All posts made by SlipperySlope in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 1870103 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.53h):

Quote
doesn't anyone else see the similarities?

Yes. Perhaps the rate of decline is faster this time because traders have the first bubble as a reference.



2. Post 1912390 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):



Looks to me that tops are trending lower and support holding at 110. Could this develop into a channel or will the depth squeeze be resolved with a break upwards or downwards?



3. Post 1912608 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: phatsphere on April 22, 2013, 04:40:42 PM


Looks to me that tops are trending lower and support holding at 110. Could this develop into a channel or will the depth squeeze be resolved with a break upwards or downwards?
If this correct it will go down.

Just before the pattern I outlined, approximately 120K BTC were purchased between $100 and $136, if prices drop those traders - if still holding, will be at a loss and be highly motivated to capitulate. If only 60K BTC sold at once, bids would be consumed down to $83, from where I would expect a nearly full recovery back to say $110 - 120.



4. Post 1914262 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote
I am fairly curious myself as to what the volume actually stands for.

What beyond this definition are you asking for?

Quote
Investopedia explains 'Volume'

Volume is an important indicator in technical analysis as it is used to measure the worth of a market move. If the markets have made strong price move either up or down the perceived strength of that move depends on the volume for that period. The higher the volume during that price move the more significant the move.



5. Post 1916302 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Resistance. But is there follow-on?



6. Post 1916319 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Can someone explain why dump 4500K BTC on the market with such slippage. Are there not trading programs that will slice the order up into smaller, random appearing pieces and consume tasty bids from time to time until the whole order is filled? One could do that manually too.



7. Post 1920464 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Kveras on April 23, 2013, 01:32:35 PM
Sent money to the exchange today. Prices are bound to go up with at least 25% the next 2 days with my luck. Smiley

Shall I sell my BTC, that would make the price explode for sure!

I find these indicators to be the most reliable, far better than all the TA. My theory is: "The price moves in the direction that creates the most grief for the highest amount of people."
Right! Financial markets are zero-sum games. If a trader makes a profit, there is a corresponding loss somewhere else. Pareto's Principal, I think applies to the proportion of traders that profit the most, i.e. 20% of traders make 80% of profit. Accordingly, most traders suffer - they may profit but not as much as the 'average'.



8. Post 1985544 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Watching trades today, I see most large ones are sales.



9. Post 1986294 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Cablez on April 30, 2013, 03:41:15 PM
Has anyone tried to analyze what these short down moves are trying to accomplish?  It does not seem to be to just suppress price as it always bounces back fairly quickly.
What is the underlying motive then? Just trying to learn.

Either profit-taking - which is the case for buyers after April 12, or stop loss - which is the case for buyers above current prices. In the first case, the motive is to realize a gain in dollars. In the second case the motive is to prevent further losses. I do not impute a manipulation motive where greed and fear are sufficient.



10. Post 1986386 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: fitty on April 30, 2013, 03:50:59 PM
Trying to accomplish? Nothing, people are selling...

I'm skeptical that a 5k market order to sell is the best way to get the most money for your 5k coins. It's also odd to see fairly large asks walls pop up right at the bottom of the drop.

Agreed, I asked that question some days ago. There appears to be a significant amount of large-order trading that is sub-optimal, in that certain alternative tactics may be better: a limit order lets the other side come to you with no slippage, or a big order should be sliced up and targeted at select counter offers over a period of time - and program trading can automate that too.



11. Post 1991103 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Maybe stable around 135 for a while. Lots of support there in the past.



12. Post 1991229 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

My asks back at 140 were taken.



13. Post 1991331 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

The selling pressure just keeps coming. Funny ask wall gone now.





14. Post 1991415 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Walls after the move down to 132.



15. Post 1991424 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Threatening ask wall.




16. Post 1991743 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Anyone see a buy order get a piece of one of these ephemeral walls?



17. Post 1994282 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Relentless selling pressure.




18. Post 1994628 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
So are bear traps self fulfilling in that someone just has to keep smacking the price around enough that investors lose faith or get bored or whatever long enough that the money flows out?

I do not understand what you mean. Here is a common definition of a bear trap from Investopedia ...

Quote
A false signal that the rising trend of a stock or index has reversed when it has not. A bear trap prompts traders to place shorts on the stock or index, since they expect the underlying to decline in value. Instead of declining further, the investment stays flat, or slightly recovers.




19. Post 1994787 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Yet another triangle. Momentum building to break through below $127.




20. Post 1997550 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
I also trade for other entities than my personal position so actually it would be best to not listen to me at all.

You should put that in your signature.



21. Post 1998004 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
There is of course the possibility that we see both 25 USD and 250000 USD per BTC within the next five years. 

+1



22. Post 1998554 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Is that a real ask wall at 121? Could put a cap on the move upwards if bid volume drops down.




23. Post 1999441 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):



There is now a mighty mass of bitcoins purchased since April 1 above current levels and yet unsold. Back in August 2011, the first and greatest capitulation of that bubble had two legs, dropping over three days. I believe the situation permits a breather at ~115 for a day, then another deep plunge - to the extent that a single carefully selected instance from 2011 serves to model all such bitcoin bubbles.



24. Post 2004430 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):



Support at $107 holding back a further drop at the moment.



25. Post 2004544 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
The bottom was $104 not $107.

Sorry for not being clear. $104 is a convenient place for the bid wall that is a substantial part of the support.



26. Post 2010550 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
I was thinking more like landscape mapping with different colours.
Then the evolution of the walls over time would become a valley (or a canyon) and the price would be a river flowing in it.
EM had the idea posted here that the 3 D chart should denote age of the limit order by color [or intensity].



27. Post 2010748 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):



Breaking back down below $105 could be an important confirmation of the resumption of the capitulation from $145.



28. Post 2010875 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

$100 wall held. But maybe the remaining part of the wall is held by the seller who wants to corral sizable bids above $100 for later consumption.



29. Post 2012456 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):




30. Post 2012568 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 03, 2013, 02:48:28 AM


No analysis?

Sorry, short of time - preparing for a good night's sleep with buy orders in place. It make take a few more days to complete this capitulation, to the degree that this capitulation is indeed similar to the corresponding one back in 2011.

Accordingly, this capitulation may be the greatest of this bubble collapse, but it will not be the last one and will not be the bottom.



31. Post 2012771 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: solex on May 03, 2013, 03:06:05 AM
Accordingly, this capitulation may be the greatest of this bubble collapse, but it will not be the last one and will not be the bottom.

This capitulation at $91. Have you forgotten the bottom at $50 two weeks ago?
Are you predicting a bottom below that?


Understand that my time context is the entire bubble collapse, which I expect to be roughly three months after the peak on April 10. Yes, $50 is not the bottom - that is the nature of a speculative financial bubble collapse. Evidence shows that the bottom is deeper than most expect and takes about as long to occur as the bubble took to form in the first place. I believe the bubble started January 7, 2013 at $13.50. The underlying trend I think allows for a bottom well under $50.



32. Post 2012859 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
I'm curious how you think the coin lab vs. Mt.Box lawsuit will affect prices.

http://gawker.com/so-a-currency-that-fluctuates-wildly-with-the-ebbs-and-487994806

I'm still relatively new to the BTC market, but surely the price would go down further in light of such news.

I believe that this is huge but not immediate.

From the article ...
Quote
What tipped us into filing was our complete inability to get Mt. Gox to deliver on the few simple things left that were needed for customers to move over en-masse; we were often left just apologizing to our alpha customers while their own businesses suffered. I'm just not willing to put any of our customers in that position — if we can't do a good job for you, I won't promise that we can.

It is huge because Mt. Gox will react to the suit instead of spending all their time fighting DDoS attacks.



33. Post 2013039 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
I hope you realize that I am one of the precious few fulltimers that can actually, fundamentally, better the situation they have there (the single point of failure called Mt.Gox). Just read my diary and all the associated things, such as the supernode summit, dealer network etc.

Yes, and best wishes on your attempts, and those who you influence, to overcome the barriers that prevent big money investors, traders and merchants from smoothly accessing and using bitcoins. There are many win-win situations to be found and exploited.



34. Post 2014933 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):



I followed advice on Reddit to add this domain to my /etc/hosts file. It worked.



35. Post 2014955 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
That battle is spilling so much blood (fiat), removed my bids at 70,  there will be many unfathomable bottoms ahead..

Hmmm. I have not adjusted my remaining sleep-at-night bids, as I expected this capitulation to unfold almost exactly as did the first capitulation from the 2011 bubble. That one dropped 55% from the start, and this one has only gone down 45% from $145. I may split my lowest bid and issue an additional buy limit order even lower. I will not feel really comfortable with my handling of this capitulation unless I miss a bit on the downside of it.



36. Post 2014993 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
My buy orders are now set at $75 and $52

I have a spread but not nearly as low as you. Hopefully I will be completely back in bitcoin in a couple of days. The first, and greatest capitulation, of bubble 1 took six days to reach bottom. In this corresponding capitulation we have been dropping for only three days from $145 ...



37. Post 2015037 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
I found you guys!

Yay! Should be a lot of attention paid to the bid wall at $70 by hungry fiat-laden traders today.



38. Post 2015082 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: samson on May 03, 2013, 01:17:35 PM
To buy or to wait, just woke up?

Wait, it's a long drop and a long weekend.

I could not sleep without pre-positioned limit orders. Two of mine filled while I was asleep a couple of hours ago and I am very satisfied. We could get goxlag again today and you might not be able to reach the exchange to place a realtime order.




39. Post 2015135 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):



Then lower I believe.



40. Post 2015173 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
We may be breaking out of this channel.

Yep.



41. Post 2015211 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
You think bitcointalk being back online is helping this rally?

Yes, I think lack of information motivates selling - or otherwise a retreat to safety, whereas sufficient information bolsters confidence, e.g. to bargain hunt in this situation.



42. Post 2015221 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
I guess that means I should probably change my password.

Not necessarily, see what the official explanation is. Domain hacking affects domain name servers, not the web server hosting the forum - right?



43. Post 2015235 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
Have fun guys.

Indeed this is fun - so, so much better than back in bubble 1.



44. Post 2015331 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):



If there indeed is another leg down, and it has similar dimensions, then we could see an approach down to $70 in about 24 hours.

However volume typically drops off on Friday afternoon and over the weekend. The bottom of the capitulation may not therefore occur until Monday. Back in August 2011, the bottom of the first and greatest capitulation was a massive, high volume sell off, dropping the last 15% in two hours - which is the sort of volume one could expect on Monday.



45. Post 2015448 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):



The next several hours will reveal whether the price movement stays in the channel.



46. Post 2015511 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: AmazonStuff on May 03, 2013, 02:35:33 PM
I guess this was I,II,III,IV,V, let's see what will happen in the future  Smiley

Are not especially powerful price movements often characterized by extensions in EW analysis?

What we have here is a great capitulation in the wake of the biggest bitcoin bubble collapse to date. Above $110, sellers may be motivated by profit-taking, but below $110 nearly everyone who bought BTC between April 1 and May 2 is not taking profits when they sell, they are staunching a loss, and potentially very big losses. And on the other hand, smart money that sold above current levels is strongly motivated by bargain hunting. These two forces, distressed sellers and bargain-hunting buyers, oscillate in initiative thus causing the wave patterns - right?



47. Post 2015583 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 03, 2013, 02:40:50 PM
me and my fiat are taking a break this weekend. I think maybe it's not dissapearing into coins but it's just off the order book. I have no idea what to bid at the moment.

I just put lots of bids from $75 down to $10. Whatever the bottom is I'll catch a good chunk of it.

what is the best strategy for doing this?

I usually pick a spot where I want to begin, and double the amount I'm going to buy the lower it gets.

So for example
0.1BTC @ $80
0.2BTC @ $78
0.4BTC @ $76
0.8BTC @ $74


etc.

I'm sure theres different strategies for this but I find this one the most logical sounding.

I have a most likely price target in mind beforehand. For example, a couple of days ago I obtained a price target for this capitulation by way of comparison with the first and greatest capitulation of bubble 1. That one had a 55% drop from the top. This one started at $145 and my price target was therefore $65. I created pre-positioned buy limit orders at Mt. Gox for $95, $87, $80, $76, and $65. Based upon the relentless selling pressure today, I split the lowest bid and created a new bid at $60. Regarding order size, I use a rough gaussian distribution, i.e. bell curve, that heavily weights the orders in the center of the spread. In a sort of monte carlo analysis, I expect the majority of my orders to get filled, but not necessarily the lowest one(s).

My buy points illustrated above are in whole numbers, the actual orders are positioned according to the nearby bid walls, i.e. my orders are relatively small and I want them filled before the 1000+ BTC orders commonly placed at whole numbers as walls.

These execution tactics are new to me. I vowed during the last bitcoin bubble to learn - and to profit accordingly.



48. Post 2015685 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
just missed it

The previous pause was six hours long and the one before that was 12 hours long. I recommend patience - or maybe limit buy orders.



49. Post 2015714 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: SAQ on May 03, 2013, 03:12:34 PM
There seems to be a lot of support at 97, I can't see it breaking.

For bottom though it seems that 79 is it for today.

In trader talk, you meant resistance at 97, right?



50. Post 2015773 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
For bottom though it seems that 79 is it for today.

Supposing that this pause at $96 turns downward within a couple of hours, there could be enough high-volume hours remaining today so that a wall-busting panic-selling spike down to $70 might just happen, e.g. in the blind due to goxlag. Otherwise, I think your assessment is likely.



51. Post 2016212 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: Jaroslaw on May 03, 2013, 04:07:23 PM
Anyone see reptielia guy ? i think he might commit susicide after loosing so much money Cheesy

Risto has changed his mind. He said that if prices drop he will buy more.

As matter of fact, I applaud his efforts as an experienced, professional  bitcoin broker/dealer to create infrastructure that will gain him even more clients. There is a crude cliche that applies, at least partially to his behavior - Fake it until you make it.

I expect Risto to make it.



52. Post 2017448 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

And yet another triangle. Duh ... make that one hour - not four hours as it says in the immutable image below.




53. Post 2017819 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Does anyone else think that volume has dropped off? If so then no wall-busting power until likely Monday.




54. Post 2018020 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

It is getting quiet in my home office - no Clark Moody ding-ding-O-meter chattering away !

Despite the calm, I don't envy big money and their advisors that are holding maybe 25% losses in just three days, with a potential goxlag-blinded Black Monday sell off. That unfortunate group knows that the first one to sell gets the tastiest bids and the last one to sell books the biggest client loss. They cannot sell during the weekend without huge slippage.

A band-break at the bagholder's ball.
 



55. Post 2018216 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: underground_ on May 03, 2013, 07:39:27 PM
It is getting quiet in my home office - no Clark Moody ding-ding-O-meter chattering away.

Despite the calm, I don't envy big money and their advisors that are holding maybe 25% losses in just three days, with a potential goxlag-blinded Black Monday sell off. That unfortunate group knows that the first one to sell gets the tastiest bids and the last one to sell books the biggest client loss. They cannot sell during the weekend without huge slippage.
 

That's why I immediately sold what I'd bought in the $80s when we went back over $90. One single whale dump will be enough to get things rolling downwards again.

Yes, but those very whales have been taking recent weekends off. On the other hand, if this is really the biggest and baddest capitulation of 2012, 2013 and probably all of 2014, then yes we could crash big this evening or this weekend.

Because I plan only one set of relatively low risk and highly profitable (should events unfold as planned) round-trip trades per capitulation, I really don't have to pay attention to the embedded day trading opportunities.



56. Post 2018794 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

I am considering a limit sell order in case some big, 9000+ BTC buyer says damn all to slippage over the weekend. Biased to the downside for three days, sell at say $105 this weekend, anticipating a buy back on Monday morning below $90?



57. Post 2018833 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: arepo on May 03, 2013, 08:41:10 PM
And yet another triangle. Duh ... make that one hour - not four hours as it says in the immutable image below.



how did you come up with a downward direction here? i see the triangle, but triangle formations themselves tend not to have directional bias. by my analysis we've reached a short-term bottom.

Hey, when the first team is off the field, they send in the likes of me.

I saw the channel containing the embedded pattern. Regarding nested patterns, to what degree are containing patterns influential with regard to immediately contained technical patterns?



58. Post 2018877 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on May 03, 2013, 08:50:42 PM
So now almost everyone is a bear? Investor cycle says we are going up then.  Tongue

I accuse you, yes you, of selection bias.



59. Post 2018949 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote
we've reached a short-term bottom. rebound is likely,

Your analysis makes me feel comfortable with a prudent-sized profit-taking limit order for the weekend positioned in front of the ask wall at $105, using some of the lots bought at $87 and $80.

Based solely upon a comparison with the corresponding August 1, 2011 capitulation, I believe that this bottom of this capitulation could still be two or three days away, i.e. Monday, and could also feature a 15% culminating selling blow-off as did the comparison. And most importantly, I believe that this bottom is not the post-bubble bottom.

For reference, I have dubbed this one the Great Capitulation of 2013 - none bigger.



60. Post 2019081 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 03, 2013, 09:03:09 PM
Let's throw random numbers and see who's gonna be right on monday then?

I'm calling $65, Monday. 8PM UTC.

OK, not actionable advice - just one of many likely instantiated scenarios. Suppose it unfolds sort of like back in August 2011 ...

Stopped by the ask wall at $70 early Monday morning in the USA. Two hour goxlag-blinded drop below $85 to reach the wall and bounce back. Mt. Gox wall-busting volume over 25000 each of those two hours.  Clark Moody ding-ding-O-Meter chatters like a jackhammer with red orders flying past and huge spreads between bid and asked.



61. Post 2020591 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Breaking out of a triangle on the 15-min chart - in relatively thin volume. Technical analysts consider a low volume move to be less significant.

This move however is squarely blocked by my ask in front of the wall at $105. Will it get eaten?






62. Post 2020668 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: SAQ on May 04, 2013, 12:24:52 AM
That's your wall?

It will be eaten without being chewed at all I say

My open limit orders are not walls - they are way smaller than that. I simply place them in front of walls so that they get filled by the matching engine before the wall below my order in the case of a bid, or the wall above my order in the case of a bid.



63. Post 2023736 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):



I sold a bit at $100 and $103 and am currently positioned to sell more at $105. Back to bed.



64. Post 2025905 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):



My highest ask at $104.5 got filled an hour ago, and the one day rally is still going.



65. Post 2035833 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):



Recent price action is within the lower part of the wall-indicated channel.



66. Post 2046810 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):



It appears to me that the capitulation pattern from $145 to $80 has ended. Three days to fall to $80, and three days to recover back to $124.

Question whether the price will surpass $145 or $160 this month - I believe not, based upon the notion that we are in a collapsing bubble.





67. Post 2047207 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote
So, you think the capitulation is over and we are on the way up?

Man, bulls turning bears and bears turning bulls, I'm really puzzled

As everyone here probably knows, I am a long term bull attempting to multiply my bitcoins by trading this bubble, which compels me to adopt bearish tactics as the opportunity presents.





68. Post 2047301 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote
I really expect a bigger correction during this week, selling pressure is quite high, and obviously new money stopped pouring in (or it just slowed down when compared to the times we were in parabolic growth).

When traders say that bitcoin has passed from weak hands to strong ones, they are describing a mechanism that prolongs a bubble collapse.

Certain traders holding losing positions (the weak hands) stop-loss sell to new buyers who can withstand a bit of a drop (the strong hands), until the latter in turn sell as they become the weak hands - right?

I believe that the bubble collapse will take the approximately the same duration as the bubble expansion phase - approximately three months. Plenty of time for more capitulations before the final bottom of this bubble - I think.



69. Post 2047468 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Richy_T on May 06, 2013, 01:31:20 PM
Stamp is date and time in unix time with with microsecond precision of the last change.

Oh, I figured the unix time thing. I just wasn't sure what it signifies.

A few months ago I wrote a Java websocket/socket.io client for Mt. Gox that processes the depth chart to explore my notions about depth and tick data. The ChartBuddy 3-D depth chart periodically posted here shows the time dimension like I wanted - so no point in going further. But I did learn enough about the Mt. Gox API to very deeply appreciate the cleverness employed by Clark Moody who ties together Mt. Gox trades and depth changes.

The Mt. Gox HTTP API allows the client to poll the server in order to obtain partial or the full depth list of bids and asks. Then its websocket/socket.io API allows the client to subscribe to trades, depth changes, and lag. Subsequently the client receives notification of depth changes, which is the change and new amount of the limit bid or ask orders at a certain price at a certain time, i.e. the time the limit order was issued/cancelled. What is crazy is that Mt. Gox drops the connection, or otherwise loses synchronization between the trades and the depth chart. Clark Moody's realtime charting app dynamically fixes all this up. Its not precise - but it is very satisfactory, by polling the server to replace the client depth info when it gets out of sync.

I can answer detailed protocol questions about the Mt. Gox API as regard to charting data, but not much at all regarding the trading functions.



70. Post 2047576 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: SAQ on May 06, 2013, 12:49:18 PM

BTW, what does everyone think the top will be before we dive downwards again?

I say 180
I would feel even more confident about my bitcoin bubble assumptions if the price did not exceed $145 again before the final bottom.



71. Post 2047630 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote
Gotta be able to turn on a dime in the prediction business.

That just about sums up trend-following TA.



72. Post 2047914 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Richy_T on May 06, 2013, 02:23:40 PM

A few months ago I wrote a Java websocket/socket.io client for Mt. Gox that processes the depth chart to explore my notions about depth and tick data. The ChartBuddy 3-D depth chart periodically posted here shows the time dimension like I wanted - so no point in going further. But I did learn enough about the Mt. Gox API to very deeply appreciate the cleverness employed by Clark Moody who ties together Mt. Gox trades and depth changes.


I wanted to do the socket.io thing (and still do for another project) but found it poorly documented and jumped on the http in the end. I still need to figure out why I appear to be regularly missing the first few minutes each hour from Gox. It's not always but it's often enough to be annoying.

I use the Chrome web browser. Its tools permit the monitoring of the TCP traffic between client and server - and so I watch Clark Moody's app to confirm the socket.io API that Mt. Gox uses. I likewise found Mt.Gox performance to be annoying.



73. Post 2047991 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Richy_T on May 06, 2013, 02:35:09 PM

I use the Chrome web browser. Its tools permit the monitoring of the TCP traffic between client and server - and so I watch Clark Moody's app to confirm the socket.io API that Mt. Gox uses. I likewise found Mt.Gox performance to be annoying.

It's not so much the API as the socket.io thing. I'm sure I can work it out though. I want to write an app for Android so I can see the charts realtime like a picture viewer without having to do a browser deal. Though probably someone has already done that. Often seems to be the way these days.

Coincidentally, the same websocket library I got working a year ago for Android, was the one that I grafted socket.io capability onto in my recent Java desktop app. Your idea should work fine. Getting the realtime depth list synched up with trades is not easy due to the fact that Mt. Gox appears to have separate server processes providing this information, without Consistency as defined by database folks.



74. Post 2048096 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):



Risto = rpietila



75. Post 2048179 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Significant volume on this hourly red candle amplifies the importance of this movement. Will volume increase next hour?



76. Post 2048736 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: cedivad on May 06, 2013, 03:12:43 PM
Manipulator... Everyone in this thread is a manipulator.
Even in multi-player zero-sum games there may be significant advantages to players, i.e. win-win situations, resulting from the sharing of noisy or misleading information.

I am here because I believe that what I learn helps me to multiply my bitcoins. I do not believe that what I say meaningfully affects the bitcoin exchange market, and the criticism my ideas receive is easier to accept than lessons taught solely by the market.



77. Post 2049031 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote
But the truth is that after the April, 10th crash we had days with HUGE volume. Damn, we had two days where we had ATH volume. I really believe the bigger sell off has already happened - and that was April, 16th, where we had +BTC550k sold. I could bet we won't have a single day with that volume in the next month, unless something really disruptive happens (I mean a really big technical problem, etc.)

To the degree that this bubble collapse behaves like the June 2011 collapse, it is normal for the big sell off to happen first. That's why I dubbed the August , 2011 capitulation The Great Capitulation of 2011. I believe the drop from $145 to $80 is the corresponding Great Capitulation of 2013. If my ideas are correct, then its likely we have seen the worst one this year.

Here is what happened with regard to volume back during the collapse of the bubble in 2011 ...




78. Post 2049621 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 06, 2013, 04:41:22 PM
@SlipperySlope:

You keep invoking the 2011 bubble, and how you expect a similar protracted slide downwards in this one as well. I'm not going to take the cheap shot and say "past performance is no guarantee of future results", in fact, I'm not even ruling out that you are right and that we have a correction of about 3 months ahead of us, bringing us all the way down to the 20-50 USD range, but there is one thing you seem to keep ignoring:

The smaller corrections (or capitulations) in 2011 followed a decidedly different pattern than those of the current bubble. What I drew in as "corrections" in 2011 and 2103 (see charts below) is to a degree debatable, but one trend seems to hold: the corrections of 2011 followed a very obvious, steady downward trend, each time reaching a lower high, and, more or less, going to lower lows with each correction.

The 2013 corrections so far however look quite different. True, we didn't reach a new ATH, but at the same time, the low points of the last two corrections are both higher than the lows of the first two corrections. If anything, I would say the corrections so far seem to indicate a (very cautious) consolidation pattern, trying to converge at a price somewhere between 100 and 130, while the 2011 pattern could perhaps be described as "reluctantly going downwards".

I appreciate your insights a lot, and I follow your posts closely, but I'm not buying your by-the-book comparison to the 2011 price decline, if the first month after this crash already looks so much different than the month after the crash two years ago.





Perhaps the comparisons with bubble 1 will become stronger as this collapse continues. There are plenty of falsifiable predictions I could make, and the most interesting is whether $145 or $160 will be surpassed during the remainder of the collapse. Based on bubble 1, I think not.
  



79. Post 2053374 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Given this stop at $106, could be a triangle developing centered on $108 ?



80. Post 2055766 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: notme on May 07, 2013, 12:04:54 AM
I love sitting on the sidelines with my bitcoins just watching the madness. The debating, the speculation, the sob stories and the cheers. So glad I'm not fighting the market right now.

That, dollar cost averaging, and automated market making are the only trading methods I recommend in this market.

Would you care to share your trading rules for automated market making?



81. Post 2055838 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: 100x on May 07, 2013, 01:43:30 AM
So I don't usually draw lines on a chart... but I am bored and it seemed like fun.



Alright, chart mystics, tell me the significance of this channel!  Smiley

The top trend line touches more times and thus has more significance when understanding the trend.



82. Post 2055930 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):



Interesting downtrend that could be a part of new multi-leg strike towards $80.



83. Post 2056029 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Volume picking up on this downtrend.

If anybody cares, I cancelled my highest outstanding bid at $95 and moved it to join another lower existing bid as part of a spread of bids should this downtrend indeed make a strike for $80. I now believe that a retracement from a retest of $80 might not get as high as the last one did.



84. Post 2056103 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Mt. Gox volume at 9000 BTC only 16 minutes into this hour. Goxlag now 57sec. Wall busting power downwards should it continue.

May pause at the $100 wall, if not before. If indeed this is a lengthy downward movement headed towards a retest of $80, then it will, in my judgement, be a multi-leg movement.



85. Post 2056153 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):



In case this latest down movement from $125 is indeed a part of a larger move towards $80, it is useful to consider what pattern might be revealed. The previous strike down is illustrated, and its pattern applied to the current trend.



86. Post 2060832 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Rampion on May 07, 2013, 02:41:42 PM
Man, the fact that everybody here is cheering every crash is such a bullish signal I'm about to go all in NOW (I don't think I will do it but I'm not joking anyhow)

I think that the large traders propelling these trends think of us here as sort of scalpers. We know the game, and they let us play.



87. Post 2061587 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 07, 2013, 03:54:20 PM

Thank you for all the coins. Rpietila has bought 2,500,000mBTC, left the trading desk, and will join the guests in his conference.

Speaking of oneself in the third person is a bad sign indeed, my friend Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Oh, forgot to add:
- I will always quote in minicoins (mBTC) from now on
- I don't think we see $0.1 ever again
- I can still write puts for $0.1, PM me
- If you want to know, how much I made and how, it will be a workshop case study in my conference

On your thread, or on a consumer-facing thread, I would be glad to adopt cheaper-sounding units of measure. But on the legacy threads of bitcoin speculation tradition here at bitcointalk, I for one, want the good old fashioned bitcoin, if for no other reason than to celebrate it.



88. Post 2062205 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):



This uptrend meets historical resistance near $112.



89. Post 2065749 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

An update on the battle to determine the rate of bubble collapse.




90. Post 2072043 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Trading range narrowing with the diminished volume.




91. Post 2073088 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):



I figure 194 bitcoins mined per hour at this rate. Interesting to compare that number with hourly trading volume - which was 1095 in the last complete hour at Mt. Gox.




92. Post 2073250 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Interesting watching the numerous 0.1337 sales nibble away at the available bids. I assume that it is a bot. I cannot figure a motive. Its not frequent enough to cause lag. It is not even handled - so I rule out an arb bot. Why not just buy from the large bid at the top of the depth in one lot.

Is it a signal among a team of traders? Does anyone do such a thing?



93. Post 2075293 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

The now known to be fake ask wall at $115 vanished just as trades approached it.



94. Post 2075775 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote
Well, bulls are still crapping their pants - look how nobody moved their bids up after the spike to $115.5 - plenty of bullchickens on the team green.

Although, it is a slightly upward trend with continued attacks on the resistance at $115.



95. Post 2077102 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

This pattern sets up a potential trend change. I sense a diminishing amount of buyers.




96. Post 2078996 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 08, 2013, 10:10:47 PM
Anyone care to make a Coinageddon countdown timer?


I made one based on this chart. http://i.imgur.com/puQbjNs.png


http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20130511T20&p0=37&msg=Bitcoin+post-crash+triangle+closing


I set it to 7PM GMT, not sure how accurate that's going to be. If someone can find out a more exact time that'd be great. It's surely gonna happen in the evening of the 11th. (If it doesnt break out prior to that)

+1



97. Post 2080778 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):



Looks like a definite change of trend. Give a few more hours to confirm direction. More volume on the downside would also be expected if this is a major move.



98. Post 2081053 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Was looking like a definite change in trend at the time we lost data.



99. Post 2086218 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):




100. Post 2086475 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: blackreplica on May 09, 2013, 01:30:39 PM
How cool is it that the bearish highs and bullish lows have converged on the one month anniversary of the big crash from 266?

Mere coincidence or divine forces at work? Cheesy

I believe that the ascending bullish lows represent the notion that the underlying long term trend is consistent with the January-March trend, e.g. doubling every 30 days. This notion is unsustainable.

I believe that the descending bearish highs represent the bubble collapse. Bubble theory says that typical bubbles give back all their speculative gains.

Perhaps one month from the April 10 peak at $266 is long enough for the predominant trader sentiment to shift to the fact that the waves of new buyers are diminishing, causing demand to likewise diminish, causing prices to likewise diminish.



101. Post 2090501 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Bitsinmyhead on May 09, 2013, 07:27:38 PM
Im going short here fully leveraged. This reminds me of the recent 140 high with no volume. Looking for 105ish to make me a nice 25% gain.

Are you by chance all in?





102. Post 2090763 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote
My guess is that there is a lot of people that got burned with the last bubble and now set up their bids and ask orders at very low and high values respectively. If only it would be a simple as that.

But maybe it is just as simple as that if you want just one or two very profitable trades from this bubble.



103. Post 2091406 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 09, 2013, 08:30:28 PM
I believe that the ascending bullish lows represent the notion that the underlying long term trend is consistent with the January-March trend, e.g. doubling every 30 days. This notion is unsustainable.

I believe that the descending bearish highs represent the bubble collapse. Bubble theory says that typical bubbles give back all their speculative gains.

Perhaps one month from the April 10 peak at $266 is long enough for the predominant trader sentiment to shift to the fact that the waves of new buyers are diminishing, causing demand to likewise diminish, causing prices to likewise diminish.


Sorry to dig up a slightly older post (posted earlier today, already 4 pages in o_O), but this is a pet peeve of mine:

No, the "January-March trend [...] doubling every 30 days" is not per se, as you say, "unsustainable". What you're doing there is repeating the worn-out mantra "exponential growth is not sustainable". Unless of course when it is, either in finance, or in nature[1].

What you probably should have said would have been something like: "a given exponential growth function, causally connected (however losely) to something of finite quantity, will eventually reach a point at which it drastically outgrows said finite quantity".

This is not just some empty semantic nitpicking. The difference in wording here amounts to the difference between lazy repetition of half-understood claims about the world, and a meaningful statement about the sustainability of growth.

Please note: I am not making any claims about the correctness of the January trendline. I just refuse to let a lazy statement like that slide by, that at face value claims that exponential growth is somehow an oddity, and its usage as a way to model reality ought to be rejected.

If you think that a particular exponential trend is not accurate, present your arguments (for fairness sake, in other threads you have been doing that. Sort of.). But the statement as it stands, in its unconditional form, is not fundamentally different from a perma-bull's battle cry "We'll inevitably reach 300k USD/btc next week". Both claims are devoid of information.

* * *

[1] A common rebuttal to the Apple case is "But now the price comes crashing down! So exponential growth is unsustainable after all". The fallacy here is of course that just because at a certain point exponential growth of a given magnitude must end, does not imply that up to that point the growth was not accurately described by a particular exponential function.

Respectfully, it is surprising to me that with your attention to semantics you missed the distinguishing point that I made.

Of course I take for granted that doubling of bitcoin price every 30 days is not something that can go on forever,

The market has already demonstrated that the January to March trendline was not sustainable - the crash from $266 fell right through it. One must have numerical blinders on not to recognize bitcoin prices cannot double every thirty days indefinitely.

Exponential bitcoin growth is happening now at perhaps 4-5x annually when measured according to the prominent lows of bitcoin prices at Mt.Gox 2011 to present.

What I actually said was that the notion is unsustainable. If bitcoin stops going up, then obviously the notion, i.e. belief that it will keep doublling upwards every 30 days,  becomes less prevalent - right?




104. Post 2091529 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Rockford on May 09, 2013, 09:18:24 PM
I am truly intrigued by the movement the last three days... and I was actually quite productive with my work  Smiley
I think if there are new people to the market they might enjoy this price "stability" and consider buying in if they were waiting for an entry point.
Bitcoin was especially scary the days before.

Did anyone read from Loaded? I have a feeling he might show up the next days...

Indeed his absence here is telling in itself.



105. Post 2091789 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: davincisolari on May 09, 2013, 09:37:32 PM
I'm really enjoying the price stability the past few days.  If it continues I do think it will be quite good for bitcoin adoption.  As the market is typically extremely volitile it does make me think that there are people who are creating the stability intentionally.  If so, keep up the good work.  Do others think this as well?

To me, the enthusiastic crowds of new bitcoin buyers are missing. Bargain-hunting buyers are more cautious about buying above these levels. Caution facilitates patience.

But should prices slowly slump, or perhaps simply not rise, then I believe there will be another leg down testing $80. In a collapsing bubble, price trend bias is downwards.



106. Post 2096652 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Here is the breakout to the upside.




107. Post 2096779 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Resistance expected near the previous peaks at $125 and $147.

The case for a continued bubble collapse strengthens if these previous peaks are not surpassed. Conversely it weakens if they are.




108. Post 2096824 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Does anyone else see even more weird bot behavior?

Alternating purchases and sales under 1 BTC.  An arb?



109. Post 2096883 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: ManBearPig on May 10, 2013, 09:46:14 AM
Resistance expected near the previous peaks at $125 and $147.

The case for a continued bubble collapse strengthens if these previous peaks are not surpassed.


Time frame? Day? Week? Don't pressure the poor Bitcoin, let him do his thing Smiley

Three months to inflate the bubble, should collapse in three also. Time frame is months to confirm the bubble collapse, but refutation can happen immediately, e.g. a spike to a new all time high.



110. Post 2096908 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: magicmexican on May 10, 2013, 09:47:37 AM
That wasnt even a rally, that was a huge sudden jump that got no support. I am afraid the bear-may still holds

I believe that the bear case still holds. I am curious however to see how a bearish pattern unfolds from this breakout.



111. Post 2098371 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

The breakthrough launched as it approached the rising support, with relatively moderate-high wall-busting volume.






112. Post 2098433 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Here is the next triangle.




113. Post 2098870 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: fitty on May 10, 2013, 01:44:52 PM
Does anyone else see the possibility of a reversal of the uptrend? It was stopped at $122. It took 15K BTC to bust walls and take asks on the way up. Could that hot money be forced to take profit quickly?

I don't think so. The bid wall has lagged a little since the push to $122. But $115-$120 is pretty solid.

$122 to $125 is 12k BTC. Unless some new money starts making up for lost time, we'll probably bounce around $118-$121 for a bit. We'll see some dumping for sure, but there's enough buying pressure to keep us above $115.

The ask wall doesn't seem to be getting out of the way at any point so far, it will be a lot of little jumps, regrouping, let the bids come forward then it's up again. If the rally continues it will be slower, that jump was 2 days of no action crammed into 3 hours.

If I was selling between $122-$130 right now, I'd be content to wait for the bulls to pay me off. I'd be surprised to see a lot of panic selling, we're more lilkey to pickup some bears to buy up any dumps. Any drop right now is a chance for someone to get back in.

I deleted that post soon after I made it, realizing that if the rally stopped at $122, then the most likely successor pattern is what you said. Thanks for the insight.



114. Post 2098945 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 10, 2013, 01:56:33 PM
i have started my dump

just did 200

Really? Or are you trolling. 14K BTC sold would greatly move the market.



115. Post 2099667 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

What do we make of this hour's sales - a pump and dump? Are the sellers now the same as the buyers six hours ago?



116. Post 2099928 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

I saw the 0.1337 bot in action with repeated buys. What is the motive?



117. Post 2101927 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: cedivad on May 10, 2013, 04:13:40 PM
Ok, i did market orders only today. I'm tired of trading this thing. (i was waiting for a re-entry point since when i sold everything at 110, i kicked myself not to have bought at 78$).
I bought at 122 and sold at 119. I bought again at 121 (5% of losses only for this move?).

Cashed out to a paper wallet, i don't want to see mtgox again for the next 2 months. I reached the 0.29% trading fees, they want me to get addicted. I have other things to do in the meanwhile, the only choose was between staying all in or all out.

Bitcoin conference, lot of positive media reviews, lot of buzz, 40k btc on buy orders from here to 100$, i don't think that this will be another 2011, but this confidence should tell me that maybe everything is out there to convince me to do the wrong choice.

We will see, bitcoin. 2 months from now, we will see.
This change of sentiment by one trader is entirely consistent with the steady drop in volume after the April 10 peak.



118. Post 2101984 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

If trading volume drops off for the remainder of the day, and volume over the weekend is relatively slow as we have come to expect, then the bid depth chart could fill in to form a narrow trading range, e.g. between $117 and $120 over the next 48 hours.




119. Post 2109592 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Note the expected low weekend volume.



120. Post 2109656 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: dexX7 on May 11, 2013, 12:28:04 PM
Bid Sum is almost at all times high. Last time this happened we went to 160.

Have we left the racy moves behind and are now turtley going up, or will some tiny positive news ignite a rocket?

But ask sum is higher than last time. Still I think, we will go up.



The bid sum is interesting. According to the chart, the sum rapidly declined from a similar high point during the drop from $145 down to $80.

It will take volume to consume the walls constituted by those bids. We are witnessing very low volume.



121. Post 2110643 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 11, 2013, 01:53:12 PM
My fiat is not on Gox, and odds are if we go over $125 I won't buy back in. If I can get cheap coin I will.

but i do agree with you over all. Once people see they can't get coins under 100 we might jump to test 160 again.

but then again, we might see 80 soon Smiley

But clearly there is lots of fiat on the order book, it's just in the "hoping for a crash" range.

It doesn't help that all the people waiting for a crash are posting the bubble is about to burst, crash is coming, sell your btc. They fail to mention if it did drop, they'd buy it back up faster then you can blink.

Shit I hope it crashes too. It's easy money. At the same time I'm not going to go around making charts trying to scare the fish.

If you have to scare the fish, you are doing it wrong. The fish should just be doing what you want without them being aware  Wink

Indeed, a bubble collapses because new buyers diminish. Most of the trades from here to the bottom of the bubble will be the iterative transfer from weak hands to stronger hands. Hands become weak as fewer successive buyers prop up prices.



122. Post 2120790 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: ManBearPig on May 12, 2013, 10:57:02 AM
As of close, yesterday:



Drop the blue trendline down a bit and we are still on it.

Subconsciously or otherwise, that line is in people's heads and is affecting their long-term plans.

The further the price drops from the blue trendline, the more that trader sentiment is drawn to the trendline of 2012 as the underlying trend. I will be looking for signs of that divergence widening in future versions of this well designed infographic chart.



123. Post 2120847 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Low volume, trending downwards from $122 with support through thin bids at $113.




124. Post 2122475 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Low volume may pick up as we have come to expect late Sunday.




125. Post 2128078 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: solex on May 13, 2013, 01:13:41 AM
Most people here are new and don't remember. Smiley

2011 was Crazy Awesome

the atmosphere on the forum as we slide down closer and closer to 1$ was ecstatic!



I wasn't there but I can just imagine how people were so happy and falling over themselves to buy shedloads of BTC at $5, $4, then $3, then whoohoo $2!


I was there. The reason that prices went so low was that bargain hunters bought back in too high. For example, I bought back in at $14. Postings the week of the 2011 bottom were looking for bitcoin to drop below $1 - which did not happen.



126. Post 2128104 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Dumbastronaut on May 13, 2013, 03:55:09 AM
Chartbuddy stop spamming

If you find the 3-D depth chart unhelpful, then simply ignore the Chartbuddy user - its a bot.



127. Post 2128198 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Low volume over the weekend has consolidated into a narrowing trading rage. Perhaps wall-busting volume will occur on Monday.




128. Post 2138123 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Bitcoin price rose from $114 to $118 with the arrival of modestly higher volume on Sunday evening. The rally is approaching resistance at $118-119 which has withstood several attempts in the past 12 hours.




129. Post 2143540 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Increased volume allowed the rally to more closely approach the ask walls at $120 and $125.




130. Post 2147589 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

I have Clark Moody's app set to 1 bitcoin audio trade sensitivity - its like a jackhammer!  donk-donk-donk-donk-donk-dink-donk.



131. Post 2147621 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on May 14, 2013, 08:02:49 PM


What is notable about this drop is how fast the ask walls are following the price downwards.



132. Post 2147662 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Remember that in November one could buy a bitcoin for $10. This downdraft will very likely not go that far.



133. Post 2147698 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

There is power to this downdraft.

Hourly volume is already 7000 BTC 10 minutes after the hour.



134. Post 2147745 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Wall busting volume.




135. Post 2147818 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: TheJuice on May 14, 2013, 08:18:32 PM
Clarkmoody has died on me

Mine too if it is any comfort. Bitcoinity still OK.



136. Post 2149853 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

The impulse downwards paused when it reached the illustrated support trendline, thus adding evidence for the support trendline's existence.

The interesting question is whether the strength of this downdraft will be renewed soon and bust down through the support. Trading sentiment will become more bearish if it does.




137. Post 2151494 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Will this downdraft be stopped by the support at $100? Remember that back in November, the price was $10.




138. Post 2156423 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

As this recent drop to $103 was entirely news-driven, I wonder if that after a brief consolidation, and lacking any other follow-on U.S. DHS seizure news, the gentle uptrend of 7 prior days will continue towards resistance near $120.









139. Post 2156530 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: cilphex on May 15, 2013, 02:58:43 PM
I was pondering like, as you do, what the continuation of higher lows would look like and I concluded that the obvious next data point would be a bounce off $100. Hey presto, yesterday happened.

It looks a little early though thanks to the weak hands selling the news so I think we'll see a double bottom in the next couple of days. Every day we hold above $100 into May is a point for the bulls I believe:



Linear not log as usual bear in mind.

This is the chart I've been waiting to see. To me, new highs aren't really that important, I mostly have been waiting to see the new bottom.  It's provided us with this third critical data point for growth rate, which gives us a better idea of bitcoin's trajectory.  I like what it shows.

I drew this chart with log prices and show a breakthough. But as the decline appears entirely news-event driven, I am thinking now that this could be a false breakout on my chart.

Given my hypothesis of a bubble collapse from April 10, this support trendline must be broken through to the downside by the end of June. Simply going sideways for that length of time would constitute a breakthough on the downside given the steepness of the support line.



140. Post 2161240 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Here is a mostly sideways trend bumping along mild resistance at $116. If surpassed, stronger resistance is at $120, and beyond that $125.




141. Post 2163659 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

The rally from $103 continues to bump along resistance, e.g. plentiful supply at $116.




142. Post 2170339 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote
I'm still not sure if anyone really knew what a supernode was...

Here is my take on a supernode ...

Imagine a network of precious metal dealers operating in every major city who now offer their hard-money customers a deflationary store of value - bitcoin.

A supernode is such a dealer who also operates a bitcoin network node that can independently mine bitcoins, with or without a pool.

The supernode network collectively fixes prices periodically with a long settlement period, routing orders among themselves and to other exchanges, e.g. Mt. Gox, Bitstamp.

The supernode network collectively takes other various measures to robustly operate in the face of DDoS, government constraints, etc.



143. Post 2170906 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

The sideways trend of the past two days has been steadily resisted at $116, while the trading range has narrowed.




144. Post 2179952 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

The sustained rally, having broken through the resistance at $116, is now facing resistance at $120 and beyond that $125.




145. Post 2179987 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: prof7bit on May 17, 2013, 12:32:13 PM
I'm a little confused by the above chart. I can clearly see sell orders for 3377 BTC between $118.00 and $118.99999 on Clark Moody but nothing shows up on your chart in that area.

What does it represent ?

Its a depth chart. Its the same data that clarkmoody would show if clarkmoody would work correctly. I would not rely on clarkmoody at all for trading, it is extremely buggy and shows orders where there are no orders anymore, sometimes you even see asks lower than the highest bid and bids higher than the lowest ask.

Clark Moody does a great job, however the Mt.Gox data feed has numerous problems that you describe. Chiefly the Mt.Gox data feed is not always consistent with regard to depth and trades.



146. Post 2181683 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 17, 2013, 01:47:47 PM
The sustained rally, having broken through the resistance at $116, is now facing resistance at $120 and beyond that $125.



I've said it in another thread, I'll say it again: I really appreciate your posts. Initially I suspected you're posting with a bit of a bearish agenda, but I was wrong: you let evidence guide your analysis, not wishful thinking.

btw, I'm not saying you're not bearish anymore, I suspect you still are, mid-term at least, but I respect your opinion a whole lot more than that of others because you genuinely seem to be interested in predicting shit, not in publishing post-hoc reasons for your trading decisions like most of us shlubs are Tongue

Thanks so much. My posts on this thread are mostly observations of current trends, highlighting the drama between support and resistance.



147. Post 2181946 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Note the steep bid and ask walls near the trading point. I wonder if volume will drop off this afternoon as we approach the weekend?






148. Post 2182151 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Interesting how big bids quickly follow the rallying price point - thus preventing a large spread.



149. Post 2182349 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

After the wall at $120 was consumed, the rally has paused at $122.




150. Post 2183042 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

The rally is now spiking upwards, and pausing at $125. The rally is about to make a new high for May after the low of $80.




151. Post 2183207 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: hmmmstrange on May 17, 2013, 05:59:35 PM
Can't wait until i get my sub $90 coins back. Should be soon!

Even if there is a trend reversal, the last drop to $80 took several days.



152. Post 2183265 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: rezurect on May 17, 2013, 06:02:59 PM
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/05/eff-will-accept-bitcoins-support-digital-liberty

Still hedging ...

Quote
With respect to Bitcoin as a technology, there is clearly a lot more to be said. Currently it seems that Bitcoin, while innovative, has a number of limitations and weaknesses in its design, and might yet turn out to be just the first draft for future crypto-currencies. However, as an organization that supports cryptographic experimentation, we believe the best answer to Bitcoin's potential shortcomings is for others to come along and offer superior alternatives.



153. Post 2183315 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

If it were not for the bitcoin conference this weekend, I would expect some sort of consolidation after the breakouts at $116 and the big one at $120.



154. Post 2185084 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

If the low weekend volume that we have come to expect is not affected by the bitcoin conference, then the support wall at $122 and the resistance at $125 may hold until volume picks up late Sunday.




155. Post 2185610 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Bid wall at $122 is being consumed. Volume modest.



156. Post 2185681 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Support bid wall at $120 has been removed in the face of this possible trend reversal.



157. Post 2248701 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

The rally broke through resistance at $123 and has paused near $127. Volume continues to be modest.




158. Post 2335220 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

This triangle I think illustrates the market's digestion of the money laundering news. As the May trend has been upwards, I suggest that this triangle will more likely be broken out to the upside, e.g. the support trend line will prove stronger.




159. Post 2347431 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

A May support trendline has been tested and held.




160. Post 2347527 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Supposing that the big sale was a shock and not a trend reversal, I expect that a triangle consolidation pattern will unfold on the 15-minute chart, perhaps with the apex at  $125.



161. Post 2401500 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Here is the short term downtrend after the recent peak at $136. The next bid walls are at $104-105.






162. Post 2402755 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: SGExodus on June 07, 2013, 03:42:41 PM
Anyone seeing a trend with these 5 am dumps?

ASICMiner selling... China time zone.

Interesting notion ...

During this transition to ASIC mining technology, one entity - ASICMiner - has a very large share of mined coins. Perhaps they have more motivation to sell than the multitude of individual GPU miners that have been effectively replaced.

Lots of slippage when the dump occurs. There are well known techniques to slice orders and time them for more efficient executions, e.g. wait for bids to fill back in.  Why don't dumpers use them?



163. Post 2405894 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Volume is tapering off as we have come to expect leading into the weekend. I've drawn support and resistance lines but the volatility today has cleared out the large bid and ask walls that would otherwise channel the price.




164. Post 2406598 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 10:44:59 PM
And of course if i show you one of this charts

http://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions
http://blockchain.info/charts/estimated-transaction-volume-usd

which are in total contradiction of the MASS adoption and people spending more and more bitcoins on different merchandise your gonna go in a denial phase.

Well , good luck with your bitcoin going from currency to commodity or .. collectibles.

I prefer another of the excellent blockchain.info charts. Excluding distortions such as Satoshi Dice, this one clearly illustrates the long term growth of the underlying bitcoin economy. The drawn support line indicates a growth rate of 10x every 14 months which approximately agrees with the corresponding long term support line for bitcoin prices.

The chart settings are log, smoothed and all data.




165. Post 2406721 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Using smoothed log data for the blockchain.info chart on USD transaction volume, it is harder to draw a support trendline.

My rough effort gives a an increase of 100x every 20 months. By including all transactions we include speculation on the exchanges as well as commercial transactions.




166. Post 2406833 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on June 07, 2013, 11:35:54 PM
People have this all backwards.  Its not merchants that we need - it's earners.  We need to PAY people in BTC.  That's how you drive an economy.  Give people something valuable, and merchants will flock follow the money.  If those with millions of BTC would start paying hoards of programmers in BTC only, they will need spend that income, and that will drive the economy.  

If you want to make a river, pour water on the mountain top.

I generally believe the bitcoin economy will unfold as Rick Falkvinge outlined back in 2011 ...

1. Unlawful trade - e.g. Silk road, criminal currency transfers.
2. International trade - wire transfers are too expensive, and credit cards are not accepted uniformly worldwide.
3. Merchant trade, e.g. credit card fees and fraud are too expensive.
4. Investment, e.g. like precious metals but no storage costs and supply is strictly limited.

It is shortsighted in my opinion, to focus on just one of these.

Risto Pietilä, who as a precious metals dealer frequented this forum a month ago, could make a great case for the last category. By the way, Risto I miss your commentary and wish you well.



167. Post 2406844 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 11:49:37 PM
clarkmoody down here , so, how important?

Works for me.



168. Post 2407667 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: favelle75 on June 08, 2013, 12:05:35 AM
Bought all back in at $112......wondering if I made a mistake.  Obviously missed the bottom, but was that just a false bottom?

Yeah, I bought back in 80% at $131. Holding 20% (or less as conditions indicate) as trend trading funds using Goomboo's moving average algorithm. The hourly chart trend is clearly downwards at the present.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60501.0



169. Post 2413583 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

The 10 day trend is downwards from $136, with sideways movement so far this weekend.




170. Post 2415711 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Abandon on June 08, 2013, 11:10:22 PM

https://www.tradingview.com/e/c5CZeJOb/ This is not investment or trading advice.

Thanks for annotating and commenting on your charts. With so many indicators present I like when you highlight how you interpret them.



171. Post 2418049 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

I am 100% back in fiat awaiting further collapse of the bubble.



172. Post 2418093 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: wopwop on June 09, 2013, 08:07:25 AM
I am 100% back in fiat awaiting further collapse of the bubble.
better not in mtgox they are going belly up

Well, with the high commissions Gox charges, its hard to see how they go out of business. At worst they sell the firm.



173. Post 2418121 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 09, 2013, 08:10:36 AM
I am 100% back in fiat awaiting further collapse of the bubble.
Interesting. If I may ask, around which price did you sell?

I bought back in at $131 after $125 was finally surpassed on the upside. I sold some back at $112 and then the rest at $99 in the past hour. My volume was large enough for slippage so I sliced it and waited for bids.




174. Post 2418168 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 09, 2013, 08:14:33 AM
I am 100% back in fiat awaiting further collapse of the bubble.

"Bitcoins are a store of value - hold them"  Grin

*applies only if you bought at 10$ or mined  Grin

The latter.



175. Post 2418179 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 09, 2013, 08:20:43 AM
This is an amazing drop.  Shocked

Yes, here in the USA hardly anyone knows about it.



176. Post 2418228 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Is anyone else noticing the relatively low lag at Mt. Gox? Smooth handling of the high volume so far.



177. Post 2434694 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

If this rally exceeds $130 it makes the case for a completed bubble collapse stronger. Conversely, if this rally reverses to a low below $88, it makes the case for a continued collapse of the bubble.

My own trading allocation is betting on the uptrend continuing per moving averages.




178. Post 2673666 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

I wonder if the rally over the past nine hours will surpass $71. If not, bearish.



179. Post 2681745 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Dalib on July 08, 2013, 12:43:15 PM
I think that if we stay above $ 74, the next bullish wave will be against the 80 wall.

When short-time overbought little drops.

Otherwise, we can probably fall back at  60 - 70 again ....




Good call so far. The price has fallen through $75 to rebound off $73.



180. Post 3577531 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

I see a steady drift downwards over the last four hours towards the resistance level near $390. Volume is higher at BTC China, so perhaps the sell off will continue for awhile.



181. Post 3577726 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: windjc on November 14, 2013, 07:07:42 AM
However, this just looks like another mild correction on the way up. I mean, we went up 70 points on Gox in less than 24 hours. There needed to be a correction.
I agree that this does not yet have the feel of a big correction, where bears sort of signal each other with consecutive sales, following an exhaustion of the buyers  at the peak.



182. Post 3716545 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

MtGox pulling china along at the moment testing $850.



183. Post 6079205 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on April 05, 2014, 05:04:35 AM
been a while since huobi lead stamp price wise Cheesy

On the 6-hour chart there are more green candles at HuoBi. Interesting. Everyone is wondering if the bottom is behind us.



184. Post 6150328 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Is China leading this move? Huobi is at 411.39 and Bitstamp at 425.



185. Post 6227524 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: magicmexican on April 15, 2014, 09:13:55 AM
Any source to see the current logarithmic trendline?

There are 3 trendlines that try to map the whole history:
- mine
- SlipperySlope's
- jl2012
(ofc nobody owns the numbers but we update them)

You mean some of these or some other?

Ye i mean some of these

Bitcoin logistic model for 1 million USD maximum price . . .

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArD8rjI3DD1WdFIzNDFMeEhVSzhwcEVXZDVzdVpGU2c



186. Post 6239583 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.38h):

Quote from: KFR on April 15, 2014, 11:19:11 PM
I know I've done this a couple of times now but I feel obliged to point out how much fun it (almost always) is to watch OKCoin's LTC 1m chart:

https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/okcoin/ltccny



Ah. The beauty of zero-fee trading and plenty of market making algorithmic bots to add liquidity. Some day a US based bitcoin exchange may get a clue.



187. Post 6291788 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

The upper resistance line goes all the way back to the November peak and that is the one with drama. The lower resistance line which has already been pierced, only goes back to April 16.




188. Post 8942547 (copy this link) (by SlipperySlope) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Short covering rally would be expected.