have to resort to Coinfloor. It's not bad but still a hassle and you get spanked on withdrawals, of course.

I used both of those - Circle was OK. Not used Coinfloor for a while (and when I did it wasn't for long) - little liquidity.

Not sold for a while - tend to buy on Localbitcoin.

Have you tried Uphold - it used to be called Bitreserve ? As you are being paid in BTC it lets you hold your value (BTC) in various other assets ie. gold, platinum, $ etc.
Transfers out in GBP are no worse in fees than anywhere else IIRC
 

Interesting, will take a look. Basically I cash out to pay bills, so nothing fancy required. But even that's hard to come by in the UK...



397. Post 17405158 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: ft73 on January 05, 2017, 09:42:02 AM
So the question is if this is the big pullback some expected to happen, down to at least $960.
Or is this just a short pit stop for the whales to recharge batteries and then go full throttle to break ATH in USD?
Will be some interesting hours to watch if you ask me.

So you're expecting a single big pullback?
Unlikely imho.

What was the crash to $900 then?!

We're back to close on $1100 already. Volume of the drop was significant, but nothing like the preceding green candles, which dwarf anything in the previous week. TL;DR I'd want to see a lot more indication that the rally is running out of steam. We needed a pullback and there was something fishy about that correction, but it still serves a purpose.



398. Post 17406090 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on January 05, 2017, 10:53:46 AM
Crazy that a dump like that can alter the price in a space of minutes.

So i guess it's a good thing right? There are limited coins and always will be. If someone holds a large number and dumps their coins or a large amount of them they will be bought up by a big number of people therefore spreading the coins around and preventing another dump of these particular coins in one go.

So, (if that makes sense) am I right in saying the more of those sudden dumps we have is a good thing long term as it spreads btc around?

Please feel free to tell me I am typing pure horse shit if that's the case.

It's a truism that coins are accumulated when the price falls (by forward-thinking and wealthier investors) and distributed on a price rise (as those same investors reap the benefits of their risk-taking/foresight). So yes, likelihood is that the dump was caught by a bottom-fishing whale and the coins are now being sold on to multiple smaller traders.



399. Post 17407657 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Men who stare at charts: was that what you call a 'handle' on the cup? Smiley



400. Post 17410994 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Well, if history repeats itself, that was the equivalent of the Silk Road crash in October 2013.

"Amid Silk Road uncertainty, Bitcoin value drops over 20% in 3 hours". Sound familiar? Cheesy

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/10/amid-silk-road-uncertainty-bitcoin-value-drops-over-20-in-3-hours/



401. Post 17417094 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: kurious on January 06, 2017, 07:47:59 AM
He and a group of investors are making patents on btc as we speak. He claims in
2020 he will be allowed 1 mil btc trust. If so imho we are screwed if true. He hates all
 now. Press,us all for not believing it was Satoshi if he is him. He will flush the works imho.

If the 1/2% chance it is true he is Satoshi or the last living of the supposed 3 man group that
Made btc. He's the btc boogieman long shot nightmare. (Damn scared stuff)

No, you got it all wrong. I'm bloody Satoshi. Don't believe me? Well, I don't have to provide bloody evidence. Show me I'm not or I fucking walk. I don't give a shit! Show me or bullshit! Fuck off, fuck off, fuck off!

Jeeez - he says 'Fuck off' about 8 times in a row at one point.  He is a dislikeable, nasty man and his dissembling and avoidance of obvious questions (PGP key, proof of the coins being his etc.) AFTER he CLAIMED to be Satoshi is simply risible.

If that is Satoshi, I am Queen Elizabeth II.

I find it extremely hard to believe that Wright is Satoshi. Apart from failing to provide the proof he promised he would, his communication style is completely different to the Satoshi on the forums and email list. Wright is rambling and messy, if bright. Asking us to believe that the same person wrote his blog posts and did those interviews is like suggesting Charles Dickens would finish a book with 'lol kthxbye' or that JJG would write a haiku instead of a wall of text.
I also doubt whether those early 1m BTC will ever move. The long article in LRB fills out a lot of detail about Wright. It seems most likely to me that he was involved, perhaps tangentially, at the beginning, communicated with Kleiman (maybe Finney and others) at the beginning, but had no keys. Then he overplayed his hand and no one believes a word he says any more.



402. Post 17418323 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: starmman on January 06, 2017, 11:09:11 AM
Under the assumption that we are currently forming the handle of a three year cup and handle, how low would the price need to go and how low could it go?

A handle tends to be a drop of between 30% and 50% from the top of the cup rim (i.e. between $587 and $820)

I'd be happy with that range - I have a few buy orders scattered around those values already, as I'm usually caught napping during the surges...

Minus the ~$200 bottom of the cup. So ~$682-876. But really, I wouldn't expect anything too conventional here.



403. Post 17423143 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: practicaldreamer on January 06, 2017, 07:50:53 PM
What if its not being borrowed. What if I (or we) can put in $500mil - and this shot in the arm brings in another $20mil new money on the back of it. The $500mil is then liquidated - taking with it (lets say) $10 mil of the money that was put in extra on the crest of the wave.

$10mil in a week isn't bad going - even for someone with $500mil in the bank.

I think maybe that this is how this market is going - purely because the market cap is low.

Follow the log.

You can check shorts on Finex, right? Money is being borrowed to go long/short. Lots of money.



404. Post 17428281 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

The alts are a sea of red still. Traders are not yet moving funds back into them. Presumably they are in fiat waiting for the right entry point to go long btc.



405. Post 17449849 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

If it was a bubble, it was a pretty unimpressive one. A run-up, sure, but nothing spectacular by bitcoin standards. No double top. A crash that burned a good few traders but was underwhelming in the grand scheme of bubbliness. Whatever's going on here hasn't finished playing out by any stretch, and neither have the geopolitics driving it.



406. Post 17450404 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Miz4r on January 09, 2017, 12:34:43 PM
Maybe instead of being such a cultist and claiming that there is a anti-btc conspiracy by EtherAltCoinBanksterIlluminatiTrolls you should consider that you are just being delusional about this chinese pump that ended in a logical conclusion.

Maybe you want to zoom out the chart and see this has happened two more times since the bear market ended after September 2015. The first was after the push from $250 to $500, the second after a push from $440 to $790 and now again after a push from $750 to $1160. So far this is nothing but a normal correction you'd expect after such a quick increase, I think you may be having bearish delusions about what is pretty normal market behavior in a strong bull market. The Chinese market being more volatile in its moves than the western market is also nothing new to Bitcoin. I expect some weeks of consolidation between $850-$1000 before the rally continues, don't think this is done yet.

There was not the irrational exuberance of a bubble ($100k!!!) and we didn't pass the old ATH. The 'crash' hasn't been that severe. It was high-volume, so I'll want to see plenty of volume on the way up to keep me happy. But right now I'm not bearish. It seemed like more of a correction than a reversal.



407. Post 17452909 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

^^^
I know this is off-topic, but honestly, what possesses people to eat spam? Really?

To keep it on topic, I'll randomly speculate that there will be no major moves (< $100 a day) for a while.



408. Post 17459617 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Personally I wouldn't call that a bubble. It was just the market getting ahead of itself and then correcting. Price =/= value and at that point, price overtook value. Now it's back to arguably closer to where it should be.



409. Post 17470199 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: podyx on January 11, 2017, 12:00:48 PM
How did it drop so fast? Any news?

Jorge Stolfi has sold his stash of 1 million BTC that he mined from 2009-2011.



410. Post 17470358 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Well that got out of hand pretty fast.
Is China even awake?



411. Post 17470401 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: tabnloz on January 11, 2017, 12:23:48 PM
damn, just keeps falling.

speaking of falling, might see faaallllling back at this rate.

If you don't behave yourself igorr will appear with his favourite chart of the downtrend.



412. Post 17491233 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 13, 2017, 09:05:24 AM

OK, here's the funny thing. The central bank can bloviate all it wants. In the end the people have the power. (OK, it wasn't exercised in this recent India demonitization, but we should be ready for the next ((hint: it's coming to you)) ).

What do I mean? India was about 80% cash. Why would the people not just reply with 'fuck you - we'll just keep using these notes the same way we have been'. Nothing changes. 80% of all transactions continue being done in cash -- not recognized by the gubmint, but who the fuck gives a shit -- and Modi ( and his wall street financiers) get to stew over in the corner. I mean really -- for the people, what is the downside?

The problem is that you have to trust every other member of society to honour the value of that non-government-backed cash. It's like a massive game of Prisoners' Dilemma. Personally I wouldn't trust other people to maintain the value of my wealth (any more than I'd trust the government). Unless it has some sort of very widely recognised/intrinsic value, you're playing a very dangerous game.



413. Post 17492715 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 13, 2017, 09:48:17 AM

OK, here's the funny thing. The central bank can bloviate all it wants. In the end the people have the power. (OK, it wasn't exercised in this recent India demonitization, but we should be ready for the next ((hint: it's coming to you)) ).

What do I mean? India was about 80% cash. Why would the people not just reply with 'fuck you - we'll just keep using these notes the same way we have been'. Nothing changes. 80% of all transactions continue being done in cash -- not recognized by the gubmint, but who the fuck gives a shit -- and Modi ( and his wall street financiers) get to stew over in the corner. I mean really -- for the people, what is the downside?

The problem is that you have to trust every other member of society to honour the value of that non-government-backed cash. It's like a massive game of Prisoners' Dilemma. Personally I wouldn't trust other people to maintain the value of my wealth (any more than I'd trust the government). Unless it has some sort of very widely recognised/intrinsic value, you're playing a very dangerous game.


But aren't you already trusting the government to maintain the value of your cash?

The reality is that fiat money only has value because the government accepts it for taxes. Take that away and you are literally asking people to trade against pieces of paper. That works so long as there is confidence: if people agree something is money, it is money. But if people start suggesting the emperor is running around in the buff, it's going to fall apart pretty fast.
Of course, the emperor is running around in the buff and things are going to fall apart. It will just take a little longer whilst the government is able to enforce the value of fiat.



414. Post 17493334 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Tzupy on January 13, 2017, 01:24:43 PM
Quote
ZE Jiang(BTC.TOP): Huobi & BTCC stopped margin trading, OKc leverage only 1x, finally no more fake BTC generated by exchange

https://twitter.com/cnLedger/status/819808775032868865

Oh shit, after reading this and realizing the possible implications, I will have to be extra careful after opening a long... Planned to open one in a couple of hours... Roll Eyes

What possible implications exactly?


A possible 10x drop in Chinese volume, how do you think that would look? Bullish? Wink

So long as there's not been any fractional reserve shenanigans (which would, admittedly, surprise me but seems to have been the case from the reports so far) then this shouldn't make too much difference? Wash volume shouldn't move price, and ultimately if you can withdraw BTC and sell them elsewhere then price should take care of itself.



415. Post 17503351 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 14, 2017, 01:49:42 PM
Stop pretending that the present technology couldn't handle large blocks.

Stop pretending you know what you're talking about. There are hundreds of independent developers busy writing and testing code and weighing and discussing all the possible options. Out of that complicated process it was determined that Segwit is our best option right now and that large blocks (>4MB) are too risky for the stability and decentralized nature of the network at this point. After Segwit is deployed it will also be safer to increase the blocksize as Segwit also solves the quadratic scaling of hashed data. Hard forking now to larger blocks without first activating Segwit and solving quadratic hash scaling is just stupid and you'll also never get consensus for that. So why don't you stop complaining about Core and actually look and try to understand what it is they're doing? The divide in the community is purely based on ignorance and conspiracy thinking.

atm the divide between miners and devs are based on insults and broken promises. the code is out, but 3/4 of miners won't run it. what's the way forward?

This discussion used to annoy me a lot. But I'm increasingly minded that the market will sort it out. Ultimately, bitcoin will fit into whatever niche the market deems it suits best. I don't think it will ever (for many years) be irrelevant, but it will settle into the place it deserves.
Big blocks, small blocks, the market doesn't care. If there's an application that is required and bitcoin doesn't suit that, something else will take its place for that sector. Bitcoin as it stands will become whatever it is best suited for. My best guess at the moment is that it will be a store of value and currency of settlement between other protocols that are more specialised, thanks to its network effect and proven security.
There's a saying you get the politicians you deserve. I feel it's much the same for bitcoin.



416. Post 17505145 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: K~Ehleyr on January 14, 2017, 04:57:23 PM
Looks like these minor fluctuations are getting much tighter now, breakout must be soon.

But which way will it break??

I call UP!!!!  Grin

I do not like the falling volume.



417. Post 17505744 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on January 14, 2017, 06:11:56 PM
Looks like these minor fluctuations are getting much tighter now, breakout must be soon.

But which way will it break??

I call UP!!!!  Grin

I do not like the falling volume.


You gotta consider this trade volume matter in context, which means zooming out a bit to either weekly or 3 days.. you cannot really look only at daily volume or time intervals shorter than a few days in order to get a decent grasp of the situation... that's my thinking.

The mere fact that trade volume may decrease for a few days is not indicative that the price battle is over or that there is some kind of manipulation that is about to take place or major change in direction. 

A temporary drop in trade volume for a few days is merely an indication that some of the parties are regrouping.. which could take a few days and even trickle down for nearly a week before they resume the battle (in a more voluminous way).

I like falling volume, tells me a move is coming.

a bunch of longs appeared to have covered at 820-830
shorts seem unwilling to short at this level.

i'm thinking tonight we move above 830.


Maybe. The rising price/falling volume makes me a little nervous about which direction the next move will be.
Normally I wouldn't care too much but I get paid tomorrow for 3 months work and it's going to make a difference  Cheesy



418. Post 17506444 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: K~Ehleyr on January 14, 2017, 07:55:59 PM
we might have done it, we have finally stabilized bitcoin!

LOL isn't that a bit like saying Elton John's turned straight because he hasn't shagged a man for two days?  Cheesy Cheesy

Why did that specific analogy spring to mind?!

I guess I just have a talent for weird, random but astute analogies  Grin

Well thanks for the mental picture.
I think the 800s will be sticky all the same.



419. Post 17530628 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Press will be interested again on ATH. Then they will talk about volatility instead.



420. Post 17531319 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Yves_Oluchione on January 17, 2017, 11:22:57 AM
My friends
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-speech-live-theresa-may-single-market-customs-union-latest-updates-a7530671.html
Maybe the rise is linked partially Wink

Brexit is just one of the many pieces of the picture behind the fundamentals. Trump presidency, US interest rate rises, Italy's banking sector, popular sentiment across Europe, China's economy, currency wars and reorganisation of Politburo Standing Committee later this year...
There's a lot, really.



421. Post 17563312 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Stevenirving on January 20, 2017, 09:28:37 AM
Trump inauguration bull run is coming today. All those people thinking its the end of the world and all that good stuff once chaos ensues in DC
Ready to cash out at 1000

Hrrrm, not sure. He and Yellen are at odds. I can see it going either way.



422. Post 17573249 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: criptix on January 21, 2017, 03:24:18 AM
A cryptocurrency which is fully controlled by a nation state is just a national currency.
And banks do the job good and cheap enough for fiat transfers.

There wont be any chinacoin...

There will, and it's a terrifying idea in the hands of a country that is perfectly at home practising wide-scale internet surveillance and censorship.



423. Post 17574601 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: becoin on January 21, 2017, 09:47:02 AM
A cryptocurrency which is fully controlled by a nation state is just a national currency.
And banks do the job good and cheap enough for fiat transfers.

There wont be any chinacoin...

There will, and it's a terrifying idea in the hands of a country that is perfectly at home practising wide-scale internet surveillance and censorship.

All major countries are practicing wide-scale internet surveillance and censorship at home!

China is a league apart in its interventions.



424. Post 17641466 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: abz99 on January 27, 2017, 12:48:09 PM
According to Arthur Hayes, Co-Founder & CEO, BitMEX

selling pressure will continue until mid-February, until if one of these three following black swan events transpire before the expiry of March 2017 futures:

   1. The PBOC aggressively devalues the Yuan

    2. Marine Le Pineapple Pen is polling well in French elections

    3. Trump passes a massive infrastructure spending bill

source: BitMEX Crypto Trader Digest Jan 27, 2017

I would be shocked if even one of these occurred.
SHOCKED I tell you.

Odds of all three together are pretty substantial.



425. Post 17710161 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: gembitz on February 02, 2017, 05:20:24 PM
Come on...1024...

you know you guys want it


^bitcoin price on autopilot ~ $2000 (2mb) is inkoming   Grin   ~gentlemen

2mb? No! 1mb or Unlimited!



426. Post 17751982 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

What will be the mechanism by which BTC move in and out of the ETF into the real bitcoin world and vice versa?
I'm assuming there will be some, and it won't effectively be a finite amount of BTC locked in the ETF, all of which happen to belong to the Winklevii. But I have my doubts as to whether that mechanism will be easy to use or arb, somehow.
Also, I hope their security is really, really good, because I don't want to die just yet, even if it is from laughing.



427. Post 17766357 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: DonQuijote on February 07, 2017, 01:42:31 PM
Looks like bitcoin might surge upwards.

$1337 target  Cool
Why 1337 $ ??
For me will be a little lower than 1100

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet
1337 hax0r ur not



428. Post 17766851 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Denker on February 07, 2017, 02:34:20 PM
Why 1337 $ ??
For me will be a little lower than 1100

what matters is to top the previous high.

Getting over the previous gox high of $1242 is what matters.

That was the Mt.Gox ATH right?!
I don't this is relevant.
People will look for the Bitstamp and Bitfinex ATH.Only these count!
So far there is still some way to go (actual price is ~1050). Really curious if we can break it this time.

I'm of the mindset that we've been above this level quite recently, and there's something magnetic about those milestones - people just want to see them reached, just like when we hit $990 I was pretty sure we'd see $1k. Up or down in the medium-term, I'm expecting $1,100+ to come around first just because it's there.



429. Post 17768481 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Biodom on February 07, 2017, 04:04:54 PM
Why 1337 $ ??
For me will be a little lower than 1100

what matters is to top the previous high.

Getting over the previous gox high of $1242 is what matters.

^^^ irrelevant number due to insolvancy. Only $1165 Bitstamp matters.

Have to disagree. Technically, maybe. But mainstream media won't report that 'Bitcoin has risen above its ATH, where ATH means the Stamp high because the Gox high does count because there was this bot called Willy and...'

You're crediting them with a level of diligence they won't exercise. News will only come on $1,243.



430. Post 17770531 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 07, 2017, 07:19:27 PM
Why 1337 $ ??
For me will be a little lower than 1100

what matters is to top the previous high.

Getting over the previous gox high of $1242 is what matters.

^^^ irrelevant number due to insolvancy. Only $1165 Bitstamp matters.

Have to disagree. Technically, maybe. But mainstream media won't report that 'Bitcoin has risen above its ATH, where ATH means the Stamp high because the Gox high does count because there was this bot called Willy and...'

You're crediting them with a level of diligence they won't exercise. News will only come on $1,243.


Who gives a ratt's ass about mainstream media?  Apparently, you do Cassius, and yeah maybe a few other folks who have their tin foil hats tuned to the wrong frequencies.

Yeah, we have to account for various renditions, framings, emphasis and attention of mainstream media, but accounting for their bullshit does not mean that we let them define BTC fundamentals or more realistic BTC measurements and indicators..

So, in this regard, since when are we allowing FUD to define BTC fundamentals?  Oh yeah, trolls and detractors like to do that.  I almost forgot.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



This is why I usually have you on ignore.
It's very simple. Mainstream media attention brings new people and therefore new money. That seems pretty fundamental for adoption to me. It's the difference between $1241 and $1243. Sorry you don't grasp this.



431. Post 17771063 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 07, 2017, 09:21:09 PM
Why 1337 $ ??
For me will be a little lower than 1100

what matters is to top the previous high.

Getting over the previous gox high of $1242 is what matters.

^^^ irrelevant number due to insolvancy. Only $1165 Bitstamp matters.

Have to disagree. Technically, maybe. But mainstream media won't report that 'Bitcoin has risen above its ATH, where ATH means the Stamp high because the Gox high does count because there was this bot called Willy and...'

You're crediting them with a level of diligence they won't exercise. News will only come on $1,243.


Who gives a ratt's ass about mainstream media?  Apparently, you do Cassius, and yeah maybe a few other folks who have their tin foil hats tuned to the wrong frequencies.

Yeah, we have to account for various renditions, framings, emphasis and attention of mainstream media, but accounting for their bullshit does not mean that we let them define BTC fundamentals or more realistic BTC measurements and indicators..

So, in this regard, since when are we allowing FUD to define BTC fundamentals?  Oh yeah, trolls and detractors like to do that.  I almost forgot.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



This is why I usually have you on ignore.
It's very simple. Mainstream media attention brings new people and therefore new money. That seems pretty fundamental for adoption to me. It's the difference between $1241 and $1243. Sorry you don't grasp this.


It is called having a different opinion about the weight of mainstream media and the concept of "mass adoption", and you can keep others on ignore all you want and spout out your pie in the sky theories that may only tangentially be connected with reality that maybe every once in a while may come true (coincidentally  more than anything).

It does not make anyone a bad person when they engage on these kinds of topics or have differing opinions.

Regarding mass adoption... get the fuck out of here.   I know that a lot of folks talk about this, and sure bitcoin is becoming more and more well known and more and more adopted around the world, but we should have discovered quite a while ago that this talking point is not driving BTC prices in a direct way and there are much better ways to discuss the adoption issues.... including talking about the various network effect that exist and continue to exist and are expanding on an ongoing basis.

What the fuck is mass adoption, anyhow?    Yeah, it is going to come, but it is quite a long way out there...

What do we currently have in bitcoin?  less than .01% of the world's population in bitcoin in some kind of way?  i understand that there are a lot of measurements in bitcoin to attempt to guage expansion, but mass adoption? that talking point is so 2014... hahahaha Cheesy

In other words, bitcoin does not need to experience "mass adoption" in order to be successful or to have various additional exponential price growth periods - even if "mass adoption" can and likely does contribute to ongoing upwards price pressures, it is not a controlling or even as much of a necessary factor as you seem to be asserting.. because we are way the fuck out from even being close to achieving anything near "mass adoption"  in bitcoinlandia.

I put you on ignore because you rarely if ever say anything coherent, lack the capacity to understand nuance and have become progressively unpleasant in the 3 years you've been active here. It's sad, but there it is.



432. Post 17771229 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 07, 2017, 09:36:52 PM
Why 1337 $ ??
For me will be a little lower than 1100

what matters is to top the previous high.

Getting over the previous gox high of $1242 is what matters.

^^^ irrelevant number due to insolvancy. Only $1165 Bitstamp matters.

Have to disagree. Technically, maybe. But mainstream media won't report that 'Bitcoin has risen above its ATH, where ATH means the Stamp high because the Gox high does count because there was this bot called Willy and...'

You're crediting them with a level of diligence they won't exercise. News will only come on $1,243.


Who gives a ratt's ass about mainstream media?  Apparently, you do Cassius, and yeah maybe a few other folks who have their tin foil hats tuned to the wrong frequencies.

Yeah, we have to account for various renditions, framings, emphasis and attention of mainstream media, but accounting for their bullshit does not mean that we let them define BTC fundamentals or more realistic BTC measurements and indicators..

So, in this regard, since when are we allowing FUD to define BTC fundamentals?  Oh yeah, trolls and detractors like to do that.  I almost forgot.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



This is why I usually have you on ignore.
It's very simple. Mainstream media attention brings new people and therefore new money. That seems pretty fundamental for adoption to me. It's the difference between $1241 and $1243. Sorry you don't grasp this.


It is called having a different opinion about the weight of mainstream media and the concept of "mass adoption", and you can keep others on ignore all you want and spout out your pie in the sky theories that may only tangentially be connected with reality that maybe every once in a while may come true (coincidentally  more than anything).

It does not make anyone a bad person when they engage on these kinds of topics or have differing opinions.

Regarding mass adoption... get the fuck out of here.   I know that a lot of folks talk about this, and sure bitcoin is becoming more and more well known and more and more adopted around the world, but we should have discovered quite a while ago that this talking point is not driving BTC prices in a direct way and there are much better ways to discuss the adoption issues.... including talking about the various network effect that exist and continue to exist and are expanding on an ongoing basis.

What the fuck is mass adoption, anyhow?    Yeah, it is going to come, but it is quite a long way out there...

What do we currently have in bitcoin?  less than .01% of the world's population in bitcoin in some kind of way?  i understand that there are a lot of measurements in bitcoin to attempt to guage expansion, but mass adoption? that talking point is so 2014... hahahaha Cheesy

In other words, bitcoin does not need to experience "mass adoption" in order to be successful or to have various additional exponential price growth periods - even if "mass adoption" can and likely does contribute to ongoing upwards price pressures, it is not a controlling or even as much of a necessary factor as you seem to be asserting.. because we are way the fuck out from even being close to achieving anything near "mass adoption"  in bitcoinlandia.

I put you on ignore because you rarely if ever say anything coherent, lack the capacity to understand nuance and have become progressively unpleasant in the 3 years you've been active here. It's sad, but there it is.

Do what you like.. but it seems that we have had several exchanges where I attempt to get you to address substance, and you get all wrapped up in personal bullshit, or avoidance or diversion. 

So, either way.  You can ignore my posts if you like or attempt to engage, but it seems that it is becoming much more apparent that you may be having some difficulties grappling with actual substance - that is why you tend to either focus on personal attacks and/or labelling my various substantive points as "incoherent."

 I will continue to comment on your posts to the extent that I may consider any potential utility for such comments... and it is up to you whether to respond or not.   

I don't think you're intentionally trolling, though bct has not done your personality any favours for sure. So I'll try one more time. Forget mass adoption. Shorthand is useful when typing on a smartphone. Think greater adoption, a prerequisite of which is people actually knowing about bitcoin. New people, outside of the message boards which are a really very small part of the world.
The reality is that journos will only prick up their ears and publish a story at the Gox ath. Then more people will read about it and a proportion will be interested enough to look into it more. This is how lots of people come to bitcoin and new things in general.
It's such a simple progression. Exposure equals greater user base. I really don't see what's so difficult or controversial about that.



433. Post 17779950 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: fff13 on February 08, 2017, 03:18:27 PM
It seems they're trying everything to keep it from rising past its ATH.

I wouldn't go that far just yet. Today's fall wasn't as colossally dumpy as last time's 24h trip from $1166 to $840. Let's wait until PBoC tax exchanges on 110% of profits first.



434. Post 17790509 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: d5000 on February 09, 2017, 01:46:27 PM
So... how low will this go?
My guess is it wont dip beneath 900. After that a large move up.

My guess is ~850ish. That is approximately the bottom line of the current mid-term uptrend (not the accelerated recovery uptrend we saw since January).

We are pretty lucky that we know now that the Chinese exchanges had less market share than we thought a month ago. So the PBOC actually (probably unintentionally) could help to stabilize the price, because even a complete "Chexit" would not mean the end of Bitcoin.

@molecular: It's quite understandable -- most of the dumpers would like to withdraw CNY now if BTC is not possible ...

It's like Gox, only in reverse. You can only get fiat out.
As a result, CNY will see a very small rise in value today, just like Gox traded BTC at a premium Smiley



435. Post 17790951 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: abercrombie on February 09, 2017, 02:21:15 PM
isn't coins being trapped in China good?  less liquidity?  we'll be trading with less of a pool of Bitcoins.

anyhow...

is crypto done??  Huh

They are trapped due to AML requirements, so the only way they can 'escape' is to convert themselves to fiat and leave via the front door in full view of the authorities.
Someone will buy them, being prepared to wait a month to withdraw them, but they will obviously want a heavy discount for their patience.



436. Post 17791223 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: ImI on February 09, 2017, 02:37:41 PM
Still the effect of real news is not bigger than the January fall to $800 and lower that happened for no concrete reason, at least until now

I guess the chinese are getting less power in the price, what their next move will be?

Next step would obv be to close a small exchange. Then, after several smaller ones, proceed with the bigger ones.

Then go after the miners. Then go after every retailer that accepts BTC.

Going after miners will be tougher, at least the small ones. And I understand that there isn't much of a 'real' bitcoin economy in China. Few merchants accept it as payment. It's mostly used by speculators.



437. Post 17791349 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on February 09, 2017, 02:47:33 PM
I'm actually not enjoying this price drop. It's beginning to hurt my eyes seeing these numbers.

Today started so well and looked so bullish. It just shows btc hasn't grown up fully and can be battered at any moment. This will not help ETF

Meh. Blame PBoC for this one. Blame Stolfi for the ETF Smiley



438. Post 17801080 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

So I'm quite staggered at the lack of panic selling. Ok, we had a $100 drop, which wasn't great, but why isn't it more?
It suggests that there are plenty of Chinese speculators who are 1) Happy to pick up BTC and LTC and let them sit on an exchange for a MONTH before they pull them out, or 2) Who are hoping for a short-term bounce before they cash out, or 3) Who are terrified of withdrawing as fiat due to AML regs.
2) Doesn't ring true for me as I wouldn't expect enough people to support price here, and it's a very risky game.
Anyone have any insights?



439. Post 17801121 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: DARKHOLDER on February 10, 2017, 10:34:05 AM
So I'm quite staggered at the lack of panic selling. Ok, we had a $100 drop, which wasn't great, but why isn't it more?
It suggests that there are plenty of Chinese speculators who are 1) Happy to pick up BTC and LTC and let them sit on an exchange for a MONTH before they pull them out, or 2) Who are hoping for a short-term bounce before they cash out, or 3) Who are terrified of withdrawing as fiat due to AML regs.
2) Doesn't ring true for me as I wouldn't expect enough people to support price here, and it's a very risky game.
Anyone have any insights?


Next 24 hours will be critical Wink If hold 950$ line then go up, if not then go back to 800 Grin

Well maybe. But I can't get my head around the fact that the panicking hasn't already been more panicky. I mean, someone says your funds are locked for 30 days and how many will just take it on the chin rather than scramble to get them out asap?



440. Post 17801365 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: becoin on February 10, 2017, 11:01:00 AM
So I'm quite staggered at the lack of panic selling. Ok, we had a $100 drop, which wasn't great, but why isn't it more?
It suggests that there are plenty of Chinese speculators who are 1) Happy to pick up BTC and LTC and let them sit on an exchange for a MONTH before they pull them out, or 2) Who are hoping for a short-term bounce before they cash out, or 3) Who are terrified of withdrawing as fiat due to AML regs.
2) Doesn't ring true for me as I wouldn't expect enough people to support price here, and it's a very risky game.
Anyone have any insights?


Next 24 hours will be critical Wink If hold 950$ line then go up, if not then go back to 800 Grin

Well maybe. But I can't get my head around the fact that the panicking hasn't already been more panicky. I mean, someone says your funds are locked for 30 days and how many will just take it on the chin rather than scramble to get them out asap?

Agree.. those news not so good for all traders in those exchanges... Sad Maybe after month we see new dump..

Why wait a month? They're allowed to dump their bitcoin now. They just can't withdraw.
Dumb money dumpted their bitcoins yesterday. Smart money are accumulating taking advantage of this opportunity.

This is basically my point. The typical ratio of dumb:smart would usually point to a much dumpier dump.
Ah well, probably some explanation involving a badger or something.



441. Post 17804420 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

I would also give more credence to an outfit with more than 22 followers.



442. Post 17813019 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: swogerino on February 11, 2017, 11:26:34 AM
Chinese exchanges stop withdraws and the market goes down by less than $100

Almost perfect
It does sound like a fairy tale doesn't it?
With a happy ending now we are living in with the price now over $1000 and nicely rising ever slightly every passing hour.

I do think it is the ETF is to blame for this one. Grin

Is it possible that the Chinese exchanges have been faking volumes even since the last talk with PBoC, which resulted in them starting to charge fees? That would help explain why this week's PBoC intervention hasn't had much of an impact.



443. Post 17813331 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on February 11, 2017, 11:49:59 AM
Chinese exchanges stop withdraws and the market goes down by less than $100

Almost perfect
It does sound like a fairy tale doesn't it?
With a happy ending now we are living in with the price now over $1000 and nicely rising ever slightly every passing hour.

I do think it is the ETF is to blame for this one. Grin

Is it possible that the Chinese exchanges have been faking volumes even since the last talk with PBoC, which resulted in them starting to charge fees? That would help explain why this week's PBoC intervention hasn't had much of an impact.
I must agree with you on this one. Those Chinese were just trying to trick the West into believing what they want them to believe with more smoke and mirrors to get them in their own clutches for whatever reasoning they have.
I believe what will keep the price stable now is the announcement of the ETF by the Winklevoss's and what that could reap for bitcoin by the ones that are not totally convinced of BTC as a viable option to compete with other fiat and assets like gold and silver for that matter.
We will just have to wait and see what the SEC has to say now.
Nay or yey!

Do you guys actually think the people that for some reason want to buy Bitcoin now are waiting with such furious intent to buy into an ETF that on March 11, the money will just start flowing like a rap music video?

I believe the money will trickle in at first and the Bitcoin economy won't see any real money for 2 to 3 months after, June-ish.





September 21, 2017 save the date



I'm not convinced it'll happen at all. I am usually bullish on these matters but I just can't see it happening.

More then likely, it doesn't happen and then commence post speculation dump

Who knows if the ETF will be approved? But if it is there will be a large new source of liquidity at a time when bitcoin is making the news for its ath and use as a store of value.



444. Post 17813455 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on February 11, 2017, 12:08:49 PM
Chinese exchanges stop withdraws and the market goes down by less than $100

Almost perfect
It does sound like a fairy tale doesn't it?
With a happy ending now we are living in with the price now over $1000 and nicely rising ever slightly every passing hour.

I do think it is the ETF is to blame for this one. Grin

Is it possible that the Chinese exchanges have been faking volumes even since the last talk with PBoC, which resulted in them starting to charge fees? That would help explain why this week's PBoC intervention hasn't had much of an impact.
I must agree with you on this one. Those Chinese were just trying to trick the West into believing what they want them to believe with more smoke and mirrors to get them in their own clutches for whatever reasoning they have.
I believe what will keep the price stable now is the announcement of the ETF by the Winklevoss's and what that could reap for bitcoin by the ones that are not totally convinced of BTC as a viable option to compete with other fiat and assets like gold and silver for that matter.
We will just have to wait and see what the SEC has to say now.
Nay or yey!

Do you guys actually think the people that for some reason want to buy Bitcoin now are waiting with such furious intent to buy into an ETF that on March 11, the money will just start flowing like a rap music video?

I believe the money will trickle in at first and the Bitcoin economy won't see any real money for 2 to 3 months after, June-ish.





September 21, 2017 save the date



I'm not convinced it'll happen at all. I am usually bullish on these matters but I just can't see it happening.

More then likely, it doesn't happen and then commence post speculation dump

Who knows if the ETF will be approved? But if it is there will be a large new source of liquidity at a time when bitcoin is making the news for its ath and use as a store of value.

You know dreams are nice to have but the ATH will not be coming in the next 30 days.

Probably true. Point is price is towards the top of its historical range and so bitcoin looks like a good investment to most people. And suddenly, here's a new etf that lets you invest in it when nothing else offers much in the way of returns. I'm curious to see how it turns out but wouldn't want to predict anything specific.



445. Post 17814861 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: bitcoinvest on February 11, 2017, 02:18:28 PM
the last pages of this post 90% of the post propose to buy when saying that we go ATH etc...
In my experience when many people tell you to buy you need sell and when sell you need buy.
Yesterday i said it will go down but it remained stable, what indeed changed is the buy orders that are dramatically less...let's see how it goes from here...

I think you misunderstood. I was suggesting that retail investors would only sit up and take note when they see prices hit highs. When bitcoin is 'dying', people don't want to go near it. It takes guts to be a contrarian investor.



446. Post 17816817 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 11, 2017, 05:10:55 PM
Chinese exchanges stop withdraws and the market goes down by less than $100

Almost perfect
It does sound like a fairy tale doesn't it?
With a happy ending now we are living in with the price now over $1000 and nicely rising ever slightly every passing hour.

I do think it is the ETF is to blame for this one. Grin

Is it possible that the Chinese exchanges have been faking volumes even since the last talk with PBoC, which resulted in them starting to charge fees? That would help explain why this week's PBoC intervention hasn't had much of an impact.

I'm not sure about what speculative point you are making here that is of any significance?

Sure, we know that they were extensively faking volume, but after they discontinued margin trading and implementing fees, you want to suggest that they continued to fake volume in any kind of meaningful way that caused further PBOC intervention... that does not make sense.  Those exchanges were already on the PBOC radar by the time the PBOC had already intervened to cause them to discontinue margin trading and to implement fees.  The later intervention in regards to getting the exchanges to implement AML requirements is just a further intervention along the same theme... the lack of impact of the latest intervention might have more to do with the fact that the intervention had already started rather than the fact that the latest intervention does not have teeth.. because it is a bit of a bad precedent, no?  to freeze the ability of BTC holders to move their BTC from the exchanges for 30 days... that seems quite a bad thing if you had BTC on the exchanges and just for the precedent that it potentially sets.

Oh good grief...



447. Post 17816858 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 11, 2017, 05:27:34 PM

good grief what?  I asked you to explain, and I provided my own assessment... but instead you gots nothing, except for finger pointing and implied whining that you are being picked on (but you are the one that spouted out the incomplete ideas in the first place that raised these kinds of questions, no?)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection



448. Post 17817762 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: 600watt on February 11, 2017, 06:11:54 PM

that is my opinion all along: jjg is doing exactly what he is accusing others. i did not know that was a known phenomenon. i thought he is just trolling. good find, cassius.

I was a therapist, in another life. One of the reasons I stopped was because it's exhausting when people say the same thing week in and out but do nothing about it. Unfortunately, most people don't really want to change. Their neuroses serve a purpose and are the price of not having to make the effort required actually to get better.
I don't entirely blame them. The human mind is hardwired for economy and change is hard. It's just frustrating, that's all.
You're able to read between the lines so you'll understand the relevance for this situation.



449. Post 17818379 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 11, 2017, 07:24:46 PM
Oh?  now you are trying to act as if you are some kind of "expert" in the topic.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes  Maybe your "therapist" status shows that you want to be in "control"

This is not 'substantive'.

Quote
What you are an expert in is avoiding addressing topics, and taking matters personally and diversion... If you just attempted to respond to the substance of my post in regards to bitcoin and the questions that I asked you in terms of backing up your bitcoin related claims:

This is projection.

Quote
(here's your statement:  "Is it possible that the Chinese exchanges have been faking volumes even since the last talk with PBoC, which resulted in them starting to charge fees? That would help explain why this week's PBoC intervention hasn't had much of an impact."), and I had asked some questions from you to attempt to back up your speculation.

This is not a statement.
It is a question. The statement that immediately follows is the back up. The former explains the latter. It's one explanation for what's going on. Not the best, not the worst. For your delectation and appreciation, I've put another one below.

Quote
If you could stick to the topic of bitcoin, then maybe we would not be delving into this land of irrelevance and your supposed "expertise" in a non-topical issue, your stupid-ass attempts at arm-chair diagnosis of psychology.

This is definitely projection.
Here's how we can be sure. If you answer this post, you will be the one further 'delving into this land of irrelevance', proving me incontrovertibly right. Go on. Answer Smiley
And that, my friend, is called 'Reverse Psychology'.



On-topic: China had relatively little effect and my guess is that the ETF won't have a dramatic impact, one way or another. Markets don't exactly react to news, they treat it as an excuse to go where they want to anyway. Hence the headlines that say: USD fell in response to disappointing jobs data // USD rose despite disappointing jobs data. We've been in a strong uptrend for months with no real sign of a bubble or blow-off top, so I'm expecting that to continue until such time as it looks like it's overcooked things. At which point China, the ETF or some other reason will provide the 'reason' to switch to bear mode.

Beer o'clock. Over and out.



450. Post 18034798 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: bitcoinvest on March 02, 2017, 09:26:57 AM
wow! buy orders on Kraken that i watch right now got very strong.. 151 BTC to buy at 1164€
the party is on people!! today maybe we pass gold price?  as we speak gold price: 1,181.12 EURO  with red flags:) and green for BTC Smiley

That's how it goes. When the price rises... BUY!
Meanwhile Coinfloor, the UK's biggest exchange and one of the only ones the bank's haven't hamstrung, is wavering at £999.
Looks like we'll take out the Gox ATH today, which will mean that no one who is holding a bitcoin will have lost money on that bitcoin. Gives you an insight into FOMO since everyone is winning.

Edit: just blew through £1k.



451. Post 18034992 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: bitcoinvest on March 02, 2017, 09:48:38 AM
wow! buy orders on Kraken that i watch right now got very strong.. 151 BTC to buy at 1164€
the party is on people!! today maybe we pass gold price?  as we speak gold price: 1,181.12 EURO  with red flags:) and green for BTC Smiley

That's how it goes. When the price rises... BUY!
Meanwhile Coinfloor, the UK's biggest exchange and one of the only ones the bank's haven't hamstrung, is wavering at £999.
Looks like we'll take out the Gox ATH today, which will mean that no one who is holding a bitcoin will have lost money on that bitcoin. Gives you an insight into FOMO since everyone is winning.

Edit: just blew through £1k.

Can you explain this interesting post of you little bit since i lost almost all my bitcoins at that time on Gox how this i happening ? We already lost and we loose every single minute that the time passes and there is not pay out yet.... No matter the price we are going to suffer more or less and we do for the last 3 years almost...if they clear this out then all the community will be happier Smiley

I just mean that everyone who ever bought a bitcoin and still holds it (so yes, if you lost them in Gox that doesn't count) is now in the black. At $1,242 that even includes the people who bought on Gox at the ATH, assuming they withdrew.
Basically I'm saying that when the price is higher than ever before, everyone feels like they are an amazing trader because they are winning. You can see what sort of behaviour that leads to...



452. Post 18035097 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on March 02, 2017, 10:08:30 AM
£1000


Congratulations to all fellow Brits

Yes!
The fall in Sterling is partly responsible, but I'll take that anyway. Debt in GBP, earnings in USD/BTC.



453. Post 18037943 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: blockcha1n on March 02, 2017, 02:53:11 PM
What's going to happen when $1242 is past?
A Mt. gox is finally dead announcement and everybody and everything is at peace in the world? Undecided

It will be similar to that scene in Ghostbusters, only instead of a giant marshmallow man, Marc Karpeles will explode.



454. Post 18109068 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Latest appears to be that ETF deadline may come and go and it will be approved by default (apparently such is often the way of things in these matters). Is that a reasonable TL;DR or are we expecting a specific statement at some point?



455. Post 18138810 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Seems like it won't be Monday then: https://twitter.com/ryanvlastelica/status/840217251223556096



456. Post 18138824 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: podyx on March 10, 2017, 06:55:54 PM



Meaning it will be today. Are violins required?



457. Post 18183841 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Lauda on March 14, 2017, 02:18:58 PM

Fed raising interest rates -> bullish for Bitcoin? Would be nice if someone elaborated on that.

I see no obvious reason. Barring other economic weird stuff going on (which doesn't seem to apply this time) it doesn't make a lot of sense. The only straw I could grasp at is if a minority of stock traders who see the market dipping because others are selling for the stronger USD decide to put money in BTC in the hope of seeing better returns. It makes sense to frontrun the stock market drop, but if you don't like the dollar, where are you going to go?
I doubt there's any meaningful correlation, anyway.



458. Post 18184014 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: kurious on March 14, 2017, 02:35:12 PM
Normally, raising interest rates makes a currency stronger.

Yes, hence pulling money out of other asset classes like stocks and arguably bitcoin, all things being equal. I doubt there's much of an effect for bitcoin, if any, but if there was it would be in that direction.



459. Post 18184080 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Best guess is that the rise is just continuation of trend, no fundamental change in overall bullish sentiment despite the COIN decision, and lower fresh supply from mining hitting the market. I suppose there may be other traders who believe SolidX stands a chance.



460. Post 18184141 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: kurious on March 14, 2017, 02:46:03 PM
Normally, raising interest rates makes a currency stronger.

Yes, hence pulling money out of other asset classes like stocks and arguably bitcoin, all things being equal. I doubt there's much of an effect for bitcoin, if any, but if there was it would be in that direction.

If people's savings can keep pace with inflation (which is also usually held back by high rates) by normal deposit account savings, then why risk it in shares?

Stocks are more popular when money is cheap, but saving doesn't pay much as investors are desperate to get returns that low bank rates will not supply.

Low rates encourage higher risk savings to look more appealing, so higher rates (ordinarily) should discourage riskier investments - such as (arguably) Bitcoin.

This is of course classical economic theory - and often money markets, savers, investors and borrowers don't know enough about the theory to do what it says they should Wink

I thought this was exactly my point! Falling stock prices would generally correlate with a fall in bitcoin, under this theory. In practice I doubt bitcoin traders are a large enough and homogenous enough group for that to hold true.



461. Post 18195183 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Jumanji7 on March 15, 2017, 08:57:38 AM
I have a feeling that we are in a bull trap phase  Sad

I'm very interested to see what impact the SolidX decision will have. Common sense says none, since COIN should have signposted the outcome very clearly. But my guess is that some traders won't have interpreted it that way and are still pricing the possibility into their calculations. Once that's out of the way things may be clearer.



462. Post 18220400 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on March 17, 2017, 08:08:15 AM
Jimbo is probably rushing to the nearest bitcoin ATM to buy.

No, he is still sleeping off last night's 30 beers. Then he will rush to the atm. He is nothing if not predictable.



463. Post 18221195 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: HanvanBitcoin on March 17, 2017, 09:13:23 AM
Almost below €1000,-.  I have my buy order placed at €850,-

Bold.



464. Post 18263757 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Torque on March 20, 2017, 01:02:02 PM
Here's something different:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-39325561



Well, not sure about USD prices but it looks like BTC will soon get a bump against Sterling.



465. Post 18265634 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: STT on March 20, 2017, 03:24:59 PM
Well, not sure about USD prices but it looks like BTC will soon get a bump against Sterling.

Brexit anticipated weakness is already in the price for sterling, certainly cable I think has a fair chance to be neutral to positive this year.  Dollar has its own news and dynamics vs world trade, obviously brexit is stated a reference to the current changes passing in USA for its trade agreements.    
Overall the trend for sterling is negative for some years now, long before Brexit.  Fiscal and trade deficit but vs dollar it may stay quite level.

BTC in CNY I think has held a lower point and is not negative.  I think its showing neutral action and may hold till news effects it further.

Dollar strength has come off some as less rate rises are seen likely.  $1060 and above is more positive action if it can hold that but overall it looks less positive then the CNY charts I see.  It'd be good to see if Dollar index shows weakness does this help the price for bitcoin

True, but there is ALWAYS the knee-jerk reaction. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/business-39306336
Twitchy traders in forex as well as BTC.



466. Post 18278400 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Morgenst3rn on March 21, 2017, 02:37:36 PM
Bitcoin is now batteling to restore its value of march 18. If bitcoin cant break trough this its a major bearish signal.

I'm quite amazed how quick the price of BTC rose again after the mayor FUD during last Thursday - Sunday.
Has someone an idea how this happened despite the threat of a hard fork & the (new) rumors from China, regarding PBoC and regulations of the exchanges?

I'm not sure something 'happened', more that panic sellers overcooked it, helped along by some strategic negative press. So this is more like reversion-to-mean than a fundamental turnaround. That sort of thing generally plays out more slowly, with the news providing noise in the short term.



467. Post 18293189 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: kurious on March 22, 2017, 04:20:38 PM
Semi related to Bitcoin - stay safe people in London:

https://www.rt.com/uk/381771-gunfire-loud-bangs-parliament/

Nutter with a sword shot by police.  That is all.  
Nutters in England have fewer guns than in other countries, fortunately.

EDIT: Fewer, not less.  Unforgivable

We should have a 'swear box' for that kind of mistake. 1 BTC fine.

No doubt, if he's alive, it will turn out he'll claim to be anti-Brexit or something, like the (pro-Brexit) lunatic who killed Jo Cox.



468. Post 18301930 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Totscha on March 23, 2017, 10:53:26 AM
I have this crazy perspective about the Core vs. Unlimited BTC. The miners saying that their BTU will be the winner is a lot of wishfull thinking IMO. Just because they process the blocks they now somehow own the system??? They're hired help. That's why they get paid to do their job.

If we get the fork with two competing currencies, which one will be the winner? The market will decide, sure. Specifically the buyers. People giving their $$$ in exchange for BTC, not the miners. They really should take a step back and figure out they're not the bosses and they can get fired if they go too far...


from what I understand..with 100 btc (say you own) you get BOTH..BTC and BTU of 100 coins....thus if you just hold and one becomes worth nothing..you still have the same $$$ vs BTC winner that you had before...the price may tank but the amount of BTC you have will be the same...this of course if you did nothing....

(or do I have this wrong?)

Yeah, that's right. You own 100 BTC in both chains. So it doesn't matter to you which one is worth more $$$ or even if one of them dies. You just have to wait patiently until the smoke clears...

Miners however can only mine on one chain. So they have to choose the winning side.

Eh. In theory, I think. But the problem is that in theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they're not.
It makes sense that current value would be perfectly split between the two chains, but I doubt it will pan out exactly like that. One (I wouldn't dare to speculate which) might essentially be treated as an altcoin, with lower volumes and liquidity, which could be manipulated, pumped, whatever. Where there is money, hashrate will inevitably follow. Both chains will persist for a long time, even if one has 1% the market cap of the other. My guess is that total value with oscillate around pre-fork value, with some pretty wild swings.
The rational thing to do is ensure you have all your own keys, sit patiently and wait it all out until the winner becomes clear, then access the BTC on that chain as normal. Unfortunately, 'rational' is an adjective that applies to neither markets nor bitcoiners.



469. Post 18301979 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: elebit on March 23, 2017, 11:01:52 AM
Maybe a large short position was taken out around $950 in anticipation of sales that then got unexpectedly bought up by a raging bull market? Now a very large Chinese miner and fabricator is actually under water to the extent that they are very desperate for a much lower price for its business survival? Such a desperate actor will do anything, including threatening to fork bitcoin or otherwise nuclear options, since it is going bankrupt anyway.

Mind blown. Do you think this theory holds water? What signs would point to miners taking out big shorts?

The Chinese exchanges always had an enormous amount of leveraged trades, which the miners potentially could have been a big part of. But wasn't leveraged trading stopped as part of PBoC sanctions? And it doesn't look like those trades moved to Finex, they mostly disappeared. Or do you think that they still do it, but under the table?

It seems highly likely that one or more Chinese exchange is under water, for one reason or another, and has been running a fractional reserve for a while. What they do about it, who knows? I don't think the conspiracy theory stacks up and there is, of course, the chance of it going the wrong way on them again Smiley



470. Post 18301989 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: promomei on March 23, 2017, 11:06:23 AM
Hey guys  Huh
Is it save now to keep BTC on blockchain info
and what happens with it after fork  Huh



Just make sure you have your keys. Blockchain.info lets you access them. Do it and keep them somewhere safe Smiley



471. Post 18302153 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: promomei on March 23, 2017, 11:12:48 AM
Hey guys  Huh
Is it save now to keep BTC on blockchain info
and what happens with it after fork  Huh



Just make sure you have your keys. Blockchain.info lets you access them. Do it and keep them somewhere safe Smiley

ok ty  Wink
crazy stuff is going on with this unlimited  bitcoin Undecided

I'm still very unclear of the odds of it actually happening. Vinny Lingham had some interesting insights earlier. https://vinnylingham.com/the-power-of-the-invisible-hand-56efaedfb544#.19bmedhhn
It seems it was pretty controversial, so I'm just reading his follow up.



472. Post 18303544 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: york780 on March 23, 2017, 01:07:39 PM
Good lord, the amount of concern-trolling in this thread has now reached epic levels.   Roll Eyes
bull trap. Thats all i am going to say.

No, I'm pretty sure you're going to say more Smiley



473. Post 18304036 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: fichtn12345 on March 23, 2017, 01:40:28 PM
Good lord, the amount of concern-trolling in this thread has now reached epic levels.   Roll Eyes
bull trap. Thats all i am going to say.

No, I'm pretty sure you're going to say more Smiley

Lmao. Good one!
By the way, when is the bitcoin 1000$ party?!

After next weekend, when PBoC unexpectedly forces US regulators to approve SolidX by threatening to dump its USD reserves and simultaneously disappears Jihan.



474. Post 18307019 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: york780 on March 23, 2017, 04:52:59 PM
...
If segwit has not activated by the end of one retarget period after 15 November 2017, segwit will cease to be eligible for activation.

So we have time until November to reach 2k$ or higher, then doom (because the fuckin' miners won't let Segwit happen)... good to know.
no segwit means crash? Or fork? Or both? Man why is there always something to screw the btc price Undecided

It's a big ask, and I can't see it happening. But we'll know it's dead well before the deadline, so it won't affect the market.



475. Post 18308277 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

95% hashrate activation seems crazy. I can't understand why they ever thought that was going to happen.



476. Post 18313914 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: bitserve on March 24, 2017, 07:52:50 AM
In the past 24 hours it seems that some percentage of signaling mined blocks have changed from BU to Segwit. (4% over the total, 12% change from BU to Segwit).

https://coin.dance/blocks

BU: 36.1%
Segwit: 31.9%
8MB: 5.6%

Maybe its just an oscillation... but worth pointing it. (ANTPOOL, representing almost half of BU signaling, is still doing it, though).


Which means that right now, Antpool could swing the balance by tipping the total to within a whisker of 51%. Would be a pretty powerful signal.
Wonder if there will be some kind of backhander or closed-doors negotiation and then suddenly, he'll change sides.



477. Post 18314865 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: york780 on March 24, 2017, 10:49:38 AM
100% there will be dump, below 900$
Mmm, if everybody starts agreeing with me, I might have to reconsider  Huh     Wink
No trust yourself. The law of the 3 dead cat bounces always works.

Yes, correct.
It always works except in those cases when it doesn't.
You are so wise. You must understand the casus fully. You are the real expert here.

Ok, kids. Cards on the table. Where is the bottom? Or where's the next move up to if there's no dump?
Specifics, please. Then it will be clear who was right and who was wrong after the fact.



478. Post 18314916 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: york780 on March 24, 2017, 10:56:19 AM

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/ST356mvt-03062334-BITCOIN-BE-PREPARED/

Here you go.

Dump will happen because of fear for a bear market, and lots of traders will jump on the Eth train that started yesterday

So basically your target is ~$800 and if it goes below that, hello bear.



479. Post 18315033 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: york780 on March 24, 2017, 11:02:36 AM

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/ST356mvt-03062334-BITCOIN-BE-PREPARED/

Here you go.

Dump will happen because of fear for a bear market, and lots of traders will jump on the Eth train that started yesterday

So basically your target is ~$800 and if it goes below that, hello bear.

I will jump in if it goes below 900$. But 800$ is possible but i have to admit that i dont have the guts to wait that long.

Ok, thank you. Now we will see if it comes to pass. Smiley
Personally I think it's quite possible that the market's nerves around BU and the failed ETF bid are still to play out.



480. Post 18316286 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: elebit on March 24, 2017, 01:14:38 PM
Indeed. They're conspiring a 51% attack:

Would anyone seriously preparing a 51% attack tell everyone about it beforehand? Or is this just scare tactics?

I think it's actually smart to do, from the perspective of the attacker. You're essentially saying: I'm doing this. You can get on board now, or suffer later. I.e. by trailing it, you actually help yourself by getting more miners on board in the early stages.



481. Post 18316386 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: ImI on March 24, 2017, 01:22:04 PM

To get 2/3 or 3/4 of the hashrate isn't THAT easy. At least i think so.



A large mining pool might tip the scales to 51% now. That would be a powerful signal.
95%? Forget it. Ever. Just don't know how that one gets resolved.



482. Post 18316564 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: ImI on March 24, 2017, 01:38:31 PM

To get 2/3 or 3/4 of the hashrate isn't THAT easy. At least i think so.



A large mining pool might tip the scales to 51% now. That would be a powerful signal.
95%? Forget it. Ever. Just don't know how that one gets resolved.

51% is not enough to HF securely and you are aware of that 2/3 and 3/4 ≠ 95%?  Wink

Let me just phone Carol Vorderman to check your maths.



483. Post 18325272 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: york780 on March 25, 2017, 07:42:01 AM
Its done guys, its finally over

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/t7QtvrJg-BITCOIN/

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/5S7N1OUT-BTC-MORE-DROP-COMING/

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD3M/jNG1byY6-My-MACD-strategy-system/

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCCNY/PpREDDYJ-It-s-time-to-take-a-rest/

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/68wxysiu-incoming/



5 charts to confirm that we will go up.  Smiley

Well, you called the dump pretty well. Bottom was $900.20.



484. Post 18325455 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: york780 on March 25, 2017, 08:12:13 AM
York I apologize for publicly criticizing you. Great calls, I must say. Hope you are right. The past week has been kind of stressful for us bitcoiners.

Dont mention it man. We are here to help each other out.

Credit where it's due, it takes a man to admit he's wrong.



485. Post 18327982 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: K~Ehleyr on March 25, 2017, 12:40:24 PM
I've held back from trying to discuss my concerns here because I know I'll only get accused of spreading FUD but, since I do have skin in the game too, I'm going to post anyway.

The way I see it, Bitcoin Core vs. Unlimited isn't the problem, the prospect of a hardfork isn't the problem.  The problem is the total inability for Bitcoin to reach any sort of consensus.  I think many of us now are past giving a fuck about how the blocksize issue is resolved.  Double the blocksize or halve it, implement some wizardry or tell the microtransactions to sod off and use alts instead, it really doesn't matter.  What matters is that it is resolved one way or another.  The lack of governance is the real problem, only compounded by the refusal of so many to even acknowledge that there is a problem at all.

As others have said here before me, what makes this crash so difficult to stomach isn't the falling price.  We've all seen bitcoin win all sorts of challenges before.  What makes this one so disturbing is that the threat is on the inside, bitcoin's lack of governance, lack of ability to say "this is a problem and this is how we're going to fix it" is actually tearing it apart from the inside.  I'd rather see bitcoin drop to $200 because of China or the US government than to $900 because of infighting.  At least then I'd have some confidence that it would come through, but Bitcoin can only win through if it's in good fighting form and right now it isn't.

At risk of incurring the wrath of the Bad Analogy Police, Bitcoin right now reminds me of Ellen Ripley.  She could fight off any predator and overcome any threat until the threat came from within her own body.  Then she was forced to destroy herself before it destroyed her.

Yes, she was resurrected stronger and cooler for the fourth movie but that took many years and many failed attempts, and even when they succeeded in bringing her back to life she was fundamentally different as a result of incorporating the alien DNA into her own  Tongue


tl;dr: we just need a solution, any solution, but that does mean first accepting that there's a problem in the first place.

I get what you're saying and it's a good analogy up to a point, but seriously, some things should be allowed to die. 4th Aliens movie is like the 3rd Mad Max. No need to bring that stuff up.



486. Post 18351496 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: willope on March 27, 2017, 11:20:25 AM
BU hashrate 47,2% the last 24 hours.
SELL, PANIC,
Bitcoin is DEAD Shocked

No, seriously, I am a bit worried. My life saving is all in, it's quite stressing.

Well this is certainly getting Interesting.
The market doesn't massively seem to care yet though. Still pushing $1k.



487. Post 18352267 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on March 27, 2017, 12:31:33 PM
Bearstamp's finally pumped up to $1010. If bearstamp's over $1000 then all the important exchanges should also be above it. The confidence is returning to the market now pools like f2pool are stating they will prevent any attempts at a fork.

You have to ask... What took them so long?



488. Post 18353470 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Wexlike on March 27, 2017, 02:09:09 PM
They're supporting their desire to seize power. And no one's actually running BU.

They may be hungry but they ain't stupid. They'd signal an implementation that did nothing but make a farting noise if it got them power.
I am going to hodl from now on guys. Cant predict this price anymore. BU is screwing my mathematical calculations all over today. Rip trading, it was fun while it lasted. Huge profits but also huge losts like today. Now i only have my good old cold storage. I will dump more fiat money in it and keep hodling. Rip easy trade days.  Roll Eyes
Yes for the haters: i got rekt today like you hodlers get rekt earlier this month. But i have to go trough all the stress and switching to shitty altcoins and fiat like some crazy idiot. And for what...

And a new hodler was born.
It really hurts. I increased my stash so many times i felt like a pro. And now BOOOM! All trading stash destroyed by 1 mistake, nice. Hodling for ever is the only right choice. This means that i will become just as sassy and sarcastic like you guys? Its part of the hodling process i guess. Smeagol was also hodling his precious ring and look how he turned into shit haha  Cheesy

I don't get it, how can you lose your full trading stash from a 10% eth/btc move ?

Were you playing with leverage?



489. Post 18364150 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 28, 2017, 10:50:28 AM
Is it possible to increase the blocksize without a fork? Even just in theory?

I believe it will take a fork of some kind, pretty much by definition.

Can someone give a sane answer to why 'BitcoinPlus' has 16k volume and 1300% rise today? I can't believe it's really to do with the BU fork thing.



490. Post 18365363 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on March 28, 2017, 12:59:15 PM
Yup, miners are running BU. 37,2% by hash rate right now... Did you think the BU signaling is just for show?  Grin

they are mining blocks with core software with a little message that says they're digging unlimited. read up.

that is signalling, not running. big and obvious difference.

if they had been running unlimited they would've lost money with the node crashes, let alone what other problems there might be.


Are they not mining regular, Core-compatible blocks using a fork that only activates big blocks when the threshold % is reached?



491. Post 18375689 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: york780 on March 29, 2017, 08:54:12 AM

Nah , Bitcoin FOMO game is strong right now. Altcoins are going to get rekt. I only wonder how long the whales can keep the price of ethereum on this level. Dash already colapsing. Ethereum is just going to be the next one.

I'm wondering if Ethereum just had its April 2013 moment. I'd personally expect a collapse, though I'd never short it - too many surprises in crypto.



492. Post 18375909 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: york780 on March 29, 2017, 09:13:40 AM

Nah , Bitcoin FOMO game is strong right now. Altcoins are going to get rekt. I only wonder how long the whales can keep the price of ethereum on this level. Dash already colapsing. Ethereum is just going to be the next one.

I'm wondering if Ethereum just had its April 2013 moment. I'd personally expect a collapse, though I'd never short it - too many surprises in crypto.

You are right. It looks like a new trend in the atcoins is going on, the bitcoin fork FUD pushes bitcoin look-a-like crypto's to the moon. Pump&dump style. Yesterday bitcoinplus, now Bytecoin. Also bitcoindark pumped. I am almost sure that bitcoin21 will be the next one to pump&dump with 300%. So if you like high risk short termed investment i would put my money in this one. But i would never risk such a thing, it would be madness  Wink.

Think I'll pass.
Money tends to move down the pyramid, from BTC to big alts (ETH, DASH), mid-size ones, and then the P&D vehicles. Yesterday's BTCD pump is the perfect example - it's been swapped out for another coin now, so BTCD itself has low available supply and is thinly traded.
So now we're at the bottom of the pyramid, which means there's nowhere left to go downwards. It's back to BTC or fiat from here.



493. Post 18394336 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: hd060053 on March 30, 2017, 03:45:18 PM
after 2 years i start my litecon core wallet again Cheesy

I heard it will be on Gox soon.



494. Post 18418103 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: york780 on April 01, 2017, 04:54:57 PM
omg shapeshift didnt sended me my coins. You cant see it on the blockchain also. WTF?
Anyone of you guys ever had this problem?

yes, i contacted them and everything resolved in less than 1 hours.

Ok thank god. I have proof that i sended my coins to them and that they didnt sended any to me back. I can feel the stress. Panic level is high right now,

Don't worry, your Pearcoins are in safe hands.



495. Post 18771592 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: york780 on April 27, 2017, 02:15:29 PM
Well..
At least my mom still likes me.

Oh, I didn't mean to hurt your feelings. I think it's the wavering that might have reminded him of yourself, but there's nowt wrong with that.

Yes but it wasnt wavering really.
It was more like choosing between BTC and lots of mooning altcoins.
Its easy to trade some BTC for altcoins, thats why I had some doubt.
'
But never about trading BTC for fiat.

USD and EUR are some instamined manipulated shitcoins.

I also leaved altcoins because I like to focus on 1 crypto.
BTC is the best one by far so I am 100% BTC.

When you look at those numbers of those pump&dump altcoins its quite hard to resist.
But I am ok.


hey, some of those alts are pretty serious. Not all pumpandump.

Short term yes.

But lets look at the 'serious' altcoins compared to BTC.

ETH mined 10% of its total supply rightnow, while BTC is on 77,6%.
ETC mined 30% of its total supply
ZEC mined 5.2% of its total supply
DASH& XRP sucks, instamined trash

Altcoins are trying to be a competitor of BTC, while BTC tries to be a competitor of banks, inflation, goverments, fiat money, gold, and I could go on.

BTC supply is so limited and people are not even realizing it.
I think that we wont see GBTC's on exchanges anymore in about 5 years from now.
1 GBTC would be a whale when we are in 2023.

Altoins are rising because Bitcoin allows it and because their marketcap is small.



I think you've missed the point. BTC = reserve currency of crypto, crypto money, etc. Alts = every other form of blockchain value. Plenty are worthless, or will be soon, but whenever a business launches a blockchain initiative that's not based on BTC... that's an 'alt'. And there are an increasing number as blockchain starts to push into the mainstream.
Maximalists who argue that BTC can and should do everything fail to see the reality that real-world companies missed that memo and that blockchain is being used for all kinds of applications.



496. Post 18834393 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: simmo77 on May 02, 2017, 06:59:00 AM

Quick straw poll, if you'd be so kind.

With the spread of prices I'm curious...  Which source do you take your "current BTC price" from? 

An exchange -> which one? Bitcoinaverage? OTC Vendor price?

Thanks

Stamp for USD. Finex obviously is inflated and it doesn't make sense to use a price you can't actually sell at.
Coinfloor for GBP. Strangely prices there are slightly over the odds when converting from USD at the current exchange rate. But since you can really buy and sell real bitcoins for real fiat there, it's a legit price.



497. Post 18837197 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/68muot/17k_bitfinex_contracts_short_starting_at_1600_if/

Anyone have any insight on this? Not sure if it would be an epic short squeeze or whether Finex is too disconnected from reality now.



498. Post 18837822 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on May 02, 2017, 01:37:47 PM
I remember reading somewhere that 1600 figure has now moved up, but maybe that was a shorter. Shorting seems kinda quaint at the moment.

Probably. Draw attention to it and it's going to move up.
Presumably at some point there will be a classic FOMO spike. If it happens fast enough and hits the threshold there will be a cascading short squeeze, which will indeed be epic. Forget the moon, that would be slingshot effect to Jupiter stuff.



499. Post 18938266 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: ask on May 09, 2017, 10:28:51 AM
Is this gentlemen?

Not yet Cheesy

You may, however, permit yourself a second sandwich.



500. Post 18972646 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: bankpower on May 11, 2017, 12:28:32 PM
Blockchain is been overload with around 100k unconfirmed transactions. Btc price is been up more than what it was expected. All altcoins are going high too. Is it going to be age of altcoins or are they going to collapse soon?

This is what I'm trying to understand too...some say that alts will grow up exponentially together with Bitcoin, some others say that alts will collapse together with inflated Bitcoin, where is the truth? Nobody knows

People think all alts are the same because they can't be bothered to look more closely and figure out the difference, like watching a herd of penguins and claiming they can't tell them apart.
Truth is some penguins will sink, others will fly, based on their individual merits.
This isn't the best analogy, but you get the general point.

Edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dfWzp7rYR4



501. Post 19097061 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: kromer on May 19, 2017, 01:01:45 PM

Bitcoin is battle-tested. No other coin even comes close to the security Bitcoin provides. The problems Bitcoin is currently facing would be just the same for any other coin. Bitcoin's slow (and cautious) progress is a feature, not a bug. The current financial system cannot, and should not, be replaced quickly. And ultimately, anything that most alts can do, will be possible on the Bitcoin blockchain via Lightning, Rootstock, Sidechains, etc.

I wish no bad luck on anyone, but I worry that those people throwing money at alt coins are going to get burned hard. As the incentive to attack those chains increases, you can be sure that people are going to start trying.

It amuses me when maximalists confuse an 'ought' (or 'can') with an 'is'. The reality is that businesses are obliviously just getting on and using non-bitcoin blockchains (= alts) for all kinds of things without any regard to those arguments.



502. Post 19097180 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Torque on May 19, 2017, 03:06:50 PM
It amuses me when maximalists confuse an 'ought' (or 'can') with an 'is'. The reality is that businesses troll traders are obliviously just getting on and using non-bitcoin blockchains (= alts shitcoins) for all kinds of things fleecing newbs out of their $$$ without any regard to those arguments.

FTFY

Plenty of those. But plenty of innovation and legit businesses too. Argue with the market if you want!



503. Post 19100355 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Torque on May 19, 2017, 06:01:27 PM
It amuses me when maximalists confuse an 'ought' (or 'can') with an 'is'. The reality is that businesses troll traders are obliviously just getting on and using non-bitcoin blockchains (= alts shitcoins) for all kinds of things fleecing newbs out of their $$$ without any regard to those arguments.

FTFY

That's happening too. But it's probably incidental. There's an obvious market need for small transactions that Bitcoin has become incapable of filling. Alts are here to stay.

99.7% bitcoin troll trading, FOMO buying as a store of value, or currently spamming the network
0.3% or less people trying to buy a coffee or some other real world transaction (like buying drugs, gambling, etc.)

And I'm being generous, the real ratio is probably way worse than this. So the farcical arguments really need to stop.

Well, I ordered four things for BTC in the last week. The Cryptosteel and SD card were both complicated by delayed txs. At this point, PayPal would be more convenient, which is not cool.



504. Post 19190538 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: machasm on May 25, 2017, 08:49:53 AM
it's going so fast. Ho many % in one month ?
Over 100% !!

On a side note, anyone know somewhere in the UK that accepts BTC for a nice car?

Congratulations - enjoy the well earned BTC =)

If it's more than £11K watch out for CGT, who knows what data from kyc/aml is passed to HMRC behind the scenes. Probably better to hold 20% for a year in reserve just in case.
Thanks for the heads up.
Makes buying a Nice car less fun :-(

If you are married, there is a transferable capital gains tax allowance. So if your wife doesn't book any capital gains, that's £22k tax free.
It's one of the only tax benefits of being married.
There are other benefits of course. Just not related to the tax system.



505. Post 19190843 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on May 25, 2017, 10:55:23 AM

If you are married, there is a transferable capital gains tax allowance. So if your wife doesn't book any capital gains, that's £22k tax free.
It's one of the only tax benefits of being married.
There are other benefits of course. Just not related to the tax system.


What are the other benefits??

Thanks.

Rjclarke2000= married man.

Not going to get into that whole discussion here. Hopefully if you're happily married and have been together for a while you have figured it out for yourself.



506. Post 19190967 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Ibian on May 25, 2017, 11:00:51 AM

If you are married, there is a transferable capital gains tax allowance. So if your wife doesn't book any capital gains, that's £22k tax free.
It's one of the only tax benefits of being married.
There are other benefits of course. Just not related to the tax system.


What are the other benefits??

Thanks.

Rjclarke2000= married man.

Not going to get into that whole discussion here. Hopefully if you're happily married and have been together for a while you have figured it out for yourself.
That's because it is a discussion you know you would lose.

We clearly have had different experiences of marriage.



507. Post 19191051 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Ibian on May 25, 2017, 11:08:31 AM

We clearly have had different experiences of marriage.
How old are you and how old is your wife?

This is relevant, no need to look for excuses to get defensive.

Not defensive. Just aware this is very off-topic and supposed to be getting something constructive done. Unwilling to open a can of worms that - like bitcoin - is likely to be pre-settled in a person's mind rather than liable to be changed by discussion (or, as it happens, evidence - there's plenty of academic studies on it).
Since you asked, I'm in my late 30s and she's 3.5 years older than me.



508. Post 19191140 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Ibian on May 25, 2017, 11:14:59 AM

We clearly have had different experiences of marriage.
How old are you and how old is your wife?

This is relevant, no need to look for excuses to get defensive.

Not defensive. Just aware this is very off-topic and supposed to be getting something constructive done. Unwilling to open a can of worms that - like bitcoin - is likely to be pre-settled in a person's mind rather than liable to be changed by discussion (or, as it happens, evidence - there's plenty of academic studies on it).
Since you asked, I'm in my late 30s and she's 3.5 years older than me.
Ok so she's too old to realistically leave and find someone else, and you likely got married before divorce court became what it is now. That's why you are happy to defend marriage. Your wife is TOO OLD for you to worry about her splitting with your shit.

For the rest of us, it doesn't take an academic study to figure out that getting married today is about the most self-destructive thing a man could do.

So, you're not making too many assumptions there then!



509. Post 19191183 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: machasm on May 25, 2017, 11:17:31 AM
Actually it might be worth getting a divorce now before the price gets any higher!
Could end up giving away more in the future  Wink

I can't think of anything more self-destructive.



510. Post 19375301 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on June 05, 2017, 11:06:24 AM


Well...just a random thing that just hit me on the head....at the current price of gold is $1,280.30 and as of 2 seconds ago
the price of BTC is $2597.00

Well...put a light on my head and paint me like a lighthouse....we are more then TWICE the value of Gold now. Smiley

Sheesh..it was not that long ago we were just trying to MATCH the price of gold if I remember right

(all so fast...all so pump...all so scary) Smiley

anyway..just thought this should be mentioned thou in hindsight it is as obvious as a brick dropped on your foot




Yes searing we are easy to forget the very recent battle to reach gold parity. It's funny how we become used to certain prices so quickly. double gold 1oz price.....amazing.

Spot price, yes. Actually try to buy 2oz gold for 1 BTC from bitgild and you get SPANKED by BitPay's massive spread, or commission fee, or breathing charge, or whatever it is.



511. Post 21214110 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote from: drbrockcoin on August 26, 2017, 07:05:12 AM
Guys, stupid question alert here...


I want to claim my BCH and i am downloading electron cash. I click it to open it and it says "this file is encrypted, Enter your password or choose another file"

Why does it say this if I haven't downloaded it before?

I'm sure it's something simple but I'm a bit dumb.

My advice is stick Coinomi on an android device and use it.

+1

I did this worked for me no problem

Electron Cash is a fork of Electrum and uses many of the same files. If you've ever downloaded Electrum, it will use the password you set for that by default.



512. Post 21496114 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote from: spiderbrain on September 04, 2017, 10:04:02 AM
"buy when there's blood in the streets"
This isn't blood in the streets, this is the knife entering the skin in slow motion, the bleeding has hardly even begun.

You are a bear poet, sir.

Lambie? Igorr? You're... back?!



513. Post 23276150 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Quote from: savetherainforest on October 20, 2017, 03:02:23 AM
Black Mirror is a fucked up show.


A room full of mentality deranged kinky writers with a fetish for the unknown! Smiley

Watched the first one. It was a kind of sick genius. Couldn't face any more though.
Oink.



514. Post 23276845 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.23h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on October 20, 2017, 10:14:05 AM
Black Mirror is a fucked up show.


A room full of mentality deranged kinky writers with a fetish for the unknown! Smiley

Watched the first one. It was a kind of sick genius. Couldn't face any more though.
Oink.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1185749.0
 David Cameron Fucked a Pig and Charlie Brooker is a God

recommend do watch more when you've recovered

Being in Blighty I got to live through the whole Pig-gate thing too. Fun times.



515. Post 23756497 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: AlexGR on October 30, 2017, 08:16:40 AM
$1000 2x coin?

That's insane.

IIRC BCH topped at 1200?


I'm not sure how reliable the futures market was for BCH, but in any case B2x futures will be thinly traded, confined to particular exchanges and susceptible to manipulation.
In the case of B2x, I also suspect that the lack of replay protection will discourage some traders when exchanges enable it. So additional volatility from that...



516. Post 23762594 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.24h):

Quote from: Lincoln6Echo on October 30, 2017, 11:39:47 AM

yeah read this too!

My favorite:
Quote
I’d conquered the Trezor with its nerdishly cruel PIN delay function, and one-upped the part of my brain that thought it could keep a secret from its owner. Fuck the both of you, I thought. I won.

Made me giggle.  Cheesy

That story is just fantastic.



517. Post 23921890 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.25h):

Quote from: micalith on November 02, 2017, 10:44:28 AM
lol  someone just put a 100BTC buy wall on Coinfloor. That's a big wall for that exchange. what a weirdo

It'll get eaten. They arb across exchanges. Someone wants to cash out to GBP and knows they can do it easily.
Coinfloor seems to lag Stamp a little, so you can see the next movement coming. That wall is going to disappear...



518. Post 23922269 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.25h):

Quote from: micalith on November 02, 2017, 11:20:30 AM
topped at £5850 ($7770) on Coinfloor, not quite filling my humble wee , but too well placed sell order, but  Cool

Yeah, USD price started falling before it could happen. Spread is terrible too. But I like Coinfloor otherwise.



519. Post 24123452 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.25h):

Quote from: julian071 on November 06, 2017, 01:32:14 PM
Profit time

have let Mrs V8s go to Tesco for once rather than Asda, but none of that Finest scam.

if it goes to 25k in December, maybe Waitrose...


I can tell who's stash is bigger.

We have gone from Aldi to Lidl

"Moving on up, van de Lidl naar de Ap" even (From the Lidl to the Albert Heijn supermarket).

$25k is Christmas lunch from Sainsburys. Doesn't hurt to splash out once in a while.
$100k is delivered by Ocado.



520. Post 24126972 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.25h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on November 06, 2017, 01:50:08 PM

$25k is Christmas lunch from Sainsburys. Doesn't hurt to splash out once in a while.
$100k is delivered by Ocado.


^^^this is a Marks and Spencer food hall man right here I bet.

Make it $150k BTC and you're on.



521. Post 24515506 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on November 13, 2017, 01:41:30 PM
in other altcoin crashes: GBP. #LifeInEmergingMarkets

You ain't seen nothing yet. Once Theresa May is taken to hospital with a Tory-shaped knife in her back, the BoE miners will fork and print a whole lot more...



522. Post 24911042 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: Tadblt on November 20, 2017, 05:19:08 PM
Its over $8246 woooh! Should have buy more! Bitcoin might reach $10000 before the month ends, bitcoin is not falling but defying gravity, theres no going back folks! To the pluto we go.

To the Pluto. Indeed.



523. Post 24957335 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: fragout on November 21, 2017, 01:13:11 PM
Tether website gone offline. $30 million "hack" last night. Not liking this

I cannot imagine what taking USDT out of play would do to the ecosystem at this point.



524. Post 24959100 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: fragout on November 21, 2017, 01:40:11 PM
Tether website gone offline. $30 million "hack" last night. Not liking this

I cannot imagine what taking USDT out of play would do to the ecosystem at this point.

Thats only part of the potential problem. If they (bitfinex/tether) were issuing tether without any backing ($670 million remember) and using margin on top of that to pump btc, We are in a lot bigger trouble. Not only will everyone who holds tether have a worthless token but we have no idea what any coin is actually worth in the real market.
Its been 24hours since bitfinex said they would be releasing an official statement.

I might be getting paranoid here but it feels like de ja vu (goxed)

I don't think it's paranoia if it's happened before. More like suspicion or realism Smiley
Worst case scenario it does look like a Willy/Gox situation, with QE USDT being used to inflate BTC prices. But I don't think it will be that bad. Even if USDT is a fractional reserve, which would be no trivial thing, it accounts for a relatively small proportion of the market and broader demand is growing fast.
Not a picnic, but no Gox/China ban scenario either.



525. Post 24959340 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: gentlemand on November 21, 2017, 01:51:38 PM
it accounts for a relatively small proportion of the market and broader demand is growing fast.

USDT on BFX has a double whammy effect. It's new money on the exchange that others follow. That's far more potent than the same money on a minor league exchange. It shouldn't be underestimated.

That's true. It wouldn't be pretty. Equally, we're a long way from 2014 now in terms of infrastructure.



526. Post 24959836 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: Torque on November 21, 2017, 01:54:20 PM
Tether website gone offline. $30 million "hack" last night. Not liking this

I cannot imagine what taking USDT out of play would do to the ecosystem at this point.

Thats only part of the potential problem. If they (bitfinex/tether) were issuing tether without any backing ($670 million remember) and using margin on top of that to pump btc, We are in a lot bigger trouble. Not only will everyone who holds tether have a worthless token but we have no idea what any coin is actually worth in the real market.
Its been 24hours since bitfinex said they would be releasing an official statement.

I might be getting paranoid here but it feels like de ja vu (goxed)

I don't think the market will miss a beat. The FUD is by design, the FUDsters need another reason to short/dump the market and cause another panic. It's getting comical at this point. After every rally, there is always some "magical FUD" that appears out of nowhere and gets everyone all frazzled.

You guys need to chillax. Also, why do you guys consider Bitfinex to be the center of the Bitcoin universe? They suck, everyone knows it, no one trusts them, and hardly anyone I know even trades there.

I'd rather say that it's not the right time for this 'news' to make an impact.
The market will probably rise until it gets too far ahead of itself does its full bubble thing. Then it will need a trigger to implode.
Back in 2014 the market shrugged off good news just like it is shrugging off bad news now.



527. Post 24960300 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: Torque on November 21, 2017, 02:07:17 PM
I don't think the market will miss a beat. The FUD is by design, the FUDsters need another reason to short/dump the market and cause another panic. It's getting comical at this point. After every rally, there is always some "magical FUD" that appears out of nowhere and gets everyone all frazzled.

You guys need to chillax. Also, why do you guys consider Bitfinex to be the center of the Bitcoin universe? They suck, everyone knows it, no one trusts them, and hardly anyone I know even trades there.

I'd rather say that it's not the right time for this 'news' to make an impact.
The market will probably rise until it gets too far ahead of itself does its full bubble thing. Then it will need a trigger to implode.
Back in 2014 the market shrugged off good news just like it is shrugging off bad news now.

Let me help you out a little here.

Mark my words, there WILL be another FUD-driven dump coming. Likely on or before 12/14. Or even shortly thereafter. But there will be another huge dump (likely -30%), and it will try to get people to panic sell.

There, I said it. Prepare accordingly.

I'm talking about the end of a bubble phase, not a dump - even a major one - along the way. And yes, I'd expect at least another major dump before $10k.



528. Post 25078677 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.28h):

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 23, 2017, 10:47:26 AM
I hope that this is true and Jihan will get rekt

Oh, rest assured. Jihan will get his comeuppance soon.

It's just a matter of time at this point, and karma can be a real cunt.

Learned a new word today... Yesterday's one was "ameliorate" from one of JJG's posts. Isn't this thread great?

I really hope Wu will soon get what's coming to him. I hate seeing his coin in 4-digit values...

Allow me to be the first to offer you my most sincere contrafibularities.



529. Post 25423185 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Personally I would like to hear from bitcoin expert Prof. Jorge Stolfi at this point.



530. Post 25425054 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Quote from: gentlemand on November 29, 2017, 10:03:42 AM
This particular ATH should be a (near future) indicator of what will happen during adoption. Markets will no longer have 1000's of coins for sale, perhaps only 10's of coins in the future and maybe not even that.

That doesn't really sound like adoption to me. If tens of coins are being sold to millions by people hoarding thousands of them I don't think patience will last.

Personally I would like to hear from bitcoin expert Prof. Jorge Stolfi at this point.

Yeah fuck that guy, what an asshole.

Spent hours, days, hell it was years......dedicating his time towards ridiculing & critisising bitcoin. He should be a multi millionaire. Moron didn’t even invest Cheesy

Hope he regrets every second he spent studying bitcoin.


Possibly the troll I dislike the most. Just think what he could've achieved with the time wasted on bitcoin.

And he got what he wanted out of it, an audience for his droning autist freakery.

Crazy thing is, he wasn't really a proper troll. He genuinely thought he was doing everyone a service and protecting them from themselves.

Edit: https://twitter.com/JorgeStolfi

Turns out he's come to his senses and is now an ardent advocate of decentralised money, teaching courses on what blockchain brings to monetary policy.

Ok, not really.



531. Post 25434020 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.29h):

Quote from: Torque on November 29, 2017, 12:38:04 PM
Except Wall Street wasn’t picking up the ball in 14 days time back in 2013.

You mean you don't remember all the "Wallstreet is coming in!" bullish talk back in Nov 2013? I do. In fact Barry Silbert was constantly tweeting such things daily, and Novogratz was being interviewed by the MSM saying "$2000 is right around the corner. I think Bitcoin will end the year [2013] at $2000+". Now look what he's out there saying.

Remember that shit?

Oh yeah Smiley

My guess is it could get pretty spectacular if CME launches at a time when BTC is clearly overbought (in the short term) and the most obvious option is to short. That could be something really special.



532. Post 25726967 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.30h):

Quote from: Torque on December 04, 2017, 02:19:02 PM
I thought CME was only planning daytime trading for the time being. I might be wrong, though. Honestly, I haven't read the documentation with great care.

I believe you're right. Should be Mon.-Fri., normal U.S. stock trading hours (9:30am-4p EST).

That's right. Never quite made sense to me. Or the circuit breakers. I can't imagine the number of n00b Wall Street traders waking up and finding their contracts have got rekt.

But I'm going to work on that. Smiley



533. Post 25902922 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.31h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on December 07, 2017, 09:13:59 AM
I am very fond of Tera but I think Tera got caught on the wrong side of the rocket today.  

I think Tera will do just fine from her trading Smiley



534. Post 29409671 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

This is an interesting twist on the USDT thing: that they are capitalised, but went about it backwards. http://telegra.ph/Tether-could-be-guilty-of-perpetrating-a-huge-fraud-just-not-the-one-we-think-02-01



535. Post 29410660 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: becoin on February 01, 2018, 08:31:20 PM
This is an interesting twist on the USDT thing: that they are capitalised, but went about it backwards. http://telegra.ph/Tether-could-be-guilty-of-perpetrating-a-huge-fraud-just-not-the-one-we-think-02-01

It doesn't make sense.

Quote
The timing of the creation of new USDT. Analysts have noted this often happens at critical moments, for example when the market is falling sharply or is threatening to breach a significant technical level. That would make sense if Tether are using those opportunities not only to buy cheap BTC, but potentially to manipulate prices higher in order to sell them at a better rate.

Bullsh!t. Every margin trader is doing that.


True. Though not every margin trader gets to print the currency with which they buy BTC.
It's pretty well accepted that the creation of new USDT tends to occur at key points in the trading cycle.



536. Post 29412166 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: becoin on February 01, 2018, 08:51:08 PM
This is an interesting twist on the USDT thing: that they are capitalised, but went about it backwards. http://telegra.ph/Tether-could-be-guilty-of-perpetrating-a-huge-fraud-just-not-the-one-we-think-02-01

It doesn't make sense.

Quote
The timing of the creation of new USDT. Analysts have noted this often happens at critical moments, for example when the market is falling sharply or is threatening to breach a significant technical level. That would make sense if Tether are using those opportunities not only to buy cheap BTC, but potentially to manipulate prices higher in order to sell them at a better rate.

Bullsh!t. Every margin trader is doing that.


True. Though not every margin trader gets to print the currency with which they buy BTC.
It's pretty well accepted that the creation of new USDT tends to occur at key points in the trading cycle.

Margin traders borrow money that might or might not exist at the time trade is done. That's what banks are doing all the time while trading. They borrow overnight to finance their trading positions.

Nobody knows in advance where are the key points in the "trading cycle". Those points become key points only after somebody invests a lot of money buying or selling. In this case acquiring a lot of USDT and selling them for BTC.


By minting 100m usdt, Finex become the trading cycle. That's the whole point.



537. Post 29413785 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: becoin on February 01, 2018, 09:19:40 PM

Every central bank is the trading cycle for their respective currency. USDT is a private currency of Fiinex. It is quite natural if Finex defines the trading cycle of USDT.

Fed is the trading cycle for USD. Finex is the trading cycle for USDT. Get used to it and move on!


I feel like one of us has entirely missed the point of this conversation.



538. Post 29449039 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

In the bull run, there seemed to be a general consensus that the top would be $12-14k. There also seemed to be a general expectation that $8k would be the bottom.
Make of that what you will Smiley



539. Post 29451635 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on February 02, 2018, 12:34:15 PM
I think for sure all lingerie term hodlers have friend with BTC .... for example after i had btc and believed in iT i told Some friend and Some of the bought to even @ low prices +- 700ish -1kish Some later @2k-5kish and offcourse few ATH buyers
Now few of them allready saying When the price hits back 9 or 10k i Will sell.... This is something we Will see a lot offcourse So Many waiting for the Sharp pump to quickly dump there coins
So Many still not getting iT

Autocorrect? Freudian slip typo?



540. Post 29453145 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on February 02, 2018, 01:00:15 PM
I think for sure all lingerie term hodlers have friend with BTC .... for example after i had btc and believed in iT i told Some friend and Some of the bought to even @ low prices +- 700ish -1kish Some later @2k-5kish and offcourse few ATH buyers
Now few of them allready saying When the price hits back 9 or 10k i Will sell.... This is something we Will see a lot offcourse So Many waiting for the Sharp pump to quickly dump there coins
So Many still not getting iT

Autocorrect? Freudian slip typo?

Yeah “the long” became “lingerie” Wink

I figured. But it feels like there should be a meme here.
The real question is why your phone has learned to predict 'lingerie' instead of 'long' for this context  Wink



541. Post 29455190 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: SecondLeoTheSecond on February 02, 2018, 01:30:44 PM
Did we hit the bottom yet Huh

Yes, it was $7700 about an hour ago and you will never get a better deal ever again.

Trust me, I'm a random guy from the internet Wink

You got me sir. Gonna buy them all now.
On a more serious note, the current bounce doesn't convince me yet.
Thats not really a v-shape we're seeing, though the increased volume seems interesting. When we go up another 500 with an addition of 3 billion in volume (on coinmarketcap) I might consider this the bottom for the mid-term.

Right. I want to end today on a green that rivals 15 September for volume.



542. Post 29455614 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: somac. on February 02, 2018, 01:34:42 PM
Did we hit the bottom yet Huh

Yes, it was $7700 about an hour ago and you will never get a better deal ever again.

Trust me, I'm a random guy from the internet Wink

You got me sir. Gonna buy them all now.
On a more serious note, the current bounce doesn't convince me yet.
Thats not really a v-shape we're seeing, though the increased volume seems interesting. When we go up another 500 with an addition of 3 billion in volume (on coinmarketcap) I might consider this the bottom for the mid-term.

Right. I want to end today on a green that rivals 15 September for volume.

Honestly, I think that's exactly what we need to end this.

Yes, I wasn't joking Smiley
I'm not sure if we'll flip green by the end of the day, that would require ~$9100. But at this rate, volume will be close. 30k on Stamp in 14 hours, vs 60k daily vol on 15/9, which I think was highest ever for Stamp. That day put the bottom in pretty convincingly for me at $3k. I think that effectively paved the way for the run-up to ~$19k.
Further down, of course, would be Not Good™.



543. Post 29456351 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: SecondLeoTheSecond on February 02, 2018, 01:47:08 PM

I guess the cynical contrarian stance makes her a better trader than most around here.

The trick is to be extremely cynical, without being so cynical that you completely miss out (Stolfi, Roubini...)



544. Post 29456994 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: d_eddie on February 02, 2018, 01:54:19 PM
I guess the cynical contrarian stance makes her a better trader than most around here.
It's likely. In one of her later posts, she wrote something to the effect that a good trader should be highly unpopular. Now the logical implication doesn't work in reverse of course, but she is somewhat unpopular here, isn't she?  Wink

I'd agree that a good trader would be unpopular around here. Also that the reverse isn't true. Otherwise the anti-Semite would be wealthy, rather than crying into his silver (shekels).



545. Post 29464198 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on February 02, 2018, 03:40:08 PM

 I have ignored the hacking system by sending my BTC founds to the specified database wallet account!


You get merits for having a Brit-like sense of humour.

Quote from: motoprose on February 02, 2018, 03:38:16 PM
It has been stuck at $8700-8800 for 24 hours now.

Have we finally hit the iceberg?
There is a huge ground of ice underneath us
Right? Sad


You what? Not sure if serious or very understated postironic humour. No merits for you.



546. Post 29478811 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 02, 2018, 07:13:40 PM

Has anyone else gone through an obscene amount of alcohol in the last seven days or is it just me?

I've actually been on the wagon.

I am not at all sure that is better  Undecided


Got a totally decent Imperial Stout lined up for this evening. One nice thing about the last year in crypto is not drinking more, but drinking better.



547. Post 29716873 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: TERA2 on February 06, 2018, 11:57:24 AM
Step 1: Click 12H
Step 2: Look at the volume
Step 3: Compare the volume to the last 6 months
Step 4: Become bullish and post train memes

Repeat with 1D tonight at closing

^^^^

1d is shaping up for record volume. This pleases me.



548. Post 29717455 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 06, 2018, 12:40:34 PM
Tradingview shows BTC USD LONGS at ATH.  34,000?  

Either we are going up or these longs are going to get liquidated and we are going to be fucked up fam.  Today will not be boring.

To be fair USD SHORTS are much lower at 15,000.  

Normally this would be bullish.  But things could get squishy if equity markets dump again.  

Well, if it goes down and they start getting liquidated, that's your uber capitulation spike Smiley



549. Post 29778685 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.43h):

TL;DR The central figure of the central banks' central bank is wary about the idea of decentralised money.

How could anyone even pretend to be remotely surprised?



550. Post 30675093 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: RivAngE on February 20, 2018, 10:22:46 AM
Don't you think Bytecoin belongs in this list too? It's name was probably chosen in order to lure in newcomers who wouldn't notice the difference between Bytecoin and Bitcoin.
When I first started with cryptocoins, I remember people calling Bytecoin a scam because of a big amount of pre-mine I think? Not sure.... nevertheless I see that the price has some possitive action the last months so I don't know.
Bytecoin pre-mine was huge, 80% I believe, I heard a lot was given away and a lot assumed lost, considering it wasn't all dumped during one of the major pumps.

I heard it was close to being 100% mined out - I sold all mine during a pump about a year ago

IXC is a good one to add to the list - the first sidechain, still just about keeping its head above water despite being fully mined for about 5 years
Since you mentioned this... what would happen when a coin is fully mined? What if BTC survive for many more years until there is close to 0 coins to mine? In order to sustain a profitability either a lot of ASICs would have to shutdown or the tx fees would skyrocket in order for the miners to receive the fees as rewards (and technically they wouldn't be called miners anymore!)

Has this been confirmed to have happened to any other coin?

It's not a dealbreaker since miners adjust to profitability anyway.
There are plenty of proof-of-stake coins with fixed supply that only distribute tx fees as rewards. Although they don't have the same energy costs as miners there's no difference in principle in the cost/benefit analysis.



551. Post 31658872 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on March 05, 2018, 08:17:33 PM
amendments are changes to the constitution
Psst..have to cryptospeak around these parts..

The original Constitution is made up of 7 articles and it is like the genesis block. Amendments are "consensus" based blocks added over time that form the framework that is the United States. This chain can be forked under certain conditions described by Hairy somewhere previously in this thread I believe.


US constitution has been hardforked how many times?
I want US Classic. Not these amended altcoin constitutions.



552. Post 31836535 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on March 08, 2018, 07:35:46 AM
You guys play blindman's bluff until the cows come home. My eyes are wide open
BMB!  WAKE UP!  you're dreaming again.  Same nightmare as before?



It's buff, not bluff. 'Buff' meaning a push/shove. Unless you also want to suggest that the market has been a 'damp squid' recently.

BTC was badly overbought at ~$20k. Gox coins just fed into the fall that was due already, and possibly catalysed the odd local drop. A buff in the right direction, if you like.



553. Post 31920781 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on March 09, 2018, 01:22:17 PM
Once you have more than you can carry it is time to diversify.

I can carry one hell of a lot of BTC.

the last time I tried to carry 2K OzT I pulled something in my back.

 It's 'cause you got too greedy and went with the Troy system.  See, if you had gone with the Avoirdupois system that would have been a manageable weight for short hauls.  Hope it wasn't silver.... The value of that woudnt have covered your medical bills!


I see what you did there, taking the opportunity to casually backhand the anti-Semite on your way past. Merit worthy.



554. Post 31930583 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: jojo69 on March 09, 2018, 03:59:23 PM
Man, the more I think about it, if I was that Gox trustee motherfucker, I'd be god dammed careful exactly who was cooking my puffer fish if you know what I mean.

Yep. That guy was naive, lazy and irresponsible towards Gox's creditors and the wider community. Wouldn't surprise me if some Goxers started a suit against him. And others might explore other avenues of redress.
Wouldn't want to be him right now.



555. Post 31932268 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: Ivor Biggun on March 09, 2018, 04:25:21 PM
Man, the more I think about it, if I was that Gox trustee motherfucker, I'd be god dammed careful exactly who was cooking my puffer fish if you know what I mean.

Yep. That guy was naive, lazy and irresponsible towards Gox's creditors and the wider community. Wouldn't surprise me if some Goxers started a suit against him. And others might explore other avenues of redress.
Wouldn't want to be him right now.

Are you sure about that?

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/bitcoin-gox/

Quote
According to Kobayashi’s most recent status report on the Mt. Gox bankruptcy, dated Sept. 27, as trustee he has received 163.7 million yen, or about $1.4 million, in fees since his appointment.

That's nice for him, but a lawsuit could cost him a lot of that and even more in stress. Plus for the other lot, a hit costs a few thousand USD. If I thought my life was truly threatened, I'd want a lot more than $1.4m.



556. Post 31975655 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

2013 saw a bubble and fast recovery, then another bubble just a few months later. The speed of the drop and the apparent bottoming out at $6k suggests the same here - at least, it argues against 2014's slow grind.



557. Post 32077680 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 11, 2018, 03:38:01 PM

Quitting is not an action. Smoking is. All you need to do to quit is to not do anything. To smoke you need to acquire tobacco and fire, light the cigarette and inhale. Unless you're actively smoking, you've already quit. Just don't start again.


Very Zen. I can see that might apply to a whole load of other things. "I am no longer an alcoholic", "I don't cheat", "I'm not a murderer". Smiley

Re: the despairy bearishness that is seeping in here: I like it, as to me that's a nice contrarian indicator. Is there a good reason to think that giant capitulation candle on 6 Feb actually wasn't?



558. Post 32361193 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Someone can create a nicer version than me with MS Paint. But I thought this was instructive.



Very similar pattern, just on an accelerated timeframe.

If the psychology plays out as it did in 2014, we'll be done in a couple of months. $6k will be a decent price and $4k just about the ultimate bargain.

It's worth saying that awareness and infrastructure are very, very different today. Also that humans' capacity for greed and fear are not.



559. Post 32516832 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: pacman7331 on March 17, 2018, 12:57:23 PM
thats the spirit

market declines - go short - bitfinex pumps - get rekt
market increases  - go long - bitfinex dumps - get rekt

so just do the opposite of what you normally think  Cheesy

That is almost by definition how to succeed. I can't remember who said it, but the market's job is to make fools of as many people as possible. Going against the herd is pretty smart.



560. Post 32537664 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: Elwar on March 17, 2018, 05:19:05 PM
I hate to say it but this looks like another long term downtrend like we get after all of the huge spikes in price.

It might end up that we have to wait until late 2019 for a reversal as we start to near the next halving.

Either way I will hodl because trying to time the market and play like a trader has never done well for me. It's always been best to just buy and hodl.

We will shoot up past $19k probably in 2020 but until then, get ready for the long winter.

It correlates very well (suspiciously well in fact) with the 2013 bubble aftermath. However, the timeline is hugely accelerated, meaning we're almost at the bottom of it already. By my reckoning, it will take a maximum of two more months to bottom out, assuming it hasn't already. The massive volumes we saw on 6 Feb  at $6k will be hard to beat and I'm still in two minds whether that's likely to get broken again.

http://telegra.ph/Inferno-market-outlook-The-Double-Bubble-Analysis-03-16



561. Post 32542230 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: RayX12 on March 17, 2018, 06:14:58 PM
...... FUD

It correlates very well (suspiciously well in fact) with the 2013 bubble aftermath. However, the timeline is hugely accelerated, meaning we're almost at the bottom of it already. By my reckoning, it will take a maximum of two more months to bottom out, assuming it hasn't already. The massive volumes we saw on 6 Feb  at $6k will be hard to beat and I'm still in two minds whether that's likely to get broken again.

http://telegra.ph/Inferno-market-outlook-The-Double-Bubble-Analysis-03-16


wow!  LOOK AT THAT GRAPH!

The bottom is in... me thinks!

Go BITCOIN GO

I wouldn't want to say it's a done deal yet. And even if $6k was the bottom, doesn't mean we won't dip near it again.
It does look like the worst is over though, as you'd expect at this point in a correction, and the next 2 months could well see some excellent opportunities for accumulation.

If someone has better art skills and access to the data they need, I'd be interested to see how the last 4 bubbles correlate. Nov 2013 and Dec 2017's aftermaths have been incredibly similar so far. Says a lot about human psychology.



562. Post 32609669 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: Anon136 on March 18, 2018, 04:59:03 PM

Here is an article with a nicly overlayed chart but at 3x speed.

http://telegra.ph/Inferno-market-outlook-The-Double-Bubble-Analysis-03-16

Credit to who ever posted this in the thread earlier.

Cheers Smiley
It's also worth comparing against April 2013's aftermath. That one bottomed out in 3 months.
I won't call this one other than to say given the correlation so far, I struggle to see more than another 2 months downward, maximum. That's if we haven't already seen the bottom at $6k, 6 weeks ago.




563. Post 32614093 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: d_eddie on March 18, 2018, 06:11:45 PM
Who thinks that the situation can be summarized with a message like "Papas & mamas, dumb newcomers, please sell everything off before 5k! Doom! Doom! Cool"?

Well, yes : and reasons : 

Price/      Time/    Volume/

Targets are mutually combined and partly exclusive.  This is advanced trading logic.

By example in this case:

IF  volume gets high enough, it will absolve price from getting low enough.

IF time elapsed (at say, low price level) is sufficient, it makes up for lower volume... in this case we are talking many months at the lows.

IF  price gets low enough, it can mark the bottom (ie spike low).

So therefore , price target cannot be set in stone where volume and time can vary so much.  Of course nobody can make precise predictions, but you will find that highs and lows over many markets long term have these peculiar properties of P/T/V .

Aha! Great insight! In other words, what counts is mainly the sum of volume * price... right?
I'd never seen it from this angle, but it makes a lot of sense.

One thing I like about this place is that there's always something to take away. At least for me.

One way or another, the situation is "sufficient people have decided that $x is a good price that they won't let it go lower."



564. Post 32679568 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

There's some talk of a looming Death Cross (50/200 daily MA crossover) from 'pro' analysts. If there's manipulation afoot it's probably to avoid that, which would happen above around $9k in the coming week.



565. Post 32680297 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: bitserve on March 19, 2018, 02:51:34 PM
There's some talk of a looming Death Cross (50/200 daily MA crossover) from 'pro' analysts. If there's manipulation afoot it's probably to avoid that, which would happen above around $9k in the coming week.

Yup. It was about to happen at the end of this week... right now, with a little more pump it will be avoid or could even look as a bounce on it. Donno if it is "manipulation" or pure market dynamics... but it's refreshing at this time.

P.S.: Also, many times a death cross is followed by an inmediate golden cross, especially when the cross happens so near to the "bottom". ANyway... fuck TA.

I don't rate it as an indicator, especially at this point in the crypto market cycle. But it's not a little suspicious that as that TA hits the news, a mystery pump pushes it towards the safety zone.



566. Post 33034069 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on March 24, 2018, 05:47:49 AM
Bitcoin is showing strength as the market has moved beyond $8.9k and seems intent on climbing higher. I expect consolidation down to $8.6k over the next few hours and then a possible push to $9.3k and perhaps beyond.
#dyor #btfd





A plunge at the 200 daily MA was always likely. If it pushes above it this time things should get more interesting. Right now it's pretty much touch and go I'd say.



567. Post 33348611 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: Asrael999 on March 28, 2018, 08:36:44 AM


Well theres basically two possibilities here and the blue line would be the extent of "going back into bull mode"
Confirmed , but someone will still try to claim that we're not rhyming with 2014.   

Half the time this board feels like a collection of 1990 Go West fans.

If we're rhyming then the bottom will be around $4k. I'm not sure how easy $6k will be to break given the 'capitulation' candles in February.
Another interesting factor is the amount of volume on GDAX. It's a lot higher now. That suggests institutional/smart(er) money is coming in to me.



568. Post 33908306 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: bakasabo on April 04, 2018, 09:41:52 AM
Just for laugh, did you read this The World’s Worst Crypto Article of All-Time ?

Just take a short glance on 5 reasons author of the article wrote.

Yes, I saw this and thought it was hilariously bad on so many levels.

Hopefully with slightly more credibility, I'm updating the discussion on this from a couple of weeks back: http://telegra.ph/Double-Bubble-Analysis-update-04-03



The correlation has been pretty good so far and still appears to be on track. It will come unstuck sooner or later, of course (the beginning of the bubbles don't match, and the ends probably won't either). I'm still not sure whether $6k was the worst of it back in February or whether we'll see $4-5k again. Either way I'd think the downtrend's days are numbered.



569. Post 34307231 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on April 09, 2018, 03:03:05 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psikhushka
In the West we just send our undesirables into politics or higher ed. (especially Cambridge)

You mis-spelled 'Oxford'.



570. Post 39366268 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.57h):

Quote from: Torque on June 04, 2018, 02:03:04 PM


I do like Hayek's approach. Particularly apt since it looks like Sunday's once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for monetary reform in Switzerland will be voted down.



571. Post 39417063 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.57h):

Quote from: Dakustaking76 on June 05, 2018, 07:50:26 AM
BTC related question:


I geus were on a correction? From €66xx back to €63xx

Damn when are we going to explode upwards

Long term rising support line at ~€6,000. Climbing at a little more than €200 per week.
Resistance around €6,800.
So probably 2-3 weeks, maximum, before something significant has to happen.

(I converted $ to € for you but not sure what 2-3 weeks is in European equivalent. Do you guys use metric or Unix time?)



572. Post 40154390 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.58h):

Quote from: Panthers52 on June 15, 2018, 06:26:37 AM
I read through the Tether manipulation paper. IMO it made two convincing points:

#1 Someone has a habit of doing this:
 - Issuing new USDT
 - Within days, moving that USDT to BitFinex, Bittrex, and/or Poloniex
 - Using that USDT to buy crypto (seemingly a portfolio of BTC & others). They especially like to buy crypto when the price is just below whole numbers.
 - Moving the resulting crypto back to BitFinex
 - Rarely or never selling the crypto for USDT again
 
The authors argue that this is Tether/BitFinex themselves, and I think that this is in fact the most likely explanation. But the authors didn't address the alternative possibility of this being a particularly ham-fisted whale who is a close partner of Tether.
Bitfinex has been tailoring their operations over the past year and a half or so to appeal to institutions, and apparently have attracted a decent number of institutional customers. Also, if you believe their published orderbook, their BTC/fiat orderbook is by far the most liquid among exchanges. Bitfinex also has an OTC trading desk that apparently has been fairly successful (when a trader buys BTC via OTC from bitfinex, then the OTC trading desk will be effectively short BTC [at an above market basis], and will need to buy BTC to cover their position).

With the above being said (using made up numbers), if someone wanted to 5000 BTC at no more than 102% of the current trading price, they might be able to buy up 4000 BTC on the bitfinex orderbook at that price, but if the orderbook of poloniex and bittrex are also used, they might be able to buy the entire 5000 BTC they want. This could be done by an institutional trader, or by bitfinex themselves to cover an effective short position caused by an OTC trade.

Unfortunately, I am unable to account for the month end price decline issue. Maybe this is noise, maybe there is some other explanation, or maybe the authors are right. I would tend to think this is probably noise.  


I've thought for a long time that USDT is almost certainly a scam, and this paper makes me think so even more. Though I was actually a little surprised that this provides evidence (via the end-of-month trading) that USDT ever had any real USD.
Bitmex published a research report on tether this past February in which they found a bank in Puerto Rico they believe is likely holding the USD deposits of tether and bitfinex, as according to publicly available data (that I believe is not available in real time), had USD deposits grow at rates above the growth of USDT in circulation.

Further, tether has shown what is nearly proof of funds in the amount of ~$442 million as of September 2017, which exceeded the amount of USDT in circulation at the time.

The late months of Mt Gox showed what happens when customers are unable to withdraw USD from an exchange -- the price trades at a premium to other exchanges. Gox customers would deposit BTC into their Gox account, sell their BTC, request a USD withdrawal, and eventually cancel their USD withdrawal use that USD to purchase BTC to withdraw and eventually deposit and sell on another exchange. In the case of bitfinex, the USD price of BTC is almost always the same (for all intents and purposes -- it is generally within 30 basis points) of other major exchanges.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

I'm almost certain that the scam is a slightly different one than originally thought.
1. Create USDT
2. Buy BTC with unbacked USDT, pumping prices
3. Sell BTC at higher prices on OTC, or GDAX
4. Bank fiat, retrospectively backing newly-created USDT
5. Ta-da! Tether is fully backed

This explains anecdotal reports of Tether/Finex bank accounts being stuffed full of cash, but also shady behaviour. They cannot audit, not because they don't have the funds but because they arrived in the wrong order.



573. Post 40369079 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.58h):

Quote from: FractalUniverse on June 18, 2018, 09:33:51 AM
r0ach  activity increased -  usually means fairly bullish.
bearish poll results> bullish
increasing bearish mood on the forum- bullish
unfilled  futures gap - bullish
chart technically due for small up corection - slightly bullish
me trying to make up reasons for price rise - bearish..

conclusion. we will likely go up this week


We need badly spelled troll messages with the same two-colour chart posted repeatedly. We need igorr.
Or shroomskit, with his particular brand of trolling.
When they disappear, you know it's on.



574. Post 41378879 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.00h):

http://telegra.ph/Mystery-green-object-spotted-on-bitcoin-charts-07-02



575. Post 41820239 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.00h):

'Golden cross' is typically taken as a very significant indicator of long-term trend and is daily 200/50 MA. We're still a long way from that.
On the 4h, a cross of the 200/50 is imminent, which is a bullish signal for the shorter term.
It's a lagging indicator, and I expect it would take another 2-4 months to see a golden cross even if the markets have turned around.



576. Post 41848298 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.00h):

Quote from: mindrust on July 09, 2018, 03:24:04 PM

But that's not the only reason why I am buying. BTC is still a good buy even if it moves sideways for the next 5 years. I like the idea carrying all your wealth with you where ever you go. Just memorize your seed and your brain is your bank.

I strongly recommend you do not carry all of it in your head.
https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1015945799652474880



577. Post 41894447 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.00h):

Quote from: ccminer.net on July 10, 2018, 09:53:37 AM
price manipulation at its finest

Got to say that was a good one. Wait for MA cross. Wait for inverse H&S to near completion. Wait for sentiment across TA commentators to pick up.
Then dump.



578. Post 41960315 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.00h):

Quote from: ophyrim on July 11, 2018, 10:35:03 AM

why do you think the growth is linear? here is a curve I have created. This curve is very primitive of course (I spent 2 min. for it) but it is very clear that the increase of the price is not linear.

by the wayr^2=0.886, which means the prediction model is 88% accurate.



Help me out here, I've missed something.
If that curve is maintained and roughly predicts future price, BTC is never hitting $20k again.
If not, it's inaccurate right now and so no good at predicting future price anyway.



579. Post 41964653 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.00h):

Quote from: mindrust on July 11, 2018, 11:52:45 AM

why do you think the growth is linear? here is a curve I have created. This curve is very primitive of course (I spent 2 min. for it) but it is very clear that the increase of the price is not linear.

by the wayr^2=0.886, which means the prediction model is 88% accurate.



Help me out here, I've missed something.
If that curve is maintained and roughly predicts future price, BTC is never hitting $20k again.
If not, it's inaccurate right now and so no good at predicting future price anyway.


How did you figure that out? Even if we follow this line, it still very well may hit $20k and above.

Don't you see there are "anomalies" every once in a while here and there?


To me it looked like that curve was flattening to an extent that it would never hit the top data points again.
Edit: not talking about bubbles/anomalies here. Tracking that curve suggests that stable $20k+ prices will not occur.



580. Post 42016513 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on July 12, 2018, 08:12:31 AM
Everything is roses. Why are you people always so down? We're still up from a year ago. Or whatever Roll Eyes

How am I going to sell enough Bitcorn to support myself and Rick, both, for early retirement, at these prices ?!??

Everything IS NOT OK, man.

You were right to sell when you did. Alas, you probably should have unloaded the whole bucket and never looked back.

Live and learn?

There's a choreography to these things. It's potentially completing a nice bullish inverse h&s and set for reversal. Or it's heading for the abyss.
The fun bit is you don't know until it's too late.



581. Post 42018090 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on July 12, 2018, 09:10:06 AM
There's a choreography



 Cool

Hey, you're actually pretty good!



582. Post 44059605 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Wouldn't want to call BTC short term. But I am leveraged long on popcorn for the Bitmain IPO.



583. Post 44453729 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Quote from: Samarkand on August 21, 2018, 10:36:44 AM
...
-shilling for Goldman and other scammers

Quote
Circle's USD Coin will run on the Ethereum blockchain - the distributed ledger technology underlying cryptos...



The author really has no clue whatsoever if he claims that Ethereum is "the distributed ledger
technology underlying cryptos".
He should have at least rephrased it to "the distributed centralized ledger technology underlying 99.8 % of all ICO scams".

Circle´s plan looks like a terrible idea, too. What could possibly go wrong by running
a stablecoin on the buggy Ethereum blockchain, which already has a size of more than
a terabyte and no plan for scaling.

Quote
It will allow money to move at the speed of light around the world for free, but also offer binding,
verifiable contracts, enabling anyone to do business together.

Yes, because Ethereum is known for its binding contracts  Roll Eyes

Quote
Fruit sellers on the streets in Zimbabwe could accept your digital payment via an app," he says.
"Their fiat money is almost worthless, but they could receive tokens in seconds and sell them very easily for a small commission."

Yeah, this seems like a viable use case. Zimbabwean fruit sellers were the killer app that crypto needed all along!

Quote
Say I have a house in downtown Saigon worth $1m," says Mr Hoang. "I could tokenise it and sell those tokens on the global crypto market.
You could issue a billion pieces of your house if you wanted. Then people would start trading them, just like shares in a real estate investment trust.

A stable-coin scam on top of a real estate scam  Grin

The whole article is a disgrace for the BBC. I could have easily picked various other
quotes that make absolutely laughable claims that are at odds with reality.

Discard BBC, buy BTC.




I also read that article first thing and had a slightly more charitable assessment. If you squint a little and it's before your morning coffee, it's possible to believe for several seconds that the writer did more than 5 minutes research. The quality of crypto journalism feels like it's 2014 all over again.
Off to buy some Paycoin from Cryptsy, back in 2018.



584. Post 44455715 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on August 21, 2018, 11:30:50 AM
Twitter is buzzing about shorts... what's this all about?
https://datamish.com/d/000000004/btcusd?refresh=20s&orgId=1
12.8k net shorts just like in April
hopium-smoking bulls expect a big old short squeeze again

Shorts are at a year-high, and shorts:longs is also almost at a high.
I.e. the market as a whole is betting heavily that BTC will fall.
However the 'wisdom of crowds' tends towards somewhat stupid, and 'the market exists to make fools of as many people as possible' (can't find a source for that quote but it's logically correct). When everyone thinks it's going down, the sellers have already made their moves and have run out of firepower.
So a short squeeze is not off the cards. However, as Max implies, if longs were at an all-time high the bulls would take that as bullish too. Smiley

Edit: found it. Bernard Baruch. "The main purpose of the stock market is to make fools of as many men as possible."



585. Post 45322833 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: vroom on September 07, 2018, 08:25:54 AM

This news had nothing to do with the drop.

So why this drop  Huh

More people wanted to sell than buy at those prices.

"more people" is a wrong definition. A single whale can move the price.

That massive stash of Silk Road-linked coins moving to Finex/Binance might have had something to do with it.



586. Post 45325528 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: LoyceV on September 07, 2018, 09:07:31 AM
~110 000 BTC which influences a market of ~17 250 000 BTC ? Mhhh not sure ...  Roll Eyes
Try selling 1% of any stock, see what happens!

Especially a thinly-traded one. Finex's 24h volume is 73k BTC. Weekly vol 572k BTC. Dump a few k into that in the space of minutes, which is what happened earlier this week, and I think you'll see the influence it has.



587. Post 47522675 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on November 02, 2018, 03:01:48 PM
Interesting, I think when I finally start cashing large portions of my HODLING’s I’m going to have to try & emigrate. I am not willing to pay 45% tax on what I sell.

Good job you only have to pay 20% then. You're welcome to pay the extra 25% voluntarily. That'll fund another council bum wiper for me.

So you’re right - https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/money/experts/article-5019947/amp/Do-pay-tax-sell-bitcoin-big-profit.html

I have to admit I’ve never declared anything I’ve sold, (please don’t track me down HMRC - good luck on that though Wink) I assumed it was 45% tax here as it’d be a lot to sell GBP wise.
This makes me very happy, thanks.



Nope, cap gains is 20% in UK. If you earned large amounts then you'll be in the 45% bracket but if you're cashing out some long-term holdings then it's CGT not income tax.
Remember too that you have a £11,500 CGT allowance (might be a little more this tax year) and that if you have a spouse you can also use their unused CGT allowance.
I just filed and paid my tax return, having taken significant pains to account for everything. I'm still living in fear of an audit because there's no way HMRC understand this stuff and a bunch of exchanges from 2014-15 are defunct, so proving I've acted honestly would be well-nigh impossible.
Posts like yours encourage me, because I know HMRC has limited resources. So it's a bit like the old joke:
Two guys are in the jungle when they see a lion running towards them. Frantically, one of the men starts putting on his running shoes.
Surprised, the other man says " What are you thinking, you can't outrun a lion!!!"
" I don't have to outrun the lion," said the man, " I just have to outrun you."



588. Post 47523013 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: julian071 on November 02, 2018, 04:14:11 PM
Is there really a country in this world where you can just cash out and nobody will even think of telling you to pay tax on your newfound wealth?

Here in NL you only pay tax on the amount you own, irrespective if it's in BTC or cash. You get taxed 1.2% over the value of all your belongings on the first of january of that year, so that's everything in cash, crypto, bank accounts minus all your debt and minus 25k euro untaxed amount. Cashing out and trading are not taxable events.

So this year I will have to pay taxes on what my stash was worth the first of january =(. Luckily the percentage is very low.

That's a weird system. Kind of like inflation or a negative interest rate on all of your net worth.



589. Post 47523132 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: julian071 on November 02, 2018, 04:19:04 PM
Is there really a country in this world where you can just cash out and nobody will even think of telling you to pay tax on your newfound wealth?

Here in NL you only pay tax on the amount you own, irrespective if it's in BTC or cash. You get taxed 1.2% over the value of all your belongings on the first of january of that year, so that's everything in cash, crypto, bank accounts minus all your debt and minus 25k euro untaxed amount. Cashing out and trading are not taxable events.

So this year I will have to pay taxes on what my stash was worth the first of january =(. Luckily the percentage is very low.

That's a weird system. Kind of like inflation or a negative interest rate on all of your net worth.


It does work like that, but it's not unreasonable imho to tax accumulated riches.

But if you look at it differently, you get a 1.2% discount if you buy a Ducati from your stash.

That's a fair point. Possibly has much the same purpose as sub-zero interest rates, i.e. discourage holding unproductive wealth.



590. Post 48239758 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: bitcoinminer42 on November 26, 2018, 11:03:33 AM


Looks like a falling wedge to me.  This is a reversal pattern which should indicate a break to the upside.  Quite bearish if we manage to break to the downside.  

https://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:chart_analysis:chart_patterns:falling_wedge_reversal

ehm... check your drawings plz  Cheesy

I'd call it more of a bearish descending triangle to match the last couple and complete the set.



591. Post 48272759 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.16h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on November 27, 2018, 03:01:42 PM
it puts the hat on its avatar or else it gets the hose again

I rarely wear hats. I never wear hose.



592. Post 48520823 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Short squeeze/reaction rally is quite normal at this point. Let's not get ahead of ourselves.



593. Post 48604951 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: rebal15 on December 11, 2018, 05:08:37 PM
What about you mic? You are one of the most positive people on Bitcoin and for sure a convinced hodler but... are you BUYING right now?

i play for the coins .... my way for accumulation long term, and till now my fastest way as well, if any of my friends would sell for cash i buy instantly, as my good friend has sent FIAT as well to exchanges to BUY....

my last session of little more as a month ago was a sizeable amount that i did won so increased my stash right there....
this last two weeks i didn't buy any FIAT into BTC
but i'm looking to buy some between now and lower as well cause prices are just becoming a to big of opportunity.

also know i can play with people for fiat (poker) but just always playing for BTC cause it has been my best way to accumulate and as long that i'm doing good i will keep doing this as my main way to increase, also what i have on the cold storage is not leaving anymore, so if i would lose on this low prices, then i would absolute transfer FIAT to buy cheap BTC's and pay them out....

will be looking to transfer FIAT as well cause not many that i know are selling now for cash..... Roll Eyes



Good busy.

I'm waiting for fiat to buy more, should be before the end of the month.

Also daytrading some alts on order to accumulate more.

Really necessary, because I sold a great part of my stash to buy the Ducati and lost a lot on a long during this crash, no longer a member of the 21-club, by far. Will take a lot to get to be a member again.

Also daytrading some alts on order to accumulate more.  Cool

buying BTC on bear market, c'est vraiment stupide

Right. Should have gone all-in 12 months ago when it was a bull market.



594. Post 48856340 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.22h):

Quote from: bitserve on December 24, 2018, 05:55:03 AM
Its interesting if you look at Bitcoin on the weekly, this looks like capitulation more so than it does in 2015 on the weekly.

[]https://imgur.com/a/WtBg4b7[/img]


You are too new to be lecturing us.

Grow up a bit first, and maybe start a bit more slowly by introducing yourself.   



JJG, give some margin to the newcomers, it is not that he is shilling or anything... and introducing himself is not mandatory.

Newcomer says something vaguely interesting.
JJG, who has never said a single useful thing in the FIVE YEARS he's been here, rips into him.
This is why I've had him on ignore for years.
Sometimes, there just isn't enough irony in the world.



595. Post 48971429 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: gentlemand on December 30, 2018, 05:21:30 PM
How large and corpulent as compared to the Belgian Health Minister?

As with most larger laydeez I'm sure she's very 'caring' and what more do you want from a health minister?

Health.



596. Post 49023692 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Bitcoin has already become a more popular store of value than silver, and that's after an 80% slide in price.
Gold is still some way ahead and likely will be for a few more years. I like it, but it's pretty inflexible when it comes to it.
But silver vs BTC? Hasn't that one already been settled by the numbers?



597. Post 49024031 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: Cryptotourist on January 03, 2019, 09:07:49 AM
Why do I get the feeling that something is up for later this afternoon.
Like an instant spike to the moon and back - or not.
Probably delusional. Haven't really made sense of the "proof of keys" thing. Always ambiguous when herd mentality comes in to play.

@r0achie I think you want to buy BTC in the dip, so that you can finally get that silver pressure cooker you've always wanted. Wink


I doubt proof of keys will come to anything. Anyone who cares already keeps their BTC off-exchange. And very few will pass up trading opportunities to move their funds to their own control anyway - assuming they even know how.



598. Post 49057276 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 05, 2019, 02:23:59 AM
Just curious... What you guys would say is the probability YOU give to Bitcoin to be over $10.000 at any moment during the next 4 years? honestly.

High. But I think it's going to be long road with much adversity. Despite it being half the ATH, I think a return to five figures will be the equivalent of getting back over $1000 and that was a three year grind. It'll be a huge hump that needs taking out and once it is a great deal of confidence will flow back in from the outside.

That's basically what I think. Being my idea of high 80%+

Yeah, once $10K is reached that would mean a great deal of confidence as you say.

High. But $6k will be the line in the sand. Probably the strongest resistance bitcoin has ever established. After that goes, $10k will be relatively easy.



599. Post 49065468 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: vroom on January 05, 2019, 04:30:26 PM
wtf, more and more people are arguing with roach. at least stop quoting him or risk getting ignored by the rest of us WO's.

^^^ Please.
This place can be vaguely entertaining and informative when the drivel is removed.



600. Post 49084420 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

R0ach is to 2018/19 what Shroomskit was to 2014/15. Discuss.
Shrooms vanished shortly after capitulation, claiming he sold the bounce and bought PMs. You never know...



601. Post 49101632 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

There once was a trader named Sean,
Who haplessly shorted the corn.
"And now I am fecked,
"My portfolio rekt,
"And I wish I had never been born."



602. Post 49132364 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: rebal15 on January 09, 2019, 10:04:06 AM

consider dolls better than women is a lack of respect for women. And you judge us on what we say.

You should delete you fucking post.

That article speaks for itself. You should delete yourself.


Back on-topic, the gold narrative is interesting, especially in the light of BTC overtaking silver as a SoV.

Quote from: Toxic2040 on January 09, 2019, 07:33:12 AM
1 to 5 trillion dollars flowing into Bitcoin is a modest estimation  Shocked


I think so too.

Quote
Today in 2018, there is approximately 2.5 billion oz of Gold Bullion and 4 billion oz of Silver Bullion in the world. At current gold spot prices, there is about $3.3 trillion USD in gold bullion in the world, while there is just under $70 billion USD in silver bullion being held by global investors and governments.

Respectively both these silver and gold bullion valuation sums (especially with silver bullion) are dwarfed by the total valuations for debts, real estate, fiat currencies, and derivatives worldwide.

I've put together some research about 'fundamentals' for gold/BTC (there aren't any) and the 200 WMA as the best approximation for long-term valuation, screening out noise while keeping the signal intact. https://medium.com/blockworm/towards-a-fair-valuation-of-bitcoin-e3d172cd7ccd

For screening out noise here, of course, we have the Ignore button.



603. Post 49133139 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: realr0ach on January 09, 2019, 10:54:05 AM

What a complete dumbass.

I am a bit shocked myself. I could have sworn you were on Ignore. I just don't know how that happened.
I've rectified my mistake and will buy 1oz of silver as penance.
Then I'll sell it for an instant 40% loss thanks to horrendous spreads and VAT.



604. Post 49136403 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 09, 2019, 01:56:12 PM

Are they 100% opening January 24th or is it going to get delayed again?

I thought the shutdown had delayed things.
And that has literally no end in sight.



605. Post 49151139 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on January 10, 2019, 08:04:33 AM
 Right JJG, this makes a lot of sense. Wink You think that worthless **** Izabella Kaminska outed herself, lol. She was devastated when I ruined her main life hobby. She actually posted more than you so I'm sure you were very happy when I slayed the miserable hag Cheesy Having her gone allowed you to be the most wordy poster in WO history Shocked Maybe you  were a Kissless Virgin alt all this time? Shocked(i can play dumb games too)


What was Kaminska's alt?
I remember NLC being outed. Turned out she really was someone living in her mom's basement.



606. Post 49155219 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

^^ I kind of feel that 200 WMA really wants to be tested, on proper volume, just to make sure.



607. Post 49189860 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on January 11, 2019, 10:08:37 PM
The bottom is probably not
We need a deep penetration
Quote
drunk

I was way to grownup to giggle at this. I didn't even see it. [/liemodecancel]
I'm also of the opinion that we need to retest the 200 WMA. Smash it or bounce off it, I can't call (it's a market, inherently unpredictable, so neither can anyone), but we need to revisit it on volume. Back in 2014 there was this myth that no cycle ever bottomed below the top of the last bubble, i.e. $266 at that point. The 200 WMA being unbreachable is the 2019 equivalent.
The Delphi Digital report was really interesting, also forecasting a bottom soon based on 1 year+ UTXOs: https://www.delphidigital.io/utxo
Not sure how that chimes with the most recent article about 3-5 year coins moving though. Could just be the final phase.




608. Post 49191345 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

^^ Not bullish. Ready for a long squeeze.



609. Post 49218341 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on January 13, 2019, 08:56:43 PM
Wall Observer thread
has turned towards poetry.
Capitulation.

A little late to the party but I heard this one recently:
Haikus are always
Heptadekasyllabic
Exactly like this.

Though I don't think the party will even start until $3200, and then it could go either way.



610. Post 49218783 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: kurious on January 13, 2019, 09:48:48 PM
Today in Krakow
Tomorrow trip to Auschwitz
Thinking about Roach

Been there and it's sobering. 

I did it so I could look fucks like roach in the eye and say 'have you even been?'. 

The banality of evil
is the truth... and good men saying nothing is what allows it to prosper.

The sheer scale of it is hard to grasp. Then you see an individual pigtail or shoe.



611. Post 49226904 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: Globb0 on January 14, 2019, 11:58:40 AM



The Telegraph acting like CoinTelegraph. [sigh]



612. Post 49244499 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Hairy - thanks for the analysis but I'm not sure that logic holds (yet).
We're still looking at lower highs, and the recent move up didn't push past the 50-day MA. Meanwhile volumes are still down on what you'd expect for a bitcoin capitulation. I'd expect weekly volumes to rival the highest-volume week of the entire downtrend, like 200k BTC on Stamp.
Not suggesting we can't have seen the bottom yet, just that in my view it's certainly unconfirmed.



613. Post 49250280 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 15, 2019, 07:29:30 PM
Hairy - thanks for the analysis but I'm not sure that logic holds (yet).
We're still looking at lower highs, and the recent move up didn't push past the 50-day MA. Meanwhile volumes are still down on what you'd expect for a bitcoin capitulation. I'd expect weekly volumes to rival the highest-volume week of the entire downtrend, like 200k BTC on Stamp.
Not suggesting we can't have seen the bottom yet, just that in my view it's certainly unconfirmed.

100% agree.  This is certainly not confirmed - it is a tentative hypothesis only.  The majority of technicals are against the bottom being in.

Really we have two choices.  Either Bitcoin price cycles are stable in length or they are getting longer.  

I am punting on the former but this is all about risk management.


Ah, cheers for the clarification. I doubt the cycles will be that different but a few days/weeks could make a lot of difference. We'll know soon.



614. Post 49257727 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 16, 2019, 07:08:15 AM

Yeah well the idea is the price gets trapped between the 200 Weekly MA (purple line) and the downtrend.  It is left with nowhere to go so gets forced up and breaks the downtrend.  But the price is still around the same level as it is today - it just tracks sideway in a range of $3250 - $4,000.

This is the scenario I see as most likely. But I won't rule out a final capitulation event, crashing below 200 WMA and coming back above it in short order.
It would feel weird to end a cycle without that. Kind of like watching a film with a deeply unsatisfactory ending like The Birds or Contact.



615. Post 49278285 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: Yaplatu on January 17, 2019, 11:11:55 AM
Exchange Security :



Erm...
Cryptopia actually got hacked. I'm pretty sure it should have a worse rating than 'B'.
I mean, I'm all for having a shot in the dark based on criteria on paper and everything, but at some point that comes up against the cold, hard reality of someone nicking all your cash.



616. Post 49278910 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 17, 2019, 11:57:52 AM


Oh, that's good.



617. Post 49298130 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: Bitcoinaire on January 18, 2019, 01:50:12 PM
#Bitcoin daily on-chain transactions grew 63% in the last 10 months. Volumes are now the same as we had during the 2017 bull run





https://twitter.com/ArminVanBitcoin/status/1086181428981846016

Including batching in 2019 - but also including Proof of Proof txs, which apparently count for ~20% of network activity or something.
Still, demand is demand.



618. Post 49320204 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 19, 2019, 09:30:22 PM

 If the Democrats refuse this deal, I fear we'll legitimately be facing a civil war situation.

 God help us all.

I'd offer to help but you lot lost the right to that when you threw that tea party back in the 18th century.
And we're kind of busy with our own impending civil war.



619. Post 49349436 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: Phil_S on January 21, 2019, 12:33:58 PM
For this to make sense, am I to assume, according to this twatter consipracy theory expert you quote, that 2 Russian GRU officers being there were merely 'visiting Salisbury to admire cathedral spire' and had nothing to do with what happened while they were there?

So far they published videos of those 2 dudes walking around Salisbury while being Russians, not much else.

Not a single video puts them on the scene of the crime. We don't see them touching the doorknob, we don't see them near the bench.

Only "walking around Salisbury" charge is 100% proven.

Agreed, it is very suspicious the Skripals didn't have a CCTV camera pointing at their doorknob. Also, it makes perfect sense two guys would fly to UK with the sole intent of seeing Salisbury Cathedral's 123-metre tall spire. It is the tallest in the country and a tourist magnet.



620. Post 49380190 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: Phil_S on January 23, 2019, 10:33:59 AM
You guys know what Max Keiser is talking about here?

https://twitter.com/maxkeiser/status/1087773964196208640

Makes sense or not?

Sure, looks like a very simple 'DIY ATM' that anyone can use. Hand over cash, merchant (or whoever) prints you out a slip with a code you can redeem into your wallet. Not sure what's going on behind the scenes but I assume it's a little more sophisticated than printing out a plaintext privkey.



621. Post 49464279 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 28, 2019, 09:08:11 AM
Going to the bank in a bit so thought I’d have a bit of fun but also do my bit tor the community



Totally merited. Hopefully I'll see one of these circulating in the future.
Does the dye stick to the new £5 and £10s?



622. Post 49465319 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 28, 2019, 10:15:52 AM

It stuck to the £10 notes. I didn’t have any £5 notes this time.

I used a good old black permanent Sharpie - £1 for 3 @ Poundland Grin

I'm totally going to start doing this.



623. Post 49465782 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: nutildah on January 28, 2019, 11:31:48 AM
In TA-related news,

Top Crypto Trader Says BTC May Go Up if it Goes Up, Go Down if it Goes Down.

https://www.newsbtc.com/2019/01/26/bitcoin-btc-could-be-gearing-up-for-a-big-move-as-sideways-trading-persists/

Quote
Although this weekend is off to an involatile start so far, Mayne, a popular cryptocurrency trader, noted in a recent tweet that Bitcoin could very well climb higher in the coming days if it is able to break above a few key levels.

“$BTC if we break above the grey block you can add or wait until a break and close above yearly open to add,” he said, with the referenced “grey block” existing around $3,650.

Mayne later noted that Bitcoin has moved closer to this region, and if it is able to break above its yearly open at approximately $3,700 it could see a price surge up to $4,000.

 Roll Eyes

That's TA in a nutshell.

That's newsBTC in a nutshell. I don't know where they get their writers but there is zero insight or accuracy.



624. Post 49511550 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on January 31, 2019, 12:23:47 AM
I feel like your charts are often pull-from-thyne-ass.  Historically bear market lows have been set before 11 months prior to each halving. We should expect the same again.

I appreciate that. I will note that for the majority of traders the greatest mistake is having expectations.

I think it's not being prepared to change their expectations on the basis of new information.

Like the 200wma. It's the talisman that the previous ath was in the last bear market. Too many people think it can't be broken. Consequently it's begging to be broken.



625. Post 49511809 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 31, 2019, 08:33:00 AM
Like the 200wma. It's the talisman that the previous ath was in the last bear market. Too many people think it can't be broken. Consequently it's begging to be broken.

I don’t think anyone is saying it can’t be broken. It was broken a number of times in 2015.

Staying deep below it is another story tho.

Well, barely, you're right. It kind of bumped along it for a while, was never deep below it for more than that capitulation spike. But it does seem to be the line in the sand a lot of people are drawing, one way or the other.



626. Post 49511990 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 31, 2019, 08:44:08 AM
Like the 200wma. It's the talisman that the previous ath was in the last bear market. Too many people think it can't be broken. Consequently it's begging to be broken.

I don’t think anyone is saying it can’t be broken. It was broken a number of times in 2015.

Staying deep below it is another story tho.

Well, barely, you're right. It kind of bumped along it for a while, was never deep below it for more than that capitulation spike. But it does seem to be the line in the sand a lot of people are drawing, one way or the other.


I am not denying that there will be a global tightening of sphincters when (if) the 200WMA is crossed.  

But it’s going to be defended like fuck.  The order book gets fatter than a Kardashian ass real fast.  

Best guess, right now, is that it reverts to 200 WMA after a capitulation spike far below. I could live with that quite happily.



627. Post 49512247 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 31, 2019, 08:56:42 AM
Best guess, right now, is that it reverts to 200 WMA after a capitulation spike far below. I could live with that quite happily.

I agree with you.  I think talk of staying down at 300WMA or 400WMA is apocalypse porn.


I like Murad's analysis and it's certainly not impossible, but it's towards the bearish end of the spectrum of realistic scenarios for me. Other end is heavy defence at ~$3,200 and only a brief dip below $3k.



628. Post 49512467 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 31, 2019, 09:15:58 AM
We have to accept the possibility of a momentary dip below previous ATH (~$1156) but that possibility is fading as we move deeper into 2019.  Has to be under 5% chance at this time.  

The bear downtrend line and the 200WMA will intersect around late March / early  April 2019.   Shit will get fucked up then if we haven’t broken the bear line by that time (which everyone has forgotten about). 


April is when Murad expects a bottom. Again, not unreasonable.
The really good news is that the bear line hits zero around August, so we'll definitely be in a bull market by autumn.



629. Post 49512967 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on January 31, 2019, 10:02:59 AM
We have to accept the possibility of a momentary dip below previous ATH (~$1156) but that possibility is fading as we move deeper into 2019.  Has to be under 5% chance at this time.  

The bear downtrend line and the 200WMA will intersect around late March / early  April 2019.   Shit will get fucked up then if we haven’t broken the bear line by that time (which everyone has forgotten about).  


April is when Murad expects a bottom. Again, not unreasonable.
The really good news is that the bear line hits zero around August, so we'll definitely be in a bull market by autumn.

We will repeatedly break the bear line sideways, rally and fall and form a new bear line.  We should do that 4 - 5 times this summer, rebounding off the 200WMA.  

is it really a weighted MA? BitcoinWisdom.com just saying it's a simple MA.

W for Weekly.



630. Post 49522538 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 31, 2019, 08:19:38 PM
Bob, what's the origin of that image?

It's pretty much one of the most important films of all time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gayniggers_from_Outer_Space
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0274518/
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/gayniggers-from-outer-space/reviews/?type=user

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLavEHYxCIk

I don't know how many minutes of this I'm going to be able to handle. But I have an evening off, and a glass of wine, and... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msL-XFs3Ggs



631. Post 49522857 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: Cassius on January 31, 2019, 08:28:47 PM

I don't know how many minutes of this I'm going to be able to handle. But I have an evening off, and a glass of wine, and... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msL-XFs3Ggs

Well, that was that. It was, in it's own way, Fabulous. Though 23:10 was a bit much.
Going to need another glass of wine.



632. Post 49530812 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: Pamoldar on February 01, 2019, 11:35:37 AM

It seems tether transaction.
https://www.omniexplorer.info/address/3PajPWymUexhewHPczmLQ8CMYatKAGNj3y
https://www.omniexplorer.info/search/9f0d403589ebab48daf99b1888ce78f03c73f67418bf2cec39093584f9fd3646

May be I am ignorant.
How both chain works together? I mean Bitcoin blockchain and tether? I never encountered this.

Bitcoin is designed for financial transactions, but that's just information stored on the blockchain. The information can be anything.
The Omni layer is a 'hack' that lets you store other information on the Bitcoin blockchain, and that information records creation, transfer etc of other tokens. Like a blockchain on top of a blockchain.

Think of it like cleaning your ears with the lid of a biro. It's generally frowned upon in polite society and it's not what biros were designed for, but it works well enough and you can't stop people doing it so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The Vicks vaporub discussion a few pages back is another example.



633. Post 50306291 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: kenzawak on March 25, 2019, 07:56:56 AM
If you wanna say "Hi" to CSW, he's here :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5120026

To bad mods already deleted the thread..


His second thread is still here though.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124203

Plus he must be bored without Twitter, we might see more of him in the next few days.

I missed this latest scammery. What's he after old empty wallets for?



634. Post 50306776 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: Globb0 on March 25, 2019, 09:00:16 AM


I missed this latest scammery. What's he after old empty wallets for?

Supposedly its so he can sign messages from them and then say, "Look, I must be Satoshi!" Here's an archive of the original thread:

https://archive.is/vLfEx

Somehow Twitter connected the cock.li email address to him, I dunno, he must have used that email service in the past or something.

Ah I'm still too naïve sometimes

Thanks, appreciate it. Will look into it further Smiley
So it was the email address someone used to connect this with Craig?



635. Post 50408118 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

KFC submitted.
Meanwhile, Ver increases BCH supply to 22 million: https://bitcoinbulletin.org/bitcoin-cash-to-increase-supply-to-22-million/
Naturally, there's only one possible response from BSV: https://cryptoinferno.org/news/craig-wright-increases-bsv-supply-23-million/



636. Post 50454841 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

$4,200 retest wouldn't surprise me. Might even say it was necessary.
In other news, Craig is due in court today.
TL;DR Hedge BTC gains, leverage long popcorn.



637. Post 50560091 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on April 11, 2019, 03:33:27 PM
What a cute CryptoCat. And just a perfect work. The picture is made professionally.

It's just awful what Craig and Calvin are trying to do to the guy.

2009: Satoshi invents Bitcoin
2019: Satoshi has his feelings hurt by a Twitter account and sues the guy who started the Lightning Torch

https://www.stopcraigwright.com/evidence

I'll take one Narrative Collapse with a side order of Lies, please.

That's a surprisingly short list.



638. Post 50578706 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: _javier_ on April 12, 2019, 04:15:16 PM
If you didnt spend 5 minutes waiting for an audio tape to load a game, you didnt live the golden age.
I miss my ZX Spectrum..All the squeaks and sounds only to end with an "R Tape Loading error"


10 Rem This is my private key

Save "wallet"

...good luck retrieving it  Grin

YES. 48k. How many hours spent watching those loading lines...?
I live in the same city as Clive. Saw him riding a C5 once, like time was going to tell on that thing and one day he'd be vindicated. Brilliant.



639. Post 50602906 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: jojo69 on April 14, 2019, 04:43:34 PM
Wondering who are thinking that we will go back to $3k 🤔

I actually think there is a good chance we will briefly see the high $2Ks in a final wave 5 shakeout.


I'm certainly not discounting that.
$5k felt like cheating. That massive buy was impressive but just one guy and we don't know his motives.



640. Post 51090227 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on May 17, 2019, 06:41:08 AM
The next parabolic bull run isn’t due this early any way, I don’t know why anybody would start panicking. We’re still 12 months away from the halving & it doesn’t usually start to get wild until some months after the halving.

We were at $3xxx not too long ago. Nothing to worry about unless we go sub $4000 imo.

Price never goes only up with no correction or time to breathe. This is normal!

This was important and expected retest of support.



641. Post 51593843 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Lauda on June 25, 2019, 07:36:47 AM
You will end up praying that the crash from $70-$100k takes us back below $20k to buy back in. Smiley We're at $11k with next-to-zero FOMO.
LOL, I think people already FOMOed with bitcoin, around $11,000. Nearly 7 months of bull run, that is too long and bitcoin has gone very far from its start. I could be wrong but I will keep my principle to stay away from FOMO, and keep my patience to be safe and have better chances. Months ago, no one believed that bitcoin would even drop to $6,000, but it actually dropped deeper than that range. From now on, I will keep waiting (taking profits of rest of my bitcoin, and waiting for chances to buy back).
Google Trends proves that you claim is incorrect. This one is due to (small sample of) institutional investors mostly (Fidelity et. al.). Taking profits into dirty FIAT is just wrong.

Google Trends and data on wallet sizes. Very little retail interest so far - it's mainly big holders who have accumulated.
Even when BTC broke $10k we saw little mainstream media interest. In 2017 the BBC and just about every other major news site ran daily articles on crypto. Almost nothing this time. I guess they still feel burned by last time.
It's starting to change, but only just getting going now.



642. Post 51607708 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Above $12k there is very little resistance to ATH and above. All the hard work has been done breaking $4k, $6k, $10k, $12k.
Which means that at this point either:
1) Moon, and then some. Or
2) This is where institutions dump on the Retail guys who are just getting brave enough to come back in after getting so badly burned in 2018.
Thoughts?



643. Post 51636726 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: nutildah on June 28, 2019, 12:56:44 PM
Does anyone want to have a local copy of this thread? I could compress all pages into a downloadable file, so you can search the raw HTML for old posts.

How big would that be? Put it in the BSV blockchain, they have gigabyte blocks. The only other thing there are weather stuff.

Don't mean to get technical on you all the sudden by I was looking into it the other day and as of right now its only possible to cram 100 KB of data into a single BSV transaction (or 4 JJG posts -- sorry JJG, you know I'm still a fan).

After they switch to 2 GB blocks, it would only take about a week of spamming their transactions with as much data as possible until the BSV blockchain grew to over 2 terabytes in size.

Needless to say, it would only be a few months of constant spam attacks before the blockchain became too unwieldy for almost anybody to manage it. Their node count would drop to near zero.

If the transaction fee was around 1 cent per tx, the attack would cost about $1,200/hr to run. Frankly I don't see why this won't eventually happen.

I would absolutely donate money to a fund that was created for the sole purpose of stuffing BSV with junk to these ends.
Someone needs to set this up.



644. Post 51690896 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: bucciarati on July 03, 2019, 06:46:17 AM

maybe they only used a letterhead...

Couple of typos and overall tone suggest that this is off-the-cuff at best. If it's legit then I imagine Zuck will read it in the smallest room and quickly put it behind him.



645. Post 51897466 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: VB1001 on July 21, 2019, 07:28:25 AM
4 hide gold in rectum, held at Visakhapatnam airport

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/visakhapatnam/4-hide-gold-in-rectum-held-at-city-airport/articleshow/69881098.cms

Officials seize $5 million in gold bars at Heathrow Airport, reportedly from drug cartel

https://www.foxnews.com/travel/police-5-million-gold-bars-heathrow-airport

Yep, gold fever returns ... Cheesy

I had to check they were different stories.
Pretty sure $5m wouldn't fit, even split 4 ways.



646. Post 52506253 (copy this link) (by Cassius) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: Wilhelm on September 20, 2019, 05:21:29 AM
fillippone with a valiant effort, but no cigar.

Moar:



Bonus clue: later in the day, within a couple hundred meters of the first:


 


The only thing that comes to mind “i’d do her”  Lips sealed

I'd be worried about the huge teeth.