All posts made by Jacques_Bittard in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 11599437 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Quote from: empowering on June 12, 2015, 11:12:22 AM
My mum is more likely to adopt a monkey than Greece are to adopt BTC.

Increased usage I can imagine.... government official adoption so to speak.... is surely not even on the cards, no one really thinks it is ...right?

Actually, its very high chance for Greece to adopt bitcoin.
The government of Greece may be crooked, but they are not stupid! They can see how quickly and easily people became rich with bitcoin. They will surely want to become rich also, don't they?
Mark my words: Greece will adopt bitcoin in the coming years and will be the new kind of superpower, that gets it's power by it's immense riches.



2. Post 11631529 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

All the IDIOTS are pumping altcoins!!1
How can they be this STUPID and not know that only bitcoin will make them the richest people in the world?! They should BUY bitcoin and not be STUPID!! ALL THE ALTCOINS should be made illegal because they are SOOO compared to BITCOIN!!



3. Post 29709583 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: somac. on February 06, 2018, 09:53:57 AM
Give me a break, store of value, ha. Bitcoin is about getting the fuck out of a corrupt system that enriches the rich by taking from the poor. Bitcoin's value is an escape from that system and its injustice, end of story. If it happens to go up to an incredible $ amount, making it a store of value, so be it.

The system is fucked, throughout history it has always been fucked. Now, for the first time ever, the common people have an escape from that system. In 10 years time when current amount of bankers fiat has increased 5 million times, Bitcoin will be there. It will be priced high because not being in the system will be worth it.

Shit, your meant to be a legendary member. You should understand this.

Lol, bitcoin isn't an escape for the poor. The only escape for you would be to obtain a skill, that is special and needed enough, so people will pay you good money for your work. If you have done that, then you can educate yourself further on how to become an entrepreneur and how to use your knowledge to build a team, that can solve even more problems then you could solve alone.
This isn't easy, but you can't beat Darwin. The poor will stay poor mostly if they are only looking for easy shortcuts to riches. They don't want to learn anything or do anything, they just want to become rich. Some people do win the lottery etc. but the cold hard math tells you that the majority of the "lottery hoping folks" will remain poor till the end of their life.

For instance, if you would be educated, then you would see that Bitcoin isn't the savior of the poor. At first, bitcoin value is deflationary, meaning that owning money creates more wealth for you. If you had any basic sense of finance, then you would know that this actually helps the rich, not the poor. Currently it is easy to make money if you have money, but with bitcoin it is even easier. If the currency you are holding is inflationary, then you have to use your money  to start new projects and create new jobs, then your wealth also expands. If you do nothing but sit on your fat bank account, then your wealth will start to shrink. With bitcoin, the rich don't have to do anything but sit on their ass while watching their wealth to expand. And the poor, who don't have much to save up on their bank accounts and who work from salary to salary, won't get nearly as much benefit from this system.



4. Post 29711006 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 06, 2018, 10:40:11 AM
There are a lot of fucking retards out there, that are skeptical about entering into bitcoin.  This is as good as any entry point - around a 67% retracement, currently.

Yeah, sure we might get more retracement, but it is going to be difficult to go wrong from this entry point, whether BIG investor or a more modest one.

JayJuanGee being vulgar and angry, how about that. I've always thought that JayJuanGee is the type that cries in a warm bath during stressful situations. Considering the avatar picture and the lack of thought in the walls of text.



5. Post 29711527 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: somac. on February 06, 2018, 10:50:58 AM
Give me a break, store of value, ha. Bitcoin is about getting the fuck out of a corrupt system that enriches the rich by taking from the poor. Bitcoin's value is an escape from that system and its injustice, end of story. If it happens to go up to an incredible $ amount, making it a store of value, so be it.

The system is fucked, throughout history it has always been fucked. Now, for the first time ever, the common people have an escape from that system. In 10 years time when current amount of bankers fiat has increased 5 million times, Bitcoin will be there. It will be priced high because not being in the system will be worth it.

Shit, your meant to be a legendary member. You should understand this.

Lol, bitcoin isn't an escape for the poor. The only escape for you would be to obtain a skill, that is special and needed enough, so people will pay you good money for your work. If you have done that, then you can educate yourself further on how to become an entrepreneur and how to use your knowledge to build a team, that can solve even more problems then you could solve alone.
This isn't easy, but you can't beat Darwin. The poor will stay poor mostly if they are only looking for easy shortcuts to riches. They don't want to learn anything or do anything, they just want to become rich. Some people do win the lottery etc. but the cold hard math tells you that the majority of the "lottery hoping folks" will remain poor till the end of their life.

For instance, if you would be educated, then you would see that Bitcoin isn't the savior of the poor. At first, bitcoin value is deflationary, meaning that owning money creates more wealth for you. If you had any basic sense of finance, then you would know that this actually helps the rich, not the poor. Currently it is easy to make money if you have money, but with bitcoin it is even easier. If the currency you are holding is inflationary, then you have to use your money  to start new projects and create new jobs, then your wealth also expands. If you do nothing but sit on your fat bank account, then your wealth will start to shrink. With bitcoin, the rich don't have to do anything but sit on their ass while watching their wealth to expand. And the poor, who don't have much to save up on their bank accounts and who work from salary to salary, won't get nearly as much benefit from this system.

An escape for the poor doesn't mean they need to be rich dickhead. It means that the rich can no longer screw them financially by rigging the system. The amount of money one has is irrelevant, what is relevant is having a home, food, safety, equal opportunity, and most importantly not being abused by those who are meant to govern in their interest. Of course there will always be people who richer than others, and who gives a shit if the early adopters make a tonne of cash by sitting on their ass. These people being rich doesn't change what Bitcoin is.


Rigging the system like with mtgox and tether? Tongue I can see why you probably get abused by other people.



6. Post 29712411 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: somac. on February 06, 2018, 11:06:43 AM
Can't work out if you're a retard or just stupid. Where in the code does it mention Mtgox or Tether? where in the white paper are these things mentioned?

If bitcoin code would be the only important thing, then there wouldn't be so much whining here about the DOLLAR value of bitcoin  Grin



7. Post 29713550 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: Typex on February 06, 2018, 11:17:05 AM
It doesnt.  They were created by humanity and its greed.  There will never be a completely de-centralized payment system because of human nature.

There can be a completely de-centralized payment system in the future, when someone figures out on how to build an independent value stabilization mechanism. That crypto would become an actual currency, not a gimmick like bitcoin, that is dependent on fiat for valuation. Crypto can only beat central banks, if they do the same thing better then central banks. Meaning that they offer a currency with a predictable value and low service costs.

What can't be de-centralized, are people. There will always be people who are smarter then others and other people always centralize around them. This is not just human nature, but this is nature, that there are always strong that prevail and the weak that don't.  You can't force the world to be fair, because it just isn't. Some people are more capable then others and it is natural to reward them for that. Societies that have tried to to reward the weak and  suppress the strong (think communism) have only made a big mess.



8. Post 29724102 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

I didn't come here for the cheers of bitcoiners, but for the tears of bitcoiners! I have prayed to the altar of Karhu and I'm sure that it will soon reward me with gifts.



9. Post 29725518 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: zazzbg on February 06, 2018, 02:45:31 PM
How come you say "it's all over jump on the train to the moon" when you only got 2 hours of green candles and again going down?  Huh

This phenomenon is possibly caused by the principal need to share emotion. Bitcoiners feel deep personal pain for the past month, so they think that sharing this pain with others will numb it. They need to see others loose money to make their own losses feel more trivial.



10. Post 29726021 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.42h):

Quote from: TERA2 on February 06, 2018, 02:48:22 PM
How come you say "it's all over jump on the train to the moon" when you only got 2 hours of green candles and again going down?  Huh
Its the volume. That last bounce on increasing volume sealed the deal with this being a really high volume day and it cant go down without doing even more volume. Also right now the 1D chart looks like a hammer candle.

You analyze this market as if it were organic and well distributed. Let's see what Karhu has to say about that assumption.



11. Post 30884370 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on February 23, 2018, 07:54:08 AM
Bolded text is what I am indeed seeing in this whole crypto crazy world. People who had no idea about what a bitcoin is, suddenly become expert traders who can distinguish between a good and a bad crypto coin. I've seen people losing their savings to gamble on tokens, coins and ICOs.

I'm on the train but a part of me is feeling a bit(coin) train sick. And by the way, thanks for the energy consumption insights

The ugliest truth of bitcoin is that it just isn't useful in any legal fields. Sure it's useful in black markets, but this usefulness is a ticking time bomb before laws will end this. Greed is represented here by the notion that very little people actually seem to care about this. Everyone are solely concentrated on how much higher they want to sell their bitcoins and practical usefulness is rarely asked. Most know a lot about the price of bitcoin, in the same time knowing nothing about the value of bitcoin.

Promises of easy riches will always attract the worst among people. Those who are greedy enough to desire wealth, but who are lazy and stupid enough not to actually be able acquire it. These are the people who have strong desire for wealth, while knowing that they won't ever be able to achieve it in a productive way. They are the ones who are capable in selling their grandmother for bigger gains, because they know that they probably won't get many chances in life.
My guess is that this ugly phase of the crypto world will eventually end together with bitcoin. Total crash of bitcoin would finally disillusion people from finding easy shortcuts to riches here. Only those would remain who are able to work with this market more, then with a "buy low, sell high" routine. The rest will run off to new motivational classes and marketing schemes to find new shortcuts for easy riches.
I have faith in the cryptoasset market in general, but it has to mature quicker or else it will create a big mess.



12. Post 30885401 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: Ibian on February 23, 2018, 08:36:39 AM
Bolded text is what I am indeed seeing in this whole crypto crazy world. People who had no idea about what a bitcoin is, suddenly become expert traders who can distinguish between a good and a bad crypto coin. I've seen people losing their savings to gamble on tokens, coins and ICOs.

I'm on the train but a part of me is feeling a bit(coin) train sick. And by the way, thanks for the energy consumption insights

The ugliest truth of bitcoin is that it just isn't useful in any legal fields. Sure it's useful in black markets, but this usefulness is a ticking time bomb before laws will end this. Greed is represented here by the notion that very little people actually seem to care about this. Everyone are solely concentrated on how much higher they want to sell their bitcoins and practical usefulness is rarely asked. Most know a lot about the price of bitcoin, in the same time knowing nothing about the value of bitcoin.

Promises of easy riches will always attract the worst among people. Those who are greedy enough to desire wealth, but who are lazy and stupid enough not to actually be able acquire it. These are the people who have strong desire for wealth, while knowing that they won't ever be able to achieve it in a productive way. They are the ones who are capable in selling their grandmother for bigger gains, because they know that they probably won't get many chances in life.
My guess is that this ugly phase of the crypto world will eventually end together with bitcoin. Total crash of bitcoin would finally disillusion people from finding easy shortcuts to riches here. Only those would remain who are able to work with this market more, then with a "buy low, sell high" routine. The rest will run off to new motivational classes and marketing schemes to find new shortcuts for easy riches.
I have faith in the cryptoasset market in general, but it has to mature quicker or else it will create a big mess.
Looks like we have a communist.

I'm a pure blooded capitalist, but with things like ethics, conscience and a sober mind. Bitcoin has little to do with the idea of capitalism, where efficiency is an important pillar. One of the most important dreams of a typical bitcoiner is wealth re-distribution. They dream that bitcoin will eventually replace central banking, putting them into position of wealth and power, so they can sit on their ass for the rest of their life, while the deflationary value of their currency will even make them richer while they're doing the sitting. To me, this reminds me the illusions that the Bolsheviks had. Talking about vanquishing the evil rich, but only thinking about re-distribution of wealth from other pockets to own pockets. Without actually thinking about the practical issues involved in running a country and drowning in the illusions of personal worth instead. As you can see, I'm not even a fan of communists..



13. Post 30886166 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: Totscha on February 23, 2018, 08:40:37 AM
I agree it would be crazy to spend $5 billion / year to run a payment network used by 5 million users (that number is pretty low IMO). That's just wasteful. And if you think Bitcoin is just that, you've been reading some funny pamphlets.

It is in fact a decentralized peer 2 peer network that enables any 2 parties in the world to exchange value over the internet without the need for trust and a central authority.

Was email better than regular mail back in 1990? You needed a $5000 computer and it still took a long time, while a stamp only cost a few cents. What a waste of money, right?

In my eyes, the problem is exactly that bitcoin isn't nothing but an expensive payment network. It is often called a "cryptocurrency", but in my eyes it is a gimmick of an currency, when it doesn't have an independent mechanism for value stabilization. As long as it has to use fiat to give it value, then fiat will still be the only currency in the pair and bitcoin is just the temporal solution to transfer fiat. That is why, in my technical point of view, it is the same to hope for bitcoin to replace fiat then to hope for your car to fly to the moon. In this reality these things just don't have the needed mechanics for the job..
Don't take me as a pessimist by this. I think that in the future we will have an cryptoasset that is able to break this currency boundary and will be able to actually offer an predictable value without the need for the support of fiat value. Trying to wish bitcoin to do this isn't just constructive use of energy. All these false hopes and illusions will only make a big mess and the people who profit for it aren't exactly the good kind.
I also think that you can't compare the e-mail protocol to bitcoin protocol. One is a communication protocol, you can compare it to IRC if you like. Bitcoin is an financial protocol with a lot more complexities and different rule-sets.



14. Post 30886752 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: Ibian on February 23, 2018, 09:12:56 AM
General reminder that bitcoin would never have become more than a forgotten project worth about a basket of apples without the ability to make money on it. Greed is good.

Greed is productive in moderation. Too much of it and things mostly end bad.



15. Post 30887352 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: olumyd on February 23, 2018, 09:12:12 AM
The ugliest truth of bitcoin is that it just isn't useful in any legal fields.

What ? I... just... huh ?

Lol... don't go into a cardiac attack just yet... The guy's got a point, - 'legal'..., there are no current state or federal stamps on BTC codes acknowledging it as a medium of exchange, however, it does suit the masses to do as they please -  freedom of... something.

The main thing I pointed out with this is that bitcoin doesn't actually offer anything practical for doing business. It's not simple, secure, fast or cheap enough to be useful in practical finance. I think that the reason is that being the first, bitcoin is just the most simplistic, general and non-specialized product. New generation of cryptos are built from the ground up to solve specific practical problems and that is why they are a lot more efficient and useful.
Bitcoin was trying hard to define itself as a store of value asset. In my eyes this won't work because an asset, that's value is highly dependent on speculation, will never be a good store of value asset. This would be as moronic as to recommend pink sheets as store of value investments. Store of value needs stability and predictability the most.



16. Post 30887794 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on February 23, 2018, 09:32:08 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=521908
Really unimpressed with 2012 arguments then, not gonna be engaging them again now.
Thought we were at least up to 2013 now with 'privacy and fungibility' the topics.
Please Mr Dimon, Sir, won't you send us more entertaining shills? tia

Arguments ignored since 2012 = success?



17. Post 30887890 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: BobLawblaw on February 23, 2018, 09:36:06 AM
The main thing I pointed out with this is that bitcoin doesn't actually offer anything practical for doing business.

... and another one added to the ignore list. Jesus...

At first I read that he put Jesus on the ignore list..



18. Post 30888854 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: olumyd on February 23, 2018, 09:39:03 AM
I agree it is the first most simplistic, and it's quite hard for it to deviate from its original consensus plan - a store of value, peer-to-peer electronic cash system that has an in-built decentralised transaction history with high-tech-class security. Nothing more should be expected from it, other than for a scaling function to accommodate mainstream usage; because, I think that's the only thing the developers didn't factor in during the early development phase. But for stability and predictability only a centralised system can achieve such regulatory benchmark.

I think that the development of bitcoin shows genius in software development, but not so much genius in financial implementation. Bitcoin is innovative and complex in the software perspective, but it is childish and silly in financial perspective. Modern economy needs a lot more then bitcoin is able to offer as an practical tool.
The system will always be centralized around something. The software development of bitcoin is centralized around specific people, and the financial markets of bitcoin are centralized around specific organizations and people. As long as there are people, there will always be natural centralization of systems around people who can do things that most others can't. This is not something that should be fought by itself.



19. Post 30889468 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: Totscha on February 23, 2018, 09:46:03 AM
As long as you see it as just a payment network, or a financial protocol you will have trouble seeing it's true potential. It is a protocol that enables digital scarcity in a decentralized manner without the need for trust. It allows for hard promises. After a few blocks a transaction is effectively irreversible. So it has to be extremely expensive to 'overwrite history'. I mean overwhelmingly expensive. It's a feature, not a bug.

Will this scale to the entire population. Of course not! Nobody is saying it will not change and evolve. The current implementation is great for a settlement layer while the LN would be used as a payment network.

We have been running out of IPv4 addresses for the last 30+ years, but things still work. People have been hard at work and incrementally IP was able to handle more and more devices (Address Classes, Classless Inter-Domain Routing, NAT, ...). Wink

You praise the blockchain technology in general Smiley Bitcoin doesn't equal the blockchain technology. I see that the blockchain technology isn't dependent on bitcoin and bitcoin value isn't guaranteed by the blockchain technology.
I think that you are bringing forward first mover advantage with the e-mail comparison. That the e-mail protocols mostly remained the same and this will probably make bitcoin remain dominant also.
I think e-mail can't be compared because of the simple nature of the problem they were solving. You can't exactly re-invent something as simplistic as a wheel. This new field of cryptos or financial protocols are a lot more complex and can improved a lot by re-inventive improvement. We have seen radical development with new generation cryptos in terms of speed, costs and practical usability. When comparing software, then cryptos could be compared better to the development of operation systems and other systems as complex. Not vintage communication protocols Smiley



20. Post 30896378 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: Torque on February 23, 2018, 11:52:44 AM
In this reality these things just don't have the needed mechanics for the job..
Don't take me as a pessimist by this. I think that in the future we will have an cryptoasset that is able to break this currency boundary and will be able to actually offer an predictable value without the need for the support of fiat value.

And this so called future cryptoasset would look like what exactly, Mr. Genius?

Put up or shut up. Criticize or create.

All you fkn idiot trolls are the same. You come with heaps of smarmy handwaving and criticism, but offer zero solutions.

It would look like a crypto asset with a value stabilization mechanism? Smiley



21. Post 30913366 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on February 23, 2018, 03:46:59 PM
You praise the blockchain technology in general Smiley Bitcoin doesn't equal the blockchain technology. I see that the blockchain technology isn't dependent on bitcoin and bitcoin value isn't guaranteed by the blockchain technology.

This is a glaring fundamental error.  Blockchain, and what makes it truly revolutionary cannot be separated from the token.  In the case of Bitcoin we are talking about the premier token on the premier blockchain.  They are inseparable.  Blockchain is useless without bitcoin.  You cannot have one without the other without losing the goodness of the entire thing.

You will lose sober minded people with phrases like "premier blockchain" that only means something in ones personal reality.
I've had a lot of fun with the blockchain technology that isn't built on bitcoin tokens and I will continue to do so. But I think that right now, I'm about done here. My post is deleted, most of the people here have already ignored me and the rest are trying to dress their gibberish as technical argumentation. This is like trying to argue that the world is older then 6000 years in some radical Christian forum. Enjoy your echo chamber and the well deserved prize that comes with it in the future.



22. Post 30915019 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: bitserve on February 23, 2018, 04:37:21 PM
You praise the blockchain technology in general Smiley Bitcoin doesn't equal the blockchain technology. I see that the blockchain technology isn't dependent on bitcoin and bitcoin value isn't guaranteed by the blockchain technology.

This is a glaring fundamental error.  Blockchain, and what makes it truly revolutionary cannot be separated from the token.  In the case of Bitcoin we are talking about the premier token on the premier blockchain.  They are inseparable.  Blockchain is useless without bitcoin.  You cannot have one without the other without losing the goodness of the entire thing.

You will lose sober minded people with phrases like "premier blockchain" that only means something in ones personal reality.
I've had a lot of fun with the blockchain technology that isn't built on bitcoin tokens and I will continue to do so. But I think that right now, I'm about done here. My post is deleted, most of the people here have already ignored me and the rest are trying to dress their gibberish as technical argumentation. This is like trying to argue that the world is older then 6000 years in some radical Christian forum. Enjoy your echo chamber and the well deserved prize that comes with it in the future.

Hey r0ach, how much did you pay for this old newbie account? I guess not much but... You had to pay in BTC, didn't you? Your silver coins were not accepted as a valid payment I am sure. What a surprise for you, uh?

Perhaps whoever revived this old newbie account from the grave should change the signature. Right now it reads "Buy Bitcoin" Cheesy

If you read past posts (2015) the previous owner was a Bitcoin maximalist.

What's really funny is, that this account, was actually once created as an over-the-top parody of an typical bitcoin zealot. And even if it is totally over the top, it is still indistinguishable from an actual real bitcoiner  Grin



23. Post 30915299 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: flynn on February 23, 2018, 04:46:18 PM


What's really funny is, that this account, was actually once created as an over-the-top parody of an typical bitcoin zealot. And even if it is totally over the top, it is still indistinguishable from an actual real bitcoiner  Grin

"bittard" is french for "sex addict" ... is that on purpose ?

Nope, must have been an unconscious decision.



24. Post 30915737 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: bitserve on February 23, 2018, 04:46:59 PM
You praise the blockchain technology in general Smiley Bitcoin doesn't equal the blockchain technology. I see that the blockchain technology isn't dependent on bitcoin and bitcoin value isn't guaranteed by the blockchain technology.

This is a glaring fundamental error.  Blockchain, and what makes it truly revolutionary cannot be separated from the token.  In the case of Bitcoin we are talking about the premier token on the premier blockchain.  They are inseparable.  Blockchain is useless without bitcoin.  You cannot have one without the other without losing the goodness of the entire thing.

You will lose sober minded people with phrases like "premier blockchain" that only means something in ones personal reality.
I've had a lot of fun with the blockchain technology that isn't built on bitcoin tokens and I will continue to do so. But I think that right now, I'm about done here. My post is deleted, most of the people here have already ignored me and the rest are trying to dress their gibberish as technical argumentation. This is like trying to argue that the world is older then 6000 years in some radical Christian forum. Enjoy your echo chamber and the well deserved prize that comes with it in the future.

Hey r0ach, how much did you pay for this old newbie account? I guess not much but... You had to pay in BTC, didn't you? Your silver coins were not accepted as a valid payment I am sure. What a surprise for you, uh?

Perhaps whoever revived this old newbie account from the grave should change the signature. Right now it reads "Buy Bitcoin" Cheesy

If you read past posts (2015) the previous owner was a Bitcoin maximalist.

What's really funny is, that this account, was actually once created as an over-the-top parody of an typical bitcoin zealot. And even if it is totally over the top, it is still indistinguishable from an actual real bitcoiner  Grin

So it is basically a trolling account that dates back since, at least, 2015... when the price was what? $150-$250? And you suppossedly decide to revive it now, when price is what? over $10000?

Good job, dude. You are smart.

I've actually got about 10x gain with bitcoin in 2013 Q3. This was the last period that I held bitcoin longer then an hour. After that I don't see bitcoin risk/gain ratio as beneficial enough. From that time I have earned a lot more then I did with bitcoin mainly with XRP, ETH and lately also EOS. For me, bitcoin is for bartenders and cab drivers who react on technical developments with a several year delay.



25. Post 30917651 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: thisisntbic on February 23, 2018, 05:05:38 PM
Bitcoin being accepted as legal currency in Japan and South Korea aren't... legal? Or do you mean, you can't pay most lawyers with btc? Actually, I'm sure you could probably pay off a judge/politician easier with bitcoin than cash haha.

Sure, you can use bitcoin as an currency, this wasn't my point. My point was on why would you use bitcoin in your business if it just doesn't have any advantages over other payment solutions?


Quote from: thisisntbic on February 23, 2018, 05:05:38 PM
What are the technical developments of XRP, ETH, and EOS that surpass Bitcoin? It would be nice to know now, rather than a year from now.

The main thing that XRP, ETH and EOS have that bitcoin doesn't is potential. Both their initial concept and software framework are more complex, specialized and have a lot more room for development. The development of bitcoin is stuck in it's own tight little room of dogmas, that repeat unchanged in these echo chambers for years. With bitcoin, the eventual failure is certain for me - not the mater of "if", but "when". Luckily I still can be uncertain with those other three, and I'm constantly on the prowl for new competent teams that have potential ideas for new crypto applications.



26. Post 31028566 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.45h):

Quote from: mindrust on February 25, 2018, 09:52:33 AM
This is why GPU/CPU mining is a lot better than ASICs i think.

GPU companies have to build&sell GPUs no matter what because gamers need to game. CPU manufacturers have to build&sell CPUs no matter what because there will be a demand whether people mine crypto or not. Nvidia/AMD/Intel will be making hardware no matter what. They can't be deceived by evil crypto criminals.

But ASICs? This is cancer.

There is no way Nvidia/Intel build HW and mine Bitcoin without getting noticed but Bitmain can. Because that's their only job. Nvidia and the others can't run a 2 businesses at once. They are making GPU/CPU's and we are exploiting their business. Good for us.

Maybe Cobra is right. Better late than ever.

Exactly! Bitcoins mining has been idiotic since the coming of ASICs. An industry created to solve a problem that doesn't even have to exist. Billions wasted for nothing, just to follow this blind greed. With PoW, CPU mining would be the best. Access to CPU processing power is most widespread and CPUs can be utilized to a lot more tasks then just so solve one task. This would be A LOT more energy efficient and less costly to the users of the network. But because the bitcoin community is mostly one big echo chamber, this hasn't been exactly discussed.
Now, even if bitcoin would switch to CPU mining and improve by this, then it would still be the inferior technology to newer PoS models that are being developed.
The religious people of the bitcoin community are dragging down the development by setting up stupid dogmas, that wont let constructive criticism through. The rest are growing around this new idea of cryptoassets, while the bitcoin community is sitting on their dated whitepaper and singing hallelujah..



27. Post 31794833 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: Dakustaking76 on March 07, 2018, 04:50:52 PM
I think that bitcoin is done...

I am still a holder Ofcourse But this is not a good sign at Well....

Bitcoin has walked on thin ice for a long time already.
Bitcoin is a payment network with 5 million users and annual costs with around 5 billion $ just for the electricity and hardware (leaving out indirect service costs). That makes annual cost around 1000$ per bitcoin user a year. These costs are mostly paid by debt and high hopes of future value. When hope of irrational gains will start to crack, then the faith of debtors will start to crumble together with holders hope of bitcoins high future value. This will eventually create an avalanche that the world of finance hasn't seen yet. It's not a matter of "if", but "when".



28. Post 31795827 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: vortex1878 on March 07, 2018, 05:22:14 PM
Where is the Binance hack rumour coming from? Any source?

A bot popular at binance got hacked and bought someones viacoins with an astronomical price. Binance itself is safe. BTC market is just so thin and weak that it will jump on every scare.



29. Post 31889265 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: Torque on March 09, 2018, 02:50:50 AM
Hey ya'll shitcoin holders? Can't you see that your garbage is directly tied to the Bitcoin spot price?

It's. Not. Going. Anywhere. Without. Bitcoin. Like. Ever.

Deal with it.

Bitcoin has always been the biggest shitcoin to what the weaker shitcoins follow.



30. Post 31891048 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Trading cryptos is as addictive as gambling.  When I break my rule of not trading on bear markets, then I get burned. During the rule of Karhu, one must be humble and without greed. Karhu will bless those who will stay in fiat and keep out of crypto during these times. Predictability is too low and the odds unfavorable for success.
There are rumors that 'Binance hack' was just a diversion. Something that sounded alarming enough to justify the selling volume, and something that was weak enough for regular Joes to keep up their bids to catch the "panic sellers".
Usually, during bull markets the weekdays are good and the weekends are bad. During bear markets, it's usually the opposite. So, there is a good chance that the price will recover a little in the next couple of days, but it still is a risky gamble, because bear markets have the tendency steer in the direction that will be surprising to the majority.

The main thing that gives bitcoin value is belief. Belief has to pay for about 5 billion dollars per year for electricity and hardware to run a payment network with 5 million users. That is a lot of weight on belief and belief can only do so much. Unnecessarily expensive and outdated systems like BTC PoW mining are dragging this market down.



31. Post 31901776 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

I think that there will be 12-24 months of slow bleed, that will have these little sharp upward spikes that the sheep will repeatedly call  "reversals".
This is how you get the sheep excited enough to stay in the market while you do the shearing. History will repeat itself.



32. Post 31902156 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: bitebits on March 09, 2018, 08:21:03 AM
The main thing that gives bitcoin value is belief. Belief has to pay for about 5 billion dollars per year for electricity and hardware to run a payment network with 5 million users. That is a lot of weight on belief and belief can only do so much. Unnecessarily expensive and outdated systems like BTC PoW mining are dragging this market down.

I have been hearing this argument since < 0.5 billion dollars per year for electricity and hardware. Both 0.5 and 5.0 billion dollars are a drop in the ocean in the grand scheme of things.
I wish I could run a business as competitive and efficient as the bitcoin mining.

The grand scheme of things is that it costs around 1000$ per year for a single bitcoin network user just to maintain the hardware side of this payment network. Only way for the value of coin to remain or rise is to get some greater fools to pay for this. But greater fools are an abundant resource, so this is just a ticking time bomb when BTC will collapse on it's own weight. Just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean that it won't happen.



33. Post 31903233 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.47h):

Quote from: realr0ach on March 09, 2018, 08:37:04 AM
The main thing that gives bitcoin value is belief. Belief has to pay for about 5 billion dollars per year for electricity and hardware to run a payment network with 5 million users. That is a lot of weight on belief and belief can only do so much.

That's probably a completely bogus number of users.  When the price was $1000, people were saying there were 200k users, and even then most of those people didn't actually use bitcoin for anything; buy off-chain coins from an exchange, leave coins on exchange, then pray price goes up.  I don't consider fly by night speculators who may not even of had to do an on-chain transaction as users, just like someone who owns Netflix stock isn't necessarily a Netflix user.

I agree that this number is probably a very optimistic one. There is practically 0 use for BTC in legal commerce. Utility is in illegal commerce or speculation. It is probable that everyone are considered a user who has purchased weed from tor, or who has purchased 50$ worth of BTC after reading an article. And even with this optimistic number, the 1000$ per user anual cost is insane.
In the future, people will be like "wtf, how couldn't you see that one coming?"..But greed has made people blind in the past, and it will continue to do so in the future.



34. Post 32146350 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

I think that the next couple of weeks will be amazing! (for me at least)  Grin



35. Post 32280902 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Is there anyone else, who comes here just to see the hardcore bitcoiners being mad at the world for not buying their virtual units? Am I the only one? Is there something wrong with me that I enjoy observing entitled people not getting what they want? So many self-aware questions rise in this place.



36. Post 32289873 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: BitcoinBunny on March 14, 2018, 10:37:14 AM
Is there anyone else, who comes here just to see the hardcore bitcoiners being mad at the world for not buying their virtual units? Am I the only one? Is there something wrong with me that I enjoy observing entitled people not getting what they want? So many self-aware questions rise in this place.

No you are pretty much one of the very few poisonous imbeciles with poisonous trolling posts around who feels the need to piss on other people's parades.
Congratulations.

Yes I would say there is something very wrong with you.

Hopefully you will GTFO.

Maybe you can troll a banking interest forum where people are having orgasms at making 2% per year profit on their savings instead.

Reading how upset you are, made me both happy and ashamed for feeling happy. I know that it is wrong to feel joy on others pain, but it just feels so right when dreams of gaining wealth without work or skills get broken. The tears of the millenials taste the best. Seeing them cry that other people won't just make them rich is one of the best shows there can be. Only things missing would be long youtube rants on how the rest of the world is to blame that the poor millenial didn't get rich by sitting on his ass. That would rock even more!



37. Post 32290428 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 14, 2018, 12:07:08 PM
Is there anyone else, who comes here just to see the hardcore bitcoiners being mad at the world for not buying their virtual units? Am I the only one? Is there something wrong with me that I enjoy observing entitled people not getting what they want? So many self-aware questions rise in this place.

No you are pretty much one of the very few poisonous imbeciles with poisonous trolling posts around who feels the need to piss on other people's parades.
Congratulations.

Yes I would say there is something very wrong with you.

Hopefully you will GTFO.

Maybe you can troll a banking interest forum where people are having orgasms at making 2% per year profit on their savings instead.

Actually, almost all of the fucktard bearshills come into this thread and act like they have some kind of meaningful and unique insightful perspective into bitcoin price dynamics..

but they are proven to be retards, over and over and over..  For some reasons (I wonder why?) they want to trick you out of your bitcoins.

After they fuck up then they kind of disappear when they do not have anything to latch onto in their pie in the sky bitcoin death fantasies.


Surely this Jacques_Bittard troll shit shill job would have been with Tera beara calling the end of bitcoin (and further and more painful price corrections) during the March 2017 down to $890 - and that surely would not have been a good time to sell any decent amount of your bitcoins.

You are using a lot of profanity. You were a lot softer a couple of years ago. Before your avatar picture I actually thought that you are a girl and thought on hitting on you. So, what happened in the meantime? Hit puberty and testosterone is finally doing it's thing or something?

I have never called the time for the end of bitcoin. Bitcoin will end when the governments will finally crack down on exchanges creating funny-money to pump bitcoin. As long as people ignore things like goxdollars or tether,  then there is no height high enough. One thing is certain though - the governments will crack down on fake money exchanges and greater fools will also run out eventually. Then I'd like to see the bitcoin fanatics pay for the 7billion dollar revenue to the miners, just to sustain the network. So, I have no idea when will bitcoin crash, but I know that it will crash, and it will do it with a lot of tears from people who mostly deserve whats coming.



38. Post 32292964 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: Farmer Bill on March 14, 2018, 01:14:49 PM
Is there anyone else, who comes here just to see the hardcore bitcoiners being mad at the world for not buying their virtual units? Am I the only one? Is there something wrong with me that I enjoy observing entitled people not getting what they want? So many self-aware questions rise in this place.

No you are pretty much one of the very few poisonous imbeciles with poisonous trolling posts around who feels the need to piss on other people's parades.
Congratulations.

Yes I would say there is something very wrong with you.

Hopefully you will GTFO.

Maybe you can troll a banking interest forum where people are having orgasms at making 2% per year profit on their savings instead.

Actually, almost all of the fucktard bearshills come into this thread and act like they have some kind of meaningful and unique insightful perspective into bitcoin price dynamics..

but they are proven to be retards, over and over and over..  For some reasons (I wonder why?) they want to trick you out of your bitcoins.

After they fuck up then they kind of disappear when they do not have anything to latch onto in their pie in the sky bitcoin death fantasies.


Surely this Jacques_Bittard troll shit shill job would have been with Tera beara calling the end of bitcoin (and further and more painful price corrections) during the March 2017 down to $890 - and that surely would not have been a good time to sell any decent amount of your bitcoins.

You are using a lot of profanity. You were a lot softer a couple of years ago. Before your avatar picture I actually thought that you are a girl and thought on hitting on you. So, what happened in the meantime? Hit puberty and testosterone is finally doing it's thing or something?

I have never called the time for the end of bitcoin. Bitcoin will end when the governments will finally crack down on exchanges creating funny-money to pump bitcoin. As long as people ignore things like goxdollars or tether,  then there is no height high enough. One thing is certain though - the governments will crack down on fake money exchanges and greater fools will also run out eventually. Then I'd like to see the bitcoin fanatics pay for the 7billion dollar revenue to the miners, just to sustain the network. So, I have no idea when will bitcoin crash, but I know that it will crash, and it will do it with a lot of tears from people who mostly deserve whats coming.

your posts remind me a lot of a guy called falling who hung round here on the way down from $500 to $160 are you he?

Don't know, could be. I usually surface here when the probability to witness bitcoiner tears is high, so timing would fit.



39. Post 32295657 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: Phil_S on March 14, 2018, 01:38:49 PM
I usually surface here when the probability to witness bitcoiner tears is high, so timing would fit.

So... you're leaving soon?  Grin

I hope so. If I could choose between more money and the tears of bitcoiners, then almost always I would choose more money.



40. Post 32299507 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: Torque on March 14, 2018, 01:56:35 PM
I see that Jean-Claude Fucktard is back. Good thing I have him on /ignore.

I apologize that I have upset you and will probably continue to do so.



41. Post 32303384 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: Anon136 on March 14, 2018, 02:57:06 PM
blah

Why would you talk to someone who just stated that he has you on ignore? Are you missing a few brain cells?

Why would you talk to someone who is supposedly on ignore?



42. Post 32304113 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Quote from: bitserve on March 14, 2018, 03:02:05 PM
blah

Why would you talk to someone who just stated that he has you on ignore? Are you missing a few brain cells?

C'on, the guy is retarded... but not for that. Everybody knows people tend to peek (sometimes at least) on their ignored list plus he is replying to a direct "public mention". Right to reply and all that shit Smiley



Thank you for common sense and I understand if you the needed to insult me to fit in.



43. Post 32325757 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Hard to understand why people aren't asking the most important question here.. is JayJuanGee a real male ballerina or not?



44. Post 32328679 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

I think that bitcoiners deserve their days of mediocre happiness now. Maybe until the end of the weekend..?



45. Post 32600378 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.48h):

Alts rise higher and drop quicker. It's always been like that and it is the reason why it's more reasonable to buy alts during bull markets.
The only smart move here is done by those who sold in December and who won't touch this market for a long time.



46. Post 32804235 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

I think that we'll have a nice weekday dump today, as expected during bear markets.



47. Post 32804429 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: mymenace on March 21, 2018, 06:14:33 AM
I know an investment adviser with 500 clients.  I am the only person he knows that holds crypto.

I asked my investment advisor in 2011 if I should invest in Bitcoin. He just laughed (after I explained what it was). He was like...."you Ron Paul guys...".

My Auditor for my government regulated investment fund advised me 3 years ago and every year since to invest in other options besides crypto.

I just keep laughing

He has suggested the fund runs at a high risk and should be under further review, yet I have x10 on my initial investment



There are also lottery winners with x100000000 on their initial investment. What fools everyone are on not buying up the lottery.



48. Post 32810408 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

The level of financial advisory in this thread is overwhelming



49. Post 32833344 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: RedBloodWhiteBones on March 21, 2018, 01:48:47 PM
Is this worrying to any of you veterans?

http://fortune.com/2018/03/20/bitcoin-price-blockchain-child-porn-ban-crime/

I'm usually able to shrug off MSM bitcoin FUD but this makes me nervous.

I don't think that government regulations will pose a real threat anytime soon. They know for years already, that bitcoin is mostly used for illegal activities like drugs and child porn, but they aren't doing anything about it. They're possible the same people, who profit most from all this money laundering and the creation of a make-believe industry, that adds value to their fiat money. If they really wanted to stop this, then all of this would be worthless in a month.



50. Post 32834025 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

I expect to see some tears in 2h



51. Post 32838553 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: ssmc2 on March 21, 2018, 02:55:41 PM
Speaking of yourself?

I'm not shilling nonsense about coming of global currency.

Quote
"It's slow and it's costly, but as more and more people have it, those things go away. There are newer technologies that build off of blockchain and make it more approachable," Dorsey said in the report.

Bitcoin is able to do 14 transfers per second and it's mining costs over 1000$ per user a year. How the heck is more people having it going to fix this?!
At the end even he confesses that there are newer and better cryptos then bitcoin, somehow forgetting that he was shilling on bitcoin becoming the global currency. This guy doesn't know the heck he is talking about and is possibly having some kind of a mental breakdown.



52. Post 32840538 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: MoonIsBlue on March 21, 2018, 03:24:54 PM
I should probably also point out that the the electricity consumption debate on BTC is being magnified by the media. The data centers of the olympics consume way more than Bitcoin does, but ofcourse we don't pay any attention to that. If you hear the media talking about electricity consumption try for yourself to atleast get a frame of reference on what such consumption means. They're just comparing it to countries but what about certain data centers and payment solutions? How does it compare to those? How does it compare to an industrial complex? Those are the things you don't hear. Everyone is just salty for not buying BTC for pennies (  Grin )  

This is a popular form of whataboutism, that I have heard here before. People trying to justify the costly nature of bitcoin by comparing it to the incomparable. Just like you did here, by comparing the worlds nr1 athletic event with 3,6billion viewers to a speculative digital asset and with maximum 5 million active users.
The costs of running the bitcoin blockchain should be compared to the comparable - meaning to the costs of other blockchains!






53. Post 32841264 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: fluidjax on March 21, 2018, 03:38:39 PM
I should probably also point out that the the electricity consumption debate on BTC is being magnified by the media. The data centers of the olympics consume way more than Bitcoin does, but ofcourse we don't pay any attention to that. If you hear the media talking about electricity consumption try for yourself to atleast get a frame of reference on what such consumption means. They're just comparing it to countries but what about certain data centers and payment solutions? How does it compare to those? How does it compare to an industrial complex? Those are the things you don't hear. Everyone is just salty for not buying BTC for pennies (  Grin )  

This is a popular form of whataboutism, that I have heard here before. People trying to justify the costly nature of bitcoin by comparing it to the incomparable. Just like you did here, by comparing the worlds nr1 athletic event with 3,6billion viewers to a speculative digital asset and with maximum 5 million active users.
The costs of running the bitcoin blockchain should be compared to the comparable - meaning to the costs of other blockchains!

No other blockchain is comparable to Bitcoin, because no other blockchain is decentralized, and in the end, that's all that really matters.


At first, bitcoin blockchain is centralized around pools. 3 pools are enough for a 51% attack. That makes bitcoin as centralized as most and more centralized then some.
Second, centralization will only matter to low educated millennials, who are dumb enough to actually believe the "bitcoin vs fiat" sales pitch BS narrative. In the real world of fiance and economy, what counts is efficiency, not fantasy.



54. Post 32841937 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: bitcoinPsycho on March 21, 2018, 03:50:29 PM
I should probably also point out that the the electricity consumption debate on BTC is being magnified by the media. The data centers of the olympics consume way more than Bitcoin does, but ofcourse we don't pay any attention to that. If you hear the media talking about electricity consumption try for yourself to atleast get a frame of reference on what such consumption means. They're just comparing it to countries but what about certain data centers and payment solutions? How does it compare to those? How does it compare to an industrial complex? Those are the things you don't hear. Everyone is just salty for not buying BTC for pennies (  Grin )  

This is a popular form of whataboutism, that I have heard here before. People trying to justify the costly nature of bitcoin by comparing it to the incomparable. Just like you did here, by comparing the worlds nr1 athletic event with 3,6billion viewers to a speculative digital asset and with maximum 5 million active users.
The costs of running the bitcoin blockchain should be compared to the comparable - meaning to the costs of other blockchains!

No other blockchain is comparable to Bitcoin, because no other blockchain is decentralized, and in the end, that's all that really matters.


At first, bitcoin blockchain is centralized around pools. 3 pools are enough for a 51% attack. That makes bitcoin as centralized as most and more centralized then some.
Second, centralization will only matter to low educated millennials, who are dumb enough to actually believe the "bitcoin vs fiat" sales pitch BS narrative. In the real world of fiance and economy, what counts is efficiency, not fantasy.
If you hate bitcoin so much why are you here?

I'm here for the tears of bitcoiners and sometimes some rainmaking is needed. Also, the sentiment here can also be a good indicator to help with my crypto gambling habbits.



55. Post 32842966 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: bitcoinPsycho on March 21, 2018, 03:59:09 PM
I should probably also point out that the the electricity consumption debate on BTC is being magnified by the media. The data centers of the olympics consume way more than Bitcoin does, but ofcourse we don't pay any attention to that. If you hear the media talking about electricity consumption try for yourself to atleast get a frame of reference on what such consumption means. They're just comparing it to countries but what about certain data centers and payment solutions? How does it compare to those? How does it compare to an industrial complex? Those are the things you don't hear. Everyone is just salty for not buying BTC for pennies (  Grin )  

This is a popular form of whataboutism, that I have heard here before. People trying to justify the costly nature of bitcoin by comparing it to the incomparable. Just like you did here, by comparing the worlds nr1 athletic event with 3,6billion viewers to a speculative digital asset and with maximum 5 million active users.
The costs of running the bitcoin blockchain should be compared to the comparable - meaning to the costs of other blockchains!

No other blockchain is comparable to Bitcoin, because no other blockchain is decentralized, and in the end, that's all that really matters.


At first, bitcoin blockchain is centralized around pools. 3 pools are enough for a 51% attack. That makes bitcoin as centralized as most and more centralized then some.
Second, centralization will only matter to low educated millennials, who are dumb enough to actually believe the "bitcoin vs fiat" sales pitch BS narrative. In the real world of fiance and economy, what counts is efficiency, not fantasy.
If you hate bitcoin so much why are you here?

I'm here for the tears of bitcoiners and sometimes some rainmaking is needed. Also, the sentiment here can also be a good indicator to help with my crypto gambling habbits.
Oh .. I cry every day at the stupendous 1000s of percent gains from bitcoin and how glad I never dumped my coins when dickheads like you dumped there's at 10 cents and forever bitter(tard)

I dumped my bitcoin at 2013 Dec for little over 1000$. Got a small 10x gain from that play. Lost any vision of potential with bitcoin then and ETH, XRP and EOS served me a lot better for later years. Now dumped everything again in 2017 Dec, as it was like a repeat of 2013 Dec and wasn't hard to miss. Now my cryptogambling wealth is in fiat, waiting for more tears of bitcoiners to flow before I enter again towards more potential paths.
So, you still think I feel bitter?



56. Post 32844647 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: Sitarow on March 21, 2018, 04:25:32 PM
I should probably also point out that the the electricity consumption debate on BTC is being magnified by the media. The data centers of the olympics consume way more than Bitcoin does, but ofcourse we don't pay any attention to that. If you hear the media talking about electricity consumption try for yourself to atleast get a frame of reference on what such consumption means. They're just comparing it to countries but what about certain data centers and payment solutions? How does it compare to those? How does it compare to an industrial complex? Those are the things you don't hear. Everyone is just salty for not buying BTC for pennies (  Grin )  

This is a popular form of whataboutism, that I have heard here before. People trying to justify the costly nature of bitcoin by comparing it to the incomparable. Just like you did here, by comparing the worlds nr1 athletic event with 3,6billion viewers to a speculative digital asset and with maximum 5 million active users.
The costs of running the bitcoin blockchain should be compared to the comparable - meaning to the costs of other blockchains!

No other blockchain is comparable to Bitcoin, because no other blockchain is decentralized, and in the end, that's all that really matters.


At first, bitcoin blockchain is centralized around pools. 3 pools are enough for a 51% attack. That makes bitcoin as centralized as most and more centralized then some.
Second, centralization will only matter to low educated millennials, who are dumb enough to actually believe the "bitcoin vs fiat" sales pitch BS narrative. In the real world of fiance and economy, what counts is efficiency, not fantasy.

3 Pools that  can quickly be abandoned by miners for other pools.

Takes moments to do.

In all honesty, I myself have always considered a 51% attack on any PoW or PoS coin a very low key threat. I was just replaying to the previous poster on why bitcoin isn't special in decentralization.



57. Post 32848304 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: BlackSpidy on March 21, 2018, 05:08:19 PM
*collects tears when everyone are busy crying*

Yup, that's my preferred method of collecting tears and Bitcoin. Lovely way to do it.

If you are collecting bitcoins now, then I'm afraid that you might be a little too quick on your feet. I came here today because I sensed a cloud of tears and I don't see any light to blissful happiness yet.



58. Post 32849731 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 21, 2018, 05:28:06 PM
Is this worrying to any of you veterans?

http://fortune.com/2018/03/20/bitcoin-price-blockchain-child-porn-ban-crime/

I'm usually able to shrug off MSM bitcoin FUD but this makes me nervous.

I don't think that government regulations will pose a real threat anytime soon. They know for years already, that bitcoin is mostly used for illegal activities like drugs and child porn, but they aren't doing anything about it. They're possible the same people, who profit most from all this money laundering and the creation of a make-believe industry, that adds value to their fiat money. If they really wanted to stop this, then all of this would be worthless in a month.

And how would they accomplish making "all of this" worthless in a month?   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Simple. Strict law and strong law enforcement. If you think that the courts and the police will side with a handful of people who wanted quick and easy riches, then think again. It is not a hard to prove fact that bitcoin is widely used currency in illegal markets and would be easily justifiable to apply low tolerance.
But as I said, no need to worry on that. The crooks in charge are perfectly fine with cryptos. This inflated industry is actually giving value support to fiat and this is why they are rather interested for the industry to grow.



59. Post 32851965 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: Sitarow on March 21, 2018, 05:56:23 PM
I should probably also point out that the the electricity consumption debate on BTC is being magnified by the media. The data centers of the olympics consume way more than Bitcoin does, but ofcourse we don't pay any attention to that. If you hear the media talking about electricity consumption try for yourself to atleast get a frame of reference on what such consumption means. They're just comparing it to countries but what about certain data centers and payment solutions? How does it compare to those? How does it compare to an industrial complex? Those are the things you don't hear. Everyone is just salty for not buying BTC for pennies (  Grin )  

This is a popular form of whataboutism, that I have heard here before. People trying to justify the costly nature of bitcoin by comparing it to the incomparable. Just like you did here, by comparing the worlds nr1 athletic event with 3,6billion viewers to a speculative digital asset and with maximum 5 million active users.
The costs of running the bitcoin blockchain should be compared to the comparable - meaning to the costs of other blockchains!

No other blockchain is comparable to Bitcoin, because no other blockchain is decentralized, and in the end, that's all that really matters.


At first, bitcoin blockchain is centralized around pools. 3 pools are enough for a 51% attack. That makes bitcoin as centralized as most and more centralized then some.
Second, centralization will only matter to low educated millennials, who are dumb enough to actually believe the "bitcoin vs fiat" sales pitch BS narrative. In the real world of fiance and economy, what counts is efficiency, not fantasy.

3 Pools that  can quickly be abandoned by miners for other pools.

Takes moments to do.

In all honesty, I myself have always considered a 51% attack on any PoW or PoS coin a very low key threat. I was just replaying to the previous poster on why bitcoin isn't special in decentralization.

Its true, considering how difficulty targeting takes time with BTC unlike other coins having collusion with this much decentralization is next to impossible for many reasons both social and technical.

I do however have a growing concern with news articles and write ups coming from respected banking and tech institutions that elude to the idea that the only ground breaking technology worth anything is blockchain and that the rest associated with bitcoin can be cast aside.

Bitcoin is the rising tide and this attempt to disregard the Bitcoin network as a trivial thing is disconcerting.

Bitcoin has 3 important aspects to it that can't be ignored, disregarded  or trivialized as unimportant.

The size of overall hashrate doesn't mater much if the network is distributed between pools.

Most people in finance see the bitcoiners that come with bitcoin as dead weight. They are interested in shaping the technology and using it to personal advantage. No one is interested in making a bunch of people rich just for purchasing a digital token. And they can't be blamed for this because in the capitalist world we live in, it's the only logical choice. "The loyalty of Bitcoiner" isn't exactly higly valued, because well, bitcoiners come to the market mostly to consume, not to create.



60. Post 32852269 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 21, 2018, 06:20:57 PM
Considering ETH and EOS didn’t exist in 2014, and XRP was a dog, it’s all a bit fishy.  

2014 was mostly in fiat. Tried a little with PPC and LTC, but got out as soon as I was sober. ETH earned most in 2015, XRP and EOS earned most in 2017



61. Post 32853137 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 21, 2018, 06:37:37 PM
Considering ETH and EOS didn’t exist in 2014, and XRP was a dog, it’s all a bit fishy.  

2014 was mostly in fiat. Tried a little with PPC and LTC, but got out as soon as I was sober. ETH earned most in 2015, XRP and EOS earned most in 2017

That’s lovely. Why don’t you toddle off and go buy some $ICX or whatever it is you kids get up to these days.

Give me enough tears and I will go, I promise!



62. Post 32854516 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: Sitarow on March 21, 2018, 06:34:18 PM
I should probably also point out that the the electricity consumption debate on BTC is being magnified by the media. The data centers of the olympics consume way more than Bitcoin does, but ofcourse we don't pay any attention to that. If you hear the media talking about electricity consumption try for yourself to atleast get a frame of reference on what such consumption means. They're just comparing it to countries but what about certain data centers and payment solutions? How does it compare to those? How does it compare to an industrial complex? Those are the things you don't hear. Everyone is just salty for not buying BTC for pennies (  Grin )  

This is a popular form of whataboutism, that I have heard here before. People trying to justify the costly nature of bitcoin by comparing it to the incomparable. Just like you did here, by comparing the worlds nr1 athletic event with 3,6billion viewers to a speculative digital asset and with maximum 5 million active users.
The costs of running the bitcoin blockchain should be compared to the comparable - meaning to the costs of other blockchains!

No other blockchain is comparable to Bitcoin, because no other blockchain is decentralized, and in the end, that's all that really matters.


At first, bitcoin blockchain is centralized around pools. 3 pools are enough for a 51% attack. That makes bitcoin as centralized as most and more centralized then some.
Second, centralization will only matter to low educated millennials, who are dumb enough to actually believe the "bitcoin vs fiat" sales pitch BS narrative. In the real world of fiance and economy, what counts is efficiency, not fantasy.

3 Pools that  can quickly be abandoned by miners for other pools.

Takes moments to do.

In all honesty, I myself have always considered a 51% attack on any PoW or PoS coin a very low key threat. I was just replaying to the previous poster on why bitcoin isn't special in decentralization.

Its true, considering how difficulty targeting takes time with BTC unlike other coins having collusion with this much decentralization is next to impossible for many reasons both social and technical.

I do however have a growing concern with news articles and write ups coming from respected banking and tech institutions that elude to the idea that the only ground breaking technology worth anything is blockchain and that the rest associated with bitcoin can be cast aside.

Bitcoin is the rising tide and this attempt to disregard the Bitcoin network as a trivial thing is disconcerting.

Bitcoin has 3 important aspects to it that can't be ignored, disregarded  or trivialized as unimportant.

The size of overall hashrate doesn't mater much if the network is distributed between pools.

Most people in finance see the bitcoiners that come with bitcoin as dead weight. They are interested in shaping the technology and using it to personal advantage. No one is interested in making a bunch of people rich just for purchasing a digital token. And they can't be blamed for this because in the capitalist world we live in, it's the only logical choice. "The loyalty of Bitcoiner" isn't exactly higly valued, because well, bitcoiners come to the market mostly to consume, not to create.

Indeed that loyalty is not what I am implying. Its similar to anyone who may come along and say they wish to create their version of the internet. Some have argued that the most vocal people in "finance" are clueless with real world events and future prediction of human social evolutionary needs.

Factor in my recent post on how some in finance say that Bitcoin is overvalued but fail to understand there are serious benefits for it.

For instance some still feel the need to invest heavily into hardware mining for one reason or another and even tho it would prove more profitable to simply by Bitcoin at BTC/USD present rate.

Here is the numbers for you to review. I purposely only included hardware and electrical costs to simplify an already complex mining example of what it takes to make a single BTC at the interval rate of one every 12 days and 1 every day.

IMO you would have a better return if you solo mine if you had this much hash power.

What does it cost to generate 1BTC?

The fact that many don't understand what it takes to secure one bitcoin when statements like it costs fails to give the simple value at what interval is "ONE" bitcoin made.

This document shows how much mining power you would need to security one BTC a day and every 12 Days since difficulty is adjusting every 12-14 days on average.

To produce one bitcoin a day using the latest hardware from Bitmain would take an investment of $2,366,417.19 USD or about 250 BTC to secure a quantity of 1,020 S9 13.5 TH ASIC mining units. That equals a total hash rate of 13,770TH or 13.77 PH.

As you can see if you factor in just hardware loan repayment and power costs never mind any other type of costs and you run at a loss at $9500.00 - There are far better investments you can do than invest 2.3 million USD instead of hardware.

However those that do mine know that BTC at this price is a buy opportunity rather than investing in hardware.

Document: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11QS1BBV11KNGTF8N_-fdfmjTZ3WzPQFbLfVrl5n6R8s/edit?usp=sharing





Thank you for the well written reply.

It is possible that I am clueless regarding bitcoin. I just don't find this possibility highly probable. I think that the mentality involving bitcoiners is a little religious and therefor can be irrational and unpredictable. That is why I also often get surprised here.

I think that the overvaluation in bitcoin is currently supporting the overvaluation of fiat, and most people in finance realize this and it's benefits.

I don't think that the motivation to mine bitcoin is a good thing. It promotes wastage of energy and creation of equipment that only solves one problem and that problem doesn't even have to exist. This energy, effort and resources could be used with a lot more common sense.
Yeah, you would have better return alone, already by just losing pool fee. But sadly bitcoin isn't built in a way that it could be mined alone. Centralization and specialization were inevitable with the coming of ASICs and that was a big part of the reason why I lost faith in bitcoin. I see bitcoin ASIC mining as a foolish rat race that should not exist under the rule of common sense. All of this was about finding the cheapest solution to offer the most, now it's totally upside down.

But thank you again for the well written post. I don't see many of them here. I did enjoy reading the stats that you showed, but I just can't agree that motivating bitcoin mining is a good thing.




63. Post 32856317 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: infofront on March 21, 2018, 07:24:56 PM
I think that the overvaluation in bitcoin is currently supporting the overvaluation of fiat, and most people in finance realize this and it's benefits.

If anything, you've got that backwards.

Quote
I don't think that the motivation to mine bitcoin is a good thing. It promotes wastage of energy and creation of equipment that only solves one problem and that problem doesn't even have to exist. This energy, effort and resources could be used with a lot more common sense.

Look at the wastefulness of the legacy banking industry. Think about all the brick and mortar financial offices, banking branches, etc., and the electricity and heating fuel needed to run them. Now think about all of the gas-guzzling armored cars driving all over the world constantly to transport fiat, and the passenger cars transporting thousands (millions?) of financial industry workers daily. You could even considred the incredible amount of waste in human productivity, the economic drain of financial friction, etc. You could even begin to think about all of the human misery caused all over the world by corruption, and how triple entry accounting via bitcoin can change that, but I digress.

Bitcoin is, in fact, much more energy efficient than the legacy banking system. Also, we're still in the early days.

Again I see someone using whataboutism in a ugly manner.  Banking in general and bitcoin specifically are as comparable as a fidget spinner and a Rolls-Royce 900 Trent turbofan engine. The magnitude, properties and the general concept of things is just totally different, with only very vague similarities. You can only recruit new bitcoiners among the very dumb with this form of demagogy.



64. Post 32857247 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: STT on March 21, 2018, 07:37:04 PM
I should probably also point out that the the electricity consumption debate on BTC is being magnified by the media. The data centers of the olympics consume way more than Bitcoin does, but ofcourse we don't pay any attention to that. If you hear the media talking about electricity consumption try for yourself to atleast get a frame of reference on what such consumption means. They're just comparing it to countries but what about certain data centers and payment solutions? How does it compare to those? How does it compare to an industrial complex? Those are the things you don't hear. Everyone is just salty for not buying BTC for pennies (  Grin )  

This is a popular form of whataboutism, that I have heard here before. People trying to justify the costly nature of bitcoin by comparing it to the incomparable. Just like you did here, by comparing the worlds nr1 athletic event with 3,6billion viewers to a speculative digital asset and with maximum 5 million active users.
The costs of running the bitcoin blockchain should be compared to the comparable - meaning to the costs of other blockchains!

No other blockchain is comparable to Bitcoin, because no other blockchain is decentralized, and in the end, that's all that really matters.


At first, bitcoin blockchain is centralized around pools. 3 pools are enough for a 51% attack. That makes bitcoin as centralized as most and more centralized then some.
Second, centralization will only matter to low educated millennials, who are dumb enough to actually believe the "bitcoin vs fiat" sales pitch BS narrative. In the real world of fiance and economy, what counts is efficiency, not fantasy.
If you hate bitcoin so much why are you here?

I'm here for the tears of bitcoiners and sometimes some rainmaking is needed. Also, the sentiment here can also be a good indicator to help with my crypto gambling habbits.
Quote
centralization will only matter to low educated millennials

If you are here, its due to the internet which is... decentralised.   Yes it was designed that way quite famously, I thought everyone had heard of this.   Its very significant overall but also to crypto because otherwise it would be far easier to disrupt crypto standards.

So who does it matter to, everybody.     Not everyone has to use crypto but it should be considered in this way, in relation to the dollar reserve standard which is incredibly flawed and very much centralised.   Its an ongoing dynamic not a sales pitch to anyone or a slogan.   There are effects in play worth noting, this contrast between distribution and centralised authority and its effect on the failure of capitalism in the modern world is about the most important topic I can think of.
   Everyone is involved, either they speak or they haven't yet learnt the words or dont even understand the problem.  I dont think I'm wrong in assuming peak crypto could coincide with everyone speaking and everyone recognises there is a problem to global trade based on one country's currency.   Its been a known point of failure from its outset 70 years ago


The internet was mostly decentralized, now most of it's internet traffic is centralized to few large corporation. Value and usability have only risen together with centralization, so I repeat, that not many care about centralization. Efficiency to move large amounts of information cheap was the reason that caused Internets success. People don't care if it's centralized or not, just as long as it works.
And the inefficiency to move information cheap will cause the downfall of bitcoin .



65. Post 32858412 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: Sitarow on March 21, 2018, 07:41:55 PM
I should probably also point out that the the electricity consumption debate on BTC is being magnified by the media. The data centers of the olympics consume way more than Bitcoin does, but ofcourse we don't pay any attention to that. If you hear the media talking about electricity consumption try for yourself to atleast get a frame of reference on what such consumption means. They're just comparing it to countries but what about certain data centers and payment solutions? How does it compare to those? How does it compare to an industrial complex? Those are the things you don't hear. Everyone is just salty for not buying BTC for pennies (  Grin )  

This is a popular form of whataboutism, that I have heard here before. People trying to justify the costly nature of bitcoin by comparing it to the incomparable. Just like you did here, by comparing the worlds nr1 athletic event with 3,6billion viewers to a speculative digital asset and with maximum 5 million active users.
The costs of running the bitcoin blockchain should be compared to the comparable - meaning to the costs of other blockchains!

No other blockchain is comparable to Bitcoin, because no other blockchain is decentralized, and in the end, that's all that really matters.


At first, bitcoin blockchain is centralized around pools. 3 pools are enough for a 51% attack. That makes bitcoin as centralized as most and more centralized then some.
Second, centralization will only matter to low educated millennials, who are dumb enough to actually believe the "bitcoin vs fiat" sales pitch BS narrative. In the real world of fiance and economy, what counts is efficiency, not fantasy.

3 Pools that  can quickly be abandoned by miners for other pools.

Takes moments to do.

In all honesty, I myself have always considered a 51% attack on any PoW or PoS coin a very low key threat. I was just replaying to the previous poster on why bitcoin isn't special in decentralization.

Its true, considering how difficulty targeting takes time with BTC unlike other coins having collusion with this much decentralization is next to impossible for many reasons both social and technical.

I do however have a growing concern with news articles and write ups coming from respected banking and tech institutions that elude to the idea that the only ground breaking technology worth anything is blockchain and that the rest associated with bitcoin can be cast aside.

Bitcoin is the rising tide and this attempt to disregard the Bitcoin network as a trivial thing is disconcerting.

Bitcoin has 3 important aspects to it that can't be ignored, disregarded  or trivialized as unimportant.

The size of overall hashrate doesn't mater much if the network is distributed between pools.

Most people in finance see the bitcoiners that come with bitcoin as dead weight. They are interested in shaping the technology and using it to personal advantage. No one is interested in making a bunch of people rich just for purchasing a digital token. And they can't be blamed for this because in the capitalist world we live in, it's the only logical choice. "The loyalty of Bitcoiner" isn't exactly higly valued, because well, bitcoiners come to the market mostly to consume, not to create.

Indeed that loyalty is not what I am implying. Its similar to anyone who may come along and say they wish to create their version of the internet. Some have argued that the most vocal people in "finance" are clueless with real world events and future prediction of human social evolutionary needs.

Factor in my recent post on how some in finance say that Bitcoin is overvalued but fail to understand there are serious benefits for it.

For instance some still feel the need to invest heavily into hardware mining for one reason or another and even tho it would prove more profitable to simply by Bitcoin at BTC/USD present rate.

Here is the numbers for you to review. I purposely only included hardware and electrical costs to simplify an already complex mining example of what it takes to make a single BTC at the interval rate of one every 12 days and 1 every day.

IMO you would have a better return if you solo mine if you had this much hash power.

What does it cost to generate 1BTC?

The fact that many don't understand what it takes to secure one bitcoin when statements like it costs fails to give the simple value at what interval is "ONE" bitcoin made.

This document shows how much mining power you would need to security one BTC a day and every 12 Days since difficulty is adjusting every 12-14 days on average.

To produce one bitcoin a day using the latest hardware from Bitmain would take an investment of $2,366,417.19 USD or about 250 BTC to secure a quantity of 1,020 S9 13.5 TH ASIC mining units. That equals a total hash rate of 13,770TH or 13.77 PH.

As you can see if you factor in just hardware loan repayment and power costs never mind any other type of costs and you run at a loss at $9500.00 - There are far better investments you can do than invest 2.3 million USD instead of hardware.

However those that do mine know that BTC at this price is a buy opportunity rather than investing in hardware.

Document: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11QS1BBV11KNGTF8N_-fdfmjTZ3WzPQFbLfVrl5n6R8s/edit?usp=sharing





Thank you for the well written reply.

It is possible that I am clueless regarding bitcoin. I just don't find this possibility highly probable. I think that the mentality involving bitcoiners is a little religious and therefor can be irrational and unpredictable. That is why I also often get surprised here.

I think that the overvaluation in bitcoin is currently supporting the overvaluation of fiat, and most people in finance realize this and it's benefits.

I don't think that the motivation to mine bitcoin is a good thing. It promotes wastage of energy and creation of equipment that only solves one problem and that problem doesn't even have to exist. This energy, effort and resources could be used with a lot more common sense.
Yeah, you would have better return alone, already by just losing pool fee. But sadly bitcoin isn't built in a way that it could be mined alone. Centralization and specialization were inevitable with the coming of ASICs and that was a big part of the reason why I lost faith in bitcoin. I see bitcoin ASIC mining as a foolish rat race that should not exist under the rule of common sense. All of this was about finding the cheapest solution to offer the most, now it's totally upside down.

But thank you again for the well written post. I don't see many of them here. I did enjoy reading the stats that you showed, but I just can't agree that motivating bitcoin mining is a good thing.



Bitcoin mining is just one aspect of the big picture, I simply use it as a way to help me and others see things from a different perspective.

As you had pointed out, the nature of greed can undermine any project. But as this is an open market, if mining makes business sense then so be it.

At this price point for many it does not. Yet the network continues to grow.



You explained yourself well and it's a pleasure to converse with you.

It's a good thing that this industry stimulated the current financial climate, but it's very dangerous that this industry is so bitcoin centric. People should come back to earth and acknowledge that you can't create an independently valued currency with this simplistic distribution model. That bitcoin was just the first usable product of this quickly developing industry, like the Altair was with personal computing. If attention is stuck in bitcoin and it's stagnant technological development, just because some crooks made up some goxdollars or tether to draw alot of attention, then to me it's a bad thing for the industry.



66. Post 32859027 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: infofront on March 21, 2018, 06:41:06 PM
Considering ETH and EOS didn’t exist in 2014, and XRP was a dog, it’s all a bit fishy.  

2014 was mostly in fiat. Tried a little with PPC and LTC, but got out as soon as I was sober. ETH earned most in 2015, XRP and EOS earned most in 2017

That’s lovely. Why don’t you toddle off and go buy some $ICX or whatever it is you kids get up to these days.

Give me enough tears and I will go, I promise!

Whatever discomfort the failure to break back up through the ~$9,000 resistance has caused me is being offset by the pleasure of deleting your posts.  Smiley

I have no objections. The posts that you have deleted held little value and I think that you have moderated this thread in a cool and objective manner.
To my defense, I tend to troll those who attempt to troll me. I can't help mirroring people like that.



67. Post 32880449 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

So, you guys ready for more tears or do you need a break?



68. Post 32880949 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: pacman7331 on March 22, 2018, 06:23:06 AM
So, you guys ready for more tears or do you need a break?

Lemmie guess 6k?   Cheesy

No no no.. this is too fast.. You never milk a bitcoiner for it's tears too quickly, or else it will get stressed and will stop producing tears. What you do is make them cry just a little to get you satisfied and then you wait until the subject is rested and recharged and then you repeat the process. Overall yield for tears is times bigger like this.



69. Post 32882403 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: pacman7331 on March 22, 2018, 06:31:26 AM
So, you guys ready for more tears or do you need a break?

Lemmie guess 6k?   Cheesy

No no no.. this is too fast.. You never milk a bitcoiner for it's tears too quickly, or else it will get stressed and will stop producing tears. What you do is make them cry just a little to get you satisfied and then you wait until the subject is rested and recharged and then you repeat the process. Overall yield for tears is times bigger like this.

8500?

This is more likely, yes.



70. Post 32882669 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: TERA2 on March 22, 2018, 06:48:50 AM
With ETH about to go to $30, why would anyone want to buy it?

Cool name. Proof of stake coming... new tokens every day on the blockchain, dapps
and a single monarch who forks the coin to protect his own investments in failed dapps

Even if ETH has been my biggest earner, I have to agree that it is also running out of potential like bitcoin did in the past. In all probability, EOS will eventually make it obsolete. My senses tell me that EOS will get the most hype because of this in the coming year or two.



71. Post 32883278 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 22, 2018, 07:14:20 AM
EOS.  The coin with the year long ICO.  The coin that has achieved nothing despite raising US$700 million. The coin that is currently tanking the ETH price because the dev team are running scared from the SEC.  A coin with no purpose, no value and no access to the EOS platform. 

Tell us more about your glorious shitcoin Jacques. 

It's impressive to see someone this informed on the subject.



72. Post 32888204 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: bones261 on March 22, 2018, 03:41:22 AM
I went back 7 pages to find any discussion on the 300 million new USDT and gave up. Too many of these retards in this thread.

If you want to keep up with the conversation on Tethers, you can go to this link. https://twitter.com/bitfinexed?lang=en
This has been a hot topic of conversation for several month. You really think all of the Bitcoin whales have been oblivious to this factor for several months?Huh The fact that Bitfinex/Tether has not been the most transparent regarding this matter is already priced in. If Tether is indeed a shitcoin, with absolutely no USD to back it up, the honey badger doesn't give a shit. Are we overly concerned when some other shitcoin makes a tumble because it's a scam? BTC is traded for those shitcoins too, just like Tether.


Although true, I was under the assumption that Tether had alot to do with the initial pump in OCT.


Also I don't follow twitter and This 300 MILLION USDT was created Yesterday.

https://omniexplorer.info/tx/f3efac4b6203248fc06e2788b61e732319a6e596768f5240680f944780ff84f4

If Tether is legit, then the printing of Tethers is justified by people making actual wire transfers to Bitfinex and Bitfinex making sure there are enough tethers for people to transfer them to other exchanges if they care to.
If Tether is not legit, then the house of cards will tumble and Bitfinex will become insolvent. Good riddance. Honey badger may end up taking a little nap after getting bitten; but in the end honey badger won't give a shit.

Sadly, my guess is that tether is not legit. Something like that wouldn't have transparency issues if it were legit.
There are more questions on the subject though. Like will it pay off? What will be done with the payoff, and how interested will TPTB be in keeping this make believe industry afloat?
Currently it seems that things are going in their favor. They don't have delays with withdrawals yet and the regulators seem especially blind. I'm uncertain on the outcome of this.



73. Post 32894203 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: mike4001 on March 22, 2018, 10:08:51 AM
Lol and again below 9k

Do you guys realize that the barriers we cannot break keep falling down?

First it was 12k, then 11k and now it's 9,5k ...




74. Post 32907676 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):




75. Post 32920179 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Any cute chicks here looking for a fatherly figure to tell them about the magick of crypto?



76. Post 32927500 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on March 22, 2018, 06:19:26 PM


Even if ETH has been my biggest earner, I have to agree that it is also running out of potential like bitcoin did in the past. In all probability, EOS will eventually make it obsolete. My senses tell me that EOS will get the most hype because of this in the coming year or two.

LOL. Quoting for posterity.  Will consider for a tshirt, or part of my dark ages crypto quote collage I will be hanging on my wall in a decade or so.

I understand if this can be a little confusing for you.



77. Post 32929006 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: Searing on March 22, 2018, 06:36:02 PM
Any cute chicks here looking for a fatherly figure to tell them about the magick of crypto?

Tried that...they just smile..and pat your hand and ask if you want a nap...it is discouraging



Even after you explained her that cryptos are guided by ancient secret rituals of sexual nature, and she has been chosen to participate in this ritual that only a few in history have witnessed?



78. Post 32955684 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Bitcoiners must be punished for the attempt to deceive Karhu.



79. Post 33036415 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: realr0ach on March 24, 2018, 07:52:04 AM
The reason Jews have been kicked out of different countries over 100 times now is because they refuse to police their own kind, which always results in collective punishment against them.

Do you police everyone your own kind? Do you also deserve collective punishment for the crimes of your kind?



80. Post 33041401 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: realr0ach on March 24, 2018, 08:25:31 AM
The reason Jews have been kicked out of different countries over 100 times now is because they refuse to police their own kind, which always results in collective punishment against them.

Do you police everyone your own kind? Do you also deserve collective punishment for the crimes of your kind?

Whites and Asians obviously police their own kind.  Jews do not because their cult claims crimes committed against "Goyim" (aka everyone who is not them) are okay.  They even claim stealing organs from other races is fine, which is why:

NYT Finds 'Disproportionate Role' of Israelis in World Organ Trafficking

https://www.haaretz.com/israelis-exposed-in-organ-trafficking-1.5259773

It is the Jew's own fault they force everyone they come in contact with into a scenario where they are forced to destroy or deport the Jews or be destroyed themselves.  

I'll tell you a little secret. Racism or any other expression of generalized hate is mostly created by criminals, who want to hide specific criminal names and faces in this opaque fog of generalized hate. Crooks never care about anyone but themselves. They don't care about others, with who they share their race, nationality or culture either. They mostly work with other crooks, not caring about their race and background either. The only thing they care about is how useful other people can be. Crime is without borders and colors like that.
People who spread racism are very useful to the same crooks. If someone is attacked by loud racists without substance long enough, then this someone will eventually be also immune to constructive criticisms. If someone is attacked with nonsense long enough, then others expect that all attacks towards that person is nonsense, even if it isn't.



81. Post 33146459 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.49h):

Quote from: realr0ach on March 25, 2018, 05:45:36 AM
I'll tell you a little secret. Racism or any other expression of generalized hate is mostly created by criminals, who want to hide specific criminal names and faces in this opaque fog of generalized hate. Crooks never care about anyone but themselves. They don't care about others, with who they share their race, nationality or culture either. They mostly work with other crooks, not caring about their race and background either. The only thing they care about is how useful other people can be. Crime is without borders and colors like that.
People who spread racism are very useful to the same crooks. If someone is attacked by loud racists without substance long enough, then this someone will eventually be also immune to constructive criticisms. If someone is attacked with nonsense long enough, then others expect that all attacks towards that person is nonsense, even if it isn't.

That was the most nonsensical, buffoonish thing I've ever read.

Fact:  Everyone on the planet is "racist".

Fact:  Preference alone is "racism".  If you have a marriage/reproductive preference (not one night stand) in type of female you like more than others, you're subconsciously saying those genes are superior to what you didn't pick (unless you're settling and didn't get what you actually wanted).

Fact:  Most males of all races prefer white women.

Fact:  If you're brown, black, whatever, and disregard your own kind of women and solely seek out white women, you're a self hating nigger, white supremacist.

Fact:  Humans evolved in ethnocentric tribes and being more comfortable with your own tribe than others is not "hate".

Fact:  I will invade France again.

Sorry boy, but you're just a tool for those who care less then you.



82. Post 33419532 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Pigs will always get slaughtered, and everyone who expected the bullrun to just continue after 2017 Dec, were greedy little pigs who got what they deserve. Same here, with pigs thinking that every little spike upwards marks a trend reversal to a new bullrun. These pigs will also get slaughtered. Everything is the same as 2014.



83. Post 33420574 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: pacman7331 on March 29, 2018, 06:19:26 AM
One day you’ll get what u deserve too.

If you really think so, then thank you!



84. Post 33421735 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

TA with bitcoin is rationalization of gambling.
What counts is if 7 billion $ flows in to pay for the miners cost, or this 7 billion $ will be taken out coin value. Extremely expensive mining is the biggest flaw of bitcoin. Because of this, if bitcoin isn't expanding, then it will be quickly imploding on the weight of it's mining costs.



85. Post 33422501 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 29, 2018, 06:55:41 AM
Which is why difficulty can fall my dear boy. 

Difficulty may fall, but the amount of equipment built won't fall. Bitcoiners are dumb thinking that difficulty just drops and some people just turn off their machinery. Who will those people be? Most of the bitcoin mining is done by specialized mining companies, that have a very specific business plan and expectations. These companies will go as much in debt as possible, just to keep the machines alive, because considering production logic, just turning off the purchased machinery is the worst option.
First ones to fall will be those, who will run out of credit and their collected coins "that were meant to be sold in better times" will be dumped on the market by bankruptcy proceedings. This will in turn create a chain reaction of price dropping more together with difficulty.
Bitcoin mining is heavily flawed because it's too expensive and it's attributes create an instability timebomb. Satoshi may have been a good coder but he was pretty dumb in economics and finance.

PoW mining would only work if it wouldn't be cheaper to mass-produce coins. Then decentralization would also work. Rewarding mass production PoW mining is idiocy at it's best.



86. Post 33422951 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: criptix on March 29, 2018, 07:09:50 AM
Which is why difficulty can fall my dear boy. 

Difficulty may fall, but the amount of equipment built won't fall. Bitcoiners are dumb thinking that difficulty just drops and some people just turn off their machinery. Who will those people be? Most of the bitcoin mining is done by specialized mining companies, that have a very specific business plan and expectations. These companies will go as much in debt as possible, just to keep the machines alive, because considering production logic, just turning off the purchased machinery is the worst option.
First ones to fall will be those, who will run out of credit and their collected coins "that were meant to be sold in better times" will be dumped on the market by bankruptcy proceedings. This will in turn create a chain reaction of price dropping more together with difficulty.
Bitcoin mining is heavily flawed because it's too expensive and it's attributes create an instability timebomb. Satoshi may have been a good coder but he was pretty dumb in economics and finance.

PoW mining would only work if it wouldn't be cheaper to mass-produce coins. Then decentralization would also work. Rewarding mass production PoW mining is idiocy at it's best.

The bigger the mining operation the greater part of mined coins get wold asap to pay mining expenses.

Private miners are the people who holdand sit on losses.

Coins will only be sold if the current price is in a profitable level. If it isn't, then those coins are stored and the expenses are covered with debt.
This will create an illusion of bigger value, since the coins are stored not sold, but this illusion will drop very quickly as soon as the miners run out of credit before the coins become profitable again.



87. Post 33423136 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

It's no point in trying to argue that the hashrate will drop together with the price.
We can jut look at the hashrate history and see that IT DOES NOT DROP together with the price: https://charts.bitcoin.com/chart/hash-rate

Miners are tied down and they continue production with a loss, just because they share the same foolish dream, that bitcoin is too big to fail. But the costs will eventually payed one way or another.



88. Post 33423463 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 29, 2018, 07:21:34 AM
Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.



89. Post 33423630 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 29, 2018, 07:25:17 AM
Pigs will always get slaughtered, and everyone who expected the bullrun to just continue after 2017 Dec, were greedy little pigs who got what they deserve. Same here, with pigs thinking that every little spike upwards marks a trend reversal to a new bullrun. These pigs will also get slaughtered. Everything is the same as 2014.

I nominate JayJuanGee for Lord of the Pigs.

Explain ur selfie roachie poachie.

What makes me a BIG pig, exactly?   

Don't I have a sustainable strategy that involves accumulation of BTC by buying when the price goes down and selling when the price goes up?  Is there something greedy about that?

Am I not gambling on every little turn of the BTC price by attempting to bet everything in one direction or another, but instead I am employing, incrementalism in my buy/sell approach, no?

Are you dissing me, because I don't buy into your more, supposedly conservative, PM point of view that actually doesn't really seem to hold value too well?

It seems that I don't follow your specific "knowledgeable" writings enough in order to understand how you would be arriving at your seemingly nonsensical conclusion to classify me as a kind of BIG pig within the subject matter of this thread.  Explain ur selfie.

I think that with less caffeine you would be normal.



90. Post 33423747 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on March 29, 2018, 07:28:13 AM
Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.

I can keep the entire Bitcoin network afloat on my laptop with a low enough difficulty. What’s your point?

My point is that you probably will in the future.



91. Post 33424134 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: pacman7331 on March 29, 2018, 07:31:18 AM
Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.

So what you are saying is that if bitcoin doesn’t go up? It goes down?

  Shocked

Exactly. There is no option for stability and keeping present value. It either has to expand, or it will start shrinking very quickly. It's really like a pyramid scheme in that manner.
If coin production would cost less, then the price would drop as long as the speculators are selling and then it would stop. With high production costs it won't stop, but will squeeze every juice out of this thing as possible.



92. Post 33440734 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 29, 2018, 08:19:06 AM
Because their electricity costs are currently still lower than their marginal cost of production, you numpty.  

If you’re going to troll, at least apply some brainpower first.

Yeah, and the electricity costs are still 5billion $ a year (7$ billion overall revenue). And this is the point I was making in the start, that you tried to stear away. Your childish demagogy won't work here. 7 Billion still needs to be payed to miners every year just to keep this crap afloat.

So what you are saying is that if bitcoin doesn’t go up? It goes down?

  Shocked

Exactly. There is no option for stability and keeping present value. It either has to expand, or it will start shrinking very quickly. It's really like a pyramid scheme in that manner.
If coin production would cost less, then the price would drop as long as the speculators are selling and then it would stop. With high production costs it won't stop, but will squeeze every juice out of this thing as possible.

Do you realize, you seemingly dimwitted trolljob, that there has been a price battle in bitcoin that has been going on for several years now, and it has periods of greater intensity.

Furthermore, with s-curve adoption, there are going to be a large number of price finding attempts at various points, which just means both up and down volatility.. while at the same time upwards price appreciation, that is still manipulated down from time to time, even while the price is largely heading exponentially upwards...

Hopefully, you are smart enough to both get paid in bitcoin for your stupid-ass trolling job, and not to really buy into the bullshit that you are propagating because you really cannot believe the nonsense that you are attempting to spread, can you?

I think that if you would just try drinking less coffee, then you wouldn't get upset so easily, and you would be able to express yourself more clearly.



93. Post 33447219 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: Torque on March 29, 2018, 01:22:15 PM
Guys, your reasons for the continuing downtrend are all wrong.

It's pretty simple.

1. Whale(s) spend a full year pumping Bitcoin and altcoins to the moon, using massive leverage.

2. Whale(s) gain control of the float and thin it out, pushing prices to the moon.

3. Whale(s) massively short sell/dump in one go. Ending bull run.  Whale mega money then sits on sidelines.

4. Whale(s) use lotza coins to squeeze remaining float up and down to make money trading. Mostly down.

5. Average Joes finally lose interest. Sell at bottom.

... and then... eventually... (*we are not there yet*)...

6. Whale(s) use sidelined mega money to scoop up cheap coins at the bottom. Downtrend over. Next bull run starts.

There are no "reasons". There are no plausible "FUD". Its just the way it goes.



Avarage Joe hasn't lost interest yet. You still seem very interested.



94. Post 33451185 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: d_eddie on March 29, 2018, 01:45:56 PM
Except he isn't Average Joe.

Oh yeah? Please explain.



95. Post 33453247 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

BTC vs BCH - two kids with developmental disabilities, arguing on who is more retarded.



96. Post 33653868 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

So many pigs in here, trying to hope a trend reversal out of nothing. Just like in 2014.



97. Post 33654099 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: windjc on April 01, 2018, 07:58:15 AM
So many pigs in here, trying to hope a trend reversal out of nothing. Just like in 2014.

2014 went up a 100% during one 3 month period. Did you forget that, or are you just blabbering something just to hear yourself talk?

Even if it dropped 4x during that year, it was such a good year for bitcoin. <--- a typical bitcoin pig logic.



98. Post 33654396 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: serveria.com on April 01, 2018, 08:03:24 AM
So many pigs in here, trying to hope a trend reversal out of nothing. Just like in 2014.

So many beartrolls here. I hope you're earning at least $2 per post? Your job is to scare the shit out of noob hodlers and get more cheap coins for your employer (or yourself?). Bitcoin is unpredictable. What happened in 2014 won't happen ever again most probably.

Yup, my recommendations to sell for several months already have been especially damaging to noobs. The bitcoin pig recommendations to just hold have worked like a charm in the meantime.



99. Post 33654552 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: windjc on April 01, 2018, 08:01:52 AM
So many pigs in here, trying to hope a trend reversal out of nothing. Just like in 2014.

2014 went up a 100% during one 3 month period. Did you forget that, or are you just blabbering something just to hear yourself talk?

Even if it dropped 4x during that year, it was such a good year for bitcoin. <--- a typical bitcoin pig logic.

It was fucking awesome. Read my edited post above.

Glad to see you back in this thread. I think that when not considering JayJuanGee, then you are the most entertaining pig here. You always found very creative reasons to justify yourself being wrong again.



100. Post 33654731 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: windjc on April 01, 2018, 08:09:03 AM
So many pigs in here, trying to hope a trend reversal out of nothing. Just like in 2014.

2014 went up a 100% during one 3 month period. Did you forget that, or are you just blabbering something just to hear yourself talk?

Even if it dropped 4x during that year, it was such a good year for bitcoin. <--- a typical bitcoin pig logic.

It was fucking awesome. Read my edited post above.

Glad to see you back in this thread. I think that when not considering JayJuanGee, then you are the most entertaining pig here. You always found very creative reasons to justify yourself being wrong again.

Im so wrong I could certainly buy and sell you 10x (probably 100x) over. Cause of all the bad crypto decisions Ive made.

You seem proud of your vast wealth. It's good to see someone who can do that since his taxes are all in order.



101. Post 33654981 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: windjc on April 01, 2018, 08:13:14 AM
So many pigs in here, trying to hope a trend reversal out of nothing. Just like in 2014.

2014 went up a 100% during one 3 month period. Did you forget that, or are you just blabbering something just to hear yourself talk?

Even if it dropped 4x during that year, it was such a good year for bitcoin. <--- a typical bitcoin pig logic.

It was fucking awesome. Read my edited post above.

Glad to see you back in this thread. I think that when not considering JayJuanGee, then you are the most entertaining pig here. You always found very creative reasons to justify yourself being wrong again.

Im so wrong I could certainly buy and sell you 10x (probably 100x) over. Cause of all the bad crypto decisions Ive made.

You seem proud of your vast wealth. It's good to see someone who can do that since his taxes are all in order.

By the way, feel free to post my past posts that were so wrong. I'm curious how long it'll take you to dig something up.

Sadly, you are a little more curious about this subject them I am.



102. Post 33655212 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: windjc on April 01, 2018, 08:16:24 AM
So many pigs in here, trying to hope a trend reversal out of nothing. Just like in 2014.

2014 went up a 100% during one 3 month period. Did you forget that, or are you just blabbering something just to hear yourself talk?

Even if it dropped 4x during that year, it was such a good year for bitcoin. <--- a typical bitcoin pig logic.

It was fucking awesome. Read my edited post above.

Glad to see you back in this thread. I think that when not considering JayJuanGee, then you are the most entertaining pig here. You always found very creative reasons to justify yourself being wrong again.

Im so wrong I could certainly buy and sell you 10x (probably 100x) over. Cause of all the bad crypto decisions Ive made.

You seem proud of your vast wealth. It's good to see someone who can do that since his taxes are all in order.

By the way, feel free to post my past posts that were so wrong. I'm curious how long it'll take you to dig something up.

Sadly, you are a little more curious about this subject them I am.

Yeah, thats what I thought. A nothing burger from a nothing burger. Smiley

At least you tried.



103. Post 33655811 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: windjc on April 01, 2018, 08:24:01 AM
Some LOLZ:

In 2015 Jacques posted this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg11631529#msg11631529

then in 2018 he was hating on bitcoin starting here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2965877.msg30527709#msg30527709

Guess he sold all his btc in 2015. LOL.

No posts from late 2015 to Feb 2018. Once the bear was back. LOL. Could it be more obvious?

Watching you work is a privilege.



104. Post 33676121 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: Colonel Panic on April 01, 2018, 01:00:29 PM
So many pigs in here, trying to hope a trend reversal out of nothing. Just like in 2014.

2014 went up a 100% during one 3 month period. Did you forget that, or are you just blabbering something just to hear yourself talk?

What I remember about 2014 and 2015 were all the beartards chanting "$99, $99, $99." It was incessant and for months and months. Meanwhile smart people - like myself divested into small upstart cryptos and three years later were rewarded with 25000%+ gains.

So, yeah, I love a mutha fuck'n bear market as much as the next guy. I'm just not stupid about it.

windjc gave excellent advice back then.  I remember clearly, thinking it was probably a good idea to follow.  Wish I had  Tongue

Windjc is one of the best here. His long term views and shorter term calls are always worth hearing.

The other guy, not so much.




105. Post 33678525 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

I wonder, how many of those "HOLD BITCOIN, YEAH!" accounts are actually just sock puppets of old coin holders, who are themselves unloading their coins on the market and cheering for everyone else to hold value in the meantime.



106. Post 33689115 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Bitcoin amazed everyone by going to heights that was thought to be impossible. Soon it will amaze everyone again, by dropping to levels that was thought to be impossible.



107. Post 33692509 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 01, 2018, 03:49:35 PM
Bitcoin amazed everyone by going to heights that was thought to be impossible. Soon it will amaze everyone again, by dropping to levels that was thought to be impossible.

We’ll just have to wait & see, there’s going to be an absolute bottom at some point & a lot of amateur traders shorting are going to get burnt BADLY.

I’m HODLING until a year or so after the next halving & whilst it sucks (badly) seeing your net worth slump like this at least technically I’m losing nothing as xxx bitcoin’s are still xxx bitcoin’s.

I wouldn’t want to be trading this beast on margin’s now, a lot of people are going to get fucked in the ass.

The most frequent mistake that traders make with bitcoin, is thinking that the bottom will be some quick deep drop, followed by a quick recovery. That assumption makes them jump the gun, because their greed gets the best on them. The actual bottom won't be nearly as fun. If the bottom is reached, then it will stay there for a long time until it starts to seem like there is no possibility for revival. This is necessary for the minority rich to win over the majority of the poor. The more money you have, the more patience you can afford. Those will be shaken the most, who used their necessary livelihood to buy bitcoins and expected a quick profit.

I think that bitcoin is still on the way down and hasn't rested on some stronger floor yet. But there is no need to hurry, because there will be plenty of time.

I keep away from margin trading. Keeping it simple is keeping more control in your hands and less control in the hands of "the casino". The exchanges aren't neutral entities in this market. Most of them play their own books aggressively, while using the advantages of insider information and the weight of "funny money" that they are able to create.

I think that I'll wait until bitcoin bottoms out, and then will channel my gambling funds to several high risk/high reward coins that have most developmental potential.
Staying away from bitcoin and risking on the newcomers has worked out great for me since 2014. Have won multiple times better gains then could of gotten with bitcoin.
Currently it's best to stay in fiat, since the overall trend is clearly down and these bear market little swings are too unpredictable to be worth the risk.



108. Post 33696551 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: jbreher on April 01, 2018, 04:57:16 PM
Even if it dropped 4x during that year, it was such a good year for bitcoin.

Well, it was. Perhaps you are so laser-focused on the instantaneous price that you are blind to everything else in the ecosystem. Large investments were made in 2014, developing the facilities that provided increased utility. Which in turn led to the late 2017 spike.

Sorry, but I can't take bitcoin ecosystem with any serious consideration. That ecosystem is a payment network with 5 million active users and 7 billion $ of mining costs. If the ecosystem would have any importance on the price, then bitcoin value would be in double digits or less. Hype and high hopes dictate the price in crypto markets, not the development of the ecosystem.



109. Post 33697989 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: mike4001 on April 01, 2018, 05:24:56 PM
Nice pump.

Should I now sell everything before the inevidible dump ?

Probably.. the general rule is that you sell during this quick pumps. Quick pumps like that are meant to cause FOMO and because of that, a slow bleed downwards will probably follow.



110. Post 33730192 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

The best thing to hope for in this situation would be a fast and deep drop. It would at least temporarily shake things up and make the crypto game fun again. This probably won't happen, because a slow bleed is most profitable to the few, who own most of this market. Everyone else should "HODL tight", until they are unloading their "digital hope" into real wealth. This is the never-ending cycle of crypto-gambling.



111. Post 33752919 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

I must confess, I was a little tempted to buy some EOS, but the feeling that we'll see more tears in the next 12h just won't leave me.



112. Post 33754077 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: Phil_S on April 02, 2018, 11:55:12 AM
Shut the fuck up with your 'tears' already, Bittard. What are you, 12?

I can't help it, bitcoiner tears are one of the best parts in gambling with cryptos. I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out.



113. Post 33754808 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: Phil_S on April 02, 2018, 12:15:36 PM
You can help it, if you an adult.

I really can't.. bitcoiners could help me by being a little less entitled, self-righteous, greedy and dumb. Maybe then their tears wouldn't taste so good? Who knows..



114. Post 33758117 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: serveria.com on April 02, 2018, 12:52:52 PM
You can help it, if you an adult.

I really can't.. bitcoiners could help me by being a little less entitled, self-righteous, greedy and dumb. Maybe then their tears wouldn't taste so good? Who knows..

Funny to hear it from someone who sold BTC in 2015. You have already failed by not hodling until december 2017... but I bet you will feel even worse soon when BTC will hit $100k.  Grin

You are mistaken with something. I stopped playing with BTC in 2013, not 2015. It has been a profitable decision.



115. Post 33760817 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: serveria.com on April 02, 2018, 01:27:10 PM
You can help it, if you an adult.

I really can't.. bitcoiners could help me by being a little less entitled, self-righteous, greedy and dumb. Maybe then their tears wouldn't taste so good? Who knows..

Funny to hear it from someone who sold BTC in 2015. You have already failed by not hodling until december 2017... but I bet you will feel even worse soon when BTC will hit $100k.  Grin

You are mistaken with something. I stopped playing with BTC in 2013, not 2015. It has been a profitable decision.

We can easily find out if your decision was profitable or not - please let us know how many BTC you owned and the price you sold them for. Then compare it to the December 2017 price and calculate your losses  Grin   I bet you feel butthurt and can't wait for BTC to hit $2k so you can rebuy. But no, that's not gonna happen...

Nice try, friendo, but the detailed numbers of my little gambling funds will remain private. I shared the same fortune as anyone who bought potential alts instead of bitcoin. Even LTC has had a lot better gains and LTC is almost as old and outdated as BTC. Only the BTC cultists seem blind of the fact that there aren't many cryptos out there that earn less then BTC during bull markets.



116. Post 33762423 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):



Denial is the current dominating sentiment.



117. Post 33762503 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: serveria.com on April 02, 2018, 01:53:23 PM
You can help it, if you an adult.

I really can't.. bitcoiners could help me by being a little less entitled, self-righteous, greedy and dumb. Maybe then their tears wouldn't taste so good? Who knows..

Funny to hear it from someone who sold BTC in 2015. You have already failed by not hodling until december 2017... but I bet you will feel even worse soon when BTC will hit $100k.  Grin

You are mistaken with something. I stopped playing with BTC in 2013, not 2015. It has been a profitable decision.

We can easily find out if your decision was profitable or not - please let us know how many BTC you owned and the price you sold them for. Then compare it to the December 2017 price and calculate your losses  Grin   I bet you feel butthurt and can't wait for BTC to hit $2k so you can rebuy. But no, that's not gonna happen...

Nice try, friendo, but the detailed numbers of my little gambling funds will remain private. I shared the same fortune as anyone who bought potential alts instead of bitcoin. Even LTC has had a lot better gains and LTC is almost as old and outdated as BTC. Only the BTC cultists seem blind of the fact that there aren't many cryptos out there that earn less then BTC during bull markets.

So what is the reason you're here? Go visit some litecointalk.org or some shitcointalk.org  Grin and share some altcoin success stories with losers like yourself...

Like I said, bitcoiners tears taste the best.



118. Post 33764007 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: serveria.com on April 02, 2018, 02:10:30 PM
You can help it, if you an adult.

I really can't.. bitcoiners could help me by being a little less entitled, self-righteous, greedy and dumb. Maybe then their tears wouldn't taste so good? Who knows..

Funny to hear it from someone who sold BTC in 2015. You have already failed by not hodling until december 2017... but I bet you will feel even worse soon when BTC will hit $100k.  Grin

You are mistaken with something. I stopped playing with BTC in 2013, not 2015. It has been a profitable decision.

We can easily find out if your decision was profitable or not - please let us know how many BTC you owned and the price you sold them for. Then compare it to the December 2017 price and calculate your losses  Grin   I bet you feel butthurt and can't wait for BTC to hit $2k so you can rebuy. But no, that's not gonna happen...

Nice try, friendo, but the detailed numbers of my little gambling funds will remain private. I shared the same fortune as anyone who bought potential alts instead of bitcoin. Even LTC has had a lot better gains and LTC is almost as old and outdated as BTC. Only the BTC cultists seem blind of the fact that there aren't many cryptos out there that earn less then BTC during bull markets.

So what is the reason you're here? Go visit some litecointalk.org or some shitcointalk.org  Grin and share some altcoin success stories with losers like yourself...

Like I said, bitcoiners tears taste the best.

Yeah, but I'm not in tears I'm smiling  Grin but you'll surely be drowning in tears in a year or so... BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC

Not now, but I predict to see some bitcoiner tears in a day. Will see..



119. Post 33822044 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

So, you guys ready for tears or will we wait till Wednesday?



120. Post 33823542 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 03, 2018, 09:10:13 AM
So, you guys ready for tears or will we wait till Wednesday?

So tell us Jacques, what’s the price going to do this week?  Give us some hard numbers to work with.  

And while you are at it, tell us what’s going to happen in the second half of April.  I will happily accept a price range for that period.  

 

Making precise predictions with cryptos is mostly done by gambling addicts, who try to rationalize their addiction. I'd like to consider myself as just a gambler, so no hard numbers from me. The people who oversee the exact inflow of fiat, and share that information with each-other in a friendly fashion, are the people who know best, and even they aren't certain on the outcome of things.
I'll tell you this. I'll buy into some interesting new cryptos if this upward movement gets some proper volume testing. I'm not interested in playing these little swings that last a week at most. During bear markets, "the casino" plays very aggressively, so the juice is not just worth the squeeze. Lack of patience will cost a lot to inexperienced traders during these periods.



121. Post 33824342 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: serveria.com on April 03, 2018, 09:38:12 AM
So, you guys ready for tears or will we wait till Wednesday?

So tell us Jacques, what’s the price going to do this week?  Give us some hard numbers to work with.  

And while you are at it, tell us what’s going to happen in the second half of April.  I will happily accept a price range for that period.  

 If you want to make a contribution, provide some analysis.  Provide reasons.   Otherwise it’s just a circle jerk. 

Don't bother he's just a troll. A failure.

Yet, you are the one trying to troll me.. a crazy world we live in.



122. Post 33828034 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: serveria.com on April 03, 2018, 10:07:55 AM
So, you guys ready for tears or will we wait till Wednesday?

So tell us Jacques, what’s the price going to do this week?  Give us some hard numbers to work with.  

And while you are at it, tell us what’s going to happen in the second half of April.  I will happily accept a price range for that period.  

 If you want to make a contribution, provide some analysis.  Provide reasons.   Otherwise it’s just a circle jerk. 

Don't bother he's just a troll. A failure.

Yet, you are the one trying to troll me.. a crazy world we live in.

Yeah so you predicted bull tears today? Where is it? I can only see a green dildo in bear ass! You failed again bro!

Like I said, no one knows the certain direction of this beast. I'm also wrong sometimes, not often, but sometimes I truly am. If you have to be wrong, then you better be wrong when it won't cost you money. Although, I haven't seen any tears yet, we shouldn't forget that today is not over yet. Luckily, your eager enthusiasm and feeling of certainty encourages me. Maybe we'll still see some nice bitcoiner tears. Maybe we are so lucky..



123. Post 33828512 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: pacman7331 on April 03, 2018, 10:43:26 AM
So, you guys ready for tears or will we wait till Wednesday?

So tell us Jacques, what’s the price going to do this week?  Give us some hard numbers to work with.  

And while you are at it, tell us what’s going to happen in the second half of April.  I will happily accept a price range for that period.  

 If you want to make a contribution, provide some analysis.  Provide reasons.   Otherwise it’s just a circle jerk. 

Don't bother he's just a troll. A failure.

Yet, you are the one trying to troll me.. a crazy world we live in.

Yeah so you predicted bull tears today? Where is it? I can only see a green dildo in bear ass! You failed again bro!

Like I said, no one knows the certain direction of this beast. I'm also wrong sometimes, not often, but sometimes I truly am. If you have to be wrong, then you better be wrong when it won't cost you money. Although, I haven't seen any tears yet, we shouldn't forget that today is not over yet. Luckily, your eager enthusiasm and feeling of certainty encourages me. Maybe we'll still see some nice bitcoiner tears. Maybe we are so lucky..

So you aren't trading? Just bullshitting? Welcome to my ignore list.  Grin

So.. trading is done in this thread. The world is getting crazier and crazier..



124. Post 33831590 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on April 03, 2018, 11:02:21 AM
Jacques Bittard is a no coiner - put him on ignore & be free from his bull shit. He’s butthurt he has 0 or very few bitcoin’s. His inner depression, rage & hatred of himself manifests itself in bearish, jealous posts. He probably knew about bitcoin a long time ago & SHOULD be very rich but he missed or refused to take advantage of opportunities he had & the sorry, depressed poster is the result of his failures.




125. Post 33832358 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.50h):

A fun fact:
A long time ago, this account was first created for trolling. The act was meant to show a parody of a stereotypical bitcoin fanatic, with the character being over the top and two dimensional in it's stupidity and greed.
The act failed because the audience here were actually unable to distinguish this over the top character from everyone else here.
Saying things like "Everyone who spreads WRONG information about bitcoin should be educated by force, so they wouldn't be this STUPID any longer. " weren't actually out of place and were rather popular with the local crowd. No one actually understood that they are being trolled with and cheered with sincerity. This made things creepy..



126. Post 33844149 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

A fun fact:
Lower classes tend to think that one can exhibit success by buying impractical luxury products, with quickly depreciating value.



127. Post 33846509 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: Paashaas on April 03, 2018, 02:45:03 PM
Vitalik Buterin - "Why is this fraud allowed to speak at this conference?" (pointing at Craig Wright)

..People laughing and clapping..

When Roger finished talking (lies) 1 guy clapped. Roger: ''now you can all clap''

..Few extra people starting to clap in slow motion.. ankward moment for Roger  Cool

Roger, Craig Wright are walking ghosts living in their own fantasy world. Bcash is a dead man walking.



I have to agree that the entire bcash project was about putting a band-aid on a turd and saying that now it's no longer a turd, but something totally different. PoW ASIC mined coins all have inefficient and dated tech. The changes from bitcoin to bitcash were too small for it's existence to justify itself.



128. Post 33848168 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: B1tUnl0ck3r on April 03, 2018, 03:03:51 PM
Vitalik Buterin - "Why is this fraud allowed to speak at this conference?" (pointing at Craig Wright)

..People laughing and clapping..

When Roger finished talking (lies) 1 guy clapped. Roger: ''now you can all clap''

..Few extra people starting to clap in slow motion.. ankward moment for Roger  Cool

Roger, Craig Wright are walking ghosts living in their own fantasy world. Bcash is a dead man walking.



I have to agree that the entire bcash project was about putting a band-aid on a turd and saying that now it's no longer a turd, but something totally different. PoW ASIC mined coins all have inefficient and dated tech. The changes from bitcoin to bitcash were too small for it's existence to justify itself.

no the real problem of POW coins is that NO ONE in the WEST is able to produce a competitive chips to bitmain total dominance. for me it reveals something deep about the western cultures (or loss of it).

for me the real explanation is to ask to those people (water boarding and computer assisted data extractions, otherwise learn mandarin).

Quote
DAVID ROCKEFELLER THANKS MEDIA FOR ITS SILENCE
-- David Rockefeller, Speaking at the June, 1991 Bilderberger meeting in Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton and by Dan Quayle--

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended
our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost
forty years."

"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world
if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.
But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a
world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite
and world bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

by: David Rockefeller (1915- ) Internationalist billionaire, CFR kingpin, founder of the Trilateralist Commission, World Order Godfather
Date: June 1991 Baden, Germany
Source: Bilderberger Meeting, Baden, Germany




No one needs to produce a chip that can only solve one problem that shouldn't even exist. That is stupidity and useless waste at it's best. That energy should go into something that is actually needed and has wider use. PoW and PoS have basically the same security risks, while one is A LOT cheaper. You can make PoW mining look good to someone really dumb, who doesn't know that the real security threats come outside of protocol, from other tied in 3rd party protocols or software solutions. This is the way that coins are lost in the real world - hacked through other exploited software. Both PoW and PoS are both relatively secure by their own, since you would actually have to invest a lot into the market to ruin the market. It just loses anyone the motivation for an attack.



129. Post 33849447 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: B1tUnl0ck3r on April 03, 2018, 03:26:58 PM
Roger, Craig Wright are walking ghosts living in their own fantasy world. Bcash is a dead man walking.

And if the exchanges can wash trade a dead coin like BCash up to $1000+, just think what they are doing to the price of all the other shitcoins out there?

<<Shudder>>.

yes !!! of course they do ! the goal of wash trades is to increase the volume. it's can be dangerous to handle the price with wash trades, however you will experience that they remove their bidds as soon as your transfer to hit them is cleared.

still, this segwit and other lightning, I bet, will be used to censor and ban certain actors (think assange or more generally all the enemies of the globalists) txs. this is a real problem. bcash attempts to solve this fear.

Without wash trading, BTC would probably still be in double digits. Wash trading is the master of all crypto. Goxdollars were created because Karpeles tried to wash trade with willybot, but proved too incompetent for the scheme to last.
This is also one of the reasons why I find winklewii funny. They actually didn't know about all the wash trading going on in the market system. When they opened gemini, then they couldn't believe it that there is was no volume and they couldn't understand why. Was funny as hell.



130. Post 33850319 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: B1tUnl0ck3r on April 03, 2018, 03:40:04 PM
Roger, Craig Wright are walking ghosts living in their own fantasy world. Bcash is a dead man walking.

And if the exchanges can wash trade a dead coin like BCash up to $1000+, just think what they are doing to the price of all the other shitcoins out there?

<<Shudder>>.

yes !!! of course they do ! the goal of wash trades is to increase the volume. it's can be dangerous to handle the price with wash trades, however you will experience that they remove their bidds as soon as your transfer to hit them is cleared.

still, this segwit and other lightning, I bet, will be used to censor and ban certain actors (think assange or more generally all the enemies of the globalists) txs. this is a real problem. bcash attempts to solve this fear.

Without wash trading, BTC would probably still be in double digits. Wash trading is the master of all crypto. Goxdollars were created because Karpeles tried to wash trade with willybot, but proved too incompetent for the scheme to last.
This is also one of the reasons why I find winklewii funny. They actually didn't know about all the wash trading going on in the market system. When they opened gemini, then they couldn't believe it that there is was no volume and they couldn't understand why. Was funny as hell.

what is the problem of wash trading? I never understood it from a fundamentalist market perspectives? who cares if an operator trade with himself all day long? you can in a safe market always over bid or under ask him and get "trade"...

interesting topic... why is wash trading illegal?

Wash trading is bad because it creates an illusion of false value. If funds will be directed to somewhere that doesn't have actual value to the economy, then everyone else in the economic will suffer except the perp. running the scheme.
With cryptos, it is especially bad, because it quickly escalates into making up goxdollars or tether. This twists the value of things even more and creates a ticking timebomb of reality to everyone involved.



131. Post 33869335 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: mike4001 on April 03, 2018, 07:50:45 PM
The sellwalls at 7,5k are really strong.

For instance: I don't understand why someone would put up a sell order of 100 BTC at exactly 7,5k just to hold the price down.

Does he realize that also his own coins will not rise in value if he keeps the price down?

Bitcoin market will always be a little chaotic, because of the unknown.
For instance any drug dealer, who did tor market business during 2010-13 and got imprisoned for that, will probably have loads of coins left in cold wallets, waiting to be dumped. Autistic people, who live in their parents basements and have no conception of wealth, could now be bitcoin whales with a lot of weight on the market. That is why things don't often make logical sense here. Lots of people out there who are inexperienced in dealing with wealth.



132. Post 33873195 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: Lontonbit on April 03, 2018, 08:15:27 PM
The sellwalls at 7,5k are really strong.

For instance: I don't understand why someone would put up a sell order of 100 BTC at exactly 7,5k just to hold the price down.

Does he realize that also his own coins will not rise in value if he keeps the price down?

Bitcoin market will always be a little chaotic, because of the unknown.
For instance any drug dealer, who did tor market business during 2010-13 and got imprisoned for that, will probably have loads of coins left in cold wallets, waiting to be dumped. Autistic people, who live in their parents basements and have no conception of wealth, could now be bitcoin whales with a lot of weight on the market. That is why things don't often make logical sense here. Lots of people out there who are inexperienced in dealing with wealth.
Is this a joke? Lol




133. Post 33874003 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: B1tUnl0ck3r on April 03, 2018, 09:02:42 PM
The sellwalls at 7,5k are really strong.

For instance: I don't understand why someone would put up a sell order of 100 BTC at exactly 7,5k just to hold the price down.

Does he realize that also his own coins will not rise in value if he keeps the price down?

Bitcoin market will always be a little chaotic, because of the unknown.
For instance any drug dealer, who did tor market business during 2010-13 and got imprisoned for that, will probably have loads of coins left in cold wallets, waiting to be dumped. Autistic people, who live in their parents basements and have no conception of wealth, could now be bitcoin whales with a lot of weight on the market. That is why things don't often make logical sense here. Lots of people out there who are inexperienced in dealing with wealth.
Is this a joke? Lol



yes!

. o O ( imagination filling the rest of the scene ) Smiley



134. Post 33962308 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Sorry guys, but tears shouldn't come as a surprise in this situation.
This will probably bounce back to somewhere near 7100$ over the weekend and then tears will continue. You can't just hope a trend reversal out of nothing.

The crypto game goes like this. A group of people, who have the largest ownership of coin, are coordinating their moves in a way, that profits them best. Over the years, they have acquired over half of bitcoin available, while more then a half of the largest volume exchanges are owned by the same people and the public CEOs are just fronts. They can deficit the supply, create dollars out of thin air and if they wanted to, then drop bitcoin price sub single digits and actually keep it there. The last part isn't their goal tho. Their motivation is to siphon wealth out of people through the crypto game. The best way for this would be for a quick pump, followed by proper media coverage. This will attract gamblers who hope for easy riches. So, when the market is saturated enough with noobs, then it needs to be slowly bled and total desperation is essential on the outcome of things. You don't drop the market quickly, because this would create panic and would push the gamblers to take their money away. What they do is they control the price enough that there will be -20% slow drops, followed by +10% quick gains. Many people here are a little nuts from the religious aspect of things, so they keep parroting that this every +10% is actually a reversal. But not all is so innocent and a lot of the "friendly avarage Joe bitcoiners" that you see in this place, are actually sock puppets of rich and smart guys doing psiops to keep the actual average Joe involved.
The main target in this game are people who are taking mortgages and are playing with more then they can lose. They can't afford to be patient and can be easily hooked. During this whole year, they aren't selling because dealing with the current losses is too much for them. They are too emotionally involved and that clouds their judgment.



135. Post 33962669 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: infofront on April 05, 2018, 02:45:30 AM
Sorry guys, but tears shouldn't come as a surprise in this situation.
This will probably bounce back to somewhere near 7100$ over the weekend and then tears will continue. You can't just hope a trend reversal out of nothing.

The crypto game goes like this. A group of people, who have the largest ownership of coin, are coordinating their moves in a way, that profits them best. Over the years, they have acquired over half of bitcoin available, while more then a half of the largest volume exchanges are owned by the same people and the public CEOs are just fronts. They can deficit the supply, create dollars out of thin air and if they wanted to, then drop bitcoin price sub single digits and actually keep it there. The last part isn't their goal tho. Their motivation is to siphon wealth out of people through the crypto game. The best way for this would be for a quick pump, followed by proper media coverage. This will attract gamblers who hope for easy riches. So, when the market is saturated enough with noobs, then it needs to be slowly bled and total desperation is essential on the outcome of things. You don't drop the market quickly, because this would create panic and would push the gamblers to take their money away. What they do is they control the price enough that there will be -20% slow drops, followed by +10% quick gains. Many people here are a little nuts from the religious aspect of things, so they keep parroting that this every +10% is actually a reversal. But not all is so innocent and a lot of the "friendly avarage Joe bitcoiners" that you see in this place, are actually sock puppets of rich guys and smart guys doing psiops to keep the actual average Joe involved.
The main target in this game are people who are taking mortgages and are playing with more then they can lose. They can't afford to be patient and can be easily hooked. During this whole year, they aren't selling because dealing with the current losses is too much for them. They are too emotionally involved and that clouds their judgment.


Psi-Ops Agent #D359382 reporting in. You may know our plans, but you'll never stop us!  Kiss

I'm not here to stop you, I think that you are fun guys and I just want to play. Smiley



136. Post 33968202 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on April 05, 2018, 05:22:13 AM
Basically I'm thinking I don't know what I was thinking not selling at $19k or at $14k. I totally capitulated in spirit around $7900. We're now a thousand below that and I'm thinking, what will I be thinking in another 3 months. Huh

You weren't thinking you were greedy and you were only driven by desire. Probably because you are playing with more then you can afford.
My recommendation is to sell during the weekend, where this "reversal" will probably peak again. And then leave it be until everyone else are in tears, and then only start considering buying back in. You will have plenty of time since it will rest after the bottom is reached.
During bull markets, then you have to watch out for being trapped with FUD. During these bear markets, FOMO is your enemy and the majority of traders lose because they were caught in FOMO.



137. Post 34057195 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

This is dropping faster then even I speculated. I thought that you'll get some temporal relief to like 7200$ during the weekend, but looks like it just keeps going down.
The market has 7billion$ worth of annual mining expenses on their back, while very little new money is currently rolling in. So, makes sense.



138. Post 34126930 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

I hope you guys remember to sell on the weekend pump. My guess is that the top will be at around 7100-7200$



139. Post 34127403 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: Rosewater Foundation on April 07, 2018, 06:08:05 AM
I hope you guys remember to sell on the weekend pump. My guess is that the top will be at around 7100-7200$

Where were you at $19k when I needed you?!

I think that you wouldn't have listened Sad It was general knowledge that you sell during 2017 dec, because it was in a textbook bubble. Anything over 15k$ would have been a very good win and expectations for more was pure greed. Even selling at over 10k$ would have been a smart trade, and yes, even selling now is probably a smart trade.
I was here a month ago, when the price was at 10k$, and my recommendations to sell then weren't popular.
When people are driven by desire, then there is no point in reasoning with them.



140. Post 34127564 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: bitmover on April 07, 2018, 06:12:53 AM
I hope you guys remember to sell on the weekend pump. My guess is that the top will be at around 7100-7200$

If I sell we will hit 20k again on Monday.

Nah, that's just the feeling that every inexperienced trader gets in the start. They trade on emotion as the majority, so they lose together with this majority. This makes it seem like the market is specially after you. It's not after you, it's after the majority, what you can do is keep yourself distanced from that majority who is destined to lose.
And don't trade in single trades. Start selling a little piece at a time to lower the risk.



141. Post 34214833 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

So, you guys ready to go back down soon? Smiley



142. Post 34290183 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Took about 10h longer then I thought, but rest is on the mark. Everyone who didn't sell on the weekend pump, are greedy little pigs and they get what they deserve.
Market movement was quite interesting though. Lowering volume, thin books, strong gravity for sideways. Maybe we are lucky and will see a truly deep drop this week.



143. Post 34346059 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

It feels like a third of the market has just shut down. Sideways movement without any real direction, followed by sharp slices through thin books. The market usually looks like this when it is at the end of the bubble, so it's surprising to see it now. Possibly something brewing that hasn't hit the news yet.



144. Post 34424492 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

So, ready for a Wednesday dump? The price has levitated for 2 weeks already, without any strength to go up. I think that enough greedy little pigs have bought back and the invisible floor can be lowered.



145. Post 34426984 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.51h):

Quote from: TERA2 on April 11, 2018, 03:04:49 AM
yeah, it was pretty wild

not a thing you would really call "recreational"

I cannot even enjoy recreational substances anymore due to PTSD. This is why my charts are more accurate now than they were in 2013.

I think you were conned. I doubt that you will get a fulfilling experience through tourist channels. People who offer mass services for money with this, are in all likelihood con-men doing a cheap imitation of the real thing. People who can offer fulfilling experiences, don't usually earn their money with that skill, because that would already taint the experience. They offer it to those for free who seem interesting enough. The little details in things like how are the plants grown and processed, and how is the experience guided emotionally and rationally, will make all the difference.



146. Post 34500426 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.52h):

Bought eos, sold eos for a 20% gain, now bought xrp and will buy back eos later. After a long time, it's possible to have fun with crypto. Hope it lasts.



147. Post 34714607 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.52h):

I just want to say that I'm currently enjoying this upwards movement with you all. I'm not making any predictions here because the factors that are causing this movement must be out of my sight. But it is what it is and I really enjoy playing cryptos again.



148. Post 34715178 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.52h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on April 14, 2018, 10:16:49 PM
Have you been to Asia?
Yes? Came back from another visit to thailand just yesterday. Been to the flips too. What about it?
There just is no continuous aging process when it comes to Asian women (at least the good looking ones). They eventually flip to "old" mode once they turn I don't know, 80 or something.

When a female friend of mine who is half Swede and half Thai celebrated here 30 birthday here mom and dad was there too. The birthday girl looked 30 her dad, who is Swedish, also looked his age, but her mom looked like 25, I was amazed. And I have later noticed that some Asians seem to age very slowly up until quite a high age, at witch time they seem to age very rapidly and catches up with us Europeans.

I don't think that this has to do with nationality, but more about the specific family genes. If there are many generations who are healthy and active, then their offspring will be more favored to these traits.



149. Post 34809320 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.52h):

Sold 70% of my stash for a probable upcoming profit taking dump. Would be interesting to see this upwards movement get tested by some proper selling volume, would be easier to trust it then.



150. Post 34949621 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.52h):

I think that 7000 will be tested again. If it holds, then this has real momentum, if it breaks, then it was just another fun fakeout. I'm fully out for the time being.



151. Post 35880549 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: mindrust on April 29, 2018, 11:14:32 AM

If EOS (or the other competitor) convinces people into using their platform rather than using ETH, ETH will die.

Same can happen to bitcoin too *god forbid* if bcash succeeds.  Grin

When has that ever happened, that new, technologically more advanced and efficient products replace the old ones in some industry? Wink



152. Post 35883059 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.54h):

Quote from: mymenace on April 29, 2018, 03:01:15 PM

If EOS (or the other competitor) convinces people into using their platform rather than using ETH, ETH will die.

Same can happen to bitcoin too *god forbid* if bcash succeeds.  Grin

When has that ever happened, that new, technologically more advanced and efficient products replace the old ones in some industry? Wink


Huh?

EOS replace the system it is built on - Ethereum

Did i miss something?

EOS is not based on ETH. The initial coin distribution is handled through ERC20. This ends after mainnet. This is the reason why EOS will hype most in this year. If the distribution cycle ends in july, then that is it, no more new coins. This will fomo the crap out of the market before launch.



153. Post 37392646 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.55h):

Quote from: sirazimuth on May 15, 2018, 08:45:56 PM



Sorry, Tera - not a 'well-researched' article:

'Case in point, coder Peter Saddington, 35, bought a Lamborghini three years ago for $200,000 with 45 bitcoins'

And years ago, the price of a bitcoin was....?

not sure what price was 3 years ago (can't be bothered to google it) but it sure as hell wasn't  $4,444.44. not even in the ballpark.
"not well researched" is an understatement.
 these clueless hacks are such morons when it comes to writing stories about crypto.

I think that people who dream of buying lambos are probably talented in something else then investing. In investment perspective, buying a lambo is one of the most foolish decisions. It is difficult to operate in normal circumstances, wasteful, impractical and most importantly have a quickly depreciating value. It would be hard to take someone serious who drives a lambo and defines himself as an investor. A football player, lottery winner, drug trafficker.. sure.. but an investor, no way. People who are talented in investing and love the game, would probably have a involuntary nervous tick if they would buy and drive a lambo.



154. Post 38376759 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Is it true that bitcoin is failing because it is running out of greater fools?
Like I feared, BTC is ruining it also for more interesting concepts like EOS  Embarrassed



155. Post 38392581 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on May 24, 2018, 10:39:36 AM



Don't be mad, I feel ya bro. I also like to gain money without doing any work Sad



156. Post 38411481 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Kylapoiss on May 24, 2018, 01:15:16 PM
Is it true that bitcoin is failing because it is running out of greater fools?
Like I feared, BTC is ruining it also for more interesting concepts like EOS  Embarrassed

So BTC is ruining EOS? Without BTC EOS would thrive? What drugs do you take?

BTC is ruining everything Sad even old people are beginning to feel that there could be more to crypto then greed and greater fools. Luckily, we still have slow people and people who aren't retarded enough that their intellectual disabilities won't keep them from operating a computer. I hope that they will take on more loans to keep BTC price afloat so that EOS can keep doing it's 2018 thing. *keeps fingers crossed*



157. Post 38413711 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: markj113 on May 24, 2018, 03:34:19 PM
BTC is ruining everything Sad even old people are beginning to feel that there could be more to crypto then greed and greater fools. Luckily, we still have slow people and people who aren't retarded enough that their intellectual disabilities won't keep them from operating a computer. I hope that they will take on more loans to keep BTC price afloat so that EOS can keep doing it's 2018 thing. *keeps fingers crossed*

If EOS cant stand on its own feet without bitcoin holding its hand perhaps its just another shitcoin?

Bitcoin is the original shitcoin Smiley The whole crypto game is just one big bubble, with very little practical value created and mostly held up by high hopes and ignorance. I didn't get caught in the BS sales pitches with BTC when I played it, and I still don't do it with new alternatives. Just ride the waves of hype and have fun while playing it is my moto. Believing any of this is for people who invest in buying lambos Tongue



158. Post 38415043 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: markj113 on May 24, 2018, 03:53:14 PM
Bitcoin is the original shitcoin Smiley The whole crypto game is just one big bubble, with very little practical value created and mostly held up by high hopes and ignorance. I didn't get caught in the BS sales pitches with BTC when I played it, and I still don't do it with new alternatives. Just ride the waves of hype and have fun while playing it is my moto. Believing any of this is for people who invest in buying lambos Tongue

Yep, here's my investment alongside more precious metals than scrooge mcduck Smiley



I bet you feel proud Wink



159. Post 38415639 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: markj113 on May 24, 2018, 03:56:31 PM
I bet you feel proud Wink

Yep 2 years worth of hard work + a little luck trading.

May I ask in what field do you work in?



160. Post 38416611 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: markj113 on May 24, 2018, 04:01:31 PM
May I ask in what field do you work in?

I am a national project management lead for a very big UK company.

My respects to anyone whose work is about creating real value and developing the economy. Then you must also see this (crypto) as a fun game and not take things overly serious Smiley



161. Post 38418553 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: markj113 on May 24, 2018, 04:14:12 PM
My respects to anyone whose work is about creating real value and developing the economy. Then you must also see this (crypto) as a fun game and not take things overly serious Smiley

Goes against the grain here but I have always said for me personally I use crypto for short term gains then plough the profits into gold for the mid to long term.

In the future I see crypto being banned with state issued and controlled crypto being the legal alternative.

Most will disagree but no one has a crytal ball and time will tell.

I see that in the end, crypto won't go out with a bang, but with a whimper. People will just start to realize it more, that it isn't a miracle cure to anything. BTC will probably go first, because it actually tries to be a currency without any value stabilization mechanism. The newer generations will last longer, but again, people will see that they are just ineffective databases. But I don't have a crystal ball either, unexpected and strange things could happen.
Our investment logic and love of toys express itself a little differently. I get very anxious when I see money sitting still on something. I need to see it constantly moving and giving people a chance to create more value. For my lust of speed, I love cars that aren't legal to drive on the road and that are as light and mean as they can be. To fuel my vanity, I love mostly cars that are at least 40 years old Smiley



162. Post 38422532 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Robin,Hood on May 24, 2018, 05:03:41 PM
My respects to anyone whose work is about creating real value and developing the economy. Then you must also see this (crypto) as a fun game and not take things overly serious Smiley

Goes against the grain here but I have always said for me personally I use crypto for short term gains then plough the profits into gold for the mid to long term.

In the future I see crypto being banned with state issued and controlled crypto being the legal alternative.

Most will disagree but no one has a crytal ball and time will tell.

Gold has no future because of the upcoming power abundance. Right now it is extremely inefficient to make gold which can be done but to produce 1 gram it would cost you a million dollars so digging it up is far more economical.
Bitcoin is limited does not matter how much free, very cheap power you have you cant produce more only push up the hash-rate to astronomical levels. Free or extremely cheap power you still need a unit of measurement to contact business. And the other thing prof of stake or any of the other stuff the carpet is ripped right out under there feed if power or environment is not an issue.
Trust me its on the way and or in place.

I'm not a big fan of investing into precious metals with highly speculative markets, but BTC vs gold, I would choose gold. Bitcoin may be limited, but it is also easily replaceable. This makes it's value far more fragile.
With PoW vs PoS, the environment isn't an issue, but the cost of production is an issue. It's all about the numbers, talks about the environment is just for PR.



163. Post 38424190 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff_Original on May 24, 2018, 05:14:07 PM
I'm not a big fan of investing into precious metals with highly speculative markets, but BTC vs gold, I would choose gold. Bitcoin may be limited, but it is also easily replaceable. This makes it's value far more fragile.
With PoW vs PoS, the environment isn't an issue, but the cost of production is an issue. It's all about the numbers, talks about the environment is just for PR.
Gold's monetary utility is also easily replaceable... with bitcoin. We might see that play out over the next decades.

Gold isn't a very good monetary asset, since it's market is speculative and that makes it unstable. But bitcoin would be far worse, because unlike gold, it has virtually 0% intrinsic value. Stability is what the monetary system needs, because that is very important to develop the economy.



164. Post 38425168 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff_Original on May 24, 2018, 05:36:11 PM
Gold isn't a very good monetary asset, since it's market is speculative and that makes it unstable. But bitcoin would be far worse, because unlike gold, it has virtually 0% intrinsic value. Stability is what the monetary system needs, because that is very important to develop the economy.
I think "intrinsic value" is bullshit.




165. Post 38425540 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff_Original on May 24, 2018, 05:41:21 PM
Gold isn't a very good monetary asset, since it's market is speculative and that makes it unstable. But bitcoin would be far worse, because unlike gold, it has virtually 0% intrinsic value. Stability is what the monetary system needs, because that is very important to develop the economy.
I think "intrinsic value" is bullshit.


I am very serious.  In fact, maybe "value" is even a flawed word.  Something has properties, which give it utility, which can be desirable for someone.
Value is always subjective. (see "a horse, a horse, my kingdom for a horse").

So, you actually can't comprehend that gold has irreplaceable value in electronics?



166. Post 38426627 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff_Original on May 24, 2018, 05:45:33 PM
Strawman much?
First off, I originally specifically said "Gold's monetary utility is also easily replaceable.", already taking into account that gold has other utility than just the monetary one.
Secondly, I was talking about the concept of intrinsic value in general.

Firstly, I said that bitcoin would be far worse to use as gold as an monetary asset, because it has no intrinsic value, and that creates more instability. Now when you are telling that intrinsic value doesn't exist, then you are either trolling me or just confused Smiley Intrinsic value is based on the important needs of society. Electronics is a very important need in today's society. Telling that intrinsic value of gold is bullshit, is saying that we could very well live without electronics. Yeah you could. There are plenty of people living like that in PNG, go visit them and see how well their economy is doing Smiley

Please don't try to provoke needless arguments with me. While talking with markj113, I really felt good that I'm talking to someone who isn't a religious fiend. Please don't ruin this experience for me Sad Bad intentions bring out the worse in me Sad



167. Post 38428122 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oALKAh_bL5g
I hope that this lightens the mood Smiley I for instance am currently quite drunk Smiley



168. Post 38428717 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: markj113 on May 24, 2018, 06:10:48 PM
Strawman much?
First off, I originally specifically said "Gold's monetary utility is also easily replaceable.", already taking into account that gold has other utility than just the monetary one.
Secondly, I was talking about the concept of intrinsic value in general.

Firstly, I said that bitcoin would be far worse to use as gold as an monetary asset, because it has no intrinsic value, and that creates more instability. Now when you are telling that intrinsic value doesn't exist, then you are either trolling me or just confused Smiley Intrinsic value is based on the important needs of society. Electronics is a very important need in today's society. Telling that intrinsic value of gold is bullshit, is saying that we could very well live without electronics. Yeah you could. There are plenty of people living like that in PNG, go visit them and see how well their economy is doing Smiley

Please don't try to provoke needless arguments with me. While talking with markj113, I really felt good that I'm talking to someone who isn't a religious fiend. Please don't ruin this experience for me Sad Bad intentions bring out the worse in me Sad

This shows the power of gold as a monetary asset.

This is my Double gold Doubloon from Spain's King Phillip II's rein in the 1500's.

It still has purchase power 500 years later due the gold content.





Nice pieces, but aren't their historical value higher then the value of their gold content?



169. Post 38430323 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: markj113 on May 24, 2018, 06:19:52 PM
Nice pieces, but aren't their historical value higher then the value of their gold content?

Yes but same principle applies to old gold sovereigns for example that are over a hundred years old but only worth bullion values.


Do you even listen to yourself?  Intrinsic value is based on the needs of society....  
How do you call the needs of a society "intrinsic" to a piece of gold?  
And then you call me confused...

I thought he made that clear - industrial uses.  There are also cultural uses such as wedding rings and other jewellery, dentistry etc.

I'm mostly a fan of simpler metals, like aluminum, steel and titanium. I need to see it formed into something, this calms my mind Smiley
It's a pleasure to talk to you, because you seem to understand the game. Even if our views on some things are different, it doesn't matter, because we are able to express ourselves in a respectful and constructive form.
I'm not proud of it, but I mostly come here to troll. Religious people have always brought out the troll in me, and I haven't found a better way to converse with them yet. From time to time, it's a pleasant surprise to see that you can actually express yourself as an human being and it will be understood.



170. Post 38431593 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Anon136 on May 24, 2018, 06:29:30 PM
Strawman much?
First off, I originally specifically said "Gold's monetary utility is also easily replaceable.", already taking into account that gold has other utility than just the monetary one.
Secondly, I was talking about the concept of intrinsic value in general.
Intrinsic value is based on the important needs of society.

Says who? Intrinsic means an inherent property of the object it's self. So for example a gold bars refraction index is an intrinsic property, it's elemental makeup is an intrinsic property. The atomic weight of it's atoms would remain the same even if there were no one around to observe it because that is an intrinsic property. But value? In order for it's value to be an intrinsic property it would need to have a consistent value even in the absence of people around to place a value upon it.

You say it's important for making electronics. You know there are people out there who do not value electronics right?

I get that you are trying to point out a distinction between more abstract reasons for valuing things vs more concrete lower order production type reasons for valuing things, but intrinsic is just not the right word for that. It just confuses people and everyone starts talking past each other.

Most of bitcoin value is based on peoples hopes of it being more valuable in the future. Greed is a very fragile pillar in my book - it goes as quickly as it comes. Far more fragile then the need of electronics in today's world to stay competitive, or even when comparing it to the tradition of jewelry, then bitcoin greed is still a fragile pillar. And it's kind of ironic to hear from a bitcoin fanatic, that electronics isn't important to everyone Tongue And I already said that there are people who don't value electronics. In PNG there are plenty of people like that, go see how they're doing. The monetary system has one goal, and that is to allow modern economy happen. The economy creates value, the monetary system helps the economy to do so. And the best help comes from the monetary system that is most stable.



171. Post 38431874 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: markj113 on May 24, 2018, 06:37:08 PM
I'm mostly a fan of simpler metals, like aluminum, steel and titanium. I need to see it formed into something, this calms my mind Smiley
It's a pleasure to talk to you, because you seem to understand the game. Even if our views on some things are different, it doesn't matter, because we are able to express ourselves in a respectful and constructive form.
I'm not proud of it, but I mostly come here to troll. Religious people have always brought out the troll in me, and I haven't found a better way to converse with them yet. From time to time, it's a pleasant surprise to see that you can actually express yourself as an human being and it will be understood.

Those metals are not great for stacking though as they are not value dense if you hold the physical metal.

Silver is bad enough but you can cram a lot of money in gold form into peli case Wink


Yeah, but that is my personal thing that I told before. I get very anxious when I see money sitting still, so I like metals that are meant to be quickly formed into something more valuable Tongue In a way, I invest more into people then metals Smiley



172. Post 38432767 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Anon136 on May 24, 2018, 06:54:28 PM
Strawman much?
First off, I originally specifically said "Gold's monetary utility is also easily replaceable.", already taking into account that gold has other utility than just the monetary one.
Secondly, I was talking about the concept of intrinsic value in general.
Intrinsic value is based on the important needs of society.

Says who? Intrinsic means an inherent property of the object it's self. So for example a gold bars refraction index is an intrinsic property, it's elemental makeup is an intrinsic property. The atomic weight of it's atoms would remain the same even if there were no one around to observe it because that is an intrinsic property. But value? In order for it's value to be an intrinsic property it would need to have a consistent value even in the absence of people around to place a value upon it.

You say it's important for making electronics. You know there are people out there who do not value electronics right?

I get that you are trying to point out a distinction between more abstract reasons for valuing things vs more concrete lower order production type reasons for valuing things, but intrinsic is just not the right word for that. It just confuses people and everyone starts talking past each other.

Most of bitcoin value is based on peoples hopes of it being more valuable in the future. Greed is a very fragile pillar in my book - it goes as quickly as it comes. Far more fragile then the need of electronics in today's world to stay competitive, or even when comparing it to the tradition of jewelry, then bitcoin greed is still a fragile pillar. And it's kind of ironic to hear from a bitcoin fanatic, that electronics isn't important to everyone Tongue And I already said that there are people who don't value electronics. In PNG there are plenty of people like that, go see how they're doing. The monetary system has one goal, and that is to allow modern economy happen. The economy creates value, the monetary system helps the economy to do so. And the best help comes from the monetary system that is most stable.

No sure how any of that makes sense as a response to what I said. Huh

I think that this conversation stopped making sense after the attempt to make intrinsic value a vague concept in this context. It's like trying to end an argument by saying "it doesn't matter anyway, everything is relative". Could we just agree, that we aren't stimulating each other enough to keep this conversation going?



173. Post 38435338 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: markj113 on May 24, 2018, 07:01:07 PM
But the point I'm trying to make is, we don't give a shit what you own dude. Only you do. Which is probably why you don't have a friends. Or a girl. But I'm wondering if your ego actually can fit inside your house.

Roger Ver, is this one of your sock puppet accounts? Sure seems like it.

Married with a beautiful daughter thanks so all good.

Dont worry, still got plenty of love left your mamma  Tongue

Edit:

Just messing about - will now stop being a dick
 Grin

I find it difficult to keep a calm mind here, without often being a dick. I have an unresolved issue with religion, and that constantly creates the need to entertain oneself in a dickish fashion. I consider it healthy..



174. Post 38436179 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Anon136 on May 24, 2018, 07:31:56 PM
Could we just agree, that we aren't stimulating each other enough to keep this conversation going?

I actually mostly agree with most of your points. I just wanted to help you improve your argument by convincing you to abandon vague and confusing language. But it's w/e. Sure we can stop here.

The fault could be mine, because I'm currently drunk. English isn't my first language, so semiotics about the term felt a little out of context in financial topics. Still interesting question though. I'm just currently giving my best to keep my attention on the subjects most important aspects. Maybe we could continue the other subject some other day. I apologize for being too blunt before.



175. Post 38436298 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: infofront on May 24, 2018, 07:38:31 PM



What no tool vanity plate to go with it? Lol

If you have lambo, good for you. You're now part of the tool club along with Ver and CSW.

I have a paid off house and still millions worth of bitcoin. So tell me why I would be bitter again?


Yeah, it's kind of funny when some guy shows up bragging about his lambo and gold bars, when over half the people in this thread probably have a higher net worth.

Rich, poor - doesn't matter. What matters is if the person is religious about crypto or not.



176. Post 38437261 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff_Original on May 24, 2018, 07:50:21 PM
snip
No sure how any of that makes sense as a response to what I said. Huh
This guy just starts talking next to the point so that he can keep believing whatever he wants to believe.  Whether he himself is aware of this, I am not sure.
He acts as if he wants a courteous rational discussion and claims the moral high ground, but in the same breath calls people that make calm remarks fanatics.
Trolls gonna troll I guess.

I actually want a courteous rational discussion about the practicality of crypto and the difference between gold and bitcoin. But when the topic starts to drift into the subject of semiotics, then I'm not currently interested Sad
I don't claim the moral high ground, I have repeatedly confessed that I'm drunk, there is nothing moral about that.
Anon136 doesn't seem like a fanatic, but the subject he wanted to discuss about didn't currently seem interesting. You do seem a little fanatical tho..



177. Post 38438309 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff_Original on May 24, 2018, 08:08:15 PM
Anon136 doesn't seem like a fanatic, but the subject he wanted to discuss about didn't currently seem interesting. You do seem a little fanatical tho..

You know there are people out there who do not value electronics right?
And it's kind of ironic to hear from a bitcoin fanatic, that electronics isn't important to everyone

I missed your earlier reply in which you said you were drunk, so I'll let the discussion be for now.

I jumped to conclusions and possibly made a mistake. He expressed himself in a calm and respectful manner in the end. Bitcoin fanatics usually aren't able to do that.



178. Post 38614536 (copy this link) (by Jacques_Bittard) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.56h):

During bull markets, I always sell on the weekend dump. And during bear barkets, I always buy on the weekend pump. Very simplistic, but works for years already. Cheers guys! I'm drunk again, but we're experiencing a really good weather in this summer for our nordic little country Smiley