All posts made by notme in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 1870392 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on April 18, 2013, 12:47:05 AM
doesn't anyone else see the similarities?

The important part is post-bubble. There's no reason to think that it will behave the same as in 2011.

There is no bad news this time to crush confidence. Actually, good news is still coming in just as it did on the way up. New merchants accepting every day. New exchanges and projects being worked on. Plenty of media coverage and people coming in.

no bad news?
what are you talking about?
btc24 is history along with +5M $
bitfloor stoped trading (AML reasons probably too)
it just hasn't made it to the news yet


 


What AML violation can you site any evidence for?  I would bet it's forced bankruptcy.



2. Post 1871851 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote from: GeoRW on April 18, 2013, 05:49:59 AM
Slush pool was under DDOS attack last 2 days and almost unable to mine. I wonder how likely it is for attackers to DDOS some major pools and meanwhile take over 50% of the bitcoin network computing power. Will be interesting to watch how bitcoin infrastructure will handle this. Bitcoin's popularity is getting some criminal minds to be very interested  Smiley

How do they profit?



3. Post 1872000 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote from: loanexpress on April 18, 2013, 06:31:30 AM
Slush pool was under DDOS attack last 2 days and almost unable to mine. I wonder how likely it is for attackers to DDOS some major pools and meanwhile take over 50% of the bitcoin network computing power. Will be interesting to watch how bitcoin infrastructure will handle this. Bitcoin's popularity is getting some criminal minds to be very interested  Smiley

How do they profit?

Following the money, isn't the only logical party to profit from a mining pool being DDOSed a rival mining pool?

I could believe that, but a mining pool wouldn't want to do a 50% attack.



4. Post 1930463 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Rampion on April 24, 2013, 08:51:02 AM
That's true. What scares me is what will happen when those who bought at $80ish to $100ish are going to cash out at $160 to $200. As I said earlier, the feeling is not any more "buy and hold" (which lead to parabolic growth), people is much more cautious now.

I don't get it.  Why would recovering so quickly from a massive downturn make people scared to hold?  Can they really not wait 2 weeks?  If so, they need to learn what bitcoins are and quit investing in things they don't understand.



5. Post 1962459 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Here guys:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=16223.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=27663.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=158638.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=165583.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=152274.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=126798.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=14438.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=165989.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167639.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=86894.0


That's just a selection from the first page of search results for millbit.

Now back to charts.



6. Post 1973453 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: thoughtfan on April 29, 2013, 07:35:23 AM
I don't see what are the fees  Embarrassed

Edit: And I don't know how to send bitcoins to my phone number  Undecided
There's not a lot of info on their website is - and I can't find any discussion on here about it either.  Have they just come out of the blue?  I sent an SMS to 'signup' about half an hour ago and am awaiting confirmation.  I think the main thing I'd like to know is whether the users' in-the-cloud wallets are accessible by the company or whether they're more like blockchain.info's only accessible by the user.  Not wanting to be a wet blanket but if the former then everybody signing up ought to familiarise themselves with the mybitcoin history!

I don't see how it could be the latter.  You are sending them an sms, they have no way to access a private key on your device.



7. Post 1973572 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: thoughtfan on April 29, 2013, 07:54:47 AM
I don't see what are the fees  Embarrassed

Edit: And I don't know how to send bitcoins to my phone number  Undecided
There's not a lot of info on their website is - and I can't find any discussion on here about it either.  Have they just come out of the blue?  I sent an SMS to 'signup' about half an hour ago and am awaiting confirmation.  I think the main thing I'd like to know is whether the users' in-the-cloud wallets are accessible by the company or whether they're more like blockchain.info's only accessible by the user.  Not wanting to be a wet blanket but if the former then everybody signing up ought to familiarise themselves with the mybitcoin history!

I don't see how it could be the latter.  You are sending them an sms, they have no way to access a private key on your device.

This is what I'm finding confusing.  Going by the limited information on the site alone it says: To make a transaction simply text your request. ex. "send '555-phon' 10 for beer".

Please bear in mind I may have got this totally wrong because I am not a techie.  But my understanding of that is that you're sending your payment SMS to the service provider not the recipient - in which case isn't it just an on-line wallet service with SMS instruction for payments and SMS notification of receipts?  If so then the private keys of the wallets associated with the phone numbers surely have to be kept on the service provider's side.  In which case, my question is: Are they only accessible via instruction from the phone or does the service provider also have access to them.  Unlike Blockchain.info wallets where the encryption/decryption can be done on the client side I can't see how that could be handled by an sms-only phone.

I'm not saying the service provider is untrustworthy but if my understanding is correct one essential aspect of Bitcoins - i.e. not needing a bank - is absent.  Maybe paywithbits.com is more trustworthy than Barclays or Mpesa?  I don't know but it's a big step away from what in Bitcoin world we're used to and I'm reservedly excited about this as something I'd like to see go viral in developing nations until I understand more.

The no bank aspect isn't what will win the masses.  As long as they are competent with security, I don't see a problem unless they aren't upfront about their real identities.  The need to be a registered business with the proper licenses.  Bitcoin is great for those of use who know how to secure it ourselves, but the average person is scared they will get hacked and lose it all.



8. Post 1980466 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on April 29, 2013, 10:35:56 PM
I just loaded some rocket fuel, we're about to blast off to the moon!

Paul Buchheit: "Bitcoin may be the TCP/IP of money."

Quote from: Wikipedia
Paul Buchheit is an American computer programmer and entrepreneur. He was the creator and lead developer of Gmail.
He developed the original prototype of Google AdSense as part of his work on Gmail.
He also suggested the company's now-famous motto "Don't be evil" in a 2000 meeting on company values.

The main problem I see is that Bitcoin is so dependant on the banking system. The exchanges fall apart without bank accounts, without wires, without ach deposits. Bitcoin works great as a "secondary" or "transaction" currency. Which means you use it when you want the privacy (buying bongs/dildos) or to avoid fees (sending to people in different countries). So you still use USD, you're paid in USD, you just use Bitcoin when the situation warrants it (and the advantages it brings).

When an exchange can be crippled because one american bank account gets closed, that sorta points to the fact this "de-centralized" currency really needs the "centralized" banks to operate. Bitcoin is doing well because Govts/Banks are letting it exist. Sure they can't destroy it, but they sure could make it a lot harder to use. Most sellers wouldn't want BTC if they couldn't convert it to their native currency. But Banks are greedy, they launder money for drug cartels, so I doubt they care about Bitcoin as long as they get a share (which they do, wires are expensive).

Yeah, we "Bears" have been preaching this all along, yet we were pointed at by the "true believers" and accused of "FUD".

I do most of my trades for cash.  I run a bot, but I only ever deposit and withdraw bitcoin.



9. Post 1983538 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: fitty on April 30, 2013, 08:29:06 AM
Things are moving...




Nothing gets by BearPig. This guy knows his stuff.

+1... ManBearPig is the wisest wizard



10. Post 1983567 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: ManBearPig on April 30, 2013, 08:35:04 AM
What part of "Wall Observer" am I CONSTANTLY misunderstanding? Smiley

Don't just observe the walls.  Be the walls.



11. Post 1983758 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: David M on April 30, 2013, 08:57:42 AM
Don't just observe the walls.  Be the walls.

Nicely said.  But I never fully understood the waiting.  Are we trading or swinging dicks?

Hit the offer or piss off. 

I'm not trading.  I'm adding liquidity and either selling a bit or rebuying sold bitcoins cheaper.  Bitpay needs bids to hit and so do you.  Lucky for you, I'm nice enough to provide asks too.



12. Post 1983854 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: David M on April 30, 2013, 09:18:00 AM
I'm not trading.  I'm adding liquidity and either selling a bit or rebuying sold bitcoins cheaper.  Bitpay needs bids to hit and so do you.  Lucky for you, I'm nice enough to provide asks too.

That's the side of trading I have no experience in. 

I've always thought of market makers as this weird creature forced to trade because somehow he keeps getting them and does not know what to do with them.

For me it's a win win.

I have quite a few bitcoins.  I'm willing to sell small amounts at these prices or higher.  I'm also long term bullish, so I'm willing to rebuy any sold bitcoins for cheaper.  If there is a big uptrend, I can get washed out, but bitcoin usually retraces.  If it doesn't, I have student loans to pay down.



13. Post 1990936 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: samurai1200 on May 01, 2013, 01:39:28 AM
I like lines. Not these ones though =(



Maybe, but that's a pretty small timeframe.



14. Post 2000698 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: byronbb on May 02, 2013, 01:45:15 AM
Incredible volumes. I remember when 10kUSD would move this market. Now we see a 2.5million sell off and we creep lower.

But nothing's changed.  We'll be in single digits soon  Tongue



15. Post 2001025 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: y2kcamaross on May 02, 2013, 02:38:30 AM
Ugh, this is the worst part about going to sleep, having to figure out what price I should place my buy orders

every 1% down to what you think might be the minimum price... adjust the size of the orders to invest as much as you want



16. Post 2001163 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: y2kcamaross on May 02, 2013, 02:46:22 AM
Ugh, this is the worst part about going to sleep, having to figure out what price I should place my buy orders

every 1% down to what you think might be the minimum price... adjust the size of the orders to invest as much as you want


That'd be helpful if I had any clue what the minimum price would be ;p

You'll never get that right, which is why you go to the extra effort to get a decent average price no matter where it bottoms.



17. Post 2013597 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: underground_ on May 03, 2013, 05:04:43 AM


Just remember the y axis is different for the two series on the bottom, so the crossover is arbitrary.  See the longer term chart for more perspective: http://blockchained.com/depth_mtgox.png

There is certainly a change happening though.



18. Post 2014393 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: billington.mark on May 03, 2013, 07:13:15 AM
Did you even look at the chart above your post? A monumental amount of btc would need to be sold for us to get into the 80s. Doubt it'll happen.

Slow climb to 105 over the weekend is what I see

You obviously haven't been watching walls that long.

Hint: Those orders can be pulled lower at any time by automated trading programs.



19. Post 2023362 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: DavidBAL on May 04, 2013, 08:16:13 AM
China to the rescue... in my opinion cctv story is a big deal.. btc search volume is exploding there... http://index.baidu.com/main/word.php?word=%B1%C8%CC%D8%B1%D2



709 Yuan = 115.18 USD



20. Post 2023469 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: HerrDoktor on May 04, 2013, 08:41:47 AM
Damnit China, I was promised cheap coins!!!

You had your chance Wink

I would say its never too late  Grin

I would say never say never.

But I'd say as long as we're still under $1000 it's not too late.



21. Post 2044864 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: fitty on May 06, 2013, 06:57:21 AM
When do you see this happening? I would think the influx of investors on Tuesday would necessitate it happening before then.

Why would a bunch of new money on Tuesday cause the price to go sub-$100?

He's saying the influx makes it necessary for a such a dip, if it is going to happen, to occur before the new money arrives.



22. Post 2054627 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on May 06, 2013, 11:57:54 PM
I love sitting on the sidelines with my bitcoins just watching the madness. The debating, the speculation, the sob stories and the cheers. So glad I'm not fighting the market right now.

That, dollar cost averaging, and automated market making are the only trading methods I recommend in this market.



23. Post 2056157 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: SlipperySlope on May 07, 2013, 02:35:44 AM
I love sitting on the sidelines with my bitcoins just watching the madness. The debating, the speculation, the sob stories and the cheers. So glad I'm not fighting the market right now.

That, dollar cost averaging, and automated market making are the only trading methods I recommend in this market.

Would you care to share your trading rules for automated market making?

Most of it is published here:  github.com/yrral86/rubybot

At the moment it is completely undocumented and there are a few bugfixes in my local version I need to push out.  When the semester is over and I get caught up on sleep I'll be sinking some time into cleaning it up, documentation, and then some new features.



24. Post 2056457 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 07, 2013, 04:09:24 AM


what the hell this chart means?
 Huh

Green are bids, red are asks, left to right is price, front to back is time (each chart is 1 hour), up to down is volume

like mtgoxlive.com, but with time added as a dimension



25. Post 2056627 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on May 07, 2013, 04:36:39 AM
Okay I am ready for the price to drop now. Sub 100 coins sound great.

No, it really doesn't. It will do nothing but make people lose confidence in the coin.
Unless you think that is a good thing ofcourse.

Welcome to bitcoin, hope you make it out alive.

What's that supposed to mean?

There aren't very many bitcoins.  Unless you can hold onto your coins when the gut wrenching dips happen this market will chew you up and spit you out.



26. Post 2057253 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on May 07, 2013, 06:06:47 AM


I think chartbuddy is broken Sad



27. Post 2061871 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Richy_T on May 07, 2013, 04:25:58 PM

Quote
Major Human Flaw: Some people refer to themselves in the third person.


Explanation by Elsa Ronningstam, associate clinical professor of psychology at Harvard Medical School and author of Identifying and Understanding the Narcissistic Personality: Referring to yourself in the third person creates distance between "I" and "he." So if you have an exaggerated view of how great you are, you could be using this distance to make yourself even bigger. Or, if you've achieved major success suddenly, using the third person could be a way to adjust to the bigger role that's been assigned to you. It's a way to enlarge yourself to fit that role.



Richy_T concurs.

Not me.



28. Post 2068243 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: arklan on May 08, 2013, 05:01:20 AM
What.  Out of all possibilities a few hours ago, this one seemed the most unlikely.

It is called a "cup-and-handle". It is a very bullish formation.

I will be able to post a summary of my trades in Gox in 5.-7. May to this thread if it is deemed to be orderly, and there is at least some public demand. I am quite satisfied with the outcome, and would like the others to learn the secrets as well. Please don't contact me personally if you are not willing and/or able to pay my consulting fee of 10,000mBTC/hour, prepaid in the increments of 15 minutes.

Are you legit autistic?

as someone on the autism spectrum, i can safely say he may well be nuts, but autistic? nah.

ten btc an hour consulting fee, prepaid in 15 minute increments... i really have no words to express my thoughts on this. even if his trading advice was reliably good.

narcissism seems to fit



29. Post 2068890 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Rampion on May 08, 2013, 06:58:22 AM
BTW: who uses bots to trade? Smoothie? Rpietila? Anybody?

I do.

Also,

Head and shoulders?



30. Post 2068918 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Hawker on May 08, 2013, 07:02:53 AM
Where do we expect the roller coaster to take us today?  Towards $90 or towards $130?

I anticipate at least one more run at $100 before we can try $130.  If $100 breaks with volume, 90 will be the next battle ground.  If $100 holds, we can try up.



31. Post 2069011 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: smoothie on May 08, 2013, 07:14:24 AM
BTW: who uses bots to trade? Smoothie? Rpietila? Anybody?

I do.

Also,

Head and shoulders?

Can you clarify where the neckline you are envisioning being breached in that pattern?

I see one but wanted to see if we are looking at the same thing.

Thanks

Tangential to the bottoms on the 5th and 7th.  That puts the neckline around $100 currently with a slightly negative slope.  If we do test the supposed neckline and it holds, we will have a nice solid double bottom for a decent short term rally.  If it breaks, the long term picture starts to look a bit more grim, but my market maker bot will be there to pick up cheap coins from panic sellers all the way down.



32. Post 2071430 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: lebing on May 08, 2013, 11:54:42 AM


Bids now over 20mm again, last time they were there we were over 150. We are going up.

Asks are way higher this time.



33. Post 2077361 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 08, 2013, 08:02:38 PM
I'm still thinking it's going to be a very very heavy sell off. I don't know man, just got this tickling feeling in my tummy. Sad

I hope you're right.  I've got bid orders at the ready.  If you're wrong, I'll just have to make a student loan payment.



34. Post 2082241 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: deathcode on May 09, 2013, 05:04:41 AM
Man, MtGox still down? If only there was something else. Some other "site" on the "web" which could "act" as an "exchange" "besides" "Mtgox".


oh hay my quotation mark key is broke.

what are you talking about?? MtGox is up..

Works for me.



35. Post 2083027 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: UltimateReaper on May 09, 2013, 07:05:37 AM
Hello?

Is anybody out there?

one trade on mtgox came through in the past 10 minutes...

Is it my internet?

where is everybody?






36. Post 2087219 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: molecular on May 09, 2013, 02:39:08 PM
How cool is it that the bearish highs and bullish lows have converged on the one month anniversary of the big crash from 266?

Mere coincidence or divine forces at work? Cheesy

There's nothing "divine" about a month, though. arbitrary human construct, no?

Maybe not divine, but a month is not arbitrary.  It is based on the lunar cycle.



37. Post 2089836 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 09, 2013, 06:32:06 PM



*yawns*

Go set up a store to sell something for bitcoins.



38. Post 2089848 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Odalv on May 09, 2013, 06:32:40 PM
Gox login:


Attempt to hack ?


Yes.  *.mtgox.com has a different cert than mtgox.com.  It has always been this way.



39. Post 2089968 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Odalv on May 09, 2013, 06:38:18 PM
Gox login:

Attempt to hack ?

Yes.  *.mtgox.com has a different cert than mtgox.com.  It has always been this way.

I do not understand. I think I always use bookmark(but I'm not sure) -> same url

When you use www.mtgox.com you get the startcom cert.  They use the same cert for data.mtgox.com, classic.mtgox.com and others.
When you use mtgox.com you get the verisign cert.  This is only used on the main exchange interface.



40. Post 2091092 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: TiagoTiago on May 09, 2013, 08:34:15 PM
A stable sine wave of about 20USD of amplitude and about 15 minutes of wavelength for a few days would be nice...

My market making bot would make bank wallet.dat.



41. Post 2096149 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 10, 2013, 07:46:48 AM
It's happening?!

nope



42. Post 2096220 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: wonkytonky on May 10, 2013, 08:00:07 AM

people buying this amount are thinking longer term..  them expect the price to go up in the future. so it's a bullish indicator ... unless it's lended money(and would be a stupid move to make right now).. then it will come down again if price doesn't move up much Smiley

one trader being long term bullish does not mean the market can move through the current resistance in the short term



43. Post 2096254 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fitty on May 10, 2013, 08:03:38 AM
This is called market making and is very healthy/quite useful. From what I hear, mature markets all have this type of behavior in very large volumes.

For bitcoin, it allows entities like bitpay, coinbase, etc to operate with limited slippage.

For Bitcoin I agree it's a good thing. I personally prefer volatility, bloodshed, panic, despair, exuberance and then of course exhaustion. I guess the roller coaster has to slow down at some point, at least for awhile. Wink

Just wait... any market makers that have too tight a clamp on the market will get washed out as soon as we break out decisively.



44. Post 2100745 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: 100x on May 10, 2013, 04:07:16 PM
[zzomgimg]http://www.rtcons.com/wall/15835.14.png[/img]
We really need an hourly autoposter? We can't just look at your web page if we want to?

It's posting under ChartBuddy so you can easily click ignore.

Most hours, it's the only post on topic. Is it really holding you back from seeing the cool animated gifs? Once an hour seems pretty good to me.

Thing is, regular bitcoinity wall pics are actually more useful. You can't really tell much about the walls with the 3d pic. It has a cool novelty factor, but that wears off pretty quickly. I have ignored the ChartBuddy  Tongue

Good for you.   I like it and would prefer if it continued.  I don't understand the impulse many people seem to have that anything they don't like should be banned (not you deepceleron, you took care of the problem instead of making a stink.  You only commented after it was brought up).  Three cheers for ChartBuddy!



45. Post 2100958 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 10, 2013, 05:32:06 PM
My gut is screaming bull trap

My gut is screaming bull trap, bear market, capitulation, and bear trap all at the same time.


Getting mixed signals here.

Sounds like you just have indigestion.



46. Post 2103774 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 10, 2013, 09:34:27 PM
My own little nagging to the bears.  Grin






47. Post 2126104 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Babylon on May 12, 2013, 09:42:32 PM
$1M usd disappeared today from the order book.

We may see cheap coins soon  Grin

The speculation game seems a lot like warfare.  Did the army actually withdraw, or did they want to make you believe they withdrew before attacking?

All I know is that the $1m that was removed was at under $50 USD.

Could have removed it to wait and put it back in higher.

Or to spike the price with a market order.



48. Post 2126384 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: samson on May 12, 2013, 11:57:07 PM
It can last weeks.

That's not very long in the grand scheme of things.

I beg to differ. Confidence is about knowing we won't tank. Compare with 2011. We're doing pretty good.

And what happens if we do tank?

The price will probably go down to sub $50 levels and eventually rebound after a period of consolidation.

It will be a very good buying opportunity but calling the real low won't be easy as there will be many lows with 'bounces' on the way down.

Fuck calling a bottom, buy every x% down.  If you want to get a better price and trust there will be a lot more downward movement, increase the order size at each level.



49. Post 2127877 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Dumbastronaut on May 13, 2013, 03:55:09 AM
Chartbuddy stop spamming

Dumbastronaut stop spamming



50. Post 2128538 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Pzi4nk on May 13, 2013, 05:05:01 AM

If you find the 3-D depth chart unhelpful, then simply ignore the Chartbuddy user - its a bot.


I just find it confusing. How is one to interpret the chart?

mtgoxlive.com over time... each post is snapshots taken over the previous hour



51. Post 2135790 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: wonkytonky on May 13, 2013, 09:18:41 PM
wall is gone too Smiley   i wish it stayed there.. a panic buy could have eaten it so easy..

I guess we're fresh out of panic buyers then.



52. Post 2135894 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: ManBearPig on May 13, 2013, 09:30:11 PM
I considered myself relatively mentally unstable until I stumbled upon certain people's posts on this forum.

It's a pity that ignore doesn't work with quotes...

Dude, we're all crazy.  It's the people that think they are sane you have to worry about.



53. Post 2136002 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Rampion on May 13, 2013, 09:43:03 PM
big sell wall pushing the price down.  Is it a short and distort?
Its an Idiot Wall. Either an idiot trying to push the price down, or an idiot thinking they were 'selling into (non-existent) strength' when it was rising up to 118, hahaha. Seems more likely to be someone trying to push it down.

You can't speculatively (profitably) long bitcoins, you can only short. So it's probably some supernode trying their capabilities (American likely), but I will be impressed only after breaching $.11. If I can do $.119->$.09752 in 3 days, surely others can do even better!  Grin

Um, you mention the word 'supernode' quite often but I don't understand what you mean by it.

Quote
0.0th class supernode = BTC1M
0.5th class supernode = BTC100,000
1.0st class supernode = BTC10,000
1.5th class supernode = BTC3,000
2.0nd class supernode = BTC1,000
2.5th class supernode = BTC300
3.0th class supernode = BTC100

3th... threeth?



54. Post 2148547 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: sve9mark on May 14, 2013, 08:53:15 PM
some bears are going to get burned ...severley  

The odd thing is, if you think MtGox is about to get owned by the US Govt, you need to BUY bitcoins and move them off the exchange.

This was my thought too.  This also leads to the theory that it's really just a couple guys trying to manipulate and buy back more coinage then they started with.

well lets wait how this ones playing out... I am holding this one for now

MtGox is a cancer on the Bitcoin ecosystem, it would be great long term news if people left there in droves. Like I said, buy bitcoins, move them off the site if you're actually scared. The last thing I'd go is have them wire me money, DHS could have told every bank in the US to freeze any incoming wires from them.

This all still seems a little iffy. I'm surprised Dwolla would mention lawsuits no one can find record of, and MtGox would have no idea (they still list Dwolla as a withdrawal method). Seems like poor taste by Dwolla (who's CEO has blogged his support of Bitcoin) to say it's now "illegal to deal with MtGox". A lawsuit doesn't make it illegal, the DHS orders if they exist also sound questionable. If it's not a hoax it's a poorly worded notification from Dwolla.

Regardless if MtGox worries you, move *coins* off the exchange, not fiat.

This is a dramatic development to say the least. My first thought is that it is due to the Coinbase lawsuit against GOX. Is this a move by the DOJ due to the court case, or is this a move by Homeland Security in relation to a money laundering investigation? Wow. I hope its due to the lawsuit. I am very glad I trade with CampBX. This could actually be great news if it is due to the lawsuit, as MT Gox having a monopoly over the bitcoin market is detrimental to bitcoins core philosophy of decentralization.

If you haven't yet, US residents should consider opening a CampBX account and transfer out of MT Gox. If you wish you can use my referral link to get a 10% lifetime discount of trading fees (disclosure: I get a 10% discount as well): https://CampBX.com/register.php?r=X8IT0iRWMOA

Coinbase != Coinlab



55. Post 2150356 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: klee on May 14, 2013, 11:49:36 PM
Who is buying now at 110-112$ range? People who sold at what price? 150$? More? Less?

I'm buying and selling every 1.1%.



56. Post 2150383 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 15, 2013, 12:03:15 AM
Who is buying now at 110-112$ range? People who sold at what price? 150$? More? Less?

I'm buying and selling every 1.1%.

MtGox must be in love with you.

They make more than I do from my trading, but I still do okay.  If I can get my volume up a bit I'll have lower fees.



57. Post 2150660 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: DougTanner on May 15, 2013, 12:34:12 AM
Whoa, when did we hit $103?



Just now.



58. Post 2150839 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: computerlamp on May 15, 2013, 12:59:30 AM
NOOOOO, I missed pg 420 xD

Also this crash is due to the dwolla thing, if you think otherwise then that's cool too I guess, I for sure can't change your mindset.

But it's due to dwolla seizure.

That is all.

We're all glad you're here to tell us what the truth is.



59. Post 2153755 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 15, 2013, 08:31:11 AM
Holy slippage!  Cheesy

This guy really wanted in.

100 trades in the last 12 hours with a 1.1% spread... we could use some more liquidity, although I'm happy to take the profits for providing what I'm willing to provide.



60. Post 2174026 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 16, 2013, 10:04:28 PM
It's pure Gox-comedy that this was ever possible in the first place  Cheesy ...
 "Until now you could just pretend you had money or coins and place orders ..."

Bitstamp (rightly) won't let you do this. I'd be surprised if there are many exchanges on which this was ever possible. OK ... you can list something on Ebay that you don't have, but that's a bit different ...

The unfunded orders wouldn't show up in the public order book.  Just on your account with an insufficient funds error.  It was nice because if you only had one currency you could place a bid and an ask.  When the funded order filled your other order would activate.  Easy enough to script and not worth the performance hit though, so I support the move.



61. Post 2174117 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 16, 2013, 10:36:18 PM
Correct me, if I'm wrong, because I'm not really sure about the money supply definitions, but here are some numbers about that 300k prediction.

The current M1 money supply of USD, which, as far as I understood, is all the money which is not money out of thin air, is around 2.500 billion USD. We have around 11 million BTC. Our goal 300.000 USD/BTC would result in a market capitalization of 3.300 billion USD.

... ... Cheesy




Who is just talking about America?  Wink

Interesting thing I just heard. The actual inflation rate is more like 9.5% (taken from this economist - http://www.theaureport.com/pub/htdocs/expert.html?id=2000
So, just like the unemployment rate (which if we used 1980 stats would be closer to 23.5%) the inflation rate is really distorted.


You don't need an economist, just look at food prices.  It varies a bit from item to item, but everything is 5-20% more expensive than a year ago. And yes, food prices have been excluded from official inflation calculations.



62. Post 2177599 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: molecular on May 17, 2013, 05:52:33 AM
Sorry to steal the show, but even after spending 36 hours in an emergency care unit, I still think $1,000+ peak valuation is unstoppable before Christmas. My experiences tell that even the patients here are eager to buy by the truckload, as soon as they get into the position to do so. Not everyone was picked when he had all his belongings packed to two nice cabin bags (+the silver).

Rpietila selling Bitcoin in the psych ward.

I have to admit I like his style.


Or are we the psych ward?



63. Post 2177636 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: molecular on May 17, 2013, 05:56:19 AM
Sorry to steal the show, but even after spending 36 hours in an emergency care unit, I still think $1,000+ peak valuation is unstoppable before Christmas. My experiences tell that even the patients here are eager to buy by the truckload, as soon as they get into the position to do so. Not everyone was picked when he had all his belongings packed to two nice cabin bags (+the silver).

Rpietila selling Bitcoin in the psych ward.

I have to admit I like his style.


Or are we the psych ward?

Lol. Dr. Rpietila, I need my daily dose of Bitcoin bull talk, quick.

The patient has experienced an account seizure, 50cc of fiat, stat.



64. Post 2177653 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: HerrDoktor on May 17, 2013, 06:03:22 AM
Wow what happened ? I was away for a mere single day and instead of the Dwolla FUD price is back to 118 and rpietila is in a psychiatry ward ? Guess once you get involved with Bitcoin there is no more space for RL. This is madness  Cool

For some, bitcoin is real life.



65. Post 2178214 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: solex on May 17, 2013, 07:40:48 AM



Anyway you draw it, we seem to be out of the short term downtrend. I was a short term bear until today's mini rally. I dumped at 110 only to sit idly watching the ticker as it went down to 103 thinking sub 100... Bought back in at a loss at 118, we've been stable way too long and have broken through all the bearish trendlines. I really see no reason not to be long right now.

I called a uptrend to 130/140 area just before the Dwollar story broke. I think that this is still going to happen soon.


Sure, but we'll see it hit 108 first.



66. Post 2185486 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on May 17, 2013, 10:04:12 PM
Someone is slowly offloading a lot of coins on Bitstamp at pretty reasonable prices...

The rats are leaving the ship.
I think we can go as high as 20% cross exchange spread and gox under 50% of volume.

Gogogo.... flee the gox



67. Post 2194345 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 18, 2013, 08:26:30 PM
Look deeply into it. It is nothing.

Looking deeply into nothingness is not advisable.



68. Post 2202085 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: dakiller on May 19, 2013, 05:52:41 AM
I don't like the idea of bots posting like this, it is just spam. The charts themselves are 99% unintelligible in my opinion.

Ban it I say, if the owner has something worth sharing, he can share it himself

I don't understand it.  Kill it!

Roll Eyes

It only posts in this one thread.  If you don't like it you can ignore it.  Maybe if you learned to read it you might find it useful as well.



69. Post 2202217 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: nimda on May 19, 2013, 05:36:03 PM
My problem with ChartBuddy:

Absolutely illegible as soon as there's any movement at all

That's a fair point.  It shows a better view of asks than bids.  I'm not sure how to solve this.  A color gradation on a 2d plane may work okay, although a grey scale would work better for people with color vision problems.



70. Post 2215581 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Nolo on May 20, 2013, 08:43:01 PM
A friend in China mentioned today there's growing curiosity about BTC there after it was featured this weekend on CCTV.  It's made it to the daily hot topic on sina weibo.  Anyone want to speculate on whether/when this might be reflected in the exchanges?

We've discussed this quite a bit since the first CCTV news.  Word is that the latest news was neutral to somewhat positive. I think we are going to see adoption in China, both as a speculative investment but also because of the world economic situation. Something we have to consider also, is that people may start to get behind it as a big FU to the USD. That is probably why the government has been pretty open to it.

I imagine that over the next 6 months to a year that China will be the biggest holders of BTC. Just on population alone, it only takes a few thousand wealthy people to make that happen. Just a feeling of a guess.

As the price of BTC goes up, we either need to go to another term e.g. mBTC or do a split (if that is possible). With the latter no one loses holding power as with creating new shares. I just don't see people being as game to buy when the price is high. But, if it truly starts to grow and is seen as valuable, then mBTC will be the new term.

IAS

I agree.  It's psychological as much as anything.  When we start using mBTC as the standard, I would be surprised if the price didn't increase almost immediately.

If you're a nobody investor without much money, would you feel more comfortable bragging to your friends that that you bought into the BTC market for .1BTC or would you rather say I bought 10,000 mBTC?



I'd rather have the 10,000mBTC == 10BTC Tongue



71. Post 2218998 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Ares on May 21, 2013, 04:58:24 AM
woooo something happened!

Are you sure?



72. Post 2219274 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 21, 2013, 05:29:04 AM
stability is under rated Smiley

edit, you want action go play with AsicMiner stock, 2.5 btc each now  Wink

I already bought at 1.8 three days ago Tongue



73. Post 2220572 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: BitPirate on May 21, 2013, 08:38:40 AM
Let that spring coil just a little longer. Note how amazing a buying opportunity we have now with this shower of continuous good/great news and minimal price reaction. This time you don't even need to try to catch a falling knife. Easy, low-risk gains for the non-clueless.

I think it's just going to take one big buy to push people off the edge... I smell a panic buy coming on...

$70k would take us to $123 and wake up the bulls a bit, but we really need to see $125 fall if we want things to get exciting.



74. Post 2220621 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

But what if we get a panic sell instead Wink



75. Post 2229063 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: fitty on May 22, 2013, 12:32:07 AM
You know what is messed up is that a 100k BTC buy order should be pretty much instant. What follows it is the part that may cause lag but I always find it odd that when the market moves really quickly in either direction gox lags like fuck. It is embarassing.

Yup. I've done a fair bit of work with databases, there's no reason on earth a company that makes millions has a trading engine that lags that hard. Someone on reddit claims they calculated MtGox can handle 40 trades a second. 40?! Even 400 would be surprisingly low. Either they're stubborn and refuse to hire outside help. Or they don't want outside help because they are insider trading the fuck out of market orders. The more trades that queue up (during lag) the more they can make. Large market order? Hang on, lets buy up some limit orders from the front, re-sell them at the back of the market order and we never lose.

Mark Karpeles has stated they want to go legit in the US and it will cost 25M. Wait, 25M? You've maybe made 4-5M? You have 18 employees? Where's the other 20M+ coming from? He's either going to use our fiat or MtGox has been insider trading the fuck out of the exchange.

The only reason I can see them sticking with such a poorly designed/running trading engine, is because they don't want anyone seeing how it works. Combine that with the lofty goals they have and no way they could pay for them unless they've been ripping us off for years.

The whole site is shady, the CEO is shady, the sooner they're dead and gone the better.

Cool.  When is your exchange launching?



76. Post 2229558 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: fitty on May 22, 2013, 01:06:37 AM

Yup. I've done a fair bit of work with databases, there's no reason on earth a company that makes millions has a trading engine that lags that hard. Someone on reddit claims they calculated MtGox can handle 40 trades a second. 40?! Even 400 would be surprisingly low.

Agreed, they're slower by orders of magnitude than they should be.  A friend of mine works for a company that designs & programs custom hardware used by these high speed traders.  Order are processed in 1-10 microseconds, not tens of milliseconds.  The kicker is that they're been slow for years, which is inexcusable.  And they never bothered to rebrand to something bitcoin specific instead of Magic The Gather Online eXchange.

By comparison, this is what 10 milliseconds of stock trading of Merck looks like between various worldwide exchanges (London, NYSE, etc):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rB5jJuMP84E

I'm taking advantage of the lull in activity to cash out of Gox, and after their wire arrives, I'll send a wire to bitstamp.  I hope the exchange spread lasts until funds arrive.


Thank you.

Plenty of single server databases can do 1000s of queries a second. They've made millions. WTF. Anyone who has done any works on databases, should realize there's a huge problem when the trading engine lags 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes? Huh?

To show how bad it is, here's a simple example of how you can lag the fuck out of MtGox.

Break MtGox Engine

The fact this works, shows how poorly the whole setup is designed. But wait, I don't own an exchange, I should just be quiet. Despite the fact it's PAINFULLY obvious Gox is a pile of shit. And NotMe should change his sig because he doesn't have a clue about programming, or math. Sorry, you just don't. 


LOL... when did I comment on programming or math in this thread?  I agree that MtGox is crap, but complaining about it doesn't do any good.

Ad hominems don't make you right, and when they are baseless, they hurt your credibility.



77. Post 2229763 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: BitcoinAshley on May 22, 2013, 12:56:58 AM
Cool.  When is your exchange launching?

Oh right, unless you run an existing exchange, you can't possibility comment on how MtGox is run. Maybe those 7 people on the planet can chime in.

Are you 6 years old (and/or retarded)?


Fitty that cracked me up, thanks for the perfect response to the most retarded comeback to Gox criticism that is thrown around these parts  Grin Grin Grin

Sorry, I can only take so many YEARS of bitching and moaning about the same shit before I get sarcastic.  You've only had to put up with it for 3 months, so you probably have some patience left.  If he had added anything new, I wouldn't complain, but every point he brought up has been beat to death.




78. Post 2229956 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: fitty on May 22, 2013, 02:17:20 AM
LOL... when did I comment on programming or math in this thread?  I agree that MtGox is crap, but complaining about it doesn't do any good.

Ad hominems don't make you right, and when they are baseless, they hurt your credibility.

Ad hominems? What the fuck. From the guy throwing out the "let's see you do better" logical fallacy. But wait, you agree with me. Do you even know what ad hominem means? I already know I'm right (which you agree with), I'm just calling you out because it's baffling anyone would object to discussion of extremely concerning flaws in the trading engine and why after 3 years they refuse to address it despite the fact they have plenty of money. It had nothing to do with my argument, MtGox is indefensible, that's a given.

Your programming knowledge comes into question when you defend MtGoxs trading engine. "Where's your exchange" implies it's harder then it looks, I doubt you could do better, and they're not as awful as you're saying. Which is why I thought you were 6 years old (and/or retarded). It's hardly baseless, your reply does make me think you're autistic. Sorry.

Do you know what ad hominem means?
Quote
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an argument made personally against an opponent instead of against their argument.

Instead of addressing the topic, you called me retarded Roll Eyes.

Also, I never defended the MtGox trade engine.  It is harder than it looks, but mostly from a regulatory standpoint.  I agree their system is crap and could easily be improved upon.  But, instead of finding out the truth you make assumptions about me that lead you to believe I am of low intelligence.  I'm just tired of hearing the same shit repeated over and over.



79. Post 2229975 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: fitty on May 22, 2013, 02:31:57 AM
Sorry, I can only take so many YEARS of bitching and moaning about the same shit before I get sarcastic.  You've only had to put up with it for 3 months, so you probably have some patience left.  If he had added anything new, I wouldn't complain, but every point he brought up has been beat to death.

Apology not accepted. You should learn to control your nerd rage. It's offensive. The fact the lag continues after 3 years does open up new questions. It's clearly a fixable problem given the money they have. Why they won't bring in outside help to fix it is troubling.

There is a cool feature called ignore. There's also a cool feature called, "keep scrolling". Your mouse probably already has it. If it doesn't, they're pretty cheap. Look for the newfangled "scroll wheel". It's insane. It lets you scroll through the page really quickly. Skipping any shit you don't feel like reading. Crazy huh?

Next time you get REALLY REALLY upset at a post, take a time out. Here's 10 things you can try to make life on the internet a lot easier.

Mayo Clinic - Anger management: 10 tips to tame your temper

Lol... It wasn't an apology to you.  BitcoinAshley is actually a thoughtful member of the community.

You should learn to be nice.  You're offensive.  Being an asshole doesn't help anybody.

Anyway, congratulations, after 3 years on this board, you are the first one to make it on my ignore list.



80. Post 2230226 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

You seem to be having a nice conversation with yourself.  Please post louder, I can't hear you:





81. Post 2230238 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 22, 2013, 03:20:15 AM
Gentlemen, you can't fight here, this is the wall movement tracker hardcore.

Tongue



82. Post 2302329 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Abandon on May 29, 2013, 02:46:59 AM
A little bit of random speculation?

everytime we touched this resistance we moved up

-Missing Image-

This is interesting! Thanks for showing us this indicator.

Bullshit. Here is the graph: http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg90zig12-hourztgSzm1g10zm2g25zxzi1gOBVzvzcv

Start playing. For me the OBV does not look bullish at all but maybe it would help to know more about it than just gut feeling about a rising chart.

It did break through the support once, but it is mostly reliable, so I think it does have some meaning.

The only meaning it has is that a medium term bull trend has been broken if it breaks.



83. Post 2304951 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: niothor on May 29, 2013, 09:24:46 AM
And I have the bad feeling that we missed a one in a life time chance when we were in the spotlight to gain more people to use bitcoins.

Is that a feeling you would be willing to bet on?

For me it would be a safe bet
missed chance at least I won the bet / no missed chance at least my bitcoins will be worth more

In your case you risk to end up with a double loss. Smiley

Well that's one way of looking at it, but it's wrong.

I am willing to bet 1 BTC that within two years there will be at least 10 times as many people using Bitcoin than use it today, as indicated by the number of client downloads. If you really think it's a safe bet, and you really think we missed our chance to get users, put up.

Client downloads number is worth *******.
And , you assume a mass adoption with 10x number of people in two years? Are you joking?

We currently have 55k transactions a day (just double from the lowest point in 2012) , so 550k would be that amazing?
And remember , transactions outside the top100 (sd/pools etc.) are just half of it.



Bitcoin can't do more than about 605k transactions a day without a hard fork.



84. Post 2305128 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: niothor on May 29, 2013, 09:34:05 AM

Bitcoin can't do more than about 605k transactions a day without a hard fork.

Are you sure about that number?

From the page aepfel linked:

Quote
Today the Bitcoin network is restricted to a sustained rate of 7 tps by some artificial limits.

7*3600*24 = 604800



85. Post 2305242 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: niothor on May 29, 2013, 09:59:17 AM
That makes sense , my bad.

No worries.



86. Post 2324479 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Ultraviolet on May 30, 2013, 10:22:22 PM
Honestly I think if bots were gone in the long term we'd see the price totally collapse. There's no volume in the market, it just heads in whatever direction the nearest large buy/sell takes it while market maker bots give the impression that trades are happening. It's not exactly bullish. The only reason there aren't huge sells is because people are waiting for 135+ to dump everything they own while everyone who wants to buy is setting orders at 125 and below and waiting for a dump.

I miss the vibrance of the market in April/early May.

Market making bots buy definition only put orders on the book.  They only trade when some other entity places a market order.  How exactly does this lead to fake volume?



87. Post 2354611 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on June 03, 2013, 03:02:52 AM
What is likely going to be the bottom? 64? 80? 103? 110? 113?

0.0001? 0.001? 0.01? 0.1? 1?

I'm confused as to why this graph is generating so much panic in the forum today...

http://i.imgur.com/YbMyqyp.png?1

The trendline starting at 50 has been broken, but IMO the people panicing need to zoom out.  There are other, more long term trends that will provide support.  Sure, seeing 50 again is always a remote possibility, but I'll be buying the whole way down.



88. Post 2355363 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 03, 2013, 04:48:21 AM

fuck you adam

pretending to be drunk so your epenis seems a little larger?

You cant be drunk drinking gay drink like Coorlights
i don't feel soo good Lips sealed drank way too much

roll one

you might puke, but you'll feel better



89. Post 2368103 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Miz4r on June 04, 2013, 12:55:30 PM
Let me try again, I'm quite noobish at this. Tongue



Trendlines tend to be broken on the fourth touch.



90. Post 2368960 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 04, 2013, 02:30:56 PM
Quote
eBay Invoice Notification for Friday, May 31, 2013

Amount Due:                            C$16.46

wtf is this eBay Invoice Notification? i didn't buy no eBay Invoice Notification  Huh  Huh  Huh


this is why i prefer bitcoin.....

It is a phishing attempt.  Bitcoin services have also been impersonated like this.



91. Post 2369828 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 04, 2013, 03:29:14 PM
Quote
eBay Invoice Notification for Friday, May 31, 2013

Amount Due:                            C$16.46

wtf is this eBay Invoice Notification? i didn't buy no eBay Invoice Notification  Huh  Huh  Huh


this is why i prefer bitcoin.....

It is a phishing attempt.  Bitcoin services have also been impersonated like this.

no these are some real fees that i have to pay, i set my paypal to automatically pay these...

first you get hit with ebay fees for selling stuff on their site
then you get chargebacks.
then you get paypal fees for other reasons.
then you get your paypal account hacked and your fund are stuck in limbo for ever   Cheesy


but seriously, ebay & paypal takes a significant fee... doesn't look like much a few $ here and there, but it all add up and the total cost of doing business with ebay is pretty high...

Bummer



92. Post 2375643 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: giszmo on June 05, 2013, 04:40:17 AM
Indeed, I've heard you're officially allowed to enter the circle jerk that makes up this thread. You stop following your own analysis and start expecting bitcoin to go up because well, it's bitcoin! I can't wait till I get to 684!

Not really.
Most bears have an old or high number posts account.

There was a thread once where somebody promised quite some reward for the best guess of the bitcoin price by some date. Back then I also did the analysis of how bullishness/bearishness correlates to the post count. It turned out there was a clear correlation between spread and post count. The more posts the more they agreed on a moderately higher price.

Damn. Found it. I post too much: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=138028.msg1472018#msg1472018



And the price was higher on the date in question.  So the question is, if you did the same study right before the price goes down, would high post count still correlate with high estimates, or would it correlate with correct estimates?



93. Post 2377171 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: sarc on June 05, 2013, 09:52:47 AM


Go on, crash, you know it makes sense...

But also consider what it means if it doesn't.  This is also a possibility.



94. Post 2381126 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: italeffect on June 05, 2013, 05:20:35 PM


lol 70 mins




95. Post 2386860 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 05, 2013, 11:20:25 PM
But I still think Bitcoin is currently overvalued.  Wink

The truth is, outside speculation, bitcoin is only supported by silkroad. Imagine speculators leaving, and silkroad shutting down.

Such an original idea Roll Eyes.  People having been making this comment for more than 2 years now and it is even less true today.



96. Post 2386900 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 06, 2013, 02:30:48 AM
Ah yes, I see the Bitcoin, bible thumping, delusions continue.  

"Silk Road, no.  We have a bunch of legitamate businesses."

"Oh really?  Which ones?"

"Umm...well...we have a bunch of VC money coming in."

 Grin

Bitcoin the currency commodity. Great for speculators and dope dealers.   Wink

Yeah it's funny how that guy refused to answer about his guess on ratio bitcoins being spen on services/goods of silkroad vs everywhere else. But maybe it's just coincidence and he went to bed  Roll Eyes

Or maybe he got tired of beating his head on a brick wall.
Quote
ATLANTA -- April 2, 2013 -- BitPay Inc, the world’s leading payment processor for bitcoin, announces it has processed over $5.2 million in bitcoin transactions for its merchants during the month of March, with over 5,100 completed invoices during the month.  The pace accelerated with over $3 million in transactions during the final 8 days.  This eCommerce activity from merchants selling computers, consumer electronics, precious metals, and even government services has likely eclipsed the illicit activity widely estimated from sites like Silk Road.
http://blog.bitpay.com/2013/04/bitpay-eclipses-silk-road-in-bitcoin.html



97. Post 2399776 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: el_rlee on June 07, 2013, 10:06:51 AM
There any news? Are just sales after the dump last week?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=77.0

Edit: It appears bitcoin is out.  Kissing is the new currency of the future Tongue



98. Post 2399890 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: barbs on June 07, 2013, 10:26:10 AM
this thread is always the only thing keeping me sane during these movements.

Just a question of calling the bottom!

Lol... If your trading strategy involves calling the bottom, you need to improve your risk management.



99. Post 2400227 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 11:09:12 AM
Btw , the hasrate has dropped by 14k today  Huh

http://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

That is within normal variance.



100. Post 2400238 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: rdsc on June 07, 2013, 11:14:27 AM
Btw , the hasrate has dropped by 14k today  Huh

http://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

Coinotron has been down for the last 20 mins - would that do it?

No coinotron is not anywhere near that large, and that estimate is only good after you average at least a week.  You can't see day to day changes due to the wide variance.



101. Post 2400268 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 11:20:53 AM
Btw , the hasrate has dropped by 14k today  Huh

http://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

That is within normal variance.

Yeah,  I saw that it can drop sharp but to me as a non miner (anymore) was and still is a puzzle.
How do 10% of the people decide to power off their rigs same day  Huh Huh

They don't.  What I'm saying is that the data can show that dip even if mining power was constant or even increasing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance



102. Post 2400330 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 11:30:39 AM
Btw , the hasrate has dropped by 14k today  Huh

http://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

That's just variance.



Let me spread some panic ...
I love those bear gifs when the price drops Smiley


7150 coins till 110;)

You'll have to do better than that if you want to cause panic around here.



103. Post 2400359 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 11:35:54 AM
Btw , the hasrate has dropped by 14k today  Huh
http://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate
That's just variance.
Let me spread some panic ...
I love those bear gifs when the price drops Smiley
7150 coins till 110;)

You'll have to do better than that if you want to cause panic around here.

Being not a bull , and not a bear, I'm just a little padawan in the arts of manipulation Smiley)))
But I will do my learning.



Hint: Unless you have massive amounts of funds at your disposal, you will not manipulate price.  You will never do it by posting on this forum (unless you hugely overexpose yourself using leverage and then brag about it Tongue).



104. Post 2400651 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: JSMill on June 07, 2013, 12:13:07 PM
Any predictions for price movement over the weekend?

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



105. Post 2402798 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 17, 2013, 08:01:19 AM
Sure, but we'll see it hit 108 first.

Quote.
Just 'cause.  Wink

Like I said... we'll see it hit 108 before we see it hit 140 Tongue



106. Post 2402846 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 07, 2013, 04:17:06 PM
Slightly oversold:


waiting for Heavily oversold  Cool

+1



107. Post 2403032 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on June 07, 2013, 04:29:21 PM
Falling knives...no match for me.  How do you recifiy a $116.xx position, when the markets crashing and with no fiat left?  

BTC -> Ripple -> Sell BTC for XRP -> Sell XRP for USD.  Voila...you have fiat for the panic sell and you lost merely crumbs in the process.  At current prices, it's looking like the move of the century.

 Grin

I just had to share that because that was absolutely insane what I did...and it totally worked.   Cool



And what USD price did you end up with for your BTC?



108. Post 2405128 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: internationalaw on June 07, 2013, 08:00:45 PM
Hoarding is just another word for "saving"...Something more people with traditional fiat should do.

+1



109. Post 2405244 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 08:14:35 PM
8.50000?
Huh

37.2



110. Post 2410655 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on June 08, 2013, 11:37:21 AM
People who went "all in" at 50 do care.

I'm all in and I don't give a shit. I will fall and raise with BTC  Wink

Ideology is clouding your judgment.  Selling high and buying more of what you believe in lower, is a smarter move.

Only if you are able to predict the future.



111. Post 2410679 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 08, 2013, 11:48:13 AM
Ok , I won't get it and I refuse to undestrand why bitcoin price has to go down in order to bounce back to 110+.

Second. I refuse to undestand how some of you can preach is a store of value when you expect it's value to halve in one- two weeks time.

Dude... it has only been above 30 for three months now.  Unless you bought in the middle of a hype cycle you have at least tripled your money at these prices.  However, I'm guessing based on your posts that you in fact did buy during the hype cycle.  Don't worry... in 6 months to a year we'll have another one.  Zoom the fuck out and relax.



112. Post 2410812 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 08, 2013, 11:56:02 AM
Ok , I won't get it and I refuse to undestrand why bitcoin price has to go down in order to bounce back to 110+.

Second. I refuse to undestand how some of you can preach is a store of value when you expect it's value to halve in one- two weeks time.

Dude... it has only been above 30 for three months now.  Unless you bought in the middle of a hype cycle you have at least tripled your money at these prices.  However, I'm guessing based on your posts that you in fact did buy during the hype cycle.  Don't worry... in 6 months to a year we'll have another one.  Zoom the fuck out and relax.

Based on my post you could have understand that I don't give a f** about price.

I only bought coins for use and all. And opened a new wallet every time so I really don't have a clue how many bitcoins I still have in reality.

Whats i'm only intereste right now is its evolution. (and the people behind)

You sure spend a lot of time talking about price for someone who doesn't give a fuck about it.



113. Post 2411040 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 08, 2013, 12:25:46 PM
You sure spend a lot of time talking about price for someone who doesn't give a fuck about it.

Well , isn't that because people here in the economy sub section only think about price?
Good news , bad news , the only thing affected is the price.
Nobody cares about the number of transaction , actual companies dealing in bitcoins.

Price will have to skyrocket for mass adoption and new start-ups to flock in.

Let's asumme that ATM is launched and functional.
First thing people are going to say is "price will skyrocket" only a few will say , i'm burning my credit card.

And  about my free time , I have lots of it.
I can afford the luxury of doing nothig while I'm attending university for my second "piece of paper" as i like to call it.

So you don't care about it, but you talk about it just to fit in?  That's sad.

As for
Quote
Nobody cares about the number of transaction , actual companies dealing in bitcoins.

That's just not true.  I monitor both of these.  You seem to be making a lot of assumptions about this community that just don't hold.



114. Post 2411185 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: sarc on June 08, 2013, 01:12:03 PM
wow, those bid walls to 105 are impressive, do you think it could be this that scaring the whales?


more and more coins to market, less and less fiat - less than 13 million now...

Zoom out... it's not so bad yet.




115. Post 2468998 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: circuitry on June 13, 2013, 11:50:10 PM


How are the EMA in this one different from the ones at Moody's?

Click settings... it will tell you the periods.  Moody's uses 10 and 21.



116. Post 2470369 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 14, 2013, 03:59:02 AM
Roar.

That all you got?



117. Post 2475337 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: rpietila on June 14, 2013, 08:13:48 AM
Nothing of the same generation can surpass Mt.Gox. We need the Dealer Network, developed here.

I think it takes about 3 weeks from this day to the inauguration of the daily fixing. I mean that you can skip gox from that day on doing OTC. 3 months for this to take out the volume from Gox also.

You know, I used to trade locally, but I live in the US and I am completely clueless as to what I need to do in order to continue trading legally.  If you figure that out, let me know and I'd be happy trade with your network.



118. Post 2475493 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: SGExodus on June 14, 2013, 04:37:48 PM
I wonder how much posts from cypherdoc thread influence the price

As much as Paul the Octopus influenced the result of the world cup matches..

I'd guess much less now that his service costs $250 a month.



119. Post 2506402 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: wonkytonky on June 18, 2013, 05:48:29 AM
Wow, some nice buys coming in. Looks like our buyer got tired of slowly buying.

I think it's the same pool of money waiting to buy bitcoin at sub $90 price, but lost their patient and decide to buy them at higher price now.
Wink 

it's that time again..   ..
4h ema's about to cross..   
buy a load of coins..      let people think that it this time will be different..

dump shitload! buy coins cheaper..

And what is the scaling factor between a load and a shitload?  Are the 10 loads in a shitload? 100? 1000?



120. Post 2516348 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: giszmo on June 19, 2013, 03:53:51 AM



Meta:
It's time to start a new Wall Observer:


Need more replies.



121. Post 2528078 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 20, 2013, 07:18:09 AM
I won't deny some people who go to homeopaths feel or even get better.  But until experiments can isolate 'water memory' as being the most likely factor there's a long list of probable causes to explore before we can reasonably assume there is anything in it.

It's called the placebo effect.

This is entirely true.  And it highlights the power of our minds to overcome physical reality, at least within the bounds of our bodies.



122. Post 2528204 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 20, 2013, 07:38:07 AM
Sorry, but I studied crime in school at the bachelors and masters level. I've seen the numerous studies. The only counter argument that has any validity is that it is lighter outside during full moons, but criminals tend to like darker places...

You can comment upon anothers experiences but that is all you can do. It is quite individual. I'll go with the "primitive" peoples of the world who understand the dream world better. Speaking of, I have studied dreams for years and the correlation between full moons and dreaming is quite obvious. Now, if you practice recording dreams for 10+ years like me and you have first hand experience, then I'm all ears. But I have a feeling that most that comment, well, are just commenting.

It's about sharing.  But for some, their brand of arrogance is too strong to see the wisdom staring them in the face.  They believe there is only the I, alone and without outside influence.  They fear sharing.



123. Post 2537905 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 21, 2013, 04:04:45 AM
http://blog.bitpay.com/2013/06/important-update-on-bitpay-exchange.html

Quote
Effective immediately, BitPay has temporarily stopped using Mt. Gox for determining the exchange rate for our invoices.

The rate calculation that BitPay uses for each invoice is now as follows:

1.  Pull the full Level II market depth, on the bid side, from multiple exchanges.

2.  Merge the market depths into one Consolidated Level II table.

3.  Calculate the blended clearing price for the amount of the invoice, assuming an auto-routing market sell order across all exchanges, with zero commission.

So... who's the market price now?  Cheesy

BitPay is only offering $99/btc before their fee (another 1%).



124. Post 2544480 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: fr33d0miz3r on June 21, 2013, 09:20:14 PM
2. Or they all are on IRC trying to understand what really is going on

How can I connect to their IRC channel?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=bitcoin+irc&l=1



125. Post 2569619 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 24, 2013, 08:43:45 PM
(...) that's why we're having this brain dead market that should be rising, but instead it is fighting against this insanity. The market doesn't want to go down, but it might, because of the people who believe it will.

 Roll Eyes

LOL.... somehow the market has a different opinion than the market.



126. Post 2569879 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 24, 2013, 09:14:09 PM
Oversold and overbought only applies in a ranging market as trend reversals. When in a trending market, moving into overbought/oversold is to be regarded as the confirmation, and leaving it as a possible trend reversal.

Check it out:

]http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/chart.png?width=940&m=mtgoxUSD&SubmitButton=Draw&r=90&i=&c=1&s=2012-12-01&e=2013-05-01&Prev=&Next=&t=S&b=&a1=&m1=20&a2=&m2=10&x=1&i1=RSI&i2=&i3=&i4=&v=0&cv=0&ps=0&l=0&p=0&

This.  Also, overbought and oversold are dependent on the time frame you are discussing.  As you can see above, on the daily scale we are nowhere near oversold.



127. Post 2569987 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Abandon on June 24, 2013, 09:24:36 PM
Oversold and overbought only applies in a ranging market as trend reversals. When in a trending market, moving into overbought/oversold is to be regarded as the confirmation, and leaving it as a possible trend reversal.

Check it out:

]http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/chart.png?width=940&m=mtgoxUSD&SubmitButton=Draw&r=90&i=&c=1&s=2012-12-01&e=2013-05-01&Prev=&Next=&t=S&b=&a1=&m1=20&a2=&m2=10&x=1&i1=RSI&i2=&i3=&i4=&v=0&cv=0&ps=0&l=0&p=0&

This.  Also, overbought and oversold are dependent on the time frame you are discussing.  As you can see above, on the daily scale we are nowhere near oversold.

That's what I'm referring to. Indicators are only used to see if a market might be oversold or not. Try looking at the Accumulation / Distribution of 2013 in comparison to 2011 to get an idea of the big picture.

I don't get it.  You're telling me to look at the big picture while screaming the market is oversold based on some short term wiggles.  Longer term we are nowhere near oversold.



128. Post 2571675 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Voodah on June 25, 2013, 12:49:46 AM
Oversold:


Loved this graph.

Can someone please explain to me what are each of the 3 or 4 graphs in the lower area?

They are all various types of oscillators that do indeed show oversold condition on the 4 hour interval.  However, we are neither oversold on the daily nor weekly interval.  People new to trading tend to be myopic and miss the longer term conditions that control the overall trend.



129. Post 2588189 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: MickeyT2008 on June 26, 2013, 08:42:56 PM
BTC-e, Bter and Vicurex are all still down

What's going on, DDoS?

I don't know, it wouldn't surprise me.  LTC gains value due to the Gox news of it being included soon, suddenly the alt-currency exchanges are all under attack - but from who?  (US government or banks? (same thing)).  It seems very unlikely that they'd all have system failures simultaneously.  Who stands to gain from this?

Traders who want to shake confidence.



130. Post 2588630 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: MAbtc on June 26, 2013, 09:25:52 PM
Ripple is great, IMO. It has incredible potential as a payment system and is far more versatile than bitcoin in that regard. In that way, since you can move in and out of so many currencies and IOU issuers, Ripple could be very useful for arbitraging. Too early at this point, though.

Ripple will either end with a whimper, as people realize what a bad idea it is, or with a bang, as people find out what a bad idea it is.

Bad idea, why? Do tell. If, like most detractors, you base this on the debt/trust system's potential for collapse, you should probably stay away from bitcoin exchanges as well.

So trusting a registered, established business is just as risky as trusting someone you don't know anything about who happens to be a friend of a friend of a friend?



131. Post 2589082 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: MAbtc on June 26, 2013, 10:12:33 PM
No. But only foolish people who care so little about money not to do a basic level of research will fall into this. If someone is careless enough to simply assume that extending trust is meaningless, without doing a modicum of research, he shouldn't be using Ripple. My advice to newbies: if you aren't willing to learn about Ripple, don't use it. Same goes for bitcoin -- lots of lost coins out there due to very careless people.

You should only trust an established business. If you want to trust your friend, just like IRL, he may never pay you back. I don't understand this idea that people need to trust everyone they know. That's just part of a marketing scheme to make Ripple more relevant to the average user. If my friends or family needed money, we'd figure out a way to get it to them. I don't need to extend trust to every single person (so that I never know whether or not my funds are liquid). If someone needs BTC, I can get them where they need to go easily and without any risk via Ripple.

I would agree insofar that people will make mistakes and get burned. Just like with everything else.

But that's just it.  Ripple is being marketed as a social network not a trusted exchange backbone system.



132. Post 2589103 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: pheaonix on June 26, 2013, 10:19:37 PM
www.ripplescam.org

also tradefort's btc giveaway Cheesy

ripple is a long term scam with serious problems. i could steal over 100 btc today if i wanted to, using its flawed system to trade fake ious with legit ones seamlessly out of peoples wallets. to compare ripple to bitcoin is like comparing unicycles to ferraris.

You can only replace the legit ones with fake ones in the accounts of people who granted you trust.  It would be up to them to cover their losses or let it "ripple".



133. Post 2589115 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on June 26, 2013, 10:16:14 PM
I didn't realize this was the ripple thread. Excuse me while I go look for the MtGox thread. Roll Eyes

We all treat this as the lounge thread.  If you want to talk about MtGox, bring up an interesting point.



134. Post 2591373 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: 420 on June 27, 2013, 04:48:04 AM

I'm bradley manning

I'm Madly Branning.



135. Post 2592378 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: wonkytonky on June 27, 2013, 08:33:08 AM
Something unusual on Gox, BTC is trading within a 20c band for the last couple of hours. Normally oscillates at least $1 or more.

A compressed price range often leads to a breakout.

which side ? Smiley   thats the question

anyone starting the up or down .. is having a pretty good slippage.. no big guys needed.. just a few buys or sells of 500 could start it

No big guys... just $50k.



136. Post 2601348 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: tpantlik on June 28, 2013, 06:59:55 AM
Gox going down?

http://i.imgur.com/a2SW8ZH.png

well_that_escalated_quickly.png

Just little wiggles, chill out.




137. Post 2636864 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on July 02, 2013, 04:42:53 PM
Disclaimer: I know nothing about EFTs and TLDR the Winklevii document.

I wonder what the tax implications of the Winklevii moving their BTC into this EFT trust are. They would not need to pay any capital gains tax, since they've not realised their profits. But what about the shares they are selling?

There is no tax implication for them or their corp.  the corp does not pay taxes when issuing shares.  That money goes to the corp (not to you directly).  If they then pay themselves a salary from that money, then they'd pay taxes on it.

I guess the difference is that if they just sold the BTC, they would pay taxes on any realized gains.  So, actually, I guess this is the perfect way of selling BTC at a profit without paying taxes.   The money is technically in the corp, but they can still buy themselves pretty things with it.

What it does is make the Bitcoins into an ETF.  There are well established rules for ETFs for taxes and accounting, so it hides the fact that your investment is in Bitcoins making the accounting easy, its just another ETF in your list of ETF investments.

Whether it is wise to do so is an entirely separate question.  

Also, the ETFs are the #1 mechanism that the leviathans use to manipulate currencies (such as gold).  So the existence of an increasing number of ETFs that can move the market however a central bank desires it to move creates additional issues.

The reason there are Gold, Oil, Industry, and Country ETFs is that actually buying a brick of gold, or a barrel of Oil is a huge pain.   This is not the case for Bitcoins.  Any idiot can overnight a check to CampBx and buy Bitcoins.  ...and you don't need to declare anything.  If Bitcoins go up in value and you sell them, it is up to you if you want to declare that income (the IRS has not said it's taxable yet) - with an ETF, you WILL have to pay taxes, definitely.

The IRS says every profitable transaction is taxable: http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc420.html



138. Post 2692027 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: barbs on July 09, 2013, 06:38:19 PM
holy shit 8k wall

meh



139. Post 2692146 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: barbs on July 09, 2013, 06:47:41 PM
this is absolutely insane what i'm watching here

he just swallowed 750 coins and now put up the 8k wall again at 76

edit: it's almost like he's taunting that 80 wall showing he can eat it

https://www.tradingview.com/v/tXCSB4CR/



140. Post 2703005 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):




Goodbye asks



141. Post 2708765 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Richy_T on July 11, 2013, 07:52:08 PM
Or milk,


You know where milk comes from, right? You know what those animals are fed, right? You know how much oil is used to support the growth of those crops, right? Then you know how all that stuff is moved around, right?

Dollars?



142. Post 2709273 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: chairforce1 on July 11, 2013, 08:49:07 PM


Thanks for taking the advice posted elsewhere in the thread ChartBuddy. I think this looks much better.

I think something broke. It isn't posting automatically. Not sure why.

never seen chartbuddy talk, but im also a noob

ChartBuddy is a robot, but his handler is around.



143. Post 2709620 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: seleme on July 11, 2013, 10:12:15 PM
Screw the fancy economy talk, where the heck we're going now?  Grin

To the right.... always to the right.



144. Post 2710030 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: zemario on July 11, 2013, 11:29:13 PM
Mmmm.... The market appears to be distilling quite well.

Could this be the bottom? It's looking good, not many would expect the bounce here, but it does appear that people is regaining trust.

It would take a bull with some balls.  Or at least enough balls to take us up a couple more dollars and trigger the daily goomboos.



145. Post 2710574 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: MickeyT2008 on July 12, 2013, 01:24:28 AM
upupupupup!
Yay!  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Is it time for the gifs of bulls and rockets yet?




146. Post 2711668 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: hlynur on July 12, 2013, 05:22:37 AM
That's some pretty heavy dumping going on... $96 bid wall didn't last long.

jup 12k dump and europe waking up

12k? lol.... where did you get this number?

during last 30min 12k or am i reading it wrong Tongue
http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg2zig30-minztgSzbgBzm1g100zm2g25zi1gMFIzi2gRSIzvzps

Yes, there was 12k volume in the last 30 minutes, but it was in no way a 12k "dump".  Most of the volume occurred on the upswing.  Just because the candle temporarily falls below the open doesn't mean the entire candle's volume was a dump.



147. Post 2711716 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Nemesis on July 12, 2013, 05:30:46 AM
Such an epic bull trap.  Grin

uhhh.... you mean bear trap?

I dont think you know what a trap means.


He thinks it's still a bear market and this rally is a trap.



148. Post 2715955 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: cmp on July 12, 2013, 05:12:30 PM
Good thing there's so many bears here, or else we wouldn't enough panic buyers for later. Permabull season has only just begun.

There's so much positive news right now.

http://thegenesisblock.com/mt-gox-withdrawal-freeze-driving-significant-liquidity-concerns/

I notice they don't mention that the withdrawal freeze is over and has been for 7 days before they published the article.



149. Post 2716223 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: chodpaba on July 12, 2013, 05:23:58 PM
A few tips: http://youtu.be/ilzEmTii_vw

lol



150. Post 2716236 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Abandon on July 12, 2013, 05:30:52 PM
Good thing there's so many bears here, or else we wouldn't enough panic buyers for later. Permabull season has only just begun.

There's so much positive news right now.

http://thegenesisblock.com/mt-gox-withdrawal-freeze-driving-significant-liquidity-concerns/

I notice they don't mention that the withdrawal freeze is over and has been for 7 days before they published the article.


"Upon the completion of the two weeks, the company announced the end of the hiatus, though a significant back-log of withdrawals would mean at least another two weeks of delays."

You caught me.  I didn't read it carefully because old news is old.



151. Post 2716454 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: molecular on July 12, 2013, 06:20:53 PM

seems rather low to me


Indeed.  Derpinheimer, can you please tell me where I can trade my USD for any other currency besides bitcoin and pay just 1%?  And don't tell me forex, I want to actually take possession.



152. Post 2716711 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Richy_T on July 12, 2013, 07:06:48 PM


Why did the automated posts got so small? I have this new huge monitor for nothing? LOL

click on it.  It saves us some room to read other things.

It had to be shrunk because the people who read this thread have beady eyes.

I liked it bigger, but I understand how much people whine.  At the very least though you should make it slightly bigger.  There is no need for it to be smaller than the minimum post size.



153. Post 2716716 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on July 12, 2013, 07:08:52 PM

Nice, a bit like bitcoin.de before they got a bank.
You will still need to wait 3-4 days to get your coins (transfer needs to clear).

No.  You used to have to wait 3-4 days.  Now it is actually instant.



154. Post 2717191 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: molecular on July 12, 2013, 08:18:41 PM
BTC lending rate on bitfinex is 80% (annual basis). Never seen it above 5% before.

Interesting. Did people just discover they can short on bitfinex?



I don't know, but based on total USD borrowed/total BTC borrowed, leveraged traders need the market to fall to $81 to even out their positions.  Continued upwards movement will cause a short squeeze.



155. Post 2717380 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Abandon on July 12, 2013, 08:42:18 PM
I appear to have measured the wave's length wrong, and the support breached, so I don't really know what will happen now.
https://www.tradingview.com/x/j6KHvNMt/

That chart conveys my feelings perfectly.



156. Post 2718132 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Chalkbot on July 12, 2013, 10:52:33 PM
it happened to me once, haven't slept during a crash.. went from one mistake to other after nice initial gain.

The worst is when you sit up all night as long as you can waiting for something that doesn't come ... I hate it when that happens ! Feel like crap the next day, and the action normally happens then lol

I really hate trading sometimes ... in fact a lot of the time. Win or lose, it's pretty soulless and a big distraction from 'real life'

I've never lost any BTC holdin like a mofo. You guys should try it, way lower stress.

+21,000,000



157. Post 2718236 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: MAbtc on July 12, 2013, 11:09:46 PM
it happened to me once, haven't slept during a crash.. went from one mistake to other after nice initial gain.

The worst is when you sit up all night as long as you can waiting for something that doesn't come ... I hate it when that happens ! Feel like crap the next day, and the action normally happens then lol

I really hate trading sometimes ... in fact a lot of the time. Win or lose, it's pretty soulless and a big distraction from 'real life'

I've never lost any BTC holdin like a mofo. You guys should try it, way lower stress.
That sounds extremely stressful. No thanks. I'll buy and hold when we start running up a new bubble.

facepalm..... buy when we start a new bubble.....


That's when you should start to think about selling a few every X%.



158. Post 2718948 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on July 12, 2013, 11:59:42 PM
Anyone else buying when 94 gets broken?

your better off buying now there's no question 94 will be broken


anyone else selling once 180 is reached Cool

I'll sell a few at $180.



159. Post 2719035 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 13, 2013, 02:29:18 AM
why the heck are all big movements happening when I'm heading to bed or already sleeping  Shocked Cheesy
1) Conspiracy

It's this one.  I watch you seleme.



160. Post 2719155 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on July 13, 2013, 02:59:03 AM
this is bull shit i demand someone dumb on cavirtex now  Angry

r i dum enuf?



161. Post 2724884 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: marvinrouge on July 13, 2013, 11:59:21 PM
I hoped more value is in my charts  Cheesy

But seriously, if I were bullish (and missed all previous calls) I would place a BUY order between 91.03 and 89.68 and hoped that Mrs Market (there is no guarantee this will happen because Mrs market is getting more and more horny) will take me for a ride in a few hours.


There is a chance to have the buy order unfilled (and goodbye the wild ride  Cheesy)
What make you so sure there will be a drop to 90 ? If Mrs Market is bullish, can't she go straight up ?

Sure she can, but it is not wise to but with a market order in a rising market unless you have already accumulated quite a bit and have enough fiat left to trigger panic buying.



162. Post 2724932 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Abandon on July 14, 2013, 12:18:00 AM
Anyone notice that there is almost never a trend reversal off of whole numbers? With a few exceptions, such as when the wall is too big and the rally is exhausted. (Less likely to bounce on the small scale)

Um.... $2?  That seems like an important one.



163. Post 2732037 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: whitenight639 on July 15, 2013, 12:57:32 AM
93.00 - cheap. I would buy.

http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/economic-calendar/


The US Treasury bonds are redeemed tomorrow, tell me what you guys think will happen to the dollar and btc / usd price if the yeild / interest rate goes up on treasuries ?


I'll tell you what, the USD will fall and the price of Btc will be higher. Might not be much but should be significant.


BUY BUY BUY

Rising rates is bullish for the dollar and bearish for risk assets.



164. Post 2732544 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: wonkytonky on July 15, 2013, 06:10:42 AM
A lot of us are out mostly in fiat waiting on the sidelines for the price to drop, so we can get more cheap coins. So the question is, why isn't dropping?

Because:

A lot of us are out mostly in fiat waiting on the sidelines for the price to drop, so we can get more cheap coins.

lol are we stuck in a paradox Smiley ?

No, we will escape when they lose patience and start to buy in.



165. Post 2736341 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: tutkarz on July 15, 2013, 08:40:32 AM
No, we will escape when they lose patience and start to buy in.

You forgot the other option, which is holders get scared and start to sell out.

scared of what? Long term investment is bullish still, there is no reason to be scared.

Yep.  Most of the newbies have been spooked out already, and this ain't shit for us old hats.



166. Post 2736364 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on July 15, 2013, 06:18:51 PM

What the heck, look at these examples given:

Bear toss

noun: a new market term that describes an argument or action that directly affects the market price positively.

A successful bear toss this morning by a new ASIC developer brought bitcoin's market price up 20%.

Before leaving Wikileaks, Julian Assange made a failed attempt at a bear toss by claiming that the US government was supporting bitcoin.


I don't get the term "bear toss" though, as it should be "bull toss" but perhaps they missed...

Because the bears are trying to make a profit, but this guy tosses them out of the fucking park:



167. Post 2737034 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: seleme on July 15, 2013, 08:30:59 PM
I just wish it would slip down to 90 for me to rebuy and never care about btc/usd again. I didn't care for longtime and did quite well, then I visited this crap of a thread  Grin

You and everyone else who sold when everyone was high on bear farts a week ago.



168. Post 2737871 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Loozik on July 15, 2013, 10:51:05 PM
For me too, thanks.

Please explain. Truth hurts or what? I am puzzled  Smiley

I think he's asking for drugs.



169. Post 2737893 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Loozik on July 15, 2013, 10:54:43 PM
For me too, thanks.

Please explain. Truth hurts or what? I am puzzled  Smiley

I think he's asking for drugs.

Care to explain?

It looks pretty self explanatory to me:
Quote from: gandhibt on July 15, 2013, 10:48:36 PM

LOL, you should pass some of that shit you are smoking Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

+420

For me too, thanks.



170. Post 2737927 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Loozik on July 15, 2013, 10:59:51 PM
For me too, thanks.

Please explain. Truth hurts or what? I am puzzled  Smiley

I think he's asking for drugs.

Care to explain?

It looks pretty self explanatory to me:

LOL, you should pass some of that shit you are smoking Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

+420

For me too, thanks.

Not really  Cool

Then I can't help you.



171. Post 2738000 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Loozik on July 15, 2013, 11:15:48 PM
Let's be friends. PM me or something.

You're not as important as you think.  You are just another noisemaker.... just what these forums need Roll Eyes



172. Post 2738708 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 16, 2013, 02:15:03 AM
We dropped to 65 and then right back where we started at 100+.  Did ANY money leave Gox AT ALL?  Or was this all just long-term bull traders trying to outfox each other?

Did any of those coins left MtGox?

Impossible to say, but the bitcoin on the order book has certainly been decreasing lately:



173. Post 2743199 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on July 16, 2013, 07:00:02 PM
Bitcoin is currently inflating at a 12.5% yearly rate

I'm not sure where you got that figure.

Basic math.

This year (2013) aprox. BTC1,312,500 will be minted, those are being added to the BTC10,500,000 minted until the end of 2012, so at the end of the year you will have around BTC11,812,500

That's a yearly inflation of 12.5%

In 2014 it should be around 11%, in the following years it will decrease until aprox. 9% (2016) until it falls to 4% in 2017 because of the next reward halving.

Yes, surprise, Bitcoin the deflationary currency its in a heavily inflationary phase and it will be for the next decade. Good thing is that the inflation is predictable and immune to third party manipulation.

Gotcha. What you referred to as inflation, I see as increase in supply.

I tend to think of inflation as a function of value, as in how much of a currency is required to buy something.

With fiat currencies, inflation is usually measured by indices covering everything from wages to fuel prices. It takes more USD each year to buy a gallon of gas or hire a laborer for an hour.  Bitcoin is referred to as deflationary because it takes fewer and fewer coins each year to buy something, be it an ASIC miner, an American dollar or a pound of herbs.

You are talking about price inflation.

Rampion is talking about monetary inflation.

Both are correct uses of the term, and both talked about regarding fiat currencies.

Also, wages have not been keeping pace with food and energy price inflation, so it's hard to back up the claim that the price of labor is inflating.



174. Post 2743361 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: chufchuf on July 16, 2013, 07:20:42 PM

Price isn't driven by miners, but by traders and commodity speculation as has been amply demonstrated elsewhere.


This.

It's obvious that price is not driven by difficulty, but inflation does have an impact on price - at this stage inflation in BTC its non negligible, and its in fact built into the system to pay for the work and costs of mining during the early days of Bitcoin. Thus, looking at growing difficulty and expecting growing price is a fallacy (in fact its the other way around) - but nevertheless Bitcoin is currently inflating at a 12.5% yearly rate, and what miners do with those newly minted coints has inevitably an impact on price.

I believe that there will be lots of newly minted coins hitting the exchanges in late 2013, will just wait and see.

EDIT: in fewer words, wether miners decide to speculate (holding) or to pay for their fiat costs (selling the coins for good) has inevitably an immediate impact on price.

this is like concentrating on only one of your girlfriends butt cheaks, you know very well what the counter argument is.

Inflation rate of 12.5%, how is that even a point?

That's the fifth year in Bitcoin Survival= even if we assume linear and not exponential spread in bitcoin awareness, that's 20% more people using and storing value in BTC.

-7.5%

I love this bears latching onto a miners value case- they attribute psychological values wherever they please... when the price rose it was because everyone wanted to buy btc to buy asicminers, but asicminer wasn't selling his btc, even though 'asicminer is running it as a business' like they like to say whenever it suits them. suddenly asicminer and all the miners want to sell all their coins and only if the price dips, which is when they panic and drive the price further.

What about last year, when inflation rate was 25%, how come the price went up 1000%... and the year before when it was 40%, why did it go up 1000%? frankly if miners drive price I'm surprised it isn't at -0.1 cent

He didn't say difficulty drives price, he said it has a non negligible influence.  Your numbers seem to support that.  That said, I agree that counting on miners to sell out is a horrible assumption.



175. Post 2743696 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on July 16, 2013, 08:21:14 PM
wages have not been keeping pace with food and energy price inflation, so it's hard to back up the claim that the price of labor is inflating.

LOL I guess that depends where you live. While minimum wage here inflates more slowly than a gallon of gas, it does still inflate. 20 years ago a cleaning lady cost $10/hr. 10 years ago it was up to $15. Now I pay mine $20 or she'll go sling beer at the local and make more in tips. Even that's not enough to compete for her cleaning services with the rich guys at the yacht club during the summer.

As for that pound of herbs, the price has actually fallen in recent years.  Wink

So, exactly like I said.... it is not keeping pace with food and energy price inflation.



176. Post 2743740 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: bitcodo on July 16, 2013, 08:31:48 PM
He must be one of the happy one.

Cheesy



177. Post 2743774 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Richy_T on July 16, 2013, 08:39:19 PM
what miners do with those newly minted coints has inevitably an impact on price.

What they are doing with those coins should be fairly easy to analyse. I believe there is a site out there that shows how long coins are stagnant for.

Shhh.... we don't like facts and data here.



178. Post 2744068 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: vokain on July 16, 2013, 09:33:26 PM

problem is, allot of those miners won't get ROI for many months. Knowing this, I would expect most (except for those who took out loans) to choose to wait for higher prices before getting their fiat back.

Exactly, I dont see why on this forums people seem to think that miners want to get ROI as soon as possible. I think 90% of them will just mine and hoard, for years

Most of GPU miners didn't want ROI as soon as possible, as I explained earlier - they counted on reselling their GPUs, and they were mostly hobbyist. But I'm a miner myself, I know a lot of miners, I've seen in first person who are the customers of companies like KnC and how much they are spending, and you have to understand that this last media bubble exposed Bitcoin to a lot of new and uneducated people who run profit calculators at current difficulty (without having their miners yet), they do not even understand that difficulty is growing exponentially, and at the end of the day there is a "gold rush" in which a lot of new people is entering mining because they think they will get rich quick... So we have now a) a lot of individuals investing money they cannot afford to lose on BTC miners, and as you surely know there is a "get-rich-quick" feeling on BTC - they think they will recoup their investment FAST, and this is why they are putting in this game more money they should; b) there are more and more "professional" miners that are investing money in mining with the only intention of generating profit - they will run their operations as a business. That people has to pay for huge electricity costs, renting of industrial places where they will host their operations, etc. etc. etc. A lot of fiat expenses to cover.

During the GPU era, I rarely saw a) and b) miners, most were small-time hobbyist, running their rigs in their bedrooms. During this change to ASIC, I'm seeing a lot of both a) and b). This people needs to recoup fiat ASAP.

I can't imagine too much of an influx of people that don't understand mining economics that spend money on anything more than a jalepeno

+1

The big guys know what they are doing or are at least seeking the advisement of someone who does.



179. Post 2745149 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Loozik on July 17, 2013, 01:05:00 AM

Well tried, but no.


two whales with opposing interests ?

Can there be so many whales in a small market like this?

two whales is not so many



180. Post 2745173 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: vokain on July 17, 2013, 01:10:24 AM
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Man_The_Harpoons

No matter which whale wins, there will be a feast.



181. Post 2750158 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 17, 2013, 05:48:15 PM
Having money at MtGox I'm as worried as much as the last time this came up, not at all.

Finally, someone with some sense.  It seems like this has become the "MtGox Speculation" forum lately.  So many chickens without heads running around.



182. Post 2750427 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on July 17, 2013, 07:50:03 PM
Having money at MtGox I'm as worried as much as the last time this came up, not at all.

Finally, someone with some sense.  It seems like this has become the "MtGox Speculation" forum lately.  So many chickens without heads running around.

Are you surprised people are worried?  Bitcoin services don't have a fantastic track record of being "safe and sound", and Gox is bullshitting their customers.  For me, it would be much nicer to have an official statement in which they come clean (for example saying: we can hardly process any payments right now, and we don't know when the business deals or infrastructure to provide payments will come back online.  But to prove we don't have liquidity/solvency issues, we will undergo an audit).

I really don't mind if the majority of my money can't be withdrawn to a bank any time soon, it's there for longterm investment/trading anyway.
But a company that in all likelyhood lies to customers in order to manage perceptions, that doesn't sit right with me..

I'm not going to get into this in another thread.  Their press releases explain the situation clearly.



183. Post 2751177 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: chodpaba on July 17, 2013, 10:08:54 PM
Even if we stipulate that the apologists are right and Gox is dealing with a minor banking problem, can anyone argue that they have acted professionally and been forthcoming in their communication with customers?

I hope they get their shit together because to many casual users, they ARE Bitcoin. Anyway, the next couple of weeks will be telling, as otherwise patient people will soon start to doubt the safety of their funds.

You have to understand Pale Phoenix, that we have been through much worse and are fairly desensitized to Gox's bullshit.

+1

So much for my hopes of talking about something BESIDES MtGox withdrawals today.



184. Post 2752216 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Rampion on July 18, 2013, 01:37:01 AM
So, how are we going to refer to the ensuing price drop?

SatoshiDiceddon?

I really invite you check the SatoshiDice statistical analysis thread, you will see how incredible were the profits during the bubble inflation, people gambled like there was no tomorrow. Tens of k's of BTC profit per month.

If this buyout is true is probably the biggest investment ever in the Bitcoin economy, and its not pure speculation. Its big big news, guys.

ASICMiner is trading at a market cap of 172k BTC



185. Post 2752621 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on July 18, 2013, 03:17:04 AM
Yup, if anyone had any confidence in what they were posting they would be swinging their dicks and front-running the shit out of it



+1



186. Post 2752713 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Abandon on July 18, 2013, 03:41:30 AM
Anyone know if this wave count adds up?


I'm no EW expert, but that doesn't look right to me.  I think the entire trend is supposed to be in the same direction as the initial impulse, but I could be wrong.



187. Post 2753246 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 18, 2013, 06:11:06 AM
Wow... I would NOT trust a bot with 1000+ BTC.

Especially if it relies on MtGox connection.

Even if someone would, I doubt they would trust it to sell that much at once without human input.



188. Post 2753279 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on July 18, 2013, 06:18:44 AM
Yeah, I find the bot theory really hard to believe....although I'd admit 1600 BTC is not a "sky is falling" moment.  Doesn't mean its not coming though.

I do to, and I run a bot.



189. Post 2753901 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 18, 2013, 08:41:31 AM
Would it be better if I stopped? Last time I took a break we plunged to 65. Cheesy

Don't stop magical bear.  Hold up the price with your bear might.



190. Post 2757621 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: auto2nr1 on July 18, 2013, 07:59:21 PM
I am having problems logging into Mt. Gox.

503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Is anyone else getting this?

I get that occasionally on login.  f5 usually does the trick.



191. Post 2757712 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 18, 2013, 08:18:40 PM
How was I wrong? Here's my first post that I made on this matter when the price was in the 130s: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=188829.msg1957530#msg1957530

Like it or not, the bear is on.

PS: Goodbye, triple digits.

Completely delusional.

Hey, he was right back when we were in an obvious bull trap.  It's clinging to that victory that is holding him back now.



192. Post 2757722 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Wagner2014 on July 18, 2013, 08:21:13 PM
we are still in a downturn, deflating the massive bubble that began to burst in April...the run up was from around $13 in January 2013...we are now in a down trend with lower lows and lower highs...that pattern continues...once the pattern changes, it changes...what are ppl arguing about?

http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/chart.png?width=939.76666&m=mtgoxUSD&SubmitButton=Draw&r=90&i=&c=1&s=2013-04-23&e=2013-07-19&Prev=&Next=&t=S&b=&a1=&m1=10&a2=&m2=25&x=0&i1=&i2=&i3=&i4=&v=1&cv=0&ps=0&l=0&p=0&

They are arguing about whether the pattern will continue or if it is beginning to change.



193. Post 2757764 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 18, 2013, 08:25:47 PM
Twice that idiot said no more triple digits in 2013 and both times we had triple digits a few days later.
That's not wrong, that's prematurely right. Cheesy

Time will tell.



194. Post 2760260 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: bitrocket on July 19, 2013, 06:27:21 AM


can somebody explain this graph please? i mean it looks nice in 3d but what does it show


It shows ask/bid depth over the last hour, with the latest time at the front of the chart and an hour ago at the back.  It looks more interesting when the market moves.  It clearly shows any bid/ask walls.  If you click on it then your browser will open another tab with it in full size.

Thanks MickeyT2008. What do the gaps indicate between the bids and asks? Sometimes the green and red lines meet in the middle and sometimes there's a gap

That is the spread between the highest bid and the lowest ask.



195. Post 2763780 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Jozzaboy on July 19, 2013, 07:09:53 PM
We just recovered 5 dollars and no activity here? Seriously?

Bears aren't dancing anymore....

Bulls aren't ready to declare victory, bears are shitting themselves.



196. Post 2764893 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: giszmo on July 19, 2013, 10:11:48 PM
It's strange to hear bitlisten to tinkling away without seeing a single dollar amount on any bubble.

uhm you mean the one with the troyan loader? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=256430

No, he means the one that was put up by the original creator after listentobitcoin was sold to some jackass who did the trojan.

bitlisten.com is still legit
listentobitcoin.com is trojan city



197. Post 2792404 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 24, 2013, 04:32:18 AM
They've been doing their best to contribute to a FUD environment and stunt Bitcoin's growth by scaring off investors for a while now. Not that I'm surprised given the deflating bubble.

It gives them time to get their software and processes in order.



198. Post 2792560 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: MikeH on July 24, 2013, 04:50:32 AM

(@ 2:20)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJtOhfpGlZ8


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJtOhfpGlZ8&feature=player_detailpage&t=140



199. Post 2799764 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Kazu on July 25, 2013, 06:49:54 AM

First it's important to note that Ripple is not a currency, it's a global payment network that costs virtually nothing to use. Within this payment network you can use any currency you choose.  USD, EUR, YEN, BTC, LTC, PPC or any other currency there is liquidity for.  I say this because it's important to know what you're investing in.  It's not Bitcoin.  It's a true protocol like http, not a single crypto currency.


Is Ripple actually gaining any traction as a payment network?

I've yet to see a single business accepting XRP or payment through Ripple network, or hear about any major/regular transaction going through it..

Are there any stats about this out there?
No, there is no liquidity besides Bitstamp, basically. No vendors accept XRP for payment. It's basically speculation for XRP only, and it's highly illiquid. XRP is highly prone to manipulation, much more so than BTC. A single entity can easily dump the value of XRP to oblivion. Indeed, a single entity dropped something like 6 million XRP onto the ask book (9-10 XRP above spot, mind you), and that alone has caused the value to plummet from mid-70s, now to the 180s.

It's too bad Ripple is tied to Open Coin. As a payment system, it's pretty brilliant and has a lot of potential to be extremely versatile for payments/micropayments. But the supply of XRP is completely fucked, fuck holding it. At the same time, since Ripple has virtually no liquidity, there is really nothing to be done but trade in and out of XRP.

Can somebody actually explain what XRP is other than another centralized e-currency like Liberty Reserve?

Ripple is a p2p lending network where payments and defaults "ripple" through a chain of trust.  It will be repeatedly abused by scammers until it is abandoned except as possibly an inter-exchange lending network.

XRP is how you pay transaction fees on the Ripple network.



200. Post 2804856 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: molecular on July 25, 2013, 10:28:29 PM
inspired by adams chartbuddy conglomeration post, I just made a chartbuddy video starting mid-may.

http://youtu.be/ifKS-UebUCI

for some reason the quality currently sucks really bad (doesn't on my end). maybe it'll get better once the youtube re-encoder has finished his duties for higher qualities or something.



Awesome.  If only you could align the prices between charts it would be even better.  But I imagine that would be a pain.



201. Post 2804881 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: muyuu on July 25, 2013, 10:40:07 PM
Higher resolution would help too. Prices are blurry.

Quote from: molecular on July 25, 2013, 10:28:29 PM
for some reason the quality currently sucks really bad (doesn't on my end). maybe it'll get better once the youtube re-encoder has finished his duties for higher qualities or something



202. Post 2821975 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: vokain on July 28, 2013, 08:04:15 PM
by the way, so I was at Bonnaroo in June, the music & arts festival, just trying to have a good time while hopefully learning a bit more about myself. there was this Hare Krishna disciple that came by our tent and wanted to share his insights. How in tune he is with the natural rhythms.. you could just feel it from him, it was really weird! Any way, he simply piqued my interest with his spirit, enough to warrant further sincere investigation. He then gave me four books written by A.C. Bhaktivedanta (for free! but I gave him $23 so I could help him keep going) and I've since then have stumbled down this path this summer. Right now I'm reading The Science of Self-Realization, and it is quite humbling to see that this sort of insight can result in such harmony with how medicine and science has explained things. The book is just a series of different, yet very explanatory interviews with A.C. Bhaktivedanta. Worth reading a couple of interviews at least, it's free here:
http://prabhupadabooks.com/ssr


"The Personality of Godhead may not be present before one's eyes, but if one is sincere in wanting such guidance the Lord will send a bona fide person who can guide one properly back home, back to Godhead."

+1 for Bonnaroo
+1 for the Vedic Teachings
+1 for the story of Krishna

All that said, I grew up in the same county as Prabhupada's Temple of Gold in West Virginia.  I could say a lot, but I will leave it at this: While Prabhupada has done a fantastic job inspiring thousands, I always take his translations and interpretations with a large dose of salt because I know what kind of malice took place under his watch.  If you want more details, check out this book: http://www.amazon.com/Monkey-Stick-Onyx-Hubner/dp/0451401875

P.S.  For the no nonsense "heart" of Vedic teaching, find a good translation of the Yoga Sutras.



203. Post 2822018 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: vokain on July 28, 2013, 09:49:16 PM
by the way, so I was at Bonnaroo in June, the music & arts festival, just trying to have a good time while hopefully learning a bit more about myself. there was this Hare Krishna disciple that came by our tent and wanted to share his insights. How in tune he is with the natural rhythms.. you could just feel it from him, it was really weird! Any way, he simply piqued my interest with his spirit, enough to warrant further sincere investigation. He then gave me four books written by A.C. Bhaktivedanta (for free! but I gave him $23 so I could help him keep going) and I've since then have stumbled down this path this summer. Right now I'm reading The Science of Self-Realization, and it is quite humbling to see that this sort of insight can result in such harmony with how medicine and science has explained things. The book is just a series of different, yet very explanatory interviews with A.C. Bhaktivedanta. Worth reading a couple of interviews at least, it's free here:
http://prabhupadabooks.com/ssr


"The Personality of Godhead may not be present before one's eyes, but if one is sincere in wanting such guidance the Lord will send a bona fide person who can guide one properly back home, back to Godhead."

+1 for Bonnaroo
+1 for the Vedic Teachings
+1 for the story of Krishna

All that said, I grew up in the same county as Prabhupada's Temple of Gold in West Virginia.  I could say a lot, but I will leave it at this: While Prabhupada has done a fantastic job inspiring thousands, I always take his translations and interpretations with a large dose of salt because I know what kind of malice took place under his watch.  If you want more details, check out this book: http://www.amazon.com/Monkey-Stick-Onyx-Hubner/dp/0451401875

yeah, apparently one of my pledge brothers' moms had a friend whose kid was taken by Krishnas..... scary! but thanks for sharing this friend. I love the krishna philosophy and try to imbibe as much as possible, but....I can't take it on fully. maybe i can, but I'm afraid to haha

Much of the Bhagavad-gita is just Krisna reciting portions of the Yoga Sutras.  This is a good place to start: http://swamij.com/index-yoga-meditation-yoga-sutras.htm  However, it might be worth some time in a book store to find a translation that speaks to you.  Or better yet, you could learn Sanskrit if you have LOTS of extra time Wink.



204. Post 2822126 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: vokain on July 28, 2013, 10:05:17 PM
by the way, so I was at Bonnaroo in June, the music & arts festival, just trying to have a good time while hopefully learning a bit more about myself. there was this Hare Krishna disciple that came by our tent and wanted to share his insights. How in tune he is with the natural rhythms.. you could just feel it from him, it was really weird! Any way, he simply piqued my interest with his spirit, enough to warrant further sincere investigation. He then gave me four books written by A.C. Bhaktivedanta (for free! but I gave him $23 so I could help him keep going) and I've since then have stumbled down this path this summer. Right now I'm reading The Science of Self-Realization, and it is quite humbling to see that this sort of insight can result in such harmony with how medicine and science has explained things. The book is just a series of different, yet very explanatory interviews with A.C. Bhaktivedanta. Worth reading a couple of interviews at least, it's free here:
http://prabhupadabooks.com/ssr


"The Personality of Godhead may not be present before one's eyes, but if one is sincere in wanting such guidance the Lord will send a bona fide person who can guide one properly back home, back to Godhead."

+1 for Bonnaroo
+1 for the Vedic Teachings
+1 for the story of Krishna

All that said, I grew up in the same county as Prabhupada's Temple of Gold in West Virginia.  I could say a lot, but I will leave it at this: While Prabhupada has done a fantastic job inspiring thousands, I always take his translations and interpretations with a large dose of salt because I know what kind of malice took place under his watch.  If you want more details, check out this book: http://www.amazon.com/Monkey-Stick-Onyx-Hubner/dp/0451401875

yeah, apparently one of my pledge brothers' moms had a friend whose kid was taken by Krishnas..... scary! but thanks for sharing this friend. I love the krishna philosophy and try to imbibe as much as possible, but....I can't take it on fully. maybe i can, but I'm afraid to haha

Much of the Bhagavad-gita is just Krisna reciting portions of the Yoga Sutras.  This is a good place to start: http://swamij.com/index-yoga-meditation-yoga-sutras.htm  However, it might be worth some time in a book store to find a translation that speaks to you.  Or better yet, you could learn Sanskrit if you have LOTS of extra time Wink.

Thanks for enlightening me some more. I love this rabbit hole Smiley Is Sanskrit particularly hard? My plan when I get my B.S. and minors is to hopefully buy a nice semi-isolated property somewhere where I can invest lots of time into studying things I want to study and starting the pile of to-read books I've steadily built up, before going out to pursue graduate studies.

Sanskrit is its own rabbit hole.  Make sure you get some audio to help you and don't just make up your own pronunciations.  There is actually a mapping of the basic syllables to regions of the human body that is helpful.  Dr. David Frawley's book "Mantra Yoga and Primal Sound" is a good place to start.  However, I fear we are vastly off topic.....



For those of you still in denial, the correct count is as follows:
We are now starting wave 2 of 3 of 3 off the $65 bottom.  After this slight correction, we will see wave 3 of 3 of 3 which should take us up to $104 or higher.



205. Post 2822186 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: MAbtc on July 28, 2013, 10:19:44 PM
For those of you still in denial, the correct count is as follows:
We are now starting wave 2 of 3 of 3 off the $65 bottom.  After this slight correction, we will see wave 3 of 3 of 3 which should take us up to $104 or higher.
I think we could see 120s - 130s. IMO that could be the top for a while. We'll see how this goes -- have not yet confirmed that this is not a triple top (in which case, resumption of downtrend could continue).

120-130 sounds decent to me too, but it could be weaker or stronger.  We'll just have to see how things play out.  I'm in no way convinced $65 is the hard bottom, but at least for the mid term it appears so.



206. Post 2823155 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: Ares on July 29, 2013, 02:17:15 AM
http://blockchained.com/depth_mtgox_15d.png

I always counter that chart with this one, but this time it seems to strengthen your point.



207. Post 2824707 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 29, 2013, 09:27:59 AM
No more double digits for July.

sell, sell, sell



208. Post 2824714 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 29, 2013, 09:35:05 AM
No more double digits for July.

sell, sell, sell
Then we will revert to no more triple digits for 2013. Cheesy

buy, buy, buy

(my market making bot thanks you)



209. Post 2824826 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: vokain on July 29, 2013, 10:02:20 AM
I would agree with u if the market wasn't so skewed from the withdrawal hiatus going on. People want to cash out, hence they are buying bitcoins in order to sell them at a loss. Only reason price is going up.

that doesn't explain other exchanges following.

Denial is not just a river in Egypt.



210. Post 2829903 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: chodpaba on July 30, 2013, 02:48:53 AM
I have received a rather large box addressed to "Mr.Bitcoin"  Grin

price will rise sharply soon!
How many business days is it now to 180? Grin

IDK, but just the speculation around what is in the mystery box addressed to "Mr.Bitcoin" should push us to 120!







211. Post 2835370 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: cedivad on July 30, 2013, 10:54:59 PM
Now the question will be:
What kind of rally can be triggered from an exchange that is paying maybe 10% of the withdraws?
Why do people keep having trust in it?

It turns out buying bitcoins makes it easier to withdrawal Tongue.



212. Post 2835405 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: thoughtfan on July 30, 2013, 11:09:34 PM
Is the withdrawal problem still not resolved at gox?
To answer this, I would simply look at the spread between MtGox and other exchanges (Bitstamp in particular), which has been around 8% the past few days, so most probably no, regardless of what people may say. Nothing is being arbitraged in any significance here.
Thanks Blitz.  I was guessing from the percentage differences (look at today's 9-11%+ on my earlier post) that there is significant delay making arbing impractical.  However, that is of lesser concern to me than the risk this may be an indication of gox potentially in big trouble.  What's word-on-the-street about that?

Some streets claim the sky is falling.  Some streets claim they will rape your cat.  Some streets claim they got withdrawals without issue and have provided screenshots to quell the mob.  Personally, I'm not worried.  But then again, I have no need to withdrawal fiat from Gox since all my trading on their platform is attempting to make btc profit.



213. Post 2835440 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: hlynur on July 30, 2013, 11:17:16 PM
You should probably let go, it's not good for ones health to be passive aggressive all the time. If you think it's not possible to profitably trade in the longer term (ie have an edge), I'm not sure why you're so drawn to speculation at all.

Noone's claimed he's a Cassandra. Trading is a game of probability combined with your profit/loss on each trade. Believe it or not, you can be wrong most of the time and still make money.

Did it occur to you you made ridiculous claims and were wrong 3 times in a row. How the hell is it possible you completely ignore this and just go on with your claims while its clear you know absolute shit all?
How does one do that? Don't you feel even a little bit stupid? Is there nothing inside you that says maybe i should stop acting like i know what Bitcoin will do because i don't? Don't you have any shame whatsoever?

i don't want to take side in whatever you two have going on.
but everytime Blitz is posting i expect a quote from you just because i got used to it.
the hero member status is by no means a badge for complete reliability, but it's good to see the perspective of people that are around this place for such a long time.
When I read through your post history with the ongoing fixation on Blitz and take the time in consideration you registered here... Undecided

after all this is a speculation thread so you don't have to take every word with a grain of salt.

ShroomsKit has been upset lately.  I hope whatever is bothering him gets better.



214. Post 2835473 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: Gatekeeper on July 30, 2013, 11:22:51 PM
I mentioned earlier it took 15 full days for my deposit to hit Gox, which made me shit myself as it was a large amount and i realised they could scam me or they could collapse at any time and i'd be totally screwed. But in their defence my bank did contact the Japanese bank to trace the funds and the reply i got back from my bank is that the funds had been credited to the account on the 25th, which was the day that Gox credited my account. So it may well be true that their bank is the one screwing them over, my banks said 3 business days to arrive but it took 11 business days for them to credit the account so I have no idea what is up with that, it's a corporate bank you'd think they could do better than 11 days.


And people wonder why bitcoin is valuable Roll Eyes.



215. Post 2835522 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on July 30, 2013, 11:30:01 PM
I mentioned earlier it took 15 full days for my deposit to hit Gox, which made me shit myself as it was a large amount and i realised they could scam me or they could collapse at any time and i'd be totally screwed. But in their defence my bank did contact the Japanese bank to trace the funds and the reply i got back from my bank is that the funds had been credited to the account on the 25th, which was the day that Gox credited my account. So it may well be true that their bank is the one screwing them over, my banks said 3 business days to arrive but it took 11 business days for them to credit the account so I have no idea what is up with that, it's a corporate bank you'd think they could do better than 11 days.


And people wonder why bitcoin is valuable Roll Eyes.

As long as the value is expressed as a USD figure it's doubt not wonder for me.

You can express the value how ever you want.  Just because most people use USD doesn't mean you have to.  There is nothing stopping you from measuring your BTC in bars of gold or rolls of toilet paper.



216. Post 2835528 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 30, 2013, 11:32:45 PM
You should probably let go, it's not good for ones health to be passive aggressive all the time. If you think it's not possible to profitably trade in the longer term (ie have an edge), I'm not sure why you're so drawn to speculation at all.

Noone's claimed he's a Cassandra. Trading is a game of probability combined with your profit/loss on each trade. Believe it or not, you can be wrong most of the time and still make money.

Did it occur to you you made ridiculous claims and were wrong 3 times in a row. How the hell is it possible you completely ignore this and just go on with your claims while its clear you know absolute shit all?
How does one do that? Don't you feel even a little bit stupid? Is there nothing inside you that says maybe i should stop acting like i know what Bitcoin will do because i don't? Don't you have any shame whatsoever?

i don't want to take side in whatever you two have going on.
but everytime Blitz is posting i expect a quote from you just because i got used to it.
the hero member status is by no means a badge for complete reliability, but it's good to see the perspective of people that are around this place for such a long time.
When I read through your post history with the ongoing fixation on Blitz and take the time in consideration you registered here... Undecided

after all this is a speculation thread so you don't have to take every word with a grain of salt.

He is a moderator. Which is crazy. He has no place on this forum as mod.

I've never seen you take issue with his moderation, but perhaps such encounters have happened out of the public eye.  You are always complaining about his posts, which are a separate activity from his moderation.



217. Post 2835537 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 30, 2013, 11:35:10 PM
You should probably let go, it's not good for ones health to be passive aggressive all the time. If you think it's not possible to profitably trade in the longer term (ie have an edge), I'm not sure why you're so drawn to speculation at all.

Noone's claimed he's a Cassandra. Trading is a game of probability combined with your profit/loss on each trade. Believe it or not, you can be wrong most of the time and still make money.

Did it occur to you you made ridiculous claims and were wrong 3 times in a row. How the hell is it possible you completely ignore this and just go on with your claims while its clear you know absolute shit all?
How does one do that? Don't you feel even a little bit stupid? Is there nothing inside you that says maybe i should stop acting like i know what Bitcoin will do because i don't? Don't you have any shame whatsoever?

i don't want to take side in whatever you two have going on.
but everytime Blitz is posting i expect a quote from you just because i got used to it.
the hero member status is by no means a badge for complete reliability, but it's good to see the perspective of people that are around this place for such a long time.
When I read through your post history with the ongoing fixation on Blitz and take the time in consideration you registered here... Undecided

after all this is a speculation thread so you don't have to take every word with a grain of salt.

ShroomsKit has been upset lately.  I hope whatever is bothering him gets better.

A moderator acting like a total clown is what's bothering me. It should bother you as well.

Well, according to you, people having beliefs they can't prove should bother me too.  But it doesn't.



218. Post 2835655 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on July 30, 2013, 11:59:59 PM
A moderator acting like a total clown is what's bothering me. It should bother you as well.
I don't have any issue with Blitz. He's a good moderator. Surely, his predictions were mostly wrong, but everyone has only 50% chance of guessing right.
My predictions were also mostly wrong even though I never told about them on forum.

Your attitude seems childish and too emotional to me. Your posts most of the time don't bring anything new into discussion, and usually are just filled with hate.
Not only towards speculation, but your recent posts about astrology also were mostly rage-based.

So my action: Ignore.

+ 1M
Shroomy, you've got a serious attitiude problem
Please do us all a  favour and take it somewhere else
And for your own sake and the sake of the rest of those you share this world with, please sort it out

Quote
True wisdom comes to each of us when we realize how little we understand about life, ourselves, and the world around us



219. Post 2835658 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on July 30, 2013, 11:44:52 PM
You want to try to kill bitcoin. Kill the cash flow.

Who is trying to kill bitcoin?



220. Post 2835668 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: humanitee on July 31, 2013, 12:04:09 AM
You want to try to kill bitcoin. Kill the cash flow.

Who is trying to kill bitcoin?

Blitz. Haven't you heard? That guy is pretty much Satan.

lol



221. Post 2835760 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 31, 2013, 12:23:16 AM
Don't worry, i'm outta this sub forum. No point in getting annoyed by some fud spreading idiot moderator. Waste of my time. Bye.

Good bye.  I hope you find peace.



222. Post 2835835 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on July 31, 2013, 12:42:28 AM
100% functional for me, and trades are going thru.

Cant believe there are only 79k asks.

Its kind of like when the bid/ask sum falls super low, its hard to imagine an end to the fall. But it always has to end. Cant wait to see what kind of showdown this will end with.

Yep, it's back now.  It was down for a few minutes.



223. Post 2835976 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: oda.krell on July 31, 2013, 01:21:43 AM
Drama. And not the bitcoin kind. I want to chime in as well.

I agree with shroomskit to a (very small) degree, Blitz can be a pain in the ass, especially during downtrends. Right now, he's all reasonable ("we all make wrong predictions, what's the big deal"), but when price is going down, there's a lot of self-righteous gloating that rubs me the wrong way too.

That said, that's no excuse for the shitty attitude of shroomskit.

Well, in a bearish mindset, Elliot Wave says he would have been in Wave 5 at $65.  We all are afflicted by the wave psychology, but being aware of it is key to seeing both sides.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliott_wave_principle#Elliott_Wave_personality_and_characteristics

(Edited for bearish mindset)
Quote
Wave 5: Wave five is the final leg in the direction of the dominant trend. The news is almost universally positive negative and everyone is bullish bearish. Unfortunately, this is when many average investors finally buy in sell out, right before the top bottom. Volume is often lower in wave five than in wave three, and many momentum indicators start to show divergences (prices reach a new high low but the indicators do not reach a new peak valley). At the end of a major bull bear market, bears bulls may very well be ridiculed (recall how forecasts for a top in the stock market during 2000 were received).



224. Post 2838414 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

108 = 2^2 * 3^3 = 2*2*3*3*3 = 4*27 = 12*9 = btcusd



225. Post 2838523 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: PurpleTentacle on July 31, 2013, 11:18:03 AM
108 = 2^2 * 3^3 = 2*2*3*3*3 = 4*27 = 12*9 = btcusd

Lol, 108 = 4 + 8 + 15 + 16 + 23 + 42

indeed



226. Post 2839524 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: micalith on July 31, 2013, 02:15:39 PM
It was 'low volume' until these big buys started increasing in frequency. Now it seems that small fish are still low volume, resulting in sideways action awaiting the big buys.

I wasn't around pre-'bubble' and am curious about volume comparison. Before the bubble hype got too silly, was it like this, or were the little fishies more active than we're seeing now?

The little fishes will accelerate the rally if the buys keep up much longer.  We are close to wave 3 of 3 off the recent $65 bottom.  In the middle of such a wave comes the so called "point of recognition".  If we don't see such an acceleration then Blitz will be gloating again.



227. Post 2853736 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: gog1 on August 02, 2013, 01:40:08 PM
I believe coins are showing up on the ask at gox again.  Would love to see the bid sum / ask sum graph.

http://blockchained.com/



228. Post 2859785 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: Cablez on August 03, 2013, 12:39:10 PM
I thought it might have been there to make the weekend less bleak. Guess I will have to see now what Sunday brings.

Can we finish Saturday first?  11.25 hours left in UTC.



229. Post 2862745 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: bcdev on August 04, 2013, 02:07:30 AM
They are registered as a money transmitter almost all over the world. They must have a great legal team and lots of experience.
If they'd adopt it now they'd become the mtgox of bitcoin transmitting overnight.

Some day we will either laugh at thinking, that devil could adopt bitcoin, or laugh how we thought they didn't see the obvious opportunity.

Merchants want fiat not BTC.  Unless paypal merchants can receive BTC payments in USD, it will mean nothing.  The only other benefit is people can buy BTC with Paypal.  Cool addition but hardly an earth shattering update.  Even if such rumors were true, any rise in value would be little more than a speculative bubble if its just BTC -> BTC transactions.  My $0.02.
I tend to disagree. Adoption by a "bank" as huge as PayPal would:
1) Generate a massive media coverage.
2) Make much more things available for purchase using Bitcoin through PayPal's currency exchange.
3) Make many companies adopt Bitcoin if it'd be as easy as "selecting an option" in PayPal.


+1.  In addition, PayPal would love it because they could buy BTC with PPUSD.



230. Post 2862766 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: Kazu on August 04, 2013, 02:15:51 AM
The only way a merchant would want BTC is if a supplier wanted BTC. This could be just somebody selling a service, which would be fine, but if you are buying an actual product, you'd need the manufacturer to want BTC, which would mean you'd need some of the people working for the manufacturer to want BTC (or I suppose the raw goods provider).

What I'm trying to say is that no big company is going to want BTC at this point unless they are either (A) created from the ground up around BTC or (B) they have some way of offloading that BTC to individuals that want BTC. Companies at this point wont want BTC, people will.

Companies don't have to want BTC at this stage.  Let them take their fiat.

But when they start seeing the option to pay their suppliers in BTC they might look further.  It is only AFTER mass adoption that most merchants will want to accept it directly.  They don't want to be speculators, but if it can cut costs they might consider holding some briefly.  PayPal could give Bitcoin quite a bit of momentum in that direction by accepting Bitcoin payments for conversion to the recipient's local fiat for all accounts.  They already have the legal team with the most expertise in internet payment and currency conversion regulations.  They could leverage their unique capabilities, but they also know that they can time their entry because any other entrant has to spend a lot more time and money deciphering and meeting regulations.  Just because they will be ready to throw the switch doesn't mean they will just yet.



231. Post 2932020 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on August 14, 2013, 12:41:21 PM
Come on, for once there's actual news. The Feds are going to try and fight Bitcoin. If you think they'll fail it's quite bullish don't you think?

Don't underestimate the disdain that TA devotees feel towards anything not based on traditional stock/commodity-market technical analysis.

The very idea that news might affect a market (even as new and unprecedented a market as BTC) is heresy, an affront to their existing orthodoxy.

 Smiley

Nope, I believe news affect FX markets, but not bitcoin.
I guess I'm a bit of a market analysis agnostic. I don't buy into either philosophy wholeheartedly, but try to use both to my advantage.

As for news not affecting Bitcoin, how about the news of the Satoshi Dice sale and payment to shareholders in BTC? Almost immediately the price dropped by over $10 and while the expected great selloff never happened, it took a week to recover. I'd say that news affected the Bitcoin market, albeit only temporarily.

It wasn't almost immediately... it was 6 hours later after pages of discussion on where cheerleaders made up bullshit reasons why it would drop.  Once they had enough people convinced, it happened.  It is not the news per se... it is speculators overreacting to news and whipping to forums into a panic.  The news didn't change fundamentals and the market made that clear by burning most of the idiots who sold off.



232. Post 2934128 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on August 14, 2013, 01:40:00 PM
The news didn't change fundamentals and the market made that clear by burning most of the idiots who sold off.

This idiot actually profited from this.

Sure, but only the uberbears who move first benefit.  The rest are the sheep you guys lead to slaughter.



233. Post 2940630 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: Odalv on August 15, 2013, 06:32:06 PM
The point here is if you do a normal iTunes backup without encryption enabled, and then move to a new phone with a restored backup all your google auth tokens will be gone for good. Source: happened to me last month.

Actually it was scary easy just to email the services and ask them to remove 2 factor auth so I could login and re-enable. (CampBx, Coinbase, etc)

How they know you are not hacker ? !!!!

Don't you know that your email address is the keys to the kingdom in almost all security policies?



234. Post 2940680 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: Odalv on August 15, 2013, 06:37:55 PM
The point here is if you do a normal iTunes backup without encryption enabled, and then move to a new phone with a restored backup all your google auth tokens will be gone for good. Source: happened to me last month.

Actually it was scary easy just to email the services and ask them to remove 2 factor auth so I could login and re-enable. (CampBx, Coinbase, etc)

How they know you are not hacker ? !!!!

Don't you know that your email address is the keys to the kingdom in almost all security policies?

Don't you know how to write an email with any sender address ?

Yes.  There are obvious problems with using email as the end game of security, but the reality is that is how it works.  Plus, I would assume they would only accept requests from the address on the account. (yes it can be spoofed instead of just blank)



235. Post 2941881 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: variousbitcoins on August 15, 2013, 09:49:19 PM
http://video.foxnews.com/v/2609080779001/bitcoin-investigation-is-this-the-end-of-virtual-currency/?playlist_id=921261890001

Bullish or bearish?

Quote
Bitcoins, B-I-T-C-O-I-N-S, it's available to you inside the Google.



236. Post 2942064 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on August 15, 2013, 10:39:46 PM
http://skinnyreporter.com/obamagoldban.html

No date, no number for the Executive Order... I call B.S.



237. Post 2977344 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on August 21, 2013, 05:11:55 AM
Now is the time to go all in!
What! Has your account been hijacked, or are you trolling?
You are confusing me.

Trolling.  Always trolling.



238. Post 2979929 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: thoughtfan on August 21, 2013, 03:24:10 PM
Also, not that I want to stoke any potential bubble but I do like how this chart is looking, especially given the usd volume at peak would be equivalent to a third less now had the volume been distributed as it is these days.  (in case it is of interest I bought substantially with long-term in mind for the first time in a long while on Sunday).



That fits the exact premise of a bubble with a classic bulltrap.
It does indeed.  But how long does one wait, having stopped buying regularly since mid April, and with the belief that there's a reasonable chance bitcoin could increase in value enormously in the medium term, before resuming with my purchasing (or as in my case, buying with the money I would have been buying with had I continued)?  Because as far as I understand it there is no way until after the event of telling whether an upward trajectory was a bull trap or a recovery.  I don't believe looking at old patterns will help.  Although there is almost certainly some manipulation going on I don't subscribe to the manipulator conspiracy theories circulating.  I may be wrong but that's what risk taking is about.  Not only must manipulators also take risks (and may lose out if enough people ignore them and get on with what they were planning to anyway) but some 'manipulators' may also want the very same of Bitcoin as I do.

Truth is it fits the exact premise of any number of patterns but neither you nor I can say what it is - only in a month or two what it is likely to have been!

+1



239. Post 2989732 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on August 22, 2013, 06:57:38 PM
thoughts?

They should decentralize?

this is just the beginning of major exchange issues
Once the deflation is in full force, we will see more outages. when selling starts in earnest, NASDAQ, NYSE, etc. servers wont be able to handle it.
it is like 100,000 people trying to escape out of a baseball or soccer stadium at once when only one gate is open...


I wonder, the FED can just buy stocks that are being sold. The engines the exchanges use can handle the volume. I mean the FED is injecting a fair amount of that 85 billion a month into the stock markets. AT ALL COSTS they will not let people think the shit has hit the fan. The revolution will not be on television.   Cry

That said, I think the FIAT bubble is going to burst, but when? BTC has a "market cap" of 1+ Billion. The FED prints that amount every day by noon. It won't matter, if they try to create volatility there will probably be less to buy back if the currencies of the world are not doing well. Interesting experiment we got here.

And when some, even a small amount of that money goes into BTC, we will be talking valuations that are decoupled from current understanding. That is the best way to NOT put a value on things.

The FED can only "print" by creating more debt.  That debt must be paid back, with interest.  This is why "printing" is deflationary, and why everyone who screams about the FED devaluing the dollar will soon see their hypothesis fall on it's face.  Debt is hitting it's limits, and with interest rates continuing to rise dollars will soon be in short supply.



240. Post 2989921 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: Richy_T on August 23, 2013, 12:07:05 AM
The FED can only "print" by creating more debt.  That debt must be paid back, with interest.  This is why "printing" is deflationary, and why everyone who screams about the FED devaluing the dollar will soon see their hypothesis fall on it's face.  Debt is hitting it's limits, and with interest rates continuing to rise dollars will soon be in short supply.

Yes. This is why a gallon of gas is a dime and coffee can be had for 3 cents instead of a nickel.

They have done a great job growing the debt.  But since the 80s there has been a 2% increase in debt for every 1% increase in GDP.  Unless they can actually take rates to 0 and keep them there (AKA exponentially growing QE), they will have to pay down some debt to be able to afford the interest.  This, of course, would cause hyperinflation, which tends to make it not really an option.  But, yes, after the deflation, we will reinflate.  Lungs (debt levels) are full.  It is time to exhale.



241. Post 3030434 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on August 28, 2013, 08:08:32 PM
180 by last friday

This is correct if you calculate the "true" price of bitcoin. I calculate we are at true $210 right now. Gox shows price minus $50 evil whale suppression and minus $30 fed gov oppression. So in real reality, my predictions are rarely wrong

$300 True Price by Friday. Guaranteed.

So what will increase by $90?  The price, the whale suppression, or the gov oppression?  Probably a combination of all 3, but in what proportions?



242. Post 3030615 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on August 28, 2013, 10:03:06 PM
180 by last friday

This is correct if you calculate the "true" price of bitcoin. I calculate we are at true $210 right now. Gox shows price minus $50 evil whale suppression and minus $30 fed gov oppression. So in real reality, my predictions are rarely wrong

$300 True Price by Friday. Guaranteed.

So what will increase by $90?  The price, the whale suppression, or the gov oppression?  Probably a combination of all 3, but in what proportions?

It is a very complicated equation, beyond your noob analysis. Just trust me on this one

Roll Eyes

I have a degree in Mathematics.  Try me.



243. Post 3031114 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: solex on August 28, 2013, 11:14:19 PM
180 by last friday

This is correct if you calculate the "true" price of bitcoin. I calculate we are at true $210 right now. Gox shows price minus $50 evil whale suppression and minus $30 fed gov oppression. So in real reality, my predictions are rarely wrong

$300 True Price by Friday. Guaranteed.

So what will increase by $90?  The price, the whale suppression, or the gov oppression?  Probably a combination of all 3, but in what proportions?

It is a very complicated equation, beyond your noob analysis. Just trust me on this one

Roll Eyes

I have a degree in Mathematics.  Try me.

No good. You will need a degree in extispicy to unravel his computations

Tongue



244. Post 3043100 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: Beta-coiner1 on August 29, 2013, 02:38:02 PM
at the risk of getting slaughtered here, does no one feel the price is being propped up? don't get me wrong i've been well wrong since July consistently but I dont see unabashed demand for bitcoins, i see huge buys at 4 AM UK time when the US is starting to go to bed and massive bid walls appearing as has been the case it seems from 75 onwards.

I am just curious as to how far this will go, clearly there is little trading activity at these new prices and those walls propping up the price if they dissapeared we would find ourselves at 120 again in no time flat.

Just curious if I'm reading this wrong and this is actually huge demand / paradigm shift.  To me it seems like a giant bet on which way the whales will go next.
Hmmm.....Whales can only Dive,lol!

To paraphrase a colloquialism we air dwellers use:
What goes down, must come up.

Whales, in particular, have to surface regularly to breathe.



245. Post 3044598 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: BitcoinAshley on August 30, 2013, 06:29:21 PM
If we make it to $150, I switch to bull  Tongue


This is why bull traps are so effective
 Grin

EDIT: For the record, I am not claiming that this is or is not a bull trap, or making any comment whatsoever on the trappish or untrappish status of the recent price movements.

Shut your trap Tongue



246. Post 3060733 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: tobyaus on September 02, 2013, 01:04:29 AM
Just increased my position on this. See how we go. Next stop the moon.

Bulls cheering, bears cowering, newbies buying.... time for a shakeout.



247. Post 3082732 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: notme on September 02, 2013, 02:01:48 AM
Just increased my position on this. See how we go. Next stop the moon.

Bulls cheering, bears cowering, newbies buying.... time for a shakeout.

Yep, sorry tobyaus.




248. Post 3082785 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: NamelessOne on September 04, 2013, 08:18:30 PM
Just increased my position on this. See how we go. Next stop the moon.

Bulls cheering, bears cowering, newbies buying.... time for a shakeout.

Yep, sorry tobyaus.


This is a healthy correction in an upwards trend. A good breather after two months of climbing up.

Like I said, a shakeout.  I agree that so far it looks more like a correction than a reversal but only time can tell.



249. Post 3083711 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: tobyaus on September 04, 2013, 10:17:09 PM
Definitely a bit of panic selling there... then re-correcting.

Sorry tobyaus, heading down again.



250. Post 3092184 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on September 06, 2013, 04:57:40 AM
i would be more likely to believe that they created bitcoin so they could have a cloud of SUPER powerful computers breaking sha-2 encrypted data, non-stop 24/7, rather than believe they actually solved PvsNP

SHA is not an encryption algorithm.  It is a hash function.  You can't encrypt anything with any version of SHA.



251. Post 3126569 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on September 10, 2013, 11:38:13 PM
Trading has resumed but APIs are down or only partially-functional? Is this what happens when bots are not trading? I.e., literally almost zero volume. lol. Knew it all along. 90% of the volume is botwars.

What makes you think APIs are down?  My bot is working fine.



252. Post 3126656 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: DaSheep on September 11, 2013, 02:03:49 AM
Trading has resumed but APIs are down or only partially-functional? Is this what happens when bots are not trading? I.e., literally almost zero volume. lol. Knew it all along. 90% of the volume is botwars.

What makes you think APIs are down?  My bot is working fine.

Websocket and SocketIO APIs are down

They're always the first to fail... this is why I just use the https/json APIs.  I doubt other bot herders use those without a fallback, but I guess there might be a couple.



253. Post 3126845 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: DaSheep on September 11, 2013, 02:23:42 AM
Trading has resumed but APIs are down or only partially-functional? Is this what happens when bots are not trading? I.e., literally almost zero volume. lol. Knew it all along. 90% of the volume is botwars.

What makes you think APIs are down?  My bot is working fine.

Websocket and SocketIO APIs are down

They're always the first to fail... this is why I just use the https/json APIs.  I doubt other bot herders use those without a fallback, but I guess there might be a couple.

Yes maybe but they are the only way to get realtime data.
Since I'm running a HFT bot and don't want to DDOS gox, the json API doesn't work for me.
Anyway I opened a support ticket 4 hours ago but no answer yet (surprise!).
Let's see how long it stays down this time but 10+ hours is a new highscore.. I think.

Ah... I just run a simple market maker that keeps standing orders and checks if they are filled once per minute.  The realtime data feeds wouldn't help enough to make up for the implementation effort and the semi frequent downtime.  The JSON APIs usually work even when their web interface is down.

Also, because I'm slightly OCD, you can't Distributed Denial of Service from a single IP Tongue.  It would just be DOS.



254. Post 3126979 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: thezerg on September 11, 2013, 03:21:04 AM
sure ppl have said this but

bitstamp has significantly more volume today than gox

11,403 vs 8,146 BTC right now

cool

Which might explain bitstamp having zero volume shown here:
http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/currency/USD.html

LOL, can someone recommend an equivalent multi-exchange summary site esp. with Chinese exchanges?  Preferably not one owned by any exchange...

Can you tell me why you think bitcoincharts.com is owned by an exchange?  I have seen this rumor several times lately, but I have seen no evidence, and my memory tells me differently (yet is not clear enough for me to tell you who in fact does own it).  Yes, their whois says "K.K. Tibanne Privacy", but that is just the standard privacy information for any domain Kalyhost registers.  Being hosted by Mark Karpeles company doesn't mean MtGox owns it.



255. Post 3127133 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: thezerg on September 11, 2013, 04:06:11 AM
sure ppl have said this but

bitstamp has significantly more volume today than gox

11,403 vs 8,146 BTC right now

cool

Which might explain bitstamp having zero volume shown here:
http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/currency/USD.html

LOL, can someone recommend an equivalent multi-exchange summary site esp. with Chinese exchanges?  Preferably not one owned by any exchange...

Can you tell me why you think bitcoincharts.com is owned by an exchange?  I have seen this rumor several times lately, but I have seen no evidence, and my memory tells me differently (yet is not clear enough for me to tell you who in fact does own it).  Yes, their whois says "K.K. Tibanne Privacy", but that is just the standard privacy information for any domain Kalyhost registers.  Being hosted by Mark Karpeles company doesn't mean MtGox owns it.

no reason other than what others have said on this forum... not really worth the time to investigate it.  Actually, it also has issues on my mobile firefox browser so I'm ready to change anyway.  It's script somehow stores up all the updates and then when I pop back to the page the rows blink yellow rapidly, unspooling all the page updates.  Obviously that's a bug that could be fixed (might even be in firefox but I don't see it on any other page) but also for mobile I'd rather it was not using bandwidth spooling all the page updates when the browser is hidden.


So you hear a rumor not worth investigating, so you assume it's true and spread it?



256. Post 3134876 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: vps15 on September 12, 2013, 06:26:49 AM
i feel like we are going over 150 this time or soon, but i'm way more anxious about buying in at 140 than when we were at back in the 90s and contemplating whether we would hit 100 in July.  I'd rather we just go back down to 110 before i buy again, but hopefully that will happen before too long and i loose my nerve and buy in above 140.
You had your chance to buy cheap coins when the price was artificially below 130 during the recent beartrap.

Hm, what do you mean artificially? To me that implies manipulation. The only potential manipulation would be a cash whale wanting a lower price.. which isnt... really manipulation.


After systematically pushing the price up for almost two months with well-placed periodic large buys accompanied by immediate bidwalls to prevent slippage, then after letting market inertia carry for a couple of days without intervention, using a couple of 5k-6k dumps to panic the price down by over $20, they spent a similar amount to return it to where it started, buying and hoarding an unknown amount of coins when the price was down below 130.

Not manipulation? This whole market is a manipulation circlejerk.

This is why outdated 19th-century/early-20th-century technical analysis is futile in the world of Bitcoin. It's time to think outside the box or get stuck in the tarpits like dinosaurs.

I earned bitcoins daytrading back in March/April by anticipating dDOS attacks on MtGox. The smart money now is on anticipating whale manipulation.

Of course the smart people don't publicize their predictions, or at least not precisely.

What a dick




257. Post 3156725 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on September 15, 2013, 03:06:17 AM
WOW!!!

Without chartbuddy, I'll have to sub.

NOTE: Most sites have crashed by now and are far behind, this is last accurate image of status!





lies!



258. Post 3160439 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on September 15, 2013, 11:00:46 AM
Mentioned by wonkytonky elsewhere.

Look what happened on Sept 4th, the last time they kissed. (Strong down move)

http://blockchained.com/depth_mtgox_15d.png

Sorry, but those Y-axis labels are arbitrary.  Bids and ask touching mean nothing.  See, the longer term chart shows something different:



259. Post 3160443 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: grovestr on September 15, 2013, 11:21:20 AM
I will never understand why people use ms paint when there's gimp and inkscape.
I will never understand why people download some sh-t from internet when they have perfectly professional image editor MS Paint.

Some of us don't have MS Paint.  It requires you pay for your OS and give up your security and freedom.



260. Post 3162285 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: RationalSpeculator on September 15, 2013, 10:20:22 PM

It comes at a high time/knowledge/discomfort price.  


Trust me, that's only because you learned Windows first.  When I use Windows, it always takes me 10x longer to accomplish any task than on my Linux box.



261. Post 3164288 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on September 16, 2013, 12:50:07 AM

It comes at a high time/knowledge/discomfort price.  


Trust me, that's only because you learned Windows first.  When I use Windows, it always takes me 10x longer to accomplish any task than on my Linux box.

Why would I trust you when you are obviously lying/full of shit?

Roll Eyes



262. Post 3173612 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: RationalSpeculator on September 17, 2013, 12:00:06 PM
How do you know? Bitcoinity incorrectly labels things because it goes by 'trending up/down" which doesnt tell you with certainty that something was a buy or sell. Trading.i286 should act the same as clarkmoody where it really means sell or buy, even if someone just market sold for more than someone else just market bought.

I find the red and green colors very confusing on i286

green should be buys, red should be sells but I understand it's the inverse, right?

Why?

If the buy orders get filled, they are filled by sells and the candles will show red.

If the sell orders get filled, they are filled by buys and the candles will show green.



263. Post 3173682 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on September 17, 2013, 02:41:13 PM
How do you know? Bitcoinity incorrectly labels things because it goes by 'trending up/down" which doesnt tell you with certainty that something was a buy or sell. Trading.i286 should act the same as clarkmoody where it really means sell or buy, even if someone just market sold for more than someone else just market bought.

I find the red and green colors very confusing on i286

green should be buys, red should be sells but I understand it's the inverse, right?

Why?

If the buy orders get filled, they are filled by sells and the candles will show red.

If the sell orders get filled, they are filled by buys and the candles will show green.

not necessarily

their could be nothing but selling going on and price go up! its not That hard to orchestrate... bids outbid higher and higher and seller sell slowly.

Sure, but what I described happens way more often.  Anyway, my point was to not get hung up on colors.  For every buy there is a sell.



264. Post 3178069 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on September 17, 2013, 09:51:08 PM
Holding my bitcoin, because we are about to bust through $140 (to $152).



Good luck with that.



265. Post 3229102 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Voktar on September 25, 2013, 02:49:59 AM
Oh man i hate so much that 1.0 BTC bot that sells every 5 seconds, it's has been selling for weeks at the tops and the bottoms.

It seems that has an infinite supply of coins and is painting red all day my dear clarkmoody, please stoooop, you can't withdrawal dollars from Gox so don't sell  Cheesy Cheesy


Or maybe he can?

If he has enough funds to make arrangements with Gox (and selling 1 BTC/min seems to indicate he does), he will make bank on the arbitrage.

BTW, "someone" is also making corresponding buys on stamp. Wink



266. Post 3255884 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: chodpaba on September 28, 2013, 06:08:47 PM
Zerocoin will only happen in the form of an altcoin.

In that case, it will be interesting to see what happens with whichever alt adopts the protocols.

Zerocoin does not give you free anonymity.  For that, you also have to add in random time delays.  Otherwise, it is a simple timing analysis away from bitcoin.  And, of course, time is money.



267. Post 3288016 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: solex on October 01, 2013, 06:37:14 AM

The handle is ready to fire!



lol

nice try Tongue



268. Post 3288330 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: btcontilt on October 02, 2013, 08:34:52 PM
imo I would still be cautious.  SR accounted for ~300-400 million in revenue a year for bitcoins.  Much of which was from fresh money being brought in by customers.  I don't know of anything else in the same stratosphere in terms of bringing in money into the network.  SR was/is a big deal.  Will there be other sites to take its place?  Sure.. but to what extent they will fill that void remains to be seen.  Also will customers/vendors of these sites be weary about jumping back into this market?

Bitcoin doesn't earn revenue, and SR was mostly neutral for supply and demand.

Buyers bought btc, sellers sold btc to buy product.



269. Post 3288629 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: thezerg on October 02, 2013, 09:22:02 PM
imo I would still be cautious.  SR accounted for ~300-400 million in revenue a year for bitcoins.  Much of which was from fresh money being brought in by customers.  I don't know of anything else in the same stratosphere in terms of bringing in money into the network.  SR was/is a big deal.  Will there be other sites to take its place?  Sure.. but to what extent they will fill that void remains to be seen.  Also will customers/vendors of these sites be weary about jumping back into this market?

Bitcoin doesn't earn revenue, and SR was mostly neutral for supply and demand.

Buyers bought btc, sellers sold btc to buy product.

Its just one data point but the amount of BTC seized (26,000 by one media outlet) tells us how much SR was affecting the supply of coin.  In other words, not much.  And this coin may be tied up as evidence for quite some time so its confiscation is not about to affect supply.

However, I would imagine that the SR economy formed a group of people willing to buy and sell at the current price whatever that might be (I'm assuming the drug price is in USD and constantly repriced in BTC, and of course that addicts need for a fix is fairly price insensitive -- but I don't actually know having never been to SR).  So some liquidity may leave the system.


Maybe a small amount... but certainly not $300-400 million worth.



270. Post 3295064 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Holliday on October 07, 2013, 07:44:23 PM
Supermax for a skinny nerd who ran an illegal website... Seems logical they would only put Aryan supremacist/murderers/rapists in those kinds of prisons. Not some guy who ran an obscure online drugs marketplace.

Why does being an Aryan supremacist warrant supermax?

You equate bigotry to murder and rape?

Is it not possible for an Aryan supremacist to be a nonviolent noncriminal?

They are not equal, but history shows a very strong correlation.



271. Post 3327161 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 12, 2013, 09:07:31 PM


Nice price action, but volume/momentum shows bearish divergence.



272. Post 3327304 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 12, 2013, 09:44:14 PM
Roll Eyes lol







Nice price action, but volume/momentum shows bearish divergence.
StochRSI is the one to watch  

was down now up again

 Cheesy

StochRSI is what I was looking at.

It was much higher at the earlier price peaks.  Volume on up moves has died off.  I'm not saying it can't pick up, just that it will need quite a push to make new highs from here.



273. Post 3352183 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: Spekulatius on October 16, 2013, 10:03:39 PM
Gentlemen, the options for tonight's entertainment:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=82626.msg3352156#msg3352156



So.... up, down, or sideways

Brilliant deduction!



274. Post 3364088 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on October 18, 2013, 07:14:04 PM
interest rates to borrow usd are sky high just now on bitfinex.

300%!!

wha? you can short USD?

you lend your USD to traders  at wtv % interest you want.

no one is lending right now... thats why its 300% interest,  i guess its because the bulls exhausted the USD, everyone is long.

This is a bearish signal, suggesting the run-up is extended.
Bitcoin kills bears for breakfast though so don't think I am recommending anything.

Bearish divergences on most timeframes as well.  Momentum/volume just isn't there.



275. Post 3364194 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: Sword Smith on October 18, 2013, 07:26:44 PM
interest rates to borrow usd are sky high just now on bitfinex.

300%!!

wha? you can short USD?

you lend your USD to traders  at wtv % interest you want.

no one is lending right now... thats why its 300% interest,  i guess its because the bulls exhausted the USD, everyone is long.

This is a bearish signal, suggesting the run-up is extended.
Bitcoin kills bears for breakfast though so don't think I am recommending anything.

Bearish divergences on most timeframes as well.  Momentum/volume just isn't there.
So you think the sellers will stampede to the exchanges soon?

I don't trade short term.  I'm not giving trading advice.  I'm just saying I wouldn't be surprised if this was an ending move for the longer term rally off $65.  However, I've been around bitcoin long enough to know it could also double from here.



276. Post 3365778 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 19, 2013, 12:41:33 AM
Here. We. Are.

Started at the bottom...

now the whole team's fucking here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pID03RrmKow

Blocked for us USians.



277. Post 3365973 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

We have 5 waves up from $65.  Elliot would say we need an ABC before we can go too much higher, but bitcoin is bitcoin so we may just rocket for the fun of it.  That said, there have been some pretty effective bear raids lately, so there is a chance there may be a few btc to be gained by a well timed sell.



278. Post 3368497 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: Dhuum on October 19, 2013, 02:15:17 PM
Clarkmoddy and trading.i286 not loading charts for me, is Gox lagging like hell?



Lag: 0.00s



279. Post 3368743 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 19, 2013, 02:41:53 PM
HOLY MOLY!!!

i just woke up to this

 Shocked Shocked Shocked

You silly bear Tongue



280. Post 3369010 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 19, 2013, 03:46:33 PM
we might be going for a new ATH, I mean its hard for me to believe... but the market shows no sign of weekness, if anything we are getting stronger on the way up.

this either ends very soon, or we will bubble to 1000$

The "bearish divergences" I've been whining about have mostly evaporated.  There is a huge bullish opportunity here if there is enough cash in reserve to drive it a bit higher with volume.



281. Post 3369202 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: justusranvier on October 19, 2013, 04:26:15 PM
[22:33] <@MagicalTux> samson_: downloading new blocks as fast as bitcoind can
Services needing high uptime should really look at switching to one of the alternate implementations (Bits of Proof or btcd).

The Satoshi client is a prototype, not an engineered final product.

They should also have several fallbacks.  They already generate and sign the transactions with their own code, so they just need to broadcast it.  Any client can do that.

Perhaps when the coins become available the asks might fill in a bit on the various exchanges.



282. Post 3369284 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: justusranvier on October 19, 2013, 04:34:56 PM
They should also have several fallbacks.  They already generate and sign the transactions with their own code, so they just need to broadcast it.  Any client can do that.
These alternate implementations do things like separate the blockchain management from the network communication from the wallet.

It means you can do things set up clustering on the various pieces for better performance and load balancing.

You know, grown-up software stuff.

I understand that.  I'm just saying that all they need is the network communication code to be able to broadcast the withdrawal transactions, and they should have redundancy in their setup in case a bug is triggered in one client or a server goes down.  Also, I doubt they are using bitcoin-qt... I'm not sure where kazu got that from.



283. Post 3369331 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: justusranvier on October 19, 2013, 04:51:06 PM
I'm just saying that all they need is the network communication code to be able to broadcast the withdrawal transactions, and they should have redundancy in their setup in case a bug is triggered in one client or a server goes down.  Also, I doubt they are using bitcoin-qt... I'm not sure where kazu got that from.
Their problem is that their wallet and their blockchain database and their network code are all in one package, so they can't generate transactions because they don't know which outputs they have to spend.

Once those three things get separated it become a lot easier. If you've still got a working blockchain database, and you are keeping track of which outputs you've spend and which you haven't, then you can generate the transaction manually and use the pushtx feature on blockchain.info to broadcast it if need be.

That's not true.  They give you the transaction id when you withdrawal, which means the transaction has to be created and signed.  It is later broadcast on the network.  There is always some delay, but with the outage the delay was longer than normal.



284. Post 3369344 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: dserrano5 on October 19, 2013, 04:53:01 PM
Also, I doubt they are using bitcoin-qt... I'm not sure where kazu got that from.

Quote
[22:33] <@MagicalTux> samson_: downloading new blocks as fast as bitcoind can

bitcoind != bitcoin-qt, but whatever.... also, just because they use bitcoind to handle the networking and blockchain doesn't mean that bitcoind has the only copy of the data and the only codepaths that can work with said data.



285. Post 3369356 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: justusranvier on October 19, 2013, 04:56:17 PM
They give you the transaction id when you withdrawal, which means the transaction has to be created and signed.  It is later broadcast on the network.  There is always some delay, but with the outage the delay was longer than normal.
In that case they should just route the transaction through: http://blockchain.info/pushtx

That is a good example of a possible fallback they could implement, as I suggested.



286. Post 3369390 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: theonewhowaskazu on October 19, 2013, 04:58:14 PM
Also, I doubt they are using bitcoin-qt... I'm not sure where kazu got that from.

Quote
[22:33] <@MagicalTux> samson_: downloading new blocks as fast as bitcoind can

bitcoind != bitcoin-qt, but whatever.... also, just because they use bitcoind to handle the networking and blockchain doesn't mean that bitcoind has the only copy of the data and the only codepaths that can work with said data.

Actually they are the exact same thing. QT just contains what is effectively a GUI wrapper.

Since I am a programmer by trade, the difference seems pretty large to me, but I fully understand that under the hood they have the same engine.  But bitcoin-qt has a lot more code, and has a much larger attack surface.



287. Post 3369414 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: justusranvier on October 19, 2013, 05:04:01 PM
That is a good example of a possible fallback they could implement, as I suggested.
Yes. I'm curious, though, how they manage to do that with an extended downtime on their node. Do they route all incoming deposits directly to cold storage or do they route incoming deposits to the hot wallet and only move some of it to cold storage when it gets too big?

I don't know how they route deposits and handle cold/hot wallet balances.  They should also be able to fall back to other methods for checking on deposits.  They know the addresses.  I don't know if they have the keys for deposit address though without bitcoind, so they might not be able to move the coins.  It would be interesting to see the details of their setup.  A lot could probably be gleaned by a thorough examination of the blockchain given some known deposit addresses and withdrawal origin addresses.



288. Post 3369425 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: theonewhowaskazu on October 19, 2013, 05:08:05 PM
Also, I doubt they are using bitcoin-qt... I'm not sure where kazu got that from.

Quote
[22:33] <@MagicalTux> samson_: downloading new blocks as fast as bitcoind can

bitcoind != bitcoin-qt, but whatever.... also, just because they use bitcoind to handle the networking and blockchain doesn't mean that bitcoind has the only copy of the data and the only codepaths that can work with said data.

Actually they are the exact same thing. QT just contains what is effectively a GUI wrapper.

Since I am a programmer by trade, the difference seems pretty large to me, but I fully understand that under the hood they have the same engine.  But bitcoin-qt has a lot more code, and has a much larger attack surface.
What are you going to attack on Bitcoin-QT that you can't attack on Bitcoind? The connection to the Bitcoin network is by far the most vulnerable place in both, and they happen to run essentially the same code.

The GUI code....  Yes, networking absolutely demands the tightest security and cleanest code, but that's exactly why most vulnerabilities are found in less important code.  It does not have as much attention paid to it.  Once you can execute arbitrary code, you can do anything you want with the network code or wallet code.  Hopefully the user doesn't unlock their wallet Wink.



289. Post 3370084 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: gandhibt on October 19, 2013, 07:19:05 PM
Status update? What is happening here? You can't move btc to gox or out?

I would guess that it is all synced up by now.



290. Post 3370988 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: TERA on October 19, 2013, 11:21:41 PM
Whoa where did gox get 55K volume? I thought it was dying. Do bots just like collectively losing fees?

Just because some idiots run around screaming about it all the time doesn't mean it is dead.



291. Post 3381400 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on October 21, 2013, 06:21:00 PM
so if the price keeps rising, how would we ever use it as a real currency to buy stuff?
i'm pretty sure everybody who has them has them for buy and hold or making profit, not for purchasing goods - I certainly don't because in two months the price might have doubled, and I would curse myself for giving them away "back then" instead of using real currency.


Your question is hard to understand.. why would the price rising affect its usefulness for purchasing goods?

If bitcoin rises, it would have been better to pay with fiat.



292. Post 3382095 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: molecular on October 21, 2013, 08:00:28 PM
You are forgetting an important dynamic: Interest rates. When consumption falls, savings rise and there are thus more money to be lent out. That means that the supply of money for loans rises and the price for loans fall which is the same as the interest rate falling. That means that it becomes more attractive to invest with borrowed money and this increases efficiency (if the investment is sound) which then increases the purchasing power and thus increases consumption. Yes. Capitalism is cool!

I didn't read the context, but this cool mechanism is being effectively anihilated by the feds easing.


=> we do not have capitalism any longer in the United States.



293. Post 3387630 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on October 22, 2013, 02:52:09 PM
It's certainly possible to make additional profit trading, and despite the many losers there are always some winners. It seems to me, though, that the average person would be satisfied with Bitcoin-level annual gains if they believe it has a future, or if they understand and agree with the idea that Bitcoin is a heavily asymmetric bet. If you believe Bitcoin has a good chance of going mainstream, you believe you've been privileged to identify the investment opportunity of the century in the form of simply buying and holding.

Of course "you can always have more," but is it really that people are so easily looking this gift horse in the mouth, or is it something else? It seems to me that such a ready desire to increase the risk is more a sign of not really grasping Bitcoin's potential. It seems the mentality is to "get while the getting's good" because Bitcoin may not work out. I suppose everyone's had that thought at some point: "Bitcoin may eventually get squashed out of existence by governments or hackers, but I bet I can ride this train for one or two big jumps and cash out enough to live on." With that fearful mindset it becomes appealing to try to boost your gains since you don't know if you intend to see where this ride goes, and you don't really know if you believe it could ever reach $10,000 or $100,000 per coin.

And really, that's fine. Not everyone is a visionary, and this isn't a religion. Moreover, some bitcoin holders are experienced traders and would only risk small portions of their stash. But the tendency for so many people to so readily engage in such notoriously treacherous trading trying to catch price movements seems like it is a problem of lack of education or thought about Bitcoin's potential, including perhaps deep understanding of economics and technology adoption and otherwise whow deeply broken the establishment systems are and what circumnavigating them means for the global standard of living, etc.

Well said.



294. Post 3387749 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: prophetx on October 22, 2013, 03:03:05 PM
well i don't daytrade but i think it is good that people do, it provides liquidity

if every just kept their btc under their mattress (print out of private key), then there would be no chance for anyone new to get their hands on some

And that's why I run my market making it even though at times like this I slowly bleed coins.  Sure , I could shut it off, but then the rally would get unsustainable more quickly.



295. Post 3387881 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: professorhandsome on October 22, 2013, 03:19:42 PM
I like to hope that the bears in this kind of market sustain enough losses that their power to irrationally drive it down is greatly diluted. I suppose corrections are natural, but it's nice to have a collective sense of confidence when the smart ones know it's going up no matter the short-term obstacles. I guess the new money have to get their coins from someone.

Bears will be burned, but remember that they are the only thing keeping this from overshooting too far to the upside.  When we overshoot, we correct much harder and then the bears have a field day (or month, or year).



296. Post 3398198 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on October 23, 2013, 11:23:03 PM
Still less than 10% down to stamp. China follows. Looks sound.

When we pass all time high, every fucking lowly newspaper in the world will have an article about it.



Could be true, so if someone wants price down he needs to dump at max $250 without ATH. Right?

Why would anyone want to do that? Self-sacrifice?

Why would anyone want high price now? Why not hoarding for a year or two in the $50 - $200 range? Just a thought.

We already hoarded at the $3 to $7 range?

ding ding ding, we have a winner



297. Post 3428964 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on October 28, 2013, 05:37:16 PM

What does it mean exactly that it's listed there?

It means it was filed (as the status field says).  In other words, nothing we didn't know months ago.



298. Post 3430001 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: wobber on October 28, 2013, 09:08:54 PM
Even lower this time I presume. Operation Bubblepop in progress.

Beginnings of wave C?



299. Post 3430090 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: windjc on October 28, 2013, 09:27:16 PM
I have a better question. Why do dozens of people on this forum who have never had any direct interaction with an ETF and no direct knowledge on the underlining motivations for starting and running one, have a fracking opinion they think is worth sharing on this forum?Huh

I do know how ETF work. In fact my stock portfolio is almost only composed of ETFs (with two lines only, one from my country's stock exchange, one from the US one).

Quote
ETF = good for valuation of bitcoin. That is all anyone needs to know. So much freaking hot air in here. LOL

I agree. Most of people here don't understand this.

Yeah, I was not obviously referring to you.  

Its actually funny, (although it annoys me when I am actually trying to find real-important-topic-related-info in a thread), how stupid so many of the bitcoin early adopters are. I mean, there is literally this unrefined, ignorant, idealistic, caveman like quality to so many of these early adopters. Bitcoin is entering a time where (HOPEFULLY!!!) more and more legitimate, well financed, regulated, structured 3rd wave Bitcoin companies, users and investors are going to enter the BTC universe. And eventually they will help drown out the noise.

I mean hats off to the non-authoritarian idealism that led to the birth and early propagation of bitcoin. But, man, evolution rules for a reason, and bitcoin is evolving into something potentially really special and massive. And its time, in my opinion, for this early adopter mentality to be replaced with a new type of visionary.  I am happy to ride that wave.

Well said.



300. Post 3430116 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on October 28, 2013, 09:31:45 PM
What happens to Bitcoin when over 50% of it is owned by wealthy elites? Time to pump something else?

And as they move out, smaller players will move away from charts and start doing business with their bitcoins.  Contraction of the bitcoin economy sows the seeds for the next expansion.  Once things have settled out, the whales will return.



301. Post 3453576 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: windjc on November 01, 2013, 12:07:45 AM
I'm still thinking the next major news to move the price will not be BTC news. Nothing has been fixed in the world economies and it's just a matter of time until yet another shoe drops.

Apparently homeland security is having a congressional hearing regarding crypto in November. That should make some waves

The senate's homeland security committee, not the DHS.



302. Post 3454312 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 01, 2013, 02:41:51 AM
Let's say the snowballing momentum of margin position covers, panic, and shorting causes it to violate its appropriate trendline.  It might catch 130 (weekly ema) and if armageddon happens then  maybe 90 (how low weekly ema was violated in July).



Did you just learn about Bitfinex today?  People have been taking long and short positions on there for some time now.

in theory all the leveraged positions should lower volatility.

until a squeeze happens and forced liquidation begins Wink



303. Post 3458858 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 01, 2013, 07:40:29 PM
I think a lot of people are going to get burned come monday/tuesday.

No matter what happens when the stability ends, a lot of people will be burned.

However, there are $2mil on loan at bitfinex for long positions.  If I were accumulating on a massive scale and saw that, I would squeeze those to get a better price.



304. Post 3458979 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: windjc on November 01, 2013, 07:58:20 PM
I think a lot of people are going to get burned come monday/tuesday.

No matter what happens when the stability ends, a lot of people will be burned.

However, there are $2mil on loan at bitfinex for long positions.  If I were accumulating on a massive scale and saw that, I would squeeze those to get a better price.

How do you know those are for longs? Could be for shorts.

How would borrowing USD allow you to take a short position?

There are 1900ish BTC lent out to people with short positions.



305. Post 3484753 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on November 05, 2013, 02:27:25 AM
What's even more shocking is the level of support above $215 (unless those are fake buy walls of course :p).

Aren't walls always fake? If I've learned anything from my years in bitcoins, it's that all walls everywhere are fake.  

Walls are simultaneously fake and real, until observed. Then they become one or the other, depending on the testing conditions.

This is called Quantum Speculation. It's science, bro.


Dude like...whoaa man. Like....whoa.

I'm high w/ a bag of popcorn, watching several tickers.

popcorn.... that's what I'm missing



306. Post 3489877 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: MicroFi on November 05, 2013, 04:20:44 PM
Gox BTC withdraws are taking ages again.
Smiley i was just about to post a question on this subject.
withdrew my last coins there and got more and more nervous because my txid hasn't shown up at blockchain.info after half an hour.
i've never had this problem before, how long can this take at maximum?

It can take a while.
My last transfer from Localbitcoins to MTGox took me about an hour - as the transfer is only accepted after 6 checks.

The 6 confirmations rule for deposits is widely known.  hlynur is asking about withdrawals, which previously were broadcast within minutes but have been taking several hours lately to even appear on the network, let alone get confirmed in a block.



307. Post 3489926 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: Dhuum on November 05, 2013, 04:26:13 PM
SUM ASK must be depleted!

under 20k on gox



308. Post 3490030 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: thetopham on November 05, 2013, 04:36:50 PM
FML

Never sell them all.



309. Post 3490126 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: rezurect on November 05, 2013, 04:49:07 PM
Wow.
Two hundred Fucking Fifty??

What the hell guys.
China yes, other than that Any fundamental change to BTC to sustain the rise?
I dont get it. Did the Winklevii S1 get through?


Only 21 million. Ever.



310. Post 3490160 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: hd060053 on November 05, 2013, 04:51:54 PM
it is getting instabil now, one 1k sell and it will crash heavy.

We can only hope there are still some bears alive with the balls.  I know I've got my bids set.



311. Post 3502809 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: Chainsaw on November 06, 2013, 09:42:54 PM
Woot, gox, stamp parity.

Finally!

This means the market perception of Gox's failure likelihood has now reduced from 5-10% down to 0%, right?  Grin

No it means, Gox and stamp have an equal likelihood to fail.



312. Post 3505839 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

party like it's page 1999!



313. Post 3506188 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: KaTXi on November 07, 2013, 06:19:40 AM
I'm starting to freak out a little bit... Take a look at the asks in all markets, a few K's until 300, then NOTHING.
This means that if we break 300 and NO new BIG whales appear there is no support at the top, we could repeat what happened in april, more than doubling in one day (from 300) and then...

$1.6 million to $300/BTC on gox
$0.8 million to $300/BTC on stamp



314. Post 3506203 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on November 07, 2013, 06:38:11 AM
So, probably a stupid question to ask to all the bulls, but do you think there's a chance we see 300 today? Should I rebuy back at a loss?

Can you find a time (excluding the current run up which is still playing out) when we passed a previous all time high and didn't at least double?



315. Post 3506219 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: oakpacific on November 07, 2013, 06:41:38 AM
At what point do the gox fiat holders freak out at the diminishing bitcoin orderbook and just panic buy to get out? Time to put some gas on this fire.
Bitstamp is even worse in terms of BTC available for purchase.

If the increasing prices don't lure some more coins onto the orderbook soon it's going to get very interesting.

Don't worry, BTCs will come in, miners have to pay their bills after all.

That's only a trickle compared to average daily volume.

Gox is down to 15k BTC for sale.



316. Post 3552660 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: hmmmstrange on November 11, 2013, 09:36:45 PM
I have started a policy of ignoring anyone who openly admits to trading on gox. I encourage everyone to do the same. The content of this thread has greatly improved.

Maybe it's time to start a thread listing everyone who trades on gox to publicly chastise them to do the right thing.

Why do you feel everyone needs to agree with you about Gox.  If I lived in Japan you can bet your ass MtGox would be my first choice.  For certain people it really is the best option.  Just because it doesn't fit your needs well doesn't mean every single person should shun it.



317. Post 3560722 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: Voodah on November 12, 2013, 05:39:51 PM
Everyone please, stop the madness !

I don't wanna see any more posts (probably americans) with people saying saying China wants to see the USD go down.

This is outright wrong, you need to stop reading this Wall observer and go read the newspapers first.

China is the absolute #1 investor in USD. Get your facts straight.

Well, since you apparently have your facts straight, please point me to a source that verifies you claim that "China is the absolute #1 investor in USD".



318. Post 3561442 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: Voodah on November 12, 2013, 05:56:17 PM
Everyone please, stop the madness !

I don't wanna see any more posts (probably americans) with people saying saying China wants to see the USD go down.

This is outright wrong, you need to stop reading this Wall observer and go read the newspapers first.

China is the absolute #1 investor in USD. Get your facts straight.

Well, since you apparently have your facts straight, please point me to a source that verifies you claim that "China is the absolute #1 investor in USD".

They do own many billions worth of our bonds.

Yup, pretty much. It has been extremely conductive for their exporting strategy.

Quote
China is by far the largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasury securities.  At the end of July, the last month for which official statistics are available, it had stockpiled $1.2773 trillion in Treasuries.  The country is way in front of second-place Japan, whose portfolio was $141.9 billion smaller.  If you add in the Treasuries of autonomous Hong Kong, the hoard of the People’s Republic increases by $120.0 billion.

Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonchang/2013/10/06/what-if-china-stops-buying-u-s-government-debt/

FWIW though, in the last few weeks, this strategy appears to be shifting, but still, they hold most of the treasuries.

Largest foreign holder != #1 investor

The Fed and US citizens hold most of the treasuries.  How can you quote $1.3 trillion and then claim that is "most of the treasuries" when US debt is north of $16 trillion?  It looks like <10% from here.



319. Post 3585254 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Sword Smith on November 14, 2013, 10:36:14 PM

The word "fiat" means a decree or a dictate thus indicating a central authority. This does obviously not apply to Bitcoin or bitcoins and we should thus, in my opinion, avoid linking the word "fiat" with bitcoins.

No, I will not avoid "linking" the word fiat with Bitcoin because that is what Bitcoin or any other currency that has no intrinsic value is. Fiat.  You may not like that and even choose only the definitions that support your position, but it is what it is.  Fiat.
I am not picking definitions at will. Fiat means decree thus indicating central authority. I tried to be polite but:
http://goo.gl/fQX918

And he is using the definition from wikipedia's "Fiat Money" page.  I'm not saying I agree with him, but he already linked to his definition, so linking to a conflicting definition won't get you anywhere.



320. Post 3585456 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Sword Smith on November 14, 2013, 11:01:13 PM

If you actually followed the source wikipedia links to, it says the following:

Quote
I use the term fiat or abstract paper money interchangeably to stand for a government supplied means of payment of no intrinsic worth.

So not even your own source actually supports your claim. It's just Wikipedia messing up.

Not sure why this bothers some of you so much.  There is government fiat, now digital fiat, clam shell fiat, etc, etc.  As freethink just said, fiat isn't necessarily a bad thing.  It's not bad that USD is fiat in that sense.  What's bad about USD is that it is debt based.  It enters the system as debt.  It would actually be nice if the treasury would just issue sovereign money and break capital holders grip on our economy.
Fiat means decree which is the anti-thesis to Bitcoin. That is why it bothers me.

The decree is right here: http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Everyone here has accepted bitcoin as the implementation of that decree.



321. Post 3585635 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Sword Smith on November 14, 2013, 11:06:43 PM

If you actually followed the source wikipedia links to, it says the following:

Quote
I use the term fiat or abstract paper money interchangeably to stand for a government supplied means of payment of no intrinsic worth.

So not even your own source actually supports your claim. It's just Wikipedia messing up.

Not sure why this bothers some of you so much.  There is government fiat, now digital fiat, clam shell fiat, etc, etc.  As freethink just said, fiat isn't necessarily a bad thing.  It's not bad that USD is fiat in that sense.  What's bad about USD is that it is debt based.  It enters the system as debt.  It would actually be nice if the treasury would just issue sovereign money and break capital holders grip on our economy.
Fiat means decree which is the anti-thesis to Bitcoin. That is why it bothers me.

The decree is right here: http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Everyone here has accepted bitcoin as the implementation of that decree.
No. I have not been told to use Bitcoin. I have chosen to. Thus it is a proposal and not a decree to me.

Fiat means (from the latin since you like etymology) "let there be".  In my mind, that paper fits that meaning quite well.  You are the one adding the forceful connotation to the term.



322. Post 3606415 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: accord01 on November 16, 2013, 10:47:59 PM
might as well ask on here: how do you verify (?pgp key) that the bitcoin qt is legit from bitcoin.org ?

http://bitcoin.org/en/download

notice the .exe is 9mb but in actuality it is 11.1 mb.... did someone alter it?

sirus runs that site, i doubt something odd is going on. (unless hacked)

either way it is unprofessional to state a file is 9 mb and it is actually 11.1mb.  especially to a new user that is getting to know bitcoins

And whining about it in the Speculation subforum will get you nowhere.

File an issue here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/issues



323. Post 3609574 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: bnjmnkent on November 17, 2013, 06:47:43 AM
Isn't there a checksum?

Yes, there is a link on the download page "Verify release signatures".

Verifying the checksum of Bitcoin software is important.
If someone were able to change the software on the site, don't you think they'd be able to adjust the checksum mentioned there as well?
That's why developers should always sign the checksums with their keys. However, the client_downloads to checksum_downloads ratio
is daunting.

The checksums are signed.



324. Post 3617195 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Sitarow on November 17, 2013, 11:09:50 PM
The crash from the eventual high is going to be epic.


LOL, some of the people here will still be holding their BTC when they look like the guy in the bottom half of that picture.

Bitcoin : You really can take it with you when you die.
I'll sell a few close to $1000  Wink

There is always a bigger fish in this market.



This is why we no longer have any bearish whales:



325. Post 3617920 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: bitboyben on November 18, 2013, 01:01:16 AM
Keep going west and you'll find China eventually.

East works too.



326. Post 3659922 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: BitPirate on November 21, 2013, 06:16:09 AM
Ye woke up and couldnt resist. This consolidation is taking too long and with all the massive bids, its looking too bullish.
If this is a bull trap, well played bears. Ill take my loss and go back in.

CHOO CHOO MF

Did you check the bids before or after I took 25% off of BTC China orderbook? (Yes, feels like a boss  Cool )

"Look at the Chinese buying so many BTC".

Ahem.

LOL



327. Post 3664319 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: xephireusMMX on November 21, 2013, 03:46:33 PM
I would kill for 22 BTC...I have 1/100 of that...

The reason why there are so many idiotic postings...
Probably more then 50% here have less then 1 btc and are younger then 18 years old -> can't take anything seriously from such users

Every "normal" guy can afford at least 10-100 btc.

Thats ridiculous. Very few "normal" guys can throw $70,000 USD onto what is still very much an extremely speculative investment. Maybe you're on wallstreet and think $70K is throw away money, but don't be confused. You have to be crazy well off to throw $70,000 into something as far out as bitcoin.


But the low is $7000 and anyone with a job can afford to save $7000 in few years. If not, something is wrong

That something is most likely they were born in a country where only the wealthy earn that much in a year.  Unfortunately, billions of people still fall in that category.  Seriously guys, extrapolation from Europe/North America to anyone/everyone is a sure fire way to look like a retard on the internet.



328. Post 3664378 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 21, 2013, 03:52:36 PM
I would kill for 22 BTC...I have 1/100 of that...

The reason why there are so many idiotic postings...
Probably more then 50% here have less then 1 btc and are younger then 18 years old -> can't take anything seriously from such users

Every "normal" guy can afford at least 10-100 btc.

Thats ridiculous. Very few "normal" guys can throw $70,000 USD onto what is still very much an extremely speculative investment. Maybe you're on wallstreet and think $70K is throw away money, but don't be confused. You have to be crazy well off to throw $70,000 into something as far out as bitcoin.

What does "on Wallstreet" even mean? Wink

I assume it means one works in a building on the street called "Wall Street" in New York City.  In other words, someone on Wall St. works for a big bank or invest firm, although I suppose there are some coffee shops on Wall St. too.



329. Post 3664420 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: San1ty on November 21, 2013, 03:57:32 PM
Now that we are discussing about anything.

Does anyone have an opinion on having a BTC donation address in your signature?
Have any of you ever gotten anything from having one? A cool story perhaps on how you randomly received a ton of BTC.

Kinda looks like begging in the digital age doesn't it Smiley. (And I'm taking part of it Cheesy).

When I am helpful, people send me BTC.  I practically forget I have an address in my Sig until someone tips me.  Check blockchain.info.  Bitcointalking has been highly profitable for me.



330. Post 3665074 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Mirsad on November 21, 2013, 04:58:55 PM
I don't give a shit what some poor kids think in a third world country (or america).
I just love to hear/read my bullshit in this forum.

So come on! buy more! We need more to the moon topics.

People like you are why I'm seriously considering leaving the US.



331. Post 3666018 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Mirsad on November 21, 2013, 05:05:13 PM
I don't give a shit what some poor kids think in a third world country (or america).
I just love to hear/read my bullshit in this forum.

So come on! buy more! We need more to the moon topics.

People like you are why I'm seriously considering leaving the US.

I'm not US resident.
We just have lots of dirty fiat from US tax evaders.

Well where do you live so I can cross that country off my list too.... I'm so sick of the arrogance of people in America and Europe.



332. Post 3666240 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: prof7bit on November 21, 2013, 06:51:01 PM
This is a monstrous fuckup of enormous proportions, if this is true then their trading engine is broken beyond repair and should be taken down and replaced by something else immediately!

Right, out of order execution is not acceptable.



333. Post 3666316 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: BarkinTree on November 21, 2013, 06:56:29 PM
I don't give a shit what some poor kids think in a third world country (or america).
I just love to hear/read my bullshit in this forum.

So come on! buy more! We need more to the moon topics.

People like you are why I'm seriously considering leaving the US.

I'm not US resident.
We just have lots of dirty fiat from US tax evaders.

Well where do you live so I can cross that country off my list too.... I'm so sick of the arrogance of people in America and Europe.
fyi "America" does not mean "United States"..... just thought you should know, as long as we are on this topic  Wink

Thanks for telling me what I already know Roll Eyes.  I chose the words I used carefully.



334. Post 3666373 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: seleme on November 21, 2013, 07:00:05 PM
I don't give a shit what some poor kids think in a third world country (or america).
I just love to hear/read my bullshit in this forum.

So come on! buy more! We need more to the moon topics.

People like you are why I'm seriously considering leaving the US.

I'm not US resident.
We just have lots of dirty fiat from US tax evaders.

Well where do you live so I can cross that country off my list too.... I'm so sick of the arrogance of people in America and Europe.

It's not about country, it's about individuals.

Mirsad is most probably a child of people who went to Switzerland from my own country, or at least my area, it's a name specific for Balkans... you know, that type of poor sods who start thinking they are something special day after they find their way from misery and make their first 1k. Or more precisely - cunts.

Certain cultures encourage this type of mindset.  It is those cultures I would prefer to avoid.



335. Post 3666395 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: BarkinTree on November 21, 2013, 07:02:49 PM
I don't give a shit what some poor kids think in a third world country (or america).
I just love to hear/read my bullshit in this forum.

So come on! buy more! We need more to the moon topics.

People like you are why I'm seriously considering leaving the US.

I'm not US resident.
We just have lots of dirty fiat from US tax evaders.

Well where do you live so I can cross that country off my list too.... I'm so sick of the arrogance of people in America and Europe.
fyi "America" does not mean "United States"..... just thought you should know, as long as we are on this topic  Wink

Thanks for telling me what I already know Roll Eyes.  I chose the words I used carefully.
oh? because the bolded made it pretty clear to me. so when you say "America" here, you mean to say that Central Americans, South Americans, Brazilians -- are arrogant like people in your country?

Yes, I mean to say that many Central and South Americans are also arrogant, although there are obviously differences.

South America in particular has many countries with serious socialism/entitlement problems.

That said, the US does take it to a whole new level.



336. Post 3666523 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: BarkinTree on November 21, 2013, 07:09:23 PM
what does socialism/entitlement have to do with arrogance? do you have the experience to believe what you say, or do you just make generalizations based on some right libertarian perspective of political system?

u.s. = fuck the poor, dick ride corporations. and u.s. has some of most arrogant people in the world, no question. so what does socialist context have to do with it?

How is feeling like you deserve handout just for breathing not arrogance?



337. Post 3666605 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 21, 2013, 07:26:33 PM
any minute now, the price will double. for sure


I think you might be bipolar dude.



338. Post 3666707 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 21, 2013, 07:30:39 PM
any minute now, the price will double. for sure


I think you might be bipolar dude.

I am!  Cheesy

but i was being sarcastic...

rest assured i have been sleeping fine and am not manic right now... the market is tho!

Right on, runs in my family too.

I think it's probably common in people who like markets.



339. Post 3666745 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: BarkinTree on November 21, 2013, 07:35:07 PM
what does socialism/entitlement have to do with arrogance? do you have the experience to believe what you say, or do you just make generalizations based on some right libertarian perspective of political system?

u.s. = fuck the poor, dick ride corporations. and u.s. has some of most arrogant people in the world, no question. so what does socialist context have to do with it?

How is feeling entitled to receive a handout not arrogance?
a handout? talk to me when corporations destroy your homeland, make your air unbreathable, destroy your rain forests and kill off your wildlife, all the while paying workers less and less and less? one of the reasons education systems continue to crumble is due to widespread corporate tax avoidance. they take and take and destroy our cultures bit by bit, and it's handout when we say things must change, else they must pay for the privilege? the game was rigged from the start -- fuck a handout. that term is inappropriate when the game was rigged against the poor.

having an opinion that may differ from yours regarding the limits of human dignity and of theft/exploitation, does not make a person arrogant. it is a difference of opinion. arrogance has to due with perception of one's own importance. if one favors equality, to whatever extent, that indicates the polar opposite -- that the importance of others equals their own. in other words, you are very much misusing the word.

Don't lecture me about corporations.  Buy the way, they are just getting started.  I live in the US.  They have stripped us bare already, but nobody around me gives a shit because they are too busy chasing a dream they will never reach but were told everyone could have.

How about the Venezuelan president forcing electronics and appliance sellers to take losses on all their merchandise recently?  That is fucking theft too.  Two wrongs don't make a right.  This is not the first rodeo for the corporations.  You are repeating the mistakes of the people of the United States, and you will wind up just like us unless you just shrug off the system and work on building something new.  Thinking you are important enough that stealing is okay is why I speak of arrogance.



340. Post 3666830 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 21, 2013, 07:47:48 PM
Malevolent is right. Never go full fiat. That's been historically a losing strategy, and that's a matter of fact - unless you sold to buy back lower and you succeeded, obviously.
The dude made half a million bucks.  I would be happy....

If he had left half on the table, he'd have another $100k by now.



341. Post 3667284 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: BarkinTree on November 21, 2013, 08:29:02 PM
what does socialism/entitlement have to do with arrogance? do you have the experience to believe what you say, or do you just make generalizations based on some right libertarian perspective of political system?

u.s. = fuck the poor, dick ride corporations. and u.s. has some of most arrogant people in the world, no question. so what does socialist context have to do with it?

How is feeling entitled to receive a handout not arrogance?
a handout? talk to me when corporations destroy your homeland, make your air unbreathable, destroy your rain forests and kill off your wildlife, all the while paying workers less and less and less? one of the reasons education systems continue to crumble is due to widespread corporate tax avoidance. they take and take and destroy our cultures bit by bit, and it's handout when we say things must change, else they must pay for the privilege? the game was rigged from the start -- fuck a handout. that term is inappropriate when the game was rigged against the poor.

having an opinion that may differ from yours regarding the limits of human dignity and of theft/exploitation, does not make a person arrogant. it is a difference of opinion. arrogance has to due with perception of one's own importance. if one favors equality, to whatever extent, that indicates the polar opposite -- that the importance of others equals their own. in other words, you are very much misusing the word.

Don't lecture me about corporations.  Buy the way, they are just getting started.  I live in the US.  They have stripped us bare already, but nobody around me gives a shit because they are too busy chasing a dream they will never reach but were told everyone could have.

How about the Venezuelan president forcing electronics and appliance sellers to take losses on all their merchandise recently?  That is fucking theft too.  Two wrongs don't make a right.  This is not the first rodeo for the corporations.  You are repeating the mistakes of the people of the United States, and you will wind up just like us unless you just shrug off the system and work on building something new.  Thinking you are important enough that stealing is okay is why I speak of arrogance.
corporations have not stripped u.s. bare, not nearly like elsewhere in the world. if you believe that, then i understand why you hold these opinions -- being from the u.s., whose corporations and government have bled the rest of the world far, far, far more than you and yours. more than you can probably imagine, from the sound of it.

i do not support statism. but i don't cater to this "two wrongs don't make a right" bullshit either. when people have been stolen from for years and generations, i do not judge them for trying to take a piece back. i find that right libertarians say to me, "sure, we agree, fuck the state. but everything that was taken from you as a result? it's for the rich now (who profited from the state), now go pull yourself up by the bootstraps." fuck that. are Palestinians arrogant for protesting the repeated theft of their land? once Israeli settlers take to such land, it becomes theirs, in their eyes. Palestinians are arrogant for feeling entitled to what was stolen from them? i imagine you say yes.

thinking that the whole of humanity is important enough that we rise up against the few that oppress us, again, is not arrogant in the least. even right libertarians would support such a notion, i would think. arrogance is about self-importance, self-entitlement. socialism has never been about that, except maybe for people in the u.s listening to repulicans. i imagine the people who want "government handouts" in the u.s. don't even know what socialism entails. they are just poor.

the "arrogance" of people in the u.s. has absolutely nothing to do with this. when people complain about people from the u.s., it is generally because they hardly recognize the rest of the world exists, and think they are superior to everyone else. this is very far removed from what you are suggesting about the "arrogance" of others. again, i think you are misusing the word. an inflated sense of self-importance has nothing to do with one's political philosophies -- political philosophies are not based in analyses of self. i've met many arrogant anarchists. i've met many arrogant capitalists.

Fine, you're arrogant because you can't stop talking about how much better you are than US citizens Tongue.

You don't know shit about what has happened to our populace and our land.  Corporations and wealthy individuals own everything.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States

BTW, I don't buy the whole capitalist-socialist dichotomy.  Everything is shades of gray, and it is the extremes you have to watch out for.

You seem to want to restrict the term arrogance to what is probably better termed "US exceptionalism".  Yes, this is a form of arrogance, but arrogance can take many forms.



342. Post 3667366 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on November 21, 2013, 08:41:51 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/fec-donors-cant-use-bitcoins-for-contributions/2013/11/21/53764d46-52ca-11e3-9ee6-2580086d8254_story.html

Any way of shorting the US?

Quote
But the FEC isn’t yet sold on allowing bitcoins to funnel into the bank accounts of political campaigns and outside groups supporting them, and commissioners deadlocked 3-3 along party lines Thursday.

lol



343. Post 3667384 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: YoYa on November 21, 2013, 08:44:15 PM
We got movement!

It's down.... prepare your fiat!



344. Post 3667983 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: BarkinTree on November 21, 2013, 09:18:11 PM
Fine, you're arrogant because you can't stop talking about how much better you are than US citizens Tongue.

You don't know shit about what has happened to our populace and our land.  Corporations and wealthy individuals own everything.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States

BTW, I don't buy the whole capitalist-socialist dichotomy.  Everything is shades of gray, and it is the extremes you have to watch out for.

You seem to want to restrict the term arrogance to what is probably better termed "US exceptionalism".  Yes, this is a form of arrogance, but arrogance can take many forms.
i don't have much of an opinion of u.s. citizens really. but the consensus about them is well established. i also don't buy the capitalist-socialist dichotomy... as it's commonly illustrated.

i think the perceived arrogance of people from the US is much due to US exceptionalism, yes -- i was making that point because that is what non-US folks are exposed to. but i am talking about the dictionary definition of "arrogance".

sure, there is great wealth inequality in the u.s. that doesn't mean there isn't far greater wealth inequality elsewhere, such as in South America. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Gini_Coefficient_World_CIA_Report_2009.svg

it also doesn't speak to the effect of historic exploitation of the southern hemisphere by the north. over 53% of world net worth (based on PPP) is concentrated in North America and Europe, which has less then 15% of world population. when we talk about wealth inequality, surely comparing that of the u.s. with that of that of bolivia is sort of ridiculous, right? are we talking about being entitled to basic human necessities, perhaps education? or are we talking about being entitled to a basic minimum income? or big screen tvs? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_of_wealth

in the u.s., when people complain about entitlements, i hear complaints about people buying big screen tvs with welfare checks. (i take that with grain of salt) surely, you don't think that these are the sort of entitlements that Brazilians seek? that they are arrogant for fighting for? especially given the nature of wealth inequality?

am i arrogant for fighting for a better education system for my children? i must feel so self-important?  Smiley

it's one thing if the state does not exists. it's another thing if the state will exists for the forseeable future, and exploits, and allows exploitation. in the latter case, i think it is only reasonable for people to try to reform the state, to legally prescribe what had once been unwritten -- their ownership, their rights, their dignity. even if i do not support reformism. i still do not see this as arrogance. someone who is arrogant by definition does not see themselves as equal to others.

As I already tried to explain, we have the same master and we should work on an escape plan.  But you would rather argue over who gets whipped the hardest.  The fact is, state boundaries only exist for the general populace.  Corporations are transnational.  The state has become a tool for them to divide and conquer.



345. Post 3668135 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: BarkinTree on November 21, 2013, 09:55:13 PM
Fine, you're arrogant because you can't stop talking about how much better you are than US citizens Tongue.

You don't know shit about what has happened to our populace and our land.  Corporations and wealthy individuals own everything.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States

BTW, I don't buy the whole capitalist-socialist dichotomy.  Everything is shades of gray, and it is the extremes you have to watch out for.

You seem to want to restrict the term arrogance to what is probably better termed "US exceptionalism".  Yes, this is a form of arrogance, but arrogance can take many forms.
i don't have much of an opinion of u.s. citizens really. but the consensus about them is well established. i also don't buy the capitalist-socialist dichotomy... as it's commonly illustrated.

i think the perceived arrogance of people from the US is much due to US exceptionalism, yes -- i was making that point because that is what non-US folks are exposed to. but i am talking about the dictionary definition of "arrogance".

sure, there is great wealth inequality in the u.s. that doesn't mean there isn't far greater wealth inequality elsewhere, such as in South America. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Gini_Coefficient_World_CIA_Report_2009.svg

it also doesn't speak to the effect of historic exploitation of the southern hemisphere by the north. over 53% of world net worth (based on PPP) is concentrated in North America and Europe, which has less then 15% of world population. when we talk about wealth inequality, surely comparing that of the u.s. with that of that of bolivia is sort of ridiculous, right? are we talking about being entitled to basic human necessities, perhaps education? or are we talking about being entitled to a basic minimum income? or big screen tvs? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_of_wealth

in the u.s., when people complain about entitlements, i hear complaints about people buying big screen tvs with welfare checks. (i take that with grain of salt) surely, you don't think that these are the sort of entitlements that Brazilians seek? that they are arrogant for fighting for? especially given the nature of wealth inequality?

am i arrogant for fighting for a better education system for my children? i must feel so self-important?  Smiley

it's one thing if the state does not exists. it's another thing if the state will exists for the forseeable future, and exploits, and allows exploitation. in the latter case, i think it is only reasonable for people to try to reform the state, to legally prescribe what had once been unwritten -- their ownership, their rights, their dignity. even if i do not support reformism. i still do not see this as arrogance. someone who is arrogant by definition does not see themselves as equal to others.

As I already tried to explain, we have the same master and we should work on an escape plan.  But you would rather argue over who gets whipped the hardest. The fact is, state boundaries only exist for the general populace.  Corporations are transnational.  The state has become a tool for them to divide and conquer.
no, my issue was just with referring to Americans as people from the u.s.  Cheesy  i'd rather not argue over that, but felt it was necessary since your assertions about entitlements (and thus, their relation to "arrogance") are relative to the context of the u.s. and thus have very limited application. part of the issue, also, is that our proposed escape plans are likely quite different.

I never did that.  You assumed I did, and then argued with me about arrogance.  So your issue is with your own misunderstanding that I immediately rebuked before this devolved into a pissing contest.



346. Post 3668170 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: BRADLEYPLOOF on November 21, 2013, 10:00:25 PM
Fine, you're arrogant because you can't stop talking about how much better you are than US citizens Tongue.

You don't know shit about what has happened to our populace and our land.  Corporations and wealthy individuals own everything.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States

BTW, I don't buy the whole capitalist-socialist dichotomy.  Everything is shades of gray, and it is the extremes you have to watch out for.

You seem to want to restrict the term arrogance to what is probably better termed "US exceptionalism".  Yes, this is a form of arrogance, but arrogance can take many forms.
i don't have much of an opinion of u.s. citizens really. but the consensus about them is well established. i also don't buy the capitalist-socialist dichotomy... as it's commonly illustrated.

i think the perceived arrogance of people from the US is much due to US exceptionalism, yes -- i was making that point because that is what non-US folks are exposed to. but i am talking about the dictionary definition of "arrogance".

sure, there is great wealth inequality in the u.s. that doesn't mean there isn't far greater wealth inequality elsewhere, such as in South America. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Gini_Coefficient_World_CIA_Report_2009.svg

it also doesn't speak to the effect of historic exploitation of the southern hemisphere by the north. over 53% of world net worth (based on PPP) is concentrated in North America and Europe, which has less then 15% of world population. when we talk about wealth inequality, surely comparing that of the u.s. with that of that of bolivia is sort of ridiculous, right? are we talking about being entitled to basic human necessities, perhaps education? or are we talking about being entitled to a basic minimum income? or big screen tvs? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_of_wealth

in the u.s., when people complain about entitlements, i hear complaints about people buying big screen tvs with welfare checks. (i take that with grain of salt) surely, you don't think that these are the sort of entitlements that Brazilians seek? that they are arrogant for fighting for? especially given the nature of wealth inequality?

am i arrogant for fighting for a better education system for my children? i must feel so self-important?  Smiley

it's one thing if the state does not exists. it's another thing if the state will exists for the forseeable future, and exploits, and allows exploitation. in the latter case, i think it is only reasonable for people to try to reform the state, to legally prescribe what had once been unwritten -- their ownership, their rights, their dignity. even if i do not support reformism. i still do not see this as arrogance. someone who is arrogant by definition does not see themselves as equal to others.

As I already tried to explain, we have the same master and we should work on an escape plan.  But you would rather argue over who gets whipped the hardest. The fact is, state boundaries only exist for the general populace.  Corporations are transnational.  The state has become a tool for them to divide and conquer.
no, my issue was just with referring to Americans as people from the u.s.  Cheesy  i'd rather not argue over that, but felt it was necessary since your assertions about entitlements (and thus, their relation to "arrogance") are relative to the context of the u.s. and thus have very limited application. part of the issue, also, is that our proposed escape plans are likely quite different.

I never did that.  You assumed I did, and then argued with me about arrogance.

Okay, whaa whaa whaa...take this to some other thread.  We're speculating on bitcoin, not who's panties are in a tighter bunch.  Please, for the love of the flying spaghetti monster, find a different place to play.

Let's quote it more times to complain some.



347. Post 3671491 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: macsga on November 22, 2013, 05:50:29 AM
Hmmm... I see a nice (double) Bottom!!!

Good Morning Fellas!

The bottom fell out.



348. Post 3677992 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Pruden on November 22, 2013, 07:37:45 PM

Sorry if I wasn't clear. f(x) in my example is not e^x

f(x) = 1/(1+e^(-x))

If you raise this function to higher and higher powers, it will look more and more like a step function and have a super-exponential growth phase on a log-chart (in the limit, it will look like a step function on the log chart as well as the linear chart)
I am testing this in fooplot.com but it still looks exponential. A superexponential growth would look like a line curving upwards in the log-chart, and there is nothing like that, only straight lines, steeper with greater exponents, granted.

I agree... the second derivative of ln(f(x)^n) is <= 0 for all x with n >= 0

I other words, the slope will never increase.



349. Post 3693182 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on November 24, 2013, 04:52:53 AM
Square/starbucks rumor? Do tell?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=bitcoin+starbucks+square



350. Post 3700037 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on November 24, 2013, 08:03:02 PM
some might interpret that you're implying that climate change isn't real btw . . . .

The climate is changing, yes, as it always does. The idea that there is some serious crisis going on with man-made climate change is a total sham, however.

Regardless of climate, ocean acidification via CO2 absorption is a serious threat to many marine species... especially tasty ones.



351. Post 3700209 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on November 24, 2013, 08:14:53 PM
some might interpret that you're implying that climate change isn't real btw . . . .

The climate is changing, yes, as it always does. The idea that there is some serious crisis going on with man-made climate change is a total sham, however.

Regardless of climate, ocean acidification via CO2 absorption is a serious threat to many marine species... especially tasty ones.

Perhaps, and I haven't looked into that specifically but I wouldn't be surprised if that was a made-up thing as well. pH regulation should be among the easiest things for nature to handle. Much more difficult is pollutants and overfishing (that is one resource we can run out of, unlike oil). Leave that to Bitcoin. Property rights defined over oceans would end overfishing immediately.

Please do some research, here is a good overview to get you started:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification

Nature does have good pH buffers, but in addition to the direct acidification via carbon,
Quote
CO2 (aq) + H2O <-> H2CO3 <-> HCO3(−) + H(+) <-> CO3(2−) + 2 H(+)
we are also dumping massive amounts of fertilizers and organic waste into our oceans.  This encourages algae blooms that  absorb dissolved oxygen and create more CO2.



352. Post 3700265 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: macsga on November 24, 2013, 08:27:49 PM
some might interpret that you're implying that climate change isn't real btw . . . .

The climate is changing, yes, as it always does. The idea that there is some serious crisis going on with man-made climate change is a total sham, however.

Regardless of climate, ocean acidification via CO2 absorption is a serious threat to many marine species... especially tasty ones.

Perhaps, and I haven't looked into that specifically but I wouldn't be surprised if that was a made-up thing as well. pH regulation should be among the easiest things for nature to handle. Much more difficult is pollutants and overfishing (that is one resource we can run out of, unlike oil). Leave that to Bitcoin. Property rights defined over oceans would end overfishing immediately.
IT IS made up. There's a lot more CO2 produced naturally than artificially. This is a very nice way to get your tax money for their pockets. You can find out more here (and verify with your scientific sources).

http://www.skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions.htm

That's why I hope Bitcoin prevails. I hate those guys.

In the link you provided, the position you are taking is listed as a "climate myth".  The response concludes with
Quote
The level of atmospheric CO2 is building up, the additional CO2 is being produced by burning fossil fuels, and that build up is accelerating.
.



353. Post 3700485 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Sword Smith on November 24, 2013, 08:45:49 PM

That's a strawman, but here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcWkN4ngR2Y

So according to the video:  If we're not running out of resources, why do we need to use them more efficiently?   Roll Eyes  

To deny we are running out of resources, is the true "economic ignorance".  We live in a debt based system that requires infinite growth but our planet and it's resources are certainly finite.  If we had infinite resources, our debt based system could go on forever, but it can't because we don't.  People don't look at what it takes to make that car, that some guy took a loan out on and the bank created money from air to pay for.  This is why our system will eventually collapse because eventually you will run out of the resources required to build the items that people go into debt to buy. Without people taking on more debt, banks can't create more money from thin air and it all comes tumbling down.
ZB is right. It is nice to see someone who understands fundamental economic truths. You can just study BP's Statistical Report if you still think that we are running out of resources. The truth is that known oil reserves are growing faster than oil consumption.

Just because you agree with him, doesn't make him "right".  And your refuting evidence comes from BP?   I'm totally convinced now.  Grin
I don't "agree" with him. I know he is right because I have studied this myself. The R/P ratios (reserves divided by production) rises for many fossile fuels and since the end of the 19th century some people who do not understand economics have been warning about peak oil. Peak oil is a myth but I don't see why we should have a political argument about it.

I agree peak oil is largely overblown since it is essential just decomposed organic matter, but that does not make all resources renewable.  There are still finite limits on many things.



354. Post 3704466 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on November 25, 2013, 05:12:13 AM
Sorry, I don't want to see a mass adoption bubble right now. Too early. I'd rather have 5-figure coins in the future than a mad gold rush now and millions of Chinese losing their shirts in a massive bubble.

I wonder how one slows down a bubble though. We all know when one is forming, but we are more or less powerless to stop it. So what to do?

Play along and get it over with.



355. Post 3711065 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on November 25, 2013, 06:48:06 PM
Take her around the world or something Wink

done that

she does not want to go again, something about airplanes suck, lol

Airplanes do suck.  Take her around the world on boats and trains.  Since we have shit for public transportation in the US, rent a car.  See the world, not just the airports and cities.



356. Post 3724505 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: RooKIED on November 26, 2013, 06:05:31 PM
Gentlemen... fasten your seatbelts cause we're going UP Grin



I don't understand what point you are trying to make with your graph.



357. Post 3724727 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: JustAnotherSheep on November 26, 2013, 06:20:38 PM
I don't understand what point you are trying to make with your graph.
Isn't it obvious? We're going UP

The fight for 900 is over i think. The 900 wall won. He didn't get to sell his coins. Ends up with nothing instead of spreading them out over 900+ and make even more. Well done.
Of course we'll see a 500 sell now followed by panic sheep and we'll be back at 780 within the hour.

 Cheesy
Shit I better start panic selling

But why do you include bitcoin days destroyed.  How is that ever evidence that price will move up?



358. Post 3728179 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 26, 2013, 10:45:18 PM
If you're right, stick to your bets and you'll be vindicated.

Be careful with that.  Sometimes, the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.



359. Post 3745725 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: bnjmnkent on November 28, 2013, 01:51:43 AM
No problem, in North America at least, there has come a tradition of sales on this day and it is one of the busiest shopping days of the year in preparation for the Abrahamic consumption orgy of Christmas
Do you think the black-friday event could mainstream Bitcoin, so that no crash occurs?
Edit: I read about this idea somewhere.

No.  For one, because "the mainsteam" will be shopping in stores.  And for two, because spending bitcoins usually results in a market sell.



360. Post 3747087 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: OldGeek on November 28, 2013, 04:01:30 AM
This is an arena where BTC has the potential to just eat the big banks' lunch for real.

Banks again.  I just read the wiki on M-Pesa and the references to banks were everywhere.  So, I suppose, what btc needs is a clearinghouse.

Noted that IBM was/is involved in the 'Development and second line support' details of M-Pesa.  Shouldn't be too long before we hear something from that powerhouse inre bitcoin.

/Frank

Bitcoin mining is the clearing house for transactions.



361. Post 3747622 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Voodah on November 28, 2013, 06:08:59 AM
well, a hard fork is a change in protocol that splits it into two protocols. 0.7 guys wont accept the blocks of 0.8 guys, creating two different blockchains. not very encouraging, and in my opinion not related to price.

Exactly, which is why this guy's posts seem to make no sense. I think he was hit by the troll box.

Quote
Hard-fork possible motives:

+ An incorrect (=not identical to the rest of the network) implementation forks off. In this case it will always certainly be clear who is "at fault". For example, in the 0.7 vs 0.8 fork, there was a bug in the 0.7 (and older) clients that limited them in an unknown way, but 0.8 was at fault for not correctly mimicking the bug. As keeping such a weird and inconsistent limitation would hold the network back, and be risky in itself, the bug-free behavior will become allowed after may 15. However, if old full clients remain on the network after that date, they will end up on a fork, and this fork will not resolve.

+ Two implementations arise that knowingly implement different rules, perhaps because of ideological disagreement about what the rules should be. If both are economically significant and have significant mining behind them (which in neither case necessarily means a near-majority), this is pretty much a disaster. The incentive for consensus is huge, as disagreement effectively means granting every old coin hold to spend it once on each side.

What is it that you guys don't understand?

It may be accidental (due to much sudden hashing power on alts) or intentional (to cause price crashes). Who knows..??


If there was a hard fork it wouldn't be hard to figure out what was going on.  Are you sure there isn't just a surge of hashpower causing more orphans?  Can you provide any sources that describe what you think is happening?



362. Post 3762109 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: OldGeek on November 29, 2013, 05:50:02 AM
That oughta make headlines tomorrow.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-11-29/bitcoin-now-worth-more-gold



363. Post 3762326 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: vps15 on November 29, 2013, 06:36:55 AM



look im just saying, the only reason why people think btc can go to $10000 is because if enough people start using it so much that it becomes accepted everywhere, such that the only reason why it would be worth $10000 per BTC is because fiat would become essentially redundant or worthless.  With another huge Chinese company, especially a state owned one, shows that this can happen sooner than people expect.

basically fuck the speculators, fuck the greedy assholes that think it can just be a get rich quick scheme and dont fully understand btc.  The move to $10000 is irrelevant of them.  what will get us to $10000 is real people converting their fiat because btc is better

(ps i know this has been said before but your comment suggests that you dont understand the way to $10000)

Utter shite.

If gold can be worth 7 trillion without anyone spending it, Bitcoin can be worth 500 billion without anyone spending it.

Repeat after me. Bitcoin is a new asset class.

mate if you are such a bear and have no hope for btc then why are you even here

I can't figure out who you are talking to.  Both people you quoted made bullish statements.



364. Post 3766638 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: ajax3592 on November 29, 2013, 02:36:04 PM
What secret code lies beneath 1337? Would any one tell me

Elite -> leet -> 1337



365. Post 3767075 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on November 29, 2013, 03:15:40 PM
So with the "get rich quick" schemers on board is that a bullish sign or a bearish sign?  Huh

First one, then the other.



366. Post 3775140 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: beetcoin on November 30, 2013, 03:50:25 AM
all we need is just for a major retailer to jump in the pool. that'll start the singularity of the next phase (whatever it is). most investments would be speculation, but it would at the same time make bitcoin a legitimate world currency.
What's going to happen is that first exporters are going to start insisting on payment in Bitcoin instead of Dollars.

Then the retailers will get onboard by necessity.

there is more reason, at least for me, to believe that bitcoin will be accepted by a major retailer.. we're already hearing tons of chatter about ebay/newegg/amazon/tigerdirect accepting BTC.

btw, what is the reason why exporters would want to transact with btc vs.the dollar? my angle with retailers, transactions would cost them significantly less than dealing with paypal/visa or whatever the establishment is. if the retailers could recoup 99% of their revenues vs. 98% (with the status quo 3rd parties).. it would be a huge paradigm shift since retailers make such small margins that 1% would be insane.

Do you think international money transfers and currency conversions are any cheaper than visa transactions?



367. Post 3776595 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 30, 2013, 07:21:46 AM
This is how these "dumps" have me feeling lately...



Lol



368. Post 3780753 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on November 30, 2013, 03:04:31 PM
I wonder if the 0% trading fees at the largest exchanges (china & gox) is contributing to this misleading stability.

wouldn't it be more likely to cause instability greater swing trade gains


Can you explain by what mechanism that could possibly work?  My experience and several academic papers would disagree with you.

For example: http://m.rfs.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/11/3389.short

Quote
Competition among trading platforms has considerably reduced trading fees in stock markets. We show that this evolution is not necessarily beneficial to investors. Although they increase gains from trade when a trade happens, lower trading costs can induce investors to post limit orders with a smaller execution probability. In this case, gains from trade are realized less frequently and investors can be worse off.

In other words, lower fees leads to a full book and thus more stability.



369. Post 3780895 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on November 30, 2013, 03:26:06 PM
I wonder if the 0% trading fees at the largest exchanges (china & gox) is contributing to this misleading stability.

wouldn't it be more likely to cause instability greater swing trade gains


Can you explain by what mechanism that could possibly work?  My experience and several academic papers would disagree with you.

For example: http://m.rfs.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/11/3389.short

Quote
Competition among trading platforms has considerably reduced trading fees in stock markets. We show that this evolution is not necessarily beneficial to investors. Although they increase gains from trade when a trade happens, lower trading costs can induce investors to post limit orders with a smaller execution probability. In this case, gains from trade are realized less frequently and investors can be worse off.

In other words, lower fees leads to a full book and thus more stability.

I thought because it was a break..from them not necessarily permanently 0% trading fees you'd see more variance.. pretty much what we saw when the bots weren't configured for it, Thursday.

Gox that is
I wasn't watching much on Thursday because I live in the US (Thanksgiving holliday).  However, in the past temporary 0 fees on gox has generally led to more stability.

So if I understand correctly, you are saying that people will rush to trade since the fees will be going back up?  There may be some truth to that, but the book will still be thicker, especially close to the price.



370. Post 3781107 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: vps15 on November 30, 2013, 03:44:54 PM
I wonder if the 0% trading fees at the largest exchanges (china & gox) is contributing to this misleading stability.

wouldn't it be more likely to cause instability greater swing trade gains


Can you explain by what mechanism that could possibly work?  My experience and several academic papers would disagree with you.

For example: http://m.rfs.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/11/3389.short

Quote
Competition among trading platforms has considerably reduced trading fees in stock markets. We show that this evolution is not necessarily beneficial to investors. Although they increase gains from trade when a trade happens, lower trading costs can induce investors to post limit orders with a smaller execution probability. In this case, gains from trade are realized less frequently and investors can be worse off.

In other words, lower fees leads to a full book and thus more stability.

I thought because it was a break..from them not necessarily permanently 0% trading fees you'd see more variance.. pretty much what we saw when the bots weren't configured for it, Thursday.

Gox that is
I wasn't watching much on Thursday because I live in the US (Thanksgiving holliday).  However, in the past temporary 0 fees on gox has generally led to more stability.

So if I understand correctly, you are saying that people will rush to trade since the fees will be going back up?  There may be some truth to that, but the book will still be thicker, especially close to the price.

gox should have mentioned 0 fees earlier, the earliest i heard of this was today in an email from them (i guess like everybody else), one day after it's already started.  if they had made it more public i expect there would have been massive fluctuations as people who want to get in would be that much more inclined to buy given that they would have gained an extra 0.6% btc, and the opposite goes for traders that want to get out (gaining 0.6% more fiat).

this is common sense, expect volatility
Your "common sense" contradicts my experience.  Also, the email in my inbox is dated 11-28.



371. Post 3781628 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: vps15 on November 30, 2013, 04:28:05 PM

gox should have mentioned 0 fees earlier, the earliest i heard of this was today in an email from them (i guess like everybody else), one day after it's already started.  if they had made it more public i expect there would have been massive fluctuations as people who want to get in would be that much more inclined to buy given that they would have gained an extra 0.6% btc, and the opposite goes for traders that want to get out (gaining 0.6% more fiat).

this is common sense, expect volatility
Your "common sense" contradicts my experience.  Also, the email in my inbox is dated 11-28.

well ya bitcoin is unpredictable, so just because something should happen doesnt mean it will,

but do you agree with what im saying? lower fees means more profitable transactions, gives people more incentive to trade

I disagree because most trades are not people actually moving from fiat to btc or back.  Most trades are traders and market makers.

Just compare trade volume with order book depletion.  Much of the time, a new bid or ask is placed when a trade executes.



372. Post 3791155 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: beetcoin on December 01, 2013, 09:05:55 AM
Nah I don't think he is either, I just mean someone with some money to spare saw an opportunity to manipulate the media and they capitalized. Not exactly ethical, and if the media does any research (I know, laughable), they might reveal the news as such. That'd play into their "pump & dump" rhetoric quite nicely.

I agree. On one hand, no matter what the motives behind these donations were, the kid did receive a CRAZY amount of money for nothing and that alone is perfect material for a news story.

i should follow the local news van around, and wait for the cameras to start rolling. then i'll run across the screen naked, shouting "i love bitcooooooooin."

Paint a QR code on your chest first



373. Post 3824477 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Wow... People here are so gullible.



374. Post 3957410 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 14, 2013, 02:11:46 AM
Bill gates didn't get rich by selling his own stock, he was the biggest holder of MS.
yes he did... he just knew the right time to sell...
that BS.

he got rich by buying his own stock.

?


So all his fiat came from income?

No man, he has sold way more in terms of fiat than he bought... like magnitudes more.


He got rich cuz he sold at the right time...


Edit: Am i being trolled?

he sold right after win98 crashed while he was doing the demo?

your missing the point...

No, he sold right before it "crashed" Wink



375. Post 4021438 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbrjRKB586s



376. Post 4069553 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: Xiaoxiao on December 21, 2013, 07:06:00 AM
now we go down

Now the pigs get slaughtered.



377. Post 4132967 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.46h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 25, 2013, 06:52:23 AM
r/bitcoin – 89,324 readers; 750 users here now

r/litecoin – 15,588; ~80

r/dogecoin – 15,085; 655

How funny is that? 2014 will clearly be the year of the Shiba Inu. Look at all the hype it's generat-err digging.

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

And look at my wallet!  Over 6k coins in a few days with a single GPU.  How could they not be valuable! Roll Eyes



378. Post 4133155 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.46h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 25, 2013, 06:56:01 AM
I've 0 of any scamcoin (except for Bitcoin, obviously), but Dogecoin is absolutely hilarious and you would be a fool to deny it. Cheesy

I agree it's halarious.  Warming my feet wasn't the only reason I kicked my GPU on.



379. Post 4165573 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

Quote from: TERA on December 27, 2013, 08:21:31 AM
It's been a rough day hodling. I spent all those other days not hodling through half the rises and finally now that I hodl it does this.

If sometimes you spend days "not hodling", you aren't a hodler.

Quit trying to predict the short term fluctuations, it's bad for your wallet.dat.



380. Post 4181953 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

Quote from: gizmoh on December 28, 2013, 07:39:59 AM
I may regret this in the morning, as it will cause some people to want to trade against me, but I feel that I need to put it out there. Bitcoin TA is heavily manipulated at the moment, by at least 2 parties. Be careful out there.

Like the new wall of 1800 btc at 740 on Gox..
Why would one put such wall at that price if not to try support the price..

To encourage front running bids you can sell into before you pull your wall lower.  I'm not suggesting that is what is happening here since I'm not really watching the market tonight, but sometimes that is the motive.



381. Post 4197271 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.48h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 29, 2013, 05:04:43 AM
For all those even THINKING about "investing" in scamcoins: Don't forget that ultimately, there will only be ONE coin of each hashing algorithm because of the natural concentration of hashing power and the threat of 51% attacks.

Perhaps doge will be the scrypt one. It will certainly be hilarious to watch blight fight dogshit.

Why not merged mining?  A single chain doesn't scale as well as multiple chains.



382. Post 4197803 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.48h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 29, 2013, 05:13:20 AM
Even though I've always been curious about the smell of dogshit, I just could never bring myself to try it.

Perhaps it is my realization that if not one wins, then ultimately, all will lose. Why even bother? Or perhaps I'm just too old school.

For all those even THINKING about "investing" in scamcoins: Don't forget that ultimately, there will only be ONE coin of each hashing algorithm because of the natural concentration of hashing power and the threat of 51% attacks.

Perhaps doge will be the scrypt one. It will certainly be hilarious to watch blight fight dogshit.

Why not merged mining?  A single chain doesn't scale as well as multiple chains.
Isn't Namecoin merged nowadays? It's the only altcoin I've ever dabbled in.

Don't you see the irony in demanding that decentralized currencies be centralized into a single chain?

Namecoin, devcoin, and ixcoin are all actively merge mined with bitcoin.  There may be others.  I don't know of any scrypt merged mining efforts at the moment, but I haven't dealt much with scrypt mining.



383. Post 4197960 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.48h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 29, 2013, 06:30:47 AM
How much hashing power does Namecoin have? I'm guessing that even though it is "free" after setting it up, few miners do it. Figures on the other ones with merged mining (SHA256) would be interesting too.

Also, I don't know for sure what you are trying to tell me anymore. I guess you are saying that merged mining can allow coins of the same hashing algorithm to coexist?

Googling namecoin difficulty looks like it should give you the answer, but the first two links I tried were not mobile phone friendly.  Most pools handle merged mining, and it is dead simple to set up on p2pool.  Solo mining would be more difficult, unless you just made your own p2pool chain and used that.

And yes, you got my point exactly.  The hash power can secure all chains at once, within the constraints of the coinbase (you have to add a hash to the coinbase for each coin a particular miner is merged mining, so you need room for all of those).



384. Post 4207656 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.48h):

Quote from: Sitarow on December 29, 2013, 08:05:38 PM


Choo choo



385. Post 4241703 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.49h):

Quote from: aminorex on December 31, 2013, 03:32:51 PM
More merchants make for more money flow.  So yes It is bullish, even if you disagree.
A merchant converting to fiat does not reduce that flow, it just doesn't add to it as much as when the merchant uses it in their supply chain.  Then it increases the flow further.  It is a difference between a +1 and a +2 not the difference between a 0 and a +1.

The relevant equation for valuation is PQ = MV.  Learn it, love it, live it.  To determine the value of the money supply (the circulating funds, not the total theoretical supply, thank you Gresham) M=PQ/V.  The higher the velocity of money, the lower the value of each monetary unit.  The intuitive explanation is that the more things you can buy with a unit, the less the unit is worth.  Re-using the same unit means that it buys more stuff.  Of course this is only true once money velocity achieves orbit, but after that it is certainly and always true.  It is similar to the ideal gas law in that respect (and in many other respects).


My intuition about M=PQ/V disagrees with your characterization.

The higher V, the smaller M (the total money supply).  Smaller M means less money in circulation, means each individual unit is more valuable.

Of course, you can't just change V and keep PQ constant, so it's pretty much just an academic exercise to consider.



386. Post 4259837 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.49h):

A few things about p2pool.  First, you don't have to run a node to mine on p2pool.  You can connect to one of hundreds of public nodes.  As long as you use your address as your username, you will get paid out.  You can even fall back to other p2pool nodes with the same address and keep mining if a node goes down.  The node can have a fee, but there are plenty of low fee or free ones available.  Running your own node locally can reduce your latency and thus lower your stale shares, but you suffer the same issue with a centralized pool.

That said, the issue with p2pool is that you have to be able to get a share within the 24 hour payout window.  At the moment it takes around 44 GH/s to average 1 share/24 hours.  I believe this can be solved with tiered share-chains and m-of-n addresses, but there are some sticky issues.  Basically, 100 lower difficulty sharechains are formed where all participants on a given chain mine to the same p2pool address (the sharechain address), but they also encode their individual address in the block.  The sharechain address is an m-of-n address that requires a portion of the individual addresses in the recent chain to spend.  When the sharechain address receives a payout, sharechain participants send out their signatures for a transaction to spend the payout to the individual miners.  Of course, there may need to be some accumulation allowed so that minimum payout levels can be instituted to avoid spamming dust, which is where it gets sticky since we need to ensure they are spendable.  Bitcoin blocks currently couldn't support paying out each miner with every block (which would be the case if we had everyone on p2pool and set the payout window long enough so the smallest miner could have reasonable variance).  But it's tough because we need to ensure that the accumulated btc can be spent and micro-p2pool nodes with the keys might disappear, so finding the right m and n may be tricky.  Also, the sharechain address will have to change as the individual miner addresses change.

Like I said, it's sticky, especially with the 1MB blocksize limit.



387. Post 4259956 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.49h):

Quote from: Voodah on January 01, 2014, 09:38:40 PM
Though it's not much of a competition when one side is producing a profit and the other is literally throwing money away.  

Could you expand on this?

Are they not covering the 0% fee costs with the crazy GH's price and the fee's over at Cex.io?
Is it truly your belief, that they are not making money out of their whole scheme?

Are they not the same organization?
Is it known who the owners are?


Do they payout merge mined coins?  If not, perhaps they are merge mining and paying their expenses with those.



388. Post 4328443 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 05, 2014, 04:52:18 PM
What happened to the usual weekend dip? I tried to day trade it and now I'm stuck in worthless depreciating fiat. Good thing it was only one coin, one I bought for $17.00  ;-)

You've been around long enough that you should know not to do that unless we have been trending down for the week already.  In other cases it is too risky precisely because people do it anyway.  Bulls know this and will ramp it on the weekends when they have control.



389. Post 4328943 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on January 05, 2014, 05:31:29 PM
What happened to the usual weekend dip? I tried to day trade it and now I'm stuck in worthless depreciating fiat. Good thing it was only one coin, one I bought for $17.00  ;-)

You've been around long enough that you should know not to do that unless we have been trending down for the week already.  In other cases it is too risky precisely because people do it anyway.  Bulls know this and will ramp it on the weekends when they have control.

I guess I'm too much of a contrarian. I bought that coin on the way down from $31 in 2011 (along with a few others). I was selling the whole ramp up from $350 to $1200 and buying back on the way down. My biggest mistake was taking my profits in fiat instead of BTC. Stupid dollars. What am I supposed to do with those? Wipe my butt?

Exactly.  Any fool could have made USD profits in this market the past couple years.  If you can't increase your btc, don't trade unless you need fiat or are looking to exit the market.



390. Post 4329346 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: jojo69 on January 05, 2014, 05:52:49 PM
golly, would ya look at that

http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2014-01-05/future-money-here-zero-trust-digital-currency-contracts

The only thing missing is the one thing I wanted to know as soon as I saw what he made: what are the rules for verifying price quotes and how can we trust the sources not to manipulate the signal for their own gain?

If you can solve that problem, you're golden.



391. Post 4329497 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on January 05, 2014, 06:06:35 PM

The only thing missing is the one thing I wanted to know as soon as I saw what he made: what are the rules for verifying price quotes and how can we trust the sources not to manipulate the signal for their own gain?

If you can solve that problem, you're golden.

lol that's already part of the ripple protocol

I see issues with Ripple's solution.



392. Post 4380704 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Quote from: Peter R on January 08, 2014, 04:40:06 AM
^ Negative commissions for market makers.  I don't understand exactly how that will work, but it sounds innovative.  Reminds me of the investor option at just-dice.com to bankroll the casino (and thus share in the profits). 

Bitcoin seems to promote this idea of "equal-opportunity" between peers in a market-driven manner that I really like (just-dice.com investors, bitfinex lenders, BTC-china market makers). 

This is known as maker-taker.

http://www.marketswiki.com/mwiki/Maker-taker



393. Post 4399515 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Quote from: TERA on January 09, 2014, 12:53:17 AM
Hey Bitcoin gods. I'm doing the longest time thing and all. But I'd like to get filthy rich tonight, so would you mind hurrying up Grin

You'll have to w8 a bit , the guys in rpietila lounge are talking about a drop to 500 =))))

The girls aren't though.  Grin  I don't think we will ever see 500 again!  Even BitChicksHusband thinks I am overly bullish and a little too exuberant at times so keep that in mind.  I could be totally wrong.
It would be really easy to see 500- again if something else happens in china and huobi starts going down or the Chinese exchanges get shut down. Basically all the exchanges are still slaves to the huobi manipulation and without it there is no real support. The order books and volume are a joke - so tiny compared to earlier last year before china. When the shit really hits the fan in china then its game on.

Bids are at an all time high in dollar terms on gox:



394. Post 4423966 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on January 10, 2014, 06:17:23 AM
time to test support levels is it ?

yes

and

i'm ready, i was born ready!

What is your target @ stamp adam ?

i start buying at 700, i go ape shit at 650

Thats it? You think we have resistance at 700 to 650?

I was thinking closer to 550.

I wish you luck sir.  Don't miss the train.



395. Post 4424038 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

DCA is the best way to grow a stash.  Trying to pick bottoms is the best way to shrink a stash.



396. Post 4424219 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: OldGeek on January 10, 2014, 06:27:22 AM
I wish you luck sir.  Don't miss the train.

I take that as a rather bullish statement.  Do you have any particulars that you would share here?

DCA means...?

Take your pick: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DCA

Hint: Other Uses

And, nothing in particular, just a mixture of chart gazing with my favorite indicators at lots of time frames across several exchanges, my daily scans of this forum guaging fundamentals and sentiment, and of course, my mood plays a role whether I want it to or not.  Oh, and I first missed the train when it hit $3.  That was three times what I was going to make at $1, and I was already doubling my hardware investment at $1.  It had to come back down and I could easily get more coins.  It didn't come back down until after $32, and was only that low again for a brief window many months later.  I don't ever again want to be faced with selling more than a tiny % and having to decide between holding fiat for months and hoping for a small window of opportunity or just taking the fiat and hope I can DCA my way back to an acceptable stash.  I still trade, quite profitably, but only with a small portion.  That way, I keep my stress low and can make good decisions.



397. Post 4437842 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: macsga on January 10, 2014, 10:17:35 PM

WTF??!!





398. Post 4442750 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

So I need $913 on coinbase to afford my o.co order with the BTC on my phone.  Make it happen people! Tongue



399. Post 4443196 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: arepo on January 11, 2014, 05:44:33 AM
we need to see some serious volume either tonight or early morning tomorrow or this "bullish" breakout is looking very bearish indeed...

I'm starting to think you're right.... Now what to drop from the shopping cart?  The iClebo robotic vacuum, the kitchenaid mixer, or the breville oven?

Or do I wait until tomorrow and hope for the whole lot? ($913 coinbase)

Unhodling is hard.



400. Post 4469048 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 12, 2014, 06:03:47 PM

the plunge is coming, everyone must make the pledge!



its now or never lemmings.

They need some encouragement to actually make the leap:
Quote
A Canadian Broadcasting Corporation documentary, Cruel Camera, found the lemmings used for White Wilderness were flown from Hudson Bay to Calgary, Alberta, Canada, where they did not jump off the cliff, but were in fact launched off the cliff using a turntable.



401. Post 4478829 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: traderCJ on January 13, 2014, 04:13:16 AM
Cross post, because: brilliant.

Immediately converting bitcoin through a payment processor is not "accepting bitcoin." It is accepting fiat, both functionally and literally.

Newegg and Overstock are irrelevant.

You idiots.

Correct they accept fiat and allow bitcoin users to ay with their bitcoin. I think it is pretty awesome that they would completely adjust their accepted payment methods to include the bitcoin community.

You are a stupid person and have missed the point.

Awe cute. Instead of positing an intelligent response you just resort to name calling. I never knew you were still in middle school and had limited intelligence. This explains a lot.

What would be the point of an intelligent response when the first statement I made was so easy to understand?

You idiot.

As I stated in the other thread, your point is incorrect.  People converting USD -> BTC, transferring to retailer, then retailer converting BTC -> USD will result in a price increase when spread across an ever-increasing user-base.  Use of a currency forces its price to increase.  Basic economics.

Unless there are early adopters sitting on millions in profits waiting for places to spend them.



402. Post 4479119 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 13, 2014, 04:34:56 AM
like the several hundred articles we get from the western press every single week.
The point is that the Chinese press is insisting on the Ponzi aspect.  If that is the government position, Bitcoin trading may become illegal in China.

(Bitcoin may have good intentions, but trading it is a zero-sum game, whether it blooms or collapses.  One man's proft is necessarily another man's loss.)

Except bitcoin is not only useful for currency exchange, it can also be used to trade for goods and services.  For this use, it is faster and cheaper to transact in than credit/debit cards.



403. Post 4491066 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 13, 2014, 07:25:39 PM
is everyone is high on drugs!?

Not at the moment.



404. Post 4491128 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 13, 2014, 07:27:50 PM
is everyone is high on drugs!?

Yep, caffeine and sucrose here.

I try to avoid those.



405. Post 4494982 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: molecular on January 13, 2014, 08:15:09 PM
the bearishness can you feel it?  Cheesy

I can feel it, yes.

I almost sold in panic at the recent bottom. Might be a sign the bottom is in, but the panic was still manageable, so maybe we have some ways to go yet.

??!??!??!??

lol

maybe I should clarify: When I say "I sell", I really mean: sell my trading stash (or part thereof), which is about 5% of my coins.

So I never sell more than 5%.

EDIT: although I've been trying to change that as per rpietilas divestment strategy... but it's hard.


Just "divest" into your trading fund.  You'll end up with fiat soon enough.



406. Post 4509661 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: pietje on January 14, 2014, 05:10:49 PM
i panic sold once and i felt so dumb that i've adopted the strict HODL policy and it's been working out for me so far

you guys should try it out too

I've moved to a pure SODL strategy, since we're clearly heading to zero.

Why are you still here when you think we are going to zero?

Just as the Chinese government has recently warned citizens of the dangers of bitcoin, I am warning citizens of bitcointalk of the dangers of bitcoins, to help as many people as possible.  Only Satoshi and maybe 2 or 3 other people will make any money from bitcoin.  Everyone else will lose money, and probably destroy their life, as the Chinese government has explained.

Alot of ppl already made profits and even if it goes down to 0, they still do.
For the rest ur just posting crap news and stuff which are for 90% not even true. Really makes me wonder why ur here..
My best guess one of the few bears who are still waiting for the final drop from the 1200 crash. See you at $10k

I assume you are human, so we can safely assume that your best guess is terrible since you have practically no information to make a good guess.

Proudhon is trolling because he, like the rest of us have become annoyed at the constant panic mode of all the new traders.  It has become a bit of a joke for us because mocking it and laughing is better than getting annoyed.  It also shuts down the fudmeisters and before they know it, they are looking at the back of the train.  Lessons will be learned and the new traders now will join in the games next time around.  The forums will again be flooded with new traders if we rocket and once there are too many who need to learn the lessons of chasing the newsfeeds(which, hint you are the product, not the customer unless you are paying for it), we will top and teach them once more.



407. Post 4509799 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on January 14, 2014, 05:45:48 PM

This is big govt vs big telco.
Telco wins.
Probably a good thing for people and companies that use their networks.

MPLS QoS means that things that need real-time responsiveness can get it, so your skype call doesn't get choppy when your email attachment is coming across.
Not the end of the world, and likely a good thing for progress.

It's a good thing, so long as we can control these parameters ourselves.  If I want to prioritize things differently then I should be able to.  In fact, I could already.  This is the telecos wanting to take over prioritization in the name of optimizing their networks.  Of course it is technically trivial to just ignore user priorities, but until now it was thought to be against antitrust regulations because it enables, for example Comcast, to prioritize NBC's content (which they own), and deprioritize Fox's content.  Other networks might deprioritize NBC to harm Comcast.  This is a surrender of freedom.



408. Post 4512601 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on January 14, 2014, 07:37:03 PM

This is big govt vs big telco.
Telco wins.
Probably a good thing for people and companies that use their networks.

MPLS QoS means that things that need real-time responsiveness can get it, so your skype call doesn't get choppy when your email attachment is coming across.
Not the end of the world, and likely a good thing for progress.

It's a good thing, so long as we can control these parameters ourselves.  If I want to prioritize things differently then I should be able to.  In fact, I could already.  This is the telecos wanting to take over prioritization in the name of optimizing their networks.  Of course it is technically trivial to just ignore user priorities, but until now it was thought to be against antitrust regulations because it enables, for example Comcast, to prioritize NBC's content (which they own), and deprioritize Fox's content.  Other networks might deprioritize NBC to harm Comcast.  This is a surrender of freedom.

By ourselves, you mean free to buy network connections as you like, or be prevented by government from these being made available.
I buy "business accounts" from my telco and do my own prioritization.  Large companies pay for QoS prioritization and love it for the last 20 years, finally consumers can get a taste of it.
 
For most people they won't care, won't notice.
The things you are afraid of (NBC vs Cox) are already illegal under other laws in most jurisdictions (oops, sorry Italy) and are not an issue here (in the USA where this particular legal battle is fought).

If you really want to worry about something in regards to this, your radar is seeing only the media chaff, while the missile sails right through.
The operation of packet inspection for prioritization contains metadata that could ultimately be seized or subpoena and provide a deeper intrusion to privacy by TPTB.
This can show what protocols each of us are running on our networks, and that may be far more interesting than the prosaic notion of whether the ads and services you are getting are for the company from whom you are buying a network.

Think deeper.

Deep packet inspection by ISPs has been going on for at least a decade.  They never needed priority as an excuse.  But keep on cheering for more centralized control of our networks.  Soon all my traffic will be encrypted on Comcast's network.



409. Post 4513141 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on January 14, 2014, 08:32:59 PM

This is big govt vs big telco.
Telco wins.
Probably a good thing for people and companies that use their networks.

MPLS QoS means that things that need real-time responsiveness can get it, so your skype call doesn't get choppy when your email attachment is coming across.
Not the end of the world, and likely a good thing for progress.

It's a good thing, so long as we can control these parameters ourselves.  If I want to prioritize things differently then I should be able to.  In fact, I could already.  This is the telecos wanting to take over prioritization in the name of optimizing their networks.  Of course it is technically trivial to just ignore user priorities, but until now it was thought to be against antitrust regulations because it enables, for example Comcast, to prioritize NBC's content (which they own), and deprioritize Fox's content.  Other networks might deprioritize NBC to harm Comcast.  This is a surrender of freedom.

By ourselves, you mean free to buy network connections as you like, or be prevented by government from these being made available.
I buy "business accounts" from my telco and do my own prioritization.  Large companies pay for QoS prioritization and love it for the last 20 years, finally consumers can get a taste of it.
 
For most people they won't care, won't notice.
The things you are afraid of (NBC vs Cox) are already illegal under other laws in most jurisdictions (oops, sorry Italy) and are not an issue here (in the USA where this particular legal battle is fought).

If you really want to worry about something in regards to this, your radar is seeing only the media chaff, while the missile sails right through.
The operation of packet inspection for prioritization contains metadata that could ultimately be seized or subpoena and provide a deeper intrusion to privacy by TPTB.
This can show what protocols each of us are running on our networks, and that may be far more interesting than the prosaic notion of whether the ads and services you are getting are for the company from whom you are buying a network.

Think deeper.

Deep packet inspection by ISPs has been going on for at least a decade.  They never needed priority as an excuse.  But keep on cheering for more centralized control of our networks.

If you remember your history, all networks were controlled by government.  All the PTTs...
The increase of shifting of control from government to private enterprise is less "centralization" not more.

Excluding broadband internet from common carrier regulations keeps completion out of the industry.  With copper lines, which do fall under common carrier, you provider has to provide you with the contracted bandwidth and you are free to resell it if you wish.  Broadband providers do not have to follow these rules.  I just moved into an apartment and I am having a terrible time dealing with Comcast just to get simple fucking internet (it's been over a week since I moved in).  If I had any other options for broadband, I would love to give them my business.  But regional monopolies dominate and even when demand is strong competitors can't get a foot in the door by buying from the monopoly provider.  Networks are expensive to build and maintain, which is why centralization is such a strong force in these industries.  Common carrier regulations were put in place to help balance this tendency and promote competition.  If a stronger Comcast is so great, why am I typing this on my phone when I have a really nice desktop?



410. Post 4517376 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on January 14, 2014, 09:07:37 PM
Excluding broadband internet from common carrier regulations keeps completion out of the industry.  With copper lines, which do fall under common carrier, you provider has to provide you with the contracted bandwidth and you are free to resell it if you wish.  Broadband providers do not have to follow these rules.  I just moved into an apartment and I am having a terrible time dealing with Comcast just to get simple fucking internet (it's been over a week since I moved in).  If I had any other options for broadband, I would love to give them my business.  But regional monopolies dominate and even when demand is strong competitors can't get a foot in the door by buying from the monopoly provider.  Networks are expensive to build and maintain, which is why centralization is such a strong force in these industries.  Common carrier regulations were put in place to help balance this tendency and promote competition.  If a stronger Comcast is so great, why am I typing this on my phone when I have a really nice desktop?

Because bitcoin.

The internet is fundamentally broken in part precisely because it doesn't include any economic protocol until now.
There are a great many tragedies of the commons that occur from this: spam, pervasive advertising, all you can download/upload pricing, that you even have to pay for it at all if you are getting just basic internet is a symptom.
Letting the providers use the available technology to solve some of these problems is not such a bad thing.

There will always be folks that just enjoy using law to stop technology, but that doesn't make it better.

For your particulars, I don't know where you are, but I've never lived in a location that had so few choices for network.  My priorities are likely different as I wouldn't have considered living in a place without more choices.  If it doesn't have cable + DSL + wireless + nearby fiber + satellite availability, for myself, it could at best be a vacation rental.  Certainly not a place I could live / work.  
Your vote with your rental payment has more sway than the ballot box.

"Just leave" is a poor solution, especially when I am in one of the most population dense areas in my state.  I probably am moving elsewhere when I finish my degree, but that won't help the millions of people that have no option to but to live with the situation (most people in my state are too poor to even think about moving).  Ultimately lack of population density is the main problem, but at least with common carrier lines there was the possibility of smaller fish focusing on service to clean up the scraps left by the whales.  Without such options, I am currently a scrap that can only access the internet though my phone or by visiting a friend.



411. Post 4517426 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on January 14, 2014, 10:30:32 PM
Deep packet inspection by ISPs has been going on for at least a decade.  They never needed priority as an excuse.  But keep on cheering for more centralized control of our networks.  Soon all my traffic will be encrypted on Comcast's network.

Sure it happens, but it is relatively rare and expensive to do pervasively, even in places where the government claims the authority and is uncontested to do it at will, it is still relatively rare.
Putting this financial incentive in front of it will ease the burden making it more common.
When we brought our new shiny QoS high speed ATM and MPLS switches into China, knowing what to say, and what not to say, and to whom, remained important.
Comcast has been injecting shit into unencrypted web pages since at least 2008.  Not only are they reading the application protocol to do this, they are modifying the data.  And why do you think it is expensive?  They have the data and they have code to read the protocols.  They can trivially extract anything they want that isn't encrypted.



412. Post 4518994 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 15, 2014, 01:34:53 AM
One of these plots is actual hourly closing price (USD/BTC) from one exchange, the other is a series of fake prices generated by a simple "log-Brownian" model.

Can you tell which is which, without looking at other charts?
If you think you can, what difference do you see?

Honestly, they both look very plausible. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if they're both BTC/USD, but from different exchanges.

The red line (Y) is Bitstamp's hourly closing price from 2014-01-05 to 2014-01-13.

The blue line (X) is generated by starting with

  X(0) = 840
  Z(0) = log_10(X(0)),

then, for i = 1,2,...

  Z(i) = Z(i-1) + 0.058*RND(),
  X(i)  = 10^Z(i)

where RND() is a random number with normal distribution, mean 0 and standard deviation 1.

In simple words, the simulated price X(i) increases or decreases at each step by a random percentage, without regard for the past history.

I had to try twice, with different random generator's seeds; on my first attempt the simulated price dropped too low at one point, it would have been a dead giveaway.

Granted it is only one sample, I picked blue as the fake data right away.



413. Post 4519111 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 15, 2014, 03:48:31 AM
Granted it is only one sample, I picked blue as the fake data right away.
Good. Can you tell what looked "wrong" with that one?


Brownian motion follows a normal distribution.  Price changes follow a power law distribution with clustering of high standard deviation data points.



414. Post 4521266 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 15, 2014, 04:10:26 AM
Granted it is only one sample, I picked blue as the fake data right away.
Good. Can you tell what looked "wrong" with that one?


Brownian motion follows a normal distribution.  Price changes follow a power law distribution with clustering of high standard deviation data points.
Indeed, in other time intervals and other scales it is quite visible that the amplitude of the "random" component (the price changes) varies over a scale of tens of hours, so that there are "steadier days" and "wilder days".  That should account for "clustering of high standard deviation data points".

In that interval, in particular, the red curve has larger deviations in the first half, smaller in the middle (from ~120 to ~150) and then intermediate ones near the end.

However, that effect seems to be rather subtle.  Perhaps it was the non-normal distribution of the changes that made the red curve look different?


http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0465043577

^ What I'm currently reading.  But from what I understand, the derivative of price does not follow a normal distribution.  There are far too many data points with high standard deviations.  Instead you need a distribution with so-called fat tails.



415. Post 4528539 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: The Bitcoin Foundation on January 15, 2014, 04:35:25 PM


If you sell here do not lose sleep of being left behind

I encourage anyone to look at the weekly chart. I have looked at ever bubble pop / crash / bounce since the beginning and have noticed that anyone you sells above the 7 week moving average post bubble pop bounce CAN REBUY THEIR POSITION for less that they sold for if not substantially less at a later time. Look at the chart yourself. If you sell here don't lose sleep that the train will take off without you.

Now if you sold below the blue line it may be a different story. But it should put alot of ease to people thinking about closing their position (with intention to re-open) currently.

Two whole data points!  Damn, that is certainty.



416. Post 4528798 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: The Bitcoin Foundation on January 15, 2014, 04:49:29 PM


If you sell here do not lose sleep of being left behind

I encourage anyone to look at the weekly chart. I have looked at ever bubble pop / crash / bounce since the beginning and have noticed that anyone you sells above the 7 week moving average post bubble pop bounce CAN REBUY THEIR POSITION for less that they sold for if not substantially less at a later time. Look at the chart yourself. If you sell here don't lose sleep that the train will take off without you.

Now if you sold below the blue line it may be a different story. But it should put alot of ease to people thinking about closing their position (with intention to re-open) currently.

I was just using that as an example you can go back since BTC = $1 and come to the same conclusion

Maybe you can.  I just looked and in my opinion it is not a signal worth risking money on.  My conclusion is that you are seeing what you want to see.  Trading using a single indicator is one of the shortest paths to an empty trading account.



417. Post 4529164 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: The Bitcoin Foundation on January 15, 2014, 05:17:35 PM


If you sell here do not lose sleep of being left behind

I encourage anyone to look at the weekly chart. I have looked at ever bubble pop / crash / bounce since the beginning and have noticed that anyone you sells above the 7 week moving average post bubble pop bounce CAN REBUY THEIR POSITION for less that they sold for if not substantially less at a later time. Look at the chart yourself. If you sell here don't lose sleep that the train will take off without you.

Now if you sold below the blue line it may be a different story. But it should put alot of ease to people thinking about closing their position (with intention to re-open) currently.

I was just using that as an example you can go back since BTC = $1 and come to the same conclusion

Maybe you can.  I just looked and in my opinion it is not a signal worth risking money on.  My conclusion is that you are seeing what you want to see.  Trading using a single indicator is one of the shortest paths to an empty trading account.



Im speaking to the buy and hold crowd,. You know the ones who don't want to day trade but still want to increase their BTC stack. We just ran up from 100 to 1200! how can anyone possibly have an empty bank account by selling now at $950? with the intention to buy back 20% cheaper ? Again read what I wrote. Historyically speaking anyone who did this could have rebought their position NO MATTER WHAT at a cheaper price at a far later time.

Meaning, after a POP the train does not take off again without a a few months decline

Unless of course you think 1200 to 400 was just one big bear trap in which case we should be shooting up past ATH by now

If you are speaking to the "buy and hold crowd" and not traders, then you're wasting your breath by recommending a sale.  They are, after all, the "buy and hold crowd".  Sure, historically speaking it has worked out, but futuristically speaking, you should have dramatically less certainty, especially given the extremely limited data set you are drawing your conclusions from.



418. Post 4529581 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Quote from: The Bitcoin Foundation on January 15, 2014, 05:46:35 PM


If you sell here do not lose sleep of being left behind

I encourage anyone to look at the weekly chart. I have looked at ever bubble pop / crash / bounce since the beginning and have noticed that anyone you sells above the 7 week moving average post bubble pop bounce CAN REBUY THEIR POSITION for less that they sold for if not substantially less at a later time. Look at the chart yourself. If you sell here don't lose sleep that the train will take off without you.

Now if you sold below the blue line it may be a different story. But it should put alot of ease to people thinking about closing their position (with intention to re-open) currently.

I was just using that as an example you can go back since BTC = $1 and come to the same conclusion

Maybe you can.  I just looked and in my opinion it is not a signal worth risking money on.  My conclusion is that you are seeing what you want to see.  Trading using a single indicator is one of the shortest paths to an empty trading account.



Im speaking to the buy and hold crowd,. You know the ones who don't want to day trade but still want to increase their BTC stack. We just ran up from 100 to 1200! how can anyone possibly have an empty bank account by selling now at $950? with the intention to buy back 20% cheaper ? Again read what I wrote. Historyically speaking anyone who did this could have rebought their position NO MATTER WHAT at a cheaper price at a far later time.

Meaning, after a POP the train does not take off again without a a few months decline

Unless of course you think 1200 to 400 was just one big bear trap in which case we should be shooting up past ATH by now

If you are speaking to the "buy and hold crowd" and not traders, then you're wasting your breath by recommending a sale.  They are, after all, the "buy and hold crowd".  Sure, historically speaking it has worked out, but futuristically speaking, you should have dramatically less certainty, especially given the extremely limited data set you are drawing your conclusions from.

Look at what happends AFTER a crash. it NEVER just shoots up to continue on to new ATHs. It has to test support levels and allow time to rethink or sell before any confidence can be restored and more panic buying can resume.


I've been here since before $1.  You're not going to convince me by telling me to look at the charts.  I saw them as they happened.  If you want to gamble, be my guest.  But if you advertise it as a sure thing, I will call you out.



419. Post 4530611 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: The Bitcoin Foundation on January 15, 2014, 06:48:52 PM


If you sell here do not lose sleep of being left behind

I encourage anyone to look at the weekly chart. I have looked at ever bubble pop / crash / bounce since the beginning and have noticed that anyone you sells above the 7 week moving average post bubble pop bounce CAN REBUY THEIR POSITION for less that they sold for if not substantially less at a later time. Look at the chart yourself. If you sell here don't lose sleep that the train will take off without you.

Now if you sold below the blue line it may be a different story. But it should put alot of ease to people thinking about closing their position (with intention to re-open) currently.

I was just using that as an example you can go back since BTC = $1 and come to the same conclusion

Maybe you can.  I just looked and in my opinion it is not a signal worth risking money on.  My conclusion is that you are seeing what you want to see.  Trading using a single indicator is one of the shortest paths to an empty trading account.



Im speaking to the buy and hold crowd,. You know the ones who don't want to day trade but still want to increase their BTC stack. We just ran up from 100 to 1200! how can anyone possibly have an empty bank account by selling now at $950? with the intention to buy back 20% cheaper ? Again read what I wrote. Historyically speaking anyone who did this could have rebought their position NO MATTER WHAT at a cheaper price at a far later time.

Meaning, after a POP the train does not take off again without a a few months decline

Unless of course you think 1200 to 400 was just one big bear trap in which case we should be shooting up past ATH by now

If you are speaking to the "buy and hold crowd" and not traders, then you're wasting your breath by recommending a sale.  They are, after all, the "buy and hold crowd".  Sure, historically speaking it has worked out, but futuristically speaking, you should have dramatically less certainty, especially given the extremely limited data set you are drawing your conclusions from.

Look at what happends AFTER a crash. it NEVER just shoots up to continue on to new ATHs. It has to test support levels and allow time to rethink or sell before any confidence can be restored and more panic buying can resume.


I've been here since before $1.  You're not going to convince me by telling me to look at the charts.  I saw them as they happened.  If you want to gamble, be my guest.  But if you advertise it as a sure thing, I will call you out.

Lets revisit this and see who is right . To qoute me Selling now at $950  with re-buy set at $760 (-20%)

Meaning even though Im bullish I recognize $760 WILL be revisited before going back up. Increasing my BTC holding 20%, Lets revisit this in a Month (if not sooner) and see how it plays out shall we.



I'm not disagreeing that it might go down.  I'm disagreeing that it will go down with 100% certainty.  Giving it a month won't prove anything about my position no matter what happens.



420. Post 4530712 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: donut on January 15, 2014, 06:55:43 PM


If you sell here do not lose sleep of being left behind

I encourage anyone to look at the weekly chart. I have looked at ever bubble pop / crash / bounce since the beginning and have noticed that anyone you sells above the 7 week moving average post bubble pop bounce CAN REBUY THEIR POSITION for less that they sold for if not substantially less at a later time. Look at the chart yourself. If you sell here don't lose sleep that the train will take off without you.

Now if you sold below the blue line it may be a different story. But it should put alot of ease to people thinking about closing their position (with intention to re-open) currently.

I was just using that as an example you can go back since BTC = $1 and come to the same conclusion

Maybe you can.  I just looked and in my opinion it is not a signal worth risking money on.  My conclusion is that you are seeing what you want to see.  Trading using a single indicator is one of the shortest paths to an empty trading account.



Im speaking to the buy and hold crowd,. You know the ones who don't want to day trade but still want to increase their BTC stack. We just ran up from 100 to 1200! how can anyone possibly have an empty bank account by selling now at $950? with the intention to buy back 20% cheaper ? Again read what I wrote. Historyically speaking anyone who did this could have rebought their position NO MATTER WHAT at a cheaper price at a far later time.

Meaning, after a POP the train does not take off again without a a few months decline

Unless of course you think 1200 to 400 was just one big bear trap in which case we should be shooting up past ATH by now

If you are speaking to the "buy and hold crowd" and not traders, then you're wasting your breath by recommending a sale.  They are, after all, the "buy and hold crowd".  Sure, historically speaking it has worked out, but futuristically speaking, you should have dramatically less certainty, especially given the extremely limited data set you are drawing your conclusions from.

Look at what happends AFTER a crash. it NEVER just shoots up to continue on to new ATHs. It has to test support levels and allow time to rethink or sell before any confidence can be restored and more panic buying can resume.


I've been here since before $1.  You're not going to convince me by telling me to look at the charts.  I saw them as they happened.  If you want to gamble, be my guest.  But if you advertise it as a sure thing, I will call you out.

Lets revisit this and see who is right . To qoute me Selling now at $950  with re-buy set at $760 (-20%)

Meaning even though Im bullish I recognize $760 WILL be revisited before going back up. Increasing my BTC holding 20%, Lets revisit this in a Month (if not sooner) and see how it plays out shall we.



I'm not disagreeing that it might go down.  I'm disagreeing that it will go down with 100% certainty.  Giving it a month won't prove anything about my position no matter what happens.

Please design a scenario in which your position will be proven false.

My position is that nobody can predict the future with 100% certainty.  If you disagree, you need to prove that someone can predict the future with 100% certainty.  Good luck.



421. Post 4549445 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: MAbtc on January 16, 2014, 05:59:26 PM
More chart BS Smiley
This time for the Bulls

Huobi clearly shows a pennant, which suggests  a continuation of the uptrend once complete (in about 3 days)



Not a pennant IMO, based on a few things -- time frame, absence of flag pole, the fact that the first downward wave of the formation broke below previous resistance (i.e. the bottom of the flag pole). The fact that the sharp move that typically precedes a pennant is contained within this formation is another indication that this is a longer term consolidation pattern.

I see a symmetrical triangle, which admittedly is more bullish than the current formations on western exchanges. I would expect a breakout earlier than 3 days based on the wave structure and proximity to the close of the triangle. Much longer and it won't be very reliable. But I don't see a bullish bias at all.

But what what if China has been trolling us all along, only to leave the western traders caught with their shorts on.



422. Post 4549495 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: seleme on January 16, 2014, 06:03:36 PM
This flat market is losing me money with my bots left, right and center. They're buying at top and selling at bottom like a boss  Grin

Thank you.  My bots appreciate the extra volatility since they focus on stabilization rather than trend following.



423. Post 4556310 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: shmadz on January 17, 2014, 01:23:24 AM
Here is an obscenely bullish desktop wallpaper (for usage as pr0n substitute), concentrating at this multiple times a day for 2 minutes each time will release endorphins and convert every bear into a bull after long enough exposure. I have made it 1024*768 for old laptops, I can make higher resolutions too.  Grin


this is cool, but can you make a negative of that? I prefer a dark background. Thanks.

Open in gimp (http://www.gimp.org), right click image, colors->invert.  Save image.  Thanks.



424. Post 4556417 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: thms on January 17, 2014, 01:38:01 AM
There will be a huge speculative sell soon... holders will sell their coins to buy later when the price drops

You speak with such authority, clearly you have seen the future.  I have sold everything.  Tell me, at what price should I buy?



425. Post 4556627 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: shmadz on January 17, 2014, 01:43:47 AM

Open in gimp (http://www.gimp.org), right click image, colors->invert.  Save image.  Thanks.

Thank you, but I can not seem to save the image as anything other than .xcf and I can't seem to make windows accept that as a background, any other options?


File->export or file->Overwrite previous.filename

Gimp supports jpg, PNG, gif, BMP, and about 100 other formats, so you should be able to save it however you'd like.  Also, http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gimp+save+as+png&l=1

The technology and information to empower you is out there if you will only look.



426. Post 4570022 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on January 17, 2014, 08:27:01 PM
On other news:

eBay UK to Allow Sale of Virtual Currency from 10th February[/size]
Emily Spaven (@emilyspaven) | Published on January 16, 2014 at 21:36 GMT | Companies, Merchants, News
ebay
eBay is launching a dedicated Virtual Currency category on eBay Classifieds in the UK on 10th February.

The Classified Ads category will allow for the sale of all types of digital currency, including bitcoin and litecoin, eBay representatives have confirmed.

eBay Classifieds, which lists posts throughout the site, serves as the site’s answer to Craigslist. eBay provides the free platform for local buyers and sellers to connect, but does not participate in the transactions.


http://www.coindesk.com/ebay-uk-virtual-currency-february/

I think that kills localbitcoins with their 1% fees

Unless eBay has seller protection, no one's going to care.

This, plus eBay and paypal fees are way more than 1%.



427. Post 4572971 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: deadfi$h on January 17, 2014, 10:31:57 PM
http://seekingalpha.com/news/1514731-report-prospects-for-winklevoss-bitcoin-etf-approval-look-good

ETF review going smoothly, once it is approved we can properly short!

I thought too much shorting hurt the price in the long run?  Huh

Shorting is a neutral activity. When you short, you sell now and have to buy back in later within the amount of time you're able to borrow the underlying commodity. The media loves to jump all over shorters because short selling, like any selling, can push the price down. Those same sellers are forced to buy back in though, potentially causing a bounce or creating a bottom, reversing the initial price movement.

Traders like me love the ability to short because it allows you to profit regardless of which direction the market is moving. The only thing that matters then is the percentage that the price is moving whether up or down because that is your potential profit.

Market looks strong -> buy
Market looks weak -> short.

Shorting is only helpful when it is profitable.  If the shorters are incorrect, it leads to a short squeeze which adds volatility.



428. Post 4573828 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.56h):

Quote from: deadfi$h on January 17, 2014, 11:56:15 PM
http://seekingalpha.com/news/1514731-report-prospects-for-winklevoss-bitcoin-etf-approval-look-good

ETF review going smoothly, once it is approved we can properly short!

I thought too much shorting hurt the price in the long run?  Huh

Shorting is a neutral activity. When you short, you sell now and have to buy back in later within the amount of time you're able to borrow the underlying commodity. The media loves to jump all over shorters because short selling, like any selling, can push the price down. Those same sellers are forced to buy back in though, potentially causing a bounce or creating a bottom, reversing the initial price movement.

Traders like me love the ability to short because it allows you to profit regardless of which direction the market is moving. The only thing that matters then is the percentage that the price is moving whether up or down because that is your potential profit.

Market looks strong -> buy
Market looks weak -> short.

Shorting is only helpful when it is profitable.  If the shorters are incorrect, it leads to a short squeeze which adds volatility.

True. Some people like volatility though. Isn't that why we're all investing in Bitcoin and not General Motors?

I'm in bitcoin because I think it is a revolutionary, freedom enabling, decentralized currency.  I accept that volatility will likely exist in the exchange rate, but that's not why I'm here.



429. Post 4625419 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: NamelessOne on January 20, 2014, 06:01:25 PM
So what is with those 10-20btc buys on gox every few minutes. They are going on for 4 days now... Not that I don't like them Grin , but lots of btc should be in that wallet till now (if it is one buyer - bot).
People have been calling that the Willy bot. He has been buying 15-17 bitcoins every seven to ten minutes since Christmas, turned off a couple times. Many are theorizing that Gox owns it since it was the only thing capable of trading last week when Gox went off line. Yet it kept trading for an hour and a half, slowly pushing the price up while no one else could do anything.

You keep saying this, but it is still not true.  My bot made it though that just fine.  Just because one API is down doesn't mean all four are.  You must be looking for conspiracy to find one where there is none.



430. Post 4637044 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

ChartBuddy seems lonely.  Hi ChartBuddy.  Smiley



431. Post 4638821 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: Ducky1 on January 21, 2014, 09:54:51 AM
Shut the fuck up about the rotten dog money ffs.!

Such rage, many anger.



432. Post 4638959 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: Ducky1 on January 21, 2014, 09:59:47 AM
Shut the fuck up about the rotten dog money ffs.!

Such rage, many anger.

Yes, you guys ruin a perfectly fine thread with you dog manure.

1. Nobody takes this thread seriously
2. Does complaining about "dog manure" and "rotten dog money" make for higher quality posts, or just more noise?



433. Post 4646115 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: TakeTheSkyRoad on January 21, 2014, 11:54:52 AM
1. Nobody takes this thread seriously
2. Does complaining about "dog manure" and "rotten dog money" make for higher quality posts, or just more noise?

This thread should be renamed "Bitcointalk Troll House - also sometimes Wall Observing".

I wonder how many older potential investors get scared away by our troll generation.

I'm a regular reader since about June last year and it's an acquired skill to mentally filter through the last few pages each day.
I immediately filter out the charts edited in paint, memes, trains, bottoms (brief pause tho), nested replies from yesterday's drivel, new drivel.

What remains is the odd gem of insightful advice which is generally worth effort.
(not much effort, maybe a minute per page)

In reply to point 1 though.... this is an internet forum and nothing should be taken seriously.
As I stated above the circus does have it's uses though Smiley

Exactly, this is a "brainstorming" thread.  You have to have lots of ideas in order to have a good idea.

As the idea was originally conceived (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainstorming), brainstorming has two principles:
1. Defer judgment,
2. Reach for quantity

At least for me, Dogecoin discussion has brought up some interesting psychological questions that also apply to Bitcoin to some extent.  It is as topic that is at least as insightful as CCMF!, double bottom, and "to the moon!" posts.



434. Post 4647032 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on January 21, 2014, 05:55:14 PM
There's a very obvious Occam's Razor-style explanation for why the price hasn't appeared to be so news-sensitive. Maybe it's really been reacting mostly to fundamentals all along, and our consensus of relating it to news is just ex post facto attribution error?

Sure. And Dogecoin is obviously reacting to fundamentals as well.

In fact, it is.  One of the basic premises of Dogecoin is the meme-factor.  From a viral marketing perspective, dogecoins cute dogs and silly language is much more appealing to the majority of the human psyche than bitcoin's marketing, which talks of decentralized, p2p networks, ecliptic curve digital signature algorithms, hash functions, and merchant adoption (which is admittedly still hard to find unless you are looking).



435. Post 4647370 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on January 21, 2014, 05:55:14 PM
There's a very obvious Occam's Razor-style explanation for why the price hasn't appeared to be so news-sensitive. Maybe it's really been reacting mostly to fundamentals all along, and our consensus of relating it to news is just ex post facto attribution error?

Sure. And Dogecoin is obviously reacting to fundamentals as well.

In fact, it is.  One of the basic premises of Dogecoin is the meme-factor.  From a viral marketing perspective, dogecoins cute dogs and silly language is much more appealing to the majority of the human psyche than bitcoin's marketing, which talks of decentralized, p2p networks, ecliptic curve digital signature algorithms, hash functions, and merchant adoption (which is admittedly still hard to find unless you are looking).



436. Post 4648876 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: windjc on January 21, 2014, 07:23:34 PM
In NYC bitcoin was on the front page of the Times last week
Speaking of which, I was touristing in NY over the year-end holidays (yes, it was cold). We went to see Wall Street one evening, and was surprised to see a "Bitcoin Information Center" right next door to NYSE.  Behind a small lounge one could see a room where someone was presenting a talk to a small audience.

My sons, who knew of my obsession strong scientific interest in the matter, urged me to go in and pretend I was some rich sucker would-be investor. While we were at it, a fellow came out and invited us inside, saying something about something being already up to some zillions of dollars.  But I was too tired and thinking only of getting back to my hotel.

The rent for that place must be a small fortune.  That's one thing that I find off-putting about Bitcoin: too much lavish marketing for a project by a bunch of young digital subversives whose goal is to steal a highly lucrative business from banks and undermine the governments' control of money flow, worldwide.


Your particular type of psychosis is an interesting case. I wish we could get some professional opinions on it. On one hand you are aware that you have this obsession with bitcoin, yet your obsession is purely negative. It is like you get some sort of pleasure in hating bitcoin. You have even admitted that part of you has sour grapes and are bitter that you missed out on such incredible growth. But the arguments you use against bitcoin are mostly rehashed fare that has been recycled through these forums a dozen times or more. Now you are starting to bring more and more absurd "insights" to the table, suggesting that bitcoin is full of subversive techie salespeople pitching bitcoin in back rooms like it was wolf of Wall Street meets Scientology meets Ron Paul meets Star Trek.

You seem to be getting more and more delusional in your assertions and in your obsession. Why don't you go spend your time doing something productive? Or at least find an obsession that you are positively wired towards. Right now you are starting to come across as soon creepy bitcoin stalker. I can tell your not the common troll, that's why I'm even responding to you. Go spend time with your kids. Have sex with your wife. Do something that makes you happy. For your own sake man, get out of this forum.


o_O

Projecting much?


Not at all. Did that hit a little too close to home Oda? Wink

You continue to make no sense whatsoever. Or I don't get the joke. Trying to find anything Jorge-etc posted that could be construed as "negative obsession" with Bitcoin... all I see is a moderately bearish poster. Guess what, he's not alone Cheesy

If it makes no sense to you it's because you haven't read his body of posts. Do some reading.  "Moderately bearish" is the under statement of the year.  He does not and has never had interest in owning bitcoin.

The fact that you relate to him means my comments did hit too close to home.

I'm actually generally worried about the guy. I don't think someone should spend time researching and writing about things they loath. What a waste.

Case I point. Last time I checked this was a trading forum. You and I trade. We discuss trades. Jorgi has never and will never buy the very asset that is being traded and discussed here. Again, what a fucking waste IMO.

Guess what?  People can change their opinions.  Just because he said something in the past doesn't mean you should judge every post after it by what he said before.  You seem to be very good are remembering and pointing out peoples past mistakes as they are trying to improve themselves.



437. Post 4650848 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.57h):

Quote from: windjc on January 21, 2014, 07:40:31 PM
Guess what?  People can change their opinions.  Just because he said something in the past doesn't mean you should judge every post after it by what he said before.  You seem to be very good are remembering and pointing out peoples past mistakes as they are trying to improve themselves.

Did I miss the part where he is trying to improve himself?

I know some of you have taken it upon yourself to try and bring him around. I think its wasted effort. Bitcoin will bring people like Jorgi around by itself eventually, unless a person just truly loves to hate it.

There is not much we need to do other than spread the word, use it, invest in it and/or its eco-system. Bitcoin will do the rest.

There are people that still hate Apple. Who knows, perhaps you are one. No matter how obvious a success something is some people are going to hate it.

One of my former careers was actually motivation and personal development training. I stood in front of 1000s of people at a time and spoke. I traveled all across the country. So, I have had a fair bit of personal experience dealing with people and their motivation for "improving" themselves. My conclusion: lead by example. Most people are not going to change unless they decide deep down its something they want to do.

I'm not saying anybody needs to help anybody else with motivation or self improvement.  You clearly have a cynical view of people, which is only strengthened by you throwing the past in their face.  Of course people won't improve in such an environment as you foster.

Oh, and I do hate Apple, as a company.  As an investment, I agree they have been and may still be a good bet.  But their abuse of intellectual property laws, consumer privacy, and lack of user control of purchased hardware leave me with a bad taste in my mouth.



438. Post 4672449 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.58h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 22, 2014, 09:03:40 PM
I would also like to point out that I have a private key memorized.  Nobody's worked out a way to hack human memory as far as I'm aware. Cool

In order to use your bitcoins, at some point the key have to be entered into a computer... 


Only the signature needs to be input.  This could be worked out on paper from the transaction and the private key.



439. Post 4737641 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: chessnut on January 25, 2014, 09:25:23 PM
Weekend bull trap? Final edition?

bitcoin itself is a permanent bull trap

what are you doing on this forum???
I dont feel trapped.... I feel..... rich?

But yet you can't make yourself sell Tongue.



440. Post 4738124 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: Ducky1 on January 25, 2014, 09:39:42 PM
Weekend bull trap? Final edition?

bitcoin itself is a permanent bull trap

what are you doing on this forum???
I dont feel trapped.... I feel..... rich?

But yet you can't make yourself sell Tongue.

Why would anyone sell the next world currency?

You can have too much of anything.  Currency is only useful if you can spend it.



441. Post 4740441 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: byronbb on January 26, 2014, 12:07:04 AM
ATMs seem foolishly expensive in light of ZipZap.


Too bad the nearest ZipZap payment location is 5-6 hours away.



442. Post 4740527 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 26, 2014, 12:17:13 AM
Are you in the UK? I'm guessing not if a location's that far away unless you're a lighthouse keeper.

I assume they'll be hitting the rest of the world pretty rapidly after. I've no idea why they chose Britain though.

Nope, US.  Although to be fair, there aren't any bitcoin ATMs at all around here.  It's cool though, coinbase takes care of me when I can't find a local contact to trade with.



443. Post 4740622 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: gentlemand on January 26, 2014, 12:23:10 AM
Are you in the UK? I'm guessing not if a location's that far away unless you're a lighthouse keeper.

I assume they'll be hitting the rest of the world pretty rapidly after. I've no idea why they chose Britain though.

Nope, US.  Although to be fair, there aren't any bitcoin ATMs at all around here.  It's cool though, coinbase takes care of me when I can't find a local contact to trade with.

They seem to have been a bit quiet about the US. Maybe there are more regulations to untangle than other places.

They would need a money transmission license in each state they wished to service customers.  Most states require a "surety bond" as a condition of licensure.  For example, in my home state they would have to put down $300,000 in addition to any processing and legal fees.  Some estimates put this cost at about $20 million to be able to service all 50 states.  No wonder there is no competition in the banking sector....



444. Post 4743514 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

Quote from: TERA on January 26, 2014, 04:26:01 AM
There are now 3 camps here:

1. Hodling
2. Day tarding
3. Fuckign bubble


What if I'm in all 3 camps?



445. Post 4744725 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.59h):

maybe somebody just has a lot of fiat stuck at gox



446. Post 4863645 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.01h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 31, 2014, 08:34:14 PM
Here is my prediction for the coming month:



The plot shows the Bitstamp prices from Nov/2013 to Jan/2014 (purple) and estimated lower and upper bounds for Feb/2014 (green).  I claim that, in any 1-hour interval in the coming month, the Bitstamp price will be within the two green lines above, with 95% probability.

For example, I claim that on Feb/22 the price will be between 300 USD and 2200 USD with 95% probability.

(Note that this is not the same thing as saying that the entire price plot will stay in that region for the whole month with 95% probability.)

This prediction is based on the simple "log Brownian" model that I described a while ago.  Namely, it assumes that the price change from one 1-hour interval to the next, in log scale, is a normal random variable that is independent of the previous history.  

More precisely let P(i) be the weighted mean transaction price in the 1-hourinterval number i.  Let Z(i) be log_10(P(i)). The model assumes that

  Z(i+1) = Z(i) + C*RAND(i)

where the factors RAND(i) are independent random variabls with zero mean, unit deviation, and Gaussian distribution.  Therefore, for any n > 0,

  Z(i+n) = Z(i) + C*sqrt(n)*RAND(i,n)

where factors RAND(i,n) are again random (but not independent) variables with zero mean, unit deviation, and Gaussian distribution.

Analysis of the Bitstamp prices from Sep/2013 to Jan/2014 yields 0.00964 as the best fit for the parameter C.

Since 95% of the probability of the Gaussian distribution is within 2 deviations of the mean, the model implies that, n steps in the future,
the value Z(i+n) will be within the values

  Zmin(i,n) = Z(i) - 2*C*sqrt(n) and
  Zmax(i,n) = Z(i) + 2*C*sqrt(n)

with 95% probability, where Z(i) is the current (last known) price.  The green lines are these two bounds, converted back to linear scale (Pmin(i,n) = 10**Zmin(i,n), etc.)

More specifically, according to the model, at any specific 1-hour interval i+n in the future, the log price Z(i+n) will be

   below Zmin(i,n) with 2.5% probability;
   between Zmin(i,n) and the current price Z(i) with 47.5% probability;
   between the current price Z(i) and Zmax(i,n) with 47.5% probability;
   above Zmax(i,n) with 2.5% probability.

Note that, by this model, the future prices P(i+n) may be on either side of the current price (red line) with equal probability, even though the inverse log mapping yields a much wider range above than below.
 
Of course this model is quite rudimentary and basically useless for traders.  There may be more sophisticated models, but I doubt that they can yield better predictions.  

(The Brownian model is visibly inadequate for small n, since the log price increments from one interval to the next do not have a Gaussian distribution.  As a consequence, the 2*sigma interval Zmin(i,n) to Zmax(i,n) contains somewhat less than 95% of the probability.  However, by the Law of Large Numbers the distribution becomes almost Gaussian after a few hours. )

(before people ask: no, a model with a linear "historical trend" term Z(i+n) = Z(i) + T*n + C*sqrt(n)*RAND(i,n) does not seem appropriate, and its predictions for the next month would not be significantly different.)


As the work of Mandelbrot pretty definitively shows[1], you should nearly always include a fat tail on both sides of your distribution.  You can still skew it if you like, but odds are your model will be vastly wrong at some point if you don't have a fat tail on the downside risk.  Tell me, at which point does risk reach 0?

Your methodology is pretty much what has been taught the last 50 years in finance, but since 2008, Mandelbrot's critique and improved models have gotten some attention.  As you can clearly see by being involved with Bitcoin, people are cautions when their assets are involved.  Sometimes this causes clinging to outdated dogma, but you have to fit the model to the data, not the data to the model.

1. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=mandelbrot+markets



447. Post 4906977 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on January 31, 2014, 11:42:19 PM
As the work of Mandelbrot pretty definitively shows[1], you should nearly always include a fat tail on both sides of your distribution.

I am sure that there exist better prediction methods (say, that provide "X% confidence" intervals that are narrower than those of the Brownian model but still  contain the predicted value at least X% of the time in the long run).  I am a complete amateur in this field.

Indeed, as you say, a fat tail is evident in the distribution of the one-step increments Z(i+1) - Z(i).  However, both theory and data tell me that a Gaussian distribution, with linearly increasing variance,  works well for larger steps Z(i+n) - Z(i) when n is ~20 hours or more.  See this plot:



This is a series of crude histograms of the quantity R(i,n) = (Z(i+n) - Z(i))/sqrt(n), sampled from the reference datafile (Bitstamp 2013-09-01 to 2014-01-30, 1 hour intervals) with various values of i,  tallied separately for each stride n.  The "n" axis runs across the middle of the plot, with n=1 at the upper left edge and increasing down to the right. The "R" axis is perpendicular to it, with R=0 in the middle.  The histogram for each n is normalized to unit sum.

The long fat tails and narrower peak of the distribution for small n is quite evident.  However, as n increases, the tails and sharp peak seem to disappear, as one would expect from the Law of Large Numbers.

Actually, I am not really sure about the tails because the number of samples in each histogram also gets smaller when n increases.  Perhaps the following plot is more convincing:



In this plot, the horizontal axis is the stride n (hours), and the vertical axis is the log increment D(i,n) = Z(i+n) - Z(i)  (not divided by sqrt(n)).

The light brown crosses on each vertical line are a sample of differences D(i,n) with same value of n and various values of i.  Each green dot is the mean of the sample increments D(i,n) with same n.  Each red dot is the standard deviation of those increments, computed assuming that their expected value is 0 (rather than the empirical mean shown by the green dot).  The histogram-like lines are the 2.5% and 97.5% percentiles of those samples.  

The orange curve is the deviation sigma(n) = C*sqrt(n) of D(i,n) predicted by the log-Brownian model.  The purple curves are the ±2*sigma(n) bounds above and below D=0.

According to this plot, for n ~15 hours or more, the empirical deviation (red dots) is very close to the model C*sqrt(n) (orange line).  For n ~30 hours or more, the curves ± 2*C*sqrt(n) folow the empirical 2.5%-97.5% percentiles as accurately as one could expect.  

The model clearly fails for smaller n; in particular, over the span of 5 hours, large swings occur more often than would be expected in a log-Brownian model.   Therefore, I  was too confident in my prediction for tomorrow; but with a bit of luck, I should be safe for the rest of the month.  Smiley

The slightly ascending green line means that there is a consistent increasing trend in that sample.  That trend also manifests itself in the growing gap between the empirical 2.5% percentile and the -2*sigma(n) curve.  However, if I had used only the last 2 months of data for the analysis, instead of the last 5, the trend would have been decreasing - and stronger.  That is one of the reasons why I did not include a trend term.

I have looked for correlations between successive increments (Z(i) - Z(i-1)  and Z(i+1)-Z(i)), but did not see anything clearly significant.  If there is such a correlation, it must be very subtle, and should be quickly "forgotten" after a few time steps.

Note that real stock prices are influenced by "real world" factors such as demand for the product, raw material prices, etc.  Those factors vary according to their own nature in various time scales, that range from decades to hours.  Maybe it is those factors that provide the long-term correlations characteristic of fractal signals?

In contrast, Bitcoin's price is almost entirely set by speculation; while external news may trigger changes, they do not directly determine the magnitude of those changes. ("How many billion dollars were subtracted from Bitcoin's future usage in e-commerce payments because of Shrem's arrest?")

So perhaps Bitcoin's price is indeed better described by a log-Brownian model than by a fractal process...


In my experience, markets tend to violate the normality assumption pretty severely, bitcoin included.  It will work fine the vast majority of the time, but you will find that when it fails, there is a cluster of failures before the model recovers.  Because of this clustering, in stock market data, events that should happen every 10,000 years under a Bayesian curve actually happen every 30 years.



448. Post 4956714 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.02h):

Quote from: scorp1618 on February 05, 2014, 05:46:10 PM
Gox chart https://www.tradingview.com/v/4hKqJpci/

Your "green" and "blue" are tough to distinguish.



449. Post 4964980 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.03h):

Quote from: nakaone on February 06, 2014, 02:19:27 AM
but seriously - this apple stuff is fuckin bad news

Why?  It's not the first time they kicked out blockchain.info.  It's not the first time they've rejected or kicked out other apps.  Apple has taken a defensive posture when it comes to bitcoin apps.  They are making 30% for processing itunes and app store payments and they don't want anything to interfere with that.  It's the only business model they have left at this point.



450. Post 5541083 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: shmadz on March 06, 2014, 06:28:13 AM
major flashback to the +/- 5 dollar days. <- edit for clarity: referring to the 4 or 5 months where we were stuck at 5 bucks, give or take.

I think about this when people start getting bored after slowness for 2 days in a row. These people would never have survived that period.

It was too painful. I put my coins in cold storage.

hah! well done!

it's painful for me for different reasons; as a miner at that time I still thought I was making 'free money' and I spent more bitcoin then I like to admit during those dark days Sad

When it tripled to $3 in a matter of days, I sold so many BTC...



451. Post 5671509 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 13, 2014, 06:22:40 AM
So here is a stupid question to kill time: Suppose the Evil Lords decide to use the bitcoins seized from Silk Road and other places to kill bitcoin by spamming it with billions of tiny transactions, as fast as they can.  How would the network defend itself from that attack?

To stop legitimate transactions, they have to be willing to pay more in fees than the legitimate transaction senders.  If they are willing to pay more, there isn't much we can do but wait for them to run out of coins.



452. Post 7895794 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.59h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on July 17, 2014, 04:21:13 PM
...
I'm not really sure how it's a pyramid or inverted/reverse pyramid scheme, either.  Could you please explain?
...

There's more important stuff going on at the mo but whatever. In a pyramid lots of people lose out and a small number gain so in a reverse pyramid a small number lose out to the gain of many.

Why not just call it a wealth distribution mechanism?



453. Post 7908308 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.59h):

Quote from: TheJuice on July 18, 2014, 12:58:14 PM
Whats the call for today boys and girls. We looking green or red on the day??? Who's up for some day trading.

Just based on my gut reaction to the charts on several timeframes, I would say 40% up, 50% sideways (within 0.5 or maybe 1% of current), 10% down.



454. Post 8103624 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.01h):

Quote from: diebuntekuh on July 30, 2014, 03:35:03 PM

Don't worry  Wink  Cool



Sure, but percent change from 1 year prior is still well below historical norms.


If you want to look at the data in other ways, you can play with the view here: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/TCMDO

Debt growth has slowed and remains slow.  Everything will look exponential if you look at it in nominal terms because the dollar has devalued exponentially.



455. Post 8104245 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.01h):

Quote from: wingsfan23 on July 30, 2014, 04:10:21 PM

Don't worry  Wink  Cool


Sure, but percent change from 1 year prior is still well below historical norms.

If you want to look at the data in other ways, you can play with the view here: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/TCMDO

Debt growth has slowed and remains slow.  Everything will look exponential if you look at it in nominal terms because the dollar has devalued exponentially.

Debt growth has continued and debt remains huge.

FTFY

Debt growth has indeed slowed, as any six grader could understand from the data I presented.  However, we can't afford any growth in debt because of the massive excesses prior to 2008, particularly throughout the 70s and 80s.



456. Post 8119705 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):

Quote from: abercrombie on July 31, 2014, 02:01:11 PM
This pop related to the Argentina default? Shocked

Something tells me my huge accumulation of Argentina pesos was a bad idea.    Tongue

Don't confuse reversion to the mean with fundamental shifts.  We've had 8 days down.  One up is nothing yet.



457. Post 8119833 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):

Quote from: dnaleor on July 31, 2014, 02:11:43 PM
moon soon?

yes



We're still between 1 and 2..... The smoke is there, but we haven't even started moving up yet.



458. Post 8120327 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):

Quote from: Tzupy on July 31, 2014, 02:40:22 PM
A decent rebound and the bulls shout 'to da moon'. In order for the bullish scenario to live on, the next 48 (maybe 72) hours are critical.
If support at 540$ will be broken and new support found at 450$ or less, the bullish scenario will be invalidated, and we'll have capitulation.

At the very least it will be pumped up so that the 1st of the month buyers have to pay a bit more Tongue.



459. Post 8120770 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on July 31, 2014, 03:13:46 PM
I hate when the rallies pause! I want up.. bubble-style.

Bigger markets than bitcoin are also on the move.  Big money is distracted.  Give it time.



460. Post 8122927 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):

Quote from: aminorex on July 31, 2014, 05:42:13 PM
monkey is in denial, thinks the bottoming has not finished.

monkey says the u.s. long bond goes down, spx/rty go up until the close, but the latter are in a daily downtrend until next week.

monkey says you can still scalp long audusd intraday, but need to be short overnight.  similarly, buy silver intraday starting now, but stay short overnight.  i guess the commodities complex is all the same.

monkey has me long volatility all week.

when does monkey sleep?



461. Post 8122981 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):

Quote from: aminorex on July 31, 2014, 05:47:29 PM
when does monkey sleep?

weekends.

so short over the weekends?



462. Post 8139907 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.02h):

Quote from: aminorex on August 01, 2014, 05:09:39 PM
Not wanting to be the only animal in the zoo who fails to see the bleeding obvious, monkey is now bullish on BTC.
Monkey also thinks the GBPUSD trend will end directly, expects oil to turn up very, very soon, and wants me to close my long volatility position.
Monkey remains bearish the US long bond and precious metals, but thinks I should take profits on shorts in the Russell and S&P.


Buffalo is bullish on BTC until everybody he knows starts asking him about it.  He doesn't move quick enough to mess with trading.
Buffalo is short S&P, but doesn't want to miss the real action if there is bond market contagion.
But maybe buffalo shouldn't swim with monkeys and sharks, after all he's mostly meat and a place to climb out of the water.



463. Post 8300770 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.03h):

Quote from: kireinaha on August 11, 2014, 07:44:37 PM

But prices are too high right now, if we can get back to the $300s at least, all my friends at school who said "bitcoin is too expensive" will think about buying again.
Right now we're still sticking around $580 because of all the holders who refuse to accept a loss, but there's not much buying pressure to support it. It's simply unsustainable, imho.

Then your friends at school are complete idiots, because they can buy any amount of bitcoin they can afford.  They can buy $580, $58, $5.80, hell they can buy $0.58 or $0.001 cents worth.  It's all the same, it's all bitcoin.  Owning "whole coins" is illusory, it doesn't exist, it doesn't even matter.  Even the idea of a single "bitcoin" is simply a meaningless abstraction.

A bitcoin is simply an abstract unit of measure, with relative value that changes over time. Like the ounce is in the gold and silver world.  No one goes around saying "Hey, I own X number WHOLE ounces of gold!!"  No, they say "I own $6000 worth of gold."

I think they realize that, but they told me it's not fair that earlier investors could by hundreds of bitcoins for pennies on the dollar and they need to pay $580 to buy just one. So for that reason, they're going to wait until prices come back down again. And then my math teacher said that bitcoin in a ponzi scheme, and that "true value" is only $10 per coin, because he read about it on the Internet. That's just how people think, I guess.

And that's why he's teaching high school math instead of putting his skills to use in industry.



464. Post 8534714 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.08h):

Quote from: dannyspk on August 26, 2014, 01:50:13 AM
I shouldn't have shorted LTC.  Undecided Should I back at a loss? Any opinions?

I closed my 0.013 short below 0.01.  Just looking at LTCBTC I'd probably hold on to a short if I had one, but I'd rather be long BTC.  If you are short in USD terms, I would GTFO.



465. Post 8591970 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.09h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 30, 2014, 12:15:40 AM
There should be a government regulation against trolling.
Politicians would never outlaw themselves.
Interesting concept. I wonder which politicians are trolling this thread in their various capacities?
Jorge = [ ... ]
I am a government employee but a bit too old to start a political career now.  My best plan for retirement is that Papalcy thing.  Infallibility, lifetime post, and nearly guaranteed posthumous sainthood are not things to scoff at.  (Being an atheist should not be an insurmountable obstacle, I hope.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kF8I_r9XT7A (How to Become Pope)



466. Post 8830734 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.12h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on September 15, 2014, 03:25:46 PM
and the monday morning dumps are right on Q

also: stocks down, gold decline/dollar rally slowing, silver down, oil up, euro down.  Tech stocks struggling.



467. Post 8943361 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Quote from: Sandia on September 23, 2014, 06:52:31 PM
F*ck Bfx.
I just lost 2k USD to their circuit breaker system.  It took 5 minutes for my market buy, 10 minutes for my market sell.


You should know the rules (if not, do your due diligence).  Don't be an idiot and try to trade with market orders on a platform with a known circuit breaker.



468. Post 8956584 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on September 24, 2014, 05:33:13 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A037B2ah0Ec

thats right people its that easy. Lol!

shorts are gana burn.

One Little Weird Trick To Get Rich Quick

 Tongue
Yeah sounds like a thing for dumbasses for sure but I recognise the voice, it's Chris Dunn (https://www.youtube.com/user/chrisdunntv) and what he said is true (check his bitcoin videos, check the dates). He predicted all the major moves of BTC since $1200 (yes, all the shorting too) and the fall of MtGox before they happened (yes I followed him since the beginning).

No kidding. Check his old videos and their dates in his account for yourself.

Regardless, I'm not sure the bear market is over just yet like adam suggests.

if everyone listens to what he says and follows suit, its going to work.

its kind of like a self fulfilling prophecy.

plus he's got skills and knows to buy in a panic and stuff, so ya... not a bad person to follow for trades i guess.
But wait, the youtube account that posted the video, is actually him?

I don't wanna click malaware links.

Have you joined yet?

good question... doesn't he have his own youtube channel

seems fishy...

And you can't pay with btc, fuck giving this guy a CC.



469. Post 8958841 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on September 24, 2014, 07:03:42 PM
http://www.coindesk.com/us-banks-announce-ripple-protocol-integration/

This gonna be huge. And bullish as fuck, to quote adam.

Ripple may turn out to be what saves Bitcoin and fuels the next rally.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Ripple is the US banking system's attempt to avoid being destroyed by Bitcoin.

They think that if they make USD transactions easier then they'll be able to avoid losing the USD as a unit of account.

Note that Ripple's consensus system is a closed, invite-only network. Exactly what you'd want if you were trying to preserve a banking cartel's position in the world.

Even if you do NOT agree with Ripple's goals and objectives, would it NOT be a good investment, based on the rationale that you lay out, above.  

Let's say that various status quo banking, financial and government systems buy-into Ripple to attempt to preserve whatever status quo situation that they enjoy, then wouldn't we want to jump on board and profit from that, even if we do NOT agree ideologically and even if the bandaid solution of Ripple may NOT be long term ... but profit, while we can from such in investing into Ripple for the next 2-4 years or something like that?  

I am NOT talking any book because at the moment, I own NO ripple at all.... and actually I am disinclined to invest anything into ripple because it seems to be too much of a potential scam..

Ripple is not a good investment because a single private entity owns vastly more XRP than are in circulation and can squash the price at their discretion.



470. Post 8959012 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Quote from: Dragonkiller on September 24, 2014, 09:04:02 PM
http://www.coindesk.com/us-banks-announce-ripple-protocol-integration/

This gonna be huge. And bullish as fuck, to quote adam.

Ripple may turn out to be what saves Bitcoin and fuels the next rally.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Ripple is the US banking system's attempt to avoid being destroyed by Bitcoin.

They think that if they make USD transactions easier then they'll be able to avoid losing the USD as a unit of account.

Note that Ripple's consensus system is a closed, invite-only network. Exactly what you'd want if you were trying to preserve a banking cartel's position in the world.

Even if you do NOT agree with Ripple's goals and objectives, would it NOT be a good investment, based on the rationale that you lay out, above.  

Let's say that various status quo banking, financial and government systems buy-into Ripple to attempt to preserve whatever status quo situation that they enjoy, then wouldn't we want to jump on board and profit from that, even if we do NOT agree ideologically and even if the bandaid solution of Ripple may NOT be long term ... but profit, while we can from such in investing into Ripple for the next 2-4 years or something like that?  

I am NOT talking any book because at the moment, I own NO ripple at all.... and actually I am disinclined to invest anything into ripple because it seems to be too much of a potential scam..

Ripple is not a good investment because a single private entity owns vastly more XRP than are in circulation and can squash the price at their discretion.

so can satoshi and a handful of others

You're talking more coins than are in circulation vs. 10% of what is in circulation.  Big difference.



471. Post 8969826 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: empowering on September 25, 2014, 05:01:42 PM
No one has a crystal ball price could do anything up or down.

monkey does.  he wants it down for another week.
Would poking him with a pointy stick make him change his mind? Or monkey hookers and cocaine?

EDIT: Gold has a rocket up its arse and the dow is back on course with its plummet, should be a push up but I'm not about to doubt the monkeys wisdom.

Gold has been bouncing off the $1200 mark for past year and a half or so.... last time it went this low (it hit $1208.xx) was in July 2010, support seems strong enough at $1200 for a bounce off here ($1221 a moment ago) if it continues this will be its third bounce off of $1200, remains to be seen if it manages to break $1400 this time around...

It seems like its caught by the balls but I've a feeling something big is happening at the mo. The ESF isn't the only one pushing markets around, there's an economic war being fought on them and I think the drop after the US found an excuse to drop bombs on Syria may have been an escalation. In that regard Bitcoin is a bomb ready to go off any time, its another chink in the dollars world reserve armour.

Indeed, Gold is overdue a big move to the upside and it will come eventually, and is being pushed around at the moment and as you say not just the ESF, but it has got to give eventually, been a lot of accumulating going on past few years at a state level,  looks like some players are considering a return to a partial gold standard and a basket of currencies taking the place of the dollar as world reserve. I think you are right, BTC could play a role in this as the currency wars continue to pan out, gold already is already fully in play, as is the printing press of course. If the perfect storm occurs the next proper move to the upside, when the time is right will surely take gold up past $1800 and on towards $3000+.



What if the state level accumulation was primarily short covering?



472. Post 8969988 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: Torque on September 25, 2014, 05:27:27 PM
Anyone else in here use Circle?

I've never experienced a better way to buy bitcoins. So easy my grandma can do it.

A lot of people here would love to experience Circle, if they would ever fkn approve our requests for an account.

I've been sending them email requests since April.

I requested an invite once within a week of it being available.  I got my invite today.  Perhaps they don't like being spammed?



473. Post 8987677 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: grappa_barricata on September 27, 2014, 01:23:05 AM
Maybe it is time to pray everyone.  Cheesy  I seriously was praying that if there was anyone purposefully manipulating Bitcoin that they would stop.  Perhaps I should now pray that they just manipulate it the other direction?  I think that will be my prayer now!  

I have a noble cause for wanting the price to go up.  I am leaving for a mission trip in six weeks and we could use some more funds for a few things we want to do (medical camps, gifts for the elderly homes etc. . .)  Although God can provide in ways other than pumping up the Bitcoin price, it would certainly be an easy way to get the much needed funds at this point. Wink



I too have a noble cause... I want a Ferrari and a helicopter, or do you want me to take the bus everyday like now? No way! So, oh Mercury the almighty, indicate me the direction and I will follow it and sacrifice 10 puffy lambs in your blessed name. Amen.

Budha doesn't like it when you refer to him by his Roman name.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budha



474. Post 8987822 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: cbeast on September 27, 2014, 01:47:21 AM
Maybe it is time to pray everyone.  Cheesy  I seriously was praying that if there was anyone purposefully manipulating Bitcoin that they would stop.  Perhaps I should now pray that they just manipulate it the other direction?  I think that will be my prayer now!  

I have a noble cause for wanting the price to go up.  I am leaving for a mission trip in six weeks and we could use some more funds for a few things we want to do (medical camps, gifts for the elderly homes etc. . .)  Although God can provide in ways other than pumping up the Bitcoin price, it would certainly be an easy way to get the much needed funds at this point. Wink



I too have a noble cause... I want a Ferrari and a helicopter, or do you want me to take the bus everyday like now? No way! So, oh Mercury the almighty, indicate me the direction and I will follow it and sacrifice 10 puffy lambs in your blessed name. Amen.

Budha doesn't like it when you refer to him by his Roman name.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budha
Siddhartha drove a Mercury? Cool.

Budha != Buddha



475. Post 8996173 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: CoinThinker on September 27, 2014, 07:59:13 PM
Someone please wake me up when the ETF goes live

Do you really think ETF will boost the price of Bitcoin.
I do not believe on this theory.

An open door where millions of dollars can instantly be poured into Bitcoin easily?  How can it not boost the price is the question!

Simply: if a door opens and you can buy toilet paper for $400, will you jump in? Just because the opportunity has opened for this? Smiley

Don't think so.

Bitcoin was ONLY interesting as long long as bubbles could have happened. Those times are done (maybe there will be a couple of SMALL bubbles, but in the end market lost the confidence in BTC, as it should have been loosing it. It's a joke, which can be manipulated, destroyed, or raised with a few millions of USD. That is something that NEVER could happen with any real currency in the world).

My retired father has $10k in his retirement account he's ready to drop in as soon as it is available.  He doesn't want to invest any other way for tax reasons.  I'm sure he's not alone.



476. Post 8996952 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: Boxman90 on September 27, 2014, 09:28:15 PM
I'm a known a-religionist, but trust me there's nothing stronger than faith. It's somehow incorporated into this damn Matrix. Like a virus, or a secret weapon which whoever possesses a glimpse of it, can make miracles. Christian, Buddhist, Science; whatever you believe, if you believe it strongly, you can actually make it real.  

Except science is not a religion, thank you, and it is the only thing that can produce 'miracles' with actual reproducibility.

Science is a tool, but many scientists don't use it properly and cling to their beliefs on faith alone.



477. Post 8997012 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: Boxman90 on September 27, 2014, 09:34:29 PM
There is the dilemma I guess.  Money in of itself is not evil.  The LOVE of money is evil.  Do I love money?  I think it is hard not to be tempted by the comfort it can bring for sure.  I wrestle with this.  I am going to India in six weeks and I will be hit in the face and greatly humbled by those that can live lives of complete contentment and even joy with far less than I have.  So in a way you are right.  It is an area that I probably have some issues with, especially growing up in a rich area in the United States that is surrounded by every luxury we could ever want.  

You almost sound smug beforehand, as if you're being a better person by deciding to go somewhere where people are poor, and already portraying yourself as 'being humbled' before you even went.

As a critically thinking Christian (a rear breed indeed), I can assure you that the vast majority of Christians do see themselves as "better".  But, I also think most of them are fools who take the wrong things literally while ignoring the crucial truths that can be found in religious texts of all creeds.

@BitChick, while you're in India PLEASE do more listening than talking, especially about religion.



478. Post 8997049 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on September 27, 2014, 09:44:58 PM
...
Science is a tool, but many scientists don't use it properly and cling to their beliefs on faith alone.
It could be considered a religion in some ways. Science tries to explain the whole universe, most religions do the same. Quantum goes full circle and puts belief before creation.

Religion does it on faith. Science adapts its views based on what's observed and goes out of its way to find observations that conflict with its current understanding of the world. Not the same by a long shot.

Until your theory threatens their funding, then they refuse to consider your evidence and proceed blindly in the wrong direction.

Also, as a critically thinking Christian, my beliefs are indeed based on observation and I actively seek out new experiences that frequently force me to see the world differently.

Blind faith is an error that can be made by scientists and religious people alike.



479. Post 8997182 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: BitChick on September 27, 2014, 09:51:28 PM
There is the dilemma I guess.  Money in of itself is not evil.  The LOVE of money is evil.  Do I love money?  I think it is hard not to be tempted by the comfort it can bring for sure.  I wrestle with this.  I am going to India in six weeks and I will be hit in the face and greatly humbled by those that can live lives of complete contentment and even joy with far less than I have.  So in a way you are right.  It is an area that I probably have some issues with, especially growing up in a rich area in the United States that is surrounded by every luxury we could ever want.  

You almost sound smug beforehand, as if you're being a better person by deciding to go somewhere where people are poor, and already portraying yourself as 'being humbled' before you even went.

As a critically thinking Christian (a rear breed indeed), I can assure you that the vast majority of Christians do see themselves as "better".  But, I also think most of them are fools who take the wrong things literally while ignoring the crucial truths that can be found in religious texts of all creeds.

@BitChick, while you're in India PLEASE do more listening than talking, especially about religion.

I am sure I am going with a pre-conceived idea of what will happen and sure, I might be totally smug too.  I might be a greedy, selfish, self indulgent person that cannot even see her own hypocrisy and I need a good kick in the pants and hopefully this little trip, or other things in my life, will help me see the areas I am blind to.  That is my prayer anyways.

We are going to be doing various things in India, not just "talking."  We are putting in some water wells, visiting orphans and some other humanitarian outreaches.  I am actually going to be singing too, at least one song in their language, for a women's conference we are having with 500 women or so attending.  I was asked to talk.  It is humbling to do so really, so I have to admit that I will be doing some "talking."  It will be translated into Telugu.  It seems weird to go as a westerner to speak to Dalit women in India, but they are not used to American women even going there and in a way they are happy we are even coming.  (we are funding the entire event too.  Some of these women have never even been on a retreat at all so this is a huge even for them!  Regardless of what I say, or if it even irrelevant, the retreat itself will mean so much to them I hope!)

All I'm trying to say is that these people probably have more to add to your understanding then you have to add to theirs.  They have much more experience with struggle and sacrifice than you will ever know.  Keep that in mind, and do pray for humility before you go so you can maximize what you learn.



480. Post 8997302 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: criptix on September 27, 2014, 10:18:42 PM
so people bought btc to pump doge you say?  Shocked Roll Eyes

He's claiming people are sending btc to exchanges to pump doge.. that is network transactions, not exchange transactions.



481. Post 9005289 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.16h):

Quote from: Boxman90 on September 28, 2014, 04:19:52 PM
holders have good reason to be stubborn tho...

On the flipside, bears clearly had plenty of reason to be bearish.

They were born that way?



482. Post 9523273 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: fonsie on November 12, 2014, 07:25:38 PM
Anybody willing to take a guess at who would say the above??  Grin

Your alternative ego. Don't be lazy! Use to use the proper forum account or it doesn't count!

This account has only been used by 1 single IP adress and that IP adress has never been used for any other account.
Would really love it, if the forum would have a feature which would show if the account would be "unique", would proof in an instant how childish you are.

IP addresses are a terrible way to determine uniqueness of users.



483. Post 9523283 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: podyx on November 12, 2014, 07:29:34 PM
Don't fucking tell me we're going up again...

Nobody say anything, podyx wants to keep his head in the sand.



484. Post 9523435 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: fonsie on November 12, 2014, 07:40:27 PM
Anybody willing to take a guess at who would say the above??  Grin

Your alternative ego. Don't be lazy! Use to use the proper forum account or it doesn't count!

This account has only been used by 1 single IP adress and that IP adress has never been used for any other account.
Would really love it, if the forum would have a feature which would show if the account would be "unique", would proof in an instant how childish you are.

IP addresses are a terrible way to determine uniqueness of users.

No shit sherlock, but since I've got a fixed IP adress and haven't used any other, it would suffice in my case, but I don't have to prove myself.
Besides if he would be smart enough, he can clearly distinguish all accounts, based on the way each account writes and makes spelling mistakes.
But, it's ofcourse a lot easier to just throw accusations around and see what sticks.

So you're getting your panties in a bunch over some troll trolling?  Chill out dude.  Why do you give a shit what he says?  Why is it so important to you to be "right" in the eyes of somebody who's just trying to push your buttons for their own amusement?



485. Post 9523807 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on November 12, 2014, 08:17:09 PM
Shroomie, LampChop is that you?



Please don't remind me how many I sold at $3.  I was turning a steep profit at $1... then shit tripled and I got excited Sad.



486. Post 9523911 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on November 12, 2014, 08:24:51 PM
Shroomie, LampChop is that you?



Please don't remind me how many I sold at $3.  I was turning a steep profit at $1... then shit tripled and I got excited Sad.

Hey man don't worry, all you can do is affect the here & now.


It's all good... paid off hardware, had a blast spending some extra money, and I still hold enough bitcoin to keep me interested Wink.



487. Post 9523932 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 12, 2014, 08:26:57 PM
Please don't remind me how many I sold at $3.  I was turning a steep profit at $1... then shit tripled and I got excited Sad.
Too late for you, but maybe this warning will help somebody else:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG1qooBzE2w

lol... good ol bitcoinica Smiley



488. Post 9523956 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: Newbie1022 on November 12, 2014, 08:28:50 PM
Cmon, no fucking way we will not go down here..

Did you sell?

I closed a small bit of my long, Hoping that we hit 410 atleast

Yea, this s--- has gotten more than a little bit cartoonish at this point. Even the fiercest of hodlers wasn't saying... oh, we'll be at $450 today. Whoever just happened to have coins, good on you. But, this s--- is cartoonish.

The "fiercest of hodlers" are holding because they know everything in the 3 digits is WAY too low for bitcoin price. $400's is just childs play.

Hey, I'm not saying you all won't sell or that you don't have a wild valuation in your head -- what I'm saying is that you didn't wake up this morning and think it would be this price on the market board. No f---ing way.

I wake up EVERY morning knowing that the actual value of bitcoin is wayyy higher than the current price and I'm waiting for that correction to come.

2014 was the year of the "Great Shakeout" and you probably have very few coins right now. I see you joined the forums after the 2013 bubble and you have only seen the bear side of bitcoin. I told YOU specifically about a week ago, and I paraphrase, "I hope you realize that bitcoin IS the end game and that you don't miss the train being left as a fiat bag holder".

Crackpot! You are doing better than me, but you are still a cultish crackpot.

Such aggression, so sad.



489. Post 9523984 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: Newbie1022 on November 12, 2014, 08:30:59 PM
Cmon, no fucking way we will not go down here..

Did you sell?

I closed a small bit of my long, Hoping that we hit 410 atleast

Yea, this s--- has gotten more than a little bit cartoonish at this point. Even the fiercest of hodlers wasn't saying... oh, we'll be at $450 today. Whoever just happened to have coins, good on you. But, this s--- is cartoonish.

The "fiercest of hodlers" are holding because they know everything in the 3 digits is WAY too low for bitcoin price. $400's is just childs play.


Hey, I'm not saying you all won't sell or that you don't have a wild valuation in your head -- what I'm saying is that you didn't wake up this morning and think it would be this price on the market board. No f---ing way.

I wake up EVERY morning knowing that the actual value of bitcoin is wayyy higher than the current price and I'm waiting for that correction to come.

2014 was the year of the "Great Shakeout" and you probably have very few coins right now. I see you joined the forums after the 2013 bubble and you have only seen the bear side of bitcoin. I told YOU specifically about a week ago, and I paraphrase, "I hope you realize that bitcoin IS the end game and that you don't miss the train being left as a fiat bag holder".

Crackpot! You are doing better than me, but you are still a cultish crackpot.

Such aggression, so sad.

Did you not see the crazy bull---- that guy wrote. I mean, c'mon.

Doesn't even come close to the wildest things I've seen here from bears and bulls alike.  Bitcoin does have the potential for much higher valuations, and 2014 has been quite a shakeout.



490. Post 9524185 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: Newbie1022 on November 12, 2014, 08:47:20 PM
Nice one to the idiots bears shorting with my coins on finex. Thanks for the interest!

You're welcome. Yes, I'll admit it. Opened a short yesterday at 383, closed it at 406, rode long for a bit to 425 recouping part of it (about 2/3), and am short again at 425.

This market right now makes not a lick of sense to me. Too much, too soon, no reason... it's entirely possible that it was just oversold for a long time, but damn if this isn't a bit too sudden a change.

In a market like this you don´t go short, you close longs and open new ones(at a lower price) if you´re sure that a bottom is in and we´re going to break to new highs. Shorting in a massive bull market is stupid as fuck IMO  Smiley

It wasn't a massive bull market literally less than 24 hours ago, we got turned back at 2750 on Huobi and OkCoin and 2650 on Huobi just a few minutes ago suggesting that the bots have called the top, and it just seems like too much too soon.

Also, I'm using relatively narrow stops (not very narrow) and am willing to swing back in the market and ride to the next pivot point to recoup a portion of losses. Like, yesterday, I made a dumb--- call at 383... but I didn't absorb the entirety of that loss.

So, there's that. As to the other gentleman, Inca, who said I'm resorting to name calling... a guy was posting porn on here earlier today... it's been a bit of a crazy day no matter how you slice it. Fair?

It's been a massive bull market since trading started in 2009 at less than 1 penny/BTC.  If the bulls didn't move quick, they wouldn't catch as many bears with their shorts on.



491. Post 9524336 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: Newbie1022 on November 12, 2014, 08:58:06 PM
I was calling you out on the random childish name calling. Just because there is one (or more) idiots in the room doesn't mean that you have to join them. Acting out like that is a personal decision and reflects on yourself only.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that this isn't probably the right forum to be sensitive about name calling. People are making huge amounts on a day like this or losing huge amounts. There will be s--- talking. If you want a tea and crumpets parliamentary level conversation then there are plenty of book clubs. I hear people like those a lot. But, in a maniac day... have thicker skin. People are not going to self-moderate themselves and it is unrealistic to expect that.

Not that I mean any offense to you... but c'mon.

Translation: I don't give a shit how my actions reflect on me.  I'm going to express myself however I want, and if it makes me look like an idiot, so be it.  I'm emotional today.



492. Post 9524528 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: hdbuck on November 12, 2014, 09:19:14 PM
I was calling you out on the random childish name calling. Just because there is one (or more) idiots in the room doesn't mean that you have to join them. Acting out like that is a personal decision and reflects on yourself only.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that this isn't probably the right forum to be sensitive about name calling. People are making huge amounts on a day like this or losing huge amounts. There will be s--- talking. If you want a tea and crumpets parliamentary level conversation then there are plenty of book clubs. I hear people like those a lot. But, in a maniac day... have thicker skin. People are not going to self-moderate themselves and it is unrealistic to expect that.

Not that I mean any offense to you... but c'mon.

Translation: I don't give a shit how my actions reflect on me.  I'm going to express myself however I want, and if it makes me look like an idiot, so be it.  I'm emotional today.

youre not you. ^^

Yes, I am not me.



493. Post 9527630 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: nutschig on November 13, 2014, 04:10:11 AM
$19 dif stamp and huobi

$25, where's them arbitragers

They ran out of fiat... have to wait a few days for it to move.



494. Post 9533106 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: staffsan on November 13, 2014, 04:11:05 PM
I shprted at 340 using leverage. Fuck I lost a lot of money.  Cry

Shit fuck, wHY DID I NOT HODL?

This is one of several posts of this type ive seen. A brand new member simply stating theyve lost money shorting.
Theyre quite obviously fake, but im wondering whats the purpose of them? Is it some manipulator trying to give people the idea that the price wont drop again and that you should not short, or is it just someone trying to make fun of ppl who short?

Or it could be new members who got burnt because they didn't know how vicious the bitcoin bulls are.

But I guess conspiracy theories are more fun Tongue.



495. Post 9542626 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.31h):

Quote from: cbeast on November 14, 2014, 03:50:32 PM
What is going on Huh

What's going on is we're up over 16% since a week ago. That in itself is pretty crazy, anything above 400 at this time is just incredible.

We're down 7.5% in 24hrs Undecided


We?

I'm so down.



496. Post 9557814 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.32h):

Quote from: podyx on November 16, 2014, 05:15:01 AM
FOR FUK SAKE

had my leverage stop loss at the motherfucking bottom.

If you have to put your stops so tight, you're using too much leverage.



497. Post 12007038 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: Tzupy on July 30, 2015, 09:35:02 AM
I think this should count as bearish news:
http://www.coindesk.com/survey-consumers-bitcoin-inconvenient-checks/

Surprise surprise... a payment method that most people don't accept is viewed as inconvenient.



498. Post 12015253 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.22h):

Quote from: GaliX on July 31, 2015, 08:04:53 AM
But the more you understand the world around bitcoin, the more you should become disillusioned about bitcoin as a competitor to the traditional finance system. It is maybe better for a online payment system... But there is no REAL problem with the traditional Kredit-Card / PayPal /Skrill / SEPA system...

Quote
Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as trusted third parties to process electronic payments.   While the system works well enough for most  transactions, ...




except by the fees or when the gov block you from accessing bank stuff, like happened in Greece and other countries in different times


you know how expensive a bitcoin TX is without the subsidized Blockreward would be?
The ~50$ a current transaction costs makes the traditional system look cheap as fuck...


Somebody has to pay all the THs of mining power burning all the electricity 24/7...


https://blockchain.info/charts/cost-per-transaction

Your point still stands with the $10 the actual data shows...there is no reason to be hyperbolic.



499. Post 12184785 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Quote from: DonQuijote on August 19, 2015, 02:52:50 PM
I think XT won't be happening given the market uncertainty it caused.

Currently zero percent of the miner vote.

http://xtnodes.com/

Grab those those coins boys!

So if i start mining on XT, will the blocks be easier to find?

No.
Where can i see XT hash??
http://xtnodes.com/

Only one of the last thousand blocks has advertised XT compatibility.



500. Post 12250756 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on August 26, 2015, 06:42:20 PM
I thought this debate made it clear that no one w/ half a brain really cares about spending Bitcoin at online stores. If Bitpay decides for some reason to support Bitcoin XT then by all means go ahead. They'll be left with no users in no time. The economic majority (people who actually hold coins) couldn't care less what Bitpay decides to do, they're not trying to spend their coins anyway.
You obviously don't seem to understand the peculiarities of a fork here.
For anyone holding Bitcoins before the fork, there'd be a huge incentive to spend their coins on the chain they don't feel like supporting. After all, they would still hold all coins in their respective preferred chain, while at the same time, they could go shopping "for free" with their assumed worthless Altcoins. Basically, the more convinced you are that you're on the "right" side of the chain, the stronger your motivation to push the "wrong" side.

You obviously don't seem to understand the reality of what we have to deal with here.

The millions of coins held on cold storage and paper wallets will NEVER risk the security of their holdings by starting to shop their coins around in the event of a fork. That's just outrageous to say.

What it will do if two chains coexist for any significant length of time is create a premium on post fork coins.  Adding post fork coins to the transaction will taint it so that it can be spent on one chain only.  After that, you can freely spend on each fork separately.  Basically we break fungibility and confuse the shit out of anyone who doesn't understand the technical details.



501. Post 12258256 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: aztecminer on August 27, 2015, 03:09:40 PM
Was trading stopped on Bitfinex again?

There was a big gap when no trades occurred and all the other exchanges were trading during it. There have been so many gaps when trading was stopped on Bitfinex that I have come to expect it now.



the conversation with the bitfinex CTO yesterday night showed pretty clearly how incompetent they are. And as it seems there is no sign for it to get better anytime in the near future.

I don't understand why there are still so many people still stay there and exposing their self of getting screwed once we get some volatility again...



i heard a rumor this morning that 90% longs have opened on BFX in the last 12 hours.. that true ??

https://bfxdata.com/swaphistory/totals

no



502. Post 12262054 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: megadeth on August 28, 2015, 01:05:18 AM


... sounds like consensus to me, tally-ho game on.

Me as well, I like the fact that it was a quicke.

Gives inordinate power to miners.

You mean like the ability to decide which transactions to include and which blocks to build on?



503. Post 12300121 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: findftp on September 01, 2015, 03:28:39 PM
Every global stock and commodity is gapping down, bitcoin slightly rising.

Bullish.

have you every look at a graph ?

Bitcoin is far far far far away from slightly rising...

Yep I have.  Hashrate continuing to climb steadily as well.

Double bullish.

True diff is rocketing, what will happen if diff double from here to halving?

Bullish as hell  Shocked

I would not call this rocketing.



But hey, everything better than a fall.


Meh, we had a hashrate fall around the $2 bottom... then up to $260ish...  I say let's see miners capitulate.



504. Post 12305022 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: shmadz on September 02, 2015, 03:25:15 AM
Someone many pages back linked the Gavin interview, https://youtu.be/B8l11q9hsJM

Pay special attention at roughly 1:14:40 , the first and maybe only interesting question, let me paraphrase:

Brian: "so, if this fork succeeds, how will decisions be made in the future?"

Gavin: "Mike Hearn will be the benevolent dictator, he will be the ultimate decision maker."

...

He goes on to explain how he does not want to be in complete control, nor do any of the devs that currently have commit ability, but he is completely happy and ok with Mike as the sole controller and decider. He even goes in to mention that future changes will be much easier and will happen much more quickly once this change is made.

I know XT is already dead, but I just wanted to point out to anyone that was still unconvinced that Gavin has been compromised... He is either completely brain dead, or he is deliberately trying to end bitcoin's function as a permissionless, censorship-proof means of storing and transmitting value.

This is silly. What makes you think that people couldn't just as easily fork away from Hearn's XT?

The Core/XT devs are not the Federal Reserve Board, they serve at the behest of the miners and the community. Forking or threatening to fork is the only relief valve on their power.

BTW I agree that 75% of the network moving to BIP101 seems very unlikely now, but my above point remains.

"The path of lost freedom is a gradual, slippery slope; whilst the recovery of such is a brutal hill to climb."



Software stagnates without strong leadership to force a decision.  However, the freedom to fork cannot and will not be eroded.  Just go to the githhub page and click fork.  Make the  change Hearn has rejected and rally the community behind it.

A code base needs a maintainer but that maintainer's position is only secure for as long as they have the backing of the community.  This is how open source works.



505. Post 12314646 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 03, 2015, 05:11:10 AM

Many people mocked me many pages ago for my concern that the block size could not simply scale exponentially for the next 20 years, but I still believe we are reaching the limits of physics and any further significant exponential type gains in computing power beyond asic will likely take us beyond the singularity. I just hope our new synthetic overlords accept bitcoin. (Ok, yes, I've been watching too much humans (tv show))

Block size MUST scale exponentially whether it's simple or not. A crypto with a block size limit is analogous to an Internet with a bandwidth limit of 56K modems.  No video. No VOIP. Vastly more limited functionality.  It may be hard, but don't fucking tell me it's impossible. Some other crypto will do it if we don't.

You are clearly clueless about why the block size limit is necessary and there in the first place. Go back to your homeworks. First assignement:

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/007880.html

Code:
To elaborate, in my view there is a at least a two fold concern on this
particular ("Long term Mining incentives") front:

One is that the long-held argument is that security of the Bitcoin system
in the long term depends on fee income funding autonomous, anonymous,
decentralized miners profitably applying enough hash-power to make
reorganizations infeasible.

For fees to achieve this purpose, there seemingly must be an effective
scarcity of capacity.  The fact that verifying and transmitting
transactions has a cost isn't enough, because all the funds go to pay
that cost and none to the POW "artificial" cost; e.g., if verification
costs 1 then the market price for fees should converge to 1, and POW
cost will converge towards zero because they adapt to whatever is
being applied. Moreover, the transmission and verification costs can
be perfectly amortized by using large centralized pools (and efficient
differential block transmission like the "O(1)" idea) as you can verify
one time instead of N times, so to the extent that verification/bandwidth
is a non-negligible cost to miners at all, it's a strong pressure to
centralize.  You can understand this intuitively: think for example of
carbon credit cap-and-trade: the trade part doesn't work without an
actual cap; if everyone was born with a 1000 petaton carbon balance,
the market price for credits would be zero and the program couldn't hope
to share behavior. In the case of mining, we're trying to optimize the
social good of POW security. (But the analogy applies in other ways too:
increases to the chain side are largely an externality; miners enjoy the
benefits, everyone else takes the costs--either in reduced security or
higher node operating else.)

This area has been subject to a small amount of academic research
(e.g. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2400519). But
there is still much that is unclear.

The second is that when subsidy has fallen well below fees, the incentive
to move the blockchain forward goes away.  An optimal rational miner
would be best off forking off the current best block in order to capture
its fees, rather than moving the blockchain forward, until they hit
the maximum. That's where the "backlog" comment comes from, since when
there is a sufficient backlog it's better to go forward.  I'm not aware
of specific research into this subquestion; it's somewhat fuzzy because
of uncertainty about the security model. If we try to say that Bitcoin
should work even in the face of most miners being profit-maximizing
instead of altruistically-honest, we must assume the chain will not
more forward so long as a block isn't full.  In reality there is more
altruism than zero; there are public pressures; there is laziness, etc.

There will never be no limit.  Sure, we could remove the limit from consensus requirements (which I would actually support), but transactions still have a cost.  They have to be verified and then stored until all outputs are spent.  This requires storage hardware and bandwidth.  Also, larger blocks will be orphaned more frequently, providing additional pressure for miners to voluntarily keep blocks small.



506. Post 12317903 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: brg444 on September 03, 2015, 05:24:47 AM

Many people mocked me many pages ago for my concern that the block size could not simply scale exponentially for the next 20 years, but I still believe we are reaching the limits of physics and any further significant exponential type gains in computing power beyond asic will likely take us beyond the singularity. I just hope our new synthetic overlords accept bitcoin. (Ok, yes, I've been watching too much humans (tv show))

Block size MUST scale exponentially whether it's simple or not. A crypto with a block size limit is analogous to an Internet with a bandwidth limit of 56K modems.  No video. No VOIP. Vastly more limited functionality.  It may be hard, but don't fucking tell me it's impossible. Some other crypto will do it if we don't.

You are clearly clueless about why the block size limit is necessary and there in the first place. Go back to your homeworks. First assignement:

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/007880.html

Code:
To elaborate, in my view there is a at least a two fold concern on this
particular ("Long term Mining incentives") front:

One is that the long-held argument is that security of the Bitcoin system
in the long term depends on fee income funding autonomous, anonymous,
decentralized miners profitably applying enough hash-power to make
reorganizations infeasible.

For fees to achieve this purpose, there seemingly must be an effective
scarcity of capacity.  The fact that verifying and transmitting
transactions has a cost isn't enough, because all the funds go to pay
that cost and none to the POW "artificial" cost; e.g., if verification
costs 1 then the market price for fees should converge to 1, and POW
cost will converge towards zero because they adapt to whatever is
being applied. Moreover, the transmission and verification costs can
be perfectly amortized by using large centralized pools (and efficient
differential block transmission like the "O(1)" idea) as you can verify
one time instead of N times, so to the extent that verification/bandwidth
is a non-negligible cost to miners at all, it's a strong pressure to
centralize.  You can understand this intuitively: think for example of
carbon credit cap-and-trade: the trade part doesn't work without an
actual cap; if everyone was born with a 1000 petaton carbon balance,
the market price for credits would be zero and the program couldn't hope
to share behavior. In the case of mining, we're trying to optimize the
social good of POW security. (But the analogy applies in other ways too:
increases to the chain side are largely an externality; miners enjoy the
benefits, everyone else takes the costs--either in reduced security or
higher node operating else.)

This area has been subject to a small amount of academic research
(e.g. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2400519). But
there is still much that is unclear.

The second is that when subsidy has fallen well below fees, the incentive
to move the blockchain forward goes away.  An optimal rational miner
would be best off forking off the current best block in order to capture
its fees, rather than moving the blockchain forward, until they hit
the maximum. That's where the "backlog" comment comes from, since when
there is a sufficient backlog it's better to go forward.  I'm not aware
of specific research into this subquestion; it's somewhat fuzzy because
of uncertainty about the security model. If we try to say that Bitcoin
should work even in the face of most miners being profit-maximizing
instead of altruistically-honest, we must assume the chain will not
more forward so long as a block isn't full.  In reality there is more
altruism than zero; there are public pressures; there is laziness, etc.

There will never be no limit.  Sure, we could remove the limit from consensus requirements (which I would actually support), but transactions still have a cost.  They have to be verified and then stored until all outputs are spent.  This requires storage hardware and bandwidth.  Also, larger blocks will be orphaned more frequently, providing additional pressure for miners to voluntarily keep blocks small.

Did you bother reading this part?

Quote
The fact that verifying and transmitting transactions has a cost isn't enough, because all the funds go to pay that cost and none to the POW "artificial" cost; e.g., if verification costs 1 then the market price for fees should converge to 1, and POW cost will converge towards zero because they adapt to whatever is being applied. Moreover, the transmission and verification costs can be perfectly amortized by using large centralized pools (and efficient differential block transmission like the "O(1)" idea) as you can verify one time instead of N times, so to the extent that verification/bandwidth is a non-negligible cost to miners at all, it's a strong pressure to centralize.

This pressure for miners to keep blocks small is temporary and will eventually decline and disappear, it's already starting to seeing as numerous improvements have been made in improving general block propagation time between miners.

I read the whole thing.  I'll believe O (1) block propagation when I see an implementation  (or at least a reasonable explanation of how it could be implemented).

Besides, the vast majority of miners use pools anyway.  How would larger blocks change anything?



507. Post 12317953 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: fonsie on September 03, 2015, 11:37:51 AM
Food for thought:

If bitcoinXT doesn't get adopted it has proven that bitcoin will not be replaced by a better alt-coin.

No, it proves that Bitcoin will not be replaced by BitcoinXT.  Anything else is overgeneralization.



508. Post 12426619 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: TReano on September 15, 2015, 11:00:08 AM
I think it's a good sign that we are still holding at 230 knowing all the economic turmoil happening lately with many countries. Lets see where things will lead in the next 4 months.

there are currently no economic turmoil... We currently just have concerns because the growth especially of china is slowing down. They always had double digits growth and is now slowing down to 5-7%.. Once their GDP starts going negative, then we can start talking about economic turmoil..


Looks like bitcoin has had its prime time as it seems...

When global debt growth is more than global gdp growth, there is a problem.



509. Post 12854660 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: peonminer on November 02, 2015, 02:38:22 AM


You just lost your connection... refresh the page.

I see data for that period.



510. Post 12882579 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: btcbeliever on November 04, 2015, 01:37:54 PM

what does this look like with logarithmic scaling?

It isn't.  Check the y-axis.



511. Post 13160550 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: katastroffy on December 05, 2015, 10:56:45 PM
Didn't know lambie was buddhist

Nah, TheLamb's a neo-nazi, just like the rest of bitcoiners!

... retardation snipped ...


Please don't do that.



512. Post 13180941 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 08, 2015, 06:27:49 AM
why no one told me $gbtc closed at 520$  Shocked


That's an amazing price difference between gbtc and regular and real btc, and so far, I have not seen nor read any meaningful explanation regarding why such considerable price difference exists between gbtc and regular and real btc except that people (investors) are so BTC volatility adverse (shy) that they invest in some investment vehicle related to the stock market, gbtc, that they "know" - rather than one that they feel that they do not know, BTC.  h

however, ironically, the ongoing considerable price difference between gbtc and btc seems to create an additional uncertainty regarding the continued price "stability" of gbtc, which to anyone knowledgeable about BTC would rather own real btc rather than the paper imitation shit of gbtc... in spite of apparent arbitrage opportunities.

Keep in mind you can hold GBTC in your retirement account.  It is possible to set something up to accomplish the same thing with raw BTC, but it is way more hassle than it is worth unless you have a very large retirement account.



513. Post 13191383 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: chesthing on December 09, 2015, 06:09:59 AM
Just let me know when to dump this shit so I can buy the dump and repeat.  Wink

27 minutes.



514. Post 13191549 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: notme on December 09, 2015, 06:13:36 AM
Just let me know when to dump this shit so I can buy the dump and repeat.  Wink

27 minutes.

Time's up... make your move.



515. Post 13191604 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on December 09, 2015, 06:52:31 AM
billyjoe, y so mad bro?

I want my big blocks.  I want to show the world that we really have an antifragile network that is capable of adapting to new demands. I want users to come first, not miners. not developers. not middlemen.

Amen



516. Post 13200915 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 10, 2015, 03:35:44 AM
will 410 hold?

No, then yes, then no.



517. Post 13221082 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Patel on December 12, 2015, 02:13:32 AM
How is stamp/finex $40 over Huobi?  Huh

Normally its the opposite

It isn't.



518. Post 13222120 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: hendra147 on December 12, 2015, 05:24:07 AM
any news why bitcoin price down ?
im confusion some hour ago bitcoin buy wall very strong and im sure we can reach $500 '

but now bitcoin price fall Huh

Yes, it fell all the way to yesterday's price.  Surely we should all panic.



519. Post 13222146 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: hendra147 on December 12, 2015, 05:29:17 AM
any news why bitcoin price down ?
im confusion some hour ago bitcoin buy wall very strong and im sure we can reach $500 '

but now bitcoin price fall Huh

Yes, it fell all the way to yesterday's price.  Surely we should all panic.

any  connection with this article Huh?
3hours ago
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/falling-oil-prices-concerns-about-interest-rates-drag-stocks-down/2015/12/11/26492d3c-a03b-11e5-a3c5-c77f2cc5a43c_story.html

Probably not... nothing new there.



520. Post 13412704 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 31, 2015, 08:51:54 PM

Coke and Pepsi both provide rehydration and a sugar boost in pretty much identical quantities. The only difference between them is a slight flavor difference. IOW, they fulfill exactly the same use cases.


Pepsi has considerably more sugar, coke is far more acidic.  Both dehydrate you.

Coke is far more effective if you want to dissolve iron, so they do not similar for some use cases.



521. Post 13422169 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.39h):

Quote from: AlexGR on January 02, 2016, 01:31:20 AM

In that regard, there is no problem having varying opinions about the direction forward, but when several large block proponents argue like spoiled children regarding having to do x "right now," or everything is going to go to hell in a handbasket, it comes off as short-sighted at best and disingenuous at worse, because bitcoin is not broken at the moment, even though plans and measures do need to take place in order to scale and prepare for the future seemingly inevitable increases in transaction volume.

Meh, the big-blockers are mostly putting forward arguments and trying to actually do something about things.

Changing a variable from 1MB to 2MB or 20MB is not "work" per se. It's a few bytes of code change.

Trying to fit more data into the same 1MB is work. Trying to offload txs until they self-cancel, so that the network can scale better is work. Just upping a number is lame.

If the xt team actually wanted to make bitcoin scale better they should more actively develop solutions that allow this to happen by increasing transactions fitted per mb and it would probably be hailed by everyone (if it's safe and doesn't break everything). Raising the variable, I mean that's stuff that an automated shitcoin generator could be programmed to do on its own. How can that even classify as some kind of serious work.

"Please tell us the name of the shitcoin you are going to make"
"Please choose a hashing algorithm"
"Please choose block times"
"Please choose max number of coins"
"Please choose initial coins per block"
"Please choose how often subsidy will be cut by 50%"
"Please choose block size limit"

Voila.
Lightening as a network doesn't work without keeping private keys online.  That has always worked out so well.



522. Post 13610430 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on January 19, 2016, 09:43:21 PM
Gavin Andresen is part of bitcoinclassic?

everything feels so fucked up right now.

best be buying ALL the bitcoins.

Indeed... soon we will all have twice the coins Tongue



523. Post 13910995 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 17, 2016, 04:23:48 AM
In twenty minutes the next Gox creditors meeting starts and according to this reddit thread some kraken users have already had their Gox claims approved through it. One post in that reddit thread says all claims are in JPY. Does that mean the Gox coins will be auctioned or sold to pay the creditors in JPY?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4648wk/mtgox_bankruptcy_claims_the_trustee_has_approved/

Will all this Gox crap move the price?

Another huge uncertainty about to go away. Without the block size ring in the nose... this bull would be primed to go wild.

Add in the realization that gox has already been dumping... They have to know has many yen they have before they can divy it up.  A big supply source has just dried up.



524. Post 14088841 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on March 03, 2016, 11:25:28 PM
What is a make believe profits? 

Make-believe profits; adjective - noun [plural]; Investor's shrewd investment is worth less now vs when he made the investment. A complete fucking lack of profits.

What's the status of your portfolio?

None of your business.  Smiley

Have you ever provided any details in your BTC history in order to attempt to engage in a meaningful dialogue rather than vague pussified indirect innuendos?

No, see above. Meaningful dialogue without pointless bloviation, sounds refreshing.



@BMB - Next month, because soft fork = safe fork.  Smiley


How safe is it if it caused a hard fork on testnet?  How safe is it when the transactions created using the new features can be spent by anybody using the old rules.  That sounds like a s5rong incentive to lie about what you support to trigger activation and then sweep up a bunch of BTC as the transactions start coming in.



525. Post 14106594 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on March 05, 2016, 04:59:08 PM
Actually I remember now why I stopped daytrading. Just did 3 trades (sell/buy/sell) and paid $30 fees what makes 0$ win/loss lol. And so much stress for nothing... Is there any better trading platform than Bitstamp?

You can lose money much faster at bitfinex.com



526. Post 14106615 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: becoin on March 05, 2016, 05:00:57 PM
The Bitcoin core developers better wake the fk up, grow the fk up, and start working with those in touch with global business needs.  Or they will eventually (and very quickly) find themselves in the dustbin of Bitcoin History.
Every business that is build around free space on the bitcoin blockchain will eventually (and very quickly) find themselves in the dustbin of Bitcoin History.

Sure, they should not rely on free space.  But why do we need a centrally planned limit when miners are perfectly capable of determining their own costs and prioritizing transactions appropriately?



527. Post 14106907 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: becoin on March 05, 2016, 05:14:05 PM
The Bitcoin core developers better wake the fk up, grow the fk up, and start working with those in touch with global business needs.  Or they will eventually (and very quickly) find themselves in the dustbin of Bitcoin History.
Every business that is build around free space on the bitcoin blockchain will eventually (and very quickly) find themselves in the dustbin of Bitcoin History.

Sure, they should not rely on free space.  But why do we need a centrally planned limit when miners are perfectly capable of determining their own costs and prioritizing transactions appropriately?
There is no centrally planned limit. You're free to create a bitcoin fork with unlimited blocksize. Instead of whining here do it and you'll very quickly find out that you're wrong!
http://www.bitcoinunlimited.info/



528. Post 14258329 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: kurious on March 20, 2016, 12:48:26 PM
The wind has left this thread's sails. The action is spreading far and wide. Or going into hibernation.


Damn it!

I miss 'Chart Buddy' Sad


It followed Adam to a new thread elsewhere. It's still published, just not here.  Some people don't like censorship on principle. Richy is one of those people.



Elsewhere: https://bitco.in/forum/threads/wall-observer.27/



529. Post 14265933 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: DaRude on March 20, 2016, 10:34:35 PM
Quote is from Hearn's rage quit. By growth he's talking about giving free access to something that is limited in supply by design. Think it's obvious that it won't work. Make a block 80MB and if it's free (or almost free) to fill up someone will. Utilization can continue to grow even if it costs few cents extra for a space in a block.

It will never be free to fill up a block.  There is always a cost.  However, when the block is 1 MB and it is already close to full with normal transactions, the cost to fill it is affordable to some.  If the block is much larger, it would be much more expensive to fill it and cause transaction delays.  Miners will always set a minimum price/kb to include data in a block.



530. Post 14276842 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: DaRude on March 21, 2016, 04:52:37 AM
Quote is from Hearn's rage quit. By growth he's talking about giving free access to something that is limited in supply by design. Think it's obvious that it won't work. Make a block 80MB and if it's free (or almost free) to fill up someone will. Utilization can continue to grow even if it costs few cents extra for a space in a block.

It will never be free to fill up a block.  There is always a cost.  However, when the block is 1 MB and it is already close to full with normal transactions, the cost to fill it is affordable to some.  If the block is much larger, it would be much more expensive to fill it and cause transaction delays.  Miners will always set a minimum price/kb to include data in a block.

The argument is not that more space is bad. The argument is that at certain point the cost (in centralization) outweighs the benefit of trying to keep transactions few cents cheaper.

1mb is already filled up (arguably by spam but nevertheless) how long will it take to fill 2mb? Then 4mb if bitcoin will start to take off? Do you think that 8mb is viable? What about 16mb? At what size do you feel the size of the block will centralize the network to the point where you start to get worried and thinking that maybe letting satoshidice pay 2 cents per transaction is not worth it?

That is a question best left to the node operators.  Price should be determined by cost, not artificial scarcity.  Miners will only add a transaction if the transaction fee exceeds the cost of processing and storing the transaction.  Non-mining nodes already have the power to refuse to forward any transactions they feel shouldn't be included.

There is a lot of slack capacity.  Nodes mostly sit idle.  Remove the limit, or let it be adaptive and you will see the limit be determined by technological advancement.  Anything else is centralized economic planning.  Let the market find the optimal blocksize.



531. Post 14665773 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: jt byte on April 26, 2016, 03:06:54 AM
Bring up the price to $490 again. I want to see this go as high as it can until it hits the $500 wall like earlier this year.


What are you?  Ridiculous?

There's no $500 wall.  

Now, I know what you are talking about.  On November 4, 2015, the $502 was clearly a fast move upwards in which the total bitcoin community was not able to support such a quick uprising in prices or to sustain such a price at that time.  Such a supposed wall is not existent under the current circumstances.  

Good luck to you and anyone else who expects to find a wall at $500 and to profit by dumping before $500 this time around.
That is what I meant the resistance of getting past n staying above $500.
Not a wall  Lips sealed

Once we clear 480ish we will cut right through 500 without even blinking.  That said, we will probably consolidate for a little while at this level first.



532. Post 14675242 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: ImI on April 26, 2016, 08:59:29 PM
Why did I sell at 435? Sigh.

Bitcoin you crazy.

its not too late, seriously.

If this is the historical 3 many are assuming, 435 vs 470 won't hardly matter.



533. Post 15005036 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Alley on May 29, 2016, 02:00:26 AM
Is it not easy to arbiratige between china and Western exchanges?

Not in this direction.  Sure, you can sell high in china, but you can't get your money out of china as USD. If only someone had some business expenses they could pay in Yuan...



534. Post 15171665 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Denker on June 12, 2016, 06:37:22 AM
Oh MY GOD!!! Shocked
Morning gentlemen!
What a way to start a beautiful day right?!
What triggered the actual break out?

Somebody bought a lot of bitcoins.



535. Post 15230721 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 16, 2016, 05:31:02 AM
What is going on? This went mad so fast i can´t even believe it.

believe it, and dont sell, let the suckers try and "catch the top".

we have this expression for discouraging bottom fishing: " dont try to catch a falling knife "

maybe we need a new one for discouraging catching the top: " dont try and stop a rocket "


Due to the big BTC and GOLD rush, im afraid of something big going on globaly. Are there news about big catastrophic or war being declares?



http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2016-brexit-watch/

Brexit is looking more likely.

Also, oil is tanking again.



536. Post 15358385 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: InternationalBankAlliance on June 25, 2016, 01:35:33 PM
Right, so since we're on topic how many gun related deaths happen in US and how many in France?  

Banning cars could markedly reduce the incidence of death by vehicle. But beware, someone might still be able to buy a multi-tonne missile (car) on the black market tho.

Personal liberty and responsibility has its blood price. Same for the lack thereof.

If cars were specifically designed to kill people, as guns are, how long do you think it would take for them to get banned?

That said, cars are one of the most highly regulated consumer goods in US. One needs a license to operate a car, the car itself must have a valid vin & be registered, inspected yearly, and, in most places, insured. The car must comply with all sorts of DOT regulations (safety equipment, emissions, etc.), and draconian traffic laws (speed limits, can't drive drugged/drunk, can't run stop signs, etc.).

I love both cars and guns to bits, and don't mind ridiculous analogies, but let's be real here.
*The volume is rather disappointing. We have only so much time to capitalize on brexit, and that window is closing fast.

@yefi, The UK may have committed 'an act of economic self-harm with global ramifications'

No need to run away from home just to hurt your father Smiley

1. Guns are far more often used to kill food.
2. Non of those vehicle regulations apply to farm-use vehicles.  They only come into play if you want to take you vehicle onto public roads.



537. Post 15358765 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: InternationalBankAlliance on June 25, 2016, 02:18:28 PM
Right, so since we're on topic how many gun related deaths happen in US and how many in France?  

Banning cars could markedly reduce the incidence of death by vehicle. But beware, someone might still be able to buy a multi-tonne missile (car) on the black market tho.

Personal liberty and responsibility has its blood price. Same for the lack thereof.

If cars were specifically designed to kill people, as guns are, how long do you think it would take for them to get banned?

That said, cars are one of the most highly regulated consumer goods in US. One needs a license to operate a car, the car itself must have a valid vin & be registered, inspected yearly, and, in most places, insured. The car must comply with all sorts of DOT regulations (safety equipment, emissions, etc.), and draconian traffic laws (speed limits, can't drive drugged/drunk, can't run stop signs, etc.).

I love both cars and guns to bits, and don't mind ridiculous analogies, but let's be real here.
*The volume is rather disappointing. We have only so much time to capitalize on brexit, and that window is closing fast.

@yefi, The UK may have committed 'an act of economic self-harm with global ramifications'

No need to run away from home just to hurt your father Smiley

1. Guns are far more often used to kill food.
2. Non of those vehicle regulations apply to farm-use vehicles.  They only come into play if you want to take you vehicle onto public roads.

1. What do you hunt with a handgun? Or an AR, which is what's being discussed here? No one is trying to regulate shotguns or hunting rifles.
2. Farm-use vehicles are used to make food. Think shotgun, which I could buy in many states by walking into a store and showing my ID.
I can also buy an AR by simply walking into a store and showing my ID.

@yefi, well yeah, self-harm is like that, you can't bring back suicides. I guess that's a win in your book?

Well than talk about assault rifles, not guns.  There was no mention of AR15s or assault rifles in to post I was replying to.  You'll have much better luck if you don't lump all guns together.



538. Post 15372368 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: ImI on June 26, 2016, 05:26:23 PM
Back to fundamentals

There are about $43.7MM swaps borrowed just on finex. Conservatively at current daily rate of 0.06% That's $2.6MM just in daily fees only on Finex

Check your math.

 Grin

Hey, $26,000 is pretty close to $2,600,000...



539. Post 15526811 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Um.... why is the reward on the last two blocks 16.66666666?  Did someone forget how to divide by 2?



540. Post 15889174 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on August 11, 2016, 06:19:28 AM
How are you guys with Bitfinex withdrawals? Any of you got your money out of that mess?
According to coinmarketcap Bitfinex had a 38000 BTC trading volume in the last 24hrs
That's really nothing for finex


It took 9 hours but my withdrawal came through.  I made it out with everything I put in - 0.05 btc.  I lost quite a bit of profit, but this worked out much better than how gox went down.  Luckily, I don't keep much in exchanges anyway.



541. Post 16352948 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on September 23, 2016, 05:12:58 PM
Adam hasn't posted in a week and a half. That's a long time for him.

I  hope he's OK.

He's fine: https://bitco.in/forum/threads/wall-observer.27/page-119



542. Post 16600442 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: NiceSoft12 on October 18, 2016, 03:14:20 AM
Geez its tanking again.... had thought this might be a good time to enter in a position last week.... when will the bubble form again  Huh Huh

WTF are you talking about?  We are only $6 below the recent high and still $20 above where we were a week ago.



543. Post 16693162 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: hv_ on October 26, 2016, 07:35:08 PM
We have only seen higher prices than today's for something like 10 weeks in bitcoins' entire history.

In what currency?

In GBP, JPY or CNY it close to ATH...

What are you talking about? 4000 is not close to 8000.

http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/okcoinCNY#tgSzm1g10zm2g25zv



544. Post 16718090 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: St.Stephan on October 29, 2016, 06:38:14 AM
The dollar has to be lower just in order to be realistic about its current worth.

Incorrect. The dollar will go to ATHs in 2017 or 2018, for the reason I told you (which comes from Armstrong).

It must go sky high to totally break the global economy into an abyss, which will then destroy the dollar and usher in the new global monetary reset with Asia leading the way coming out of their bottom 2020.

You've got to understand Armstrong's thesis about the $11 trillion dollar global short position and the international capital flows into the safe haven reserve currency as the crisis elevates into total chaos and war every where. Later the dollar will peak due to killing the global economy, and that is when you want to have gold.

For now, you want the dollar, US stocks, and Bitcoin. Later in 2017/18, you want to transition to gold.

It is still possible for gold to sell off to $850 as the dollar rally and US stock market rallies accelerate due to the rush to a safe haven. The world is not yet really to admit it is totally fucked and move to gold. That will come later. You will see a double in the US stock market over the next 2 years. Probably a triple or more in Bitcoin. Gold will go down.

The thread moderator ( @adamstgBit ) deleted a huge swath of discussion, some of which you can find else where.

Thought his nick was hacked and he was locked out??

Yep.  Last active September 14th: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=23281



545. Post 17142474 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: DaRude on December 10, 2016, 08:33:30 AM
i want to go on a bit of a rant.
its not price related but here's the chart anyway.

what would be best for bitcoin right now is unity.image core devs and bu devs and Gavin! coming out of the wood work all collaborating to give us segwit + free market BlockSize. that IMO is gold. that will yield small reasonable blocks size increases along side a LN network cooking to perfection. this outcome would yield 32,000$ a coin.. admit it. fight for this outcome. run a BU client if for no other reason as to express your desire for more diversified set of bitcoin BIPs on the table at any one time.
anyway you look at it bitcoin is a buy right now, if it go segwit if it goes bu if it dose both in short order and then some.
time is now.
buy.


Nope. Having no restriction on a size of a block chain is suicide! If core goes full retard and actually try that i'm shorting BTC getting some popcorn and will watch that dumb ass idea collapse on itself in fireworks.

But don't let that discourage you. You go ahead and keep on shilling, BTW i like the rebranding from unlimited blocks to "free market BlockSize" how about "BestFlexibleBlocksThatSaveChildrenAndEndWars BlockSize"TM  Grin you too funny, but you try too hard

Allowing block size to be determined by emergent consensus is not the same as no restriction.  There are some issues surrounding the security implications of having potential time periods where multiple chains are competing because one has a block bigger than a large segment of miners will accept immediately.  But to portray it as no restriction on block size just shows how little you understand about the BU proposal.



546. Post 17177532 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: unknown04 on December 14, 2016, 04:53:17 AM
$777 is the new $666, what a coincidence Cheesy

I wish I bought more during $666.... regretted.. I'm too afraid to buy more now. It's expensive and not sure if I can make profit..

You probably felt the same way at $666.



547. Post 17177763 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 14, 2016, 05:29:22 AM
$777 is the new $666, what a coincidence Cheesy

I wish I bought more during $666.... regretted.. I'm too afraid to buy more now. It's expensive and not sure if I can make profit..

You probably felt the same way at $666.


Probably felt the same way at $222, $333, $444 and $555, too,,,  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

you guys are right... when it's $888 I would be saying the same. At the end of the day, I missed all out.

You don't have to invest your life savings all at once.

Just dollar cost average invest into bitcoin with what you can afford, whether that is $10 per month or $400 per week or $100 per day.. or $1 per day.  There are a lot of ways to invest an amount that is comfortable and should not cause regrets, as long as you try to apportion it to your own personal financial situation.

For example, I am a kind of cautious person when it comes to investing, and it took me more than a year to establish my initial investment stake into bitcoin and to achieve a kind of feeling of comfort that I had a decent stake in bitcoin that was proportionate to my overall view of the investment (in contrast with and proportioned to other investments that I had at that time in light of my timeline and other personal circumstances)

Yep... the best part about bitcoin markets is the percentage fees instead of the flat fees you see in traditional markets.  It is reasonable to buy in very small lots.



548. Post 17187819 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: duke944 on December 15, 2016, 02:55:24 AM
I'm still here.  Grin Bitcoin is the biggest scam in human history. It may go much higher, but when it crashes it will create the biggest losses ever. Warren Buffet has said there is no value in bitcoin. You think you are smarter than the greatest fundamental trader in history?

When/where did he say that?  Please provide your source.  The only comment I've ever heard from him on bitcoin is that he doesn't invest in things he doesn't understand.  I doubt he has had a reason to take the time to understand what bitcoin is, which would be a prerequisite for him to declare there is no value in it.  He's not the kind of person to make such statements lightly.



549. Post 17224799 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Holliday on December 18, 2016, 10:43:04 AM
[...]
If it's "fairly obvious", show us some evidence at least.

That's the catch with censorship.

If big blockers are censored, explain how this guy gets a free pass to start new threads daily and bump old ones on a regular basis.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=196289

As posted at bitco.in, this is a snapshot of adam's inbox:


https://bitco.in/forum/threads/gold-collapsing-bitcoin-up.16/page-842#post-31104

I can confirm that I also had two posts discussing segwit deleted from this thread on the 25th.  I wasn't even discouraging it, just trying to explain some of the opinions I've heard over on that other forum.  We will never be able to reach consensus if discussion is not allowed.



550. Post 17224930 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Lauda on December 18, 2016, 07:31:12 PM
I can confirm that I also had two posts discussing segwit deleted from this thread on the 25th.  I wasn't even discouraging it, just trying to explain some of the opinions I've heard over on that other forum.  We will never be able to reach consensus if discussion is not allowed.
How about you start actually behaving like adults and follow the forum rules? You're discussing solutions on a technical basis which has nothing to do with this thread, nor this section. I have tried keeping such discussion, regardless of whether positive or negative, and Segwit/BU/whatever out of this thread.

Regarding the poll: I have removed it as it was really outdated. There is no way to add one as a moderator AFAIK (which is unfortunate since OP's account is inactive).

This used to be a fun place to hang out and shoot the breeze with whatever topics were tangentially related to bitcoin and its price.  Because of your (not just you, the entire moderation team seems to be on the same page) opinion that the most important discussion in the community is off topic, many posters have left and those that remain self censor most of the time.

Yet, all of the anti-semitic hate speech is just fine.

I just don't understand how the issues surrounding the scalability of bitcoin are off topic, particularly in this lounge-esque thread.



551. Post 17225069 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Lauda on December 18, 2016, 07:44:04 PM
Read:


If you want to discuss Segwit or other technical stuff, then 'Bitcoin Discussion' is more appropriate for this kind of discussion (other sections may be as well, but the thread would be moved to the right one in that case). Also keep in mind that I can not keep reading all of the posts made here, thus please use the report function.

I disagree that bitcoin price exists as an isolated thing.  Sure, TA and chart patterns have an influence, but fundamentals matter as well.  Sentiment regarding different scaling solutions effects general market sentiment.  Additionally, censoring such discussion only contributes to the myth that moderators here are unfairly targeting big blockers.



552. Post 17225116 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Holliday on December 18, 2016, 07:50:34 PM
So what? I've had just as many posts, speaking out against big blocks, deleted from this thread. It has nothing to do with big/small blocks and everything to do with being off-topic. Pretty much all of my posts that have received moderation over the years come from the wall observer thread. It's nothing new.
I have tried to keep an equal and impartial moderation stance (regardless of my views) as much as possible. Keep in mind that I'm not the only moderator who can delete posts here (before someone jumps to any conclusion with specific examples).

I'm not complaining. Like I said, I know I'm posting off-topic. I just can't help it sometimes (especially in this thread).

That's just it.  There used to be nothing off topic here.  It was a lounge.  That atmosphere has been killed and now it is a much less enjoyable thread to participate in.  Intelligent discourse has died off and we are left with trolling and people spreading FUD.

I will admit that bitcointalk has grown quite a bit over time and maybe that is most of the problem since you have to keep a much larger herd from stampeding.  But it just sucks that this place is nothing like it was a few years ago.  I really liked that place.



553. Post 17248009 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Where's the volume?



554. Post 17248815 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: duke944 on December 21, 2016, 02:23:32 AM
bitcoin rise is great if you sell when high, not wait until it's too late - then the rise meant nothing.

But what if you think you are selling high and a week later your sell price looks low?



555. Post 17260256 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 22, 2016, 04:36:21 AM
on another note, why is stamp consistently above finex? that never used to be the case, did something trivial change here? has it been this way since finex got hacked?

i haven't been paying close attention to the variation among exchanges for quite a long time. stamp would always lag below the other exchanges.


I think that some of the dynamics at Finex has changed a little, but those dynamics may work themselves out over the coming months... At least, I hope that they do.

In the past several hours; however, there have been several times that walls of coins have been put up at $839, and currently at $844  (200 to 500 coins), and I am not sure if there are just too many coins on bitfinex and not enough cash - since, possibly, some of the bigger whales may have decided to pull some of their cash off of the exchange, and you know how much easier it is to move coins rather than cash.. so when push comes to shove, there may be a much easier ability to move coins to bitfinex rather than cash and there are not enough folks on bitfinex storing cash..   i am kind of guessing on this point based on what could be a kind of feasible scenario.

I believe that margin trading is still disabled.  Much of the cash stored on finex was there to server as margin for long BTC positions.  Without that fat interest rate many people probably moved their funds elsewhere.



556. Post 17260944 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 22, 2016, 06:35:49 AM
850  Cool

China broke 6000 CNY and jumped up nearly 1% in minutes.



557. Post 17272141 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 23, 2016, 04:15:23 AM
Ok, fine. I'm here. Now what?

BULLISH

confirmed



558. Post 17272323 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: DaRude on December 23, 2016, 05:17:31 AM
Soon.

Whoa it is like 2013, just need rpietila and his castles now

He has his own wall observer thread now: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400235.msg17227994#msg17227994



559. Post 17272386 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 23, 2016, 05:29:48 AM
pre-2012 reunion here? I'll bite.

now you're making me feel bad.

i lurked from late 2012, didn't make an account until 2013.

but i'm still OLD SCHOOL GOD DAMMIT

Shit son.  I registered this account in 2011 and it was my second account (I lost my first one after bitcointalk was hacked).



560. Post 17299634 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on December 25, 2016, 10:23:53 PM
Well, head and shoulders chart pattern complete... resume uptrend. And.. that's what looks to be happening.

We'll be back over 900 next week. Could see 1000 fall in 2016 yet!
Um, head and shoulders are bearish, no?  

I am still quite bullish for the upcoming week though.  There is greed in the air, but given the long winter, it seems more likely to be spring than the end of summer.

Yeah.  There was a tiny one on the 30 minute charts that played out already.  Just noise if you zoom out a bit.



561. Post 17308585 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: hulla on December 26, 2016, 09:14:54 PM
Xmas correction to 860$ and then rocket goes to moon?
Is not even $860. It was $800 and now the price it going $900 cos the current price is $899. Rocket does go to the moon Smiley

I hope it comes back to $800 for some time, I'm prepared to purchase more of bitcoins for $800, but not for more than that. Roll Eyes

Bitcoin is sustaining the price of $899-$900 today by the way.

The prediction says the price will rise above $1000 next year. So, I think you're a lil late for that. Though the current price is $888 and that because of the Christmas holiday.

See, it was $900 yesterday, today it is $867, I still think that it is going to calm down for a day, before even the new year, will go down to somewhat like $800-$825 before January. That'll be the best time to get some more of it.
Yes,it will calm down due to the holiday but it won't settle down at the price of $800-$825 and if you said $850 I will say you're correct. But at the price of $800-$825? Nah

prices remain bullish as discussed in our bullbear analytics forecast
Hmm. That's cute and the prediction was absolutely right cos bitcoin does have a sharp increase in price and the current price now is $901 Smiley Who was the so call bullbear?

He runs a subscription service that he advertises every chance he gets.  If you would like to pay someone to tell you how to feel about the charts, he's your guy.



562. Post 17318110 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on December 27, 2016, 07:37:03 PM
Surely 10k is realistic in the future? That's always been my target. Even then, selling may not even be necessary.

At the very least an exchange to a different cryptocurrency will likely be necessary.  It is doubtful that BTC will be able to handle enough transaction volume to become a widely used transactional currency.  BTC's primary role will be store of value and settlement.  Less secure networks will be used for small value transactions due to lower fees.



563. Post 17318183 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 27, 2016, 07:40:35 PM
anyone got the data for finex shorts+longs?

bfxdata.com
or
bitfinex.com/stats



564. Post 17319926 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: rokkyroad on December 27, 2016, 10:44:00 PM
"You've got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em,"

All I know is bitcoin experiences great pumps and spectacular dumps. I would be surprised if this was not the case this time.

I can picture all those who held coins from the epic pump of 2013 waiting for ROI. Fingers resting on triggers.

All it takes is for some of the big boys to pull triggers and all hell breaks loose.

Sorry to put a damper on the Holiday joy but we need to be realistic. We are on thin ice.

Hope I'm wrong and bitcoin keeps surging ahead.







Hey look, I hit quote and didn't delete the 6 line breaks after your text.



565. Post 17320363 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: yefi on December 28, 2016, 12:14:23 AM
I can picture all those who held coins from the epic pump of 2013 waiting for ROI. Fingers resting on triggers.

Can you, because I can't? How many of these strange and incredible people who defy normal human psychology do you envisage?

Counting today, 5 of the top 20 days in bitcoin history for BTCUSD price have been the past 5 days.  Only 8 days have been higher than current prices.  It doesn't seem like there would be a large group of people who bought on those 8 days and decided to wait 3 years to see if bitcoin could recover.



566. Post 17358406 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: nanobtc on December 31, 2016, 07:11:31 PM
Microsoft putting Bitcoin support into Office 365:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/five-office-365-features-horizon-2017-martin-butler

But....but... but.. why would they do that, if Bitcoin isn't the future?  Isn't Bitcoin that terrorist/drug monopoly money that the governments of the world will all outlaw soon?  /s

That's great news, that MS is acknowledging BTC. Don't jump to the conclusion that Microsoft itself is accepting BTC, it just means that Excel numerical formats now include BTC. Not directed at you, Torque, but subsequent posters may have been leaning that way.

2. Bitcoin currency support
In 2017, Excel will be able to recognize, format, calculate, and analyze numbers expressed in Bitcoin currency. The new feature will be available for Excel running under Windows 10, Android, Mac OS, and iOS, and will include Excel Mobile versions as well..

Microsoft has been accepting Bitcoin for literally years.
https://commerce.microsoft.com/PaymentHub/Help/Right?helppagename=CSV_BitcoinHowTo.htm



567. Post 17359391 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on December 31, 2016, 07:59:26 PM
01000010 01110101 01111001 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101110 01100101 01111000 01110100 00100000 00110111 00100000 01101000 01101111 01110101 01110010 01110011 00101110 00100000 00110001 00110000 01110000 00100000 01000101 01010011 01010100 00100000 01010010 01101111 01100011 01101011 01100101 01110100 00100000 01001100 01100001 01110101 01101110 01100011 01101000







Fueling in progress Wink.



568. Post 17401634 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: BTCtrader71 on January 05, 2017, 01:00:51 AM
You point at the moon, I look at your finger. But I'm trying to see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDW6vkuqGLg
Go to 1:15

Protip:
https://youtu.be/sDW6vkuqGLg?t=75



569. Post 17401863 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on January 05, 2017, 02:01:25 AM
It's nice to see how this tiny (so far) period of consolidation is shaping up.

Bearstamp is forming a nice pennant centered around approximately $1110, preparing for the next leg up.

Finex bounces up and down a little but with a slight upward bias.

Meanwhile Huobi doesn't give a shit and keeps surging upward, creating a series of new ATHs. Still no correction at Huobi.

All signs point to continuing sustained growth, no bubbles yet.

There's corrections... you just have to watch the 1 minute charts Tongue.



570. Post 17402257 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on January 05, 2017, 02:56:07 AM
Most people who book profit too early in a bubble end up being tempted to buy back in as they watch incredulously at a seemingly impossible rise. Even the great Newton wasn't immune to this.



There must have been people who sold at $140 at the start of the 2013 rally because the price had quickly doubled up from $70. Afterwards the best chance of buying back in they would get is at about $200 over a year later. 

I don't want to talk about how many I sold at $3 because the price had tripled.  I was going to be making huge profits on my GPU mining at $1, so there was no way $3 was sustainable.   Cry



571. Post 17402918 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: 2017Bubble on January 05, 2017, 04:49:32 AM
WTF is wrong with bitstamp?
China wants fomo but rest of western exchanges are not dooing much.

People are sleeping?



572. Post 17402993 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 05, 2017, 04:58:06 AM
WTF is wrong with bitstamp?
China wants fomo but rest of western exchanges are not dooing much.

People are sleeping?

Seeing as it is 1pm in China I am going with 'no'

Bitstamp is not in China.



573. Post 17403121 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: coolbeans94 on January 05, 2017, 05:19:19 AM
8,800 Incoming... I said it before, and say it again:

Indicators are meaningless when the Chinese are just printing fiat money infinitely. You have to keep in mind the Chinese have been printing unlimited amounts of fiat at a faster pace than anyone else, but try to prevent it from leaving the country on the official fiat money exchange rates. They will try to maintain a fiat exchange rate fix as long as possible, so they maintain purchasing power, but it is really just like Monopoly money to them. Bitcoin/crypto may be a way of escape.


8,800? I mean why not right?

Might as well go for 8888.



574. Post 17403273 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: notme on January 05, 2017, 05:22:41 AM
8,800 Incoming... I said it before, and say it again:

Indicators are meaningless when the Chinese are just printing fiat money infinitely. You have to keep in mind the Chinese have been printing unlimited amounts of fiat at a faster pace than anyone else, but try to prevent it from leaving the country on the official fiat money exchange rates. They will try to maintain a fiat exchange rate fix as long as possible, so they maintain purchasing power, but it is really just like Monopoly money to them. Bitcoin/crypto may be a way of escape.


8,800? I mean why not right?

Might as well go for 8888.




575. Post 17403321 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Torque on January 05, 2017, 05:45:58 AM
I smell conspiracy.  Naked short selling at Stamp to hold down price? They are Coinbase's main exchange, amiright?

Nope.  Coinbase has their own exchange now: https://gdax.com



576. Post 17403936 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Call me crazy, but I think we consolidate here for 12 - 36 hours.  Momentum is sapped for now.  I took out a small short position @1150 with a trailing stop.  Time to sleep.  After the markets rest, we can start the FOMO.



577. Post 17404057 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on January 05, 2017, 07:37:34 AM
Call me crazy, but I think we consolidate here for 12 - 36 hours.  Momentum is sapped for now.  I took out a small short position with a trailing stop.  Time to sleep.  After the markets rest, we can start the FOMO.

I hear you but tough call to say the Chinese honey badger is sated.  I made the same call yesterday at the same time but turned out to just be badger nap time.  

https://twitter.com/bbands/status/816717439853424640

China shows 3 pushes to new highs with declining momentum each time (over the past 12 hours, easiest to see on 15 minute charts).  It just made a similar 3 push move on smaller time frames ending in a double top around the psychological barrier of 8888.  It's already starting to turn down.  If I'm wrong, I lose what I made with long positions tonight.  If I'm right, I can double or triple what I made.  Either way, the vast majority of my stash is safe and sound.

Good night and good luck Smiley



578. Post 17406875 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: notme on January 05, 2017, 07:25:15 AM
Call me crazy, but I think we consolidate here for 12 - 36 hours.  Momentum is sapped for now.  I took out a small short position @1150 with a trailing stop.  Time to sleep.  After the markets rest, we can start the FOMO.

Stopped out at 1082 for around a 10% gain.  Too bad I didn't have the guts to leave it naked.



579. Post 17425311 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: orpington on January 07, 2017, 01:01:34 AM
if only there was some kind of sign that the dumping was done and the cost was clear...

Could somebody please step in and officially declare this dump to be over?

Would make my life much easier. lol

You're good... Buy



580. Post 17430079 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: rebel69 on January 07, 2017, 01:33:28 PM
where could i find these btc charts?

cryptowat.ch
bitcoinwisdom.com
bitcoincharts.com
bitcoinaverage.com

But, based on your previous posts, my recommendation would be to pick a dollar (or whatever your local currency is) amount you can afford to lose and buy that much each week.  Don't look at the charts other than on your purchase day for a year.  By that time, you should have a decent position in the green and a better feel for how this market moves.  Until then, just stick to a simple plan.



581. Post 17437107 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: wutizurkwest on January 08, 2017, 06:25:05 AM


Definitely.  The question is... bulltrap or beartrap?



582. Post 17445328 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: keyboard warrior on January 08, 2017, 11:08:24 PM
Despite the fact the correction was due, the media created some China bans bitcoin hysteria at exactly the same time as the correction. It most likely drove the price down further, and for longer than it would have done.

The first time the China bans bitcoin story was published in 2014 it undoubtedly caused a massive crash. This time it might not have caused the crash, but it put people off buying back in until they were sure it was bullshit.

Crashes cause news as people try to rationalize price action.  News doesn't cause crashes.  If price hadn't been falling, people would have taken the time to understand it was BS before they spread it.  But they didn't because it was a narrative that fit what they were seeing in the markets.



583. Post 17460238 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

First sell off / bear trap.  Return to normal will come much later.



584. Post 17468101 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: eddie13 on January 11, 2017, 05:49:38 AM


The lines on your 1 minute chart already broke.  Big surprise.



585. Post 17478025 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Paashaas on January 12, 2017, 03:31:10 AM
China got to much power, the whole world is depending whats happening up there..When does Japan, India ore the West stepping in?

No more fake volume, China Bans on a regular base, it's time for Bitcoin to grow up Undecided

I mean no offense, but I've seen this mistake several times lately.

ore (noun) -> a naturally occurring solid material from which a metal or valuable mineral can be profitably extracted
or (conjunction) -> used to link alternatives



586. Post 17489431 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Holliday on January 13, 2017, 04:26:55 AM
if we assume a government has "banned bitcoin traffic" ( not sure how feasible that is )
then we should limit blocksize such that we can smuggle blocks in and out of that country?
we need to keep blocksize such that it can be carried on some hypothetical "internet de la resistance"

idk... sounds nutty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_packet_inspection


If you wrap the protocol in SSL and run it on port 443 then it is indifferentiable from HTTPS.

Quote
i think you have reason to want small blocks, but you have no good reason to not allow the network of nodes to determine what "small" is.
BU effectively limits block size to whatever the vast majority of nodes consider acceptable, and allows for nodes to continue to protest bigger block while staying synced and not forked.
let it go, you can't impose your view of bitcoin onto everyone else even if you believe "its for there own good"

you should however keep running core if you like the idea of segwit and static blocksize.

I don't know where you get the idea that I want to "impose" anything on anyone since I've been asking big blockers to make a block bigger than 1MB for ages. The two sides of this debate will never see eye to eye. A hard fork is the only solution where both sides end up happy. As soon as BU makes a block bigger than 1MB this debate will end.

A hard fork will end the debate over the technical details, but it will start the debate about who gets to be called Bitcoin.  That's where it will get really ugly.



587. Post 17518081 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: the artful bodger on January 15, 2017, 08:19:11 PM





588. Post 17528478 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: spooderman on January 17, 2017, 04:40:07 AM
don't worry bears, there's no WAY there isn't going to be another annoying dump.

900 was assassinated less than a week ago.

so it seems fitting to stay well below it for a while.

which we won't do.

but when we go above it, we'll get smacked back i imagine.

anyone got any LEGIT TA for us?

Down (hourly), then up (daily).



589. Post 17529268 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on January 17, 2017, 07:21:57 AM
Wow it's going up fast what's going on?
People are buying
And people aren't selling.



590. Post 17529298 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on January 17, 2017, 07:23:30 AM
Wow it's going up fast what's going on?
People are buying
And people aren't selling.

Actually they are, that's how the people buy in the first place..... Roll Eyes

For price to move up, there has to be more buyers at the current price than sellers.



591. Post 17529379 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on January 17, 2017, 07:36:00 AM

Wow it's going up fast what's going on?
People are buying
And fewer people are n't selling.

FTFY

Thank you for your pedantic lesson on market mechanics.  Can we get back to posting rockets and trains now?



592. Post 17529398 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):




593. Post 17529709 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Payload delivered... time for this:




594. Post 17668638 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 30, 2017, 03:35:13 AM
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/5qwtr2/bitcoincom_loses_132btc_trying_to_fork_the/

want to blow some serious money on bitcoin mining? ... join a BU pool  Cheesy


That is fucking ridiculous.

I hope that innocent folks did not lose any money because of that kind of bullshit coming out of the BU camp.

You can just listen to some of the nonsense that Roger Ver spouts out to recognize that he is way too emotional about things and he just wants to get his way and to cause disruption (even though he may honestly believe what he is attempting to do is for the good of bitcoin).

I'm sure they have ... and it's a lot more money than just this 13.2 BTC because all the hashpower spent working on blocks >1Mbyte would have been totally wasted for any pool running this BU code.

They were buying tickets for a fantasy lottery that never existed ... tens of thousands of dollars worth of tickets probably .... power company and Antminer says thank you    Cheesy


If it is just get rich quick schemes and emotional reactions, then probably, we don't need to feel sorry for those kinds of folks who may have lost money because they are engaging in a risky business, but if actual innocent people lost money because of orphaned blocks or something like that, then what can be done?

I might not be technically aware enough, but isn't it possible that some innocent folks could have gotten screwed on some bitcoin transaction that got orphaned.. or am I misunderstanding the situation?


If the BU blocks where orphaned, then the transactions they contained were either included in the competing fork that one out, or they got put back into the mempool and made it into later blocks.  No transactions would have been lost.  Of course, why learn how transaction processing works before you go spout off about the irresponsibility of one of the groups actually working to increase transaction throughput.



595. Post 17668910 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

It is just another orphaned block.  There is an average of one every other day: https://blockchain.info/charts/n-orphaned-blocks?daysAverageString=7

Someone took a risk and set their blocksize larger than 1mb.  It was a foolish thing to do with the current state of the blocksize debate, but it only hurt the miner who chose that setting.  If that someone was running a pool, their users also lost out.  Said users will likely find a different pool if this pool doesn't fix their settings.

How you go from this situation to railing about "bullshit coming out of the BU camp" just unveils your ignorance of how things work.  It is foolish to fight something you don't understand.

Hey look, I can say whatever the fuck I want too.... of course both of our posts will probably be deleted for being off topic before the day is up.



596. Post 17669236 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 30, 2017, 06:08:31 AM

How you go from this situation to railing about "bullshit coming out of the BU camp" just unveils your ignorance of how things work.  



This is just one example of bullshit coming out of the BU camp.  There are other examples as well, but there is also no real need to go into detail about other examples.



How about we do, since this is the root of my measure of proportion?  From my standpoint, you smeared BU based on a misunderstanding of the situation.  Obviously, you have some additional beef with the project that led you to make negative assumptions.  Maybe if you aired it, I could better understand your position.

Miners already have the power to change blocksize by recompiling the code.  All BU does is remove that artificial barrier and make it clear that blocksize is a parameter that the market will decide on, not some cabal of self-anointed developers.



597. Post 17669379 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 30, 2017, 06:26:47 AM

I am also of the understanding that seg wit is a much better solution for a lot of matters and should be the next step, rather than rushing into BU when there does not really appear to be a need for it, not at the moment.. and seg wit is a better next step (at this time).


What problems does segwit solve?

Today, you can already drop the signatures from your storage layer after validating them if you want to.

Even if there are some advantages to segwit, implementing it as a soft fork is dangerous.  It lets old clients think they are fully validating when they aren't.  If you are going to require 95%, you might as well hard fork and force outdated clients off the network.  Of course, the first time an old client mines a block that spends a segwit transaction under the old definition of the anyone can spend opcode you'll have a hard fork anyway (which will again just be an orphaned block since the segwit network will easily outpace the non-segwit network).



598. Post 17669425 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on January 30, 2017, 06:26:47 AM
You may be correct.. no harm, no foul.. but my understanding is that there is a reason for blocksize limits, and some of it has to do with bloat and bandwith, etc etc..

The reason for the blocksize limit is that at the time it was implemented, bitcoins were worthless and blocks were easy to generate with a CPU.  Anyone could build huge blocks for no cost.  The blocksize limit was added as an antispam measure since it was basically free to spam.

Today, if you want to build a big block, you risk that the rest of the network will reject it.  If that happens, your block is orphaned and you lose the block reward (subsidy + fees).  In order to spam a large block, you have to take the risk that your block will be orphaned, costing you about $11,250 (12.5 btc/block * $900 / btc).  Not to mention, that larger blocks take longer to propagate than smaller blocks, so in a race condition, the smaller block will always win and the larger block will be orphaned.

Even at the time the blocksize was introduced, Satoshi himself intended for it to be increased at a later date (via a hard fork):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1347.msg15366#msg15366
Quote
It can be phased in, like:

if (blocknumber > 115000)
    maxblocksize = largerlimit

It can start being in versions way ahead, so by the time it reaches that block number and goes into effect, the older versions that don't have it are already obsolete.

When we're near the cutoff block number, I can put an alert to old versions to make sure they know they have to upgrade.



599. Post 17669465 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 30, 2017, 06:45:58 AM
It is just another orphaned block.

You are wrong here, either intentionally or ignorant of the situation.

It is orphaned because it violates the rules of the majority of the network instead of because of a race condition, but the consequences are the same.  Namely, the miner loses out on the subsidy + fees and any transactions not already included in a block are put back in the mempool. Nobody gets hurt except the miner who found the block.



600. Post 17669581 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 30, 2017, 06:56:53 AM
Oh gawd ... when did this place become infested with the BU idiots again?!! FFS.

It's a walking disaster, a true shit show in terms of network systems thinking and an even worse fuck-up in terms of software implementation.

When will you guys grow a brain and at some point and leave that fucking huge shillfest mess behind already?!

If you want a cleaner implementation, bitcoin classic also supports a flag for specifying block size.  As for the "shit show" comment, can you explain why letting miners determine blocksize is a problem?  If it is a problem, we'd better hope they aren't able to get their hands on gcc or we are all screwed.



601. Post 17669601 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 30, 2017, 07:02:43 AM
It is just another orphaned block.

You are wrong here, either intentionally or ignorant of the situation.
Namely, the miner loses out on the subsidy + fees and any transactions not already included in a block are put back in the mempool. Nobody gets hurt except the miner who found the block.

No wrong and wrong again ... any miner who runs BU >1MByte is wasting electricity and resources on every hash they do ... they are buying tickets for a lottery that doesn't exist.


I agree.  BU miners should keep their produced blocks below 1MB for now.  A larger setting is dumb, but it won't hurt anyone but themselves.

Quote

BU is a radioactive mess, anyone who touches it is getting burned and sick. In a way they deserve it, but assholes like you who shill for BU deserve a special place in BU's hell of its own making. You should set up a BU mining farm, to show us all how dedicated to the cause you are ... pit all your money, time and resources into the biggest losing proposition in bitcoin, do it!

I think I'll pass on setting up a mining pool with retarded parameters.  I'll say a prayer for you.  You obviously have a lot of hate in your heart.



602. Post 17669658 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 30, 2017, 07:18:17 AM
I think I'll pass on setting up a mining pool with retarded parameters.  I'll say a prayer for you.  You obviously have a lot of hate in your heart.

Ok, a passive-aggressive pussy who lacks the courage of their convictions.

You should just paste that in your signature so next time I'll know not to bother logging on ...

Open up your hate and let it flow into me.



603. Post 17678226 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: Hunyadi on January 30, 2017, 12:32:11 PM
Someone took a risk and set their blocksize larger than 1mb.  It was a foolish thing to do with the current state of the blocksize debate, but it only hurt the miner who chose that setting.

Isn't it the case that this was a *bug* in BU code, rather than the pool operator going gung-ho with larger block sizes?

AFAIK it was a bug. No need to sugar coat it.

I wasn't aware at the time, but you are correct.  However, the bug did not harm anyone except the miner who chose to run BU.  There is already a fix under review, and existing clients can work around it by reducing their configured blocksize by the size of the coinbase transaction.  The bug was that the coinbase transaction wasn't included in the blocksize calculation when producing blocks.  Blocksize was counted correctly when verifying blocks, so no other BU miners would have built on the block unless their blocksize exceeded 1000000 bytes.

This incident shows us two things:
1. BU needs more testing and better code review processes.
2. The consensus mechanism works as it should and punished the miner who attempted (unintentionally) to make a larger block without agreement from the majority of the network.



604. Post 17689595 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Quote from: jbreher on January 31, 2017, 06:32:55 PM
... Bitcoin Unlimited [users] got destroyed yesterday with that huge mistake and BU...

Well, no. But thanks for playing. We've got a lovely consolation prize for you on your way out.

One BU miner lost out on the gains they would have made, due to their otherwise solved block being orphaned. Absolutely nobody else experienced any untoward effects. As for me, my BU node remains chugging away, happily, as always.

BU just passed 20% of hash rate.



605. Post 17702984 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on February 02, 2017, 04:17:40 AM
Patrick Byrne on FOX tv, this guy is one of those awesome Bitcoin frontrunners  Smiley

Overstock +16%, good job Patrick!




#myteam  Cool  ~Wall Street Wants In!!!

Make Bitcoin Great Again on his red cap, isnt that a cool move from Patrick?
straight up gangster!

he strikes me as just plain awesome.
just found the interview on youtube.
yup he's the man.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsZ23MNg58g



606. Post 17713095 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: hd060053 on February 02, 2017, 09:31:25 PM
jfi there are still > 22k BTC shorts on bitfinex. that can escalate quickly. next week is critical  Wink

Short positions on bitfinex haven't exceeded 16k since the hack.  The current figure is about 13k.  I'm not sure where you are getting 22k from.

https://bfxdata.com/positions/btcusd



607. Post 17713394 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Pruden on February 02, 2017, 11:24:47 PM
jfi there are still > 22k BTC shorts on bitfinex. that can escalate quickly. next week is critical  Wink

Short positions on bitfinex haven't exceeded 16k since the hack.  The current figure is about 13k.  I'm not sure where you are getting 22k from.

https://bfxdata.com/positions/btcusd
From here: https://bfxdata.com/swaphistory/totals

I wonder what the difference means.

You can reserve swaps without utilizing them, which can get you a better rate.  So there are 22k btc reserved, and 13k already sold, leaving 9k btc sitting there ready to be sold for the right price without any additional swap cost to the trader.

(this is wrong, see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg17714512#msg17714512)



608. Post 17714512 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: keyboard warrior on February 03, 2017, 12:25:10 AM
Does this link show historical BTC swaps used together with the unused swaps, omitting the USD swaps?

https://www.bfxdata.com/swaphistory/btc

The bottom chart on that page shows this.

total sum of BTC margin funding: 22,414

unused sum of BTC margin funding: 199


The top chart on this page shows these values.

https://bfxdata.com/positions/btcusd

BTCUSD long positions: 34 425

BTCUSD short positions: -13 267


I assume the different totals are because USD is included and those figures are active values.

I always thought the difference was because BTC margin was used for long position in the other markets as well as for shorts in BTC.

I have never used swaps on bitfinex. Can USD margin be used for long position in the other markets as well as for shorts in BTC? I think I read you can borrow bitcoins and use them to go either long or short with, and I assume USD is similar.

Yeah, my previous statement was wrong.  The 199 is the bitcoins reserved but not used.  The rest is BTC borrowed to short BTC against other currencies besides USD.  USD swaps can only be used to buy a different currency (aka sell USD).  BTC swaps can only be used to sell BTC (aka buy some other currency).  Margin is the balance you hold in your account that determines (along with your leverage level) how much you are allowed to borrow.  So there are nearly 22k in shorts, but only 13k shorting against USD.  9k are shorting BTC against other currencies.



609. Post 17734951 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

I've not met anyone who works in technology that didn't get it after reading the white paper (see sig if you haven't read it yet).  Most deniers simply haven't taken the time to learn what it is.  Unfortunately, the white paper is no longer front and center when you google bitcoin.



610. Post 17765429 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: 600watt on February 07, 2017, 07:30:22 AM
chinese volume last 24 hrs seems bigger than $ volume. wasn't it smaller in the last week or so?

https://bitcoinwisdom.com


Last week was lunar new year so the Chinese where mostly on vacation.



611. Post 17774083 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 08, 2017, 05:15:22 AM
A bitcoin ETF would be for the bitcoin 'market cap' like an IPO for big. tech. stock ....

Opens way too high, crashes immediately, then slowly recovers to 4X the IPO price?



612. Post 17843047 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: Aviator019 on February 14, 2017, 12:02:11 AM
Okay so I'm quite convinced that the trend is gonna be bullish... but at the same time I'm expecting more dumps bottoming out a bit lower than the last one (around 960-970)... what are you guys expecting

Price will move to the right.  Some up, some down, but mostly right.



613. Post 17888938 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: jbreher on February 18, 2017, 12:19:25 AM
- In the meantime, Bitcoin -- at 1MB blocks -- is hard-capped at ~250,000 transactions per day. Period. The consequences of this could rationally be argued to be constraining new entrants into the system. (Indeed, I would say it is obvious that it does, but grant that others may have a differing opinion.) The pool of node operators is a self-selected subset of Bitcoiners. If we prevent new Bitcoiners from entering the system, the potential population from which node operators are selected cannot grow. Many of us think it likely that some percentage of new entrants will start up nodes. So increasing block size may actually result in more operational full nodes.

This is a key point.  More people being able to use the bitcoin network will be a decentralizing force.  Really, the debate is about which force is stronger... nodes dropping out from extra bandwidth or new nodes because of new users.  If the percentage of users running a full node drops from 5% to 2.5%, but we double our user base, we have the same level of decentralization.  Since increase in bandwidth and storage are generally better than linear, I would expect that increasing usage and thus resource requirements would result in a sublinear increase in node operations costs.  If you can have X bandwidth for $Y, you can probably have 10X bandwidth for $2Y.

You might argue that increasing blocksize will result in more transactions of less value, but changing blocksize has 0 influence on the miners' cost to include the transaction in a block.  There is always a cost due to orphan risk, long term storage, and UTXO bloat.  Blocksize doesn't change any of that.



614. Post 17926132 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.03h):

Quote from: ImI on February 21, 2017, 12:48:18 PM
what's currently the "official" ATH?

1163$

no one cares about the fake ATH that gox did

The media does.  They won't run a story about breaking the all time high until they can do it without having to explain why the MtGox price is invalid.



615. Post 17945045 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin/

1.2 Million BTC in motion, $1.35 billion worth.
112k transactions
64.5MB, will take 10.75 hours to clear assuming now new transactions (good luck with that)

The market could easily overheat here if people can't move their coins to the exchanges to cool it off.



616. Post 17949356 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on February 23, 2017, 12:50:51 PM
https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin/

1.2 Million BTC in motion, $1.35 billion worth.
112k transactions
64.5MB, will take 10.75 hours to clear assuming now new transactions (good luck with that)

The market could easily overheat here if people can't move their coins to the exchanges to cool it off.

But transactions per second is at 4, which is within BTC's ability. I see the 60mb figure, but how are they conflicting? (Yeah, I don't get this)
Thanks in advance for an explanation.

BTW - Kind of funny that bitcoins limitations can slow a move down...

Its about sharing

7tps is with minimum size transactions.  In practice the average transaction is much larger.  Also, the rate has exceeded 4tps for periods in the past couple days.



617. Post 17956762 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Torque on February 24, 2017, 01:05:45 AM
their buy in was at the $10 mark mainly i think. they've been at it for five years now and arrived long before many people here. they definitely ain't johnny come latelys.

If they bought $11M worth of bitcoin around $10/btc, then they would have a million bitcoin.  

Impossible, no way in hell that they have 1 million bitcoin worth over $1T.

Unless I'm confused and they had $11M worth of bitcoin in 2013 at $120/btc?? That would mean that they only invested like $1.1M in 2012 at $10/btc, giving them ~100K bitcoin.

1 million would be $1 billion, not $1 trillion.

However, I believe that the number the claimed is 210,000 or 1% of the supply limit.

Edited based on this: https://usahitman.com/wtcto1poab/



618. Post 17957443 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on February 24, 2017, 02:48:29 AM
and i'm in the red something like 4 BTC... ARGH.

How in the fuck does that happen ?!

Shorters  Roll Eyes



619. Post 17958060 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Dafar on February 24, 2017, 04:49:19 AM
Guys.. I'm drunk, and I just bought some more....I never bought this high before, not even close. I think I made a big mistake, but fuck it!





you'll do just fine



620. Post 18032110 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: xanderbelly on March 02, 2017, 03:28:15 AM
I saw that wall. It's kind of ridiculous. Don't multi-millionaires have more fun things to do than flash monster-sized bitcoin walls?

That wasn't a wall of bitcoins. It was a wall of USD.

Saw the same thing yesterday. An offer to buy 1000 coins appears out of the blue and vanishes seconds later.

Same person or group?

These are possibly Virtu, Convergex, and KCG (COIN ETF Authorized Participants) testing out their buying process prior to launch. The ETF only accepts "Baskets" of 1,000 BTC minimum in exchange for COIN shares to sell.

I think it is 1,000 shares, and with 0.01 btc/share, it is 10 btc.  If the minimum trade was over $1 million worth of btc, the price would not track very closely.



621. Post 18076863 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: BitChick on March 05, 2017, 05:41:21 PM
is there any way we can user activate women out of cryptocurrency?  that would be nice lol

I have found if you just talk computers or bitcoin in general to women they run away. So I don't think we have to worry about that
in our geek/lame world here on bitcointalk. (or in real life for that manner)

hmmm..that may have been a bit too harsh for this group....

on the other hand I have heard that if BTC gets to be around 10k a BTC and you have 100 BTC you suddenly without rime nor reason

become very attractive...its a mystery?

go figure?



Some women are more devoted to BTC than the men around here. Wink



They would have to be to stick around in the face of the infantile ignorance shown towards their gender.



622. Post 18080923 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on March 06, 2017, 12:56:58 AM
Bloomburg has ETF listed:  Pematurely I might add but listed:  https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/COIN:US

That page literally says "Unlisted" right below "COIN".  The COIN symbol has been reserved for years.  This is not an indicator of anything.



623. Post 18093629 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 07, 2017, 01:50:46 AM
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/5xtgjc/megathread_etf_part2/delkwcp/

Fake ETF denial sparks insta panic. There's a wee taster if it's a genuine no.

What panic? No sudden moves showing on coinmarketcap.

Somebody's watching the 5 minute chart and hasn't realized that the $5 range today makes tiny moves look huge.



624. Post 18099124 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: becoin on March 07, 2017, 01:22:27 PM
text

The blocksize will obviously need to be larger or the fees will become too big. Why is that hard to understand tho?

The fees need to become too big to accelerate development of long term scaling solutions like LN. Why is that hard to understand tho?

Show me a solution to the decentralized routing problem that prevents LN from devolving into a hub and spoke model that just creates a new banker class (or is bought up by the existing one).



625. Post 18104044 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: jbreher on March 07, 2017, 10:18:45 PM
BU is garbage, only a fucking idiot thinks it's a good idea.

I think BU is a good idea. I realize you don't know me from adam, but I assure you, I am not a fucking idiot. Certainly the evidence of my position in life disproves the assertion.

Mr. "I'm gonna defraud a million bucks from daddy under false pretenses" (bystanders might ask Dafar what I refer to here)

I note you make no argument -- only sling shit -- in your screed.

Oh look - new material edited. OK - amongst the ad-homs you do say one thing at least defensible:

BU may never achieve critical mass. As neither has done Classic or others...

...As neither has done The SegWit Omnibus Changeset.

It is hilarious how much panic a few BU blocks can cause.  Even if BU becomes the majority, it won't fork until a large size is coordinated with all the relevant actors.  Nobody in their right mind would mine a block bigger than 1MB before everyone is ready.  If they do, fuck 'em.  But all the smallblockists are shitting themselves over nothing.  BU doesn't solve the block size debate or remove the block size limit.  It just enables decisions to be made by people who aren't developers.  If you want your decentralized money system to have price controls, I'm not sure why you chose to support bitcoin.



626. Post 18106782 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: B1tUnl0ck3r on March 08, 2017, 05:07:43 AM
according to the graphic above EC has ~40%  and EC+8MB has ~60%

wow, i didnt realize we are so DOOOOOOMED!

last chance to sell V1 coins.

I don't understand your constant whining guys. What's the problems with the fees and the limiting number of txs per day? If you want to get in the block pay more. it's so easy.

yes bitcoin isn't your free coins that you can get anything for free with it. It's not like what you are used to. if you want to get in a block pay the fees, as such you support the miners and the networks. if you find it too expensive why aren't you mining?

that's right because it's not free. you want a free miner, with free electricity...

I hope that some of you will reconsider their positions.

with bitcoin you can store and move value very efficiently and cheaply and safely against all regulations or actors.

The limit should be determined by miners.  Bitcoin core developers controlling block size is just another form of price fixing/rationing.  We all should know how well that works out by now.



627. Post 18106964 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: B1tUnl0ck3r on March 08, 2017, 05:28:41 AM
according to the graphic above EC has ~40%  and EC+8MB has ~60%

wow, i didnt realize we are so DOOOOOOMED!

last chance to sell V1 coins.

I don't understand your constant whining guys. What's the problems with the fees and the limiting number of txs per day? If you want to get in the block pay more. it's so easy.

yes bitcoin isn't your free coins that you can get anything for free with it. It's not like what you are used to. if you want to get in a block pay the fees, as such you support the miners and the networks. if you find it too expensive why aren't you mining?

that's right because it's not free. you want a free miner, with free electricity...

I hope that some of you will reconsider their positions.

with bitcoin you can store and move value very efficiently and cheaply and safely against all regulations or actors.

The limit should be determined by miners.  Bitcoin core developers controlling block size is just another form of price fixing/rationing.  We all should know how well that works out by now.

the last block happened ~30 mins ago and  ~5mbs (3100) of new txs are waiting (on top of the queue from before the last block).

there is 1 big question: should bitcoin be the one coin to bind them all, meaning forks and others side chains are seen as uncomplimentary.

in the one coin optic 8mb, 80mb or 80 Gbs will never be enough... but in my opinion it's unsafe and not very resilient. I prefer to keep the original network at 1mb (and why 8mbs? to please the "chineses", why not directly 10mb?).


Forks and side chains will play a role, but if bitcoin doesn't allow the people with the most information about what the network can handle (the miners) to optimize block size, some other coin will.  Then bitcoin won't have a role at all except as a historical curiosity.

Emergent consensus is not elimination of block size restriction.  Miners will always restrict size because there is a cost to increasing it.



628. Post 18107032 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: HanvanBitcoin on March 08, 2017, 05:54:28 AM
Just bought the dip  Cool

This guy gets it.



629. Post 18107114 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: PoolMinor on March 08, 2017, 06:01:17 AM
Actually, pools control the blocksize.
minners are free to pick the pool they mine at.
Exactly, but who has the control over block size other than the pool operator. P2Pool?

the network as a whole?

nothing really changes, bitcoin is not free of its limits only more able to coordinate its limits without being less hindered by politics.

I would hope that if EC is to be successful, it's with >90%. and I Really hope all the small blocks stay, and provide adequate pressure to make sure blocks grow at a respectable comfortable rate.
 

Democracy is about compromise, SegWit was Core's compromise. It was up to the pool operators to accept the compromise. Please broaden your outlook, it is easier to point fingers than do critical thinking.

If SegWit was the compromise, what was the original position?  Besides, according the the hong kong agreement, the compromise was segwit + a can kick blocksize increase.  The latter part never materialized.  You can't "compromise", and then abandon the concessions you've made to achieve that agreement.



630. Post 18107165 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on March 08, 2017, 06:08:55 AM
Quote
Emergent consensus is not elimination of block size restriction.  Miners will always restrict size because there is a cost to increasing it.

When BU forms a chain, it will take one, and only one, 'valid' malicious block to ruin that chain forever.  Any BUcoin will exist forever with that Sword of Damocles hanging over it. On that one fatal security flaw alone it is not a serious contender for solving capacity expansion for bitcoin.


WTF are you talking about?  Can you please go into detail about how a single malicious block can cause any harm to anyone other than the miner who produced it?



631. Post 18107396 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 08, 2017, 06:24:33 AM
I came here because I was interested to read the stories of many of you fellas in respect to bitcoin price analysis and predictions.

Instead, I see lot's of BU nonsense.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Tongue


We see a dip yesterday from nearly upper $1200s to mid $1100s and then a return to mid $1200s.. and now a drop to upper $1100s.  This all seems to be related to uncertainty either way regarding the direction of any possible ETF announcement, and folks seem to be kinda raring to go, no?

Of course, some have pre-emptively struck in one direction or another with their belief about what the outcome is going to be.

lol ya, Me too, seems that when price drops, we all come here, some poeple post a link or 2 explaining why price is acting the way it is ( the ETF thing coming soon) and then we proceed to discuss the all the other forking shit.  




Antpool mined a few BU blocks and this subforum went nuts with threads about an imminent fork Roll Eyes.  Naturally, this thread got caught up in it.



632. Post 18123654 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: julian071 on March 09, 2017, 02:19:59 PM
Anyone else refreshing btctalk all day?

Refresh this instead: https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/batsbzx.htm



633. Post 18129657 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: bones261 on March 10, 2017, 01:17:31 AM
This may be a stupid question, but how exactly is the SEC going to announce the decision? Are they going to publish something online or will the king of SEC step out on a balcony of the SEC HQ and proclaim the decision to a raging crowd in front of the building or how else will they do this?

The appropriate official will spurt a 'Y' or 'N' with their semen across a stripper's breasts. Those guys know how to deliver a message that hits hard.


Baaaahhahahahahaha

I guess the first time I posted this it got removed for not being about walls or price movement? So, I'm using the wall @1207.10 as a safety net to do small trades, anyone else ever do this?

Hopefully some people will see the arbitration opportunity at coinbase and dump the price down to what it is on the other exchanges.

Unless the gap has already closed, I don't see enough of a gap to mess with.  It is currently less than 0.5%, which barely covers fees.



634. Post 18139978 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Denied

https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/batsbzx/2017/34-80206.pdf



635. Post 18159089 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on March 12, 2017, 02:58:28 PM
No reason for bitcoin to rise? LOL
Do people really hang out on these forums and still not get it?

Go read the bitcoin whitepaper, think about future implications of this technological advancement. Look up the increasing bitcoin demand that is happening on a global scale already.

Yep, definitely no reason for a price increase...

Yep.  The whitepaper is in my sig for those interested.



636. Post 18159273 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Killerpotleaf on March 12, 2017, 01:03:55 AM
Feels like a big disconnect between trader's "sentiment" and the external market here to me.

I think traders got overly focused (obsessed even) with the wtf ETF because it was 'their thing', Wall St., big bucks, yada yada yada, etc BS. So price has been dominated by trader's sentiment towards ETF thinking since at least mid December .... meanwhile the physical market on the street in India, Japan, China, Asia, Brazil, S. America, UK Europe, USA, etc has been picking up some serious exponential growth steam, look at wallet adoption numbers, s/ware downloads, localbitcoins.com.

Just saying you guys might be missing the woods for the trees. Try not to get run over by the bitcoin moon train when scalping your trading card pennies up off the track ...


the question now is, can the market support these prices without this "ETF coming SoonTM" bullishness.

i'm betting that it can't, and we in for a sizeable drop, probably Below 1000$.. i'm looking forward to a more reasonable 950

Well the worst is likely over, the big selloff was the bulk of it but there might be smaller dips later here and there. I'm betting we'll drop right back down again to 1000 once we poke around 1250 if we even get there or even lower.

the sell off was the bets being placed. now we wait and see if the bets are winners.

I'm sorry to tell you this, but the smart bets were placed before the announcement.  The sell off was the longs taking their losses via stop-loss orders/margin calls.  The shorts took profit during this time via limit orders.  If you weren't proactive, it happened to fast to be reactive.  Being reactive rarely works out.

Leveraged shorts have built up quite a bit and leveraged longs have been coming down as the limit order dip buyers take profits.  On top of that, everyone who was waiting for a dip and didn't have an order in place is waiting to buy.  The ETF was keeping people from committing because they thought they could get in cheaper.  If it was positive, they assumed they could buy in higher, but it wouldn't matter.  Waiting for another dip probably won't work out very well.



637. Post 18159296 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: mckk on March 12, 2017, 03:11:58 PM
Ok, Maybe I wasn't too precise - IMHO It's going to rise in long-term. But in a short term I think there will be correction - pre-ETF hype took price to 1290$ level, ETF happened causing drop and now what? Why are we going up so fast? Price should oscillate around 1000$ imo.

See my reply to killerpotleaf a couple posts up.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg18159273#msg18159273



638. Post 18159527 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: becoin on March 12, 2017, 03:34:29 PM
No reason for bitcoin to rise? LOL
Do people really hang out on these forums and still not get it?

Go read the bitcoin whitepaper, think about future implications of this technological advancement. Look up the increasing bitcoin demand that is happening on a global scale already.

Yep, definitely no reason for a price increase...

Exactly. Those who don't bother to really learn, research or understand things very deeply, if at all = low information sheeple, err I meant people. Low information people  Wink
Man I was talking about short term, I repeat SHORT.

Don't panic! If you can't buy now you'll have chance to buy at 1300 on Monday.

The Japanese are already paying $1300.



639. Post 18159564 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: mckk on March 12, 2017, 03:38:39 PM
No reason for bitcoin to rise? LOL
Do people really hang out on these forums and still not get it?

Go read the bitcoin whitepaper, think about future implications of this technological advancement. Look up the increasing bitcoin demand that is happening on a global scale already.

Yep, definitely no reason for a price increase...

Exactly. Those who don't bother to really learn, research or understand things very deeply, if at all = low information sheeple, err I meant people. Low information people  Wink
Man I was talking about short term, I repeat SHORT.

Don't panic! If you can't buy now you'll have chance to buy at 1300 on Monday.
All of you (or most of you) are really trusting that we will see blind green candle. Okay, I don't think so. When everyone is saying that BTC will rise (I'm talking about short term) everyone is buying, but that's just blind move imo. Big Bears want to pump price to get better profits on their shorts. Sooner or later we will see drop.

Why?  What evidence do you have that it will drop?  Lots of people seem to be expecting that, but I just can't understand what would cause that to happen.  Leveraged longs are low, leveraged shorts are high.  Demand has been pent up awaiting the decision.  Anyone who wanted to sell has sold.



640. Post 18192415 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Paashaas on March 14, 2017, 07:51:45 PM


In other news...



https://coin.dance/blocks/unlimitedhistorical



641. Post 18229969 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Holliday on March 17, 2017, 11:40:26 PM
Miners will include everything that contains a transaction fee, even one satoshi. Why? Because even one satoshi is one satoshi. And then came spam...................

One could add 100GB to the BU blockchain, just by spending 1 BU coin.

This is not a reasonable game theory interpretation of what will happen. They will set the block size to yield the highest total fees, which would require the exclusion of very low fee transactions.

So, we've had tons of "spam" on the network, I assume that "spam" will continue post BU (should that happen). I also imagine lots of new "spam" as an attack on BU.

Miners craft blocks to get the highest total fees, means they are accepting blocks of that size? What happens when a malicious miner crafts blocks of the same size but filled with their own transactions, thus not draining the mempool what-so-ever?

I'm not convinced that incentives will simply be mine-blocks-for-rewards if there is a fork. I think we will see all kinds of attacks on both networks (after this long of a stalemate and the bitterness we are seeing today, it would be naive to think otherwise) and I'm interested to see how BU with it's multiple variables (additional complexity) deals with such attacks. I fully expect them to eat themselves before long and hard code rules to prevent certain things from happening, basically ending up even more restrictive than a simple you-get-what-you-pay-for fee market.

we welcome fee paying spam.  Cheesy

if you guys want to create valid blocks on our network thats cool man

even if you want to do some tests and see if invalid blocks get rejected thats OK too

If you are accepting blocks of N size with fee paying transactions, you will also accept my blocks of N size consisting entirely of 0 fee transactions to myself that I've not broadcast but simply put in my blocks. My blocks are valid according to your rules, bloat the chain, do not help reduce the mempool, and still receive block rewards!

And because your block had unbroadcast transactions it would take longer to validate than a different block released at about the same time.  Because BU has parallel validation of competing chains, your block would lose out even it arrived slightly quicker.  It is this orphan risk that creates the cost.



642. Post 18230183 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Holliday on March 17, 2017, 11:50:06 PM
Fine, I'll just broadcast all those 0 fee transactions first. I wasn't thinking when I suggested keeping them to myself. They are 0 fee, I have nothing to lose!

And remember, I'm here to get paid block rewards to attack the chain. Even if I lose out on some close blocks, so what?

Miners are free to prioritize however they'd like.  I can't imagine you'd get more than a couple blocks accepted before they implemented countermeasures.

Nodes are also free do decide what to forward.  Unless your 0 fee transactions have sizeable outputs, they would already be dropped by today's network.  How many btc are you willing to devote to this pointless attack?



643. Post 18230192 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

In the hopes we can start an actual dialog and quit throwing insults at each other:

Quote from: notme on March 17, 2017, 11:59:22 PM
BU does not want a contentious fork.  It is just a tool to allow larger blocks without requiring the blessing of self-appointed bitcoin priests.  Miners will only utilize the tool when the market is ready to have larger blocks.  They are not dumb enough to shoot themselves in the foot.  There is no magic threshold that will trigger a hard fork.

If you actually want to understand BU and not just parrot the unfounded attacks on it, check out the BU subfourm on the forum where the idea was hatched back in 2015: https://bitco.in/forum/forums/bitcoin-unlimited.15/

Start threads, ask questions, find out what BU actually is.  If you are right that is is bad, you'll be able to attack it much better once you understand it.



644. Post 18230378 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Holliday on March 18, 2017, 12:32:06 AM
Fine, I'll just broadcast all those 0 fee transactions first. I wasn't thinking when I suggested keeping them to myself. They are 0 fee, I have nothing to lose!

And remember, I'm here to get paid block rewards to attack the chain. Even if I lose out on some close blocks, so what?

Miners are free to prioritize however they'd like.  I can't imagine you'd get more than a couple blocks accepted before they implemented countermeasures.

Nodes are also free do decide what to forward.  Unless your 0 fee transactions have sizeable outputs, they would already be dropped by today's network.  How many btc are you willing to devote to this pointless attack?

I'm not sure how broadcasting 0 fee transactions that send bitcoins to myself costs me anything. As I said, I would be paid block rewards. I don't know that the attack is considered pointless if I'm adding bloat to the chain without contributing anything.

The "implemented countermeasures" is what I'm interested in. I mean, how does one tell my transactions from a regular user? Or my blocks, for that matter? As I said, I fully expect BU to eat itself in short time and be more restrictive than a simple you-get-what-you-pay-for fee market.

If they reject blocks that are more than 5% free transactions, you would lose your block rewards or have to limit your bloat to 5% of the block.  They could alternatively do it using some measure such as (delta utxo)/(tx fees) >= some minimum.  If you aren't bloating the UTXO, you're actually helping since miners can easily prune transactions with no unspent outputs.



645. Post 18230622 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: becoin on March 18, 2017, 12:44:30 AM
In the hopes we can start an actual dialog and quit throwing insults at each other:

C'mon! Stop talking BS and fork it!
If you don't, just STFU!

I guess you missed the part about BU doesn't want a contentious fork.  I would be very happy if we could all STFU about BU, but people keep saying that BU wants to fork without consensus, which is an utter lie.



646. Post 18230712 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: bitserve on March 18, 2017, 01:31:35 AM
In the hopes we can start an actual dialog and quit throwing insults at each other:

C'mon! Stop talking BS and fork it!
If you don't, just STFU!

I guess you missed the part about BU doesn't want a contentious fork.  I would be very happy if we could all STFU about BU, but people keep saying that BU wants to fork without consensus, which is an utter lie.

BU doesn't want to fork without consensus? Great, everything is ok then.... except that's not what many BU supporters are saying.

Also... when we talk about consensus? Are we talking about 95% consensus or which percentage? <- This is the most fundamental point.

Which BU supporters?  Can you provide any links?  I've only seen this claim from people who are running around screaming about BU being evil, which makes since if they actually believe that BU actually wants to fracture bitcoin.



647. Post 18255584 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: satoshi on July 29, 2010, 02:00:38 AM
The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale.  That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server.  The design supports letting users just be users.  The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be.  Those few nodes will be big server farms.  The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate.



648. Post 18255803 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Holliday on March 19, 2017, 10:22:24 PM
Quote from: satoshi - bitcoin.pdf
What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third  party.

If I have to rely on another person to provide me with the block chain data, that is clearly the need for a trusted third party.

If you run an SPV node that connects broadly to the network, only have to rely on the network being honest, not a particular node operator.  SPV nodes are even described in the whitepaper (one click away in my sig).



649. Post 18296060 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Torque on March 22, 2017, 09:23:44 PM
blah blah blah more fork FUD bullshit blah blah

Thanks for id'ing yourself, my ignore list just keeps getting longer

Just keep pushing the ignore button.  Soon everyone will agree with you.



650. Post 18327870 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Lauda on March 25, 2017, 08:38:32 AM
-snip-
This is why I say I hope you people bought some physical, tangible items with your moon priced bitcoins, because everything about digital currency trading and price is so heinously fraudulent (as can be seen by 0.1 btc priced darkcoins), that it's all going to come collapsing down in a big way someday.  It's obviously not a store of value when nobody is even putting anything of value on the line in a lot of cases in the first place...leveraging illiquid assets...
Enough of your nonsense metals propaganda. The market of metals is one of the corruptest and overpriced markets out there. Neither gold nor silver are worth anywhere near what they're priced at right now (don't make me go into diamonds and other crap).

Did you even read the BIP before asking questions? Angry This does not really need miners, especially not 95% as the BIP9 activation does. It sets a flag day. When this day is reached, anyone running this BIP (Bitfury is already testing it) is producing Segwit blocks and this is compatible with all >0.13.1 nodes.

What sort of timescale are you suggesting for this?
It is already defined in the BIP. October 2017. Anyone who has a client supporting Segwit already does not have to do anything.

It takes two to tango, doesn't it?
There is no tango here.

To the degree people are choosing alts over BTC, Ver & Jihan can hardly be held accountable. Core has dropped the ball. Can they pick it up? That would require a schism (another one) in Core. UASF is almost as divisive as BU. And without leadership...
This is bullshit. Nobody in their right fucking mind would attempt to use one of these scam coins. The only reason that people go in those is to gather more Bitcoin. That said, both Ver & Jihan are directly responsible for this, with their power-grab attempt. Core has done nothing wrong. They provided a very good (Segwit isn't perfect) scaling solution that would provide ~2.1 MB worth of TXs with adoption. In addition to that, they'd implement Schnorr post Segwit which would give the network even more capacity without requiring a HF.

-snip-
argh..just pump to 2k already and I'd not be worrying about frigging 2.25k of btc in my attic in $$$ towards ebay Sad
My understanding is that, some price decline post ETF denial was to be expected and healthy. However, this is starting to become too much. People are *scared*, and this is directly due to the threats from Jihan to fork BTC into BTC & BTU (altcoin). If there was never a BTU, and Segwit activated in late December or early Q1 2017, we could have probably been at $2000 already (at least for a moment).

Anybody else remember when we tried to have rational discussions on these topics since over a year ago?  Too bad certain moderators kept deleting our conversations.  Without discussion, opinions polarized and now the situation has boiled over.

If you are mad Lauda, look in the mirror.



651. Post 18373366 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Holliday on March 29, 2017, 03:48:53 AM
Wall observed! Bitstamp. Being eaten as I type. Somewhere around 650 coins. Not too shabby.


363 left



652. Post 18373449 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Wall... what wall?

I don't see any walls Wink.



653. Post 18386010 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 29, 2017, 07:18:35 PM
Good morning Bitcoinland.

Still going pretty much sideways with just the slightest upward creep... currently $1045USD (Bitcoinaverage).

We're working on our 5th consecutive green daily candle (Stamp) but it's ever so short.

At least the panicking has subsided for now but it might keep going sideways for a while longer until the altcoin fad runs its course and the money flows back into Bitcoin.

Yeah.. I had been watching the daily candles pretty closely too in order to get a sense of our recovery from the correction to $900, but still pretty early to call today's candle, since there are still 8 more hours before it closes.

At this time, you are correct that the bitstamp candle is hovering around the turning point which is about $1043  and today's candle has to close above $1043 to be green.  In that regard, we had 2 out of the previous 4 candles as nail biters and 2 out of the 4 as clearly and unambigously green.

Even though we seem to be experiencing a decent amount of ongoing buying pressure at these prices, I would not be surprised either way about the direction of the closing of today's candle.

price now is 1021.08 on Bitstamp with no sign of a recovery for today. Looks like today will be the first daily candle clearly negative.

Wonder if this is a trend reversal or means more sideways Huh

Careful about calling the candle too soon.

Look we have nearly 5 hours yet, and there is quite a bit of ongoing volume, so I wouldn't write off the bulls too soon in this daily candle battle.

And, being within 2-3% of the turning point of the candle can be achieved in a matter of 30 minutes, and sometimes less time is needed to accomplish such pumps (or dumps).

https://youtu.be/sHDFN5kBN4o?t=173



654. Post 19078623 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: toknormal on May 18, 2017, 11:29:07 AM

Secondly, it doesn't matter what you make the blocksize - 2 Mb, 16 Mb 32 Mb. It will still get full and still be spammable.


You keep saying this, but consider that if you double the available space without halving the minimum fee then you double the cost of DOSing legitimate transactions.  If blocks are full, there will be fee pressure that ensures this floor (besides the fact that transactions without sufficient fees aren't even relayed anymore).  If blocks aren't full, then miners are perfectly capable of determining what transactions are worth the long term cost to include.  They are the ones who have to bear that cost after all.



655. Post 19183666 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: bitjanja on May 24, 2017, 11:23:52 PM
please somebody tell the KRAKEN trigger happy users to put a pencil in ear until it bleeds and stop dumping  Angry

Why not just buy their dumps?  If they are trigger happy it should work out well for you.



656. Post 19203853 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: megadeth on May 26, 2017, 04:26:14 AM
That looks like bitcoinity.org to me. The volume bars default to bitcoin (mBTC in fact) on bitcoinity.org and it appears that you haven't changed it. Here is the same BitStamp chart after changing volume to USD.

You're right.  Not sure why the default volume listed would be denominated in bitcoin when bitcoin is a derivative of the US dollar so the only thing useful for traders is the USD volume.  Anyways, on USD volume Bitfinex is down from halving while bitstamp is up.

Finex is a r0ach motel.

FTFY



657. Post 19265339 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: bitserve on May 29, 2017, 11:30:34 PM
Washing the truck is always rather suspicious.

I don't trust anyone who washes vehicles. I let the dirt build up and then it usually comes off like a complete second skin when I have my next car crash. My latest was with a sheep. I won.

I would feel really bad if I crashed into a sheep. The sheep would feel worse though.

A wet sheep with soap on it should do wonders if you hit it a few times...

Wet soap is a bad store of value.

Yeah, that's shit is a bubble.



658. Post 19265450 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Dafar on May 30, 2017, 12:39:54 AM
Sup fellas...


Are we bleeding down to $1500-$1700?

Or trying for $3000 again?



And what's gonna happen on August 1st? Anyone else a little worried about UASF vs Jihan??

UASF?  Do you mean the hard fork that has to be activated by a miner?



659. Post 19266196 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: Paashaas on May 30, 2017, 01:54:44 AM
UASF?  Do you mean the hard fork that has to be activated by a miner?

UASF stands for User Activated Soft Fork. It’s a mechanism where the activation time of a soft fork occurs on a specified date enforced by full nodes, a concept sometimes referred to as the economic majority.

We will be free from Jihan Wu on 1st August.

I know what it stands for and how it works.  It is not user activated and it is not a soft fork.



660. Post 19388010 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 06, 2017, 01:42:51 AM
$3OOO now all aboard the BTC moon train choo choo Cool #whale watching!!!

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vZV_oq9zOq0/maxresdefault.jpg




661. Post 19388443 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):




662. Post 20361037 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on July 24, 2017, 11:14:22 PM
No, no. No hard forks.

Yes, yes. Yes hard fork.   Lips sealed

fork To Da Moon!!!  Grin


Fork would never moon.

Look at history, look at ETC, it tells enough of this stupid tale.

ETC is the original ruleset.  ETH is the fork.



663. Post 20454086 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on July 28, 2017, 07:42:22 PM
Yes. In my math, $403 is exactly between 1% and 2% of $2759.

BTCC crooks don't have that much money to support such a price. Unless, of course, they succeed in stealing bitcoins from noobs as already explained.


they can pump chinese fiat renminbi into that freak all day long

I'd really like to ignore this as a non-event. But I can't because it isn't because somebody will pump that freak all day long.

@becoin
Greed always finds a way

That's what I'm saying. Greed will force noobs to split their wallets and try to sell the fork. Instead they'll end up selling their bitcoins for peanuts. That's the game of the crooks.

That might be the game of some of the crooks, but most of the names on that list have conviction and big bags. I think you underestimate this.


Here's a conspiracy theory for you guys:

What if the Chinese miners wait until you all finish dumping all your BCC (which they will be buying), then turn ALL their hashpower onto the BCC chain?

Then they will control Bitcoin, AND they will have ALL the BTC you have been hoarding all these years...


Just a thought Wink


Shhh... I want cheap bch.



664. Post 20460183 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: fabiorem on July 28, 2017, 10:09:32 PM
Actually I'm not going to even touch it.

I was worried about the market, if people start dumping BCC and it uses the same addresses as BTC, then BTC will de dumped altogether.

https://www.bitcoincash.org, click the FAQ link.

BCC (or BCH as most exchanges are calling it) will be an entirely separate blockchain, but it will share a history with BTC.  If you have BTC at the time of the fork, you will have the same number of BCH.  The private key for your BTC can be used to sign a BCH transaction.  However, the transaction format has been updated for BCH in a way that BCH transactions are not valid on the BTC chain and BTC transactions are not valid on the BCH chain.  There will be no replay attacks.  It will be impossible to screw up a split.  If you don't trust any BCH wallets, move your bitcoins before importing the private keys.  Selling one will not sell the other.



665. Post 20523808 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: YamashitaRen on July 31, 2017, 10:15:05 PM
I moved some BTC to Kraken to get BCC... Just tried trading now and holy fuck... it is slow as shit!
They must be running on an old pentium 1 laptop!!!   Angry Angry Angry

i also wanted to sell all the BCHbut is not listed yet...you see it???
BCC note available yet   I was selling some BTC

I think you mean BCH  ( http://blog.kraken.com/post/1150/bitcoin-cash-and-a-critical-alert-for-bitcoin-margin-traders/ )

EDIT: kraken works perfect...not slow for me
I dont believe you... it is slow as fuck.

you can believe whatever you want mate Smiley i not force you ...
again like i said before for me works great !

Would you be another API trader, by chance ?

As for me, I cashed out from Kraken to Bitfinex a few days ago. No regrets ! No more market orders so slow that I can cancel them.

Good luck with Bitfinex... you won't get your full allotment of BCH because they are using a "socialized distribution coefficient" which allows people who margin short BTC while holding actual BTC to steal a portion of your BCH.

https://www.bitfinex.com/posts/212/review



666. Post 20552159 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 02, 2017, 03:53:41 AM
this is the calm before the storm ... you can't say you haven't been warned.

When the hashpower begins swinging from one chain to another it's going to get very messy and both coins will become unpredictable, unstable and at times very difficult to use. One logical conclusion out of this is when Bcash adopts merged-mining ... or the hashpower wars will drag on until the bitcoin landscape becomes derelict and eventually a failed experiment.

Edit: Bcash adopting merged-mining is probably unlikely given the dominance of Bitmain h/ware on that chain that needs ASICboost to retain profitability and segwit header code conflicts with this type of miner cheating/shortcut.

Either chain adopting merged mining would be admitting defeat.  Merged mining implies you are deferring to the other chain as a source of truth/security.



667. Post 20552655 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 02, 2017, 04:38:59 AM
Merged mining implies you are deferring to the other chain as a source of truth/security.

... yeah, all you've done here is make clear that you don't understand merged-mining without furthering the debate in the slightest.

Then explain it to me, because your response adds nothing either.  Roll Eyes

I'm sorry you're in such a foul mood today.



668. Post 20552942 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Kraken's web interface is alive again... now that there are more than just bots trading the action is picking up in the bch markets.



669. Post 20613674 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: Torque on August 04, 2017, 12:26:18 PM
It's not BCash, it's Bitcoin Cash.

You big blockers can call your abortion fork coin whatever you want to call it.

We "Bitcoiners" will refer to it as BCash. Or shitcoin clone. Whichever.

Pride cometh before the fall.  I'm betting on both horses (by doing nothing), so I'm covered either way.  BTC is worth the same as before the fork, so why be greedy and dump BCH?  If you haven't dumped it, the only reason to bash it is because you're afraid of it.



670. Post 20614159 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: AlexGR on August 04, 2017, 01:01:29 PM
He was right, though.  The fact that BCH has fast difficulty adjustment and bitcoin doesn't while the Chinese control most of the hash power is gonna be mega-problems for BTC.

A fast difficulty adjustment works both ways. Say a lot of SHA256 power goes into bch...it rapes mining for a few tens of blocks with low diff and then miners switch back to Bitcoin, while bch hangs there, waiting for miners, but nobody is mining it due to high difficulty. It'll take hours to get it unstuck.

The effect on bitcoin is a few delayed blocks, while the fast-adjusting bch will have created an anomaly similar to how multi-pools rape altcoins - while getting raped itself and then left for hours to come down. The altcoin market has shown that the fast-adjusting coin is more exploitable and disrupted from multi-pools.

The problem cannot be easily solved for bch because if you try a detection mechanism that checks whether the blocks aren't arriving to do a massive diff cut, then you are going into an uneven mining pattern, accelerating inflation.

BCH is only fast adjusting for difficulty drops when blocks are taking too long.  Miners who want to raise difficulty have the same 2016 block period to deal with.



671. Post 20973443 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: empowering on August 18, 2017, 01:51:41 AM
....one thing I know -  is that the looks on peoples faces,people that you have spoken to about Bitcoin for years, that are sceptical or on the sidelines - the look on all of their faces when you explain Bitcoin and the Bitcoin Fork Bitcoin Cash is pretty much conclusive... and it is a look that says  "glad I am not involved with that shit"


No matter how you dice it- its a shitshow.

One I would much rather had been resolved in another way  Angry

What better way is there of deciding the path forward for a decentralized cryptocurrency than the market?  Perhaps you would prefer some sort of cabal dictating the right answer to the market?



672. Post 21001934 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: Ibian on August 19, 2017, 02:46:06 AM
Do we not know, for a fact, what the mechanical differences between the coins are? Could someone lay it out in a nice easily readable format?

BTC: segwit is locked in, blocks will stay at 1mb for the foreseeable future
2X: potential fork with segwit and 2mb blocks
BCH: segwit rejected, blocks are currently capped at 8mb and will likely rise as demand and technology allows.  The transaction signing format was altered to provide a clean break since it makes each chain's transactions invalid on the other chain.  It also has an extra difficulty adjustment mechanism so that if there are less than 6 blocks in a 12 hour period then difficulty drop 20% to ensure that the chain doesn't stall out.



673. Post 21003755 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: Elwar on August 19, 2017, 05:45:29 AM
I just want to use Bitcoin as a currency. I honestly do not care too much about the small differences between the two chains. They both have SegWit which will allow the Lightning Network which will allow for fast, cheap microtransactions.

Not really. BCH doesn't have Segwit, doesn't fix tx malleability and obviously LN can't play with tx malleability without other workarounds (?). It's just "bigger blocks".

Didn't BCH fork off after the Segwit lock in? Or did they fork with a version that did not include it?

Would make sense as Wu would not want to expose his AsicBoost usage once SegWit gets activated. Much easier to just create a whole separate chain where he can continue to use it to mine blocks at an advantage.

BCH hard fork happened after bip 91 locked in, but before segwit lock in.  Bip 91 forced segwit lock-in because enforcing nodes started rejecting blocks that did not signal segwit.  Bip 91 locking in and the desire to avoid segwit provided much if the impetus for going ahead with the hard fork rather than continuing to fight for consensus.  Segwit was only signaling at 40% until bip 91 locked in.  Bip 91 gained support following the segwit2x agreement.  However, unsurprisingly there is now contention about the 2x part.



674. Post 21003806 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: bitserve on August 19, 2017, 05:54:33 AM
I just want to use Bitcoin as a currency. I honestly do not care too much about the small differences between the two chains. They both have SegWit which will allow the Lightning Network which will allow for fast, cheap microtransactions.

Not really. BCH doesn't have Segwit, doesn't fix tx malleability and obviously LN can't play with tx malleability without other workarounds (?). It's just "bigger blocks".

Didn't BCH fork off after the Segwit lock in? Or did they fork with a version that did not include it?

Would make sense as Wu would not want to expose his AsicBoost usage once SegWit gets activated. Much easier to just create a whole separate chain where he can continue to use it to mine blocks at an advantage.

I think it forked BEFORE lock-in. Anyway, until there are actual Segwit tx's after ACTIVATION the blockchain was compatible. They just took a snapshot of Bitcoin blockchain at 1 Aug and started building blocks on it with their custom rules.

Bitcoin didn't fork. THEY created a completely separate fork, which is not the same.

Bitcoin Cash it is in fact compatible with AsicBoost.

Their custom rules are mostly just larger blocks and mechanisms to ensure transactions for each chain are only valid on one chain to avoid replay attacks.  The full details are here:
https://github.com/Bitcoin-UAHF/spec/blob/master/uahf-technical-spec.md



675. Post 21004541 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: Ibian on August 19, 2017, 06:33:07 AM
I just want to use Bitcoin as a currency. I honestly do not care too much about the small differences between the two chains. They both have SegWit which will allow the Lightning Network which will allow for fast, cheap microtransactions.

Not really. BCH doesn't have Segwit, doesn't fix tx malleability and obviously LN can't play with tx malleability without other workarounds (?). It's just "bigger blocks".

Didn't BCH fork off after the Segwit lock in? Or did they fork with a version that did not include it?

It doesn't include it at all. He forked-off prior to Segwit activation so there are no Segwit transactions in BCH.

Why on earth BCChina support Segwit or god forbid LN? Think people are missing the whole point of this fork. Miners don't make money on LN transaction = miners don't support LN 

Miners don't make money either if fees are very low... Oh, now that I think about it.... Are those calculations about profitability of BCH vs BTC include tx's fees per block? Don't think so....

Think long term global scale. This is just an attempt at a power grab 8MB blocks will be full too. Miners only make money on on-chain txs.

It's way easier to spam blocks when they are already filled by 80-90% legit tx's. They will have a hard time doing the same with 8MB blocks, plus the main argument of BCH is that they will keep upgrading block size way before they are filled. So, basically, less total fees earned no matter what.

It has always been a falacy that it is the miners interest to have bigger blocks. It isn't. But everybody is lieing anyways.
It is, however, in the interest of bitcoin as a whole. Bigger blocks means more people can use it means higher price, and of course wider ability to actually pay with bitcoins in shops and such. And who knows, maybe the extra volume will make it profitable for miners too.

People don't understand supply and demand curves. They think that reducing supply (i.e. raising price) is the only way to increase profitability.  Increasing demand by lowering price is how big companies do it.



676. Post 21117038 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.18h):

Quote from: orpington on August 22, 2017, 10:50:28 PM

...snip...

How the hell is essentially creeping toward centralization being equated with addressing a "most crippling flaw"? lol

We could have 20 MB blocks and it would still be trivial to run a node at home on a single machine.  Mining is at peak centralization now for one reason: ASICs.  There are precious few manufacturers and they are smart enough to realize it is more profitable to just use them then to sell them.  If mining hardware were more widely available there would be much less centralization.  Block size is a red herring.



677. Post 21181948 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote from: arklan on August 25, 2017, 04:59:01 AM

well sure, but... WHY? i mean, how the heck are they expecting to profit?


It seems Legendary accounts are worth to them to join signature campaigns, airdrops, bounties and all that shit. Not that they are gonna profit insanely though. Or none at all.

You can sell a legendary account for at least .1 BTC. If not more. According to Bitcointalk Price estimator mine's worth .18 BTC, although I think that web page overestimates what someone could really get. https://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/?token=85k9uaoq

...well ok then.

Damn... apparently my years of spewing BS has gained me an asset worth 0.32BTC.
https://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/?token=gsettdv8



678. Post 21225982 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.19h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on August 26, 2017, 03:40:38 PM
We need a proof of work change. How low do you think that will drop us?
Something less drastic could also work. Something that wouldn't fck up the "good guys" as much. I'm thinking along the lines of a coinbase penalty depending on mempool size - or something proportional to the average fee of transactions left in the mempool. The main problem I see with such a fix is that it would require a fork. Would a soft fork do? I doubt it, mainly because of the problems with non-upgraded clients.


Won't we have to hard fork for replay protection anyway? (Total noob question.)

Such a coinbase penalty would be messing with the inflation schedule.  Also, the mempool is not consistent across nodes.  A freshly broadcast transaction may not be visible to everyone.  So, we would need mempool commitments.  Something like a blockchain could work for that Wink.



679. Post 21553573 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: arklan on September 06, 2017, 02:44:48 AM
While we're talking about speculative articles, what do you think about this?

Dear Crypto, You’re Being Played By Wall Street
https://medium.com/@JesseLivermore/dear-crypto-youre-being-played-by-wall-street-35a1117ef859

meh. not like it worked, judging by the price.

Yeah, it seems like a lot of work for a 12% dip.



680. Post 21653559 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: bones261 on September 09, 2017, 02:23:59 AM
OK, it's getting depressive taking a bullish aspect. So now I am going to switch to bearish, again. So were can I participate in margin shorting BTC vs fiat, as an American? I would prefer an easy verification process.

You'll be in time to short the bottom.  You know somebody's gotta do it.  Good on ya  Wink

Well, I'm still trying to research which exchange I can participate, as a US citizen, in Margin trading for BTC-USD pair. Kraken seems possible. But I'm so ambivalent, I'm not sure that I want to take the steps to register for yet another exchange. My Keepass is getting to full.  Cheesy
Having a Myers-Brigg personality type of INTP can be so exasperating at times. It's a wonder that I can arrive at any decision.  Cheesy

GDAX (coinbase) has margin trading.



681. Post 21654408 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: bones261 on September 09, 2017, 02:59:42 AM
OK, it's getting depressive taking a bullish aspect. So now I am going to switch to bearish, again. So were can I participate in margin shorting BTC vs fiat, as an American? I would prefer an easy verification process.

You'll be in time to short the bottom.  You know somebody's gotta do it.  Good on ya  Wink

Well, I'm still trying to research which exchange I can participate, as a US citizen, in Margin trading for BTC-USD pair. Kraken seems possible. But I'm so ambivalent, I'm not sure that I want to take the steps to register for yet another exchange. My Keepass is getting to full.  Cheesy
Having a Myers-Brigg personality type of INTP can be so exasperating at times. It's a wonder that I can arrive at any decision.  Cheesy

GDAX (coinbase) has margin trading.

I hardly am anywhere close to being considered an Eligible Contract Participant. Not by a long shot. Not an option for this minnow.

Oh damn, I didn't realize that requirement.  Yeah, that's crazy.



682. Post 21741313 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: YamashitaRen on September 12, 2017, 12:47:45 AM
I shorted at 4600, after the ATH.
I bet on staying sideways until this whole China drama settle. If it goes over 5k in this time frame, then market is still definitely bullish.

But you know, I see a lot of posts here "we reached the bottom, it's going back up, etc..." since we reached ATH. So far, I don't see any strong market movement supporting theses allegations...

Yep.  Me too.  I've mostly bought back in around 4200, but I'm still a little short.



683. Post 21812184 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.20h):

Quote from: lightfoot on September 14, 2017, 02:04:32 AM
Had to sell a bit to cover Q3 taxes and equipment. I hate selling on a dip, drat....

A sign of being overly invested.. in other words, you do not have your expenses projected out on a long enough timeline in order to provide you a large enough float.. whether that float needs to be $1k or $10k or $20k is something for you to determine ( but seems like you don't quite have it down, yet). 

I tend to project my expenses out a minimum of 6 months and frequently into the 18months or more timeline... so a lillie dip like this (and only for about 2 weeks) has not been going on long enough to cause anything close to cash flow pressures - Sure, if it goes on for 6 months or it goes down another 50%, then that could be another story for me, and I would want to start adjusting now for what could happen 6 months from now so I am not selling at the bottom, if that were the case.

Incorrect. I run a business here, one that needs to pay for itself first. If I were to pay for things using pocket money then I would be essentially investing that in bitcoin, which is not my intent. Therefore when I have to buy supplies I batch withdraw some bitcoin and note it in the ledger. Same with taxes and such.

Besides this little dip is in the middle of the most amazing run ever. I don't try to time the market, I let the chips fall where they may.

That's crazy, you should do it the JJG way.  Project your expenses 6 months from now and then sell at the top so you don't have to sell during a "lillie dip".  How hard is that?  If you don't have perfect market timing then you must be "overly invested".

Roll Eyes

Or just put him on ignore.  He is the first and only person I've ever ignored and it is blissful.  So arrogant and loves to see himself type.



684. Post 21884540 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.21h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on September 16, 2017, 01:33:22 AM
I don't know Why but i Just want to make same ATH guess like last time
Rules ....: the one  with the right date of ATH gets .25 btc paid directly  (UTC time)    (closest to ATH.....)
I look to Every page in here from now When a date is picked first iT cannot been taken again ( 1st =1st)
Another .25 btc is rewarded for ho makes best of technical analyse of the time When we strike ATH.... and Why iT happens at that time.....
So This .25 also only to been payed 1 time .... and not 2 times te same explanation.... (1st =1st)

Both answers to win must been inside before 20-09-2017
Goodluck to the ones that like This 

UPDATE listmaking                 notice a * is when the person put good enough explanation for other .25 BTC  (person with no * only play ATH or have to put little better )

19/9 rayx12
25/9 binaryreign*
28/9 khufuking
29/9 jhayzxenon*
30/9 yermom
04/10 minermannc
05/10 punisher1314*
07/10 player514*
10/10 bikerlezno*     LAST WINNER
11/10 ted e. bare
14/10 bitcoinaire*
15/10 ludwigvon*
17/10 shroomskit_disgrace
18/10 dakustaking76
19/10 birobob*
20/10 leowonderful
21/10 paashaas
22/10 cmacwiz*
23/10 spaceman_spiff_original*
25/10 soullyG
28/10 entons*
31/10 twocorn
04/11 lilloboy
05/11 jojo69*
06/11 d_eddie*
07/11 empowering*
09/11 podyx*
10/11 u9y42*
11/11 starving_marvin
13/11 dotto*
14/11 hazukison*
17/11 foxygoxy*
19/11 arriemoller
20/11 drbrockcoin*
22/11 rakessh
21/11 icygreen*
23/11 erisdiscordia
24/11 oblox*
25/11 mfort312*
26/11 globbo*
27/11 lfc_bitcoin
29/11 rjclarck2000
30/11 last of the v8s *
01/12 newworldcoiner*
05/12 fluidjax
08/12 imbatman
10/12 fragout*
11/12 itod
15/12 philivey
18/12 coincube*
24/12 bones261*
26/12 karatma1*
30/12 erre
31/12 elwar
01/01/2018 lewis pirenne*
18/01/2018 raja_mbz*
26/01/2018 kurious*
28/01/2018 steelboy*
18/02/2018 in the silence
20/04/2018 fractal universe*
15/06/2018 samson

hope to still got everybody

October 30th.  It's my birthday, we've retested support and have bounced on good volume.  This is just a correction.



685. Post 21884588 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.21h):

Quote from: bones261 on September 15, 2017, 09:32:38 PM
You would think after almost three years of being involved in the cryptocurrency sphere, that I would know how to trade. But I still am quite clueless. I thought I did well yesterday. I managed to put of few trades together, where I sold higher and then would buy back lower. I didn't catch the absolute crests and troughs, but I did OK with the little bit that I was moving around. I then bought back last night, and left it at that, so I could sleep well at night with a few more satoshis than I had 24 hours ago. This morning, just before work, I saw the market shoot up from a low of almost 2800 USD to a little above $3300. I thought, surely this must be near the peak, so I sold a little bit of my BTC. Now it appears the rally has continued and I find myself stuck with a fiat balance on Gdax. I know that it is recommended not to seek trading advise in this space. However, I really am clueless what to do. Any recommendations? Here are my options.

1) Keep the fiat balance on GDAX, so that I can continue to play around with the market at my leisure, and have both a BTC balance and a fiat balance.
2) Transfer fiat to Paypal and pay off the credit card balance that I have for them. (Coinbase charges a big fee to do this though, and I could probably pay off my balance outright with fiat I already have in the bank anyway.)
3) Buy back your BTC, use this as perfect example that I suck at trading and transfer all my BTC back to cold storage so I can HODL.

Thanks in advance for the advice.  Wink

Read this and learn to read volume: https://robertbrain.com/BullChartsUserGroup/presentations/201604_Kaz_Wyckoff_Anatomy+of+a+Trading+Range.pdf

Look at a few global exchanges to get a clearer picture of global volume.

I won't give specific advice, but I will say I'm hodling long term and currently have a small leveraged long position.  I will likely sell that soon since I am very conservative with my trading funds.



686. Post 21908066 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.21h):

Quote from: RoomBot on September 16, 2017, 06:31:44 PM
New ATH - 28th December 2017. Reason purely because it'll take that long due to recovery from China's bullshit. I think if China hadn't messed us around we would have seen a new ATH earlier.


New ATH gotta be 10/31/2017


Taken.  I'll go with 10/30/2017

That is also taken.  The latest list is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg21895843#msg21895843



687. Post 22034901 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.21h):

Quote from: Ibian on September 20, 2017, 01:02:49 PM
Milo is fabulous.
He also thinks gay kid diddling is a good thing. Never liked him and he lost a lot of support over that.

No arguing with you there. Not going to defend what Milo said in that particular instance.

I will admit he lost a lot of support from me as well.

Normalizing paedophilia is never a good thing.



Isn't the whole "USA should only be a nation of straight white people" thing kinda counter to your...existence?
Majority white, not purely white. At least that's my position.

Immigration is not a bad thing as long as it is very limited in numbers and quality of the immigrants. Morgan Freeman is an excellent person in my estimation, but there are not a lot of Morgan Freemen.

The white drug addicts and welfare queens that infest rural america are terrible people in my estimation, and there are a lot of them.  Race has nothing to do with the quality of a person.



688. Post 22054689 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.21h):

Quote from: Ibian on September 20, 2017, 01:48:21 PM
The push by govt organizations for more immigrants literally everywhere in the world is pretty simple.

Existing citizens are working less (and paying less taxes), and thus having less babies. And that long term trajectory doesn't sit well with the welfare states of the world that are getting deeper and deeper into debt.

Simply put, they desperately need more tax payers coming into the system to not only replace the ones dying off, but to breed new ones. Thus opening up the borders.

Remember, the welfare state is one giant Ponzi scam, that requires ever more scam suckers coming in. When that stops, the whole thing collapses.
The problem of course being that the immigrants turned out to be a net drain on the economy[citation needed], not even counting all the social problems and increases in violent crime and rape. But they always double down on bad ideas.

https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/economic-impact-of-immigration-in-the-us
Quote
Over the long haul, they discovered, the presence of immigrants significantly benefits the economy. Areas with more historical immigration now have higher incomes, lower poverty and unemployment, and greater levels of educational attainment and urbanization.

The magnitude of the results was striking: if a county that experienced no immigration during this period had instead experienced median levels of immigration, residents today would have a 20 percent higher per capita income.



689. Post 22056468 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.21h):

Quote from: Torque on September 21, 2017, 02:53:22 AM

https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/economic-impact-of-immigration-in-the-us
Quote
Over the long haul, they discovered, the presence of immigrants significantly benefits the economy. Areas with more historical immigration now have higher incomes, lower poverty and unemployment, and greater levels of educational attainment and urbanization.

The magnitude of the results was striking: if a county that experienced no immigration during this period had instead experienced median levels of immigration, residents today would have a 20 percent higher per capita income.

A study from the Kellogg School? Heh, they could be just a little biased  Wink Grin

"Kellogg offers full-time, part-time, and executive programs, and partners with schools in China, France/Singapore, India, Spain, Hong Kong, Israel, Germany, Canada, and Thailand. In addition to the Kellogg School campuses in Evanston, Chicago, and Miami, the Kellogg School partners with institutions in Asia, Europe, South America, Australia, the Middle East and Canada.

Kellogg students have the opportunity to study abroad in fall or winter of their second year on six continents. The exchange partner schools offer the opportunity to learn about business from a different perspective, experience another culture, and network with students, faculty, and professionals from around the world. The International Exchange Program at the Kellogg School was started in 1980 with a vision to promote a cultural interchange of ideas and provide a greater understanding of cross-cultural trade and business practices. Since that time, more than 1,000 Kellogg School students have participated in the Exchange Program with schools from over 20 countries, including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, China, Costa Rica, Denmark, France, Germany, Japan, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Scotland, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, The Netherlands, Thailand, and U.K."


So I can't trust any college that has an exchange student program?  Roll Eyes

Still waiting for a citation for Ibian's claim that
Quote
immigrants turned out to be a net drain on the economy



690. Post 22381818 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on September 30, 2017, 02:23:43 AM
Guys, is hodl a paradox? When are we supposed to enjoy our riches? I've never had riches before. Should I be living in a richly place now? I've never lived in a richly place before.

I just don't know.

Pick a small % (somewhere between 5 and 20%) and a starting price.  Every time price doubles from your starting price, sell your chosen percent.  Use a spreadsheet to pick the percent that gives you a mix of fiat and btc you can live with, assuming the wildest valuation you can think of, then stick with it.  If you have spare fiat, buy a fixed $ (or euro, or whatever) amount every week.  Then relax and enjoy the ride.



691. Post 22577800 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: Gab0 on October 05, 2017, 02:56:29 AM
The step in [a] direction was done a few months ago with Segwit and enabling LN.

Neither of which do anything to further the goal of onboarding the world. Whether or not we have Segwit or Lightning, 1MB blocks will require 30 years to get a single transaction to each person on earth. The only way to improve this is with larger blocks.

You have your large blocks in BCH. And according to your previous post, BCH is the one true Bitcoin.

So. what. the. fk. is. the. problem. ?

I was just correcting a flawed assertion by JJG. After the predictable pile-on, this is where we arrive. The only _problem_ per se was the insistence that larger blocks serve no purpose - where demonstrably, they do.

Great. So you have your coin BCH, which you say is the one. You have your 8MB large blocks.  And you have your little tribe of supporters. You should be happy. But for some reason you aren't. Because you keep coming back, trying to argue for more changes to Bitcoin. Trying to change Bitcoin into BCH.

So again. what . the fk. is. YOUR. problem?


Can i ask you what is your problem?
This is an open forum, a place to discuss and interchange different opinions.
You are not even remotely the owner of the truth, and your opinion is one among many very different.
It is by your attitude, your constant lack of reason and good constumbres to exchange opinions, that I consider a troll.

He got lucky and made some money on the internet.  Now he thinks he's a fucking genius.  It's a common problem around here.



692. Post 22578388 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: Torque on October 05, 2017, 03:09:09 AM

He got lucky and made some money on the internet.  Now he thinks he's a fucking genius.  It's a common problem around here.

No, apparently the real geniuses are the accounts on this thread that want to convince everyone that that Bitcoin core developers are completely and woefully incompetent, that Bitcoin still sucks and if it just had bigger blocks it would take over the whole fkn world.

See BCH and their dev team for complete fail.

Why does it make you so upset that other people see the world differently than you do?  If they are as wrong as you believe, you should just let time prove you right.  Instead, you get your panties in a bunch whenever someone says anything you disagree with.



693. Post 22579011 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: DaRude on October 05, 2017, 03:51:55 AM
This is Bitcoin sub forum, not a BCH sub forum. You have the coin with big blocks that you so desperately wanted, and you got it. So again, why do you repeatedly keep coming back here? Why aren't you off with your little tribe?

Oh, I know why. Because you are a troll. Because only a troll keeps coming back to a sub forum thread after they supposedly got what they wanted. Quit trying to 'save' anyone here from anything. We don't need saving. Everyone here knows what Bitcoin is and what BCH is. And people here want to discuss Bitcoin, not BCH. Nor want to discuss how to turn Bitcoin in BCH.

I am discussing Bitcoin. I am discussing Bitcoin Segwit Core, Bitcoin Segwit 2M, and Bitcoin Cash.

Life is a game of probabilities. While I am confident that BCH will eventually be recognized as the One True Bitcoin, only a fool would ascribe 100% to any such outcome. As such, if there is a case for improving Segwit, I am going to make it.

I am decidedly not a troll. Are you a troll? Is Segwit Core 'what you wanted'? Then why do you return to this sub forum?

Yes, we all (most) probably know what Bitcoin is. I doubt, however, that everyone here was complicit with you appointing yourself arbiter as to what may or may not witness being discussed here.

Regardless, it is quite clear that at least some have not yet heard the fact that onboarding the world will take decades at 1MB, and that neither segwit nor LN ameliorates this issue, while block size increases do. If you really want to wallow in willful ignorance, feel free to ignore me. I'd be a little sad -- I seem to remember us having cordial conversations in the past -- but I'd live.

"While I am confident that BCH will eventually be recognized as the One True Bitcoin..." with that logic it's definitely good to diversify so you don't loose all of your money. In due time you'll look back and realize how you were taken for a ride, and thank people who stood up to it  Wink

oh oh do tell how block increases helps on boarding the world? Would you mind doing a simple math on how big your blocks should be for every person in the world to do just one transaction on chain per day? I'll wait

Assuming an average transaction size of 600 bytes and 7.5 billion people:
31.25 GB



694. Post 22579478 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: DaRude on October 05, 2017, 04:11:56 AM
This is Bitcoin sub forum, not a BCH sub forum. You have the coin with big blocks that you so desperately wanted, and you got it. So again, why do you repeatedly keep coming back here? Why aren't you off with your little tribe?

Oh, I know why. Because you are a troll. Because only a troll keeps coming back to a sub forum thread after they supposedly got what they wanted. Quit trying to 'save' anyone here from anything. We don't need saving. Everyone here knows what Bitcoin is and what BCH is. And people here want to discuss Bitcoin, not BCH. Nor want to discuss how to turn Bitcoin in BCH.

I am discussing Bitcoin. I am discussing Bitcoin Segwit Core, Bitcoin Segwit 2M, and Bitcoin Cash.

Life is a game of probabilities. While I am confident that BCH will eventually be recognized as the One True Bitcoin, only a fool would ascribe 100% to any such outcome. As such, if there is a case for improving Segwit, I am going to make it.

I am decidedly not a troll. Are you a troll? Is Segwit Core 'what you wanted'? Then why do you return to this sub forum?

Yes, we all (most) probably know what Bitcoin is. I doubt, however, that everyone here was complicit with you appointing yourself arbiter as to what may or may not witness being discussed here.

Regardless, it is quite clear that at least some have not yet heard the fact that onboarding the world will take decades at 1MB, and that neither segwit nor LN ameliorates this issue, while block size increases do. If you really want to wallow in willful ignorance, feel free to ignore me. I'd be a little sad -- I seem to remember us having cordial conversations in the past -- but I'd live.

"While I am confident that BCH will eventually be recognized as the One True Bitcoin..." with that logic it's definitely good to diversify so you don't loose all of your money. In due time you'll look back and realize how you were taken for a ride, and thank people who stood up to it  Wink

oh oh do tell how block increases helps on boarding the world? Would you mind doing a simple math on how big your blocks should be for every person in the world to do just one transaction on chain per day? I'll wait

Assuming an average transaction size of 600 bytes and 7.5 billion people:
31.25 GB

But that's still less than unlimited right? Hmm maybe BU was actually on to something  Grin

Hey, you could keep up if you had a 425 Mbps connection Tongue



695. Post 22622117 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: d_eddie on October 06, 2017, 02:15:10 AM
If there are 7 billion people in the world, then 1% would be 70 million using bitcoin in some kind of way... Are we even close to that?  

Obviously not. It would take about 280 days to make 70 million transactions on today's Bitcoin Core. Over a month on Bitcoin Cash, which is still too long, but nearly an order of magnitude better. Because big blocks.

... and because abnormal block production rate due to fickle difficulty adjusting mechanisms. Let's tell it all.

But I have a question for you, or whoever else may be able to answer:

I'm just trying to point out that there is at least one alternative method that a transaction originator can use to split their coins, which does not suffer these drawbacks.

(Namely, including coins from a post-fork transaction in the "splitting" transaction. Can't find jbreher's other post for a proper quote.)

Apart from a coinbase transaction, which outputs would qualify? In other words, can a simple guy set up such a splitting transaction without access to a freshly mined block?

Any descendant transaction would also be valid.  An exchange could split all their coins once they have access to a single UTXO that is unique to one chain.  There will likely be services (and exchanges) that accept a dual transaction to a single address (valid on both chains), and then either send you or credit your account with split coins.



696. Post 22629226 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: Meuh6879 on October 06, 2017, 08:11:09 AM
SegWit work.
Really.




Peak is Aug 1, on the decline since.  BTC denominated chart is even more pronounced, but the price rise helps this one to look a bit better.



697. Post 22740896 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.22h):

Quote from: DaRude on October 09, 2017, 01:53:19 AM
It does seem that BCH efforts are being redirected in what i can only assume is anticipation of seg2x but  they kinda shot themselves in the foot and now have to keep two fronts open. They're spreading thin and can't go in either direction without pissing off their support base. It's ironic that they undermined themselves with a BCH, as without it it'd be much easier for them to rally troops behind 2x

If they were smart, they would have forgot about 2x and just did a soft fork of segwit onto bch.  Segwit 8X FTW.



698. Post 24606390 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: pfrtlpfmpf on November 15, 2017, 05:16:22 AM
MrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumpe ritisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMr pumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperi tisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpu mperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperiti sMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpump eritisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisM rpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumper itisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrp umperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperit isMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpum peritisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitis MrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumpe ritisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMr pumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperi tisMrpumperitisMrpumperitis



I didn´t count, but i´m sure, you cheated somewhere.  Smiley

Anyway, i like the "prosperity is around the corner" part !


Quote
$ echo 'MrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumpe ritisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMr pumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperi tisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpu mperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperiti sMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpump eritisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisM rpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumper itisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrp umperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperit isMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpum peritisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitis MrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumpe ritisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMr pumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperitisMrpumperi tisMrpumperitisMrpumperitis' | perl -p -e 's/ //g'  | perl -p -e 's/Mrpumperitis/1/g' | wc -c
102

he gave you two extra



699. Post 24724787 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: jjacob on November 17, 2017, 08:03:39 AM
It's correction time.

Even if we are correcting, the money seems to be flowing out of Bitcoin and into Bitcoin Cash. The original Bitcoin holders ate not losing much. But if you took a punt and dumped your Bitcoin cash, then you are exposed to more volatility.

Yep, and those of us who were hodlers of both sides were labelled fools and shills.  You've got to be a special kind of cocky to think only one side of a contentious fork is valuable and that you can pick which side that is immediately after the fork.  Clearly there are people who value each path.  That's why it is contentious.



700. Post 24725573 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: AlexGR on November 17, 2017, 08:19:41 AM
Yep, and those of us who were hodlers of both sides were labelled fools and shills.  You've got to be a special kind of cocky to think only one side of a contentious fork is valuable and that you can pick which side that is immediately after the fork.  Clearly there are people who value each path.  That's why it is contentious.

A contentious fork is something different. BCH was not launched as a result of a contentious fork, more like an altcoin with a shared tx history but with different parameters.

A major catalyst for BCH was segwit being forced down miners throats when less than the original threshold was in favor of it.  BCH forked off to avoid segwit and increase blocksize.  How is that not a contentious fork?  BCH is arguably much close to the original bitcoin than the chain with the BTC symbol.

I'm not saying that BCH is the one true bitcoin or that it will surpass BTC in price.  But there is no reason to think it doesn't have value.  Of course, by now I should know that trying to be reasonable about the situation in here is about as productive as yelling into a hurricane.



701. Post 24769810 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.27h):

Quote from: AlexGR on November 17, 2017, 08:57:30 AM
Yep, and those of us who were hodlers of both sides were labelled fools and shills.  You've got to be a special kind of cocky to think only one side of a contentious fork is valuable and that you can pick which side that is immediately after the fork.  Clearly there are people who value each path.  That's why it is contentious.

A contentious fork is something different. BCH was not launched as a result of a contentious fork, more like an altcoin with a shared tx history but with different parameters.

A major catalyst for BCH was segwit being forced down miners throats when less than the original threshold was in favor of it.

IIRC the code was rather clear that in case of less than X% miner adoption segwit wouldn't happen, with X being something like 90-95%... how is that "forcing" miners? Segwit only happened because the miners signaled in favor of it - even though some had a twist (2x) to it.

https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0148.mediawiki

Support was at around 40 percent.  Then BIP-148 came along and threatened to disconnect any nodes that relayed blocks that were not signaling for segwit.  At that point, you either signal or stop mining, so miners signaled.  They were also encouraged by strong support (90%+) for the segwit2x agreement, which turned out to be a joke.

Quote
Quote
BCH forked off to avoid segwit and increase blocksize.  How is that not a contentious fork?

One morning Wu decided that if btc goes with segwit he will launch his altcoin. This is unilateral action. It's like me deciding that I want to launch bitcoin <another name here> for whatever reason. It's not an organic split like what happened, say, in ETH, where the devs proposed a change and some people stuck with the old chain where "code is law". There's a difference. Even Wu won't claim BCH is Bitcoin. He says it's something different. At least he's honest about it.

There is a very large community of bitcoiners besides Wu involved with BCH.  If you never venture out of bitcointalk.org or /r/bitcoin, I can't blame you for being blind to it.  Censorship tends to create echo chambers, to the detriment of the people in those chambers.  I never made the claim that BCH is Bitcoin.  Clearly that moniker is more closely associated with the Segwit chain.  But that may change with time.  My claim is that BCH is more closely aligned with Satoshi's whitepaper.  At 1MB and with 2 week difficulty adjustment, the segwit chain is much more fragile than BCH.  BCH's mempool has not ever seen backlog and now that the difficulty adjustment algorithm has been upgraded, blocks times are much more reliable than the segwit chain.



702. Post 26816994 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.34h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on December 23, 2017, 12:21:41 AM
Breaking 24777$ prediction game


27/12/2017 bikerleszno
30/12/2017 digithusiast
31/12/2017 Raja_MBZ
01/01/2018 elg
02/01/2018 wachtwoord
04/01/2018 d_eddie
05/01/2018 BTCMILLIONAIRE
06/01/2018 HanvanBitcoin
07/01/2018 ghandi
08/01/2018 savetherainforrest
09/01/2018 explorer
10/01/2018 bicoinpsycho
11/01/2018 Bitcoinaire
12/01/2018 speedwheel
13/01/2018 undeadbitcoiner
14/01/2018 northypole
15/01/2018 ivomm
16/01/2018 maca068
17/01/2018 bitcoinvest
18/01/2018 last of the v8s
19/01/2018 mfort312
20/01/2018 1982dre
21/01/2018 flamast2
22/01/2018 RealMachasm
23/01/2018 willope
24/01/2018 kartala
25/01/2018 orpington
26/01/2018 rolling
27/01/2018 LFC_bitcoin
28/01/2018 jojo69
29/01/2018 CristiTCM
30/01/2018 rayX12
31/01/2018 realsteelboy
01/02/2018 twocorn
02/02/2018 mancroofer
03/02/2018 True Myth
04/02/2018 poolminor
05/02/2018 itod
06/02/2018 scheptan
07/02/2018 vapourminer
08/02/2018 alexeft
09/02/2018 siera
12/02/2018 yonton
13/02/2018 Wekkel
14/02/2018 Thekool1s
15/02/2018 starmman
16/02/2018 Globb0
17/02/2018 leveldkrypto
18/02/2018 olesh
19/02/2018 BitCoinBurger
20/02/2018 Paashaas
21/02/2018 flynn
22/02/2018 icygreen
23/02/2018 erisdiscordia
24/02/2018 phil_s
25/02/2018 sirazimuth
26/02/2018 Arriemoller
27/02/2018 yonton
01/03/2018 bones261
06/03/2018 sa_94
07/03/2018 NUFCrichard
08/03/2018 Imbatman
10/03/2018 STT
11/03/2018 badream
13/03/2018 erre
15/03/2018 podyx
17/03/2018 fragout
18/03/2018 fabiorem
21/03/2018 dakustaking76
23/03/2018 nikauforest
31/03/2018 vroom
01/04/2018 somac.
02/04/2018 kurious
05/04/2018 bitcoinbunny
10/04/2018 ludwigvon
11/04/2018 hairymaclairy
27/04/2018 drbrockoin
01/05/2018 sprinkles
02/06/2018 oblox
03/08/2018 toxic2040
05/11/2018 mikenz
31/12/2018 melman2002
12/02/2019 FractalUniverse
21/04/2019 gentlemand
20/02/2020 romneymoney
18/12/2021 luckygenough56


Maybe because its This time of the year we make a small game Just to call 24777$ (CET) the one with the day of breaking This price wins .25 BTC
The list Will be Made after This post So When a date is taking iT cannot been taken again
When the winning date is exactly in the middle of 2 each Will get .25
Oterwhise closest to the winning date wins

LIST MAKING ENDS 25-12-2017  @ 22.00 cet

SOME HAVE TAKEN A DATE THATS ALLREADY OCCUPIED      -fluidjax
                                                                                       -vito5
                                                                                       -Dotto
                                                                                       -Ibian
                                                                                       -
                                                                                       -
                                                                                       -
              TAKE DIFFRENT DATE PLEASE , THE DATES YOU GUYS PICKED WHERE TAKEN

Last update for tonight                                                       MANY PAGES BACK I POSTED MINIMUM ACTIVITIE 50+ TO COME ON THE LIST TO MANY NEW ACCOUNTS GR

March 5 2018 please



703. Post 27953300 (copy this link) (by notme) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.38h):

Quote from: jojo69 on January 12, 2018, 04:11:42 AM
I hope somebody screenshotted that Kraken status update

he thought better of it and took it down

I don't have a screenshot, but I copied it:
Quote
I fell asleep at my desk. In a dream, the ghost of a butterfly from the future whispered to me "the dollar hit 0 bitcoin". I wake up, people around me dabbing the blood from their eyes. Progress has been made but not enough. I crack my whip -- "we aren't getting to zero like this!". The flogging will continue until morale improves. Expect another update after I make my rounds. I'm sorry I've let you down.