All posts made by Biodom in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 9157001 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 10, 2014, 07:33:43 PM
Anybody any tips on meeting women? I'm turning 45 this winter, have no social life and haven't touched a woman in...well, a long time.


problem is solved already.

since one can assume you own bitcoins you will become filthy rich in the next 36 months.

so, relax, it may take some years, but then woman will hunt you.  Wink

You think 2 coins is enough?


2 BTC may be enough to move out of your mom's basement?

Probably 10BTC minimum will be required to ensure that you can keep some  chick happy.

Well, some people move back to moms/dads house, even when they have a job.
Reason-to save money to buy their own house. A couple of years of such savings and they have enough savings for a downpayment.
I know at least three people in their late twenties doing just this-it seems to get more and more popular because they don't save when they live in apartments, which are damned expensive even here; if NY-forget about it (savings).



2. Post 9159319 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.22h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on October 11, 2014, 12:31:03 AM
Basically, your solution is start drinking?

Best solution ever Cheesy

(kidding,  its sound advise, would be useful for me too except I am still reeling from the last time I got dumped.)

Alcohol gives a kind confidence by removing social anxiety, but it doesn't necessarily give you positivity. Positivity, or at least a total lack of negativity, is golden when it comes to doing well with women, especially quality women.

How this could be done. This is before the party...(you can ignore before 1:25 as it is blah blah blah)
cannot find "at the party" video-it is even better as far as I recall as far as dialog is concerned
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa1IN1GN4Q4



3. Post 9213852 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: Moria843 on October 15, 2014, 06:29:07 PM
Must feel awful to have money in the stock market this month. Value plummeting every single day. But...

bitcoin users not affected!

I'm buying stocks today. All you need to know about stocks is what you learn from "Trading Places" with Eddie Murphy and Dan Ackroid. When everyone is buying like crazy you sell; when they're selling like crazy you buy.

This thesis does not work in a secular bear market.
Check out 1929-1932 in US (whoever was panic selling during 1929 basically still sold almost at the top as long as they did not buy back until mid 1932) or Japan 1989-2012 (23 years!!!)



4. Post 9278411 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.25h):

Quote from: touhonoob on October 21, 2014, 02:04:16 PM
apple pay is only available on apple products right?

the products that even most rich westerners finance because they can't blow $600 on a phone

yeah thats gonna take over the world where global average income is like $200 a month lol
There is nothing new with Apple Pay.
Google wallet was created two years ago with the same concept.


except, [almost]nobody used it and credit cards were NOT on board for Google play, but they ARE on board for Apple pay



5. Post 16662353 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

^^ are you a programmer? If yes, OK, I will listen. If it is just describing "our group" vs "their gang", sorry, not interested.



6. Post 16846255 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on November 11, 2016, 04:51:17 PM
Good morning Bitcoinland.

Still sidling along in the $720 range I see... $719 on Bitcoinaverage.

Seems the US election was no big deal after all.

Hopefully we'll see a rise soon.



I'm curious about the Salma Hayek images that you've posted many times. Any specially symbolism involved or do you just like her? Is it her acting? Her cleavage? Huh

I think that his message is "boobs matter", which is true even from a pure biology point of view  Grin



7. Post 16957777 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on November 22, 2016, 08:02:57 PM
The wall was for exactly 1000 btc. We need higher prices to see more impressive walls.

Sometimes the biggest walls are at lower prices.

Remember the epic Bearwhale wall in Oct 2014? That was 30,000 coins at $300 per.

OR, it could have been a large bull who simply tested the market's downside.
Remember Jesse Livermore? As per "Reminiscences of a Stock Operator" (ageless book).
He always put in a large sell order to see how market reacts before starting accumulation on the long side.



8. Post 17589502 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on January 22, 2017, 09:30:53 PM
i do expect that the price of bitcoin will trade betweem $850 and $950 for some time,

I don't think so. Too many people want to have at least one bitcoin.

true, and not even every millionaire (denominated in $) could have one. there are more millionaires existing than bitcoin.

This is a great fact.

Half of 1.4 million Chinese millionaires want to leave China within 5 years, not sure if it would be possible, though.
All millionaires =58.7 trillion in wealth.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/23/news/economy/asian-millionaires-wealth/
Even if they allocate just 1% to bitcoin (a fraction of gold), bitcoin's market cap would be 587 bil or currently about $36400/btc.
Chinese exchanges discussing starting trading in mBTC (1/1000) is a first step.
https://twitter.com/bobbyclee/status/823000703660457986
At some point even millionaires will be reduced to buying fractions of btc, if btc will remain the main crypto.



9. Post 17589560 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: petahashminer on January 22, 2017, 11:04:19 PM
difficulty has changed 10 minutes ago,

and it seems huge

Jan 22 2017    392,963,262,344    16.64%    2,812,940,600 GH/s

will it be affect the price ?


short term-no
long term-yes, on the upside



10. Post 17598093 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 23, 2017, 02:54:17 PM

We likely need some term that is between millionnaire and billionnaire, anyhow because through inflation of the dollar, it has become a bit too easy to become a millionnaire, but it does not mean the same that it did 20 years ago.  With the inflation of recent times, maybe having $10 million in wealth would have a bit more of a meaningful significance as compared with the mere millionnaire status.

Finally, I do understand the point about not every millionnaire or whatever can have a whole bitcoin, but it still remains a bit of a silly point to me... because there are a lot of things that not everyone can have and it becomes a kind of so what, even if it is making a point about upside price potential of BTC when we already have some folks hoarding 100s or even thousands of coins, and other folks with a much smaller means, of course, struggling to build up their bitcoin holdings to even one coin (I doubt that all of those strugglers are teenagers, too)


Good writeup.
Few points in addition:
1. In US, you have to have $6.8 mil to be in 1% by wealth, $400000-500000/year household salary to be that in salary department.
However, worldwide, your household has to make just above $32000 to be in 1% world-wide, but in US you would be below average (average is $52K).
2. having $1 mil in liquid assets in US is nice, but it would definitely not make you rich by any stretch of imagination.
3. reddit has an interesting blurb about push in establishing "crime of unexplained wealth". I can only imagine how difficult it would be to "explain" your wealth if bitcoin is over 40K, which is very realistic. People with even small incomes could have large gains if they bought early and even $920 is early if it goes to 40K within 5-10 years. Paradoxically, I really hope for 1099-B like forms as long as they are accurate (this would be critical).



11. Post 17709644 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: toknormal on February 02, 2017, 04:39:06 PM

Thats it.

We have now transited permanently into the realm of 4-figure BTC, never to return.

We will never again see sub $1000 BTC. Double top on the 12-hour, concluded 3-year consolidation from last ATH. Games now going with serve and increments of $100 Wink



next step, we will be trading in mbtc as default so newbs are not scared of "high" prices  Grin.
china will switch over very soon.



12. Post 17709668 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

^^^I am entertained for sure, was not expecting prices above $1000 for at least a couple of months.
We basically zig-zagged and NOT truly consolidated (so far).



13. Post 17711011 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 02, 2017, 06:12:23 PM
Doubling in price in half the time pattern essentially still holding for this exponential bull run ... late March 1600-1800, mid-May 3200-3600, early June insane vertical up to 6500-7200 and pop. For approximate repeat of 2013 halving bull adoption wave blow-off.

Pop? Higher or $7000 as a blowoff top?



14. Post 17767891 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on February 07, 2017, 02:16:30 PM
Why 1337 $ ??
For me will be a little lower than 1100

what matters is to top the previous high.

Getting over the previous gox high of $1242 is what matters.

^^^ irrelevant number due to insolvancy. Only $1165 Bitstamp matters.



15. Post 17771459 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

LOL, according to this notion eth all time high is $2000 and Zec's is $200000 because some "opportunists" traded a few tiny fractions of a unit at day one when there was like 0.03 zecs mined.



16. Post 17791365 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: ImI on February 09, 2017, 02:37:41 PM
Still the effect of real news is not bigger than the January fall to $800 and lower that happened for no concrete reason, at least until now

I guess the chinese are getting less power in the price, what their next move will be?

Next step would obv be to close a small exchange. Then, after several smaller ones, proceed with the bigger ones.

Then go after the miners. Then go after every retailer that accepts BTC.

oh, please, just cut it. If they wanted this, they would have done it long time ago.
high price as a threat? To what exactly? Sometimes communists have such idiotic notions.



17. Post 17791523 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Torque on February 09, 2017, 02:54:55 PM
I'm actually not enjoying this price drop. It's beginning to hurt my eyes seeing these numbers.

Today started so well and looked so bullish. It just shows btc hasn't grown up fully and can be battered at any moment. This will not help ETF

Actually it absolutely WILL help the ETF.  I believe this is being done in support of the ETF being approved.  


They've had years to implement this. So what other reason would there be to rush KYC/AML implementation and have it done exactly 4 weeks from today?

I seconded it on the other thread.
Bitcoin's Manifest destiny, man.



18. Post 17791886 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: ImI on February 09, 2017, 03:24:13 PM
losing the mining is alarming, i dunno how things would pan out if they did or even whether it's possible
The only possible ways to do that is to prevent the farms to communicate on internet (impossible), or to physically delete the farms, ie put people in jail and/or burn the miners (not likely but possible for big farms because of the electric bill)

there are lots of people making money because of the existence of mining farms in China. from the owners of the farm and their employees to small electric companies who owe their survival to mining farms and their special contracts, and the hardware companies manufacturing mining equipment.

don't think for a second government can even touch such a huge financial operation with so many big people involved.

miningfarms will most likely not be shut down, but instead they could very well be forced to mine the official chinese cryptocurrency that the chinese gov has already announced. that would be a much more possible scenario imo.

official cryptocurrency will NEVER happen because it is an idiotic concept to begin with.
why would any government want to issue a currency that is limited in size (number of units)?
if it is not limited in size, then why bother in the first place? they can "digitally" print as many yuans as they want.



19. Post 17792552 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Lauda on February 09, 2017, 04:05:47 PM
It's only midnight there and they were awake 3h ago when this happened
Why would they sell more, and why would they sell at all?
Why would you go to a store to buy goods which you can't take out of the store? Makes perfect sense.

Well, maybe the whole point is to make Chinese volume less frenetic.
less volume, less influence.
their volume will probably go from 40% to 10-20% shortly
It is better for us in the west.
Thanks, China!



20. Post 17793021 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: becoin on February 09, 2017, 04:47:42 PM


Here is what have happened.

During first meeting, one month ago, Chinese bitcoin exchanges were forced by PBoC directly or indirectly to sell part of customer bitcoins to suppress price. Of course, they were assured that the bank will financially compensate them if price moves in the opposite direction. Surprise, surprise, but not really. Price moved in the opposite direction! PBoC took huge loss and worst of all the exchanges now don't have enough bitcoin liquidity to meet customer withdrawals. So, the only logical step forward is to block bitcoin withdrawals under pretext that it was ordered by the bank for AML issues. If bitcoin price stays  above $800 Chinese bitcoin exchanges are toast. PBoC will never truly compensate them.


an interesting theory...
bobby lee implies that recent meeting was held because "the price is too high'
the guy is quite brilliant, i think.
the solution is to default trading unit to a mtbc (1/1000 Btc), which psychologically solves the too high price perceived problem.
I would like this to be implemented.
incidentally, similar solution was just proposed by ETF, where they changed from 1/10 of bitcoin to 1/100 of bitcoin unit.
Nobody wants to spend $1000 and get just 10 shares, 100 shares is better psychologically, albeit it is exactly the same in value.
this way "whales" will buy full BTCs on Gemini, etc and "commoners" will buy ETFs for 1/100 of the price and feel satisfied.
perhaps, china will move to two-tier trading as well with one exchange (which one?) doing it for high value and the rest (BTCC, etc) would be in non-threatening mbtcs.



21. Post 17875573 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

How about this scenario:

chinese bitcoiners are waiting for up to 1 mo to transfer bitcoins out and presumably convert to $$ or euros on western exchanges.
In the mean time ETF is approved, which coincides with chinese coin release.
Therefore, chinese dump their bitcoins into the ETF-caused surge, thereby negating the magnidude of the surge greatly or even completely.
I would love this scenario as it would allow me to buy ETF on the cheap in my IRAs.



22. Post 18028211 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on March 01, 2017, 06:31:36 PM
BTW the right hand character is a 2).

   

Oh, yeah, says who?  Grin
Check this out:
http://easydecals.com/products/cursive-dnealian-alphabet-numbers-wall-decal#

Note the 7 with a bar as well, LOL




23. Post 18038706 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 02, 2017, 03:17:53 PM
A fine early good morning Bitcoinland.

Seems we've already accomplished several things on our to-do list.

ATH, check.

Gox finally laid to rest, check.

Gold ounce parity, check.

$20B market cap, check.


All is well in Bitcoinland... currently $1224USD at Bitcoinaverage.

Let's not stop here. Go Bitcoin go.

Well, it is all good, but 20bil is not a large sum on wall street these days.
A company that helps you make pictures that disappear after a while will be worth at least this much today.
A side note...coinbase seems to enjoy trading and making money with my deposit money that did not show up in my account after almost a week.
Maybe, I should switch away.



24. Post 18038745 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: gentlemand on March 02, 2017, 04:03:54 PM
So what price would it have to return to make people feel sad? $900? $800? $700?

This action won't last forever. The question is whether it's just beginning to rev up or run out of steam.

900 -meh
700 -sad
500-600 -dejected



25. Post 18039432 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Bitcoin's market cap (current) is about $20.2 bil
SNAP (today's IPO) $35.3 bil

We shall see what happens in 4-5 years.



26. Post 18042355 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on March 02, 2017, 07:44:10 PM
None of my friends have mentioned bitcoin to me recently.

Now...these are the friends I was boring back in 2013/14 about it and when the shit hit the fan and it dropped to $200 I bought them all up. My friends know this.

This has all happened and not one of my mates has asked or text me about bitcoin.

Is this because:-

A. They all know the price now and don't want to talk about it as they feel sick knowing they laughed and made jokes.

B. They haven't even heard the news as the media have hardly reported on it.

C. They hate me and never liked me in the first place bitcoin or no bitcoin.

I always tell my friends that i will not give them buy/sell advice and I never do.
However, I did notice the same thing-nobody talked about it with me since last summer ($400).
I'll go with B, though. Maybe a little of A for some.
Ask a random guy on the street-they wouldn't now.
Older folks are into paypal, younger-venmo.



27. Post 18042892 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Punisher1314 on March 02, 2017, 10:34:40 PM
Possible floor at @1939$ on stamp, let's check it again after some hours. That was the Gold price this morning (1934$ right now), so it can be a good signal that the markets approve that btc > gold, but let's see if it is in the short term or in the long one.

Btw what are now saying those gold-supporter twitter accounts bearing about btc?  Grin Grin Grin

$1939? Back from the Future part unknown?
maybe some other $$, not USD  Grin



28. Post 18114139 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: yefi on March 08, 2017, 06:19:19 PM

Those guys actually get paid to lose bitcoins.  Sounds like a cushy job, how do I join their management?

to be fair, they only underperformed last mo if you look at the chart. They also have slightly lower volatility than btc proper.
however, a majority of "active" managers underperform the index, which is already known.
i think that the appeal of this fund is bitcoin volatility exposure (in fiat) without a need to secure bitcoin (on investors part).



29. Post 18114541 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: toknormal on March 08, 2017, 06:54:51 PM

Isn't the ETF decision happening today ?



http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-07/sec-said-decide-bitcoin-etf-friday


Not disagreeing, but where SEC gets these type of rules?
I already listed several ETFs that literally rob the investors, but they were happily approved on time and on TOP.
Here are some: USO, SDS, RWM, UNG
SDS, LOL, 260 to 13 in six years (95% decline), most of which is slippage.
i did not invest in any of this stuff, thankfully.

Now, if there will EVER be a futures based bitcoin ETF, i would happily short it.



30. Post 18139799 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 10, 2017, 08:27:10 PM
Sheesh, I go for a snooze expecting a decision to be made by now, and they still haven't said bupkis?  Angry


Eric Balchunas, a senior ETF analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, who affirmed that he has heard chatter that the SEC will announce its decision between 5pm ET and 6pm ET.

Phil Bak, a former New York Stock Exchange managing director and current CEO of ETF issuer ACSI Funds, said he thinks the SEC will wait until US markets close to reveal its decision.

"Usually they come in during the morning, but in this case we can probably expect it after the close … I would expect it between 4:00 and 6:00 or so," he said in an email.

http://www.coindesk.com/winklevoss-bitcoin-etf-decision-may-come-us-stock-market-close/

You are right, of course, but it is such crock of ...
Why exactly it has to be after closing? A rhetorical question, of course.
There is exactly ONE security (GBTC) that is tied to this right now.



31. Post 18140174 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

In the long run, who cares.
I kind of agree that ETF was premature, maybe.
All accompanying verbiage is rubbish, of course.



32. Post 18140228 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: lightfoot on March 10, 2017, 09:15:58 PM
In the long run, who cares.
I kind of agree that ETF was premature, maybe.
All accompanying verbiage is rubbish, of course.
Points out the SEC will only list things they can control. They can't control bitcoin. That's the whole fucking point. :-)

...and we shouldn't care much about ETFs from now on, just develop this into it's potential, slowly, but surely.



33. Post 18141359 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

winklevosses: can you regulate our security?
SEC: we cannot regulate it because it is currently unregulated

Let's construct something ad infinitum ( A play on regulation  Grin):

A regulator regulates all those, and only those, who do not regulate themselves.
The question is, does the regulator regulate himself?



34. Post 18141376 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ducknaldo on March 10, 2017, 11:04:03 PM
Kraken stop losses not working.
Wiped out my entire account (5000 euros)

This is not the first time either.

I΄m done with kraken for sure.

I notified them that I want full compensation or I will report them to the police.

good luck with that....it's just too bad, but i feel that people were overextended.
It happened to me before in regular markets, but i don't play with margin anymore.



35. Post 18141394 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on March 10, 2017, 11:11:08 PM
The FED's going to raise the rate on Wednesday. That should compensate for the ETF rejection and stabilise Bitcoin's price.

why would it?
...I fail to see the connection.



36. Post 18141483 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 10, 2017, 11:19:26 PM
Just got home with 2 fresh paper wallets with a whole coin in each.

Missed the absolute bottom because it happened so fast but I still got in under $1050USD.

It didn't go as low as I anticipated in case of ETF rejection but it was definitely a buyable dip.

Hopefully I'll have some more fiat by Sunday in case it goes lower.

In the meantime, 2 more coins is 2 more coins. Fill that bag.

The moon can wait for today. There's lots of time for that.

...too soon, but OK for long term.



37. Post 18177450 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: r0ach on March 14, 2017, 01:36:47 AM
contentious Miner Activated Hard Fork - MAHF

less than palatable User Activated Soft Fork- UASF is less dangerous

I'm honestly tired of reading this Orwellian nonsense...

Why do you think I like metals?  Bitcoin is a Ponzi scheme created by *some guy.  Gold and silver are a Ponzi scheme created by *God.

^^^a bout of tautology, perhaps...
by your logic, *some guy surely was created (indirectly) by the same entity that created gold and silver, was he not?
who made stars, included supernova?
It goes like this:
? entity>early stars without much metals>supernova>metals>stars with planets that have metals



38. Post 18215779 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: gentlemand on March 16, 2017, 08:16:45 PM
but nonetheless very annoyed because of the bad actors in this community.

I for one am pretty amazed there aren't more of them. Bitcoin is a very fertile petri dish for every conceivable type of disgusting behaviour.

totally agree...high % of win/loss attract players who don't mind playing games.



39. Post 18226393 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: york780 on March 17, 2017, 04:46:52 PM
This 1 is 100% correct. ABC move thats what going on : https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/ST356mvt-03062334-BITCOIN-BE-PREPARED/

Thank me later  Smiley

Safe your fiat and buy more in the dip !

possible, but so it hundreds of other moves.
a broken clock is right twice a day and TA does not work reliably.

Quote from: york780 on March 17, 2017, 05:24:30 PM
I also dont expect that. But a final C downmove fits in the patern to 900EUR. His pattern is 100% accurate. I just wanted it to share with you guys, knowledge is everything!

you cannot say that his pattern is accurate when it did not happen yet.
let's wait and see if it was accurate or not.

My prediction
is IF we split into two branches (BTC and BTU), then the totality of these two will wither down to $550-700.
Once a winning branch is identified by the market, the winning part (BTC most likely) will go to $3000-4000 within 6-12 mo.

I also suggest that current turmoil is aimed at rearranging bitcoin ownership. There too many coins in "early" hands. Market turmoil will tend to mix it up. Many early birds will probably sell and new hands will pick them up and become new strong holders.



40. Post 18226543 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: infofront on March 17, 2017, 05:44:46 PM
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-exchanges-unveil-emergency-hard-fork-contingency-plan/

Quote
According to the statement – backed by Bitfinex, Bitstamp, BTCC, Bitso, Bitsquare, Bitonic, Bitbank, Coinfloor, Coincheck, itBit, QuadrigaCX, Bitt, Bittrex, Kraken, Ripio, ShapeShift, The Rock Trading and Zaif – the exchanges would list the BU asset under the BTU or XBU tickers in the event of a network split, which they collectively say "may be inevitable".


That's some really great news!
The big exchanges would list BU as an alternative asset in terms of a network split!
So even with less hashrate BTC keeps being BTC.Awesome!


I'm a bit technically ignorant about this. Would the BTC need to be sitting on an exchange at the time of fork? I'm just wondering because I have some sitting in a multibit wallet.

they requested code to clearly separate chains to make replay attacks impossible.
Replay attacks were a major nuisance in ETH/ETC split.
If you do nothing during a putative split, then, when you transfer to exchange, an exchange with proper coding should split your old coins and give you coins on both branches. Of course, some exchanges might not do it or do it late. Polo split eth/etc early, but Coinbase procrastinated.



41. Post 18226569 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: infofront on March 17, 2017, 05:51:01 PM
Personally i dont think that we will see a BU coin. Thats a kamikaze mission for BU and also the miners who have higher costs than profit. Also i dont see 3k or 4k soon. Lots of newbies got scared of this fork treat. Also when Segwit it activated i expect a next bull run with the same speed as this 1, so at the end of the year 1500$ seems within reach IF we fix this scaling issue fast! Lots of people got rekt when Bitcoin really forks, traders like me, hodlers, miners and the bitcoin currency itself. Bitcoin will give a big marketcap away when it forks to Monero and Ehtereum, Dash etc. We cant allow that!



I see the BU threat as a heavy weight holding BTC down, compressing it like a spring. If we can get BU out of the picture - watch out.

exactly



42. Post 18228177 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: bitserve on March 17, 2017, 08:15:01 PM
I am a bit surprised that noone has mentioned one of the consecuences a split between CORE and BU would have, apart from the AMAZINGLY HUGE volatility lower combined price etc...

1) If Bitcoin is split in two, core side will be at 1MB max block size at that time, and BU with an undetermined but bigger max block size.

2) Both "parties" will start dumping each other strongly. Chaos will reign and volatility could be so huge as to wipe ENTIRE order books up and down. (mainly down, even to 0).

3) All leveraged positions will be wiped on the peaks and valleys.

4) The difficulty will be much higher than the hashrate which, by itself, will create big delays between blocks. It is uncertain how big though.

And this is what I haven't seen anyone mention:

5) There will be a huge spike in transactions with people sending his coins to the exchanges. And I mean an unprecedently HUGE number of transactions. Orders of magnitude higher than anything we have ever seen.

6) Core with its 1MB max block and difficulty over hashrate combined will take ages to move the coins (which is not that bad because there will be less BTC coins arriving at the exchanges to be dumped), BU blocksize...well, I am not sure what it will do in that scenario, but it is possible that it will lead to additional hard forks/blocksize adjustment. Also Orphan blocks will be everywhere.

7) Even if in that scenario it seems that BU would be at an advange with its increased TPS over BTC, that will lead to more BUcoins arriving at the exchanges and being dumped by BTC supporters. The price of BUcoin will be much lower than BTC, at least for some time (days, weeks, months, maybe forever).

I could go on... but the only reasonable conclusion is that all this chaos and confussion will benefit noone (maybe to exchanges in the short period, due to the extreme volatility and huge number of trades) and that all this nonsense must come to and end now.



OR...you can chill out for a year or 18 mo and wait until the dust settles while mining alts.
In btc mining the biggest question would be WHERE as different pools would probably setup differently.



43. Post 18230826 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: MinermanNC on March 18, 2017, 01:33:59 AM
I'm not selling any BTC till we see 1200 again.

And I'm sure we will soon. There's a lot of hoopla going on for nothing lol

thanks...putting a sell order in at $1199.99  Grin

Quote from: chopstick on March 18, 2017, 01:32:02 AM
def going under 1k. At some point. Possibly soon.

Eth likely to hit $100+ this year.

no, it will not go above 30% in market cap (90% probability in my opinion) OR flip all the way (10%).



44. Post 18240890 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: B1tUnl0ck3r on March 18, 2017, 07:31:28 PM

I knew that, but I didn't realized it was that long to verify the txs. thx again for your inputs. And why not simply a 10mb block? it wouldn't be that big a difference from now...

10mb would be more than ample for the current state of Bitcoin. That would be capable of verifying about 30 to 40 transactions per second. Maybe less since more empty blocks would still end up being mined. However, if Bitcoin wants to compete with the big boys and feasibly be used to buy a cup of coffee; gets the mass adoption us HODLs crave; then we need to find a way to verify thousands of transactions a second. I only see an off chain solution to get us to that step.

it would be a first step... and then in a few years 100mb... 10mb would add a lot of capacity now without much change (a 0 more).

that's basically a K12 opinion.
what you suggest is a 14.4 modem followed by a28.8K modem followed by a 56K modem
what i want is cable or fiberoptic speeds aka new technology. Setting limit at 1,2, 8 or whatever is bumpkins.
personally, i don't give if it is set at 1,2 or 8, i just want next step to be something more inventive than linear mb addition.

BU=K12 level
Segwit=new technology basis

Case closed



45. Post 18241002 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: LLec on March 18, 2017, 08:01:30 PM
I told you i dumped my coins. They were mine. But now i m pumping ZEC.
What is ZEC? Grin

I keep hearing this word but it does not compute into my equations I have made of my computation into btc. Undecided

Queue the meme of the darleks! Wink
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/c5/43/26/c543261bfa10772a4fef1b04901019f9.jpg[/img]

it's daleks, NOT darleks, LOL



46. Post 18266724 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on March 20, 2017, 04:13:18 PM

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60gem4/jihan_wus_latest_weibo_post_looks_like_an_offer/

Jihan willing to talk is a GREAT sign! I really believe once he folds the scaling debate will start coming to a conclusion. The fact that he admits that he finds 2nd layer solutions a threat is telling, but he will realize that he cannot force the rest of the community to hold back on achievements to benefit the miners. A prosperous $2K+ bitcoin is much better for him than half a bitcoin with less users

a workable compromise being reached would be a monumental achievement.
and price would need to reflect that.

givin up control of blocksize, and in turn getting SF-Segwit, would be the best thing that ever happened to bitcoin.

As I read his comments, he doesn't care at all about blocksize - he just wants to block segwit specifically, because he wants to block 2nd-layer solutions that might  theoretically reduce his ability to maximize transaction fees.

Even if he manages to block segwit, those 2nd layer solutions are still going to happen.  LN and other 2nd layer solutions do not actually require segwit.

exactly.
a "buggy whip" producer who is trying to stave off an automobile.
well, the likes of him succeeded in England (at first), but not anywhere else.
the "water" will flow around him.



47. Post 18306110 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: promomei on March 23, 2017, 04:36:44 PM

nice article  Smiley  ty
Did you heard that Roger Ver  «Loaded»  will Change his BTC for BTU Huh  he got like 130k


you got it exactly backwards:
"Loaded" challenged Roger ("MemoryDealers") to give him, "Loaded", Roger's BTC in exchange for Loaded's BTU (if it ever come to pass).
So, "Loaded" thinks BTC/core will prevail.
Roger thinks that BU/BTU will prevail.

My comments and prediction:
Loaded is a VERY serious money, possibly a VC (who knows, maybe it is Tim Draper).
Roger will chicken out of the deal, most definitely.
If old money want to completely crush him, they will do so.
https://youtu.be/lKelkOC7cmo?t=59



48. Post 18309276 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: york780 on March 23, 2017, 09:34:02 PM
LOL. That ethereum pump&dump. I switched all my btc for ethereum just before the pump. And i just dumped everything for btc again. Feels good to be a trader. A nice 0,5 btc profit for today. Not bad. Please dont crash the bitcoin price while i am a sleep. Thanks  Cheesy

not really...most trades are bad, so if you trade a lot, you are bound to lose money.
in a bull market you might survive and even have some gains, but bear will finish the job, most likely.
how wall street calls daytraders gains: a loan.



49. Post 18309608 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: york780 on March 23, 2017, 10:18:16 PM
I am trading for over a year now, and i cant complain about the profits that i made. But yes you are right, sometimes i am wrong. Biggest mistake is that i sold all my eth at 11 dollar lol. This is just a little revenge. But to many wrongs and you are out for ever.

one year is nothing...tell me about it in five-seven.
The best idea (from experience) is to take profits into something more tangible and/or memorable: a car, a vacation, condo/house down-payment, payment toward a school loan, etc.



50. Post 18318104 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: yefi on March 24, 2017, 03:55:13 AM
not really...most trades are bad, so if you trade a lot, you are bound to lose money.
in a bull market you might survive and even have some gains, but bear will finish the job, most likely.
how wall street calls daytraders gains: a loan.

Not so, as not all trades or traders are equal. If you are inexperienced and lack the aptitude, expect to suffer losses, but do not discount those who are masterful at their craft.

There are always people similar to Stradivarius in their craft, but it would be fair to say that at least 95% of daytraders lose their money.
http://www.tradeciety.com/24-statistics-why-most-traders-lose-money/

Quote
..only about 1% of all day traders are able to predictably profit net of fees.



51. Post 18318177 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: becoin on March 24, 2017, 11:23:04 AM

The true reason for this range trading is end of March. Bitcoin businesses have to pay taxes. They are net sellers. Once March is over, uptrend will be reinstated with full power.

a fresh look at the 2013 chart makes this possibility less credible...

Quote from: Torque on March 24, 2017, 01:37:40 PM
This looks like 2012 all over again.

So to extrapolate then this year will be to 2018, what 2012 was to 2013.  Grin

...interesting comparison...so we are prone to correcting into a flat (at 750-900) until June or so, right?



52. Post 18444290 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

It is possible that BTC is making a second shoulder in head-and-shoulder formation and will bottom at around $750-850.
Then again, bull market may continue in a slow fashion.
I am curious about LTC, but it could be just a fluke.



53. Post 18474308 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: bitserve on April 06, 2017, 01:13:11 AM


Anyway, now that all cards are turned on the table we have a problem here. How to convince Jihan BU to lose that advantage in favor of Segwit.

convince him?
Cut him off, change the pow so something like this NEVER happens again.
If his machines stop working, so be it. I wouldn't mind losing all of mine providing that we have a path forward.
Besides, btc would be 2-3 times higher if not for that guy.



54. Post 18474458 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: gembitz on April 06, 2017, 02:37:37 AM


Anyway, now that all cards are turned on the table we have a problem here. How to convince Jihan BU to lose that advantage in favor of Segwit.

convince him?
Cut him off, change the pow so something like this NEVER happens again.
If his machines stop working, so be it. I wouldn't mind losing all of mine providing that we have a path forward.
Besides, btc would be 2-3 times higher if not for that guy.


^demonizing MINERS is just ignorant ~  we need them to process the transactions period , i don't see the problem ! ~ if they start go out of control "painting" coins or singling out transactions and censoring them we will just reset the blockchain ~ no worries! Wink *as per satoshis original ann

I AM a miner, am i demonizing myself? LOL
You seem to be not getting the full picture here.
He has been found cheating and allegedly breaking some patents at that.
In addition, he exposed himself opposing positive technology change for secret reasons that are not aligned with community interest.



55. Post 18474634 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Ibian on April 06, 2017, 02:58:55 AM


Anyway, now that all cards are turned on the table we have a problem here. How to convince Jihan BU to lose that advantage in favor of Segwit.

convince him?
Cut him off, change the pow so something like this NEVER happens again.
If his machines stop working, so be it. I wouldn't mind losing all of mine providing that we have a path forward.
Besides, btc would be 2-3 times higher if not for that guy.

So what you are saying, massive upside eventually. Sounds like an argument to buy.

yeah, sure.



56. Post 18475264 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: gembitz on April 06, 2017, 04:04:17 AM
lol looks like they found a more efficient way to mine blocks! ~ what stops anyone else from reverse engineering those chips? haha :-D obsolutely nothing! ..ohh what their patent? ya sure...bwaaa

you re still not getting it fully...
Allegedly, they sold miners (like S9) to Joe Public with a feature under discussion turned OFF, but they turned it ON for themselves.
At least this is one of the suppositions, and a proof of the pudding is in the fact that they produce abnormally high number of empty blocks, which is predicted to happen if they activate the feature.



57. Post 18483846 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Ibian on April 06, 2017, 05:50:09 PM
where else is going through what venezuela is?
All of europe and the states and australia and japan. China has its own problems. Venezuela is just ahead of the curve.

I am curious about Japan first. They had been on ZIRP or close to it for at least 2 decades.
A pop in interest rates might be very painful there.
Therefore, legalization of bitcoin and hundreds of thou or merchants accepting it by summer might be considered as building a possible safety net.



58. Post 18500144 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: gonzx on April 07, 2017, 09:38:21 PM
I wonder why btcchina and okcoin cny are low ( arround 7200 cny / 1050 usd ). If these markets dont go up I think other markets cant go up to 1300.

because PBOC. No free btc withdrawal there.



59. Post 18512548 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 08, 2017, 07:07:57 PM

Yep.. We would need nearly a 90x increase in prices to achieve that $10 million level of richness, but as I stated in my earlier post, I believe that $3million could be sufficiently enough (in the first world) to begin to live in a kind of "richness," and that would ONLY be a 25x increase from todays prices - still seems a bit of a stretch - but a bit more reachable than a 90x increase.


I agree that in US, for example, $3 mil is minimal.
1% in net worth is $8.4 mil currently.
1% in income is $343K/year

If bitcoin is at 500K by 2030 (as predicted by blockchain.info CEO), then 21 BTC would be enough (if inflation remains modest).
Numbers would change according to $ inflation and btc value, of course.

If each of US citizens (and nobody else just to simplify an example) would dedicate just 1% of their net worth to btc, they would need to buy 840 bil worth of it, which would be $50K/btc at the minimum (at the steady-state level).



60. Post 18575637 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on April 13, 2017, 06:12:46 AM

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/11/meet-the-millennials-making-big-money-riding-chinas-bitcoin-wave

Quote
Meet the millennials making big money riding China's bitcoin wave
[He] believes that in 10 years’ time, the value of the cryptocurrency will be “one bitcoin, one house in Beijing”. Minor shocks to the system, like the recent suspension of bitcoin withdrawals in China, are “just like breathing.”

I read that this morning. And they reported this guy doesn't even believe in bitcoin for long term...

Live from the sofa. A day in a bitcoin trader world
Good for a movie


Feels similar to daytraders in 1997-2000. Maybe before the start of a REAL bubble (like 1997-1998).
I wonder who here at btctalk is:
Brandon Gibson (Macbook air) probably a very connected whale
Huai Yang (looks at the large screen while chatting on btc talk on Macbook air?) clears $100K a mo, allegedly
Sun Zeyu (no macbook air) "Sun believes that in 10 years’ time, the value of the cryptocurrency will be “one bitcoin, one house in Beijing”

A Sign of a successfull btc trader=Macbook air...  Grin.



61. Post 18575691 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: SERVERIA on April 13, 2017, 06:57:55 AM
Oke i want to understand whats happening with the price can someone explain ?
Why nobody asks for an explanation while the price is going up?  Huh


because bitcoin is setup in a way that it's price HAS to go up (deflationary) since miners get less and less reward in number of btc in time (as long as difficulty increases every 12-14 days and it almost always does). Miners will not do validation if their costs exceeds reward, hence price has to go up.
It is not guranteed, but so far it has behaved as expected (over long time frames).



62. Post 18643426 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: gentlemand on April 18, 2017, 04:16:50 PM
Don't you think the fact that Finex's 4 Taiwanese banks have frozen transfers (under pressure from Wells Fargo) has something to do with it?

I find it rather odd that this question is still popping up. The reasons are on Bitfinex's site and it's obvious why it is how it is.

it's not this simple, perhaps.
BTW, bitfinex uses USD or USDT?
btc in USDT is also abnormally higher on polo than on GDAX or coinbase (which use USD, of course).
maybe it is also related to tether, which never liked anyway.



63. Post 18778016 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on April 27, 2017, 07:02:32 PM
Nah, it's a bubble.  I know I look like I'm running around spreading FUD everywhere, but I don't have enough money in Bitcoin to have a decent incentive to do that.  I just think that people would be much safer if they're either holding for the long term or selling soon so that they can buy back in at the inevitable drop to under $1200, whenever that happens.

if this is a bubble then i also happen to be satoshi.

a bubble makes you shake your head in amazement every morning when you check the price. if this was a bubble there'd be talk of taking out bank loans on here and people going crazy everywhere. read this thread in 2013.

none of that is happening. there's no euphoria, no media attention, nothing. only a high price.

well, in the last 5-6 mo bitcoin is up from $800-900 to $1300ies, def not a bubble.
eth in the same time is up from 6-7 to above 60; i would call it a bublette, maybe a real bubble would occur in the fall (eth 2017 is largely a repeat of bitcoin's 2013).
One thing is clear to me is that eth is not really an alt anymore with market cap above 6bil vs btc 22bil.
if btc is google, then eth is facebook at ipo.
both btc and eth should be successful.
icos drive eth up because they suck eth out of circulation (temporarily, of course).



64. Post 18934990 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

what's up with the price...too fast...are we about to go supra-exponential for a short time?
$3000-3500 in a mo, than sharp down to $1100?



65. Post 20847009 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.17h):

Quote from: BTCtrader71 on August 13, 2017, 06:01:34 PM
Don't underestimate the value of meeting chicks by playing. At my age if I hit on women 20 years my junior, I'd be a dirty old man. If they hit on me, I'm a cool old guy.

Some young chicks are totally into older guys.

Ever read The Game by Neil Strauss? That shit is real.


where are those?
some of them are just gold-diggers, I surmise.
or, maybe, they also consider older guys "safer"?
women's heart is an enigma.



66. Post 28287078 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.38h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 16, 2018, 09:34:01 PM
can someone please call the bottom

9 grand ish or 5 grand ish. I can't be bothered to choose.

mluc favors 9, some agreement there.
Me, I can never call highs or lows.
Last time i thought $350 would be the low, but it went to $175



67. Post 28357679 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Quote from: infofront on January 17, 2018, 08:10:57 PM
Masterluc:

Quote
Well, you understand. From 10k and lower - the last station of the departing train. Who did not have time - buy as last time in life.

More than 10k does not make sense from my point of view.

bad google translate.
ml says:
Бoльшe 10к нe имeeт cмыcлa зaxoдить c мoeй тoчки зpeния.

Better to translate like this:
From my [ml] point of view, it does not make sense to buy above 10K [here].

My interpretation: he was right as we dropped close to 9K ($9150 on polo) and when he was posting we were at about 11K.
We shall see if we will revisit 9K or even 8K relatively soon. the first phrase indicate to buy like a mofo somewhere here and his prior advice was 9K. Darn it, so far he was right on the money.



68. Post 28379787 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Quote from: TERA2 on January 18, 2018, 07:06:30 AM
All of the alts are merely acting like leveraged bitcoin right now. It doesnt matter what you think of that alt. If youre confident bitcoin is going to make a move than using the alt is a more profitable choice. XRP was especially appealing because it was down 75% from the high it had just 2 weeks ago. I figured if btc had a hard rebound then XRP could easily see a crazy spike as high as 200% transiently, though I ended up settling for 50% instead. At the very least you were definitely going to get your buy price back after any kind of bounce. Think of the 85 cent XRP. Where do you think it was going? Was it just going to go down to like 50 cents and stay there indefinitely without any bounces? It was just $3.30. 2 weeks! I understand the fundamental sentiment about ripple but this isnt a penny stock, it's a multi billion dollar digital currency.
This was funny.  At this junctions alts are exactly that.  Low liquidity penny stocks.
Not low luquidiity today. During high volume you can buy XRP and ETH from walls of up to $2 million in a single order. Penny stocks are lucky to see $100k of volume in an entire day. Have you ever traded a penny stock? It would be worse than trying to trade PPC, which has 15btc of volume today. It's a nightmare. If you buy at the wrong time you are instantly wiped out with no chance to sell even if the price hasn't moved and you know you need to sell.

GBTC is splitting 1:91, effectively resulting in about 1mbtc/share.
An interesting experiment.

penny stocks could be liquid.
One such example is SIRI that was a penny stock for years with 5 bil shares.
It's volumes pretty much stayed the same all the way from $0.1 (a decade or so ago) to the current price around $5.



69. Post 28425419 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 18, 2018, 07:03:31 PM
FWIW, I'm HODLing until at least next week. Still on track for end of Q1 retirement. Resolving some banking and exchange issues with making sure wire transfers are cleanly hitting the target account (... have I mentioned how silly the entire banking system is ?)

Still in the process of moving off the first large chunk of fiatcoin off the exchange, and don't want to load up any more until the USD balance reads $0. Over half-way there at this point.

Mentally "OK" with selling the next chunk @ $12.5k USD/BTC, but my gut tells me we're going to head above that by the time I'm ready to cash out again, sometime mid next week.

EDIT: a word

In the other news: "Bitcoin has been undergoing a slight dip as the notorious self described "gay cowboy" bitcointalk message board poster was selling to finance his presumably lavish "retirement" style."

 Grin



70. Post 28571145 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Quote from: infofront on January 20, 2018, 08:52:51 PM
Yeah I'll probably sit down and figure out certain percentages to sell at certain price levels to achieve certain goals. That seems to be the reasonable way to do it.

Bob's discipline in doing so has been inspiring.

Perhaps, but this course of action assumes long term stability in the currency you exchange to. Can we be so sure?
I feel totally fine selling small amounts of btc if I need cash soon (it rarely happens). I was planning to sell some moderate amounts at $21-23K (due to some technical considerations), but the price did not happen as of yet. If it takes a year to get there, i am not sure that I will have the same conviction (to sell).

At some point we would be able to easily exchange relatively stable cryptos for relatively stable currencies and/or goods. We are not there yet by a large margin.



71. Post 28726264 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.39h):

Regardless of the current momentum (down), here is an interesting link:
https://medium.com/@xoelop/weve-simulated-the-bitcoin-price-for-the-whole-2018-you-won-t-believe-the-result-4a602679dac2

Not sure re methodology, but it is kind of cool:
Most likely price: $55-58K/btc at the year end.
The probability of the price below $12951 (price when he made the plot) is just 9.84%.
An equal chance of the price below 13.2K and above 271K. Wow.
We are 20% below, so odds should be even better than 100-9.84%=91.16%, perhaps.
I like these odds  Grin



72. Post 28789171 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.40h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 24, 2018, 12:29:50 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg28701688#msg28701688

#justsayin'

yea, sorry, double post; this thread produces so many pages a day, missed it (your post).



73. Post 28938292 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.40h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 26, 2018, 02:02:55 AM

Naw, brother. It's not like that. Just introspective hell right now, with everything coming up, and my partner being out of town.

Still have some work I need to trudge through, and just can't find the motivation lately.

Know what I mean ? Winter blahs starting to get to me. Can't wait to move out of Montana end of March. Hate the snow.

Moving further South.

Looking forward to pursuing passion projects, that I really can't start on now, for... reasons.

My advice is not to go too far. It is a known fact that people who lived most of their lives up north sometimes don't last in the South.
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/keep-it-cool-hot-weather-advice-older-people

I am thinking to move in the opposite direction (from TX to CO or OR) in due course.



74. Post 29060152 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.40h):

Anybody has a link to approximate hardware requirements to run LN?
Do you actually need RAID and lots of memory or reasonable PC is enough?

Another question: they usually say that original channel you establish is between entity A and entity B (Alice and Bob in examples), but could it be your account #1 and your account #2. To me, this would be cleaner.



75. Post 29061341 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.40h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 27, 2018, 07:55:42 PM
Haven't decided between settling in the outskirts of Houston or Dallas, but looking towards Texas for their tax laws, cost of living, weather, lifestyle, and travel-hubs.

Driving 911's in the snow is just uncivilized.

I am in Houston for a while already. It improves steadily (apart from traffic), very green (some streets look awesome with large oaks), diverse and tolerant city (in general).
Lots of land and NO zoning laws, so RE prices are low(er) in suburbs comparing to other big cities.
Two things: summer temperatures are sometimes above 100F (with humidity) and RE tax (more than twice that of Montana) and there is nothing like CA prop 13. In Houston, they can increase your RE tax 10% a year (and they do) until you are 65, after that either flat or smaller increase, not sure. The good thing-you can appeal the RE tax, but have to have a good reason to win.

Overall, I think that in TX the best place to move in is probably Austin (which has some hills) vs flat as a pancake Houston.
Dallas has local tornadoes, Houston is sometimes affected by hurricanes (like every few years now).



76. Post 29074879 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.40h):

Quote from: Torque on January 28, 2018, 03:43:26 AM
$200 spread now between GDAX and Bitstamp & Bitfinex. Kraken and Gemini are finding middle-ground.

WTF Coinbase ?!

Y'know, it always feels like a fkn week or two can't go by until some other FUD with Bitcoin starts to brew. It's like we can't just have a normal market, they have to keep playing these fucking games all the fkn time.

I'm already bracing for it.

Could be a benign explanation.
Excited students talked to their folks to buy bitcoin during Thanksgiving and/or Christmas.
Mom and pop went to Coinbase and bought right around the top, then saw their holdings halved.
Then they did not sell at a first rebound around 16.5K.
Now that it rebound a little from recent bottom, they are rushing to sell, especially if they also lost on Ripple bought a week or two later.




77. Post 29269753 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.40h):

Quote from: mindrust on January 30, 2018, 08:02:20 PM
What if this whole thing since the last summer was a planned Gox v2.0? Bull running bitcoin to $20k and bear run it back to $1k after tether stuff blows up.

Never say never guys.  Cool

is it possible that a large asteroid hits earth? yeah
is it possible that on some island in atlantic a large rock will drop in the ocean, devastating US east coast? yeah
However, you can't trade based on these possibilities.

My take: reduced oscillation thesis

$32 peak, correction to $2 (94%). Bottom just 6.25% of the peak.
$1176 peak, correction to $175 (85%). Bottom just 15% of the peak.
$19760 peak, correction to? Linear progression of the trend suggests that ULTIMATE low would be $7113 if my reduced oscillations thesis is correct.

However, it is entirely possible that we will double peak like in 2013. In that case, the ultimate peak would be $50-132K, then a long bear with a bottom at 36% of the top give or take.
Therefore, if we go down to $7K relatively soon, then it would indicate that a bull market is about to start.
In an alternative scenario, we will bottom higher, then go to $50-132K for an ultimate bubble.



78. Post 29349437 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

I tried to restart the bull earlier today by making a small btc sell  Cheesy
It worked in March, and so far it is working today, lol



79. Post 29349680 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: Torque on February 01, 2018, 12:30:12 AM
PayPal ditched at EBay!  Shocked

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/31/ebay-in-split-from-paypal-will-start-using-adyen.html

I wonder if this will open the door for EBay to integrate other payment options like Bitcoin as well... hmm..?

Now it is becoming clear why paypal's CEO recently interviewed Wences Caseres on the "internets" where they talked almost 100% about bitcoin.



80. Post 29409058 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Here is my take:

1. I want to have more crypto in eventuality (longer term).
Lower prices would mean that I would need to spend less fiat to get it.

2. If someone thinks that $450bil of a new asset class is a "bubble" with more than 100tril slushing in stocks, etc, I would politely disagree.

3. who said that you have to sell for fiat? I am already using the correction to reshuffle the crypto portfolio to focus on those that in my opinion are more likely to persevere (bitcoin is one of those).

That said, my oscillation theory says that the ultimate low is at around $7113, but whether we get to it in the current downswing or much later remains to be seen. A dip to around here or $8K with a fast rebound is also possible. It thought that the latter is more likely, indeed, but we are driving down a bit too fast.



81. Post 29420532 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Not sure where we bottom, but PTB are surely playing with fire here, possibly.

In 2000, PTB started to opine about a "biotech bubble" (extreme bubble within the large nasdaq), which properly collapsed in Feb 2000, then all of Nasdaq followed in April, then ALL stocks followed in September.

One should be careful trying to puncture one "bubble", yet wanting to preserve the others (stock and bond market).



82. Post 29544407 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.41h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on February 03, 2018, 06:42:39 PM
Sheeit.
Hey Bob, before planning to pay some more millions $ to the IRS, you might want to check this article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/02/technology/cryptocurrency-puerto-rico.html

I appreciate it, but I'm the kind of fellow that likes to be way above-board with the IRS.

Zero aspiration to tempt the fates in that regard.



It wouldn't tempt anyone, it's the law, as long as you want to spend at least 183 days of the year there.
Not a bad idea for actually retired person, but would immediately affect only "new" capital gains taxes; for a benefit re the "old" capital gains, you need to be there for a while.
The "luck" will run out in 2035 (or 2036?).
EDIT: that said, some of these guys sound a bit nutty, with all due respect. Imagine what is going on there now :/.
Schadenfreude anyone?



83. Post 29618607 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

It is much easier for wall street to have a big score in stocks, bonds than in bitcoin.
if there was some money to be made by shorting, then 67% of maximum gains for shorts are already made.

From my perspective, bitcoin is an unencumbered asset (it has no debt or any other liability).
I simply consider it as a perpetual call option on the network. If you bought higher, then you are out of the money (currently), but since holding period is unlimited, what's the worry?

Just don't use cash that you would need in the foreseeable future to buy btc and you are, potentially, golden (at some point).



84. Post 29619690 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 05, 2018, 01:17:38 AM
So for the first time, tax planning needs to be taken into consideration in my trading strategy.  It makes things much more complicated but it is a nice problem to have.

How about this plan, consisting of two stages:

Stage 1: Accumulation (buy for fiat, buy through alt appreciation, mining, earning, etc.)
Stage 2: Distribution. Allocate a % you want to potentially spend vs how much you want to leave to descendants. Maybe 50:50 or 70:30, whatever. Then divide your stash (that you want to consume) into equal yearly buckets considering maximum life expectancy.
Enjoy life, travel, whatever. Maybe start the distribution phase at retirement of few years beforehand, say, 60. this way you would enjoy the potential spoils a bit longer or while in relatively better health situation.

Example: you have N btc, then 0.5N (or 0.7N) is what you want to spend.
If you start at 60, maximum lifespan is probably 30 years, give or take, therefore, starting at 61st birthday, and each year afterwards spend/cash out 0.017 of your stash (1.7%). This number would go to 3.4%/year if you don't want to leave 50% to descendants.



85. Post 29619795 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: tonyq on February 05, 2018, 01:37:31 AM
Use your heads guys.
The same people that bought at any price to send it through the roof are now dumping continually to get the price down to nothing.
I'll give you a clue who they are. They own all the world's banks and print money for fun.
They saw bitcoin as a threat....they are taking it out as you watch.

I call BS.

If they do it, then their precious stock and bond markets collapse, so they would end up losing (as a group) many fiat trillions.
Would they do it anyway? I have no idea, maybe they are stupid as a whole. They were in 2000, when they tried to prickle the biotech "bubble" and collapsed the techs, then Nasdaq and then the whole stock market.



86. Post 29620155 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Here is a theory.
Hedge funds are selling crypto because they feel a large correction is coming in stocks and they need cash to defend their stock positions, especially tomorrow.



87. Post 29668601 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on February 05, 2018, 05:27:32 PM

**Edited: CFTC has rescheduled the date for this event from Feb 6th to Feb 14th, 2017.**


Someone decided that they might need to deal with the plunging stock market instead and leave crypto alone?
One would hope, but whatever. It would be "funny" if they wanted to damage crypto and shot themselves in the foot so to speak.
It already happened before. A law of unintended consequences.

EDIT: Dow is down more than 500 points again.



88. Post 29670947 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: yefi on February 05, 2018, 06:11:53 PM
Assuming this mirrors the $2 -> $266 rally, $5000 will probably be a good stopping point.

I am getting more interested to know if the Dow is about to go down 20% or more.
Something is upsetting the markets as a whole.



89. Post 29671283 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on February 05, 2018, 06:18:56 PM
So is it official ? Masterluc is no longer sage ?

looks this way, for now, happens to every "sage" sooner or later.



90. Post 29674095 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: mindrust on February 05, 2018, 07:04:46 PM

I never did any all in/all outs since Mt.Gox. My strategy is dollar cost averaging. I buy some every month. Sometimes I buy from the top, sometimes I buy from the bottom.

Works fine for me.

I plan to buy some in April, whatever the price.
Accumulation will continue, just not now.
I think that overall wall street has gone complete nutso.
Maybe, they will correct a lot as well.



91. Post 29692253 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: rafanadal on February 06, 2018, 01:59:55 AM
Seriously, how can we keep hitting new lows again and agai ?
What are people thinking about ? Is everybody here trying to sell now to buy back at a later dip ?

Btc was never worth 5 digits to begin with
i don't even think it's worth 4 digits right now

The electrical cost to produce one bitcoin in US right now is about $3000 if you have around $0.1 Kw/h cost, WITHOUT equipment amortization. Maybe it can go lower, but I don't see why.
All I see is some games being played. Whatever.



92. Post 29693027 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: josephpogi on February 06, 2018, 03:54:58 AM
This message came from darkwebforum. Dont know but its possible:

From the 15th January’ 2018, there have been rumors from forums in the dark web about a possibility of a slump, down to $6000 by February 1st week before prices return to the original consolidation stage at $14K by March 2nd week.

On January 5th, when Bitcoin prices were at $17,000, at a dark web forum which can be accessed through any anonymous browser (like Tor), a forum member by the name Cyberjourno, says: “Guys, there are big players in play, big institutional players who want to bring the price down to $7000, I know it seems impossible now but these guys handle the media and know how to control the market. For the coming couple of months, guys, stay safe, don’t be scared. Brace for FUD FUD FUD!”

On Jan 5th there were two other comments on multiple forums in the Russian and South Korean social sites that suggested a bigger market manipulation in play. Interpreted and translated versions of the comments read: “Waiting for US, South Korea, Indian and Thai markets to break negative stories by February, prices to stoop back to $5000. Big market players waiting to invest millions in Bitcoin and smaller crypto counterparts. It’s easy to guess, find the common corporate entity that controls media houses in these countries. Make your connection”

yeah, making 60K from 20K is boring, but making 70-80% from 20K to 6K, THEN making 10X from there is cooler from their perspective.



93. Post 29693184 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: Peter R on February 06, 2018, 04:06:16 AM
Marcus is coming to terms with the fact that the Blockstream/Core narrative is collapsing.  He's realizing that Bitcoin cannot succeed as only a "store of value"TM or as muh "digital gold"TM on its own -- instead, it needs to be used.  He's invested a lot into attacking people like me who have been doing the scalability research to grow bitcoin into a world-wide electronic cash system.  He sees his narrative coming unglued and so he lashes out.  

Marcus: have you noticed that the engineers of Blockstream are leaving?  Check out the latest Coindesk articles.  

Bitcoin will succeed, and it will succeed as a global e-cash system that is as useful to people making $2 per day as it is to people making $2,000 per day.  The Blockstream/Core "settlement layer" will end with this crash.

LOL Your stuff is less than a thou now, will probably approximate zero at some point.
Your buddy jihan would have to charge infinite number of bch for his hardware he he.
Who cares about bch when you have the same block time.
Basically, nobody or close to it.



94. Post 29738927 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: Torque on February 06, 2018, 06:07:43 PM
I find Mike Novogratz to be a fairly reliable contrarian indicator.


Yeah, but only when he talks. He didn't talk when he first bought eth at $2.
Maybe it is because traders like to throw other traders off (to do the opposite of what they intend to do)?



95. Post 29739134 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: Imbatman on February 06, 2018, 06:15:18 PM

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the problem is that historically a Bitcoin downturn has never failed to fall below the 200 MA eventually at some point and stay there for a while.  Undecided

Wasn't it breached late last night?  200 MA appeared to be around $6,050 and we dropped to around $5,600

Not for a terribly long time, but it was breached


What are your numbers based on? Polo shows 6012 low on 24hr chart.
Besides, moving below for a short time on itself does not indicate bear.
See in that guy video of S&P500 and Brexit. It even closed below 200 SMA, then popped right back.
It only clear way afterwards, so both scenarios (a bull and a bear) are still possible.
For bull to have a chance, we would have to move above 100 EMA and fast.



96. Post 29741391 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: kurious on February 06, 2018, 06:49:44 PM

Polo doesn't trade USD /BTC, better reference an exchange that does, maybe? Polo is usually a little higher than (say) Bitstamp - which I personally prefer, and Finex arbs with Stamp, too, usually linking prices between them (roughly)

technically, yes, but if they are almost 100% correlated, no big difference.
coinbase indicates 6166 low.
tradingview shows btc below 6K for a few minutes, hardly relevant (so far)
personally, I don't like either bitstamp or bitfinex (especially), hence the difference in opinion on price.



97. Post 29747612 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: jbreher on February 06, 2018, 08:56:42 PM
Maybe i’m Kinda curious off Some in here are actually selling / panicselling while writing things about Going to the moon and stuff ??

I did my selling in Dec.

cheers!

don't be so smug, you might regret it in due course.



EDIT: marcus_of_augustus....wow, thanks.



98. Post 29753863 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: strawbs on February 06, 2018, 11:01:20 PM

I retired before I was 40 thanks to crypto.  Fear not, you won't regret it. Best. Decision. Ever.

What do you do instead?
Some work is healthy for you, keeps you on your toes; it doesn't have to be a 9-5 type job.



99. Post 29754182 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: Elwar on February 06, 2018, 11:22:36 PM
So, just sent an email to our CTO to set up a meeting/brief-chat, to let him know that I'm resigning.

Congrats.

I second the congratulations, just make sure that you clean up your desk beforehand.
They might not let you to go back to your office/workspace (if you are in IT, as I assume your are).



100. Post 29754321 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: strawbs on February 06, 2018, 11:52:41 PM

I retired before I was 40 thanks to crypto.  Fear not, you won't regret it. Best. Decision. Ever.

What do you do instead?
Some work is healthy for you, keeps you on your toes; it doesn't have to be a 9-5 type job.

I went back to school to study based on personal interests instead of studying something solely in order to get a job at the end.  And I'm learning music, writing, travelling and generally keeping myself busy, instead of being kept busy by an employer.

To me this sounds more like a hiatus/recharging batteries/changing life direction than a real long term retirement.
Prediction: you'll be back..sometime. Nothing wrong to work for yourself either as in owning a business.



101. Post 29767511 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on February 07, 2018, 06:47:39 AM
I think MasterLuc has lost his edge recently, and I don't believe we'll languish for a year at 10K.

I think we are still within various of his suggested scenarios. This isn’t hard science but educated guessing.
Isn't hard science just very educated guessing? (Spoilers)

are you kidding?
maybe if we are talking about economic "science" and economists.



102. Post 29887502 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.43h):

Unrelated (mostly), but Dow is down 1033 900 poins back to the same 24K it bounced from on Monday.
at closing.
Ahem.

Jim Cramer talks about complete morons that "blew up the market"
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/jim-cramer-blames-a-group-of-complete-morons-for-blowing-up-the-market-2018-02-08

I told ya, messing around with bitcoin bull did them no good.



103. Post 29948640 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.43h):

Remind me NOT to invest in btc futures based ETF (when they come).
This is what happened to regulated, approved ETN:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/market-experts-starting-see-parallels-financial-crisis-153200210.html

Quote
Reuters reported that the notes “were worth a combined $1.6 billion on Friday… But ended Tuesday at a more-than-92% discount to their closing value the prior day.”

Quote
Credit Suisse, which introduced the XIV fund in November 2010, announced on Tuesday that it would close the exchange traded fund (ETF) effective Feb. 21 and pay investors the cash value of their holdings, which could be close to nothing.

A sad story of XIV (what a name!).



104. Post 29948894 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.43h):

Quote from: becoin on February 09, 2018, 06:29:33 PM
I get the sinking suspicion Wall St controls the price now. I'm probably wrong, but I can't shake it.

I was suspicious too until yesterday. Today there is a clear decoupling between Dow and bitcoin.


They don't have time for a side play when their livelihood is at stake.



105. Post 29950927 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.43h):

Quote from: Torque on February 09, 2018, 07:02:45 PM
lol

you guys seen the DOW?

Yeah, pretty amusing.

I'm wondering how far down it has to go before the MSM and Wall Street actually start freaking out.

They will bring it up, at least today, IMHO.
Freak out point at 200 MA (2539 on SP500?)



106. Post 30048072 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.43h):

The whole crypto world is kind of laughable right now.
The most ridiculous point is ALL of them are going up and down roughly the same %.
This is idiotic from a rational point of view.
One day up 20%, next day, down 20%.
Explanation: more FUD on Monday?



107. Post 30091278 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.43h):

Quote from: toknormal on February 11, 2018, 09:30:20 AM

Roubini invoking Trolly McTrollface now for BTC FUD propaganda campaign.

Trolly McTrollface...man, you made me laugh.



108. Post 30211441 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.43h):

Quote from: babanana on February 13, 2018, 09:44:28 AM
It seems the "old ones" doesn't understand what bitcoin is or the whole cryptocurrency. The so called experts are also old and calling all fud against bitcoin. Yet almost all crypto enthusiasts are the younger generation, mid 30's and below. There is the barrier. The technological gap between old and young. Give it a few years when we "young" are the old, then we'll see it flourish.

Early 30's here.  Wink

It's not how long you were around, but rather if you have a curious mind.
I have seen 60-70 year old professors to be faster on the uptake of the new technology than a 25 year old.
I agree that it is, perhaps, less common.



109. Post 30223182 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.43h):

My first attempt of using trading view (don't have an account yet and tried for just 5 min).
Just a rough sketch of btc doing something similar to an 'AMZN' chart of the early internet era.
Mind that from 2001 lows AMZN is up about 300X, so my prediction is not bearish at all going forward with 350K-750K projected in the future IF it matches AMZN tit-for-tat. However, I expect bewildering lows beforehand, although not soon.




110. Post 30225305 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.43h):

Quote from: Wekkel on February 13, 2018, 05:59:08 PM
My first attempt of using trading view...

The problem I have with these projected ‘bewildering lows’ is that they are planted just around the halvening. I just do not see this happening in 2020. If it happens, it happens in 2018 or 2019. But somehow, a full blown crypto winter seems far away. So that leaves 2018 as the most probable candidate, should a $2,000 scenario materialise.

Actually, I put in lows in late 2019 to be fair, then almost a flat with an upward bias until or close to halvening, then a takeoff.
But this is just a sketch with lines that could be drawn differently.
I guess my main point is a zigzag in 2018, hard down in 2019, recovery in 2020, then off to the races (higher).
I would like to see your projection, though.



111. Post 30227450 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.44h):

re age and bitcoin, it could be down to a few numbers:
2013:
americans 62 and above have $209K in wealth on average
americans less than 40 have just $14K in wealth.
https://www.stlouisfed.org/~/media/files/pdfs/hfs/essays/hfs-essay-3-2015-age-birth-year-wealth.pdf

however, you may also notice that 30-40 year olds have 30-50% more income than 62 and above.
I conclude that oldies have money, but don't have much cash flow-a perfect situation for them to do both things: buy btc (since they have more cash), and also mine it (since they have poor cash flow).



112. Post 30287378 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.44h):

Quote from: d_eddie on February 14, 2018, 03:09:40 PM
Volume surging. Buckle up gents, I have reason to believe it will be a long, choo-choo weekend.

Could be this or could be some news coming (good or bad).
At some point I do expect some SEC, three letter etc "stuff".



113. Post 30313957 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.44h):

Quote from: Elwar on February 15, 2018, 01:22:33 AM
If bitcoin doesn't break $9500 this week we all fail. as humans

9600 on polo, humans are still OK  Grin



114. Post 30439214 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.44h):

Quote from: ChinkyEyes on February 16, 2018, 08:58:29 PM
That is a very good question, but we cannot just assume that it's because the whole population of the poor and mediocre are all depressed and suicidal deep inside. Even smart people seem to be more likely to be depressed and doubt one self. Because they tend to live more in their head and overthink things.

With the arrival of the information age I think we have produced way more smart people than ever before. The internet has become such a powerful tool to educate yourself, anybody with an cellphone has a tremendous amount of knowledge in their pocket. Too bad many people choose to not use it to it's fullest potential. So that could be one of the reasons why depression and suicide rates are climbing. I'm not sure I have not done research on this matter.


There were several polls where people tried to find a correlation between the income and happiness.
The population of US as a whole indicated that increases up to 75K/year would make them happier, but further increase would not (average US family income is about 50-53K).

Then, the second poll only dealt with millionaires ($8 mil average).
Millionaires indicated that they need 500% to 1000% increase in their wealth to feel happy.
High expectations!



115. Post 30440740 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.44h):

Quote from: romneymoney on February 16, 2018, 09:29:45 PM
...
Perhaps 2018 is bitcoin's 1994.
...By 1998 things had changed alot.  Win 95/98 IE/Netscape made it much more useful and simple to use the internet and sites began to proliferate.  I had dropped out to take a 35k job at a search engine optimization company (which seemed like alot at the time) that quickly went out of biz, but my connections from that job led to other connections that have kept me working for the 20 years since.

tldr; if it's 1994,  buckle up, things will be unrecognizable in 4 years.

What would be our Netscape moment? Or AOL temporary dominance?
Is Lightning a.k.a Netscape (without the IPO) and is Coinbase/Binance/Bitfinex, perhaps, the AOL equivalent?
Or, would it be something else out of left field?



116. Post 30440913 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.44h):

Quote from: mr angry on February 16, 2018, 09:45:45 PM

There were several polls where people tried to find a correlation between the income and happiness.
The population of US as a whole indicated that increases up to 75K/year would make them happier, but further increase would not (average US family income is about 50-53K).



Anyone earning ridiculous amounts of money will make people jealous. Coping with that jealousy would make most people miserable and depressed. Imagine parking your lambo then returning and finding someone jealous has scratched the paint work.

It does not seem to happen around here (south of US) as there are lots of good cars around (mostly beemers and jags, though).
Not many lambos.



117. Post 30448629 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.44h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on February 16, 2018, 10:27:23 PM
This snowball effect will continue until the Singularity.

Sometimes I think that bitcoin itself is a manifestation of the upcoming Singularity, still at the lower part of the exponent.



118. Post 30448841 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.44h):

Quote from: mymenace on February 16, 2018, 11:15:58 PM


yeah i like that

IP = Blockchain

replace the IP addresses with encrypted blockchain addresses

decentralize the ip layer - web 3.0 is here



isn't it somewhat similar to what Blockstack is trying to do, conceptually?



119. Post 30449018 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.44h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on February 17, 2018, 02:32:28 AM
2020... when I plan to buy Ireland.

Why Ireland?
New Zealand is popular, apparently, but you'll have to outbid P. Thiel there, lol.



120. Post 30494801 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.44h):

Quote from: Ibian on February 17, 2018, 04:27:24 PM
What we today call a job is, effectively, slavery. Yes people can choose what kind of work they do, but they can't decide if they want to do it - they have to work.

It's an interesting opinion, although i was lucky to always enjoy my work, even when working 10-12hr a day as a grad student and postdoc.

Maybe, I was lucky to work only on things that i liked and do only things that i liked (so far), it is probably not the typical work experience, though.



121. Post 30571857 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.44h):

A simple self-test for chimerism:

If you have eyes each of a different color, then you are most likely a chimera (not that anything is wrong with that).
Detailed genetic testing would be advised as to not have paternity/maternity issues in the future.



122. Post 30643220 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Bitcoin is up 4.5% today
GBTC is down 4.72% today, shrinking that premium (by 10% in one day).

Interesting.



123. Post 30784147 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: bitserve on February 21, 2018, 05:31:30 PM

Plus more than 95% of c02 comes from natural sources not human influence. "Climate change" is bullshit. It's just cyclical and perfectly normal variance.

I also see the argument regarding CO2 level as too simplistic.
Maybe there is no climate change.
However, one thing is difficult to argue with: human population affects on environment.
This is discussed less, because the remedies are unknowable.

Specifically, humans may be causing the sixths extinction event in planet's history.
For those who would argue that it is "natural"-no it isn't because it is happening too fast-within 100-150 years, not millions of years.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/19/humans-creating-sixth-great-extinction-of-animal-species-say-scientists

Quote
Under a “natural” rate of extinction, the study said that two species go extinct per 10,000 species per 100 years, rather than the one species that previous work has assumed.

Modern rates of extinction were eight to 100 times higher , the authors found. For example, 477 vertebrates have gone extinct since 1900, rather than the nine that would be expected at natural rates.

Unfortunately, the way it may develop would be either for us to go non-biological and, hence, have little imprint on life OR natural habitats would become so stressed that extremely effective life forms would arise and finish us off one way or another.

Examples: HIV, of course; brain eating amoeba (guess, who has the most brain/mass ratio?); green algae virus that makes you 'stupid'; mosquito spread virus (Zika) that makes babies being born with a smaller size brain

'stupid' virus:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/virus-that-makes-humans-more-stupid-discovered-9849920.html

Zika:
https://www.cdc.gov/zika/healtheffects/birth_defects.html



124. Post 30784575 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: Ibian on February 21, 2018, 07:28:05 PM
too simplistic.
The truth is always simple.

And the truth is that lefties are liars.

If you don't have anything factual, that can be communicated in three sentences or less, that can be checked by anyone with access to google within 30 seconds, it doesn't matter.

you get no argument from me re CO2 level. It might be irrelevant, and most likely is.
However, the rest of my post shows that we DID change this planet already.
This is not a political statement-it is a fact.



125. Post 30785571 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: flynn on February 21, 2018, 07:41:47 PM

I'll just drop this here (it's one among 1000's) =>

https://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2016/02/is_there_really_a_sixth_great_extinction_maybe_not.html

1. don't believe anything that call itself "real science", because it ain't.
2. The refutation is the quote from Sarah Kaplan that says that there were more species going extinct in prior events.

Duh! Prior events lasted for hundreds of thousands, even millions of years and
here we have 1% vertebrate extinction in 100 years.

1% in 100 years is a pretty big number IF it continues, but why won't it?



126. Post 30786437 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: flynn on February 21, 2018, 07:45:35 PM

And this is another way of seeing it :

It's the purpose of mankind to dig the earth to recover all the carbon that the plants hid down there. Without us, CO2 would go below 150ppm and all life would disappear from the surface of the EArth.
 

It's funny that I had similar thoughts when I was in my early twenties and was a bit more 'philosophical'.
My thinking was about the initial "purpose" of humans as a part of the biosphere.

I also thought about that, perhaps, at least initially we were there to warm it up, so to speak, because if we didn't and ice covered the whole earth, there would be almost no large scale vertebrates left (at least on the surface).
It goes without saying that low Co2 could have been at least one of the factors behind ice ages.

For those who thinks that earth land could not be fully covered by ice-apparently, it was before, in pre-Cambrian (snowball hypothesis).



127. Post 30798950 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: explorer on February 21, 2018, 08:02:36 PM

1. don't believe anything that call itself "real science", because it ain't.
2. The refutation is the quote from Sarah Kaplan that says that there were more species going extinct in prior events.

Duh! Prior event lasted for hundreds of thousands, even millions of years and
here we have 1% vertebrate extinction in 100 years.

1% in 100 years is a pretty big number IF it continues, but why won't it?


I think you need to balance that with discoveries.  It's like saying x people die every year, so the population will be zero in xy years.

https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/extrapolating.png

Which discoveries?
The example is not fitting since I was talking about multiple independent events and you are talking about one individual.

Here is an example of a proper extrapolation: if there are only A, C, G and T nucleotides present in DNA, than I only need to measure the % of one nucleotide (say, A) to find out the %% of all four. No need for further discoveries (in this example).

another one: if we grow turkeys for slaughter and ALL turkeys are grown for less than 3 years, what is the probability of a turkey, which is 1000 days old not to live beyond day 1096. About 100%.



128. Post 30799606 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on February 22, 2018, 01:57:26 AM

 If we divide the current value into the exchange glitch number we get

 ~1,904,761,904 Bitcoins?

 #Helluvaglitch!


I wonder what would have happened if he simply purchased close to his daily withdrawal max, then tried to withdraw.
The poor bastard might have pulled it off, lol



129. Post 30841774 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: flynn on February 22, 2018, 02:40:52 PM
Do we expect the bankers to allow a company called 'Robinhood' to exist for very long?

Don't worry, it's a false flag.

No, it's all just a cynical Orwellian ploy:

Robinhood- they will probably gut the retail eventually, one way or another.



130. Post 30846759 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: Lontonbit on February 22, 2018, 05:03:39 PM

Most of my btc will be passed down when I'm dead

what's the point? so your descendants indulge themselves with parties, etc.?
it is better to inherit income generating assets, which you can buy with bitcoin once it is at a relative steady state level (100k, 1mil or more).



131. Post 31060572 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):

Quote from: mindrust on February 25, 2018, 02:11:29 PM

IMHO the only thing that can justify PoW change is Quantum computing attack on SHA2, and Cuckoo Cycle is Quantum resistant btw. Doing it now is jumping in the abyss just for the sake of change.

Core devs can come out and say "We upgrading the btc protocol to keep it safe against Quantum computers so a PoW change is necessary".

Bitmain will have no ground against this.  Grin

man, this is brilliant.



132. Post 31062424 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on February 25, 2018, 07:30:51 PM
I can see 8000 where I will purchase another $100k Of BTC. What is your plans?

On top of buying drinks for the entire thread, I'll suck your dick if we see $8,000 USD/BTC this year.

You can quote me on that.

replying just to make sure I would have a reference.
Do I think that 8K is likely? Maybe not, but with a low conviction.



133. Post 31148390 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):

Quote from: bitserve on February 26, 2018, 11:43:03 PM
Honestly if Circle suddenly wants back into the crypto game by buying Poloniex, then they must think that they are going to make a killing in the future. And fyi Circle is partially owned by Goldman Sachs.

Something big is coming.

But... at only $400 million it is a steal. The only thing I can think that explains the deal it is that Poloniex owners have already made a killing and just want to exit with their asses fully covered (the contract will probably show that).

What I mean is that it is not like they had paid 10 billion (Instagram) or something like that which would clearly represent their willingness to have some REAL skin in the game.

I consider it "somewhat" bullish though... but not terribly bullish.

I agree, what is $400 mil when, according to rumors, they had $250 mil in revenue last quarter.
With lots of customer complains (although I liked their trading interface), they brought it as far as they could, possibly.
Now Circle will muck it up with stupid tries of "upsell".



134. Post 31148807 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):

Quote from: bitserve on February 27, 2018, 12:23:09 AM
Honestly if Circle suddenly wants back into the crypto game by buying Poloniex, then they must think that they are going to make a killing in the future. And fyi Circle is partially owned by Goldman Sachs.

Something big is coming.

But... at only $400 million it is a steal. The only thing I can think that explains the deal it is that Poloniex owners have already made a killing and just want to exit with their asses fully covered (the contract will probably show that).

What I mean is that it is not like they had paid 10 billion (Instagram) or something like that which would clearly represent their willingness to have some REAL skin in the game.

I consider it "somewhat" bullish though... but not terribly bullish.

I agree, what is $400 mil when, according to rumors, they had $250 mil revenue last quarter.
With lots of customer complains (although I liked their trading interface), they brought it as far as they could, possibly.
Now Circle will muck it up with stupid tries of "upsell".

Revenue is not profit but, a standard way to calculate the (fundamental) value of a business is the accumulated past and expected profit for the next 20 years (in traditional sectors). In high risk sectors like crypto that can be reduced to much less though, ie: 10 years.

Any way it is calculated, it seems that $400 million for Polo is a bargain... but we don't really know the details of the contract nor the real sell price. It's just all rumors.

thanks for the lecture :/
I am sure they have a hefty profit margin.



135. Post 31207989 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on February 27, 2018, 04:57:05 PM
Well we are queuing up for a run at 11k.  And we are in the window now where if we hit 11 we ring the trend bell as well...

Is the train coming??  




Wait for me [running toward the departing train]...I chose the 10K-11K bracket for the Feb 28 poll.
OK after that  Grin



136. Post 31208209 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):

Quote from: bitcoinPsycho on February 27, 2018, 06:03:58 PM
$11000 in 4 hours confirmed


https://i.imgur.com/6YXy1FB.png

so say my dog

An Alpine rescue dog?
 Wink
What a cutie...
I miss the snow...



137. Post 31355449 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 01, 2018, 05:30:13 PM
masterluc's almost 12 months sideways consolidation around 10500

That was not his chart, but he agreed with it.
We might go even higher in the first bumb, with even 17K-18K possible.



138. Post 31376722 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):

Quote from: d_eddie on March 02, 2018, 01:25:54 AM
No matter how rich or lucky I am, my lifetime is capped. No soft or hard fork can inflate my healthy living years to 1000.

It's important to make each minute count.

I agree with the second part, not necessarily with the first.

there was no crypto before Satoshi
there was no www before early nineties
there were no PCs just 43 years ago

Check out Altered Carbon (read the book before watching the show) or even more original Schild's Ladder (both published in 2002). Would you be able in, say, 40-50 years, transfer your mental state to a different substrate? A fascinating topic.



139. Post 31376906 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 02, 2018, 01:58:19 AM


Minding the gap?



140. Post 31525731 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.46h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 04, 2018, 12:18:43 AM
Trying to do tax planning. I have thousands of trades across a dozen exchanges in different countries in all sorts of alts.  I am really struggling to figure it out so good fucking luck to the tax authority.  It would take a CPA 3 months.   I’m just going to have to make a best efforts estimate.  Half the exchanges don’t even export trade records in .csv.  Plus miner fees and dust lost in web wallets etc.  Total mess.  

Just a general question: why would someone make thousands of trades per year?
IMHO, it is self defeating in eventuality.
Personally, when I over trade, it a signal that I am about to lose a lot of money (for me).
In happened in 2000-2001 just before I had losses in 2002.
One year i had about a thou trades. It took me about three weeks to figure it all out on Turbotax.
Some trades looked really stupid when I looked at the totality of it all.
After that-no more of that nonsense.



141. Post 31735970 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: bitserve on March 06, 2018, 08:50:23 PM
So we are sitting on an 11% swing and people are jumping off bridges?  Ok you guys are going to really lose your shit if we have a 20% swing.  Which is supposed to be a normal daily occurrence in Bitcoin  

That confirms my suspicion that we have not shaken all the weak hands yet. $20K can't happen before properly doing it so better now than later.

Actually, that was masterluc's thesis as well.
Btc has to spend a bit of time bobbing around 10k to get rid of weaker hands (at this level).



142. Post 31739603 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 06, 2018, 10:09:02 PM

img snipped

.... anyone wanna take the big ride?

Quote and pic from "Contact", one of my favorite sci-fi movies.
You meant that we are about to go to a galaxy far far away [as far as the price is concerned]...or you want us to come to Japan?
Japan seems to be doing great as far as bitcoin is concerned.



143. Post 31742839 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 06, 2018, 11:37:46 PM
i'm a vampire https://blog.coinbase.com/announcing-coinbase-index-fund-3925fbf548db

interesting...I guess this will compete with DCG funds (they recently announced four more).
However, GBTC is at advantage because you could have it in Roth IRA.
The downside is that it has a premium to NAV.
Only for accred US investors anyway.



144. Post 31754096 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: TERA2 on March 07, 2018, 05:55:27 AM
...The prices are outrageously high.

By what measure?
It is not like there is a P/E or anything like that.
Another three-fourfold increase in difficulty (and it is coming maybe in a few mo due to new rumored miners) and mining would be roughly at breakeven.



145. Post 31798716 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: TERA2 on March 07, 2018, 07:00:52 AM
...The prices are outrageously high.

By what measure?
It is not like there is a P/E or anything like that.
Another three-fourfold increase in difficulty (and it is coming maybe in a few mo due to new rumored miners) and mining would be roughly at breakeven.

By the measure that last time I looked prices were like $500

What does mining have to do with anything?

last time...don't be so modest. you post here many times a day.
bitcoin is not some lines on the screen, read about it.
example: if it would cost $100/barrel of oil to dig it out, do you think that oil would be trading at $100/barrel?



146. Post 31799119 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: jonoiv on March 07, 2018, 07:06:31 AM
...The prices are outrageously high.

By what measure?
It is not like there is a P/E or anything like that.
Another three-fourfold increase in difficulty (and it is coming maybe in a few mo due to new rumored miners) and mining would be roughly at breakeven.


miners mined at a loss for 3 years.  


which years?
never heard about it, most likely bs



147. Post 31800307 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

It does not matter.
It is either bitcoin/crypto for the world or we are finished (eventually) when the debt system cannot function any more.
2008 gave the world a chance. Satoshi took it.
If PTB would not embrace it (eventually) than we would have a complete and utter collapse at some point, but maybe decades from now.



148. Post 31801055 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: fragout on March 07, 2018, 06:42:39 PM
Article from trustnodes.com - https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/03/07/mt-gox-crashed-bitcoin-trustee-sold-bottom-blockchain-data-reveals


MT Gox’s bitcoin addresses are well known as blockchain detectives spent months analyzing them. One such address shows 2,000 bitcoin held by the trustee were moved on December 18th.

On that very day, bitcoin’s price stood at $19,000, briefly fell to $18,000, then continued to fall in subsequent days:

https://www.trustnodes.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/bitcoin-price-march-7-18-1.png


On December the 22nd, the trustee moved 6,000 bitcoin. That’s the big red daily candle above labeled 2, sending price from nearly $16,000 to a brief low of $10,800.

It appears he gave some time for the market to recover, then on the 17th of January at 3AM he sold 8,000 bitcoins. Crashing the market again.

He then sells another 6,000 on the 31st of January, but the vast majority was sold on the 5th of February, 18,000 in total. Sending the price to its recent bottom from which it then went on to recover and nearly double as the selling finally stopped.

This suggests the trustee has sold it all on exchanges, rather than Off The Counter (OTC), sending price down some 75% by perhaps placing market orders.

Apart from sell indicated as #2, the chart seems to be uncorrelated to his sells.
Overall, that guy is a moron trader.



149. Post 31819832 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: fragout on March 08, 2018, 12:31:31 AM
How does the coinbase index fund actually work? For instance if you invest say $10k, does coinbase purchase and hold the various cryptos on their books to match the $10k investment?

yes, it seems this way (at about 62:27:7:4 for btc:eth:bch:ltc ratio)
check am.coinbase.com
the weak point is rebalancing only once a year and withdrawing only once a quarter.



150. Post 31820846 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 08, 2018, 02:43:52 AM
How does the coinbase index fund actually work? For instance if you invest say $10k, does coinbase purchase and hold the various cryptos on their books to match the $10k investment?

yes, it seems this way (at about 62:27:7:4 for btc:eth:bch:ltc ratio)
check am.coinbase.com
the weak point is rebalancing only once a year and withdrawing only once a quarter.

That’s just silly when you can do it yourself.  Of course the real danger is BTC dominance goes to 80% and you keep shifting your portfolio balance into shitcoins.  

Yeah, but maybe makes some sense to a $$ rich institution of a home office which want to allocate some money into crypto.
Not the worst scenario. Could help to stabilize the gyrations a little bit, but will probably also decrease the range of the upside moves.

Quote from: slowlyslowly on March 08, 2018, 02:41:26 AM

where are the Winklevii up to with their fund? Still awaiting SEC approvals?

They are appealing a negative decision.
It actually sucks for them as they initially submitted the application in 2013.
I was certain that they would get it approved in 2014 or 2015, hence did not invest any $ in GBTC (in IRA).
Oh, well.
Personally, I think that they were treated unfairly.



151. Post 31885000 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 09, 2018, 12:11:16 AM
Something goxy is happening on Finex.
Lips sealed

stupid lawyer/manager breaks the best TA?



152. Post 31955920 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: infofront on March 10, 2018, 12:03:42 AM
BTC is better positioned to win a brutal war of attrition in which new resources coming in are limited.

Giant sequoias actually require periodic fires to get rid of the inhibiting underbrush and provide some minerals for growth.
They do bare scars though, but it does not prevent their growth.



153. Post 31965253 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

I am curious what would happen if someone would perform the same schtick with randos on the street (most likely nocoiners), but with bitcoin instead of gold. For gold see:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndshbH3qZ6Yhttp

my prediction: same result (no takers).



154. Post 32030955 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 11, 2018, 02:56:39 AM
I’m not going anywhere.   I’ve got another 5 years of hold in me. At least.  As I have said many times before, I will be accumulating sub $5k if we get there and very aggressively should we approach 2014 Gox ATH.  

The only way $1200 is possible if bitcoin would be on the way to it's death.
Buying in that situation would be a wrong move.



155. Post 32031635 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: bitserve on March 11, 2018, 04:15:32 AM
Just hodl, forget, and move onto other things indefinitely.

Yeah, I increased my stock market activity and decreased my btc trading activity from low to almost nonexistent.
The whole up-down thingie is bewildering to me and I cannot trade what I don't understand.



156. Post 32031906 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: Anon136 on March 11, 2018, 04:20:58 AM

Still not seeing a capitulation candle.

When was the US stock market capitulation candle during the 1929-1932 Depression?
The correct answer is NEVER.
Those who sold at the bottom of Black Tuesday in 1929 actually got a very decent price.



157. Post 32111596 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on March 12, 2018, 03:45:13 AM
You don't need to be a citizen, just have residence, ie a drivers licence.
I bought a gun when I stayed in Colorado in the 80s, and I'm a Swedish citizen.

Don't have to be a citizen, but have to be either a permanent resident (green card), have a hunting license valid in the residing state or be a foreign law enforcement rep of a friendly gov plus some unclear rules on visa waiver (maybe OK if you are from EU, Japan or Australia). Sweden qualifies with the waiver.
https://www.quora.com/Can-a-visitor-to-the-USA-purchase-a-gun-and-own-it-legally




158. Post 32179823 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: vanobe on March 13, 2018, 12:15:06 AM
Is it just me or is the mood in here turning very #CRAEFULGANG?

What does #CRAEFULGANG mean?

It' a parody on hey hey heyyyy...bitconnnneeee...ctttt dude.
Aired on J. Oliver's show yesterday.

https://youtu.be/g6iDZspbRMg?t=987

followed by (where craeful is explained)

https://youtu.be/g6iDZspbRMg?t=1361



159. Post 32183436 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: Torque on March 13, 2018, 01:37:12 AM

Ya'know, those smug douchebags can mock and parody Bitcoin and crypto all they want. I'm sure Jamie Dimon and the big bank establishment is loving that shit, as it keeps the Average Joes away longer because they mock it, like Bitcoin and the whole space is just one big scammy joke, a short term fad that only idiots would get involved in. Mind fuck on Average Joe, mission accomplished.

But we'll have the last laugh alright... oh yes...

Actually, the whole show was informative. I give it a B-
They only truly made fun of Bitconnect and B. Pierce, and rightfully so on both occasions because it is hilarious to hear what they were actually saying.
Nobody there made fun of btc/Satoshi, etc.
IMHO, the space should police itself better (in terms of pointing fingers and saying stuff, not in terms of censorship) so true scammers don't rise above the fold.

Quote from: jojo69 on March 13, 2018, 02:29:36 AM
for fuck's sake

now you have me actually seeing mammoths in the chart

There is plenty of bad mood around here because almost nobody sold at 19.6K and now they think that it is another 2014-2015.
I don't think that it is, but it gathers steam as a prevailing opinion in various places.



160. Post 32235480 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 13, 2018, 11:31:09 AM
oy are things going to get ugly https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-017-0001-5 A combined analysis of genetically correlated traits identifies 187 loci and a role for neurogenesis and myelination in intelligence

Why would they?
Interesting paper, though, thanks.
Incidentally, myelination was always going to be a factor since we know that in rare diseases where myelination is negatively affected (Tay-Sachs, Gaucher, Neimann-Pick) the result is always mental retardation.



161. Post 32250075 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 13, 2018, 06:34:21 PM
https://blogs.imf.org/2018/03/13/addressing-the-dark-side-of-the-crypto-world/

2018 is going to be another long slog...

Interesting...
An appropriate reply:
https://youtu.be/2RJH7GdvjP0?t=56



162. Post 32251012 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on March 13, 2018, 09:42:51 PM
All I hear is Tetris.
funny, although you probably did not see the movie.



163. Post 32334848 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: e-coinomist on March 15, 2018, 12:53:21 AM
Which low? The lowest BTC has been since I have been involved was about $170. I don't think you mean that low however; since setting a bid a 1000 below that would be impossible. Unless the exchanges make it possible to have people disposing of their BTC by paying someone to take them off their hands. Cheesy

170 left of a former 1300, or a -87% loss. Just any similar event of that magnitude is missing today. There was no Mt.Gox happening. Not even possible anymore since there are 114 tradesites doing above $1,000,000 *daily* volume.
Source https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/volume/24-hour/all/ beware some might hand out false data.

Tried projecting a similar decay onto $20,000 to get that "new 170 datapoint" since it looks again like $2600, that 2x ATH of 2013 mentioned bevore. Just a Gox order of magnitude event is still missing. Watching USDT peg closely.

Forecast of that kind are uncharted territory so best taken with a grain of salt.

I don't think that there is any magic formula like this, but if there is one, then I offer the following:

In 2013-2015 from Bitstamp's 1160 it was more like 85% decline, which was less than about 93.75% of the previous decline (from $32 to $2). If we, indeed, have reduced oscillations now, then bottom might be at 77% decline, which would be about $4544 and it will take a while, probably until the end of the year, maybe Nov (bottom like in 2011) or January (like early 2015 bottom)

It is also possible (although I am currently trending to reject this idea) that we are doing a double peak like in 2013 with current period being the equivalent of $260 (april) to $66-68 move back then (first down on april 16, double bottom on July 6). it was about 74% move if you count between $260 and average between two bottoms (about $67).
We already moved once from $19760 to $5984 (I am getting it from tradingview, others could be slightly different), which is 69.7%.
In this scenario we double dip in around $5800-6000 at around May 1, then surge.

TL;DR either a longer term bear market with possibly $4500-4600 bottom OR a double bottom at around 5600-5800, maybe sometime in May.



164. Post 32335346 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: jojo69 on March 15, 2018, 01:40:44 AM
Bob,   I'm ready for that drink. Single malt kinda guy. A shot of Dalmore is high on the bucket list or a older Balvenie might be just as nice. I'll do my best not to get any bitcoiner tears in it.
32D6TKWE5LEgNk6u92bEm1GNAzmnheXbCt

Sheeit  Embarrassed

Ok. PM me your meatspace address. Do you want to supply the blindfold, or should I ?

Hey!!!!!!!  


We are not all getting drinks?



People at the bottom:
Acid rain?



165. Post 32470964 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 16, 2018, 08:55:27 AM
Next time it goes superparabolic I want to be all in, not waiting to buy the dip.

Any sense what forks are worth if you have already sold your bcash lol and Bgold?

I am looking forward to a wallet which can give you a split of all forks, then convert them all to btc.
I don't mind to pay a fee for it (0.5%-1% of the total sum is probably reasonable).
Maybe there is already a tool like this, but i am unaware of it (has to be completely reliable).
I did one conversion, splitting btc, bch and btg. It was a bit long with the use of multiple apps.



166. Post 32471124 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 16, 2018, 07:27:59 PM
One Bcash wallet owned by Bitmain with a staggering 440,000 Bcash in it, that bag gets bigger everyday because nobody is buying that shitcoin. Tongue

It'd probably be a lot bigger if the largest Bitcoin holders (like the WinkleVii for example) would dump all their remaining BCash, but I imagine that some of them just can't be bothered to jump through the hoops.  Tongue

How do we know that Winklvii and some of the other BIG ones have not dumped their Bcash?

Well I guess we don't know that, it would take some sleuthing to know for sure. The WinkleVii claim to have not sold anything and have all their Bitcoin locked up.

But then with a BCash major dump the question is who would buy it? The BCash float is so tiny and thin right now that it couldn't take a major market dump. Not on the scale of what the Bitcoin market can absorb.

I have heard some of the Windlevii claims, and I just don't buy the parts about the locked up bitcoin.  I believe that they can honestly maintain their claim that they have not spent any of their bitcoin, but still move their bitcoin.  It seems that they did use some of their own bitcoin to collateralize petitions that they were making.

I do agree with your point that there are likely some BIG OG Bcash holders out there that currently could pretty much drive the Bcash market into a pretty low price status, if they were to chose to take such action.  It may be wishful thinking to hope for such, and perhaps we are merely going to witness ongoing Bcash bleeding.. and maybe some here and there attempts at pumps.  Unless we witness some pretty calamitous Bcash price dumping, I don't doubt that there are some businesses that might not be gullible enough to take bcash on as a "cheaper bitcoin," which could cause further pumps.

with bitcoin's volatility, it is difficult to borrow against it (in Winkelevi case); perhaps they used or will use futures.



167. Post 32474357 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 16, 2018, 08:10:01 PM
So we going to get one of those weekend pumps instead of dump?

Edit:  Genesis Capital has lent over $100 million in crypto to bears.

https://amp.businessinsider.com/a-bitcoin-trading-firm-just-opened-up-a-lending-business-and-its-going-gangbusters-2018-3?__twitter_impression=true

Genesis Capital in a few months trying to collect those btc back:

https://youtu.be/j4SRsGn14PI?t=1

Good luck collecting, lol
BTW, is there a way to short Genesis capital?



168. Post 32481835 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: yefi on March 16, 2018, 04:00:05 AM
This's interesting. We're no-where near the dotcom bubble yet in terms of market-cap:



I generally agree with this. The idea that it's the end of a great bubble conflicts with the capitalization of previous great bubbles. The South Sea Bubble went to $4tn in real terms and that was confined to a single country (albeit a world power then).

As Tera points out, we should include all crypto in the calculation, but at ~$850B the peak is still rather underwhelming as the finale of a global mania.

The quoted graph is somewhat strange as it suggests above $1 tril in internet stocks in 1995 or something close.
As far as I remember, Yahoo only started trading in 1996, although I could be wrong.
AMZN 1997, Ebay 1998. If they suggest that 1995 internet companies were Intel, MSFT and CSCO, than it is clearly a stretch.
Besides, I read somewhere else that "pure" Internet peaked at just 3 tril in 2000.

I agree with the overall conclusion that 850bil (at the peak) or 320-330 bil now, 18-20 years after the internet 'bubble", feels like an awfully small number.

Besides, MSM keeps talking about crypto bubble. They did no such thing during 1998-2000. Instead, it was always rah rah.
I remember some B2B companies that were nothing, but a reverse FUD from Mary Meeker, etc. They all pretty much zeroed.
VERT, lol, fun memories.



169. Post 32483465 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Yesterday: Lightning goes beta
Today: Visa head honcho opines on bitcoin below
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/16/visa-finance-chief-attacks-bitcoin-bubble.html

Lightning: would cost about 1c or even less for merchants to accept
Visa: costs 3% (at least) for merchants to accept

Hmmm, I wonder what may win out eventually



170. Post 32484127 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 17, 2018, 12:10:21 AM
Yesterday: Lightning goes beta
Today: Visa head honcho opines on bitcoin below
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/16/visa-finance-chief-attacks-bitcoin-bubble.html

Lightning: would cost about 1c or even less for merchants to accept
Visa: costs 3% (at least) for merchants to accept

Hmmm, I wonder what may win out eventually

Visa is not going to go down that easy and without a fight, so they are likely going to have to play dirty - and likely also be forced to lower their fees, too....  

highlighted...thereby becoming a great short, perhaps.



171. Post 32679999 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: jojo69 on March 19, 2018, 02:47:23 PM
wow

ether's done innit?

what are you talking about? flash crash on Kraken?



172. Post 32682314 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

maybe btc is different, but pumps like this are typical for bear markets.
bull usually does not involve 20-30% day gains (apart from blowoff tops).
we shall see.



173. Post 32718174 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

TL;DR if something (btc ups and downs) occurs 15 times faster than Nasdaq, than it is not the same type of phenomena.

People already posted the idea propagated by MSM that btc is like Nasdaq in 2000, but 15 times faster.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/19/bitcoin-is-unfolding-like-the-dotcom-crash--just-15-times-faster.html

Quote
The Nasdaq in 2000 and modern-day bitcoin both rallied 250 to 280 percent in their most "exuberant" periods ahead of bear markets, Morgan Stanley said in a note to clients.

"Just that the bitcoin rally was around 15 times the speed," Sheena Shah, strategist at Morgan Stanley said.

But here is a somewhat scary thought: if it is 15 times faster, than it is not the same.
15X passenger airplane speed is close to the rocket speed to reach the Earth's orbit.

To me, it is possible to think about this (superfast change) as winds on the approach to Singularity, whatever form it might take.



174. Post 32719062 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: bluebits on March 20, 2018, 02:43:40 AM
Without fresh money to pay off old holders the price cannot continue to rise.

That would have been a pyramid scheme, which bitcoin is absolutely not.

Bitcoin roughly follows Metcalf's law:
"The value of a .... network is proportional to the square of the number of connected users of the system (n2)."

Therefore, to increase in value 1000fold, you only need to increase the number of users about 31.6 fold.
I doubt that there are 30 mil active bitcoin users, but even if there are, 900mil out of 7bil is a possibility (eventually).
I think that someone projected $2-5mil btc with about 400mil active users.





175. Post 32871910 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on March 22, 2018, 02:02:14 AM
It went like this: 'I'm in love with the shape of your body'. If you can imagine that

nope...

"I am in love with the shape of you"
then
"I am in love with your body"

this makes slightly more sense.
most of us been there.
EDIT: I do agree with a "vapid' comment though, it's not "I want to know what love is" or 'Don't cry".



176. Post 32877320 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on March 22, 2018, 03:22:52 AM
I was in a taxi last night and caught the end of this song. It went like this: 'I'm in love with the shape of your body'. If you can imagine that




no social credits for you, young lady!
cannot take an airplane or taxi
please, walk this way...and keep walking



177. Post 32877414 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: TERA2 on March 22, 2018, 03:18:20 AM
With ETH about to go to $30, why would anyone want to buy it?

Is this where you sold it?
This number seems random.



178. Post 33478473 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 29, 2018, 08:48:23 PM
US tax day is 17 April.  I don’t think we can recover before then.  It’s what happens after 17 April that is important in my books.

I disagree.
Relevant: Local low in 2014 was on April 10. It bounced about 70% from the low before extending the decline. The 2018 equivalent would be to about $12410 from 7300. I am not predicting that it would happen right here.

Less relevant: local low in 2017 was on March 26, which we passed already.



179. Post 33478913 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

This thread collectively shows a lack of imagination, IMHO. Only "conventional" schemes were seen, always compared with prior bears, which i am guilty of as well.

Points:

1. We are currently in the bear market.
2. Each prior bear market so far was different (2011, 2013-2015), hence this one would be unique.

Here is a couple of scenarios (not too original):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg32334848#msg32334848

Looking forward to seeing something truly unique to consider.




180. Post 33479157 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: SidETH on March 29, 2018, 09:04:06 PM
I can still sleep, survived on noodles before. Luckily my belief in btc is alive, will just have to delay that 1M house for 6 months... Roll Eyes

@Dakustaking76: yeah thanks again for that reminder. Be so kind to send me a pm next time it hits $20k ok? I may have time to stop driving my imaginary lambo to my imaginary yacht by my imaginary 1M house then.

Someone ought to make a VR game "What if" where btc is 1M (or 5M) and you have an imaginary yacht and imaginary lambo or even 10mil house.
In the game you would havev to make all the right moves, though  Grin



181. Post 33486337 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

As I said before: by pushing crypto/btc down too much, Wall Street risks their precious long market positions at least in stocks.
I have never seen a "bubble" contracting in one area without precipitating an overall market decline.

What typically happens is that more frothy market declines first, but the rest follows relatively shortly.
I remember this from internet stocks and biotechs.



182. Post 33561497 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: zogrrr on March 30, 2018, 10:31:22 PM

BTC perfectly on course.

https://i.imgur.com/9nQrozK.png


the W Wink

yes, IF it happens, no guarantees.



183. Post 33563900 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

On bull and bear in btc...

There were too few bull/bear markets in btc, but assuming that average bull bear in btc is at least similar to stock markets, here is an interesting snippet:

One source indicates that stock bull averages 97mo while bear 18 mo, while another source states 31 mo bull and 10 mo bear, yet a third one says that average bull lasted 48mo and bear 14 mo.
A have no idea why the numbers vary so much, maybe because of underlying methodology (pretty much all counted since 1925-1930 until today).

https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertlenzner/2015/01/02/bull-markets-last-five-times-longer-than-bear-markets/
https://www.ftportfolios.com/Common/ContentFileLoader.aspx?ContentGUID=4ecfa978-d0bb-4924-92c8-628ff9bfe12d
https://paulmerriman.com/22-things-know-bear-markets/
https://www.mackenzieinvestments.com/en/assets/documents/marketingmaterials/mm-bull-bear-markets-sp500-en.pdf

Entry points:

31 and 10
48 and 14
108 and 16.8
97 and 18

If, for simplification purposes, we ignore the duration and just focus on bull/bear ratio, then we get bull/bear duration (proportion) at 3.1, 3.42, 5.38 and 6.43.

Applying these numbers back to the prior bitcoin bull that lasted approx 35mo (which is very similar to the first two aforementioned stock market bulls, incidentally), then 3.1 ratio would give us 11.3mo bear, 3.42-10.2 mo, 5.38-6.5 mo and the last 5.44 mo bear.
That said, the latter corresponds to a very long bull, which we did not have; ours was more like the first two.
5.44 mo from Dec 16 is the end of May, which is most optimistic with October-Nov of 2018 fitting data a bit better

TL;DR this model suggests a 5.44-11.3 mo long bear, which indicates bear lasting until May 30-Nov 24, 2018.



184. Post 33563993 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on March 31, 2018, 01:15:34 AM
Just home after a Bday evening of a friend Reading last 2WO pages and willing to spend my very precious LAST Smerit, but better wait to tommorrow So i can actually send iT with al my best to the best meme video/pic that gives me joy and pleasure for the rest of the merit sources PUMP me the F*** up same as you wanne see BTC pump the F*** up So a have Some ammo to send around ;-)  Cool  Roll Eyes  Tongue

if i were you, i would have given it to two great bottoms  Grin



185. Post 33567726 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: explorer on March 31, 2018, 02:49:58 AM

I'd like to trade in my wife for one of those. How many bitcorn would it cost me?

Most likely all of them...

for everything else, there's Monero  Grin

short term bottoms...they don't last.



186. Post 33704284 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on April 01, 2018, 06:41:01 PM
if you're one of the 15 (10? 5? 1?) percent of traders which are profitable - congratulations!

yep, the more you trade, the less likely is that you would be profitable.
that is, if you are human and not an algo.

re gold: maybe not a bad idea, but how would I know that it is real gold and not fake with all these cases of high quality fake gold spreading lately. Bitcoin cannot be fake.

Re lambo- nice ride, congrats.



187. Post 33713784 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

An interesting take on bitcoin (it could have been posted here, but it is a first time I have seen it):

https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/john-pfeffer/An+Investor%27s+Take+on+Cryptoassets+v6.pdf

Major points:

1. $4.4-9.9 tril final value for the store of value use, but could rapidly (months) increase to $1.5 tril (which is about $112K or $86k fully diluted). My opinion: he wrote it when btc was at 15-17K, so run up in months to $1.5 tril would be postponed, most likely.

2. An interesting comparison with AMZN, which was $107 in 2000 but was $1600 recently. In between AMZN declined to $5-6.
The author says that if you calculate by dec 2017 AMZN price, it increased "only" by 14% yearly between buying during internet "bubble" peak and Dec 2017. I recalculated to the recent AMZN peak of $1600 and it is rather 16.5% yearly.
However, if you count from 2001 AMZN low of  5.76, you'll get 39.5% yearly return from 2001-2018.
Well , 39.5 is much better than 14-16.5%, but even 16.5% is OK.

I guess my point is that those who bought at $17-20K would be similar to investors who bought AMZN at around $100 in 2000 and those who bought either earlier (up to btc $1000) or later (at the bottom whenever it comes) would be in a similar situation to AMZN buyers at either IPO or in 2001. They would just have to wait maybe a decade or so. The upper target in the article is 260-800K/btc.



188. Post 33806644 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: bones261 on April 03, 2018, 03:26:44 AM
15 minute candle


HMM, I heard a rumor that the OTC market has been rather brisk today. wonder if it is true.

https://twitter.com/CharlieShrem/status/980954140888223750
https://twitter.com/Disruptepreneur/status/980940740564942848

I call BS on these rumors.
Who would do such a thing?
It's too early for governments to start buying btc as a part of a basket of currencies.



189. Post 33886140 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: Torque on April 04, 2018, 01:20:47 AM
What would be of crypto without all its nonsense drama?

They probably don't realize it or care, but it's people like Roger, CSW, and Mcafee that are hindering mass adoption. They are putting the face of crazy on Bitcoin and crypto. Average Joes don't want to be associated with such nonsense.

I kind of agree with the point, but here is a counterpoint: Elon Musk (an absolute WS and MSM hero in the last few years) sometimes does say a nonsensical thing or two, but his latest joke was roundly criticized. Why? Because CEO of a company which stock declined 30% and debt was downgraded and is trading at 90c/$ should not make these kind of jokes.
Conclusion: when your stock is hot, everyone ignores a misstep or two, but when it is declining fairly rapidly, you should be a bit more CRAEFUL with what you say, I guess.

TL;DR this is not about bch, Roger or CSW, but rather about nonsensical statements and mass adoption/perception.



190. Post 34165941 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 07, 2018, 04:43:11 PM
very quick short list  for a small "game list" or how i have to call it..... only  when breaking 12288 dollar price.....  almost same rules as the list before just a winning date AND
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              .15 BTC for correct date
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              only accounts with minimum 5 Merit and 20 activity (last time to many new pop't up Roll Eyes  )
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              LIST CLOSES tuesday 12 CET allways CET time  no execptions
just for quick enjoyment

normal tommorrow i look @the dates.... firts one posted has the choosen date , some one with the same date have too take another one so look out a bit....
DATES sended in PERSONAL MESSAGE will    NOT count

let us break back 5-digits

June 22, 2018



191. Post 34258803 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on April 08, 2018, 11:17:51 PM


London is outside of the Republic of London on this map  Grin



192. Post 34265699 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: TERA2 on April 09, 2018, 03:29:54 AM
Im starting to see profiles on dating sites that most just say that they're 'into crypto'. Are these prostitutes?

perhaps, just someone with strong "nesting" instincts.



193. Post 34728034 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.52h):

I would like a place with nice weather Wink where I may eventually retire.
The whole ERTH thing started to get on my nerves. Too much crap all over.
I would like to have an ability to be left pretty much alone with my immediate family, yet maintain some western style comforts.
Too much to ask?



194. Post 35055935 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.52h):

Quote from: jbreher on April 19, 2018, 01:22:24 AM
In theory all the oxygen in the room you currently reside in could go to the roof, leaving your with a nice mix of co2 and nitrate to try breathing. In theory.

Not without an influx of energy in order to overcome the entropy.

Energy, entropy...how about a block universe idea (strangely rhyming with blockchain).
I think that blockchain now informs some new interesting ideas in physics.

Read an interesting discussion on time, entropy and block universe here:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/a-debate-over-the-physics-of-time-20160719/



195. Post 35647863 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.53h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on April 26, 2018, 12:42:25 PM
Your shitcoin ponzis are collapsing around you, your frauds are exposed, your bags worthless.
We the people hold over 75% of all the sound money there will ever be in this world.
Maybe a few of you have a few thousand btc? So does the guy in his boxers, and he knows how to secure it against you and your black vans.
The bitcoin protocol ticks over with or without you.
Whaddayagonnado?


Don't give them any ideas, please.
Remember what FDR did in 1933?
I fully expect an attempt to dissociate early adopters from their bitcoin in due course.
How? I have a few concerns/potential routes, not going to spell it out.
Will it succeed? Hopefully, not, but you can't seriously expect PTB to acquiesce with just 4-5 mil (at the most) ownership out of the final 21 mil.
I think that PTB did not start buying until the middle of last year, hence the math.



196. Post 35654066 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.53h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on April 26, 2018, 04:20:09 PM
The bitcoin protocol ticks over with or without you.
Whaddayagonnado?


Don't give them any ideas, please.
Remember what FDR did in 1933?
I fully expect an attempt to dissociate early adopters from their bitcoin in due course.


If you're talking opsec, 'laws' or propaganda, please share, so we can prepare.


It's already started:
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610809/lets-destroy-bitcoin/

some of the suggestions there are silly, especially the one where facebook makes a wallet and that wallet somehow will represent bitcoin takeover by facebok, lol, but more "suggestions" will be coming.

I expect that most will be associated with ownership disclosures, blacklisting/whitelisting, current absence of true fungibility, etc.



197. Post 35681680 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.53h):

Don't wait too long to buy...

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2018-04-26/pantera-s-morehead-says-bitcoin-is-a-screaming-buy-video

Few interesting points:
1. Panthera is most definitely the oldest bitcoin and crypto focused hedge fund.
2. They are currently 90% long, 10% short in crypto space (now have more positions than just bitcoin).
3. Says that btc is undervalued 10-100X until fair value.
4. Projects up to $40 trillion in crypto in about 10 years, compares to $9 tril in gold and $100 tril in global M2.
(see starting at about 5:40 or so)

Nice.



198. Post 35844003 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.53h):

Quote from: Torque on April 29, 2018, 04:08:16 AM
Most people just don't have the patience to hold any asset for a long period of time before selling. They feel that 1-3 years is about all they can do before they get the itch to liquidate.

The other reason that most people don't 'get rich' is they simply never invest *enough* in the first place.


I have a few points on this...

1. When you are young, 3 years is almost an eternity.
2. When you were even younger, you did not have the luxury of watching what happened to a stock a decade after you held it for a few years, then sold. Grant you, in most cases it would be NOTHING, but cases like AAPL or AMZN make you learn something and, hopefully, use later.
3. When you are younger, you usually don't have enough capital to invest meaningful sums, hence #1-2.
4. Sometimes I wonder if enjoying life more at the moment beats having more money later. For once, if you eventually get to a decrepitude stage with $100 mil worth of btc (say, in a few decades), then I have to ask: The f-k you are going to do with it? Give it to the second and third generation so they can do something stupid with it?
5. Overall, people tend to sell winning investments too soon and hold losers for too long. It's basic psychology. Avoiding taking/booking a loss.
People investing in stocks either lose everything or at best brake even. I zeroed one brokerage account myself some years ago.




199. Post 35844721 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: Torque on April 29, 2018, 05:38:11 AM

In terms of price growth, I'm more apt to believe a trajectory based on logarithmic regression and Metcalfes' Law where the price growth slows down over time:



So in 16 years, we'd be lucky to be at a few mil. Maybe ~$10M if we're really lucky.

That's actually not Metcalfe's law, but a modification that he does not agree with (nlogn instead of n^2)
It was made by Odlyzko and Briscoe under the title "Metcalfe's law is wrong" (sic!)
See here:
https://vcmike.wordpress.com/2006/08/18/metcalfe-social-networks/

That said, who knows what the graph would show in 10 years.



200. Post 36061087 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on May 01, 2018, 07:39:06 PM

Amateurs.

I'm HODLing to buy entire Solar Systems at a time.

I call dibs on HD 85512.

HD 85512
Surface gravity: 4.39g

hmmm, maybe if you are a weightlifter.
thre might be something better available, like Proxima Centauri b or Trappist 1.
More coming, there will be planet inflation soon.



201. Post 36169798 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on May 03, 2018, 04:08:04 AM
mBTC looks good.  I have to say using Bitcoin for small value purchases is way too hard.

Personally, I like btc, but fully admit that it is difficult. Have to check my zeroes a couple of times.
mBTC would be fleeting too if btc increases 10-100X
We should get to satoshis at $0.01-1.00, then everything would be easy  Grin

Sidenote: VB getting a genius prize is incompatible with eth receiving a spankdown a few days earlier in the hands of the SEC, IMHO, hence the largish bump.
Ohanian, though, LOL. He is the one who slipped one extra zero in there.



202. Post 36170480 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: Anon136 on May 03, 2018, 04:33:50 AM
mBTC looks good.  I have to say using Bitcoin for small value purchases is way too hard.

Personally, I like btc, but fully admit that it is difficult. Have to check my zeroes a couple of times.
mBTC would be fleeting too if btc increases 10-100X
We should get to satoshis at $0.01-1.00, then everything would be easy  Grin

I really feel like the whole mBTC and uBTC thing is wrongheaded. We shouldn't be thinking about it as fractions of BTC. We should be thinking in terms of satoshis and building up. Like bytes in computing vs the metric standard. Kilosatoshi (kSat), Megasatoshi (mSat), and Gigasatoshi (gSat), ect... It's so much more natural to think in terms of multiples than fractions. Plus we are much more the spiritual successor of the computing standards than the metric standard. 1 kSat soon to hit 0.1 USD!

With btc increasing about 10X from today, I see it too.
At btc $100K:

Hiring a new developer "Q: What is your current monthly compensation? A: Twenty mega[Sat]s...
Sat is silent, of course.



203. Post 36259566 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: Ibian on May 04, 2018, 02:52:32 AM
General reminder that co2 is not a pollutant, comrade.

Not a pollutant for plants, they love it.
However, increasing Co2 does affect mental functions.
see graphs: 21% decrease in mental functions upon doubling of Co2 from 400ppm (now) to 800
https://www.advancedsciencenews.com/co2-on-the-brain-and-the-brain-on-co2
Quote
At some threshold yet to be defined but thought to be around a 1000 ppm, human cognition will begin to be negatively impacted. Latest research indicates we could attain this threshold outdoors in the next century, and the dissipation of CO2 in our atmosphere takes centuries.

Regardless on the "politically charged" question of what is causing it (the Co2 increase), if it increases, we will be progressively live in Idiocracy.
Sometimes I already feel it in talking to some people (not here).
Maybe, this is the Great Filter (a concept explaining the absence of visible super-civilizations a.k.a Fermi Paradox).



204. Post 36262126 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: Ibian on May 04, 2018, 04:53:17 AM
General reminder that co2 is not a pollutant, comrade.

Not a pollutant for plants, they love it.
However, increasing Co2 does affect mental functions.
see graphs: 21% decrease in mental functions upon doubling of Co2 from 400ppm (now) to 800
https://www.advancedsciencenews.com/co2-on-the-brain-and-the-brain-on-co2
Quote
At some threshold yet to be defined but thought to be around a 1000 ppm, human cognition will begin to be negatively impacted. Latest research indicates we could attain this threshold outdoors in the next century, and the dissipation of CO2 in our atmosphere takes centuries.

Regardless on the "politically charged" question of what is causing it (the Co2 increase), if it increases, we will be progressively live in Idiocracy.
Sometimes I already feel it in talking to some people (not here).
Maybe, this is the Great Filter (a concept explaining the absence of visible super-civilizations a.k.a Fermi Paradox).
Now you just need to explain how a doubling could possibly happen.

That's the damn problem with catastrophic predictions, if it is built on one thing that can't happen the whole thing falls apart.

From the quoted article:

Quote
In a reported study, it was found that in a substantial number of poorly ventilated classrooms and workplaces, CO2 levels can average 1000 ppm, a significant proportion of these exceeded 2000 ppm and some even reached 3000 ppm.

Some are already affected, most likely.
Don't believe this, get a whiff of Co2 from the dry ice.
It helps to put things in perspective.

for the accelerated annual Co2 increase, check out the graph here:
https://e360.yale.edu/digest/co2-levels-continue-to-increase-at-record-rate

However, even at a steady 2% yearly increase (which is 33% less than in 2015) with no more acceleration, we would reach 800ppm in open air in about 35 years.



205. Post 36264103 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: Ibian on May 04, 2018, 05:42:12 AM

Okay so you got nothing. We are not talking about underfunded fucking public schools here. Don't waste peoples time.

I gave you a link with a graph at
https://e360.yale.edu/digest/co2-levels-continue-to-increase-at-record-rate
and you talk about public schools?
Check it out instead.
Plus, get out your android (or, maybe, blackberry) and input 1.02 in x^y function for years needed to double CO2.
What would you get? Fucking 35 years.
Deal with it, or not, your choice.
To me this is about survival of the society, not government involvement and i don't even care what exactly is causing this.



206. Post 36264991 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: Anon136 on May 04, 2018, 06:00:26 AM
people believe in terraforming but climate change is a myth?

Someday when it comes time to terraform our first planet we can just build lots of cars with no catalytic converters and drive them around on the surface.


replace cars with volcanoes and arrive at how this planet was terraformed when sun's activity was 30% less than today.
http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~infocom/The%20Website/evolution.html

However, by the end of the next 600mil years CO2 will disappear and plants would die.
So, yeah, high Co2 is temporary.
In about 1bil years all oceans would evaporate and plate tectonics would stop.
In the end of the next 4.8 bil years, the sun would be 67% brighter, and Earth would be torched.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_Earth



207. Post 36265491 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

^^^without science you would still "drive around" with a horse and buggy and work back bending routines for 14hr in the fields.
That would be something.



208. Post 36266258 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: explorer on May 04, 2018, 06:25:07 AM




In actuality, the longer the trend is in place, the more it is likely it is to continue, jokes aside.
This is true for stock markets and CO2 as well, I surmise.
Co2 increase is there and accelerating for the last 60 years (see again the same link), so it is LIKELY to continue, but not guaranteed, of course.



209. Post 36266734 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: explorer on May 04, 2018, 06:29:33 AM
^^^without science you would still "drive around" with a horse and buggy and work back bending routines for 14hr in the fields.
That would be something.

Or sit on my horse, watching my serfs reap the harvest...

Someone's gotta do it.

I would rather chill in my self driving space car on the way to my Moon solarium loft while doing something kinky with my genetically enhanced partner in zero g, but that's just me. You can dream some dark dreams, I prefer better ones.



210. Post 42168910 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on July 14, 2018, 01:21:56 PM
So guys, after reading a bit aroud this incoming ETF thing, I didn't decided yet whether this event will pump or dump the price!

Plus it is not clear whether this time the application will be finally approved!

What do you think?

None of the previous attempts were successful so why would this one be any different?

I don’t forsee it gaining approval, no.
I do hope I’m wrong though because if it was approved I think the price would pump significantly.

It has a chance of approval because it is positioned as 'NOT for plebs' ETF and we all know that SEC only cares about that crowd.
Even with $6000 btc, each share in this ETF will cost $150,000.



211. Post 42242748 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

F-g divers won with the help of a wicked bounce and a controversial VAR against the team that was a bit tired after previous heroics in three extra times. Definitely wasn't rooting for them after all that diving in the semifinal. Disgusting.



212. Post 42245178 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on July 15, 2018, 06:24:18 PM
My stupid country won the world cup, very bearish

Don’t tell me.... the stupid asses driving down Mallorca with there france flags 🤮  Roll Eyes

well, enjoy it while it lasts...



213. Post 42248851 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: Anon136 on July 15, 2018, 06:36:24 PM
Football supporters are monkeys. And it's insulting to monkeys.

If you are trying to rile them up call it soccer.

The f-k you two are blabbering about?
Signed: Great ape/primate.



214. Post 42252901 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 15, 2018, 08:23:13 PM
Why is this thread 90% bullshit, merit circlejerking and off topics?

You have something better in mind while we wait for the halvening in 2020?

All those who base price of bitcoin on pretty pictures do it at your own peril.
With current prices it would take only twofold increase in mining difficulty to make mining unprofitable almost worldwide with few exceptions.

Bitcoin cannot exist in its current state without mining.
So, pretty much two scenarios: die or price increase. Way before halving.
There could be NOTHING else.



215. Post 42254218 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: bitcoinPsycho on July 15, 2018, 08:42:34 PM

you'd better sell them quick then . Im holding the bag and have everything to gain

You've got it exactly backwards, bud.
If YOU will not increase the value of btc by buying more, then I (and others) would seize to support you and process your transactions.
Case closed.

So, pretty please, with a cherry on top, BUY more btc it you want it to survive.
Your cooperation is appreciated.



216. Post 42257936 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 15, 2018, 09:17:54 PM
Why is this thread 90% bullshit, merit circlejerking and off topics?

You have something better in mind while we wait for the halvening in 2020?

All those who base price of bitcoin on pretty pictures do it at your own peril.
With current prices it would take only twofold increase in mining difficulty to make mining unprofitable almost worldwide with few exceptions.

Bitcoin cannot exist in its current state without mining.
So, pretty much two scenarios: die or price increase. Way before halving.
There could be NOTHING else.

There’s this thing called a difficulty adjustment.  It can go up, but relevantly can also go down.  With low enough difficulty the entire network can be run with a single laptop from 2009.  

I still have a laptop from 2009.  We will be fine.

PS the miners were never intended on being a separate group from the users. Satoshi didn’t foresee ASICs.  Live and learn.

Before difficulty adjusts, time passes. If fast enough drop in hashing occurs, instead of adjusting, tx would have difficulty being mined (for a significant time period).
By the time you could use your laptop again the value would be in the single $, presumably.



217. Post 42258027 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: jojo69 on July 15, 2018, 09:22:07 PM
lol

nobody is going to stop mining

fool me once...shame on...shame on you...fool me, can't get fooled again



2% already did, presumably, or more accurately, 2% of hashing rate retired (temporarily or permanently).
There might be another 10% in the next mo if price stays the same.



218. Post 42261658 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: yefi on July 16, 2018, 12:43:37 AM
Before difficulty adjusts, time passes. If fast enough drop in hashing occurs, instead of adjusting, tx would have difficulty being mined (for a significant time period).
By the time you could use your laptop again the value would be in the single $, presumably.

We've already had two halvenings, a hardfork with bcash and 80-90% drops in price and this "heat death" scenario has never materialised.

Perhaps, and I hope so (that it stays this way);
I was just pointing out to two groups of posters (pure hodlers and pretty picture TA guys) that there is a price sensitive component (mining) that, in my opinion, is being stressed right now. My suggestion is to buy more btc if you want your btc to persevere.
Simple HODLing won't work.



219. Post 42307755 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

yesterday's rant =>today's gain
however, i am not falling into
post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy

No, siree  Tongue.



220. Post 42429653 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: infofront on July 18, 2018, 05:40:25 PM

What's the actual tax rate in the states, anyway? In my country it's about 80%. 50% income tax, 25% sales tax and a whole bunch of taxes that are not openly advertised on anything you buy adding up to another 50%.

How much of your labor needs to be taken away before you no longer consider yourself "free"?

Then, there are property taxes. These vary widely and are based on the value of your home. Mine are something like $2,400/year.

State sales tax is typically around 6-7%. There is no federal sales tax.

There are other taxes, which are hidden from most people, such as corporate income taxes, gasoline tax, etc.

Man, I wish my RE taxes were this low.
In TX they are INSANELY high.
$10K on a moderately valued home. It's a high replacement of state tax.
I am not retired, but a typical retiree cannot pay this.



221. Post 42442288 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.01h):

Quote from: Anon136 on July 18, 2018, 09:47:28 PM
Ok, assuming for the sake of argument that $3k is nonsense. There are some good looking white people. Not me personally, but I've seen some.  

Beautiful Aryan woman look like gods among mortals. When they open their mouths you are reminded that they are far from divine. But before they speak one could fool themselves into thinking they are another form of life entirely, something transcendent, something designed to rule over all of the lesser creatures.


It's just cultural references, that's all.
Europeans/caucasians tend to think that European faces are beautiful.
Chinese have a different beauty model.

It's the overall body and face shape that makes an impact, not melatonin ratios necessarily.
Halle Berry (at a young age) looked absolutely stunning to me, albeit I am a caucasian.

Also, people are drawn to opposites: tall and short, skinny and 'torrid', dark hair vs blond (Tiger Woods' blonds).
It makes perfect sense from genetics point of view (unconscious drive to genetic heterozygosity-heterosis or hybrid vigor).



222. Post 42747640 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.02h):

ha ha, ASCII pics, so 70ies.  Grin



223. Post 42766227 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.02h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 24, 2018, 04:17:16 AM
Sorry I’m not confident we have bottomed. I think the ETF application will fail and the arse will fall out of the price.  Then we bottom in early 2019.  

This is a nice interim rally and lays the foundations for the long term recovery.

You are thinking that we are repeating 2014-2015, condensed into 12 mo?

My thinking is that, perhaps, we are experiencing extended 2013 whereas beginning of 2017 is roughly= beginning of 2013, then dec 2017 peak is an equivalent of april 2013 interim peak, current lows are the equivalent of june-July 2013 interim bottom (at roughly 25-30% of April's 2013 peak) and now we are about to go (maybe by September) into a superbull until late 2018, early-mid 2019, which according to this analogy should be at about 90K, believe it or not.

Both scenarios are possible, but I give slightly higher probability to mine (maybe 60:40 or 70:30)  Wink



224. Post 42936353 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.02h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on July 26, 2018, 08:52:16 PM
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/26/winklevoss-twins-bitcoin-etf-rejected-by-sec.html
wtf etf?
https://twitter.com/CNBC/status/1022586017734426624

Zuck might have called SEC to do it today just to lift his spirits  Grin
Sidenote: twins cannot get a f-g brake.



225. Post 42936789 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.02h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 26, 2018, 09:01:55 PM

No ETF because...bitcoin is traded outside the US.

Unlike gold, oil, etc.?

In fiat some get vastly different interest rates then the rest of us.
As a result, in fiat system some (with interest rates close to zero) can accumulate vast amounts of assets.

Don't expect the unfair system to play fair with the competition.



226. Post 43039509 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: Kylapoiss on July 28, 2018, 02:56:24 PM
I think the order of the world, how it works and why we even got where we are now has very much to do with bitcoin. Politics=money, money=bitcoin? Aren't we here to change the principles of the whole financial world? Doesn't history apply to that?


which nationality are you, if I may ask?



227. Post 43103030 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: fabiorem on July 29, 2018, 03:29:26 PM
I just need to point out that the bear market of 2013-2015 was not exactly three years, but one year and a half. Since it covered three years, people think they were full three years, which is not the case.



even less than 1.5 years: from Nov 2013 to Jan 2015 (if measured from high to low)=about 14 mo, but it felt like infinity, especially since the recovery was really tepid until almost the end of 2015.



228. Post 43164816 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: B1tUnl0ck3r on July 30, 2018, 12:31:24 PM

It is so funny how it fits the american way....

facebook, twitter, google, all seek to censor to oppress, dominate control and rape, while tencent and co try to create a better china.

what happened to my america? I think it's the whorization of the entire female populations, behind their illusory quest for domination, that lead most americans males to fall so low... all wanna be the next


I don't know about whorization-I don't see it on a mass scale, but another statement is true:
every single american corporation want's to mess you up: shady fees, sudden price increases, not doing their job, etc.

A couple examples:
1. Airlines who made distances between seats so small, it is positively UNCOMFORTABLE experience, unless you pay for 1st class.
2. Healthcare companies that send you a letter of their commitment for a certain timeframe, then suddenly renege while providing highly technical mumbo-jumbo response about why they did it. I can translate it: we f-k you because we can and you should enjoy it.

I intend to focus on bitcoin/crypto because I see this is the ONLY way out of this situation, but not everyone would be able to do it, hence a campaign to decrease attraction to bitcoin by spreading FUD.

Smart people in finances (like Bill Miller) are openly suggesting to large fiat holders to buy bitcoin/crypto ASAP. If he/they do it in the open it means that not much time is left before a large upswing.



229. Post 43291425 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on August 01, 2018, 05:37:38 PM
The imaginations in this thread are above average based on what i've seen.  You could at least humour them with a couple of tidbits Smiley

He's my father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate.

Spaceballs! [one of my favorites]



230. Post 43432216 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 04, 2018, 02:49:15 AM
When my hairdresser knows what it is it's mainstream (and it's not yet).

Should have sold when my hairdresser told me about BTC in December 2017.

Why? You can never time these buys and sells again and again.
This game would play over a decade or a decade and a half (if one starts counting from 2013).
By 2023-2028 we will see how it shakes out.



231. Post 43470510 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

To thread TA people: this is a pretty good long term take, in my opinion, with some interesting references (by D. Masters):

https://medium.com/coinshares/history-rhymes-it-rarely-repeats-beware-of-the-extrapolations-5a1a7d973442

I can live with a couple trillion market cap by 2022  Grin



232. Post 43545889 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: Torque on August 05, 2018, 05:15:29 PM
Bitcoin is now in the back of *everyone's* mind. But currently they're all focused on other stuff.

What comes next is gonna be epic.

Agree, and that's why I see NYSE/Starbucks as fiat head honchos "counterattack" against bitcoin.
They are trying to put a middleman in the middle of bitcoin, especially when Microsoft, known for it's "embrace and extend" credo, is involved.

It is threatening to the whole bitcoin appeal, hence an immediate drop in value.
I personally think that this story would derail the real btc boom (at least for a while).



233. Post 43551530 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 05, 2018, 08:51:04 PM

I am not sure if I understand the pyramid.

The way that I see it is that there is actual accumulated wealth and there is annual income.

Of course, if you accumulate more wealth then the accumulated wealth can provide a higher income, otherwise you are dependent upon others for providing your annual income.

Also, the more that you are able to live on resources that are below your annual income, then the more that you will be able to accumulate wealth and to therefore aspire to accumulate enough wealth in order to be able to have your assets support your lifestyle (and likely retaining some additional cushion, too).

The pyramid does not seem to be complete, and it seems to be depicting accumulated wealth without juxtaposing that with annual income, right?  Or am I missing something?

That's just liquid wealth (typically consisting of liquid assets not including main house equity) pyramid without taking income into consideration.
Source for the latest:
https://www.credit-suisse.com/corporate/en/articles/news-and-expertise/global-wealth-pyramid-decreased-base-201801.html



234. Post 43552095 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 05, 2018, 09:09:31 PM


$20k just seems like too much in the middle.. so to me, just does not seem to be like a sufficiently eggregious "blow off top."

The projected blow-off top of 30-50K was 'terminated" with the use of futures.
Without futures deployment mid December, we would probably 'heated' up to that 30-50K number within a week or two.



235. Post 43554747 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on August 05, 2018, 09:59:36 PM


$20k just seems like too much in the middle.. so to me, just does not seem to be like a sufficiently eggregious "blow off top."

The projected blow-off top of 30-50K was 'terminated" with the use of futures.
Without futures deployment mid December, we would probably 'heated' up to that 30-50K number within a week or two.

$30-50K still seems too much in the middle. $100k seems like a nice round number for an Autumn blow off top.  Tongue

Yes, it (100K) could become an attractor.



236. Post 43556730 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 05, 2018, 10:49:13 PM


If they hypotheticate and re-hypothicate the s-t out of bitcoin like they did with gold, than it would not be bitcoin anymore, but something else.

@gentlemand posted this elsewhere:
https://www.ccn.com/interview-wall-street-vet-warns-of-ice-bringing-bad-banking-practices-to-crypto/



237. Post 43557356 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: d_eddie on August 05, 2018, 11:17:11 PM

If they hypotheticate and re-hypothicate the s-t out of bitcoin like they did with gold, than it would not be bitcoin anymore, but something else.

@gentlemand posted this elsewhere:
https://www.ccn.com/interview-wall-street-vet-warns-of-ice-bringing-bad-banking-practices-to-crypto/

If it's really "bakkt" by verifiable crypto collateral, bad banking practices have no hope.


verifiable? Theoretically, my stock at the brokerage is mine too. Do I know who it was re-hypotheticated to?
Absolutely not, and there is no way to find out.
It would become the same gimmick sooner or later, when "bakkt".



238. Post 43604504 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on August 06, 2018, 05:44:45 PM
A high entrance fee like that will keep the riff-raff out. I'll be the banker.

Naw dude, just sign the invitation from a funded-enough address, to have the address/location/country/planet/galaxy revealed.

No need for bankers or people to HODL admission funds :-)

We have the technology.

just don't bring a phone with funds to this future meetup, witness recent SIM-jacking of crypto conferences attendees (lost $5 mil).



239. Post 43605104 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on August 06, 2018, 06:01:37 PM
We should have a mud-wrestling pit, a mechanical bull, a fabulously erotic gay vodka ice-fountain (none of that Russian shit), and 55-gallon drums of lube around the premises, for starters...


no place for straight folk?
the image of 55 gallon lube canisters does not really excite me in the slightest  Grin.



240. Post 43605244 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on August 06, 2018, 05:58:27 PM
Only 5-10 coins? I thought that was riffraff.

100 coins minimum.  Cool

Edit:

On second thought, no one with any real amount of coins would keep more than a couple dozen in any single wallet.

10 coins it is I guess.

by latest estimates, there are less than 10,000 wallets with more than 100 btc.
I saw the edit.



241. Post 43614078 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 06, 2018, 08:56:08 PM
A high entrance fee like that will keep the riff-raff out. I'll be the banker.

Naw dude, just sign the invitation from a funded-enough address, to have the address/location/country/planet/galaxy revealed.

No need for bankers or people to HODL admission funds :-)

We have the technology.

just don't bring a phone with funds to this future meetup, witness recent SIM-jacking of crypto conferences attendees (lost $5 mil).

Do you have a link?

yeah
https://www.techspot.com/news/75750-20-year-old-college-student-hacked-40-phones.html



242. Post 43614193 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on August 06, 2018, 08:26:14 PM
For certain purposes it's necessary to determine the logical cross-bearings of the concepts which we take for granted. But honestly, is there a single not obvious thing in here. You really thought I needed a reintroduction to basic financial literacy by way of cringe-y homespun wisdoms?

Now I'm even more morose!

Aww, don't go down that road. It's closed anyway.



9.5?
Nice



243. Post 43621194 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: turtletime on August 07, 2018, 01:28:16 AM


It's the butterfly effect , you can't just play these stupid hypotheticals and assume the best possible outcome.

We all had these situations again and again.
It does not matter, each timeline is unique, maybe someone who bought in 2010 would have lost it on Mt. Gox, etc., etc.

It's like you could have bought Apple or Microsoft for pennies. Yeah, you could have, but the chances that you would have kept that stock for 20-30 years are very very low.

S. Ammous says that most of those with a lot of btc will inevitably sell at some point and I generally agree, to a point (maybe not everything).

That point is different for each one, but, let's say at a price higher by one or two orders of magnitude, who would not at least sell a chunk that establishes a nice lifestyle for a few decades? Would you grimly hodl that btc or would you rather enjoy yourself a bit (vacations, houses, dining, entertainment, etc)? Only very few may be able to resist.

In fact, i think that a large portion of current hodlers would have sold a large chunk if btc levitated at $20K for a few months. It just went up and down a bit too fast.



244. Post 43624563 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 07, 2018, 04:26:07 AM
That girl is a 6/10 at most,.

Sorry guy. The resident gay dude is rating her a hard 8/10, at the very least, just on that photo alone.

Rick is being catty this evening, and is feeling generous with a 7/10 rating.

No way is that a 6.
She looks young enough to go on and on about Justin Bieber all.... night.... long.....

6. With earplugs, 7.

Are you judging her looks or her personality?   Looks are a 9, from a raging hetero here.  


Yes.. 8 at least, and with the headlights, surely approaching a 9.   Wink

6-7?
Maybe 9.5 is too high, but there are some nice qualities there, so high 8 up to 9 is the lowest I can agree with  Smiley.



245. Post 43672343 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.03h):

Tesla..ha ha
what a f-k up

Imagine the pandemonium if Satoshi suddenly re-appeared with a proposal to take btc "private" at 22K/btc.
You could keep it, but cannot transact with it, just surrender at his price.
LOL.



246. Post 43740898 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Here is a short take on generations, inflation, btc and gold (with numbers)

Boomers, were born in 1946-1964, with 1955 in the middle of the cohort.
A massive generation (in numbers).
inflation spiked between 1973 and 1980 with 1980 max when interest rates on cash were around 14% (range of 18-25 years from boomer's medium, max at 25 years).
Gold maxed out 25 years after boomers mid (1980).

Millennials (also massive in numbers), were born in 1985-2004 with 1994-1995 in the middle of the cohort.
with each generation lifespan is increasing a bit, so maybe add 2-3 years to the timeline, therefore

Prediction:

Inflation would spike between 21-28 years from the millennial medium aka at around 2016-2023 with around 2023 longterm peak in interest rates (obviously interest rates are already rising since 2016, so it fits).
Instead of gold, millennials would hopefully choose bitcoin, which should peak around 2023 as well (100K, 500k, 1000K, hard to say).
Later projections are difficult because gold faded in the 80ies, yet bitcoin might have/should have staying power.


Cash (in short term bonds, re-investing every time at maturity)+btc is probably the best combo.

Stock market would at best go nowhere in the next 5-10 years if interest rates climb; why do you think E. Musk wants to go private? Because he can't borrow at reasonable rates and selling declining stock is a bad idea.

Same for the real estate. Crashes are possible.

At around 2023, I would convert some portion of btc to long term bonds, which should (at that point) give at least 10% yield, maybe more, would not even need to bother with the stock market.

One relevant conclusion: whatever you do, do not buy annuities and don't believe any pension numbers (of those that don't have a a reasonable COLA).



247. Post 43742109 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Quote from: provalentine on August 09, 2018, 02:30:40 AM
One relevant conclusion: whatever you do, do not buy annuities and don't believe any pension numbers (of those that don't have a a reasonable COLA).
I think that now only assholes and fooled old men pay a pension tax. It would be infinitely good if there was an opportunity to return the taxes paid ... Embarrassed

Not sure if I get it, pal.
80% of educators have pension (in most states in USA) and NO social security.
You can't choose NOT to be in the system if you work at a public University/College, it is simply not allowed (you can only choose defined contribution or defined benefit).



248. Post 43845068 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.04h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on August 10, 2018, 06:27:11 PM
Been planning to get my teeth done there next year by a well known company out there, full set of pearly white veneer’s, very cheap when compared to UK/US prices for similar work.

Care to tell what the price is?
I am OK, but relative recently did such job somehere in europe, so I am curious.
His cost was about $15000 ($10K+$5K) for a full set.

I am not sure how much it is in US, but probably much more and not covered by insurance.
I had a single implant done-it cost thousands, don't remember how much out of the pocket.



249. Post 44141193 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Quote from: leetlezee on August 15, 2018, 06:07:48 PM

Not sure what the heck you all are talking about, but it kinda sounds like fun!  Sad

Meanwhile, Bitmex CEO claims that ETH is going sub-100: https://www.ccn.com/shtcoin-ethereum-price-will-fall-below-100-bitmex-ceo/

Very well may be.
My technical reasons (apart from overall feelings of potential eth inferiority based on many characteristics):
1. eth Jan 2018 peak of 1400 is the the time equivalent of 2013 btc peak. the consequent decline should be at least to $188.
2. btc had several bubbles and declines. This is the first for eth, so, potentially, this is rather an equivalent of btc bubble to bottom move of $32 to $2 (2011). In such case, bottom would be at around $88.

Conclusion: it is entirely possible that eth would bottom at $88-188.



250. Post 44213157 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 16, 2018, 11:06:12 PM
Moar pain mandatory




OR,

maybe there is a declining trend in % dropped.
From about 90% (real number was 93-94%)
to about 80% (about 86% to be exact)
to?

94-86-78?

78% from 19783 is about $4350 (not predicting it because it could be 72-80).



251. Post 44257808 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on August 17, 2018, 07:38:38 PM
It's too quiet in here.

I was just thinking - there are three types of people in this world. Those that can do basic math, and those that can't.

#deepthoughts

Also When price is Going to +5 digits iT Will go PARABOLIC in here

to paraphrase:

5 digits...is not cool
You know what is?
SIX digits!
 Grin



252. Post 44316120 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Quote from: gembitz on August 18, 2018, 08:09:14 PM
I remember in btc-e's trollbox people were saying $40k next year when the price was $1000 in 2014. After 4 years we reached $20k.

Now people are saying $100k in 2020. That means we'll see $50k in 2023 or 2022.



Aktivation occurring //^$20K then rocket up to $250K+ *speedbumps kaint faze me brah


weeeeeee

Unless this is photosynthesis (maybe it is since there is a quant coming in), free energy of reactants should always be HIGHER than products for reaction to proceed spontaneously (especially in case of exergonic reactions). In case of endergonic reactions, extra energy is required.

One thing of note is that enzymes are known to reduce activation energy "bump" required to proceed.
Another thing is that IF free energy of product(s) is LOWER than reactants, then sometimes reaction could still proceed due to quantum tunneling (instead of bumping to overcome activation energy "hill", simply go through the "mountain").

In fact, the latter scenario is potentially viable for the whole universe to disappear IF we are not currently at the lowest energy state.
In such case, a "bubble" of "new vacuum" could appear and spread with a speed of light, literally annihilating current vacuum in its wake.
Thankfully, current calculations make this scenario not very likely to occur.
EDIT: thanks Smiley



253. Post 44429418 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Who wants to play this quizz?
Please, no googling or it s NO FUN:

Your best guess what was the last name of the 'political officer' character in the "Hunt for Red October" movie (1990).
As a reminder, this was the guy whose neck captain Ramius broke to replace the orders with his own edition and initiate the defection plan.

Reply as

Last name:  



254. Post 44481109 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Bitcoin in Dec 2021 (more than 18 mo after halving) would be...

1. At peak (similar to 2013 and 2017)? 100k? 160K?
2. Coming off earlier blowoff peak in 2019-2020?
3. Being stuck in the doldrums, albeit with a higher price of 8K-10k?

IMHO, probabilities (from scenario 1-3) are 40%, 30%, 30%.

Your opinion?



255. Post 44484922 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on August 21, 2018, 10:18:28 PM
Bitcoin in Dec 2021 (more than 18 mo after halving) would be...

1. At peak (similar to 2013 and 2017)? 100k? 160K?
2. Coming off earlier blowoff peak in 2019-2020?
3. Being stuck in the doldrums, albeit with a higher price of 8K-10k?

IMHO, probabilities (from scenario 1-3) are 40%, 30%, 30%.

Your opinion?
Is your last name Bear lol?
1. 810k 25%
2. 5%
3. 2%
4. Going up fast 10%
5. Dipping 58%


none of scenarios 1-3 are truly bearish, but #3 would suck, I agree.
#2: I meant that similar peak (100-160K) occurs earlier (in 2019-2020) and btc would correcting by Dec 2021.



256. Post 44629895 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.05h):

I don't think that it is easy to purchase straight btc in ret funds.
As a surrogate, there is that swedish ETN (Bitcoin Tracker One, ticker CXBTF in US) that you can theoretically purchase for $ in US now.

You can do it in Fidelity, under two conditions:
1. You have to sign some kind of agreement that says that you are, basically, a most aggressive investor who may lose all of your money.
2. It also costs extra $50 fee for a foreign settle, so this only make some sense for larger purchases.

Strangely enough, you can see the quote on Ameritrade, but rep on the phone told me that I cannot buy it (at least in ret. account), even though I have the most aggressive status there too (to trade options, albeit very infrequently).



257. Post 44999089 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

I only need to know a couple of things about future btc status:

1. what is its price by the second half of 2021 (June-Dec)?
2. what is its price by December 2023?

re #1 my hope is $100K and the world is largely intact
re #2 my hope for btc is $200K (after a sharp correction in 2022) and same as above for the world as a whole.



258. Post 45046327 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Those who keep saying that this research is Bloomberg, no, it is not.
It's some private firm (Salanis, spelling?).
they are obviously long btc and even longer xmr.
Numbers that they throw around are weird.

Re tits and older fellas....research NMN...prof Sinclair... maybe it would work (in anti-aging), maybe not.
Clinical trials will start in 2020.
Current cost $35K/day.

Prior research on resveratrol did not pan out in humans.
I actually took resveratrol for 24 mo.
Personal experience: lost 15 lb, however, by the end of 24 mo (and throughout) had some side effects in form of random muscle pain.
At the end of 24 mo my muscle tone and a sense of well being were actually slightly reduced, so I stopped.




259. Post 45348930 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: Paashaas on September 07, 2018, 03:50:54 PM
Elon Musk smoking a joint...lol.



A move to temporarily lower your stock price and make private equity guys pounce?
Sometimes I think that Reed Hastings did something similar (remember nonsense with services renaming, etc).
Netflix stock went from $300 to $50-60 where real biggies (like Icahn) loaded up.
The rest is current history.

Note to myself: if Tesla goes to 50-80, buy a LOT.



260. Post 45349198 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on September 07, 2018, 06:06:32 PM
Elon Musk smoking a joint...lol.



A move to temporarily lower your stock price and make private equity guys pounce?
Sometimes I think that Reed Hastings did something similar (remember nonsense with services renaming, etc).
Netflix stock went from $300 to $50-60 where real biggies (like Icahn) loaded up.
The rest is current history.

Note to myself: if Tesla goes to 50-80, buy a LOT.


I've never shorted a stock in my life (too chicken shit) but I was so tempted to short Tesla a few weeks ago.  

It would have paid for quite a few fine dining outings and dresses Wink
I knew it was a short when he said all that nonsense about going private without anyone backing the idea.
Too bad I can't short in my main retirement account (which is the biggest, sizewize).



261. Post 45359867 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on September 07, 2018, 11:14:33 PM
Had a chat to someone involved in the CBOE futures.

He says that SEC not happy with market surveillance on physical markets and thinks they are all bucket shops.

Which we all know is true - fucking Bitmex and Bitfinex and HitBTC.  Even Kraken and Coinbase are shit shows.

We won’t get an ETF until we get higher quality Bitcoin exchanges next year (like Baakt and the Toronto Stock Exchange).  And those new exchanges are going to take some time to establish a track record of liquidity.  Which fits in nicely with the halvening time line.  The stars are lining up about a year out.

lol, I am sure that they are happy with ETFs like these:

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/UNG?p=UNG&.tsrc=fin-srch
or
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/USO?p=USO&.tsrc=fin-srch

f-g robbery, but I really don't care much as I never bought them.

As a tactic, I would go long physical BTC ETF and would short futures based one.
This is the way to go.



262. Post 45391214 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: vapourminer on September 08, 2018, 03:14:28 PM

so im using part of my stack to diversify into different non crypto holding in case it all goes south.

maybe because i got into it fairly early, i still see it as a tool to be used, not as a "get rich" thing. although i hope we all do. but currently im using it now to secure our (wife and i) future with as little risk as possible.
 
so on average for the last few years i have generally spent more btc than i replace. at this stage in my life  i have changed some priorities and used btc profit to try and ensure a more than comfortable retirement (if all goes even close to well). we were at the point that retirement should go well for us anyway but its time to revisit that position and nail down a few potential lose ends. once im happy with that i will go back to accumulation. at least i hope to.

 

What about a situation if/when fiat goes 'south'. All calculations would be out of the window, then.
IMHO, we are within 5 years of , perhaps, a low double digit inflation episode.
What then?



263. Post 45410747 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.06h):

Quote from: infofront on September 09, 2018, 02:38:01 AM
Fuck this just capitulated on ETH and sold for BTC.

I'm holding my ETH in hopes we get a pump when futures launch. OTOH, I don't hold enough to lose any sleep over.


I believe ETH will probably die, but not yet. Consider the fact that this is the first, brutal bear market for an ETH holder. It must be pretty scary. I believe this helps cause an exaggerated ETH (and other altcoin) decline. There are no war-forged ETH veterans yet.

First BTC bear was $32 to $2, so if we apply roughly similar numbers, ETH might bottom at around $90 (give or take).
Many prior high-flying eth tokens are already at almost zero volume.



264. Post 45792956 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.07h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on September 16, 2018, 03:40:39 PM
A home is a capital depreciating asset. Bitcoin isn’t.

BUT we do like to live in one  Grin

I get it, but what if we reverse it for an argument's sake.
Can you live IN bitcoin?
A trippy question harking back to "Being John Malkovich"

Can bitcoin be a "vessel"?
This would be clear only to those who watched the movie.
Eventually, at least younger of us would be digitized and reduced to being a digital "presence".
Maybe, then.



265. Post 45993479 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.07h):

Quote from: Phil_S on September 21, 2018, 04:08:48 PM
XRP is number two.

Number Two  haha. ;-)

only a scam or a penny stock trades like this.



266. Post 45993613 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.07h):

Quote from: mfort312 on September 21, 2018, 04:21:27 PM
Hey, let's attempt to crowdsource a bitcointalk response to the SEC's request for further comments on the recently postponed Cboe/SolidX/VanEck ETF proposal. Collectively, I bet we've got an entire cogent brain amongst the likes of us.

Whatever useful comments make it to this thread, I'd say is fair game for anyone to beg, borrow, steal, quote, or plagiarize for their own personal responses to the SEC.

I'll parse out the SEC's 18 wordier-than-even-wordy-man's question topics below. Feel strongly about any of them? Spit it out.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5034689.0



Why should be care about an ETF with a price of $200K/share.



267. Post 46744842 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.09h):

These types of crashes (1987-light) are never precursors to a hard recession, depression, unless tariffs/trade wars are also involved...
Wait a minute....



268. Post 46809885 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.09h):

I am genuinely interested why newbs almost always post some washed-up cringy half-thoughts on WO?

Why not dazzle all of us with something interesting, even if erroneous...



269. Post 46845369 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.09h):

Quote from: yefi on October 13, 2018, 06:20:46 PM

This pattern seems reasonable to me, although I would hope 2021 would have higher prices than they predict. Next year sub $3k most likely. My prediction is based on the last halvings, not sure what those who expect the bull to pick up later this year are doing other than hoping.
https://longforecast.com/bitcoin-price-predictions-2017-2018-2019-btc-to-usd

One should be mindful that the effect of the halving halves each time. We're going from a thud to a tinkle. When the reward is fractions of a bitcoin, who thinks the halving will still be driving price?

The effect of halving does not halve when you count fiat.
A miner still starts getting 50% of btc measured in $$, unless the price react accordingly.
Therefore, the effect is the same, unless the number of minable tx (or their cost) dramatically increases.

As of this moment mining at a typical 10c/kwh is already unprofitable on S9 (Bitmain), but still somewhat profitable using newer equipment (M10). This is without even counting the equipment cost.

For the industrial sites with the electrical cost at 3-5c/kwh the breakeven would come once difficulty increases 2-3 times, which should be in 3-4 mo or so, maybe even earlier.



270. Post 46856844 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.09h):

Quote from: crypmike on October 14, 2018, 12:10:27 AM
Ethereum Hard Fork Test Goes Awry, “No Constantinople In 2018” Developer Says


https://ethereumworldnews.com/ethereum-hard-fork-test-goes-awry-no-constantinople-in-2018-developer-says/

Asness (see Bloomberg's article below):

“You can have a committee of 10 geniuses that proves collectively to be a moron.”

This is EXACTLY what I felt when eth honchos started to arbitrarily decide the economic parameters of ethereum. It can't end up well, eventually.

Bloomberg source "The Next Financial Crisis Is Staring Us in the Face"
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-10-08/the-next-financial-crisis-is-staring-us-in-the-face



271. Post 46882608 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.09h):

Quote from: Searing on October 14, 2018, 04:06:37 PM

my dreams, when I made this bet! (alas, gone along with my supermodel trophy wife goal at 100k BTC...alas) Sad

at 100K, 'trophy wife' coefficient is probably 1K btc, no less.
Alas, I might have been overestimating associated expenses.



272. Post 46884597 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.09h):

Quote from: kirreev070 on October 14, 2018, 05:04:06 PM

So has there been a analysis of that dump? Looked like a liquidity check right? I find the Monero dump coinciding with it telling somehow but not exactly sure in what fashion. Feels like a Crypto attack.


I saw last week information about dump in different telegrams chat. But there almost always everyone wants to dump.


Quote
Looked like a liquidity check right?

And I found an interesting chart.




This chart makes no sense. There are no wallets holding 1 mil BTC.
https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html

Do they mean $1 mil in btc?



273. Post 46953724 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.09h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on October 16, 2018, 10:48:39 AM
confirmed



Baby Face Winston with fully automatic, noice.




274. Post 46965596 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.09h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on October 16, 2018, 10:54:45 PM
Are we still not rich?

You OWN btc’ssssss..... your rich Grin

True that.
17 mil coins (mined so far), say, 4 mil lost, 13 mil possible (for now, up to 17mil once all are mined).
Each HNWI (millionaire in investable assets, not counting the primary residence) may have only 1.1btc or so, on average (since there are 12mil HNWI in the world, apparently).



275. Post 47087948 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.10h):

Quote from: kurious on October 20, 2018, 12:40:08 PM
Evidence to confirm Bitcoin's low correlation to other asset classes at least until the beginning of 2017:

https://www.signalplot.com/what-is-bitcoins-correlation-with-other-financial-assets/

I hope it does stay that way, too - the fresh money which will pour in on the next hike will largely be institutional.  For institutional capital, a lack of correlation is the real appeal. I have that from a Hedge fund manager (macro trader) I know who told me how they see things.  The institutional investment industry is watching, salivating and waiting for a safe way in, via ETFs etc. thinking: 'Wow a whole new asset class that doesn't correlate to play with!' For them, it's a unicorn.

OK, huge institutional money actually directly in the market is a double edged sword - however, I doubt crypto can build to the new heights largely on retail investors anymore. 

Once they are in (institutional investors), it would start to correlate, because they always buy and sell like lemmings (true for >95% of them).



276. Post 47526042 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on November 02, 2018, 09:04:57 AM
In other worlds, CZ
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/9tewfh/binance_signs_up_40000_crypto_traders_in_its/ ...First Week in Uganda

just for kicks, see "Time traveler" report/retort.
not my opinion, but quite curios...mentions africa specifically.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1lfobc/i_am_a_timetraveler_from_the_future_here_to_beg/
Something like a dystopia, which can teach us something, but what?
No disrespect, but bitcoin in Africa/Uganda would not result in anything good long term, IMHO.

Would Blockchain space in Nevada become a "Citadel"?
Or, maybe, Malta would have first dibs since it is in a nicer environment?



277. Post 47527418 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: jbreher on November 02, 2018, 06:26:05 PM

Yeah but...

They show a balance of about $1.8B, while Tether market cap (according to CMC) is about $2.5B.

For some reason, this does nothing to assuage my skepticism.

Market cap is 1.768 bil according to CMC (checked just now).
2.5 bil is what they CAN issue, but only 1.768 bil is issued, presumably after they "burned' 0.5B in tokens recently (probably to get to the balance).



278. Post 47527571 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: kenzawak on November 02, 2018, 06:47:23 PM
Can someone make Arthur Hayes shut up ?

https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-price-bitmex-ceo-doubles-down-on-bear-call-says-btc-could-fall-to-2000/

Quote
CCN reported earlier this week that Hayes, a former Citigroup trader, is now predicting that the bitcoin downtrend could last another 18 months, mirroring the “nuclear bear market” the crypto industry experienced in 2014 and 2015. Writing in Friday’s edition of the BitMEX Crypto Trader Digest, Hayes doubled down on that portentous outlook.

How the does he know that?
Trace Mayer was saying that market would go to 28K, it went to 20K and stopped cold.
Now Trace is saying that 3.5K is possible, however, maybe it's already done it's bear cycle (mostly).

Nobody knows what the market would do, and if they do, ostensibly, they are not going to tell us.

Is 2k possible. maybe, but is it likely-f, NO.



279. Post 47533932 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 02, 2018, 11:35:46 PM
Can someone make Arthur Hayes shut up ?

https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-price-bitmex-ceo-doubles-down-on-bear-call-says-btc-could-fall-to-2000/

Quote
CCN reported earlier this week that Hayes, a former Citigroup trader, is now predicting that the bitcoin downtrend could last another 18 months, mirroring the “nuclear bear market” the crypto industry experienced in 2014 and 2015. Writing in Friday’s edition of the BitMEX Crypto Trader Digest, Hayes doubled down on that portentous outlook.

How the does he know that?
Trace Mayer was saying that market would go to 28K, it went to 20K and stopped cold.
Now Trace is saying that 3.5K is possible, however, maybe it's already done it's bear cycle (mostly).

Nobody knows what the market would do, and if they do, ostensibly, they are not going to tell us.

Is 2k possible. maybe, but is it likely-f, NO.

From where are you getting the Trace Mayer assertion of $3.5k is possible?  Is that a recent statement, and what is the context of such statement? 

As you have already astutely asserted, I think that both of us have recognized that there is a decent difference in the picture that might be portrayed between purporting that some BTC price movement is "possible" and ascribing "likelihood" to that same BTC price movement.

Trace...where?
here (my bad, not 3.5, but rather 3K):
https://twitter.com/TraceMayer?lang=en

he is wrong, IMHO.



280. Post 47563293 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

There are no known life extension technologies (so far).
The most promising tech currently would be senolytics, but preliminary data show that the result would be longer "healthspan", but not an extended lifespan.
Eventually, we might be able to upload ourself into some substrate, but it might not be characterized as a life extension, but some kind of "presence", perhaps.
I am not sure that this would even be desirable from an uploadee perspective.
I can see that it could be good for relatives for 'closure', perhaps.



281. Post 47589146 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on November 04, 2018, 06:03:55 PM
Hmm. Curious how my node daily activity is following price movements today.





hmm, i don't see much of a price difference on CMC.

EDIT: haha CMC poops out
altcoins are having an uptick, which is probably correlated with another fork in prior bitcoin fork.



282. Post 47657427 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Quote from: infofront on November 06, 2018, 08:02:34 PM


Nice.
I had quite similar idea expressed here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg44213157#msg44213157



283. Post 47663073 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.11h):

Perhaps, mic plays his cards just right...

"The Nomad Passport Index, meanwhile, ranks 199 citizenships on five factors: visa-free travel, international taxation, perception, dual citizenship and personal freedom.
According to its 2017 list, the most desirable passports come from Sweden, followed by Belgium."

Hmmm.
At some point..in 2020-2025, many here might be interested in broadening their geographical "horizons".
I just want to travel from one reasonably moderate climate to another with plenty of water spaces around.



284. Post 47723576 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

Quote from: Elwar on November 09, 2018, 01:16:28 AM
Just remember...when selling you get hit with tax consequences (in the US).

So selling a big chunk is not the best strategy (unless you're just in it for the fiat and supporting your benevolent government with more money).

Personally I was able to retire and I can pull out $35k of my bitcoin every year tax free. I don't have to work the rest of my life.

To me that seemed a bit more important than anything I could cash out and buy.

Good for you, although it all depends on your physical location.
In most US urban/suburban areas $35K is somewhere in the vicinity of barely scraping by, but not exactly poor, and I am not even talking about NY, LA, etc.
I am also aware that in some other areas on Earth $35K/year would be a very nice living or close to it.



285. Post 47783665 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

No matter how brilliant the initial paper (founder) was, the nature of humans is to bring everything to the lowest common denominator aka shitola in due course.



286. Post 47899171 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

Here is my theory:

It was caused by the massive hat accumulation on WO, which caused the chart to literally break down.

/tic



287. Post 47899428 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.12h):

Trace Mayer was vocalizing $3500 a few weeks ago.
I would hate it, but it is probably possible as an ultimate low.
Maybe this is what whales like him want.



288. Post 48049521 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.13h):

Quote from: Febo on November 19, 2018, 05:17:59 PM
Right now is pretty clear that recovery cant start before mid 2019. v

really? It does not make much sense considering bakkt (physically settled futures) and ETF.
Typically, ETF would be the beginning of a new bull (as in gold).

Well, if ETF is not approved by Feb, then maybe mid 2019 makes sense, otherwise, NO.

To me, btc (as a new, better version of gold) was always a hedge to the hyperinflation possibility.
It still is.



289. Post 48085883 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.14h):

Quote from: Febo on November 20, 2018, 10:17:32 PM
Found this chart on reddit. Quite possible timeline. With nice bottom. Bear trap next summer then BAM. Two years of fun.




Nice graph, but it is just a projection of the 2013-2015 onto 2018 bear market.
I doubt that it would repeat itself.
The "Decreasing bounce" model suggests that we painted the bottom at $4000-4300.
See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg44213157#msg44213157
I will reiterate the model here:

Two previous large bears were 93-94%, then 86%, accordingly we should have less  this time around (less downturn then prior). If we decline more than 85.9%, then this model is invalidated.
I initially favored 78% decline=$4350 (violated on the intraday basis, but we will see the "close" at US midnight), but anything between 78 and 85.9% would still fit.
This model would be invalidated if we stay below $2800, otherwise we are still in it.
The average price between $4350 and 2800 is $3575.

Interestingly, we can also examine bounces:
The first peak was at $32, then decline to $2, bounce to $1160, decline to $150, and bounce to $19873.
Therefore, the first bounce ($2 to $1160) was 57900%
The second bounce was smaller in % ($150 to $19873)= 13100% (X0.226 of the first in %%).

Therefore, if we would bottom at around $4000, then this model predicts the next peak at or less than 2963% higher than $4000 or $122500.
At the lowest possible bound decline of the model ($2800), the next peak would be projected similarly 2963% higher than $2800 or about $85700.





290. Post 48087329 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.14h):

For those not very familiar with mining costs, here is an excellent write up from an expert.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063475.msg48085010#msg48085010

In US, typical (not in Cali) residential price is around 10c/kwh.

TL;DR

10c/kwh breakeven mining at $6414/btc
7c/kwh breakeven mining at $4489/btc
5c/kwh breakeven mining at $3207/btc...mostly industrial sites have this cost, unless you are living close to a hydro dam where some residents could have this and even lower.



291. Post 48087396 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.14h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on November 21, 2018, 01:27:13 AM
For those not very familiar with mining costs, here is an excellent write up from an expert.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063475.msg48085010#msg48085010

In US, typical (not in Cali) residential price is around 10c/kwh.

TL;DR

10c/kwh breakeven mining at $6414/btc
7c/kwh breakeven mining at $4489/btc
5c/kwh breakeven mining at $3207/btc...motsly industrial site have this cost, unless you are living close to a hydro dam.

Doesn't Canada have 7c and less for residents with fluid pricing contracts?

Perhaps, typically Canada has lower electricity price than US, hence a lot of btc miners there.



292. Post 48114725 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.14h):

Below is a link to one of those useless comparison charts with an optimistic tone Wink

AAPL in 2001-2003:
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/advchart/frames/frames.asp?show=&insttype=Stock&symb=AAPL&x=25&y=19&time=100&startdate=12%2F4%2F2001&enddate=11%2F4%2F2003&freq=1&compidx=aaaaa%3A0&comptemptext=&comp=none&ma=0&maval=9&uf=0&lf=1&lf2=0&lf3=0&type=2&style=320&size=2&timeFrameToggle=false&compareToToggle=false&indicatorsToggle=false&chartStyleToggle=false&state=8

to focus on a drawdown after flat:

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/advchart/frames/frames.asp?show=&insttype=Stock&symb=AAPL&time=100&startdate=3%2F24%2F2003&enddate=5%2F24%2F2003&freq=1&compidx=aaaaa%3A0&comptemptext=&comp=none&ma=0&maval=9&uf=0&lf=1&lf2=0&lf3=0&type=2&style=320&size=2&x=12&y=4&timeFrameToggle=false&compareToToggle=false&indicatorsToggle=false&chartStyleToggle=false&state=8

Sharp down, then flat, then sharp down just before turning around and going from split adjusted $0.9 to $230 in the next 15 years.
If $6500 was our flat and $4035 was our sharp down, then, perhaps, blue skies straight ahead.

To overlay fundamentals on a chart: in 2003, Wall street knew that Apple is about to introduce iTunes (since Apple was negotiating licenses).
They pushed the stock down under false rumors that Apple would bid for Disney, which was, of course, bogus (watch that volume when false rumors spread).
It gave them a 10-15% discount.

Back to Nov 2018, lots of negative info was actively planted in the last couple of weeks while someone got $1bil of btc accumulated in a new wallet (posted on interwebs somewhere).
I would not be surprised if someone was seeking similar (or higher) discount before turning around and pushing btc upward HARD.



293. Post 48115722 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.14h):

Meanwhile, if someone (who is not an employer themselves) is not considering bitcoin, they are finished going forward.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-end-of-employees-1486050443

The end of employees.
Job security-gone, especially benefits.
A lot of hassle for a low pay for most.



294. Post 48138298 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.14h):

Quote from: mindrust on November 22, 2018, 01:18:28 PM
Has everybody started buying AGAIN now?

I bought pretty much all of my coins in 2014 & am still HODLING most of them now. I decided to stop buying when we went back to $1000 after the Gox crash. Seeing that we reached $19,xxx last year though makes me think these are cheap coins atm.

I bought some the other day & am thinking about buying again today.

So who’s buying now or are you waiting to go lower still?

I am buying with both hands. Bought $1000 this month only. My total investment till now is $15k.

But on that Total investment also few very cheap coins involved?
Like under 1k ?

Must be your here for a long time already.....

My average is $3.3k

Bought most of them after $5-6k :/ FOMO got me so bad.

It is easier to trade or use recently purchased bitcoin (at least in US).
With older, cheaper btc, there are two "problems":
1. Every time you use it, you would have to calculate your return, then pay taxes in april (or even quarterly if your profit is high). In other words, each sell is a trade.
2. The darned forks. unless you want to leave money on the sidewalk, you would have to to make a new wallet for any fork you want to redeem. Not unsurmountable problem, but very annoying.



295. Post 48146894 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.14h):

Quote from: gentlemand on November 23, 2018, 12:01:58 AM
So if we're set for a repeat of the last cycle and the next two years consist of not very much followed by some jizz in 2021, how will you take it? What will you get up to? Will it break you? Will you double down? Will you steal a yacht and sail away? Are you already all set?

Me, I think I'm going to be rather annoyed by it all. Not sure I'm in the mood for more interminable nothing but it's certainly looking like it's on the menu. I may pass the time unicycling down every road in my county which is about 15,000 miles. I can't ride a unicycle.

Nah, it can't work like this (2 year).
The math says that it can't (miners profitability has to be above zero in POW).
After about 3-6 mo, it is either an uptrend or a crash to essentially nothingness.
My preference is the former, of course.



296. Post 48166547 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.14h):

Quote from: Butterscotch Cartman on November 23, 2018, 06:32:46 PM
My connection says 2000-2500 range by the end of this year.  There are still some idiot holders that will hold till zero when this joke currency collapses but some of you may be saved if you do the right thing.



tick tock, tick tock,  there is not much time. Don't wait too long to sell.

Your connection? What a pile...
You think that your posting this would entice anybody here to sell to you?
It's laughable, man.



297. Post 48168854 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.14h):

Quote from: Searing on November 23, 2018, 08:14:24 PM
I see it hitting 3k when the SEC denies the ETF's and probably revisiting 3k when mt gox dumps all the coin in Feb/March 2019 at which time I'm fairly sure

the US will be in a recession...the whole store of value of crypto will not be working too well with the above either to keep prices up .it is gonna suck


this is gonna take a bit

hope I'm wrong...but.....

brad


Well, it is all possible, albeit pessimistic.
However, one thing is for sure:

PTB better pray that bitcoin succeeds, otherwise they will end up with nothing and the new Dark Ages.
The 247 trillion and counting debt pile cannot possibly be tamed, that's a given.
I am about to restart DCA.



298. Post 48169662 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: yefi on November 23, 2018, 08:37:11 PM
I would like to ask a question to the long term hodlers governing this thread, the ones with the hat: How down do you think the btc/usd price can go before next ATH?

If we assume the 2014 scenario, then 2700 would be the absolute bottom with consolidation in the 3000s before the next rally. We also have the formidable weekly 200 SMA around 3200.

It doesn't portend well, however, that we're down more than at this same point in the 2014 cycle: -80% vs. -77%.

Not sure what do you mean by the "same point". In time?
Overall 2013-2015 decline was 1160 (bitstamp) to 171 (coinmarketcap data) or 85%.

So far, this cycle it is 19873 to 4035 (lowest), which is about 80% (79.7%).
Right now, it is 78.8% (still much lower than 85% in 2013-2015).



299. Post 48171770 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Food is being destroyed.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-grains/harvesting-in-a-trade-war-u-s-crops-rot-as-storage-costs-soar-idUSKCN1NQ0GA

Quote
Fontenot plowed under 1,000 of his 1,700 soybean acres this fall, chopping plants into the dirt instead of harvesting more than $300,000 worth of beans.


This is so 1930ies, apart from us being in Depression (so far).



300. Post 48201072 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

I would like to hear any "fundamentals" story behind $6500 to $3700 move.
It seems to go up when you think it might crash (Aug 2017) and it crashes when you think that it should go up.
At this point, it is all unknowable unknowns.



301. Post 48201167 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: YourMother on November 25, 2018, 02:44:41 AM

Far from mission accomplished? Almost 50% crash in less than 2 weeks is not a capitulation? Come on, this crash was even more aggressive than the 2015 one.



Edit: For all the pigs that are in FIAT right now, stop being greedy! You got the price you dreamed of back when it was over $10k. The fact that it even got to this price in the first place is fucking crazy to me. I understand the 2015 capitulation since it was all about MtGox, Bitcoin in its infancy and everyone calling it a scam and ponzi scheme, but now ? This shit is just straight retarded.

According to this, one can go long at between now and whatever low next 24-48 hr would bring and expect a short term bounce to 6500-7000.
Possibly, great money to be made, but I pass on a leveraged play.
I did re-start DCA at 4300. Too early, I know, hence the DCA.



302. Post 48201365 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on November 25, 2018, 03:19:43 AM
According to this, one can go long at between now and whatever low next 24-48 hr would bring and expect a short term bounce to 6500-7000.

It is very hard to quickly turn around an aircraft carrier sailing at 30 knots.  Not impossible but very hard.  

not making that trade en masse, but someone will.
will probably buy a bit soon, though.



303. Post 48201409 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: Searing on November 25, 2018, 03:29:44 AM
I've been seeing quite a few people calling for triple digits. Just like the last bear market, when half of people were calling for double digits.
Meet the new bears. Same as the old bears.

I have been waiting for two years to retest $1166.  Even I don't think we will get there. 

well my view is asic mining if only the altcoins is dead...if 2 groups can simply toss $$$ around at a loss for power games with bch and btc and tank all the altcoins

hard do see how mining is gonna work out with all those coin and not a lot of adoption or volume...the point eventually could be made for btc mining as well..but not yet

what a sh*tstorm

brad


the current conundrum does bring problems in POW coins (short term), but POS or premine stuff tanks just as well or more.



304. Post 48201490 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on November 25, 2018, 03:34:01 AM
What bothers me is we are getting well ahead of schedule.   We shouldn't be into $3k before January.  

We are doing it ahead of schedule because it had to be done before Bakkt and ETF are operational. Nobody on WS opens up a brand new venue during the shitstorm.

Notice how neatly GBTC started trading just as the bear was on the last legs in 2015 and just as it started, there was the last good pulldown before the train left the station for a 2015-2017 run up.



305. Post 48201830 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Check this out:

https://steemit.com/mrrobot/@titusfrost/mr-robot-s-ecoin-v-s-bitcoin

Does life imitate fiction or life (after being informed by fiction) adapts in strange ways?





306. Post 48202317 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: gembitz on November 25, 2018, 04:32:02 AM
below 3638

a lot of coins being bought here though

$2500 test soon...! Wink weee

i swear i should just get inet ..sell all my crap ..get a tiny house and become a minmialist...with all the BCH games and low volume on BTC etc

I swear the bankers are gonna say 'you need adults running this...use ripple' and we will be cut off a the knees...

FML

brad


$2500 true test then i'll decide if to buy back@$1337? :-D weee

@1337-I guess it is where you sold, right?



307. Post 48202597 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on November 25, 2018, 04:47:12 AM
If it drops to $2k I’m going to sell everything I own to buy btc.

Well, with btc at 2K Van Ecks ETF would be only $50K/share.
also, i think at bakkt the minimal purchase is 10 btc equivalent, so $20K.



308. Post 48203069 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on November 25, 2018, 05:09:59 AM
If it drops to $2k I’m going to sell everything I own to buy btc.

Well, with btc at 2K Van Ecks ETF would be only $50K/share.
also, i think at bakkt the minimal purchase is 10 btc equivalent, so $20K.

Not liquid enough for me and requires a level of trust. A nice cold wallet stuffed with coin will do the trick.

I hear you, but there is a question of using IRA funds.
I can use some currently unneeded IRA funds (maybe in 5%-10% area) to buy into ETF and/or Bakkt (that would be settled daily into physical btc).
I don't want to buy any more stocks or bonds, lol.



309. Post 48204595 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: CoinCube on November 25, 2018, 06:45:29 AM
Prenups are worthless, and you can't trust numbers like that. But even if this particular number is true, you still need to ask the question "compared to what?". The odds of a fresh marriage today surviving for ten years, in the form of an intact marriage, is about 3%. So with your religious reduction, that still leaves us over the 50% mark. You have better odds betting everything you own at the casino. Literally. And I use literally in the correct way here.

Disagree about the numbers part.
Risks can be dramatically reduced far beyond 50%.

You just have to choose your spouse wisely when selecting a partner.
Check out these divorce statistics they vary dramatically based on several factors.

https://www.wf-lawyers.com/divorce-statistics-and-facts/


U.S. DIVORCE RATE BY OCCUPATION

Professions with highest divorce rate:
*       Dancers – 43
*       Bartender s- 38.4
*       Massage Therapists – 38.2
*       Gaming Cage Workers – 34.6
*       Gaming Service Workers – 31.3
Professions with lowest divorce rate:
*       Farmers – 7.63
*       Podiatrists – 6.81
*       Clergy – 5.61
*       Optomitrists – 4.01
*       Agricultural Engineers – 1.78


Among the population segments with the lowest likelihood of having been divorced subsequent to marriage are Catholics (28 percent), evangelicals (26 percent),
upscale adults (adults making more than $75000 annually) (22 percent), Asians (20 percent) and those who deem themselves to be conservative on social and
political matters (28%).

Just group a bunch of low risk factors together.
For the absolutely lowest risk marry a conservative religious Asian girl who is highly educated.

Risk then is probably less then 20%.




Scientists 8-9% (why agricultural engineers don't divorce-this is astounding, maybe some data fluke)
Navy seals 90% (is this for real?)



310. Post 48230666 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

What/when is the daily 'closing" in bitcoin?



311. Post 48231045 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on November 26, 2018, 01:41:51 AM
What/when is the daily 'closing" in bitcoin?

Daily candles close at midnight UTC

Weekly candles close midnight Sunday night UTC

Yes, I was referring to the poll actually, which mentioned Nov 25 Closing while as @Toxic2040 rightfully noted, there is NO closing per se.
Midnight UTC is probably the best; albeit I seriously doubt that Coinbase and Gemini go by UTC, but they might be.

The rest of the group, thanks for funny responses...I liked 42.



312. Post 48231234 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on November 26, 2018, 02:12:20 AM
Well, I sold 13

Do you plan to purchase back in in the $2k's? Asking for a friend..

 That's a young man's game and Searing is retired.


Once you sold a largish chunk of bitcoin, it is difficult to buy it back, especially if you used the proceeds "to live".
Mining, maybe, but mining is close to being kaput (short term) at above 7c/kwh.



313. Post 48231370 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: smartcomet on November 26, 2018, 01:36:50 AM
https://twitter.com/MustStopMurad/status/1066776756756070405
Quote
A large chunk of people calling for "$1500" right here makes me think a bounce is in order.

We need to give FAUX-bears FALSE HOPE... give them a BULL TRAP which challenges local assumptions, *THEN* destroy them FULLY, crushing their spirits beyond recognition. Then we bottom.


Murad is wrong.

We are either done or close to it. Perhaps, we would retest and even violate, but there would be no sudden plunges, IMHO.
We just had one (from 6500 to 3456).

That said, maybe btc is one crazy nut and would want to exterminate 90% of positions. Then, who knows.



314. Post 48232186 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

A small distraction (OT) to btc pricing minutiae:

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612458/exclusive-chinese-scientists-are-creating-crispr-babies/

Quote
A daring effort is under way to create the first children whose DNA has been tailored using gene editing.

This would open a Pandora's box, most definitely.
All talk about current inequality is just about numbers that could be attained one way or another.
Not so simple if you are essentially MADE genetically different.
For maximum publicity they started with the gene that is accessory to HIV (CCR5).
No active CCR5 present, no HIV.
Will it stop there? Of course, not.



315. Post 48232849 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.15h):

Quote from: jojo69 on November 26, 2018, 04:07:41 AM
I say we just clone Bob over and over and make that our entire race.

It would be quite interesting undertaking to compare bitcoin hodlers/ mid-early investors (say, prior to 2015 or 16) to an average human population.
My expectation would be that there would be many interesting traits.
Something relating to risk taking (maybe even excessive risk), patience, stubbornness, etc.

As Jesse Livermore (or his alter ego) have said:

Quote
It never was my thinking that made the big money for me. It always was my sitting. Got that? My sitting tight! It is no trick at all to be right on the market. You always find lots of early bulls in bull markets and early bears in bear markets. I've known many men who were right at exactly the right time, and began buying or selling stocks when prices were at the very level which should show the greatest profit. And their experience invariably matched mine--that is, they made no real money out of it. Men who can both be right and sit tight are uncommon.



316. Post 48340379 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.17h):

Quote from: Paashaas on November 30, 2018, 04:50:45 AM
The Dutch East India Company was the largest company in history. Also the first company trading stocks at the Amsterdam stock exchange.

The company was as large as 20 of our largest companies combined, it was as large as the GDP of Germany and Japan together.

Amazing achievement from this tiny country.




I am sorry, but it makes no sense.

Dutch east india company profits were:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_East_India_Company
Quote
"the long-term average annual profit in the VOC's 1630–70 'Golden Age' was 2.1 million guilders, of which just under half was distributed as dividends and the remainder reinvested. The long-term average annual profit in the 'Expansion Age' (1680–1730) was 2.0 million guilders, of which three-quarters was distributed as dividend and one-quarter reinvested. In the earlier period, profits averaged 18 percent of total revenues; in the latter period, 10 percent. The annual return of invested capital in the earlier period stood at approximately 6 percent; in the latter period, 3.4 percent."

According to the following 1 guilder was either about $12-15 or $100 (or, maybe, fluctuated between these two with $12-15 being more reliable (later) number.
https://lensonleeuwenhoek.net/content/what-was-guilder-worth

Therefore, 2.1 mil guilders yearly profit is just $32-210 mil in CURRENT buying power.
NO way $32-210 mil in profit can get you ANYTHING close to trillions that you quoted, unless something is wrong with value calculation.
Besides, the population of earth was just 500mil back than. Not enough people to get to the valuation that high.

TL;DR this valuation is a MYTH.



317. Post 48357447 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.17h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on November 30, 2018, 08:11:42 PM
The bottom is not in.

This isn’t about price, it’s about time.  We haven’t had enough time to digest the last bull market.  

We will hit absolute bottom between here and mid-2019.  I can’t give you a price target because it’s not about price.  

Well, what this contention is based on, exactly?
There is no law that in bitcoin bear markets have to last the same time as bull markets (or longer).
In US stocks market, by comparison, bull markets typically last longer (in time) than bear markets (at least in the last 100-120 years).
I "digested" the last bull market just fine, so I vote for bull resumption earlier than mid 2019.

TL;DR Basically, this is just an opinion that is not based on anything else than your "gut". It could be right, but could be wrong just as well.



318. Post 48357663 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.17h):

Here is my attempt at btc bottoming fundamental analysis:

Bitcoin mining difficulty peaked on 9/30/2018, then went flat, now rapidly declining.
The last time this happened on a sustained basis was during Nov 2011 bottom.

In 2011 it took four months before market bottomed and decline in difficulty stopped (in correlation with the price rebound).
Counting from 9/30, we are already two months into difficulty decline period.
If total decline period is to last only four months, we would need to turn around (price-wise) within a month (or already) to get to the rise again by the end of four months period.
One may argue that it could last longer, but nobody knows what the result of such decline would be on system functioning. Yes, difficulty would slowly adjust downwards and relieve the pressure on miners, but it takes two weeks for adjustment, which might be too slow for some.

IF, on the other hand, you would continue both price and difficulty decline until mid 2019, bitcoin might be in jeopardy by the time it turns around there.




319. Post 48358691 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.17h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on November 30, 2018, 09:03:06 PM
Hint -- What drives the price of diamonds?

My first guess would be hats...a perfect correlation (to the downside: as hats increase on WO, the price of btc decrease world-wide).

Re hint...De Beers & Russia?



320. Post 48407080 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.17h):

Quote from: bitserve on December 02, 2018, 02:37:44 PM
FRESH FROM WANGA/MASTERLUC TELEGRAM:

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/JSP3KDmy-New-long-term-prediction-as-I-see-it-now/

Пoкpyтил нынчe шap и вoт чeгo вышлo = Twisted the ball now and that's what happened


-------

I don't know, but I think he is too optimistic in his timeline..... I mean, going to a bottom of 1500-3000 in less than a month and then the bear market is over?

Over 50K in less than two years?


What do you guys think?


He keeps misfiring lately...just one of those again.



321. Post 48407393 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.17h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 02, 2018, 04:10:05 PM
https://www.forbes.com/sites/katinastefanova/2018/11/28/the-trade-of-the-decade-betting-on-bitcoin/#3f1d2fc6458a

A solid piece, but why are we languishing at $4K, then?
From my perspective, bitcoin always does something least expected.

In the summer of 2017 I was afraid that a split would be very difficult to digest.
Instead, we moved from $1K almost straight to 20K.
I was expecting a correction, but I wasn't "really" waiting for a 83% plunge that is definitely NOT typical for $200 bil value assets, unless it is a commodity like sugar.

I expected smarter minds in finances (WS) picking up crypto because there is no other way out of the current economic predicament.
They got to realize this at some point.
However, lately, reading upon all horrible stories about environmental destruction (read on insect apocalypse, for example-it is all true as I have my own life observations confirming this OR testosterone levels reduction going on for several generations already), I start to think that maybe we, humans, set ourselves on some kind of a suicide path.

If that is the case, ignoring crypto (as a salvation) is EXACTLY what doomed societies are going to do.
Maybe a Great Filter (of Fermi's paradox fame) is not behind, but right in front of us.

Count me (at the moment) as disappointed.



322. Post 48407431 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.17h):

Quote from: gentlemand on December 02, 2018, 10:47:26 PM
He keps misfiring lately...just one of those again

Crypto dementia.

Just as crypto runs on accelerated time, one's brain is dragged along with it.

These days I soil myself daily as I no longer acknowledge my own winkle as part of my body so conventional urination by handling another man's phallus is too gay. I also have to live in an 80s themed community to maintain some grip on reality so my carers dress me like Debbie Gibson.

I sit drooling in a rah rah skirt much of the day.

Get yourself checked and get out while you can.

Huh? Would you mind saying it again, I don't hear very well on that ear.



323. Post 48433048 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.18h):

I wonder what is the estimated probability for a 100K party within 5 years from today (in regulars opinion).

IMHO, 10%. Granted, going into 2018 I thought that it is close to 80-90%.




324. Post 48433385 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.18h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on December 04, 2018, 04:01:04 AM
The odds of a party or the odds of $100k?!

LOL...if btc will be at $100K, a party will happen (99.99% probability in my guesstimate Wink)



325. Post 48434325 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.18h):

Quote from: Paashaas on December 04, 2018, 04:51:49 AM
I wonder what is the estimated probability for a 100K party within 5 years from today (in regulars opinion).

IMHO, 10%. Granted, going into 2018 I thought that it is close to 80-90%.



IMO $100k per coin will be reached within 5 years.

The road from $100k to $1m will be the same rollercoaster as going from $10k to $100k.

We haven't seen anything yet, consider Bitcoins enormous potential with only 21m ~18m coins.....(mindblowing numbers)

I'll pick up this argument even though I would like nothing more than 100k (or more).
Points:

1. Bitcoin is showing a propensity for too much volatility. It is OK for a $1bil asset to decline more than 80%, but it is different (inappropriate) for a $300-350bil asset. It should have shown a bit more maturity. It did not.
It is still barely hanging within respectable params, but below $2.8K (85-86% decline) all bets would be off.

2. Apart from lightning that is making good progress, what exactly is happening, technology wise? Last time I checked blockchain.com wallet has about 80-90% similarity to the 2014 version.

3. "They" did a job on us with the futures and now gloat about it. No matter, "they" will be the ones to miss more powerful bitcoin when their SHTF.

4. Nobody have a slightest idea where bitcoin is going price-wise and why. A gigantic gap in future valuation estimates (between nothing and 100tril) shows that the matter is not settled even after millions of people first learned of bitcoin in the fall of 2013.



326. Post 48455210 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.18h):

Not sure if this was already posted, please don't kill the messenger as i don't agree with lots of these points.
However, this shows where institutional investors (aka hedgies) are on this.

https://twitter.com/DoveyWan/status/1068573163670261760

In short: institutionals are shell-shocked and bewildered.
My take home message from this particular tweetstorm: small size institutional money will not participate from now on.

TL;DR she predicts that, similarly to how internet happened, blockchain will eat the world, but somehow traditional players (Fidelity, Paypal, etc) would be the winners and we would be the losers.
I disagree, obviously.



327. Post 48455313 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.18h):

Quote from: BotanicKilt on December 05, 2018, 01:30:56 AM


Man, that's ancient history already.



328. Post 48456131 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.18h):

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on December 05, 2018, 02:44:19 AM
In my opinion, there are very major fuck-ups on the horizon.

The Interest rate hikes will blow up everything. The whole system will collapse. Banks won't be able to provide cash. People will lose all their savings in banks.

If they don't raise the rates, It will be hyperinflation then. The whole system will collapse anyway. This time asset prices will do full moon. GOLD= $10k. A loaf of potato = $50. People will die of starvation.

They can't pick their poison.

Banks will go poof!. People will panic. People will seek a mobile asset which they can spend easily which is also a store of value. That's not gold because it is not mobile.

We all know what it is.

BTC will be $100k, maybe even $250k but it will also bring a world war along with it. Then partying in Amsterdam won't look like a bright idea.   Grin

I hate to have merited this.  But its prescient imho.

I was actually looking for that post, thanks. They will stop hikes shortly if not already.
However, EU did not even make any hikes, they are still finishing QE.
Because of this, EU has NO room to cut.
I am not sure how much stimulation going deep negative will do.
If i have to choose btc at 4K OR btc at 100K+world war, my choice would clearly be the former.



329. Post 48456300 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.18h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on December 05, 2018, 03:06:26 AM
I still think it's best I formally bow-out of any planning for a $100k party, however. That will most certainly blow my OpSec, and not worth the risk.

I get the point, but you ought to reconsider (in time).
With this kind of stuff coming...it might be sublime:

https://phys.org/news/2018-12-graphene-potential-smart-textiles.html



330. Post 48478518 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.18h):

Quote from: empowering on December 06, 2018, 02:24:38 AM
My spidey senses are tingling

There is doom in the air.... and not just in Bitcoin/Cryptomarkets

Something wicked this way comes

This is something interesting (as a prediction), albeit probably on a longer time scale:

https://www.news.com.au/finance/markets/world-markets/mathematicians-claim-unprecedented-global-disaster-is-just-years-away/news-story/5351f779ce0cce6a48776e86fc15f7f0
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-11/thni-itf112218.php

Quote
The problem is that we do not know what or how something would have to affect the global market to prevent the impending collapse. One remedy may be, for example, the emerging markets of cryptocurrencies, but will they really become one? Nobody knows. It is not even certain whether, knowing about the changes that are necessary, it would be possible to introduce them in just a few years - and it does not look like we have a longer period at our disposal.

I most certainly have confirmation bias, but ^^ kind of rhymes with my thinking:
TPTB better be kind to the only escape pod they might have, which is bitcoin (within the next 10 years max).



331. Post 48479483 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.18h):

Trace thinks that this is being done in part to "kill" some naughty miner-producing entity. Guess, which one?
https://twitter.com/TraceMayer

Quote
Some #Bitcoin miners annoyed #HODLGANG so extermination & replacement with friendlier to @bitcoincoreorg.

Makes some sense to me.



332. Post 48536667 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on December 08, 2018, 03:59:55 PM

 Heightened sense of smell is the bane of my existence.  Some colognes and perfumes give me an instant headache.  Those so-called air fresheners are just fuckin killer for me - they are not fresh at all.  My wife refrains from wearing perfumes and I love her for that.


Some anatomy: the sense of smell is the only sense which is being transmitted directly to your brain cortex without going through thalamus (as all other senses).
Smell [sensation]goes straight up (no pre-processing).
Humans typically have 5-6 mil olfactory (smell) receptors while dogs have  220-300 millions.
Typically, we can't smell much (compare to dogs).

I have a rather bad (low) smell perception, but every time before I have a headache, I feel weird smells. It has been going on since I was in my twenties, so quite a while.

The greatest remedy against all annoying and persistent smell sensations is to put your nose into a jar of coffee and whiff a couple of times.
It works 100% and is used in perfume salons for a reset.



333. Post 48542358 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Quote from: infofront on December 08, 2018, 08:10:20 PM
I've been keeping my eye on GBTC, to put into my mine and my wife's IRAs. The premium is too fucking high still. The premium+maintenance fees need to be significantly less than the ~20% capital gains tax that I'd have to pay from selling/using "physical" bitcoin.

With the impending Bakkt launch, GBTC might look like trash in a couple months. I haven't been able to find much information on using Bakkt in IRAs or 401Ks though.

GBTC has a yearly fee of 2%, so you would lose that 20% in 10 years holding it in your IRA.
GBTC was a truly great buy in the fall of 2015 (and a great sell in December of 2017).
I was actually planning to buy some, but did not since I was expecting Winkelvoss ETFcoming "any minute now".
Oh, well.



334. Post 48542822 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

My Christmas wishes re bitcoin in 2019:

1. No ETF. Why? Because institutions are losers who don't care in the slightest about bitcoin as an idea. Same for retirees. Watch them scramble to alternative assets once their asses would be on the line due to the downturn.

2. No bakkt. Why? Because bakkt will manifest custodial holding, hypothecation, rehypothetication, same as gold. Garbage! We don't need it. We do not need custodial solution when blockchain is the most secure custodian EVER.

3. No bitmain. I hope that they piss off and/or go bankrupt.

4. Yes 10X, maybe even 100X growth of Lightning.

5. Yes to more people participating in bitcoin.

6. Yes to more self-organization of the bitcoin crowd. We need it to survive potential fiat calamities. Do I want gold? Nope.



335. Post 48543573 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Quote from: goldkingcoiner on December 09, 2018, 12:03:26 AM
The only thing worse than a nocoiner peasant is a nohatter peasant.

I wear a hat, but it is invisible (to most).



336. Post 48543582 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Quote from: alevlaslo on December 09, 2018, 12:02:33 AM


How one draws a line meaning anything on a chart that is clearly exponential (or close to it)?



337. Post 48543680 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on December 09, 2018, 12:07:24 AM

We never know what is good or bad, it is important to not place too much importance on the past or the future. Live in the present.

https://medium.com/@davidgallan/who-knows-what-s-good-or-bad-my-tedx-talk-transcript-8404344779ce

What an excellent story, thanks. Maybe it was not the experience of others, but I did feel a little iffy during our 10K-20K burst, maybe because I could not rationalize it.
I remember my thinking: is it good or is it bad (longer term)?
No doubt, such fast spurt possibly prevented me from cashing out a bit more.



338. Post 48545383 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on December 09, 2018, 03:21:00 AM
Anyone have a chart comparing 2014 bear market difficulty to present day?

I actually researched this.

Difficulty declined (on a sustained basis) only during 2011 bear market: from 7/31/2011 to 12/10/2011 or about 4 mo (plus 10 days).
The decline was about 42% and btc bottomed Nov 19 2011 at $2, which is 20 days before difficulty bottoming, so price was leading, as expected.
Difficulty did not decline (on a sustained basis) during 2014-2015 bear market.
Right now difficulty is flat or declining since 10/6 or about two months.
Does this predict that we might be 30-40 days from price bottom?
Maybe, but i wouldn't put my money on this.
BTW, we lost about 21% so far and next drop looks like 6-7%.

Sources:
https://www.blockchain.com/en/charts/difficulty?scale=1&timespan=all
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty



339. Post 48559705 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Quote from: nutildah on December 09, 2018, 12:12:57 PM
When moon?

Pretty sure we've been there 3 times already. Every time the line crosses the trendline* going upward, that's moon territory.



So, potentially, theoretically, $100,000 by 2021.

*exponential trendline. And I realize nothing goes up exponentially forever.

NIce! Yes, people were following it on the BETI thread.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=470453.0

We were supra-exponential for a bit last fall, now below the trend as your graph rightly shows.
EDIT: Bobby Lee says $333K in DEC 2021. I will sell some at 200-300K to whoever would want a piece, lol.
Last time waiting for BETI 1.5 (it would have been 28-30K or so) did not work out. It would have happened if not for CME.



340. Post 48560237 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 09, 2018, 05:14:22 PM
via Imgflip Meme Generator

we need more of this and it is coming, hopefully.



341. Post 48560568 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.19h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 09, 2018, 05:20:00 PM
via Imgflip Meme Generator

Could this be a scenario lots of people experience @current time? Roll Eyes

He married a different babe?



342. Post 48589129 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 10, 2018, 10:06:29 PM




who thinks this way?

One thing that puzzles me is that upward burst continue to decrease (in %) very substantially from cycle to cycle so far (as the graph clearly indicates).
However, downturn drops seem to occur with roughly the same %%: 94, 86, now roughly 83-84%.
I am not sure what is the cause of this.

In fact, if this tumble would be even rougher  (at $2800 it would be about 86%), then next upswing better be HIGHER in %% than the last one, so, screw $160K, I am looking at 370K or above (from 2.8K)



343. Post 48609210 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 11, 2018, 09:30:41 PM
https://www.cryptomyths.net/



didn't try it yet myself .... gonna do it Smiley

Interesting, but some questions are very naive or strangely formulated.
Example: they don't know about the existence of Casascius coins, derp.



344. Post 48609665 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

if everything has to be balanced (like in a greek tragedy), then this plunge was inevitable.

Comparing with the previous bear (psychological portrait):
I nibbled until $300, then stopped, and btc went to $150 before reversing.
This time around, my last purchase was around $4200. Not planning any current buys.
If history (of my hesitation vs market) repeats itself, then the bottom would be at $2100.
Those who would be buying there (if it happens) would have the ballz of steel.



345. Post 48613424 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on December 12, 2018, 04:23:53 AM
If no one is buying how the fuck the price stay there? Manipulation?

I am serious (this time), no one here seems to be buying right now, much less the "regular" people, so... who is buying to support the price?

No matter what it 'seems', for every seller of a Bitcoin, there is a buyer of a Bitcoin. Sometimes, this fundamental principle seems to escape attention.

What I find most vexatious is how someone is only concerned about price manipulation when it is being held down and not when the price is rising.

Down = Manipulation

Up = Adoption/FOMO/Accumulation.

 Roll Eyes

Oh, that's easy to explain: because the majority is long, not short.
Shorting is psychologically hard for most people. It's the same on the stock market.



346. Post 48630386 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

There is a theme being propagated on interwebs that bitcoin will never be able to get from under negative price pressure from CME/CBOE futures (which are cash-settled). Apparently, it happened multiple times before with other commodities.

Q to WO crowd: do you think that bitcoin does (or doesn't) have some futures fighting mitigation strategy?

Personally, i don't fully buy that doom-and-gloom scenario because other cryptos did not have futures, yet declined even more, hence not a clear cut picture.

Would btc-settled futures like bakkt and/or 'physical' ETF objectively helpful in this fight or not?

Of course, if some some major fiat currency would experience hyperinflation, then btc would benefit, but this scenario is not very conducive to day-to-day life.

I would prefer to think about how we can use intrinsic bitcoin properties to fight CME/CBOE pushing us down (in price).



347. Post 48631736 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 12, 2018, 10:25:06 PM
There is a theme being propagated on interwebs that bitcoin will never be able to get from under negative price pressure from CME/CBOE futures (which are cash-settled). Apparently, it happened multiple times before with other commodities.

Q to WO crowd: do you think that bitcoin does (or doesn't) have some futures fighting mitigation strategy?

Personally, i don't fully buy that doom-and-gloom scenario because other cryptos did not have futures, yet declined even more, hence not a clear cut picture.

Would btc-settled futures like bakkt and/or 'physical' ETF objectively helpful in this fight or not?

Of course, if some some major fiat currency would experience hyperinflation, then btc would benefit, but this scenario is not very conducive to day-to-day life.

I would prefer to think about how we can use intrinsic bitcoin properties to fight CME/CBOE pushing us down (in price).


Seems to me that you have to buy BTC in order to sell them, so can be a question regarding how long these folks can continue to get BTC to sell to send the price down, even if settled in dollars , aren't the shorts going to get reckt as some point if people are not willing to sell their BTC and there is not enough BTC to fuel the various contracts that are settled in dollars?

Nope, you don't need to do anything with the underlying (bitcoin) in order to buy/sell futures, which settle in cash (not bitcoin).
Same occurs on the stock market where since 1987 PPT regularly buys S&P500 futures (during crashes) to bring the underlying S&P up.
They save the money this way, lol. It's $-efficient.



348. Post 48631771 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on December 12, 2018, 10:57:44 PM

Cool. Thanks.

$7900

wrong thread to give the $ number for the bakkt game.



349. Post 48647561 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: gentlemand on December 13, 2018, 04:19:29 PM
That's a very short bear you have there.

well, 2015 was a flat for almost 8mo (after Jan plunge).
I don't mind us transitioning to such a flat right here.
Re 500K, I just don't know.



350. Post 48655022 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Will Trace's proofofkeys affect anything one way or another?
I am curious and leaning toward participation.



351. Post 48669272 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 14, 2018, 06:31:22 PM
I don't see "normal" lab meat not becoming mainstream, but I wonder if people would remain put off from human meat if the biggest deterrent (killing humans) is removed.

It seems gross to me on a more emotional/impulsive level, but rationally speaking I don't see anything speaking against it.

Isn't cows eating cows theorized as the genesis of mad cow disease?

1. Lab meat could become mainstream (if it becomes cost-effective), but it would NOT be grown from human cells, but from cow, sheep, pig, etc. cells.

2. cow eating cow brains (through pulverized additions to their food supply) was the cause of mad cow disease. Prions (proteins implicated in mad cow and related diseases) are concentrating in neural tissue. Case in point: never eat brains of any species.



352. Post 48669337 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on December 14, 2018, 06:47:08 PM
Didn’t you say you’re all in if we get to $1,500.

95% of me thinks going to $1,500 would be fucking terrible
5% of me thinks I could buy whole bitcoin’s again quite easily

Would you?



353. Post 48677908 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: VB1001 on December 15, 2018, 08:48:06 AM
Instant PayPal withdrawals now available for all U.S. customers.



https://www.coinbase.com/12-days?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=12-days

https://blog.coinbase.com/instant-paypal-withdrawals-now-available-for-all-u-s-customers-58b2958a13aa

Currently, customers are only able to use PayPal to withdraw or sell, and transaction availability depends on region. Coinbase does not support the ability to purchase digital currency using your PayPal account.



Sorry, but who here cares? here is paypal and here is bitcoin. these two don't need to cross path.



354. Post 48677977 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.20h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on December 14, 2018, 10:52:01 PM
And look how my GF Made my travelcase, map with all the papers and where to go “haha, but how very sweet”
Just affraid that i would miss something i guess Roll Eyes
Every page hours flights marked etc .......

Dude. You need to put a ring on that finger of hers.

He is a 'genius' as BTC goes down he will see if it was for himself or the BTC Hoard Smiley


My gf of 10 years (we are early 30’s - got together young) is currently in the phase of telling me that I ruined ‘our lives by not selling when it was $19,000’.

As an counterargument and I know it won't work  Smiley, tell her about superdeterminism (concocted to evade Bell's theorem).
A very cool, yet unlikely to be correct concept.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdeterminism
"I did not sell because I was destined not to sell...bitcoin is a new manifest destiny, darling/sweetie, etc"

OT: I was reading on Bell's theorem, hence the connection.



355. Post 48693953 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on December 16, 2018, 05:20:15 AM
TA is the way that humans achieve consensus on price.  The price is an expression of solace in pattern matching, that is the only way short consensus can be achieved (fundamentals drive long term consensus - except long term TA takes into consideration fundamentals).  The fundamentals driving long term price are primarily the halvening cycles, which is a supply side constraint.  Supply gets restricted, selling pressure on the market from miners eases, price goes rocketing up.  Its really that simple.  The correlation with legacy to date has been so low as not be worth worrying about.

Sorry, most humans do not use TA to achieve consensus on price.
In fact, I posit that you cannot make really large amounts of money using TA (unless you are a computer, I suppose).
The only way I have seen examples of large money being made is by placing reasonably large bets (that are not portfolio crushing if they don't not work out, but extremely rewarding when they do work out) on less likely outcomes where you have some legally obtained informational advantage (say, you analyzed a particular situation from an angle that everybody else missed).
Example: Soros' bet against the pound, etc.

Personally, apart from btc, I am thinking of learning (or re-learning) how to short equities.
There will be lots and lots of opportunities to make money this way in the next 10-12 years.
Index funds are so dead in the water or worse going forward.

 



356. Post 48712996 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: alevlaslo on December 16, 2018, 07:57:08 PM


as long as it was inspired by anna kendrick Smiley above the chart...

Why would we take off vertically from here?
In any case, there should be some selling anywhere between 15-20K.



357. Post 48713015 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Say, you guys KNOW some good looking and open minded chicks, I gather.
I am a bit jealous.



358. Post 48729286 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Darned it.
I was hoping that the prolonged downturn would 'kill' stuff like eos, forks, etc. for good.

Tech advances usually bring only a few old players again for the ride in new bulls:
examples: AAPL, MSFT, who survived many cycles (PC/MAC, early Internet, late Internet/smartphone).
AMZN and EBAY are the survivors of the first internet bull that strived in the second one.

BTC: survived two boom-bust cycles already and is in tail end of the third, hopefully, ready to go into the fourth.
So, this is candidate #1.
However, who would be new dominants (like FB, GOOG)?
Maybe none?

Any candidates?
If there will be, then right now or soon would be the most profitable moment to invest.

I don't really like EOS, and hope it would not become one.
What about tezos, polkadot, blockstack and TON (telegram token)? Will chinese gov-sponsor NEO and/or TRX?

I am not going to sell any btc for those, but i can see myself possibly spending fiat on some of the aforementioned.



359. Post 48729784 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: toknormal on December 17, 2018, 12:25:22 AM
Looks like a lot of monero shitcoin shillers are in this thread as well. Guess they are too blind to see that shitcoin is dying a slow painful death, very low trading volume and it is already inflated by wash trading.  Barely anyone even cares about the privacy features either.  STICK WITH BITCOIN FUCK THE SHITCOINS

That is a very short sighted philosophy.

You should see them as complimentary. If crypto was an undiversified market with a bitcoin as a monopoly it'd be as dead as a doornail. There'd be no hedges, no sector-specialised entry points, a million "Nouriel Roubinis" waving goulish scare scenarious at you that could never be field tested and no subsidiary industry to "buffer" the capital transiting in and out of the  asset. Why is BTC not sitting at $500 right now ? Because it's being buttressed by Altcoin capital.

Altcoins probably attract far more value into bitcoin that what they take away. In fact many maximalists openly state that alts are "just a way to earn bitcoin" - hey ! they might be finally getting it.

P.S. Regarding Biodom's T/A above, I am of the "springback" view as well. Have been for a while due to the sharp correction we took shortly after the 20k peak. Given that there'd been a year of bubble building ( as opposed to 3 weeks like in 2013/14) I thought we over corrected. Add to that the Craig Wright "dumps" distorting everything, I wouldn't be surprised to see the "springback" scenario occuring.

sorry, that was alevlaslo's T/A, I just commented on it.



360. Post 48731368 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Here is an interesting opinion of Jim Rogers (which I completely disagree with, but i always like to listen to what opponents say):

https://youtu.be/tNSXWkApxU8?t=410

He basically says that if bitcoin/crypto would be successful, government can simply abolish it like England abolished scrip in the 30ies by making trading NOT in Bank of England notes (pounds) a TREASON.
Don't simply dismiss this, hopefully, wrong notion because he is an old fogie since this is Jim Rogers, again, who happens to know about commodity markets quite a bit.
He is not short, but not long either and acknowledges that he might be wrong in his skepticism.

I think that he is wrong because bitcoin provides a standard/reference point, is apolitical and not 'owned' by a particular government plus could accelerate the commerce in due course.
Being neutral would make it resistant to the moves that he described, unless there is cooperation among G20.
What do you guys think?



361. Post 48731473 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: bitserve on December 18, 2018, 01:19:50 AM
Here is an interesting opinion of Jim Rogers (which I completely disagree with, but i always like to listen to what opponents say):

https://youtu.be/tNSXWkApxU8?t=410

He basically says that if bitcoin/crypto would be successful, government can simply abolish it like England abolished scrip in the 30ies bymaking trading NOT in bank of england notes (pounds) a TREASON.
Don't simply dismiss this, hopefully, wrong notion, because he is an old fogie since this is Jim Rogers, again, who happens to know about commodity markets quite a bit.
He is not short, but not long either. Acknowledges that he might be wrong in his skepticism.

I think that he is wrong because bitcoin provides a standard/reference point, is apolitical and not 'owned' by a particular government plus could accelerate the commerce in due course.
Being neutral would make it resistant to the moves that he described, unless there is cooperation among G20.
What do you guys think?


Yes, it is perfectly "possible".

But... why would they? Bitcoin have some features that may even be good for them.

Also, before simply banning it, there are lots of intermediate steps:

- Specific taxes
- Mandatory report of Bitcoin holdings
- Whitelisting only on fiat ramps
- etc....

So, even IF any of that would happen it would take many years. I am not worried yet.

In 1933 FDR declared owning gold (inside the country) as being illegal.
Before that 40% of dollars had to be backed by gold. Afterwards, they did not have to be backed (for inside the country trade), but only in 1971 that gold-$ link was abolished for international settlements.

I am not worried too, but curious what will happen going forward when fiat debts would not be able to get paid.
How the reset would look like?



362. Post 48745932 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: infofront on December 18, 2018, 03:45:59 PM
If correct we should keep rising, slowly at first, but gaining speed and volume on the way out and see 6k  around Jan 12 2019. The cautious bull herd seems to be taking for granted they will get a nice long year to accumulate cheap coins like 2015 and then they can all be millionaires since they neglected to do this 4 years ago during the last great crypto winter, I dont think this will happen at all. Only 21 million(ok like 17 million) coins and its pretty pie in the sky for everyone to think they are gonna get 12 months of bargain basement prices where they can just casually collect coins for peanuts while fundamentals grow stronger by the day.

Ideal scenario (gently and slowly light up your hopium pipes for this one and take a big inhale)........

after regaining 6k in mid January, Bakt would then usher in another mini bubble to 40k followed by a quick and mild bear season testing 10k again, all before the next halving where the march to 250k starts Kiss

Ive been as bearish as the next guy. However, we should be given pause by the fact that everyone and his shoeshine boy are 100% certain that we're heading to $1,500-$2,500 and will endure 12+ months of crypto winter.

Yeah, I also call it a "reverse shoe-shine boy".
Bear market is probably finished when least likely participant is calling for it's continuation.
Case in point: marketwatch inverviewing a 13-year old "bear cub".
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/bitcoin-is-pretty-much-dead-says-teenage-crypto-phenom-2018-12-14



363. Post 48745983 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on December 18, 2018, 06:18:12 PM
I am thinking one of the differences during the next bull market is that there won't be no ICO craze as in this last one. That's surely a positive thing that will make everything much more sane. Not so good for ethereum though.

Btw, have ANY of the ICO's actually delivered anything useful or profitable already?
I wouldn't be so sure about that. It would probably at least be much more cut throat though, as most people should've realized that buzzword filled toilet whitepaper doesn't mean shit. That could also imply more absurd gains for those that do make the cut, with even steeper losses for full blown trash.

I intend to watch the newcomers closely.
In a bull market some will do very well. Hopefully, not EOS.
The point is to absorb the gains obtained in those into more btc (before they crash).



364. Post 48746570 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on December 18, 2018, 06:56:05 PM
Observation: While we have established there does not appear to be any discernible price correlation, between mempool size and BTC price, I did notice that the mempool has dramatically inflated over the last two hours.

https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#1,24h

Wormsign.

indeed...12-14 sat/byte to get "in" within 3 hr, >=33 sat/byte within 1 block.
Could be a temporary situation, though.
BTW, network hashing is increasing now, albeit difficulty adjustment would still be down by ~8-9% in a few hours.



365. Post 48746683 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: gentlemand on December 18, 2018, 07:05:09 PM
indeed...12-14 sat/byte to get "in" within 3 hr, >=33 sat/byte within 1 block.
Could be a temporary situation, though.

Has anyone charted the correlation if there is one?

I find it hard to believe volume dumpers would wait an hour or more to get on an exchange.

of course they won't wait, it just shows increased activity/competition for the blockspace.



366. Post 48747738 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on December 18, 2018, 08:02:24 PM
Not my chart.. but scary accurate in the past..



I wasnt ready to wait 5 years..  anyways.. just hodl

Worth noting we are already at the price that chart says is the bottom ($3k).  

it's funny that actual graph of this correction suggested a faster descent, yet he had drawn a shallower red and green lines (below the graph).

As HM said: we are there already (Dec 2018 instead of October 2019).
What now?
Perhaps, either straight up (10-30% probability) or a flat (70-90% probability).



367. Post 48747909 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Greenspan predicts stagflation in fiat world.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2018/12/18/alan-greenspan-stock-market.cnn-business/video/playlists/business-markets-investing/

What would be the consequences for bitcoin?
Last time it happened in the 70ies, gold performed exceptionally well, stocks did not do anything for 12 years (with multiple sharp drawdowns and recoveries) and bonds cratered.
Hopefully, btc would replace gold here.

At around 2028-2030, interest rates would be very high and, hopefully, the new bull market in bonds would begin.
I intend to capture that yield then and there.



368. Post 48748525 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on December 18, 2018, 09:15:34 PM
Greenspan predicts stagflation in fiat world.

https://qconline.com/business/investment/personal-finance/alan-greenspan-investors-should-prepare-for-the-worst/article_b5b32707-3764-562b-95e9-e1602618e663.html
https://www.cnn.com/videos/business/2018/12/18/alan-greenspan-stock-market.cnn-business/video/playlists/business-markets-investing/

What would be the consequences for bitcoin?
Last time it happened in the 70ies, gold performed exceptionally well, stocks did not do anything for 12 years (with multiple sharp drawdowns and recoveries) and bonds cratered.
Hopefully, btc would replace gold here.

At around 2028-2030, interest rates would be very high and, hopefully, the new bull market in bonds would begin.
I intend to capture that yield then and there.

"451: Unavailable due to legal reasons

We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time. For any issues, contact webmaster@qconline.com or call 309-764-4344."

Nice meme.

haha, just check the video.
I will remove the link to that nonsensical site, thanks.



369. Post 48748539 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 18, 2018, 09:00:27 PM


Well, I am close to 100% sure that the drawn curve does NOT properly fit the data points and is drawn without much respect to them (just to illustrate a point).
A much better curve (where you can examine whatever deviation from the mean your heart disire):
https://www.moonmath.win/



370. Post 48771313 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 20, 2018, 12:52:24 AM
via Imgflip Meme Generator



Just make sure your Trezor is genuine.
There was some fake Trezor selling which is not easy to distinguish.
proper trezor has some info re this.



371. Post 48772714 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: gentlemand on December 20, 2018, 02:16:30 AM
I have found the exact post/decision where I fucked it all badly at the ATH.

Yeah, stops are not foolproof but are better than nothing.

Should have listened TERA right there:

If Tera ever returns people should show due respect. Until he/she/it irritates enough people that they all start up sniping again.

You make no sense.

Tera was calling for prices to go down from $2k all the way up to $20k, so of course, she was going to be correct sooner or later.

Sure, she knew about various trading dynamics, but the extent to which you are suggesting that she is some kind of sorcerer, seems both unnecessary and even a mischaracterization regarding anyone's ability to foresee where the price is going to go.

Called it in 2013 too.

To me it all depends on how big the potential is.
I consider that bitcoin would be worth (in time) no less than $1 tril, maybe much more.
All ups and downs in AMZN and profit taking were WRONG moves until $1 tril valuation.
A simple hold was the only right move because no way one could have followed it's precipitous ups and downs.
I was shaken out of AAPL after the first 10X during bear market, consequently missed on another 10-20X.

I say that btc is worth 1 tril and will not trade until then.
IF btc would be thrown out (fail), then I took my risk and something else would have to pay the bills in eventuality.



372. Post 48789276 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: infofront on December 20, 2018, 07:47:46 PM
Are we starting to see people FOMO'ing?
Have no fucking idea. I am with my date tonight  and I am confused where should I concentrate more my btc or naked girl laying beside me.

Lets look at this mathematically:

0 BTC + 1 Naked Girl Now = 0 BTC + 1 Naked Girl Later (maybe)
X BTC + 0 Naked Girls Now = X/2 BTC + X² Naked Girls Later

The latter formula reduces itself to:

BTC=2XNG where X is the number of BTC now and NG is whatever it is.
perhaps second variable is needed.



373. Post 48789515 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: infofront on December 20, 2018, 08:01:52 PM
Are we starting to see people FOMO'ing?
Have no fucking idea. I am with my date tonight  and I am confused where should I concentrate more my btc or naked girl laying beside me.

Lets look at this mathematically:

0 BTC + 1 Naked Girl Now = 0 BTC + 1 Naked Girl Later (maybe)
X BTC + 0 Naked Girls Now = X/2 BTC + X² Naked Girls Later

The latter formula reduces itself to:

BTC=2XNG where X is the number of BTC now and NG is whatever it is.
perhaps second variable is needed.


You're right. We can make this a collaborative project.

ha ha, JK
Here:
NG=xe^[(btc price)/ai]
where i=(1.0+b)^y
x=number of btc
a-$ number needed to attract one ng (an independent variable  Grin).
i=inflation
b=yearly inflation (in decimals)
y= number of years passed



374. Post 48789845 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on December 20, 2018, 08:30:03 PM
Ack! Just looked at the price 1 hour ago...now it is going down...damn it....it's all on me...Ack!

(just don't look, it is always a trap!)

Something to say for 'blissful ignorance' and don't look at BTC price for 5 years, just think of all the angst I would have

lessened in the last 1/2 year alone!

Reminds me of back in 2015 when I got my first BTCs @ $230. I just forgot about them for 2-3 months, and then checked the price and it was $450.

I've never had a proper sleep since then.

My only regret is not buying GBTC in my IRA in the fall of 2015.
I don't recall why I didn't do it-most likely because of the premium with partial influence of possible Winkelvi ETF approval.
IRA would have removed any qualms about selling vs taxes.



375. Post 48789941 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: bitserve on December 20, 2018, 08:33:28 PM
Ack! Just looked at the price 1 hour ago...now it is going down...damn it....it's all on me...Ack!

(just don't look, it is always a trap!)

Something to say for 'blissful ignorance' and don't look at BTC price for 5 years, just think of all the angst I would have

lessened in the last 1/2 year alone!





Well, at least you don't REALLY need to look at the price anymore... You have been able to retire early. You have already cashed out enough to carry you until you receive your state retirement, social benefits, plus private pension plan. You still have a stash bigger than most guys here.

You made it FFS!

Just stop always seeing the glass half empty and enjoy your well deserved retirement, bro!

Retirement is severely overrated.
Most people are bored to smithereens and/or become idle.
In fact, being active in your 60ies probably extends life (for man).
I have seen older men declining really fast once they stopped working.
Somehow, this is not true for females, who often stay successfully retired for much longer.



376. Post 48790147 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: bitserve on December 20, 2018, 08:46:28 PM
Ack! Just looked at the price 1 hour ago...now it is going down...damn it....it's all on me...Ack!

(just don't look, it is always a trap!)

Something to say for 'blissful ignorance' and don't look at BTC price for 5 years, just think of all the angst I would have

lessened in the last 1/2 year alone!





Well, at least you don't REALLY need to look at the price anymore... You have been able to retire early. You have already cashed out enough to carry you until you receive your state retirement, social benefits, plus private pension plan. You still have a stash bigger than most guys here.

You made it FFS!

Just stop always seeing the glass half empty and enjoy your well deserved retirement, bro!

Retirement is severely overrated.
Most people are bored to smithereens and/or become idle.
In fact, being active in your 60ies probably extends life (for man).
I have seen older man declining really fast once they stopped working.
Somehow, this is not true for females, who often stay successfully retired for much longer.

Retirement for me would be reaching a point when I have assured my basic needs and expenses until the end of my life without the NEED of a "salary". That's my target. I may become even more active, that's not the point.

Well, I guess the right term would be "financial independence"? I donno.

Yeah, I get it.
It is just without work life is less structured.
Some people are obviously better than others in creating new things to do (away from work): new interests, hobbies, investment, etc., but others cannot do it as well or not at all.



377. Post 48790343 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Interesting statistic:

if you invested in Nasdaq stocks (as a group) at the peak of Internet in 2000, your average yearly returns since then would be 1.33% (much less than inflation).
Nasdaq return since 2000 peak is 28%, official inflation since then 46.4%
That's 19 years of almost nothing (and less than nothing in real terms).
Granted, you started with a bubble, but still, it's 19 years later....





378. Post 48790557 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: toknormal on December 20, 2018, 03:27:34 PM
Strange, did GDAX run out of BTC?  Sell side only showing 150BTC to over 7k USD.   Maybe it's the coinbase inside traders that have been dumping and now caught low on ammo.

Clearly, regardless of price, as time goes on more and more BTC goes out of circulation.

Eventually there will be no BTC left. Only bid side in (unlimited supply) USD. Divide by zero error means price will be infinity.

You will be able to buy the whole universe with just one BTC.


Well, there would be 10^500 -21000000 Universes still ready for the picking with progressively miniscule alts, I suppose.
Prices would decrease, I gather, so just wait until then (best prices)  Cheesy



379. Post 48790791 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 20, 2018, 09:35:58 PM
Last bear market was there talk along the lines of 'the bottom won't be in till all the altcoins are utterly rekt'?

I understand that you seem to be asking a rhetorical question, but I will answer anyhow, and that answer is:  No. 

So, it raises a decent point about whether such altcoin reckoning is a necessary condition precedent before BTC prices can rise or not?    Seems to me that the answer to my revised question is no, also, even though BTC price dynamics would likely be on stronger grounds for greater upwards movement with such shit coin shakening.... but also seems to wishful to hope for such to occur because the world does not tend to play out with such purism and clarity.   Shocked

This time around there would not be complete altcoin reckoning as long as there are funds with low cost basis in those as long as those funds have some positive fiat cash flows.
Some of those funds are highly concentrated in a particular alt (or a small group of them), hence they would defend their initial position(s).



380. Post 48791124 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.21h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on December 20, 2018, 10:03:30 PM
Also the largest transfer of crypto has happened apparently.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/coinbase-moves-5-billion-reports-largest-crypto-transfer-on-record


Those bastards got all that cash/crypto from all of us with their insane 1-1.5% fees.



381. Post 48797236 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.22h):

I did not know that middle class struggles in US are so profound.
Sad.

http://fortune.com/longform/shrinking-middle-class-state/

http://fortune.com/longform/shrinking-middle-class/

http://fortune.com/longform/shrinking-middle-class-math/

Hopefully, bitcoin would be an escape vehicle for some.



382. Post 48797531 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.22h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on December 21, 2018, 08:46:24 AM
There are less than 150,000 addresses with more than 10 BTC.

I think there’s probably less than 15,000 people in the world that have more than 10 BTC.

15K sounds like a lower bound.

I would say that 30-50K is more likely (each having 3-5 wallets of at least 10BTC).
Probably not more than 5K individuals with more than 100 BTC and not more than 500-800 with more than 1000BTC
https://medium.com/@BambouClub/are-you-in-the-bitcoin-1-a-new-model-of-the-distribution-of-bitcoin-wealth-6adb0d4a6a95

I am actually struck by the fact that there are only about 5K or so with more than 100BTC (16K wallets, but each person most likely has a few, so 3 seems to be a reasonable denominator).
In comparison, there are about 150K individuals with fiat wealth above $50mil (UHNW).
Source: credit suisse global wealth report (2018)



383. Post 48806980 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.22h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on December 21, 2018, 12:03:55 PM
There are less than 150,000 addresses with more than 10 BTC.

I think there’s probably less than 15,000 people in the world that have more than 10 BTC.

15K sounds like a lower bound.

I would say that 30-50K is more likely (each having 3-5 wallets of at least 10BTC).
Probably not more than 5K individuals with more than 100 BTC and not more than 500-800 with more than 1000BTC
https://medium.com/@BambouClub/are-you-in-the-bitcoin-1-a-new-model-of-the-distribution-of-bitcoin-wealth-6adb0d4a6a95

I am actually struck by the fact that there are only about 5K or so with more than 100BTC (16K wallets, but each person most likely has a few, so 3 seems to be a reasonable denominator).
In comparison, there are about 150K individuals with fiat wealth above $50mil (UHNW).
Source: credit suisse global wealth report (2018)

You misinterpret the Medium article you cite. It predicted 7500 people with a minimum of 215btc and 25000 wih at least 89btc.

Thanks for the link, interesting, although I expect some serious reshuffling since sep 2017 to have occurred.

Yes, 215BTC/7500people and 89BTC/25000people are the numbers that he projects, which could be correct or not since distribution of addresses between owners is not 100% clear.
Above was just my guesstimate based only on account numbers.
In the end, the number of individuals with 100BTC (5k) that I guesstimated is not that different from the authors' (less than 17.5 K, but more than 7K).
Perhaps the authors' numbers are more precise (depending on whether his guess on account vs individual proportion is correct).

The main point of my comment still stands: there are much less (by at least an order) 100BTC owners vs $50mil (UHNW fiat wealth) owners.



384. Post 48934243 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on December 28, 2018, 12:14:01 PM
bitcoin represents capital now, safe and secure
bitcoin sucks up all the capital it can find over the next few years
bolivares
pounds sterling lol
dollars
equities
bonds
pork bellies and metals
houses
commercial real estate
then we find the top, at a 1000x? a millionx?
the world divided into 21 million coins



I understand this argument (to a degree), but I am not sure what would be the impetus for such a transition?
5-10 years: I cannot see it providing that there is no massive debt default.
50-100 years: maybe, if the path is right.



385. Post 48934456 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Coinbase released some new account rules.
https://www.coinbase.com/legal/user_agreement?locale=en-US

Pledges not to hypothecate customers' btc.
Anybody noticed something new/important?



386. Post 48938442 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on December 28, 2018, 10:37:08 PM
Truly, it is the end of days.

Yes pensioners would be rekt.   But they get screwed anyway.


Very few people in US are getting (or will be getting) a pension.
Those who do, typically have a "bad" pension.
49% income coverage  vs 63% for OECD.
Just numbers:
http://www.oecd.org/publications/oecd-pensions-at-a-glance-19991363.htm

The "screw" part still applies.

I plan to work as long as I can, probably.



387. Post 48951396 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 29, 2018, 05:16:06 PM
L2 solutions are meant to take care of transaction costs, if/when they become unbearable. Which, in a world devoid of mempool spam by Bitmain and their minions, won't happen before massive adoption.

Massive adoption cannot happen -- LN cannot onboard more than the population of one small city per day, due to the anemic BTC block weight. How many millions will it take to reach 'massive adoption'? Multiple thousands.


First of all, ~200K/day is still more than ALL current btc users in just 6mo.
Second, there are/will be technical solutions as we progress.
Some (current) are less convenient, such as atomic swaps from LTC, but the possibility is there.
Lightning is very elegant and 'light' vs bloating up the blockchain, just look at Ethereum where many people already gave up syncing their nodes and rely on Infura (hence, centralization).





388. Post 48952138 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Perhaps, bitcoin is similar to the adaptive neural network.
It is not fully independent, of course, but there are similarities to two examples below.
Note the reflection on program simplicity as a key.
Maybe, the simplicity of bitcoin (vs ethereum) is a much larger advantage than previously thought.

Example #1
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/math/a25686417/amoeba-math/

Quote
So the amoeba can solve an NP-hard problem faster than any of our computer algorithms. How does this happen? The Keio scientists aren’t sure, exactly.

Example#2

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/26/science/chess-artificial-intelligence.html

Quote
It [AlphaZero] clearly displays a breed of intellect that humans have not seen before, and that we will be mulling over for a long time to come.

https://www.newyorker.com/science/elements/how-the-artificial-intelligence-program-alphazero-mastered-its-games

Quote
...the simpler its programs got—from AlphaGo to AlphaGo Zero to AlphaZero—the better they performed. “Maybe one of the principles that we’re after,” he said, in a talk in December of 2017, “is this idea that by doing less, by removing complexity from the algorithm, it enables us to become more general.” By removing the Go knowledge from their Go engine, they made a better Go engine—and, at the same time, an engine that could play shogi and chess.



389. Post 48954103 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 29, 2018, 08:36:08 PM
L2 solutions are meant to take care of transaction costs, if/when they become unbearable. Which, in a world devoid of mempool spam by Bitmain and their minions, won't happen before massive adoption.

Massive adoption cannot happen -- LN cannot onboard more than the population of one small city per day, due to the anemic BTC block weight. How many millions will it take to reach 'massive adoption'? Multiple thousands.


First of all, ~200K/day is still more than ALL current btc users in just 6mo.

I was responding directly to the 'massive adoption' challenge. Demonstrably, LN is incapable of onboarding 'massive adoption' due to the fact that the hard cap on blocksize is a hard cap on the number of people that can open a channel per unit time.

Quote
Second, there are/will be technical solutions as we progress.

We really don't need technical whizbangery when simple block size increase suffices.


I know that i am not going to change your mind about this, but, still...sometimes 'whizbangery' is needed.




390. Post 48954199 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: jojo69 on December 29, 2018, 06:50:17 PM

2) species loss ... ok maybe this is an issue, it's subjective and depends on your feelings though. Massive extinction events have happened regularly in the Earth's past from various means. How much species diversity is exactly the right amount? do you feel like playing god to determine that? humans have cultivated huge quantities of biomass in the form of crops, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, there are probably more animals alive on the planet today than at any time in the past, let's celebrate mammalian abundance husbanded by humans! ... are they just not the "right" animals for your liking? my liking? his liking? should we all be living in teepees and hunting the roaming meager herds of buffalo in competition with wolves and large cats? Who really knows what is the right balance for number of species and quantities of each species that should be alive on earth at any particular time? It's just an excessively complicated question to believe anyone who claims to know the answer, they are just bullshitting you to gain an advantage over you somehow.


Very much the crux of the matter as I see it.  Yes, as I have consistently maintained, my preference for the complex and diverse arrangement of forms out of which human intelligence arose is largely aesthetic.

You have demonstrated yourself not to be willfully ignorant.  You must understand that your preference for a subdued planet brought wholly under the reign of humanity is also aesthetic, a selfish and misguided aesthetic in my view but there it is.

I do not demand that you share my aesthetic values, though I will resist the conversion of wildness to commodity to the end.

We need natural habitats because it is where we, humans, will at some time spend all of our time in the absence of meaningful high intelligence requiring jobs.
With machines already on the verge of doing very complicated tasks much better than us and getting true insight into the nature of things (that they would be probably incapable of conveying back to us-see my other post), we would need nature more than ever.
Just one example: a machine is capable of reading X-rays 150 times faster than radiologist (making 250-300K/year) and giving a better diagnosis.
How you are going to compete with it? You can't, basically, unless you implement some luddite laws, but then you lose productivity.



391. Post 48954769 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Bitcoin babushkas...supplementing pensions with btc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=14&v=vBKwMQ1lkUk




392. Post 48956076 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: alevlaslo on December 29, 2018, 11:34:49 PM
If you do not give birth, aging and death will disappear

Spoken like a bot....

I start to suspect several posters not to be actual typing humans.



393. Post 48956101 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 30, 2018, 12:02:58 AM


I always wandered what exactly "bro down" meant there.
Like 'bro is down and out' or 'bro is down for some ka-ching!



394. Post 48956103 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 30, 2018, 12:04:47 AM
If you do not give birth, aging and death will disappear

Spoken like a bot....

I start to suspect several posters not to be actual typing humans.

i'm just an english writing forum bot  Cheesy  Undecided

not you, pal.
nooooo!



395. Post 48956135 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: alevlaslo on December 30, 2018, 12:07:14 AM
If you do not give birth, aging and death will disappear

Spoken like a bot....

I start to suspect several posters not to be actual typing humans.

I'm a Muscovite, I use a translator

no muscovite calls themself a muscovite.
but, how does it call himself/herself?
if answered in more than 30 sec...



396. Post 48956299 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: kurious on December 30, 2018, 12:29:15 AM
I think we are gradually destroying the plants, animals and environment we live in and I cannot respect anyone who considers it is not - at the very least... a problem.

We (as a whole) are probably doing just that, but what's the solution?
7 bil cannot eat natural food, albeit, one can do it if he/she has enough resources/money.



397. Post 48977518 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on December 31, 2018, 12:22:14 AM
So, with respect to the Proof of Keys, I split my transfer into a few separate requests and only two have been filled so far (3 hours have passed).  The others are still "pending" per my account page but there are no transaction ids showing and a search of the withdrawal addresses using a block explorer shows nothing happening.   Glad I started today... thanks again jbreher!


Well, Coinbase treats (internally) withdrawal as a sell.
I would rather do it after tomorrow if at all since accounting for it as FIFO would mess things up.



398. Post 48989232 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

On the last day of 2018 market showed btc a FU sign.

Honestly, I did not expect anything else from the old bugger...albeit, this is a year where I got a new job, so it all balances out in the drama called life.
Happy New Year!



399. Post 48989832 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on December 31, 2018, 11:42:19 PM
I’m with Peter on this. We might be close but it ain’t over.



https://twitter.com/peterlbrandt/status/1079738402180861953

1. "85% down... was not enough for Yueh"!

2. I am more eager to see his S&P500 chart for 2019: long, short or out altogether?



400. Post 48990100 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 01, 2019, 01:51:21 AM
What’s the best way to short the UK stock market in the event of a hard Brexit?

Perhaps, shorting the pound would be a better route/higher leverage.
I guess, you can short EWU in the states, but it was down 19% in 2018, so it could bounce here.



401. Post 48990301 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 01, 2019, 02:33:43 AM
What’s the best way to short the UK stock market in the event of a hard Brexit?

Perhaps, shorting the pound would be a better route/higher leverage.
I guess, you can short EWU in the states, but it was down 19% in 2018, so it could bounce here.
Can you short fiat currencies and not just ETFs? I didn't know you could short currency alone, if so that could useful for failing countries, I mean who wouldn't short the bolivar?

I think you would struggle to get anyone to take the long side of the trade

not at all, GBP recently rallied from around 1.25 to 1.27/USD.
If i were to do it, chart suggests 1.30 with a tight stop.

Quote from: kingcolex on January 01, 2019, 02:18:05 AM
What’s the best way to short the UK stock market in the event of a hard Brexit?

Perhaps, shorting the pound would be a better route/higher leverage.
I guess, you can short EWU in the states, but it was down 19% in 2018, so it could bounce here.
Can you short fiat currencies and not just ETFs? I didn't know you could short currency alone, if so that could useful for failing countries, I mean who wouldn't short the bolivar?


Of course, on Forex, with up to 50X leverage.
Perhaps, goldcoinminer would get into that trade, Wink.
EDIT: sorry, i misunderstood...you were talking about that hyper-inflationary currency. In that case, yes, i also don't see someone taking a long position.



402. Post 48990498 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: lightfoot on January 01, 2019, 03:31:21 AM
Why is it that most interns eaten by lions are hot young girls?

most likely because most interns are hot young girls  Grin.



403. Post 48990778 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: lightfoot on January 01, 2019, 04:07:50 AM
Why is it that most interns eaten by lions are hot young girls?
Come to any of the Southern states and you will fine a majority of the girls just as attractive, have fun but warning they are extremely conservative mixed with sluts.
Married one. They're weird, you need to know the difference between a hissy fit and a conniption fit.

go on...

Albeit, if someone throws you a conniption fit on NY eve, I just don't know.
Perhaps, she suddenly discovered how much money you are probably down for the year?
My gal sometimes tells me: you promised to sell some at 10K and you didn't.
(I actually did sell at around 10K in jan, but much less than "promised").
No big deal.

NY/times square just reported in (In rainy conditions).




404. Post 48991412 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.23h):

Quote from: kingcolex on January 01, 2019, 06:22:48 AM
Why is it that most interns eaten by lions are hot young girls?
Come to any of the Southern states and you will fine a majority of the girls just as attractive, have fun but warning they are extremely conservative mixed with sluts.
Married one. They're weird, you need to know the difference between a hissy fit and a conniption fit.

go on...

Albeit, if someone throws you a conniption fit on NY eve, I just don't know.
Perhaps, she suddenly discovered how much money you are probably down for the year?
My gal sometimes tells me: you promised to sell some at 10K and you didn't.
(I actually did sell at around 10K in jan, but much less than "promised").
No big deal.

NY/times square just reported in (In rainy conditions).


My wife doesn't know or care, it started as a few $50 bucks here and there and then turned into a decent value and ended up being a basis for the down payment of our house, it is now our backup funds for when she takes off work for the birth of a second child. Bitcoin doesn't mean hide from your wife and hope she never finds out.

Everyone situation is different.
It is not easy to explain in a snippet.
We are on the same page more or less.



405. Post 49002710 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Guess a year when sex with a sex-robot will feel the same (or better) than sex with a female?
It is going to be a huge shift in how society operates and what constitutes a societal norm.
IMHO, the latest would be about 2030.

Sex would be for fun and in some cases with artificial partners, procreation (at least of higher income strata) would be mostly by legal agreements through the IVF clinic (which would also CRISPR your baby). Baby upbringing-who knows.



406. Post 49002728 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: criptix on January 02, 2019, 01:22:10 AM
Kraken just went to 4500$  Huh

a while ago, not on the last 5 min chart.



407. Post 49002750 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 02, 2019, 01:30:08 AM
Guess a year where sex with a sex-robot will feel the same (or better) than sex with a female?

When we ourselves are robots, or brains in jars having our pleasure centres tickled.

I could not imagine warming up some dead eyed object and then forgetting that I filled it with my filthy outpourings the previous week. Whatever boner I could muster these days would rapidly disappear again.

good one!

well, roomba self-cleans now, so maybe your outpourings would be put to good use somehow, but I digress.
IMHO, it is clear that they will perfect this and it would be a trillion $ industry, no doubt ("Westworld" had a glimpse).



408. Post 49002832 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 02, 2019, 01:42:12 AM
Quote
Money is human happiness in the abstract; he, then, who is no longer capable of enjoying human happiness in the concrete devotes himself utterly to money. ~ Schopenhauer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMmTkKz60W8

Quote
Mama told me when I was young
"Come sit beside me, my only son
And listen closely to what I say
And if you do this it'll help you some sunny day"
"Oh, take your time, don't live too fast
Troubles will come and they will pass
You'll find a woman and you'll find love
And don't forget, son, there is someone up above"
"And be a simple kind of man
Oh, be something you love and understand
Baby be a simple kind of man
Oh, won't you do this for me, son, if you can"
"Forget your lust for the rich man's gold
All that you need is in your soul

And you can do this, oh baby, if you try
All that I want for you, my son, is to be satisfied"
"And be a simple kind of man
Oh, be something you love and understand
Baby be a simple kind of man
Oh, won't…

love that song



409. Post 49002866 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 02, 2019, 01:40:54 AM
good one!

well, roomba self-cleans now, so maybe your ouporings would be put to good use somehow, lol.

Every phrase I can associate with the idea - self cleaning, rechargeable, Amazon - used acceptable, 2 year warranty, realistic gag reflex, pleading mode, barely legal pack, carry case - is a stake through the heart of my desire.

Think about first AI chess playing machines vs AlphaZero
Stupidity/raw computation vs incredible incomprehensible genius level.

That will come and they would become irresistible to poor schmucks, like a "girl" in "Ex machina".
They would know what "buttons" to push.
It is inevitable, although by 2030 I probably won't even care.



410. Post 49016782 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

People are hodling btc just fine, yet they are not buying much, hence we got reduced from 55% to 51% even when we moved from the lows.
I get somewhat discouraged by this.
Crypto market has no notion of quality.



411. Post 49017170 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: alevlaslo on January 02, 2019, 09:06:48 PM

LN will turn bitcoin into a Visa

yeah...ummmm

I am not able to do  a personal, un-censorable, non-reversible transaction on the Visa mainnet.

You are an idiot.

Ignore engaged.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YKTkFJLYIkrGFh7h051G_AL6i57i8EOhYM2e43MjbuE/htmlview#

That calculation is factually incorrect:

1. earth has 7.9 bil inhabitants, not 10.
2. out of 7.9 bil inhabitants, 25% are children below age 14, so total number of transactionally able is not more than 5.9 bil.
3. tx can be batched.

Conclusion: even without batching upper bound is 83 years.
With batching, anywhere between 0.8 and 8.
Nothingburger.



412. Post 49017237 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

A first skirmish between lying AI and humans:

https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/31/this-clever-ai-hid-data-from-its-creators-to-cheat-at-its-appointed-task/

I hope we don't enable some strong AI with staples optimization production as it would make staples out of everything.

Relevance to bitcoin: negligible, unless people will start using AI to write code.



413. Post 49017451 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 02, 2019, 09:36:26 PM

That calculation is factually incorrect requires some assumptions that may or may not be reasonable:

1. earth has 7.9 bil inhabitants, not 10.

In decades to come? All projections of which I am aware conclude the earth's population will continue to increase.

Quote
2. out of 7.9 bil inhabitants, 25% are children below age 14, so total number of transactionally able is not more than 5.9 bil.

In decades to come? All projections of which I am aware conclude the earth's population will continue to gentrify. As if tweens and even chillens are to be locked out of ability to buy bubblegum?

Quote
3. tx can be batched.

'Splain me how one onboards _individuals_ in a permissionless decentralized manner using batching?

Quote
Conclusion: even without batching upper bound is 83 years.

Only 83? Such a timeline. So, barring any breakthoughs in life extension technology, we'll all be dead before the world can be onboarded to LN. Got it.

(Note: underlines and strikethroughs are mine, not in the Biodom original. duh.)

I've got some idle PC setups, so i think to onboard sometime during the upcoming summer vacation.
There should still be enough tx for me  Grin

Re batching, I don't see any problems with hubs on L2 when L1 is decentralized, hence tx are still permissionless.



414. Post 49018271 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

hairy & mic...that "legendary' thing is overrated hence it is mostly time passage.
both of you are already there (in reality).

Quote from: gentlemand on January 02, 2019, 10:57:54 PM
So what will people be doing at 18.15 GMT tomorrow, the exact moment of birth?


Buy some btc, lol, incidentally it is also a proof of keys day.
Maybe someone will put another 100-500 BTC into LN?

An outlier: if medium article is correct and bakkt has the approval already, it would be a positive surprise if they would do it tomorrow.
Everyone assumed that "early 2019" would be later than expected Jan 24, but what if it would be earlier?



415. Post 49018699 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 02, 2019, 11:51:41 PM
motherfucker

you guys seeing the legacy FX pairs?




What does it mean?

maybe, they expect Fed to stop tightening?
WTFK



416. Post 49019562 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 03, 2019, 01:37:57 AM
science:
https://genesenvironment.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41021-018-0114-3#main-content
Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals

Hormesis. It's a thing.

Lifespan regulation is weird.
Low calories, but balanced diet also causes an increase of the lifespan.
As far as radiation, those who were born between 1950 and 1963 might have got a slightly increased dosage due to the atmospheric testing.
I find it a little strange that radiation affects more than UV since people are exposed to UV much more in their life.

It would be interesting to quantify UV effects, if there are any.
Anecdotally, life expectancy in Hawaii is the longest in US and UV is quite brutal there (many Caucasian locals have "leather" faces).



417. Post 49038753 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 04, 2019, 04:24:12 AM
Brian Armstrong makes a half-assed apology for being a Bcash / ETH dickhead:

Quote
12/ To the extent I was critical of people working on any part of Bitcoin or crypto in the past, I apologize. My hope is that we see this technology succeed in the world, and my hat is off to anyone working to make that happen.

https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/1080910647527763968?s=21


https://youtu.be/uSjS_l3wGu8?t=351

Brian sounds like O-Ren Ishii ^^



418. Post 49048611 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Stock market in US: down 660 one day, up 669 points next day.
What's coming: down 2000 points one day, up 2000 next?
It's laughable, man.



419. Post 49048753 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 04, 2019, 04:04:56 PM
I have just bought a refurbished Iphone SE from China for 175€ to replace my older iPhone 5. No way I am buying their latest ridiculously overpriced models. Staying (at least) two generations behind seem to be the perfect spot for me. As you say it is a fucking phone, not a damn investment!


I had 64gb 6s for four years, gave it to my son, got myself XS with 256 gb memory. Why not splurge a little?
The price is ridiculous, of course, two observations:

1. Great camera. You wouldn't believe how much better it is comparing even to 7, SE non-withstanding.
2. Yes, it is a bit of a luxury (more expensive than it should be), so what? It is not a hublot for 25-40K.
In a grand picture of things, $1.2K on a two year zero % paying plan is fine.

Comparing to my "losses" in 2018 while hodling btc, it is close to nothing yet a pleasing toy.



420. Post 49048911 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 04, 2019, 05:34:04 PM

But why would any otherwise halfway intelligent adult buy any crappy, overpriced low-quality Apple product?


1. it used to be better (and maybe still is) than windows crap. I had to run W10 at home on a couple of PCs. It is the most ridiculous "nanny" system ever. Always bothers you with endless updates that is difficult to switch off.
2. less chances of a complete sellout of ALL of your data which happens on Google phones. I bought cheaper google phone once or twice. The first thing it/they did was to MANDATORY link me/the phone to my gmail account. F that! On Apple, you can choose to opt out of everything that you don't want.
3. I am a 12 year girl. /s



421. Post 49050428 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on January 04, 2019, 07:11:01 PM
Gave a welcome start boost, but needs the activity over time.  Smiley
Thanks Globb0, it seems like a nice community here and I should check it more!
We could definitely use more women here. This place is a sausagefest!
Are we still allowed to say fuck and poopyhead?
all explained .... woman are coming ....

I am sure (in addition to Cryptoqueen) some are already here..."We live among its people now, hiding in plain sight, but watching over them in secret, waiting...protecting. I have witnessed their capacity for courage, and though we are worlds apart, like us, there's more to them than meets the eye."

lol, they do dislike the 'f' word for whatever reason.



422. Post 49054804 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 05, 2019, 03:18:18 AM
20%-30% of not happening I will have to deal with that...

I am going to do the most risky bet of my life (which is not much to say as I am extremely conservative) based on that perception. Wish me luck Smiley

I will probably be ok even if I am wrong or things doesn't happen as I do expect as the most probable outcome.

Careful.   We may go much lower in the interim.  Do not put yourself in a position where you are overinvested and feel you have to cut your losses.  Only invest what you are prepared to hold firmly until well after next halvening.  

If you want to be conservative, wait until we break the long term bear line.  2014 suggests we will break it around this price level in October 2019.  

I was clearly overinvested  in Q4 2017. I can hodl it all right now.

I am just going to morgtage again, for second time in my life, for another property that I feel it is clearly well under market price. My regular income cannot cover it, but I do have enough FIAT savings to pay it for almost 10 years even with no income and without having to sell my Bitcoins.

I guess the worst that it could happen is that I would need to sell the property (probably for more than I am buying it).

As I said I am extremely conservative, but it is more risky bet I have ever made in my life. Wouldn't like to have to sell my Bitcoins at a "bad price". But I can perfectly hodl for 5+ years no matter what.

It's just that I thought I would never buy anything on debt/mortgage again (already paid my main home).... but sometimes you don't have any choice if you don't want to miss the train.

If Bitcoin pumps sometime in the next 5 years I will have made the best decision in my life. If it doesn't, I will probably have to sell the property. Hopefully not losing any money, but it will be a failure for me.

Sorry to go into granular details, but if your income cannot support that second (presumably larger) property, how do you know that they will give you a loan?
Based on what? Your savings? Last time I refi, they were real bastards about everything.
I keep a large part of my portfolio in most safe investments (or those that I think are safe), which allows me to go crazy on risk on some other parts, albeit risky stock bets seem to mostly not work in the last couple of years.




423. Post 49065726 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 05, 2019, 12:18:23 PM
20%-30% of not happening I will have to deal with that...

I am going to do the most risky bet of my life (which is not much to say as I am extremely conservative) based on that perception. Wish me luck Smiley

I will probably be ok even if I am wrong or things doesn't happen as I do expect as the most probable outcome.

Careful.   We may go much lower in the interim.  Do not put yourself in a position where you are overinvested and feel you have to cut your losses.  Only invest what you are prepared to hold firmly until well after next halvening.  

If you want to be conservative, wait until we break the long term bear line.  2014 suggests we will break it around this price level in October 2019.  

I was clearly overinvested  in Q4 2017. I can hodl it all right now.

I am just going to morgtage again, for second time in my life, for another property that I feel it is clearly well under market price. My regular income cannot cover it, but I do have enough FIAT savings to pay it for almost 10 years even with no income and without having to sell my Bitcoins.

I guess the worst that it could happen is that I would need to sell the property (probably for more than I am buying it)

As I said I am extremely conservative, but it is more risky bet I have ever made in my life. Wouldn't like to have to sell my Bitcoins at a "bad price". But I can perfectly hodl for 5+ years no matter what.

It's just that I thought I would never buy anything on debt/mortgage again (already paid my main home).... but sometimes you don't have any choice if you don't want to miss the train.

If Bitcoin pumps sometime in the next 5 years I will have made the best decision in my life. If it doesn't, I will probably have to sell the property. Hopefully not losing any money, but it will be a failure for me.

Sorry to go into granular details, but if your income cannot support that second (presumably larger) property, how do you know that they will give you a loan?
Based on what? Your savings? Last time I refi, they were real bastards about everything.



Good question. I will ask my father to endorse (is that the right word when a person gets responsible if I don't pay?) me. He (and the bank) knows I have another fully paid property (which is slightly more expensive btw), I ALSO have enough fiat savings to cover more than half of the price of the second one (not counting Bitcoin). Plus the appraisal of the property will probably show way higher value than buying value.

I assume that's enough to approve the loan. I am in a WAY better position than last (first) time, which I already finished paying after 20 years.


I know you recently, but you seem responsible  Cool, but do not involve your father in this financial operation, banks are like the devil.

My father is rich very wealthy. I am not. I don't need to (financially) worry about him. I only need to worry about the outrageous (people don't get rich by being dumb) conditions he will put on me. I have had a first call with him, after the initial no, he called me back to tell me he is going to consider it because he realises it is a clear "trade". Wish me luck Smiley

I wish you to become wealthier than your father (in time).
You would need to make a boundary, though: it is your trade, not his, even if he is peripherally involved.
Old chaps sometimes have a tendency to take over, even unconsciously so.



424. Post 49066000 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: mindrust on January 05, 2019, 05:27:10 PM

Being %100 in BTC is just crazy. I know it will pay but... it is crazy  Grin

Being 100% in btc is the same as being 100% AMZN in your stock portfolio.
I believe that btc is THE ONE, but am I 100% sure that it would be the case?
No, as I don't have a time machine.

I employed the following strategy: btc as a core position. Once accumulated, traded only small portions.
Every other crypto asset: research, then buy one time a reasonable amount, without going overboard, don't buy again.
I feel free to trade (sell) the peripheral assets and some were good enough for a chunk of profit last winter, some of which I squandered by recycling back into crypto.



425. Post 49066113 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 05, 2019, 05:31:14 PM
Some of us are investors who mined/bought because we see the value of the technology and support its potential.


Unfortunately, that 'mined' portion is going away as we speak.
This is true for people with more than 6c/kwh electricity price, which is probably the vast majority of geographic locations, at least in OECD countries.

It's EOL, unless BTC moves back above 6K or more.



426. Post 49068621 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

haiku:
 
Bitcoin hammered down
Long days passing forever
Joy is coming soon

PS ^ this was inspired by mic being hammered
Original:

Bitcoin on Trezor
Long days passing forever
Joy is coming soon



427. Post 49068757 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on January 05, 2019, 09:21:32 PM
haiku:

Bitcoin on Trezor
Long days passing forever
Joy is coming soon

Dammit send last one
Otherwise it was going to here

Cause thats a real case

Only nano s and blues for my story Roll Eyes

Thanks!
BTW, replacing Trezor with either Ledger OR nano does not break the haiku...it must mean something, lol.



428. Post 49068812 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 05, 2019, 09:28:20 PM
Haiku? OK.

Cold paper wallets
Nothing to do except wait
Oh thank you Bitcoin

very cool, merited.



429. Post 49085865 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on January 06, 2019, 06:04:33 PM
Look at that candle.
It is going straight up, yo.
My penis is green.


Pffff can it be that difficult for me
Gonna try again
....

you can check the syllable count here:
http://www.haikusyllablecounter.com/

should be 5 7 5



430. Post 49086067 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Bitcoin is surging
The new dawn is coming soon
Rejoice, everyone



431. Post 49086434 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Allow me a potentially controversial statement:

The cryptoqueen
Bringing balance to the group
We need more females



432. Post 49086864 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 06, 2019, 07:02:21 PM
Allow me a potentially controversial statement:
The cryptoqueen
Bringing balance to the group
We need more females

4 / 7 / 5 is not a thing, brother  Wink

The program indicates 4 syllables for cryptoqueen (my guess would be cryp-to-que-en) plus 1 for "the"=5, see here:
http://www.haikusyllablecounter.com/
i agree that it is surprising.

EDIT: apparently, the program is faulty as queen is considered one syllable. bad coding.

"The mic's cryptoqueen" would have fixed it, but i am leaving it as is.



433. Post 49088026 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on January 06, 2019, 07:32:33 PM
Allow me a potentially controversial statement:

The cryptoqueeen
Bringing balance to the group
We need more females

 Tongue





thanks, makes no difference in the count, though.



434. Post 49088793 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

The green dildo's up
Tone Vays is panicking
Feels good to be right




435. Post 49088864 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: d_eddie on January 06, 2019, 09:00:44 PM
Allow me a potentially controversial statement:
The cryptoqueen
Bringing balance to the group
We need more females

4 / 7 / 5 is not a thing, brother  Wink

Well the original Japanese form has 7/5/7 moras, not syllables. A long syllable counts as 2 moras, so it could be argued, in principle, that 'queen' is 2... but then 'need' would be 2, too. No way to save that, sorry  Grin

sorry, the site screwed it up, does not know that queen is ONE syllable, apparently.
how many in queeen? maybe two, since it is not a real word, like quee-en?



436. Post 49088898 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 06, 2019, 09:15:44 PM
Am I allowed to say out loud that I think the Haiku form is shit and pointless? Though full marks for creativity.

They do not speak to me in any way whatsoever. I presume if one is steeped in Bushido it moves one to tears.

Most people here have limericks in their DNA, most of which have 'Nantucket' in there somewhere.

'Tis just a green Sunday game, man.



437. Post 49089073 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

will this re-bart down or follow through?
I give it 50:50, although we keep having good weekends and bad Mondays.



438. Post 49089364 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 06, 2019, 09:48:58 PM
wtf is this haiku thing? you guys are just posting a bunch of three liners without saying anything!

we all got infected with the "haiku fever"...it will pass.



439. Post 49102500 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: Totscha on January 07, 2019, 11:49:30 AM
Today we learn that V8 is between 25 and 45 years old.  

Always figured he's a baby boomer...

baby boomers are between 54/55 and 72/73 years old now.
js



440. Post 49105379 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 07, 2019, 07:23:51 PM
https://twitter.com/eth_classic

https://twitter.com/etherchain_org/status/1082329360948969472

ETC is likely to have undergone a 51% attack.

I'm accepting donations to Barry Silbert via my usual address.

assholes can try the same on btc?
maybe, but much less likely.



441. Post 49105455 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.24h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 07, 2019, 07:39:33 PM
assholes can try the same on btc?

They'd have to have a mountain more money.
 

not money, hashing power.
money (tokens) in POS blockchains, hashing power in POW (btc).



442. Post 49107154 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 07, 2019, 08:05:20 PM
https://twitter.com/martik/status/1082031829002129413

Hey, the Russian government is going all in according to this Russian state think tank employee type.


The last thing they would do is to allow some 'think tanker' to vocalize about their yet unfulfilled true intent.



443. Post 49107258 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: kurious on January 07, 2019, 10:19:39 PM
https://twitter.com/martik/status/1082031829002129413

Hey, the Russian government is going all in according to this Russian state think tank employee type.


The last thing they would do is to allow some 'think tanker' to vocalize about their yet unfulfilled true intent.


And the last thing anyone who was a 'think tanker' - who knew the true intent of those in power - would do, is say so publicly on twatter.

yes, btc (and any other even more so) does not have enough liquidity yet to handle G20 gov orders.



444. Post 49107672 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Anybody watches "Counterpart"?

Main premise (without giving much away): the world somehow 'duplicated' itself with both worlds now stable, but largely independent.
Travel between those worlds (ours and prime) can occur only at a single place and is monitored by the mysterious "management".

This possibly harks back to many-world interpretation (Everett), only in many-world there is no way for "worlds" to interact, which is where the show uses a suspension of disbelief, I guess.

Q: imagine a world without blockchain (no Satoshi). Would such worlds (ours and that imaginary one) already be sufficiently diverged as to affect our life (society as a whole)?
I don't think so, not yet, although in the next 10-20 years the answer would probably be in affirmative, hence the investment thesis: invest into something that would be prominent in 10-20 years.



445. Post 49107828 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: julian071 on January 07, 2019, 11:10:48 PM
This ETC shitshow is gonna be another excuse for dumping BTC. Isn't it. Just because BTC rhymes with ETC.

I don't know why ETC is not closer to zero than $5 right now.



446. Post 49141493 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: bitcoincidence on January 09, 2019, 05:57:47 PM

I'm you from the future - you have to send all your BTC to you (me) to prevent harm and save the world!  Grin
(also never trust men in pink underwear)

You might wanna check this.  Grin

I'm You, Dickhead (short film, 2014)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAUjt7KWp9A


Didn't know that yet...hillarious and inspiring
Hit me right into my trauma of 2011
"I'm you dickhead. Buy bitcoin NOW...not later!"
On the other side...i might have to deal now with the "Sold everything 2014 me", the "still-whale me", or the "where is that fucking harddrive?!" me"   Grin


Funny...especially being his own stepbrother(or stepfather?)...I looked at the 2011 Wired article (which was describing bitcoin and its "plunge" from $32 to $2), then did a little of research which indicated to me (somehow) that I have to use/learn Linux and my attention quickly turned to something else.

No regrets, though, as I would have definitely lost btc on MtGox as it was a go-to place and/or I would have sold in 2014 all things considered.



447. Post 49143309 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Maybe, we can endure slower btc runup and still enjoy it later:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/techandscience/drug-to-clear-zombie-cells-from-body-could-be-first-anti-ageing-treatment-after-%E2%80%98impressive%E2%80%99-human-trial/ar-BBRZpiV

Quote
A drug to fight ageing may finally be on the horizon after the first trial in humans showed ‘impressive’ results.

not really a drug for aging, but rather for improved life during aging (increased fitness).

More 'scientific' sources:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30616998
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29988130

How much time before desatinib/quercetin combo (DQ) is available OTC?



448. Post 49162738 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):



Attribution:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/aem9x0/nows_the_best_time_to_invest/

Interesting...looks like totally artificial trader-made dips.
I will watch for the next few days (Jan 10-15 lows), maybe nibble a little.



449. Post 49164040 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: mindrust on January 10, 2019, 08:15:53 PM
I don't understand the fud, sure we went off a fucking cliff or two today but this doesn't mean we're going to have a new bottom.

$3.5k is no where near of a bloodbath to name it "capitulation". Sub $2k is.

Not sure what is the rationale for this. 6.5K to 3.1K could have been that "capitulation", or not.
There are often no sharp capitulations at the bottom, though.
IMHO, if btc goes below $2800 for more than a day or two, you can kiss it goodby as an investment thesis for a while.



450. Post 49164183 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on January 10, 2019, 08:17:38 PM
question....
anyone have recieved this KRAKEN.COM mail ?? and what to make of it...





https://www.coindesk.com/kraken-is-seeking-war-chest-investment-at-a-4-billion-valuation



You have to be accredited investor  (in US) to participate.
Accredited=either above $200K(or 250K?) in yearly salary OR at least $1mil in liquid assets (brokerage, crypto, IRA, savings, bank, etc).



451. Post 49167073 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 11, 2019, 12:17:38 AM
Crossing my fingers and toes for a breakout soon.

 Breakout. In the wrong direction.

 Sheeeit.


Those barts are mightily annoying; btc still does not behave as a $64 bil asset  Tongue.
I blame it on corrupt exchanges and Wall street coke-driven "traders".



452. Post 49184804 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

I get (and like) everything about bitcoin with one point that is not clear to me: is credit possible in btc-based financial system?
If yes, then how? If no, it could be a limitation, albeit most people might think that this is a feature.

I enjoy short term zero % credit (as i pay my bills in full every credit card cycle).
I fully understand that it is a gimmick and most people don't do that and accumulate debt, although my personal interest payment is -1.5% (1.5% reward and NO interest).
How bitcoin can/will fight this?

I would be happy to lend my btc (on a monthly basis) to a reliable party (if there is such a thing in btc world) and get back 2-3% interest on a yearly basis, but only if interest is in btc and not fiat.
IMHO, btc lending needs to be established and sooner rather than later.



453. Post 49184855 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

Quote from: nikauforest on January 12, 2019, 12:10:44 AM
I agree with you HairyMaclairy. My chart work posted yesterday is essentially looking for that final low as well. You gave good advice for those who want to be "safe"... referring to the moving averages.

it is not going to happen the same way as last time, this is pretty much a given; it could rhyme, though.



454. Post 49196729 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

A highly subjective analysis of the bottom:

In the prior cycle I stopped buying/lost desire to buy at $350, market bottomed at about $170.

This time, I lost the desire to buy at $4200. An absolute bottom projection would be at $2100 (if only for a few hours).
IF $2100 would be it, then it would probably undergo a 30% down-full reversal move within 24hr.
So, "real" flat bottom would be about $2800 and $2100 just a quick plunge and reversal.

This is partially tic, but no different than 90% of ideas on tradingview.



455. Post 49197315 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.25h):

I surrender to the "hat-cult"  too Grin.
Made an avatar (for the first time).

If xhomerx10 will feel like making a hat, it would be nice. Thanks.



456. Post 49200658 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

My first experience with poker in Las Vegas many years ago:

Got to a machine, inserted 25c (or was it a 25c token?).
First hand-royal flush, instantaneous win of $250, and it would have been 10K if I wagered $1 instead of a quarter.
Nice...although apart from risky stocks and btc, I am not really a gambling person, so I spent those $250 on dinners, etc., did not try to take down the "house".



457. Post 49201091 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on January 13, 2019, 12:07:28 AM
My first experience with poker in Las Vegas many years ago:

Got to a machine, inserted 25c (or was it a 25c token?).
First hand-royal flush, instantaneous win of $250, and it would have been 10K if I wagered $1 instead of a quarter.
Nice...although apart from risky stocks and btc, I am not really a gambling person, so I spent those $250 on dinners, etc., did not try to take down the "house".

poker ain't not about luck only, of course there are lucky moments etc....
good you didn't try to take down the house

GG sir

Sure, and since I had no experience playing it, I did not try further (after a win).
Same with stock market and btc.
If you got a solid long position, it is typically better to leave it alone.
Trading never worked for me in stocks with the exception of the first year or two, which was probably pure beginners luck plus a raging bull market.



458. Post 49201468 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

starting haiku Sunday (EU time);

mic's game is coming
someone is expected to win
this time, why not me



459. Post 49202810 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on January 13, 2019, 03:17:03 AM
starting haiku Sunday (EU time);

mic's game is coming
someone is expected to win
this time, why not me

 Wall Observer thread
 A young, slender frog lingers
 might be a gecko?

  

Avatar-sized

 
 

Fantastic and Sooooo inventive!
Thanks a lot. Let me just get it and install.
Somehow when i install the hat image, just the frog comes back, but not the frog on a hat together.



460. Post 49202924 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on January 13, 2019, 04:32:18 AM
^You just need to have patience.  Try logging out and back in and/or clearing your browser cache.  I can see you are changing it but right now there is no avatar.

edit: the original avatar is back


sorry for being clumsy, but i uploaded the hat jpg file, yet it shows the original instead.
maybe the hat image actually consists of two, but they are not merged, or it is a silly explanation?


I uploaded the right thing, so I'll just wait.
Thanks again.



461. Post 49216381 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on January 13, 2019, 01:21:45 PM
if we where in SCI-FI

and there is an offer to watch 1 day in the future (whenever day you wish, just to see where BTC stands)

how much would you offer to pay for that and how far would you wanna look ?

Maybe i already did; here it is (for free):

I saw bitcoin at $605,000 in 2029

The setup of my "time machine":

The number of people in US with wealth over $5 mil (5-millionares) is increasing (1997-2015) at 11.35% a year.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/300451/us-millionaire-households/
Assuming the same rate of increase between 2015 and 2019, now there are about 2.09 mil 5-millionares in US and 5.067 mil in the world (US seems to be at around 41% roughly).

It is unlikely that btc would cause statistically significant increase in total number of 5-millionares, therefore the variation from expected number should not be more than 5% or so.
In 2029 the total number of 5-millionares is expected to be 14.847 mil with 6.135 mil in US.

A 5% variation from 14.847 is 0.74mil. Therefore, not more than 0.74 mil btc owners would be 5-millionares.
It is fair to assume that btc-derived 5-millionares would have the vast majority of their wealth from btc alone, otherwise they would be in the regular 95%.

The stat data below suggest that about 0.75 mil btc owners have minimally 7.44 btc:
https://medium.com/@BambouClub/are-you-in-the-bitcoin-1-a-new-model-of-the-distribution-of-bitcoin-wealth-6adb0d4a6a95

Therefore, assuming that 90% of btc-owners wealth would come from btc and not more that 5% of global 5-millionares would come from btc wealth in 2029,
the numbers indicate an approximately $4.5 mil value (90% of 5 mil) for 7.44 btc, making it about $605,000/btc.



462. Post 49219335 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: Cryptotourist on January 13, 2019, 10:02:29 PM
if we where in SCI-FI

and there is an offer to watch 1 day in the future (whenever day you wish, just to see where BTC stands)

how much would you offer to pay for that and how far would you wanna look ?

Maybe i already did; here it is (for free):

I saw bitcoin at $605,000 in 2029

The setup of my "time machine"

The number of people in US with wealth over $5 mil (5-millionares) is increasing (1997-2015) at 11.35% a year.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/300451/us-millionaire-households/
Assuming the same rate of increase between 2015 and 2019, there are about 2.09 mil 5-millionares in US now and 5.067 mil in the world (US seems to be at around 41% roughly).
It is unlikely that btc would cause statistically significant increase in total number of 5-millionares, therefore the variation from the expected number should not differ by more than 5%.
In 2029 the total number of 5-millionares is expected to be 14.847 mil with 6.135 mil in US.
A 5% variation from 14.847 is 0.74mil. Therefore, not more than 0.74 mil btc owners would be 5-millionares.
It is fair to assume that btc-derived 5-millionares would have the vast majority of their wealth from btc alone, otherwise they would be in the regular 95%.
The statistics below suggest that about 0.75 mil btc owners have minimally 7.44 btc
https://medium.com/@BambouClub/are-you-in-the-bitcoin-1-a-new-model-of-the-distribution-of-bitcoin-wealth-6adb0d4a6a95

Therefore, assuming that 90% of btc-owners wealth come from btc and not more than 5% of global 5-millionares would come from btc wealth in 2029,
the numbers indicate $4.5 mil value (90% of 5 mil) for 7.44 btc, making it about $605,000/btc.


Loved your analysis. I'll have another drag of that hopium bong please!
....paf pif pang wang....


you forgot to look at the starting line of discussion.
it starts: "If we were in sci-fi..."
The rest follows.
Kapish?
Just a nice playful weekend spirit, sorry.



463. Post 49219504 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: stoat on January 13, 2019, 10:26:49 PM
What are the hats in aid of?

To some, hats epitomize the reverse-(sans-culottes) of the 21 century...
To others, it's like a club.
To the rest, it is just a fun meme.

Make a choice of what it is to you.



464. Post 49219596 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: kurious on January 13, 2019, 10:49:39 PM
if we where in SCI-FI

and there is an offer to watch 1 day in the future (whenever day you wish, just to see where BTC stands)

how much would you offer to pay for that and how far would you wanna look ?


10 Bitcoin for December 2021.

thats a ver reasonable pick
and depending on one's HODL, I guess it may cost very very much of it in %'s of that HODL amount
Wink

..I enjoyed the fun of you prompting some fantasy crystal ball thinking.

I should probably think of paying more, but what holds me back is the (not necessarily rational) view that if the result showed that the price was around what it is now, I might kick myself.  

If I found out for sure it was going to be as high as I expect, it would be amazingly cheap foreknowledge, a fantastic opportunity.  I'd simply sell all the liquid assets I have, borrow to the hilt and buy WAY more than I already am right now. Who wouldn't?

To be honest, this week I have already started buying.  Certainty would be the only thing that would increase it, as I have already started buying what some might deem reckless amounts.  Within a couple of weeks I should have all all the BTC back I sold in Dec '17 and some. This is a risk/ benefit assessment based upon my gut feeling - which has more often than not been a good idea, as it is the same gut feeling that got me into Bitcoin in the first place. However, it is not a guaranteed thing.  

Knowing it was 'a cert' would mean an insane frenzy of buying all I possibly could. Of course Wink

if you only had a window into price in $ and NOTHING else, it would be an insufficient info, obviously.
After all, people of Zimbabwe are not the richest, yet at some point each had hundreds of trillions or more of their $$.
Nothing like this would happen in US, but it just shows that you need to compare $ values to the prices of goods.
BTC never went to a price of the typical US/EU house. Will it? I would probably answer in the affirmative.



465. Post 49235191 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: mindrust on January 14, 2019, 07:58:00 PM
When I was younger I was able to sleep in the middle of a death metal concert. Now at my middle age, I can't stand a slightest noise. Not just while I sleep but also when I am awake. Sometimes I just want to strangle the people who talk way too loudly. I want to shout at their faces "SHUT THE FUCK UP!"

Btw I bought some more today. Wink

Hyperacusis...maybe time to see a doc. Multiple causes.



466. Post 49235211 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 14, 2019, 08:02:07 PM
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/01/14/russia-plans-tackle-us-sanctions-bitcoin-investment-says-kremlin/

Quote
Russia is preparing an investment in Bitcoin to replace the US dollar as a reserve currency in a bid to tackle US sanctions, according to a Russian economist with close ties to the Kremlin.
Cryptocurrencies have seen a surge of interest in Russia, with President Vladimir Putin expressing interest in the digital assets in recent months. Mr Ginko believes Bitcoin and the wider cryptocurrency industry now account for 8pc of Russia’s GDP, and investment to bolster the country’s reserves with Bitcoin could start as soon as February.

“[The] Russian government is about to make a step to start diversifying financial reserves into Bitcoin since Russia [is] forced by US sanctions to dump US Treasury bonds and [take] back US dollars,” Mr Ginko said.

“These sanctions and the will to adopt modern financial technologies lead Russia to the way of investing its reserves into Bitcoin.”

Were those russian barts? Unlikely, but possible.



467. Post 49252547 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: kenzawak on January 15, 2019, 11:12:54 PM
Cryptopia's hack, Ethereum's fork delayed, ETF probably denied thanks to the shutdown, Bakkt maybe delayed to April... mehhh, no need to worry.



While I generally agree, let's not simplify things.
Miners are experiencing stress (losing money) as we speak.
BTC is running on POW, which is probably profitable in a fewer and fewer places right now.



468. Post 49270231 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: Bitcoinaire on January 16, 2019, 05:32:48 PM
Repost of a classic chart (source unknown):



Leading up to halving price starts to move. Maybe it's different this time.

My major objection to that graph is that the underlying cause of cyclicality is obviously the halving process (so far).
Considering that halvings are on the same four year schedule (or about), why would bull/bear cycles suddenly increase in duration at this moment in time?

Secondly, that graph is internally inconsistent. If cycle duration is increased by roughly 40% in the next iteration, then why the bull period before the halving is not increased by the same proportion. last time bull started in Sept 2015, halving was in June 2016, so bull started 9 mo prior to halving. Applying 40% duration increase would give us roughly 12.5 mo or about April 2019 bull start, not October.

However, IMHO, next bull would probably be the last one (or penultimate) driven mostly by halvings because at some point we would have to transition to a situation where miners make money mostly from tx and not from block mining.
That could result (at some point) in a bear market being longer than preceding bull.
Hopefully, it won't happen until ATH is 200K-600K.

Plus, pretty please, with sugar on top, Mr Market, could you give us some time for distribution (on top)?
All I ask is two weeks, tops....pleeese.....<Mr Market is silent>



469. Post 49270451 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on January 16, 2019, 10:28:50 PM


Why two merits for this image? What am I missing here? Undecided

Going from hopeful optimist Bart to worrywart SpongeBOb explains some setups very well.
I certainly have both mindsets fighting all the time (at least during bear; in bull, I am all Bart with a large doze of Homer).



470. Post 49272734 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

A historic perspective on the last sharp bottom and a flat afterwards (circa 2015).

1. A post on the very bottom day:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg10146987#msg10146987
Well, they do panic during bottoms, indeed.

2. A couple of months later some people were already predicting better things (32K, not 20K, but it is close; JJG agreed, BTW):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg10657883#msg10657883
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg10658020#msg10658020

3. by summer 2015 some gave up hope (for a bull):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg11561452#msg11561452

4. others are cool... I am looking at you, LFC_Bitcoin:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg11770952#msg11770952

5. then Stolfi came in to rub it in during September, 2015.

6. Then, the bull suddenly happened.

It might not repeat, but I sure hope that it would rhyme with the last bull.

P.S. i only looked at a few dozen posts or so, randomly chosen, just by jumping between pages. if you had a deep insight during that time about going to 20K in 2-2.5 years, please share.



471. Post 49306853 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Quote from: jojo69 on January 19, 2019, 02:16:49 AM


Bitcoin is a mechanism to transfer wealth from the impatient to the patient.

I am trying to balance the above with "In the long run were are all dead" quip.
No regrets for any sell or buy.



472. Post 49307256 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.26h):

Wyoming precedent-setting cryptocurrency law story is getting bigger... (not sure if it was already posted)..some details are emerging that bode well:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/darrynpollock/2019/01/18/wyoming-introduces-bill-offering-cryptocurrencies-legal-clarity-to-attract-blockchain-business





473. Post 49317433 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 19, 2019, 05:21:41 PM
Sideways, sideways
Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
When they come for you?

Modded to haiku 5-7-5:

Sideways, forever
Singing: When they come for you..
When they come for you?



474. Post 49317459 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on January 19, 2019, 05:34:15 PM
via Imgflip Meme Generator

Gonna break my bitcoin boredom with Some LEBOWSKI shit

Wink

Good weekend WO’s

Give me a weekendPUMP to drink uppon when I’m finish here Grin

something is missing... a white russian, perhaps.



475. Post 49317648 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 19, 2019, 05:46:10 PM
Sideways, sideways
Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
When they come for you?

Modded to haiku 5-7-5:

Sideways, forever
Singing: When they come for you..
When they come for you?

How you dare?!?!

Your haiku has broken all the meaning of my masterpiece!  Angry

Respect art! Will ya?

I thought that is was open source, lol



476. Post 49320226 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 19, 2019, 09:30:22 PM

 If the Democrats refuse this deal, I fear we'll legitimately be facing a civil war situation.


Based on what?

Most people did not even register the shutdown (fully), yet alone getting up in arms about it.
So far, it is seriously affecting about (0.8/325.7)X4(family size)=1% of the population.
If markets go down 1000-2000 points in one session, then it would be another story.

Take it easy, Bob.



477. Post 49322073 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

For a potential future societal structure I suggest to read or re-read "Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson (first published in 1992).



478. Post 49322261 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: jojo69 on January 20, 2019, 01:11:47 AM
For a potential future societal structure I suggest to read or re-read "Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson (first published in 1992).


does that mean I get my own nuclear submarine?

I don't remember a sub, but recall that, perhaps, there was an aircraft carrier, but that's not too relevant.



479. Post 49322306 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: Ibian on January 20, 2019, 01:26:05 AM
For a potential future societal structure I suggest to read or re-read "Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson (first published in 1992).

Cliffnotes?

too complex, predicted 'electronic currency', 'virtual reality', etc, etc.
one particular prediction is privatization of government functions, with sovereign enclaves forming, mostly based on economies and not policies.
A very much decentralized world with all possible pluses and minuses.



480. Post 49322659 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on January 20, 2019, 01:58:24 AM
For a potential future societal structure I suggest to read or re-read "Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson (first published in 1992).

Cliffnotes?

 Deadpool delivers pizza.  I don't think we can seriously believe anything was "predicted" given that it was published in 1992.

 You can listen to it while you're working on other things... that way it wont be an entire waste of your time Wink

edit: forgot the link!  Part 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-ZiG4FsYAg  (and only 8 hours... suggest you boost the speed to 1.5X)


a bit more happening than just pizza delivery...lol
thanks for the link.

Quote from: Last of the V8s on January 20, 2019, 02:03:30 AM

... the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

unrelated to the content of the quote...
Murad Mahmudov (second person quoted) is that 20-something guy who is full of pseudo-scientific explanations as to why btc has to go to $1700 first (then to 10mil), which on balance is mightily annoying.
I guess he wants btc to get low before his fund buy-in. I don't blame him.
IMHO, not enough time (in relation to halving) for that if cycle is about to increase in duration (as he claims).



481. Post 49322955 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on January 20, 2019, 02:48:16 AM
... the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
unrelated to the content of the quote...
Murad Mahmudov (second person quoted) is that 20-something guy who is full of pseudo-scientific explanations as to why btc has to go to $1700 first (then to 10mil), which on balance is mightily annoying.
I guess he wants btc to get low before his fund buy-in. I don't blame him.
IMHO, not enough time (in relation to halving) for that if cycle is about to increase in duration (as he claims).
you know that's partly why I left it ambiguous who I was calling what. i don't even really think any of the people there are 'the worst', but they are certainly full of crap

indeed



482. Post 49340688 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

a message from myself to "mysef, 13 mo ago" (maybe he would get smarter):

The plunge continues
When will the new trend be here?
Looking for action



483. Post 49341164 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 21, 2019, 12:58:41 AM
a message from myself to "mysef, 13 mo ago" (maybe he would get smarter):

The plunge continues
When will the new trend be here?
Looking for action

We are not "in"  "plunge," currently.

This is two weeks worth of flat, but really zooming out shows 2 months worth of flat.

Remember mid-November?

Now, that was a "plunge."

The plunge (from 20K) that is, cannot fit everything in a haiku's 17 syllables.
To me, we are still in it, recent flat non-withstanding.
Plus, a bit of poetic license can be applied, right Wink



484. Post 49341209 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 21, 2019, 01:40:40 AM
a message from myself to "mysef, 13 mo ago" (maybe he would get smarter):

The plunge continues
When will the new trend be here?
Looking for action

We are not "in"  "plunge," currently.

This is two weeks worth of flat, but really zooming out shows 2 months worth of flat.

Remember mid-November?

Now, that was a "plunge."

The plunge (from 20K) that is, cannot fit everything in a haiku's 17 syllables.
To me, we are still in it, recent flat non-withstanding.
Plus, a bit of poetic license can be applied, right Wink

haikus can go fuck themselves.   Tongue

well, you do write them (if you remove a bit);

two weeks worth of flat..
Remember mid-November?
Now, that was a plunge.



485. Post 49341234 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Let's blame someone, lol.
I'll start with a "hedgehog" murad mahmudov.
Why not?

looking forward to do some grinning (out of pure boredom).



486. Post 49353722 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

A few interesting factoids and opinions:

Davos: the backlash
Corp profits above pay trend for a while. Author thinks that it should go back to trend.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-21/davos-the-backlash-against-fat-cat-bosses-is-coming

An opposite opinion: why a few have so many?
Pareto law as an explanation (J. Peterson):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k_FfS1kHfY

Finally: tax collection employes supercomputer/service
https://www.wnd.com/2019/01/big-data-meets-big-govt-new-irs-spy-software/
Quote
It could also flag a person whose tax return shows relatively low annual income but whose social-media posts indicate something entirely different.

Integration of all three:

If the trend would become toward more taxation (as Davos article predicts), then the rich would probably employ crypto in some form, hopefully, bitcoin.
Bitcoin is dealing with high gini already, so it won't be a problem to absorb a $ trillion or two or ten.



487. Post 49355565 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: Paashaas on January 21, 2019, 07:50:18 PM
The Long And Winding Road To A $10 Million Bitcoin.

https://medium.com/@lucidfunds/the-long-and-winding-road-to-10-million-bitcoin-4b1c83d26e5d


He lost me at "When the final bottom is in, which we believe will be below $1,000".
With no explanation provided whatsoever, apart from 'regulation would continue' it was just annoying numerology, nothing else.

Quote
If we have to wait for $400,000 to be reached then the demand has come from the Cowboys [those investors with free-hand in asset selection].....

interesting



488. Post 49355723 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on January 21, 2019, 08:34:21 PM
and there's no such thing as lack of upward mobility.

I agree that each individual case mostly depends on someone's effort, however, there is some evidence that upward mobility has declined (for some reason, especially in the Midwest, less in NY, Massachusetts and Montana):
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6336/398

You can argue why it happened, but not whether it happened or not, according to the authors.



489. Post 49357615 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 21, 2019, 09:13:54 PM
Did somebody previously post a graph or a chart detailing what happens to the price every January (we usually slump every Jan?).

Any way, curious to know people’s thoughts that if we stay over $3,200 as we enter February - Have we definitely seen the bottom of this cycle?

Thoughts?

You probably refer to a chart here:
https://bitcoinist.com/january-crypto-crash-nothing-new/

A drop in Jan 2015, 2016 and 2017, a little in 2018, most centered on Jan 12-Jan 18.
Timeline-wise we passed it already, which means nothing, of course.
Personally, I still think that we had our "January" effect in December.



490. Post 49373836 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

If you had a choice:

1. Btc at 20K average for the next 10 years with fluctuation only between 15K and 25K. It goes up to 15K tomorrow (just for the purposes of scenario comparison).

2. Boom and bust scenario where btc could be 3K or 100K on any particular day in the next 10 years.

What would be your preference?

Quote from: Bitcoinaire on January 22, 2019, 11:31:00 PM
JP Morgan will buy bitcoins on BAKKT when they open.

No, they won't. It would solve nothing for them. Too small so far.



491. Post 49376533 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 23, 2019, 04:50:20 AM
Anyone who has time to complain about wealth inequality doesn't really deserve moving upwards in the food chain, as they could've invested the same time on figuring out sensible goals for their life as well as some steps towards them.

As a person who had his first full time job being slightly less than 17 (took a year after the high school before enrolling in uni as I wanted to make sure that I was truly interested in this field), I say that both of you (jbreher and BTCMILLIONAIRE) are on the wrong side on this subject. Many times it is just random events, and not the effort. I had a few situations where a very sustained and qualified effort was there, but results were lacking and, in the opposite, when I almost did not try, yet the rewards were magnificent (as far as getting what i wanted accomplished fast). The connection between the effort and the results is tenuous at best.

On a side note:
Yeah, I get the tough love, but let see how you will react when your job is taken away by a super-smart AI in the near future.
There is a reason why all chess championships are not commercially viable anymore (ask Gary Kasparov) since nobody cares about how earthlings play when AlphaZero shows a true genius in the game and plays at the level humans can barely comprehend. Almost all of us might end up in a human "zoo" even sooner than I expect. Hopefully, bitcoin will make our days there more pleasant, but there cannot be any guarantees.



492. Post 49377775 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 23, 2019, 07:33:52 AM
I say that both of you (jbreher and BTCMILLIONAIRE) are on the wrong side on this subject. Many times it is just random events, and not the effort.

Which is, of course, why the lazy and the stupid are universally wallowing in riches, and the soup kitchens cater to those that identify opportunities and work ceaselessly to attain the next rung up.

Right.

 Roll Eyes

I have no idea what whining and the lack of effort both of you keep talking about. It is probably something personal since you are so adamant about it.
Watch "Trading places". A bit of exaggeration, but an interesting idea. Not sure if it was tried IRL, though.
There is an interesting source, though:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-hedge-fund-geniuses-got-beaten-by-monkeys-again-2015-06-25



493. Post 49389280 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: jojo69 on January 23, 2019, 05:04:13 PM


I have no idea what whining and the lack of effort both of you keep talking about. It is probably something personal since you are so adamant about it.


Get a JOB Mr. Lebowski

...The old man told me to take any rug in the house.



494. Post 49389378 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 23, 2019, 08:45:01 PM
Mempool rising.  Bumped up my transaction fees to 30 sats as want to be confident of getting into the next block.

according to earn you overpaid by 200%, but miners appreciate your donation.



495. Post 49392039 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 23, 2019, 11:55:39 PM
In the something awful category, WeChat publishes real time deadbeat debtor map on your phone complete with personally identifying information and details of debt owed


This and many other things 'social' were predicted in this underappreciated book by Gary Shteyngart (first published in 2010?)

https://www.amazon.com/Super-Sad-True-Love-Story/dp/0812977866




496. Post 49409048 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 25, 2019, 12:21:31 AM


Apparently, fingertips have the most nerve endings, lol.
Not sure what crack to make out of it...



497. Post 49410307 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.27h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 25, 2019, 03:14:32 AM
They still use cheques in the USA.

In 2008 I had to explain to a 20 something employee what a cheque was and how she needed to take it to the bank to deposit it. She had never seen one in her life.  

To be fair, I haven’t seen one since.  I haven’t even touched cash for a couple years now except for one parking lot on the English seaside which trapped my car.  


I like cash, but, yes, the use of it is very limited.
Checks in US are mostly used for one-off payments, especially cashiers checks.
Reason: it takes zero $ to write and/or deposit a check, yet it costs $30 ($15+$15) to do a bank wire.
ACH is mostly free, but takes a few days typically.
Nobody uses checks to pay for groceries or movie tickets.
Some small businesses also OK with checks because they don't have to pay 3-5% to credit card companies.



498. Post 49423006 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 25, 2019, 08:54:32 PM

About to watch ‘The Big Lebowski’.

This had better be good Wink

It is definitely a "cult classic'.
You are either one of those who get it or not, which is probably determined by a simple mendelian inheritance, lol.
I have friends who are ambivalent, but I dig it and very much so.



499. Post 49435351 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

A legend of the priest who could predict whether a new baby would be a boy or a girl:

There was an area priest, who was known for his ability to always predict baby's gender with 100% accuracy.
It was going on for decades and everyone marveled at his abilities.
Eventually, the priest grew old and sick and just before he passed away, a parishioner asked:
"Please tell me a secret: how you were able to do it?"
Come closer, said the priest and I will reveal my secret to you:
"I tell the family that it would be a girl, but in the church book I write that it would be a boy.
Then, if it is a girl, my prediction is correct and if it is a boy, then I tell them that they might have a mistaken memory, then ask them to look at the church records and there it says: "a boy", so they are happy and content."




500. Post 49440782 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Well, since mic kicked off haiku Sunday...(in EU)...

Infinite sadness
Still, bitcoin is not rising
When will it happen?



501. Post 49458048 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Bitcoin is flat here
Decided to install grin
Had little spare time


Weird stuff, got it working for now out of pure boredom^^.
Could be bitcoin's little brother (in time), mostly for spending; easier to scale, perhaps.



502. Post 49461360 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: Paashaas on January 28, 2019, 04:50:14 AM
The buy walls are fine and this is just a small blip, too much panic over here, $25 dollars drop and everyones screaming were  going down a grand. Goodnight everyone.

During the next bear market when Bitcoin capitulate to $40k, i wonder if people still shitting in their pants  Smiley

That's almost exactly Bobby Lee's numbers.
I would disagree with the bottom at $2500, though.

333K --> 41K
https://twitter.com/bobbyclee/status/1071100283638280194



503. Post 49461628 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: nc50lc on January 28, 2019, 05:37:40 AM
 Cheesy LOL
You used the N letter to make the 2 of 2019?  Cheesy
Whoa, a keen eye for edits. Side effect of OCD I guess...

The order was issued in 1933.
This proves that FDR had a "time machine".
Ta-da-da-daaa.



504. Post 49475934 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Perhaps, bitcoin is declining because financiers on wall street associated themselves with a pure lunacy of MMT.
Before, some of them came to a right conclusion that something needs to be done, aka bitcoin came in and established itself as a sound money candidate worth considering.
Now (in the last 12 mo exceedingly so), however, they (Wall street) got in love with MMT, according to which the level of debt does not matter as long as the level of inflation is manageable and you make debt mostly in your own sovereign currency. The rise of MMT "opinion value" more or less correlated with the decline of btc.

"In this theory, sovereign government is not financially constrained in its ability to spend; it is argued that the government can afford to buy anything that is for sale in currency that it issues (there may be political constraints, like a debt ceiling law)."

I don't know what will follow, but I am sure that our kids will pay for our generation(s) fallacies.
I cannot play the stock market game well anymore because I don't have a first idea what these over-leveraged companies are actually worth.

We might even have to pay for this ourselves within 10 (20?) years or so, and then bitcoin or it's descendants time would come to save the day.





505. Post 49476047 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on January 28, 2019, 11:44:28 AM
Going to take this opportunity to shill two prog rock albums in case anyone here is into that. Both are actually from 2017 as opposed to the 1970s though.

King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard - Flying Microtonal Banana
As the name suggests, this one is microtonal, e.g. using notes that aren't represented on traditional chromatic 12-note scales.

King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard - Polygondwanaland
This one isn't, but still good.

KGATLW, yeahhh.
Here is "The Crumbling Castle":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ycw7udHOnw

Opinions can vary, but I get goosebumps from this stuff.



506. Post 49476985 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on January 29, 2019, 03:29:41 AM
I have to admit to being pretty paranoid at times yet I cling to the fact that you are only that if they are not out to get you. With that preface, I have often wondered at the recommendations that seem to pop up now and again on google news or my youtube feed referencing conversations I have recently had. For example, last night I was jamming with my brother in law and we ended up talking about a voice box like Frampton uses in the classic "Do you feel like we do". I mentioned that the only other artist I could remember off hand was Joe Walsh and Rocky Mountain Way and low and behold..today in my youtube list there it was. Our phones where in the other room sitting on the kitchen table I will add..eerie I have to say.

Today I saw this article about the facetime app on iphones. Its like they dont even care if you know or not that they are monitoring and stealing your data 24/7.  fml
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/28/apple-facetime-bug-lets-you-listen-even-if-someone-doesnt-answer.html

google home, amazon's alexa and pretty much all smart TV's are constantly listening to all conversations, then, probably give you ads at the minimum.



507. Post 49506012 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 30, 2019, 05:13:26 PM
I hate you, Theymos.

At MicroCenter right now buying a pre-made 2080ti system for GRoIN mining.

$2,199...

Sheeeeit.

I really dislike you RN.

Super cereal.

1. It is a hobby...
2. that said, 1080 ti, especially mildly used is better for the buck.
3. #2 is true only if you already have a setup (motherboard, risers, ssd, memory, PSU)...
I played with it, not much to do...it is very stable.

I am not going crazy and buy four more cards, at least I hope so  Grin

Guys, if you like POW, check it out-you will learn lots, have fun and maybe contribute to btc "little bro" development.
Fair warning, though: it works best in Linux, virtual machine in windows is possible, but some extra steps would be needed.



508. Post 49506732 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on January 30, 2019, 09:37:16 PM
W


Humps, fractals, five fingered boogie and a bit more. Let the accumulation games begin. #dyor
https://www.dothefinancial.info/profitunity-trading/using-fractals-and-leverage.html



^^^ the yellow line projection is not very likely because it suggests a flat until and even after July 2020.
Since halving would occur in May 2020, current prices would result in basically nobody being able to mine without a loss, so it is unlikely to happen.
In unlikely scenario that it would happen, most of current hashing power would disappear, undermining btc security.
If that happens, I don't see how btc would be able to remain the leader.

A more likely scenario would be for a bull to start 9-12 mo before halving or by Summer-Fall of 2019 at the latest.



509. Post 49507609 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: Searing on January 31, 2019, 12:08:35 AM
Look at each coin in your crypto portfolio, which coins spark joy?

Just read this.... thought of you’re Guys answers———-> *grin* ?? Roll Eyes

'my joy' 'sparked' much higher at 18k BTC FYI...FML...

Brad

18K was a good trade. Most missed the spot.
However, once you sold a chunk, sooner or later you would feel stupid.
I have been through this on multiple occasions.
The best is to either not sell or sell and completely let that btc go (from your heart).
Go to vacation, etc, etc.



510. Post 49507624 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 31, 2019, 12:10:47 AM
Murad claims bottom to be found between 300 W MA and 400 W MA.

https://twitter.com/muststopmurad/status/1090762552102084614?s=21





That's just "numerology". What step back he is talking about?
There is nothing truly predictable in his desire for BTC to retrace  MA300 instead of MA 200, which it already did.
Gibberish.

Quote from: windjc on January 31, 2019, 12:13:23 AM
Historically bear market lows have been set before 11 months prior to each halving. We should expect the same again.

The market low occurred on Jan 14 2015, halving was on July 09, 2016, almost exactly 18 mo later, unless you consider (on intraday move on Aug 24, 2015, which should NOT count) the low to be on Aug 24, 2015. In fact, it was low on that day (Aug 24, 2015) only on some exchanges, exchange average is $196, which is NOT the low of the cycle.

Prior halving was on Nov 28, 2012 with a low on Nov 17, 2011, so this was very close to 11 mo, being 12 mo and a few days.

I say that the low would lie (most likely) anywhere between 12-18 months before the halving, although the number of tries so far (two) is too small.
Therefore, the low being anywhere between Nov 2, 2018 (18 mo to May 2, 2020) and May 2, 2019 would make sense.
The flat between Dec 15, 2018 and May 2019 is the most probable scenario, IMHO.



511. Post 49507924 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 31, 2019, 12:27:58 AM
Risk free trades are good trades.

never seen those, but I am not an insider.





512. Post 49509968 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

We got a clear bull signal:
Vinny is predicting doom again.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2019/01/30/blow-to-bitcoin-as-ceo-warns-crypto-winter-could-turn-nuclear

The last time he did this at around 1K during the block size "debate", btc declined 10-15%, then rallied 2174% to ATH.

Get ready for a rally...after maybe a few % points to the downside or, maybe, none.



513. Post 49526435 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.28h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on February 01, 2019, 02:28:28 AM
If grin takes of  and gets a big user base we might see a scenario where more grins are actually lost/destroyed then are being made,and if so the price will be stable and even go up.

Is this going to happen? Well the world economy is not a zero sum game, and the world economy is growing rapidly so there is room for a expanding currency, that’s why the US dollar is not in hyperinflation.
All new dollars printed are absorbed by the expanding economy. This of course only works if the currency is widely accepted on a global scale.

As I understand it grin is anonymous and untraceable, this might not go down well with regulators, and they might ban it from exchanges and on/of ramps.
If so, then it won’t be a popular global currency, but rather a fringe currency traded on a few shady exchanges with a small user base, and subsequently die from inflation.

If on the other hand it is not banned, and if it grows so big that the demand is equal to or outgrows 60 grins a minute, it might be the actual world cyber currency of the future for payments. (rather than bitcoins roll as digital gold/storage)

The road there will however be long and hard, and in the near future the supply will vastly outgrow the demand, and as a consequence the price will for the years to come be very low.

And some easy to use wallets need to be developed soon, and app wallets must integrate grin, and major exchanges must add grin.

A lot of ifs, but success is not against the laws of economics.
When Coinomi or Abra integrates grin I might buy some.

Why don't you mine some? It's fun to learn and all you need is a GPU card or two plus the rest of PC (CPU, memory, SSD, motherboard, powersupply).
I am not sure that price would be very low as VCs are mining it (invested at least $100mil).
Mining is much less risky than buying outright.

Sorry, plucking my favorite parts of your post...

I also think that bitcoin being a store of value and grin being spendable (inflationary, but less and less in %% going forward) could be a good combo like checking (grin) and savings/investment (bitcoin) accounts.



514. Post 49540513 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: Kylapoiss on February 02, 2019, 12:59:38 AM


Wasn't it at 18 a few days ago?
Not sure what to make of it.



515. Post 49541495 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: smartcomet on February 02, 2019, 03:14:20 AM
https://twitter.com/coolhandcanuck/status/1090542945332162560
Quote
$700 Quintillion Asteroid Ignites Space Mining Gold Rush Between Mars and Jupiter - exploration to start 2022

Enough gold, iron to give each person on earth billions worth of the.....not so precious metals..... https://www.outerplaces.com/science/item/17778-700-quintillion-dollar-asteroid-space-mining-gold-rush-mars-jupiter … via

Many sci-fi movies depict future as being heavy-metal and/or heavily into gold.
Examples: "Chronicles of Riddick" (Necromonger civi), "Stargate", many others.
Asteroid mining would explain the rationale.
On the other hand, plastics would be more difficult to come by in the future since they are made from oil or natural gas, which is definitely in less supply than asteroid iron/nickel/gold at the near earth orbits.



516. Post 49553793 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: infofront on February 02, 2019, 06:43:49 PM
Let me tell you a story about the 14/15 bear market. My wife was in her masters program at the time and I needed $5k for tuition. $5k then was 22 BTC. I was in between clients and wasn’t going to be paid for 3 months. So I sold the BTC right? Wrong. I sold my car. Got $6k for it.

https://twitter.com/americanhodl/status/1091192275554562048
^HERO? Smiley

The rest of the story is hilarious (and inspiring) too:
<image removed>

What are you willing to sacrifice this bear market in order to win?

That story makes little sense.
He makes 250K a year, yet cannot spend $300 a mo on a $20K car payment?
Something here does not compute.
I appreciate his dedication to the btc cause, though.



517. Post 49554626 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: infofront on February 02, 2019, 09:50:18 PM
Next bottom at $40k sounds reasonable
Yeah when high is a million



Don’t go retarded ...... +- 240K or something Roll Eyes
I'm expecting $50kish as the high, y'all expecting extremely gains run after run.

$90K-$110K in Dec. 2022.
$32K in Dec. 2025

prior highs...$32, $1160 (X36), 19783 (X17)
17X is 0.472X36, therefore, if we would continue to decline in bounce proportionally, then the next bounce would be 0.472X17=8.02X
8.02X19783=$158659

However, it is a bit strange to keep declining 83-85% in each bear, but keep bouncing lower and lower X-times each time.
So, if the pattern of lower bounce would be broken, than we can go as high as, say, 17X, resulting in btc at $336111 at the next ATH.
The fact that btc keeps declining 83-85% in each bear is a bit puzzling to me. I expected less this time.



518. Post 49554639 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on February 02, 2019, 10:06:39 PM
via Imgflip Meme Generator

man, that's a lot of sugar  Wink



519. Post 49554679 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 02, 2019, 09:31:42 PM

That story makes little sense.
He makes 250K a year, yet cannot spend $300 a mo on a $20K car payment?
Something here does not compute.
I appreciate his dedication to the btc cause, though.

I think he makes 250K/yr...now

Nope, he said that it was embarrassing to show up on that bike when his business partner was buying his second BMW.
Whatever. Clearly, it was some short term cash flow problem caused by btc over-investment, but he was lucky to have the trend making it worthwhile.



520. Post 49554916 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: kurious on February 02, 2019, 10:16:59 PM
  Plus, there won't be enough emmission to satisfy demand.

we're all just getting old

I like to think of it as quality over quantity, but the IVF clinic disagrees and my 22-year old supermodel g/f is now looking at me somewhat differently.

mic-style pics or she is not real  Grin



521. Post 49556697 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Panthera capital (the first hedgefund in blockchain):

https://www.ccn.com/why-pantera-capital-says-bitcoin-bear-market-different

Check the embedded podcast.
At around 6:00 he (Morehead) is saying that he had an investor coming in with $5mil in 2014-2015 and getting out with $200mil in 2017.
Nice!



522. Post 49568620 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 03, 2019, 05:00:15 AM

Based on history, you can assert that nobody needs bitcoin; however, we are living in a new world in which the computer and the internet has become a staple of modern human living.  Within these modern changes, bitcoin has the potential to serve a very central role in terms of individual sovereignty and ability to control some of his/her value holdings and transfers.  

You may be having difficulties understanding any "need for bitcoin" because you are trying to downplay the importance of modern living and perhaps you envision a world without modern communications.... perhaps a world in which gold and silver has a role, but since we are moving to a different kind of world and bitcoin has accomplished a kind of paradigm shift in what it is able to provide and likely to provide, you are deluded into thinking that no one needs it, merely because it had not existed before 2009, and really, has not achieved, so far, any kind of significant levels of adoption.

So, yeah, currently, we have a world in which less than  1% of the world has adopted bitcoin in any kind of tangible way, and that level of adoption still remains quite superficial.  Part of the reason to invest into bitcoin continues to be recognizing a vision in which its adoption increases and also it's value and utility will increase along with that.  If you do not hedge into bitcoin in any kind of way, then you will merely have to run after this bitcoin train at a higher price...

Nice write up, merited.

I wonder a little what would happen if a major bitcoin adoption happens through a gigantic LN hub, made by Square, or a few hubs like this.
Perhaps, Square is waiting on bakkt to become operational for the seamless exchange of $ (and other fiat) and bitcoin.

It is possible, but not very likely (considering the the fact that J. Dorsey "likes" bitcoin) that companies like Square will use btc (in LN form) as an underlying transactional mechanism, yet the user would not notice that they actually use bitcoin. In my opinion, this would be detrimental to the cause.

I still think that prioritizing the use of bitcoin in saving/store of value is likelier to result in bitcoin becoming that first (instead of being a transactional unit).



523. Post 49569264 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Those who are into sci-fi, might be interested to read this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/amgib1/what_happened_to_the_2013_time_travelers_post_a/

and a followup:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/a59o2v/i_am_the_bitcoin_time_traveler_ama/

Also read  "The Toynbee convector" by Ray Bradbury.

There some interesting nuggets there.



524. Post 49570377 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: πΊήζ on February 03, 2019, 06:46:01 PM
Those who are into sci-fi, might be interested to read this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/amgib1/what_happened_to_the_2013_time_travelers_post_a/

and a followup:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/a59o2v/i_am_the_bitcoin_time_traveler_ama/

Also read  "The Toynbee convector" by Ray Bradbury.

There some interesting nuggets there.

The white supremacist Author, or just coincidence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luka_Magnotta
Quote
Things are looking bleak here, and some of you will carry blood on your hands.
Quote
I personally live next to an annoying young.....

bizzaro quotes not reflecting the gist of a piece.
as far as your "sleuthing by google"-how would I know?
I am interested in it only as far as predicting possible futures, nothing more (or less).
If someone's post name is "Da_talking_asshole", you would not think that it is actually a real talking asshole, would you?



525. Post 49603773 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Milky Way (aka our galaxy) is warped or could be called a 'tilted sombrero':

https://apnews.com/0f963341f5b24658b23321900dfc86ce

Bitcoin, on the other hand, is as flat as a pancake.
Not much to see...move along.

Quote from: kingcolex on February 05, 2019, 11:36:06 PM
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2019/02/04/navigating-bitcoin-ethereum-xrp-how-google-is-quietly-making-blockchains-searchable/#4e0acf514248
'In other words, if blockchain is to go mainstream, some of its beloved anonymity features will have to be abandoned.'
Yeah I figured they were building a database of users to addresses or something along those lines.

Why do they need it, I wonder?
I never, ever, bought anything suggested by their ads (or at least I like to think so).



526. Post 49604606 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: bitserve on February 06, 2019, 02:30:11 AM
I can't really affirm he is though, not from his post history... the avatar on the other hand...

Based on my avatar, I am either a plant or a frog.
JS.



527. Post 49604979 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Well, bitcoin is a new form of "life":

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/anllqs/if_bitcoin_is_a_new_form_of_life/



528. Post 49605243 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

I have no idea what half of the conversations here are about.
Will try to parse it again tomorrow.



529. Post 49613524 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.29h):

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 03:14:35 PM
Bearish Murad Tweetstorm

If you are writing some pie in the sky long term predictions while pointing to short term annihilation of the asset that already experienced above 80% decline, than you are:

1. SM club subscriber.
2. Too "smart" for your own good.
3. Want to push asset down to load since you don't have ANY of it.
4. You are named Tone or Murad.

What is the correct answer?



530. Post 49617008 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

Quote from: Torque on February 06, 2019, 05:05:00 PM
Talk like this from murad is what irks others:

Quote from: murad
11/ Inb4 "the bottom is in".
It's not.
2:43 PM - 3 Feb 2019

He's clearly a coward then, just like Tone Vays and other so-called "Crypto Gurus". Because actually calling a bottom puts one's reputation WAY more on the line than saying "the bottom is NOT in". For the latter, there is no repercussion to one's rep for being wrong because your followers didn't really lose anything for taking your advice.

This is why I despise all these type of guys. They are all snake oil selling phonies who truly have no clue.

Exactly. He is clearly a phony, a pretend "bitcoin maximalist", same as the other guy.
Do I know that the bottom is in?
No, but he is just an irritant since apart from his 'chartology', there is NOTHING that predicts what he is saying.



531. Post 49635632 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

Perhaps, current stagnation in btc price predicts large scale deflation?

This argument goes like this:
BTC was a clear market leader in 2017, then it turned around 9-10 mo earlier than the overall market (in US) started correcting.
Incidentally, btc main run roughly corresponded to a period of relatively rapid rates rise, see 5 year rates from July 2016-Dec2017 (rise from 1.2 to 2.4%)
Fed was not able to normalize rates at the usual 4.5-5.5%. They are now neutral at 2.2-2.5%.
Next time there is a recession, these 2-2.5% would either not be enough OR rates would go deep negative.
Deflation is an anathema for all policy-makers. Perhaps, that's why we hear lately so much about GND.
Not going to discuss the merit (especially the taxation levels, lol), but one thing is for sure: it would result in the inflationary stimulus.
Suffice it to say, large account holders (family offices) continue to accumulate bitcoin. They might see deflation coming first (difficulty for the banking system) followed by inflation (difficulty for everyone) afterwards. Bitcoin can play in both scenarios as a SOV and wealth preservation mechanism.
Perhaps, that GND stimulus (even if small portions of the program will ever see the light of the day) would counteract the upcoming deflation pulse that they are so concerned about. BTW, Armstrong also predicts a large bout of deflation, but maybe a bit later.

TL;DR declining and/or stagnating btc price predicts upcoming deflation?



532. Post 49650629 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

Is anybody disgusted with how ALL crypto goes up in unison with bitcoin, as if they are all one and the same?
This has to stop after five years of btc and others being in the public eye.
Ridiculous.



533. Post 49650742 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 09, 2019, 12:28:19 AM
Is anybody disgusted with how ALL crypto goes up in unison with bitcoin, as if they are all on and the same?
This has to stop after five years of btc and others being in the public eye.
Ridiculous.

All crypto is shit except Bitcoin.  This should not come as a surprise to anyone on this board.  Metcalfe’s law, first mover advantage, natural monopoly, schelling point and all that.

Well, sure, I just cannot understand that at a first hint of a positive move, that stuff goes up more, pretty much negating the argument at a first glance.
That's not how coming out of a bear should look like.
A leader or a new leader (when it is appropriate) typically comes out first, sometimes as much as a year early.
I seriously doubt that LTC is a new leader. That would be ridiculous.



534. Post 49650816 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

Might do a preliminary Turbotax run this weekend or next.
Starting to expect something unpleasant:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/2/6/18214039/irs-tax-refund-withholding-trump

With btc down it would be nice to get a refund, but most report less refund or even underpay...we shall see.




535. Post 49651005 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on February 09, 2019, 12:58:40 AM
I think homer should just use that uniform hat.

What is the nomenclature on that Dabs?

It's called a "Pershing Cap" or more generically "Service Cap" ... duckduckgo images shows a bunch.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=pershing+cap

Hey man it suits you very well Wink
Welcome HAT carrier Cheesy

Good gonna save my strenght and dive into my HODLcrib next to me HODLchick
And looking forward to catch Some good wel earned BOOZE tomorrow
Good night WO’s and enjoy the sparkling green for NOW its here Cheesy

Edit: btw I think I can handle sales very well 1K burgers only today NOW what about that
Still for tech bitserve.... I think I can really learn from almost every regular poster of the WO thread
But I Will do my best always
.............

And F*** even my girl can do Some programming Smiley

The best place for anyone who is good at sales is, without a doubt, the good ol' USA.
Good salespersons are one of the most important people in most companies, because...they bring in the dough.
Compensation usually follows.

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 09, 2019, 01:11:39 AM
I’m telling him to get a basic level of skill so he can work in the tech industry.

I have to hire people with tech skills and wages are through the roof right now because the particular skill set is so damn rare you have to grow your own, and then your competitors steal them. 

Autists with tech skills are easy to find.  People skills people who can’t do tech are easy to find.   People skills people with tech skills are extremely valuable.

Bingo!



536. Post 49651215 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

An interesting point from Pomp:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/aoms2f/people_are_going_to_be_so_shook_when_the_wealthy/

Quote
People are going to be so shook when the wealthy of tomorrow are the Bitcoiners of today

Would not bother me one bit.
Rewatched the "Social network" recently.
Was Eduardo worthy the current $9bil, most of which is probably the facebook stock?
He wasn't even with the company apart from the initial short stint there, "immortalized" by the movie.
His initial $1000, then 19K contribution was probably one of the best investments done by anyone, EVER.
All random, of course.

Therefore, if some schmuck (or genius  Grin) bought 20K bitcoin in 2010 for $3k bucks, so be it.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/software-engineer-buys-20000-btc-in-2010-quits-job-to-travel-around-globe

I remember seeing historical reddit posts where someone was selling 10K btc for $25 or something like this (maybe $50, cannot find it now).

Even 1-10BTC might be very serious money later on since an average $$ millionaire can get only 0.3 btc (or less).



537. Post 49681825 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 10, 2019, 09:19:41 PM


Not sure what to make of it.
Does he think that it is over already?
If not, than there was no event like the blowup of two Bear Stearns hedge funds (in 2007) yet.
We shall see.



538. Post 49682127 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on February 10, 2019, 09:55:32 PM
Wonder what the chances of breaking $4,000 this week are?

I think when we finally get above $6,000 again (whenever that is) we can call that the very early beginning of the next bull run. I think we’ll break $6,000 towards the end of 2019. It’d be great if we climb slowly towards that figure. I’d love to be able to buy another 4 or 5 bitcoin’s before it gets to the stage where it might be unaffordable to buy whole one’s again.

As usual gentlemen please make sure you’re accumulating now. These prices will be laughed at in a couple of years. Total once in a lifetime opportunity now to set yourselves up forever as financially comfortable.

Go BTC Go !!!!!!

Edit - BTW, I’m sorry for being disloyal gentlemen but I bought some GRIN a couple of hours ago.

Watch out for the day when 1BTC exceeds 1BRK-A.
That would be a cause for celebration.
What are our chances within the next 10 years?
re grin; if Charlie would be able to incorporate that tech into ltc, I say that chances are better than even that it would be incorporated into btc (at some point, maybe as a sidechain).



539. Post 49683272 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

murad's gibberish
doom prophet, fake long term bull
he is annoying



540. Post 49683971 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

Quote from: StartupAnalyst on February 11, 2019, 01:26:15 AM
[edited out]
What would you say about these pictures?

Even though 1 would be the easiest to see on a hat avatar, and I really don't know anything about the actual character, my personal preference, based on just the cool bad-ass leather jacket and sunglasses appeal of the underlying image is 3, 1, 2.... as I have reordered them below to disambiguate.  

By the way, I don't really appreciate the split-personality feeling that I get from image 2... that is why I put that one last in my avatar image preference order.

№3

№1                                                                                                                                            

№2

Thank you for the detailed answer! Honestly, I also like the third one more, and I'm also afraid that the first one will be very poorly visible on the hat Cry

yeah,#3 and #1 are both good, but too dark in appearance.



541. Post 49684003 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.30h):

Quote from: jbreher on February 11, 2019, 01:40:36 AM
https://twitter.com/brian_trollz/status/1094673219968253955
thread oh about the next UASF
nb it's not just Lukejr advocating

Frickin' lunacy.

maybe we should just stay away from any more changes in the blocksize, for chrissake!
that goes for both parties.



542. Post 49713315 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.31h):

This shows that Solskjaer is not a Champions league team manager yet.
He might not get a job and they might go for Zidane+$200-300 mil expenditure instead.

Re next peak.
IMHO, it makes sense to sell some at $18-22K just in case this double tops even if it is unlikely.
I expected 28K last time due to some BETI "numerology" (described somewhere on bitcointalk).
We got thwarted by the futures.

Next time, i will be selling (maybe 5-10% of the total) progressively.
Sell a little at 22K, then if we go into sharp rise, start selling at around 50-100K and do it mechanically every 20-50K.
Say, a 50K, 100K, 150K, etc. or a variation thereof.



543. Post 49728061 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.31h):

The biggest question I ponder with regards to bitcoin is the following:

Right now the only way to benefit from bitcoin appreciation is to sell it (or exchange for goods).
There are no cash flows that you can get from simply holding btc.
I know that it is from design, but would have preferred to have some income from btc holding.
Otherwise, the only way is to sell, which most people detest.
Getting cash loans in lieu of btc is super risky because of btc volatility.
Who wants to get a loan at 30% value, then get liquidated on a 83% "correction".
I wonder if some legit services will develop which can give you an "interest" (even a small one) on your btc.



544. Post 49728083 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.31h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on February 13, 2019, 07:59:16 PM
I'm in some very odd state with the universe at present - I think this is the first time I'm going to nail a call for the WO price prediction poll, like, ever...

what was it?



545. Post 49728194 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.31h):

Quote from: Globb0 on February 13, 2019, 08:18:33 PM
The biggest question I ponder with regards to bitcoin is the following:

Right now the only way to benefit from bitcoin appreciation is to sell it (or exchange for goods).
There are no cash flows that you can get from simply holding btc.
I know that it is from design, but would have preferred to have some income from btc holding.
Otherwise, the only way is to sell, which most people detest.
Getting cash loans in lieu of btc is super risky because of btc volatility.
Who wants to get a loan at 30% value, then get liquidated on a 83% "correction".
I wonder if some legit services will develop which can give you an "interest" (even a small one) on your btc.

Funny I was thinking this earlier in terms of fungibility.

The interest you get from the bank is so they can use your money while you aren't right?

If a service was made to centrally hold bitcoin securely so you don't have to worry, it wouldn't risk the fund at all just cold storage as a promise.

But then, what? no interest?? in fact the opposite, how much will you pay per year for bitcoin fort knox. With guaranteed 1 for 1 you own it coins?

Some percent a year?



Yes, good one, but imagine a situation where you are a middle class guy/gal with a bitcoin stash from 2012 (not me, I bought much later  Grin).
You suddenly got 5, 10, 20 mil $$ in 2021-2025 from your 20 btc that you bought for a couple of hundred $$.
You still got no cash...
The size of your stash would probably cause you to sell a large %%, then try to explain where the immense hoard of $$ come from.
Retain good records, lol.



546. Post 49730361 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.31h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on February 13, 2019, 09:14:09 PM
From the mouths of children another wake up call. Who is listening?

TED talks w/ Greta Thunberg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2QxFM9y0tY


will play a pivotal roll in the coming changes that are necessary to transition off this destructive oil based economy and into a sustainable environmentally friendly one.

she is a child and speak like a child...
Do we mess up nature...sure we do.
However, ask whether people of Sweden (or anywhere else) will give up their meat and their warm winter flats, etc etc in a noble goal of reducing emissions (with a big maybe), and you would hear a resounding NO.

Realistically, i see only two possibilities:
1. We will continue with population growth, pollution, environmental destruction until we would be too stupid to even comprehend the consequences (CO2 levels twice above normal reduce your intellect by 20%).
Why we would continue? because our lifespan is too short to comprehend the change that occurs over relatively long time periods (more than 30-50 years) and act on this in a democratic society with no dominating opinion.
Once we self-destruct en masse, Earth will return to semi-balance within 100 thou years, maximum a million, only to become unlivable (due to expanding Sun) in about 1 billion years.
BTW, I can see the effects of current civilization first hand. Most current students have significantly decreased levels of comprehension, critical thinking, analysis, etc. Maybe not true for Stanford, but certainly true in some run of the mill schools. The process of "idiocratization" is well on its way.
Can worldwide tech civilization sprung again after the survivors become smarter again following the crisis? Unlikely, since we already consumed vast %% of coal and oil.
This probably explains the Fermi paradox: there is nobody out there because it is impossible (or close to impossible) to solve this problem of civilization vs environmental destruction/pollution. This is proposed to be a Great Filter which presumably prevents civilization to continue over cosmically long time periods.

2. We would become non-biological, which would render Co2 levels moot. In such case, we would probably consume the biosphere or utilize their carbon for something else. Horrible?
Maybe, but it is my less favorable scenario.



547. Post 49748141 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.31h):

I was doing some simple math:

17.54 mil btc per 7.7 bil Earth inhabitants (lets forget about lost coins for this calculation):

0.00226btc/person

To be a 1% bitcoiner among earthlings you only need no more than 0.226 BTC (probably less, but I will use this number), which is about $814 right now.
I would think that any intelligent person should go ahead and make that purchase, it makes sense, even if you are skeptical.

Conclusion: btc is still super affordable.
In fiat world you need $871K (in assets) to be among 1% worldwide.



548. Post 49748203 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.31h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 15, 2019, 05:00:20 AM

Things that make you go hmmmmm


exactly

the same a-holes might be playing the same games with two (or probably more) different coins, that's all.



549. Post 49760710 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Get some TM

Get just 0.226 BTC and you will be among top 1% of possible btc holders*.

*assuming that btc will be wildly accepted and EVERYONE will have some of it.


PS

I am not saying that 0.226 will make you a top 1% of current btc holders (to be 1% among current holders you need about 15BTC).
Top 1% in fiat (by wealth) have just $871K according to Credit Suisse, so invest at least $814 (0.226 BTC), then do nothing.
If btc would "consume" fiat, then you are golden, or rather "bitcoined".

I might send this simple message to some of my no-coiner friends.
If they ignore it now...oh, well.
$814 is a sum most people in OECD countries can afford to "invest" on a risky venture.



550. Post 49761033 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: infofront on February 15, 2019, 10:00:20 PM
This shit is not breaking down. Big money is buying. They are patient. It will creep up till ETF approval on 31/03. Bakkt will come when we least expect. Big alts will push up. Retail will prick up its ears. Hats will happily be eaten. Resistance is futile.



The 2019/2020 consolidation phase in Bitcoin will be the most commonly anticipated, predicted and understood consolidation phase in history.

Well, that might have been the $6500 flat. Almost everyone thought that it was the bottom. Surprise, surprise.
Will this waterfall repeat in this cycle? It could, but I doubt it.



551. Post 49761658 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on February 15, 2019, 10:36:11 PM
survived the damn first two episodes
but the GF is happy
good points Micg

episodes of what?
sorry pal, perhaps I missed a que.

Quote from: El duderino_ on February 15, 2019, 10:39:30 PM


https://twitter.com/sthenc/status/1096140805218004992

twitteraties keep posting it, but the fella (character, of course) was shot soon afterwards.



552. Post 49762166 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 15, 2019, 11:59:04 PM
Hmmm what you recommend I try to get my wife to watch?   Something like Game of Thrones would be good.

"Counterpart"...a bit brainy and dark (weird premise, but I kind of dig it).
Shows how a single decision can upend your life.
Minimalist acting, which EU/UK folks may like, episodes shot in Berlin and Los Angeles (the latter location was a surprise to me).

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 16, 2019, 12:12:58 AM
Night Mic

I've heard 'The Wire' is quite good.

And 'The West Wing'

But I'm not quite up to date.

Ok might try those. Also season 2 of West World.

Sorry, not season 2 of Westworld for my taste.
Too much "cranberry syrup".



553. Post 49763122 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

if nntaleb likes bitcoin, does it mean that Universa 'likes' it too?
murad is panicking.
lol



554. Post 49778490 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

when rain continues
'tis hard to philosophize
on heaven's weather



555. Post 49790614 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on February 17, 2019, 04:36:58 PM
Actually age is degradation in the cells.

When you are younger they regenerate fine.

The challenge is to halt or reverse this degradation.

I believe there are current successful studies, stimulating the repair function back into order.




That's the whole "senescent cells" approach. Basically tries to kill senescent cells (cells that stop dividing) which accumulate with age. Human trials are starting this year by the way.

I know a bit about this approach, called senolytics. One problem is that aging is not considered a disease, so companies have to pursue some aging effects indirectly.
However, senolytics do not significantly increase the lifespan (so far), but they do affect the 'healthspan'. In animal trials, older mice became more healthy, but the average life duration was not affected. There were similar preliminary results (first part) in a first pre-clinical human trial.

A typical senolytic cocktail includes desatinib and quercetin.
Medical grade desatinib is expensive and is an anti-cancer drug needing prescription, so, personally, I decided not to bother with sourcing it for a simple reason that we would probably have something better (less toxic) in 5-10 years.
Quercetin, on the other hand, is readily available, is a naturally occurring molecule (present in apple's peels and in blueberries), so i did try it for a month, which is what one clinical trial did.
No discernible effects one way or another, apart from feeling slightly better (a bit more "robust"), but, of course, I did not do a proper study, so it could be purely psychological.
I would probably pause for a month and do it again. Three weeks on D+Q was the duration of the first human trial, so i also used a similar time frame (without D).



556. Post 49790771 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: Pamoldar on February 17, 2019, 01:30:21 PM
LOL:

Quote
Websites banned in China as of February, 2019:

- Google Search
- Yahoo
- Facebook
- YouTube
- Wikipedia (Chinese)
- Twitter
- Netflix
- Reddit
- Instagram
- Tumblr
- WhatsApp
- BBC
- New York Times
- The Independent
Do they have internet anymore 😛

They have tencent (literally) in a form of wechat.




557. Post 49791871 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on February 17, 2019, 06:59:58 PM
But I am special and different goddammit and the human race will be poorer if I were to die. Ever.

like this: "I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain..."

Oh, well, but let's fight for it, although chances are slim.



558. Post 49792161 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on February 17, 2019, 07:09:18 PM
Massive clinical trials for anti-aging are taking place atm..here is one off the top of my head. I think there is a real possibility that we could be one of the last generations to die.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30616998

https://www.sciencealert.com/experimental-anti-aging-treatment-that-kills-old-cells-has-passed-first-human-trial

That's the study i was talking about somewhere above, but it is just a start.
Personally, I don't like SENS and A. de Gray. Too much ideology and too little actual science.
However, extending life as a gradual process appeals to me.
Extended 10 years, then during these years, maybe something that extends 20 years would be found, etc, etc.

I would gladly dispose of most of my crypto (mostly btc) if there is a reliable, albeit expensive treatment, but only under a condition that it is a 'healthspan".
It only makes sense if you feel and look younger.



559. Post 49792201 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 17, 2019, 07:21:57 PM
Life preservation.
It's lobsters, all the way down.
Need more telomeres.



motherfucker...1sm

telomers would not solve anything, you would get more cancer as a side effect (a fact).



560. Post 49792274 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: kingcolex on February 17, 2019, 07:12:40 PM
Massive clinical trials for anti-aging are taking place atm..here is one off the top of my head. I think there is a real possibility that we could be one of the last generations to die.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30616998

https://www.sciencealert.com/experimental-anti-aging-treatment-that-kills-old-cells-has-passed-first-human-trial
Man wasn't meant to live forever, we don't need a 1000 year reigning Nero.

it's funny for you to say that.
Wasn't Methuselah 969 year old when he died, according to Genesis (5:27).



561. Post 49793997 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on February 17, 2019, 07:43:42 PM
telomers would not solve anything, you would get more cancer as a side effect (a fact).

AFAIK, only causes cancer once the "original protective" telomeres have been naturally degraded.

Theoretically, a solution can be found if there is a way to bio-engineer a way to do this in-utero or as a "vaccine" upon birth.

it could, but short telomers are mostly associated with aging.
The most relevant quote is this:
Quote
Although tumors may arise from cells with short telomeres and chromosomal instability, telomerase activation and telomere maintenance are requisites for the progression of most human tumor types.

If you are into this stuff, here is an excellent review (with free access):
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896987/




562. Post 49794794 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on February 17, 2019, 10:43:05 PM
Also check out Metformin, a diabetes pill that is now under testing for prolonging life.
https://www.wired.com/story/this-pill-promises-to-extend-life-for-a-nickel-a-pop/
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02432287

yeah...watch out if they will find something positive...immediately the price would go from 5c to $100-1k a pill.
It would be worth it, right?
I remember how during the first swine flu the cost of a weekly dose of tamiflu went from $10-20 to $300 or higher on the internet (local pharmacies were out for months).
It was worth it as well, just as $20 per btc tx was in December of 2017. People went crazy trying to get in the block immediately.



563. Post 49795192 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on February 17, 2019, 11:18:05 PM
Also check out Metformin, a diabetes pill that is now under testing for prolonging life.
https://www.wired.com/story/this-pill-promises-to-extend-life-for-a-nickel-a-pop/
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02432287

yeah...watch out if they will find something positive...immediately the price would go from 5c to $100-1k a pill.
It would be worth it, right?
I remember how during the first swine flu the cost of a weekly dose of tamiflu went from $10-20 to $300 or higher on the internet (local pharmacies were out for months).
It was worth it as well, just as $20 per btc tx was in December of 2017. People went crazy trying to get in the block immediately.

Not a problem if you get it on a prescription where I live (max price for meds is  240ish USD per 12 month period, some, like insulin, are no cost.


yeah, not sure what is better since you probably paid the last 40 years for it in higher taxes.
Once you are old(er), I agree that the fixed price med cost is the best, but our respective countries are set up in a way that precludes 'jumping ship" and enjoying what is more advantageous to you when you want it, right?
I had japanese friends in US and they all told me that US is better for younger people with more chances to advance over the "old guard", but they all wanted to go back when they are older because of more respect for older generation in Japan. US varies in different regions too.



564. Post 49808189 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: Cryptoqueeen on February 18, 2019, 01:00:48 PM
What do vegans have against eating eggs though? IF the chickens were kept in a wide place outside, ate healthy food, and were not abused in any way?

Chickens lay eggs regardless of if fertilised or not. So whats the problem?

If you only stop eating meat, you are a: Pescotarian. (That’s what Mic & me are)
And really I didn’t push him, he feels sorry for the animals.


Right. There is also pesca-pescatarian...
https://youtu.be/IC-ZBJ-Kw2E?t=25

jk

I am cool with any diet (as long as I don't have to be convinced otherwise), same as religion.
Once it starts to involve moral issues, it's a slippery slope.

BTW, some cholesterol is good for you.
A couple of examples:
1. Without cholesterol your cells' membranes would freeze during winter like butter in the freezer, resulting in an effect similar to liquid N2 treated terminator (in T2).
2. Without cholesterol, men would get no testosterone and females no estrogen, which would be a bummer.



565. Post 49808745 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on February 18, 2019, 07:01:34 PM

... and with 100% more KYC paperwork before purchase outside of China !

plus 27.6% tax in US, which makes it a nonstarter for anyone with more than 5c/kwh.



566. Post 49811745 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 19, 2019, 12:13:28 AM
I should probably write $5,500 and not $5,5000

55000 would be nice, though.
micg is writing responses so fast that one have difficulty correcting typos  Grin



567. Post 49812098 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

@HM

Do you think that it is possible that very soon (maybe they are doing it already) AI would have close to perfect market predictions?

I saw this article about protein folding. Best scientists were beaten by AI with a large margin.
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/2/15/18226493/deepmind-alphafold-artificial-intelligence-protein-folding

Interesting points there: will scientists (apart from those programming AI maybe) become obsolete?
A large part of doing science is based on being able to stake the claim that you did something first (discovery, etc.).
Personally, I don't see much use of doing science of you are doing so at some primitive level when AI gets all the "best parts".
This would feel awful.
There will be a crisis (maybe limited to natural sciences, though).
We could be already in it and will realize it soon.



568. Post 49826623 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: becoin on February 19, 2019, 06:29:14 PM
Probably because ETH is moving from a POW (proof of work) to a PoS (proof of stake) consensus algorithm with a minimum of 32 ETH required to stake, and a lot of people are buying it at these low prices so that they can start staking soon

This has been said for forever, still nothing. I doubt anything will change.

LOL.
POW is where workers rule.
POS is where rent seekers rule.
You can never create sustainable economy where rent seekers rule!
Ethereum was created as a coin of the people that don't understand monetary theory by the people that don't understand monetary theory for the people that don't understand monetary theory!


I agree, however, I worry that current rent seekers (which are dominant in the current economy) will simply transplant themselves onto POS, thereby strengthening it.



569. Post 49826699 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

CL: two stadiums full of people who paid good money plus hundreds of million people watching this on TV and all they got was 0:0.
Happy that I did not watch it (this time).



570. Post 49828126 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 20, 2019, 02:16:26 AM
Probably because ETH is moving from a POW (proof of work) to a PoS (proof of stake) consensus algorithm with a minimum of 32 ETH required to stake, and a lot of people are buying it at these low prices so that they can start staking soon

This has been said for forever, still nothing. I doubt anything will change.

LOL.
POW is where workers rule.
POS is where rent seekers rule.
You can never create sustainable economy where rent seekers rule!
Ethereum was created as a coin of the people that don't understand monetary theory by the people that don't understand monetary theory for the people that don't understand monetary theory!


I agree, however, I worry that current rent seekers (which are dominant in the current economy) will simply transplant themselves onto POS, thereby strengthening it.


On an individual level maybe you hedge some of your value into that situation, but if you recognize the true value as POW, and you largely invest in POW, then likely you are going to experience value appreciation in your POW investment.  The snake oil salesmen are not likely going to make it easy for you to distinguish the real value from the snake oil, right?



hey, do you mine btc or did you ever mine or run a node?
if yes, then kudos, and if not, then you are riding someone else's train here, I am sorry to say.
In order to support btc network (POW) by mining you have to have roughly one S9 (13.5 TH/s) per each 5 BTC that you might have (at this very moment).

Anything else, and you are contributing less than your claim on the network, therefore some third party have more power (you relinquished that power to them). Contribution via node is less clear, but could be calculated as a derivative of the total node number.

If you simply buy and hodl, sorry, you have a claim on something you don't really control in any way.

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 20, 2019, 02:34:33 AM
POS gets shook out real fast once stakers realize the value of their stake is falling faster than the value of the income. Stakers start progressively dumping their stakes at market.   It then becomes a self sustaining whirlpool of doom

POS is an excellent way to get WTF pwned during the next bear cycle.  

True, personally, i see POW as superior, albeit some were also extending ideas about POW collapse if btc prices would get too low as difficulty adjustment happens only roughly 13 days or so.
I see POS as psychologically attractive to financiers because they understand the concept of a "stake" very well.
However, all software or policies implementations of POS so far were mostly flawed.
The problem of ETH is that they think like a central bank and keep jerking the network params one way or another. The problem of EOS is centralization.
Both are no good long term, which is good for POW, but i am not sure that "perfect" (one and done, without jerking the network) POS is theoretically impossible, but maybe it is.



571. Post 49828380 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

cannot quote ^^^it properly.
It's not mining elitism, it is how it works since Satoshi made it public.
If you think that owning btc makes you or anyone else a contributor, no it does not (in a POW system), but it does in a POS system where you mine using your stake.
IN POW system miners and node-owners control the system.
Simply owning btc is OK, but you are effectively cut off out of all decision making that might affect your btc.
This is just a statement of fact, nothing personal.



572. Post 49828422 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 20, 2019, 03:38:26 AM
cannot quote ^^^it properly.
It's not mining elitism, it is how it works since Satoshi made it public.
If you think that owning btc makes you or anyone else a contributor, no it does not (in a POW system), but it does in a POS system where you mine using your stake.
IN POW system miners and node-owners control the system.
Simply owning btc is OK, but you are effectively cut off out of all decision making that might affect your btc.
This is just a statement of fact, nothing personal.


You are taking a technology centric view and ignoring economic soft power.  UASF proved the strength of economic hodlers.  Don't get fooled by Bcash propaganda that miners vote.  They can just fork off and take their hashpower elsewhere and good luck to them.

UASF proved the power of users with nodes, NOT the hodlers. Hodlers were totally out of the loop and were not in the decision making.
In fact, economic powers such as coinbase and barry silbert's fund were not able to do anything because nodes said (indirectly) that they will go with the core and it was not economical for miners to go and do a split.
They would have been losing many millions a day. It is a bit funny that you are indirectly arguing for POS (power to hodlers) while saying that POW is better. No paradox here?

"UASF stands for User Activated Soft Fork.
It’s a mechanism where the activation time of a soft fork occurs on a specified date enforced by full nodes; a concept sometimes referred to as the economic majority."
https://cointelegraph.com/explained/uasf-vs-uahf-explained

"The network is robust in its unstructured simplicity. Nodes work all at once with little coordination. They do not need to be identified, since messages are not routed to any particular place and only need to be delivered on a best effort basis. Nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. They vote with their CPU power, expressing their acceptance of valid blocks by working on extending them and rejecting invalid blocks by refusing to work on them. Any needed rules and incentives can be enforced with this consensus mechanism." by Satoshi N.



573. Post 49828688 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 20, 2019, 04:11:38 AM
cannot quote ^^^it properly.
It's not mining elitism, it is how it works since Satoshi made it public.
If you think that owning btc makes you or anyone else a contributor, no it does not (in a POW system), but it does in a POS system where you mine using your stake.
IN POW system miners and node-owners control the system.
Simply owning btc is OK, but you are effectively cut off out of all decision making that might affect your btc.
This is just a statement of fact, nothing personal.


You are taking a technology centric view and ignoring economic soft power.  UASF proved the strength of economic hodlers.  Don't get fooled by Bcash propaganda that miners vote.  They can just fork off and take their hashpower elsewhere and good luck to them.

UASF proved the power of users with nodes, NOT the hodlers. Hodlers were totally out of the loop and were not in the decision making.
In fact, economic powers such as coinbase and barry silbert's fund were not able to do anything because nodes said (indirectly) that they will go with the core and it was not economical for miners to go and do a split.
They would have been losing many millions a day. It is a bit funny that you are indirectly arguing for POS (power to hodlers) while saying that POW is better. No paradox here?

"UASF stands for User Activated Soft Fork.
It’s a mechanism where the activation time of a soft fork occurs on a specified date enforced by full nodes; a concept sometimes referred to as the economic majority."
https://cointelegraph.com/explained/uasf-vs-uahf-explained

"The network is robust in its unstructured simplicity. Nodes work all at once with little coordination. They do not need to be identified, since messages are not routed to any particular place and only need to be delivered on a best effort basis. Nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. They vote with their CPU power, expressing their acceptance of valid blocks by working on extending them and rejecting invalid blocks by refusing to work on them. Any needed rules and incentives can be enforced with this consensus mechanism." by Satoshi N.

Cutting through all of it, the miners will follow the money, because they have to follow the money.  They have to pay electricity expenses (which is in sharp contrast to POS where stakers pay nothing - hence the nothing at stake problem even if Vitalik thinks it doesn't apply - he's wrong)

I concede that if you have a large financial stake in Bitcoin and are not running a full node, then you are a fool.  

But in this case, economic soft power and nodes are aligned.  

Nicely put.



574. Post 49829419 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.32h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 20, 2019, 05:17:08 AM
...for some folks to be suggesting that BTC hodler/accumulators have to engage in a certain kind of behavior such as mining or node running in order to either be full-fledged bitcoin citizen or a prudent bitcoin actor.

you can be a prudent bitcoin actor by holding btc.
you cannot be a bitcoin citizen (which votes) without mining and/or node running.

extending your analogy a bit, those who simply hodl could be compared to US green card holders: basically all (or almost all) rights, but NO voting rights.



575. Post 49837789 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: Globb0 on February 20, 2019, 10:54:43 AM
...for some folks to be suggesting that BTC hodler/accumulators have to engage in a certain kind of behavior such as mining or node running in order to either be full-fledged bitcoin citizen or a prudent bitcoin actor.

you can be a prudent bitcoin actor by holding btc.
you cannot be a bitcoin citizen (which votes) without mining and/or node running.

extending your analogy a bit, those who simply hodl could be compared to US green card holders: basically all (or almost all) rights, but NO voting rights.


You are wrong. You can vote with your feet.

If you don't like something you can dump all the coins.



That's not voting, this is like having a fit of rage in a public place.
It would have ZERO affect on bitcoin protocol.
Ver did it, Bitmain did it-all for nothing. Their dumping did not affect btc at all, only made it stronger.



576. Post 49841320 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: gentlemand on February 20, 2019, 08:29:00 PM
Samsung Galaxy S10 Unpacked: cryptocurrency wallet features finally unveiled

It looks like a hardware wallet indeed.

with a tiny-weenie backdoor?



577. Post 49843208 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on February 20, 2019, 11:35:38 PM
Have Fun watching them

 BTW, I had no idea your partner was so fucking based.

 I can respect the idea that you are averse to marriage, but don't lose this one, broheim.

 You have snagged yourself a very special woman.

 Treat her well.

He can't eat meat ...

yeah, a vegetarian gf pretty much makes you a vegetarian..
https://youtu.be/O_eVV7bbZtU?t=14

that said, smart outspoken women are cool.



578. Post 49859654 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on February 21, 2019, 10:56:56 PM


I agree with a point that a show called "penis monologues" would never exist because it would be considered cringe-worthy.
"Vagina monologues" also sound silly (to me), albeit I usually pay no attention to this whatsoever (apart from this post).

Quote from: El duderino_ on February 21, 2019, 11:47:34 PM
@600watt @p_shep @marcus_of_augustus @etc (for WO regulars)

Still no HAT request @XhomerX

Thats insanity, big time Roll Eyes

easy, man, or you would be considered a "hat-cult" leader  Grin.



579. Post 49859728 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 21, 2019, 11:53:35 PM


I agree with a point that a show called "penis monologues" would never exist because it would be considered cringe-worthy.
"Vagina monologues" also sound silly (to me), albeit I usually pay no attention to this whatsoever (apart from this post).

Just sayin



Well, at least there is no monologue ...aka it is a silent (or grunting) dick play.
This I can understand  Cheesy



580. Post 49873955 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: Cryptotourist on February 22, 2019, 10:10:44 PM
The Universe is female in nature Ibian. It gives birth to things.


Debatable, but OK.
But, if you put is this way, then what is impregnating the Universe?



581. Post 49874106 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on February 22, 2019, 10:26:42 PM
Dec 31st, 2020.
Who would like this man to be right?? Roll Eyes
I hope he is wrong and it gets delayed to Jan 2nd and save me a ton of taxes.

About 5 years too early in the best possible bull scenario

Meh, what’s 5 years in a lifetime. You will still find me here talking shit, annoying people Smiley

i'm already in LOVE with HM's 260K-ish prediction and the bottom being in etc


Well, the problem would be when to sell if and when we get to somewhere between 100K and 1 mil.
it would suck to sell a bit at 100K if 1000k (a mil) is following closely.
In 2017 the price was both $800 and close to $20K, almost a 25-fold difference.
Therefore, it is entirely possible (although not likely) that both 100K and 1000K would happen in the same cycle.
Some mechanistic approach might be in order.



582. Post 49875727 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: yefi on February 23, 2019, 01:27:52 AM
Well, the problem would be when to sell if and when we get to somewhere between 100K and 1 mil.
it would suck to sell a bit at 100K if 1000k (a mil) is following closely.
In 2017 the price was both $800 and close to $20K, almost a 25-fold difference.
Therefore, it is entirely possible (although not likely) that both 100K and 1000K would happen in the same cycle.
Some mechanistic approach might be in order.

Seven figures, inflation notwithstanding, is surely decades away if it does happen. We can't just hype our way to a valuation greater than the world's major stock markets. That kind of money will require more pedestrian and sustained growth - a new era for price development.

A phase transition from fiat to btc/crypto might happen and would be much faster than "decades".
Many people are penciling in the next ATH in 2021 at $100-400K.
The ATH after that could be projected to occur in 2025 at $1mil or thereabout.
Granted, this would require a large scale abandonment of fiat in favor of bitcoin/crypto.
Can it happen? Perhaps.



583. Post 49885542 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: Hueristic on February 23, 2019, 04:29:03 PM

Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway loses $4.3 billion in single day on Kraft Heinz plunge
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/22/warren-buffetts-berkshire-hathaway-loses-more-than-3-billion-in-single-day-on-kraft-heinz-plunge.html

Haha, maybe everyone will stop worshiping that POS now.

At 88 it is probably a good time to retire from active portfolio management.
Quite a number of flops lately.



584. Post 49899841 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

nice while it lasted
fortune's arrows fall again
bitcoin would be fine



585. Post 49899884 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: kingcolex on February 24, 2019, 03:45:49 PM
Had to make a call to set the record straight. Sorry for the wall.

Gave a merit, but I apparently an confused I thought you were MicGoosens girlfriend. Your father calling you so makes me thing I am mistaking users.

Crypto-queen (the gf) vs Crypto-tourist (unknown affiliation, probably none).



586. Post 49901376 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: bitserve on February 24, 2019, 05:17:36 PM
Look at the order books. A single whale could debart this shit singlehandely. But I guess they are trying to figure out who was the asshole that dumped.... and if he will do it again.

probably mt gox bankruptcy trustee again, being an a-hole.



587. Post 49901686 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: VB1001 on February 24, 2019, 05:31:19 PM


2019 with 2014.

https://twitter.com/MustStopMurad/status/1099711970251542529

He is only posting what supports his thesis, trying to fit a round peg into a square hole.
Why he even considered a bitcoin proponent? He is not, apart from posting pie-in-the-sky prognosis about 100 years from now.
bleh



588. Post 49901929 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on February 24, 2019, 05:48:17 PM
paul smith shoe's brother


bro, can we stop with re-posting the glorious piss pics?
One was enough, TMI, sorry.



589. Post 49904705 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.33h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on February 24, 2019, 08:56:33 PM
Slow accumulation of bitcoins followed by sudden dump is definitely price suppression technique. The more they use it to suppress price the sharper will be price rise! Don't fall in the psychological trap manipulators are crafting! Don't sell your bitcoins if price is below $50,000!


You won’t see me selling a single satoshi under $50,000. Patience is required here, if you can’t stand the heat, get the fuck out of the kitchen.
Weak hands - not permitted!


Why not send some fiat to exchange, then buy stuff with btc, then replace it by spending fiat.
Sometimes it makes sense, buying miners, for example.
Spending is OK, but spending and replacing is better. You could even be tactical about it.



590. Post 49921524 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on February 25, 2019, 09:08:28 PM
Bitcoin is ingenious - warren buffet

Watch for yourself

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win

@APompliano

https://twitter.com/xtdisnkfe/status/1100037382429011969?s=21

Warren Buffet (or someone like him or who would be his descendant at the BH)

1. it is rat poison.

2. it is ingenious, but bitcoin is not needed, it is an illusion.

3. Meh

4. It's OK, but I am not interested as it has no staying/market power (that's what he said about MSFT, AAPL, AMZN investment in early 2000s).

5. "Let me get in right now at $500K/btc, here is a check for $50bil." Sells at 750K because of "some other opportunity", crashes the price to 550K.



591. Post 49946294 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 27, 2019, 02:35:28 AM
Our glorious overlords apparently have not filled their bags enough yet so feel the need to push the price back downwards. I believe this trend will continue for a month or so until right before Consensus. Where miraculously bitcoin and shitcoin alike will again start to gravitate upwards towards new yearly highs.

All dramatics aside(or maybe this should read to fully embrace the drama), I think the basic problem is still the battle of forks between btc and bch and btcsv. Every time one trys to pump their coins there is an almost immediate dump to drive prices back down and vice versa.

Its really getting quite old dont you think? It is really quite striking to watch this technological wonder grow yet not have a shred of confidence in its price due to the actions of a few. Same as it ever was. #dyor

Nah.  We are supposed to track sideways until October 2019.  No manipulation required.



With all due respect, why are we supposed to repeat prior flat mo for mo?
Every bull and bear in btc so far was different, albeit they "rhymed" in decline %.
For example 2013 double pop (from $12 to $250, then sharp decline into $45, then $1160 peak) was not repeated in 2018-2019.
It is reasonable to suggest that flat may last longer, but i see no "need" for it to last until October.



592. Post 49952146 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 27, 2019, 08:38:22 PM
With all due respect, why are we supposed to repeat prior flat mo for mo?

So far, at a macro level, it matches almost exactly.  Don’t ask me why, I just work here.

Everyone expected a plunge in January because it would be the same as in 2015, but it happened in December instead, so not really almost exactly.
I grant you that there is some similarity so far, but IMHO, this would go away soon.



593. Post 49953322 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: bitserve on February 28, 2019, 12:19:34 AM
With all due respect, why are we supposed to repeat prior flat mo for mo?

So far, at a macro level, it matches almost exactly.  Don’t ask me why, I just work here.

Everyone expected a plunge in January because it would be the same as in 2015, but it happened in December instead, so not really almost exactly.
I grant you that there is some similarity so far, but IMHO, this would go away soon.

One of the bigger differences will probably be that the next bull run won't be as much explosive as the previous ones. Otherwise Bitcoin would reach a ridiculous price... something I don't think will happen with just one single bull run. The curve must tend to gradually flatten. How much? Noone knows.

We keep declining above 80% (84-94%) after each peak, however, we increase smaller and smaller % in each cycle.
This would result in a lower low after a couple of cycles.
If the decreasing trend in X-factor increase of each peak (X36 to X17 to X8 to X3.76 to X1.77; bold numbers indicate what already happened) is followed by about 84% plunge each time, then btc would peak at about 595K and then starts declining with lower lows for both peak and trough each time 595K (peak) to 95K (trough), then 95K to 168K (peak), then 168K to 27K (trough), etc.



594. Post 49980852 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on March 01, 2019, 11:45:17 PM
IMHO its too early to break out of the high $3k  - $4k range.  Am inclined to think we will be around this range until mid year.  

What about:

Late March - early April up to weekly MA20 ($4.1k)
Late April - early May down to weekly MA200 ($3.5k)
Late June - early July up to weekly MA50 ($5-$5.5k)
Early to mid August down to weekly MA200 ($4k)
Early to mid October breakout above all 3 MAs ($4.5k)
Late October - early Nov short term peak ($6k-$9k) before normalizing above $6K and growing further.

Plausible.
Interestingly, there is one pertinent tradeview post (not mine) that suggests to buy, buy, buy once we clear the MA50 [edit: weekly MA50 that is] (somewhere between 5 and 5.5K).
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/ODEYA3RI-WHEN-TO-GO-ALL-IN-IN-BITCOIN/



595. Post 50005557 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

MagicPoopCannon [funny name, but, apparently, an influential trader]: btc remains bullish and bullishness is increasing.
Target: mid to low 4000 as long as 50 EMA (currently at about 3750) is holding.

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/KVTwMKsF-Like-I-Said-Don-t-Freak-Out-Bitcoin-s-50-EMA-is-Holding-BTC/

On a second note, should we either move to Wyoming or at least consider domesticating any and all bitcoin-related businesses in Wyoming?
https://twitter.com/tracemayer?lang=en
see retweeted posts
https://twitter.com/CaitlinLong_?lang=en
https://twitter.com/CaitlinLong_/status/1101155388655841280



596. Post 50006115 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Hey, maybe a place for micg&gf to visit in Thailand:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/awrt2a/long_bar_at_patong_beach_in_phuket_thailand_just/

Future btc price at 100K-336K (opinion piece):
https://dailyhodl.com/2019/03/03/crypto-analyst-calls-bitcoin-bull-run-from-102000-to-336000-bitcoin-ethereum-xrp-price-analysis/




597. Post 50006728 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: Majormax on March 03, 2019, 06:57:19 PM



When we talk of %invested, do we mean original amount invested, or current ratio? Because mine are VERY different.

That begs an interesting question with regard to rebalancing of investments.

For any investment, it should represent a minimum and maximum % of the portfolio. Sales and purchases rebalance when it gets outside the range. I would guess BTC s limits for an investor would be a lot wider than for conventional investments (example min 2%, max 50%) but the balancing would still apply.

Opinions will be interesting.

Every single time I rebalanced my stock portfolio, I lost potential gains.
The explanation is simple: winners (could be either individual stocks or sectors) continue to be winners and losers continue to be losers for much longer than you expect.
In other words: make the initial allocation, then, if it works, don't balance anything, apart from cashing out.



598. Post 50007381 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: mindrust on March 03, 2019, 07:41:10 PM
We haven't seen a real capitulation yet.

ORLY.
Why 6.5 to 3.1 was not it?
Inquiring minds want to know.

Quote from: kenzawak on March 03, 2019, 07:47:37 PM

I guess it depends :
-do you want to be rich now ?
-do you want to be richer later ?

I'm choosing "now" personally. I'm impatient. So yep I want the price to go up ASAP.

I would take 100K ASAP vs 1mil in 10 years anytime in the next year or two to be even more specific  Grin



599. Post 50007812 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

the trend is bullish
bitcoin's success keeps the warmth
hoping for the best



600. Post 50009479 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 03, 2019, 11:01:04 PM

Funny how that works, even though in Paleo times, I doubt that any of those shapes of women would even come close to any of the women in existence in those times, even the top most levels.  
Surely a sign of the bad foods of modern life.

Perhaps they were not fat, but they surely desired to be, which is, of course, the opposite of our current (OECD) situation.
Here is the 30 thou year old Venus of Willendorf.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf

Quote from: kingcolex on March 03, 2019, 10:13:20 PM
Well I'm not a chubby chaser, the wife is a dime and a slim one at that she's under 110 when not pregnant. Maybe im more a realist right now. A chubby bitch in lingerie ain't bad.

A couple of general points:

You need some body fat to get pregnant.
Typically, women with BMI less than 19 have difficulty getting pregnant.



601. Post 50022294 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: Saint-loup on March 04, 2019, 08:59:33 AM
#bitcoin chart update: 14 months to halving. Note that 2011 bottom was at 12 months, and 2015 bottom at 10 months before halving .. 🚀

https://twitter.com/100trillionUSD/status/1102122695683133440

I want to challenge the main premise here.
BTC bottomed up on Jan 14 2015, NOT in August of 2015.
The preponderance of evidence says it:

1. Daily closing was higher on ALL exchanges on Aug 24 vs Jan 14, 2015.
2. Only one or two exchanges had a deep plunge on Aug 24, 2015. In fact the LOWEST average exchange price on that day is $196.26 in comparison with $157.29 on Jan 14.
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BTC-USD/history?period1=1420351200&period2=1443934800&interval=1d&filter=history&frequency=1d

Conclusion: The fact that ONE exchange (was it stamp or finex, I don't remember) was affected intraday is totally irrelevant.
Recorded BTC index price for that day (Aug 24) shows $196.26 intraday low, so this should be sufficient.

Moving on to authors conclusions:

2012 low was 12 mo before halving

2015 low was almost 18 mo before halving on July 10, 2016 (and not 10 mo as per author's assertion).

Counting from Dec 14 2018 local low, next halving would be in about 18 mo after low, which would actually fit the lengthening trend very well (12, 18, 18).

TL;DR The author suggests a shrinking lead time, which is not supported by anything except an intraday low on one exchange.




602. Post 50024395 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Check out this Coinbase announcement.
Say whatever you want, but their response rate is fast.

https://www.coindesk.com/coinbase-pushes-out-ex-hacking-team-employees-following-uproar



603. Post 50036309 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 05, 2019, 05:26:46 PM
BlockFi looks to boost market with launch of high-interest accounts​.

New York lending firm BlockFi announced Tuesday it is launching a crypto savings account with 6 percent annual interest, payable monthly in bitcoin or ether.

https://www.theblockcrypto.com/2019/03/05/crypto-cash-back-blockfi-looks-to-boost-market-with-launch-of-high-interest-accounts%E2%80%8B/

Well that's audacious.

How the hell can something like that be sustainable?

I looked at it. Very enticing if it truly works. 6% is a lot.
However, 6% interest rate (in btc) sounds implausible.
The only way I can see this working would be them lending your bitcoin to margin players, which pay 20% yearly.
They (blockfii) also have cash lending program, but margin calls upon sudden plunges would be a worry there.
I guess if someone would want to get $$ at $800/btc equivalent, then it might be reasonably safe (unlikely to receive a margin call).



604. Post 50037206 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: d_eddie on March 05, 2019, 11:31:49 PM
BlockFi looks to boost market with launch of high-interest accounts​.

New York lending firm BlockFi announced Tuesday it is launching a crypto savings account with 6 percent annual interest, payable monthly in bitcoin or ether.

https://www.theblockcrypto.com/2019/03/05/crypto-cash-back-blockfi-looks-to-boost-market-with-launch-of-high-interest-accounts%E2%80%8B/

Well that's audacious.

How the hell can something like that be sustainable?
They can do what they like with their own coin, can't they? Including closing shop when things get clumsy.
Your coin, you say? Not yours anymore since you gave up your keys.

Right, but I am afraid that services like this would proliferate soon.
People hope against reason to consume without selling their btc.
I expect bakkt to do something similar.



605. Post 50037907 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.34h):

Quote from: JSRAW on March 06, 2019, 12:55:39 AM
But now when I look back. It turns out a good call. Because of panic or some luck, I sold my 80% portfolio at ATH.

I am still learning, slowly but I am much informed and prepared now in comparison of last year.


It's not selling that is difficult, it's buying back at the right time.
A few could do it repeatedly.
Usually, investors would not buy back a sold position even when the opportunity presents itself, and I am guilty of this myself (mostly in stocks).



606. Post 50038762 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: bitserve on March 06, 2019, 03:22:00 AM
I get horrified and scared any time I see you guys talking about $100K or even $30K as if it was a SURE thing. What kind of capitulation is this?


This thread cannot be indicative of anything one way or another.
In the mainstream investment world (cnbc, forbes, bloomberg) btc is dead and is being mostly ridiculed for 14 mo already.
Objectively, the situation for most OECD area btc miners is still bad.
No profits, less losses than a couple of months ago.
BETI is close to almost all time low (-2.09 last time I checked vs -2.22 all time low).
BTC is scraping barely above the 200 WMA.
Are you NOT entertained?



607. Post 50050801 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: 600watt on March 06, 2019, 12:51:51 PM
There isn't enough bitcoin for all of today's millionaires to own an entire bitcoin each.

We won't call them millionaires anymore though, they will be known as "wholecoiners".

This may be the last chance for the average person to acquire a full bitcoin and that title.

https://twitter.com/alecziupsnys/status/1102908165719506947?s=21


I boldly claim to be the first one who came up with this observation. Must have been in 2015 or 2016 and i think it was in this forum.  


It is funny since I remember that back then this observation did not receive much attention, but in the last two years it appears in twitter, reddit and even crypto media outlets quite regularly.



July 3, 2014.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=676030.msg7664884#msg7664884

Quote
There were 29 million millionaires in the world in 2012 (probably more now). Each of them cannot get even a single bitcoin.
It is typical for millionaire home offices to allocate at least 5% to alternative investments.
If, instead of 5%, bitcoin will become just 1% of millionaires investment, the price at the equilibrium would have to be $40000 to achieve this allocation (1%).
This does not even take into consideration the other 99.4% of the humanity.



608. Post 50051828 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

the fuc is wrong with captchas on this board?
maybe I am a robot.

EDIT: f-n moron, presumably robot, does not know how buses look like.



609. Post 50052392 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: vapourminer on March 07, 2019, 12:25:44 AM
There isn't enough bitcoin for all of today's millionaires to own an entire bitcoin each.

We won't call them millionaires anymore though, they will be known as "wholecoiners".

Nice! And "multicoiners" if double digits.  Grin

I think that three or more meets the definition of multi-,but hey what do I know.  Double digits is some way higher levels, that's for sure.  The 21 club is becoming more and more prestigious, too.

heres to all of us reaching "fuckyoucoiner" levels.

That sounds like a poll in the making. "How many coins does it take to reach fuckyoucoiner levels?"

sounds good to me. im curious as to the numbers myself.

FYC poll-good idea.
My 2c. the "f you money" was in the movies. Stated as $2.5 mil here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdfeXqHFmPI
Somewhere expensive (Silly valley?) it could be more (maybe $10mil)

$2500000/$3860=648 BTC, only probably two-five thou people have that worldwide.
At 19780/btc it was 126 btc.
How times change.



610. Post 50052852 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: jojo69 on March 07, 2019, 12:37:25 AM
the fuc is wrong with captchas on this board?
maybe I am a robot.

EDIT: f-n moron, presumably robot, does not know how buses look like.

https://bitcointalk.org/captcha_code.php

theymos made us a backdoor

that ain't working for me.
If I leave captcha out and simply login, it says: you have to solve captcha.
If I don't login and click on the link to php, then it says: you have to login.
catch-22.

stupid bicycles and buses never work anymore

Quote from: vapourminer on March 07, 2019, 01:00:48 AM
~330.. ~650..

??

man the numbers im thinking of are considerably higher.. like at least 10k btc. as in $40 million USD. as a starting number.

am i THAT decadent?

i SUPPOSE i could deal with 10 million USD, so 2.5k btc. but man thats gonna cramp my style and really limit who i can say "fuckyou" to.

EDIT: using $4,000 USD to make maths easier

yes you are, pal, at least at these USD levels.
who has 10K btc? This is exchange type levels.
There are only maybe 100-200 people/entities with this kind of stash.



611. Post 50053716 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: bitserve on March 07, 2019, 03:36:01 AM
Bob has been way too upset during the bear market to have sold any amount significant enough to make your point relevant.

 Have not SODL anything since I was openly discussing plans for my early retirement fund in 2017 (which, coincidentally, paid me out my first paycheck yesterday, to keep me going for the next 20 years)

 I would like to think I've been brutally honest with my intentions with regards to selling and hodling. I'm not here to screw anyone over, push any agenda, or be anything other than supportive of Bitcoin, long-term, and be a fun member of this community.

 I do have some tax liabilities that I need to meet this year, however, as a result of setting up my fund. (Why I keep whining about wanting to sell another $1M to "be happy" - only really executed 66% of my retirement plan. Enough to create the fund, but not entirely enough to take a one-time long-term capital gains tax payment and have leftovers in another rainy-day portfolio)

 Have been making estimated IRS Tax payments every quarter this year from my cash reserves, but figure I'm still on the line for a nontrivial low...ish six-figure tax payment.

 Likely to be liquidating 3,500 LTC in late March, to cover a significant portion of my liabilities, and cracking into another piggybank-portfolio to make up the difference (or not, if LTC goes significantly higher than $50 USD).

 I believe I stated in the past my next sell target for BTC is $11,000 USD. Likely to sell a block of 50 BTC at that point.


Yes, you have been very open and coherent about it in your post history. I, obviously, can't attest if everything you say is true even if I personally believe it is. But you have always been very clear and verbose about your stash dealings. In fact it has been very interesting and instructional to learn about your experience... which is something many of us would like to be able to sorta replicate in the future if everything goes "according to the plan".


Seconded. I have a pretty good memory and I remember BLB's discussion around 11K very well.



612. Post 50066038 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: jojo69 on March 07, 2019, 03:38:48 PM
The light that reflects off of cryptoqueen is indeed pleasant to perceive.

it's cryptoqueeen, apparently.
ask micg (or her) why the extra "e". IDK.

In other news:
Interesting fight in the alt land...
https://twitter.com/ameensol/status/1103739189529460736

Apparently some VC guy thinks that eth is "loosing its lead" whatever this means.
He probably means losing, albeit who knows, maybe its "lead" is getting loose (aka not tight), lol.



613. Post 50066296 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on March 08, 2019, 12:03:38 AM
https://bitcoinist.com/gemini-backed-bitcoin-interest-account/

6.2% annual interest for a Bitcoin account sounds appealing. The idea is good and may attract many investors. But what if BlockFi turns out to be the new Bitconnect? Who cares that it is backed by Gemini?Any thoughts on this?
There's no way they can sustain 6.2% annual Bitcoin interest unless they pay it in fiat or virtually nobody deposits/stays deposited.

Sounds sketchy but some might take the risk (not me).




614. Post 50091738 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on March 09, 2019, 08:23:45 AM

Which doesn't mean that University (even in it's current state) has no place at all, as anyone who needs someone or something to kick their asses to be productive can still benefit from them. But in most cases they just exacerbate the underlying problem that starts in elementary school. Namely turning curious and motivated kids into retarded unmotivated copy/paste drones.

Seems like being a teacher at American universities isn't very lucrative (this guy is also my favorite you tuber). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7lGCPX_8nc

I watched that video. A cool guy.
Few points:

1. He is talking about security of a job mostly, not about the level of pay. Full time position, which is called either Instructor (if it is not tenure or tenure-track) or Professor is still relatively well paid in US.
Average is $114K a year (glassdoor number), but median is probably more like $80-90K. Yes, sometimes these are 1-3 year contracts, but it is OK, since most people around here don't have any job security whatsoever and could be fired on a whim (in my "right to work" state).

2. He is talking about teaching only job, which typically pays less because faculty oriented toward research (Natural Sciences) get some additional salary allocation from grants.

3. What he is not talking about, but certainly represents a crisis in my opinion, is the steady decline of intellectual capabilities of students and their ability to learn, comprehend and retain learned material.
Since I taught continuously since 2011, I am in some position to see this. The situation is simply catastrophic. Of course, there are always good/great students, but overall average is declining rapidly, which already resulted in publication of dumber textbooks, and even those are becoming too difficult for an average student to comprehend.
What is the cause? I don't know, but infatuation with phones/youtube might be causing short attention spans, easy distractability, etc.
People just don't have enough time to quietly contemplate more advanced thoughts.

Here is one study on the matter:
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2018-06-14/study-people-are-getting-dumber

If this trend would continue, then massive higher education would become either impossible or a laughingstock even from today's perspective in 10 more years or even less.
Remember the "Costco University"?

We will probably revert to a situation where only a small minority would have true higher education.
Maybe it is for the best, otherwise there is always an outcry for easier tests, grade curving, etc.
There was absolutely NO grade curving when I was a student rather long time ago.



615. Post 50094225 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

I just realized that WO has above 21 mil views.
We should have celebrated at 21 mil.
If we did, it flew over my reading patterns.



616. Post 50104393 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: GrosWesh on March 10, 2019, 11:23:33 AM
Hi there !  Smiley

I'm reading all your post every single day since weeks but i never write here, in part due to my imperfect english (i'm french).

Today, i'd like to ask you your thoughts on something i've been aware this morning.

Some people think following big wallet is pretty often annoncing huge dumps by its movements.

https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/18rnfoQgGo1HqvVQaAN4QnxjYE7Sez9eca


two possibilities:

1. They simply moved it from non-segwit address to segwit addresses. If they wanted to dump, you can dump from non-segwit just as easily.

2. They still have 54K BCH sitting in the same address on bcash chain. Perhaps they are followers/adherents? Speculating on whether it could be Bitmain would not be completely impossibile.



617. Post 50104470 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 10, 2019, 05:01:37 PM
Good AM Bitcoinland.

Still sideways... currently $3892USD/$5222CAD (Bticoinaverage).

Ho freaking hum.
_______

Sunday... haiku day?
Or is that meme obsolete?
I guess I'll find out.

You....you...
https://youtu.be/218iXiKhKlg?t=4

masterful



618. Post 50104709 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Nice twitter feed (pour yourself some coffee and grab a sandwich):

https://twitter.com/nlw/status/1104782467498733568

Much of it is about bitcoin, but some mention the "others".
Bitcoin entries are ## 1, 2, 4, 11-18



619. Post 50105779 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 10, 2019, 06:38:40 PM
first time that I ever heard about the kind of usage of goofball that you refer to, so seems to me that your interpretation must be an extreme regionalism or perhaps a small group of your friends

You made me look it up.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Goof

...I was led to believe it was used in this sense in the USA as well.

Just thought I'd give you a heads up. (Damn, is "heads up" another Canadianism, based on hockey?)   Huh



"goofball" is close to be endearing (or at least neutral as in "silly") in USA.
Isn't it funny that the same word in a neighboring country means something totally different.

Or, wait..."mate" is not used in US.
Definitely, not a buddy/friend/acquaintance. Actually, it is more of a scientific term (as in "mating") than anything else.
"heads up" means the same, however.
 
A few more canadian-specific words/meanings:
https://www.shakeology.com/blogs/2016/11/02/13-canadian-words-with-totally-different-u-s-meanings/
Australian-specific:
https://www.bigstockphoto.com/blog/uncategorized/20-australian-words-that-mean-something-different-in-the-us/
UK:
https://www.bigstockphoto.com/blog/uncategorized/20-british-words-that-mean-something-totally-different-in-the-us/



620. Post 50106789 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on March 10, 2019, 07:54:26 PM

Actually a lot of those words are actually just what the rest of the world calls things rather than using Americanisms.

Serviettes are serviettes in England, Kenya, Mexico, Canada, and most English-speaking countries around the world. Only Americans call them "paper napkins".

Bacon from the back (loin) of the hog is called "back bacon" in most places. Only in the USA is it called Canadian bacon. Some Canadians call it "peameal bacon". The Brits often call side bacon "streaky bacon".

Only in the USA is synthetic cheese-like garbage called "American cheese". The rest of the world calls it "process cheese".

In most of the world "football" is played with the feet, not the hands. Exceptions are Canada and Australia.

Funny language, English.
_____

As for the word "goof" meaning a lowlife, it's apparently used in the USA as such (although perhaps mostly in prison) but with a slightly narrower definition.

Here in Canada it is used for pedophiles, informers, rapists and other unreliable or undesirable scum. In the USA it seems to be used mostly to describe pedophiles who prey specifically on young boys.

Aren't words fun?  Cheesy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English-speaking_world

258 mil native english speaking in US,
60mil in UK
25 mil in australia
19 mil in canada

So, by this stat 258/360=about 72%, so I don't get your lamentation of us vs "them".
72% is not americanism, it is a majority and the rest is region-specific, sorry.

Re the offending "goofball", NOBODY uses it in US to describe pedophiles as others told you already.
"Goofball" is mostly associated with Disney character "Goofy", which pics were posted above.

In addition to meaning "silly" it was also used to describe a drug 60-100 years ago, but NOT anymore.
I have no idea where you are getting this.



621. Post 50107005 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: vapourminer on March 10, 2019, 08:21:53 PM
Only in the USA is synthetic cheese-like garbage called "American cheese". The rest of the world calls it "process cheese".

Aren't words fun?  Cheesy

maybe youre thinking of what is actually labeled "cheese food" or something like that for the fake stuff here in the usa.

food labels have gotten better in the usa but they still mislead as much as possible.

Bon appetite!
https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/food-fraud-and-commonly-mislabeled-foods-31388

officially, you can have as little as 5% cocoa in "chocolate" (in US); in EU it is 25% at the minimum.
What's the rest/filler? I don't know exactly.



622. Post 50109395 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: jojo69 on March 11, 2019, 01:04:33 AM
In the USA it seems to be used mostly to describe pedophiles who prey specifically on young boys.

Aren't words fun?  Cheesy

never heard that

to me it is a very mild, endearing version of silly

exactly.
Ask american for a rubber when you want to erase a pencil mark and you would get funny looks.
yet rubber=eraser in other places and it is fine.

In other news, here is a possible run to 100K by either 2020 or 2021:
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/jC8GrS8d-BITCOIN-TIMING-THE-NEXT-BULL-RUN-TO-100-000-CryptoManiac101/



623. Post 50120698 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 11, 2019, 10:25:22 AM
And the number one greenhouse gas is water.

This is correct as per the link below, which was of a surprise to me as to how much it contributes (95%).
https://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

What is vaporizing the water then? Is there a historical data on increase in sun's activity?
The rise of temperatures is more a less a fact, AFAIK.



624. Post 50121881 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 11, 2019, 09:07:44 PM
And the number one greenhouse gas is water.

This is correct as per the link below, which was of a surprise to me as to how much it contributes (95%).
https://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

What is vaporizing the water then? Is there a historical data on increase in sun's activity?
The rise of temperatures is more a less a fact, AFAIK.

THE SUN IS CAUSING GLOBAL WARMING!

Edit: I'm a pickle. You can trust me. It's the sun. *nods* *nods* /sip *nods* /burp

I was asking for facts, not declarations.
Nevermind, I found something.
Maybe warming would soon be replaced by cooling:
https://phys.org/news/2017-03-sun-impact-climate-quantified.html

Quote
...since we have been observing a consistently strong phase since 1950, it is highly likely that we will experience another low point in 50 to 100 years' time. It could be every bit as intense as the Maunder Minimum, which brought particularly cold weather during the 17th century.



625. Post 50122046 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 11, 2019, 09:25:23 PM
And the number one greenhouse gas is water.

This is correct as per the link below, which was of a surprise to me as to how much it contributes (95%).
https://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

What is vaporizing the water then? Is there a historical data on increase in sun's activity?
The rise of temperatures is more a less a fact, AFAIK.

THE SUN IS CAUSING GLOBAL WARMING!

Edit: I'm a pickle. You can trust me. It's the sun. *nods* *nods* /sip *nods* /burp

I was asking for facts, not declarations.
Nevermind, I found something.
Maybe warming would soon be replaced by cooling:
https://phys.org/news/2017-03-sun-impact-climate-quantified.html

Quote
Exactly how the sun will behave over the next few years remains a matter of speculation, however, since appropriate data series have only been available for a few decades and they reveal no evidence of fluctuations during this time. "To that extent, our latest results are still a hypothesis," says Schmutz, "and it remains difficult for solar physicists to predict the next cycle." But since we have been observing a consistently strong phase since 1950, it is highly likely that we will experience another low point in 50 to 100 years' time. It could be every bit as intense as the Maunder Minimum, which brought particularly cold weather during the 17th century.

Fine! Here are some pickle facts.

Planets rotate around stars in an elliptical orbit. Thus our distance from the sun varies over time, and consequently, the amount of radiated energy received.

The planets tilt changes over time, changing which parts of the planet are exposed to what percentages of sunlight, thus varying local climate.

Sunspot activity. The amount of energy radiated from stars is not constant. It fluctuates. Like a witch being burnt on the stake, at different layers of flesh or muscle or bone being burned, different amounts of energy are radiated.

I actually found the reference (^^) to sun spot activity probably decreasing relatively soon, so this point is clear with a prediction of a possible minimum aka cooling in 50-100 years.
Tilting is irrelevant to the 50-100 year period discussion when tilting cycle is 41000 years, which makes the effects of tilting cycle within a 50-100 year period either minimal if not non-existing.



626. Post 50122845 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 11, 2019, 11:10:20 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYZut3DWvek
CRYPTO Official Trailer (2019) Kurt Russell, Luke Hemsworth Movie HD

looks crap but whaddayagonnado

Easy.
Not pay money/fiat to watch it.



627. Post 50123540 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on March 12, 2019, 12:42:45 AM
^^
Mostly when you piss out VODKA you have had enough....

impossible...
however, when you "break the seal"...it is irritating.
http://mentalfloss.com/article/31408/science-breaking-seal



628. Post 50123612 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on March 12, 2019, 01:26:06 AM
^^
Mostly when you piss out VODKA you have had enough....

impossible...
however, when you "break the seal"...it is irritating.
http://mentalfloss.com/article/31408/science-breaking-seal

Haha, i drunk a few on short time last evening but a mix of different beverages Roll Eyes
We were sitting @this cosy beach view place with shisha pipes, after those drinks and foods we order one (a 1-2 max 3 times year event) cause i’m a Total no smoker
But you know drunk, holiday Then this dude abides of-course and my GF as a NO smoker also like the shisha on holiday
That Said, i was drunk and order this large big size watermeloen-Peach tasting pipe (i think they used tobacco) cause after a short time 10 heavy blows i was turning around of my center point
Getting dizzy AF——-> end of story was early bed feeling sick Roll Eyes
Good i’m back to go when the morning started

Nice Wink
EDIT: removed irrelevant info due to location.



629. Post 50124331 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.35h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on March 12, 2019, 03:28:51 AM
seashells

you got any of those you wanna trade? we might be on to something here..

Shells and rai stones were traded sometimes by a reference.
A seller simply referred to a stone (that was on the bottom of the sea due to a boating accident) in his/her transaction.
Therefore, micg has the buying power based on those seashells...since he seems to be able to wave his hand over them, obviously.

Gosh, sometimes I feel like this is exactly what we have for the "usual" money right now.
In a few days I would probably be an accomplice in creating a bunch more as I am angling for a loan.
My loan would create "money". Weird.



630. Post 50135424 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

College admission scandal in US.
Dozens charged, probably hundreds more exist.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/us/college-admissions-cheating-scandal.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/style/olivia-jade-giannulli-college-admissions-scandal.html

A kind of situation that is predictable in mostly fiat world.
Reeks of decadence, IMHO.
Bitcoin should fix this.

I wonder, why they need all those degrees when they have basically no use for them afterwards.
Do you really need a degree to expose your "assets" strategically (a la Kardashians)?
Just put on a fishnet or something.

BTW, will BA precipitate/initiate a bear market in stocks? I regret not buying puts at the end of the day yesterday.



631. Post 50136539 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

Ronaldooooo!



632. Post 50137267 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 12, 2019, 10:32:23 PM
Flee. Simple as that.

Where?
Not going to Mars.



633. Post 50138591 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

Quote from: GreatArkansas on March 13, 2019, 02:51:02 AM
Want to share this for everyone. This is really good for risk management.
snipped images

Concept is OK, but % wise I would never use these numbers as they are skewed toward less quality.
I only invest in what interests me.



634. Post 50138679 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

Quote from: Syke on March 13, 2019, 02:49:10 AM
Billionaires repeatedly put their money at stake for returns. "Everyone" else is staking their money on iPhones. So fuck off you filthy thief.

Billionaires don't create wealth. They hire people to create wealth and then underpay them. That underpayment gap has become obscene.

Smarter billionaires are starting to realize that they need non-pauperized public/middle class to sell the products to. This is how they make their money, mostly.
If everyone is poor, except a small %, then there is no mass market.
The question is how to get from here to there.

A peaceful small redistribution (not 70% of course, could be 1%) is much much better (as a principle, not in practice) than something worse, although I have NO trust in any politician and don't see anyone with enough 'balls" to pull this off.
The alternative is much darker, and I am not talking about riots, but a possibility of Homo sapiens subspecies emerging, "Citadels", etc.
A split between super- and sub-humans. Once it is partially genetic, there would be no passage back.

I am currently reading the third Harari's book (21 lessons for the 21st century), which touches on these topics and this book is much better than the second one (first was good too).



635. Post 50147704 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

House in Australia-being auctioned in crypto:
https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-casuarina-129081390

Not sure if any dolphins would qualify, but whales would do, probably  Grin

On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.



636. Post 50149550 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on March 13, 2019, 06:00:34 PM
Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant  bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.

I would have to say 86.89% unlikely, 10.11% possible; but not likely and 3% likely. I would further add that I think after this cycle ends there is a good chance the next cycle will be much shorter as in the 2013-2014 run up/dip/run up.
W

#stronghands'19

Does the intercept of the exponent and logarithmic regression curves represents the likely future peak (at around 80K)?



637. Post 50151868 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

Quote from: GreatArkansas on March 14, 2019, 12:21:13 AM
Hahahaha. I still can't understand, how to become the hat then?
Ask Papa John's to make you one with everything.
Or kindly ask our mad hatter xhomerx.
Papa John's and mad hatter xhomerx, please help me to create my own unique 'hat' with bitcoin/cat/dog theme.  Grin

Papa John's is a pizza joint in US, lol

In other news:

why captcha became so f-ed up around here?
it cannot properly recognize either the bus or a fire hydrant.
is someone/something messing with it?



638. Post 50153955 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on March 14, 2019, 05:13:40 AM

Dont worry..there is a possibility we A) have already done this or B) get a chance to do it all again. Conjugation, Booleans, Hamiltonians and Symmetry oh my...

Arrow of Time and its Reversal on IBM Quantum Computer.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.10057.pdf

Sheeit, you kids think you got problems now with block sizes, bandwidth and data migration...just wait until we have to store and reconstruct temporal timelines.


I see your "five" and raise you "ten": "there is no single objective reality"
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/613092/a-quantum-experiment-suggests-theres-no-such-thing-as-objective-reality/

Quote
They use these six entangled photons to create two alternate realities—one representing Wigner and one representing Wigner’s friend. Wigner’s friend measures the polarization of a photon and stores the result. Wigner then performs an interference measurement to determine if the measurement and the photon are in a superposition.

The experiment produces an unambiguous result. It turns out that both realities can coexist even though they produce irreconcilable outcomes, just as Wigner predicted.


Could be used in an argument with a spouse/gf? ....Nah.



639. Post 50174131 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on March 15, 2019, 02:52:55 PM
Why would we run out of electricity?
We have been producing electricity for over 100 years now, during countless wars and crisis, and with many different methods. Sure there might be temporary blackouts locally, but a total, for ever, worldwide blackout? Not gonna happen.

EMPs, magnetic pole shift, solar flare....
It could happen... Remote chance but it could happen....

I Don't see a pole shift interfering with electricity production, the other two are real threats, but it will still only be local and temporary (and a good reason to have an old pre electronic car in your garage as a backup, together with sufficient amounts of gasoline, and some vital electronics and devices in a Faraday's cage for spare just in case).

I understand your reaction, I cannot explain it but I know that it will get disrupted.

Quote from NationalGeographic:
"Many facets of our lives depend on the Earth’s magnetic field, anchored by the North and South poles, from the electrical grid that powers our computers to the satellites that let us watch TV."

Anyway in a polar flip the ozone layer will disappear for a lot of years and we will get cooked or irradiated Smiley

But how?

Apparently, world had experienced a huge solar flare in around 660 BC (https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a26817934/solar-storm-greenland/), the size of "an electrical grid would be down for months if not years" and that was with earth magnetic field intact. The last event that was previously recorded was a famous Carrington event in 1856 (with no electrical grid present yet).

The movement of poles have an intermediate stage where magnetosphere becomes chaotic. See:
https://www.livescience.com/18426-earth-magnetic-poles-flip.html

Well, I guess that a combination of a largish flare and chaotic magnetosphere would be an ELE (extinction level event).
Hopefully, before that we would travel to the stars.



640. Post 50174535 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.36h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 15, 2019, 04:00:34 PM
And also, just to reignite the climate debate. http://www.sciencebits.com/CosmicRays_Climate_TheMissingLink
c6h12o6 is my reponse to everything, prove me wrong.

glucose?



641. Post 50194115 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on March 16, 2019, 09:28:14 PM
Sitting at an airport bar in some foreign country, waiting another hour before my flight boards, and I begin my return flight to Texas (All alone. Rick had to bail earlier due to business matters tearing him away from us)

Beer #4 flowing through my veins.

Can't wait to get home.

On a tangential note, and without wanting to break any OpSec, I just wanted to sincerely, and honestly make a point about getting colonoscopies before age 40.

I recommend colonoscopies start at age 35, but, whatever.

Colon cancer has already taken a "brother" from my life - WAY before his time - and I don't wish to lose family members to the same disease in the future (Prognosis is good at this stage with early Stage 3 diagnosis for current family member undergoing treatment - the reason for my visit out of the country)

Perhaps, also do at least the 23andme test.



642. Post 50194492 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 17, 2019, 02:57:36 AM
Sitting at an airport bar in some foreign country, waiting another hour before my flight boards, and I begin my return flight to Texas (All alone. Rick had to bail earlier due to business matters tearing him away from us)

Beer #4 flowing through my veins.

Can't wait to get home.

On a tangential note, and without wanting to break any OpSec, I just wanted to sincerely, and honestly make a point about getting colonoscopies before age 40.

I recommend colonoscopies start at age 35, but, whatever.

Colon cancer has already taken a "brother" from my life - WAY before his time - and I don't wish to lose family members to the same disease in the future (Prognosis is good at this stage with early Stage 3 diagnosis for current family member undergoing treatment - the reason for my visit out of the country)

Perhaps, also do at least the 23andme test.



Don’t do any DNA test.   Your DNA data will be out in the wild and used against you.

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/dna-testing-ancestry-23andme-share-data-companies-2018-8

not sure what do you mean by 'used against you'?
I believe that you can use 'do not share' at least as far as not sharing with insurance companies.
That said, personally, I still did not do the test yet, although I am planning to do it sometime.



643. Post 50194540 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 17, 2019, 03:24:23 AM
It will go to insurance companies and you will be declined coverage accordingly.

It would not and it will not (at least in US).
Besides, you already gave your blood for regular testing, right?
If this is correct, then they could have sequenced your DNA already.

I do appreciate the caution, though.

In more practical terms, I am more concerned that the data from people driving habits could be (potentially) pipelined to auto insurance as your android/iphone definitely knows the speed of your driving vs the speed limit in an area. That would be nasty as around here the flow on the highway is ALWAYS 5-10 miles above the speed limit and you have to stay with the flow.

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 17, 2019, 03:24:23 AM
If you get a DNA test, and you know that you have a higher than average chance to get a specific disease, and don't disclose that to an insurance company, then your insurance cover is void.

Better not to know, and to be covered by health insurance than know, and be uninsurable.  

That's NOT how it works in US.
There is no coverage denial for pre-existing conditions, AFAIK.



644. Post 50194588 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: lightfoot on March 17, 2019, 03:36:08 AM
That's NOT how it works in US.
There is no coverage denial for pre-existing conditions, AFAIK.
Right now, yes. However get rid of Obamacare and things can change.... quickly.

Sorry but the future is not what it used to be.

Not going to happen.
Autism is an obvious pre-existing condition.
One in 59 children are on the spectrum (https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html).
If they would be denied coverage, there would be an outrage.



645. Post 50203514 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on March 17, 2019, 04:56:47 PM
My view is that DNA tests are too dangerous and that there are too many factors to control.  Therefore you should never do them.*

I sense a market opportunity for a middleman.

You pay middleman (via Bitcoin, ofc).
You create keypair.
You send bio sample to middleman, along with public key.
Middleman sends your sample to testing facility with no identifying info.
Testing facility sequences your DNA, sends data to middleman.
Middleman encrypts your test result data, makes it publicly available.
You watch for data (rest results) associated with public key, retrieve data, decrypt, use as you see fit.

Results private, as they not traceable to you.




Funny that i thought about it yesterday as well.
However, there is weak link with your description that I outlined in bold.
When you send a sample, it HAS to be sent with identifying info (you register the sample collection kit on their website).
Whether or not a sample can be sent on the behalf of a person OR multiple samples could be sent from, say, LLC, I don't know yet (have to check the rules).

Quote from: Pamoldar on March 17, 2019, 01:41:44 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen, Year changed and Number changed, But the situation remains the same so.

(\__/) | ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄|
(• Ώ •)|   Buy ₿itcoin     |   
/   づ________|      and HODL!!!


https://twitter.com/crypto_rand/status/1107266029913288704
I like the text in the box design as much as the comment in the image. Enjoy the rain 🙂

I understand that it sounds ridiculous now, but IF he sold at $14, then he had a chance to rebuy at $2-3 later the same year.
He probably did not, hence I maintain that selling (with profit) during the dip is easy, it is buying again that is difficult.
I have several personal stories to tell another time. It is obvious to me that i cannot do it, so hodling is the way to go until I might need fiat (if ever).
 



646. Post 50203859 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 17, 2019, 10:36:10 AM
they'd need to produce their photos of you yourself being the driver at those dizzying speeds in order to prosecute you

considering that many people's face opens the phone and that the car (at least some) starts when your phone is present, I could see that possibly happening. Maybe not as a prosecution, but as a "sudden" and "personalized" auto insurance increase. That would be nasty.



647. Post 50204707 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 17, 2019, 07:19:33 PM
My view is that DNA tests are too dangerous and that there are too many factors to control.  Therefore you should never do them.*

I sense a market opportunity for a middleman.

You pay middleman (via Bitcoin, ofc).
You create keypair.
You send bio sample to middleman, along with public key.
Middleman sends your sample to testing facility with no identifying info.
Testing facility sequences your DNA, sends data to middleman.
Middleman encrypts your test result data, makes it publicly available.
You watch for data (rest results) associated with public key, retrieve data, decrypt, use as you see fit.

Results private, as they not traceable to you.




Funny that i thought about it yesterday as well.
However, there is weak link with your description that I outlined in bold.
When you send a sample, it HAS to be sent with identifying info (you register the sample collection kit on their website).

Yes, but it doesn't have to identify _you_. It need only identify the public key you gave middleman.

I guess I just assumed that would be understood without need of explanation.

Not a very elaborate thought to misunderstand.
However, as mentioned in another post, it is not clear that 23andme allows sample aggregation and 'pseudonyms'.
other than that, an OK idea.
EDIT: I checked and it seems that you cannot (no surprise there).
https://customercare.23andme.com/hc/en-us/articles/202907890-Can-I-be-genotyped-anonymously-
TOS are linked there ^^
Perhaps, there is a legal leeway based on article 6d of the said TOS, but it remains to be seen, especially whether they still need person's real name in the docs.



648. Post 50205014 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: jojo69 on March 17, 2019, 07:35:36 PM
Not a very elaborate thought to understand.
however, as mentioned in another post, it is not clear that 23andme allows sample aggregation and 'pseudonyms'.
other than that, an OK idea.

There are other private sequencing firms, not to mention the original, and IMO still the best, Bryan Sykes Oxford Ancestors.

Quote
We follow strict security procedures in the storage and disclosure of information that you have given to us and take all reasonable care to prevent any unauthorised disclosure of your data.

For the purposes of the Data Protection Act 1998, Oxford Ancestors Limited is the data controller.

The information you provide will be kept confidential and used to support your customer relationship with us. We collect personal data only if you choose to provide such information, for example when ordering our goods and services. This will include name and address and may also include email address and credit or debit card details in order that we may collect payment for your order.  

Although we use encrypted security software the security of information and payments transmitted via the Internet cannot be guaranteed. Any losses incurred or sustained by customers who transmit information by means of e-mail or other internet link shall be borne solely and exclusively by the customer and in no event shall any such losses in whole or part by borne by us.

Quite a bit more expensive ~$400 as I recall, but the other options have...umm...other ways of monetizing their activities.

That's an ancestry firm, basically just to establish paternity (whether the father is the "real" father, etc.). it will not provide data on cancer susceptibility, etc.

From what I gathered so far if you want to do the 'whole genome' works, you should ask your doctor to transmit doctor's orders to one of the few centers which do the 'whole genome sequencing'. The caveat in my knowledge so far is how to pay for this work without insurance being involved. I will get this answer sometime next week. The cost with insurance is about $5K with most of it paid by insurance, but, of course, they'll go for it only if such test is needed.



649. Post 50207642 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on March 17, 2019, 11:40:10 PM
Who is holding most BTC from WO family?

Probably Theymos.

Is this forum the wealthiest place of the future ?

Of course, not.
People like Jack Dorsey, Marc Faber, some Silly valley exec (Paplitya? spelling?), Peter Thiel, Tim Draper etc are already converting fiat to btc. It's going to be the same people, sans maybe a thou or two current hodlers back from 2010-2011.



650. Post 50207697 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on March 18, 2019, 12:15:53 AM
Who is holding most BTC from WO family?

Probably Theymos.

The question is how much BTC and true HODLERS are in this forum
As real active members...
Is this forum the wealthiest place of the future ?


Yes it is good sir. Soon female Digital Gold diggers from all over the world will be on this forum, hoping to meet a WO man w a few coins in his stash. The idea of a WO member with double or triple digit coins will cause them to faint.

Also many of the actual women in pics posted in past comments will come forward, hoping their image pleased the WO family and looking for available hodlers to meet. Wallet size matters.  Grin

A link to WO-man and his women vid was already posted.
Hint: the one where she asks a guy in something resembling spouse counseling session whether he still invests in crypto and he winces.
That was way more realistic than the other way around.

EDIT: besides, right now, the anti-bitcoin bitmex'ers are probably the wealthiest group.
BTC lost close to $270 bil, hence someone got very rich in 2018-2019 at our collective expense.
I remember seeing some 'shorting' accounts on Bitmex that are worth 20 mil and above.
Oh well, hopefully, it will get reversed in due course.



651. Post 50208287 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

My btc price trajectory preference between March 16, 2019 and Dec 10, 2021 (1000 days exactly):

An increase of 0.36959% daily, never a decrease, peak at 160K on that ^ day, then flat for 6-12 mo  Grin
Not likely to happen, right? lol

TL;DR
I would so much prefer a flat after a rise instead of too much up and down.




652. Post 50208581 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 18, 2019, 02:55:38 AM
I capitulated today.  Am now 100% cold hodl storage Bitcoin for my crypto portfolio.   No fiat reserves left at all and no open trading positions.  Am completely committed to the bandwagon.  

I have also increased my Bitcoin stack by 58% since 1 December 2017 so good outcome there.

Time will tell if I have moved too early but I believe the risk of any meaningful downside is now gone.  

I am curious. Were you mostly naked short or short-against-the box?
Which platform did you use, if I may ask?
AFAIK, Bitmex is not opened for US.
This is very academic to me since I don't have time to do any real-time trading these days.



653. Post 50208966 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on March 18, 2019, 04:15:06 AM
via Imgflip Meme Generator

Sorry, that's August 2017 newspaper.
Still, a good feeling...



654. Post 50233342 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.37h):

Quote from: kenzawak on March 19, 2019, 07:28:57 PM
It seems like most people don't give much f... about ETFs anymore.
In February, the SEC asked the public to send comment letters... apparently it only received 7, six of which were against the VanEck SolidX ETF.

Here are the 7 letters they received :

https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2019-004/srcboebzx2019004.htm

1. Nobody cares about ETF.
2. Nobody cares about their idiotic never ending procedure.
3. Nobody cares about discussing a subject with morons (aka most of letter writing nincompoops). One even went as far as white paper discussion (in a letter to SEC, lol).



655. Post 50260802 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

A banquet is in progress.
The guests are enjoying an appetizer of raw oysters.
The entrιe consist of boiled dog.





656. Post 50262185 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: vapourminer on March 21, 2019, 11:52:15 PM
A banquet is in progress.
The guests are enjoying an appetizer of raw oysters.
The entrιe consist of boiled dog.

dont ask about anyones mother.

darn it...
Trying to elicit a response from someone else here.



657. Post 50262257 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Scienceguy9489 predicts btc move to 28K.
https://www.newsbtc.com/2019/03/21/crypto-bitcoin-ethereum-ripple-litecoin/

Interesting charts. It seems that ltc had almost exactly the same chart as BTC, wiggle for wiggle, until it started surging up a few weeks ago.
We are still in a flat more or less.



658. Post 50273681 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 22, 2019, 05:15:31 PM

As part of 226 slides presented to the SEC on our ETF filing,....

Causing a surge in p--n watching originating from the demonstration room. /s

In other news:
1. Fiat market celebrated yield curve inversion (and NEGATIVE rate on 10 year German bonds) by crashing a bit less than 2% on the Dow.
2. Blockfi weaseled out (as expected). Not going to bother even to ask them any questions. Irrelevant.



659. Post 50275449 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 23, 2019, 12:23:53 AM
Ok I stand corrected.  Hard Brexit date now 12 April.

It might extend all the way to 2020, or not.
Read somewhere that UK loses 1 bil pounds a day on this.
In case of brexit, UK would probably try to become an offshore capital of the world with a focus on EU.
I see a bunch of French and maybe German money relocating there.



660. Post 50287884 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 23, 2019, 11:15:59 PM
The odds of a marriage in the US today lasting for ten years is about 3%.

More like 50% or even 60-70%:
https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2017/01/137440/divorce-rate-in-america-statistics



661. Post 50288143 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Interesting stat: Belgium has a very high divorce rate (70%).
So, maybe not getting married is not such a bad idea.
Keeps you on your toes.



662. Post 50289434 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: Syke on March 24, 2019, 02:55:35 AM
Interesting stat: Belgium has a very high divorce rate (70%).

Nothing wrong with divorce.

True, but it won't add years to your life (in most cases) and would not make you richer (on paper) as well.
Guys would be limited in children visitation rights (and, yes, in more than 90% cases children stay with mom).
It's all theoretical, as I never divorced.



663. Post 50297772 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

what is bitcoin for?
a dull act slowly unveils
we WOn't stand for it



664. Post 50297995 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: vapourminer on March 24, 2019, 04:49:51 PM
If you wanna say "Hi" to CSW, he's here :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5120026

Well, I don't know who else would pay that much for an empty wallet... Seems like a bit of a dumb plan, though. Archived in case the post is deleted.

If you had lots of dodgy bitcoins.

A wallet that mined 300 bitcoins in the old days could be a viable "source" when explaining them at cash out


right?



proving the legitimacy of my coins...



I understand the reasoning, but we shouldn't have to, otherwise btc usefulness would be diminished.

In other news, what is WO take on giving btc to your own children? Worth it or idiotic since they don't know how to hold it safely?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/b4k9dd/bought_btc_for_my_14yr_old_daughter/



665. Post 50328881 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Not a vegetarian, but that about piece about libido it utter bs.
Bonobos f-k all the time, they are mostly vegetarians; we are very close to bonobos (judging by our "activities" and genetics).
Therefore, I proclaim (in the absence of any real evidence to the contrary) that vegeterianism does not affect the libido.
Perhaps, it even increases it, lol.
"Among the many promised bonuses of veganism is an improved sex drive."
https://www.thisisinsider.com/how-does-being-vegan-affect-sex-drive-2018-7



666. Post 50329043 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on March 26, 2019, 09:17:32 PM
A very good point:

Bitcoin is a universal unit of measurement

Just like 1 meter always = 100 cm, 1 bitcoin always = 100,000,000 sats

Using the dollar to value things (incl. BTC) makes little sense as its supply always changes

Imagine trying to measure smth if a meter constantly changed in length

In fact it would be like the meter constantly lost value. It would be like the surface area of your house kept increasing year after year, day after day! Tongue

Well, when I priced a house 1.5 years ago, it was significantly less btc than today, so is btc as a unit shrinking?
That whole argument is bs UNTIL we will start transacting for goods in btc.
As long as fiat is the main transactional venue, we might have to postpone purchasing large items with btc.

TL;DR how could it be a universal unit of measurement when it produces different measurements of the same item.
It is not bitcoin that changes, it is the house???

P.S. Mahmudov brothers are infamous for these gobbledygook exclamations while presumably shorting btc.



667. Post 50329587 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 26, 2019, 09:40:52 PM
Not a vegetarian, but that about piece about libido it utter bs.
Bonobos f-k all the time, they are mostly vegetarians; we are very close to bonobos (judging by our "activities" and genetics).
Therefore, I proclaim (in the absence of any real evidence to the contrary) that vegeterianism does not affect the libido.
Perhaps, it even increases it, lol.
"Among the many promised bonuses of veganism is an improved sex drive."
https://www.thisisinsider.com/how-does-being-vegan-affect-sex-drive-2018-7
Also close to chimps (chimps and bonobos being subspecies of the same recent ancestor). You know the difference between bonobos and chimps? When they meet, the chimps fucking murder the soy-apes.

For the technically minded, bonobos are very hard r-types. Chimps are K's. It's rabbits vs wolves. Quantity vs quality.

Check on your knowledge of K-type and r-type, perhaps?

Mice (and other rodents) are r-types (lots of progeny, few survive).
Apes (all of them) are K-types with few progeny (together with elephants, whales, parrots and eagles).



668. Post 50329698 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 26, 2019, 10:44:00 PM
@JJG but there is always some exceptional case in sports where the vegan player stays on top. I am aware of only one such player, Indian Cricketer Virat Kohli

I am far from convinced about the health benefits of veganism.. including the necessity to somehow get all essential fats in a vegan diet through plants or some bullshit, when those essential fats are frequently already present and largely already bio-available (without having to take a bunch of bullshit supplements) in various kinds of meats

google "avocado fats" : 21-29g fat in a ~150g vegetable. That's a lot and those are 'good fats' of a variety that increases HDL.

That said, I have nothing against meat. Overall, for older people it is perhaps beneficial to slowly transition to less red meat.



669. Post 50329875 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 26, 2019, 11:02:45 PM
q busy on the tx front https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#0,2d

hedge fund "nutties" trying to jam their tx on "the next block" as if it matters. /s

Actually, something similar occurred in Oct-Dec 2015 as we were getting "on our way" in the last bull market.
Maybe, a sign?



670. Post 50329921 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 26, 2019, 11:05:02 PM
Not a vegetarian, but that about piece about libido it utter bs.
Bonobos f-k all the time, they are mostly vegetarians; we are very close to bonobos (judging by our "activities" and genetics).
Therefore, I proclaim (in the absence of any real evidence to the contrary) that vegeterianism does not affect the libido.
Perhaps, it even increases it, lol.
"Among the many promised bonuses of veganism is an improved sex drive."
https://www.thisisinsider.com/how-does-being-vegan-affect-sex-drive-2018-7


Can confirm had vegan fuck bunny gf at one point.  Had to tell her to slow down, my balls hurt.

Plausible explanation:  she was not getting enough meat in her diet, and she was attempting to use you as a substitute.  How does it feel to have the tables turned and be objectified?  Good?

You are a girl, JJG.
I give it about 80% chance.
Boys don't talk about "objectification", ever.
That's fine.



671. Post 50330000 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 26, 2019, 11:16:46 PM
Not a vegetarian, but that about piece about libido it utter bs.
Bonobos f-k all the time, they are mostly vegetarians; we are very close to bonobos (judging by our "activities" and genetics).
Therefore, I proclaim (in the absence of any real evidence to the contrary) that vegeterianism does not affect the libido.
Perhaps, it even increases it, lol.
"Among the many promised bonuses of veganism is an improved sex drive."
https://www.thisisinsider.com/how-does-being-vegan-affect-sex-drive-2018-7


Can confirm had vegan fuck bunny gf at one point.  Had to tell her to slow down, my balls hurt.

Plausible explanation:  she was not getting enough meat in her diet, and she was attempting to use you as a substitute.  How does it feel to have the tables turned and be objectified?  Good?

You are a girl, JJG.
I give it a 80% chance.
Boys don't talk about "objectification", ever.
That's fine.

Oh my gawd!!!!!  I am so embarrassing to be caught..  Embarrassed .. and you are a girl too (85% odds) because boys don't call boys, boys.  Roll Eyes   Tongue

oh, yeah, like in here (not a fan of that commercial, though):
https://youtu.be/koPmuEyP3a0?t=34



672. Post 50330567 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on March 27, 2019, 12:25:23 AM
@JJG but there is always some exceptional case in sports where the vegan player stays on top. I am aware of only one such player, Indian Cricketer Virat Kohli

I am far from convinced about the health benefits of veganism.. including the necessity to somehow get all essential fats in a vegan diet through plants or some bullshit, when those essential fats are frequently already present and largely already bio-available (without having to take a bunch of bullshit supplements) in various kinds of meats

google "avocado fats" : 21-29g fat in a ~150g vegetable. That's a lot and those are 'good fats' of a variety that increases HDL.

That said, I have nothing against meat. Overall, for older people it is perhaps beneficial to slowly transition to less red meat.

Animal protein has a different ratio of the four amino acids than plant based protein. If you only consume plant protein you're going to end up with a surplus of some and a shortage of another.

And that's just one of the many deficiencies caused by a vegetarian diet (of course this is not true if you consume things like milk, eggs and/or other animal based foods or supplements). Humans are omnivores. Don't be ashamed of your species, that's silly.

Twenty amino acids, four is a number of nucleotides (A,C,G,T)  Wink.
That said, I am an omnivore, albeit starting to enjoy veggies (and fish) a bit more.





673. Post 50331109 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

Quote from: Syke on March 27, 2019, 02:25:37 AM
Animal protein has a different ratio of the four amino acids than plant based protein. If you only consume plant protein you're going to end up with a surplus of some and a shortage of another.

Soy is a good complete protein source, as are rice and beans combined.

There was a time (in 2008, in the middle of the financial crisis) when one third of my meals were R&B.
Can't say that I enjoyed it too much, but it was quite fulfilling, and, of course, as cheap as they come.
I also remember during college years some of my buddies had a competition: how can one spend the least amount of money while getting a reasonable nutrition?



674. Post 50360047 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

All things considered, I vote to replace " A handmaid's tale" with a "Canticle for Leibowitz", but all excellent choices to illustrate a point.
Which one?

A scorpion asks a frog to carry it across a river.
The frog hesitates, afraid of being stung by the scorpion, but the scorpion argues that if it did that, they would both drown.
The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion.
The scorpion climbs onto the frog's back and the frog begins to swim, but midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog, dooming them both.
The dying frog asks the scorpion why did it do it [stung the frog], to which the scorpion replies "I couldn't help it. It's in my nature."



675. Post 50360347 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.38h):

A premise: you wake up one day, and nobody knows anything about bitcoin (or any other crypto)...cypherpunk does exist, just no bitcoin..you, however, know as much as you know now.
Similar to "Yesterday" [the movie] premise, which is that all "Beatles" info got somehow erased from the mankind's collective memory with the exception of the main character (I am sure that there might be a twist in the end, though).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uqvgPm8U4c

I know that this is impossible, but what would you do?
Is someone here with a knowledge to reconstruct Satoshi's paper?
I am simply curious since I know the general outline, but probably wouldn't be able to properly formulate it.



676. Post 50396938 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 31, 2019, 04:24:10 PM


ROTFLMAO

I counter with "A dog wants to get into bitcoin, the owner does not let her to have any":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i82528KGDdo



677. Post 50418286 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 02, 2019, 04:22:53 AM
A 30% correction from $4200 is $2950.  

Not happening. That boat has sailed.  

it could happen...just on a single exchange  Grin

PS the local bull could be easily explained away by btc buying in anticipation of the new miners becoming available for purchase on April 9.
Once this passes, it could correct, but, alternatively, current momentum could build further. Not buying or selling.



678. Post 50432575 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Love the rally, hate the fact that two forks are up much more. This is bizarre.

In addition, a very long bear market kind of numbed me to the downside, and probably to the upside as well.
So far, it's just first spring leaves coming out, nice, but, hopefully much more to come (in time).



679. Post 50433675 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Ground control to Major "Corn":

...Ready to establish a brief orbit around an altitude of 6.5K before continuing to the final destination...Vega!



680. Post 50434055 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Investments would be taxed on a yearly basis (proposal)?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-02/top-senate-democrat-touts-annual-capital-gains-tax-ahead-of-2020

Bitcoin might help, since it is not a security, but personal property and/or commodity (depending on where you live).
Perhaps that 100mil fella was just an early bird?



681. Post 50434132 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.39h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 03, 2019, 04:29:43 AM
Investments would be taxed on a yearly basis (proposal)?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-02/top-senate-democrat-touts-annual-capital-gains-tax-ahead-of-2020

Bitcoin might help, since it is not a security, but personal property and/or commodity (depending on where you live).
Perhaps that 100mil fella was just an early bird?

That's ridiculous, and hopefully nothing like that passes.. it seems overly draconian, and would cause a need to counter-adjust in a lot of other areas..

With 1 tril yearly deficit, the need to ID new revenue sources is pressing (in those circles), I would say.
Not looking forward to seeing that proposal, but it simply cannot exist in current conditions where you have just 3K allowance yearly for losses.
What if they taxed someone one year based on 100mil in assets (hypothetically) and next year, his assets are worth 20mil.
They would have to pay him back (paying 3K would be laughable) and I don't see how they can, making the whole affair largely academic.



682. Post 50447882 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

A hypothesis:

'Everyone' agreed beforehand on bull market most likely commencing in 2020-2021, but
here comes Wyden with his ordinary (up to 37%) tax on 'appreciation' of assets (there would be exceptions, of course).
Btc bull market switches to 2019-2020 instead, thereby producing "orbital' btc prices by the end of 2020 instead of later.
End result: even if that law is enacted (only if Dems produce a sweep in 2020, which is unlikely but possible), your btc assets would not appreciate much in 2021-2023 as they would already plateaued at a very high number (say, 160-500K) and that tax law cannot be made retroactive to 2020.
Thereby, PTB initiated a "premature" btc startup engine ignition...just in case if the law ever passes.
Using the same logic, perhaps a wild stock and property bull markets would also ensue in 2019-2020 so investor class would ease into 2021-2023 with not much "new" gains to pay the "investment gains" tax on.
Stranger things happened.



683. Post 50448340 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 03, 2019, 10:34:40 PM
Bitcoin will be the Sapiens story of the 21st century

It's understood by millions across languages & cultures

The shared belief in the ability to:

- Securely store wealth through time
- Transfer wealth w/o 3rd party

Everyone needs it, most people just haven't realized it yet

https://twitter.com/misir_mahmudov/status/1113536149178454016?s=21

That Said....

I’m curious how Bcash, BSV, ver, imposter CSW, jihan etc Will be remembered Roll Eyes

All I remember those two dudes for is their opinions about btc going to $1500-1800.
Don't care about their fancy words about "Sapiens/civilization".
Maybe they are as wrong about "civilization" as they were about the price.



684. Post 50448394 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 03, 2019, 10:43:35 PM
Bitcoin will be the Sapiens story of the 21st century

It's understood by millions across languages & cultures

The shared belief in the ability to:

- Securely store wealth through time
- Transfer wealth w/o 3rd party

Everyone needs it, most people just haven't realized it yet

https://twitter.com/misir_mahmudov/status/1113536149178454016?s=21

That Said....

I’m curious how Bcash, BSV, ver, imposter CSW, jihan etc Will be remembered Roll Eyes

All I remember those two dudes for is their opinions about btc going to $1500-1800.
Don't care about their fancy words about "civilization".
Maybe they are as wrong about "civilization" as they were about the price.


Here I like what I read, where it coming from doesn’t matter much...



a source matters, as this smacks of mysticism.
Bitcoin is good at what it does, let's be practical about it.



685. Post 50451229 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Everyone expects the same as the last cycle or two.
I think that it would be different: something resembling 2013.

An approximate scenario: Hard up starting by the end of summer 2019, early fall (maybe 3.7K-6K oscillation beforehand), going much further than expected, could be 20K or even higher earlier in 2020 (Q1 or Q2), hard and fast correction to 7-8K, then re-acceleration into the end of 2020 with prices peaking at about 90-160K.
Dems take the Senate, introduce some wealth taxing legislation.
Bitcoin is in a hard correction during 2021-2022, maybe longer, a really long bear market (stock market is crashing as well).
Do you think that these neato 4-year cycles would continue forever?

TL;DR This would be a fast and furious cycle followed by a longer recession.



686. Post 50463406 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on April 04, 2019, 07:17:06 PM
[ edited out]

Jbreher should be joining his BCHABC - BTC-SV friends at r/btc. He can shit on Segwit/LN and Core dev. 24/7.

He will be loved over there  but here he's  just a moron.

Likely, jbreher "feels" as if he is performing a greater service these here parts.  Doing "god's work," so to speak.*


* NO jbreher.  I don't mind at all putting words into your mouth(or brain)...  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy  The only kind of contributory service that you seem to be providing around here is as a common grounds "punching bag."  Thanks for that.  Roll Eyes NOT
The only "feels" I see are coming from his opposition. Every post I've skimmed that was directed against him today was essentially completely worthless. All personal attacks and ideological horseshit over rigorous arguments.

I second it. His technical points are well taken. I haven't seen the real answer besides that answers would be provided in due time.
Personally, I am fully on btc team as the only fork coins I ever had came from forks, not by buying.

That said, I wished that we would be a bit farther along in LN and possibly in LN onboarding.
two points that he (jbreher) contends: fees are bound to go sky high and LN cannot onboard all earthlings if every on-boarding event is a single on-block tx (not batched).
While we were largely not looking, next block fees went up to $1 (from 2c in Jan).
It is still OK for largish tx, but makes little sense when you need to stitch together many UTXO (consolidate, as miners do).
I also don't like dismissive attitudes of someone's position when this position is clearly articulated.
Instead of calling names, provide an argument.



687. Post 50479157 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Exactly...and that was the best response to his verbiage as well (on twitter).
That said, it is possible that we would re-do the "summer of 2015" theme, which it would be up to $4800-5000, down to $3750, all within a month or two.
Then, up we go, by the exponent.
Impossible?

I still like to compare our recent flat with late 2012-early 2013. Check it out.
Nothing, then a hockey stick. It might happen here as well.
If it does, we might form a local peak at 35-40K as early as in 3-4 months (from the start of the exponential move), or in 5-6 mo if it is a bit stretched out.




688. Post 50479262 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 06, 2019, 02:24:11 AM
If we break the fractal and break upwards, I am developing a theory that 2019/2020 will see a rerun of the 2013 double peak.  The 2015 fractal is conclusively front run and broken upwards, and then we coming screaming back down and Bitcoin is pronounced dead.  And then after Bitcoin is officially dead, we bounce parabolically upwards.  


Yes, that's pretty much what I envison as well, see a couple of posts above.
If so, and played right, there would be a potential to make a LOT of dough, first on the upside, then either sell or short (for super-risk takers), then re-load for the ultimate adventure.
2013 did almost a 100x in a year or slightly less.
The rough equivalent would be to go to 35-45K on the first peak, "crash" down to 7-9K, then up again to 160-200K.
Numbers are very approximate, and could be 50% of what is indicated.



689. Post 50479459 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 06, 2019, 02:32:06 AM
^

I still like to compare our recent flat with late 2012-early 2013. Check it out.
Nothing, then a hockey stick. It might happen here as well.
If it does, we might form a local peak at 35-40K as early as in 3-4 months (from the start of the exponential move), or in 5-6 mo if it is a bit stretched out.

Hmmm interesting.  Would need to chart that.  


Here, just a sketch:




690. Post 50480451 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 06, 2019, 05:26:25 AM
Ok I have had a bit of a look and I can’t come up with any models which support $12k+ before November 2019 at the very earliest even with front running so I am not going to worry about that as a possibility.

Logically and TA-based, yes, but how about the fuh-damentals?
Was there a model in Jan 2013 indicating that in April 2013 the price would be 1800% higher?
Absolutely not, yet it happened.

Where is your "leap of faith", HM?
Toxic2400 also drew something that might happen, plus or minus.

Personally, I am a bit bored with all models that draw neat bowl like movements projecting into 2023.
Where is the fury of the exponent of the adoption stick?



691. Post 50504953 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

For POW "purists" out there, take a listen to Andreas Antonopoulos:

https://youtu.be/3W_3AQrQEOM?t=343

TL;DR LN looks like a POS-type system on the top of the POW system




692. Post 50505263 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: MrFreeRoMan on April 07, 2019, 09:49:41 PM
Make screenshots...
April 17, 2020 as the date of the next peak
April 18, 2019  high growth period ends



huh?



693. Post 50505390 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 07, 2019, 03:06:13 PM
Exactly, as I predicted earlier $6-6.5 in Summer, $10-15k Fall and new ATH in December 2019.

I don't expect a new high until well into 2021 myself. And when it does hit it's going to be pretty electrifying. Regaining $1000 was the culmination of a seemingly endless slog. It was more relief than euphoria. Next time around there'll be more appetite and more expectation.

My predictions -

End of 2019 - $6,500 - $7,500
Price by the halving (May 2020) - $9,000 - $10,000 ish
New ATH - Some time in 2021
Over $100,000 - 2022

Quote me damn it Wink

Ok, but why would we dilly-dally until 2021 when some alts (which are reacting faster) already tripled or quadrupled since Dec-Jan?
I say that this dreadnought is heating up its main engine and is about to sail (fast).
I would not be surprised by above 10K by the EOY and a new ATH in 2020.



694. Post 50507736 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

A bat from whatever...
2022 they said...2021 they said...
I say...it is the spring of 2013 all over again (by the looks of it).
Expect the unexpected (as far as where it might go).



695. Post 50508447 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on April 08, 2019, 05:29:04 AM
A bat from whatever...
2022 they said...2021 they said...
I say...it is the spring of 2013 all over again (by the looks of it).
Expect the unexpected (as far as where it might go).


we had to spikes like this pretty close to one another in 2015.

Nope, we did not, check out the current vertical RSI jump on VB1001 chart...nothing like 2015.



696. Post 50508486 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: kingcolex on April 08, 2019, 05:53:59 AM
A bat from whatever...
2022 they said...2021 they said...
I say...it is the spring of 2013 all over again (by the looks of it).
Expect the unexpected (as far as where it might go).


we had to spikes like this pretty close to one another in 2015.

Nope, we did not, check out the current vertical RSI jump on VB1001 chart...nothing like 2015.
Wasn't 2013 the $300 jump and wasn't it gox based or am I thinking of the wrong one?


(That one was fucking dope but I didn't buy btc but spent it on stupid fucking miners)

spring of 2013: btc moves from $12 to $250 in slightly less than four months.
Some people attributed it to Cyprus, some to the willy-bot. Whatever happened, the chart is there.
Funny that you mentioned: I am angling to buy a miner now, lol. Just playing with speculation is too boring.
That and maybe Casa hodl  Grin.



697. Post 50522105 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.40h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 09, 2019, 03:33:37 AM
I am far more worried about a disruptive innnovation which does away with the need for a blockchain (such as Grin) than I am worried about a Bitcoin carbon copy with a couple of parameter tweaks.  

Grin does have a blockchain, albeit a strange one.
You were probably thinking about Hashgraph.



698. Post 50537272 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

I already have a driver's license.
What's a bitlicense  Roll Eyes ?

...the galactic black hole was found in repeated violation of the "unlicensed bits" processing ban.
Pictures of multiple said violations are expected tomorrow, April 10.



699. Post 50550126 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: nutildah on April 10, 2019, 03:54:26 PM
You're better off just having children, which are one half you...

Oh-oh...someone did not take their GenBio class seriously  Wink
remember...meiosis...crossingover...random tetrad orientation toward the poles...it is NOT half you,
but rather your mom's and dad's original gamete chromosomes (that made you) recombining (for each pair independently), then contributing half of that mix (randomly, but one from each recombined pair) to YOUR baby.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 10, 2019, 09:36:22 PM
We are at Oct 2017 prices.. we could be at ATH in 60 days. It happened before, it could happen again.

Its childish, i know, but that keeps me entertained and faithfull when real life matters keep my soul sad about really inevitable things.

You are living a fantasy.

Currently, we do not have October 2017 momentum.


I beg to differ. Not sure where we are going, but momentum is substantial: if this would continue unabated for 30 days (at the same speed as in the last 9 days), we would be at 2.197X the price of April 1 by May 1, which is about $9000. It does not mean that we would get there, but so far so good...Buffett buys massively at above 500K in a few years, lol.



700. Post 50551648 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 11, 2019, 12:00:52 AM



Bitmex short trying to haul ass...it won't work.



701. Post 50564738 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on April 11, 2019, 08:34:07 PM
I hope you can catch what you hope for, but come on 4.5K--5K--or 5.5K = all the same Roll Eyes
For a long hodler of course

I've been hearing that for a while, and that still literally doesn't make any bit of sense to me. Each and every satoshi should be saved; the mathematics here is extremely simple.

Scenario 1:

You buy BTC at the rate of $4.5k per BTC with your $10k budget. You get ~2.22 BTC.  You sell your bitcoin at the rate of $50,000 each. You get $111,000.

Scenario 2:

You buy BTC at the rate of $5.5k per BTC with your $10k budget. You get ~1.81 BTC. You sell your bitcoin at the rate of $50,000 each. You get $90,500.

$111,000 minus $90,500 = $20,500 EXTRA.

Buying at $4.5k is NOT equivalent to buying at $5.5k, "especially" if you're thinking long-term.

it does not work like this at all as this is a simplified scenario.
What if you spend in one case 10K and in another 12.2K...you would have 50K in the end (in both cases).
Since it is not possible to buy ALL bitcoin, the example is underwhelming.
I am not even sure that I want to ever exchange btc to $$. Why would I?
IMHO, buy some, sell some (when you want) and not try to hit the highest (when selling) or the lowest (when buying).



702. Post 50564962 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

A simple fact:

in 1975 the minimal wage was $5.15 EDIT: looked at a wrong reference, apparently it was $2.10/hr in 1975, which is $9.9 now
in 2019 the minimal wage is $7.25

Well, $5.15 2.1 adjusted for inflation would be $24.33 9.9 today, so $15 number is not crazy.

Bob surely produces mixed messages (like paying 1% for 7 fig btc tx is OK, but $15/hr for MickeyD is too much).
The rich are different..., but I liked him more during drinking period...



703. Post 50565449 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on April 11, 2019, 11:22:13 PM
Bob surely produces mixed messages (like paying 1% for 7 fig btc tx is OK, but $15/hr for MickeyD is too much).

 I place value on having the peace of mind knowing I'm not likely to run into issues, and things will move smoothly for me.

 Same reason I hire accountants.
 Same reason I hire lawyers.
 Same reason I have people managing my portfolios.
 Same reason I hire people to do jobs that I'm not skilled at.
 Same reason I pay a slight premium at Gemini (not 1%) for my trades.

https://gemini.com/trading-fee-schedule/#trading-fee-schedule


 The point about a $15 wage demand at McDonalds, leading to workers being replaced with $35k kiosks, was an example of capitalism and the free market responding to stimulus.

OK, fine re McD.

Maybe I addressed a wrong person, and if so, I apologize, but I got a bit tired of multiple people here harping on labor.
Example: In Texas you can be fired for no cause and nobody needs to explain anything to you.
Additionally, it is legal in Texas to essentially rob temps of their wages by dismissing them earlier from their fully scheduled shift.
Thankfully, I am not a temp, but I did witness this on multiple occasions (via relative).



704. Post 50566087 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on April 12, 2019, 01:15:10 AM
A simple fact:

in 1975 the minimal wage was $5.15
in 2019 the minimal wage is $7.25

Well, $5.15 adjusted for inflation would be $24.33 today, so $15 number is not crazy.

Bob surely produces mixed messages (like paying 1% for 7 fig btc tx is OK, but $15/hr for MickeyD is too much).
The rich are different..., but I liked him more during drinking period...


I had to look this up bc I remember making 4.25 in high school decades after 1975.

Looks like minimum wage was 2.10 in '75.


I believe minimum wage is morally wrong because it makes it illegal for you to sell your labor for under a certain price. This prices out some people out of the work force against their will. I see it as somewhat useful in a fiat currency system where the workers are getting constant de facto pay cuts each day as the currency is debased through money printing. These workers cant negotiate pay raises fast enough to keep up with the de facto pay cuts.

When Bitcoin is the global reserve currency and all sane workers demand to be paid in Bitcoin, de facto pay cuts will be a thing of the past and minimum wage wont be useful at all. Workers will have all the bargaining power. Begging bosses or govs for raises each year wont be necessary as workers will have de facto pay raises as the currency gains value. When Bitcoin gains value too fast for some employers to successfully stay in business, then employers will have to come hat in hand and beg the workers to take less Bitcoin so they can stay in business.

This change in the power dynamic of employee/employer wage negotiation will usher in a prosperity the world has never witnessed.

6k soon.

Corrected (not sure where I got a source that was so wrong).
Labor is weak in US, however even super docile teachers were striking or threatening to do so in a bunch of southern states last year when they decided that they cannot take it anymore (even with the laws expressly prohibiting such strike).
IMHO, a state that is not taking proper care of education is doomed in the long run.



705. Post 50567081 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on April 12, 2019, 04:11:22 AM
I don't see the connection to the minimum wage, which is a function of productivity and income?

Historically, there was a connection between productivity and income, but it largely disappeared in the last 45 years or so.
These are the facts:
Productivity change 1973-2017: 77%
Hourly pay during the same period: 12.4%
https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/

I don't care what causes this, but it can't be sustainable much longer.



706. Post 50567188 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on April 12, 2019, 04:35:27 AM
I believe minimum wage is morally wrong because it makes it illegal for you to sell your labor for under a certain price.

Likely you misspoke, here.  Morally wrong and illegal are two different things.


Likely you misread Lambie... Minimum wages makes ilegal to work being paid less than that... and it is morally wrong to impose such limitation because it ends up in more unemployment and bars from working (and being paid *anything*) people that do not produce/deserve more than that. I do agree... with some reserves though.

I doubt that I misread or misunderstood Lambie...

Minimum wage brings an attempt at a balancing of interests, and sometimes those interests are not very well balanced, but whether something is immoral or illegal tend to be different questions, and sometimes might overlap.. but they are a bit different categories of consideration.
You seem to be misreading or misunderstanding quite a number of post. I've seen you do it with my own posts, with jbreher's posts and now with Lambie's post (even after your display of illiteracy was pointed out to you by bitserve). Perhaps spend more time reading and less time writing?

I don't see the connection to the minimum wage, which is a function of productivity and income?

Historically, there was a connection between productivity and income, but it largely disappeared in the last 45 years or so.
These are the facts:
Productivity change 1973-2017: 77%
Hourly pay during the same period: 12.4%
https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/

I don't care what causes this, but it can't be sustainable.
As far as the productivity gap goes. Workers are more productive because of the tools the business owners acquire for their use. As such, the numbers are inaccurate for any worker that does not buy their own tools to use in the business.

This does not explain why in 1950-1973 period two graphs coincided.
A simpler explanation would be that after 1973 economy get "financialized" and a larger slice of production gains (in %) went into the pocket of financiers, CEOs, etc.
Perhaps it is a natural law, but then 1789 is a natural law as well. Do we want a repeat? I hope, not.
Pauperizing workers cannot end in anything even remotely good down the pike.
Can it last another 50 years?
Maybe, but i hope to be out of the workforce, politics, etc one way or another well before that.



707. Post 50579333 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

fascinating story...this guy sees things in pixels and how this relates to the nature of reality?
Quote
Through Padgett’s eyes, the puddle is transformed into complex rippling patterns, overlapping and forming shapes like stars or snowflakes. And he wants everyone else to see what he sees.

Quote
“They found that I had access to parts of the brain that we don’t have conscious access to and also the visual cortex was working in conjunction with the part of the brain that does mathematics, which obviously makes sense,” says Padgett.

Simplest explanation is that he has a faulty circuit there, more complex explanation would be a doozy...

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20190411-the-violent-attack-that-turned-a-man-into-a-maths-genius

Perhaps, this guy should look at bitcoin charts and tell us the future (the right fractal).



708. Post 50603641 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on April 14, 2019, 05:31:05 PM
I voted yes because I can imagine us going as low as ~$3,800 (or ~$3,200, worst case) by Oct, at the lastest, for the final "big dip".

Incidentally, one of my favorite CT guys, @davthewave just posted this:



If the 2015 comparison holds true, we're in for the final retest of lows soon. It might be a good time to stock up an ammo to buy the last <$4,000 bitcoins, potentially.

Peter Brandt seems to be expecting the ~$3300 "big dip" too:

Big question re: analog year comparison is whether 10a rally will lead to 10b retest similar to 2013-2015 $BTC



Noooo.
This is all wrong.
'big dippers' are wrong and straight 'exponentials' are wrong.

It would be a unique structure, maybe, but not necessarily resembling 2013.
I already posted my graph variant here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg50479459#msg50479459

We will rise very sharply toward October then crash, most likely together with the stock market.
We might even marginally exceed ATH by then or get close to it.
After that it depends if we are in a 1987-like scenario, in which case btc would swiftly recover to ATH and keep going.
However, if we get to be in either 1929-1932 scenario or, more likely, Japan 1989-2009 economical scenario, bitcoin would suffer together with everything else.



709. Post 50604126 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on April 14, 2019, 06:43:34 PM
~snip~

Noooo.
This is all wrong.

~snip~

What do you think of this one?



I think that it is funny.

a graph was revealed,
willingly nonsensical,
a beautiful sight



710. Post 50604228 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: mindrust on April 14, 2019, 07:04:23 PM
Also voted yes.

Expecting at least one more dump and that'll be the one I am going to put lots of real money on btc. If it directly heads towards $50-100k without making that dump however, It is still fine by me but that's not what I expect.

That'll be the one I'll probably take my stack to double digits.

^^ could have two interpretations:
1. It dips and you increase your stack to double digits.
OR
2. It goes to 50-100K and you decrease your stack to double digits (from higher).

PS just kidding, I remember your posted numbers  Grin



711. Post 50604527 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on April 14, 2019, 07:14:18 PM
Heh, doesn't look very nonsensical to me.

Just kiddin',
You looked (a bit) offensive,
with your,
"Noooo. Tis all wrong.",
So I replied sarcastically.
But now,
that I've realized my mistake,
accept my apology,
in the shape of a merit!


hey, your response to my Sunday's haiku wasn't a haiku...
lol
Thanks



712. Post 50606593 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 14, 2019, 10:31:38 PM
I'm just going to leave this here :

Seasteader in legal troubles, platform to be removed......

https://www.bangkokpost.com/news/general/1661300/seastead-couple-in-crosshairs

Edit: He's possibly in very big trouble here if they proceed with the charges as mentioned.

The article suggests the Thais are willing to forget the whole thing if he tows it somewhere else.  Which seems to the simplest solution, albeit expensive in tow fees.

The harder question is where to tow it to.  

Somehow, reminds me of 01 in terms of yearning for new developments in how civilization works and the "old" order.
https://youtu.be/L0K6Cb1ZoG4?t=357



713. Post 50606870 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.41h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 14, 2019, 11:18:22 PM
Come on for title Smiley

For this to happen, 'robotic aliens' that are MC need to draw a game and LFC to keep winning.
A tall order, but I wish that it would happen.

Quote from: jbreher on April 14, 2019, 11:22:51 PM

Highly unfortunate development. I thought Elwar had tacit approval or acquiescence for the seastead. I wonder where the disconnect is.

he did not ask the commander of the navy, perhaps....not trying to make a joke, but in the end all local 'agreements' could be superseded by a higher authority.




714. Post 50620867 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: VB1001 on April 15, 2019, 09:22:47 PM
img snipped
https://twitter.com/jpthor__/status/1117599332193030144

"Bitcoin is currently in its buildup phase, slowly absorbing all fiat."

Nice, BTCitcoin is the King.

China wanted the next step to be their currency (yuan or RMB), hence this is why they mess with bitcoin so much.
That (next reserve being RMB) is not going to happen, sowwy.



715. Post 50621627 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: kingcolex on April 15, 2019, 11:09:52 PM
Norte Dame is in flames



I would like to see this properly investigated.
and
...sorry about your car wreck.
Around here people in trucks drive so aggressively that I mostly play defense (drive in the lane and not overtaking anyone).
I was thinking of buying Tesla, but their recent instability and price flip-flopping made me wait.



716. Post 50635978 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on April 16, 2019, 06:15:24 PM
Somewhere, deep in the spice-rich sands of the Arrakeen deserts, Shai-Hulud stirs.

Everyone here watched/liked pretty much the same movies (and/or books).
Someone needs to make a psych profile of a bitcoiner or, better, WO bitcoiner.

I predict: mostly well educated open-source participating technotrend gambler with a knack for 'scientific' explanation of his or her (less likely) theories.
Yet, it seems to work (long term).



717. Post 50637609 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Anybody know why coinbase (w/ or without pro) ACH deposit now takes 7 bd?
That's ridiculous. Used to be three days.



718. Post 50649312 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 17, 2019, 07:12:53 PM
@hueristic I hope your watching this game, just amazing 4 goals in 10 minutes WTF ??

Five in 21 min Huh!!
I hope that it would end here and "robots" are eliminated.



719. Post 50649645 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: mindrust on April 17, 2019, 07:51:50 PM

...who's going to pick up the trash?


eventually, robots...



720. Post 50650437 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 17, 2019, 07:34:38 PM
@hueristic I hope your watching this game, just amazing 4 goals in 10 minutes WTF ??

Five in 21 min Huh!!
I hope that it would end here and "robots" are eliminated.

Its just that Debruyne never underestimate Belgian injections Cheesy Grin

Great player, but he can't help it, 'robots' are out.
Now, hopefully LFC would win against Barcelona, sorry, Messi's fans.
LFC is too dynamic for them.
Could be a UK final, but I rather cheer for Ajax vs Tottenham.



721. Post 50650629 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

I have a question: why it has to happen EXACTLY as the last time?
In short: it doesn't and it won't.
Reason: every bitcoin bull market was different so far.

When I am thinking about btc, one number sticks out:

On average, each earthling can have only $0.00273 BTC (current price $14.26).
If you spend $1426 on btc right now (buying 0.273 BTC) and not buy anymore EVER, you would be a 'guaranteed' 1% (even less in reality due to some having large stashes) among all earthlings (not counting only those with btc).
Granted, you won't be rich right now, but in terms of btc, you would be in 1% class.
A pretty good hedge, if you ask me.

TL;DR Those 0.273 BTC are a pretty good hedge (in case btc would win).



722. Post 50677473 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: VB1001 on April 19, 2019, 06:19:46 PM
3% of American Retirees Own Some Bitcoin, While 33% Have No Idea What Bitcoin Is: Survey

https://cointelegraph.com/news/3-of-american-retirees-own-some-bitcoin-while-33-have-no-idea-what-bitcoin-is-survey

If I were in the United States, I would be part of the 3%, but with a difference, I am over 50 and I am not retired.

Waiting, fuckyourmoney. Cool

we have members of those 3% here, self described.
For certain (small) %% of people, age is mostly not a factor.
They keep going and learn new things well into their eighties, maybe slowing down in the nineties.



723. Post 50677586 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: zhekinsp on April 19, 2019, 07:07:29 PM
img clipped

For a friend, you do anything. Grin
Friends for life. Cheesy

is he delivering the guy to the porta potty?
more likely than not.
yes, friends do that...



724. Post 50677682 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on April 19, 2019, 07:16:59 PM
boss wants money
https://minerupdate.com/2019/04/17/belarus-president-proposes-giant-data-centre-for-bitcoin-mining/


the scramble for the last 16% of bitcoins ensues...
Bat'ka or Bat'ko (don't know which one is correct) would have to get in line...



725. Post 50682404 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: infofront on April 20, 2019, 03:03:20 AM
via Imgflip Meme Generator

Whole of BTC-world knows this story and everybody is with Elwar, just so Nice to read and to hear he’s ok....

GoGoGo Elwar and be safe!!!
Has a major media outlet picked it up yet?

I heard a story on NPR about it today.

I am surprised by a belligerent reaction to what is essentially building a floating house.
Not sure that I understand this.



726. Post 50697072 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Voted "yes', but would liked the question better if it was put in probabilistic terms (as chances for 20K).
In such case, I would put a 50% chance.

If btc would not get to 20K some shitcoin might be declared a new leader.
Hoards of "investors"/gamblers on Binance wouldn't know any better and would start chasing the rabbit.

Btc has moved too slow in 2019 (so far) in comparison to some (cough-ltc-cough).
I blame the futures.



727. Post 50697218 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: Retina on April 21, 2019, 01:58:29 AM
Quote

it is not possible to hit $20k because of $12k strong point still now so basically not possible.
Anyway, a huge of % BTCBTC reserved some BTC wallet when this BTCBTC in the market so Pump automatically.
waiting for Pumping BTCBTC

It would be funny to see similar poll if it was taken on April 20, 2017.



728. Post 50711073 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: kingcolex on April 21, 2019, 07:17:57 PM
good grief

we're all grumpy today
My wife is making me clean the whole fucking house, so yeah I'm peeved too.

haha...<...proceeds to remove bed sheets as instructed...>

BTW, all that trust thing is mostly for commerce between members, nothing more or less.



729. Post 50712647 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: mindrust on April 21, 2019, 08:18:17 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrGx0lhdNBY&t=11509s

I posted the stream earlier but surprisingly nobody here was interested in it.

I guess I am scared. Gonna wait a few months before I buy anything new. No more FOMO.

Nobody is interested because it is not a well thought out prediction.
You are scaring yourself silly with your own shadow.
Who gives what that annoying brat says anyway.



730. Post 50713863 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: Febo on April 21, 2019, 10:40:00 PM
China is Communist society system and capitalist economic system.

Irreconcilable and ultimately impossible.
Right now it is a contradictory system invented during Deng Xiaoping era, I agree, but clearly moving toward autocratic/communist (regressive) system.
Too many examples for this starting from increase in the role of state enterprises, social credits (yick!), etc.



731. Post 50714338 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on April 21, 2019, 11:58:00 PM
Keep accumulating during the bear markets & upgrading your level of sea life. Remember you have to start as a 'Plankton' before you become a 'Blue Whale'  Keep believing #Bitcoin will be the new financial paradigm. Your patience will be rewarded beyond your wildest imagination.

via Imgflip Meme Generator

https://twitter.com/proofofsteve/status/1119885149015904256?s=21

Perhaps in a foreseeable future, one is a blue whale with just a few coins Cheesy

He mixed up a bunch of Classes.
Unsound from a biological/systematic point of view.



732. Post 50728720 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

I did not even notice the yobit drama.
Some charts are like the stupid ads, though (especially the one depicting the crash from euphoria to despair, presumably indicatiing our collective status).
That and talk about beanie-babies.
Oh, well.



733. Post 50729976 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.42h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on April 22, 2019, 09:43:27 PM
https://twitter.com/woonomic/status/1120399815383425025
Quote
I surveyed notable influencers, analysts and traders for their probability that the bottom is in for this bear market. Here are the results:
<snip>

Notable comments:
@jespow - Bottom is never in.  Everything can go to 0.

@PeterLBrandt - 50% chance BTC goes to $50k. 25% chance we establish a very prolonged broad trading range for several years. 25% chance we go to basically zero.

Thanks to all that participated.

@jespow makes sense and @PeterBrandt does not as those percentages are totally whimsical.



734. Post 50732113 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: infofront on April 23, 2019, 03:13:45 AM


Tyler Jerkstore can go screw a light socket too!

Voted 76-80%, if anyone is interested.
That Tyler fella might be right...in the end, earth would be engulfed in flames of expanding sun (5 bil years, but life on Earth is projected to end in about 0.6-1bil years due to the loss of water caused by increase in solar activity)...and then there are galaxies running away from each other...and then matter disintegrating... black hole evaporating...so in a LOOONG term scenario, everything goes to zero.



735. Post 50745431 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

N. Popper wrote about bitcoin in NY Times (BTW, not a very well thought out piece).
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/23/technology/bitcoin-tulip-mania-internet.html

Read the discussion. Some are defending btc, but many are absolutely clueless, yet aggressive.



736. Post 50746325 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: bitserve on April 24, 2019, 03:28:46 AM
but I am still shocked by the extreme overreaction of Thailand over what was a ridiculously small boating thingy in the middle of the nothingness.

I thought so and still think that it was a overreaction.
The following hypothetical scenario occurred to me, though...

Imagine that once one structure is there, a shenzen factory starts mass producing such units and "stitch" them to each other, forming basically a colony near a country.
Later, they would "send" 100k people to live on those structures.
Then, how would they possibly deal with such development?

I don't think "independence" would work 13 miles away, unless some micronation actively encourages this.
Maybe some in Polynesia (more likely) and/or Caribbean (less likely).

Interesting story about chinese buying defunct ukranian aircraft carrier and rebuilding it.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/what-if-china-never-bought-ukraines-aircraft-carrier-and-rebuilt-it-32897
If there would be more for sale...then someone could make a 'seastead' in the middle of the Pacific.
IMHO, seasteading is a nonstarter when done in close proximity, as this case shows.



737. Post 50758872 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

The rise of "slashies" (people with multiple part time jobs).
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-47984295

I was one a couple of years back.
It's BS that most people like it. Basically, it is a rat race which in US is exacerbated by the absence of benefits (so you have to pay extra for them).
A full time job and a hobby (even involved hobby) is better, IMHO.
I wonder how crypto/btc will fit into this trend.

PS man city scores...foooook!



738. Post 50759933 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

I bought AAPL...sold way too early
I bought GOOG..sold way too early
I bought TSLA...sold way too early

did not sell btc yet...so there is a chanceTM

Quote from: bitserve on April 24, 2019, 09:44:10 PM

Another story it tells is that the "satoshi" that was posting here was just a SINGLE individual which is also consistent with his content, style, syntax and punctuation. It also shows that he had consistent/regular sleeping times. Probably a family man with a regular job.

haha...an amusing alternative theory...Satoshi is/was Dr. Jekyll and current personality is Mr Hyde.
Sidenote: i don't really believe in this theory, but split personalities do happen.



739. Post 50760019 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 24, 2019, 09:50:23 PM

Another story it tells is that the "satoshi" that was posting here was just a SINGLE individual which is also consistent with his content, style, syntax and punctuation. It also shows that he had consistent/regular sleeping times. Probably a family man with a regular job.

Asleep from 7am - 11am UTC which is 2am - 6am NY time.  

more like 6-12, which is 1am-7am NY or 10pm-4am Cali (or 11pm-5am Mountain time).
many finance people wake up at 5am (or even earlier) in cali/pacific to catch up the morning session in NY.



740. Post 50761280 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 24, 2019, 11:52:38 PM
Financial Analyst - Cryptocurrencies - SEC

$144k - $244k

https://www.crypto-careers.com/jobs/9999205-financial-analyst-cryptocurrencies-sec-at-u-s-securities-and-exchange-commission

gawd...this is one job that would bring ZERO benefit to our society.



741. Post 50775498 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: gentlemand on April 25, 2019, 11:28:16 PM
One Glastonbury the old crusties I was with got increasingly irate at my total indifference...

Aren't you a real RocknRolla then...
https://youtu.be/TdpR8VuvbCM?t=15

loved the movie, hope it gives some truth to an 'english character'.



742. Post 50789385 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Bloomberg reports that Etrade will also trade btc... soonish (ameritrade rumors were posted earlier).
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-26/e-trade-is-said-to-be-close-to-launching-cryptocurrency-trading

I am 'underinvested' in btc in my IRA.
'get off zero' would be noice.
Not buying UBER at $50, no siree.



743. Post 50798151 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 27, 2019, 02:48:43 PM

Long at $20k is a dumb explanation.

No one with any brains is long at $20k for 16 months without, at minimum, making some additional buys to bring down their average cost per BTC.

In other words, it should be quite difficult to sympathize with anyone who made that kind of dumb gambling move to buy at $20k and to sit on it without having further plans and action in the 16 months.

Edit:  By the way, you raised a bit of a different point, Hueristic, so we are deviating from the original point that I was attempting to make.  I went back to my original post, linked above, and for context, that post was questioning how it seems that so many people involved in such a greatly performing asset class, such as bitcoin, since 2013 are "poor."

Sometimes "poor" is a subjective, rather than objective status.
A guy losing 450 mil out of 500 mill might feel "poor", but he is not, objectively.
There was a dialogue about it in "Billions" where Ax talks to a hedge fund manager who is left with "just" 200 mil.
The opposite could be true too. Did everyone felt "rich" when we were about to climb over 20K?
I felt mostly bewildered.

Quote from: VB1001 on April 27, 2019, 04:33:24 PM
hats snipped

Boring afternoon, solution:
Sort the hats.
I will save and update the record now that it is created.

well, you are missing my hat for some reason.



744. Post 50812884 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

City dominates
bitcoin will recover soon
to make me happy



745. Post 50815653 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.43h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on April 28, 2019, 06:23:35 PM
Im Antlitz der aufgehenden Sonne
Stand ich frόhmorgens da
Mein Leib voller sόίer Wonne
Und gόldene bitcoins im Haar


Nice lyrics

...imagining Rammstein singing it (they make everything sound so 'tough")..  Grin



746. Post 50830401 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Looking at these dates, all I could say: darn it, I could have gotten into btc way earlier (as a few people here probably did).
First heard about it in Nov 2011 in the Wired article (BTC at $2), then totally forgot about it until October 2013 (BTC above $200) in the run-up.
The future is hopefully bright, but if someone gave me a choice of 100K now and flat for the next 10 years vs a 'slow" grind from 5K to 500K in 10 years, my choice would be the former.
I always preferred fast gains (and even losses) to a slow grind.
Perhaps, i don't have a patience for it.

why people did not invest early:
https://twitter.com/bitstein/status/1122195120340774912
an argument from 2011:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk5zs-hmVw4



747. Post 50830548 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on April 30, 2019, 01:39:51 AM
Our work here is done.

The high Necro has come fully over to the dark side and our cookies. Look..hes even point out shitcoins for us now.




https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1123033196642201600

wat da fook?



748. Post 50844612 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: d_eddie on May 01, 2019, 12:22:44 AM
This is the historical since the beginning of the thread WO:
+1 WOsMerit. Out of plain sM. Impressive job.
Anyone got a merit to spare here?

yes, merited VB 1001.



749. Post 50844631 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: John Abraham on May 01, 2019, 12:26:50 AM
20% of US aged 18-35 own Bitcoin.
https://twitter.com/ErikVoorhees/status/1123214419062689792

Imagine, if it's 40%  Cool



I would prefer if 40% of 50-60 year olds got to own it.
Two reasons;
1. they got much more money (on average).
2. they would mostly give such btc to 'youngsters' in due course, restricting spending of it for a while.



750. Post 50872763 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: dyask on May 02, 2019, 11:14:44 PM
 The value of gold though is completely base on the current scarcity of it.   Over then next decades the scarcity is likely to change a lot.  

The point on scarcity is correct because its already true, most of the gold mined was done in the last hundred years.   The obvious reason being the industrial revolution and the introduction of the combustion engine, of course the mining of gold increased massively.
So why isnt gold as cheap as hell, the price went up no doubt about it in any currency I've ever heard of.   Certainly sterling the oldest FIAT standard and originator via Newton of a gold standard the price altered massively from the old £1 gold coin exchanged (still made) and now £1 doesnt buy a snack.  
FIAT has exceeded the production of gold, its proven even easier to increase production. Another reason is the great population growth in the world, its not linear more like exponential growth and some view this as very negative.   I really dont as people can be gigantically productive and inventive and I rate people as an asset to any country but thats a personal view.   Gold divided among all these new people together with an ever greater bias to giant government and global corporations over the people as individuals and the origins of capitalism as capital and production with the people not the state, we have the result in gold price going up greatly and so far as I can tell will continue to go up for as long as Im around hence I hold it as capital.

What I really disagree with is the idea of gold or Bitcoin as if they oppose each other.   I'm not even going to discuss as it makes little sense, its like saying Bitcoin or live in your own house when both can be productive assets.    The argument to hold many assets not just one should be perfectly clear as we see great variation in Bitcoin, it doesnt invalidate it but it makes sense to have many options to stay stable personally

I don't disagree.   The current value of gold reflects the low value of FIAT.   I don't know if Bitcoin will replace gold or something else will or something all together different will happen.   I just expect a massive change, at least in the lifetime of my children if not my own.   Depending on the continued value of gold seems very risky.

I am hoping for bitcoin, but afraid that it would be something along 'likes" or "connections' or some other "social" credits.
Eeeww.



751. Post 50885427 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

W Buffett bought AAPL at $1tril valuation
W Buffett bought AMZN at $1tril valuation

There must be method in his...never mind.
He will buy BTC at $50-60K (~1 tril) or maybe when BTC price exceeds BRK-A (currently at $327,765/share).

Quote from: Last of the V8s on May 03, 2019, 08:29:25 PM
https://cryptoinsider.com/facebook-to-launch-project-libra-a-stablecoin-based-network/
good timing Grin

how bloody Orwellian this is, it's not even funny.



752. Post 50885459 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on May 03, 2019, 09:09:12 PM
W Buffett bought AAPL at $1tril valuation
W Buffett bought AMZN at $1tril valuation

There must be method in his...never mind.
He will buy BTC at $50-60K (~1 tril) or maybe when BTC price exceeds BRK-A (currently at $327,765/share)
Did he actually pay a $1t valuation for his shares though?

But yeah, seems like he's gotten old.

yeah as he is buying AMZN right now.



753. Post 50888255 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Mozilla (firefox) broke the adblockplus and almost all other add-ons.
https://twitter.com/mozamo/status/1124484255159971840

Don't want to use Chrome...yet.

BTW, those who like gold...
https://news.yahoo.com/two-neutron-stars-exploded-cosmic-212200086.html

Explains why we might have lots of gold and uranium (relatively speaking) in around solar system.

BTC: seems to hesitate around 5800



754. Post 50888536 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: Hueristic on May 04, 2019, 04:40:23 AM
Mozilla (firefox) broke the adblockplus and almost all other add-ons.
https://twitter.com/mozamo/status/1124484255159971840

Don't want to use Chrome...yet.

BTW, those who like gold...
https://news.yahoo.com/two-neutron-stars-exploded-cosmic-212200086.html

Explains why we might have lots of gold and uranium (relatively speaking) in around solar system.

BTC: seems to hesitate around 5800


Set your date back a few days and reload plugins until they fix it.

BTW, use Ublock Origins not adblock or plus.

My system date? It's on automatically. I can change that of course.
Why ublock instead of adblockplus?
I will wait and they would probably fix it overnight as they seem to be 'activating' devs to do this (even at a higher cost).
BTW, the ancient Firefox 48 is NOT affected and work with maybe 99% of sites.
Keeping something older in house (just in case).



755. Post 50895336 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

How everything is connected:

1. It is difficult to buy btc miners in US because of a 27.6% tariff (including 25% Trump's tariff on Chinese miners).

2. it is possible that this would go away because of negotiations.

3. Why negotiations might succeed? For one part it is because China would need to import LOTS of food items soon.

4. Why? because they have a problem:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-02/pig-ebola-virus-sends-shock-waves-through-global-food-chain



756. Post 50930040 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.44h):

Quote from: rhomelmabini on May 07, 2019, 02:50:03 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDH-vJx5Ong Vincent Kompany Goal
what a kunt
sorry lads

The so called luck some of the time it happens. Let that be at first for play's of the week.

Too bad that it is almost NOT possible to have a playoff (LFC has to draw the last game and MC has to lose by four).
That scenario just not going to happen.
LFC could still win it, but it is a long shot now.



757. Post 50956779 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: AlexGR on May 08, 2019, 01:47:34 PM

I read the above and still don't get the problem. What type of address was needed before sending to Bech32 and why was it unspendable? And how can it be unspendable if it is sent back to the company's wallet and thus "proves" it's an inside job?


My understanding is that if you send coins from address starting with '1' (legacy) to bech 32 address (starting with 'bc1'), then you might have difficulty spending the coins, although I am not 100% sure because Coinomi claims that in their wallet you can "upgrade" legacy account to bech32.
In any case, if you send from '1 to '3' first, then to 'bc1', it should be OK.
Read here:

https://coinomi.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/29000009746-what-are-default-compatibility-and-legacy-addresses-all-about-segwit-

Re sending back at Binance-it is a puzzle and if true (I did not check), then the whole thing is definitely their own error.
That guy at binance...I would not listen to one word outta his mouth one way or another any more.



758. Post 50968318 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: fluidjax on May 08, 2019, 10:51:50 AM

What CZ@Binance wants,  or when miners want to fork, doesn't matter. They are free to do as they wish.
UASF & 2X was the watershed, when the power was ultimately confirmed to be in the hands of the holders.


"hodlers" have absolutely no power in POW as long as they don't run a node.
UASF does not mean that some dude with btc has the power.
If you think that he has, then you are describing a POS system and even in that system you need to actively 'stake' your stash.
Holding a trezor with btc on the POW system like bitcoin does not make you a "user" in the meaning of UASF.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 09, 2019, 02:56:15 PM
So I like green dildo's as much as the next guy ..   ( wow, the ways THAT could be taken out of context...)

But I'm starting to get just slightly concerned we may be moving to fast..  anyone besides me getting that feeling?

50% increase in less than 2 months....

We're not in the parabolic mode quite yet.. but it does seem to me we are heading there quite fast..   I'd really like to see at least month or two bouncing around in the low 6xxx range before our next serious step up...

to fast, to soon means we hit a blow off top that is to low to hit my retirement target..  that would... annoy me....

I know that if you look at the last 5 weeks or so, starting from our April 1, break through $4,200, it appears that there has been a bit much in regards to price appreciation.. but bitcoin does these kinds of things.  It is not out of the ordinary.

First of all, there is almost no fucking way that bitcoin is getting to any kind of new ATH within the 10 months (if that is what you mean by "retirement target"), so in that regard, we should expect a decent number of 30% plus corrections between here and $20k... but even going from here to $20k is more than a 3x price appreciation, so in order to return to $20k (which is NOT an unreasonable expectation) we should be anticipating both periods of seeming froth that goes along with correction, and also the fact that sometimes the seeming froth is not really froth, but just getting back to previous price points (let's say in the $6k range), and maybe we could see a 50% or more price appreciation from here before any meaningful correction in the 30% plus arena takes place.

In other words, it is almost pie in the sky for any experienced bitcoiner to really be expecting any kind of smooth sailing (or that infamously unrealistic word, "stability") between here and $20k and beyond, including likely ongoing emotional turmoil.

I am not "expecting" it, but it is possible if we are on a "hockey stick" of btc adoption.
Roughly: we almost doubled in less than 6 mo. If we are already on an exponent, then 12K could come in 3 mo, then 24K in another 1.5 mo, projecting 24K in 4.5 mo or by October 2019.
If we are on a linear rapid growth starting with the surge from 4K, then we might reach about 10K by November, then probably pause.
I give the first scenario 10-20% probability and the second one 40-50% probability.
The third scenario (where we pause at 6K)-maybe 30-50% probability.



759. Post 50968650 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on May 09, 2019, 03:20:24 PM

Henichesk?  On the beach maybe?

more like Kyrylivka if the dot position is correct (in any case, it is Ukraine on or close to the Sea of Azov beach).



760. Post 50976729 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on May 10, 2019, 03:43:13 AM


"hodlers" have absolutely no power in POW as long as they don't run a node.

This is not strictly true, if they leave en-masse then the price will no longer be as supported and the mining will become less profitable and the networks security will suffer as a result.

More accurate to say it is completely untrue. Market votes with its feet and I love to dump shit forks.

My original post has NOTHING to do with forks.
If you want to maintain that by hodling you are actually UASFing, be my guest...it is a rather harmless "delusion of crowds".



761. Post 50992265 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Well, some people were saying that it can't happen...now maybe it can (we did not even had the wiggle so far Wink:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg50479459#msg50479459
followed by
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg50603641#msg50603641



762. Post 50998943 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: mindrust on May 11, 2019, 06:58:49 AM
I increased my BTC stash by... wait for it...

% fucking 50.

I would call it a win.

One More Thing: FUCK TONE VAYS SIDEWAYS

Right on ...and <> Tone vays and also the new bull murad who was spewing nonsense for half a year  or more prior.
Not going to listen to these two. They are in the same category of "WRONG" as Vinny L.
HM and Toxic2040 here and Peter Brandt outside...good vibes.



763. Post 50999959 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: fillippone on May 11, 2019, 04:24:24 PM


Ok, back of the envelope calculations:

Market capitalization of listed domestic companies (current US$): 65.66 Trillion USD : 65,660,000 Million USD
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/cm.mkt.lcap.cd

Bitcoins in circulations: 17,700,000
https://www.blockchain.com/charts/total-bitcoins

Hence follows:
Tim Draper's prediction: 1BTC=3,700,000 USD


HODL!



Not sure how the market share of EARTH can be calculated, as it is definitely not the stock market only.
If you take ALL markets (sans derivatives), then it is about 200-240 tril.
5% of 200 tril is 10tril or about 500-600K/btc.



764. Post 51002259 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on May 11, 2019, 06:06:23 PM
Dumb cunt Leah Wald and retard Grandpa Tyler Jenks lost a Bitcoin in a bet today.  Grin Grin

Leah - "I don't like those terms but I am willing to entertain your action @filbfilb. @LucidInvestment and I are willing to bet 1 BTC that price trades below $1,500 on Bitstamp before it trades above $6,500."

https://twitter.com/LeahWald/status/1102736805168902144

HYPER-RECT!

She is a former World bank econimist...what else did you expect.
Lucidinvestment never made any sense with his hyperwave ideation.



765. Post 51003946 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: gentlemand on May 11, 2019, 10:08:19 PM
I think I've officially diagnosed myself as gun shy now. This sort of popping makes me uneasy rather than aroused.

BFX is now $1-200 cheaper than elsewhere.

yeah, be bullish when most are bearish, be <locally> bearish when everyone is bullish?
However, is everyone bullish? Not yet.
Proportion of shorts is declining (probably being simply liquidated), yet they are still way above mid April lows.
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=BITFINEX:BTCUSDSHORTS

It's nice that the pump was from Friday night to Saturday, otherwise I would had difficulty to work yesterday  Grin



766. Post 51004022 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on May 11, 2019, 10:17:34 PM
No more toying with the bears, tonight we hit 10k Cheesy

please, no, that would be supra-supra exponential...will leave a hole in the ceiling, lol.

$7050... any more 7050...7075 to the gentleman with a rain coat...any one 7080....7085 to the lady with a scarf...7099 anyone...7135 to a gentleman with tinted glasses...
Feels like an auction house...could it be that the market sniffed out some news (ETF?)



767. Post 51004154 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: Torque on May 11, 2019, 10:28:58 PM
But...bbut.... I #deleteCoinbase just like u said 2 Huh Guyzzz Huh

Coinbase cannot help you here, unless you already have cash there, otherwise you'll have to wait.
Gemini, on the other hand, allows trading as soon as you sent ACH.



768. Post 51004910 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on May 11, 2019, 11:05:41 PM
Institutions prefer to buy direct from miners due to anti-money laundering / tainted coins concerns. A 10% premium for freshly minted coins is apparently not uncommon.

That limits the amount of coins available for sale to institutions

This is just a dumb ass nocoiner (ignoramus) behavior.
When institution is buying from, say, Coinbase, prior history is of little (or no) concern since it is all going to a pool, from which Coinbase gives you your btc.
But, if they want to overpay, this is on them.



769. Post 51019243 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: jojo69 on May 12, 2019, 05:29:43 PM
No one wants to see the price gallop away and explode.

Well...

I think we might be able to scrounge up one or two dissenters.

seconded



770. Post 51021375 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on May 12, 2019, 10:22:47 PM
Agree with you there JJG, no $20,000 breach until at least 12 months, probably 18 months. Moon is in sight though & we’ll get there.

How many times did I hear we didn't where gonna see 7xxx this year ........ trying to predict the price is just impossible as just wastin e of time trying Smiley

F***  20K could happen in 1-2-3 weeks if BTC want it to be so!!! Cheesy

Closing in to HODLsleep


It's impossible, but then... it happens.
IDK.. if we are mini-bubbling here, then we could finish at around 10K, then down to 7k or even 6K (within 2-3 mo), but then pop all the way to 25-34K a la 2013 "double-pop" style.
PS: funny, I posted this without looking and now I see that masterluc (in infofront's translation) said more or less the same.



771. Post 51021442 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.45h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on May 12, 2019, 10:34:28 PM
This dump was expected. Let's see if it extends further or not.

Win-win situation, I love it! I tried to do the same with a little part of my holdings (about 5%) yesterday, which is totally stuck in Binance for now. Sold at $7400 and thought the same thing, "if bitcoin goes down, I'll buy back from this USDC bag, if it doesn't go down, I still win with my remaining holdings". But then I bought back the BTC (FOMO'ed at the dump) at $6800 as I liked the little 0.03 BTC profit off that Binance bag.

Based on what you've just posted, your holdings must be around 6.8 BTC. Not a small amount, well done!

Keep HoDLing!

[...I just love playing with numbers...]

Oh wow! That number is extremely close to my overall portfolio worth. We've got some nice mathematicians in this thread, I wasn't aware of that! Cheesy

Honestly, ADA played a big role in getting me to that number; if ADA hadn't pumped as it did, I'd have been struggling at ...

kidding aside...that's a historical record as long as bitcointalk lives, tread carefully.
This could be worth, say, $6.8-68 mil sometime in the future, give or take.



772. Post 51021728 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Voted 8.5K-9K...too bullish, I know, I like to take unnecessary risks  Wink



773. Post 51023739 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Not about bitcoin...
micg is in the hodlrest, but I still don't want to give out anything but a vibe on GOT.

The last two episodes counting todays's were the dumbest, least nuanced episodes of the whole show.
I hope that the final would make up for this...disappointed (at the moment).



774. Post 51035451 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: Wekkel on May 13, 2019, 05:40:16 PM
10k in 48 hours please kind Pump Masters  Cheesy

Time to sell some, a retracement to $6000-6500 or lower in...3...2...1. We're still in a bear market.

We would need to go under 3100 to prove this is a bear market. 6k retrace would just be a bull market correction. Wink

Bull Markets dont start with the (<snipped>Party first.

Bear market rallies usually are the fiercest.

But I will hold my tongue and let everyone enjoy the moment.

True about bear market rallies, NOT true about bull markets.
1982-2000 US stocks bull market started ferociously: 40% jump in less than 3 mo, check it out.
The rule is...there are no rules.
I agree that it is a bit too vertical, but it is a SMALL market.



775. Post 51037150 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: toknormal on May 13, 2019, 10:40:12 PM
If you throw in a century of economic growth then 9 digits could be plausible as well as follows:

Suppose Bitcoin absorbs 10% of M2 and the M2 growth rate of roughly 4% persists for a century.

That would imply 1.04^100 = 50.5x growth over 100 years.

That would bring the 10% estimate from 3m per Bitcoin to 151.5m per Bitcoin 100 years from now.


These kind of valuations are highly flawed. If bitcoin ever absorbed even a fraction of "M2" growth it would be largely as a pure unit of account, not a store of value. In other words you'd (by definition of M2) be talking about BTC denominated bank deposit accounts and money market funds and all kinds of other fractional reserve derivatives.

Use of bitcoin as a unit of account is something hodlers tend to ignore. If bitcoin ever became a currency we would not be exchanging actual bitcoins, but bitcoin denominated credit just as we use arbitrary units of credit today. So you can't just divide random incumbent money supply figures by 21 million to get a price for a future BTC. Since it's limited in supply it's an asset and will always be an asset.

If you denominate, say, UK GDP in bitcoin then it's around 0.3 Trillion BTC. The GDP can be 0.3 Trillion BTC even though there are not that many bitcoins in existence.


Maybe flawed, but only partially. If bonds are issued, then this is not a unit of account, but an actual asset that contributes to the overall size of assets, is it not?
Bond market in US is 82tril, global-above 100 tril.
I can redeem a bond and get currency/cash.

Analogy: water in the lake is still a part of water present on planet earth.



776. Post 51037349 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: toknormal on May 13, 2019, 11:06:38 PM
If you throw in a century of economic growth then 9 digits could be plausible as well as follows:

Suppose Bitcoin absorbs 10% of M2 and the M2 growth rate of roughly 4% persists for a century.

That would imply 1.04^100 = 50.5x growth over 100 years.

That would bring the 10% estimate from 3m per Bitcoin to 151.5m per Bitcoin 100 years from now.


These kind of valuations are highly flawed. If bitcoin ever absorbed even a fraction of "M2" growth it would be largely as a pure unit of account, not a store of value. In other words you'd (by definition of M2) be talking about BTC denominated bank deposit accounts and money market funds and all kinds of other fractional reserve derivatives.

Use of bitcoin as a unit of account is something hodlers tend to ignore. If bitcoin ever became a currency we would not be exchanging actual bitcoins, but bitcoin denominated credit just as we use arbitrary units of credit today. So you can't just divide random incumbent money supply figures by 21 million to get a price for a future BTC. Since it's limited in supply it's an asset and will always be an asset.

If you denominate, say, UK GDP in bitcoin then it's around 0.3 Trillion BTC. The GDP can be 0.3 Trillion BTC even though there are not that many bitcoins in existence.


Maybe flawed, but only partially. If bonds are issued, then this is not a unit of account, but an actual asset that contributes to the overall size of assets, is it not?
Bond market in US is 82tril, global-above 100 tril.
I can redeem a bond and get currency/cash.

Analogy: water in the lake is still a part of water present on planet earth.

In theory it works like that but in practice it doesn't. Even in the Bretton Woods system there was a "notional" convertibility to gold. But there was still far more currency in circulation than there was gold in existence. The value of gold was simply pegged to a multiple of the dollar ($30 I think).

Lets say you had 1 bitcoin and you issued a bitcoin backed bond. You now have 2 effective bitcoins in circulation - the real one and the bond. The original doesn't cease to exist just because it's backing a bond. Similarly, crypto exchanges inflate the bitcoin money supply. We deposit our bitcoin on exchanges and they create these "synthetic" bitcoins for us to trade. Meanwhile the deposited BTC are still in circulation on the blockchain.

People tend to think that they're "locked away" and out of circulation, but they're not. The new synthetic ones are added to the supply. The exchange can do what they want with the deposits - it just depends on the contractural terms.

So the "21 million" limit is not really a limit. The bitcoin supply can be expanded in an unlimited way and will be simply through its use as a pure unit of account, same as any other asset.


I actually agree with this reasoning...and this happening eventually.
I would think, however, that such derivative bitcoins would be limited in number (maybe 3-10 times more, but not 100-1000 times more).
Maybe they would not even be called bitcoins, but something else.
Beforehand, btc rose rapidly upon learning about upcoming futures on CBOE/CME, then declined.
A similar scenario might be unfolding here: a rapid rise into BAKKT (in July), then some retreat, a temporal one, perhaps.



777. Post 51056727 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

While solidly behind bitcoin, I cannot be at the position of "only bitcoin forever".
Here is my purely behavioristic argument:

1. Wall Street (WS) largely "missed" bitcoin as more than 84% is already issued with very small (anecdotally) institutional ownership.

2. WS knows how to do "promotions".

3. Would it be easier for WS to promote a new token/coin/entity that is not almost fully subscribed yet vs the one that is already owned? I think that the answer is "probably, yes"

4. WS don't like chasing, but they do like sweet early deals.

Conclusion: BTC will be pushed first and will dramatically appreciate, but then the momentum might switch to "shitcoins".
Which ones's?
IMHO, the one's that are under-issued: XRP (since Ripple can make sweet deals at 40C now with appreciation later), watch out for Ripple issuing billions of coins from their 66 bil "stash", maybe ZEC as only 6mil out of 21 mil were mined so far. Don't want to mention newcomers, but watch out for large tranches of coins being allocated to WS hedge funds and institutions from some new and upcoming chains.

Personally, I don't think that ethereum would show large appreciation due to much competition in the area (POS) where it wants to compete.

One can, hopefully, design a strategy where potential profits in "shitcoins" would be transferred to bitcoin in due course.
I don't intend to sell any bitcoin (and certainly not for shitcoins), hopefully, until retirement or some unforeseen urgency, but some cash allocation along the lines that were mentioned above could be interesting. We shall see.




778. Post 51057148 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: erre on May 15, 2019, 05:47:28 AM
While solidly behind bitcoin, I cannot be at the position of "only bitcoin forever".
Here is my purely behavioristic argument:

1. Wall Street (WS) largely "missed" bitcoin as more than 84% is already issued with very small (anecdotally) institutional ownership.

2. WS knows how to do "promotions".

3. Would it be easier for WS to promote a new token/coin/entity that is not almost fully subscribed yet vs the one that is already owned? I think that the answer is "probably, yes"

4. WS don't like chasing, but they do like sweet early deals.

Conclusion: BTC will be pushed first and will dramatically appreciate, but then the momentum might switch to "shitcoins".
Which ones's?
IMHO, the one's that are under-issued: XRP (since Ripple can make sweet deals at 40C now with appreciation later), watch out for Ripple issuing billions of coins from their 66 bil "stash", maybe ZEC as only 6mil out of 21 mil were mined so far. Don't want to mention newcomers, but watch out for large tranches of coins being allocated to WS hedge funds and institutions from some new and upcoming chains.

Personally, I don't think that ethereum would show large appreciation due to much competition in the area (POS) where it wants to compete.

One can, hopefully, design a strategy where potential profits in "shitcoins" would be transferred to bitcoin in due course.
I don't intend to sell any bitcoin (and certainly not for shitcoins), hopefully, until retirement or some unforeseen urgency, but some cash allocation along the lines that were mentioned above could be interesting. We shall see.



So, you are basically saying "buy ripple" because it's centralized bank money?

Not cool bro...



Pal, if you have CASH and use it, then you already have centralized bank money, lol
I am not giving an advice of what to buy, just looking at it from a cost-benefit angle.

Don't spend bitcoin, but if you have cash (aka centralized bank money as we established already, and after you did not spend your cash on btc in the next year or so), then it could be profitable.
Or not. Make your own decisions.





779. Post 51065970 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on May 15, 2019, 02:07:31 PM
An OG with 50k coins will have more power than most countries do now.
~150 of them will have half the world's wealth.
By far the most people will not have any money at all.
Bitcoin will bring about a new feudal technocracy.
But first, complete chaos.

That very well may be, but how exactly would you exert that wealth without spending precious bitcoin and thereby reducing your bitcoin stash?
Bitcoin lending? Why would some lend a deflationary asset? Borrowing cash against your btc stash? That can turn ugly at 80% drawdown.
Bitcoin interest-a ridiculous idea that is not even practical without someone rehypothecating bitcoin, which should be a bad habit.
I am close to 100% certain that blockFi will kick the bucket at one point or another.



780. Post 51066209 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: kenzawak on May 15, 2019, 06:22:03 AM


Is it a scene from the future "Housewives of Beverly Hills" episode?

There are currently only 2.8-3.5 mil btc owners with more than 1 BTC.
I doubt that there will be many more.
Compare it to more than 40mil millionaires in the World and about 5 million millionaires with wealth above 5mil (3.2885 mil with wealth of $5-10mil).
So, basically, having ONE btc is the equivalent (in rarity) of having $5-10mil in fiat wealth.

https://medium.com/@BambouClub/are-you-in-the-bitcoin-1-a-new-model-of-the-distribution-of-bitcoin-wealth-6adb0d4a6a95
+ google global wealth report, there is a pdf link there.



781. Post 51066265 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: kingcolex on May 15, 2019, 04:37:18 PM
An OG with 50k coins will have more power than most countries do now.
~150 of them will have half the world's wealth.
By far the most people will not have any money at all.
Bitcoin will bring about a new feudal technocracy.
But first, complete chaos.

That very well may be, but how exactly would you exert that wealth without spending precious bitcoin and thereby, reducing your bitcoin stash?
Bitcoin lending? Why would some lend a deflationary asset? Borrowing cash against your btc stash? That can turn ugly at 80% drawdown.
Bitcoin interest-a ridiculous idea that is not even practical without someone rehypothicating bitcoin, which should be a bad habit.
I am close to 100% certain that blockFi will kick the bucket at one point or another.
You could do lending  crypto to crypto with a smart contract with assets put on the line as collateral but of course this would need to be all cleared by the government as binding before anyone would risk it.

Yes, my point is that you cannot do anything without spending or somehow lending it out, so OGs will have difficulty influencing much, unless some secondary markets develop.



782. Post 51066393 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: kingcolex on May 15, 2019, 04:57:18 PM
An OG with 50k coins will have more power than most countries do now.
~150 of them will have half the world's wealth.
By far the most people will not have any money at all.
Bitcoin will bring about a new feudal technocracy.
But first, complete chaos.

That very well may be, but how exactly would you exert that wealth without spending precious bitcoin and thereby, reducing your bitcoin stash?
Bitcoin lending? Why would some lend a deflationary asset? Borrowing cash against your btc stash? That can turn ugly at 80% drawdown.
Bitcoin interest-a ridiculous idea that is not even practical without someone rehypothicating bitcoin, which should be a bad habit.
I am close to 100% certain that blockFi will kick the bucket at one point or another.
You could do lending  crypto to crypto with a smart contract with assets put on the line as collateral but of course this would need to be all cleared by the government as binding before anyone would risk it.

Yes, my point is that you cannot do anything without spending or somehow lending it out, so OGs will have difficulty influencing much, unless some secondary markets develop.
They could buy stock in Volkswagen as they own Lamborghini and that shits going to spike. That might be a safe bet actually 😉

LOL..so that 2008 superspike in Volkswagen stock was maybe a premonition of things to come? JK
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-volkswagen/short-sellers-make-vw-the-worlds-priciest-firm-idUSTRE49R3I920081028



783. Post 51066602 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Oh, boy.
20-year old is "jumping the shark".
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/if-youre-not-a-billionaire-in-10-years-its-your-own-fault-says-20-year-old-bitcoin-tycoon-2019-05-14

Of note, marketwatch refers to a person with 450 btc as a "tycoon".



784. Post 51068139 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: 600watt on May 15, 2019, 06:46:36 PM
An OG with 50k coins will have more power than most countries do now.
~150 of them will have half the world's wealth.
By far the most people will not have any money at all.
Bitcoin will bring about a new feudal technocracy.
But first, complete chaos.

That very well may be, but how exactly would you exert that wealth without spending precious bitcoin and thereby, reducing your bitcoin stash?
Bitcoin lending? Why would some lend a deflationary asset? Borrowing cash against your btc stash? That can turn ugly at 80% drawdown.
Bitcoin interest-a ridiculous idea that is not even practical without someone rehypothicating bitcoin, which should be a bad habit.
I am close to 100% certain that blockFi will kick the bucket at one point or another.
You could do lending  crypto to crypto with a smart contract with assets put on the line as collateral but of course this would need to be all cleared by the government as binding before anyone would risk it.

Yes, my point is that you cannot do anything without spending or somehow lending it out, so OGs will have difficulty influencing much, unless some secondary markets develop.
They could buy stock in Volkswagen as they own Lamborghini and that shits going to spike. That might be a safe bet actually 😉

LOL..so that 2008 superspike in Volkswagen stock was maybe a premonition of things to come? JK
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-volkswagen/short-sellers-make-vw-the-worlds-priciest-firm-idUSTRE49R3I920081028


bitcoin was the second time in my life that i tried to invest in something. first time was ... well... the dotcom bubble. i had $10k to invest, went to my bank and told i want to invest in tech companies. my banker gave me a list of stocks he would recommend. i invested $9k in internet stocks and told him i want to put $1k in something as far away from internet stocks as possible. he did not like that idea and tried to talk me out of it. i insisted and picked volkswagen. wasn΄t a hot stock at that time, the banker shook his head.
a few days later the dot com bubble bursts and within just a few days my portfolio went down from $10k to $1k (the VW shares did not move a bit), all tech stock i had was worth only pennies. i bought the very very top of a multiyear bubble. man, i got so mad. i swore to myself i would fucking hold that those vw shares until they 10folded, so i would come out clean.   everyone told me it was a stupid idea because stocks of car companies never 10fold. 8 years later (!) the vw shares made a sudden 10fold and i sold right away. the banker never looked into my eyes again and i had learned a big lesson.
when i bought my first bitcoin it again was at the very top of a bubble. bitcoin started a 90% nose dive one day after i bought.
i still own the dot com bubble stock. still worth only pennies. in harsh contrast to the btc i bought.

What a cool story, thanks...
I first made quite well on internet stocks (being an investment newbie back then), then lost almost EVERYTHING, apart from money I cashed out during 1997-2001 on family expenses and a house downpayment. Had to rebuild my stocks back from a low number, mostly in retirement accounts, but, hey, I got a house out of it back then.
The propensity for "risky" bets reared it's head again with btc, lol.



785. Post 51068168 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: Pamoldar on May 15, 2019, 07:02:14 PM

BTC breaking out.
$8,247!!!

kawabangaaa!



786. Post 51068373 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on May 15, 2019, 07:06:44 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4919568.msg51068122#msg51068122
 Grin then  Sad

His other scenarios (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4919568.msg51061990#msg51061990) are quite reasonable, but the one above is a bit hard to believe even as a possibility.
Albeit, who knows.



787. Post 51100684 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.46h):

Bitcoin continues to be too volatile due to low liquidity and too much leverage.
I don't see a need for the 100X leverage, but it is up to Mister Market to put a possible end to that.

VanEck-don't really care much.
Each share would be $178K (25 BTC) if it is approved. Not enough "granularity".

It's more likely to re-test 6200 than to go up short term, IMHO.
Not pleased.

RE whale: maybe it was Kobayashi again? Not likely, though.



788. Post 51113061 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on May 18, 2019, 06:11:48 PM
Bob started in 2011?  Years earlier.  

FWIW, started GPU-mining in June 2011.

Solo CPU-mined a few entire blocks, as curiosities, about six months prior to that.

Wow. No need for ASIC mining, then, LOL.
The only time this (full blocks mining solo) was possible later on was in eth in late 2015-early 2016.
Now Bob mines Grin (self-described).
However, Grin already accumulates slowly, though, and is inherently dilutive, so I am also doing it just for fun, no chance to make bank there.

I many ways, early btc/eth mining/buying was like venture capital investment. Some dude put in 100K in early Google and ended up with more than 1 bil worth of stock.
Blocks of 50 BTC at 10c were more like a computer game, probably, but it certainly pays to be a visionary when something formidable (like BTC or Google) materializes later on.
Kudos.



789. Post 51113285 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: Hueristic on May 18, 2019, 07:09:22 PM
Quote
Bitstamp Starts Investigation After Large BTC Sell Leads to $250 Mln Liquidated on BitMEX

https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitstamp-starts-investigation-after-large-btc-sell-leads-to-250-mln-liquidated-on-bitmex

They need to investigate themselves as to why they accept a limit sell order 2000 points below the market price.
That kind of order (not a market sell) should be simply rejected by the trading system (as an error).



790. Post 51114029 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on May 18, 2019, 08:11:43 PM
Quote
Bitstamp Starts Investigation After Large BTC Sell Leads to $250 Mln Liquidated on BitMEX

https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitstamp-starts-investigation-after-large-btc-sell-leads-to-250-mln-liquidated-on-bitmex

They need to investigate themselves as to why they accept a limit sell order 2000 points below the market price.
That kind of order (not a market sell) should be simply rejected by the trading system (as an error).


It sounds suspiciously like you are suggesting something like curbs or circuit breakers be put in place. Is that really the direction we want to go?


No, not curbs, but if someone fat fingered $6200 limit price sell when market is at $8200, such order is typically automatically rejected on all respectable exchanges (I am not talking only about crypto).
That is not a curb of any sort. I have no problem with that order if it was a market order and it just went down because of low liquidity.
BTW, coinbase pro would not even accept a limit buy order at the ask price or above it. Same (in reverse aka below bid) with a sale, I assume.



791. Post 51114209 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on May 18, 2019, 08:26:38 PM
F*** b00ze is talking

You and me both, buddy.

Crazy weather here. Tornado Warning in effect until 5pm or so, but I think the worst is behind us.

Thinking of eating 1g of mushrooms and see how that hits me for the evening.

Life is good.

A tornado could take me out in the next 15 minutes, and I would die a happy man.

Hodl.

EDIT: Not sure if Mushrooms + Beer is a good combo, so considering holding off to tomorrow

Hang it there, pal.
Sounds lame, but I think that told you before that Dallas has tornadoes, strangely enough.
Houston have hurricanes and tropical storms.
In Texas, Austin is optimal since it has a river, hills, less humidity, no hurricanes and younger population.
RE prices are rising, but still ridiculously cheap by Cali measures.
My choices for later (maybe when retired): Oregon, Vancouver, Colorado, Austin and Canary Islands, not necessarily in that order.



792. Post 51114804 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

I am sorry, but the unfortunate conclusion is that BTC markets are still shitty (which is true at least for bitstamp).
IMHO, crypto markets need to link up and distribute liquidity (split the order routing automatically into multiple exchanges in a situation like this).

Example: $35 mil order of a $143.5 bil asset is just 0.024% of the asset value.
It is the same as if someone would place a sell order of $211 mil in AAPL stock.
Do you think that AAPL would go down 24% as a result?
Of course, not.



793. Post 51115317 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

A ranch for an OG bitcoiner in 2030-2035 (with btc, hopefully, at 7 figures current $ values);

https://www.landsofamerica.com/property/40138-acres-in-Val-Verde-County-Texas/5160408

Low, low $27 mil for a 40 thou acre ranch. This looks almost like a small country.



794. Post 51115943 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

kudos to bitcoin,
it made the last few years still
more interesting



795. Post 51126930 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

A wild theory: btc is being held below 8K so Van Eck ETF would be slightly below $200000/share once approved.
This would allow a nice appreciation from the get go to exceed the stock market price flagship (BRK-A) at $306355.
Nah...I don't really believe this, but I do think that the approval or move toward approval is 50:50 this time around (at least definitely higher than 10:90).



796. Post 51130714 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 19, 2019, 10:19:32 PM
A wild theory: btc is being held below 8K so Van Eck ETF would be slightly below $200000/share once approved.
This would allow a nice appreciation from the get go to exceed the stock market price flagship (BRK-A) at $306355.
Nah...I don't really believe this, but I do think that the approval or move toward approval is 50:50 this time around (at least definitely higher than 10:90).

I think that it is higher than 10:90 too, but 50:50?  Do you really believe that is the approval likelihood?  And if a large number of others believe that the probability that the odds, this time, are 50:50, then that would give further explanation to BTC's current bullish posture... Personally, I don't believe that people (let's say "smart money") believes that an ETF has anywhere near 50:50 odds of approval...,, even if they believe the odds are becoming higher than 10:90.

Some unknown, but substantial probability, hence we popped 1000 points straight up as we approach the date.
If not, i can see us losing 500-800 points easily.
I wouldn't suggest going 100X or even 5X in any direction, lol.



797. Post 51132243 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

I think that conversing about alts distracts (for the most part) from bitcoin, which is the topic here.
Very infrequently it might be OK just to contrast and/or compare.
Not every other post, please.



798. Post 51132464 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

BTC did not "like" the GOT ending, or so it seems, lol.
All eyes on Tuesday.

I always "marveled" at Wallstreet's ability to plunge the asset a day or two before the good news and pump it before bad.
So many examples. I remember one in particular.
In 2003, rumors were spreading that AAPL is about to buy Disney and this depressed AAPL stock.
Large blocks were purchased by people in the know, apparently (check the volume), and a few days later AAPL announced iTunes and the stock went on a multi-year tear.



799. Post 51140789 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: PaivanTreidi on May 20, 2019, 03:47:40 PM
It is interesting that this ETF thing is so important. This side of the pond I could have invested in crypto ETFs for years now... Nothing new...
AFAIK, Crypto ETFs are baskets of shares of selected crypto companies. I think a cryptocurrency ETF exists already, but it includes ETH and other shitcoins. The ETFs under SEC scrutiny would include btc only. What's more, some of them are designed for settlement in kind, not in cash (that is, bitcoin - not USD). The importance or usefulness of such a financial instrument is debatable, but it can't be dismissed as "nothing new".

Where's the novelty? Everyone would be able to buy (paper) btc through their stock market broker, without having an account at an exchange. Besides, if the settlement is really in kind, the ETF issuer would have to hold/buy/sell matching amounts of the underlying asset (btc) or bear the risk when the ETF holder asks for payment. That is, if fuckery can be ruled out. Which is a big IF.

The swedes have an ETN that tracks Bitcoin only. They call it an etf. As I understand it it is an ETN though.

You can buy that ETN (called Bitcoin tracker or something similar) on Fidelity (even retirement accounts can buy).
I bought a little just to see how it works. It does track btc mostly OK. Big gaps because of weekends, of course.
Trades as CXBTF (in US).
https://xbtprovider.com/products/bitcoin-tracker-one



800. Post 51143178 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on May 20, 2019, 06:37:04 PM
so it's a 35 day period for comments and counter-comments to ask for clarity on basically how it all works -
surveillance, anti-manipulation, liquidity, Gemini, custody, the OTC part

fucking bullish

pump it

https://twitter.com/jchervinsky/status/1130547923211739138

Quote
As expected, the SEC has delayed the VanEck bitcoin ETF proposal. Read the order here: https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/cboebzx/2019/34-85896.pdf …. VanEck's new deadline is August 19. The SEC can & likely will delay one more time for a final deadline of October 18
... snip

They think that they look thoughtful, but in reality some prior comments were done by absolute nincompoops.
Whatevs...it's not even funny.
They pretend that GBTC does not exist. What is the difference?



801. Post 51144826 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on May 20, 2019, 09:39:14 PM
@JJG

Tbh buddy, I need to buy a diary (I like paper records) and write down a few price/sell scenarios. I need to be much better prepared for the next parabolic bull run.

The last one took me by surprise & I was a little bit like a deer in headlights.

We all need to have a fixed sell point for a % of our bitcoin’s in my opinion. I might go out tomorrow & buy a diary then scribble a few things down tomorrow night.

IMHO, all plans go astray when market hit you in the face as hard as the last time.
I promised to someone to sell a certain amount at 10K, then market surged and I sold only 1/10 of what was agreed.
Now, i am not certain whether i should still go ahead at 10-11K (if and when we get there) OR wait it out.
From prior btc bull markets, they always tend to go to new ATHs; on the other hand-what if this is the first time it wouldn't happen (as unlikely as it is)?

Another thought: I rather not plan selling at exact numbers, but maybe at a certain time vis-a-vis what I want to do with the proceeds.



802. Post 51160715 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on May 21, 2019, 11:34:52 PM


https://twitter.com/RedditBTC/status/1130887309795237889

So thats the Dumb money that still needs to come??

sad episode:

1. Some full bodied students (females) were ogling ONE dollar is if it is something, one even said that she is hungry. IDK, spent all money on tuition, perhaps? I was less broke during my student years, for sure.

2. Interviewer found a guy who wanted bitcoin, but he did not give it to him (at least to the first guy) under some lame excuse that the guy did not have a wallet.



803. Post 51162318 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: infofront on May 22, 2019, 03:46:31 AM
Shelby/Anonymint suggested I share this here:

https://steemit.com/trading/@anonymint/re-anonymint-re-anonymint-most-important-bitcoin-chart-ever-20190521t130454806z

It's his analysis on the Stocks-to-Flow model in relation to the future price of bitcoin. It's interesting stuff IMO.

Based on now almost forgotten BETI model, I always thought that prior bubble should have peaked at 28K or above.
It was really hoodwinked out of existence by the CME futures.
He is also surprised by that (the "bubble" peak was too low in 2017 by comparison) and suggests higher S/F next time (to "compensate").
That's an interesting idea, albeit I am not sure why S/F became such a rage all of a sudden?



804. Post 51172727 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: MrFreeRoMan on May 22, 2019, 06:06:09 PM
"Bitcoin is too volatile, it will never be money"

Bitcoin yearly volatility:

2011: 16%
2012: 11%
2013: 14%
2014: 13%
2015: 8%
2016: 5%
2017: 6%
2018: 7%

https://twitter.com/Rhythmtrader/status/1128657389677436928?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

So, he is saying that volatility is "steadily" increasing during the last three years?
Lol, it does feel this way, regardless.



805. Post 51173221 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Let's assume that in the year 2023 BTC is 250K without hyperinflation in fiat (as per Draper's numbers since he nailed the 10K time spot precisely).
Whatcha gonna do?

Retire?
Buy RE in trendy places (SF, NY, London)?
Buy a ranch (not for me), maybe a house in the woods?
Travel (or alternating between golfing, skiing and parasailing)?

Anybody care to say?

My choices (in the aforementioned scenario):
1. Retire (70-75% probability).
2. A small apartment, maybe NY or San Fran or even LA (got tired of all the heat in TX). Location is more important than size. Views are much better in San Fran, but the city loses it's culture mix, apparently.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/how-san-francisco-broke-americas-heart/2019/05/21/ef9a0ac0-70ea-11e9-9eb4-0828f5389013_story.html
3. A basic house in the woods-Oregon, maybe.
4. A few trips to Europe, maybe Japan. Will go to a few CL finals, hopefully!

Oh, forgot to say that I would not do anything if we keep oscillating between 5k and 20K.



806. Post 51173439 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: infofront on May 22, 2019, 07:14:28 PM
Let's assume that in the year 2023 BTC is 250K without hyperinflation in fiat (as per Draper's numbers since he nailed the 10K time spot precisely).
Whatcha gonna do?

Retire?
Buy RE in trendy places (SF, NY, London)?
Buy a ranch (not for me), maybe a house in the woods?
Travel (or alternating between golfing, skiing and parasailing)?

Anybody care to say?

My choices (in the aforementioned scenario):
1. Retire (70-75% probability).
2. A small apartment, maybe NY or San Fran or even LA (got tired of all the heat in TX). Location is more important than size. Views are much better in San Fran, but the city loses it's culture mix, apparently.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/how-san-francisco-broke-americas-heart/2019/05/21/ef9a0ac0-70ea-11e9-9eb4-0828f5389013_story.html
3. A basic house in the woods-Oregon, maybe.
4. A few trips to Europe, maybe Japan. Will go to a few CL finals, hopefully!

Oh, forgot to say that I would not do anything if we keep oscillating between 5k and 20K.

Retire, move to Texas or Florida, spend my time studying computer science, parenting, being a beach bum, and growing tropical fruit. When the kid has summers off from school, take long foreign trips.

I hear you, but are we moving (presumably) in opposite directions, lol?
In TX already. Like the people, and no state tax, don't like the heat and HIGH RE taxes (they are more than three times higher than in CA and seven times higher than in Hawaii).



807. Post 51177540 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: nutildah on May 23, 2019, 03:02:35 AM
I had my pizza with deep-fried avocado - delicious.

Deep fried avocado?? That sounds delicious. How do they fry it without it falling apart?

I guess if you can deep fry ice cream you can deep fry anything.

One of my favorite seasonal beverages is the avocado shake. You wouldn't think avocado would go well with vanilla ice cream, but it does. Its kind of amazing.

to me avocado feels like eating butter, but I know that it is good for me, so I partake regardless of the bland taste  Sad.



808. Post 51177721 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on May 23, 2019, 03:21:35 AM
to me avocado feels like eating butter, but I know that it is good for me, so I partake regardless of the bland taste  Sad.

 It is quite buttery but I usually don't find it bland.  Maybe if it's not quite ripe when you eat it?


I probably just ate too much several times when I was in more active avocado consuming period.
It's hard to get bad avocados in TX due to its proximity to Mexico Wink



809. Post 51178176 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on May 23, 2019, 03:53:45 AM
^Very cute Smiley





An Avocadro number?
The cute cat-a new meme, perhaps?



810. Post 51186743 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: soxxx on May 23, 2019, 06:25:33 PM
....these are the days that will form what you become.

err, no, too late for me, I am already fully grown  Grin

Quote from: infofront on May 23, 2019, 06:21:36 PM
The price is about $3k higher than it should be at this part of the cycle.   We are already higher than what the December 2019 peak should be. It’s all gravy.



Am I the only one kind of wishing their lives away until a point in the future, probably late 2021 or something?

No, I've got kind of a low key depression going on. I should be enjoying every moment of life, but I feel like I'm just going through the motions every day and just trying to "survive" until I can retire within 2-3 years, hopefully.

It makes me wish I was in a coma for three years. ATM, I'd probably be happier if I never heard of bitcoin. Weird situation  Huh  And I feel bad for feeling bad about this.

We need a fucking therapist in this thread.

This board is a good therapy, IMHO.
maybe you should charge subscription (by the hour)...JK



811. Post 51187510 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.47h):

Quote from: Paashaas on May 23, 2019, 07:10:55 PM
Relax and start planning to make your dreams come true. Financial freedom at the horizon is imo already a certain outcome.

Somehow, i have this nagging feeling that it might not happen.
Essentially, it would mean minting of millions of new millionares.
Too much deviation.
I actually tried to calculate what would be the price of btc be for total numbers of millionaires going up by less than 10% (from the current 33-36 mil millionaires).
I got about 0.86btc-1.28btc for $1 mil or 780K-1.16mil/btc (for total of about 2.75-3.5 mil accounts).
This is possible, but too much of a dream. How often dreams come to a realization?

I had the same vibe at 20K...feeling that it is somehow wrong. Maybe too early?



812. Post 51190810 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: gentlemand on May 24, 2019, 01:55:17 AM
Is there any impact on cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin if that "facebookcoin" will launch?
Like, it is possible the market cap of some cryptocurrency will decrease because of facebook?

Facebookcoin will be everything bitcoin is not. It'll be reversible, blockable, confiscatible, its value will be tied to the fiat currencies it's pegged to, and most importantly to many it won't make you any money.

Remittance is the one area I can see it eating cryptos theoretical lunch but then again they're partnering with Western Union which won't be a bargain.

I think Facebook will turn out to have bitten off more than they can chew. Compliance will be an utter nightmare.

If it's to have any effect it'll be to remind people how important the real deal is.

I fail to see the point of such facebookcoin. Why would someone need a monstrosity seemingly correlated with a basket of currencies?
That means that you can still lose value. A 'stable" currency that is not stable? If it is not stable, then you are still liable for the capital gains? Who needs it?
It's a lame attempt of outdoing Wechat, I suppose.



813. Post 51191457 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: Paashaas on May 24, 2019, 03:52:14 AM
Relax and start planning to make your dreams come true. Financial freedom at the horizon is imo already a certain outcome.

Somehow, i have this nagging feeling that it might not happen.
Essentially, it would mean minting of millions of new millionares.
Too much deviation.
I actually tried to calculate what would be the price of btc be for total numbers of millionaires going up by less than 10% (from the current 33-36 mil millionaires).
I got about 0.86btc-1.28btc for $1 mil or 780K-1.16mil/btc (for total of about 2.75-3.5 mil accounts).
This is possible, but too much of a dream. How often dreams come to a realization?

I had the same vibe at 20K...feeling that it is somehow wrong. Maybe too early?

You should hold that one full coin for atleast 5-10 years. I know it is a long time but you will reap the benefits big time.



Ah, it's a number that I got in a calculation (for a projected scenario), not a coin that I may or may not have.

TL;DR: too high a price of bitcoin (in the multiple millions) will result in a drastic increase in global millionaire numbers (if hodlers do not sell en masse), which is unlikely, therefore the price in the multiple millions is unlikely.
My calculated upper bound price of btc that does not affect the total number of millionaires too much is about $1mil/btc.



814. Post 51191608 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: cryptjh on May 24, 2019, 12:04:19 AM
Two kids accept bitcoins as a payment method in their small lemonade shop!
https://twitter.com/cryptomodel/status/1131300872170946560
image loading...



The btc addr of that QR code ....is not a segwit address... Roll Eyes
yet, new generation chooses btc!



815. Post 51198916 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on May 24, 2019, 06:03:40 AM
Ah, it's a number that I got in a calculation (for a projected scenario), not a coin that I may or may not have.

TL;DR: too high a price of bitcoin (in the multiple millions) will result in a drastic increase in global millionaire numbers (if hodlers do not sell en masse), which is unlikely, therefore the price in the multiple millions is unlikely.
My calculated upper bound price of btc that does not affect the total number of millionaires too much is about $1mil/btc.

I don't see multi-million BTC as implausible in 2030-2050 and certainly not beyond.


Perhaps, but I was only talking (effectively) about the next 5-10 years, which is a time period where i have the most interest.



816. Post 51199038 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: Neo_Coin on May 24, 2019, 08:00:10 AM

FB/WApp money by the end of the year:   Shocked Shocked

https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2019/05/24/facebook-and-whatsapp-break-cover-with-bitcoin-rival-plans/#5223f09b286e

Wow, hidden in the news is a fact that facebook has an access to a "time machine" /s

Quote
The bitcoin-inspired cryptocurrency, reportedly dubbed GlobalCoin, is set to be rolled out for testing by the end of 2018



817. Post 51199922 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: hodl_2015 on May 24, 2019, 05:06:53 PM
What market? Internet access?
Yup. In huge swathes of the world where it wasn't accessible before.
Improved bandwidth at good ping times for every home that is not yet connected directly to glass-fibre. Plus anything without a fixed location.
Similar to the Iridium network, but with many more satellites at much lower altitude, to provide more bandwidth and lower latency.
The first 60 v0.9 sats only relay via (local) ground stations, but Starlink is designed to have laser-based communication and routing directly between sats, so it doesn't really matter where the ground stations are and laser in vacuum travels faster than light in glass. Internet via geostationary satellites need to go 38000 km op and down (and always route via ground stations), Starlink just 400 km up/down.
The phase-array antenna chips and rest of the satellites is designed and build by SpaceX, and they use there own (re-used) rocket first stages and recovered payload fairings. Will be a while before competitors reach that level of vertical cost reductions.

Ground stations are a limitation. I would have preferred something that could be received by a small local antenna, like HD-TV. price needs to be lower as well.
I am tired of getting bamboozled by the local cable monopolist.



818. Post 51200302 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: Pamoldar on May 24, 2019, 05:35:16 PM

Just consider the bitcasino one. 0.02BTC times 52 weeks and that 1.04BTC a year.

Sometimes I feel this urge to wear the WO hat but then again I tell myself every satoshi counts for the future and when it's free then just take it. I also feel honored to wear this sig by the way. I mean look at the campaign we are only five here. It's a privilege too.

Funny thing, I see no campaign for you...so I don't see how it could possibly work (for the advertizer).



819. Post 51200355 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: Pamoldar on May 24, 2019, 05:45:28 PM


Funny thing, I see no campaign for you...so I don't see how it could possibly work (for the advertizer).
Notice the sig I am wearing and the avatar too. They are from Bitcasino 🙂

All I see is the letter B and then a text that is not very specific, sorry.
Ah, after you added the note, I understand.



820. Post 51200979 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: gentlemand on May 24, 2019, 06:23:24 PM
My campaign got stomped by the Feds and I can't find a new one. The camps get filled almost instantly and it always happen when I am not in front of a PC, and I am almost 7/24 in front of a pc.

If my campaign winds down I think that'll be my last one unless something unexpected pops up.

All that'll be left will be gambling pretty much and my only opinions on gambling are that it's evil and shit. I doubt that attitude would be much of an asset to them.

I looked a bit and some newer "campaigns" pay relative peanuts, yet demand a lot of activity.
The one's that don't accept new members look better.
Oh, well. It's just it is difficult (and not very profitable) to mine btc now.



821. Post 51201375 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

I guess, two points are clear (from the lively discussion):

1. Everyone wants more btc (and regrets prior decision to not acquire more).

2. It's difficult to get a good flow of btc now, be it from either mining or 'campaigning'. I don't even want to start with btc interest-that clearly won't work long term (blockfi, celsius, etc).

Conclusion: should have bought or 'earned' more, but the only realistic way now is through the ret. funds, if and when that spigot opens up.
I am thinking, maybe >5%, but = or < than 10% allocation in IRA and/or Roth.



822. Post 51201687 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: criptix on May 24, 2019, 07:29:24 PM
https://cointelegraph.com/news/facebook-in-talks-with-coinbase-winklevoss-gemini-to-launch-its-globalcoin-ft-report


One coin to rule them all.

Prepare for global adoption of digital money.

If around 10% of facebooks userbase gonna use facebook coin it will be bigger then paypal.

If 10% of them will jump into BTC we would probaly quadruple our userbase (assuming we have around 10 million btc users right now).

IMHO, facebookcoin is such horseshite, I don't know why anybody could be happy about it.
What, exactly, is the point of it?
I don't see them passing ANY regulation from the FED, though.
We should support J. Dorsey intended use of btc (twitter&square), instead.



823. Post 51202365 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: gentlemand on May 24, 2019, 08:46:20 PM
They are going to seek stability versus a basket of fiat currencies rather that USD dollars. I guess a basket of USD/EUR/JPY basket, maybe adding other relevant currencies as they expand towards new markets. Effectively it will be a new dollar index, they will be able to use traditional FX hedges to stabilise the value of the thing.

Makes sense. I wonder what many a government will feel when a weird little Vulcan suddenly wields a universe more power than they can possibly dream of.

I'd be shelving it and returning to practicing my blinking if I were him.

Yeah, remember what happened last time a large pseudo-monopolist claimed that that they will soon take the 'vig' from all transactions?
cough-Microsoft-cough

Not going to happenTM



824. Post 51202466 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: MrFreeRoMan on May 24, 2019, 08:56:00 PM

at the end of the day 1 came out profitable!) Total 1/6)
For me the most important thing is that I recognized my mistakes! It costs a lot


I remember reading a blog of one very prominent trader (sorry, I forgot the linky).
He said:

1. if your last 4-5 trades went bad, become very defensive.

2. if your last 4-5 trades were profitable, become very aggressive.

I lost a large chunk of my trading equity in 2001-2002 since I only knew the bull market of 1997-2001 prior to that.
Nothing worked, but I kept 'buying the dip'.
It was a good lesson.



825. Post 51202909 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: d_eddie on May 24, 2019, 09:33:58 PM

at the end of the day 1 came out profitable!) Total 1/6)
For me the most important thing is that I recognized my mistakes! It costs a lot


I remember reading a blog of one very prominent trader (sorry, I forgot the linky).
He said:

1. if your last 4-5 trades went bad, become very defensive.

2. if your last 4-5 trades were profitable, become very aggressive.

I lost a large chunk of my trading equity in 2001-2002 since I only knew the bull market of 1997-2001 prior to that.
Nothing worked, but I kept 'buying the dip'.
It was a good lesson.
And good value for money is my guess: eventually in the green anyway, unless you sodl or got rekt.

Are you referring to this blog by any chance?
http://theimpatienttrader.blogspot.com/2011/10/things-ive-learned-after-15-years-of.html

Someone posted a link to it just a few days ago. I think it was Last of the V8s.

yeah, that one, thanks and same to LotV8 (for posting it).



826. Post 51203084 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on May 24, 2019, 09:35:05 PM
Tinfoil time(not really though bc this all could very well be true):

What if this megapump of the last few weeks has been Facebook secretly buying up mostly Bitcoin but also a basket of other major cryptos to create a buzz in Crypto as they start leaking out their Globalcoin plans. Shocked

Also adding to this pump would have been insiders aware of Facebooks impending plans and buying Bitcoin to profit from such big news for Crypto in general.

Facebook might also realize its Globalcoin plans will be immensely good for the bitcoin price(hint: it is  Cool)


I beg to differ: it is not good for bitcoin at all. It would have been if they used btc, of course.
Now, instead of talking about Bitcoin story, all mass media would keep talking about is how facebook is "improving" bitcoin.
In reality: what exactly would support this stable coin for millions of people to use? I don't think that banks would be happy with this.
And governments? This would essentially mean facebook minting currency, which they obviously can't.
One interesting side effect: this would either kill XRP completely or banksters would run to it in lieu of facebookcoin.

Here (replace E-coin with facebookcoin):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ee-cHbCI0s



827. Post 51230570 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on May 26, 2019, 10:06:12 PM
I have problems keeping up with all these forks. I put my BTC on a paper wallet back in 2014. What forks do I get now for that? BCash, BGold. Do I also get BTC SV? Since I still have no BCash because I did not move my BTC since 2014.

First make sure that you transfer/sweep ALL of btc to a new wallet first.
Even experienced people sometimes forget about change, make a small tx, then proceed to lose the rest of it.
https://bitcoinpaperwallet.com/wallet-tutorial-add-withdraw-funds/

Some wallets (Exodus?) can help to recover multiple forks, although BCH+BSV is probably at least 90% of the rest sans btc proper.



828. Post 51240630 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on May 27, 2019, 11:50:44 AM
Because that wouldn't be science

Hairy, you’ve been right on most things so far in this cycle. I love your works Smiley

Right?  I love his work too, but charts are off due to the fact that we are off the 2014-2015 graph.
What now?

Most likely, we are already on the parabolic rise. The only question is when this local exponential rise ends (and it will end, obviously).
To see this, find BETI thread and maybe Peter Brandt's graph here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg50603641#msg50603641.
I also had some exponent here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg50479459#msg50479459 , but we did not have the "wiggle" , so it is happening even faster than I expected.
IMHO, AH is entirely possible even in 2019, albeit less likely still.



829. Post 51241572 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: vapourminer on May 27, 2019, 06:13:28 PM
eh well fuck I bought like 7 of those 333 megahash miners at 1 btc a pop.

heh yup, got one of those too. the block erupter. dont remember what i paid though.

if i had just held everything.. but meh. if no one had actually used btc it would be a failed experiment by now. and i didnt replace my early btc because it was all just majik internetz moneyz anyway..

My earliest memory is of S1. That was a funky (and super expensive!) little beast, never seen any electronics like this before, basically naked boards.



830. Post 51241635 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 27, 2019, 06:21:32 PM
eh well fuck I bought like 7 of those 333 megahash miners at 1 btc a pop.

heh yup, got one of those too. the block erupter. dont remember what i paid though.

if i had just held everything.. but meh. if no one had actually used btc it would be a failed experiment by now. and i didnt replace my early btc because it was all just majik internetz moneyz anyway..

Yes. There's no point in trying to think how things would have been if you did a single thing differently (ie hodling more or buying more) as if that wouldn't have influenced your own behaviour or even the whole echosystem. Maybe Bitcoin would have failed, or maybe you would have lost it some time later, or maybe....

Same as there is no point for laszlo thinking he shouldn't have bought the pizzas because: I am sure he had plenty of additional BTC, what did he do with them? Why didn't he mine or buy more after the trade? The price didn't suddently skyrocket right after the purchase.

Let the past be past. Think of the future... it's bright.

Yep, earlier in 2010-2013 period it probably was like being a super early VC round or angel investing.
2014-15 was more like a follow up VC round.
Now were are, hopefully, at btc IPO where public en large will start participating.
Re pizzas-great idea first time around, but later on the light bulb should have shined on (not sure if it ever did for that particular historical figure).
It did for Trace Mayer & other OGs, no doubt.



831. Post 51243290 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 27, 2019, 08:11:04 PM
Oh I just remembered today comes out the fourth episode of Chernobyl. Awesome mini-series!

Awesome as a show, horrible for what could have happened (mostly described in the second episode, but maybe more news in the fourth).
The history could have changed and all (apparently) depended on a few man acting in almost complete darkness walking in the chest high contaminated water.
Beats GOT, though, as the s-t is real.



832. Post 51246412 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Something that I did not know before: apparently, Laslo Hanyecz (the man who bought pizza for 10000 btc in 2010) is ALSO the man behind the first GPU-mining algorithm (in May 2010), which he released in the open (instead of mining with GPU for himself first). I wasn't around then, so I don't know how much each GPU was outperforming CPUs (maybe 10-fold), but with GPU, you can run them in parallel, so people run 6-8 GPUs on one CPU, greatly increasing computation. Man had mined at least 100K BTC.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/the-man-behind-bitcoin-pizza-day-is-more-than-a-meme-hes-a-mining-pioneer/



833. Post 51246723 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: GreatArkansas on May 28, 2019, 05:05:13 AM

efecini

Everyone should be entitled to their opinion, granted, and here is mine: he/she draws two lines with btc spending 90-95% of time in between, but, somehow, in projection, btc is mostly hanging out outside of the lines.
Why is that?



834. Post 51246763 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on May 28, 2019, 05:17:37 AM
so what will the next big FUD be? they seem to be out of ammo these days.

the next FUD is a state actor being rumored to throw support behind ... (some freakish alt).



835. Post 51255818 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: VB1001 on May 28, 2019, 03:42:16 PM


Quote
Bitcoin Mayer Multiple 1.911

https://twitter.com/ChartsBtc/status/1133385957875625984

BTCullish.



It probably means that we should slow down a bit, otherwise 20k (or 35K at most) is pretty much a limit (for now) at MM around 4.0 (8.0 at the historical max) .



836. Post 51256277 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: jbreher on May 28, 2019, 06:47:34 PM
do we have WO residents participating in whalepool telegram chat?

we can make a telegram group too.. you know.. to make the arrangements for the 100k party. My vote goes to make it in Cayman Islands.  Grin

I stand by my vote of Vegas (in summer). The place was basically built from scratch to host the $100K summit/party.

I’m up for that. Been three times a loved it every single time.
Never been but I think I need to start a W/O Twitte, get the BAT acceptance on it, have everyone donate their free BAT from brave convert it to BTC and put it in a publicly known address and use it as a beer/liquor fund for the party or we could divy it out back to the W/O members. (It wouldn't be much though fair warning.)

When 600watt was working on the $1K party, the admission was 1 BTC. This to cover venue, consumables, security, hostesses, travel from airport, etc. Essentially, an 'all-in' price.

I might suggest that the $100K party might be similarly funded. Though one full Bitcoin seems a rather steep price.

I can only imagine what kind of debauchery/indulgence could be organized in Vegas for 100k a nose during a 1-2 day party  Grin
"Hangover" is not even close.



837. Post 51256405 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: MrFreeRoMan on May 28, 2019, 06:57:41 PM


Where volumes?  Huh Huh Huh

check your own chart from April 2017 to October 2017 (no volume either yet price moved substantially), yet the correct answer in probably "The 3 day Memorial weekend in US"...



838. Post 51258147 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: jonoiv on May 28, 2019, 09:23:35 PM
Been looking at all the rocket/train/moon, posts/gifs back in 30th -31st May 2014.  

Differnt names same old posts.  Gonna be the same result IMHO.



you cannot expect the same in a different time...
as in "you cannot step into the same river twice".

OT: ETCG (ethereum classic publicly traded trust) elicited a bit of a snicker...quoted at $32.5 today with NAV at about 7.65 (calculated from todays ETC price). WTF? 325% price premium to NAV?
GBTC was never more than 75% or so and even that was crazy. 425% is beyond crazy.
Arb opportunity?



839. Post 51258227 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: MrFreeRoMan on May 28, 2019, 09:46:18 PM

I have a few sample choices for you sir Cheesy

https://i.imgur.com/sglf4ki.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/pexJm56.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/kZoNrzS.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/LXAvLbp.jpg


Eeny, meeny, miny, moe, who is the sweetest of them awww...



Aren't japanese getting the LEAST sex in OECD?
Something does not compute.



840. Post 51272115 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

The recent out-performance of various altcoins is what bothers me about the overall crypto market advance.
Typically, in a stock market, when 'pennies' (or highly speculative stocks) start shooting up 20% a day it means that the advance is close/closer to the end.
We shall see.



841. Post 51272440 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: infofront on May 29, 2019, 08:17:09 PM


Thanks for all your great and terrible poll ideas!

Crispy, but lemme think about it, lol
Did not vote  Grin.

wasn't Giroud an Arsenal guy before... what a reversal of fortune for Arsenal...
Arsenal win would have put five PL clubs into CL..definitely probably not going to happen now.
Hazard is on a rampage.



842. Post 51274165 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: fillippone on May 29, 2019, 10:56:49 PM
The only flipping I care about is Bitcoin vs Gold.

Gold: $7.5 trillion
Bitcoin: $155 billion

Once bitcoin overtakes gold, each bitcoin would be worth over $350,000.

We live in a digital age, the flip is inevitable.

https://twitter.com/Rhythmtrader/status/1133432395120742402

New poll when is this flipping going to happen!!!! Smiley
This is one of the best “back of the envelope calculations” ever done in the bitcoin valuation thesis.

It would be if it was the first time I saw that argument.
Alas, it is probably the hundredth  Roll Eyes.



843. Post 51274384 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on May 29, 2019, 11:33:19 PM
^
Tomorrow the Godzilla!!!!!!

Japanese would call it "GodziRRa" since they don't have an "L".
North mexicans, or in TX, probably "GodziJA" (as in quesadilla)
Cheers.



844. Post 51276195 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.48h):

Quote from: nutildah on May 30, 2019, 04:44:59 AM
clearly no one here has had a really good Hawaiian spam dish

I lived in Hawaii for over a decade and I can tell you with certainty there's no such thing. There are spam musubis, which are good if you're coming home after a night of drinking and make a quick stop at the 7-Eleven, and then there are dishes with spam in them.

A paradise, no doubt, and great for a visit (especially Maui, Kauai, etc.) but the sun is so harsh there...all oldtimers have basically leather skin.



845. Post 51302725 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.49h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on June 01, 2019, 01:25:25 AM
Yes it’s starting to feel like 2004 - 2006.  Record profits everywhere.  But that can run for a long time.

But what is the trigger?  It won’t be sub prime lending this time.  What is the legacy market financial WMD?

The answer is already clear from some charts.
Main example: DB
This alone makes the stock market recovery, especially financials, as fake as it can possibly be.
Combine DB chart with its known derivative exposure and the upcoming story is quite clear.



846. Post 51362336 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: mindrust on June 05, 2019, 04:25:51 PM
Meanwhile in Denmark:

My Bank In Denmark Just Offered Me A Negative Rate Of Interest To Borrow Money

The article says the negative interests were available for the banks and institutions... only till now. Now an average Joe go to the Danish bank, ask for money and get paid by doing so.

As somebody said in the comments, you can buy the whole country like that.

Crazy right? Interesting times. Sounds a lot like we are about to see the end of the financial system we knew.

Satoshi knew this shit was coming. When you think like that selling at $100k looks like a stupid idea.

I always wondered what NIRP actually means for regular folks.
This pretty much starts to provide an answer.

I also agree that it is not "normal". I cannot imagine how this continues and/or ends.
Interestingly, US 10 year note is rapidly decreasing in yield (massive buying).
Of course, for countries with NIRP, 2.26% interest for 10 year is a great deal, hence the buying (most likely from those countries).

Re the lively discussion on 100k party (ies): it's like a variation of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle...you cannot predict (measure) both the price (speed in HI) and timing (position in HI) of bitcoin. This explains why both 1K and 10k parties did not happen/failed.

A proposal on how to circumvent or "tame": It is likely that prior ATH will be breached and we would have a short correction afterwards, but should get on our way up within, say, 3 mo. Therefore the ATH party could be planned at 30-90 days post 20K, therefore nailing the time and, potentially, being still on a rise from ATH, which would make everyone happy.

TL;DR it is a ATH party, not strictly a 100K party. The time would be 30-90 days post new ATH (at a fixed time slot).



847. Post 51372894 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on June 06, 2019, 04:12:49 PM
^ @Gyrsur No problem. There are some awesome beverages that are particularly suited to be drank from a straw:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQknBk_xNtE

great! I'm in.

My name is Giovanni Gyrsur, but everybody calls me Gyrsur.

Shocked
from where you did get this? my first name is Walter and my second name is Giovanni because my mother is Italian. Damn! OpSec fail!



actually, if I get the reference, it was "Giovanni Giorgio, but everybody calls me Giorgio.":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhl-Cs1-sG4

Daft Punk!



848. Post 51374857 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on June 06, 2019, 06:32:04 PM
Whelp, just bought another $1,000 worth of corn below $7,500, so I guess that's nice  Huh

$1000 buys a btc "dole" of about 44 average earthlings.  
How much is enough? "More..."
Grin



849. Post 51375180 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Wow! Polo clipped 16% from every btc lending account because of a margin loss in some altcoin.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/bxkd6o/poloniex_btc_margin_lending_pool_losses/



850. Post 51377912 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: nutildah on June 07, 2019, 03:36:02 AM
Wow! Polo clipped 16% from every btc lending account because of a margin loss in some altcoin.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/bxkd6o/poloniex_btc_margin_lending_pool_losses/

That's plain nuts. I don't know how people could keep using Poloniex after that. Clams has always been a Grade B Shitcoin. Its biggest claim to fame is when John Oliver mocked it because of its name one time in a segment about cryptocurrencies.

Obviously they are betting they can get away with it legally-speaking, but I definitely wouldn't revisit them after this.

I guess using != lending.
Lenders going forward might not exist (on this platform).



851. Post 51378408 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: VB1001 on June 07, 2019, 05:20:58 AM
Stock to Flow Periodic Table

Quote
Bitcoin analyst, planB, is well known for his predictions based on the stock-to-flow (S2F) model. This is based on bitcoin (like gold) having an intrinsic value due to its scarcity of supply. The capped amount at 21 million, coupled with the regular halving of its emission, leads to an increasing scarcity of supply.

https://bitcoinist.com/bitcoin-stock-to-flow-targets-100-trillion-surpassing-gold/

...this Bitcoinist article makes a correct summary.


Ahem, this article is full of errors in arithmetic (graphs might be OK).
For example this:

Quote
$100 trillion is so much, that if you stashed away just one satoshi today, you would be a millionaire.

1sat is 1/100000000 of btc. If all btc is 100 tril, then 1 btc is about $5 mil (slighly less, of course).
$5mil/100mil satoshis (in btc)=5c/satoshi
5c is certainly MUCH less than a million (a.k.a you won't be a millionaire on one satoshi, lol).
He also says:

Quote
2 BTC would be the value of all of the currently existing paper money in the world.

with all btc being 100 tril, 2 btc would be $10 million.
Do we have $10 mil paper currency in the world?



852. Post 51386377 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on June 07, 2019, 06:33:58 PM
Didn’t you PM me once & say you’d bury your face in Subo’s snatch?

You're the only person on here who hasn't PMd me expressing that desire.

It's a funny old world.

Not really sure who my favourite celebrity female tbh, there’s too many.
...WHAT I do know is that recently I hate it when in movies they wanna push females more forward or give them real man movie-roles (just to get more female attention etc Roll Eyes


Agreed. Saw 'Captain Marvel' on the plane and ...what a dreck.
Bad story, bad acting, makes little sense overall.

It/she can destroy a gigantic ship by going through it and exploding it from within, making the story without meaning as all feelings and struggles are swept aside.

To summarize: If a superhero is not limited (like Superman-kryptonite), then all human connection is lost and a story makes no sense.



853. Post 51387150 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: Searing on June 07, 2019, 08:14:13 PM
India is against bitcoin AND against cash. Funny how that works.

Mmm A cashless, government controlled society, who wouldn't like that.... Roll Eyes

What Facebook coin is planning it seems.....see the link...$10,000,000 'decentralized' to run a NODE ...it is claimed...sh*t

https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2019/06/06/facebooks-radical-bitcoin-beating-cryptocurrency-plans-revealed/#40e3580a3564




this is going to be something that is stillborn.
Reasons:

1. it's a basket, so if you local currency is increasing vs "basket', you would actually lose money transacting in this.
2. Do you expect dozens of governments outsourcing their currency to facebook? LOL.
3. What would establish the value?
4. it is not a legal tender and would never be one.



854. Post 51399128 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Interesting take on the current monetary system (from a mostly EU/ London/Germany/Swiss perspective):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6m49vNjEGs

Basically, "nobody" knows what to do (apart from some small swiss effort).
Paradoxically, many expect even more deregulation in London finances after Brexit.



855. Post 51402300 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

waiting for bitcoin
to dominate everywhere:
a good way to age



856. Post 51409021 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on June 09, 2019, 04:29:42 PM

https://twitter.com/Dr_Yilmaz_PhD/status/1137457734138433536

Sweet sweet HOPIUM, always good on a small DIP Cheesy

hey, I am getting different numbers  Grin.
If lows were $180 and $3000, for argument's sake, then next projected (proportioned) low would be $50000.
If 50000 is a low after a 85% decline, then next peak is at $333333 instead of $175000.



857. Post 51410736 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

An interesting (and harsh!) critique of all ICOs.
https://medium.com/@jimmysong/why-icos-are-broken-3f918bd5b3fb



858. Post 51413139 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 10, 2019, 01:33:38 AM
Weekly close looks very ugly and points to a trend reversal.

We might revisit 6k range in the coming weeks/months.

We might and we might not, lol.

Im more on the bearish side right now.

65% going to 6k vs 35% going to 9k.

Im looking for a short entry here.


Could be.  Your odds seem in the ballpark of reasonable, even though I continue towards 50/50 thinking because I hate to make any bets in the way that I approach my BTC holdings (which I prefer to assure that I am adding to my reserves, rather than gambling that I may or may not add to my reserves).

Anyhow, I merely buy if the BTC price goes down and sell if the price goes up.  Seems safe, no?

In this case, I have already sold all the way up to $9k, so in recent times I have been put into buying mode, so my buy orders have been executing as the BTC price has been going down.  

Seems to work a lot better than trying to guess, and even if I were to have more confidence - such as something above 60%, which you seem to have, and even if you are guessing in a kind of reasonable way, to me, it seems as if you are betting too... because one thing is to close a long by selling a little bit of BTC, but another extra risk is to add leverage onto the situation by entering into a short position (which is what you said that you are doing)... too scary for me, and too much gambling for my risk tolerance temperament in terms of my preference to preserve what BTCs I have worked so hard to accumulate over the past 5.5 years.

That slow buying is easy, however slow selling is more problematic, especially since some coins you bought 5.5 years ago, although it depends on whether you use FIFO or LIFO accounting (the latter is simpler, but maybe less common). FIFO would guarantee at least long term cap gains status, which is much lower in US vs short term gains that are taxed by your tax bracket.

In addition, in a case of an old coin sell, properly splitting off at least 3, maybe 4 meaningful forks is also an annoying task.



859. Post 51424875 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

Quote from: criptix on June 11, 2019, 03:29:42 AM
https://www.forbes.com/sites/caitlinlong/2019/06/09/what-facebooks-cryptocurrency-means-6-predictions/#25a0842d7022

Point 6 and authors name nuff said Wink

I don't share the author's optimism that it would be good for bitcoin.
Neutral at best, in my opinion.
In addition, it could cause economic instability and will be most likely banned in a many countries, like China, India, Russia, etc.



860. Post 51431028 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

What is that DT1 that ya'll celebrating?
I honestly don't know.
Must be something important.
In this case, congrats.



861. Post 51436063 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.50h):

It can't stay above 8K (today and for a few weeks already).
Who knew that this number would become such a nuisance  Angry.



862. Post 51458161 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Reading WO lately...maybe something you can find from the link that we can adopt:
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/38-wonderful-words-with-no-english-equivalent

My favorites:

16. Lagom (Swedish)
Maybe Goldilocks was Swedish? This slippery little word is hard to define, but means something like, “Not too much, and not too little, but juuuuust right.”

37 & 38. Schlemiel and schlimazel (Yiddish)
Someone prone to bad luck. Yiddish distinguishes between the schlemiel and schlimazel, whose fates would probably be grouped under those of the klutz in other languages. The schlemiel is the traditional maladroit, who spills his coffee; the schlimazel is the one on whom it's spilled.

5. Backpfeifengesicht (German)
A face badly in need of a fist.

15. Fremdschδmen (German); Myφtδhδpeδ (Finnish)
The kinder, gentler cousins of Schadenfreude, both these words mean something akin to "vicarious embarrassment.”

19. Bakku-shan (Japanese)
Or there's this Japanese slang term, which describes the experience of seeing a woman who appears pretty from behind but not from the front.

28. Boketto (Japanese)
It’s nice to know that the Japanese think enough of the act of gazing vacantly into the distance without thinking to give it a name.

32. Hygge (Danish)
Denmark’s mantra, hygge is the pleasant, genial, and intimate feeling associated with sitting around a fire in the winter with close friends.
 



863. Post 51470649 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: FractalUniverse on June 14, 2019, 07:21:08 PM
Thinking we're due for a small pullback.

 If Gemini allowed for shorting, I would likely contemplate taking on a small short position at this point, with the funds that I'm fucking around with on there.
something is definitely changing on the market. most of the alts are going down against bitcoin today. looks like profit taking may have started there. the question is if it will push bitcoin higher yet, or hedging/profit taking takes place in btc too.
 but shorting seems to be too risky to me, at least for now

Apart from fundamentals (they should go down anyway), it's most likely Binance news.
Hey Bob, do you still want to sell some at 11K?

My current thinking is that the prior bull move (from prior ATH to current ATH) was $1160 to $19891.
Fib 61.8% retrace of the move would be about $12375 (50% would be $10525).
I believe that $10525 would be too early to rest because FOMO would kick in around there.



864. Post 51471516 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Thanks, Bob. Bullish  Grin

In other news: interesting discussion on facebookcoin vs bitcoin:
https://www.barrons.com/articles/what-facebooks-cryptocurrency-push-means-51560539185

I agree with the following:
Quote
“There’s just not any innovation in it,” says Gabor Gurbacs, director of digital asset strategy at VanEck/MVIS. “It’s just Silicon Valley’s ongoing attempt to take bank profits from the financial services industry to Silicon Valley.”

In addition:
Quote
A spokeswoman for the Senate Banking Committee, which sent Facebook a letter last month with questions about the service, said Facebook has not yet responded to its questions.

I don't see how anyone can tolerate a single company non-public pseudo cryptocurrency.
Apart from being introduced by an entity with 2.4 bil users, it is basically the worse of both worlds (crypto and fiat).

Taken at face value (pegged to a fiat basket), it can literally destabilize dozens of smaller local currencies because given a choice, NOBODY will conduct in them vs some combo of main currencies.



865. Post 51481045 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: jbreher on June 15, 2019, 07:22:54 PM
It's not easy taking a BIG ASS cut in your networth,

Truth you speak, young padowan - but with practice, easier it gets.

For once, I don't want to "...become an old man, filled with regret, waiting to die alone.”
We don't have to be like Jessie L., who probably has a record of gaining and losing large fortunes.
One time he even busted a trust fund, somehow.

I think that WO crowd would be a seller from 20-30k to whatever.
Those (plus OG) bitcoins would allow newcomers to gain exposure.
Just don't sell more than 70% total, EVER.



866. Post 51481403 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 15, 2019, 09:58:10 PM
It's not easy taking a BIG ASS cut in your networth,

Truth you speak, young padowan - but with practice, easier it gets.

For once, I don't want to "...become an old man, filled with regret, waiting to die alone.”
We don't have to be like Jessie L., who probably has a record of gaining and losing large fortunes.
One time he even busted a trust fund, somehow.

I think that WO crowd would be a seller from 20-30k to whatever.
Those (plus OG) bitcoins would allow newcomers to gain exposure.
Just don't sell more than 70% total, EVER.

I doubt that very many OG wall observers will be selling many coins in the $20k to $30k range, except perhaps to skim a few off for insurance.

Selling up to 70% seems a bit much, but I do believe some WO OGs are willing to sell that high of a percentage for a variety of individualized reasons which may or may not be well thought out, except thinking or hoping to buy back lower.. which may or may not play out.

Ahem, NOT for 20K to 30k, but rather from [20-30K] to Whatever (50,60,100, 150, 333, 400K).
I am also very confident that if we "pop" to, say, 25K, then start correcting downwards, many WOers would sell at least a portion.
They would not want to bear a possibility of a second trip downwards. It would be hard to resist.
A similar situation played out in 2017 when we went to 1300, then corrected to 870 or so.
Lots of selling.

Regarding apartments, etc....what's the point (apart from endowing your descendants) of keeping btc and not spending it?
Apartments in NY or San Fran (with a view) sounds good; something small in a nice wooded area (Oregon or British Columbia) and/or tropics is also interesting.
I am for spending [a portion] at the right time. New generations have to (mostly) work their way up, not getting trust funds from their daddyo's.



867. Post 51481460 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: jojo69 on June 15, 2019, 10:10:41 PM
.. which may or may not play out.

exactly

say I had managed to time the top and got out at 17.5 last time, which would have been a pretty good trick to hit that 5 day window, sure as shit it would have run to 45 and this dip would have bottomed at 18.

That's why selling at the right time is so hard (last time it could have easily been either 15K or 30K).



868. Post 51481700 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 15, 2019, 10:30:45 PM
It's not easy taking a BIG ASS cut in your networth,

Truth you speak, young padowan - but with practice, easier it gets.

For once, I don't want to "...become an old man, filled with regret, waiting to die alone.”
We don't have to be like Jessie L., who probably has a record of gaining and losing large fortunes.
One time he even busted a trust fund, somehow.

I think that WO crowd would be a seller from 20-30k to whatever.
Those (plus OG) bitcoins would allow newcomers to gain exposure.
Just don't sell more than 70% total, EVER.

I doubt that very many OG wall observers will be selling many coins in the $20k to $30k range, except perhaps to skim a few off for insurance.

Selling up to 70% seems a bit much, but I do believe some WO OGs are willing to sell that high of a percentage for a variety of individualized reasons which may or may not be well thought out, except thinking or hoping to buy back lower.. which may or may not play out.

Ahem, NOT for 20K to 30k, but rather from [20-30K] to Whatever (50,60,100, 150, 333, 400K).
I am also very confident that if we "pop" to, say, 25K, then start correcting downwards, many WOers would sell at least a portion.
They would not want to bear a possibility of a second trip downwards. It would be hard to resist.
A similar situation played out in 2017 when we went to 1300, then corrected to 870 or so.
Lots of selling.

It may not matter too much, but I think that we have differing ways of spinning this whole matter in order to arrive at our conclusion.

Personally, I recall that there was a whole hell of a lot of hype about how many folks would be selling in the $900 to $1,500 price arena, but in the end, we largely went through that price arena like a hot knife going though butter, in spite of the mucho hype about the selling that would take place.   Sure, in January 2017 we passed above $1k and in March 2017, we revisited sub $1k like you said, but in my thinking there continued to be way more hype about down than was able to be such sustained...l which is likely going to be similar this time around too... which is a lot of dumbies and weak hands are going to be shook out of their coins in that price arena... but the vast majority of the more experienced HODLers are not likely to sell many, if any, coins around that area.. and won't be shook from their coins, inspite of the then anticipated hype... and I doubt that there is going to be fear about revisiting low prices - like the nonsense that Vinny lingham was spouting out in March 2017... which did not play out, even though some gullible folks listened to him and sold their coins.

I probably agree with 90% of the above. Vinny did cause much selling, didn't he? Well, nobody knew back then if he was spouting nonsense or really had an insight. Only later we knew that it was the former.
Personally, my dream scenario would be a situation where btc literally follows the S/F graph. Sharp up, then quasi-stable for years. It's the best for slowly "skimming". Last time it was just too fast on both slopes.



869. Post 51483173 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

I am sorry to bring it up, aren't we below 9k again?
We'll see tomorrow.



870. Post 51491265 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on June 16, 2019, 07:33:23 AM
9.3k and we are still 1 year and 3 months away from the bullrun  Cool

My only minor concern if we go up too much, too fast is a massive dump. I’d like the usual cycle to play out as it is supposed to, slowly climbing before a parabolic rise.

Aimed at HM - Is the fractal still likely to be followed even if we go up rapidly now, as in are we likely to hit 6 figures in 2021 even if we go up rapidly now/early?

It’s just a guide.  And the guide is telling us right now we are high, hot and fast.   But the numbers are not unreasonable - we are still below our target price for the halvening.  So no, I don’t think the fractal has been broken at a macro level.  

It is reasonable to expect some pullback in July and August.  But I sure as hell would not short this market or try to sell local tops.




Well, right now I am of the opposite opinion. Simply put, this cycle will play out differently, but let's wait for July/August.
There is no law that says that we cannot peak earlier since mass participation could overwhelm the current absence of halving effects.
Some people keep talking about long bear cycles as well (that might follow the halving of 2020 or 2024).
My last buy (apart from regular smaller monthly DCAs) was at $4200. Leverage is not for me due to prior experience with margin in stocks.
One prediction, though: if stock markets will go down hard (which I don't expect yet), bitcoin will not be able to resist the trend, halving or not.



871. Post 51493262 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: hodl_2015 on June 16, 2019, 09:31:21 PM
Tesla is actually working towards 1M miles lifetime on drive-train and battery. They also provided battery upgraded for the original Tesla roadster, long after it ended production. They are not there yet but at least they are trying to build long lasting cars instead of frequently selling replacement cars.

Model S is about $20-25K overpriced over BMW Model 5. Maybe too much of a premium.
Model 3 is too small, feels like a Civic inside.
I almost bought one (Model 3), but thinking about something else now.
I guess I didn't because of all this nonsense about a car without a wheel, car that goes off to earn (like a hooker) and other verbiage from Musk.
It really turned me away for now.

Vegeta is back? I missed it for a couple of hours.

Quote from: ChinkyEyes on June 16, 2019, 09:53:49 PM
I think we all can agree that the dollar can't continue any further. But BTC taking over, right now I would say is a 50% chance. Since I doubt they will leave it to the people. It's why Globalcoin and JP Morgan coin are in place.

There are weaker OECD currencies out there than the $.



872. Post 51493595 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

facebookcoin and/or jpmcoin= E-coin (from Mr Robot), or will try to become one.
Modi is trying to ban btc? LOL.
He would be surprised (or not ) by what facebookcoin (if successful) might do to the rupee (BTW it is already roughly half of it's value in 2007).
Same goes for at least a few other large fiat currencies (australia, south africa, canada, mexico, korea, turkey, etc.).



873. Post 51514701 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

re that facebookcoin thingie...
basing on what i read...did not read the white paper yet...

They said that it is 'backed' by currencies and/or gov bonds, but the question is to what proportion.
If it anything less than 1:1, then they are acting like a bank without being officially a bank (no bank license).
French already raised a question about it.
The question of sovereignty also came up.



874. Post 51515260 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: bitserve on June 18, 2019, 05:52:53 PM
re that facebookcoin thingie...
basing on what i read...did not read the white paper yet...

They said that it is 'backed' by currencies and/or gov bonds, but the question is to what proportion.
If it anything less than 1:1, then they are acting like a bank without being officially a bank (no bank license).
French already raised a question about it.
The question of sovereignty also came up.


There are much more questions about that point:

- They say it is a (somewhat?) stable coin, but as soon as they are backing it with a basket of different assets/currencies the price MUST fluctuate.

- If the value of the underlaying assets fluctuate does the price gets set by them according to that estimated recalculated value? If so, every second? minute? hour? day?... yearly?

- If they don't set the price then exchanges should exist for that. Once the coin is tradable no matter what the real value of the underlaying assets is the price could fluctuate heavily in relation to its real value (pumps and dumps).

In conclusion, the pricing thing alone will be a complete nightmare and shitshow.

Other day we could talk about security... as in.... even if it is backed by real assets in custody... what happens if, for example, facebook gets a massive hack in which millions of users get their wallets emptied? What if they mess up with the emission in relation to the backing assets?

Bitcoin has a clear distance from that sort of incidents (even if they impact it in some way each time a big hack happens) but in this case? The shit will be all over the place.

The more I think about it, it would have been safer for them to just implement a multi-crypto wallet into their network and distance from the coin/s used instead.

We will see.



yes, good points.
i also mentioned local currencies instability here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg51493595#msg51493595

Basically, libra (which would be based only on usd, eur, pounds and yen) would decimate local currencies. If used broadly, why would anyone use local? Binance research suggests something similar, but in a wrong direction.



875. Post 51516048 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: bitserve on June 18, 2019, 07:59:37 PM
Mic

Saw this and thought of you



I need to ask. Why the two satellite antennas oriented towards ground?

..the signal bounces off the parked cars? repeater station in the subway?
or...this is an alternative universe..look, they even parked on the "wrong" street side, lol



876. Post 51518490 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: podyx on June 18, 2019, 11:24:24 PM
Year 2017 had a similar weekly candle set-up as the one today, which was followed by a 570% price increase over the next 147 days. Another similar price increase puts BTC price at ≈$62K by the end of October 2019.


https://twitter.com/galaxyBTC/status/1140576413180997632

This graph looks reasonable.

Going up to $60k then drops to $20-$40k ish.

Halving kicks in.

Bitcoin blast to $100k - $200k.

This is what I imagine aswell.

I've been running a few analysis methods to predict a top (that I also used in predicting previous bubble tops pretty damn accurately) and it came out at $55k-$60k if it were to happen this summer/fall

Could you link a couple (or more) of your prior predictions of such tops.
I am genuinely interested. Thanks.

BTW, a move exactly like in 2013 would be $3.1 K to 65K, down to $16.7K, up again to $300K.
Of course, it is never the same, but it could rhyme.



877. Post 51519061 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on June 19, 2019, 04:43:17 AM
Basically, libra (which would be based only on usd, eur, pounds and yen) would decimate local currencies. If used broadly, why would anyone use local? Binance research suggests something similar, but in a wrong direction.

If you earn USD, why would you want to take (partial) FX risk on yen, pounds and euros?

True, that goes without saying re the dollar.
What I am talking about is the following: if, theoretically, libra becomes popular for exchange in countries outside of the big four currencies represented in the 'basket', I can foresee citizens of those countries abandoning their local currencies.
Why would they still transact in rupee/lira/peso/rand when essentially a basket of stronger currencies is available? Obviously, this trend will not happen in places where local currency appreciated in the last 10 years.



878. Post 51519168 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on June 19, 2019, 05:02:49 AM
Basically, libra (which would be based only on usd, eur, pounds and yen) would decimate local currencies. If used broadly, why would anyone use local? Binance research suggests something similar, but in a wrong direction.

If you earn USD, why would you want to take (partial) FX risk on yen, pounds and euros?

True, that goes without saying re the dollar.
What I am talking about is the following: if, theoretically, libra becomes popular for exchange in countries outside of the big four currencies represented in the 'basket', I can foresee citizens of those countries abandoning their local currencies.
Why would they still transact in rupee/lira/peso/rand when essentially a basket of stronger currencies is available?

USD is the global reserve currency.  Making it a basket of currencies is very international but unnecessarily complicated things, in a way that a Venezuelan with a grade 3 education will struggle to understand.

Facebook dun goofed.  It should be a USD stable coin only.

it would make no sense to fb to limit only to $$.
here is a reason:
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-06-18/facebook-will-make-the-money-now

Quote
For another thing, if Libra gains widespread acceptance, its lack of one-to-one correspondence will give it a tendency to displace national currencies. If you mostly spend dollars, and Libra is always going up and down against the dollar, that will be annoying and you won’t want as many Libras. But if you mostly spend Libras—if Facebook is successful at making this the main currency of the internet—then that dynamic will reverse. If the dollar is always going up and down against the Libra, that will be annoying and you’ll want more Libras. The dollar will start to seem unstable and useless. If you buy most things online, and if everything online is priced in Libras, then you’ll end up living your life denominated in Libras, and only converting your Libras into dollars on your occasional touristic visits to the physical world. 4 The goal is for Libra to be more useful than any national currency, accepted in more places and with fewer complications; pegging it to a single national currency would only hold it back.

However, if zuck would try to displace the dollar...well, let's just say that it won't happen.



879. Post 51525984 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.51h):

Quote from: VB1001 on June 19, 2019, 03:13:47 PM

https://twitter.com/PeterLBrandt/status/1141321066910035969

PB on fire. Wink

We should have gone to 60-80K last time.
Futures killed the run prematurely.
Maybe, to 'compensate', we will go 600-800X this time instead of even lower multiple (32X).
I know, it would be crazy numbers. Keeping the same multiple as the last time (119X ) results in $375K, a number that comes up frequently in other estimates.
PB simply cannot say that it would be 375K as it would be too optimistic.



880. Post 51538558 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

My final take on btc vs libra:

Short term it is bullish for btc, medium term bearish, very long term bullish (in the end).
At first I felt terrible about it, but now much better since, most likely, in the end we would win, even if it takes a long time.

A small prediction: btc might still go up for some time before libra launch, then will either stabilize or enter bearish state, without relation to halving (halving disconnect), then, in a very long run (a decade?) btc would start sucking in funds from libra.

One thing of note: our peaks and valleys will become much smoother.
This is already happening: compare the daily and weekly fluctuation in 2015-2017 run with the current run. many short term updowns of 20-30-40% in 2015-2017, much smoother 2019 run (apart from a simple episode of a plunge to 6100)



881. Post 51538968 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: mindrust on June 20, 2019, 05:11:32 PM


Saw this on reddit but as you know it is originally from 4chan.

Next year today all of us will be rich (xcept r0ach) and some of us are going to upgrade from already rich to rich as fuck rich. (and those who already rich af will be...)

I'll try and wait for November/2020.  Grin

the Date for 100k party is pretty clear to me now. Sometime in 2021.

He predicted two time points incredibly well, kudos to him.
We'll see how the rest will fare.

However, his prediction also indicates an incredible 1760 bil market cap for alts late next year (current value 122bil).
I just don't see it happening (it would mean $3700 for eth and/or $6 for XRP).



882. Post 51540615 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

It's hard to make sense of everything:
bond yields decline=lower inflation expectation
gold, oil rally=higher inflation expectation
stocks rally on presumable lower future rates, but if oil spikes, we won't get those.
EU is going crazy with NIRP. Imagine the losses if rates suddenly start gong up.

The only way to win is not to play (in most of those markets).
We'll see how much btc would extend this rally.



883. Post 51541095 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Wekkel on June 20, 2019, 09:14:13 PM

Smash & grab. Everybody thinks it's the last chance to get in below 10k because after that price goes up in increments of 10k.


I feel it coming.

All 2017 retail buyers are already gearing up for this one. Gonna be Epic.

They most certainly not, I did not get a single call, text about it from any mid-late 2017 buyers so far.
I don't feel much of a FOMO yet.



884. Post 51543999 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: rhomelmabini on June 21, 2019, 05:28:45 AM
Every day a little higher, good morning WO,s

We will probably touch 10000, sit in your hands and HODL !!!!!


<snip>

HODLSLEEP!!

er, that word is trademarked by mic already  Wink, unless you are a s-p.



885. Post 51551507 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

FOMO is here, or rather an 'orgy' of dummies: Silbert's eth stock tracker commenced trading at 1343% of NAV.
This must be a record. In other words: someone is paying 13.43X the underlying crypto.
Insanity...and kills my hopes for the bitcoin ETF. I am not paying anything above NAV.



886. Post 51552937 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: soxxx on June 21, 2019, 07:57:27 PM
Just by the eye test, this bull market looks more like the 2012 one, than the 2016 one. Who would have thought?

You probably mean 2013 rather than 2012, but who is counting  Grin



887. Post 51553716 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: vapourminer on June 21, 2019, 07:17:11 PM
just came across an old receipt.. sold 3 btc for 25 bucks back in 2012.

dont even remember what i used the 25 bucks for. i hope it was nice.

let me guess..two pizzas?
I've got trezor for what is now about $1500, an expensive little brat.
Who knew?



888. Post 51556222 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: asu on June 22, 2019, 04:26:42 AM
A brief history of Bitcoin in 2017:

$8,000 - $10,000: 11 days
$10,000 - $12,000: 7 days
$12,000 - $14,000: 1 day
$14,000 - $16,000: 1 day
$16,000 - $18,000: 8 days

https://twitter.com/rhythmtrader/status/1141388608894640128

$10k-$20k took only 17days


By comparison, in 2019

$8000 - $10000: 38 days (I like the fact that we are going fast, but so far slower than in 2017)
$10000 -$12000: ?



889. Post 51575618 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

my 2c about bitcoin and [helping] children.

IMHO, parents should help children achieve what they want to achieve and that's it.
Practically: get them into the best pre-school and school that you can manage/afford, guide their learning and sports activities (in balance), never deny them what they ask as far as education goes (museums, trips, etc.).
I also think that parents should pay as close to 100% of educational expenses (including college) as possible.

After this, the only way I see myself helping is a house downpayment (in expensive cities).
They have to be able to be independent, not rely on trust funds, even if your btc winnings would allow for this in a few years.
Later on, they will get their inheritance, but, hopefully, they would be ready for it then.



890. Post 51575867 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: jbreher on June 23, 2019, 05:46:46 PM
there will likely be more spending friendly regulations ... in a few years....

Huh

yeah, 'friendly regulations" like..."Papers!".



891. Post 51576614 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Globb0 on June 23, 2019, 07:07:17 PM
Let's just say hypothetically that a WO guy or gal (the one in here) were to be inclined to purchase a brand new Lambo with 1BTC, once Lambos were within that price range - or bitcoins were within that level of price appreciation.

How many BTC would you say would be prudent to be in that person's BTC holdings or the level of that person's wealth, more or less, to make it prudent to use one BTC on a lambo?   Perhaps the equivalency of at least 10 BTC?   If you have the wealth equivalency of 10BTC when a Lambo is worth 1 BTC, then you can prudently afford a lambo, in my level of thinking about prudence.  

Of course, other guys and gal might come to a different conclusion than me, and be willing to allocate their value towards a lambo with much less of a value cushion.  Personally, I think it would be somewhat reckless to have less than 5 BTC of value and to apportion 1 BTC towards a lambo.. but, hey that's me.

It’s too much money unless we end up with a situation where 1BTC or 2BTC = a Lambo then you can probably leave me out.
I can afford to buy a couple right now & have a good stash still left but fuck that.

I’m not spending a sizeable amount of my stash on a fucking car, man.

Big, massive house & multiple apartments to rent out - yes.
Car - No

Never spend huge amounts of corn on anything unless it’s something that increases in fiat value. New cars are one of the worst investments.


Yeah, but get real LFC.

I understand that you are still in a kind of scarcity mindset, but once you reach filthy rich status, then at that point you have so much excess wealth that you will likely become less frugal than your current mind-set will allow.  I already can see from your posts that you do not have a warren buffet mindset.  You are not going to be eating at McDonalds and driving 15 year old cars once you reach filth rich status.

Furthermore, I appreciate that your threshold for spending money on a lambo is decently high, and probably in a similar arena as mine, even though I do kind of like cars.. not as much as hookers, but still... I can appreciate a nice car.

so yeah, perhaps there are some WO peeps who might go so low as 1/5 ratio and willing to spend their BTC on a lambo, and I am more likely in the 1/300 ratio.. but you might be in the 1/1000 ratio...   Part of my point, is that there would be a threshold in which extravagance is part of the mix... including flashy cars, such as a lambo.  Yeah the hookers and blow might have a lower threshold, but those ones were not really part of my hypothetical question.

A tax event might propel the idea of an investment in a vehicle.

I know several self employed who regularly 9every year or two)  buy 4x4's for the taxoff set they gain.

You mean Section 172 (in US)?
It only works if you can justify a vehicle (have to travel to clients, etc).
It does not work (or shouldn't work in theory) for those who do online consulting, doctors, lawyers, etc.
Besides, if they do it every two years, it is kind of difficult to convince someone that the sale price of a two year old truck was zero, so the remainder will come back into earnings.



892. Post 51576682 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on June 23, 2019, 07:16:03 PM
What we have here is a failure to go down.

maybe we can get another fiddy soonish  Grin



893. Post 51576756 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Globb0 on June 23, 2019, 07:18:09 PM

UK mostly self employed builders


Ah, OK.
Is UK building a lot these days?
FOF lives in a 18th century house. Apparently, it is a "thing" in London's suburbs.
I like modern housing more  Wink .



894. Post 51577013 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 23, 2019, 04:01:46 PM

It’s too much money unless we end up with a situation where 1BTC or 2BTC = a Lambo then you can probably leave me out.
I can afford to buy a couple right now & have a good stash still left but fuck that.

I’m not spending a sizeable amount of my stash on a fucking car, man.

Big, massive house & multiple apartments to rent out - yes.
Car - No

Never spend huge amounts of corn on anything unless it’s something that increases in fiat value. New cars are one of the worst investments.


Yeah, but get real LFC.

I understand that you are still in a kind of scarcity mindset, but once you reach filthy rich status, then at that point you have so much excess wealth that you will likely become less frugal than your current mind-set will allow.  I already can see from your posts that you do not have a warren buffet mindset.  You are not going to be eating at McDonalds and driving 15 year old cars once you reach filth rich status.

Furthermore, I appreciate that your threshold for spending money on a lambo is decently high, and probably in a similar arena as mine, even though I do kind of like cars.. not as much as hookers, but still... I can appreciate a nice car.

so yeah, perhaps there are some WO peeps who might go so low as 1/5 ratio and willing to spend their BTC on a lambo, and I am more likely in the 1/300 ratio.. but you might be in the 1/1000 ratio...   Part of my point, is that there would be a threshold in which extravagance is part of the mix... including flashy cars, such as a lambo.  Yeah the hookers and blow might have a lower threshold, but those ones were not really part of my hypothetical question.

Interesting points from both.
Some people actually like being frugal, aka driving much less of a car than they can afford. WB is an example, of course. Maybe they get off on power, etc.
Sometimes it also could be a work place. If you suddenly show up with a Lambo or McLaren GT in a middle income workplace, there might be too many questions.
On the other hand, what's the point if you can't spend a bit.

The progression is (or should be): middle class>affluent>rich>wealthy
The difference  between rich and wealthy is the duration.



895. Post 51577151 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 23, 2019, 07:59:53 PM
Interesting points from both.
Some people actually like being frugal, aka driving much less of a car than they can afford. WB is of course an example. Maybe they get off on power, etc.
Sometimes it also could be a work place. If you suddenly show up with a Lambo or McLaren GT in a middle income workplace, there might be too many questions.
On the other hand, what's the point if you can't spend a bit.

The rich stay rich by acting poor. The poor stay poor by acting rich.

The blingiest people I've come across never had a pot to piss in. I have an in law who's the richest person I know. He makes a couple of million quid a year. The last time he stayed at a fancy hotel the staff asked him to hide his 2003 Skoda out the back.

Well said.
He did stay in the fancy hotel, so THAT is his weak spot, lol.
Everyone probably has at least one.



896. Post 51577202 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Icygreen on June 23, 2019, 08:00:39 PM
my 2c about bitcoin and [helping] children.

IMHO, parents should help children achieve what they want to achieve and that's it.
Practically: get them into the best pre-school and school that you can manage/afford, guide their learning and sports activities (in balance), never deny them what they ask as far as education goes (museums, trips, etc.).
I also think that parents should pay as close to 100% of educational expenses (including college) as possible.

After this, the only way I see myself helping is a house downpayment (in expensive cities).
They have to be able to be independent, not rely on trust funds, even if your btc winnings would allow for this in a few years.
Later on, they will get their inheritance, but, hopefully, they would be ready for it then.

I agree and I also believe teaching them to save with their own earnings (regardless of any debts owing) is crucial at a young age.  I started a savings account with my son in BTC when he turned 19 with the understanding that it will be a deposit only account until he's 40 or decided to buy a home.  A very small amount goes in each month.  My hope is that it'll represent/reinforce the notion of personal financial security while the value increases until a time where it actually does offer such security.  

Good one. I told my son that I would either open a Roth IRA for him (at 19) and deposit his first year earnings there OR btc...the brat chose btc.
Oh, well, it can't be helped. So far, maybe 60% ROI, we shall see.



897. Post 51577293 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Searing on June 23, 2019, 08:15:14 PM
Back to 11 000! This week will be very interesting! Wink


Ah, Bitcoin is like the very HOT bi-polar Girlfriend. When it is bad, it is very, very bad.

But when it is good, she is very, very bad...(er, distracted myself) ..I mean all is great!


aka "Shameless"...
Cheers, B.



898. Post 51577565 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: jbreher on June 23, 2019, 08:51:25 PM

Don't forget: the drones are coming.

You have been warned.

huh? amazon drones?



899. Post 51578722 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on June 23, 2019, 11:19:31 PM
Good afternoon all

Hope everyone got out and blew the stink off yourselves. I sure did, the upper Methow is stunning right now even if still wet and cold.


Lucky dog (re location). It's hard to do when it is 93F around here.
Maybe will visit WA or OR toward the end of the summer, though.
Never been there, it looks very nice.
https://www.vrbo.com/722563



900. Post 51585537 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: VB1001 on June 24, 2019, 02:25:48 PM

https://twitter.com/TraceMayer/status/1143059448786636800

Key Bitcoin Price Indicator Suggests $21,000 ‘Fair Value’ By End Of 2019

Quote
The bitcoin (BTC) price is unlikely to break $40,000 in 2019, Bitcoin Knowledge podcast host Trace Mayer declared as part of new analysis on June 24.

Uploading fresh readings from his price forecasting tool, the ‘Mayer Multiple,’ the serial commentator and bitcoin proponent said that current trajectory should favor an end-of-year bitcoin price of $21,000.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/key-bitcoin-price-indicator-suggests-21-000-fair-value-by-end-of-2019

it's possible that he sold some calls...I distinctly remember him selling some puts before (not sure if it worked out or not).



901. Post 51586270 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

2017 version of my better half: "Why you did not sell [some number] at 10K, you promised, you promised."
2019 version of the dialogue: "Should I, hon?" "Oh, no, keep it, don't you dare."
Got myself a "keeper"  Grin .

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 24, 2019, 03:49:28 PM

it's possible that he sold some calls...I distinctly remember him selling some puts before (not sure if it worked out or not).

You referring to Trace Mayer, Biodom?  

Are you suggesting that he is talking his book?  or his analysis is off in some kind of way?  

Personally, I would suggest that Trace Mayer's analysis is off because it seems to suggest a kind of gradualism in the coming months and even years.  I know that he is showing how fair value progresses, but bitcoin does not tend to progress in any kind of short-term gradualism.

Perhaps, the former, but maybe also the latter as you discussed.



902. Post 51586997 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Phil_S on June 24, 2019, 04:37:23 PM
OK, made by own "2017 vs 2019" overlay:



About 80K 2019 local top...I can live with that  Cheesy
I am already seriously jealous of some countries (Germany), citizens of which do not pay any capital gains if they held corn for more than a year.



903. Post 51587793 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Febo on June 24, 2019, 06:00:55 PM
OK, made by own "2017 vs 2019" overlay:




It is totally possible. I started speculate that we will have two bull runs in this cycle same as it was in 2013. April and November runs.   So we reach ATH of this run at end of this or beginning of next year and then crash. I doubt there will be a 80% crash. And a year latter we have the final bull run of this 2020 halving Bitcoin cycle.

I am of the same persuasion (two peaks as in 2013): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg51518490#msg51518490
The gist of it: up to 65K (in 2019, early 2020), down to $16.7K (before halving), up again to $300K.
Perhaps, this would emerge as WO "prediction" consensus.



904. Post 51588609 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Searing on June 24, 2019, 07:31:44 PM

...a few reasons to just keep your stuff in cold storage (safety deposit box in my case) along with the segit info above.


Safety deposit box in a bank?
A historical reference:

FDR EO 6102
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-6102-requiring-gold-coin-gold-bullion-and-gold-certificates-be-delivered




905. Post 51589043 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.52h):

Quote from: Searing on June 24, 2019, 08:13:25 PM

...a few reasons to just keep your stuff in cold storage (safety deposit box in my case) along with the segit info above.


Safety deposit box in a bank?
A historical reference:

FDR EO 6102
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102


https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-6102-requiring-gold-coin-gold-bullion-and-gold-certificates-be-delivered



Well, I figure by the time society/Gov't is after me and it is that far gone, it won't matter. I also figured that IF a meteorite takes out my bank, well the crypto gods hate me!

I 'suppose' I should make a copy to another bank in another state, in case of the 'Zombie Apocalypse'

What you state above, does not really matter in my case, in that when BTC was evil in 2013 my bank manager informed the SEC I was an 'evil crypto trader' in that in 2013

all BTC was for drugs/hookers/etc. Thus at least for 2 weeks going into the bank before the SEC guy phoned and had a meeting about this. I was a 'true' desperado with

all the side looks and side talk when I went to the bank to do my business. I cleared it all up with my mining CPA signed Tax Return of 2014, made the bank manager look

like an Idiot. Thus have been 'legal as hell' from that point on.

So I'm afraid the powers that be already have my number, in that I had to tag my bitcoin addresses etc to my

taxes (at least in my own files). Thus, doomed.

I will, however, let everyone else know when the above as you state happens so others can flee. Alas. My fate is likely sealed.

Brad



I am not talking about taxes, but an interesting story. I never used safety deposit box because i have no idea how safe it actually is (judging by the movies).

A somewhat unrelated "rant":
I think people under appreciate the difficulty (or maybe lack thereof?) of selling substantial $$ value of btc to fiat.
I intend to fully pay taxes (same Q) on whatever gains I would made when I sell, but transferring $$ from coinbase to a bank would probably require some talking to a banker first, I assume.
Bob opined before that there were no problem in his case (Gemini?), but I would approach it cautiously if and when the time comes (if ever).



906. Post 51599875 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: Pamoldar on June 25, 2019, 11:15:02 AM
Went to get a coffee - $11,444

Fuck!

@mic - Yessss Amsterdam party Wink

$15k soon possibly.

Bro, I’m enjoying this a lot more than the bear market we endured Cheesy
So much fun to check the price every day & mostly green.

Really enjoy the camaraderie in this thread. It’s good to have you lot to talk to about it, I don’t like to talk to my brother, family & friends about it because it feels like showing off. You guys are all on the train though so great to discuss Wink
And we always have this friend or close relative who will give you a look that you will feel yourself an Alien from another planet and get pissed LOL

IRL, except my wife I do not talk about it to anyone at all.

That's the problem sometimes: nobody (except here and/or wife) to talk to. People are periodically annoyed , then feeling pity for you, etc. So, i sublimate into stock market discussions. I know stock market from way back when, so it is not a problem. No-coiners always have these little "schemes" of how to make a gigantic score on the stock market (like 10%). Oh, well.



907. Post 51600216 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Here is some info about selling to fiat in US:

On the exchange side:

OTC-don't know, probably no limit, then wire. Gemini auction, Circle OTC? Circle 250K minimum.
Coinbase-at least up to 50K daily transfer is feasible. More-don't know.
Gemini-ACH up to 100K daily, Wire?
Kraken-up to 25K/day (Intermediate), 125K/day with POSOF (proof of source of funds-have to prove that you are an accredited investor); Pro (10 MM)-this is probably mostly for companies and family offices.
For some reason Kraken excludes TX from high value transfers (100K). Every other state is apparently OK (for 100K daily).

On the bank side:
Only anecdotal info. Not clear at what $$ one needs to talk to a banker prior to transfer (if ever). OTC probably does it for you.



908. Post 51604949 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

With this run, one should be on the lookout for a "crazy Ivan" (for those who haven't seen the "Red October"-try to see it).
We already had one from 8400 to 6100.
Running up a bit too fast now (not that I don't enjoy it).



909. Post 51605031 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on June 26, 2019, 05:08:20 AM
Holy fuck those Central Bankers sure know how to buy Cheesy

well, they always have more, lol.



910. Post 51612024 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: Globb0 on June 26, 2019, 11:01:34 AM
Mainstream news paper today (page 2)



I know for a fact that some misspelling of blockchain.info causes a "rogue" page that tries to seize your browser.
Related? Check the stuff that you type (for bitcoin-associated sites) or use bookmarks.



911. Post 51613344 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 26, 2019, 05:28:22 PM
So what is this I hear about horror stories of people making a test transaction out of a large old wallet only to fat finger the unspent change into an incompatible, unspendable address type??

Gis some background and context then.

https://news.bitcoin.com/everything-you-should-know-about-bitcoin-address-formats/

https://bitzuma.com/posts/five-ways-to-lose-money-with-bitcoin-change-addresses/



912. Post 51613614 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Ahem...we pierced 61.8 Fib retracement, next stop 78.6%.
Not sure if to calculate from just the top ($19780) or from the prior move (1160 to 19780=18620 points).
If the latter, then it is $15795; if the former, then $15547.



913. Post 51613686 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Why btc is going vertical?
Two possibilities:

1. We don't know something important.
2. We are being played.

I worry about the second, hoping for the first.
This is not something usual.



914. Post 51613795 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: arklan on June 26, 2019, 06:36:57 PM
i haven't been active here in months and only barely watching the crypto space - but the timing of facebook announcing libra and this spike i was really close from what i saw. i just assumed it was that.

have there been any other major news bombs this year? satoshi revealed? sha256 broken? something with quantum computing or other mining hardware news?

man i miss the mining... i wanna get back into it. only have like 50 something gigahash though... yes, giga. it's old stuff.

If you want something silent, then I suggest this (Terminus R606):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5131245.300

if you want something more-plenty of used S9 for sale on ebay, although they are getting expensive: from $150 a couple of months ago to about $400 now.
These make a lot of noise, so make sure you have an attachment and/or basement.



915. Post 51614063 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: Ibian on June 26, 2019, 06:48:33 PM
Why btc is going vertical?
Two possibilities:

1. We don't know something important.
2. We are being played.

I worry about the second, hoping for the first.
This is not something usual.

3. It's just the baby steps and you are girly man.

only the penitent man will pass
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkGTyndJC1w



916. Post 51614299 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Interestingly, GBTC premium actually decreased today to 27.8%.
again two possibilities:
1. Maybe ETF is about to be approved.
2. It predicts an incoming correction.

Hoping for #1, although IDGAF about an ETF.



917. Post 51614392 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: BitcoinNewsMagazine on June 26, 2019, 07:26:07 PM
Ahem...we pierced 61.8 Fib retracement, next stop 78.6%.
Not sure if to calculate from just the top ($19780) or from the prior move (1160 to 19780=18620 points).
If the latter, then it is $15795; if the former, then $15547.

Proper Fibonacci retracement levels:

https://bitcoinnewsmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/bitstamp-btcusd-Jun-26-2019-16-21-26.png

thanks for the accurate numbers. I see that it is counted from the decline, not from the previous run-up.
yet, the numbers are similar (16.1 vs 15.8K).

Quote from: gentlemand on June 26, 2019, 07:26:57 PM
Interestingly, GBTC premium actually decreased today to 27.8%.
again two possibilities:
1. Maybe ETF is about to be approved.
2. It predicts an incoming correction.

Is anyone bothering to monitor a correlation with the premium? I presume it's considerably less liquid than the conventional markets so some spikes may not be all that logical.

I do, but very infrequently. Previously, large run-ups in GBTC premium indicated a sharp short-term btc correction, like in mid June 2016, when premium was about 100%.



918. Post 51618089 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

"Men who can both be right and sit tight are uncommon." J. Livermore

BTC made it possible for a person who just "sit tight" to make a very nice return.
Almost everyone makes mistakes in trading/timing.
As long as you are bagging a 100-6000% return, don't worry about lousy timing that shaved an extra 10-20%.



919. Post 51625709 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on June 27, 2019, 04:29:23 PM
ok am long again

for hodling Ok, for trading-much too soon.
$8.6-9.1K is possible, even if very briefly.
I am trending to "we were setup" by a 'premature' mini-peak.
We will see how the tariff situation unveils at the G20.



920. Post 51625852 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: LoyceV on June 27, 2019, 04:43:49 PM
Going under $11,000 any second now, fuck you bears.
This (well, half of it) was a joke, not a guide:
A quick look at https://bitcoinaverage.com/en/bitcoin-price/btc-to-usd reveals we're right on track to my (wife's) $7800 prediction 3 days from now. Let's hope that's the one last bump before going to $30645 later this year Cheesy

if she would be right, can WO members consult with her about prices for a discount?  Cheesy
Cheers.

Quote from: infofront on June 27, 2019, 04:47:20 PM
I’ll take any of them but maybe in order -

3
2
1

Right to left basically.

I was thinking the exact opposite.

yea, the right one, but these fine females are too hot for me to handle anyway...sigh.



921. Post 51625965 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: kenzawak on June 27, 2019, 04:51:31 PM
Going under $11,000 any second now, fuck you bears.

It's done now. Under 11k. Angry

on stamp, kraken and pro; CMC average is still above, barely.



922. Post 51626795 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 27, 2019, 05:33:59 PM
Prediction: we will go through $10k like a hot knife through butter, just like we did on the way up. Then the screaming will start.

I don’t remember shit like this in 2015 as we were leaving the Gox induced bear market.

You just don't remember because of a lower $$ value, that's all.
2015:

July 12 about $317 (about 2X from january lows)

August 25 $198 (about 38% drawdown)

Nov 4 (sharp peak at $502, went up almost 57% in two days)

Nov 11 $295 (41% drawdown in a week).

Cheers, mate.
Source: https://bitcoincharts.com/charts/bitstampUSD



923. Post 51626858 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: Pipdips on June 27, 2019, 06:05:32 PM

You just don't remember because of a lower $$ value, that's all.
2015:

July 12 about $317 (about 2X from january lows)

August 25 $198 (about 38% drawdown)

Nov 4 (sharp peak at $502, went up almost 57% in two days)

Nov 11 $295 (41% drawdown in a week).

Cheers, mate.

But we are not talking percentages from when it was a few hundred dollars. Bitcoin is worth way more today than it was back then. This is not the same thing. It went down 3000 in a day.....

Always talk about percentages. It's the same thing. If you can't handle $ value, then you are clearly over-invested, pal.



924. Post 51626913 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on June 27, 2019, 06:05:03 PM
This is obscene, similar to what I imagine it’d be like to see your parents fucking in 30 degree celsius heat on a glass table.

 

Are any of you guys selling? What on earth happened?

SOLD ALL. this was the lower high after 20k and the lower low will follow.

same potentially incorrect logic would have applied in Nov 2015.
Oh, no, lower high of $500, sell sell sell...derp.



925. Post 51630773 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on June 28, 2019, 02:26:06 AM
If we can recover and hold above this line, this would represent an uninterrupted logarithmic bull market all the way back to 2011.  Surely this is the impossible dream?  This is why I am currently bearish.  But if we break and hold above, then all bets are off.


Nice graphs and interesting interpretation.
Why you call it "uninterrrupted", though?  
We seemed to plunge below the line last winter and only recently recovered only to dip just a bit below.



926. Post 51630818 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on June 28, 2019, 02:38:17 AM
Fair enough.  Perhaps uninterrupted is the wrong word.  But "straight line logarithmic" doesn't sound any better.  There is probably a better term.

The best fit for bitcoin prices during 2011-2019 is represented by a logarithmic curve with a current time value of 11445?



927. Post 51638093 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: afbitcoins on June 28, 2019, 04:19:16 PM
Just sharing an idea

https://www.tradingview.com/x/NE5XGgpZ/
chart

Yes, that time point was even mentioned already at least a couple of times.
Good news-it would mean unbelievable prices ahead (300K-500K)
bad news-it would go to 7000-8000 first, which would be cringe-worthy for many.
maybe we would not go and just stabilize for a while in the 10000-12000 range.
That would be peachy.
Of note, we are above the HM line (11445). That's better than I expected, personally.

Quote from: jbreher on June 28, 2019, 04:40:02 PM
Mike Novogratz: Bitcoin Will Stabilize Between $10,000 and $14,000

I disagree.

Please, elaborate.



928. Post 51638351 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

This guy graph suggests that we are at Base 4 of the parabolic move:

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/OyXoN573-Trading-Bitcoin-in-a-Parabolic-Curve-Possible-30-000-Top/

How do we post tradingview charts here (usual img followed by /img does not seem to work)? Do you need to be a member there to grab a proper html from the tradingview?



929. Post 51638455 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: jbreher on June 28, 2019, 05:01:42 PM
Mike Novogratz: Bitcoin Will Stabilize Between $10,000 and $14,000

I disagree.

Please, elaborate.

Bitcoin does not _stabilize_ until it becomes world money. We've not even started up the steep slope of the S-Curve yet.

But even speaking to the short term, I don't imagine we'll spend more than a quarter below 14K.

Well, I agree with this, of course (long term).
Novo was talking about short term, I suspect, being a trader as he is.



930. Post 51638566 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: fillippone on June 28, 2019, 05:16:13 PM
This works for me:
go to the share (speaker button bottom right corner of the chart)  button, copy image link and then paste here, with usual [img] tags (just higlight the link and press the IMG button.


Thanks, pal!



931. Post 51641053 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: Searing on June 28, 2019, 08:02:56 PM

I swear to god if it is proven that this F*ckup, Craig Wight, is Satoshi...I will sell my house/car/toys/etc, etc.

Then I will go 'Full Jack Reacher' with everything I own in cash or Bitcoin and be an extreme 'minimalist'.

We are talking debit card/toothbrush/Trezor in the pocket and there is the Total of al my possessions, and the clothes on my back.


It's difficult to think about these things, but look at it from this perspective:

it's january 1 and paper trust says that it would belong to CSW (if court does not say otherwise).
However, he DOES NOT have the private keys, by the looks of it.
then, we (and everybody else) win.

It's like getting an iphone or Trezor as your inheritance without the password and every time you try a new combo, it would give you longer and longer time to enter a new try.
See an interesting story here: https://www.wired.com/story/i-forgot-my-pin-an-epic-tale-of-losing-dollar30000-in-bitcoin/

Hopefully, he would not be able to hack it, though.



932. Post 51641185 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 28, 2019, 09:33:59 PM
It's difficult to think about these things, but look at it from this perspective:

Why bother taking the thinking that far?

There's not a shred of evidence about Dave Kleiman. There's certainly not a shred of evidence about our fave hysteric. There's not a shred of evidence about any coins anywhere.

There is some evidence (or at least I read about it) that there are about 1 mil btc in the trust.
Not sure if it is correct or not, but if it is incorrect, then these Florida proceedings make no sense.
They'd have to be over some issue (which I thought is the trust). Are you saying that the issue is made up?



933. Post 51648536 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: nutildah on June 29, 2019, 10:12:18 AM

I have roach on ignore but would be happy to counter his misinformation in this instance. Bitcoin (per coin on average) costs anywhere between $1,300 and $37,400 to mine depending on where you are in the world. As you can see, mining is prohibitively expensive in much of the world (this is based on today's prices):



https://coinrate.com/cryptocurrency-mining-prices-and-profitability-by-country-in-realtime

And yes, not anybody can just start up their own mining operation to get "cheap coins." Most mining farms operate in the red for months or years before turning a profit -- they are invested in the long haul and weather unprofitable periods on the bet that the price of BTC will continue to increase in the future.

Besides, roach should know as well as anybody that the market dictates prices. This is what gives BTC - like any traded good in the world - its premium.

aside from other valid arguments, this picture cannot be right, and even if it is for whole countries, at least in US, there are much-much cheaper regions where you can mine for much less.
With S9, you mine at break even right now at about 15.56c/Kwh.
https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/calculator/btc?HashingPower=13.5&HashingUnit=TH%2Fs&PowerConsumption=1350&CostPerkWh=0.156&MiningPoolFee=1
US average is 12c, so you do the math (my calc (12/15.56)X12000=$9254/btc mining breakeven cost after recouping fixed cost for S9 at the average US electricity cost).
Besides, we are talking about a machine that is a three year old tech. Newer machines have at least twice as better profitability, but they are still rare.
That said, miners also need to recoup their fixed cost (machines), so as far as P/L, the numbers are probably higher.
For example, current S9 (on ebay) will recoup it's cost (at 12c) in about 10 mo, but more realistically, later, due to difficulty increase.



934. Post 51648766 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on June 29, 2019, 03:08:24 PM
If it’s costing so little in places like the Ukraine then why aren’t Westerners flocking there & renting an apartment for 12 months to mine?

How much money could you realistically make?

I was in Kiev last summer & the city centre apartments were ok & really cheap.

...probably because they can find similar prices in US.
In industrial setting, 5c-6c/kwh is relatively common.
Also, people are being lazy and simply mine at so called hosting sites.
It costs more, but no noise, etc. The mining machines are typically VERY noisy.



935. Post 51651399 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.53h):

Quote from: jojo69 on June 29, 2019, 07:17:54 PM
"inertial mass reduction device"

looks like that junk in the basement at Roswell finally paid off

if it was true, that would be insane..., but i give it less than 10-6 probability.



936. Post 51661574 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on June 30, 2019, 04:51:50 PM
Approaching a Sunday special??

Is there such a thing, even?

I took my "for the year" profits during a first dip (slowly...aka JJG style).
Needed some dough for house-related projects.
Now, I am ready for whatever comes next.



937. Post 51661945 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Not a price prediction by any means, just a historical analysis based on a similarity between June 2019 and Nov 2015 local tops:

If we are to litererally follow the 2015 scenario (and we likely won't), then we should bottom at about $8300, then go parabolic from there.
Considering that the graph is a bit smoothed already, I say that 9300-9600 might be possible, short term.
In Nov 2015 we went 20% down in the second leg, almost vertically.
That would be about 2200 points now, give or take.
I am not setting up buys there yet, though, as the whole thing is purely theoretical...for all i know, maybe we will just continue the bull from here.



938. Post 51665076 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: philipma1957 on June 30, 2019, 10:23:01 PM
Fucking 7 day Twitter timeout for calling some talentless blue-checkmark whore a “talentless whore”. Nice to see $10,000 again. When $20,000 ? Guess I’ll hang out here for a bit. Have been having a blast on Twitter trolling the ever loving crap out of BCH and BSV supporters.

#hodl



Yeah  BCH and BSV are not for me.

I keep mining away.  Doing okay.

Coins are dirt cheap for me now about 4000 in power for a coin.

I don’t need charts for my price predictions.

20k by 2020 Jan 1

30k + by 2020 April 1

These numbers are entirely possible, but so are other numbers as well.
The path is not very predictable with a trend upwards, of course.



939. Post 51665588 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

what's new around here?
bitcoin's going up and down
to hodl is the way



940. Post 51665626 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: Dunkelheit667 on July 01, 2019, 12:12:59 AM
The monthly update:



Dear Bears,

As HairyMaclairy already mentioned, you have painted a wonderful weekly Doji! The 22% discount really helps during this accumulation phase.


Interesting...so far NEVER more than 5 straight positive months.
We just closed our fifth straight. I don't think that we are precluded, though.
Total: 66 positive (60 green, 6 yellow) and 43 negative (red) months.
The probability of next being green or yellow (low positive) is probably [66/(66+43)]X100= 60.55%



941. Post 51665658 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

A guy spends 7 straight days in VR:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGRY14znFxY

conclusions:
1. RL is still better (yet).
2. All people started resembling MPCs, afterwards. Weird, I guess.

Bitcoin....unaffected.



942. Post 51672818 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on July 01, 2019, 04:29:21 PM
This may be one of the most important things I've ever written about Bitcoin.

We are watching a currency attempt to attain global reserve status without ever engaging in a single conflict.

https://twitter.com/apompliano/status/1145645763969470465?s=21

Living up to his name, I guess.
I just want for this to grow.
If states want to make part of their reserves in bitcoin, I am fine with it.



943. Post 51674313 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 01, 2019, 06:41:21 PM
@JJG

I was a lot worse in 2014 as we were slicing downwards like a knife through hot butter. I invested £xx,000 of my hard earned fiat & I thought for a long time that I’d seriously fucked up (obviously I’ve been buying ever since but my maximum fear came in 2014).
Obviously that all turned out well & I’m sitting on huge profits atm, more than I could ever achieve in life anywhere else probably.

Anyhow, I felt that I had been making decent investments all of my life, but I tended to invest in index funds and things like that and also I tended not to venture out too much, but even before I had gotten into bitcoin in late 2013, some of my investments had gone up 30% or more in some years, and did not perform as well in other years, but still overall I was ONLY getting a return of an average of about 6% per year, and I have not completely gotten rid of those traditional investments (many of them index funds that are tied into 401ks), but they still are only returning in about an 6% per year average.

So, I figured that even if bitcoin returned a bit less than 6%, at least it seems to have a decent sized asymmetric bet component that also allows a hedge against my dollar investment and nothing else had even come close, even though I used to consider that gold could be in the hedge category, but not necessarily in the asymmetric category.

So, anyhow, it seems to me (and you seem to recognize it too) that largely, historically regular pleebs did not tend to have access to these kinds of investments.


I have a very similar story-a good IRA+regular account, was not satisfied with the fact that we have very limited investment opportunities there (no private companies, etc.)
I fully realized it when FB went public at 100-120bil valuation (BTW, AMZN only at $1 bil, but in a better time for regular investors).
There were literally dozens of funds which "feasted" on FB from a few mil to 120 bil.
I thought that it is a good time to start looking at asymmetrical deals and bitcoin was the first and the largest by far. I dabbled in others, to a limited degree (call it a hedge).
That said, I feel quite holistic about it. By selling a small part, I might be widening the circle, hopefully.

TL;DR bitcoin investment is like a private equity deal on a very promising venture. You can never get these (in bulk), unless you are Bono, lol.




944. Post 51674662 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: soxxx on July 01, 2019, 07:54:28 PM
could it be somehow that we're currently watching the burst of a mini bubble between the last major bubble and the next major bubble after halving in 2020? maybe it was to early for the next real bubble.

I doubt it.   You seem to be giving too much benefit of the doubt to bear narratives and or bitcoin is a bubble FUDsters.


We are just experiencing a normal correction that comes from a short-term period of too much exuberance.  You saw that exuberance from a few days ago, no?   Outrageously excessive for a period of time, so we could hardly have expected that level of excessive exuberance to NOT correct at some point.
We need a 30% correction...

Amost there (currently 26.4%)
A small observation: we are declining faster than most "shitcoins', not sure why.



945. Post 51688564 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 03, 2019, 02:13:14 AM
Now I have to get out of bed

To close a small short, right?   Cool



946. Post 51688834 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Libra gets a nastygram.

Quote
It appears that these products [Libra/calibra] may lend themselves to an entirely new global financial system that is based off of Switzerland and intended to rival US monetary policy and the dollar...it is imperative that Facebook and its partners immediately cease implementing plans...

https://twitter.com/apompliano?lang=en



947. Post 51689609 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on July 03, 2019, 05:34:54 AM
Grain-of-Salt Dept: Twitter is calling for this run to top out around $17k.

I just report the news.


17k would be above 3X Mayer multiple if it happens soonish.
See his tweet of June 24
https://twitter.com/TraceMayer/status/1143059448786636800
possible, but what's the rush?



948. Post 51699096 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

At the moment, I am not very impressed by the lower highs and lower lows.
That said, it would be nice to pop up above 12.5K (so i can lose yet another Q game, lol).



949. Post 51706999 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: fillippone on July 04, 2019, 02:36:53 PM
Pompliano 75% Confident Bitcoin Price is $100,000 by End of 2021

Quote
Anthony “Pomp” Pompliano — co-founder of crypto asset management firm Morgan Creek Digital Assets — predicts bitcoin (BTC) will hit $100,000 by the end of 2021.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/pompliano-75-confident-bitcoin-price-is-100-000-by-end-of-2021

https://twitter.com/APompliano/status/1146707848279150592


Being 75% Confident Bitcoin Price is $100,000 by End of 2021 equals being 100% Confident Bitcoin Price is $75,000 by End of 2021?
Serious question.
Asking for a friend.


No. it does not.
If someone like statistics, mic's Q3 game median is at about 17.7K right now.
Wisdom of the crowds?



950. Post 51707313 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: d_eddie on July 04, 2019, 03:02:44 PM
So these are not just futures but it will allow them to settle in physical bitcoin?
This would mean it is no longer just a bet on the price of bitcoin but it is actually a buy and sell of it.
https://www.coindesk.com/td-ameritrade-backed-erisx-gets-green-light-to-settle-futures-in-bitcoin

Some have a difficult time trying to grasp the concept of what they are trying to do.
Until now a physical settlement has not been allowed because the cftc was not convinced any wall street firm could hold on to bitcoin safely within these so called custodial services.  Hence this is another move forward on the development of the bitcoin infrastructure and ecosystem.
Indeed if settling in bitcoin, it is necessary that both parts hold as much physical bitcoin as necessary. Otherwise, with sufficient volatility, insolvency will ensue. That's one of the reasons I think in-kind ETFs and derivatives are medium term bullish AF.

Bitcoin tracker one (CXBTF) continues to experience regulator-induced difficulties trading in US despite the fact that is has been trading in Sweden for years already with nary a problem.
That vehicle has no premium to NAV in comparison with Barry Silbert 's concoctions that trade with high premiums (GBTC and ETHE).
Who said that US regulators play a fair game? Maybe we should ask Bra-Arg game referee?



951. Post 51709119 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Majority thinks that we will go above ATH as early as July.
Maybe, but then it would mean that we are going parabolic early and probably will fizzle out much earlier than 50-100K (more like 30-34K).
Somehow, I feel that there are lots of whales (Mayer, Novogratz, etc) who want the next peak later and much higher.

I tend to agree that later and higher peak would be desirable.



952. Post 51721188 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on July 05, 2019, 02:48:37 PM
Genders?

Of course there are more than 2 genders. Gender is a grammatical term... masculine, feminine, neuter, common, etc.

There are 3 sexes: male, female and hermaphrodite. That's a simple matter of anatomy.

Gender: a social construct

Sexes: typically as you say, but with complication due to various chromosomal syndroms.
There are XX who are males, there are XY who are females (due to SRY gene mutation).
Typically, though, a presence of Y chromosome is a strong inducer of masculinity. For example, even XXXY are mostly males.
List of syndromes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_chromosome_anomalies

_________

Don't really like the fact that we are going to the weekend on the downswing in btc price.



953. Post 51721749 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Bouncing up from 10800 on pro.



954. Post 51733089 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

A serious dream:
To be able to invest a small portion of, hopefully, appreciated btc in a couple years into Planetary Resources (or something similar).
We will own the stars!
Asteroids come first, though.



955. Post 51733246 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

NIRP results in incredible mortgage interest rates in Germany: 0.4-1.5% for a 20 year loan.
https://thebanks.eu/compare-banking-products/mortgage-loans/Germany
Coming soon to US of A?

Quote from: jojo69 on July 06, 2019, 09:55:59 PM


pew pew pew  Grin



956. Post 51736114 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

bitcoin is resting
until  the autumn solstice,
then up up we go



957. Post 51744080 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

late Sunday...

indomitable
bitcoin is for you and me
to be like the wind



958. Post 51744833 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on July 07, 2019, 08:32:22 PM
Big, important thread alert:

There is a lot going on in Europe that feels like it's coming to a head soon... probably by the end of the summer. The EU economy is in mild recession...

https://twitter.com/RaoulGMI/status/1147878009870983169

We have to buy and HODL BTC

Very informative. Bonds are going into a 'black hole' in EU.
Why people are still buying them? When this 'crazyness' is going to end?
The rec of a $, bonds, gold and bitcoin mix sounds kind of weird, albeit I agree on no equities, though.
BTW, here are the news on DB restructuring:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/07/investing/deutsche-bank-layoffs/index.html



959. Post 51747039 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.54h):

Interesting. What is the NAV of these claims? Didn't they recover 250K BTC out of 800K?
So, you are basically entitled to roughly (2.5/8)X11.5K=$3.59K in btc
However, inept Kobayashi probably sold some at the lower price that today's.
Anyway, Fortress makes a very low offer (just 25% of the claim's fair value, and not more that 35%).
cough-bastards-cough



960. Post 51756125 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Last month does look similar to a 'reverse head and shoulders', which is quite bullish.
We shall see. It would probably surge once above 12500, hopefully.



961. Post 51756164 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: _javi_ on July 08, 2019, 07:50:05 PM
Two big green dildos in one day...  Roll Eyes

vicious BTC  Grin

We shall call it 'Bit Vicious'

or if only talking about today's happenings...'Bid Vicious'  Cool



962. Post 51756695 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: Searing on July 08, 2019, 08:59:19 PM
Last month does look similar to a 'reverse head and shoulders', which is quite bullish.
We shall see. It would probably surge once above 12500, hopefully.

The catch is, what do you look at for odds? (guesses?)

Who knows. Just using the same mental gymnastics I would use with a 'hot' bi-polar girlfriend.

When it is good it is very, very good!

When it is bad, it is very, very bad.

Trademark Bitcoin: 'Doing The Opposite Of What Everyone Expects Since 2009!


"Well, dude, we just don't know" (a quote from a famous movie)
Same with bipolarity.
in 2017 it always looked scary, but it went up 20X.
Who knew?
It is impossible to predict a top exactly OR it could be age-related.
it is tough to hodl in place when you are not a spring chicken anymore, "but try we must".



963. Post 51757866 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

in a moment of a brief bitcoin rest (EDIT: oops, here it goes again) I give you a funky cockatoo:

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/07/snowball-the-dancing-cockatoo-has-wide-range-of-killer-moves-new-study-finds/

https://youtu.be/_N-EMumuHhI
https://youtu.be/TC272vDZOfU

Apparently, it is a big deal as he is NOT imitating anyone in the room and he has at least 16 dance moves (about 12-14 more than I have, lol).




964. Post 51757932 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: sirazimuth on July 09, 2019, 02:00:46 AM
Pop
..goes the weasel.



965. Post 51767314 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 09, 2019, 07:15:02 PM
Bitcoin crosses 64% dominance on cmc

The relentless Agony of the Alts...

Very nice to see on cmc a sea of red except for BTC.

And speaking of alts, (yeah, sorry bout that)....
....the winner of pop and flop shitcoin-of-the-day is.... Egretia   <prolonged whoopee cushion sound>

I am so badly disillusioned by shitcoins I don’t think I am capable of taking any blockchain project seriously.  And that’s probably not a good thing, because if something genuinely good does come along I will probably just reject it out of hand.

I am not disillusioned with a specific comment that some are a mess, some too self-dealing and others are not even "real" crypto.
The downswing in alts had happened before and I am not sure if market dynamics favors just one coin.
Typically, in most other markets, there are at least a few dominant players (maybe FB and GOOG are the exceptions). We shall see.
I am certainly not selling any bitcoin for alts.



966. Post 51769133 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Suddenly, we are approaching almost a 2/3 share of ALL cryptoassets.

maybe.. "We are back, we are baaaack, we are baaaaack"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgnlzesChRc



967. Post 51769193 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: sirazimuth on July 10, 2019, 01:31:47 AM
The next halving has had no effect on the price - how could it since it hasn't happened yet? its a year away, so an argument can't even be made that its speculation effect of increased halving price.

Arguments can be made; they are made all the time, including an argument that efficient markets "price in" future known events, so since the halvening is a known event, the question becomes a matter of how much it is priced in rather than whether it is priced in.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

is it "halving" or "halvening"?
enquiring minds need to know....


halving-from an old english word (Middle english, possibly the proper way to write/say it)
halvening-sounds cool (like 'quickening')



968. Post 51769669 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 10, 2019, 03:18:17 AM
I envy those that can actually trade the short term waves with enough consistent certainty to make a better long term profit than just holding. I'm not sure I've ever actually met one of those mythical traders, they might be unicorns. Grin

If aiming realistically and conservatively, it doesn't take a unicorn to do that. I guess more than a few such people are reading and writing these very pages. It doesn't even take a WO peep (well, just as a brainwasher maybe). Case in point: JJG's mom could do that almost in her sleep, but decided not to be bothered cause she prefers to enjoy life.

If you can learn the difference between a bear market and a bull market (hint: we are in a bull market) then you can trade for a profit.  Dollar cost average in in a bull market. Dollar cost average out in a bear market.

If you can’t tell the difference, then sit on your hands.

This is the opposite of JJGs advice because you buy on the way up and sell on the way down.  The difference is JJGs system doesn’t require you to make a judgment call. Mine does.

...which has made me very, very rich.......

it's not yours until that profit is taken and taxes paid (if you live in a jurisdiction with cap gains taxes).
Wall street refers to a large profit of a lucky individual investor as "a loan".

A deviation to the upside in most cases is followed by a deviation to the downside.
Taking a large profit  and/or not playing at all after deviation to the upside is the only way to beat the odds, IMHO.
The problem is WHEN to take such large profit. In AMZN you had to wait more than 20 years to get the 'full" benefit.
IMHO, Bob's strategy was brilliant: get in very low, then take out a large enough chunk to matter, ride the rest, at least for a while.



969. Post 51769855 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 10, 2019, 04:12:02 AM
I envy those that can actually trade the short term waves with enough consistent certainty to make a better long term profit than just holding. I'm not sure I've ever actually met one of those mythical traders, they might be unicorns. Grin

If aiming realistically and conservatively, it doesn't take a unicorn to do that. I guess more than a few such people are reading and writing these very pages. It doesn't even take a WO peep (well, just as a brainwasher maybe). Case in point: JJG's mom could do that almost in her sleep, but decided not to be bothered cause she prefers to enjoy life.

If you can learn the difference between a bear market and a bull market (hint: we are in a bull market) then you can trade for a profit.  Dollar cost average in in a bull market. Dollar cost average out in a bear market.

If you can’t tell the difference, then sit on your hands.

This is the opposite of JJGs advice because you buy on the way up and sell on the way down.  The difference is JJGs system doesn’t require you to make a judgment call. Mine does.

...which has made me very, very rich.......

it's not yours until that profit is taken and taxes paid (if you live in a jurisdiction with cap gains taxes).
Wall street refers to a large profit of a lucky individual investor as "a loan".

A deviation to the upside in most cases is followed by a deviation to the downside.
Taking a large profit  and/or not playing at all after deviation to the upside is the only way to beat the odds, IMHO.
The problem is WHEN to take such large profit. In AMZN you had to wait more than 20 years to get the 'full" benefit.
IMHO, Bob's strategy was brilliant: get in very low, then take out a large enough chunk to matter, ride the rest, at least for a while.

Are you trying to ruin dee moo, Biodom?

If a person has value in an investment, whether bitcoin or otherwise, there can also be some freeing up of other money/value... or at least freedom to spend money in other locations, whether in a bank account or other resources, because he knows that he has the value in the investment, such as bitcoin.  

Of course, he can make adjustments to the value on the investment depending upon the hypothetical time that he is going to cash it in, or even to have some tentative reservations of the value based on not knowing exactly when the investment is going to be liquidated.  Real property tends to be much more cumbersome to liquidate than a 401k, and gold would likely be difficult too, absent having some avenues of liquidation.  Bitcoin seems to be much more easy to liquidate, even though some of the liquidation avenues might change from time to time, including the fact that bitcoin is only 10 years old, so liquidation avenues have changed during that time too.. so one of the costs of maintaining bitcoin could be having some ideas about what liquidation avenues might be available for amounts chosen to liquidated and when.

dee moo???
I guess it's "the mood"...

People here are mostly "drunk" with their 10-100X gains and think that it would continue, essentially, forever (until btc is 1-10mil).
I wouldn't mind that at all, but I give this scenario maybe 10% probability.
Much more likely is the next peak at 35-300K (most likely around 150K), followed by a multiyear proper whooping.
What if such whooping will end up not the usual 80-85%, but 95% lower?
200k back to 10k? A proper teeth gnashing would ensue and most people would sell, most likely closer to the lows than highs.

I had this experience before (when Internet boom turned to bust). There were literally no bids for some stocks. Could it happen with bitcoin?
I don't know.
however, for now, you are right, let's enjoy dee moo.



970. Post 51777870 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 10, 2019, 09:47:08 AM
Hey, I just met you and this is crazy
But here's my number [$13,356], so call me maybe

Could not reach you at your number, but you may call me back at $12313.55
Signed: Lady L.

 Grin



971. Post 51778466 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Theory: we got "smashed" today because of all the noise coming out with regards to the wretched two headed monster from FB.
The organic growth of bitcoin is/was so much better than a sudden harsh light caused by that (L-C) development.
I always thought that there would be no positives and only negatives from it (contrary to many other opinions including those from Novo and Andreas).

Quote from: d_eddie on July 10, 2019, 07:36:31 PM
https://imgflip.com/i/35cogb

Damn r0ach the woman ain’t coocking today  Undecided  Undecided

Scallops uh? And white wine. Looks yummy. But cryptoqueeen?? A salad with fizzy red wine? Oh noes. I'll go out on a limb and guess it's sweet, even  Roll Eyes

Scallops are not vegetarian anyway. If so, why not get a kebab instead?



972. Post 51778517 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: d_eddie on July 10, 2019, 07:39:30 PM
Masterluc on Telegram yesterday.

Quote from: Masterluc_on_Telegram
Among girls: on the whole, I'm tired of it all. My forecasts are not what they used to be, I do them without the former grasp and vision. Vanga has fattened and settled down...

But to be honest, according to the latest situation on the market, I can say that the short-term bearish picture again suddenly deteriorates. Just wanted to say it.

I like his honesty about losing his magic.

not sure why he (supposedly) is referring to himself as a female?
maybe masterluc is a 'babushka'?



973. Post 51778550 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: d_eddie on July 10, 2019, 07:44:19 PM
Theory: we got "smashed" today because of all the noise coming out with regards to the wretched two headed monster from FB.
The organic growth of bitcoin is/was so much better than a sudden harsh light caused by that (L-C) development.
I always thought that there would be no positives and only negatives from it (contrary to many other opinions including those from Novo and Andreas).

https://imgflip.com/i/35cogb

Damn r0ach the woman ain’t coocking today  Undecided  Undecided

Scallops uh? And white wine. Looks yummy. But cryptoqueeen?? A salad with fizzy red wine? Oh noes. I'll go out on a limb and guess it's sweet, even  Roll Eyes

Scallops are not vegetarian anyway. If so, why not get a kebab instead?


You got a problem with scallops? Apart from the price, I mean.

Nope, they taste like chicken. Only mentioned it because mic said that that he might be turning vegetarian (as his gf).



974. Post 51778635 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

an interesting setup in eth/btc:
eth/btc went below support at 0.024, latest seen in march of 2017
It would either turn around right here or continue until at least 0.022 or lower with Dec 2016 low of about 0.0077.
Most likely a good short, but I am not betting.



975. Post 51778977 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

An episode of "A life with bipolar" as Brad would say aka "Shameless".



976. Post 51779475 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: Elwar on July 10, 2019, 09:38:00 PM
I am glad to see these small corrections on the way up.

Once the price doubles in a month we are weeks away from the end of the bull run. It almost did that already going up from $7500 to $13,880. For the next week or so $16k would be the doubling.

The longer we avoid doubling in a month the longer the bull run. Let it grow slowly for the next year. Then double when we hit $100k and sit back and watch the fireworks.

Exactly...I was checking the same and drew similar conclusions.
We were overheating at 13.8K, albeit I prefer a flat to a zig-zag, but a flat is usually not the bitcoin's way (especially when 20-100X leverage is available for some).



977. Post 51781467 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 11, 2019, 04:28:29 AM
This dip should go no lower than about $10,690.  



Something "interesting" happened to the "fork".
it suddenly declined 20%.

Additionally, bitcoin, as an asset, has one weakness: it is too darn volatile for something that has above 200 bil market cap, just look at the last two weeks..



978. Post 51781604 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 11, 2019, 04:42:42 AM
Does anyone understand why BTC is currently so volatile? What's the reason of all these pump&dumps?  Huh

This is Bitcoin.

Additionally, bitcoin, as an asset, has one weakness: it is too darn volatile for something that has above 200 bil market cap, just look at the last two weeks..

The market cap of the SP500 is 24 trillion and it declined 24% between 1 October and Christmas day

/fucksnotgiven

more like 19.8% and that's three months, pal, vs 14 days and i was talking about day-to-day volatility. /fucksgiven

a move to 7.5-8.5K could be in the cards.
Something that is similar, but maybe shallower than this:
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/OcS8j9al-Possible-retest-of-the-6k-area/



979. Post 51782465 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: kurious on July 11, 2019, 07:00:39 AM
Hypercritical

"What did you think this was all about? Fun and games?"

Quote from: mindrust on July 11, 2019, 07:03:53 AM
Everyhing is awesome.



indeed
https://youtu.be/StTqXEQ2l-Y?t=5



980. Post 51791841 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 11, 2019, 10:14:30 PM
Remember the prophecy

Sorry, what is this about?

in other news..Powell's testimony in senate is all libra, libra...calibra.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfNFPr8eJZM
Bottom line: they don't have a mandate to regulate it (yet).
Will they (L/C) crowd out our mindshare?



981. Post 51803500 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 12, 2019, 10:05:34 PM
I haven’t written a check since 2002.  And the last time I saw someone actually use a check was almost 10 years ago. It’s astonishing that they still exist in some parts of the world. 

Well, in US some vendors (plumbers, electricians, roofers) take checks because they want to avoid 3% (or higher) credit card fee on their services.
Check cost nothing to deposit. We also have something called electronic check, which is probably another word for ACH (you can pay utilities and taxes with it).
It saves municipalities the same 3%.

Does your part of the world have FREE electronic payment (apart from el checks and ACH)? If yes, kudos.
Otherwise, you are forcing a fee on merchants.

Other than that, not much use for checks.



982. Post 51812480 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: jbreher on July 13, 2019, 05:40:38 PM
Fed Chair Jerome Powell: "Bitcoin is a Store of Value like Gold...*almost nobody uses it as a payment system."

Don't know if this is a good thing or bad.

Good thing is, he thinks bitcoin is in the same league with gold. A store of value.

Bad thing is, he also thinks nobody uses btc to pay for services which is absolutely not true. BTC is having troubles handling high load that's true but it doesn't mean nobody uses it for that purpose.

DISKUSS!

*, he said almost.

Discussion: The sitting chair of the FED -- in an official capacity -- has publicly mentioned Bitcoin as filling a similar role to gold. The sitting chair of the FED. Publicly. In an official capacity.

Cogitate. Let that sink in for a moment.

Mixed feelings:

1. They think that it is valuable, but tame/tameable?
2. They want to suppress its price?
3. They think that it would be worth more or much more in the future?
4. They might buy some (just in case), maybe later when they could buy a bit without disturbing the price much.

Quote from: El duderino_ on July 13, 2019, 08:32:06 PM
via Imgflip Meme Generator

...Gonna f***ing empty the place here??

Cheesy Cheesy

...mic proceeds with eating all bread on a plate.



983. Post 51821693 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

sad morning feelings
golden cross to the rescue
bitcoin will rise soon



984. Post 51822840 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on July 14, 2019, 03:45:12 PM
For a long time now, I've had the plan to buy a new car for 1 Bitcoin.
Since Bitcoin is totally moving moving in the wrong direction, I washed my car today Tongue



Can I get a summary of the reason for this drop in price? I read some theories about Trump posting something on Twitter, but do people still listen to billionaires who have a huge interest in conventional dollars to protect?

We’re still in a baby bull market, just like in 2015 we had seemingly significant breakthroughs with positive price surges only to get dumped straight back to square one.

As for Trump, I don’t think his tweets have had any effect seeing as though if we were going to dump hard it would have been immediately after the tweets not days after.

Nothing to worry about, 2019-20 is the 2015-16 of the last cycle.

The huge surge will happen end of 2020 or 2021 imo.

I wonder where we will steady out? fibs upon fibs upon fibs.
I hope for not less than 9k, but if we are to fully retrace the last fast advance, then somewhere around 8K.



985. Post 51823155 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: CristiTCM on July 14, 2019, 04:04:05 PM

I hope you are right this time...your past predictions were not so accurate Tongue


I will never be a millionaire through BTC.
I hope in a dream world 1 BTC could be worth say 5000 USD maybe 20 years from now.
I could buy a nice house mortgage free.
All a dream though of course.

btc is being chased by UK housing prices, lol.
his idea of a nice house might have changed too with age as it usually does.



986. Post 51825974 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Tennis (men's final) was great too.



987. Post 51827243 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

without opining on post-halving/halvening course, it would be interesting if 2019 is a mini-me of 2013.

13.8K would represent a first peak (342% up)
6.6K-9K and in any case less than 73% (50-73% most likely) decline would represent the equivalent of the 2013 summer doldrums.
The second leg up: from, say, $8.4K to 28.7K or from 6.6K to 22.57K or from 9K to 30.8K (the latter two map the outlier marks of the destination).
Explanation: I chose percentages of the upside in the second leg to be the same as the first leg (as they were similar between two 'legs' in 2013 as well).

Quote from: WinslowIII on July 14, 2019, 10:34:15 PM
Tennis (men's final) was great too.

Boring. Money has ruined sports. Back in the 70s winning Wimbledon meant something because the winner needed the money - there was a lot at stake, and that totally made the drama. These bazillionaires playing today were only playing for another feather in their caps. So GD boring I had to fast forward most of it. The effects of the ability to print money out of thin air is seen everywhere, but especially with sports. What a fucking joke our world has become because of fiat.

Somewhat true, especially in football (soccer). Mediocre players are being sold for £50mil.
Players which are OK, but not really great-above £120 mil (Coutinho and Dembele).



988. Post 51828158 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 14, 2019, 11:51:46 PM
without opining on post-halving/halvening course, it would be interesting if 2019 is a mini-me of 2013.

13.8K would represent a first peak (342% up)
6.6K-9K and in any case less than 73% (50-73% most likely) decline would represent the equivalent of the 2013 summer doldrums.
The second leg up: from, say, $8.4K to 28.7K or from 6.6K to 22.57K or from 9K to 30.8K (the latter two map the outlier marks of the destination).
Explanation: I chose percentages of the upside in the second leg to be the same as the first leg (as they were similar between two 'legs' in 2013 as well).

Even though we might be able to have two peaks, y0our comparison does not even seem close to me, unless either you:  1) count the first 2013 peak as the 2017 $19,666, then that would mean that the next peak is to come or 2) this $13,880 cannot be a peak except to be a kind of late 2015 peak of $504, which is just an intermediate stage, but anyhow under a second "two peaks theory" then the two peaks would still be to come, so maybe we would have a peak this year and another one next year, but the peaks still have to each be ATHs like they were in 2013... so anyhow, I am getting all screwed in the head merely attempting to rebutt your $13,880 peak theory because $13,880 is no kind of meaningful peak, its just an intermediate stop, like a baby peak (or a baby bullhorn spouting out of its little head before dee bull grows UPpity)

If you forget about the 19780 peak (for the sake of an argument) and focus on the $3122 low as the new bull market start, then $13.8K is a first local peak of the two-peak hypothesis and $22.57K-30.8K peak would be the second one. There is no rule that the first local peak of any move HAS to be above ATH.
BTW, it is not clear yet if $13.8K is a short term stop or a medium term (few months) peak.



989. Post 51828214 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.55h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 15, 2019, 02:05:05 AM
Dominance 66% (not that it means anything but still nice to see alts suffer)

It's going to kill the business model of all crypto exchanges, not that I care too much about that.
Maybe it would happen and crypto market would resemble search or social instead of resembling the stock market.
First we got "Cambrian speciation" and now seem to be having an "asteroid event".



990. Post 51829048 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 15, 2019, 04:37:22 AM
without opining on post-halving/halvening course, it would be interesting if 2019 is a mini-me of 2013.

13.8K would represent a first peak (342% up)
6.6K-9K and in any case less than 73% (50-73% most likely) decline would represent the equivalent of the 2013 summer doldrums.
The second leg up: from, say, $8.4K to 28.7K or from 6.6K to 22.57K or from 9K to 30.8K (the latter two map the outlier marks of the destination).
Explanation: I chose percentages of the upside in the second leg to be the same as the first leg (as they were similar between two 'legs' in 2013 as well).

Even though we might be able to have two peaks, y0our comparison does not even seem close to me, unless either you:  1) count the first 2013 peak as the 2017 $19,666, then that would mean that the next peak is to come or 2) this $13,880 cannot be a peak except to be a kind of late 2015 peak of $504, which is just an intermediate stage, but anyhow under a second "two peaks theory" then the two peaks would still be to come, so maybe we would have a peak this year and another one next year, but the peaks still have to each be ATHs like they were in 2013... so anyhow, I am getting all screwed in the head merely attempting to rebutt your $13,880 peak theory because $13,880 is no kind of meaningful peak, its just an intermediate stop, like a baby peak (or a baby bullhorn spouting out of its little head before dee bull grows UPpity)

If you forget about the 19780 peak (for the sake of an argument) and focus on the $3122 low as the new bull market start, then $13.8K is a first local peak of the two-peak hypothesis and $22.57K-30.8K peak would be the second one. There is no rule that the first local peak of any move HAS to be above ATH.
BTW, it is not clear yet if $13.8K is a short term stop or a medium term (few months) peak.

I still stand by my previous post.

You can neither assume away the most important context, which is the $19,666 peak form late 2017 nor can you suggest that the fact that $13,880 is not an ATH is not a relevant consideration.  Snap into reality and deal with the real and certainly relevant facts, Biodom.   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



Makes little sense to make a scenario that does not account for real and materially important contextual components that likely underly BTC price drives and current ongoing BTC price dynamics.

ya, ya...If my scenario has a chance (aka we go deep to 6.6K-9K), then buying some at those levels (rather than buying right here) would be more sensible.



991. Post 51837916 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Bitcoin is not here to help everyone, although it is a desirable goal.
Realistically, bitcoin is here as a relatively rare "allele" that just might prevent total financial ruin of everyone.
Smart people did the math and realized the eventual fate of pretty much all fiat.
Bitcoin is a great hedge. Unfortunately, stupid FB caused too much of a premature attention to the scene.
Could bitcoin continue to be the hedge? I hope so, but it would probably involve some ups and downs (and more of them).



992. Post 51839226 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

An interesting graph of a strange correlation between the drop in btc dominance in 2017 and searches in google:
https://www.docdroid.net/dg7lL8W/bitcoin-stealth-phase.pdf#page=4

Quote
Data suggest Bitcoin will continue to lead the current cryptocurrency industry bull market. When
more public interest starts to pick up, it may be optional to diverse [divest] Bitcoin profits into other cryptocurrencies.

Very debatable (at least).
I am also curious on whether we would peak somewhere between now and 70ies OR go all the way to 90-95% in dominance.
The major alt is faltering both economically and ideologically.
In fact, VB recently proposed a strange hybrid of eth with "the fork".
My conclusion: eth chain is blowing up in size and there are still years to go before they might even approach a solution.
The size is already not manageable for a full node/regular user.

Conclusion: the time to divest into current alts is probably never, but i don't dismiss beyond the horizon newcomers yet.



993. Post 51847625 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 16, 2019, 05:01:07 AM
An interesting graph of a strange correlation between the drop in btc dominance in 2017 and searches in google:
https://www.docdroid.net/dg7lL8W/bitcoin-stealth-phase.pdf#page=4

Quote
Data suggest Bitcoin will continue to lead the current cryptocurrency industry bull market. When
more public interest starts to pick up, it may be optional to diverse [divest] Bitcoin profits into other cryptocurrencies.

Very debatable (at least).
I am also curious on whether we would peak somewhere between now and 70ies OR go all the way to 90-95% in dominance.
The major alt is faltering both economically and ideologically.
In fact, VB recently proposed a strange hybrid of eth with "the fork".
My conclusion: eth chain is blowing up in size and there are still years to go before they might even approach a solution.
The size is already not manageable for a full node/regular user.

Conclusion: the time to divest into current alts is probably never, but i don't dismiss beyond the horizon newcomers yet.

On another side note that is more about BTC specifically, Biodom, when we were in the $10k-ish prices, weren't you waiting to buy more BTC in the $6.6k to $9k arena? So perhaps you put off buying some BTC on that particular price swing?  How's that portion of your plan that speculates waiting for lower lows playing out?
<snip>

Still waiting, but I am fine with not buying and just hodling.



994. Post 51848135 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 16, 2019, 09:47:23 AM
Which reminds me, I have fallen behind on posting nice Jewish ladies that you could take home to מוטע



Ashton Kutcher might object (to taking this lady home, etc.).



995. Post 51848695 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 16, 2019, 08:35:23 PM
The 2015 fractal that everyone loves to hate says we are on track.  

The next 3 months are an excellent time to dollar cost average in.  This should be our final round of consolidation at the “bottom” before we start the long slow climb over the next two years.

<img snip>

For the second time in one day...wishful thinking.
The old fractal is dead...long live the NEW fractal.

"You cannot step into the same river twice."

Heraclitus



996. Post 51848789 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: _javi_ on July 16, 2019, 09:38:32 PM
Did we had a senate hearing for Libra and the consequent shitshow in 2017?
I missed the US president tweets about BTC in 2015...

/ironic mode off



They already had similar hearings on bitcoin in September/October 2013.
Learned virtually nothing in those 6 years.
Yet btc is about 15X of the price.

2025 Senate hearings quote:

"Who is responsible for allowing bitcoin, which value is based on rarified Himalayan air (vacuum, zilch, nada) to reach into trillions of dollars?".

/s



997. Post 51860362 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Libra poisoned the well.

It would almost certainly destabilize currencies and even countries if/when let loose.
Example: a country has NIRP...Libra does not...so, you sell local currency and pocket the % (of NIRP) every year; or, you are in a non G-7 country...you sell local currency and buy Libra (a basket is almost always better than a single one). India and Russia-first two large countries to ban Libra on day one, I think.

Regarding libra and bitcoin-not sure how it would affect it, but i disagree about any optimism.
If I was one of bitcoin leaders or code contributors (and I am not), I would greatly accelerate Lightning wallets development.
On a positive side, some in Congress (and not in Senate) seem to understand the difference between something that is decentralized and centralized.




998. Post 51860620 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: gentlemand on July 17, 2019, 10:46:41 PM
Regarding libra and bitcoin-not sure how it would affect it, but i disagree about any optimism.

Libra has forced people to seek out and clarify their thinking in a hurry.

Most rational people once past 'drugs and terrorism' start to see some virtues.


Why it started with that, though? Rhetorical question.



999. Post 51861702 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

One panelist gets it:

https://youtu.be/9-ZTkCNW0w8?t=18948




1000. Post 51862005 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: rebal15 on July 18, 2019, 03:36:29 AM
Libra poisoned the well.

It would almost certainly destabilize currencies and even countries if/when let loose.
Example: a country has NIRP...Libra does not...so, you sell local currency and pocket the % (of NIRP) every year; or, you are in a non G-7 country...you sell local currency and buy Libra (a basket is almost always better than a single one). India and Russia-first two large countries to ban Libra on day one, I think.

Regarding libra and bitcoin-not sure how it would affect it, but i disagree about any optimism.
If I was one of bitcoin leaders or code contributors (and I am not), I would greatly accelerate Lightning wallets development.
On a positive side, some in Congress (and not in Senate) seem to understand the difference between something that is decentralized and centralized.


What do you mean with "bitcoin leaders"?

opinion leaders, what else, bud.



1001. Post 51862029 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: rebal15 on July 18, 2019, 03:49:03 AM
Libra poisoned the well.

It would almost certainly destabilize currencies and even countries if/when let loose.
Example: a country has NIRP...Libra does not...so, you sell local currency and pocket the % (of NIRP) every year; or, you are in a non G-7 country...you sell local currency and buy Libra (a basket is almost always better than a single one). India and Russia-first two large countries to ban Libra on day one, I think.

Regarding libra and bitcoin-not sure how it would affect it, but i disagree about any optimism.
If I was one of bitcoin leaders or code contributors (and I am not), I would greatly accelerate Lightning wallets development.
On a positive side, some in Congress (and not in Senate) seem to understand the difference between something that is decentralized and centralized.


What do you mean with "bitcoin leaders"?

opinion leaders, what else, bud.

You mean like political leaders.

no, the exact opposite...you are clearly not familiar with the term.



1002. Post 51862110 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: rebal15 on July 18, 2019, 03:52:39 AM
Libra poisoned the well.

It would almost certainly destabilize currencies and even countries if/when let loose.
Example: a country has NIRP...Libra does not...so, you sell local currency and pocket the % (of NIRP) every year; or, you are in a non G-7 country...you sell local currency and buy Libra (a basket is almost always better than a single one). India and Russia-first two large countries to ban Libra on day one, I think.

Regarding libra and bitcoin-not sure how it would affect it, but i disagree about any optimism.
If I was one of bitcoin leaders or code contributors (and I am not), I would greatly accelerate Lightning wallets development.
On a positive side, some in Congress (and not in Senate) seem to understand the difference between something that is decentralized and centralized.


What do you mean with "bitcoin leaders"?

opinion leaders, what else, bud.

You mean like political leaders.

no, the exact opposite

So, the anarchist leaders.

no, knowledge leaders, aka someone who knows math.



1003. Post 51862298 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: rebal15 on July 18, 2019, 04:42:16 AM
[ edited out]
Ok, so they are developers.

Lookie uie...

Trying to get Biodom to take your bait.

who gives any shits about what Biodom or any of us say about bitcoin thought leaders or opinion leaders...?


Bitcoin is ultimately a platform that has a multitude of networking effects, and growth with various aspects of the network have different people who are more influential than others, but it is a moving target of a whole hell of a lot of decentralization, driven by market motives, contribution to open source and sound money, and incentives to produce and/or compete to produce quality product without compromising basic principles of sound money, security, collaboration and the ability of others to build on prior work.

Some folks have more influence in various networks of bitcoin's space than others in terms of the kind of sense that they talk and their NOT getting distracted by shitcoin talk, scams, pump and dumbs or various other distracting talk, but in the end, there are no exact leaders.. to say,,, take me to your leader... you diptwat..

You seem to have been attempting to explode the context of Biodom's prior comment about leaders influencing bitcoin and to hook onto some bullshit in order to suggest that there is some kind of bitcoin leaders - even though some people might be influential in development and making proposals, but their proposals need to be accepted and adopted, to the extent that they come up with some good ideas and direction that they want to attempt to push, whether on bitcoin or lightning or anything that is tying into core aspects of bitcoin's way forward, you fuck.

Lets make things clear. It is not me who said Bitcoin leaders. You should quote who said it.

yeah, but it was already abundantly clear (just by looking at the context) to anyone without a preconceived agenda.
I digress..



1004. Post 51871871 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: Pamoldar on July 18, 2019, 08:22:38 PM
So this is what I see:

Today:  $10,610
1 October: $13,793 still working
1 November: $20,689.5 working
1 April 2020: $33,103.2 working
1 November 2020: $56,275.4 maybe
1 April 2021: $101,295.7 not working
1 November 2021: $192,462 recovering from a 100K party & traveling

Weeeeeeeeeeeeee

see my interpretation ^^^ above in red



1005. Post 51872481 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 18, 2019, 11:20:32 PM
So this is what I see:

Today:  $10,610
1 October: $13,793 still working
1 November: $20,689.5 working
1 April 2020: $33,103.2 working
1 November 2020: $56,275.4 maybe
1 April 2021: $101,295.7 not working
1 November 2021: $192,462 recovering from a 100K party & traveling

Weeeeeeeeeeeeee

see my interpretation ^^^ above in red

Your interpretation(s) has been lacking, recently.

You know that I am supposed to be trolling you for your having had mentioned on a few occasions, in recent times, the "waiting" for sub $9k BTC prices, don't you?

I am "waiting" for a sign from JSRAW regarding when this particular bottom is "in"... Maybe the two of you have been conspiring on the side, recently... hahahahahahaha... to fail/refuse to respond to trolling?  

For now, we are still in the downtrend with lower lows and lower local highs.
The downtrend is intact until we go back over 13.8K.
Second, the digs don't really work on me because I am already past the accumulation phase, at least according to my current investment plan.
Yes, I can buy here and there, but I would be distributing some btc each year, probably, feeding no-coiners.
Of course, if a small shitcoin play would work and some might do (at least temporarily), I would be converting those (in part or wholly) to btc. Bitcoin is the core position, but I do play small games on the periphery as it works better for me in comparison with scalping short term trades.



1006. Post 51881809 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on July 19, 2019, 07:45:16 PM
A bit harsh really



On a firm path to..."It’s got electrolytes. So it must be healthy, right?"



1007. Post 51891715 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: Phil_S on July 20, 2019, 05:07:17 PM
It's about time.




Apparently, a false alarm.

In other news, here is one of those periodic time-traveler takes on bitcoin (sounds like a movie scenario)...just for giggles:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/cfodub/bitcoin_likely_wasnt_supposed_to_come_out_until/

Finally, I am thinking of practicing niksen with regards to bitcoin observation:
https://time.com/5622094/what-is-niksen/



1008. Post 51902838 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

All flats on bitcoin graph are "fake" inasmuch as they always resolve in a drastic move up or down.

hot days of summer
wait a little and bitcoin
will move up and up



1009. Post 51904693 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on July 21, 2019, 07:58:55 PM
Bumped and get dumped in the last 24 hours.

Think of it like foreplay. We only get to stick our dicks in after the halving & that’s when the real fun starts.

unless it's a case of vagina dentata...lol



1010. Post 51905137 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on July 21, 2019, 08:42:35 PM
^^
First time we ride there Cheesy

And f*** what i’m worth compared with anybody else.....  i’m a guppie so why be bothered

And what I do have isn’t even whitin my reach Cheesy

someone said guppy...like in ...super guppy  Grin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdGTRjYrBi0

https://youtu.be/vRI5IpdrbH8?t=400



1011. Post 51907453 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

Quote from: Patel on July 22, 2019, 03:42:27 AM
Who knows...

But the one that thinks Bitcoin is the one and only and forever is a fool.

Something better will always come, time after time.

I understand this argument, even consider it myself from time to time, but it does not always work like this.

An example:
Life on earth is based on carbon. Could there be a better life, based, say, on Si? Maybe, but on this planet life appeared only once and remains the same in its basic setup. It will stay the same until it is gone (if it ever happens).

Unrelated example, really, just to show that better or even different not always come (is realistic time frames).
Better search than Google, bigger social than facebook-maybe, but not something foundational like language if we are coming closer to discussing bitcoin. We are not suddenly going to decide to use some minor language worldwide.

A bigger existing network can take over some functions, but at this point new crypto is unlikely to do it, I think.
That is with a caveat that I don't consider libra a cryptocurrency (as it is most similar to a currency ETF or a mutual fund).



1012. Post 51917982 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

JS...

If you double or triple posted by accident, be nice and clean up afterwards (preferably not the next day).
Thanks.

Quote from: _javi_ on July 22, 2019, 09:15:37 PM
I have to pay bills, and i prefer to sell one kidney..

Many friends are asking on how to buy again.. even those burnt on 2017.

I hope that you are kidding as it definetly NOT worth it.
Health comes first, or maybe second after loved ones.



1013. Post 51929585 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

I usually do buys/sells by following the trend, not by some arbitrarily chosen number.
in a long run, though, all buys in btc below, say, 50K are going to be either spectacularly good or account zeroing ones.
The difference lies only in numbers of btc bought.
Personally, I am not buying here.




1014. Post 51936527 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

A beginner's guide to recognizing and changing negative thoughts:

https://www.inc.com/amy-morin/a-simple-but-effective-mental-strength-exercise-designed-for-kids-that-works-great-for-adults-too.html



1015. Post 51939881 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

My question to those who predict 100K within less than two years or so.
Why the discounting mechanism is not working?

If it is highly likely that 100K would be there by 2021, we should have mad buying of btc and its options right now.
That's my biggest beef with the S/F models.
Either the model is wrong/irrelevant OR the market is incapable of correctly pricing future expectations now.



1016. Post 51942319 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

This was not discussed here, but yesterday btc miners (new gen, another batch) went on sale for ridiculously high prices.
Sold out very quickly, regardless.
The only way these purchases make any sense is the expectation of price doubling to quadrupling within 12 mo when taking into account both the difficulty and the price rise.



1017. Post 51942537 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.56h):

One ... may ask more questions than seven wise men can answer.



1018. Post 51963410 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

UK sold their gold at $250  Roll Eyes
It basically tells you that almost no government knows anything about markets.
Maybe, Swiss gov does.

Are we going to come out of the weekend at $9500 or $10100?



1019. Post 51974183 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: jojo69 on July 27, 2019, 10:04:29 PM
Its OK in Holland.

and that kid is like Mum what the fuck?

lol




I live in Holland and this is not OK

I don't know WTF is up with the old cow opening her bathrobe...gross...

but those pussy sculptures, pretty sure I saw those in Stockholm in 1985...meh

A couple of points:

1. Not sure what knowledge they supposed to get from looking at sculptures? Sculpures have maybe 1% of the relevant information.
2. Why show kids sculptures when they already saw it all on the interwebs.



1020. Post 51975950 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

citadeles, citadels...

Bond market is going into a black hole:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-13/the-black-hole-engulfing-the-world-s-bond-markets-quicktake

What is the end game there?

Difficult to understand/comprehend Max Keizer commented on above by saying that stocks would be "finished" somehow and we would split into 2+98 with 2% living in "citadels":
https://youtu.be/u3ojPk8CQns?t=390

Plus,here is Walter Isaacson telling us that we are about to split into subspecies and it would be difficult to impossible to stop it:
https://airmail.news/issues/2019-7-27/should-the-rich-be-allowed-to-buy-the-best-genes

I feel that all this somehow connects to recent PR moves regarding bitcoin as in "not everyone should be able to get in".




1021. Post 51984138 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

An interesting opinion:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ktorpey/2019/07/26/3-reasons-president-trump-is-great-for-the-bitcoin-price/



1022. Post 51984327 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: Pamoldar on July 28, 2019, 04:08:32 PM
3 Reasons President Trump Is Great For The Bitcoin Price
Trump is great to talk BS
Bitcoin does not give a f**k duck about him

You don't think that directly telling Fed to devalue is bullish for bitcoin?
Apparently, you did not even read an article before responding.
Being bullish or bearish is not a critique or endorsement of the causing entity, just an interpretation of such entity actions as far as direction is concerned.




1023. Post 51984796 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: jojo69 on July 28, 2019, 04:20:19 PM

tldr; Bitcoin price doesn't just magically rise on its own.  /rant

You quite sure about that Torque?

I mean, I get your point, but golly if it doesn't seem like it sometimes.

Or, maybe, bitcoin is moving toward some kind of it's future "Omega point" (de Chardin).
The path could vary/deviate, but the end result is, perhaps, largely inevitable.
Sometimes, I think that this is the case, while other times the whole situation looks fragile.



1024. Post 51986430 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 28, 2019, 06:51:46 PM
citadeles, citadels...

Bond market is going into a black hole:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-13/the-black-hole-engulfing-the-world-s-bond-markets-quicktake

What is the end game there?

Difficult to understand/comprehend Max Keizer commented on above by saying that stocks would be "finished" somehow and we would split into 2+98 with 2% living in "citadels":
https://youtu.be/u3ojPk8CQns?t=390

Plus,here is Walter Isaacson telling us that we are about to split into subspecies and it would be difficult to impossible to stop it:
https://airmail.news/issues/2019-7-27/should-the-rich-be-allowed-to-buy-the-best-genes

I feel that all this somehow connects to recent PR moves regarding bitcoin as in "not everyone should be able to get in".

Surely everyone can get into bitcoin, it is just a matter of how much they are able to acquire and at what price and how many of them are going to end up chasing the train, or rocket or whatever combination of vehicles we embark upon in our journey from here to there.

if you curse it enough, many would not want to until it is a too late, at least for appreciation, leaving more for those in the know (or those who have more money).



1025. Post 51999447 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Take part in designing the "satoshi" symbol..it's fun, actually:

https://cryptoslate.com/the-satoshi-the-smallest-unit-of-bitcoin-is-getting-its-own-symbol/



1026. Post 51999711 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: jojo69 on July 29, 2019, 11:46:32 PM
IMO iLOVEbitcointalkBECAUSEitMAKESmeHAPPY is a strong password and can not be cracked easily with a $200 PC. But I would add at least one number and a special character.

that's what I was thinking, it passes the "correct horse battery staple" test

edit/   ahhh yes, I see this is most adequately covered above, good job guys

I dunno, the above example sound pretty much like a 'brain wallet' that turned out to be very hackable.

It reminds me of a strange coincidence few years ago when in Megamillions (one of two US lotteries) four out of six numbers were those also depicted in a recently screened show "Lost". The end result was that more than 41K people won (much, much higher than expected).

They thought at first that someone hacked the lottery. A funny thing: if just one more number (a fifth one) would be chosen out of the "Lost" numbers, then the lottery would have gone bankrupt as they promised to pay 250K to EVERYONE who wins five numbers (out of six).
250KX41K=$10 billion. EOL.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/hurleys-lost-numbers-win-fans-mega-millions-lottery-money_n_804723



1027. Post 52010539 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Perhaps I am wrong, but I don't think that there will be a significant price appreciation speculation in bitcoin after $50-100K.

To me it looks like this:

Bitcoin price: participants

Below $100: Very early adopters, miners.

Between $100-1000: The first wave of fomo, speculators, savers, accumulators, storage of value, super early hedge funds (I am aware of just one).

Between $150-20000: Early hedge funds, hodlers from the first wave, miners, new buyers (fomoing in) which then sell for alts and eventually getting rekt

Current cycle $3100 to maybe $50K: Hodlers from the prior wave DCAing, few new buyers, more hedge funds, family offices, innovative endowments

Above 50K until 100-300K: Almost exclusively hedge funds and other institutionals. Regular people start to use it as a currency instead of trying to speculate.

Above 100K: Very large funds and hedgefunds, maybe country size funds (Norway, Oman sovereign Fund, Abu Dhabi, etc)

Above 300k: Central banks and governments.

I cannot possibly envision some individual investor speculating that btc will go from 10 tril (~0.5mil/btc) to 15 tril (0.75mil/btc).

TL;DR Soon enough (see numbers) the speculation by individuals will stop and it would be used as a currency/long term SOV.



1028. Post 52019230 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: Saint-loup on July 31, 2019, 05:01:16 PM
The SEC will start to mine some btc soon...   Grin

The SEC Set To Begin Running Bitcoin and Ethereum Nodes

The US Securities and Exchange Commission is looking for quotes from contractors who will run the Ethereum and Bitcoin nodes for them.

What is the motivation behind the move?

Moving forward, the contractors will have to make additions of new blockchains as the SEC requires. The SEC has, however, not given any valid reason as to why it wants to operate its own nodes. The only explanation the agency has provided is stating that the objective is to support monitoring risk, compliance enhancement as well as to inform SEC policymaking on digital assets.

The SEC will ramp up its analytics to aid its blockchain complaisance investigations and monitoring. In essence, they have stated that the subscription will collect blockchain data from the various hosted nodes instead of offering the data through blockchain explorers.

https://cryptoiq.co/the-sec-set-to-begin-running-bitcoin-and-ethereum-nodes/

They will spam everyone who makes decent size txs; remember that 1-100 sat spam few years ago.
That was also "monitoring", I guess.



1029. Post 52031495 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Rate cut had little effect, but the announcement of new tariffs on China most certainly did.
I don't particularly like the fact that we are now correlating with gold, though.

Overall, we should have been at $1tril already.
Not sure why most financial managers are asleep at the wheel on this.
As Pomp says: "Get off zero".



1030. Post 52032473 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 01, 2019, 11:23:04 PM
Hash rate follows price.  


Only in a very general sense and based on just 2-3 examples so far.
In 2011 bear hash rate declined (at the very end).
In 2014-2015 hash rate flattened, not really declined.
In 2018, hashrate declined (at the very end).

In all three cases observing flattening and/or declining hashrate and THEN buying based on this alone would be very profitable almost immediately following the decline/flatlining of the hash rate.

What Woo is saying: hashrate declining and flatlining is a good btc buy indicator.
What you (HM) are saying is essentially this: hashrate is not an indicator aka price decline itself is a bullish indicator.
Maybe it is correct too, in the final analysis.

Someone posted before that, paradoxically, when btc drops below one of the long term averages (I forgot which one, could be 200d or 50wk), then, historically, it is bullish and not bearish indicator while in stocks it is mostly a bearish indicator.




1031. Post 52033003 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Last time we went from roughly $1K to $20k.
I would say that $50K is a minimal expectation IF the cycles continue the up down pattern, which is always an unknown.
I would not be surprised by $200K, but would not plan for it as far as seriously laying out what to do if and when.



1032. Post 52033702 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 02, 2019, 02:53:48 AM
What I believe is we are experiencing a bull trap.The ''new'' money is lacking.The china-usa trade war issue is somehow positive for BTC and interest rate cut may draw interest of some big multi million whales to crypto investment however taxation and risk aversion will keep the actions as reactions and bull traps.

Is that your face-saving alias account: jonoiv?  Biodom?  Amateur? Lambie?


nope.

Plus, I am getting progressively bored with the price action here.
Starting to seek some excitement on the stock market.
It's going to get wild toward the fall, I think.

Quote from: Searing on August 02, 2019, 03:06:44 AM
We should see a dump in some BTC difficulty soon.

If/when it does, I'd 'guess' you will see a drop of 20% or some such.


IMHO, it is not going to happen since Bitmain is selling anything they can lay their hands on.



1033. Post 52033878 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 02, 2019, 04:53:34 AM
What I believe is we are experiencing a bull trap.The ''new'' money is lacking.The china-usa trade war issue is somehow positive for BTC and interest rate cut may draw interest of some big multi million whales to crypto investment however taxation and risk aversion will keep the actions as reactions and bull traps.

Is that your face-saving alias account: jonoiv?  Biodom?  Amateur? Lambie?


nope.

Plus, I am getting progressively bored with the price action here.
Starting to seek some excitement on the stock market.
It's going to get wild toward the fall, I think.


Regarding your stock market comment, you seem distracted.  Stock markets should not be anywhere near to as exciting as bitcoin.  Who gives any shits about 10% moves in the stock market when we may be getting 40% on the downside in bitcoin and also 5x or more (even though we have only had 3.5x so far in recent times)... anyhow, 3.5x moves in bitcoin should be way the fuck more exciting than 10% stock market moves.... AmiNOTrite?

Furthermore, I used to have a real decent portion of my investments in various stock market index funds, etc etc.. but now those funds are a fraction of my bitcoin funds  They do not perform even close to as dramatically as my bitcoin funds... Maybe the get 30% from time to time, but fuck 30% is almost nothing in bitcoin, even though 30% really excites me, but jesus fucking christ, you must have been excited in the end of June when we were approaching the top of more than 3.5x in less than 3 months.. that is something to be WOWed about, no?

You don't have to play the whole stock market, and to increase leverage, you can use puts/calls.
Bitcoin itself trades more like an option (on a new financial system, I guess).

In btc right now is a bit too many unknown unknowns to simply stack satoshis, IMHO, but if it goes parabolic right here, I would be among those who simply rejoice.



1034. Post 52041707 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on August 02, 2019, 08:31:19 PM

You must be joking.

>$1m net worth is upper lower lower middle class.

>$10m net worth is upper upper lower middle class.

>$20m net worth is lower lower upper middle class.

>$50m net worth is lower lower upper class.

>$100m net worth is upper upper class.

>$1000m net worth is upper upper upper class.



Sorry to barge in, but it is not a valid classification, afaik.
Here is a much better one:

https://www.accountingweb.com/practice/clients/understanding-the-five-categories-of-wealth

Bitcoin OGs are "High Asset, Low Cash Flow" Wealth.
Many/some of them are probably "Under the Radar" category.

Upon btc reaching 100K OGs would probably seek to transition from "High Asset, Low Cash Flow" to "High Asset, High Cash Flow".
Maybe this is when staking coins would surge, or, maybe, this is when OGs would start buying apartments en masse.

Another classification: $1-3 mil affluent; $3-10mil wealthy; above $10mil-rich.
In US in a larger, but not most expensive city, you have to have $3mil minimally to maintain a middle class lifestyle while not working. i guess you can call such person as wealthy enough not to worry about earning a living. Not really rich, though. Ronaldo earns 800K with one instagram endorsement post. Shaq earns 60mil/year by doing commercials. That's a high cash flow, lol.



1035. Post 52041887 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on August 02, 2019, 09:15:29 PM

In US in a larger, but not most expensive city, you have to have $3mil minimally to maintain a middle class lifestyle while not working.

I heard that in posh areas of San Fransisco you would be lucky to get this for £1m.

image clipped

Not in Sanfran, but those are (900K-1mil, small, but OK to live in):
https://www.zillow.com/san-francisco-ca/?searchQueryState={%22pagination%22:{},%22mapBounds%22:{%22west%22:-122.5751212973633,%22east%22:-122.29153670263673,%22south%22:37.63662788292032,%22north%22:37.9136954367416},%22usersSearchTerm%22:%22san%20francisco%22,%22regionSelection%22:[{%22regionId%22:20330,%22regionType%22:6}],%22isMapVisible%22:true,%22mapZoom%22:12,%22filterState%22:{%22price%22:{%22min%22:900000,%22max%22:1000000},%22monthlyPayment%22:{%22min%22:3308,%22max%22:3675}},%22isListVisible%22:true}



1036. Post 52041929 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on August 02, 2019, 09:28:53 PM

You must be joking.

>$1m net worth is upper lower lower middle class.

>$10m net worth is upper upper lower middle class.

>$20m net worth is lower lower upper middle class.

>$50m net worth is lower lower upper class.

>$100m net worth is upper upper class.

>$1000m net worth is upper upper upper class.



Sorry to barge in, but it is not a valid classification, afaik.
Here is a much better one:

https://www.accountingweb.com/practice/clients/understanding-the-five-categories-of-wealth



That's not valid. Here's a much better classification based on Homer Simpson's description of his family as "upper lower middle class" and Lisa's description of her family as "upper lower lower middle class".

https://www.vox.com/2016/9/6/12752476/the-simpsons-homer-middle-class

Ah, got it. Solid.



1037. Post 52041942 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on August 02, 2019, 09:36:48 PM

In US in a larger, but not most expensive city, you have to have $3mil minimally to maintain a middle class lifestyle while not working.

I heard that in posh areas of San Fransisco you would be lucky to get this for £1m.

image clipped

Not in Sanfran, but those are (900K-1mil, small, but OK to live in):
https://www.zillow.com/san-francisco-ca/?searchQueryState={%22pagination%22:{},%22mapBounds%22:{%22west%22:-122.5751212973633,%22east%22:-122.29153670263673,%22south%22:37.63662788292032,%22north%22:37.9136954367416},%22usersSearchTerm%22:%22san%20francisco%22,%22regionSelection%22:[{%22regionId%22:20330,%22regionType%22:6}],%22isMapVisible%22:true,%22mapZoom%22:12,%22filterState%22:{%22price%22:{%22min%22:900000,%22max%22:1000000},%22monthlyPayment%22:{%22min%22:3308,%22max%22:3675}},%22isListVisible%22:true}

But it's a picture of a brick toilet (shithouse). Who wants to live in a brick shithouse?

I dunno, Eric Cartman, perhaps.
Or, he will rent it out at $10K/mo as a 'cozy, but nice place for deep thinkers'.



1038. Post 52042157 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: lightfoot on August 02, 2019, 10:03:45 PM

Any product that can move two tons of mass at 70mph for 200 miles is going to react poorly to being shot by a high power firearm. And mistakes happen all the time with regular cars, we have simply learned to accept and balance the risk.

As for autopilot, just like in a plane the pilot has final responsibility for the aircraft. The driver has final responsibility for the car. Power steering and power brakes make the job easier but if you can't stop the car without either you should not be driving. Same with autopilot.

That tesla driver's family should pay for the damage to the truck and the cost of mopping up the blood.

Tesla advertises their system as FSD (full self driving), which to me is BS.
They paid up for almost identical 2016 incident and will pay up for this one as well.
For me: I decided to stay away from Tesla. Too little car for too much moola. I was never interested in FSD.



1039. Post 52042499 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 02, 2019, 11:01:35 PM

Tesla advertises their system as FSD (full self driving), which to me is BS.
They paid up for almost identical 2016 incident and will pay up for this one as well.
For me: I decided to stay away from Tesla. Too little car for too much moola. I was never interested in FSD.

It’s not full self driving - you have to keep your hands on the wheel

I am driving 1,200 miles over the next two days. I would like autopilot.  

Be safe...

FSD is their terminology, not mine:
https://www.tesla.com/model3/design#autopilot

Quote
Starting today, Tesla is splitting Autopilot into two packages: regular Autopilot, with automatic steering on highways and traffic-aware cruise control; and Full Self-Driving Capability, with Tesla’s recently unveiled “Navigate on Autopilot” feature that guides the car from “on-ramp to off-ramp” by suggesting and making lane changes, navigating highway interchanges, and proactively taking exits.

https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/28/18245370/tesla-autopilot-full-self-driving-musk-2019

it's just marketing lingo. Most people get it, but they should not have been able to use this language.
I would suggest that several times out of a 100 Tesla would go under a truck IF that truck has a picture of a 'sky with clouds' or a picture of a high bridge on the truck's side.

To add something related to btc:

If btc will rise another 20-100X, this article might show where bitcoiners will get their cash without necessarily selling:
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2019-07-31/art-secured-loans

With bitcoin at $1 mil, it would probably be quite safe to borrow against it at, say, 30K/btc. Loan secured by btc (treating btc almost as a collectible).
That, and maybe lending part of OGs stash out will become standard. The second path is more risky, but more lucrative for the cash flow.



1040. Post 52048798 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

In other news:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-02/germany-s-whole-yield-curve-dives-below-0-for-the-first-time

What can savers do?
They should consider some allocation to bitcoin (1-5% for starters).



1041. Post 52052155 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: jbreher on August 03, 2019, 10:28:18 PM
Yeah, I much prefer incremental steps. I’m not in the mood for unsustainable pumps because we all know what happens after them.

I love unsustainable pumps. Make $ on the way up, corn on the way down. Yummy.

nobody can do it on sustainable basis as it does not tell you where it will go.
sooner or later, you would lose.



1042. Post 52060994 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 04, 2019, 05:21:27 PM
I hope that the world does not deteriorate further in that direction... though I do agree with you regarding the likely transfer or wealth from nocoiners to coiners, so in that regard, it is not too late to join the world of coiners if you happen to not be one, yet.  Surely there is some benefits to getting into BTC earlier.   Is there a saying about when is the best time to get into bitcoin?  yesterday.  When is the second best time to get into bitcoin?  today.  

I think that there are at least a few more 10x price runs (maybe even up to 5) before the wealth transfer from no coiners to coiners has largely and mostly taken place.

Many of us who are mostly not easily shaken from our coins will be decently rich, maybe even approaching "filthy" level with one or two more 10x price surges.  One 10x surge puts prices at $100k and 2 10x surges puts prices at $1million.  Most others participating in this thread with lower BTC holdings should be able to achieve such status by the time three 10x price surges occur.. that would be $10million a coin, so in those circumstances, even .5 BTC would be decent, but a whole coin would be even better... and you guys holding 5 or more coins will be sitting pretty... problem is that $10million per coin seems a bit of a stretch of the imagination, even if it is after 2028 or so?  there are quite a few participants in this thread that have at least until 2028 to stack their sats, no?

To me current probabilities look like this:

Within 3 years (2022), I estimate the probability of $100K at 50%

If 100K is achieved on schedule, $1mil probability in 2026 might be 20-30%

It is also possible that $300-400K (roughly a marketcap of gold) would be a longer term maximum for a decade or a bit longer.

TL;DR 10X surges will not continue for multiple cycles, maybe only 1-2 such cycles left.




1043. Post 52064168 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.57h):

Quote from: jbreher on August 04, 2019, 11:38:09 PM
Yeah, I much prefer incremental steps. I’m not in the mood for unsustainable pumps because we all know what happens after them.

I love unsustainable pumps. Make $ on the way up, corn on the way down. Yummy.

nobody can do it on sustainable basis as it does not tell you where it will go.
sooner or later, you would lose.

For some value of 'lose' that has nothing to do with my personal situation.

Can you elaborate, jbreher?  

Yeah. My elaboration is I don't believe that there is any way in which this strategy would cause me to "lose" - counter to biodom's claim.

Every up/down, I make a profit. I can choose whether to take that profit in USD or BTC. Sometimes I flip from one to the other, depending upon cash flow needs.

It is true that this causes me to sell at a price that I expect to be (wildly) exceeded in the future. Accordingly, if corn price goes up monotonically, I will eventually have no corn, and nothing but a gigantic pile o' stinky fiat. Is that 'losing'? Not exactly. Kinda.

However, that pile of stinky fiat is rather stratospheric, given the ratios of play_money:stake I am laddering.

And every up/down gives me a more corn (if I don't take the profit in USD). Accordingly, depending upon the amount of volatility in relation to upward trend, I may never run out on the high side. Losing? Hardly.

So in reality, I was merely trying to soften a retort of 'bullshit' to biodom's blanket 'lose' statement.

The only point i was making is that selling, then re-buying, then selling again and re-buying sequences would most likely (in my opinion) result in a lower number of bitcoins than you start with.

I have absolutely no problem with selling bitcoin (or $$ for btc) in bits and pieces on the way up (or down, depending on your strategy).
It' the trading back and forth that I posit to be an unrealistic tool (when taken alone) to increase the number of btc that someone have.

I realize that you might be playing with small %%, still, i do not wish other people trading away their future wealth by trying to gain a bit of a leverage, hence my post.



1044. Post 52084735 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: lightfoot on August 07, 2019, 12:41:48 AM
I wonder: Would a Trezor survive liquid nitrogen?

Reason I'm asking is I think I might get my head frozen after all when I die. Tattoo "I have bitcoins", include a couple of Trezors in my mouth with a good PIN, and in a thousand years when Bitcoin is worth infinite amounts it would be a reasonable reward to dethaw my brain and put me on a top of line body.

Hm....

Half-jokingly...USB connector tech has to survive too, which is not likely.
Maybe you can use a microscope to get the info, though.
Here is something regarding 11th century (and nearby) tech.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_technology
Well, interestingly enough, wheelbarrow was invented back then (in 12th century).



1045. Post 52094679 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 07, 2019, 08:40:47 PM

Dude. 16th Amendment, followed by the Revenue Act of 1913?

I googled that in less than 10 seconds.

Edit:  here is the text of the 16th Amendment

Quote
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

I agree with you on income, but that law/amendment does not say anything about capital gains.



1046. Post 52096655 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: jojo69 on August 08, 2019, 05:49:34 AM

Quote
[Bitcoin] trades like a call option on a new [monetary] system

hmmmmm

Well, sounds familiar...
Of course...I said exactly (almost) the same on Aug 2 (5 days earlier) on this very forum, lol:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg52033878#msg52033878

Quote
Bitcoin itself trades more like an option (on a new financial system, I guess).

But, of course, on the internet ideas disseminate quickly and no one ever quotes anyone. Oh, well.





1047. Post 52133611 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

For those who are curious about btc mining history (with future predictions):

https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-mining-industrys-exponential-growth-just-wont-stop/

alts are turning up
bitcoin is briefly asleep
this would flip again



1048. Post 52136096 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: jojo69 on August 12, 2019, 03:16:43 AM

Just wanted to note the stupidity....
I do get your point.

that is fucking it

I am ignoring anyone who quotes him for the next week.

I don't care who you are.

Sadly, nobody would notice, except yourself.

I found it a little strange that the person who argued against 'something' gets the most talking sternly to, and not the one that wrote that very 'something'.
It's a bit skewed.

Ignore me too: I think that bitcoin is super boring right now.
There is basically NOTHING to talk about, apart from small price gyrations.
The best talk in town is planB, but even this got a bit tedious lately. Current "news" is that his writings are being translated to yet another language.
Give me fire or give me ice. Being range-bound is the worst scenario.



1049. Post 52140553 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: nutildah on August 12, 2019, 08:08:41 AM
I wonder what they should change the "Save" icon to...

True, floppy disks are just completely irrelevant.

Can't change it to a CD because they are nearing irrelevance.

The "Save" icon is iconic, but antiquated.

What would be a decent replacement?

Macs don't even have "Save as" in the current system.
It was replaced by "Duplicate", which was a dumb move from my perspective.
This means that you have to first duplicate it, then rename.



1050. Post 52140824 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: Paashaas on August 12, 2019, 02:19:18 PM
New Zealand Tax Office Makes It Legal to Pay Salaries in Crypto


..and it would be a completely retarded way in US because here you are suspected of not paying taxes when you transfer bitcoin from one wallet to another (according to recent stories in the media).



1051. Post 52144136 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: Dabs on August 12, 2019, 10:04:47 PM
You could always consolidate all the dust into new addresses. Then from that new address, hop it a couple of times to different new addresses. Then run them through some large mixer, like CoinJoin or similar.



Yes ... you can. Or maybe, you can't. But I can.

watch out...'rules' patrol.

bitcoin still sleeping.
soon, WO would be in the ice age.



1052. Post 52146088 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: Leon83 on August 13, 2019, 05:27:37 AM
Seems like Bitcoin has become a stablecoin at around $11,400 haha  Grin

Market participants became so infatuated with the S/F model that they now "restricted" btc to a "flat" predicted by the current S/F value.
That would be excellent as it would also predict a vertical upward move from 10-12K to 50-55K somewhere in May of 2020.
Using mild leverage then and there should increase the profit even more.

Well, I revealed my future trading plan somehow... /s



1053. Post 52150874 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on August 13, 2019, 02:38:34 PM
don’t sell a single sat because 2021/22 = MOON.

Simon says: maybe, 2020...that would be something.



1054. Post 52153967 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

If there is no trust with actual 1.1mil btc and by actual I mean btc for which the trust has private keys for, then it is even more idiotic than i thought.
Let's toast to this!



1055. Post 52162737 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

the DOW went down 800 points  Shocked

We are suddenly correlating, which is a bummer, but could be attributed to Coinbase/Barclays conundrum.





1056. Post 52163473 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

HM, it looks like short term massive decline in bond's yield is cratering the stock market which, in turn, is affecting btc (negatively).
Gold/silver are outperforming, but probably not for too long (short term).
SP500 at 2150-2350 by October? BTW, SP500 is now marginally negative on a 1 year chart.

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/SPX/EsLWA86X-SPX-Top-Date-Coming-2-Sentiment-Low-Free-Market-Timing-Video/

TL;DR If SP500 crashes, bitcoin will go down with it. Then, hopefully, a re-bounce.



1057. Post 52163992 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

4 digits on stamp and pro.   Sad



1058. Post 52164683 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: lightfoot on August 15, 2019, 02:10:05 AM
I remember watching the stock market implode in 2008 and watching the value of my gold holdings collapse just as fast.

Some cash is nice, but even that's turning into crap, and slaves just don't cut it anymore....

The picture was more complex:
1. First, gold rallied 30% from October 2007 to Bear demise (3/2008) while SP500 declined 13%.
2. Then, between Bear and Lehman (or its immediate aftermath), gold declined 35% (from peak) and SP500 declined another 28% (for a total of 41% at the indicated time).
3. Therefore, counting from October 2007, gold was down only 5%, but SP500 was down 41%.
4. From that point, until July 2011, Gold rallied 140% while SP500 only 36%.

Perhaps, you only noticed the period between Bear and Lehman.

A very similar situation is occuring now: gold is rallying, SP500 stalling and declining.

Prediction: If we are going into a serious decline, gold might rally for, maybe, another 10% and then will get smashed with everything else.

TL;DR My take is that IF stock market would decline sharply, then btc would get dragged down as well, at least initially.



1059. Post 52170337 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Accusations against GE:
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/15/heres-the-full-report-calling-ge-a-bigger-fraud-than-enron.html

Wow, it used to be such an icon until about 2000.



1060. Post 52171014 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: bkbirge on August 15, 2019, 06:04:30 PM

Here is a good article explaining the protests:  https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/13/what-do-the-hong-kong-protesters-want

I remember the fall of the Soviet Union.  

It is possible that Hong Kong will be the spark that tips over the Chinese Communist Party. Especially if the protests spread to Taiwan and Macau. 

China is not in the same situation as Soviet Russia was economically or politically based on my very cursory and casual reading of the news, I'd be very surprised if China doesn't get a handle on this. I'll go read that article, thanks for sharing.

How do you know in what situation they are?
Getting handle on this?
I am surprised that US is not supporting Hk all the way.
What happened to pro-democracy stance?



1061. Post 52171905 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

I guess bitcoin is not inviting alts to the party.
1 Like.



1062. Post 52172652 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

"I fight for the users"...

Anyway, were we over or under 10300 at that "magical" time frame?



1063. Post 52172725 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.58h):

Quote from: jojo69 on August 16, 2019, 12:14:01 AM
If the journalists are told to leave Hong Kong....




The challenge for the CCP is everyone is a journalist nowadays...

That is an illusion.  There are a finite number of fiber optic trunklines and uplink radios out of the island.  Nobody does HF radio any more, so no, civilians have the illusion of being connected when all they are connected to is a centralized system.

Good point.  Just shut down the cell towers.  

And it's not like you have to go around to each one.  There is a facility for each provider called the NOC; Network Operations Center.

The crackdown will not be televised.

I am throwing up in my mouth a little after reading all these theoretical suggestions on how to suppress dissent.



1064. Post 52179127 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on August 16, 2019, 09:29:15 AM
Bad news.

After yesterday's green everything is awesome candle, we got the red candle again, at least for now. Looks like it is going to test that 9.2-9.3k.


I'll buy some serious amounts if this goes below $8k. and I don't mean small potatoes like $100.

Any post starting with "bad news" smells like FUD to me. Recently both mindrust and lambie are posting their predictions based on nothing (I recall a better expression, but I don't want to be rude because I really liked these guys at first). It looks like they are trying to influence the others with their repetetive 4900 resp. 7000-8000 claims. Guys, you are very new to the Bitcoin world. The market punished you for 6 months, now you are hoping to catch back what was missed. It is better to be honest and not lie to us. Learn your lessons, invest regularly and don't try to cheat the market, it will bite you. Leave the trade and FUD trolling to the pro's.  Don't go to the dark side!  Grin

By the end of 2014 I had sold all other investments and after setting aside a large chunk for cap gains taxes I was 100 percent in Bitcoin.


Cool story and time-wise very similar to mine, albeit I did not liquidate all fiat: left retirement portfolio intact (mainly due to penalties), but decreased my regular brokerage accounts 80% (at the time) since I did not want to borrow money.
You have to sell fiat to buy corn, right?
I don't think poorly of short term (or even long term) bears as long as their opinion is rational, like yours.
Hopefully, long term is up, but fluctuations are to be expected.
Stock market, on the other hand, is behaving in bipolar fashion.
I am mostly out into short term bonds (before the rate cut as I was expecting a plunge) since I can handle just one asset class with super high volatility, not two or three.



1065. Post 52179753 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on August 16, 2019, 05:59:01 PM


At first I would be happy that I can do a search.
This alone would be indicative of so much that everything else might be secondary.
Albeit, I doubt that current interfaces would be in vogue (laptop or cell phone).

you are leading to bitcoin, right?
Nope, my first search would be about family.



1066. Post 52179842 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

In other news...

Someone suggests shorting HK banks as a token of support for protestors:

https://realmoney.thestreet.com/investing/hong-kong-protesters-try-to-start-a-run-on-the-banks-and-the-currency-15059445

Quote
Should the go-for-the-cash strategy catch on, however, it could morph into something more significant.

yet

Quote
In fact, many ATMs have run out of cash. Media reports suggest around half are not now in service, while some bank branches ran out of U.S. dollars to issue. Any chance of a sustained run on the banks looks very limited, for now, since this was a relatively small group of netizens who organized the effort.



1067. Post 52180304 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on August 16, 2019, 07:23:37 PM
Guys, I've decided to give my alter ego, r0ach, a vacation. I'll be posting with this account for a while.

Just glad to see you post again Cheesy

Oh shit mic, I just remembered your BAKKT game. They are confirmed as commencing trading 23rd September. Your BAKKT thread will finally have a winner soon Cheesy

I thought you were safe there & would never have to pay anybody out as I didn’t think they’d ever get the approvals/license.

Edit - I found the thread. You said the 17th day AFTER they open -

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5083242.0

eatonabooger (yew!) is currently winning



1068. Post 52180330 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 16, 2019, 07:28:20 PM
shows how god-damned difficult it would be to get anywhere close to 800 BTC ever again for a person with such a seemingly average budget.

Most likely, impossible.
After all, 800btc is btc of approximately 282 thousand average earthlings (at full emission).



1069. Post 52180776 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: jbreher on August 16, 2019, 08:21:58 PM
You seem to be describing Armageddon-like scenarios in which gold might prosper in such a way that is appreciating 10x or more from current value, ... unlikely scenarios, but we might chose to make 1% to 10% of our investment choices based on such scenarios, especially if we assign them a high probability (such as 10%, which seems a bit high to me, but might seem reasonable to some of the Armageddon nutjobs out there)

Q: Given an unending supply of inflationary medium, how long can a balloon keep expanding?

A: Exactly until the internal inflationary forces overcome structural integrity, causing balloon to burst.

- jbreher, proud monetary armageddonist nutjob since long before the turn of the millennia


Noted:  Jbreher admits to being one of the armagaeddon nutjobs.  Hopefully, you, jbreher, are not staking too much of actual value (more  than 10% - or even up to 20% in really seemingly stupid-ass crazy dedication)  on such an unlikely scenario.
I don't know when, but I'm 99% certain there will be a grand worldwide monetary reset within my lifetime. Perhaps as early as next week.
I might subscribe to this, but the question is what form it would take.
Imagine for a moment that ALL bonds in developed countries (or at least up to 30 year) are with negative yield (like in Germany right now).
What would it mean?
To me, it would almost certainly mean that you would be charged for deposits. In a big picture this would look like system malfunction.
El-Erian recently said that fin system is not set up to operate with negative yields. Think of insurance and pension funds, for example.
In this situation, who would have deposits larger than a month or two of expenses?
As far as reset itself is concerned, the question is how it might happen and would it affect those pernicious negative rates?




1070. Post 52180987 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: jbreher on August 16, 2019, 08:45:12 PM
You seem to be describing Armageddon-like scenarios in which gold might prosper in such a way that is appreciating 10x or more from current value, ... unlikely scenarios, but we might chose to make 1% to 10% of our investment choices based on such scenarios, especially if we assign them a high probability (such as 10%, which seems a bit high to me, but might seem reasonable to some of the Armageddon nutjobs out there)

Q: Given an unending supply of inflationary medium, how long can a balloon keep expanding?

A: Exactly until the internal inflationary forces overcome structural integrity, causing balloon to burst.

- jbreher, proud monetary armageddonist nutjob since long before the turn of the millennia


Noted:  Jbreher admits to being one of the armagaeddon nutjobs.  Hopefully, you, jbreher, are not staking too much of actual value (more  than 10% - or even up to 20% in really seemingly stupid-ass crazy dedication)  on such an unlikely scenario.
I don't know when, but I'm 99% certain there will be a grand worldwide monetary reset within my lifetime. Perhaps as early as next week.
I might subscribe to this, but the question is what form it would take.
Imagine for a moment that ALL bonds in developed countries (or at least up to 30 year) are with negative yield (like in Germany right now).
What would it mean?
To me, it would almost certainly mean that you would be charged for deposits. In a big picture this would look like system malfunction.
El-Erian recently said that fin system is not set up to operate with negative yields. Think of insurance and pension funds, for example.
In this situation, who would have deposits larger than a month or two of expenses?
Reset where and how would reset affect those negative rates?

I don't think that the CBs/IMF/etal have WarRoomed the possibilities sufficiently in order to be ready when the offal hits the oscillator. Accordingly, they will likely react in panic. Which would indicate the reset could go in any direction.

That said...
I think the most likely reset (should it occur within the near or mid term) would be a return to gold as the ultimate basis of world monetary system. I suppose there might be an interim step of 'backed by SDR', but I don't expect that particular sleight of hand to last more than a decade itself.


Agree again, since they (CB) got lots of gold, and no bitcoin.
However, I subscribe to Jim Rogers notion that when stocks would get smashed, gold would decline as well (temporarily), albeit it could rally 10% more first.
Eventually, SDRs would probably be based on precious metal basket (or just gold) plus, hopefully, bitcoin (once CB get some).



1071. Post 52181013 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on August 16, 2019, 08:46:16 PM
Bad news.

After yesterday's green everything is awesome candle, we got the red candle again, at least for now. Looks like it is going to test that 9.2-9.3k.


I'll buy some serious amounts if this goes below $8k. and I don't mean small potatoes like $100.

Any post starting with "bad news" smells like FUD to me. Recently both mindrust and lambie are posting their predictions based on nothing (I recall a better expression, but I don't want to be rude because I really liked these guys at first). It looks like they are trying to influence the others with their repetetive 4900 resp. 7000-8000 claims. Guys, you are very new to the Bitcoin world. The market punished you for 6 months, now you are hoping to catch back what was missed. It is better to be honest and not lie to us. Learn your lessons, invest regularly and don't try to cheat the market, it will bite you. Leave the trade and FUD trolling to the pro's.  Don't go to the dark side!  Grin

By the end of 2014 I had sold all other investments and after setting aside a large chunk for cap gains taxes I was 100 percent in Bitcoin.


Cool story and time-wise very similar to mine, albeit I did not liquidate all fiat: left retirement portfolio intact (mainly due to penalties), but decreased my regular brokerage accounts 80% (at the time) since I did not want to borrow money.
You have to sell fiat to buy corn, right?
I don't think poorly of short term (or even long term) bears as long as their opinion is rational, like yours.
Hopefully, long term is up, but fluctuations are to be expected.
Stock market, on the other hand, is behaving in bipolar fashion.
I am mostly out into short term bonds (before the rate cut as I was expecting a plunge) since I can handle just one asset class with super high volatility, not two or three.

I wonder if you had the same feeling I had in 14.

Most likely. Call it a love at first sight or being hit by lightning or dumbstruck.
That was almost all I could think about for a while (lasting a pretty long time, for me).
Maybe bitcoin is some kind of a social/mind virus?



1072. Post 52181414 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: Dabs on August 16, 2019, 10:27:47 PM
In 2015 I sold 800 BTC to buy a house for my family.

In 2018 I sold my house and bought back 50 BTC.

People who thinks I'm crazy for selling my house please know that my only regret is to have sold my bitcoins.

Investment in Real Estate is now garbage comparing to #Bitcoin.

https://twitter.com/bitcoinization/status/1161310562866880513?s=21

Story for a Dumbass or a Legend?

I see he’s brave to admit his wrong being and buying back BTC there should be merit in that act, but F*** how dumb to sold all of his BTC for a house..... (I think all of his BTC, not sure but if he had left it should be more so he wouldn’t sell the house to buy again 50 ....)

That is fucking crazy to have sold that many BTC in 2015 - clearly 2015 was a BIG ASS dip in the market for pretty much the whole year....   Pretty much mid-$200s for the whole year (bouncing around some, of course).

Lack of delayed gratification.

If the short-sighted guy knew that he wanted a house, he could have sold some in 2014 in the $600 plus territory (maybe not all of them) or just waited the matter out until 2017.. or even taken out a mortgage... but whatever, its a form of short-sightedness in a decently strong kind of way.   The buy back of the house for only 50 BTC shows how god-damned difficult it would be to get anywhere close to 800 BTC ever again for a person with such a seemingly average budget.

Everyone says we should have all bought corns back in 2013 or 2012 (or as early as you were introduced to bitcoin.)

But ... as it is, I'm still struggling to make ends meet.

an interesting observation, actually.

maybe we can surmise that it is unlikely that one's financial situation can be significantly (and long term) improved by shrewd investments if only for a fact that we are all feeble humans who buy too late and/or sell too early.

The likelihood of a particular person making 1000X their investment within, say, five years and not losing it within the next five is probably close to zero.
It is very unlikely to happen.

Aiming at 10x within 10 years and not losing the bulk later is probably the most one can do.
Granted, OGs and anybody buying the bulk before $1000 got more, but the game is not over yet.



1073. Post 52183076 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Impossibru!



1074. Post 52187635 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Why, suddenly, there is a discussion on whether bearish opinions are even welcomed.
You can be a short term bear, but long term bull. Heck, you can even be a long term bear as long as you describe your opinion intelligently.
Here, like on the stock boards, some people always mistake an opinion with an ability to influence the price.

Personally, I like to look at charts and various scenarios.
If you are 100% bitcoin with no cash/stocks cushion, this makes you inflexible and unable to get bargains on the dip.
Obviously, a mistake, in my view.
Anyone has their own diversification criteria, though. What could be OK for some is an insane gamble for others.

My criteria has always been: try to accumulate as much btc as possible, but have enough fiat investments so I can retire (eventually) on those plus soc sec. Bitcoin being super unconventional investment is a great stimulant and hope, but I never counted on it to make my ends meet. I believe, this gives me freedom to evaluate the trend better, hopefully, albeit I never shorted btc (so far).



1075. Post 52188148 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Interesting, but, hopefully, btc will run further as gold peaked at $800 in around 1980, then peaked in 2011 at around 1800.
Providing similar proportions to btc would result in the $44.5K target for btc (before correction). Some people might be disappointed (expect more).
Of course, it does not have to match.

Historically, there is one interesting notion re gold market... the saying goes like this: the value of Dow and gold price in $$ always reach parity (1:1) at some point (their respective charts intercept or get very close).

Whether it would be 25000 Dow and 25000 gold or 12000 Dow and 12000 Gold or anything in between or below, but, historically, chart intercept always happened in 20th century (on multiple occasions).

Maybe we should predict a similar intercept for the Dow/bitcoin price  Grin



1076. Post 52188372 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: jojo69 on August 17, 2019, 04:57:26 PM
BTC:DOW 1:1 is going to be one of those milestone ratios like BTC:Gold that we are going to pass forever and leave far, far behind.

Hopefully, and then, eventually, BTC:BRK-A 1:1.



1077. Post 52188920 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Hey, guys, I am sure there is a book/ebook, maybe two or three on this board (or much more): Bob, jbreher, lambieslayer, JJG, HM, micg, LFC, Searing, sorry if I missed any other candidates willing to share.

Don't let alts take all the glory:
https://www.amazon.com/Confessions-Crypto-Millionaire-Unlikely-Corporate-ebook/dp/B07VBS7Z5K/



1078. Post 52190651 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 17, 2019, 08:36:04 PM
I don't know when, but I'm 99% certain there will be a grand worldwide monetary reset within my lifetime. Perhaps as early as next week.

Oh gosh... That seems to be a high level of certainty that you are placing on something that I attribute, approximately 1% odds.

Maybe that is part of the explanation for our differing views?

Perhaps, but likely only in respect to closely-related topics.

Q: Do you believe the insiders (e.g., Paulson, Geithner, Bernanke, et al) who stated back in 2008 the world was close to a complete and total financial meltdown?

Q: What changes enacted since then to stave off the possibility of further such events have actually made progress towards that objective?

In short, there is no particular reason to think the next financial crisis will tip over the apple cart.

Most likely, yes, but I am troubled by a fact that Albert Edwards keeps being proven right (in the long run).
He long predicted that Japanese experience in 1989-2009 will repeat itself, first in EU, then US and it started to happen with negative yields, no growth, etc.
He predicts US 10 year notes eventually close to -1%. Imagine that.
https://www.advisorperspectives.com/articles/2019/01/21/albert-edwards-on-the-problems-facing-the-us-italy-and-china
Quote
His key prediction was that over the next 12- to 18-month period, U.S. bonds yields will decline and converge with those in Germany and Switzerland. Those yields will end up in negative territory, according to Edwards.

Well, we had driven 30 year down from 3.5 to 2% in a space of just 10 months (almost a 43% decline). More to come, most likely.

We don't know how this would affect bitcoin. Probably a mixed basket.

TL;DR If A. Edwards is right (and he certainly was on bonds) and we are going down 75-80% in equities in the next recession, I wouldn't be so sure about the apple cart



1079. Post 52190743 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 17, 2019, 11:23:19 PM
I don't know when, but I'm 99% certain there will be a grand worldwide monetary reset within my lifetime. Perhaps as early as next week.

Oh gosh... That seems to be a high level of certainty that you are placing on something that I attribute, approximately 1% odds.

Maybe that is part of the explanation for our differing views?

Perhaps, but likely only in respect to closely-related topics.

Q: Do you believe the insiders (e.g., Paulson, Geithner, Bernanke, et al) who stated back in 2008 the world was close to a complete and total financial meltdown?

Q: What changes enacted since then to stave off the possibility of further such events have actually made progress towards that objective?

In short, there is no particular reason to think the next financial crisis will tip over the apple cart.

Most likely, yes, but I am troubled by a fact that Albert Edwards keeps being proven right (in the long run).
He long predicted that Japanese experience in 1989-2009 will repeat itself, first in EU, then US and it started to happen with negative yields, no growth, etc.
He predicts US 10 year notes eventually close to -1%. Imagine that.
https://www.advisorperspectives.com/articles/2019/01/21/albert-edwards-on-the-problems-facing-the-us-italy-and-china
Quote
His key prediction was that over the next 12- to 18-month period, U.S. bonds yields will decline and converge with those in Germany and Switzerland. Those yields will end up in negative territory, according to Edwards.

Well, we had driven 30 year down from 3.5 to 2% in a space of just 10 months (almost a 43% decline). More to come, most likely.

We don't know how this would affect bitcoin. Probably a mixed basket.

TL;DR If A. Edwards is right (and he certainly was on bonds) and we are going down 75-80% in equities in the next recession, I wouldn't be so sure about the apple cart


Every man and his dog have now successfully predicted a recession over the 18 months.  

This to me is proof a recession will not happen in that time frame.  

From the linked article:

Quote
The economist Brad de Long has noted that three of last four recessions were from unforeseen shocks in financial markets (the collapse of the dot-com bubble, the real estate bubble and the S&L crisis).

The current bond inversion is sufficiently foreseen that this recession will be avoided.

IMHO, 50:50.
The previously unforeseen factors are tariffs and/or US-China spat (which could easily become long term).



1080. Post 52190969 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on August 18, 2019, 12:16:17 AM
^^
I was the 5th vote  Grin

I see your point  Tongue



1081. Post 52192548 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: Dabs on August 17, 2019, 01:02:13 AM
The best scenario is buy BTC when it was below $50. (Ideally, when it was below $1). So you have say a few thousand corns. Let's say 10k.
Then you participate in, let's say ETH, and part with half of your corns. so that's 10 million ETH.
Then you participate in a bunch of different ICOs with maybe even just 1 million ETH. And you do an average of 5x. Some go to zero. Some go 10x. Then bring it all back to ETH or BTC.
Then you HODL until ATH... maybe at 15k per BTC, 1k per ETH.

Then, it would take me a literal couple of years cashing out about $10k USD every other day, so I can spread all over the world in 10 different fiat currencies and still have more than half left over in BTC, because there are still so many things I can't buy with just BTC, and everything else has to be paid in fiat and I don't mind investing in some traditional index ETFs to let it sit for the next 10 years.

At one point in time, I had available to me about $20k USD from a bank, in the Philippines, in about 2014. I could have used it to buy all corn back then ... it was maybe $500? So about 40 corns. If that's all I HODL'd until now and even with interest, I could have sold maybe 4 corns, paid back the loan, and still have 36 corns; or invested half in the ETH ICO and gotten 40k ETH.


But none of us knew that. Still. What if ...

Just noticed it, but your calcs are wrong...
10mil ETh would be $1.84 bil (now)-14.4bil (at the peak)...
Therefore at $10K every other day it would take someone 504-4114 years to cash out (theoretically, of course), NOT a couple of years.
js

PS: When i just started stock investment, i was building similar imaginary scenarios: what if i buy AMZN, then switch to GOOGL, then back to AMZN or FB, going on and on.
Not possible to create such branching in reality (both in stocks and in btc plus the rest of crypto), too many possibilities that you know about only post factum.



1082. Post 52199674 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: aesma on August 18, 2019, 07:36:43 PM

Regarding Armageddon, I am still suggesting that guys gotta be fucking super careful regarding how much credence that they are giving to Armageddon scenarios that are likely in the less than 1%  likelihood and h9ow much of their value are they investing into such a low likely scenario.

Do the fuck what you like, ultimately, but it is also good to attempt to grapple with the probabilities and don't be fucking investing way the fuck higher than the probabilities that you even assign to such events.  Yeah, if you happen to be an Armageddon nutjob then you are going to assign higher values to that so there is ONLY so much that normal people can  talk the dumb out of dumb, so do the fuck what you like if you are assigning higher probabilities to such situations.

Owning gold but being a fat useless guy, you're just going to get robbed/killed !

read "World war Z" (and i mean read, not the movie)
There are several interesting sub-stories there on unfit becoming VERY fit.

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 18, 2019, 07:42:23 PM
expect large US infrastructure spends in the future. This would be enough for the US to avoid recession alone.

The US gubmint can financialize themselves any amount of currency. The problem is that those in charge confuse financializing currency with marshaling wealth. Funny thing about wealth is that it is tangible, and cannot be zapped into existence by an entry into a spreadsheet.

I wouldn’t be so sure about that.

HM, I am at a loss of the meaning. Money from thin air?
My opinion is: garbage in-garbage out, but maybe with some delay.
Personally, I believe in reality that does not involve "helicopter" money.



1083. Post 52199869 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 18, 2019, 08:12:04 PM
expect large US infrastructure spends in the future. This would be enough for the US to avoid recession alone.

The US gubmint can financialize themselves any amount of currency. The problem is that those in charge confuse financializing currency with marshaling wealth. Funny thing about wealth is that it is tangible, and cannot be zapped into existence by an entry into a spreadsheet.

I wouldn’t be so sure about that.

HM, I am at a loss of the meaning. Money from thin air?
My opinion is: garbage in-garbage out, but maybe with some delay.
Personally, I believe in reality that does not involve "helicopter" money.

The US$ role as global reserve currency afford the US government certain liberties, such as creating wealth from thin air.

money printing != wealth
So, they print more. How, exactly, it creates wealth?
It's exactly the opposite: it creates more debt. I cannot see how having more debt makes me/country wealthier.
re nominal deficits-there I can agree. You cannot be a world's reserve currency and not run a deficit.



1084. Post 52199952 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 18, 2019, 08:21:06 PM
expect large US infrastructure spends in the future. This would be enough for the US to avoid recession alone.

The US gubmint can financialize themselves any amount of currency. The problem is that those in charge confuse financializing currency with marshaling wealth. Funny thing about wealth is that it is tangible, and cannot be zapped into existence by an entry into a spreadsheet.

I wouldn’t be so sure about that.

HM, I am at a loss of the meaning. Money from thin air?
My opinion is: garbage in-garbage out, but maybe with some delay.
Personally, I believe in reality that does not involve "helicopter" money.

The US$ role as global reserve currency afford the US government certain liberties, such as creating wealth from thin air.  The flipside is you cannot be the global reserve currency without perpetual nominal trade deficits, something that Trump is far too dumb to understand.  

money printing != wealth
So, they print more. How, exactly, it creates wealth?
It's exactly the opposite.
re nominal deficits-there I can agree. You cannot be a world's reserve currency and not run a deficit.

According to classical economics, money printing != wealth on the assumption that money printing = inflation

Now riddle me this.

 When was the last time that the USA had an inflation problem, and how much money has been printed since then?

How about right now. It just went to ballooning student loans, healthcare expenses, housing prices, etc.
Inflation calculators/CPI estimates are wrong, it is clear to anyone with an unbiased view.
Does CPI include tariffs? No, but these are real numbers folks are paying.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/perianneboring/2014/02/03/if-you-want-to-know-the-real-rate-of-inflation-dont-bother-with-the-cpi/



1085. Post 52200019 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 18, 2019, 08:33:29 PM
Hey, guys, I am sure there is a book/ebook, maybe two or three on this board (or much more): Bob, jbreher, lambieslayer, JJG, HM, micg, LFC, Searing, sorry if I missed any other candidates willing to share.

Don't let alts take all the glory:
https://www.amazon.com/Confessions-Crypto-Millionaire-Unlikely-Corporate-ebook/dp/B07VBS7Z5K/

Yep... either he is already deluded in the event that he  chose that title himself, or he is a wimpy ass fuck to allow his editor to cause such dumbass amorphous and/or meaningless term, "crypto."  What the fuck is crypto?  Who knows?  

Never wanted to write a book?
I believe many should try and tell their (or some other) story.
I had a lot of fun reading my grandma's and her sister's books.



1086. Post 52200878 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

The way I see it, if you truly believe that printing money creates wealth, than you did not get the very idea of bitcoin.
Yes, you can be a trader of it, of course, which I guess many here are.

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 18, 2019, 10:19:09 PM
Here is another question.  What is the NPV of the US national debt in a negative interest rate environment?

Tell me, but I heard that NIRP has consequences:

Quote
1) compress net interest margins and bank profits;
2) damage consumer and business confidence;
3) provide little incentive for business invest in capital rather than buy back stock;
4) hurt savers;
5) makes active management more difficult by dampening dispersion;
6) increase demand for gold and other hard assets; and,
7) likely widen the wealth gap

https://www.barrons.com/articles/strategas-7-unintended-consequences-of-nirp-1465825134



1087. Post 52206793 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

sex thinking is closing on bitcoin...oh, no.

those horny otc desks guys/gals are picking up the slack...  /s



1088. Post 52207301 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Ivanontech (swedish Ivan that is) on the tube:

https://youtu.be/Fp1V031y8qo?t=541



1089. Post 52210937 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: lightfoot on August 20, 2019, 03:08:24 AM
Those who don't have Bitcoin in any real amount, think about SEX.

Those who have bitcoin have no need to think about bitcoin. So they have sex.

The question was not about "having", it was about thinking  Grin

BTW, IRL general population, females are thinking/dreaming about sex much more than men (anecdotal evidence).



1090. Post 52211049 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 20, 2019, 03:21:21 AM
I think there will be alts with big dominance:

• USD stable coins

• Tokenised loans paying interest

• Tokenised bitcoin futures

• New attempts at the “next Bitcoin” including more Bitcoin forks

Basically a plethora of exotic financial instruments and derivatives.   No ICO shit. That stuff is dead.

What he (hairy) said.

Unlikely. Not that I care much, but you underestimate the ability of Wall Street to create a rush to some token in a true bull market.
Some zombies might revive and some will join the fray.
Why? Because there is a certain group of investors who harp on POW and think that POS will allow them to "earn" interest.
However, the only way btc goes from 10.8K to 29K in 6mo and STILL loses up to 30% of dominance would mean top three-five alts quadrupling to quintupling in the same 6mo.
IMHO, it's not going to happen.
I don't see how btc can truly earn interest, apart from questionable re-hypothecation schemes (in which I don't partake).



1091. Post 52211083 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 20, 2019, 03:46:40 AM
[edited out]

Unlikely. Not that I care much, but you underestimate the ability of Wall Street to create a rush to some token in a true bull market.
Some zombies might revive and some will join the fray.
Why? Because there is a certain group of investors who harp on POW and think that POS will allow them to "earn" interest.
I don't see how btc can truly earn interest, apart from questionable re-hypothecation schemes (in which I don't partake).

I don't see how in my earlier post, I am making any kind of "estimation" of the power of wall street that significantly or materially differs from your estimations of the powers (abilities) of wall street.

You are agreeing with the opinion that ONLY some unclear tokenization (how loan tokenization creates any value whatsoever-a rhetorical question) and new btc forks (lol) would create significant market cap value.
There are better candidates.



1092. Post 52229944 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

A theory:
Funds got so infatuated with planB analysis (see his twitter) that they are smacking down btc every time it tries to rally much from the 'theoretical' 8-9K. At some point they will stop; maybe in a month (as HM suggests) or in 6-9mo OR anywhere in between.



1093. Post 52248023 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Things are becoming more and more chaotic.
My preference would be for flat equities and for bitcoin to appreciate against this background.
It does not look this way at the moment.
Dow is actually below its Jan 22, 2018 value, some bull market we have. Oh, well.

I am still of the opinion that bitcoin needs at least a flat market to grow.
If stocks would get seriously smashed, btc would decline as well, at least initially.

Carney's libra-like ideas are meaningless without multiple major countries backing it and I don't see anyone even acknowledging it (so far).



1094. Post 52248365 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: lightfoot on August 24, 2019, 01:46:42 AM
In the meantime it's looking like a good time to drop gold you hold and not bitcoins.

Cool time to be alive.

I don't mind gold going up as it increases the value we can eventually take via wealth transfer from gold toward bitcoin (from the old to the new). However, everybody was predicting a retrace of 1300-1350. Instead, gold ripped up (for now)



1095. Post 52253468 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 24, 2019, 04:45:32 AM
Things are becoming more and more chaotic.
My preference would be for flat equities and for bitcoin to appreciate against this background.
It does not look this way at the moment.
Dow is actually below its Jan 22, 2018 value, some bull market we have. Oh, well.

I am still of the opinion that bitcoin needs at least a flat market to grow.
If stocks would get seriously smashed, btc would decline as well, at least initially.

Carney's libra-like ideas are meaningless without multiple major countries backing it and I don't see anyone even acknowledging it (so far).

You are surely coming off as a weak hand, Biodom.... like you are easily scared into doing something crazy, like selling on the way down (or worse at the bottom)...     Cry Cry Cry

you are projecting...I am hodling btc, selling a bit of equities (including GLD, which was just a profitable trade).
I will sell some, though, if Biden would look like winning. I paid 39.6 % before during a good year in the internet "bubble" and it was brutal.

Some people don't know these facts, but for US citizens there are two-three relevant rules:
1. If you have capital gains, you pay 15-20% for long term (more than 12 mo) plus additional 3.8% (NIIT) on gains when you have above 200K AGI and up to maximum rate (37%) for short term trades. Biden suggests that we should pay up to max tax on ALL trades, long or short. Maximum is 37% plus, maybe 3.8=40.8%.
2. It does not matter where your address is, as US citizen, you are still responsible for these taxes. The only exception is Puerto-Rico, but you have to actually LIVE there 183 days each year.
3. The way they truly get you is by taxing gains, but allowing only $3000 per year in losses. This way, you could be in a situation where you pay large gains one year, but are allowed only limited recourse (3K) when you have a large loss. I find this very unfair.



1096. Post 52254434 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: Torque on August 24, 2019, 04:08:35 PM

3. The way they truly get you is by taxing gains, but allowing only $3000 per year in losses. This way, you could be in a situation where you pay large gains one year, but are allowed only limited recourse (3K) when you have a large loss. I find this very unfair.

Yes, but any losses that exceed $3K you can roll over YoY.

True, but it is still a limitation as there is no such limit on gains.
It is what it is.



1097. Post 52255230 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Not that most people here need convincing, but here is a very detailed description of why bitcoin investment is much preferred over alts:

https://medium.com/@damiandurruty/bitcoin-not-ethereum-4d916f519f11



1098. Post 52255649 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: mindrust on August 24, 2019, 07:40:31 PM


June 11 2017, first time we hit the MM 2.5 after a long break of ~3.5 years since the Gox crash. On June 26 2019, we again went above 2.5 MM since January 9 2018. After ~1.5 years.

The consolidation might take a bit longer but, sooner or later, if things go like we all expect, more or less, the chart will look like this.



We are getting closer,

to the endgame.

Maybe, but timewise you are are projecting it to happen too fast.
On your graph note a jump from 450 to around 850 (in 2016)...this happened at prior halving.
If halvings are the engine, we might be range bound at least until May of 2020.
On the other hand, if halvings would have only minor influence from now on and we discount them earlier, THEN you might be right.



1099. Post 52255816 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on August 24, 2019, 08:35:49 PM
...
The consolidation might take a bit longer ...

Interesting find, mindrust. But ATH before halving is impossible, isn't it? So I would extend everything on the time axis.

Nice catch, that's why I said, it would take a bit longer.

That's the only concern I have here.

filbfilb (some TA god) on the other hand also said this bull run might develop earlier than we all guessed so who knows.

*He said it, because we exactly know what happens after the halving, so,,, many of us will start accumulating a lot earlier than the halving date (if already haven't started),,, means, it might rocket a lot earlier. We weren't so sure about this in 2017. (I wasn't)



Yeah, sooner/later isn't as relevant as the peak and subsequent drop. If you're into EW jazz that wave could end up being III of a 5 wave run-up culminating with a 300k+/- peak around end of 2021.

I have a slightly different long term scenario.
BTC rises to 55-60K during this bull, perhaps 350K in the next, but then succumbs to a long term bear market.
Maybe it would coincide with economic decline, maybe not, but these neat halving-induced bumps would stop (or be diminished) at some point. The timing of bear market would depend on when we will reach the mid term peak, which would be around 300-400K in the best case scenario, IMHO.



1100. Post 52256346 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on August 24, 2019, 10:02:52 PM
PR is not a country and as Jbreher said not tax free for Crypto,

While true, if you enter into contract with PR gov under Act 20 or 22, there are huge tax advantages - crypto or not.

Agreed. I spent a few weeks living in San Juan deciding if it would be worth it living there half the year to get the tax savings. I eventually decided against it, but its a tempting proposition.

it would be twice as tempting if CGT would go to 39.6%.
However, I am tempted to not sell at all and leave the tax question to my putative descendants.

Oh, btw, the Secure act in US (if Senate takes it) would mean that your kids and/or grandkinds would have to spend your unspent 401K and IRA in just 10 years. Their possible reaction:"Weeeee...free money!"



1101. Post 52257996 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 25, 2019, 03:35:02 AM
If you have 10BTC, you are a Sat billionaire.

funny...Circle OTC trade is $100K minimum, which is almost exactly 10 btc.
I wonder if there is a realization that each trade might constitute many $$ millions (if not a cool bil) later on.



1102. Post 52258068 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: bkbirge on August 25, 2019, 04:21:30 AM
Not that most people here need convincing, but here is a very detailed description of why bitcoin investment is much preferred over alts:

https://medium.com/@damiandurruty/bitcoin-not-ethereum-4d916f519f11

Thanks for sharing, very interesting article, merit to you.

Sure, I also thought that author (who is an elite programmer) described it all very succinctly.



1103. Post 52266547 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

OT: Greizmann! What a show.

micg: interesting quotes...

That r/K "discussion" is mostly rubbish:

1. It only works at a species OR even higher level (fish vs mammals, for example), NOT at the level of individual families.
2. Just one example: Benjamin Franklin had 16 brothers and sisters, yet he was a very distinguished individual, no doubt.





1104. Post 52266934 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 25, 2019, 09:48:14 PM
25 August 2015 was the final and darkest day of the 2014/15 crypto winter.




Today is 25 August 2019



We seem to be less volatile on a daily basis than in 2015.
Funny, I was watching GBTC back then and noticed the reduction in premium (to NAV) on either 18th or 25th, but somehow did not pull the trigger in IRAs.
Still don't know, why, it just happened...I guess I was expecting an ETF soon (not waiting for it any longer).



1105. Post 52287430 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

I posit that hodlers would probably do very well in a marshmallow test (when they were kids). I doubt that anyone here was tested, so....

The question is: who is the strongest btc hodler on WO?
Possible qualifications: never sold any bitcoin (holdling at least since the peak in 2013 or earlier) for fiat and/or alts and forks.
Direct purchasing of things is OK since without spending there would be no btc success story.
Come forward, tell the story and let us admire your persistence against all odds.



1106. Post 52287794 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_16.59h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 28, 2019, 02:51:03 AM
Interim ruling by the judge in Kleinbold v Craig Wright

TLDR:  Judge rules that CSW is a lying shithead.


Quote
The hearing testimony that the trust holds only keys, not bitcoin, cannot be reconciled with the statements in the April 18 Motion and the May 8 declaration that it contains bitcoin...It is not credible that, given his claim to have an unmatched understanding of Bitcoin, he would have mistaken the Bitcoin currency for the keys that control the ability to transfer the currency.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.277.0.pdf


Not disagreeing with a gist of it, but honorable made a whoopsie there.
Somehow most lawyers cannot understand that the ability to transfer bitcoin (having private keys) IS bitcoin.



1107. Post 52298442 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Nobody seems to be able to predict bitcoin moves, not in 2017 and not now. 2018 drop was predictable (only the extent of it wasn't).
I think that altocalypse will continue until everyone is even more bearish. ETHE is STILL running at more than 100% premium to NAV, for crissake.



1108. Post 52306802 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on August 29, 2019, 11:43:51 PM
Most fiat money is debt, so negative interest rates mean that more money gets borrowed, meaning more debt is created, meaning more money is being printed.
Asset inflation continues unabated.
Market will lose confidence in the sustainability of money-printing suddenly.

https://twitter.com/jimmysong/status/1167203731550670851?s=21



Mmmmmm plan BTC


Suddenly? I thought so too, then remembered that Japanese are at it since 1989 (for 30 years).
I don't wish for that day to come, so this suspended animation might be OK
I give the sudden loss of confidence 50:50 chance in the next 10-20 years.



1109. Post 52307118 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

WAGs=wives and girlfriends, usually of famous personalities, rockstars and/or football players (football that is called soccer in US).
This term is not typical in US, mostly in use in UK and probably Australia.



1110. Post 52313412 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on August 30, 2019, 04:53:24 AM
She looks like a dragon



I see GodziRRRaaaa...



1111. Post 52316453 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

After institutions got involved, bitcoin price moves become half-moves.
Anyone learning Portuguese? Lol



1112. Post 52323450 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: mindrust on August 31, 2019, 08:27:16 PM
Every time our parents had a kid, they were born into this shitstorm and try to survive it.


I dunno, life was pretty good at least until 2001 (that's quite a bit for me, maybe very little for you, youngins).
After that, lots of stuff that was not so good.
Sometimes, I think that an outlook depends more on your personal circumstances rather than being country-specific.



1113. Post 52332629 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on September 01, 2019, 01:26:35 PM
@Alexanderjest

The case of $100 000 000 per Bitcoin.
Bitcoin could be $100 m+ without hyperinflation @ Worldwide Adoption
The total cap of BTC should be equal to World Total Wealth (WTW), which in 60 years will be weĺl above $3000T.
As you can find below the graph represents that process.



web link to the secondary content deleted

We are the next generation of uber, wealthy elite.

That alexanderjest just posted the content without any attribution.
LFC, it is not your fault, but let's not reference the secondary.
The original content was here (about 13 mo earlier):
https://twitter.com/MustStopMurad/status/1022169639386836992
or if you want to reference his twitter page, here:
https://twitter.com/MustStopMurad?lang=en



1114. Post 52332699 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: mindrust on September 01, 2019, 02:00:47 PM
One more BTC bull run and that's it. I'll be unemployed, living on passive income just like makrospex.

Merited, but bitcoin does not provide passive income, unless you are into rehypothecation games with blockfi, etc.
BTC is a hard money, but you need to exchange it to soft money to live off of (for now).



1115. Post 52333302 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: btcbeliever on September 02, 2019, 01:00:59 AM
One more BTC bull run and that's it. I'll be unemployed, living on passive income just like makrospex.

Merited, but bitcoin does not provide passive income, unless you are into rehypothecation games with blockfi, etc.
BTC is a hard money, but you need to exchange it to soft money to live off of (for now).
It's totally possible to replace a salary with interest payments on Bitcoin holdings without selling.
If you have held for enough years.
The only option I know is Celsius.

yes, blockfi and Celsius, but such interest is not "native" to bitcoin blockchain and comes from a third party re-hypothecating your btc that you "lend" to them.
Essentially, you have to assume that they don't go belly up somehow and would always return your btc.
Do you feel lucky, hodler?



1116. Post 52339470 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on September 02, 2019, 02:39:43 PM
^
Breakout....

i’m the last person able to do this ........ Tongue

I almost went blind trying to read that, ha ha



1117. Post 52339491 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: Torque on September 02, 2019, 03:20:00 PM
Those wondering about the impact of BAKKT on the market, needs to realize something else.

It's not the fact that they are going live within days. It's completely the relative timing.

They could have gone live over a year ago. The tech was already in place and working behind closed doors.

But they didn't. They delayed it.

So ask yourself: Why go live now? Why not a year ago? Or why not kick the can for another year?

Is it too obvious to state that we were in a bear market last year, the impact of opening would have been minimal & the interest would have been lower?

Yes, somewhat true. But look at what's happening globally right now. Global recession. Currencies are hyper inflating. Equities bubble. Bond market bubble. Asset bubbles. Negative interest rates in govt and corporate bonds. PMs are up bigly.

The fact is that "they" had zero interest in a true hedge trade (aka physical Bitcoin), until right now. It suddenly became an overnight imperative, so it seems.

I would love this to be true, but I am also prepared for a few more "slings and arrows of the outrageous fortune".
They are still trying to cut loose as many as possible.



1118. Post 52339587 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: mindrust on September 02, 2019, 05:30:36 AM
One more BTC bull run and that's it. I'll be unemployed, living on passive income just like makrospex.

Merited, but bitcoin does not provide passive income, unless you are into rehypothecation games with blockfi, etc.
BTC is a hard money, but you need to exchange it to soft money to live off of (for now).

That's right. Sadly I'll have to break some bitcoins for FIAT to make that possible. (Depends on the investment, probably all, but 1)

I haven't decided what to do with the (imaginary) money yet. Maybe buying a few flats and renting them away to the wage slaves. The easiest,  o brainer, but a bit disgusting way to do it.

What other passive income ideas have you got? Help me out!

I am starting to think even $1m won't be enough to live free. Maybe I aimed too low. Shoulda aimed for $10m instead. :d Aand its going up, need to buy more before it leaves the surface of the earth completely.

This is one of the questions I am pondering as well.
A modification of your plan: buy vacation properties, then hire a management company to deal with them.
vacation properties in good vacation spots in US have a 5%-10% (of the property cost) yearly cash flow.Considering that with good credit score you'll need to put down only 5-10% of the property cost, it does sound interesting (not my idea, but i kinds of like it).
Another advantage: you get to go on vacation at your own property where you carve out a week or two for yourself, Wink



1119. Post 52339673 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: Torque on September 02, 2019, 05:27:43 PM
The most lucrative RE in the future will be Senior housing complexes and near retirement housing complexes.

The second most lucrative will be young professional apartments in major city hubs.

Because neither of these two groups will be able to afford houses in the future, and likely won't even want them.

This seems to be correct. I see several multistory (17-20 stories tall) retirement buildings under construction smack in the middle of the otherwise healthy area in my city.
Luxury apartments for seniors (independent living, but with some medical staff, etc).
Second also correct, many such buildings are going up like mushrooms.
However, perhaps a bit too expensive a project to take on as a hodler/developer.



1120. Post 52339698 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: mindrust on September 02, 2019, 05:28:45 PM
One more BTC bull run and that's it. I'll be unemployed, living on passive income just like makrospex.

Merited, but bitcoin does not provide passive income, unless you are into rehypothecation games with blockfi, etc.
BTC is a hard money, but you need to exchange it to soft money to live off of (for now).

That's right. Sadly I'll have to break some bitcoins for FIAT to make that possible. (Depends on the investment, probably all, but 1)

I haven't decided what to do with the (imaginary) money yet. Maybe buying a few flats and renting them away to the wage slaves. The easiest,  o brainer, but a bit disgusting way to do it.

What other passive income ideas have you got? Help me out!

I am starting to think even $1m won't be enough to live free. Maybe I aimed too low. Shoulda aimed for $10m instead. :d Aand its going up, need to buy more before it leaves the surface of the earth completely.

This is one of the questions I am pondering as well.
A modification of your plan: buy vacation properties, then hire a management company to deal with them.
vacation properties in good vacation spots in US have a 5%-10% (of the property cost) yearly cash flow.Considering that with good credit score you'll need to put down only 5-10% of the property cost, it does sound interesting (not my idea, but i kind of like it).
Another advantage: you get to go on vacation at your own property where you carve out a week or two for yourself, Wink

At some point we all are going to realize there isn't "easy money" probably. (at least easy streaming money) BTC is the easiest money I've known so far. I made nearly as much (or more) money in 2 years from BTC by DCA'ing with pocket money than what I got from my job in 7 years.

Buying and renting properties is not really "passive". As others pointed out above, it is just another business where you still have customers.

Maybe It will be a better business than what you have now, maybe not but it is not really "passive"

Passive means "no effort" You spend effort to collect those damn rents.

you don't spend much effort if it is a vacation house as it is going either through management company, airbnb, vrbo, etc.
At least, this is my understanding of it. So far I was only the vacationer in those, though.



1121. Post 52339914 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: SuperTA on September 02, 2019, 06:01:53 PM
^
Breakout....

i’m the last person able to do this ........ Tongue

I almost went blind trying to read that, ha ha

you can avoid that, just quote the message and read properly  Cool

right, that's exactly what i did, hence the prior post Wink



1122. Post 52341467 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 02, 2019, 08:55:42 PM

I really like the look of this projected chart, especially the next ‘crash’ which shows the price at still over the current ATH. I can definitely live with that.

The problem with that chart is, the other 4 chars I shared were predicting $80-100k as the top, this one says it can go as high as $500k.

Where is the problem? If this one happens to be true and the others not, I won't be having enough btc to enjoy that  $500k. I know I'll be having at least 1, but is it enough? Cool

People will he cashing out to lambos like there is no tomorrow once we go above 50-60k. I find it pretty unrealistic to see it going above $100k in this bull run but who knows... what if...

It seems that you should prepare for both realistically bullish and outlandish scenarios, including the possibility to that we reach $500k in the next cycle.

Based on my knowledge of your BTC holdings, to me, it does seem as if you would be selling too much if you are down to 1 BTC anywhere after (or above) $100k.  

On the other hand, it might end up working out for you to sell higher amounts, yet it seems that you gotta figure out what level is actually comfortable for you, even  if it seems extreme and unlikely to happen.

There were surely some BTC HODLers who thought that $5k was the absolute top in the 2017 cycle and maybe they had only 1BTC after that, but then they were then paralyzed in selling it above $10k too because they felt that they had already sold their stash or shot their wadd by too much and too early.

My current 'feel' is pretty much inline with planB major thesis.
Unless something happens to break it, I would use his graph as a guideline.
Predicted value is 55K at the halving, then slowly moving about 2-3 fold from there toward next halving.
However, going backwards, btc was "supposed' to be at $3700 when it peaked at almost 20K, so it was roughly 6X predicted.
Therefore, the range of the next ATH is most likely 55k-330K with about 180-190K mid range.
When to sell depends on when the true parabola starts going fast.

TL;DR If planB is correct, we are going to 55K-330K as the next ATH. Midrange target of 150-200K is very appealing, albeit I might sell some at 120K. t



1123. Post 52341598 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on September 02, 2019, 09:53:26 PM
@Biodom
Give me some of that sweet, sweet HOPIUM  Cool

that was not enough?  Grin

in a fight between nice nippie pics and btc price projections, btc price wins for me, but I do appreciate the former.



1124. Post 52363506 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

Quote from: Ibian on September 05, 2019, 02:39:21 AM
It is more than just Lithium. According to the CEO of Sandfire Resources , we will need 12 times our current copper usage. The list goes on into other materials such as rare earths.

Don't get me wrong , I am for the green energy movement.
If it requires 12 times the materials we currently use then it's not "green", WHATEVER people think that means, it's just wasteful.

And just because I know people keep forgetting, co2 is not a pollutant.

you keep saying it, but this particular meme had absolutely NO meaning whatsoever:

1. Your cells 'exhaust' CO2, hence the exhalation process. Exhaust is exhaust, no doubt about the meaning of it.
2. Yes, there were periods on earth with MUCH higher levels of CO2. We did not live on the planet back then, so we don't know if it was cozy or not.
3. Human brain can tolerate only certain level of CO2 before you would be losing large IQ capacity. These levels are not too much higher than current (maybe about a double).
4. Plants LOVE CO2. Yes, for them it is something similar to food. We are not plants.
5. Last, but not least, try converting a small amount of dry ice in a limited space into gaseous form (CO2).
Breathe it in, but first sit down before doing this because the result is unmistakable.
It is like a hammer to the brain. In fact, don't do this, really.



1125. Post 52373019 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.00h):

1. Wow, that Hamilton vs Satoshi rap battle is pretty good...

2. On rotten banana and TNF...TNF is interesting/weird, but, unfortunately not a panacea.
One anecdote: Doctors had noted at some point that patients with very serious bacterial infections were paradoxically cured of tumors/cancers that they had. Hence, the investigation that resulted in TNF discovery.
Unfortunately, this cannot be put into practice for an obvious reason.
That said, nobody ever got poisoned by slightly rotten bananas, although super brown are just gross.

Gold got smashed today, but bitcoin was not...interesting...it is really an uncorrelated asset.
Maybe planB is right and bitcoin is controlled mainly by the underlying math in the form of the S/F.
I am a believer (for now).



1126. Post 52388294 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 07, 2019, 04:34:52 AM


Btc/Usd

For the short term i'm watching the yellow EMA line, which currently acts as a support on the 4h chart. The 4h candle closed above it. Currently the yellow line is around 10.270 Usd. If it stays above it will be bullish. If not we will find other support.


You sound undeniably correct.

BTC's price is going to go down until it stops going down, and if it does not stop going down where it should stop, then BTC's price is going to go down more.

I have learned a lot about bitcoin and about myself from such observations.    Wink  The chart helps to make that point, too.. Comes off as more professional.  Wink

I don't know about you but i buy on the support bounce. So i bought some back. If it reaches my target between 10.800 and 11.000 i sold 3 times already there. Yes it goes up and down but i tell where is the support (buy) and where resistance (sell). If it goes bellow support it means sell. (well i trade only 20% of my holdings, i never sell all.) Trader has to be prepared for both ways.

...This time, around, I don't really care, and I am fine with just continuing to follow my system that only sells small amounts on the way up and also buys back on the way down in intervals that are reasonable for me, and the tweaking this time around is to spread the intervals even more than they had been the first time around, but otherwise I am largely keeping with my system because I like it..

So, yeah a week or two ago, in our run up to a bit above $11k, I made several sales on the way up, and bought back at various points between about $10k and $9,400, and in this last run up to nearly $11k, I had a few BTC sell orders trigger, so the more that triggered, the higher my buy back points are.  I have sell orders on different exchanges so some of them triggered and some of them did not, but so far in this particular most recent correction, from today, NONE of my BTC buy back orders have triggered yet, and most of them are set for a little bit below $10k.  

In my earlier days, I would have had both my BTC buy orders and my BTC sell orders more tightly structured; however, these days I am more happy with larger intervals and my goal and recent practice has been to increase and increase and increase the integers in which such orders are triggered.

Another way of conceptualizing my strategy towards my BTC holdings has been to attempt to create my BTC buy/sell orders in such a way that I am largely NOT too much attached to price direction.. neither psychologically nor financially.  

Of course, I profit more from upwards BTC price movements, but it is also in my thinking that inevitably in the longer term BTC's price is much more likely to go up than it is to go down, but in the meantime, I am profiting from volatility in such a way that it causes me to become less and less concerned about BTC's price going down.  

Also, I have a plan that is projected into the future of starting to liquidate 1% of the value of my BTC stash per quarter, so long as the BTC price is not below $5k, and I am thinking that I will start to employ that particular plan in a few years, and I think that there are real decent chances that the BTC price is not going to go below $5k in the coming years or to interfere with my tentative liquidation plan, and if BTC's price does go below $5k, then I will just plan to hold off on cashing out my 1% during any such quarters that the BTC price does go below $5k, if such periods of low BTC price performance were to come, once I start my liquidation plan.

The strategy of constantly selling and buying has one weakness: it produces LOTS of tax obligations during periods of fast btc growth.
Theoretically, if someone was selling extensively, then re-buying in 2017, then watching btc declining to 3k while having serious tax obligations resulting in a need to a selling of the additional chunk at a suboptimal (low) price.
Of course, this would not be the case when ample cash is available to pay the tax.
In other words, in high taxing environment, this strategy might backfire.

On the other hand, trying to sell at the top could be a difficult undertaking as well. The local top is currently projected (by various authors) to be anywhere between 30K and 400K. Tough choice.
HM here favors 180K (don't know where the number came from, maybe just personal preference).
My current feel is to allocate certain % for a sale, then sell once a personal preference is set in 1/10 fractions of the final number of btc sells. I intend to sell only up to 20% of my btc at the next ATH, knowing fully well that the rest would probably correct to 20% of the value. Why? Because I don't want to lose my position due to unforeseen price trajectory changes (like a double peak of 2013)..



1127. Post 52388457 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on September 07, 2019, 04:39:22 PM
There's a lot of evidence that Segwit is the alteration. Read the docs, the white paper
The same evidence that CSW is satoshi?

WTF are you on about? How could evidence of personal identity have anything whatsoever to do with evidence of protocol change?

Quote
I'm not sure if you're trolling or trying to be serious.

Back at ya.

See any evidence of SegWit in the white paper? No?

Explicitly in front of your face. Willful dereliction of truthiness.

SegWit was indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol. Undeniably. There is really no way to argue otherwise.

...and why that protocol could not be changed?



1128. Post 52388596 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Humor from reddit:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/d0seuh/gift_to_wife/

Will this mark the end of alt winter? Naaaah.



1129. Post 52390216 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: SuperTA on September 07, 2019, 08:59:52 PM
WO September Statistics (Merits Received/Sent)

micgoossens received 45 sent 45
fillippone received 31 sent 12
SuperTA received 28 sent 27
makrospex received 27  sent 18
JayJuanGee  received 25  sent 39
LFC_Bitcoin received 21  sent 25

vroom received  19 sent 3
Globb0 received 18 sent 40
Icygreen received 18 sent 4
Toxic2040 received 18 sent 0
d_eddie received 17 sent 8
Last of the V8s received 17  sent 6
mindrust received 16  sent 20
xhomerx10  15 sent 4
VB1001 received 15 sent 13
Dabs received  14 sent 96  
Wilhelm received 14 sent 20
jojo69 received 14 sent 4

HairyMaclairy received 9  sent 11
BobLawblaw received 9  sent 0
lightfoot received 6 sent 0

Raja_MBZ received 5  sent 4
Elwar received 5 sent 0
Lambie Slayer received 5  sent 0
arewethereyet? received 5  sent 0

Torque received 4  sent 5
JimboToronto received 4 sent 4
nutildah received 4  sent 3
Totscha received 4  sent 1

Dunkelheit667 received 3  sent 5
JSRAW received 3 sent 4
Findingnemo received 3  sent 0
tranthidung received 3  sent 0

sirazimuth received 2  sent 5
jbreher received 2  sent 5
bitcoinPsycho received 2  sent 4
Ibian received 2 sent 1
Saint-loup received 2  sent 1
Pamoldar received 2  sent 0
akhjob received  2 sent 0
cAPSLOCK received 1  sent 6

bkbirge received 0  sent 2
ivomm received 0 sent 1
Cryptotourist received 0  sent 1
Hueristic received 0 sent 1
Bossian received 0  sent 1
hugeblack received 0  sent 1
btcbeliever received 0 sent 1
rs1x received 0  sent 1





Sowwy, but this record is incomplete  Grin



1130. Post 52390732 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: SuperTA on September 07, 2019, 09:14:28 PM
edit: done  Wink

Nope, but that's OK, we all know that Dabs is the champ as of now and mic is a balanced second.

Unrelated: watch out for Glupteba...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2019/09/07/serious-malware-warning-over-bitcoin-blockchain

Check out the third party ponderings of planB thesis:

https://twitter.com/100trillionUSD/status/1170319555807391745



1131. Post 52390939 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: SuperTA on September 07, 2019, 11:13:10 PM
WO September Statistics (Merits Received/Sent)

micgoossens received 45 sent 45
fillippone received 31 sent 12
SuperTA received 28 sent 27
makrospex received 27  sent 18
JayJuanGee  received 25  sent 39
LFC_Bitcoin received 21  sent 25

vroom received  19 sent 3
Globb0 received 18 sent 40
Icygreen received 18 sent 4
Toxic2040 received 18 sent 0
d_eddie received 17 sent 8
Last of the V8s received 17  sent 6
mindrust received 16  sent 20
xhomerx10  15 sent 4
VB1001 received 15 sent 13
Dabs received  14 sent 96  
Wilhelm received 14 sent 20
jojo69 received 14 sent 4

HairyMaclairy received 9  sent 11
Arriemoller received 9  sent 1
BobLawblaw received 9  sent 0
lightfoot received 6 sent 0
heslo received 6  sent 1

Raja_MBZ received 5  sent 4
Elwar received 5 sent 0
Lambie Slayer received 5  sent 0
Krubster received 5  sent 0
arewethereyet? received 5  sent 0

Torque received 4  sent 5
JimboToronto received 4 sent 4
nutildah received 4  sent 3
Negotiation received 4  sent 2
psycodad received 4  sent 1
Totscha received 4  sent 1
Dunkelheit667 received 3  sent 5
JSRAW received 3 sent 4
DaRude received 3 sent 2
Findingnemo received 3  sent 0
tranthidung received 3  sent 0
becoin received 3  sent 0

sirazimuth received 2  sent 5
jbreher received 2  sent 5
bitcoinPsycho received 2  sent 4
gentlemand 2  sent 4
DaRude received 2  sent 3
Ibian received 2 sent 1
Kylapoiss received  2 sent 1
Saint-loup received 2  sent 1
Pamoldar received 2  sent 0
nikauforest received 2  sent 0
GreatArkansas received 2  sent 0
STT received 2  sent 0
akhjob received  2 sent 0

vapourminer received 1 sent 9
cAPSLOCK received 1  sent 6
Ludwig Von received 1  sent 2
serveria.com received 1  sent 6
kingcolex received 1  sent 5
Wekkel received 1  sent 1
Majormax received 1 sent 1
smartcomet received 1  sent 1
hodl_2015 received 1  sent 0
Lucius received 1 sent 0
bitserve received 1 sent 0
Lauda received 1  sent 0
realr0ach received 1 sent 0
_javi_  received 1  sent 0
somac. received 1 sent 0


infofront 0  sent 4
P_Shep received 0  sent 3
bkbirge received 0  sent 2
ivomm received 0 sent 1
Cryptotourist received 0  sent 1
Phil_S received 0  sent 1
Hueristic received 0 sent 1
Bossian received 0  sent 1
hugeblack received 0  sent 1
btcbeliever received 0 sent 1
rs1x received 0  sent 1


Ok, now the list is updated. Here are all WO users (68 users) who posted at least 1x in WO this month. I didn't count users who didn't send or receive any merit in WO (September). I also included some users of the WO merit senders that i could find for this month, even if they didn't have any post here.

I give up...either you put me on ignore (fair enough) OR I am the ghost at your IP address.
Interesting...and somewhat bewildering.
A ghost in WO machine?



1132. Post 52391003 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: SuperTA on September 07, 2019, 11:32:38 PM
Oh, man i was sure i added you to the list, cuz i know i browsed through your profile when edited. I probably forgot to save. Sorry, i browsed through almost 200 profiles.
I updated.  Cheesy

Thanks, I was starting to ponder my own existence  Cool



1133. Post 52391032 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: SuperTA on September 07, 2019, 11:38:15 PM
I was also a little bit distracted. Because some of the users received a merit today and i had to add them and edit again.

Sure.
How about a nice chart (we all like charts)?
We need to one-up that planB fella and HM's fractal is lagging, albeit it would match at some point if we would be in the range for a while.



1134. Post 52391174 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on September 07, 2019, 11:52:44 PM
Golden cross on the weekly, as the 30 week (green) crosses the 100 week (orange) from below.  In 2015, this golden cross occurred during a period of extended consolidation.  In 2019, this cross occurs during a period of extended consolidation...


In 2015 30wk over 100wk in October, immediate rally from the relative flat into halving in June 2016

In 2019 30wk over 100wk in September...immediate rally from consolidation into halving in May 2020?
Duration would match...predicted price (by the end of may)...(805/320)X10550=$26540 (a bit too high?)
Anon predicted 29K in Feb and 56K in July (no graph)...I might believe it IF we hit 16K in October.



1135. Post 52392083 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: jbreher on September 08, 2019, 03:16:52 AM
How could evidence of personal identity have anything whatsoever to do with evidence of protocol change?

Quote
I'm not sure if you're trolling or trying to be serious.

Back at ya.

See any evidence of SegWit in the white paper? No?

Explicitly in front of your face. Willful dereliction of truthiness.

SegWit was indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol. Undeniably. There is really no way to argue otherwise.

I am pretty confident the white paper doesn’t say anything about Turing completeness, legally enforceable smart contracts, token protocols,  large data storage capability and all the other shit in Bitcoin SV marketing

Yet interestingly, all fully supported in the 0.1 version of the Bitcoin protocol.

By golly, sometimes you almost sound like you wrote it (or was involved at an early stage)...since everything afterwards was "crap".
If you did-much respect. Respect even if you did not and just being a bit cranky about later comers like PW re-writing/modifying a "perfect" code.
Does "perfect" code even exist?



1136. Post 52397835 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

to re-iterate two recent analysis of bitcoin statistics:

S/F by planB

https://twitter.com/100trillionUSD/status/1170701620751065095   #this is latest reiteration, see medium article for the original.

Power law by Harold Cristopher Burger:

https://medium.com/@hcburger1/bitcoins-natural-long-term-power-law-corridor-of-growth-649d0e9b3c94

TL;DR S/F predicts at least 55K at the halving with about 55-300K band; Power law predicts a maximum of about 120K by the end of 2021 and as low as 15k in the ensuing correction by the beginning of 2023. S/F is a bit more optimistic (no reason for the price to dip to 15K).



1137. Post 52399202 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

one day alt season,
gentlemen prefer bitcoin
shaken, not stirred



1138. Post 52419687 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

In early 2017 NOBODY expected almost 20K price by the end of the year...then it happened.
Now, everybody expects 50-400K...soonish.
Multiple people draw various graphs showing how it is 'inevitable' in 2021-2022. Plans are being drawn about what to do "when rich" in incredible detail.
Since the majority now believes in it, power law and S2F non-withstanding, I am starting to consider that it might not happen, or at least maybe not until 2024-2025. We shall see.



1139. Post 52438910 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: mindrust on September 12, 2019, 08:17:04 PM
Buckle up.

$100k in May/2020 is confirmed.
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BLX/sia9pOig-Bitcoin-Buckle-Up/

Quote
I am expecting Bitcoin to break all-time highs for the first time in advance of the Halving. The Stock to flow model which I discussed last week, which i have illustrated on the chart and i recommend that you review (see @100trillionUSD on twitter ) implies that Bitcoin will be worth around $100k from May 2020. It has been the best valuation model for Bitcoin to date.
$100k in May 2020 ? After the Halving it could be but not before  Grin

filbfilb doesn't agree.  Grin

filbfilb "Q4 2019 and Q1 2020 will blow your mind"

Nope..mind blown since 2013. I hope that he means in a good way, though.



1140. Post 52439538 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on September 12, 2019, 11:10:13 PM
https://www.wsj.com/articles/ecb-launches-major-stimulus-package-cuts-key-rate-11568289016 ECB printing presses at warp 8.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1172120964232093697

"European Central Bank, acting quickly, Cuts Rates 10 Basis Points. They are trying, and succeeding, in depreciating the Euro against the VERY strong Dollar, hurting U.S. exports.... And the Fed sits, and sits, and sits. They get paid to borrow money, while we are paying interest!"

We literally have a sitting US president crying on social media about how the ECB is printing money faster than the FED and winning the printer of the year competition. This jawboning of the FED is unprecedented and so far has worked very well to force them to bend to printer in chief's will. No doubt it will continue to work and the FED will cave over and over.

With all this money printing going on across the globe Im starting to really increase my projections of where the highs of this current Bull Cycle will take us. 100k is looking more like childs play and about 250k seems a more reasonable target to hit in the next 3 years. Big Macs will be about 10 bucks a pop by then, but who gives a damn, we will be rich af.


TLDR: ITS HAPPENING Cheesy



I think that instead of the 50 year and 100 year bonds and negative rates, bond market will turn around and "bite" them.
Perhaps, that tweet would be considered as a historical mark...that said, numbers already turned around and we had 2.4% "official" inflation in August.
Easing in these conditions is simply crazy, but let's see what happens..they would do it at least once in all likelyhood.
Boomers had their inflation peak in 1980-1982 when the cohort was 16-38 years old.
The Millennial cohort is there already, so it (much higher inflation) WILL happen soonish (within 5 years), IMHO.



1141. Post 52445984 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

GBTC premium is shrinking, currently "only" 27% or so.
Bitcoin ETF coming this year?



1142. Post 52448843 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on September 14, 2019, 01:44:20 AM
Ballet - The World’s First Multicurrency, Non-electronic Hardware Wallet.

Complete with scratch off private key.  Erm lol thanks Bobby Lee.  




https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/balletcrypto/ballet-cryptocurrency-hardware-wallet


Well, it has limitations, of course, but it is a bit more durable than a sheet of paper.
At the same time it weights less than 100g or a kilo gold bar and...you can load it into a phone and/or exchange wallet quickly.
It might become popular... or not.
NOT sure how they would prevent scamming by a dishonest employee (who has access) if the private key is already pre-printed.



1143. Post 52449163 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on September 14, 2019, 03:48:03 AM
Or maybe no one will EVER understand what the fuck bitcoin actually is.

Right, like that's really a private key underneath that scratcher?  Pretty fucking lazy scam if you ask me.

I don't think that they are complete morons.
There must be an explanation that makes it something that can work, at least theoretically.

Upon further check, there is a procedure, not sure how well it would work.
First, passphrase is printed, then covered, then encrypted key unlocked by the passphrase is randomly generated at the second location.
They claim that after wallet's private key (encrypted) is printed on the wallet, the data is destroyed (at their end).

TL;DR they generate the passphrase and an encrypted private key in two different geographic locations, then apply both (together or in sequence?) to the wallet printout/etching.



1144. Post 52453447 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: Hueristic on September 14, 2019, 03:19:05 PM
<snip>
Despite being Italian, fillippone is not a total cunt. Read his beginner's guide. No short cuts, read it all
<snip>

Oh thanks,
Not 100% cunt then.
Ok, that’s a start...I have room to improve (toward 0%)

Don't take it too hard... Everyone is a bit of a cunt Wink Except the French, they're massive cunts Cheesy

Well they are blocking Libra, give some credit them. Roll Eyes

France and Germany agree to block Facebook's Libra
Quote
PARIS (Reuters) - France and Germany have agreed to block Facebook’s Libra cryptocurrency, the French finance ministry said on Friday.

In a joint statement, the two governments affirmed that “no private entity can claim monetary power, which is inherent to the sovereignty of nations”.

French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said on Thursday that Facebook’s new cryptocurrency should not be allowed to operate in Europe while concerns persist about sovereignty and persistent financial risks.

And they did make microshaft change data collection practices IIRC so gotta give them credit for that.
Now if they would only bathe.

Or maybe no one will EVER understand what the fuck bitcoin actually is.

Right, like that's really a private key underneath that scratcher?  Pretty fucking lazy scam if you ask me.

I don't think that they are complete morons.
There must be an explanation that makes it something that can work, at least theoretically.

Upon further check, there is a procedure, not sure how well it would work.
First, passphrase is printed, then covered, then encrypted key unlocked by the passphrase is randomly generated at the second location.
They claim that after wallet's private key (encrypted) is printed on the wallet, the data is destroyed (at their end).

TL;DR they generate the passphrase and an encrypted private key in two different geographic locations, then apply both (together or in sequence?) to the wallet printout/etching.

Or we can just trust Zcashes trusted setup?
Sorry I couldn't hold back. Grin
I think my meds all kicked in at once this morning!

The only bankster I trust is myself because I am my own bank.  Grin

I'm not sure I trust myself now!
And If I ever become my own Lawyer I will have to kill myself. Cheesy


Hmm come to think of it I may have taken too many of the red pills this morning...

Meds that would make me humorous? Interesting.
Wifey is saying that I was the best husband ever when I was taking muscle relaxants for a sprained neck.
So, sometimes meds do something 'funny".
Those oldies who remember "Seinfeld"....."Stelllaaaa!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTi7VtrLL0k

I should take some, then yell "Zookoooooo!!!" (only Zcash aficionados would know).



1145. Post 52476104 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: BitBustah on September 17, 2019, 12:43:41 AM
Communism/ socialism has definitely gained popularity among the younger crowd.  Doesn't take a math genius to look at where all the new productivity gains are going to, heres a hint: its not going to hourly workers on the bottom the totem pole.  Wealth disparity is similar to what it was in the gilded age.

Wealth disparity is not the worst thing...historical forces that typically remove the disparity are much more disagreeable.
I am reading a book that systematically looked at what reduces inequality..and turns out only major wars and deadly pandemics (plaque in medieval Europe) were able to temporarily reduce inequality.

All societies "naturally'" trend toward increasing inequality in relatively peaceful conditions (over centuries).



1146. Post 52476212 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: legendster on September 17, 2019, 02:58:23 AM
4 is round.  Roll Eyes
]

4 is not round. 4 has a dick face.


Wealth disparity is not the worst thing...historical forces that typically remove the disparity are much more disagreeable.
I am reading a book that systematically looked at what reduces inequality..and turns out only major wars and deadly pandemics (plaque in medieval Europe) were able to temporarily reduce inequality.

All societies "naturally'" trend toward increasing inequality in relatively peaceful conditions (over centuries).



You seem to be indicating the mass pandemics / disasters that make the wealthy less wealthy and taking that as some kind of an equalizing force. The truth is, the real disparity between the rich and poor keeps on increasing. At least that was the case until the industrial age kicked in.

And now only thanks to the advent of internet and perhaps to some degrees, cryptos, the wealth that was accumulated by the rich for eons, has trickled down to the economically weaker sections of the population.

As far as I know, there are very few instances where the poor are given a solid way to claw out of poverty.



er...read the book (it looked over many centuries).
It does not give an answer to what is right and what is wrong and/or what is preferable and what it not.
It simply described what happened and when.
To your first statement: No, the disparity does not steadily increase. It increased for a few centuries, correct, then decreased from 1930-1940 (following WWI/WWII combo, separated by just 20 years) until 1975-1980, then steadily increased again until now.
To your second statement: yes, there not many instances where the poor move several strata in one generation.
https://www.amazon.com/Great-Leveler-Walter-Scheidel/dp/0691192677/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=the+great+leveler



1147. Post 52476300 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: legendster on September 17, 2019, 03:19:55 AM

Were you born with a silver spoon in your mouth sir?

lol

hardly


lol was it hardly stuffed in ?  Grin Grin

er...read the book (it looked over many centuries).
It does not give an answer to what is right and what is wrong and/or what is preferable and what it not.
It simply described what happened and when.
To your first statement: No, the disparity does not steadily increase. It increased for a few centuries, correct, then decreased between 1930-1940 (following WWI/WWII combo, separated by just 20 years) until 1975-1980, then steadily increased again until now.
To your second statement: yes, there not many instances where the poor move several strata in one generation.
https://www.amazon.com/Great-Leveler-Walter-Scheidel/dp/0691192677/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=the+great+leveler


Thanks I'll buy it by the end of the month. Ain't got spare cash to swat a fly atm.

Unless there's an online free / pdf / bootleg version of it somewhere, then you can let me know.

But let's not forget, its just one book from one author - and it is socio-economics, something that is very hard to predict, even when using past data as example.

Think of what happened during the black plague. I remember reading some charts about the economic impact it had on the wealthy vs poor, if I find it I'll stick it here.

Good example...in the aftermath real wages apparently increased at least twofold and inequality decreased.
Albeit, many millions died as the result of that disease.
Hence, going forward, it is reasonable to predict that nobody would like it if some historical factors would temporarily "solve" the inequality.



1148. Post 52484444 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on September 17, 2019, 12:06:26 PM
Communism/ socialism has definitely gained popularity among the younger crowd.  Doesn't take a math genius to look at where all the new productivity gains are going to, heres a hint: its not going to hourly workers on the bottom the totem pole.  Wealth disparity is similar to what it was in the gilded age.

Wealth disparity is not the worst thing...historical forces that typically remove the disparity are much more disagreeable.
I am reading a book that systematically looked at what reduces inequality..and turns out only major wars and deadly pandemics (plaque in medieval Europe) were able to temporarily reduce inequality.

All societies "naturally'" trend toward increasing inequality in relatively peaceful conditions (over centuries).


It's called pareto distribution.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcEWRykSgwE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4GMUamUjT8

Thanks, but we were mostly talking about dynamic changes in inequality.
You cannot explain change by referencing Pareto.
That principle does not explain why in some epoch Gini is 0.35 while in other 0.85
The book at least shows correlation with historical events and even then it is not a proof of the causation, however, it is at least a starting point.

Sidenote...who put a cap on bitcoin? Bizarro.



1149. Post 52484856 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.01h):

Quote from: Torque on September 17, 2019, 11:03:57 PM
Remember how revered Vinnie Lingham was in 2015/16 and how he squandered such reputation in early 2017? - but probably only after a decent number of folks got R3ckt  by selling because they actually relied on his bullshit early 2017 propositions that bitcoin was going below $500.

Yep, Vinny is one of many douchebags that came sweeping in during a Bitcoin bullrun and suddenly crowned himself a Bitcoin ProphetTM.

The fact that they have "followers" that hang on their every word makes me ill.



not Vinny...his days being a "prophet" are officially over since 2017.
I wonder if planB will encounter similar treatment (if price fails to deliver), but maybe not since his opinion was based on numbers, not some made up "influencer" stuff.



1150. Post 52514093 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Glad to read about people having good time, around here we were getting too much rain.
I bought some at around 9800, just nibbling.
Not sure if this would turn out a good trade or not (short term).

This got a lot of play on the interwebs, but I think that this guy, sadly, makes some good points:
https://youtu.be/3WclYu5l4G0




1151. Post 52519762 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: mindrust on September 21, 2019, 08:05:18 AM
It is like, the more poorer you are, the longer you stay poor.

The more richer you are, the shorter it takes to get even more richer.


Regarding the latter and btc...imagine being a whale and gaining or losing millions a day, almost every day. It could be exhausting.

Re being poor...read this...it sucks even more to be OLD and poor because you have very few options or no options.
The narrative of the next few decades for millions might be the story of going from high middle class to lower middle class or becoming poor.
Hopefully, bitcoin would rescue some.

https://getpocket.com/explore/item/falling



1152. Post 52521643 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on September 21, 2019, 09:14:54 PM
I think PlanB has a lot of security:



Although I think that 2020 will be a total explosion that the market will have, it will be full of many news, wherever its nature is good or bad, the market will have more demand, thus generating a sustained increase in price coupled with the bullish trend.

Non-stationary? Does he mean unstable?
I think that we should take the exact date with a grain of salt.
Besides, I am not sure why he was saying 50K before and now it became 100K.



1153. Post 52522097 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on September 22, 2019, 12:02:04 AM

It is like, the more poorer you are, the longer you stay poor.


bingo

I would not say so. I could go flat out broke today and I would still have skills, experience, character and a university degree. So compared to someone without any education or experience, relativistically speaking, I'd be back on my feet much sooner. $0 in my pockets would be a short-lived inconvenience, at most.

Indeed with your 80X skills.... thats indeed a short -lived inconvenience Cheesy

Er...if you lost most of your capital it would be difficult to gain it back even with leverage.
I almost zeroed one brokerage account (too much leverage during 2001-2002 internet crash).
It's balance is still relatively low even after I tried to rebuild it. That's why I don't use leverage anymore (got a lifetime lesson).
I am glad that most of my fiat capital is in non-margin retirement accounts plus home equity (which I also don't touch).
If I miss out by being non-leveraged, so be it.



1154. Post 52529049 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Bakkt is starting soon
Should we care much about it?
I do not think so



1155. Post 52529817 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on September 22, 2019, 06:45:15 PM
Bakkt is starting soon
Should we care much about it?
I do not think so


meh

BAKKT is a giant nothingburger



I did not know that V8 is into dildo sales/transportation...I kid, i kid



1156. Post 52530240 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on September 22, 2019, 08:09:51 PM
Who believes that history repeats itself?


Source:https://twitter.com/Weightlosspro14/status/1175860149682147330

Well, maybe I don't exactly do it, but we are on our way to that stage.

2017?
We are much earlier in a 4-year cycle (still 2015ish-like).
That said, I am maintaining some cash to buy at 8K or slightly below. 7.8-7.9K would be perfect.
If not, that's OK too. Cash is cash, lot's of ways to use it Wink



1157. Post 52531437 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: Lauda on September 23, 2019, 12:08:10 AM
Something is in the air.

bakkt traded a contract?



1158. Post 52531454 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: Lauda on September 23, 2019, 12:29:16 AM
Something is in the air.
bakkt traded a contract?
Maybe before the end of the year. Cheesy

....the end of the year arrived sooner than expected...
https://www.theice.com/products/72035464/Bakkt-Bitcoin-USD-Monthly-Futures-Contract/data?
That said, I doubt that many here would be trading on Bakkt.



1159. Post 52539711 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

To philosophize a little:

I don't understand joe-schmoe thinking..  0% on savings he is OK, -1% he is OK, maybe -5-10% later..he is still Ok.
This is true for both people with and without college education.
Debt through wazoo..still OK.
I am curious as to what might change this thinking IF anything.
Perhaps critical thinking is simply gone from the vast majority of the populace.
If so, we will all sink together.

BTW, for the record, I never thought of bakkt being anything significant, at least at first.




1160. Post 52548709 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

...I am a robot-screw "traffic lights" [they piss me off].

Re btc gyrations: IMHo, this was an interesting event.
I believe that it is connected to repo reinstitution.
Obviously, some biggie is in trouble.
In such 'batten down the hatches" situation, they sell everything they could, including btc.

Think about this: short term rates should be 1.75-2% (in US), yet nobody, but the fed wanted to provide liquidity unless you pay 8-10%.
This is crazy.

Although I bought before at higher, I am not going to deploy any cash right now. We might double dip or go lower (7.8-7.9).
Plus, I was busy working to catch 8K, which would have been OK (not much difference from 7.8-7.9).

Still, having bad vibes about the whole market.



1161. Post 52549190 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on September 24, 2019, 11:21:05 PM
Diamond bottom reversal pattern. This looks really nice. Credits: @BigCheds





Thanks. I would believe that we might be following this pattern if we rip off to 9300-9400 shortly.
Otherwise, it would be just a bounce.



1162. Post 52549333 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on September 25, 2019, 12:00:47 AM
smart money accumulation phase until next halving

I wish that instead of accumulating for two years, then having a two week-one month bull crescendo (2013 or 2017), we would have half and half (flat top). Too much to ask for? For example, if price dynamics literally followed S2F model, I would be very happy indeed.



1163. Post 52549555 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Quote from: jojo69 on September 25, 2019, 01:16:03 AM
Don't panic, keep #HODLing  Cool  

this_is_sparta.jpg

I have been hearing this for two years to keep on holding.
I wonder when the holders will be in a position to get benefit  Huh

Bitcoin is a mechanism to transfer wealth from the impatient to the patient.

well, as long as at that time I am not an impatient patient...with a cane.

I wonder where Bob is.
I think that he might have sold a tranche at 11-13K.



1164. Post 52559004 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.02h):

Outside of bitcoin, the explanation about repo-gate from already familiar C. Long:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/caitlinlong/2019/09/25/the-real-story-of-the-repo-market-meltdown-and-what-it-means-for-bitcoin/

Quote
For every US Treasury security outstanding, roughly three parties believe they own it. That’s right. Multiple parties report that they own the very same asset, when only one of them truly does.



1165. Post 52567789 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

A few points:

1. Mayer multiple is at 0.97 (close enough to 1 which might still indicates a bull market). In bear it could go as low as 0.5
https://mayermultiple.info/

2. S/F model current predicted value is $9016/8276
https://digitalik.net/btc/

All and all 8000 is kind of important for short-mid term direction.

Undecided on whether I should buy more here or not.

EDIT: let's play a game...what if 2019-2020 will have a similar config to two-humped 2013.
2013 (heavy metal rhythm): 12 to 250, down to 65, up to 1160 (within a year)
2019-2020 (something slower): 3100 to 13800, down to, say, 7.2K, up to 54-64K (in two years with half a volatility up and down)



1166. Post 52576403 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on September 27, 2019, 07:30:04 PM
CME Bitcoin Futures calendar. Trades don’t settle until Monday unfortunately so I don’t expect any rallies until after Monday. 



Is there actual evidence for this correlation? A genuine question.
At the moment, let me be doubtful.



1167. Post 52577414 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

For those not familiar with this aspect of TA: the bottoming of RSA does not, unfortunately, mean that the price stops going down. Check the RSI vs price in Dec 2018.

IMHO, going down another 500-800 points is equally possible to gaining 1K points.
BTW, unless we gain 8K from here, "anonymous" prediction for October (16K) would be wrong.



1168. Post 52587801 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on September 28, 2019, 10:55:43 PM
Seeing the PlanB tweet:



and reviewing "The Shorts" gives me some peace of mind that they are closing them, it can be an indication of a tenuous lateralization or market recovery.


I am not sure why would the green phase be so abortive in this bull run.
In 2016-2017 it lasted for more than a year.

In other words: I doubt that we are in the "orange" stage, but who knows.
Maybe, we are front-running the whole trend while we were behind the "true" trend in 2015-2016.



1169. Post 52588159 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on September 29, 2019, 12:40:38 AM
Comparing with previous years charts is now a more precarious business, because there is now a new pattern emerging, unlike most previous phases.

Would you like to back up your statement with charts and / or analysis?  I am always open to new points of view.

Worth noting the top was $13,880 and the low was  $7,734 so we have already had a 44% retracement.  

How about this scenario:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg52567789#msg52567789

Quote
2019-2020 (something slower): 3100 to 13800, down to, say, 7.2K, up to 54-64K (in two years with half a volatility up and down)

could be 7.7K instead of 7.2K, then $46-50K instead of 54-64K.
Re @majormax opinion...new pattern would not fit S2F.
Maybe S2F is incorrect, but why when bitcoin, gold and silver all match it (predicted values)?
S2F says: 50K-100K value after halving.



1170. Post 52596289 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on September 29, 2019, 05:50:19 PM


Would be the dumbest move ever...... if the bottom is in ?? You don’t wanna be left behind with some lame paper stacks Roll Eyes Grin

Especially since Gemini, for example, pre-credits your buy.
Essentially, you say "transfer X $$", then these $$ (up to a substantial sum) are available for btc purchase immediately, which is very convenient.



1171. Post 52598005 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: jojo69 on September 29, 2019, 07:56:08 PM
We are used to it. Going back to $5k or even $3k at this point doesn't mean anything to me other than "cheap coins". We already survived it once, we can do it again.


If we drop to $3,000 I will honestly put every single penny I have into bitcoin. I’m already way too heavily (for most people) invested in bitcoin but I will put my emergency fiat stash into bitcoin (which I said I’d never do).

I hope you would.  I hope I would too.  But from experience I suspect we would be sick to our stomachs with fear.  It is astonishingly contagious at such times.

Let us hope that we muster the fortitude to take advantage of opportunities when they come.

It's unlikely to happen...most people can't buy bottoms.
In 2014 I was buying as btc was declining, stopped at about $300, never bought at $150.
During 2018 decline I bought a little at 4K, did not buy any at 3K.
The problem with bottoms: you never know which one is the real one.
DCA or buying into rising market is the way to go for most people, IMHO.



1172. Post 52609368 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on September 30, 2019, 09:08:20 PM
Asians don’t give a fuck about the environment, all they care about is money.

Solar is now cheaper than coal and getting ever cheaper fast (hint: the fuel is free).

China gets a fuck ton of sunlight - it’s just blocked by the Asian Brown Cloud which is a result of burning coal.  Once they start to transition properly, they will get a positive feedback loop.  

More solar panels = less coal = less pollution = more solar radiation = more cost effective solar panels = more solar panels ....





As an added bonus the US could stop sending its troops to die for Saudi Arabia once we break away from oil dependency.  

solar would be great for me (lots of sun) if not for three reasons:

1. Cartel-like pricing here ($30K-50K per roof).
2. You cannot move your roof with you when you move.
3. Most important...Wretched HOA that is adamantly against solar. Those who don't know what HOA is, you are lucky.



1173. Post 52610632 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on September 30, 2019, 10:43:53 PM
I paid US$6,500 installed for a 8.5kw system which is a very large system including top quality panels and microinverters (not the cheaper string inverters).  You should be able to get a decent smaller system for less than US$3k installed.  I don't understand the pricing you have quoted.

If you size the system appropriately, you should be able to pay off the panels in 3 - 4 years.  Yes this requires staying in the same house for 3 - 4 years  Grin   After that it is free electricity.  But it also improves the resale value of your home.  

The power companies pay me about $4 per day for the solar I send to the grid.  My quarterly power bill is the power company paying me about $360.   Once your HOA realises they can make money off it, they will come around.  I put some panels in suboptimal positions so that I do not have any panels directly visible from the front but the system is deliberately oversized to cope with imperfect panel placement.  



Sorry, pal, in my neck of the woods the cost of solar is $2.81/w or $23.8K for a 8-9kw system and $28.1K for a 10kw system.
After tax rebates (one year later if 'someone' does not cancel them) it would be $16.7 or $19.7K respectively.
Plus, i would need to install new roof-another $12-14K.
Why would i need a small system, btw? I have needs Wink



1174. Post 52621688 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 01, 2019, 05:13:17 PM
I had that crazy (maybe wasn't so crazy) idea in the morning. I was about to put the rest of all my FIAT (6 figures) to BTC but then I didn't. Did another small $200 DCA instead.

Isn't that a sure bet? I mean who doesn't believe here that BTC won't make it above 9k again? Last time I said these lines it was somewhere between 4k and 6k, and I still didn't buy (I mean not all in), and it damn went above 9k indeed.

From 8k to 9k that was %12 sure gains. (It is %6 now)

From time to time, you come out with some real doozies, mindrust.

Based on my round about idea about the total size of your BTC investment, how  the fuck could you have anywhere close to 6 figures of fiat available?  You must be joking, right?  

Note: Remember this is the dollars/BTC thread so our general reference point is dollars, when we are referring to fiat.

Surely, I cannot tell you any kind of exact formula, but before anyone invests in BTC, they should have the rest of their life in order, and have their bigger bills paid and have their cashflow figured out for 6-18 months into the future.  Therefore, when considering what funds that they have available for BTC investment, they have the rest of those matters accounted.

Accordingly, you also said that you largely only buy BTC and HODL, you do not sell, so accounting for your own practices, you have also said that you DCA buy, buy on dips, and sometimes mistakenly FOMO buy.  Anynow, therefore, in the past 3 months, there have been all kinds of ongoing buying opportunities, so in that regard, I would be quite surprised if the value of your fiat should be anywhere close to the 20% or more of the value of your BTC.

Therefore, if you were to have 6 figures of fiat, then you would have $500k of value in BTC (which at current prices would be about 59 BTC  - that is $100k/.2  = $500).  

Something that you are saying is quite off, unless you had been largely contemplating and calculating some kind of gambling (overleveraging) move that would involve taking money from somewhere that you should not be taking it, in order to bet on bitcoin.  That does seem to be what you are contemplating/calculating.  In my thinking, those kinds of moves tend to be desperation moves, and not necessary in bitcoin, even if there could be some decent probabilities that they could pay off quite handsomely - even though personally, I rarely play those kinds of gambling approaches.**

**I will concede that from time to time (and historically), I have used zero interest credit card promotional moneys to increase my cashflow, and thereby buying bitcoin with a decent portion of that increased cashflow funds, so I am not completely immuned to a certain amount of leveraging/gambling that could have ended up going sour on me.

For me if someone has about 59btc (500K value) and 100K cash, going all the way and investing the rest of the cash in btc is a reckless move even when I think that btc is likely to appreciate.

Why? Because in this scenario 100K would increase your stash "only" 20% while eliminating any hint of diversification.
By no means I suggest investing the rest in alts. Keep cash (in $$). I don't know your geo location, so cannot rec. other currency or real estate. Some gold might be OK too, maybe split half and half (half cash half gold). I used to love stocks, reduced them lately.
Honestly, everything is so complicated right now, it is difficult to make the right decision (apart from bitcoin, which is solid).



1175. Post 52622259 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: jojo69 on October 02, 2019, 01:57:14 AM
I don't think this guy even comes close to warranting his own day.

He only just showed back up after how many years forsaking us?

"In your eyes forsaken me
In your thoughts forsaken me
In your heart forsaken, me oh..."

SOAD



1176. Post 52622327 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: Paashaas on October 02, 2019, 03:52:15 AM
$350,000 a year salary is not ''enough'' to be part of the middle class in expensive U.S cities.

https://i.imgur.com/DxzYube.png

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-budget-shows-how-a-350000-salary-barely-qualifies-as-middle-class-2019-09-11?link=sfmw_tw

I LOLed at $1560 insurance on a $1.8mil house.
bullsheeeet....made me think the rest is made up as well.
I am sure that they can make it on 200-250K/year (in those cities).



1177. Post 52655543 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

yes, chart looks bad and the whole 'premature fractal' looks even worse.
In fact, we started 2016-2017 bull run about 9 mo before halving.
Therefore, we are not ahead, but late by two months if you don't consider the move to 13.8K as a true "run".
The best we can count on here is slowly sloping upwards, hopefully exceeding the 200da MA.
If not, we will undergo a 'death cross' in one or two months.

My current thinking is that it is looking very bearish when it "should" have been progressively bullish (in this time zone vs halving)



1178. Post 52655717 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on October 05, 2019, 02:22:36 AM
According to the 2015 fractal, we could run sideways from here to May 2020.  It would be a bit boring but I wouldn’t consider it disastrous.  



A flat would be fine, but a quick downdraw to 5900 looks equally possible (numbers are taken from the chart, i am not predicting it).
BTW, from a historic perspective, 2015 (year before halving) had just 34% appreciation.
We started 2019 with about $3961, 34% on the top of this is roughly $5450.
Why I am comparing 2015-2016 with 2019-2020?
Because of the similar position vs halving (2016-July, 2020-end of May, provisionally).



1179. Post 52663291 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on October 05, 2019, 06:56:02 PM
Im not seeing any serious bargain buying at these levels and we never got a proper bounce to at least tease the Vegeta price levels.

I see no special reason why 8k will hold and expect a big drop soon as people give up on it.

IMO its gonna take a ton of volume and/or a serious green dildo to end the nasty downtrend from 14k. Sadly we have neither, but happily everyone should be moving money around in preparation to buy if low bargain prices (6-7k) do come our way.

I believe a quick journey into the 6k's in October with massive volume would end this mini bear once and for all and we could all focus on spreading our halvening and 100k300k propaganda.  Cheesy

A 6kish mini bear market bottom would be extremely bullish as it would be about double our major bear market bottom from Dec. 15, 2018.





I agree. Would I like it? Not in the slightest. It is just the theory of us being flat until may of 2020 strikes me as almost impossible.
It would be much better to reach halving rising from the lows vs being stale.



1180. Post 52663388 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on October 05, 2019, 07:19:48 PM
Bitcoiner will eventually be its own race as the vast wealth of Bitcoiners separates them from breeding with primitive cave dwelling nocoiners they will eventually evolve into a separate race and be unable to breed with nocoiners.

Our descendants will still be kind to nocoiners hopefully, but any offspring between a nocoiner and Bitcoiner will be sterile in the future due to large genetic differences. Its inevitable.

The best solution to stop nocoiners from going extinct will be large wildlife preserves where nocoiners can exist untouched by advanced society. We will build them banks and money printing tools to create an environment similar to their primitive ancestors.

I often mock nocoiners but it is sad to think of a once great people becoming an endangered species with no place to call home.



Taking it more seriously than I probably should, this would mean a neo-feudal society that would never progress to another level.
We (humans) are already in danger of splitting into subspecies due to CRISPR 'revolution'.
This is real and coming to many societies as baby-modding very soon (probably within one, maximum two generations).



1181. Post 52663700 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Quote from: jojo69 on October 05, 2019, 07:50:26 PM


Once pulled a 10 kilo silver bar from a well that the owner had obviously forgotten.... oh shit... I know where r0ach lives  Shocked

Good friend of mine was digging a footing for a new building on his land (rural Oregon) with his trackhoe, heard breaking glass.  He was all "goddamn it" having a dangerous mess to clean up, shut off the hoe, climbed down...he had got into 2 mason jars full of Morgans and a couple eagles lost by the previous owners...true story, I did a little trading with him.

Made me look re what is a "Morgan"...I know eagles, never learned anything about silver before.
Interesting re silver: planB was talking about it on one of the podcasts.
Apparently US govt had lots of silver, then sold EVERYTHING.
This is why silver's S/F is just about 3 vs gold's 58 with btc at 23.2-25.4 (going to around 50 at halving).



1182. Post 52664010 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

I wonder if in 100 years there will be Mayer and Winkelvoss land empires in US:

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-largest-landowners-in-us/

maybe someone currently at WO too... in time.



1183. Post 52666331 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.03h):

Digital yuan rumor on Keizer report...apparently China will be announcing it on 11/11.
https://youtu.be/F6aengR6fWk?t=1501

I have no idea what would be the difference from the 'regular' yuan.
After all, all money transfers are already somewhat digital.
Maybe nothingburger...or not.



1184. Post 52672944 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: jbreher on October 06, 2019, 04:23:14 PM
We (humans) are already in danger of splitting into subspecies due to CRISPR 'revolution'.

'danger'?

"danger" in the same sense as " the danger of the unknown".

A different situation in comparison with the current one.
No random combinations leading to greatness, no Ramanujan, no "spontaneous" Einstein.
Basically, genetically superior moneyed class and the base.
Neo-feudalizm that is maintained not just by money, but also by genetics.
There would be no turning back and/or develop another type of society.



1185. Post 52673400 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on October 06, 2019, 05:03:45 PM
The word species doesn’t mean what you seem to think it means

I do, but not 100% sure that you do, however.

one major characteristic: an inability to produce fertile offspring from mating [when it is even possible] with a representative of another species.

A few CRSPR mods and this could be accomplished.
Even without/before this: imagine parental pressure on a child who wants to marry the "unmodded" individual.
Such societal restrictions (on a top of even small CRSPR mods) might result in eventual separation of Homo sapiens into subspecies.
We are not resistant to evolutionary forces based on sociology (even without programming in a complete biological distinction).
That is, of course, if CRSPR will be applied on a large enough scale.

Unfortunately, I don't see how it would not happen within relatively short time frame since moneyed classes would be in favor, presumably.



1186. Post 52673931 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: vapourminer on October 06, 2019, 05:56:28 PM
I only fear one thing in life & it’s cancer. I’ve had a drink myself so I don’t mind about being honest myself. I’ve had two scares this year -

cancer is truly nasty thats for sure. some cases can be controlled into remission but its never guaranteed.

my greatest fear is brain deterioration (alzheimers, dementia, things like that) and currently there is no way to prevent, slow down, or cure those.

i can lose large pieces of my body to whatever and as long as my brain is functioning at more or less normal level (for me) im good with missing parts. i can adapt as long as my brain is doing its job in its usual sloppy fashion.

you can replace a lot of organ systems but obviously the brain is not on that list.

i have seen too many people who suffer one or the other of those and how truly miserable that can be to the patient as well as family.

i have a plan to prevent that long spiral downward if my brains craps out. i plan build an extremely complicated puzzle device that takes, say, one hour of undivided attention and and a reasonable amount of logic and such to solve, thereby resetting the counter. it would need to be solved every (say) two weeks, and wrong answers are ignored with no penalty. it would have something like a several month grace period, even with wrong answers. to take into the account other, temporary mental issues. so, basically a dead mans switch that would somehow cause me to expire (with no danger to others) while still having a small shred of dignity and freewill. this would take much careful vetting of course, as well as a way to expire myself (suicide is for cowards, but i figure dying because you could not solve a logic problem is ok... well i think so anyway).

so.. if my brain is going to betray me.. well if i cant trust my own brain at that point, i need to set something up before my brain has a chance to cause a huge amount of suffering and inconvenience for caregivers.





Interesting...I am not sure that it needs to be a complicated puzzle since you should expect some mild decline in brain capacity.
What's wrong with doing sudoku, word games, etc.?
There is a guy in health field (https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/10/why-i-hope-to-die-at-75/379329/ ) who wrote a treatise about how he will stop taking care of his body upon turning 75 due to his thinking about a perceived lack of sharpness. Some professions (teaching, science, medicine, artistry, etc.) seem to be preserving mental capacities of participants way into late seventies, early eighties. Personally, I think that the key is to be interested in new things.



1187. Post 52674244 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: golden-dragon on October 06, 2019, 06:33:20 PM

the only way is up..



https://twitter.com/galaxyBTC/status/1180896177002291203

Just one possible chart among a large number of unknowns.
It would be nice, though.
What's the trigger for such move?
Brexit?

BTW, why btc looks so shitty on US/EU exchanges vs binance? There is more than $150 price difference.



1188. Post 52674536 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: JL0 on October 06, 2019, 07:10:27 PM
50 SMA is falling, but the 200 SMA is rising so just wait and be ready  Grin
Cross is incoming

like we didn't know
this already, trade and lose
suggestion dismissed



1189. Post 52675132 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on October 06, 2019, 07:29:17 PM
Damn Lambie was wrong 7995

Nope, read my post again Goose, I said we are going somewhere between 6-7k in October.

$6500 would be roughly 0.8 Mayer's multiple.
Historically, it would be a good place to buy, but no guarantees.



1190. Post 52686383 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on October 07, 2019, 06:06:56 PM
*incoherent ranting*


Yes.  About a year and a half ago, pretty much Hairy admitted that he was relying on fractal comparisons, and surely I have been vocally critical of such fractal comparison reliances, even though they have largely been playing out - with, of course, some upwards deviation with our 3.5x outburst from April 1 to end of June, and currently what appears to be a return to the mean of the fractal... So whatever the fuck lack of comparison seems to still be working out in a very comparable way.


So, maybe there has never been such a system in the world, but who fucking cares?  It still has worked out quite well in bitcoin for a lot of us BTC HODLers and accumulators to be continuing to become richie and to increase our richness through the fact that BTC prices continue to go up in the longer term.. just like the silly fucking ass fractal comparisons seem to suggest.  Go figure?  

Now you roach, on the other hand, have had some mediocre gold price appreciation during this calendar year (which has gotten you all excited, and even a bit more cocky than usual), and maybe you should be taking advantage of that mediocre gold price appreciation and getting into a real future asset.. ie bitcoin?  dumb ass.

There is no TA comparison in legacy financial markets because there is no comparable asset in legacy financial markets.

There is no financial instrument with fixed supply to be paid out over a century where the rate of supply halves every four years as regular as the Olympics.  It is this regular drum beat that causes us to pound out the same patterns.  Yes the drum beat will get weaker over time as inflation falls away, but it is strong now and will remain strong through this halvening and likely the next.

I have spoken to investment bankers at Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan who do TA on Bitcoin and in their arrogance they have never heard of the halvening.   So they can’t plan for it and they can’t front run it.   Even among retail investors, most of whom are focused on chasing shitcoins, they have no understanding of how the entire market is run by the drum beat of Daddy Bitcoin.

We sit in a privileged position because we live and breathe this every day.  But don’t make the mistake of extrapolating our knowledge and experience to the broader market.  



I agree that we have halving knowledge, but here comes the test...
If this time around halving and S/F extension to above 50 (closer to gold) would produce 55K-90K prices (conservatively), THEN our position was truly privileged. If not, then it is still mostly random fluctuation. I hope for the former and I am keenly aware of the latter.

Most of you were probably not around the Internet bubble 1. In 1997-2000 it was simply great. No matter what you bought (out of major and even minor Internet stocks), you were doing great. Then came B2B Internet stocks and early biotechs (with no product) that inflated to tens of billions almost from the get go.
Anyone investing in these stocks has seen only a tremendous bull.
Then it all crashed (even AMZN -from $100 to $5).
If you look at the charts of the Internet stocks during 1997-2000, they looked peachy and projected fundamentals (at least of  AMZN, EBAy, etc) were even better than expected. Still everything crashed.

Granted, those stocks did not have a 'halving engine' beneath them and maybe this would be a critical factor.
However, litecoin (not bitcoin) has similar halving process, yet it crashed very badly AFTER undergoing halving recently (albeit it was rising toward halving). Maybe it does not count because it is a minor coin, but arguing that halving works only on one entity is presumptuous.

TL;DR The upcoming halving would be a huge test of the 'halving engine' and S/F guideline idea. Fingers crossed.



1191. Post 52687294 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 07, 2019, 10:42:18 PM
*incoherent ranting*


Yes.  About a year and a half ago, pretty much Hairy admitted that he was relying on fractal comparisons, and surely I have been vocally critical of such fractal comparison reliances, even though they have largely been playing out - with, of course, some upwards deviation with our 3.5x outburst from April 1 to end of June, and currently what appears to be a return to the mean of the fractal... So whatever the fuck lack of comparison seems to still be working out in a very comparable way.


So, maybe there has never been such a system in the world, but who fucking cares?  It still has worked out quite well in bitcoin for a lot of us BTC HODLers and accumulators to be continuing to become richie and to increase our richness through the fact that BTC prices continue to go up in the longer term.. just like the silly fucking ass fractal comparisons seem to suggest.  Go figure?  

Now you roach, on the other hand, have had some mediocre gold price appreciation during this calendar year (which has gotten you all excited, and even a bit more cocky than usual), and maybe you should be taking advantage of that mediocre gold price appreciation and getting into a real future asset.. ie bitcoin?  dumb ass.

There is no TA comparison in legacy financial markets because there is no comparable asset in legacy financial markets.

There is no financial instrument with fixed supply to be paid out over a century where the rate of supply halves every four years as regular as the Olympics.  It is this regular drum beat that causes us to pound out the same patterns.  Yes the drum beat will get weaker over time as inflation falls away, but it is strong now and will remain strong through this halvening and likely the next.

I have spoken to investment bankers at Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan who do TA on Bitcoin and in their arrogance they have never heard of the halvening.   So they can’t plan for it and they can’t front run it.   Even among retail investors, most of whom are focused on chasing shitcoins, they have no understanding of how the entire market is run by the drum beat of Daddy Bitcoin.

We sit in a privileged position because we live and breathe this every day.  But don’t make the mistake of extrapolating our knowledge and experience to the broader market.  



I agree that we have halving knowledge, but here comes the test...
If this time around halving and S/F extension to above 50 (closer to gold) would produce 55K-90K prices (conservatively), THEN our position was truly privileged. If not, then it is still mostly random fluctuation. I hope for the former and I am keenly aware of the latter.

Most of you were probably not around the Internet bubble 1. In 1997-2000 it was simply great. No matter what you bought (out of major and even minor Internet stocks), you were doing great. Then came B2B Internet stocks and early biotechs (with no product) that inflated to tens of billions almost from the get go.
Anyone investing in these stocks has seen only a tremendous bull.
Then it all crashed (even AMZN -from $100 to $5).
If you look at the charts of the Internet stocks during 1997-2000, they looked peachy and projected fundamentals (at least of  AMZN, EBAy, etc) were even better than expected. Still everything crashed.

Granted, those stocks did not have a 'halving engine' beneath them and maybe this would be a critical factor.
However, litecoin (not bitcoin) has similar halving process, yet it crashed very badly AFTER undergoing halving recently (albeit it was rising toward halving). Maybe it does not count because it is a minor coin, but arguing that halving works only on one entity is presumptuous.

TL;DR The upcoming halving would be a huge test of the 'halving engine' and S/F guideline idea. Fingers crossed.

Gosh Biodom.   Shocked Shocked Shocked

You have a tendency to be overly skeptical regarding the bullish case for bitcoin, and even the realistic case regarding what is really going on here, in bitcoinlandia.  

If I did not see you on a regular basis in this here thread (and tending to NOT spout any nonsense about shitcoins), I would speculate that you are susceptible to getting lured into some altcoin or some other nonsense.    Huh     Huh

LOL... i might get lured into selling a bit of btc and buying a beemer, but not into buying altcoins with btc proceeds.
That would be stupid, all things considered.
You can call me long term bullish. I was bearish when we went down hard from 13.8 and sold a  little around there (12-13K interval) while predicting 8k, which you, incidentally, poo-pooed repeatedly. Who was right in that very instance? A rhetorical question.

Now, my thesis is that 6-12 mo after halving planB's idea would be tested. It would either succeed or fail.
As a scientist, I am used to the falsification of ideas as an essential method of finding the truth (strictly speaking, rather falsification of the hypothesis).
At the moment, I am skeptical that he is right. Why? Because no other market behaves in a predictable fashion.
However, the chance of planB success is non-zero and I root for him. My portfolio would be thankful as well.



1192. Post 52687445 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on October 08, 2019, 02:48:46 AM
*incoherent ranting*


Yes.  About a year and a half ago, pretty much Hairy admitted that he was relying on fractal comparisons, and surely I have been vocally critical of such fractal comparison reliances, even though they have largely been playing out - with, of course, some upwards deviation with our 3.5x outburst from April 1 to end of June, and currently what appears to be a return to the mean of the fractal... So whatever the fuck lack of comparison seems to still be working out in a very comparable way.


So, maybe there has never been such a system in the world, but who fucking cares?  It still has worked out quite well in bitcoin for a lot of us BTC HODLers and accumulators to be continuing to become richie and to increase our richness through the fact that BTC prices continue to go up in the longer term.. just like the silly fucking ass fractal comparisons seem to suggest.  Go figure?  

Now you roach, on the other hand, have had some mediocre gold price appreciation during this calendar year (which has gotten you all excited, and even a bit more cocky than usual), and maybe you should be taking advantage of that mediocre gold price appreciation and getting into a real future asset.. ie bitcoin?  dumb ass.

There is no TA comparison in legacy financial markets because there is no comparable asset in legacy financial markets.

There is no financial instrument with fixed supply to be paid out over a century where the rate of supply halves every four years as regular as the Olympics.  It is this regular drum beat that causes us to pound out the same patterns.  Yes the drum beat will get weaker over time as inflation falls away, but it is strong now and will remain strong through this halvening and likely the next.

I have spoken to investment bankers at Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan who do TA on Bitcoin and in their arrogance they have never heard of the halvening.   So they can’t plan for it and they can’t front run it.   Even among retail investors, most of whom are focused on chasing shitcoins, they have no understanding of how the entire market is run by the drum beat of Daddy Bitcoin.

We sit in a privileged position because we live and breathe this every day.  But don’t make the mistake of extrapolating our knowledge and experience to the broader market.  



I agree that we have halving knowledge, but here comes the test...
If this time around halving and S/F extension to above 50 (closer to gold) would produce 55K-90K prices (conservatively), THEN our position was truly privileged. If not, then it is still mostly random fluctuation. I hope for the former and I am keenly aware of the latter.

Most of you were probably not around the Internet bubble 1. In 1997-2000 it was simply great. No matter what you bought (out of major and even minor Internet stocks), you were doing great. Then came B2B Internet stocks and early biotechs (with no product) that inflated to tens of billions almost from the get go.
Anyone investing in these stocks has seen only a tremendous bull.
Then it all crashed (even AMZN -from $100 to $5).
If you look at the charts of the Internet stocks during 1997-2000, they looked peachy and projected fundamentals (at least of  AMZN, EBAy, etc) were even better than expected. Still everything crashed.

Granted, those stocks did not have a 'halving engine' beneath them and maybe this would be a critical factor.
However, litecoin (not bitcoin) has similar halving process, yet it crashed very badly AFTER undergoing halving recently (albeit it was rising toward halving). Maybe it does not count because it is a minor coin, but arguing that halving works only on one entity is presumptuous.

TL;DR The upcoming halving would be a huge test of the 'halving engine' and S/F guideline idea. Fingers crossed.

Gosh Biodom.   Shocked Shocked Shocked

You have a tendency to be overly skeptical regarding the bullish case for bitcoin, and even the realistic case regarding what is really going on here, in bitcoinlandia.  

If I did not see you on a regular basis in this here thread (and tending to NOT spout any nonsense about shitcoins), I would speculate that you are susceptible to getting lured into some altcoin or some other nonsense.    Huh     Huh

LOL... i might get lured into selling a bit of btc and buying a beemer, but not into buying altcoins with btc proceeds.
That would be stupid, all things considered.
You can call me long term bullish. I was bearish when we went down hard from 13.8 and sold a  little around there (12-13K interval) while predicting 8k, which you, incidentally, poo-pooed repeatedly. Who was right in that very instance? A rhetorical question.

Now, my thesis is that 6-12 mo after halving planB's idea would be tested. It would either succeed or fail.
As a scientist, I am used to the falsification of ideas as an essential method of finding the truth (strictly speaking, rather falsification of the hypothesis).
At the moment, I am skeptical that he is right. Why? Because no other market behaves in a predictable fashion.
However, the chance of planB success is non-zero and I root for him. My portfolio would be thankful as well.

It is entirely predictable that the SP500 will be higher than it is today in 20 years time.  

All rational markets are predictable given a long enough time frame.

Given, we can argue all day long whether Bitcoin is a rational market.  

No, it is not (SP500). SP500 1 Jan 1929 - 24.86, SP500 1949-15.36 (61.7% of 20 year earlier value).
Nikkei- 38916 in 1989 (30 years ago!), 21597 now (55.5% of the value thirty years ago).
If anything, my favorite scenario would be Dow going to 39K (a la Nikkei), then down by 50-60% and fluctuating around there for 10-15 years.
It might happen, but I am not betting on it...I am mostly long equities in a smaller than previously % of the portfolio.



1193. Post 52696864 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

btc dominance at 66.6% (spooky!)
some correction from 71.4



1194. Post 52729493 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Interesting...SEC files emergency relief against Telegram token (TON).
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2019-212
Someone already invested 1.7 bil.
I wonder how this would progress.



1195. Post 52729834 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Tone Vays...this is getting progressively more tiring.
Where does he get all this nonsense? From connecting a couple of dots with a straight line?
In addition, I don't believe that he is going to sell his apartment and buy btc at 2600. It wouldn't make any sense.
Vays is bitcoin's Robert Prechter.



1196. Post 52729934 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: OROBTC on October 12, 2019, 12:12:05 AM
Number of #Bitcoin addresses holding more than 1000 $BTC 👀

via Imgflip Meme Generator

https://twitter.com/glassnode/status/1182674900496146432?s=21


Maybe I'm reading the graph wrong, but it looks to me like ~10,500 addresses holding 1000 BTC (or more) would mean that those addresses (not wallets w/ more than one address) would own:

10,500 addys * 1000 BTC = BTC10,500,000

Or well over 50% of the BTC mined so far...

Maybe it's wallets holding over $1000 worth of BTC?  The twitter link sort of suggests that too.

No, redline is the number of addresses (values on on the left, about 2100 addr), grey line-price of btc (value on the right in log scale).
2100X1000=at least 2.1 mil btc (in reality, much more since some addresses have MUCH more than 1000 btc).



1197. Post 52730019 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: Searing on October 12, 2019, 12:24:27 AM
Interesting...SEC files emergency relief against Telegram token (TON).
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2019-212
Someone already invested 1.7 bil.
I wonder how this would progress.


This is the USA and the SEC. Let's see. $1.7 Billion dollars. (grabs calculator for his SEC guess on fine)

I bet they settle it for $210 million and then let it proceed. Hey, it is how we roll in the USA and the SEC.

Pay us some meagre fines and voila you are off the hook.

https://www.engadget.com/2019/10/01/sec-fines-block-one-24m-unregistered-ico-worth-billions/

See SEC fines Block.one above $24 million USD only. The fact is they made billions. It will be the same for Telegram token TON.

Rinse/Wash/Repeat. Money talks/bullshit walks. It is how the SEC rolls in the USA.

Brad

Right.
In the mean time there is a draft of new 140 form where question of "virtual currency' is on line 1.
https://www.accountingtoday.com/news/irs-revises-form-1040-schedule-to-ask-about-cryptocurrency
how important are these miniscule taxable proceeds are?
Apparently, important enough to put them on line one.
Realistically, though, we have a 20 tril economy and crypto income and cap gains has got to be a pimple on elephant's skin (so far)



1198. Post 52730362 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: jbreher on October 12, 2019, 02:12:01 AM
This is from their FAQ:

"When you receive cryptocurrency from an airdrop following a hard fork, you will have ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the new cryptocurrency when it is received, which is when the transaction is recorded on the distributed ledger, provided you have dominion and control over the cryptocurrency so that you can transfer, sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of the cryptocurrency."

If you never split the new coins from the base chain, there is no tx recorded on the distributed ledger. And therefore, by definition, those coins have not been received.

Brilliant.

However, the way they did it you would have income first (after performing the splitting txn) and then cap gains on the price difference when sell/exchange.



1199. Post 52730455 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 12, 2019, 02:44:09 AM
Has anyone else noticed the severe drop in liquidity on coinbase pro for BTC/USD?? Order book averaged about $50 million+ in buys all the way down to $2200 up until yesterday. Within the last 24 hours it dropped from $50 million down to barely over $10 million. What happened here?

You posted the same thing yesterday. Order books are irrelevant - whales use APIs.  

Didn't Coinbase pro have a recent increase in their trading fees too? That could possibly have been a partial explanation, too, no?

yes, that's what happens when you increased fees threefold while competitors did not.
https://youtu.be/p79lKeQMBPc?t=92



1200. Post 52731071 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

IMHO, you fellas should ease up on jbreher.
He is NOT R. Ver or craig W, clearly.  
An engineer and/or scientist, no doubt.

I root for the proper btc, but the jury is still open on whether LN would behave when we stress it with 100s of millions if not billions of users.
BTW, personally, i like second layer solutions like LN more, but I am perfectly willing to listen to the opposite opinion.
Y'all espouse 'political correctness' here, which i never cared much about.

Besides, anyone who did not split their btc yet carries expected future bch and bsv coins within.
I don't think that for btc to succeed, forks have to zero-out.
Mostly, I just not follow them as closely as btc, but time comes, I would like to collect the proceeds if there would be any.




1201. Post 52731368 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: JSRAW on October 12, 2019, 06:00:40 AM
Fucking Erdogan man...lame
nicked

[A reaction to china coin launch in a few days/weeks?]

US is about to experience yet another "sputnik" moment.
In the 60ies it was a smart response: NASA, lunar missions, science education in schools.
What now? I am not confident at all that a response would be intelligent this time around.



1202. Post 52736267 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

BS goals or worthy endeavor (FI/RE)?

https://nypost.com/2019/10/08/inside-the-strange-secretive-lives-of-rich-millennial-cheapskates/

I think that peeps on WO with significant coinage might want to spare some for a better living.
Otherwise, all that sat stacking is for what?
Frugality has it's pluses, but there are also a lot of minuses.
Essentially, you would have a bunch of money when you are old, however, when you are old, your plans are typically limited.




1203. Post 52736356 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 12, 2019, 04:49:33 PM
Fuck politics get back to Bitcoin, why don't we go up? I was told to enjoy $16k in October. Where is it? 18 days left to November,

Who the fuck told you that?  You want me to beat them up for you?

Or maybe you are the one who deserves a beating for relying on promises (and then propagating such nonsensical promises) when anyone with any kind of scintilla of common sense in bitcoinlandia should realize that there is no such thing as a promise in bitcoin, especially when it comes to short-term price movements.  AmiNOTrite?



Asuka needs get her shit back together as soon as possible. People's dreams are on the line here. All those lambos, hoos, parties, yachts... Get back to work Asuka enough lollygagging

Who is Asuka?  Has she participated in this thread or been quoted in this thread in any kind of memorially significant way?

some anon on reddit and yes, he/she was quoted repeatedly.
All these predictions always fall apart sooner or later, even the one from the "time traveler", which was quite successful, is about to kick the bucket at the EOY.
The "citadels" idea might persist, though.



1204. Post 52738984 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

This board spends inordinate amount of time and effort talking about forks.
Seriously, who cares much about it? They came and now largely gone.

There are many other really relevant topics.
One, for example, is why govvies are so gung ho against Libra and telegram?
I am quite curious about this. Will this spillover to btc? Is is difficult not to expect some "regulatory" efforts by next summer at the latest.
How will bitcoin respond?



1205. Post 52739146 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 12, 2019, 11:58:30 PM
Fuck politics get back to Bitcoin, why don't we go up? I was told to enjoy $16k in October. Where is it? 18 days left to November,

Who the fuck told you that?  You want me to beat them up for you?

Or maybe you are the one who deserves a beating for relying on promises (and then propagating such nonsensical promises) when anyone with any kind of scintilla of common sense in bitcoinlandia should realize that there is no such thing as a promise in bitcoin, especially when it comes to short-term price movements.  AmiNOTrite?



Asuka needs get her shit back together as soon as possible. People's dreams are on the line here. All those lambos, hoos, parties, yachts... Get back to work Asuka enough lollygagging

Who is Asuka?  Has she participated in this thread or been quoted in this thread in any kind of memorially significant way?

some anon on reddit and yes, he/she was quoted repeatedly.
All these predictions always fall apart sooner or later, even the one from the "time traveler", which was quite successful, is about to kick the bucket at the EOY.
The "citadels" idea might persist, though.


Hm?  I don't recall seeing those predictions in this thread, so I suppose it is not memorial for me.  Perhaps, I am not reading this thread (and retaining) as thoroughly as I should be... for some strange reason.

Yes, it was discussed here and you even merited this.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg52289353#msg52289353

the only thing is i am not sure if that Anon is the one prior poster related to. maybe not. In any case, this is the only viral prediction on reddit that i was aware of.



1206. Post 52747748 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: Searing on October 13, 2019, 05:02:54 PM


along with their claim of 5nm chips in spring and 3nm chips in development.




We shall see...i am skeptical, but they might deliver something by next summer, which means that current buyers would be largely obliterated.
Bitmain is killing the golden goose aka cutting the branch they are sitting on themselves.
It only takes one large loss to drop out of the mining game alltogether.



1207. Post 52747833 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.04h):

Quote from: makrospex on October 13, 2019, 05:11:42 PM

what's that movie, mic?
Looks like fun.

A bit older now, but it’s from
Blue streak....

1999. Like "mystery men", which i missed completely and just watched two weeks ago.
Blue streak is on my to-view-list now, thanks  Grin


what's the meaning of those teeth?



1208. Post 52792871 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on October 17, 2019, 08:04:45 PM
Imagine quitting chart-watching. fuck now that would be hard

I already quit chart-watching...well, almost..I watch WO instead.

That said, is there something to watch?
A flatline city.

My work week is done, so I celebrate with a nice sushi w/a beer (no pics).



1209. Post 52793028 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Interesting...Lump sum beats DCA about 68% of the time.

https://shitcoin.ninja/post/2019/10/comparing-bitcoin-investment-strategies/

Quote
We created a simple trial comparing lump sum to the strategy of investing in the same amount monthly over a year, and found that lump sum still won ~67.9% of the time. Even the arbitrarily reduced dataset showed that Lump Sum beats DCA 60.8% of time.



1210. Post 52793528 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on October 17, 2019, 10:56:53 PM
ooooooooooooooooooooh
no idea



Terminator

You keep to amaze .....

Really waiting for a true 3th one instead of all the sh*tshows

I might believe that it is good....sometime after Nov 1.



1211. Post 52793655 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on October 17, 2019, 11:11:03 PM
ooooooooooooooooooooh
no idea



Terminator

You keep to amaze .....

Really waiting for a true 3th one instead of all the sh*tshows

I might believe that it is good....sometime after Nov 1.

Eeeeuhm sometime next week Cheesy

ORLY...it is on Nov 1 in US theaters.
An alternative future?



1212. Post 52801709 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 18, 2019, 06:36:18 AM
Interesting...Lump sum beats DCA about 68% of the time.

https://shitcoin.ninja/post/2019/10/comparing-bitcoin-investment-strategies/

Quote
We created a simple trial comparing lump sum to the strategy of investing in the same amount monthly over a year, and found that lump sum still won ~67.9% of the time. Even the arbitrarily reduced dataset showed that Lump Sum beats DCA 60.8% of time.

DCA is still way the fuck more practical for the vast majority of peeps.

Most of us already know that a large number of peeps cannot even come up with a few hundred dollars for an emergency.

Therefore it is way the fuck better for them to invest regularly, as if they were buying a coffee or an extra bag of groceries or whatever and then just forget about it for 5 years or more.

Obviously, if someone doesn't have a lump sum, then they cannot invest a lump sum.
They simply analyzed all possible scenarios.
One conclusion could be that in life it is better to have an investable lump sum than DCA as it simply opens up more investing options, clearly.
Heck, one can even borrow such a lump sum-a risky path that I don't condone, but in some situations it works. I used it a few times, more than a decade ago, when market was strong and you only paid 0-2% to borrow. Now cc companies boosted the borrowing % to 4-5% and it does not make sense anymore. Getting personal loans from the bank is possible, but you need to have a cash flow present to justify such loan.



1213. Post 52804751 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: rolling on October 19, 2019, 02:41:13 AM
I sure hope Satoshi didn't blow it with the curve he chose.

Fees are going to have to, umm, increase, to incentivize miners.

No need to incetivize miners. It's a self-regulating system. If they can't make enough money, they will drop out which makes the remaining miners more profitable.

Also, fees may increase as well and small transactions will be squeezed out. This is ok. There is no reason to use the worlds most secure transaction network to buy a cup of coffee.

It remains to be seen that this would work long term, although so far the adjustment of hashing to price fluctuation was impressive.
I worry a bit about mining concentration in the hands of the vertically integrated entities, like the recent P. Thiel venture.
It might cause further centralization and such centralization might cause undue re-consideration of bitcoin's rules (in time).



1214. Post 52804795 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: rolling on October 19, 2019, 02:58:18 AM
I sure hope Satoshi didn't blow it with the curve he chose.

Fees are going to have to, umm, increase, to incentivize miners.

No need to incetivize miners. It's a self-regulating system. If they can't make enough money, they will drop out which makes the remaining miners more profitable.

Also, fees may increase as well and small transactions will be squeezed out. This is ok. There is no reason to use the worlds most secure transaction network to buy a cup of coffee.

It remains to be seen that this would work long term, although so far the adjustment of hashing to price fluctuation was impressive.
I worry a bit about mining concentration in the hands of the vertically integrated entities, like the recent P. Thiel venture.
It might cause further centralization and such centralization might cause undue re-consideration of bitcoin's rules (in time).

If bitcoin is still mined worldwide by then, I doubt any changes to the rules would be possible. It would require consensus and the world I know can't get consensus on any topic. Therefore, the only way to change the rules is to fork off. That could happen many more times and the value will follow if there is a market for it.

I think big daddy Bitcoin will be just fine though.


Cheers.



1215. Post 52812606 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on October 19, 2019, 08:00:39 PM
TODAY  I  LOST MY FAITH IN DEMOCRACY


snipped the 1pt message

Are you referring to Brexit?

Personally, i think that the age of the republics would soon be over, followed by a new age of the empires (you can already see these 'strongman' tendencies all over the globe).
Empires would continue maybe for another few hundred years, followed by Dark ages II, hopefully followed by something utopian (better democracy?).
Unfortunately, we are living in the transitional period. It is interesting, but full of turmoil.
Fourth turning?



1216. Post 52814390 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

I am curious as to what would happen to the telegram token?
It is not a stablecoin, yet it was attacked.
Maybe, mostly 'wrong' investors, lol?
I can almost see the point...almost.
We shall see in Feb-April.

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on October 20, 2019, 02:42:00 AM
Pack it up.  Turn out the lights.

Bitcoin Has Failed But Global Stablecoins a Threat, Say BIS and G7 - CoinDesk

https://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-has-failed-but-global-stablecoins-a-threat-say-bis-and-g7

In a way it's almost a relief...no more wondering.

This is great news, they don't attack what they don't fear. Smiley

Oh, the irony. They keep seeing threats in tokens that represent fiat currencies, like stablecoins and libra. 10 years on, and they still fail to see that BTC is their kryptonite.

Maintain course and speed, gentlemen.

I like this, they are pretending we failed, bc they know they cant stop us. Better in their eyes to save face and leave us alone than come after King Bitcoin and his legions of Hodlers and be defeated, this is good for us short and long term.

I can see some logic in this...bitcoin is recruiting more users , but relatively slowly (still maybe just 30-50mil), so the transition might take another decade or more while FBcoin potentially can get to hundreds of millions if not couple of billions in much shorter timeframe, destabilizing everything.



1217. Post 52823782 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: BinaryReign on October 20, 2019, 10:27:26 PM
Observing a slow climb Sunday? Still not enough, something tells me we should be well above $14,000 USD right now.

Something I’d recommend you guys watch is Unnatural Selection on Netflix. I was up all night binge watching every episode. I love science lol  Grin

Cool, thanks for mentioning it.
I was discussing this topic before as well.
It seems that we are on the verge of profound changes in our biology.

In addition, aging is important as well, but most difficult to tackle, perhaps.



1218. Post 52868929 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on October 24, 2019, 11:39:23 PM

Did anyone actually go to the linked Forbes article. This little gem is in there:

Quote
The reward is currently 12.5 bitcoin but soon enough the reward will be only 6.175 BTC.

It's called a halving people. This is too difficult?  Undecided

How likely is that his/hers mom/dad had made a "valuable" donation to the Ivy league school where this journo was educated....
I calculate an approximately 61.75% probability.



1219. Post 52869405 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Binance to launch venal crypto.
Not kidding...well, almost.



1220. Post 52880680 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

I could think of at least a half a dozen reasons for this move, but this does not make these reasons causative.
Honestly, just enjoying it, although I did buy some at around 8600.
The corn cratered 100 points immediately after, ha ha, then surged.

If anyone cares, here are the reasons:

1. Oversold btc short term (RSI).
2. Some verbiage from China.
3. Late response from the pounding of Libra. First response was wrong (move from 8k to 7.4K) hence Libra is our competitor, I believe.
4. Something something about tether.
5. Novo starting a couple of new funds in November. He probably bought those futures at 7.4. What can entice new investors more than a scent of a fast upside? Now we will correct so they don't feel that they are overpaying.
6. We are oscillating back to the PlanB chart's median value.
7. We were oversold on Meyers multiple.
etc., etc.



1221. Post 52880706 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: iwantapony on October 26, 2019, 04:10:21 AM
Looks like 2019 will be the new version of 2017!




we are NOT going to make it to 16K and if we will, than that guy is from OUR future. /s



1222. Post 52880876 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: ivomm on October 26, 2019, 04:39:49 AM
Jeeeeeesus Christ! What did happen during the night?!?!?!? From 7400 to 10 350 on Bitstamp (10 540 on coinbase)!!! This is  the greatest pump in less than 12 hours in the history of Bitcoin (at least for the last years). Back to bed now (fingers crossed for 15K after I wake up). LOL

EU/UK were missing in action (mostly).



1223. Post 52881379 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on October 26, 2019, 06:00:16 AM


Just imagine the 16K October prediction to come true...... Cheesy

Or very close, that would be so insane

it ain't happening, man, it ain't happening

a tribute to late B. Paxton, RIP



1224. Post 52881606 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on October 26, 2019, 06:20:44 AM
The earnings are substantial.

Quote
The previous two times Bitcoin saw a >40% daily gain, it was trading at $0.40 and $5.65.

Today, Bitcoin’s 42% swing is the 3rd largest daily gain in price history.

Data via @coinmetrics


Source: https://twitter.com/yassineARK/status/1187916570766561280

Hodl!

I actually don't like this chart since it shows that pretty much every time when there was an outsize move up, it was followed by almost the same %% move down, especially in the first half of the chart. Hopefully, we will be able to escape this here, I hope, or it would be brutal.



1225. Post 52890078 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.05h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on October 26, 2019, 11:07:52 PM
Just looked that up, quite a long read. And yes, the UK does not charge an annual tax for property (land) like Austria (for example) does.

We limeys do pay Council Tax which is banded based on property value, however.

As do we swedes, max 780 USD per annum and some properties are exempt, like some agriculture land for example.

Around here (US) the tax is once a year, about 2% of the total property value (in my state) and the retarded part about it is that they tell you the exact tax at around Nov 15, but you have to shell out the cash by Jan 31. Most people escrow the estimated tax payment together with the mortgage, though.
However, 2% is annoyingly high as they keep bumping the fake house prices up.
Why fake? Because houses sell at the numbers that are lower than citi estimates suggest.



1226. Post 52942691 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

For WO to salivate over...maybe when btc is at $5mil, lol

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-super-rich-are-buying-100-million-homes-for-some-one-isnt-enough-11572548543



1227. Post 52943311 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

^you guys have too much imagination...i see only some letters and numbers  Grin



1228. Post 52962195 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

I looked at the bunch of charts this afternoon and PlanB/digitalik one's continue to impress.
The question is: if this is basically a co-integrated chart where btc is almost pre-destined to go to about 55-100K after this halving, then when to expect the rally?
Last time we were lagging in June/July 2016 at $500-700/btc when "theoretical" value jumped to about $4K.
It probably represented the best entry point as far as short term risk/reward ratio looking backwards a few years.
However, since now these charts were wildly circulated, one can expect a run that might peak actually at the halving or shortly thereafter, like in Nov-Dec 2020 instead of Nov-Dec 2021?
Hoping that price stays flat and there would be some instrument to buy btc in the retirement account. Don't want to "invest" in anything else there at the moment.



1229. Post 52962391 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on November 02, 2019, 09:44:05 PM
Remember when the goal was to get 21BTC, which surely would put any of those folks who had been able to HODL onto that amount as being in a very decent position at $100k per coin, and now there are a lot of meme-ing around the random 6.15BTC goal, which seems to rely on BTC going much higher than $100k per coin in order to really be comfortable.

I guess that part of my point is that amount of BTC goals are going down and down and down.  Of course, we have those who are either with a mediocre budget or are just getting in striving to get to 1BTC and more.  There have surely been some of those folks participating in this thread.  At some point, we are going to have peeps aspiring to get 1 million satoshis... or whatever other reasonable amount becomes our new deflationary goalpost point.

Oh man, how I love this post!
Thanks JJG!

That's a moving target. I just looked at official inflation numbers and it is a woozy.
Basically, dollar lost about 50% in relative value since 30 years ago, therefore, to be "comfortable" in the future you need to take this into consideration, but it is very difficult to do since, historically, forward inflation values were not very predictable.



1230. Post 52962970 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

“We should be happier to have a job than to have our savings protected,” said Lagarde.

Well, what about those who are 'out of the job' when they are of the retirement age?
They have nothing between them and the poor house, but their savings and some social programs.
What a pisser!

bullish for btc, though.



1231. Post 52970468 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on November 03, 2019, 01:15:46 AM
Some things change.  Some stay the same.
img clipped

What are you trying to say, hairy mcbary?  Are you trying to say that we are largely "on track"?

The real action will start in early 2021.

On the accelerated model - I never agreed with it.  That model puts us at $15k now and $50k in January 2020.  It’s not going to happen.  

"That's just your opinion, man".

I never agreed to it, either.
We shall see, but my take is that we will get there (up to 50K) largely by the end of 2020 instead of 2021 (maybe not full 50K, but above ATH).

HairyMaclairy
says that the bull will be late;
corn does not listen





1232. Post 52970626 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Lagarde speaks the same:
pensioners will be poorer;
bitcoin will save them



1233. Post 52972436 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Defining the upper bound:

In 2012-13 S/F (https://twitter.com/100trillionusd?lang=en) predicted $100-120, we jumped 10X of that, then declined to slightly below the trend.
In 2016-17 S/F predicted about 4K, we jumped to 20K, which is 5X (or half of the prior cycle "excess"), then again declined to slightly below the trend.
This time, S/F predicts either 55k (the original graph) or 100K (amended graph), therefore if the trend of diminishing excess would continue by cutting it in half at each halving, then the upper bound peak is about 250K (or about 137.5K if original numbers are taken into consideration).
The follow up drop is expected to 40-50K from 250K OR to 27.5K from 137.5K.

I doubt that PTB would allow us a smooth distribution at 150-250K. Probably a blow off top again.
I am mentally preparing myself to sell a chunk within 50% of the top and be happy about it.



1234. Post 52974244 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: infofront on November 04, 2019, 12:35:42 AM
I was gone for the weekend, bow hunting. I saw a decent buck at about 55 yards, took a shot, and missed. C'est la vie!

Here are the poll results for posterity:



BONUS: Suggest the new poll!

When will be the new ATH?

Choices:
Early 2020
Late 2020
Early 2021
Late 2021
2022
2023
2024
Never



1235. Post 52984319 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: OgNasty on November 04, 2019, 09:35:36 PM
I'm amazed how many people still haven't figured out the 4-year cycle and hang on the daily price movements...  I guess there's some truth to what they say, math is hard.

Although i agree with this thesis, but it is still unclear if it is as absolute as, say, spring/summer/fall/winter cycle caused by the tilting of the earth axis as it rotates around the sun OR a loose correlation that would eventually have diminishing effects. My take is that it still matters, but eventually it would not, or matter much less.
Some people (not me) might surmise that the 4-year cycle effects are already small. We shall see, but a cycle that is out of whack would distort the trend.
We almost went there this June.



1236. Post 52994700 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: bkbirge on November 04, 2019, 12:34:06 PM


https://cointelegraph.com/news/one-whale-was-behind-bitcoins-2017-bull-run-claim-researchers
Quote
“Simulations show that these patterns are highly unlikely to be due to chance. This one large player or entity either exhibited clairvoyant market timing or exerted an extremely large price impact on Bitcoin that is not observed in aggregate flows from other smaller traders.”

"I am not saying that it was aliens"...






1237. Post 53032382 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on November 09, 2019, 07:40:17 PM
via Imgflip Meme Generator

Btw took this at home in my front yard

Is this what bitcoinpshyco is taken??

second url snipped

It’s a big F***er




Amanita muscaria

That's what berserkers took before the battle according to some.
WO pals from central/northern Europe have got to have some berserker "blood" (aka gene variables) in them.

PS some people think that it was rather Hyoscyamus niger that was responsible for berserker's rage.
PPS in completely unrelated direction, I found "Berserker" sci-fi novel series by Fred Sabarhagen to be quite amusing.
Something similar/parallel in content to the "Mass effect" games.



1238. Post 53033859 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on November 10, 2019, 01:04:19 AM
How much must one bitcoin cost after halving to cover mining costs? Let's say in USA.

if you use the most efficient miner (S17 pro) and you use an average cost of electricity in US at 10c/kwh, then with CURRENT difficulty, you would be breaking even (without amortizing the miner) at about 9.7K/btc. Obviously, difficulty is likely to be higher in 7 months.



1239. Post 53033945 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: bitserve on November 10, 2019, 02:02:09 AM
How much must one bitcoin cost after halving to cover mining costs? Let's say in USA.

if you use the most efficient miner (S17 pro) and you use an average cost of electricity in US at 10c/kwh, then with CURRENT difficulty, you would be breaking even (without amortizing the miner) at about 9.7K/btc. Obviously, difficulty is likely to be higher in 7 months.

$9.7K already for the most efficient miner? Wow... that's higher than what I currently thought.

Of course I don't think mining farms pay nowhere near to domestic 10c/kwh but, on the other hand, they DO NEED to also amortise the machines and overhead costs or go bankrupt in the long run.


not already, the question was for "after halving". NOW half or $4.85K or so.



1240. Post 53033982 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

My money is on Rick to humbly ask Bob to sell some and Bob acquiescing if and when we would crawl to 11-13K.
That number (11K) seems to be a sell attractor. I also sold some around 11K in 2017 and perhaps 1.2K higher in 2019.
For newbs to have bitcoins someone has to sell.
It is just a theory...please don't throw any heavy objects my way  Grin



1241. Post 53042920 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.06h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on November 10, 2019, 06:32:03 PM
Congrats LFC you earned a drink for this victory Cheesy

They almost made it contested in the end.
The referee could have easily given penalty on 83rd min, with these 'unintentional' hand balls you never know.
I happen to think that it was right this time, all things considered, but i have seen the exact same situations resulting in a penalty kick, especially in international games.
A defending player in the box has got to put his arms behind the torso, otherwise you could surmise that he is preventing the ball passage even if he did not visibly move the arm toward the ball.

Re 7K (for a basic macpro), I am not doing anything that could justify this.
I used to buy pro versions of the mac, but later discovered that a regular Mac or PC are just fine for my purposes.



1242. Post 53061013 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: jbreher on November 12, 2019, 08:14:50 PM
Seems like
@Bakkt
 is on pace to break $20m in daily volume soon as they consistently notch above $10m now.

H/t:
@BakktBot



https://twitter.com/trajanmex/status/1193942948867522560?s=20

It's not too hard to figure out. BAKKT customers need not be Bitcoiners. Look at the last day. You could sell a future contract for 9500 or so, by the chart. Well, you could buy BTC at that day's price (as low as 8775), and sell a contract, your assets and liabilities balance, you pocket money. A fair amount. With the only downside being the counterparty risk of the parent company of the mudderfukkin' New York Stock Exchange.

It's a pretty simple calculus. The only miracle is that the volume isn't higher.

You can shave some, but much less than you imply.
The cost of
nov19 8810
dec19 8902.5
jan20 8962

(8962-8810)/8810 is about 1.7% in 2 months or 10% yearly.
https://www.theice.com



1243. Post 53086410 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on November 15, 2019, 04:52:19 PM
No big volume, no sign of the Bargain Boyz to be found. Highly unlikely this downtrend from 14k ends till they show up and declare "cheap coins".

Coins have to be so cheap that they feel compelled to buy. Hopefully the 6ks will do the trick but we all know it could be lower. The massive volume will tell us when. It always has every other time in Bitcoin, this time is not different.

Cue the JJG "slayer you are annoying me with your downtrend stuff" even though thats what this has been since 14k for almost 5 months Wink

We all knew the pump to 14k was a minibubble and a minibear market would have to follow. I dont make the rules around here, this is Bitcoin Country.

Good news is when the mythical Bargain Boyz show up for cheap coins, that will be the last time we ever see those prices and the ride to 100k-200k can commence.  Cheesy

I suspect Bargain Boyz are still loading up on Popeyes right now but will soon turn their attention to corn if we catch their eye with some bargain sub 7k prices. 6400 would really do the trick imo.

The only problem with this logic is that you project MORE than 50% decline vs local top of 13.8.
AFAICR it never happened in the prior bull. Not a rule, but...
Maybe it is mimicking a double humped 2013? One may hope...



1244. Post 53087669 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Well, talking about the old timers.
Jesse Livermore said that once you start counting on the market to do something specific that would allow you to buy a new house, etc, like "it would go to 100K in 18 mo", it always bites you in the proverbial ass. In 2017 NOBODY expected 20K when it was still below 1K in march or april, yet it happened.

I always expect the unexpected from the corn and try to stay humble, so stories of glorious 2021 kind of get under my skin, but I understand the desire.
As a personal confession, I, like some others here (Searing), might be less interested in what happens (price wise) after 2028 or maybe even after 2024.
The next cycle is where my corn account would either succeed or fail.

At some point man can just choose to "Chill in the Caribbean", although I might prefer something more of a temperate climate after being "roasted" for the last few decades.
Just no freaking forest fires, please.



1245. Post 53094226 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Sorry to distract ya'll from an apparent dick measuring contest...

What's your take on perpetual trusts?
Here is Guardian's:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/14/the-great-american-tax-haven-why-the-super-rich-love-south-dakota-trust-laws

I think that this would be relevant to bitcoin later on.
There are lots of "golden nuggets" in this article.
The main conclusion is that we might be changing the society by allowing perpetual trusts (details in the article).



1246. Post 53095817 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on November 16, 2019, 09:04:47 PM
Sorry to distract ya'll from an apparent dick measuring contest...

What's your take on perpetual trusts?
Here is Guardian's:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/14/the-great-american-tax-haven-why-the-super-rich-love-south-dakota-trust-laws

I think that this would be relevant to bitcoin later on.
There are lots of "golden nuggets" in this article.
The main conclusion is that we might be changing the society by allowing perpetual trusts (details in the article).


This golden nugget is relevant to some US bitcoiners right now. How many will be moving to South Dakota before cashing out to avoid capital gains tax?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/14/the-great-american-tax-haven-why-the-super-rich-love-south-dakota-trust-laws

Quote
South Dakota has no income tax, no inheritance tax and no capital gains tax

The perpetual trusts thing seems a massive deal, and probably will be relevant to Bitcoin later on.

Well, hold your horses, there are still federal taxes, including capital gains tax. It's not written very clearly.
The only no cap gains tax for US citizens is the Puerto-Rico deal, but it is only until 2035 and only on cap gains AFTER you domesticated/moved your assets there.
Plus, you HAVE to reside there 183 days/year.



1247. Post 53095878 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: bitserve on November 16, 2019, 09:44:36 PM
"The first word you see is the only "crypto" that matters."



https://twitter.com/zackvoell/status/1195781900209729536

CLARPER?!  

8/8 (from bottom/from left)
 Grin

I don't know what words like "solvent", "believe" and "expert" are doing there (no such currencies, lol)



1248. Post 53097615 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: Searing on November 17, 2019, 03:52:47 AM
Sorry to distract ya'll from an apparent dick measuring contest...

What's your take on perpetual trusts?
Here is Guardian's:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/14/the-great-american-tax-haven-why-the-super-rich-love-south-dakota-trust-laws

I think that this would be relevant to bitcoin later on.
There are lots of "golden nuggets" in this article.
The main conclusion is that we might be changing the society by allowing perpetual trusts (details in the article).


This golden nugget is relevant to some US bitcoiners right now. How many will be moving to South Dakota before cashing out to avoid capital gains tax?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/14/the-great-american-tax-haven-why-the-super-rich-love-south-dakota-trust-laws

Quote
South Dakota has no income tax, no inheritance tax and no capital gains tax

The perpetual trusts thing seems a massive deal, and probably will be relevant to Bitcoin later on.

Well, hold your horses, there are still federal taxes, including capital gains tax. It's not written very clearly.
The only no cap gains tax for US citizens is the Puerto-Rico deal, but it is only until 2035 and only on cap gains AFTER you domesticated/moved your assets there.
Plus, you HAVE to reside there 183 days/year.


That explains why nobody has already suggested South Dakota.

I read about the pros and cons of the Puerto-Rico deal here. Like you say, it's complicated.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/are-tax-moves-to-puerto-rico-worth-it-for-crypto-holders

I thought there was a tax in Puerto Rico has a 10.5% sales tax https://www.avalara.com/taxrates/en/state-rates/puerto-rico.html

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_Puerto_Rico

Still confused about if/how or if you pay any Commenwealth Taxes or Provencial Taxes on top of the above.


That's a very confusing article.
Maybe read this one instead:
https://prbusinesslink.com/act-22/

Personally, I am too lazy and set in my ways to uproot myself, but there are a bunch of youtube videos that describe the experience.



1249. Post 53104632 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

An interesting analysis of the price dynamics before and after halving:

https://coinsavage.com/content/2019/09/bitcoin-halving-everything-you-need-to-know/

halving is coming,
but am I fully prepared
to trust the patterns?


looking at these charts,
it is nothing but a dream
that might come calling



1250. Post 53105686 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on November 17, 2019, 12:29:33 AM
Sorry to distract ya'll from an apparent dick measuring contest...

What's your take on perpetual trusts?
Here is Guardian's:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/14/the-great-american-tax-haven-why-the-super-rich-love-south-dakota-trust-laws

I think that this would be relevant to bitcoin later on.
There are lots of "golden nuggets" in this article.
The main conclusion is that we might be changing the society by allowing perpetual trusts (details in the article).


This golden nugget is relevant to some US bitcoiners right now. How many will be moving to South Dakota before cashing out to avoid capital gains tax?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/14/the-great-american-tax-haven-why-the-super-rich-love-south-dakota-trust-laws

Quote
South Dakota has no income tax, no inheritance tax and no capital gains tax

The perpetual trusts thing seems a massive deal, and probably will be relevant to Bitcoin later on.

Well, hold your horses, there are still federal taxes, including capital gains tax. It's not written very clearly.
The only no cap gains tax for US citizens is the Puerto-Rico deal, but it is only until 2035 and only on cap gains AFTER you domesticated/moved your assets there.
Plus, you HAVE to reside there 183 days/year.


Yes but federal taxes don’t apply to offshore assets owned by foreigners. This is about tax rorts for foreigners, not Yanks

True, I was looking at it from the US perspective.
However, the deal is better for non-US citizens.
Oh well, it's almost always the case  Sad



1251. Post 53105895 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on November 17, 2019, 10:06:06 PM
Apparently all McDonalds in India serves halal burgers, and indians don't like that so they are boycotting McD, at least according to a Swedish newspaper.

"All our restaurants have HALAL certificates. You can ask the respective restaurant Managers to show you the certificate for your satisfaction and confirmation. (2/2)


ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
@HasdaaPunjab
Go To Hell, then. We Hindus only have JHATKA MEAT, Will educate others as well to not have any Non Veg Food From your chain. If you not want to end up like ZOMATO, ensure that JHATKA MEAT is served. Else, embrace for Financial Loss. https://twitter.com/mcdonaldsindia/status/1164584030647377920?s=19 …"

Now, my question to you Indians here is: what the hell is ZOMATO and JHATKA MEAT?


source: google search

ZOMATO- a global restaurant chain, probably failed in India
JHATKA-when animal is killed by a single stroke..never knew about it...maybe from a particular religious point of view.



1252. Post 53106728 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

This dude has an exact opposite investment strategy to JJG, lol
Sorry, an alt is mentioned.

https://thehustle.co/how-i-made-13-million-cryptocurrency-ethereum/

I honestly think that he is not done yet..and would probably lose almost all this money in his next "gambling adventure".
No schadenfreude.

I wonder how many lose everything when prone to these urges.
I made a promise to myself to restrict my btc investment to a certain % of fiat and so far I was able to resist doing anything silly like this  ^guy.
Sorry, LS, I am not all in "king". If I was, imagine going from 20K to 3K. It would have been bad for your health.



1253. Post 53106888 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: jbreher on November 18, 2019, 02:35:40 AM
OK boomer.

Is that supposed to be some cutting pejorative?

That was originally said by Greta's accolade, he's just quoting the viral meme:
https://youtu.be/ipe9WxUfh7w?t=34

I don't pass judgement on generations as it is a stupid thing to do.
It goes nowhere, besides at the moment boomers have most of the money anyway.



1254. Post 53139816 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on November 21, 2019, 04:19:17 PM
Wait until Bob sees this. Rick is not going to have an enjoyable evening Cheesy

Rick is fine. I moved around some money from other investments into the house account, and dude has been off my case ever since; he's looking to retire in 6 months, and his neurosis are kicking into high-gear, about everything being in order prior to him bailing.

HODLing my corn. Not sure I want to sell 2 BTC at this level to buy the new Mac Pro when it's released, along with the new 16" Macbook Pro - as I had originally planned. Might just raid one of my piggy banks for that purchase if we're not back above $10k in the next 30 days.

It looks like we came a full circle since Sun micro workstation days...in price.

Phones cost like computers used to even recently
Computers (some) cost like cars used to...
Cars cost like houses used to...
Houses...



1255. Post 53139932 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: VB1001 on November 21, 2019, 04:27:06 PM
infofront

Next poll?

How many are in WO?

Hodler
Bull
Trader
Weak Hands

I am developing a zen attitude toward all of this.

If we (humans) don't want it (bitcoin benefits), I say...
https://youtu.be/xMZrEzU62lA?t=70



1256. Post 53151657 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: fillippone on November 22, 2019, 01:32:08 PM
Bridgewater putting on $1.5B option trade betting on market decline by March 2020.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/bridgewater-bets-big-on-market-drop-11574418601?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/xyiKN6jA3v

There is a paywall on that article, so I am posting another link here:

Bridgewater bets more than 1 billion on global equity pullback by March

The key takeaway is the following:

Quote
Bridgewater paid roughly $1.5 billion for the options contracts, or just about 1% of the Westport, Conn., firm’s $150 billion in assets under management, according to people familiar with the matter.

This means they bought a lottery ticket, paying 1.5 Billion, to hedge their long exposure of 150 Billions with a short one of around 100 billion (this is something I read elsewhere behind other paywalls, so you have to trust me).  This 100 billion short insurance will be effective at lower market level.
So, probably, it is only a way to avoid too heavy losses in case of a significant drop in the market.


Yes, that's just hedging.
I would be much more interested in knowing what Universa is up to.



1257. Post 53152416 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: mindrust on November 22, 2019, 09:38:22 PM
This man is pretty godly.

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/JSP3KDmy-New-long-term-prediction-as-I-see-it-now/


This is (was) the bottom probably. Maybe it will try one more time to break below 6k... then to the fckn moon.

Only IF we turn around sharply right here or in vicinity and go to 80K-90K in one move, which could happen.

Quote from: SuperTA on November 22, 2019, 09:53:18 PM

Yes, that's what i'm talking about. The thread is full of those hopium charts based on the longterm curve that was never a good indicator for the future's price. Based on the previous wrong longterm curves it would be good to lower the curve and expectation. This thread had too many of those hopiums in recent  months that are now bringing a dissapointment to some readers.

It could go the other way just as well (much higher than current graphs indicate). Why not?
AMZN chart in the first 11 years of it's existence did not predict the moonshot that followed in the next 11.
Same for AAPL.




1258. Post 53153060 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on November 22, 2019, 11:27:51 PM
About the Tesla pickup, I LOVE IT!!
It's exactly what I've been dreaming of ever since watching Blade Runner and Alien in the 80s.
I never liked the sedan models with their ugly rounded 90s look, but this one, just what I have been dreaming of since the 80s.
That's my next car after the new blow of top in 2021. Thank you Elon.

You can't argue taste, but it looks like an APC.
I wonder if APCs could be had, used.
I checked out model 3: it is certainly not worth the asking price ($42K) because the cabin is so small.
Model S is nice, but about twice the price of a midsize beemer.



1259. Post 53153399 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

I spent three months of my life on btctalk.
Oh, well.
As Bob might say:
"Sheeeeit"



1260. Post 53163041 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

An interesting analysis:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_ylh8LmfqQ

If you don't want to look at the video, here is probably the same guy's chart:
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/vwsB8lTY-Exact-Price-and-Date-for-Peak-of-next-Bitcoin-Bull-Run/

TL;DR It could go down to 5-5.5K first or NOT (Dec-Feb time frame), then off to the races until $320K in late 2021.


My "fundamental" pseudoanalysis:

At halving S2F doubles, but price is going up approx 2^3.5 times (about 10-11X).
After next halving, S2f would be 56, which is 0.9 of Gold.
0.9^3.5=0.7
Therefore, THEORETICALLy, and based on scarcity alone (without considering demand), the value of btc might equal 0.7 of gold's market value.
Total value of excavated gold is currently (1465/1250)X7.5tril=8.8 tril
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_reserve
Some people think that almost half of gold should not be counted because it is either inaccessible or lost.
So, 4.5-9 tril, roughly.
therefore, market value of BTC, based on S2F should be 0.7X (either 4.5 or 9 tril)=3.15-6.3 tril
With roughly 18.1 mil btc currently, this would amount to 174-348K/btc sometime after the halving.

Interestingly, and unsurprisingly, my number matches several other projections.




1261. Post 53163192 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.07h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on November 24, 2019, 06:46:03 AM
The only problem is when majority expects something it usually doesn't happen. Until they change their mind because of panic sell or fomo caused by the tricky whales.

The problem there is when the majority expects that whatever the majority believes wont happen, then they lose all expectation. Then the situation is a majority of people saying they dont know what will happen because they got caught up in the urban legend of "whatever the majority believes wont end up happening".

The truth is someone always know what will happen and sometimes the majority is right and sometimes they are wrong, but someone always knows something and ends up being right. And when it comes to Bitcoin that someone is a powerful group known as the Bargain Boyz.



the majority of WO was right on the money in 7.5K vs 9.5K quiz.



1262. Post 53171859 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on November 25, 2019, 02:27:32 AM
The Bargain Boyz clearly have no interest in these prices so its going lower.

If 6400 doesnt hold and then I fully expect we plunge down to the 5200 range I suspect it will be a ride straight down with almost no big bounces in between, bc the April Tether Fud that started this Bubble took us from 5200 to over 7k with basically no big dips. Im expecting history to rhyme a bit and a straight shot to 5200 if Bargain Boyz dont rescue Bitcoin.

They told me they are celebrating Thanksgiving with fam this week so I wouldnt expect a Bargain Boyz ultra high volume bounce before then, maybe a low volume bounce that will get sold quickly at best.

This Thanksgiving is going to be full of Nocoiners saying "I hear Bitcoin crashed," and "I told you so" to noble Hodlers.  A small price to pay to be one of the future financial elite.



Hmmm I think you are starting to get a bit greedy Lambie.   It is possible, but I am not seeing justification for a downside breakout.  

Everybody is entitled to a particular opinion, but I think that it is almost out of the question that we would be following prior fractal 'exactly', so $10K and $5K are equally possible.
By now, everyone should just admit that btc price is simply chaotic with an upward bias (so far).



1263. Post 53172115 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on November 25, 2019, 02:57:56 AM
The Bargain Boyz clearly have no interest in these prices so its going lower.

If 6400 doesnt hold and then I fully expect we plunge down to the 5200 range I suspect it will be a ride straight down with almost no big bounces in between, bc the April Tether Fud that started this Bubble took us from 5200 to over 7k with basically no big dips. I'm expecting history to rhyme a bit and a straight shot to 5200 if Bargain Boyz dont rescue Bitcoin.

They told me they are celebrating Thanksgiving with fam this week so I wouldnt expect a Bargain Boyz ultra high volume bounce before then, maybe a low volume bounce that will get sold quickly at best.

This Thanksgiving is going to be full of Nocoiners saying "I hear Bitcoin crashed," and "I told you so" to noble Hodlers.  A small price to pay to be one of the future financial elite.



Hmmm I think you are starting to get a bit greedy Lambie.   It is possible, but I am not seeing justification for a downside breakout.  

Everybody is entitled to a particular opinion, but I think that it is almost out of the question that we would be following prior fractal 'exactly', so $10K and $5K are equally possible.
By now, everyone should just admit that btc price is simply chaotic with an upward bias (so far).

@H.M.- I think greed was on the minds of the buyers over 9k who thought a bubble this early after a major bear market was sustainable.

Im staying pragmatic and ruthlessly unbiased. Its gonna take a capitulation event imo to end this and since so far 6ks arent seeming to produce one Im naturally setting my sights on 5200 as the climax of a capitulation event. Im not deploying my last fiat until I see the Bargain Boyz ultra volume or 4900-5200 range prices, whichever comes first. If hypothetically 5200 comes first I of course reserve the right to still not deploy said fiat if I see other things I don't like, hopefully that's not the case but these things are always in flux and developing in real time.

The great news for all Bitcoin lovers is all this bearish price action imo is coming to a close and a new Bull chapter will soon begin once we reach the bear climax.

@biodom - Aspiring to make sense out of the seeming chaos of the world is human nature and what separates us from the lower primates. Not to mention its a lot more fun and interesting than shrugging and submitting to a "nobody knows" mentality. This is why humanity is constantly advancing and doing things that were unthinkable a hundred years prior.

Chaos is simply unapprehended complexity.

Sorry, I don't find your guesses very entertaining since they are not based on anything (ostensibly) in your presentation.
At least, @HM has his favorite fractal.

...Peter Brandt is a doofus who thinks that markets work according to TA and not the other way around.

Suffice it to say, but ALL market predictors got f-ed up this year.
Therefore, I declare bitcoin price fundamentally unpredictable.
That's my null hypothesis now.

I will buy when I see fit, and I will sell as I see fit (to do things).

PS Bargain Boyz? LOL



1264. Post 53206741 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: VB1001 on November 28, 2019, 05:44:25 PM


Quote
Bitcoin Analysis.

- Bull cycles are getting longer.
- ROI since bottom are decreasing.

Conclusion of cycle IV:

Next top: ~ 1400 days since bottom. ETA December 2022
ROI: ~40X since bottom, ~120k $.
https://twitter.com/IamCryptoWolf/status/1199703369880915969



Merited because of an interesting opinion, but i don't really fully buy the thesis that cycles are bound to increase in length since they are being driven (apparently) by halvings. In addition, if ROI are decreasing, but drawdowns stay the same (around 85%), then I just don't see whay it would continue in this pattern. I would reluctantly agree IF drawdowns were smaller, but so far they are not (to a significant degree).

It's like saying that since this summer was unusually long because of balmy weather it would mean that the next one would be longer still.



1265. Post 53208681 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: jojo69 on November 29, 2019, 02:10:43 AM
On this day, in some parts of North America, we celebrate the technological inferiority of the original inhabitants at first contact, in particular their total lack of gunpowder and resistance to certain European diseases, by eating large birds until we are physically ill.

Cheers WO.

It could have been different https://www.svtplay.se/video/24277269/allt-for-sverige/allt-for-sverige-sasong-9-avsnitt-2?start=auto 22:40

Programmet kan bara ses i Sverige

Swedish soccer fans are one's of the best...singing ALL game long (saw it at the world Cup).
I was genuinely entertained and impressed.



1266. Post 53224593 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: Paashaas on November 30, 2019, 07:38:37 PM
Group F... Tongue



how is it even possible to have France, Germany and Portugal in one group?
Wicked.



1267. Post 53226276 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Apparently, natural power-law corridor of growth for bitcoin has been falsified:

https://medium.com/burgercrypto-com/debunking-bitcoins-natural-long-term-power-law-corridor-of-growth-c1f336e558f6

Premise:

Quote
One person in particular keeps coming back saying his model does a better job. Harold Christopher Burger’s idea was to build a comparable model, but instead of taking the natural logarithm of the stock to flow ratio as an independent variable, he thought the natural logarithm of time would be a better input. He reasoned that stock-to-flow is a function of time, so time itself must perform better. Even though Nick has demonstrated repeatedly (here for instance) how PlanB’s model is just better, Harold keeps claiming his work is superior.

What followed is a falsification of the Burger's model, at least according to the author.
PlanB's model is still standing (so far).



1268. Post 53226399 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: SuperTA on December 01, 2019, 02:22:32 AM
How to be sucessfull (or at least try to be)

1. 80 hour work week
2. Sacrifice weekends, nights, holidays
3. Risk taking, dump all money into what you believe
4. Failure 99% of the time 
5. Do not quit despite failure
6. Read incessantly, constant self improvement
7. Competitive af + put up with haters

A strange game.
The only winning move is not to play.



1269. Post 53226635 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

LS and JJG imagine that they are 'in it' like this:

https://youtu.be/iH5R4tgGdDk?t=100

Do we take JJG for Joker (for obvious reasons) and Animal Mother for LS...

In reality, it is more like this:

https://youtu.be/aq89D6PXkbc?t=16



1270. Post 53236376 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

resting peacefully
after a raging battle,
bitcoin is ready...



1271. Post 53236491 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: Icygreen on December 02, 2019, 02:36:15 AM

I was under the impression that US senate and congress persons were not permitted to hold Bitcoin.  

They can hold it, but have to report such holdings.



1272. Post 53244566 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on December 02, 2019, 08:59:04 PM
Hi Wo! The winner of the Golden Ball! Messi!!

Quote
Can you believe this?! Six #ballondor for Lionel Messi 👀 How much more to come?





Source: https://twitter.com/francefootball/status/1201603759626997763

            https://www.theguardian.com/football/live/2019/dec/02/ballon-dor-2019-football-awards-messi-van-dijk-rapinoe-live

How many BTC will Messi have?

Fully deserved, but i feel like CR deserved one last year. It went to Modric instead.
CR played much better than Messi at the World Cup. The only reason CR did not get it last year is because he left RM.

Overall, Messi has an edge over CR due to his phenomenal technique. The ball placement is just sublime.
CR will not get any more judging by how he plays now, most likely, but Messi could still get more.



1273. Post 53244587 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.08h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 02, 2019, 11:01:47 PM

Like him but should be Van Dijk IMO

van Dijk will get one if he captains Dutch to the first world cup (on the fourth third attempt), scoring a monumental header in OT Wink



1274. Post 53279201 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Can we see a couple of fractal charts?
I kind of miss them.




1275. Post 53294773 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

I don't want to mention any alts, but it is a bit strange that AA starts talking about multiple chains forming the "Internet of money". Here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VG-zln3TUg

The only current weakness I see in bitcoin is a potential for a sudden fee increase, which should be alleviated by the LN in principle, however, it's the details that matter. Not a problem right now.

VCs will be hyping other chains, that's beyond the question. SEC tackled telegram for now, but there will be others.
Anybody knows if is there a vehicle that trades bitcoin dominance? It could be an interesting hedge trade.
PlanB, incidentally, thinks that dominance is about to spike higher ("Guess, what's next" twit)
https://twitter.com/100trillionUSD/status/1203012308513017856



1276. Post 53304861 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: mindrust on December 09, 2019, 05:50:46 PM
snippped..chart1
snipped..chart2

Some hopium charts.

On the first one, the daily 350 MA is holding quite well while the Mayer Multiple is 0.78. Last time MM was this low it was the last year when the bitcoin was below $4k.

On the second chart we see the 200 Weekly Moving Average. According to this one, we never entered the bear market at all. The moment we came pretty close was last year when the price was $3.2k. What happened then? A mini bull to 14k.

Conclusion: We are very close to the bottom.

Now the Important Questions:

Q- Can it go lower?
A- Sure it can.

Q- Is it worth waiting?
A- I don't think so.

Q- Would you go all in from these prices?
A- Not my thing but I would start putting some serious amounts if I had no bitcoins. I personally increased my DCA's lately. (I did slow it down it in after May when it was above 10k and I told you when it was happening)

It is under 10k. Very close to the some serious support levels. 200DMA was a serious one too but I remember what I said back then, the real boss is the 350DMA. (The king boss commanding general is 200WMA)

I would buy bitcoin from these levels and that's what I am doing.

The fact that we recently declined below Mayer multiple of 1.0 makes this cycle particularly weird.
Witness how it never did this during 2015-2017 bull run (once it started going by the end of 2015).



1277. Post 53312341 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on December 10, 2019, 03:52:35 PM
Some variations that have made the PlanB model. It catches my attention because PlanB liked it.

Quote
For this, i calculated the vecm for each month and took the confidence intervals from the models. for the forecast part, i used the confidence interval from the last model. this last part is the interval given by exp(-2.443379)*sf^3.189581,  exp(-2.443379)*sf^3.713882.
 
Quote
here. I plotted the CI expansions for each VECM snapshot, and then used the last CI for the forecast range.
 
    Source: https://twitter.com/phraudsta/status/1204329006641762304

Source: https://twitter.com/phraudsta/status/1204370743976284160


Interesting...looking backwards, it gives an interesting setup at or immediately after the halving.
We shall see if it repeats itself.
The band is wide enough for btc to be anywhere between 3K and 18K at the halving, though.
However, the lower it would be, the higher is the ensuing "safe" upside potential.
This explains why funds are pressing btc down, since they know about the possible timing of the reversal and the maximum surge potential upon halving. I had observed this before with biotech stocks which are often being moved down just before the 10X gain in a week on relevant info release.

EDIT: BTW, during both previous halving we came out of The "box" at about 30-40% of the box height (slightly below the midline). Projecting the same %% to this halving would indicate about 5-6.5K, which would be annoyingly low, but with a very high profit potential.



1278. Post 53314154 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

I am curious as to what is the price level (low or high) where 70-90% of WO sell the majority of their stake.
It would be an interesting topic to ascertain if people would be truthful in their answers.

The most drawdown in a large cap stock I had ever seen was AMZN from intraday high $113 on Dec 6, 1999 to $5.67 on Sept 24, 2001, almost exactly 95% decline in approx 22 mo.

We already had this kind of decline after the first "bubblette" in 2011, but from a purely theoretical perspective, it would be (in the current cycle) from 20089 on Dec 17, 2017 (using yahoo historical data) to about $1010 sometime in the next 5-6mo (timing is already off).
I know that these are crazy numbers, so I don't even want to give a probability of such event.
In all likelihood the modified planB "box" at the halving between 3k and 18K should hold true.

My last buy was about $7100, so above are just theoretical musings.



1279. Post 53314224 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Real Matic (soccer player) should sue, lol.



1280. Post 53314532 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 11, 2019, 12:09:52 AM


https://twitter.com/BTCarchitect/status/1204497761472786439?s=20

Which road will we follow  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Or something completely different?  Cheesy

Interestingly, both of his scenarios do not violate planB scenario as presented (further analyzed) by @phraudsta:
https://twitter.com/phraudsta/status/1204370743976284160



1281. Post 53348938 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

a-hole is the first thing that forms during human embryonic development [in scientific terms it is called a primary blastopore].



1282. Post 53366487 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

I have to admit that I don't understand current markets, which now include bitcoin as well.
The linear btc chart makes absolutely no sense.
The log chart makes some sense still, not sure how long this would last, perhaps not too long.
The whole "crypto" system is undergoing something of a slow motion collapse in price, it seems, despite nominally positive news.
I am a big btc proponent, but I don't believe that btc would survive if everything else crypto-related completely fails.

The fiat system currently look victorious and marvels at it's ability to "print" money on a whim with nary any consequence, but we all know that it is really a mirage, but in one's lifespan such mirage can last essentially forever.

We shall see. No jerky buying/selling moves.



1283. Post 53366532 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 17, 2019, 04:02:52 AM
I have to admit that I don't understand current markets, which now include bitcoin as well.
The linear btc chart makes absolutely no sense.
The log chart makes some sense still, not sure how long this would last, perhaps not too long.
The whole "crypto" system is undergoing something of a slow motion collapse in price, it seems, despite nominally positive news.
I am a big btc proponent, but I don't believe that btc would survive if everything else crypto-related completely fails.

The fiat system currently look victorious and marvels at it's ability to "print" money on a whim with nary any consequence, but we all know that it is really a mirage, but in one's lifespan such mirage can last essentially forever.

We shall see. No jerky buying/selling moves.



Of course, none of us has any kind of clear theory, but seems that shitcoins can get purged of a decent amount of excessive calue, and could be that altcoin season comes in a different kind of way (and to different shitcoins) than it had come in the past.  

I doubt that a shuffling and purging of value in shitcoins really undermines bitcoin.  There are likely always going to be some shitcoins, but do they really need to not be punished from time to time for their level of dumb?

  You think all that bullshit de-fi and other nonsensical network effects cannot get taught a lesson with their dumbass investing into projects that are built on the foundations of a shitcoin (ethereum 1.0, 2.0, or whatever other phone baloney layers of confusion they are propagating)?

I doubt that bitcoin is going to die from such ongoing and potentially heavy shitcoin purging that also might even purge a decent number of bitcoin investors, too.

Is there a single internet company/stock?
There is no ecosystem consisting of one entity...the only one was depicted in sci-fi "Solaris" (the book, not the US movie, which mostly sucks).
Multiple entities (i don't care how you call them) provide the gamut of ideas on how to move forward. The whole field benefits.



1284. Post 53366706 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: goldkingcoiner on December 17, 2019, 04:44:22 AM
Am I too late for the WO dump panic? I'm sorry, I know its tradition... Cry

*ahem*

OH NO BITCOIN IS GOING DOWN OH SHIT OH SHIT OH SHIT ITS OVER! 3K SOON!!1 *hands start shaking* Roll Eyes



lemme reach for that accidental 100X long/short button... which one would be proven right short term, though?



1285. Post 53373693 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on December 17, 2019, 09:45:57 PM
Good buying right now given we are finally undershooting the fractal.  



Thanks for TA, but it is not a fractal since nothing here is recurring (so far) vs 2015-2017.
Everything is just random move, albeit i can give you one fundamental that was critical, IMHO, in stopping the bull run in the summer and it starts with F, not a T.

BTW, my end of the year game entry is quite possible since we are still descending.
Disgusted by seemingly pitiful year end.



1286. Post 53373938 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Stock to flow reductio ad absurdum

https://twitter.com/digitalikNet/status/1207032051779674112

Around 2041 any schmuck with 0.1BTC is a billionaire, lol.



1287. Post 53373976 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: bitserve on December 17, 2019, 10:49:17 PM
Stock to flow reductio ad absurdum

https://twitter.com/digitalikNet/status/1207032051779674112

I around 2041 any schmuck with 0.1BTC is a billionaire, lol.

Which is the reason stock to flow model does not predict the future price. It just does... until it doesn't.

We would be *extremely* lucky if it does for another cycle.

We would also be lucky to have a model that works as good as stocks/bonds or RE 'models' worked for the last 90-100 years or so.
Right now all btc models are lacking. Maybe the best would be neural network/Deep learning.



1288. Post 53374023 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: kurious on December 17, 2019, 10:52:27 PM
A bit early, but am I looking at a double bottom...

Or is it just the desire to see something to lift my... spirits?



we could bottom at around 5K (optimistically), if we go below 6.1-6.2K.
On the other hand, we can just bounce off of 6.5K and travel north.
I am not sure who is selling a nicely appreciated asset before the year end.
It's not a typical behavior.



1289. Post 53374165 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.09h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on December 17, 2019, 11:37:15 PM
Good buying right now given we are finally undershooting the fractal.  



Thanks for TA, but it is not a fractal since nothing here is recurring (so far) vs 2015-2017.
Everything is just random move, albeit i can give you one fundamental that was critical, IMHO, in stopping the bull run in the summer and it starts with F, not a T.

BTW, my end of the year game entry is quite possible since we are still descending.
Disgusted by seemingly pitiful year end.

No commonality here at all.



Well, if you take an average of two numbers, then the data point would be in between, right?
We had a huge run from 3K to almost 14K in 2019. Nothing like this exists in 2015.
BTW, I am not trying to argue your TA away. I am js that we are in the uncharted waters.



1290. Post 53383096 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

CR7 took his cue from bitcoin...what a crazy jump+levitation. wow.



1291. Post 53392516 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: eddie13 on December 20, 2019, 03:51:39 AM

Are you actually stealing some of my future bitcoin addresses (and Bitserve's too?)

Well you could use them too, be he has the priv keys Smiley

there has gotta be some inability to reuse them too once you generate the addresses, right?  

Nah..
Everyone can still use these keypairs but you won't be the only one that can..

Makes me wonder if collisions are more likely for generated addys..
Prolly not by much enough to make a difference to lowly human technology..




Timestamp:


Could be a long bearish yet ahead, ....  but halving incoming..

<<<<<<<<<<< Notice the last ATH of $1,200 dwarfed...
Over and over and over



I dislike vanity addresses because they actually decrease that particular wallet security.
Re charts-linear charts do look like crap. We should look only on log charts on the longer time period.
I am quite curious as to where we would end up on Dec 31. however, it does not matter much since if we are not going up significantly in the next 10 days or so, the most likely scenario would be bottoming at the lower levels in January.
Still not trading it.



1292. Post 53399988 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: soxxx on December 21, 2019, 01:48:00 AM
I feel like I'm getting deja vu now. It could just be due to alcohol, but what if $6,430 was the low? I remember when $3,130 didn't look like the low either. It also looked like we'd probably go lower, due to the technicals. Now $6,430 doesn't look like the bottom as well. Maybe we don't get obviously defined bottom, yet again.

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/lfSA4LWe-BTCUSD-Measuring-The-Move-of-the-Descending-Triangle-Breakdown/
I've said it multiple times, I think we're going lower, to the $5k area, but that also this could actually be the bottom.
Compare it to the 2014 bear market. It looks a lot like it.



Maybe it does or doesn't, but the timing is all wrong.
I would stick with S2F until it is proven wrong (or not!)



1293. Post 53406839 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

I am curious about this: in a scenario where btc is 100K, how the on-chain fees would look like: $1, $10 or $100? Some are predicting $100.
Presumably, high on-chain fees would move many tx to LN, but i am specifically interested in on-chain fees.
Theoretically, if btc is 100K and you transfer just 0.1BTC, then even $10 fee (which is about 200X current fee) is only 0.1% of the tx value.
Raise the fee to $100 and it is 1% which is getting into vicinity of what we call high fees (like 3% paypal fee or similar credit card fees).

The point I am trying to make is that with $10-100 fees, low value tx (below $1000-10000) would be squeezed and hopefully directed toward LN.
In general, at some point I would suggest to consolidate smaller wallets while the fees are still low. BTW, today 2sats/byte does the job fast, no need to pay higher.



1294. Post 53406913 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

The question is: can we stop it (environmental degradation, etc etc) or are we already on the path that will lead somewhere with less number of people on the planet via all possible negative scenarios. Where I live, the city keeps getting flooded plus getting hit by major hurricanes. People still tend to be optimistic and rebuilt, but it might not be sustainable going forward.
As a result, RE is stagnating a bit with people staying put.



1295. Post 53407142 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: Hueristic on December 22, 2019, 01:22:18 AM
The question is: can we stop it (environmental degradation, etc etc) or are we already on the path that will lead somewhere with less number of people on the planet via all possible negative scenarios. Where I live, the city keeps getting flooded plus getting hit by major hurricanes. People still tend to be optimistic and rebuilt, but it might not be sustainable going forward.
As a result, RE is stagnating a bit with people staying put.

We need to learn how to roll with the punches, continually rebuilding in areas that constantly get swatted is down right stupid and if the Government didn't keep footing the bill then people wouldn't stay in those places. Give them the funds to move not to rebuild, theres a reason places are called shit like Tornado alley!

It's hard to do in areas where things burned down as you can't say: "it will always burn".
flooding-I tend to agree, but then we would have much much less space to live.
Somehow, dutch fixed the flooding problem. It's just the matter of proper engineering.
If such endeavor is expensive, then local gov has to do something.

BTW, WTF is with btctalk posting? It takes like 2 min for a post (at least the first one) to get through.



1296. Post 53415356 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Well, we are at 7514.98 on bitstamp, therefore the 7500 faction won (vs larger 6500 faction) although 6500'ers came very close (on bitstamp).
well, now, if I look at it under the microscope, maybe there was a wick below 6500. Certainly not on coinmarketcap or coinbase, but, whatever.



1297. Post 53415471 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

check it out..

https://www.500headlinesaboutbitcoin.com/

Some are goofy, did not read past 100, sorry.

my favorites: 8, 15, 19, 25



1298. Post 53415486 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: Pamoldar on December 23, 2019, 12:28:31 AM




Bitcoin, always come back strong!

infofront, time to change the pool with something else.

Most logical would be EOY price survey.
A suggestion:

Below 6K
6K-7K
7K-8k
8K-9K
9K-10K
Above 10K



1299. Post 53415493 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: lightfoot on December 23, 2019, 12:38:59 AM
Naah, the survey should be:

The world is flat
The world is hollow

That separates the men from the boys.


if the world/universe is a "hologram", would this count as a flat or hollow?



1300. Post 53416538 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: jojo69 on December 23, 2019, 04:58:45 AM
Well, we are at 7514.98 on bitstamp, therefore the 7500 faction won (vs larger 6500 faction) although 6500'ers came very close (on bitstamp).
well, now, if I look at it under the microscope, maybe there was a wick below 6500. Certainly not on coinmarketcap or coinbase, but, whatever.

6425 is the datum of record

true, although i don't see why you have such piety toward bitstamp.
to me, it's just another exchange, but I'll go with the flow around here UNTIL bitstamp does something stupid with it's low volume.



1301. Post 53416782 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: nutildah on December 23, 2019, 04:50:52 AM
The Bargain Boyz have kicked off the celebration early with some pints of shandy, happy to have loaded up their F-150s with sub $7k corn.
 suspect we won't hear from them in a while, but who knows what will actually happen? To be continued...

F-150s (and GMCs) are my relentless opponents on the highways around here...always driving like maniacs...and ...never...signalling... ANYTHING.
It is truly feels like a battle sometimes with cars whizzing about at 15-20mi above speed limit of 60-65mph (it's not a autobahn, so those limits are mostly justified).
65mph=105 km/h
80mph=129 km/h



1302. Post 53416875 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: jojo69 on December 23, 2019, 07:06:27 AM
well...

gtfo of the left lane man

well
I am never there in the first place, hence the whizzing around...
but...a car or truck is NOT your ball sack to swing around, pal.



1303. Post 53423895 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on December 23, 2019, 11:18:47 PM
I'm pretty confident that not even Bob is going to appreciate that level of gay in appearances.

Look at those faggots. Sacrebleu ! What horrible fashion sense.

it's intentional, no doubt...
almost dadaism II...making fun of showbiz
double translation="showbiz inside out"
maybe trying to be "too clever"

an assigned wardrobe for the 100K party to scare party crashers away? lol



1304. Post 53429802 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on December 24, 2019, 05:46:47 PM
Shitcoiner, nobody, attention-whore, segwit2x traitor and all-round ugly girl has opinions:

1/ there is a very real possibility the price of bitcoin does not go up after halving. for the first time, there is a robust derivatives (futures, options) market for bitcoin. most firms looking to speculate on bitcoin will trade a derivative, not the underlying.

meh, but i agree that she is attention seeking. If halving is the dominant factor, then she would be proven wrong.
What is "real possibility" anyway?
IMHO any short term futures and options players would be taken down a notch, though.

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on December 24, 2019, 05:53:54 PM
Shitcoiner, nobody, attention-whore, segwit2x traitor and all-round ugly girl has opinions:

1/ there is a very real possibility the price of bitcoin does not go up after halving. for the first time, there is a robust derivatives (futures, options) market for bitcoin. most firms looking to speculate on bitcoin will trade a derivative, not the underlying.

...probably bitter she can’t even afford 1 whole BTC so she spends her life trying to manipulate the minds of those who can.

nah, she is somebody at Coinshares, a group with apparently $1bil investable assets.



1305. Post 53430822 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

I was watching Expanse for the first time.
There are some cultural references in that show that might apply here as well.

1. It is unlikely that bitcoin would be accepted by a majority of populace.

2. Accordingly, we need to care more about bitcoin and bitcoiner's than to actively proselytize.

3. Instead, we should try to create our own culture and facilitate this process. Others can join on their own (where and when THEY are ready).

4. Maybe, we should even try to introduce new words/language to help with culture distinction. This is already happening, slowly. Obviously, this is a spontaneous process.

Mind you, it looks like our culture is already under pressure:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6odnm_X0jI



1306. Post 53431405 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

check this out...disappearing stars? That's new.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/303769-astronomers-identify-100-stars-that-went-missing-over-time-for-unknown-reasons

bitcoin is unaffected...unless we are all living in some kind of virtual reality.



1307. Post 53431522 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: Searing on December 25, 2019, 01:15:11 AM

Well, supply will be cut in half, and unless you also believe that demand will be cut in half at the exact same time, price will rise. It's really that simple.

Nope, sorry, I can't see it that way. If it were so, the chart would show a step change in price at the point of halving. Demand is to a large extent already discounting (anticipating) future events, because it is so tied up with speculation. The flows and changes are complex. That's the reason you often see an opposite reaction ( to that expected) when an anticipated price sensitive event happens.

I don't disagree..but I expect a pretty good recession on the horizon. We can dicker on when..but with such a boom in stocks there will be IMHO a corresponding doom in a recession.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/08/19/out-economists-predict-us-recession-by-survey-finds/

I myself have fixed the house, paid off all debts, etc, etc for such an event. If as the experts say now a recession (I expect a good 40% downturn. Keep in mind a recession is a 20%

downturn. Anyway, again, experts say instead of like past recessions to take 7 years to come back they are talking 12 years plus.

With this in mind, even if you are correct on the above, IMHO, adoption will surge, if not in USA and EU in countries that are struggling now using BTC etc.

It is just a matter of what/when to kick adoption in high gear again, it does not have to have anything to do with speculation for this to happen.

Anyway, my bet. (baring a 'black swan' event like Craig Wright being part of the Tulip Trust and actually getting keys..shudder..scared self.....) (joking guys..but still scary as fuck!) Smiley

On horizon, maybe, but how long to the horizon? A year, two, etc.? it could have happened this year, but a Niagara of money reversed it.
I have no idea how long they can continue doing this. Perhaps, years, if not a decade.



1308. Post 53447082 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

I looked at the last 4-5 years on btc vs SP500 and it looks like they are getting more in-tune, plus btc swings vs SP500 are abating.
All data from Dec 31 prior year to Dec 31 next year:

2015-2016  SP500 +9.5%
2016-2017  SP500 +19.4%
2017-2018  SP500 -6.2%
2018-today SP500 +29%

vs

2015-2016  BTC +123.6%
2016-2017  BTC +1368.5%
2017-2018  BTC -73.6%
2018-today BTC +96%

It looks to me that we simply amplify (in the last 4-5 years) the SP500 move.
Judging by the prior statistics, after at least 20% move (yearly) in SP500, there is at least one more consequently positive SP500 year.

Prediction: we would roughly triple or quadruple SP500 gain in 2020.
7-10% gain in SP500 would result in about 30% gain in BTC, therefore the target for BTC next year (12/31/2020) is about 10K+/-1K (9k-11K range).



1309. Post 53448648 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

filbfilb sees around 10K soonish...

https://www.newsbtc.com/2019/12/26/analysis-which-called-bitcoins-drop-6000s-40-rally-ahead/



1310. Post 53448782 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 27, 2019, 12:25:38 AM

I see 7197 right now  Tongue

...and how is your current observation any different from someone else?
LOL



1311. Post 53456735 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

about an alt: people are finally waking up to a basic betrayal of trust...

https://www.trustnodes.com/2019/12/27/the-mystery-of-12-million-eth

Quote
Yet so much remains unknown. Was there a contract? Between who? What were the terms? What were the conditions? Has this contract been breached?

By the letter of it, perhaps not, but in the court of public opinion it certainly has been breached, for that payment was based on the promise of a completed roadmap to Serenity, a promise implicitly or explicitly made by all of them.

They got so much, and instead of exercising their knowledge, even their talent, and perhaps more importantly instead of educating the new generation to pass on skills, they spoil themselves.

what a clusterf--k, but with us pushing 70% in dominance, would not add much.

Quote from: dragonvslinux on December 27, 2019, 10:21:11 PM
The Hash Ribbons indicator is currently signalling a buy. Closing the day at current price would be the first buy signal since January 11th 2019 at $3,632. Shocked

Sorry but had to post again, still can't get my head around this. Most indicators are telling me we're going down. Hash Ribbons is telling me the bottoms in on a long-term scale.



Why do I care about Hash so much? I don't, I care about an indicator that's given 9 signals in 9 years with 100% success rate of calculating post-bottoms in the market (or best accumulation prices). Therefore, if this signal is wrong, it would be part of the 10% unreliable signalling, meaning on a Daily time-frame at least, there is a 90% chance the bottom is in  Shocked

This signal might still work, but there is a simple technical explanation for hashing rate stagnation (or minuscule decline).
The reason is that upon decline from $14K to $7K and simultaneous prior increase in hashing caused by the deployment of new generation miners (starting in about may-June), old trusty S9 miners became mostly unprofitable to run and there was A LOT of them, so it was a multi-month process of switching old gen off and new on. Large miners never do it in one swoop, it is a process.

TL;DR It is was not switching hashing OFF, it was a replacement cycle.



1312. Post 53456800 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: dragonvslinux on December 27, 2019, 10:41:14 PM
The Hash Ribbons indicator is currently signalling a buy. Closing the day at current price would be the first buy signal since January 11th 2019 at $3,632. Shocked

Sorry but had to post again, still can't get my head around this. Most indicators are telling me we're going down. Hash Ribbons is telling me the bottoms in on a long-term scale.



Why do I care about Hash so much? I don't, I care about an indicator that's given 9 signals in 9 years with 100% success rate of calculating post-bottoms in the market (or best accumulation prices). Therefore, if this signal is wrong, it would be part of the 10% unreliable signalling, meaning on a Daily time-frame at least, there is a 90% chance the bottom is in  Shocked

This signal might still work, but there is a simple technical explanation for hashing rate stagnation (or minuscule decline).
The reason is that upon decline from $14K to $7K and simultaneous prior increase in hashing caused by the deployment of new generation miners (starting in about may-June), old trusty S9 miners become mostly unprofitable to run and there was A LOT of them, so it was a multi-month process of switching old gen off and new on. Large miners never do it in one swoop, it is a process.

TL;DR It is was not switching hashing OFF, it was a replacement cycle.

Not relevant. These signals have been back tested pre-ASIC. I'm sure that any TA based miner would be able to pin point the relevant cycles with releases of different models of miners that end up on the market, or others that drop out of the market for that matter, in relation to these capitulation & buy cycles.

Me, I do not care for economics. Only reliable technical indicators. It's signalling a buy and this indicator hasn't been wrong yet, I won't be betting against it for that reason.

TA is voodoo, it NEVER works reliably. Economics of the process is what actually works.
BTW: in the hypothetical surrogate TA observation that temperature is lower in the winter than in the summer (in northern hemisphere) what is more important: the "TA" observation or the knowledge of orbital tilt and planet rotation around the star?



1313. Post 53456849 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: dragonvslinux on December 27, 2019, 10:47:48 PM
TA is voodoo, it NEVER works reliably. Economics of the process is what actually works.

TA is based on probability, that is based on mathematics, 1s and 0s. The latter has been reliably tested for thousands of years. The former, for only a couple of hundred maybe.
Economics is based on a load suits in a room deciding whey think is best to do with their money, at the detriment of anyone else.
My faith in mathematics is inexplicably higher than any moronic human species based intelligence.
Believe what you want, I know what I'll be putting my money on: 1s and 0s.

TA has almost nothing to do with math, it is mostly interpretation of the prior data with Fibonacci numbers thrown in to give it a 'pseudo'-scientific feel.
However, if it works for you due to some 'hidden' parameter that you don't even realize exist, so be it.
Happy trading!



1314. Post 53456893 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on December 27, 2019, 11:00:12 PM
So, let's face it: Lambie was wrong this time too. No $5k no 4k or 3k. Not even $6k dammit! He's so proud of himself for "declaring baby bull market" but how many times since then he was wrong predicting bear moves? There has to be some reason a person predicts bear moves every now and then. The guy is smart, I admit. But to me he's just a smarter version of gembitz. Sorry Lambie fans.   Cool

I've only heard him tossing out the number $5k in the last day... did he do so previously? He just said it won't go to $3k. And I've got news for you: this is $6k. This is it. He's been right about calls he made 3-4 months or so ago, which is better than most can say.

Everybody is a smarter version of gembitz. My comb is a smarter version of gembitz. Yeah I guess I'm a Lambie fan. Oh well, I'll have to learn to live with it.

I guess that you had not noticed that he had been calling for a price correction ever since about early May when we crossed over $6k... So, yeah.. sooner or later he is likely to end up being correct, so that merely makes him entertaining, at best, rather than the soothsayer god-like creature that he would like to have doted upon his attention-whoring little noggen.    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Id say 35 percent chance that was the end and its all up from here. 65 percent chance the B Boyz come out to play at least one more time imo.


If chances are as you described, then Kelly criterion says: no new bet (yet).



1315. Post 53457113 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on December 27, 2019, 11:42:41 PM

via Imgflip Meme Generator

I like your line of thinking about starting a global movement.

I was having a conversation with a buddy recently and we got to talking about peoples jobs being automated away over time.

It occurred to me and I made a prediction to him that the number one job field for women would be sex worker(stippers, whores, porn stars, cam models, happy ending massages, bikini baristas, breastaraunt waitresses, naked sushi girls, go go dancers, etc) in 20 years.

Think about it.... Service industry jobs have already made tons of gains as automation has cut into other types of jobs.

Men due to our larger brain size make the most money and spend the most money and the service we like most is typically sex.

Porn has always been the most searched term on the web.

Women are already spending more and more time on looking and acting slutty than ever before, so its just a matter of time before they all want to monetize their looks and the largest company in the world is one that figures out how to get a multi trillion dollar market cap valuation monetizing the sex worker industry.

Brain size is a louzy param.
Whale has brain size that is 5x human
elephant has brain size that is 3X human.
I doubt that these species are more intelligent.
male/female brain size difference of about 10% roughly corresponds to the difference in body size/weight.

That said, I also noticed the overall increase in "sluttiness" lately (including leggings, etc.), but thought that it is due to increased competition mostly attributed to social networks (Tinder, etc).



1316. Post 53457616 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: pereira4 on December 28, 2019, 01:54:05 AM
So apparently, CSWcoin is going to hardfork in the near future. Said hardfork includes the fantastic idea of basically stealing people's unclaimed BTC, which means, if you didn't claim your BSV, those coins will be "confiscated" by CSW-Ayre's mining operation (which I presume are the only people mining the thing). This also includes that satoshi's "1 million" coins will be stolen. According to raw calculations, they'll get $85million. I mean, it's not a lot, but still, this has to be a joke right? am I taking crazy pills? How is people unironically supporting such thing at this point?

I assume most here didn't even bother claiming the coins. I mean, it's such a pain claiming a forked coins, you have to do much for so little, but I don't appreciate CSW getting free money, but still, I may just don't bother.

If this is not the case, correct me if im wrong on the whole thing, but that is what I extracted from what I've read.

Can you link to highlighted, please?
Apart from rumors, i haven' seen anything solid, as it would be very weird.



1317. Post 53464059 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: mindrust on December 28, 2019, 11:32:00 AM
My term deposit at bank is about to mature after 6 months. I'm getting like $1k for this shitty investment. And what is worse, the interest rates got halved. Next time, I'll be getting like $500 for the same investment at the same bank.

I am making a big decision here:


Option 1: Keep collecting peanuts. Keep DCA'ing.

Option 2: Buy the dip, Keep DCA'ing. (1-2 btc)

Option 3: Nuke everything and become a 1 million club member while I still can. (all in)

*Option 3 violates my investment rules. Violates it like fuck all gimme lambo.






I had done option "3" once in my life when I was much younger. Lost everything in that fiat account, which I since rebuilt to personal ATH, but it took many years.
That said, it depends on several parameters:

1. Your investment portfolio size vs your yearly income
2. Your age
3. How steady you job is (if there is a job).
4. family responsibilities, if any
5. last, but most important-the probability of the trade success (if it could be assigned)

If investment portfolio is small in comparison with yearly income, I don't see why someone cannot invest a large %, providing that the job is steady and you have a good income.

There is a formula (Klein criterion-see wiki) which describes the % of portfolio one should dedicate to a bet.
The problem is-it involves assigning a probability to a trade success, which is almost always an impossible task.
Example: on a trade with 60% success one should invest 20% of the portfolio; trade with 70% success, 40% of portfolio, etc, etc.
Mind you, these %% are "real" numbers, not imaginary ones.
Also, NO MARGIN.

EDIT:
Formula...Fraction of portfolio to invest (in decimals)=[2X(chance of trade success in decimals)]-1
Therefore, 0% to invest when 50:50 (or lower) and 100% to invest when 100% chance of success.
Everything else-in between.

EDIT2 messed up the last name..it is Kelly, not Klein, kudos to Millionero for correction.



1318. Post 53465042 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: d_eddie on December 28, 2019, 07:30:00 PM
There is a formula (Klein criterion-see wiki) which describes the % of portfolio one should dedicate to a bet.
The problem is-it involves assigning a probability to a trade success, which is almost always an impossible task.
Example: on a trade with 60% success one should invest 20% of the portfolio; trade with 70% success, 40% of portfolio, etc, etc.
Mind you, these %% are "real" numbers, not imaginary ones.
Also, NO MARGIN.

EDIT:
Formula...Fraction of portfolio to invest (in decimals)=[2X(chance of trade success in decimals)]-1
Therefore, 0% to invest when 50:50 (or lower) and 100% to invest when 100% chance of success.
Everything else-in between.

Actually, at 50:50 Klein says "invest nothing", right - but if the odds are under 50-50, the Klein criterion suggest the opposite bet should be taken, with an amount again determined by the formula you quoted (it will come out as a negative fraction).

Example: on a bet with 40:60 odds (that's less than 0.5), the criterion suggests 2 * (0.40) - 1 = 0.8 - 1 = -0.2,
that is, invest 20% on the OPPOSITE bet (if anything like that exists).

Thanks, great qualification (re the opposite bet)



1319. Post 53466605 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: Millionero on December 29, 2019, 03:01:32 AM
There is a formula (Klein Kelly criterion-see wiki) which describes the % of portfolio one should dedicate to a bet.
The problem is-it involves assigning a probability to a trade success, which is almost always an impossible task.
Example: on a trade with 60% success one should invest 20% of the portfolio; trade with 70% success, 40% of portfolio, etc, etc.
Mind you, these %% are "real" numbers, not imaginary ones.
Also, NO MARGIN.

EDIT:
Formula...Fraction of portfolio to invest (in decimals)=[2X(chance of trade success in decimals)]-1
Therefore, 0% to invest when 50:50 (or lower) and 100% to invest when 100% chance of success.
Everything else-in between.

Actually, at 50:50 Klein Kelly says "invest nothing", right - but if the odds are under 50-50, the Klein criterion suggest the opposite bet should be taken, with an amount again determined by the formula you quoted (it will come out as a negative fraction).

Example: on a bet with 40:60 odds (that's less than 0.5), the criterion suggests 2 * (0.40) - 1 = 0.8 - 1 = -0.2,
that is, invest 20% on the OPPOSITE bet (if anything like that exists).

Thanks, great qualification (re the opposite bet)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_criterion

The Kelly criterion applies to "simple bets with two outcomes, one involving losing the entire amount bet, and the other involving winning the bet amount multiplied by the payoff odds" (quoted wiki)

The Kelly criterion may be used in investing, but its application there is much more involved than the simple betting forumula.  Wiki has more info.

you're right, bro (re name).
I have some kind of 'last name dyslexia' or something...and I 'infected' d_eddie with it, lol
the formula was right, though.

Darned it, maybe it is another case of "Berenstein Bears" or was it "Berenstain Bears"?
https://news.avclub.com/how-you-spell-the-berenstain-bears-could-be-proof-of-1798282836

<foreboding music>



1320. Post 53482776 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: becoin on December 30, 2019, 09:47:02 PM

... and to Increase Your 2020 Tax Bill?
Only retards will follow such an obvious scam!

In US: so far there is no ruling that wash sale rules apply to crypto...maybe yes, maybe no, more likely no than yes due to ruling that crypto is property and wash sale rule so far SPECIFICALLY applies to stocks and bonds. That said, wait 31 days and no wash sale, even theoretically.



1321. Post 53482876 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: fillippone on December 30, 2019, 09:57:56 PM
The halvening can't be priced in. If the halvening is priced in, is the next halvening priced in too? How about the next 25 halvenings? It's impossible to price in halvenings. The halvening is like a change in physics.

https://twitter.com/RedditBTC/status/1211697573658058759?s=20
I think Plan B answered this paradox many times

In my thread Stock To Flow Model: Modeling Bitcoin's Value with Scarcity there are a few hints about this...

It is interesting that he admits that the model would break sometime in the next three cycles, yet it cannot be priced in, I agree.
I am a bit confused about numbers, as what you attributed to planB is 50K, followed by 400K, followed by a VERY large number that is probably meaningless.
However, lately I saw 100K, followed by 1000K. I think that he tweaked his model later on.
also, what is interesting is the fact that we always exceed theoretical value both going up and down during oscillations, so, I guess, it is entirely possible to go to, say, 150-160K on the upside and back down to 30K on the back slope of that "mountain" in 2022-2023.



1322. Post 53482928 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: Wekkel on December 30, 2019, 10:22:54 PM
I believe the ‘Masterluc’ scenario is also still in play?

The one with broad strokes that predicted the surge to 13-14K following by decline to 6.5, then to 72K (by the tip of the arrowhead)?
Obviously, yes, of course, but I think that he might want to flesh it out for 2020-2021 a bit, although if we get to that tip, I would be perfectly happy.



1323. Post 53483689 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: STT on December 31, 2019, 01:45:48 AM
Overall, you seem quite bearish on upside potentiality of bitcoin.

Yeah, right Roll Eyes Roll Eyes you believe that gold has some kind of significant ability to absorb distressed value merely because it has financial vehicles already vastly in place and developed, but in the end, you really believe that such grandpa coin (referring to gold) is really going to appreciate in value beyond perhaps a 2x or a 3x in the coming years, even in the best of scenarios?


 and the odds are decent too that we could also end up in a supra $150k territory in the same before the end of 2021 timeframe.


I would have to admit I've been way too pessimistic on alot of things over years especially in technology.  I used some of the first versions of Windows and realised 1990 it would be increasingly significant and profitable because it was so usable to the ordinary person in whatever trade, enabling utility far past specialists or specific training; I want BTC to be just the same way.   I did recommend buying MSFT but I underestimated how great that growth might be personally or I'd profited instead of mostly just observing the transition, a relative did buy into a tech fund and gained well over 30 times their initial investment so at least someone was paying attention.   I have tried to pay regular attention to markets ever since because its such a massive part of modern economies.
   Similarly I was user of SETI@home and PGP at the beginning of the century, I think Seti relates for its distributed workload and PGP obviously was something new and disruptive  but I failed to recognise Bitcoin at first for its great potential to ordinary people in bringing them a significant change to their lives.     So again I was too pessimistic initially but now I do think Bitcoin can be useful across the world so long as its able to address ordinary people and give them utility unavailable elsewhere.  FIAT has become unreliable and volatility will be a bull market.  

I've always liked technology but however great BTC or any other innovations might be, it wont be replacing gold in world economies.   I think they are on separate paths, both are required and that will increase but I dont see blockchains as replacing everything only 1 choice among many.   Obviously we are going to see governments continue to favour power they can control, first they will try to replace failed FIAT standards with new FIAT and then finally they might be forced to back money with an actual asset as it once was and its most likely going to be gold or similar.  
  It might be once again I'm not being optimistic enough to see a greater switch to technology but I expect commodities to form the backing to world trade for as long as I'm around.   The digital information global economy does fit Bitcoin and gold is fairly useless for a large part of the world because its so difficult and costly to handle for the common person who is not rich.   I cannot see us going back to solid coin value in the main but I wont say that ceases, for a few maybe its best for them and/or their only option.

BTC at $150k in the next 24 months would involve disorderly markets, I wouldn't bet against it but it means some larger failure is occuring.  We dont get to see only sunshine, if theres a rainbow it'll have also involved a storm imo.
  I dont see the greater price changes occurring for BTC or any asset without similar movement in the world and many asset prices and especially commodities every country is a user of.   I think price changes in a market can be like pushing on string, it doesnt do what anybody wants or expects but I do hope BTC is a large part of ensuring competitive markets succeed where political fixed prices fail to serve capitalism.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jim+rickards+10000+gold

The seemingly ridiculous price objective for gold is $10,000 an ounce, thats by Jim Rickards maths and some others.   I only form my opinions by judging what I read and what seems fair in open markets and I generally agree thats a feasible scenario.    I think its a reasonable target but the price doesnt matter, all that matters is effectiveness of the product to allow an honest working citizen to pay their bills from their wages and save reliably value they have earnt.    Capitalism must serve society or it has no purpose, we dont have capitalism we have a centralised system which is the opposite so whatever the FED is doing now is going to end in unreliability which is a betrayal of those who backed and paid for its existence.   Volcker passed away before Xmas sadly, if anyone remembers his tenure it was a hell of a long time ago both in time and distance policy has fallen.

Why would 7X ATH be a disorderly market?
Similarly, why 10K gold is something out of the ordinary when we had almost 2K before?
In 2000 gold was around $250 or so, then it went up about 8-fold in a decade or so, then corrected for a total of 35-38% during almost a decade.
PTB had printed so much fiat (tens of trillions) than any of the aforementioned numbers are not crazy.
BTC at 10mil/coin, now, this is crazy (for the next 30 years that is).



1324. Post 53488459 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: bitserve on December 31, 2019, 04:15:16 PM

Indeed. Only 2018 was. We have had a nice 2x for 2019. Me is fine.

2019-a strange year by it's dynamics with a "camel's hump" in the middle.
Very unusual.



1325. Post 53490168 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 01, 2020, 12:00:23 AM
I guess this is the decade we had been waiting for.

It’s going to be the 1920s all over again.  

You are optimistic this year. Cheesy

Let’s make it the roaring 20s.  

impossibru (at least for the stock market)... we already increased a lot in the prior 10 years (currently already overvalued for stocks).
In comparison, markets (in US) were correcting from 1916 to 1920 (by about 30%).
https://www.macrotrends.net/1319/dow-jones-100-year-historical-chart

It's entirely possible that we just had OUR roaring 20ies (from 2009 to 2019, SP500 went from 666 lows to 3244 high, 387% up; BTC went up 9000000%).
Bitcoin can go up 1000% in 10 years, more-less likely.



1326. Post 53490198 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.10h):

Quote from: soxxx on January 01, 2020, 12:26:15 AM
20k in 2020
210k in 2021
 Grin

selling to you at 199,999 in 2021, lol



1327. Post 53496127 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on January 01, 2020, 06:45:54 PM
Just to let you guys know

——> this is my 13 000 th post  Roll Eyes

You guys better aren’t bored with me ....  Smiley

love it, just not when you [are] pissed, sorry.



1328. Post 53496264 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on January 01, 2020, 07:05:23 PM
WHEN MOON?




Inside The Cryptocurrency Revolution | VICE on HBO

Sorry, I did not like the video/show.
I wonder, why nobody can capture the essence of bitcoin or crypto as a whole?
This vid is sensationalistic and often wonders in a strange direction, like what some bureaucrats in Tatarstan have to do with a main direction?
Obviously, they are just passengers at best.
Plus, too much VB and undeservedly so.



1329. Post 53496633 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Combine Fred Wilson's (a VC that is involved in crypto) take on 2020'es and the decade-old analysis of who loses and who wins in climate change and you get what?

https://avc.com/2020/01/what-will-happen-in-the-2020s/
https://grist.org/article/we-broke-down-what-climate-change-will-do-region-by-region/

Winners (by region):

NW and North US
Canada
Russia
Scandinavia

Losers:

US South
Coastal regions everywhere (including CA and FL)
Middle east (temperatures would become unbearable)
India (rain patterns would change)
Bangladesh (flooding)
Indonesia

Fred Wilson is very skeptical about US and Europe participation in crypto, sees much more progress in Asia.
I disagree, i think that Europe will be the most interesting region for bitcoin and crypto, but agree that US would become a backwater (as far as crypto development would concern) as much as I would dislike it.

Maybe buying some inland South Canada real estate above 100ft elevation is a good idea, especially now when CAD is weak.

Here is a comprehensive climate report (for US) if someone wants to look at their region (with interesting region-specific info):
https://nca2018.globalchange.gov/downloads/NCA4_2018_FullReport.pdf



1330. Post 53503859 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on January 02, 2020, 10:35:24 AM
Well, yes... happy new decade, as well.



even the new millennium (and century) didn't start with 01-01-2000 but with 01-01-2001.

because year "Zero" does not exist.

perhaps correct, but is conveniently overlooked by 99.9% of the populace.
If you tell someone that new millennia did not start in 2000, but actually started in 2001, they would be very surprised.
Afterall, the year 2000 "bug' was exactly on Jan 1, 2000. That made the mark for most people.



1331. Post 53504415 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: Saint-loup on January 02, 2020, 05:54:04 PM
For 2019 :

• Nasdaq: +33.98 percent
• S&P 500: +30.80 percent
• Dow Jones: +24.23 percent
• Gold: +17.83 percent
• Bitcoin: +96.81 percent
https://www.coinspeaker.com/bitcoin-hash-rate-buy/



Most profitable investments of the decade:

Bitcoin: +62,500%
Ethereum: +17,900%
Netflix: +4,280%
Domino's Pizza: +3,000%
Abiomed: +2,000%
Lululemon: +1,300%
Amazon: +1,250%
NVIDIA: +1,180%
Mastercard: +1,100%
Apple: +840%
Visa: +760%
Google: +350%
https://www.coinspeaker.com/peter-schiff-btc-uncorrelated-asset/




Actual number (according to CNBC) are
SP500  +28.9%
Nasdaq +35.2%
Dow      +22.33%

I don't want SP500 to be smug about more than 30%, hence the correction Wink
Here is to a faint hope that next decade BTC will rally just 1% of the prior decade, which would be....a cool 90000% (OR 7187 to 6475487, lol)
Can we get that small 1% of prior gains? I hope so.



1332. Post 53504465 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: johant123 on January 02, 2020, 07:41:22 PM

In 2021 for sure, I’m not certain of that in 2020 but would love to be wrong.

My feeling as well ... the increase in 2020 is probably modest, but I expect / hope that we reach a new ATH in 2021 or 2022.

Main reason; the cycles are getting more spread out, and the halving is probably more anticipated now than the last time (more energy efficient miners, and so on). So I don't expect any fireworks starting before Q3 / Q4 2020.

I'd love to be wrong as well though, of course!

It would be very nice to hit anywhere between 10-14K in 2020, with the first number being more likely, IMHO.



1333. Post 53515638 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: VB1001 on January 04, 2020, 06:28:19 AM

Quote
A decade of returns sorted by asset class (including BTC).
Thank you to http://www.offthechain.capital  for producing this chart.
https://twitter.com/BrianEstes32/status/1212843876337299463

So, btc was either first (by a mile) or dead last...You never know what you gonna get, but much better chance than even for btc outperformance (so far)

REITs -nice show as well, probably boosted by the RE uptick after the GFC.
Maybe RE is a place to put some fiat in the next few years as stocks might disappoint due to overvaluation.



1334. Post 53515693 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: VB1001 on January 04, 2020, 07:00:55 AM


Quote
Have been asked to expand on this. While we have such limited data during the 2 full cycles thus far we've seen comparable $BTC performance in the 1,2, & 3 years pre-halving. Do we see similar performance yet again the year of and year post which would mean +100% performance? https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1212755833249042432 …

https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1213194896535891969

Although we will have difficult days, I think that every day, month, year, hodlers increase against weak hands and this is a clear sign of consolidation.



I am sorry, but this one has unreliable data:

from 12/31/2014 closing at 320.19 to 12/31/2015 closing at 430.57 is ONLY 34.47% vs indicated (88.1%).
I did not bother to check other numbers.



1335. Post 53520091 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: VB1001 on January 04, 2020, 07:25:27 AM

<...>

I am sorry, but this one has unreliable data:

from 12/31/2014 closing at 320.19 to 12/31/2015 closing at 430.57 is ONLY 34.47% vs indicated (88.1%).
I did not bother to check other numbers.



“Don’t trust, verify”


https://twitter.com/Rptr45/status/1212755833249042432

Now I can't do the check, but I think it refers to this graph.

The guy you referenced just can't do maf.

APY (in %) calculated from monthly returns should be done according to a formula:

APY=[((1+r1)*(1+r2)*(1+r3).....*(1+r12))-1]*100

If monthly reward is, for example 15%, then you get 1.15 multiplier for that particular month, and if it is -20%, then 0.8 multiplier accordingly.
Source: https://financetrain.com/how-to-annualize-monthly-returns-example/

Putting in his monthly (which I don't know if they are right or not) gives me 37% (instead of 88.1) for 2015, which makes much more sense if you compare the EOY numbers.

The common mistake is to equate positive and negative returns.
For example, if you had a -50% month and then a +50% month, you are NOT back to where you were at the beginning, bit lost 25%.



1336. Post 53520962 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on January 04, 2020, 03:51:07 PM
#human activity#

I'm thinking about how to split 1 BTC for future use. if the price will go somewhere to the 1m level I will however be under the radar of large fiat tx monitoring (<10k EUR) by authorities if I have to transfer it to a marketplace.

I'm uncertain about to spilt 1 BTC to 1,000 (0.001) or 10,000 (0.0001) adresses and hold them on a TREZOR.

any thoughts on that from you guys?

EDIT: but I think split 1 BTC to 1,000 adresses (1,000 x 0.001) should be enough.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Address_reuse

too much work for too little benefit, IMHO.
Remembering (or properly storing) keys to all those accounts if paper wallets?
I am not sure that Trezor can manage. It certainly chokes on an account with 1K tx and complains even about an account with 200tx.
BTW, if you make all those accounts on a single Trezor, they are all connected anyway.

Besides, I thought that you are in Germany, where there is NO capital gains taxes on crypto (and no income taxes) if held more than a year.
In US, apparently, one can ID the specific tx for a particular sale, although I am not 100% sure about it (FIFO is typically better).
IN US current long term (held more than 12mo) tax rate is 0-20% (0 for income of less than 39.4K, 15% for 39.4-434.5K and 20% on above 434.5K). Quite reasonable, I should say.
Contact CPA, not a tax advise.



1337. Post 53521044 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on January 04, 2020, 08:09:50 PM
BTW, if you make all those accounts on a single Trezor, they are all connected anyway.

how they are connected from the outside view? you generate 1000 addresses for 1 BTC and split it to 0.001 on every single address with WasabiWallet for example.

I will consider all costs against the hypothetical benefit in the future.

The graph https://blog.trezor.io/wallet-accounts-and-addresses-bdfa6b66b037 is indicative.
A tree. 10 accounts per wallet limit.



1338. Post 53521193 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.11h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on January 04, 2020, 08:21:42 PM
BTW, if you make all those accounts on a single Trezor, they are all connected anyway.

how they are connected from the outside view? you generate 1000 addresses for 1 BTC and split it to 0.001 on every single address with WasabiWallet for example.

I will consider all costs against the hypothetical benefit in the future.

The graph https://blog.trezor.io/wallet-accounts-and-addresses-bdfa6b66b037 is indicative.
A tree. 10 accounts per wallet limit.

I speak about addresses not accounts. BIP032 wallets with as much key pairs you want in it and the public view onto the blockchain.

I say it is a bad idea anyway.
Personally, I don't intend to nickel and dime it.
If and when 1mil..or 100k..or something in between, will transfer a piece to exchange (probably where I bought it in the first place), get cash, pay tax, etc.
However, for pure expense management having a few various size accounts: around 1, 0.1, 0.001, 0.0001btc makes sense (yep, granularity).
Those happen naturally in most cases.
Then, depending on the fiat vs btc, 1btc would be another house, car or vacation vs 0.1btc being a good car, a suit, Oculus Rift, etc.



1339. Post 53581042 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: P_Shep on January 11, 2020, 10:55:02 PM
Just watched The Laundromat on Netflix :
https://www.imdb.com/rg/em_share/title_web/title/tt5865326/?ref
Its about the panama papers leak.

Really interesting and filmed in clever way.

Thanks, i just watched it as well...quite interesting, but to blame it on US (mostly) is a bit strange.
That said, our world is weird in so many ways.

Unrelated:

DCA/JJG's approach epitomized on a website:
https://dcabtc.com/

Choose any strategy you want and see what would have happened.
One thing of note, you had to start either in 2013 or 2014 for DCA strategy to really blossom (of course, earlier than that would have been even better). Example: $250 weekly for 6 years ($78K invested, $828K value); 7 years (91.5K invested, $2377K value).



1340. Post 53588321 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: vapourminer on January 12, 2020, 11:45:30 AM
even newbs know not to say how many big ones they own
even shiny newcomers know not to wear garb that says i heart bitcoin
even noobies know just to say well i try to stack sats
even juniors say oh yeah i had some but then i lost it in a boating accident

i have several bitcoin tshirts i used to wear in public. got some thumbs up and "nice tshirt" comments from people ranging from a door greeter at costco to my one of my MDs. but that was years ago, and i rarely wear them in public now.

sucks really. we are supposed to be supporting btc any way we can, not be afraid of mentioning it.

I sometimes wonder what would happen after we press that "yes" on the new IRS form (which is weirdly worded for starters).
Sounds like a tool to separate the wheat from the chaff.



1341. Post 53589170 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: jojo69 on January 12, 2020, 10:42:00 PM

I sometimes wonder what would happen after we press that "yes" on the new IRS form (which is weirdly worded for starters).
Sounds like a tool to separate the wheat from the chaff.

new IRS form?

https://bitcoinist.com/irs-targets-crypto-trading-and-gig-economy-for-2020-tax-season/



1342. Post 53605368 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Do you guys observe anything else?
It is a very strange day outside of BTC (some alts are going positively crazy).
Anybody has a rationale?



1343. Post 53605763 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

markets overall are behaving strangely today...many small stocks are also up 5% or more.
I think stock market is at the equivalent of January 2000 euphoria stage, blowoff top is imminent within 3 mo or less (maybe after going up another 10-20%). It seems that shorts worldwide are giving up (temporarily).

Personally, i don't like fast moves, but enjoying today.
I think that we "deserve" it after about 6-7 mo of negativity.

BTW, where is HM?



1344. Post 53605825 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: jojo69 on January 14, 2020, 06:48:26 PM

BTW, where is HM?

in my basement

its not water boarding if you use diesel

good one!

<I just wanted to see the "fractal" one more time...>



1345. Post 53606003 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: Phil_S on January 14, 2020, 07:16:39 PM
BTW, where is HM?



where you guys find all this stuff, lol?
nevermind, I already know the answer...interwebs.



1346. Post 53606058 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: infofront on January 14, 2020, 07:22:40 PM
The Bitcoin SV pump is based on the rumor that CSW's bonded courier actually showed up with the final remaining tulip trust key. In other words, that Craig is now in possession of 1 million or so BTC.

https://beincrypto.com/bitcoin-craig-wrights-courier/

yea, I kind of knew it, did not want to poison the atmosphere...
freaking rumor is worth $2.5bil. Talking about market manipulation.



1347. Post 53606125 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: kurious on January 14, 2020, 07:38:25 PM
The Bitcoin SV pump is based on CSW's saying that the bonded courier actually showed up with the tulip trust keys. In other words, he says he's now in possession of 1 million or so BTC (half of which is supposed to go to the Kleimans).

https://beincrypto.com/bitcoin-craig-wrights-courier/

No way it is true - short the shit out of his coin.

Nothing he has said was ever even remotely convincing so far, why would it be now?

someone already did at around 0.24 (BFX).
for a moment here BSV>BCH...just an observation since pre-fork btc contains "the multitude", hence it is somewhat relevant to hodlers.



1348. Post 53606186 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 14, 2020, 07:43:02 PM
Has anybody here ever bought BSV?

Please, be honest guys. I could do with a good laugh.

not me, but from a trade point of view would have been a good move yesterday, lol.
I contemplated throwing a thou on it based on a principle of high risk/high reward (and observing a strange move from $80 to $160), but could not make myself do it. Would have been an easy money for a new PC/Mac, etc.



1349. Post 53606290 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: P_Shep on January 14, 2020, 08:07:54 PM
The Bitcoin SV pump is based on CSW's saying that the bonded courier actually showed up with the tulip trust keys. In other words, he says he's now in possession of 1 million or so BTC (half of which is supposed to go to the Kleimans).

https://beincrypto.com/bitcoin-craig-wrights-courier/

If only there were a way for him to prove that they keys arrived and that he truly is (along with Kleiman) Satoshi.

If only...


You mean prove, cryptographically that he is Satoshi Nakamoto by signing a message?

That’s asking for too much Wink

To be fair...he may not know how to do that.

Can someone explain that to him so he can prove he's Satoshi?

So when he subsequently fails to move any coins or sign any messages, how are the (what are we calling SV believers these days? Morons? Is it morons?) morons going to explain it?


how do you call a con that succeeds in making the con-artist gobs of money....

"The Sting"



1350. Post 53607134 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: jojo69 on January 14, 2020, 10:46:16 PM
nice

BS  V   sold at .042


ca  CHING

typically, one does not sell the first day of the surge (second or even third [early] are usually more profitable), but...well played, sir.
asia might go crazy during their am (in 0-2 hours).

in btc...are we going to get Vegeta tonight...at least 50:50 chance.



1351. Post 53616598 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

https://twitter.com/apompliano?lang=en

Quote
Rumors are circulating that the Fed is going to announce an effort to digitize the dollar this week.

This would be similar to China's effort to digitize the yuan.

IF true, bullish or bearish short term?



1352. Post 53616672 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Can the mass of proton be money?
I don't think so.



1353. Post 53618140 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 16, 2020, 04:49:51 AM
Can you guys please stop talking about completely irrational future gains?

You are spoiling all the fun... were it to occur. Which it won't. Probably. Just no.

Hal Finney already talked about the most outlandish scenario ages ago, so anything lower (like by a factor of 200X lower) might be considered quite rational and very much so. It's not like we are levering to the hilt or borrowing against future 50K btc. The only problem I see is that btc never allows for a nice 1-2 mo flat top distribution.
It always produces a super spike up followed by the 50% down in a few days or a couple of weeks.



1354. Post 53625559 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: dragonvslinux on January 16, 2020, 11:38:26 PM
If I had to title this TA, it'd be called "The bearish case is becoming increasingly difficult to argue"



VPVR since $8K breakout in November 2017 says we are above the median volume line.
Closing above the $8350 level this week would look uber bullish on this indicator.

Funny...someone could have gone sailing around the globe since Oct-Nov 2017 (with no internet) and miss the whole lot of excitement.
Fortunes were made and lost.




1355. Post 53625625 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 17, 2020, 12:08:14 AM
If I had to title this TA, it'd be called "The bearish case is becoming increasingly difficult to argue"



VPVR since $8K breakout in November 2017 says we are above the median volume line.
Closing above the $8350 level this week would look uber bullish on this indicator.

Funny...someone could have gone sailing around the globe since Oct-Nov 2017 (with no internet) and miss the whole lot of excitement.
Fortunes were made and lost.

Suggestion for a poll: what % of your bitcoin you would sell for fiat or other investments at btc=50K (or 100K, but 50K looks more realistic right now):

None
0.1-10%
10-20%
a third
half
3/4
All

Personally, I believe that is NOT a fair question because any BTC price is a product of where it is and how much time it takes to get there, so to be fair, we need a time.  February 2020?  October 2020?   October 2021? October 2024?  or some other date?

the poll idea was premature anyway (for some reason i thought that today is already 17th), so I deleted it while you were typing.
Disconnecting and proceeding to watch "Dark"-first couple episodes were meh, will try one more and see if it picks up.



1356. Post 53632828 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 17, 2020, 04:47:34 PM
I have a dream, that the next time we cross $9,000, it will be the last time we ever see Vegeta memes.

I'll drink to that!



1357. Post 53633040 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 17, 2020, 07:00:24 PM
I have a dream, that the next time we cross $9,000, it will be the last time we ever see Vegeta memes.

I like Vegeta memes. But I'm with you on this one. I want moon memes.

I’m looking forward to when we break the ATH. The memes, excitement & joy here will be great to see. It’s going to be biblical.

This thread will be part of bitcoin’s history. We’re like characters in the Bible, people will speak of our usernames in the distant future Wink

in such case, people should not change their usernames on a whim Wink



1358. Post 53633716 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: fillippone on January 17, 2020, 09:30:16 PM
Another hit from PlanB!

Very interesting. And answering one of the most common question: why Bitcoin is still at Vegeta level if it is going to be worth in the million in a few years?

Efficient Market Hypothesis and Bitcoin Stock-to-Flow Model

Quote

Bitcoin Stock-to-Flow (S2F) model was published in March 2019 [1]. The model has been well received by bitcoiners and investors. Many analysts have verified the cointegrated S2F model and confirmed bitcoin price predictions [2][3][4].
The S2F model also received critique. The best steel man argument against the model comes from the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). The argument states that the model is based on publicly available information (S2F, bitcoin's supply trajectory) and therefore the analysis and conclusion must be already priced in.
In this article I share my point of view on S2F model and EMH. I analyze arbitrage opportunities, risk & return model and derivatives markets.


Are you guys following him on twitter?
I literally was checking his account a couple of min ago and it was not there yet.
Interesting point about mispricing due to high perceived risk.
Steel man argument is the opposite of strawman, but it is the first time I saw this expression.



1359. Post 53633835 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: Hueristic on January 17, 2020, 09:41:01 PM
Apparently there's 2.1BTC hidden in this picture:



Source Don't forget about me whoever finds it Wink

I saw ETH and XRP and eyes glazed over. fuck that shit.

Dude, this is a puzzle (with imaginary Satoshi face) to get 2.1 BTC, who gives what words are there?



1360. Post 53634072 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 17, 2020, 07:35:15 PM


Nice...had to check "codpiece".

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 17, 2020, 10:41:51 PM
Well, I had to cash out an entire bitcoin yesterday for expenses and such. This is why it's going over 9k.

Because the universe rotates around me, and the universe enjoys fucking with me :-)

So moon time! Every time I sell one that is one bitcoin I will never see again. Blah!

First sell yourself on the streets or something, if the juices or completely gone there.... then start selling corns

Anyone who earns an income in bitcoin will have to sell some bitcoin.  That is risk management 101.

Each person needs to maintain balance, and lightfoot has previously described that periodically he receives some income in BTC.


well, some peeps here might want to indulge in some mining activity...it's not that difficult and makes income in BTC, lol.



1361. Post 53634147 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 17, 2020, 10:58:22 PM
I was staring at my DCA chart as I always do everyday Grin, I realized, since 2016, I doubled my BTC amount every year.  Cool

I can only double one more time that's if I go all in.  Grin

Don't get caught up on unrealistic pie in the sky goals.

Consider your prudence, and you don't need to double each year in order to be employing the correct tactics.  

In other words, if you start to prioritize meaningless goal posts, you will end up screwing up a system that you have built and figured out to work.

In other words, tweaks to your system should be based on incremental changes rather than throwing darts at walls when you might not be as good of a shooter as you believe yourself to be, then you end up getting fucked up the ass because you accidentally (or should we say recklessly?) poked ur lil selfie in the eye ball.    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I probably bought my last fucking dip a week ago.

From now on unless there happens to be a huge ass percentage drop, I'll just keep throwing potatoes (DCA'ing) till it hits my target price.

There is never a straight up, so maybe if you are employing "buy on dip," you are not getting as much BTC, but you still cannot really count on losing dip buying opportunities.

Yeah, I understand that many of us here in WO thread have a kind of bullish, never to return to low prices theory, yet historically, it seems that those kinds of opportunities do still tend to come...

Maybe we could analogize from 2016, and yeah after a certain point, it became really difficult to obtain sub $500 coins.. and surely similar dynamics might exist in 2020.. trying to get sub $10k coins... I understand the dilemma and the urge to front load, and I have no problem with the employment of some front loading based on those kinds of ideas.  I did it myself.  I front loaded a bit in the three digits, but I was still always worried about front loading too much and getting caught in some kind of pickle...

Yeah, of course, I left some money on the table in 2015 and 2016, but I don't have any regrets because I really feel that I had front loaded as much as I had felt comfortable at that time, and I cannot go around kicking myself and say that I should have bought more - because buying more was just NOT prudent when I had already sufficiently thought about the situation and sufficiently frontloaded my BTC investment.  There is only so much that you can do and there is only so much money that you can reasonably get a hold of without putting yourself too much at jeopardy if matters were to go sour.. and my lack of regret even goes to the fact that I could have pulled some money out of my 401k.... it was my money.. but I chose not to do it, and the 401k money performed way worse than BTC.. but I don't care because I had already considered both the UPs and DOWNs and I made my then choices about what was then prudent..  No regrets, here.

front loading is so 2014-2015ish.
It's difficult to imagine a serious frontloading at almost 9K (vs 200-500 back then).
It is closed to most, but the fiat 1% now, soon to be 0.1%.
That said, i believe that the next 5-6 mo is the last frontloading opportinity of the next few years.



1362. Post 53634328 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: Searing on January 17, 2020, 11:34:05 PM

P.S.: At least I am not a completely delusional fool like this one: https://beincrypto.com/bitcoin-will-reach-400000-after-halving-history-dictates/

That is just absurd.  Obviously we are only going to experience an 11,000% increase this time around peaking at $343,453.

I agree he is a delusional fool...however, one does not have to believe in "Peter Pan", to secretly have the desire for Peter Pan and NeverLand to exist!

So he can be as frigging 'delusional' as he wants to be, I sure hope he is right, on this fricking $400k BTC price after halving, however!

(Ah daydreams...how I stay sane!) Smiley (Also makes my odds much better to become Natalie Portman's Love Puppet!..you mean there is a chance?)

Those mighty sells/withdrawals would be hard.
Personally, i still don't exactly grasp how it could be done, even if btc comes from an exchange and everything is documented.
Apart from anecdotes from one obvious person here, i never heard about the upper limit of wire/ACH from Coinbase (Pro or regular) and gemini (Gemini does not tell you what the limit is outright). Therefore, even if i wanted, i wouldn't know what limit to ask for. Obviously with these crazy numbers (300-400K/btc), withdrawal limits have to be very high in $$. I am afraid that it could become a bottleneck later on when millions of people start bombarding them with such requests.



1363. Post 53635255 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Why are we paying so much attention to a clearly peripheral issue?
Everybody knows that @jbreher likes BSV. So what? He does not force anyone to buy it, just states his opinion (infrequently).
I think that he is mistaken, but it is just an opinion.
Some guys like pussy and some like something else, #nohomo.

All this lambasting a fellow WO member is for naught and kind of sad to see.
Reminds me of a conflict between bolsheviks and mensheviks or going even more "satirical/historical", Lilliputians and Blefuscudians.
Quote
All Lilliputians should break their eggs on the small end first.





1364. Post 53635350 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: Icygreen on January 18, 2020, 04:43:55 AM
I know we touched on the new US tax question recently but I hadn't considered this point of view which I tend to agree.

Quote
Opinion: The IRS will cause significantly more adoption of bitcoin.

Going forward, all taxpayers will be required to answer the question below:

This question will force all taxpayers to contemplate the existence of cryptocurrency as an asset class.

This also forces accountants, attorneys, and financial advisors to educate themselves on the subject in order to represent and advise their clients.
The question will inevitably nudge some of the tens of millions who are exposed to it, and who are curious,  to explore this new asset class.

Once curiosity sets in, it is guaranteed that Bitcoin’s gravity will draw many of these newcomers down its rabbit hole.
This amounts to a guerrilla marketing  campaign by the IRS, and it can only lead to increased interest in and adoption of bitcoin, IMO.

I do not believe this is the intent of the question by any means, but I cannot see how the increased awareness will be a net negative.
https://twitter.com/sixpointonefive/status/1218348953197899776?s=20

gamers would be like...."Dude, are gps virtual currency or not?".

Quote from: jojo69 on January 18, 2020, 04:44:37 AM
so much for the ZEC pump

Still 100% up from Dec 31, js
Crazy stuff.



1365. Post 53640004 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: mindrust on January 18, 2020, 02:46:56 PM
https://old.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/eqblby/daily_discussion_saturday_january_18_2020/fepviu9/

This guy has a different view I guess. I too think $100k would be max price this time but what if...

Quote
So last year I made a prediction last year on January 1st. I don't think I did too bad. I thought we would bang on 6k a lot more and not just rocket through it. I thought we would double in price for the year, which we did. We just made a little pit stop to 13k first before coming back down and ending the year at 7k.

This year I think we'll double in price again to 14-15k. However, if we have another mini bubble like last year it could put us above 20k price, in which case all bets are off. If we don't break 20k I think we could bounce off of it, something like this. It would look like a big C&H on the weekly which is, of course, a bullish formation.

I've been lurking for a while here and I see talks of the next bubble. My own baseless long term speculation of the next bubble is probably a lot higher than others, which I find interesting. Many are expecting 70k to 100k and unless the long term prospects of bitcoin are already topping out then I feel that is a very low estimate. Generally bitcoin will do about 10x from the previous bubble top, which points to the next top being around 200k. I think it will get to at least that next bubble, with a higher, but less likely, target of 250k.

In fact that will lead to the perfect bubble catalyst, the overtaking of gold's market cap. If bitcoin's market cap = gold's then it would put bitcoin at 380,000 USD/coin. I guarantee you those will be the headlines that will cause the frenzy for the next bubble. "BITCOIN TO BECOME THE NEXT GOLD?" "BITCOIN IS THE NEW GOLD" "NEW ECONOMIC PARADIGM" "BITCOIN TO 1 MILLION USD?" When you see those headlines start to pop up as bitcoin hits 250k, you know that will be the top. That's your sell signal everyone. Don't miss it.

As for the bottom of the next bubble, I hope that bitcoin becomes more stable as time goes on and therefore retrace less. I still expect a big retracement from the top of the next bubble but I hope it doesn't go more than 60%. Even 70% would be harsh. If we have another 80% retracement it will leave me scratching my head as to why it isn't becoming more stable, but I'll still buy back in hard for the next bubble to 1million usd. I'll buy heavily from 100k and below.

Also, I think after this next bubble it will take longer to hit new highs and each subsequent bubble will be smaller in terms of % than the previous. Right now we are on a 4 year cycle, but I think that will increase to 6-8 years cycles. And if you take 250k as the top then to 1million that will only be 4x increase compared to the previous 10x. Smaller bubbles become more likely as the market becomes saturated. Long, long term, like decades in the future, bubbles will becomes obsolete and gains will be limited to a few % a year.

Well, that was a fun wall of text. Have fun trading everyone. I'm still just hodling and won't post that much anymore. Should be a fun two years!

According to moonmath $200k is in the realm of possibilities. (for the next 2 years)

$400k's possibility starting to become reality only after 2024.

Actually, eighty something %% decline this time left me scratching my head as well.
I fully expected that the decline would be less (60-70%) in the current cycle, yet we still went like a yo-yo.
Actually, it was a few percentages less than prior, but only a few.
94% ($32 to $2) first cycle, 86% second cycle (1160 to $160), 84% this cycle (19870 to 3100).
You can see that draw-dawn got slightly lower, not by much.
Hence lies the problem. If we keep popping up lower gains (in %) in each cycle (320000% to 57900% to 12400% to, say, 2655% in the upcoming), but always declining in the % of gains, but keeping draw-dawn high at or above 80%, then, inevitably, and quite soon, we would have a reverse cycle where we increase less than subsequent drop and that would be a devastating picture.
BTW, 2655% increase (keeping with lower increase trend) in the upcoming is projecting to $82K.

TL;DR So far, each cycle the drop is above 80% and changing very slowly, but gains are declining more rapidly (in %) each cycle, suggesting that at some point relatively soon we would have a down cycle (in the next one or two).



1366. Post 53641021 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on January 18, 2020, 11:29:29 AM

My beloved Tulsi's campaign has fizzled out for the most part but many Presidents had to run multiple times to win.

If by some miracle she did win we could hold the 100k party with a full Secret Service detail. I would have her make the NSA scrub all data about our pasts from the internet for those who wanted it. Then she would give all US citizens who attended the party secret IRS lifetime tax exemptions for national security reasons and also full lifetime diplomatic immunity. Non US citizens would be offered full citizenship and IRS lifetime exemptions if they wanted. We could then form a government funded "Think Tank" and just meet each year to have lavish parties at the governments expense while we drafted recommendations for Madame President on how to proceed with monetary policy and a list of all Bitcoiners to be fully pardoned.



Right...I want to be the secretary of education, though since..wait, I need to focus my eyes.
https://youtu.be/OoZ1-xPbNHg?t=19

President's role is a tossup between The dude, Bob and V8 (mysterious and vague).



1367. Post 53641106 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

heck, we can do better...a WO wonderful hatcoin (WOW or WOH).

The number of coins is limited to xhomerix -issued (he is the treasurer).
Should be no more than 100-150 so far, a few more later. This is a strict one hat-one token situation (collectible).
Or, maybe one hat gives you 10-100 coins so it is somewhat more liquid, so you can give your heroes a coin or two.
Could be a sidechain if we don't want ERC-something.



1368. Post 53644239 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: Icygreen on January 19, 2020, 02:01:18 AM
Good morning WO's, Indeed it is over $9000 looking at 9155 and climbing. This is fine.
Tet is coming soon and the karaoke parties are starting. I'm expecting prices to follow the celebrations of the next 10 days.
Friends and atmosphere all in place.  Here's a shot of our back yard currently. Any sleuths out there find this? Shouldn't be terribly difficult.




Blue Lagoon, Thailand?



1369. Post 53650366 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: eddie13 on January 19, 2020, 08:33:38 PM

Serves that douchebag fiat paper shill right..

I agree with description, but wallet management is tough, especially if you did not use the wallet for a few years.
We think that we remember/record everything right, but sometimes we make mistakes (especially if trying to memorize something).
Memory plays games from time to time.



1370. Post 53651204 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 19, 2020, 09:11:38 PM

I agree with description, but wallet management is tough, especially if you did not use the wallet for a few years.
We think that we remember/record everything right, but sometimes we make mistakes (especially if trying to memorize something).
Memory plays games from time to time.

Anyone who is interested in getting into BTC should get a hardware wallet and follow the instructions. Schiff wouldn't have had to tweet that if he had.

I dunno. If he can't retain a single password, how is he going to retain a 24-word recovery phrase?

exactly. 24 words written on the enclosed paper...someone was recently checking the wallet, left it on desktop....cleaning lady was vacuuming, piece of paper flew down on the floor, she puts it in trash. Several days later.."where is that very important piece of paper that I left right here?
"I dunno, mister, I clean".



1371. Post 53651402 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.12h):

Quote from: fillippone on January 19, 2020, 11:37:21 PM

I agree with description, but wallet management is tough, especially if you did not use the wallet for a few years.
We think that we remember/record everything right, but sometimes we make mistakes (especially if trying to memorize something).
Memory plays games from time to time.

Anyone who is interested in getting into BTC should get a hardware wallet and follow the instructions. Schiff wouldn't have had to tweet that if he had.

I dunno. If he can't retain a single password, how is he going to retain a 24-word recovery phrase?

exactly. 24 words written on the enclosed paper...someone was recently checking the wallet, left it on desktop....cleaning lady was vacuuming, piece of paper flew down on the floor, she puts it in trash. Several days later.."where is that very important piece of paper that I left right here?
"I dunno, mister, I clean".
After the boatin’ accident and the kebab incident, we now have the vacuum incident

Kebab incident...what was that?
It sounds funny already.



1372. Post 53657814 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: bitserve on January 20, 2020, 09:21:08 AM
My advantage is that health is dirt cheap here. Doctors are literally working for free. I better get a 2nd passport but still keep my original in case I have a serious health problem.

I do also have a GREAT and almost FREE health care here. In Spain $1-$2 million would probably be the equivalent of that $5million for US. Again, depends on many factors.

And yes, one could go with a lower figure if he already has a home, retirement pension, additional income, less years to live, very frugal lifestyle, etc etc...

But the geographical factor is *EXTREMELY* important.

Fortunately I plan to always live here. Not just because of "cost of living" but QUALITY of living... and WEATHER! *Most* of the world (including many parts of my damn country!) is too fucking cold for my taste.

Now you mentioned Spain, I was actually considering of buying 2 x 500k€ flats in Barcelona and AirBnb the fuck out of them.  Grin

Work while having a vacation. Sound like a brilliant idea.

Not the best of the ideas. Touristic apartments are having a regulation tightening specially in Barcelona. Risky business I would say. You might be earning like a boss this year and the next one be out of the market because of some regulation that forbids you to rent it. In fact that is ALREADY happening.

Also Barcelona (and Madrid) and among the most expensive cities to live in Spain. Higher salaries yeah, but if you are not gonna work there you will just "enjoy" the higher cost of living. Still, WAY lower than US, of course.

About renting... currently the best investment are more "modest" 2-3 room apartments valued from 50 (reform usually needed) to 250K (more premium zones) € that you can rent for 5-10% that. Long term, so hassle free.
Or lousy apartments with many rooms near universities that you can rent to students.

It's a job in itself to take care of your "business" and properties but it's a reasonably safe investment with a good return if you know what you are doing.

Congrats for ranking up, @bitserve!
Can someone living in Barcelona or Madrid afford the season tickets?
That's the question, Wink



1373. Post 53657893 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 20, 2020, 02:52:41 PM

I am not exactly saying you need $5 Million to live in the US.

$5Million is my *UP TO* / most conservative reasonable figure for living with a NICE lifestyle in the US. It includes the following factors:


If $5million is your goal, then you need

BTC price                                           BTC quantity

$5k - (anticipated lowest, currently) = 1,000 BTC

$8,600 - (today's price, while typing) =  581.4 BTC

$10k - (reasonable extreme bottom price in 2 years) = 500 BTC

$25k - (reasonable extreme bottom price in 5 years) =200 BTC

$100k - (reasonable extreme top price within 2 years) = 50 BTC

$250k - (reasonable extreme top price in 5 years) = 20 BTC

I personally believe that $2million is decently enough because that gives you $6,666 / mo of passive income.  We should be considering average USA locations rather than the extremes of NYC or SF... .. of course, the higher the cost of living of your preferred location, the more that you need.

By the way, we should also know that BTC does not need to be your exclusive source of income or assets in order to still serve as "fuck you" money and also to be calculated while considering the balancing of other assets and possible income that you might have from other sources that would not necessarily interfere with your ability to claim to have reached a kind of "fuck you" status

I agree with a notion that 2mil is still probably OK in most of US (not in NY, SF, San Diego, San Jose and several more), but $5 mil is solid as a "FU money" (updated to $5mil from $2.5 mil) described here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGC9FY65HBo

haiku motif that I stole from you know who:

Yesterday, corn was
such an easy game to play..
oh oh...yesterday



1374. Post 53658120 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on January 20, 2020, 05:41:25 PM
Nice..

Quote
Bitcoin Energy value just hit an all time high.

The network is stronger, and more valuable, than ever before.


Source: https://twitter.com/caprioleio/status/1219196321892052992

Network is stronger because of peeps like vapourminer, Searing, etc perhaps still buying and running those incredibly loud machines.
Personally, I feel that people might think of contributing by running a regular node, mining and/or running a LN node.
I love speculation, don't take me wrong, but we need to fight (still) for decentralization.



1375. Post 53658942 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: OROBTC on January 20, 2020, 07:07:01 PM
Breaking News:U.S. Congress proposes that Crypto transactions below $200 shall be free from taxes!.

Quote
139 G.Gain from disposition of virtual currency

(a)In general
Gross income of an individual shall not include gain, by reason of changes in exchange rates, from the disposition of virtual currency in a personal transaction (as such term is defined in section 988(e)). The preceding sentence shall not apply if the gain which would otherwise be recognized on the transaction exceeds $200.

(b)Virtual currency
For purposes of this section, the term virtual currency means a digital representation of value that is used as a medium of exchange and is not otherwise currency under section 988.

pdf



That would be great if that goes through.  I have made a few small purchases that have been annoying to keep track of (esp. cost basis for coins, I use FIFO accounting).  The larger purchases (gold) I kept careful track of because they were larger transactions.

Tiny purchases with BTC should be tax-free, the man-hours of doing the accounting are maddening.


even if congress passes it (I doubt it), POTUS would surely veto it (on advise of Sec Treas).

Quote from: gentlemand on January 20, 2020, 07:56:35 PM
I’m really not happy at the thought of paying 20%, that sucks man. Why should I pay so much money when the majority of my coins were bought for so little.

The government does not deserve to take so much from us.

It is what it is. I priced it in from the off. And it can be much, much worse in other places. Ireland's 33% I think.

If I change my mind I have my eyes on this palace - https://www.rightmove.co.uk/overseas-property/property-88276847.html?currencyCode=GBP  but need to get my skates on before going abroad results in gammons stoning you to death.

yea, in US it is similar (up to 20%) on longer term cap gains. 10% would have been more decent, but, whatever.
Brits have one up on us with all that offshoring business. No such thing (except weird Puerto Rico situation) for US citizens.
IF you love that future extra 15-20% so much that you want to live in PR at least 183 days/year, then...
I won't.



1376. Post 53659071 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Where is the world it is pleasantly warm, but not hot at least 8-9 mo/year?
A sea and or a lake is required, preferably english speaking (at least in a large part) populace.
I cannot think of anywhere apart from few small places in The Caribbean, with a threat of hurricanes, etc.
I've been through several hurricanes already, it's a thing to avoid if possible.
Without considering language, I was also thinking about Greece (including Corfu), some Mediterranean islands (Crete, etc.), maybe Canary islands.
Maybe I should learn Spanish or Portuguese, finally.

Suggestions?



1377. Post 53659142 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 20, 2020, 08:31:55 PM
I thought this had been settled years ago.

It's Jaywick of course.

Sun, sea, affordable property, 'community spirit' which is important as you get older and all a short hop from London.



The ocean is just over the concrete wall at the end.

Well, every city or surrounding city has a similar area.
That's not what I saw when I visited England, mostly London, but been to Amersham as well-nice little city, very green and pleasant.
Did not get the obsession about the 200 year old (or older) houses to live in, but I guess that it is a "preservation" spirit.



1378. Post 53659341 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: infofront on January 20, 2020, 09:08:14 PM
Haha!

I was looking at living costs in The Philippines earlier. I thought about nutildah (no homo) & had a little look.

It’s so fucking cheap.

I refuse to move anywhere sweaty. And though I don't know how sweaty it is there it's certainly close enough to other places filled with people sweating to raise my suspicions to Defcon 1.

I could buy a rotating army of small Filipinos to sit in fridges and then run out and press themselves against me until they warm up, but I think I'd rather stay put and incur a bit more expense.


I was just there for three weeks recently. The cost of many goods is higher than the US. So unprepared food, unless you buy in-season produce, will cost a little more. However, services are so cheap they're almost free. So the cost of prepared food will be much cheaper.

I can't emphasize how cheap human labor is there. I had a manicure-pedicure for $3 (my wife insisted). An excellent haircut for $1.20. Massages are around $4-$5 per hour. We had a couple plumbers doing repairs on my wife's house for about 1.5 days, and it was $35, including parts. So, services are all basically 5%-10% of the cost here.

Very sweaty when you leave an air conditioned space, however.

imagine being a bitcoiner there when btc strikes 100K.
It would probably feel like you are Mansa Musa, spreading the wealth where you travel, causing intense inflation in local services, lol.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wealthiest_historical_figures



1379. Post 53659552 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: kurious on January 20, 2020, 09:37:22 PM
[Snip]

The most bizarre thing is that what was once thought of as shit social housing is actually vastly more liveable than what's billed as an exciting modern executive luxury new build development.

A 1930s council house is rock solid and bursting with space and storage.

Social housing in the UK has always had regulations, like minimum room size requirements.  

New private builds have no such crazy and outdated rules.  So you can have what are effectively broom cupboards that are described as single bedrooms, even though you can only get a single mattress in there if it's placed vertically.

Basically you can't afford to be poor in the UK. That is if you want to buy a home with an actual decent horizontal bedroom with enough room for a shag in.

The solution is simple: people just need to become smaller in size.  /s





1380. Post 53686746 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: Elwar on January 23, 2020, 10:48:16 PM
Just had an idea about seasteads:
Would it be possible to adjust the floats to let a "basement", having the shape of a half sphere or bowl, made of transparent material, sink a few yards into the ocean?
So that the "ground level" of the living compartment is about at sea level, and you could watch what happens below in a 360° view from the "basement"...

One key to the spar design is that the less surface area at the surface the better. This is where the waves are crashing against your seastead. Ideally they would meet a thin pole, 1mm thick holding your house above it.

As it is, that would not support any structure so we have opted for a steel tube 1.6m wide. We could make it smaller but we want it to be easy for people to walk down a spiral staircase into the spar so they can reach the underwater room with views like this:



Calling Captain Nemo?



1381. Post 53693854 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: martyMC on January 24, 2020, 09:47:37 PM
Why it would go up please? I don't understand...

Cos it's BTC.
What do you mean? It's something that goes up with no reason? Till which level?

A deflationary currency in an inflationary economic model should increase in value infinitum.
Why Bitcoin would be indefinitely deflationary?  Huh I don't understand.
It was deflationary only because its price and its market were growing. But now that almost everyone on earth has heard of it, there is no reason for growing and being deflationary anymore.

That's NOT what it means to be deflationary.
It is deflationary because the unit number is limited to 21 mil max issued and that number is already smaller and decreasing because of the losses (lost wallet, thrown away hard drive, etc.). Lost bitcoin is not being replaced. In time, total number of accessible units will be declining, hence deflationary.
However, right now it is still mildly inflationary. Currently, btc inflation is about 3.6% on a yearly basis, will drop to less than 1.8% in May.



1382. Post 53693944 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: martyMC on January 24, 2020, 10:00:17 PM
A deflationary currency in an inflationary economic model should increase in value infinitum.
Why Bitcoin would be indefinitely deflationary?  Huh I don't understand.
It was deflationary only because its price and its market were growing. But now that almost everyone on earth has heard of it, there is no reason for growing and being deflationary anymore.

That's NOT what it means to be deflationary.
It is deflationary because the unit number is limited to 21 mil max issued and that number is already smaller and decreasing because of the losses (lost wallet, thrown away hard drive, etc.). Lost bitcoin is not being replaced. In time, total number of accessible units will be declining, hence deflationary.
However, right now it is still mildly inflationary. Currently, btc inflation is about 3.6% on a yearly basis, will drop to less than 1.8% in May.
If it's still "inflationary" as you said, it doesn't explain its growth then.

The network size increase explains "growth" (Metcalf's law).



1383. Post 53694809 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: Searing on January 25, 2020, 01:02:43 AM
Anybody follow @satoshi_babe on Twitter?

Well worth a wank look!

https://twitter.com/satoshi_babe




Even with BTC I'm fairly sure I could not 'afford' @satoshi_babe. One must know one's limitations. I'd pull something and die.

Much like the male praying mantis..debating now internally on if it would be worth it....hmmm....goodbye 'cruel' fiat-based world!

sorry..wandered into a daydream...happens often...

Still, a possibility.



1384. Post 53701768 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on January 25, 2020, 10:16:46 PM
plate of rocks?

Rocks bro

A silicon-based life form could eat those, then excrete sand as it 'breathes'.



1385. Post 53702356 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 26, 2020, 01:33:11 AM
asymptomatic transmission

we're all gonna' die

yes ... and some reports from scientists inside Wuhan hospital of 14% fatality rates, not official 3% rate ... this thing is off the charts bad ass, they should have quarantined China 2-3 weeks ago, and still mutating, one hope is later strains will be less deadly/virulent  Roll Eyes

global economy is going to take a hammering over next 3-6 months

is it too cynical to short some stocks? on one hand, maybe yes, on the other hand, it is just a number. Most companies are not really hurt by fluctuations of their stock price. Longs can also be found.



1386. Post 53702587 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 26, 2020, 02:43:53 AM

is it too cynical to short some stocks?

We're putting everything in canned food and shotguns.

If this things R0 is near 4 as some fear, and it kills at a rate of 14% this could be a very big deal.

... best numbers/info I can gather from various sources, with uncertainties:

- R0 between 1.4 - 3.8
- lethality between 3 - 14%
- asymptomatic transmission/incubation period 9 - 14 days  (carriers could be out there spreading it for 5 days 2 weeks after catching it!!, fux)
- transmission mechanisms include bodily fluids (blood, saliva, etc) or aerosols (coughing, sneezing, farting, ejaculation, etc) contracted through respiratory or eyes, etc ... no reports of airborne yet.
- terminal phase is organs overwhelmed, pneumonia (drowning in lung fluids)

I could opine on the last item...it's probably because of high immunogenicity of this.
We, humans, never seen these antigens, so response is so intense that people release lots of cytokines (cytokine "storm'), which then cause what you described.
They first said snakes were the origin, but now someone is saying that it looks more like it came from a bat.



1387. Post 53703261 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: lightfoot on January 26, 2020, 05:44:57 AM

is it too cynical to short some stocks?

We're putting everything in canned food and shotguns.

If this things R0 is near 4 as some fear, and it kills at a rate of 14% this could be a very big deal.
Hardly. it will probably kill old people which will finally get rid of the whole Boomer problem. :-)

Stay healthy, stay up to date on immunizations and the like and rock on. Or ignore science, pray to an ignorant god, and go from there.

What immunizations? It's not a flu.



1388. Post 53703329 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: lightfoot on January 26, 2020, 06:04:02 AM
What immunizations? It's not a flu.
You don't want to have your body already weakened by other crap when this comes in. IE: Be as healthy as possible.

Not quite time to man the 50 caliber machine gun yet. This should be interesting to watch. Besides our government is staffed by competent scientific

minds

that

oh fuck we're doomed. Ah well.

A reporter today (or yesterday) was interviewing some biotech exec.
Exec: "We got the sequence on Jan 9, so we can now start working toward a vaccine".
Reporter: So, when it would be ready, then (implying that he, like, downloaded a pdf file and expecting a "curing" app any minute, lol)?
Exec: it usually takes 10 years, but with some "acceleration" with the help of the government, it could be done in 4 years.
Reporter: just sitting there in silence, basically. It was 'amusing' to see.



1389. Post 53703475 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: lightfoot on January 26, 2020, 06:27:15 AM
A reporter today (or yesterday) was interviewing some biotech exec.
Exec: "We got the sequence on Jan 9, so we can now start working toward a vaccine".
Reporter: So, when it would be ready, then (implying that he, like, downloaded a pdf file and expecting a "curing" app any minute, lol)?
Exec: it usually takes 10 years, but with some "acceleration" with the help of the government, it could be done in 4 years.
Reporter: just sitting there in silence, basically. It was 'amusing' to see.

Based on H5N1 (which is really bad) it should take about 6 months tops.

With human trials on healthy volunteers, then testing vaccine's ability to protect?
Impossibru.



1390. Post 53710044 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: Basorexia on January 26, 2020, 08:32:58 PM


... when the shops run out of masks
This is relevant in connection with the latest news ...  Cheesy Lips sealed
It’s both sad and funny.


sad/funny, yes, but only cup was needed...'being a jerk'.



1391. Post 53710096 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Quote from: Searing on January 26, 2020, 09:21:59 PM


Sure, that was 2013 and without the - justHodl, SoV is only left over from the original idea and Satoshi White Paper.


Now btc IS just more Ponzi than ever, thx to kicking out all the business (remember the 2x UASF shit show?)


Im happy BSV - Bitcoin is back on track

Make a BSV-wall Observer thread and please get lost in there ..... we can perfectly be functional whiteout you in here

Be gone be silent, leave BTC out of your writing and focus creating a thread for “your kind of people”

I just moved a legacy address bitcoin core to another address. I think Monday I'm gonna flush all the forks off of that paper wallet of BSV/BCH or whatever. At the 'now-price'

that is equivalent to 7.055 BTC-Core. This is after 15% cap gains and 10% state tax in the USA. Should have done this much sooner...but I think it is now or never time. I'm so

invested in BTC-Core that if this is a 'mistake' it won't matter much compared to a BTC-Core implosion. So going for it. But nice score regardless in that these BTC

only exist I will get from 'dubious' forks of BTC-Core. So taking the 'sensible' approach now. (If I believe in a pump in 2020 due to having).

Strategy = "Run Away, Run Away" Smiley

Brad


right here and now, i would just cash it out and 'diworsify', maybe even into T-bills.
Not sure if buying btc here is the right move short term. Long term-of course, yes.



1392. Post 53719284 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Long term, I am not sure that having an association between disasters and btc price is a good thing.
On the other hand, rightly or wrongly, WO always prognosticates high btc prices if and when fiat system collapses.
Mixed feelings on this one. Having lots of money when put in the casket is not my idea of fun.



1393. Post 53727952 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.13h):

Why, exactly, are we surging?
Didn't Apple earnings cancel coV? /s

I lost track of trends and counter-trends.



1394. Post 53742330 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: vapourminer on January 31, 2020, 01:34:21 AM

my bank has no issues with coinbase. yes i use coinbase, since 2013. never had any issues at all. the amounts ive moved have surely caught the banks attention as any individual transfers over 10,000 USD get flagged. and i dont try to hide them (called layering? i forget. theres a term when avoiding hitting the 10k limit, like 9700, 8500 etc). so i do 10k on the dot chunks.

I never paid any attention to this.
If i needed 8k, that's what i withdrew; when needed 2k, withdrew that.
When I wanted a bigger chunk (a bit above 10k), then I did it too.
I can recall once being asked about it (by the bank) and since that withdrawal was for either mortgage or car, that was, indeed, my answer, not surprisingly.

Now, if we hit a serious value for btc like 100-200K/btc, then, I am afraid, even those who have a single digit corn for cashing out would have some 'splaining to do. In fact, regular checking is not even equipped to handle large cash loads inasmuch as FDIC insurance in US only covers first $250K. Investment banks might be a better destination, but don't take this as an advice. I have no idea if this is true (never tried).



1395. Post 53742689 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: Paashaas on January 31, 2020, 04:56:39 AM
- Over 3000 new suspected cases of coronavirus in China; 9821 in total, 25,060 cases.

- Death toll grows from 132 to 213.

- Russia and North-Korea closing borders with China.

- First 2 cases confirmed in Italy, Germany confirms 5th case.

- 6,000 quarantined aboard Italian cruise ship.

- Virus arrives in the Philippines.

- Airliners suspending flights to/from mainland China.

- WHO declares global pandemic.

- China reported largest one-day jump in fatalities.

- South Korea and U.S confirms first human-to-human transmission.

Below prior predicted trend, but not by much.
Still....

Quote from: d_eddie on January 31, 2020, 05:08:42 AM
One of the reasons to check the WO at least once in a while - V8's findings... (This is one of the most bullish among recent posts IMO.) (Did I mention nice outfit BTW?)
+1


Didn't get that.
The article talks to me like I am a child.
Where is bitcoin there, exactly?
AFAIU, Strike has a LN node, you simply deposit cash from your bank account or debit card into Strike (as a prepay?), strike then "takes" your cash, 'virtually' exchanges it for btc in their "channels", use their channels to pay your LN invoice, debits your cash. They interact with btc, you don't (for payment). Is it a "good thing"? I dunno. Maybe I misunderstood their setup, but what exactly the following means?
Quote
Bank accounts and debit cards can now speak to nodes all over the world, and nodes all over the world can now speak to bank accounts and debit cards.



1396. Post 53747119 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: Paashaas on January 31, 2020, 04:42:36 PM

Nope, fucking scary actually.
But it seems not Trezors fault, the STM32 micro misbehaves when it is voltage "glitched".
Basically the device is useless as hardware wallet without replacement, except when the seed is protected by a BIP39 passphrase (which is what Kraken recommends as fix/cure).

^ Krakens blog article is really very detailed and well written. You need only a minimal electronic understanding to reproduce the attack. (<- Meaning the crims will be up to speed quickly).


Not a new exploit just old rehased FUD, use a passphrase (like we all do) and have to be able to defend from physical attacks.

Passphrase? Yet another password to lose/forget.
Seriously, though, if you already have corn on Trezor without a passphrase, then wouldn't adding passphrase simply create another wallet/account on the same Trezor?
If so, you would have to make an additional step of transferring corn from OLD (no passphrase) account to NEW (with passphrase) account.
Am I correct or not?



1397. Post 53748554 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

If it is man-made (HIV like sequences giving a possible hint) then I hope world would demand an answer and have consequences for the perps.

This is of note:

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.26.919985v1.full

Quote
2019-nCov was reported to share the same receptor, Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), with SARS-Cov.

Quote
In addition, the distribution of ACE2 is also more widespread in male donors than females: at least 5 different types of cells in male lung express this receptor, while only 2~4 types of cells in female lung express the receptor. This result is highly consistent with the epidemic investigation showing that most of the confirmed 2019-nCov infected patients were men (30 vs. 11, by Jan 2, 2020).

We also noticed that the only Asian donor (male) has a much higher ACE2-expressing cell ratio than white and African American donors (2.50% vs. 0.47% of all cells). This might explain the observation that the new Coronavirus pandemic and previous SARS-Cov pandemic are concentrated in the Asian area.

So, chances to avoid it (from the paper) are better (so far) for White/African American females, then White/AA males, then Asian females, then Asian males.



1398. Post 53748632 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: gentlemand on February 01, 2020, 12:43:36 AM
I cannae tell whether more people on this thread will die from disappointment if it's successfully contained and burns out or if the disease runs riot and finishes them off in unimaginable horror.

I'm guessing it'll be somewhere around the same.

I wonder how did you arrive at this conclusion?
I don't see anybody cheering for the disease.

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on February 01, 2020, 12:50:57 AM
Guys, enough dying for today. This is not a death-observer thread. Roll Eyes

btc declined too, but not much, GBTC lost a bit of the premium.
btc actually outperformed most other cryptos.
People were talking about bargains before. It does not feel like buying at the moment.





1399. Post 53754399 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 01, 2020, 11:54:48 PM


it's not so simple...

I think that it is a partial homage to Dali:

http://archive.thedali.org/mwebcgi/mweb.exe?request=record;id=3993;type=101

perhaps, rather, it is the mushroom cloud doing 'something' here.



1400. Post 53754501 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Was this posted before?

https://unchained-capital.com/blog/bitcoin-obsoletes-all-other-money/

If it was, my apologies.

I was amazed by the fact that in 2020 0.2btc is an average holding, but in 20230 it is projected to drop to 0.02btc (from a graph I surmise that it would be about 0.05 btc in 2025). From 2030 on it would decline very slowly (to 0.01btc in 2060ies). This tells me that rapid appreciation in btc would probably stop around the 'bend' in the curve at around the halving of 2024.



1401. Post 53760321 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on February 02, 2020, 08:11:03 PM
Will this support level hold? Or are we actually going to witness the continuation of "alt-season"?



Thanks for the graph, merited.
My interpretation is slightly different.
It's not the altseason, it's a repricing of POS (including upcoming POS (eth) and NRC, not real crypto (ripple)) vs POW crypto.
The difference: only POS/NRC coins really move, POW alts don't move much.
I think that it would continue for at least 2-2.5mo, after which we would probably have a fast move in btc (at least 10 points up in dominance from the lows at the end of March-beginning of April).



1402. Post 53760428 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on February 02, 2020, 08:45:39 PM
Thanks for the graph, merited.
My interpretation is slightly different.
It's not the altseason, it's a repricing of POS (including upcoming POS (eth) and NRC, not real crypto (ripple)) vs POW crypto.
The difference: only POS/NRC coins really move, POW alts don't move much.
I think that it would continue for at least 2-2.5mo, after which we probably would have a fast move in btc (at least 10 points up in dominance from the lows at the end of March-beginning of April).

TBH, that's not a common point-of-view. I've heard people shouting "PoW will pump, PoS won't!" before, but not the opposite of it. Let's see if what you're saying actually happens.

Two coins out of my whole portfolio that pumped a hell lot in January are ADA and ZEC. One is PoS and the other is PoW. I've completely bitcoin-ed out my ZEC, but not ADA. I honestly would love to see ADA/BTC running up further. Tongue Let's see, let's see...

I was partially referring just to today's sharp POS move. let's see if it continues or not.
personally, i like POW more as it feels real (converting electricity to coin's security).
In a long run it is possible that king btc will defeat all (going back to 80-90% dominance), we shall see.



1403. Post 53760566 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on February 02, 2020, 09:18:54 PM
Only if you say 'o2o2twentytwenty', which you don't, or zero 2 zero 2 twenty twenty which is for nerds and worse.
Sorry but today's date in human language whether yankee or limey is  2 2 20 20
or something
it still works in 'human language' for US if you write (as some websites ask you to do):
02022020

Signed: nerd or worse (dork, geek, web bot?)



1404. Post 53760649 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on February 02, 2020, 09:30:42 PM
Do geese see God?
Top spot

Q: why GAATTC is a part of a palindrome?



1405. Post 53761588 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

some weirdness in price aka premature eruption.



1406. Post 53761664 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 03, 2020, 03:32:24 AM
Asia limit down

wow

China is down 8.2%, HSI (Hong Kong) is up a little, paradoxically.



1407. Post 53761731 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Hey, what about bitcoin? Commodities are declining rapidly, yet gold and bitcoin stay the course so far.
I think that if western markets would be largely stable tomorrow, so would be btc as well.
waiting for the stock market bounce to do anything.
BTW, despite all those gap ups in trillion $ companies (AAPL, AMZN), SP500 in US is negative for the year.



1408. Post 53774717 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

buy Tesla...derp.

Why WS bobbleheads always whine about btc, but when a stocks goes up 20% every day for what, 5-6 day now, then it is totally cool.
Stock market has become positively insane. Bitcoin is the oasis of sanity.



1409. Post 53774749 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

An official version:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2012-7

Quote
Furthermore, it was found that 2019-nCoV is 96% identical at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus.

I don't have time to read it carefully, maybe during the weekend.
From a first look at the abstract, unless there are clear areas where you can see the other 4% being of artificial/or other source origin, the idea that it is an artificial construct appears to have little support. In artificial construct, there would be larger areas of little sequence similarity, i would think.
Again, keep digging, maybe there would be a sudden revelation re other 4%.



1410. Post 53774986 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

"The way we work is killing us" aka "Dying for a paycheck".

https://getpocket.com/explore/item/the-way-we-work-is-killing-us

Quote
The Economist magazine ran this interesting chart in which they show productivity on one axis and work hours on the other. There’s this nice linear negative relationship—the more hours a country’s working, the lower the productivity.

These studies have been done at the industry level as well and show the same thing. So the idea that you’ve got to work all these crazy hours in order to be productive is just not true. It’s completely empirically incorrect. Same with layoffs. They don’t benefit companies. Job control and micromanaging doesn’t benefit companies. So we’ve created a lose-lose situation in which people are suffering and companies aren’t benefiting.

Quote
...why workers are so stressed out in the first place—management practices like long work hours, unpredictable schedules, toxic bosses, and after-hours emails.



1411. Post 53775078 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 05, 2020, 04:55:46 AM

Cite?

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/04/4/l_044_02.html

If I am not mistaken we share something like 90% with almost everything except mushrooms and mollusks

not quite, but we do share protein-coding regions with mice at 85% (only 50% for non-protein coding regions which are more prominent in the genome).
We, humans, do have an interesting group of genes that determine the brain size (microcephalin or MCPH1 is a prime example).
This gene, and in particularly, haplotype D, is associated with increased brain size as we moved from hominids to current humans, suggesting a selective sweep. Planet of the apes anyone?
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/613277/chinese-scientists-have-put-human-brain-genes-in-monkeysand-yes-they-may-be-smarter/

here you go again...



1412. Post 53793643 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Why can't we just enjoy the bull market, which can take many different paths.
As long as I am doubling my fiat equivalent each year, I am more than happy (delighted).
I hope that we don't have to surge, then collapse EVERY freaking time (so far thrice we went down more than 80% in the complete four year cycle).



1413. Post 53793901 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

By doubling I was simply referring to last year (2019) with a desire to see the trend continuing sans large spikes and drawdowns.



1414. Post 53805272 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on February 09, 2020, 08:06:56 PM
Don't get mad at Luc.

He doesn't say it is going go to $6k without any conditions.

He says it will happen if it stays under $11k which is a pretty valid guess imo. I'll buy more tomorrow to help to invalidate this TA. If you want the same thing, you should too.

This thing won't go to $100k by itself, somebody has to buy it from $10k and $20k... $60k... and all the way up to $100k. Believe it or not, Some will even buy it at $100k.

This time BTC is going to $350-$450k so LOTS of peeps are going to jump in at $100k and further up.  Cool

Bruh, I think 350-450k might be a bit ambitious for this cycle. That kind of price will come in 2025 or something a year after the 2024 halving.

Just my opinion but obviously would love you to be right.

Maybe, but I have penciled in $70K-357K range ($350 is at the border, obviously) based on prior stats.
The median of $70-357K is about $213K, which is my best case scenario for the moment.
S2F predicted 6K level for the last cycle, we went about 3-3.5 times that in 2017.
If $100K is the average for the next cycle, then 300-350K is a similar size spike (followed by a 'plunge' to about $50-60k at the local bottom).



1415. Post 53805318 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Opinion: Buffett would buy btc when it would be about 500bil (that's his trigger point, see AAPL), pushing it almost singlehandedly to 1.5tril.
CBs would do the rest.



1416. Post 53806367 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.14h):

Quote from: bones261 on February 09, 2020, 11:57:58 PM
What's the best defence against a nocoiner: burning oil, flaming arrows, a good ol' pitchfork?

(I know some nancy-boy will respond with knowledge and fine argument!)


I currently own just over 200k sats. I hope that qualifies me as not being a nocoiner. I prefer not to be impaled, burned or mutilated by wo people. Shocked

That's 30% below each earthlings's average (locoiner status).
shape up to at least 300K sats...or not.
 Grin

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on February 09, 2020, 11:47:42 PM
Gents I have some suggestions to help us get to 13k in an orderly fashion with few interuptions. Not too fast is the best way to move forward.



Once 13k reached, unleash TRC Trifecta of trains, rockets, and Carolina.

Trifecta should propel us to 14k and then we can dip a bit for the latecomers.


when Kathleen's bike?



1417. Post 53813820 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 11, 2020, 01:51:09 AM

Pretty much what we’ve discussed here ourselves, including the numbers there.

What do you think buddy, what’s your estimated top of this coming bull run?

I feel a little bit more bullish than that.
In mic's contest I voted for 25,000 by halving. This means ATH before halving, this is going to be a little bit stretchted seeing where are we stand right now.
However, we know how it happens: slowly at start, then all of a sudden.

This can be achieved if there's a daily gain of 1.1% on the BTC/USD price.

Not impossible, but if it happens, it will probably be as you say, slow --> sudden. Regardless, I think 2020 will be a good year for Bitcoin, with 2021 breaking 6 figures. The main thing is not to reach it, but to sustain it.

I'd say, keep HoDLing throughout '20-'21 at least.

This is fine.

Don't mean to be a party poop..... well maybe I do?

What if the BTC price shoots up to $85k-ish by the end of 2020... but then corrects back down to $25k for the duration of 2021 and maybe into 2022... then what are the HODLer "waiting to sell some BTC" peeps gonna do when king daddy does not perform up to expectations?  

Maybe they start to feel that they did not sell enough BTC on the way up to $85k-ish? or they did not sell any?
 and then they feel that they missed the opportunity, again?  

Maybe even having to wait a few more years for the next price splurger into 2023-25--?   who knows... patterns can be broken, no?  Perhaps?  Perhaps?

How about this strategy:

I assume that 80-100K btc next cycle medium is correct.
Why correct? Because at the same S2F as gold in the next cycle, I don't see why btc cannot have a 20-25% of gold's market cap (at the minimum).

If above is correct, then btc would fluctuate around that number (sometimes out-performing, sometimes under-performing).
Use whatever multiplier you think is likely to describe such under/out performance.
If such multiplier is 3X, then it is 240K-300K at the peak, 27-33K at the trough.
If multiplier is 2X, then 160K-200K at the peak, 40-50K at the trough.
No multiplier-just sell some at 80-100K when it gets there.
Divide your "selling stash" into three equal parts.
Sell one at 80-100, second at 160-200 (if it gets there), third at 240-300K (if it gets there).
Then, wait for either 27-33K or 40-50K trough and possibly re-buy there or simply enjoy it.
Average of all three would be approximately $180K (not bad!)





1418. Post 53821277 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 12, 2020, 03:37:10 AM
the fuck is HBAR ?

got some?..I lulz-bought a few at 3c, then it went to 1c, checked today-I am in plus, double lol.
i consider all these extra curricular activities a way to eventually pad the account in btc.
I believe woonomic who calls them oscillators
https://twitter.com/woonomic/status/1192316103508148224?lang=en

You buy oscillator (or don't buy, who cares) when it's waning, sell when it is waxing.



1419. Post 53821301 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: d_eddie on February 12, 2020, 03:45:52 AM
Its peaking too early dam it.    I had 11500 I think and its perhaps even within a channel to gain this.    So that means if true we either follow that channel which is overly aggressive as said or we break the channel which can reset possibly down to 8k and will it reset reconstruct and regain 11500 before and on the day of halvening.   The odds are against me being even close I guess, I got the price on the previous grand list also just not the day required  Cry
  Drawn with crayons by toddlers addled with mt.dew

I share your concern for a premature parabolic rise. I doubt it would be good.

Well, 38% drawdown from here is 6400, 30% down is approx $7200.
If we are in a bull (and most likely, we are), then it's unlikely to drop below these numbers.
Plus, s-coins are going crazy. Can it all evaporate? Possible, but unlikely.



1420. Post 53821516 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Maaan...many cough around here, all probably with regular cold (as winter got suddenly colder), but it's difficult not to be paranoid these days.
If 42days is correct, then you would almost never know the source.



1421. Post 53846169 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 15, 2020, 08:34:04 PM
the fuck is a WAXP?

Novo's puppy.

the funny thing is, it all depends on how much free cash you have.
Example: let's say you (or Novo, lol) bought $10 mil of a s--t token. the token went from $3 to 1c, so your stake is worth almost nothing.
No matter, you buy another $10mil worth at 1c (there are enough tokens to do that), s--t token goes to 8c, you sell at 7c and MADE 50mil in profit.
The above scenario is purely hypothetical, of course.



1422. Post 53846827 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on February 15, 2020, 10:16:25 PM
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.12.20022418v1.full.pdf
Quote
ACE2 Expression in Kidney and Testis May Cause Kidney and Testis Damage After 2019-nCoV Infection

control the population!

That's a right kick in the teeth

People don't realize one thing: Mother nature doesn't f-ck around.
All stories about lab escape are irrelevant from a historical perspective.
We, humans, exist as a species for only 180K years, give or take, a very "young" species.
There are lots of us and we differ very little (0.1% or so at the DNA level).
Read the story of bananas. Once there is a dominant homogeneous species, it almost always gets wiped out, like prior banana "version".
What i am getting at is this: as planet is warming up (it does not matter due to humans or not) and our population grows and becomes more urban, further "weird" epidemics are inevitable.
We already got HIV, Corona, zika (affecting brain development), brain eating amoeba in fresh water, antibiotic resistance, etc.
I am afraid that we, humans, would be culled, which would suck big time.
As I was thinking about this, I remembered the "Children of men". Maybe artists/authors have a pre-cognition of some sort.

This all is too sad to think about, let's celebrate life which we are still having.



1423. Post 53847051 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: Torque on February 16, 2020, 01:11:44 AM
If I sold BCH and BSV and the other forked

coins from this mess, that did not exist in 2015, I'd actually be ahead. Not sold such yet.


Well just my 2 cents, but if I were you that would be the first thing I would sell instead of BTC if I needed the cash.  Wink

All things considered and since the numbers were revealed...our Brad here would be at around $10mil if/when 100K...he'll be OK, lol.
$10mil gives you a 300K/year cash flow without even touching the principle. A nice pension, indeed.
Just don't use your coins to lend on some of these newcomer blockfies and celsiuses, me thinks.
Not your keys...



1424. Post 53847151 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Around $10K (fractal-projected) in June-July area would be really tough on miners.
Maybe, $12-14K would be more amenable.
$10K is the same as $5k now, which is money losing for the majority.



1425. Post 53847168 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 16, 2020, 02:39:27 AM
tough shit

they can tighten their belts and evolve, or mine at a loss for a while, which would actually be the wise choice

evolve? aren't you in a good mood tonight? lol



1426. Post 53847413 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Since some here are in philosophizing mode tonight...
a question...
At which point does regular job become rather meaningless?
When savings equal 50 yearly salaries? 100? 1000?
Personally, I think that the number is very individual and depends on whether you like you regular job or not.
However, I would think that at 500-1000X most would consider at least easing out of a regular job and, maybe, pursue some personal growth hobbies or activities (travel, yachting, art, collecting, etc).
I am still working for a living and will be for a duration, hopefully.



1427. Post 53847652 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 16, 2020, 05:05:45 AM
Since some here are in philosophizing mode tonight...
a question...
At which point does regular job become rather meaningless?
When savings equal 50 yearly salaries? 100? 1000?
Personally, I think that the number is very individual and depends on whether you like you regular job or not.
However, I would think that at 500-1000X most would consider at least easing out of a regular job and, maybe, pursue some personal growth hobbies or activities (travel, yachting, art, collecting, etc).
I am still working for a living and will be for a duration, hopefully.

When savings exceed your future life time earnings prior to retirement + retirement savings.  

Great notion, we can even simplify this equation by transferring current retirement savings to the left part of inequality.
SA-savings (btc plus plus non-retirement accounts)
RS-current retirement savings (IRA, 401K, Roth, etc)
LE-lifetime earnings remaining (projection)
ES-extra retirement savings produced by more work

retire when

SA+RS>>LE +ES

>> has to compensate for bitcoin volatility.
To be on the safer side, maybe factor in 5:1 or 3:1 excess of the left part over the right part.



1428. Post 53847708 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 16, 2020, 05:30:35 AM
Since some here are in philosophizing mode tonight...
a question...
At which point does regular job become rather meaningless?
When savings equal 50 yearly salaries? 100? 1000?
Personally, I think that the number is very individual and depends on whether you like you regular job or not.
However, I would think that at 500-1000X most would consider at least easing out of a regular job and, maybe, pursue some personal growth hobbies or activities (travel, yachting, art, collecting, etc).
I am still working for a living and will be for a duration, hopefully.

When savings exceed your future life time earnings prior to retirement + retirement savings.  

Great notion, we can even simplify this equation by transferring current retirement savings to the left part of inequality.
SA-savings (btc plus plus non-retirement accounts)
RS-current retirement savings (IRA, 401K, Roth, etc)
LE-lifetime earnings remaining (projection)
ES-extra retirement savings produced by more work

retire when

SA+RS>>LE +ES

>> has to compensate for bitcoin volatility.
To be on the safer side, maybe factor in 5:1 or 3:1 excess of the left part over the right part.

I think that the 4% withdrawal rate or the more conservative 3.33% rate proposed by Bitebits are much easier to calculate - and of course, as you get older (or you see that your years might be numbered) you can increase your withdrawal rate beyond 4% and begin to withdraw into your principle in order that you can clean yourself out (or at least come close to it) before you kick the bucket.

Maybe, but it is difficult to do, unless upon getting to that 30X you sell out of ALL btc into traditional vehicles (stocks, bonds, RE).
Otherwise, you have to still count on a possibility of a 60-80% draw-down in btc part (which is exactly what happened to @Searing).
I'm actually digging the inequality (it's already clearing up the numbers in my head, thanks, @HM).



1429. Post 53847807 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 16, 2020, 05:56:47 AM
I don’t really care about 4%.  The only question is whether through bitcoin I can have more money than I would have had working until retirement.  This is a self fulfilling prophecy - eventually I will get to that point as my time to 65 shrinks every year that passes.  The only question is when that tipping point occurs.  I will keep going until then.  

Australian superannuation scheme provides better benefits than US social security with apparently no involuntary contributions from employees, just employer contributions. Social security here in US is very limited, typically removes 6.4% from the paycheck and has some draconian offset rules (WEP and GPO).
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/australias-safety-net-for-retirees-is-generous-and-comprehensive-and-complicated-2019-09-06



1430. Post 53848179 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: mindrust on February 16, 2020, 07:07:05 AM
...If the latecomers play their cards right they'll have an opportunity to increase their btc stash by %200 - %500. All it takes is shorting the parabolic at the right time.

Well, this is definitely easier being said then done.
You would have to short with a large margin, which could be absolutely disastrous if turning against you.
I wouldn't even try this shtick.



1431. Post 53852770 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Only 8.1% predicted the price correctly on Feb 15.
Most were too optimistic.
I think that btc price is chaotic right now and was such since last June with obvious attempts to talk it down.
I think that PTB don't realize that any asset price growth is an overall positive as it gives the positive momentum to everything due to the economic interconnectedness.



1432. Post 53852818 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

A dubious project: mine some Grin with 1080Ti or 2080 cards (could be bought used cheaper).
Not going to make anything, most likely, but not lose anything either.
Some here dabbled in it. A boredom cure, though, just for fun since everything else (btc, eth, zec) mostly cannot be done at home anymore.
Recession-who knows? I hope, not. I hope so because next time they will throw everything including kitchen sink at it with uncertain consequences.

One interesting point, though.
Due to the unique design of bitcoin, it seems likely to me that it is exceedingly difficult to replace larger chunks of sold btc in time. At least, not during bull markets.
I had done some selling back in Q1 2017, have absolutely no regrets about it. Needed the money, used btc. Never even tried to "replace" the chunk.
That was the only "serious" sell that I did, but even smaller sells afterwards mostly cannot be replaced (in a bull market). So, every time I contemplate a sell, I do so knowing that I would probably never replace it and I am fine with this. Then, when I buy again, I consider it a new buy, not a replacement of the 'old' bitcoin.



1433. Post 53854612 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

My understanding is that all those who are not sick or not positive on that ship are going to be released soon.
This is apart from those who took a flight to US where they will be sitting another 2 wk in a second quarantine.



1434. Post 53854646 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 17, 2020, 05:52:03 AM
You ever drink Baileys from a shoe?

please, tell us about it.



1435. Post 53860379 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: serveria.com on February 17, 2020, 09:13:36 PM
Meh



Looks like ~25k in May  Cool

More like 15-16K if we are 100% following the graph, which we are not  Tongue



1436. Post 53874449 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.15h):

Quote from: Searing on February 20, 2020, 03:33:48 AM
Supposedly Binance is back up...amazing how they 'always' seem to have issues on a major pump in price over a few days or the reverse on a dump in price.

I can see the engine room on the mighty Binance Yacht now! Down in the bowels of the ship this is being bellowed:

'Shut her down boys and girls, its time we polish the brass in the engine room and coast for a bit..till we can fire up and drive through this price/pump/dump storm and tranquil seas"

rinse/wash/repeat



Happens everywhere.
Even Fidelity had some accounts inaccessible today-just when I wanted to make a rare trade (in fiat).



1437. Post 53891650 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

Most here don't get the emerging medium term big picture.

Sadly, it would probably go along the lines of masterluc- that "Vanga" could be right again, but not for any "fundamental" reasons.
I expect a sharp drawdown in many assets including both stock markets and btc, maybe even gold, somewhere between now and late March.

After that, a recovery would start, maybe even reaching back to 10K or thereabout at the halving.
Still, kept all btc (since I am not good at re-entering), increased treasury bills position (sold 67% of equities).



1438. Post 53892474 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

Quote from: becoin on February 22, 2020, 11:09:40 PM
I expect a sharp drawdown in many assets including both stock markets and btc, maybe even gold, somewhere between now and late March.

That can only happen if Fed sharply raises interest rates. That will never happen! Too much debt! Too late for conventional monetary policy!


Q: what does this have to do with the interest rates?
A: nothing

It would go down because there would be less E in P/E.
We shall see.



1439. Post 53892877 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

Quote from: jupiter9 on February 23, 2020, 01:46:40 AM
Anyone bullish because of halving? According to halvings in 2016 and 2012 we had one last correction 93 days before halving in 2012 (-57%) and 95 days before halving in 2016 (-40%). We are now in 2020. So this year 95 days before halving puts btc exactly on the start of this correction on the 13 february when bitcoin reached 10.497. We are now almost -8% from the top.

Is it possible that you are looking at a wrong chart? Halving in 2016 was on July 9 or 10th, don't recall exactly.
There was no 40% correction anywhere close to April 5, 2016, which is at the -95 day mark.
Are you referring to a correction between June 16 and June 23 2016?
First off, that correction was roughly 23%, give or take AND it happened after an approximately 77% surge in the prior three weeks or so.



1440. Post 53898740 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

An interesting piece...I always try not looking for patterns where there aren't any. It is very difficult NOT to do.
https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200217-the-simple-maths-error-that-can-lead-to-bankruptcy

Quote
Surprisingly, education and intelligence do not protect us against the bias. Indeed, one study by Chinese and American researchers found that people with higher IQs are actually more susceptible to the gambler’s fallacy than people who score less well on standardised tests. It could be that the more intelligent people overthink the patterns and believe that they are smart enough to predict what comes next.

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on February 23, 2020, 08:14:50 PM
When that happens homer, I think I will faint Smiley

in last night video prediction (next 4 years) went like this: 400K, 150K, no prediction, 100K

At 400K btc would be at 80% of current value of Gold. i seems realistic.
Additionally, 10K is equally distant in %% from both $250 (that was prevalent in 2015) and 400K.



1441. Post 53900162 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

Tomorrow's markets look bleak (this is the most likely explanation for a 250 [EDIT: $ or euros or whatever] point down in btc):
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/24/us-futures-coronavirus-outbreak.html

Quote
As of 9:45 p.m. ET Sunday, Dow Jones Industrial Average futures were 392 points lower, pointing to an implied opening plunge of 385.41 points for the index on Monday.



1442. Post 53913515 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on February 25, 2020, 09:57:12 PM
Nice graph by @flibbr showing the traded price of 1 btc aginst the cost to mine one over time




Looks like a partial BS to me.
First off, I remember 2015-miners did not have huge profitability back then (that is erroneously shown).
Second part of why it is BS-because there is no sharp changes in profitability at the halving point (mid 2016, for example).
Recent numbers look OK.



1443. Post 53920124 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.16h):

My take on this is that we are beyond TA and trends, running on pure emotions.
These types of markets are unpredictable, so my solution is to do nothing since every move is prone to be detrimental short term.
Selling out of most equities was a good move, though (short term).



1444. Post 53931681 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Gold is not behaving well at all today.
I guess that you are 'not allowed' to have any hedges apart from stupid bonds, which are overvalued.
10 year went up (down in yield) like 12% today, lol.
I am very surprised that we keep trickling down 2-3% in the stock market almost ever day. Very strange.
I would have assumed that markets can price in everything quicker.



1445. Post 53931932 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

amazing fakery, as usual.
500-600 points up in the last 15 min on the DOW and Nasdaq closes at, listen to this, +0.01%.
Got to be positive  Grin.



1446. Post 53932904 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

WO is a skeptical bunch with most popular prediction being less than 8K before 10K.



1447. Post 53938749 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

There are better one's today, but I am not buying.
If there was a FEDCOIN (that depends in price on the size of FED pumping), I would probably went long that one.



1448. Post 53938988 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

just for space exploration junkies...
https://spacenews.com/falcon-heavy-to-launch-nasa-psyche-asteroid-mission/

16 Psyche... 253 km in diameter, weight 2.4x10^16 tons (!), 90% metals, probably enough to eventually built a Dyson (RIP) sphere or maybe not...

https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/deep-space/a11098/dyson-sphere/

Psyche value:
$700 quintillion ( $7X10^20 OR $93 billion per each current Earth inhabitant).



1449. Post 53939239 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Bad economic numbers out of China (official numbers):

PMI 35.7 (down from 50 in january).
non-manufacturing 29.6 (down from 54 in January).
Only 43% of small companies reopened as of Feb 26.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/virus-hit-chinas-february-factory-activity-hits-record-014411209--finance.html

Bitmain actually fulfilled it's end of February obligations, surprisingly.



1450. Post 53939484 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: jojo69 on March 01, 2020, 05:17:28 AM
( $7X10^20 OR $93 billion per each current Earth inhabitant).

now   THAT"S    inflation

Someone should issue a 100-200 year "convertible Psyche bonds" with 3-4% coupon and an Attached right (guaranteed by all Earth goverments) to a part of uncovered wealth.
Say, $100k investment guarantees $10 trillion of "psyche future value" out of 700 quintillion projected.
So, 70mil such bonds at $100K/pop would raise $7 trillion right now, which should cover the development of necessary ships, technology, etc to do this.
Not sure who would pay the coupon, though, and numbers can be played with too.
The whole thing might jump-start the economy, though.
Sounds like a plan for after 2026 when the results come back.



1451. Post 53945995 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 01, 2020, 11:31:11 PM
I still think BTC could be around 10-12K before the halving... but those dreams about $100K any time soon (ie in 1-2 years) still look to me to me just like that: Dreams.

Hope they do realise some day though.

$100k might be not possible in 1-2 years, but touching $50,000 at least once by the end of 2021 still looks quite possible to me.

Pish. $50K is the post FOMO blowoff top crash nadir price.

Yes, our last low was approx 2.69x prior high (3122 vs 1160).
Last high was 19,780, hence 2.69x of it is 53K, give or take.
If our prior trend would hold, we would decline about 81% from the putative ATH high to 53K making 278K an assumed predicted high (on a spike), which also makes sense in comparison with the 100K median-state S2F prediction.
The last time median price predicted by S2F was approx 6.7K, we went 2.95x of this at the peak...therefore, 2.95x 100k median is 295K, which almost matches the 278k number derived by other means (295 vs 278).

TL;DR IMHO, any price between 200K-300K is possible at the next peak and 50K is too low.



1452. Post 53965558 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 04, 2020, 07:51:18 PM
Who?

A minor political figure of the "early bitcoin" era.



1453. Post 53966385 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: STT on March 04, 2020, 11:20:50 PM
not sure how to protect against the flu! does this count too?

I've heard several times the poverty level face masks, self or factory made make almost no difference.

Says who? Or, rather, does WHO say it?
If you don't have masks (or you have just 1.2% of what might be needed as we learned today) you would certainly say that they are not useful.
Anybody can see that all Chinese wear them ...and they seem to have new cases diminished (if you believe their numbers).
Independent variables or not?
I don't know.



1454. Post 53973090 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on March 05, 2020, 10:02:23 PM
Am I the only dweeb who is still mining in some fashion or another to gain more coins? I keep trying to day trade this shitcoins against tether and then against Bitcoin to get the most Bitcoin, it's endless.

Never mined myself but whatever works, man. If it’s helping your BTC stash grow then keep going.

Good luck  Cool

mining is like slowly buying, but fixed costs are high (miners are expensive).
At best, breakeven nowadays all things considered.

BTW, I think that btc is currently faking it (the bull run). Hoping for not lower than 8200.
How do I know? We got three super good news affecting more than a billion people, potentially, and all we got was a lousy 200 points or so.



1455. Post 53977942 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: jojo69 on March 06, 2020, 02:52:37 PM
I think I might just sell some gold today.

Maybe not a bad idea...albeit I already sold my GLD (don't have physical).
If everything would go down, gold would follow.
Not making any moves in the stock market and simply hodling here as well; S. Leisman is agitating for a $1 tril stimulation package.
I wonder if we would keep tip-toeing down at a 2-3% clip or would have one truly horrible day where we test circuit breakers, followed by a super rally.

Re Citadels-don't be too cocky in thinking that it would be btc in use there. It might be, albeit, no guarantees.



1456. Post 53978001 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: mindrust on March 06, 2020, 06:04:25 PM
Tesla and all other electric cars are trojan horses and we are actually paying money to get them.

Now think about it... it is crazy.

They should give us them for free for what they are taking from us. Tbh I still wouldn't drive one if it was free.

I seriously considered Tesla, got a beemer instead. Model S is fine, but overpriced by at least 50%. Model 3 is too small of a car (spacewise and for the money).
Beemer is a pleasure to drive-when you ask for power-it gives it to you right there without complains.



1457. Post 53978088 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: vapourminer on March 06, 2020, 06:59:44 PM
Would you please stop saying Boomers built the internet?
then the web was born before my eyes. that was when you coded your web page in notepad or vi.

Copy con TED.bat
@echo off
Echo Ted was my choice for Dos text editing
<f6>

i remember edlin in dos. ug. must of repressed that memory.

ha ha..brings back some fun memories
Try to write a scientific paper using xywrite...oh, my.

Nobody wants to listen to boomers anymore, but it is an interesting generation that lived through major tech upheavals.
They started (and lived into their mid-late twenties) when people were still WRITING letters (and sending them by snail mail) to each other for once.
Yet, here they are, facebooking, tweeting, etc. They adopted.
What would millenials have to adopt to in 30 years? It's an interesting question.



1458. Post 53978211 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Oil is down about 10% today, TNX at 0.72%, TYX at 1.27%, yet freaking mortgages are STILL at 3.25-3.5%.
They have to be at 2.25-2.5% MAX.



1459. Post 53978495 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.17h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 06, 2020, 08:37:05 PM

Sorry but like i said before if you can decode this you'll be richie rich.

I am richie rich. <joeyvoice> howYouDoin'? </joeyvoice>

In your face...I like it...
That said, being rich is a temporary state. There is no rich or poor when our atoms join the landscape.
Would be nice to buy some time, wouldn't it?
That's, perhaps, is (or would be) an ultimate goal of the rich-extend their being.



1460. Post 53991007 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

Quote from: somac. on March 08, 2020, 10:24:38 PM
Looks like Luc was right about heading down to test 200wma  Undecided

Yeah, I think we have a head and shoulders on the chart. Target is 6500 again Sad

All those targets make no sense now.
The only question is: is this a one-off event which would dissipate in a couple of months OR is this is a reset of all economic activity that would resettle at a semi-permanent plateau that would last for at least several years. I still think that it is the former, but some here argue that it is the latter.
We shall see.



1461. Post 53991182 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 08, 2020, 11:06:20 PM



Hey!!!!!!


Where da lil doggie go?

 Angry Angry Angry

teleported himself out of trouble.



1462. Post 53991290 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

Quote from: somac. on March 08, 2020, 11:05:27 PM

semi-permanent plateau that would last for at least several years.

Not a chance. The central banks can not let a deflationary period happen. If the private banks can't keep credit creation going it is the end of our modern (crony) monetary system. There will be large amounts of printing, large amounts of stimulus, and all the other nice stuff we have experienced over the last 11 years.

We may experience a dip for a while, but it won't last.

Market bears think otherwise (note the timing BEFORE the correction), but it's just an opinion.
That dude is thinking that we will eventually (within a decade, I assume) will revisit SP500 667.
That would be gruesome.

So far, his thesis (laid down 20 years ago re negative bond yields) looks prescient.
https://www.barrons.com/articles/s-p-500-could-test-2009-low-says-longtime-bear-1522957392
and (more recent)
https://www.barrons.com/articles/perma-bear-albert-edwards-sees-market-ice-age-looming-what-hes-worried-about-now-51581452731

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 08, 2020, 11:47:16 PM
Gold, USD, CHF, BTC, digital fiat are all going to be in play. It's going to get crazy.

Man, I was so down to spending the next few years just working and, hopefully, getting wealthier via btc investment.
Freaking fourth turning, right?



1463. Post 53991355 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

Don't count on any previously reliable benchmarks if we hit circuit breakers tomorrow.
SP500 is at -4.9% according to the futures. Hopefully, it would recover by am.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/rout-u-stock-futures-trigger-221631295.html



1464. Post 53992050 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

Quote from: Paashaas on March 09, 2020, 04:44:12 AM
Covid-19 is affecting 109 countries and territories with 110.077 cases worldwide and 3.830 deaths.

This is just the beginning. Europe and the U.S are fcked. Global economy is also fcked.

Enjoy the shitshow, buy more corn and stay save!



No. Judging by the level of panic, markets would put a midterm bottom either tomorrow or by the end of the week.
^TYX will also put in a generational low in yield, could be tomorrow (since it looks like being below 1%) or sometime next week as well.
Someone would probably short Treasuries en mass soon. Gold says so.
We had a 38 year bull market in bonds, now (after next week) probably a bear market for the next 10-15 years until stocks trade at P/E of 7 and bond yield is at least 10-12%.

Then the bull cycle (at least in bonds) would begin anew.



1465. Post 53992128 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on March 09, 2020, 05:14:16 AM
$7839

How much fucking lower are we going?

 Angry

focus on a bigger picture, IMHO.
BTC price by itself today is less relevant vs later this week and by the EOY.



1466. Post 53992237 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

Quote from: mindrust on March 09, 2020, 05:34:14 AM

The man is a fooking LEGEND...


not yet, or at least not on this call.



1467. Post 53998024 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

A small comment to TA people who make a big deal (BD) out of violations of various imaginary lines: don't do it.

Extreme circumstances such as market crashes, virus, etc don't follow imaginary lines aka short term violation of such lines is NBD.
Look what MSFT did during the 1987 crash and what followed in the next 10-13 years.



1468. Post 54004839 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

Quote from: d_eddie on March 10, 2020, 11:50:33 PM
Masterluc bulletin

Quote from: Masterluc on telegram
Eh, what happened to you, America? All American bonds go to hell. No one else believes in old America








Doesn't have a clue about bonds, perhaps.
Low yield=high price. Bad for pensioners, good for those long bonds, just look at TLT.
EU has mostly negative yield.



1469. Post 54011517 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.18h):

Quote from: infofront on March 11, 2020, 06:50:53 PM
I'm thinking of playing the US stocks a little more. There is some predictable price action ahead.

For example: By the end of the week, some kind of stimulus package will be passed by the government. Markets skyrocket. Next week, following logarithmic viral spread and increased testing, the market will crash further.

maybe, but I am curious about rebounding yield curves. 10 year went from 0.31% on Monday to 0.82% today- a crazy move.
We shall see if it continues. I stand by my prediction (made on Sunday) that Monday would mark the generational low in US [long term] bond yields.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53992050#msg53992050

Quote from: BobLawblaw on March 12, 2020, 03:03:43 AM
Shit's gonna be apocalyptic tomorrow when the markets open.

Brace for maximum pain.

HODL strong. It's going to get worse.

Maybe, but futures are NOT at the lock down yet.



1470. Post 54018268 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: Icygreen on March 13, 2020, 01:57:40 AM
Unless she was in Wuhan you SO didn’t catch it in November
Wuhan travels, especially to S.Vietnam.  Chinese are the largest tourist sector (were).
I have fair reason to believe the virus has been around longer than the announcement dates in December/ January.

I agree. Anecdotally, a few people in late December talked about a strange flu that starts as usual, but then result in exhaustion/feeling flat 1-2 weeks later.
It could have been regular flu, who really knows for sure.

Regarding the current plunge, it could only mean three things:
1. Something is broken/bad news coming
2. PTB is creating a large discount for the run of the millennium (they are doing the same for the stock market, ostensibly).
3. Perhaps, new players are being favored and this is creating a "cleaner slate" for them (remember Armstrong putting out some verbiage about btc leadership being in jeopardy?)

I give chances to three scenarios (1-3) as 35%, 55% and 10%, give or take.



1471. Post 54018295 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: bkbirge on March 13, 2020, 02:02:51 AM
So I guess we answered the question of when the S2F model would be broken.

how does one day relate to a model that describes average price?



1472. Post 54018350 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 13, 2020, 02:27:18 AM
When's Jack Dorsey stepping up to the plate?

maybe he is the one who is selling out? /s



1473. Post 54018387 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: Searing on March 13, 2020, 02:30:57 AM

I further expect the stock market will dump another 10% on Friday, just my guess, IMHO.

Brad


If market will go down 10% on Friday, then it would either go up 20-25% on Monday (LOL) OR there will be no stock market whatsoever (closed for a month).
EDIT: coinbase says 5.07K-----> 5.3K. Really?



1474. Post 54018423 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 13, 2020, 02:39:41 AM
Well I still haven’t bought anything and nothing has been liquidated so while today has been very interesting not much has happened in real terms.

Yeah, I did NOTHING, was at work most of the day, too much in a stupor/flabbergasted to chase the elusive bottom.



1475. Post 54018430 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: mindrust on March 13, 2020, 02:40:39 AM
5229

put a gun in my mouth

why the fuck I even woke up in the middle of the night

going back to sleep, I'll probably delete my account tomorrow.

don't rush, it almost ALWAYS double-dips. Just be ready for it.



1476. Post 54018514 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: lightfoot on March 13, 2020, 02:57:50 AM
Well, another day comes to a close. And what tomorrow may bring I have no fucking clue. Might go to 20,000... Might go to 20. Might go from 20k to 20 in the time it takes to eat a bowl of wheaties.

Whatever. This is a fun ride and it's interesting to see this happen with a bunch of people like this forum.

Bitcoin as a Schrodinger's cat.
You never know if it is "dead" or "alive" before you open the darned browser after 10 min has passed.



1477. Post 54018632 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on March 13, 2020, 03:23:05 AM
Governments all over the world is pumping money in to the economy and health care and easing up on tax payments and doing a shitload of other things that will make the economy float right back up, like a cork under water.

Covid will go away, recession will go away, but bitcoin will stay.

Long term bonds would melt down, though (increase in yield).



1478. Post 54018693 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

just gyrated 400 points down in less than a minute.
I am about to switch off from this crazy spectacle.



1479. Post 54023045 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Note that despite FED employing up to 1.5 tril, bonds yields are creeping UP (and price declines).
10 year already more than tripled in yield from 0.31 to 0.96%, 30 year from below 1% to 1.577%
The 38 year bull market in bonds is most likely OVER. Think about it.



1480. Post 54023197 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 13, 2020, 08:35:53 AM
To keep things very simple, we had:

-December 2017: all time high 19.5k
-January 2019: low @ circa 3k
-June 2019: lower high @ 13.7k
-December 2019: higher low @ 6.4k
-February 2020: lower high @ 10.5k (very crucial price, the bulls will buy massively if we break above)
-March 2020: lower low 4k compared to December 2019, but higher low compared to January 2019

What is worrying in this thread is the constant higher lows (19.5k - 13.7k - 10.5k), this also means we should see at least another bounce (which would be a lower high again) at some stage, around 6.4k at least.

If I could invest big money (sadly my money is stuck at Epayments right now) I would buy a lot of Bitcoin to sell at 6.4k eventually (conservative approach).

What I also think is possible is to see a lower low compared to January 2019 which would mean 1k to 2.5k area (scary but possible). But if you are mentally strong it doesn't matter, we should see 6.4k again.

probably part of the reason that you do not have money to invest on your ideas is because they are dumb.

Furthermore, you seem to be selectively treating bitcoin as if it were some kind of abstract asset, and it is not.. we have convincing price prediction models that are likely to blow your dumb theories to shame... so good luck with that.. and I hope that you, at least, have stocked away enough money to pay LFC. which you are likely going to need to do long before the deadline of your December 2021 bet ending date.

Exactly, he (and Peter Brandt) treat it like some abstract value that can fluctuate randomly when there are much better models describing it.



1481. Post 54023220 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: eddie13 on March 13, 2020, 06:15:49 PM
Trump plans to declare national emergency over coronavirus pandemic

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/13/trump-will-hold-a-press-conference-at-3-pm-et-to-discuss-coronavirus-response.html

It will be a turbulent journey, don't forget your TP rolls.

"The declaration would free up as much as $40 billion in financial resources to assist Americans affected by the outbreak."

How absolutely pathetic the gov and fed is.. They disgust me..

They can pump 500 billion - 1.5 trillion into the stock market, but we are supposed to be happy with 40 billion to help actual people?
What pieces of shit..

I'd rather they spent nothing and just let it all burn to the ground, right along with Bitcoin, because now we all know Bitcoin is just junk that will dump right along with the rest of the fake economy..

Did any crypto actually do its job? XMR? DASH? GRIN? DOGE?
Quick scan of CMC = NO.. All cryptos are equally junk..

Gold? Nope.. It's dumping too..

It's all fake..

Fiat fake $$$ is the winner..
The fakest of them all wins the game.. Even with massive printing happening, worthless paper is the best..

USD and toilet paper.. Both the strongest hedges against crashes..
LMAO what has this world come to.. Asswipe (TP and USD) are the champions..

The game is not played in one day.



1482. Post 54023268 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: Cryptotourist on March 13, 2020, 06:27:00 PM
BTW Biodom, I remember roughly a year -or less- ago, you sketched your prediction of how BTC would do.
That included this massive dip.

Well done sir.

Did I? lol, thanks
I am making quite a few predictions, at least some has to stick  Tongue



1483. Post 54024195 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

One note: I think that BitMex should be at least limited in their margining (to no more than 10X).
It feels that they were instrumental in this debacle, no doubt.




1484. Post 54024243 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Another: planB feels that btc stayed within the S2F bands, however, one may surmise that bitcoin cycle became erratic.
There is no more clear bull and bear, or rather bull and bear appear randomly and not really connected to the underlying halving cycles.
We went down to levels first encountered in September 2017, which is almost exactly where Sp500 went to (in terms of levels vs time).

TL;DR We seem to correlate more with the stock market than with gold/silver OR with halving expectations, at least for now.



1485. Post 54024584 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on March 13, 2020, 11:41:11 PM
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/market-broken-why-nobody-trading-any-more

The US-Treasury market is freezing up, even with a $1.5 trillion liquidity gusher from the Fed. CONfidence and trust that the fiat game is founded upon is evaporating.

I don't see any Bitcoin markets freezing up. And they run 24/7. The TRUSTLESS bitcoin network chugs along settling trades trustlessly just fine in times of absolute pandemonium.

In the not too distant future bitcoin may be the ONE OF THE FEW ways to securely transfer/settle funds around the globe.

Let that sink in a little.
Parts of Europe literally banned short-selling, so yeah.

The day stocks move onto the Bitcoin blockchain is the day Bitcoin will have officially achieved its purpose.

Banning short-selling always achieve the opposite of what is intended: it decreases liquidity and forms air-gaps under low-bid instruments, like small stocks or exotic ETFs.



1486. Post 54024799 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: Elwar on March 14, 2020, 01:52:17 AM
Consider the halving.

Some people always throw out the idea that if the miners start getting paid half of their reward then mining will end. Well, the scenario they pose is that enough miners stop mining that the few remaining miners cannot mine a block for weeks.

The miners are now getting half of the value they were just last week.

...and?

hash rate shows about 6% decline in 7-day average.



1487. Post 54024818 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: smartcomet on March 14, 2020, 01:54:32 AM
Holding is so f**k hard.

don't want to scared WOers, just an alert.

https://twitter.com/Austen/status/1238614012205494277
Quote
Today’s economic crisis vs 2008.

Much faster, nowhere near as severe yet.



Before today's 10% rise (aka yesterday) I was thinking that we would decline 50% (SP500 at 1696) in the first wave (a month or so), then claw back 61.8 % of that decline in 3-4 mo (to 2743). After that, hopefully, flat. Now, I am not so sure what would happen. Decided to not do any moves for now.
Curiously, TSLA did not join the fray today. Perhaps, whichever whale or whales was/were long that stock he/they finally sold it and TSLA is "free" to go down.



1488. Post 54025084 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: lightfoot on March 14, 2020, 04:05:34 AM
Bidets are cute but take up serious space. How do you fit them in the bathroom?

R you kidding?
It could be installed on the existing toilet.

Luxe bidet neo 120 on Amazon-$50
order before they ran out, lol



1489. Post 54028124 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: ivomm on March 14, 2020, 11:45:41 AM
According to https://data.bitcoinity.org/markets/volume/30d?c=e&t=b
in the last 2 days nearly 1 mil bitcoins were traded (mainly sold) at the main exchanges excluding Binance. On Binance the volume was 400K each day, so we can safely assume more than 2 mil. bitcoins were traded. This is a huge amount and the question is how the market will adjust to this enormous inflow of bitcoins. I don't have a subscription to glassnode to see how many new bitcoins were deposited into the exchanges, normally it is between 15K and 40K, with a daily peak 444K in Dec 2018. After a month the chart will be accesible for non paid users, if anyone has a subscription can check and share what was the peak this time.

On one hand it seems logical to take more time to return above 10K and hold it. On the other hand, these bitcoins are now into a very strong and patient investors. These people are not like the new generation of theoretical traders who think it is easy to make profits. Emotions like greed and fear play a main role, and untrained will crack under the pressure. Experienced investors put their bids low and waited for a year in this case to get them filled. So hardly they will be chasing 10-20% or even 100% profits. Now, when the price starts to recover, the burnt traders and the whole world will see that even in utmost panic Bitcoin didn't go to 0 and no matter the fall it recovers really fast. This lesson will make the weak hands stronger, if they have the guts to enter the game again. So IMO not only a new bull run starts right now, but a whole new bull cycle lasting for years. May be this was the real end of the bear market. How far we will go is a question that honestly I can't answer. All charts and short term predictions were shattered. The good thing is that Bitcoin is not dead and doesn't care about these predictions.

Your thesis is that it was something similar (only worse) to January 2015.
I would hope so, but it remains to be seen (aftershocks, etc.).
It's an opportunity, but also a challenge.
If bitcoin comes out of it strong, so much for the better, but if it weakens vs newcomers, then future is uncertain.
Strangely enough, the dominance did not change much during the ordeal, which was surprising to me. I expected a strong increase.
The main competitor, though, had something terrible happened (in defi app, cough-Maker-cough), so that's that.



1490. Post 54028350 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: AlcoHoDL on March 14, 2020, 04:58:43 PM
According to https://data.bitcoinity.org/markets/volume/30d?c=e&t=b
in the last 2 days nearly 1 mil bitcoins were traded (mainly sold) at the main exchanges excluding Binance. On Binance the volume was 400K each day, so we can safely assume more than 2 mil. bitcoins were traded. This is a huge amount and the question is how the market will adjust to this enormous inflow of bitcoins. I don't have a subscription to glassnode to see how many new bitcoins were deposited into the exchanges, normally it is between 15K and 40K, with a daily peak 444K in Dec 2018. After a month the chart will be accesible for non paid users, if anyone has a subscription can check and share what was the peak this time.

On one hand it seems logical to take more time to return above 10K and hold it. On the other hand, these bitcoins are now into a very strong and patient investors. These people are not like the new generation of theoretical traders who think it is easy to make profits. Emotions like greed and fear play a main role, and untrained will crack under the pressure. Experienced investors put their bids low and waited for a year in this case to get them filled. So hardly they will be chasing 10-20% or even 100% profits. Now, when the price starts to recover, the burnt traders and the whole world will see that even in utmost panic Bitcoin didn't go to 0 and no matter the fall it recovers really fast. This lesson will make the weak hands stronger, if they have the guts to enter the game again. So IMO not only a new bull run starts right now, but a whole new bull cycle lasting for years. May be this was the real end of the bear market. How far we will go is a question that honestly I can't answer. All charts and short term predictions were shattered. The good thing is that Bitcoin is not dead and doesn't care about these predictions.

Your thesis is that it was something similar (only worse) to January 2015.
I would hope so, but it remains to be seen (aftershocks, etc.).
It's an opportunity, but also a challenge.
If bitcoin comes out of it strong, so much for the better, but if it weakens vs newcomers, then future is uncertain.
Strangely enough, the dominance did not change much during the ordeal, which was surprising to me. I expected a strong increase.
The main competitor, though, had something terrible happened (in defi app, cough-Maker-cough), so that's that.

I accidentally sent you a merit... It was meant for fillippone.

All the better for you!

here, have it back



1491. Post 54028777 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: Toxic2040 on March 14, 2020, 06:22:20 PM
Good Morning WO's

Its been awhile friends...and I offer no excuses nor regrets. Life has a funny way of always moving forward yet coming full circle if you follow my meaning..   Anyway...all is well with me and mine and I hope this day brings the same to your and yours.

After Black Thursday I felt the need to look at some older charts and to try and gauge which way the wind is blowing.

*looks around*

Yep...its blowing pretty hard out there..but this to shall pass. Hunker down, accumulate and take care of your friends and family. Its all I got really.


---------

Deep squeeze followed by rebound and accumulation at the 0.236 long fib
4h


Clear break across trend line into capitulation. The market losing over 75% of the gainz made since the lows of late 2018. Followed by...recovery?
D


..and the rockets red glare..
W

#stronghands




Thanks for the update, but some things cannot be explained or predicted by TA.
TA always reacts to events and has almost zero predictive ability.



1492. Post 54029824 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

came from walk ...and corn lost 4% in the next 10min. market is very fast.



1493. Post 54029930 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on March 14, 2020, 11:43:22 PM
NBA player who tested positive for covbull-19 has a message for his fans. He is feeling fine and playing video games.

https://twitter.com/NBA/status/1238886687444471810

By my calculations he has had Covbull for at least 5 full days, and he feels perfectly normal.

Probably a large chunk of the world has this or already had it and is feeling fine, just like the flu.


A year from now when they do massive tests for antibodies randomly in people to see who had it, they are gonna see how mild this thing really is.

Early estimates of swine flu mortality was as high as 7 percent. Ended up being .2

China already showing a .4 percent case mortality rate for cases outside of Wuhan.

"Similarly, a study released by China's Center for Disease Control last month found that if you factor out all the data from Hubei province, where Wuhan is located, the fatality rate in the rest of China drops to 0.4%."

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/03/03/809904660/why-the-death-rate-from-coronavirus-is-plunging-in-china?t=1584128903900

.4 would is too high bc it doesnt factor all the asymptomatic people china didnt test, so its looking like my Diamond Princess extrapolations are going to prove correct.

My guess at this point is this thing is .25 percent mortality rate. Just a bit stronger than swine flu, 2.5 times stronger than regular flu.

Enjoy the hype and the hoaxing though as socialist/communist idealogues impose social control and restrictions on people like shutting down eating places, shops, hotels, travel etc. This is as close to communism as they will get so they are gonna seize the moment as best they can. Hopefully people will see through this and push back.



Very well may be, but the effects might be not so much from the actual disease, but from the reaction to it.
All this 'social distancing' will not bode well for the economy, at least in a short term.




1494. Post 54030180 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.19h):

What is money when you can call it a strange word 'repo' or 'term operation', then produce 500bil of it (actually, 4X500bil=2 tril) ON DEMAND.
It makes for a silly impression when I look online at my paystub.
The meaning of 'money" is somehow lost.
I guess this is why I am in bitcoin.



1495. Post 54034923 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: dragonvslinux on March 15, 2020, 09:27:12 AM
@mindrust, I fully expect you to buy back at your capitulation price or better.
If you get the chance.

Nice to see you back.

I panic sold in 2017 (when $6K went back down to $5K, before going to $20K), because I had previously got in at $5K before it went down to $3K so wanted to get out "break-even" and not risk having my money drop 40% again.

At least now you will have stronger hands when you become a coiner again  Cool Better to have panic sold at $4.5K, with the likelihood of having the opportunity to get back in, then to have held on til some lower level and panic sold then. I think everyone should panic sell once, in order to learn from the mistake. Better now than later.

Not only that (and I had my fill of panic sells, especially in 2017 as well), but people also have to be accustomed to selling AND buying.
If you never sell, you would be more prone to dramatic sells of too much percentage of your portfolio.

I never sell more than 1% of my current position (in btc; in alts, much more) at once and I also never buy more than that anymore.

It is entirely possible that btc will go to $0.1-1 mil. However, it is also possible that it is a legend that won't happen in this particular universe.



1496. Post 54034957 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

An interesting twitter thread (on S2F guy page):

https://twitter.com/CaitlinLong_/status/1238915150368792576



1497. Post 54035257 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on March 15, 2020, 06:41:51 PM

What do we think about the potential price direction this week, guys?



first down, then up, then down  Undecided

more pertinent important questions:

will equity markets stay open: I hope that US and UK will, I doubt that they would stay open in EU

will banks stay open: they should, or SHTF

will credit cards work: I am reasonably confident that they would



1498. Post 54035549 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Out of curiosity: where in the world is Waldo (Trace Mayer)?
Pomp is around , planB as well, even Tone Vays, but Trace is missing in action (at least on twitter).
Interesting...maybe sold too many puts on his bitcoin? He was always professing that trade (through LedgerX), which I find inane.
I wonder how many blockfi loans got liquidated as well...



1499. Post 54035899 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: fillippone on March 15, 2020, 09:07:55 PM
Fed Cuts Main Interest Rate to Near Zero, to Boost Assets by $700 Billion

Quote
The Federal Reserve on Sunday cut its benchmark rate by a full percentage point to near zero and will boost its bond holdings by $700 billion to cushion the U.S. economy from the coronavirus outbreak.

The central bank also announced several other actions, including letting banks borrow from the discount window for as long as 90 days and reducing reserve requirement ratios to zero percent. The Fed, along with other major central banks, also lowered the rate on standing U.S. dollar liquidity swap arrangements by 25 basis points.

The Fed will keep interest rates near zero “until it is confident that the economy has weathered recent events and is on track to achieve its maximum employment and price stability goals,” the Federal Open Market Committee said in a statement. “This action will help support economic activity, strong labor market conditions, and inflation returning to the Committee’s symmetric 2% objective.”

More QE
More USD
1BTC=1BTC (bite me!)
BTCUSD bullish.


I was wondering why the screen light up in green few minutes ago.
Reducing reserve requirement to zero? Does it mean that bank can give unlimited loans when they have NO deposits?
That's a nice business to be in. Maybe I should re-fi my car loan or mortgage? They should give me 0%, right? /s



1500. Post 54036048 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on March 15, 2020, 10:08:48 PM
@APompilano
The Fed just announced historic actions of emergency rate cut to zero and $700 billion in quantitative easing.

Stock futures just opened 5 minutes ago and they are already falling.

The market is basically calling the Fed's bluff...
https://twitter.com/apompliano/status/1239311910870364161?s=21

It's too early to tell, perhaps.
Now that my short term bonds will yield zero (in US), where to invest fiat?
No need to increase my btc yet [EDIT: oh, oh, btc is following SP500 futures after a spike].
Maybe zero is still better than a negative number?
Somehow, I don't really like gold as it always seemed to be manipulated by one party or another.



1501. Post 54036084 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on March 15, 2020, 10:24:57 PM

Now that my short term bonds will yield zero (in US), where to invest fiat?


In toilet paper.

that's a 'short term' investment, lol (EDIT: depending on how much you buy, though]



1502. Post 54036314 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

I think money can be discussed here since it is potential future bitcoin  Roll Eyes.



1503. Post 54036568 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

It would be interesting to see a new poll re btc price EOD tomorrow (say 11:59:59 pm Monday, Central european or London time)

1. Less than 3100
2. Between 3100 and 5000.
3. Between 5000 and 7000
4. Above 7000



That said, I think that SP500 futures have got to reverse by the market open and stock rally has to ensue (at some point tomorrow) since it is close to the last chance for a while.
EDIT: if weekly are counted by the day close today in central european time, then we did close marginally below 200wk average, which probably does not mean a lot.



1504. Post 54040581 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on March 16, 2020, 02:46:44 PM
Most bet that Bitcoin will continue to fall, but the market always shows the opposite of what the masses think, in every crisis there is a very good opportunity that very few see, and in Bitcoin there is now a great investment opportunity.

Quote
A really cool fractal

I added some context to it, comparing the virus with the 2008 crash

Gann analysis on the price and time aspects shows high confluence for this scenario with near ATH levels around EOY/NY

Kudo's to
@CryptoCapo_
 and
@kenzboard
 who showed me the fractal



Twitter: https://twitter.com/BTC_JackSparrow/status/1239133425790930950

 And “Crypto Trader Digest” newsletter:

Quote
“As central bank printing presses switch into beast mode, Bitcoin should enjoy a nice run back through $10,000 towards $20,000 by year end. Each central bank will cut rates to zero and announce open ended quantitative easing.”

Source: https://www.newsbtc.com/2020/03/16/scarily-accurate-fractal-bitcoin-will-trade-20000-q1-2021/

Actually, I really like this analogy (fractal). The only question is where the pent-up demand would overcome the resistance of the current downtrend.
It very well may be that 3850 is the answer, but it could be also a band between 3100-3800. For fractal to work we should not dip below 3122 on a 'closing' basis.



1505. Post 54041095 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Am I too vain to say that it was a bit boring without football?
Maybe market low will be just before the mini-tournament (in lieu of CL).
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/51906630

That tournament should lift the spirits.
Not a Vegeta, but something better of a game.
Lads would probably be super-hyper and would fly on the field.



1506. Post 54041110 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 16, 2020, 05:55:13 PM

Yes, we have another damn day for Bitcoin  Roll Eyes I wonder how much time it takes for Bitcoin to become as stable as before  Roll Eyes I'm sitting here and watching my account go down every day, outside there is a raging virus  Roll Eyes Damn series  day with my wrong decisions  Roll Eyes
Now the lowest is 4400, how much next?

What would have been your wrong decisions?

You did not prepare financially and psychologically for BTC prices to go down, which would be having the ability to buy moar in the case that BTC prices were to go down, which they did?

Interestingly, since this am btc correlates the best with gold stocks, but not with gold price.
gold stocks are outperforming gold by a vast %, which is for the first time during this 'downturn'.
EDIT: Dow is down 10%, but btc is holding 5K nicely.



1507. Post 54041195 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Let me guess: last hour 1000-1500 points rally in the Dow-60% chance; decline to 13% loss and circuit breaker #2-40% chance.
Maybe both? Just seems unlikely to persist at this 9-10% loss.



1508. Post 54041284 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: BHSMC on March 16, 2020, 06:47:24 PM
Guys,

Excuse my ignorance on this matter but is there a website that I can deposit fiat via wire transfer and can purchase some tether from the U.S?

It seems like I can only do BTC to Tether but any way I can get fiat to USDT?

Thanks a lot.

any help guys? Sad

Kraken.
You can transfer even by ACH to Gemini and trade immediately, but I am not sure that they trade USDT.
Wire transfer would take time too.



1509. Post 54041617 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: lightfoot on March 16, 2020, 07:38:35 PM
Let me guess: last hour 1000-1500 points rally in the Dow-60% chance; decline to 13% loss and circuit breaker #2-40% chance.
Maybe both? Just seems unlikely to persist at this 9-10% loss.
They keep injecting money and the market keeps going down. Reminds me of the end of "Inside Out" when all the emotions are pushing the buttons and....

it's not working......



Well, we went down 13%, but did not circuit brake beacuse it was in the last 15min when circuit brakes are off (at least until -20%).
Listening to press conf-now some people make sense and talk a language of science instead of rah rah.
I liked that. Journos are crazy, though.



1510. Post 54042680 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: lightfoot on March 16, 2020, 10:21:26 PM
Yes, it *has* been that bad ever since the '08 financial crisis: A complete zombie economy hanging by a string.
Eh, we're merely back to 2018 levels. It needs to fall a LOT more to hit 2008 values.

2008(9) values? Only in a Depression, which this guy estimates only at 10-20% chance:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-16/guggenheim-s-minerd-sees-10-20-chance-of-global-depression

My current plan is to start buying stocks at 50% discount (SP500 at 1700, roughly, which is, incidentally, is also a 61.8% point of the entire move from 666 to 3392), fully expecting a possibility of a move to 1500-1600 area before the strong bounce. Not going to buy any current bounces. BTC-hold.
I am talking here only about an inititial move and a rebound. The whole structure might take decades to resolve (aka Japan 1989-2009).

Listen carefully to Novo here (trading advice):
https://youtu.be/_9-6tSO7w3A



1511. Post 54043011 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: nutildah on March 17, 2020, 03:52:44 AM
... And sea sponges injected 70% of their DNA into humans.

Explains a lot, really.

oh my, I actually used one today...now i have their DNA, lol



1512. Post 54046847 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Market economy?
Airlines spent 39 billions on buybacks, now looking for a handout of 50bil.
How about this: you did not have cash cushion (like AAPL, Berkshire, google, amazon, facebook), spent all your extra money on buybacks, then your equity goes bust, your stock is worth zero, bondholders get the planes, restructure. All money to help should be there to support the company, NOT the stock price.



1513. Post 54046941 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: jojo69 on March 17, 2020, 05:06:55 PM
I hear the choppers in the distance

...and 30 year treasury increased in yield almost 10% in ONE day.



1514. Post 54047106 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on March 17, 2020, 05:30:30 PM
WTB TP@xxx

Anyone?

All big supermarkets here are overrun by idiots, though the small grocery stores in the villages are stocked up to the ceiling. I could choose between 7 different kinds of finest ass-wiping-material a few hours ago.
That said, if you can afford the shipping I can send you literally shitloads of TP.

I have to smile heartly when I imagine the FOMO moving from TPR to BTC in the very very near future. Moon could possibly be closer than it ever was.

guess selling TP could be the new schema to get rich quick.  Cool

one guy's scheme to get rich by buying 17.7 thou bottles of disinfectant/sanitizer was busted by amazon, which simply closed his auctions/sells.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/he-has-17700-bottles-of-hand-sanitizer-and-nowhere-to-sell-them/ar-BB11blvS

...TP not affected  Grin

I have an idea: print new $$ double sided-one side money, another side -TP, separate before use of each (works like TP dividend)



1515. Post 54047241 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: psycodad on March 17, 2020, 05:47:16 PM
Wanna buy?? How many sheets you want?  Grin

In the very near future only coiners will be able to afford a few sheets of toilet paper every month (TP whales will be trading full rolls on black market).

Nocoiners will have to wipe their butts with dirty, thin, single-layered, rough and cheaply made USD.

trade busted...my better half had bidet installed couple of years ago..wet, but clean butt ensues (sans TP).

On the economic situation: since nobody working really knows if they would be 'let go', 'furloughed' or 'fired', I would advise raising at least 6mo worth of cash expenses if you can.
Maybe i am wrong; then, i would ease back into the market later on.



1516. Post 54047290 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: Searing on March 17, 2020, 05:49:42 PM
I'm actually impressed as hell, that after today and such that we are at $8,100.00 USD BTC as I type this.

You must either be a future traveler or a traveller of the past, Searing.  

Alternatively, you might need to refresh your page or reboot your computer.

Just for the record:  In the past three hours, BTC prices have largely bounced between $5,200 and $5,400....

There have been no significant or meaningful BTC price movements or spikes outside of that price range... so far.  Can ONLY wish.. maybe in a week or two, best case scenario, and a year or so, worser-case scenario (I won't mention the actual worst-case scenario, we already have enough depressing news in actual reality and also coming through the keyboards of certain doom and gloom bear-leaning BTC price prognosticators).

Trying to re-live my 'big balls' 2013 newbie past, when I dumped 1/4 of my take-home income on a KNC Jupiter BTC miner. Man the BTC/Crypto kool-aid was strong back then...

I'm probably gonna 'wimp' out but I'm trying! Damn, I was an 'impressive' newbie...I miss the stupid and dumb luck stuff I used to just do and be correct...and take it as a given...

ah..the BTC/Crypto 'cult' was strong in my heart then. Smiley



What do you mean by 'wimp' out?

I....verily...sometimes I have 'doubts' about my BTC/Crypto 'faith' ...Sad

We are all 'fiat' sinners! Sad  The lure of fast cars/McDonald's Menus/Rent...stuff that should have in the way back when of 2013 SHOULD have gone into BTC/Crytpo.

ie wimp out



Maybe we will not benefit from crypto ownership as much as we hoped/dreamed, but I believe that our children or grandchildren will.



1517. Post 54047468 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: eddie13 on March 17, 2020, 06:25:27 PM
Can anybody make a market comparo of some of the worlds top economy indexes VS the DOW to see how everyone is doing in comparison?


we are doing worse than China (FXI), better than UK (FTSE100) and Japan (Nikkei225).
url is too long to post.

BTW, look at bonds: 10 year yield is up 33 29% today (Thirty Three TWENTY NINE Percent), 30 year-up above 17 13%. That's a dislocation.
Novo was saying that we have a deflationary episode, but treasuries and gold say the opposite (at least for now).
Can large bond players survive this kind of daily swings?



1518. Post 54047806 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: eddie13 on March 17, 2020, 07:43:09 PM
Anyone else getting random unexpected CLIs on their CCs?
They trying to con me into spending more money or something?

My 2 biggest limit cards each got about 50% limit increases, just now, since last I checked them... For basically no reason..
2 different banks even..

It's like they are trying to get more money out there, and want me to do it for them..
When this covid shit first started I expected more of a credit crunch, limit decreases, but maybe with this fed rate dropping and money pumping, they will actually try to hand out more credit?

GF got a pretty big CLI too just the other day, from yet another bank..
3 banks.. Must be a coincidence?

I guess it means that they think that they can profit the most from you (via minimal payments) without yourself defaulting.



1519. Post 54048424 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on March 17, 2020, 10:12:35 PM
"My best guess, for what it is worth, based on the latest Center for Disease Control data, is that confirmed COVID-19 (this specific form of the common cold) cases will not exceed 0.1% of the US population. Moreover, I do not think, when we look back on 2020, that the causes of death or serious injury will have changed much from 2017, for example: (CDC statistic)."

Elon doesn't panic.  Cheesy

his stock does.



1520. Post 54048607 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/17/stock-futures-fall-slightly-after-market-rebounds-on-hopes-for-1-trillion-stimulus.html
Quote
Wall Street has been on an unprecedented roller-coaster ride amid the coronavirus turmoil, with the S&P 500 swinging 4% or more in either direction for seven consecutive sessions. This tops the previous record of six days from November 1929, according to LPL Financial.

Does it mean that we are in Nov 1929-type situation?
It's possible according to Raul Pal (see below). His definitions: 30-40% decline-regular recession, 40-60%-deep recession, 60-80%-Depression.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/real-vision-raoul-pal-on-coronavirus-worse-than-2008-204313745.html

Numbers (for theoretical SP500 decline):

40% 2035 (roughly at march 2016 levels)
60% 1357 (roughly in the vicinity of the double hump of 2000 and 2008)
80% 678  (almost exactly at 2009 lows)

Not sure what the probabilities are.



1521. Post 54048628 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on March 17, 2020, 10:45:25 PM
"My best guess, for what it is worth, based on the latest Center for Disease Control data, is that confirmed COVID-19 (this specific form of the common cold) cases will not exceed 0.1% of the US population. Moreover, I do not think, when we look back on 2020, that the causes of death or serious injury will have changed much from 2017, for example: (CDC statistic)."

Elon doesn't panic.  Cheesy

his stock does.


I havent owned any since 2014 when I went all in on Bitcoin, but TSLA has outperformed Bitcoin, Gold, Silver, Global Stocks, and the US dollar ytd(since Dec. 31 closing prices). Dec 31 also happens to be the day Covbull-19 became global news. Tsla is slightly up for the year.

So relatively speaking, criticizing his stock rn doesn't pass the smell test.   Wink

Not for long, and his bonds are at all time low (2025 quoted 77ish today).



1522. Post 54048921 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Does anybody have an idea as to why btc is trading on Coinbase pro and Kraken with almost $200 premium to Binance?

EDIT: Ignore, wrong data feed



1523. Post 54048993 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on March 18, 2020, 01:12:09 AM
Does anybody have an idea as to why btc is trading on Coinbase pro and Kraken with almost $200 premium to Binance?

I'm seeing a $20 difference.  Did you double-tap the zero key?

nevermind, it's just coinmarketcap has shitty data (i did not check the binance site directly).



1524. Post 54053529 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: d_eddie on March 18, 2020, 03:34:09 PM
OT: Yeah sure, let's bailout the airlines again... ugh  Roll Eyes

Where is the public outrage??  Angry

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-16/u-s-airlines-spent-96-of-free-cash-flow-on-buybacks-chart

I wonder if times such as these will eventually lead to stricter rules about public companies - such as after-the-fact voiding of manager bonuses, forced state repossession of nonconforming companies and similar draconian laws. Seeing what is being imposed on the general population in the name of the common good, which is quite close to enforcing police state rules, I'd say it wouldn't be too far fetched.

It's not going to play like in 2008.

Quote from: Gyrsur on March 18, 2020, 11:43:15 AM
the Pound is tanking.  Shocked

GBP/USD ATL from 2016 is broken.

maybe because UK money managers were discussing closing the markets.



1525. Post 54053661 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Still, 10year and 30 year notes/treasuries are going in the WRONG direction.
I talked about it before, and here is planB on twitter with graphs:

https://twitter.com/100trillionUSD

This inhibits potential re-fi activities.



1526. Post 54053874 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: Paashaas on March 18, 2020, 06:51:28 PM
Last month stock markets breaking records after records, the sky was the limit, endless bullish algo's.

4 weeks later: Lower rates, helicopter money, a multi-trillion $ rescue package.

Today the Dow Jones dropped under 20.000, S&P500 tanking 9% triggerd another circuit breaker.

Covid19 makes 2008 crisis like child's play. This is history. I fully understand why corn can reach those (ridiculous) $200k-300k predictions.


Eventually, maybe. I don't see it doing this in a deflationary environment.
BTW, now would be a good time to shine with a robust LN. Are we there yet?

Fiat Market (SP500/Dow) also cannot do a final washout, it seems.
Every time they try, dip buyers are stepping in.
We already had 7 (working on 8th) straight days of more than 5% intraday volatility-a record.
One day up, next day down-almost ad infinitum.



1527. Post 54053998 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Anybody has an explanation of btc flatlining?
It's weird, but i take it in lieu of declining.

BTW, I don't know about Bill Gates in particular, but I do think that me need a mixed government: technocrats and lawyers, not just lawyers (as the current setup).
Fauci showed everyone what a clear scientific thinking is and it was impressive to say the least.



1528. Post 54054635 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: lightfoot on March 18, 2020, 10:06:35 PM
Lots of economic havoc. Everything is down; it's like the opposite of the "everything bubble" which has been happening for the last several years. Stocks are down, which is expected, but GLD, Bitcoin, and even TLT (=long-term treasuries) are also down. Where is the money disappearing off to? Are institutional investors really selling everything and then putting the cash "under their mattresses"?

Yes, same thing that happened in 2008. Somewhere in this pile of knowledge we call a thread I talked about how in 2008 I was stunned that Gold had dropped below 600 an ounce WHILE everything was going bad. I could not believe it, but everyone wanted cash to buy MRE's and shit for the apocalypse.

Cash is dangerous because the US can print infinite amounts of it. That doesn't matter because people aren't thinking long term.

Once again I don't think there will be inflation because this "money" they are printing is just covering the hole of the "money" that was never there but was priced into every asset and transaction. It's replacing virtual virtual money with real virtual money.


fits the underlying case of living in a virtual reality...or not.



1529. Post 54054869 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: rolling on March 18, 2020, 11:34:28 PM
Anybody has an explanation of btc flatlining?
It's weird, but i take it in lieu of declining.

just a guess but it came in my mind today:

cash is king in these times and therefore a lot of speculation on the price of BTC is missing. what we see at the moment is maybe nearly the real value of BTC without the whole amount of speculation which is responsible for all the noise in other times. look how stable BTC can be without speculation. impressive!

No way this is even close to the real value of btc!

The price is stable because we have market makers involved in the system. They make their money by keeping the price stable. We had a massive dump the other day and then the market makers stepped in and are keeping the price stable at it's current level. If we have a massive pump, the market makers will stabilize the price at whatever it ends up at.

The price only moves up or down when the action is too much for the market makers to control.

That's a really strange explanation.
If market makers were buying (from sellers) on the way down, THEN they have to entice a pump (during which they can sell the inventory and stay neutral), otherwise they would be loaded with btc that they (market makers) don't need on a permanent basis.



1530. Post 54055163 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Pomp's friend Raul Pal is pushing an idea to escape into USD (https://twitter.com/RaoulGMI), but USD increased too much in the last few days.
It's got to reverse soon, maybe then btc would go back back to 7K and more.



1531. Post 54055202 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Is this "new normal" or complete lunacy?

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/615370/coronavirus-pandemic-social-distancing-18-months/



1532. Post 54059658 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Quote from: Lambie Slayer on March 19, 2020, 06:01:48 PM
BREAKING:

A peer-reviewed study shows that 100% of patients, after 6 days of taking a Malaria drug were "virologically" cured

This is, reportedly, the 2nd 100% cure to a virus that has ever existed"

This is the paper. Virus gone in 6 days. Holy Bull Run.  Smiley

https://drive.google.com/file/d/186Bel9RqfsmEx55FDum4xY_IlWSHnGbj/view


https://www.forbes.com/sites/lisettevoytko/2020/03/19/trump-says-fda-approved-anti-malaria-drug-chloroquine-to-test-as-coronavirus-treatment/#2412ffcc303d

Trump strong armed past the FDA's push back on approval and got FDA to fully approve this for treatment.

Its over boyz. Was a fun ride. Dont expect doom callers to apologize for scaring you out of your precious. Mindrust, I hope you buy back in. Its never a bad time to invest.




Very interesting. It's not just chloroquine, it is chloroquine PLUS azithromycin.
Both are already approved medications. Azithromycin is approved for bronchitis (and all Streptococcus infections), chloroquine-for arthritis and malaria.
HOWEVER, for what they are approved does not really matter. Doctors can prescribed approved medications for NEW cases at will as long as there is evidence to support it.
This is not targeted medicine, but it also does not matter as long as it works, slows down the virus to give you two-three critical weeks to develop your own antibodies.
EDIT: in addition, azithromycin is apparently effective by itself against some viruses, such as Zika and Ebola, so it is not surprising that effect is SYNERGISTIC.



1533. Post 54060187 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Everybody is too fast on uptake for both up and down.
I am fine holding, but having some cash does not hurt.
Those who say, buy 50% bitcoin, 50% stocks might be too early.
BTW, @LFC, FTSE 100 is at the 1998 level. 22 year returns are effectively ZERO, however, maybe a bargain now or soon.
Some predict the same for SP500-either going back to year 2000 levels (SP500 at 1400-1600) or, maybe no returns from here for the next 10-12 years.



1534. Post 54061216 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.20h):

Not sure what 'accident' would accomplish. Nobody is taxing until you spend it anyway (unless it is mined and not purchased).
Besides, with new rules (in US) on ID-ing specific transactions it's even easier.
You can use "specific tx" in lieu of FIFO or LIFO (in my understanding).

Another anecdote: several people were reporting that their credit card limits were raised (CLI).
Usually I pay in full, so recently one card (which I set up to use for a small periodic payment) decreased the limit by 25% saying that I don't use it to the full extent possible.
Just an anecdote that they are decreasing limits as well.



1535. Post 54066577 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

An explanation for the dip...reddit talks about nasty rumors (stock market closing) sometime next week.
My take on this-it is a crazy thing to do due to many factors.
Not sure how this would affect bitcoin trading since, technically, it is not a stock market.
Also, what about bonds-you simply cannot close that since it is a source of funding for governments.
On the other hand-how you can justify closing stocks but allowing bonds to trade?

Money market funds-today in US 3mo and 6mo treasury bills are negative (-0.02%, despite FED saying that they should be in 0-0.25% range).
I sincerely hope that they are not going to bust the buck, otherwise people would sell off their money market funds.

Raul Pal's "trade of the centiry" got busted, maybe temporarily (dollar declined 1.8%):
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-20/dollar-slides-as-california-lockdown-sparks-u-s-recession-fears

Comment: it was inevitable, it was up 10% in a few days-too much for many countries to handle.



1536. Post 54066684 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: toknormal on March 20, 2020, 08:56:09 PM

I'd say trading this market right now is lethal.

Anyone who didn't already make up their mind if they were in or out is just gonna lose more with every trade.

I agree, especially to the extent of establishing or cashing out a largish position.
Nibbling a few sats or a bit more here and there is fine.
That said, if someone bought at 4.0-4.5K and sold at 6.7-6.9K-that was a great trade, not sure if there will be more like these.

In the news: Adaptive Capital (Murad Mahmudov CIO) is closing.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-hedge-fund-goes-belly-up-after-bitcoin-price-drop-to-38k



1537. Post 54067171 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: lightfoot on March 20, 2020, 10:51:31 PM
We are doomed to skid marks and crusty cling-ons  folks...... just like my cats. (but they don't seem to mind...)

Screw that dude. On the basis of this thread I ordered one of those bidet things and will install it this weekend. We'll see how it works.

...it tickles  Cheesy



1538. Post 54067209 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

For those who want something heavier than the pre-weekend bunter...
Take it with a grain of salt, though. Suffice it to say, I probably disagree with at least the relevance of some factoids (like who bought how much real estate).
An interesting read, overall, though.

https://unherd.com/2020/03/covid-19-has-exposed-our-financial-fragility/

probably bullish for bitcoin, though...



1539. Post 54077644 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 22, 2020, 05:07:17 PM
Something I thought of last night: They don't need a test to see if you have the CV. They need a test to see if you have HAD the CV.


it seems to me that both kinds of tests already exist, even though there are a variety of techniques to accomplish and of course, shortages of tests and even logistical issues regarding who and how to test.

The "already had" CV test is testing for the presence of CV anti-bodies, I believe.

That's correct.
have CV-either immunological for surface protein (less sensitive, probably) or PCR-for viral genomes.
had CV-test for presence of antibodies. This test would become progressively more important as we move forward as we need to ID people who already had it and are possibly immune. These people could do things that others can't.

The only caveat is that the amount of antibodies in the bloodstream would be declining steadily after infection is over, maybe over a couple of months or a bit more.
After that you are still protected, usually, by the presence of so called memory cells (both T- and B-) which spring into action IMMEDIATELY after re-infection and not allow new viral growth.



1540. Post 54077785 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: nutildah on March 22, 2020, 04:13:02 PM
The fact is that Bitcoin has zero correlation with other asset classes.

Not a fact. Even @aantop recognizes the correlation:



There's other more mathematically sound ways of identifying increasing correlation but they are too cumbersome and boring to reproduce at the moment.


I would be ecstatic if all institutions drop off completely (well, maybe except a couple that were super-early) until bitcoin gets to $20-50K based on NEW users.
Then, institutions can re-join the game and panic at 300K all they want (as long as we don't drop below 50K).



1541. Post 54077922 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: Elwar on March 22, 2020, 06:16:17 PM
A temporary tattoo can identify the certifiably fine, and they can spend unemployment doing things that will help. Pay them from the Govt and you have a serious solution to this mess.

Tattoo with the person's SS number and maybe sew a symbol on peoples' clothes. Like a big star to show people that you're a shining star in the darkness.

Completely inappropriate comparison, IMHO.
Intent matters in this case as long as it positive (enabling) and not negative (restricting).
Personally, I would like to know if i had it or not.
If I had it, then behavior and options available should change, apart from having less stress.
Now, the word is going around that it originally started in September and a few people who had nasty "flu" in late 2019 might have had CV instead.



1542. Post 54078216 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: bitserve on March 22, 2020, 06:29:04 PM
A temporary tattoo can identify the certifiably fine, and they can spend unemployment doing things that will help. Pay them from the Govt and you have a serious solution to this mess.

Tattoo with the person's SS number and maybe sew a symbol on peoples' clothes. Like a big star to show people that you're a shining star in the darkness.

Completely inappropriate comparison, IMHO.
Intent matters in this case as long as it positive (enabling) and not negative (restricting).
Personally, I would like to know if i had it or not.
If I had it, then behavior and options available should change, apart from having less stress.
Now, the word is going around that it originally started in September and a few people who had nasty "flu" in late 2019 might have had CV instead.


See? So you are saying if you KNEW you are already inmune you would change your behaviour, relax your profilactic measures, and think yourself entitled to don't follow the restrictions, right?

Well, that's why it would be wrong to do that. Yet.

Not really...What i am saying that if someone knew their antibody status then they CAN take a bit more appropriate risk, like going to a grocery shop without much fear of being infected by a sneezing lady/guy nearby. Some can even volunteer for civic services. I am totally not saying that having antibodies would make you a superman partying day and night.

Having more information is almost always better. Regarding timing, I agree that maybe it is not the time, but only because the number of antibody-positive is probably low, although without testing we don't even know if it is a fact.



1543. Post 54079164 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Singalong in Dallas...

https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/03/21/819603870/inspired-by-italy-dallas-residents-sing-together-from-their-apartment-windows



1544. Post 54079186 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Marking the body-maybe not, or rather, heck no, but I would not mind concert-like bracelet that effectively says: "immune mofo" if/when I am.
You fellas never been to a concert or game where you have to wear a cheap bracelet attesting that you paid?

No need to give anything to non-immune, just to immune.
In fact, this might become a necessity if and when we have a vaccine in order to determine who should get it vs who don't need to.

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 22, 2020, 11:39:57 PM
Something I thought of last night: They don't need a test to see if you have the CV. They need a test to see if you have HAD the CV.


They already exist, several different versions also. Singapore has been using them since the early days too.

Goolge serology coronavirus test. or serological test

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/615379/antibody-test-how-widespread-coronavirus-covid-19-really-is/

A very agreeable article, thanks.



1545. Post 54094745 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on March 25, 2020, 08:01:47 AM
Lol the US 2000 billion economic injection  Roll Eyes

Watch it, EU would do the same (or more) a week or two later.

BTW, it would be very difficult to transmit all those funds.
Unemployment claims sites are overwhelmed in multiple states.
Yes, people would have the right to get about $1000/wk for 17wks or so (4 months), then back to $400/wk.
Would they be able to get their claim processed in time, though?



1546. Post 54095301 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Interesting opinion, although maybe not popular if applied here.

https://twitter.com/KeithMcCullough/status/1242540586042826760

Quote
What carries people out during crashes is getting longer on the bounces

Maybe btc is different. Overall market-who knows. Market declined in 2008 after stimulus, even chances this time (due to kitchen sink approach)



1547. Post 54095525 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Regarding "all in"-maybe it worked if someone did it in 2013-2016, certainly did not work (so far) if you did it in December of 2017.
I think that everyone should have 6mo (all family expenses) in readily available funds (that you don't need to sell under duress).
After that-lump sum or DCA-not much difference if you hold REALLY long time.

Right now stock market is going silly on the upside (in some cases justified). I don't buy just as I did not sell before. Too much noise.



1548. Post 54096080 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: bkbirge on March 25, 2020, 07:08:38 PM
I keep hearing that the stimulus package passed but am seeing conflicting reports.

Is the digital dollar included?

No. Last I read the Senate deal has been agreed to but not voted on. The House bill had the digital dollar in it but that was taken out and made into a separate bill. I don't think it was ever in the Senate bill.

of major differences-10K student loan forgiveness is out. I agree, that was peripheral (nothing directly to do with the current predicament), but would have made an impact on millenials/gen X-ers.
However, with congressmen being older than 60, it had no chance.



1549. Post 54097097 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on March 25, 2020, 09:36:50 PM


Morgan Stanley predict jobless claims to 3.4m tomorrow. That is not an axis.


They would say...it's priced in.

It is not, of course.



1550. Post 54097123 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

No point to enter the stock market until AMZN is also down 40-50% from the top.
I am 80-90% sure that there will be no exceptions longer term.



1551. Post 54097384 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 25, 2020, 09:51:17 PM
Of all the things I lost in life I miss my mind the most.

I'm on track, any word of advise, before I go full wacko?


Learn to accept the fact you cannot always trust yourself. That is a brutal thing to deal with if you have had rote memory your entire life and then its not dependable. Alot of people turn mean at this point and refuse to admit when they are wrong and I have certainly been guilty of that myself, especially when you forget that you forget.

If you start to get bad memory, and you realize that you are getting bad memory, wouldn't you have to change some of your procedures such as writing things down more?


If you have bad memory, there is always something new.




1552. Post 54102188 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: xhomerx10 on March 26, 2020, 07:10:04 PM
Well I may have lost my job here as well as access to my own computer.  My daughter took over my computer room, kicking me out until she was finished, and look what she made!  I'm impressed.

 

 avatar-sized

 


 I'm not a good teacher so this hat-making thing must be genetic.



Those kids!  Grin



1553. Post 54102325 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: Bitcoinaire on March 26, 2020, 08:21:06 PM
Quote
𝘉𝘪𝘵𝘤𝘰𝘪𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘴.  𝘐𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘯𝘦.

Quote
The price of bitcoin may set a new record in the next twelve months. It’s not going to happen overnight. My best guess is that it will take institutional investors 2–3 months to triage their current portfolio issues. Another 3–6 months to research new opportunities like distressed debt, special situations, crypto, etc. Then, as they begin making allocations, those markets will really begin to rise.

https://medium.com/@PanteraCapital/crypto-in-this-crisis-pantera-blockchain-letter-march-2020-4c73af3aaaf7
https://twitter.com/dan_pantera/status/1243256048317878272

super interesting



1554. Post 54102869 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

I am in a state of a maximum confusion re next 2-3 mo, clearly bullish afterwards.

Thinking of adding, but when? gold is slightly on the downside.




1555. Post 54108132 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

I "resemble" the fact that stimulus bill artificially creates winners and losers in economy.
It is kind of idiotic: it maintains 100% employment in airliners until September 30 when nobody is currently flying while millions are being furloughed/fired all over the country.
What gives?

...My SO was just furloughed at the moments notice in a healthcare/private company.
Now I would have to sell at least some alts. Foook.



1556. Post 54108646 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Baby-faced hedgie in hot water...

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/27/bill-ackman-says-his-cnbc-interview-was-bullish-denies-harming-market.html



1557. Post 54108787 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Coinbase $6666.66, I kid you not!



1558. Post 54109318 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

mein hertz brennt is more like it (current sitiation).



1559. Post 54109421 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Quote from: Elwar on March 28, 2020, 01:25:11 AM

He had a heart attack (not a COVID-19 symptom) on the way to the hospital.

This says otherwise..

https://www.newsweek.com/previous-heart-problems-covid19-1494730

However, I am not a doctor, so would mostly try to stay away from this discussion.



1560. Post 54109492 (copy this link) (by Biodom) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_17.21h):

Hey, here is a short story for you:

Ancient super-civilization is silently watches over Earth.
At some point, seeing that all that accumulation of debt had led to GFC, they decide to influence the creation of bitcoin-a sound money, hoping that earthlings would slowly but surely learn a better way to conduct finances (bitcoin).
Moving forward 11 years and ancients are witnessing a financial tornado (caused, apparently by a virus), printing vast amounts of money, making all kinds of promises of "support".
Nobody is essentially thinking about a "better way" which is becoming smaller than a mouse pimple.
Ancients: "Oh well, we tried".
Fin

Alternatively, this does look like a game or a simulation. What are the chances that several NEVER BEFORE seen events can happen within such a short period of time?
Lowest interest recorded in 5000 years, highest spike in unemployment EVER recorded, highest amount of money printed.
This does not look like a "game" to you?