All posts made by Spaceman_Spiff in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 1998434 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: BadPenny on May 01, 2013, 09:24:06 PM
Chart time!



lol  Cheesy



2. Post 2494772 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 16, 2013, 10:37:52 PM
I simply dont understand why people still draw those lines on graphs.. all this time i have learnt just one thing.. those graphs are utterly complicated and completely useless for anyone without knowledge of TA..and all it takes is a single whale to plunge the market and make all the analysis useless.. why do people even do TA for bitcoin??


 Grin

Yeaaah i am not on the forum all the time like you sarc.. i have patients to deal with.. but seriously has any of the TA ever proven correct??

Maybe 1 or 2. By coincidence.

A broken clock is right once a day... 

PS: Obviously it is only once because it is a digital clock.  We are talking about bitcoin here, remember?



3. Post 2495035 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: crumbs on June 16, 2013, 11:30:45 PM

A broken clock is right once a day...  

PS: Obviously it is only once because it is a digital clock.  We are talking about bitcoin here, remember?

Not if you use one of these:

Thanks for the history lesson.  Hadn't fulfilled my 'learn something new everyday' quotum yet  Smiley.



4. Post 2497024 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: crumbs on June 17, 2013, 12:16:46 AM

Thanks for the history lesson.  Hadn't fulfilled my 'learn something new everyday' quotum yet  Smiley.

Sorry -- i'm into that stuff myself (the gear, not the history) Smiley

I wasn't being sarcastic, I genuinely found it interesting  .



5. Post 2587576 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on June 26, 2013, 07:32:55 PM
I really wish transfer between BTCe and Gox was easier.

Never though I would say this, but I really wish somebody could create Pegcoin, all the advantages of instant, decentralized transfer of bitcoin, but pegged to fiat currency value.  Obviously I prefer something with a limited supply like bitcoin, but for now it would certainly make arbitraging a lot easier...  Probably not a viable idea to implement though (not to mention the legal issues).



6. Post 2587715 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: byronbb on June 26, 2013, 07:57:27 PM
I really wish transfer between BTCe and Gox was easier.

Never though I would say this, but I really wish somebody could create Pegcoin, all the advantages of instant, decentralized transfer of bitcoin, but pegged to fiat currency value.  Obviously I prefer something with a limited supply like bitcoin, but for now it would certainly make arbitraging a lot easier...  Probably not a viable idea to implement though (not to mention the legal issues).


Ripple?

I haven't really looked into Ripple decently, but isn't it a lending system? 



7. Post 2603057 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

lol @ butthurt report form



8. Post 2617763 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Rampion on June 30, 2013, 08:06:51 AM

False. I recently requested 3 withdrawals, SEPA, 5 figures each, and they arrived to my account in 2/3 days.

Gox has tens of thousands of customers, if all the SEPA transfers had such delays we would see a shitstorm going on in these forums, while we still have $11M on Gox order book and trading goes on despite the low volume. Following my own personal experience, the delays are an exception, and I think if they weren't we would see panic, which we are not seeing

oh boy, you're so full of shit  Cheesy

Why? I'm sharing with you my own personal experience.

Then you are a privileged customer, I am already waiting for a month and a half for my last withdrawal, still hasn't arrived.



9. Post 2617834 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Rampion on June 30, 2013, 10:10:29 AM

False. I recently requested 3 withdrawals, SEPA, 5 figures each, and they arrived to my account in 2/3 days.

Gox has tens of thousands of customers, if all the SEPA transfers had such delays we would see a shitstorm going on in these forums, while we still have $11M on Gox order book and trading goes on despite the low volume. Following my own personal experience, the delays are an exception, and I think if they weren't we would see panic, which we are not seeing

oh boy, you're so full of shit  Cheesy

Why? I'm sharing with you my own personal experience.

Then you are a privileged customer, I am already waiting for a month and a half for my last withdrawal, still hasn't arrived.

I wonder why some wires go through so fast, while others not. Puzzling.

BTW, I'm fully verified including notarized docs sent by regular post.

I'm verified, but not "Trusted" (with the notarized docs), maybe that makes a difference. 



10. Post 2627033 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

I have to agree with the bearish sentiment, it looks like the floor is going to drop out under this thing.



11. Post 2627968 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on July 01, 2013, 04:56:41 PM
Get ready ... weeeeee




dat funny too  Grin.  Thanks for the laugh !



12. Post 2628018 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Big dump, somebody trying to do some technical damage here I guess (or feared another dump and wants to be ahead of the other guys)



13. Post 2628096 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Jaroslaw on July 01, 2013, 06:01:02 PM
Well.... Someone has a nice summer now i guess.

its me and im on vacation already Cheesy



14. Post 2629083 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on July 01, 2013, 07:48:35 PM
Well, I understand we all want to make our bitcoin positions better but it's still sad to see what we've became.. we supposedly want bitcoin to be mass adapted yet we are happy it's crashing and people losing belief in it..

Greed is some bad bastard, it could break our heads at some time  Undecided

The problem is that since there is a fixed amount of BTC, it incentivizes people to hoard it.  Which then causes them to panic dump it when the price falls.  What we need is a cryptocurrency with enough inflation to deincentive saving (hording).

Go buy Freicoin then.  I won't be joining you since I don't like to buy depriciating assets...



15. Post 2629250 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on July 01, 2013, 08:07:04 PM
Currency is an investment, why else have it?

Currency is a tool to make transactions replacing the old Barter system.  This is why all currencies moved off of the gold standard a long time ago.

The more I watch these swings, the more I realize we need inflation.

I think you are confusing inflation with volatility.



16. Post 2630129 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: seleme on July 01, 2013, 09:44:29 PM
People who are refusing to deal with altcoins, specially when Bitcoin is in trouble are dumb IMO. There are so many of them if you catch 10% of pumps you'll be good as much as Bitcoin is failing.

And why couldn't altcoins fall just as hard or harder than bitcoin (just like silver tends to fall faster than gold on the way down)?  Just because they might not have done that so far, doesn't mean they won't in the future.
You seem to be assuming that altcoins will take up a larger market share for sure.



17. Post 2630174 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: klee on July 01, 2013, 09:47:23 PM
People who are refusing to deal with altcoins, specially when Bitcoin is in trouble are dumb IMO. There are so many of them if you catch 10% of pumps you'll be good as much as Bitcoin is failing.

And why couldn't altcoins fall just as hard or harder than bitcoin (just like silver tends to fall faster than gold on the way down)?  Just because they might not have done that so far, doesn't mean they won't in the future.
You seem to be assuming that altcoins will take up a larger market share for sure.
Excuse me but why stay for long there? Trading is our hobby here isn't it?

I am not sure what you mean.  Are you saying you are just buying to sell to a greater fool?



18. Post 2630220 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: klee on July 01, 2013, 09:54:21 PM
People who are refusing to deal with altcoins, specially when Bitcoin is in trouble are dumb IMO. There are so many of them if you catch 10% of pumps you'll be good as much as Bitcoin is failing.

And why couldn't altcoins fall just as hard or harder than bitcoin (just like silver tends to fall faster than gold on the way down)?  Just because they might not have done that so far, doesn't mean they won't in the future.
You seem to be assuming that altcoins will take up a larger market share for sure.
Excuse me but why stay for long there? Trading is our hobby here isn't it?

I am not sure what you mean.  Are you saying you are just buying to sell to a greater fool?
I trade - I don't see fools or smart guys.
I ride the wave hoping I won't get buried in it...
I meant fool in this way:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_fool_theory

I am fine with trading, but only if I see the fundamental value in the underlying asset.



19. Post 2630359 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on July 01, 2013, 08:16:43 PM
Currency is an investment, why else have it?

Currency is a tool to make transactions replacing the old Barter system.  This is why all currencies moved off of the gold standard a long time ago.

The more I watch these swings, the more I realize we need inflation.

I think you are confusing inflation with volatility.

My point is that inflation reduces volatility because it keeps the price of the currency at its lowest economically driven price.  It gets rid of speculators and allows the real economy enjoy price stability.
Maybe this post is more for the economics forum, but hey...
If bitcoin would get as big as USD, and supply chains were completely payable in BTC, then volatility would be greatly reduced.
I can see a decreased incentive in lending for a deflationary currency (making only projects with a high expected return economically viable for lending), so maybe the economy would suffer from that.  On the other hand, people could save without being worried about counterparty risk or depreciation risk and could get actual productive stuff done with their time instead of having to speculate to make their savings keep their purchasing power.  
Truth is we don't know what a bitcoin economy would look like.  I guess the gold standard comes closest.  Was the economy under the gold standard that much worse?  Maybe the past few decades were better, but was that not at the cost of increasing the risk for a systemic collapse? (I am truly asking)



20. Post 2630648 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 01, 2013, 10:54:10 PM
Does anybody want to buy 200k paper Bitcoins from the Winklevoss aka Hunt Brothers? https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1579346/000119312513279830/d562329ds1.htm

Holy fuck-a-doodle-doo.  Did we need a reason for a sell-off?



21. Post 2630762 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: BitcoinAshley on July 01, 2013, 11:08:02 PM
Does anybody want to buy 200k paper Bitcoins from the Winklevoss aka Hunt Brothers 2.0? https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1579346/000119312513279830/d562329ds1.htm

So they're bailing out ... now ... that should really help with confidence  Roll Eyes

You misread.
http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/07/01/winklevoss-twins-file-to-launch-bitcoin-exchange-traded-product/
They are not "bailing out," they are offering shares of an ETF based on bitcoins. Not quite the same thing. In fact this is good for bitcoin as it could attract more institutional investors who want to be able to participate in Bitcoin on traditional markets. This is something they can understand and trust. Good old winkii twins; they've got our back.

Depends on whether they intend to buy new bitcoins with the proceeds.  If not, its an ask of 200k bitcoins.  If yes, then indeed, this might be something big investors are interested in, and it could increase money coming into bitcoin.



22. Post 2630963 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on July 01, 2013, 11:38:09 PM


GG, campBx now at $0.00

Someone dumped 2k coins there all the way to 0. Poor guy probably thought there was more depth.

Auch !  

Well, at least he made some other people very happy....



23. Post 2637199 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: MAbtc on July 02, 2013, 04:43:50 PM
Ok, we're back in the 90's. What's the consensus here? Up up and away or down below 80?
I think this bounce up was expected, but I don't think it will pass the 94-95 area. Then back down we go.... we'll see if 78-80 support holds.

Yeah, I think we are heading to 78-80 too (and fast).  Then I would guess a prolonged rebound back to these levels and some stabilization, before eventually dropping further.  (Obviously just a wild guess)



24. Post 2647738 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Jozzaboy on July 03, 2013, 08:46:12 PM
OH GOD the irony. I'm still all in man. Just reporting the news!

Stop being so bearish and go get a loan already...   Wink



25. Post 2647958 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Jozzaboy on July 03, 2013, 08:58:52 PM
OH GOD the irony. I'm still all in man. Just reporting the news!

Stop being so bearish and go get a loan already...   Wink


But...I...oh whatever. Sometimes I think you guys are just here to troll me. Ditto the market everytime I put in an order.

That was indeed some 100% pure trolling  Wink



26. Post 2648382 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Rampion on July 03, 2013, 10:08:28 PM
you smell that? panic is in the air  Cool

i buy now.

You really see panic? I didn't see much panic. But I'm expecting it soonish.

Almost ready for the big drop...



27. Post 2648469 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on July 03, 2013, 10:13:44 PM
I really am surprised we are not bouncing there. Lots of buys lined up behind us, but none looking to move into the sell side...

All the big ask walls didn't really matter when the bubble was going up.  All the big buy walls won't really matter now that we are going down.



28. Post 2648725 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on July 03, 2013, 10:42:04 PM
havelock is being DDOSED this time... I want to Buy....

How badly?

do i want to buy???
my leg is shaking!

I was thinking about proposing some sort of deal (I buy now for you, you buy with your money for me later), with a percentage in it for me, but its probably just asking for problems, I mean, exchanges can go down, funds frozen etc. ...  Doesn't seem worth it.



29. Post 2648761 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on July 03, 2013, 10:46:04 PM
Man, we are really hosing through the 70s.

Panic/capit detected. I'm looking forward to the bottom.

no panic as long as we are above 50

If it drops from 90 to 51 in one day, I ld call that panic...



30. Post 2648857 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on July 03, 2013, 10:54:22 PM
i'm calling bottom here.

Might very well be for the short term.  I am hoping it drops a bit further since I have some small buy orders under this level.



31. Post 2649523 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: TimJBenham on July 04, 2013, 12:33:00 AM

Does anyone else think that it is a little strange and inappropriate for a moderator of a bitcoin forum to be relentlessly campaigning against it?

He isn't campaigning against bitcoin.  He is saying he thinks the price is overvalued for now.



32. Post 2649573 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on July 04, 2013, 12:38:57 AM
Why is everyone proclaiming trend reversal?

Support at 82 and 78 failed miserably, we are now below 200-ema and we are two days away from probably more bad news from Gox..

This is bottom? You guys really buying?

its only me thats actually buying right now..

I bought peanuts so far (2-3% of my cash position).  More buy orders ready for if it falls deeper.



33. Post 2655493 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on July 04, 2013, 07:13:22 PM
In a sense we need a killer app of some type. This could be the start at least in another country. We only need things to start taking off in one location and then the organic nature of BTC (, developers and the VC's) can take over.
My concern though, with something like this is the volatility of BTC. That is not a problem if you are using Bitpay or the like, but for BTC to work in these countries I would think there needs to
be some form of stability, UNLESS the inflation rate there is more risky than BTC (e.g. - Argentina).

Can you imagine if this "app" takes off AFTER we correct and people in poor nations are locked into something deflationary and rising quite steadily in price?

I think volatility is indeed a big concern in developing countries, especially for the poor classes, plus the fact that they are in general probably less ingrained in the digital world.  
On the other hand, bypassing big infrastructure needs and probably less concern about financial regulations could make bitcoin very successful there.



34. Post 2662934 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

not much of a bounce is it?  Bigger drop to follow.



35. Post 2663416 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 05, 2013, 07:56:02 PM
27k BTC over at bitstamp, higher than the 21k I've seen the highest so far.

Coins are coming out of the woodwork.

"Extremely limited supply" they said.  Roll Eyes

I would say the supply is pretty well-known, around 11M at the moment Smiley .



36. Post 2664890 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: BitcoinAshley on July 05, 2013, 11:30:25 PM
You still only really need to deposit fiat to one exchange. You can get "fiat" on any other exchange by transfering coins there and selling. See, even with BTC at $5.00 you can still use it to transfer $10,000 from Virwox to Bitstamp to manage the risk of too much fiat on one exchange. Cool beans.
Indeed, bitcoin is by far the nicest way to transfer money  Smiley.



37. Post 2669294 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

*Yawn* Give us some volatility already ! I am getting bored and demand entertainment !  Grin



38. Post 2670824 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on July 06, 2013, 11:58:38 PM
Loads of fiat on the sideline and loads more coins for sale that are not on the order book, waiting nervously for that rally ... that may or may not come before their pain threshold is reached


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHM-z_rHz9M



39. Post 2672615 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: fr33d0miz3r on July 07, 2013, 09:30:43 AM
I can feel a Winkledump coming. Cheesy

BTW, how many coins do they have?

200k, but they won't be moving them anytime soon, see ETF



40. Post 2672829 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: blackreplica on July 07, 2013, 10:29:08 AM
Just saw about 3000BTC get pulled off the buy walls to 62.


Wonder if it ll become a lower buy wall, or an market order buy...



41. Post 2675294 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Kazu on July 07, 2013, 06:25:56 PM
But Dead Cat Bounce in 2011 was very large (much bulls believed that they were already at the bottom).






To be fair, we sort of did bounce from $57 to $166, if that can be considered the 'dead cat bounce.'

Think thats more like the 10 to 20 bounce, but of course this bubble isn't an exact replica of the last one.



42. Post 2675942 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

If anybody wants a laugh, you can always rewatch this piece of brilliant journalism : http://www.bloomberg.com/video/bitcoin-the-anarchist-virtual-currency-12Je7jeKQZmn~Hx1YaNitQ.html

Fastforward to 3:10 for the good stuff  Grin .



43. Post 2676046 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Kazu on July 07, 2013, 07:56:20 PM
If anybody wants a laugh, you can always rewatch this piece of brilliant journalism : http://www.bloomberg.com/video/bitcoin-the-anarchist-virtual-currency-12Je7jeKQZmn~Hx1YaNitQ.html

Fastforward to 3:10 for the good stuff  Grin .

Wait at 1:25 does he say that a bitcoin is worth $80,000 or am I hearing something wrong?

Now that you mention it, it sounds that way   Smiley.
Damn, I wish I was around in the studio at that time, would have gladly sold him a bitcoin or two  Grin .

EDIT: he might have meant "if a bitcoin becomes worth $80k, you can see how much those 5000 bitcoins would be worth".



44. Post 2676072 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Rampion on July 07, 2013, 08:05:09 PM
Not worried at all during the fork, I bought a lot in fact.

Yeah, I fucked up during the fork, thought it would prematurely pop the bubble.  Got really bullish when that didn't happen though.



45. Post 2682819 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: WeltMaster on July 08, 2013, 04:41:53 PM

In short because it's the most perfect form of money that has ever existed. Eventuslly mr. Market will recognise this and the market will reflect the true value.

Check out Erik Voorhees' articles if you like to reaf a clearly written explanation why Bitcoin is the best money thus far.

I agree, bitcoin is revolutionary. It IS the best form of money that has ever existed.

However, it is still in its infancy whatever way you look at it. For it to BE money it needs a stable price, who is going to trade with something with no fixed value or at least some what of a guarantee of your spending power down the line. The ONLY way to get round this is to stop all this crazy speculation that it's bigger than Jesus/the internet etc and actually use it as money.

Until it is actually used as money en masse all this volatility is just delaying it being mass adopted. Yes a bubble is great for bitcoin, for publicity and adoption, but it NEEDS to deflate and have steady growth in order to compete as money.

All this bullish sentiment that its value right now is in tripple digits or that it will some day be the global currency is irrelevant. Bitcoin needs to walk before it can run and with the only people jumping on the train are expecting it. The price ends up being 99% speculation and 1% asset, this only helps to stunt its growth as a viable currency.

And how are big companies like Apple going to use bitcoin as a currency when it has a market cap of 1 billion?  It would be the equivalent of an elephant trying to get in through the dog-door.  A big market cap helps the viability of the currency.



46. Post 2682834 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on July 08, 2013, 04:52:47 PM
Bitcoin = Currency??

 Grin

BitcoinDelusiontalk.com

I transact value with other people all over the world by transferring bitcoins.  If you think that's not a currency, then you are the delusional one.



47. Post 2682903 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: WeltMaster on July 08, 2013, 04:56:35 PM
And how are big companies like Apple going to use bitcoin as a currency when it has a market cap of 1 billion?  It would be the equivalent of an elephant trying to get in through the dog-door.  A big market cap helps the viability of the currency.

Trying to get straight into the claws of an un-innovative (no idea the Antonym?) company like apple is the wrong approach. We need to build companies from the ground up that USE the currency like paypal would, for example. Whether through adoption or creation.

That was not my point.  My point was that for certain companies to realistically accept bitcoins, the market cap needs to be higher so that when they put in or take out value, the volatility/slippage doesn't hurt them.  "Evil" speculators that put their money in bitcoin will raise the marketcap and thereby help bitcoins transactional use (although emotional trading with buying high and selling low obviously has a negative effect through increasing volatility, but I don't think this can be helped as it is human nature).  So good traders are actually the best for bitcoin :-).  

EDIT: And you are right that we need companies to actually use bitcoin.  Currently, only small companies that can handle the volatility can directly accept BTC reliably (without being speculators, like bitcoinstore.com), other companies have to use intermediaries like Bitpay (which helps bitcoin too imho).



48. Post 2683052 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: WeltMaster on July 08, 2013, 05:09:25 PM
So what, we have a huge market cap based around what? Its use to transfer wealth cheaply and quickly through the internet? Big companies are already heavily tied with the traditional banking system. They are not prone to change and they certainly wont for a 5 year old currency with an inflated market cap based on speculation. We need to build from the ground up. Let the companies see people wanting to spend bitcoins and they will follow. Trying to shortcut it is not helping adoption.

It's a pointless discussion anyway.  We'll just let reality play out.



49. Post 2683101 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on July 08, 2013, 05:25:09 PM
Bitcoin = Currency??

 Grin

BitcoinDelusiontalk.com

I transact value with other people all over the world by transferring bitcoins.  If you think that's not a currency, then you are the delusional one.

I can trade my TV for something else on Craigslist or anywhere in the world.  Does that make my TV a currency? 

A TV has value because of non-monetary uses.  Bitcoin only has value because of monetary use.
Or what is your definition of a currency?



50. Post 2684156 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on July 08, 2013, 07:22:28 PM
Low volatility is not a neccesary requirement of a currency. It will take a very long time for Bitcoin to become non-volatile. I suggest you get used to it. It's far better to hold something extremely volatile which is continuously increasing in value than something non-volatile which is decreasing.
A minimum market cap is not neccesary for goals such a Apple accepting Bitcoin. The market cap will automatically adapt to satisfy the new demand.

Investment-wise, I agree with you, but if you are a company that needs to pay its bills (in fiat), and you don't have a fuckload of capital reserves, you don't want to touch something extremely volatile, because you risk going bankrupt.  Bigger market cap should smooth out the effect on price of influx and outflux of capital, reducing volatility and resulting in being better suitable for companies.



51. Post 2684185 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on July 08, 2013, 07:31:53 PM

M-Pesa seems more like a rivaling currency than anything else. It already has millions of transactions daily and growing fast, bitcoin is becoming a gamblers paradise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-Pesa
.

i wonder how high the fees are?

Quote
Users are charged a small fee for sending and withdrawing money using the service.

The most recent thing I heard though is the government is going to levy a new tax on it or something like that.

Indeed, single point of failure much?



52. Post 2684545 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: MonadTran on July 08, 2013, 07:34:38 PM
It's funny all you fags trying to sway people into buying while we're clearly still in a downwards spiral. There's no reason for bitcoin to go up right now besides speculation, and that has already been done the last few months, too soon for another bubble.

On the other hand, there is no reason for Bitcoin to go down right now, besides speculation.

Actually, almost any act of trading, or hoarding anything, can be labeled as "speculation". You're selling bitcoins? Speculator! Buying bitcoins? Speculator! Holding bitcoins? Speculator (you are probably hoping the price would go up). Buying gold? Speculator! Selling bonds? Speculator! Holding dollars? Speculator (by holding dollars, you are betting against gold, Bitcoin, and Chilean peso).

The only real way to avoid being called a speculator, is to spend all of your savings right away, and go into debt to buy a new house, or a yacht, or a Ferrari. Now, all of a sudden, you become an honest hard-working person, struggling to repay the debt. Not like all those speculators.

Yeah, the subjective difference between an investment and a speculation is both the time you are willing to hold on to it, and the expected volatility, that's about it in my opinion.  Plus speculator has a negative connotation, while investor sounds good. It's more about the definition you use or finding the average context in which the words are used than anything else.



53. Post 2685171 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Wary on July 08, 2013, 09:50:11 PM
Bigger market cap should smooth out the effect on price of influx and outflux of capital, reducing volatility
Margin trading will save us! With leverage 100:1 price swings will drop hundredfold, to single percentages.

Of course, everybody knows that leverage is key for stability  Wink



54. Post 2685473 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Wary on July 08, 2013, 10:25:17 PM
Bigger market cap should smooth out the effect on price of influx and outflux of capital, reducing volatility
Margin trading will save us! With leverage 100:1 price swings will drop hundredfold, to single percentages.

Of course, everybody knows that leverage is key for stability  Wink

That's how levers work. Long end swings wildly, while short end hardly moves. On long end, daytraders put billions USD in and out, make and lose their fortunes, while on short end the BTC price hardly moves. Speculators getting volatility and merchants getting stability. Win-win!

I'll actually have to think some more about this one, you might be right, but I am not seeing the whole picture/model.



55. Post 2694055 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on July 09, 2013, 10:47:01 PM
Potato Technical AnalysisTM.


Is this related to Candystick analysis?  (the past month, we went through a "Red Twister")



56. Post 2707575 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: mrbrt on July 11, 2013, 04:50:44 PM
What is most troubling is the widespread belief that human nature is malleable; that somehow once people who have adopted bitcoin get to run the show that it will be any different. I am the first person to complain about the excesses of the current establishment and the widespread systemic problems in nearly every aspect of western (global?) society. However, putting a different group of humans in charge will not drastically change the outcome. History is not linear and despite popular belief, human nature does not progress. 'Science and Technology are cumulative, ethics and politics are recurring dilemmas' (John Gray).  This type of thinking isn't exclusive to users of bitcoin, but, unsurprisingly, there seems to be a particularly large contingent of believers in the impending utopia, borne from technological progress.

Bit off topic, but I typically get carried away once I get on my soapbox.

I think you have some excellent points, but it is important to note that we are not just putting 'different people' in charge, we are changing the framework by which money creation and financial transactions occur.  I believe changing a framework cąn have profound consequences.

By the way, theoretically, I would say that human nature does evolve, just very very very slowly, and only after certain "evolutionary incentives" change.




57. Post 2707603 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: crumbs on July 11, 2013, 04:59:57 PM
I'm not talking about spending as in the bare necessities like hookers & blow, i meant spending which could be avoided -- lending for profit, investing, "spending money to make money," the boring stuff.  I simply don't see how molecular believes that Bitcoin is bound to disperse wealth. (Bitcoin:  Champion of the poor.)  If anything, once you discount extremes (one person owns every bitcoin), nothing encourages spending like inflation Smiley

I believe the reasoning is that it would remove unfair advantages and wealth distribution to big banks (special loan conditions, cantillon effect etc.), plus the fact that middle-class families tend to have a larger percentage of their savings in inflation-sensitive fiat, whereas rich people can more easily diversify in the housing market, etc. .



58. Post 2707690 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Richy_T on July 11, 2013, 05:21:30 PM
nothing encourages spending like inflation Smiley
Why do you want to encourage spending?

Because the faster we use up our natural resources and pollute the planet, the better?



59. Post 2707778 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: crumbs on July 11, 2013, 05:36:54 PM
nothing encourages spending like inflation Smiley
Why do you want to encourage spending?

Because the faster we use up our natural resources and pollute the planet, the better?

Spending money is identical to spending resources?  Oy vey.

Are you saying there is no correlation there?



60. Post 2707797 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: dexX7 on July 11, 2013, 05:29:52 PM
IAS: I think it was you who responded to the bitcoin.de and Fidor Bank deal. It's even better. This is first direct banking cooperation in the European Bitcoin sector (or worldwide?) and not only in Germany. Smiley Just imagine.. a full blown Bitcoin exchange, backed up by Germany's bank standard. Fast conversation between EUR and BTC, no more waiting time to deposit or withdrawal. The ultimate dream would be a debit card which can be refilled with Bitcoin.. but let's see, how things turn out. Wink

Bitcoin-central had a deal with a european bank too, no?  Or is this arrangement of a different kind?



61. Post 2708005 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: crumbs on July 11, 2013, 05:57:48 PM
nothing encourages spending like inflation Smiley
Why do you want to encourage spending?
Because the faster we use up our natural resources and pollute the planet, the better?
Spending money is identical to spending resources?  Oy vey.
Are you saying there is no correlation there?

You're joking?  I can guarantee that earth's finite resources are not depleted when you pay for gold or my fine whores.  Or milk, or stocks, or other currencies, or art, or digital goods or pretty much anything short of commodities which you intend to destroy. Smiley


Right.....  because buying gold does not increase gold prices, thereby making gold mining more profitable, there increasing the amount of gold being mined, thereby consuming oil, extracting gold from the earth and doing cyanide leaching and shit.   Oy vey indeed.

PS: I like gold as a monetary asset, but I would prefer it if there was no below-ground stock.



62. Post 2708083 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: crumbs on July 11, 2013, 06:21:22 PM
Right.....  because buying gold does not increase gold prices, thereby making gold mining more profitable, there increasing the amount of gold being mined, thereby consuming oil, extracting gold from the earth and doing cyanide leaching and shit.   Oy vey indeed.
PS: I like gold as a monetary asset, but I would prefer it if there was no below-ground stock.

The gold i'm selling is 100% guaranteed to be stolen from senile octogenarians, never mined!  Btw, you're theoretically right -- as long as the process of buying involves any amount of energy, be it as insignificant as a gesture to an auction spotter, spending does deplete finite resources by contributing toward entropy.  But i like how far you've reached too. Smiley

 Grin



63. Post 2709285 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on July 11, 2013, 09:30:03 PM

And we have a winner !



64. Post 2709705 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: notme on July 11, 2013, 10:16:06 PM
Screw the fancy economy talk, where the heck we're going now?  Grin

To the right.... always to the right.

Nice one ! Smiley



65. Post 2715474 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: blackreplica on July 12, 2013, 04:18:09 PM
Fun as it would be to believe it to be true...I think the jury is not out on whats gonna happen next

My guess: we hang around $85-ish for a while.



66. Post 2716655 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: TObject on July 12, 2013, 06:57:40 PM


Why did the automated posts got so small? I have this new huge monitor for nothing? LOL

click on it.  It saves us some room to read other things.



67. Post 2717212 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on July 12, 2013, 08:23:19 PM
Hehe, keep it up Blitz! There is a Prouhon shaped hole in all of our hearts. You are making me feel whole again for the first time in a long time.

Just for you ... to fill a bit of that hole ... it just never gets old !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7TuFy0fcuw

I love that song.



68. Post 2717226 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Next stop: $85.



69. Post 2722388 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: dexX7 on July 13, 2013, 04:06:06 PM


Photoshop much?



70. Post 2722461 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Abandon on July 13, 2013, 04:11:36 PM

It's not photoshoped.

It's not photoshopped properly you mean  Wink .

EDIT: my post count is the bitcoin all-time high !  Yeeaay, now I'll have to shut up for a while and enjoy this magical number   Cheesy.



71. Post 2723640 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

My guess: we will break the downward channel, but we won't go much higher.



72. Post 2727891 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on July 14, 2013, 01:13:36 PM

Price stability (long term) is impossible without a 1000 fold price increase or a reduction to zero.
Indeed, this is BS.



73. Post 2731895 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Abandon on July 15, 2013, 03:16:43 AM
Max Kaiser:


Care to explain?



74. Post 2736645 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: sukiho on July 15, 2013, 07:41:14 PM
When's chartbuddy gonna return with the big charts? (I know you can click on them, but ain't nobody got time fo' dat)

Alternatively, where is (s)he getting the charts from?

I also vote for bigger charts again from chart buddy as I don't bother clicking the small ones and prefer to ignore him altogether. A good proposal was to make the chart at least as big as the minimum post size.


Also agree, I don't pay much attention to them, but do have an occasional glance, with the new smaller one that i have to click on its jsut too much work. All-in-all its pretty unnecessary and just adds alot o traffic to this thread.

If i ignore chart buddy, will i still get notifications when he posts in this thread?

I agree too, after all they are the most on topic posts in the thread

I am not really a fan of the big charts, but it's cool, I can just start ignoring CB.



75. Post 2742666 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Why do you keep saying XBT when almost everyone uses BTC?



76. Post 2742830 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: giszmo on July 16, 2013, 05:53:37 PM
Why do you keep saying XBT when almost everyone uses BTC?

XBT, BTC, Ƀ, these are all the same thing and you should understand them. The one that gets used most, will win in every day life.

Yeah, honestly, I think it's pretty clear which one is used the most, so having all kinds of alternatives only helps to confuse newcomers.
And bitcoin is confusing enough already if you are new to it...



77. Post 2743589 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: molecular on July 16, 2013, 06:26:07 PM
"mbit" will win Wink

Sure, if bitcoin becomes popular and pricey enough, I hope some incarnation of 'mbit', 'mBTC', 'millie' or whatever gets used.   Smiley

Quote from: Adrian-x on July 16, 2013, 06:32:28 PM
USD seems to be more popular the Bitcoin, but that isn't a valid reason to use it.

That's a different thing.  I just mean: if everybody uses "USD", I wouldn't use "DXUS" or something like that to describe dollars.
Anyway, I am not trying to be obnoxious, just want to streamline/standardize things.



78. Post 2748457 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: fr33d0miz3r on July 17, 2013, 02:41:02 PM
We have the new downtrend, guys.
3 connections

It's not down yet...  (might well be so in the near future), but you shouldnt sell your chickens before they hatch.



79. Post 2750405 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: notme on July 17, 2013, 07:09:35 PM
Having money at MtGox I'm as worried as much as the last time this came up, not at all.

Finally, someone with some sense.  It seems like this has become the "MtGox Speculation" forum lately.  So many chickens without heads running around.

Are you surprised people are worried?  Bitcoin services don't have a fantastic track record of being "safe and sound", and Gox is bullshitting their customers.  For me, it would be much nicer to have an official statement in which they come clean (for example saying: we can hardly process any payments right now, and we don't know when the business deals or infrastructure to provide payments will come back online.  But to prove we don't have liquidity/solvency issues, we will undergo an audit).

I really don't mind if the majority of my money can't be withdrawn to a bank any time soon, it's there for longterm investment/trading anyway.
But a company that in all likelyhood lies to customers in order to manage perceptions, that doesn't sit right with me..



80. Post 2750463 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: notme on July 17, 2013, 07:53:14 PM
I'm not going to get into this in another thread.  Their press releases explain the situation clearly.

The July 4 one in which they say that operations are being resumed, but still almost nobody receives any payment whatsover?  Yeah, very believable  Roll Eyes .
Whatever, we don't need to further discuss this here, believe what you want.  It's not like I am totally convinced they are broke, but I don't like the way this is being handled.



81. Post 2751957 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 18, 2013, 12:33:40 AM
350k BTC are going to be released to SatoshiDice shareholders tomorrow within hours: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=101902.msg2751536#msg2751536

Goodbye, triple digits.

Yeah that makes no sense whatsoever to me.  If the company gets bought for 120k BTC, then he won't pay 350k BTC to shareholders, it should be 120k BTC max.
It should follow then that less than a third of all shares is owned by the other shareholders, right?



82. Post 2752019 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 18, 2013, 12:59:07 AM
350k BTC seems to be an insanely huge number.  Huh

Fuck it, even 120k is an insanely huge number for a simple website like satoshi dice.  That's 1% of all current bitcoins for a concept that anybody can copy  Huh



83. Post 2752026 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: solex on July 18, 2013, 01:00:48 AM
Even 126k BTC is crazy for such a simple piece of software which has gone nowhere for months.

It seems we think alike  Grin .



84. Post 2752560 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: chufchuf on July 18, 2013, 02:59:00 AM
The bear case is yet a new run of mr smith goes to faptown-

there's an exchange of btc, oh noes this means everyone receiving btc suddenly wants to sell- dumpocalypse.

there's no exchange of btc, oh noes btc doesn't have an economy, how can we possibly be worth 1 billion without an economy somebody save my penis!



lol  Cheesy



85. Post 2753675 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Still bored guys?



86. Post 2858618 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: fr33d0miz3r on August 03, 2013, 07:20:43 AM

TL;DR: The main idea of this article is that Bitcoin will destroy the current financial and government system.

It's more about the social implications that result from that and enabling crime imho.



87. Post 2862339 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: Wagner2014 on August 04, 2013, 12:18:33 AM
Quote
PayPal has hinted
...
of course bitcoin is the future its on a matter of time till everyone get with the program, expecting more "Rumors"   Wink

Granted, the question is whether the future is now.

the past we cannot control
the future is set in stone

today is a gift

this is why we call it the present

who do you think you are? an internet philosopher king?

if the future is set in stone, none of this matters and today is not a gift, it just is...

... an experience.



88. Post 2872417 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: hlynur on August 05, 2013, 06:36:43 PM
˙ǝlqɐuosɐǝɹ ǝɹoɯ sɯǝǝS ˙ㄥƐƐ$ oʇ ʇıq ɐ uʍop (00Ɛ$ ɯoɹɟ dn) ʎɐpıɹℲ ʎq 000Ɩ$ ʎɯ ǝsıʌǝɹ oʇ ƃuıoƃ ɯ,I 'pǝʇɐdıɔıʇuɐ sɐ ʇsɐɟ sɐ ƃuıʌoɯ ʇou sƃuıɥʇ 'ʞo
you could push your performance to a higher level if your spelling style would correlate more with your avatar.  Wink
Cheesy



89. Post 2894148 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: gizmoh on August 08, 2013, 07:07:25 PM
War of the Competing Walls, finally also on bitstamp.

Can't we combine the two discussions somehow? Doesn't make much sense IMO to have two threads to do live discussions of trades & walls, when they really need to be looked at together.

Approved for a merger

+1 on a general Wall Observer
PS: Adam 4 president



90. Post 2942516 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: MAbtc on August 15, 2013, 11:38:39 PM
It'll be a while before SR isn't the defining characteristic of the bitcoin "economy".

Imho, "gold 2.0" is more defining for the bitcoin "economy" than SR is.



91. Post 2950948 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: S3052 on August 17, 2013, 12:23:32 PM
If Japanese people are smart , they can bring the arbitrage gap down significantly:

Buying BTC at bitstamp, bitfinex or other exchanges , then sell BTC at MtGox in JPY, and finally withdraw  JPY within Japan

that will bring down the price of btc's in Yen, won't solve the USD price from being high (unless it is somehow possible to convert dollars to yen at gox).



92. Post 2951063 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: bcdev on August 17, 2013, 12:45:11 PM
that will bring down the price of btc's in Yen, won't solve the USD price from being high (unless it is somehow possible to convert dollars to yen at gox).
You can buy from someone in USD using EUR.
So you are saying I can convert euros to usd in mtgox?  I highly doubt that is a standard practice to be honest.
Maybe people with huge accounts can ask for special service.

Maybe you meant that BTC connects all currencies in gox, but that still doesn't change anything.



93. Post 2951115 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: 01BTC10 on August 17, 2013, 12:59:15 PM
that will bring down the price of btc's in Yen, won't solve the USD price from being high (unless it is somehow possible to convert dollars to yen at gox).
You can buy from someone in USD using EUR.
So you are saying I can convert euros to usd in mtgox?  I highly doubt that is a standard practice to be honest.
Maybe people with huge accounts can ask for special service.

Maybe you meant that BTC connects all currencies in gox, but that still doesn't change anything.
Yes they convert currency for 2.5% fee. If I send Canadian dollar without a Canadian account they will convert to USD.
Oh, I didn't know that, thanks.



94. Post 2951999 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on August 17, 2013, 03:48:52 PM
Market is starting to look erratic, capitulation is coming.

You mean down?

Yes, enjoy the show.
I believe it 'll go down too, though I am not really sure.



95. Post 2953350 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on August 17, 2013, 08:07:10 PM
Right now it looks like whales herding the sheeple into buying up to the 115 wall.
I hope I'm wrong and we'll see 120, but for now this looks fishy to me.

It's like those videos you see of the orcas herding the seals into a trap to eat them......

Do they want to feed at $115 or are they after a bigger catch at $130 or $160 or higher ??
Are there bigger fish to fry ?  Grin
Something smells fishy...



96. Post 2974311 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: molecular on August 20, 2013, 07:25:05 PM
Some important info is expected to be revealed about the fed tapering issue tomorrow - what do you guys think the outcome will be? Will the fed effectively taper or not in september?

If they - against all odds - announce tapering, we might see a drop in bitcoin (and all other real assets)

I think immediate effects of macro-economics on bitcoin are still small, maybe after next bubble.



97. Post 2974588 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: joesmoe2012 on August 20, 2013, 08:06:45 PM
I didn't know we were playing baseball.

I'm out.

I thought we were playing magic the gathering, maybe i have the wrong forum.

We are, Magical Tux played a Delaying Shield, but now his resources are all tapped out...



98. Post 3014513 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: Wekkel on August 26, 2013, 09:27:14 PM
Is this going to happen soon?
What am I looking at?

A) Your computer screen
B) A bullish prediction
C) All of the above



99. Post 3016425 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

holy moley, that's quite a candle.



100. Post 3170617 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Off-topic, but does anybody know what is wrong with blockchain.info charts? 

Like this one with amount of bitcoin in circulation: http://blockchain.info/charts/total-bitcoins?timespan=30days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

Looks like there has been an error since september 5th.



101. Post 3170714 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: prophetx on September 17, 2013, 03:15:20 AM
weren't we mining at an accelerated pace the last few months perhaps this is the result of that? or perhaps there is some missing data for about a week or so.
otherwise the chart looks good to me


Lol at chart  Grin

Blockchained.com says 11.71 M BTC mined, which I think is accurate.



102. Post 3178976 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

I kinda feel like this is a key moment in the market.  We might break and retest the lows, or just blast higher.



103. Post 3179011 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on September 18, 2013, 04:52:23 AM
I kinda feel like this is a key moment in the market.  We might break and retest the lows, or just blast higher.

He says as the tumble weed blows past the empty saloon.

and where oh where have all the wall watchers gone, plays in the background.
Yeah, this place has gone quiet.



104. Post 3212636 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: chodpaba on September 22, 2013, 07:42:39 PM
We don't really need a chart thread here, anyway.
All it did was encourage circle jerks.

What's wrong with circle jerks?


Positive feedbacks are unsustainable.
That's how we get deflation ...



105. Post 3219995 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: chodpaba on September 23, 2013, 04:29:55 PM
I am beginning to think that Bitcoin is a project by U.S. intelligence agencies to cognitively infiltrate Austrian economic enthusiasts by way of educating them about how things got to be the way they are.
What lessons are being learned exactly?



106. Post 3287036 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

fucking slow exchange sites....

And why didnt i check the internet earlier  Sad



107. Post 3287096 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Nemesis on October 02, 2013, 06:17:55 PM
fucking slow exchange sites....

And why didnt i check the internet earlier  Sad

what? i thought you're a bull....

show your true skin now?

Who said I wanted to sell?  I bought some, but not as low as when I saw the first charts, just missed the bottom so far.



108. Post 3287420 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

I planned on getting some work done, instead I am going to bitch about how much more money I would have made if I had logged on half an hour earlier  Cry   Wink .



109. Post 3287433 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Coolest CB posting in a long time Smiley



110. Post 3287528 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: ZoSo15 on October 02, 2013, 07:08:54 PM
This is madness.  Grin

Madness? THIS IS BITCOIN!

Haha, knew that was coming.  Cheesy
Yup, thought it too  Grin.

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on October 02, 2013, 07:04:16 PM
I planned on getting some work done, instead I am going to bitch about how much more money I would have made if I had logged on half an hour earlier  Cry   Wink .

That sucks dude. I'm over 8% up for the morning. It would be worth it to take the day off and just trade today.

Yeah, I made 7% (in and out again), but I only played with a minimal amount.  If it had been around $88 still, instead of $108, I would have bought more with confidence.



111. Post 3287595 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: ardana123 on October 02, 2013, 07:20:40 PM
funny all the people in this thread bragging about their profits
i bet ya, for the same amount of people with profits in this thread there are people grinding their teeth in the shadows at these posts :p (not me, don't day trade :p)

I have had my share of losses too.  I admit them as well (well, at least some of them   Wink).



112. Post 3293751 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: SkRRJyTC on October 07, 2013, 02:20:11 PM
C
C
C
C
C
COMBO

B
B
B
B
B
BREAKER

 Grin
I loved Killer Instinct.



113. Post 3330829 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Wondering if we are really about to launch again.  I would prefer a crash prior to another huge launch to be honest (I want more cheap coins first  Wink ).



114. Post 3330839 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: Holliday on October 13, 2013, 04:04:34 PM
Wondering if we are really about to launch again.  I would prefer a crash prior to another huge launch to be honest.

Crash is so last week.

Looks that way.



115. Post 3331646 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Bam !  Bitstamp going strong.



116. Post 3332732 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: integrity42 on October 13, 2013, 10:42:35 PM
The move from $1,000 to $100,000 will happen faster then $10 to $1,000
I think you are getting ahead of yourself.  I am a bull, but BTC infrastructure is still abysmal.



117. Post 3333204 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on October 14, 2013, 12:35:39 AM
Bidsum up to 13.33M. I wonder if people are actually depositing on gox now or if this is money that was on the sidelines.

Would have to be pretty dumb to deposit on Gox.

Press articles still refer to Gox.  Not everybody roams the bitcointalk boards.  Plus, even some people of the people here actually seem to prefer it.



118. Post 3351682 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: rabsie on October 16, 2013, 08:22:21 PM
Bitfinex down
back up



119. Post 3362436 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 18, 2013, 02:37:20 PM
OMG look at the wall at Stamps

and here i am buying alts...
stamp just said Boom  Smiley



120. Post 3362697 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on October 18, 2013, 03:24:59 PM
How is it that Walsoraj started as a satire of Jaroslaw.... and now Jaroslaw has gone, Walsoraj has taken his place!
It's the same guy
Doubt it.



121. Post 3367214 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

I just woke up, WTF?



122. Post 3367938 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: mmitech on October 19, 2013, 12:15:34 PM
it is scary though, it reminds me of April bubble, a bubble is never a good sing, I would like to see the price stable at this price for more days then rise slowly again rather than rising too much and crash to $100
a bubble is never good for the long term health of the bitcoin market, it creates panic sell/buy which will keep most investors and normal people from trusting the coin.   
This isn't even close to the April bubble.



123. Post 3367983 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on October 19, 2013, 12:26:14 PM
a bubble is never good for the long term health of the bitcoin market, it creates panic sell/buy which will keep most investors and normal people from trusting the coin.  

You should not care for the long term health of any market. You should not care for investors and normal people. You should only care for yourself and for here and now and how much profit you can make out of a bubble if it appears.

There isn't a bubble yet.

It could be the very early stages of the start of a bubble, or it could end up not being.  I think the fact that everyone is constantly thinking about a bubble leads to more corrections and stability, in fact.  Bitcoin-ers are very aware of bubbles. 
+1



124. Post 3369584 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

I have to confess I was short-term to medium-term bearish around the $90-95 area in July, and I sold a decent chunk of my coins hoping to catch "the final downturn" and buy some more BTC.  That is starting to feel like a really really bad decision.  (Bought back a few some days ago because the charts were looking good, but on the whole still a really bad move).



125. Post 3369711 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: theonewhowaskazu on October 19, 2013, 06:01:28 PM
I have to confess I was short-term to medium-term bearish around the $90-95 area in July, and I sold a decent chunk of my coins hoping to catch "the final downturn" and buy some more BTC.  That is starting to feel like a really really bad decision.  (Bought back a few some days ago because the charts were looking good, but on the whole still a really bad move).
I sold over 20 BTC march 11, tell me about bad decisions.

If you have any left from march 11, you are up on 99.9% of the population  Wink .



126. Post 3369750 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.17h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on October 19, 2013, 06:16:08 PM
Are you new or something ? The price can fall far lower than it has so far.
I generally consider that 10k BTC can be bought or dumped at any point in time with zero notice.
A 10k dump right now would take us down to $155
and?
or?
elseif
not !



127. Post 3376379 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: spooderman on October 20, 2013, 09:49:18 PM
We're on the move again.
Where?



128. Post 3379026 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: alexout on October 21, 2013, 11:31:51 AM
hey guys.
Im new at this and today logged on my bitstamp account. Is there a decent way to read the order book to figure out what kinda price trend is ocming up next?
The wall charts that get posted here from time to time are the easiest way to visualize bid and ask amounts.
As to whether this can help you in figuring out future prices, that is pure speculation...



129. Post 3381517 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: Sword Smith on October 21, 2013, 06:30:30 PM
You are forgetting an important dynamic: Interest rates. When consumption falls, savings rise and there are thus more money to be lent out. That means that the supply of money for loans rises and the price for loans fall which is the same as the interest rate falling. That means that it becomes more attractive to invest with borrowed money and this increases efficiency (if the investment is sound) which then increases the purchasing power and thus increases consumption. Yes. Capitalism is cool!

Yah, but with bitcoin you might argue that it will increase in value constantly (not at the same pace as these days obviously, but due to increased productivity combined with a stable money supply), therefore just holding the coins without loaning them out is a viable option.
Any loan would have to have a positive rate that compensates for the risk of a bad loan.  Even if these rates are low, due to BTC appreciation, only loans that are able to give a significant gain in productivity/reward will be viable, thus the overall amount of loans would go down.



130. Post 3381571 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on October 21, 2013, 06:41:20 PM
You know, it's not difficult to buy something with bitcoin and immediately replenish your stash by converting an equivalent amount from fiat to bitcoin.  If you're worried about spending your bitcoins.
+1, 'bitcoins are too valuable to spend' is bullshit.  If they are too valuable to spend, it means the current price is too low, thus market forces would drive it up and fix that problem.



131. Post 3388170 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: prophetx on October 22, 2013, 04:11:54 PM
my personal opinion is that bubbles should be spaced out longer than the time period between the last 2 bubbles as it takes longer for new innovations to bring about new growth curves.  the time period between the last 2 bubbles was about 21 months.  it is been only 6 months and people are already expecting another bubble event...  
But so much has changed.
look at this tx graph  https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions?timespan=all&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=
the # of processed tx is a proxy for utility, earlier this year we got rid of dust tx and you could see the decrease, and now an increase which means that some new value has been brought in but we are not talking 10X yet. in the last bubble the magnitudinal (10x) tx increase preceded the massive (10x) price range shift
I agree with you on the fact that I think it is too soon for another bubble (although the current price action seems to disagree).
However, I don't think number of transactions is the only measure for utility.  It measures bitcoins utility as a medium of exchange (although people can obviously mess with the metric to try and influence the market), but not bitcoins utility as a store of value.  When people are convinced that bitcoin will be around in the future, they will feel safe to park some percentage of their wealth into a "bitcoin savings account", also known as "hoarding".  To me, this is a legitimate use for your bitcoins.



132. Post 3388184 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on October 22, 2013, 04:14:14 PM
I think it's a myth that Bitcoin's value mostly stems from transaction value or merchant adoption. The real driving force is long-term investment. Or rather, the value does stem from transaction value and merchant adoption, but not present transaction value or merchant adoption but future transaction value and merchant adoption. One of the things that investors do is drive up the price of things that will serve a valuable function in the future, since most people won't buy them now since they're not valuable for that purpose now.
So there's a complex relationship through time between store-of-value pricing and medium-of-exchange pricing, with store-of-value/investment being by far the bigger of the two, even though it itself is largely powered by prospects for eventual medium-of-exchange pricing. It's that kind of complex interplay through time. Nevertheless, there's a reason why the old holders don't sell much: they believe in the future potential, and they know that even if it takes years to get there the price would have to appreciate wildly fast to be ready by then.
You beat me to it  Wink



133. Post 3388299 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on October 22, 2013, 04:32:30 PM
You beat me to it  Wink
I think the reason store-of-value as a price driver isn't talked about more is because it's sort of taboo. To those who are less familiar with Bitcoin and its potential, it makes Bitcoin sound like a ponzi scheme the more store-of-value functionality is emphasized. So there's a taboo on pushing that angle. Of course there's always a taboo on saying, "Buy this thing (which I, uh, also just happen to own) because it's going to go up massively in price!" Nevermind that that's about the best, most generous, most helpful advice you could have given anyone at almost any time in the past four years; it's just not socially OK to do.
People also naturally tend to speculate, whereas merchant adoption doesn't come without proactive efforts, at least in these early days. So there's all around a large bias toward hush-hush on the store-of-value aspects. The problem is that people then get confused about the investment aspects and what's driving the price. But socially, that's not considered something you have any obligation to help people with, and people often aren't very grateful even when you do help them and even when you can prove they would have been wealthy by now if they had just followed your advice. The human mind just doesn't work that way.
I think merchant adoption is an important prerequisite to the "store of value" function though.  It gives bitcoin the initial legitimacy it needs to survive.  Once confidence is built that you will be able to utilize your bitcoins in a meaningful way, then it makes sense to save in bitcoins.



134. Post 3388430 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: impulse on October 22, 2013, 04:50:24 PM
Nevermind that that's about the best, most generous, most helpful advice you could have given anyone at almost any time in the past four years; it's just not socially OK to do.

I have been telling people about Bitcoin for more than 2 years, making them "aware" of it while trying not to push it hard, and recommending the, "not more than you can afford to lose" approach. I have always believed that Bitcoin is just too important to ignore, and has too much potential to not invest SOMETHING in it, even it it is a very small amount. Investing $100 at any point during late-2011 and 2012 would have yielded between about a $1500-$10000 return as of today. That's crazy! All in all, I'm sure that I have told no less than 40 people about it and not one person has bought in. It actually makes me kind of sad.

Don't be sad.  If you brought the story correctly, they 'll probably buy in a year earlier than they would have without your advice.  It takes some getting used to the idea.



135. Post 3388734 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: prophetx on October 22, 2013, 05:34:23 PM
an investment produces something, it has utility.
I take it you're not a gold bug?
i actually do own  some coins Smiley
Why?



136. Post 3394274 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: prophetx on October 23, 2013, 01:40:05 PM
read the first sentence of the first 2 paragraphs  of satoshi's wp:
"Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as trusted third parties to process electronic payments"
"What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust,
allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted
third party"
Is btc used for commerce on the Internet?
Where in the wp does it say we need a trustless asset class to invest in?
good to go back to the roots sometimes... for a reminder of why this even exists.
1) yes, btc is used for commerce on the internet.  The quantity of these transactions, thats another debate.
2) Satoshi isn't god you know (or is he? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=315953.0).  He/she/they did a brilliant thing, but it is not because some function isn't mentioned in the white paper that it shouldn't be used as such.
The only things that matter are the properties of the thing, how it can be used, and for which uses there is a demand.  



137. Post 3394301 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: wopwop on October 23, 2013, 01:49:47 PM
as long as you cant withdraw real money, it's going nowhere but up
Roll Eyes
It's a sad thing that you are making money on bogus arguments.



138. Post 3395417 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on October 23, 2013, 04:38:14 PM
What worries me the most is Gox is leading the pump atm. China and stamp are reluctant to move forward. Since Goxusd is stuck, this is skewed.
Yeah man, it's going up WAYYYY too slow!  It should be going up at least $50/day or else we're gonna stall out.  OMGz
That's not what he is saying...  He isn't talking about the speed of price increase, he is talking about which exchange is leading the price increase.



139. Post 3407979 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: Super T on October 25, 2013, 07:05:41 AM
This is a little out of date in some respects, but with recent events it may come back sharply into focus soon. I was curious to see just how much Silk Road was contributing to what was a strong underlying growth trend in Bitcoin price - and the answer seems to support the claims that it was almost entirely responsible (more than I expected, see below).
I doubt there's many people that believe Bitcoin got to the current giddy heights through mass adoption or genuine utility, so the next question is what happens to Bitcoin if the factors driving it up there disappear along with Silk Road?

Correlation != causation
This, both price and silkroad user number are expected to rise with bitcoin adoption (and thus time).  I bet there are other services/metrics that show a similar correlation with the bitcoin price (bitcointalk speculation posts perhaps). You can't conclude from this that silk road is the principal driver of price.



140. Post 3467508 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: Shallow on November 03, 2013, 01:23:44 AM
We are going down to $150 soon. The end is nigh
Imagine hearing that a year ago.  We would be so thrilled :-).



141. Post 3469430 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: mah87 on November 03, 2013, 07:41:52 AM
We are going down to $150 soon. The end is nigh
Imagine hearing that a year ago.  We would be so thrilled :-).
Tongue

At $10 that would have sounded like this sounds now:

We are going down to $3000 soon. The end is nigh



the end is near, last chance to buy some xrp.

Dude, seriously: STOP SPAMMING !  This is getting really annoying.
Yes I know there is an ignore button, but you really should just stop.  You are doing more harm to ripple than anything else.



142. Post 3480360 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: Voktar on November 04, 2013, 04:38:05 PM
Meanwhile, all the bears that have sell today, first day of the week at $227 hopping for a double top feels good, but tomorrow they will repurchase at a loss...


lol  Grin



143. Post 3489216 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Man, we are ripping today!



144. Post 3491164 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: Richy_T on November 05, 2013, 04:58:42 PM
From a somewhat noobish and and amateur..

The -11 crash came after that hacked account right? And bitcoin lost its real virginity
The april -12 came after a serious targeted attack that caused panic again.

Will next real crash (not correction) again come from something going wrong in a technical sense?

The crash at 266 was due. The DDOS was just the trigger.
Agreed on this, we had a freaking fork with a guy doublespending $10k (or something like that) during the last bubble runup, when BTC was at 50.  If it wants to go higher, a slow exchange site isn't going to stop bitcoin.



145. Post 3492109 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: molecular on November 05, 2013, 08:25:10 PM
I would eat my balls and lead a happy life everafter.


Witnessed  Wink

Molecular has created so epic quintuple-spend with his balls already, I suspect that all the transactions will be nullified and he still has them in 2016.

Multiple claims on my balls? So what, it's a good thing. Everyone's fractional-reserve banking and re-hypothecating nowaday, no? So why not me?

Even so, I would prefer multiple dames  Wink .



146. Post 3501537 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: Ivanhoe on November 06, 2013, 06:57:00 PM
Bitcoin report on the news channel of 19:30 in the Netherlands. About this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325351.0
Let the Dutch hype begin Grin
This is a very nice development, 5000 restaurants....  



147. Post 3501627 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: gimme_bottles on November 06, 2013, 07:28:50 PM
Bitcoin report on the news channel of 19:30 in the Netherlands. About this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325351.0
Let the Dutch hype begin Grin
This is a very nice development. 

also their german and austrian branches lieferservice.de and lieferservice.at accept bitcoins for payment.

Here's the blog post (german)
Cool.  Are they popular in Germany?



148. Post 3510042 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: navigator on November 07, 2013, 03:27:16 PM
It's extremely possible there could be no big crash this time around. All the people selling now expecting a 3rd crash so they can buy back in will be fucked. Most of the last crashes involved some bad news of sorts. Things tend to happen twice in bitcoin, but not a third time. Don't be surprised if all we get are mini crashes on the way up. It's a good way to take coins from the weak hands who don't know what they have.
I think otherwise, if we go up spectacularly, we 'll go down spectacularly (though ending higher probably).



149. Post 3510141 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 07, 2013, 04:02:00 PM
It's extremely possible there could be no big crash this time around. All the people selling now expecting a 3rd crash so they can buy back in will be fucked. Most of the last crashes involved some bad news of sorts. Things tend to happen twice in bitcoin, but not a third time. Don't be surprised if all we get are mini crashes on the way up. It's a good way to take coins from the weak hands who don't know what they have.
What bad news happened before 9 April 2013 ?

a fair question. well gox getting dosd made a lot of people panic, and if enough people panic a crash becomes unstoppable.

BS. Nothing special happened. Is just that after a speculative mania period someone realized a huge chunk of profits, triggering panic sells.

This will happen again - over and over and over. Is just that the bottom will be higher and higher and higher. Until BTC finally becomes the world reserve currency or it disappears for good.
This



150. Post 3511538 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 07, 2013, 06:11:22 PM
!!!! Subway! 10% discount! Is this real? Tongue
You speak russian?



151. Post 3511616 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: Gabi on November 07, 2013, 06:03:32 PM
Quote
There is a bit of a built-in conflict in these two requirements. To be useful in the $60 trillion global economy, the quatloo must be issued in size: there must be enough of it around to grease transactions large and small in all sorts of markets. Using the U.S. dollar as a guide (since the USD is the primary reserve currency), we can estimate that a minimum of $1 trillion in quatloos would be needed to become a practical global currency.

To act as a reserve currency, another trillion or two would be needed, as nations would hold these quatloos as reserves. (Nations hold an estimated $7 trillion in USD reserves, about $3 trillion euros and $1 trillion or so in yen, pounds and other currencies.)

But issuing quatloos in these quantities would remove any scarcity value. Thus the issuer of the quatloo would have to carefully issue more quatloos only when demand justified the need for more monetary "grease" for the global economy.
They have no idea how bitcoin works. Lol at they thinking that you must "create" new money to have enough of them, their brain still don't know the concept of "more digits after the decimal point". Lol at the fact that an "issuer" must exists

Jezus christ. -10 respect credits for Charles Hugh Smith.   And I already lost a lot of respect for zerohedge (a very funny post is this one: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-10-28/all-you-need-know-about-how-broken-social-media-14-bombastic-headlines , compare the headlines in this joke to zerohedges own post titles the past year....)



152. Post 3519547 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

up Up UP   Grin



153. Post 3519591 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: DougTanner on November 08, 2013, 01:17:32 PM
$342

We still haven't had a Bitcoin-style full-on correction/dump from this 6-day rally and I'm getting a wee bit nervous.

Yeah, we might be due for a nice correction here.  I am not putting any money on that yet though.



154. Post 3519673 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: CMMPro on November 08, 2013, 01:27:34 PM
Being a nervous investor and posting about it constantly helps no one.

Except for the fact that it is fun chatter   Wink.



155. Post 3519907 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: CMMPro on November 08, 2013, 02:00:32 PM
Hey if that is directed at me I'm the only one talking about the price direction and adding some TA....and NOT about my "feelings", lol.
Reading about feelings can be informational too, it allows you to assess the market sentiment.

BTW, if this becomes another big bubble, this thread will be swarmed by "nervous chatter".



156. Post 3520720 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 08, 2013, 03:21:51 PM
Hi guys.  I've been trying to avoid the spec forum, but I decided to break down and jump back in to say "hi".  I'm pretty optimistic about bitcoin, but this move is surprising.

Wow. This is a bearish signal indeed.

Guys: SELL SELL SELL!!!




P.D.: Just joking Proudhon, very happy to have you here!!
Lol, i was thinking of a similar reaction.  Welcome back Proudhon.



157. Post 3521311 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: thezerg on November 08, 2013, 04:15:12 PM
My wife bought when the price was £7.80. She spent £5k and bought 641 coins, worth about £130k or so now.
This was probably the 2nd best decision she ever made (after answering "I do")
I have bought a small number of coins from time to time, but my 2nd best decision ever was to buy a bunch of 5870s back in January 2001.

No man, her best decision was buying BTC, YOURS was marrying her!  Grin
Grin



158. Post 3521372 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: thezerg on November 08, 2013, 04:22:30 PM
The truth is that bubble 1 was more violent than bubble 2, (we went up x16, from 2 to 32), so I'd expect bubble 3 to be less violent than bubble 2 and 1.

Regarding singularity, is a beautiful *theoric* concept, but its painfully clear to me that nor the protocol nor the infrastructure can scale to accomodate such a "singularity", and thus I consider it pretty much of a fairy tale.

Anyhow, I will be obviously happy if it happens Cheesy

Really, I feel like we went from 5 to 266 in bubble #2.  5 was a long period of stability... in April 202 so that actually x50.  The only real pullback between then and the top was the pirate disaster, and that is easily seen as artificial.  That is, its a external event that could have been triggered anytime -- not really related to the trend.

And in my mind it has always been approximately $13 to 266, so yeah, I guess it is pretty subjective.



159. Post 3521490 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Well this thread is certainly alive again...



160. Post 3523288 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: haightst on November 08, 2013, 07:31:34 PM

Also, they can fuck up your brain...



161. Post 3530680 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: seldon on November 09, 2013, 01:56:59 PM
Funny enough btcchina seems to be the only exchange not at ath right now Smiley

China, Y U no Rallye?
Because they already rallied, and are waiting for us to catch up.



162. Post 3530816 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

$400 coming up?



163. Post 3530839 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: n8rwJeTt8TrrLKPa55eU on November 09, 2013, 02:21:37 PM
I wonder if this has anything to do with the resilience in price over the past 24hs.

Quote
Max Keiser ‏@maxkeiser

We are waiting to hear about a new MAJOR Bitcoin player news tomorrow... could boost price guidance.

https://twitter.com/maxkeiser/status/399173865026224128


I pay very little attention to whatever Max Keiser has to say anymore.  He was screaming Buy Buy Buy as a madmen when silver was approaching 50 bucks.



164. Post 3530858 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: barbs on November 09, 2013, 02:24:15 PM
So I sold 1 BTC at 350 yesterday ...

..... on gox, and its gone up by 40+$ in 24h

Yeah, against my better judgement, I sold 2% of my coins yesterday trying to play the dip.  It missed my buy target by <5$.  Cry  I am glad I bought them back earlier today.



165. Post 3532402 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Sheesh, are we still below 400?  *yawn*



166. Post 3550194 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: rampantparanoia on November 11, 2013, 05:08:12 PM
DDDOS

The attackers must have sold, seen the trend is holding and are now implementing a Desperation Distribution Denial of Service Attack

omg DDDoS... head explodes
It's the weaker version of DDDDOS.  Wink



167. Post 3567992 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

$400  Cool



168. Post 3574025 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: humanitee on November 13, 2013, 10:13:18 PM
I just want to note that your profile says--> "activity: 420"   Smiley



169. Post 3580627 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: gizmoh on November 14, 2013, 02:19:15 PM
I have the impression the rocket is stalling Embarrassed
One whale decides to dump and Weeeee it goes..
It's outrageous that the value hasn't increased 8% today ! 
 Wink



170. Post 3582122 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Seems like a nice level to take a breather.  
$500 (gox) in the next 2 days !   Wink



171. Post 3585983 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 14, 2013, 10:15:33 PM

What law in what country says that someone wholly or partly has to use bitcoin?

It's obvious you misunderstand the full definition of "fiat".  Fiat can be a government issued currency but it also is defined as a currency with no intrinsic value.  Bitcoin, like USD, only has value because we agree that it does.  Thus Bitcoin is simply another form of fiat currency.  Bitcoin though, is not debt based.  So thats good.

"Value" is always subjective.  "Intrinsic value" is bullshit.  The only characteristics that things have for sure are properties, and one can debate how useful or valuable these properties are.



172. Post 3586492 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 15, 2013, 12:51:38 AM
We're moving again.
Looks pretty darn stable to me.



173. Post 3586590 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Sentiment seems terrible today.  We are hovering around an all-time high, and a lot of people are acting as if we just had a crash, or that this is definitely the top....



174. Post 3587091 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

To me, this thread is the equivalent of a bar.  Except the bar is filled with people who love to talk about bitcoin  Smiley .



175. Post 3587101 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: dwdoc on November 15, 2013, 02:25:14 AM
To me, this thread is the equivalent of a bar.  Except the bar is filled with people who love to talk about bitcoin  Smiley .

Come here often?
Yes, why?



176. Post 3590375 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

up we goes



177. Post 3596846 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on November 15, 2013, 11:23:06 PM
And here we go. My prediction; large sell off ($350) followed by a prop up the market buy ($400) then massive sell to shake the weak hands and get their coins cheap ($215)

Called this yesterday.
...  We didn't even go below $400 (yet?).  Don't you think it is a little early to start bear-boasting?



178. Post 3600584 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: camolist on November 16, 2013, 10:38:50 AM
https://bitfinex.com/exchange
"Bitcoin last price: $441.2500"
"Not enough USD reserve on Bitstamp, you cannot buy on Bitstamp at the moment"

when do their deposits make it to bitstamp???

sell to coinbase price @ $440 (minus 1% fee)
they make deposits all the time, but can't keep up with demand.  I reckon you'll have to wait till monday for the next batch.



179. Post 3600618 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: TERA on November 16, 2013, 10:49:20 AM
If you know could know exactly when bitstamp would come back online to bitfinex then it would make for a great shorting opportunity.
I would do arbitraging instead of shorting, but hardly worth it due to trading fees.  Percentagewise the price difference is still small.



180. Post 3600628 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: TERA on November 16, 2013, 10:54:10 AM
If you know could know exactly when bitstamp would come back online to bitfinex then it would make for a great shorting opportunity.
I would do arbitraging instead of shorting, but hardly worth it due to trading fees.  Percentagewise the price difference is still small.
I have seen up to a 10% difference when it happens.
oh, ok



181. Post 3600827 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on November 15, 2013, 11:23:06 PM
And here we go. My prediction; large sell off ($350) followed by a prop up the market buy ($400) then massive sell to shake the weak hands and get their coins cheap ($215)

Called this yesterday.
great call !  Grin



182. Post 3601515 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 16, 2013, 01:21:43 PM
I don't trade on traditional markets, so I'm just wondering the following. Take for instance Google stock, right now it's floating around 1000$. I can't imagine the Google stock has the same shitty market depth bitcoin has, e.g. 1000 bitcoins (or 1000 shares) dropping the price by 40$. Why is it that bitcoin has such bad market depth? The price keeps going up but a few big dumps could drop the price back to the low 300's. I can't imagine the same thing happening to Google stock.
Traditional markets lie.

They let people trade with assets they don't actually have.

Soon enough, Wall Street will get involved and play fractional reserve games with Bitcoin trading.

When that happens just remember - only bitcoins that are in a wallet whose private keys you exclusively control are real. Everything else is just promises back by (potentially) nothing at all.
The beauty of bitcoin is that it is so easy to take "physical" possession of your coins.  Fractional reserve games can be dismantled very quickly when there is distrust.



183. Post 3601565 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.23h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 16, 2013, 12:28:15 PM
I don't trade on traditional markets, so I'm just wondering the following. Take for instance Google stock, right now it's floating around 1000$. I can't imagine the Google stock has the same shitty market depth bitcoin has, e.g. 1000 bitcoins (or 1000 shares) dropping the price by 40$. Why is it that bitcoin has such bad market depth? The price keeps going up but a few big dumps could drop the price back to the low 300's. I can't imagine the same thing happening to Google stock.
Because bitcoin has the capacity for both much more growth, as well as the possibility that it tanks overnight .

Quote from: TERA on November 16, 2013, 01:34:59 PM
Auctually the volume needed to sustain a given price level is based on bitcoins, not dollars. If the price is four times higher than there needs to be four times as much usd volume, which is the same amount of bitcoin volume.
There is no volume needed to sustain a certain price.  If nobody buys, and nobody sells, prices stay stable.



184. Post 3610676 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: aminorex on November 17, 2013, 09:55:32 AM
A credible assassination market would clean up politics.
Yes, when people disagree with each other they should just kill each other off...  Roll Eyes



185. Post 3610803 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Come on $500 gox !



186. Post 3611114 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: seldon on November 17, 2013, 11:23:48 AM
What will we see first: 500goxusd or 3000btccny? And what will fall first?

My bets are on the chinese.
I think so too.
Ask wall after 3000 CNY is very low by the way, but looking at walls is like reading tea leaves i guess.



187. Post 3611129 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 17, 2013, 11:28:41 AM
What will we see first: 500goxusd or 3000btccny? And what will fall first?

My bets are on the chinese.
I think so too.
Ask wall after 3000 CNY is very low by the way, but hey, looking at walls is like reading tea leaves i guess.

I thought you were short?
Me?  No way.  The only big mistake I made was selling too much coins this summer hoping for 'final capitulation of bubble deflation' and more cheap coins.  Thus, I would have appreciated a serious dip prior to this runup, but I still have enough coins to make this price appreciation a pleasant experience  Smiley .



188. Post 3611201 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: haightst on November 17, 2013, 11:41:28 AM
What will we see first: 500goxusd or 3000btccny? And what will fall first?

My bets are on the chinese.
I think so too.
Ask wall after 3000 CNY is very low by the way, but hey, looking at walls is like reading tea leaves i guess.

I thought you were short?
Me?  No way.  The only big mistake I made was selling too much coins this summer hoping for 'final capitulation of bubble deflation' and more cheap coins.  Thus, I would have appreciated a serious dip prior to this runup, but I still have enough coins to make this price appreciation a pleasant experience  Smiley .

yeah man I was not feeling it this summer either ~but now looks like we have a monster breaking loose!!!  Cool 1000+ here we come! *imho!*
I honestly didn't see us going into another price runup this fast.  But when we were passing $200, I recognized my mistake and (partially) bought in again.  Another case of "buy and hold is better than trading".



189. Post 3611227 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

$500!!!!

looks like the chinese were later after all...



190. Post 3611493 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on November 17, 2013, 12:23:37 PM
You are familiar with their position on WoW gold?
I am not, please elaborate.



191. Post 3611548 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Taxidermista on November 17, 2013, 12:31:53 PM
We've just reach 350€ at Bitstamp. Fucking awesome...
does stamp trade in euros?



192. Post 3612809 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: macsga on November 17, 2013, 02:33:52 PM

nice one  Grin

EDIT: I adapted it a bit.




193. Post 3613265 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: RoadStress on November 17, 2013, 04:03:44 PM


Will someone explain to me the ChartBuddy? Search function isn't helping me.
kay got it, shame on me for expecting to get it spoon-fed.  Tongue


English? Still nobody told me about the ChartBuddy.

The green lines show the bids (how many bitcoins people are willling to buy at what price, cumulative starting from highest price), the red lines show the asks (how many bitcoins people are willing to sell at what price).
The difference between Chartbuddy and the other "wall" pictures is that chartbuddy shows the difference over time (hence the 3D image).
The bitcoin price is the place where bids and asks meet, so the "valley".



194. Post 3615371 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: MaxBTC1 on November 17, 2013, 08:09:33 PM
Amazing how a thread can have so many post

Great work!

Yeh I was wondering, if this the longest thread in this forums history?  Then that got me thinking, on what is the the longest thread in any forum ever lol.  I wonder.  Anyone know?
And this is actually the continuation of the previous "mtgox wall observer" thread, which was also ridiculously long.



195. Post 3615384 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: explorer on November 17, 2013, 08:13:00 PM
This is what you get when you can't withdraw  Grin
Pregnant?
lol



196. Post 3615451 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: theonewhowaskazu on November 17, 2013, 08:15:37 PM
Thesis:

The future price of bitcoin is proportional to the number of jokes made on the most active Wall Observer thread.
Thesis: market exuberance is positively correlated with the number of gifs and jpegs on this thread.  Sexually loaded pictures count double.
Conclusion: we still have a ways to go in this bubble.



197. Post 3616614 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

What time is the hearing tomorrow?



198. Post 3616708 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

$530 gox  Shocked



199. Post 3617305 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: knight22 on November 17, 2013, 11:37:01 PM
An interesting thought struck me earlier - now that the majority of my personal wealth lies with bitcoin, what would be the best and most secure way of leaving them in a will?!?  If I were to get run over by a truck tomorrow, my coins would probably be lost.  None of my family or friends would have any idea what to do with paper wallets either  Shocked

You should write a treasure map with shady and mysterious instructions of how to get access to your bitcoin. That would be awesome  Cheesy
+1



200. Post 3621550 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

wow, looks like I missed some excitement.



201. Post 3621620 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 18, 2013, 09:33:30 AM
wow, looks like I missed some excitement.
Get back to driving the rocket. Also take Humantee with you.
Sure thing boss  Wink.





202. Post 3621724 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Searing on November 18, 2013, 09:49:56 AM
crap its only been 1 month of this for me no wonder everyone on here is insane



203. Post 3622731 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on November 18, 2013, 12:05:29 PM
From bloomberg:

"The Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission are telling a U.S. Senate committee that Bitcoins are legitimate financial instruments, boosting prospects for wider acceptance of the virtual currency.
Representatives from the agencies told the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs ahead of a hearing today that the digital money offers benefits and carries risks, like any other online-payment system, according to letters they released before the meeting."

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-18/u-s-agencies-to-say-bitcoins-offer-legitimate-benefits.html

As ridiculously high (and ridiculously fast as we got there), this is astoundingly good news. If the US Government gives Bitcoin a go ahead, we can bump up our mass adoption plans.
Depends a bit on how industry-killing the regulations are or not.



204. Post 3623839 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 18, 2013, 02:21:10 PM
What the hell is causing that spread? It's not just Gox too, China is even higher.

We still live in the wild west! Smiley
FBI likes Stamp to liquidate their coins  Cheesy. jk



205. Post 3624174 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: mestar on November 18, 2013, 02:55:25 PM
hey its "virtual gold"
Bitcoin is not like gold at all, in the aspect that gold does not have price check built in the same way Bitcoin has.  Bitcoin network uses electrical power, and this power has cost.  At 600,  around 2 million usd daily, can pass trough exchanges pushing the price down.  So, we need 2 million daily just to keep the Bitcoin price at the same level.  So, 2 million of fresh sucker money daily.
You do realize there is this thing going on that is called "gold mining"?



206. Post 3624308 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: mestar on November 18, 2013, 03:08:04 PM
You do realize there is this thing going on that is called "gold mining"?

If all gold mining in the world stopped, gold would still be useful, so it can function with "zero cost".  Not so with Bitcoin, Bitcoin will always have costs to keep it running, and this cost is an almost direct function of its price on the exchanges.  

For now, due to inflation.  How about when miners have to survive on transaction fees alone?  If most transactions would occur off-chain, wouldn't that strongly reduce the operating costs?  (I am having a hard time predicting how this will evolve.)
But as noted by 600 watt, gold storage and transportation costs money too.



207. Post 3624341 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: mestar on November 18, 2013, 03:11:32 PM
It is completely like gold but better.
Gold does not have a price point at which all the electrical power generated in the world is used by gold.  Bitcoin has such a price point.
Bitcoin would never get to such a price point (and the electrical power would get more expensive).



208. Post 3624377 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 18, 2013, 03:14:22 PM
It is completely like gold but better.


Gold does not have a price point at which all the electrical power generated in the world is used by gold.  Bitcoin has such a price point.

Dude electricity is irrelevant. Maintenance cost is relevant. For gold that cost is way higher (anti-counterfeiting measures, transporting, anti-scraping measures, storing, securing) than Bitcoin mining which also accomplishes all these things better.

People that keep focusing on electricity truly don't get it. Do yourself a favour and read the articles by Erik Voorhees I linked.
I don't think electricity is irrelevant.  The faster and higher bitcoin goes up in price, the more electricity will be consumed in these "high btc inflation" times.  If bitcoin reaches $100k overnight, the resulting mining activity (and energy consumption) will be huge, and largely for nothing, because past a certain point the increased security is just overkill.  But I guess that is the price to pay for the new monetary system.



209. Post 3624428 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: mestar on November 18, 2013, 03:20:04 PM
But as noted by 600 watt, gold storage and transportation costs money too.

Yes, but this cost of gold will not be passing trough the exchanges (on the sell side as well) and push the price down, like the cost of Bitcoin will. 

As long as miners have costs that can't be paid in Bitcoins, a sizable chunk of that daily $2 million must pass trough exchanges, pushing the price down.  If you can't see this effect on the price today, that does not mean that the effect is not there.

And this effect, this downward pressure on the price is directly connected to the price of Bitcoin.  The higher the Bitcoin price, the stronger the downward pressure on the Bitcoin price.
Are you going somewhere with these arguments?  What is the point?



210. Post 3624553 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: BRADLEYPLOOF on November 18, 2013, 03:33:50 PM
Bitcoin would never get to such a price point (and the electrical power would get more expensive).

Exactly.

This, however, makes some statements about Bitcoin look idiotic.  In a link in this thread a couple of days ago, a guy on TV said

"Bitcoin price could go to million dollars"

Well, it could, as long as you are prepared to have up to 3 billion USD daily usage of electrical power to run such a network.

I'm just trying to wrap my head around where these daily electrical power usage numbers are coming from...are you implying that 100,000,000 more people will start mining and the price of electricity will quadruple?
I haven't done the numbers, but in an efficient market, the profit margin on bitcoin mining should be low.  Thus mining costs (purchase of equipment + electricity (+ other overhead ?)) should be only slightly below the profit (amount of bitcoins mined * bitcoin price).



211. Post 3625168 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: 600watt on November 18, 2013, 03:38:59 PM
Are you going somewhere with these arguments?  What is the point?
I guess the point is that the price of 600 is simply unsustainable for Bitcoin, and not a lot of people understand this.
Or, 600 is sustainable as long as you have 2 million dollars daily of new investments in Bitcoin.
man, you guys sound like experts in the 90ies figuring out that mobile phones will never take off since they use to much energy.  Cheesy
Have I ever said bitcoin wouldn't take off?



212. Post 3625284 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Crazy on November 18, 2013, 04:37:26 PM
Why are you comparing regular models with Bitcoin? Why is this a bubble and not a mass adoption somewhere on Earth? What are the differences? How do you know now there are just people rushing in and not wider bitcoin usage?
Usage where and for what? I'm open to that notion but I have no news of such possibility. For what use are they being adopted that I'm unaware of?
Take-out food?  Hard for us to guess what you are aware of, right?  
By the way, after the dutch and german sites of lieferservice.de and thuisbezorgd.nl, the french, brittish and belgian versions of the site now also accept bitcoin.



213. Post 3625850 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Wow, just wow.



214. Post 3625933 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

And to say I almost bought litecoin yesterday.... (not because I believe in it long-term, but for short term trading)



215. Post 3625990 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

What is happening on btcchina?   Goxbux being cheaper I can understand, but this...



216. Post 3626844 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: windjc on November 18, 2013, 06:49:24 PM
No I'm long on bit stamp and short on bitfinex so when they recouple, both positions profit.

That's smart, except that they may not recouple for another 12 hours, which is plenty of time for you shorts or longs to get crushed.
I think he means without leverage.  AFAIK, Stamp doesn't offer leverage.



217. Post 3628231 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

The senator tries to keep it light  Grin

PS: Is the Secret Service guy there as an advertisement for the Secret Service?  Jeez....



218. Post 3628287 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 18, 2013, 08:40:35 PM
PS: Is the Secret Service guy there as an advertisement for the Secret Service?  Jeez....
Haha, I knew it, he just wants more money  for the Service Grin



219. Post 3628514 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: humanitee on November 18, 2013, 08:51:25 PM
"Bro, we got the PATRIOT ACT"
where is your co-pilot? Spaceman?
We need him to drive that rocket again,.... NOW!!!
His gains have been so large he bought his own rocket!
Grin, nah bro, we'll always fly together  Wink



220. Post 3628931 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Going Full Throttle !!



221. Post 3630170 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Tom Caper seemed like an amusing, reasonable and intelligent guy.
Brito did great.
Murck did good too.
didn't care much for Allaire's embracement of state money transmitter licences (and the monetary threshold they encompass).



222. Post 3630187 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

To da mooooooonn !!!!!  Grin

Gotta love this shared euphoria Cheesy

Of course, the devil might be in the details, but I am excited nevertheless.



223. Post 3630504 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

50% in one fucking day.  






224. Post 3630710 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 18, 2013, 11:07:21 PM
who fapped to her?
Can we not do this? Seriously guys, on one hand we bitch about how all Bitcoiners are male and then we objectify the women that ARE engaged with Bitcoin on the other.

Yep finding a woman attractive is racist and sexist. Seriously what are you on. Do you think woman don't think [insert name of hollywood star] is a sex object.

I actually think what you are saying is more sexist that people saying "oh wow there's an attractive woman"
The statement wasn't "she's hot". That's cool.
It was "who fapped to her?".
I agree with Vycid.  Keep it somewhat decent guys.  Then again, this is an internet forum, so the best thing is probably just to let it go...



225. Post 3630777 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Meanwhile, gox closing in on $800...



226. Post 3630813 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: batcoin on November 18, 2013, 11:18:19 PM
Is there no one left to predict an impending crash to single digits any more?

I think proudhon has developed into a closet case.
Nah, he is bullish these days.



227. Post 3630825 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 18, 2013, 11:18:57 PM
Is there no one left to predict an impending crash to single digits any more?

I guess we reached the tipping point, no single digits ever again unless BTC is going straight to 0.
I think double digits is the new single digits.



228. Post 3631082 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 18, 2013, 11:38:09 PM
Beware of the euphoria, guys.

I'm feeling it... this is better than any drug.

How much have you made this month?
This month?  How much have you made TODAY?  
I just whipped out the calculator and spontaneously did a happy dance  Grin.  
I know euphoria is usually prelude to a hangover feeling, but this feels awesome  Grin .



229. Post 3631141 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 18, 2013, 11:42:25 PM
Beware of the euphoria, guys.

I'm feeling it... this is better than any drug.

How much have you made this month?
This month?  How much have you made TODAY? 
I just whipped out the calculator and spontaneously did a happy dance  Grin
I know euphoria is usually prelude to a hangover feeling, but this feels awesome  Grin .

Paper profits. View them as such. If it drops to $100 tomorrow (without valid reason) I won't care.
I know, it can disappear in a blip. If the april crash is any indication, I won't give a shit until 1-2 weeks after the crash.  Then I hit myself on the head repeatedly for not selling   Smiley .



230. Post 3631201 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

The weird thing about the current "bubble", is that is going up so fast so soon.  Percentage-wise, if it is like previous "bubbles", we could still have quite a way to go, but the daily percentage gains are just off the chart, very reminiscent of a blow-off top.
Let's hope it's just an indication of the incredible demand, and there is a mega-bubble to come   Smiley.



231. Post 3631331 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: humanitee on November 19, 2013, 12:00:04 AM
China is doing it again. 5888! ($966)
Some major arbitraging opportunities there (if only I knew how  Smiley )



232. Post 3631765 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: pera on November 19, 2013, 12:32:38 AM
what? 6000?? is anyone leveraging here? it can't be true, 28 hours ago we were 3000 wtf
+1, nearly 100% gain in 1 day on btcchina = WTF ??   Huh



233. Post 3631964 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):




234. Post 3632523 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: BroodAap on November 19, 2013, 01:34:10 AM
Can someone tell me wtf is going on?  Huh
1) bitcoin was increasing in price
2) bitcoin got (even) more media attention
3) bitcoin went up in price
4) repeat steps 2 and 3, then go to step 5
5) senate hearing was pretty darn positive
6) liftoff
7) price volatility



235. Post 3632548 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 19, 2013, 01:35:15 AM
Can someone tell me wtf is going on?  Huh

All the exchanges are lagging and everyone is panicking, because the bubble is popping.

Now we find the bottom.
A the moment I think we will have a hard correction, but the bubble will still go up in the coming weeks.  I might be wrong though, euphoria is usually not the best emotion for clear thinking  Wink .



236. Post 3632687 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

As always, when I am making good trading decisions, I wager really low amounts.
When I make stupid mistakes, its for large amounts.
Still happy today is the "low amount" day  Smiley



237. Post 3633101 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: NamelessOne on November 19, 2013, 02:19:06 AM
OK so I go out to buy some sandwiches from subway with bitcoin (hooray!), stay for a couple of beers & whiskey, come home and see this? WTF Bitcoin I am drunk and I have no idea what just happened. Did we just "crash" after going up like 25% in 3 hours or what? WTF IS HAPPENING? LOL still great fun to watch
See this attitude tells us..... this isnt a crash. PPL actually enjoying seeing pigs getting slaughtered.
There is so much pork and bacon around this market right now it is like a ww1 battlefield if pigs were fighting it.
Oh man, you just brought this memory back from long long ago: Hogs of War




238. Post 3633270 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Seanzqt on November 19, 2013, 02:38:44 AM
Historic days.

500. The hearing. 900. Wow.

I went out for a couple hours to grab a bite and I lost all the climb to 900 and crash action...  Sad

Does anyone know how big of a dump it was accross all exchanges?


I watched BitStamp crash from $755 to $521  Lips sealed
Bitfinex went to $501.2 at least.  



239. Post 3633462 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 19, 2013, 02:56:54 AM
This is all Spaceman's fault. We were going nicely to the moon then he decided to stop for fuel because he wants to go to Mars....
Some noobs jumped out and got pulled down by gravity.
God damn it.
Couldn't help it, somebody mixed nitro in my rocket fuel...  What a crazy ride !




240. Post 3633501 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 19, 2013, 03:03:48 AM
This is all Spaceman's fault. We were going nicely to the moon then he decided to stop for fuel because he wants to go to Mars....
Some noobs jumped out and got pulled down by gravity.
God damn it.
Couldn't help it, somebody mixed nitro in my rocket fuel.



You guys think that's it? Back to up the hill, or more shakeout?
My guess is we'll still have a bit of volatility, then some consolidation around this level or somewhat lower.  Then to the moon. Then the real crash (of the current bubble).  Guess we'll have to wait and see.



241. Post 3633564 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

*need sleep*
Buh bye people, what a day...



242. Post 3636582 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on November 19, 2013, 10:14:46 AM
Hmm...


Normal reaction to price runup I would think.  Everyone has their price.  People who like $750 (in goxbux) are bringing their bitcoins out of the woodwork.



243. Post 3637264 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Soon, we'll have something to cry about, soon it'll be :




244. Post 3637749 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

holy moley



245. Post 3637887 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Cablez on November 19, 2013, 12:57:49 PM
You guys suck, lol.  Why do you always play while I am asleep?  Nice shakeout by the way.
Yeah, if I went to bed an hour later yesterday, I would have caught a nice spike up on bitfinex.
On the other hand, I almost switched my "price" and "nr of BTCs" in an order, so I probably needed the sleep  Grin.



246. Post 3638039 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

I know I am overposting this, but fuck it...




247. Post 3638228 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: barbs on November 19, 2013, 01:35:06 PM
I am currently crapping my pants
its wiser to go to the toilet.



248. Post 3638847 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Nikolaj06 on November 19, 2013, 02:29:58 PM
If we stabilize at $600ish by the end of the day, we should be back at $650+ by tomorrow.



Nice paint line :b protip: make it thinner xD

What would that accomplish?

A line that's not 50$ thick, it's just an easy way to make it look nicer...
I like it



249. Post 3638861 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on November 19, 2013, 02:33:12 PM
A line that's not 50$ thick, it's just an easy way to make it look nicer...
a decent eye can see it at max represents 25 dollars of thickness
Depends on how far you keep drawing it to the right   Wink, but you are correct.



250. Post 3641903 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: deathcode on November 19, 2013, 06:55:39 PM
The so-called whales from the time of 100-150 are now little babies that cannot manipulate the market any longer.
The fiat whales.  The BTC whales just became "real" whales in the "real" world.



251. Post 3642241 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 19, 2013, 07:13:35 PM
Speaking of which: does anyone know if it's workable to cash out on btcchina, buy gold bullion, and get it shipped to the States? Could a company be started to do that to exploit the huge arbitrage in the exchanges?
I know right?  Professional arbitrageurs must be drooling at bitcoin exchanges.



252. Post 3642250 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 19, 2013, 07:25:12 PM
You know it costs money to mine a bitcoin, right?
i didnt know!
i paid in BTC   Cry
Since when is BTC not money?  Shocked  Shame on you Adam ! Wink



253. Post 3643043 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

HAHA , the guy is a bitcoin daytrader  Grin  Grin



254. Post 3643388 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Voodah on November 19, 2013, 09:01:49 PM
DID WARNER JUST IMPLY BITCOIN WILL DETHRONE USD???

Yup, he implied it could be the world reserve currency !!!

BOOYYAAAH Warner !!

This guy bought bitcoins for sure  Grin



255. Post 3644273 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Ugh Tunstall  Lips sealed



256. Post 3644437 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: gizmoh on November 19, 2013, 10:22:33 PM
Gallipi u screwed the market
Oh come on, he did okay.



257. Post 3644473 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

All in all some mixed feelings about this hearing.

I was more impressed by the senators than some of the panelists.  
Some of their remarks about the profound implications this could have on the economy, banking industry and central banks were absolutely incredible.
On the other hand, I really didn't like much of the regulation stuff.  And redhead lady was just f-ing awful.



258. Post 3644509 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Are you guys looking at different charts than me?  
Looks like pretty normal volatility to me, compared to the action we have seen the last couple of days.



259. Post 3644752 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 19, 2013, 10:54:43 PM
She looks ill.
From what I have heard, it must be a brain disease...



260. Post 3651190 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

My (slightly pessimistic bull) scenario is bottoming out at $350, then quadruple digits.  Entirely possible that we bottomed out already though.
My "trading play" money is mostly in BTC atm.

If this is a real crash, then I am just plain wrong  Smiley.



261. Post 3651244 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on November 20, 2013, 01:36:14 PM
$900 to $400 is a bubble pop. Period. It's not a healthy correction. It's not a consolidation. It is exactly what I've been talking about. The WORST thing that can happen to Bitcoin. I posted on FB the other day "Bitcoin on the rise about to break $800" huge amount of comments all similar to "wow, awesome, congrats". Then the emails start pouring in. Questions, thoughts, what, how, where. Today I wake up to those same people saying "man I'm glad I sat that out, dude do you want to cut your wrists or what, glad I didn't throw any money in is lose half and still be losing"  

The people on this forum are bitcoiners. The people in the real world are not. They don't give a shit about the technology, they don't believe bitcoins will replace their fiat currency, the only thing they see it as is something they can invest in and every time we start to see some solid new money come in everyone starts speculating and the whales start taking advantage. The only thing people currently see and are talking about "Bitcoin crashes yet again, and costs investors billions".

Wake up people. For people who are so smart, your pretty dumb to try and fool yourself and others that this is healthy and just a nice correction/consolidation.

As always, I greatly respect your opinion and determination.



262. Post 3652217 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Richy_T on November 20, 2013, 03:25:05 PM
Exchanges are obsolete. They're just trading on inertia.
Care to explain?



263. Post 3654335 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 20, 2013, 06:54:18 PM
hahaha bears are dying!

FUCK YA!
You bought in again?



264. Post 3655368 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on November 20, 2013, 08:20:43 PM
every damn time. what happened to good old "lurk moar"? here's your answer: the (highly secure) blockchain is most likely not the ideal medium for micro transfers, and probably not even for small-ish transactions like paying for your coffee. That doesn't mean Bitcoin will fail, it only means there will be ways to perform smaller transaction off the chain.

Such as in bitcoin specie.  Its ideal for the small off-block-chain point-of-sale no-delay small transaction and is also more anonymous than the cryptocurrency.
/shameless-plug
are you talking about stuff like Casascius coins?



265. Post 3658519 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: windjc on November 21, 2013, 02:02:50 AM
When the start of the big red candle hit, I said to myself:

"Self, there are 3 possibilities here."

A. We would snap back hard and keep moving up, similar to how we did just a week prior.

B. We would have a correction that was more like a breather. We would go lower, consolidate for a few days or a week and then march our way back up, slowly building up steam, having a hard time between 900-1000 and then finally blow up past 1000 in a short while after and have another stratospheric rise before FINALLY correcting for a longer period of time.

C. We would reverse trend for a few months or more before going pre-bubble again.

After the first hard snapback I said to myself "self, it looks like it is going to be A or B. Wow. That's crazy."

Then 24 hours later, it looked like it was going to be option C.

But now, I think it is either option B or C. And unless we have some weakness in the next 48 hours, it's looking more and more like B is going to take this one.

I'm pretty excited either way. But, if B is confirmed and we start heading in a northernly direction, it is going to be one hell of a fireworks show this holiday season.  Because the next parabolic rise will be nothing short of spectacular.  And once we get past $1000, there really isn't resistance for miles.
Yah, I am thinking B.



266. Post 3664886 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 21, 2013, 04:41:57 PM
here we go!

weeeeeeeeeeeeeee
What you see depends on the exhange you are looking at...



267. Post 3666799 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 21, 2013, 07:46:50 PM
Malevolent is right. Never go full fiat. That's been historically a losing strategy, and that's a matter of fact - unless you sold to buy back lower and you succeeded, obviously.
The dude made half a million bucks and got a house.  I would be happy....



268. Post 3666846 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: notme on November 21, 2013, 07:50:23 PM
Malevolent is right. Never go full fiat. That's been historically a losing strategy, and that's a matter of fact - unless you sold to buy back lower and you succeeded, obviously.
The dude made half a million bucks.  I would be happy....

If he had left half on the table, he'd have another $100k by now.
OK, but you never know that, right?  Having a house is lower risk.
I would probably never cash out completely, but still, can't blame the guy, as I said, I would be happy in his place.



269. Post 3667576 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

*yawn*, give us some action already.  At this point I might actually have to do something constructive with the rest of my day...  Wink



270. Post 3668284 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 21, 2013, 10:13:05 PM
Is there anyone who wants to exit Litecoins for a nice profit?

I buy LTC in quantity and pay fiat currency your choice.
Trying to talk up the market?  (I might be getting somewhat paranoid about you trying to influence the market, if so, apologies)



271. Post 3668873 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Wow, I didn't think we would be at these prices this fast again.



272. Post 3668928 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):






273. Post 3668969 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on November 21, 2013, 11:19:59 PM
Bitcoin!
Subway is in board! This is exciting!

https://twitter.com/SUBWAY/status/403628068222156801
Thats news from several days ago.
EDIT: its new that they twittered it on their account though.



274. Post 3669006 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: neutrinox on November 21, 2013, 11:28:41 PM

Thats news from several days ago.

Not really, a few days ago there wasn't any official endorsement so it might have just been few rogue entrepreneuers accepting them. Now we have an official tweet from subway!
Yeah, I edited my post already.



275. Post 3669265 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Pruden on November 21, 2013, 11:57:18 PM
Speculation is the gateway drug to bitcoin.
Nice



276. Post 3669386 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 21, 2013, 11:50:01 PM
Any particular reason why the bitcoin price would surge due to merchant adoption? Let's all be honest with each other, bitcoin is still hard as fuck to use for the average person when buying something. Couple that with the volatility and there's just no incentive for anyone to use bitcoin over dollars.

All it would achieve is bring in more speculators who want in on the craze because they think they might make some profit. Yes that might surge the price temporarily, but it would drop just as fast as soon as everyone realizes everyone else is just here to make profits.

Think of it another way, Bitcoin is the backend infrastructure that will allow entrepreneurs to build front end systems that take advantage of it's low transaction cost and security. It just happens to be a speculative vehicle as well, but in some ways if you think about it, it was fiendishly genus to make it deflationary driving huge demand from speculators guaranteeing it's adoption and growth as time goes on. We will eventually hit the top of the S-curve or it will all go to shit, but in any case.....enjoy the ride.

I totally agree that bitcoin is some sort of template for things to come. But thinking merchant adoption is important at this point is just wrong. There's a buttload of other stuff that needs to be solved first.

I too think the infrastructure still needs a lot of work in order for a bitcoin economy to work.  Still, it is encouraging to see big companies contemplate using bitcoin.  Of course, they may just want part of the free media exposure, but who cares, they see it as a positive, and they are willing to take a chance associating themselves with bitcoin.  



277. Post 3669416 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on November 22, 2013, 12:13:43 AM
It's frozenlock, he thinks we're dummies.
If he didn't close that short, it may explain his absence.


Auch !



278. Post 3669442 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 22, 2013, 12:17:34 AM
Subway! Is that worldwide? If so, this is going so much faster than I ever imagined Cheesy
Very much so.
EDIT: oh, you probably meant the bitcoin acception.  No, it isn't.



279. Post 3669527 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 22, 2013, 12:29:16 AM
What's really going to matter for the rest of the franchises, is whether these participating Subways are seeing any significant revenue via Bitcoin.  

You went finally all in?
Seems like a neutral observation to me.



280. Post 3686768 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on November 23, 2013, 03:15:33 PM
Tulips are not useless, they might not be a good currency but they can be a store of value, nobody has control over your Tulips but you
*facepalm*



281. Post 3688319 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: byronbb on November 23, 2013, 06:22:55 PM
This is a major company. The news keeps piling up!

http://www.avatrade.com/about-avatrade

This is old.

Yeah, its getting hard keeping up with all the news now that bitcoin keeps growing.



282. Post 3695781 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on November 24, 2013, 12:35:36 PM
Even if you do not catch the crypto currency wave early, you will still benefit of the fairness and wealth-creating/preserving aspects of this technology.

A new Golden Age.

It's true I was kind of ambivalent about investing at one point because I thought, "If Bitcoin succeeds, just about everyone is eventually going to be rich by today's standards anyway, whether they bought in or not." It's more about how fast you want to get there. If you invest now, you get to experience financial freedom in a year or two, instead of a decade or two.
Come on Zangelbert.  You can't possibly believe everybody is going to get rich?  I mean, sure, if bitcoin is a more efficient method of payment and finance in general, then it will benefit the general population, much like the internet itself has already provided many benefits to the economy. But it doesn't instantaneously transform everybody into millionairs.



283. Post 3702617 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: nanobrain on November 25, 2013, 12:33:37 AM
Put your bids in the $100-200 range.
You're a trier Walsoraj, I'll give you that Smiley

Not certain it will happen within the next 24hrs, but by Friday for sure!

By Friday eh?
OK, I'll have you a little wager it's still above $500 by Friday midnight GMT.

The loser has to post a self-composed poem describing what a bad trader they are?

$201 - $499 and we are both safe.
I like this bet, very creative  Smiley.



284. Post 3710106 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on November 25, 2013, 05:09:52 PM
I can't help but keep seeing the pennant formation forming.

A few days, a week, even, and we may well get another 50-100%+ launch.

All of the exchanges seem to support, and I know I'm not the only one seeing this.

I concur.

*Ladies and gentleman, this is your captain speaking.  Prepare for lift-off ! *


Quote from: MikeH on November 25, 2013, 05:10:29 PM
Max Keiser has been pushing litecoin a bit lately. :/
Keiser is a pumper.



285. Post 3711423 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: micalith on November 25, 2013, 07:07:29 PM
How is it that online wallets are so vulnerable to thefts? Do they all have the same vulnerability which can't be fixed or something?
The common vulnerability is that they are third parties which hold bitcoins on behalf of other people.

It can never be fixed other than convincing people to never let third parties hold their bitcoins for them, but there are ways to make online wallets less unsafe.

is there a safer option (other than paper wallets) where they don't have to download the whole blockchain?

edit: sorry OT
I am guessing Multibit (lightweight client, you control your own wallet files --> so put a password on it, and make sure your computer isn't full of viruses)



286. Post 3711939 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Does anyone know if there is something like Gyft for Europe?  Can't seem to find any.



287. Post 3714117 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Funny to watch bear and bull fight it out both in the market and in this thread.  Smiley



288. Post 3714470 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: antoineph on November 25, 2013, 11:56:58 PM
Yet I have to see the big drop to 300-500 that so many oldtimers here seem to be expecting.


With so many expecting it, it may never happen.

many are also expecting a rise

And so we continue to do nothing....



289. Post 3714594 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: bassclef on November 26, 2013, 12:02:39 AM
Yet I have to see the big drop to 300-500 that so many oldtimers here seem to be expecting
With so many expecting it, it may never happen.
many are also expecting a rise
And so we continue to do nothing....
Haven't we done enough? Cheesy
I think so yes.  Very healthy that we take a breather here. I don't expect it to last until the end of the week though... 



290. Post 3715334 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: MAbtc on November 26, 2013, 01:36:06 AM
The longer we stay in this price range, the sooner the bears start buying.
That's what bulls say. Bears say that the longer we stay in this price range, whales start dumping.  Smiley

Yeah, but the difference is the bulls are right  Grin.



291. Post 3726065 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 25, 2013, 05:18:45 PM
*Ladies and gentleman, this is your captain speaking.  Prepare for lift-off ! *

*Ladies and gentleman, this is your captain speaking.
We had some delays because there were bears loose on the runway.
They have been taken care of, so relax and enjoy the flight.  
We hope you will fly with bitcoin airways again*



292. Post 3726227 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: proudhon on November 26, 2013, 08:13:33 PM
*Ladies and gentleman, this is your captain speaking.  Prepare for lift-off ! *

*Ladies and gentleman, this is your captain speaking.
We had some delays because there were bears loose on the runway.
They have been taken care of, so relax and enjoy the flight.  
We hope you will fly with bitcoin airways again*

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

We're flying Virgin, I assume.

Same thing nowadays.



293. Post 3726995 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: windjc on November 26, 2013, 09:09:27 PM
So you're on btc forum betting on btc price, but the bet is in fiat?

Countdown update: less than 3 1/2 days to 1000.

$50 away Smiley



No.

4 days ago I told everyone that judging by the correction in March, that this correction would break out and hit $1000 by Friday night. And I've just been reminding people to get on the north train ever since.

We are going to FLY through $1000 like butter.  Wake me up at $1300-1400. 
(then again, I might just be getting overconfident)



294. Post 3727053 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 26, 2013, 09:16:33 PM
We are going to FLY through $1000 like butter.  Wake me up at $1300-1400. 
(then again, I might just be getting overconfident)

No sleeping! We need you piloting the rocket!

As far as I am concerned, it's on auto-pilot right now.  It's gonna go up no matter what  Grin .



295. Post 3729029 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Next couple of days are going to be WILD !



296. Post 3736618 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: windjc on November 27, 2013, 06:31:31 AM
Price isn't moving because everyone's busy pumping alt-coins.
 Grin

I personally learned a lot in the last 36 hours regarding the crypto market and how it reacts to rallys in Bitcoin. I completely missed the boat with this most recent alt rally. And now that it has happened it seems so absolutely obvious to me. So when the time is right, I will not be making that mistake again. Lesson learned. Live and learn.

(Meanwhile, 3 days left for BTC to hit $1000. My best guess was always today or tomorrow, but we will see. I wonder if its just going to happen in a split instance or if Gox is going to tease us for a few more days?)

Yeah, I really considered buying LTC around $2 for short term trading purposes (to get more BTC in the end), because I could see a scenario like this happening, but I basically chickened out (wanted LTC/BTC to drop even further), big mistake.  And even a few days ago I was thinking it could still go up, but chickened out again. Maybe LTC/BTC will still go higher in the near future, but I don't think its a particularly interesting trade anymore right now.



297. Post 3736655 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

$1000 incoming?



298. Post 3736703 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: macsga on November 27, 2013, 02:28:34 PM
Price isn't moving because everyone's busy pumping alt-coins.
 Grin

I personally learned a lot in the last 36 hours regarding the crypto market and how it reacts to rallys in Bitcoin. I completely missed the boat with this most recent alt rally. And now that it has happened it seems so absolutely obvious to me. So when the time is right, I will not be making that mistake again. Lesson learned. Live and learn.

(Meanwhile, 3 days left for BTC to hit $1000. My best guess was always today or tomorrow, but we will see. I wonder if its just going to happen in a split instance or if Gox is going to tease us for a few more days?)

Yeah, I really considered buying LTC around $2 for short term trading purposes (to get more BTC in the end), because I could see a scenario like this happening, but I basically chickened out (wanted LTC/BTC to drop even further), big mistake.  And even a few days ago I was thinking it could still go up, but chickened out again. Maybe LTC/BTC will still go higher in the near future, but I don't think its a particularly interesting trade anymore right now.

It's a nice concept but I prefer holding over trading. Holding never got me out of the BTC game. Trading on the other hand... Wink

I would never trade altcoins with a major part of my capital (unless I saw a really significant improvement to bitcoin coming out).  Just playing with a fraction of my stash, for the most part I hold BTC long-term (although I made some nasty mistakes this summer).



299. Post 3736732 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: hlynur on November 27, 2013, 02:29:55 PM
any theory what happens when litecoin crashes, how would that affect bitcoin? (doubling value within 2 days...wtf  Huh)

Litecoin crashing just eases the concomittant bitcoin downtrend.



300. Post 3736777 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSLlZh9yelk



301. Post 3736959 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):




302. Post 3737119 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

History gentleman !  Cool



303. Post 3737191 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: dr_nix on November 27, 2013, 02:58:53 PM
Posting to be in the history books! Hi Mom!
Exactly! But I'm posting for my future children and grandchildren Smiley Hi there! Cheers from 2013!
Grandchildren : '1 bitcoin was worth 1000 dollar?  WTF is a dollar? '



304. Post 3744490 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: simonk83 on November 27, 2013, 11:57:04 PM


lol, love this.



305. Post 3767771 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: damnek on November 29, 2013, 04:12:34 PM
ok guys who of you produced this advertising pitch?

http://moneymorning.com/ext/bitcoin/videos/video-bitcoin.php

how come I've never stumbled upon this before?

Where did this video show up? I'd like to know how old it is.. The pumping is now being directed to the dumb masses..

Feeding the greed...  Somehow "a dentist in country X accepts it" becomes "in country X, dentists accept it".



306. Post 3769151 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: oda.krell on November 29, 2013, 06:06:09 PM

Just posting to show off my new sig.

People might think you are serious.

And I agree, it's a depressing shameless truth-mangling pump-video. 



307. Post 3769186 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: maz on November 29, 2013, 06:29:08 PM
This thread needs more Samuel L. Jackson memes.Cheesy

A break from meme's please. Sad

The amount of 'double bottoms' i've had to hide from my boss almost got me fired  Cheesy

Double bottom is getting old.. , and it wasn't even that funny to begin with.



308. Post 3787506 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Bitcoines on December 01, 2013, 12:54:03 AM
what would you be able to trade bitcoins for if the dollar/euro crashed first?
or if it gets stronger by that time, would it replace them?
or if its not ready for the colective conciusness would it crash as well?
or what would you be able to trade it for?


btw cant see no big wall, its only day trading, bots and traps atm it seems, looks like it will continue steadly rising .

I'm going to step away from the uber-bullishness for a minute to say that the dollar/euro aren't going to be immediately swept away by Bitcoin. That simply won't happen.

It's not to say that Bitcoin can't rapidly achieve a trillion-dollar-plus market cap - I believe it can - just that the role of inflationary currencies will continue to be a large and important one for the foreseeable future. Beyond the fact that tax obligations have to be paid in state-issued fiat, banking will be difficult in Bitcoin, and financial markets will certainly not be switching anytime soon - most "wealth" is in equities or derivatives, priced in dollars.

Then there's the fact that oil can only be purchased with dollars.

Gold, silver, and fiat have been coexisting for many years now, and I do not expect Bitcoin will upset that balance. We're looking at a timescale of decades before we can expect fiat to go away.

Frankly, I much prefer it that way. A functional alternative to fiat is actually better than a giant upheaval.

Some people still get the paper in their driveway every morning. And sometimes even I enjoy the experience.

I guess i agree with you, you make valid points, and true i prefer it that way as well, i was just thinking it becuase as i see it works kind of like this way the backd up   Gold/Silver --->>> Currencies --->>> Bitcoin value?,   *correct me if im wrong

while the direct backup for bitcoin is the hash number of each?

or am i just tripping

There is no "backing". There is only utility.



309. Post 3793394 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Shite this goes fast.  Look at chart, ponder buying, put in buy order without finalizing, look at chart again to double check.   Price is already $100 higher  Undecided .



310. Post 3793411 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

I am surprised there is so little action in this thread.  Usually when there is a lot of volatility, I have to try clicking "post" multiple times in a row, because there is such a high number of replies.



311. Post 3793414 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: revans on December 01, 2013, 07:29:02 PM
Let's be clear. Bitcoin isn't a currency or a store of value, it's just the crack cocaine of speculation.
Oh look, it's this guy...  Roll Eyes
Have you figured out how percentages work yet?



312. Post 3793432 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 01, 2013, 07:37:11 PM
I am surprised there is so little action in this thread.  Usually when there is a lot of volatility, I have to try clicking "post" multiple times in a row, because there is such a high number of replies.

I think because so few posts these days have any real value to them. Most of this thread is filled with just noise these days, very little debate or even discussion.
Was that ever different?



313. Post 3801244 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

The pumping is strong these days.  When the next bubble starts, I 'll just buy every alt in town  Grin, heck, I'll even create a few of my own  Cheesy.  
Brainstorming for names here: Pumpcoin (PMPC), CloneCoin (CC), SuckerCoin (SKRC) ... any other ideas?



314. Post 3801348 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Loving the feedback, Cheesy. Keep 'em coming, we are going to be rich   Wink.



315. Post 3803850 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: MikeH on December 03, 2013, 04:37:53 AM
the fact that max has mentioned quark coin has pretty much convinced me that he's in the game for the sole purpose pumping and dumping. i'll watch his videos, but fuck him.. i don't think he's some sort of angel.

true, I noticed he follows a pumper on twitter.. https://twitter.com/fontase


Keiser is a pumper allright, no surprise there.



316. Post 3804021 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: philip2000uk on December 03, 2013, 08:44:04 AM
the fact that max has mentioned quark coin has pretty much convinced me that he's in the game for the sole purpose pumping and dumping. i'll watch his videos, but fuck him.. i don't think he's some sort of angel.

true, I noticed he follows a pumper on twitter.. https://twitter.com/fontase


Keiser is a pumper allright, no surprise there.
Are you talking about max keiser? what is this twitter? are they manipulating the market?
yes, Max Keiser, I don't follow his twitter.  I doubt Keiser is big enough to sufficiently manipulate "the" bitcoin market in a huge way, but I nevertheless think he buys before he start going in full-on hype mode, and then sells.  And he probably has enough followers that it might make somewhat of a difference, especially in the smaller altcoin markets.



317. Post 3804119 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: philip2000uk on December 03, 2013, 08:50:11 AM
the fact that max has mentioned quark coin has pretty much convinced me that he's in the game for the sole purpose pumping and dumping. i'll watch his videos, but fuck him.. i don't think he's some sort of angel.

true, I noticed he follows a pumper on twitter.. https://twitter.com/fontase


Keiser is a pumper allright, no surprise there.
Are you talking about max keiser? what is this twitter? are they manipulating the market?
yes, Max Keiser, I don't follow his twitter.  I doubt Keiser is big enough to sufficiently manipulate "the" market in a huge way, but I nevertheless think he buys before he start going in full-on hype mode, and then sells.  And he probably has enough followers that it might make a difference.
Thanks for explaining, i thought he'd have enough money to not even be bothered about bitcoin but wanted to preach it for the good.  So now i have to look at him as a profiteer and not for the good of bitcoin? 
That is my view yes.  I am pretty darn sure he buys the stuff with his own money.  To what degree he tells himself that he is in it for the right reasons, or whether he truly sees himself as a pumper, that I am not so sure of.  Some people can be very good in deluding themselves with all kinds of rationalisations while taking the route that benefits them the most money-wise.



318. Post 3812716 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

He could cash out quickly, and put downwards pressure on the price, or he could wait for years in order for people to lose interest, which would remove coins from circulation and be bullish.  Or a combination of both.  We just don't know.



319. Post 3813204 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: niothor on December 03, 2013, 10:57:54 PM
Are you guys seeing this?

https://blockchain.info/address/1CbR8da9YPZqXJJKm9ze1GYf67eKAUfXwP

Aftermath of the scam: people sending him more BTC.

Quite funny.
Are you sure that is coming from other people and not coin tumblers or something of the sort?

Lots of people begging for coins there:)
And this:

Public Note: Algerian prinCe, pUre unOBTAINium SHARE, B4 Culture requIres me to pay 5.55 btc, RegretFUlly Gorillaz ate wallet, leNd me COIN i will RE-PAY you ASAP, trust U share with fellow *Wo*MAN IN NEED... Know U red-it & know Y wii-CU
Only in bitcoinland ....



320. Post 3814822 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: MickeyT2008 on December 04, 2013, 02:05:11 AM


Edit:  How do you make these images smaller when you repost them?
Try quoting my post and check it out.

Good thing bitcoinity dev is doing something, because the price action is boring...



321. Post 3815663 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on December 04, 2013, 04:10:26 AM
Wow, big buy on Gox (17 btc).

Oh, who am I kidding.  It's dead out there..
I thought there was mad action going on, then i realized bitcoinity shows everything in mBTC now  Roll Eyes .



322. Post 3820177 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

I think a fee of 0.1 mBTC makes more sense than 0.0001 BTC, especially if it would be lowered further.  People are going to lose time counting all the zeros and double-checking.  It's impractical.



323. Post 3829329 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: windjc on December 05, 2013, 01:54:06 AM
Does this rally not look tired to anyone here?

We are just slowing down in this altitude. There is no real upward momentum.

Wednesday is almost over and we have retraced most of the highs. But what happens now? We just shoot up into the stratosphere?

I still have my doubts. Becoming a more modest bull at the moment.

Emotionally, I am feeling quite similar to you.  But just looking at the technicals, it's doing a pretty standard thing I believe.  Of course past patterns don't have to be repeated in the future, but often after a correction, we would go up slowly again, plateau for a while at the previous ATH (for like the next day, maybe 2), and then shoot up rapidly.



324. Post 3829407 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on December 05, 2013, 02:00:50 AM
Does this rally not look tired to anyone here?

We are just slowing down in this altitude. There is no real upward momentum.

Wednesday is almost over and we have retraced most of the highs. But what happens now? We just shoot up into the stratosphere?

I still have my doubts. Becoming a more modest bull at the moment.

Emotionally, I am feeling quite similar to you.  But just looking at the technicals, it's doing a pretty standard thing I believe.  Of course past patterns don't have to be repeated in the future, but often after a correction, we would go up slowly again, plateau for a while at the previous ATH (for like the next day, maybe 2), and then shoot up rapidly.

It's natural to get nervous/paranoid when the price goes up so quickly, even if you're confident in the underlying asset/currency.  Realize what is rational though given context, news, momentum, etc.

Oh, and change in perception (media angles, finance world, public comments....).
I am not nervous.  I am tired and somewhat in doubt of my judgement at the moment.  Perhaps lack of sleep due to a non-bitcoin-related matter plays a role in this.



325. Post 3830959 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: TERA on December 05, 2013, 05:10:19 AM
One final correction to 1080 before next leg?
more like $1160



326. Post 3832606 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

bleh, fiat not accessible, otherwise I would have bought some here.



327. Post 3832777 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Some chump change got released from loan, so I got to buy at $920 on finex, looking like a good deal so far.



328. Post 3832887 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

bitcoinwisdom is acting weird for me.



329. Post 3835658 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: ghdp on December 05, 2013, 01:25:45 PM

So they just discovered bitcoin and "analyse" that the fair value is precisely 10% above yesterday's value, 5% above last week's ATH Huh

I want that job !
And everybody can see that bitcoin equals silver,... right?
'Tis the purest form of science.



330. Post 3835930 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Does anybody know of a platform that lets you short altcoins (other than litecoin) ? 



331. Post 3849719 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Hfertig on December 06, 2013, 01:13:51 PM
Not too much price action. I guess the fact that all bitcoins deposits and withdrawals from bitstamp have disappeared doesn't help.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1s8gfk/psa_do_not_withdraw_btc_from_bitstamp_at_this/

I was just talking with an employee at Bitstamp and he told me they had a broadcast delay, and everything should be working now, I can try send some BTC my self and report back, but BTW why didnt you open a ticket and if you did what kind of answer you got ?

Does it mean that once the deposit issues are fixed, we can expect an influx of both BTC and USD and an increase in trading activity as the result?
>1025 tonight?

From what I read, it is only Bitcoins that create issues. So we do speak of an influx of BTC only. I“d say, once these coins hit the exchange, people are going to sell. My guess is <985 once issues are fixed.
Or people feel reassured and confident again because things are working like they should, and stop freaking out and selling the BTC they still have on balance on bitstamp.
See, you can reason for the opposite to happen as well.  That's why we are in the speculation subforum.



332. Post 3850138 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Hfertig on December 06, 2013, 01:31:03 PM
From what I read, it is only Bitcoins that create issues. So we do speak of an influx of BTC only. I“d say, once these coins hit the exchange, people are going to sell. My guess is <985 once issues are fixed.
Or people feel reassured and confident again because things are working like they should, and stop freaking out and selling the BTC they still have on balance on bitstamp.
See, you can reason for the opposite to happen as well.  That's why we are in the speculation subforum.


You are right, there is always room for speculation. Lets see how this is going to turn out. But why would you deposit BTC on Bitstamp anyway ? To keep them there ? Those people were hoping to sell at higher prices...
to trade



333. Post 3858677 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Yikes, this is looking ugly.



334. Post 3859470 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 07, 2013, 02:32:17 AM
Wow.

And I'm already letting myself imagine that I could've called the bottom on that if I'd been holding any fiat.
I missed by $40 (put it too low).  Not sure if we won't revisit though.  



335. Post 3859529 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on December 07, 2013, 02:38:28 AM
Wow.

And I'm already letting myself imagine that I could've called the bottom on that if I'd been holding any fiat.
I missed by $40 (put it too low).  Not sure if we won't revisit though.  

We will, and even lower. Monday is quite far away....
I am thinking mondays don't matter anymore now.  Would be surprised if the exponential bull run (the short term one) continues after this.  The main question is where the new equilibrium lies.



336. Post 3859536 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: BC-Trader on December 07, 2013, 02:38:49 AM
I will buy $10,000 worth of bitcoin at a market value to USD between $15 and $35 which is fair value for the currency..everything above that is absolute bubbly.....I congratulate all those who got rich from the boom but the bust can be extreme..
keep dreaming



337. Post 3867920 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

My personalized summary of yesterday's events:






338. Post 3867983 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: niothor on December 07, 2013, 06:31:30 PM
My personalized summary of yesterday's events:


Does that thing have an ejection seat?
No need, I just sit the crash out (and do a little bit of trading).




339. Post 3868034 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: humanitee on December 07, 2013, 06:33:30 PM
No need, I just sit the crash out.



You just bought that thing!  Cry
Just needs some time to get repaired, and it 'll fly better than ever  Wink .



340. Post 3868705 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: ardana123 on December 07, 2013, 07:29:52 PM
I have a 12 year old Renault Scenic works as charm, I love the cheap parts if I have to repair anything, however I own this car for sometime I hadn't to repair anything except the check that I have each 15000 KM and maybe the brakes I had to change.

my wife want even a bigger car, but I am not even thinking about changing this one, it is working and it is serving its purpose.

Same here, I own a 13 year old Honda Civic since 3 years now. Never had anything break on it, cheap as fuk to drive around in...

Beats me why I would spend hard earned money on a status symbol like a fancy car. Even if I was rich i'd probably go for something midrange than a Ferrari or Porsche...
I wouldn't be surprised if this is a somewhat general characteristic of a typical 'bitcoiner'.  I have got a bunch of second-hand furniture, because it looks ok, does the job, and costs way less than new stuff.  Don't have a car either.  I would much rather invest the money that I save by doing so, in the hopes of becoming less dependent on income from my job, and doing only what I feel like doing.



341. Post 3869903 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: John999 on December 07, 2013, 09:22:46 PM
Saving is good, hoarding like a lunatic is not.
The beauty of Bitcoin is that people like you can't forcefully impose your subjective preferences on anyone other than yourself.
True. But if everybody in the world was hoarding like a maniac, there wouldn't be any economy, any jobs, any leisures.
Where exactly is the boundary between saving and hoarding?  And who decides that?



342. Post 3873679 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: TERA on December 08, 2013, 05:30:33 AM


I'm not sure if I can bring myself to buy big at this moment, but you guys go ahead...
What is this chart saying according to you?  (If I am not mistaken, you've made some pretty good calls so far)



343. Post 3879152 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: TERA on December 08, 2013, 04:46:30 PM
The 'Chinese Scare' was actually good news guys.

It doesn't feel like it did us much good right now, though!

A few days ago I was sure we would take Gold and then rise to, oooh, y'know 1300 up to 1500 range.

Since then we have dipped below 600 and can't seem to stay over 700.

I have spent all my fiat buying at what seems to be amazing prices compared to a even a week ago.    

Good news would be stability over 800 right now - I would settle for that!

Yes it was surely breaking 1250 and having another leg up with with a solid correction behind it, before the news.  It is very interesting to see how bubble pop dynamics are precisely played out on the chart when the event was actually news driven. I would never have said we were in the "bubble phase" of the rally yet because there were healthy corrections.
I think we were kinda bubbly, but I was also expecting another leg up (which is why I didn't sell for incoming correction/crash-trading).  Probably the uncertainty of what the China news meant was enough to drive people to profit-taking.
I think the medium-term bull market is over, but it wouldn't be the first time that bitcoin has proven me wrong. I wouldn't mind being wrong at all Grin.



344. Post 3883073 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: freethink2013 on December 08, 2013, 10:31:01 PM
china crisis hit us hard and we were in full on panic mode yet @550 the market decided woohoo cheap coins! I still think anything under 1000 is cheap coins. Not sure if we'll make 4 figures next week but we'll come close.
The crisis was imaginary. What happened in China was actually good news.

Can you elaborate why ?
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1sbefw/chinese_investment_banker_says_what_nobody_in_the/

The crash has almost nothing to do with the "quasi"-ban on bitcoins and everything to do with new ID verification requirements by BTCChina.

Same old story. An exchange attracts money launderers and price manipulators. Then requires ID verification. The criminals flee to another exchange.

My guess is someone will set up the new btcchina in India soon.

this explains btc-e's recent surges
No, because they would buy bitcoin at BTC China with their funds, and then sell at BTC-e, giving the exact opposite result.



345. Post 3883538 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on December 08, 2013, 11:12:12 PM
Finally, sold once @the right time. Now we can go down please  Cheesy
You only get to say that it was the right time in hindsight...



346. Post 3884387 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: jonoiv on December 09, 2013, 12:43:14 AM
bid and ask depth of an exchange

Thank You!

So from the chart it means there are more people waiting to sell above the current price than there are people wanting to buy below the current price?

Is the chart Gox or another exchange ?
gox



347. Post 3884661 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on December 09, 2013, 01:13:32 AM
BREAKING NEWS:  Krusty the clown mentions Bitcoin on the Simpsons.

Updating Price Target: $2200 by Christmas
True story?



348. Post 3884722 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: SheHadMANHands on December 09, 2013, 01:17:07 AM
BREAKING NEWS:  Krusty the clown mentions Bitcoin on the Simpsons.
Updating Price Target: $2200 by Christmas
True story?
According to about 19 Reddit posts, yes.. true storaayy
Ah reddit, my fallback drug when btctalk is down, and I am jonesing for bitcoin news...



349. Post 3884851 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: jofus87 on December 09, 2013, 01:32:46 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIs-K3kUUZg

Krusty Clip
Thanks



350. Post 3885030 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Stamp on the move (somewhat)



351. Post 3885370 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on December 09, 2013, 02:37:42 AM
Bull trap finished, lets wreck this shit.

Forgot to buy?
When have you ever seen Mucus make a bullish comment?



352. Post 3892130 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: octaft on December 09, 2013, 03:26:13 PM
The time to sell was at 1100-1200. Buying had really died down, and the tops were flat. You could kind of justify selling at 950 now, I guess, but if you sold at, like, 600, that's kind of silly. Even if you think it will continue to go down, at least wait for the almost inevitable bounce.
So you are saying that we should have sold at the high, and not at the low?  Well go figure...  Wink



353. Post 3897330 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: molecular on December 09, 2013, 10:28:02 PM
because you must be out of fiat, meaning your all in. Ooooh boy.

Don't worry, I almost always am.

On a side-note it's quite ironic. To go even longer on leverage I would have to sell first in order to be able to put up the collateral.

I think you can put your collateral in BTC too (on bitfinex).  I personally wouldn't recommend it though (being that leveraged with everything).



354. Post 3898697 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on December 10, 2013, 12:26:05 AM
We need more choo choo in here
http://youtu.be/6lutNECOZFw?t=6s
Is he for real?  Dude is practically jizzing his pants  Grin .



355. Post 3898879 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

feels like we are close to the decision point of a continued bull market or not.  I don't have a fucking clue atm (medium-term).



356. Post 3898906 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: fred1111 on December 10, 2013, 12:49:25 AM
feels like we are close to the decision point of a continued bull market or not.  
The chinese made that decision it seems
If we get to $1050-1100, I'll be convinced.



357. Post 3898926 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: tarmi on December 10, 2013, 12:50:53 AM
pathetic volume.
be careful.
volume isn't that bad.



358. Post 3899470 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: CryptStorm on December 10, 2013, 01:47:33 AM
950 sliced and diced:


Where are you getting that nice book depth chart, pretty please?  Shocked Shocked Shocked
clarkmoody



359. Post 3899620 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: MickeyT2008 on December 10, 2013, 02:02:57 AM
Or this one, which doesn't seem to lag as badly and can show multiple markets:  http://bitcointicker.co/
hadn't seen that one before.



360. Post 3899857 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: niothor on December 10, 2013, 02:26:27 AM
Watch out bears, here comes the choochoo.



Damn. Animated gif isn't working for some reason.

ah so its not just me.

In this case , I really like that it ain't working:)
poor bear



361. Post 3900014 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on December 10, 2013, 02:49:36 AM
Post deleted

It is perhaps a little disturbing, but even as an animal lover, I consider  bears to be somewhere between rats, seagulls and cockroaches... disgusting filthy vermin who feed in garbage dumps.
Rats are actually very intelligent and social creatures.  And I don't think feeding on garbage means that something doesn't have the right to live.



362. Post 3913854 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Holliday on December 11, 2013, 12:57:33 AM
I wish bitcoin exchanges would not be open 24/7.

If one (or all) decides to use "banker's hours" there will just be a new exchange to fill that gap and the "banker's hours" exchanges will get left behind.

The Bitcoin protocol is 24/7 and nothing is going to stop that. Trading will occur regardless.
Plus, not having 24/7 exchanges would be a major risk for payment processors such as bitpay.



363. Post 3915775 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: justusranvier on December 11, 2013, 04:50:53 AM
I haven't been able to check the forum the last couple days because of this conference in Las Vegas.

Can anyone summarize the last 30 pages or so of this thread?
"Haha, stupid bears"



364. Post 3915787 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Holliday on December 11, 2013, 04:53:00 AM
Can anyone summarize the last 30 pages or so of this thread?

Rally back on versus dead cat bounce. Bits for tits.

Am I missing anything important here?
You got it.



365. Post 3939990 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.36h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 12, 2013, 09:42:37 PM
not sure they say we are looking for someone that bought stuff with bitcoin
So they just randomnly started phoning people?  Or somebody who knew you pointed them in your direction?



366. Post 3941458 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on December 12, 2013, 11:25:35 PM
EU bitcoin ATM, is this new?
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/money/business/2013/12/12/4002799/
I didn't know, so tx for the heads up.



367. Post 3942783 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on December 13, 2013, 01:16:38 AM
One big move on China now and it goes kerblamo.

Like this:?
"Woman: "Uhhh (moaning), I'm cumming...."
Man: "Kerblamo!!!""
Lol, that was the bit at the start but I think most of it went down her leg Smiley
Dudes, keep it civilized please.



368. Post 3943527 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 13, 2013, 03:01:41 AM
The only good thing right now is that DGC is rallying..

Ew.

200k+ in my wallet and it's 10 folds where I bought it  Kiss

Probably time to get rid of those.

Although I have no idea how, since 200k is more than the daily volume.

Nope, I might get rid 16k over 200k I have if BTC continues to go against my position today, the rest is for long term.

what makes you think this coin has a future?
Entertainment value



369. Post 3943738 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 13, 2013, 03:20:12 AM
Why not Dogecoins?
Oh, I was assuming DGC were Dogecoins.



370. Post 3943751 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 13, 2013, 03:24:15 AM
The scamcoin craze is merely a byproduct of the larger bubble.

Unfortunately you have a good point.

If only there were ways to short sell anything besides LTC.
I would be all over it...  
Please somebody, introduce shorting for these coins... pretty please? Cry  (and preferably in put options form, normals shorts with this volatility is likely suicide)



371. Post 3944638 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: nanobrain on December 13, 2013, 05:12:49 AM
Well, this is not funny anymore, I definitely shorted BTC at very bad time  Cry

Well, it is certainly sad when you have to learn the hard way.

It's not like tons of us here don't try to drill it into everyone . . .

Don't. Short. Bitcoin.

I honestly hope you can close your short on the retrace.

I made quite lot of money of doing all kind of shit with BTC so I don't really care about "Don't sell BTC" policy at all. Sometimes you lose, sometimes you win, I would be nowhere without risks I am taking all the time, my BTC would be worth approx. the losing position I am at now - few thousands, so nothing. I only wish I shorted just my stake of BTC without margin stuff, wouldn't be too worried then at all.

But thanks for wishes, I certainly do hope it too Cheesy

He said don't 'short' BTC not sell...if you get confused between the two I suggest saving yourself some time and giving your money to a deserving charity. Wink

It's a common misconception here on the forum to interchange "shorting" and "selling".  I remember epic debates to get people to accept that there is a difference between the two.



372. Post 3952934 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on December 13, 2013, 07:14:06 PM
The points I'd seen in it are all fair and justified , much along the lines of "don't invest more than you can afford to lose" and "practice good security" along with "if you lose everything don't come crying to us". Some of the press are trying to turn it into a horror story but most seem fair in the report and the examples they use.
Agreed, I am not saying that I think it is impossible or even unlikely that authorities will clamp down on bitcoin in the future, but so far all the warnings seem sensible and understandable.  Don't forget that there are a lot of stupid people out there who are extremely bad at assessing risks, and bitcoin is definitely risky...



373. Post 3953597 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Xer0 on December 13, 2013, 08:27:10 PM
booring! any idea what to spent ones time on now? i mean this real life thingy...
No need for meatspace, I think we'll have fireworks soon enough...



374. Post 3958624 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Harley997 on December 14, 2013, 04:30:01 AM
seems altcoins are dropping across the board..... any idea if this means anything?
returning to some form of sanity....



375. Post 3958745 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Harley997 on December 14, 2013, 04:39:04 AM
seems altcoins are dropping across the board..... any idea if this means anything?
returning to some form of sanity....
but in regards to bitcoin?
You mean that Altcoin over bitcoin ratio is going down, correct?
For me that means we are returning to a more normal level of speculation. 
I think many altcoins were being heavily overhyped/pumped.



376. Post 3958773 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Harley997 on December 14, 2013, 04:59:34 AM
seems altcoins are dropping across the board..... any idea if this means anything?
returning to some form of sanity....
but in regards to bitcoin?
You mean that Altcoin over bitcoin ratio is going down, correct?
For me that means we are returning to a more normal level of speculation.  
I think many altcoins were being heavily overhyped/pumped.
yeah yeah, i get that, my thoughts too. what im asking is, do you think this has any relevance to the btc/usd ratio?
My speculation is that we'll go down a bit from here, but not nearly as much as the alts.  But who knows really, this is bitcoin  Smiley.



377. Post 3958784 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on December 14, 2013, 05:01:42 AM

We will have to agree to disagree: i) For you cryptographically signed messages have no significance, ii) for me they have a very strong significance.

Legally binding in USA
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/7001

And much of the world
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signatures_and_law
That's good to know, thanks man!



378. Post 3965132 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: seleme on December 14, 2013, 05:05:05 PM
DGC is DigitalCoin, not DogeCoin. Dogecoin is shit, but lulz Cheesy
You insult DogeCoin?  Shocked  Angry
You shouldn't insult DogeCoin, it's too wow !



379. Post 3971953 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: Nolo on December 15, 2013, 04:40:18 AM
What does the new white line on bitcoinwisdom represent?

What new line? I don't see it..  Huh

Screenshot?
looks like the middle between bid and ask lines



380. Post 3972010 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

looks to me like the floor is about to drop from under this thing.



381. Post 3972044 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: Voodah on December 15, 2013, 04:51:03 AM
looks to me like the floor is about to drop from under this thing.

You out?
Only with my trading money.  Vast majority of my savings is still in BTC.
EDIT: it's fun to use the term "vast majority", makes it sound as if my savings are vast too  Wink



382. Post 3972082 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: I_bitcoin on December 15, 2013, 04:53:11 AM
As happy as I am that we have some famous people pimping coin.   you are not making serious decisions based off this?   Surely you would think of the fundamentals.   What would Warren Buffet say if he could see you right now?
"My god you look ugly" ?



383. Post 3983499 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: macsga on December 15, 2013, 10:08:24 PM
moon $1000
mars $10000



I'm looking at this picture and all I can think is "why the F would we want to go there?"

the human race has an instinctive drive to explore and experiment
its what got us this far
its what will insure our survival
its fucking important
This is the "Official OFFTOPIC thread" so here's my thought:

Because if for some unfortunate reason <your favorite destructive scenario here>, something happens in THIS planet there will be the seed for the society to be rebuilt.

Better make sure you pick the right co-astronaut for the trip, just in case...




384. Post 3983746 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: proudhon on December 15, 2013, 11:11:40 PM
Better make sure you pick the right co-astronaut for the trip, just in case...

That one.  I pick that one.
Haha, I know right? 
Too bad her character on "the newsroom" spouts a lot of nonsense about economics, otherwise I might have considered her as a candidate for the future Mrs. Spaceman  Wink .



385. Post 3992581 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Looks like we got some action going on today.



386. Post 3993113 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: joburgtaxi on December 16, 2013, 03:06:59 PM


Sorry for my ignorance but what does this chart actually mean?
Shouldn't we make a sticky out of the answer to this question?  



387. Post 3993254 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 16, 2013, 03:13:56 PM
Sorry for my ignorance but what does this chart actually mean?
Shouldn't we make a sticky out of the answer to this question?  

yes you should



388. Post 3994358 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: Rannasha on December 16, 2013, 04:28:13 PM
"Drink real beer, pay with virtual money."

Too bad that what Heineken makes can't really be called beer ^^
If only they were as good at making beer as at marketing...



389. Post 3994979 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: San1ty on December 16, 2013, 05:18:46 PM

In defense of Heineken: Those who think it's "total shit" obviously never drank a really bad beer.

It's bland. Not really great. Bit watery. But far from completely shit, I would say.

Heineken is bland!?!?

lol wtf is wrong with your taste buds.

Heineken is so rich even i can't drink it, and i'm Canadian!  

You my friend, are in dire need of some beerducation. Please come and pay a visit to Belgium and I'll blow your frikkin mind!
Belgian beer is indeed the best.  Czech beer (Pilsner Urquell) is pretty good too.



390. Post 3995040 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

in other news: china making new lows.



391. Post 3995058 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: lemonte on December 16, 2013, 05:27:22 PM
Let me be the first to draw lines of comparison between the smell of Heineken and mariGuana. These are a great combo.  Grin

As an American, let me also say that Heineken is (agreeing with Oda.Krell) no where near a 'crap beer'. For that try any of the old school big three lager piss beers (Bud, Miller, Coors...) that American was mostly known for in the last many decades (until we got some truly wonderful microbreweries, as mentioned).

http://www.gooseisland.com - Honkers is currently my favourite American beer.

Sorry, going really off topic. If anyone fancies it we could start a beer/ale thread.
As long as you are not having a monologue or duologue (is that a word?) , nothing is off-topic in this thread.



392. Post 3995212 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Stamp going down too.



393. Post 3995217 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: seleme on December 16, 2013, 05:40:07 PM
China is dumping hard. Gox is strong as steel Cheesy

wont be for so long, just watch out Smiley

I made 70 BTC yesterday on DGC. I couldn't give a flying one about it to be honest, I'm not yet ready to become filthy rich anyway  Grin
wow, nice.



394. Post 3995539 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

somebody wants to be rid of goxbux.



395. Post 3995653 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

big dump on stamp.



396. Post 3995768 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on December 16, 2013, 06:14:24 PM
Gox should be near $700 right now. WTF is happening?

This one man panicker is probably about to get raped Smiley
Yes, the market is always just 1 guy  Roll Eyes .



397. Post 3995812 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

I am recharging my BTCs  Smiley.  

Now up Up UP again  Grin



398. Post 3996135 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

My guess is we are done dumping for the day.



399. Post 3996254 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 16, 2013, 06:42:48 PM
My guess is we are done dumping for the day.

So it was your bad mojo that started the dumping again?!?!?!
Lately, my mojo has been pretty good actually (just shouldn't have fallen asleep at the wheel to $1300-1400).



400. Post 3996347 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: Wekkel on December 16, 2013, 06:50:55 PM
@Adam for what is this countdown?

its almost over.

1


lol, nice one  Grin !



401. Post 3996394 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: Wekkel on December 16, 2013, 06:52:46 PM

lol, nice one  Grin !

Epic grammar error included  Roll Eyes
I am assuming you had that picture waiting for the right moment?



402. Post 3996480 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: Vigil on December 16, 2013, 06:59:53 PM
How does the Chinese government proclaim to everyone through government videos, the great and amazing Bitcoin, only to outlaw its use a few months later?
I think they like bitcoin as a reserve currency versus the USD, but not as an escape against capital controls.  So they want to make sure they have all the info on people holding them.



403. Post 3996590 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: Vigil on December 16, 2013, 07:02:06 PM
How does the Chinese government proclaim to everyone through government videos, the great and amazing Bitcoin, only to outlaw its use a few months later?
I think they like bitcoin as a reserve currency versus the USD, but not as an escape against capital controls.  So they want to make sure they have all the info on people holding them.
They have told merchants that they are not allowed to price their goods in Bitcoin... nor can people purchase bitcoin through their bank accounts. What then is the point?
Are banks "third party payment companies"?  Or do they just mean stuff like dwolla, paypal, okpay or whatever the equivalent in China is?  



404. Post 3996757 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

If I were chinese I would buy the BTC, withdraw, and then sell OTC, since there won't be any other ways for getting BTC for chinese people in the future.



405. Post 3996824 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 16, 2013, 07:19:49 PM
If I were chinese I would buy the BTC, withdraw, and then sell OTC, since there won't be any other ways for getting BTC for chinese people in the future.

Who is going to buy your BTC? It's not like they can give you a crappy rate and turn around and sell them on the exchanges, can they? We were silly to be so gung how about China in the first place.
Someone who wants to own assets that can escape capital controls.  A rich chinese guy that thinks about a future abroad.



406. Post 3997206 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 16, 2013, 07:32:15 PM
If I were chinese I would buy the BTC, withdraw, and then sell OTC, since there won't be any other ways for getting BTC for chinese people in the future.

if no new money can flow into btcchina, but people can still withdraw money, btcchina is going to near 0. and some luck chinese guy will buy everyone bitcoin really cheap b4 btcchina is forced to close its doors.

this is going to be brutal...

Seriously dude?  You are saying the bitcoins are worth nothing to people in china or foreigners who have funds there?  



407. Post 3997391 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on December 16, 2013, 07:49:56 PM
Dear BTC China valued customer: To stabilize the recent turbulent Bitcoin market and minimize potential market manipulation, BTC China will end the 0% trading fee promotion, effective immediately, and revert to the 0.3% trading fee. We deeply apologize for the sudden change. BTC China, December 16, 2013


that seems bullish..less whales operating with 0% fee ... I think the Chinese government ensured they got there hands on cheap coins lol

or: we realize our business is over, so we want to make some money at the end of it.  Sorry for screwing you.



408. Post 3997461 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.39h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 16, 2013, 07:56:13 PM
This feels surreal. I lose $-value and don't care, as I accumulate BTC.
I am jumping in and out, trying to catch the tops and bottoms, but often sell below, what I previously bought for, the make the next leg.
I'm up additional BTC0.652 so far

I'm up 3BTC, and down more money then I ever had in my life in dollars. I am unsure how to feel about that.
+1, guess time will tell.



409. Post 3998688 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.40h):

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-12-16/bitcoin-banged-bear-market-again-precious-metals-rise

I love how some zerohedge articles pull these correlations out of their ass.  



410. Post 3999252 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.40h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on December 16, 2013, 09:22:28 PM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-12-16/bitcoin-banged-bear-market-again-precious-metals-rise

I love how some zerohedge articles pull these correlations out of their ass.  

Interesting, it shows the exact opposite of the long term charts, maybe trying to set a precedent for an inverse relationship between PM's and BTC? Gold parity was the breaking point, it'll be interesting to see how much more news tries to push an inverse relationship.

Ok, PMs and bitcoin correlations are definitely interesting, but zerohedge (or one of the Tylers at least) can draw the most idiotic consequences sometimes in random noise.  I don't remember the article, but in April boom they tried to correlate daily bitcoin movement with some minor macro trend, while there was much more relevant purely bitcoin related news going on, completely lost my respect for them back then.



411. Post 4025680 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Damn, why did I sleep through all the action?
And more importantly, why didn't I place the low bids around $400 that I intended to put there?  Didn't see us go down this fast...



412. Post 4052294 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: jojo69 on December 20, 2013, 03:31:40 AM
BTChina up 95% from the low 30 hours ago. Seems legit.

seems like bitcoin

Bitcoin scores high on the hot-crazy scale.



413. Post 4067991 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: nanobrain on December 21, 2013, 04:06:59 AM
If Dogecoin was so genius, Bitcoin could just incorporate it's algorithms or whatever, while maintaining all the advantages that Bitcoin already has (first mover, infrastructure, media attention, currency acceptance, etc.).

But it wouldn't be called Dogecoin, which is precisely why Dogecoin is such a great investment.  Wink Wink Wink

It does have that intrinsic name value that no one can counterfeit.  Very good observation..   Cheesy

Howdy y'all Smiley

I still cant work out if its mean tot be Doggy Coin or Dodgy Coin....either way its pretty shit...
Its Daugecoin.  Either way it's so wow



414. Post 4141937 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.46h):

chart looking pretty darn bullish (short term at least)

EDIT: the buildup from last few days looks bullish, but we have some resistance here from the downward tops since peak.



415. Post 4145187 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.46h):

I can only imagine the confusion of a bitcoin noob when he or she visits the forums, and is not only faced with the technical jargon about bitcoin, but all the meme-speak (and "obvious" trolling)  too   Smiley .



416. Post 4276475 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.50h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on January 02, 2014, 08:45:38 PM
Is there such a thing as a butthurt bull in a bull market? I think I am one of those. I am long term bullish. I know that Bitcoin will go up, way up. I know that  I need more BTC. I have fiat ready. Yet, I still can't buy back in now, after that sell a couple of weeks ago, when 580 looked like the top of a dead cat bounce...  Undecided

GAAAAAAAA........

You went full fiat?



417. Post 4276608 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.50h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on January 02, 2014, 08:53:32 PM
Is there such a thing as a butthurt bull in a bull market? I think I am one of those. I am long term bullish. I know that Bitcoin will go up, way up. I know that  I need more BTC. I have fiat ready. Yet, I still can't buy back in now, after that sell a couple of weeks ago, when 580 looked like the top of a dead cat bounce...  Undecided

GAAAAAAAA........

You went full fiat?

Yes, full fiat with my trading allotment. The sad thing, I thought I was being clever, having placed a number of limit orders, selling gradually on the way up, and it did look like 580 was going to be a top, but then everything went horribly wrong.
At least you kept your LT stash.  



418. Post 4276725 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.50h):

Quote from: thefunkybits on January 02, 2014, 09:01:00 PM
Volume enough for you yet?

lol nope, gox still under 10K
What is this gox you speak of?



419. Post 4294379 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.50h):

Quote from: Odalv on January 03, 2014, 08:44:26 PM
A lot of 502 Bad Gateway when trying to read bitcointalk. Is it only me ?
same here



420. Post 4314841 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.50h):

Quote from: niothor on January 04, 2014, 10:18:03 PM
This Peter Wynn character just has to suffer some unfortunate mental disorder. He speculates that BitPay added a backdoor for Zynga and that's how money disappeared from his BTC-e account because BitPay also has a backdoor to BTC-e, or something CRAZY. His profile says he's a "crypto prodigy", but people are having to explain password hashing to him. Meanwhile he seems to tweet about once per 15 seconds. Could be a manic episode maybe?

I really don't understand why there isn't any major drugstore chain accepting Bitcoin.
There are lots of people who need lots of pills in this community.
lol  Grin

That's not true !  Obviously you are part of the Illuminati and are trying to discredit the bitcoin crowd!  Wink



421. Post 4325690 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: fognozz on January 05, 2014, 02:07:45 PM
I hope you paid for that donkey with BTC!

Of course he did....except that it was with BTCurroCoin.... Grin
Also known as Asscoin, the little brother of  



422. Post 4325727 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: molecular on January 05, 2014, 02:23:20 PM
i think many guys here are really calm holding bulls because they bought under 10 USD...so it is little bit more easy to hodl i think...

It's irrelevant at what price you bought for deciding whether or not to hold an investment.

It depends on the person. I have more money than I have ever had in my life invested in Bitcoin. Had I earned that money through a regular job, there is no way I would consider putting it all into Bitcoin. But since it came so easy, it wouldn't hurt so much if I lost it all.

Probably how I would feel too. It's not rational however Smiley

It's not rational at all, but I feel the same way. I've been trying to ask myself if I had all my bitcoin-value in FIAT... would I buy as many bitcoins as I own now? Answer is usually: no, not even close, I wouldn't.

Then why am I not selling? Well, I actually am, but I can't bring myself to sell even close to the required amount. Why? Well, I guess I probably learned by pain through past experience that selling Bitcoin is not a good idea.

Selling precious coins when you're a bull is extremely hard. Harder than "not buying" even though you're bullish, I guess.
Same here, psychology matters.



423. Post 4326331 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Damn !



424. Post 4333162 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Anyone else having a hard time keeping up with all of the latest developments?

By the way, another runup in price so close after the previous "bubble" would be crazy!
But hey: "madness?  This is BITCOIN !".



425. Post 4333825 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: mb300sd on January 05, 2014, 10:23:50 PM
Just found out that I leveraged up while blackout last night Grin

drunk trading FTW
Haha, hilarious (and lucky).



426. Post 4333866 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on January 05, 2014, 10:15:54 PM
Anyone else having a hard time keeping up with all of the latest developments?

By the way, another runup in price so close after the previous "bubble" would be crazy!
But hey: "madness?  This is BITCOIN !".


lol  Cheesy



427. Post 4336150 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.51h):

Quote from: "Default Trust" is Tyrannically Centralized! (goat) on January 06, 2014, 12:16:45 AM
DogeCoin will be a funny but dead meme in 4 years:)

DogeCoin is lulz, but it's ridiculous that it has a 6 million dollar valuation.



428. Post 4375938 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Quote from: magicmexican on January 07, 2014, 11:14:00 PM
Its been extremely frustrating hodling a 60/40 position for the past week. The first 4 days I left $250/coin on the table by not buying and the past 2 days I have left $200/coin on the table by not selling and now I am almost back to where I started with nothing to show for it but stress when I could have made a fortune.

Thinking about imaginary profits is not healthy Cheesy As a poker player, at one point, i had 200k almost "locked up" @95/5% odds but 5% happened. Took some time to shake it off.

Jezus.  Congrats on keeping your sanity  Wink . (although of course I don't know what percentage of your capital 200k represents)



429. Post 4388365 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Quote from: gizmoh on January 08, 2014, 02:13:33 PM

What makes you think that new people are here only for profit and not to support great idea which bitcoin is.

support a great idea v/s profit .. knowing that its each people's money/savings , the answer is clear  Cheesy
Can't we do both?



430. Post 4389892 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Hi guys,

I think there is a need for a thread where people can get up to speed with the latest news (especially when you came back from holliday or after a busy period at work), without having to dig through hundreds of posts, so I created this thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=405268.new#new

have fun !



431. Post 4390280 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Quote from: humanitee on January 08, 2014, 04:09:02 PM
3 hours left for Gox to hit 750<. If some divine intervention will prevent it, i will be expecting my 1 btc from CoinBull.

Let's make a bet on whether or not CoinBull pays out.  Cheesy

I'm going with "no."
I'll make that bet too  Grin



432. Post 4390352 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.53h):

Quote from: magicmexican on January 08, 2014, 04:17:59 PM
3 hours left for Gox to hit 750<. If some divine intervention will prevent it, i will be expecting my 1 btc from CoinBull.

Let's make a bet on whether or not CoinBull pays out.  Cheesy

I'm going with "no."
I'll make that bet too  Grin

i ll take that bet with 20:1 odds
If I were coinbull, I would take your bet  Grin



433. Post 4420163 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: San1ty on January 09, 2014, 11:26:08 PM
While reddit is panicking about a potential 51% Attack by GHASH... No-one notices that fiat is under a permanent 100% attack!
Haha, nice one !  Paradigm shift bitchez :-).



434. Post 4456389 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on January 11, 2014, 10:01:02 PM
Anyway anybody with half a brain probably gets it by looking at this chart:

These type of charts need log-scale or something similar.  I would be much more interested in knowing what the average yearly % increase in monetary supply is, than a chart that says "omfg, look how high this goes".



435. Post 4456633 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.54h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on January 11, 2014, 11:26:58 PM
something
agreed.
Speechless...



436. Post 4474320 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Sorry for the off-topic, but does anyone know a good/cheap/safe way to transfer credit card money to regular bank account money (US)?  Or to bitcoins?  Trying to help out a friend.



437. Post 4474790 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.55h):

Thanks guys !



438. Post 5025438 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Timberrrr



439. Post 5031891 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: isov on February 09, 2014, 08:07:36 AM
Obviously its Americans who are buying the fuck out of bitcoin. Kinda pisses me off that this spread reaches it's peak when I want to be buying and when I pulled the last of my coins out of Gox, the spread was the other way so I lose the spread every fucking time. But make no mistake, it's supply and demand and the yanks are coming.

Coinbase account holders have access to our bank accounts and can buy all we want and we're obviously buying the hell out of this drop. Once again, we have to bail out Europe and the rest of the world. Getting to be a habit. You ungrateful bastards can still suck it when the dollar fails and we still get to keep world reserve currency status!

In Europe, we have an exchange, we have ATMs and there are several European countries with greater adoption per capita. Check sourceforge.

Once again, we have to bail out Europe and the rest of the world.

Once again???

From Nazis, Commies, etc.  Those crosses on the cliffs over Normandy aren't just landscaping.
But ummm you kindalike are europeans if we think about history? It's just a matter of how long you wanna go. Or are you saying you we're in normandy?
Your reasoning is too rational.  
The main thing to remember is that he is a hero, and the rest of us are shit.



440. Post 5033137 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: phyros on February 09, 2014, 10:20:18 AM
LOL. You can say what you want about us yanks, but tonight, the line was held by Americans at Coinbase. I probably hate my government worse than you do, but I've never been more proud of my countrymen.

Are concepts like national pride and patriotism really needed in Bitcoinland? I don't think so.
+1
+2



441. Post 5040821 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 09, 2014, 06:50:42 PM
It is mathematically inevitable that debt-based monetary systems will explode.  It does not require any particular economic theory or political ideology to recognize this, merely mathematical literacy.
Those be some strong claims.  Doubts about them, I have.
I am presuming you are talking about the "where does the money come from to pay the interest"-situation.



442. Post 5041485 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 09, 2014, 07:39:42 PM
Those be some strong claims.  Doubts about them, I have.
I am presuming you are talking about the "where does the money come from to pay the interest"-situation.
That is a major component.  In and of itself, it would not make collapse inevitable, but it forms the foundation upon which collapse is built.
The system was designed to rent-seek in the margin, draining the energy made available by economic growth, on an exponential growth model.
The system can no longer work as designed, because the exponential growth assumption has reached end-of-life.  The energy available is declining.
It could in hypothetical principle be adapted, modified, to conform to the new material conditions; however, other factors make that impossible,
in particular the fragility of low-diversity tightly coupled systems:
Ok, so a "Chris Martenson crash course" view, if I can summarize it as such.  Me being a little know-it-all b*tch, I have to point out that this takes into account several other aspects of the world, besides the purely mathematical (which you already admitted).  I am not saying I disagree with you, just that "mathematical certainty" gets thrown around too quickly, when it's really the underlying model that should be the object of discussion.  

Quote from: aminorex on February 09, 2014, 07:39:42 PM
It is useful to characterize ecological systems by their path through a three-dimensional phase-space, the axes of which are energy requirements, interconnectedness, and diversity.   Ecological systems, incorporating predator-prey dynamics, are attracted to a lemniscate path through this phase space.  When energy requirements approach the limits of available energy, interconnectedness is high, and diversity is low, the system is reaching a catastrophic portion of the trajectory, and a very rapid motion to a loosely-coupled, low-energy, high-diversity region ensues.  
The predators are about to become carrion, upon which a new diversity will feed.
Ok, I 'll need some more time to process this, has an interesting ring to it (although I'll probably just forget to do it)  Undecided.
Thanks for the nice reply.  Wink



443. Post 5044518 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

I like how we are going back to discussing society etc. instead of randomnly shouting out  "HODL!".  There is hope for us yet  Wink.
Big swings in your capital and talking about it is fun and all, but only speaking about bulls and bears gets boring after a while  Smiley.



444. Post 5062462 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Craziness....



445. Post 5125882 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: mah87 on February 13, 2014, 07:56:51 PM
Bitcoin protocol failure ? Mtgox bankruptcy ? Bitstamp illegal activity inside EU ? Sure;;; bitcoin will go far.... FAR CLOSE TO 10$

What Bitstamp stuff are you talking about?



446. Post 5126074 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: niothor on February 13, 2014, 08:07:40 PM

Double bottoms and no girl pics ... this is bearish indeed
I know right?



447. Post 5126109 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: njcarlos on February 13, 2014, 08:09:25 PM
<butt ugly image>
Dude, are you trying to get more ignores than Fonzie?



448. Post 5126171 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: njcarlos on February 13, 2014, 08:11:31 PM
Dude, are you trying to get more ignores than Fonzie?
I thought it was quite fitting, no? If I had to describe BTC market atm, it'd be with that. Tongue
It was very fitting (and funny), but you can't undo the damage of seeing something like that, it burns horrible pictures in your retina forever  Lips sealed.



449. Post 5126203 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: niothor on February 13, 2014, 08:13:56 PM
Dude, are you trying to get more ignores than Fonzie?
I thought it was quite fitting, no? If I had to describe BTC market atm, it'd be with that. Tongue

Seriously , get rid of that image. The thread is already bearish , no need for more man fur.
Nice one  Grin



450. Post 5129209 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on February 13, 2014, 10:32:05 PM
dead bull

can someone please ban this guy? wtf

you eat meat everyday, what are you afraid of?  Undecided

I also ask this question when people get scared by killed animals / dead animal corpses.
Unfortunately I will never understand why people can eat animals but never want to see the ugly side of eating meat.

psychological distancing and or naive behaviors.
Dudes, if you eat a rotting cow you are gonna end up on the ground next to it.... .



451. Post 5129241 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: niothor on February 13, 2014, 10:47:46 PM

And again they are charging almost double than using a credit card .

Anyone have a clue as to why they do this?



452. Post 5149080 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: 7thKingdom on February 14, 2014, 08:31:46 PM
It was a pretty easy turnaround for those interested.  That said, now that the price has come back to earth a bit after the quick jump up to 720ish, this is when things get interesting.  These are the times when imo it becomes difficult to gauge the market and predict which direction it's going to go.  Last night was childs play (in terms of making the smart move).  This is where the men separate themselves from the boys, being able to make the correct play right about now.

Unfortunately, I'm not sure I have any insight lol

Agreed, I have been doing fine trading so far (unfortunately, I always make my best trades when I am playing around with some spare dimes instead of putting in a larger proportion--> that's when I fail spectacularly), but right now I find it harder to making the call and feel "pretty sure" about it.  
Sentiment has come down quite a bit the past week, which was needed I think.



453. Post 5167394 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 15, 2014, 10:37:44 PM
No stock trader cares for, or even cares to know, the past history of the price of a stock. One cannot use ancient price history to justify a claim of future price increase.  Indeed, resorting to that argument only highlights the lack of any real justification for that claim.
True


Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 15, 2014, 10:37:44 PM
Bitcoin is still a terrible investment, because there is no reason to believe that the price will increase, and several reasons for which it may decrease.

The cause for the increase from 17$ to 1200$ is obvious: the opening of the Chinese market by BTC-China, OKCoin and Huobi.  That was basic economics: larger market, fixed supply = higher price.  What event is expected to happen that could propel the price much higher than 700$?
You don't give any arguments.  All you seem to be saying is : "I don't see the value in BTC, and I think markets are saturated".




454. Post 5167987 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.10h):

Quote from: fonzie on February 15, 2014, 11:26:09 PM
BTW: You“re actually quite famous? Is that you? Shocked

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorge_Stolfi
Seems to fit the description, cool CV (and field of work).



455. Post 5179794 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

Quote from: delphic on February 16, 2014, 04:05:31 PM
Everybody will agree that the chance of snake eyes at dice is 1/36, for example.  While diferent people will assign different probabilities to "a whale will fall from the sky into the Grand Canyon",  most will pick a very small number.
This recent BBC article may interest you.

'Scientists count whales from space' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-26075274

And I didn't even know that whales came from space.  Wink
Depends on whether or not the whale observer is a hitchhiker....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCsfHVM5x_I



456. Post 5185150 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.11h):

Quote from: delphic on February 16, 2014, 04:26:38 PM
Everybody will agree that the chance of snake eyes at dice is 1/36, for example.  While diferent people will assign different probabilities to "a whale will fall from the sky into the Grand Canyon",  most will pick a very small number.
This recent BBC article may interest you.

'Scientists count whales from space' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-26075274

And I didn't even know that whales came from space.  Wink
Depends on whether or not the whale observer is a hitchhiker....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCsfHVM5x_I
Yes, I was thinking about HHGTTG too.

I presume you are a fellow Brit... or maybe a spaceman.

Didn't Star Trek make a film about a whale too? I am detecting a pattern here. Maybe the extraterrestrial Illuminati are whales, not lizards. The evidence is growing.

Non-brittish spaceman here.  I have been suspecting those alien whales too for some time now, bunch of manipulative bastards...



457. Post 5206416 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.12h):

Quote from: traderCJ on February 17, 2014, 09:02:08 PM
Wouldnt it be hilarious if they just started fiat withdrawals as well.

It'd be even funnier if the announcement stated that there had been a huge misunderstanding: work is only being done on improve the fiat withdrawal system and that they were previously unaware of BTC withdrawal issues.

lulz  Grin



458. Post 5265200 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Holy fuck people...
What's the word on Gox, no announcement?

I abandoned Gox about half a year ago, due to their constant bullshitting which I found untrustworthy, but with this price, I am actually starting to contemplate depositing some money over there, just in case they are functional after all...  



459. Post 5265291 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: molecular on February 20, 2014, 07:06:15 PM
Holy fuck people...
What's the word on Gox, no announcement?

I abandoned Gox about half a year ago, due to their constant bullshitting which I found untrustworthy, but with this price, I am actually starting to contemplate depositing some money over there, just in case they are functional after all...  

Maybe it's just a trick to get some fiat wired to their bank accounts?

Could very well be.  It's not like I am ready to pull the trigger real soon either, just that at these possible profit levels, I am starting to think about it.

Quote from: F-bernanke on February 20, 2014, 07:07:09 PM
Please don't feed the cancer.
Lol  Grin



460. Post 5265382 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: sir faps on February 20, 2014, 07:10:18 PM
Do you people expect the GOX price to move more than 50% when the withdrawals are enabled? Ha. The other exchanges will fall by at least 300%
Bitcoin cannot fall 300% unless you are leveraging. This is extremely basic algebra
FTFY

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on February 20, 2014, 07:10:56 PM
Tom Petty - Free falling
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lWJXDG2i0A
Undoubtedly this has been posted before here today, but this seems very appropriate KoziTwo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2ku1A5Ox8U



461. Post 5266191 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on February 20, 2014, 07:42:57 PM
Heh and just today after listening to it I sent you a small tip, asking myself "I wonder what she'll do with that money"  Grin Who would have guessed.
IIRC, Kozi is not the one that actually sung the song, but made the lyrics.  So could be a "he" too.



462. Post 5266247 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: mah87 on February 20, 2014, 07:52:25 PM
I'd like to suggest some calming music during these crazy Bitcoin times:

Elvis Costello - I Can't Stand Up For Falling Down

Tom Petty - Freefalling

Tom Waits - Down Down Down

and when it gets really bad:
the doors - this is the end

Yazoo - The only way is up!

bottom is 0 not 115 or 570
Someone is looking for cheap coins...  Roll Eyes



463. Post 5266495 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: mah87 on February 20, 2014, 08:00:21 PM
bottom is 0 not 115 or 570
Someone is looking for cheap coins...  Roll Eyes

some bulls said that when gox was at 500, then 400, then 300 then ...
I am not making any market predictions here, I am just stating that your way of speaking makes me think that you are a FUD'er who wants cheap coins.



464. Post 5268725 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: humanitee on February 20, 2014, 09:50:17 PM
Will the price ever be $1k again on Stamp?

How long will that take? Wondering if it will be worth the wait. Why and when, or why not?

Yes. At least 6 months.
I agwee.



465. Post 5269267 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: Arcas on February 20, 2014, 10:22:17 PM
Who is brave enough to catch it?

I am just lying there, waiting for the knife to fall on me  Wink .



466. Post 5370120 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 25, 2014, 07:37:03 PM

Is it me or is Martin enjoying that situation?



467. Post 5371722 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 25, 2014, 08:56:12 PM
BFX down for anyone else?  I can't reach it or bitcoinwisdom.
both fine



468. Post 5372438 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat on February 25, 2014, 09:46:04 PM
but you have to admit the goat shitting all over the M logo is lulz.
Yer gox.com ?



469. Post 5375558 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Booom



470. Post 5376108 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: prof7bit on February 26, 2014, 01:48:14 AM
¹) This is how I imagine their wallet worked (and how it fucked up):

User initiates withdrawal:

* debit amount from user account
* generate new private key for change address and create tx
* store tx in database (indexed by txid)
* store private key in database (indexed by address, foreign_key=txid)
* push tx to network

a week later (cron job)

* for all unconfirmed tx older than 1 week:
*     credit BTC back to customer account
*     delete "invalid" tx
*         -> cascaded delete "unused" change address and its private key (ouch!)

run 2 years until wallet is dry, all supposed UTXO turn out to be STXO and all real UTXO are in nirvana already.
That scenario would be seriously bullish long term



471. Post 5396664 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 27, 2014, 12:25:10 AM
Those funds are no more. They have has ceased to be. They have expired and gone to meet Satoshi. They are late funds. They are vapor. Bereft of existence, they rest in peace. If Karpeles hadn't left them on the balance sheet, they would've been written off ages ago. They've rung down the curtain and joined the choir invisible. They are ex-funds.
They are not gone, just pining for the blockchain...
Beautiful funds, those bitcoins.



472. Post 5396778 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Grafzep on February 26, 2014, 11:05:15 PM
The thing about Jorge is that he’s a provincial academic. In a country outside the G8, at that. Like most minor academics, especially in middle age, there is a tendency to bitterness which they are self-aware enough to hide. They are the losers and they know it.

At one point the potential must have seemed endless. Imagine being in California in the early 80s, studying Math or Computing at Stanford – what possibilities! The world ready throw billions at you and your contemporaries! Who wouldn’t start a company? Who wouldn’t invest in friends? Who wouldn’t risk just a little in their own future?

No, play it safe. Rise above the crass entrepreneurialism. Teach. Head back to a salary, with a pension. You could have done well, of course, if you’d wanted to, but the guiding, year after year, of smiling young faces was its own reward.

And now, another tech revolution unfolds in front of you. You have the understanding and the ability to invest time or money into the idea. But wait – actual involvement? Wet feet? Action? No, no, no. Not me. That would just emphasise all my other missed chances.

No, I’ll snipe from the safety of my tenure. I could have partaken, honestly, but I’m better than that. I’m aware of it, but above it, because, well, I’m an academic.

You have the talent, the time and resources. But you won’t even buy one coin to see what it’s about. You’re wasting your time and ours in a desperate bid to show some kind of superiority. You’ve taken enough advice and explanation with nothing of interest coming back. You’ve had your moment in this thread, presumably because it’s the busiest, but you should have the decency to set up your own and see if anyone will follow and care there.
Are we done bashing academia yet?  I am sure there are plenty of pro-bitcoin people there too (Jerry Brito off the top of my head).




473. Post 5396809 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: creekbore on February 27, 2014, 01:13:24 AM
Those funds are no more. They have has ceased to be. They have expired and gone to meet Satoshi. They are late funds. They are vapor. Bereft of existence, they rest in peace. If Karpeles hadn't left them on the balance sheet, they would've been written off ages ago. They've rung down the curtain and joined the choir invisible. They are ex-funds.
They are not gone, just pining for the blockchain...
Beautiful funds, those bitcoins.


~ PININ' for the Blockchain?!?!?!? What kind of talk is that?, look, why did it fall in value 500% the moment I got 'im to my cold wallet?

~ The Gox-coin prefers kippin' on it's back! Remarkable coin, id'nit, squire? Lovely algorithm!

~ Look, I took the liberty of examining that coin when I got it home, and I discovered the only reason that it had been sitting on its exchange in the first place was that it had been NAILED there.
Grin



474. Post 5411000 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 27, 2014, 06:29:52 PM
You don't see the future implications? I don't support any fork that is not of vital necessity to the protocol. Altering the money supply to bail out people who should have better gauged their counter party risk? No fucking way. If the majority supports this, bitcoin is dead in the water. And I'm out -- in a flash.
+1
+2

Quote from: FTWbitcoinFTW on February 27, 2014, 06:41:51 PM
Because it hasn't been ordered by a court with access to men with guns and unpleasant prisons...yet.

So you need a warrant to fork that FBI/MK/pirate40 coins ?
Tell me more about that
FTW: who gets to decide which are "bad" coins?  Can't you see that the more you turn bitcoin into a political game with rules that are changed every month, the less it becomes something you will always be able to rely on as money?



475. Post 5411479 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 27, 2014, 04:49:45 PM
It's becoming more and more clear that the coins haven't been stolen, they've just lost the keys lol. Once this is confirmed, should be very bullish.

I don't think that the loss of those coins, per se, would have any effect.  

Think of the exchanges as water tanks where water represents bitcoins in the market, and the water level is the inverse price (how many BTC one can buy with one dollar).

The tanks are connected by pipes at the bottom (coin withdrawals and deposits) so the hydrostatic principle (arbitrage) keeps the water level about the same in all tanks. If one pours more water into any tank (brings more coins to the market) the level in all tanks goes up (meaning the price goes down).  The opposite happens if one takes water out of one tank (buys coins and puts them in cold storage).

If the MtGOX theft did happen, then at some point in the past, someone siphoned most of the water out of the MtGOX tank to a private barrel.  I the keys were lost, most of the water in that tank leaked out and was permanetly lost.  In either case, Mark put some bricks into the tank (hid the theft) so that people would not notice the loss, and the water level was not affected.   Then a few days ago the pipes out of that tank  were closed (withdrawals were blocked),  and the tank was disconnected and removed it from the system.   That would not affect the water level in the other tanks either.

If the theft happened, and the thief then dumped the water in other tanks (sold the coins in other markets), then there was indeed a net rise in the water level (a fall in market price); but that is past history.  

We may expect an effect only if the coins were stolen but have not been not sold yet EDIT: and are sold now.

(This analogy is imperfect because it does not model the money flows, but hopefully it is enough to argue the point.)

I disagree.  I think the flaw in your system is that it doesn't incorporate the people.  Maybe the tank with the fake goxcoins was cut off from the system (the bitcoin economy), but the people who thought they had bitcoins @ gox were not.  They still have capital in other parts of the general economy, and if they truly believe in bitcoin, they might want to rebalance the percentage of bitcoins in their capital.

Apart from this, some speculators might use the monetary base as a guideline to determine whether bitcoin is overpriced or not in their thinking.  

Another psychological effect of course might be that people (regardless of whether they had coins at gox or not) perceive bitcoin as a risky thing in which you are bound to get screwed over, and they abandon it.



476. Post 5411648 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on February 27, 2014, 07:13:09 PM
Great time to be lending BTC on bitfinex - it is sitting at an incredible 0.35% daily right now!  That is around 127% APR - compounded daily which would make it an effective annual rate of over 255%!!  Why are more people not lending BTC over there??

The same reason we didn't store bitcoins at Gox.

How big of a threat are wallet stealers? Curious. I keep almost all my coins on exchanges, because i'm paranoid about them.
I think your risk judgement is off.  If you have enough capital in btc, put some effort into a good cold wallet system.



477. Post 5411899 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: delphic on February 27, 2014, 07:28:57 PM
Unless you are trading 100% of your coins regularly, why don't you keep a portion cold?

I will lose anything physical. Almost guaranteed. I have to replace my flash drives monthly because I always lose them...

I keep back-ups encrypted and locked in safes in the homes of two family members. It may sound ridiculous, but it is so easy to do in practice. Why not?
Make sure you share at least 51% of your DNA with them.   Tongue

Or don't share the encryption password.....



478. Post 5415799 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: kehtolo on February 27, 2014, 09:52:31 PM
https://www.bitquick.co/bitquick-co-updates-api-to-show-proof-of-transparency-we-believe-in-making-bitcoin-trading-safe-and-simple

..step in the right direction...
This is the type of stuff that makes bitcoin disruptive: you want an independent audit of a company.  A few lines of code and Pooof, there ya go.  Talk about cost-efficiency and reliability.....



479. Post 5415847 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: fotosonics on February 27, 2014, 11:15:13 PM
Movement

Only if you have been staring at the charts for too long.  Its looking good, don't get me wrong, but this is hardly a clear outbreak yet.



480. Post 5416035 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 27, 2014, 11:24:40 PM

The price is deflationary, and exactly because the supply of bitcoins is inflating while the wealth of the world is increasing.

If the world's "wealth" -- meaning energy consumption -- continues increasing exponentially then we will all die in fire.  If that is your inflationary paradise, we have very different world-views.


I wouldn't equate "wealth" with energy.  I would equate it with having the things people want.  And that is very different from energy.  Production efficiency and scientific progress would increase one's wealth, without necessarily increasing energy ownership or consumption.



Quote from: aminorex on February 27, 2014, 11:24:40 PM
Everyone who knows anything about finance knows that a currency has to "punish savers" to work.
No, everyone who is brainwashed by the Keynesian school "knows" that.  It is a false knowledge, which has never been true, as history demonstrates abundantly.

Saving wealth in money is not good, because money should not be used in saving wealth but used for transacting wealth.
Your complaint about bitcoin boils down to this:  You can't force people to use their savings on what you want them to use it for.  I regard that as a feature, not a bug.

The coin that succeeds is the coin that attracts people by it's utility and use, not because it seems attractive as an speculative investment oportunity.
You don't see the store of wealth use case as a beneficial one.  I do.
+1

PS: Do people hate "+1" comments?  They might seem to be empty of meaning, but I think they matter  Smiley .



481. Post 5416245 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Erdogan on February 27, 2014, 11:42:59 PM
Only if you have been staring at the charts for too long.  Its looking good, don't get me wrong, but this is hardly a clear outbreak yet.
You are either with us or against us.

...or with the terrorists, remember?
By definition, if you are not with us, you are a terrorist  Wink.



482. Post 5416369 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: magicmexican on February 27, 2014, 11:49:22 PM
<RogerVer> On Tuesday Mark told me via text message: Currently filing for bankruptcy and will update based on that
My guess is the shit hit the fan for Gox between the start and the abrupt end of the acquisition of their US customers by Coinlab.
There was probably a reason why they were "reluctant" to turn over those accounts.



483. Post 5460013 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

Trading is a zero-sum game, just like poker.  If you are good at it, you can make tons of dough.  In the end, the only one who is almost guaranteed to win is the house (the exchanges with their fees), unless your initials are M.K. of course...

Quote from: TERA on March 02, 2014, 09:21:32 AM
That's correct.  And yes I've made bad calls. But most of my profit does not come from calling the major reversals in bear markets and bull markets correctly - it actually comes from daytrading during high volume high volatility times when money is flying all over the place and there are literally opportunities to make 1000% profit in a day, especially if you use leverage.  Now take someone who doesn't make 'bad calls' and take someone who only makes good calls (a god) - they might be up 1,000,000% by now in the same time that I took to make 30,000%.
Since traders try to outsmart each other all of the time, even marginally outperforming the market seems like a victory to me...  
Thinking about the potential profits to be made by making every call right will make a man go insane (and it's statistically super-unlikely anyway).  If it were so easy to pick the right moments to buy and sell, everybody could and would do it, and there wouldn't be any real volatility anymore...



484. Post 5471142 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.22h):

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-02/ukraine-capital-control-crunch-largest-bank-limits-cash-withdrawals-100-daily

Bitcoin user not affected...



485. Post 5487916 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Can I hear a CCMF ?  Cheesy

That being said, whether this is the end of the bear market, I don't know.  My gut says 35% bear is over, 65% one final slow capitulation.   But I got my ass kicked trading last summer with similar bearishness, so what do I know.



486. Post 5520397 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 05, 2014, 06:09:47 AM

So, how can one honestly recommend investing into bitcoin as a hedge against a possible dollar collapse, as a way of becoming a millionaire, or whatever the "salesmen" are saying these days?  It is like buying a ticket for a crazy lottery that does not tell its clients what are the odds and prizes, and may or may not be seeking to lose money.
Very nice post about expected value etc. .  Seems to be generating a lot of reaction, probably because you are touching the core of investment.

The thing is: of which investment DO we know the expected value?  Every investment has its risks.  I'll admit that those risks are way way bigger in the crypto space than for other assets, but I am not aware of any investment with an expected value that is positive in real terms (inflation-adjusted).
For sure, if you prime concern is capital preservement, and you dislike volatility, you might want to stay clear of cryptos (or only allocate a small percentage of your capital).  
But every other investment has its risks too.  Housing is probably one of the safest investments you can do, but its valuation depends on the purchasing power of the citizens, lending practices, political stability, taxing policy and worst-case-scenario: nationalization.  Gold used to be the safe-haven investment, but with cryptos around, that might change.  And while not theoretically guaranteed, I think a long history teaches us that the expected value of fiat is negative, though you typically have low volatility.


Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 05, 2014, 06:43:29 AM
That expression .. ."dont let the perfect be the enemy of the good."
Didn't know that expression, but certainly I should have listened to it many times during my life...



487. Post 5527191 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

I never received any spam either (unless my spamfolder already autodeleted the stuff, was it prior to Feb 23rd?).

By the way, what is the deal with Chinese exchanges these days?  I kinda lost track of the developments after the early banning news.   Can fresh money reach the exchanges nowadays?



488. Post 5527458 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

Quote from: tailor on March 05, 2014, 04:09:33 PM
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/03/doomsday-cult-of-bitcoin.html

The above quoted article is such bullshit that it is hardly worth repeating.... Maybe I am guilty of the same but I just wanted to make clear my referent?   Surely, with any movement, there are going to be some people who are true believers, and they have NO basis in fact for their beliefs - however, to put bitcoin in that category and to suggest that a lot of bitcoin followers fall into cultish behavior attempts to poo poo and to minimize a large number of concrete and positive contributions of bitcoin.  

Your outright dismissal of the article is exactly the type of cultish behaviour the author is talking about - dismiss anything that doesn't fit the faith view.

What concrete contributions has bitcoin made? It certainly hasn't changed the world yet, and it's highly unlikely it will without some drastic change to the limited exchange problem. The killer app for BTC could be transferring money online, but that only works if it can be easily converted to local currency.
Give these things time for pete's sake.  A little over a year ago disbelievers were saying that no serious company accepted bitcoin, that you couldn't buy food with it etc. , and that therefore it wasn't useful and had failed....  Now look at overstock.com, food delivery services, etc. ..



489. Post 5568039 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: FierceRadish on March 07, 2014, 11:46:47 AM
kkasper's weekly routine:

Monday
Get up, open laptop, go on Wall Observer, tell everyone they're religious zealots.
Tuesday
Get up, open laptop, go on Wall Observer, tell everyone they're religious zealots.
Wednesday
Get up, open laptop, go on Wall Observer, tell everyone they're religious zealots.
Thursday
Get up, open laptop, go on Wall Observer, tell everyone they're religious zealots.
Friday
Get up, open laptop, go on Wall Observer, tell everyone they're religious zealots.
Saturday
Get up, open laptop, go on Wall Observer, tell everyone they're religious zealots.
Sunday
Get up, have a wank, go back to sleep. Dream about going on Wall Observer and telling everyone they're religious zealots.

Grin



490. Post 5568476 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 07, 2014, 01:26:21 PM
I don't KNOW anything but I think its quite sure that this Dorian guy isn't the real Satoshi. I feel like he is too old and in many other ways it just doesn't seem to add up.

I was quite disappointed by the /Lord of the Rings/ movie too, the characters did not look at all like I had imagined them.  Smiley
Somehow, hobbits used to be green in my mind  Grin.  Loved the overall feel of the movie though (except for the Frodo-Sam lovefest  Wink).



491. Post 5586170 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: tarmi on March 08, 2014, 12:28:59 PM
whats up guys? so quiet here...

everybody shorting?
Boring price action is boring.



492. Post 5586721 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: mmitech on March 08, 2014, 01:28:35 PM
in other notes, I am watching the Litecoin volume over the last few months, and I am amazed how Litecoin is developing http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/v2/coins/graphicalComparison

they count the volume of LTC/USD and LTC/BTC and they convert everything back to BTC and compare it to the BTC volume, so it is not 1 LTC compared to 1 BTC but it is 1BTC invested in litecoin instead.

I am guessing the bigger volatility makes it a preferred day-traders toy.



493. Post 5589126 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: aminorex on March 08, 2014, 04:00:10 PM
Bitcoins on sale!  50% off and more! How can we do it? volume volume volume! Because we are craaaazzzzyyyy!
Doing the obnoxious american salesman bit?



494. Post 5589850 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on March 08, 2014, 04:58:59 PM
+1 for Szabo - who knows, but he's my lead candidate

My speculation on Bitcoin's origin is that Nick Szabo is merely a mouthpiece for the true genius living chained in shame within the walls of his parent's attic. By combing hospital records I've determined Nick likely has an otherwise unknown older brother, inbred, and grotesquely malformed. Though the sad creature is a horror to behold it is all the more brilliant.

Scandalous guilt drove the family to imprison it at birth, to keep it hid away from the world. Little did they know its financial acumen could not be denied.

The family barely tended to its secret humiliation. Supplied with the barest of essentials (plus an occasional odd math book or two which Nick rummaged from a nearby abandoned schoolhouse), it never learned to speak, only muttering husky grunts.  Nick thought the monster knew only gibberish until 18 years had passed. Nick, now living on his own yet visiting infrequently, desperate to communicate with his sibling as an adult, supplied a fresh box of 120-color Crayolas to the man-beast on an early Sunday morning.

From one incongruous eye flashed a glint of light. The creature mewled in delight. Freakish paws grabbed at the box of crayons.

Code poured from its wretched hands with feverish fluidity. The Thing That Shant Be Named growled and snarled as it bore down wax stick to wood floor. Paper tore from the crayons as it scrawled. Magenta, thistle then periwinkle. Plum, shamrock, then apricot. The air was heavy as of burnt candle.

Nick, not entirely sure what the scribblings meant, still understood on some preternatural level he must share it. But what to do? He could not risk the family's abasement, for afterall, even worse than his brother's hideous visage and inbred nature was the fact the creature lived with its mother and liked model trains. The family would be ruined.

Szabo knew the answer almost immediately. It must be shared anonymously with the world. The rest, folks, is financial history.
Grin
*applause*
You should go into writing, if you don't do it already.

Quote from: aminorex on March 08, 2014, 04:14:16 PM
Bitcoins on sale!  50% off and more! How can we do it? volume volume volume! Because we are craaaazzzzyyyy!
Doing the obnoxious american salesman bit?
Are the salesmen in space less obnoxious?
Slightly less obnoxious (still salesman after all), but if you don't watch out, they 'll make a meal out of you, and not figuratively speaking  Wink .



495. Post 5632369 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on March 10, 2014, 11:48:34 PM
Has anybody else noticed the volume on Gox has really dropped over the past couple weeks?
Yeah, bid sum is dropping too, bad sign  Wink.



496. Post 5644151 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on March 11, 2014, 05:17:54 PM


why do we hodl bitcorns ?....to fuck the next sucker over, right?


No, Same reason as why we hodl GOLD.

Because when hodling USD/EUR you are sure to get fucked over.

With GOLD you have at least something in your hands, no matter if it is really worth the price or not. Bitcoins are just bits, only virtual, nothing manifested. You cant hold it in your hands like money (yeah its only paper), gold, ice cream or whatever. I think most people, including me, have problems with this.

So would you value a turd over a bitcoin, because you can hold it in your hands?  (if so, I have some stuff I want to sell you  Cheesy )
How bout the digital movie file for the next big block buster, which hasn't been released yet.  Not tangible, but you should be able to make some money out of it, no?



497. Post 5684948 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: donut on March 13, 2014, 09:12:35 PM

In particular, I cannot understand why some bitcoiners still believe that crypto-currency in general, and bitcoin in particular, will free them from governments or banks.  If that is what you expect from bitcoin, prepare to be severely disappointed.  Governments can render cyptocurrencies useless with a single stroke of the pen; we saw that happen in China and other countries.

More generally, one cannot expect that a technological invention, by itself, will bring fundamental social, political or economic change.  The people whose wealth and power could be threatened by such change will fight it, with all the resources that their wealth and power gives them.  In particular, technology cannot give to the people of a country any freedoms that their government is denying them.


Are you honestly suggesting that black markets don't exist?

Are you really ignoring that the internet fundamentally changed society and is the reason the protests and revolutions from 2011 on are even possible despite the wishes of local dictators?

Posting about government in a way that reads "government is omnipotent" between the lines, and mentioning the French Revolution in the same post seems quite ironic indeed.



498. Post 5685943 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: shields on March 14, 2014, 12:41:06 AM
Atlas Ceo on fox business
he said 1000s of signups yesterday

this new exchange coming up is a mega bullish news, hopefully few more spring up here in the states

Wow... it's not often you see a media discussion that's dominated by Bitcoin bulls teaming up on one skeptic! Smiley

Was he drunk? He was babbling, he said "early adapters"  instead of "early adopters" about 4 times and said nonsense like "when you're storing Bitcoin you can put a value there and say it's representing gold or other things like that". Wow, that's the best rebuttal he had to the original point, which was that Bitcoin is not backed by a government or gold. Honestly he didn't sound confident talking about Bitcoin at all.
probably just nervous in front of camera



499. Post 5711025 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.26h):

Quote from: cspeter8 on March 15, 2014, 01:36:27 PM
With a new downtrend apparently established, is it perhaps time to update the poll question, from

Question: markets will overcome the resistance at 700 soon?

to something more like 

Question: markets will establish a new base below the 600 level soon?

Bit early to call an "establishment of downtrend", no?



500. Post 5725170 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on March 16, 2014, 02:42:32 AM

Its spring break. Half the normal traders are out gettin hammered, I know I am.
Ah! "Fundamentals"!  Cheesy


I recall seeing tumbleweed blowing through here when the universities open. Notable when you analyses the previous wall thread.

I think a lot of traders are students.

... or university professors ?   Wink



501. Post 5726599 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.27h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on March 16, 2014, 02:45:00 AM
Something to stare at: Off Topic



thats so tripy
Is it going up when you look at it or do you see it going down?
All parts are slowly going down, except for 1 part that is going up 4 times as fast.  Net movement is zero.

By the way, we did it , bitcoin price is finally stable  Grin.



502. Post 5834814 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

chart is looking ugly imho.



503. Post 5836044 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: MANofthePEOPLE on March 22, 2014, 08:40:37 AM
I'm usually fairly pessimistic but now there's a lot more support on the buy side than sell. Really don't think we'll break 540 anytime soon
I might be up for a bet :-) (I am fairly drunk at the moment, but still think I am capable of decent decisions  Wink )
How does 0.5 BTC sound that we"ll break $540 on Bitstamp within the week.



504. Post 5836104 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: MANofthePEOPLE on March 22, 2014, 08:48:20 AM
I'm usually fairly pessimistic but now there's a lot more support on the buy side than sell. Really don't think we'll break 540 anytime soon
I might be up for a bet :-) (I am fairly drunk at the moment, but still think I am capable of decent decisions  Wink )
How does 0.5 BTC sound that we"ll break $540 on Bitstamp within the week.

Haha nah, I've been wrong way too many times in predicting swings to take such a bet

I am willing to go to $530, but seems like you don't want to bet on it.

That's ok in my book, the gambling man inside me couldn't resist though  Wink .



505. Post 5837982 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Any longtimer here who wants to escrow a bet?



506. Post 5838228 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: chessnut on March 22, 2014, 12:20:20 PM
Any longtimer here who wants to escrow a bet?

What is the bet?


This adjusted to $530

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on March 22, 2014, 08:43:47 AM
I'm usually fairly pessimistic but now there's a lot more support on the buy side than sell. Really don't think we'll break 540 anytime soon
I might be up for a bet :-) (I am fairly drunk at the moment, but still think I am capable of decent decisions  Wink )
How does 0.5 BTC sound that we"ll break $540 on Bitstamp within the week.






507. Post 5838586 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: Pruden on March 22, 2014, 12:54:27 PM
Any longtimer here who wants to escrow a bet?

I can manage that if you want.

Let's do it then.  Smiley
ok, bet is on.

How exciting  Grin .



508. Post 5838657 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on March 22, 2014, 12:59:46 PM
When's the end date, 1 week?
yes



509. Post 5838755 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on March 22, 2014, 01:07:39 PM

Ok, bitcoin price on bitstamp over $540 before 29th March 2014, 13.00 GMT.
Eh, no bitcoin price on bitstamp below $530 before 29th March 2014, 13.00 GMT , for 0.5BTC. (with me saying it will go lower)



510. Post 5838843 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.28h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on March 22, 2014, 01:12:55 PM

Ok, bitcoin price on bitstamp over $540 before 29th March 2014, 13.00 GMT.
Eh, no bitcoin price on bitstamp below $530 before 29th March 2014, 13.00 GMT , for 0.5BTC. (with me saying it will go lower)
Quoted.
Und now we wait....   (my transaction went through as well)



511. Post 5905953 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: windjc on March 26, 2014, 05:18:13 AM
Well we didn't even get to 50% retracement of the 8 consecutive red candles (598). Which is shocking given that we went to 592 in a few hours of correction.

But the sell walls to keep price suppressed were amazingly effective. The bulls have no balls currently.

And the bears seem more eager to put up walls than to really sell.

So maybe we just sit and stare at each other for a while somewhere between $550 and $575.

Seems like a likely scenario.  Not one that I favor atm though, because it looks like I might lose my bet against Pruden  Wink .



512. Post 5931115 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Kachiiing... 

Damn, that bet wasn't good for my health...



513. Post 5936325 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: Pruden on March 27, 2014, 04:53:58 PM
Kachiiing... 

Damn, that bet wasn't good for my health...
Damn your FUD-o-matic.  Cheesy

Thanks old sport  Wink, I'll be sure to pour it back into the bitcoin ecosystem (buy stuff from merchants).



514. Post 5937111 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: +EV on March 27, 2014, 07:50:32 PM


Current bitcoin trends aside, that's a pretty awesome building/train.  



515. Post 5937344 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Just wanted to thank stan.distortion here for escrowing the bet.  
We didn't do any m-of-n stuff, so he was free to do with the funds as he wanted, but delivered as promised.  
So yes, there are some decent folk involved with bitcoin, it ain't all scams and hacks  Wink.



516. Post 5937423 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on March 27, 2014, 08:15:47 PM
Just wanted to thank stan.distortion here for escrowing the bet.  
We didn't do any m-of-n stuff, so he was free to do with the funds as he wanted, but delivered as promised.  
So yes, there are some decent folk involved with bitcoin, it ain't all scams and hacks  Wink.

whats the bet?
I said on saturday it would go below $530 within the week.



517. Post 5937741 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: seleme on March 27, 2014, 08:29:52 PM

Does that function like the bat-signal?
"Out of nowhere, our hero trader emerges and slowly but confidently draws his ruler... "


EDIT: or maybe it just shows we are on our way back to earth after visiting the moon...



518. Post 5938281 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: Dalmar on March 27, 2014, 09:01:49 PM
holly molly
even the poll is showing bearish results!
how can this not be bottom?

Are there suicidal posts on r/Bitcoin yet? The bottom is in once they show up.  Cheesy
Yeah, that's not funny at all...



519. Post 5939305 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: seleme on March 27, 2014, 10:11:21 PM
You guys are strange while taking any kind of discussion about Bitcoin with Jorge. He never owed one, he says he never will, his "whateveritiscalled" Chinese and Bitstamp predictions are crap, all in all his views are worthless.
Some things he gets right and understands very well, other stuff is just out there imo....  (of course I am a all-around boss  Wink )



520. Post 5939744 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 27, 2014, 10:36:28 PM
taxing capital gains is often taxing inflation


I never thought about that before, but you're right. They're taxing a tax.  The criminal part of my mind thinks that is the best scam ever. Now I wonder how you could tax a tax on the tax. A 1040 filing fee?

It's not really a tax on a tax, it's a way to (partially) undo your escape from a hidden tax.


Quote from: Adrian-x on March 27, 2014, 10:42:26 PM
Lol, I offered to give him 1XBT, he turned it down equating it to crack.

Nonsense, crack isn't as addictive as bitcoin  Wink .



521. Post 5940034 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.29h):

going fast now



522. Post 5945681 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Hate it when my bids and asks just barely fail to get touched.  Seriously, I was like a dollar off each time  Cry
Such a waste of good volatility.



523. Post 5983456 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: stan.distortion on March 30, 2014, 12:30:12 PM
Regarding, Jorge, the level of paranoia in here is getting a little scary (and I talk as someone who tries to maintain a high level of paranoia). Jorge is wrong (IMO) but sincere. No one is seriously going to be trying to control the market through this forum (unless it is the market for pictures of rockets and trains).

+1

(sorry, am a few pages late.)

I'm not overly impressed by Jorge's critical abilities re: Bitcoin, considering he's an established CS professor and presumably not completely unintelligent, but it's certainly pathetic to throw around baseless accusations of him being a shill just because you don't like someone's opinions.

Jorge's no shill, imho his posts have been fair, intelligent and unbiased with fairly typical blind spots for an older white male* and I'm glad he's taking part in discussions as many in this thread (including myself) tend to go off on a tangent to reality and many of his posts give a neutral to swing back to. I'm a bit mystified why he's devoting a not inconsiderable amount of time to this thread though. Sure, its a good place for banter but there's a lot of crap to wade through to find anything suitable for an academic interest in bitcoin speculation. Maybe he's getting hooked, just one little wafer thin bitcoin sir? Wink
Couldn't have said it better



524. Post 5985933 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.30h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 30, 2014, 03:45:45 PM
TERA has been suspiciously quiet.

Suspiciously? You mean he's something to do with all this?

She said she wanted to take the weekend off. I suspect those two explosions at $465 and $467 was her covering her short positions.
TERA is a woman?
Pretty big balls for an individual who isn't supposed to have any  Wink .



525. Post 6037842 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on April 02, 2014, 05:42:35 PM
Who knows what the price was before China's involvement? If you do then you know the low for now.
That makes no sense.



526. Post 6037919 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on April 02, 2014, 05:44:41 PM
Who knows what the price was before China's involvement? If you do then you know the low for now.
That makes no sense.
Why?
It seems to suggest that bitcoin is/was stable prior to China getting involved.
Also, if Chinese people are allowed to hold bitcoins, they have taken a chunk of the supply away.
In contrast, if the Chinese now all want to get rid of bitcoin, selling a large amount of bitcoins in a short timeframe would send the price below "fair price without chinese" for now.



527. Post 6037952 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: mah87 on April 02, 2014, 05:48:41 PM
Is that it? $5.49 below the last low?? Idk, second class trolls, second class FUD and second class manipulation, good thing Bitcoin isn't judged only by its opponents :/

you are one of the rare permabull existing here, even adam came to see the reality eventually...
Do pray tell, what is the reality?  Bitcoin going to zero?



528. Post 6040975 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: Chalkbot on April 02, 2014, 06:13:04 PM
I don't think permabulls are rare here. Just not a lot for us to say during Panic/Capitulation/Despondancy trade cycles. I could post reassuring messages and long term outlooks here all day, that might persuade some people to hold, but really, I'd rather get to the bottom as quick as possible. It's going to happen either way. I expect maximum pain to come before market turns around, and I really haven't felt that yet. I can't really put a $ price on what that would be, but there's no shortage of effort being applied to find out. Perhaps busting below that 400 wall on stamp would do it.

I suspect that moment is approaching, as the "news" is being recycled constantly, and FUDsters are preying on these fears, in tandem with large market dumps that no longer make sense. If you held until now, there's probably more risk in dumping than holding unless dumping for market manipulation purposes. Let the dumps commence, and let the panic spread. It's the best cure for a BTC hangover.

Hear hear


Quote from: MinermanNC on April 02, 2014, 08:30:27 PM
Of course we don't have the FED pumping up the BTC market with quantitative easing etc.
Current central bank actions are one of the reasons why bitcoin exists and generates such an interest in the first place.  The effect of quantitative easing on bitcoin prices should not be ignored.



529. Post 6041123 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 02, 2014, 08:40:39 PM
Always exit an market when fools enter, and always enter the market when fools exit. And don't ever enter the market, that everyone is talking about, or else you will be the fool. Right now there is a lot of agony from those who bought at the top of the last bubble, but there has to be total desperation with dramatic finishing speeches etc. Then you know that the market is set to buy in.

The more you attempt to explain, the less sense that you make.

+1  Cheesy

The market is awash with people who definitely have no coin but apparently are very interested in it, otherwise they would not spend their time talking about it. Hence,
- They want to buy bitcoins => Bitcoin price goes up
- They are paid trolls by some who want to disturb the scene => The puppetmasters want to buy => Bitcoin price goes up.

Never does a bear have any teeth to force the price down. The bear can only buy, which makes the price go up.
(the converse for bulls ofc)

It is quite simple to invest when you know the rule that it is the least risky to enter when there is most bearishness around. Almost nobody has any coins to sell, and every bearish post is a proof of craving to buy lower, and if this is not granted, panic buy higher.

I think this dude is getting too much shit here for making bearish posts.   Sure he is a FUDster, and he might be wrong in his predictions (I have no idea really), but what he says here isn't that crazy to justify the amount of flack, is it?
To me, that might signal that some bulls are starting to feel uneasy.
Or I might just be looking for sentiment indicators too much, and am starting to see things  Smiley




530. Post 6041437 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 02, 2014, 09:00:34 PM
And these solid lows won't exist short-term, but these lows will last weeks or months, like they always do. It seems like you guys don't even understand the basic knowledge on trend reversals, or you are playing dumb and manipulating others to buy.

Please check the chart of the last bubble before you call others "dumb".
I might have to retract my previous post already ....  Roll Eyes



531. Post 6041549 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 02, 2014, 09:11:22 PM
He says some pretty stupid shit, too....  like to say that the bulls gotta be fighting and irritated before the market is gonna go up... And, there were some other dumb things too, like he admires trolls and I am sure there is more, but there is NOT enough time in a day or life to be wasting in looking back for some more examples... ...

Surely, everyone says dumb things once in a while, but somethings cross lines... ... and maybe newer posters should be more careful to attempt to build some credibility before the get too far into the crap content posts... no?  I am just one opinion.. so really does NOT matter too much what I think.
Yes, I just became aware of that.  I haven't been lurking these forums as frequently as I used to, so I might be out of touch a bit  Smiley .



532. Post 6041702 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 02, 2014, 09:19:58 PM
And these solid lows won't exist short-term, but these lows will last weeks or months, like they always do. It seems like you guys don't even understand the basic knowledge on trend reversals, or you are playing dumb and manipulating others to buy.

Please check the chart of the last bubble before you call others "dumb".
I might have to retract my previous post already ....  Roll Eyes

What gives you the idea, that something this dynamic like the crypto market, will continue the same simple pattern of expansion year after year?
Do you really think think that the pattern of previous years is all that we need, and we shouldn't concentrate on issues like BTC loosing the trust of general public, or losing any of the business that is left in China?

Really?

What gives you the idea that you can call people dumb and manipulators, when the counter-example of your "basic knowledge" is staring you right in the face with the previous fricking bubble.  

Really?



533. Post 6041951 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 02, 2014, 09:33:24 PM
And these solid lows won't exist short-term, but these lows will last weeks or months, like they always do. It seems like you guys don't even understand the basic knowledge on trend reversals, or you are playing dumb and manipulating others to buy.

Please check the chart of the last bubble before you call others "dumb".
I might have to retract my previous post already ....  Roll Eyes

What gives you the idea, that something this dynamic like the crypto market, will continue the same simple pattern of expansion year after year?
Do you really think think that the pattern of previous years is all that we need, and we shouldn't concentrate on issues like BTC loosing the trust of general public, or losing any of the business that is left in China?

Really?

What gives you the idea that you can call people dumb and manipulators, when the counter-example of your "basic knowledge" is staring you right in the face with the previous fricking bubble.  

Really?


The start of the previous bubble was different, and the end of the previous bubble was different. Only thing that they had similar, was that they were both bitcoin bubbles. To overly simplifying things and saying that the trend will be the same as the previous trend, is dumb in my book.

I think that you guys should read up on finance, economy, entrepreneurship and the general idea trading stocks. Ignorance causes lot's of conflict here. I'm getting a little tired of it, because at first I will be called names and ridiculed, but when I in turn start to call the same people names and ridicule them, then they will start to cry that I'm cruel towards them.
You are putting words in my mouth and then arguing them.  Maybe you should get your head out of your ass and look at what people are actually saying instead of building your own fantasy world.  Either way, I am done with you.



534. Post 6043190 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Quote from: TERA on April 02, 2014, 10:56:28 PM
Can you guys stop feeling entitled to a rally every 9 months and accept for once that bitcoin is in a downtrend and stop calling everything FUD? It's getting old and doesn't help anything.
9 months ?? Blasphemy !!  
Any prediction over 3 months is for the weak, over 6 months is just plain old FUD.  Don't pretend otherwise, you shill.   Grin



535. Post 6053399 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.32h):

Anyone else getting bored of $430 ?



536. Post 6086118 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Short-term looks bullish to me.



537. Post 6087122 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 05, 2014, 06:20:06 PM
Short-term looks bullish to me.
bid

It's not bullish or bearish. It's consolidation. You're seeing the oscillations get smaller and smaller as the amplitude of the swings decrease as the bots skim the market maker spread. It's gonna flatline before or unless some new development upsets the equilibrium.  
I am just expressing my opinion.  I am interested in the opinion of others too, but please do not put on a lecturing tone.  Nobody has a crystal ball.



538. Post 6087196 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Ivanhoe on April 05, 2014, 07:02:53 PM
Ivanhoe, are u implying it's impossible for a youngster(15-20) to realize the value in bitcoin?

Or just that it is more unlikely then a 35 year old?
Not impossible, but just more unlikely  Wink

I think youngsters probably are less likely to want bitcoin for "store of value" or "safe from confiscation" etc. , but are more likely to start using it as a currency once there are enough places to use it (for example poker sites etc.).



539. Post 6087295 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 05, 2014, 07:10:58 PM
Short-term looks bullish to me.
bid

It's not bullish or bearish. It's consolidation. You're seeing the oscillations get smaller and smaller as the amplitude of the swings decrease as the bots skim the market maker spread. It's gonna flatline before or unless some new development upsets the equilibrium.  
I am just expressing my opinion.  I am interest in the opinion of others too, but please do not put on a lecturing tone.  Nobody has a crystal ball.

My fucking tone? Are you serious? I wasn't being disrespectful, but now I am. Kiss my ass.
I am serious.  I will not kiss your ass though  Smiley.  I know you weren't being disrespectful.  I just don't appreciate people telling me "what I am seeing" or how it is, I can make conclusions for myself.  I might be a bit oversensitive that way, though.



540. Post 6087376 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: Richy_T on April 05, 2014, 07:19:04 PM
Ivanhoe, are u implying it's impossible for a youngster(15-20) to realize the value in bitcoin?

Or just that it is more unlikely then a 35 year old?
Not impossible, but just more unlikely  Wink

I think youngsters probably are less likely to want bitcoin for "store of value" or "safe from confiscation" etc. , but are more likely to start using it as a currency once there are enough places to use it (for example poker sites etc.).

Possibly a good point that Bitcoin needs to jack into the youth crowd. That's more likely to be about ringtones and backgrounds than poker though.
Give 'em some credit.  First you get the smart ones who recognize the utility, then the ringtone crowd will eventually follow  Wink .



541. Post 6087472 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: jonoiv on April 05, 2014, 07:23:13 PM



In terms of the type of pendent.  Heres what it suggests. 

But,  obviously there are other factors. 


Aha, but the correct prediction was already in there without you realizing it  Grin 




542. Post 6093240 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 06, 2014, 07:21:01 AM
The Martingale "system" has no sound rational basis to even be called a system in the first place, because it does not actually do anything statistically that in any way improves outcome of any arbitrary series of fixed bets.

All the Martingale system actually does is play psychological games with your perception of wins and losses, and appeals to a misguided sense that the individual bets are somehow not statistically-independent events.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure casinos love the Martingale, since it gets you betting more and more on losing bets.

They do NOT like any system that may be employed by any gambler in which the gambler walks away with 1 satoshi more than he started with.
Martingale doesn't change the expected return of a bet.  It only results in a large probability of a small win, and a small probability of a big loss.  The average expected return stays the same.  Casino's won't mind as long as they can say stop when the betting amount gets too high.



543. Post 6093494 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 06, 2014, 08:11:02 AM
The Martingale "system" has no sound rational basis to even be called a system in the first place, because it does not actually do anything statistically that in any way improves outcome of any arbitrary series of fixed bets.

All the Martingale system actually does is play psychological games with your perception of wins and losses, and appeals to a misguided sense that the individual bets are somehow not statistically-independent events.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure casinos love the Martingale, since it gets you betting more and more on losing bets.

They do NOT like any system that may be employed by any gambler in which the gambler walks away with 1 satoshi more than he started with.
Martingale doesn't change the expected return of a bet.  It only results in a large probability of a small win, and a small probability of a big loss.  The average expected return stays the same.  Casino's won't mind as long as they can say stop when the betting amount gets too high.

The starting unit can be any unit.. you can start at $100.... and each time you win you start again at $100.. so then you are accumulating $100 for each series.. yes, you may have a 7 time losing streak that results in bets of $6,400.. but that would be rare.. you are mostly going to stay in the $100 to $1600 territory... and pocket $100 each time... and yes, if you go there starting at $100, then you will likely need to bring a pretty big bankroll in the unlikely event of a losing streak of 10 that brings you to the $51,200 bet... that way it may be better to start with a $1 or a $2 or maybe at most a $10 bet...just in case you have a prolonged negative streak.
None of that changes what I said.  It doesn't matter that losing is rare, as long as (odds of loosing * amount lost)>(odds of winning * amount won), you are on average going to lose money.
This is a situation in which you should listen to your mathematical brain, not the intuitive one, cause while the latter is very handy for handling complex situations, it takes shortcuts and is buggy.



544. Post 6113828 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: oda.krell on April 07, 2014, 04:02:29 PM
However, we are currently witnessing all the bears, even the pretty smart ones, going full retard. It kinda boggles my mind? Never seen anything like this before.

Care to give an example of what you mean?

To me at least, the delusionally bullish posts ("that's it! trend reversal choo choo!") seem pretty balanced right now with the bear FUD ("Single digits, mark my words!").

But maybe i'm biased...

I feel like the posts are pretty balanced atm too.



545. Post 6113899 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: hdbuck on April 07, 2014, 05:53:12 PM
I know this is the wrongest place ever to mention this, but I wish the price would just plummet to the point where all the people who are in this for the money would disappear. Bitcoin is about so much more than it's dollar value. We are building something more important than the internet, and it's like people are obsessing over the price of domain names.

You are being very unrealistic if you are of the belief that getting rid of speculators is helpful to BTC... In the end, the speculators are likely to make or break BTC... Speculators are likely needed in order to drive incentives to build infrastructure and to get other people interested - expanding the user base.

good point. I shouldn't hang around here, I need to become that guy that makes bitcoin practical for the unbanked masses.

unbanked masses doesnt need financial tools. they need water & food.
tsss
And how are they going to loan money to build the infrastructure needed to get that?  See microcredits.



546. Post 6144159 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 09, 2014, 05:25:08 PM
Is the 21 million BTC cap good for them?
Any miners that don't like it can mine blocks for a different chain.  Nobody will follow them - I thought we covered this yesterday.
No, you assumed that some "bad" miners would try do that in order to destroy bitcoin or whatever, and claimed that the "good" miners would not let them do that.  I am asking about your "good" miners.  is the 21 M BTC limit good for them?


My guess is they want to mine something with value ...



547. Post 6161460 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: rjp55 on April 10, 2014, 07:28:38 PM
Don't worry wall street is moving in any day now. On Jun 1, btc will IPO on nasdaq and there will just be one giant candle to $5000 regardless of whatever the chart was.

Seriously what is up your a**?

You predict downward and we go downward. This whole board is bearish. What is your problem? Where are you even reading such proclamations?
This board a week ago  Smiley .



548. Post 6162559 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.35h):

Quote from: MinermanNC on April 10, 2014, 08:52:02 PM
Wait:

Just imagine that the owner of the stolen Gox coins would jump in right now and start his big dump.
It's a scenario, if you were to take into account that the Gox coins haven't been spent yet. Such a bazooka would sent us all the way back to the double digits.
Don't talk like that  Shocked lol

Please do, that would be quite awesome.



549. Post 6175980 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Woke up this morning and realized I hardly put any bids where I though it was most likely to go ($350-360).

Sucks  Angry .

1) It might have been the "real" bottom.  (maybe not, but it's a valid candidate imho) --> I didnt buy enough
2) With the little I bought, I don't wanna risk selling part of the trading stash on this bounce.   --> I miss out on "if it goes back down, at least I'll have more coins"




550. Post 6176116 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: bitcoinsrus on April 11, 2014, 06:28:12 PM
Must confess I wish I bought and kept some coins from yesterday  Grin

I own a time machine and I will take you back to one time frame.  24 hours it is.....Although, you could have gone back to feb 11 2009  Undecided

Better yet, go back to 2008, try to get in touch with Satoshi (all the while being ready to start mining the shit out of bitcoin as soon it is released),  only to realize after some unsuccesfull attempts....  YOU are Satoshi !



551. Post 6176564 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: Guinpen on April 11, 2014, 07:09:43 PM
420 being tested again on Stamp... when will it end?!

I don't think we are in a hurry back to 340$.



552. Post 6197891 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on April 13, 2014, 12:51:37 PM
Panic....because of panic....because idiots.

we should be so grateful for idiots. they part with money so easily.

I don't trade or buy. Why should i be happy when the price goes down? How much longer will you be happy with "cheap coins"? Another 5 years?
Do you want to post here 5 years from now cheering because the price dropped to 5 dollars? Cheap coins?

Maybe sell a little portion, just enough to pay for anger management classes.
Careful, you are about to be publically ignored with a "buh-bye" .  I just don't know how your life will ever be the same  Grin .



553. Post 6215242 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 14, 2014, 03:47:03 PM
Sloppy would truly be an understatement if someone is actually paying you (highly?!) for financial analytics. It's more probable that you're plain out lying, because you can't be this thick even if you understand just the basic of finance.

If you would dig around the forums a bit, you should find that aminorex is one of the most knowledgeable posters around here. His way of stuffing tons of abstract concepts into one sentence might seem like pseudo-intellectual gibberish to some, but that's just because they don't see what the hell he means. I, too have my troubles with that sometimes Smiley

(I think he's the only poster ever whose intelligence got acknowledged by AnonyMint, that's got to count for something lol  Cheesy )


Well, then the account of this highly intelligent individual has been compromised by an moronic jackass who he can't even understand how USD is actually THE thing that gives value to BTC? Smiley

You my friend are fucking clueless...



554. Post 6215315 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 14, 2014, 03:47:57 PM
Approximate annual inflation rates since Jan/2014:

Euro Area (Euro) 1%
USA (Dollar) 1.6 %
China (Yuan) 2%
Brazil (Real) 6.5%
Argentina (Peso) 11%
Venezuela (Bolķvar) 54%
Bitcoinland (Bitcoin) 350%
 Wink


How 'bout a 2 year average?  That would give quite the different picture  Smiley .
Honestly though, it would be more fair to look at monetary inflation (in which bitcoin is still quite inflationary at present, admittedly).



555. Post 6216562 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 14, 2014, 04:55:33 PM
Honestly though, it would be more fair to look at monetary inflation (in which bitcoin is still quite inflationary at present, admittedly).
Why would that be more fair?  What matters is what 1 unit of currency can buy.  That is not determined by how many units could be printed, not even by how many exist, but by how many are in circulation, and the demand for them.
Because price inflation is more prone to "quick" (I am talking months to years here) ups and downs (due to credit and business cycles), while the monetary base is a better predictor for purchasing power on a very long timescale imo.  
Then again, my reasoning assumes that the use case of the currency doesn't really change substantially, and because bitcoin is so young, how it will be used probably has a bigger impact on price evolution than it's monetary inflation in the first years to come.  (but one can speculate about how it will be used, like Cypherdoc I think bitcoin is quite attractive as a store of value/reserve currency).

Quote from: Rampion on April 14, 2014, 05:02:50 PM
snip exchange compliancy
Thanks for the info dude, much obliged !



556. Post 6219911 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 14, 2014, 08:27:59 PM
The facts here are simple. BTC price is dependant on USD and it can be seen by merchants not willing to accept BTC without BitPay converting them right to USD.

Now, go, run boy. Buy yourself a brain and try to debate that.
How does "being able to change BTC for X" --> "BTC is dependent on X"
In your "logic" couldn't you say that the BTC price is dependent on JPY too?
Of course merchants (and especially those with low margins) will want to have the smallest exchange risk possible and for now exchange BTC for the lower volatility currencies (ie traditional fiat).
But more importantly, how do you think BTC gets its price?



557. Post 6219990 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 14, 2014, 08:04:44 PM
That's no bear mask, that's a full on troll-mask. Just completely giving up on the "researching" schtick I see.
Why a troll? I am very skeptical that Bitcoin will succeed, I already explained why I think so.
You are no troll Stolfi, just a bear.
PS: Your "bull-mask" prediction indicate a 20% chance of staying between 400$ and 500$ this year.  Given bitcoin's volatility I think that is highly unlikely. I would take you up on a bet if I didn't already know the answer was no  Smiley .

Quote from: KFR on April 14, 2014, 08:42:58 PM
People feeding the trolls again I see.   Roll Eyes
I like to think some of the trolls here are just misguided and selfrighteous bears, who might listen to reason in the end.  Sorry for probably being naive  Wink.



558. Post 6220140 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 14, 2014, 07:50:02 PM
And about bets, you know Pascal's Bet for sure.  What is the probability that handling bitcoin will get one's soul sent to Hell for eternity?  Since that is either true or false, and we have no information, we must assume it is 50%....  Cheesy

I know you are not being serious, and saying we have no information is false, but just for the hell of it:
Even if we are completely ignorant of everything except for the fact that one can handle bitcoin, I think 6.25 % is a better estimation, given that your premise consists of multiple assumptions:
I divided them into 4 [1. there is a hell; 2. one has a soul; 3. given that there is a soul and a hell, souls can go to hell for eternity; 4. given 1.2. &3., handling bitcoin will get one's soul to hell for eternity] but probably by defining the question better, more assumptions can be identified.



559. Post 6220255 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 14, 2014, 08:54:46 PM
BTC gets it's price because it is traceable to USD and to the other fiat currencies that are also dependant on USD. Go pick up a book and read on what does it mean that USD is the most dominant world reserve currency and what effect does it give to other fiat currencies.
Are my turds worth 450$ a piece too?  I am sure I can exchange them for USD too, so that's where they get their value, right?



560. Post 6220342 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on April 14, 2014, 09:11:03 PM
BTC gets it's price because it is traceable to USD and to the other fiat currencies that are also dependant on USD. Go pick up a book and read on what does it mean that USD is the most dominant world reserve currency and what effect does it give to other fiat currencies.
Are my turds worth 450$ a piece too?  I am sure I can exchange them for USD too, so that's where they get their value, right?


If someone would be foolish enough to buy your turds for 450 USD, then USD would be exactly the thing that gives your turds value. Just like with BTC.
Speechless...

Did you read those economics books, or did somebody hit you on the head with them?



561. Post 6276201 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: Mk2vr6 on April 18, 2014, 01:43:25 AM
I know, it's just so simple & effective to forget about it & hodl for years.

 ..

 ..But, I don't have years. I already spent 9 years (I'm still in 20's so it's mostly fine) losing money to a not-so-expensive-but-still 'variable-rate' learn-the-hard-way tuition fee. I need to make each slice of $$ within days, maybe weeks at most, not months nor years. And I'm not the only one. It's just difficult, not impossible. Some are making it.

 And +, there's always that half of my capital that's sitting in low-priced alts for long-term. That's a sufficient hedge against any trading loss.

People are going to speak in certainties to you here. Remember this: nothing is certain. If you dump in now, you could wind up wealthy in a few years, or you could wind up deeply in the hole never to return if this whole thing turns out to be one huge bubble in the process of popping. If you disappear for a few years and come back, you could find that you were wealthy for a while, but then bitcoin got destroyed. Then again, you could find bitcoin at $2500 and be up a nice chunk. Who knows? The point is, again, nothing is certain. Take any advice that guarantees something, such as "bitcoin to single digits," or "bitcoin to $100,000 within 2 years," with a grain of salt and a lot of skepticism.

Others will talk up their position, screaming bitcoin is dead or bitcoin to da moon based on their position.

I've got to tell you, though. You seem desperate. If you're desperately hoping for a ton of money to fall in your lap in a couple of weeks, that leaves you vulnerable to panic buying when you see it going up. You also seem kind of poor, which means if you over-invest, you will be very vulnerable to panic selling. All of this equates to a personality that is very likely to buy high and sell low. Now is not the time to be investing in bitcoin to get rich quick, that time was at $5. People investing now will need to work to make money, although there's a lot of fish in this pond relative to other markets, so if you get skilled, you can presumably make a killing. I can tell from your posts that you are very unlikely to be skilled, so be careful.

I've found the best time to buy is when everyone else is crying that the price is never going to recover, and every rise is met with cynicism and "bull trap!" The best time to sell is when every drop is met with "bear trap!" and equal amounts of cynicism in the other direction. The first means everyone is out and hoping the price will drop, the second means everyone is in and hoping the price will rise. When there's a mix, that's too risky for me. I don't like making quick trades, I just go for the big ones. I start my buying when the price is getting obliterated, and sell on the way up. The speed at which I sell depends on whether I think we're in a downtrend or uptrend. Uptrends I tend to let it go more, downtrends I try to get out quickly and be more conservative.

And don't ever short bitcoin, and never use leverage. You don't sound like you can afford to do either. There are even some people who are seemingly bears all the time who think shorting is dumb, probably from getting banged hard for doing so at some point.

Learn TA. There are people who hate on it, but I disagree. Spend your time learning how to read charts, and always take your own path. Do not buy or sell simply because someone that seems respectable tells you to. You're probably not skilled enough to be a good judge of who to trust. You can use the posts of others as confirmation of something you're already feeling strongly about, but don't take anybody's word for it without putting in the time educating yourself before you take a position.

If you want to day trade, you've got to educate yourself, and learn to control your emotions. If you don't do that before you start getting into the thick of it, you will almost certainly get destroyed if you don't luck out. Don't rely on luck, luck is for lottery players. Put in the work, and you might just be able to reap the rewards.


Killer post.

Should be made a sticky in the Newbies section.
Agreed, it's a beauty!
Might reduce bitcoin volatility by itself if stickied in newb section  Grin .



562. Post 6392252 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: TERA on April 25, 2014, 02:28:00 PM

Looks legit.



563. Post 6393403 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: Lowryder on April 25, 2014, 04:00:09 PM
7000 USD? Are you insane? Don't see a bubble here? What's the point owning "play money" worth 1M USD.
Will you oder a high voltage dildo from Thailand by using the coin or wait till it reches 10M USD?

Hellllooooo?
play money  Roll Eyes  Normalcy bias still going strong  I see...



564. Post 6393580 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: latoxine on April 25, 2014, 03:09:05 PM

Hello guys,

I'm french, ( french forum talk about everything except coins...)

-I placed an order at 448 this morning on Kraken, and I realised that it passed while I was eating at restaurant...I would have canceled it when I see how it's going down, but it's done, my first BTC !



So what would you do if you had about 950 dollars to buy BTC? Buy now ? Wait ?
1) Realize that this is your choice in the end.  If it doesn't go the way you wanted it, you only have yourself to blame.
2) How optimistic/sure are you that bitcoin will rise in the long run, and by how much?  If you think it is going to the moon, and you have the guts to sit out some bad weather, don't stay all fiat trying to catch the ultimate low.
3) You can do dollar cost averaging if you are not sure when to buy.  (Buy $100 worth at the start of every month or so).



565. Post 6404997 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: OldGeek on April 26, 2014, 07:14:55 AM
In general, I agree with you.  I've noticed (I think) some who have long holdings but don't try to influence the mood of this thread.

The complex personalities here are the most interesting to me.  I believe that there are several who practice second level thinking when it comes to making a post here.  I also think that there are some who are capable of third level thinking.
Now you intrigued me  Wink.  What do you call second level thinking?

And if you are wondering about my level  Grin:



566. Post 6407365 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on April 26, 2014, 02:20:59 PM
If you are unsure whether Bitcoin receives this "financing round" or not, just take confidence in the fact that everyone in the world can participate, there are no minimums, no maximums, no lock-in periods, and the "company" has no burn rate and its economy becomes better even while waiting for the capital injection.
Isn't there is some sort of 'burn rate' as capital get's reallocated to miners and mining companies?
I wouldn't call it a "burn rate", it's not like bitcoin is going to go bankrupt at any time.



567. Post 6423533 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.40h):

Quote from: OldGeek on April 26, 2014, 07:45:51 PM
In general, I agree with you.  I've noticed (I think) some who have long holdings but don't try to influence the mood of this thread.

The complex personalities here are the most interesting to me.  I believe that there are several who practice second level thinking when it comes to making a post here.  I also think that there are some who are capable of third level thinking.
Now you intrigued me  Wink.  What do you call second level thinking?

...

Levels of thinking:

1.   The most common and least complicated; say, you are long and want the price to go up.  You post pictures of trains and rockets and post rebuttals to those opposed to that view.  Most of the participants here fall into this category.

2.   Less common and more difficult to pull off.  Say you are short but pretend to be long.  You enter conversations with those who are long, arguing unconvincingly that the price must rise, thereby giving the impression (to level one thinkers) that the price may, indeed, be ready to decline.

3.   Uncommon and requires much more effort and practice; a combination of 1 & 2 with a large dose of logic, numbers, and charts that back up your supposed position.  So, you are long but you want to influence the level 2 people to believe you are short.  Most of the time you are trying to get the level 2’s angry enough that they will do the opposite of what they believe you want, namely talk up the price so you profit.

4.   There are, supposedly, more levels but they come with increasing complexity.  You run the risk of misjudging and damaging your intent.
  
See also:  Roshambo (Rock, Paper, Scissors) for a game simple enough to be played by pre-school children, but is played by high-rolling gamblers.

For an example, I believe, of level 2 practice, see most of the posts by Proudhon.

Do you think the ramblings on this thread have much of an impact on the price?  
I don't know honestly, I just assume the comments don't matter for convenience's sake.  Well, at least in the short term.  The fact that ideas are being discussed is a good thing, and might have an effect long-term (depending on how much "capital" is reading this thread).



568. Post 6490855 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on May 01, 2014, 12:09:35 PM
Andreas Antonopoulos on Singularity 1 on 1: "Bitcoin is not currency, it's the internet of money!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW_wYvZ1eZg

Antonoplis is great, but he overlooked a few issues on why deflation would not be a problem, namely that Bitcoin is not and likely never will be legal tender. The supply of bitcoin is finite but the supply of cryptocurrency is not. If there is not enough liquid BTC, then BTC derivatives or something like litecoin can fill the gap.

Maybe I am missing something, but why would there be 'not enough liquid BTC'?  If there is too little value available, BTC prices will rise and compensate for the lack in liquidity, no?   Why would anyone buy other stuff than the thing that keeps rising in value?



569. Post 6491106 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: mmitech on May 01, 2014, 12:47:26 PM
Andreas Antonopoulos on Singularity 1 on 1: "Bitcoin is not currency, it's the internet of money!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW_wYvZ1eZg

Antonoplis is great, but he overlooked a few issues on why deflation would not be a problem, namely that Bitcoin is not and likely never will be legal tender. The supply of bitcoin is finite but the supply of cryptocurrency is not. If there is not enough liquid BTC, then BTC derivatives or something like litecoin can fill the gap.

Maybe I am missing something, but why would there be 'not enough liquid BTC'?  If there is too little value available, BTC prices will rise and compensate for the lack in liquidity, no?   Why would anyone buy other stuff than the thing that keeps rising in value?

because they can.... human nature.
My question is : why would they?  You buy litecoin as a speculative play now.  In my mind, people want a "cheap" alternative, so there is a demand for it.  The harder bitcoin rises, the more it is perceived as "expensive" and people look for alternatives.  But what about in a more end-game environment, where bitcoin is more stable, and rises lets say 5% a year (pulling this number out of my ass), based on population growth and productivity gains.  I don't think people would perceive it as 'too expensive', because the appreciation isn't as sudden.  Where is the incentive for an alternative (genuine question)?

PS: of course you could say that litecoin or whatever altcoin have merits of their own which make them better than bitcoin, but then I would expect one of them to take over the field. I am talking about buying alternatives to the dominant crypto because it is too deflationary.



570. Post 6491384 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on May 01, 2014, 01:18:53 PM
Meh.



Cheers.
I could totally go for $280 bitcoins  Smiley.



571. Post 6492244 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: igorr on May 01, 2014, 02:19:11 PM
View Screen Capture
This picture needs a cat.



572. Post 6520562 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.42h):

Quote from: shmadz on May 03, 2014, 03:24:04 AM
I think that people should concentrate less on how to attract the masses and more about how to handle the masses when the flood gates open.
I think people are a little caught up in what is possible and perhaps ignoring what is practical.
the practical side of bitcoin is in need of much work, I'm afraid.
Hear, hear !
How bout providing more utility instead of trying to lure in more speculators.



573. Post 6579359 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.43h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 06, 2014, 06:07:18 PM


thought it was funny so i share
Grin, made me lol.



574. Post 6778433 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: niothor on May 17, 2014, 10:02:02 AM
It is interesting to observe the extremely diverse range of coexisting opinions on the price here. One group of posters will be absolutely confident that we are inevitably seeing $5000 by the summer, and the next group of posters will have lost all faith and not believe that it will even recover from this crash and hold value at all.

And you're part of which group? Wink
Luckily, there is a middle ground.



575. Post 6859028 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.45h):

Quote from: ChrisML on May 21, 2014, 06:09:33 PM
Seems we have flattened here at 490-495, kinda thought we might dip and make a nice flag. Dont really know what to think. Any thoughts on where were going from here? (besides the proverbial moon)

Just catching our breath after a big day. I'm surprised it didn't slip further.

This.

I thought we would settle down at +-$475 before going into a rally in a few days. It's hodling pretty nice up there.

Yeah, looks like it wants to go to $550 for now.



576. Post 6958276 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.47h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 26, 2014, 07:11:37 PM
Why does igorr keep on saying: This user is currently ignored. Anyone?

He is one of our most intelligent users on here. His contributions, brilliant as they are, however tend to move the markets through their sheer relevance and originality in a way that is unpredictable, maybe even dangerous.

It was decided that it would be for the better of all of us lesser users if we are spared the radiating intelligence of his posts, and thus he has been placed on ignore by most. A sacrifice none of us made lightly.

The candle that burns twice as bright...

Nice ones... Smiley



577. Post 7076477 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Jebus, that price action...



578. Post 7076696 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: molecular on June 01, 2014, 06:25:58 PM
Jebus, that price action...

well fuck me, it is quite surprising, isn't it?

I was absolutely happy with breaking 650 today... this kind of action is just insane to a level where I begin to feel a little uneasy about it.

It is.  It also never stops to surprise me how hard is to really trade unemotionally, even after I have been in a couple of bubbles (gold & silver too).  I could see the forum posts getting very bearish going into the $340, and I did buy some on the way down, but not nearly enough.  You can see people getting conditioned to declining prices, notice the sentiment, and think "haha, but this will end soon enough", and afterwards your realize your own bids were way too conservative as well.  Same at the top.  You know its overheating, you sell a bit, but not nearly enough.  I always get too greedy, both to the upside and the downside.  Suits me right for being a pig.  Thankfully bitcoin will honey-badger on no matter what :-).  As long as the fundamentals stay sound all of this is just a little side-game...






579. Post 7077256 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

This is fun to watch  Grin .



580. Post 7078045 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: molecular on June 01, 2014, 07:49:05 PM
to answer an earlier question: the USD swap market on finex has not normalized.

Best offer is 0.73 %/day.

Seems to me someone's playing/owning that market.
0.04% now  Grin

These high rates tend to get cancelled fairly quickly though. 



581. Post 7078116 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: molecular on June 01, 2014, 07:52:08 PM
to answer an earlier question: the USD swap market on finex has not normalized.

Best offer is 0.73 %/day.

Seems to me someone's playing/owning that market.
0.04% now  Grin

what the crap... now loads of offers below the previous best offer (0.73%) popped up. Flash rate offers are also back.

I think the dude just released his swaps.

Or: some bug on finex.


I doubt it's a bug.  It's just volatile trading atm (and of course whales might always try to influence the markets by jumping up and down and making some waves that are predictable for them).



582. Post 7078197 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Do we really need a nefarious explanation for all of this?  Market was pretty overbought on the short-term and corrected/ is correcting.

PS: just look at the 1h chart on bitcoinwisdom.



583. Post 7078733 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

I see what Adam is doing here.  He believes in a correlation between the number of wall observer thread posts and the BTC price, and is trying to drive both up by giving away free beer  Wink .



584. Post 7078911 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: kryptopojken on June 01, 2014, 08:41:03 PM
Enough already

Welcome to the Wall Observer Thread.   Grin



585. Post 7078978 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: Kupsi on June 01, 2014, 08:48:20 PM

Lol that is more like 2 bottles.


Alcohol is expensive here. That's the price for a 0.7l bottle of the cheapest Polish vodka.
Scandinavian?



586. Post 7095962 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: aminorex on June 02, 2014, 07:48:32 PM
 Amusingly, Goat actually started another forum site to get away from this trash.  The signal/noise ratio there is vastly better.  But it's not an external face of bitcoin, so I see value in posting here, where google is likely to take novices.
What forum is this?



587. Post 7096034 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.49h):

Quote from: bpnave on June 02, 2014, 08:18:21 PM
So Apple finally allows Bitcoin transactions for their apps in their new TOS... i smell some type of mini-rally because of this  Cheesy

Source -> https://developer.apple.com/appstore/resources/approval/guidelines.html

My highly-skilled ctrl-f research reveals no bitcoin references, and only one "payment" reference. Can you quote what it is you are referring to?
Funny, I went through the exact same sequence.



588. Post 7116788 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.50h):

Quote from: dreamspark on June 03, 2014, 06:46:55 PM
People loaning money in bull markets never stop to amaze me.
I used to think that but although its risky to have money on an exchange I know a few people who loan on Finex but aren't too into BTC, where else can you get .5% per day !
I do both.  I like diversifying my risks a bit. 



589. Post 7561501 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.55h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on June 28, 2014, 08:48:26 AM
Wall st. will be like "yeah, lets invest heavily into an easily replacable virtual commodity and let's ignore the fact that some  anonymous drug dealer or hacker can own 1mil+ coins and dump the entire market to it's knees if he choses to do so"

So what if some hacker temporarily crashes the market.  All that will cause is some temporary panic, probably a few people start to doubt bitcoin, and then it just honeybadgers on as usual.  In the end the only people who are damaged by this are leveraged longs and the hacker himself, who sold way under the fair value.

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on June 28, 2014, 09:51:19 AM
When people start to compare bitcoin to microsoft stocks and speak about the riches that their hype speculation brings to the world, then you will be reminded of this..


.. and quietly move on.
Better to always assume you are correct and never listen to opposing arguments then, right?  Because that's not retarded at all....



590. Post 7593561 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

I can haz breakout?



591. Post 7596034 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 30, 2014, 09:03:53 AM
This is the point where the train slows down and now everyone is afraid of a crash. So obviously they start selling and create a crash.
Funny how you always strut around here like a peacock proclaiming your magnificence and the stupidity of traders, yet you spend your time here predicting the price trend...



592. Post 7616562 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.56h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 01, 2014, 07:32:54 AM
Tera's reaction when she gets back and sees the price:

Don't worry. She will manage to draw some lines on a chart that shows we're actually going down.

You made my day.
I was sick of her posts for the last several months.

We all were.
No we weren't.  I think Tera is one of the quality posters on this forum.  
I really don't understand people treat him/her as a bear/troll/whatever.
Although I think he/she can be a bit too bearish or pessimistic at times, he/she is a damn good trader, has some common sense, is generally quite bullish on bitcoin and probably has more coins stored away in cold storage for the long-term than 95% of the people here.

But yeah, I guess it makes you feel better to shout "troll" at everyone who isn't uberbullish on the bitcoin price at all times for every timeframe...



593. Post 7645832 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on July 02, 2014, 08:12:37 PM
4) Let others do the hard work for you.

Wealthy people don't usually get wealthy by working for themselves. They let others do the hard work for them. And no this isn't taking advantage of people, it's called giving someone else a job.


I don't know if you're being sarcastic or serious, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you are serious. I have witnessed this kind of sincere immaturity here before.

That is exactly what wealthy people are doing - working for themselves, not for others. Running a company and offering jobs is hard work, not a privileged status to leech on others. If you run a company, then you have to have the broadest understanding of the entire company and it's business. To have any authority in the eyes of the employees, you have to know what you're doing. You have to work harder and know more then those under you, to have the respect needed for solid structural development. When companies are created by fools, who think that being an entrepreneur equals free-loading, then it's no surprise that these companies fail. These attempts to start a company, are made by those who are lazy and dumb, but they would really like to play the role of "the boss". People like that only get anywhere, when they do things like traffic drugs or win the lottery.

Well I'll be damned, I finally agree with one of your posts.



594. Post 7646756 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on July 02, 2014, 09:46:25 PM
The field was most level when our weapons were hands, feet, and teeth.  It has become steadily more uneven since then: the guys with more money generally have the best defenses and deadliest weapons, and technological advances have only amplified the difference.  
No. It might have been nearly level between young, fit men but age a bit, get sick or be a child or female and you start getting power imbalance.
This species of primate used to live in families and small groups where old and children were protected; fights were limited by instinct, etc.   There were few things to fight about, and no band would try to "own" everything or enslave other groups, because it simply did not make physical sense.  So, by and large, no group was much better off than any other.

Ain't that "just so"...  

Stories about primitive humanity are usually used to explain current behavior, and in my mind rely on a whole lot of guesstimating and extrapolation.  It's more a reflection of one's world view than anything grounded in reality as far as I am concerned.

Even worse are claims about "how things happen in nature", where anybody with real knowledge can almost always provide countexamples.



595. Post 7651499 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: justusranvier on July 03, 2014, 05:38:38 AM
To the veterans here, does this pre-bubble FEEL different than the previous pre-bubbles (under the assumption that a bubble is nigh)?

The difference is the 6 months of bear shit and goxxing and fud we've just had. This wasn't the case last time.
It was just good news and good news meant up.
In those 6 months people have been trained to dump on every news. It's hard to go up when people dumb in blind panic because of a press conference. Also lots of people who bought in at 700-1000 months ago and they want their money back. This is obviously something we didn't have before.

It does feel the same. There is just so much more stopping us from going up. And it sucks.
The people trying to make their money back i totally understand but those panic sellers...man.
Feels a bit like 2011 (post mania) - early 2013.

Two years of an almost uninterrupted stream of good news, with little price movement.

I am fine with another plateau phase, followed by a big-ass bubble  Wink



596. Post 7678845 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: KFR on July 04, 2014, 07:24:44 PM
Nope, don't even try debating with Oda directly on bitcoin's long term potential.  Not worth the breath.  I'll stop short of calling Oda an outright troll, but shortsighted permabear is adaquate enough of a label.

You string words together, but there is no thought at all behind them, huh?

You have very clearly no idea of what my ideas are about the long term prospect of Bitcoin. But in a way I'm happy you posted - you're an excellent example of what I described in my post right above: you're one of those in here for whom any perceived opposition to the only possible outcome of the million dollar coin must be met with the utmost contempt ("permabear", "troll", "shortsighted").

Never let facts or reasoning get in the way of a good dream.

So you treat their contempt with... contempt?  WinkTongue

If only ultrabullish posts are never questioned here, and everything else is assaulted, this will become a very shallow and boring thread indeed, inhabited only by echo-chambering ultrabulls, and complete troll-bears who like to incite the ultrabulls.



597. Post 7686431 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: chriswilmer on July 05, 2014, 09:18:19 AM
bfxdata.com shows USD swaps just jumped by 1.5 million to 30.5 million
best swap offer now 0.4475 %/day

Beginner question: does this mean that it's now expensive to go long?


Yes. And it means that a lot of traders on Finex are either a crazy gamblers or super bullish on BTC. Or more likely both.

BTC swap rate demand is at 0.0016% (for going short on BTC)

USD swap rate demand is at 0.175% (for going long on BTC)

That's a hundred fold difference in interest rates. Incredible. Has it always been like this?


Is it really that incredible though? I mean... think about what it means to borrow bitcoins and pay back with interest. It's a very different commitment than borrowing US dollars!

Imho it has to do with the fact that there are few places to get your bitcoins to earn interest for you, while there are many places in the conventional financial system in which your fiat can get a return (bonds of all kinds, savings deposit).  Furthermore, BFX is only known to the bitcoin world, and bitcoin people prefer to keep their money in BTC, as they believe the gains there through appreciation will be greater.
Also, shorting bitcoin (over the long-term) has been a losing strategy so far.



598. Post 7686510 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: iram3130 on July 05, 2014, 10:51:52 AM
holy LTC pumps :O
Okcoin going nuts

This thread for Bitcoin not LTC, why you posted this here.

Let's face it, this thread is a hangout lounge / bar for general discussions, with a heavy focus on bitcoin trading.

By the way, does anybody know a place where I could short shitcoins like DOGE and other smaller alts ?



599. Post 7686556 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: JustBetweenUs on July 05, 2014, 11:00:30 AM
holy LTC pumps :O
Okcoin going nuts

This thread for Bitcoin not LTC, why you posted this here.

Let's face it, this thread is a hangout lounge / bar for general discussions, with a heavy focus on bitcoin trading.

By the way, does anybody know a place where I could short shitcoins like DOGE and other smaller alts ?

I'm interested in shorting LTC and DOGE too. Let me know if you find something.

LTC is easy: Bitfinex.  I initially set up a short in january, but I closed it down because I was scared of big spikes due to low liquidity that would cause me to liquidate.  Should have kept it  Embarrassed.  Made a nice 10% a few days ago though.



600. Post 7686659 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: iram3130 on July 05, 2014, 11:05:23 AM
holy LTC pumps :O
Okcoin going nuts

This thread for Bitcoin not LTC, why you posted this here.

Let's face it, this thread is a hangout lounge / bar for general discussions, with a heavy focus on bitcoin trading.

By the way, does anybody know a place where I could short shitcoins like DOGE and other smaller alts ?

I still think we focus here only for Bitcoin Speculation/trading/discussion, not other altcoins because then this thread will become all shitcoin news thread.

Ok, maybe you are right.  I'll stop it too.



601. Post 7723919 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.57h):

Quote from: Raystonn on July 07, 2014, 08:14:13 PM
You're missing the main point anyway - the utility of illegal drugs are not affected by their legal status. The utility of BTC is greatly reduced if it is made illegal. And what's the "intrinsic" value of BTC in the first place? Its utility.

No.  Bitcoin's utility as a store of value would not be affected.  Only its use as a currency would be affected.  The use as a store of value is what most directly translates into its exchange price today.

I think it would.  I am less likely to keep my purchasing power in a store of value that is very tricky to spend when I want to make a purchase.



602. Post 7789632 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.58h):

Quote from: klee on July 11, 2014, 01:56:09 PM
I give a 43% bounty for finding who stole my BTC and returning them (for 1170btc total that would be 500BTC)
https://blockchain.info/nl/address/1GwNLwoCQiobJzmURSAq54vH4BYjFkwaxr

Wow, that's seriously shitty.  Best of luck to you.

Any idea how it happened by the way?



603. Post 7846593 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.58h):

Quote from: spooderman on July 14, 2014, 09:38:30 PM
I had a chat with an old relative of mine today. Bitcoin entered the conversation. He said, oh that, that's a ponzi scheme. I said no it's not. He then explained to me what a ponzi scheme is and I said yes I know it LOOKS like one because of the massive amount made by people involved from the beginning, but is the internet a ponzi scheme? No? Well what if you bought sex.com in 1992 for a hundred bucks?

Then he said you can't buy plane tickets with it, so I said yes you can www.expedia.com then we stopped talking about it and it was time to get some food, and he said you can't buy food with bitcoin, and I said yes you can! (I was talking about buying pizza funnily enough), then he said you can't buy a flat with it etc......

It's nice that bitcoin has developed to the stage where there's constant examples of its acceptance, functionality and superiority to fiat.

To d4 m00n!

Tell him to look up the definition of a Ponzi scheme again.  At worst you could call bitcoin a pump and dump.



604. Post 8269063 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.03h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 09, 2014, 05:44:01 PM
That is one reason why I am skeptical of bitcoin: I have yet to see a "business plan", a consistent and fairly complete description of a future "bitcoin economy", with explicit numbers for volume of commercial use, fees, confirmation delays, deflation rate, wealth distribution, hoarding, banking, legal status, taxes, mining costs, etc.
Might as well ask for a unicorn while you are at it  Wink .


Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 09, 2014, 05:44:01 PM
Like, why would people use BTC for payments, if it is not inflationary -- why would they not hoard every BTC they get, and use some Garbagecoin or national currencies for payments?  But if they were to do that, why would bitcoin have any value at all?
The simplistic arguments of trillions divided by 21 million seem to fall apart once one tries to fill in the details...
Why would you hold Garbagecoin or fiat when it depreciates while you hold it.  Why not immediately exchange your Garbagecoin for BTC that holds its value (or appreciates), and then spend it when you want to spend money? 



605. Post 8277872 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.03h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 09, 2014, 09:27:35 PM
Why would you hold Garbagecoin or fiat when it depreciates while you hold it.  Why not immediately exchange your Garbagecoin for BTC that holds its value (or appreciates), and then spend it when you want to spend money? 
People still use dollar bills all the time for their convenience, not bothered by the fact that dollar bills lose 1% (or whatever) per year of purchase power.   People who want to store value do not save dollar bills, they buy stocks, Treasury bonds, real estate, etc..  Why would it not be the same with Bitcoin vs. Garbagecoin?

Only problem is that stocks pay dividends, bonds pay uinterest, but bitcoin is worth anything only if people will want to buy it for use as currency...

That is what a "business plan"  would have to do: describe an economic scenario for bitcoin such that individuals (including ordinary consumers as well as miners, entrepreneurs, big investors, etc.), acting on their self-interest, would tend to maintain that scenario, or at least would not destroy it right away.
The point is that with bitcoin (in the endgame, when it is more stable and super user-friendly) they won't have to buy stocks, bonds etc. to get the same benefits that fiat delivers today.  
Real estate is only for rich people.  Bonds and stocks somewhat less so.  However there are fees associated with moving in and out of bonds, stocks etc. .   If you want to buy and sell bitcoin on an exchange now, there are also fees associated with it, but when more people use it for buying their pizza, paying out salaries etc., this won't be the case.  
Moreover, bitcoin would be more liquid, divisible and fungible than stocks, and therefore more desirable in a transaction.



606. Post 8303462 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.03h):

Quote from: justusranvier on August 11, 2014, 09:41:25 PM
Speaking of Satoshi Nakamoto, I have a "historical" question.  When he set up the first mining node and started the current blockchain, did he see it as "the" blockchain, that one day would be used to buy servers from Dell, support investment funds, send people to jail, etc.; or did he think of it as an alpha-test of the protocol, that would be used only by computer nerds, only long enough to show that the idea was sound?

(IIRC there is nothing about that in the published paper.  Did he comment on that in his "epistles"?)


Yes.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1r8iwt/satoshi_and_hal_finney_discuss_the_value_of/

Hall is wrong about the economical aspect though.  Bitcoin wouldn't take the value of all the wealth in the world.  It would take over the value of the things it replaces (and perhaps some more for the value it creates), meaning the value of fiat (as currency and a savings vehicle), and to a certain degree of gold, bonds etc. (as savings vehicles) + who knows what.
Money is a commodity in its own right, and is valued as such.  It's not because the value of a house would be measured in BTC that bitcoin takes over the value of that house.



607. Post 8368098 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on August 15, 2014, 05:03:49 PM
The truth is, at every large sell, you'll be hearing manipulation screams here. So what are "legitimate" sells? Bitfinex pigs getting slaughtered to the tune of 8 million USD within 2 days so far is manipulation I guess?

That's enough of me pissing against the wind, oda. Tongue

True , crying manipulation whenever the price isn't going the way you want it to is just plain stupid.

In other news, darkcoin and doge being taken to the slaughterhouse.



608. Post 8368123 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: Riddikulo on August 15, 2014, 05:04:35 PM
The bitcoin it`s going down cause the Ethereum team it`s dumping all the BTC! They dumped 1,150 bitcoins 5 days ago when the price was $590, 1,350 3 days ago when the price was $550, and now they have dumped 1,237 more TODAY when the price was $510, that`s why we went down 500usd and we are going to $450... Fucking Ethereum, stop killing the bitcoin.

https://blockchain.info/es/address/36PrZ1KHYMpqSyAQXSG8VwbUiq2EogxLo2?filter=1

Thank them for the opportunity to buy cheap coins.



609. Post 8368142 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.05h):

Quote from: njcarlos on August 15, 2014, 05:07:53 PM
In other news, darkcoin and doge being taken to the slaughterhouse.
As they should.
No arguing from me there.



610. Post 8418029 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.06h):

I think we might have seen the worst. Too bad because I had orders around $430 that didn't get filled.



611. Post 8418213 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.06h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on August 18, 2014, 02:58:39 PM
wow... you have spent too much time on this thread Jorge...  you are sounding more and more like a troll lunatic/Bitcointalk.org member/one of us than an academic that anyone would take seriously, shame for you.  

The language may be a failed attempt to be funny but the opinion is quite serious.  What we saw since May/20 was a sudden rise from ~440$ to ~640 that no one can (or wants to) explain, then seven weeks of wandering around 600$, then a sudden drop back to ~470, that no one can (or wants to) explain either.   Why is it absurd to consider all that as a single event?

I have proposed a partial explanation: starting May/20, a few people got wind of something that made them buy all they could.  Now those people changed their minds, and dumped everything back.  So the price got back to where it was.  Is its so much sillier than the narwhals(*) that people have been discussing here?

(*) a large sea mammal reputed to be a cross between a whale and a unicorn.


A possible explanation: a lot of not so steady hands thought "bottom was in, now lets go in for TO DA MOON $10k by end of the year".
Then it turned out that bitcoin doesn't magically give instant riches as quickly as they wanted it to (not enough new buyers yet at higher prices), and then they got fearful when it started going down again.



612. Post 8418220 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.06h):

Quote from: mmitech on August 18, 2014, 03:00:18 PM
I think we might have seen the worst. Too bad because I had orders around $430 that didn't get filled.

ah don't worry, I think they will be filled and you will be sorry for not putting them lower.
Could very well be.  I have lower bids as well , so keep it coming  Grin.



613. Post 8418471 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.06h):

Quote from: T.Stuart on August 18, 2014, 03:17:30 PM

Is this so much sillier than the narwhals(*) that people have been discussing here?

(*) a large sea mammal reputed to be a cross between a whale and a unicorn.


Oh come on Jorge. These are regular whales we're talking about. Everyone knows narwhals don't exist.  Smiley
Huh
You know they do, right?  (I am confused). 



614. Post 8419120 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.06h):

Quote from: X7 on August 18, 2014, 03:57:16 PM
Question is, how will you feel if the price rebounds to 500 soon? Or even 550.

If it hits 550, and stays at that minimum for 2 weeks or more, then it's likely a reversal.  I'll happily buy more then.

Until then, it's still a bear downturn.  Acting like it's all over now is just silly.
I'm talking short term here. Not saying this bear downturn is down, just that things can bounce for now, and have already begun bouncing a while ago.

Why in the hell am I, accused "bear troll", arguing with former permabulls about the price rising? Cheesy Cheesy Funny how that goes, isn't it? The former bullish people giving up hope.

Thing is, if I'm wrong, I just CUT LOOSE.

All in the pursuit of a quick profit - we keep making BTC look like a volatile joke to the uneducated :/

Good traders reduce volatility



615. Post 8452080 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: justusranvier on August 20, 2014, 11:37:40 AM
If you're going to accurately compare Bitcoin and Litecoin, then look at the LTC/BTC exchange rate instead of comparing them both to USD, which is irrelevant to the comparison.

How is this so?
If you want to know if Litecoin was a better investment compared to Bitcoin, then look at that exchange rate.

Watching both of them move against the USD, and then trying to deduce from the two graphs which one moved faster is a process more prone to error compared to just looking at the relevant exchange rate.

The reason no Litecoiners don't display this chart is because it's not nearly as compelling:

http://cryptocoincharts.info/v2/pair/ltc/btc/btc-e/alltime

Litecoin started trading at 0.006 BTC and now, almost two years later, it's trading at... 0.008 BTC.

If you think about it, litecoin and pumpcoins in general help to smoothen out the BTC price curve, providing some extra price stability.  Long live litecoin !



616. Post 8679018 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.10h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on September 05, 2014, 12:06:16 AM

nice one!



617. Post 8926944 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Quote from: findftp on September 22, 2014, 03:29:32 PM
Can somebody quote me on calling the bottom?
I would like to say "told you" in the future.

Today I had a new insight which confirms my previous prediction about the next bubble start (which you can read at the left)
quoted



618. Post 8927515 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Quote from: meanig on September 22, 2014, 03:47:40 PM
Can somebody quote me on calling the bottom?
I would like to say "told you" in the future.

Today I had a new insight which confirms my previous prediction
about the next bubble start (which you can read at the left)



Do tell?

I will, afterwards. I don't want to look like a moron if I'm wrong Smiley Smiley Smiley

Only morons are allowed to post in this thread  Wink

It's spelled moran, you moran.  Wink




619. Post 8943146 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.15h):

Quote from: AirFlame on September 23, 2014, 06:36:00 PM
Bitfinex charts stuck Huh $427 Bitstamp Bitfinex $440 ?
trading engine is barely responding.



620. Post 9066229 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.18h):

Let the games begin  Grin

Too bad my internet connection is "Le Suck" atm.



621. Post 9066791 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.18h):

Quote from: nanobrain on October 03, 2014, 02:08:33 PM
And before anyone wonders, this of course is me Smiley

I would  Cheesy Cheesy


Whenever I see an Empowering post I see this face



Lol, could you do me next?  (unless I post too unfrequently to be a genuine Wall Observer character).



622. Post 9066820 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.18h):

Quote from: Torque on October 03, 2014, 02:13:05 PM
And before anyone wonders, this of course is me Smiley

I would  Cheesy Cheesy


Whenever I see an Empowering post I see this face

Total off-topic comment, but I think William Dafoe would have played a better Joker than Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight.  But that's just like, my opinion...
Dafoe has the face, but I doubt he could portray a Joker as realistic and interesting as that of Ledger, with all the little mannerisms.



623. Post 9072448 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.18h):

Quote from: inca on October 03, 2014, 10:22:48 PM
Wasn't Gabi supposed to take us to the moon? What usernames were repeating that every day? Why do i never see anyone here saying they were completely wrong and delusional?

Do you ever stop whining? You seem very emotional about this price drop.

He is the only reason why I still have hopes for  a "perpetuum mobile" machine.  

If only there was energy to be harvested everytime another variation of 'You idiots - me so smart' was uttered.

Quote from: Oblodo on October 03, 2014, 10:28:27 PM
Why are there so many conspirationist in here? Whales and Illuminati my ass. Just a bunch of amateurs with greed in their minds and herd behavior. Chill, this is a looong project, not something to be retarded over. It will be fine, and it will be dandy!

Agreed.



624. Post 9072476 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.18h):

Quote from: Oblodo on October 03, 2014, 10:32:45 PM
Jesus never existed, he is and has not ever been. Not a single piece of evidence exist, just retarded, ignorant people, living in fear of reality think there is a god or super-being out there. You are just lustful, and greedy like all of us primates..  

Can we please leave religion out of here.  There is enough polarization on these boards already  Smiley.



625. Post 9076599 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.19h):

Quote from: jeezy on October 04, 2014, 08:46:31 AM
Is it just me or are people getting sick of the falling and starting to short bitcoin? Because I have this urge to short but I feel like I'm being manipulated...

Is my tinfoil on too tight?  Huh

Nope. Shorts getting squeezed.

Doesn't the price go UP during a short squeeze?



626. Post 9089556 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.19h):

Quote from: macsga on October 05, 2014, 11:34:05 AM
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/400-european-banks-accept-bitcoin-purchase-agreement/

I don't really get this news, but it reads to me like it's just an online exchange, that accepts fiat deposits from multiple banks through Sofort.  Not a big deal at all imho.

In other news, thanks for the cheap bitcoins  Wink.



627. Post 9095628 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.20h):

Looks like Final Capistupation Day to me.



628. Post 9128673 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on October 08, 2014, 01:29:20 PM
Seems weird that international sepa proceeds instantly
Fiat rocks
Maybe we don't need Bitcoin after all.  Grin

Nonsense.  Long before Bitcoin was a thing, I dreamed of money with wildly fluctuating buying power.
I imagined a world where it took an hour to buy a cup of coffee, an hour to gas up your car, an hour to buy a bag of groceries...  Because math.

Obviously you've never done any actual shopping with bitcoin.



629. Post 9128722 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

Quote from: thompete on October 08, 2014, 01:35:50 PM
Volatility is a problem because btc is in its infancy. With increasing adoption the swings will be smaller and smaller

Why will with increase in adoption swings be less? Wouldn't it be more as more people will buy so demand increases?
Throw a bucket of water into your bath --> bath water moves a lot. Throw a bucket of water in the ocean --> ocean doesn't move a lot.



630. Post 9128741 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on October 08, 2014, 01:38:00 PM
Nonsense.  Long before Bitcoin was a thing, I dreamed of money with wildly fluctuating buying power.
I imagined a world where it took an hour to buy a cup of coffee, an hour to gas up your car, an hour to buy a bag of groceries...  Because math.

Obviously you've never done any actual shopping with bitcoin.

I have never bought a cup of coffee with Bitcoin.
I have never gassed up my car with Bitcoin.
I have never bought a bag of groceries with Bitcoin.
It was just a dream...
If you have and it took an hour, then those places seriously need to rethink how they accept their bitcoins.
My payments go through instantly (zero confirmations required).



631. Post 9129814 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.21h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 08, 2014, 03:11:14 PM
we're either going to fall back to previous resistance and have it become support 330 or we pop over 350 pretty soon. we'll see

there always secret option  number #3 which i can't reveal at this time  Cool

My guess: hover around $335-350 for a little while, then blastoff to $375.



632. Post 9196315 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: Pala_00 on October 14, 2014, 11:02:50 AM


What if there is more to crypto than just pumping?   Huh  Roll Eyes



633. Post 9200828 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: okthen on October 14, 2014, 06:23:55 PM
...
global economic recession is near, and even a noob trader can sense it.  btw i have quit my position in stock exchange and wait for more good news from bitcoin.

Take us home, Satoshi!



Why the hell are they happy?Huh
Because they, supposedly like us, have delusional ideas that make them happy even when the reality is ugly. 
Meanwhile, in the real reality, lambchoppy is getting nervous about his shorts , but won't admit it Wink .



634. Post 9200873 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: hdbuck on October 14, 2014, 06:27:46 PM
Take us home, Satoshi!

Why the hell are they happy?Huh
Because they, supposedly like us, have delusional ideas that make them happy even when the reality is ugly.  
Meanwhile, in the real reality, lambchoppy is getting nervous about his shorts , but won't admit it Wink .

Meaniwhile, in the reality, lambchoppy is just like you. Just like you are like everyone in here. Because you are all like me: Bitcoin addicts.
What, you mean it isn't normal behaviour that I check bitcoinwisdom everytime I go take a shit ?  Grin



635. Post 9201431 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on October 14, 2014, 07:17:36 PM
When was the last time you carried a wheelbarrow full of fiat, Richy_T?  
Me, personally? Not yet..

Then WTF are you talking about?  Sure, fiat has failed in the past.  So did entire civilizations.  Life is funny that way.

I am sure some of the level-headed citizens of those civilizations saw the writing on the wall and emigrated.



636. Post 9201782 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on October 14, 2014, 07:39:51 PM
Let me explain how that works:
Kupsi opined that he favored Bitcoin because, unlike government-controlled fiat, bitcoin is governed by maths and science.
I pointed out that my shitcoin was also unbacked by statist pigs, and, like Bitcoin, was ruled by science Smiley
What don't you get here? (be specific)

I agree that "Maths and Science" sometimes get thrown around like magical solutions by some pro-bitcoin people.

But ask yourself this:
How easy is it to change the money emission scheme for a central bank?  
How easy is it to change the money emission scheme for the bitcoin network?


To come up with some other buzzwords: it's the combination of decentralisation, personal incentives and the enabling technology that makes bitcoin tick.





637. Post 9201937 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on October 14, 2014, 07:50:50 PM
Let me explain how that works:
Kupsi opined that he favored Bitcoin because, unlike government-controlled fiat, bitcoin is governed by maths and science.
I pointed out that my shitcoin was also unbacked by statist pigs, and, like Bitcoin, was ruled by science Smiley
What don't you get here? (be specific)

I agree that "Maths and Science" sometimes get thrown around like magical solutions by some pro-bitcoin people.

But ask yourself this:
How easy is it to change the money emission scheme for a central bank?  
How easy is it to change the money emission scheme for the bitcoin network?

It is relatively easy to change the rate of money creation for a central bank. That's essential to modern economy.
It is very difficult to change the rate of money creation for both Bitcoin and my shitcoin. 
If this difficulty is what you like about Bitcoin, you should love my shitcoin too.<==that's my point.

Ok, but then we get into the network effect argument.



638. Post 9201976 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on October 14, 2014, 08:02:04 PM
It is relatively easy to change the rate of money creation for a central bank. That's essential to modern economy.
It is very difficult to change the rate of money creation for both Bitcoin and my shitcoin.  
If this difficulty is what you like about Bitcoin, you should love my shitcoin too.<==that's my point.
Ok, but then we get into the network effect argument.
That's a different argument.  I simply pointed out that Bitcoin's inelasticity is, in itself, an insufficient reason for Bitcoin to succeed.
True



639. Post 9203283 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.24h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on October 14, 2014, 09:31:33 PM
I agree that "Maths and Science" sometimes get thrown around like magical solutions by some pro-bitcoin people.

But ask yourself this:
How easy is it to change the money emission scheme for a central bank?  
How easy is it to change the money emission scheme for the bitcoin network?

To come up with some other buzzwords: it's the combination of decentralisation, personal incentives and the enabling technology that makes bitcoin tick.

Which why it is going to be very interesting watching the emerging govcoins (Ecuador, Philippines). Because, if their coins languish in the alts, or are attacked and burned, then it will be obvious to everyone that riding the Bitcoin train is the only way to go.

all they are really doing, is glorified online banking. an entry in their database is only worth something because the good poeple of Ecuador were told it was worth something.

 no government is going to have the BALLS it takes to limit their money supply.

but no matter we are doing it for them  Cool
Yeah, this.  If anything, I think the emergence of (small) govcoins might be a positive, since people might get used to using something crypto-like, and shops get the infrastructure and know-how on how to handle these things.  Then after a while, people will wonder why they can't just use bitcoin, which will be accepted globally, and will probably retain its value or increase in value much better  (don't know if the specifics on these govcoins are out yet, but I suppose they'll peg them to their national currency).



640. Post 9247309 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.25h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 18, 2014, 05:32:48 PM
The Brazilian Real is stronger than the Argentinian Peso, but both have fared much better than bitcoin in 2014.  People who try to sell bitcoin as a way to protect one's investment from inflation should be jailed, IMHO.

Surely everybody who has a different economic opinion than yours deserves to rot in jail.....

Seems like you really can't fathom that people believe in this stuff without either being conmen or their foolish targets.

Please do tell me what you think makes a good investment from inflation.  Housing, bonds, gold (I doubt you'll like gold), the Real ... ??
Anything can go down in purchasing power in the future, though the odds for that are different.

I'll agree that bitcoin is highly risky, and very volatile, but it has all the characteristics to potentially be the best store of value ever seen.  
I find it weird that lots of people seem so hung up on the volatility aspect of a 'store of value'.  Perhaps the term means different things for different people because the desired timeframe is different.  Me, I would rather have something that bounces up and down in value 50% in a year but stays stable or increases in price on a multi-year scale versus for example the dollar which is less volatile but is almost sure to lose value in the longterm.



641. Post 9247810 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.25h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 18, 2014, 06:39:41 PM
People who try to sell bitcoin as a way to protect one's investment from inflation should be jailed, IMHO.
Surely everybody who has a different economic opinion than yours deserves to rot in jail.....

No, just those who try to swindle others by selling them shares of dry oil wells, water-powered cars, ponzi schemes, etc..

And people who recommend bitcoin fall into that category?


Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 18, 2014, 05:32:48 PM
Real estate, and stocks of large, established and diversified companies are usually a safe investment.  Even if they are overpriced at some point, and may crash eventually, there is a limit to how much they can go down before hitting their fair price.  Since they are material property, their real value will not be affected by inflation.  For those who are too lazy or small to use those investments, there are many bonds and investment funds that are somewhat riskier and offer smaller returns, but will still protect from inflation.
There is no limit to how low established companies can go in price (unless you count 0 as the hard limit  Smiley )
Stocks are not material property.
Real estate will indeed never be worthless, but in certain political environments it might be confiscated, so it's not a zero risk investment either, you could lose all.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on October 18, 2014, 05:32:48 PM
No one can honestly predict the future of bitcoin.  It may rise again to thousands of dollars, or it may be superseded by something else and go down to zero.   It is a big gamble, a lottery ticket with unknown odds.  People should be free to gamble, but must know that it is gambling and not investment.
Investment implies risk.  



642. Post 9282987 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.25h):

Quote from: Tzupy on October 21, 2014, 09:26:20 PM

Thanks!  

But, of course, now big traders will immediately implement their algorithm, and that will make it ineffective.  Smiley

Thanks Walsoraj, I'll look into it, although it's not an easy read.

I doubt that it will become ineffective if large traders implement it, I believe it should speed up the market by increasing volume.
I think it would become ineffective.  If you know your 'opponents' strategy in advance, you can always frontrun them.



643. Post 9347421 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.27h):

Quote from: mmitech on October 27, 2014, 04:24:53 PM
I dont understand, I can see longs with the buys appearing but I don't see any huge sells with the kind of these shorts (+20K BTC), I just don't get it.
Somebody is playing games.  Guess we'll find out what game it is after it has been played....



644. Post 9455734 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: raid_n on November 06, 2014, 09:12:15 AM
Bitcoin was meant to be an e-payment method (decentralized, trutless, etc.).  A fixed bitcoin supply is not necessary for that goal.  Indeed, bitcoin is being used in that role, in spite of still having 10%/year inflation (and even higher in the past).  And dollars and euros work fine as payment methods, in spite of their "horrendous" 1-2%/year inflation rate.

Thus, the argument that "raising the emission limit would destroy the value of bitcoin" does not sound convincing.  Hoarders would be very unhappy, of course.  Miners, however, may someday find it advantageous, especially by the time they are expected do depend on transaction fees instead of block rewards.  Block reward is steady and predictable, whereas fees depend on transaction volume -- which will probably shrink substantially if fees became mandatory.   People who use bitcoin for payments may not care, or may prefer block rewards because they provides "free" transactions.

It has been argued that, if some miners tried to change the protocol, the rest of the network would stick to the old one.  However, this correction mechanism has never been tested, and it seems difficult to predict what would happen, in all possible scenarios.  (After all, it was "proved", with the same certainty, that altcoins would die as soon as they were born.)  What if those "some miners" had 70% of the hash rate?  What if a large subset of the users became convinced that the change was necessary for the health of the network, or got some immediate benefit from it (such as no-fee transactions)? What if payment processors and merchants accepted only the "new" bitcoin?  

(By the way, some bitcoiners seem to be trying to convince people to adopt bitcoin by telling them that money sucks.  I sense a problem with that marketing strategy: it seems that many people have used money sometime in their lives, and may even have enjoyed the experience -- unlikely as that may sound.  Wink)

I have to side with Jorge here. It is unlikely that coin emission will change in recent times but it is not impossible.
Ultimately you cannot enforce what rules people subscribe to. The mere existence of altcoins proves that multiple rule sets can concurrently exist.
And no one should fool themselves that only one coin will ever be accepted by retailers. If it is trivial to integrate bitcoin, it is trivial to integrate other coins.

The proposition that only bitcoin can and will survive comes from selfish motives. You only need to believe in that if you want its value to be extremely high.
There is enough room for multiple cryptocurrencies and they can and will come and go as technology changes.

Does it really matter if I pay something in btc, ltc, doge, nxt or ether? If the design and security of the protocol is sound (which I am not advocating here for many of the so called bitcoin 2.0 alts, the verdict is still open) and enough people use and accept it it is "good enough".

Arguments on the network effect only work to a certain degree. An analogy would be to claim that something like Facebook or Google will be the sole existing service simply because it has the biggest network.

You can both feel free to invest in Freicoin, I'll stick with bitcoin as is thank you very much.



645. Post 9455823 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: MrPiggles on November 06, 2014, 05:46:31 AM
If you started 350 days ago I really can't be arsed to calculate it, but either way you're clearly full of shit even if you only started with 0.01 btc or a few satoshis.
Which obviously means he has 0BTC.  Pretty easy to double 0BTC everyday now ain't it.  Kiss
Yeah, but is it possible to sell 0 btc to buy 0 xrp?
Pretty sure that just makes him full of shit, if he's claiming to have something and double it daily but really has zero, it's not clever semantics, it's bullshit.

Well I thought it was funny....


Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 06, 2014, 11:47:25 AM
I assume that 95-99% of this forum would not have heard of bitcoin if the emission would have been infinite from the beginning. satoshis incentive design for bitcoin is from an economics perspective the schumpeterian wet dream for raising awareness for an invention.
For all I know, computer types were first attracted to bitcoin for the pleasure of helping to test a smart solution to an old technical problem.  Then libertarians got interested because they saw in bitcoin a way to build an economy independent of  government and banks.  Then drug users and sellers adopted it as a way to pay for drugs without the DEA knowledge (so they thought).  At some point, others noticed the value going up like crazy, and bought into it as a get-filthy-rich-quick scheme.

I suspect that a majority of the people in this forum are from the latter group.  The finite supply of bitcoins is important only for that group, because it is part of the argument that "proves" that the price will be astronomical one day.  But it is not essential, even to them; that argument would have been only a little less convincing if the supply was programmed to increase 5%/year, forever.  So much so, that they are not bothered by the current 5-10% inflation rate.
If you see the quote about bank bailouts in the genesis block, then clearly satoshi has political/ economical motives.  I strongly disagree about the finite supply being only important for the late speculators as well.



646. Post 9455954 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.29h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 06, 2014, 10:46:15 AM
Hoarding currency is a very stupid way of saving. 
Saving is a tax on workers: you work now, but instead of buying a car right away with your salary, you buy it only months or years later; in the meantime someone else uses that car.  That may benefit capitalists, but what drives capitalism is productive investment in factories etc., and what makes the capitalist economy spin is spending, not saving. 
Please explain how saving is a tax on workers.  
What drives capitalism imho is indeed as you say 'productive investment'.  I don't see how 'spending, not saving' gets in there.  In order to have something to invest, you first need savings.  Delaying your spendings on consumption goods to invest in efficiency improving production methods etc. allows for the creation of more or better quality goods, or with fewer work involved, so later you can get more shit for the same amount of effort.  Spending everything right here, right now achieves just the opposite.  


Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 06, 2014, 10:46:15 AM
Inflation is a diffuse tax, whereby government takes from society an amount equal to the amount of currency that exists times the inflation rate.  Each person pays that tax proportionally to the amount of currency that he has and how long he keeps it before spending it.

Yes, but don't middle class people typically have a larger percentage of their savings in fiat in a bank account, compared to wealthy individuals, making it an uneven tax?  For a wealthy individual it makes more sense to spend a large amount of his time investigating how best to invest his capital in various things, like housing, companies, art etc.. On the other hand, spending days to figure out how to get 0,5% more on your 300 dollar savings doesn't make much sense, so you might as well park it in a savings account.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 06, 2014, 10:46:15 AM
Like any tax, inflation tax not inherently evil: a good government should give it back to society as public services and infrastructure.  A  bad government may waste it (for example by rescuing failed banks), or use it for evil ends, but that is a separate problem.  But it is debatable whether inflation tax, as way to support the government, is more fair and effective than revenue tax, consumption tax, etc.. Experience seems to say it isn't: countries that abuse it generally have lousy economies.  Anyway, it is not a simple, black on white issue.
Agreed.



647. Post 9649394 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.35h):

This bitcoin market is sponsored by Lithium, get your bipolar disorder treated now !



648. Post 10053347 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.44h):

This shit is f-ing crazy.  
I had a game plan in mind (ugly spike downwards, decent recovery, then hopefully stabilization and slowly into new bullrun), but this Stamp hack makes everything so unpredictable in my book.

1) hacker has 19k to sell, bad press for bitcoin, exchanges probably trusted even less (although I expect bitstamp to survive and to be as fair as possible to their clients --> compare the swift response from the Stamp team to the months of doublespeak, lying and inconsistencies from Gox)
--> Bad

2) If Stamp keep their "capital reserve" in USD, I expect them to buy up a whole bunch of BTC in the short term to compensate for the BTCs lost.  This will probably happen sooner than the hacker is able to find a buyer for them.
--> Good in the short term


If we weren't at a pretty low price already, I'ld sell a bunch for trading purposes.  Now, I am clueless.



649. Post 10116928 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.46h):

Chart looks ugly imho.



650. Post 10135909 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.47h):

There is one buy offer at BFX that doesn't seem to get eaten, but the orders below it do.



651. Post 10148088 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: molecular on January 14, 2015, 08:12:47 AM
i just woke up  Lips sealed

what the fuck is going on?

this must be a nighmare


it is! wake up, dude!

lol  Grin



652. Post 10149644 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

What a show!



653. Post 10149868 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on January 14, 2015, 11:16:55 AM
fun fact : i got my credit card hacked two times on the net last year and each time my bank refund me within 10 days to protect me.

More than bitcoin can ever do

yes getting hacked is more than bitcoin can ever do.

yet they offered me a solution for e-transactions which can't be hacked anymore. They protected me from myself and i'm thankful for that.

Also, my money is safe in my banks unlike crypto addicts who can't quit their screen all day long and fears for their bag value every hour of every day.

Thanks to them i feel peaceful.
If you want peace and quiet you shouldn't be in bitcoin yet.  Wait a decade (or 2).



654. Post 10151956 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on January 14, 2015, 02:40:15 PM
What will friday bring. Cheesy
https://twitter.com/AdamGuerbuez/status/555289659958628352
(guy who twitted about stamp problems 24h before stamp went down...)
Looks like more bad news?

Learn to read: https://twitter.com/AdamGuerbuez/status/555293365567492097

Quote
when the news hits though, you will thank me, that is if you are holding onto a nice stash of BTC currently...

Pretty vague imho.  It could mean 'If you still have a nice stash, sell now, and you will be thankful that you still have some purchasing power left' too, no?  



655. Post 10152088 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

Quote from: niner on January 14, 2015, 02:59:06 PM
What will friday bring. Cheesy
https://twitter.com/AdamGuerbuez/status/555289659958628352
(guy who twitted about stamp problems 24h before stamp went down...)

More on Adam Guerbuez's background: here

Good to know.  Seems like a ruthless mindfucker.



656. Post 10157933 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.49h):

Looks like we might go for drop Nr. 2



657. Post 10294140 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on January 28, 2015, 11:27:40 PM
YES PRICE DOES NOT MATTER

Ok, lets crash to sub 25 dollar.

Let's not

You don't want cheap coins?



658. Post 10300117 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.54h):

Quote from: Sitarow on January 29, 2015, 02:50:23 PM
Seems the next few days up until Feb 1 there will be an attempt to lower BTC value in order to move unsold LTC into BTC followed by a pump of BTC and dump.

BTC-e and BITFINEX Push LTC BTC to LTC Value up and keep BTC USD Value down by Selling on the following exchanges for CNY.
If you see the trend reverse do not expect to easily sell ltc for btc because many bots will be outbidding you so you.

You will know when that starts and there being a up down cycle on OKCoin Houbi keeping LTC / USD Values low as BTC / USD values goes up and you will notice that the BTC/LTC price difference between BTC-e -5% and Bitfinex +5%.

Sorry, but I don't fully get what you are saying.  Seems to me you say: 'there are big traders, they have BTC and LTC, and they want to switch their LTC to BTC. '  

But I don't really get the mechanism.  Are the Chinese LTC/CNY traders so easily influenced by the LTC/BTC ratio on other exchanges?  Isn't the BTC/USD market much bigger than LTC/USD and LTC/BTC market?  Does it make sense volume/reward wise to try to manipulate the market like this?  



659. Post 10390282 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Just noticed on the main page of google trends: fourth most asked " what is" question of 2014 : "What is bitcoin?"



660. Post 10390919 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 07, 2015, 11:55:46 PM
When you said "purchase everyday things," I didn't realize you meant meth and child porn.  I stand corrected Undecided
As far as less shady stuff?  Those merchants accept dollars, not BTC.  That's why the BTC price is calculated for you at the moment of purchase from the real price.
I did mean everyday things. You said illegal items. I asked for proof. Non provided. Whatever, I'm off to do other things. Have a good day!
When was the last time you bought milk, butter or gas with bitcoin?  And I don't mean through a payment processor.
I know those coins get converted to fiat, but how is using a payment processor not 'using bitcoin to purchase things' ?  
Pretty weak comeback NLC, I expect higher quality trolling from you.



661. Post 10390961 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 08, 2015, 12:27:56 AM
-The fact that nobody is really interested in buying bitcoin to mainly use it as a currency aside from illicit goods, but more as a wild musical chairs speculation instrument.

-the fact that merchants "accepting bitcoin" just create more selling pressure. Spending bitcoin = dumping bitcoin.
Your first argument is a feeble attempt to push fallacy as fact.
Bitpay one of a few service providers says otherwise.

http://blog.bitpay.com/2015/02/04/bitcoin-and-bitpay-in-2014.html

That infographic is a masterpiece of misinformation.  Casual readers will think that the "23 billion USD (57% increase)" is usage for e-payments, but it is either the blockchain traffic or the trading volume at the exchanges.  BitPay has not released any meaningful numbers about the usage for e-payments through them.  Analysis of what seems to be their incoming wallet shows about 1000-2000 BTC per day, constant since mid 2013 at least, which may be miners paying their bills.  Excluding that component, BitPay's traffic seems to be a few hundred BTC per day, which would be perhaps 50 million (not billion) USD in 2014.  So, their unwillingness to post actual numbers is not surprising.

Also, needless to say, all of the companies that they list as "accepting bitcoin" infact do not accept bitcoins, only dollars.

Wow, so you mean that the part that says " bitcoin trading volume" might be about the bitcoin trading volume instead of e-payments.   Shocker !  What a masterpiece of misinformation....

Also, companies that "accept bitcoins" do in fact accept bitcoin. They might not hold the bitcoins, and convert them to fiat, but they do accept them.



662. Post 10391015 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: NotHatinJustTrollin on February 08, 2015, 12:34:37 AM
Very interesting article  Smiley
Interesting link indeed.  Always nice to have some numbers to put things in perspective.



663. Post 10391108 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 08, 2015, 12:41:35 AM
When you said "purchase everyday things," I didn't realize you meant meth and child porn.  I stand corrected Undecided
As far as less shady stuff?  Those merchants accept dollars, not BTC.  That's why the BTC price is calculated for you at the moment of purchase from the real price.
I did mean everyday things. You said illegal items. I asked for proof. Non provided. Whatever, I'm off to do other things. Have a good day!
When was the last time you bought milk, butter or gas with bitcoin?  And I don't mean through a payment processor.
I know those coins get converted to fiat, but how is using a payment processor not 'using bitcoin to purchase things' ?  
Pretty weak comeback NLC, I expect higher quality trolling from you.

Because you're using dollar or pound  or euro  to buy things.  That's why those things are priced in dollar  or euro  or pound, and BTC price is calculated at the exact moment you initiate the transaction.
If you enjoy the game of buying BTC with your money (paying a fee for the privilege), handing that BTC to a payment processor (which also profits from the deal because not charity), which, in turn, converts BTC to real money & pays the merchant you transact with, so that you can risk your money yet again on some shady exchange while BTC price pogoes around like it does ...breathe... you be my guest, but don't expect me to take your game seriously Undecided

No, I am using bitcoin to buy stuff that has a fixed price in fiat.  Of course the exchange fees don't make this a consumer friendly option yet for most use cases.  At the moment bitcoin enthusiasts are sponsoring exchanges and payment processors in order to make orders with bitcoin.  But we are still in the bootstrapping phase, not at an end equilibrium.  If I would be able to use my bitcoins almost anywhere, it removes an argument for not holding bitcoins ("can't spend them anywhere") and use cases where it might be desirable will start popping up.  eg.  going abroad and not having to exchange your fiat currencies.  The current volatility would still stop most people from doing that, but if the fees for acquiring bitcoins are lower than fees for converting fiat money, the expected value is positive.



664. Post 10391145 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 08, 2015, 12:53:34 AM
...
Also, companies that "accept bitcoins" do in fact accept bitcoin. They might not hold the bitcoins, and convert them to fiat, but they do accept them.

No.  They accept USD.  Their payment processor accepts BTC.  They do not.  They do not exchange it into USD  Their payment processor does.  They do not.  They never touch BTC .  Not at all.  How many times & in how many different phrasings must it be said to be understood? Why are such simple things so difficult for some here to grasp?

Smiley they don't accept YEN, CAD, CNY neither do they?

Edit: I don't mean to focus on your flawed perspective so I will let up.

In Japan they accept Yen.  In Canada they accept CAD, in China they accept CNY.  Just how clueless r u bro?

Shit dude, how long are we going to be nitpicking over the fact that you pay for stuff from these companies using bitcoin, even if those bitcoins get converted to fiat.



665. Post 10391279 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 08, 2015, 01:04:02 AM
When you said "purchase everyday things," I didn't realize you meant meth and child porn.  I stand corrected Undecided
As far as less shady stuff?  Those merchants accept dollars, not BTC.  That's why the BTC price is calculated for you at the moment of purchase from the real price.
I did mean everyday things. You said illegal items. I asked for proof. Non provided. Whatever, I'm off to do other things. Have a good day!
When was the last time you bought milk, butter or gas with bitcoin?  And I don't mean through a payment processor.
I know those coins get converted to fiat, but how is using a payment processor not 'using bitcoin to purchase things' ?
Pretty weak comeback NLC, I expect higher quality trolling from you.

Because you're using dollar or pound  or euro  to buy things. That's why those things are priced in dollar  or euro  or pound, and BTC price is calculated at the exact moment you initiate the transaction.
If you enjoy the game of buying BTC with your money (paying a fee for the privilege), handing that BTC to a payment processor (which also profits from the deal because not charity), which, in turn, converts BTC to real money & pays the merchant you transact with, so that you can risk your money yet again on some shady exchange while BTC price pogoes around like it does ...breathe... you be my guest, but don't expect me to take your game seriously Undecided

No, I am using bitcoin to buy stuff that has a fixed price in fiat.  Of course the exchange fees don't make this a consumer friendly option yet for most use cases.  At the moment bitcoin enthusiasts are sponsoring exchanges and payment processors in order to make orders with bitcoin.  But we are still in the bootstrapping phase, not at an end equilibrium.  If I would be able to use my bitcoins almost anywhere, it removes an argument for not holding bitcoins ("can't spend them anywhere") and use cases where it might be desirable will start popping up.  eg.  going abroad and not having to exchange your fiat currencies.  The current volatility would still stop most people from doing that, but if the fees for acquiring bitcoins are lower than fees for converting fiat money, the expected value is positive.

If I said "can't spend BTC anywhere," you would be justified in asking me to defend such a silly statement.  But since I didn't, and you tried to stuff those words into my mouth, I won't.

The problem isn't that you can't spend BTC. You can spend anything, including rusty VW Beatles and recyclable plastic bottles.  Though recyclable plastic bottles are a far better store of value than BTC, neither one of us would suggest that they're money.  Not even if a bum agrees to take them to a redemption center and exchange them for money in exchange for a small fee or totally ripping you off.
I have paid for food with bitcoin multiple times, haven't used a rusty VW Beatle yet.  
At least now you are acknowledging that BTC can be used to pay for normal stuff, despite your derision by comparing it to plastic bottles as a would-be-money.
I think I'll be leaving the discussion at that though, don't want to spam the entire thread.




666. Post 10391303 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: criptix on February 08, 2015, 01:21:42 AM
so everyone accepting paypal is actually not accepting $, € or any other fiat currency?

Of course.  The currency that they accept is one thing, the means through which they receive the currency is another thing.  Last time I checked, Dell USA accepted only dollars, but you could send the dollars in one of several ways: PayPal, credit card, bank wire, old-fashioned checks, -- or BitPay.  Likewise, Dell would pay refunds only in dollars, even if you paid with BitPay.

Quote
what happens when paypal will integrate btc this year? still nobody accepting bitcoin?
they do accept bitcoin as payment, the just dont hold it.

Either PayPal will do the conversion to dollars and send dollars to the merchant, like BitPay does; or most merchants that accept payment via BitPay will not accept bitcoins through Paypal.

exactly.

for example i want to buy something outside my country:

1. i load up paypal with local currency
2. buy something online in a different currency
3. paypal processes the payment

there is actually no difference at all between what paypal does and bitpay does.

what follows is that merchants are accepting bitcoin and not only $ Smiley
I think he would argue that the merchant doesn't accept your local currency.  It's a matter of terminology really.



667. Post 10391783 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.57h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 08, 2015, 02:33:45 AM
To be honest you are assuming that they are not keeping a % of the payment in BTC with their payment processor.

Some merchants may do that (just as some merchants actuall accept bitcoin directly, without BitPay's intermediation).  But I am pretty sure that Dell, Microsoft, Wikipedia, etc. do not.  Handling bitcoins requires extra work from accoutants, which is not worth the amount of payment received.  Losses from bitcoin price variations (as Overstock and Fortress suffered) would have to be reported in the quarterly reports, and would be hard to justify to stockholders.

Quote
Also what is important to note is that BTC like USD,CAD,YEN,CHY,GBP and any other currency is being accepted for payment Cheesy

SIgh.  No, it is not the same thing.  Dell USA does accept USD, because you can wire USD to their bank account directly. They do not accept CAD,YEN,CHY,GBP nor BTC, and you cannot send them any of those currencies directly; you must send them to some other company, that converts them to USD and sends the USD to Dell.

Jorge, can't you see that we are arguing about what 'accepting' means?  Everybody agrees about the model, the underlying chain of events that takes place during and after a payment (if a company chooses to get paid fully in fiat).  It's just that when a company allows you to pay for products in BTC, I call that "accepting BTC", whereas for you "accepting" apparently means whatever you are getting paid by the payment processor at the end of the process.  



668. Post 10644011 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.02h):

Quote from: 12345mm on March 03, 2015, 04:13:52 PM
"Wordpress received only slightly over 100 BTC payments in 2014

Commenting on the recent removal of the Bitcoin payment option from the Wordpress subscription screen, founder Matt Mullenweg revealed the site received only two payments a week in Bitcoin during 2014, but plans to reinstate the payment option for “philosophical” reasons.

"The volume has been dropping since launch, in 2014 it was only used about twice a week, which is vanishingly small compared to other methods of payment we offer. […] We supported Bitcoin for philosophical reasons, not commercial ones."

       Cheesy
    CheesyCheesyCheesy
 CheesyCheesyCheesyCheesyCheesy

Yeah, 20 grand worth of bitcoins... Barely walking-around money.

Exactly! Especially if you add that they didn't have to pay anything to use this payment method or keep it on their site.

I bet you there was an accountant somewhere with his knickers in a knot.

100 btc payments is not the same thing as 100 btc in payments ... right?
Twice a week adds up to more than 100 payments, so I guess they mean 100 btc in payments.



669. Post 10760374 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: Cassius on March 13, 2015, 10:52:56 AM
Based on my time here roughly 99% of people posting charts have literally no idea what they are doing & it's more often than not just what they want to happen.
They then go ahead & make a bull shit chart to try & convince themselves it'll happen.

Who are the successful/professional traders here?
I'd like to interview a few for a series. Obviously 'I once made $100 in a bubble' doesn't count.
TERA, but he's not around anymore.



670. Post 10763897 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: Feri22 on March 13, 2015, 12:34:41 PM
Based on my time here roughly 99% of people posting charts have literally no idea what they are doing & it's more often than not just what they want to happen.
They then go ahead & make a bull shit chart to try & convince themselves it'll happen.

Who are the successful/professional traders here?
I'd like to interview a few for a series. Obviously 'I once made $100 in a bubble' doesn't count.
TERA, but he's not around anymore.

How do you know he or she was successfull trader?? I remember she or he was wrong many times, which i believe is the reason why she or he is not posting anymore

Not sure, but I think so because, while being a bit too bearish in general, TERA seemed to get the big calls right on beforehand.  Moreover, he claimed to have an impressive percentage of return.  Easy to lie about that of course, but he didn't strike me as the type.

BTW: the 'she' thing was invented by BJ Allen if I recall correctly.  Wall Observer soap drama  Wink.



671. Post 10789695 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: oda.krell on March 16, 2015, 10:19:29 AM
I thought it would obviously have to be time invariant. Doesn't TA only depend on the data in the chart? I don't know much about TA, but Wikipedia and Investopedia say that TA is based on the study of past market data, primarily price and volume. This seems to implicate that if the same pattern emerges in the charts in April or June, the conclusions should be the same. Same for a market moving slow or fast. If all trades are done at half the speed, shouldn't the conclusions on the same pattern (but stretched twice as long in time) be the same? And isn't the model describing a bear trap and a bull trap essentially the same, just applied inverted?

I know there's a kind of "law" in (amateur, perhaps also professional) algorithmic trading that your strategy should be time invariant. Some even go as far as saying it should be market invariant. In reality, I think it's more a heuristic to find out if the "pattern" you think you detected is just noise, or if you're onto something.

This is completely 'finger in the air', but I sometimes think that certain patterns that seem to be a good predictor emerge across different time scales (hence, motivation for the above "law"), but they're not equally important/active across all scales.

EDIT: The previous paragraph would still be compatible with "TA is based on the study of past market data, primarily price and volume. This seems to implicate that if the same pattern emerges in the charts in April or June, the conclusions should be the same" I would argue: you could simply be missing one variable, say, something like "total volume necessary until pattern x becomes active/has a strong enough influence on the market".



To come to your counter question, I cannot exclude that a signal is useless (usable?) because it lags. Even more, since this signal is interpreted by humans with neural networks in their heads, they can very well learn how to interpret them without understanding them (as we do with so many things). Simply by training. One doesn't need to have an explicit  model that makes sense. And when many people start acting on a certain signal (even if it's not based on a proper model and it doesn't make sense), the very fact that a significant part of the actors take that signal into account creates a self fulfilling prophecy. So yes, that may very well constitute an exploitable pattern. Wink

That was the point I was trying to make. I believe "chartism"/TA is more than just a self-fulfilling prophecy, but there is some self-fulfilling aspect to it, mainly in the form of the exact points of resistance/support.

What I mean is: Some combination of signals tells traders "market is bearish, even though we're currently going up" (the non circular part of TA). Next question, where exactly to go short? "Hm, let's say DSMA50. Seems like a good place as any." After the first few sell at exactly that point, it becomes a "point of heavy resistance" (the circular part of TA).

/my 2 crackpot cents Cheesy

I am not a TA expert (I just stare at charts without a clearcut method), but my theoretical take on TA is that in order to be successful it has to describe/utilize human valuation psychology (and the bugs and quirks therein).

If that's the case, given that the human brain has a memory function, and thus has been 'trained' by prior price action, it makes sense that your price prediction signals could vary over time as well, no?



672. Post 10789791 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.04h):

Quote from: inca on March 16, 2015, 12:28:48 PM
I am not a TA expert, but my take on TA is that in order to be successful it has to describe/utilize human valuation psychology (and the bugs and quirks therein).
If that's the case, given that the human brain has a memory function, and thus has been 'trained' by prior price action, it makes sense that your price prediction signals could vary over time as well, no?
I generally think of market price movements in terms of the madness and delusion of crowds, rather than the actions of lots of individuals. Does the mob have a memory?
While it might be easier to model a mobs behavior as something different entirely, the truth is of course that a mob is comprised of individuals (keeping in mind that individuals act differently in various situations).  So yes, the mob has a memory.



673. Post 10813114 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: fuckoffstolfi on March 18, 2015, 03:38:08 PM
Fuck off Stolfi, you're a turd in the swimming pool.
Fuck off yourself.  At least Stolfi has some interesting arguments from time to time, even if I usually disagree with them.
You are just a disgrace for the community.



674. Post 10813662 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.05h):

Quote from: xyzzy099 on March 18, 2015, 04:21:05 PM
Stolfi likes making senseless arguments to FUD. Come on, Jorge, I'm still waiting for a demostration for your claim!


(Before you scream "21 million": that bitcoin limit is "guaranteed" only by  fuzzy arguments about a complicated economic game, not "by math", and could be changed if the right players agreed to it.  Moreover, any kid can duplicate the amount of bitcoins in existence by creating a hard fork of the blockchain and starting to mine it on his laptotp.  Anyone who has bitcoins will gain an equal amount of those "series B" bitcoins, accessible through the same private keys, and could trade them independently of his old bitcoins by duplicating his wallet and downloading the kids's client software. Whether those "series B" bitcoins will get a significant market value is a market(ing) question, not a technical one.  And, of course, there are the altcoins.)


+1

I would be curious to see this demonstrated as well.
There is nothing to demonstrate.  If I understand correctly, he is just saying anybody can create an altcoin in which the initial ledger of ownership is taken over from bitcoin.  Of course, hardly anybody would see this as "being able to duplicate bitcoins".  

Of course this is not a technical issue.  To it sounds a bit like saying "passwords you can use on 1 website can be used on another website, therefore internet security is flawed".



675. Post 10849201 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2015, 01:43:42 AM
In fact, I think that the desire for "permanent wealth", that cannot be lost or lose its value, is as naive as the desire for eternal youth or eternal life...

How is the desire for eternal youth naive?

Before airplanes were built, it would be easy to call the desire for human flight naive, especially given the stupid first attempts (people attaching wings to their arms and jumping off buildings).  A real discussion should entail the feasibility or impossibility of something based on its properties, not just "it's something people have been wanting since forever, and they haven't accomplished it yet, therefore it is impossible and a stupid idea".

I am very curious as to your objections why eternal youthfulness would not one day (probably far into the future) be feasible.



676. Post 10849719 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2015, 12:29:21 PM
I am very curious as to your objections why eternal youthfulness would not one day (probably far into the future) be feasible.
Natural evolution does not "want" eternal organisms, not even eternal species; it "wants" life to constantly evolve.

Death is a feature, not a bug.  It evolved in the last billion years together with sex and reproduction, as a way to clear up space for new individuals.

Maybe one day that "solution" will no longer be necessary, because we will have infinitely expandable space and resources for everyone to live forever.  But the fact is that humans inherited death from their ancestors, and have evolved their body and society around it.

Everything in our body and mind was designed and adapted by evolution assuming a finite life of ~80 years plus or minus 20 (rough guesses).  Total planned obsolescence.

Human lifespan has evolved to be among the longest among mammals, actually, because that was needed by our nature and life cycle: a bigger brain takes much longer to program, so we need 14-20 years of learning before we are ready to leave our family and start a new one.

And we live for many years after we are no longer needed as parents, because we still have some use as teachers, babysitters, sentinels, etc..

Aging is the decomissioning of body and mind parts that are not intended to be used beyond a certain stage in life.  Our very desires and values change, because we are meant to have different roles in society at each stage in life.  

If we were to live forever, we could not be the same humans as we are today, we would have to change our body and mind and become something quite different.

If a dinosaur could wish for eternal life, would it want to evolve to a monkey, or to be an eternal dinosaur?

Does a child of five really wish to become an adult? Or just do the things that only adults can do, while remaining a child?
Sorry for the off-topic everybody, but it's not like the bitcoin price is doing anything interesting  Wink .

1) You provide no arguments that eternal youthfulness is not feasible, you only state that it is indesirable for a species.  Personally, I think it is very desirable for an individual, and probably for society as well.

2) Aging is not a 'planned removal of individuals'.  Please describe how the gradual loss of strength, memory functions, etc..  is evolutionary positive.  How does the presence of elderly people that need help for everything benefit society?  Wouldn't evolution program death in a way that individuals suddenly drop dead after a certain time?
Your reasonings sound like rationalisations to calm the mind to me ("I shouldn't worry, everything is as it should be, everything has a reason")

Sure, there are some genes that can be deleted for a longer life in certain species, but these are generally trade-offs versus other properties (for example lower activity and metabolism).

I do believe that the evolutionary need for a long-living individual wasn't very high (partially because most individuals died much sooner), so our metabolic programming isn't perfected to keep cells functioning forever, resulting in wear and tear.




677. Post 10850052 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on March 22, 2015, 01:17:15 PM
7 billion mofos on the planet and "eternal life desirable for society?".
U w0t m8?
I think it might even be possible eventually, but definitely not desirable IMHO. Fuck no.
You just indicated yourself that even without eternal life, overpopulation is/ is going to be an issue.Maybe if we know we are going to stay around forever, we'll actually have a strong incentive to figure out a solution for overpopulation.



678. Post 10851373 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2015, 03:21:04 PM
Natural evolution does not "want" eternal organisms, not even eternal species; it "wants" life to constantly evolve.
Death is a feature, not a bug.  It evolved in the last billion years together with sex and reproduction, as a way to clear up space for new individuals.

You provide no arguments that eternal youthfulness is not feasible, you only state that it is indesirable for a species.

I would not say "undesirable".  I put "want" in quotes because species and natural evolution have no desires (thanks Lamb for seeing that  Wink)  It is just that being mortal is part of being what we are.  

Yes, and 'being unable to fly' is part of what we are, ... until it isn't.  You seem very keen on keeping things like they are, even if they are undesirable.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2015, 03:21:04 PM
Quote
Personally, I think it is very desirable for an individual, and probably for society as well.

It may be hard to believe, but, after a certain point in life, that desire usually goes away.
Perhaps if your body was youthful and energetic, you would reconsider that point.  Also, if people really didn't want to be alive, it's easy enough to blow your brains out.  I can't help but notice that most people don't do this, which seems to suggest they value being alive.



Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2015, 03:21:04 PM
But yes, we generally hate succumbing to old age and death, just like we hate getting sick and weak.  That wish must be a naturally evolved trait too, like "you must leave soon, but, as long as you are here, you must try to be as useful as you can" --- and that includes remaining as fit and healthy as you can.

It is not different from how companies treat their older employees.  Indeed, retirement is the corporate version of natural death.  It was invented not for the good of the individual, but for the good of the company: a barely delicate way to remove the old guys whom no one dares to fire, and open space for new blood.
There is that " Everything is as it should be" thinking again.  Like we are now evolved into a perfect end state, I don't buy it.
If people didn't get old, they would be able to keep functioning in their company, and there would be no need to fire them.




Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2015, 03:21:04 PM
A finite lifetime is nature's solution to make space for new individuals.  Aging is a consequence of that.
I think you have things backwards.  There is no planned design to remove old individuals.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2015, 03:21:04 PM
Quote
Your reasonings sound like rationalisations to calm the mind to me ("I shouldn't worry, everything is as it should be, everything has a reason")
Not at all. I am as unhappy at getting old as anyone else.  I am just pointing out that eternal youth (which implies eternal life) is a rather complicated concept, perhaps a meaningless one.
Does it make sense to wish for a car that will last forever?
Does it make sense to wish for your dear Volkswagen Beetle to last forever?
My Volkswagen Beetle has no consciousness.  Replace Volkswagen with a pet dog, and then yes, I would want it to live forever.  
You also seem to be under the impression that biological change is no longer possible if we would acquire eternal youth.  I would say that current and future biotech advances will allow us to adapt much more quickly to our environment than was previously possible (although it might be harder to adapt an existing organism than to engineer a new one from scratch).

I can only repeat that you don't give any arguments that eternal youth is infeasible, you just argue that it is better for the species if individuals die off.  
I would argue that people make decisions as individuals, so your musings are irrelevant.



679. Post 10851427 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: empowering on March 22, 2015, 03:52:17 PM
As for it not being desirable, or human, I believe it to be both.

Sure it will mean all sorts of changes for society and the way we live,  no doubt, some positive and some negative, and society will no doubt struggle to keep up, but that will not stop it from happening.

We have already done life extension, as a race, and we will of course without any doubt, continue to do so, and we will get better at it, and it is feasible it will happen in many of our lifetimes.

Basically we would adapt, and evolve, as life does, we would create new education, new mechanisms, new understandings, new philosophy, new stages to life, it would change everything, but that has never ever stopped humans from doing anything, and that is not going to change now.

Life extension, to an extreme level, is pretty much inevitable, it is just a case of when, not if. I think it is all together a very common human desire to be alive and healthy, I think it is going to be possible to extend lifespan from a technological point of view. So when you couple those two facts together, you are just left with the WHEN we will get there, and not IF.  So really as a society we need to start working on ways to deal with this technology, and its implications for society/humanity.

Personally I am totally up for it.
Damn straight brother !



680. Post 10853059 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2015, 06:36:53 PM
You provide no arguments that eternal youthfulness is not feasible, you only state that it is indesirable for a species.
I would not say "undesirable".  I put "want" in quotes because species and natural evolution have no desires (thanks Lamb for seeing that  Wink)  It is just that being mortal is part of being what we are.  
Yes, and 'being unable to fly' is part of what we are, ... until it isn't.  You seem very keen on keeping things like they are, even if they are undesirable.
And you seem obsessed with reading things in my words that I did not write, even when I write just the opposite...  Where did I say that we should not be immortal or ethernally young?  Where did I say that things should not change not evolve? Where did I say that we should not improve our lives?  Where did I say that life and youth extension are impossible?

Then why did you call the desire for eternal youth naive?  Why not state clearly what your opinion on the matter is?

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2015, 06:36:53 PM
I wrote explicitly that we are absolutely not adapted to our present environment...

I guess that you are missing the point.  We cannot be eternally young while being the same human beings that we are now.  As one gets old, memories and experiences change our view of things.   When thinking about things like bitcoin today, I cannot avoid recalling what I read and thought of nuclear power, space exploration,  nulear fusion, artificlal inteligence, etc, over the past 50 years, and what happened to them.  Those memories and the conclusions that I got out of them are what make me today.  But it is also the past memories and experiences that make old people more cynical, careless, less enthusiastic, less focused, etc. -- even if the intelligene and clarity of memory remain the same.

(For example, my 4 years as head of department changed completely my view of universities and humans, for the worse...  Sometimes I wish that I had not gone through that experience, and retained a more positive view of some of my colleagues; but at the same time I don't want to forget what I learned then...  It is because of such experiences that I cannot share the respect that you have for people like Gavin, Sielbert, Adreeessen, Antonopoulos, etc., even though I am not aware of them doing anything really wrong...)

So, what does it mean to "be eternally young" --- erase one's memories, and be forever enthusiastic and naive and inexperient as a 20 year old? Or keep piling up memories for centuries, and becoming every time more bored and cynical, thinking more and more about the past rather than the future,  etc? Or modifying the brain in some way, so that it can continue putting up memories without somehow becoming overburdened by them?  Neither option seems to be exactly what we want.

Yes, you did write explicitly that we are not adapted to our present environment, and I agree.
But then I don't get why you keep hammering on the 'evolution choose this length of life' argument.
Yes people grow to be more or less 70-80 years old these days, so what?  I might be misinterpreting your words again, but your arguments sound somewhat teleological to me.

As for changing as an individual:  we are constantly slowly changing into a somewhat different being.  We keep forgetting stuff, and learn new things all the time.  Why would continuing to do that be so fundamentally wrong?  You don't know yet what form a cure for aging would take.  Who says we would be so radically different from today?  You say certain outcomes are less than ideal.  How ideal is the current situation, to live in a withering body?  I'ld prefer some change.

I know young people are more naive, and think things can change easily.  They don't see the barriers to this change that exists in human nature and society (or just vastly underestimate the amount of work and time that is required).  Older people have seen things fail, so they are less naive, but often they are too sceptical of change, and disbelieve even the things that do come to happen.

By the way, I never said I had any respect for Silbert, I haven't really looked into him but he gives me somewhat of a 'pumper' impression.
 
Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2015, 06:36:53 PM
I ask again: if a dinosaur could choose, would it choose to become a monkey, or live forever as a dinosaur?
I don't pretend to be able to read the mind of a dinosaur.  As for humans: I guess everybody will chose the degree to which they want to change themselves.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 22, 2015, 06:36:53 PM
Quote
A finite lifetime is nature's solution to make space for new individuals.  Aging is a consequence of that.
I think you have things backwards.  There is no planned design to remove old individuals.
I don't know what you mean, but clearly the average length of our lifetime is the result of millions of years of evolution.  While it can be stretched a bit with current technology, our bodies and minds are not built to last more than that.  As in an old car, all the parts start to fail after some time.  (It is not just the telomers getting shorter...)  That average lifetime is clearly what natural evolution found to be best for our species (and all mammal species I know of) until we started making fire and bows.  Since then, it is not clear where evolution is taking us...
Old cars can be fixed, and still drive around today (old timers).  
How 'bout we fix our bodies so they ARE built to last longer than a few decades?


Oh, and : CHOO CHOO  Grin



681. Post 10880219 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: Bitcoiner_cph on March 25, 2015, 09:13:17 AM
bitcoin is overrated and overpriced

For now though, yes it is, maybe Bitcoin should go under $100 and stabilize the price. But if it goes too low, the miners will become unprofitable and they will leave.

Miners will leave well before $100


What happens if the price go under 100 dollar, will miners leave and bitcoin die???
Stop thinking in absolutes.  Some miners will leave, mining difficulty will drop and the remaining miners will become profitable again...



682. Post 10880254 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.06h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on March 25, 2015, 09:18:18 AM
bitcoin is overrated and overpriced

For now though, yes it is, maybe Bitcoin should go under $100 and stabilize the price. But if it goes too low, the miners will become unprofitable and they will leave.

Miners will leave well before $100

The miners are not needed anyway, since most mining runs through only a few pools.
The security the network is only supported by the security of the biggest pools. If the biggest pools, that make up at least 51% together, are compromised, then the integrity of the network is also compromised. And it doesn't matter how much hashrate is backing those pools.
*faceplant*
And of course miners can't switch mining pools  Roll Eyes .
EDIT: And whether it cost a billion or a few dollars to create your own mining farm that controls >50 percent of the network doesn't matter at all...



683. Post 10884901 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: dakota neat on March 25, 2015, 06:12:17 PM
i'm now officially short on food to buy bitcoin.  Kiss
That's not a healthy situation bro  Undecided



684. Post 10920730 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.07h):

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on March 29, 2015, 01:56:29 PM
The Peter Todd Drama is just heating up, with the potential of essentially forking the development team. If there ever was a time where "fundamentals" stand on dubious grounds it's now.

Links?
Yes link please.
I guess he is talking about this: https://medium.com/@octskyward/replace-by-fee-43edd9a1dd6d .

I doubt it is such a big deal though, just a proposal that is being shot down.



685. Post 10964987 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.08h):

Quote from: Wandererfromthenorth on April 02, 2015, 09:51:53 PM
Distributed ledgers/databases/networks that rely less and less on cryptocurrencies.

Simply put, today cryptotokens "are there" because that was the only security mechanism for a blockchain/consensus ledger to work that we know of. Cryptocurrencies are not really needed for themselves and they have a lot of problems that make them almost unusable as actual currencies (aside for illicit goods).

If you don't use POW or POS for getting consensus, don't you automatically end up with a centralized system?  Honest question.



686. Post 11029868 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.10h):

Urgh, had a short on LTC/USD on bitfinex but chickened out at a small loss at 1.7 .   Kicking myself right now  Cry

Oh well....

I am staying on the sidelines for a while, let's see how all this plays out.



687. Post 11233335 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 29, 2015, 02:55:00 AM
this plot



that shows that the number of deposits per day into BitPay's receiving wallet was quite flat through most of 2014, and increased by a factor of ~3 since mid-2013; whereas this plot



shows that the bitcoin volume of those deposits has been constant at ~1000 BTC/day since Jan/2013.  (Explaining these numbers is not trivial, but they definitely contradict the claims of "booming adoption", and are consistent with may other indications that usage for e-payments is stagnant at best.)
This sounds plausible to me.  I would say that a stagnant usage for e-payments is quite good given the >1 year bear market (with the resulting decrease of new blood). 



688. Post 11236818 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: closed today on April 29, 2015, 01:18:24 PM
... I would say that a stagnant usage for e-payments is quite good given the >1 year bear market (with the resulting decrease of new blood).  

What's the rational thing to do when the value of a currency is falling?
That's right, *spend it*. As fast as you can.

Nice trolling try, but not really.  
The rational thing to do, would be to spend it if the future price would be lower, and buy it if the future price would be higher.
However, the fact is that you can only know for sure what the price has done in the past.  Trying to predict the future is speculation.




689. Post 11243664 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: findftp on April 30, 2015, 12:54:53 PM
I just had a 235.07 sell order filled, from a 214.xx buy barely a week ago. Im happy.  Grin
Congratulation to your 5$ profit!! I am really happy for you   Cheesy
235-214=5? You were perma-high on a math in school? Grin
Well, maybe there was only 0,5 BTC traded?
I know, I'm a genius.
0,25
You're the genius.
0.2380952380952381 (assuming no trading fees) --> I want to be called a genius too...  Grin



690. Post 11243782 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.13h):

Quote from: SkyValeey on April 30, 2015, 01:06:44 PM
0.2380952380952381 (assuming no trading fees) --> I want to be called a genius too...  Grin

I call you GENIUS. High-class calculator operator.


Yeehaww, I knew those years of intense practicing would pay off.  Gonna print this post and let my mummy stick it to the refrigerator Grin .
--> ok, I am done being off topic for now.  Wink



691. Post 11305946 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.14h):

Microtriangle forming?

Good show anyway  Grin



692. Post 11594419 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.17h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 11, 2015, 04:13:15 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/maxkeiser/status/608999235149692929
If he really convinced them, thank you Mr. Keiser!
What a guy.

Max Keiser is a Pump-and-Dumping scammer.  In my book he deserves zero respect, even if he gets it right once in a while (which he will of course loudly publicize, in order to build enough credit to initiate his next P&D).



693. Post 11640397 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Such mini-parabole.  Much Wow!


To clarify: I think the price moved up relatively fast right now, but on the other hand, in the big picture it is a very minor upmove, and there seems to be some sceptism (which is natural after a prolonged bear market).  I don't expect a big crash, likely some consolidation or perhaps a bigger runup with a larger correction.  (EDIT: all predictions for the short-term, on the medium term, I would expect further stabilization or a minor upmove)



694. Post 11640728 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: Dotto on June 17, 2015, 10:42:48 AM
It is really possible to arb BTC with LTC? Or with XMR?. Since they are based in BTC seems like a flawed logic...
They are not 'based in BTC'.  
LTC or XMR or any other cryptocurrency can be used to quickly get funds from 1 exchange to another.  As long as the LTC/BTC or XMR/BTC pair remains the same at 2 exchanges, while there is a difference in the USD/BTC exchange rates, you can use it to arb.  Thing is that the LTC/BTC pairs have less liquidity, and will probably quickly become the same or similar at the various exchanges.  (I don't have any experience doing this, just based on theory)



695. Post 11640775 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on June 17, 2015, 11:05:34 AM
It is really possible to arb BTC with LTC? Or with XMR?. Since they are based in BTC seems like a flawed logic...
They are not 'based in BTC'.  
LTC or XMR or any other cryptocurrency can be used to quickly get funds from 1 exchange to another.  As long as the LTC/BTC or XMR/BTC pair remains the same at 2 exchanges, while there is a difference in the USD/BTC exchange rates, you can use it to arb.  Thing is that the LTC/BTC pairs have less liquidity, and will probably quickly become the same or similar at the various exchanges.  (I don't have any experience doing this, just based on theory)

I'm not sure if whoever's hoarding LTC is trying to make money on the arb or just trying to manage the BTC pump.
hoarding is very different from arbing.  Arbing (arbing BTC prices and using LTC as a money transfer between exchanges)  would't move up the price of LTC (only very slightly), as it would get sold again on the other exchange after a few minutes.



696. Post 11640963 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on June 17, 2015, 11:28:57 AM
Retard question: Is it reasonable to assume that the LTC is being bought to help distribute the pump then or are these things totally unrelated?

I think people buying LTC buy it to make a profit.  Either they expect BTC to rise significantly, and LTC to rise even more (EDIT: because LTC tends to be an exaggerated version of BTC), or they think they are frontrunning the reward halving.  



697. Post 11731404 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: Erdogan on June 27, 2015, 10:35:02 PM
"It has accurately predicted 200 of the last 2 recessions."

Good one.

It is 4 articles based on false visual comparison of nonrelated graphs with inconstent axes, 5 gold bug articles, and 1 good austrian economics article out of 10. Bitcoiners not welcome.

Edit: But I read it every day. They draw in relevant news.


Exactly.  Either the quality of the articles has gone down considerably the past few years, or I used to be an idiot to give them as much credit as I did (perhaps because I was very new to economics).



698. Post 11731533 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.18h):

Quote from: nanobrain on June 27, 2015, 10:53:07 PM
Quote
I don't think you are honest about your basic motives regarding bitcoin. I'm a 44 year old nuclear physics-guy.

Is there some sort of causality I'm missing here?

Jorge has successfully identified enough BTC scams over the years to warrant respect. Sadly, there will continue to be scammers as long as BTC attracts happy-clappy noob idiots who think they are financial geniuses.
I disagree with Jorge on most things wrt bitcoin, but he has more sensible stuff to say than the average poster.  I am glad he is on the forum, despite his pessimistics BTC view.



699. Post 11822422 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: oda.krell on July 08, 2015, 01:57:12 PM
Well, well, well... look at this. Seems like this old crypto horse isn't entirely worn out yet.

Doesn't this include the recent spam attacks/stress tests?



700. Post 11823115 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on July 08, 2015, 03:15:29 PM
People are making money with altcoins, while you're just sitting here with your bags full of bitcoins, praying for a 2% rise.
Slow people will always be slow. They were slow to discover bitcoin and they're too slow to jump ship when needed. I personally don't recommend financial speculation to people who are slow. There are more suitable ways for slow people to make money.

Looking for bagholders to unload?



701. Post 11823455 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: Mervyn_Pumpkinhead on July 08, 2015, 03:46:31 PM
When LTC et al. start losing 30-50% in a day, people will lose it all and regret playing altcoins with no bid depth. Its a double Edge sword  ..

This rise won't stop in the near future. The pump comes from China, and they aren't interested in working under western control. The western side has large majority control over existing bitcoins and the locations of mining farms. If Chinese won't pump bitcoin, then the miners will just slowly eat away value from the market and the currency will shrivel. Several practical alts will probably get aggressive takeovers and will be funded properly to provide better alternatives to bitcoin.

That at least would be my game theory of this situation.

 Yeah, great analysis, everybody knows China has almost no bitcoin mining farms ...  Roll Eyes    Please rationalize your pump some more.



702. Post 11829770 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

Quote from: cyclotronmajesty on July 09, 2015, 08:18:46 AM
Can I talk about Litecoin here or will I get censored again?

Does anyone know if this coin is EVER coming down again?

How does a trader even gauge risk in this kind of situation?

 Huh I just want to break even after my losses from bitcoin...

i'd be nice to actually make a buck trading.. never had that experience...

I've never seen money fly around like this. Kinda makes me sick actually.

Best way to make money trading is to buy into a speculative altcoin after it has multiplied several times and has gone parabolic, with daily increases >20%, when everybody is talking about it.
Also make sure to borrow lots of money and use a lot of leverage, to get even bigger profits (don't think about potential losses, dream about that expensive car you want).
Everybody else is making mad profits, don't miss out !  Greed is good! Buy Now!  At any Price, Profit is guaranteed!  Buy Buy !
......

--> For the braindead amongst us, that was sarcasm.  This is how your greedy emotions get played and you lose lots of money.

That being said, the amount of shorters on bitfinex is still quite high, so we could see a nasty squeeze before the pump bubble pops.




703. Post 11839796 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.20h):

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED ?!?!?




704. Post 11897999 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: Arriemoller on July 16, 2015, 08:53:23 PM
This document is fresh from the press, it's not yet availible in english för som odd reason, but if you can read any of the other 17 langugeses that it comes in it is very interesting.
In short, one of the Swedish  high courts has asked the European court for advice on where Europe stands on taxing the exchange of bitcoin to fiat and vice vesa. This in turn because a Swedish citizen appealed a decision from the Swedish tax authorties on paying tax for the exchange of bitcoins he is doing in his company.
The european advocat general Juliane Kokott suggests as a verdict that bitcoin should be regarded as a currency and not be taxed. The court usually go with the advocat generals suggestions.

http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?doclang=DE&text=&pageIndex=0&part=1&mode=DOC&docid=165919&occ=first&dir=&cid=388883

good news !



705. Post 11922674 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: 8up on July 20, 2015, 08:03:09 AM
Less than 24 hours until Bitcoin starts to rise again. Target 500-700.
My guess would be we consolidate for another week before doing that.



706. Post 12180592 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.23h):

Holy fuck, what a way to wake up!
Grumbles Grumbles stupid need for sleep !!



707. Post 12220626 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: cyclotronmajesty on August 23, 2015, 03:45:32 AM
So nobody jumping into Bitcoin from the recent global stock market crash?
But everyone sells because some guy on the internet releases a different version of the bitcoin client?
& Litecoin is not rallying before the halving in 2 days?
 Huh
Understanding this market is hopeless.
1)stock market crash is deflationary/risk off , bitcoin is high-risk, so my reading is a stock market crash is bad for bitcoin until it gets so bad that people either start fearing counterparty risk, or believe a new QE round is guaranteed.

2)"some guy" is showing a serious divide in the community

3) litecoin halving has been hyped for months now



708. Post 12232112 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 24, 2015, 06:52:11 PM
talk about block size limit is getting more and more Insane. conspiracy theories everywhere!
It seems somewhat logical that people who are generally more distrustful see the appeal of a "trustless" currency, and constitute a significant portion of the early adopters.



709. Post 12233252 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: Calabi–Yau Manifold on August 24, 2015, 11:20:42 PM
starting to think there no need to increase block size limit because bitcoin will soon not be used at all

no comment


I sold everything waiting to buy back sub 100, #besttraderever

Legendary Noob, bottom seller. Pathetic...
The only pathetic persons seems to be the one that can't see adam's banter for what it is.



710. Post 12240212 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: jertsy on August 25, 2015, 05:38:04 PM
Trading on bitfinex has resumed.

That's what happened last time but trading stopped again after about half an hour. How long will they manage to keep their trading engine running this time before it freezes, or is frozen deliberately by them for some reason or other? This has been happening too often.


sounds like every time the market moves in any major way they freeze .. apparently your only allowed to trade on bitfiniex if the market is moving sideways. they must have some serious issues over there.

I think it's frozen again, there have been no trades for the last 8 minutes. It seems like they give about half an hour's trading then freeze the market when it starts moving up or down by a few dollars. Gox used to attempt fixing their trading platform while it was running and Bitfinex seems to be attempting it now.

https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/3iccq1/bitfinex_frozen_again_for_btc/

"Update again:

We will be halting the trading engine again for a few minutes to update positions and balances with the trades."




711. Post 12241638 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.24h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on August 25, 2015, 08:19:34 PM
>225 <25mins

omfg i was right

this is a first.

Oh shit. What the hell is going to happen now?!?

He is now the Oracle.

So he'll keep talking nonsense, but he'll bake pie?
Ohh, what's really going to bake your noodle later on is, would btc still have broken it if he hadn't said anything?



712. Post 12249782 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: gentlemand on August 26, 2015, 05:02:49 PM

In Bitcoin the amount of USD you can throw around, unless you buy BTC with it, is pretty much irrelevant.

Yup.

Thusly the companies who facilitate USD/BTC or CNY/BTC exchanging are going to have an enormous amount of sway. All they have to do is ignore the chain they don't like and it's pretty much goodnight. It trickles down to payment processors, miners meeting bills and everything else.

Oh come on.  They will follow demand or be outcompeted very quickly.



713. Post 12249849 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.25h):

Quote from: gentlemand on August 26, 2015, 05:10:54 PM

Oh come on.  They will follow demand or be outcompeted very quickly.


Obviously they're going to follow the tide but no one operates in isolation. Their opinion counts.
That, I will agree with  Smiley



714. Post 12432284 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.26h):

Quote from: Elwar on September 15, 2015, 11:54:27 AM
"Bitcoins, like other commodities, have an intrinsic value, which is not arbitrary, but is dependent on their scarcity, the quantity of labour bestowed in procuring them, and the value of the capital employed in the miners which produce them." -David Bitcardo

Maybe you would also like to hear it from a long-term bull (though not bullish on the short term right now) instead of the bears: this is total nonsense.  If I spend one year polishing a turd, that doesn't mean a polished turd is worth >10000 USD.



715. Post 12843576 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: tarmi on October 31, 2015, 06:57:05 PM
I love a good bull run but we goin' down.





716. Post 12863203 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 02, 2015, 10:46:42 PM
one thing you should keep in mind: every penny of profit that a bitcoin investor makes can only come from the pocket of another bitcoin investor...
Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Like money right?

Did I ever tell you that only fools invest in currencies?
Up until now, that was a wise rule of thumb, when currencies were invariable inflated constantly.  That does not mean it is an absolute truth.  Indeed, why not invest in a currency with a fixed monetary base?  If it ends up being used, and the savings rate and money velocity remains the same, you will gain purchasing power equal to the increase in productivity increase and population growth.  Bitcoin is still experimental, but in the future it could end up becoming a standard and perhaps even the safest of all investments.


Quote from: becoin on November 02, 2015, 11:00:32 PM
Buying bitcons is not an investment. It is preserving the purchasing power of your capital.
At the moment, volatility is way too high to be 'preserving your purchasing power'.  It is not only an investment, but a wildly speculative one (but in my mind a very asymmetric one in risk/return).



717. Post 12867068 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.30h):

Quote from: Globb0 on November 03, 2015, 09:14:53 AM
OK so lets say hundreds of you guys are HODLERs with thousands of coins each.
What would be your check out point?
Do you worry about the other thousands of early adopters who must be waiting also to cash out ?
Most will diversify.  Quite a few will HODL or even accumulate more given the general mindset of the early bitcoin adopter. 

About everbody waiting to cash out: this process is taking place all the time.  People were saying "aren't you afraid people will sell out at $100, $1000 etc. (and most likely at $1 and $10 too)". If you believe bitcoin has true value, and is currently not overpriced, then you shouldn't worry about this in the long term (though psychological price points might play a role in short and middle-term speculation).



718. Post 12875991 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Dafuq?



719. Post 12885674 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Just stating the obvious, this market is fucking crazy.



720. Post 12886683 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: gizmoh on November 04, 2015, 06:56:12 PM
All exchanges been following huobi mad buying bot. Is "Wangli" the new Willy bot?
China is really relentless.  Looks like the other exchanges are trying to have a "normal" trading, but China just keeps chugging higher.  Makes me wonder to what degree MMM (or capital outflow or relaxed regulations) have an influence.



721. Post 12886898 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: AmazonStuff on November 04, 2015, 07:40:00 PM
I don't know what they are trying to do on Huobi, but clearly as more as Huobi gets disconnected, more money they burn, when they lose fuel, price will have downward slingshot effect, it's exchange rate will actually be below other exchanges. Just remember what happened to Mt.Gox, trading at $1200, other exchanges at $800-$900 and then trading at $10-80 while other exchanges were at $600, I would call this the ponzi pattern.

Unless these people want the money to go out of China asap.  Buy in Chinese exchange, and sell it on a western exchange.  Would also explain the premium.  
Or Ponzi suckers buy at Chinese exchange, Ponzi operating basterds sell on BTC-e.



722. Post 12887020 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on November 04, 2015, 07:47:46 PM
no one believes in the rally and it's up 100% in a month ... we got a long way to go.
You have got a point.  I don't think we are overvalued at the moment, but you have got to admit we are moving really really fast now, with very minor corrections.



723. Post 12888878 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.31h):

Man, if you traded this correctly you could have made fortunes.  I am just glad I got my coins back with a tiny bit extra, shit got too crazy for me.  



724. Post 12989565 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Thar she blows  Grin



725. Post 13007328 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Between the sociopathic trolls and paranoid tinfoils, I am starting to wonder why I hang around here.



726. Post 13007428 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: r0ach on November 18, 2015, 07:14:08 PM
Between the sociopathic trolls and paranoid tinfoils, I am starting to wonder why I hang around here.

I've noticed lots of people refer to the entity that's created 5000+ anti-bitcoin, pro-fiat, pro-cultural Marxism spam accounts as a "troll".  You need to be extremely stupid to believe such a thing.  It's obviously a paid for shill.  Nobody goes through such effort in creating so many spam accounts for no actual incentive.

Sure, it's possible the guy gets paid to troll these forums.  However, I think it is more likely that he is a daytrader that gets a kick out of his trolling, feeling like a somebody on these forums, as well as trying to influence the sentiment when he is shorting.



727. Post 13007475 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: r0ach on November 18, 2015, 03:53:40 PM
Since white genes are recessive, the white race would not exist if this ratio was higher.  Due to this, whether your Marxist mind acknowledges it or not, if you advocate that everyone on earth interbreed with each other with no regards to race, you are in fact advocating white genocide due to white genes (and Asian) being recessive.

It's pretty easy to verify this with virtually any interracial relationship that exists.  Take Heidi Klum for example.  Here's her with two of her kids, each from different fathers.  She's supposed to be a supermodel, yet has passed along virtually none of those supermodel genes onto one child, while clearly having done so for the other.  This is because white genes are recessive and it's hard to even tell the child on the left is related to her at all.  


What the fuck are 'supermodel genes'?  So you think the white kid is pretty and the other isn't.  That is totally subjective.

Also, with 'white genes', you only mean that teeny tiny amount that affect skin color, no?  Why would other genes in white people be recessive?



728. Post 13008186 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: madmat on November 18, 2015, 08:51:52 PM
I subscribe everything you said. The real solution would be eradicating relics which should be consigned to the dustbin of history: namely fanaticism and religion (any religion) through reason, but this is my very own point of view and far less likely.

Humans are regular animals.  Dogs bark at themselves in the mirror for no reason.  Some people do similar things.  The ones who try to classify humans as some type of creature far above the scope of the common animal will be the first to die once the Obama economy implodes.  In the words of The Watchmen movie, "Now the whole world stands on the brink staring down into bloody hell. All those liberals, and intellectuals, and smooth-talkers; and all of a sudden no one can think of anything to say."



Stop drugs and talk about bitcoin please.

Not much to talk about.  Price is flatlining.  Bitcoin enthusiasts suddenly need something else to fill the time.  



729. Post 13008342 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 18, 2015, 09:05:53 PM
And that survey (like many in the early days of DNA analysis) only looked at mitochondria or the Y chromosome, that are inherited from father or mother respectively and thus are easier to analyze.
I think you meant it the other way around.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on November 18, 2015, 09:05:53 PM
Quote
Since white genes are recessive, the white race would not exist if this ratio was higher.  Due to this, whether your Marxist mind acknowledges it or not, if you advocate that everyone on earth interbreed with each other with no regards to race, you are in fact advocating white genocide due to white genes (and Asian) being recessive.

It's pretty easy to verify this with virtually any interracial relationship that exists.  Take Heidi Klum for example.  Here's her with two of her kids, each from different fathers.  She's supposed to be a supermodel, yet has passed along virtually none of those supermodel genes onto one child, while clearly having done so for the other.  This is because white genes are recessive and it's hard to even tell the child on the left is related to her at all.  



First, there is no such thing as "white genes" and "black genes".  There are genes that produce the black skin pigment (an essential protection against sunlight), which are broken or inhibited in people with "white" skin.  There are other genes for eye color, hair color, hair wave, etc.  The frequency of those genes is very different among populations that have lived for millenia in relative isolation in northern Europe and Southern Africa (which can be explained by well-known environmental factors, as well as by random drift).  Hence, indeed, when individuals from those populations are brought together to the same place, the differences are visually striking.  But There are many more genes whose effects cannot be seen and do not significantly affect survival.  There are also many variants of the same gene whose effects are hard or impossible to see visually, and both populations have mixtures of the same variants.    

Some of your so-called "white" genes are indeed recessive (like blue eye color), but others are dominant, or have partial effect when two variants are present.  But a recessive variant of a gene is not "lost" when it gets paired with a dominant one: the children of two back-eyed persons may be blue-eyed.  Ditto for black or blond hair, curly or straight hair, etc..

The important point is that linkage between genes is limited and weak.  Therefore, when a "white" population mixes with a "black" one, the first generation children will have one copy of each kind for each gene, but after a couple of generations there will be all combinations -- WW, WB, and BB -- for each gene independently.   But the independence of gene mixing, by itself, would imply that racial classifications are meaningless, so "racial scientists" have conveniently developed a blind spot at that place in their minds.

As for that picture, it proves only that Americans have a high incidence of some peculiar genetic defect in their visual system, that renders them unable to perceive gradations of skin color and other "racial" traits.  A functioning non-American eye will see that the child at left has a mixture of skin color genes that results in a light brown skin, surely much lighter than the skin color of her African slave ancestor.   And you can be sure that she has close to a 50% mix of genes from her two parents, just like the child at right (apart from mitochondial genes and those in the X chromosomes, which they inherited from the mother alone).
Damn straight



730. Post 13034827 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.34h):

Quote from: galdur on November 21, 2015, 06:08:36 PM
An artist or an ape?

1


2


3


4

I'll play.  1 and 3 ape, 2 and 4 artist?



731. Post 13196749 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: oda.krell on December 09, 2015, 05:31:13 PM

short to mid-term hat on

Anyone else thinking ~$380 re-test on the horizon if ~410 doesn't hold?

short to mid-term hat off
My gamble would be we first make a run higher to 450 before going back to 380, but it's a wild guess, not putting any money on it.



732. Post 13197018 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.36h):

Quote from: Tzupy on December 09, 2015, 05:58:59 PM
Warning: I bought back at $402, probable crash incoming because my luck is usually terrible.

Sweet! Wished I could have caught 402.

Gotta set your buys before the price goes there, Pretty damn hard to catch falling knives.

You got that right. I'm up so I'm not complaining. I'm normally 2 bucks under the lows and miss em.

You are not the only one... Wink
I had a small buy order around 404.5 ..... Grin




.... but on Finex  Cry Cry Cry




733. Post 13202896 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 10, 2015, 07:26:43 AM
welcome back TERA

Despite the fact that rationally I should be unhappy at seeing good traders enter the competition, it's good to see you back man ! 



734. Post 13217771 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Halaman on December 11, 2015, 06:40:18 PM
Why everybody here is so bearish?

I still don't see reason for that in charts. Am I missing something?  Shocked

I see potential for a further rise before it corrects a bit.

That's usually a bullish sign.  One of the reasons I think this might go a bit higher still (despite being somewhat overbought).  



735. Post 13233243 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: bitebits on December 13, 2015, 09:25:57 AM
My transaction was included in the fourth block Huh  My last transaction earlier this week took 3 blocks Tongue  

btc is working just like it should be Roll Eyes

In case you need some rough fee estimate: http://bitcoinexchangerate.org/fees

Quote from: Current Recommended Bitcoin Network Transaction Fees
                                      USD cents   satoshis   BTC
To get in next block                   2.1   4831   0.00004832
To be confirmed in the next hour   2.2   5139   0.00005140
To be confirmed within 24 hours   2.0   4659   0.00004660
So next block is cheaper than next hour.... seems logical....



736. Post 13233611 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: TERA on December 12, 2015, 12:08:15 AM
Why torture yourself with following the market and trading if you're going to just use 2%? I only trade(d) to strike it rich and make significant increases in my btc, and I still hate it.
How did that work out for you?
The trading worked out very well.  I just hate being glued to the charts.  It completely consumes me. Even though I made these huge gain on 100% on my coins,  someone's I still just wish I'd rather have that year of my life back.  That's why I don't understand someone only using 2%.

For some of us, it is just a fun game, thus very enjoyable.  Then again, the difference in attitude might also result in a difference in trading performance.



737. Post 13235305 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Looks like it wants to make a small jump up



738. Post 13235376 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on December 13, 2015, 02:26:02 PM
Looks like it wants to make a small jump up
nailed it  Wink



739. Post 13235528 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: julian071 on December 13, 2015, 02:47:34 PM
Looks like it wants to make a small jump up
nailed it  Wink

Wow, nice one! How did you see that coming if I may ask?

Years of staring at the charts, combined with blind luck  Grin .



740. Post 13235548 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.37h):

Quote from: julian071 on December 13, 2015, 02:52:34 PM
Looks like it wants to make a small jump up
nailed it  Wink

Wow, nice one! How did you see that coming if I may ask?

Years of staring at the charts, combined with blind luck  Grin .

Lol. OK thx =D
Don't think we are done yet by the way, I am guessing this goes to 445-450.



741. Post 13567515 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Holy fuck, I was expecting it to go down after 430, but not so fucking fast.



742. Post 13582212 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: lyth0s on January 17, 2016, 06:59:51 AM
It sure is nice, sitting here lending out my fiat at >%20 annual return. I don't have to worry about dumps, crashes, hard forks or network congestion failures.  I don't care if it goes up, either, because that just boosts the interest rate I get paid.  



How much did you buy your account from the original owner for? I don't remember you being that emotional nor negative.
I actually remember him as being more emotional, but squarely in the bull camp.  I even think I like the "new" (don't think he sold his account) BJA better.



743. Post 13617316 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.41h):

Quote from: CuntChocula on January 20, 2016, 02:09:15 PM
Whatever it is that the economic majority thinks is more important. If it is sticking with the existing miner fleet, that's where the value ends up. If it is firing the existing miner fleet, that's where the value ends up. There is no answer you or I can state without that information that is more correct than another.

ELI5 the mechanism for the the "economic majority" to make its wishes known & relevant?

The market.

Quote
Assuming I hold 90% of all the coins mined to date (I'm economic majority), how do I go about this shit?

If you own 90% of the coins, you are the market. Obviously not realistic. In reality there are many participants, and they'll trade with one another and work it out. One fork will be worth more than the other, probably a lot more, but who knows.

90% was chosen at random. Let's say I own 5%, and keep in in cold storage, as a "store of value." How do I make my voice count?
Keep in mind, you edited out the important part:
<>If I'm just holding the coin (not solding), why do my wishes matter to the miners (I do not buy, only hodl)? To the exchanges (I do not trade, only hodl)?
According to your reasoning, by not trading (hodling the coin in cold storage), I effectively make myself irrelevant. Correct?

Hell no, holding is what gives it value.

Assuming anyone else wants to buy, they can only buy from miners which is a limited supply. Welcome moon.

If no one else wants to buy any sort of Bitcoin, then you're screwed. Same as would happen tomorrow if we woke up and no one wanted to buy Bitcoin without a fork. No guarantee that won't happen.

If you want guaranteed store of value, independent of what other people value, too fucking bad. About the best you can do is buy a chocolate bar, at least you can eat it.

Perhaps I'm not making myself clear.

You claim: "Whatever it is that the economic majority thinks is more important [will be implemented]."
I ask: Via what mechanism?
You reply: The market, dur!
I ask: What does that mean? I hold 5%, I don't trade it, what mechanisms are available to me to make my opinion count?
Sure, I can try to sell my hodlings, but only post factum. The "economic majority" is not the BTC long-term hodlers, but the*fiat hodlers*, those willing to *buy* BTC.
The miners aren't selling BTC to me, they're selling BTC to people with fiat, those are the opinions that matter, not mine (I'm not buying, remember?)
The interests of buyers != the interests of hodlers != interests of miners.

Those same participants (fiat buyers, BTC holders/speculators, miners, merchants, users, etc.) are there now, determining the value of the coins you hold.

All of those participants will be there later, determining the value of the coins you hold.

If you disagree with the economic majority (market consensus) then by definition you trade, and thereby your opinion matters. If you don't trade, then your opinion matches the market consensus.

I'm gonna try ELY5:

I own a house (my part of the economy), one of the many houses in Bitcoinia (the economy), which, in turn, is conveniently situated below a levee.
Mayoral election coming up. Mayor A wants to nuke the levee (is Socialist, presumably), mayor B doesn't (is Ron Paul).

I ask you: How do I vote for Ron Paul, I don't want to live with communists, underwater!
You reply: Vote with your wallet. If you don't like the Mayor who gets elected, sell the house.
I sputter:  Buh...but wouldn't that be too late? My underwater house won't be worth shit, because in a socialist town! I don't want to watch the elections and leave if the commies win, I want a voice. How do I vote? You said I could, because economic majority. But clearly you didn't mean me, I could only react, sell my house when it becomes aquatic.
You: The market will take care of it, invisible hand.

@oda.krell: feel free to field this.

Ok, so you say you want another mechanism for decision making, so that the decision process is proactive instead of responding to changes that have occurred.  The question is whether such a thing is possible without being very gameable (I have no clue).
But Smooth is completely right that holding affects the market, so you shouldn't debate him on that.



744. Post 13746760 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: Elwar on February 01, 2016, 08:30:01 PM

March 2015
Unless the exploit has been fixed, that doesn't change the fact that it is a security vulnerability. 
They don't say this will break bitcoin, just that it can be a portal to install malware.



745. Post 13746814 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 01, 2016, 09:33:33 PM
Unless the exploit has been fixed, that doesn't change the fact that it is a security vulnerability. 
They don't say this will break bitcoin, just that it can be a portal to install malware.

lol, no. nonoononono.
Did I misread?  Please correct me then. 



746. Post 13746878 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.42h):

Quote from: mb300sd on February 01, 2016, 09:39:24 PM
Scary...  http://www.coinfox.info/news/persons/1733-kaspersky-lab-researcher-creates-virus-that-can-spread-through-the-blockchain

March 2015
Unless the exploit has been fixed, that doesn't change the fact that it is a security vulnerability.  
They don't say this will break bitcoin, just that it can be a portal to install malware.

lol, no. nonoononono.
Did I misread?  Please correct me then.  

See comments. Not a real threat.

https://securelist.com/blog/research/69488/blockchain-technology-abuse-time-to-think-about-fixes/
What, it's not executable?  Then what the fuck are they writing about.  Jezus.  
EDIT: I thought they had found some ingenious way to make bitcoin software execute malware, turns out it is just some dipshit who wants media attention doing nothing at all.



747. Post 13785658 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: molecular on February 05, 2016, 03:19:34 PM
I'm generally ok with the speed of payment. I truly take issue with some properties of the Fiat money, though. Especially with the fact that banks can lend it into existence out of thin air. I can see why someone from a bank would downplay the fact that I am probably not alone.

I don't think of it so much as that they can create it out of thin air.  Rather, the deposits you hold at a bank are not real money, but a mix of loans, stock investments etc., with a small bit of cash reserves so they can pay out the few people who want some cash at any given time.



748. Post 13788924 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.43h):

Quote from: molecular on February 05, 2016, 09:32:42 PM
I'm generally ok with the speed of payment. I truly take issue with some properties of the Fiat money, though. Especially with the fact that banks can lend it into existence out of thin air. I can see why someone from a bank would downplay the fact that I am probably not alone.

I don't think of it so much as that they can create it out of thin air.  Rather, the deposits you hold at a bank are not real money, but a mix of loans, stock investments etc., with a small bit of cash reserves so they can pay out the few people who want some cash at any given time.

True. The smallest fraction of money is in the form of cash of course (the only form of legal tender in germany, for example). Banks are engaging in fractional reserve lending (no surprise). Point being: could they do it with bitcoin? Theoretically yes, if they can get everyone to deposit their bitcoins it could work just as well. Central bank would be replaced by bitcoin network. In practice it wouldn't work well at all though, because bitcoin is way easier (cheaper) to move / store / transact online than cash. It's digital cash.

Banks runs are just a mouse click away.

They can't let that happen so they'll divert the attention to "blockchain tech", do a little "embrace and extend" magic and hopefully be done with bitcoin.
I am reasonably sure that if bitcoin becomes widely used, fractional reserve banking would still be used quite a bit.  I don't think fractional reserve banking is pure evil, but rather problematic is that people perceive it as equivalent to cash (more like a vault) instead of a somewhat risky investment.  The fact that often governments insure these bank accounts (up to a certain sum) certainly helps this perception of it being 'risk-free' money.  And when people start thinking stuff is risk-free when it is not, things can turn ugly.

In a bitcoin world, I do think there would be less fractional banking because it's easier to 'be your own bank(vault)', in a quite secure way.  Adding to this, the average returns from investments (loans, stocks) might not be dramatically higher than bitcoin appreciation due to productivity gains and population growth, making non-bitcoin investment relatively less attractive (which would slow down economical growth somewhat, but also decrease malinvestment).

My 2 cents.



749. Post 13896208 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on February 15, 2016, 08:51:06 PM
where's trolfi these days?

he's hanging out on reddit surprisingly he's defending our beloved Bitcoin to the bitter end.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/45rqb3/heres_adam_back_stalling_master_hei_gavin_lets/czzykx4?context=3

No he's insulting Bitcoin and advocating GavinCoin
GavinCoin WTF is that, Gavin is the longest standing developer he's taking heat for personal attacks, the only questionable thing hes done is visit the CIA and the CFR, and that was to tell them how bitcoin worked.

You just need to look at what he's produced to know he's pro bitcoin.  

GavinCoin means squat, try looking for facts!

He's trying to make Bitcoin inflationary. He's a socialist. He's an enemy of Bitcoin.
I liked you better before.  You seem to have become very hostile and unnuanced. I mean like that comment  before about a block size increase being the same thing as lifting the 21M cap.  Come on dude.  Such nonsense ( and I am not against Core by the way, very grateful for the good work the devs do)



750. Post 13904797 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 16, 2016, 04:00:23 PM
... Hopefully we don't dip below ...
~85% chance within hour.
~90% chance within day.

Want to bet on that?  I ll give you 80 % chance and say within day it doesn't dip below 400 (finex).
If I win I get 200 USD worth of bitcoin, if you win you get 50 USD worth of bitcoin.



751. Post 13904902 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 16, 2016, 04:19:54 PM
... Hopefully we don't dip below ...
~85% chance within hour.
~90% chance within day.

Want to bet on that?  I ll give you 80 % chance and say within day it doesn't dip below 400 (finex).
If I win I get 200 USD worth of bitcoin, if you win you get 50 USD worth of bitcoin.

No. I don't bet/do business on Bitcointalk. Too much scamming Sad
Too bad, I guess it ll just be for bragging rights then :-)



752. Post 13916956 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 17, 2016, 09:36:31 AM

I miss lambie. He was a class act.

Well, maybe it's all relative.... Lambie was annoying as well, but you fatty seem to be suffering from false memory nastalgia.... hahahahaha

 Wink
Wtf are you guys talking about? Bargainbin and blunderer or whatever is NLC ,so he is still here (or am I losing it?)



753. Post 13916968 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.44h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on February 16, 2016, 04:22:32 PM
... Hopefully we don't dip below ...
~85% chance within hour.
~90% chance within day.

Want to bet on that?  I ll give you 80 % chance and say within day it doesn't dip below 400 (finex).
If I win I get 200 USD worth of bitcoin, if you win you get 50 USD worth of bitcoin.

No. I don't bet/do business on Bitcointalk. Too much scamming Sad
Too bad, I guess it ll just be for bragging rights then :-)
Bragging rights claimed  Grin



754. Post 13975100 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 22, 2016, 06:37:26 PM
What is SUPPOSED to happen according to economic theory is that as quantity of money creation decreases (halvings), velocity of money (transactions) is supposed to go up to compensate, maintaining the balance of MV=PQ.  This clearly cannot happen if scaling is slower than halvings.  

Sidechains, lighting network, etc are no substitute because they effectively trade Bitcon IOUs and not actual bitcoin. You get the same problem that the fiat world has: a fractional reserve money multiplier than can either run positive or negative and screw up the balance.  

Somebody please tell me the error of my thinking, or a slow liquidation becomes a serious consideration.  
Apart from some other concerns you raise, which I think have merit, I would like to respond to 2 things where I believe you to be wrong:

1) I don't know where you get the assumption that the halvings are supposed to have an effect on velocity of money.  

2) I think bitcoins paid through LN are economically the same as on-chain transactions.  Yes you could describe it as some kind of IOU, but it is mathematically/informatically based on the same bitcoins, these bitcoins are "anchored", so you should treat these like regular bitcoins. It's not the same thing as a paper IOU (or a digital one) where the only "link" is the trust you have in the issuer of the IOU.

EDIT: actually, maybe LN might have some effect on money velocity in the future, by allowing (especially by machines) much more and faster transactions.



755. Post 13976411 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: bargainbin on February 22, 2016, 07:33:05 PM
...
tl; dr; pure FUD every word is pure FUD.

Chillax; sexy human females are waiting for you and your bitcoins @ Xotika.TV

i can't i'm saving myself a big load to blow on my GF's face.

Saving. Delayed gratification. That's what good Libertarian secs is all about Smiley
That one deserves a big lol  Cheesy



756. Post 13976557 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 22, 2016, 08:45:42 PM
What is SUPPOSED to happen according to economic theory is that as quantity of money creation decreases (halvings), velocity of money (transactions) is supposed to go up to compensate, maintaining the balance of MV=PQ.  This clearly cannot happen if scaling is slower than halvings.  

Sidechains, lighting network, etc are no substitute because they effectively trade Bitcon IOUs and not actual bitcoin. You get the same problem that the fiat world has: a fractional reserve money multiplier than can either run positive or negative and screw up the balance.  

Somebody please tell me the error of my thinking, or a slow liquidation becomes a serious consideration.  
Apart from some other concerns you raise, which I think have merit, I would like to respond to 2 things where I believe you to be wrong:

1) I don't know where you get the assumption that the halvings are supposed to have an effect on velocity of money.  

2) I think bitcoins paid through LN are economically the same as on-chain transactions.  Yes you could describe it as some kind of IOU, but it is mathematically/informatically based on the same bitcoins, these bitcoins are "anchored", so you should treat these like regular bitcoins. It's not the same thing as a paper IOU (or a digital one) where the only "link" is the trust you have in the issuer of the IOU.

EDIT: actually, maybe LN might have some effect on money velocity in the future, by allowing (especially by machines) much more and faster transactions.

1) They don't effect the velocity (v). They effect the quantity (M).  So because MV=PQ, a decrease in M MUST be compensated by a proportional increase in V in order for the equation to balance out. If it doesn't, then either price or quantity (or both) on the other side must adjust.

2) yes, you could have some sort of "proof of burn" to prevent LN from operating as a fractional reserve and then you'd be right. Centralized third party actors could also have cryptographically proven 100% reserves (or less reserves, provided they honestly disclosed this). 

Adam is right. This is FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and doubt), but it is genuine fear, uncertainty and doubt.

Thanks, that does address at least one of my concerns.
1) I still don't understand why you want prices to stay the same in this equation (and of course as lambie pointed out, the amount of money doesn't decrease, the rate of new money created slows down).  
2)why would you need to burn the btc?  I think you need to read about LN some more (actually so do I about the technical details, but I think I have most of the big picture down).  You are trading "spending rights" for actual bitcoins that are locked in a special transaction.  If you start of with 10 btc, after the payment channel closes, there will still be 10 btc.  During the use of the channel, there is only ever 10 btc worth being exchanged.  How on earth does this  resemble fractional reserve banking?



757. Post 13979749 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 22, 2016, 10:48:20 PM
What is SUPPOSED to happen according to economic theory is that as quantity of money creation decreases (halvings), velocity of money (transactions) is supposed to go up to compensate, maintaining the balance of MV=PQ.  This clearly cannot happen if scaling is slower than halvings.  

Sidechains, lighting network, etc are no substitute because they effectively trade Bitcon IOUs and not actual bitcoin. You get the same problem that the fiat world has: a fractional reserve money multiplier than can either run positive or negative and screw up the balance.  

Somebody please tell me the error of my thinking, or a slow liquidation becomes a serious consideration.  
Apart from some other concerns you raise, which I think have merit, I would like to respond to 2 things where I believe you to be wrong:

1) I don't know where you get the assumption that the halvings are supposed to have an effect on velocity of money.  

2) I think bitcoins paid through LN are economically the same as on-chain transactions.  Yes you could describe it as some kind of IOU, but it is mathematically/informatically based on the same bitcoins, these bitcoins are "anchored", so you should treat these like regular bitcoins. It's not the same thing as a paper IOU (or a digital one) where the only "link" is the trust you have in the issuer of the IOU.

EDIT: actually, maybe LN might have some effect on money velocity in the future, by allowing (especially by machines) much more and faster transactions.

1) They don't effect the velocity (v). They effect the quantity (M).  So because MV=PQ, a decrease in M MUST be compensated by a proportional increase in V in order for the equation to balance out. If it doesn't, then either price or quantity (or both) on the other side must adjust.

2) yes, you could have some sort of "proof of burn" to prevent LN from operating as a fractional reserve and then you'd be right. Centralized third party actors could also have cryptographically proven 100% reserves (or less reserves, provided they honestly disclosed this).  

Adam is right. This is FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and doubt), but it is genuine fear, uncertainty and doubt.

Thanks, that does address at least one of my concerns.
1) I still don't understand why you want prices to stay the same in this equation (and of course as lambie pointed out, the amount of money doesn't decrease, the rate of new money created slows down).  
2)why would you need to burn the btc?  I think you need to read about LN some more (actually so do I about the technical details, but I think I have most of the big picture down).  You are trading "spending rights" for actual bitcoins that are locked in a special transaction.  If you start of with 10 btc, after the payment channel closes, there will still be 10 btc.  During the use of the channel, there is only ever 10 btc worth being exchanged.  How on earth does this  resemble fractional reserve banking?

1) I want the price of goods (P) to go down relative to Bitcoin so Bitcoin's purchasing power goes up. I want the Quantity of goods and services available to purchase (q) to go up, so taken together, I want the left side of the equation to equal the right side, which of course it logically has to.  

If the rate of quantity increase goes down, then the rate of velocity increase needs to go up.  Get that? we are beyond algebra and into calculus, but scaling can't be diminishing or even constant, but needs to be accelerating  for the equation to balance out and for price to continually go down while quantity goes up.  

2) you need 100% proof of reserves, so if you are exchanging tokens on one network for tokens on another network, you can't still have the original tokens or you have more than you started with (x+1>x) so you have a money multiplier.

and Yes, I don't know enough about the LN to discuss technical details. I'm only talking what it NEEDS to be in order to prevent effectively fractional reserve banking. Like I said, I could be making a mistake somewhere, so I am not arguing that LN is a bad idea. I just have questions.

I think I also need to clarify two things, in order to be absolutely innocent of trolling accusations.

A) I am in favor of the round table agreement- not because I like the terms. I absolutely do not like the terms as I believe the scaling is too slow for the reason I explained above. I am in favor of the agreement because I think it will either result in a change in leadership or rules within Core (which I think is sorely needed), or it will result in loss of support for Core by the miners and therefor a change in leadership of code development from Core to something else, probably Classic.

B) Here's my position on the miners: More hashpower is not only good, but absolutely necessary in order for Bitcoin to maintain it's first mover advantage over competing coins or potentially competing coins.  There is a huge danger in mining being concentrated in China as it creates a POSSIBLE central point of failure if there is (another) Chinese crackdown.  So if we can't get rid of the miners and miners are concentrated in China, what is there to do to reacquire censorship resistance? Only one thing: Increase hashpower outside of China massively, and at a rate substantially faster than hashpower within China is growing. I have no idea how we are going to do that given China's cheaper electricity and labor.


1)  I don't get your reasoning.
2) LN uses the blockchain as it's proof of reserve.  No other proof is therefore needed.



758. Post 13982748 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: sAt0sHiFanClub on February 23, 2016, 12:55:32 PM
it just some more FUD you are spreading like "the LN routing problem" bull made up shit stories. Just stop it if you don't know what you're talking about.

Not according to this post ( point #4)

Quote
I asked why not since it seems to be the main savior for the capacity wars.
 Answer - more needs to be done before LN is viable.


Is there some good up-to-date source (without being super technical) to read about LN issues/challenges ?



759. Post 13982847 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 23, 2016, 01:28:57 PM
it just some more FUD you are spreading like "the LN routing problem" bull made up shit stories. Just stop it if you don't know what you're talking about.

Not according to this post ( point #4)

Quote
I asked why not since it seems to be the main savior for the capacity wars.
 Answer - more needs to be done before LN is viable.


Is there some good up-to-date source (without being super technical) to read about LN issues/challenges ?

Bahahahahaha, good luck with that.
Probably similar to "explain quantum physics to me in 30 seconds, no big words and be complete"  Wink



760. Post 14006336 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.45h):

Quote from: 8up on February 25, 2016, 01:56:00 PM
Just curious. Who of you is hedged in ETH?

Quote
[X] yes
[ ] no
[ ] no, but plan to
So because of current scaling issues, people will go to a currency that scales even worse?  No thanks, I ll pass on the hopium.



761. Post 14017638 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.46h):

Quote from: Tzupy on February 26, 2016, 02:26:19 PM
Blocks are full again. I think this will now probably happen any time the market tries to pump.

I don't see much upside but there's a lot of potential downside.


The bulls have a couple of days to break resistance at 450$. If they fail, there will be a lot of panicky downtrend.
Or not



762. Post 14115879 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

50 minutes since last block sucks if you are waiting for a transaction  Angry



763. Post 14116055 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.47h):

Quote from: hdbuck on March 06, 2016, 04:03:47 PM
50 minutes since last block sucks if you are waiting for a transaction  Angry

hodlers still not affected tho
What the fuck has sending a transaction got to do with holding BTC or not?



764. Post 14403061 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: r0ach on April 02, 2016, 04:29:39 AM
being fully honest, i have simply dont understand what your saying, maybe my view is too high level. to me you either prove you computing power  (POW) or you prove your economic power ( POS)

i think we'd need a face to face discussion with a blackboard to understand your point.

Do you understand that the act of mining itself is technically a decentralized exchange?  Most people don't know Bitcoin has a decentralized exchange, but that's exactly what it is.  It's a permanent decentralized exchange because the block reward is subsidized by transaction fees so you can always go straight to the tree itself to pluck off coins.  If you remove this peg, it becomes a closed entropy system and is no longer decentralized, but only a distributed, permissioned ledger.
Bullshit, an exchange is a place you can buy and sell stuff.  You can't sell bitcoins by mining.
Mining is a way of obtaining bitcoin that doesn't require authentication, but that's about it.....  



765. Post 14417220 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 03, 2016, 09:07:20 PM


No. Evolution has stopped in humans. It basically stopped with regards to potential intelligence before we left Africa. So the point I am making is that there is no genetic reason for discriminating on the basis of ethnicity or "race". We all know this. There is no reason to feel sorry for Kofi Annan or Ban Ki-Moon (or Freddy Mercury for that matter). They haven't been dealt inferior genes. It's not a thing. They're far "better" humans in their field than anyone on this forum.

LOL!  Have hereditary traits stopped producing varying survival and reproduction advantages?  Of course not.  Five minutes in any single's bar will tell you that.

Obviously you are correct that there's no such thing as "inferior" genes in any absolute sense, but there never was. There are only genes better or more poorly suited for their environment.  But as you just noted yourself, those environments differ and because of that, there are obviously selection pressures that continue to produce dominant genotypes  that vary by environment. That is natural selection, and it's very mush alive and well. More alive than ever, I'd say.
This 100%



766. Post 14418872 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Fatman3001 on April 04, 2016, 07:25:27 AM


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkuCtIko798


So evolution is ongoing but 'gross' evolution isn't?   What does that even mean?  Sounds nonsensical to me.



767. Post 14420057 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: Laosai on April 04, 2016, 12:03:41 PM
Yup.


This is why women were never allowed in the political process for thousands of years.  Each one in the picture is basically just a large, naive child, but women never actually grow out of this.  They could be 16 or 30, it doesn't matter.  You may as well allow 10 year olds to vote and witness the devastation that occurs afterwards.

Those bitches who want to actually have some rights. It's not because they're 50% of the population that they should have any right to speak up.
By now we should all acknowledge the inevitable truth: whatever race, gender, country, layer of society, political party, education or shape of ears rOach has is obviously far superior to that of all the rest.  As such, it is finally proven that he is not a frustrated individual but in fact an Ubermensch.



768. Post 14455095 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Saw this link on /r/bitcoin, interesting stuff.

http://meaningness.com/metablog/geeks-mops-sociopaths



769. Post 14455237 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: blunderer on April 07, 2016, 01:01:58 PM
Saw this link on /r/bitcoin, interesting stuff.

http://meaningness.com/metablog/geeks-mops-sociopaths

I hate agreeing with stuff from the interweb Angry

Gee, I wonder where you fit in  Grin



770. Post 14490280 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on April 07, 2016, 10:28:44 PM
Saw this link on /r/bitcoin, interesting stuff.

http://meaningness.com/metablog/geeks-mops-sociopaths

Completely irrelevent for Bitcoin though, since the entire purpose of a currency is to become a monopoly, a consensus mechanism for exchange.  The less of a monopoly it has, the less useful it is.  Your link argues popularity weakens the idea, so the article is inverse to how Bitcoin actually works.  Don't try and conflate grunge music and economics.  People like money to be as boring and predictable as possible, not "cool".  Just like when you open your refrigerator, you don't want to have to guess what's edible or not.  That's definitely not cool.

I agree, but it definitely has some relevance to the 'hipster' vibe surrounding 'blockchain technology' in finance (in as much as they can be hipster) and the same in fintech, VC funded start-ups surrounding bitcoin.
Yeah, the fact that bitcoin is an economic thing with utility and economic incentives attached make this a different beast than the coolness of a subculture, but it is funny to see that a lot of the social dynamics are similar.



771. Post 14492577 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.48h):

Quote from: yefi on April 10, 2016, 06:56:27 PM
* yefi prods Bitcoin with a stick
Looks like you are going to need a bigger stick, or give it some more time to wake up...



772. Post 14509132 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: solitude on April 12, 2016, 07:40:36 AM
I hope Trump wins.

I was at der Führer's rally tonight! absolutely nuts! 20,000+ people going apeshit for the god-emperor !!  He turned away 5,000+ poeple because there simply wasn't enough room in the venue!!

Fuckin' see my post here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1428863.msg14507623#msg14507623

Nothing like a decisive strong leader to get your country out of economic woes.




773. Post 14511396 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Back on topic: rocket is feeling a bit sluggish, but I am quite bullish.  Might take off today, might take another year, but I estimate the odds of going below 300 again to be quite low.  Mars awaits. 



774. Post 14641009 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

I like the look of the price chart but not of the leverage numbers.  Expecting a small pullback this weekend.



775. Post 14682584 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: BitUsher on April 27, 2016, 01:14:39 PM
Yeah! My buy limit orders went through , time to wire more fiat for another round of buys. These shakeouts don't scare veterans who have been riding the rollercoaster for some time, just another buying opportunity.
My guess is we'll see a second round of dumping, and since I am not going to act on this suspicion, it is bound to become reality.



776. Post 14683908 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.49h):

Quote from: BitUsher on April 27, 2016, 01:26:34 PM
Yeah! My buy limit orders went through , time to wire more fiat for another round of buys. These shakeouts don't scare veterans who have been riding the rollercoaster for some time, just another buying opportunity.
My guess is we'll see a second round of dumping, and since I am not going to act on this suspicion, it is bound to become reality.

I don't need to waste any calories guessing. The beauty about a long term perspective is you don't concern yourself with the daily ups and downs, you don't get emotional, simply load in more fiat and set the buy limit for 2-5% below current price and wait for the next shakeout. Rinse and repeat. Smart investors will be doing this aggressively for anything below 1200 USD... It is all dirt cheap now!

Why do it the easy way when you can torture yourself?



777. Post 14807515 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: TERA on May 10, 2016, 03:29:16 AM
Wow that looks like a really good chart right? Looks like the price has been 'breaking out' for over a month as it nudges closer and closer against resistance. Sentiments have been tremendously universally bullish for months as bitcoin makes headlines all over the news and the chart looks just like 2012 right before the 2012 halving. Every thread on the forum is positive and predicts the level of the next rise. Meanwhile, CHINA is still the market leader. What could go wrong, right? The BFX order book bids are paper thin and BFX longs are maxxed out at 32M. Each time this margin level was reached in the past was when bulls were buying in to what looked like a big breakout (such as in July 2014) but inflected into the next decline instead. I'd say there is a distinctive chance of another decline to the 300s before any meaningful rise. I'm not betting anything on that though.


EDIT: I should say that I still give more chance to us breaking out versus trading back in the 300-500 channel, but the things listed above are indeed giving me doubts.



778. Post 14841740 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

I know this isn't really the place for it, but can anybody explain this DAO thing to me in simple terms?  I feel like the odds of it being a technobabble hype to obfuscate things (a lousy investment) are too high for me to put in the effort to figure it out.  But I could be wrong.  If the subject is deemed too off-topic, I ll delete this post.



779. Post 14842170 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.50h):

Quote from: Andre# on May 13, 2016, 10:33:02 PM
I know this isn't really the place for it, but can anybody explain this DAO thing to me in simple terms?  I feel like the odds of it being a technobabble hype to obfuscate things (a lousy investment) are too high for me to put in the effort to figure it out.  But I could be wrong.  If the subject is deemed too off-topic, I ll delete this post.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4h4xbt/the_dao_eli5_thought_i_would_share/
Quote from: mymenace on May 13, 2016, 09:46:14 PM
I know this isn't really the place for it, but can anybody explain this DAO thing to me in simple terms?  I feel like the odds of it being a technobabble hype to obfuscate things (a lousy investment) are too high for me to put in the effort to figure it out.  But I could be wrong.  If the subject is deemed too off-topic, I ll delete this post.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=428589.0;topicseen

put your question on this thread, better chance of an answer your looking for, i hope


this might help too

https://daowiki.atlassian.net/wiki/


Thanks for the replies.



780. Post 15003155 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Fuck me, I have been waiting so long for a breakout, even took a big leveraged long a while ago, but just after you close it, this stuff happens...



781. Post 15012949 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on May 29, 2016, 07:28:16 PM
anyone need this too?



Busted your hand hitting a wall?

EDIT: or is it something to stop you from being on the pc?



782. Post 15047620 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: clopoterian on June 01, 2016, 01:44:21 PM
Chooing ahead slowly but surely


What's it like, having to lie all the time? (original below)


If you look at the inclination of the people, it is clear that the train is heading upwards, but less so than in the first post.  Quite a good analogy for bitcoin I would say, heading up, but slower than the fans expect/ would like.



783. Post 15047880 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Quote from: 600watt on June 01, 2016, 05:26:04 PM
pls, everyone, do not quote trolls.
Apologies



784. Post 15077085 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.51h):

Dr. Strangeprice, or how I stopped worrying about the leverage and love the rocket.



785. Post 15103652 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: BitUsher on June 06, 2016, 01:59:54 PM
Segwit RC soon to be deployed -

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8149

Get ready for a price boost when Segwit comes out of RC unscathed and miners start accepting it bring to an end one chapter of this drama and sending bitcoin in the right direction for scaling.

Thanks for the update



786. Post 15109842 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 07, 2016, 03:26:15 AM
http://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/65/
Quote
The price of any commodity tends to gravitate toward the production cost.  If the price is below cost, then production slows down.  If the price is above cost, profit can be made by generating and selling more.  At the same time, the increased production would increase the difficulty, pushing the cost of generating towards the price.

In later years, when new coin generation is a small percentage of the existing supply, market price will dictate the cost of production more than the other way around.

At the moment, generation effort is rapidly increasing, suggesting people are estimating the present value to be higher than the current cost of production.

... does that spell it out clearly enough for you?
Doesn't the fact that supply is fixed suggest that production cost follows the price?



787. Post 15112146 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 07, 2016, 09:46:35 AM
http://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/65/
Quote
The price of any commodity tends to gravitate toward the production cost.  If the price is below cost, then production slows down.  If the price is above cost, profit can be made by generating and selling more.  At the same time, the increased production would increase the difficulty, pushing the cost of generating towards the price.

In later years, when new coin generation is a small percentage of the existing supply, market price will dictate the cost of production more than the other way around.

At the moment, generation effort is rapidly increasing, suggesting people are estimating the present value to be higher than the current cost of production.

... does that spell it out clearly enough for you?
Doesn't the fact that supply is fixed suggest that production cost follows the price?

... therein lies the magic, difficulty ratchets up cost and price ratchets up difficulty ... it's a virtuous circle from which the counterfeiters cannot escape.
Yes, but nothing ratches up price, so it is the driving factor, no?



788. Post 15113677 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 07, 2016, 10:48:53 AM
http://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/65/
Quote
The price of any commodity tends to gravitate toward the production cost.  If the price is below cost, then production slows down.  If the price is above cost, profit can be made by generating and selling more.  At the same time, the increased production would increase the difficulty, pushing the cost of generating towards the price.

In later years, when new coin generation is a small percentage of the existing supply, market price will dictate the cost of production more than the other way around.

At the moment, generation effort is rapidly increasing, suggesting people are estimating the present value to be higher than the current cost of production.

... does that spell it out clearly enough for you?
Doesn't the fact that supply is fixed suggest that production cost follows the price?

... therein lies the magic, difficulty ratchets up cost and price ratchets up difficulty ... it's a virtuous circle from which the counterfeiters cannot escape.
Yes, but nothing ratches up price, so it is the driving factor, no?

... utility, expectation and speculation all ratchet up price at different times.
Yes, but we were discussing the relationship between price and production costs.



789. Post 15125607 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on June 08, 2016, 10:23:05 AM
I guess you cant read so I'll repeat it for you:

cost of production forms a soft lower bound for price, an 'elastic' floor if you will.

Cost of production is related to difficulty but not directly or in a definite proportional relation since it is complicated by many other factors like cost of rig development, software development and operational labour overheads, electricity, etc. So now I've opened it up to the total complexity (that really just complicates with enlightening) this is the bit where you try to wriggle out and lead the conversation into the weeds, minutiae, thread-trashing and scatological references to obfuscate the central premise that doesn't fit your permabear, anti-bitcoin case.
I am wildly bullish, but your statements don't seem logical to me.
There is nothing theoretically preventing the price from dropping and miners going bankrupt, inducing lower difficulty.   
I am not saying that is what I expect to happen in the near future, just that it can happen.

Please try reasoning with arguments instead of resorting to aggressive end statements.



790. Post 15125823 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: becoin on June 08, 2016, 11:00:36 AM
There is nothing theoretically preventing the price from dropping and miners going bankrupt, inducing lower difficulty.  
Theoretically everything is possible but not always!
I think this has actually happened before for brief periods.

Anyways, looks like we are heading up again.  Go BTC  Grin



791. Post 15125910 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: DaRude on June 08, 2016, 11:11:43 AM
There is nothing theoretically preventing the price from dropping and miners going bankrupt, inducing lower difficulty.  
Theoretically everything is possible but not always!
I think this has actually happened before for brief periods.

Anyways, looks like we are heading up again.  Go BTC  Grin

Reassuring to see a little nibble but will need lots more, still BTC15k are stacked till $650 on Finex someone cashing in big time
Eventually the movement of the ocean will erode even the strongest walls  Wink



EDIT: It would be comforting to see BTC shorts a bit higher though.



792. Post 15125988 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: DaRude on June 08, 2016, 11:19:58 AM
..and longs a LOT lower. But it'll probably only go higher as speculation peaks before the halvening, hope a lot of those longs are in etherpoop too
True, but I doubt most are in etherpoop.  The thing is, most of the time big long positions are a recipe for disaster, which is why I was reluctant to jump into the breakout at first, but if speculators can correctly predict an influx of new money, then we are A-OK, and I think this has been happening.  People who were interested in bitcoin before, and have been following it a bit are deciding they don't want to miss the train, and jumping on.  The real bubble starts when we reach the people who haven't seriously considered investing yet.



793. Post 15126169 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: DaRude on June 08, 2016, 11:27:05 AM
..and longs a LOT lower. But it'll probably only go higher as speculation peaks before the halvening, hope a lot of those longs are in etherpoop too
True, but I doubt most are in etherpoop.  The thing is, most of the time big long positions are a recipe for disaster, which is why I was reluctant to jump into the breakout at first, but if speculators can correctly predict an influx of new money, then we are A-OK, and I think this has been happening.  People who were interested in bitcoin before, and have been following it a bit are deciding they don't want to miss the train, and jumping on.  The real bubble starts when we reach the people who haven't seriously considered investing yet.

The bull in me agrees, think(hope?) market is underestimating the effects and coverage of the halvening, expecting some wild swings during this month

Kinda scared me when longs went full retard and ate up all the swaps causing the daily rate on finex to jump to  above 0.5%. If it'd held that would squeeze a lot of them
I think upcoming scalability improvements, the end of previous bubble deflating and the worst of the "bitcoin civil war" being over are also positive price factors. Could still be a bumpy ride though  Smiley .



794. Post 15133212 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 08, 2016, 10:48:23 PM
583. Buy high sell at 32,000 in < 2 years  Grin
Adam, you are the only guy who I think is being ambiguous when he says "buy high" ...



795. Post 15135727 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: AZwarel on June 09, 2016, 01:26:34 AM
What is ETH actually for? What's so good about it?

I no nothing about it apart from its premined right? And there is no cap.

What are the good points?

It can do everything that bitcoin can, plus can scale and do stuff that bitcoiners used to talk about, like smart contracts.
Oh, did I mention it's not a SHA256 coin, meaning it's not controlled by the Chinese exchange/mining cartel?

But, to be honest, that's just a backstory too, like people totally using BTC because it's simpler than using a CC. In truth, it's just a really profitable coin with good volume Smiley

Mind to give a proof about eth can scale ?

Bitcoin is a supersecure blockchain, other thinks can be bulid on top of it, e.g. rootstock or lightning .  No need for fancy feutures. Just a good secure protocol.

And if bitcoin enters the next hyper bubble the red candle in your eth chart will be EPIC.

Well, the basic idea was, to make a decentralized network computer executing smart-contracts (not especially for a currency function, more like automated "transactions", colour tokens (like open company shares), crowdfunding (like this DAO monstrosity:)), where ether is the "fuel" to run the scripts. So it is highly different from the Bitcoin network in regard of its purpose.

But, there are problems with this idea. Both technical and social:

1. it uses a Turing-complete scripting language, so it can create infinite loops - this is supposed to be negated by using ether for every processing cycle, but still can jam up the network for awhile in theory, it is an attack vector;

2. the problem of scaling: it can not, because, every script (smart contract) must be run by every node, or the network spilt, so it can get much-much-much more hardware heavy than processing a ~300 bytes bitcoin tx.
Also, the ORDERING is different (and uncontrollable) for different nodes - because how data propagates on a network, which can totally fukup the whole idea of interdependent contracting aka: the order how script I. or script II. occupies/operates in the next block can be paramount, if scI depends on the execution of scII., and they get implemented in a different time order, they crush (fail to run, since the dependency is behind the execution order for every node downloading the new block with executable scripts -"transactions").
In short, the interblock ordering of "transactions" are not necessarily interchangeable, while in bitcoin, they are! That is a key technical unavoidable difference. The proposed solution, to split the nodes to process different executable is against the basic idea, and creates more profound problems...

3. strictly speaking, Ethereum has no (yet) known enforceable, algorithmic monetary policy (we do not know if it is fixed at what number or what is the inflation rate if not, how exactly will it transform into the PoS consensus, also, PoS can not work on the long run, because it has too many attack vectors, especially with a script running environment). Also, pre-mined -huge red flag -, which means very strong centralization, and direct control over the protocol in few hands (remember, no anonym PoW random nonce mining took place, because, premining!!!).

In bitcoin, after and since the genesis block, anyone can see the unchangeable monetary policy: 21mil coins, reward drop after every 210,000 blocks, PoW consensus.

4. those who were studying the DAO made it obvious - even before the shameful "IPO" ended -, that you can not use the same token directly for financing actual projects, while the investor's tokens are both committed (frozen), and an external force (the market price of ETH) can interfere with those project's financial plans. (If the DAO commits say, 100k ether to a project, which is supposed to worth $100k, but suddenly ETH drops 10%, they won't be able to pay the contractors, and they already committed, and can not change their "votes", while can not have enough $ - unless the contractor takes ETH, but than he faces the same problem - DAO could work, IF crypto would only be the de facto world currency, but only than).

5. Assmaster, i disagree. Bitcoin is scaling, BECAUSE it is a dumb network (LN for example). Just like Ethernet, or tcp/ip, they are dumb, but additional layers can use the easy, secure, simple basis of it. Ethereum is too complicated in itself to be layered on, forces way too complicated and self-conflicting goals to nodes, and never actually was designed to be a currency (it is a script running network platform, not designed to be an immutable, decentralized trust network with several exahash/s security power).

Thanks for the interesting write-up.
BTW, I can't help but find it comical that at the bottom of a detailed analysis, someone sincerely addresses another party as "assmaster".   Cheesy Long live the internet !



796. Post 15143580 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on June 09, 2016, 03:24:28 PM
Good morning Bitcoinland.

Still battling over $580 I see.

Coiling for the next big leg up, presumably. Past $610 this time?
Hope so, don't know to what degree the bank holidays on BFX will affect price in the short term.



797. Post 15169030 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Yeehaw  Grin



798. Post 15169126 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

614.23 BFX, rocket going fast



799. Post 15169152 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: toknormal on June 11, 2016, 11:52:45 PM

Need a few regular corrections so it doesn't get too overheated.


Taking a breather here would indeed be normal (but we could just as well rocket away some more)



800. Post 15169259 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: ImI on June 12, 2016, 12:07:24 AM

remember that asshole?  Grin


somebody post a laughing tinkerbell ...



801. Post 15174055 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

644 hellz yeah  Grin



802. Post 15174738 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: BitUsher on June 12, 2016, 11:51:06 AM
This is a bit too volatile , and unhealthy growth. I hate to see what will happen with mainstream adoption... shudders...

Still very little news and press coverage outside of our circles -

https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin&date=today%201-m&cmpt=date&tz=Etc%2FGMT%2B6

Very few mainstream interest. We are still obscure and are seeing a very small percentage of 1.4 billion Chinese shore up the price due to increased need for capital flight.

When we pass 1100 USD , and the press starts covering this expect much higher volatility.
Always a good sign when bulls worry about the price increasing too fast  Cool



803. Post 15181846 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Stores worldwide are running out of popcorn...



804. Post 15182013 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: spooderman on June 12, 2016, 10:27:51 PM

are there really that many people who see it sitting at 250 for like 18 months who suddenly decide to buy when it's 600+?
Absolutely, these are the people buying in now.



805. Post 15182500 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):




806. Post 15185291 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Holy f*cknuggets, she keeps on going...  Shocked



807. Post 15186816 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: MAGA on June 13, 2016, 07:48:32 AM
Having a dayjob with reporting MAGA being a racist, offensive, spamming fuck.

OT look, its up Smiley

go back to reddit cuck boy
Somebody ban this guy already



808. Post 15194759 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: toknormal on June 13, 2016, 05:42:42 PM

Smart money get out of bitcoin from time to time. But they don't get in fiat. They get in gold. That's why they are smart money.

I'd say the dumb money is in gold. If you want to be standing with your pants around your ankles in ten years time then invest in gold.

Here's the problem:

Over the last few millennia, gold gained value due to its monetary properties more than anything. In particular, those of limited supply, fungibility and mobility because coins could be transported anywhere in the age of physical markets and exchanged directly - peer to peer - just as bitcoin is.

Gold traders can choose which of these two media they prefer to trade - you can have either mobility or possession but you can't have both.

Because of this "forking" of the market, gold will never again command the kind of values or be able to support the same kind of "safe haven" investment that it did during the last few centuries. It is handicapped permanently and pegged at a value which represents the balance of demand between the physical and paper markets.

Cryptocurrencies, on the other hand, remedy the problem since they are the perfect "bearer instrument". One with which you can take both ownership and possession in the same trade and for that reason are likely to outperform precious metals by several orders of magnitude over the next few years.
Agreed, I still have a bit of gold from before, but I don't expect much from it (I even expect it to devalue quite a bit in purchasing power), it's just a monetary hedge for the case crypto should fail for some reason, a situation I am considering to be less and less likely.



809. Post 15195384 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Expecting a drop here



810. Post 15211832 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

I think we might see a second drop tomorrow.



811. Post 15211980 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Fakhoury on June 14, 2016, 09:40:53 PM
I think we might see a second drop tomorrow.

Why ?
We went up really fast, and this correction was quite mild.  Leverage longs are still quite high. I might be wrong though.



812. Post 15223930 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 15, 2016, 05:30:00 PM

Oh, and when I found it at .50 (cents), I couldn't find a place to buy some.  Cry  eheheh
Memory lane...

What were your options around then? I thought there was always the OTC channel and the new liberty standard place. Maybe it was gone by then. I dunno.

I should preface that by saying I hadn't yet read the white paper. I was going off intuition to be honest. I was not into Crytpo before that (just trading and computer work).
So, I did a few searches and it just seemed like a lot of work, wasn't sure about wiring money to GOX.
And then the price was at $1 and I thought "How can a digital money be equal to a dollar?" LOL
So, my ignorance "cost" me but that white paper made a light go off in my head.

Before that moment I was a relatively early internet employee during the bubble. At that time I saw the internet as a big old Black Swann.
When I came across that white paper, I saw it as a Black Swann on steroids.

Its about sharing
Seems quite often that when people encounter bitcoin for the first time, they think it sounds too good to be true, and they come up with a reason why it won't work.  A few years later, when they encounter it again, they are more likely to go for it.  That promises for the next bubble given the widespread media coverage in 2013  Grin.  

I am still bearish for the very short term (next day or 2) though.



813. Post 15224074 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 15, 2016, 05:46:52 PM
Yeah, Black Swan's are hard to spot. The internet might have been a lot easier to see. I mean the internet was freedom of information and Bitcoin is a step in the direction of freedom with value transfer. It isn't THE answer, but a step in the right direction.

If we see $10,000 per BTC this year, I would not at all be shocked.

The strange thing is, due to my background in computer science, I get to talk to quite a few relatively intelligent IT guys. 95% of them just don't get it. They understand tech but they can't wrap their heads around it. Trading stocks gave me another perspective and I find that stock traders might take a chance on BTC for obvious reasons, but understanding it is not one of them.

And these same people who wouldn't buy at $200 because it was too high, won't buy at $10,000 just like they won't buy now. It is almost like there is a stop sign in that part of the brain.
Yeah, not that many people that like new technologies and have an understanding of the money system.  Plus, people hang on to what is "normal" to them.  Luckily, the longer bitcoin exists and is mentioned in the news or by relatives, the more "normal" it will become for them.



814. Post 15224260 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: toknormal on June 15, 2016, 05:59:07 PM

I just can't see it NOT being a FIAT vacuum cleaner.

Don't worry, I don't think Bitcoin will ever be a "fiat vacum cleaner". Think of it this way....

There are 2 general types of "money" needed by advanced economies. 1 type that keeps prices stable (for trading) and one type that keeps the supply fixed (for store of value). The one that keeps prices stable is simply a way to denominate trades - it isn't actually "money" in the sense of being a bearer token like commodities, precious metals or cryptocurrencies. On many websites now you can even choose how to denominate your trade - Canadian Dollars, $USD, EUR, whatever.

Those trading currencies need to have a variable supply - like the USD. A fractional reserve system which inflates and contracts according to liquidity requirements. If you don't have that and use a fixed supply currency like Bitcoin for trading then half the businesses in the world will go bust and the other half will make supernormal profits which are not sustainable.

So I don't see bitcoin ever being used as a trading currency en masse. (You don't see prices ever being denominated in gold and neither did we when there was a gold standard). Bitcoin is a base asset which can be used to "back" trading currencies for example or facilitate the capitalisation of whatever markets, but I think prices will still continue to be denominated in prevailing regional currencies.
Why would someone buy USD when BTC is ubiquitously used in the future, because they want their currency to depreciate to gain stability?  That makes no sense.  Bitcoin will be stable (non-volatile) enough for commerce.



815. Post 15225505 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: 600watt on June 15, 2016, 07:19:09 PM

Seems quite often that when people encounter bitcoin for the first time, they think it sounds too good to be true, and they come up with a reason why it won't work.  A few years later, when they encounter it again, they are more likely to go for it.  That promises for the next bubble given the widespread media coverage in 2013  Grin.  

I am still bearish for the very short term (next day or 2) though.

i read about bitcoin in a news magazine in feb/march 2011. no IT knowledge at all. i decided to invest $3000, price was around $10. boy, it was hard for me to find out how to set up an account @mtgox and how to wire money to japan. the money took ages to get there while price was rising every day. the day it arrived on my account was the day of the peak bubble. instead of buying 300 btc i could only get 120. i hesitated. price climbed like a rocket. so i bought 100 btc.

aaaaand… price stopped to climb. bubble popped. it went down for the rest of the year all the way down to $2. i had managed to lose $2800 on some japanese online scam. mtgox was hacked while the the price went down, i could“t access my btc. decided to throw my account details/password into the garbage and felt so ashamed that i told no one about it and forgot all about it for years.

it wasn“t until march 2013 when some customer walked into my store and talked about bitcoin. didn“t even rang a bell. when he mentioned mtgox i remembered this tokyo based online scam and told to him to shut up talking about this fuck-up. the customer insisted it wasn“t a scam. i googled it. he was right, mtgox was still around. price was around $68 WAIT…WHAT??  i felt even worse, having no memory whatsoever about account access.

the guy suggested to write to mtgox customer service. i did. fuckin 10 minutes later they granted me access to my account, 100 btc sitting there untouched for 2 years. i got hooked on bitcoin that moment.  Smiley

Nice story.
I heard about bitcoin when it was 30 cents on a gold blog.   I figured it would be amazing if it would work, but then I thought"people will create clones, thereby cancelling the scarcity".  I thought about throwing 100 bucks at it, but ended up not doing it.  the price chart looked bubbly, and it would probably not end up working anyway. Never look at any decent info or a whitepaper.  I watched this YouTube video of rawdog, THAT buffoon was my source.... I mean I can't even.....   Wish I had bought then, but of course you never know what might have happened (could have lost all on scam exchange or whatever)



816. Post 15226905 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: toknormal on June 15, 2016, 06:15:46 PM

Why would someone buy USD when BTC is ubiquitously used in the future, because they want their currency to depreciate to gain stability?  That makes no sense

It does make sense. They would buy USD because they need it to faciliate trade of goods and services which are denominated in that currency. It doesn't depreciate fast enough to inhibit its use for trade. Any longer term holdings are invested so they don't lose value. Thats just how the world works - look back in history of 100 years. The $USD has depreciated massively - about 98% or something, yet it didn't inhibit the most monumental period of growth the world has seen in its existence.

It's right that fiat currencies should depreciate in value over time because their primary purpose is to facilitate trade and keep prices stable, not to store value (in the long term that is, obviously they need to be stable enough to store value in the short term).

Bitcoin will be stable (non-volatile) enough for commerce.

It won't be. It's academic. No fixed supply currency can be unless you have an economy that doesn't expand or contract in size. Also, if it was stable it wouldnt be doing its job. Many commentators criticise bitcoin for its volatility but it's that very volatility which indicates that it's successfully reflecting the balance of supply and demand for liquidity.

I'll admit that you seem to know more about modern economics than I do, but I disagree with you.
The reason gold isn't used as a transaction medium is because it is too damn inconvenient compared to fiat, so people are willing to hold a slowly depreciating currency because it was more convenient than gold.  In a bitcoin world, bitcoin would be just as convenient to transact with as fiat, so there is no incentive for the individual not to hold all his money in bitcoin.  Neither do businesses have a reason to ask to be paid in a depreciating currency.  In a world where bitcoin would be the only currency, it would not be volatile but slowly gain in value equal to productivity increase + percentage of coins lost per year, lets call it 3 percent per year.  Any business model that has a profit below that percentage (compared to btc value of the previous year) would not be executed due to opportunity cost (better to stay in btc then).  Might not be ideal for economic growth, but I fail to see why people would act differently. You seem to reason from the economic systems perspective, but it is people and their decisions that make up the economy.



817. Post 15230734 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Looks like I was wrong about the second dip.



818. Post 15235265 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):


Quote from: MySecondCunt on June 16, 2016, 12:39:14 PM
> sovereign and corporate and private debt levels are sane
You don't understand what debt is. It's not a bad thing you imagine it to be.
If you owe me money, for instance, I'd be much less likely to rob or kill you. Because then you'll never pay me back.

So following the same logic, if you loan me money, I am more likely to kill you because then I won't have to pay you back? 



819. Post 15243253 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: spooderman on June 16, 2016, 09:53:05 PM
why is there such low volume on bitstamp? is there any controversy surrounding the exchange? i used to hold it in the highest regard.
I am guessing you are looking at USD trades.  They opened up EUR trades a while ago, before that SEPA deposits were automatically converted to USD.



820. Post 15248990 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Hunyadi on June 17, 2016, 09:29:41 AM
https://thedao.slack.com/archives/general/p1466150717002913

griff [10:05 AM]
@channel The DAO is being attacked. It has been going on for 3-4 hours, it is draining ETH at a rapid rate. This is not a drill.

You can help:

    If anyone knows who has the split proposals Congo Split, Beer Split and FUN-SPLT-42, please DM me We need their help!

    If you want to help, you can vote yes on those aforementioned split proposals. especially people who’s tokens are blocked because they voted for Prop 43 (the music app one).

    We need to spam the Network so that we can mount a counter attack all the brightest minds in the Ethereum world are in on this.

please use this: for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { eth.sendTransaction({from: eth.accounts[4], gas: 2300000, gasPrice: web3.toWei(20, 'shannon'), data: '0x5b620186a05a131560135760016020526000565b600080601f600039601f565b6000f3'}) }


oh dear ... couldn't see that one coming.

Guess we'll get to see what a half-baked $160 million smart contract blow-up looks like. Hope Vitalik has good liability insurance.

Keep it simple with tried and true, dumb smart money is sometimes better on the bleeding edge.

How do you think this affects BTC? I guess this makes crypto look bad.
Probably it slows adoption, but honestly, shit has happened in crypto before, and it hasn't stopped people in the end.



821. Post 15254795 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Anyone else having issues reaching Poloniex?



822. Post 15290857 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 20, 2016, 08:53:04 AM
The auction already started at 12:00AM this morning Australia time. So any money needed is already out of the market.
True, but they could still 'arbitrage' if the auction price is below the market price (sell the cheaper coins and pocket the difference).



823. Post 15304885 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.53h):

Goddamn Finex, start those engines again or I am going to miss all the fun.



824. Post 15305784 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 21, 2016, 01:01:07 PM
Two bad things for Bitcoin in the past few days that may have caused this are the auction in Australia (that ends in a few hours) and the Brexit vote is polling heavily toward the Remain folks after their MP was shot.

Could be why the West is leading the bear market, they consider those things as big factors. While Chinese just want to get their money out of Yuan.

Potential turn arounds, the Australian auction results come out with a high price paid. And Brexit wins Friday morning.

Speaking of which, how do I do a long on Bitfinex? Do I have to have USD on the exchange? I currently have some BTC on there (I just logged in after a few years and saw I had .8 BTC still on there).

Currently, you can't do shit on Finex, they are having issues (nice timing  Undecided ).  When they come up again, you can do leverage long with BTC as collateral (just remember that the value of your collateral goes down together with your leverage position in this case).



825. Post 15306431 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Let the games begin  Grin



826. Post 15306874 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 21, 2016, 02:24:09 PM
Currently, you can't do shit on Finex, they are having issues (nice timing  Undecided ).  When they come up again, you can do leverage long with BTC as collateral (just remember that the value of your collateral goes down together with your leverage position in this case).

Thanks for the help. I went ahead and tested with $500. I now have $500 in my "Unused Margin Funding" tab. I tried to do a purchase with that but it says I don't have enough money.

How do I take that $500 and go long on BTC?

Go to the margin trading tab and place an order, it ll automatically take the dollars you reserved first.

BTW: your collateral needs to be in your trading wallet as well.



827. Post 15321702 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Selloff 2 in progress?



828. Post 15321928 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: strawbs on June 22, 2016, 04:30:24 PM
Wow, this is impressive
My guess is we'll go lower still



829. Post 15321962 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: Gyrsur on June 22, 2016, 04:33:30 PM
Wow, this is impressive
My guess is we'll go lower still

so crypto is done?  Cool
If you call a good buying opportunity 'done', then yes  Grin



830. Post 15322746 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on June 22, 2016, 05:28:43 PM
I see a bunch of technical analysis having predicted this, but did they predict the Bitfinex thing? Where does the line between TA and self fulfilling prophecy meet or is it rude to ask this question?
If the market was very bullish, the bitfinex hickup would be forgotten within an hour, and would not have had an impact on the price.



831. Post 15326515 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: RGR991 on June 23, 2016, 12:01:52 AM
People are getting liquidated on the way down putting more pressure on an already weak tape, eventually the price will hit a point where buyers will step in and on the way back up we will have less selling pressure to deal with.

In a market like this you have to actively be trading both short/long to maintain your $
actually BFX longs havent gone down a lot



832. Post 15326608 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on June 23, 2016, 12:13:32 AM
People are getting liquidated on the way down putting more pressure on an already weak tape, eventually the price will hit a point where buyers will step in and on the way back up we will have less selling pressure to deal with.

In a market like this you have to actively be trading both short/long to maintain your $
actually BFX longs havent gone down a lot


Can you provide a link for this, because I have not been able to find that information?
https://bfxdata.com/swaphistory/totals



833. Post 15329576 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

I think 540-555 might have been the bottom, the only thing bothering me is the fact that BFX longs are still so high...



834. Post 15332084 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: yefi on June 23, 2016, 12:03:55 PM
As long as it doesn't turn into a long term bear market where that was the turning point - the final high of bitcoin EVER - and where it drifts down to zero from here, we'll be ok  Wink

That would be about the worst outcome, i.e. that this was the next bubble. I'm expecting consolidation now in the 500 to 700 range as a base for the true bubble though, fingers crossed.
funny how often you and I think alike.



835. Post 15345404 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: ImI on June 24, 2016, 11:45:20 AM

pretty tame reaction tbh. price hovering around 650$ is quite disappointing after such a gross move. markets are down like 5-10% and bitcoin more or less the same? strange.
I don't see that much reason for a brexit to change the btc price.  Might just be me though, I really haven't given the consequences any thought.



836. Post 15392295 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: DaRude on June 28, 2016, 06:21:41 AM
A few thing people here don't seem to understand:

Most buying is done off exchanges and OTC. By a wide margin too.

China is not leading this market.

No fee Chinese exchanges are being used to "control" the market, because bots are linked and people think China is leading the market.
...
The rise to nearly 800 was one entity

...

If you figured this much out, then you probably also figured out that the one entity is not done yet either.

If one entity managed to corner BTC already, we have bigger issues
Funny how people always try to explain stuff through one hugely powerful entity, the great manipulator.  
I guess it is easier to imagine a single actor and attribute intentions to this actor than to imagine the net effects of a large number of individuals.



837. Post 15404679 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: gentlemand on June 28, 2016, 08:40:52 PM
Ancient history I know, but I can't find much or any mention anywhere on here of this article posted last month regarding our old friend Gox. According to this Gox was missing 80,000 BTC before Mr Karpeles even bought it.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/19/behind-the-biggest-bitcoin-heist-in-history-inside-the-implosion-of-mt-gox.html
Wow, seems like McCaleb is a sneaky bastard.



838. Post 15406973 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

My guess is the halving itself will be quite non-eventful



839. Post 15447633 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

short term looks bullish to me.



840. Post 15454857 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: oda.krell on July 03, 2016, 12:15:53 AM
It's finally happened. The good professor has snapped his marbles.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4qxchc/professor_of_computer_science_i_have_no_words/

Didn't realize he's still posting (not so much in here anymore though).

Always felt he was wrong on a number of things in here, stubbornly so unfortunately, but still added the occasional insight, and quite some rigor when it came to modeling (DAE dino graphs?).
Agreed.

It's funny though, that somebody who is the opposite of bitcoin's economical values target audience, and is "extremely sceptical" of it, is arguing to make it into something more of his liking.  Such hubris, much faceplant...



841. Post 15455331 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Quote from: giggidy23 on July 03, 2016, 03:10:29 PM
It's finally happened. The good professor has snapped his marbles.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4qxchc/professor_of_computer_science_i_have_no_words/

Didn't realize he's still posting (not so much in here anymore though).

Always felt he was wrong on a number of things in here, stubbornly so unfortunately, but still added the occasional insight, and quite some rigor when it came to modeling (DAE dino graphs?).
Agreed.

It's funny though, that somebody who is the opposite of bitcoin's economical values target audience, and is "extremely sceptical" of it, is arguing to make it into something more of his liking.  Such hubris, much faceplant...

>somebody who is the opposite of bitcoin's economical values target audience
What's "bitcoin's economical values target audience"?
For that matter, what's "economical values"?
Did you mean "economical" as "like economic, but makes people giggle"? (Think using "tragical" in place of "tragic," e.g. "Bitcoin's tankening to $650 a few minutes ago was quite tragical.")

Roughly put, I would say that it is people who like dislike inflationary money. Of course there are other properties of bitcoin that some people might value, but I believe the 21M is the crux.  Please spare me the technical  "but bitcoin will be inflationary x more years" nitpicking.  

As far as economical goes, not everybody lives in an English-speaking country Lambsie, but good for you that you can still giggle about something like that.  



842. Post 15465966 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

BTC price appears to like W forms lately



843. Post 15491448 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.54h):

Jezus people, learn to spot a troll.  The only question is whether Bulgarian is Lambie again or not.  My money is on yes.



844. Post 15511181 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on July 08, 2016, 07:48:09 AM
The amount of FUCD and general misinformed/malicious negativity that has been spread about the halving means there will be a relief rally of some sort when it turns out to be a nothing more than a quite boring, uneventful clicking over of the time-stamping calendar and everything works as advertised on the tin.

For those of us that have been around for the first one it isn't even a consideration but there are probably a lot of new faces who will be apprehensive about the deflationary mechanism in the bitcoin algorithm until they see it work with their own eyes.
Actually, the last halving coincided with the release of ASICS, which probably smoothed over the transition. So we might see a bit more of a slowdown this time around, but I don't expect any major issues.



845. Post 15512555 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Quote from: Totscha on July 08, 2016, 09:59:32 AM
The amount of FUCD and general misinformed/malicious negativity that has been spread about the halving means there will be a relief rally of some sort when it turns out to be a nothing more than a quite boring, uneventful clicking over of the time-stamping calendar and everything works as advertised on the tin.

For those of us that have been around for the first one it isn't even a consideration but there are probably a lot of new faces who will be apprehensive about the deflationary mechanism in the bitcoin algorithm until they see it work with their own eyes.
Actually, the last halving coincided with the release of ASICS, which probably smoothed over the transition. So we might see a bit more of a slowdown this time around, but I don't expect any major issues.

Well the ASICs started getting released a few months after the halving (Avalon) and not really in large quantities. It all happened around the april 2013 bubble. In early 2013 FPGAs still dominated the mining scene, with GPUs switching to LTC (Scrypt). It became an ASIC only game in late 2013 when they started being available en masse. So a full year after the halving.
Ok, it appears you are right.  Halving end of November and Garzik got the first ASIC for reviewing in January.  I still wonder if some of the producers might not have used the preorder money to manufacture the chips and already started mining before announcing successful production and shipping to customers.



846. Post 15525096 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

18



847. Post 15527769 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Happy halving everyone !



848. Post 15560573 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

Nice spike !



849. Post 15676273 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.55h):

will we revisit 5xx in the coming months?  I am starting to think so.



850. Post 15756895 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Bitcoin price is now so boring I actually forget about it for hours on end and started picking up past hobbies again...  Wtf bitcoin, you were supposed to be my 24/7 drugs of choice   Huh   Grin



851. Post 15780756 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: Hyperjacked on August 01, 2016, 06:42:05 PM
Must admit I bought some on the dip with some profits...but I still think it going lower

Likewise



852. Post 15792886 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Son of a bitch....   I hope it is only a small percentage that is stolen.



853. Post 15794391 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: paratox on August 02, 2016, 10:40:30 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4vtuxo/bitfinex_security_breach_trading_will_be_halted/d61oelu

Quote from: zanetackett
I can confirm that the loss from the hack stands at 119,756btc.
son of a bitch



854. Post 15794685 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: DaRude on August 02, 2016, 10:50:03 PM

That's more than i was hoping for. Any estimates how many coins they held?

That's also what i am wondering.



855. Post 15794769 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: Agaguk24 on August 02, 2016, 11:22:10 PM

seriously i dont even blame bitfinex, i blame everyone who is such a moron to keep his coins on exchanges. even after we had so many hacks meanwhile...

totally agree with you man... who leaves coin in an exchange after all these problems. Exchanges are made to be in --> out
Unless you want to be an active trader... which might not be the best idea after all....

Just think though, if you rush in and out, who is going to be your counterparty?  volatility all over the place.



856. Post 15794818 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 02, 2016, 11:27:36 PM
How come they lost so much? Aren't they storing cold?

No. Users had multisig addys. They didn't use hot/cold.
can you (or anyone else ) explain the 2/3 keys needed to move the coins?

1 is the client
1 is bitfienx

what's the 3rd???

I guess the thing is: why would Bitgo not sign when things look normal?  If they hadn't installed proper "danger signals" that would stop automatic processing, an automated 2-of-3 is as bad as a normal hot wallet.



857. Post 15794840 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: podyx on August 02, 2016, 11:29:44 PM
Are you guys buying or selling right now?

Anyone lost coins on finex btw?
I think I lost way too many.  I had margin long bids open, plus I deposited a bunch when BTC lending rates shot up to 0.3% a day, stupidly didn't think about risk assessment later on.
Should have known better, because I knew BFX were cowboys.



858. Post 15794847 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: Underoos on August 02, 2016, 11:32:29 PM
How come they lost so much? Aren't they storing cold?

No. Users had multisig addys. They didn't use hot/cold.
can you (or anyone else ) explain the 2/3 keys needed to move the coins?

1 is the client
1 is bitfienx

what's the 3rd???

you don't need third. That's why 2 out of 3, only need two sigs. I suppose the 3rd is the wallet provider, in case on of you two flakes out.
No, third is BFX as well, but held in cold-storage.



859. Post 15794883 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on August 02, 2016, 11:30:56 PM

seriously i dont even blame bitfinex, i blame everyone who is such a moron to keep his coins on exchanges. even after we had so many hacks meanwhile...

agreed, and think about why those people are storing coins on an exchange ... to earn interest from others who are shorting the bitcoin price

Lol, what exactly is so bad against lending coins to shorters.  You just take them back with an interest, so the net effect is that you take some money into the bitcoin system.
If you can't handle the price dipping for a while, then your belief in bitcoin is quite frail Marcus.



860. Post 15794915 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: Underoos on August 02, 2016, 11:36:19 PM
No, third is BFX as well, but held in cold-storage.

Thanks. 2 keys controlled by 1 party? what's the point? How does that work? (a link later would be fine).

sure but i would assume the clients keys where not the ones compromised

Spaceman_Spiff knows better than I.

What I ve read on reddit is that one key is used in a "hot" system by bitfinex, the other key is held in cold storage in case Bitgo bails/drops of the grid/whatever.



861. Post 15809196 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: AlexGR on August 03, 2016, 11:38:09 PM

If you are trading a larger spectrum, like "oh it's 550 today, I think it will rebound to 600+ levels in a week", why would I keep my money on the exchange? I'll buy at 550, take it to my wallet, return it to the exchange in a week, sell them then, get my fiat.

because you were waiting for a dip in the 5xx s and had bids ready to take a big leveraged long position?  FML



862. Post 15814340 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: AlexGR on August 03, 2016, 11:42:47 PM

If you are trading a larger spectrum, like "oh it's 550 today, I think it will rebound to 600+ levels in a week", why would I keep my money on the exchange? I'll buy at 550, take it to my wallet, return it to the exchange in a week, sell them then, get my fiat.

because you were waiting for a dip in the 5xx s and had bids ready to take a big leveraged long position?  FML

If I'm waiting a dip to buy with my fiat, then my problem is not the 10-40m confirmation times of bitcoin, but the eons of time that bank wires take.
leveraged with BTC as collateral.



863. Post 15879490 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Lol, bitfinex is going to start BFX token trading without any information about them, other than they are supposed to represent 1 USD prior to trading...

What a fucking joke... If they trade BFX tokens themselves, they are trading on insider information, because we don't know shit, and they do.



864. Post 16085701 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 29, 2016, 10:04:39 PM
It feels like the cryptomarket is just waiting for a solid scaling solution to happen for the price to skyrocket...

Yeah right.  Haven't you figured it out yet that the scaling issue (solution) is just made up?

The fact of the matter is that scaling is always going to be some kind of concern/issue in bitcoin, and accordingly, from time to time there are going to need to be adjustments and tweaks to balancing usefulness, security and spam... Currently, the blocksize limit is not a problem, and it is just a fabricated problem.  There are tweaks in the works including seg wit that are going to bring additional functionality and abilities to process larger volumes...

The other fact of the matter is that the price is merely going through a consolidation that is not really very connected to scaling - but instead just questions about whether the price is going up or down (which includes some considerations regarding whether we are going to experience another Bitfinex fiasco).  The recent bitfinex fiasco likely brings some hesitations concerning whether the next pump is going to be up or down.



I disagree , I think scaling (and LN in particular) deserves all the attention it is getting.  
Once we have great scale, and improved privacy/fungibility, we are technically golden imho.  All the other bells and whistles that will be added are just extras.  The only thing I would still really worry about is government reaction to improved privacy (which I would partially understand from their point of view).  And of course security could be an issue (Imagine if all or most Trezors became compromised  Undecided ), but I expect security practices to keep improving over time.



865. Post 16089173 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: gentlemand on August 30, 2016, 09:59:46 AM

I disagree , I think scaling (and LN in particular) deserves all the attention it is getting.  


One thing I'm curious about, did LN arrive from nowhere and then Core latched onto it? I can't quite remember how it emerged.
As far as I remember ,there was a white paper by Poon and Drya (continuing on the work of others) that introduced the details of a scheme for bidirectional payment channels, and how these could be used for the lightning network (but many details of how exactly the network should be set up were not yet figured out).  Rusty Russel made a blog series explaining the paper in somewhat simpler terms, and was hired by Blockstream to help develop / implement a LN, because they figured LN was an awesome idea (which it is).



866. Post 16094369 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on August 30, 2016, 11:30:40 PM
and also, let's build up (and continue to build up) our user base.

Not possible, Bitcoin is running at max capacity (250,000 tx per day). New users can only be added if existing users use Bitcoin less.

Maybe we can just agree to disagree?  I think that you are just making shit up, when you are suggesting that bitcoin is running at max capacity, and if your standard is comparing to visa or master card or some bullshit like that, then you are being a bit unrealistic in comparing apples and oranges.    The fact of the matter is that there is plenty of room on the bitcoin network for people who appreciate the value of decentralized immutable transmissions and holding of value.  So, in that regard, maybe if you are considering bitcoin to be full, then you are expecting bitcoin to be something other than what it is?

Certainly, my use of transmitting value on the blockchain has increased in the past year.  In 2014 and 2015, I probably conducted around 30 to 50 transactions on the blockchain.  In 2016, I have nearly doubled my quantity of transactions on the blockchain (maybe getting close to 100 transactions in the past year), yet contrary to your assertion, I have not experienced any meaningful nor significant perception of any kind of problem in sending and receiving transactions in a fairly expedited manner to whoever the fuck I want.  The timeline for the transactions being confirmed is very similar over the years. Maybe the fees went up a bit, from a few cents to nearly $.10 from time to time, but I can also send lower fee transactions, if I want.

Surely, if I send money from a bank or through another traditional payment system, I can send/get money quicker, but the fees are likely to be higher with less control by myself regarding when and to whom I can send usually, those kinds of quick transactions are interbank  (or banking institutions that have relationships with one another).  Most ACH transfers take several business days to receive, and over the weekend I am kind of screwed.  Bitcoin offers a certain kind of set of features that is unique to it.

Maybe this question of "maxed out" is a matter of perception, because I perceive bitcoin to be quite well functional and well under capacity, and we also have a lot of developments in the works - even though there is no current emergency.  In this regard, if I can get a transaction to go through within 24 hours, and I can accomplish such transaction with almost no fees, if I want to process it without fees.  I can send such transaction anyone that I want 365 days of the year, 7 days a week, 24 hours a day.  And, some folks consider that this system is NOT working quite well, as it is?   Yes, we have improvements on the way, including seg wit, but there is not really any kind of rush when we already have less than 24 hours to confirm independent censorship resistant, immutable transactions.  Hypothetically, if I want to send money to Wikileaks, no one can really stop me if I am using bitcoin... and in less than 24 hours,   (less than one hour in most cases), viola, they will have their money.

It's basic logic.  Assuming the size of a transaction stays constant, with a 1MB block already full of transactions, any new transactions that want to be included in that block need to take the place of other transactions.

You could argue that there are unnecessary transactions left in the block, and that we should try to be maximally efficient with the block space.
Or that it is ok for the bitcoin system to only be used by those who are willing and able to pay the most for it. 
In my estimation, that will always be the reality, there will always be some equilibrium point between fee price and demand.  The question is: will we succeed in making that fee price low enough that most people will chose to use bitcoin for various purposes. And can we accomplish that without significantly compromising the basic fundamentals that give bitcoin it's value (decentralisation etc.).



867. Post 16223161 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: AZwarel on September 12, 2016, 12:38:50 AM
Now that i have analyzed the time at where the selling started at different exchanges (huobi, finex, stamp), it is obviously coordinated. No way that random people start to sell on 3 major exchanges at the very same 1-3 minute time frame (21:12 UTC, on a Sunday evening, riiight). Organized dump, nothing to see here.

They probably been preparing for this for hours/days. (You need to load up btc on different exchanges, than start selling at the very same time on those exchanges, for an obvious loss i might add - i would just use an OCT service for unload large amount of btc, less hassle, better price - clear manipulation.)



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrage

Yes, well, that needs time to react/deposit/organize. No way, you can arbitrage in less than 30 sec, between different regions, unless you have substantial amount of deposits on different exchanges at the same time, and watching/running bots, and still, that would only be reactionary, not preemptive.
People don't program arbitrage bots to not have them running.



868. Post 16332169 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: Elwar on September 22, 2016, 03:26:53 PM
I am going to set up a trading bot to buy when this thread gets full of "block size" talk and sell when there are debates about how many thousands of dollars bitcoin will soon be worth.
That's not a bad idea actually.



869. Post 16341085 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.57h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on September 22, 2016, 07:18:35 PM
I am going to set up a trading bot to buy when this thread gets full of "block size" talk and sell when there are debates about how many thousands of dollars bitcoin will soon be worth.
That's not a bad idea actually.

This is incredible. The attitude here changes faster than my wife's during her "time of the month".

I can't keep up. Are we rich or is it all going down the pan today?
You do realize that there are multiple people on this forum who might hold opposing views, right?  Although with all of Lambies sockpuppet accounts, you could be forgiven for thinking otherwise.



870. Post 16518431 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):


Quote from: Dafar on October 10, 2016, 02:36:40 PM
With ViaBTC moving all their hashrate (~12%) to Bitcoin Unlimited... looks like SegWit is going to get blocked and scaling will be at a standstill again.


I don't see this as positive news at all.

Yeah, this would suck monkeyballs.  A veto / impasse situation is quite negative, but I don't want to sell my coins with so much of the good stuff just around the corner.



871. Post 16559186 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: DaRude on October 14, 2016, 12:30:56 AM
Bravo Professor Stolfi i see you have gained some notoriety


Quote
...Thus, bitcoins are more like "penny stock", shares of a company with no assets, no products, and no staff; or shares in a pure ponzi schema, like Madoff's fund...

Is this is all he got?? Clearly he doesn't know what a penny stock is, thus can't tell the difference between a "penny stock" and a "ponzi schema" as he's not even sure what to equate bitcoins to  Huh Might as well write that bitcoin will eat all your children or start a war!!, you know one of those barely relatable, but most importantly, VERY BAD THINGS!!

I say let him troll moar i'll get popcorn  Grin
Weak sauce indeed. Stolfi is capable of some astute insights but economically he often makes bizar claims.  Replace the word bitcoin with gold and you see how ridiculous these claims are.  "But this gold bar has no staff I tell you, so it must be a Ponzi ! "
Lol, reminds me of Nagle.



872. Post 16602611 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: yefi on October 17, 2016, 09:03:48 PM
Look the market cap is completely insane IMHO! That doesn't mean it can't go past a 100billion market cap...
Crazier things have happened...jay of course does not deserve a response

Cheers bitcoinland

I see this as a continuation of the bull trend. I take my inspiration here from the rare earth metals, which share characteristics in common with Bitcoin. Tops are nearly always mania spikes. The rally to 780 could have fit this description after the drop to 460, but this recovery invalidates that pattern. Next stop is 1000 imho.
Make that 4-6k



873. Post 16612061 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 19, 2016, 04:53:32 AM
Yes, better to have him come back and defend his "nutty" theories rather than attempts by me to insufficiently summarize them in my favor.   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
No offense JJG, but I don't think summarizing is your strong suit  Wink.



874. Post 16660240 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: molecular on October 23, 2016, 05:28:46 PM
Are we repeating 2013?

Does the June rise look fractally similar to April 2013? (also the course of the chart since that high look similar to me)


 ... July 09 2016-Nov. 2016 broadly lines up with post-halving behaviour for Nov. 28 2012 - March 2013, call it a definite maybe for now.

it would be epic...

best christmas ever?


Might take a bit longer this time. I definitely foresee epicness in the near future though.  Would feel more at ease if segwit wasn't being opposed though.



875. Post 16670701 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: becoin on October 24, 2016, 08:34:14 PM
(Sorry Mike. Loved your videos. The theory's perfect, you just identified the wrong asset.

Sorry guys but you don't get it. Bitcoin will not be used the way you imagine. Bitcoin will not be used directly as money between merchants and consumers. Different tokens based on bitcoin and backed by bitcoin will be used in competing payment systems where moving bitcoin on the blockchain will be the settlement layer. Gold will always be the ultimate money. The only but very important advantage of bitcoin compared to gold is that bitcoin is cheaper to audit and provide proof of reserves.
Lightning will use just use bitcoins, so will sidechains. If bitcoin will be the settlement layer, then the currency in use is bitcoin, not some other token.
The only advantage that I see to gold is its immutability.  Gold will always be gold.  Whereas bitcoin represents a form of agreement between people, the code of which is more changeable.  This means bitcoin can evolve, both in a positive or a negative way.  In a way bitcoin is a grand social/game theoretic experiment.  Will a great form of money be born, and will the essential elements of that money stay stable (is the system such that its incentives cause any deviation to 'autocorrect'), or will it in the crumble in the end?



876. Post 16670718 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: toknormal on October 24, 2016, 08:50:26 PM
Bitcoin will not be used directly as money between merchants and consumers. Different tokens based on bitcoin and backed by bitcoin will be used in competing payment systems where moving bitcoin on the blockchain will be the settlement layer.

I actually agree with this. I see 2 types of "money". One with price stability and goods denomination as its priority which (it necessarily follows) must be inflationary. One for long term store of value which (it necessarily follows) must be deflationary.

I disagree. Why would I as an individual hold anything else than the deflationary kind of money if it is equally easy to store and spend it as the inflationary type.  Paper and digital dollars were easier to transact with than gold coins, bitcoin will hopefully be as easy and cheap (if not more) to transact with as digital fiat.

Quote from: becoin on October 24, 2016, 09:22:23 PM
Which type of gold ?

The paper type ? It's available in unlimited supply.

The physical type ? It's un-tradeable in any significant quantity.

Only investment grade physical gold. It is tradeable everywhere!

The margins gold dealers ask are generally quite high.



877. Post 16671058 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: toknormal on October 24, 2016, 09:41:37 PM
I disagree. Why would I as an individual hold anything else than the deflationary kind of money if it is equally easy to store and spend it as the inflationary type.

Because modern societies don't like prices floating all over the place due to a fixed supply monetary base. It makes it impossible to plan and you'd have loads of manufacturing businesses, for example, simply going bust. Even if you did have a fixed supply they'd just invest in a huge amount of hedging derivatives to minimise their exposure to price volatility and that would inflate the effective money supply instead.

As economies expand, demands for liquidity have to be met. They can either be met by expanding and contracting the money supply (and keeping prices relatively stable) or by price inflation - which will just carry a similar cost in terms of adverse commercial conditions, bankruptcies and localised losses. If you're a car manufacturer, you're more interested in the "stable price" type of money. If you're a long term saver then you're more interested in the "stable supply" type of money. There have always been these two types and always will be.
Thanks for the reply, I ll have to think this over.



878. Post 16704317 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: calme on October 27, 2016, 07:33:21 PM
Yeah, best case scenario would be to hover @ 680 for at least a few days. Better to keep the staircase going for as long as possible, in order to start the parabolic spike from a higher platform. But there is no global coalition mandating that we all just hold hands and agree to only buy a little instead of a lot. Too many folks like me (all in and on leverage, and sometimes adding to their positions on the way up).  Grin
I closed my leverage long for a very minor loss a few hours before the upmove began in earnest.
I will feel more at ease if Segwit is able to activate.  Of course, everybody might be thinking the same or by then it might be too late already (buy the rumor sell the news?).
I am ok with missing out on some profit though.  I have learned that I make the most mistakes when I want to squeeze every drop of (imagined future) profit out of my trades.



879. Post 16725132 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Lots of alts in the shitter today.



880. Post 16727434 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: AZwarel on October 29, 2016, 11:11:22 PM
Now that i think about it, there are really new people want to in. We are just so used to all the "fake good news", we can not fathom the possibility, that there are really a new wave of users/speculators. Two of my friends asked me this week how to buy btc, even though i was telling about it for alas 2 years by now. Weird. Is there some MSM article/policy change i've missed?

I know there was one MSM article translated here in my country which mentioned bitcoin as a "independent safe heaven asset", but still.
It's a time effect.  At first people think Bitcoin is interesting, but too weird to be for real.  Then after they forget about it for a while and they rediscover it, seeing that it is still thriving, they believe it just might stick around, and they want to get in on the action.
Time makes things go from too strange to be true to business as usual.



881. Post 16747112 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.58h):

Quote from: DaRude on November 01, 2016, 06:41:48 PM
well i miss those old guise. glad you're still around molecular.

this is some serious old school moonage we got going on here.

At least NLC is gone too...for now (or is s/he?)

Was too busy trolling Reddit as Mistaik.



882. Post 16914526 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Lauda on November 18, 2016, 09:53:57 AM
Please discuss development related stuff elsewhere, this thread and the section should primarily be about price talk. There is a Segwit thread in this very sub-forum.

Well yes, but atm Segwit is a major component of the price action (in my assessment anyway).



883. Post 16943078 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: yefi on November 21, 2016, 08:09:42 AM
nope. if someone had the private key the only thing that means is that they have satoshi's private key. they could've found it, been sent it, bought it, tortured it out of him. anyone on the planet could do that.

that doesn't prove you're satoshi by any means.

by extra mile i mean providing research and evidence you'd been looking into bitcoin's creation for years before.


2017, the rise of the Hobo Empire...



884. Post 17030287 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: TERA on November 29, 2016, 01:10:38 AM
Bitcoin is too fragile to be used for 'global economic unity' or anything like that. Try to think in a timespan of beyond 20 years in which it will definitely be hacked/cracked by then or they will find some way to keep the network from functioning in some way or the other. In a best case scenario, we briefly touch something like $20,000 in a speculative bubble before crashing. That is the play here.
Maybe so, but maybe not. Let's find out shall we?

..........

.......... Goddamn this is taking too long !  



885. Post 17056945 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Chart is lookin very pretty.



886. Post 17057837 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: toknormal on December 02, 2016, 09:14:04 AM

Most bullish chart ever. Breakout after 3 year consolidation.

Not a double top.

It is an extremely good-looking chart indeed.   Now if you could all act very pessimistic and gloomy about the price (and activate Segwit), that would be the icing on the cake  Grin .



887. Post 17057936 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: molecular on December 02, 2016, 10:03:42 AM

Most bullish chart ever. Breakout after 3 year consolidation.

Not a double top.

It is an extremely good-looking chart indeed.   Now if you could all act very pessimistic and gloomy about the price (and activate Segwit), that would be the icing on the cake  Grin .
Definitely an option in my book.  Core seems uncompromising in its attitude, and a decent amount of bitcoiners seem opposed to them, so 95% seems like an unlikely target.
Quite a shame though, bitcoin could really use all the innovations that an activation would enable (I know you might disagree).  The most likely outcome seems that development will be stalled for a substantial time, which is not a win in my book.  People paying for their pizza with btc would give bitcoin a positive vibe, a larger userbase, and thus more political clout.



888. Post 17058133 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: julian071 on December 02, 2016, 10:28:29 AM

Most bullish chart ever. Breakout after 3 year consolidation.

Not a double top.

It is an extremely good-looking chart indeed.   Now if you could all act very pessimistic and gloomy about the price (and activate Segwit), that would be the icing on the cake  Grin .
  • I highly doubt segwit will activate.
Definitely an option in my book.  Core seems uncompromising in its attitude, and a decent amount of bitcoiners seem opposed to them, so 95% seems like an unlikely target.
Quite a shame though, bitcoin could really use all the innovations that an activation would enable (I know you might disagree).  The most likely outcome seems that development will be stalled for a substantial time, which is not a win in my book.  People paying for their pizza with btc would give bitcoin a positive vibe, a larger userbase, and thus more political clout.

It would, just look at the huge opportunity that is being missed right now with the cash money-debacle in India. An altcoin or multiple altcoins will fill that hole, as BTC development is just too slow and not really focussed on making BTC a viable option for low value transactions. BTC will just be the settlement layer for higher value transactions (hopefully).
If lightning works as promised/thought, then plenty of low-value transactions would be made with btc.



889. Post 17059059 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on December 02, 2016, 12:35:11 PM

When is Lightning going to get launched for "ordinary people" to try ?

When is Segwit getting launched ?

Is it getting launched ?

Here is some info to your query.
https://bitcoincore.org/en/2016/10/27/release-0.13.1/


For someone who isn't a miner or computer wizard like myself this is tricky to understand. So it may NOT be activated?
IIRC LN is possible without Segwit, but it is a lot more complicated to create that way.



890. Post 17113210 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on December 07, 2016, 08:50:42 PM
looks like $780 is all but done now ... cut your looses shorts.

$800 next stop.

780?

770 is resistance. You're assuming the bulls will blast through that?

Or maybe you're looking at a different exchange than the ones I look at?


any genuine exchange is trading >$780 spot price ... fake coins and futures exchanges are only sometimes indicative of real deliverable coins prices, sometimes they catch up
Bitstamp, bitfinex and btc-e are all fake?



891. Post 17114036 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: AlexGR on December 07, 2016, 10:04:58 PM
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-price-triple-2017-saxo-bank-prediction/ What do you guys think of this news?
Is there a possibility of this prediction to come true?

yes. or it could be $2 or $200,000. most experts were predicting $4000 plus for 2014. that didn't quite happen.

2$ won't happen either. Reason being the difficulty in mining and the associated costs of producing a coin:

Bitcoin Difficulty:   286,765,766,821
Estimated Next Difficulty:   309,172,039,310 (+7.81%)
Adjust time:   After 1105 Blocks, About 7.1 days
Hashrate(?):   2,237,224,131 GH/s


All these mining data centers, are multi-million investments...
A turd that costs 2 billion to produce isn't necessarily worth 2 billion...



892. Post 17118894 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Looks to me like we are getting close to a make or break point in the rally in the next couple of days.



893. Post 17119663 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: brokedummy on December 08, 2016, 12:26:39 PM
Looks to me like we are getting close to a make or break point in the rally in the next couple of days.

The next 24 hours are critical?
might take longer than that, but TA-wise, I would say yes.



894. Post 17122222 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: 0xfff on December 08, 2016, 05:56:33 PM
Good mornin' Bitcoinland.

Still going flat sideways for a week now... $777USD/$1027CAD.

Coiling for a big move in which direction? My guess (surprise, surprise!) is up.

I don't want to ruin the hype but who is buying when the price is so high? I see $777 and all I can think about is those poor folks who bought at $2000. How much higher do you think it is going to go?
Price didn't go to 2000 (not on an exchange with normal liquidity anyway)



895. Post 17159249 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: yefi on December 12, 2016, 11:30:14 AM
Let's not see 777 become the new 666 Tongue
The 666 from 2014 or the 666 from 2016?



896. Post 17173354 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Ibian on December 13, 2016, 03:44:12 PM
Mats problem is that he is stuck on the idea that the only right way to make money is to daytrade. Realizing that he sucks at it, he doubles down and loses even harder.

Meanwhile I just made a hundred bucks in two minutes by buying on localbitcoins and immediately reselling on kraken. There are plenty of ways to make things work for the open minded.
In-person or purely online?



897. Post 17175218 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Ibian on December 13, 2016, 06:41:56 PM
Mats problem is that he is stuck on the idea that the only right way to make money is to daytrade. Realizing that he sucks at it, he doubles down and loses even harder.

Meanwhile I just made a hundred bucks in two minutes by buying on localbitcoins and immediately reselling on kraken. There are plenty of ways to make things work for the open minded.
In-person or purely online?
I always deal in cash in person, on principle. I want as little middleman involvement as possible (banks, other third parties) and I don't like "paper trails". Personal privacy is one of my big issues.
Yeah, the thing is I imagine getting followed and 5-dollar-wrenched by a junkie or criminal of some sort.



898. Post 17178100 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Ibian on December 14, 2016, 05:57:34 AM
Mats problem is that he is stuck on the idea that the only right way to make money is to daytrade. Realizing that he sucks at it, he doubles down and loses even harder.

Meanwhile I just made a hundred bucks in two minutes by buying on localbitcoins and immediately reselling on kraken. There are plenty of ways to make things work for the open minded.
In-person or purely online?
I always deal in cash in person, on principle. I want as little middleman involvement as possible (banks, other third parties) and I don't like "paper trails". Personal privacy is one of my big issues.
Yeah, the thing is I imagine getting followed and 5-dollar-wrenched by a junkie or criminal of some sort.
Denmark is incredibly peaceful. Too much for my taste. But if something like that did ever happen, well let's just say I can handle myself.

But really, the sort of people who are into bitcoin at this stage all tend to be intelligent people, and it's mostly low-IQ people who become criminals. 85 is supposedly the sweet spot for crime. It's not an issue.
I guess you have a point.



899. Post 17197419 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: yefi on December 15, 2016, 10:46:23 AM
Duke944 is Lambie/TalksCheap/Kwuckduck in disguise. He is using the same words over and over, pretty easy to discover.

I assumed that guy had found gainful employment (or died).
Lambie is active on reddit a lot under BitcoinistanRising, Dropalog and so on (I think at least, maybe he has some sympaticos).  I am pretty sure Kwuckduck isn't Lambie though.



900. Post 17210376 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

looking good...  Cheesy



901. Post 17246763 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Movin on up  Grin !

EDIT: ... and down again   Shocked

EDIT: ... and up again   Cheesy



902. Post 17250446 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: Karartma1 on December 21, 2016, 07:24:08 AM


Bitcoin is maturing, even the moon cartoons are starting to look more professional !  Cheesy



903. Post 17262698 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: jbreher on December 22, 2016, 09:23:40 AM
possibly, some of the bigger whales may have decided to pull some of their cash off of the exchange,

Sounds as if you think whales keep the bulk of their coins parked on an exchange? With the propensity of pecuniary pilferers plundering principal, would that not be a particularly problematic proclivity?

The trick is to transfer to thy trusted Trezor to truly thwart the thieves.



904. Post 17265900 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Consolidating for a day seems in order.



905. Post 17269821 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: julian071 on December 22, 2016, 10:09:56 PM
Fight!!



Heihachi Mishima wins!!
Nah, Eddy Gordo, any noob could win by bashing the "kick" buttons  Smiley.



906. Post 17272867 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Wow, did not expect to wake up to this...



907. Post 17278037 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Back to 860?



908. Post 17299373 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: kehtolo on December 25, 2016, 08:22:46 PM
Well, head and shoulders chart pattern complete... resume uptrend. And.. that's what looks to be happening.

We'll be back over 900 next week. Could see 1000 fall in 2016 yet!
Um, head and shoulders are bearish, no?  

I am still quite bullish for the upcoming week though.  There is greed in the air, but given the long winter, it seems more likely to be spring than the end of summer.



909. Post 17313076 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 27, 2016, 10:22:30 AM
where's tera these days?
He was posting a while back, so he is still in the game.

Price action is looking promising boys and girls, I am expecting another jump up...



910. Post 17313429 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 27, 2016, 11:05:31 AM
where's tera these days?
He was posting a while back, so he is still in the game.

Price action is looking promising boys and girls, I am expecting another jump up...

Tera,

Tends to engage in a bit of wishful bearish thinking, and was kind of promoting bearish ideas in the lower $600s, and we have seen how that has worked out.. . so maybe she has been making incorrect BTC predictions in recent times.

Surely, it would not be a good idea to short these days, but taking some profits off the table may not be as bad of an idea. 

Quote from: TERA on December 03, 2016, 07:29:05 PM
In any case the only sensible thing to do is hold. Maybe sell a small portion (permanently) if you think you need the money. You can't really trade because the exchanges suck and have low volume and it's so hard to predict a move or re-entry point, and your gain is unlikely to exceed taxes.



911. Post 17313503 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Tzupy on December 27, 2016, 11:32:54 AM
On Bitstamp the 12h PSAR flipped to bullish, on Chinese exchanges it's close but not yet.
You know what it means when even Tzupy gets bullish  Grin .



912. Post 17313618 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Tzupy on December 27, 2016, 11:43:22 AM
On Bitstamp the 12h PSAR flipped to bullish, on Chinese exchanges it's close but not yet.
You know what it means when even Tzupy gets bullish  Grin .

Flipped now on OKCoin too. This could mean a new major leg up, or that we are close to the top of the current leg up and a sizable correction will follow soon.
Now that's more like the bear I know.  Not like Ted E., the traitor of his kind who is only a bear in name  Wink .



913. Post 17313830 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on December 27, 2016, 10:35:51 AM
Price action is looking promising boys and girls, I am expecting another jump up...
Because I love boasting... called it  Grin



914. Post 17313865 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on December 27, 2016, 12:20:30 PM
[edited]


What is going to happen?

3
pulling an Adam.  32k by tomorrow !!!  Cheesy



915. Post 17313913 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Meuh6879 on December 27, 2016, 12:26:12 PM
Double-TOP detected.
try looking at more than 1 exchange...



916. Post 17314022 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Hunyadi on December 27, 2016, 12:35:01 PM

Awesome pic  Grin



917. Post 17314035 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on December 27, 2016, 12:40:17 PM
Since we are boasting, check out this call:

Xmas correction to 860$ and then rocket goes to moon?

Nice !



918. Post 17314376 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Paashaas on December 27, 2016, 01:14:55 PM
$1000 before end of the week?

I think we will get there, this will be a very nice new years party.

I dont drink alcohol but when i see $1000 i'll buy/drink a small bottle of Bacardy while watching the charts  Tongue
Be careful not to wake up with a hangover and okcoin.com open showing a 20x leverage position with all your coins that got liquidated  Wink



919. Post 17314720 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Suit up !




920. Post 17319308 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: GreekGeek on December 27, 2016, 08:30:35 PM

check  bitcoinaverage.com  you can see the whole price history as well as volume
keep in mind that the volume is in BTC and not in USD (fiat) , a rough calculation will show that USD volume  (or fiat in general) is actually quite high and only Oct-Dec 2013 USD volume is higher than now
cool site



921. Post 17324207 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Feels good to be long  Grin



922. Post 17324461 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: harrymmmm on December 28, 2016, 10:45:53 AM
Sincere question:

Do you believe the mathematics of fibonacci sequences has anything at all to do with the supply/demand bitcoin market intrinsically?

OR: Do you believe that many traders believe that, so the effect will be the same?

OR: something else?

If Fibonacci and TA works, it is because they are able to capture human valuation psychology.  Secondary to that, indeed traders might give temporarily give a sort of positive feedback loop when key resistance levels are broken, causing movements to be violent shortly after passing resistance levels.  Of course all of this is tempered by traders anticipating these patterns and frontrunning them, so the more mature a market is, the less I would expect these patterns to be relevant.



923. Post 17325208 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Kraken taking the lead.



924. Post 17325668 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on December 28, 2016, 01:34:52 PM
We have a date with history, gentlemen.
Been a while since you have been around !

You have picked the right time: moving on up !



925. Post 17326849 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Auch



926. Post 17326958 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: madmat on December 28, 2016, 03:41:26 PM
Auch

It is crashing. End of bitcoin. Sell everything.

For sure  Wink .

No, it's just that leveraged trading makes me feel these stings harder than usual.



927. Post 17344010 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Not sure what will happen here.  
A decent-sized correction could be in the books.
On the other hand, a quick runup to 1060-1100 after some stalling at this price level wouldn't surprise me either.

I closed my leverage positions, we'll see which way the dice fall.  

Longer-term I am still bullish.



928. Post 17365434 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Happy 1000 bucks everyone !



929. Post 17370333 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.00h):

Quote from: ErisDiscordia on January 02, 2017, 08:52:36 AM
$3K per BTC by end of 2017 or bust.... Sad

I thought it was $3200 as decreed by that ancient oracle "adamstgBit" who has passed on to another realm.

So is it written. Verily it shall come to pass.

$32000. It is known.
It is known.



930. Post 17396746 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: rtrtcrypto on January 04, 2017, 04:08:16 PM
Just charge in dollars and accept payment in BTC with a window of a few hrs after the job is complete.
That way you can always charge the same for the job and no one will feel like they over or underpaid.


I have a problem with this price rise:

As many people know, I fix people's bitcoin miners for bitcoin payments. Thus I have to account for my time, skills, experience, and material costs (damn FPGAs are expensive when they blow up). I price my work in bitcoin because I want this currency to have a reason to exist other than as a speculation thingie.

Problem is the fluctuations: If I charge .3btc for a service and bitcoin drops from 600 to 300 I don't want to raise my bitcoin prices so I kept them constant. Likewise if it goes from 600-1200 I don't want to change my prices for the same basic reason (I'm doing work for a certain amount of bitcoin). But if it keeps going haywire, what do I do? What's fair? And at what point am I simply doing work for dollars instead of Bitcoin?

It's complex.
As long as dollars are less volatile than bitcoins, this method makes a lot more sense ( perhaps with a yearly repricing to account for inflation or other market dynamics).



931. Post 17396763 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: Kramerc on January 04, 2017, 05:06:37 PM
Hmm, this isn't looking as bearish as I'd like... Maybe the Chinese will pull an extension?

What about the BFX shorters' prisoner dilemma? There's 16k of them and only 6k in total asks.
An order book can change quickly

Also 8012 yuan, new ATH in yuan.



932. Post 17396804 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Well that escalated quickly...



933. Post 17397093 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

So yeah, here is me wishing I hadn't closed most of my (new) leverage longs a few hours ago...



934. Post 17405827 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

I keep forgetting that I should set limit orders in times like this.  Would have loved to catch that spike on Finex but I was just taking a nap...  I guess events like these are why you tend to be glued to the screen 24/7 ...



935. Post 17407319 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Tried to catch the falling knife too soon on OKcoin and got liquidated hard :-/.



936. Post 17421505 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

I am quite sure we are going up now.
Unfortunately I underestimated the magnitude of the downwards correction, so now I am mostly looking to recoup my losses.
I know hindsight is 20/20, but this was really within the range of the predictable, and I should have made out like a bandit  Angry .  Ah well...



937. Post 17421787 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: offliberty on January 06, 2017, 05:30:54 PM
I am quite sure we are going up now.
Unfortunately I underestimated the magnitude of the downwards correction, so now I am mostly looking to recoup my losses.
I know hindsight is 20/20, but this was really within the range of the predictable, and I should have made out like a bandit  Angry .  Ah well...

Cheers mate. Happy recovering. Stuck as well  Embarrassed Shitty day to start the week end.

Which are your favorite crypto-related Twitter accounts to follow ? I'm currently setting up alerts via IFTTT that automatically pushes me news I would miss otherwise.
I don't actively follow any twitter accounts.  Guess I am getting old  Smiley .



938. Post 17422593 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: practicaldreamer on January 06, 2017, 06:57:45 PM
What role does shorting play in a market ?

What does it bring to the table ?

Serious question.

Or is it just parasitic ?

It can be a force to bring an asset to it's proper value.  Let's say somebody starts StupidCoin, which is valued at 2 billion dollar but brings nothing useful to the table and is full with bugs.  Somehow, StupidCoin buyers still believe the marketcap is worth 2 billion.  The only option people have in a buy-only market is to not take part in that market.  When you can short, you can borrow the asset and sell it, thinking it will go down in price.  If you are correct, you will make a profit.  Thus, shorting could moderate irrational markets and help assets find their fair price sooner.  On the other hands, due to the mechanics of leveraged trading, this allows for all sorts of liquidation shenanigans.



939. Post 17423847 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on January 06, 2017, 08:48:44 PM
This really is not a pleasant place to be at the moment hey.

Real blood on the streets.

really? seems fine to me. the rise was a little silly and unrealistic. anyone shocked by this hasn't been paying enough attention the last few years. let's see what the rest of this month brings before getting gloomy.
Yeah, I think the general sentiment is still quite positive, people are bullish.



940. Post 17458934 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Chart is looking good imho (but I appear to be prone to bullish optimism lately): 950-960 incoming?



941. Post 17463563 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.01h):

Next 24 hrs are critical  Cool



942. Post 17474297 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.02h):

Wow, I ate a big bag of shit today. Got wiped out.  I guess that's what you get when you get overconfident.



943. Post 17954232 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

sweet price action.



944. Post 17959464 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Obligatory breakout confirmation dump?  

By the way, you might want to change a number of your online passwords: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/5vuih9/internet_psa_cloudbleed_cloudflare_leaked/



945. Post 17967027 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Does anyone know how the COIN ETF shares would enter the market?  Is it basically just the Winklevoss twins that start of with all the shares who can then sell however much they want at whatever price and time they want?



946. Post 17968615 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: European Central Bank on February 24, 2017, 08:05:47 PM
It only takes a trillion USD market cap for $50k bitcoin. There is a total of ~$25 trillion in USA IRA's. Is it that hard to imagine global speculative bubbles that touch but do not sustain $1 trillion market cap by 2025? 2020?

0.1% of USA IRA funds ($25 billion) into the ETF bring us over $2500/BTC, and that is ignoring speculative buying by people in the trenches (us!).

you're forgetting how meaningless market cap is compared to real money.

25 billion real dollars put into bitcoin would push the price far beyond $2500. right now you could probably reach that price on the exchanges by spending 50-100 million dollars in one shot.

and if sellers sniffed out that there was a buyer with money to burn they'd go on strike and push the price up even further.
Only short term, in the long run, I think market cap is a very useful measure (it might only take a small amount of money to push up a market cap by a big amount, but then you are counting on people not cashing out, which might not happen short term, but long term.... )



947. Post 17971818 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: BTCtrader71 on February 25, 2017, 12:28:03 AM
It only takes a trillion USD market cap for $50k bitcoin. There is a total of ~$25 trillion in USA IRA's. Is it that hard to imagine global speculative bubbles that touch but do not sustain $1 trillion market cap by 2025? 2020?

0.1% of USA IRA funds ($25 billion) into the ETF bring us over $2500/BTC, and that is ignoring speculative buying by people in the trenches (us!).

you're forgetting how meaningless market cap is compared to real money.

25 billion real dollars put into bitcoin would push the price far beyond $2500. right now you could probably reach that price on the exchanges by spending 50-100 million dollars in one shot.

and if sellers sniffed out that there was a buyer with money to burn they'd go on strike and push the price up even further.
Only short term, in the long run, I think market cap is a very useful measure (it might only take a small amount of money to push up a market cap by a big amount, but then you are counting on people not cashing out, which might not happen short term, but long term.... )

haha we think alike:


There are two ways to think about the relationship between market cap and how much "real money" is invested into bitcoin.

1) short term. ECB is correct to point out that an injection of 25 billion dollars of "real money" would drive the price to the moon in the short term, due to liquidity issues.

2) long term. If you think in terms of steady state conditions, then cmacwiz's reasoning makes perfect sense.




Great minds huh  Wink.  Funny that I overlooked your post (I guess because I was a bit drunk).



948. Post 17975593 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

great cartoon on r/bitcoin  Grin :




949. Post 17976127 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

dumping



950. Post 17979414 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: spooderman on February 25, 2017, 08:30:59 PM
the ETF is nothing but trouble for bitcoin. best case: it fails, we crash and recover.
Why?



951. Post 17991515 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: K~Ehleyr on February 26, 2017, 11:22:37 PM
But who knows, this is Bitcoin, after all.

In my payment system we have problem, and that problem is the jew.  He take all of your transaction fee, and he give none back to you.
What's the problem with jews and bitcoins?
You can't say the miner's fees were their idea?
To have service filled you have to pay for it.
It is just that cut and dry. But how much they can charge for that service is a another thing to discuss.
So please lets just keep the jews out of this for now.  Embarrassed

I have r0ach on ignore. His bigoted neo-nazi attitude toward everybody that isn't him makes me want to vomit.
My guess is you are not the only one.  Athough I found his pseudo-scientific ramblings about genetics particularly amusing.
Anyways, best not to feed the troll...



952. Post 18041202 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Forget an ATH and "gold parity", the true crazyness of today: BTC-e almost at the same price as Stamp and Finex.  Grin



953. Post 18051899 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: Elwar on March 03, 2017, 10:53:04 AM


Funny  Grin



954. Post 18092711 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.04h):

Quote from: maciek1o3s on March 06, 2017, 10:06:57 PM
Can someone explain we what is going on? For the last few days everyone was talking about EFT, but today from few hours you are talking about some "BU", "Antpool", "pool"and other stuff. I'm pretty new in BTC and I don't understand what you are taking about, could someone help me?

I wouldn't know how to summarize or distill it further as you have to be somewhat familiar with bitcoin to grasp it. Bottom line if you are a new user. You are safe if you keep your coins off online wallets and exchanges as this blows over. Secure them in Hard ware wallets if you can or an offline computer.

Why do you recommend this ? Some people are here to trade and invest and buy-sell- sell-buy... why if i have coins to the exchange i maybe have problem?
( don't tell me is not safe like gox we all know that but it's the price to pay if something happen in case of hacker - or government Smiley we know that, at least we took a lesson with gox )

but what this have to do?

It is all about having options. If there is an imminent hard fork you want to have possession of your private keys as you have more options. The safest most private way is to run a Bitcoin Core node on a home computer. Second would be a hardware wallet like Trezor or Ledger Nano S.
Wait, Electrum is not safe anymore?

Do I understand correctly that some safety gap appeared in bitcoin world in the last few days?
Not really.  They are discussing the possibility of a hard fork in the bitcoin blockchain.  There is disagreement about how to scale bitcoin and 2 camps have formed.  If a cryptocurrency is hardforked, it can turn into 2 new currencies (see ethereum and ethereum classic).  If you control the private keys of the pre-fork coin, you will have both coins after the fork.  However, an exchange could perhaps not recognize 1 of the 2 coins and give you only the 1 they consider legitimate.  That's why its safe to control the private keys prior to a hardfork.
Also, after the hardfork you want to make sure that sending your coins on 1 chain doesn't result in somebody stealing your coins on the other chain (I think, not an expert).



955. Post 18107222 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Bottom in ?



956. Post 18115069 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

mmm, not looking too great right now.



957. Post 18135543 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Is there any actual news of approval or not?



958. Post 18135604 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: mckk on March 10, 2017, 01:48:22 PM
Imagine someone with long position opened - price soars to 1336$, guy is extremely happy and 15 seconds later position is liquidated by broker because of 1069$ drop. LOL

I actually misread Marcus' comment into thinking it was approved.  Had a big position open, failed to sell at the top, luckily no liquidation and escaped with some profits...

EDIT: from the quotes it would seem that he initially did say that is was approved.



959. Post 18135967 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

I have the feeling that it is going to be a long day... Undecided



960. Post 18139948 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

I imagine adrenaline levels are higher around the globe  Grin



961. Post 18140276 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Goddamn, sitting here all day long, and then apparently I put in the wrong feeds or something, because I didn't see anything except for on this thread, and by that time it was below 1100 already...    Angry Cry



962. Post 18141092 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: eddie13 on March 10, 2017, 09:48:03 PM
kraken and coinbase both seem fine from bitcoinwisdom..
Pretty much inline with stamp and finex..
Kraken is ok now, but was completely unreachable.  Maybe API commands from bots worked, or perhaps some region weren't blocked.

Still beating myself up that I followed the wrong RSS feeds...



963. Post 18187491 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Holliday on March 14, 2017, 03:07:44 PM
It has been a lot time that i not monitor this thing. we don't have a voting process on that? who makes the final decision ? hard fork could f@ck bitcoin price and trust of course...  
No. There is no "voting process" in a decentralized cryptocurrency. The whole ecosystem either comes to a decision by consensus or not. You technically give your "vote" by running or adopting a specific soft fork, hard fork, or implementation.

I'd say the only vote that matters, in Bitcoin or anywhere really, is the voting that you do with your wallet.

I think some sort of voting system based on BTC holdings is sorely needed for coordinating development.
Buying and selling can only be done after a decision has been made, only brings 1d information (up or down, a little or much) and more importantly is only the net result of many different forces (macroeconomics etc.) so it will generally be hard to say the price is going up because of reason X or Y.



964. Post 18187717 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 14, 2017, 06:45:15 PM
It has been a lot time that i not monitor this thing. we don't have a voting process on that? who makes the final decision ? hard fork could f@ck bitcoin price and trust of course...  
No. There is no "voting process" in a decentralized cryptocurrency. The whole ecosystem either comes to a decision by consensus or not. You technically give your "vote" by running or adopting a specific soft fork, hard fork, or implementation.

I'd say the only vote that matters, in Bitcoin or anywhere really, is the voting that you do with your wallet.

I think some sort of voting system based on BTC holdings is sorely needed for coordinating development.
Buying and selling can only be done after a decision has been made, only brings 1d information (up or down, a little or much) and more importantly is only the net result of many different forces (macroeconomics etc.) so it will generally be hard to say the price is going up because of reason X or Y.
Nope. We don't want a new 1% to control things.
Then tell me how things are controlled, because it is always controlled somehow.
Also, this voting should be non-binding, just to get an accurate idea of what bitcoin holders think.



965. Post 18187755 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 14, 2017, 06:50:30 PM
It has been a lot time that i not monitor this thing. we don't have a voting process on that? who makes the final decision ? hard fork could f@ck bitcoin price and trust of course...  
No. There is no "voting process" in a decentralized cryptocurrency. The whole ecosystem either comes to a decision by consensus or not. You technically give your "vote" by running or adopting a specific soft fork, hard fork, or implementation.

I'd say the only vote that matters, in Bitcoin or anywhere really, is the voting that you do with your wallet.

I think some sort of voting system based on BTC holdings is sorely needed for coordinating development.
Buying and selling can only be done after a decision has been made, only brings 1d information (up or down, a little or much) and more importantly is only the net result of many different forces (macroeconomics etc.) so it will generally be hard to say the price is going up because of reason X or Y.
Nope. We don't want a new 1% to control things.
Then tell me how things are controlled, because it is always controlled somehow.
It's not. That's the whole point.
You mean decisions just get made randomly?



966. Post 18187774 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 14, 2017, 06:53:15 PM
It has been a lot time that i not monitor this thing. we don't have a voting process on that? who makes the final decision ? hard fork could f@ck bitcoin price and trust of course...  
No. There is no "voting process" in a decentralized cryptocurrency. The whole ecosystem either comes to a decision by consensus or not. You technically give your "vote" by running or adopting a specific soft fork, hard fork, or implementation.

I'd say the only vote that matters, in Bitcoin or anywhere really, is the voting that you do with your wallet.

I think some sort of voting system based on BTC holdings is sorely needed for coordinating development.
Buying and selling can only be done after a decision has been made, only brings 1d information (up or down, a little or much) and more importantly is only the net result of many different forces (macroeconomics etc.) so it will generally be hard to say the price is going up because of reason X or Y.
Nope. We don't want a new 1% to control things.
Then tell me how things are controlled, because it is always controlled somehow.
It's not. That's the whole point.
You mean decisions just get made randomly?
No. Humans don't act randomly.
Then there is a way things work, thus certain groups exert control. 



967. Post 18188086 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 14, 2017, 07:02:05 PM
I think some sort of voting system based on BTC holdings is sorely needed for coordinating development.
Buying and selling can only be done after a decision has been made, only brings 1d information (up or down, a little or much) and more importantly is only the net result of many different forces (macroeconomics etc.) so it will generally be hard to say the price is going up because of reason X or Y.
Nope. We don't want a new 1% to control things.
Then tell me how things are controlled, because it is always controlled somehow.
It's not. That's the whole point.
You mean decisions just get made randomly?
No. Humans don't act randomly.
Then there is a way things work, thus certain groups exert control.  
No. Just individuals working together for their own personal purposes. That's why we are still above 1200 even after the etf mess. If bitcoin had some kind of central authority it would not be worth nearly as much. Individual self-interest is and has always been the key.
Yes, it is voluntary and selfserving.  Indeed there is no central authority.  That does not mean that there aren't any groups that exert some control over the workings of bitcoin though.  The good thing is that the power is divided over many actors, but that doesn't mean that there is no power.  Or would you say that what mining pool operators do doesn't affect you.

I am getting away from my initial point though.  The question at hand was not to let a group control bitcoin, it was to find a way to measure the opinion of users/holders  (as a source of information for developers, miners, exchanges,merchants and other users/hodlers).



968. Post 18188164 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.05h):

Quote from: Ibian on March 14, 2017, 07:31:53 PM
I think some sort of voting system based on BTC holdings is sorely needed for coordinating development.
Buying and selling can only be done after a decision has been made, only brings 1d information (up or down, a little or much) and more importantly is only the net result of many different forces (macroeconomics etc.) so it will generally be hard to say the price is going up because of reason X or Y.
Nope. We don't want a new 1% to control things.
Then tell me how things are controlled, because it is always controlled somehow.
It's not. That's the whole point.
You mean decisions just get made randomly?
No. Humans don't act randomly.
Then there is a way things work, thus certain groups exert control.  
No. Just individuals working together for their own personal purposes. That's why we are still above 1200 even after the etf mess. If bitcoin had some kind of central authority it would not be worth nearly as much. Individual self-interest is and has always been the key.
Yes, it is voluntary and selfserving.  Indeed there is no central authority.  That does not mean that there aren't any groups that exert some control over the workings of bitcoin though.  The good thing is that the power is divided over many actors, but that doesn't mean that there is no power.  Or would you say that what mining pool operators do doesn't affect you

I am getting away from my initial point though.  The question at hand was not to let a group control bitcoin, it was to find a way to measure the opinion of users/holders  (as a source of information for developers, miners, exchanges,merchants and other users/hodlers).
Thousands of individuals working independently is not "a group".
Ok, semantics then.  You were talking about a small number of people?



969. Post 18194107 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: Elwar on March 14, 2017, 06:49:23 PM
I think some sort of voting system based on BTC holdings is sorely needed for coordinating development.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETCP8NeXasY

Wink
Does anonymous voting here mean not linked to your ID or unlinked from your public key?



970. Post 18209644 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: d5000 on March 16, 2017, 08:54:24 AM
But I think you are not taking into account that if they go from dash to btc and then into fiat that's a zero sum. I mean, if during a week ALL of dash went to btc and then into fiat, the end result would be no change in BTC price (not for the usage of BTC as a way out to fiat).

I don't think so, because the trade that would have influenced BTC/USD in a positive way has already been concluded when the user bought BTC for USD to buy Dash. The Dash/BTC trade does not really affect BTC/USD. The "cycle" of a "random Dash bubble speculator" could be described as follows:

1) User buys BTC for USD (before the Dash bubble).
Impact on BTC/USD: Positive. Impact on BTC/Dash: None.
2) User buys Dash for BTC (before the Dash bubble).
Impact on BTC/USD: Almost none.* Impact on BTC/Dash: Negative (Bitcoin going down, Dash up)
3) User sells Dash for BTC (after the Dash bubble).
Impact on BTC/USD: Almost none.* Impact on BTC/Dash: Positive (Bitcoin going up, Dash down)
4) User sells BTC for USD (after the Dash bubble):
Impact on BTC/USD: Negative. Impact on BTC/Dash: None.

We are talking about steps 3 and 4, as 1 and 2 are already realized before the bubble, so the negative impact on the price could be significant.

*There could be a minimal effect because of arbitrage via Dash/USD exchanges. But as BTC/USD market is much more important than BTC/Dash, impact on BTC/USD should be very limited.
Nice and clear write-up.



971. Post 18209722 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: 600watt on March 16, 2017, 06:20:05 AM
edit: civil war needs to stop.
I would love for the civil war to stop, but so far it seems like things keep escalating.... Sad



972. Post 18219548 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.06h):

Quote from: arklan on March 17, 2017, 05:18:48 AM
lemme see if i have this straight - bitcoin core is somehow tied (loosely?) with blockstream, who apparently can't be trusted cause they took bank money. Core wants to implement segwit - allowing, later, blockstream's LN.

on the other hand, we have bitcoin unlimited, who want... well, i'm honestly not sure, but something besides segwit? and LOTS of people here don't trust THAT, parlty due to a recent exposure of a major bug.

or, to sum up - jack shit has been solved regarding scaling in years of arguing.

good job guys.
LN isn't from Blockstream, Drya and Poon came up with it (expanding other people's work).  They don't work for Blockstream.  Blockstream has some people working on LN (2 IIRC), but there are many teams working on a LN implementation (while coordinating with each other so these implementations can communicate with eachother properly.

Claims that bitcoin is being capped to profit from a monopoly on LN usage are also hogwash, since LN is an open-source protocol, just like bitcoin.



973. Post 18314389 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Looking bearish



974. Post 18314614 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: BDO_44 on March 24, 2017, 10:25:08 AM
100% there will be dump, below 900$
Mmm, if everybody starts agreeing with me, I might have to reconsider  Huh     Wink



975. Post 18314990 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Cassius on March 24, 2017, 10:53:59 AM
100% there will be dump, below 900$
Mmm, if everybody starts agreeing with me, I might have to reconsider  Huh     Wink
No trust yourself. The law of the 3 dead cat bounces always works.

Yes, correct.
It always works except in those cases when it doesn't.
You are so wise. You must understand the casus fully. You are the real expert here.

Ok, kids. Cards on the table. Where is the bottom? Or where's the next move up to if there's no dump?
Specifics, please. Then it will be clear who was right and who was wrong after the fact.

I am calling 750-ish as intermediate bottom, 500-ish as final bottom.  Hopefully people come to their senses by then.



976. Post 18315164 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Miz4r on March 24, 2017, 11:18:57 AM
Looks like Litecoin is on its way to activate SegWit, almost at 50% now for the last 8064 blocks. The market also seems to like it. Bitcoin next? Smiley
Only 22% in the last 500 blocks, except for a new player, pools don't seem to have switched.



977. Post 18315970 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Miz4r on March 24, 2017, 12:41:15 PM
In other news, Bitcoin share of Crypto market cap now 68%

It's not the ETF, it's the civil war.  Sad to say but BTC needs to sort it's shit out one way or another, or it's still looking a risky buy.

Yeah investors clearly don't like this situation, especially with BU now calling to attack Bitcoin Core miners before a fork happens to force them to upgrade. Not going to work of course but this kind of hostile behavior is definitely making people flee to fiat or other alts now. I think we'll be seeing even lower prices until this has been resolved.
Imagine being new to bitcoin, wanting to figure out more about it to see if it is an interesting investment.
So you visit Reddit and you get : "Judas ... Attack... Malicious Miners... Censorship...paid shill... Tyrant...Pumper....Idiots...".
Yeah, I wouldn't touch that community with a barge pole...



978. Post 18326794 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on March 25, 2017, 10:37:45 AM
*Edit: I bought back like 80% of my coins


Ok, that was original  Grin



979. Post 18326847 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: kurious on March 25, 2017, 10:19:01 AM
But let's flip your stupid assertion on its head. Isn't it a problem that one angry chinese miner and one high powered enthusiast on the autism specter can bring Bitcoin to its knees? Why is that? Why is Bitcoin so weak?
A lot of bitcoin haters joined forces to make it look weak. Those are different groups with different agendas. They would hate to see segwit, LN and side chains implemented. Every fucking altcoin can be implemented as a bitcoin side chain without any risk to consumers! But that is the last thing banks would like to see. So they pump the alts they've chosen to distract average Joe from further converting his savings into bitcoins. The alt is not dangerous for banks. They can kill it anytime just by dumping it. 99% of altcoin investors are just desperado gamblers that don't really care about smart contracts or whatever.

Do you really think the BU crowd, the banks, Roger Ver and some Chinese dark forces all sat around a table together and conspired to bring Bitcoin down?

I know this is the internet age and anyone can believe anything - but the problem is simple. Bitcoin is at war with itself, unable to change to deliver a solution to a real problem and lacking leadership, and direction.

It has issues and no solution is apparent.  There is no conspiracy of dumpers, just people who worry and sell coins because of this uncertainty.  It is rational behaviour to sell when the price is not looking realistic.

That is all.  I am a Bitcoin fan.
Agreed, although I wouldn't say that we need leadership but rather a more clear mechanism of decision making.



980. Post 18327619 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: ImI on March 25, 2017, 11:06:15 AM
Do you really think the BU crowd, the banks, Roger Ver and some Chinese dark forces all sat around a table together and conspired to bring Bitcoin down?

I know this is the internet age and anyone can believe anything - but the problem is simple. Bitcoin is at war with itself, unable to change to deliver a solution to a real problem and lacking leadership, and direction.

It has issues and no solution is apparent.  There is no conspiracy of dumpers, just people who worry and sell coins because of this uncertainty.  It is rational behaviour to sell when the price is not looking realistic.

That is all.  I am a Bitcoin fan.
Agreed, although I wouldn't say that we need leadership but rather a more clear mechanism of decision making.

1 BTC = 1 VOTE
To me, this seems like the most obvious solution, or at least part of the solution.



981. Post 18328283 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: kurious on March 25, 2017, 11:44:02 AM
I didn't mean centralised control, I just think the debate level is entrenched and hostile - all I see is is purile bickering.  What mechanism we can have for decisions is difficult to envisage.  Surely the default is the Core team - I have a feeling they could have done things better,or we wouldn't be here.  I don't think too many people disagree we have scaling issues, so starting from there, how did we get to this shitstorm?
In a community as large as that of bitcoin, there will always be many different opinions.  I think the constant bickering is a consequence of the fact that there is no mechanism of conflict resolution.

As for the default being Core: I certainly don't want to cast aside the value of the technical expertise of the devs.  That's an issue I have with 1 BTC = 1 vote (or rather 1 Satoshi = 1 vote).  However, putting all decision power in the hands of the devs is giving them an enormous amount of responsibility and power.  And while I think they have thus far been acting in good faith and for the benefit of bitcoin, I think much of the current conflict is because a significant part of the community has an issue with the amount of decision power a relatively small group of people have.



982. Post 18328457 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: K~Ehleyr on March 25, 2017, 12:40:24 PM
The problem is the total inability for Bitcoin to reach any sort of consensus.
What matters is that it is resolved one way or another.  The lack of governance is the real problem, only compounded by the refusal of so many to even acknowledge that there is a problem at all.

As others have said here before me, what makes this crash so difficult to stomach isn't the falling price.  We've all seen bitcoin win all sorts of challenges before.  What makes this one so disturbing is that the threat is on the inside, bitcoin's lack of governance, lack of ability to say "this is a problem and this is how we're going to fix it" is actually tearing it apart from the inside.  I'd rather see bitcoin drop to $200 because of China or the US government than to $900 because of infighting.  At least then I'd have some confidence that it would come through, but Bitcoin can only win through if it's in good fighting form and right now it isn't.
Exactly. By the way, I also find it disturbing that some people claim everything is peachy.  Cognitive dissonance much?



983. Post 18329483 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: STT on March 25, 2017, 02:49:04 PM
The problem is the total inability for Bitcoin to reach any sort of consensus.
What matters is that it is resolved one way or another.  The lack of governance is the real problem, only compounded by the refusal of so many to even acknowledge that there is a problem at all.

As others have said here before me, what makes this crash so difficult to stomach isn't the falling price.  We've all seen bitcoin win all sorts of challenges before.  What makes this one so disturbing is that the threat is on the inside, bitcoin's lack of governance, lack of ability to say "this is a problem and this is how we're going to fix it" is actually tearing it apart from the inside.  I'd rather see bitcoin drop to $200 because of China or the US government than to $900 because of infighting.  At least then I'd have some confidence that it would come through, but Bitcoin can only win through if it's in good fighting form and right now it isn't.
Exactly. By the way, I also find it disturbing that some people claim everything is peachy.  Cognitive dissonance much?

People said this ages ago when MtGox went down.  If only it was locked down and all regulated by government, wouldnt that be perfect then.   It would not then be bitcoin really.   The government has already gifted you a virtual digital token currency and its called dollars.     Enjoy that awesome system of exchange if you like overly powerful centralised regulation or in the case of China dictatorship and command economy communism.  

Let bitcoin be more about competitive capitalism which in my life time has not existed in any national currency I've held.   I want to see if this can be a productive enterprise or not, I dont wish for the day government shuts it all down.  I can already see the mess of lopsided politics influencing economies, it appears negative to me.  

Bitcoin needs to be above 900 to maintain the highs of January as a base for further rises.   This roughly matches a 61.8% retracement of year start high to low and could relate to longterm uptrend since summer 2015
1) I never said anything like that when Mt.Gox went down. 
2) Who is talking about moving to government regulation?



984. Post 18332228 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: Holliday on March 25, 2017, 07:44:20 PM
segwit nearly at 30% now.
only 30% is not voting for either BU or segwit.
imo we should just HF a new rule that says miners MUST be signaling for either BU or segwit
whoever ends up with >51% == winner
losers just deal with it and fallow suit.

Why do we need a winner? Why does anyone have to follow suit?

Why is voting for the status quo wrong? The people who want the status quo aren't allowed to have an opinion?

If the network was truly divided 51%/49%, wouldn't it be better for everyone if these two sides just went their separate ways instead of having a large minority of pissed off people?

Why should we turn monetary freedom into mob rule?
While I think yours is the opinion of a minority of bitcoiners, I think this sentiment is nevertheless present in a significant amount of people, especially quite early adopters and more "hardcore" bitcoiners.
The problem I have with this stance is that it assumes that bitcoin will always be the default choice for hard currency, that it won't be outcompeted because its history and network effect will remain sufficient despite​ the network being unable to scale further from the current relatively minor userbase when other currencies might reach networks able to process transactions for all of humanity.

Don't get me wrong, I want bitcoin to be a safe and reliable currency, I am not in the "move fast and break stuff" crowd.  However, a complete inability to evolve will result in being outcompeted I think.



985. Post 18332525 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.07h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on March 25, 2017, 08:44:21 PM
Main thing for me is, in the end I want only one coin. This talk of 2 chains is ridiculous.

2 coins would at least put an end for good to this endless drama.
The market will sort out the good coins from the bad ones.

I don't think there will ever be enough consensus for a fork. However, if there is one then doesn't it mean all Bitcoin holders can double their money, provided the price stays the same?

If we keep coins on one chain we can choose to sell the coins on the other forked chain. That way we get to keep our stash and get a shitload of cash too.
Except of course the price won't stay the same.



986. Post 18584148 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.08h):

Quote from: Ted E. Bare on April 14, 2017, 09:31:19 AM
These days every exchange has its own price. Weird.
Yeah, they are going all over the place.



987. Post 19034819 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.09h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on May 15, 2017, 04:15:38 PM
Lucky idiot is how I imagine the majority of people who have gotten rich off of Bitcoin. Maybe I'm just jealous, but I think there's a bit of truth to it.

What about the people who carefully researched Bitcoin when it was worth pennies or single or double digits of dollars, who saw its potential as a disruptive technology, invested their hard earned money in mining equipment, mined and bought Bitcoin and then steadfastly held on to their coins?

Do you think they're "lucky idiots"?

I think the lucky ones are those who bought coins because others had already made money on them and then made money despite gambling with them through trading.
I think there is a spectrum between people who thought long and hard about every possible angle of bitcoin and those that were convinced by a catchy phrase.  The latter could just as easily have fallen for a pennystock pump and dump, the former is a sophisticated and perhaps even visionary investor.  I guess most of us are somewhere in between. 



988. Post 19079775 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Lauda on May 18, 2017, 12:29:40 PM
Really, increasing the block size seems to have no drawbacks to me.
Then you do not understand anything. Let's start with the crucial one:
1) DoS attack vector due to quadratic validation time O(n^2) at 2 MB. You are able to construct a transaction/block that takes longer than 10 minutes to validate, essentially preventing others from catching-up to you.
2) Increased orphan rates.
3) Increased node centralization/decreased node count.
4) Increased mining centralization (direct effect of the 2 above).
5) Risk of chain-split.

There's probably more, but these are the first ones that come into mind.

Just keep the blocksize the same.
Explain.
You can scale Bitcoin to a fair extent without modifying the block size. Segwit -> Schnorr + Signature aggregation -> LN/sidechains/TumbleBit/Mimblewimble.

Nice summary



989. Post 19108701 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: Elwar on May 20, 2017, 05:40:27 AM
2 k.
One of the best weekends ever Smiley

Porsche or ferrari? Cheesy

Strangely enough, as high as bitcoin goes I still look for a reasonable car under $5k that will last a few years with low maintenance.

Though I spent more than that in the last week on a vacation.

It's funny how decision making with money works sometimes​.  I also noticed that I am inconsistent: penny-wise and pound-foolish.



990. Post 19109523 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.10h):

Quote from: HI-TEC99 on May 20, 2017, 11:34:45 AM
2 k.
One of the best weekends ever Smiley

Porsche or ferrari? Cheesy

Strangely enough, as high as bitcoin goes I still look for a reasonable car under $5k that will last a few years with low maintenance.

Though I spent more than that in the last week on a vacation.

It's funny how decision making with money works sometimes​.  I also noticed that I am inconsistent: penny-wise and pound-foolish.

I try to be as tight fisted as possible on real world things, and throw everything I can at Bitcoin. This cartoon sums it up.


so true!



991. Post 19259135 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: yefi on May 29, 2017, 12:59:16 AM
I hope that Segwit+2MB gets enough support to finally end this absurd war. At this time it looks as the only non contentious alternative. I don't like the idea of non unanimous hard forks, nor UASF. Whatever is supported by an almost unanimous majority is ok to me at this time (Well, except BU/EC as I am totally against it).

Seemed like a decent compromise to me. Core programmers snubbing it was disappointing.
Agreed, the total lack of ability to make a compromise, even one that doesn't seem to have big drawbacks is disappointing.



992. Post 19340069 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.11h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on June 02, 2017, 09:30:43 PM
My best buddy has been talking to me about investing £5k into some company and expects a return of £45k in 5 years. He's telling me his friend has invested £10k and another a further £5k.

I was talking to him in mid 2013 about bitcoin and he didn't give a shit!! He's now telling me about these massive gains etc from this company and it's forecast to do this and that blah blah.

Now I like to diversify but these gains in % sound great but it's nothing compared to what we have gained in bitcoin. I am also worried he hasn't researched enough in to this company (what ever it may be).

He's so excited but I was trying to get him excited about bitcoin 4 years ago and he didn't care.

He's now preaching about these POTENTIAL future gains his other buddy has been telling him about and he's going to get.

I found it very hard to listen to him.

I wish him luck and I am sure he will profit but why he's so keen on this and shot me down in flames years ago is beyond me.

Maybe I am no salesman
If his main focus is on how much profit this is going give, and how others are investing (and perhaps on how much money they have already made) instead of what added value this company is bringing, that would be a red flag for me.



993. Post 19391295 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on June 06, 2017, 06:07:44 AM
I give up. Cheesy
For what it is worth, I don't think you are NLC at all Wink .



994. Post 19427336 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

30M ask order on okex  Shocked



995. Post 19463557 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on June 09, 2017, 07:32:09 PM
Bro, I've been in BTC longer than that chart... if it was truly parabolic my $50K investment in bitcoin wouldve made me a millionaire, not a lame thousand-air

This is slow steady growth, which I'm not complain about at all, I love it actually. But people are claiming that we are due for a huge crash... I mean what?? We haven't even had much fun yet! At least give me dat parabolic move BEFORE we crash and do a 50% retrace

I've only been into Bitcoin since it had just finally broken out of single digits for good but if you look back to when it was worth less than a penny per coin you'll see that its growth has indeed been and still is parabolic. To really see it, look at the log chart for the last 7 years.

Sure, there was that anomaly back in 2014-5  when it dipped below the ascending line. Look at the log chart before or after that anomaly and you'll see they're both rising at a parabolic rate. That'd why I chose a chart starting in summer of 2015.

If you'd bought in 2012 or early 2013, your $50k investment would have already made you a multi-millionaire.
Parabolic != Exponential



996. Post 19475465 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Looking mighty bullish  Grin



997. Post 19496155 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

BTC breakout biatches  Grin



998. Post 19532123 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: yefi on June 13, 2017, 03:04:22 AM
This looks like it could be the end of the rally to me, tbh.
Yeah, the fact that we didn't break out when the chart looked so bullish is making me think the party could be over as well.



999. Post 19574537 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.12h):

Quote from: kludzins on June 15, 2017, 06:32:26 AM
Bubble has most probably popped. Get ready for a global crypto bear market.

Yeah so BIG bitcoin bubble



It's all about perspective Wink
How up to date is this thing?



1000. Post 19666842 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.13h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on June 20, 2017, 08:38:51 AM
to clarify last night's discussion:
...
I'm going to call it now, segwit2x will be responsible for activating segwit at last due to overwhelming miner support, BUT great thanks to James Hilliard for introducing them to BIP91 which makes segwit2x compatible with the other segwit activations.

Watch this for the very rapid rise in segwit2x support that will happen fast now:
https://coin.dance/blocks

Segwit may well get a miner activated soft fork before BIP148's UASF which remains in limbo in terms of meaningful support but seems to have had the desired effect of forcing miners' hands in one way or another.

What happens after segwit though is a mystery, but there is enough miner hashrate support for 2MB that it might happen too.
very lolworthy that Hilliard is 1. a core dev. 2. works for 'bitmainwarranty' (not bitmain but still!)
but 3. wrote this bip91 to tie segwit in, to 'both' parties' satisfaction
miners' signalling has for the moment no real effect. the date to watch is 16 July.
bitmain (viaBTC) may then later hard fork to make this chinacoin, which imnvho may have a little value as an altcoin

so, if there's any correlation to price with all this, sideways for ~4 weeks, then more likely than not blast off

I am a bit out of the loop, what happens July 16?



1001. Post 20193291 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on July 17, 2017, 11:15:08 AM
so AGAIN a proposal

the person closest by new ATH guess to recieve 0.25 BTC  paid direct Wink Wink Wink

come start shooting
September 17 (2017)



1002. Post 20205611 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: becoin on July 18, 2017, 06:48:49 AM
John McAfee is taking bets:

Quote
In the long term Bitcoin moves above  $500,000 within three years. Bets?

https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/887012614131372032

Send legal contract bet to:
John McAfee
98 Scott Street. Lexington, TN. 38351


I would definitely take a $500k bet knowing that in 3 years I can sell one of my bitcoins for $500k to pay off the bet happily. Or he gives me $500k. Win win.


Well, the problem is nobody knows what $500k can buy you after 3 years!


Not sure if trolling or lost his marbles.



1003. Post 20211418 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Torque on July 18, 2017, 12:11:37 PM
Notice the rise in Altlandia.

This was primarily a massive Altlandia bull trap. Crypto personalities on yt are going nuts, doubling down with both hands.

They're gonna get burned again.
yt = YouTube?



1004. Post 20256504 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Nice jump upwards.



1005. Post 20257289 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Ethereum getting hacked, bitcoin getting Segwit, looking good...
I feel comfortable enough in my current position that I am not going to buy in extra.   This lack of greed is probably a good indication that we will actually jump higher still.



1006. Post 20257353 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Wow, coiled rocket snake train taking off  Grin



1007. Post 20259335 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on July 20, 2017, 12:19:03 PM
Ethereum getting hacked, bitcoin getting Segwit, looking good...
I feel comfortable enough in my current position that I am not going to buy in extra.   This lack of greed is probably a good indication that we will actually jump higher still.
Note to self: next time just buy in...



1008. Post 20261822 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Slush is onboard.



1009. Post 20261868 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Torque on July 20, 2017, 03:33:59 PM
Just remember kids, never in Bitcoin's history has there been a double top where the second top went higher than the first.

Because if it went higher, it wouldn't be a double top?  Undecided Huh



1010. Post 20263437 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: Torque on July 20, 2017, 04:33:19 PM
Just remember kids, never in Bitcoin's history has there been a double top where the second top went higher than the first.

Because if it went higher, it wouldn't be a double top?  Undecided Huh

So what, you think that after 5 weeks of constant down and this dip to 1830 was the "first selloff" of a much larger, protracted bull run? And that $100B is just sitting on the sidelines waiting for SegWit2X approval so they can come pouring in and run this thing up to $5000+ by EOY?

Really? That would be a nice dream. That's exactly what people thought in 2013 too, after the first crash and bounce back up to ~$980.

I don't really care... I'm hedged with a huge future stash, as well as a good amount of fiat to buy more at the very bottom, so I win either way it goes.

But I'll go on record right now saying that I think $2980 was this year's top. And that by Feb. 2018, I think we'll see around the ~$1600 mark.

No, 2980 having been the top is definitively a scenario that I am taking into account.  

I just thought the terminology was phrased weirdly.  It just seems to me that a double top where the second top goes higher than the first is a contradiction in itself (I can be pedantic at times  Smiley ).



1011. Post 20329364 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: bitserve on July 23, 2017, 04:47:23 PM
spread some more good quality FUD, i need cheep coins to buy Smiley

We are all going to die... sometime.
Not necessarily... http://www.sens.org/research/introduction-to-sens-research



1012. Post 20342671 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.14h):

Quote from: jbreher on July 24, 2017, 06:42:30 AM
I can certainly agree with the bolded sentence. And we don't know the level of support and consensus until the experiment is run. Fact is, in roughly coterminous timeframes, all Bitcoiners will be forced to choose between: Change A to Bitcoin; or Change B to Bitcoin. No option for Unchanged Bitcoin. So get off your high horse. If one is an alt before the fact, then so is the other.

Cheers!
Is there going to be a BCC fork no matter what conditions?  I heard some people say that it would only be if UASF split off or something?  I am a bit out of the loop.



1013. Post 20366968 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: luckygenough56 on July 25, 2017, 08:09:32 AM
bitcoin cash is quite nice

segwit seems like a trojan horse to me and i don't like the idea of off-chain txs (lightning network)
off-chain is a misnomer for LN



1014. Post 20389892 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Torque on July 26, 2017, 02:00:06 AM
Wut? No free cash, Bitcoin Cash Plus will be the REAL Bitcoin Cash! *

* As satoshi intended. Haven't you read the whitepaper? blah blah?
Nah, that“s a shitcoin. The truly gem is Bitcoin Cash Plus Classic

Those all shit coin.

Bitcoin Super cash Plus will rule all.

Bitcoin Unlimited Infinity Cash Token Plus 9000TM

It'll have 64 TB blocks. Transactions will be so fast they'll go back in time. Top that bitchez!
My Bitcoin Quantum Mysterium will feature direct b2b (brain to brain) payment channels based on bleeding edge Quantum Entanglement Technology. It will allow for new features such as instantly paying another for his thoughts, or outsourcing hard questions (such as: "how is this new technology going to work in practice"?).  



1015. Post 20440592 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: lemmyK on July 28, 2017, 12:08:14 AM
Bitcoin, like any so-called crypto currency, is the old like world scheme of Ponzi. Only in the new high-tech pack.

Want an example? You are welcome:

1. Assume that all people in the world convert half of their savings from ordinary national currencies to crypto-currencies. What does it mean? This means that the producers of crypto-currency, received half of the world's volume of national currencies - half of the total world currency bascet.

2. After a while, the fictitious value of investments in crypto-currencies increased 4-fold (as we see in the case of Bitcoin and the mass of other crypto-currencies). What does it mean? This means that now, every person in the world, reasonably expects to receive in exchange for his crypto currency (as a return on his genius) in 4 times more volume of the national currency.

3. Let's assume that all these people, at the same time, decide to fixed their investment profit-to exchange their crypto-currencies that went up four times, (if they take profit in the form ordinary national currencies).
All of them expect to receive now 4 times more national currency than they used to, they spent on buying crypto-currencies.

QUESTION: Where does this whole currency come from? From producers or producers of crypto-currency? But they simply do not have such volumes of ordinary currency, and never were. Because, previously selling the Crypto currency, in exchange for the usual currency, the organizers and the receivers only received the initial value of the crypto currency in the usual currency. Which was at the time of the transaction only - 1/4 of the amount of currency, which is now payable to all owners of the crypto currency.

CONCLUSION: Bitcoin, like any so-called crypto currency, is the old world scheme of Ponzi. Where each participant can receive a gain of the investments only one way - due to those new participants who have entered this pyramid later. Kiss Cheesy

Wow, my mind is blown! Such genius !

Now replace the word crypto with stock market and try to figure out where you went wrong...



1016. Post 20512783 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Just to be sure: the fork is happening shortly after noon (UTC), and not shortly after midnight, correct?



1017. Post 20522395 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.15h):

Quote from: Last of the V8s on July 31, 2017, 06:48:38 PM
Those of you planning to trade the new altcoin for bitcoins, be careful not to harm your privacy in the process.

I, personally, think Bitcoin Cash is an elaborate scheme to link otherwise mindful bitcoiners to all of their addresses.

Take the necessary precautions.

See here for more explanation
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6p5439/bitcoincash_and_chain_analysis/dkxy1pg/

the lack of true fungibility will bite everyone in the arse sooner or later, no need to blame bitcoin cash.

... and there we have it. The first in the much predicted new round of attacks on bitcoin.

'oh that shit ain't fungible, see, so what we really need is a NEW bitcoin, let's call it BitcoinAnonymous', fork off from ghastly corecoin and rule the world ... anybody?'

No, fuck off, it's fungible and there's no taint or title in bitcoin.
I think most people agree fungibility is an issue in bitcoin. IIRC, the vast majority (if not all) of Core does as well.  That doesn't mean this won't become a hotly debated issue,  probably a lot more contentious than smallblocks versus bigblocks.  The longer we wait, the more "normies" and less "revolutionaries" will be involved in crypto, and the more contentious this becomes.



1018. Post 20562049 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: micalith on August 02, 2017, 10:43:32 AM
all of you who are frustratedly waiting to get your BCH deposited are lucky. I took the risk of keeping my Bitcoin on Kraken and Coinfloor, so was able to dump very happily at 0.07. FFS, really kicking myself now!
Trust me, you could have done much worse.  Like, not getting any BCH coins because you f@cked up completely out of some sort of confused negligence....



1019. Post 20597561 (copy this link) (by Spaceman_Spiff) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_15.16h):

Quote from: El duderino_ on August 03, 2017, 07:26:32 PM
Based on what are Guy's voting price to go under 2000$ only one direction after this event UP UP UP

I have to say I am surprised about the price action. Segwit lock-in rally?