All posts made by Rampion in Bitcointalk.org's Wall Observer thread



1. Post 1928583 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

This is quite scary. Let's analyze the facts:


I think this rally needs to be supported by REAL news that improve the fundamentals, otherwise it will be just a trap before a slow decline.

IMHO, the best news would be a new company offering unlimited amounts of BTC for cash immediately - buying your first BTC is still slow and painful, and the first one changing that fact will really boost BTC.



2. Post 1928626 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Another worrying fact: market is still very illiquid, another panic sell of 500kBTCish would take us back to $40ish. And you know we had a 600KBTC dump just 8 days ago.

Quote from: Rampion on April 24, 2013, 08:22:17 AM
This is quite scary. Let's analyze the facts:


I think this rally needs to be supported by REAL news that improve the fundamentals, otherwise it will be just a trap before a slow decline.

IMHO, the best news would be a new company offering unlimited amounts of BTC for cash immediately - buying your first BTC is still slow and painful, and the first one changing that fact will really boost BTC.



3. Post 1928690 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: NamelessOne on April 24, 2013, 08:34:19 AM
This is quite scary. Let's analyze the facts:

  • the interest in bitcoin is fading out after the crash, just check the google trend: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin&date=today%203-m&cmpt=q
  • there's still a lot of money at Gox, a lot of fresh money was delayed because of their epic queue, but you can bet that from now on the flow of fresh money will be slower (just check the google trend)

I think this rally needs to be supported by REAL news that improve the fundamentals, otherwise it will be just a trap before a slow decline.

IMHO, the best news would be a new company offering unlimited amounts of BTC for cash immediately - buying your first BTC is still slow and painful, and the first one changing that fact will really boost BTC.
The google thing isn't all that surprising. People saw the price drop and lost their excitement. It'll come back eventually and many will have missed the train.

Well, people loosing their excitement is a fact; people coming back massively after a "cool down" and a growth in fundamentals (more bitcoin businesses, etc.) is also very probable.

But this does not invalidate the fact that this short term rally seems unsustainable and a trap. Investors who were delayed by the queue at Gox and got their money in after the crash (we are speaking about MILLIONS of $ and many thousands of individuals) are not going to be in the mood for "buy and hold" like at the beginning of the bubble.

Again, the market is so illiquid that a big dump can take us all the way back to $50ish in the blink of an eye. And I don't see the enthusiasm to prevent that from happening.



4. Post 1928761 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: oakpacific on April 24, 2013, 08:46:22 AM
This is quite scary. Let's analyze the facts:

  • the interest in bitcoin is fading out after the crash, just check the google trend: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin&date=today%203-m&cmpt=q
  • there's still a lot of money at Gox, a lot of fresh money was delayed because of their epic queue, but you can bet that from now on the flow of fresh money will be slower (just check the google trend)

I think this rally needs to be supported by REAL news that improve the fundamentals, otherwise it will be just a trap before a slow decline.

IMHO, the best news would be a new company offering unlimited amounts of BTC for cash immediately - buying your first BTC is still slow and painful, and the first one changing that fact will really boost BTC.
The google thing isn't all that surprising. People saw the price drop and lost their excitement. It'll come back eventually and many will have missed the train.

Well, people loosing their excitement is a fact; people coming back massively after a "cool down" and a growth in fundamentals (more bitcoin businesses, etc.) is also very probable.

But this does not invalidate the fact that this short term rally seems unsustainable and a trap. Investors who were delayed by the queue at Gox and got their money in after the crash (we are speaking about MILLIONS of $ and many thousands of individuals) are not going to be in the mood for "buy and hold" like at the beginning of the bubble.

Again, the market is so illiquid that a big dump can take us all the way back to $50ish in the blink of an eye. And I don't see the enthusiasm to prevent that from happening.

In the blink of an eye and then get really scared when you find out you just sold at $50 and the bids don't nudge.

200 million dollars were spent on buying at $50-$100, that's about enough confidence I will need, and bears don't have a magic infinitely deep pocket, there are only so many bitcoins for sale.

That's true. What scares me is what will happen when those who bought at $80ish to $100ish are going to cash out at $160 to $200. As I said earlier, the feeling is not any more "buy and hold" (which lead to parabolic growth), people is much more cautious now.



5. Post 1928811 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Sword Smith on April 24, 2013, 08:42:55 AM
This is quite scary. Let's analyze the facts:

  • the interest in bitcoin is fading out after the crash, just check the google trend: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin&date=today%203-m&cmpt=q
  • there's still a lot of money at Gox, a lot of fresh money was delayed because of their epic queue, but you can bet that from now on the flow of fresh money will be slower (just check the google trend)

I think this rally needs to be supported by REAL news that improve the fundamentals, otherwise it will be just a trap before a slow decline.

IMHO, the best news would be a new company offering unlimited amounts of BTC for cash immediately - buying your first BTC is still slow and painful, and the first one changing that fact will really boost BTC.
I am fairly convinced that the causality is the opposite of what you describe. Sure, price and number of Google searches are correlated but correlation does not imply causation. It is rising prices that drive interest, not the other way around.

Sure, what leads to exponential growth in investors base is the price rise, and there is where it starts the bubble kind of growth, but what drives the price higher in first place is real growth in BTC economy (real businesses, etc.), which increases the demand of BTC for non-speculative matters, thus boosting positive media attention and attracting tons of speculative investors....

Is like a circle...



6. Post 1928874 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: oakpacific on April 24, 2013, 09:01:33 AM
This is quite scary. Let's analyze the facts:

  • the interest in bitcoin is fading out after the crash, just check the google trend: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin&date=today%203-m&cmpt=q
  • there's still a lot of money at Gox, a lot of fresh money was delayed because of their epic queue, but you can bet that from now on the flow of fresh money will be slower (just check the google trend)

I think this rally needs to be supported by REAL news that improve the fundamentals, otherwise it will be just a trap before a slow decline.

IMHO, the best news would be a new company offering unlimited amounts of BTC for cash immediately - buying your first BTC is still slow and painful, and the first one changing that fact will really boost BTC.
The google thing isn't all that surprising. People saw the price drop and lost their excitement. It'll come back eventually and many will have missed the train.

Well, people loosing their excitement is a fact; people coming back massively after a "cool down" and a growth in fundamentals (more bitcoin businesses, etc.) is also very probable.

But this does not invalidate the fact that this short term rally seems unsustainable and a trap. Investors who were delayed by the queue at Gox and got their money in after the crash (we are speaking about MILLIONS of $ and many thousands of individuals) are not going to be in the mood for "buy and hold" like at the beginning of the bubble.

Again, the market is so illiquid that a big dump can take us all the way back to $50ish in the blink of an eye. And I don't see the enthusiasm to prevent that from happening.

In the blink of an eye and then get really scared when you find out you just sold at $50 and the bids don't nudge.

200 million dollars were spent on buying at $50-$100, that's about enough confidence I will need, and bears don't have a magic infinitely deep pocket, there are only so many bitcoins for sale.

That's true. What scares me is what will happen when those who bought at $80ish to $100ish are going to cash out at $160 to $200. As I said earlier, the feeling is not any more "buy and hold" (which lead to parabolic growth), people is much more cautious now.

If you are cautious, then I suspect you will not panic so easily and sell on a slight change of the wind direction, right? While smart investors usually initiate a crash, it has to be the panic sellers who execute them, no crash can happen without panic sellers, and they hardly buy back cheaper, else everybody will be a winner, so when they sold out they are out. I think even if the price moves down this time, it will be considerably less violent. The next panic sell will have to wait until after another crazy buying spree when irrational buyers put in what they can't afford to lose.

Another thing is: the crash was only so crazy thanks to the characteristics of Bitcoin itself:the whole global stock can be moved to the exchanges for sale in a matter of hours, which is unprecedented, so bears won the first move, but after they get their fiats they will have to deal with the reality of the banking system:you can only move so much in a day, so what will happen when they wait impatiently while watching the price slowly rebounds? Hmmm....

That's true. The system is fucked up also because it is so difficult to "cash out" a significant amount of money. Have you ever tried to cash out something above $500k from Gox? You can bet it is a fucking pain in the ass. Big commissions, painfully slow verification process (notarization, apostille, huge queue, etc.) and HUGE DELAY in processing withdrawals. When you made $500k from your $20k investment you are not used to move that amount of money, thus you get nervous when you see your money is stuck for 20/25 days at a Japanese company run by a guy in his 20s, constantly hit by DDoS and apparently unable to manage their own growth.

For serious money (i mean serious money) to enter BTC we need much more reliable infrastructure.



7. Post 1928909 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: oakpacific on April 24, 2013, 09:11:46 AM
That's true. The system is fucked up also because it is so difficult to "cash out" a significant amount of money. Have you ever tried to cash out something above $500k from Gox? You can bet it is a fucking pain in the ass. Big commissions, painfully slow verification process (notarization, apostille, huge queue, etc.) and HUGE DELAY in processing withdrawals. When you made $500k from your $20k investment you are not used to move that amount of money, thus you get nervous when you see your money is stuck for 20/25 days at a Japanese company run by a guy in his 20s, constantly hit by DDoS and apparently unable to manage their own growth.

For serious money (i mean serious money) to enter BTC we need much more reliable infrastructure.

It's not just the problem of Gox, every bank wants to restrict you when it comes to withdrawal of money, they usually only keep the minimum amount of reserve required so it will always be a PITA.

Well, that's true if you want CASH from your bank - but when you are moving "electronic" money from one account/bank to another you don't need more than 2/3 business days, many times with 1 day is enough, and its very unlikely your money will never go through. With Gox you may have to wait for almost a month with your withdrawal on "processing", and the fear the money will never come out because of hack, shut down by law enforcement, scam, whatever, is high.



8. Post 1928913 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: NamelessOne on April 24, 2013, 09:04:54 AM
Also, the google chart really has searches falling back to end of March, early April levels which really isn't all the bad. It is vastly higher than it has been any other time than June 2011.  Cheesy

That is today. If the downtrend in interest continues, in 2 weeks we will be at December 2012 interest levels.



9. Post 1928972 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 24, 2013, 09:06:31 AM
This is quite scary. Let's analyze the facts:

  • the interest in bitcoin is fading out after the crash, just check the google trend: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoin&date=today%203-m&cmpt=q
  • there's still a lot of money at Gox, a lot of fresh money was delayed because of their epic queue, but you can bet that from now on the flow of fresh money will be slower (just check the google trend)

I think this rally needs to be supported by REAL news that improve the fundamentals, otherwise it will be just a trap before a slow decline.

IMHO, the best news would be a new company offering unlimited amounts of BTC for cash immediately - buying your first BTC is still slow and painful, and the first one changing that fact will really boost BTC.

I see what you did there - sold 700 coins at 147, and getting itchy about the buyback point not coming yet.

To bail out or not to bail out; that is the question.

Hint: do not bail out, it will crash to the prev. resistance, now support at $130-$135, I am 75% we get there in 24 hours. Relax and let the swing play out.

Let's hope you are correct. Nevertheless, I wouldn't mind a correction to $60ish. My gut feeling is that is a good point for a reasonable and sustainable long term growth, while waiting for: improvements in BTC economy and infrastructures -> positive media attention -> another parabolic growth to ATH

I just don't like this rally after the pop, it feels to me like a trap, and this is confirmed by some indicators while contradicted by others. IMHO in the long term BTC will go up, as there is many people doing great things for BTC and preparing great products and services, but in the very short term I'm puzzled by this rally.

I've read that some the TA folks are calling this a "suckers rally". Hope is not, but I'm much more confident in BTC for the long term than for the short term



10. Post 1928985 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: 100x on April 24, 2013, 09:24:28 AM
Also, the google chart really has searches falling back to end of March, early April levels which really isn't all the bad. It is vastly higher than it has been any other time than June 2011.  Cheesy

That is today. If the downtrend in interest continues, in 2 weeks we will be at December 2012 interest levels.

Your reliance on the google trend for useful information will not serve you well.

Well, until aprox. April 16th its correlation with BTC/USD has been perfect. This is a fact. Since April 16th, we see declining google trend but growing BTC/USD. Let's see how it plays in the mid term.



11. Post 1929146 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 24, 2013, 09:46:48 AM
153!

Short the shit out of this false breakout dudes like a boss! Dont be sheep, sell like a man.

Disclosure: Sold BTC772 at $153.

I'm following you my friend Cheesy



12. Post 1929162 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: sacko on April 24, 2013, 09:55:08 AM

bids dropping - asks dropping faster
could so. explain what this means?

My opinion:

We either have a correction NOW to $130ish, or we break $160 and then ATH is very close



13. Post 1929493 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: wonkytonky on April 24, 2013, 10:53:42 AM
~BTC4k dump

it will go up again...  and if this guy sees price goes up.. he might wanne buy in again or  at least some part of it..
160+ seems possible..

then again.. this is bitcoin! Wink got a stop order way below just in case   
but i have faith in our us friends for now.

And this...  How do you place stop loss order at Gox? It's crazy you cannot do it, anybody investing serious money needs that kind of tools.



14. Post 1929521 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Sitarow on April 24, 2013, 11:02:16 AM
~BTC4k dump

it will go up again...  and if this guy sees price goes up.. he might wanne buy in again or  at least some part of it..
160+ seems possible..

then again.. this is bitcoin! Wink got a stop order way below just in case   
but i have faith in our us friends for now.

And this...  How do you place stop loss order at Gox? It's crazy you cannot do it, anybody investing serious money needs that kind of tools.

cavirtex has that.

Yeah, but came on... Who is Cavirtex? Would you wire them a couple millions?



15. Post 1929671 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: gizmoh on April 24, 2013, 11:28:53 AM
I've turned from short term bear to short term bull, the constant price gains set a mood of regaining confidence, generating buying spree  and hysteria to hop in the bandwagon until the next bubble burst. $200 Roll Eyes here we come!

"Return to normal" Cheesy



16. Post 1933502 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: josiahgarber on April 24, 2013, 06:22:35 PM
According to the mtgox walls, 23 Million USD takes us to a BTC valuation over $1000.  Not a lot of money in the whole scheme of things.

You should know that means nothing.

FACT: according to the order book, someone willing to cash out just 18 Million USD takes us to a BTC valuation in the low single digits. Not a lot of money in the whole scheme of things.

Imagine satoshi decides to cash out the 1MBTC he has, because is time for him to retire. Yes, you know what would happen: BTC would suddenly go to 0. And that will happen, sooner or later, because nobody can wait to be rich forever. Just pray that the market depth will be 10,000 times bigger than now, so we just go to low double digits when he decides to sell, and not straight to 0.



17. Post 1933581 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Sword Smith on April 24, 2013, 06:29:55 PM
According to the mtgox walls, 23 Million USD takes us to a BTC valuation over $1000.  Not a lot of money in the whole scheme of things.

You should know that means nothing.

FACT: according to the order book, someone willing to cash out just 18 Million USD takes us to a BTC valuation in the low single digits. Not a lot of money in the whole scheme of things.

Imagine satoshi decides to cash out the 1MBTC he has, because is time for him to retire. Yes, you know what would happen: BTC would suddenly go to 0. And that will happen, sooner or later, because nobody can wait to be rich forever. Just pray that the market depth will be 10,000 times bigger than now, so we just go to low double digits when he decides to sell, and not straight to 0.
If he is smart enough to invent bitcoins, he is smart enough to sell responsibly. I believe.

Well, I would be more confortable if he would have moved some coins, gradually. He never moved A SINGLE COIN according to the blockchain. Not even at the peak of 2011 bubble, not even at $200 BTC/USD.

Frankly, people sees this as "this guy really believes in BTC potential!", but sometimes that just makes me doubt of his sanity. If he never moved a single coin in all his life, he is very well capable of dumping them suddenly. That's how I see it, and many times I think that he will destroy what he created in that way.

And remember that nobody can wait forever to be filthy rich.

Hope it's just a nightmare tough



18. Post 1933656 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Piper67 on April 24, 2013, 06:41:11 PM
According to the mtgox walls, 23 Million USD takes us to a BTC valuation over $1000.  Not a lot of money in the whole scheme of things.

You should know that means nothing.

FACT: according to the order book, someone willing to cash out just 18 Million USD takes us to a BTC valuation in the low single digits. Not a lot of money in the whole scheme of things.

Imagine satoshi decides to cash out the 1MBTC he has, because is time for him to retire. Yes, you know what would happen: BTC would suddenly go to 0. And that will happen, sooner or later, because nobody can wait to be rich forever. Just pray that the market depth will be 10,000 times bigger than now, so we just go to low double digits when he decides to sell, and not straight to 0.

He's already rich. When he needs fiat for something, he can sell some BTC. If what he wants can be paid for with BTC, he doesn't need to sell them at all.

Talk of cashing out is, once again, just a failure of the imagination.

He never moved a single coin. Not entirely true, he did some test transfer to Hal Finney, but that's it. He/they may be dead, or he/they may be planning to dump his/their stash at once. If not, why Satoshi did not sell coins till now? Why Satoshi did not buy anything with bitcoins? Is all in the blockchain. His coins never moved apart from some well documented transactions to early cooperators.



19. Post 1933692 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: seleme on April 24, 2013, 06:43:05 PM
any link for satoshi's address?

Do you have a single address with your BTC?

https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/the-well-deserved-fortune-of-satoshi-nakamoto/



20. Post 1933715 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: gizmoh on April 24, 2013, 06:45:28 PM
According to the mtgox walls, 23 Million USD takes us to a BTC valuation over $1000.  Not a lot of money in the whole scheme of things.

You should know that means nothing.

FACT: according to the order book, someone willing to cash out just 18 Million USD takes us to a BTC valuation in the low single digits. Not a lot of money in the whole scheme of things.

Imagine satoshi decides to cash out the 1MBTC he has, because is time for him to retire. Yes, you know what would happen: BTC would suddenly go to 0. And that will happen, sooner or later, because nobody can wait to be rich forever. Just pray that the market depth will be 10,000 times bigger than now, so we just go to low double digits when he decides to sell, and not straight to 0.
If he is smart enough to invent bitcoins, he is smart enough to sell responsibly. I believe.

Well, I would be more confortable if he would have moved some coins, gradually. He never moved A SINGLE COIN according to the blockchain. Not even at the peak of 2011 bubble, not even at $200 BTC/USD.

Frankly, people sees this as "this guy really believes in BTC potential!", but sometimes that just makes me doubt of his sanity. If he never moved a single coin in all his life, he is very well capable of dumping them suddenly. That's how I see it, and many times I think that he will destroy what he created in that way.

And remember that nobody can wait forever to be filthy rich.

Hope it's just a nightmare tough

What are his addresses for you to make such affirmations?
since the april 11 crash,there's a regular 3-5k sell order practically everyday,i would believe its satoshi..


Well, you know blockchain is public. There have been many studies about the coins mined early, for which a huge part never moved (more than 60%). The coins never moved where mined in 2009 and 2010, and from pattern analysis looks they are all Satoshi's. Just check one of the many analysis that support this theory: https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/the-well-deserved-fortune-of-satoshi-nakamoto/



21. Post 1939282 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

WTF? Huge lag at Gox?



22. Post 1939632 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on April 25, 2013, 10:35:54 AM
The $160 wall got eaten a few hours ago, no one cares, price is idling around $157-$158.
I'm seriously wondering who is buying these days.

With google and paypal looking to get in...

Very small volume. Very tricky moment to buy in (unless you are in it for the long haul, obviously).

Paypal news were great, but the masses only understand one thing: price is going UP UP UP, price broke ATH, etc. When you have those headlines is when everybody jumps on the train.

We had a very recent bubble burst, so I won't be surprised by a mid-term scenario in which prices slowly decline or just stay stable (which in BTC means 50% to 80% swings, big rallyes and subsequent big crashes, but no more parabolic growth)



23. Post 1940688 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: seleme on April 25, 2013, 01:31:00 PM
some dumps are needed for that, it's still about same number of coins needed for 145 and 165

I will say it again: those numbers on the bid and ask size means nothing. Bids and ask walls vanish as soon as the price moves, the book order changes dynamically and means NOTHING. Just check the book order just before the crash, you will see that there was a HUGE buying pressure, but a single "market order" dump of 69K coins triggered the crash.

Making a long story short: if you believe in "how many coins are need for X price" you are doing a BIG mistake and you don't understand how trading works.



24. Post 1940782 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: RationalSpeculator on April 25, 2013, 01:46:00 PM
... but a single "market order" dump of 69K coins triggered the crash.

How do you know the crash was caused by someone dumping 69k coins at market? Is this a verifiable fact or speculation on your part?

If speculation, why do you believe someone did this?

I don't understand who in their right mind would do such thing?

I mean it's a very poor way to sell a position so large, right? Since you will get serious slippage?

Of course there is a verifiable fact. Just check the "trade history" on bitcoincharts or similar, or follow the "time & sales" on http://bitcoin.clarkmoody.com/. I was trading when that happened, in fact I was very happy because of the unbelievable buying opportunity until Gox fucked up and halted trading to induce "market cooldown". You can check the forums and you will see I was the first one to post about this "market cooldown" Wink

I had to wake up at 4AM to be ready when Gox reopened, just to see how my big buy order at 35€ was not fulfilled for just a couple of euros (bottom in € was 37€). That really pissed me off, I think I should trade in USD, as it's much easier to spot support and resistance points.



25. Post 1940853 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: RationalSpeculator on April 25, 2013, 01:57:27 PM

Of course there is a verifiable fact. Just check the "trade history" on bitcoincharts or similar, or follow the "time & sales" on http://bitcoin.clarkmoody.com/.

I'm sorry but I can't find this on bitcoincharts or clarkmoody. Could you give me more details how to find this transaction? A link would be greatly appreciated.

Sorry, I see the trades in real time, I don't know where to find an historic that goes till April, 10th (but I'm sure it exists - somebody knows where to find it?)

I can guarantee you that I was actively trading and watching the trades at that moment, and the first of the many dumps we had during the crash was a very big 69KBTC sale (I'm sure other fellow readers will confirm this point)



26. Post 1940935 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

As a funny note, there was a few users who spread the rumor that the one dumping the 69K that triggered the crash was Silk Road (for example, see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=85687.msg1804571#msg1804571)

The dump was real, the one who did it's unknown (at least I have seen no proof other than rumors and different posts).

And of course a dump triggered the crash - it always start like that. The BTC is so ridiculously illiquid that a tiny dump of +10.000BTC would trigger a panic selling and a huge crash. Heck, a 200KBTC dump would take us to low single digits! That gives you the idea of how easy would be for a BTC enemy with not-so-deep pockets to destabilize BTC.

And now imagine that an old miner decides to dump +500KBTC coins because it's time to be rich, and he doesn't give a fuck Cheesy



27. Post 1940946 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: NamelessOne on April 25, 2013, 02:10:44 PM
The crash/correction was trigger by some gradual downward selling that caused severe lag that in turn caused panic/lag selling. By the time we'd fallen from 266 to 220, there was like 40 minutes of lag and two or so hours had passed since the downward pressure began. While watching live I saw thousands upon thousands of sell orders go through. It wasn't a single 69k order from above 200 that sent us down, it would have taken us down instantly, not gradually over three hours as you can see in the chart below.

There is no 69k single order of coins sold on this chart:
http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg60zczsg2013-04-10zeg2013-04-11ztgSzm1g10zm2g25zv

I saw that dump, and I can guarantee I was not the only one



28. Post 1941749 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Very low volume ATM

It seems all the buyers are on hold - same thing for the sellers.

But the last few days rallies where on small volumes, crash on high volumes. It's usual like that in BTC, but this seems more pronounced. Last day of rally on big volumes was April, 19th.



29. Post 1942886 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Wow, did you see the guy doing a market order buy for almost 3K coins? He move the price almost $10

This market is so illiquid it's like a joke!!



30. Post 1942895 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

It's amazing how can panic sell turn to panic buy in a blink of an eye



31. Post 1942919 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Jaroslaw on April 25, 2013, 06:00:20 PM
This was just GOX trying to rescue price Smiley

Man, Jaroslaw, now tell us how you are a sucker and bought at $60

You should have bought at $0.6, then you would know that going to double digits is not a "crash". Crash is single digits my friend.



32. Post 1943018 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Jaroslaw on April 25, 2013, 06:10:50 PM
This was just GOX trying to rescue price Smiley

Man, Jaroslaw, now tell us how you are a sucker and bought at $60

You should have bought at $0.6, then you would know that going to double digits is not a "crash". Crash is single digits my friend.

It dont matter for me im full of cash right now Smiley Dont care if it will be single or double digits. It will fall Smiley

Of course it will fall, and it will fard much harder than this. And then it will raise again, probably much higher than before... right? That's what happens with a commodity with a very limited supply or a "penny stock market". Great.... and you studied economics for that?



33. Post 1944647 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Bought some more BTC at $121, let's see Wink



34. Post 1944684 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: deepceleron on April 25, 2013, 08:43:30 PM
Well now you know what $2M panicking looks like.

I would love some more $70 coins Cheesy



35. Post 1944837 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: dmiceman on April 25, 2013, 08:45:54 PM
Well now you know what $2M panicking looks like.

I would love some more $70 coins Cheesy

You should love them a lot when a price will be 30.

I have buy orders all the way down from $70 to $30. But I think that anything below $50 is highly unlikely. We already had HUGE selloffs after the crash, there's no so many coins to dump left.



36. Post 1945054 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Bjork on April 25, 2013, 09:00:19 PM
feel sick in stomach really, lol, I knew it won't go below 120, placed orders at 121 and 122 but too late with bloody gox lag. Missed the easiest few hundreds ever.

Should have placed that 125 order before I left...  Cry

I think you will get another chance.  We are still slipping

Definitely, but it was still 20$ per coin in 2 minutes trade and more money to buy when it goes down again.

don't beat yourself up about missed profits.  if we could read the future, we'd all be rich Smiley

Man, you need to place those on beforehand. I had a buy order at $121.5, then I have others at $101.5, $86, $71.5, $66.5, $52.5, $42 and finally $35

If we crash to those support points the order is already there Cheesy

And it's always easier to CANCEL and orther than to place one during the lag.



37. Post 1945102 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 25, 2013, 09:20:43 PM
please dump more coins... i didn't get my fair share...

Yeah, dump 'em hard, if it goes below $50 I promise I'll go all in, and i'll send all the coins to a paper wallet and forget about trading Cheesy



38. Post 1945521 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

And there goes the $140 resistance...



39. Post 1949312 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Fasten your seat belts: ask sum on the rise. If it keeps rising you know what it means, right?




40. Post 1950130 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Real support is at $120, if we break it next real support is $85/90

Hopefully we see sub $50 coins soon  Grin



41. Post 1950552 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

http://thenextweb.com/shareables/2013/04/26/this-new-web-mod-shows-you-bitcoin-prices-for-ebay-auctions/?utm_campaign=social%20media&awesm=tnw.to_f0e8w&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Spreadus&utm_term=10%20Things%20In%20Tech%20You%20Need%20To%20Know

BTC prices displayed on Ebay

despite the bubble burst, news are quite bullish -> this is very different from what we had in 2011.



42. Post 1950919 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: seleme on April 26, 2013, 12:50:26 PM
Price seems to be crashing.... up  Smiley

I might be wrong and been many times but this definitely doesn't look like something that has serious support to go up and stay there. 120-130 (if not lower) looks much, much more realistic than above. You can smell the fear on the market.

then it's time to be greedy  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin



43. Post 1955559 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Nice stability with good volume. BTC is here to stay  Smiley



44. Post 1959503 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 27, 2013, 02:31:49 PM
The price is not considered a bargain as its still remaining in this range..I'm betting for a black monday..

And your definition for "black" goes something like...

...it crashes through rpietila's support line of $115, goes all the way to $95, enabling rpietila to invest the proceeds of last week's OTC trades (about 700 grams of gold, 22 kg of silver, EUR 28k cash, 60k bank money) with 30% better exchange rate that he would otherwise get, and bounces back to barely above $110, closing the month with a +15% green candle.

Black indeed. I'm looking forward to it..  Grin

Me too. But I won't discard the price to go straight up, just barely touching $125... There are bullish signs everywhere, including very positive media attention despite the bubble burst, which every day looks more like a simple correction.



45. Post 1975076 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on April 29, 2013, 12:36:11 PM
Goat is selling, everybody panic! Smiley

I'm still bullish. I also have already covered most of what I sold from a local guy who had been begging me to buy for a week now.

I'm going to lose some money on this deal but I wanted to call his bluff if it is one. If it is not a bluff and he can move 100k USD at the drop of a hat then respect.

Time will tell.

IMO moving 100K is not a big deal, considering that just a few months ago BTC was at $14 and a lot of people here have considerable profits.

If he proved he can move 1M (7,000BTC)... Well, that would be something.




46. Post 1978382 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

If the "kiddie porn" on the blockchain news is true expect a rally.... downwards.

Sources:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=191039.0
http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/2013/04/bitcoin-as-a-publishing-system-from-wikileaks-to-pedophile-links.html?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=t.co



47. Post 1979005 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: lebing on April 29, 2013, 07:58:21 PM

Right, because when kiddie porn was first put onto the internet, everyone freaked out and stopped using the internet.




Please, if you're going to FUD at least have the decency to do it well.

I have no intention to spread FUD

But you won't deny that's the type of headline that would make quite a lot of people to freak out if it arrives to mainstream front pages. Hopefully it won't be given any credit.



48. Post 1979789 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: molecular on April 29, 2013, 09:39:20 PM
Bulls, could you kindly shut up please? Each time you say rally is starting it goes back for dollar or two  Grin

I think we go down to $120 again now.


That would be a nice point to buy some more. Exchanges will improve, news is still positive ATM, everything looks stronger in mid term



49. Post 1985095 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: zebedee on April 30, 2013, 01:10:50 PM
I'm a whale.  What do I do next?   Undecided

Sing!



50. Post 1985179 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 30, 2013, 01:27:18 PM
I'm a whale.  What do I do next?   Undecided

Sing!

My voice instructor actually visited the hotel last weekend, but we did not have opportunity to practice. She bought some bitcoins though Smiley

Well done then!



51. Post 1985347 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 30, 2013, 01:45:32 PM
It seems to be going up or down.

That's a smart remark indeed Cheesy



52. Post 1985650 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on April 30, 2013, 02:22:48 PM
down it goes


1 small dump and it's pure panic...
Unbelievable...

Great, let's buy some more. I have bids from $125 to $30ish, wouldn't mind if they get hit Cheesy



53. Post 1985664 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Well, down we go. I bet $120 will not be broken. If it is, cheap coins for all us Wink



54. Post 1985698 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on April 30, 2013, 02:28:40 PM
down it goes


1 small dump and it's pure panic...
Unbelievable...

Great, let's buy some more. I have bids from $125 to $30ish, wouldn't mind if they get hit Cheesy

Exactly how long do people want this to go on?
Don't you want the coin to grow? You know people will get tired of it sooner or later.
Big sell, drop, buy, big sell, drop, buy...
At what point will people stop saying i wish it would go back to 30?

I think BTC has a long way to go. I strongly believe it is not a quick-rich scheme. That said, I have in my mind a quantity of BTC I want to own, based on a % of the total amount (it's small, don't think I'm some kind of Winklevoss guy), and each dip is a buying opportunity in my book. I almost never exchange BTC for fiat, but I buy more BTC when I have the occasion (always with money I can afford to loose, obviously).

BTC will always rise and crash, like all commodity-like assets. And now is a newborn: market is a peanut (just barely $20M sitting in the order book ATM, is like a joke), infrastructure is poor (only one exchange controlling 80% of the market? WTF?), real economy activity besides pure speculation is almost non existant. All this points need to be addressed before BTC develops to its full potential.

TBH, crashes excite me more than rallies, because I know I will be able to buy more BTC's, which then I can hold or exchange for goods and services. I may be a pervert, but that's how I am.



55. Post 1985714 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Man, it looks like we're not even going to test $125, that's disappointing. I don't think we would have broken that level anyway.

Let's see how things develop tomorrow - Wednesday is usually the day in which rallies or crashes are triggered.



56. Post 1985769 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on April 30, 2013, 02:40:11 PM
down it goes


1 small dump and it's pure panic...
Unbelievable...

Great, let's buy some more. I have bids from $125 to $30ish, wouldn't mind if they get hit Cheesy

Exactly how long do people want this to go on?
Don't you want the coin to grow? You know people will get tired of it sooner or later.
Big sell, drop, buy, big sell, drop, buy...
At what point will people stop saying i wish it would go back to 30?

I think BTC has a long way to go. I strongly believe it is not a quick-rich scheme. That said, I have in my mind a quantity of BTC I want to own, based on a % of the total amount (it's small, don't think I'm some kind of Winklevoss guy), and each dip is a buying opportunity in my book. I almost never exchange BTC for fiat, but I buy more BTC when I have the occasion (always with money I can afford to loose, obviously).

BTC will always rise and crash, like all commodity-like assets. And now is a newborn: market is a peanut (just barely $20M sitting in the order book ATM, is like a joke), infrastructure is poor (only one exchange controlling 80% of the market? WTF?), real economy activity besides pure speculation is almost non existant. All this points need to be addressed before BTC develops to its full potential.

TBH, crashes excite me more than rallies, because I know I will be able to buy more BTC's, which then I can hold or exchange for goods and services. I may be a pervert, but that's how I am.

I totally see where you're coming from but imo this is not good for the coin. I think it needs some more growth and not these constant crashes. But that's just my opinion ofcourse.

I think it's also something that has to do with a philosophical point of view.

For me BTC is a way to say f**k off to dirty fiat and financial corporations, it is a way to break the chains of debt money. I think this is one of the main intentions of Satoshi and Co.

But for most of people here BTC means: I have 1,000BTC that costed me 1,000$, and now those BTC are 1,000x$140 = $140K. So their BTC has a value in relation to fiat money, which is something that seems absurd to me.

Personally, I don't want more fiat - I already earn what I need to live working. I want the freedom and the power BTC gives to individuals, thus I want more BTC and I don't really care about it skyrocketing in fiat terms.



57. Post 1985907 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: molecular on April 30, 2013, 02:58:56 PM
I think it's also something that has to do with a philosophical point of view.

For me BTC is a way to say f**k off to dirty fiat and financial corporations, it is a way to break the chains of debt money. I think this is one of the main intentions of Satoshi and Co.

But for most of people here BTC means: I have 1,000BTC that costed me 1,000$, and now those BTC are 1,000x$140 = $140K. So their BTC has a value in relation to fiat money, which is something that seems absurd to me.

Personally, I don't want more fiat - I already earn what I need to live working. I want the freedom and the power BTC gives to individuals, thus I want more BTC and I don't really care about it skyrocketing in fiat terms.

I hear you and agree. Totally. (only trade to try to get more BTC).

However a high valuation in terms of fiat is a sign that the world is starting to take bitcoin seriously as money.

I believe the part in bold is true - but anyhow I also believe that the infrastructure is too fragile and the real economy too tiny for BTC to be ready for prime time.

Come on, a decentralized currency with an exchange that controls 80% of the market? They could be making up all the trades, creating an epic pump-and-dump scheme, and nobody could do nothing - all other exchanges just follow Gox's price. Or Gox could be shut down, and that would be a huge and dangerous (although not lethal) hit for BTC.

Making a long story short: we really need to work on BTC to improve it's infrastructure, it's real economy. There's still a long way to go before being ready for prime time.



58. Post 1986042 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

It seems DDoS is not so profitable anymore. All weak hands seem to have panicked in the last few weeks. In fact we had huge daily volumes after the correction of April, 10th.



59. Post 1986135 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on April 30, 2013, 03:22:34 PM
I don't think it's a DDOS...

You really see so many trades to lag the engine? I see a ridiculous amount of trades. If that lags their engine... Wow.



60. Post 1986627 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: rpietila on April 30, 2013, 01:45:32 PM
It seems to be going up or down.

I pay 2:1 that it is up.

I say 3:1 that is down.

Coins on the order book are peaking, money is going away. Yeah, those are just weak indicators, but it seems obvious to me that all the influx of new money just stopped with the correction. We're in the real price discovery phase here, and we may go lower... Anyhow this price level (or even $50ish BTW) is very good after the severe correction we had on April, 10th. Anything above $100 is very bullish mid-term IMO - and BTC is looking more bullish than ever in the long term.





61. Post 1986850 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: tHash on April 30, 2013, 04:52:07 PM

LOL keep telling yourself that when we are at $150+ by week's end.

Oh and by the way...you should sell now and buy back in higher. Thanks  Tongue

 Roll Eyes

I might not be very useful for price prediction but, reading Smoothie signature, I think I've spotted a strong pattern.

The set of those who ordered BFL ASIC miner is remarkably congruent with the set of those who endlessly et brainlessly claim that "BTC price will be 500$ next week".

I wonder if this compliance for scam is just a coincidence or the sign of a deeper psychological deficiency...



I bought BFL ASICs when BTC was $6, figuring that it may double through the halving, and then with great luck be maybe $20 or $25 by now.   I may be slightly upset if I had paid BTC, but at the time there was less risk in mining then holding, IMO.   For me, above $100 is pure heaven, if I in fact ever receive my miners . . .

Deficiency exists only in those who ridicule others.

I bought BFL with BTC, so imagine my feeling. Anyway, is a bet I lost - it's only my fault. Who cares, I only gambled money I could afford to loose, now it's fiat value is x10, but still... It was just a quantity of BTC I was ok with gambling, and as I explained earlier I'm not concerned with the fiat exchange rate - that will crash and raise many times in the long run, and the long run is the only thing important for me.



62. Post 1987976 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Quote from: cedivad on April 30, 2013, 06:58:22 PM

I needed to investigate the gif, the guy is still alive - he will never walk again, but he is alive.

he walked: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2168722/Base-jumpers-120-metre-death-plunge-parachute-fails-open--SURVIVES-snow-cushions-fall.html



63. Post 1988650 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.54h):

Let's be serious, only real support is at $120. Breaking or not that point is a real mid term indicator.



64. Post 1989131 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: cedivad on April 30, 2013, 09:25:35 PM
Place your bids 120 will soon be close!
I read this as a "please, don't let 120 fall"
Not as in "easy money if you buy at 120"

The truth is that the media mania period expired and we are going down for some time. I personally don't think that 120 will hold. Long term bullish, medium term bear.

I agree with that. Don't know what will be the bottom, but if we break $120, a decline to $70 wouldn't surprise me. Anyhow, long term Bitcoin looks stronger than ever.



65. Post 1989584 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: DougTanner on April 30, 2013, 10:35:46 PM

i know it's against  todays experience.. but .. ..     to me looks like bullish. 

I honestly don't understand why the price is falling today. Nothing but great news coming out for the past week. There are a lot of very rich folks with lots invested in Bitcoin and Bitcoin-companies that are going to be building out the infrastructure something fierce over the next year.

Because most of the people pour their fiat in just because the price raises, and a bubble just bursted?

This is what you get when speculative mania cools down.



66. Post 1989627 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 30, 2013, 10:40:38 PM

i know it's against  todays experience.. but .. ..     to me looks like bullish. 

I honestly don't understand why the price is falling today. Nothing but great news coming out for the past week. There are a lot of very rich folks with lots invested in Bitcoin and Bitcoin-companies that are going to be building out the infrastructure something fierce over the next year.

Because most of the people pour their fiat in just because the price raises, and a bubble just bursted?

This is what you get when speculative mania cools down.

good buying opportunity today, rockets taking off tonight or tomorrow

but watch out for that red hot 120$ end of week sales could drop us down under 100 for a little while

oh boy would that be fun  Grin

that'd be lovely Wink



67. Post 1990248 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: underground_ on May 01, 2013, 12:14:02 AM


gulp

here we go



68. Post 1990281 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

If ask sum keeps growing at that rate you know what that means, smoothie. Down.



69. Post 1990592 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: smoothie on May 01, 2013, 01:00:36 AM
If ask sum keeps growing at that rate you know what that means, smoothie. Down.


LOL uh no. That's like saying if someone with a giant cock pulls it out that the world 100 miles away will start feeling like turning into a vagina.


Sorry WALLS MEAN NOTHING.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

most hands are weaker than yours, smooth.



70. Post 1993039 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Arepo is stating facts. Don't really know why some of you are so shure on the sort term bull, when everything logically leads to the opposite.



71. Post 1993354 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 01, 2013, 10:41:00 AM
- I could not care less if it crashed to $10;
I do. Because if it ever got to that price again then it would be due to a major disaster with the Bitcoin protocol.

If the Bitcoin protocol goes beyond repair, we will develop a new coin, and the party will continue. I go to have a bath in the spa and then some dinner, see you in 2 hours! Wink

Whatever man, maybe at that spa you will develop a new coin that will fullfil your delusion of grandeur  Cool



72. Post 1995175 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: mp420 on May 01, 2013, 01:12:02 PM
I'm not taking rpietila's offer because I think I'm comfortable as is, without needing to leverage. I have about 80 dollars on MtGox per every BTC I have (including everything I have in cold storage). If the price goes up, my Bitcoins rise in value. If the price goes down, I have an opportunity to purchase more bitcoins at a reduced price.

That's more or less my situation.



73. Post 1995189 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 01, 2013, 01:42:43 PM
Isn't this the place to use all of your verbal wit to talk the price up?

You are talking it down, man

And nobody will send you 100BTC without a trusted escrow



74. Post 1995222 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Ask sum skyrocketing




75. Post 1995306 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 01, 2013, 03:48:25 PM
Ask sum skyrocketing

Dont worry ...

It is good to remember that there are no fake bid walls, but fake ask walls abound... Roll Eyes

lol

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

We're approaching the battlefield at $120, Bears has more bullets than we thought Cheesy



76. Post 2009195 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Here comes the cheap coins party, 180K in the order book



But yeah, "we are not going to see $115 ever again, and thus I offer a put and blah blah blah"

Cheesy



77. Post 2010863 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

here we go



78. Post 2019461 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Come on, Arepo's not been so bullish as you say - in fact he predicted "next stop, 90s" just a few days ago

I'm quite bearish, I think more than arepo - but short term he's been pretty accurate and all his analysis are very well reasoned, not like our lizar man friend.

BTW: I was too bearish today - bought in at $86 with bids placed days ago, and as I wrongly predicted on the fly a steeper dip to $70ish I sold at a loss at $80.5 with the hope to buy back at $72

Obviously I was too bearish and I sold at the very bottom burning some precious BTC (I always tell to myself: don't exchange BTC for fiat, but as I want more BTC greeds takes over Cheesy) - if I sticked to Arepo's prediction I would be good now Wink

I'm not saying we will not go down in the next days - I feel we will. But short term, selling hard earned BTCs at $80.5 without having the chance to buy back lower feels like shit




79. Post 2019488 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Wall at $90 seems pretty solid, when it was chewed 2 hours and half ago it just resisted - resistance at $80 earlier today was pretty hard too

We may test again $80 soon, but if it's not broken by Wednesday I would take it as a bullish sign



80. Post 2019509 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 03, 2013, 10:14:04 PM
Well to be honest, arepo couldn't have predicted the events that unfolded after he made his prediction. BitcoinATM, Silk Road, Mt.Gox lawsuit, all those things had a pretty negative impact on the price I believe.

Let's stop talking about Monday though. What about the weekend? Will the price stay stable in the 90s? Do you guys think I can savely go to bed now and still sell my Bitcoins I acquired @$83 tommorow? I'm feeling very tingly...

Keep them man, I sold mine bought at $86 and short term it was a mistake. In my book it's always better to keep the BTC, I trade only to get more BTCs... And when it doesn't works feels very bad Wink



81. Post 2019524 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

The ask/sum started going down




82. Post 2019672 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: seleme on May 03, 2013, 10:31:48 PM
Come on, Arepo's not been so bullish as you say - in fact he predicted "next stop, 90s" just a few days ago



I don't mind arepo, he looks like a nice guy so it's absolutely nothing personal (like I have with rpietila), I just think he is overvaluing himself and his chart reading. And posts with some authority tune that I don't find deserved. Anyone who made moves based on his chart reading in last 10 days got burned heavily if didn't react on events.

Frankly, I don't agree. As I said earlier, he said the "next stop, 90s" quite clearly when we where well above $100 (I don't remember if we where already at $115 or still above $120).



83. Post 2019815 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on May 03, 2013, 10:49:58 PM
I wish we could go back to discussing charts and stuff.


Go ahead, where's the chart?



84. Post 2019911 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: arepo on May 03, 2013, 10:53:42 PM
Come on, Arepo's not been so bullish as you say - in fact he predicted "next stop, 90s" just a few days ago



I don't mind arepo, he looks like a nice guy so it's absolutely nothing personal (like I have with rpietila), I just think he is overvaluing himself and his chart reading. And posts with some authority tune that I don't find deserved. Anyone who made moves based on his chart reading in last 10 days got burned heavily if didn't react on events.

Frankly, I don't agree. As I said earlier, he said the "next stop, 90s" quite clearly when we where well above $100 (I don't remember if we where already at $115 or still above $120).

proof

thanks, i wasn't gonna feed the troll.


You said $90 was the bottom - we went down to $80, but still we stabilized at the price you predicted - I call that a pretty accurate prediction.

Of course I acknowledge that ATM you seem bullier than me, and because of that I'm not surprised of reaching $80 (I thought we were going further down, BTW). Nevertheless, I think your work is great because you give us all a well reasoned analysis + your opinion, so of all us con take into account all the circumstances + our feelings and then take our own decision.



85. Post 2019989 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

My gut feelings (no technical analysis here):


Personally I wouldn't mind going way below $80 (no fear till $25), I still wish to increase my BTC position - the cheaper the better Wink



86. Post 2020052 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: seleme on May 03, 2013, 11:11:04 PM
Come on, Arepo's not been so bullish as you say - in fact he predicted "next stop, 90s" just a few days ago



I don't mind arepo, he looks like a nice guy so it's absolutely nothing personal (like I have with rpietila), I just think he is overvaluing himself and his chart reading. And posts with some authority tune that I don't find deserved. Anyone who made moves based on his chart reading in last 10 days got burned heavily if didn't react on events.

Frankly, I don't agree. As I said earlier, he said the "next stop, 90s" quite clearly when we where well above $100 (I don't remember if we where already at $115 or still above $120).

I'm watching his posts a bit longer than that, he said that when it was obvious that fail is imminent after first big sell offs, I don't need charts analysis to figure that out. He was far contrary to that hours before the sell off, then talked about 120-160 range (really?) until he became bearish when anyone with half brain could see bearish time is coming.

He definitely knows more TA phrases than I am, he knows to read them better than I do but TA means crap all in bitcoin short trading (and he is trying exactly that - to predict short term moves) so he fails as miserably as any of us who don't spend hours studying fibonaccis and other ta bull  Tongue

The single guy I take remarks from TA gang is lucif. He is also not accurate in short term stuff but he is usually not trying to do that, he gives more general predictions and is on spot most of time while not trying to please the masses and give them what they want to hear.

Nah, Arepo has his "bullish bias", that of course plays its role when interpreting the charts, but we also have "our bias" that makes us more or less inaccurate depending on the situation. This is no rocket science, you have to think about your strategy combining rational elements with intuition, and from the rational perspective arepo's analysis gives us a lots of tools to work with.



87. Post 2020132 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: SAQ on May 03, 2013, 11:28:11 PM
My gut feelings (no technical analysis here):

  • we may test $80 soon, but if it's not falling we will stabilize around $100 and go up from there
  • if $80 falls we will have a mid term bear market, with bottom further down than mostly expect
  • long term, and unless something disruptive happens (for eg. superior crypto taking over) Bitcoin can only go up

Personally I wouldn't mind going way below $80 (no fear till $25), I still wish to increase my BTC position - the cheaper the better Wink

Who is going to test $80? There are no more sellers left. The price has not stayed still for more than an hour for the past 3 days at least. There had been a constant selling pressure. There has been no selling pressure since 8 hours ago. To me it seems that there are no sellers left.

I think it could happen on Monday. It's true that we had very big volumes, but who knows, we could still have a +500K day to feed a deeper capitulation leg.



88. Post 2020165 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2013, 11:29:27 PM
I bought in at 97 Sad So much for that whole Elliot wave thing... Grrrrr

why you sad

pretty soon people will be all like "damn i KNEW i should've bought under 100"

This is truth.

Could never be sad about BUYING. I'm sad only when I sell, today I made that mistake, that really hurts, loosing your BTCs for good...



89. Post 2020274 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.55h):

Quote from: seleme on May 03, 2013, 11:38:08 PM
My gut feelings (no technical analysis here):

  • we may test $80 soon, but if it's not falling we will stabilize around $100 and go up from there
  • if $80 falls we will have a mid term bear market, with bottom further down than mostly expect
  • long term, and unless something disruptive happens (for eg. superior crypto taking over) Bitcoin can only go up

Personally I wouldn't mind going way below $80 (no fear till $25), I still wish to increase my BTC position - the cheaper the better Wink

Who is going to test $80? There are no more sellers left. The price has not stayed still for more than an hour for the past 3 days at least. There had been a constant selling pressure. There has been no selling pressure since 8 hours ago. To me it seems that there are no sellers left.

The wall did the stuff for now, it's a fair sized one so it's not easy one to break so people are thinking "I'm going to wait to see how will this go". It might even work, who knows but it definitely saved the price to not crash again for now..

And lately we have had huge volume indeed. Biggest sell off after 2011 bubble was in November, with 400K in one day... And in 2013 we had two days with aprox. 500K volume each only after the burst, so it's very possible that $50 is indeed the bottom. Despite of the "this is like 2011" posts, I believe we will have a much faster recovery, and I won't be surprised if we don't break $80 and we go up from now on.



90. Post 2023551 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 04, 2013, 03:41:35 AM
The 10-30% weekly increase in adoption (weekly % growth of the # of bitcoin users), will turn this discussion completely ridiculous before the end of this month:
January: 10, February: 20, March: 40, April: 80, May: 160, ... December 20480.
Even the above contains more valuable advice than most said in this thread, although it is public knowledge that this kind of behaviour cannot just increase exponentially. It will go parabolic, crash, and repeat. Not only I believe it will go to $1M this year, I have not heard very many good arguments from anyone, what can hinder it  Huh

Considering that we by and large visited the 3rd fibonacci of $78 (never judge with more than 1-2% precision, this is not voodoo after all but real world, it is close enough - I should have known from the first visit to 91 that 95 will not hold, it is too far), the upmove will just be commensurately violent.

At $50 we saw 4th order fibonabbi retracement double(intraday:triple/quadruple) bottom megamove finalcapitulation (akin to 100 megaton fusion charge). As a result, we rallied 50->167 (234%) in 8 days. Now that is 0.64% per hour, compared to the 0.08% exponential trendline it is 8 times faster rate of appreciation.

The sorry state of mankind is truly manifest in its lack of understanding the exponential function. You do not even regard 0.30% per hour as fast when measured in hourly scale (on the contrary, 1 dollar per 3 hours is considered "bitcoin is dead" in these forums).

By being dead continuously for 2673 hours, bitcoin will reach $300k USD by...

...Christmas, this year?  Smiley

No. August, 22.  Grin

Granted, the dealer network and some other stuff will have to begin operating, but the good thing is they will, regardless of what you and I do. Even the dealer network fixing excelsheet I already have, and use it for mathematically heavier calculations than "just" stabilizing the price and flows of bitcoin worldwide, which is pretty easy really. The heaviest part is to write enough on this forum, to convince at least 10 other dealers, which I believe are pretty much convinced already, or will be after the I Supernode Summit.

Yesterday alone, I talked to two people more knowledgeable than me. I am just a messenger, like I said when I started posting in a serious way about 30 days ago.

If someone buys bitcoins in May, 2013, he will be rich. In December, he will be poor. The fair value will be crossed somewhere in between.

ADD:
Visual aid: "Bitcoin is dead in between $90 and $100 now." (zoom to 12h).





91. Post 2023699 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

That was a shitty dump indeed - come on bears, that's all the bullets you have left?? We want cheap coins in this thread Wink



92. Post 2023745 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 04, 2013, 09:08:25 AM
we're NOT hitting $1 Million this year.

Holders will be too horny not to Profit take and make a lot of money before the price is anywhere near $1,000,000

Only about 1.5 million bitcoins in speculative (fiat-denominated) hands now. All the rest are owned by the likes of me, I am not selling any bitcoins below the long term realistic value of $300k/BTC (except in anticipation of a correction and purchase of more bitcoins).

When I finish my current spree of public talking and start making money full-time, I think I can generate at least BTC100 every day just as profits. The other supernodes will do the same, and:

- first we will be able to absorb the new supply of BTC3600 per day, and
- then start to eat up the remaining 1.5M coins that is currently in the exchanges.
- Also I will be able to sell a minimum of BTC1000 per day to my strong hand clients every day starting about 2 weeks from now.

The endgame will be rather quick. Everybody who buys even 1,000mBTC now, will be a millionaire before Christmas. I will post more proof in the following weeks. Now I go to plan the conference, that will be the place to decide the practical matters how this will be accomplished.

Do you believe the things you write?

Willing to bet that we won't be nowhere near to 300k/BTC by Christmas 2013?

And all that supernode stuff... Man, what do you have, like 3K coins? And you behave yourself like you controlled 1M coins, that supernode shit went from funny to puzzling

Here you have a supernode:



And I don't see Michael or the others folks with dozens of thousands babbling about their "influence" in the BTC world like you do.



93. Post 2023822 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: TsuyokuNaritai on May 04, 2013, 09:54:13 AM
we're NOT hitting $1 Million this year.

Holders will be too horny not to Profit take and make a lot of money before the price is anywhere near $1,000,000

Only about 1.5 million bitcoins in speculative (fiat-denominated) hands now. All the rest are owned by the likes of me, I am not selling any bitcoins below the long term realistic value of $300k/BTC (except in anticipation of a correction and purchase of more bitcoins).

When I finish my current spree of public talking and start making money full-time, I think I can generate at least BTC100 every day just as profits. The other supernodes will do the same, and:

- first we will be able to absorb the new supply of BTC3600 per day, and
- then start to eat up the remaining 1.5M coins that is currently in the exchanges.
- Also I will be able to sell a minimum of BTC1000 per day to my strong hand clients every day starting about 2 weeks from now.

The endgame will be rather quick. Everybody who buys even 1,000mBTC now, will be a millionaire before Christmas. I will post more proof in the following weeks. Now I go to plan the conference, that will be the place to decide the practical matters how this will be accomplished.

I don't mean to be rude but I can't help getting the impression you're being wildly overconfident in your predictions and seem to me to be just plain dismissing contrary evidence.

Do you try to seek out the best evidence that's contrary to what you already believe? If not, I'm not saying events won't happen similar to how you describe it, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone not quite as good with money and PR but a lot less apparently prone to cognitive biases appears out of nowhere and eats your lunch.

This guy is just delusional, just ask him where he found the numbers that are the basis of his "analysis" (bolded part).



94. Post 2023834 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: DavidBAL on May 04, 2013, 09:55:10 AM
You guys need to keep in mind that rpietila is the same guy who didn't know how to prove he had bitcoins other than sending them to some random noob troll and then asking for it back. LOL

 Roll Eyes


haha seriously? quote?

Seriously. He sent 13BTC to a noob to prove he has lots of them and doesn't care but suddenly he went really mad and asked them back like 10 times before acknowledging the noob just said bye bye - which was obvious.

Human mind is a mystery indeed.



95. Post 2023886 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: HerrDoktor on May 04, 2013, 10:01:52 AM
You guys need to keep in mind that rpietila is the same guy who didn't know how to prove he had bitcoins other than sending them to some random noob troll and then asking for it back. LOL

 Roll Eyes


haha seriously? quote?

Seriously. He sent 13BTC to a noob to prove he has lots of them and doesn't care but suddenly he went really mad and asked them back like 10 times before acknowledging the noob just said bye bye - which was obvious.

Human mind is a mystery indeed.


Sheesh 13 BTC proves nothing, i say if he really has that much money, send me 1000 BTC and i will believe. Since im German, you can trust me and i will send the BTC back for sure. What do you say ?  Grin

I don't think he will fall again in the same trap. Because he wanted to prove he didn't care, but at the end he proved the opposite - so he lost 13BTC while demonstrating his pockets are not so deep as he stated Cheesy



96. Post 2024303 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 04, 2013, 10:16:01 AM
You guys need to keep in mind that rpietila is the same guy who didn't know how to prove he had bitcoins other than sending them to some random noob troll and then asking for it back. LOL

 Roll Eyes


haha seriously? quote?

Seriously. He sent 13BTC to a noob to prove he has lots of them and doesn't care but suddenly he went really mad and asked them back like 10 times before acknowledging the noob just said bye bye - which was obvious.

Human mind is a mystery indeed.


Sheesh 13 BTC proves nothing, i say if he really has that much money, send me 1000 BTC and i will believe. Since im German, you can trust me and i will send the BTC back for sure. What do you say ?  Grin

He did send me 2.65 Million Baht (about 92,000 USD)

He is new here and has some things to learn about our culture but clearly he has powder.

Edit: He is also super bullish on the price, but he is not wrong "yet". Time will tell.


With all due respect Goat, $92K mean shit. I can also buy $92K in BTC from you, or make it $130K if you wish, but that does not mean I'm a "bitcoin supernode", one of the wealthiest traders in the BTC universe, a market player with a deep influence and manipulation power.... This is the discourse of our friend the bald lizard-man, and it's all BS. When he demonstrates that he can move dozens of thousands of BTC and MILLIONS of $... Well, then maybe his "I'm a supernode" discourse may have some sense. Now, it's just delusion of grandeur. Man, you don't need to be a supernode to buy $100K of something.

And, last but not least, the fact that the guy sends money to a noob and then cries to have it back, and that he sends you money without escrow, to then say nervously that if you scam him you won't be "unpunished"... It's like a joke. He could be preparing a big scam, for what I know.




97. Post 2024320 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: fitty on May 04, 2013, 10:42:34 AM


He did send me 2.65 Million Baht (about 92,000 USD)

He is new here and has some things to learn about our culture but clearly he has powder.

Edit: He is also super bullish on the price, but he is not wrong "yet". Time will tell.


Sure?



Btw, this is the last day when we see $95 EVER, you can quote me on that.  Cool

You guys should show him a little more respect, he is a supernode after all.

Yeah, a supernode with a few hundred thousands $ + a few thousands BTC. Man, it's cheap to be a "supernode" in the BTC world! So what's Loaded or KnightMB... Or Gavin BTW?




98. Post 2024958 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Well, from your "category list" it seems we are all supernodes... Cool!

I will pass on commenting on the pic with the limo, it's just to easy Cheesy

Anyhow, as I said earlier everything look very fishy - I see two options: a) you are delusional and not-very-smart folk who made some money in the wild Bitcoin ride we had lately (not so difficult, we went x10 in just a few months) and now you are riding your very own ego trip, or b) you are preparing a big scam flooding the community with your "i am so wealthy" thing

BTW: what about an escrowed bet, so you can put your money where your mouth is? Willing to bet that we will be at $300k/BTC by the end of the year, as you predicted? I'm sure al lot of users in these forums would be willing to join this bet. It's a nice way of hedging - if we win you give us your money, if you win we are all rich anyway, you included, so why not? Cheesy

Wouldn't you mind betting repietila?




99. Post 2024975 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: seleme on May 04, 2013, 12:43:58 PM
Well, you see guys - there are two rpietilas.

One who knew about bitcoin since Satoshi started coding it (he said something not far away from this line though of course I am exaggerating ), one who is ultra mofo supernode and etc. etc..

There is another one who on his own bitcoin selling site claims he opened MtGox account in September 2012, one who joined Bitcointalk (I guess this forum is place you find yourself on 4 minutes after you hear there is some thing called Bitcoin) in December 2012, and who started selling Bitcoins on his site in January 2013. One who advice his clients that they should not invest more than 100k EUR and not invest what they can't lose - quite different from man who is so sure our coins will be worth 300k at least til Christmas. But it doesn't cost him nothing to write that bullshit here, it could cost him a lot of reputation where it's important for him if some idiot would invest all he has after his advice.

It's not an issue how many coins and powder he has nor it is something I remotely care about, the issue is that he is pretty late adopter who had money to invest a lot in bitcoins and it's now doing all he can to present himself as Bitcoin pioneer, ultrasupernode etc etc so he could be accepter in big boys group and profit from it.

Just look what his main ideas are - supernode conference and dealer network. You really think his dealer network plan is to stabilize the price? Lol.. he is just not big fish enough to move the market as he would wanted to as he has nowhwere near enough coins for that, his real aim is to try to infiltrate himself in those circles that have enough power to do that (move markets) so he can protect his investment and profit form market moves (by having a prior knowledge of planned manipulations).

He is acting as no-brain junky rambling all kind of crap here but he is not stupid guy. He would never be noticed without all bullshit he wrote, he is seriously dangerous manipulator and only thing I hope is that those big boys he is targeting won't fail on all his crap though I'm not sure there is much hope for that, there are lot of cocks in bitcoin community and one big dick joining them would be a logic route.

I think you have pretty much nailed it - that's why I tend to think option a) of my previous post is the correct answer, he is just a delusional guy with the hopes to increase the wealth he generated during the latest rally by lobbying with the big guys in here, and he thinks he needs to present himself as a sort of market guru... While the truth is that making money with Bitcoin has not been very difficult lately Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



100. Post 2025036 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: SAQ on May 04, 2013, 12:59:51 PM
Wow 1,500 btc on 103 already. What was resistance has become support.

Have we ever gone up during a weekend? I've only seen downwards for the past month at least.

It could be a nice pump for Monday's dump

We will see Wink



101. Post 2025070 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: samson on May 04, 2013, 01:03:02 PM
hes just a driver of some rich guy or just pay some $ to take this photo. hes a scammer.

This car is owned by this hotel Haikon Kartano and this spot in front of the hotel is not an uncommon place to find this car spend its days parked at.

Ah yes, I see now :




And the question is: why the hell someone could feel the urge to post a picture of himself in front of a kitch limo owned by an hotel to prove... What exactly?

It's funny and pitiful and the same time, and it puzzles me...



102. Post 2025087 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Anyhow the ask walls are pretty big too. 10,000BTC on $110, that's quite something.

Bitcoin is definitely looking stronger than in 2011. Any dip/crash is quite an opportunity to increase our BTC stash (it seems we all agree with lizard-man about that in here Wink).

The only question is how cheap we will be able to get more coins. I guess only good strategy is to place bids all the way down... And to also buy on the way up Wink



103. Post 2025133 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Jaques on May 04, 2013, 01:13:37 PM
3.0th class supernode = BTC100
Woohoo I am a supernode! (means nothing)

Not much, really Smiley When you start to do something productive, then your actual influence will increase. If you don't, then you are a sleeping giant. Your call.

In February, nobody knew me. Now, everybody knows me. When I have finished the developments I am about to achieve, I will move on to other things.

Then the on-topic part: I think the walls permit bitcoin to rise to $119 in a bold move. Afterwards I go to sleep and not post, and the general bullishness erodes, and the bears push the price back to $106. We will not see 100 ever again.

Goat: it's OK, I understand this is crazy and too soon, but it is also crazy that Mark and Peter fight against each other. I don't have as many bitcoins as you, but I do this for my own bitcoins' sake, and I would appreciate a tip if you think my work is useful to Bitcoin as a whole, thank you!


really? begging for money? you? Roll Eyes

I could really use some of the crystal meth rpietila is smoking Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



104. Post 2025224 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: SAQ on May 04, 2013, 01:25:55 PM

Anyhow the ask walls are pretty big too. 10,000BTC on $110, that's quite something.


There's no more than 2k btc to 110 now.

I find it quite interesting that we went up so fast to 107 and the selling pressure seems so lacklustre as it only brought us down to 105.

I think we got a rocket on fire.



Yeah, that's an intrinsic characteristics of walls - both on the bid and the ask size - as soon as the price approaches them, they vanish Cheesy

To be honest we have to say that we had real volume at $80, and the wall at $90 was pretty real too, it didn't move by more than 20% when it was chewed yesterday, in two different moments.



105. Post 2025240 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: cedivad on May 04, 2013, 01:27:01 PM
I think we got a rocket on fire.
Yea but why? I still can't find a reason to buy...
I guess i will wait a few days, whatever happens...

I agree that this could be a mini pump before a dump. Anyhow I think with BTC there is a strategy that cannot be wrong: buy more when its cheaper, less when its more expensive... But always buy some BTC with your spare cash Cheesy



106. Post 2025661 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Man, here we go




107. Post 2025672 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

And I was so dumb to sell at $80.5 my hard earned BTC, luckily enough I bought bought in some of them later at a loss, but how bad it feels to loose BTC in the way... Lesson learned Wink



108. Post 2025719 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 04, 2013, 02:27:54 PM
I really didn't expect this much activity on a weekend...holy damn.

i was looking for low 70s :/

me too, but we may get there luckily enough. As said earlier this news from China are not game-changing, anyhow there's a lot of people and there and if the CCTV news really reached A LOT of people... who knows. Just keep your bids in the low 70s (I will) and buy some now too, who cares, every BTC is worth it Wink



109. Post 2025737 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: HerrDoktor on May 04, 2013, 02:30:05 PM
I really didn't expect this much activity on a weekend...holy damn.

i was looking for low 70s :/

This.

I was even hoping for 60s after yesterday. I really hate to miss the bottom.

Man, I sold quite a lot BTC at $80.5 hoping to buy back at $72... And I had to buy back at a considerable loss (+$90), I sold at the very bottom, what a jerk I am... This happens for not following my own lessons, "don't sell any BTC, just buy more with your spare cash, more when its cheaper and less when its more expensive"....



110. Post 2025757 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Weekend rally? Weekend pump&dump?

This is awkward even by BTC standards  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



111. Post 2025772 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Ultraviolet on May 04, 2013, 02:35:18 PM
That CCTV report is totally someone within the CCP who has a large position in BTC running a pump and dump. Taking anything that comes out of a totalitarian regime's propaganda ministry with anything less than a huge, huge grain of salt is a major mistake.

Yeah, let's be serious: its night in China, and we all know it takes time to move fiat to exchanges. Quite a lot of time. Enough said...



112. Post 2025797 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on May 04, 2013, 02:37:13 PM
"don't sell any BTC, just buy more with your spare cash, more when its cheaper and less when its more expensive"....

This. Do not speculate. No-one can predict short term price fluctuations. Everyone that claims he has that skill is either lying or mentally ill Wink

+1000



113. Post 2026084 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

We will reach $125 before the dump? Speculate



114. Post 2026235 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Ask sum creeping up again




115. Post 2029629 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 04, 2013, 04:02:15 PM
I think the walls permit bitcoin to rise to $119 in a bold move. Afterwards I go to sleep and not post, and the general bullishness erodes, and the bears push the price back to $106. We will not see 100 ever again.

Damn, I was almost there!  Angry If rontus had been working (fortunately he only works about 50 hours of 168 per week, and generally not on Saturdays, and even of his working time, I only give him authority to sell short about 30% of the time, so this is purely of theoretical interest now) he would certainly have smelled the trend change and managed to sell about BTC430 at an average price of $113.2. Then I would have told him to buy back at $103 (he is better in selling but my buyback levels are more spot on).

The 42,500mBTC profit would have enabled our lifestyle for several days...

Well, from your "category list" it seems we are all supernodes... Cool!

Indeed we are. There are only so many bitcoins in the world, and a lowest class supernode is not a U.S. Administration of 100,000 skilled professionals, but an ordinary bloke who bought in any time before March 2013, and has some spare time, and knowledge of English, maths and history. Of course when we go up the ladder, there will be many rpietilas, and in the higher level Goat, MP and Winklewii.

Read the "supernode OP" for more info and comment where appropriate!

Quote
Anyhow, as I said earlier everything look very fishy - I see two options: a) you are delusional and not-very-smart folk who made some money in the wild Bitcoin ride we had lately (not so difficult, we went x10 in just a few months) and now you are riding your very own ego trip, or b) you are preparing a big scam flooding the community with your "i am so wealthy" thing

Why is it so offensive that I live in a classy hotel? The highest burn rate of $200k per month was last week, now I spend at about $50k per month. If I go home and eat noodles, my expenses still run at about $20-30k minimum, since I have staff. Most of the businessmen do, in the real world. Generally their expenses are much higher than mine. I am actually very stingy, compared to most of my friends.

If you think this is excessive for what I manage to accomplish, how about complaining about how your very own tax money is spent in Afghanistan with far less positive effect? I would say the difference is about 4 orders of magnitude, in other words 10,000 times more money totally wasted!

With a rather conservative price prediction for the following 3 months, I estimate a 100% per month increase, which would mean that per every BTC100, you make about $10k first month. A 3rd class supernode can quit eating noodles and start to live. A 2nd class supernode of BTC1,000 can do what I do, and I just await that the real big guys start to benefit the mankind with their stashes.

This is the reason I spend - to show that even a medium BTC-holder can do this! No reason to hate, rather you live up to your own standard, and I live up to mine. If you have at least BTC1,000 as I assume every 2012 or before has (unless he proves otherwise), you can do the same as I do, with ease. Why should I do all the work?? Every city needs at least one supernode, and I am here to help these becoming reality. It is one of the workshops in the summit.

Besides there is no "flooding of community". I post my theoretical observations to my own thread. Then I post my price predictions here, and every time I do, some April 14th troll speaks negatively of me. Then I correct the misunderstanding. In no way I am here to cause disturbance - the instant the OP

Quote
BTW: what about an escrowed bet, so you can put your money where your mouth is? Willing to bet that we will be at $300k/BTC by the end of the year, as you predicted? I'm sure al lot of users in these forums would be willing to join this bet. It's a nice way of hedging - if we win you give us your money, if you win we are all rich anyway, you included, so why not? Cheesy

How about the following:
- You escrow 100 bitcoins for my 1
- You write a 2013 $100,000 call option to your bitcoins, so that I can buy them from you anytime, by just sending you $10 million U.S. Dollars
- If I do not redeem your bitcoins before 31. December 2013, you get my 1 bitcoin as I lose the bet

This way everybody profits. Even if you lose, you get $10 million, and the rest of your bitcoins are worth even more. If I lose, I only lose 1 bitcoin, and I still have a lot (and they were not that valuable anyway..Sad )

Quote
Wouldn't you mind betting repietila?

My middle initial is A.

Risto: man up. You are either spreading BS you don't believe in a ridiculous attempt to talk the price up (you know that's not happening, right?) or you really believe that 1BTC will be above $300k by the end of the year.

If its the latter, I make you an offer you cannot refuse: 2:1 odds at your favor that we won't reach $300k per 1 BTC in this year, and we publish this bet so other members can join up to a maximum total amount you choose. Minimum bet 100BTC



116. Post 2029784 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 04, 2013, 09:34:57 PM
Risto: man up. You are either spreading BS you don't believe in a ridiculous attempt to talk the price up (you know that's not happening, right?) or you really believe that 1BTC will be above $300k by the end of the year.

If its the latter, I make you an offer you cannot refuse: 2:1 odds at your favor that we won't reach $300k per 1 BTC in this year, and we publish this bet so other members can join up to a maximum total amount you choose. Minimum bet 100BTC

I only bet so that I win regardless. If you offer such bad odds, I better just buy bitcoins. Besides betting without actual transfer of bitcoins to me, is pointless hot air, therefore I either buy calls or write puts. I thought you would be happy by either getting 1 bitcoin or 10 million USD... no lose huh Huh

What price range do you believe then??

Man, if we go to $300k per 1 BTC you have won regardless, wouldn't you?

Anyhow, it's clear you don't really believe in the tales you tell. No harsh feelings, just couldn't help myself to point it out.

And I don't pretend to know what it will be price range by the end of the year, but I know that $300k per 1 BTC is delusional, while knowing at the same time that long term BTC will be huge unless something disruptive happens



117. Post 2029999 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 04, 2013, 10:03:56 PM
but I know that $300k per 1 BTC is delusional

How many people you know, who bought a mobile phone, but went back to fixed line?

How many tried Internet but decided it's not for them?

If something happens in the world, would the news not reach the uttermost ends of the earth in latest 48 hours (if not instantly for most places)?

What keeps 1 billion people from adopting bitcoin? (How can you keep them from not adopting it?)

How many bitcoins are for sale?

To not believe in $300k this year is a denial of the facts. Only a technical flaw in the algorithm or a superstealthfast adoption of a superior altcoin currently not existing, or an all-out wiping away of all mankind can keep USD/BTC from exploding this year. Already everyone who has any position in this world knows about Bitcoin. Just post any nugget of actual facts that can contradict my $300k this year or cease replying to me with nothing material, thank you.

Ok man, accept the bet.



118. Post 2030063 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 04, 2013, 10:16:29 PM
I think your problem is that you realize 100 million new facebook users in 3 months is quick adoption, but refuse to do the math concerning what the same number of users of Bitcoin in the same timeframe irrefutably means to USD/BTC rate.
Facebook users found utility, new BTC adopters aren't adopting for practical utility (because they're is essentially none relative to reality), they're adopting for the gamble of making more in a quick flip.

It is marvellous that almost nobody dares to believe simple math, in the context that it would make them insanely wealthy. It is almost as if the becoming rich part is detrimental to bitcoin adoption...Sad Good that the mobile phone did not make early adopters rich, we would still have fixed lines even today... Roll Eyes

1000 -> 1 million users => 2000x price appreciation
1 million -> 1 billion users => 2000x price appreciation

There's a lot of obstacles before Bitcoin is embraced by enough people to reach $300k per 1 BTC. If you are so sure about your prediction, put your BTC where your mouth is



119. Post 2030101 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on May 04, 2013, 10:19:37 PM
I agree that Bitcoin could one day potentially reach $300k per BTC. However why maintain it will be within a year, almost certainly? That is just silly and makes it look like you're trolling.

For some reason you are saying outrageous things to get attention while being smart enough to know that the things you are claiming are silly.

This.  

Rpietila, if you're so sure accept 100 of my BTC against 50 of your BTC. I bet we won't reach $300k per 1 BTC during this year. You bet the opposite.

If you don't accept it's just because you know you are just trolling in a very silly way.



120. Post 2030203 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: michaelGedi on May 04, 2013, 10:30:52 PM
ooooohhhhh god... it's become reptilia observer thread again COME ON

Quote
All this is going to happen in 3 months, I have written it in my diary (link in sig).

It is almost as if nobody actually reads it

it is written



Quote


and this needed a +1

especially because if he is right, and BTC does one day reach $300k... well, this will be up on billboards everywhere

We would be all happy if he is right, but he is not even willing to bet 50BTC of all his supernode fortune of thousands of BTC on his own prediction... So how can't we recognize it as delusional?

this would be posted on billboards to point out how nobody really believed in that, not even the supernode who predicted it  Grin



121. Post 2035094 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Man, what's with that $2M just added to the order book? IMO that's a huge manipulation attempt, next move on this pump and dump that will probably unfold from Monday to Wednesday.

Check it:




122. Post 2035159 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

$2M added on the order book + huge lag on a Sunday, this smells fishy indeed Wink



123. Post 2035249 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Jaques on May 05, 2013, 12:00:09 PM
That's a huge wall at 100. Not sure what impact it can have on the market given we're still $10 away from it. It's not like ask have has been pushing as of lately. I for one can't see how that wall can manipulate anything.

could help one to sell over 100$ when trying to sell a lot ...



It could just be a pump move, so people erroneously believe that the buying pressure is huge. As soon as the same person with the wall at $100 decides to dump his coins once there is enough depth above that point, he can just remove his bid wall and there we go down.

EDIT: that huge wall makes people interested in buying to place their bids above that wall to have a chance to buy something, hence the price goes up



124. Post 2038811 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 05, 2013, 12:42:49 PM
I have a feeling that goat is right. It will visit double digits today after all, one last time. Remember to buy yours then! Smiley

Don't think so. Anyhow, your prediction skills are state of the art, man.



125. Post 2038866 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 05, 2013, 04:34:10 PM

I feel so sorry for those guys that were waiting for 70. I feel even more sorry for those guys that are now waiting for 105.

i waited and am still waiting for 70, if we never get there, oh well.

Why on earth do you think we will go back to 70 any time soon?

I don't need soon.

By soon I mean 2015

Yes I was hinting at the next bubble burst, but you are probably right, I doubt the bottom of the next bubble will be 70.

I guess what I meant really was that we simply are not going to see 70 again in my opinion. I think since 50 we've had an uptrend, higher lows and higher highs.

If in 2015 BTC is worth 70$.. Well, I don't think rpietila 300k are realistic, but, expect a 70$ in two years is pretty bearish. I would say 300$ as normal easily.


Well to be more clear I was looking for low 70's.

And yes, we might not ever get there again. But in 2 or 3 months? Maybe.

I saw the 32$ to 2$ That took months.

True, but this is truly something that cannot be compared to a traditions currency, stock, protocol, technology, etc.
However, I'm not saying you are wrong. Government intervention might take it down. It depends on the government. Imagine the US is against it but the rest of the world is for it...
On the other hand, the China thing has just started. It can shoot to $1000 and then come back down to $70. We shouldn't get attached here. We are really taking part in one of the
worlds biggest experiments. Since BTC is anti-fragile, I'd say the Universe is on our side.

Realistically, BTC is not about getting rich, it is about a new form of money. And, if it is successful, you will only need 1. Think about that...

IAS

I'm in a win win here,

btc goes down, i get more btc

btc goes up, i get Ferrari

man, i'm in that kind of situation too - everything that will happen is good not matter what. But honestly, I'd rather buy more cheap BTC than spend the money in silly things (no offense taken)



126. Post 2038945 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

That wall is so crazy that it has to be part of a pump&dump scheme. Otherwise, it's just too crazy. Who the heck is going to put a $2M bid on a single point, just below the spot price, in such a tiny market as BTC? I bet is someone pushing the price up before a massive dump. Interesting situation nevertheless.

At the same time, ask sum creeping down - let's see how real is that bid wall, it would be nice to test it.





127. Post 2039183 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 05, 2013, 07:23:23 PM
That wall is so crazy that it has to be part of a pump&dump scheme. Otherwise, it's just too crazy. Who the heck is going to put a $2M bid on a single point, just below the spot price, in such a tiny market as BTC? I bet is someone pushing the price up before a massive dump. Interesting situation nevertheless.

At the same time, ask sum creeping down - let's see how real is that bid wall, it would be nice to test it.


We probably can't imagine some of who are involved in BTC. I think that is a fair statement.

For all we know a big buyer (VC) steps up, if that sell is removed first, and just purchases the $2M in bitcoins without making the price move up. Think about that. Great opportunity to buy lots at one time.

If they pull it, we might just run on through it, actually that is my feeling anyway. I really don't think the large sell order will stay, just as the earlier large bid at 100 (?) got pulled.

For some reason, trading today and yesterday is like a movie...

For me it's clear than the large bid at $100 was just moved to $110.

I think nobody would put all his money on one spot unless he has peanuts - and $2M is no peanuts in the Bitcoin market. You would place bids all over a certain price range, otherwise you are just wittingly pushing the price up, destroying in fact the opportunity to buy below the spot price. It's pure logic: all the buyers will place bids above your wall to be able to buy something, all the sellers will slide their asks up... So, it's clear you are just driving the price up, which someone would normally do before a dump.

Just remember that $2M dollars is MORE than 10% of the TOTAL fiat in the Gox order book, that's a HUGE amount to put in a single spot, and its pointless unless you have no intention to buy and in fact your intention is to sell.



128. Post 2040148 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 05, 2013, 08:02:28 PM
I'd prefer it if they nudge the 120 wall first... I need to sell before I can buy.

I think that whoever is putting the wall at $110 is trying to get the price up to $120-$125 so he can get rid of the last dump of coins he bought at a higher price before the value started going down. We should see some movement as soon as we get to a new high point. ($120 or $125 or whatever it might be) - As the price rises to ~$119 he is going to move the wall from $110 to $115 in order to put even more buying pressure on the market, so that he can get the price over his desired value.

It's not going to make it that far, though. People are becoming wise to the plan.

The guy is probably going to get impatient soon if he's been waiting for the price to hit $120 all day long. He might dump his coins at $117 already.

Btw. 2 and a half minutes of Goxic lag right now.

Don't think this is happening. No way he is dumping his coins on a Sunday, I would wait until at least Monday, and I won't be surprised if the dump happens on Wednesday. On a weekday that wall has a real chance to trigger a rally.

BTC market is really a joke, $2M usd and a few thousands coins are really enough to move the market at your will, I guess that's why we have so many traders posting how "fun" is BTC when compared to "real" stock markets and "mainstream" currency trading



129. Post 2040462 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 05, 2013, 09:03:18 PM
Oh right, walls...

So, about the 2 millions wall, when is it going to be lifted?

It would be nice to see someone drunk and playful enough to put a BTC300k wall just $5 above the $2M wall, just to test who's penis is bigger

But it's a pity, because there are many many many many many more guys with $2M than with BTC300K Cheesy



130. Post 2040559 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Odalv on May 05, 2013, 09:36:21 PM

Don't think this is happening. No way he is dumping his coins on a Sunday, I would wait until at least Monday, and I won't be surprised if the dump happens on Wednesday. On a weekday that wall has a real chance to trigger a rally.

BTC market is really a joke, $2M usd and a few thousands coins are really enough to move the market at your will, I guess that's why we have so many traders posting how "fun" is BTC when compared to "real" stock markets and "mainstream" currency trading

If you know simply math then
1. 11M btc exists
2. if somebody can buy 15k btc then there is NOT more than 11M/15k = 734 traders trading this amount (700 traders are not mainstream)
.
.
.
3.  80% bitcoiners hold bitcoin for long ->  there are maximum 74 traders what can afford sell 15k btc


Yet 15K coins are less than $2M, thus BTC is so tiny it's still a peanut... It's very easy and cheap to become a fundamental force of the market, look at the Winklevoss, two guys just bought 1% of the actual BTC supply for an amount of fiat that for them means nothing. Extrapolate that to the total amount of USD circulating. Crazy shit. BTC it's still in a very early stage,.



131. Post 2040833 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: arepo on May 05, 2013, 09:51:52 PM
All this manipulation talk is getting boring/old.

Have you guys consider for a split second that somebody might really want to sell those coins?

I'm confused, if this is a manipulation attempt, then, when the manipulator places his selling order, will you guys also say it's a manipulation move? Or is it a legitimate sell?
Also, all this work pushing the price up, then he, according you guys' manipulation theories, is able to sell at higher price. I hate to burst your bubbles, but if removes the wall there is no market depth to execute his selling orders at whatever prices he has been trying to push to.

Also, if you have more money than what is necessary to manipulate a market, then  you can only go for peanuts anyway. Market manipulations usually have strategic/political goals behind. Sinking a small player, build or destroy confidence on an niche, media access, etc.   Manipulating to capitalize doesn't really work, if you are the biggest player then you are the most affected by your manipulation.

Just my 2 cents.

That wall will either be consumed (even after a couple of moves) or the money will be thrown directly at executable prices driving the market up. I think the chances of it being just removed followed by a price drop, are low.

Can someone who knows more than me please answer this? Zenmario provides the most logical argument for this wall I have read today.

i agree with zenmario. 'market manipulation' is usually just large players performing their best action given market conditions. it's just as 'fair' as smaller sums attempting similar tricks on smaller scales.

You just don't put a $2M wall on a market so tiny as BTC. If you are really interested in buying $2M of BTC, you buy OTC to secure an exchange rate in order to avoid huge fluctuation, or you simply trade smaller amounts at different price points. Otherwise you are a crazy fool who burns his money. You are really implying there is a guy that was hoping to buy $2M in BTC at $100, then he saw price go up and he placed his $2M a 10% higher, then tomorrow he will probably place it a 20% higher... No way. And these are no smaller guys acting, there is a $2M wall that appeared suddenly on the order book (blockchained) and that moved from $100 to $110 pushing the price up.

There is really no way that a guy suddenly received his $2M at Gox on a Sunday and decided to place it's hugenbid  $5 below spot to see if it gets filled... And all of this after a major crash.

Zenmario: you are serious about saying that is unlikely that the wall gets removed if the price goes down? Man, huge walls vanish into thin air every day as price approaches them, and this happens both on the bid and the ask side. Just check what happened before the weekend, only wall that resisted was at $80, all the others weren't eaten, 80% of them just vanished



132. Post 2041140 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: zemario on May 05, 2013, 09:33:34 PM
Have you guys consider for a split second that somebody might really want to sell those coins?

Yes, we're considering that somebody is willing to sell coins, and thus placing a fake bid wall to take the price up

Quote from: zemario on May 05, 2013, 09:33:34 PM
Also, all this work pushing the price up, then he, according you guys' manipulation theories, is able to sell at higher price. I hate to burst your bubbles, but if removes the wall there is no market depth to execute his selling orders at whatever prices he has been trying to push to.

There are already $740k in front of his wall (from $110 to $114.6), that's a nice depth, enough to dump +BTC6,000 significantly higher than when the bid wall did not exist.. And there is another $1M sitting between the $110 wall to $105. That depth is built around the wall that creeped up from $100 to $110 after a crash to $80.

Quote from: zemario on May 05, 2013, 09:33:34 PM
Also, if you have more money than what is necessary to manipulate a market, then  you can only go for peanuts anyway. Market manipulations usually have strategic/political goals behind. Sinking a small player, build or destroy confidence on an niche, media access, etc.   Manipulating to capitalize doesn't really work, if you are the biggest player then you are the most affected by your manipulation.

Making a 10% or 20% profit because of your successful manipulation is never peanuts, never. You set the trends and make smaller players to follow them. This happens in all the markets - in the bigger "real world" markets you have JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs and the likes - in BTC an individual can be a "market mover" at this stage.



133. Post 2045077 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

I wake up and wallzilla is MIA. Anybody knows at which point he unloaded his coins? Maybe he was the one who sold 2k coins at $124?



134. Post 2045422 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Volume ridiculously low for a Monday morning.




135. Post 2046074 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: xorglub on May 06, 2013, 10:17:05 AM

I understand most charts, but this one is completely beyond me?

Could anyone kindly explain, would be appreciated! Looks interesting lol

It's the bid and ask walls.

If you go here http://bitcoinity.org/markets you'll see it in 2d.

Notice the wall at 125, you can see the ridge in the 3d graph. Those are snapshots of the wall over the last hour. Very little change at the moment. It's taking the 2d walls, making it 3d, and lining them to give you a differnet view.

So it projects that the price will top out around $125 and start to fall after that?
Not necessarily. It will fall when sentiment turns around and people stop buying / start selling. It will be hard to get past $125 yes but so was $100, $110, $120... so in the end walls mean nothing.

Right now most TA hints at a correction - we just can't keep going up, up, up, we're overbought. But the low volume skews the timeframe as of which it will happen. It may just hold for another few days as new money flows in and latecomers buy on the Chinese news, taking us to $130 or maybe higher. However the longer we stay overbought the harder it will correct.

I would say that a major correction won't happen until Wednesday. Normally that's the day for both the big rallies or crashes. Don't really know what's the logic in it, but that's how it is usually.



136. Post 2046251 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Fresh news about Paypal/Ebay and Bitcoin: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/04/30/could-paypal-be-on-horizon-for-bitcoin/



137. Post 2046291 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Technomage on May 06, 2013, 11:01:33 AM

Fresh? You have to be kidding me. That is week old news that everyone who is aware of anything around here, is already aware of.

Yeah man, sorry about that, I just received the link on a newsletter today and I didn't see the date.



138. Post 2047056 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: SlipperySlope on May 06, 2013, 12:13:38 PM


It appears to me that the capitulation pattern from $145 to $80 has ended. Three days to fall to $80, and three days to recover back to $124.

Question whether the price will surpass $145 or $160 this month - I believe not, based upon the notion that we are in a collapsing bubble.




So, you think the capitulation is over and we are on the way up?

Man, bulls turning bears and bears turning bulls, I'm really puzzled Wink



139. Post 2047238 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: SlipperySlope on May 06, 2013, 01:08:48 PM
Quote
So, you think the capitulation is over and we are on the way up?

Man, bulls turning bears and bears turning bulls, I'm really puzzled

As everyone here probably knows, I am a long term bull attempting to multiply my bitcoins by trading this bubble, which compels me to adopt bearish tactics as the opportunity presents.




Then we have the same strategy. I'm also trying to multiply my BTC trading this bubble, but not selling any BTC, only buying (last time I tried to sell I sold at $80.5 hoping to buy back at $70ish just a few days ago, you know how that worked out Smiley)

I really expect a bigger correction during this week, selling pressure is quite high, and obviously new money stopped pouring in (or it just slowed down when compared to the times we were in parabolic growth).




140. Post 2047344 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: SlipperySlope on May 06, 2013, 01:23:42 PM
Quote
I really expect a bigger correction during this week, selling pressure is quite high, and obviously new money stopped pouring in (or it just slowed down when compared to the times we were in parabolic growth).

When traders say that bitcoin has passed from weak hands to strong ones, they are describing a mechanism that prolongs a bubble collapse.

Certain traders holding losing positions (the weak hands) stop-loss sell to new buyers who can withstand a bit of a drop (the strong hands), until the latter in turn sell as they become the weak hands - right?

I believe that the bubble collapse will take the approximately the same duration as the bubble expansion phase - approximately three months. Plenty of time for more capitulations before the final bottom of this bubble - I think.

I have bids all the way down, from $115 to $32. I really don't think they will be all filled (that would be too good to be true, I would be really surprised and pleased if we go below $50), but during the last crash I learned that I have to follow my own lessons. That means that is important not to let greed to take over - I thought I could sell my hard earned BTC during the crash to buy them later cheaper - and I failed miserably selling them at the very bottom, and had to buy back at a considerable loss. I promise this won't happen again. I will just hold on the mofos, and I will take the chance to buy at every dip.



141. Post 2047350 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Ask sum slowly creeping down




142. Post 2047421 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: SAQ on May 06, 2013, 01:39:02 PM
Bit boring watching the price right now.

There hardly seems to be any selling. The 124 is relentlessly being pursued. Quite a bit of resistance around 122. Little resistance around 124 - 125, just bears sitting there waiting to be eaten.

I think not much is going to change until late afternoon.

I say Wednesday is the day in which we will see where we are heading at.



143. Post 2047611 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: SlipperySlope on May 06, 2013, 01:57:35 PM

BTW, what does everyone think the top will be before we dive downwards again?

I say 180
I would feel even more confident about my bitcoin bubble assumptions if the price did not exceed $145 again before the final bottom.

I pretty much agree with you again. If we go again to $160 I would be puzzled. Heck, I think the normal thing would be not going over $125 before the final bottom.



144. Post 2047923 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):




145. Post 2047989 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

How is it possible to have such a lag with this smallish volume? What a joke.



146. Post 2048069 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

It looks like bears are running out of bullets. These are mini sell offs Cheesy



147. Post 2048103 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

This is a good sell off, now! Wink



148. Post 2048161 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Team red is running low on ammo, folks...



149. Post 2048224 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: NamelessOne on May 06, 2013, 02:58:25 PM
Lol

We gone from 80 to 125 in 2 days and bears can't even take it down to 120.

Can't profit from this war though, so can we have a winner and do these movements within some boundary.

They took it down to 115 in the last couple minutes. What charts are you looking at?  Smiley

Man, they took it down to 115, but it doesn't seem they have enough bullet to even test $100 ATM.



150. Post 2048603 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Man, where are all the bears? This is all the bullets they have? None of my bids got filled, and I had one at $116... How is that possible? I got goxxed?



151. Post 2048665 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: seleme on May 06, 2013, 03:39:30 PM
Hehe, so strange to see rampion bullish at 120  Grin

I'm a bull long term, but short term I expected this bubble to capitulate further down as per Slippery Slope. Anyhow, after the last sell off to $80 (I expected going down to at least $60ish), I'm starting to think that visiting again $80 or below is unlikely, which of course contraddicts the strategy I decided to follow after April, 10th. The fact is that it looks like all the sellers already made their big sell offs. I'm still not going all in, I still keep my bids all the way down, I still think that the $90 to $120 rally we had during the weekend was a joke... But somehow I'm starting to realize that bears are running low of ammo, I kinda feel it.



152. Post 2048796 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: SlipperySlope on May 06, 2013, 03:50:56 PM
Manipulator... Everyone in this thread is a manipulator.
Even in multi-player zero-sum games there may be significant advantages to players, i.e. win-win situations, resulting from the sharing of noisy or misleading information.

I am here because I believe that what I learn helps me to multiply my bitcoins. I do not believe that what I say meaningfully affects the bitcoin exchange market, and the criticism my ideas receive is easier to accept than lessons taught solely by the market.

Believing that what we say in this thread can talk the price up or down is delusional.

We may have a couple of delusional guys in here who think they can manipulate the price with their talk, but we all know that's not happening Wink



153. Post 2048842 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: seleme on May 06, 2013, 03:55:37 PM
Hehe, so strange to see rampion bullish at 120  Grin

I'm a bull long term, but short term I expected this bubble to capitulate further down as per Slippery Slope. Anyhow, after the last sell off to $80 (I expected going down to at least $60ish), I'm starting to think that visiting again $80 or below is unlikely, which of course contraddicts the strategy I decided to follow after April, 10th. The fact is that it looks like all the sellers already made their big sell offs. I'm still not going all in, I still keep my bids all the way down, I still think that the $90 to $120 rally we had during the weekend was a joke... But somehow I'm starting to realize that bears are running low of ammo, I kinda feel it.

Do whatever you think it's best mate but I wouldn't go with the line "seems all sellers have made big sell offs". We never know that. Panic is always one minute of happening.

Yeah, you are right. Something can go really bad with BTC and a panic sell can be triggered. Just remember what happened with the fork, imagine that it took longer to fix...

But the truth is that after the April, 10th crash we had days with HUGE volume. Damn, we had two days where we had ATH volume. I really believe the bigger sell off has already happened - and that was April, 16th, where we had +BTC550k sold. I could bet we won't have a single day with that volume in the next month, unless something really disruptive happens (I mean a really big technical problem, etc.)



154. Post 2049103 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Beware: aprox. BTC15K just appeared on the order book. That could be a nice round of bullets for the bears, prepare your bids and fasten your seat belts.




155. Post 2049393 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 06, 2013, 04:39:03 PM
Beware: aprox. BTC15K just appeared on the order book. That could be a nice round of bullets for the bears, prepare your bids and fasten your seat belts.


Where are you seeing that? I still see the total sales at 172k. The only wall is 2k at $130. (I'm looking at ClarkMoody)

I am really careful of that order book (market depth is the same I think?) as that is where the psychological manipulation occurs.
If someone wants to bring things down, they will just put out a sale at market and then add to it, no? Maybe a bit of both?

I see it in the chart below. Note the sudden vertical spike (which means that belongs to a single entity) that goes from BTC160k to BTC175k in the ask sum graph. We usually see such movements before dumps, but this is not always happening. As always, walls/bids/ask can just vanish as they came.




156. Post 2049622 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

We had a bulls vs bears battle with high volume just a couple hours ago. Now volume is so tiny this looks like a weekend, and the price stays put at $120ish

Like both bears and bulls are kinda scared Cheesy



157. Post 2049709 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Looks like there is quite a lot of selling pressure. I guess we will know where we are standing at on Wednesday night.






158. Post 2049971 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on May 06, 2013, 05:32:19 PM
Beware: aprox. BTC15K just appeared on the order book. That could be a nice round of bullets for the bears, prepare your bids and fasten your seat belts.



Do you see the sudden drop in the Bid Sum from Monday? That was most likely wallzilla taking down his wall to buy coins. You see the sudden spike in the Ask Sum for today? That is likely wallzilla putting his new coins on the order book. He must have spread them out for profit taking instead of a huge sell wall that would likely take time to sell through. It DOES NOT mean he is going to take down all those orders he just placed and market dump. True bears will come out of nowhere and drop 15k coins.

I didn't see the wallzilla buying $2M coins in market orders earlier today, sorry. That would have triggered quite of a rally. In fact, what I saw is a BTC2Kish dump just immediately after wallzilla removed his bids (you can see it on ask sum graph too).

IMO, we should be testing $100 soon.



159. Post 2050352 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: hyphymikey on May 06, 2013, 06:00:41 PM
Beware: aprox. BTC15K just appeared on the order book. That could be a nice round of bullets for the bears, prepare your bids and fasten your seat belts.

http://www.blockchained.com/depth_mtgox_15d.png

Do you see the sudden drop in the Bid Sum from Monday? That was most likely wallzilla taking down his wall to buy coins. You see the sudden spike in the Ask Sum for today? That is likely wallzilla putting his new coins on the order book. He must have spread them out for profit taking instead of a huge sell wall that would likely take time to sell through. It DOES NOT mean he is going to take down all those orders he just placed and market dump. True bears will come out of nowhere and drop 15k coins.

I didn't see the wallzilla buying $2M coins in market orders earlier today, sorry. That would have triggered quite of a rally. In fact, what I saw is a BTC2Kish dump just immediately after wallzilla removed his bids (you can see it on ask sum graph too).

IMO, we should be testing $100 soon.

You actually lose money market buying or market selling, compared to setting up a wall and waiting. Well, wallzilla was waiting on the crazy typical bear to come along over the weekend, and he didn't. So he took down his wall. That we know. What we don't know is what happened next with him. Did he just make small buy orders multiple times and now has all his coins on the sell side? That's what I think, and not some random bear adding 2 mil to the ask side to drive the price down. If he did what you said and just "gave up" and took down his wall, that is even more scary, to know that there is that much cash waiting off the books to ride this thing upwards. And if that is the case, then it's very bullish. Lets just say he sees the price go down to 110, where he had his wall, do you think he will just keep letting it fall? Close to 100 like you say? I doubt it, unless he is stupid, which makes me wonder where he got that cash from if he is that stupid. He would put up his wall again and get the coins he was looking for. But I think he has them already, even if he didn't get them until we got in the 120 range.

Wallzilla, if you are out there, put your wall back up, so we know what is going on. If he does, then it's obvious my opinion was wrong. If we keep moving up, something tells me he who has 2 million is smart enough to already be on the train.

Man, wake up. Wallzilla intention was to SELL, not to BUY. You don't place a $2M bid just $5 below spot in the real world, if your real intention is to buy. And you don't keep pushing it up, because a 10% of $2M is A LOT of money, for you, me and all the rich guys around. With that kind of wall you are only pushing the price up, everybody knows that - and no, the theory of the clueless guy who just received his lottery winnings on Gox (on a Sunday Wink) is just utter BS.

That's how the market works: you want to sell a big chunk and your loaded with fiat, you place a huge wall trying to push the price up and to create depth around your wall. You want to buy low and you have a lot of coins, you put a huge ASK wall to push the price down.

If you really want to buy $2M coins, you just place smaller bids all over a certain price range. Putting 10% of the total amount of fiat sitting on Gox in a single spot means only one thing: your real intention is to sell.



160. Post 2050692 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 06, 2013, 06:33:07 PM
This is the first time I've ever been a real bear before. I just sold all my remaining Bitcoins. Still predicting a drop for tommorow. Sad


Being a bear is actually quite crappy, being bullish is much more fun. Sad

being a bear rocks. You just get cheaper coins on every dip. Just don't sell any coins, buy them.

Errrr... Maybe I got wrong the bear definition and in fact I'm a bull?  Grin



161. Post 2051025 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 06, 2013, 06:40:22 PM
Can I buy sub-100 back or no??  Huh

I believe yes, but unfortunately not much lower. Being short of BTC is quite a bad feeling, isn't it?



162. Post 2052084 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: deathcode on May 06, 2013, 08:25:12 PM
So much for a sell-off... back to 114... that 110 wall will be hard to knock down... Next crash will be $95-100 at the lowest..



If even death code is turning bearish, as he is predicting a lower bottom than we have had today, is really the time to buy, guys.

Remember what Warren Buffet said about being greedy when others are fearful, and fearful when others are greedy... Now it seems time to be greedy!  Grin



163. Post 2052181 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: zemario on May 06, 2013, 07:46:32 PM
So where is all the dumping from yesterdays monumental wall owner?
I guess this is bragging, but turns out I was right, we are 15 usd past it. What happened to all those 'obvious manipulations'?

Two little walls at 124 and 125, the latter have been there all day, I don't think the market will move outside the 110~122 for a while. A climb of a couple of dollar for today. I for one am fine with this progress.

Nice timing with your comment. Just read the charTs, Wallzilla dumped 2.000 coins earlier today, just after removing his huge bid - he got an average price of $117ish. So he successfully got at least a 17% more from his coins than he would before his little pump. If you think that 17% in a day is peanuts and it's not worth it... Well, then you are in denial and i suspect thats because you are long - am I wrong?



164. Post 2052302 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: deathcode on May 06, 2013, 08:39:31 PM
So much for a sell-off... back to 114... that 110 wall will be hard to knock down... Next crash will be $95-100 at the lowest..



If even death code is turning bearish, as he is predicting a lower bottom than we have had today, is really the time to buy, guys.

Remember what Warren Buffet said about being greedy when others are fearful, and fearful when others are greedy... Now it seems time to be greedy!  Grin

I think you misunderstood my comment. I'm predicting higher and higher crashes just by looking at the history of the most notorious crashes.

2011 crash ~$32 to ~$0.02
Fork Crash ~$50 to ~$32
Big High crash $266 to $55
Last Crash ~$140 to $79

My prediction is a crash in the 95-100 range for the next "big" crash and then another crash on the $130-$150
I'm not bearish at all, I'm just stating facts based on the crashes that we've had.
Feel free to correct me if you think I'm wrong.

You are right. I was just stating the fact that now everybody is predicting a crash below where we just corrected (we went to $110 from $124), everybody is expecting cheaper coins than the current price, even if it's for a moment.

Before April 10th, as soon as we moved from a psychological barrier (say $100) the most common post was "wow, we're going to the moon, my investment just went x10, buy buy buy"!

The feeling just changed, i know its obvious, but Is entertaining nevertheless



165. Post 2053313 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

We will visit sub $100 soon enough Wink



166. Post 2053393 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 06, 2013, 09:47:29 PM
Everybody is hoping for cheap coins but this is very bad for Bitcoin with the price moving like this. We'll see if the people in China that downloaded the client are willing to buy in a declining market.

Exactly. I don't get it how keep act like it's a party when the price drops. It's bad.
You can buy a few coins 20 bucks cheaper. Really, that's worth potentially killing the coin?
Don't you think you'll make more if we actually let this coin grow to 300 dollars and then slowly sell them if you're so desperate for money.
There is nothing good about seeing it crash over and over again. Really nothing.


Unfortunately the majority of the people in Bitcoin don't care about Bitcoin. They just want to make quick money. Preferably by sitting on the ass, holding coins and wait for others to make developments so they can become more valuable.

Bitcoin isn't volatile because of speculators, it's volatile because there isn't enough financial instruments built to stabilize it AND because the market cap is still very, very, VERY small.

People buying bitcoins are also giving the capital required to build more infrastructure for it.

And personally, I accept bitcoins in my business since 2012. What are you doing for Bitcoin?

Thanks.

People complaining about the effects of speculation on, wait for it, the speculation forum. Seriously.

Bitcoin is and it will always be volatile.



167. Post 2053950 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: muyuu on May 06, 2013, 10:56:56 PM
Looks weird that people keep buying below 110$ over and over again. I dont think the dump is by all means over, 100$ will be visited and possible breached

These coins are all cheap. Leave the penny fighting for someone else Wink

Well, increasing your stash at $80 or $120 is not exactly "penny fighting"

And we will se cheaper prices than $110 soon enough



168. Post 2057604 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: seleme on May 07, 2013, 05:02:18 AM
So, we're going to see 95 again?

Yes, we are. Very soon. Winter is coming  Grin



169. Post 2057890 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Brushan on May 07, 2013, 07:58:01 AM
It's Tuesday, banks are open and we're still in a slow decline. Very bad sign if you ask me .

Good sign. Cheap coins ahead.

And don't fool yourself with the "new money" thing. That was valid during the bubble, as more and more more people was attracted by the incredible (and unsustainable) growth. Just check Google trends. Just look around. New money stopped pouring in at the speed we had earlier. The new money that pours in, expects cheaper coins. The bubble bursted. For the average Joe, Bitcoin is not any more a train about to leave the station.

No worries. This is good. Real economy and infrastructure needs to improve, is not yet ready for prime time.

Before reaching ATH again we will have cheap coins, and then a relatively long period of consolidation (as per 2012).



170. Post 2057902 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.56h):

Quote from: Brushan on May 07, 2013, 08:09:24 AM
I meant a very bad sign pricewise. So you agree that it seems like we're going down?

of course we are



171. Post 2058401 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 07, 2013, 08:16:56 AM
For the average Joe, Bitcoin is not any more a train about to leave the station.

Make that: "For the average Joe, Bitcoin is not yet a train about to leave the station."

- But it will be. If not this month, then the next. I called a 1-3 month consolidation in 100-120 area before a supermove up. We are right there even now, 4 weeks after the bubble burst. If I panic buy at 144 meanwhile, it is my own problem.

It has plenty of time to go to sub-$100 in May. Even as of this writing, there is $500k bid volume to 102, which is so pathetic that if I show a wall of 1k coins like I did yesterday, it will crash right here and now. It takes about 45 mins to send the coins.

I grant you the bolded part. I think we all agree that long term Bitcoin will be huge - the truth is that we are all bullish about BTC at the end of the day, which is normal because this is bitcointalk.org

We just differ on short-term moves, on which is the top or bottom for the next few days, or weeks… I have to agree with you that it seems that we will not have such a pronounced decline as in 2011, and the recovery will also be faster. Heck, I even think that we won't go below $50 again - that's pretty bullish in my book, considering that in January we were below $20. I don't know if consolidation will be 2-3 months or 6 months, but it definitely doesn't looks like an entire year of decline + another full year for consolidation like we had after the burst of the 2011 bubble.

In 2011 a lot of people screamed "PONZI!!" and turned their backs to BTC. A lot of people thought Bitcoin was gone for good. It seems to me that now the mentality is much different: people knows Bitcoin is here to stay, and it's just a matter of WHEN the next growth cycle will start.



172. Post 2058421 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Both ask sum and bid sum creeping up, the latter faster than the former. Interesting situation. Bulls vs. bears battle ahead.




173. Post 2058531 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Ares on May 07, 2013, 09:48:54 AM
For the average Joe, Bitcoin is not any more a train about to leave the station.

Make that: "For the average Joe, Bitcoin is not yet a train about to leave the station."

- But it will be. If not this month, then the next. I called a 1-3 month consolidation in 100-120 area before a supermove up. We are right there even now, 4 weeks after the bubble burst. If I panic buy at 144 meanwhile, it is my own problem.

It has plenty of time to go to sub-$100 in May. Even as of this writing, there is $500k bid volume to 102, which is so pathetic that if I show a wall of 1k coins like I did yesterday, it will crash right here and now. It takes about 45 mins to send the coins.

I grant you the bolded part. I think we all agree that long term Bitcoin will be huge - the truth is that we are all bullish about BTC at the end of the day, which is normal because this is bitcointalk.org

We just differ on short-term moves, on which is the top or bottom for the next few days, or weeks… I have to agree with you that it seems that we will not have such a pronounced decline as in 2011, and the recovery will also be faster. Heck, I even think that we won't go below $50 again - that's pretty bullish in my book, considering that in January we were below $20. I don't know if consolidation will be 2-3 months or 6 months, but it definitely doesn't looks like an entire year of decline + another full year for consolidation like we had after the burst of the 2011 bubble.

In 2011 a lot of people screamed "PONZI!!" and turned their backs to BTC. A lot of people thought Bitcoin was gone for good. It seems to me that now the mentality is much different: people knows Bitcoin is here to stay, and it's just a matter of WHEN the next growth cycle will start.

The fact that Paypal, moneygram, and western union are all "looking at bitcoin" will put pressure on each of them to be the first to pull the trigger for obvious reasons. Once that happens any consolidation period will end abruptly. With the aforementioned pressure, I don't see it taking more than a month or two for one of them to get in the game in one way or another because the advantage of being the first in will be massive.

Then there's the whole China ordeal which may or may not amount to anything spectacular, but if nothing else, will make Bitcoin even more enticing to entrepreneurs and established large businesses.

my mBTC.02

All those news are not so important IMO. People just give them too much attention, but it's much more important a real growth in the economy surrounding Bitcoin (products and services) and an improvement on the infrastructure (we need professional exchanges, MtGox is a joke… And we really much need EASIER ways to buy your first Bitcoins).

Yes, of course, if Paypal embraces Bitcoin that means a HUGE growth in both the real economy and the infrastructure surrounding Bitcoin. It seems perfect… But is not. IMO that won't happen. Bitcoin can only kill Paypal, and they know it. They may be looking into it to create their own crypto currency, but there's no way they will embrace the Bitcoin.

Then, about China… Yes, that exposure can help bringing more investors in the very short term. But they will be cautious. As you have seen in 2011 and just a few months ago, real news is when Bitcoin its been consolidated for X time (like it was during all 2012), and then starts to grow steadily and in a sustainable way. Then, it breaks ATH, and the madness start: everybody wants to jump the train as they want to see their fiat go x10, or x100…. There you have the parabolic growth, the bubble… And then the crash, but to a much higher bottom than in the previous bubble. Wash, rinse and repeat.

Remember: when we will go past $266 after a consistent and sustainable growth, that's the news that will trigger again the BTC madness.



174. Post 2058696 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: solex on May 07, 2013, 10:17:29 AM
I meant a very bad sign pricewise. So you agree that it seems like we're going down?

No. Check out the hourly chart. The price is coiling for a spike to the upside.

We're going down. Bears are bringing in their weapons:




175. Post 2059064 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on May 07, 2013, 11:25:14 AM
Solex you are Bull? If you could buy $90 BTC right now by playing into an established downward trend would you?
(Hint: your answer is also the Market's answer)

Your question is:what makes you think the downward trend is still in place?
The dip to 102 may be the closest it gets to 95 for a good while. It was not really that far away. The market might be remembering all the times traders were left waiting on the platform for the perfect entry point when the train was whistling away down the track...


It's a good point. If bitcoins were to break $100 downward I would probably sell everything. However at the same time, if bitcoins were to break $100 downward and I didn't catch it in time to sell everything, I would buying everything under $100. Hence I think we will hover around $100 for some time, any normal crash is driven by our greedy desire to outfox the the guy next to us and call the bottom. It's not really driven by any technical issues with bitcoin just as it rises back up one we get paranoid that the music has stopped and we won't get our coins back. Its like musical chairs, but with bitcoin. Every round you can either get more coins or lose coins.

It's VERY likely that bitcoins will break $100 donward. Just check all the indicators. It will happen today, maybe tomorrow. I never sell BTC, even if we are going down (it hurts too much to lose them when you are mistaken), but I can guarantee you that I have a lot of bids from $96 all the way down to $32 (not that I hope that the lower ones will get filled, but a man can dream...)



176. Post 2059746 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Downward pressure still building up after this small dip. We have not seen this week's bottom.



177. Post 2059826 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 07, 2013, 12:49:51 PM
How low are you expecting?

Sub $100 for sure. Support at $90, if broken all the way down to $80. Then, we will see.



178. Post 2060034 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Huge downwards pressure building up. Next stop, $90ish



179. Post 2060043 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):




180. Post 2060052 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):




181. Post 2060504 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Bears loading their weapons...



Still for now they are just baby bears




182. Post 2060578 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Meh... Baby bears.



183. Post 2060603 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

These bears are quite gay




184. Post 2060679 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

So, the wall at $100 is legit. That's some news indeed Cheesy



185. Post 2060706 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 07, 2013, 02:35:36 PM
So, the wall at $100 is legit. That's some news indeed Cheesy
Don't worry ...
Baby bear is calling for daddy bear

Well, the truth is that the wall is getting chewed, but its not moving. Still +BTC1000 in it. Let's see how many bullets has daddy bear.



186. Post 2060725 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: cedivad on May 07, 2013, 02:38:38 PM
I was thinking about the guy that did the market buy from 78 to 91 a few days ago. That was what, 50kBTC? Will he do a market sell today?
:|

That sir, might be read as trying to induce a bit of panic  Shocked
No, that's not my goal. I'm here to buy cheap, like everyone else Smiley
Since that we have 30k btc to breach 90, i think that we will even stay above that.

But someone invested a lot on long during these days... It's a fact. Will he accept the loss or crash the market? Dunnow.




187. Post 2060746 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Man, the fact that everybody here is cheering every crash is such a bullish signal I'm about to go all in NOW (I don't think I will do it but I'm not joking anyhow)



188. Post 2060958 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):




189. Post 2061407 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 07, 2013, 03:47:03 PM

Thank you for all the coins. Rpietila has bought 2,500,000mBTC, left the trading desk, and will join the guests in his conference.

Speaking of oneself in the third person is a bad sign indeed, my friend Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



190. Post 2061412 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):




191. Post 2061530 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Bid wall at $105ish was as fake as the ask wall sitting at $108

LOL



192. Post 2061552 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: bangersdad on May 07, 2013, 03:58:41 PM

Thank you for all the coins. Rpietila has bought 2,500,000mBTC, left the trading desk, and will join the guests in his conference.

Speaking of oneself in the third person is a bad sign indeed, my friend Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Oh, forgot to add:
- I will always quote in minicoins (mBTC) from now on
- I don't think we see $0.1 ever again
- I can still write puts for $0.1, PM me
- If you want to know, how much I made and how, it will be a workshop case study in my conference

I believe rpietila to be genuine. And i think most people on here do not understand the northern european (scandinavian) mentality - very business like - no emotion.....pure and utter efficient.....Finland is pretty much top of the quality of living scale...very very different mentality.

I would appreciate his opinions on where he thinks we go from here,

He clearly said we won't see $100 ever again

He already said that twice at different price spots failing big time, and he justified himself saying that he has to make fake predictions to protect his investments (or something like that)

Let's see how this one plays out.



193. Post 2061652 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fitty on May 07, 2013, 03:50:07 PM

Thank you for all the coins. Rpietila has bought 2,500,000mBTC, left the trading desk, and will join the guests in his conference.

I love it when supernodes go 3rd person.

Back to the wall, that ask wall is pulling back slightly. He really doesn't want anyone eating it up.

Quote
Major Human Flaw: Some people refer to themselves in the third person.


Explanation by Elsa Ronningstam, associate clinical professor of psychology at Harvard Medical School and author of Identifying and Understanding the Narcissistic Personality: Referring to yourself in the third person creates distance between "I" and "he." So if you have an exaggerated view of how great you are, you could be using this distance to make yourself even bigger. Or, if you've achieved major success suddenly, using the third person could be a way to adjust to the bigger role that's been assigned to you. It's a way to enlarge yourself to fit that role.




194. Post 2062068 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

If we don't get through $110, nothing changed fundamentally

If we leave $110 behind... Man... That would mean that bulls have bigger balls than the bears in here Wink



195. Post 2062924 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Yes it is.



196. Post 2063312 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 07, 2013, 07:17:38 PM
Zuckerberg Palihapitiya says people will get bored of Facebook if they don't bring new ideas like bringing Bitcoin to FB

Bitcoin invested Venture Capitalist says ...

Yeah, he may be feeding the hype so he can sell higher Cheesy



197. Post 2063501 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: telemaco on May 07, 2013, 07:29:03 PM
yes corrected it inmediately. it was said by Zuckerberg's confidant not himself.
You know, i was so tired to find a point of entry that i was going all in at that very news Wink
Sorry man I took less than a minute to correct the post.  I guess I was so impressed by an initial article scan that did not pay attention

I think he is joking - irony, sarcasm, etc.

Anyhow, I've been quite bearish like Cedivad lately - but we have to acknowledge that so many bears in these forums is a bullish signal. Everybody is waiting to buy - which usually means they that already sold what they had to sell... Which is obviously uber-bullish.

Next days are very important. If tomorrow we have a rally and we really leave $110 behind with reasonable volume to support the move, I'd say that the capitulation is over and we are at the gates of consolidation phase. Yeah, we may visit again double digits with some big dump/flash crash, but something lower than $70ish would feel unrealistic at this point. I'd therefore take up all my bids - a lot. I'd still not go all in to try to profit from from any crash we may face... I remember with joy the fork, so glad I was ready for it.



198. Post 2064134 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

I know nothing about TA, but it looks like we are reaching some sort of convergence. It's obvious that tops are lower and lower, but bottoms are higher and higher too.

Buyers are still there, and true bears seem to be running quite low on ammo



199. Post 2064421 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 07, 2013, 08:38:30 PM
Buyers are still there, and true bears seem to be running quite low on ammo

Only 170 KBTC on the exchange! My God, they are almost out!

Selling pressure is still there, and that's expected. Ask sum is high, but not near ATH nevertheless. But now take a look at the bid sum in the chart below, and then speak. $18M on Gox is a lot, compared to just a few months ago. That's a lot of bullets for the bulls.

Most people who rode the bubble has their fiat sitting there, waiting to buy back.




200. Post 2064562 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: SAQ on May 07, 2013, 09:16:12 PM
Bid sum keeps rising.

Time for 125

Not so quickly...



201. Post 2065323 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 07, 2013, 10:41:13 PM
It will drop to 90 this time

Smiley)

It may be, but I'm putting my bids a little higher, I even bought a good chunk at 108ish after testing $110 the second time.

Too many fake bears oversold and thriving to buy back at some point. Not very scientific but hey, you have to follow your intuition sometimes



202. Post 2065368 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 07, 2013, 10:47:45 PM
No decisive movement yet, eh? Alright then, summary time. (sorry for the sloppy style, this is more or less stream of consciousness)

Ignoring the possibility of continuation of the horizontal trend (that'd be boring), what are arguments in favor of continuation of the correction, i.e. downwards trend (red line in my previous chart) vs. continuation of upwards trend (green line)

(1) forum sentiment: cautiously bullish ("I'll buy for sure when we get lower") seems to be quite prevalent

(2) post bubble, volume on the way down was significantly higher than on the way up. suggests selling pressure, but could also mean sellers are running out of ammo.

(3) EMAs: D1, H4 undecided (just crossed over from above), H1 still bearish, but tendency towards crossover from below.

(4) total trading volume (in USD) is maybe on the low end for what is necessary to support the long-term upwards trend. (pointed out by WackyWilly)

(5) re: converging trendlines, as pointed out by 100x, me, and others: post-bubble, bit more evidence for the downward trend (3 vs 2 points of contact)

(6) If supporting trend (green line in my chart) = January 9 long-term expon. trend, then we're a bit ahead, should be hitting 100 only mid-May.

(7) order book (yes, I know, fake walls everywhere): total bid/total ask: 105. average of price if all sold at current prices, all bought at current prices: 120.5

pro bull: 1, 7
pro bear: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

Hmmm... I don't like the way my own summary looks. My gut tells me we should be going up, but my little collection of evidence points to continuation of the correction.

/pseudoscience

Nice post bro.



203. Post 2068588 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: oroboras on May 08, 2013, 01:07:10 AM
Well, I aim for 3% increase in BTC volume per day, so since I have just bought the BTC at $112.5, it's not worth cutting my losses at $110, as it will take longer to recover them.
Anyway, the downward trend seems to have lost momentum, and is turning back upwards.

I'm trying to make my initial buy-in of 6.2 bitcoins* into enough to quit work - I'm at 16.7 now, after 2.5 weeks, so eventually I will manage it - if only I can purchase and sell at the right time for once.

I'd rather take my time, and tread carefully. I have slipped back too many times this week (I had 22.5 BTC at one point, then held cash due to a badly timed sell, as it shot up on the 3rd while I was asleep. I tried to recover by buying in late, just as it peaked again - I lost about $500 that day) Sad

The thing is, I have very limited resources, and I really don't think it will drop much below $110 again any time soon, so I'd rather not risk it.


* I bought those (literally) 15 minutes before it plunged from $250....

You are really saying you want to quit your job and live on trading 16.7BTC? I don't understand. How much money do you need to live per month? $300?



204. Post 2068661 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Ares on May 08, 2013, 05:33:25 AM
Anyone willing to pay that loser 10BTC/hour will end up broke.

LOL

Based on the guy's track record you can be sure to get bad advice lol.

From what I understand, he's pretty loaded and had some great foresight to get into bitcoin early. You don't get to that point without being a winner imo.


As for the 10BTC/hr, it's subjective and probably worth it to some people because this is a very specialized field so you can't just call up any old financial advisor, and if nothing else, rpietila has the reputation to be trusted not to run off with your money.


This forum needs more love

Man, this is all relative - most of people in here got his money in BTC before the bubble, when price was sub $15 - and we went up to $266, and now we are still at $110... Losing money is impossible, there's a lot of people who is VERY loaded and is not pretending they are some gurus.

Remember that buying the BTC2,5k rpietila says he has, was just a $25k investment a few months ago (he bought at the end of 2012 I think - not so early BTW). Not a very big deal.

And BTW, people like Smoothie or Goat (just to say two members that write in this thread) have a bigger stash and they dont brag about it.




205. Post 2068863 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: smoothie on May 08, 2013, 06:20:22 AM


10btc per hour....what a bargain.

The funny thing is that this actually kind of looks like him.

It's him, I think I saw that pic on his website for the first time. It looks like when he was a silver trader used the same strategy to get attention (= showing off).

Anyhow, I have to say I have contrary feelings about Risto Pietila - when he is not on an ego trip, his analysis and replies entertain me, I like to read them even when I do not agree. But when he starts with the supernode attitude, I'm really tempted to hit the ignore button.

I think all his showing off is just a strategy to get a position in this community - and profit from it. No more, no less. But I also think that his way of describing his super lavish lifestyle living in an hotel, his super trades of just a few hundred coins, will not impress any big timer, and on the contrary will attract only newbs and small timers, and I think he knows it because is intelligent - thus, everything seems a little fake and pompous IMO.

Now, let's go back to the walls: it seems that bears are reloading weapons, but bulls are reaching the higher point in firepower in the last week:





206. Post 2068887 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

BTW: who uses bots to trade? Smoothie? Rpietila? Anybody?



207. Post 2068967 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: notme on May 08, 2013, 06:59:34 AM
BTW: who uses bots to trade? Smoothie? Rpietila? Anybody?

I do.

Also,

Head and shoulders?

I think we are quite much arriving to a tipping point. Being above $110 is bullish signal IMO, but I think we may retest $100 soon. Don't think it will be broken, I start to think we're arriving at the gates of consolidation at $100 to $130.

Yesterday I increased my position consistently at $108ish, after we tested $110 the second time. It just felt we were going to break it upwards - and if we keep staying above that level at take it as very bullish.

Wouldn't mind a visit to sub $90 for some cheap coins, but that does not feel very realistic ATM. I will just maintain the hope high, you never know in BTC Cheesy



208. Post 2070250 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Bears seem to be chickening out

Come on guys, let's test $110 again Cheesy



209. Post 2070542 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Holding their breaths. Super low volume, and $109.51 bid wall just removed.

It looks like $110 will fall. Get ready for the cheap coins.



210. Post 2070784 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Nice moment we're about to live. Charts looks bearish, fundamentals bullish - but media hype is fading out, and so does general interest (at least in western world - just check google trends)

Of course these forums look bullish (everybody cheering the crashes, waiting to buy more), but it's bitcointalk.org nevertheless, so let's take that with a grain of salt.

If $100 falls we will have plenty of cheap coins Cheesy



211. Post 2070956 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Hourly volume is so incredibly low - I think we never had an hour with such low volume at least in the last 7 days.

Everybody holding their breaths. Tipping point ahead. It looks like bears have strategic advantage, but bulls have way more bullets.

Nice Wink



212. Post 2071132 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

I bet that the +BTC1,5K at 109.99 will vanish as soon as bears start shooting.

If bears really want out, next REAL support is at $90.



Here the $90ish support:




213. Post 2071246 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: lebing on May 08, 2013, 11:34:15 AM
I bet that the +BTC1,5K at 109.99 will vanish as soon as bears start shooting.

If bears really want out, next REAL support is at $90.



Here the $90ish support:



Not happening. That 1.5 is now about 7.5k+BTC

True. No volume, but fighters taking their positions. There are some big balls bulls in the front lines. I will myself be a little bit more cautious and cover some positions in the rearguard at $104ish, and then I will put huge fire power from $90ish to $70ish.

What I can guarantee is I won't chicken out, my man will stand still where they are Cheesy

Let's the battle begin...



214. Post 2071247 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: needmorecoins on May 08, 2013, 11:40:14 AM
I bet that the +BTC1,5K at 109.99 will vanish as soon as bears start shooting.

Fake bid walls don't exist.

Not sure if sarcasm or not...

Hope so Cheesy



215. Post 2071602 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: cedivad on May 08, 2013, 12:19:02 PM
Good luck, wish I was in your position!
I don't want to do the demoralizer here, but i think that what you aim for is impossible.
First of all, you should try to maximize your profits. If you don't do so, you will have burnt 10 days of lucky work with a single loss of 30% (that will certanly happen to you, sooner or later).

This.



216. Post 2071981 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: cedivad on May 08, 2013, 01:02:06 PM
$111 seems to be a psychological barrier, it keeps getting close but everytime it looks like it will go through 111 it bounces back up again. 111 is a weird number though, don't know if that has something to do with it. Tongue
We are simply having an uber low volume period, we are at the end of the triangle. When we break it, in a few days, it will be funny and 111 will not matter anyway.

That's it, my friend. Let's take our positions for the battle in the meanwhile Cheesy



217. Post 2072142 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Shorting BTC is starting to be available on different platforms. When that spreads, we will see more downward pressure.



218. Post 2072281 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 08, 2013, 01:25:27 PM
Shorting BTC is starting to be available on different platforms. When that spreads, we will see more downward pressure.

I am shorting it... and I know it will fall. Its just making all of you a fool

Currency value equals to amount of gold it holds.

I beg you pardon? What amount of gold does the USD hold? And the EURO? Could you enlighten us with concrete figures?

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 08, 2013, 01:25:27 PM
Shorting BTC is starting to be available on different platforms. When that spreads, we will see more downward pressure.
When the anonymous japanese runs away with all your money.... people will cry here

Who is the anonymous japanese? As this is a thread about MtGox, which is a Japanese company, maybe you refer to the owner? FYI: he is not anonymous and he is not japanese. He is French and his name is Mark Karpeles.



219. Post 2072379 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 06, 2013, 10:38:39 PM
I just had a source confirm who predicted the 110 price as of now at 6pm and further said, bitcoin will crash to 70-80 in the next few hours/1 day (depending where you are) followed by 50 and then stay there for a week or two and then bounce again after the conference to 120 and go back down.

Sell sell sell now for your profits.... and buy back...

cheers!

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 06, 2013, 10:41:59 PM
Price will drop to 50!!!

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 07, 2013, 02:39:05 AM
I have cashed out 10k ...waiting for $50 Smiley))))

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 07, 2013, 02:54:10 AM
BTC to go down to $50... sell sell sell

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 08, 2013, 12:15:48 AM

It will fall more... go below 90 in the next few hours

let the japanese and indians wakeup!

Quoted for the lulz.

Man, you did not get a single prediction right.



220. Post 2072500 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: el_rlee on May 08, 2013, 01:36:38 PM
Who is the anonymous japanese? As this is a thread about MtGox, which is a Japanese company, maybe you refer to the owner? FYI: he is not anonymous and he is not japanese. He is French and his name is Mark Karpeles.

What is public knowledge about this guy? There is no Wikipedia article or the like...
Is he a weirdo?

Well, there aren't Wikipedia articles of a lot of CEOs. I'd say that 90% of CEOs in the world don't have a Wikipedia entry for them. But there is a Wikipedia entry for MtGox.

MtGox is a fully registered company, scrutinized by law, with a large history of legitimacy. That's why is such a pain to comply with all their documents requirements, because they are ultra legit.

Public knowledge about Karpeles? You have to be new to ask for that. There's a lot of public info about him. Start checking here: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Mark+Karpeles+mtgox



221. Post 2072530 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: thoughtfan on May 08, 2013, 01:46:53 PM
Shorting BTC is starting to be available on different platforms. When that spreads, we will see more downward pressure.

I am shorting it... and I know it will fall. Its just making all of you a fool

There is no BTC reality. Currency value equals to amount of gold it holds. BTC has nothing to back itself. No Equity. Pure liquid capital investement. When the anonymous japanese runs away with all your money.... people will cry here

My guess is this is pure troll (and Rampion, I think he's probably referring to Satoshi not Karpeles) but what's interesting about it is that there are people out there who believe so strongly in the simplistic 'gold-backed-or-valueless' thing that when shorting becomes easily available a significant amount of money will be bet against Bitcoin in this manner.

I can't see enough of the bigger picture to tell what how this would affect the market but my guess is they'll have to be borrowing btc from somewhere to short it so if there's a high demand then maybe there'll be profit to be made in lending at a reasonable interest?

He refers to Satoshi? Man, I'm writing a software so as soon as one of the first generated bitcoins move, I'm automatically dumping everything!

(just joking)



222. Post 2073043 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Didn't check the data, but I'm the only one feeling this is the Wednesday with lowest volume in 2013? We had many weekends with more volume than this.



223. Post 2073274 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: ManBearPig on May 08, 2013, 02:49:39 PM
Didn't check the data, but I'm the only one feeling this is the Wednesday with lowest volume in 2013? We had many weekends with more volume than this.

That would impossible to tell as we're not finished yet!



Wednesday trade for 2013: note that 9th Jan 2013 was VERY quiet, right before launching quietly into the dominant trend of the year so far!

This was @ 10:30 it's now around 37,000.

Thanks for the data, very interesting indeed. So volume is not so low, we had slower Wednesdays not only in January... But also in February!

Memory is a bitch. I guess it's just me, anxiously waiting for the tipping point we should see soon enough.



224. Post 2073474 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

The calm before the storm






225. Post 2074593 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: cedivad on May 08, 2013, 04:31:55 PM
Why everyone now turned bearish?
Just because we are at the end of the triangle and the only heavy movement you expect is down?

Both bulls and bears are crapping their pants ATM.

I personally already took my gamble buying quite a big chunk at $108ish. I felt like it. Nevertheless, up or down is only good. Up, for obvious reasons. Down, because cheap coins are always welcomed. I wouldn't mind to see all my bids filled, thus going all in, to then send all the coins to a paper wallet while I forget about this thread for a couple of years. No joking.



226. Post 2074672 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: bangersdad on May 08, 2013, 04:41:55 PM
Why everyone now turned bearish?
Just because we are at the end of the triangle and the only heavy movement you expect is down?

Both bulls and bears are crapping their pants ATM.

I personally already took my gamble buying quite a big chunk at $108ish. I felt like it. Nevertheless, up or down is only good. Up, for obvious reasons. Down, because cheap coins are always welcomed. I wouldn't mind to see all my bids filled, thus going all in, to then send all the coins to a paper wallet while I forget about this thread for a couple of years. No joking.

Im still waiting to buy in 95ish....ive just got this feeling its gonna go down....the general mood in here has been very bullish the last 24hours..almost like everyone just expects it to keep rallying...and the way this market has been recently the opposite normally happens...the market bites back.

Not true. Almost everybody is out and waiting to buy back. Didn't you see that the crashes get much more cheering than the mini-rallies? That's uber-bullish sign. Everybody is oversold, waiting for cheaper prices.

Anyhow, this is bitcointalk.org. Take the feeling here with a grain of salt.



227. Post 2074862 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Great man, you are the 1,0000th newbie that posts that chart in the last week.

So good to see that anyhow "the real bottom" in your chart is $50. That's still x5 compared to 6 months ago. And I would be so happy to reach $50 because that would mean that 80% of my bids would be filled, so I can forget about this thread and send all the coins to a paper wallet.

And still have some bids in case we go lower Wink



228. Post 2075203 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

That 4K market buy was some bull who decided he was tired to wait Cheesy



229. Post 2075229 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: internationalaw on May 08, 2013, 05:22:56 PM
808 coin purchase just went thru!

808 coins where purchased at $115.54 - the market buy chewed the miniwall on that price.

But the total amount of coins bought was around 4K



230. Post 2075281 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Vanishing walls




231. Post 2075311 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: internationalaw on May 08, 2013, 05:25:18 PM
808 coin purchase just went thru!

808 coins where purchased at $115.54 - the market buy chewed the miniwall on that price.

But the total amount of coins bought was around 4K

Why doesn't it show that? Or I am I looking at the wrong chart (bitcoinity.org)

It shoes that. Just check the volume bars and zoom in.



232. Post 2075359 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: SlipperySlope on May 08, 2013, 05:27:47 PM
The now known to be fake ask wall at $115 vanished just as trades approached it.

Yeah, that was funny.

SlipperySlope, you are a quite bearish lately: fire some bullets, for christ sake! We need to fight back, we need you!! Or.... maybe you are oversold too, and waiting to buy back?

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



233. Post 2075449 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

It looks like bears are not willing to fight back till $120/125... Maybe preparing a nice trap for the bulls?

The truth is that both team green and team red are well armed, good depth on both sides.



234. Post 2075488 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: IVIasterZox on May 08, 2013, 05:38:29 PM
It looks like bears are not willing to fight back till $120/125... Maybe preparing a nice trap for the bulls?

The truth is that both team green and team red are well armed, good depth on both sides.

The selling one is a bit bigger ^^

Well... It depends on how much you zoom out Cheesy




235. Post 2075604 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: BitPirate on May 08, 2013, 05:46:23 PM
wow so i wasn't that badly off buying at 110$ last night.
But i still think we see some massive dumping at 120$ back to around 100 to 110$.

The massive dumps don't work any more -- it's just flushing away cheap coins down the toilet. I think people will wise up.

Well, bulls are still crapping their pants - look how nobody moved their bids up after the spike to $115.5 - plenty of bullchickens on the team green.




236. Post 2075958 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: cedivad on May 08, 2013, 06:08:05 PM
Any volunteers? Smiley
20kBTC in 5$... won't happen in this market. A retrace to 105 is far more probable...

True. Let's see if one of those bears with huge ask walls get nervous and makes a market sell.

A good dump of 10K coins would take us to $105ish, and bulls are uber scared, they will pull out their bids as soon as the price approaches, in the blink of an eye



237. Post 2078145 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Bears are loosing momentum. Bid sum creeping up, ask sum is stable ATM.

Kinda like this equilibrium. Delusional greed is coming to terms with reality, and irrational fear is being left behind. In the meantime, news on mainstream media are still positive, and much work is done in projects surrounding Bitcoin.

I'm starting to feel my inner bull tickling my buy button with his horn Cheesy



238. Post 2078467 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: tHash on May 08, 2013, 09:35:00 PM

Push the buying...this will fall like crazy!

113 now... Nothing to push it up. BTC has lost the faith at higher prices.

We want a stable currency not a crazy one.

Let it go down and it will be stable then.

It is stabilizing, right where we are.  

You might say that BTC has gained the faith at any lower prices.   It's called consolidation.   If bid sum was falling during consolidation, then we would see a breakout downwards.   It has however been rising.   More likely to breakout upwards, only there is no way to know.   I am still not all in . . .

There is way too much support growing to ever see the prices you seem to want.   The only reason to want the price down is so that you can buy in, and then what?  Celebrate when it goes up 150%?   It makes more sense that you buy in now, and gain 150% from here, and it would be better for BTC if you buy in now and "only" realize a 50% increase.

If BTC goes down as much as you want, it will do anything but stabilize.

Good points

And yeah, he wants the price to go down so he can buy more, that's what I'm saying: bulls disguised as bears everywhere Smiley



239. Post 2078540 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):




240. Post 2078612 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

BTC14.64k wall at $120 seems quite solid. It doesn't look like it's crumbling easily



241. Post 2078638 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fitty on May 08, 2013, 09:52:12 PM
I can see dry paint.

Does anyone have any theory as to why we've stopped at 112-114?

Look at the ask bids 114-120. Bouncing between 14k-20k. Way too many coins for a $6 span. Unless someone drops 2M we're not going up for the time being.

I guess you're probably right, but 6k isn't that much. The bid sum has just touched the ask sum, might be crossing any time now. We should be at least at 117-118.

The volume is almost half of what it was during the weekend though.

Who is in a rush to drop half a million on bitcoins? Let them coin dump and fill your bids you end up with more coins. A lot of those coins were bought 98-110 and tossed up from 110-120. No one is in a rush to pay them off. No one wants to hold so its slow going up ATM. If I'm looking to buy in right now I'm waiting for a drop. Based on the last few weeks few years those come around a fair bit. Smiley

Let me correct that for you



242. Post 2079295 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: 2017orso on May 08, 2013, 10:48:01 PM
Wondering why so many seem to be expecting a drop in the coming days.

Just because we all want cheap coins. It's greed. So don't worry about it, send your BTC250 to a paper wallet, and forget about the speculation subforum. You will be happier... And wealthier.

Ah. You are supernode by the way Wink



243. Post 2082847 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 09, 2013, 02:18:15 AM
Okay I just dumped 126, looking for someone else to jump on this and drive it to $108

Dumping 50 at 108
120 at 107.80

and 150 at 107.5

to keep the motion down



So you dumped at the very bottom of yesterday. Cool.

Hope that our friend which plan is to quit his job to day trade and accumulate 1000 BTC didn't follow your advice to sell when we were at the bottom



244. Post 2083482 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Almost no bulls in the frontline ($110 to $112.7), most of them are willing to buy from $100 to $110







245. Post 2083500 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 09, 2013, 08:19:15 AM
The similarities really are uncanny.



And the part where it's not the same thing... it's a mirror image!

Times scales are so different... Tweaking the time scales in that way you can find coincidences in every chart in the world.



246. Post 2083649 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 09, 2013, 08:27:17 AM
Times scales are so different... Tweaking the time scales in that way you can find similarities in every chart in the world.

Corrected that for you.  Grin

Thanks Wink



247. Post 2083930 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Kinda love this zen equilibrium

Bid ask at $90 is huge, bears would have to use fast tanks and heavy bombers to make it fall




248. Post 2083971 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: ManBearPig on May 09, 2013, 09:16:30 AM
Didn't check the data, but I'm the only one feeling this is the Wednesday with lowest volume in 2013? We had many weekends with more volume than this.

Update: And the results are in:



6th highest US dollar volume for a Wednesday but only just tops the first couple of Wednesdays in the 5% daily rush we had.

Oh and sorry if I'm getting in the way of the action here zzzz....

Are you joking? This information is golden.

Honestly I prefer to look at the BTC volume - yesterday would be the second day with lowest BTC volume, after March 13th...

Tipping point ahead.

My feeling is that we're heading for consolidation and reasonable and sustainable growth. No bear market at sight IMO, but in any case I'm still keeping enough fiat to take any cheap coins that some crazy bear may dump.



249. Post 2084817 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: molecular on May 09, 2013, 10:47:17 AM
due to low volume I hope you guys don't mind a crosspost from here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=192719.msg2084624#msg2084624



to enter a bear market we need a lower low. Depending on timeframe there are 2 potential lows to break:


if we don't make a new low below $80, it's not a bear market but a correction (by investopedia definitions quoted further above). We could then enter a bull market or at least further consolodation pattern (green). Of course there's different options for "green", I just outlined roughly one of them. A break of the $170 top would clearly mean we're in a bull market again (both higher highs and higher lows would've been reached then)

I don't think we have to wait more than a month to see this resolved.



This is pretty much my analysis too. I think there's some real powerful resistance at $90, and that breaking $80 is very unlikely unless something disruptive happens and panic is triggered (this is always a possibility with a bleeding edge technology like Bitcoin).

I therefore believe that unless something negative happens we're headed towards a consolidation phase and not a bear market. But the truth is that only time will tell.



250. Post 2084857 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: molecular on May 09, 2013, 11:09:57 AM
Interesting, but no scenario has the rate between $80 and $120 during the last week of May, which must have a high probability...

True, and that scenario exists (let's call it the "grey" scenario). That exhibition is not complete.

btw: I think "green" is most likely, followed by "grey", then "red", then "yellow". That might be based on wishful thinking, though.



I believe "grey" is most likely, then "red", then "green", then "yellow". Anyhow impossible to be sure ATM. Buying or selling now is just a gamble.



251. Post 2084918 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Bid sum creeping up, but no greed in the bulls side. No fear in the bears side.

Nice.




252. Post 2084937 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Gox down again? WFT?



253. Post 2085026 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: dexX7 on May 09, 2013, 11:30:27 AM
It's usually drawn as a triangle. But as someone with a physics background, I see it like this:



Wonderful. Here are some numbers and a chart:




1. 2013-04-30, H: 146.93
2. 2013-05-03, L:   79.00

Diff: 67.93, Center: 112.97

3. 2013-05-06, H: 124.90
4. 2013-05-07, L:   97.52

Diff: 27,38, Center: 111.21

Where are we now? ~111-112

Pure harmony.. Cheesy

And now is when a scared bear needs money to pay for new boat and dumps BTC60k coins... And there goes our armony Cheesy



254. Post 2085813 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Bitsinmyhead on May 09, 2013, 12:51:34 PM
I don't think we've ever seen quite this level of entrenchment after January.  This might be the stability we've been waiting for Smiley

Yes if I wasnt't trading with 4:1 leverage through plus500, I might have fallen asleep  Shocked

shorting?




255. Post 2085858 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):




256. Post 2086083 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: el_rlee on May 09, 2013, 01:13:29 PM
I don't think we've ever seen quite this level of entrenchment after January.  This might be the stability we've been waiting for Smiley

Yes if I wasnt't trading with 4:1 leverage through plus500, I might have fallen asleep  Shocked

I am doing plus500 as well.

Shorting and waiting for it to get to 95

Who borrows you the Bitcoin on plus500 when you go short?
What's the interest?

Nobody lends you nothing. They are CFD's (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_for_difference) - one of the many financial scams AKA derivatives that Bitcoin was meant to fight.



257. Post 2086485 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: el_rlee on May 09, 2013, 01:42:58 PM
I don't think we've ever seen quite this level of entrenchment after January.  This might be the stability we've been waiting for Smiley

Yes if I wasnt't trading with 4:1 leverage through plus500, I might have fallen asleep  Shocked

I am doing plus500 as well.

Shorting and waiting for it to get to 95

Who borrows you the Bitcoin on plus500 when you go short?
What's the interest?

Nobody lends you nothing. They are CFD's (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_for_difference) - one of the many financial scams AKA derivatives that Bitcoin was meant to fight.

Shouldn't the issuer (plus500) try to behave risk-neutral? Are they fully gambling against you? Will they only accept as much "short" as somebody else goes "long"?
Besides that I really really like the interface - worlds between that and gox.

Yes, they are just gambling against you. They will accept any amount of "short", regardless of how much anybody else goes "long".

Welcome to the derivatives world. This is how this big blackhole financial crisis started - didn't you know?

They just gamble ad infinitum with funny papers and debt money. And when everything goes south, we bail them out - not directly to plus500 in this case, but to the banks and funds that own them/lend them the money (in this case are UK financial institutions).



258. Post 2087307 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: molecular on May 09, 2013, 02:50:38 PM
Has Gox limited or disabled the bots?  If so, it's a bad omen when that results in almost no volume... Another indication of how much control the bots really have.

Not to my knowledge. I guess there are simply no buy/sell signals for the bots.
What should a bot do if the market is moving sideways?

The error I'm getting with my bot is certificate verification failed. God only knows what they're up to.

Edit: Looks like data.mtgox.com is using the certificate from www.mtgox.com. It's amateur hour (or four), guys.

interesting... I get "http 403: forbidden" on http api calls to data.mtgox.com.

interesting 2.) same client works from another host.


No bots? Interesting. Would it be a good moment to dump a huge amounts of coins? Maybe no stop/loss would be triggered, thus avoiding panic to certain extent... Or what I'm saying is wrong? Honest question, I'm curious.



259. Post 2087591 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: molecular on May 09, 2013, 03:12:46 PM
It's not just bots.

The site has been up and down. So plenty of "real" people were unable to get on. Lots of BTC businesses use the api to make trades, like Bitinstant. I also believe there are trading platforms that use the api to do trades on MtGox. I don't think the drop is just trading bots.


what is remarkable is that there are no accompanying large sells on other markets and no panic. This is not the usual ddos play, is it?


I think traders became resilient to DDoS. Not many newbies coming in (hey, the bubble popped), and usual traders know that if Gox goes down, their funds will be there as soon as it comes up again. No panic.

In fact, the last few days of huge lag where during mini-rallies, not during dumps... Didn't they?



260. Post 2088246 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Yes: we're stable. In the meanwhile bid sum keeps creeping up, we're not very far from all time high (which was aprox. $23M).

IMO Bitcoin is very healthy. Money is not running out. I could use a 2011 bid sum graph, anybody knows where to get it? Blockchained data starts in January 2012.




261. Post 2091430 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 09, 2013, 09:09:40 PM
1000 BTC sold . Price didn't move much.

I think there is plenty more where that came from.

enough to satisfy demand?

That's the point. I say yes, ATM. I'm sure you agree



262. Post 2091633 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: 100x on May 09, 2013, 09:19:27 PM
Respectfully, it is surprising to me that with your attention to semantics you missed the distinguishing point that I made.

Of course I take for granted that doubling of bitcoin price every 30 days is not something that can go on forever,

The market has already demonstrated that the January to March trendline was not sustainable - the crash from $266 fell right through it. One must have numerical blinders on not to recognize bitcoin prices cannot double every thirty days indefinitely.

What I actually said was that the notion is unsustainable. If bitcoin stops going up, then obviously the notion, i.e. belief that it will keep doublling upwards every 30 days,  becomes less prevalent - right?

I agree with oda.krell in principle, however pragmatically speaking you are 100% correct here.

Doubling every 30 days would be a 4000-fold increase each year. I think double every 6 months or so would be much more reasonable/sustainable. If you think that is slow, you should recalculate. Bitcoin would reach trillion dollar market size within 5 years, if we experienced such "moderate" growth starting now  Wink

Both oda.krell and SlipperySlope are correct. Bitcoin huge potential is scary in itself. It's a wild motherfucker, and as soon as it gets so big that the powerful realize that it will truly endanger their position, they will have to make a call.

Freedom, greed and fear - all these elements play a fundamental role in bitcoin.

And its growing.



263. Post 2091744 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 09, 2013, 09:30:35 PM
If the guys making the charts could actually predict the market movements, they'd be rich and they wouldn't be on here making charts trying to convince people.


\troll
Yeah, that's not like any of us bought BTCs years ago because we predicted it would go up.  Grin


Anyhow, a little introduction to TA for the interested:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIdzeC77eOo&list=UUL9No2CVecC_8WazyduwHaw

You buying BTC in 2011 had nothing to do with TA or charts. Give yourself the credit for that, you saw the potential (I've read your posts).

No, I wasn't defending TA with this, simply pointing out that "they'd be rich and they wouldn't be on here making charts" wasn't exactly true.
(With a tongue-in-cheek, I must admit.)

Edit: I saw the potential, but I was also too entrenched to recognize a possibility of a bear market. Now at least I'm sitting on the fence.

For me it's the opposite. I was convinced about a bear market the very first days, and at each crash I thought the bottom would have been lower ($30ish during the crash to $50, $60 when we went to $80).

But I was too pessimistic. I still think we can go quite lower short term, but I'm now pretty much convinced that $50 was the real bottom. In my book, thats quite bullish - heck, we where at $14 at the beginning of this year



264. Post 2091761 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Price discovery phase. End of speculative mania. Sounds good, right?



265. Post 2091835 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: SlipperySlope on May 09, 2013, 09:47:29 PM
I'm really enjoying the price stability the past few days.  If it continues I do think it will be quite good for bitcoin adoption.  As the market is typically extremely volitile it does make me think that there are people who are creating the stability intentionally.  If so, keep up the good work.  Do others think this as well?

To me, the enthusiastic crowds of new bitcoin buyers are missing. Bargain-hunting buyers are more cautious about buying above these levels. Caution facilitates patience.

But should prices slowly slump, or perhaps simply not rise, then I believe there will be another leg down testing $80. In a collapsing bubble, price trend bias is downwards.

Not a bad outcome. Everything above $50 feels bullish to me. IMO there is a lot of real economy to be built around Bitcoin, and it has to be much easier to buy and trade before prime time



266. Post 2092026 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fitty on May 09, 2013, 09:59:34 PM
There's +170k BTC on the selling book. If sellers believed they were worth less than $113, they would be selling.

Agreed. There's 2.7M of fiat between $100-$112. No one wants to cash out 25k coins for 2.7M? So if the buyers think it's worth between $100-$112 and every seller thinks they can get more then $112, that's an awful lot of people who have some measure of confidence in BTC. And now we can get amazon giftcards for BTC again, yaaaayaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

Well, you know how it works. A little dump, bids get suddenly pulled, a slightly bigger dump, panic, lag, spreads get huge, more panic, Gox crashes, market cool down... And when they reopen trades...

Puff, and it's gone

 Grin Cheesy Grin



267. Post 2092473 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

I feel bullish.



268. Post 2092827 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: solex on May 09, 2013, 11:30:22 PM
But I was too pessimistic. I still think we can go quite lower short term, but I'm now pretty much convinced that $50 was the real bottom. In my book, thats quite bullish - heck, we where at $14 at the beginning of this year

People seem to be forgetting that you could buy thousands of Bitcoin for $15 each only four months ago.

Are they really worth $113 or more right now ?

Nobody seems to think so or they would not be sitting on the orderbook remaining unsold for days.


The market is different from 4 months ago.

Consider 11 million bitcoins. 1 million probably lost, and 75% sitting in wallets rarely moving. This leaves 2.5 million active in the market, the "free float"
Winklevii have absorbed 110k for a long-term investment. Many others have done the same. Assume that 1000 people have recently taken 1000 coins each for long-term holdings as the news frenzy went on. That means the 2.5m free float has been halved. Market dynamics are complex and this could easily mean a stable 8x increase in value.

This will constantly change. When BTC passes $1000 many stale coins from the 75% will wake-up and hit the market. Expect price swings like $1,700 to $700 in a few days. All the newspuppies who called Bitcoin a bubble ponzi will also wake-up and claim they were right. It continues...


I give you that the next crash will be brutal. Huge amount of hoarders is waiting for triple digits to dump for good

The slower we climb there, the bigger will be the depth, the better will be the infrastructure, the softer it will be the fall



269. Post 2095812 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 10, 2013, 12:31:53 AM
This is jsut a waste of time - BTC!!

There is no movement. I am selling and moving on to silver or other currency!



Run while you can. Shorting bitcoin will get you ruined.



270. Post 2096299 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

There will be a bloodshed very soon, and I see bears in a world of pain.

Good luck to the ones shorting with 4:1 leverage Cheesy




271. Post 2096357 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Ares on May 10, 2013, 08:26:32 AM
Wow, props to Rampion on that timing

This is only the beginning.



272. Post 2096420 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: fitty on May 10, 2013, 08:37:46 AM
Im going short here fully leveraged. This reminds me of the recent 140 high with no volume. Looking for 105ish to make me a nice 25% gain.

Was just on cam with Bitsinmyhead, was a little awkward.






273. Post 2096442 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):



Hope everybody understood....

That you simply do not short bitcoins

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin



274. Post 2096998 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):




275. Post 2097121 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: muyuu on May 10, 2013, 09:53:57 AM






Best post of the day!!



276. Post 2097186 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Bears are running low on ammo, what's happening bulls? I thought you had bigger balls and a consistent attack was about to happen.

You are just giving time for a big bad US Grizzly bear to wake up and start using heavy armory on those week frontlines. Well, either way we want to see some blood - is about time!





277. Post 2097213 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: Miz4r on May 10, 2013, 10:34:39 AM
Now the important question is whether America will back up this break out with some real volume when they wake up in 1-2hrs from now. Either we rally on, or people start taking their small profits and we go back down to 110-115.

I will say it again: I feel bullish. Too many good things are happening.

And no, I'm not all-in yet, so a bearapocalypse is welcome any time.



278. Post 2097304 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 10, 2013, 10:48:19 AM
The 1 thing that I didn't want to happen actually ended up happening. We broke out upwards. I have been wrong all along with my predictions and I feel like a complete coward. No $60 coins. Sad

Anyways, BULL-mode is ON! Let's get them coins going real good!

I think than in this moment the wisest thing is to have a 50/50 strategy. You all know I'm not eager to sell any coins, I hate when I sell at the bottom and I end up with less - that's unacceptable in my book and I really feel like shit. But I didn't go all in - if it goes up, good enough. If it goes down, even better - more cheap coins for all of us.






279. Post 2097350 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: muyuu on May 10, 2013, 10:55:26 AM
The 1 thing that I didn't want to happen actually ended up happening. We broke out upwards. I have been wrong all along with my predictions and I feel like a complete coward. No $60 coins. Sad

Anyways, BULL-mode is ON! Let's get them coins going real good!

Good thing you capitulate on time to get these sweet sub-$150 coins. Yeeehaa.

Choo choo motherfuckers.

Man, you're killing me today muyuu. I gotta love you Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



280. Post 2097684 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

zzzzz... so sleepy....




281. Post 2097771 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

Quote from: rezurect on May 10, 2013, 11:52:54 AM
US sentiment ? Profit taking or Upwards?

Volumes down.




282. Post 2098052 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.57h):

OMG the $120 ask wall was HIT HARD by team green

BUY BUY BUY Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




283. Post 2098263 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: oroboras on May 10, 2013, 12:49:27 PM
You can all thank me for this new ramp...
I just cashed out to invest in mining equipment.
Of course this was going to happen XD
Still, I'll be adding to the economy from the other side now, and trading my 'free' BTC instead.

I used fiat to fund my mining equipment, saw it as a better way of topping up my investment - bonus of a shiny new PC!

I had no fiat, so it was one or the other, and I have done terribly trading.
So I will have a shiny 3x HD7970 rig, churning out 2GH/s - and my ASIC will eventually arrive, so I'll do ok in the long run.

Let me tell you that your trading plan was too good to be true. Was impossible.

Good luck with the mining.



284. Post 2098544 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: SlipperySlope on May 10, 2013, 01:06:32 PM
Here is the next triangle.



Slippery, go all in man, the train is leaving the station... Choo chooo

Wink



285. Post 2098595 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: fitty on May 10, 2013, 01:19:02 PM
I'm a bear in denial.

There is nothing worse then a bear sitting on the sidelines, pockets full of fiat, feeling lonely because everyone left him behind.

Good news is, there's no shame in buying in, long term looks fantastic, a little bumpy in the short term, but there are enough cool gifs in this thread to keep you happy (and a few charts with lines n shit).

Gosh, this post really made my day Cheesy



286. Post 2099940 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: TiagoTiago on May 10, 2013, 02:03:32 PM
i have started my dump

...
Are you gonna need help wiping afterwards?

the guy us shorting with 4:1 leverage at plus500, you can be bearish, but that's some special Olympics shit, totally beyond foolishness



287. Post 2100996 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: cedivad on May 10, 2013, 04:13:40 PM
Ok, i did market orders only today. I'm tired of trading this thing. (i was waiting for a re-entry point since when i sold everything at 110, i kicked myself not to have bought at 78$).
I bought at 122 and sold at 119. I bought again at 121 (5% of losses only for this move?).

Cashed out to a paper wallet, i don't want to see mtgox again for the next 2 months. I reached the 0.29% trading fees, they want me to get addicted. I have other things to do in the meanwhile, the only choose was between staying all in or all out.

Bitcoin conference, lot of positive media reviews, lot of buzz, 40k btc on buy orders from here to 100$, i don't think that this will be another 2011, but this confidence should tell me that maybe everything is out there to convince me to do the wrong choice.

We will see, bitcoin. 2 months from now, we will see.

Best of luck my friend. I have also made some buys, I have left only 20% of the fiat I devoted to "catch the best entry points" after the burst, the rest is on BTC. My feeling is the same as yours. This is no 2011.



288. Post 2101848 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Miz4r on May 10, 2013, 06:24:20 PM
It's very simple, once everyone is a bull we've reached the top and we're going down hard. When everyone is a bear waiting for cheaper coins the market will go up, hard. When it's a 50/50 mix we're probably going nowhere and there's only consolidation.

You've pretty much nailed it



289. Post 2102009 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: SlipperySlope on May 10, 2013, 07:20:36 PM
Ok, i did market orders only today. I'm tired of trading this thing. (i was waiting for a re-entry point since when i sold everything at 110, i kicked myself not to have bought at 78$).
I bought at 122 and sold at 119. I bought again at 121 (5% of losses only for this move?).

Cashed out to a paper wallet, i don't want to see mtgox again for the next 2 months. I reached the 0.29% trading fees, they want me to get addicted. I have other things to do in the meanwhile, the only choose was between staying all in or all out.

Bitcoin conference, lot of positive media reviews, lot of buzz, 40k btc on buy orders from here to 100$, i don't think that this will be another 2011, but this confidence should tell me that maybe everything is out there to convince me to do the wrong choice.

We will see, bitcoin. 2 months from now, we will see.
This change of sentiment by one trader is entirely consistent with the steady drop in volume after the April 10 peak.

For the record: I've changed my sentiment over the days too, I've had pretty much the same process as cedivad. Yeah, at the beginning I was quite sure of Bearapocalypse 2011 reloaded - but from one side I saw how I predicted lower bottoms than the ones we actually reached - every time. That made me think, there was not so much panic in the air.

Then, I make the same analysis as cedivad: lots of good buzz around Bitcoin. Yes, speculative trading has patterns that repeat themselves over time; but we have to acknowledge that everything around bitcoin (work done in infrastructure, positive news attention, investments done in real economy) is very different from 2011.

I'm a moderate bull ATM. I'm pretty sure that $50 was the bottom for this year - and this would very bullish signal IMO. Yeah, they may be more occasions for much cheaper coins than $120, but no way under $50. And I can tell you something: if we leave behind $125, I'm entering in motherfuckin-berserk-uberbull mode



290. Post 2102319 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: michaelGedi on May 10, 2013, 07:49:02 PM

anyone care to speculate what happens to all the orders from 80-90ish down to $10 if we don't start heading that way in the coming weeks?

My understanding, mostly from reading this thread filled with comments from bitcoiners who've been around longer than myself, is that cheap coins are wanted.


If cheap coins slowly become less of a possiblity, does this make expensive coins more attractive, or the price too high and fiat preferable?

I will just tell you something: we were buying $15 coins in January - and still placing our bids below spot to get "cheap" coins during dips.

Just 5 months later we want "cheap" coins in the $70s... Or.... Well... $90ish is cheap enough.

Take your own conclusions Cheesy

EDIT: if I was not clear enough, bitcoins are always preferable. Fiat's only use is to get cheap coins now that we can. Wink



291. Post 2102419 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: molecular on May 10, 2013, 08:05:45 PM
Using my primitive trend detection skills I drew a picture...



as everyone knows our nice huge beautiful triangle has been breached to the upside. Upper bound (1) needs to be redrawn (line 2 is an example, can also be drawn differently). Not so nice-looking any more.

I tried to draw some possible trends:


we might not enter a clear trend at all and just smurf along in the yellow area.


I say yellow or small green. Don't think we're breaking $80 in the next 7 days, that would be too good to be true Cheesy



292. Post 2102598 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: michaelGedi on May 10, 2013, 08:09:08 PM

anyone care to speculate what happens to all the orders from 80-90ish down to $10 if we don't start heading that way in the coming weeks?

My understanding, mostly from reading this thread filled with comments from bitcoiners who've been around longer than myself, is that cheap coins are wanted.


If cheap coins slowly become less of a possiblity, does this make expensive coins more attractive, or the price too high and fiat preferable?

I will just tell you something: we were buying $15 coins in January - and still placing our bids below spot to get "cheap" coins during dips.

Just 5 months later we want "cheap" coins in the $70s... Or.... Well... $90ish is cheap enough.

Take your own conclusions Cheesy

EDIT: if I was not clear enough, bitcoins are always preferable. Fiat's only use is to get cheap coins now that we can. Wink


ok, that's pretty clear Smiley

I guess there is also a value based on a kind of sentimental attachment as well. Bitcoins exponential growth has no doubt been greatly benificial for early adopters. I can see how this, and the further potential growth of bitcoin would be quite compelling, especially when added to the idealism that surrounds the coin (for some).


back on topic:



I always stress that the whole "I missed the early adopters train" is BS. Anybody buying bitcoins today is still an early adopter. Look at the market, there are only $20M on the order book of the exchange that controls 80% of the market. The potential is HUGE, and we are at a very early stage. Understanding Bitcoins is time consuming. Buying for the first time is slow. Real economy is non existant, most of the revenues of BTC related business come from gambling, drugs or selling Bitcoin mining hardware. We are just at the gates of prime time.

I can guarantee you that those who bought bitcoins at $10 during the 2011 bear market where also repeating the same story about "early adopters". Just zoom out and look at the big picture.



293. Post 2102785 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: prophetx on May 10, 2013, 08:35:15 PM
My gut is screaming bull trap

My gut is screaming bull trap, bear market, capitulation, and bear trap all at the same time.


Getting mixed signals here.

Once, when asked about his gut feeling, Carl Sagan said: "I'd really rather not think with my gut, my brain does the job a lot better"  Grin

Don't prodigies and athletes use the least amount of brain power? In fact high level operation has often been (curiously) linked to lower brain activity. Perhaps this has something to do with the subconscious. Anyways, I'm sticking to what I thought 10 or so days ago: downtrend.

Edit: that being said... I'm getting super impatient.

This pretty much sums up the market at the moment. Everyone thinks they will be able to get cheaper coins... but the longer they wait, the less likely that becomes. Once the bids exceed the all time high (not far off), I can see a massive spell of panic buying ensuing.

I'm willing to buy back in at a loss, even if it makes me bleed out, it's been far too long for the case to be otherwise, however, I'm still kind of thinking that BTC is overvalued at the moment. I'm leaving emotion out of this. It seems like bulls are always the same, and while I'm not a bear I just can' see sustainable growth right now.

The Venture capital, techcrunch activity and China are all massive, massive indicators on a medium/ long term... which is why I'm surprised we are not seeing more activity. Seems many are like you, not noticing how big these impacts will be. When the products/ deals/ whatever they spawn are announced (or before they are announced), make no mistake, it will be vicious and many hoping for cheap coins will be left on the sidelines.

As you said those are all medium to long term plays, which means little incremental ups over a long extended period of time as milestones are met.  

Contrast that to Cyprus which was very short term, in your face, get your f--kin money out NOW! As that new flow came in, more people jumped on the band wagon.


See the difference?

Cyprus thing is a joke. That was just speculative mania. I will ask you something: have you invested significant money in Bitcoin? If the answer is yes, how long did it take from the first moment you heard about it?

Again: entering into Bitcoin is a lengthy process - first you have to understand, not only what is Bitcoin but also how to keep your bitcoins safe. Then you have to find out how to buy them, and then you slowly start pouring money, just a little a the beginning.

That's everybody's process. When it will come the day that the average citizen will have the understanding and the means to quickly throw a lot of fiat into Bitcoin after the kind of news we had in March, then.... Well, you cannot imagine the kind of huge motherfucking bubbles we are going to see.



294. Post 2103932 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on May 10, 2013, 10:34:56 PM
Ultrabull is the default character selection in the Bitcoin MMO. Pretty much everyone starts out as one. Grin

Yeah, the ones who convert to the perma-bear side are the ones who already significantly cashed out - those really feel their butt hurt.

 Grin



295. Post 2104655 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: solex on May 10, 2013, 11:56:05 PM
...

haha. that wasn't a prediction (except that I said I favored green scenario). If we include your grey scenario (sideways for a while in white area in my pic), what I layed out pretty much covered all possibilities. Easy to be correct then.

Although I prepared for a drop I must admit I'm pretty relieved we broke upwards. Initially (couple days ago) I had been quite certain move would be up, but had increasingly become worried about the possibilities red/yellow. Probably have been reading too many bear threads... really gets to you after a while.

Let's see how much momentum this has... who knows, maybe it's a bull-trap.


Agreed with your thinking. Also, there are so many people following TA that the spike might be driven by the trend-line watchers jumping in and momentum becomes self-fulfilling. A breakout usually retests support before taking off. Heading for a retest at the moment...


I would be surprised by too much action on this weekend.



296. Post 2111614 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: sarc on May 11, 2013, 03:51:01 PM
If it does not go back down I will not buy in ... it just seems too risky for me at this price whatever anyone wants to say about fundamentals, future growth etc ... I just can't bring myself to do it. If I miss the opportunity to ride the train so be it ... worse things have already happened in my life.


This is pretty much exactly what I told my girlfriend when she finally asked why she wasn't getting hourly bitcoin updates anymore!

Though obviously, her eyes had glazed over before I finished the first sentence...

Maybe you just do not understand the potential.

Think about what people was saying about $10 coins in 2011, after the bubble to $32

Chooooo chooooo

 Grin





297. Post 2112807 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 11, 2013, 03:22:05 PM
The idea that people are "slowly" fleeing the market and "slowly" panic selling and that it's just an extended collapse is turning into a bad punchline. The only people left saying that are people trying to get back in at a discount.

I agree with about the oxymoronic use of 'slow' panic  Cheesy ... that don't make much sense ...
However, I dont agree that anyone who wants to buy in at a lower level than this is trying to get in at a discount. There are a lot of assumptions in that. I know that is not exactly what you said, but similar things have been said by many people, so I am just pointing it out that it ain't necessarily so. I am sure there are people running round trying to scare people so they can buy cheaper something they believe to be worth more (I see them!). Some others amongst us just don't want to buy at these prices and see too much risk here and now.

Bitcoin has always being risky, hence the high rewards for the bold ones. Now is less risky than ever -  it was much riskier after the 2011 bubble,  when it looked like it was never going to recover.

The point is to get the cheapest coins possible in a certain time frame. But in absolute terms,  $115 coins is super cheap. If you really believe that these are expensive coins, it can only be because you think that Bitcoin will never develop further potential -  this was its peak in use.  

ATM, that looks as a foolish statement - if you really understand Bitcoin, you will see that you really cannot afford to lose the opportunity to invest in it.




298. Post 2113117 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: molecular on May 11, 2013, 06:09:13 PM
The idea that people are "slowly" fleeing the market and "slowly" panic selling and that it's just an extended collapse is turning into a bad punchline. The only people left saying that are people trying to get back in at a discount.

I agree with about the oxymoronic use of 'slow' panic  Cheesy ... that don't make much sense ...
However, I dont agree that anyone who wants to buy in at a lower level than this is trying to get in at a discount. There are a lot of assumptions in that. I know that is not exactly what you said, but similar things have been said by many people, so I am just pointing it out that it ain't necessarily so. I am sure there are people running round trying to scare people so they can buy cheaper something they believe to be worth more (I see them!). Some others amongst us just don't want to buy at these prices and see too much risk here and now.

In a bubble collapse, there are often bag holders who are wary to sell at a big loss so hang on for a while and those who attempt to double-down. I got involved in one once (on the advice of someone else. I should have known better) and watched as it took about four months for my shares to drop from 40c to 1c or so after the bust.

I don't think that's what's happening with Bitcoin at all but it's simply not necessarily the case that the deflation after a bubble burst is all that quick.

In the bubble burst from $32 to $2.50 I did not sell a single coin. Instead I've been buying increasingly more thinking: "you idiots, it's just bad press, the fundamentals are sound" and so on. A bit green behind the ears I was back then.

Of course in hindsight it would've been better to sell all and buy back in at $2.50.

On the other hand I recently talked to a guy I got to know in early 2011. He had been mining and sold everything in late 2011 only to discover bitcoin had gone to 3 digits. He now says: I won't buy, it's too expensive.

Just holding on to your coins is not the best thing to do, but not the worst thing either.


I also follow your strategy. Of course is better to sell at the peak and buy back at the bottom, but it's kind of gambling, and losing Bitcoin is always a big mistake - both fundamentals and past history show you that.

Fundamentals will tell you that Bitcoin has a huge potential and that it's stronger than ever, but they cannot help you to predict peaks or bottoms.

Thus, I tend to buy as much Btc as I can with the limited fiat I have, and I almost never sell . My strategy is to increase as much my BTC stash risking the fewer Btc I can. I already took my gamble, I gambled on Bitcoin. Won't gamble my Btc looking for a bottom.



299. Post 2114624 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

$500k just disappeared from the order book, all at once.

Somebody preparing for a dump? On a weekend? Or just too scared of a bearapocalypse on Monday?



300. Post 2119836 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: muyuu on May 12, 2013, 09:07:57 AM
I am speculating a solid dump by Monday and prices to go down to 80 ish

Last week people dreamed about 50, now it's 80. This is escalating quickly.

This.



301. Post 2120217 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Nice weekend mini-dump Cheesy



302. Post 2124481 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

$1M usd disappeared today from the order book.

We may see cheap coins soon  Grin



303. Post 2129128 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: samson on May 12, 2013, 11:57:07 PM
It can last weeks.

That's not very long in the grand scheme of things.

I beg to differ. Confidence is about knowing we won't tank. Compare with 2011. We're doing pretty good.

And what happens if we do tank?

The price will probably go down to sub $50 levels and eventually rebound after a period of consolidation.

It will be a very good buying opportunity but calling the real low won't be easy as there will be many lows with 'bounces' on the way down.

I'm convinced $50 was the bottom. It would be nice to be able to buy some $30 coins, but that's only wishful thinking. No more sub $50 coins I'm afraid



304. Post 2129149 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: notme on May 13, 2013, 12:14:20 AM
It can last weeks.

That's not very long in the grand scheme of things.

I beg to differ. Confidence is about knowing we won't tank. Compare with 2011. We're doing pretty good.

And what happens if we do tank?

The price will probably go down to sub $50 levels and eventually rebound after a period of consolidation.

It will be a very good buying opportunity but calling the real low won't be easy as there will be many lows with 'bounces' on the way down.

Fuck calling a bottom, buy every x% down.  If you want to get a better price and trust there will be a lot more downward movement, increase the order size at each level.

That's exactly what I do.



305. Post 2129489 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

We start the day with a nice bump




306. Post 2129821 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):




307. Post 2130049 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Pzi4nk on May 13, 2013, 09:43:11 AM
IF we do succeed then these prices will seem like nothing (do the math regarding the float). If we don't succeed then I'm sure we still took part in one of the greatest experiments in recent history. Think about that - governments and wealthy individuals have always controlled money. This is the first step away from that (that I can think of). Still nice to say, years from now, that you tried to do your part to change things.  And if things really take off, we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that it is truly all about sharing. I'm game when that time comes, we are all in this together. (Emphasis by Pzi4nk)

I like your overall message but I wonder about the part I highlighted. Do you really think bitcoin is immune from the manipulations of wealthy people, much less governments?

Not to be inflamitory but it seems to me wherever there's a market it can be manipulated by great wealth.

Its About Sharing is 100% right. I will answer you with a quote:

Quote
Give me control of a nations money supply, and I care not who makes it’s laws. Mater Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty.

The ones controlling the money supply are ruling de facto. Bitcoin takes that power away from them. And this is why, sooner or later, governments (which strictly follow the commands of the real rulers, the financial lobby) will try to destroy Bitcoin.



308. Post 2132488 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Richy_T on May 13, 2013, 03:52:17 PM

Pretty bad logic there. You move money into things of value, not the other way around. Don't try to catch a falling Knife...
The markets are up due to the Quantitative Easing funneling money into markets. They will print more but this can't keep up. Hence why BTC is up, a reflection of inflation (unlike manipulated gold/silver, which is only partially a reflection).

Money starts to move again in to BTC now.


I don't think there's anything that isn't a bearish sign to fourkey. I think he's wearing these:



Of course, he is shorting and in a world of pain ATM



309. Post 2132987 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 13, 2013, 04:42:28 PM
Bitcoin was trading at about $0.1175/mBTC when I posted my preliminary explanation of what happened in the summit.

What happened? I cannot understand a word. Everything ok?



310. Post 2133296 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 13, 2013, 05:03:11 PM
hello, you are back and alive! good so ...

but what do you mean?

and what happened at the summit?
you left people wondering (probably at purpose?)
that was not nice ...

What happened? I cannot understand a word. Everything ok?

Why are you people continuing to feed the vast hunger for drama of that guy? Sure, I enjoy his antics as much as anybody, but please tell me you weren't really worried for him. But okay, we're curious beasts...

Google Translate (pretty shitty translation for this language pair, by the way, but better than nothing) gives me the impression that a) they were defrauded or had their private keys stolen by hotel staff, and b) rptiela estimates the damage to be in the range of 100k btc (or, as he helpfully points out, about 9M Euro).

Sounds like quite the successful conference, I must say. /snark

Are you joking? And the private keys where in an unencrypted wallet on a macbook pro that had no security (access code, firmware password, etc. etc.) on it?

Man, I cannot believe this, but if it's true that the hotel staff were able to steal that huge amount of money (9M€ - WTF???) they are now reading these forums (where they got all the info to plan their stunt, BTW) and laughing out loud.

Anyhow, I still cannot believe this, rpietila: wtf?



311. Post 2133310 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

....and if this is true expect a massive dump of 100KBTC - that would takes at $70ish in the best scenario - not even counting the stop loss orders and general panic that would trigger. Man, a 100kBTC market dump could well take us to very low double digits.

If I were the hotel staff, I would dump the coins with a market order just to add insult to injury Cheesy



312. Post 2133404 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: FNG on May 13, 2013, 05:24:04 PM
....and if this is true expect a massive dump of 100KBTC - that would takes at $70ish in the best scenario - not even counting the stop loss orders and general panic that would trigger. Man, a 100kBTC market dump could well take us to very low double digits.

If I were the hotel staff, I would dump the coins with a market order just to add insult to injury Cheesy
Sounds like he's spewing BS to cap the price. Didn't he say something about his bitcoins are never even close to the same location at the same time..etc..etc

Mmmm... True. I kinda remind that. Hope Risto can update us, I tried to use google translate on the finnish text he posted but it's impossible to understand a thing, it looks like some BTC were stolen but they do not know how many, a macbook was in a sauna and the delegates were in the bath from 9:00 to 23:00, and that some other BTC may not be stolen but the private keys may be lost.

Boh, I really did not understand a word.



313. Post 2133816 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: DavidBAL on May 13, 2013, 06:06:59 PM
....and if this is true expect a massive dump of 100KBTC - that would takes at $70ish in the best scenario - not even counting the stop loss orders and general panic that would trigger. Man, a 100kBTC market dump could well take us to very low double digits.

If I were the hotel staff, I would dump the coins with a market order just to add insult to injury Cheesy

This is too unbeliveable, and in my mind probably FUD..
If no dump comes, than this story was clearly a lame attempt at relevance...

Of course is FUD - what did you think this thread was all about?

Cheesy



314. Post 2133826 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: wilfried on May 13, 2013, 06:05:37 PM
replikia,  pm me,  otherwise i cant help you,  cause youre on my ignore list

Post of the day



315. Post 2134695 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

All that makes no sense

Its Finland, no one will steal his computer in a fancy hotel if they did not know about a huge reward in it
If the funds did not move, you do not announce publicly that they are there, unprotected
Moving BTC to new addresses do not cost "thousands of dollars"

I think this is just a funny way of whoring attention, and telling people how many bitcoins he dreams to have.

BTW, he always said he had 2Kish coins, and super well secured - didn't he?



316. Post 2135976 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 13, 2013, 04:42:28 PM
Bitcoin was trading at about $0.1175/mBTC when I posted my preliminary explanation of what happened in the summit.

The guy really needs attention, he feels the urge to promote his delusions and fairy tales in this thread

Quote from: rpietila on May 13, 2013, 08:56:37 PM
big sell wall pushing the price down.  Is it a short and distort?
Its an Idiot Wall. Either an idiot trying to push the price down, or an idiot thinking they were 'selling into (non-existent) strength' when it was rising up to 118, hahaha. Seems more likely to be someone trying to push it down.

You can't speculatively (profitably) long bitcoins, you can only short. So it's probably some supernode trying their capabilities (American likely), but I will be impressed only after breaching $.11. If I can do $.119->$.09752 in 3 days, surely others can do even better!  Grin

Just check this shit. What I find amazing is that there is people that take this guy half seriously




317. Post 2135988 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on May 13, 2013, 09:22:00 PM
big sell wall pushing the price down.  Is it a short and distort?
Its an Idiot Wall. Either an idiot trying to push the price down, or an idiot thinking they were 'selling into (non-existent) strength' when it was rising up to 118, hahaha. Seems more likely to be someone trying to push it down.

You can't speculatively (profitably) long bitcoins, you can only short. So it's probably some supernode trying their capabilities (American likely), but I will be impressed only after breaching $.11. If I can do $.119->$.09752 in 3 days, surely others can do even better!  Grin

Um, you mention the word 'supernode' quite often but I don't understand what you mean by it.

Quote
0.0th class supernode = BTC1M
0.5th class supernode = BTC100,000
1.0st class supernode = BTC10,000
1.5th class supernode = BTC3,000
2.0nd class supernode = BTC1,000
2.5th class supernode = BTC300
3.0th class supernode = BTC100



318. Post 2136163 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 13, 2013, 10:03:02 PM
MtGox still down?  Angry

Yep, down for me



319. Post 2136423 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Rampion on May 04, 2013, 10:13:14 PM
but I know that $300k per 1 BTC is delusional
To not believe in $300k this year is a denial of the facts. Only a technical flaw in the algorithm or a superstealthfast adoption of a superior altcoin currently not existing, or an all-out wiping away of all mankind can keep USD/BTC from exploding this year. Already everyone who has any position in this world knows about Bitcoin. Just post any nugget of actual facts that can contradict my $300k this year or cease replying to me with nothing material, thank you.

Ok man, accept the bet.

Accept it or STFU



320. Post 2141221 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 14, 2013, 08:23:40 AM
Just as a sidenote, do you also regard Goat as evil, solely because he is rich?

I do not think you are evil.

I think you are a) delusional and b) foolish. You think you are much smarter than you really are, which is a big problem.

And I personally believe that you and Goat have nothing in common.



321. Post 2141260 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Investors and speculators may very soon get tired of waiting for cheaper coins.

Fiat on the order book is growing, we are at its highest peak in the last 15 days - and very close to ATH




322. Post 2141378 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 14, 2013, 08:37:50 AM

I have been watching that as well, very bullish, my guy still tells me lower prices though.

However I have been wrong before :/

There's still quite a big selling pressure in a small range ($118 - $125). I still think that it's very likely that we will soon see $100 - $115 prices, and it's also possible that we test the first real strong support level at $90 - but I only give 30% of chances for sub $100 coins to happen soon.

Anyhow, this market is so small that a few small dumps can really shake the price.




323. Post 2143251 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Bears are stepping back, they fear a bloodshed

Bulls strengthening their positions, almost $22M in Gox's order book.




324. Post 2145106 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

It should be about time to start chewing that BTC4k ask wall at $120




325. Post 2145953 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 14, 2013, 05:16:47 PM
i think we should hold here for a while, lets enjoy the nice wall at 120   Wink
stable bits FOREVER!  Cheesy

Well, this is better than stable. In the last 7 days we went from $105ish to $119. That's going UP 14% in 7 days. Wink




326. Post 2147252 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: ronaldlee0917 on May 14, 2013, 07:10:47 PM
http://gigaom.com/2013/05/14/google-ventures-invests-in-opencoin-the-firm-behind-bitcoin-exchange-ripple/

Is this a good news or bad news to Bitcoin?
Google Ventures has decided to invest in Ripple.
It is a good news because Ripple facilitates conversion between bitcoins and traditional currencies, which should aid mass adoption of Bitcoins.
Bad news because many people believe Ripple is Bitcoin 2.0 and threatens the existence of Bitcoin.

Ripple may be good for BTC in the short term, but neutral mid and long term. It's a just a p2p expression of the old banking system, with all his flaws that Bitcoin was designed to address:



You will see that all these points can be summed up in only one word: trust; the very first thing mentioned in the Bitcoin wiki, and the very thing that Bitcoin addresses.



327. Post 2147475 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on May 14, 2013, 07:36:30 PM
  • Ripple is centralized
  • Ripple is no store of value - XRP's are controlled (and premined) by OpenCoin
  • Ripple is debt based (you are not transferring assets like in BTC, you are transferring debt)
  • Ripple implies that you trust a series of gateways, which is totally contrary at the core value of Bitcoin (no need to trust any third party)

1 and 2: They claim to change this soon.

3: Wrong, Ripples are the same as Bitcoins in that respect. They are not subject to any counterparty, and they have no underlying value besides a Ripple denomination with floating exchange rates.

4: This is only the case for any other currency except for Ripples within the Ripple system, and that includes Bitcoins same as Dollars. Which is why Ripple will kill Bitcoin if it is adopted significantly.

You guys need to learn a thing or two before teaching others, I keep reading all these misconceptions.

1 and 2: That will change? They may release the source code, but what are they doing with the XRP's they premined?

About debt: when you transfer your $ inside the Ripple system, your are just exchanging IOU's. And nothing stops a Ripple supernode (lol, I couldn't help myself) from issuing more IOU's than he can cover. It's just fake "paper" money again, in its digital form.

Personally I dislike Ripple and I hope it fails hard. I see it as an opportunistic way to profit from Bitcoin's genius idea, while spoiling it from its revolutionary proposals (one of them is mining, and there are many others).

I grant you that maybe I was overly optimistic we I said "neutral mid and long term". In other posts I also acknowledged that Ripple idea is clever, and it has the potential to undermine Bitcoin adoption. But frankly, I believe there will be a lot of people like you and me who will still see Ripples flaws, and will prefer to stay with Bitcoin - or with another superior cryptocurrency, which is not Ripple in any case.



328. Post 2147537 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Here we go Smiley

Man, the market reacted fast to the dwolla news, new guys in the game panic hard

CHEAP COINS FOR ALL Cheesy



329. Post 2147555 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

"How deep is your love"

Cheesy



330. Post 2149090 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Huge drop in the bid sum




331. Post 2149313 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 14, 2013, 10:09:36 PM

Before homeland gets me... i am selling mine ... and also after this news, there will be panic selling, so its best to cash in the profit NOW!!

I can understand that we could use some fear to get cheaper coins... But man, your scare tactics are laughable Cheesy



332. Post 2149370 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on May 14, 2013, 10:13:21 PM
I keep on wondering whether all these buys are due to bottom-catchers fishing cheap coins or due to people scared by DHS news converting their fiat to coins and moving them out of Gox in a hurry...

Well, I'm sure we have a little bit of both.



333. Post 2152931 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: BTCThousandaire on May 15, 2013, 05:55:31 AM
How are you traders doing with this volatility?

I sold a few at 113 and could have bought in for 1.5 BTC profit, but barely missed it and only made .2 after panic buying before it got back to close to 113.

Made a 4.7% profit

And waiting to buy some at $100ish, and to buy big time sub $100

The Dwolla situation could scare the ass off some overinvested folks with trembling hands, anyhow this can improve a lot or get really worse depending on the next DHS move/explanation.

And from a practical point of view, you just do not convert an unseizable currency to one that will be likely be frozen. I never used Dwolla, but if I did last thing I would want is to get rid of my BTC for good at this moment, I guess people is just speculating that price will drop on these news and they want to buy back cheaper.



334. Post 2154314 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

$4M disappeared from the order book after the Dwolla news (one just came back)

There's people that really gets scared easily.




335. Post 2154324 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Anyhow, you can see how no coins rushed to the exchange after the Dwolla news. Fiat rushed out, but BTC did not rush in - which makes sense, if you use Dwolla there's no point in exchanging your un-seizable currency for seizable fiat.



336. Post 2154397 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 15, 2013, 10:20:21 AM
Anyhow, you can see how no coins rushed to the exchange after the Dwolla news. Fiat rushed out, but BTC did not rush in - which makes sense, if you use Dwolla there's no point in exchanging your un-seizable currency for seizable fiat.

There is if you don't like losing money as BTC prices fall and you want to buy low. Fiat is fine inside of Dwolla, for the moment.  There is nothing illegal about Dwolla.  They are in compliance of US regulations.  (Or so it seems)  But this series of recent comments is really two different conversations.  One of those who want to stash BTC in wallets and go long.  Totally fine and those who want to make money buying in low.  Also fine.  Apples and oranges really.

Additionally, the don't have to "seize" BTC's.  All they have to do is block the flow of fiat in and out, and BTC's becomes worthless.  How some people are waking up trying to hold on to these delusions is simply amazing.  I call it denial.  Bitcoin is only as strong as the fiat it can be converted into. 

There is nothing illegal about Dwolla? There is nothing illegal about BTC neither.

If you do not see how this kind of news just make stronger Bitcoin in the long term, it has to be because you understand nothing about how BTC works.

You forget there's a lot of people who is not into BTC to get fiat profits. And you also forget USA is not "the world". FED fucking around with BTC? Yeah, that's expected. From the very first moment.






337. Post 2154490 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 15, 2013, 10:32:33 AM
As the US goes, so goes the rest of the world.

The rest of western world. Which is not "the world".

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 15, 2013, 10:32:33 AM
Bitcoin is in violation of the laws of nearly every country.  Now I

That's utter BS. Can you show me how is bitcoin violating the laws of Italy, Russia, China, Sweden, Iran, Japan... Just to have a few examples. Be concrete, if you are so sure.

And yes, in the US you have some negative precedent (the e-gold thing, liberty dollar, etc.) - but again, the US is not "the rest of the world".



338. Post 2154500 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 15, 2013, 10:48:33 AM
And no, Dwolla is not illegal, where as Bitcoin is in violation of the laws of nearly every country.

Bitcoin is not in violation of any laws in most countries. That is, as far as I know, it is perfectly legal to own, buy and sell Bitcoins in most of the world. Many things that can be, and are being, done with Bitcoins ARE in violation of laws, though.

Im not a law expert so grant me that.  But in most developed countries, sending anonymous payments to anonymous users, tax free, and/or using an alternate currency within those borders is absolutely a violation of law.  It is in the US for sure.

So you really do not understand how BTC works.

BTC is "pseudoanonymous" (not anonymous). Additionally, all the transactions are public. Legitimate business transactions can be very easily tracked, much easier than with cash.

And BTW: cash has very similar properties to BTC - and if you operate only in cash you can also be "tax free". Which obviously does not means that cash is illegal.



339. Post 2156919 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: ManBearPig on May 15, 2013, 02:46:35 PM
I was pondering like, as you do, what the continuation of higher lows would look like and I concluded that the obvious next data point would be a bounce off $100. Hey presto, yesterday happened.

It looks a little early though thanks to the weak hands selling the news so I think we'll see a double bottom in the next couple of days. Every day we hold above $100 into May is a point for the bulls I believe:



Linear not log as usual bear in mind.

Completely agree with you. The fact that we did not went to double digits right after the Dwolla news spreaded is a super-bullish signal IMO. This is the type of news that FUD spreaders and trolls love - they will say that this is "the first of many government actions against Bitcoin", that BTC will be taken down and its users will be ass-raped in Guantanamo bay.... And STILL Bitcoin is trading above $110 ATM, and the $100 support was barely tested.

And look, money in the order book is going up, like nothing happened:




340. Post 2156946 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.58h):

Quote from: Kazu on May 15, 2013, 03:36:36 PM


This chart is the definition of trolling (the lower one).

Care to elaborate?



341. Post 2169026 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Coinseeker, do you want cheap coins? Buy now, and if you're really greedy you can still have some fiat on the exchange in case we are all lucky and another Dwolla-like situation provokes some panic among noobs and hence a flash crash.

Wake up man, the train is leaving the station.



342. Post 2169354 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 16, 2013, 02:49:50 PM
Maybe this is just the arrogant American in me but, without America, Bitcoin is little more than frequent flyer miles.  We set the trends, we say what's hot and what's not.  Russia?  When's the last time anything "cool" ever came out of Russia besides snow?   Grin  

Don't forget, America is not America without Russian software engineers, for example. Also, Sergey Brin, Google co-founder, comes from Russia.

Google hardly makes "America".  Thats as silly as saying there's no America without Apple.   Grin  

Coinseeker, we've been tolerating your FUD spreading and trolling, but you are really pushing it.

Bitcoin without the USA is no more than frequent flyer miles? "You" set the trends?

What you are saying is beyond stupid.  To how many countries have you traveled in your life? What do you know about economy? Do you by chance know the growth % of countries like Russia or China?

You know nothing Coinseeker. Nothing about Bitcoin. Nothing about economics. Nothing about the reality we are heading to.

And you're stupid and superficial American nationalism is an insult to intelligence.

And regarding "all the cools things come from US": make a poll among citizens of all nationalities and ask which is the country doing the uncoolest things ATM. You will surprised by the results. Hint: Guantanamo, drones and so on.



343. Post 2169794 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 16, 2013, 03:25:42 PM
Where the hell is rpietila? I demand some balance in this thread. Also he was way more entertaining than this.

Apparently, in a psychiatric hospital.


And @Coinseeker: I am pretty sure Cryptocurrencies will outlive America  Grin

"I am currently detained in a psychiatric institution in Helsinki, because I need rest. My physical well-being is taken care of."


yeah, silver in free fall might not be good for him i guess.

Wow,  he actually wrote that. It's clear to me the guy suffers from a textbook "delusion of grandeur", and I'm sure half of this ramblings are just delusions and lies.

As Blitz said, "a crazy guy going nuts"

Honestly, I feel sorry for Rontus (his employee)



344. Post 2178194 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 17, 2013, 05:04:44 AM
Sorry to steal the show, but even after spending 36 hours in an emergency care unit, I still think $1,000+ peak valuation is unstoppable before Christmas. My experiences tell that even the patients here are eager to buy by the truckload, as soon as they get into the position to do so. Not everyone was picked when he had all his belongings packed to two nice cabin bags (+the silver).

You said $300k before the end of the year, and anybody denying this will happen in 2013 is a fool and an ignorant. But still you did not accept to put your money where your mouth is accepting my bet proposal with odds on your favor.



345. Post 2178487 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: lebing on May 17, 2013, 08:17:32 AM
  However in this instance I think we could see negative repercussions of the Dwolla/mtgox episode rumble on for some time yet.

Its clear that the dwolla mtgox episode will affect the market for some time, but I'm curious what makes you think it will be negative? In the short term, I believe it will push the price up and in the long term provide a new price discovery mechanism (at the moment unknown what exactly that will be) along with much needed diversity on the exchanges.

I believe the panic triggered bu the Dwolla situation is pretty much over, unless the DHS states that this was a first action against Bitcoin itself, and not against a specific user or against gambling, which are two things not directly related to BTC.

Not going to double digits after the initial Dwolla/MtGox FUD is an über-bullish sign.

Bulls are strong, bears are crapping their pants, and most of the members in here already sold their BTC (at least some of them) and they are waiting "the best entry point". Heck, even Smoothie sold some BTC and is waiting to buy back, IMO this means that NOW is a good entry point - maybe not the best in the short term, but I really do not see how we could be going under $90 unless something really bad happens.




346. Post 2178489 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):




347. Post 2178520 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: rpietila on May 17, 2013, 05:04:44 AM
Sorry to steal the show, but even after spending 36 hours in an emergency care unit, I still think $1,000+ peak valuation is unstoppable before Christmas. My experiences tell that even the patients here are eager to buy by the truckload, as soon as they get into the position to do so. Not everyone was picked when he had all his belongings packed to two nice cabin bags (+the silver).

Care to let us know what are your symptoms and pathology in your doctor's opinion?

Hope you get better BTW.



348. Post 2179903 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Well, with the last market buy I did at $116ish a few ours ago I'm now 90% in.

So.... Go bulls, go! Smiley



349. Post 2180933 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: epetroel on May 17, 2013, 01:46:06 PM
you still have a $1,000 daily limit with that, you need some notoarized crap to raise it

If you are verified you can submit a support request an increase to your daily limit up to $10,000 per day (no notarized crap required).  You are still subject to a $50,000 monthly limit though.

The notarized/apostilled docs are required to move the $50,000 monthly limit up to $500,000.  

This is exactly how it is. Big money already has their "notarized crap" done and uses wire transfers. Dwolla is for small fishes.

Without notarizing anything you can still get $10k per day and $50k per month



350. Post 2182052 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Wallzilla is back




351. Post 2182064 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Testing $120 big time




352. Post 2182074 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Just check how the almost $1M wall appearead on the order book




353. Post 2182087 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):




354. Post 2182252 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

If Wallzilla wants to keep pushing up the price, he needs to move his wall to $119... Or maybe that bid wall is legit? Cheesy



355. Post 2182276 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: ardana123 on May 17, 2013, 04:32:40 PM
seems to me bitstamp likes dropping over rising

It's just that the Dwolla users + the extra paranoid want to cash out through Bitstamp while avoiding Gox - that's why the ask sum went down so deeply at Gox, while increased sharply at Bitstamp.

Just check Bitstamp's selling pressure, crazy shit:




356. Post 2182326 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Fuck, a whale just removed BTC10k from the ask side

Insider information about Gox to be shutted down soon?

Ok, I know, that's just braindead FUD, but at the end of the day we need a little FUD on this thread Cheesy




357. Post 2182340 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Fiat on the Gox order book super close to ATH ($23M)

BTC on the Gox order book vanishing very fast



358. Post 2182376 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: michaelGedi on May 17, 2013, 04:46:13 PM
hmmmm, I trade on bitstamp, this smells a bit funny...

any new announcements re dwolla etc?

Nothing new, but there are definitely interesting moves, especially after we had that kind of news. We can see a lot of BTC leaving Gox, a lot of BTC reaching Bitstamp (but not as many as are leaving Gox), and still the gran majority of the fiat is at Gox - and increasing.




359. Post 2182390 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: micalith on May 17, 2013, 04:49:49 PM
is it normal that the $118 wall is showing up in all currencies on mtgox? I got the impression each currency had its own exchange

No, otherwise other currencies would have a too small liquidity.



360. Post 2182484 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 17, 2013, 04:56:25 PM


choo choo motherfucker!!

Did you buy back my friend?

I have to quote something that fitty posted a while ago and that really made me crack my ass laughing:

Quote from: fitty on May 10, 2013, 01:19:02 PM
I'm a bear in denial.

There is nothing worse then a bear sitting on the sidelines, pockets full of fiat, feeling lonely because everyone left him behind.

Good news is, there's no shame in buying in, long term looks fantastic, a little bumpy in the short term, but there are enough cool gifs in this thread to keep you happy (and a few charts with lines n shit).




361. Post 2182687 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: samson on May 17, 2013, 05:07:18 PM
It seems like Bitstamp clearly doesn't give a shit right about now...

It looks like the gap between mtgox and bitstamp will widen increasingly until in a few days or weeks when/if mtgox pulls through and isn't shut down, and the dwolla-reaction BTC rushes back in, bitcoin blasts off whilst mtgox suffers a major correction. Damn I wish I had a USD bank account for the arbitrage

LOL. WTF ? Were you seriously expecting MtGox to be shut down ?

They are not in the US, US law doesn't apply in Japan. Get real.

Well, the truth is that Japan is not Russia - I mean they would pretty much do what the US says. Still, I do not think that there is a big risk that Gox will be shut down in the next few days.

There's always been a risk of exchanges being shut down. Bitcoin undermines the status quo of the powerful, thus an attack/hostile attitude from Governments is expected from the very beginning. Actually till now we had too "friendly" attitude toward Bitcoin, but is foolish to believe that the FED won't fight back cryptos at some point.

That said, is also foolish to overreact to the Dwolla situation. The chance of Gox being shut down today is pretty much the same of Gox being shut down two weeks ago. If it happens, will happen suddenly - without prior notice. That is one of the many reasons why Bitcoin is a high-risk investment, everybody should understand that the Bitcoin thing is a gamble, because of many aspects of it.



362. Post 2183012 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Look how the coins vanish from the order book




363. Post 2183102 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on May 17, 2013, 05:53:13 PM
Look how the coins vanish from the order book



Still the dilemma is there to me. Are BTCs disappearing from order book because Dwolla/DHS or because people unsure where the rally will end this time?

Probably is both things. And at the end of the day, what's the difference? Coins are disappearing from Gox quite fast, and not as many are appearing at Bitstamp. On the other side, fiat is near ATH ($23M).



364. Post 2195400 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Good times for buyers at Bitstamp. Way too many coins in there for the fiat in the order book.



365. Post 2198805 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Super low volume, even for a weekend.



366. Post 2201488 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Its Sunday, not much to speculate.



367. Post 2201631 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Somebody just dumped +BTC3k



368. Post 2203869 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Nice chart, buddy!



369. Post 2209003 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Volume at Gox is so small it is almost scary



370. Post 2212729 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on May 20, 2013, 05:12:41 PM
If we look at the market cap of ripple (which now apparently is TWICE that of bitcoin), we're only decimal shifting away from the price of bitcoin exploding. The human psyche is interesting. The same applies to alternative currencies. It's like if people are unable to think in anything but units. "Oh, 1 BTC costs $122, that's very costly". Yet, ripple costs twice that, if you where to divide by total units. Pretty ridiculous, and a very good reason to adapt mBTC.

A similar effect could even be accomplished by multiplying all bitcoins in existence with say 100x. So everyone who now owns 1 BTC will suddenly own 100 BTC, with a limt of 2100 million instead of 21 million. There is no difference, but I'm convinced the psychological effect of a change like this would cause massive increase in the price.

The evidence is right in front of our eyes, ripple has nowhere the same adaption as bitcoin.

What's happening with Ripple is a joke. A couple of months ago they gave away 50K to anybody with a bitcointalk.org account who asked for it. A lot of members bought forum accounts, and have accumulated hundreds of thousand/millions of XRP.

Today, $1 buys you roughly 50 Ripples - that means that the Ripple founders just "gave away" $1,000 to everybody who asked for them a couple of months ago, and they are sitting on +$1B potential profit at this very moment - with their buggy software in early Beta, with only a trusted Gateway in the system (Bitstamp) and without having proved anything (there's a lot of security concernes that need to be tested). Obviously the $1,5B market cap is just "theory", because there is no market for 100B Ripples ATM, but it illustrates how crazy is this shit, and how rich the OpenCoin founders can become with their business model.

Even if Ripple is "half a failure", they will be all set for life. IMO it's an horrible product from a philosophic point of view (actually it allows anyone to create "money out of thin air" through IOU's, I can foresee epic scams coming, everybody can be a bank running fractional reserve), but it is a BRILLIANT idea for their creators.. It's the ultimate get-rich-quick scheme.... But only for them.

As soon as they want to cash out, they will destroy the market - heck, they say the will hold onto 20% of the total currency that will ever be created. And now tell me about the FED. They are the ultimate centralized power.



371. Post 2213134 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on May 20, 2013, 05:42:28 PM
If we look at the market cap of ripple (which now apparently is TWICE that of bitcoin), we're only decimal shifting away from the price of bitcoin exploding. The human psyche is interesting. The same applies to alternative currencies. It's like if people are unable to think in anything but units. "Oh, 1 BTC costs $122, that's very costly". Yet, ripple costs twice that, if you where to divide by total units. Pretty ridiculous, and a very good reason to adapt mBTC.

A similar effect could even be accomplished by multiplying all bitcoins in existence with say 100x. So everyone who now owns 1 BTC will suddenly own 100 BTC, with a limt of 2100 million instead of 21 million. There is no difference, but I'm convinced the psychological effect of a change like this would cause massive increase in the price.

The evidence is right in front of our eyes, ripple has nowhere the same adaption as bitcoin.

What's happening with Ripple is a joke. A couple of months ago they gave away 50K to anybody with a bitcointalk.org account who asked for it. A lot of members bought forum accounts, and have accumulated hundreds of thousand/millions of XRP.

Today, $1 buys you roughly 50 Ripples - that means that the Ripple founders just "gave away" $1,000 to everybody who asked for them a couple of months ago, and they are sitting on +$1B potential profit at this very moment - with their buggy software in early Beta, with only a trusted Gateway in the system (Bitstamp) and without having proved anything (there's a lot of security concernes that need to be tested). Obviously the $1,5B market cap is just "theory", because there is no market for 100B Ripples ATM, but it illustrates how crazy is this shit, and how rich the OpenCoin founders can become with their business model.

Even if Ripple is "half a failure", they will be all set for life. IMO it's an horrible product from a philosophic point of view (actually it allows anyone to create "money out of thin air" through IOU's, I can foresee epic scams coming, everybody can be a bank running fractional reserve), but it is a BRILLIANT idea for their creators.. It's the ultimate get-rich-quick scheme.... But only for them.

As soon as they want to cash out, they will destroy the market - heck, they say the will hold onto 20% of the total currency that will ever be created. And now tell me about the FED. They are the ultimate centralized power.
+1

But why? god why are people paying that much? It's not possible to justify such massive market cap when bitcoin, which has been here for years and has countless merchants, is worth less. It must be purely human psyche at play. People are unable to differentiate between units of different market caps and it leads to it being ridiculously overpriced.

There are people getting rich here, without bringing much value to the table. I'm definitivly not buying ripples any time soon.

Because people love get-rich-quick schemes, and they do not realize that it's stupid to play a game where a single entity controls all the cards (the Ripples, controlled by OpenCoin). The game is rigged, it's simply the opposite of Bitcoin.

Everybody buying Ripples think they will be so smart that they will be the first in, the first out - so they will profit from the pump before the dump.

But I really do not understand how Bitcoin supporters can also support Ripple. Ripple is everything Bitcoin fights: centralized, based on debt, allows anybody to run spiral-of-debt scams, fractional reserve games... Heck, in fact what Ripple does is bringing to the average Joe the possibility to run their own debt-based scam, in the same form as traditional banks do.

Check what's happening in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=206948.0

TradeFortress, in a genius move, is exposing what I'm explaining: he is creating money out of thin air (455 BTC up to now), money he is giving away, but that he could have actually used to buy goods. Yeah, the fools are the ones granting to him the trust for him to act as a Gateway, but this will happen over and over: in Ripple you can work on your trust, have people trusting you X amount, and you can create debt out of that shit, then default and disappear - as banks do, but with Ripple you can do it in a "distributed" way. What a JOKE.

Check it out, the first fool lost 10.5 REAL blockchain BTC and now he is left holding IOU's - good luck with that, we can see that he is in fact he first Ripple user to be "left holding the bag".

My opinion:

fuck get-rich-quick schemes, fuck premined scams
fuck "paper" money, fuck IOU's, fuck debt: we want REAL money in its digital form, and this is why Bitcoin was created

EDIT: 1 Bitcoin is 1 Bitcoin - it has to be in the blockchain. Bitcoin in Ripple is not Bitcoin, is just debt. I wonder what Satoshi would say about this.



372. Post 2213389 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 20, 2013, 06:09:01 PM
Tradeforest is a fraud who in all his insecurities is completely afraid of Ripple.  He knows the flaws of Bitcoin, as do many of you, and it frightens him and many of you, that Ripple has aimed to fix them.  

Also, if you're going to explain Ripple, at least do it with integrity.  Ripple is still in beta and will be decentralized upon release of the server source code.  Sure, they render your mining efforts useless and for good reason but to flat out lie about Ripple either shows you don't know what you're talking about or you too are afraid of Ripple because of the deep seeded insecurities, that lie with the flaws of Bitcoin. That which the Bitcoin community refuses to address.  As they say, you snooze you loose and never is this more true than in the world of technology.

I'm quite sure you are into Bitcoin only because you are into get-rich-quick schemes, and that's why I'm sure you are also holding Ripples.

But you do not understand Bitcoin is a revolution - a movement. It is about being debt-free, about saying fuck off to fractional reserve. Is about holding a real asset and not debt-backed valueless paper.

Ripple is just taking the old banking system (which is just accounting and debt transfers) to a distributed level, while introduces its very own premined currency.

From one side, in Ripple you have "the old banking system" in his distributed version: which is a debt-based scam that allows anybody to create money from thin air, while the weakest links are left holding the bag. Nothing new under the sun.

From the other side, you have the "cryptocurrency" inside Ripple, the XRP: which is just a premined scam, where ALL the coins have been created by a private entity for its own profit. OpenCoin will distribute their crypto as they wish, hoping that it will increase in value because everything else in Ripple is just "paper scams".

It's the third time I tell you, Coinseeker: you do not understand Bitcoin. You do not understand its deep revolutionary implications. Bitcoin is meant to set you free, while Ripple is meant for their creators to be rich.

Bitcoin solves a huge problem in money transfer: TRUST. You only need to trust maths in Bitcoin. With Ripple, is the opposite - you have to blindly trust a lot of things.



373. Post 2213549 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 20, 2013, 06:22:45 PM
Quote
Ripple
i think we all should do some home work

from what i've read ripple can become a powerful tool. and bitcoin would be better off if every bitcoiner knew exactly what it is all about and how to use it.

I really did the last days.

I also spent REAL money (10BTC) to buy some K's of XRPs, just to test their bult-in trade system.

And I'm convinced it's a fucked up system.

Not because is not useful (it is useful)

Bad because it is:

a) everything Bitcoin was designed to address (trust-based system, WTF man? Bitcoin very first purpose is to address the need of trust in money transmitting)
b) a premined scam

And no, Adam, NO: it won't do any good to Bitcoin. Users of Ripple may realize that the fiat currencies their are exchanging are just valueless IOU0's, a debt ticking-bomb about to explode, so they may prefer the crypto, as we prefer BTC to USD - but the crypto they will prefer is XRP, 100% premined by a private company.

Trust the blockchain, trust your private keys, trust bitcoin. Not a private coin on a system based on trusting third-parties (firstly and foremost OpenCoin; then, your Gateways).

And think about this: OpenCoin will hold to 50% of the total Ripples created. You need to grant them a LOT of trust to place money in XRPs. They can crash the market with a fart, and they may be very well decide to hold onto 80% on the XRPs. Or to 90%. They won't tell you, because they don't know, they will just do what it suits best to them.

Now compare that shit with BTC, my friend.



374. Post 2213692 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Look at the market depth in the Ripple trade system.

It's a joke.

Total ask sum (BTC/XRP Bitstamp) is less than BTC600 BTC

In EUR there's no market yet.

In USD, almost nothing... With $200,000 you can buy all the bids till 1 XRP = $1, and that's only because a joker has placed a bid of aprox. $150,000 at $1/XRP

So, spend $200,000 and the XRP price will skyrocket from 50 XRP per dollar to 1/1. And there you have your $100,000,000,000 market cap

Just a fucking joke, pump and dump games, pigs getting slaughtered, etc. etc. etc.



375. Post 2213708 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: moocowpong1 on May 20, 2013, 06:46:55 PM

And think about this: OpenCoin will hold to 50% of the total Ripples created. You need to grant them a LOT of trust to place money in XRPs. They can crash the market with a fart, and they may be very well decide to hold onto 80% on the XRPs. Or to 90%. They won't tell you, because they don't know, they will just do what it suits best to them.

Now compare that shit with BTC, my friend.

You only need to trust them if you hold XRP. Who cares if the XRP market crashes when you're using Ripple as a distributed cryptocurrency exchange?

What are you talking about? You do not exchange cryptocurrency in Ripple. You exchange a) XRP's or b) other cryptocurrencies IOU's

IOU's which owner can default or decide not to honor them. Only thing which is not an IOU in Ripple are Ripples - quite convenient for OpenCoin, don't you think so?



376. Post 2213727 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 20, 2013, 06:40:09 PM
Quote
Ripple
i think we all should do some home work

from what i've read ripple can become a powerful tool. and bitcoin would be better off if every bitcoiner knew exactly what it is all about and how to use it.

 

I'm not claiming to have full technical knowledge of Ripple (but neither do I have that level of knowledge of Bitcoin), but I do know enough about it to believe that the arguments in defense of it all seemed to ignore one basic problem many bitcoin followers have: it's centralized, and there is no indication that this will ever change.

Rampion's post is an excellent summary of why I don't trust, and don't feel like supporting Ripple (I agree with everything except the last paragraph about the founders "cashing out". They will never do such a thing, as it would instaneously destroy their wealth in the process).

If you feel that anyone who's critical of Ripple is just (consciously or not) trying to defend his own get-rich stake in Bitcoin, then I guess I can't really argue any further.

Oda, I know it's unlikely they will suddenly "cash out" - it's just an extreme example of how much trust you have to place in OpenCoin to hold Ripples.

We all know that the very first Bitcoin purpose is to solve the trust issue.



377. Post 2213822 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 20, 2013, 06:51:13 PM

And think about this: OpenCoin will hold to 50% of the total Ripples created. You need to grant them a LOT of trust to place money in XRPs. They can crash the market with a fart, and they may be very well decide to hold onto 80% on the XRPs. Or to 90%. They won't tell you, because they don't know, they will just do what it suits best to them.

Now compare that shit with BTC, my friend.

You only need to trust them if you hold XRP. Who cares if the XRP market crashes when you're using Ripple as a distributed cryptocurrency exchange?

What are you talking about? You do not exchange cryptocurrency in Ripple. You exchange a) XRP's or b) other cryptocurrencies IOU's

IOU's which owner can default or decide not to honor them. Only thing which is not an IOU in Ripple are Ripples - quite convenient for OpenCoin, don't you think so?

You have no idea what you're talking about.  You're just regurgitating Tradeforest talking posts and you're not even doing a good job of it.   Roll Eyes

Sorry? I'm using Ripple. I've been trading real money in there, as I wanted to understand it. I sent REAL BTC to Bitstamp, and they sent me BTC IOU's to Ripple. Yeah, my BTC never left the Bitstamp BTC address - they are holding them, and they sent BTC IOU's to Ripple, but they can actually do whatever they want with my BTC. They can spend them, and I would still have the BTC IOU's on Ripple. Then, Bitstamp can decide if they honor or not the IOU's they sent to my Ripple address.

Yeah: welcome to fractional reserve, welcome to creating money out of thin air.

After receiving my BTC IOU's from Bitstamp, I exchanged them for USD IOU's - and then exchanged the USD IOU's for Ripples.

The only asset you hold in Ripple are Ripples. The rest, is debt (IOU's), which issuer can decide to honor or not.



378. Post 2213923 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on May 20, 2013, 07:01:45 PM
I have to say that after being at the conference, talking with the Ripple guys (who did a really valient job of trying to explain to everyone how it works) I still don't understand how it works. To my credit, most people at the conference said they don't understand it. Including some of the core bitcoin dev's and a number of other talented programmers in the bitcoin world. Indeed, no one I spoke to said they really understood how it work.

 So, to quote one guy at the conference: "It should make you nervous that you don't understand it".

That's my position on it for now. Speculatively it looks interesting, but the fact that I don't understand it, and guys much smarter and more experienced then myself don't understand it, makes me skeptical of it's future.

Man, I now understand it very well. It's a reproduction of the old banking system. If you are trusted (in Ripple, you are a Gateway), you issue IOU's: if you issue IOU's which are not backed by real assets... Well, that's how it is in debt-based systems. You just incur in more debt to cover the holes, and if you don't, you default.

Example:

1) You deposit BTC to Bitstamp (the only "official" Gateway ATM)
2) You grant trust to Bitstamp inside Ripple
3) You "send" your BTC from Bitstamp to your Ripple account: your BTC never leave Bitstamp, they just send a "piece of paper" (IOU) saying that they owe you 10BTC
4) You can trade those IOUs inside Ripple, you can pay for goods, etc.

I hope you grasp the very negative incentives that Bitstamp could have - again, they are virtually able to create money from thin air. They could "lend" you money they don't have against a commission (as the fucking banks we want to get rid of do). This is what TradeFortress is doing - people gave him "trusted" status, so he can virtually create money (455 BTC up to date) - because inside Ripple you just trade IOU's - the only thing is not a IOU are Ripples.

Fucked up system if you ask me. We already have a bank system. And we want to get rid of it.



379. Post 2216453 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Switching to mBTC would attract more buyers for sure. Let's do not forget that Bitcoin is generally perceived by the gran public as a currency more than a pure store of value, and thus paying +$100 for a single coin/token feels extremely expensive. That's true in the US and Europe, even more so in other parts of the world.

Anyhow, I think that the market will adjust itself regarding which units of BTC are used on exchanges and goods pricing.



380. Post 2220629 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: notme on May 21, 2013, 08:47:20 AM
Let that spring coil just a little longer. Note how amazing a buying opportunity we have now with this shower of continuous good/great news and minimal price reaction. This time you don't even need to try to catch a falling knife. Easy, low-risk gains for the non-clueless.

I think it's just going to take one big buy to push people off the edge... I smell a panic buy coming on...

$70k would take us to $123 and wake up the bulls a bit, but we really need to see $125 fall if we want things to get exciting.

$90k to $123 ATM



381. Post 2220746 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Volume is getting lower and lower at Gox.

We may soon have to troll on the "Wall Observer - Bitstamp wall movement tracker - Hardcore" thread?

After the painfully verification/trust process at Gox, it would be major PITA to go through the same process with another exchange - but anyhow we really need to get rid of MtGox's dangerous centralization.

I just hope that better infrastructure arrives ASAP, I'm still not loving Bitstamp too much, and liquidity is still too low (but it is improving).




382. Post 2221476 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 21, 2013, 10:35:19 AM


Makes you wonder what it's gonna take to get the price moving up. If this, Webmoney, paypal founder's investment, and gyft among other good news didn't do much, what do we need?

Really, it seems at this point we are waiting for an Amazon/Paypal or the like to jump on. The China news and Russian Pay pal will probably affect the volume some.

A sure fire thing, which is inevitable imo, is another Cypress like event happening. When that happens we probably don't look back...

There was no Cypress event.

People in Cypress with over 100k in their banks are having their money stolen at a rate of around 80% - 90% (not clear yet). Further they took 400 million of their gold (an artificially reduced rate due to the naked short selling). In addition the people of Cypress are STILL not allowed to withdraw more than 300 Euros a day. Hey mom, can I have some more money? LOL

Cypress was merely the canary in the cage falling over. Now, are the miners listening or watching CNN and seeing that the economy is all well?

I agree with most of your posts in here, but not regarding the Cyprus situation - I'm sure that the Cyprus (not Cyprees, BTW) impact on the BTC price was just speculative mania. I can guarantee you that a negligible amount of Cyprus citizens were able to throw money to BTC. You know, BTC is a lengthy process: first you need to understand, and then you start to use a little money to buy BTC. It's not an easy process, as there are both intellectual and technical barriers.

The boost in price after Cyprus was just driven by a few individuals holding fiat in BTX exchanges, who considered this was "positive" news for BTC, and started buying more BTCs driving the price up.



383. Post 2221571 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: samson on May 21, 2013, 11:08:28 AM
The boost in price after Cyprus was just driven by a few individuals holding fiat in BTX exchanges, who considered this was "positive" news for BTC, and started buying more BTCs driving the price up.

It certainly wasn't driven by anyone in Cyprus as the bank accounts were all frozen. We can be 100% sure of that.

Yeah, that's for sure, not only because the bank accounts were frozen, but also because you just do not quickly throw significant money to BTC if you never bought BTC before - you just don't have the means to do it.



384. Post 2221574 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Gotta love stability




385. Post 2222306 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 21, 2013, 12:22:31 PM
Volume is getting lower and lower at Gox.

We may soon have to troll on the "Wall Observer - Bitstamp wall movement tracker - Hardcore" thread?

After the painfully verification/trust process at Gox, it would be major PITA to go through the same process with another exchange - but anyhow we really need to get rid of MtGox's dangerous centralization.

I just hope that better infrastructure arrives ASAP, I'm still not loving Bitstamp too much, and liquidity is still too low (but it is improving).



It looks to me like the price gap between Gox & Bitstamp is closing. Gox is happily soaking up all the "returning asks". Once we are close to parity, the spring will be ready to uncoil...

For bulls only (bears stop reading NOW)

((Stop reading you naughty bear..))


 Grin

I don't see any reason to suggest we're going down.  BitStamp coins are refusing to sell at the lower prices and are just holding.  It's a clear standoff.  It's going up when we breakthough.  

OMG...did I just say....it's going up?   Huh




386. Post 2222341 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Dargumin on May 21, 2013, 12:42:39 PM
Volume is getting lower and lower at Gox.

We may soon have to troll on the "Wall Observer - Bitstamp wall movement tracker - Hardcore" thread?

After the painfully verification/trust process at Gox, it would be major PITA to go through the same process with another exchange - but anyhow we really need to get rid of MtGox's dangerous centralization.

I just hope that better infrastructure arrives ASAP, I'm still not loving Bitstamp too much, and liquidity is still too low (but it is improving).



It looks to me like the price gap between Gox & Bitstamp is closing. Gox is happily soaking up all the "returning asks". Once we are close to parity, the spring will be ready to uncoil...

For bulls only (bears stop reading NOW)

((Stop reading you naughty bear..))


 Grin

I don't see any reason to suggest we're going down.  BitStamp coins are refusing to sell at the lower prices and are just holding.  It's a clear standoff.  It's going up when we breakthough. 

OMG...did I just say....it's going up?   Huh


Who's this guy and what have you done with coinseeker!

(p.s. based on the inaccuracy of your recent predictions I'm taking this as a a bearish signal!)

It is a bearish signal for sure: SELL SELL SELL!!



387. Post 2222353 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Crazy selling pressure at Bitstamp




388. Post 2222541 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 21, 2013, 01:02:17 PM
Crazy selling pressure at Bitstamp



Doesn't that mean that the asks (left side) would require light volume to go up and the sells would require heavier volume to move the price due to the steepness of the slope???

It's the opposite. The bids are on the left side, and you would need a heavy volume to take the price up, while you would need a very light volume to push the price down significantly.

Anyhow, it seems that asks are stable, nobody is dumping, everybody is patiently waiting for their asks to be filled.



389. Post 2222866 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: FNG on May 21, 2013, 01:35:49 PM
Crazy selling pressure at Bitstamp
It may look bad but $1.1mil takes out the entire red line. Not exactly "crazy"

Very crazy if you consider that a $950k dump (or BTC12.5k, which is nothing) would take us to almost single digits at Bitstamp. How about that?

If you did not get it, the graph means that ATM the total amount of fiat in Bitstamp's order book is not enough to bring the price over $125. On the contrary, the total amount of coins on Bitstamp's order book could bring the price to almost 0.

Obviously money and BTC can enter or vanish from the order book in the blink of an eye, but still one fact remains: the selling pressure is huge compared to the bid side at Bitstamp.





390. Post 2223041 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 21, 2013, 01:37:33 PM
Thanks for clarifying things Rampion. I've been following the market depth at GOX daily for a month or so now. It has been looking a lot better lately. Though the depth is really an easily manipulated thing and even when it's not I wonder how valuable it is, consistently speaking (as orders are always pulled).

I'm wondering how much business is actually leaving Gox. Any ideas how much the Dwolla thing is really affecting them? I know Dwolla itself was probably not a huge funding source for them (more for small cats), but I think it scared people off Gox anyway, and rightfully so.

Anyone have any ideas on Gox here? I also wonder how much money is moving to Bitstamp. Any ways of seeing this via an order book / market depth comparison between the two?

A lot of coins disappeared from Gox - it looks that almost BTC50k coins vanished from Gox order book just after the Dwolla situation, and obviously that figure does not count all the coins that were sitting on Gox without being on the order book. Anyhow, taking into account that the total amount of coins in the order book went from aprox. BTC170k to aprox. BTC120k, we can estimate that aprox. 30% of the total amount of coins sitting on Gox left that exchange after the Dwolla situation.

This huge amount of coins did not go to Bitstamp - only BTC18k are sitting at Bitstamp's order book, so we can safely assume that the gran majority of the individuals that withdrew their coins from Gox just sent them to a local wallet.

On the contrary, the bid sum increased just after the Dwolla situation (as expected - fearing people converting their fiat to BTC to withdraw it fast), but then it stabilized quite nicely to aprox. $21M, which is still more than x20 times the amount of fiat at Bitstamp order book, and is still a figure very close to ATH ($23M).

In my opinion we are living a "wait and see" situation. The fearful already withdrew their coins from MtGox immediately after the Dwolla thing, and the ones which still have some of their coins and their fiat there (I personally do) are not very worried.

Honestly, I do not see Bitstamp taking away a lot of business from MtGox soon - you have to take into account that verification to deal with significant money is a lengthy process, and Bitstamp does not even allow EUR trades. Then, Gox has a long history and is very trusted - they had customers who dealt with million $ and they never run away with their money, which is a big plus for big-money traders. I really doubt big time investors will run from Gox unless some real, trusted alternative is launched - perhaps an exchange run by some big Wall Street player.

I guess the best thing that could happen to Bitcoin is a very big financial player buying MtGox to run their operations in a 100% legal and professional way, while improving every aspect of their trading engine.




391. Post 2224592 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Quote from: fitty on May 21, 2013, 03:48:31 PM
This kind of volume is just the buying/selling from Bitcoin transactions.

BitPay accepts Bitcoins for businesses, turns around and sends them the USD/EUR/ETC... For the most part they sell those coins right away (or risk losing money). I'd think it would be too risky to hold coins, the market goes the wrong way they could lose their ass. They need constant fiat to be sending back out to the businesses accepting Bitcoins.

Regardless, there's lots of these places that need to buy/sell constantly during the day. At this kind of volume, it's just Bitcoin transactions. It's hard to read much more into it at this point.

We've had some pretty violent corrections, people who really wanted to get out, have gotten out. People who really wanted it, have gotten in. Lots of people waiting for a drop to get back in. Lots of new people waiting to see if this price holds before buying. I sense a lot of "wait and see" right now in the market. MtGox hasn't even discusses the DHS issue. It looks like we're primed for an uptrend, but it's probably not going to be the rallies we've been used to seeing.

Of course if a few whales decide to drop 5-10M buying up coins all bets go out the window. But right now no one is in a rush to sell, no one is in a rush to buy. Ahhh stability.


What you say is theoretically correct, but in practice I think you are overestimating a bit the volume of Bitcoin business transactions. Check Bitpays recent history: during their best month they managed $5.2M transactions in Bitcoin... And those where 99% buys from Avalon batch #3, which was sold through them. IMO this means that the rest of business transactions in Bitcoins is a peanut, I would be very surprised to discover that Bitpay accounts for more than 5% of the daily volume we had during the last days.

In fact, I bet that Silk Road merchants generate more volume in exchanges than Bitpay (if you take out the spikes in orders to BFL/Avalon).



392. Post 2225031 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_10.59h):

Coinseeker is long, bearish sign,  sell sell sell!

Cheesy



393. Post 2232332 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Loaded on May 20, 2013, 02:20:43 AM
Had a good time at the conference, definitely met some cool people. This week could be interesting.

Not much till today.



394. Post 2237597 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

It's just that there is no rush, neither to buy nor to sell. No panic ATM.

There's definitely someone selling little by little as soon as the price goes up a small %, but he is doing it in the right way, avoiding sleepage.

Anyhow, IMO more time passes with this stability, more sellers will get impatient. Fiat is slowly decreasing on Gox, while at Bitstamp there's still pocket money,  and I really do not see how that could change fast. I don't see buyers getting nervous.



395. Post 2238792 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: icekiss on May 22, 2013, 08:51:09 PM
Yeah, it was pure luck. And completely crazy that such a big sell stops precisely at my bid (it did not fill it completely, just mostly).


Love that when it happens

Anyhow I love even more when the bid is filled completely, even if that means that the very bottom was a little lower Smiley



396. Post 2239446 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

During uptrends some downwards manipulation is expected (bulls love to buy coins in bear traps)
During down trends, you can always spot big sellers looking to increase their profits creating bull traps

But when the market is stable... Its 99.99% just an impasse in the market, just a natural situation preceding the next trend. Occam razor. And take your tinfoil hats off from time to time  Grin




397. Post 2239780 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: MoreFun on May 22, 2013, 10:34:03 PM
During down trends, you can always spot big sellers looking to increase their profits creating bull traps
Can you explain this a little bit in details? Thank you.

If you are loaded with both coins and fiat and you want to sell a big chunk of coins you can place big bids and move them to push the price up and sell higher.



398. Post 2242785 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 23, 2013, 03:46:21 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYzXNhk3Vjw

Amir.
Amir...
Amir!
STOP!
Amir!
Amir!
Amir!
STOP!


 Cheesy

OMG, Amir removed his Mohawk... That must be a bearish signal...



399. Post 2243332 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: bito on May 23, 2013, 08:37:26 AM
Well, if you are bullish, a wall like that means you don't get much price slippage when you buy.

Many people have given this same slippage explaination over and over again since I joined this forum.

The reason I don't believe it is that I've always found it quite odd that someone would sometimes wait for the price to increase by as much as a dollar or two per Bitcoin until we hit a wall only to then buy it all to avoid slippage  Roll Eyes

My post was to suggest a possible reason for a big chunk of the 1000 BTC ask wall at 123 being eaten. If the wall was further away from the strike price then I think I'd agree with you. IIRC it was just under 123 with very thin asks in between.

IMHO a bullish buyer saw an opportunity to quickly pick up a lot of coins (660) at a fixed price. Wouldn't you prefer to get all your coins at a fixed price and let others lose on slippage as they push the price up?

Note that "quicky" means not having to sit for hours on Gox buying small amounts of coin at a time, or risk pushing the price up by setting a large bid, and finding all the speculators seeing this as a signal to push the price up.

BTW, I don't consider 660BTC that huge amount of coins. You can make a market order for that quantity and the slippage is minimum. If we speak about +1,500BTC... Well, that's another story.



400. Post 2244154 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: bito on May 23, 2013, 10:44:56 AM
Well, if you are bullish, a wall like that means you don't get much price slippage when you buy.

Many people have given this same slippage explaination over and over again since I joined this forum.

The reason I don't believe it is that I've always found it quite odd that someone would sometimes wait for the price to increase by as much as a dollar or two per Bitcoin until we hit a wall only to then buy it all to avoid slippage  Roll Eyes

My post was to suggest a possible reason for a big chunk of the 1000 BTC ask wall at 123 being eaten. If the wall was further away from the strike price then I think I'd agree with you. IIRC it was just under 123 with very thin asks in between.

IMHO a bullish buyer saw an opportunity to quickly pick up a lot of coins (660) at a fixed price. Wouldn't you prefer to get all your coins at a fixed price and let others lose on slippage as they push the price up?

Note that "quicky" means not having to sit for hours on Gox buying small amounts of coin at a time, or risk pushing the price up by setting a large bid, and finding all the speculators seeing this as a signal to push the price up.

BTW, I don't consider 660BTC that huge amount of coins. You can make a market order for that quantity and the slippage is minimum. If we speak about +1,500BTC... Well, that's another story.

I'm new to BTC and a bit naive about trading, so my understanding could be wrong. But I get the feeling that 660 BTC is a bigger amount with the relatively smaller volumes this week.

I am interested in any other theories why someone would buy 660 coins into that wall. My theory was that it's a day trader who saw an easy way to enter a position. Maybe it could be a newbie who doesn't know better?

In any case I wish I'd bought some too at $123!

Well, you just have witnessed a +BTC700 market buy less than 20 minutes ago, and the boost in price was just $0.5, which means a tiny 0.4% slippage.

Of course daytraders will want to avoid that 0.4% slippage, but 99% of Bitcoin investors simply don't care about a 0.4%.

Volume may be low, but market depth is strong.



401. Post 2245014 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Breaking $125 feels good Smiley




402. Post 2245018 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Both fiat and BTC are saying "bye bye" to Gox.




403. Post 2245084 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

We just broke the highest price of the last 7 days.

It will be interesting to see what happens at Bitstamp, with those HUGE ask walls.




404. Post 2245103 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: blackreplica on May 23, 2013, 01:01:35 PM
Both fiat and BTC are saying "bye bye" to Gox.

I'm not sure I infer that from the charts. Ask orders going down yes, bids holding steady yes, and price steadily increasing (with highest price amongst all exchanges) implies to me that a rational trader would be keeping BTC on Gox at the very least. With bid sums staying where they are I don't think its conclusive to say fiat is leaving either

Well, I can guarantee you that I'm leaving both my coins and fiat at Gox atm, even if i have to admit that I reduced my trading position by 80% after the Dwolla situation. I was going to do that in any case, as I stated a lot of times I do not like to sell coins, only to buy them after/during dips and crashes.



405. Post 2245110 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Rockford on May 23, 2013, 01:02:29 PM

-Bitstamp Orderbook is looking better every hour


Unfortunately I do not see that. Bid sum at Bitstamp was $955k a few days ago. Now its $1.05M. That's a tiny improvement. And it is still a joke compared with the $20M sitting on Gox's order book.



406. Post 2245219 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: icekiss on May 23, 2013, 01:18:34 PM
bitstamp: everything short of the 120.0BTC wall just got bought up (wall is 350BTC).

Yes, there are still huge ask walls on bitstamp, but they got reduced by something like 2000BTC in the last 24hours. So there is definitely a lot of fiat pouring in. It just isn't sitting in the order book (which would be extremely stupid anyway, looking as how it can be used to buy cheap coins instead  Roll Eyes ).

And "tiny" is the wrong adjective at least for bitstamp: It is handling around 25% of all BTC trading volume by now.


I'm not speaking about relative volume, I'm speaking about the bid sum. On gox you still have x20 the amount of fiat compared to Bitstamp, which is expected - it's much slower to move fiat than coins.



407. Post 2245429 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

With such a low volume, we should go well above $130 to welcome a new uptrend. Let's see how strong is the bull's hope.



408. Post 2245551 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Yep, $126 wall being chewed ATM.




409. Post 2245558 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Wall at $126?

.....and it's gone Cheesy



410. Post 2245572 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

The last few days the price moved up when volume increased, went down when it decreased.

That's a good sign for the bulls. Buyers may get impatient.



411. Post 2245734 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

It looks like the ask wall at $127 is not going to be removed. Anyhow, it is a miniwall (aprox. BTC700). Let's see if the bulls are able to make it fall.




412. Post 2246306 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

As this is our own FUD-spreading thread, let me quote you the email that the Blockchain.info operator got from Twilio, regarding a possible action against Bitcoin in China:

Quote
Hi Ben,

We got further information from our carrier confirming that business such as bitcoin is not a proper financial tool in China and the Authority may treat bitcoin as an illegal business. Unfortunately the China Telecom Authority has requested that all bit-coin traffic to China be blocked.

As the provider of the phone number, Twilio is responsible for assuring the carriers that no more traffic related to bitcoin will be sent to China. Therefore, I have removed your international SMS permission to China. Please do not turn this on or try sending SMS messages to mobile numbers in China. Doing so will very likely lead to immediate account suspension.

Again I'm sorry for the convenience. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Thanks,
Twilio Customer Support

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40264.msg2243603#msg2243603



413. Post 2246420 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Kazu on May 23, 2013, 03:25:44 PM
Something weird here:

Look at that chart. Both the bid and ask amounts are declining. But then you notice that a "tick" down for bids is drawn in such a way that it is much more than a "tick" down for the asks. Yet, the price is going up. The only logical conclusion that can be drawn from this is that people are slowly realizing that being in the Gox orderbook (which is public knowledge and reported as market depth) is an inherent disadvantage, and thus while the bid and ask sums are declining the trades are still being executed through market orders or very-close-to-market-orders.

IMO that only means that both fiat and coins are saying "bye bye" to MtGox, slowly but steadily.



414. Post 2247139 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 23, 2013, 04:41:28 PM
1000BTC buy wall @ 120 just appeared on Bitstamp.  

Yeah, a tiny $120k wall looks like a super wall at Bitstamp Cheesy

Do you remember our good old Wallzilla, with his $2M wall, pumping the price up before his dump?

Just to give some context, $2M is exactly x2 the total amount of fiat sitting on Bitstamp's order book.

Imagine how that wall would look on Bitstamp Cheesy




415. Post 2247523 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Bitstamp's $100k bid wall is not fake at all. Being chewed ATM.

It's funny to see such a small wall looking so relatively big and menacing. Good news guys, at Bitstamp we can all be big time manipulators Smiley



416. Post 2248193 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: tHash on May 23, 2013, 06:15:48 PM
As this is our own FUD-spreading thread, let me quote you the email that the Blockchain.info operator got from Twilio, regarding a possible action against Bitcoin in China:

Quote
Hi Ben,

We got further information from our carrier confirming that business such as bitcoin is not a proper financial tool in China and the Authority may treat bitcoin as an illegal business. Unfortunately the China Telecom Authority has requested that all bit-coin traffic to China be blocked.

As the provider of the phone number, Twilio is responsible for assuring the carriers that no more traffic related to bitcoin will be sent to China. Therefore, I have removed your international SMS permission to China. Please do not turn this on or try sending SMS messages to mobile numbers in China. Doing so will very likely lead to immediate account suspension.

Again I'm sorry for the convenience. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Thanks,
Twilio Customer Support

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40264.msg2243603#msg2243603
That's pretty big news. I don't like the sound of it one bit. The media could dine out on that.
Oh, they have been going on and on for a while already, I'm not too worried: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7GFfJVo_KY

The consensus seems to be that the post on reddit was just to try and troll the price down.   It was made by a user with 1 post, and there is no further confirmation.   I would say wait to hear it from a reputable source before we worry too much anyway.   Not that we should worry, because if there is one thing that makes people want something all the more, it is to tell them that they aren't allowed . . .

The source is Been Reeves aka piuk, the guy running blockchain.info. Check the source link, the reddit guy copied and pasted the email Ben received from Twilio.



417. Post 2250378 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: TsuyokuNaritai on May 23, 2013, 10:46:07 PM
I'm just going to leave this here...

http://www.gizoogle.net/tranzizzle.php?search=https%3A%2F%2Fbitcointalk.org%2Findex.php%3Ftopic%3D174620.0%3Ball&se=Go+Git+Dis+Shiznit

Im LOLing so hard I shitted my pants



418. Post 2253664 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: fitty on May 24, 2013, 04:57:02 AM
Hello ladies,

You are now reading this with my voice.

 Grin

Sorry to burst your bubble, but there are no ladies on here. Bitcoin used to have a lady, but she got a Bitcoin tattoo and was never heard from again. Just us guys now.

I think she got 200 BTC for it.

Picture #1 - NSFW-ish
Picture #2 - NSFW-ish
Picture #3 - NSFW-ish
Picture #4 - NSFW-ish

Ahhh, here's the thread.

2011 - Bitcoin was such a wild and crazy world.

Why do u say she was never herd again? Se has been active lately in the betting sub forums.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=33342;sa=showPosts



419. Post 2254072 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Slowly breaking the higher highs of the last 7 days. Slow and steady climbing - this is what we called "sustainable growth" and we were hoping for during the parabolic growth - right? Cheesy




420. Post 2254202 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

We may see an interesting Friday when the US wake up

It's interesting to see how lately we had more action on Fridays, and even on Weekends, compared to Wednesdays - which were the days with biggest action (both downwards and upwards) until now.



421. Post 2254205 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 16, 2013, 10:32:22 PM
Posting guild lines:
 Please lets keep this thread clean. ( I will be removing any off topic posts )
 Do not post random comments on this thread, unless it is directly related to the last wall update (ex. The 20K ask was was NOT sold into, it was removed after being tested)
 When you post a chart please use bitcoincharts.com, mtgoxlive.com, btccharts.com or bitcoinity.com


as requested, i have started a new thread.
this thread is now a self-moderated topic.
I will try and keep this thread clean, with only facts, current trends, past price movements, depth charts, etc.
I promise to not delete post simply because i do not agree with the bearish TA.

Quoting the OP rules for the lulz

Cheesy:D:D



422. Post 2254518 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Yeah, it must feel bad to be a bear right now... Pockets full of fiat, feeling sad and lonely because everybody left him behind*... Cheesy

*kudos to fitty Wink



423. Post 2254654 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

New 7 days high just broken.

Little by little, lonely bears are left behind Wink




424. Post 2254701 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

7 days high broken again.

Next milestone, breaking the 30d high ($166.43). That should take a while, but with BTC you never know. Breaking $130 with nice volume could trigger some nice panic buys Cheesy




425. Post 2254771 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: icekiss on May 24, 2013, 10:23:16 AM
bitstamp:
Wall got bought up (well, 356BTC out of 400BTC anyway, so its not a wall anymore).
Would not have thought that would happen so fast, with all the buying pressure...


400BTC is such a small amount that I wouldn't even call that a wall. Maybe a mini-wall.

But I get that Bitstamp and Gox standards are different.



426. Post 2254789 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: icekiss on May 24, 2013, 10:26:34 AM
bitstamp:
Wall got bought up (well, 356BTC out of 400BTC anyway, so its not a wall anymore).
Would not have thought that would happen so fast, with all the buying pressure...


400BTC is such a small amount that I wouldn't even call that a wall. Maybe a mini-wall.

But I get that Bitstamp and Gox standards are different.

believe me, 400BTC counts as a (small) wall on bitstamp...  Roll Eyes

Well, be happy for the buyer. He managed to buy 400BTC without having to move his wall upwards by a single cent. I love that when I'm buying.



427. Post 2255434 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: smoothie on May 24, 2013, 11:58:50 AM
Have you bought your bitcoin yet as the choo choo leaves the station?

Get it now... Tongue



(man, we used to post this pic when we had a 30% increase in one day, but....)



428. Post 2255442 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

99€ is a nice figure.




429. Post 2256694 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Sorry for posting an EUR pic, but 100€ is quite a milestone Wink




430. Post 2256747 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Rally on volume?

Tide is changing, bears are puzzled... Wasn't this like 2011?

 Grin



431. Post 2256831 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: dexX7 on May 24, 2013, 03:06:06 PM
Rally on volume?

Tide is changing, bears are puzzled... Wasn't this like 2011?

 Grin

It's quite remarkable how things have changed. Remember a few days before? Smiley

If you did not get it, the graph means that ATM the total amount of fiat in Bitstamp's order book is not enough to bring the price over $125.

Fiat and coins decreasing quickly at Gox, really hope Bitstamp can absorb Gox's volume smoothly.

Kind of stress test, if it's successful it is a great step forward for BTC. Hope they did well with their money transmitter shit, etc.

Good times to launch am exchange, Kraken is to be followed.



432. Post 2256863 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: kickinyou on May 24, 2013, 02:35:54 PM
Cash out or not ?

Sure, if you think it's gonna crash to 120 then i would cash out.

I think that it will , but people here are not thinking so :/  but you cant trust anyone here ? I dont know ho to trust and who not to trust Sad

Just trust your won analysis.

In these forums you will see a lot of fun trolling and FUD-spreading, some hilarious gif, and a little useful insights that should just complement your very own analysis.



433. Post 2257000 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: NodePool on May 24, 2013, 03:22:22 PM
Cash out or not ?

Sure, if you think it's gonna crash to 120 then i would cash out.

I think that it will , but people here are not thinking so :/  but you cant trust anyone here ? I dont know ho to trust and who not to trust Sad

Just trust your won analysis.

In these forums you will see a lot of fun trolling and FUD-spreading, some hilarious gif, and a little useful insights that should just complement your very own analysis.

I am trusting my sealf but i also want to know wichusefull insights i can trust to make my own decision

If you don't understand that most posters where want you to act on what they post so that THEY will profit, not YOU, then I'm very worried. Your decision needs to be YOUR OWN.

It's simply delusional to believe that you can manipulate the market posting in here. We have a couple of those nutheads both in the bear and bull team: Jaroslaw, rpietila, Fourkeys (the latter lost everything shorting I guess), but most of people is not delusional and posts just to share a good time discussing a common interest.

That said, kickinyou: trust the insights which have logic behind them, but do not forget that the matter is not WHO, the important point is WHAT, and to decide what makes sense or not you need to have your very own analysis first.



434. Post 2257235 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on May 24, 2013, 03:45:52 PM
Just buy and never sell. When it drops, buy more Smiley

This.

This +2

 Grin



435. Post 2258358 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: KillaMarci on May 24, 2013, 06:00:37 PM
I'm thinking of switching from Bitstamp to Mt.Gox. It's kinda annoying that Bitstamp just doesn't seem to want to go up together with Mt.Gox. I feel there are a lot more trading opportunities on Gox. :/

That comes with liquidity



436. Post 2258416 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 24, 2013, 06:08:50 PM
Looks like my dreams of early retirement may materialize this year!

when you hold AM, all dreams are filled Smiley

Especially if you bought at IPO price. What an amazing return. And I just declined to buy when I was offered at 0.3BTC per share...



437. Post 2258833 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 24, 2013, 06:47:07 PM
the bid / ask sum must look ridiculous right now.

can someone post a pic idk where to get that one.

Your desires are orders




438. Post 2265579 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Weekend dip is a classic situation.

Anyhow, move on low volume.



439. Post 2268631 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Pzi4nk on May 25, 2013, 06:29:13 PM
Mt Gox down  Angry

It's working on my end.



440. Post 2269391 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on May 25, 2013, 08:04:37 PM
I said "in some other variation". Similar things could occur with the Bitcoin client network (see blocksize limit) for instance.

Also, while MtGox is throwing over a little crums for the other exchanges, I don't see it losing its status as #1 exchange anytime soon. In 2011, Tradehill popped up and took some of MtGox's market share. Tradehill vanished. A couple other exchanges that were highest in volume following MtGox got hacked or closed due to legal trouble.

It's too bad, but there is no singularity in Bitcoin infrastructure and it will be a limiting factor for quite some time.

Anyway, we should settle it and maybe one of us will remember the 300k USD prediction in December 2013 and laugh at the other. Grin

We will laugh for sure about the 300k usd prediction in December 2013, whatever the price will be

And we should ask rpietila to share with you a little bit of the shit he is smoking while he is not hospitalized, it may help you to control the butthurt 2011 bear syndrome inside you Wink



441. Post 2277890 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 26, 2013, 07:09:09 PM
Yeah but, 131 is ~1800 coins away.  Fundamentally, nothing has really changed.

Yup, true. But slowly up we go... after leaving 131 behind, it should move veery fast. Wink

Oh yeah, there is nothing stopping it after that.  I've just learned to be a little more patient with BitStamp.  You see how long it took to break through 130, right?   Shocked

Additionally, it would seem to me there is alot of continued upward push.  As bearish as I like to be, I still see nothing but "open road" ahead.  Obviously one whale could send this whole thing crashing but as it stands, this looks to have some continued power behind it.  

We are in an interesting phase of price discovery. Clearly a lot of coins are disappearing due to being put in a "savings account" and at the same time we are seeing more coins being used for donations, daily purchases, etc. I wonder how much the price will go up just based on more adoption via actual daily usage??? Really, that is an interesting question as Bitpay and the like are going to be doing the instant conversions so will be creating liquidity at the exchanges.

 As the price moves up (and at times violently) we are going to see people call tops and sell. Eventually, I imagine there will be a reasonable distribution, but the early adopters will always hold a portion as they believe in the greater purpose. They will further most likely re-"invest" in Bitcoin in a variety of ways - e.g., legal fund, VC, etc.

Just considering the current float of 11 million or so and the fact that the actual float is probably less than half that, I really would not be shocked at any price this year between what we are at currently and even $1000. I don't care so much about the price, but it is still a very interesting thing to consider as we are still trying to understand what this is...

Kinda hard to be wrong with a prediction range of 130-1000.   Shocked   Grin Grin

Seriously though, without any really bad news, (major USG type news) I can't really find much fault in this analysis.  Speculation of course, but fair.  For me it's the same, really too soon to narrow down the "silver bullet" to the rise as so many new things are taking place.  It may very well be just a perfect storm building of incoming capital, aftermath of the convention, confidence after Dwolla and Liberty, may well have a positive affect soon.  Not sure how well Gyft sales are doing but there is just a ton of little positives that seem to be adding together nicely.

For you bulls, I have to admit, there is much to cheer about or at least be optimistic about in the short term.  Mid-long term is anyones guess but for now, enjoy the fact that I can find no legitamate FUD to spread around.   Grin

What happened with "the US will go after Bitcoin and will kill it, Ripple will take over" and other FUD you spread non stop after the Dwolla situation? What made you to change your  mind?

Maybe you sold your useless XRPs and bought some BTC? Or you educated yourself a bit and understood that Bitcoin was designed to be immune to bans/regulation?



442. Post 2282409 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 27, 2013, 01:41:18 AM

Lol @ Coinseeker's attempt at damage control. "Lol, people don't argue with me because I constantly say dumb shit; they do it because, like, they totally have contrary beliefs and stuff."

Do you realize how silly it is to claim that what you say is "calling it like you see it?" Do you see any people saying "What I predict is just made up" or "I don't really believe what I I predict" or "I don't call it like I see it." It's redundant to say that you believe that what you say is accurate. It's like a restaurant telling me that they think their food tastes good because they know good food and they call it like they see it. Ain't no point to a statement like that.

Coinseeker the Restaurateur to his patrons that don't like his food: "Look, if I see good food, I'm going to call it like I see it, and I will speak on it. Even though my reasons are justified, I'll still get accused of making disgusting food, because my opinion of the food I gave you is just contradictory to what you food-h8ers believe."


Except the main difference is, I am accurate.   Wink   You guys just get sensitive because I mock your "revolution".  I'm a capitalist, I'm here to make money. The rest you can keep.  If you don't like my analysis and speculation, the ignore button works just fine.      

We mock you because:

A) you are not consistent in your analysis: for example, the day after Dwolla you predicted Bitcoin was going to be destroyed by the US, that price was going to plummet, etc... And now you say it's going up up up. Ad BTW: if you got scared by the Dwolla thing, you are a retarded. One month ago there were the same chances of Gox being shut down than today. If the US decides to go after Gox/ Bitcoin there will be no prior warning, their action will be sudden.

B) you are clearly uneducated about Bitcoin, you do not understand why it was created and how it works, and you expose these two facts every time you express an opinion... But at the same time you seem to think you are smarter than average, which under the light of the facts is pathetic and ridiculous.

C) your trolling is annoying and not fun at all, while your "serious" alter ego has nothing interesting to say.

And last but not least, please spare use the pathetic and off topic US nationalism that we have to read in some of your posts.



443. Post 2282579 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on May 27, 2013, 08:00:47 AM
Oh it seems you are their new scapegoat coinseeker. I'm glad I got rid of that role actually,

No scapegoating here. It's just that most of us in here agree that 99% of Coinseeker's posts are not worth our time, just because they are very low quality.



444. Post 2282944 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on May 27, 2013, 08:43:34 AM
Oh it seems you are their new scapegoat coinseeker. I'm glad I got rid of that role actually,

No scapegoating here. It's just that most of us in here agree that 99% of Coinseeker's posts are not worth our time, just because they are very low quality.

Sometimes I have to listen to the ones I disagree with. It is my judgment to decide whether I can learn something or not from them. If not (eg Jaroslaw) then there's the ignore button. And in fairness last week Coinseeker promoted himself out of my ignore list.

The point some others have already highlighted is that the guy alternates a semi-serious alter-ego, which makes bearable his ignorance about the basic aspects of Bitcoin, with a worthless troll that is wasting everybody's time.



445. Post 2283587 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Money is leaving Gox ($4.5M vanished from the order book in the last 10 days) and it's not arriving to Bitstamp for the moment (just aprox. $800k on Bitstamp's order book, which is a ridiculous figure).




446. Post 2283848 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Piper67 on May 27, 2013, 11:16:07 AM
Money is leaving Gox ($4.5M vanished from the order book in the last 10 days) and it's not arriving to Bitstamp for the moment (just aprox. $800k on Bitstamp's order book, which is a ridiculous figure).



Money leaving the orderbook does not equal Money leaving Gox

It's not equal but it's definitely related. Having fiat sitting idle on an exchange is pointless.

About CMF: buying pressure is non-existant at Gox ATM, this is a fact. I'm definitely expecting a considerable dip, rather sooner than later, before approaching $166.43




447. Post 2284339 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 27, 2013, 12:08:24 PM
[...]

And we had 3 weeks of sideways action. Now suddenly we've had 24 hours bouncing between $133-$135 and we're about to have a big dip? No buying pressure for the last half of May didn't really seem to hurt things that much.

To put things into perspective, I personally don't expect the rally that started 4 days ago to be over yet, but I'm wondering if the recent drop in buying pressure (see my CMF post above) could correspond to a short-term dip, perhaps testing 125 again. If nothing else, that would give us the chance to increase our btc stashes Cheesy

I pretty much agree with your analysis.



448. Post 2284522 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Coinseeker, we all knew that suckers would have panicked after the Dwolla situation, and this is why everybody following this thread sold just before or at the beginning of the dip to buy back cheaper shortly after. But you were actually saying that the panic was justified, that the situation was indeed very bad news for BTC mid-term and that this was just a first step in a coordinated attack that would have killed Bitcoin - all these statements were based on superficial and flawed analysis that was destroyed by regulars with a better understanding of Bitcoin.

And BTW, here you are now "predicting" that BTC will go up up up.



449. Post 2284603 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: oda.krell on May 27, 2013, 12:59:17 PM
Coinseeker, we all knew that suckers would have panicked after the Dwolla situation, and this is why everybody following this thread sold just before or at the beginning of the dip to buy back cheaper shortly after. But you were actually saying that the panic was justified, that the situation was indeed very bad news for BTC mid-term and that this was just a first step in a coordinated attack that would have killed Bitcoin - all these statements were based on superficial and flawed analysis that was destroyed by regulars with a better understanding of Bitcoin.

And BTW, here you are now "predicting" that BTC will go up up up.


don't feed the... you know the drill

You are right. Jaroslaw is the only one in my ignore list for the moment, but I really think Coinseeker will follow him.



450. Post 2284727 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Last time I'm feeding the troll. Coinseeker: below an example of your "super accurate" predictions. You are delusional if you really think you have been accurate.

You've been overly emotional and inconsistent in ALL your posts, spreading worthless FUD in 90% of them, let's leave apart your complete misunderstanding of BTC fundamentals.

Did you want us to dig some quotes? Ok, a quick one below:

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 14, 2013, 11:17:24 PM
If there's a real show of force against Gox in the US when business opens tomorrow, we'll definitely be seeing sub $100 for sure imo.

You'll see sub 100 in the next couple hours or so.  Maybe less.  Especially as people who don't sit and watch this forum or the markets get home and realize they are losing big $$$ and are caught in a firestorm.  I feel bad for those who aren't aware yet and have limit orders setup.   Cry  

Price never went sub $100. The very low caused by the sucker's panic sell after Dwolla was around $105, so $100 was not even tested. Price immediately rebounded back to $115, so those with no stop-loss orders were OK - in fact they would have been screwed if they sold at $110 (when you made your prediction) waiting for the sub $100 coins you said we would have seen soon. After that dip, we had a rally to $120 on the day after, and then to $125 two days after. We never looked back since then.

Yeah man, it's so clear that you really understood the implications and effects of the Dwolla thing, both short and mid term, I think I'm going to send you my money so you can trade for me and set those nice limit orders that will save my investment.

LOL



451. Post 2284854 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: samson on May 27, 2013, 01:29:06 PM
Did we just see a 2.5k sell without the price moving?

Yep, someone with 2,5k btc needs more bitcoins it seems, never is enought. He would rebuy in a few hours at a loss if no more bears follow his play (i hope  Grin)

Yes we obtained 10% for two days. On Bitstamp is still over 2K coins for about $ 130. Today probably will not break the record high.
 
But if you do not come any bad news, I doubt that we will rebuy for less than $ 128 (maybe 126).

It's going to take some serious sell offs to bring the price into the mid $120's again.

I can't see it happening.

Testing again $125 is expected (if I weren't all in ATM I would place a bid at $125.79 or similar), but I don't think we will break $125. If we don't break it, is bullish sign. If we break-it, is definitely short term bearish.



452. Post 2284902 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Dalib on May 27, 2013, 01:37:52 PM
Did we just see a 2.5k sell without the price moving?

Yep, someone with 2,5k btc needs more bitcoins it seems, never is enought. He would rebuy in a few hours at a loss if no more bears follow his play (i hope  Grin)

Yes we obtained 10% for two days. On Bitstamp is still over 2K coins for about $ 130. Today probably will not break the record high.
 
But if you do not come any bad news, I doubt that we will rebuy for less than $ 128 (maybe 126).

It's going to take some serious sell offs to bring the price into the mid $120's again.

I can't see it happening.

Testing again $125 is expected (if I weren't all in ATM I would place a bid at $125.79 or similar), but I don't think we will break $125. If we don't break it, is bullish sign. If we break-it, is definitely short term bearish.

still quite hungry bulls lurking at $130 and 128 Wink

I just hope we see a spike in volume in the next hours. It's really getting lower and lower on Gox.



453. Post 2285121 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: glendall on May 27, 2013, 02:07:32 PM
HRmmm is it just me or is the price dropping somewhat ?

[going to make a pot coffee..just rolled outta bed...]

A dip is/was expected, let's see how "deep" is the dip.



454. Post 2286701 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 27, 2013, 04:41:09 PM
Starting to look bad from here...  Lips sealed

Since when cheap coins look bad?

Wink



455. Post 2287008 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on May 27, 2013, 05:05:42 PM
Starting to look bad from here...  Lips sealed

Since when cheap coins look bad?

Wink

Always. It hurts the coin.

No only when you are "all in" (which means you are broke and invested more than you can afford to lose)

This. 

Just a remark: you can be "all in" in the sense that you bought coins with all the funds you have at your disposal for BTC trading/investing, which is obviously needs to be an amount you can afford to lose.



456. Post 2287049 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on May 27, 2013, 05:02:29 PM
Starting to look bad from here...  Lips sealed

Since when cheap coins look bad?

Wink

Always. It hurts the coin.

This is not true. Bitcoin already went from $32 to $2. Did it "hurt the coin"? No. Bitcoin is resilient, but very much prone to volatility because of its scarcity. Don't fool yourself thinking that it can only go up. It will go up, then down, then it will bubble, then it will lose 85% of its value.

Been there, seen that. Nothing to worry about. Just be cold-minded enough to do not shit yourself when it loses 85% of its value, just BUY more.

 



457. Post 2287137 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: michaelGedi on May 27, 2013, 05:11:56 PM
Starting to look bad from here...  Lips sealed

Since when cheap coins look bad?

Wink

Always. It hurts the coin.

No only when you are "all in" (which means you are broke and invested more than you can afford to lose)


I've been wondering recently what is "more than you can afford to lose"?

should there be a distinction between "more than you can afford to lose" and "an amount that you can afford to lose, but it's quite a large percentage of what you own"...?



Well, the % you can afford to lose is different for every person, depending on his circumstances.

Some guy in his 20s could totally afford to lose all his fiat denominated savings on BTC - the cost of losing the opportunity could be higher than the damage done if his few $'s vanish.

A guy completely debt-free and with a nice and secure monthly income could also risk a relatively high % of his savings to BTC.

Au contraire, someone with a family to feed and a monthly income that is just enough to cover the expenses, should risk very little of his savings on BTC.

It's just a matter of personal situation. I know that in other times of my life I would have risked all my fiat savings, which is something I wouldn't do now.



458. Post 2287185 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 27, 2013, 05:23:06 PM
definitely put more then you can afford to lose in BTC... trust me don't make the same mistake i made

Sorry adam, but that's bad advice. Bitcoin is a high-risk investment, and that's why it has such a potentially huge return. If you put more than you can afford to lose (meaning that your life would change significantly if you lose it, that you may not be able to pay debts, send your kid to school, etc.) you are just a nuthead or a pathologic gambler. Because at the end of the day, BTC is more a gamble than an investment.




459. Post 2287227 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: samson on May 27, 2013, 05:16:41 PM
Starting to look bad from here...  Lips sealed

Since when cheap coins look bad?

Wink

Always. It hurts the coin.

This is not true. Bitcoin already went from $32 to $2. Did it "hurt the coin"? No. Bitcoin is resilient, but very much prone to volatility because of its scarcity. Don't fool yourself thinking that it can only go up. It will go up, then down, then it will bubble, then it will lose 85% of its value.

Been there, seen that. Nothing to worry about. Just be cold-minded enough to do not shit yourself when it loses 85% of its value, just BUY more.

 

Quite right but don't hold it like an idiot all the way down - sell it and buy it back much cheaper.


That's the ideal, but it's not so easy to spot the tops and the bottoms. I very much prefer to hold than to make a mistake and end up with less BTC's.

I admit a daytrade a bit, but only with play money, for the fun of it. Most of my trading consists in spotting the bottom to buy more, that's it.



460. Post 2287342 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 27, 2013, 05:31:19 PM
definitely put more then you can afford to lose in BTC... trust me don't make the same mistake i made

Sorry adam, but that's bad advice. Bitcoin is a high-risk investment, and that's why it has such a potentially huge return. If you put more than you can afford to lose (meaning that your life would change significantly if you lose it, that you may not be able to pay debts, send your kid to school, etc.) you are just a nuthead or a pathologic gambler. Because at the end of the day, BTC is more a gamble than an investment.

ok fine, definitely put the MAXIMUM amount of money you can afford to lose.



There we have an agreement, my friend Smiley

I will say more: STOP buying silly things with your "spare" money, just throw it to Bitcoin!



461. Post 2288010 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 27, 2013, 06:43:54 PM
I see a lot less wall manipulation these days. we haven't seen a huge bid or ask wall pop up purely to cause panic. good sign IMO



lol i say that, and now their is a 5K ask wall


panic time?

Someone read you. We are not alone here gentlemen.

Anyhow it's true that there has been waaaaay less wall manipulation lately. All big walls are legit.

And BTW: ......here come the CHEAP coins!



462. Post 2288021 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Come on guys SELL SELL SELL all your coins!!!!




463. Post 2288032 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Jeeeez, the one who just dumped was someone who shitted his pants when he saw the ask wall at $132.30

And BTW, that ask wall didn't move. Maybe its owner is getting nervous? Time for a little dump and some panic sell?

Yeah, definitely Wink



464. Post 2288185 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on May 27, 2013, 06:59:42 PM
Enough to break the trendline?  Grin

That's the wrong one. The one matters goes from 50 through 79 which should still be intact. (I haven't checked though)

That one is about to be broken just now.

cheap coins, dah dah dah....

ANYHOW: if we don't break below $125, everything is still bullish.



465. Post 2289971 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: nimda on May 27, 2013, 10:07:38 PM

ChartBuddy was useful for a whole post!

In other news, fiat should be hitting the books tomorrow.

Bulls need to fortify and barricade $125, bears may very well double test it, and if they cannot make it fall they will just run away beaten up and scared.

To the contrary, breaking $125 would be a significant trend reversal



466. Post 2293114 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Fiat is pouring out from Gox's order book. Bears are better equipped for the next assault to $125.

It's crucial for the bulls to win that battle. If they win it for the second time the battlefield will be full of bear corpses, and they won't dare to try to take that spot again.

If they make it fall... Well, we will see much cheaper coins (below $120), and a mid term downtrend would be expected.




467. Post 2293489 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Miz4r on May 28, 2013, 08:59:28 AM
Fiat is pouring out from Gox's order book. Bears are better equipped for the next assault to $125.

It's crucial for the bulls to win that battle. If they win it for the second time the battlefield will be full of bear corpses, and they won't dare to try to take that spot again.

If they make it fall... Well, we will see much cheaper coins (below $120), and a mid term downtrend would be expected.

I disagree, $125 is not important, $120 has much stronger support and is the real line bulls have to defend. And even if it breaks I don't expect a mid term downtrend to form, just a retreat to former stable values in the 105-120 range.

Many traders will just sell and prepare for bears ruling if $125 is broken because that would mean that the trendline that was drew from the $79 and $103 lows is gone (30 days chart).

I agree that breaking $120 would be VERY BAD for bulls, while a breaking $125 could be reversed with enough faith... Anyhow, if $125 is broken is more likely that $120 will be broken too, triggering a bear market before testing the real tipping point, which is $166.43.



468. Post 2295789 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Bears going to hit $125

If they make it fall we will have the chance to buy sub-$120 coins Wink

If they don't, there's only one way: up up up




469. Post 2295816 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on May 28, 2013, 02:19:20 PM
These sells just suck. Pointless.

Well, sometimes people need fiat to pay for their new cars, etc.



470. Post 2295870 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

For the ones who missed Hitler screwed by BTC's weekend dip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4axmD2YvPnA



471. Post 2295938 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on May 28, 2013, 02:26:42 PM
These sells just suck. Pointless.

Well, sometimes people need fiat to pay for their new cars, etc.

I doubt that's the case here.
The price clearly was going up again. It doesn't make sense.  

It's not clear at all. If we double bottom at $125, then the price will clearly go up again. If we break below $125, it is not.

If I'd urgently need fiat from my BTC (which I don't), I would have sold yesterday at $133ish, as a dip was very much expected. If I'd urgently need fiat and I was not trading yesterday, I would have sold earlier today, as a retest of $125 is expected too.

The risk of breaking $125 is there. And BTW, with "urgently" I mean that you need your fiat in the next week or so.




472. Post 2296032 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: IG0BR0KE on May 28, 2013, 02:39:23 PM
the bad sign is when someone is trying to push us up with 100+btc it is entirely bought rly fast.

The good thing is when your fiat is about to arrive to Gox, and you know that there are cheap coins ahead Smiley



473. Post 2296485 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on May 28, 2013, 03:34:00 PM
Nice to see I called it right to sell at 127 (bitstamp)  Cheesy
Now if I just knew how low it goes...  Roll Eyes

Btw.: I decided based on technical analyses as well. It was telling me we were and are in a downward trend.
What it (obviously) can't tell me is when the trend will break.  Tongue

What is up with the bitstamp feed at bitcoinity though? It's dead for me, while the one for mt.gox is working fine  Undecided

Edit: Wow, that was quite a buy! about 2kBTC upwards in one go, right through 128!


Wait, your TA didn't predict that??

TA should have told him that the best point to sell was yesterday at $133, to then rebuy at $125ish, as per here (price was $133 at that point):

Quote from: Rampion on May 27, 2013, 01:35:29 PM
Testing again $125 is expected (if I weren't all in ATM I would place a bid at $125.79 or similar), but I don't think we will break $125. If we don't break it, is bullish sign. If we break-it, is definitely short term bearish.

What the TA cannot tell you is: will we test again $125? I think yes, but impossible to know reading TA. We will break it? I think not, but it's 50/50 chance. Anyhow, as I love coins more than fiat, I wouldn't sell again the coins bought back at $125ish.



474. Post 2296899 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 28, 2013, 04:34:21 PM
http://www.coindesk.com/okpay-suspends-bitcoin-processing/

 Cry

LOL, check this shit, it's hilarious:

Quote
Mt. Gox wishes the best to OKPay, and we look forward to working together more closely
in the future. The Bitcoin economy is going through many changes recently, and we are
positive that they will ultimately work themselves out in the best interests of the
community and the World.

Source: https://mtgox.com/pdf/20130528_okpay_statement.pdf



475. Post 2297342 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Kazu on May 28, 2013, 05:18:07 PM
The issue is that the US government quickly dismantles any business that allows such a thing. Literally every single US based service ever that has enabled irreversible fast payments has been shut down. I'm not joking.

Good luck with "shutting down" Bitcoin.

I'm really hoping the US is so blind and short-sighted to officially outlaw Bitcoin, so a) Coinseeker and his likes stop using it because of that mental illness named "patriotism", and b) they learn in the very hard way that Bitcoin was designed to be resilient to both bans and regulation.

Anyhow, I guess all the financial institutions and their sockpuppets (AKA the three-letter agencies) have looked into it and realized they cannot just ban it, so they will play their cards differently.



476. Post 2297427 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: ardana123 on May 28, 2013, 05:30:49 PM
Since bitcoin is p2p, can't the US gov just make isp's block that specific protocol?

You simply do not block p2p. You have to take down the internet to do that.

EDIT: p2p means that I connect to you directly, without going through a central server. You cannot block that, unless you block the internet.



477. Post 2297532 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 28, 2013, 05:33:40 PM
The issue is that the US government quickly dismantles any business that allows such a thing. Literally every single US based service ever that has enabled irreversible fast payments has been shut down. I'm not joking.

Good luck with "shutting down" Bitcoin.

I'm really hoping the US is so blind and short-sighted to officially outlaw Bitcoin, so a) Coinseeker and his likes stop using it because of that mental illness named "patriotism", and b) they learn in the very hard way that Bitcoin was designed to be resilient to both bans and regulation.

Anyhow, I guess all the financial institutions and their sockpuppets (AKA the three-letter agencies) have looked into it and realized they cannot just ban it, so they will play their cards differently.

Well, so far Bitcoin or should I say the infastructure Bitcoin needs to be anything more than a speculative and black market sideshow, is losing that battle.  And DHS only served ONE warrant.  Talk all the big guy trash you want but people with actual businesses, fear the USG and FinCEN regulations are preventing any real launch of Bitcoin.

Look at the ATM's.  There could be thousands by now...but these people aren't going to jail for it.  Businesses are voluntarily closing or rejecting US users because they know the truth. All while you simply sit on your computer and pretend to be "hardcore", living in a delusional world that only sees Bitcoin increasing in value, even if no one in America can legally access it.  Grin   And please don't give me that, "the US isn't the whole world" nonsense either.  If there rest of the world was even remotely close to the volume of the US, the markets wouldn't be dead all night while you wait for us to wake up and of course...lead the world.   Wink

If you had read *something* about BTC, you would know that it was designed taking into account a very likely government ban on it. A ban on BTC wouldn't do shit to stop it, to the contrary it would just make it stronger in the long term.

And by te way... With "black market sideshow" you mean an economy worth $1,800,000,000,000 per year? Yeah, that's 1,800 BILLION. That's good enough.

As I told you in another thread: if BTC is banned GLOBALLY, it will still go to 4 digits, probably 5. Do the maths, assuming you know how to google and count.




478. Post 2297599 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Vicus on May 28, 2013, 05:45:19 PM
They can throttle/block bittorrent, why can't they do the same with bitcoin?
That is  not problem too. Bitcoin client then will learn to encrypt own traffic...

Or we will just connect through Tor. There's no technical way to effectively stop Bitcoin (or Bittorrent, BTW).

I would love so much to see the US banning BTC because of "terrorist links", and to read a last post by Coinseeker:

Quote
This is my last post. Bitcoin is unpatriotic, and therefore I'm handling my private keys to the DHS.



479. Post 2297726 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: ardana123 on May 28, 2013, 05:55:21 PM
Ya, and if bitcoin actually requires us to use TOR or a VPN, how would that benefit mass adoption? That would kill it entirely.

You do not need mass adoption. Sure, to see the $300k per BTC predicted by rptard you need mass adoption. But I personally don't need to see $300k per BTC.

I'm happy with a system that gives me and the ones like me monetary freedom. A decentralized, trust-free system which allows me to store and transfer value independently from financial institutions. A system that no Government can kill, where my funds cannot be seized.

Yes, it sounds like "paradise" for black market. The truth is that it is, and what Coinseeker does not seem to understand is how fucking big is black market's economy. But it's also a paradise for those who want an hedge on the current, rotten financial system - as telemaco just said.

If you are worried about not seeing mass adoption and thus "cheaper" coins, do not worry. As you can see with drugs, everything that is banned and difficult/dangerous to get comes with a premium. Yet, I do not think there will ever be 6 figures coins in a global ban scenario - but 4 figures coins? You can take them for GRANTED.



480. Post 2297750 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: MAbtc on May 28, 2013, 06:00:27 PM
You know it's people like you who make me wish the rest of the world would just drop all their nuclear bombs on the US and wipe it from the face of the earth.
Nice one....

Indeed. I have to admit that sometimes I have the same feelings, but then I realize that it's absurd to punish normal people because they had the bad luck to be born in a certain country where mentally ill people like Coinseeker live.



481. Post 2297781 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 28, 2013, 06:08:25 PM
They don't have to stop Bitcoin.  All they have to do is publicly link it to terrorism and block the flow of money.  It will then be unpatriotic for any US business to even ACCEPT Bitcoins, let alone become a legal money transmitter.  Delusions, delusions...everywhere delusions.  Without the US, Bitcoin is DEAD!

You know it's people like you who make me wish the rest of the world would just drop all their nuclear bombs on the US and wipe it from the face of the earth. Bitcoin doesn't need you or the US, I hope they officially ban it today in your country and label it as terrorism so I don't have to deal with pompous US nationalist people like you ever again. Smiley

please no hating on this thread,

 americans != american government

i think the US has made it pretty clear they will leave bitcoin itself alone, they will simply require strict records to be keep as to who is cashing in and out of bitcoin.

You are absolutely right. Let's go back to the wall observing.



482. Post 2297802 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 28, 2013, 06:07:39 PM
Ya, and if bitcoin actually requires us to use TOR or a VPN, how would that benefit mass adoption? That would kill it entirely.

You do not need mass adoption. Sure, to see the $300k per BTC predicted by rptard you need mass adoption. But I personally don't need to see $300k per BTC.

I'm happy with a system that gives me and the ones like me monetary freedom. A decentralized, trust-free system which allows me to store and transfer value independently from financial institutions. A system that no Government can kill, where my funds cannot be seized.

Yes, it sounds like "paradise" for black market. The truth is that it is, and what Coinseeker does not seem to understand is how fucking big is black market's economy. But it's also a paradise for those who want an hedge on the current, rotten financial system - as telemaco just said.

If you are worried about not seeing mass adoption and thus "cheaper" coins, do not worry. As you can see with drugs, everything that is banned and difficult/dangerous to get comes with a premium. Yet, I do not think there will ever be 6 figures coins in a global ban scenario - but 4 figures coins? You can take it for GRANTED.

What I know is the US dollar is by far the most popular black market currency.  Again, maybe in bizzaro world, it's bitcoin but here on Earth, the US dollar is king.  Bitcoin...ummm....what's a Bitcoin?   Roll Eyes

Your reasoning is so superficial that it makes me LOL (seriously). Bitcoin was born 3 years ago. It's still a baby. Give it some time, and then we'll speak.



483. Post 2297924 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Adam, could you pretty please open the "Wall Observer - RippleXRP wall movement tracker - only Coinseeker allowed" thread?



484. Post 2298213 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.00h):

Quote from: Richy_T on May 28, 2013, 06:35:26 PM

All Bitcoin has to do is drop it's "libertarian, destroy every government nonsense" and SUBMIT to regulations.  That's all.  And Bitcoin will be $300k per coin in no time.  What's it going to be?

Bitcoin can't. And that's its strength. There's already plenty of regulated currencies around. Good luck with those. Buy your wheelbarrow quick before it costs more money to buy one than it can hold. Or just put a bitcoin aside.



Don't discuss with the guy. He just does not understand/does not know anything. He doesn't seem to grasp that Bitcoin is in fact trust-free and decentralized, which is a big no-no for the US Government. The Gov needs to control the currency, because there is where true power resides, at least in a capitalist society. And there is no "regulation" in Bitcoin, because they cannot print more of it - and that is the only regulation they really care about.

As Rothschild said:

Quote
Give me control of a nations money supply, and I care not who makes it’s laws



485. Post 2298399 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 28, 2013, 07:05:29 PM
seeing all these methods of cashing in and out of bitcoin in the US is making me freak out a little....  Undecided

the market is surprisingly calm about all this FUD....

Adam, the only way to cash in and out significant money are bank wires. Do not freak out. Even if suddenly the US bans BTC... Who cares? Don't tell me this wasn't a very possible outcome from the very beginning.

And anyhow: I don't see these news as "US is going after Bitcoin". They just want to regulate and control it, at least for the moment. If they really were going after it, first thing was to ban bank wires to exchange - that's how the big money moves, Dwolla, OKpay and the likes are for small-timers.



486. Post 2299710 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Xrim on May 28, 2013, 08:13:47 PM
US Government making a move on Bitcoin is inevitable. The telegraphing thereof has already begun. Bitcoin has to survive the tribulation if it wants global adoption. If it doesn't survive, it'll fall into obscurity or be marginalized.



Sadly, I belive this too. Bitcoin have to survive this and become accepted by the common man and the governments . Otherwise all you can do with it is buy weed. Iwant to be able to buy a car with my coins someday.  

You need to understand that Bitcoin is a game changer. It's a challenge and possibly a threat for to the "status quo" of the most powerful people in the world: the ones controlling monetary supply.

Bitcoin being banned by Governments at some point is a possibility predicted from the very beginning. And that's why Satoshi is a pseudonym and he/they used Tor all the time,  working hard to totally conceal his/their real identity. And it's also one of the many reasons why you do not invest in it what you cannot afford to lose.

That said, we should assume clever people is advising government. And banning Bitcoin is bad advice, because it will very likely make it stronger on the long term - because it is designed with that in mind.

It may be most effective to them to regulate it as much as they can, trying to control it, even by owning as much hash rate as possible. And if they finally decide that it's a lethal threat to the current financial system, it may be more effective for their interests to pump and crash the market at will.

But at the end of the day, there is no easy or obvious way to get rid of Bitcoin, unless the whole Internet is taken down.

 Grin



487. Post 2299882 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: gizmoh on May 28, 2013, 08:35:28 PM
Topping google news:

Bitcoin being amalgamated to Liberty Reserve story:

"A top Bitcoin exchange, Tokyo-based Mt. Gox, failed to register with FinCEN earlier this month and had its U.S. dollar accounts seized by authorities.

Over the past week, a Bitcoin unit has traded at around $130, according to the website Bitcoincharts.com."
 

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/28/net-us-cybercrime-libertyreserve-charges-idUSBRE94R0KQ20130528



It's a joke how they mixed MtGox with the Liberty Reserve thing.

MtGox is very thorough in verifying the identity of its users, LR wasn't. Gox may be amateurish, but they really try to comply with AML regulation, the verification queue was huge at one point and they reject applications because of silly misspellings on the utility bill. And all the apostille and notarization crap you need for "trusted" status.

Yeah, they failed to register to FinCEN, probably because they underestimated the outcome because the project grew too big too fast for them to scale and get somebody competent and experienced on board.

About time.



488. Post 2300104 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Ultraviolet on May 28, 2013, 10:11:13 PM
If the US Government does, we'll see sub 50 in the long term.

$50 it's a lot if you consider that we were at $20 at the end of January.

Anyhow, long term you will see at least 4 figures unless a superior, decentralized and trust-free crypto is developed, or a fatal vulnerability is exposed - regardless of what the US Government decides to do.

There are only 21 millions, did you know?



489. Post 2300623 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 28, 2013, 11:10:14 PM
If the US Government does, we'll see sub 50 in the long term.

$50 it's a lot if you consider that we were at $20 at the end of January.

Anyhow, long term you will see at least 4 figures unless a superior, decentralized and trust-free crypto is developed, or a fatal vulnerability is exposed - regardless of what the US Government decides to do.

There are only 21 millions, did you know?

 Grin  This is that newbie investor thinking that just because something is rare, it's automatically going to be valuable.  

Case in point: you.

Actually you're wrong.  I base Bitcoins value on the markets and what people are willing to pay for them.  The total in circulation is irrelevant to me.   

Maybe you have some trouble to grasp the concept of very scarce a non-inflatable currency.



490. Post 2304099 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: MAbtc on May 29, 2013, 12:05:40 AM
Maybe you have some trouble to grasp the concept of very scarce a non-inflatable currency.
Yeah, and perhaps onecoin truly is the most expensive coin ever.  Roll Eyes

Scarcity principle doesn't apply without the proper demand.

There will be proper demand of Bitcoin regardless of it being legal or illegal in the US, I can guarantee you that.



491. Post 2304156 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: mp420 on May 29, 2013, 07:22:50 AM
There will be proper demand of Bitcoin regardless of it being legal or illegal in the US, I can guarantee you that.

Yes, but if it's going to be illegal, or even semi-illegal in the US, it will be much less attractive as an investment.

There's real, actual demand for BTC, namely drug trade and gambling. They represent less than ten percent of the total demand, everything else is speculative investment.

I would call it a gamble more than an investment. There are so many things that can go south, and one of them is precisely the very real possibility of it being declared illegal by one or more Governments.

I agree that after we reached $20 at the end of January there was an explosion of speculative activity around Bitcoin, and that's why the price skyrocketed so fast. But real demand besides of speculation will grow steadily and quicker than before, now that Bitcoin has been exposed to the whole world.



492. Post 2304213 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 29, 2013, 07:36:28 AM
But real demand besides of speculation will grow steadily and quicker than before, now that Bitcoin has been exposed to the whole world.

I wonder if it will be fast enough to fill the gap left by speculation.

Probably not in the short term, 100% sure in the long term.



493. Post 2304421 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on May 29, 2013, 07:40:10 AM
There will be proper demand of Bitcoin regardless of it being legal or illegal in the US, I can guarantee you that.

Yes, but if it's going to be illegal, or even semi-illegal in the US, it will be much less attractive as an investment.

There's real, actual demand for BTC, namely drug trade and gambling. They represent less than ten percent of the total demand, everything else is speculative investment.

I would call it a gamble more than an investment. There are so many things that can go south, and one of them is precisely the very real possibility of it being declared illegal by one or more Governments.

I agree that after we reached $20 at the en of January there was an explosion of speculative activity around Bitcoin, and that's why the price skyrocketed so fast. But real demand besides of speculation will grow steadily and quicker than before, now that Bitcoin has been exposed to the whole world.

Based on what, gut feeling?  Certainly not facts.  Bitcoin is slow and extremely complicated.  You have to be above average technical to even consider using it and then, who's going to want to when you can't spend it anywhere except to do illegal stuff?  

So, you're doing something that's super complicated.  That's slow and could never handle micro transactions.  That in this scenario presented would be illegal, thus you risk jail time all to buy a digital "currency" that you can only use to buy illegal stuff.  And somehow despite all this, you think it's just going to keep growing and achieve mass adoption?  It is the speculation thread but I think it's a flawed piece of speculation you've laid out.  More like a dream with zero basis in reality.

Based on facts: the demand created by a single Darknet website (Silk Road) + a single gambling website (Satoshidice) is enough to take one BTC to be worth aprox. 14 of your beloved US dollars. Maybe you do not understand that 14 (fourteen) dollars for something like Bitcoin is not trivial (it was worth $0.079 in May 2010 - did you know?)

This is only the beginning. Bitcoin may be very complicated for you, I bet you are well over 30 yo - someone younger wouldn't feel it's so complicated. In fact, we will have a a new generation coming that will grow knowing that there is an "anonymous cash of the internet" in the wild, and they will understand it naturally, something you obviously do not do.

What I'm trying to explain you is that Bitcoin has a HUGE growth potential. It's price already went from $0.07 to $14 because of real but extremely reuced demand, that's a x200 increase in 1 year because of Satoshidice and Silk Road.

And then you have the bubbles, the one we are having now and the 2011 one, created by pure speculative mania - but we can leave those out and concetrate only on real economy demand.

Just wait for more people to slowly understand Bitcoin. For them to understand that they can use it to move freely their wealth - because you knew that there are a lot of countries where there are strict financial controls that restrict people's freedom, don't you? I can tell you a real story it happened to me in Argentina if you wish. And just wait for the "black market" to see how good can be BTC for them (Dread Pirate Roberts is a visionary, but give to his "folks" some years to understand BTC), and for more gambling sites to embrace it.

Sure, it will be a slow process. And that's why is retarded to believe that BTC is a get-rich-quick scheme, and that it will be at 6 figures next year. But there is a fact: BTC won't go away easily. It's here to stay. And solves a lot of real life, important problems related to monetary freedom, and that matter to millions of people in the world, regardless of what the US says.

And think about something, Coinseeker: there have been threats of Bitcoin being declared illegal since day 1. Just use the search of these forums and check the debates about Wikileaks accepting BTC, and how worried Satoshi was (in fact he asked Assange to please don't - read and learn, it's all on the forums). And what you call "a dream with zero basis on reality", is what happened. Real demand grew. And it's growing. And the core demand for BTC is at those who want monetary freedom, not a "quick minitransactions protocol". Because the core characterisitics of Bitcoin are a) decentralized and b) trust-free, and hence unseizable and uncontrollable by Governments. And that very characteristics will attract a very specific real and powerful demand, as they did with Satoshidice and Silk Road.

I wonder what would you have told me in 2010 when bitcoin was at 0.0x, if I told you that some day one BTC was going to be worth $14 on "real demand".

Coinseeker, if you want a fast transaction system for minipayments go and use Dwolla, or even better: Ripple. Bitcoin is not that.




494. Post 2304945 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

@Coinseeker:

1) you don't seem to understand that black market is not "tiny". It's a 1,800 billion/year economy. Do the maths.

2) you don't seem to know that the Bitcoin concept was born in cyberpunk and crypto-anarchists circles, and that was designed with very "unpatriotic" characteristics at its core. It's decentralized and trust-free (do you understand what does this implies for the US Gov and the FED?), and it is conceived from the very beginning to be resilient to Governments attacks. I wonder why someone like you is interested in such a concept.

Then, you mock me up because I said that real demand brought BTC to "a whole $14" from $0.07. You are blind if you do not see how immense growth is x200 in just a couple of years because of the demand generated by two tiny businesses (SD and SR). And you are just plainly ignorant if you do not understand how huge is the potential growth regardless of BTC being banned or semi-illegal. Give it time, and then we will discuss.

Quote from: niothor on May 29, 2013, 08:48:34 AM
Just because the value has gone up to 130 , it doesn't mean there are 10x users than last year or we're doing 10x transactions.

Currently the price is based more on "what bitcoin will be" than is actual value.

True, the current price is based on speculation. The "natural" demand of BTC brought us to $14, and based on current electricity costs (miners won't sell their coins at a loss) the speculation-less price for 1BTC it's around $50. This is hard math, not speculation. Just check the numbers yourself.

Difficulty and thus electricity cost per BTC will keep increasing, and "real economy" around BTC will grow accordingly, as it always did: if there is a global ban (almost impossible), we will still have black market economy + "idealists" using it, and that will lead to steady (but slower) growth. If there is an US ban (unlikely at this point, but a possibility somewhere in the future), we will still have increasing demand all over the rest of the world, which will lead us to exponential growth. If there is no ban at all, even better for us all.

There are only two lethal threats to Bitcoin:

a) the development of a superior crypto-currency with the same core characteristics (trust-free and decentralized and thus immune to Government attacks)
b) a fatal flaw in the technology of the protocol (highly unlikely at this point)

Every other scenario has been analyzed, and Bitcoin is designed to rise stronger from those scenarios, including a Government ban.




495. Post 2306096 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Not a single trade at Gox in the last 6 minutes.

Only 6 trades at Gox in the last 42 minutes.

Jeeeeeeez.... That's slow indeed. Fear, Uncertainity, Doubt? Interest fading out?

A little bit of everything.



496. Post 2306902 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 29, 2013, 01:36:46 PM
I speculate that the price will either rise or fall, one of those two.
I speculate sideways...............

I expect backwardz.

Seconded.



497. Post 2307216 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: dexX7 on May 29, 2013, 02:14:41 PM
X_x almost 50 % of Bitstamp's ask sum (~14.31k) is sitting on the way to 132. Two days ago it was 2k.



I guess those are all sellers who crapped their pants on the Dwolla/Liberty Reserve/OKPay situation.

I assume they are US based, because in other parts of the world we just laugh out loud at the Patriot Act and similar charades.



498. Post 2310190 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Miz4r on May 29, 2013, 07:00:14 PM

Is the same thing happening right now? Interesting stuff...

Expected.

Only coinseeker would sell if the US says "Bitcoin is bad". Normal people will just buy all the coins they can with their fiat and transfer them to their wallets Smiley

Leaving jokes apart, all this is quite bullish for BTC. Despite of MtGox's fuck up, it's a fact that main BTC exchanges are trying to comply with regulations. And the sheriffs that busted LR say clearly that they are NOT after virtual currencies if they abid to FinCEN rules:

http://www.davidnews.com/2013/05/liberty-reserve-laundered-6-billion.html

That's the sheriffs press conference, listen carefully from minute 28:00

Quote
I want to make clear that today's actions does not mean that we are against virtual currencies

And you can see how the guy is implicitly referring to BTC, saying that it's ok if the exchanges are registered as MSB's



499. Post 2310909 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on May 29, 2013, 07:39:43 PM
I don't think anybody was speaking of Bitcoin itself rather than exchanges and anti money laundering regulations.

He was speaking about Bitcoin because he made a precisa reference about the Fincen statement that cited explicitly Bitcoin.

And then he said the they do like innovation, which is pretty much the difference between BTC and LR: the former is an open source, community driven innovative project. The latter was just a business run by a convicted felon that circumvented wittingly regulations.

The point is the feds have realized virtual currencies are a big deal, and that you cannot simply ban a p2p protocol. If they have half a brain they know they have to control as much as possible the fiat->btc conversion and that the ban route is the most ineffective one.

I wouldn't be surprised by an exchange run by JPMorgan, in any case they want to he the market makers as per silver and not been cut out.  Smiley

And if they finally want to get rid of it, there are better strategies than simply ban it.



500. Post 2310951 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on May 29, 2013, 08:26:50 PM
I don't think anybody was speaking of Bitcoin itself rather than exchanges and anti money laundering regulations.

He was speaking about Bitcoin because he made a precisa reference about the Fincen statement that cited explicitly Bitcoin. 

That was still about exchanges.

What he said is that they are not against virtual currencies at all,  they just want exchanges to comply to regulation. 

Thus, they know they cannot simply "shut down" BTC as they did with LR.

That's bullish.



501. Post 2310998 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Richy_T on May 29, 2013, 08:31:21 PM
I agree it's good news for Bitcoin, if it's sincere.  Now submit to regulations and hope for the best.

You still don't get it do you? Exchanges have to play by the rules ofcourse but bitcoin itself can not and will not be regulated. Sorry if that hurts your regulated feelings.

That's why there's a need for a decentralized exchange that can't be touched as well (eg bittorrent). Until then, it's gonna be a risky game playing on these exchanges.

The problem with Bitcoin is fiat.



Yeah, final victory is breaking the loop fiat->btc–>fiat. As long as BTC's value is linked to fiat, they still have an enormous power. They are still the owners of "money", and while they cannot shut down the protocol, they can play with its perceived value at will.

Still, quite a challenge  for the establishment.

Gotta love to be part of this experiment.  Grin



502. Post 2311400 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 29, 2013, 08:48:11 PM

Expected.

Only coinseeker would sell if the US says "Bitcoin is bad". Normal people will just buy all the coins they can with their fiat and transfer them to their wallets Smiley

Leaving jokes apart, all this is quite bullish for BTC. Despite of MtGox's fuck up, it's a fact that main BTC exchanges are trying to comply with regulations. And the sheriffs that busted LR say clearly that they are NOT after virtual currencies if they abid to FinCEN rules:

http://www.davidnews.com/2013/05/liberty-reserve-laundered-6-billion.html

That's the sheriffs press conference, listen carefully from minute 28:00

Quote
I want to make clear that today's actions does not mean that we are against virtual currencies

And you can see how the guy is implicitly referring to BTC, saying that it's ok if the exchanges are registered as MSB's

Thanks for the link. I like how he starts off - "This might be the biggest international money laundering case..."   NO - HSBC 8 billion and Wachovia 100's of billions.

And he went on to say "To the contrary, mobile and internet based financial technologies, including virtual currencies, have great promise to empower consumers, to encourage the development of innovative financial products and expand access to financial services. In fact FinCen issued guidance in March 2013 to bring clarity and regulatory certainty to businesses and individuals...."

" Those offering virtual currencies must comply with these regulatory requirements and if they do so they have nothing to fear..."



Thanks for the transcription, I was too lazy to do it.

"Virtual currencies have great promise to empower consumers"

"They have nothing to fear"

He really wanted to make it clear.



503. Post 2316288 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 30, 2013, 09:09:56 AM
The moment we free ourselves from the tyranny of the goverment and become free...

I'm selling you my laptop and all my bitcoins for a bow , 10 arrows and a blanket.

A common reaction. People often imagine that without centrally enforced rules, everything would instantly dissolve into a dog-eat-dog war zone with people killing other people at random, looting, raping and taking a shit in front of your door (someone once provided this as an argument in this very same discussion with me..). As if the only thing stopping people from acting this way right now is the looming threat of imprisonment and punishment by the legal system. Divide and conquer still seems to be working quite well.

Have you ever noticed that laws are there for OTHER people? As in the laws are here to prevent other people from killing me and stealing my stuff. Not to prevent me from doing the same. I'm a decent fellow. It's those other bastards...  Grin

A little reminder. http://silverdoctors.com/one-year-in-hellsurviving-a-full-shtf-collapse-in-bosnia/


People living a quiet life eating pies with their neighbours and talking about how bad their goverment is with a beer in their hands don't have a clue what happens when there is no central authority.

The same neighbour will kill you for food simply because he doesn't want to die first.
Armed gang will soon appear because it's human nature to seek power and to gain control , also to ensure your own life. Kill before getting killed.

What happend is former Yugoslavia and what happend right after the fall of mother Russia in the ex-soviets states is a clear example.

Ps. I live close to the serbian-romanian border , so the shit going there was real.


When we treat other people as "competitors" then stealing and such when times get tough is a predictable outcome. But we have known no other form of government and economics. We are taught in the schools that Darwin was right, when nature shows us cooperation is right. (Even with Lions hunting prey, Nature is mostly a brilliant example of cooperation).


Kropotkin pretty much demonstrated in his "Mutual Aid" anthropological masterpiece that cooperation between members of the same species its not only natural but necessary in the broader fight for survival.

But, that's what capitalism and social darwinists turned upside down. I guess there are too many humans on earth, and nature is regulating itself pushing us to an unsustainable and self-destructive system (wild capitalism).

Back to the wall observing: weekly volume is getting lower and lower since the correction/bubble burst (still too soon to decide what was that - which is funny because all of us would have bet that 1 month and a half after the April 10th crash we would have know for sure if that crash was a bubble pop or a correction)




504. Post 2317181 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on May 30, 2013, 11:07:51 AM
In other news ...

ouch

Quote
Dear Mt. Gox Customers,

In order to comply with strict anti-money laundering regulations we are now requiring account verifications for all accounts performing non-Bitcoin currency deposits and withdrawals. Please see our statement for the full explanation:

https://mtgox.com/press_release_20130530.html

Best regards,

Mt. Gox Team

Not a great surprise really ... I would imagine anyone who does not want to be verified has been getting their cash off Gox or buying BTC post Dwolla

Interesting though is the use of the phrase 'at this time' wrt BTC withdrawals ... implication to me is that it is a possibility in the future

Bullish news, this is just gasoline for the choo choo train.

Buy now, when big boys come with big money because they are sure they are safe, the train will have left the station and you don't want to be left behind.



505. Post 2318971 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Hawkix on May 30, 2013, 12:32:41 PM
ouch

Quote
Dear Mt. Gox Customers,

In order to comply with strict anti-money laundering regulations we are now requiring account verifications for all accounts performing non-Bitcoin currency deposits and withdrawals. Please see our statement for the full explanation:

https://mtgox.com/press_release_20130530.html

Best regards,

Mt. Gox Team

Well, just all wait till the day MtGox get hacked (again) or seized by government. Suddenly, all those Bitcoin addresses used to fund/withdraw will be cleanly linked to your ID, photo, bank account, postal address. Nice.

 Angry  Angry

This is a real risk everybody trading significant amounts of fiat for BTC is exposed to - now and also in the past. If you are dealing with peanuts, you can get away with dealing with BTC anonymously. But if you are trading high 6 figures of fiat (and those guys, together with the 7 figures players are the market makers, and not the Dwolla users) you need to be ultra-verified with notarized documents in any case.



506. Post 2319107 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

What about ignoring Coinseeker and not quoting him at all?



507. Post 2319196 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on May 30, 2013, 03:14:15 PM
ouch

Quote
Dear Mt. Gox Customers,

In order to comply with strict anti-money laundering regulations we are now requiring account verifications for all accounts performing non-Bitcoin currency deposits and withdrawals. Please see our statement for the full explanation:

https://mtgox.com/press_release_20130530.html

Best regards,

Mt. Gox Team

Well, just all wait till the day MtGox get hacked (again) or seized by government. Suddenly, all those Bitcoin addresses used to fund/withdraw will be cleanly linked to your ID, photo, bank account, postal address. Nice.

 Angry  Angry

This is a real risk everybody trading significant amounts of fiat for BTC is exposed to - now and also in the past. If you are dealing with peanuts, you can get away with dealing with BTC anonymously. But if you are trading high 6 figures of fiat (and those guys, together with the 7 figures players are the market makers, and not the Dwolla users) you need to be ultra-verified with notarized documents in any case.

I think people moving millions are probably working with special agreements with GOX. Their money isn't going 'poof' overnight anytime soon.

I think the REAL question no one is asking is when exchanges are going to be forced to play bitcoin police for stolen BTC. That's the real question.

Maybe some of the people dealing with millions have some "special agreement" with Gox, but I can guarantee you that at least some of those dealing with hundreds of thousands are not.

And consider that there are a lot of people in here whose bitcoins were worth let's say $30,000 6 months ago, and now those BTC are worth $300,000. That people needs to be registered with notarized documents + apostille if they want to be able to withdraw more than $10,000 per day (and $50,000 max per month), which is a pain in the ass because you also lose a lot of money in commissions (Gox's, Gox's bank, your own bank... You just want to withdraw as much as possible in one shot or you lose money).



508. Post 2320461 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on May 30, 2013, 05:19:42 PM
Please give us a bear trap first, I want to buy a few more cheap coins before we move up. Tongue

I really can't stand the words cheap coins anymore for some reason.

You never could... Maybe you bought for the first time recently, so your average buying price is pretty much close to the current spot price.

But don't worry... In a couple of years BTC price will be waaaaaaay higher, and you will scream for cheap coins as we do, so you can increase your stash at the best possible price Wink



509. Post 2321025 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on May 30, 2013, 06:15:38 PM
And for the first time ever, that I have seen anyway,

MtGox - $130.03
Bitstamp - $130.53

From this day forward MtGox shall be known as "Magic of the gathering exchange"  Grin

And yet, as I write this, MtGox is higher again.

Very interesting...

That just shows that there is some buying pressure. For the whole march bitstamp was higher than  mtgox.

ch000000000000 ch000000000000!!!!!!!!!!!111!!!11!!!

Goat: pics of the lambo or it didn't happen. Cheesy



510. Post 2321187 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on May 30, 2013, 06:31:17 PM
ch000000000000 ch000000000000!!!!!!!!!!!111!!!11!!!

Hope you dint mean choo choo to 111, toying with our emotions, that would be very wrong.  Grin

That scared me too. I won't bother checking the price.

Really, Bitstamp was more all of March than MtGox? Interesting. I guess now it is more meaningful due to the DHS thing...

Yeah. Bitstamp has not always been behind - for many days it's been ahead - but nevertheless chasing Gox from one side or the other.



511. Post 2322191 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: NamelessOne on May 30, 2013, 08:05:06 PM
This needs an ask wall to work.
Yes, the 4k seller is just a weak hand or someone seriously gambling and hoping to cause a drop.

Or just someone that needed his $500k for a new cozy flat.



512. Post 2322587 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

No fear until $125 is broken



513. Post 2323484 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

I'm the only feeling bad for the poor bear hit by the car?




514. Post 2323865 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

fiat slowly sinking at Gox




515. Post 2326590 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Gatekeeper on May 31, 2013, 02:12:45 AM
after the first crash steadied itself the price flatlined at $15 for a good while from the $32 high, that's about 45% off the high, now we are in almost the same situation, high of $266 and holding around $128-$132, which is just under 50% again. So the market is not really surprising me. It does seem though that either we'll slowly crawl upwards and bubble 3 will start or it will crumble, it's so hard to tell, no matter what bulls or bears say. After the first crash we managed to pull out of it and bitcoin survived to go on and and hit 8.3x the old ATH, and we're in the same situation again, if Bitcoin grows as the VC people in Silicon Valley want then we could easily see bubble 3 with much higher highs than $266, but at the same time there is potential for bitcoin to crumble. Interesting times really, and no one really knows what's going to happen because it's major future events that will dictate where we go and it obviously depends on the next stage of bitcoins evolution, either it flourishes and becomes widely accepted creating bubble 3 or it gets hammered down on by regulators and governments and people just cash out what they can and walk away.

There are definitely similarities to 2011, especially looking at the charts. Also in the level of FUD spreading: is "the Government will go after BTC" the new "exchange was hacked and everybody lost everything"?

I just missing those bitter posts about Bitcoin being a Ponzi and Satoshi its very own Maddoff (but of course those posts peaked on November, just approaching the very $2 bottom).

To the contrary, just after April 10th 2013 we had lots of good news and positive media coverage - which didn't have at all in 2011.

I guess we are approaching the moment in which we will see clearly if the April 10th crash was a bubble pop or a correction. If we break $125, I expect to creep down slowly.

No way so deep as in 2011, but deeper than most permabulls expect.



516. Post 2326721 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: favelle75 on May 31, 2013, 07:26:30 AM
1st rule of ANY stock-type item is that past performance is NEVER indicative of future performance.  It doesn't matter what the eff BCT did in the past. That has no bearing on its future.

Sure. If you read my post history you will see I scream: "this is no 2011". I said many times that IMO the very post crash bottom was $50, which is a bullish indicator taking into account we were at $14 in January. But it's still interesting to point out both differences and similarities to the summer of 2011 situation.

Past performance may not be an indicative of future performance, but it's fun watching people saying similar things in similar situations, and making the same mistakes - over and over.



517. Post 2327084 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):




518. Post 2327618 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Who said yesterday that fiat in Gox's order book was "actually increasing"?

It's going down steadily, at a rate of $1M less each 2/3 days.

At Bitstamp we have only $935k ATM, which is less than we had one week ago (aprox. $1.05M).

Where's the fiat going? Profit taking? Bears crapping their pants?

Good. Cheaper coins for the rest of us.




519. Post 2327658 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Miz4r on May 31, 2013, 10:17:56 AM
I don't think there is really much room or momentum for a downward trend, we're looking oversold right now and if you look at the bid sum/ask sum ratio it's still quite a bit higher than the current price. So that means there is still an overabundance of fiat sitting on the orderbook, even though overall both fiat and btc have been leaving the book lately.

Yes - but where is it going? Surely not to Bitstamp, even if wishful thinking could lead us to believe that. Some coins went indeed from Gox to Bitstamp (but still a small amount compared to the amount that vanished from Gox's order book), but the fiat is nowhere to be seen.

I know is slower to move fiat - but anyhow this "draining" process started aprox. 15 days ago. If fiat was stampeding to Bitstamp we would have seen it, and the numbers just don't add up.

So... Scared bears with pockets full of fiat, willing to cash out profits for good? It's true there is not much moment (not upwards, not downwards), but cheaper coins are expected unless some whales hop on the train - which can always happen, Bitcoin market is so ridiculously tiny that just a couple of 7 figures players can change the trend in the blink of an eye.



520. Post 2327742 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: wonker on May 31, 2013, 10:26:36 AM
I don't think there is really much room or momentum for a downward trend, we're looking oversold right now and if you look at the bid sum/ask sum ratio it's still quite a bit higher than the current price. So that means there is still an overabundance of fiat sitting on the orderbook, even though overall both fiat and btc have been leaving the book lately.

Yes - but where is it going? Surely not to Bitstamp, even if wishful thinking could lead us to believe that. Some coins went indeed from Gox to Bitstamp (but still a small amount compared to the amount that vanished from Gox's order book), but the fiat is nowhere to be seen.

I know is slower to move fiat - but anyhow this "draining" process started aprox. 15 days ago. If fiat was stampeding to Bitstamp we would have seen it, and the numbers just don't add up.

So... Scared bears with pockets full of fiat, willing to cash out profits for good? It's true there is not much moment (not upwards, not downwards), but cheaper coins are expected unless some whales hop on the train - which can always happen, Bitcoin market is so ridiculously tiny that just a couple of 7 figures players can change the trend in the blink of an eye.

Not on Gox´s order book doesnt mean neccessary not on Gox or?

Of course there is fiat on Gox which is not on the order book, but the quantity in the order book is nevertheless related with the total amount sitting on Gox. You can speculate about what is the order book/non order book ratio, but you can be sure it's a pretty consistent proportion when you take out of the equation big short-term moves where people just pull their bids so they are not eaten by the bears.

You know... Having big quantities of money on Gox for long periods without ever placing it on the order book it's just pointless.



521. Post 2327818 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Miz4r on May 31, 2013, 10:49:49 AM
Yes - but where is it going? Surely not to Bitstamp, even if wishful thinking could lead us to believe that. Some coins went indeed from Gox to Bitstamp (but still a small amount compared to the amount that vanished from Gox's order book), but the fiat is nowhere to be seen.

I know is slower to move fiat - but anyhow this "draining" process started aprox. 15 days ago. If fiat was stampeding to Bitstamp we would have seen it, and the numbers just don't add up.

So... Scared bears with pockets full of fiat, willing to cash out profits for good? It's true there is not much moment (not upwards, not downwards), but cheaper coins are expected unless some whales hop on the train - which can always happen, Bitcoin market is so ridiculously tiny that just a couple of 7 figures players can change the trend in the blink of an eye.

I think people just want to stay away from the exchanges right now because of all the turmoil around Dwolla and regulation lately. So bears cash out and remove their fiat, and bulls take out their bitcoins and store them until things are more clear regarding exchanges and regulations.

Add to that the bubble-burst effect (less interest, etc.), and there you have money saying "bye bye" to exchanges.

I have to admit I withdrew all the coins I had on Gox and I stopped trading for the last 3/4 days. Next week I will still send some fresh fiat I'm managing for a couple friends to Gox, but I will place my bids quite low, wait and see. All the indicators are screaming "down" ATM.



522. Post 2327948 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Miz4r on May 31, 2013, 11:04:01 AM
Yes - but where is it going? Surely not to Bitstamp, even if wishful thinking could lead us to believe that. Some coins went indeed from Gox to Bitstamp (but still a small amount compared to the amount that vanished from Gox's order book), but the fiat is nowhere to be seen.

I know is slower to move fiat - but anyhow this "draining" process started aprox. 15 days ago. If fiat was stampeding to Bitstamp we would have seen it, and the numbers just don't add up.

So... Scared bears with pockets full of fiat, willing to cash out profits for good? It's true there is not much moment (not upwards, not downwards), but cheaper coins are expected unless some whales hop on the train - which can always happen, Bitcoin market is so ridiculously tiny that just a couple of 7 figures players can change the trend in the blink of an eye.

I think people just want to stay away from the exchanges right now because of all the turmoil around Dwolla and regulation lately. So bears cash out and remove their fiat, and bulls take out their bitcoins and store them until things are more clear regarding exchanges and regulations.

Add to that the bubble-burst effect (less interest, etc.), and there you have money saying "bye bye" to exchanges.

I have to admit I withdrew all the coins I had on Gox and I stopped trading for the last 3/4 days. Next week I will still send some fresh fiat I'm managing for a couple friends to Gox, but I will place my bids quite low, wait and see. All the indicators are screaming "down" ATM.

Which indicators? I'm afraid I don't see it. The uncertainty about exchanges has been here for a while and we've only been going up since then, except for the quick spike downwards right after the Dwolla news. Now we found resistance above $135 some people decided it was a good time to cash in their profits, and now we're sitting at $128. I see no indication of it going further down, I'm curious to find out what indicators you're looking at.

I'm looking at a decreasing volume and a decreasing buying pressure. I'm looking at bearish triangles about complete. I'm also looking at a wary and "wait and see" sentiment after Gox's fuck up with its FinCEN registration. I'm also looking at the similarities between today and 2011 post-crash, but this last point is pretty useless as there are many differences too that invalidate any type of correlation.

IMO the best thing that could happen to short-term bulls would be to test $125 with BIG volume, and not breaking it - if that happens, the only way is UP. If $125 is broken, expect much cheaper coins and longer decline.

Anyhow, I'm still mid and long term bull - just let me be clear on the fact that everything above $50 is ultra-bullish in my book. Jeez, we were trading at $14 just in January. I cannot take that out from my mind Wink



523. Post 2328126 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: micalith on May 31, 2013, 11:42:32 AM
bitcoincharts and bitcoinity not loading! something about to happen?

Yes.... the FEDs.... knock knock knocking on Bitcoin's dooooouoor... Hey, Hey, Hey Hey Hey!

LOL

Both bitcoincharts and bitcoinity working for me BTW Cheesy



524. Post 2332291 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 31, 2013, 07:10:15 PM
we'll see if the wall at 125 moving back again.  Grin

if i was the owner i would

I think breaking below 125 123 could fire some triggers that might lead all the way down to 100ish


Definitely, at least to $103, and we would have broke the higher lows trend



525. Post 2334280 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on May 31, 2013, 10:20:07 PM
People aren't falling for it anymore, at least not enough. Doubt a 15k wall would work. Not enough interest for a real rally today.


Definitely a bear signal....  If he can't raise the price enough to unload his BTC in a controlled fashion, then he'll be dumping his holdings at market!

You're saying he is holding over a million dollars in fiat, and uses that to prop up the price to unload his BTC? In order to do that he would have to have a couple million dollars on the exchange (for fiat + BTC). I somehow doubt that is the case. And seeing the same is happening on EU and GBP market I believe this can't be just one single person doing this, it has to be coordinated.

Some here have huge stack of BTCs. HUGE stacks. As in "loaded the truck when they were 10 cents a piece" huge.
Having multiple millions of dollars really isn't that far-fetched.

Pretty much this. When you are loaded, a bit of simple manipulation (as per Goomboo's "hammer") it's just profitable. Those walls chasing the price and suddenly disappearing just after or just before a significant move on the opposite side have a clear purpose.



526. Post 2334729 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Speculate:

What's wollzilla's intention?

Prop the price up so he can dump and run?

Or just a desperate bull?

Occam's razor



527. Post 2338206 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Bitcycle on June 01, 2013, 04:18:41 AM
Wallzilla killed the volume.

I'm really curious as to why there's a wall in many currencies.

Gox has only one market for all currencies.  The bids/asks in any given currency are converted to show in all other currencies, with a exchange fee built in.  The fee does not go to Gox, since they ironically are not licensed to exchange between various fiat currencies. Instead the fee goes to their bank, which does the actual fiat exchange.

The upshot is that if you place a bid in USD it shows up in Pounds, Euros, Baht, whatever else as well.

Source: MagicalTux in irc a few weeks ago.






That's how it works. It's in their FAQ, BTW



528. Post 2338212 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: gandhibt on June 01, 2013, 08:51:42 AM
Wallzilla killed the volume.

I'm really curious as to why there's a wall in many currencies.

Gox has only one market for all currencies.  The bids/asks in any given currency are converted to show in all other currencies, with a exchange fee built in.  The fee does not go to Gox, since they ironically are not licensed to exchange between various fiat currencies. Instead the fee goes to their bank, which does the actual fiat exchange.

The upshot is that if you place a bid in USD it shows up in Pounds, Euros, Baht, whatever else as well.

Source: MagicalTux in irc a few weeks ago.

This is the most natural thing a multi-currency exchange should do. Of course if they take too high fees, others can do arbitrage for cheaper. Basically if the fee is 1%, an actual $$ wall should be 1% stronger than the auto-arbitrage-€-wall. A "buy 1000Ƀ@$120" would be a "buy 1000Ƀ@$119.8" in all other currencies. If you can exchange $$ for €€ cheaper, you can squeeze your offer in between.

USD


EUR


What explains that the walls are different size in different currency?

They are adjusted to relative volume.



529. Post 2338658 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Zephir on June 01, 2013, 10:58:27 AM
Wallzilla killed the volume.

I'm really curious as to why there's a wall in many currencies.

Gox has only one market for all currencies.  The bids/asks in any given currency are converted to show in all other currencies, with a exchange fee built in.  The fee does not go to Gox, since they ironically are not licensed to exchange between various fiat currencies. Instead the fee goes to their bank, which does the actual fiat exchange.

The upshot is that if you place a bid in USD it shows up in Pounds, Euros, Baht, whatever else as well.

Source: MagicalTux in irc a few weeks ago.






That's how it works. It's in their FAQ, BTW


That´s not right.
Every currency has its own market on Gox.
Look at the Canadian Dollar chart or at the polish Zloty at Gox and compare it with the USD,GBP or EUR chart.
Every market has another volume.

Think before you type.

First, Bitcycle told you he is quoting Karpeles from IRC, so you should give him some credit.

Secondly, I'm telling you to check it in Gox's FAQ

Thirdly, and most important, look at the different currencies at Gox. You will see that if there was independent ask/bids for every currency, there would be no liquidity in any market except the USD. Then, check the walls. Isn't it strange for you that you have walls of the same proportion in every currency?

And finally, check MtGox's FAQ:

Quote
Q. Do you keep independent ask/bid tables for different currencies?

A. No, ask/bid tables for different currencies are not independent. All currencies are relative to whichever currency has the highest volume, which is based on said currencies current market price in bitcoin. Every trade is in one pool and in fact, not are not separate currency markets. This allows users the added benefit of trading in "the greater market" -in currencies they understand- while not limiting them to smaller currency markets.

For example, if a buy order for bitcoins is placed in EUR, the order can be executed against another user selling bitcoins in any currency and not necessarily only against another user selling bitcoins in EUR.

EDIT: well, niothor was quicker than me Wink



530. Post 2338742 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Wallzilla to the rescue Cheesy




531. Post 2338776 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Zephir on June 01, 2013, 11:22:48 AM
Just another question.
Why is the wall not on every currency at bitcoinity?

It's on every currency but its "height" depends on relative volume, thus you may see it much smaller in some currencies.

For the two currencies with bigger volume (USD and EUR) you will usually see the walls with pretty much the same proportion.



532. Post 2348029 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 02, 2013, 10:29:45 AM
I think some try to read too much into this, it's just big players trying to manipulate the market to their advantage. There is no reason to get wet dreams about $50 already, bitcoin does whatever the fuck it wants. Perhaps tomorrow it will rally up to $140. At least that sounds more likely than seeing $50 again just because some whales had a pillow fight just now. Tongue

That's what scares me the most. The amount of people who can't wait for the price to drop to 50. Their greed is more important to them than the coin surviving at all.
I doubt they even realize how very bad a drop to 50 right now would be.

The coin will survive even if it goes to single digits, and then it will rise stronger.

As it did in 2011.



533. Post 2349724 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: zemario on June 02, 2013, 11:52:45 AM
I think some try to read too much into this, it's just big players trying to manipulate the market to their advantage. There is no reason to get wet dreams about $50 already, bitcoin does whatever the fuck it wants. Perhaps tomorrow it will rally up to $140. At least that sounds more likely than seeing $50 again just because some whales had a pillow fight just now. Tongue

That's what scares me the most. The amount of people who can't wait for the price to drop to 50. Their greed is more important to them than the coin surviving at all.
I doubt they even realize how very bad a drop to 50 right now would be.

Wrong, a sell off down to $50 assuming it held would make a triple bottom and would form a good basis for going up from there.

If only it wouldn't go up so fast.

Remember the price was $50 only a few weeks ago.

You are seriously saying a crash to 50 at this point wouldn't cause massive loss in confidence? You are joking right?

No, people just want to sound badass. It's the absurd attitude of "oh, i'm not afraid of price drops,it's food for me, I earn money with it".

It's pathetic indeed... noobs learn the hard way that trading is just a complicated way to loose money in the long run. Investing is a fundamentally different thing than trading. But those who know how to invest are just a tiny amount of people compared to the huge wave of dumb big mouth pseudo-traders.

It's absurd to look at a 120->50 drop as an opportunity to get 'cheap coins'. What are 'cheap coins'? Where is it written that bitcoins will worth much more than they do now even if they can drop to 50 every now and then? 50 usd might be extremely expensive coins if bitcoin goes down to 1 usd.

Look at the posts yesterday... no mention whatsoever about a price drop. someone dumps a huge amount of BTC on MtGox then suddenly everybody was expecting it and was just waiting for an opportunity to buy coins. Yeah, sure.
Funny thing no one even thinks about the perfect opportunity that the seller caught. There was a massive bid wall, whomever had a big amount of coins to sell could comfortably do it without seeing their order stretching over a 20 dollar wide price range beyond the trading price. It was nothing but the perfect timing to cash out to fiat if you had a big amount of BTC.

It's the same when the walls show up. Everybody is a market analysis specialist and is 100% sure of their stupid explanation of how every wall is 'obviously market manipulation'. I find it quite entertaining, just look at the market the last couple of weeks. Bitstamp wall is 2~3 weeks old and has held there with the price scratching it every now and then, MtGox wall gets consumed. Manipulation theorists could simply shut up, but they are already busy saying that they have always been bears.


What are you talking about?

Quote from: Rampion on May 31, 2013, 10:23:04 AM
cheaper coins are expected unless some whales hop on the train


Quote from: Rampion on May 31, 2013, 10:53:13 AM
All the indicators are screaming "down" ATM.

I'm on my cell phone so I cannot easily quote more posts from other members, but I can guarantee you that there were a lot of posts screaming about a move downwards during last week.

As I said many times, breaking $125 is a clear trend reversal signal. Expect sub $100 coins very soon. If $80 is broken, expect testing again $50. If that support level is not broken, that's still a bullish sign considering that 1 BTC costed $14 in January this year.

IMO $50 is going to be the very post-bubble bottom, we won't going to go under that level. If we do, we will have a 2011-like scenario.



534. Post 2351946 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Page 666 Cool

The point here is that there is no buying pressure at all.



535. Post 2352102 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 02, 2013, 08:39:06 PM
Speaking of the devil: my XRPs' BTC value has appreciated more than 20% in last two days.
Don't shoot me...

EDIT: before you call me names, I hold both BTC and XRP. And I ain't selling any.
At 6000 XRP per BTC, that would make the Ripple market cap 16.66 million BTC or ~2 billion USD. Surely not a bubble.

Crazy shit indeed. And look at the volume: is nothing. You buy/sell XRPs for a mere 50BTC value and you move the price by 30%

LOL



536. Post 2352308 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Wow. Less than $14m on Goxs order book.

And on Bitstamp, just a little over $900k.

When fiat goes away....

....cheaper coins ahead.

There will be nice buying opportunities.




537. Post 2352627 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Miz4r on June 02, 2013, 09:14:55 PM
Wow. Less than $14m on Goxs order book.

And on Bitstamp, just a little over $900k.

When fiat goes away....

....cheaper coins ahead.

There will be nice buying opportunities.

Wow. Less than 113k bitcoins on Goxs order book.

When coins go away...

....more expensive coins ahead.

There will be nice selling opportunities.

Never forget to look at the other side of the coin. Wink

That's wishful thinking. As I told you on May, 31st, when BTC was traded at $128/$130:

Quote from: Rampion on May 31, 2013, 10:53:13 AM
All the indicators are screaming "down" ATM.

Now even more so, as $125 fell with no resistance whatsoever.

There's no buying pressure. New investors are vary aware of the fact that we may very well be in the middle of post-bubble burst correction, and there is no hurry to buy. At all.



538. Post 2352635 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on June 02, 2013, 09:31:50 PM
Speaking of the devil: my XRPs' BTC value has appreciated more than 20% in last two days.
Don't shoot me...

EDIT: before you call me names, I hold both BTC and XRP. And I ain't selling any.
At 6000 XRP per BTC, that would make the Ripple market cap 16.66 million BTC or ~2 billion USD. Surely not a bubble.
Wait, what? 6000 XRP per BTC, and I got 20k for free, that means they're worth 3.3 BTC now or about 400 bucks? LOL... where's the best place to sell em?

Inside Ripple, they have their own exchange built-in.

Just be sure you get BTC/Bitstamp, and not BTC/Tradefortress Cheesy



539. Post 2352772 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on June 02, 2013, 10:01:00 PM
Hmm, I have to install the ripple client? I only find source code on their website...  Cheesy I don't use bitstamp no, at least not yet  Smiley

No, there's no Ripple client yet AFAIK, you can do it through their web.



540. Post 2356818 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: gizmoh on June 03, 2013, 09:56:22 AM


I interpret that as it's going to edge between 122-123 by the end of the day, with little resistance to a full rebound to 128-130 as cash starts flowing in towards the end of the week!

Those big sellers haven't bought back in yet. I wonder if they've not finished selling, and they're waiting for your prediction to come true before mega-dumping again, or that they have finished selling and they're anticipating some further downtrend before buying back in again. Or, they're really cashing out, and there are more like them to follow for similar reasons (fincen vs illegitimate business etc). Either way, I'd expect us to be testing 115 again within a week or two.

Expect a test of 100 rather.

This. The test of $115 will happen muuuuuuuch earlier than "within a week or two".

Fasten your seatbelts, gentlemen. The post-crash upwards trend was officially broken yesterday.



541. Post 2356998 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: micalith on June 03, 2013, 10:14:44 AM


I interpret that as it's going to edge between 122-123 by the end of the day, with little resistance to a full rebound to 128-130 as cash starts flowing in towards the end of the week!

Those big sellers haven't bought back in yet. I wonder if they've not finished selling, and they're waiting for your prediction to come true before mega-dumping again, or that they have finished selling and they're anticipating some further downtrend before buying back in again. Or, they're really cashing out, and there are more like them to follow for similar reasons (fincen vs illegitimate business etc). Either way, I'd expect us to be testing 115 again within a week or two.

Expect a test of 100 rather.

This. The test of $115 will happen muuuuuuuch earlier than "within a week or two".

Fasten your seatbelts, gentlemen. The post-crash upwards trend was officially broken yesterday.

I hope that's a coincidence that it just started dropping right after your post!


I have to say that just before posting I sold 20% of my BTC holdings at $119ish. Not because I'm willing to "catch the bottom", I immediately ordered a fiat withdrawal for those funds, it's because I'm willing to invest in ASICs and I'm going to pay with fiat to get a little "buyer protection", and I'm pretty sure the price will go down during this week.

Edit: obviously it's a decision that I made this very morning, if I had decided to invest fiat in ASICs earlier I would have sold at $133ish last week, but that's life.



542. Post 2357090 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Down down down...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=F7xWQEHLhCs#!

Cheesy



543. Post 2357315 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on June 03, 2013, 11:14:05 AM


I interpret that as it's going to edge between 122-123 by the end of the day, with little resistance to a full rebound to 128-130 as cash starts flowing in towards the end of the week!

Those big sellers haven't bought back in yet. I wonder if they've not finished selling, and they're waiting for your prediction to come true before mega-dumping again, or that they have finished selling and they're anticipating some further downtrend before buying back in again. Or, they're really cashing out, and there are more like them to follow for similar reasons (fincen vs illegitimate business etc). Either way, I'd expect us to be testing 115 again within a week or two.

Expect a test of 100 rather.

This. The test of $115 will happen muuuuuuuch earlier than "within a week or two".

Fasten your seatbelts, gentlemen. The post-crash upwards trend was officially broken yesterday.

I hope that's a coincidence that it just started dropping right after your post!


I have to say that just before posting I sold 20% of my BTC holdings at $119ish. Not because I'm willing to "catch the bottom", I immediately ordered a fiat withdrawal for those funds, it's because I'm willing to invest in ASICs and I'm going to pay with fiat to get a little "buyer protection", and I'm pretty sure the price will go down during this week.

Edit: obviously it's a decision that I made this very morning, if I had decided to invest fiat in ASICs earlier I would have sold at $133ish last week, but that's life.
Nice, but if you believe what you're preaching, why not sell more?

Because I only trade with play money, or with fresh fiat looking for the best entry point. So, I'm more an "investor" than a "trader".

Plus, I tried to trade with some "real" money during the crash to $79, and I sold at the very bottom. I had to buy back losing aprox. 15BTC in the process. I promised to myself that I wasn't going to speculate with my dear coins, it hurts too much when you lose some of them in the way.

Anyhow, I'm sending another 15% to the exchange right now, that's the maximum amount I will liquidate - not to speculate, but because I'm buying ASIC gear with that money.



544. Post 2357991 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

My dear "Wall Observer" friends: SELL SELL SELL

The US is about to wake up

Still 2 confirmations to go for some of my BTC to reach Gox, hope I'm able to sell before the Bearapocalypse Cheesy



545. Post 2358398 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Be grateful guys, I sold a bunch of coins like half an hour ago (crashing the EURO market 1,5% BTW, what a joke is this tiny market), and obviously as soon as I took my dump the price immediately rebounded

LOL Cheesy



546. Post 2358527 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: ardana123 on June 03, 2013, 02:20:07 PM
all these dumbasses shouting "sell Sell SELL" or "down Down DOWN"... I hope you get severely burned.

Man, why all those bad feelings? We are all perma-bulls deep inside, and we're in this just for the lulz. Relax, my friend.



547. Post 2359352 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

LOOOOL

The Choo Choo train about to leave the station... Again???

Cheesy




548. Post 2359382 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

WTF? Bitstamp is now leading and Gox is following?

Good Wink



549. Post 2359447 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: niothor on June 03, 2013, 04:07:00 PM

WTF is Nov 1st ??

just a random date  Grin

Probably listening to guns n' roses and fealing lonely on the bathroom floor

Here you have, my dear, for you and Adam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SbUC-UaAxE



550. Post 2359455 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: Odalv on June 03, 2013, 04:09:53 PM
Well at least we can say that people are getting their bitcoins out of gox Smiley)

https://blockchain.info/address/1LNWw6yCxkUmkhArb2Nf2MPw6vG7u5WG7q

Final Balance    -700.50692598 BTC

lol what a wallet can have -BTC ??

Looks like bug.

A bug? In the blockchain?

OMG, SELL SELL SELL

Cheesy



551. Post 2359577 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

And here we have blockexplorer's reply:

https://blockexplorer.com/address/1LNWw6yCxkUmkhArb2Nf2MPw6vG7u5WG7q

(Disclaimer: only for the strong-hearted and cold-minded)




552. Post 2360414 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Check this techcrunch article, it comes with the ultimate perma-bull calculator, you can tweak different variables in it (including % of success for BTC) and get how much one BTC will be worth.

http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/02/calculating-the-long-term-value-of-a-bitcoin/

I will tell you something: regardless of what you put in that calculator, it goes to high 4 digits, and it tells you:

BUY



553. Post 2360512 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on June 03, 2013, 06:07:54 PM
Check this techcrunch article, it comes with the ultimate perma-bull calculator, you can tweak different variables in it (including % of success for BTC) and get how much one BTC will be worth.

http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/02/calculating-the-long-term-value-of-a-bitcoin/

I will tell you something: regardless of what you put in that calculator, it goes to high 4 digits, and it tells you:

BUY

I just entered 0.01% everywhere with 100% success rate and got $66.

What?? I cannot enter less than 1%



554. Post 2360922 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Jeeeeez, I'm such a sick Bitcoin permabull that as soon as I smell downward pressure I get all excited and I start sending fiat to exchanges like a mad man, willing to fulfill my wet dream of reaching the 5 figures in BTC, then I realize that 4 figures is good enough, then I read the techcrunch article with the "Bitcoin long term value calculator" and I go berserk again... Wash, rinse, repeat.

I will only say a couple of things:

Love the bear, he is the one selling us cheap coins

Hold on the motherfucking Bitcoin, he won't let you down, as he did not let down anyone with strong hands and cold mind since this baby was born in 2009

Don't be a pussy, Bitcoin will change the world, and the real winners in this game will be those who holded and increased their stashes crash after crash, bubble burst after bubble burst.

And now, enjoy the ride, it will be a bumpy one, and welcome the cheap coins ahead.



555. Post 2362129 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on June 03, 2013, 08:59:25 PM
Looking at past action, you would always do well to hold (unless you can call those tops and bottoms like a pro - but do you want to get caught with your pants down considering what we are talking about with BTC?)

Interesting...
If really you want to be the careful type, shouldn't you wait on the sideline with your fiat ready, as price has a tendency to fall faster than going up?

There's always the fear of a black swan event rocketing bitcoin into the sky. I don't know why, but I think many bulls have this fear including myself. I don't like to sit on the sidelines for too long, I can sit out a weekend but that's it really. Tongue
Imagine selling all your BTC and then seeing the price just leave you behind, forever...? having to buy in at a massive loss or just accept it's game over, buy that ferrari you never really needed and not look back? Bitcoin is so... revolutionary... it's like being back in the early 90s before the internet took of... like buying shares in google, apple or facebook before mainstream adoption... I can't stomach staying out of this, bitcoin is my wildest fantasy coming true... this is why I am the careful type and hold 100% BTC  Smiley

It's better losing some fiat (temporary) than to end up with sellers remorse.

This!



556. Post 2362231 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.01h):

Quote from: molecular on June 03, 2013, 09:21:27 PM
Looking at past action, you would always do well to hold (unless you can call those tops and bottoms like a pro - but do you want to get caught with your pants down considering what we are talking about with BTC?)

Interesting...
If really you want to be the careful type, shouldn't you wait on the sideline with your fiat ready, as price has a tendency to fall faster than going up?


not at this stage. we're still in the investment phase. bitcoins value is being bootstrapped, you want to hold on to what you got. Missing the train is just too expensive.

next up: while exchanges and other "bitcoin businesses" run into increasingly unbearable regulatory issues, the global shadow economy discovers bitcoin (international tade, illicit trade).


I'm feeling you. Bitcoin may not solve all the problems of the people, but it solves a few very real and very important problems the people has.

It's taking the power off the hands of those who control monetary supply and hence rule the world de facto.

It has such a huge potential tu subvert the status quo. And it's neutral.

Math is the language of nature, and one of its purest expressions is this piece of revolutionary Genius we call Bitcoin.



557. Post 2372517 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on June 04, 2013, 03:51:57 PM


Aaaaammmeeerrriiicaaaaa!

JEEEEEEZ, MAN.

I thought that was MtGox. And I have quite a significant amount of fiat being withdrew through them ATM.

Don't play this games in here my friend, my heart can fail at any moment Cheesy




558. Post 2372523 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

BTW, this is what "underweb" (LOL) criminals think about Bitcoin:

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/05/underweb-payments-post-liberty-reserve/

As expected, they do not like it. We are still too small. Too volatile. They like dollars.




FOR NOW




559. Post 2372589 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on June 04, 2013, 09:17:34 PM
i am back after 14 day ban Smiley  Grin

i promise i will behave good this time Smiley

man, didn't you lose your underwear shorting bitcoin with 1:4 leverage??



560. Post 2372598 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: fourkey2001 on May 14, 2013, 11:32:07 PM
You'll see sub 100 in the next couple hours or so.  Maybe less.  Especially as people who don't sit and watch this forum or the markets get home and realize they are losing big $$$ and are caught in a firestorm.  I feel bad for those who aren't aware yet and have limit orders setup.   Cry  

Do you think it will go that far in the absence of additional news tonight? I was thinking steam would run out around the 105 walls at best in the absence of any additional multi-thousand BTC sell offs.

Yes I do, speculating of course...I think you're only going to see this panic sell gain momentum.  Those walls are going to come right down.  There's really no way to know where the bottom is and when the CNN's and others start running the story, there's just no way to know where this thing will stop.  I still believe the core of Bitcoin is around the $50 or $60 mark, if it's any consolation.  Retesting the lows was expected and if they breakthrough that...it's a whole new ballgame.  All bets are off.

Finally some one who talks sense!

Good job coinseeker

quoted for the lulz



561. Post 2372661 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: rebuilder on June 04, 2013, 09:23:19 PM
BTW, this is what "underweb" (LOL) criminals think about Bitcoin:

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/05/underweb-payments-post-liberty-reserve/

As expected, they do not like it. We are still too small. Too volatile. They like dollars.




FOR NOW



So all the news articles pointing out Bitcoin's widespread criminal use have been wrong? I'm shocked.

Well, you need to believe in Bitcoin to use it ATM, and that's why the "I missed the early adopter train" song is bullshit. Everybody entering into BTC now is still an early adopter.

We are in a very early phase. Bitcoin market is still so tiny that it's not useful for those thinking in fiat terms. It's still too volatile. As I said many times, Dread Pirate Roberts (Silk Road's admin) is a visionary, but 99% of criminals want to transact their favorite currency - the US dollar.



562. Post 2372730 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 04, 2013, 09:36:18 PM
Very true. Prepare to be called 'lucky' in future years by people with less vision or too tiny balls.

There is a part of luck in all this.

Question is, will you call yourself "unlucky" if Bitcoin crashes and burns?

No. Always grateful to be part of this game-changing, revolutionary experiment. Hold tight, grow up a pair of balls, and enjoy the ride Wink



563. Post 2373132 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

HEY, WTF???

No spoiler alert? I'm in Stockholm now, I did not have the chance to see the last Game Of Thrones chapter... And now you spoil it in the Wall Observer thread???

JEEEEEEEEEEZ, MAN




564. Post 2378725 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

I have to say that after the April, 10th crash I placed big bids around $30. Without much analysis, I strongly believed that the post-crash bottom was going to be around $30, which is the 2011 bubble top.

For that to happen I was expecting a 2011 situation in terms of negative news coverage, "this is a ponzi" screaming, etc.

After we rebounded at $50 with two consecutives all time highs in terms of daily volume, I changed my mind. I realized there are many differences compared to 2011. After the last bubble, people thought Bitcoin was dead. News coverage was extremely negative. There were posts on these forums saying Bitcoin was a huge ponzi, with Satoshi as its very own Maddoff.

Things are very different now. I really believe we won't go below $50 unless there are some very bad news. Thus, even if $25-$30 coins didn't seem crazy to me after April, 10th, I now believe it's only a wet dream of those willing to increase their BTC stash - regardless of what TA says.



565. Post 2379703 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: oda.krell on June 05, 2013, 03:12:29 PM
Correction to my own post above:

30 USD is (probably, I didn't calculate it myself) the result of linear regression and, as I understood sarc, removing some outlier data (i.e. the bubbles).

The other charts I've seen that use the entire data have as at around 50 USD, IIRC.

That is pretty much consistent with EW analysis, isn't it? I mean, the bottom of wave 4 (bottom post-2013 crash) is aprox. the top of wave 1 (2011 bubble high), isn't it?



As I said earlier I arrived to the same conclusion using my very own "common sense" and analysis after April, 10th - but now I believe I was mistaken.



566. Post 2379781 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on June 05, 2013, 03:23:18 PM
I thought this thread was about wall watching, not in-depth conversations about technical analysis.  But maybe that was just me...  

The beauty of this thread is that we make with it what we want. And we enjoy it. If you don't like it, that's why there is an ignore button. Just ignore the users who are not posting about "wall watching", and you are all set.



567. Post 2379974 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on June 05, 2013, 03:43:13 PM
Eventually everyone learns that they are pretty meaningless  Grin
True. It's good to have an idea why they're meaningless though.

It's really just about organizing the conversations in different threads so we don't have to wade through tangents to find what we came here for...

But if you don't mind tangents, perhaps I can tell you about our lord and savior, Jesus?

I see you are a noob. This thread has always been a whorehouse about gut feelings, FUD spreading, funny GIFs (who is not a hardcore fan of TheKoziTwo?), and sometimes a little TA and some commentary on walls (which are nowhere to be seen lately, BTW).

That's what this thread is about - and it has always been.

If you want a thread about ONLY wall commenting, please go ahead and start your very own self-moderated topic.



568. Post 2380576 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: sammel on June 05, 2013, 04:46:42 PM
so is it going up or down?!

 Huh

sidewayz



569. Post 2380644 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on June 05, 2013, 04:50:35 PM
so is it going up or down?!

 Huh

sidewayz

Up, it's been undervalued for weeks now.
Bitcoin does whatever the fuck it wants.


TheKoziTwo, you are an artists: funny gifs, songs... Did I tell you I'm your fan? Wink



570. Post 2380690 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):




571. Post 2380696 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Cheesy

Just kidding, of course Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



572. Post 2380705 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: MickeyT2008 on June 05, 2013, 04:56:58 PM
It seems to be working now but no trading on Clark Moody, Bitcoinwisdom or Bitcoinity

Yeah, 7m lag



573. Post 2380802 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Gox down for me



574. Post 2380825 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 05, 2013, 05:10:05 PM
Gox down for me

Same here.

It looks like it's been down for everybody for the last 5 minutes.

Hope they can pull their shit together.



575. Post 2388161 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Just FYI: all the "MtGox withdrawal delays" are FUD. Requested two reasonably big EUR withdrawals on Monday and Tuesday, and received both today (SEPA transfer).

I was ready to wait "up to 3 weeks", but it turned out 3 days. Kudos to Magical Tux.



576. Post 2392933 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: rezurect on June 06, 2013, 07:01:27 PM
Test of 115 coming, i guess.

About time. I was waiting it since Monday. I expect testing $105ish, if that is broken $80ish, and if that is broken too, $50ish. Really don't know how low we will ago, but I'm pretty sure no lower than $50. And from there, the only way is UP.




577. Post 2394505 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

I agree on the fact that the stability we had during the last days is very bullish. After a parabolic growth period that looked and felt like a huge bubble exposed to the eyes of the whole world, BTC is trading at almost x10 the price we had in January ($14). I still can't help thinking that what we had prior April 10th looked indeed like a bubble, but the truth is the price is not reflecting that, the price says we just had a correction during a very significant growth trend.

Bubble followed by slow bear market decline is still a possibility, but every day trading on this range is one point more for the "correction" case, and a point less for the "bubble burst" case.

This time, the train will live the station (again) rather sooner than later.

As I've been repeating since the week after the crash, this is no 2011.



578. Post 2394625 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 06, 2013, 09:41:27 PM
I don't see it like that, at all.

The longer it takes before we start going up again, the more bearish I become.

Do you really think not going lower than $50 is bearish?

In my book, everything above $30ish is bullish, considering the BTC price just a few months ago - and I don't see it going as low as $30ish.

Probably I'm looking at it with the eyes of an investor and not those of a day trader, but remember that all growth is preceeded by stability.




579. Post 2394868 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 06, 2013, 09:55:49 PM
Sure it's bearish.

Unless you're trying to tell that a short term drop of 50% is inconsequent.

I'm telling that after such insane growth a deep correction is needed. Infrastructure is not good enough to support that kind of growth. There are things that have to be built, step by step to reach broader usage and thus new levels of growth.

Therefore, cheaper coins than $120 are expected. But in the big picture things are happening for Bitcoin, CEOs are looking at it, the business world is extremely curious about it. Bitcoin entrepreneurs as Bitpay's CEO go to extremely relevant business gatherings (Leweb 13 London, today, for example) and their talks are the most crowded ones.

Bitcoin will grow, year after year, but this has to be a longish game for a real win. And important things need to happen.

We're headed in the right direction.



580. Post 2394927 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on June 06, 2013, 10:10:29 PM
True. However, if bitcoin is going to have wider adoption, the price has to go up to accommodate a larger slice of world economy.

The price of Bitcoin is largely irrelevant to economic activity. XRP for instance has a theoretical market cap several times that of Bitcoin, yet nobody really uses ripple right now.

How does a currency provides the nuts and bolts for an economy that has a value flow larger than it?

It isn't flowing, that's kind of my point. As long as the currency sits in every bodies wallets as a "store of value" and so few people are using it as a payment system the discrepancy between the theoretical market cap (all currency times the price) becomes so large that the effect of real economic activity is basically nil.

Agreed ... if the velocity of Bitcoin 'money' could increase (ie more liquidity on the exchanges), the price would not need to rise to accommodate increased trade, but as most of it is locked away, as an instrument of exchange it is well, not the best right now. People want to hold their coins til they are worth thousands so that the very small free float could then accommodate the needs of an economy.

 I am not convinced that it will work like that. At the moment we are like a penny stock in which the original owners have sold about 5% of company. Its a speculative investment, not a currency, yet many are calling it the currency of the future. I am not denying that there is much more to the blockchain, just looking at BTC as a currency here and now. It is so illiquid that it will not attract any serious players right now. I imagine that there are some medium sized fish who got hooked during the high volume period that right now simply so not know what to do. They cannot liquidate their investment without dramatically moving the price and they can't use it for anything either (on the scale we are talking). Not what it said on the tin. Not crying for them ... they are all big boys.

Big fish need much more liquidity than this market is currently willing to provide. They don't like 'trades' they cannot exit from. Like it or not, there will always be more than one 'currency' ... the ability to switch between them, whatever they are, is key to adoption.

I am not an economist so please do not pick this argument to pieces on academic grounds ... it is just my slightly educated opinion, and I am sure there are many holes. And this is neither a bullish nor bearish post, just some thoughts.


TL;DR: Bitcoin market is a peanut so small that it's like a joke.

I agree Wink

Did you know that "MtGox" controlled almost 80% of the market not long ago? Cheesy

Infrastructure has to grow A LOT. But the Bitcoin concept is so fascinating that a lot of people is putting a lot of work on it, and more clever people is getting hooked to it.



581. Post 2395031 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 06, 2013, 10:18:27 PM
Ok, so you're short term bearish.

Yeah. Didn't you read that I sold some coins at $118ish on Monday because I needed to cash out fiat and I thought it was going to go lower?

Selling at the bottom, like a boss Smiley

And i have some fiat of friends who asked me to buy BTC for them whenever I thought I should, and I'm still holding their fiat, expecting a better entry point.



582. Post 2395125 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: lebing on June 06, 2013, 10:35:18 PM
All that needs to happen for the price to start rocketing again is for the big VCs to back a fully-registered, convenient-to-use, stable and secure exchange, eliminating all uncertainty from the market.  Is that so far out of the question?
Every major down-spike in the last few weeks has been due to the government or MtGox doing something wrong, but with all the VC money flowing in, things are going to get better.

I can't wait to see what Bitcoin looks like on New Year's Day 2014 Smiley

The last two 10% drops were not related to any news event.  ...also, there is no VC that is going to put significant amounts of cash into something that is so heavily influenced by illegal activity.  At the moment, the Bitcoin economy is still used 90% for Silk Road purchases.

Tell that to Chamath P and Fred Wilson.

This.

The Silk Road talk is so '2011ish. Came on. People sees that there's much more in BTC, besides of the fact that real economy is still reduced and that it's very speculation driven.

This baby needs to grow a little bit, but it's unstoppable.



583. Post 2395332 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 06, 2013, 10:46:31 PM

The Silk Road talk is so '2011ish. Came on. People sees that there's much more in BTC, besides of the fact that real economy is still reduced and that it's very speculation driven.

This baby needs to grow a little bit, but it's unstoppable.

The question is why the f--k would I want to internationally transfer my money to Japan, wait 4 days, pay transfer fees, buy one bitcoin and then buy a service I could pay for instantly with paypal? The only reason to go through hassle of getting bitcoin is using silkroad. Please tell me, why else would I want to use bitcoin to buy something over using credit card or paypal.

It is a serious question, I expect a thought out answer.

Seriously?

You are very mistaken if you think that Bitcoin is a micropayment network headed to compete with PayPal.

Bitcoin is not about that. It's about storing value in a decentralized, cash-like and trust-free way. It's the "decentralized, pseudo anonymous, gold-like cash of the Internet"

If you do not see the potential and the demand for that, think again.



584. Post 2395459 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

About time!



585. Post 2398781 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on June 07, 2013, 03:39:41 AM
Given the current stability, I'm hesitant to characterize this as a 2011 burst rather than a late 2012-type correction.

Also the 2011 bubble inflated much higher, much faster, for much less reason. This time there was a lot of reason for a decent rise, and it rose less and slower. It just makes sense that it would fall less far in the aftermath.

And everything happening post-crash is extremely positive. On the contrary, everything that happened post-2011 crash was negative.



586. Post 2399303 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Miz4r on June 07, 2013, 08:27:23 AM
I wonder where all the fiat goes.. after so many  dumps the last weeks..      is it sitting there..?
is it moved way.. ?

Some of it will move away to pay bills, buy a new car, whatever. And some will stay and wait to buy back in cheaper.

And some other went to buy ASICs. You know, when you buy one Jalapeńo is OK to pay with BTC. But when you make a significant buy as a company, you need an invoice and you need to justify the amount on the invoice with a bank transfer of the very same amount.

There's still no way to do this with Bitcoin.



587. Post 2399881 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Great! If you want the price to go up from here just quickly send me +100BTC for me to immediately dump them, you will see how the market immediately rebounds up - it never fails!

LOL Cheesy



588. Post 2399978 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 07, 2013, 10:30:14 AM
Great! If you want the price to go up from here just quickly send me +100BTC for me to immediately dump them, you will see how the market immediately rebounds up - it never fails!

LOL Cheesy

I take it you are extremely happy at the moment? And you are buying tons of cheap coins?

No, still not buying. I will buy some at $80ish and a whole lot more at $50ish.

If we don't reach $80ish and $50ish, I will be happy nevertheless - because I'm heavily invested. If we reach those two points, I will be also happy because I will be able to significantly increase my stash.

If we go below $50ish, I will be surprised and worried for mid-term. But I don't think we'll go below $50.



589. Post 2400004 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Why every time we have a crash I hear in my head the song that goes:

"how deep is your love.... la la la la, la la la"

Cheesy Cheesy



590. Post 2400025 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: favelle75 on June 07, 2013, 10:45:08 AM
I cashed out at $142...the question now is, when to buy back in?

I never place bids in a single spot.

I place them just above different support points, and the bids get bigger to each step down (for example: $1 bid at $84.3; a $2 bid at $71.34; a $5 bid at $51.75, etc.)



591. Post 2400077 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: sarc on June 07, 2013, 10:54:10 AM
I wonder how many people's coins are confirming there way to Gox right now?

You can bet that quite a few:




592. Post 2400304 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 11:09:12 AM
Btw , the hasrate has dropped by 14k today  Huh

http://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

That's just variance.




593. Post 2400815 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on June 07, 2013, 12:26:11 PM
Once again, there wasn't an overwhelming buying force.

Sellers just stopped selling.  Lips sealed

And buyers stopped buying...

There's no buying pressure at all. Price is driven by sellers at the moment... Which is one of the very characteristics of a bear market, perhaps?

Buyers stopped buying a while ago. The downward movement we had on Sunday and the one we had today stopped only because sellers stopped to sell, not because buyers started to buy.



594. Post 2400991 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on June 07, 2013, 12:47:48 PM
When the bubble burst earlier this year, over 2 million BTC were dumped on MtGox alone.  It this latest down trend, we've only sold ~150 BTC.  Once the big whales realize we are on a persistent downturn, the selling is going to snowball, and another 1.5 million BTC are going to be on the chopping block...

Just to give you an understanding of what that's going to do to the price...  there are only 250K BTC on the order book right now.  Now, don't get me wrong, there's lots of money on the sidelines, but think about what that means...  It means that big BTC whales are currently UNABLE to cash out.  So they are bleeding into the market slowly to try and keep the price from crashing.  ...and that's why this downturn is going to be so long and so painful...

I really don't know where are you getting your figures. On Gox's order book there are slightly less than 120k BTC ATM. All time high in terms of BTC at Gox order book is slightly over 300k BTC, and that happened end of August 2012.

So, even if it was true that we had 250k BTC on Gox order book now (which it isn't), you shouldn't say "only", because 250k BTC on sale on Gox would bex a HUGE quantity, very close to ATH. Just remember that there are only 11M BTC circulating, when you have 2,3% of the total supply of BTC on sale on a single exchange you do not say "only", and you do not expect more to come.

And BTW, BTC whales are not "currently" unable to cash out. That's BS. Cashing out many k's of BTC has always been a problem, and today is a much smaller problem that it was let's say in January. This is a super tiny market, it has always been, and cashing out k's of BTC avoiding massive slippage has always been a lengthy process - in the past more than in the present.



595. Post 2401209 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on June 07, 2013, 01:09:23 PM
When the bubble burst earlier this year, over 2 million BTC were dumped on MtGox alone.  It this latest down trend, we've only sold ~150 BTC.  Once the big whales realize we are on a persistent downturn, the selling is going to snowball, and another 1.5 million BTC are going to be on the chopping block...

Just to give you an understanding of what that's going to do to the price...  there are only 250K BTC on the order book right now.  Now, don't get me wrong, there's lots of money on the sidelines, but think about what that means...  It means that big BTC whales are currently UNABLE to cash out.  So they are bleeding into the market slowly to try and keep the price from crashing.  ...and that's why this downturn is going to be so long and so painful...

I really don't know where are you getting your figures. On Gox's order book there are slightly less than 120k BTC ATM. All time high in terms of BTC at Gox order book is slightly over 300k BTC, and that happened end of August 2012.

So, even if it was true that we had 250k BTC on Gox order book now (which it isn't), you shouldn't say "only", because 250k BTC on sale on Gox would bex a HUGE quantity, very close to ATH. Just remember that there are only 11M BTC circulating, when you have 2,3% of the total supply of BTC on sale on a single exchange you do not say "only", and you do not expect more to come.

And BTW, BTC whales are not "currently" unable to cash out. That's BS. Cashing out many k's of BTC has always been a problem, and today is a much smaller problem that it was let's say in January. This is a super tiny market, it has always been, and cashing out k's of BTC avoiding massive slippage has always been a lengthy process - in the past more than in the present.

250K on Clarkmoody right now if you group by BTC0.1 and look all the way to $11.   My contention is that since there is so much less volume on the exchange now (due to the cash inflow/outflow conduits being closed), then selling large amounts is much much harder.  In any case, the whales make one story very clear - the vast majority of BTC is not in the Bitcoin economy, it is in the hands of speculators, and those people will dump when they see a persistent downturn.  Initially they will try to control the price to maximize their exit return, but ultimately they will trip over each other selling their BTC, and we will be right back where we started this year...

You are reading it wrong. To be very precise in this second there are 120,86k coins in Gox's order book (it may have changed significantly by the time you read this post). If you want to see a graphic representation, see the graph below. You will see that indicates slightly more (around 125k), because quantity on the order book changes pretty fast.




596. Post 2401626 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on June 07, 2013, 02:11:00 PM
I wonder which month of 2011 we are in?

We are not in 2011.



597. Post 2402428 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

And.... Here..... We...... Go......




598. Post 2402743 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):




599. Post 2402766 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Guys, I wanted to make you a favour... So I sold a little coins at $108.5... Just because I wanted the price to rebound UP, I know you feel bad when our beloved BTC crashes

Cheesy

EDIT: you have to know my story first... I'm pretty good buying at the bottom (most of my bids are filled just before the price rebounds UP UP UP), but I'm terrible selling low (50% of the times I sell coins, it's at the very bottom... It happened to me when we touched $79 and happened again on Monday when I sold at $118ish and then price rebounded to $122ish.... Lucky me I only sell "play coins", the vast majority of my stash is in cold storage for good).

So, hopefully my stunt works, and $108.5 was the bottom for today. Placed bids with the fiat I got for that coins all the way till $91ish, let's see how it works out this time Wink



600. Post 2402848 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Man, it's cold in here, let's heat this room a bit...




601. Post 2402890 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Dumping for good...



And time to "paint walls"...




602. Post 2403007 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Testing $105ish today? I think as soon as we touch it we will go through it like a hot knife through butter.

Next level to be tested will be $90ish, and next REAL support $80ish. Anyhow, as Oda said earlier I think testing $80 won't happen too soon. But honestly, I think the sooner the better. I wouldn't mind at all going rapidly to $50 and double bottoming it hard, with big volume. That would mean that the only way is UP, slowly, but UP. IMO that's the best case scenario for the bulls. Breaking ATH during this year is not happening IMO. And a rally to $165 won't happen any soon neither.



603. Post 2403250 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 04:33:22 PM
Testing $105ish today? I think as soon as we touch it we will go through it like a hot knife through butter.

Next level to be tested will be $90ish, and next REAL support $80ish. Anyhow, as Oda said earlier I think testing $80 won't happen too soon. But honestly, I think the sooner the better. I wouldn't mind at all going rapidly to $50 and double bottoming it hard, with big volume. That would mean that the only way is UP, slowly, but UP. IMO that's the best case scenario for the bulls. Breaking ATH during this year is not happening IMO. And a rally to $165 won't happen any soon neither.

xseeee ME...but ... the best scenario for a bull is a price drop?   Smiley
yeah , I know i'm reading between lines but still , was funny

For a realistic long-term bull with his feet on the ground (like most of us here) it's indeed the best case scenario, considering we had PARABOLIC growth (=bubble) a few weeks ago.

For a "rptard style" delusional bull short on meds expecting $300k per BTC by the end of the year, I guess "best case scenarˇo" is TO THE MOON and nothing else Wink



604. Post 2403259 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 07, 2013, 04:43:54 PM
everyone is so pessimistic today... you know what to do  Grin


YES. Selling at the bottom so the price goes UP UP UP from there!

Cheesy



605. Post 2403279 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: samson on June 07, 2013, 04:55:09 PM
Testing $105ish today? I think as soon as we touch it we will go through it like a hot knife through butter.

Next level to be tested will be $90ish, and next REAL support $80ish. Anyhow, as Oda said earlier I think testing $80 won't happen too soon. But honestly, I think the sooner the better. I wouldn't mind at all going rapidly to $50 and double bottoming it hard, with big volume. That would mean that the only way is UP, slowly, but UP. IMO that's the best case scenario for the bulls. Breaking ATH during this year is not happening IMO. And a rally to $165 won't happen any soon neither.

xseeee ME...but ... the best scenario for a bull is a price drop?   Smiley
yeah , I know i'm reading between lines but still , was funny

For a realistic long-term bull with his feet on the ground (like most of us here) it's indeed the best case scenario, considering we had PARABOLIC growth (=bubble) a few weeks ago.

For a "rptard style" delusional bull short on meds expecting $300k per BTC by the end of the year, I guess "best case scenarˇo" is TO THE MOON and nothing else Wink

Whatever happened to that rptard guy, did they let him out of the 'secure unit' yet ?

I guess they locked him in for good, and they threw the keys of his nut-cell to the toilet, and flushed it a couple of times.

Well, we saw it coming Sad



606. Post 2403321 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

$13M in Gox's order book. Well, it's official. That's the lowest amount we had post-bubble.




607. Post 2403368 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: samson on June 07, 2013, 05:04:38 PM
I guess they locked him in for good, and they threw the keys of his nut-cell to the toilet, and flushed it a couple of times.

Well, we saw it coming Sad

Looking on the bright side of things he's probably saving a bunch of cash on expensive hotels.

That made me LOL. Hard.

I'm feeling bad now Sad



608. Post 2403457 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: etaty on June 07, 2013, 05:10:10 PM
1 ... 2 ... 3 go

rally up

 Grin

ok not now, but when ?

Depends on what kind of rally you expect. Bull traps, soon enough. Rally up to $165 and then the sky is the limit? Not this year I'd say. But hey, aren't we all in this for the long run?

Just enjoy the cheap coins, thousands feel better than hundreds, and you will enjoy them during the next hype cycle, which will happen sooner or later, unless Bitcoin is replaced/destroyed.



609. Post 2403793 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 07, 2013, 05:41:41 PM
i have a filling my bids not getting filled this time, oh well back to work...

don't worry once enough support builds up we are going to see dumps.






610. Post 2404538 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Rampion on June 07, 2013, 04:11:33 PM
Guys, I wanted to make you a favour... So I sold a little coins at $108.5... Just because I wanted the price to rebound UP, I know you feel bad when our beloved BTC crashes

It's working... It's working.... IT'S WORKING!!!!

Yeah. Like a boss.



611. Post 2404930 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 07, 2013, 07:31:08 PM
Testing $105ish today? I think as soon as we touch it we will go through it like a hot knife through butter.

Next level to be tested will be $90ish, and next REAL support $80ish. Anyhow, as Oda said earlier I think testing $80 won't happen too soon. But honestly, I think the sooner the better. I wouldn't mind at all going rapidly to $50 and double bottoming it hard, with big volume. That would mean that the only way is UP, slowly, but UP. IMO that's the best case scenario for the bulls. Breaking ATH during this year is not happening IMO. And a rally to $165 won't happen any soon neither.

I enjoy reading your posts Rampion. You were talking about this the other day and I think I was split. There is a part of me that just doesn't want to trade out of something I believe in. Do you know what I mean?
But on the other hand, I'm thinking "Hey, maybe I can get more of what I believe in". And then there is the Angel over my shoulder saying "Don't be greedy, if BTC is successful, you will only need one."  Smiley

But realistically, I feel we go lower. The unknown variable is some good news coming out when we least expect it. If that happens on a down move after exiting a position, it creates a... headache. ehehehhe
I guess then, what you did, selling a smaller percentage (20% was it?) is reasonable. I'm debating that now...

And how about Coinseeker? Man, I really think it is two alter egos. Right now he is down. I don't know what to say. eheeheh
Not talking smack bro, just enjoying the diversity of the forum. We are sort of a soap opera here.

Anyway, I promise you this, if we do go substantially lower, say the 50 Euro level (no, not dollar level, there I would be taking loans out ;-), I will try to save every penny I can and buy more BTC... Because I believe in it...

I feel you. I usually do not sell coins, just buy more at dips. Sometime I sell a little "play money", like I did today at $108.5.

Obviously it would have felt GREAT to triple my coins during the crash from $266 to $50 and then back to $165. But honestly, I just holded what I had and bought more. I had a lot of bids filled (but I missed the biggest one which I pleaced at 39€ish), and I was lucky that I had a nice amount of fiat at the exchange. Catching the top is difficult for me, ad it's just that I cannot stand when I sell coins and I have to buy back at a loss. During the crash to $80ish I lost like 15BTC because I was temporarily blinded by greed... And I was reassured once again of what I already know, that I'm an investor and not a trader, that I do not like to sell coins, and I follow price just because I like to buy at the lowest price possible so my "average entry point" is way below the spot price.

Hope this made sense Wink



612. Post 2404954 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 07, 2013, 07:38:52 PM
I'm still wondering what the 7.5k btc buy at 1pm CET was all about. I didn't see it when it took place, but I'm pretty sure it was one big order.

Why would a whale buy right into the downtrend? He had a slippage alone of 3 or 4 USD. And why not wait a few hours longer and buy even cheaper.

It's too much volume to be a stabilizing move, in my opinion, but it doesn't make much sense otherwise. I'm puzzled.

If you really believe in BTC, perhaps a few dollars (or many) here and there doesn't really matter. When you see an opportunity to pick up a few (7.5k - I'm about 7.499 jealous) you do it.
I'm holding for the future, so I can imagine a guy with money, just buys it and says "I'll check again in 5 years."

Yeah. I'm in for the long haul. I'm quite happy with the amount of BTC I have, and I buy a little more with my spare cash. I don't have any intention of "cashing out" soon.

The truth is that I really believe that "you simply do not cash out from BTC". I would like to "cash out" from fiat. Yeah, I know - that's wishful thinking. But I guarantee I value much more the coins that the $, even if I need the $ to eat.

Call me crazy.



613. Post 2405058 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.02h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 07:54:22 PM
Do I have to remind you guys that keeping coins and not spending them means you're killing it as a currency?

But , again everbody is free to believe one day he's gonna be rich from bitcoins.
Glad I don't have this problem  Tongue Tongue

And BTW, i spend them too. And I donate to BTC  causes too. It's just that my stash tends to increase instead of decreasing, is that bad in your opinion?



614. Post 2407036 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 08:42:53 PM
Do I have to remind you guys that keeping coins and not spending them means you're killing it as a currency?


Yes, that is true in Paul Krugman's socialist keynesian wet dream.

In the real world we call it "using buzzwords (like 'hoarders') to demonize responsible saving."

Nobody ever has any legit data to back up their assumption that there is this huge number of people who hoard BTCs and never spend them. Although if you look at tx volume, you'd easily see that the ratio of spent coins to hoarded coins is much higher than with the USD OR precious metals. The second we say "Oh, but I do spend my coins" the 'anti-hoarder' crowd backs off - "Oh, well that's ok, you're a spender, you're benefiting the currency."
So what is the magical ratio of spend to saved coins you must reach before being considered a hoarder, and how can we empirically justify this ratio? No one has ever answered me this question, and I ask it every single time someone demonizes saving by implying that it "kills bitcoin."

People hoarded gold and silver and they were used as currencies for millenia. Thousands of years. Go read Fekete's papers on monetary theory you will shit your pants when you read what he has to say about hoarding  Shocked

I use a toilet for that... u know... toilet!!!!!!

I know pretty well I stirred a bitbee nest by saying that but don't forget.
Greed will destroy every dream no matter how beautifull it is  , and currently bitcoin is driven by greed.

Unlike many others on forum , I haven't put all my hopes of a wealthy future in bitcoins succes, and thus I can keep a cooler head than most people here.




Yeah. Greed is a problem. Money and greed go together. Those are deep problems. Even deeper than Bitcoin. BTC is not designed to solve all the problems. But it solves very real, day-by-day problems,and even if it's not definitive, it's a step towards freedom.





615. Post 2407112 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 07, 2013, 11:33:07 PM

Dude, stop the Keynesian "deflationary currency leads to hoarding and hoarding is bad"-crap. People buy things, because they both want and need things. You cannot delay a purchase forever (post-mortem anyone?) so the fact that the underlying currency gains in value isn't going to stop economic traffic in the least *.

*Although in the beginning people might need to get used to this, but it will be temporary. People will need to get used that merely holding currency isn't voluntarily paying more taxes and that saving can actually be a good thing as opposed to the credit hungry society the west is these days. I don't have any debt, but I can assure you I'm a vast minority ....

Keynesians are like cockroaches Tongue

Let me explain why I feel hoarding is bad , and not because of this keynesian b*** which i don't give a crap about.

Worst case scenario
We have people accumulating bitcoins , people not using bitcoins , price skyrocketing because bitcoin is such a great idea, and there are fewer and fewer bitcoins (people are stashing them)  until , some moroon realizes

Why the f*** is a bitcoin so pricey when you can't do anything with it.

You know what happens next. And this won't be a bubble burst.It's going a total bearpocalypse.

BTC is not about fast freeish transactions. It's about preserving and being able to freely transfer value, in a 100% decentralized and trust-free scenario. It enables you to completely control your wealth. I don't know if you understand the implications of this. And "saving" value is not necessarily inferior to "burning" value consuming just because money tends to be more valuable *NOW* than *TORROW*.

And, if the above alone was not enough, Bitcoin is also a way to scream *fuck off* at the face of a bunch of nasty gusty.



616. Post 2407300 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on June 08, 2013, 12:59:11 AM
Guys, you realize there's every other subforums for this kind of discussion, right?



Your gifs are funny, but your reasoning is so retarded that I'm forced to think you're trolling.

Let me ask you a very simple question: don't you realize that debt money is bad money?

You already have LOTS of it. You already have a "global currency": debt. I really don't know what you're babbling about when you start with your "Ripple superior to BTC" song.

Honestly, are you serious?



617. Post 2407311 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 08, 2013, 12:50:49 AM
Guys, you realize there's every other subforums for this kind of discussion, right?

Come on baby, now let us know if the price will go UP, or DOWN.

Let me guess.... Down?

Wink



618. Post 2407474 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on June 08, 2013, 01:19:55 AM
Guys, you realize there's every other subforums for this kind of discussion, right?


Your gifs are funny, but your reasoning is so retarded that I'm forced to think you're trolling.

Let me ask you a very simple question: don't you realize that debt money is bad money?

You already have LOTS of it. You already have a "global currency": debt. I really don't know what you're babbling about when you start with your "Ripple superior to BTC" song.

Honestly, are you serious?

I'm aware you don't know what I'm "babbling" about, as it relates to Ripple, because you don't understand Ripple.  You're prejudiced against anything not Bitcoin, thus remain ignorant to what Ripple really is.  Truly, Ripple is not a Bitcoin competitor or replacement.  It could become that, but that is the choice of the people.  That is not what Ripple is for.  Ripple could actually make Bitcoin more accessible to more people and businesses, without more people or more business actually having to deal directly in Bitcoin.  It's a win, win for Bitcoin.  Sure beats begging businesses to accept Bitcoin in numerous forum threads.   Roll Eyes

How your "debt" point is even relevant, I'm still trying to figure that out.

First, your "100 billion is superior to 21 millions" is ridiculous, as others pointed out.

Secondly, Bitcoin is designed to replace a flawed, centralized system, based on debt money created from thin air. It's a challenge to factual powers.
Ripple is just a distributed layer built on top of this flawed system, and shares all its drawbacks - adding an additional layer of debt-driven negative incentives. Plus, the crypto built inside Ripple is 100% centralized, while its security mechanism (no mining, consensus, no incentives to be a validator) is 100% untested.

And finally, you really do not understand the deep implications of Bitcoin. How it represents a step towards freedom, because it can free you from debt money. You seem not to value that, probably because you cannot understand it. You are too happy to be a slave. Or you are troll. No other options.



619. Post 2407570 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on June 08, 2013, 01:47:47 AM
I'm not going to turn this into a Ripple discussion.  That wasn't my intention.  It's actually a brilliant system though, if you take the time to understand.  It's everything Bitcoin could have been and never will be.  That's MY view.




620. Post 2407689 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 08, 2013, 01:59:41 AM
I'm not going to turn this into a Ripple discussion.  That wasn't my intention.  It's actually a brilliant system though, if you take the time to understand.  It's everything Bitcoin could have been and never will be.  That's MY view.



But he IS right in saying that bitcoin will never be used for microtransactions.

Obviously. For microtransactions you have paypal. VISA. Or another crypt. Actually BTC cap is 7 transactions per second. VISA is +2000 per second.

BTC was never intended as a microtransactions system. And BTC could never have been Ripple, because is antagonic to debt-based, created-out-of-thin-air money.

BTC's point is a completely different one. It's more about freedom than about convenience.

I guess you need to read more and educate yourself, because you are not getting BTC's point if you think that not being ideal for fast micro-transactions is a flaw. Again: it was not designed with that in mind. The problems it solves are different, and deeper.



621. Post 2407753 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on June 08, 2013, 02:20:52 AM

BTC's point is a completely different one. It's more about freedom than about convenience.

I guess you need to read more and educate yourself, because you are not getting BTC's point if you think that not being ideal for fast micro-transactions is a flaw. Again: it was not designed with that in mind. The problems it solves are different, and deeper.

And it's failing at that. 

Yep. Sure. Started from scratch as a piece of code in 2009 and here we are, looking how all the three letter agencies stare at it. Even Coinseeker the patriot is hooked in the bitcointalk forums chatting with bitcoiners terrorists, because it is such a failure.

BTW, today I sent money BTC to one of my best friends who recently moved to a South American country. He cannot easily send money out of where he's currently living, nor receiving money from abroad, because he just opened a bank account and he has not been working in the country for at least 3 months, so international wires are "disabled". Funny regulation, right?. Well, we just said *fuck off* to that, only two hours ago. True story. But yeah, what a failure.

Saying that what is happening with Bitcoin now "is a failure" defines yourself.



622. Post 2407784 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 08, 2013, 02:25:58 AM

I guess you need to read more and educate yourself, because you are not getting BTC's point if you think that not being ideal for fast micro-transactions is a flaw. Again: it was not designed with that in mind. The problems it solves are different, and deeper.

But this will stop it from being used as a currency. It will be store of value, but not currency in a sense "pay for dinner" or "buy a coffee" currency. Of course you CAN buy a dinner in few obscure places that I do not know names of in LA paying with BTC, but that's not the point.

I appreciate BTC benefits. Being decentralised is fantastic. Having a paper wallet is mind blowing. Its compressing value into a QR code. This stuff is truly, truly amazing to me. But I cringe when I hear that BTC will become a widely adopted currency.

Services can be built on top of Bitcoin that can allow you to instant off-chain transactions. And anyhow, not being able to pay your morning coffee with Bitcoin is irrelevant. 90% of the people in here agrees that there is no need to be able to pay for your chewing gum with it. You don't need it to be the "world currency" used by 5 billion people, and with a price per bitcoin of $1M. BTC covers a specific area that generates a huge demand, simply because it enables you to be more free than you were without it.

And now call it a failure...



623. Post 2407821 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on June 08, 2013, 02:35:55 AM

BTC's point is a completely different one. It's more about freedom than about convenience.

I guess you need to read more and educate yourself, because you are not getting BTC's point if you think that not being ideal for fast micro-transactions is a flaw. Again: it was not designed with that in mind. The problems it solves are different, and deeper.

And it's failing at that.  

Yep. Sure. Started from scratch as a piece of code in 2009 and here we are, looking how all the three letter agencies stare at it. Even Coinseeker the patriot is hooked in the bitcointalk forums chatting with bitcoiners terrorists, because it is such a failure.

BTW, today I sent money BTC to one of my best friends who recently moved to a South American country. He cannot easily send money out of where he's currently living, nor receiving money from abroad, because he just opened a bank account and he has not been working in the country for at least 3 months, so international wires are "disabled". Funny regulation, right?. Well, we just said *fuck off* to that, only two hours ago. True story. But yeah, what a failure.

Saying that what is happening with Bitcoin now "is a failure" defines yourself.

So how does he plan to spend it?  Huh  

I knew you were going to ask that. OTC. It's not the most convenient way, but it's still a step towards freedom. 2 years ago, probably he wouldn't have found a single person to trade with where he is staying. Today, he will. These are just the first steps. And it's unstoppable, because there are many who, unlike you, are not happy about being enslaved by the ones controlling fiat money. There is such a powerful demand on what Bitcoin has to offer that you cannot even imagine.



624. Post 2407850 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 08, 2013, 02:45:44 AM

BTW, today I sent money BTC to one of my best friends who recently moved to a South American country. He cannot easily send money out of where he's currently living, nor receiving money from abroad, because he just opened a bank account and he has not been working in the country for at least 3 months, so international wires are "disabled". Funny regulation, right?. Well, we just said *fuck off* to that, only two hours ago. True story. But yeah, what a failure.

Saying that what is happening with Bitcoin now "is a failure" defines yourself.

Hmm , sorry but your story smells so fishy all the cats are going dizzy

first , it happend TODAY , great coin-cidence.
Second , you wwnt to the trouble of typing "to a South American country" instead of the actual country name
Third , I would like to know what country that is because the regulations you're talking about are also quite "interesting".

Also , what is he going to do with those bitcoins? eat them?


Don't be ridiculous. I took the time to type "a South American country" just because I value privacy and don't like to give much details in public forums. And it just happened today because happens often, both me and the people who I am related to are deeply into Bitcoin in many ways.



625. Post 2410096 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 08, 2013, 09:57:43 AM
Eh so it seems that the smartest thing to do now is somehow forget about clarkmoody and come back in 3 months.

If you are interested only in BTC going up up up, it may be the smartest thing indeed.

I find funny how all the ones singing the "BTC is only useful for Silk Road" song are noobs that probably came into BTC because it was going to the freaking moon, and they wanted fiat profit. Then, the BTC bubble bursted and entered the slow deflation, so they are bitter and sound butthurt, and keep saying that the only use of BTC are drugs and speculation, and unfortunately (for them) they were late in order to tenfold their investment speculating.

Really man, all this is so 2011. Exactly the same arguments.

If you are in this for profit, zoom out and think that the price was $0.07 in 2010. And $2 in November 2011. And $10ish just 6 months ago.

If you are in this because it's more than fiat profits, think that freedom is much more important than convenience. Screw micropayments. Bitcoin is here to help you to be free.



626. Post 2410242 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: gizmoh on June 08, 2013, 10:34:34 AM
The case for continuing downtrend:

The whales are not buying back. There is no buying pressure.

The price is hovering around 110 with low volume just like previous support at 120.

Another big dump comes in at 105 and all hell break loose.

Hello 100 and double digits..


I will welcome them with open arms  Grin

Ofcourse. What could better than Bitcoin going down! I can't think of anything.

Agree. Cheap coins might be 'costlier' at one point.

You really have weak faith in BTC if you think that a bubble deflation can "hurt" it. Let it go bust. It will slowly recover, real economy and infrastructure will slowly improve, and it will rise much stronger during the next hype cycle. It can happen in 2 years. Seriously, who cares? This is not a get quick rich investment. It's much more than that.



627. Post 2410325 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on June 08, 2013, 10:40:08 AM
People who went "all in" at 50 do care.

I'm all in and I don't give a shit. I will fall and raise with BTC  Wink



628. Post 2411837 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on June 08, 2013, 11:08:59 AM
People who went "all in" at 50 do care.

I'm all in and I don't give a shit. I will fall and raise with BTC  Wink

Being reckless with your decisions doesn't mean you are indifferent about them. Wink

First, i only invest what I can afford to lose.

Secondly, in my book being reckless means being out of BTC and into fiat (always considering that you put into this game only what you can afford to lose).



629. Post 2411903 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 08, 2013, 11:48:13 AM
Ok , I won't get it and I refuse to undestrand why bitcoin price has to go down in order to bounce back to 110+.

Second. I refuse to undestand how some of you can preach is a store of value when you expect it's value to halve in one- two weeks time.


Because "store of value" doesn't mean "get rich quick". Two weeks, three months mean nothing in the grand scheme of things. Just think that 1btc was worth $0.079 in may 2010, $2 in November 2011 and $10ish in 2012.

If we close 2013 at $40ish, BTC will have worked as an excellent store of value for me. It's the best I know. If you don't see it, then you are just short sighted. Maybe you wish to buy today at $100 and sell at $200 in one months. Well, wake up. That's not how it works. Stores of value are for the long term, especially if they are commodity like and thus prone to volatility and manipulation.

Just zoom out and look at the big picture, guys. Really why are you interested in BTC? For the quick easy buck?



630. Post 2411935 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 08, 2013, 11:51:05 AM
People who went "all in" at 50 do care.

I'm all in and I don't give a shit. I will fall and raise with BTC  Wink

Ideology is clouding your judgment.  Selling high and buying more of what you believe in lower, is a smarter move.

In fairness, I believe he sold 20% off as he saw this down move coming...

In fact I sold 20% + 15%, plus some play money. And I don't sell more because my average entry point is well below $30, I cannot predict the future and even if I see a down coming I won't gamble my full stash because it's very safe in my paper wallets. I'm in this for the long term.



631. Post 2411944 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: notme on June 08, 2013, 11:52:40 AM
Ok , I won't get it and I refuse to undestrand why bitcoin price has to go down in order to bounce back to 110+.

Second. I refuse to undestand how some of you can preach is a store of value when you expect it's value to halve in one- two weeks time.

Dude... it has only been above 30 for three months now.  Unless you bought in the middle of a hype cycle you have at least tripled your money at these prices.  However, I'm guessing based on your posts that you in fact did buy during the hype cycle.  Don't worry... in 6 months to a year we'll have another one.  Zoom the fuck out and relax.

THIS



632. Post 2411977 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 08, 2013, 11:59:40 AM
Ok , I won't get it and I refuse to undestrand why bitcoin price has to go down in order to bounce back to 110+.


It's because it's total nonsense based on nothing.


Because we had a speculative bubble which made the price go x20 in 3 months. And speculative bubbles need to fully deflate before a sustainable growth trend is resumed.

Jeeez, guys, we where buying BTC at $14 in January. Chill out and let the motherfucker correct before it goes up again.



633. Post 2412156 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on June 08, 2013, 03:15:56 PM
Ok , I won't get it and I refuse to undestrand why bitcoin price has to go down in order to bounce back to 110+.


It's because it's total nonsense based on nothing.


Because we had a speculative bubble which made the price go x20 in 3 months. And speculative bubbles need to fully deflate before a sustainable growth trend is resumed.

Jeeez, guys, we where buying BTC at $14 in January. Chill out and let the motherfucker correct before it goes up again.

Well said ... except the buying at $14 bit ... wasn't around for that unfortunately  Cry

That's the problem of all those crying about the price going down, because it "hurts the coin". Come on... It's so obvious they bought during or just after the hype cycle, and they are scared and butthurt.

Price goes up, prices goes down. Been like that since this baby was born in 2009. But, in the big picture, price is way UP. Even if it takes 2 more years to break $266, it will happen. Just chill and relax. If you bought during the bubble, bad luck, you should have known better, just don't make the same mistake made by those who bought during the 2011 bubble and cashed out for good at a loss because they were bitter and butthurt.

Bitcoin won't let you down, just use your brains and don't be a pussy. This baby needs to grow, and this game is played in the long term.



634. Post 2413950 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 08, 2013, 03:17:57 PM
Ok , I won't get it and I refuse to undestrand why bitcoin price has to go down in order to bounce back to 110+.

Second. I refuse to undestand how some of you can preach is a store of value when you expect it's value to halve in one- two weeks time.


Because "store of value" doesn't mean "get rich quick". Two weeks, three months mean nothing in the grand scheme of things. Just think that 1btc was worth $0.079 in may 2010, $2 in November 2011 and $10ish in 2012.

If we close 2013 at $40ish, BTC will have worked as an excellent store of value for me. It's the best I know. If you don't see it, then you are just short sighted. Maybe you wish to buy today at $100 and sell at $200 in one months. Well, wake up. That's not how it works. Stores of value are for the long term, especially if they are commodity like and thus prone to volatility and manipulation.

Just zoom out and look at the big picture, guys. Really why are you interested in BTC? For the quick easy buck?

Ah, now i finally understand your attitude. It's all about you. Just because you bought quite cheap everybody who didn't still has to understand how it's amazingly good it is if Bitcoin ends this year at 40 bucks. And if we don't see it we are short sighted.



No, it's not "about me", if this was "only about me" I could be bitter and angry because my "btc value" decreased by 50% since April, 10th.

Just do not expect btc to always go up in both mid and short term, especially not after a bubble burst. Because is nonsense. Night is dark, there's no surprise and is expected. On the contrary, expect BTC to go UP in the long term (years) - as it always did.

There's nothing to worry about, really. Bubbles need to burst all the way down.



635. Post 2413971 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: rdsc on June 08, 2013, 03:26:44 PM

Just zoom out and look at the big picture, guys. Really why are you interested in BTC? For the quick easy buck?

No, but we are in for the buck and that's got a lot more problematic from when you committed to BTC.  So what are newbies to do?

I believe in BTC in the same way I believe in IP4 - the internet learned how to do "money" - big news, and I'm late to the game.  Since only a lunatic would bet against the internet I'd like to put my money where my tech is, but just at the moment it's a suckers market - so beyond all the bulls and bears nonsense - how do we proceed?

I've clocked your buying advice and I'm following Goomboo and Slipperyslope because I'd like to be part of this without getting butt-fucked - but Bitcoin's got an insurmountable problem as a "freedom" protocol if the price for entry is pwnage.

I would wait to enter. And enter gradually. I'm doing that for a couple of friends, waiting and then I will spread the buys among different prices.

Pwnage is what the guys that cashed out for good during or after the 2011 bubble got.



636. Post 2418214 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 09, 2013, 06:42:39 AM
Yes, they are pretty cheap.

A few of us warned weeks ago that this would happen... people want cheap coins? Well there you go. You have them. Fat lot of good it will do you now.

I don't see anyone buying all those cheap coins. Amazing, isn't it?

Not really -- any hopes of recovery up until 2 weeks ago were pretty much ruined by manipulators aiming for "cheaper coins". It removed all steam from the market, and has cheapened the value of bitcoin. Now we're seeing the result -- the cash-out.

They wanted cheaper coins, they got them. It's time now for people to fully reconcile the phrase "cheap coins" with reality.

Date Registered:    14-03-2013, 03:59:40

Babby's first Bitcoin bear market/major correction. Wink

had friends mining them and selling (for 6$ or something) in 2010

Selling coins at $6 in 2010? Cool story, bro.



637. Post 2418271 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: SGExodus on June 09, 2013, 08:29:40 AM
Wait till the Avalon guys woke up and need to sell theiir 67k coins.

https://blockchain.info/address/1FGAftzSTztFSB8LMwsrdCKTyqGY6zr3sU

The Avalon guy was already "up" during this crash. Do you know in what time zone is China in, right?



638. Post 2418325 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 09, 2013, 08:30:35 AM
Yes, they are pretty cheap.

A few of us warned weeks ago that this would happen... people want cheap coins? Well there you go. You have them. Fat lot of good it will do you now.

I don't see anyone buying all those cheap coins. Amazing, isn't it?

Not really -- any hopes of recovery up until 2 weeks ago were pretty much ruined by manipulators aiming for "cheaper coins". It removed all steam from the market, and has cheapened the value of bitcoin. Now we're seeing the result -- the cash-out.

They wanted cheaper coins, they got them. It's time now for people to fully reconcile the phrase "cheap coins" with reality.

Date Registered:    14-03-2013, 03:59:40

Babby's first Bitcoin bear market/major correction. Wink

had friends mining them and selling (for 6$ or something) in 2010

Selling coins at $6 in 2010? Cool story, bro.

Sorry this guy was in Poland and I think was selling them for around 30PLN, it was a guy with nick "duniek"

Considering that the absolute maximum price at which BTC were traded in 2010 is $0.5, your" duniek" friend is a boss indeed. Did he bought an island and retired? Was he selling Bitcoins at $3000 in 2013?



639. Post 2418666 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):



By the way, all this "let's wait to the US to wake up is nonsense". Most of the time, when the US wakes up after a crash, nothing more happens. Do you remember last Sunday? Same songs were singed.



640. Post 2421938 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Sold some at 98ish, sold some at the bottomish around $90 (as usual).

IMO the case for the "correction" is officially debunked, we are officially in the bubble deflation process, thus I expect it to go lower. Testing $80, and if it falls, testing $50. I'll load the truck at that point.

I would love for it to be fast, as we could enter a mid term growth phase quicker, but I'm afraid it will be long process. I expect plenty of traps and mini sucker rallies, as usual during bubbles deflation.

Edit: it hurts to sell coins, those paper wallets really looked at me with sad eyes, but at the end of the day the purpose is for them to be replenished ASAP with more coins they holded now.

I'm now a lonely bear with only 20% of the BTC holdings I had a couple of weeks ago, at least I can comfort myself thinking that I'm still a supernode, of the lowest grade, but still a supernode at the end of the day  Grin



641. Post 2422084 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 09, 2013, 05:06:57 PM
Sold some at 98ish, sold some at the bottomish around $90 (as usual).

IMO the case for the "correction" is officially debunked, we are officially in the bubble deflation process, thus I expect it to go lower. Testing $80, and if it falls, testing $50. I'll load the truck at that point.

I would love for it to be fast, as we could enter a mid term growth phase quicker, but I'm afraid it will be long process. I expect plenty of traps and mini sucker rallies, as usual during bubbles deflation.
Are you going for some more ASICs or are you just looking to buy lower? I thought you never wanted to sell precious BTC to speculate. Tongue

I sold a big amount (approx. 40% of my holdings) for the ASIC's. That happened on Monday at $118ish. Today I sold a similar chunk, and this is for speculation. Yeah, you are right that I always preach about not selling the precious coins. But still, this is one of those occasions were I cannot miss the opportunity for cheaper coins. One thing is to speculate to catch the bottom of the weekly dip, which I don't do, and a very different one is to hold on all your coins desperately during a bubble deflation.

Still, I a have paper wallet I'll never touch. I cannot be 100% out of BTC, I'm not mentally prepared for that Smiley



642. Post 2423068 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: gandhibt on June 09, 2013, 06:08:00 PM
Sold some at 98ish, sold some at the bottomish around $90 (as usual).

IMO the case for the "correction" is officially debunked, we are officially in the bubble deflation process, thus I expect it to go lower. Testing $80, and if it falls, testing $50. I'll load the truck at that point.

I would love for it to be fast, as we could enter a mid term growth phase quicker, but I'm afraid it will be long process. I expect plenty of traps and mini sucker rallies, as usual during bubbles deflation.
Are you going for some more ASICs or are you just looking to buy lower? I thought you never wanted to sell precious BTC to speculate. Tongue

I sold a big amount (approx. 40% of my holdings) for the ASIC's. That happened on Monday at $118ish. Today I sold a similar chunk, and this is for speculation. Yeah, you are right that I always preach about not selling the precious coins. But still, this is one of those occasions were I cannot miss the opportunity for cheaper coins. One thing is to speculate to catch the bottom of the weekly dip, which I don't do, and a very different one is to hold on all your coins desperately during a bubble deflation.

Still, I a have paper wallet I'll never touch. I cannot be 100% out of BTC, I'm not mentally prepared for that Smiley

Can you repeat the facts that lead to your decision to sell now? Just with dashes would be great, thanks!

Less and less buyers, fiat leaving, bubble deflating, etc.



643. Post 2423095 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Voktar on June 09, 2013, 07:05:59 PM
Selling pressure dismissing, going to $100 again. Have we reached the bubble bottom finally?

Bubble bottom was $50 IMO. But i also believe we will explore it again



644. Post 2424841 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

More to come Wink



645. Post 2427987 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Rally on volume... And we were just where we were before the crash to sub-$100... And with buying volume as we didn't have for many weeks.

Crazy BTC Wink



646. Post 2428189 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Feeling playful lately. Bought some on the way up at $101ish due to move up backed up by volume, sold at $108.5

I don't expect BTC breaking $115 before crashing again.



647. Post 2429880 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):




648. Post 2430153 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: hlynur on June 10, 2013, 01:18:22 PM
wow, ok i was totally wrong expecting dumps during the night...
so just one ridiculously big pump to 110$?

hmm smells like a possible bulltrap to me.
perhaps then next dump middle of this week?

This time we had significant buying volume on the way up, which is something we haven't seen for weeks. That's a good sign for the bulls theoretically speaking, but that volume vanished as soon as we touched $110.

The problem here is that without buying pressure price cannot go up. Sure, the sellers sit tight and hold, so price slowly creeps up (with low volume) or stays stable… But as soon as someone needs to cash out +10k BTC there we go, down the cliff. No buyers to stop the free fall, which stops only when the dumper runs out of ammo.

After selling a lot between $90 and $118ish, I bought back a little coins at $101ish, sold them again at $108.5 earlier today. I expect the price to go lower than $90 soon enough.



649. Post 2430344 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Price plummeting as expected. The big buyers who propped the price up from $99 to $110 where kinda reckless - there's absolutely no buying pressure to support their move.

Now we have a mini-wall of aprox. $240k at $101. Lately we hadn't had much "fake walls" being pulled, both bid and asks have been pretty "honest" and they have been filled. Therefore, that mini-wall at $101 could slow the downtrend a bit. Anyhow, I really don't see the point of buying at $101, as there is absolutely no support around $100, apart from that mini-wall at $101. Next real support point at $90, and next crucial support at $80ish -> if that point is broken, $50 coins will be around the corner.




650. Post 2430589 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Mini-wall at $101 growing, is aprox. $270k ATM.

It's slowing the downturn as expected, let's see how much it resists. It's kinda small for the "bright times" standards, when we had +$1M walls, but it's still significant with such low volumes.

EDIT: mini-wall just went down to $160k... Fake or not, I guess some buyers realize that there is no point in buying at $101 when you will be able to buy at $90ish (or even lower) soon enough.



651. Post 2430758 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

During the last weeks, I'm having the strong impression that the new official "market makers" are Chinese.

Just take a look to the times of the day in which big moves happen. It's always deep night in the US (the big buys that propped up the price today happened around midnight NYC time). And then, remember how in March everything "big" happened when the US waked up, including the April, 10th chart. Biggest activity was always during USA daytime.

This changed completely during the last weeks. I'm in Europe, and usually big moves are happening while I'm waking up. And I'm pretty sure there are not many big european players, because the US was always leading the market, and nothing relevant happened in order to shift the "power" to europeans.

On the contrary, just think on the huge amount of coins ASICminer is piling up. Just a friendly reminder, aprox. 15% of the coins rewarded daily (3,600 in total) go to asicminer. Half of that goes to public shareholders. The other half, stays in ASICminers and private shareholders hands. Then, you have the huge revenue stream coming for overpriced hardware sales. They really got a big piece of the pie ATM, and I'm quite sure that piece of the pie was taken from US hands.

What about Avalon? They should be controlling +100kBTC at the moment.

So - what do you think? We can officially say that we have to wait till "China wakes up" from now on?

PS: Coinseeker, I know that hurts... But it is what it is Wink



652. Post 2430857 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: rpietila on June 10, 2013, 02:57:42 PM
To me, it seems that Bitcoin is resting on the 6mo-exp trendline with low volume, and $.12 is the new $0.005.

There is not much to do then hold (= buy bitcoins with everything that you can spare).

It is becoming unlikely that we'll see $300 this year.

I am fine, thank you.

Welcome back!

So, not even $300 by this year? So we can rule out $300,000 per BTC for sure, right?

What a pity...



653. Post 2430896 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 10, 2013, 02:55:25 PM
During the last weeks, I'm having the strong impression that the new official "market makers" are Chinese.

Just take a look to the times of the day in which big moves happen. It's always deep night in the US (the big buys that propped up the price today happened around midnight NYC time). And then, remember how in March everything "big" happened when the US waked up, including the April, 10th chart. Biggest activity was always during USA daytime.

This changed completely during the last weeks. I'm in Europe, and usually big moves are happening while I'm waking up. And I'm pretty sure there are not many big european players, because the US was always leading the market, and nothing relevant happened in order to shift the "power" to europeans.

On the contrary, just think on the huge amount of coins ASICminer is piling up. Just a friendly reminder, aprox. 15% of the coins rewarded daily (3,600 in total) go to asicminer. Half of that goes to public shareholders. The other half, stays in ASICminers and private shareholders hands. Then, you have the huge revenue stream coming for overpriced hardware sales. They really got a big piece of the pie ATM, and I'm quite sure that piece of the pie was taken from US hands.

What about Avalon? They should be controlling +100kBTC at the moment.

So - what do you think? We can officially say that we have to wait till "China wakes up" from now on?

PS: Coinseeker, I know that hurts... But it is what it is Wink

So why Beijing and not Tokyo?
It's just an hour difference and you can safely assume there are lots of people holding coins in Japan , or at least one Smiley)))

But , If they target this hour specificaly , how can you rule out their are US traders?
For a few thousands or more dollars most people will stay awake or wake up in the middle of the night!


Well, Satoshi's holdings are public (blockchain anybody?) and not a single coin belonging to him has ever moved. Plus, Satoshi is not Japanese, he is very probably an individual or a group of people living in Ireland/Europe.

If you want to know the "reasons why" of what I'm saying above just use research this forums using the search function.

Then, of course it could be US traders staying awake till 3AM, but it seems unlikely considering that lately all the volume is happening at those times (deep night in the US), while till April (even May) big moves happened always during US daytime, and in fact you could see big spikes on volumes as soon as it was aprox. 9AM in NYC, lasting till aprox 7PM NYC time, when everything calmed down.

Add to this speculation the irrefutable fact that in the last months the two biggest new Bitcoin-superpowers are Chinese (Avalon and ASICminer)



654. Post 2430955 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: niothor on June 10, 2013, 03:09:42 PM
Rumors are that this is avalon adress
https://blockchain.info/address/1FGAftzSTztFSB8LMwsrdCKTyqGY6zr3sU

and the coins are sitting still Smiley

Avalon hasn't got a single BTC address - or you do?. I bought Avalon, and I didn't send BTC to that address.

If you see the amounts, you will see that those payments are for the chips only. And apart the coins on that address Avalon got at least another big chunk from Batch #2 and Batch #3 sales.



655. Post 2431009 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 10, 2013, 03:17:30 PM

It is becoming unlikely that we'll see $300 this year.


TIME TO PANIC

$300 per mBTC  Smiley

If rpietila lost faith in his ultra bullish (verging on bull-shit) stance, it's as if pope said "ok, there is no god"  Grin
He has been in a mental institution, probably just got a reality check and have now readjusted the target. He is still bullish, and a super node, you, on the other hand, is neither, if I had to guess.

Suuuupppernode lifestyle here we come  Grin Grin

and welcome back rpietila!

I'm bullish, I just believe that we will hit 30 before rebounding to new highs Wink

$30 per mBTC? Rpietila is among us, so we should be sticking to supernode's language. It's a demonstration of respect.



656. Post 2431583 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on June 10, 2013, 04:18:54 PM

Well, Satoshi's holdings are public (blockchain anybody?) and not a single coin belonging to him has ever moved.

When last did you check?

Today?



657. Post 2432176 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 10, 2013, 05:30:52 PM
all you bears are going to turn bull as soon as you sell  Tongue

as soon as you buy?



658. Post 2432217 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 10, 2013, 05:35:58 PM
i think we can make a new high off this rally, 180 , and i think we can do it in 2 weeks time.

bears, prepare to shit yourselves

 Cool

Well, if we break $165, is "to the moon" indeed Cheesy



659. Post 2432469 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: deathcode on June 10, 2013, 06:10:42 PM
Man, panic buying going on. As soon as it hits 120, I'm shorting like crazy...

Smiley

apparently manipulators want the price to keep high for a wile.. Smiley  
the drop will be massive. ..
we might hit real bottom this time  
there's not enough bying power yet to turn trend imho.

been watching orderbook .. the real buy power isnt there yet..  but it's definately bigger as last weeks..  

even when i'm having a little loss..  i rather have moving volumes then boring trading as last weeks..  so i can correct my mistakes

+1
The increase in volume is mainly due to traders scalping on higher volatility with some isolated big buys and lemmings following. The trend is still downward currently.

+2 unfortunately, I don't see a bullish market now. despite some efforts It's sad that the price tends to move down... The big buys were isolated efforts from big buyers but I don't see collective push towards the 110's yet... if this week stays in the 105 range, next weekend will be devastating...
Sad

"Devastating" in what sense? I would say that it will be a great weekend for those waiting in order to load the truck Wink



660. Post 2432726 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: deathcode on June 10, 2013, 06:35:37 PM
Man, panic buying going on. As soon as it hits 120, I'm shorting like crazy...

Smiley

apparently manipulators want the price to keep high for a wile.. Smiley  
the drop will be massive. ..
we might hit real bottom this time  
there's not enough bying power yet to turn trend imho.

been watching orderbook .. the real buy power isnt there yet..  but it's definately bigger as last weeks..  

even when i'm having a little loss..  i rather have moving volumes then boring trading as last weeks..  so i can correct my mistakes

+1
The increase in volume is mainly due to traders scalping on higher volatility with some isolated big buys and lemmings following. The trend is still downward currently.

+2 unfortunately, I don't see a bullish market now. despite some efforts It's sad that the price tends to move down... The big buys were isolated efforts from big buyers but I don't see collective push towards the 110's yet... if this week stays in the 105 range, next weekend will be devastating...
Sad

"Devastating" in what sense? I would say that it will be a great weekend for those waiting in order to load the truck Wink

Devastating for the bulls. Bears are happy campers lately. I do pitty them for being late in the game though but I reckon is their time to be happy.


Late as for not being able to buy sub-$1? Sub-$14?

We have bears in here that bought coins at dollar parity for the first time. And precisely because they bought so cheap they are selling (because that is what bears do), taking some profits, and waiting to multiply their holdings as close as possible to the bottom.



661. Post 2437578 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 11, 2013, 03:23:10 AM
This video is over 2 months old.

And why would Kevin O'Leary use such a small exchange?


cavirtex is first class, deposited funds can clear in less then 10 mins. Its the best exchange for canadians


So? If I have many thousands of dollars worth of buying to do, why take such a small exchange?
Not only the slippage would kill you, but so would their 3% fee.
the fees are 0.5% if your a market maker.

1 reason to take your fiat to smaller exchanges would be to buy up as many coins as you can , and not directly affect the mtgox price


The fees are 0.5% only if you have already done transactions for at least 2500 BTC.

You don't affect the MtGox price, but you do affect even more the local exchange price.

truth is his bid will fill, and its not like he would of gotten ALOT more bitcoin if he had when through the trouble of sending to MtGox, and sending money to mtgox doesn't take 10 mins, but at cavirtex it does

First, you don't know if the bid will fill.
It might, if the market goes down.
One thing is certain: they can't buy at market without an insane slippage.

Second, no it doesn't take 10 mins!

Use E-interac like I used to? No, they stopped that.

Deposit money into their RBC account... oh wait no that's closed.

So, using other banks and options:
Online Bill Payment ---> 3 to 5 days, Daily Limit: $10,000.00
Direct Withdraw ----> 3 to 5 days, Daily Limit: $10,000.00

Both assuming you are already verified.

You could still use
Cash deposit ----> Processing Time: Same day, Daily Limit: $3,000.00
But then you aren't such a big player...

So yes, I'm still wondering WTH is happening there.

And BTW, 0.5% fee is still outrageous.

I have something in between of 0.3% and 0.36% at Gox, and I consider it very expensive (and is still quite cheaper than the "default" 0.5%). With the current BTC price and volume, Gox should lower A LOT the fees.



662. Post 2437632 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: bigdude on June 11, 2013, 07:07:44 AM
they are a business, why would they lower their fees, when they don't have to ?

Because it's outrageous. I made a rough calculation the other day and I paid them THOUSANDS of € in fees in the last months, trading quite lightly and manually. But yeah, you are right. Until there is no competitor applying reasonable fees, everybody is going to charge the maximum the market allows them. That's how you run a business.



663. Post 2438972 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: rpietila on June 11, 2013, 10:35:02 AM
We are in the "early/pricing" stage of an exponentially growing (later: S-growing) phenomenon. If everything goes as it has done in several bubbles before, the great bubble will form when 1-2% of the population had adopted the technology. For Bitcoin, this means about 50 million adapters that actually use bitcoin for something. This "something has so far been lagging, though".

I withdrew my prediction for $300 for 2013, but this does not mean that I was sure it will not happen. In 2014 it will happen for sure. Or some 1.5-sigma event happens.

The great moves have been able to push the price up roughly by an order of magnitude. We need 4 such moves and the rest of this year is not long enough time. April-June 2014 is now my target.

Current price I would just buy as much as I can.

So, willing to do an escrowed bet against everybody willing to join in this forums, regarding NOT arriving at $300,000 per BTC by 2014?



664. Post 2438991 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Bearish triangle closing very soon. Up or down?

I say down, but I don't discard breaking $110 for a while before the crash to double digits. I speculated a bit between yesterday and today, bought at 77€ and sold between 81.22€ and 81.77€ during last night and this morning. Volume very low, not easy at all to trade +150BTC ATM avoiding slippage.




665. Post 2439843 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: strawbs on June 11, 2013, 11:34:00 AM
I'm currently 100% fiat again, looking for a suitable price to buy back in (very speculatively, I'm looking at something around USD52, since I think USD50 will be a psychological trigger with mass-buy in, that will see the beginning of a steady, sustainable, non-bubbled climb)

Oh boy, we are really all on the same page. In fact, after reading your post, I decided to put my biggest bid a tad higher, it was at $52.25 and now it's now at $53.75 (aprox., I'm trading in EUR). My biggest bid during the April, 10th crash was unfilled, as it was at 37ish€, and I missed it for such a low margin... I think the absolute low was 37.8€ or something like that. I still did a nice profit as I re-loaded the truck at an average price of 50€ish ($65ish), but still I don't want that to happen again Wink




666. Post 2440253 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: strawbs on June 11, 2013, 01:31:48 PM
Isn't that gambling, defined?  Some day traders do more than simply watch the price & ignore past performance etc.

Maybe it would be if the market had any volume, but since mid April/early May the market moves exclusively at the whims of traders who have 6 or 7 figures. There's little to no combined influence from a multitude of smaller players to offset the manipulation attempts of traders with huge amounts of fiat on the exchanges. People with a few thousand or a few tens of thousands of dollars can't move the market. Their combined activity can, but as individuals, they can't. So when volume is low and the price just sits there, whether a trade is profitable or not comes down to what move the whales make, because there's no market momentum because nobody wants to trade when the price is above 100 unless it's rippling from a large move. You can't tell what move one or two people with that much manipulative ability are going to make via TA.

The run we just went through to 135 after the 60-166-79 correction, once it rallied above 105ish, only happened because one or a few people would show up in the early morning or the middle of the night and shove the market up with a 5,000BTC buy, let the market settle, and then do it again the next day or the day after that. The moves raised the price because speculators decided to take a shot on riding the train, that kind of a move doesn't incite a panic sell, and the other whales won't dump against you because it's more profitable to wait for the combined momentum of smaller players who are buying to fizzle out before dumping. It is pretty much exactly what has been happening since the dumps below 120 last week as well.

The market doesn't have confidence in the price above $100, period. The only reason it's been floating here since the post-166 correction is because the market is entirely speculation and bots. Bots give the illusion that trades are happening and the market is moving upward and a whale comes behind that illusion (probably because it's his bot) and plays against it. Low volume is very dangerous.

If people thought the price was profitable we'd see the kind of volume you see between 80-90-100. People are only buying right now because they're short term speculating, exchanging B for fiat for their business, or buying and holding and not giving a fuck about what happens on smaller time frames. The price isn't dropping because a few people with 20 or 200B simply can't affect market depth.

And even when they all sell at once and do affect market depth, you still get phenomena like the other day when someone showed up and bought 15kB from 101 to 111.

Under this kind of circumstance a hard, downward, long term correction is inevitable and it's only a question of how to make money in the interim.

Manipulation like this is actually very damaging to the market because when the correction does come and it makes the news, it makes a lot of the potential newcomers to Bitcoin feel the whole system is a fraudulent scam. You only saw the massive swing from doubles to 250+ because of a huge influx of new players. If that phenomenon never happens again, you can completely forget about ever seeing $200B again, let alone higher.

+1  Couldn't agree more

I also agree. Lack of volume is a bad signal for bulls, but nevertheless BTC is such a tiny market that a 7 figures player can move it at his will. We can all be expecting a downturn, and a couple of whales can trigger a 30% increase in the blink of an eye, and the opposite is also true.

That said, is clear to me that there's absolutely no confidence on over-$100 prices. Apart from yesterday, where we saw upwards movement backed by significant volume, during the last weeks all the rallies were on ridiculous volume. Unfortunately for the short-term bulls, when volume appeared it was to bring the price way down.

I think things will change a lot as soon as we approach $50-$60. As you all know I think $50 was the very post-bubble bottom, and that we won't go below that (even if I wouldn't completely discard shortly visiting $30ish). It seems to me that a lot of players have the same impression, so I expect huge buying pressure in the $50-$60 range.

That said, reading these forums it seems that even the perma-bulls are holding fiat ATM. Heck, I've been almost 100% of BTC since late 2012, and right now I'm 80% fiat - the 20% BTC remaining was bought below $15 and is resting in a paper wallet for good, no intention to get rid of those coins in the next years to come. So, if someone like me is 80% fiat at the moment, sometimes I wonder if there's any trader left to sell.

I guess we will have to count on ASICminer coins Wink



667. Post 2441011 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: Jozzaboy on June 11, 2013, 03:14:17 PM
Price rising again with very low volume... painting the tape?  Can we expect touching $110 today and $115 tomorrow?

Damn manipulators Sad Let the bubble deflate completely!

Anyway, i'm not buying it, sitting 100% on fiat until we go under $80, then i will start purchasing little by little.

Oh man, you're going to be butthurt when it hits $120. On the other hand, I can see $120 then crash to $90 and below. If not, $180 in a month.

Calm down boys. Before going to $180 it has to break $166. When $166 is broken, the sky is the limit.



668. Post 2441481 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: kickinyou on June 11, 2013, 04:18:32 PM
When comes the dump ?

Anytime from now to $120, but I would say sooner than later. Rally on extremely low volume, fishy.



669. Post 2441614 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 11, 2013, 04:36:13 PM
We are in the "early/pricing" stage of an exponentially growing (later: S-growing) phenomenon. If everything goes as it has done in several bubbles before, the great bubble will form when 1-2% of the population had adopted the technology. For Bitcoin, this means about 50 million adapters that actually use bitcoin for something. This "something" has so far been lagging, though.

I withdrew my prediction for $300 for 2013, but this does not mean that I was sure it will not happen. In 2014 it will happen for sure. Or some 1.5-sigma event happens.

The great moves have been able to push the price up roughly by an order of magnitude. We need 4 such moves and the rest of this year is not long enough time. April-June 2014 is now my target.

Current price I would just buy as much as I can.

Are you expecting at least one 10-fold move this year, though?

I think it is certainly possible for it not to happen (in which case this would be a lame year of anything between 500-3000% growth  Cheesy ) but considering:
1. bitcoin adoption rates even now,
2. and the spread of information rate,
3. and the ease of developing Bitcoin-services,
4. and the superiority of bitcoin over all the competitors
5. and the upstartness of altcoins etc etc

Everything points to me a violent upmove once the profit-taking consolidation ends.

I agree!,
I think consolidation has already ended at least at these low prices it has, so i'm predicting 180 within 2 weeks.
I don't think we can make a new all time high so soon, but i do think we can get to 180 and stay in that range + - 10%

I won't believe that until we are well over $130, and I will not be sure about that until $166 is broken.



670. Post 2442632 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.03h):

Usual trolling apart, let's see if $110 stands another assault.

Come on guys, if it's broken on the upside, who is panic buying in here?



671. Post 2443430 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Richy_T on June 11, 2013, 07:57:05 PM
The biggest threat to Bitcoin right now IS regulation.
+1 can't argue with that

I do.

The biggest threat to regulation is Bitcoin


Cheesy

Cheesy

This is what scare guys like coin seeker, it feels so warm and comfortable in FEDs bosom, or using Ripple, the final "debt+trust as a currency" centralized system....

BTC its not only internet's cash, free as a bird and superior by orders of magnitude to its paper counterpart, it's also regulated by math and not by those who have the power to press the button of the money printing machines.

A lot of power to the people, gentlemen.



672. Post 2443510 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: KS on June 11, 2013, 08:17:12 PM
The biggest threat to Bitcoin right now IS regulation.
+1 can't argue with that

I do.

The biggest threat to regulation is Bitcoin


Cheesy

Cheesy

This is what scare guys like coin seeker, it feels so warm and comfortable in FEDs bosom, or using Ripple, the final "debt+trust as a currency" centralized system....

BTC its not only internet's cash, free as a bird and superior by orders of magnitude to its paper counterpart, it's also regulated by math and not by those who have the power to press the button of the money printing machines.

A lot of power to the people, gentlemen.

I think that, like in every market, BTC is regulated by whalemath. Liqidity is an obvious issue and Bitcoin would greatly benefit from a simplification of the exchange with fiat. It's a PAIN to get into Bitcoin. Exchanges should (probably) also work closer together to allow for more arbitrage opportunities.

True. Buying your first Bitcoins is slow. Deciding to throw serious money at it is a lengthy process, first you need to feel confident with its "shaky" infrastructure (Gox et. al).. This is why it's a huge opportunity to be into BTC now, because money flow to BTC is much slower than it could be. When real money starts to pour in, there will be a bubble of epic proportions. All time high $ on Gox order book is $23M, imagine a market depth of hundreds of millions... Per exchange Wink



673. Post 2443701 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on June 11, 2013, 08:28:52 PM


This is what scare guys like coin seeker, it feels so warm and comfortable in FEDs bosom, or using Ripple, the final "debt+trust as a currency" centralized system....

BTC its not only internet's cash, free as a bird and superior by orders of magnitude to its paper counterpart, it's also regulated by math and not by those who have the power to press the button of the money printing machines.

A lot of power to the people, gentlemen.

Power to the rich people and massive coin holders.  No different than the current banking and government status quo.  Just nerdier. 

What you say is that wealthy people rules, well thats how capitalism works, and Bitcoin was never designed to address that. Its just the most neutral form of money you can conceive.  And "the current banking system and government status quo" face a huge, game-changing challenge with Bitcoin, only that by itself is a huge step forward.



674. Post 2443787 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Richy_T on June 11, 2013, 08:51:06 PM
The big speculators are easy to beat. Just don't play their game.

BUY??? SELL???

Huh Huh Huh



675. Post 2444214 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: KS on June 11, 2013, 09:06:53 PM


This is what scare guys like coin seeker, it feels so warm and comfortable in FEDs bosom, or using Ripple, the final "debt+trust as a currency" centralized system....

BTC its not only internet's cash, free as a bird and superior by orders of magnitude to its paper counterpart, it's also regulated by math and not by those who have the power to press the button of the money printing machines.

A lot of power to the people, gentlemen.

Power to the rich people and massive coin holders.  No different than the current banking and government status quo.  Just nerdier.  

What you say is that wealthy people rules, well thats how capitalism works, and Bitcoin was never designed to address that. Its just the most neutral form of money you can conceive.  And "the current banking system and government status quo" face a huge, game-changing challenge with Bitcoin, only that by itself is a huge step forward.


We'll just have to agree to disagree on the "game-changing challenge".  $1 billion market cap??  Laughable at best.  It's not even a drop, of a drop in the bucket.  They're not worried.  Not at all.

I'll go for *potentially* game changing.

I dream of a hardware miner/wallet that you'd use as your home ATM...plug and play, secure.

Yeah, mini USB miners could have such a potential, if only a player could have the manufacturing resources to produce millions of them and price them reasonably, it could do so much for wider adoption... A machine that actually produces income, explain that to your grandma Wink



676. Post 2444352 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on June 11, 2013, 09:53:18 PM

I'll go for *potentially* game changing.

I dream of a hardware miner/wallet that you'd use as your home ATM...plug and play, secure.

That's a pretty cool idea.  However, that assumes that what is being kept secure, is still valuable.  With this manipulation and no safeguards in place any big money player can destroy Bitcoin.  I didn't realize that before, but now it is blatantly clear.  Let's use any government that has $1 billion to spare.

They could build massive mining rigs and with the rest, purchase BTC slowly.  It wouldn't take long before they would control enough BTC to just continually smash the markets with wave after wave of coordinated "dump attacks".  All confidence would be would be lost.  Current investors would flee into other currencies and investments.  Potential investors would stay away from a corrupt and manipulated currency.  It's actually a better Achilles heel than any regulation could dream of having.  

So in the end, Bitcoin's greatest weakness, is it's very own principles of non-regulation.  The irony is quite amusing.

That kind of attack could be indeed the most effective way to destabilize Bitcoin, much more effective than a ban, but still is an attack that becomes more expensive to perform year after year, and the final outcome is not clear. Let them try, this experiment has to be proven and tested under all kind of stress. I have plenty of popcorn.



677. Post 2444377 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: crumbs on June 11, 2013, 10:02:23 PM
Yeah, mini USB miners could have such a potential, if only a player could have the manufacturing resources to produce millions of them and price them reasonably, it could do so much for wider adoption... A machine that actually produces income, explain that to your grandma Wink

I'm sure grandma has seen a Coke machine in action Cheesy

I hope you get the idea despite of my poor English Smiley



678. Post 2444647 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on June 11, 2013, 10:06:59 PM

I'll go for *potentially* game changing.

I dream of a hardware miner/wallet that you'd use as your home ATM...plug and play, secure.

That's a pretty cool idea.  However, that assumes that what is being kept secure, is still valuable.  With this manipulation and no safeguards in place any big money player can destroy Bitcoin.  I didn't realize that before, but now it is blatantly clear.  Let's use any government that has $1 billion to spare.

They could build massive mining rigs and with the rest, purchase BTC slowly.  It wouldn't take long before they would control enough BTC to just continually smash the markets with wave after wave of coordinated "dump attacks".  All confidence would be would be lost.  Current investors would flee into other currencies and investments.  Potential investors would stay away from a corrupt and manipulated currency.  It's actually a better Achilles heel than any regulation could dream of having.  

So in the end, Bitcoin's greatest weakness, is it's very own principles of non-regulation.  The irony is quite amusing.

Worst. Attack. Idea. Ever.

The attacker would be dumping free money until he/she runs out and then the system would continue to run as usual.

Indeed they are free to donate their money to the market. Then again, it isn't really their money to begin with is it?

BTC is so tiny that the FED could just buy enough BTC to make it skyrocket in en epic pump, then crash it to single digits, creating a few notable fortunes and ruining millions of people on the way. Burning people with BTC seems indeed more effective than simply banning it.

Still, they would be burning piles of money, this is an expensive stunt to perform, "affordable" only by an economic super-power willing to virtually destroy money to try to get rid of Bitcoin. BTC is still too small to deserve such kind of attention, if they decide to play the pump&dump game they really need to go till the end, waking up the sleeping monster Cheesy

In a few years, not even the FED may afford such kind of attack. And if they do, it will be a hell of a ride and nice fight. Keep'em coming.



679. Post 2444752 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Pale Phoenix on June 11, 2013, 10:30:36 PM
We're already past the point where half of the coins are in circulation. But think about the bold bit of your quote. You are suggesting they could kill bitcoins by giving to bitcoin owners the market value in fiat.
That is not killing it, that is embracing it. They would need to buy many bitcoins, I don't know what your definition of slowly is, but you are suggesting they would provide continuous demand for BTC. By the time they dump them, the markets will gratefully eat them and ask for more.

I think the point is that a government actor could most easily destabilize the BTC market this way, and in doing so, make it too risky to use.

A billion dollar market is a tenth of a rounding error to a large government, and if this was carried out in the name of "national security," the costs would be irrelevant (and classified) anyway. They wouldn't care that they enrich a few thousand people in order to shut down a way for evil-doers to finance their operations.

This is an interesting idea to play with, but IMO, highly unlikely. I think they are more likely to apply the necessary pressure to the weak points in the system in order to track and monitor the movement of large sums.

It's true that 1 billion cap is tiny, but to buy enough coins to really control the market in a "definitive" way you need to spend A LOT more than its seems, supply is very limited, and for this kind of attack you really want to expose as many people as possible to your stunt - traders are not afraid of volatility, if you want people to run away from BTC you need to really skyrocket it to the moon to then crush it to the closest to 0 as possible. That wont cost hundreds of millions, that will cost billions ATM, and every year that passes this kind of attack gets more and more expensive.

And then, do not forget that Satoshi never moved a single coin. He controls at least 1M BTC. He's holding to be able to neutralize any deep-pockets attacker Cheesy (tinfoil hat mode off)



680. Post 2444781 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on June 11, 2013, 10:39:29 PM
BTC is so tiny that the FED could just buy enough BTC to make it skyrocket in en epic pump, then crash it to single digits, creating a few notable fortunes and ruining millions of people on the way. Burning people with BTC seems indeed more effective than simply banning it.

If they do this I'll thank them. It would be easier for them to wire me the funds directly though.

Well, I'd say you would be in the "few notable fortunes" group. Adam too. TheKoziTwo, too. Coinseeker, no, because he has probably dumped all his coins for XRPs Cheesy



681. Post 2444964 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: dexX7 on June 11, 2013, 10:52:53 PM
Burning people with BTC seems indeed more effective than simply banning it.

There were many burned in the 266 crash, but overall I think a crazy market is an magnet for speculators.

if you want people to run away from BTC you need to really skyrocket it to the moon to then crush it to the closest to 0 as possible. That wont cost hundreds of millions, that will cost billions ATM, and every year that passes this kind of attack gets more and more expensive.

Which would be a lot of free money. And the lower it crashes, the more demand there will be. It's a zero-sum game with the FED loosing all the time.

A crash from $266 to 50 is nothing (1/5). A crash from $32 to $2 is nothing (1/16). That's volatility.

A 1/10,000 crash... Well, thats something. That's "a ponzi" that hugely rewards the first in and first out and leave holding the bag everyone else. But still, money it's not infinite even if it seems to be, the burning has to stop at some point... BTC market will always be manipulated as all the markets are, including and especially the commodities ones (prominently gold and silver), but the more BTC grows, the more expensive it becomes to effectively control it. So, this may be an obvious attack to BTC (manipulation), but an expensive one that has an uncertain outcome. I'm also convinced that BTC would survive.



682. Post 2445082 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 11, 2013, 11:23:11 PM
Is this a Goomboo Bot Spike?


This was the 10/21 crossover early on June 10 - I missed it because I was asleep but it seems to be holding

the spike made the crossover,  the crossover did not make the spike.

Correct, little grasshopper

Cheesy



683. Post 2448099 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: ineededausername on June 12, 2013, 01:31:03 AM
I wonder when Loaded will come back to stop the downturn.  Perhaps we need to say his name three times.

Loaded, Loaded, Loaded!

Loaded = The Winklevoss twins? Cheesy

Anyhow, he just comes here to say "this is going to be an interesting week"... Las time just after the San José conference. And that week nothing happened, it was boring as hell Cheesy



684. Post 2448126 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Asks piling up all the way to $110. The sellers will become nervous sooner or later, there are too many coins till $110 and no buying pressure whatsoever. Someone that bought from $100 to $105 has to decide wether to sell at a profit at $108 or panic sell and probably lose money if a seller get tired to wait and dumps as few coins as 700-800, pushing the price down.



685. Post 2448908 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Bid and ask sum stable. Volume decreasing. Triangle closing.

I would close any long position.




686. Post 2449755 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: San1ty on June 12, 2013, 10:43:34 AM
I told, I have three things I need to do in bitcoinworld to make it $300/mBTC this year.

Then they took me to a mental institution, and what I wrote, could not be established without me. Even now, it is unlikely that I will be the sole contributor. But please take a look about one of the three pillars. When something is not good, comment to add. It is not ready, and I am under medication, for which reason I also cannot talk as sharply as I could normally.

What happened to you?

Quick hint:





Anyhow, welcome back Risto.



687. Post 2449894 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 12, 2013, 11:01:28 AM
Everyone who holds anything else as investment except bitcoins has diversified to the detriment of their financial interest.

well done. Hope you have managed to keep hold of most of them.

Yes, I haven given away about 2,000,000 and 1,000,000 has been stolen but I still have some.

Sorry for usage of millibitcoin

just fine. I remember your preference for that.
Looks like next up-leg underway as $110 crumbles.


it hardly crumbles

It clearly does.

It will crumble when it crumbles. Still standing ATM.

Anyhow, breaking $110 can be a good sign for a short-term rally to the $120s... But still it's nothing definitive in the sense of "the bull market is on". The bull market will be very likely when we break $135 on the upside, and will be a FACT when $166 falls. Till then, the bears are still ahead.



688. Post 2449975 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: rpietila on June 12, 2013, 09:46:43 AM
Everyone who holds anything else as investment except bitcoins has diversified to the detriment of their financial interest.

well done. Hope you have managed to keep hold of most of them.

Yes, I haven given away about 2,000,000 and 1,000,000 has been stolen but I still have some.

Sorry for usage of millibitcoin

1,000,000 mBTC stolen is quite a sum. $109k at today's exchange rate, probably MUCH more in the future. Do you know how that happened? Any hints of who could be the thief?

Maybe there is a chance to recoup them.

"Giving away" 2,000,000 mBTC sounds pretty crazy too.

Anyway, keep on going with the mBTC thing, sooner or later we will need to start using that for sure. Hope MtGoxfinally starts using that denomination, the psychological factor is important for people, and buying "one coin" for +$100 sounds "too expensive" for the average Joe, even if it's nonsense.



689. Post 2450008 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 12, 2013, 11:25:31 AM
Asks piling up all the way to $110. The sellers will become nervous sooner or later, there are too many coins till $110 and no buying pressure whatsoever. Someone that bought from $100 to $105 has to decide wether to sell at a profit at $108 or panic sell and probably lose money if a seller get tired to wait and dumps as few coins as 700-800, pushing the price down.


I just don't see it in the market depth on Gox. Where are you getting your numbers from?

For example, just looking at the sum of buys and sells within $8 of the current price of 109, I see Asks at 10k and bids at 9k. That has been getting better the last few days.

Now, I'm not saying we don't go down, but that is what the depth is saying (and easily manipulatable I know).

Another thing to consider, on many of our minds, is that 15k order on Sunday that stopped the downward movement. I wonder who would do that as they could have bought in slower and gotten a better price.
Is it going too far to say a lower price of Bitcoin would increase adoption? There has been evidence that a higher price keeps people away. Funny, perhaps some people want to keep the price up for
that reason. We don't know, but something to consider.



Right now we have 9100 coins on the ask side to reach $116.5, and 7925 on the bid say to go to $102.

It's true that the depth is slowly improving, but still volume is too low. I'm not discarding a mini-rally, if $110 is broken there will be some panic buys, but IMO those will be short-term moves. Mid term, I'm seeing a bear market, hinted by the crash to $88 this weeked, which will be confirmed if we crash again and $79 is broken on the downside.




690. Post 2450034 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Well, only 682 coins to reach $110. It looks it will happen. Who's panic buying in here, apart from Adam and everybody who's already all-in? Cheesy






691. Post 2450588 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

+1.5kBTC panic buyed from $110.5 to $112. Who pulled the trigger in here?

I didn't, because....



Wink



692. Post 2452046 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

May this be.... A false breakout?






693. Post 2452411 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Ops




694. Post 2452528 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: StarenseN on June 12, 2013, 04:26:16 PM
but then, do you want to attract the attention of the EU?
What do you mean?









FYI: http://www.eurogendfor.org



695. Post 2452657 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 12, 2013, 04:38:35 PM
adamstgBit, we went past $110... did you panic buy like you said you would?  Smiley

no i just woke up.

i think i will be buying today, tho.

need to do some more TA wishful thinking to reassure myself

Man, we are at $110.00 - BUY BUY BUY!!!

Need any more of that? Cheesy



696. Post 2452759 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 12, 2013, 04:51:05 PM
adamstgBit, we went past $110... did you panic buy like you said you would?  Smiley

no i just woke up.

i think i will be buying today, tho.

need to do some more TA wishful thinking to reassure myself


Just to confirm, you are not willing to bet that we will reach 180 in 13 days like you claimed?

He already said NO.



697. Post 2453004 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Selling pressure slowly building up.




698. Post 2453199 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on June 12, 2013, 05:27:31 PM
Selling pressure slowly building up.

Feels like we are now clinging on to $110 rather than bumping up against it

Those guys who panic bought from $110.5 to $112ish must be in a world of pain right now  Cool



699. Post 2454757 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on June 12, 2013, 07:50:00 PM
I agree. I'm just saying that there was a bait in form of breaking 111 and then even 112 yet nobody seemed to trust it enough to buy in.

Perhaps they already did.


Yeah, that's the saddest part.



700. Post 2455657 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 12, 2013, 07:54:59 PM
Nah there's enough bulls. Only thing is they want 'cheap' coins at sub 80...
so everybody's waiting for further crashing/deflation.
We just need to wait for the impatient to make a move.
some might call this 'consolidaition' but I think most are just waiting for 'cheap' coins
we have to go to at least 'cheap' coins before we go 'up,up,up'

On this forum wanting cheap coins makes you a bear. Everyone is long term bullish here.

What do you expect at bitcointalk.org? Or you are the kind of guy who enjoys hanging around on forums about projects that will fail only for the lulz? Huh



701. Post 2455893 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Richy_T on June 12, 2013, 09:40:58 PM
we all want cheap coins to profit from them. even the most bullish


except the buy-and-holders.

Nah, I'd still buy some cheap coins.

Yep. More coins is never a bad choice



702. Post 2456208 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 12, 2013, 10:00:59 PM
You guys really have to check this twitter feed from Sir-Bits-A-Lot. https://twitter.com/SirBitsALot

He has some great commentary on price manipulation and a video as well. Really really interesting. He is a bull long term but mid to short term (6-12 months) he is a bear.

Video linked here:http://sirbitsalot.wordpress.com/2013/06/11/bitcoin-price-manipulation/

Fun to read but I don't see that much manipulation these days. Price climbing on low volume, not so strange considering we went from $14 to $266 in the first 4 months of 2013, and then we crashed to $50 in a few days. Is expected. There are no wall-games as during the high volatility periods, only small-time trading.



703. Post 2456231 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on June 12, 2013, 10:11:23 PM
So what is bitcoin supposed to do? drop to 1/16th? (uhh... no arrogance inteded  Wink  )
I don't hink we will repeat the 2011 the game has somewhat changed.

Indeed. The 3-year logarithmic trend shows the $12-13 base in Dec-12/Jan-13 to be severely undervalued. $30-$40 was on-trend for that time. So the dip to $50 in April was still on-trend. IMHO seeing $50 again is possible, but anyone wanting to buy again at $30 is dreaming.


I've no idea how low it will go and don't care to guess ... one day at a time.
For now, all I know is that I have 2.5 * the fiat I was going to put into BTC 6 weeks ago, the price is lower, and I don't like the feel of the market right now. It does not seem like a good time to buy. So I will keep doing what I am doing so long as it is profitable.
Seems like a perfectly rational strategy to me.


Kinda lucky to have witnessed BTC in all itself potential while also having the opportunity to buy very cheap while a bubble deflates, right? Cheesy



704. Post 2461809 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on June 13, 2013, 11:21:26 AM
Seems like there has been a raid, and $7.5 million frozen from webmoney (or more precisely, their "guarantor" in Ukraine) today:

Quote
"The authorities have seized a large amount of computer equipment which was used for the system's operation. "Over 60 million Hryvnas ($7.5 million) held in the bank accounts of companies which were part of in the illegal system have been frozen," the ministry said."
http://rapsinews.com/news/20130613/267751619.html
http://www.ukrinform.ua/eng/news/webmoney_funds_blocked_by_revenue_authorities_305119
http://un.ua/eng/article/454477.html

Wonder if there will be any escalation here or if this is a minor issue?

Either way, all these asset seizures are nothing but bullish news for bitcoin.

Indeed. Hopefully people will realize that centralized currencies are sh*t. The only answer is Bitcoin.

Oh boy, I'm really waiting for some agency/government to try to "ban" Bitcoin. But I guess they are not *that* stupid. Wink



705. Post 2461851 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 13, 2013, 11:34:22 AM

Oh boy, I'm really waiting for some agency/government to try to "ban" Bitcoin. But I guess they are not *that* stupid. Wink

You realise that it will negatively affect price, at least in short term?

Probably short term. But not mid-term, or long-term. Everything illegal comes with a premium.

Then, Bitcoin was designed to resist bans. Both the protocol and its creator analyzed a "government ban" situation and prepared for it (why do you think Satoshi is a pseudonym, he always used Tor, and never left traces of who he really was?).

This experiment needs to be fully tested. I don't know if ay government is going to be so stupid to ban Bitcoin, but if they do they will make it stronger, because was designed with that it mind.

Short term price is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Some of us are not here for the quick buck.



706. Post 2461944 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 13, 2013, 11:45:38 AM

Oh boy, I'm really waiting for some agency/government to try to "ban" Bitcoin. But I guess they are not *that* stupid. Wink

You realise that it will negatively affect price, at least in short term?

Probably short term. But not mid-term, or long-term. Everything illegal comes with a premium.

Then, Bitcoin was designed to resist bans. Both the protocol and its creator analyzed a "government ban" situation and prepared for it (why do you think Satoshi is a pseudonym, he always used Tor, and never left traces of who he really was?).

This experiment needs to be fully tested. I don't know if ay government is going to be so stupid to ban Bitcoin, but if they do they will make it stronger, because was designed with that it mind.

Short term price is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Some of us are not here for the quick buck.

But we all know how much was bitcoin when it was used only for illegal purposes and not for speculation like today. I would like to hear your opinion on what will happen with bitcoin if it will be illegal to run a bitcoin exchange? Of course TOR-based exchanges could appear, but big money would be gone.

First and foremost, a global ban is unlikely. The most likely scenario is that there would be countries where it would still be legal to run exchanges. And "big money" knows how "offshore banking" works - especially is this "big money" comes from dubious sources. I bet you know that there is a lot of "big money" (or better, HUGE money) in counterfeit pharmaceutical drugs, prostitution, illegal weapons traffic, drugs, etc.

Secondly, Dread Pirate Roberts (SR operator) is a visionary. But new generations of "criminals" will join the pack as soon as they understand BTC. If BTC is banned, they would be even more attracted by it. "Criminal activity" (or black market) is a 1,829 billion per year market. If only a small % of that economic activity goes to BTC the price will skyrocket, and as I said earlier: everything illegal comes with a premium.

Bitcoin has the potential to be HUGE regardless of the official position of Governements.




707. Post 2462418 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 13, 2013, 12:50:26 PM
Sure sounds like there's a lot of SR vendors on this thread, trying to morally justify they are just that  Roll Eyes

Maybe bitcoin economy is mostly SR afterall...

Bitcoin economy = SR + asic companies to mine bitcoins Cheesy

You forget that 99% is pure speculation - like in fiat economy. Or just compare Forex daily turnover ($3.98 trillion) with any other business in the world.

Speculation drives economy in the capitalist system. That's it.



708. Post 2462422 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.



709. Post 2462476 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on June 13, 2013, 12:57:50 PM
In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.

What? Has it reached $300k/mBTC already?

Almost - anyhow, I'm just trolling. You guys know i'm a long term perma-bull Wink



710. Post 2463996 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: rezurect on June 13, 2013, 03:42:41 PM
What happened to Bitcoinity, down for hours?

working for me.

check bitcoinwisdom.com, quite nice too.



711. Post 2468097 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Rampion on June 13, 2013, 12:54:39 PM
In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.

Winter is coming. Polar bears approaching



712. Post 2468293 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 13, 2013, 10:05:29 PM
Ok now we're at 104.
That was really worth it Huh
I guess i will never really understand trading. And that's why i don't do it Smiley

1) market is driven by speculation
2) we just had a phase of parabolic growth, followed by a bubble burst
3) new money stops flow in, old money starts flowing out because of 2.
4) a lot of "bears" are still sitting on big profits, see 2 and 3, and decide to realize those profits

There's nothing to be "known" apart from the above. Thats what you call a bear market after a bubble, This is how markets work. Bubble is not reinflating right away, market interiorizes that, prices needs to correct and adjust before a sustainable growth trend is resumed.

Coin is not hurt, Bitcoin is stronger than ever, there's no need to be in pain. Be grateful that you have the opportunity to buy cheaper coins, if you really understand Bitcoin you will realize you are actually being lucky, as the guys who had the luck to witness Bitcoin potential during the bubble to $32 while increasing their stash during the fall to $1.99.

And as I always say, short term bear doesn't change the big picture bull. Even if BTC goes to $30, that's more than double than in Jan this year. Relax. Zoom out. Bitcoin won't let you down. Just be rational, emotions won't let see you clearly.



713. Post 2468474 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Ultraviolet on June 13, 2013, 10:44:14 PM
People wanting the price to go down so they can buy "cheap coins" are not looking at it correctly. It's all a very relative thing.

$50 coins are exceptionally profitable under the condition wherein the price rebounds, but so are $200 coins if the price skyrockets.

However, $50 coins may bankrupt you if the market never recovers.

You are looking very short term. To win this game you just increase your BTC by all means. And if it go to 0... Well, it was a hell of a ride  Grin



714. Post 2468546 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 13, 2013, 10:50:50 PM
However, $50 coins may bankrupt you if the market never recovers.
2011 survivors know better. Both during the periods of overvaluation and undervaluation.



I guess 2011 survivors learnt precisely to manage their risks better. You have a couple of examples in this thread, cutting risks, enjoying profits and waiting for cheaper coins to re-invest.




715. Post 2468906 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):




716. Post 2468985 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: circuitry on June 13, 2013, 11:50:10 PM


How are the EMA in this one different from the ones at Moody's?

These are different EMAs. 10, 21, 30, 100

Daily candles

And BTW, selling pressure building up.

Good night gentlemen.




717. Post 2471268 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: dexX7 on June 14, 2013, 06:55:31 AM
These dumps always seems to happen at around 5am UK time, I wonder where whoever keeps doing this is based.

its 1AM on the east coast.

someone is purposely trying to bring down price when people are not watching?

Let's say you sell a huge amount of coins. What would happen, if you sell at A) main trading hours or B) at unregular times, like saturday night? Is it more likely to induce a crash at A or B?

1AM east coast = 3PM Beijing

The new wealthy elite of Bitcoin supernodes is Chinese, do not forget that, gentlemen.



718. Post 2471300 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 14, 2013, 07:12:14 AM
adamstgBit, sometimes I wonder if you are just trolling...  Undecided

with selling pressure severely depressed due the mass delusion of a bitcoin depression on the horizon. the rally will cut through all resistance points like a hot knife cutting through soft butter.

180 with 12days

 Cool

You sure you didn't mean 180 in 120 days?


We'd probably be at that point already if our mystery weekend 5am coin dumper hadn't appeared on the scene last month, the price was climbing nicely until then

And that's what makes the whole dumping thing so silly and annoying. It's as if these people don't want Bitcoin to go up.

No, "this people" want to realize massive fiat profits. And there's no easy and quick way to sell +8kBTC in this tiny (bear) market with shallow depth and low volume.

Bitcoin already went up a lot. Let the baby correct.



719. Post 2471503 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: MickeyT2008 on June 14, 2013, 07:44:43 AM
I wonder how much longer this pattern will carry on for, maybe I should just leave a bid on for $2, then ignore BTC for a few months to see if I get it.

And an ask of $10,000 just in case it goes the other way

Fortunately I don't have (can't afford!) enough BTC or fiat in this for it to be a disaster regardless of what happens.

$2 won't happen

Dips are not being too deep, bear is on, but the bottom is closer than some this-is-2011 doomsayers are expecting.



720. Post 2472034 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY BULLISH:


http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/speech/pdf/20130613.pdf

WOW Wink




721. Post 2473414 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Bears on parade




722. Post 2473649 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 14, 2013, 01:19:24 PM
don't you mean
go, Go, GO?

I mean crash to the floor so greedy me can buy cheaply and assume that bubble is over.
Where's your bids? How much are you going to buy? I assume you are all fiat now?

All fiat, I have them proportionally spread out in 30-60 area.
You should move them to 51-80 area, it's very unlikely that we will see below 50.

I strongly believe that bubble requires a capitulation stage, the true panic and fear, it wont happen above 50. But I might be mistaken. I also have my panic buy limit but it is secret  Wink

All true. But Bitcoin is a strange beast.



723. Post 2476152 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: klee on June 14, 2013, 05:47:07 PM
95$ will be a big battle (if reached)....

Reached for sure.



724. Post 2476302 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on June 14, 2013, 06:07:50 PM
95$ will be a big battle (if reached)....

Reached for sure.

Nothing is sure in bitcoinland. We're just flawed mortals who can only watch and hope. Tongue

One thing is for sure ... Jarlo-jaw is on ignore  Cheesy

Long time ago. If nobody was quoting him, then would just be as he did not exist at all Wink



725. Post 2477955 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on June 14, 2013, 09:33:37 PM
Smiley i bought again

Again I'll ask:

Are you all in yet?  Grin
I think the more interesting question is, are you all out?

I cannot even imagine being totally out. Every man needs his untouchable paper wallet. The feeling of being 100% out has to be unbearable even for the biggest bear Cheesy



726. Post 2478160 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 14, 2013, 09:41:33 PM

I cannot even imagine being totally out. Every man needs his untouchable paper wallet. The feeling of being 100% out has to be unbearable even for the biggest bear Cheesy

I guess it is a bit different if you mined. I casually mine LTC (2.5/day) and I don't even care about their price, shorting them etc. The mindset changes completely once you buy virtual currency.

Still I can't bear (LOL) being 100% out. Feels too risky. Infrastructure is fragile and having all the eggs in one basket (fiat on exchanges) seems kinda reckless to me. A paper wallet with some long-term holdings feels good. I expect the price to go down, thus 100% fiat to buy cheaper would be more profitable, but I may be wrong, or Gox may be running fractional reserve and go bust at some point (unlikely, but are you willing to bet your right hand on it? Not worth the risk).

I guess I'm too emotionally attached to my BTC Cheesy



727. Post 2478247 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on June 14, 2013, 10:11:20 PM
How do you deal with capital gains? Ignore it?

I would have some... but I lost most of my private keys in an unfortunate boat accident.
Wow that blows... Sorry to hear that man Undecided

Also, not everyone lives in the US.
Some have special retirement accounts protected from taxation.
Other can deduce borrowed money when it's paid back.
I might have earn them with my business which accept Bitcoin and paid income tax then.

Really, taxation is a complicated game.
And as usual, those with the less money are those who will pay more.
I'm not living in the US either, but about 97% of my BTC value is pure profit. If I sold out now I would have to pay ~30% in capital gains. That would require one hell of a trade to just break even (ok, maybe no biggie if I had balls like you). I could technically ignore reporting it, it's kind of a gray area, but I donno, the tax man would probably eat me alive if I did that.  Huh

Oh well, guess I'm stuck holding, for the longest time.  Cheesy

If you are planning to transfer "for good" significant funds to your personal account to realize fiat denominated profit, it's always better to declare it and pay for it. Not because of some sort of perverted morality, just because you will avoid potential problems in the future.

As Frozenlock said, as usual those with less money are those who pay more. Everything depends on how big are the gains you want to "cash out". If those gains are big enough, you can easily build a structure that will make you save a lot of money. But if they are not, you end up paying more. You "cannot afford" to save on taxes Cheesy



728. Post 2478383 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: ardana123 on June 14, 2013, 10:28:19 PM

I cannot even imagine being totally out. Every man needs his untouchable paper wallet. The feeling of being 100% out has to be unbearable even for the biggest bear Cheesy

I guess it is a bit different if you mined. I casually mine LTC (2.5/day) and I don't even care about their price, shorting them etc. The mindset changes completely once you buy virtual currency.

Still I can't bear (LOL) being 100% out. Feels too risky. Infrastructure is fragile and having all the eggs in one basket (fiat on exchanges) seems kinda reckless to me. A paper wallet with some long-term holdings feels good. I expect the price to go down, thus 100% fiat to buy cheaper would be more profitable, but I may be wrong, or Gox may be running fractional reserve and go bust at some point (unlikely, but are you willing to bet your right hand on it? Not worth the risk).

I guess I'm too emotionally attached to my BTC Cheesy

I'd choose having my money in fiat on one of these exchanges over having my money in BTC... BTC might crash at any given point and fuck you over completely when it catches you off guard. And how exactly would mtgox run fractional reserve, only banks can do that... Given the amount of money that's being traded on Gox (millions), i'd say we're pretty safe... It wouldn't be easy to get away with theft of that magnitude.

Wow, I trust much more my BTC than fiat on an exchange. I'm trading, but I feel more comfortable holding my private keys than trusting a third party with my money. It's pretty much the whole point of Bitcoin. Anyhow, I accept and manage the risks involved in trusting my money to a third party - Gox and Bitstamp for example, and I proceed trying to factor all the risks. Thus, I won't trust all my "BTC money" to a third party, I prefer to keep some savings in BTC no matter what is the exchange rate.

Calle me hard-core believer, geek, rptard, but it's pretty much how it is Cheesy



729. Post 2478495 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: ardana123 on June 14, 2013, 10:53:59 PM

I cannot even imagine being totally out. Every man needs his untouchable paper wallet. The feeling of being 100% out has to be unbearable even for the biggest bear Cheesy

I guess it is a bit different if you mined. I casually mine LTC (2.5/day) and I don't even care about their price, shorting them etc. The mindset changes completely once you buy virtual currency.

Still I can't bear (LOL) being 100% out. Feels too risky. Infrastructure is fragile and having all the eggs in one basket (fiat on exchanges) seems kinda reckless to me. A paper wallet with some long-term holdings feels good. I expect the price to go down, thus 100% fiat to buy cheaper would be more profitable, but I may be wrong, or Gox may be running fractional reserve and go bust at some point (unlikely, but are you willing to bet your right hand on it? Not worth the risk).

I guess I'm too emotionally attached to my BTC Cheesy

I'd choose having my money in fiat on one of these exchanges over having my money in BTC... BTC might crash at any given point and fuck you over completely when it catches you off guard. And how exactly would mtgox run fractional reserve, only banks can do that... Given the amount of money that's being traded on Gox (millions), i'd say we're pretty safe... It wouldn't be easy to get away with theft of that magnitude.

Wow, I trust much more my BTC than fiat on an exchange. I'm trading, but I feel more comfortable holding my private keys than trusting a third party with my money. It's pretty much the whole point of Bitcoin. Anyhow, I accept and manage the risks involved in trusting my money to a third party - Gox and Bitstamp for example, and I proceed trying to factor all the risks. Thus, I won't trust all my "BTC money" to a third party, I prefer to keep some savings in BTC no matter what is the exchange rate.

Calle me hard-core believer, geek, rptard, but it's pretty much how it is Cheesy

The thing is, since these exchanges operate within legal boundaries and the owners are known and probably documented by law enforcement agencies, we are somewhat safeguarded if our fiat were be stolen or abused by the owners of the exchange. There are systems in place in the real world which would combat criminal endeavours to steal our fiat. Bitcoin has none of those. It might all turn to shit tomorrow, that's the harsh truth of it all, and you wouldn't be able to do a damn thing to prevent it. Your coins might even get stolen from the exchange, and you wouldn't be able to do squat. You might be a "bitcoin believer", but i prefer to be realistic about this whole thing, and i think that's the smart thing to do as well instead of putting blind faith into all of this.

Bear is approaching Wink



730. Post 2478721 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 14, 2013, 11:12:35 PM
This recent talk made me think - how many of people in this topic, who hold BTC are at loss from their average entry point?

i would imagine very few people are sitting on a loss


So it's after majority will sit on loss we will be finished with the bubble Smiley

Then it's single digits. And won't happen.

Keep dreaming Wink



731. Post 2478731 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: ardana123 on June 14, 2013, 11:10:45 PM
The thing is, since these exchanges operate within legal boundaries and the owners are known and probably documented by law enforcement agencies, we are somewhat safeguarded if our fiat were be stolen or abused by the owners of the exchange. There are systems in place in the real world which would combat criminal endeavours to steal our fiat. Bitcoin has none of those. It might all turn to shit tomorrow, that's the harsh truth of it all, and you wouldn't be able to do a damn thing to prevent it. Your coins might even get stolen from the exchange, and you wouldn't be able to do squat. You might be a "bitcoin believer", but i prefer to be realistic about this whole thing, and i think that's the smart thing to do as well instead of putting blind faith into all of this.
Most likely situation, if this were to happen: DOJ swoops in, seizes/restrains bank accounts, presses civil case to recover assets... then after several years, account holders get paid pennies on the dollar out of a remission fund. If you feel safe with fiat on the exchanges, don't. (Same goes for BTC, obviously)

Seriously, that fucking sucks. How does anyone feel safe with large funds on these exchanges?

And how does anyone feel safe with large funds on any bank or third party?

But yes, BTC exchanges are even worst.

And that's why a paper wallet is your best friend.



732. Post 2478752 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: momobitcoin on June 14, 2013, 11:27:20 PM
I'm thinking greed will help Bitcoin.

LOL, how can we live in such a fucked up world?



733. Post 2478829 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on June 14, 2013, 11:35:48 PM
I'm thinking greed will help Bitcoin.

LOL, how can we live in such a fucked up world?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWsx1X8PV_A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPl_Y3Qdb7Y

EDIT: Kozi, it looks like I'm more a red+black type of guy, while you like better yellow+black Wink



734. Post 2480625 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 15, 2013, 02:09:50 AM
fuck ya buy those cheap coins!  Cheesy

Pfft, I'm holding out for 8am Sunday morning GMT. Just wait for it...

I'm loading up on S.dice ( it crazy cheap these days, could be cuz they had bad luck last month and so their was no dividend )

Me too. Where are you buying? I'd like to avoid Popescu's shop (mpex)



735. Post 2481770 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 15, 2013, 07:49:05 AM
Can someone explain the large Bid Ask imbalance - I mean it is easy to see but with so many bids (support?) right below the price and so few sells above the current price, shouldn't we be going up?
I've noticed it slowly had been building the last 2 or 3 days (as we went down.)

IAS

Bids are piling up, but price is slowly goes down, which means that more bids are sold into that asks bought. What buyers are doing is slowly moving their bids lower and lower while sellers sell.

There's no rush to buy.



736. Post 2484012 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: 10c on June 15, 2013, 04:34:24 PM

you're a bear now Huh  wtf did they do?   Cry
lol

MtGox can do wire transfer to anywhere in the world including US

people are selling because they are scared

mmm good luck with that.
I made a withdrawal pre bubble burst and have yet to receive funds....
 

I made at least 3 reasonably big withdrawals (5 figures each) post bubble burst and I received the money in 2/3 days. SEPA transfers. In that sense Gox works like a charm for me, I guess that being fully verified and having requested to have the higher limits help?



737. Post 2484386 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.04h):

Quote from: samson on June 15, 2013, 05:28:43 PM
What an incredible rally this was. Moved back to $104 with a powerful volume of ~5k coins.

I can feel the bullish market.  Roll Eyes

A good effort by whoever tried but it failed. Down we go.


Pretty big wall at $96.01, $1M in total. And its money that it was just added to the order book (check blockchained chart), not money already present in it that consolidated at that point.

Interesting times. Much more interesting than in 2011 I'd say.



738. Post 2484456 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: samson on June 15, 2013, 05:36:51 PM
What an incredible rally this was. Moved back to $104 with a powerful volume of ~5k coins.

I can feel the bullish market.  Roll Eyes

A good effort by whoever tried but it failed. Down we go.


Pretty big wall at $96.01, $1M in total. And its money that it was just added to the order book (check blockchained chart), not money already present in it that consolidated at that point.

Interesting times. Much more interesting than in 2011 I'd say.

Walls in bitcoin world have a peculiar tendency to disappear

Yes, looks like it's gone already


I still see $1.03M at $96. And $1M of "new" money was added today to the order book. To give some context, that amount is the total fiat sitting at Bitstamps order book.

It may be a "fake" wall, but lately we have not seen many of those. We'll see. Interesting times nevertheless.



739. Post 2484561 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):


A bullish PPT from a speaker in the bankers congress about Bitcoin and virtual currencies held yesterday: http://globalforumljd.org/docs/events/061413/061413_ppt_kobar.pdf



740. Post 2486035 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on June 15, 2013, 09:25:07 PM
MtGox can do wire transfer to anywhere in the world including US

people are selling because they are scared

mmm good luck with that.
I made a withdrawal pre bubble burst and have yet to receive funds....
 

I made at least 3 reasonably big withdrawals (5 figures each) post bubble burst and I received the money in 2/3 days. SEPA transfers. In that sense Gox works like a charm for me, I guess that being fully verified and having requested to have the higher limits help?

Didn't help me with SEPA and I'm also fully verified.

I don't know why but it's working very fast for me. High 5 figures cashed out in 3 separate withdrawals that came through in 3 days max each one. Last one was initiated last Sunday and arrived on Tuesday. I have to say I have no complaint with Gox on that sense.



741. Post 2491410 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: Richy_T on June 16, 2013, 03:34:06 PM
Maybe they decided to the some vacation. Standard vacation time in Europe *starts* at about double what is typical in the US.

Man, so who is actually paying Rontus and Annina? Might this anonymous payer be a rival Supernode willing to take away from  Risto his nobility titles?

Time for tinfoilhatting, guys



742. Post 2491753 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: niothor on June 16, 2013, 04:36:54 PM
Perhaps rpietila doesn't have a mental illness, but is master at real life trolling.  Wink

Rpietila has a mental illness, and is a master at real life trolling.

Better.

Most important: never ever trust your money to a crazy guy like rpietila. Don't let his delusions of grandeur to fool you. He's a time ticking bomb. Heck, he's the kind of guy that leaves thousands or BTC on an unencrypted wallet stored on a laptop that he keeps in a Sauna. What about that.



743. Post 2491977 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Read carefully:

Quote from: rpietila on June 13, 2013, 07:21:20 PM
Most patients are here willingly, I was asked, whether it is OK that I am unwilling.

Best quote ever



744. Post 2493881 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: rpietila on June 16, 2013, 08:16:20 PM
most people thought I was insane when I went all in on BTC at $3 and quit my job and mined with 50 computers, slept 2 hours a night and trolled this forum 20 hours a day.

Muahahhaah I showed them who is crazy! muahhahahaha~

You remember, not a week before my current developments, I asked an asylum from you. I saw it coming.

Well, I am sure everything is in the hand of God. My entry point was also $3, before the drop to $2.

I very much remember a post in which you said you acquired your stash in October 2012. Now you say 2011?



745. Post 2497999 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: naphto on June 17, 2013, 09:42:52 AM
If all the world uses bitcoin exactly as much as they use gold now, 1 bitcoin will be valued at $300,000.



If ...
If ...
If ...


If I were rich, I would be rich.
Nice, but who cares?


Bitcoin will never ever be close to be used as much as gold is used now.
Come back in real life plz.




746. Post 2498016 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: naphto on June 17, 2013, 09:49:22 AM


I'm fine, thank you, just don't like dumb people Smiley

They were not for you Wink



747. Post 2498153 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: KS on June 17, 2013, 10:03:13 AM
That will probably never happen. BTC would still be a running success if 10-50M people used it daily. What would you reckon the price range would be? 500 to 2500 USD (pro-rata or some other factor might apply?)

You made my day Smiley
I bet you were serious Smiley


I am. His calculation is based on gold, so he simply swaps Bitcoin for gold. Using historical data for gold, rounding errors and whatnot and he obtains a nice round figure of 300.000USD (2013 value) per Bitcoin. But that's only when everyone uses Bitcoin (I'm counting 6 billion people, which might be a little too low). It's quite a simple calculation.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=174620.msg1886147#msg1886147

The problem is whether this can stand the reality test. Maybe his assumptions are wrong etc. Bitcoin is not tied to a physical item, so, unlike gold, it can vanish. Will that risk factor be included in the price? OTOH, you can absolutely store paper wallets. You could thus make Bitcoin banknotes (or IOUs), so the market cap could be multiplied (but then we're right back where we started: a debt ridden system).

Anyway, the whole Bitcoin experience is very interesting.

Man, $300k per BTC this year is just a delusion of a crazy guy. You have to be as dumb as you could possibly get to do not see that Bitcoin's infrastructure is too weak to support that kind of adoption. The blockchain is not technically ready to support that kind of use (block size hard limit, etc.), let's leave apart Gox and the other exchanges managing that kind of "singularity" (LOL) in just a few months from now.

Everybody in here sees the amazing potential of BTC. How it can go to the moon and skrocket very fast. We all see that, you don't need to be a Supernode 1337 trad3r. But the difference between the sane and the crazy guy is the latter loses touch with reality, being blind to hard facts like the very real limits of Bitcoin's infrastructure.

That's why you should never trust your money to a guy like Rpietila, because when he goes nuts he loses sight with reality's knocking on his door. And he may very well end up leaving your BTC's in a Sauna.



748. Post 2498195 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: 10c on June 17, 2013, 10:16:53 AM
Man, $300k per BTC this year is just a delusion of a crazy guy. You have to be as dumb as you could possibly get to do not see that Bitcoin's infrastructure is too weak to support that kind of adoption. The blockchain is not technically ready to support that kind of use (block size hard limit, etc.), let's leave apart Gox and the other exchanges managing that kind of "singularity" (LOL) in just a few months from now.

Everybody in here sees the amazing potential of BTC. How it can go to the moon and skrocket very fast. We all see that, you don't need to be a Supernode 1337 trad3r. But the difference between the sane and the crazy guy is the latter loses touch with reality, being blind to hard facts like the very real limits of Bitcoin's infrastructure.

That's why you should never trust your money to a guy like Rpietila, because when he goes nuts he loses sight with reality's knocking on his door. And he may very well end up leaving your BTC's in a Sauna.

You're spot on with the infrastructure.
Block chain is the easy thing to fix.

True.

EDIT: anyhow, as the block size gets bigger, it will be more difficult to run full nodes on home computers. If the block size is not fixed and it adjust automatically, big miners could just push out small miners creating on purpouse very big blocks. This has been discussed ad nauseam, and there's no easy answer. Higher capacity of transactions per second will inevitably lead to a bigger centralization (only "servers" running full nodes), the point is to reach an equilibrium in which a lot of transactions per second can happen while the average Joe can still run a full node.

Anyhow, what you said is true: blockchain can be fixed quickly and easily to accomodate more transaction per seconds (the negative side of that is a different discussion). What's slower is the enhancement of the trading platforms and other infrastructure (services).



749. Post 2498333 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: KS on June 17, 2013, 10:38:11 AM
That will probably never happen. BTC would still be a running success if 10-50M people used it daily. What would you reckon the price range would be? 500 to 2500 USD (pro-rata or some other factor might apply?)

You made my day Smiley
I bet you were serious Smiley


I am. His calculation is based on gold, so he simply swaps Bitcoin for gold. Using historical data for gold, rounding errors and whatnot and he obtains a nice round figure of 300.000USD (2013 value) per Bitcoin. But that's only when everyone uses Bitcoin (I'm counting 6 billion people, which might be a little too low). It's quite a simple calculation.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=174620.msg1886147#msg1886147

The problem is whether this can stand the reality test. Maybe his assumptions are wrong etc. Bitcoin is not tied to a physical item, so, unlike gold, it can vanish. Will that risk factor be included in the price? OTOH, you can absolutely store paper wallets. You could thus make Bitcoin banknotes (or IOUs), so the market cap could be multiplied (but then we're right back where we started: a debt ridden system).

Anyway, the whole Bitcoin experience is very interesting.

Man, $300k per BTC this year is just a delusion of a crazy guy. You have to be as dumb as you could possibly get to do not see that Bitcoin's infrastructure is too weak to support that kind of adoption. The blockchain is not technically ready to support that kind of use (block size hard limit, etc.), let's leave apart Gox and the other exchanges managing that kind of "singularity" (LOL) in just a few months from now.

Everybody in here sees the amazing potential of BTC. How it can go to the moon and skrocket very fast. We all see that, you don't need to be a Supernode 1337 trad3r. But the difference between the sane and the crazy guy is the latter loses touch with reality, being blind to hard facts like the very real limits of Bitcoin's infrastructure.

That's why you should never trust your money to a guy like Rpietila, because when he goes nuts he loses sight with reality's knocking on his door. And he may very well end up leaving your BTC's in a Sauna.

This is not about the Bitcoin reaching 300K this year. It's the simple evaluation of his reasoning to get to the 300K figure in 2013-valued US Dollars (so the 300K might become 310K in 2014 USD with inflation, etc). He's basically postulating that if everyone were to use Bitcoin, it's value would reach 300K. He gets to that number by estimating the average number of Bitcoins each person would have and equates that with the average gold weight that everyone uses (historical data 1913-2013). He uses the average wage for a skilled worker (in the "West") as the basis of his price verification.

Even if the number is totally wrong, his math looks alright and his reasoning has some merit. I do find it ironic that he turns Bitcoin on its head by making it the new gold though (the basis for the old monetary system).

The math is not wrong, but the assumptions are. Before that kind of adoption many things have to improve, and he is just forgetting about all that, blinded by his delusions of grandeur.

If my grandmother had wheels and an engine, she would be a motorcycle. But there's no way to implant wheels+engine on a grandma, unless you give her a wheelchair, which does not make her a living motorcycle but a poor disabled woman.

I don't know if you are getting the metaphor, I admit it was a long shot Cheesy



750. Post 2498407 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: dexX7 on June 17, 2013, 10:16:32 AM

Each time the sum of bids and asks on the book was lower than the price, we could observe a local price minimum and trend reversal following.



Do you realize that those variables ( bid sum/ask sum & price; bid sum & ask sum) are displayed in those charts taking into account their own relative highest and lowest points in a given timeframe, and thus them intersecting on the chart is just arbitrary and meaningless, right?

You should pay attention to the values, but the fact they cross on the chart has no meaning at all.

EDIT: I will try to explain you visually the example. In the chart you posted, the bid sum and ask sum crossed for a moment at the beginning of June, and nowadays are very far away one from each other. Now look at the 15 days timeframe, they are crossing each other consistently for the last days. Thus, the fact they intersect or not depends on how they are charted, it will depend on their relative values on an arbitrary timeframe, and therefore is 100% meaningless.




751. Post 2498729 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: Kupsi on June 17, 2013, 11:49:00 AM
Do you realize that those variables ( bid sum/ask sum & price; bid sum & ask sum) are displayed in those charts taking into account their own relative highest and lowest points in a given timeframe, and thus them intersecting on the chart is just arbitrary and meaningless, right?

In the "Bid sum/Ask skum & Price" chart, both graphs are in USD/BTC and both graphs use the same scale. That's not arbitrary and meaningless.

Sure, I typed too fast and I incorrectly included the Bid sum/Ask sum & price chart. But the fact that the bid sum and ask sum crosses on a chart is 100% arbitrary and meaningless, do you agree?



752. Post 2500323 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Mini-rally time?




753. Post 2503039 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: Odalv on June 17, 2013, 08:42:17 PM
Not necessarily true ... depends on the net position that Plus500 hold, how much risk they take on their book and how much they hedge on Gox or other exchanges if they are net short. Not sure how they deal with net long unless they are able to borrow BTC to short.

I think their business model has error :-). They do not buy or sell bitcoins. You cannot buy/sell bitcoin at plus500 ... only make CFD.

edit: you can after CFD manipulate price easy (if you have enough resources)

YOU cannot buy or sell Bitcoins with them .. it is all CFDs. That does not mean that THEY do not use BTC to hedge when and where they can, and I would be very surprised if they do not

I'm not sure they can DO HEDGE (they do not have enough bitcoins) ... beacause they do not know how much I'll short at their platform (and they need 4x more ... if I'll try short 12M btc then they will need 48M.  ... and there are only 12M existing ).

The fact is that shorting with leverage crap is a motherfucking scam. It's just gambling in its purest form, but they are gambling with customers money - if they lose big time and go bust, it's their customers who are left holding the bag. The managers who drive the business are just swimming in money pools and are the same scammers doing the very same tricks that trigger the financial crisis in the modern world.

Did you know that plus500 is owned by UK banks, did you?



754. Post 2503265 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: Odalv on June 17, 2013, 08:52:17 PM
Not necessarily true ... depends on the net position that Plus500 hold, how much risk they take on their book and how much they hedge on Gox or other exchanges if they are net short. Not sure how they deal with net long unless they are able to borrow BTC to short.

I think their business model has error :-). They do not buy or sell bitcoins. You cannot buy/sell bitcoin at plus500 ... only make CFD.

edit: you can after CFD manipulate price easy (if you have enough resources)

YOU cannot buy or sell Bitcoins with them .. it is all CFDs. That does not mean that THEY do not use BTC to hedge when and where they can, and I would be very surprised if they do not

I'm not sure they can DO HEDGE (they do not have enough bitcoins) ... beacause they do not know how much I'll short at their platform (and they need 4x more ... if I'll try short 12M btc then they will need 48M.  ... and there are only 12M existing ).

The fact is that shorting with leverage crap is a motherfucking scam. It's just gambling in its purest form, but they are gambling with customers money - if they lose big time and go bust, it's their customers who are left holding the bag. The managers who drive the business are just swimming in money pools and are the same scammers doing the very same tricks that trigger the financial crisis in the modern world.

Did you know that plus500 is owned by UK banks, did you?

I only know, it is easy to extract $$$ from plus500 :-) (they do not understand what is bitcoin) Nothing illegal they make bet I'll accept bet ... I'll win bet. Theirs company go down. Somebody makes mistake.

If the company go down (but it won't, because Bitcoin it's still too small) is your money they lose. What you funded in their account and all the gains you did not withdrew. Just like when it's your bank that go bankrupt. All money that it's not under your mattress is gone. The individuals running the business have no risk, it's their customers who are risking their money trusting it to a bunch of white collar gambling scammers

And that's why we have Bitcoin Wink



755. Post 2503348 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on June 17, 2013, 09:03:36 PM
Not necessarily true ... depends on the net position that Plus500 hold, how much risk they take on their book and how much they hedge on Gox or other exchanges if they are net short. Not sure how they deal with net long unless they are able to borrow BTC to short.

I think their business model has error :-). They do not buy or sell bitcoins. You cannot buy/sell bitcoin at plus500 ... only make CFD.

edit: you can after CFD manipulate price easy (if you have enough resources)

YOU cannot buy or sell Bitcoins with them .. it is all CFDs. That does not mean that THEY do not use BTC to hedge when and where they can, and I would be very surprised if they do not

I'm not sure they can DO HEDGE (they do not have enough bitcoins) ... beacause they do not know how much I'll short at their platform (and they need 4x more ... if I'll try short 12M btc then they will need 48M.  ... and there are only 12M existing ).

The fact is that shorting with leverage crap is a motherfucking scam. It's just gambling in its purest form, but they are gambling with customers money - if they lose big time and go bust, it's their customers who are left holding the bag. The managers who drive the business are just swimming in money pools and are the same scammers doing the very same tricks that trigger the financial crisis in the modern world.

Did you know that plus500 is owned by UK banks, did you?

I would not put it that strongly ... they are just feeding a nation/world's addiction to gambling
Yes, I know they are UK based. I feel safer (for now) having fiat with them than in an account in Slovenia, which is rumoured to be on the edge of a banking crisis. When I think its time to actually buy and hold BTC I will use my Bitstamp account. Meanwhile Plus500 is quicker and safer from my experience. No wallet to get hacked and a nice fiat paper trail.
Leverage and shorting is another issue ... really depends on the net house position, on which we can only speculate. Bad risk management, yeah, could get fucked. I would be more worried if they only traded Bitcoin. As it is, they have other revenue streams.

I agree, if they lose and go bust, customers are left holding the bag, but that's the same if an exchange gets hacked/closed down. We are always on the wrong side of these things and always will be . It's part of the game right now.

Sure, if somebody steals your money at the exchange (hacker, operator, government) then you lose it. But BTC exchanges are supposed to be playing an honest game: not creating money out of thin air, not running on fractional reserve, etc. All the CFD and derivative stuff it's a scam. Plus500 is just gambling, and gambling with your money. Just like the bankers that hold our fiat, they are just multiplying it gambling with it over and over through scams with fancy names (CFDs, CDSs, etc.). And when they lose their gamble, all the loss is on you, not on them.



756. Post 2503364 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: Odalv on June 17, 2013, 09:11:35 PM

If the company go down (but it won't, because Bitcoin it's still too small) is your money they lose. What you funded in their account and all the gains you did not withdrew. Just like when it's your bank that go bankrupt. All money that it's not under your mattress is gone. The individuals running the business have no risk, it's their customers who are risking their money trusting it to a bunch of white collar gambling scammers

And that's why we have Bitcoin Wink
+1 ... bitcoin is small (much smaller than ruin an company ... but bitcoin can extracts some money and grows :-) )

True, all that I said is a big picture scenario, Bitcoin is by no means big enough to make a Company like Plus500 to go down. There's really no way.

So enjoy it, my friend Wink



757. Post 2507218 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: BitPirate on June 18, 2013, 08:30:48 AM
Most of you guys are crazy. Every time the price goes down, "all is well". Any bids or upward movement.... "OMG manipulators".

Ha! Thinly veiled attempt at trying to manipulate the market upwards with this post.


Nice try, BitPirate.

LOL.

^^ The price is likely to recover to at least $110 -- the pre-weekend sell-off was in anticipation of a dump that never happened; so now it's time for them to buy back.

OMG you're right. Creating a fake rally and selling into it is such not a good strategy to make money! Cheesy

Rally's been coming for days. Other markets are rallying too. The rise isn't manipulation.






758. Post 2507298 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

It's me or we are having slightly more volume than lately?

Cheesy



759. Post 2509108 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: Miz4r on June 18, 2013, 12:48:53 PM
don't forget the bubble deflation in general

What bubble deflation? You mean this?



Image taken from https://twitter.com/SirBitsALot

That's quite a bearish chart in my book.



760. Post 2509166 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: BitPirate on June 18, 2013, 01:17:49 PM
one fuking eight.
Unfucking belivable.

Why? Pretty inevitable. People only sold off prior to the weekend to get in early in case the Sunday dumper struck again.

That was dumb. People should have sold because a bear is on, not because some mysterious dumper always act on Sundays. That would mean "playing his game".

And BTW, they should have sold at $120-$130.

IMO this mini-rally doesn't change anything. Everything is pretty much the same unless it goes quite higher and it stays higher consistently. Market its too tiny and easily moved by big players to say "the trend has changed" just because we had an 8% spike on lowish volume.



761. Post 2509323 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):




762. Post 2510497 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Wallzilla being chewed ATM, seems legit

Crazy whales buying +$500k in coins at $108 when they could buy below $100? What's up with them? What are they smoking?



763. Post 2510583 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on June 18, 2013, 04:05:14 PM
Wallzilla being chewed ATM, seems legit

Crazy whales buying +$500k in coins at $108 when they could buy below $100? What's up with them? What are they smoking?

They didn't know it was going to go up to $108, and they want Bitcoins.  Hindsight is always 20/20..

But... But... look at the depth... If he pulls that $500k wall the price will slide down till at least $105, probably till $102... Buying $2, $3 or $4 cheaper it's always better, with that volume we are speaking about 100BTC more... Enough to be a supernode!! Wink



764. Post 2510744 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: Jozzaboy on June 18, 2013, 04:17:47 PM
Wallzilla being chewed ATM, seems legit

Crazy whales buying +$500k in coins at $108 when they could buy below $100? What's up with them? What are they smoking?

They didn't know it was going to go up to $108, and they want Bitcoins.  Hindsight is always 20/20..

But... But... look at the depth... If he pulls that $500k wall the price will slide down till at least $105, probably till $102... Buying $2, $3 or $4 cheaper it's always better, with that volume we are speaking about 100BTC more... Enough to be a supernode!! Wink

The greater good. Showing people that this is a good buy in point by staking his own capital. This is market confidence.

Boh. It could be an epic trap. The spike is notable, that's certain, and Wallzilla is really risking his stash to make of this a "real" breakout.



765. Post 2510848 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: KS on June 18, 2013, 04:24:04 PM
Wallzilla being chewed ATM, seems legit

Crazy whales buying +$500k in coins at $108 when they could buy below $100? What's up with them? What are they smoking?

They didn't know it was going to go up to $108, and they want Bitcoins.  Hindsight is always 20/20..

But... But... look at the depth... If he pulls that $500k wall the price will slide down till at least $105, probably till $102... Buying $2, $3 or $4 cheaper it's always better, with that volume we are speaking about 100BTC more... Enough to be a supernode!! Wink

The greater good. Showing people that this is a good buy in point by staking his own capital. This is market confidence.

It's called bait and switch.

I think it's just bait. He might very well be buying his own wall for all we know... a good show of "support".

This is my feeling too. Anyhow, I'm so used to "fake" walls that get immediately pulled as soon as the price get close to them that it kinda puzzles me to see a wall like that being chewed in this kind of slow and bearish market. And that wall was really chewed, not a lot because the volume is low, but it was chewed indeed and it didn't moved a single inch.

Boh... Will see... I'm not buying, that's for sure.



766. Post 2510909 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: kickinyou on June 18, 2013, 04:33:53 PM
The wall have not been touched at the moment , its 4500B in one order that will probebly be pulld if touched .

The wall was touched, I guarantee you that. But was chewed very little, only a few coins were sold into it.



767. Post 2510915 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Well well well, coins coming to the order book, is wallzilla propping up the price preparing for his dump?

The same old story over and over...




768. Post 2511270 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Wall getting chewed... Crash or die!



769. Post 2514756 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: dexX7 on June 18, 2013, 11:29:36 PM
Pretty little cup forming.

The handle is on the wrong side.

The handle is still forming. Smiley

I see no handles, only a movement downwards approaching.

You need to factor that rpietila sold low and bought high earlier today, that has to mean something Cheesy



770. Post 2514871 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: Miz4r on June 18, 2013, 11:46:28 PM
Pretty little cup forming.

The handle is on the wrong side.

The handle is still forming. Smiley

I see no handles, only a movement downwards approaching.

You need to factor that rpietila sold low and bought high earlier today, that has to mean something Cheesy

You only see what your fiat wants you to see. Tongue And rpietila is just being rpietila.

Mmmm... I always have that doubt. That I'm seeing what my position pushes me to see. But it's not always true. I've been all-in while I was feeling bearish and I was predicting crashes. Now I'm significantly "out" because most of my BTC related funds are tight in mining, so they are unavailable for trading but mining is also a way of being "in", while in "trading" funds I'm 50/50.

50% fiat, 50% on a paper wallet I won't touch no matter what happens.



771. Post 2517903 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Tipping point approaching, up or down? I'm betting down, I say $100 will be revisited and possibly broken before breaking $120 on the upside. I give it 70/30 odds.




772. Post 2518070 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 19, 2013, 09:11:52 AM
And then to 50 right?

As I said I believe $50 is going to be the very bottom - and we already touched it the 6th of April. I'd expect revisiting that point during the summer, but nevertheless I acknowledge that every day that passes without breaking $79, this prediction goes further away. Just keep in mind that this game is played mid to long term, and everybody in here is looking at the very short term. I make my investment/trading decisions mid term, most of the times I don't even trade more than once every two weeks. There are times (like two weeks ago) were I feel playful and I do some daytrading, but I treat it much like gamble - as soon as I'm ahead, I quit, and I go back to investing with the vast majority of my position, while I trade only with play money.



773. Post 2519540 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.05h):

A different kind of chart that is getting interesting:




774. Post 2529000 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: San1ty on June 20, 2013, 09:48:53 AM
What happened to the posts counts - have 500 of my posts been deleted ?


Changed to activity apparently

Activity != Post Count

Name:   samson
Posts:   801
Activity:   238

Now ranks are based on activity.

Quote from: theymos on June 18, 2013, 08:44:42 PM
The activity number is determined in this way:
time = number of two-week periods in which you've posted since your registration
activity = min(time * 14, posts)

Activity is updated every 30 minutes.

The new membergroup limits work like this:
GroupRequirement
Brand New0 posts
Newbie(none)
Jr. Member1 post written over 4 hours ago
Memberactivity: 15
Full Memberactivity: 60
Sr. Memberactivity: 200
Hero Memberactivity: 400

I'm not 100% sure that the membergroups work correctly. Tell me if you see any bugs.



775. Post 2530774 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on June 20, 2013, 01:12:16 PM
For excatly that reason, price couldn't go otherside that up, i think, no one is gonna sell now

Flawless logic right there. Grin

Of course that doesn't stop me from selling regardless, getting a better price and hence more fiat to suck out.

Yeah, i know it's flawless logic, excuse me  Grin Grin

But a little buy pressure for at least a few days is expected, at least i expect it. Some people need cash, so they are gonna buy and sell at other exchanges.

After the two weeks i expect the price to go down again thought.

Ony speculating, but more times i'm wrong that right  Tongue

Lemme ask you something: Will you actually wire money to gox under these conditions?
If not: What kind of person do you think would?
If you don't have an answer: What do you think consists of buying "pressure"?

Seriously: I'd have no problem in sending money at Gox RIGHT NOW. I'm european, I made recently 3 consecutive 5 figures withdrawals that arrived in 2/3 days, and the best opportunities present themselves when others are panicking. I have to say that Gox never Goxxed me and always sent me my money in record time. Withdrawals that I execute take MINUTES to go from confirmed to processed, and then as I said 2/3 to receive my money. And the last withdrawal was requested 10 days ago, so no fear on my side.

If I was US based the story might be different, but being EU based I really don't give a sh*t about the recent Dwolla or International Wire Transfer problem.



776. Post 2532042 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: dexX7 on June 20, 2013, 04:12:49 PM
The huge decline in asks.. were they sold or taken off the book?

No, not sold - well, some of them YES, but obviously not so many. I think they were not only taken off the book, a lot of it may have left Gox for good... This kind of news (International wires to USA stop for 2 weeks) scares a lot a certain kind of people (pussies?), and they panic and just take their coins off Gox. Same thing happened when the dwolla thing.

I have to say these are very profitable moments, in the sense that its very easy to predict what panickers will do. I remember when we had the blockchain fork, oh gosh I bought so many coins during that crash... Really, this kind of news and the panickers reaction are a Bitcoin trader best friends



777. Post 2532275 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Kupsi on June 20, 2013, 04:42:15 PM
The huge decline in asks.. were they sold or taken off the book?

No, not sold - well, some of them YES, but obviously not so many.

A decent amount was sold (bought).

http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg1zczsg2013-06-20zeg2013-06-20ztgMzm1g10zm2g25zv

Yes, we had nice volume. With a quick look at the charts you will see that aprox. 50% of the amount that vanished was bought - and the other 50% was not Wink



778. Post 2540777 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: ardana123 on June 21, 2013, 01:15:36 PM
Can anyone tell me how much mtgox charges for an international wire transfer and a sepa transfer, respectively?

SEPA transfer around 85€ for biggish amounts (high 4 figures or 5 figures). But I really don't know if it Gox charging it, my bank or their bank. I just know that if I withdraw 10,000€ I receive 9,915€.

Never tried 3 figures or low 4 figures withdrawals, I guess it will be less.



779. Post 2540898 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

For once I liked the Gox statement. It looked almost professional, that's some good news Wink



780. Post 2552877 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on June 22, 2013, 09:50:48 PM
Not necessarily ...
Depends upon Bitpay's risk appetite and free cash-flow
They could quite easily play the arbitrage game if they wish, taking in BTC at the Bitstamp bid, selling at Gox and waiting it out.

In reality I think that their own business will suffer most as some people will not want to take an 8% haircut and will simply not use the service while this discrepancy exists
Depends so much on how the situation evolves and if MtGox can maintain client confidence in the interim

No idea how much volume they do, but given the size of the Bitcoin economy relative to the speculative turnover, I cannot imagine it is very much

It's peanuts. Bit pay has a joke volume. But still, Gox needs to pull his shit together or die. Hope Mark wakes up and go for a tour to find a fancy wall street company to buy his shop.



781. Post 2553148 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on June 22, 2013, 11:02:57 PM
In march they processed over $5.2M. Mt.Gox's volume in currency for march was around $120M.

Edit:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaJwiXN-8cI  Wink

did that have something to do with ASIC's?

Obviously it did and still that volume is a peanut, a tiny drop in the ocean



782. Post 2556214 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 23, 2013, 09:36:11 AM
Even S3052 has become a Scamcoin supporter. How disappointing. Undecided

Blightcoin certainly won't go to 100 before Bitcoin goes to 2000.

This.



783. Post 2556308 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: rezurect on June 23, 2013, 10:02:52 AM
Offtopic:
Wow, LTC is considered a Scam coin?
Isn't Scrypt Jane an added feature, Designed for ASIC resistance , it makes sure even any disruptive tech doesnt have as significant effect on the network as that is seen on BTC. Since people have put so much of money into ASICs BTC can't adopt Scrypt.



Scrypt is not ASIC resistant at all. FYI: it was supposed to be GPU resistant too, and LTC FPGAs are being developed right now.

That said, LTC was very good to me and made me make a lot of money. But, it has nothing fundamentally different compared to BTC, Scrypt was a nice idea (ASICs are indeed a threat for crypto coins IMO) but a failed one. Theres just no easy way to be ASIC resistant, in fact it may be impossible.

LTC is just a BTC clone, thus calling it a "scam coin" is pretty accurate IMO.




784. Post 2557531 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

I'm guessing LTC price will be very likely plummet as soon as it's traded on Gox, which is what happens as soon as a new scam coin is accepted on exchanges.

Too much profit for all those that invested in LTC in March or earlier. I know I will dump 90% of my LTC holdings shortly before it's traded on Gox, with a x10 profit or higher

I will just keep a few hundreds to dump em Gox for the lulz.



785. Post 2557744 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 23, 2013, 02:13:23 PM
Litecoin's alltime high versus Bitcoin of 0.0449 translates into a valuation of 17.96% of BTC market cap, equating Bitcoin's and Litecoin's eventual 21 million and 84 million supplies.

To reach this high again and maintain it, the market would have to believe that Litecoin will surpass/replace Bitcoin, because even if you grant Litecoin the function of a "backup" or "silver" complement, its valuation would be far lower. Do you really want to place your bets on that?

It's simple, all the scamcoins burn out in an eventual peak that they will never again surpass. They are actual bubbles.

Bring it, though. Pump and dump it HARD. The other scamcoins are already standing in line, they too want a piece of the action: https://support.mtgox.com/forums/20514198-Featured-Requests

Seems Blightcoins are valued at 11.64% of Bitcoin right now. Good luck to anyone holding that bag once the hype subsides. Grin

Petty much agree, bought LTC at roughly 0.0025 and planning to dump 90% of my remaining holdings at aprox. 0.03 or higher, which I guess will happen after Gox announces official ETA.

Already cashed out a big chunk between 0.019 and 0.025, as I said earlier I will just keep a few hundreds of LTC to dump them on Gox regardless of the price, only for the lulz honestly as I expect the best time to dump will be shortly before LTC hits Gox.



786. Post 2557793 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

I would also add that scam coins are pretty profitable, but so far only decided to put significant money in LTC (some thousands of it) and XRPs (a few hundred thousands), tried a little bit of PPC but sold after 2 days with a small profit. It was too prone to continuos pumped ump.

My exit strategy for LTC is very clear (before Gox), on the contrary I'm not sure about XRP, I'm already sitting on a 50% profit and I'm wondering if I should sell now and forget about it or if I should hold it long term and see what happens with Ripple when it exits the beta stage. In any case I'm aware of the fact Ripple is a scam and I may lose everything I've invested in it, in any case it was a gamble with money I definitely can afford to lose. LTC already paid for all the money I could potentially lose with XRP.



787. Post 2558646 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: S3052 on June 23, 2013, 04:39:55 PM
LOL, now the Bitcoin Foundation is a money transmiter bussines? Cease an desist order here -> http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/149335233?access_key=key-2lnhtenm4qb1mydngxac&allow_share=false&show_recommendations=false

What a joke, i wonder how they got that misleading info.

can someone explain why they should be a money transmitter?

Because they got an Avalon batch #1, thus they are mining?

No joke, this is the only activity they "do" that could make them a MSB following the twisted FinCEN regulation, but that reason is so retarded (obviously mining is not THE BF business) that I cannot believe it.



788. Post 2558659 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on June 23, 2013, 04:52:45 PM
LOL, now the Bitcoin Foundation is a money transmiter bussines? Cease an desist order here -> http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/149335233?access_key=key-2lnhtenm4qb1mydngxac&allow_share=false&show_recommendations=false

What a joke, i wonder how they got that misleading info.

can someone explain why they should be a money transmitter?

Because they have created an org that is a central point of contact for money transmission businesses. Remember that whole "centralization is evil" thing? Well they did it anyway.

The central point of contact? Pretty absurdly abstract reason to label them as a MSB



789. Post 2558716 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 23, 2013, 04:04:09 PM
Litecoin's alltime high versus Bitcoin of 0.0449 translates into a valuation of 17.96% of BTC market cap, equating Bitcoin's and Litecoin's eventual 21 million and 84 million supplies.

To reach this high again and maintain it, the market would have to believe that Litecoin will surpass/replace Bitcoin, because even if you grant Litecoin the function of a "backup" or "silver" complement, its valuation would be far lower. Do you really want to place your bets on that?

It's simple, all the scamcoins burn out in an eventual peak that they will never again surpass. They are actual bubbles.

Bring it, though. Pump and dump it HARD. The other scamcoins are already standing in line, they too want a piece of the action: https://support.mtgox.com/forums/20514198-Featured-Requests

Seems Blightcoins are valued at 11.64% of Bitcoin right now. Good luck to anyone holding that bag once the hype subsides. Grin

Petty much agree, bought LTC at roughly 0.0025 and planning to dump 90% of my remaining holdings at aprox. 0.03 or higher, which I guess will happen after Gox announces official ETA.

Already cashed out a big chunk between 0.019 and 0.025, as I said earlier I will just keep a few hundreds of LTC to dump them on Gox regardless of the price, only for the lulz honestly as I expect the best time to dump will be shortly before LTC hits Gox.

Why before it hits Gox?

Because normally all the pump&dump scam coins raise before they hit the exchanges, to fall hard as soon as they hit it. I guess everybody buys on the news this or that scam coin will hit an exchange (normally BTC-e), and then everybody immediately dumps it, as all the "investors" are only after the quick buck...

It *may* be different for LTC and Gox, as this exchange has a huge user base that might never use the their exchanges where LTC is traded, and LTC community is orders of magnitude bigger compared to the other coins, but I'm not going to take that risk with the majority of my holdings... Just with a tiny fraction that I will hold for the lulz. I'm assuming people will buy like crazy when there will be an official ETA to Gox, and in my book that's the best time to sell, when everybody is buying enthusiastically and bullishly.




790. Post 2558725 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: crumbs on June 23, 2013, 05:05:13 PM
LOL, now the Bitcoin Foundation is a money transmiter bussines? Cease an desist order here -> http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/149335233?access_key=key-2lnhtenm4qb1mydngxac&allow_share=false&show_recommendations=false

What a joke, i wonder how they got that misleading info.

can someone explain why they should be a money transmitter?

Because they have created an org that is a central point of contact for money transmission businesses. Remember that whole "centralization is evil" thing? Well they did it anyway.

The central point of contact? Pretty absurdly abstract reason to label them as a MSB

A potent PR move, if nothing else.  

But there is any specific reasons of why they are "transmitting money" in the document? Can't read it all now.



791. Post 2560775 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: dexX7 on June 23, 2013, 09:39:11 PM

Thank you!

FYI: those tickers exist since ages ago. And MtGox has an api for other scam coins apart from LTC. It's a pretty pointless fact, as they already had that ticker 6 months ago.



792. Post 2561045 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: StarenseN on June 23, 2013, 10:11:17 PM
forbes.com/sites/jonmatonis/2013/06/23/bitcoin-foundation-receives-cease-and-desist-order-from-california/

Bye, BTC Foundation

Did you read the article ?

TL;DR - so much fail in California



793. Post 2565016 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

weeeeeeeeee

double digits knock knock knocking at Gox's door



794. Post 2566478 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: bangersdad on June 24, 2013, 02:02:24 PM
Quote from ubi-crypt seems to be even more apt:

Bitcoin and state banking systems are born enemies: only one can survive. If you are imagining that they can peacefully coexist, you are fooling yourself.

Bitcoin exposes the fraud that is state banking. If you think that politicians and bankers will calmly allow it to take over a significant percentage of world financial flows, you’re in denial. States will come after Bitcoin, and hard. They have no choice. Their money can only exist if there are no competitors.


Pretty much this.



795. Post 2567064 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 24, 2013, 02:06:37 PM
weeeeeeeeee

double digits knock knock knocking at Gox's door

Are you extremely happy now?

Man, you really hate me. Anyhow, I can guarantee you that I'm not sad at all.

1) I don't think lower prices "hurt the coin". That's BS. This is a speculative market, bubbles inflate and burst. In 2011 the bottom was 1/16th of the op (bottom=$2; high=$32), and in now way "the coin was hurt". Investors are just waiting a more profitable entry point, they do not get scared by bears.

2) As I wrote many times I see cheaper coins on the way, thus I've sold most of mine between $128 and $109. Still, I have a healthy amount on a paper wallet that I won't touch no matter what, because I love so much this coin I cannot be 100% out of it. And still, I holded till $128 while I predicted a bear market since mid April because "I wanted to believe", but taking into account that I'm in this game to try to get as many coins as I can, it would be kind of retarded for me to hold when I'm convinced that I will be able to buy back cheaper in the future

3) I'm a long term bull, and I personally believe that the sooner this bubble fully deflates, the sooner Bitcoin will resume the sustainable growth trend that will precede the next hype cycle. In other words: I'd prefer a fast crash to the bottom than a multi-month bear market as we are actually having.



796. Post 2567474 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on June 24, 2013, 04:11:56 PM
100$ coins soon  Grin

i'm going place some bids  Smiley




797. Post 2567704 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on June 24, 2013, 04:45:46 PM


Stop quoting him

THIS +10,000

You are making a very poor service to the community quoting a guy that has been ignored by 99% of us. Please join the happy pack and push that red ignore button.



798. Post 2567736 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on June 24, 2013, 04:49:18 PM
Why? He's hilarious. Its like a better version of proudhon.


Mmmm??

Quote
i will close today session under $100

Yeah, there's so much humour in the quote above, so intelligent, so funny, so....

Hilarious? What do you smoke? It's pure crap.



799. Post 2568428 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

ShroomsKit... Tell us the truth... Did you sell yet?

And Nagle... Did you buy, Nagle?




800. Post 2573109 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: molecular on June 25, 2013, 05:40:52 AM

holy crap indeed. It smells funny though because they were even willing to give a reason... who would've thought that?

This Citibank plutocrats are defending their business, they are starting to be afraid of Bitcoin. Cool.

The ones thinking that the bankers would let Bitcoin alone are foolish. Bitcoin is a natural born enemy of the traditional financial system. In the long run, only one can survive.

Let the games begin.



801. Post 2573343 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 25, 2013, 07:17:58 AM
Let the games begin.
Let the Great Dollar Extraction begin. Cheesy

Shall we have a little panic buying first?

Cool to see how the fools who wish to be "legit" and "regulated" see that despite being law abiding citizens their funds are taken hostage, and the only way to move them freely is by converting them to Bitcoins.

Interesting times ahead. Gox losing its dominant position, huge opportunity for alternative exchanges, people realizing that a battle is approaching and that the traditional financial system won't hand over its power without a good fight.

Going to buy popcorn, brb



802. Post 2574275 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 25, 2013, 10:08:11 AM
Those are delusional libertarians who believe in the mantra: they laugh at you, they fight you ,then you win.
Yes Bitcoin network would still exist and mined but valued in the single digits.What a win it would be!


Oh Rampion would cry from happiness if that would happen. 1000's of Bitcoins worth 5 cents each and not a person in the world who would want to touch them anymore. He would call that the war has been won.

I believe "not a person in the world who would want to touch them" is very inaccurate. There are lots of people who don't believe the "legitimacy" delusion, people who is not swallowing the BS they are fed with. People who appreciate the ability to do whatever they want with their money, regardless of what some regulators/policemen/government thugs say.

Are you worried by Bitcoin going to single digits, even sub dollar? I explained many times, with figures, why I believe in the long term Bitcoin will be more expensive than now, even in a global ban scenario. Black market economy is huge, so if your only worry is the exchange rate, I won't worry so much. Of course you will have to learn how to trade it outside the traditional channels in that scenario.

Then, I will say something that may be very impopular in the speculation sub forum: if Bitcoin goes to single digits but it survives, serving as a tool for those that cannot move their money freely in order to bypass unfair regulations, I will be happy. Sure, I would have lost a lot of the value I threw at Bitcoin, which is not negligible - I can tell you I could leave very good during two years with the amount of fiat I invested in BTC. Still, if I'd lose it I wouldn't be starving, and I'm very conscious from the very first moment that this is a super high risk investment. Fiat denominated profit is a nice bonus, but it was never my goal when I decided to participate in this experiment. I very much prefer being free than being rich. For me Bitcoin is a matter of freedom and principles, this is about challenging the rotten financial system, not about getting rich quick. And still, as I said earlier, in the long run I don't see BTC going to sub-dollar unless a) a superior crypto with the same characteristics (trust-free, decentralized) takes over, or b) a fatal flaw in the protocol is discovered.

Let the party begin, I hope you were never so foolish to believe that the people pulling the strings in the financial world would leave something that truly endangers their position alone.



803. Post 2575243 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: Voktar on June 25, 2013, 01:38:44 PM
Hey Adam, you where saying that Bitcoin will reach $180 in 5 bussines days correct?

Well, that is 2nd july, the day of the Bitcoin London conference and i think Max Keiser is going too  Grin -> https://exante.eu/press/news/310/

So it is your secret? If yes, do you really think that the conference hype would put us at $180 or near it? Why so much confidence?  Smiley




804. Post 2575321 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Quote from: molecular on June 25, 2013, 01:56:52 PM
Will you have the guts to do the right thing when the pressure is on? If yes, I applaud and honor you. If not, here are a few cheap excuses to use (after all, who wants to admit conditioning or cowardice):

Without the rule of law, everything would fall apart.
Without regulation, criminals would destroy everything.
Yes, regulation is coercive, but along with it comes a certain amount of public benefit!
I got ripped off, and someone has to fix it!
If I can’t sue someone, they can get away with ripping me off!
We can’t get people to use Bitcoin unless it’s authorized.
We need approval or we will forever remain a tiny market.
A significant number of Bitcoin people will say these things (and others), but the real truth will be that they are scared, or are still hoping to get mega-rich, or just can’t rip the “government is our friend” meme out of their heads. But mostly it will be fear.

We all feel fear of course, but some of us are determined enough to do the right thing, even when we’re afraid.

So, here’s a final tip: If you run into someone who can feel the fear and still do the right thing, don’t let go of them.

you stole that from an old radical: http://www.dgcmagazine.com/the-old-radical-how-bitcoin-is-being-destroyed/ Smiley


The post linked above contains simple and plain truth.

But really I don't get how a lot of people just do not understand.



805. Post 2576885 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Just to add a little bit of spice to this thread, I will leave this epic video titled "Hitler got screwed by Bitcoin weekend dip and is reminiscing about his Bitcoin mining career" for those who are new in here and missed it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4axmD2YvPnA

Lulz guaranteed.



806. Post 2579260 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.06h):

Bears roaring





807. Post 2582438 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Is anybody else seeing a big dump approaching?



808. Post 2582650 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Voodah on June 26, 2013, 08:46:17 AM
Is anybody else seeing a big dump approaching?

Do go on.. tell us more..

I see an artificial raise to $105 this morning, plus a scary depth for Gox standards:

BTC43.25k to $120, the same amount to $85.
BTC17k to $110, the same amount to $96

Then, we have a very important indicator:

Quote from: rpietila on June 18, 2013, 01:32:49 PM
I don't think we see $100 ever again.

The guy is always wrong, thus we will be going to double digits before seeing again $110 almost for sure. Cheesy




809. Post 2582705 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Its coming




810. Post 2582769 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):




811. Post 2583935 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: rpietila on June 26, 2013, 12:13:10 PM
Is there any news from the regulation sector? (Or anywhere?)

Yes, supernodes will be prosecuted and locked up at Guantanamo Bay. The keys of their cells will be flushed down the toilet and no more salads and organic food during the rest of their lives. Only jerky beef.

Those who escape from prosecution will be eventually hit by drones, wherever they hide.



812. Post 2585934 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: barbs on June 26, 2013, 04:39:42 PM
I'm watching walls and activity using http://trading.i286.org one of you posted this and i love this tool, I'm preffering it to Bitcoinity as it doesn't amalgamate orders and it makes great use of a retina display on my mac.

big wall at 104.49 and 104.5, for some reason the waller had 200@104.5 but has since split it up to 104.49 and 104.5 lol.

Not sure what is up with that but walls scare me. always!

big wall? Now 200BTC is a big wall?

Jeez, what about Wallzilla's 20,000BTC walls, then?



813. Post 2586019 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: SGExodus on June 26, 2013, 04:44:04 PM
I see an artificial raise to $105 this morning, plus a scary depth for Gox standards:

BTC43.25k to $120, the same amount to $85.
BTC17k to $110, the same amount to $96


Seems like Some groups (silkroad?) just want bitcoin price to fluctuate within a very tight range.  



I just see the price is desperately holding... Pretty crazy that the US guys cannot withdraw their money from Gox and their only choice is to buy coins to move them to another exchange, the latest news about Citibank rejecting wires coming from Gox its pretty outrageous... This motherfuckers, a PRIVATE company, are entitled to decide to who you may send YOUR money, and from who you can receive YOUR money... Honestly, I see a lot of comments and posts about how "doomed" is Gox, but I haven't seen ANY post complaining about those fuckers, I know that if I had an account at Citibank I would close it for good, they don't get to decide what I do with my fucking money.

BTW, Citibank/Citigroup has always been the evil empire, I will leave one link to internal Citigroup documents that leaked for those of you that missed them:

http://our99angrypercent.wordpress.com/2011/11/27/download-citigroup-plutonomy-memos/




814. Post 2589138 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on June 26, 2013, 07:58:35 PM
I really wish transfer between BTCe and Gox was easier.

Never though I would say this, but I really wish somebody could create Pegcoin, all the advantages of instant, decentralized transfer of bitcoin, but pegged to fiat currency value.  Obviously I prefer something with a limited supply like bitcoin, but for now it would certainly make arbitraging a lot easier...  Probably not a viable idea to implement though (not to mention the legal issues).


Ripple?

I haven't really looked into Ripple decently, but isn't it a lending system? 

Yes, like fiat itself.



815. Post 2592267 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: razibuzouzou on June 27, 2013, 08:08:59 AM
1000, time for something interesting to happen.

IMHO, it may stay the same until Mt Gox makes a statement about the US $ withdrawal situation (hopefully, next week).

Imagine Gox says that all USD withdrawals are indefinitely stopped. I guess we would have quite a lot of panic buying.

In the meanwhile, in the order book...




816. Post 2594068 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 27, 2013, 01:47:00 PM
It means SELL. Cheesy

I would add more: SELL SELL SELL

Cheesy



817. Post 2601778 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Voodah on June 28, 2013, 08:08:43 AM
24 Hour bottom, any guesses?

Me-$89

Around that, say $93. The larger support is around 82 though. Be careful at that 90 level, it can fall through it...

Where do you see the larger support at 82?

Well its pretty clear that around $80ish we will have some real support. Expect a bounce around that level, but be careful with catching falling knives. Sooner or later we will fall below $80ish, the big question is "when" and after "how many bounces". Two months and a half passed after the April, 10th crash, and it looks very much like that the decline will be in fact longer than the 5-months bear we had in 2011. Honestly, I hope BrightAnarchist is not right predicting a multi-year bear market, that would be disheartening, and BTC is so small that just a few big players' moves can reverse the trend.



818. Post 2601853 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Did you guys realized that there are only $511k in Bitstamp's order book?

When the exodus of coins from MtGox started after the Dwolla situation, many in here said that fiat was following too, but that it would have taken time as it slower to move. Well, absolute maximum fiat on Bitstamp after Dwolla was $1.1m, and now is less than half of it. Fiat is really leaving Bitcoin for good, as expected.

To give a little bit of context, the ratio between fiat on Bitstamp and Gox has consistently been 1:20. When we had $1M on Bitstamp, we had aprox. $20M on Gox. Now we have $511k on Bitstamp and $11M on Gox.

Gox is still the leading exchange for a reason. Expect a bear in which you will see much less "Bitcoin is a ponzi" talk compared to 2011, but a lot more "OMG the government thugs are coming after us, seizing all our money and eventually locking us up in Guantanamo".

Anyhow, the negative sentiment needs to be MUCH stronger in order to reach the real bottom, which I still hope it will be $50ish. I won't be surprised by $30-$50, I will be puzzled if we go below $30, and quite disappointed if we go below $20.

Anyhow, fasten your seat belts - its going to be a bumpy ride (gif expected, come on guys!)




819. Post 2601885 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: gandhibt on June 28, 2013, 08:33:30 AM
24 Hour bottom, any guesses?

Me-$89

Around that, say $93. The larger support is around 82 though. Be careful at that 90 level, it can fall through it...

Where do you see the larger support at 82?

Well its pretty clear that around $80ish we will have some real support. Expect a bounce around that level, but be careful with catching falling knives. Sooner or later we will fall below $80ish, the big question is "when" and after "how many bounces". Two months and a half passed after the April, 10th crash, and it looks very much like that the decline will be in fact longer than the 5-months bear we had in 2011. Honestly, I hope BrightAnarchist is not right predicting a multi-year bear market, that would be disheartening, and BTC is so small that just a few big players' moves can reverse the trend.

Based on this?


And to second bold: of course that's not true and you said it yourself, "few big players' moves can reverse the trend." That's far more likely outcome than a multi-year bear market... Are you just trying to create selling pressure with that statement?

First question: yep, based on that. Technicals say there will be support and thus a bounce at $80ish, traders will want to play that in a sort of self-fulfilling profecy, as usual.

Second question: I don't try to create anything with my statements, you need to be a delusional fool to think that a post on these forums can affect the price. I agree that a multi-year bear market feels unlikely, but the cold, technical truth is that it looks we are heading to that. Nevertheless, as I stated this is a very tiny market in which technicals are pretty much useless to predict mid and long term moves, you just need one big player throwing a few millions to the market to completely reverse the trend. Obviously that cannot be predicted, if it happens we will see it just after it happened Wink



820. Post 2602173 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 28, 2013, 09:33:44 AM
If you are not out, get out.

Unless you are prepared to hold for YEARS and willing to lose 100%.

Yeah, the YEARS part has me wondering if I should withdraw the fiat I have on Gox while I wait for the entry point I'm looking for. I'm just not very comfortable having it there for too long. I expected the bottom to be reached during the summer, thus having the fiat on Gox for two/three months didn't bother me, but seeing this bear my be much longer than I expected I have to confess my "withdraw" finger is starting to itch hard. Very hard.



821. Post 2602264 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: gandhibt on June 28, 2013, 09:48:30 AM
If you are not out, get out.

Unless you are prepared to hold for YEARS and willing to lose 100%.

Yeah, the YEARS part has me wondering if I should withdraw the fiat I have on Gox while I wait for the entry point I'm looking for. I'm just not very comfortable having it there for too long. I expected the bottom to be reached during the summer, thus having the fiat on Gox for two/three months didn't bother me, but seeing this bear my be much longer than I expected I have to confess my "withdraw" finger is starting to itch hard. Very hard.
Taxes would hurt a lot?

Mmmm... Yeah.

Quote from: gandhibt on June 28, 2013, 09:48:30 AM
You guys truly think that you can predict, at level that is somehow even remotely likely, that price will stay at <100 $ long?

My bet is that it will stay sub $100 for many months. It staid below $32 (or below $16, to actually correlate $100 to a 2011 bubble level) for more than a year and a half. That could be "very long" or "very short" depending on your timescale. For me that is "very short" from an investment point of view, but "very long" for an active trading point of view.



822. Post 2602310 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: 100x on June 28, 2013, 10:01:16 AM
I don't know why people keep looking at 2011 and tell me "this time it's different".

If this time is different, then it's because it's worse.

Now you are contradicting yourself... The only way for it to be worse would be to go below $15. So you are not a single digit believer, but just slightly higher???  Roll Eyes

I like you a lot more when you post thoughtful comments instead of trollish fear-mongering. But hey however you get your jollies  Cheesy

I guess he says it will be worst because there will be more traps, and the bear market will last longer.



823. Post 2602370 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: gandhibt on June 28, 2013, 10:06:51 AM
If you are not out, get out.

Unless you are prepared to hold for YEARS and willing to lose 100%.

Yeah, the YEARS part has me wondering if I should withdraw the fiat I have on Gox while I wait for the entry point I'm looking for. I'm just not very comfortable having it there for too long. I expected the bottom to be reached during the summer, thus having the fiat on Gox for two/three months didn't bother me, but seeing this bear my be much longer than I expected I have to confess my "withdraw" finger is starting to itch hard. Very hard.
Taxes would hurt a lot?

Mmmm... Yeah.

You guys truly think that you can predict, at level that is somehow even remotely likely, that price will stay at <100 $ long?

My bet is that it will stay sub $100 for many months. It staid below $32 (or below $16, to actually correlate $100 to a 2011 bubble level) for more than a year and a half. That could be "very long" or "very short" depending on your timescale. For me that is "very short" from an investment point of view, but "very long" for an active trading point of view.
Now we had two bubbles. This time bitcoin is bigger, stronger and faster. More people know about it. This will shorten the time from 2. bubble to 3. bubble and it will make the 3. bigger. Trend reversal needs just one big whale and then we go. In these conditions predicting that price will stay low for long is just denialism. It took a lot of time to generate the first bubble.

Glad that you are so sure about it. I think the bolded part is true, but I also believe this is something that works in two ways. In 2011, a lot of people said "OMG, this is a scam", so they exited the market pretty fast. Now a lot of investors said "cool, it crashed, I can buy lower and wait for the next bubble", so there is more buying happening, the price bounces more, and at the end of the day it takes longer for the price to fall consistently. But it falls, like it happens during all bubbles deflations, and some of those investors that bought at $160 will crap their pants when we will reach $80, and will sell. Then it will be the turn of those that bought at $100, etc... People realizes that is stupid to hold on 1 coin if you can sell it and buy back 2 coins.

So, yes - people has more confidence in BTC now, and they are exiting the market in a slower fashion. But nevertheless they are exiting the market. Just check both the volume and the fiat on Gox and Bitstamp order books. Is declining. Fiat is leaving. And there's absolutely no sign for it to be coming back soon.



824. Post 2602396 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: prof7bit on June 28, 2013, 10:13:22 AM
If you are not out, get out.
If its going down then the winning strategy is to buy more. Thats the difference between the winners and the losers. The losers buy high and sell low, the winners do it exactly the other way around.

Agreed that the best time to sell it's not now - it was obviously April, 9th, or if you didn't have the sheer luck to catch the very top, best time was when we bounced to $160ish after the crash to $50.

In any case, you win more by selling now at $100 and buying back lower. Because it will be lower...



825. Post 2602500 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 28, 2013, 10:16:54 AM
If you are not out, get out.
If its going down then the winning strategy is to buy more. Thats the difference between the winners and the losers. The losers buy high and sell low, the winners do it exactly the other way around.
There are many timeframes and many winning strategies. Unless people are ready to lose 100% and hold for YEARS like I said before, I would advise against counter trend strategy.

When the trend reverses up, you will a) have minimized your risk and b) probably have more Bitcoins.

For anyone who doesn't like to trade at all though and wants a Bitcoin position I agree, dollar cost averaging is the way to go.

Dollar cost averaging has been my strategy for long... But still, you need to be able to afford to buy constantly, during the crash. If you have already spent a lot in BTC, you won't average much by spending a little more while it goes down. It's just more effective to sell high, and buy lower.



826. Post 2602577 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Jaroslaw on June 28, 2013, 10:44:19 AM
BIG question: Do mtgox blocked only withdraws, or they blodked deposits too ? Smiley

You should know, as you are trading millions of BTC per day... Or do you do OTC?

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



827. Post 2602890 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):




828. Post 2602969 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 28, 2013, 11:36:22 AM
If you are not out, get out.

Unless you are prepared to hold for YEARS and willing to lose 100%.

Yeah, the YEARS part has me wondering if I should withdraw the fiat I have on Gox while I wait for the entry point I'm looking for. I'm just not very comfortable having it there for too long. I expected the bottom to be reached during the summer, thus having the fiat on Gox for two/three months didn't bother me, but seeing this bear my be much longer than I expected I have to confess my "withdraw" finger is starting to itch hard. Very hard.
Taxes would hurt a lot?

You guys truly think that you can predict, at level that is somehow even remotely likely, that price will stay at <100 $ long? Look around you, does it seem that world is changing fast or superfast? Bitcoin will die or it will go to the moon and it will not take years (it's possible, but not even close to likely).

His predictions are simply completely ridiculous and based on nothing. He's is spreading fud for whatever reason. Probably trying to get the price lower to buy some more coins. Sad.








829. Post 2606233 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: niothor on June 28, 2013, 07:22:07 PM
I cant believe there is no panic after the walls were eaten.

But a 1.5k wall from 93 just got pulled :/

No panic means that people take this fall as something normal.
Which might be even a scarier scenario for the 300k guys Smiley

Of course is normal. It's just following the current trend - > down.



830. Post 2606463 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 28, 2013, 07:47:57 PM
People are realizing that they should probably clean up the bids on the order book and gather their fiat millions while the slippage is good.

At last! But it took them long. Funny thing is that most of bulls in denial will eventually sell at the bottom.



831. Post 2606466 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: ardana123 on June 28, 2013, 07:50:19 PM
the pessimists in this thread are hilarious

who are they? Apart from shroomkit, who appears to be bitter and sad, everybody seems happy and playful.



832. Post 2607256 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 28, 2013, 08:43:29 PM
I don't see any cheap coins yet, not even at Bitstamp.

Right, i expected this answer. Because this is the standard answer i get everytime when i ask that question.

Bitcoin goes down, people here are extremely happy and scream about cheap coins, you ask them how much they bought, they tell you they're not buying yet.

There has been a lot of good advice about the price around here lately. Rampion posted some good information. I was a bit behind him in picking up on it but once I did I posted till no tomorrow the charts and what I saw. I actually called it pretty damn accurately. I just wish I would have gotten out at $130 when I first suspected things and not at $107. Anyway, thanks to Rampion for making me look deeper. One has to separate their feelings
here, at least to a degree.

Anyway, going forward, we've mentioned the resistance levels. Low 90's first, but I would be very very careful there as the 100 barrier is broken and that is a big psychological thing. Next is around $82, roughly. Then I have $68, $60, low $50's, then $20's. But this isn't in stone. You have to watch the volume and see how the price is affecting things on the charts.

I'm super bullish about BTC, like most of us here, but when we see the charts clearly saying down, don't fight the feeling...

I'll sacrifice some profit (though BTC isn't really about that primarily for me), in order to be a bit more certain of getting in at the right time.

Thank you for your word IAS, I also enjoy your posts and I love your enthusiasm, being a Bitcoin enthusiast myself. It comforts me that you find yourself agreeing with me in some occasions, half of the time I'm just having fun and I realize i border line the trolling, but at the end of the day I'm utterly sincere, I enjoy being very open about my feelings while I learn with the analysis and views of the other members in here.

There's some people posting that has a tremendous experience in the market, like Blitz, Adam or Frozenlock (and many more), and while everybody has a different approach, there's a lot to be learnt and enjoyed in the mix of cynical humor, trolling and serious statements that constitute this thread.

Coming back to the market, as you say its just stupid to fight against the trend, we are all Bitcoin bulls and that's why we are investing money, time and passion in it, so lets face the facts and play our cards so we end up with more beloved coins and possibly some fiat profits too Wink



833. Post 2607366 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 28, 2013, 09:26:53 PM
I don't see any cheap coins yet, not even at Bitstamp.

Right, i expected this answer. Because this is the standard answer i get everytime when i ask that question.

Bitcoin goes down, people here are extremely happy and scream about cheap coins, you ask them how much they bought, they tell you they're not buying yet.

There has been a lot of good advice about the price around here lately. Rampion posted some good information. I was a bit behind him in picking up on it but once I did I posted till no tomorrow the charts and what I saw. I actually called it pretty damn accurately. I just wish I would have gotten out at $130 when I first suspected things and not at $107. Anyway, thanks to Rampion for making me look deeper. One has to separate their feelings
here, at least to a degree.

Anyway, going forward, we've mentioned the resistance levels. Low 90's first, but I would be very very careful there as the 100 barrier is broken and that is a big psychological thing. Next is around $82, roughly. Then I have $68, $60, low $50's, then $20's. But this isn't in stone. You have to watch the volume and see how the price is affecting things on the charts.

I'm super bullish about BTC, like most of us here, but when we see the charts clearly saying down, don't fight the feeling...

I'll sacrifice some profit (though BTC isn't really about that primarily for me), in order to be a bit more certain of getting in at the right time.
All the fun is in LTC/XRP right now - anticipation of how high they will go. Not how low like in BTC...
Hate this but true for the moment!

Notice my post about LTC in this thread. I think it is a really valid question and I'd love to hear some responses.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1493.2760

Basically, do you want to invest in LTC while BTC is coming down and it seems LTC is more pegged to BTC than it is to the dollar? If today is any indication, then no, though it is a big down day...
I watch LTC for a lot of time (since it was 0.007$) and I agree that when BTC/USD falls, LTC/BTC goes up but LTC/USD goes down too.
So in times where BTC will probably lose value, like now, it would be wiser to go fiat.
On the other hand XRP since 19 April gained value in BTC and USD terms - so I thought that it is an even better alternative than fiat (if BTC drop in general). But lately XRP too loses in dollar terms when BTC goes down...

XRP has how many BILLIONS of shares? I don't care, but I am not going to invest in a debt based currency. Been there and done that, all of us have. XRP's benefit, from what I have read and heard, is to help reduce attacks on the network by making it costly. That sounds good, but when fiat money is endless I'm not so sure. When BTC guys can't quite grasp XRP and when most people can't quite grasp BTC, I think it's just safe to stay away from XRP. Excuse me for being a Debby Downer but something about XRP gives me a bad feeling. I for sure would use the network to get in and out of BTC, but it SHOULD NOT BE an investment. That is not it's purpose and if they make it that, question it thoroughly...

I have to admit that I have a couple of hundred k's of Cripple's, just as a hedge against my main investment, which is BTC. Also because I really needed to touch it with my hands, extending trust and buying a little "just in case", because while I profoundly dislike the concept I acknowledge its potential as a distributed, p2p version of the actual, flawed but dominant, debt-based financial system. In other words, I hope it fails, but I won't be extremely surprised if it didn't.

Back to current price, I missed the last bounce. I had my highest bid at $91ish, didn't got filled, so I pulled it to try to play the future bounce at $88ish. Dangerous games, but you gotta have fun Wink



834. Post 2607413 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: warpio on June 28, 2013, 09:49:31 PM
Me thinks this is going to start getting exciting again very soon... once the difficulty skyrockets from everybody jumping on board ASIC mining, combined with the hardcore investors holding through the drop to $50, plus all the new investors that will surely follow... bitcoins will start to become MUCH more scarce than ever before.

Well, long term Bitcoin looks extremely exciting. This is why we are throwing money at it while we enjoy it so much, don't we?

Wink



835. Post 2607493 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on June 28, 2013, 09:58:11 PM
For the bulls who have been criticising me, here's a serious post with fundamental analysis I made over two months ago on the bearish outlook (price was in the 130s at the time): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=188829.msg1957530#msg1957530

Maybe that will help you guys understand my way of thinking.

Pretty much agree with your analysis, which I think that can be summed up by saying that after a speculative mania phase the market has to correct and adjust to a supply+demand reality that got distorted during a hype cycle.

I also enjoyed this particular quote, as I have the same feeling:

Quote
The time to buy Bitcoins could be when difficulty begins to deflate again. Admittedly, that could happen much further up if another media hype starts, but the chances in my eyes are relatively small.

And right now, another media hype is nowhere to be seen. IMO, before that we really need an improvement in the infrastructure. During the next media hype, Gox cannot be anymore the leading exchange. Hence, as it happened in 2011, the end of the "gold rush" in mining, represented by a decline in the network hash rate, could be indeed a perfect moment to buy back in.



836. Post 2615173 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Shroomskit, did you sell yet?



837. Post 2615304 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: ardana123 on June 29, 2013, 11:24:10 PM
▼ mtgoxUSD    95.7259
▼ bitstampUSD    89.0500
▼ btceUSD    89.9860

It's interesting that the other exchanges are consistently trading lower than MtGox's low of 92. This has been going on for over a week now, so apparently there is still no efficient way to arbitrage it.

people are waiting to get their money out of gox so they can deposit it on the other exchanges.

But it's only a USD issue, why wouldn't they be taking EUR or YEN?

gox only does usd and euro? besides sepa transfers take like a month on gox

False. I recently requested 3 withdrawals, SEPA, 5 figures each, and they arrived to my account in 2/3 days.

Gox has tens of thousands of customers, if all the SEPA transfers had such delays we would see a shitstorm going on in these forums, while we still have $11M on Gox order book and trading goes on despite the low volume. Following my own personal experience, the delays are an exception, and I think if they weren't we would see panic, which we are not seeing



838. Post 2617251 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: ardana123 on June 29, 2013, 11:36:43 PM
▼ mtgoxUSD    95.7259
▼ bitstampUSD    89.0500
▼ btceUSD    89.9860

It's interesting that the other exchanges are consistently trading lower than MtGox's low of 92. This has been going on for over a week now, so apparently there is still no efficient way to arbitrage it.

people are waiting to get their money out of gox so they can deposit it on the other exchanges.

But it's only a USD issue, why wouldn't they be taking EUR or YEN?

gox only does usd and euro? besides sepa transfers take like a month on gox

False. I recently requested 3 withdrawals, SEPA, 5 figures each, and they arrived to my account in 2/3 days.

Gox has tens of thousands of customers, if all the SEPA transfers had such delays we would see a shitstorm going on in these forums, while we still have $11M on Gox order book and trading goes on despite the low volume. Following my own personal experience, the delays are an exception, and I think if they weren't we would see panic, which we are not seeing

oh boy, you're so full of shit  Cheesy

Why? I'm sharing with you my own personal experience.



839. Post 2617269 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Voktar on June 30, 2013, 01:32:52 AM

False. I recently requested 3 withdrawals, SEPA, 5 figures each, and they arrived to my account in 2/3 days.

You are a very lucky man then, i'm still waiting after 7 days for a little SEPA transfer (3 figures), and last time they told me i should wait for longer than a month (back in may).

Smallish withdrawals took 7/10 days to arrive to my account pre-bubble, whie now it looks like the bigger the withdrawals I request, the quicker they arrive to my account. Funny.

Anyhow, Gox is shitty for trading and its management is amateurish, but I have to say in their defense that they never crapped on me regarding withdrawals. I have no complain in that sense.



840. Post 2617777 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on June 30, 2013, 10:05:29 AM

False. I recently requested 3 withdrawals, SEPA, 5 figures each, and they arrived to my account in 2/3 days.

Gox has tens of thousands of customers, if all the SEPA transfers had such delays we would see a shitstorm going on in these forums, while we still have $11M on Gox order book and trading goes on despite the low volume. Following my own personal experience, the delays are an exception, and I think if they weren't we would see panic, which we are not seeing

oh boy, you're so full of shit  Cheesy

Why? I'm sharing with you my own personal experience.

Then you are a privileged customer, I am already waiting for a month and a half for my last withdrawal, still hasn't arrived.

I wonder why some wires go through so fast, while others not. Puzzling.

BTW, I'm fully verified including notarized docs sent by regular post.



841. Post 2626972 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Looks like bears are getting ready to assault $92.2 and kill it for good, next stop $88. IMO bulls already know they lost the battle for $88, but it may bounce a little.




842. Post 2628076 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

$88 here we come

I missed you so much

As our friend Blitz would say, "The Great Dollar Extraction" is on.



843. Post 2628452 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on July 01, 2013, 06:20:03 PM
$88 here we come

I missed you so much

As our friend Blitz would say, "The Great Dollar Extraction" is on.

Are you getting 88 from the move up (before the bubble)?
Or are you extrapolating somewhere?

My number is 82 but as I've said, I don't know that I play a bounce there.
This could get violent as large holders might want to sell their coins before others.
After all, we are under 100, solidly now...

$88 is a monthly low plus a crucial support level, as its part of the $50->$79->$88 "higher lows" trend.



844. Post 2628463 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 01, 2013, 06:36:30 PM
Employee Costs = 150,000 * 20
Legal = 200,000
ISP / DDOS servivers = 120,000
Rent / Security = 120,000
Servers & Utilities = 100,000
= ~ 3.5 MM per year

150k for their "stellar" employees? Wow... do you own a business? I want to work for you!

That 150k per employee figure is way off, but still its true that a low btc/usd exchange rate has an enormous impact on Gox's financials. Taking into account their history of honesty but profound amateurism, I also wonder how good they scaled during the "success", and how well are they going to handle this rough moments (because for them these are rough moments, that's for sure).



845. Post 2628663 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 01, 2013, 06:53:51 PM
People are getting to understand what "deflationary currency" truly means right now. Cheesy

Yeah, the USD deflating right now Cheesy



846. Post 2628681 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

And there you have a smallish whale trying to reverse the trend... Failing... Poor thing...



847. Post 2628846 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Richy_T on July 01, 2013, 07:21:49 PM
hash rate continues to rise...

bitcoin will probably be able compute  the meaning of the universe soon .

Make sure your towel is handy.

Yeah, there are some plastic covers for the keyboard that do wonders to avoid damage and stickiness

Cheesy



848. Post 2629558 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: seleme on July 01, 2013, 07:47:50 PM
Don't quite agree, bubble brought loads of publicity bitcoin wouldn't get otherwise so it was good thing. Some got burned, some came to stay.

And crash is not problem or correction or whatever we call it, I'm talking about people being happy and pushing for it. Like Blitz for example - moderator on main bitcoin forum, just look at his posts since he sold. He was nowhere to be seen here but last few days can't stop posting same stuff.. If crash is something that is supposed to happen, I really don't think long time Bitcoin backers should publicly be happy about it, it's an awful thing to read by some noob who's considering going into cryptocurrency.

Kinda lame but I guess that's how it is..

First, if you are "happy" or "unhappy" about price going up or down, you are probably being too emotional. You are not happy or unhappy because its 3AM and there is no sun, it is what it is and its not under your control - full stop. Secondly, what you wrote about a downtrend "being bad for the n00bs" is utter bullshit, I hope you don't really believe that crap. When I first learnt about Bitcoin, I read about it. I learnt about previous history, previous bubble, and one of the very first things I understood about Bitcoin is that it is scarce by design, is a commodity-like asset and thus is prone to speculation and wild volatility, especially at this early stage. If you are thinking about investing in Bitcoin and didn't understood that, you should stop and read more before you spend a penny on it. Because if you don't like to invest in such an unstable asset, you should really invest in a different, risk-averse asset, or in a coin with demurrage built in it like frecoin or the likes.

People should learn this: BITCOIN IS PRONE TO BOOM AND BUST CYCLES. Especially at this stage. Its one of its core characteristics. That's why you could buy it for $13 in January, and it was traded at $266 in April. You do not need to be a genius to see that, while au contraire you need to be a delusional fool to believe in the delusional "singularity" crap.

Thirdly, since I was a n00b and entered the Bitcoin market for the first time, I was happy about dips, because they are expected and are just a buy opportunity, because fundamentals remain the same regardless of the exchange rate. Thus, this is an excellent time to learn about the market. I had money in the exchange when the crash from $266 started... And that was very good for me, because I was able to buy much cheaper coins.

About Blitz: he has provided both well reasoned and experienced insights, you are not paying attention if you are just reading the occasional "trolling". Which, I have to admit I also enjoy, because I find it has an entertaining sense of humour. I admit I also enjoy Adam's "bullish trolling", but I guess this is a more popular statement, as what people seems to not tolerate well is bearish analysis, that seems to trigger massive amounts of butthurt.



849. Post 2629571 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 01, 2013, 08:23:41 PM
What some of you guys need to understand is that your stance bullish/bearish can diverge on different timeframes. It's not "us" vs. "them", this isn't soccer or war.

If you don't care about neither the short nor the mid term trend (say, months ahead), then quite honestly you shouldn't even be reading the speculation forum because it will only serve to distract and distress you when the shorter term trend diverges. If it's not fun, what's the point?

This is also true, you have been a bull many times in the past, and in fact you confronted the real "FUD spreaders" (Nagle? Cheesy) in epic battles

I guess people like Shroomskit should dig a bit and learn about the past.



850. Post 2629729 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on July 01, 2013, 08:48:30 PM
Don't quite agree, bubble brought loads of publicity bitcoin wouldn't get otherwise so it was good thing. Some got burned, some came to stay.

And crash is not problem or correction or whatever we call it, I'm talking about people being happy and pushing for it. Like Blitz for example - moderator on main bitcoin forum, just look at his posts since he sold. He was nowhere to be seen here but last few days can't stop posting same stuff.. If crash is something that is supposed to happen, I really don't think long time Bitcoin backers should publicly be happy about it, it's an awful thing to read by some noob who's considering going into cryptocurrency.

Kinda lame but I guess that's how it is..

First, if you are "happy" or "unhappy" about price going up or down, you are probably being too emotional. You are not happy or unhappy because its 3AM and there is no sun, it is what it is and its not under your control - full stop. Secondly, what you wrote about a downtrend "being bad for the n00bs" is utter bullshit, I hope you don't really believe that crap. When I first learnt about Bitcoin, I read about it. I learnt about previous history, previous bubble, and one of the very first things I understood about Bitcoin is that it is scarce by design, is a commodity-like asset and thus is prone to speculation and wild volatility, especially at this early stage. If you are thinking about investing in Bitcoin and didn't understood that, you should stop and read more before you spend a penny on it. Because if you don't like to invest in such an unstable asset, you should really invest in a different, risk-averse asset, or in a coin with demurrage built in it like frecoin or the likes.

People should learn this: BITCOIN IS PRONE TO BOOM AND BUST CYCLES. Especially at this stage. Its one of its core characteristics. That's why you could buy it for $13 in January, and it was traded at $266 in April. You do not need to be a genius to see that, while au contraire you need to be a delusional fool to believe in the delusional "singularity" crap.

Thirdly, since I was a n00b and entered the Bitcoin market for the first time, I was happy about dips, because they are expected and are just a buy opportunity, because fundamentals remain the same regardless of the exchange rate. Thus, this is an excellent time to learn about the market. I had money in the exchange when the crash from $266 started... And that was very good for me, because I was able to buy much cheaper coins.

About Blitz: he has provided both well reasoned and experienced insights, you are not paying attention if you are just reading the occasional "trolling". Which, I have to admit I also enjoy, because I find it has an entertaining sense of humour. I admit I also enjoy Adam's "bullish trolling", but I guess this is a more popular statement, as what people seems to not tolerate well is bearish analysis, that seems to trigger massive amounts of butthurt.



Bingo.  Key word here is ANALYSIS.  I find random pictures of rocket ships and cats jumping off walls to be equally useless.  Mature investors are willing to discuss both sides of coin as long as see thoughtful analysis put in front of them.  There is money to be made moving up and down for the savy trader.  Only a cheerleader just wants to hear things that make them feel better.

This thread is 70% trolling and cheerleading, and 30% useful analysis. But IMO that mix makes it funny and enjoyable, and the very few completely useless and unbearable trolls (like jaroslaw and Coinseeker) can easily be put on ignore.



851. Post 2629839 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: molecular on July 01, 2013, 09:12:11 PM
What some of you guys need to understand is that your stance bullish/bearish can diverge on different timeframes. It's not "us" vs. "them", this isn't soccer or war.

If you don't care about neither the short nor the mid term trend (say, months ahead), then quite honestly you shouldn't even be reading the speculation forum because it will only serve to distract and distress you when the shorter term trend diverges. If it's not fun, what's the point?

I found it hard in 2011 to accept that the price of Bitcoin, the most important human invention since fire, could go down.

"But, but, it's the future! How can it go down?!"

I learned the hard way that the market doesn't care what you think, nor does it move in straight lines.


This time, I fully embrace the bear in me.  Smiley

maybe you're betting on the wrong horse again. (not saying). reminds me of rock-paper-scissors. Mr. Market is out to screw you psychologically.

If you saw the bear coming since mid April and acted accordingly (selling), you definitely got right the trend and you are now doing well. If by chance the trend reverses right now, you can still buy back at a significant profit, ending up having much more coins than you would have by holding.



852. Post 2630025 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on July 01, 2013, 09:25:49 PM

But I really, really don't like a fud and people repeating themselves in fud many times. It's an insult to my intelligence to see that someone think I should be reminded we're in bearish market and that someone think his fud posting will make me sell if I don't want to.


I don't see where the insult is if you are acting independently using your own intelligence

It is, I hate when someone think I'm stupid. 'cause I'm not  Grin

Who thinks you are stupid ? Let it wash over you dude  Wink

Thing is, most people here own Bitcoins, so whenever the price goes down those who value them in fiat terms feel pain. Those who truly value them as long term holdings / as 'number of coins held' should, in theory see it as an opportunity to buy more. Speculators see it as just another move to trade. From this simple analysis, it's pretty clear to me the the negative vibe when we go down is caused by those who feel like they are losing money ... people who claim to be 'all about coins' but in reality are not. They are the ones causing the friction through their own internal conflicts.

To those people I say, GET SAVVY, DO ANALYSIS. LEARN WHO TO LISTEN TO AND HOW TO TRADE IN ORDER TO ACCUMULATE MORE COINS ...DON'T TAKE IT OUT ON THE REST OF US COS JUST YOU AIN'T GETTING RICH QUICK ENOUGH


This! Cheaper coins for everybody, both n00bs and seniors, is nothing to be worried about.  Bubble was completely unsustainable, going back to reality is expected, necessary and healthy.

Fundamentals remain unchanged.

Bitcoin is as sound as solid as it was 6 months ago.

More coins is good for you - everybody greet the opportunity and stop whining! Wink



853. Post 2630062 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

In the meanwhile, fiat on Gox's order book reaches new lows since April. Bulls have only $2k-ish BTC guarding $88, that seems a very poor defense line.




854. Post 2630346 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: seleme on July 01, 2013, 09:56:58 PM
Put things in perspective and relax.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l81E7LhWP8w

Even in the bitcoin world, put it in this perspective:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onMq0NHEEpo

4/10/13
Never forget!  Cheesy

Lol, that is amazing video. Price going from 120 to 180 and back in millisecond, lol

Epic day. I spent it trading (or better "watching the sell off", obviously no trading was possible apart from desperately trying to pull bids to place them lower). I saw that happening live, and it was a hell of a ride. I have to admit I enjoyed it. I did not panic sell a single coin (even if I was tempted), but I bought a lot as soon as Gox reopened after the "cooldown". BTW, what a huge Gox fail, I was outraged, such level of amateurism is really beyond me.



855. Post 2630680 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 01, 2013, 10:54:10 PM
Does anybody want to buy 200k paper Bitcoins from the Winklevoss aka Hunt Brothers 2.0? https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1579346/000119312513279830/d562329ds1.htm

Well, that's some serious fun ahead. Cheesy



856. Post 2630734 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Well, $88 failed with no resistance whatsoever. I'm starting to think that the only point left with real support is going to be $50ish



857. Post 2630897 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.07h):

Going through $86 like a hot knife through butter.

Despair and capitulation are unavoidable. The sooner they arrive, the sooner BTC will resume a growth trend.



858. Post 2632962 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on July 01, 2013, 11:38:09 PM


GG, campBx now at $0.00

Someone dumped 2k coins there all the way to 0. Poor guy probably thought there was more depth.

Fuck, really? How can there be someone so retarded? Dumping 2k coins on campbx is like dumping 400k coins at Gox, who is so clueless to that?

The guy that took the price to $0 at campbx just burnt a huge pile of money. And he did a very nice favor to all those that had low bids placed. Imagine how happy is the guy that had a 500 coin bid at $0.5, and never dreamt of it being filled... Well, it was filled Cheesy



859. Post 2632978 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on July 02, 2013, 12:27:28 AM
Would anyone be surprised to learn that the Winklevoss twins were almost solely responsible for pumping Bitcoin from single to triple digits with bid-walls?

No more surprised than to hear that they now want to cash out and realise that they can't  Cheesy

Wouldn't it make more sense to take cash from the IPO to manipulate the price further before cashing out? They might have enough cash and coins to drive the price up and down at will.

Yes, I already mentioned that, it's called propping up and it leads to insane volatility or more specifically flash crashes with crazy rallies in between.

That's what you get when you deal with useless paper assets. JP Morgan has been manipulating the silver market with their ETFs for ages.

It would be fan if the twins started issuing derivative scams like there's no tomorrow, ending up distributing paper Bitcoins worth BTC22M in total Cheesy



860. Post 2633024 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: molecular on July 02, 2013, 06:23:53 AM


doesn't look like it's correct.

It doesn't show up on Bitcoinity neither... Still, look at derpinheimer screenshot, maybe a bug of the tool he was using to follow the market?

Dumping 2k coins on Campbx is too retarded to be true, they would be selling all of them for like $50k, LOL



861. Post 2633787 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Anybody realized the chart the Winklevoss are looking to in the pic below? That seems April, big crash ongoing Cheesy




862. Post 2634173 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Nice sucker rally ongoing, I wonder how many bulls are still in the mood to get burnt trap after trap.



863. Post 2635926 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: nmersulypnem on July 02, 2013, 02:44:51 PM
This will make it possible for investors who don't dare to (or can't) hold BTC or deal with "shady exchanges" to purchase and invest in bitcoin the most legitime way. If I understand this right, the winklevoss twins are essentially selling their bitcoins to an audience which normally wouldn't buy bitcoin. So all those coins sold to this group, means there are now less coins on the market. As new shares are issued and the winklevoss sells out, they will accumelate new USD which they can use to purchase back their original holdings and additional bitcoins.

It looks like a very bullish sign to me. The biggest concern is that it would probably take months or years to be approved by the regulators (if ever).

BTC doesn't need more speculators.  Speculators dump coins in panic the moment the market looks bad.  We need a fucking proper bitcoin economy that isn't based off the sale of drugs.

Well, keep dreaming. Bitcoin is more a store of value and a commodity-like, speculative asset.

Bitcoin is unbeatable at something: it cannot be seized, it cannot be intercepted, is pseudo-anonymous. A service like Silk Road couldn't exist without it. Now tell me, what kind of other service couldn't exist without Bitcoin?

For a lot of day-by-day uses, Paypal (and Credit Cards) do a good job. For Silk Road, they don't. And there you have a real crypto-currency killer app. Without it, that business model is not viable.

Still, the "real economy" surrounding precious metals is minuscule compared to their role as store of value/speculative assets. If Bitcoin succeeds, count on it playing a similar role, being its store of value/speculative use much more relevant that its "real economy" applications.



864. Post 2635956 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 02, 2013, 03:06:48 PM
Quote
it's an IQ test. Bitcoin is anonymous, untaxed (for now) and quite liquid in and of its own right despite all the complexities of a cryptocurrency. A bitcoin ETF is taxed, has fees, may or may not be liquid at all. So, this is really a test: do you want to facilitate the exit of the Winkelvii from an investment at inflated levels which they will soon be taxed upon or do you want to sit this hand out?

http://www.businessinsider.com/one-paragraph-that-totally-destroys-the-winklevoss-bitcoin-etf-2013-7

 Cheesy

Quote
Someone on one of Team Macro Man's chats recently described this ETF as a Rorschach test of what people think of digital currencies. That is utterly wrong: it's an IQ test. Bitcoin is anonymous, untaxed (for now) and quite liquid in and of its own right despite all the complexities of a cryptocurrency. A bitcoin ETF is taxed, has fees, may or may not be liquid at all. So, this is really a test: do you want to facilitate the exit of the Winkelvii from an investment at inflated levels which they will soon be taxed upon or do you want to sit this hand out?

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/one-paragraph-that-totally-destroys-the-winklevoss-bitcoin-etf-2013-7#ixzz2XtwpGV9s

So much truth in the quote above Cheesy



865. Post 2642731 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

I can feel the dump approaching...






866. Post 2647140 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Smallish BID filled at 62ish EUR, sold at 63.9x, +1% profit and now no more catching knives till the '$70s.

The bears in here are so bullish that love to see how their dirty fiat can buy more coins for them, day after day.

We may be coming out from the "return to normal"/denial phase to slowly entering fear. I can start to smell it. People believing (or should we say hoping?) the Winkletards S-1 will take BTC to da moon. Over emotionality on reddit and these subforums. Noobs flaming bears. Noobs starting threads about how they bought over $100 and "will hold forever".

Those guys are usually those that panic sell when they see their investment decimated, and that's usually the very bottom. They will hold a little more and they will be deluded by each and every bull trap.



867. Post 2647183 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: ft73 on July 03, 2013, 07:38:26 PM
I'm starting to see bears here as a little dogmatic  Grin
Not a bull myself at the moment, but probably not even a bear ...


If you invested long term, you are obviously bullish long term, and the speculation subforums are kinda useless for you.

If you are trading, its kinda counterproductive being a bull during an obvious bear market. Trading against the trend hurts your portfolio. Basic math.



868. Post 2648346 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

That beautiful moment in which we touch the 200 daily EMA




869. Post 2648367 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on July 03, 2013, 10:04:29 PM
you smell that? panic is in the air  Cool

i buy now.

You really see panic? I didn't see much panic. But I'm expecting it soonish.



870. Post 2648384 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Here we go $79



871. Post 2648733 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

There was no support whatsoever at $79, that's a pretty big wake up call for the "this might be a correction" crew.

I guess we will have some nice action in the $50s, but the more they'll approach the more the doubt will grow in the market subconscious: will it hold?



872. Post 2648821 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Jozzaboy on July 03, 2013, 10:45:05 PM
Man, we are really hosing through the 70s.

Panic/capit detected. I'm looking forward to the bottom.

Still way to go before despair and capitulation.

Be happy, great buying opportunity approaching, more coins for your fiat, that's a lucky event if you see it with the eyes of a true believer.

Plus, Bitcoin needs to be undervalued before a positive cycle can be resumed consistently. Just remember it was traded at $13 in January, and remember the reasons why it skyrocketed in the first place.



873. Post 2648853 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Jozzaboy on July 03, 2013, 10:54:43 PM
Morale is so low that anyone who buys is slandered. My my, bitcoin has changed dramatically in just one month.

No, it didn't change a bit. Seriously.



874. Post 2648869 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Nice trap is expected. Not for the faint of heart.



875. Post 2649004 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: icekiss on July 03, 2013, 11:06:02 PM
Anyone been moving your orders back yet?

I caught the bottom perfectly this time around - my offer got bought at 75.17 (bitstamp, lowest was 75.11).
Now to watch how it develops. Ready to sell again on very short notice...


$78ish seeks an excellent place to sell those coins, now that you still can



876. Post 2649264 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Jozzaboy on July 03, 2013, 11:30:53 PM
"
Oh I'm still holding coins long term, I never said I was selling did I?

But I am going to buy a lot of new coins soon. Grin

Good enough to be emotionally prepared alone.

The thing is that the only thing worse than not selling when the price is going down is selling at the bottom. I don't want to be that sucker. Tongue Also I don't want to deal with the stress of timing the bottom and the chance of missing it, I prefer just stashing my coins and use fresh fiat to go bottom fishing. Much more relaxing. Wink

As you haven't already input 10% of your annual salary this year alone...



Lol jokes, I don't give a fuck....

Buying during a bubble deflation was a poor choice. Acknowledging the mistake and cutting losses is a good choice if your goal is to buy as many coins as possible with your fiat. Being in denial makes the mistake worst.



877. Post 2649319 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: IG0BR0KE on July 03, 2013, 11:51:14 PM
bottom will be $32-$33 and because im in a good day im gonna give you the approx date, july 12-13th

YOUR WELCOME!!!

Too soon. The slide will be longer. There will be at least a couple of epic bull traps in the way down.



878. Post 2651416 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: TradeFortress on July 04, 2013, 02:02:29 AM
The MONSTERS Asicminer is selling their Bitcoin that is the main reasons the price drop!! This guys are centralized miner for their own benefit. Do not support this bunch of Monsters.
Dumbass.

Slightly less than half of ASICMINER is owned by other people.

This.

And ASICminer did very well for all its shareholders. Its an example of flawless management, other Bitcoin related ventures should learn from them.



879. Post 2651496 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

LOL, MtGox mentions "a bumpy road" in their press release, that made me laugh hard.

Anyhow, I guess these are good news for their US customers.

About price action, it's been very fun indeed. Going quicker than i expected and with no support at all at crucial points.

I had a bid at $71ish, it didn't got filled for a few cents, I'm pulling it as I missed the bounce. Next stop, the $60s. Gotta love the cheap coins.

BTW: Shroomskit, did you sell yet?



880. Post 2651526 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on July 04, 2013, 07:16:56 AM
ASICminer did very well for all its shareholders

im kicking myself for not buying in with my friend when it ipo'ed

Don't, at the time there was a grand chance they'd just run with the money and never do anything. Investors who took that risk got compensated.

Well, in February, when they started deploying, their shares were traded at only 0.3BTC. I over negotiated with a couple of members (I wanted to buy at 0.22BTC), and at the end I didnt buy because x3 the IPO price seemed "a tad much" to me.

That was just before the first dividend, but after they deployed the first 6TH/s. in that moment buying was not so risky but still I passed Sad



881. Post 2651542 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Jozzaboy on July 04, 2013, 07:25:41 AM
Time for another short, or is it going to bounce higher?

Europeans are waking up to good news from Gox, expect a short rally.

Really man, do you think especially Europeans or traders in general give a shit about that "news"?

In any case, what will happen is that now US people will hurry to send their coins to Gox in order to exchange them for fiat and try Gox's new "withdrawal skills"



882. Post 2651841 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Too bad my $71ish bid was not filled, I missed a nice and quick profit in the first of the couple epic bull traps we will have before despair and capitulation.

Still, i learnt that playing these traps is risky business, thus there is no point in panic buying if your strategically placed bid did not fill. That would probably lead to a loss, or to a small profit mixed with a lot of suffering. Not worth it.

I learnt its just better to pull that bid and wait for the next strategic point, which IMO will be mid/high $50s. Playing a bounce on the mid $60s may be profitable too, I will try to play it with a smallish amount.

Fun times indeed. Finally fear. Good news, the faster it goes down, the sooner it will go up again. It will be entertaining to see the slaughtering going on in the traps to follow.



883. Post 2652313 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: gandhibt on July 04, 2013, 09:30:03 AM
Why bounce from 55 and 65 but not from 50 and 60?

First big bounce in the $50s is expected to be in the mid or high $50s, too much people wanting in at $50.

Still, depending on how painful are the traps and crashes before that point, confidence that $50 will hold may be very damaged. Just look at how easily all the other crucial support points ($88 and $79) fell.

Personally, two months ago I was ready to bet that $50 was going to be the very bottom. Now, I'm more inclined to think that there is a 70% chance that the bottom will be lower, something between $20 and $32. Just because there is too many people saying $50 is THE bottom, and during a bubble deflation the very bottom is always lower than most think.

Still, I believe that buying BTC at $50 is again a good investment for the long term, regardless of where the very bottom will end up being. And we will have awesome action at that point, that's for sure Wink



884. Post 2652512 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

How is this depth looking?



Bulls need to make this trap epic, so the depth can be replenished for another whale to take its dump. There's really no point in dumping now. The depth on the bid side is too shallow, its almost a joke. Hopefully bulls in denial will help this dead cat to bounce quite higher, replenishing the bid side for the dumper whales.



885. Post 2652560 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on July 04, 2013, 10:17:50 AM
Maybe short at 81 then... it's slowing down.

How about no?

Why not? I'm welcome to both sides of the story.

Do as you like, but shorting is way too dangerous for my taste.

A recovery to 90+ is very possible.

You are right. Shorting bitcoins is crazy shit, you can be a bear and sell waiting for cheaper coins, but shorting is something I'd never do with BTC.

You are also right on the possibility of bouncing back to 90+. But I wouldn't call it "a recovery", I would call it another "epic sucker rally". Or a bull trap.



886. Post 2652595 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: niothor on July 04, 2013, 10:30:14 AM
something weird is happening..
http://blockchain.info/charts/estimated-transaction-volume?timespan=60days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

3 consecutive days of over 300k bitcoins moved , never happend in the last 60 days.
and today volume is at 400k.

somebody is moving large amounts to god knows where

Gox?



887. Post 2652715 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: barbs on July 04, 2013, 10:55:35 AM
What the hell is this rally, why did i not wake up 10 mins later today  Huh

It's not even a proper rally... Already deflating unfortunately.

Still I'd have an extra few hundred $$ now in my account.

would have could have should have , I'm hoping for another opportunity

No prob. Shit happens. My bid at $71ish (54.77€ to be exact) was not filled by cents, so I missed a nice profit on this bounce. But that's life. Bid pulled, there will be lower lows in the future.

Just remember this is always a slower process than we think. Suckers rallies and bull traps are expected.



888. Post 2653492 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on July 04, 2013, 01:26:34 PM
People, you don't get it. Rampion said we need to hit 50 first before we go up. So you can easily sell 100% now like he obviously also did. Unless he's full of shit ofcourse.

You and him both.
Perhaps two sides of the same coin.

I'm no perm-bear, saying the bubble needs to deflate (to $50 or whatever the bottom will be, I have no crystal ball) is just stating the obvious.

If you think that I'm full of shit for believing we had a bubble which is now deflating, then maybe you are in denial of facts, but honestly it didn't seem so by your posts.



889. Post 2653614 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on July 04, 2013, 01:47:27 PM
People, you don't get it. Rampion said we need to hit 50 first before we go up. So you can easily sell 100% now like he obviously also did. Unless he's full of shit ofcourse.

You and him both.
Perhaps two sides of the same coin.

I'm no perm-bear, saying the bubble needs to deflate (to $50 or whatever the bottom will be, I have no crystal ball) is just stating the obvious.

If you think that I'm full of shit for believing we had a bubble which is now deflating, then maybe you are in denial of facts, but honestly it didn't seem so by your posts.

In my opinion you can't say with certainty for extended periods.
I made this thread once to state what I think about it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=189308.0

Agreed, impossible say with certainty for extended periods. I just say that before a positive cycle is resumed the price needs to fully deflate and then enter in a sustainable uptrend. Obviously nobody can predict a 100% certain timeframe, only guesstimate.

But anyhow I don't understand your post about Rhodium, your point is that BTC will behave as Rhodium long term? I think that's BS. I don't deny that the charts look similar, with their two bubbles (good catch BTW), but they are fundamentally different assets. You say they have three properties in common:

Quote
It is very rare, (much) rarer than Gold
It is somewhat of a fringe investment
It is subject to hypes

1) scarcity is relative in Bitcoin, as each BTC can be easily and very conveniently divided in 100.000.000 sub-units, ready to be immediately transferred with a clic. I don't see how its scarcity is comparable to Gold or Rhodium, apart from a fundamental and general aspect: supply is limited inflation is more or less predictable.

2) yes, but for different reasons. Bitcoin is still an experiment in its initial stages.

3) all commodities are subject to hypes

My point is that I don't get what is the "killer similarity" between BTC and Rhodium. Yes, Bitcoin is a "digital commodity". But its "digital" form is not only an adjective, is a very important characteristic that makes Bitcoin different from any physical commodity. It can be easily transfered, transported, hided, divided, etc. Stores of value are needed, they provide an utility, and Bitcoin is a huge improvement in utility over physical stores of value because of its convenience and "digital" characteristics. Plus, you have the blockchain, which is a fascinating, multi-use beast by itself. Then, you have colored coins applications. The possibilities Bitcoins open go well beyond its similarity with physical commodities. I really think that saying that in the long term Bitcoin will probably behave like Rhodium is baseless.



890. Post 2655445 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on July 04, 2013, 05:17:36 PM

Very very cool. I'd like to see how this plays out. Many have said it will be in the 2nd and 3rd world nations where BTC gets traction first.

In my opinion this kind of news is extremely interesting, and while it's neglected by many, its potentially more bullish than any ETF. Underdeveloped counties can play a fundamental role in future currencies and stores of value.

Edit: I agree lately we have only good news. As I like to say: Bitcoin is stronger than ever. But there is still a long way to go (should I remind you that the exchange that controls most of the market is "Magic The Gathering Online Exchange"? Cheesy), and the actual prices were shaken that a speculative bubble that popped. Now is time for speculators to take their profits (or cut their losses), and thus for the hype and price to go down, while serious infrastructure is built and important things happen at a "real economy" pace.



891. Post 2655477 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on July 04, 2013, 07:13:22 PM

Very very cool. I'd like to see how this plays out. Many have said it will be in the 2nd and 3rd world nations where BTC gets traction first.

In my opinion this kind of news is extremely interesting, and while it's neglected by many, its potentially more bullish than any ETF. Underdeveloped counties can play a fundamental role in future currencies and stores of value.

In a sense we need a killer app of some type. This could be the start at least in another country. We only need things to start taking off in one location and then the organic nature of BTC (, developers and the VC's) can take over.
My concern though, with something like this is the volatility of BTC. That is not a problem if you are using Bitpay or the like, but for BTC to work in these countries I would think there needs to
be some form of stability, UNLESS the inflation rate there is more risky than BTC (e.g. - Argentina).

Can you imagine if this "app" takes off AFTER we correct and people in poor nations are locked into something deflationary and rising quite steadily in price?

IAS

Completely agree on the killer app. Right now, the only killer app of Bitcoin is Silk Road. It's genius, but more are needed to reach a next level.



892. Post 2658743 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on July 05, 2013, 06:40:12 AM

Completely agree on the killer app. Right now, the only killer app of Bitcoin is Silk Road. It's genius, but more are needed to reach a next level.

Wow you sure changed in one month, I remember arguing with you about this exact thing.

No, I didn't change anything. We were speaking about regulation. You said that if BTC was banned by the US, it would die and fail miserably. I said that even if it was banned, it would absorb more black market economy activity, which would make BTC grow and its price raise.

Note that I say SR is genius, and we need more killer apps like SR. Business models that couldn't exist without BTC. You mocked SR, to the contrary I consider it genius, and I say BTC needs more and bigger SR's.



893. Post 2658831 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on July 05, 2013, 07:15:56 AM
From a TA point of view, it makes sense to sort of continue where we left off (minus some room up for advancements, adoption, store of value, global economic situation, etc.)
That puts us anywhere from 20's to 50's (and I'd say at the lower range of that BUT we have to consider our advancement and such as stated above.)

Exactly this. It's not only TA, it's also common sense. When price started to skyrocket at $20-30, we had a clear bubble inflation, where people bought a lot and quickly because they hoped the price would raise a lot and very fast. The last weeks before the crash was pure "mania", with market buy orders of +$1M from people that irrationally feared they wouldn't be able to buy again at those prices.

What trigger that? Cyprus? Nah. Just greed, bubble psychology works like that, you want to hop on the train as soon as possible so you make as much money as possible.

Then bubbles pop, and you have the opposite logic. People is in just because the price was going "to da moon", they realize the price is going down so they sell, the sells make the price to go down quickly and trigger panic, which triggers more downwards movement, wash rinse and repeat.

Really no ETF news will change that cycle. All this speculative mania has to deflate for good, all those who bought for the pure quick profit need to sell, and while the user base will for sure have increased because of the bubble media exposure, it's nowhere so big to support the current prices. $20 to $50 is probably spot on as a "real" current value of BTC. During the bubble inflation I always thought that when it popped, logic thing would be for its bottom to be the top of the previous bubble ($32).

Some will call me a "depicable bear" for this opinion, but I think that I was buying Bitcoins at $13 in January, and i don't see how believing in a bottom of $30ish is so negative and bearish. At the end of the day, it's more than double the price we had at the beginning of the year, which makes BTC an excellent investment if you avoid to get caught in the inflation of the bubble.



894. Post 2658838 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on July 05, 2013, 07:21:05 AM

Completely agree on the killer app. Right now, the only killer app of Bitcoin is Silk Road. It's genius, but more are needed to reach a next level.

Wow you sure changed in one month, I remember arguing with you about this exact thing.

No, I didn't change anything. We were speaking about regulation. You said that if BTC was banned by the US, it would die and fail miserably. I said that even if it was banned, it would absorb more black market economy activity, which would make BTC grow and its price raise.

Note that I say SR is genius, and we need more killer apps like SR. Business models that couldn't exist without BTC. You mocked SR, to the contrary I consider it genius, and I say BTC needs more and bigger SR's.

You mistake me for the wrong person. I said that the only use where bitcoin is better than fiat at this point is Silkroad and store of value. I said that bitcoin economy = silkroad + asics + speculation and nothing else.

I don't know how I could argue that because is true. Still, 99% is speculation. ASIC and SR are a drop in the ocean compared to the relevance of speculation in the BTC economy.



895. Post 2659172 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on July 05, 2013, 08:24:12 AM
I don't know how I could argue that because is true. Still, 99% is speculation. ASIC and SR are a drop in the ocean compared to the relevance of speculation in the BTC economy.


The Silk Road talk is so '2011ish. Came on. People sees that there's much more in BTC, besides of the fact that real economy is still reduced and that it's very speculation driven.

This baby needs to grow a little bit, but it's unstoppable.

Mmmm, yes, so what did I change? Bitcoin is not only SR, but SR happens to be its "killer app". In fact, BTC is not driven by SR, but by pure speculation, as I wrote in that old post that was a reply to this:

Quote from: nmersulypnem on June 06, 2013, 10:14:52 PM
there is no VC that is going to put significant amounts of cash into something that is so heavily influenced by illegal activity.  

I stand correct, the SR point is so '2011ish, everybody understands that BTC is not "heavily influenced" by illegal activity, that's a drop in the ocean, what drives BTC is the hope it will be valued higher in the future.



896. Post 2659192 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: niothor on July 05, 2013, 08:34:33 AM
I stand correct, the SR point is so '2011ish, everybody understands that BTC is not "heavily influenced" by illegal activity, that's a drop in the ocean, what drives BTC is the hope it will be valued higher in the future.

Let's use a different word , more suitable Smiley. Greed Smiley

Yeah, I also discussed with you about how "important" was SR in BTC's economy compared to pure speculation, right?

And if I don't remember it wrong we reached the common conclusion that both BTC and fiat economy are driven by speculation, there's no other business comparable to it, correct? Wink



897. Post 2659378 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: niothor on July 05, 2013, 08:45:56 AM
I stand correct, the SR point is so '2011ish, everybody understands that BTC is not "heavily influenced" by illegal activity, that's a drop in the ocean, what drives BTC is the hope it will be valued higher in the future.

Let's use a different word , more suitable Smiley. Greed Smiley

Yeah, I also discussed with you about how "important" was SR in BTC's economy compared to pure speculation, right?

And if I don't remember it wrong we reached the common conclusion that both BTC and fiat economy are driven by speculation, there's no other business comparable to it, correct? Wink

Yeah , too bad SR it's getting affected by the price madness .
I mean , it's normal on bitcointalk to talk all about prices , but recently silkroad has been infected too.
I'm only for two months or so here but on sr forums for far far longer.

And recently people started to change there , I mean common, 20-30 posts about price and even investment when there were 1-2 /month?
Greed can even affect junkies Smiley

You can open 13000 stores or  get 4000 restaurants to accept bitcoins , if there are no buyers cause people are only trading hoping to enlarge their stash , there is no economy.

Well, that's the eternal discussion between keynesian and austrian economists. Keynesians despise a currency like gold (or BTC), because for them money is just a "commonly shared illusion" that serves a very concrete purpose, which is moving the economy through spending.

The worst enemy for Keynesian is deflation (as the one that happened in the USA in the great depression), where prices go down while "the money go up", which leads to hoarding and a halt in the consumer economy (nobody buying today because tomorrow they will be able to buy more, wash rinse and repeat). For a Keynesian, that's the worst possible scenario, one that leads to "the most painful recession".

For the austrian economists, the worst enemy is inflation, as they consider it a way for the Govs/Central Banks to "seize" people savings, which is a quite accurate description of what inflation is. Austrian economists do not see anything wrong with "hoarding", and they call it "saving".

Obviously the Keynesians economists won the battle (for now), and are very proud that their "techniques" (Government spending, inflation, etc.) were used to "heal" most of the recurrent crisis so typical in the capitalist system (expansion -> contraction, wealth spreading -> wealth concentration; wash rinse and repeat).



898. Post 2659471 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on July 05, 2013, 09:04:46 AM
Waking up to see this ...another completely failed rally attempt... I think there might be some panic today
60's on their way soon ... have to say, I didn't think it would happen so quickly
What do you think Rampion and IAS ?

Well, I had a bid at $71ish that wasn't filled for a few cents (unfortunately, the bounce from $72 was very profitable for those who caught it), and I pulled it. Didn't catch it the first time, I won't be trying to catch a falling knife for the second time in the $70s for sure.

I may play a bounce in the $60s, but with a smallish position. Its risky.

I will for sure play the bounce from the $50ish with significant money, that its going to be nice action indeed.

I still see too much denial for the very bottom to be close, but it's also true that these forums are über-bullish by nature (its bitcointalk.org), so I don't really know how good indicator they are.



899. Post 2659669 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Let's see how quick fiat disappears from the order book.



Pre-bubble, fiat on Gox's order book was around $2M. That quickly escalated to $23M, which is a x10 increase on the market depth for the bid side.

We're now at $10M. What will be the "fiat on order book" bottom? I expect something between $4M and $6M, maybe a tad lower during the last few moments of panic once the bottom is finally reached.



900. Post 2660476 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Miz4r on July 05, 2013, 12:53:00 PM
In the long term everything will work out fine, but right now blood has to be shed. Too bad if you stepped in just recently, but I think the most valuable lessons to learn are right now right here and not when it's only up uP UP. I think we may hit $65 today, and then a bounce up into the 70s again.

I'd say that for a n00b, much better to step in NOW that in the first half of the year. Let's assume that everybody is buying little by little, first a smallish amount and then a bigger one, spreading their bids... Let's say rationally and not emotionally.

If you are in this for the long run much better to enter the market during a bubble deflation and being able to have a decent average entry price, that being caught during the speculative mania phase where price doubles every few days.




901. Post 2662219 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

TheKoziTwo, is about time for a 60s gif, hopefully frozenlock customized



902. Post 2662427 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

WTF? We visited $63? Jeez guys, prepare the gif for the $50s



903. Post 2662472 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Dalib on July 05, 2013, 05:51:16 PM
Bitstamp 10 min:  high: 72.56      low: 63.26  Grin Grin Grin


Yep, that was on Bitstamp. The $50s approaching.



904. Post 2662505 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on July 05, 2013, 05:52:44 PM
Frozenlock/Blitz/Rampion right now (seen from ShroomsKits perspective) :


LOL

I have to say that guy inspires me some kind of tenderness, he seems so emotional, so helpless... Its like you need to give him a hug



905. Post 2662520 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on July 05, 2013, 05:57:04 PM
I've placed my bid at $56. Too soon?

Don't think its soon, I placed around that, just to play the bounce. But I'm very doubtful its going to be the bottom. Probably we will bounce a few times from the 50s, and despair and capitulation will take more time to come. We went from $105ish to $66 very very quickly. I guess there will be a "wait and see" period sooner or later.



906. Post 2663241 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Quote from: Kazu on July 05, 2013, 07:13:14 PM
Quickly wiring in some money so I can buy at the bottom.

Still way to go before the very bottom. Summer is still at the beginning. There will be bounces, traps can be long, on low volume... Until another dump cycle begins.



907. Post 2663685 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.08h):

Bought with very little of my stash (5%) at $68ish just to play lucif's game, for pure fun

Let's see how this plays out Wink



908. Post 2664816 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Walsoraj on July 05, 2013, 11:26:30 PM
stop lying: bears.

Now is the time to BUY. Only time for that is when blood is everywhere, like now. Perfect.

I plan to unload mult-million in buys. Larger orders than seen ever before. Keep an eye or two (or three if alien) on moodys.

Join me in bloodbath, help make the grass (green candles) grow.

A bullish Jaroslaw during a bubble deflation, that's going to be hard to perform, man!



909. Post 2666499 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: kickinyou on July 06, 2013, 05:36:13 AM
What i dont understand is the people that are holding ,say 10k B that thay are not cashing out now ?

Even if thay think that we will stay at this price.
Becuse if thay dump 10k now the price will fall realy hard and only profit would thay make.

And if you have over 10k you are probebly a person that are not stupid, i think its just crazy that we dont se a faster and bigger drop . And becuse of that we maby wont hit as hard that we think ,but i will hold
My cash steady for som time now .

No point in selling right now, the order book needs to build some depth, as soon as there will be juicy bids then its time to dump.

We may have another couple of weeks of calm and quietness before the next round of big dumps



910. Post 2667222 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

I'm with you KoziTwo, your strategy is sound and a winner you, its just that its more An investment strategy than a speculative trading one.



911. Post 2674056 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 07, 2013, 09:35:39 AM
I can feel a Winkledump coming. Cheesy

BTW, how many coins do they have?
Over 100k, though in their SEC filing they propose to sell 200k BTC.

Very telling that no bounce is achieved even at current levels. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but bear with me: This thing needs to capitulate on incredible volume and a low <50 before we bottom out for good.

I'll have to bear with you, even if Ibought a little at $68ish to play lucifs game. He missed it in the past, but recently (2013) he have nailed it consistently, plus trading apart I find myself agreeing with him pretty much always when he comments about Bitcoin in general. He deserved it, but I think volume its been low and support weak, thus we are going to the $50s, sooner than in one  month.



912. Post 2676053 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Kazu on July 07, 2013, 07:50:25 PM
But Dead Cat Bounce in 2011 was very large (much bulls believed that they were already at the bottom).






To be fair, we sort of did bounce from $57 to $166, if that can be considered the 'dead cat bounce.'

Think thats more like the 10 to 20 bounce, but of course this bubble isn't an exact replica of the last one.

Oh, ok.

I still think that $57 will be the bottom though.

indeed

to me, this crash is more like a bigger version of the priate40 crash at 16 down to 7
it was very violent a drop, and it went and touched bottom with the first knife
the huge bull trap
the slow slide down
the rebound above the low of the init. crash


now if we only wait a few months, if the pattern hold we be up 1,000%  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Haha

Believe it or not I was way more freaked out by that whole fork / tons of orphan block problem a while back than I am right now. Right now its just the free market being a free market and speculators being speculators. Back then we actually had a threat to bitcoin itself.

Not worried at all during the fork, I bought a lot in fact.



913. Post 2679920 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

200 day EMA (blue line): once support, now resistance




914. Post 2680099 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: w00dy on July 08, 2013, 09:19:26 AM
is there ANY reason why coins today should be worth 20-30% more than yesterday? I don't see any.  Huh

Is there ANY reasons why coins today should be worth 6-fold more than in January?



915. Post 2684383 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Well, who bought to play this bounce?

Bought myself a little at 53€ to follow the old lucif, placed an ask at 65€ to close that position ASAP but it wasn't filled, for now I lowered it at 62€ish because this suckers rally don't give me any confidence at all.




916. Post 2684504 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on July 08, 2013, 08:14:22 PM
Well, who bought to play this bounce?

Bought myself a little at 53€ to follow the old lucif, placed an ask at 65€ to close that position ASAP but it wasn't filled, for now I lowered it at 62€ish because this suckers rally don't give me any confidence at all.



I was fighting with myself to buy at the bottom of that red candle two days ago but I couldn't do it. I would have put a sell order in at 10 above it and it probably would have gotten filled.
I called 3 of the bounces on the way down as well and also didn't play any of them. Think I should start playing with 20% of my fiat...

Oh well, at least I'm happy I got out at 107 ish.

BTW - a little sell off just happened, nice timing...

Well, didn't have the confidence to buy with as much as 20%, much less in reality, only for the lulz...



917. Post 2688783 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on July 09, 2013, 10:30:37 AM
In what way it achieves that?

5340 (?) dust limit.

Thank you this explained everything. So you think that people play less satoshidice because of this limit? I guess this is the main contributor to the transaction volume isn't it.

No. The minimum SD bet is bigger than 5340 satoshis.



918. Post 2689022 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: molecular on July 09, 2013, 11:15:06 AM
Some Tuesdays have proven to be interesting in the past, let's see what today brings. Laying on the beach with a cocktail watching how this wall at 80 gets eaten, could become a nice day Grin

Wall at 80 getting eating? We haven't touched 80 on gox since 26 hours.

What kind of cocktail are we talking about?

LOL, something very strong indeed, I could use a little of that Cheesy



919. Post 2689057 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Well, I think its about time to sell.



920. Post 2689641 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Quote from: barbs on July 09, 2013, 01:17:18 PM
at some point would the bird not get hungry and lean forward... beak to the ground?  Huh

Or shall it fly to da moon??  Cool

I guess it will go up before it goes down. At least I'm putting my money there, let's see how that plays out.



921. Post 2691203 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.09h):

Great. I just closed my position at 60€ish, after having bout at 53€ish. A little more than 10% profit, enough for me during this sucker rally. I might regret it as we may be heading to the mid $80s (which in EUR would be the high 60s), but I just couldn't stand the sucker rally's tension Cheesy



922. Post 2712091 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 12, 2013, 06:37:46 AM
Where is Rampion? I want that kid to sell low and buy high again....



That clown is awefully quiet lately.
I would too if i looked that stupid and most likely in his case lost a shitload of money waiting for 50 to hit.

I would suggest to him leaving his current username and starting a new one because he really is the joke of this thread.

Poor guy.

So arrogant and yet so wrong.

He and our clown moderator Blitz ofcourse.

LOL, you guys are hilarious. Shroomsy, care to explain how you lose money by selling most of your coins at $129 when they are traded at $99 now? If I buy in now I would have 30% more coins I had before selling, plus I made some small profit buying at $68 and selling at $78 (yup, didn't expect such a big bounce).

BTW Shroomsy... Do you still think that a deep crash (because going from $266 to $65 is quite a crash) "hurts the coin" or did you finally realized that's nonsense?



923. Post 2712101 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: vokain on July 12, 2013, 06:47:43 AM
That "prediction" was already invalidated briefly after it was made I remember. I should probably modify it to "No more sustained triple digits in 2013" whereas sustained could refer to either time (maybe 2 weeks?) or volume. I honestly don't see us trading above 100 for anything more than a spike.

Triple digits is a thing of the past.

You just don't give up do you?

He has a bear avatar, it's his identity.

Nothing wrong with being a bear. A moderator who constantly spreads total BS and fud based on nothing, yes that's wrong.
He already looks like a damn joker now but he apparently doesn't care.
He just ignores it and keeps on spreading his fud.

that was my beef against him, since he is a face of this community and represents us. there should be a neutrality rule on part of the staff, especially in the speculation forum. he is a long term bull though.

Long term bull = "Neutral"?

 Huh  Huh  Huh



924. Post 2713460 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: cosmicblue on July 12, 2013, 10:39:39 AM
I can't imagine early adopters trying to bring the price back down though and if they already didn't sell, why do so now?
 Well, because as an early adopter I might hold 50,000 coins in my cold wallet and like to play rollercoaster with about 10,000 coins - play money.

I think you are vastly overestimating the amount of people holding huge amounts such as 50,000 coins. Most of early adopters sold A LOT in 2011. And many sold out for good. So, I think there is only a handful of individuals holding such amounts. Plus, I think there is also quite an overestimation on the amount of "early miners" holding 10s of k's of coins. Again, that was true in 2011, not so much now. In my opinion there are more "Winklevosses" type of investors that hold massive amount of coins, bought in the market, than early miners.

Just check the thread in this subforum, where addresses with massive funds are listed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=249718.0

You will see that there are almost no "newly generated coins" in those addresses (if there are at all, I didn't see any but I didn't research thoroughly). Most of those coins come from purchases, either from individuals, or from MtGox controlled wallets. Plus, an amazing amount of coins come from the "SR mixer", which is something a miner doesn't need to use... Your freshly generated coins go straight to a fresh address, so they are pretty much untraceable (in fact mining is one of the best ways to have BTC's anonymously), while bought coins leave a trace (Gox knows who you are, the "early adopter" that sold you 20,000 coins probably too, etc.)




925. Post 2713703 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: cosmicblue on July 12, 2013, 11:31:07 AM
There is a big difference in holding 300 or 600 coins, guys.
Sure, but if you are 30+ and hold more than 50k coins, you dont care much about speculating. You just lean back and wait a few years  Grin

Plus, the market is still too small to successfully daytrade with big volumes. Sure, doubling 300 coins is not a big deal. Doubling +1,000 coins its not so easy because of the illiquidity of the market, you really have to catch juicy points both to sell and to buy.

In this market its not easy at all to buy and sell frequently significant amounts without being burnt by the mix of high fees+slippage.



926. Post 2734110 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

It looks like the big spike we had earlier today was a big buyer trying to push the price up with little success.

Its seems to me that is a whale trying to start a rally. Given the current market circumstances, there is no need to panic buy such amount of coins, why executing that market order with big slippage if you can just place your bids, or execute smallish orders while ask side builds up?

Of course there are other explanations. It could be a whale who just don't care about losing +$10k in slippage, because his pockets are so very deep. Or just a noob whale that doesn't know how this market works and is afraid to miss the train. Or he may be someone knowing that huge news will hit the world soon and there is no time to buy slowly. Or maybe he doesn't even know how to place bids on Gox, don't noobs always buy their first coins with market orders?

All the above seems unlikely to me. This market is so tiny that an individual with a relatively small amount of cash  (few millions $) can become a market maker. I guess the vast majority of BTC whales never experienced the feeling of being a "whale" on grown up markets, so they like to play. The most likely objective would be to trigger some panic buying that would make $105 fall, which following TA would be a strong trend reversal indicator.

I'm not buying. The whale seems to be running low on ammo. Wait and see...



927. Post 2734917 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: seleme on July 15, 2013, 02:40:53 PM
Lawl bear toss.

Translation?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Bear%20toss



928. Post 2737661 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Loozik on July 15, 2013, 10:07:24 PM
In general, people assume it's more than one person doing the manipulation, that's why I addressed it as a conspiracy. Although there's always the rich lone gunman trope that's not too far off.

Anyways, there's always walls, and many whales are not so bright. Some think they can manipulate the market, but chances are, people will try calling what they think is a bluff. Then there's the genuine whales who places large bid/ask walls in hope that they actually gets quickly filled, for better or for worse, which I think is likely the case here. But some people might think it's a bluff and sell into it.

As for whales with large orders, they think the market will go in a direction, and they want to cause a chain reaction by shifting their weight around. They aren't out to push the market up just a little then sell, they're in it for the more mid-term/long-term, unless they start to panic.

Most whales only place small orders, unless something big is happening.

Whales can't push the price where it doesn't want to go. Whales can't change the overall trend, unless they had millions, and timed everything perfectly, to include the correct wave counts, etc. This would likely be a great loss to them. It's better for them to go with the trend.

Some things are correct, some are not.

There are 3 group of traders (in general):
- plankton traders, who are 100% on the market and are 10% correct
- whale traders, who are (depending on the group) 80 - 100% on the market (they need holidays from time to time) and are 80 correct%
- daddys, who are 1 - 10% on the market and are 90 -99% correct

Whales screw plankton. Whales have knowledge of planktology and apply this knowledge with a use of various tools and actions, e.g. they scare them with walls, they have shills spreading news like ''I see a head and shoulders'', I see a double top'', and what not. Some of these shills even accept donations.

Daddys screw whales (and indirectly plankton; you know whales need to cover losses they suffer from daddys and screw plankton even more). Daddys have knowledge of whaleology.


LOL, you should pass some of that shit you are smoking Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



929. Post 2737975 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Loozik on July 15, 2013, 10:59:51 PM
For me too, thanks.

Please explain. Truth hurts or what? I am puzzled  Smiley

I think he's asking for drugs.

Care to explain?

It looks pretty self explanatory to me:

LOL, you should pass some of that shit you are smoking Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

+420

For me too, thanks.

Not really  Cool

Man, that shit is strong indeed Cheesy





930. Post 2738059 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Loozik on July 15, 2013, 11:15:48 PM
Guys, come on.

Which of you is Miss Whale I played the innocent prank on yesterday?

You DID NOT lose that much money to write such bad things about me.

No need to be too angry with me. I am a nice guy after all  Cheesy

I already said I wouldn't be posting more calls.

Let's be friends. PM me or something.

Man, nobody is angry at you.

In fact that last post of yours about whales and daddys was so fun that we thought that you could only have written it while trippin hard Wink

Was indeed one of the funniest thing I've read in here today Cheesy



931. Post 2739921 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

ATM everything is proceeding as expected.

Big bounce from the 200 day EMA, and then a longish period of "wait and see" (I said that as long as two weeks of sideways trading was expected, just as we had before the fast crash to $66).

Fiat in the order book increasing, coins decreasing. An important milestone will be the shipping of ASIC miners en mass. ATM they are just a few, and they still enjoy good profits. No need to dump all the coins on the market. That will change soon.




932. Post 2740223 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on July 16, 2013, 09:31:34 AM
ATM everything is proceeding as expected.

Big bounce from the 200 day EMA, and then a longish period of "wait and see" (I said that as long as two weeks of sideways trading was expected, just as we had before the fast crash to $66).

Fiat in the order book increasing, coins decreasing. An important milestone will be the shipping of ASIC miners en mass. ATM they are just a few, and they still enjoy good profits. No need to dump all the coins on the market. That will change soon.



This is an interesting point I've been wondering about lately. I also believe they mentioned this on "Let's Talk Bitcoin" in the last week. What is going to happen with so many new mining rigs getting out there? The GPU miners will all off, almost there now.

I do wonder though, how many of these miners are just going to sit on their mined coins. The thing is, if many expect a downward movement in the price, then why not sell some while you can???
And what about all those coins already mined? Hmmmmm

Personally, I would probably sit on the coins, unless I was desperate for cash. Something about "owning" coins I've mined.

I'm a miner myself, and people in here doesn't not understand what a deep change in the game are ASICs. With GPUs, you could buy a $500 set-up and mine to hoard, as the investment was negligible and you could always sell your GPUs to gamers, "recouping your costs" was no big deal and no priority, it was a hobbyist occupation for 95% of the miners.

Now, the only purpose of those $2k, $4k, $7k ASIC rigs is to mine Bitcoin, and maaaany people didn't throw at those machines only "play money". Professional operations with the only purpose of generating PROFIT are being build up. Yes, many are still Bitcoin believers so they will hoard, but after they paid for their costs. And their aggregate costs are huge. BFL has millions of $ in preorders not shipped yet. KnC has millions of $ in preorders, there are millions of $ in Avalon chips, Bitfury machines and whatnot...

Now the very few ASIC miners (mostly Avalon miners, they are just a few hundred individuals) have enjoyed very healthy profits. They paid for their machines in a few days, with a few coins. But the profitability is declining VERY HARD, so more coins will have to be sold by the miners to recoup their hardware costs, which are denominated in FIAT.

Many seem to hide their heads in the ground, but the hard fact is that 10s of millions of $ have been invested in machines which only use is to mine BTC, and those 10s of millions of $ in mining rigs are a cost that miners are willing to recoup ASAP.

Some in here say "well, the BTC/USD will be higher, and miners will have to sell less coins to recover their costs". That's a logical fallacy, because the higher is going to be the BTC/USD, the more people will invest in mining hardware, making the amount of generated coins more distributed and in fewer quantity per individual miner/operation, thus the 3,600BTC generated per day will be probably dumped almost immediately, at least during the next few months, until the mining gold-rush is over and stabilizes, and the miners that are entering the ASIC game pay for their investment.



933. Post 2740390 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 16, 2013, 10:04:23 AM
ATM everything is proceeding as expected.

Big bounce from the 200 day EMA, and then a longish period of "wait and see" (I said that as long as two weeks of sideways trading was expected, just as we had before the fast crash to $66).

Fiat in the order book increasing, coins decreasing. An important milestone will be the shipping of ASIC miners en mass. ATM they are just a few, and they still enjoy good profits. No need to dump all the coins on the market. That will change soon.



any advice for a bull turned bear looking on in horror as the train left him at 66?

Haha you must be new here. Everything went as expected, apart from everything that went wrong ofcourse.
Did you miss the part where he turned out to be the biggest clown of this part of the forum?
Letting monkeys throw darts will give you a better chance of success than listening to this delusional joker.

He really must be totally delusional beyond help as he's posting here how everything is going according to plan while he turned out to be a complete failure just a few days ago.
Sad really.

Sweet little Shroomsy, should I quote you the many posts in which I said that huge bounces are expected? You know that I bought at $68, do you?

Wink



934. Post 2740417 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Yes, I guess I should quote about the traps (just check the dates, all these quotes are from the massive dip to $66 before the last trap, which started on July 6th):

Quote from: Rampion on July 03, 2013, 07:27:01 AM
Now, BTC is following a consistent downwards trend since April, 10th, full of bull traps and sucker rallies, but a consistent downwards trend nevertheless.

Quote from: Rampion on July 04, 2013, 08:53:00 AM
Now everybody is aware that BTC already survived a massive bubble deflation, so there are not so many "Bitcoin is a scam" believers. That and the bigger USD volume thrown at BTC during this bubble will make perma-bulls to live in a longer denial, thus lengthening their own suffering.

Still a couple of epic traps to go before despair and capitulation. I still don't think that the bear will last for multiple years as Birght Anarchist says, for sure many months to come, but 2/3 years seems a bit too much for BTC standards. Anyhow, BrightAnarchist got it right so far, let's grab some popcorn and see how this plays out.

Quote from: Rampion on July 05, 2013, 07:34:36 PM
Quickly wiring in some money so I can buy at the bottom.

Still way to go before the very bottom. Summer is still at the beginning. There will be bounces, traps can be long... Until another dump cycle begins.

Quote from: Rampion on July 05, 2013, 05:47:34 PM
Lots of dumps too, that last one was expensive though. Doubt they can afford to push it much lower without some big buys.

Bull traps are expected but bounces has been quite smallish during the crash from the $90s. I guess the big one will arrive soon... But nevertheless fear is taking over.

And the bounce finally arrived, the day after (July, 6th) - and that's why I bought at $68 to play that bounce. FYI: I already sold. Did you? Wink



935. Post 2741614 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: molecular on July 16, 2013, 02:05:03 PM
If the invested funds was taken from BTC savings they want BTC back, not FIAT.

I would have to agree with this.  +1

yep, so for those people, the selling (via asic manufacturer) of the BTC has already ocurred. Next up: mining like hell without selling.

I'm not sure however, how large that group is compared to the group that wants to recover fiat.


Yep, it's true, I've been a "100% BTC" miner myself, but I'm seeing a shift in the sentiment with the ASICs. I see people wanting to recover their fiat, and only then hoarding.



936. Post 2741633 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: 01BTC10 on July 16, 2013, 02:46:04 PM
Someone is having fun flashing 500BTC at $97.5

peanuts...



937. Post 2741984 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on July 16, 2013, 03:36:38 PM

problem is, allot of those miners won't get ROI for many months. Knowing this, I would expect most (except for those who took out loans) to choose to wait for higher prices before getting their fiat back.

Exactly, I dont see why on this forums people seem to think that miners want to get ROI as soon as possible. I think 90% of them will just mine and hoard, for years

Most of GPU miners didn't want ROI as soon as possible, as I explained earlier - they counted on reselling their GPUs, and they were mostly hobbyist. But I'm a miner myself, I know a lot of miners, I've seen in first person who are the customers of companies like KnC and how much they are spending, and you have to understand that this last media bubble exposed Bitcoin to a lot of new and uneducated people who run profit calculators at current difficulty (without having their miners yet), they do not even understand that difficulty is growing exponentially, and at the end of the day there is a "gold rush" in which a lot of new people is entering mining because they think they will get rich quick... So we have now a) a lot of individuals investing money they cannot afford to lose on BTC miners, and as you surely know there is a "get-rich-quick" feeling on BTC - they think they will recoup their investment FAST, and this is why they are putting in this game more money they should; b) there are more and more "professional" miners that are investing money in mining with the only intention of generating profit - they will run their operations as a business. That people has to pay for huge electricity costs, renting of industrial places where they will host their operations, etc. etc. etc. A lot of fiat expenses to cover.

During the GPU era, I rarely saw a) and b) miners, most were small-time hobbyist, running their rigs in their bedrooms. During this change to ASIC, I'm seeing a lot of both a) and b). This people needs to recoup fiat ASAP.



938. Post 2742004 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: Richy_T on July 16, 2013, 03:45:52 PM

problem is, allot of those miners won't get ROI for many months. Knowing this, I would expect most (except for those who took out loans) to choose to wait for higher prices before getting their fiat back.

Exactly, I dont see why on this forums people seem to think that miners want to get ROI as soon as possible. I think 90% of them will just mine and hoard, for years

Well, if the price gets high, it would make sense to sell to lock in profits. But if that's what people were doing, the bubble would not have been quite so crazy.

I'm sure you know the bubble started more or less when block reward halved, which was a moment when nobody had ASICs yet, 99% of the network were GPU and FPGA miners... Those already had their rigs paid off long ago (no new GPU and FPGA miners for a while because everybody was expecting ASICs since last summer), so as soon as they saw their proceeds halved they started to hold like mofos, creating scarcity of coins, which made the price to grow - the growing price attracted speculators, speculators bought driving the price high, the media started to run stories about how Bitcoin price was growing, which attracted more speculators, etc... Wash rinse and repeat, speculative bubble in its purest form.

This cycle is about to invert when ASICs will be widespread. Same thing happened in 2011 with GPUS.



939. Post 2742071 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on July 16, 2013, 03:57:14 PM

problem is, allot of those miners won't get ROI for many months. Knowing this, I would expect most (except for those who took out loans) to choose to wait for higher prices before getting their fiat back.

Exactly, I dont see why on this forums people seem to think that miners want to get ROI as soon as possible. I think 90% of them will just mine and hoard, for years

Well, if the price gets high, it would make sense to sell to lock in profits. But if that's what people were doing, the bubble would not have been quite so crazy.

I'm sure you know the bubble started more or less when block reward halved, which was a moment when nobody had ASICs yet, 99% of the network were GPU and FPGA miners... Those already had their rigs paid off long ago (no new GPU and FPGA miners for a while because everybody was expecting ASICs since last summer), so as soon as they saw their proceeds halved they started to hold like mofos, creating scarcity of coins, which made the price to grow - the growing price attracted speculators, speculators bought driving the price high, the media started to run stories about how Bitcoin price was growing, which attracted more speculators, etc... Wash rinse and repeat, speculative bubble in its purest form.

This cycle is about to invert when ASICs will be widespread. Same thing happened in 2011 with GPUS.

You really think people took loans to buy ASICs? I bet you most asic owners are early adopters from GPU times.

I surely don't know what's the %, but I surely know there are a lot of newcomers spending all their fiat savings (tens of k's of $) in miners because they think they will break even in one month and then they will have a x10 ROI in the first year... Loan or no loan I don't know, but you can be sure they are throwing at this more money they can afford to lose because they think this is a "no brainer" and they do not want to "miss the train".

I know for sure because I've been meeting/discussing with a lot of guys like that since March, both in cyber and meatspace.

There will be a lot of pain for miners very soon, you will see.



940. Post 2742149 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.10h):

Quote from: bitcryptonit on July 16, 2013, 04:05:43 PM
that doesnt mean people will start selling bitcoins asap. my mining rig didnt pay for itself and its reason i wont sell them cheap.

They will start selling bitcoins ASAP to cover their variable costs, or they will have to shut their rigs off. This already happened in 2011. Price was depressed for a long time, there were a lot of coins hitting the exchanges on a daily basis, and the hashrate actually declined because mining became unprofitable unless you had free electricity and no rent to pay for your operation. The "2011 mining gold rush" was triggered by a speculative bubble and a quickly rising BTC/USD exchange rate - history repeats itself, and the most probable outcome is that we will have the exact same situation in 2013.

To this there is an added unknown - GPU miners always counted on reselling their cards, and ASIC miners are counting on this too ATM. Most newcomers still dream about selling their $2k rig at $35k on ebay like some Avalon batch #1 owners did. But, they are deluded - this won't happen, as soon as supply and demand of ASIC miners adjust there won't be much resale potential, the only way to sell your unit will be to sell well below to market price - which will be adjusted to how many BTC the miners will generate.

I'm not speaking about the small guy buying one Klondike or BFL Single miner for his dorm room - I'm speaking about the big, professional mining operations that are being set up, and that will concentrate a big part of the hashing power.

ASICminer did very well, they didn't have the necessity to dump a lot of coins because they did the right thing in the right moment. The right moment is gone, many didn't realize that and are investing in multiple TH/s thinking they will get rich quick. Those type of guys, which in aggregate will be an important part of the hashrate, are the ones who will have no other option than to dump to at least cover their costs.

This already happened after the 2011 bubble, and I don't see why it won't happen again.



941. Post 2742379 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 16, 2013, 04:40:26 PM
MtGox price is decoupling from Bitstamp and BTC-e again. There seems to be concern because there hasn't been a single person sighted who has actually successfully withdrawn money from MtGox since they announced the end of the hiatus. If this is true, then money hasn't been allowed to flee MtGox for at least a month. I'd consider the MtGox price distorted, and I'm not sure how long Bitstamp and BTC-e are going to follow it that much, so the price gap will probably widen more.

Personally, I doubt MtGox is broke, but clearly they are having major problems probably with their banks, and they aren't forthright about things and keeping silent.

Pretty much agree. The price feels completely distorted, there's even been a bounty for someone to show a wire going thru after the hiatus and nobody was able to post a screenshot. Wow, that's puzzling. If people cannot withdraw their fiat, they will slowly buy BTC to move it to other exchanges, maintaining the price artificially high on Gox; the other exchanges, keep following Gox (even if they are decoupling now) because at the end of the day, MtGox its still the biggest market by far.



942. Post 2742800 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on July 16, 2013, 05:53:54 PM

Price isn't driven by miners, but by traders and commodity speculation as has been amply demonstrated elsewhere.


This.

It's obvious that price is not driven by difficulty, but inflation does have an impact on price - at this stage inflation in BTC its non negligible, and its in fact built into the system to pay for the work and costs of mining during the early days of Bitcoin. Thus, looking at growing difficulty and expecting growing price is a fallacy (in fact its the other way around) - but nevertheless Bitcoin is currently inflating at a 12.5% yearly rate, and what miners do with those newly minted coints has inevitably an impact on price.

I believe that there will be lots of newly minted coins hitting the exchanges in late 2013, will just wait and see.

EDIT: in fewer words, wether miners decide to speculate (holding) or to pay for their fiat costs (selling the coins for good) has inevitably an immediate impact on price.



943. Post 2743068 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on July 16, 2013, 06:34:33 PM
Bitcoin is currently inflating at a 12.5% yearly rate

I'm not sure where you got that figure.

Basic math.

This year (2013) aprox. BTC1,312,500 will be minted, those are being added to the BTC10,500,000 minted until the end of 2012, so at the end of the year you will have around BTC11,812,500

That's a yearly inflation of 12.5%

In 2014 it should be around 11%, in the following years it will decrease until aprox. 9% (2016) until it falls to 4% in 2017 because of the next reward halving.

Yes, surprise, Bitcoin the deflationary currency its in a heavily inflationary phase and it will be for the next decade. Good thing is that the inflation is predictable and immune to third party manipulation.



944. Post 2744669 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: notme on July 16, 2013, 07:33:01 PM

Price isn't driven by miners, but by traders and commodity speculation as has been amply demonstrated elsewhere.


This.

It's obvious that price is not driven by difficulty, but inflation does have an impact on price - at this stage inflation in BTC its non negligible, and its in fact built into the system to pay for the work and costs of mining during the early days of Bitcoin. Thus, looking at growing difficulty and expecting growing price is a fallacy (in fact its the other way around) - but nevertheless Bitcoin is currently inflating at a 12.5% yearly rate, and what miners do with those newly minted coints has inevitably an impact on price.

I believe that there will be lots of newly minted coins hitting the exchanges in late 2013, will just wait and see.

EDIT: in fewer words, wether miners decide to speculate (holding) or to pay for their fiat costs (selling the coins for good) has inevitably an immediate impact on price.

this is like concentrating on only one of your girlfriends butt cheaks, you know very well what the counter argument is.

Inflation rate of 12.5%, how is that even a point?

That's the fifth year in Bitcoin Survival= even if we assume linear and not exponential spread in bitcoin awareness, that's 20% more people using and storing value in BTC.

-7.5%

I love this bears latching onto a miners value case- they attribute psychological values wherever they please... when the price rose it was because everyone wanted to buy btc to buy asicminers, but asicminer wasn't selling his btc, even though 'asicminer is running it as a business' like they like to say whenever it suits them. suddenly asicminer and all the miners want to sell all their coins and only if the price dips, which is when they panic and drive the price further.

What about last year, when inflation rate was 25%, how come the price went up 1000%... and the year before when it was 40%, why did it go up 1000%? frankly if miners drive price I'm surprised it isn't at -0.1 cent

He didn't say difficulty drives price, he said it has a non negligible influence.  Your numbers seem to support that.  That said, I agree that counting on miners to sell out is a horrible assumption.

During the bear market in 2011 supply exceeded demand at a certain point and obviously the exchange rate tanked, and obviously the miners also had their role in that. What I never said is that miners were the ones causing the bear market, the bear market was caused by the bubble pop, and I just think that the same conditions can be met this year.

Quote from: chufchuf on July 16, 2013, 05:44:59 PM
What a lot of rubbish. You haven't seen anything, you're just a bear and you've been jumping on bearish reasonings for ages.

All this aggressivity towards bearish opinions is amusing and quite telling. I'm not "jumping" on anything, I write what I see. If I'm mistaken and the price goes only UP from here, I will be very happy, I guarantee you that.



945. Post 2746885 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quietly sitting on the 100 day EMA after rebounding on the 200 day EMA.

It feels like the quite before the storm. Not so many negative signs as before the bounce, that bounce was on relatively high volume and there's still people willing to buy. I wonder how much is the withdrawal problem affecting the price - I'd say quite a lot.






946. Post 2748499 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: 01BTC10 on July 17, 2013, 02:24:09 PM
Gox 98 and Bitstamp hit 89  Huh

People cashing out from Gox and selling on Bitstamp? Must be painful...

Well, it looks like that is what is happening.

Plus, the fact that Roger Ver uploads today an utterly stupid youtube video in which he repeats like a muppet that the delays are caused by "the traditional banking system inability to keep up with the demands of the growing Bitcoin economy" (literally) just makes it FUCKING WORSE.

WTF? Who they want to fool? I don't fear MtGox going broke because of fractional reserve and whatnot, but "the demands of the growing Bitcoin economy" its obviously NOT the problem, WTF are they hiding? That their banks won't deal with Bitcoin businesses anymore and they are struggling to find any bank that do want to work with them? That some of their funds are being freezed and investigated by their banks? What the hell is going on with these guys?

For the ones who missed the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP1YsMlrfF0&feature=c4-overview&list=UUZyrn1awtEVne0bdryfuI6A

Really can't cope will all these amateurish sh*t.







947. Post 2749514 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: capsqrl on July 17, 2013, 05:23:37 PM
What's going on with volume? Seems like only about 30 BTC has changed hands in the last 30 minutes.

BTC8.83 in the last 25 minutes to be exact.

That explains how "the traditional banking system is unable to keep up with the demands of a growing Bitcoin economy", poor Gox whose load is crashing the Mizuho bank, which has a yearly revenue of +1 billion

Cheesy



948. Post 2749533 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):




949. Post 2749634 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 17, 2013, 05:36:31 PM
What's going on with volume? Seems like only about 30 BTC has changed hands in the last 30 minutes.

BTC8.83 in the last 25 minutes to be exact.

That explains how "the traditional banking system is unable to keep up with the demands of a growing Bitcoin economy", poor Gox whose load is crashing the Mizuho bank, which has a yearly revenue of +1 billion

Cheesy
Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Can't believe how bearish this is. No big money is going to flow in under these conditions, so impulsive upward moves are pretty much guaranteed to not occur.

I do wonder whether all major banks have started to treat MtGox like Wikileaks, and whether that could extend to other exchanges as well.

I'm sure they will find some way for people to withdraw eventually, though, but I have no idea how long it can take.

I have mixed feelings, from one side I'm 99% sure of Gox's honesty, but I'm also sure they are just a bunch of amateurs... And the fact they either keep silent or spread bullshit makes me think the situation is much worse than it seems.

I'm very tempted to buy BTC at the current price with all my Gox fiat, send them to a paper wallet and come back in September. If Gox is having problems to find banks to work with, probably the other exchanges will follow soon.

BTW, do you know if Bitstamp worked with LR at some point? It seems that Citibank is using that excuse to bounce Gox's wires.



950. Post 2749757 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 17, 2013, 05:48:15 PM
Having money at MtGox I'm as worried as much as the last time this came up, not at all. The only annoying thing is that we're going to have to wait for SOME sort of withdrawal method to work for an impulsive downward move to occur. We're basically trapped in limbo where we can't go meaningfully up or down, and this applies to all exchanges.

BTW, do you know if Bitstamp worked with LR at some point? It seems that Citibank is using that excuse to bounce Gox's wires.
No clue. That's interesting to hear, can you point me to such reports? Are there any other such banks that we know of that block all MtGox transfers?

Quickly found this, but there were other reports of the same problem in different threads, including screenshots: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=242856.msg2577090#msg2577090



951. Post 2752033 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 18, 2013, 12:59:07 AM
SatoshiDice is being sold, in full, to a new company that will take over all ownership, operations, and management.  The total sale price is 126,315 BTC, or 0.00126315 BTC per share.

According to the MPEX Agreement, MPEX holders are entitled to receive 0.00126315 BTC per share, alongside other private owners. However, for the good of the MPEX holders and for the sake of the general Bitcoin community, which the site always has intended to support and nurture, SatoshiDice has arranged to pay MPEX holders an additional .00223685 BTC per share bringing the total to 0.0035 BTC per share.

I inferred 350k based on that, since there are apparently 100 million shares.

350k BTC seems to be an insanely huge number.  Huh

SatoshiDice is no small fish.

Well, some action at last. "The Great Coin Distribution" is approaching. Wink



952. Post 2752074 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 18, 2013, 01:02:50 AM
350k BTC seems to be an insanely huge number.  Huh

Fuck it, even 120k is an insanely huge number for a simple website like satoshi dice.  That's 1% of all current bitcoins for a concept that anybody can copy  Huh
I see it the same. For this reason, I'm beginning to favor this scenario: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=258066.msg2751829#msg2751829

The buyer may well be an established online casino. That would be actually good news, SD needs some big improvement.

Its also possible they have been accumulating, the BTC sum they need is big.



953. Post 2752108 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Voodah on July 18, 2013, 01:13:03 AM
350k BTC seems to be an insanely huge number.  Huh

Fuck it, even 120k is an insanely huge number for a simple website like satoshi dice.  That's 1% of all current bitcoins for a concept that anybody can copy  Huh
I see it the same. For this reason, I'm beginning to favor this scenario: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=258066.msg2751829#msg2751829

Still makes no sense.

120k btc = 12 million dollars for a simple website that can be developed for a tiny fraction of the cost, generates little to no revenue and currently stale, with lots of competition popping up.

If big casino owners know one thing, it's not to give money away. Something's fishy here.

Well, SD is the absolute market leader. 50% of the transactions on the blockchain are theirs. That has a value. But still I agree that 120k btc is crazy money, and 350k its pure madness (totally unbelievable IMO).



954. Post 2752118 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 18, 2013, 01:15:35 AM
You think so? Brand and domain might have been worth it to them in addition to the code. Remember they are already generating profits. I don't know much of the gambling business however, and not of SatoshiDice either.

Check this then (very interesting thread to follow): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=80312.1560

Example of how is it going this month so far.

Quote from: dooglus on July 16, 2013, 07:44:49 PM
Total of 24 bets unaccounted for.

Results: 2013-Jul-16 12:42pm (up to block 246908)

   Address  Target   Should Win |    #Bets |        Win        |   Lose  | Refunds |   BTC In   |  BTC Out   |  Refund  |   Profit  |   RTP  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1dice9wVt   64000      0.97656 |    25426 |   23023 (0.97866) |     502 |    1901 |   26603.74 |   26164.46 |   241.51 |    439.27 |  98.349
1diceDCd2   60000      0.91553 |   193335 |  176016 (0.91540) |   16268 |    1051 |   93427.14 |   92114.33 |     2.82 |   1312.81 |  98.595
1dicegEAr   56000      0.85449 |   112158 |   95311 (0.85627) |   15999 |     848 |   92457.26 |   91521.79 |   401.51 |    935.47 |  98.988
1dicec9k7   52000      0.79346 |   119581 |   94300 (0.79378) |   24499 |     782 |   75268.98 |   73418.24 |  1188.46 |   1850.74 |  97.541
1dice9wcM   48000      0.73242 |   507677 |  372172 (0.73465) |  134429 |    1076 |  336272.64 |  328185.66 |  6173.68 |   8086.97 |  97.595
1dice97EC   32768      0.50000 |   905115 |  451052 (0.49945) |  452046 |    2017 |  798114.52 |  776529.14 |  6524.75 |  21585.38 |  97.295
1dice8EMZ   32000      0.48828 |  1426831 |  695370 (0.48810) |  729279 |    2182 |  988063.13 |  968517.81 |  3003.07 |  19545.32 |  98.022
1dice7W2A   24000      0.36621 |   341536 |  125136 (0.36723) |  215625 |     775 |  605381.40 |  596553.60 |  1014.04 |   8827.80 |  98.542
1dice7fUk   16000      0.24414 |   363687 |   88548 (0.24406) |  274270 |     869 |  417745.53 |  402519.94 |  2323.71 |  15225.59 |  96.355
1dice7EYz   12000      0.18311 |   150615 |   27436 (0.18303) |  122461 |     718 |  188541.71 |  188869.29 |  3315.59 |   -327.58 | 100.174
1dice6YgE    8000      0.12207 |   277875 |   33946 (0.12248) |  243204 |     725 |  147836.19 |  147994.99 |   307.35 |   -158.79 | 100.107
1dice6wBx    6000      0.09155 |    70897 |    6422 (0.09136) |   63869 |     606 |   19951.31 |   20899.15 |     7.85 |   -947.83 | 104.751
1dice6GV5    4000      0.06104 |    43065 |    2647 (0.06210) |   39980 |     438 |    8269.12 |    8222.48 |    31.52 |     46.63 |  99.436
1dice6gJg    3000      0.04578 |    34552 |    1578 (0.04639) |   32440 |     534 |   11222.72 |   11920.27 |    40.52 |   -697.54 | 106.215
1dice6DPt    2000      0.03052 |   122699 |    3716 (0.03041) |  118486 |     497 |   77810.49 |   74090.88 |   155.74 |   3719.60 |  95.220
1dice61SN    1500      0.02289 |    29229 |     665 (0.02310) |   28129 |     435 |    8185.82 |    8736.31 |    15.39 |   -550.48 | 106.725
1dice5wwE    1000      0.01526 |   188862 |    2885 (0.01534) |  185222 |     755 |   57953.66 |   53732.54 |    31.32 |   4221.11 |  92.716
1dice4J1m     512      0.00781 |    43212 |     337 (0.00795) |   42056 |     819 |    8585.16 |    6997.57 |    10.42 |   1587.58 |  81.508
1dice3jkp     256      0.00391 |    29236 |     119 (0.00413) |   28663 |     454 |    6156.95 |    8717.39 |    13.38 |  -2560.43 | 141.586
1dice37Ee     128      0.00195 |    24246 |      44 (0.00186) |   23648 |     554 |    2483.10 |    1603.41 |    57.56 |    879.69 |  64.573
1dice2zdo      64      0.00098 |    33752 |      36 (0.00109) |   33127 |     589 |    2281.70 |    1750.87 |   117.25 |    530.83 |  76.735
1dice2xkj      32      0.00049 |    36338 |      17 (0.00047) |   35840 |     481 |    1782.40 |    1911.50 |     1.67 |   -129.09 | 107.243
1dice2WmR      16      0.00024 |    27629 |       5 (0.00018) |   27113 |     511 |     951.67 |     606.99 |    22.28 |    344.68 |  63.782
1dice2vQo       8      0.00012 |    28304 |       5 (0.00018) |   27728 |     571 |     669.20 |     434.20 |    15.55 |    235.00 |  64.884
1dice2pxm       4      0.00006 |    16219 |       2 (0.00013) |   15654 |     563 |     242.32 |     320.54 |    18.89 |    -78.21 | 132.278
1dice1Qf4       2      0.00003 |    14147 |       0 (0.00000) |   13529 |     618 |     199.71 |       0.59 |    31.53 |    199.12 |   0.296
1dice1e6p       1      0.00002 |   169768 |       4 (0.00002) |  166841 |    2923 |    2216.26 |    4485.65 |   198.71 |  -2269.39 | 202.398
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           small (bets < 4 BTC) |  5195129 | 2140284           | 3030867 |   23978 |  982565.01 |  964391.24 |   381.73 |  18173.77 |  98.150
            big (bets >= 4 BTC) |   140862 |   60508           |   80040 |     314 | 2996108.94 | 2932428.47 | 24884.47 |  63680.46 |  97.875
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                |  5335991 | 2200792           | 3110907 |   24292 | 3978673.96 | 3896819.72 | 25266.20 |  81854.23 |  97.943
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SD Profit before fees:      81854.23941543 BTC (2.057%)
Cumulative Fees Paid:        4613.71077500 BTC
SD Profit after fees:       77240.52864043 BTC (1.941%)
Pending Liabilities:            1.01526382 BTC
Final SD Profit:            77239.51337661 BTC (1.941%)
Profit This Month:            189.06436327 BTC
----
Since Satoshi Dice started, there have been:
Blockchain Tx: 17874656  :  SatoshiDice Tx:  9801901  (54.8%)
Blockchain MB:   7875.6  :  SatoshiDice MB:   4048.9  (51.4%)




[/quote]



955. Post 2752144 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 18, 2013, 01:21:55 AM
Seems solid enough to be. Someone could calculate P/E ratios although I'm sure it's been done by people looking to buy shares in the past. Might well be worth 12 million USD at least.

Anyway, I don't think it that important to speculate on this rather than the effect of the BTC on the market.

Short term? down. But pretty excited for this news overall, if its an established casino it could be a global boost for BTC.



956. Post 2752172 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: solex on July 18, 2013, 01:24:25 AM
189 BTC proft in 1/2 month, so only 27 years to recover the investment. Then free money for the new owners. Woohoo!

Have you read the SD statystical analysis thread and looked at the monthly profit charts? Big losing strike from 9 to 14 July. Variance. And still BTC77,239.51 total profit so far. At the beginning of 2013, total profit was at aprox. BTC32,000.

Do the math and let me know again.



957. Post 2752200 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 18, 2013, 01:30:07 AM
So, how are we going to refer to the ensuing price drop?

SatoshiDiceddon?

I really invite you check the SatoshiDice statistical analysis thread, you will see how incredible were the profits during the bubble inflation, people gambled like there was no tomorrow. Tens of k's of BTC profit per month.

If this buyout is true is probably the biggest investment ever in the Bitcoin economy, and its not pure speculation. Its big big news, guys.



958. Post 2753665 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Ahhhhh.... I love the smell of big red candles in the morning Cheesy






959. Post 2753733 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

I guess that the Satoshi Dice buyer has been loading up coins for the last weeks. +150k is a huge amount.

If they are going to pay NOW, the buying should have been ended. I would be more worried by a sudden lack of buying pressure than for massive dumps from shareholders.

Nevertheless, I guess Erik will dump a little. I bet he could use at least $1M in dirty fiat Cheesy



960. Post 2753861 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: chufchuf on July 18, 2013, 08:05:45 AM
there's no way shareholders will dump but btc's still gonna move violently on any news so people can profit short term.


this subforum is overrun by fapping bears.

someone buys satoshidice for a ton of bitcoins- incredibly bullish in any reading, but only here do hyperactive bears shoot up saying its a crash.

and just yesterday those bears were saying miners defined price, whereas now they say that yesterday some investor was buying bitcoins in order to buy satoshi dice.

if mtgox resumes full wiring- crash because money will leave gox.

if mtgox doesn't resume full wires- crash because people lose confidence because money can't leave gox.

just a bunch of arsewipes that lost on the bull run earlier this year.

Let's see:

Quote from: Rampion on July 18, 2013, 01:23:32 AM
Seems solid enough to be. Someone could calculate P/E ratios although I'm sure it's been done by people looking to buy shares in the past. Might well be worth 12 million USD at least.

Anyway, I don't think it that important to speculate on this rather than the effect of the BTC on the market.

Short term? down. But pretty excited for this news overall, if its an established casino it could be a global boost for BTC.

Quote from: Rampion on July 18, 2013, 01:37:01 AM
If this buyout is true is probably the biggest investment ever in the Bitcoin economy, and its not pure speculation. Its big big news, guys.

A couple of facts:

1) this could be HUGE news for BTC because is a very big investment, and if the company/investor is a well established casino with deep pockets this might be a huge boost for BTC real economy (yep, Silk Road and gambling are REAL economy). This will probably have an impact mid to long term.

2) there will be a HUGE amount of BTC changing hands very soon. This will probably have an impact short term.

This is the speculation subforum and we are speculating. So much hate for the "bears" is amusing.

Last but not least, if you think that Frozenlock, Blitz of myself "lost the bull run" earlier this year you really lack reading comprehension skills. I personally didn't turn a bear until the very end of May when we peaked at $130ish, and in fact if you look at my post history you will see that I sold at $129ish at the very beginning of June - until then I still hoped for "the correction" case, while I acknowledged a possible bubble deflation process, until that very moment I wasn't sure it could only go down so I held. Plus, +60% of the proceeds of that early June sale were immediately reinvested in BTC related ventures, and only 15% went to recouping initial fiat investment and securing a little profit. Just aprox. 20% of the proceeds of that sale are "waiting for cheap coins", while I still hold a paper wallet with a very healthy amount of BTC as a long-term investment. And for the record, I never shorted BTC, and probably never will as a matter of principle.

If you think the above makes me a despicable bear that deserves to be hated, then maybe you have a denial problem like other hot-headed perma-bulls. The trend is down since April 10th, the highs have been lower, and selling at triple digits has been undeniably a profitable move. The most likely scenario is the price will keep going down mid term (with plenty of bull traps on the way), and if suddenly goes consistently up there's still plenty of room to buy back at a profit.



961. Post 2754067 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 18, 2013, 09:18:13 AM
Is there any bad news I missed?

No, just the bull trap closing.

When will people realize that we had very good news for the last weeks, but still the price goes down because price is driven by price action itself?



962. Post 2754090 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: lucas.sev on July 18, 2013, 09:20:26 AM
Is there any bad news I missed?

No, just the bull trap closing.

so what is this satoshi dice thing people keep mentioning? I mean how could it affect the price?

Well, there is both a) a company that has bought massive amounts of BTC (I'm assuming they already bought them and they did it in the last weeks), thus creating big buying pressure (they are paying +150k coins to buy SD); b) a huge amount of BTC changing hands.

IMO the most likely outcome short term is down, both because a) the buying pressure of that big investor is gone; b) a small part of the BTC that changes hands will be sold

Obviously we can't know if the buyer already had hundred of coins bought sub-dollar, or if he has been buying during the last weeks, or maybe he didn't finish to buy yet; so this is just wild speculation, if it seems too bearish for some I invite them to share with us possible bullish scenarios for the short term; mid to long term I assume we all pretty much agree that a big investment on BTC real economy is bullish.



963. Post 2754310 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):




964. Post 2754460 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Once upon a time $88 and $79 were support Cheesy



965. Post 2754515 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Some good, anti-FUD news:

Quote from: Mythoranium on July 18, 2013, 10:48:54 AM
I can now happily confirm that today I received my EUR SEPA transfer, after waiting since June 9thSmiley
Makes me feel relieved.

My withdrawal status changed from "confirmed" to "pending" a few days ago, so pending probably means it's on it's way across banks.

Wink



966. Post 2754524 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: samson on July 18, 2013, 10:58:58 AM
Where are my $20 Bitcoins ?

Patiente, little grasshoper. We need Gox to finally pull his shit together so the good old traders can realize their fiat profits and enjoy their holidays.



967. Post 2755135 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

We could use a bigger ChartBuddy, couldn't we? Clicking on it every time its a pain, its much better when you can have the picture of the book at first glance.

The ones hating it can just ignore it.



968. Post 2755413 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: hlynur on July 18, 2013, 01:48:32 PM
This letter is being posted roughly 24 hours prior to the payout....
The payout will occur in roughly 20 increments over a period of several hours and will arrive in S.DICE holders’ accounts (in the same manner as dividends)

so payout to shareholders will start roughly in 12 hours and market is already getting in the right mood?
there is no particular date mentioned in the statement, so when will the coins be payed out precisely?

I'd consider it a good case if just 5 to 10% of these coins are dumped but I suspect it will be more with the herd following the trend.
Just depends on the shareholders how much they reinvest in btc economy (AM-share price already gone up a little)
and how much they hold or cash out.
(imo it's not unrealistic that a lot will reinvest because that's what they did in first place, right?)

well nevertheless i foresee a red candle party after the payout...please correct me if i'm overestimating the effect of this.
I'm not sure how to estimate the regular s.dice-shareholder and his behaviour Tongue, i hope he's a longterm investor now looking for other possiblities.

Another question is if people that want to cash out quick really go to gox and wait forever for their money or if they sell at the other exchanges?

I expect the big dump of the day to have already happened ($98ish to $88ish), but that's kind hard to predict. The overall trend is obviously down, but predicting how fast that will happen is just a gamble.



969. Post 2755574 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Some more anti-FUD:

Quote from: nsfsj on July 18, 2013, 01:26:13 PM
One of my withdrawals arrived today. This was, however, the last one I did. Two still remains (which was executed prior to the one I received).

So, Gox is wiring people's money: you are free to sell and cash in your hard-earned fiat profits, summer is long Cheesy



970. Post 2757256 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

The selling party can begin Cheesy

Quote from: OhShei8e on July 18, 2013, 06:38:18 PM
Hey everybody. My withdrawal from MtGox in Euros via SEPA is heavily delayed. It has been "confirmed" (e.g. cued for execution) for 14 days now. I complained and demanded a cancellation to rebuy bitcoins and sell them on Bitstamp or alike. They refused that and told me to wait "just a little longer" as the transfer is "in the middle of being processed" by their bank (which I find a completely inadequate and unprofessional - if not childish - description of whatever is happening to the transaction right now). I consider this as unacceptable. I wanted to share this experience with other users here so they are warned when considering using MtGox to sell their BTC for Euro. If you had comparable experience please share.

My SEPA Withdrawal arrived today (950€). 



971. Post 2757315 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: thezerg on July 18, 2013, 07:18:33 PM
The selling party can begin Cheesy

Hey everybody. My withdrawal from MtGox in Euros via SEPA is heavily delayed. It has been "confirmed" (e.g. cued for execution) for 14 days now. I complained and demanded a cancellation to rebuy bitcoins and sell them on Bitstamp or alike. They refused that and told me to wait "just a little longer" as the transfer is "in the middle of being processed" by their bank (which I find a completely inadequate and unprofessional - if not childish - description of whatever is happening to the transaction right now). I consider this as unacceptable. I wanted to share this experience with other users here so they are warned when considering using MtGox to sell their BTC for Euro. If you had comparable experience please share.

My SEPA Withdrawal arrived today (950€). 

Interesting... if they had liquidity issues they would have agreed to the cancellation as that keeps the fiat at Gox.  Seems just like bad customer support.

Not so bad, contacted them two days ago and replayed in 24 hours with a non-template email. But it seems they have been pretty much overwhelmed by the "hiatus" situation.



972. Post 2757543 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 18, 2013, 07:52:21 PM
So MtGox is servicing withdrawals AND we have 155k BTC to be dispersed in 4 hours?

Goodbye, triple digits. Does anyone remember those?

I'm starting to think you are mentally challenged or something.
You already looked like a complete fool twice over the past 2 weeks and you just go on like nothing happened. Just like that other delusional tool Rampion. What is wrong with you people? Don't you have any shame?
Don't you see you were wrong twice already? Do you just ignore it or what?
I'm just totally amazed by your behaviour. You really don't seem sane.

God, Shroomsy I love you, you're really making me laugh out loud, I'm almost pissing my pants!!!!

Pure comedy gold Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



973. Post 2757686 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: gandhibt on July 18, 2013, 07:56:40 PM
So MtGox is servicing withdrawals AND we have 155k BTC to be dispersed in 4 hours?

Goodbye, triple digits. Does anyone remember those?

I'm starting to think you are mentally challenged or something.
You already looked like a complete fool twice over the past 2 weeks and you just go on like nothing happened. Just like that other delusional tool Rampion. What is wrong with you people? Don't you have any shame?
Don't you see you were wrong twice already? Do you just ignore it or what?
I'm just totally amazed by your behaviour. You really don't seem sane.

Don't be so angry all the time, it's not good for you.

“You will not be punished for your anger, you will be punished by your anger.” -Buddha

But its somewhat tender, like a hurt puppy (no offense intended, shroomsy). Maybe its that Avatar? I have to admit that when I see "last post by Shroomsy" in this thread I rush to open it Cheesy



974. Post 2757848 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on July 18, 2013, 08:39:01 PM
Twice that idiot said no more triple digits in 2013 and both times we had triple digits a few days later.
That's not wrong, that's prematurely right. Cheesy

God, you're pathetic.

Shroomsy my little friend, why do you keep reading this subforum and watching the price if it hurts so much?



975. Post 2760542 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 19, 2013, 07:38:24 AM
Shit.

Shit shit shit.

Shit shit shit shit shit.

An alternate count in my waves is making me very much less certain of a drop.

 Cry

Well, share that count bro.



976. Post 2760547 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

SEPA transfers coming through in one day.

Quote from: klaus on July 19, 2013, 05:47:30 AM
My SEPA Withdrawal arrived today (950€). 

I can confirm what OhShei8e says. I tested SEPA with 500 Euro.

Send 2013/07/17



Incoming 2013/07/18




I think SEPA is different than international wire because as you can see, SEPA comes from mtgox Poland Account.

Gox pulling its shit together. Nice!



977. Post 2760564 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: tutkarz on July 19, 2013, 07:55:17 AM
Too many people are trying to force others to sell their bitcoins.

Care to explain who is trying to force others to do something? I've seen NO ONE trying to force others to buy or to sell. Only a delusional fool could think that his posts in here can manipulate the market. This is the speculation subforum at bitcointalk.org, where bears and bulls speculate about the price, mixed with a biggish amount of trolling and FUD spreading, because at the end of the day this is a forum and is mostly about having fun.




978. Post 2760571 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Coins steadily hitting Gox, it would be a perfect time for Karpeles to announce that they are catching up with all withdrawals.

Godspeed Karpeles, we need you.




979. Post 2760660 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 19, 2013, 08:23:36 AM
Shit.

Shit shit shit.

Shit shit shit shit shit.

An alternate count in my waves is making me very much less certain of a drop.

 Cry

Well, share that count bro.

Was just revisiting the 2012 correction to compare...
Seems it's ending with a diagonal C.

IF the same thing was happening now, we could very well be at the end of the bear market.
Like... right now.

But I really don't know... let's just say I'm not so sure anymore.    Cry






980. Post 2760688 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 19, 2013, 08:28:42 AM
2012:



(I should call that ABCDE rather than 12345, but this gives the idea.)

Quote from: Paperweight on June 05, 2011, 05:18:23 AM
This time's it's different.

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



981. Post 2760701 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: Frozenlock on July 19, 2013, 08:34:35 AM

Stop spreading FUD!!!   Tongue

Hey Frozenlock, how can I propose you as a mod? I think Blitz could use some help Cheesy



982. Post 2760760 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: solex on July 19, 2013, 08:48:51 AM
Ahh. The internet never forgets...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=42514.msg2449374#msg2449374

Yep - never, ever Cheesy



983. Post 2760822 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

I use Shroomsy waves.

When a wave of butthurt hits this thread, I know it's time to SELL SELL SELL

Cheesy



984. Post 2761651 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

IAS, I think we will definitely visit the '50s but I'm not sure if it will happen so fast as in your extrapolation. My impression is that we have entered a "slowish" phase, and I don't expect impulsive moves downwards for the moment, just sideway trading + a few dumps that will gradually take us down for a while, mixed up with bounces and traps.

Regarding the SatoshiDice thing, I'm honestly not expecting big dumping by the shareholders who received the monies. My guess is that the big dump related to the SD buyout already happened, insiders dumped before the thing hit the news, as usual in both BTC and FIAT world - and that IMO explains at least partially the dump that took us to the '80s from the high '90s.

The dumping of SD shareholders don't seem to me like a probable bearapocalypse, what really intrigues me is when the SD buyer bought his +100k coins. Did he bought in the last weeks? In the last months? +100k are big volume, and I wonder how much of the big moves upwards triggered in the last weeks are direct consequence of the buying of the new owner of SD. If he did most of the buying in the last weeks, and thus is responsible of the impulsive move upwards from $66 to $104, I think the lack of buying pressure will be much more relevant than the eventual "dumping" of SD ex-shareholders.



985. Post 2761666 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: tutkarz on July 19, 2013, 12:42:00 PM
interesting part is that people who are waiting for confirmation of trend reversal (which i think already happend and bubble deflated at $65) for $120 mark then they will have to buy back half the coins they could have at $65.

People here often show 2011 bubble to compare to 2013 one but they seem to don't see that no matter what, after one bubble there will be another 10 times bigger. This was the case 3 times now and will happen again. Then why one is trying to hit the bottom to buy if they can just buy now, sit, relax and enjoy the ride to the top? They will profit anyway and trying to hit bottom may as well end up in losing coins.

Because having 1,000 coins is very different to having 500 coins.

Hitting the very bottom is pure luck, but buying 50% lower than you sold is quite achievable in a Bitcoin bear market.



986. Post 2764717 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

USD wires working again like a charm.

Quote from: EPiSKiNG on July 18, 2013, 10:12:28 PM


Bounty to: 18KcLRpwrzmjkumE7Xpqk2NV2oZbL6QsHT

-EP


You can all secure your dirty fiat profits with no fear whatsoever Cheesy



987. Post 2764787 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.11h):

Quote from: MoreFun on July 19, 2013, 09:54:40 PM
Rampion what is this site with "R" Platform (3rd tab).

Anyway, good luck with your retirement (72 years - from screenshot Wink ).

It's not my screenshot, luckily enough I don't live in the "land of the freedom", just took that quote from another thread, the withdrawal was requested after the announcement of the usd hiatus



988. Post 2825074 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 29, 2013, 10:08:18 AM
And indeed it's true that only few Bitcoins that have left the visible order book on MtGox have hit Bitstamp so far.

Indeed. Tens of k's of BTC leaving Gox, but just very few hitting Bitstamp, that's interesting.



989. Post 2876594 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.12h):

Quote from: rpietila on August 06, 2013, 10:23:22 AM
It still feels slow...


One month, and only up +50%. It feels like February then...

300k USD per BTC by the end of the year, or are you in denial of facts?



990. Post 2924739 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: gandhibt on August 13, 2013, 12:22:06 PM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1k9jhv/congress_appropriations_bill_directs_fbi_to/

a lot of shit is gonna go down soon
i'm happy to be part of the bitcoin world, always exciting news  Grin

Translation from reddit:

"Please, if I could have your attention. Allow me to translate, for your amusement, from legalese into plain English of people doing things.

People using their money in ways we don't like.-- We understand that Bitcoins and other forms of peer-to-peer digital currency can be used by people we dislike who do things we have prohibited, sometimes competing with us on terror activities, to transfer and spend money in ways we cannot spy upon or stop. News reports show that Bitcoins have been used to help Edward Snowden. We want the people doing business as "the FBI" to conspire with a bunch of other d.b.a's to tell us, in less than 120 days after this new commandment we just made up, how this "ersatz currency" (hehe, see what we did there?) affects our organized racket, in terms of both helping the businesses of people we have declared as "enemies" and in out-competing our buddies the bankers. The info must outline a conspiracy to sabotage Bitcoin's features, identifying people, money and other resources that will be necessary for this sabotage.
Phew. I thought my poor Model M was gonna smolder under the weight of translating so many sophisms, newspeak neologisms, half-truths, and veiled threats.
Aaanyway: https://rudd-o.com/archives/its-official-the-racketeers-are-onto-bitcoin for the same version but permalinkable.

Conclusion: the most powerful terrorist organization that has ever existed in the world, with the actual power to literally murder everyone if they so chose, is preparing to attack Bitcoin directly. It's about to get real."

That translation pretty much nailed it.



991. Post 2928067 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):




992. Post 2958107 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on August 18, 2013, 09:34:02 AM
Looks like we are going up and in more than one way (TA, bid/sum, etc.)

And something to think about, as Mining is getting bigger and bigger (bigger money, players, etc.) one has to consider that the miners (companies?) will and should also invest into BTC. Yeah, that sounds odd,
mining coins and not selling them and yet buying coins. But big money has to support itself IF people do not. Not saying that will happen, but it happens in many business models, in the sense like look at Amazon, how they sold books at little to no profit to get things rolling.


100% agreed my friend, many indicators say we are going up, only uncertain factor is the distortion of the price cause by Gox problems with withdrawals.

Glad I bought back at 101.9x 30% of what I sold at $129, now wondering in which spot to place the next bid...  $105ish?

Thinks are getting interesting nevertheless.



993. Post 2964016 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: Traktion on August 19, 2013, 12:02:31 PM
I suspect people are more concerned about getting their money out at all, than just waiting a month. Why else would you pay a 20% premium?

If you were buying coins now, you wouldn't be wiring funds to Gox and paying a 20% premium. The only people who would pay that are those who (unfortunately) have fiat funds there waiting already.

Also, Gox would be for traders. Try trading on Stamp, it is hard. You could keep your coins on Stamp and trade with some on Gox as there is the action.

I trade regularly on Stamp, without any major issues. TBH, it tends to be a bit less erratic, IMO.


Try making trades of +300 coins at Bitstamp without MAYOR slippage and then report back please...

Even on Gox, the slippage is a huge profit killer for traders - on Bitstamp is just impossible to daytrade for anyone with a little more than play money.



994. Post 2966818 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: chodpaba on August 19, 2013, 07:42:56 PM
so... if xfers out are being processed by hand, does this increase likelihood of insider trading? Who would be surprised if gox employees are leaking data to friends re "hey guys, word is today was a big deal for xfers out, i did 20 mil alone." Or, "we actually got some new deposits today, me and another dude processed roughly 5 mil."

srsly. how do you prevent leaking $ in and out info when it's all being handled by hand (by low level employees/temps)?

This is a concern of mine as well.

"insider trading" is unavoidable and happens in all the markets. People with privileged info will use it to make money.

Anyhow, trading in this market is pretty risky - and pointless. I think this is a "hold" moment. Just choose what you wish to hold, fiat or BTC.

For Shroomsy and all the bear haters, here goes the disclaimer - I'm holding mostly BTC since $105ish, and I have 0 funds on exchanges - they are all on my bank account or in paper wallets.



995. Post 2969700 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: gog1 on August 20, 2013, 04:55:32 AM
http://gigaom.com/2013/08/19/feds-seized-2-9m-in-bitcoin-funds-from-mt-gox-court-docs-show/

"The federal government sent a strong signal to Bitcoin traders earlier this year when the U.S. Department of Homeland Security seized an account belonging to Mt. Gox, the most popular exchange for people to buy and sell the crypto-currency. It was unclear at the time just how much currency the government confiscated.

But a new filing in Baltimore federal court (embedded below) shows the feds seized $2,915,507.40 held in an account controlled by Dwolla, a third-party payment platform similar to PayPal. The funds belonged to Mutum Sigillum LLC, a U.S. subsidiary of Tokyo-based Mt. Gox."

There are 14 million on the bid side, a seizure of 2.9 billion should not leave gox insolvent.

Agreed. Plus, those are mostly their customer's funds, right?



996. Post 2970137 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):




997. Post 2970199 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on August 20, 2013, 09:21:12 AM
<images removed>

An economist would say that the bid sum is clearly on a trajectory to infinity, and the ask sum to zero  

Or "healthy amount of fiat in the order book, but supply of coins declining fast" - that should take the Gox price higher. If and when it touches $130ish at Gox, and if the spread with Bitstamp is still 15% of higher, I will try for sure some arbitrage. The opportunity is too big not to try.



998. Post 2970249 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on August 20, 2013, 09:30:20 AM
<images removed>

An economist would say that the bid sum is clearly on a trajectory to infinity, and the ask sum to zero  

Or "healthy amount of fiat in the order book, but supply of coins declining fast" - that should take the Gox price higher. If and when it touches $130ish at Gox, and if the spread with Bitstamp is still 15% of higher, I will try for sure some arbitrage. The opportunity is too big not to try.

It's gonna touch $130  Grin
TBH I don't think $130-$136 is such-  big deal ... might take a couple of days to push through it, but S3052 and Vokain's Head and Shoulder Bottom is totally in play now, which would give target of about $160. Given the supply constraints and the constant buying pressure that could play out relatively quickly.

Definitely worth an arbitrage shot. I'll sell, ask for a withdrawal and see if it clears out quickly. If it does, there is a ton of money in arbitrage to be done.



999. Post 2970750 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: phoenix1 on August 20, 2013, 09:48:49 AM
<images removed>

An economist would say that the bid sum is clearly on a trajectory to infinity, and the ask sum to zero  

Or "healthy amount of fiat in the order book, but supply of coins declining fast" - that should take the Gox price higher. If and when it touches $130ish at Gox, and if the spread with Bitstamp is still 15% of higher, I will try for sure some arbitrage. The opportunity is too big not to try.

It's gonna touch $130  Grin
TBH I don't think $130-$136 is such-  big deal ... might take a couple of days to push through it, but S3052 and Vokain's Head and Shoulder Bottom is totally in play now, which would give target of about $160. Given the supply constraints and the constant buying pressure that could play out relatively quickly.

Definitely worth an arbitrage shot. I'll sell, ask for a withdrawal and see if it clears out quickly. If it does, there is a ton of money in arbitrage to be done.

Don't understand why you don't just ask for a (small) withdrawal now if you want to test Gox. Or are you assuming that a bigger one will clear quicker and you don't want to move that much out right now ?

Exactly. Back in the day, when I started using Gox, I "tested" it with a 100€ withdraw. That indeed took longer (10 business days or so at least), plus I had the unpleasant surprise to receive into my account only 65€ because of the various fees. But at least I touched with my hands they were "legit". Moths after that (post bubble obviously, after the big profits were met) I started making bigger and bigger withdraws, and they cleared super-fast. Heck, during the Dwolla aftermath with everybody complaining about huge SEPA delays I made 3 separate withdraws: 2 of them arrived to my account in 2 days and one of them in 3 days. To shut up the "I don't believe you" crowd and to be ready in case somebody wishes to bet I'm a liar I just posted the exact dates here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=179586.msg2970683#msg2970683

I will quote them here too:

Quote
WITHDRAW 1: requested June 3th, received on June 6th
WITHDRAW 2: requested June 4th, received on June 6th
WITHDRAW 3: requested June 9th, received on June 11th

So, if I'm going to take the risk to test how fast is Gox 2 months later my last withdraw to make arbitrage, I want to do it for a good profit - plus my experience tells me the bigger is the withdraw, the faster it clears. Thus for me there is no point in making arbitrage with less than 5 figures, not worth the hassle of the wait nor the money you lose in withdraw fixed fees with the different banks, etc.



1000. Post 2971115 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Well, the one that took us here was a nice +BTC1k dump Wink




1001. Post 2972514 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: Voktar on August 20, 2013, 03:10:29 PM
<images removed>

An economist would say that the bid sum is clearly on a trajectory to infinity, and the ask sum to zero  

Or "healthy amount of fiat in the order book, but supply of coins declining fast" - that should take the Gox price higher. If and when it touches $130ish at Gox, and if the spread with Bitstamp is still 15% of higher, I will try for sure some arbitrage. The opportunity is too big not to try.

It's gonna touch $130  Grin
TBH I don't think $130-$136 is such-  big deal ... might take a couple of days to push through it, but S3052 and Vokain's Head and Shoulder Bottom is totally in play now, which would give target of about $160. Given the supply constraints and the constant buying pressure that could play out relatively quickly.

Definitely worth an arbitrage shot. I'll sell, ask for a withdrawal and see if it clears out quickly. If it does, there is a ton of money in arbitrage to be done.

Don't understand why you don't just ask for a (small) withdrawal now if you want to test Gox. Or are you assuming that a bigger one will clear quicker and you don't want to move that much out right now ?

Exactly. Back in the day, when I started using Gox, I "tested" it with a 100€ withdraw. That indeed took longer (10 business days or so at least), plus I had the unpleasant surprise to receive into my account only 65€ because of the various fees. But at least I touched with my hands they were "legit". Moths after that (post bubble obviously, after the big profits were met) I started making bigger and bigger withdraws, and they cleared super-fast. Heck, during the Dwolla aftermath with everybody complaining about huge SEPA delays I made 3 separate withdraws: 2 of them arrived to my account in 2 days and one of them in 3 days. To shut up the "I don't believe you" crowd and to be ready in case somebody wishes to bet I'm a liar I just posted the exact dates here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=179586.msg2970683#msg2970683

I will quote them here too:

Quote
WITHDRAW 1: requested June 3th, received on June 6th
WITHDRAW 2: requested June 4th, received on June 6th
WITHDRAW 3: requested June 9th, received on June 11th

So, if I'm going to take the risk to test how fast is Gox 2 months later my last withdraw to make arbitrage, I want to do it for a good profit - plus my experience tells me the bigger is the withdraw, the faster it clears. Thus for me there is no point in making arbitrage with less than 5 figures, not worth the hassle of the wait nor the money you lose in withdraw fixed fees with the different banks, etc.

Hey Rampion, tell me if your withdrawal from Gox takes now a few working days please. Because i'm waiting for a 900€ withdrawal since 15 of july (more than a month now), so if yours arrives first there is something i don't understand in all of this.

Regards.

I'll try if we break $130 consistently and the spread with Bitstamp is %15 or higher - if the conditions are met I'll report back for sure.



1002. Post 2972580 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

Quote from: ardana123 on August 20, 2013, 03:55:12 PM
Some important info is expected to be revealed about the fed tapering issue tomorrow - what do you guys think the outcome will be? Will the fed effectively taper or not in september?

I'd say that if we see a significant movement in the market prior to the announcement, then it will indeed be (somewhat) relevant.



1003. Post 2979921 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.13h):

It looks like some negative momentum is building up.



1004. Post 2991333 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Indicators scream "down" ATM, this should be definitely a spot to be in fiat.

Nevertheless, this is Bitcoin - are the whales that have been regularly buying between BTC1,000 and BTC2,000 the last few days finished their buying? Are they waiting for the ask side to build and the spot price to go down, as its happening right now, before the next buys?

Really, trading in this market ATM is pure gambling.



1005. Post 2991357 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Nice BTC940.25 miniwall at $120.42792



1006. Post 2991519 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on August 23, 2013, 07:49:54 AM
Indicators scream "down" ATM, this should be definitely a spot to be in fiat.

Nevertheless, this is Bitcoin - are the whales that have been regularly buying between BTC1,000 and BTC2,000 the last few days finished their buying? Are they waiting for the ask side to build and the spot price to go down, as its happening right now, before the next buys?

Really, trading in this market ATM is pure gambling.

Indicators have pointed to down (on the daily chart) for a few days now. But, with the spread between the 2 big exchanges and no money being able to be taken out of GOX, how reliable are the indicators? We are seeing something new here imo. The weekly chart is still looking bullish.

I agree in that it is a gamble. But, it seems like what you say has been true; The whale(s) come along and buy every 3 days or so to support the price. If I went by the indicators the last two times (I remember this) I would have missed one or both up moves. So yes, a gamble. Buy and hold (and hope)? Or wait in fiat and hope? Hmmmm...



Well, I wouldn't be so sure about "no money out of Gox". In fact, they just changed the "up to three weeks" on the withdrawal page for SEPA to "one week", and many reports of successful SEPA withdrawals are being reported. And the spread diminishing should be arbitragers at work.



1007. Post 2991686 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: tutkarz on August 23, 2013, 09:12:53 AM


arbitrage can make people to change their mind and cause crash thats why i think its stupid and selfish which in the long run will hurt everybody.

Arbitrage is stupid and selfish? Arbitrage is good money, how is that stupid? You really think that is better to have +20% spreads between exchanges?

That's beyond retarded.



1008. Post 2991798 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: Kupsi on August 23, 2013, 09:42:01 AM
Relax. It's just the weekend dip.

Is that still a thing?

Yes, look at the last month. But it's happening on thursday because people want to dump before it's coming on friday.

Well, then its time to remember (again) the amazing "Hitler got screwed by Bitcoin weekend dip and is reminiscing about his Bitcoin mining career."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4axmD2YvPnA

Every time I see it I crap my pants in laughter.



1009. Post 2993218 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Gox stable and Bitstamp rising, it looks like arbitrage is working

▲ mtgoxUSD   120.7000   108.097   +11.659%   595952
▲ bitstampUSD   109.6100   98.044   +11.797%   305108



1010. Post 3024764 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

The +BTC7800 wall at $127 looks solid. Someone is willing to purchase $1M in BTC Cheesy



1011. Post 3026426 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on August 28, 2013, 01:35:37 PM
If you mean that I'm waiting for sub 60s since 2 months ago, you are mistaken.
I sold at 120 after buying at 110, and shall buy again at the bottom of this upcoming drop,
because I believe that price will rebound enough to make a profit.
As for sub 60s, it's too early to predict that as capitulation price.
If Gox $ withdrawals return to normal (maybe, maybe not, I don't know), then a bottom at about 60 is possible.

Can you please tell us your next move so we can learn from you. Thanks.



There's a few other guys who have been remarkably silent recently Tongue

I beg you pardon?

 Grin  Grin  Grin  Grin



1012. Post 3026865 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on August 28, 2013, 01:39:53 PM
If you mean that I'm waiting for sub 60s since 2 months ago, you are mistaken.
I sold at 120 after buying at 110, and shall buy again at the bottom of this upcoming drop,
because I believe that price will rebound enough to make a profit.
As for sub 60s, it's too early to predict that as capitulation price.
If Gox $ withdrawals return to normal (maybe, maybe not, I don't know), then a bottom at about 60 is possible.

Can you please tell us your next move so we can learn from you. Thanks.



There's a few other guys who have been remarkably silent recently Tongue

I beg you pardon?

 Grin  Grin  Grin  Grin

 Tongue

LOL, love that meme! Genius Wink

Well, I obviously missed the $50s, but considering that I called that bottom from $129 (when I sold) my call was not so bad as we indeed went to $64. I bought back a little at $67-69, then I bought back in full recently at $105. Didn't manage to double my BTC because of being too bearish, but nevertheless I increased my trading stash by aprox. 50% which in my book was a better call than just holding. I would say "barely better" because I spent way too much time on daytrading....

BTW, 66% of my trading stash joined the "investment stash" on a paper wallet. I sold the remaining 33% at $120 and requested a withdrawal to try some arbitrage with Bitstamp... The money didn't arrived to my account yet, so after the last rally my arbitraging move isn't looking too good ATM.

Finally, in all honesty I also wrote many times that so many people waiting for the $50s could have meant that we weren't going there. I still believe that we will see double digits again in 2013, probably not $50 but I expect testing $79 again and if it is broken the $60s again. Nevertheless daytrading is always gambling, and in the BTC even more so. Just one whale buyer/seller can trigger huge movements, therefore TA is pretty useless in this market Smiley



1013. Post 3028233 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: bitcodo on August 28, 2013, 05:40:39 PM
AND ShroomsKit, RELAX!

Shroomsy got anxious? That's a bearish signal for sure Cheesy

Too bad I have him on ignore, I will un-ignore him right now.... No harsh feelings shroomsy.



1014. Post 3029603 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: Miz4r on August 28, 2013, 06:10:19 PM
BTW, 66% of my trading stash joined the "investment stash" on a paper wallet. I sold the remaining 33% at $120 and requested a withdrawal to try some arbitrage with Bitstamp... The money didn't arrived to my account yet, so after the last rally my arbitraging move isn't looking too good ATM.

I don't understand this move. The best way to arbitrage is to buy bitcoins on Bitstamp and sell them on Gox, doing it the other way around like you did carries a huge amount of risk since you have to wait for the funds to arrive from Gox first. Why did you try it this way? Huh

Well, because I bought back in full between $67 and $105. My trading position was all BTC, so I had to sell on Gox before buying on Bitstamp to sell again on Gox, etc. etc. etc...

Plus, the point here is to see how fast I can move fiat from Gox to Bitstamp in a recurrent way - both fiat and BTC have to move quickly for arbitrage to work. BTC is quick, fiat not so much...



1015. Post 3038412 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.14h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 29, 2013, 06:31:39 PM
the syria situation won't do jack shit to the going rate of bitcoin.
it's still too obscure for that, anyone else thinking otherwise is retarded

can someone tell me why they are fighting...

why do they want this  President Bashar al-Assad, to quit

and why does President Bashar al-Assad feel he is so important that people should die rather then he step down.

also wtf does the US have to do with this? i mean why are they invloed, what in it for them


i'm going to start and OT thread...



oh ok...

Its a good summary, Syria has an enormous strategic importance in the area for geopolitical reasons.

You know how this works: the bad guys are supposed to be the muslim fundamentalist, Al Qaeda and such (you know, those who organized 9/11 and all that stuff), but they were also our friends when there was a war to be fought against the commies, or right now, as we need to destroy a moderate Muslim country like Syria together with our beloved allies the Islamic fundamentalists from Saudi Arabia... Its all about oil and taking a strong position in the area, as the China/Iran/Russia fellowship is making a lot of money there and you know this is all about money, right?

Anyhow, good thing we have those Al-Qaeda guys, they are our ace up in the sleeve, when we need to terrorize our citizens we use them, when we need to take down a Government here and there we use them too, and at the end of the day this is why they exist!



1016. Post 3078800 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: JimboToronto on September 04, 2013, 09:47:11 AM
Wow. Just woke up, saw a .5k askwall on 145, went to the can, came back and it was eaten. Volume back to a trickle again.

Some whale(s) is a control freak.

what whale? The biggest buy was 300ish BTC, and in the last hour the total volume is roughly 1k BTC. Those are not whales, those are mice.



1017. Post 3083843 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on September 04, 2013, 10:43:57 PM
If only you guys just received the call I did. I would be buying if I were you.

"Adam, this is Mike from eBay and we would like it if you could call me back. As a seller of bitcoin on eBay we would love to get some feedback and input about your experience with bitcoin as we work to incorporate it into eBay"

After I called him back and we had a nice discussion he closed the phone call with "well we are just trying to wrap ourselves around it and want to try and stay ahead of the curve just like I think most larger corporations are right now, thank you for your time."

For any doubters my eBay user name is Jamsolid101 you can see that I was a very active seller of Casascius coins. I imagine contacting their users who actively sold bitcoins on ebay is the first step in their leading upto determining whether or not to actually incorporate it.

There may be some bounces coming but if eBay signs on for BTC there is one very large very green upward movement coming.

You heard it here first. 9/4/2013 eBay is moving toward utilizing and/or allowing bitcoins to freely be bought and sold and/or incorporating it as a payment method via PayPal.

"Mike" from EBay asking you about the anonymous cash of the interwebz? And you didn't ask him his last name and position in the company?

Sounds good btw



1018. Post 3083989 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

But does "mike" from eBay has a last name and position in the company or is he just a customer care guy who collects "user feedback" regarding a strategic issue with profound implications as it would be the adoption of an universal, decentralized currency which also happens to be a "PayPal killer"?



1019. Post 3085868 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Going back to the "mike from ebay" thing: nightowlace story didn't seem a lie to me, I was just amazed that he did not ask more info (last name and position) to the guy making the questions - now I see he did.

Nevertheless, I still cannot understand how Paypal/Ebay could be seriously thinking about integrating Bitcoin - it's totally against their interests. Come on: irreversible transfers, decentralized currency, pseudoanonymity? It's a Paypal antagonist, I really cannot see how they could support BTC, it is completely opposite to their philosophy - in fact, aren't Paypal and Ebay jerking around with people dealing with BTC?

As I said when I saw the CEO of Paypal speaking about BTC: I'm very sure those guys are looking closely to BTC, but IMO they would develop their own proprietary crypto, they wouldn't embrace BTC as it is.



1020. Post 3086138 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: MickeyT2008 on September 05, 2013, 08:07:28 AM
Nah. Bitcoin is too Communist for eBay.

Tell that to the libertarians here Wink
It seems very capitalistic to me.  As with any other currency, there's a small number of people with huge stashes ruining things for everyone else, such as by dirty tricks like dumping about 25000BTC onto a rising market last night, and manipulating the price with huge ask/bid walls.

Its not communist or capitalist - its just a currency. It is for sure a demon for Keynesianists, which usually label themselves as "left wing economists", as the ability to inflate the currency is a must for the Keynesianist "stimulus strategy" in crisis times, which is a central point of Keynesianism.

That said, a communist government would never accept a national currency they cannot fully control - on the contrary, libertarian capitalists or more generially austrian echonomy followers would embrace it with joy.

Anyhow, I can see anarchists/communists/anti-capitalists supporting Bitcoin just because is a "bank killer", and right now the financial elites are the ones ruling the world, so we could say that Bitcoin could turn upside down the current status quo, which might be a desiderable intermediate step for communists/anarchists/anti-capitalists in general. Bitcoin would never been the end goal for anti-capitalists, but it could be a first step to radically change the power balances in the world.



1021. Post 3086496 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on September 05, 2013, 09:18:52 AM
I did some digging and the video can be found on eBays own servers as well. I'm not sure who is allowed to post in this blog though (are all the posts from eBay employees?).

http://deals.ebay.com/blog/whats-the-deal-with-bitcoins-anyway/

Pictures are hosted on edccdn.com, a private host by some guy.
Notice how this isn't linked to the deal.ebay.com/blog site anywhere. My best guess is it's a rouge admin.

This blog post is completely embedded as an iframe:
http://edccdn.com/bitcoin/


Thanks, that makes it even more fishy.

To the guy responsible for this, (I'm pretty sure he read this): You dun' goofed.

Yep, "consequences will never be the same"

LOL Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1022. Post 3087214 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on September 05, 2013, 11:51:03 AM
When I got the voicemail that was my first concern. I assumed this was a follow up to the locking oft PayPal account and funds being held. I called my friend who introduced me to PayPal in late 2011. I told him that I didn't know if I felt comfortable with making a call like this to discuss a matter that had been settled. He said a call wouldn't hurt.

When I called back Mike was very nice. He stated that I have sold a lot of Bitcoin on eBay and wanted to know my experience with it and was it positive. I told him that it was a very good experience up until the PayPal incident. I let him know that I thought eBay was one of the quickest and easiest methods for people to acquire bitcoin because they already have accounts and funds attached so purchasing was easy an instant and most people don't want to wait when they want something. We laughed about living in a world where everything has to be "right now". He mentioned that they were considering policy changes to allow it to be sold but he stated that "we can't ask our user to register with Fincen" I agreed its too costly. We then discussed that campbx only makes you register your KYC and AML info if it is above $1,000 per day per person so maybe there is a level of sales they could permit without being a MSB? He said that was a good question and believes it may be a $1,000 threshold. Then we spoke about PayPal already being a MSB so when I sell something to someone abroad and they pay in Euros I don't receive Euros I receive USD so why couldn't PayPal convert the currency a user paid with to BTC and transfer me BTC for BTC? If I sold a bitcoin/Casascius coin for $200 and BTC was $100 at the time of payment they convert it and send me 2BTC instead of USD. Or instead of making that complicated since the payment was being made to PayPal who is a MSB and then transferred to me wouldn't that mean only Paypal had to be the MSB? We spoke a little more about it and he said they are just trying to wrap themselves around it and stay out front.

Like I said I would love to have any hero member call today and verify it to be a truthful conversation. It's pretty simple call him up and say "My acquaintance Adam Graham said that you reached out to him regarding Bitcoin and possibly allowing some use of it on eBay and PayPal and he suggested I give you a call, he felt I would be better equipped to handle some of your questions regarding it as I have been involved with bitcoin for quite sometime" and see where the conversation goes.

I think we will see a policy update in the near future allowing virtual currency sales in small amounts that don't violate Fincen guidelines and possibly BTC integrated into the PayPal system. BTC could easily be integrated into PayPal because you would still need a physical currency funding source attached to your account and if a claim was filed against you and they paid you $200 USD worth of BTC at the time of sale they would simply take $200 USD out of your fiat account. It's not that difficult if you think about it. User pays $200 USD PayPal sends $200 BTC, user files claim and wins, PayPal deducts $200 from your fiat account.

So who is going to call and verify I am telling the truth that I received a call regarding this?

Michael Carson's duties at Ebay (taken from his Linkedin profile):

Quote
- Responsible for developing and implementing policies to effectively manage regulatory, industry and brand risks.
- Interface with third parties, including government officials, law enforcement, trade groups and individual companies.

Sweet Cheesy



1023. Post 3087319 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: Loozik on September 05, 2013, 12:30:49 PM
I got burned too last night (was on a date and couldn't really respond to alerts, watched in horror as price plummeted on my iphone notification centre while kissing this girl at a bar, my hands were full and I wanted to do a market sell at 138. Lost a few hundred dollars in that respect and dropped an extra hundred on this date so last night was an expensive one for me but worth it Smiley

You lost because only stone age types of orders are available at MtGox.

Had you been able to put a stop loss, your trade wouldn't have turned out a mess.

Stop loss? WTF? There are no stop losses when you trade Magic The Gathering cards. What did you think this was - forex?

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1024. Post 3087638 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

The mike from ebay guy is heavily involved in Paypal too, just Google his full name.

I still cannot believe they are seriously considering integrating BTC, that would be like AT&T selling phones with an open source version of Skype pre-installed  in order "to be ahead of the curve".

It just does not make sense for Paypal/Ebay. On the other hand a Paypal proprietary crypto would make much more sense.



1025. Post 3088430 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: chodpaba on September 05, 2013, 01:26:05 PM
Nah. Bitcoin is too Communist for eBay.

Tell that to the libertarians here Wink
It seems very capitalistic to me.  As with any other currency, there's a small number of people with huge stashes ruining things for everyone else, such as by dirty tricks like dumping about 25000BTC onto a rising market last night, and manipulating the price with huge ask/bid walls.

Its not communist or capitalist - its just a currency. It is for sure a demon for Keynesianists, which usually label themselves as "left wing economists", as the ability to inflate the currency is a must for the Keynesianist "stimulus strategy" in crisis times, which is a central point of Keynesianism.

That said, a communist government would never accept a national currency they cannot fully control - on the contrary, libertarian capitalists or more generially austrian echonomy followers would embrace it with joy.

Anyhow, I can see anarchists/communists/anti-capitalists supporting Bitcoin just because is a "bank killer", and right now the financial elites are the ones ruling the world, so we could say that Bitcoin could turn upside down the current status quo, which might be a desiderable intermediate step for communists/anarchists/anti-capitalists in general. Bitcoin would never been the end goal for anti-capitalists, but it could be a first step to radically change the power balances in the world.

Who owns Bitcoin?

It is Anarcho Syndicalist.

Communism simply means that workers control the means of production, instead of a State (Nationalism), or rentiers (Capitalism).

Communism isn't a dirty word. Get over it.

And Keynsian economics just means that you have a bigger toolbox, it does not preclude other economic systems.

Sorry, but no.

Anarcho-syndicalism = workers control the means of production. You work in a factory - you control directly the production process, you participate directly in the decision making and you OWN the fruit of your labour.

Communism = social ownership of means of production. It might seem similar, but its not at all - as a worker you do not "own" the means of production nor the fruits of your labour in a communist system, the "society" does, which basically means that the State owns them. That's why Bakunin said communism was going to be "the biggest lie of the Century", and it even said communism was just a form of "state capitalism", as the worker did not control the means of production nor the fruit of his labour. An exception would be Pannekoek's council communism, which was totally opposed to russian bolshevism, and was in many ways much closer to Kropotkin's and Bakunnin's anarcho-communism.

And again: Bitcoin is just a currency, and it has no political sign - but saying is "anarcho-syndicalist" is simply wrong. Most of original anarchists (or "left" anarchists, as some would say, especially in the US) wouldn't even use money as we know it (an exception would be Proudhon's mutualism), in fact during the most relevant anarcho-syndicalist experience in history (Aragón, Spain: 1930-1938) the "Peseta" of the Spanish Republica was not used at all. They had no currency nor legal tender, they just seldomly issued their own "money" which were just vouchers or IOU's with very specific uses. And BTW: anarcho-syndicalism is just a WAY or STRATEGY to reach "anarchy", or "anarcho-communism" or "libertarian communism", as many US folks like to name them to distinguish them from their very own, ill-named "anarcho-capitalism")

Fascinating experience BTW (the one in Aragón), it was a pity that both the spanish fascists and the KPSS (Russian communists) joined forced to crush what could have been one of the most relevant and game-changing revolutions in Europe's history.

Sorry of the OT, folks.







1026. Post 3088567 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: chodpaba on September 05, 2013, 03:33:28 PM
Nah. Bitcoin is too Communist for eBay.

Tell that to the libertarians here Wink
It seems very capitalistic to me.  As with any other currency, there's a small number of people with huge stashes ruining things for everyone else, such as by dirty tricks like dumping about 25000BTC onto a rising market last night, and manipulating the price with huge ask/bid walls.

Its not communist or capitalist - its just a currency. It is for sure a demon for Keynesianists, which usually label themselves as "left wing economists", as the ability to inflate the currency is a must for the Keynesianist "stimulus strategy" in crisis times, which is a central point of Keynesianism.

That said, a communist government would never accept a national currency they cannot fully control - on the contrary, libertarian capitalists or more generially austrian echonomy followers would embrace it with joy.

Anyhow, I can see anarchists/communists/anti-capitalists supporting Bitcoin just because is a "bank killer", and right now the financial elites are the ones ruling the world, so we could say that Bitcoin could turn upside down the current status quo, which might be a desiderable intermediate step for communists/anarchists/anti-capitalists in general. Bitcoin would never been the end goal for anti-capitalists, but it could be a first step to radically change the power balances in the world.

Who owns Bitcoin?

It is Anarcho Syndicalist.

Communism simply means that workers control the means of production, instead of a State (Nationalism), or rentiers (Capitalism).

Communism isn't a dirty word. Get over it.

And Keynsian economics just means that you have a bigger toolbox, it does not preclude other economic systems.

Sorry, but no.

Anarcho-syndicalism = workers control the means of production. You work in a factory - you control directly the production process, you participate directly in the decision making and you OWN the fruit of your labour.

Communism = social ownership of means of production. It might seem similar, but its not at all - as a worker you do not "own" the means of production nor the fruits of your labour in a communist system, the "society" does, which basically means that the State owns them. That's why Bakunin said communism was going to be "the biggest lie of the Century", and it even said communism was just a form of "state capitalism", as the worker did not control the means of production nor the fruit of his labour. An exception would be Pannekoek's council communism, which was totally opposed to russian bolshevism, and was in many ways much closer to Kropotkin's anarcho-communism.

And again: Bitcoin is just a currency, and it has no political sign - but saying is "anarcho-syndicalist" is simply wrong. Most of original anarchists (or "left" anarchists, as some would say, especially in the US) wouldn't even use money as we know it (an exception would be Proudhon's mutualism), in fact during the most relevant anarcho-syndicalist experience in history (Aragón, Spain: 1930-1938) the "Peseta" of the Spanish Republica was not used at all. They had no currency nor legal tender, they just seldomly issued their own "money" which were just vouchers or IOU's with very specific uses.

Fascinating experience BTW, it was a pity that both the spanish fascists and the KPSS (Russian communists) joined forced to crush what could have been one of the most relevant and game-changing revolutions in Europe's history.

Sorry of the OT, folks.






You can find those definitions variously applied by your choice of authority. It does not detract from my point, which is that eBay has no intention of empowering any sort of democratic, actually PtoP, technology without the ability to insert their very heavy hand. Their recent activity with Mailpile is just one indication of this.

My choice of authorities regarding anarchism and communism are Marx, Engels, Pannaekok, Trotsky, Lenin, Gramsci, Bakunin, Proudhon, Kropotkin, Rudolf Rocker, Diego Abad de Santillana and a long etcetera, and they all agree on the definitions. Oh, and they also agree on being anti-capitalists... And finally, they also agree that for a total liberation money needs to cease to exist. For bolshevics, that would happen in the "final" stage of the revolution (anarchy or libertarian communism). For anarchists, from the very first moment. That's why stating that a currency (BTC) is "communist" or "anarcho-syndicalist" (which BTW is just a strategy to reach anarcho-collectivism) is quite strange.



1027. Post 3088707 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: chodpaba on September 05, 2013, 03:48:29 PM

Not that it matters, but to be clear, I am a Critical Marxist.

Which means I don't play fair.

Taking into account that, among other many things, the very meaning of the world capitalism (=private ownership of means of production) was defined by Marx in "The Capital", its simply a shame that almost nobody under 50 has read that work. You really cannot understand the history of the last 200 years without having read it.



1028. Post 3088783 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: herzmeister on September 05, 2013, 03:46:10 PM

quite exactly, and fuck OT, everyone must have watched this at least once:


Living Utopia (The Anarchists & The Spanish Revolution)


Nice doc. indeed, I've watched it at least 5 times. I strongly recommend you the following book by the british historian Kelsey Graham:

Anarchosyndicalism, Libertarian Communism and the State: The CNT in Zaragoza and Aragon, 1930-1937

It's the deepest and more precise account of what happened in Aragón during the anarchist revolution, and it's written in that meticulous, thorough, cold and objective style that only British historians can achieve Wink



1029. Post 3088805 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: chodpaba on September 05, 2013, 04:11:29 PM

Not that it matters, but to be clear, I am a Critical Marxist.

Which means I don't play fair.

Taking into account that, among other many things, the very meaning of the world capitalism (=private ownership of means of production) was defined by Marx in "The Capital", its simply a shame that almost nobody under 50 has read that work. You really cannot understand the history of the last 200 years without having read it.

I have read it.

And Marxism, and Capitalism have moved on.

So... You are a capitalist marxist? Wow, that would be a nice evolution indeed Wink



1030. Post 3088987 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: chodpaba on September 05, 2013, 04:19:10 PM

Not that it matters, but to be clear, I am a Critical Marxist.

Which means I don't play fair.

Taking into account that, among other many things, the very meaning of the world capitalism (=private ownership of means of production) was defined by Marx in "The Capital", its simply a shame that almost nobody under 50 has read that work. You really cannot understand the history of the last 200 years without having read it.

I have read it.

And Marxism, and Capitalism have moved on.

So... You are a capitalist marxist? Wow, that would be a nice evolution indeed Wink

In the best tradition of Milton Friedman. The grand architect of modern central planning.

Wow, I could write 10 posts about this, but lets respect the other folks as this is heavily OT. We should start a thread perhaps. Let me just tell you that Marx would probably profoundly despise Friedman (and all New Keynesianism, BTW) if he'd be alive. You just cannot believe in a "better" or "heathy" capitalism if you think Marx's analysis is correct. And its a matter of fact that nobody did such a big favor to capitalism as New Keynesianists like Friedman.

Back on topic: I really cannot see where the market is going ATM. Until Gox solves his problems, the spread between exchanges goes back to normal, and people can normally receive their fiat, any kind of technical analysis is just pointless IMO.



1031. Post 3092723 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Funny to see how there is such a downward pressure when  Gox didn't solve yet its problems.

I always reported when the withdrawals came through fast, now I have to say I have been waiting exactly 2 weeks for a SEPA withdrawal and still nothing.

My guess is that if and when they solve their withdrawal problems there will be dumping.



1032. Post 3095112 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: chodpaba on September 06, 2013, 02:16:14 PM
The only thing that shocks me is that any of this is news

Exactly the same sentiment here. How is this news? Like the Prism program... Or the Wikileaks "shocking discoveries"....



1033. Post 3123182 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

One hour without a single trade at Gox.

DDoS? Not looking good.



1034. Post 3123212 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: Odalv on September 10, 2013, 04:57:30 PM
One hour without a single trade at Gox.

DDoS? Not looking good.

Gox is down

502 Bad Gateway


It has been completely down for one hour down. Normally, when there is a DDoS some trades come through... Now, not a single trade in exactly one hour. Not a single update on Gox or Twitter. Didn't check IRC, but its not looking too good.



1035. Post 3140442 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: mccorvic on September 12, 2013, 06:32:18 PM
ooh ... whale showing a fin again  Cheesy

When did this obsession with the Whale God start? It's like, any time anything happens it's "because whale!" Some of you sound like you'd sacrifice children on an alter of fiat money if someone told you it would make the Whale Gods happy.

We don't need no stinkin' whales.

Well we got em whether you like it or not ...

I'm not denying that there are people who can buy/sell chunks of BTC. I'm not denying that there are people who own 100 bagazillion BTC. Of course there are.

It's the attitude this thread has of this strange cult-like worship and  pretending that the fate of bitcoin relies on the whimsies of such people that bothers me.  

Is a fact that the lower the volume is (and its been getting lower for months now), the more the market is driven by fewer, relatively bigger trades.



1036. Post 3140707 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: mccorvic on September 12, 2013, 10:27:38 PM
Luckily, I also don't believe in THEY.  

The majority your flock does though.
My prediction for 2013 was a high of $16.

You really got it right, mate...



1037. Post 3140751 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: MoreFun on September 12, 2013, 10:41:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUGgdov5P6g

lmao,

 if anyone falls for this ....

Good one...  Grin Only the owner of the address will be able to count the sheeps.

LOOOOOL

"Backwards compatable"

"send all your Bitcoins to the official Bitcoin address"

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1038. Post 3140854 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Check this out (Gox's answer to Coinlab's suit - TL;DR: they are saying they are short of an additional $5M, NOT including Dwolla and DHS):

http://numismatics.pwnz.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/MtGox-Answer.pdf

Quote
Defendants are informed and believe that in March and April, 2013 MtGox customers, at the
suggestion of CoinLab, deposited $12,788,701.08 into one or more CoinLab bank accounts;
CoinLab then caused the amount of such funds to be credited to such customers' MtGox
accounts but CoinLab did not transfer the actual funds into the MtGox bank account. As a
result, such customers' MtGox account reflected a higher amount of currency funds available
to such customers than were actually in the MtGox bank account. In April, 2013, and upon
the demand of MtGox, CoinLab transferred a portion of those amounts, $ 7,473,490.29, to the
MtGox bank account, leaving a balance of approximately $ 5,315,210.79 to be transferred to
the MtGox account and which is being wrongfully held by CoinLab.

I read this as VERY BAD news. "Overwhelming" the biggest bank in Japan my ass... The +$14M on Gox's order book, plus whatever is "dormant" or in the withdrawal queue, and therefore all our Gox balances..... Are backed only by thin air.



1039. Post 3140903 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: marcelus on September 12, 2013, 11:07:45 PM
Check this out (Gox's answer to Coinlab's suit - TL;DR: they are saying they are short of an additional $5M, NOT including Dwolla and DHS):

http://numismatics.pwnz.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/MtGox-Answer.pdf

Quote
Defendants are informed and believe that in March and April, 2013 MtGox customers, at the
suggestion of CoinLab, deposited $12,788,701.08 into one or more CoinLab bank accounts;
CoinLab then caused the amount of such funds to be credited to such customers' MtGox
accounts but CoinLab did not transfer the actual funds into the MtGox bank account. As a
result, such customers' MtGox account reflected a higher amount of currency funds available
to such customers than were actually in the MtGox bank account. In April, 2013, and upon
the demand of MtGox, CoinLab transferred a portion of those amounts, $ 7,473,490.29, to the
MtGox bank account, leaving a balance of approximately $ 5,315,210.79 to be transferred to
the MtGox account and which is being wrongfully held by CoinLab.

I read this as VERY BAD news. "Overwhelming" the biggest bank in Japan my ass... The +$14M on Gox's order book, plus whatever is "dormant" or in the withdrawal queue, and therefore all our Gox balances..... Are backed only by thin air.

Can you elaborate on the 'overwhelming the biggest bank' part? I'm confused as to its meaning.

That's one of the absurd excuses Gox is pulling out of its ass to justify delayed transfers.



1040. Post 3140911 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Emphasized version (just loving the drama):

Quote
Defendants are informed and believe that in March and April, 2013 MtGox customers, at the
suggestion of CoinLab, deposited $12,788,701.08 into one or more CoinLab bank accounts;
CoinLab then caused the amount of such funds to be credited to such customers' MtGox
accounts but CoinLab did not transfer the actual funds into the MtGox bank account
. As a
result, such customers' MtGox account reflected a higher amount of currency funds available
to such customers than were actually in the MtGox bank account.
In April, 2013, and upon
the demand of MtGox, CoinLab transferred a portion of those amounts, $ 7,473,490.29, to the
MtGox bank account, leaving a balance of approximately $ 5,315,210.79 to be transferred to
the MtGox account and which is being wrongfully held by CoinLab.



1041. Post 3141032 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.15h):

Quote from: hmmmstrange on September 12, 2013, 11:34:45 PM
Check this out (Gox's answer to Coinlab's suit - TL;DR: they are saying they are short of an additional $5M, NOT including Dwolla and DHS):

http://numismatics.pwnz.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/MtGox-Answer.pdf

Quote
Defendants are informed and believe that in March and April, 2013 MtGox customers, at the
suggestion of CoinLab, deposited $12,788,701.08 into one or more CoinLab bank accounts;
CoinLab then caused the amount of such funds to be credited to such customers' MtGox
accounts but CoinLab did not transfer the actual funds into the MtGox bank account. As a
result, such customers' MtGox account reflected a higher amount of currency funds available
to such customers than were actually in the MtGox bank account. In April, 2013, and upon
the demand of MtGox, CoinLab transferred a portion of those amounts, $ 7,473,490.29, to the
MtGox bank account, leaving a balance of approximately $ 5,315,210.79 to be transferred to
the MtGox account and which is being wrongfully held by CoinLab.

I read this as VERY BAD news. "Overwhelming" the biggest bank in Japan my ass... The +$14M on Gox's order book, plus whatever is "dormant" or in the withdrawal queue, and therefore all our Gox balances..... Are backed only by thin air.

Let me get this straight. Mt.Gox was stiffed $5 million by coinlab and another $5 million by the US gov.. That's over $10 million of missing funds on Mt.Gox.

....funds that are nevertheless credited on our Gox balances.




1042. Post 3161211 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: prof7bit on September 15, 2013, 03:14:05 PM
Mentioned by wonkytonky elsewhere.
Look what happened on Sept 4th, the last time they kissed.

Bid-Sum and Ask-Sum are on different Y-Axis, they cannot touch or cross each other, they live in totally different dimensions.

That's absolutely right.



1043. Post 3161324 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on September 15, 2013, 08:11:45 PM
Mentioned by wonkytonky elsewhere.
Look what happened on Sept 4th, the last time they kissed.

Bid-Sum and Ask-Sum are on different Y-Axis, they cannot touch or cross each other, they live in totally different dimensions.

That's absolutely right.

Well, live and learn. I found the mention interesting.

You long these days?

Mostly, I dont like trading in this market because is too unpredictable. Volume is low and there is a scarcity of coins which IMO is artificially produced by Gox's problems. On the other side, the order book at Bitstamp, especially the bid side, is a joke.

I tried to arbitrage with a few k's and I failed miserably. 3 weeks waiting for Gox's fiat until I cancelled the withdrawal. Ill a wait a little to see if I can buy cheaper, and then I'm leaving Gox until they solve their liquidity problems.



1044. Post 3164276 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on September 16, 2013, 02:08:40 AM
Seems to me like the amount of value being traded has, when you take into account prices, increased. I mean 50k coins at $10 each is less then 5k at $130.
Which is already reflected in the higher price. IMO BTC volume is the appropriate indicator.

Agreed. And we are preaching an all time low in terms of coin supply at Gox. It looks to me that there's very little new fiat going to Gox, and very little coins being offered.



1045. Post 3164979 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: rpietila on September 16, 2013, 07:51:26 AM
Seems to me like the amount of value being traded has, when you take into account prices, increased. I mean 50k coins at $10 each is less then 5k at $130.
Which is already reflected in the higher price. IMO BTC volume is the appropriate indicator.

Agreed. And we are preaching an all time low in terms of coin supply at Gox. It looks to me that there's very little new fiat going to Gox, and very little coins being offered.

I (for one) cannot currently justify using Gox for storing either fiat or BTC. I did store 1000+ BTC there for more than a year so apparently I trusted them more back then, (or BTC was cheaper..)

- No real reason to buy from there, as Bitstamp's liquidity is enough for me.

- Feels risky to sell there, since I am waiting for my first withdrawal.

Meanwhile:

- Localbitcoins has grown a lot and is already a major source of volume.

- Bittiraha.fi in Finland is doing more volume extraexchange.

- I am also back to work, doing OTC.  

We are moving away from Gox-centric world. In my observance, the total volume we have now, is actually brisk when taking into account the insecurity concerning Gox, the holiday season, and the aftermath of the minibubble in April:

http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#igWeeklyztgSzm1g10zm2g25zvzl

(It is increasingly more evident that there never was a bubble in 2013, not any more than the Pirate event in 2012. The only bubble Bitcoin has experienced so far was in June 2011, and that was a bear trap. Bulls made anything north of 300% in 2 years =) )

Glad you are back, the truth is we need OTC more than ever. Hope to do my first trade with you soon.



1046. Post 3232176 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on September 25, 2013, 02:45:13 PM
It's not speculation which the liberty reserve case clearly shows. If you don't verify customers using "imaginary internet money" you are a target of the US. The reason is that users could be from the US using a VPN etc to access your service, if you don't verify customers you have no way of ensuring that. So you MUST, with no exception, verify all customers. All business must do this, and those who don't will risk ending up like liberty reserve.

liberty reserve was handling real life money

BTC is imaginary internet money

From what i heard the US was only interested in tracking USD going in and out of exchanges not BTC

Actually no. From my understanding, LRUSD was an "imaginary internet currency" and not backed by actual USD. Yes, exchangers would trade it for USD, but there was no actual reserve guarantee. That is what makes this case so interesting. Liberty Reserve was basically a centralized version of bitcoin.

Exactly.



1047. Post 3241058 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Miz4r on September 26, 2013, 05:20:07 PM
But when everyone's convinced that it will go down because everyone seems to be convinced it will go up, where will it go?




1048. Post 3245185 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on September 26, 2013, 10:41:13 PM
Everyone wants Bitcoin to spread so they can sell high after the big jump.

I'm not looking to sell ever. That is my ideal scenario.

I guess we're different then. Because I'm not gonna die with em in my pocket.  Grin

Me neither. I just have no intention of swapping them for monopoly money. Bitcoin is money, you don't sell it, you spend it! Wink

If there were hookers & blow available close by for btc then I'd probably agree with you. I'm sure as hell not leavin em to my kids! They can pay for their own blow. lol

Patience, hoes will wise up Wink

Hoes are already accepting BTC. I cannot link the article because I'm on my cell, but on I read an article on avn.com about a whorehouse in UK officially accepting BTC.



1049. Post 3247128 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: smoothie on September 27, 2013, 08:45:36 AM
This thread should get a special chatbox on the forum.

Totally agree.



1050. Post 3248394 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: RationalSpeculator on September 27, 2013, 04:15:52 PM
Is it honest analyses?
its common sense at this point.... tho my TA has been pointing to this outcome. join the my newsletter!


Or just pumping?

pumping? no i would never do that ...  Cheesy


How is your track record?

if you take away all the bad calls i've made, unbelievably good!

that made me smile Smiley

thanks

That's the purpose of 99% of Adam's posts.

Plus, in 2012 he said that BTC was going to be traded above $100 this year, and pretty much everybody laughed at him. Prudhon even bet 10 BTC against that happening. As we all know Adam won, he was absolutely right, but at the end didn't want to take Prudhon's money.

This is a true story, I'm on my cell now but I'm sure somebody can find the link.

Morale of the story: historically the most radical permabulls* have ALWAYS been right both in the mid and in the long term.

*we will have to exclude rpietila, that case falls in the realm of delusions and mental sicknesses.



1051. Post 3248642 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Holliday on September 27, 2013, 04:52:07 PM
How is your track record?

Adam was a bear earlier this year at $20.

It might have made some very specific bearish calls for the very short term, mostly as a joke, but our good old adam is the prototypical permabull, you can't deny that Wink



1052. Post 3285652 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on October 02, 2013, 03:50:22 PM
Silk Road admin arrested and servers seized:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=306331.0

If true, this could have some impact on price.

I just sold a bunch of coins.

HOLY SHIT

IT IS TRUE

Look at the linkedin of the guy, read his bio, the Walter White kind of guy: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rossulbricht



1053. Post 3285743 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Look at the linkedin profile of the guy, the Walter White type of character: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rossulbricht

And here you have the indictment: http://krebsonsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/UlbrichtCriminalComplaint.pdf



1054. Post 3285982 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

WOW

Read the indictment. They are monitoring these forums (and much more), they looked how a guy called "altoid" mentioned SR very early on, he had registered that account with his real email (BTW, Theymos: how did they get the email through which he registered his btctalk account?). So they thoroughly monitored "Ross Ulbricht", and they realized he had the same interests of DPR - they wrote about the same books, liked the same videos... So they started to follow his moves... And they caught him.

They are watching.

Plus, its incredible creepy how DPR hired a murder of a canadian guy, he paid 1500 BTC for it and received a pic of the corpse of the guy. What a piece of shit, I lost all respect for him.



1055. Post 3286141 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

This:





1056. Post 3286243 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: Tzupy on October 02, 2013, 05:03:22 PM
If the feds made the connection in 2011, what took them so long to find DPR?
Just in case you read my post, I don't do drugs, never did, never will.  Grin

Well, they did not "make the connection", they just started to monitor the guy, as they are probably monitoring hundreds if not thousands of users in these (and many other) forums. They realized that Ross Ullbricht read the same books as DPR, that he like the same youtube videos, that wrote in a similar way... So they waited until they caught him receiving fake ID's and such.

I hope you all realize that being on the internet is like being naked in the middle of your town's main street. If you have something to hide, better not being online at all.



1057. Post 3286284 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on October 02, 2013, 05:08:52 PM
Plus, its incredible creepy how DPR hired a murder of a canadian guy, he paid 1500 BTC for it and received a pic of the corpse of the guy. What a piece of shit, I lost all respect for him.

I don't. If you try to blackmail someone that is exactly what you're asking for imo.

I strongly disagree. I personally cannot have anything else that hate and despise for someone who hires a hitman and pays upon receival of the picture of the corpse.

Read the indictment. He gives to the hitman all the details of the canadian guy, including "Wife + 3 kids".

Honestly, I'm about to vomit.



1058. Post 3286656 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

You know what?

I'm not selling a single coin. I'm lazy. I don't want to get hold of my paper wallets Cheesy



1059. Post 3286669 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.16h):

Quote from: ronaldlee0917 on October 02, 2013, 05:46:43 PM
will we see a 70s today?

I'd say YES, and probably much lower.

Fear is taking over. Enjoy the ride, and be ready to buy cheap coins Cheesy



1060. Post 3376715 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Gox is slowly running out of coins

Plenty of fiat though, I guess it's about time to get some popcorn




1061. Post 3376738 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

A longer timeframe below, we're steadily approaching all time low in asks and on the amount of bids is very high.

This could mean btc is about to explode (again) if it wasn't that the bid/ask ratio at Gox is distorted by their now quite obvious liquidity problem. Nevertheless, apart from Gox financial situation everything looks bullish Cheesy




1062. Post 3386944 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: RationalSpeculator on October 22, 2013, 12:55:02 PM
I just hate this rise. Sold too many coins Sad No trust anymore that it will go down again to $100. Maybe $130-$150 at best.

We are close to touching the old time high again. This is not 2011.

I'm eating my cake and it tastes like chit.  

Sorry to hear that.

I'm kind of nervous myself. I'm holding, all of it, waiting for the last moment to sell. I'd love to say "it looks like it's about to turn around", but in reality, I don't see any signs for that (likely to happen eventually) correction yet. Neither on stamp nor on gox. So, I'm holding.

Thanks so much Oda.

Yeah, I switched strategy to not sell anymore as it goes up. I felt it in my gut already when price moved back up from $65 to $100, as I was selling the buying was strong. I figured we just might have seen the low already and from here it's up but I didn't listen to my gut and continued to sell up to $130.

As I said many times: buy and hold has historically been a winning strategy with BTC. Daytrading BTC is a huge risk, and IMO it should be done ONLY after an obvious bubble pop that leads to a bear market, as we had from mid April to July/August.

In my book this is a very bad time to daytrade, is time to hold like a motherfucker, as I've been saying since the beginning of July. You made fun of me because of a trolly post I wrote at the beginning of April in which I suggested to a guy to hold to his BTC if he invested what he could afford to lose and didn't want to miss the opportunity of his life. I again stand correct on that post. I don't believe in risk management with BTC, I think the bigger risk is to lose a once in a lifetime opportunity to be really "all set", and the potential with BTC is so high that you don't need to invest a significant % of your wealth, by investing what you can comfortably afford to lose your life can change for real, very soon.

We are all still early adopters, even the guy buying today for the first time, but the window is starting to close, slowly. When it closes for good, it would be sudden. We are approaching ATH, and we all know what happens when we break ATH, right? Huge media exposure and back to bubble mode, and this time $1,000 will be broken in less time you need to blink your eye. What if a BTC ETF is approved by the SEC? You can image.

Sure, secure your profits. I guess that everybody who has been into Bitcoin at least for 1 year has recouped their investment and secured profits at some point. That's the sensible thing to do. But don't fuck up by daytrading when the bear market is over, now it's time to ride the choo choo train. Yeah, crashes will follow parabolic rallies, but will you be able to time that? Be careful, in this game the one with more BTC in his wallet  is the one winning.



1063. Post 3387200 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: RationalSpeculator on October 22, 2013, 01:24:04 PM
You made fun of me because of a trolly post I wrote at the beginning of April in which I suggested to a guy to hold to his BTC if he invested what he could afford to lose and didn't want to miss the opportunity of his life. I again stand correct on that post.

I did not make fun of you. I called you out on you making fun of him. I also called you out on a bad call you made. The current price being $200 or even $1000 does not turn your past short term bad calls into good ones.

We already discussed that in your thread, all has been already said. First, mine was a "trolly" post, not serious analysis. Second, I stand correct in what I told to that guy. I'm quoting that post below, that was NOT a short-term call. That was a GENERAL ADVICE, in which I still believe. Again:

Quote from: Rampion on April 08, 2013, 10:07:38 AM
I'm considering selling all of mine at the market price of $175, and waiting to see what happens next. Its so hard to decide lol. What if it hits $200? etc.

You are in BTC because of fiat profits? SELL SELL SELL

You are in BTC because of freedom? HOLD HOLD HOLD

Every BTC sold goes from weak hands to stronger hands. Just do it!

Yep, it's a trolly post. But I still believe in what I said. If you want to secure fiat profits, just SELL - I've bought my BTC when they costed around $10 - this can be a perfect time to secure profits. If you are in BTC because you want to be FREE in the future, because you want your life TO CHANGE FOR GOOD - then just hold like a motherfucker - which is what I've been doing for a few months now.

And BTW: price did HIT $200, which is what "The Mafia" was worried about. He said specifically: what if it hits $200?. That was worrying him. Well, in fact the price DID HIT $200 shortly after his post, so I really don't see how that is such a bad call. Sure, then we had a crash... And soon we will be going to the moon. Do you see any timeframe in my post? I'm just a little bitter by the fact that you opened a post just to bash me and that you chose bad examples - I've made much worst call linked to specific timeframes in the past... But again, this was already discussed.

Enjoy the ride, and I hope that you have now much more BTC than when you started buying them. That's the loss nobody can afford to have: to have less and less BTC. That's the opportunity nobody should miss in my book.



1064. Post 3387238 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: Miz4r on October 22, 2013, 01:53:14 PM
As I said many times: buy and hold has historically been a winning strategy with BTC. Daytrading BTC is a huge risk, and IMO it should be done ONLY after an obvious bubble pop that leads to a bear market, as we had from mid April to July/August.

In my book this is a very bad time to daytrade, is time to hold like a motherfucker, as I've been saying since the beginning of July.

I also remember you saying I and other bulls were in denial and we would panic and capitulate soon when we sat around $70-80 in June/July. Turned out you were horribly wrong those days, I wonder how many people lost money listening to your bearish rants. Tongue

That was a bit earlier, but its true that many times my bearish calls were wrong. First (April, post-crash) I said the very bottom was already hit ($50) and that this was in no way like 2011, then I started to doubt about this and I wrote that we would probably go to $30. It turned out I was completely right in April, and completely wrong in May. Summing up, that was a bad call from my side for sure. Nevertheless, I missed the very bottom in the hope of doubling my coins, but we WERE in a bear market indeed, and those who sold at $125 in May (which is when I sold my coins, it's all on the forums) have bought for sure cheaper coins when we went again to $60/$70. I know I did, even if I was expecting them even cheaper. At the end of the day, I ended up with more coins I had pre-bubble - I didn't triple them, I didn't double them, but I increased them by a healthy 35%. I was up to 50% at some point, then sold at the very bottom in one occasion, fucking up, but you cannot be right 100% of the time.

What I feel sorry for is for those guys who had thousands of coins in 2011, and now they have only a few hundreds. What I guarantee you is that won't happen to me. I know very well what's my goal in this game: to end up with MORE btc I had. It's easy to make fiat profits with an asset that went from sub $1 to $266 in 3 years. Even a monkey can have fiat profits by trading such an asset. The difficult thing is to end up with MORE BTC in the process, and that's my only purpose.




1065. Post 3398139 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Gentlemen, how does it feel to see your BTC double their price in just a few weeks?

Hope you are all holding, if $266 is broken next stop is beyond four digits.

Choo choo, motherfuckers!



1066. Post 3398207 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: wobber on October 23, 2013, 11:16:20 PM
Gentlemen, how does it feel to see your BTC double their price in just a few weeks?

Hope you are all holding, if $266 is broken next stop is beyond four digits.

Choo choo, motherfuckers!

I'll think of you when Bubble explodes

Bubble already exploded once (2011), somebody would say twice including the April 2013 crash, but if ATH is broken in my book that would be a correction and not a bubble pop. Yet the 2011 high was at least one order of magnitud smaller than the 2013 one.

That said, BTC is prone to boom and bust cycles, its designed to skyrocket, and even if long-term parabolic growth is unsustainable and exponencial rises always preceed steep corrections, the real *pop* is nowhere to be seen yet.

You have to be blind to not realize that we are still in the early adoption phase, the average joe has still no fucking clue on how to quickly get some BTC... When and if paper BTC is steadily available in mainstream markets then you will see what huge and scary motherfucking BTC bubble is.




1067. Post 3398271 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

Quote from: deathcode on October 23, 2013, 11:31:51 PM
Gentlemen, how does it feel to see your BTC double their price in just a few weeks?

Hope you are all holding, if $266 is broken next stop is beyond four digits.

Choo choo, motherfuckers!

I just hope you all learned from April and sell at the right time Smiley
This is not healthy anymore, this is not a correction, this is a bubble all over again. Correction was from 125 to 160, 125 to 225 is a bubble and it'll burst when we get closer to all time high or a little further, but a bubble indeed.

So you finally sold after April, 10th - right?

Honestly, BTC is a "bubble" by its very nature, 98% of its value is driven by pure speculation and we all know that. It is a promise of both freedom and future value, an awkward but very powerful promise, and this is why people is willing to blindly believe in it.

Still, your dad doesn't know how to buy BTC yet, for now the billionaires haven't throw real money at it, wait for those two things to happen and then we will be probably ready for the big pop, the one that can take us to almost 0. That's a very possible outcome for such a pure speculative asset as Bitcoin but until then enjoy the ride and try to apply a simple rule: end up with more BTC than you had earlier Smiley



1068. Post 3407807 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.18h):

A lot of talk about panic, but the fact is that the bearapocalypse fears faded away, BTC was at $100 a couple of months ago and just a few days ago it was at $130ish.

Even if we correct hard till $165ish, that would be a pretty solid short term uptrend.

If we go below the recent "stable" price of $130ish we might see some anxiety, until then I'm just seeing traders realizing profits but no fear, anxiety or panic whatsoever.

When and if the SEC approves the BTC ETF we can just go one way: up, to the moon. Fingers crossed...



1069. Post 3409921 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: deathcode on October 25, 2013, 02:51:49 PM
Anyone willing to call a bottom?



$160ish



1070. Post 3410027 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on October 25, 2013, 03:29:49 PM
SR merchants simply changed marketplaces and do the same as before

A, yeah? Then where did the 95% of my pre-SR bust sales volume go? Sheepmarket and BMR are pretty much dead at this point and don't even have a fraction of the volume SR used to have. Add a permanent DDoS of BMR to it's lack of volume and you'll start to get the picture: this industry needs at least a year to recover.

I might have misunderstood this. Did you you type that you were a Silk Road vendor?

Man, on his profile used to say "top SR vendor". It was never a secret.



1071. Post 3421631 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Bitstamp ain't gonna fix their api anytime soon?



1072. Post 3422324 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.19h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on October 27, 2013, 06:05:09 PM
Bitcoin will be trading at 10K this time next year.

No it won't. Wanna bet 100BTC?

It would be good if everyone who makes wild speculations regarding bitcoin where faced with that bet, perhaps there would be less rubbish and more sense in the community!

It's particularly funny it's rpietilla offering the bet.

Lol, he didn't take the "300k by the end of the year" bet Cheesy



1073. Post 3487623 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: seljo on November 05, 2013, 11:20:38 AM
What happens when we hit 266?  Huh

You can imagine. A lot of USD trapped on Gox, and an increasing scarcity of coins, which usually preceeds bubbles... See graph below.

After $266 -> to the moon.




1074. Post 3497336 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

The old ATH now feels like "cheap coins" just 7 months later Cheesy




1075. Post 3497545 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

here......we......go........again




1076. Post 3498004 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.20h):

Quote from: ChartBuddy on November 06, 2013, 12:01:42 PM


Nice wall at $273.



1077. Post 3507922 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 07, 2013, 09:22:54 AM
Flashcrash alert.

The rest of the week may be choppy since we are already so much higher than last week. The weekly gains tend to normalize, and I would not be surprised to see Sunday at around 280-300 like we are now.

Retest of previous ATH from the above in the form of flashcrash is probably coming. I don't believe sub-250 territory will be visited edit: except during the flashcrash.

Risk of a change in main trend is low.

Looking forward, it is better to buy now than wait. I would be wary if price goes 600+ in November or 700+ in December, since they may be overextended.

I find myself agreeing with Pietilä, which feels awkward indeed Smiley

In my opinion this rally is fueled by:

1) Huge media exposure that led to speculative mania in China (the Feb-April rally was driven by the West; this rally is driven by the Chinese)
2) Big scarcity of coins, created by a) hard decrease in mining profitability (miners are holding like mofo's); b) artificial demand on Gox due to liquidity problems.

These two things combined are taking us to the moon - and I wonder what happens when the western media wakes up to the sound of the new ATH we recently passed  Tongue

Possible negative factors leading to stagnation/crash:

- Gox going broke. Big investors still have their money there, if Gox goes busto it will be a big hit to the confidence of some whales. Nevertheless, that would slow things down, there will be a little bit of drama, but if safe alternatives come up it will just be a bump on the road.

Possible positive factors leading us to 5 figures and beyond, quickly:

- the SEC approves the Bitcoin ETF Smiley




1078. Post 3507936 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: billington.mark on November 07, 2013, 10:59:46 AM
What time is it in the USA?

4 to 6 AM

But USA does not drive shit lately. China does.



1079. Post 3510123 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: spooderman on November 07, 2013, 03:37:11 PM
It's extremely possible there could be no big crash this time around. All the people selling now expecting a 3rd crash so they can buy back in will be fucked. Most of the last crashes involved some bad news of sorts. Things tend to happen twice in bitcoin, but not a third time. Don't be surprised if all we get are mini crashes on the way up. It's a good way to take coins from the weak hands who don't know what they have.
What bad news happened before 9 April 2013 ?

a fair question. well gox getting dosd made a lot of people panic, and if enough people panic a crash becomes unstoppable.

BS. Nothing special happened. Is just that after a speculative mania period someone realized a huge chunk of profits, triggering panic sells.

This will happen again - over and over and over. Is just that the bottom will be higher and higher and higher. Until BTC finally becomes the world reserve currency or it disappears for good.



1080. Post 3513501 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

If the Bitcoin ETF is approved before the China mania pops oh boy, we are going to witness a real "perfect storm" in action

I don't really know when an answer from the SEC is expected on that matter - anybody does?



1081. Post 3520668 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Next stop, $700

That will be a good spot to secure some profits Smiley

So, one question: for how many in here buying BTC has been the best financial decision EVER??

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1082. Post 3520675 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: proudhon on November 08, 2013, 03:20:41 PM
Hi guys.  I've been trying to avoid the spec forum, but I decided to break down and jump back in to say "hi".  I'm pretty optimistic about bitcoin, but this move is surprising.

Wow. This is a bearish signal indeed.

Guys: SELL SELL SELL!!!





P.D.: Just joking Proudhon, very happy to have you here!!



1083. Post 3520736 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

I have to admit I'm a bit worried of having gone parabolic so quick. As we all know parabolic growth is completely unsustainable mid term and preceeds panic sells and deep crashes (the wild euphoria turns into panic very quickly), so I would have been more comfortable with a few months of linear growth before the 3rd mania phase w/ exponential growth.

If this trend continues without stopping to consolidate and return to a sustainable path we would be reaching five figures in just a month, honestly I don't think that will happen, is more likely that huge correction/pop happens before that unless there is a consolidation phase.



1084. Post 3520775 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 08, 2013, 03:24:59 PM
Well, I guess we can look forward to single digits next year now.

You never know with BTC. If the Bitcoin ETF is approved by the SEC, five digits before single digits for sure. On the contrary, if the parabolic growth continues for as little as a few days/weeks, I wouldn't be suprised to go below $50 this year. For me its clear that the more it goes up SO quickly, the deeper it will correct. Is basic psychology, people feels a huge and irrational rush when see their money doubling every few days, and that irrational excitment is easily reverted into panic - you know how we use to say, "the higher you fly the deeper you go"... In this case is very true especially in the case in which the heights are reached too quickly.



1085. Post 3520820 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 08, 2013, 03:30:35 PM
I have to admit I'm a bit worried of having gone parabolic so quick. As we all know parabolic growth is completely unsustainable mid term and preceeds panic sells and deep crashes (the wild euphoria turns into panic very quickly), so I would have been more comfortable with a few months of linear growth before the 3rd mania phase w/ exponential growth.

If this trend continues with stopping to consolidate and return to a sustainable path we would reaching five figures in just a month, honestly I don't think that will happen, is more likely that huge correction/pop happens before that unless there is a consolidation phase.
On the weekly chart we are just now starting to see the kind of growth that characterized mid to late March. (33% now vs 35%-46% then)

If things play out the same way now that they did then, we've got about 3 weeks left before some major exchange melts down and causes a panic.

Given the very short timeframes in which BTC evolves, for that kind of analysis I prefer the daily charts. And looking at the daily charts we really entered the parabolic growth phase suddenly and quickly, it smells fishy to me. At this pace we will double the current price Tuesday/Wednesday next week, and if that happens for me is a clear sign that panic is around the corner, and I will sell a modest chunk to secure some profits.

I for one hope this won't happen and price won't double for at least one month, volatility is nice but also not seeing your wealth changing 400% (for good and bad) in a few weeks Cheesy



1086. Post 3520840 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 08, 2013, 03:34:07 PM
We can talk about that once we actually top out. So far, we haven't even doubled from the 266 high.

This. It all depends on how quick we go. If we double $350 in just a few days, I will search for cover and secure some profits for sure. If it takes another month or more, I will sit comfortably and enjoy the ride, I think I will secure some profits at $1300 or so Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

/whishful thinking off



1087. Post 3520929 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: maz on November 08, 2013, 03:41:35 PM
So, one question: for how many in here buying BTC has been the best financial decision EVER??

My wife bought when the price was Ł7.80. She spent Ł5k and bought 641 coins, worth about Ł130k or so now.
This was probably the 2nd best decision she ever made (after answering "I do")

I have bought a small number of coins from time to time, but my 2nd best decision ever was to buy a bunch of 5870s back in January 2001.

Hat's off to the missus for having the balls to dump 5k back when it was Ł7. She was either a big believer or a big gambler Tongue

I guess that most BTC freaks like us are a little bit of both.

And this gamble fueled by faith is paying off so far, IMO investing what you can afford to lose into BTC is a no-brainer, historically has always been a huge win.



1088. Post 3521254 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: Voktar on November 08, 2013, 03:57:31 PM
I was kidding, it was a nod to proudhon.

I'm of the opinion that next bear market will be the most devastating and the longest one so far (worse than 2011) because everyone is caught up in the belief that if only they hold long enough, they cannot possibly lose out on BTC, no matter their entry price. Every dip is a buying opportunity etc.

Furthermore, the current bubble developed very quickly after only 7 months between former alltime high. So, it's a bubble on top of a bubble in the same year.

We can talk about that once we actually top out. So far, we haven't even doubled from the 266 high.

I'm of the opinion that the time elapsed between each bubble will be shorter and shorter, each will be more 'violent' and price will go up/down more drastically until we reach the 'climax' or real price discovery. Then after that more bubbles will come, but the price will increase less and less each time, and time will be longer.

We are far away for the 'climax', i think at least two more bubbles are needed.

Just my 2shatoshis  Smiley

The truth is that bubble 1 was more violent than bubble 2, (we went up x16, from 2 to 32), so I'd expect bubble 3 to be less violent than bubble 2 and 1.

Regarding singularity, is a beautiful *theoric* concept, but its painfully clear to me that nor the protocol nor the infrastructure can scale to accomodate such a "singularity", and thus I consider it pretty much of a fairy tale.

Anyhow, I will be obviously happy if it happens Cheesy



1089. Post 3521387 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: thezerg on November 08, 2013, 04:22:30 PM
I was kidding, it was a nod to proudhon.

I'm of the opinion that next bear market will be the most devastating and the longest one so far (worse than 2011) because everyone is caught up in the belief that if only they hold long enough, they cannot possibly lose out on BTC, no matter their entry price. Every dip is a buying opportunity etc.

Furthermore, the current bubble developed very quickly after only 7 months between former alltime high. So, it's a bubble on top of a bubble in the same year.

We can talk about that once we actually top out. So far, we haven't even doubled from the 266 high.

I'm of the opinion that the time elapsed between each bubble will be shorter and shorter, each will be more 'violent' and price will go up/down more drastically until we reach the 'climax' or real price discovery. Then after that more bubbles will come, but the price will increase less and less each time, and time will be longer.

We are far away for the 'climax', i think at least two more bubbles are needed.

Just my 2shatoshis  Smiley

The truth is that bubble 1 was more violent than bubble 2, (we went up x16, from 2 to 32), so I'd expect bubble 3 to be less violent than bubble 2 and 1.

Regarding singularity, is a beautiful *theoric* concept, but its painfully clear to me that nor the protocol nor the infrastructure can scale to accomodate such a "singularity", and thus I consider it pretty much of a fairy tale.

Anyhow, I will be obviously happy if it happens Cheesy

Really, I feel like we went from 5 to 266 in bubble #2.  5 was a long period of stability... in April 202 so that actually x50.  The only real pullback between then and the top was the pirate disaster, and that is easily seen as artificial.  That is, its a external event that could have been triggered anytime -- not really related to the trend.


Good point, I felt like we went from $20 to $266, but you might be right. We will see very soon anyhow, it's clear for me that we are entering in mode "bubble #3", ATH is broken and we are currently growing exponentially, let's see how long it lasts and how far we go in this one.



1090. Post 3522186 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

The amount of coins on sale on the exchange is shrinking fast. Only 6k on sale on BTCChina, 7k on Bitstamp, 11k on Gox.

This is the "all time low" in terms of BTC on sale. Just think about how Avalon holds 65k coins in one address.

In my opinion is not a very good sign, it would be better for the trend to be fueled by new money in instead of scarcity of supply - just because the scarcity can be easily reversed by only one big holder.

I guess this is the nature of "penny stock market", and BTC behaves completely as a penny stock market.

Tighten your seat belts.



1091. Post 3522328 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Not a hint of fear until $280ish...

Oh wait, just 24 hours ago BTC was trade at $280 on Gox Cheesy



1092. Post 3522463 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on November 08, 2013, 06:08:12 PM
For a non-pro trader, it's really incredibly hard to discern the best course of action at the moment. Sell or hold, sell or hold. It's so crazy high it doesn't make sense. But it was so crazy high it didn't make sense 24 hours ago too, and now look where we are. The incredulity of it all makes $500 or $100 on monday seem entirely possible.


I think its going up too quickly, but I do not even consider selling before we double up again (I mean around $700). We entered parabolic? So we will probably keep going parabolic at least for a few days. Anyhow: the faster we go up, the sooner we will go down - as usual Wink



1093. Post 3522565 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: chriswilmer on November 08, 2013, 06:15:40 PM
For a non-pro trader, it's really incredibly hard to discern the best course of action at the moment. Sell or hold, sell or hold. It's so crazy high it doesn't make sense. But it was so crazy high it didn't make sense 24 hours ago too, and now look where we are. The incredulity of it all makes $500 or $100 on monday seem entirely possible.


I'm pretty sure the people who are the richest in the Bitcoin world are the ones who just held.

I second that. I've made quite a few BTC by trading during the bear market after the obvious bubble pop, but that's just an "impasse" in my usual strategy (buy & hold). There's a clear chance of increasing your stash when a bubble pops, that happened in 2011 and happened this year too. But 99% of the time buy&hold is a winner, and the only purpose of trading in my book is to increase one's BTC stash.

Additionally, most of the times I spent BTC I fucked up. I sold a few hundreds coins to buy ASIC miners, and I made back only 50% of them so far - with the increasing BTC/USD exchange rate noobs will keep throwing fiat to ASIC miners like there is no tomorrow, driving the difficulty crazy high just because they do not realize that 90% of the times is better to buy BTC directly. This has been historically true, like its historically true that the ones who first bought and never sold are doing better than anybody else.

One of the few investments in BTC that were good to me were LTC (bought at 0.002 and sold at 0.012) and MSC (bought from Exodus address, not realized profit but x10 so far), most of the others I screwed up (my "cRipple" investment lost 75% of its BTC value).

On the contrary, buying BTC has always been a GOOD decision. This is historically true. Nobody lost money by buy&hold so far. This is a hard cold fact. Personally, I've bought most between $10 and $20, but I also bought at $130ish - and it has always been a good choice. BTC never fails on you Wink



1094. Post 3522753 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: gandhibt on November 08, 2013, 06:37:04 PM
On the weekly chart we are just now starting to see the kind of growth that characterized mid to late March. (33% now vs 35%-46% then)

If things play out the same way now that they did then, we've got about 3 weeks left before some major exchange melts down and causes a panic.
In March, we went +55% in 4 days from 47$ to 73$ :
http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg60zczsg2013-03-18zeg2013-03-21ztgSzm1g10zm2g25zvzp

In the last 4 days, we went +59% from 169€ to 269€.

Wow, you may be right, maybe this bubble WON'T pop! (right now) I should have checked previous bitcoin increases more thoroughly...

Well, I guess in that case I'll just diversify into gold and silver with those "useless" € I just got trying to sell at the top...

Why is it so hard to buy back in with a loss?

Because its very hard to see that you fucked up and that you have less BTC than you had on beforehand. For me that's the worst feeling Smiley



1095. Post 3522809 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.21h):

Quote from: Its About Sharing on November 08, 2013, 06:44:41 PM
On the weekly chart we are just now starting to see the kind of growth that characterized mid to late March. (33% now vs 35%-46% then)

If things play out the same way now that they did then, we've got about 3 weeks left before some major exchange melts down and causes a panic.
In March, we went +55% in 4 days from 47$ to 73$ :
http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg60zczsg2013-03-18zeg2013-03-21ztgSzm1g10zm2g25zvzp

In the last 4 days, we went +59% from 169€ to 269€.

Wow, you may be right, maybe this bubble WON'T pop! (right now) I should have checked previous bitcoin increases more thoroughly...

Well, I guess in that case I'll just diversify into gold and silver with those "useless" € I just got trying to sell at the top...

Add to my math, but keeping it simple. If we do 266(top)/73 = 3.64
Then we can say X/269=3.64...   X= $980
Is that our top?  Grin

I have to say that's the top I have in my mind. My initial plan is to realize some profits at $700, and some more at $970. I mean... x30 profit on average is good enough to cash in some fiat for me. But I will keep most of my BTC stash for the long run Smiley



1096. Post 3538356 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: strawbs on November 10, 2013, 09:59:05 AM
Looks like Europe will be waking up just a little bit to late to actually profit from this short opportunity.
As various others have said here, holding seems to have been the most profitable action anyone could have taken throughout the last six months four years

Fixed for you.



1097. Post 3538600 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Well, the good old weekend dip is back. I almost forgot that 95% of my BTC were bought on "weekend dips" Cheesy



1098. Post 3538785 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: Miz4r on November 10, 2013, 11:36:29 AM
Well, the good old weekend dip is back. I almost forgot that 95% of my BTC were bought on "weekend dips" Cheesy

Me too! Should have sold a couple hundred yesterday at $380, would have woken up VERY happy this morning.

I suspect though tomorrow will be crazy- with all the Fiat coming in people are going to be super excited to have a chance to buy in cheaper.

Meanwhile fiat on Bitstamp is growing every single minute, $6.5M now and counting. Just waiting for the bomb to go off. Wink

Right. And weekend dips are a GOOD thing. The faster it goes up without a correction, the quicker the mania will become panic. In the short term price discovery cannot be = to sustained parabolic growth.

Making a long story short: the more dips and corrections we have on the way, the more likely we will go through $1,000 like a hot knife through butter and we won't ever be looking back Wink



1099. Post 3538824 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.22h):

Quote from: w00dy on November 10, 2013, 11:44:51 AM
Meanwhile fiat on Bitstamp is growing every single minute, $6.5M now and counting. Just waiting for the bomb to go off. Wink


and you know what's on Stamp because of...what?

order book?

lol...

Fiat on stamp's order book is growing by the minute, that's a fact and while we all know that the total amount of fiat on an exchange is higher than the fiat on its order book, the latter is the only parameter we have to "guessestimate" the "fiat on Stamp" or the "fiat on any other exchange".



1100. Post 3618092 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Choo choo motheruckers




1101. Post 3621537 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

I'm on my mobile, how big was the dump in terms of BTC volume?



1102. Post 3621645 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 18, 2013, 09:36:58 AM
Well, I guess I'm not very good at this. I bought back in maybe two hours after starting to sell...

Just can't part with my bitcoins.  Wink

I dont need the money ive invest in BTC, my plan is to keep it some years. The question is if the price crash and drops 50% i would win the double selling and buying at smaller price. I would have 2x BTC when the price rises again..

Tell me when you have it. Dreamer. There is no one in the whole forum who has succeeded in that, however easy it sounds.

I started online trading 15 years ago and have twice in my life been able to increase the number of BTC by more than 2%. Even that beats the average.

For the record, I made about 0.5%... do not recommend.

Risto is right. I believe that the only moment in which is kind of trivial to increase ones BTC stash is bear market, but nevertheless is trickier than it seems. My experience is that I managed to increase my stash by almost 50% from April 10th to June, then I blew almost all that profit by making lousy investments (cRipple and ASiC that will never have a positive BTC ROI).

Buy on the dips, hold and just sell 10% when you already made a x100 unrealized profit. Forget about risk management, only sound strategy with BTC is "invest everything you can afford to lose". By constantly day trading you will end up with less coins, guaranteed.



1103. Post 3621833 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: BitThink on November 18, 2013, 10:03:06 AM
Just half an hour ago, the whole ask orders are around 1000 BTC in BTCChina, but now there're 1600BTC up to 3990 CNY now. It seems a quick small correction attracts quit a lot sellers.

Just wait to see what happens when 60k coins are rapidly dumped as it happened on April, 10th.



1104. Post 3621852 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.24h):

Quote from: Searing on November 18, 2013, 09:56:57 AM
Im scared lol

been at this 1 month mining 21 coins....hmmm......may have to take any coin I get put in paper wallet USB and place far away in
safe deposit box in a bank......if I plan to just hoard.....this is like trying to take a break from women at the playboy mansion....restraint man
restraint.....

crap its only been 1 month of this for me no wonder everyone on here is insane



damn 21 coins... here I am sitting with 1 coin lol


got a KNC Jupiter I expected to make ROI in a lesiurey fashion in say 9 months to 1 year...as I expected hype to slow down etc more equip etc.....mad ROI in 25 days
started mining oct 18th I think coin then was around $150

to say I'm noob and confused is an understatement

ah hell its only money (or not depending on what the u.s. house says on Monday about all this)


Very confused indeed. Your ROI is negative because you bought a BTC minting machine, and you would have bought more coins with your fiat that coins your machine will ever mint.



1105. Post 3630033 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

It was funny watching ATH broken after Carpenter's closing speech after the prosecutors/regulators turn Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1106. Post 3630668 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

So... How long until Satoshi is the richest man on hearth?

Cheesy

...not a bad time to sell a little tough Wink



1107. Post 3630792 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Bitstamp catching up




1108. Post 3630809 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 18, 2013, 11:17:35 PM
Is there no one left to predict an impending crash to single digits any more?

I guess we reached the tipping point, no single digits ever again unless BTC is going straight to 0.



1109. Post 3631019 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Beware of the euphoria, guys.



1110. Post 3631136 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 18, 2013, 11:42:25 PM
Beware of the euphoria, guys.

I'm feeling it... this is better than any drug.

How much have you made this month?
This month?  How much have you made TODAY?  
I just whipped out the calculator and spontaneously did a happy dance  Grin.  
I know euphoria is usually prelude to a hangover feeling, but this feels awesome  Grin .

Paper profits. View them as such. If it drops to $100 tomorrow (without valid reason) I won't care.

This. Just make sure to realize at least a bit of those profits at some point Cheesy



1111. Post 3637246 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: ag@th0s on November 19, 2013, 11:22:14 AM
Lol - just opened up a browser that I haven't used for a couple days which had it's Bitcoinity tabs frozen in time - thought "Shit - Bitstamp down to $525!!"

Don't see it happening, either.

Well, hold tight, you will probably see $525 soon enough.



1112. Post 3637258 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: maz on November 19, 2013, 11:49:11 AM
Is this how it happened last time or was it faster?

It was much faster. This looks looks like a simple correction.



1113. Post 3637324 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: ag@th0s on November 19, 2013, 11:56:30 AM
Lol - just opened up a browser that I haven't used for a couple days which had it's Bitcoinity tabs frozen in time - thought "Shit - Bitstamp down to $525!!"

Don't see it happening, either.

Well, hold tight, you will probably see $525 soon enough.


Yeah, I'm just hoping.  What do you think will happen if it goes below $532?

Nothing. Corrections need to happen. Parabolic growth is unsustainable. No real panic until below $350 (aprox.), media cycle is extremely positive and new money will flow to Bitcoin in the next weeks.



1114. Post 3637352 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on November 19, 2013, 12:00:10 PM
Lol - just opened up a browser that I haven't used for a couple days which had it's Bitcoinity tabs frozen in time - thought "Shit - Bitstamp down to $525!!"

Don't see it happening, either.

Well, hold tight, you will probably see $525 soon enough.


Yeah, I'm just hoping.  What do you think will happen if it goes below $532?


395 $.  

if we go below 390~395 > 266.

still think 600 is the floor, I am hold to that till it gets broken, opposite of a bear screaming the incoming x,xx or low 200s lol

We just visited $566 on Stamp, didn't you realize?



1115. Post 3637371 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Nice fight on stamp, would love to see a double bottom at $500



1116. Post 3637404 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: NamelessOne on November 19, 2013, 12:06:51 PM
We have a potential classic bitcoin triangle forming. Needs to climb back to and bounce down off of 775ish to really see if it forms though... But it looks like it could happen... We shall see.

What is a 'classic bitcoin triangle'?

Bitcoin has an incredible habit of forming the triangle wave pattern. It does it all the time thus it has become a bit classic for the bitcoin market to do them. At times it almost seems like certain big players are trying to design the triangles.


Pics or it didn't happen.



1117. Post 3637449 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

12k for sale on Bitstamp, aprox. double what we used to see the last days.

Bears are reloading ammo, bulls crapping their pants?



1118. Post 3638261 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Interesting moments, if we break down $350 we will see some real panic and the buying opportunity will be EXCELLENT. Difficult to say if it will happen though. $600-$700 (on Stamp) was an excellent moment to realize some fiat profits and I'm happy with the choice I made.

To all the "singularity" fans: just remember that BTC's infrastructure is not ready yet for such an event. Nevertheless, I find myself not agreeing with Blitz, this does not look to me like a "pop" preceeding a bear market, this looks to me just like a healthy correction that brings some sanity to an unsustainable parabolic growth scenario. We need to remember that Gox is broke; Bitstamp is currently delaying both deposits and withdrawals (its been +1 week since the last "fresh" money was credit to Bitstamp accounts); Coinbase halted trading, and the rest of exchanges are a joke. Fiat is having a harsh time to flow to and from the exchanges.

Taking into account all the above, I bet for the "correction" scenario.



1119. Post 3638283 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

oooops




1120. Post 3640567 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: jatajuta on November 19, 2013, 04:59:58 PM
Guys, is yesterday's hearing continuing today?

3:30 pm Eastern Time

Yep, this time the real "bad guys" will be heard (the bankers)



1121. Post 3640613 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Bid side on Bitstamp is extremely thin. On the contrary, the ask side is very healthy in the $600-$700 range.

BTW: a 10 BTC "dump" brought us down to $580 from $600 - $20 slippage for a 10 BTC sell, wow, this market is a joke Cheesy



1122. Post 3640784 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Quote from: Miz4r on November 19, 2013, 05:20:20 PM
Bid side on Bitstamp is extremely thin. On the contrary, the ask side is very healthy in the $600-$700 range.

BTW: a 10 BTC "dump" brought us down to $580 from $600 - $20 slippage for a 10 BTC sell, wow, this market is a joke Cheesy

That's because nobody can get into Bitstamp atm to trade except for a very few lucky people. Bid/ask depth is still looking the way it was a couple of hours ago when the price was just starting to recover, so no wonder bid side is looking empty and asks are looking good.

Ooopps.... A 2.3BTC buy took us to $640 on Bitstamp. What a joke Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1123. Post 3641964 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.25h):

Big volume divergence, technicals are screaming "down we go"... And hard.

On the other side, we all know BTC doesn't give a shit about technicals, at least most of the times. Placing some bids around $330/350 on Stamp seems reasonable, "just in case" Smiley



1124. Post 3643527 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Shasky is loaded, no doubt about it.



1125. Post 3643872 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

the red lady is failing hard.



1126. Post 3643897 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

jeff garzik would like to kill the red lady, just look at his face Cheesy



1127. Post 3644103 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

red lady is loaded of XRP

FAIL.



1128. Post 3644167 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

heidi is crapping her pants, she knows there's no turning back



1129. Post 3644209 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

heidi: "and let people know: you are on your own"

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1130. Post 3644276 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Gallipi shot in his foot



1131. Post 3644318 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Gallipi just tanked the price... He crapped his pants and did not answer to the last question, what a fail, Shasky and the indian lady yesterday have kicked everybody's butt Cheesy



1132. Post 3644375 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: maz on November 19, 2013, 10:14:04 PM
Gallipi just tanked the price... He crapped his pants and did not answer to the last question, what a fail, Shasky and the indian lady yesterday have kicked everybody's butt Cheesy

Much better to reply with a better answer that you have had time to reflect on, than a rushed one.

Man, he should have been prepared for that question. If you know BTC you have thought about that. You know that cash is very much harder to follow/track than BTC, you can reply that you can just apply the same rules you use for cash which is what the FinCen lady (or the indian lady that came yesterday) would have answered to that.



1133. Post 3644411 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 19, 2013, 10:13:19 PM
Gallipi just tanked the price... He crapped his pants and did not answer to the last question, what a fail, Shasky and the indian lady yesterday have kicked everybody's butt Cheesy

what was the last question? i thought he did answer it.


the essence of the question was "give me concrete examples of what we have to do to make sure that things as the Silk Road won't happen". There's no need to crap your pants on that, as the fincen lady said paper cash is a much greater tool for fraud/crime etc., just follow the same rules and move on.



1134. Post 3644436 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: gizmoh on November 19, 2013, 10:22:33 PM
Gallipi u screwed the market

Gallippi is doomed, the ghost of the big crash of November, 19th will follow him forever. He popped the bubble all by himself!!




1135. Post 3644498 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 19, 2013, 10:23:39 PM
Gallipi u screwed the market
Oh come on, he did okay.

He did OK for 95% of the talk, but he screwed up at the very end by crapping his pants with the last question. Let's be serious: this charade at the Capitol is totally irrelevant, its pure entertainment, and the finale was bad. The markets are eager to take a direction, they wait in tension till the very end to decide where to go, and if you just take a crap on their head well, that's not cool and they go down Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1136. Post 3649222 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Quote from: TERA on November 20, 2013, 08:56:34 AM
Have we officially gone now from correction to full blown bubble collapse?

Not yet, there's seem to be nice support at $400, but the recent mania was so crazy that this might be the moment in which we will revisit and test the all time exponential trend line (which now sits around $370).

For the "that will not ever happen crowd": just remind that the price is bound to be 50% of the time above the trend line, and 50% below it. It's math. Place your bids and take the buying opportunity if it happens. If not, be happy and remember to realize some fiat profits at some point, preferably when we are way above the exponential trend line (above $670 it was a no brainer to secure some fiat profits especially for those who bought at double digits).



1137. Post 3649334 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

Nice. On Gox money goes in, money doesn't go out. On Stamp, money doesn't go in, money doesn't go out. The rest of the exchanges? A bad joke.

Nice ecosystem and infrastructure we have. So much for the singularity fans Cheesy



1138. Post 3651745 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

I always knew Proudhon was a "reverse psychology" fan, he has always been loaded, and he liked to speak about how BTC was a bubble to have a guaranteed satisfaction: if it went to 0, then he was right. If it went to 5 digits, then himself and his kids and the kids of his kids are all set for life.

Now... he's rich Cheesy



1139. Post 3652340 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.26h):

I do not think that "risk management" strategies are sound for BTC. In my book the only way to go is the following:

Invest in BTC an amount you are ready to lose

Don't forget to realize some fiat profits, because unrealized profits = non-existent profits.

Practical example:

Somebody that invested in January this year has already a 50x unrealized profit. Wise thing in my book would be to sell at least 10% of the BTC, cashing in a healthy 5x profit on the initial investment, while keeping 90% of the BTC for the next cycle.

I'm using this strategy myself, with a clear exit plan I tend to follow strictly. I was lucky because I managed to reach x100 in the last run-up (BTC doubled 3 times in 4 weeks), but I would have cashed out even at x50.



1140. Post 3656969 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

$12.92M on Stamp's order book. That has to be a record high.

Plus $24.51M on Gox's. Healthy amount of bids on BTC's exchanges, that's a fact.



1141. Post 3657077 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Bitstamp had "banking software problems" and didn't credit any deposit for +1 week, they just solved it, that's why bids grew by almost 50%.



1142. Post 3661157 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Poor bears. Pockets full of fiat, feeling sad and lonely because the choo choo train is leaving them behind Cheesy

Just joking. Huge resistance at $650 on Stamp, BTC1,500 mini-wall (not so mini these days at the current exchange rate) not getting chewed.

For those who took profits in the $670-$700 range (Stamp) these were great moments. I personally managed to sell 10% of my stash at $675, re-bought at $420 and just sold again a few hours ago around $630. Let me add that it was mostly sheer luck, my intention was to just take profits and not to daytrade, but you cannot say no to such an opportunity Cheesy

Gotta love bitcoin....



1143. Post 3661556 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

resistance on $650 (stamp) is growing. +2300BTC before $650.01



1144. Post 3661560 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: prof7bit on November 21, 2013, 10:08:22 AM
Every time it's a bigger bubble, bigger losses, and more negative publicity.
Did you even bother to look at the chart before claiming such nonsense? Your so called "bubbles" are becoming smaller and smaller every time and volatility is decreasing! Look at the all-time chart to see it yourself.

This.



1145. Post 3661593 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: niothor on November 21, 2013, 09:56:36 AM
Poor bears. Pockets full of fiat, feeling sad and lonely because the choo choo train is leaving them behind Cheesy

Just joking. Huge resistance at $650 on Stamp, BTC1,500 mini-wall (not so mini these days at the current exchange rate) not getting chewed.

For those who took profits in the $670-$700 range (Stamp) these were great moments. I personally managed to sell 10% of my stash at $675, re-bought at $420 and just sold again a few hours ago around $630. Let me add that it was mostly sheer luck, my intention was to just take profits and not to daytrade, but you cannot say no to such an opportunity Cheesy

Gotta love bitcoin....

So what happened  to bitcoin must crash to 50-40 in order to fly to the sky? Cheesy

It crashed to $50 on April 10th, tough Cheesy

Let me add that:

- being a bear is very satisfying*. If you are right, you are right; if you are wrong, you are rich Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
- I only daytrade during bear markets. I don't see how I can increase my BTC in a bull market, and increasing my BTC is the only purpose of daytrading for me.

*I assume that bear or bull, nobody sane is 100% fiat, ever. The chances of the choo choo train leaving you behind are too high. This is why even the super-bears as Blitz do not short BTC Cheesy



1146. Post 3661659 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: gandhibt on November 21, 2013, 10:19:19 AM
Poor bears. Pockets full of fiat, feeling sad and lonely because the choo choo train is leaving them behind Cheesy

Just joking. Huge resistance at $650 on Stamp, BTC1,500 mini-wall (not so mini these days at the current exchange rate) not getting chewed.

For those who took profits in the $670-$700 range (Stamp) these were great moments. I personally managed to sell 10% of my stash at $675, re-bought at $420 and just sold again a few hours ago around $630. Let me add that it was mostly sheer luck, my intention was to just take profits and not to daytrade, but you cannot say no to such an opportunity Cheesy

Gotta love bitcoin....

So what happened  to bitcoin must crash to 50-40 in order to fly to the sky? Cheesy

It crashed to $50 on April 10th, tough Cheesy

Let me add that:

- being a bear is very satisfying*. If you are right, you are right; if you are wrong, you are rich Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
- I only daytrade during bear markets. I don't see how I can increase my BTC in a bull market, and increasing my BTC is the only purpose of daytrading for me.

*I assume that bear or bull, nobody sane is 100% fiat, ever. The chances of the choo choo train leaving you behind are too high. This is why even the super-bears as Blitz do not short BTC Cheesy


Is it shorting only when you are all out of coins, but when you sell 50% of your coins it isn't? I'm just curious because people use this word differently.

Shorting = borrowing coins to sell them, in the hopes that the price per coin will be lower when you have to give them back. A "short sell" is to sell an asset (BTC) you don't own, you just have borrowed it to sell it because you anticipate the price to go down.

That's extremely dangerous with BTC, because the price has the potential to double multiple times very quickly, and thus you can face huge losses by shorting.

That's what "shorting" means, but in these forums many people say they are "short" when they have sold coins, which is not correct. What can you expect in a forum where most of people thinks that ROI is a synonym for break-even....



1147. Post 3662162 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 21, 2013, 11:38:13 AM
Shorting = borrowing coins to sell them, in the hopes that the price per coin will be lower when you have to give them back. A "short sell" is to sell an asset (BTC) you don't own, you just have borrowed it to sell it because you anticipate the price to go down.

That's extremely dangerous with BTC, because the price has the potential to double multiple times very quickly, and thus you can face huge losses by shorting.

That's what "shorting" means, but in these forums many people say they are "short" when they have sold coins, which is not correct. What can you expect in a forum where most of people thinks that ROI is a synonym for break-even....

"Shorting" is that you own any asset that you don't need, but you decide to not sell it and purchase bitcoins instead.

Shorting USD?? Cheesy



1148. Post 3663095 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Risto: did you buy back at a loss?

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin



1149. Post 3663428 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):



Poor bears, pockets full of fiat, feeling sad and lonely because the choo choo train left them behind...

Risto: did you buy back yet?

Cheesy



1150. Post 3663479 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: nesevis on November 21, 2013, 02:22:21 PM
I'm just so happy I didn't listen you guys yesterday Smiley

"Don't sell the bear skin before killing it"

Cheesy



1151. Post 3663526 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on November 21, 2013, 02:26:45 PM
I'm all in again. I just agreed to purchase a roll of Casascius Coins from my friend as soon as they arrive. Grabbed a few electronic ones as well. So Bulls please feel free to go crazy!

All in again? What about your ramblings about the bubble popping, bad publicity for Bitcoin and BLAH BLAH BLAH.

You are weak if you thought this was a bubble pop at $550 and now you bought back at a los at $695. Bubble pop or correction is not confirmed yet, I don't see why you changed your "analysis" in such a way in just 24h. Maybe you are just being overemotional?



1152. Post 3666304 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: derpinheimer on November 21, 2013, 06:18:28 PM

This explains some odd behavior but it's not a big deal.

Are you joking? If this is half true it is a fuckup of epic proportions.



1153. Post 3666331 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Richy_T on November 21, 2013, 06:57:47 PM
This is a monstrous fuckup of enormous proportions, if this is true then their trading engine is broken beyond repair and should be taken down and replaced by something else immediately!

Right, out of order execution is not acceptable.

I dunno. It just depends on the matching algorithm. It may not be industry best practices but I don't see that it necessarily shouldn't be acceptable in and of itself.

Read again. If what it's written it's true, then their trading engine is exploitable - an exploitable trading engine is NOT acceptable, it's a SCAM




1154. Post 3666772 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on November 21, 2013, 07:34:46 PM
I can't believe I sold all just under 500! I was so happy to have over a half million $ that I couldn't wait. Oh well, I guess all I can do is sit in my new completely paid off house and cry. lol

You sold all? Really?

IMO at current BTC valutation selling "for good" (to cash in fiat profits) more than 35% of ones BTC stash is completely crazy, regardless of when you bought in.

If you bought in low double digits/single digits, then your profits are SO HUGE that selling only 20% will grant you a massive gain, while you still keep bullets for the "next round".

If you bought just a few weeks/months ago, then selling 20% is probably enough to recover your full investment, while you keep riding the BTC train.

In any case, selling all seems like something you will bitterly regret in the near future. I guess you dig in the forums and read the stories of those who sold tens of k's of coins in 2011 (if not hundreds of thousands of coins), bought a nice house and a nice car and retired from the BTC scene for good. Just 2 years after those guys would be so wealthy that their kids and the kids of their kids would be all set for life.

Yep - it might not happen. But its the kind of opportunity you just cannot afford to lose Wink



1155. Post 3666790 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Malevolent is right. Never go full fiat. That's been historically a losing strategy, and that's a matter of fact - unless you sold to buy back lower and you succeeded, obviously.



1156. Post 3666827 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Spaceman_Spiff on November 21, 2013, 07:47:48 PM
Malevolent is right. Never go full fiat. That's been historically a losing strategy, and that's a matter of fact - unless you sold to buy back lower and you succeeded, obviously.
The dude made half a million bucks.  I would be happy....

Let me tell you something: half a million buck won't solve your life for good (maybe yes - but I know that it won't solve MANY people lives); 5 million bucks will solve your life for good.

My motto is that you can afford to lose a shitload of money that won't solve your life; what you cannot afford to lose is the opportunity to be "all set".



1157. Post 3666918 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on November 21, 2013, 07:48:24 PM
I can't believe I sold all just under 500! I was so happy to have over a half million $ that I couldn't wait. Oh well, I guess all I can do is sit in my new completely paid off house and cry. lol

You sold all? Really?

IMO at current BTC valutation selling "for good" (to cash in fiat profits) more than 35% of ones BTC stash is completely crazy, regardless of when you bought in.

If you bought in low double digits/single digits, then your profits are SO HUGE that selling only 20% will grant you a massive gain, while you still keep bullets for the "next round".

If you bought just a few weeks/months ago, then selling 20% is probably enough to recover your full investment, while you keep riding the BTC trading.

In any case, selling all seems like something you will bitterly regret in the near future. I guess you dig in the forums and read the stories of those who sold tens of k's of coins in 2011 (if not hundreds of thousands of coins), bought a nice house and a nice car and retired from the BTC scene for good. Just 2 years after those guys would be so wealthy that their kids and the kids of their kids would be all set for life.

Yep - it might not happen. But its the kind of opportunity you just cannot afford to lose Wink

I already kind of regret it but I mined for most of my coin so long ago and this is such a giant windfall that it's hard to not be happy.

Well, I kinda admire you. I've learnt so much from the stories of Sirius and other early adopters who said "OK" and "resigned" themselves by cashing out $500k - $1.5M in 2011 and lost the opportunity to have now x40 of that amount just two years later, that I could NEVER think of going full fiat unless I'd be in a super serious need. (Sirius is not the only example, the other guy from the "hackers club" who was believed to be Satoshi cashed out +77k coins too in 2011)

In fact, I think that I will probably end up holding BTC when it finally implodes... "Never go full fiat" really sticked into my head.

Let me add that I'm not against taking profits: I've already cashed in for good aprox. ten-fold of what I originally invested in BTC, and I have an "exit plan" that comprends different sells at different price levels (first big step was a few days ago at $675 - but I still hold the vast majority of my BTC). Its just that my plan does not contemplate "full fiat" unless I reach the point in which money will never be an issue anymore for me or my kids.



1158. Post 3666997 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on November 21, 2013, 08:00:24 PM
You're all right to hold on to some for the future, and I kept a couple just in case, but it does feel really good to have made money and cashed out. For many of the dream chasers here cashing out is a bedtime fantasy. I don't want to dream about it anymore. At what point do you cash out? At retirement or when you have a big purchase and need the money? Never? I hope the price goes to a million a coin and we are all rich off a few coins but I most likely won't live long enough to see that happen.

I haven't spent a coin since Jeremy was selling Amazon cards to Americans. So I've been saving for a long time. Time to spend!

I understand you, I guess it also depends on your circumstances. But I have to admit it strikes me just because I wouldn't do what you did (and in fact I'm not doing that, but cashing out very slowly and progressively). I mean, 20% of what you cashed out is already $100k, which is a reasonable amount. Let's say that $100k buys you 1 year of comfortable life while you still ride this choo choo train with 80% of your holdings. Its so clear for me that's the only way to go with BTC, to hold with as many coins as possible to see if it realizes its potential and the long-term trend continues, that it strikes me to hear stories like yours. But again: I guess its a matter of circumstances too. Congrats and enjoy Wink



1159. Post 3667009 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: mb300sd on November 21, 2013, 08:06:52 PM
My cash out point is when 50% lets me retire at 25 and live very comfortably for the rest of my life. Then I'll only cash out 50%.

See? That's a strategy I can understand better Wink

(I guess we are a bit of a gamblers)



1160. Post 3667075 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on November 21, 2013, 08:10:44 PM
You're all right to hold on to some for the future, and I kept a couple just in case, but it does feel really good to have made money and cashed out. For many of the dream chasers here cashing out is a bedtime fantasy. I don't want to dream about it anymore. At what point do you cash out? At retirement or when you have a big purchase and need the money? Never? I hope the price goes to a million a coin and we are all rich off a few coins but I most likely won't live long enough to see that happen.

I haven't spent a coin since Jeremy was selling Amazon cards to Americans. So I've been saving for a long time. Time to spend!

I understand you, I guess it also depends on your circumstances. But I have to admit it strikes me just because I wouldn't do what you did (and in fact I'm not doing that, but cashing out very slowly and progressively). I mean, 20% of what you cashed out is already $100k, which is a reasonable amount. Let's say that $100k buys you 1 year of comfortable life while you still ride this choo choo train with 80% of your holdings. Its so clear for me that's the only way to go with BTC, to hold with as many coins as possible to see if it realizes its potential and the long-term trend continues, that it strikes me to hear stories like yours. But again: I guess its a matter of circumstances too. Congrats and enjoy Wink

You're probably not as old as I am either. lol

Exactly. That is what I meant by "circumstances". I know $500k won't change my life in the long term, but I can understand that situation and circumstances might be very different. I mean... Those of us who entered this game at least one year ago had the feeling this thing could have gone at least x100. And it did. We all agree it can go to 5 digits super easily, and 6 digits is a real possibility if this BTC thing really takes off. Even 7 digits is not mathematically impossible, albeit unlikely.

So... We got it right at least till here and it strikes me you leave our choo choo train just now. We'll miss you Wink



1161. Post 3667237 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 21, 2013, 08:20:09 PM
Mortgage the house and buy some back.  Or get a second loan and buy some back.  You will eventually be able to pay of the second loan and still have some coins in case (which there is a decent chance) we get to $100,000 and beyond.
Only on bitcointalk can you find this sort of advice. My goodness.

Debt is so deeply rooted in US folks mentality that it hurts. I really have a simpathy for Bitchick, I'm a long-term bull myself, but came on... To advise someone to get in debt (even worse, to mortgage his house) to buy a high-risk experimental currency is so fucked up it blows my mind. We where speaking about "opportunities you cannot afford to lose"... Well, being in debt or losing your house to gamble is something NOBODY should afford to do.

And that type of mentality leads me to think that eventually BTC will implode sooner than later, people tends to auto-destruction and greed is one of the main mind-fuckers.




1162. Post 3667292 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 21, 2013, 08:35:39 PM
You're all right to hold on to some for the future, and I kept a couple just in case, but it does feel really good to have made money and cashed out. For many of the dream chasers here cashing out is a bedtime fantasy. I don't want to dream about it anymore. At what point do you cash out? At retirement or when you have a big purchase and need the money? Never? I hope the price goes to a million a coin and we are all rich off a few coins but I most likely won't live long enough to see that happen.

I haven't spent a coin since Jeremy was selling Amazon cards to Americans. So I've been saving for a long time. Time to spend!

How many coins did you cash out in total?

Just over 1800.

Edit: that's all I've ever had which includes spending at SpendBitcoins.

How are you planning to withdraw it from Gox though? Gonna take the 5% extortion fee?

That can't be helped. I may as we'll tell you, it's almost over now. I have several family members receiving from accounts I helped them make. They will receive the funds and transfer to me slowly. The extortion fee isn't as bad as the tax will be.

Why make several accounts when you can withdraw from one account? It's a procentual fee.

Because of tax. He made it clear.



1163. Post 3667350 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Odalv on November 21, 2013, 08:38:42 PM
You're all right to hold on to some for the future, and I kept a couple just in case, but it does feel really good to have made money and cashed out. For many of the dream chasers here cashing out is a bedtime fantasy. I don't want to dream about it anymore. At what point do you cash out? At retirement or when you have a big purchase and need the money? Never? I hope the price goes to a million a coin and we are all rich off a few coins but I most likely won't live long enough to see that happen.

I haven't spent a coin since Jeremy was selling Amazon cards to Americans. So I've been saving for a long time. Time to spend!

How many coins did you cash out in total?

Just over 1800.

Edit: that's all I've ever had which includes spending at SpendBitcoins.

How are you planning to withdraw it from Gox though? Gonna take the 5% extortion fee?

That can't be helped. I may as well tell you, it's almost over now. I have several family members receiving from accounts I helped them make. They will receive the funds and transfer to me slowly. The extortion fee isn't as bad as the tax will be.

There is limit $10k USD/ month at gox. -> $500k is 50 man-months :-)  (if any)

With apostilled documents you can do $100k per day and $500k per months. I guess most of the people with +1,000 coins already sent apostilled documents, and I'd suggest to those holding as much as a few hundred coins to get the higher levels of trust in their exchanges, "you never know when you might need it" Wink



1164. Post 3667363 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Troll Toll on November 21, 2013, 08:41:43 PM
rampion,

you abhor debt, but at the same time are dumbfounded why he would sell off his bitcoins so that he can get out of debt.

I sold hundreds of bitcoins back in march/april to eliminate myself of debt, and i regret NOTHING.

I see, its just that it takes a while to me to understand because i've NEVER been in debt in my life. NEVER.



1165. Post 3667510 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: uvwvj on November 21, 2013, 08:48:24 PM
rampion,

you abhor debt, but at the same time are dumbfounded why he would sell off his bitcoins so that he can get out of debt.

I sold hundreds of bitcoins back in march/april to eliminate myself of debt, and i regret NOTHING.

I see, its just that it takes a while to me to understand because i've NEVER been in debt in my life. NEVER.

Debt is not bad as long as it it good debt,

Examples of good debt -
homes that you have equity in (tax right offs)
student loans if you have to have them (dont go to extreme, study your major, job opputunities and wages after graduation) - Also dont pay these off first, pay all other things off, incase you die no others have to pay for (unlike a mortage)
12 months same as cash - Do this all the time with furniture, tvs and such pay it off in 10 months so its not on a credit card and your cash is not upfront

Bad debt
Large car loans, no need to drive a $30k new car when a $3k dollar nice one works
Credit Card, - Yes everyone needs a credit card to pay for things but find a good rate, and pay it off within 6 months


Might be, not mi cup of tea. I guess that when you are used to debt you just do not feel any stress by owing money recurrently and consistently, month after month. I prefer to abhor it as a matter of principle.



1166. Post 3667567 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: ag@th0s on November 21, 2013, 08:54:29 PM
rampion,

you abhor debt, but at the same time are dumbfounded why he would sell off his bitcoins so that he can get out of debt.

I sold hundreds of bitcoins back in march/april to eliminate myself of debt, and i regret NOTHING.

I see, its just that it takes a while to me to understand because i've NEVER been in debt in my life. NEVER.

In debt or held a debt? Don't they have credit cards in Transylvania?

Yes they have, but I never use them for my personal expenses, I use debit cards. Why I shouldnt use the money I already have, instead of the one that I *might* have in the future? Good to have them in case there is an emergency, but why using them systematically and recurrently? Its plain retarded in my book.



1167. Post 3667622 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on November 21, 2013, 09:00:26 PM
You're all right to hold on to some for the future, and I kept a couple just in case, but it does feel really good to have made money and cashed out. For many of the dream chasers here cashing out is a bedtime fantasy. I don't want to dream about it anymore. At what point do you cash out? At retirement or when you have a big purchase and need the money? Never? I hope the price goes to a million a coin and we are all rich off a few coins but I most likely won't live long enough to see that happen.

I haven't spent a coin since Jeremy was selling Amazon cards to Americans. So I've been saving for a long time. Time to spend!

How many coins did you cash out in total?

Just over 1800.

Edit: that's all I've ever had which includes spending at SpendBitcoins.

How are you planning to withdraw it from Gox though? Gonna take the 5% extortion fee?

That can't be helped. I may as well tell you, it's almost over now. I have several family members receiving from accounts I helped them make. They will receive the funds and transfer to me slowly. The extortion fee isn't as bad as the tax will be.

There is limit $10k USD/ month at gox. -> $500k is 50 man-months :-)  (if any)

That's right. That's why you need family or really, really close friends.

Really? Did they changed that recently? When I traded on Gox trusted status (apostilled docs) got you $100k daily for a max. of $500k monthly.



1168. Post 3668592 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

$750 (Stamp) getting closer. It could be a nice battle, bears seem to have more ammo in the frontlines Smiley



1169. Post 3669093 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 21, 2013, 11:37:29 PM
...as soon as everyone realizes everyone else is just here to make profits.

I think pretty much everybody already realized that.



1170. Post 3669129 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: TERA on November 21, 2013, 11:41:38 PM
Wtf is going on here. The chart looks unnatural like nothing ive ever seen even in bitcoin. When do I sell? I sold just 20% of my coins yesterday as a hedge and on bitfinex I can I have a loss of several grand. Its bugging me out.

I thought you the unassailable king of the day traders who never made a loss?

Schadenfreude and tea for breakfast...sorry Smiley
I almost never make a loss in FIAT but this is a loss of coins. In bitfinex I'm "shorting" against my own coins so I get to see the amount of fiat value that the "trade" is losing versus if I had just held. However, my total account balance is increasing faster than the "loss". I should have just transferred to my exchange wallet and did a normal sell so it wouldn't be so painful.

Making a profit in FIAT is trivial and obvious when trading an asset that constantly grows as BTC, just look at the all time graph. If you are losing coins then your doing bad - very bad. You'd be better by holding.



1171. Post 3669288 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: MoreFun on November 21, 2013, 11:57:59 PM
Any particular reason why the bitcoin price would surge due to merchant adoption? Let's all be honest with each other, bitcoin is still hard as fuck to use for the average person when buying something. Couple that with the volatility and there's just no incentive for anyone to use bitcoin over dollars.

All it would achieve is bring in more speculators who want in on the craze because they think they might make some profit. Yes that might surge the price temporarily, but it would drop just as fast as soon as everyone realizes everyone else is just here to make profits.

Are you frozenlock or why you have his image?

He is definitely not Frozenlock.   I have no idea why he stole his image, or why we have not heard from Frozen for quite a while.   I would speculate Frozen never bought back in after the April correction, since he said he was not holding through the fall again, and was expecting prices to fall much further than they did.   This guy who stole his avatar said in a post he only got into BTC this year.

He is not, much different type of thinking and writing yea. I think he bought back, at least he said he ended daytrading cause this fucked him up.

Nice stories, but either he told you them privately or you are making them up: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=13296;sa=showPosts

Smiley



1172. Post 3669365 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: TERA on November 22, 2013, 12:03:21 AM
I heard there was a 96% drop in 2011 also, and those who bought anywhere near the high didnt see their money for two years. You cant deny that bitcoin is a high risk investment. Anything can happen So in a worst case scenario I want my funds to at least maintain the same order of magnitude, and I want enough funds to be able to take significant margin positions on a crapload on coins during volatility to make some of it back. This is what I mean by a hedge.

You "heard"?

I'd look at the charts before even trying to trade in the BTC market Cheesy



1173. Post 3669378 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: MoreFun on November 22, 2013, 12:08:14 AM
Any particular reason why the bitcoin price would surge due to merchant adoption? Let's all be honest with each other, bitcoin is still hard as fuck to use for the average person when buying something. Couple that with the volatility and there's just no incentive for anyone to use bitcoin over dollars.

All it would achieve is bring in more speculators who want in on the craze because they think they might make some profit. Yes that might surge the price temporarily, but it would drop just as fast as soon as everyone realizes everyone else is just here to make profits.

Are you frozenlock or why you have his image?

He is definitely not Frozenlock.   I have no idea why he stole his image, or why we have not heard from Frozen for quite a while.   I would speculate Frozen never bought back in after the April correction, since he said he was not holding through the fall again, and was expecting prices to fall much further than they did.   This guy who stole his avatar said in a post he only got into BTC this year.

He is not, much different type of thinking and writing yea. I think he bought back, at least he said he ended daytrading cause this fucked him up.

Nice stories, but either he told you them privately or you are making them up: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=13296;sa=showPosts

Smiley


He didn't tell me. I am thinking that he learnt some things in the meantime like not daytrading if you suck at it and not going against the strong trend for too long.

Yep, you might "be thinking", but he never said "he quit daytrading cause this fucked him up", at least in these forums Wink



1174. Post 3669521 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 22, 2013, 12:27:53 AM
What's really going to matter for the rest of the franchises, is whether these participating Subways are seeing any significant revenue via Bitcoin.  

You went finally all in?



1175. Post 3669563 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 22, 2013, 12:33:06 AM
What's really going to matter for the rest of the franchises, is whether these participating Subways are seeing any significant revenue via Bitcoin.  

You went finally all in?

It was a neutral observation but yes, tis true.  I have hung up my bear claws.  Though I always kept some BTC, I could have had more.  Working on correcting that as we speak.   Wink

What can I say...I was wrong. 

And how that XRP investment went?

Sorry, I cannot help it, I remember those summer debates we had Smiley



1176. Post 3669621 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 22, 2013, 12:42:37 AM

And how that XRP investment went?

Sorry, I cannot help it, I remember those summer debates we had Smiley

My views on Ripple haven't changed at all.  If anything, they have grown stronger.  And yes I still hold XRP but that has little to do with my faith in Ripple as the payment network of the future.  

Ouch. Hope you bought those XRP with USD and not with BTC Wink



1177. Post 3672549 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 22, 2013, 08:47:12 AM
Slowly but surely everyone is starting to figure it out. What's happening right now happened before in March. Almost identical charts. One more crazy run-the-train-of-its-rails rally is brewing.  It's going to be epic.

If we go crazy from here (we are already well above/ahead of the long-term trend), the inevitable result is crash. That is the way turbulence works. This makes it relevant to try to estimate the top and the bottom.

My take:
- Top $2200, bottom $475. Before Christmas.

Sounds good Smiley

I see a lot of controlled profit taking around $700 (stamp), and not a hint of fear/panic. Consolidation at $700? Will a big holder crap his pants and market sell a couple thousands of coins? Will a big investor do the opposite?

Almost 50/50 chances for everything. Fasten your seat belts and place your bid and asks, gentlemen Smiley



1178. Post 3672660 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: niothor on November 22, 2013, 09:08:54 AM
Again and again , why does it have to either crash or go to the moon , can't it have a week of relaxation around this comfy 700 price?

Because this is Bitcoin Cheesy



1179. Post 3672703 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Holy shit.

$33M bids on Gox. $14.65M bids on Bitstamp.

That's ATH in bids - and we are breaking an ATH in bids every day.

Engines warming up? Rocket about to ignite to the moon?

Risto, when do you plan to buy back at a loss - or you already did? (please bear with me Smiley)



1180. Post 3672856 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):




1181. Post 3673056 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 22, 2013, 10:15:37 AM
Risto, when do you plan to buy back at a loss - or you already did? (please bear with me Smiley)

It is not that simple Smiley

- "My" holdings are held through multiple organizations, which also have other stockholders, and they all have their different targets for investment allocation.

- Then there are arbitrage, OTC, and exchange operations that require fiat capital and are more profitable when there is high volatility, prompting to have more fiat at those times since it generates more BTC as the arbitrages are juicier (while also providing hedge against catastrophic loss when most needed).

- Then there is our family target of having a balanced allocation of crypto, precious metals, RE and other. Since crypto is the only one that tends to appreciate, if I sell too much and the price-chasing does not work, the situation corrects itself naturally and soon I am again looking for a new bubble to sell into.

=> If I make a move, I do it based on thorough analysis (thousands of lines of Excel data and hours of analysis before this one), have considered all the possible outcomes and assessed the probabilities, found a positive expected value (where the value function is a complex aggregate of all the goals of the different actors whose wealth I manage) and a bearable worst case. Then I see how it unfolds, and pocket the profit or loss according to the plan.

If bitcoin goes up, it is a profit really, because it opens up new opportunities to influence the world to the better. Also in this case it rewards us with a 7-figure fiat position.

If it goes down, then my greatest pleasure is that my market analysis was correct, and I also get to cash out a small amount of fiat, and keep the bitcoin count the same or even slightly increase it. So this is also profit.

With bitcoin, you cannot actually lose, that is the beauty of it  Kiss  Grin

A 7 figures fiat-position is just 2k coins ATM. In January this year, 2k BTC was just $40k Cheesy

BTW: Bitstamp bulls are preparing the assault to ATH ($750). Grabbing popcorn.



1182. Post 3675606 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Boxman90 on November 22, 2013, 03:30:16 PM
I think we're at or approaching 1 tx a second.. so we need 7x as many were getting now before we start to worry about that.

Imagine the utopian mass adoption that's being fed to the public.

Take a small country (or a large American city) with about 15 million inhabitants, or 5 million households.
Every household will have to do groceries about each other day, so that's 2.5 million customers in supermarkets each day countrywide.
Day has 24 hours, so that's 104166 transactions per hour
= 29 transactions per second

And this is for one small country only, for only the basic needs (food), and that's already 4 times what the Bitcoin network can physically handle.

You're not going to convince me that the Bitcoin protocol will ever be able to sustain a world economy for day-to-day transactions.

Hence why I'll always be bearish, even though it's a great market to profit from atm.

Nonsense. Only a retard would think that a block-chain based currency is efficient for day-by-day purchases as grocery shopping.

As warchwoord said 1MB max block hard limit was placed BY DESIGN. The point of BTC is the universal ledger and the possibility for everyone to run a full node. It's meant to be a safe and decentralized way to store and transfer value (among other things), not to be a micro payment network competing with Visa or PayPal.

99% of BTC economy is driven by investors and speculators, what makes you think that it has to change at some point? You don't buy groceries with gold neither.



1183. Post 3675717 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Given the fact that bitstamp is the only exchange serving USD withdrawals reliably, id say that the US is feeling bullish after the Senate hearings. It will be interesting when we couple with BTCChina.

The mother of all Bitcoin bubbles is not here yet, but you can start to smell it.



1184. Post 3675966 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Boxman90 on November 22, 2013, 03:52:42 PM
99% of BTC economy is driven by investors and speculators, what makes you think that it has to change at some point? You don't buy groceries with gold neither.

That is exactly my point as to why it would never be a CURRENCY in this format. Remember that this is the picture that is being fed to the general public, and they will invest based on this assumption. It took me weeks if not months of research to get a clear picture of what BTC is and how it is used - do not expect the general public to do the same right from the start. They will do that when the bubble starts to properly pop.

The general public doesn't care about paying con Bitcoin their groceries, the general public buys Bitcoin just because it is supposed to increase in value.



1185. Post 3676028 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: philip2000uk on November 22, 2013, 04:18:18 PM
I think we're at or approaching 1 tx a second.. so we need 7x as many were getting now before we start to worry about that.

Imagine the utopian mass adoption that's being fed to the public.

Take a small country (or a large American city) with about 15 million inhabitants, or 5 million households.
Every household will have to do groceries about each other day, so that's 2.5 million customers in supermarkets each day countrywide.
Day has 24 hours, so that's 104166 transactions per hour
= 29 transactions per second

And this is for one small country only, for only the basic needs (food), and that's already 4 times what the Bitcoin network can physically handle.

You're not going to convince me that the Bitcoin protocol will ever be able to sustain a world economy for day-to-day transactions.

Hence why I'll always be bearish, even though it's a great market to profit from atm.

Nonsense. Only a retard would think that a block-chain based currency is efficient for day-by-day purchases as grocery shopping.

As warchwoord said 1MB max block hard limit was placed BY DESIGN. The point of BTC is the universal ledger and the possibility for everyone to run a full node. It's meant to be a safe and decentralized way to store and transfer value (among other things), not to be a micro payment network competing with Visa or PayPal.

99% of BTC economy is driven by investors and speculators, what makes you think that it has to change at some point? You don't buy groceries with gold neither.
Are you calling the whole of Kenya a retard? they use it for day to day shopping for groceries.

I mean maybe it would cause more problems though if it was all fully mainstream

The whole Kenya is not using Bitcoin to buy groceries. Not a single city in Kenya is using Bitcoin to buy groceries. The current block soft-limit is 250kb. If a single city of Kenya was using Bitcoin to buy groceries, the 1MB hard-limit wouln't even be enough.



1186. Post 3676313 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on November 22, 2013, 04:53:04 PM
There's honestly no reason to be bearish on Bitcoin, for any reason, except the centralization of Bitcoin.  (Which seems they are proposing)  The only thing required to overcome the 1mb limit and maintain it, is to increase off blockchain transactions.  This is what Ripple is for and will allow Bitcoin transactions with virtually no limit.  

Though Ripple is centralized - does this not beat the purpose of Bitcoin entirely? In essence we'll have created a commodity like gold, but NOT a currency.

Even if Ripple were centralized, which it's not, it doesn't defeat the purpose at all.  Because the Ripple protocol is about transactions, not storing Bitcoins with no counter-party risk.  If you buy a Gyft card, you have to send BTC to Bitpay, a centralized company.  Is that an issue for you?  Using Ripple gateways is the same as this or any exchange.  Frankly at this point, it's not worth spelling out further because soon most consumers will be utilizing the Ripple network and won't even know it.  The point in my original comment was, there's already a working protocol that solves this.  That's why diehard Bitcoiners created Ripple, they knew the limitation of the Bitcoin payment network.  So, 7tps is not a reason to be bearish, centralization by the Bitcoin devs, would be however.



Ripple is based on trust. it will fail.

I'm having a deja-vu of the conversations we had in the Summer.

Coinseeker said BTC was doomed, that it was a joke, and that the future was Ripple. He said that BTC was a bad investment compared to Ripple.

We all know how that played out. BTC price surged 7 times and XRP has lost 12 times its value against BTC.

Well played, Coinseeker Wink



1187. Post 3676476 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 22, 2013, 04:59:09 PM


I'm having a deja-vu of the conversations we had in the Summer.

Coinseeker said BTC was doomed, that it was a joke, and that the future was Ripple. He said that BTC was a bad investment compared to Ripple.

We all know how that played out. BTC price surged 7 times and XRP has lost 12 times its value against BTC.

Well played, Coinseeker Wink

Ripple remains the future and XRP is holding quite stable verses the dollar.  Obviously verses BTC it's higher, because BTC is worth more now.   Genius.  Roll Eyes  And it was well played because I always kept BTC.   Wink

So BTC is/was the worst investment ever and was doomed to fail but STILL you "always kept BTC". Mmm... So basically you were just trolling?

Cool story.



1188. Post 3676551 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 22, 2013, 05:12:51 PM


I'm having a deja-vu of the conversations we had in the Summer.

Coinseeker said BTC was doomed, that it was a joke, and that the future was Ripple. He said that BTC was a bad investment compared to Ripple.

We all know how that played out. BTC price surged 7 times and XRP has lost 12 times its value against BTC.

Well played, Coinseeker Wink

Ripple remains the future and XRP is holding quite stable verses the dollar.  Obviously verses BTC it's higher, because BTC is worth more now.   Genius.  Roll Eyes  And it was well played because I always kept BTC.   Wink

So BTC is/was the worst investment ever and was doomed to fail but STILL you "always kept BTC". Mmm... So basically you were just trolling?

Cool story.

Quote where I said, "Bitcoin was/is the worst investment ever."  And it's still possible for Bitcoin to fail, so don't get too arrogant.  It's all still speculation.

This is the very first quote I found by looking at your profile, but there are at least hundreds more:

Quote from: Coinseeker on July 04, 2013, 05:49:28 AM
When someone can explain to me how Bitcoin plans to retain value without any real way to use them, maybe I'll be bullish again. But all indicators tell me that, Bitcoin is a sinking ship.  Doesn't matter what miners are using or doing.  Without mass adoption, it's just monopoly money, propped up by speculators.  And please, if you're going to try to spell it out for me, spare me the libertarian, bible thumping fantasies.  I need to hear something with real world substance. 

Your indicators indicated you very well.



1189. Post 3677742 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

This thread is quite bullish. Panic buying is in the air Cheesy



1190. Post 3677887 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

Quote from: mccorvic on November 22, 2013, 07:34:54 PM
Total bids past $35mil on Gox.  Pretty sure this is an ATH for that.

FYI:




1191. Post 3678272 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):

What once was heavy resistance on Stamp, now is healthy support ($750).

I'm sorry for the grey bearded old-timers who live in fear of the ghost of 2011, but I think it's already proven that 2013 is no 2011.



1192. Post 3679914 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.27h):




1193. Post 3689388 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Good. Let's shake out some weak hands.



1194. Post 3689503 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

About DPR:

Quote
Perhaps the most shocking revelation in the Justice Department’s argument against Ulbricht’s petition for bail is that he allegedly ordered not two but six executions. Unfortunately for DPR, he appears to have gotten scammed out of the money he paid for each hit (approximately a half million dollars in Bitcoins in total). On the bright side, despite the fact that Ulbricht said he received “visual confirmation” of the executions, the government says it was unable to confirm that any of the killings were ever carried out.

The government documents leave open several questions about the Silk Road merchant DPR hired to carry out the planned killings — a user who’d adopted the nickname “redandwhite” (apparently a well-worn nickname of the Hells Angels motorcycle gang). Was he a government informant who was working with federal prosecutors to nab Ulbricht, or was he just one of many Internet predators who make a living scamming the scammers?


http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/11/no-bail-for-alleged-silk-road-mastermind/

Scammed 6 times by redanwhite Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1195. Post 3689585 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: maz on November 23, 2013, 08:35:23 PM
About DPR:

Quote
Perhaps the most shocking revelation in the Justice Department’s argument against Ulbricht’s petition for bail is that he allegedly ordered not two but six executions. Unfortunately for DPR, he appears to have gotten scammed out of the money he paid for each hit (approximately a half million dollars in Bitcoins in total). On the bright side, despite the fact that Ulbricht said he received “visual confirmation” of the executions, the government says it was unable to confirm that any of the killings were ever carried out.

The government documents leave open several questions about the Silk Road merchant DPR hired to carry out the planned killings — a user who’d adopted the nickname “redandwhite” (apparently a well-worn nickname of the Hells Angels motorcycle gang). Was he a government informant who was working with federal prosecutors to nab Ulbricht, or was he just one of many Internet predators who make a living scamming the scammers?


http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/11/no-bail-for-alleged-silk-road-mastermind/

Scammed 6 times by redanwhite Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Honestly for several months I was in awe of what that guy's security must have been like, I sat and worked out what type of system setup I would have run and then analyzed it from a forensics point of view. I came to the conclusion he must have been pretty damn clever. I've never been so wrong. Guy was a freakin clown. Probably blinded by his egotism.

He sent his pic to a guy who knew that he was DPR, and that scammed him thousands of bitcoins now worth many million $

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

redanwhite: what a boss



1196. Post 3694971 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: UnDerDoG81 on November 24, 2013, 09:21:21 AM
Wow damn, trying not to panic sell. Bought 17.5 Coins at 766$ 2-3 days ago. I´m nervous to lose my 13.5k$

Just sell everything and forget about Bitcoin. If you are nervous it means you invested more than what you can afford to lose - that will make you too emotional and you will panic sell as soon as the price crashes (and there will be many crashes on the way up).

With that approach you will lose this game. The way to win this game? Invest what you can afford to lose and hold for the long run. Take some profits on the way, but hold onto the vast majority of your coins through bubbles and crashes. That strategy NEVER failed so far.



1197. Post 3701163 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 24, 2013, 01:36:08 PM
Quote
$350 is cheap, it is the ATH from 15 days ago Wink

$500 is a reasonable level to start buyback.

so you're buying back in now?

Now, meaning 'at the moment', I am not buying back in. The price is above $500. My average sale price is $672 and I am not a daytrader. It has to go down a lot before I care to buy back.

Beware my friend, Bitcoin has been well known to break every rule you have been living to so far, the choo choo train is leaving the station and when it finally does it will be waiting nobody.

Cheesy



1198. Post 3705972 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: hmmmstrange on November 25, 2013, 08:56:26 AM
+1 we haven't had a real crash for a long time.

Miners, y u no sell?

(They will eventually)

They have liquidated all their btc in the last 6 months to buy mining rigs and are in the process of rebuilding their stashes.

This. Rebuilding their stashes at a loss, which will make them to hold tighter.



1199. Post 3706106 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: windjc on November 25, 2013, 09:22:09 AM
I think the somewhat negative CCTV coverage is having an effect in China.

No. $$$ has been flowing out to arbitrage and flowing in to sell.

China is looking at Gox. Gox is looking at Stamp. Stamp just got new money into its exchange about an hour ago. Since then it has already risen 30 points.

Its coming my friend.

So: the exchange with bigger volume (BTCChina) is looking at the 2nd exchange in terms of volume (Gox), which is looking himself to the exchange with lower volume among the three (Stamp)?

I'd really like to understand how you did arrive to that conclusion, it seems pretty much counter intuitive to me.



1200. Post 3706212 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: BitPirate on November 25, 2013, 09:34:27 AM
I think the somewhat negative CCTV coverage is having an effect in China.

I missed this. What did they say?

They said : "bitcoin went too high too fast, big bubble danger, stay away"

Exactly that.

Perfect. Western financial media has been singing the same song lately, which just means that the short term growth potential is still huge.

When financial analysts start saying that BTC is a new paradigm and start advising to buy, that will be the right time to dump.



1201. Post 3707574 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

All rpietila coins are belong to us

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1202. Post 3707773 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: gandhibt on November 25, 2013, 12:58:48 PM
All rpietila coins are belong to us

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I have to say that I don't feel so sorry about the rich who lose major amount of coins, but I do feel sorry for the poor who give up their few coins to the rich.

Daytrading Bitcoins is a dangerous game, and a completely reckless game during a bull market.

Most in here delude themselves by seeing their fiat profits going up, so they don't feel so bad by losing coins.

I'd say that:

a) more than 5 trades per month is reckless, considering the high fees + slippage.
b) the only good moment to trade is a bear market - and there's is no bear market ATM (this could change in the next days/hours, but I wouldn't bet on it).



1203. Post 3707800 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on November 25, 2013, 01:02:18 PM
@rpietila, back on board, or still waiting for cheaper coins?
He's made it clear when he plans to re-enter..why not just let him say he's re-entering himself if he deviated from his plan which I doubt he would do without some major revelation.
And you should believe him; why exactly? Wink

He did give up advance warning of his Saturday night sell off, which I'm equating with that well planned multi-exchange 10K sell off.



I don't think he's gonna time stamp it for us... but he's not all out.. so why is it people try to troll him as if he doesn't have the required BtC to reap the rewards of to the moon scenarios.




Ristos post are very much appreciated (especially in his "second era" on Bitcointalk). We just make a bit of fun because his last "famous prediction" was $300k per coin by the end of 2013, and he made that prediction during the bear market that followed the bubble pop on April, 10th.

It's kinda funny that his last bold prediction is precisely a bear market during a bull run. He might be right and this bubble popped too one week ago, but its not yet confirmed at all - in fact the price has climbed since he sold.

TL;DR: we are just having some healthy fun.



1204. Post 3709735 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: the_sunship on November 25, 2013, 04:40:55 PM
The altcoins are sharply up today http://coinmarketcap.com/
Wondering if it has something to do with a posible weakness in bitcoin price.

ltc went to 10usd on bitcoin rally so its unrelated.

as bitcoin is $800+ at this point I think you're going to see a lot of the cryptos raise in price. People are interested in BTC, but a price close to Google's stock seems too much for most "average" people.

I think it's just a new awareness of this new "virtual currency" movement.  It's like the british invasion - Bitcoin being the Beatles.

This kind of flawed logic has been repeated over and over since Bitcoin hit dollar parity.

When Bitcoin hit $10, many noobs said that new people would have invested in Litecoin because BTC price was too high.

Same thing when it hit $100

Same thing when it will hit $1000

But still, everybody knows that Bitcoin is the real thing, and the rest just clones and scamcoins.



1205. Post 3710275 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: micalith on November 25, 2013, 05:31:23 PM
But still, everybody knows that Bitcoin is the real thing, and the rest just clones and scamcoins.
Scamcoins are like gambling, poor people clinging to delusions of riches ripped off by those who understand the game.

Word.  One of my favorite things in life is to find an altcoin supporter and whittle away their arguments until they literally admit "I don't care, I just want USD!"

I dabble a fair bit in altcoins. Why? Well, I don't care, I just want bitcoins!

Making BTC from scamcoins is possible, but extremely difficult. Most of the times you will end up losing BTC if you mess with scamcoins - I know by heart. I was lucky enough to buy LTC at 0.002BTC, I sold for good when it went at aprox. 0.02, and I think I will never ever invest again in LTC. I feel lucky (because it was just sheer luck, a silly gamble that paid off), now I won't test my luck any more.

For the record: I lost BTC with XRP and with some other scamcoin. Not a lot in absolute terms because I took those as a game, but a lot in relative (%) terms.



1206. Post 3710625 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on November 25, 2013, 06:09:14 PM
you should get yourself a tractor goat

diamonds are great and all, but hydraulics are a boy's best friend

i want a race car.

So, no Lambo yet? I guess it's a bout time Wink



1207. Post 3710673 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 25, 2013, 06:11:18 PM
you should get yourself a tractor goat

diamonds are great and all, but hydraulics are a boy's best friend

i want a race car.

I already put payment down for a 458. You should get Lambo and we can do a trip together Cheesy


I'm more for the vintage models, but still....




1208. Post 3710749 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: thetopham on November 25, 2013, 06:13:07 PM
$1000 invested, 1.25 coins O.O

LOL!!

I remember how I sold $1000 worth of coins to my best friend in January this year... I told him he couldn't afford to lose the opportunity, and he said "ok, WTF, take $1,000 and send me some of that magic internet money"...

Do you know how many coins I sold him?

BTC71

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Crazy bitcoin, so crazy... And you have to know that at that time it seemed very expensive to him. He told me "come on man, can't you round it up and give me 100 coins? This is crazy, $1,000 hard earned dollars for 70 monopoly-like tokens" Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I will add that Bitcoin ALWAYS feel expensive when you first buy it. But it's not.




1209. Post 3710795 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: BitChick on November 25, 2013, 06:21:56 PM
Is 800 the new 15 and or 130???

hmmm

You have to ask?

How about this, $15 you sell your wife to buy BTC

If its $130, you buy yourself another wife

Deal?


yeah, i more or less did something like that... going all in at $3 was pretty hard for a while.



anyway she is getting a very nice ring for christmas. diamonds and gold is still are she really cares about, lol. silly girls.

 

I am a girl and I would prefer Bitcoins to Diamonds at this point!  Why?  In a year or two I could get 10 or even 100 for the price of 1!   Grin  I have always loved a great deal.  Bitcoin could be the best "deal" ever!  

We will see though.  I was complaining this morning that so far our investment in Bitcoin has only grown in the virtual world. We have not yet seen any benefits from it in the physical world.  We will start pulling some out in a year or so I think, depending on how fast and high it grows.  

Do not forget to take profits on the way up.



1210. Post 3710858 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on November 25, 2013, 06:26:16 PM
Is 800 the new 15 and or 130???

hmmm

You have to ask?

How about this, $15 you sell your wife to buy BTC

If its $130, you buy yourself another wife

Deal?


yeah, i more or less did something like that... going all in at $3 was pretty hard for a while.



anyway she is getting a very nice ring for christmas. diamonds and gold is still are she really cares about, lol. silly girls.

 

I am a girl and I would prefer Bitcoins to Diamonds at this point!  Why?  In a year or two I could get 10 or even 100 for the price of 1!   Grin  I have always loved a great deal.  Bitcoin could be the best "deal" ever!  

We will see though.  I was complaining this morning that so far our investment in Bitcoin has only grown in the virtual world. We have not yet seen any benefits from it in the physical world.  We will start pulling some out in a year or so I think, depending on how fast and high it grows.  

Do not forget to take profits on the way up.

exactly, my wife has more bitcoins than most people on the forum. she held and now she wants some bling. she is young so whatever. its not like she is selling a significant amount.

BTC appreciated so much that somebody that bought aprox. 1 year ago (lets say 2012, or even Jan-Feb 2013) now has such a massive amount of unrealized profits (50x- 60x) that by selling only 10% of their stash they would be looking to at least a 5x profit compared to their initial investment... While continuing to hold to 90% of their stash. Not realizing profits in that scenario is plain dumb IMO, we all need some bling Wink



1211. Post 3711125 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: thetopham on November 25, 2013, 06:41:33 PM
$1000 invested, 1.25 coins O.O

LOL!!

I remember how I sold $1000 worth of coins to my best friend in January this year... I told him he couldn't afford to lose the opportunity, and he said "ok, WTF, take $1,000 and send me some of that magic internet money"...

Do you know how many coins I sold him?

BTC71

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Crazy bitcoin, so crazy... And you have to know that at that time it seemed very expensive to him. He told me "come on man, can't you round it up and give me 100 coins? This is crazy, $1,000 hard earned dollars for 70 monopoly-like tokens" Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I will add that Bitcoin ALWAYS feel expensive when you first buy it. But it's not.



damn, $1000 becomes 56800 in a year? wtf?

In less than a year, Sir. I sold him the coins at the beginning of January 2013 - and yes, I bought them back from Gox as soon as I sold them to my friend Wink



1212. Post 3711158 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.28h):

Quote from: NUFCrichard on November 25, 2013, 06:43:06 PM
Is he still a friend?

Yes indeed, now I'm a "genius" for him.

Last funny thing: he told me at the beginning of October: "hey man, $10k is a lot of money for me, I think I will sell, if then "some day" Bitcoin arrives to $1k x BTC I will hit myself in the head, but now I know that I could use the money..."

I told him: "$1k per coin? That's nothing. That's around the corner. We will go through $1k before you can even notice it, like a hot knife through butter". So he decided to hold a little more... And like 5 days later the rally began Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

The guy is now so happy you can't even believe it. But, bad thing, he is now fully convinced  that he has to hold forever and he will probably become a billionaire with his 70 coins. I told him many times: do not forget to reap some profits on the way up, this thing could very well go to 0 at some point... At least enjoy some of the profit, never go full fiat and always keep the vast majority of your coins for the long run, but don't be greedy and sell some on the way up, you need to give a piece of the pie also to the ones coming behind you Wink



1213. Post 3712956 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 25, 2013, 09:21:49 PM
Staggering all the way down to $100, with increasing buy amounts on the way down.  Time to take some money.
Are you really putting in new money, ie money you haven't gained from Bitcoin? If so, you surprise me.

Probably the good old proudhon realized that being a bear didn't play so well. Wink

Considering how long he has been around, id say that the chunk of his net worth represented by Bitcoin should be so big that allocating new money wouldn't make much of a difference.



1214. Post 3712975 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: beetcoin on November 25, 2013, 09:34:00 PM
fucking coinbase.. i was going to get some BTC to buy me some LTC shares, but now it's gone up to $11 on btc-e, while BTC has remaind the same.

"LTC shares".

If Bitcoin is still alive in a couple of years, these forums are going to be pure insanity.



1215. Post 3713041 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: macsga on November 25, 2013, 09:39:51 PM
WTF did I just read? Shocked  Shocked Shocked

Wow, this is so fucked up at so many levels

What's so difficult to understand about BUY AND HOLD?

You just have to see the fucking chart and realize that the historical yearly gains of B&H are so huge that selling your coins it's just playing Russian roulette, unless you are securing your profits and not deluding yourself while you dream about "beating the market". BTC it's not the fucking FOREX

And in other news: "LTC shares"

Good lord help us



1216. Post 3713117 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: chrsjrcj on November 25, 2013, 09:48:42 PM

Holy shit what a fucking moron. Some people REALLY need to be protected from themselves. Obviously, no risk no gain but people like that don't deserve that amount of money.

No they don't deserve it, and that's why he has nearly lost it all. Unfortunately for his sister too.

So sad. No sense of responsibility at all, his ONLY duty is to protect that money and instead investing a small chunk he gambles it all by day trading Bitcoin.

Honestly, I feel a lot of pity for his sister - not at all for him.



1217. Post 3713240 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: ardana123 on November 25, 2013, 09:54:37 PM
I'm thinking he must be a troll. No way anyone can be that reckless.

Definitely losing 75% of your capital by trading an asset that went from $13 to $900 in less than one year sounds fishy. You really need to be a special kind of retard to do that.



1218. Post 3713442 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Risto panic bought and went all in again?

Cheesy



1219. Post 3713488 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Well, I see healthy profit taking and weak hands shaken.

I wouldn't bet a significant amount on it going down significantly, but maybe I'm biased and just euphoric Cheesy

Blitz, say with me: no 2011 ever again

Cheesy



1220. Post 3713692 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 25, 2013, 10:28:10 PM
Well, I see healthy profit taking and weak hands shaken.

I wouldn't bet a significant amount on it going down significantly, but maybe I'm biased and just euphoric Cheesy

Blitz, say with me: no 2011 ever again

Cheesy
In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any phony central bank's blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my intelligence. Cheesy

Well, I'm euphoric just because I've had some good wine Wink



1221. Post 3713951 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Poor bears, pockets full of fiat and heart full of pain, loneliness and despair.

Pro tip: Coinseeker has historically been a counter indicator. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1222. Post 3713967 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Big money wants in, don't be fooled by the big fish who patiently waits for cheaper coins.

This is no 2011, the stakes are much higher this time.



1223. Post 3714052 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on November 25, 2013, 11:11:12 PM
Big money wants in, don't be fooled by the big fish who patiently waits for cheaper coins.

This is no 2011, the stakes are much higher this time.

lots of coins were bought... but it means nothing still...there have bene small lifts off since Friday into Monday no after burn though.

I will agree there was a lot of volume in that quick window.. but if its new money.. and this doesn't cause lift off.. imagine those weak hands.. with 850 coins Cheesy

After reading that catastrophic 750k inheritance disaster story on reddit,..where not only did he get raped on the initial asset sale.. he then goes and buys at 850.. sells at 500 or something.. either way lost about 75k in a trade.

These kind of people see bitcoin and go herp derp I'll triple my money.. and then they try to day trade like there financial super stars.

You will see more of the heard into Bitcoin, and they will just bring in liquidity.



1224. Post 3714101 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: LRENZ on November 25, 2013, 11:14:58 PM
I panicked a little earlier and have a sale of 0.44 BTC for 223.08 GBP pending on localbitcoins, fortunately the seller hasn't responded yet, I'm pleading for him to cancel ! I hope he does but hes under no obligation to do so. I was planning on buying back in at a lower price, thinking we might see the $600s again. The stability of the past 3 or 4 days has been making me really edgy for some reason though I'm very confident Bitcoin will go into quadruple digits next year but at the moment I think it's too soon. I'm imagining a lot of sell offs before christmas but at this rate who knows!

Well if this is the general sentiment it just means that we are going up and fast.



1225. Post 3714289 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: DaRude on November 25, 2013, 11:35:17 PM
And so much for all of that TA, all useless when on person can move a market 10%

Welcome to Bitcoin Cheesy



1226. Post 3718512 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 26, 2013, 01:02:56 AM
One person can move the market much more than 10%

Who?  Satoshi?

Last I thought was the "Satoshi" stash was around 1,070,000 Bitcoins.  Loaded doesn't have 2-3 wallets ranging from 40,000 - 80,000 bitcoins.  There wasn't just 200,000 coins shuffled for a few laughs.  Estimated individuals holding more than 10,000 coins each is in the hundreds.  Exchanges don't profit in both bitcoin and fiat and have no reason for either.  A 10% market change right now would take ~2,500 coins but your right, Mr/Mrs/Ms Nakamoto must be the only person capable of such a feat.

"Buy All The Bitcoins!"

I just want the Satoshi handle to come back online in this forum and say "I told you so" and then disappear forever. Either that or move those 1,000,000 coins so everyone can stop and go "holy shit he is alive" and then let the frenzy begin. We will be at 10,000 by the end of the year. No one would be selling only buying. The founder lives! The mythical man exists.

If Satoshi moves the coins, the price will (temporarily) take a dive. The market has (rightfully) not priced in a 100% possibility that Satoshi is still able to access his coins. The chance of him not being able to might be small, but even 1% of his holdings is 10k BTC, >8$M.

This. Satoshi moves his coins, the price tanks.



1227. Post 3718549 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Poor bears, the choo choo train is leaving the station and they were caught taking a dump, with their pants down.

Risto, did you finally bought back in? Can you give us the details for educational purposes?



1228. Post 3720801 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Poor bears!!




1229. Post 3721797 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Big money wants in, big money still uses gox and gives zero fucks about Goxbux, they just want coins.

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1230. Post 3721860 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: maz on November 26, 2013, 02:36:07 PM
Big money wants in, big money still uses gox and gives zero fucks about Goxbux, they just want coins.

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Lies,

No new money would use Gox. This is old fiat, with cobwebs on it from Gox's cellar.

Cool story bro.

New money still uses Gox because it has historically been the most reliable and trustworthy exchange. Big money gives zero fucks about Goxbucks, they just want fresh and juicy coins.



1231. Post 3722524 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: mccorvic on November 26, 2013, 03:11:45 PM
Rocket remains fueled. Very silly to sell now with intent of buying back.

Agreed. Sweet spot to secure some profits for those who bought at low double digits or single digits, bad spot for those hoping to buy back significantly lower.

This train is headed to Alpha Centauri. Next stop, the moon.



1232. Post 3722582 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: niothor on November 26, 2013, 03:24:41 PM
Gox people are afraid price isn't going lower like they hoped, so they have to buy back in like they are doing now. The majority didn't sell because they wanted cash, they sold because the rise was to fast and they thought they could buy back in lower. Before we see new money coming in the next weeks. Stamp people actually can cash out, so there is more resistance, that's why their price is lower and rises slower. This is the exchange to watch in my opinion. China still spooked, because they had a bigger correction and some minor bearish news ( CCTV ). They will catch up when they see new ATH's on american exchanges. 


What was the minor bearish news about?


About advising people that the price is unstable and it's not safe to invest too much in it during this time.

This is extremely bullish. You know how this works, and never fails:

1) when everybody says "it is a bubble" (like now on mainstream media), its because it's not.
2) when the "pro" financial advisors say "do not invest, this is too risky" (as they are saying now), it means that you definitely have to buy and hold
3) when everybody says "it is a new paradigm, best investment ever", the its a bubble that it is about to pop
4) when "pro" financial advisors say "get in, it is a safe investment", then it is definitely the moment to GET OUT

We are currently at points 1) and 2), the path to be followed is very clear.

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1233. Post 3722745 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 26, 2013, 03:31:55 PM
China isn't moving because the Chinese are asleep.

China is down -5.7% over 3 days.

Also the arbitrage is closed, which means that west will have to raise the price to $1,000 by themselves.

We are also more than 2x ahead of the long-term trend, which is a very extended position.

Bid/ask charts are quite tilted towards the latter. Especially noteworthy is the lack of bids $700+

Volume is low.


Ch00000000000000........

EDIT: the last one is pronounced: "irrational exuberance is running rampant in the forum, expecting price to rise based on previous rise"

We all know you are praying for cheaper coins, Risto - just try to keep it serious, right?

There is a $5M wall on Gox at $800 - $12.2M till $700. That's 33% of the bids from $700 to the current price, that's a healthy depth.

On Bitstamp the situation is pretty much the same - aprox. of 30% of the bids are placed between the current price and $700.

So... That's a "lack of bids" in your book? Historically most of the bids have been placed from 0 to 50% of the price at a given moment. That's normal in BTC because everybody is trying to profit from the big volatility. Right now 75% of the bids are placed above 50% of the current price.

The bid depth is looking bullish no matter what, my friend.



1234. Post 3722972 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: maz on November 26, 2013, 03:58:06 PM
China isn't moving because the Chinese are asleep.

China is down -5.7% over 3 days.

Also the arbitrage is closed, which means that west will have to raise the price to $1,000 by themselves.

We are also more than 2x ahead of the long-term trend, which is a very extended position.

Bid/ask charts are quite tilted towards the latter. Especially noteworthy is the lack of bids $700+

Volume is low.


Ch00000000000000........

EDIT: the last one is pronounced: "irrational exuberance is running rampant in the forum, expecting price to rise based on previous rise"

We all know you are praying for cheaper coins, Risto - just try to keep it serious, right?

So your only serious if your blindly emotionally peeing your pants to the moon bullish, but if you compare some market trends and hint at being bearish your not?

-5 credibility for you.

What its not serious is to say that there is a lack of bids $700+ when he is an old timer and perfectly knows that having +30% of the total bids concentrated in the spread between $850 and $700 (which is LESS than a 20% spread) is extremely bullish and quite uncommon in the BTC market.

If you look at the depth we had months ago, usually 50% of the bids were 50% below the price - now only 25% are below 50% of the current price, and 75% are above.

This is one of the most bullish market depth scenarios we have seen in BTC, ever.



1235. Post 3723596 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on November 26, 2013, 04:50:38 PM
900's being a real cocktease.

I really don't get the guys who pile their sell orders on $900. If you think it won't break ATH, just spread your asks below $900. If you think it will break ATH, just pull the ask and let the price slide upwards.

Really, placing an ask on ATH is something I will never understand, but people does that a lot. Never understood the logic in it unless its pure manipulation (inducing the market to think that the resistance on ATH is too high so the price can just go down).



1236. Post 3723771 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 26, 2013, 05:05:21 PM
There is really no explanation needed. Market wants up.

Why don't you buy some then? No one with actual money is on the buy side, that is why market is not going up despite your wish.

Well, is not going down neither - in fact it went up since you sold your coins.

Sad



1237. Post 3723963 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Poor bears....

Better buy back at a loss now.



1238. Post 3724823 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: niothor on November 26, 2013, 05:30:29 PM
Poor bears....

Better buy back at a loss now.

You know , when you were sprouting stuff like it's gonna fall to 40 to raise back to 200 , although I din't agree with you I spent my time reading your arguments.
Now , when you turned bull and we share the same opinion , I find you posts lack something .. or more of something.

I was just trying to troll a bit and be a contrarian Blitz, but I guess you are right and I'm spamming to much nonsense, sorry for that.



1239. Post 3725733 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: kurious on November 26, 2013, 07:19:52 PM
Nice to be back, I did a little day trip to beautiful small mountain town called Ronda. So seems like we are going higher and rpietila still try's to talk crash here =) Well let bears be bears. Nice to see some real buying, been a bit quiet lately. When we break 1000 USD, there will be major media coverage. $999 is maybe a bit expensive while $1001 is cheap coins.

One thing rpietila said today:

"You know, we kind of decided that $900 is the cap for now".

'We decided...'?

Hmmm.... It's held so far.

Not for long.

They did already decide that we would have seen $300k by this year, and we all know how that played out so far Smiley

While $300k per coin in such a short time frame is plain and simply delusional (neither the infrastructure nor human psychology can support that kind of flash-growth), calling a bear market now is quite a risky move too. I'd say the truth is definitely in the middle: we won't see $300k per coin in the next few months, but we won't see either a bear market now that BTC has really attracted the interest of the real pro speculators and finance world.

This is no 2011, and the reason is simple: this time big money wants in, for real.



1240. Post 3725759 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on November 26, 2013, 07:26:05 PM
4 digit in 3, 2, 1 …

We can finally agree that 2013 is no 2011?

In other news, I hope Risto tell us when he will hit the stop loss button and buy back.



1241. Post 3725793 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Rampion on November 26, 2013, 07:43:21 PM
Nice to be back, I did a little day trip to beautiful small mountain town called Ronda. So seems like we are going higher and rpietila still try's to talk crash here =) Well let bears be bears. Nice to see some real buying, been a bit quiet lately. When we break 1000 USD, there will be major media coverage. $999 is maybe a bit expensive while $1001 is cheap coins.

One thing rpietila said today:

"You know, we kind of decided that $900 is the cap for now".

'We decided...'?

Hmmm.... It's held so far.

Not for long.

They did already decide that we would have seen $300k by this year, and we all know how that played out so far Smiley

While $300k per coin in such a short time frame is plain and simply delusional (neither the infrastructure nor human psychology can support that kind of flash-growth), calling a bear market now is quite a risky move too. I'd say the truth is definitely in the middle: we won't see $300k per coin in the next few months, but we won't see either a bear market now that BTC has really attracted the interest of the real pro speculators and finance world.

This is no 2011, and the reason is simple: this time big money wants in, for real.

Funny, I wrote this before seeing the ATH. Fasten your seal bets gents.



1242. Post 3725820 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 26, 2013, 07:48:10 PM


This made me LOL so fucking hard i almost peed my pants.



1243. Post 3725845 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: humanitee on November 26, 2013, 07:49:11 PM
Large new client incoming.

Hope everyone is enjoying the ride.

Now managing 200kBTC.

Who the fuck are you!?

God damn man! God damn!

A real whale.

Just pray for him cashing out slowly and gently, he controls almost 1% of the coins that will EVER exist.



1244. Post 3725938 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: justusranvier on November 26, 2013, 07:52:36 PM


This made me LOL so fucking hard i almost passed my pants.

How can you pass your pants???
It would require a rather impressive digestive system.

Writing from my cell, I edited it Smiley



1245. Post 3726011 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Dollar heading to 0, now $1 is almost 0.001 BTC and going down fast... Sell!!!

So, truth time: who panic bought there?

And then, just look at the depth till $1000. Almost 10k coins on Stamp, and then? Only 3k coins to $8000.

People really believes in psychological barriers and such, a lot want out at $900-$1000. Weak hands will never learn. Anyhow I guess that at $1,000 there is a lot of people that won't have to worry about money ever again.




1246. Post 3726066 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: molecular on November 26, 2013, 08:04:20 PM
Dollar heading to 0, now $1 is almost 0.001 BTC and going down fast... Sell!!!

So, truth time: who panic bought there?

And then, just look at the depth till $1000. Almost 10k coins on Stamp, and then? Only 3k coins to $8000.

People really believes in psychological barriers and such, a lot want out at $900-$1000. Weak hands will never learn. Anyhow I guess that at $1,000 there is a lot of people that won't have to worry about money ever again.



getting out at $900 is like getting out at $9 on steroids


Agreed. And you know what happened with the guys that cashed out at $9-$14 after the 2011 bubble pop. They got 1-2 millions, bought nice cars and houses, and now just don't log in the forums to be able to forget that they would now have close to $100M.

Pretty mind blowing stuff. That real-life stories are a good example of how you play this game: you invest what you can afford to lose, and you go for the long run, holding to the majority of your coins. The potential and growth are so huge that by gradually cashing out you can live OK while holding to the vast majority of your coins.



1247. Post 3726456 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 26, 2013, 08:22:48 PM
Pretty mind blowing stuff. That real-life stories are a good example of how you play this game: you invest what you can afford to lose, and you go for the long run, holding to the majority of your coins. The potential and growth are so huge that by gradually cashing out you can live OK while holding to the vast majority of your coins.

I have developed the concept of "rake", which in this context means the (average) percent of your holdings that you sell, every time the price doubles. This is applicable in the situation where you are unloading the coins. If you are still accumulating, it naturally does not hold.

According to the virgin-money-flow-model, the average rake is 17%, which means that each 1000x increase (consisting of 10 succeeding doublings) dilutes your holdings by 84%, formula: 1-(1-17%)^10.

If you want to play tigher, choose 10% rake for 65% dilution.
If you are OK to play looser, 30% rake dilutes 97% of your coins away, but the remaining 3% are still worth 30x more than all the coins in the beginning.

More about it.

I have to say that my "exit" strategy is very similar to your "rake" concept. It worked well so far, I still have the vast majority of my coins but I will live quite better in 2014.



1248. Post 3728749 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on November 26, 2013, 11:24:33 PM


If you run fast enough you may still be able to get on  Wink choo choo

These "losing the train" pics are killing me. TheKozi: I miss your songs and animated gifs, it's about time for some more.

Maybe we should create a thread only for "losing the train" kind of pics?

Guys: imagine the kind of pain those who dared to short bitcoins are into. We had a couple of those guys during the summer, do you remember them?

I'd say that daytrading BTC is really a reckless game: if you do very well you might be able to double your Bitcoins, but given its meteoric rise just losing 10% of them is such a loss that the risk/reward ratio its not worth it. I know I'm writing this in hostile territory (wall observer thread, speculation subforum).



1249. Post 3728860 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

The big crash is coming and blah blah blah
Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




1250. Post 3728885 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Well, full bubble mode ON - again

We just had a healthy profit taking phase in which price consolidated before this next leg in the parabolic rise. It was so clear it was blinding. Big money wants in this time.

Infrastructure will be tested hard again, and didn't improve shit in the last couple of years. Stress test on its way, real world moves slowly.

Anyhow: shall we agree that its about time for the bears to buy back at a loss - shall we?



1251. Post 3728922 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: humanitee on November 26, 2013, 11:42:45 PM
Well, full bubble mode ON - again

We just had a healthy profit taking phase in which price consolidated before this next leg in the parabolic rise. It was so clear it was blinding. Big money wants in this time.

Infrastructure will be tested hard again, and didn't improve shit in the last couple of years. Stres test on its way, real world moves slowly.

Anyhow: shall we agree that its about time for the bears to buy back at a loss - shall we?

If China breaks $1000 first, I agree. If China does not, I disagree.

China led the the previous leg up - now IMO the West is taking over, in part because of the effect of the Secondmarket ETF and the US Senate hearing.

First time we see a global, coordinated BTC rally.



1252. Post 3729025 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: batcoin on November 26, 2013, 11:47:54 PM
Well, full bubble mode ON - again

We just had a healthy profit taking phase in which price consolidated before this next leg in the parabolic rise. It was so clear it was blinding. Big money wants in this time.

Infrastructure will be tested hard again, and didn't improve shit in the last couple of years. Stres test on its way, real world moves slowly.

Anyhow: shall we agree that its about time for the bears to buy back at a loss - shall we?

If China breaks $1000 first, I agree. If China does not, I disagree.

China led the the previous leg up - now IMO the West is taking over, in part because of the effect of the Secondmarket ETF and the US Senate hearing.

First time we see a global, coordinated BTC rally.

You sure China isn't still leading?



I entertain the idea that they led; then they took a break and now followed the West.

In any case, you might be right. It's a perfect storm nevertheless.



1253. Post 3729500 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 27, 2013, 12:23:48 AM

I saw this. Where do they find these idiots? Cheesy

But its so bullish. The guy is so anti-bitcoin but still he has to admit it can very well go to $1M per coin, and he closes the article with that statement. He has to.

How bullish is that?

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1254. Post 3729563 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 27, 2013, 12:38:32 AM

But its so bullish. The guy is so anti-bitcoin but still he has to admit it can very well go to $1M per coin, and he closes the article with that statement. He has to.

How bullish is that?

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Not bullish at all. Don't listen to anything this idiot has to say. Bearish, bullish or otherwise.

Its uber-bullish price wise. He hates BTC, he doesn't understand shit about BTC, he tries to bash BTC, but still he HAS to close its article saying that it might very well go to $1M per coin.

He has to admit: "anyhow, this thing might be unstoppable".

So bullish it hurts.



1255. Post 3732943 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 26, 2013, 09:23:36 AM
some large buyings at bitstamp, but still pretty walled by that 1500 btc guy

as long as he remains sitting there, bitstamp won't follow gox

whales creating arb lol

You know, we kind of decided that $900 is the cap for now.

I know.



1256. Post 3733351 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Be cheerful guys, we just came out from a parabolic growth phase unharmed and without a bear market following a pop. On the contrary, we resumed a healthy upswing at a sustainable pace.

Now we need the infrastructure to catch up. Bitstamp and Gox cannot manage world exposure. I never thought I would say this, but best thing would be a big player buying Gox to build a serious and solid exchange.



1257. Post 3733507 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: solex on November 27, 2013, 09:07:28 AM
Be cheerful guys, we just came out from a parabolic growth phase unharmed and without a bear market following a pop. On the contrary, we resumed a healthy upswing at a sustainable pace.

Now we need the infrastructure to catch up. Bitstamp and Gox cannot manage world exposure. I never thought I would say this, but best thing would be a big player buying Gox to build a serious and solid exchange.

Calling WU.


Western Union? It would be so good. Karpeles all set for life (and his kids and the kids of his kids), and finally a serious and liquid exchange that can manage this insane exponential growth we are witnessing.




1258. Post 3733808 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

STAMP:

9k coins to $1k
5k coins from $1k to $8k

All the newborn millionaires want to cash out at $1k

They do not realize that we will go up to 5 digits like a hot knife through butter once that the $1k resistance is broken.



1259. Post 3734016 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: niothor on November 27, 2013, 09:52:52 AM
STAMP:

9k coins to $1k
5k coins from $1k to $8k

All the newborn millionaires want to cash out at $1k

They do not realize that we will go up to 5 digits like a hot knife through butter once that the $1k resistance is broken.

Dude, do you ever sleep?

You seem to be compatible with about 3 different time zones!!

Judging by his overall posts he gets some healthy 4-6 hours of sleep.
Most of us won't make it till 80 anyhow Smiley))

Yep, you got me Wink



1260. Post 3736834 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

$1000 here we come.

Those who say that Bitcoin will crash soon are just delusional. First we will reach AT LEAST gold parity (mark my words)

Prepare the champagne, gentlemen.



1261. Post 3736919 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: silvermario on November 27, 2013, 02:45:12 PM
So what do you think guys when we hit $1000, will it be like when we hit $900 the first time, with a 30% correction, or will it be like when we hit $900 this second time, with a huge pump towards around $1030?

90% correction to double digits

Keep dreaming.

Why don't you put your money where your mouth is and short bitcoins with 1:10 leverage? And then report back, please.



1262. Post 3736962 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

$1,000!!!!!



1263. Post 3737439 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 27, 2013, 03:12:15 PM
Congratulations!  Bulls win!   Grin

Please keep going with the bearish posts. Those are the best contrary indicators we ever had in these forums.



1264. Post 3737974 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 27, 2013, 03:23:00 PM
Breaking news on CNN.  Bitcoin breaks $1000.

http://money.cnn.com/?hpt=sitenav

WTF http://money.cnn.com/2013/11/25/technology/bitcoin-silk-road/index.html?iid=HP_Highlight

"Bitcoin creator may have ties to Silk Road founder"

BS. The address they mention is publicly known to be controlled by Dustin Trammel (http://blog.dustintrammell.com/2013/11/26/i-am-not-satoshi/)

Very poor investigation by Ron and Shamir, they lost all the respect I had for them.



1265. Post 3738022 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: herzmeister on November 27, 2013, 03:50:01 PM
be fearful when others are greedy !!!1!  Angry

Greed will just start now that we passed $1,000. Until now, mainstream is fearful (it is a bubble, it is a ponzi, is super-risky, etc.)

When "pro" financial advisors will start to shout "get in, is the best investment ever", etc. - then it's time to be fearful and cash out.



1266. Post 3738687 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 27, 2013, 04:13:04 PM
We're not in the clear yet; we're still over 1k yuan away from the CNY high from earlier this month.

I'm delaying my celebration  Cool

Still celebrating LTC and NMC tho ;-)

+1 on LTC although I'm also celebrating XRP.  Woot!  Sup Rampion!   Grin

I win a lot with my BTC but I steel feel bad because I sold 300 LTC at 0.008 per BTC (I manage to catch the exact bottom, weee).

Please tell me LTC will go down.

Sorry, LTC gonna break $100 by years end.

Celebrating XRP? It was at 6,000-9,000 XRP's per BTC when we discussed it in Summer. I know by heart because I bought Ripples as an "hedge" against Bitcoin, I still have a few hundred k's of cRipples BTW. I never look at the exchange rate anymore because I get depressed when I see it (last time I checked I was losing +85% of the BTC invested in XRP) but honestly I consider the BTC I threw at it "lost" (and in dollars now that's a helthy 5 figures investment), I will keep those useless hundreds of k's of cRipples in case BTC finally goes to 0 and cRipple still exists - that's the ultimate purpose of an "hedge".

About LTC: it's extremely unlikely it will break $100 by years end. I give it 10% chance to do that. Will see.



1267. Post 3738695 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 27, 2013, 04:41:23 PM
Now the real media bubble forms.  5 figures and then drop?

At 5 figures I can cash out and retire for good, so be it Wink



1268. Post 3738724 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Patel on November 27, 2013, 04:43:38 PM
I am extremely jealous at the ltc/btc ratio right now. wtf how is ltc becoming stronger against bitcoin?

It's called pump&dump.



1269. Post 3738789 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 27, 2013, 04:45:33 PM
We're not in the clear yet; we're still over 1k yuan away from the CNY high from earlier this month.

I'm delaying my celebration  Cool

Still celebrating LTC and NMC tho ;-)

+1 on LTC although I'm also celebrating XRP.  Woot!  Sup Rampion!   Grin

I win a lot with my BTC but I steel feel bad because I sold 300 LTC at 0.008 per BTC (I manage to catch the exact bottom, weee).

Please tell me LTC will go down.

Sorry, LTC gonna break $100 by years end.

Celebrating XRP? It was at 6,000-9,000 XRP's per BTC when we discussed it in Summer. I know by heart because I bought Ripples as an "hedge" against Bitcoin, I still have a few hundred k's of cRipples BTW. I never look at the exchange rate anymore because I get depressed when I see it (last time I checked I was losing +85% of the BTC invested in XRP) but honestly I consider the BTC I threw at it "lost" (and in dollars now that's a helthy 5 figures investment), I will keep those useless hundreds of k's of cRipples in case BTC finally goes to 0 and cRipple still exists - that's the ultimate purpose of an "hedge".

About LTC: it's extremely unlikely it will break $100 by years end. I give it 10% chance to do that. Will see.


Bro, are you math challenged?   Huh   You might wanna try looking at XRP/USD.   Do you remember the price of BTC in summer?  Do you know the price of BTC now?  Ok, that should clear it up for you.  Roll Eyes XRP has smashed it's previous records.  

I actually think LTC will test the 25% of BTC theory but was saying $100 to be safe.   Grin

Honestly, I don't give shit about XRP/USD. I invested BTC in it (precisely as an hedge), and I just care about XRP/BTC.



1270. Post 3738813 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 27, 2013, 04:49:12 PM
Fiat leaks slowing EVEN MORE money coming in 10,000 BTC an hour in money coming in.

It hit close on 7000 just before the 1000 mark and it's accelerating.

There will be no pulling back you, we will seriously overshoot 1000 IMO  

hah!

For every coming in, there is as much going out.

You do know that once Bitstamp (where the US is cashing out) breaks $1,000 there will be almost no resistance till $10,000 - right?



1271. Post 3738900 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 27, 2013, 04:52:01 PM

Honestly, I don't give shit about XRP/USD. I invested BTC in it (precisely as an hedge), and I just care about XRP/BTC.

How can I put this politely...um...you're a moron. SMH Grin

Yep, a moron that bought a full truck loaded of coins while you were saying that it was going straight down to 0 and that it would never succeed.

Now don't try to be the smart one and admit you got it totally wrong - you actually fucked up big time.



1272. Post 3738917 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 27, 2013, 04:57:48 PM
Now the real media bubble forms.  5 figures and then drop?

At 5 figures I can cash out and retire for good, so be it Wink

This is wrong, you're not doing it right.

Cashing out to fiat, you will lose money.

Bitcoin is MONEY, its a store of wealth. Ppl can have their retirement saving in bitcoins and spend it as they needed.

Understand the technology and you can appreciate to be early adopter.


I never said I would go "full fiat". I will never go full fiat, that's against my religion Wink. But at 5 figures I could cash out 30-50% of my stash and never ever worry again about money, regardless of what happens after that.



1273. Post 3739029 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 27, 2013, 05:01:57 PM
Now the real media bubble forms.  5 figures and then drop?

At 5 figures I can cash out and retire for good, so be it Wink

This is wrong, you're not doing it right.

Cashing out to fiat, you will lose money.

Bitcoin is MONEY, its a store of wealth. Ppl can have their retirement saving in bitcoins and spend it as they needed.

Understand the technology and you can appreciate to be early adopter.


I never said I would go "full fiat". I will never go full fiat, that's against my religion Wink. But at 5 figures I could cash out 30-50% of my stash and never ever worry again about money, regardless of what happens after that.

No then you didnt mean "cashing out" (lol the term is "cash out" for god's sake)

You meant, "SPEND" 30-40% .....Which i hope on value asset such as real estate, and goods to enjoy life.


I accept that, I didn't express myself correctly.

I will spend that precisely on goods to enjoy life, and probably real estate.



1274. Post 3739080 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on November 27, 2013, 05:06:25 PM

Honestly, I don't give shit about XRP/USD. I invested BTC in it (precisely as an hedge), and I just care about XRP/BTC.

How can I put this politely...um...you're a moron. SMH Grin

Yep, a moron that bought a full truck loaded of coins while you were saying that it was going straight down to 0 and that it would never succeed.

Now don't try to be the smart one and admit you got it totally wrong - you actually fucked up big time.

Bro, if you bought XRP in summertime, you're in the black.  It's not my fault you can't do simple math.  And I hold BTC, as you've been told so I'm celebrating on multiple fronts.  Woot woot, beeotch!

I'm not in the black. I bought XRP at 6k - 9k per BTC. I don't know what's the current exchange rate (and I really don't care), but last time I checked it was something like 60k per BTC. That's not being in the black, that's being very deep in the red, regardless of the overall USD value.



1275. Post 3739108 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: tbcoin on November 27, 2013, 05:12:55 PM
bitstamp ppl really want stop this...

Those are the US folks willing to cash out. Right now Gox is where the big money that wants in is - just watch the news, all the financial media quote the Gox price, and there is were the big boys go - to buy BTC, not Goxbux. On the contrary, the US guys that want out go to Bitstamp, there's no other choice apart from OTC.

When the $1k barrier is broken on Stamp all the hell will break loose.



1276. Post 3739267 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: zoinky on November 27, 2013, 05:22:20 PM
bitstamp ppl really want stop this...

Those are the US folks willing to cash out. Right now Gox is where the big money that wants in is - just watch the news, all the financial media quote the Gox price, and there is were the big boys go - to buy BTC, not Goxbux. On the contrary, the US guys that want out go to Bitstamp, there's no other choice apart from OTC.

When the $1k barrier is broken on Stamp all the hell will break loose.

What about Coinbase?

I thought there were limits at coinbase - can you sell 1,000 coins on Coinbase?



1277. Post 3739404 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.29h):

Quote from: smiley123 on November 27, 2013, 05:32:33 PM
bitstamp ppl really want stop this...

Those are the US folks willing to cash out. Right now Gox is where the big money that wants in is - just watch the news, all the financial media quote the Gox price, and there is were the big boys go - to buy BTC, not Goxbux. On the contrary, the US guys that want out go to Bitstamp, there's no other choice apart from OTC.

When the $1k barrier is broken on Stamp all the hell will break loose.

What about Coinbase?

I thought there were limits at coinbase - can you sell 1,000 coins on Coinbase?
From coinbase you can buy or sell 50 coins a day with like 4-5 business days delay.  You can purchase 10 coins a week instant.

So its not an option for "cashing out" for someone with a medium-sized chunk of coins. Do not forget that most of those "cashing out" now bought coins in the single or low double digits.



1278. Post 3740315 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 27, 2013, 06:42:06 PM
Media exposure is huge this time.

Big indeed. This time we go mainstream for real, baby.

5 digits by next year.



1279. Post 3740354 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on November 27, 2013, 06:44:03 PM
Almost everyone is a bull here, even during a megadump like this one.... uhm...


Being bearish right now is almost equal to being a retarded. The price recovered after a 50% crash (900-450) and we just had a nice consolidation phase in which the bid side was replenished and the confidence restored.

In the meanwhile, the Senate legitimates BTC and the media exposure is huge. Big money wants in. Billionaires are coming.

And pigs are slaughtered, and weak hands shaken off.



1280. Post 3740430 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: humanitee on November 27, 2013, 06:47:35 PM
Media exposure is huge this time.

Big indeed. This time we go mainstream for real, baby.

5 digits by next year.

I can't tell if you are trolling, really.

I would have thought the same thing about $1000 this year at the end of last.

Last year price was $12. Going to $1,000 meant a 100x increase.

Going to 5 digits now is only a 10x jump. Of course stakes are different and much more money is needed to support that price, but you do all realize that no big company has yet invested seriously into Bitcoin, do you? It's just a few private investors and a few dozen millions from "avant garde" venture capitalists.

2014 might very well be the year in which the bigger boys start throwing serious money at BTC.



1281. Post 3740616 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on November 27, 2013, 06:56:31 PM
As "by next year" that sounded like by Jan 1st 2014.

Sorry English is not my first language. I meant 5 digits in 2014.



1282. Post 3741297 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: yefi on November 27, 2013, 07:16:48 PM
Almost everyone is a bull here, even during a megadump like this one.... uhm...


Being bearish right now is almost equal to being a retarded. The price recovered after a 50% crash (900-450) and we just had a nice consolidation phase in which the bid side was replenished and the confidence restored.

In the meanwhile, the Senate legitimates BTC and the media exposure is huge. Big money wants in. Billionaires are coming.

And pigs are slaughtered, and weak hands shaken off.
Yep, the stage looks set for another massive rise. I originally called $1700 on this, but I'm beginning to think I was being too conservative. Cheesy

My first call was $2300, but I guess its an out-of-my-ass kind of figure. It really depends on how it behaves. Its clear to me that the fastest it grows (going double exponential, then parabolic) the sooner it crashes. So guessing a top at this stage is sheer luck, everything depends on price action.



1283. Post 3741428 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: CalibrataBG on November 27, 2013, 07:59:15 PM
Did someone try to create a dip by selling hard at Gox an hour ago? Welllll sure didn't work, we're back on the uphill slope! Private jet, here I come...

Some noobs panic sold and loaded and their kind bought a lot of cheap coins from their shaky hands.

In any case their mission is accomplished. You won't believe how many tards bought just above $1k to then panic sell at $950. People that is investing more than they can afford to lose; people that does not understand that given BTC 's potential holding is superior to day trading; wishful thinkers that believe that they will be able to do a1% daily profit by buying and selling Bitcoin every day. Summing up: the bulls make money, the bears make money, the exchanges make money... and pigs are slaughtered.



1284. Post 3741607 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: spazcoin on November 27, 2013, 08:17:42 PM
Wow, someone has put $190k into a $950/BTC buy wall on CampBx.

Get used to it. To sustain the current price we will need to see much more $$ on the bid side.



1285. Post 3741662 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Syke on November 27, 2013, 08:23:36 PM
You don't see too many posts gloating about they sold at the top and rebought at the bottom.

Trading fees really eat into your profits when taking advantage of small swings, so you gotta wait for the bigger swings. I sold at 1035 and rebought at 930. Btcchina's no-fee trading sure looks attractive.

And what is BTCCHina's business model? How do they generate revenue?



1286. Post 3741822 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 27, 2013, 08:29:50 PM
You don't see too many posts gloating about they sold at the top and rebought at the bottom.

Trading fees really eat into your profits when taking advantage of small swings, so you gotta wait for the bigger swings. I sold at 1035 and rebought at 930. Btcchina's no-fee trading sure looks attractive.

And what is BTCCHina's business model? How do they generate revenue?

I think they dont looking into profit right now. Its a smart move because they need to gain trust as well as testing their setup.

Mark did test his system while taking profits from us..... have you ever been goxxed? lol


I'd be quite uncomfortable with an exchange charging 0 fees if there isn't a clear plan/alternative revenue stream. I think everybody should work for profit, and a company managing millions of $$$ per day doing it for free seems fishy to me. Especially considering that there is not much choice for Chinese, its not like the market is super mature and bloated with reliable options and you need to work for free to gain user base.

You may be right, but I prefer to trust my hard earned money to companies with a clear business model, and that have a big incentive in NOT scamming customers.



1287. Post 3750259 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: kehtolo on November 28, 2013, 11:12:18 AM
The real madness will start once Bitstamp hits $1000. $1000 will seem cheap next week.

That will happen today i think. Possibly very soon.

Someone wants to cash out $3M on Stamp at exactly $1k. Any whale wants to exchange a few of his millions for a 3 thousand BTC?

I guess its fun when you request a $3M withdrawal on Stamp. I can imagine the face of your bank manager when that wire arrives, especially if you never had a balance greater than a few k's  Cheesy Cheesy



1288. Post 3750325 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 18, 2013, 06:25:26 AM
No more triple digits for 2013.

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 12, 2013, 02:57:14 PM
Goodbye, triple digits. See you 2015.

Quote from: Blitz­ on July 18, 2013, 07:12:45 AM
Noone buys the triple digit lie anymore.

Hell yeah. You were right from the very beginning.

Godspeed to you my friend!



1289. Post 3750359 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 28, 2013, 11:18:35 AM
The real madness will start once Bitstamp hits $1000. $1000 will seem cheap next week.

That will happen today i think. Possibly very soon.

Someone wants to cash out $3M on Stamp at exactly $1k. Any whale wants to exchange a few of his millions for a 3 thousand BTC?

I guess its fun when you request a $3M withdrawal on Stamp. I can imagine the face of your bank manager when that wire arrives, especially if you never had a balance greater than a few k's  Cheesy Cheesy

Haha, so much fun to show your bank statement to people close to you if they have no idea. Probably stupid though Smiley

Anyhow, moving 7 figures of fiat is not easy unless you have already moved similar amounts in the past. From one side, I'm not so sure Bitstamp can move 7 figures quickly (Gox certainly not, as they have 500k monthly limit plus all kind of delays). From the other side, even if the exchange is able to wire you such amount in one piece (and i doubt it), if you are a "regular joe" that lives month-by-month and never had seen that amount of cash in your balance you can be sure that you will get a lot question from your bank manager before they even try to credit the money to your account.



1290. Post 3750568 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: macsga on November 28, 2013, 11:39:17 AM
Nobody -read again- NOBODY who owns a 3 or 4 digit amount of BTCs is selling nowadays. It's all what they were looking for and patiently waiting, all this time. It will simply won't happen (unless they want to convince some weak hands to sell their stash to them in panic sells)... Wink



Well, you have somebody selling 3k coins at $1k on Stamp Cheesy

Do not forget that there are quite a lot +3k BTC holders that mined back in 2010, 2011 and 2012, and that never in their lives have seen more thant $50k at the same time. The sensible thing to do for those guys is to sell 1k coins and bring home their first million. They won't be "all set for life", but their life will VASTLY improve for the years to come.

You see, money has a marginal utility once you reach a certain spot. Securing the first million is much more important than making the second one. Sensible guys know this.



1291. Post 3750888 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

China is heading to ATH too.

Brace yourselves. The biggest bubble EVER is coming. And this is just the beginning.



1292. Post 3750949 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 28, 2013, 12:11:15 PM
This is the wrong thread. But 'gosh dang', what the hell is up with altcoins? My where worth aprox. 0.3 BTC three days ago, now they are closing in to 2.5 BTC!

Speculative bubble driven by big players. It's happened before. Look at he volume.

Congrats for holding so long, but get out before it implodes.

LOOOOL, surf the forums, you are just saying the same thing some stupid things that were repeated over and over when we hit $22 at the end of January 2013.

It will at least double again before crashing. And it might very well implode for good at some point, but not before 5 figures.

Mark my words.



1293. Post 3750978 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Vycid on November 28, 2013, 12:17:07 PM
This is the wrong thread. But 'gosh dang', what the hell is up with altcoins? My where worth aprox. 0.3 BTC three days ago, now they are closing in to 2.5 BTC!

Speculative bubble driven by big players. It's happened before. Look at he volume.

Congrats for holding so long, but get out before it implodes.

LOOOOL, surf the forums, you are just saying the same thing some stupid things that were repeated over and over when we hit $22 at the end of January 2013.

It will at least double again before crashing. And it might very well implode for good at some point, but not before 5 figures.

Mark my words.

ALTCOINS.

Chill your titties.

OK, didn't read that through.



1294. Post 3751011 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: nesevis on November 28, 2013, 12:19:28 PM
This is the wrong thread. But 'gosh dang', what the hell is up with altcoins? My where worth aprox. 0.3 BTC three days ago, now they are closing in to 2.5 BTC!

Speculative bubble driven by big players. It's happened before. Look at he volume.

Congrats for holding so long, but get out before it implodes.

LOOOOL, surf the forums, you are just saying the same thing some stupid things that were repeated over and over when we hit $22 at the end of January 2013.

It will at least double again before crashing. And it might very well implode for good at some point, but not before 5 figures.

Mark my words.

Who to believe..? I think I'll just hold on for now. It worked well for my bitcoins Smiley

I thought you were speaking about BTC, not alts - I'd say that this is not a bad moment to dump LTC and NMC (don't even know about the others, the only one which is semi-interesting to me is PPC).



1295. Post 3751237 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: bnjmnkent on November 28, 2013, 12:39:01 PM
I just woke up, now I am confused...
Bearstamp broke through, gox communicates https://www.mtgox.com/press_release_20131120.html.

What happened?

I guess the next stop is Mars?

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1296. Post 3751535 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on November 28, 2013, 12:48:12 PM
LOOOOL, surf the forums, you are just saying the same thing some stupid things that were repeated over and over when we hit $22 at the end of January 2013.

It will at least double again before crashing. And it might very well implode for good at some point, but not before 5 figures.

Mark my words.

I have no option here but to concede the fact that ignorance towards you has cost me at least 10btc. I'm buying in now and will sit tight for the rest of the ride.

Always nice to hear when bears turn to bulls. Congrats! Cheesy

I think he finally found out that we won't go to 50 before we can go up.
Some people are just a bit slow.
But good to see he's ok now.

Shroomsy. We indeed WENT to $50 before we resumed the uptrend. But OK, after it went to $50 and it stabilized at aprox. $135 I said it had to go down again to $50 (or lower) before it went up again...

It's obvious it never went down again to $50 from that point ($135) - but indeed went down to $67. So yes, I was not able to "predict" the precise bottom - but the price indeed lost 50% of its value before the trendline was resumed. That was my general point, and additionaly I wrote that kind of behavior was absolutely normal and in fact, healthy. On the contrary, you wrote many times that the price going down was "hurting the coin". You will remember that we mocked up you quite a lot for repeating continuosly "it hurts the coin". 

At the end the price went down, the coin was not hurt at all and its skyrocketing again - so why so bitter my friend?



1297. Post 3754006 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Drabla on November 28, 2013, 04:16:53 PM
WoW, german radio (SWR3) bashing bitcoin:


- Not legitimate
- Not backed by anything
- Could be gone in a year
- Do not invest into Btc
- Keep your children away from it!!

Good. This is bullish.

"Be greedy when others are fearful"...



1298. Post 3754224 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: Nemesis on November 28, 2013, 04:30:05 PM
Can you see the headlines

"Bitcoins worth more than GOLD!"

Eek!

What does Peter Schiff say?  Grin

Expect another big stream of headlines as BTC blasts through gold's price.

After the one ounce of gold mark, we'll have to look at the 1kg mark  Grin

I suck at math, how much is 1kg of GOLD ?  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

$40k



1299. Post 3759304 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: barbs on November 28, 2013, 11:51:10 PM
I think this is a hookup, cash for everyone, coins for everyone, happy thanksgiving ??

No. If somebody wins somebody has to lose.



1300. Post 3764217 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.30h):

Quote from: rpietila on November 29, 2013, 09:11:11 AM
There is also the chance they bought their own walls to induce momentum.

Anyone with more bitcoins than 1,000 is cautious of the rise, and scheming to keep the price in check to solidify their own position in the real world. (Anyone with <1,000 coins does not have walls)

This is funny. When I started to trade actively (January this year) a "wall" was +20k coins. Now 500 coins is considered a "wall". When and if we hit 5 figures, 50 BTC will be considered a "wall". Funny indeed Smiley



1301. Post 3783143 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: Odrec on November 30, 2013, 05:43:35 PM
Why didn't BTC rose $400 in two days? am I supposed to wait to become rich??? what is this!?!? *outraged*

This just means that the top is not yet around the corner. The faster it grows, the sooner it crashes.



1302. Post 3792282 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

A little reminder to all the newcomers about what happens when you sell on weekends: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4axmD2YvPnA

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1303. Post 3795016 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Sheep marketplace turned out to be a scam, operator is now desperately tumbling at least 96k BTC.

http://www.reddit.com/r/SheepMarketplace/comments/1rvlft/i_just_chased_him_through_a_bitcoin_tumbler_and/

http://www.reddit.com/r/SheepMarketplace/comments/1ru5ir/founda_wallet_containing_98million_worth_of_coins/




1304. Post 3813719 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

Quote from: niothor on December 03, 2013, 11:34:55 PM
The best course of action for the guy is to extort Bitcoins from you guys on a bitcoin related tor site by means of a signed message saying: Send me more coins or I will dump. Grin

This almost makes me send a Satoshi with the message: "Dump Moth*** , Dump If you have the balls"

Do it:)

Now seriously: if he wants to dump, he still needs to do it in an orderly fashion. In summer 2011 somebody dumped hundred of k's of BTC and took the price to $0.01 (a forum user bought like 270k BTC for $3k), and Gox just halted trading and "rolled back". If something like that happens (hundred of k's dumped) the exchange would just stop the activity as they would assume that something fishy is going on.



1305. Post 3827164 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.31h):

I love how nothing is considered off topic in this thread, from random trolling to serious debate, there are times in which "wall observing" is just noise

Cheesy



1306. Post 3832516 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

So, did we have a double top?



1307. Post 3832961 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Shermo on December 05, 2013, 08:51:53 AM
I don't even understand why this is taken as bad news, its just neutral. Banks can't trade in bitcoins or take out insurance against them, hardly surprising. Individuals can do what they want but they accept the risk.

This is no change to how the rest of the world is working with Bitcoins. I'm surprised if any Chinese banks have invested in Bitcoins heavily anyway.

Nobody takes this as bad news. Speculators are just selling to buy back lower.



1308. Post 3833140 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: NamelessOne on December 05, 2013, 09:32:25 AM
People are still panicking over 57000 BTC coming to exchanges ? waiting for the 3-6 confirmations, this means the price could crash even more


These people could also very well calm down, read the news fully and formulate their reaction after seeing the initial sell off. Most of these people don't want to sell at the bottom either so there are no guarantees right now.

How do you know that money is going to the exchange?  The "total sent" is pretty low for the last days standards.



1309. Post 3833165 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 05, 2013, 09:35:23 AM
People are still panicking over 57000 BTC coming to exchanges ? waiting for the 3-6 confirmations, this means the price could crash even more


These people could also very well calm down, read the news fully and formulate their reaction after seeing the initial sell off. Most of these people don't want to sell at the bottom either so there are no guarantees right now.

How do you know that money is going to the exchange?  The "total sent" is pretty low for the last days standards.

Isn't there some tool trying to launder 96k BTC right now?

Exactly. In fact the "total sent" has been insanely high for the last couple of weeks.



1310. Post 3833193 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

I love the sound of weak hands shaken out.

Really. I love it.



1311. Post 3833463 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: 600watt on December 05, 2013, 09:58:06 AM
wow, how deeeeeeeep can it go   ? Grin

Wouldn't mind to see $350 coins Cheesy



1312. Post 3833476 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: maz on December 05, 2013, 10:01:54 AM
Lol Chinese are pushing back ^^ Over 1030 in Price atm

Those are the ones that havnt read the news yet. Wait til they find out bitcoin is useless in their country.

Good. Let's shake out all those who did not understand what's BTC real role and purpose, and that BTC is resilient to any kind of ban.

Satoshi choose to be anonymous for a reason.



1313. Post 3833810 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: John999 on December 05, 2013, 10:12:21 AM
The worst case scenario is not a drop in the low 2-300s, it is that we might enter a painful multi year bear market.

Lol at the drama at $300s - why would be so bad for the price to stabilize a 300% higher than it was in mid october, and a 2500% higher than it was on January 2013?

2500% yearly growth seems a good investment to me.



1314. Post 3833846 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: macsga on December 05, 2013, 10:34:50 AM
Am I counting wrong? Were there 25K Bitcoins in one sell?  Grin

Not sheep money, I hope?

Hmmm, that's actually a really important thought. Anyone?
Not according to this... Wink
https://blockchain.info/address/1CbR8da9YPZqXJJKm9ze1GYf67eKAUfXwP

That's BTC-E wallet.



1315. Post 3833913 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on December 05, 2013, 10:40:41 AM
My understanding is that now China government clarified their policy towards bitcoin:

1) Bitcoin is a virtual commodity. It's not a currency so it cannot be used as a currency.
2) Bitcoin exchanges have to take some measures to verify users' identities and avoid money laundering.
3) Avoid using 'virtual currency' in the media to avoid misleading investors.

Actually it is not a bad news. Bitcoin has never been used as a currency in China (except two attempts did by a branch of Baidu and China Jiangsu Mobicomm). People buy them mainly for speculation and transferring funds to overseas.

Previously people may worry about the legality of bitcoin exchanges. Now this notice actually almost officially announces that all bitcoin exchanges following the rules will be legal.

This plays right into the Chinese government's long-term dollar divestment scheme. They are encouraging citizens to hold gold, so they will do the same with Bitcoin. They just want to make it more like a store of value, which in my opinion is exactly the right approach. China got strategy.

Exactly. Bulls and bears will make money over this, pigs will be slaughtered and weak hands shaken out.



1316. Post 3834099 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: gandhibt on December 05, 2013, 10:50:05 AM
How much was dumped?

aprox: 30k on Gox, 27k on Stamp, 50k on BTChina

just around $100MM only on those three exchanges Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

...pigs getting slaughtered



1317. Post 3834806 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: maz on December 05, 2013, 12:04:34 PM
This is just getting started guys, stop suffering from myopia.

When I step back, by 20/20 vision sees triangles forming. Are you suggesting that they should see the price dropping further?

Yes, I'd say theres a relatively small percentage of the bitcoin world actually seen this crash and news so far. Lets even say 50%. When they log on and see their purchases at 1050+ are now sub 1000, there could be even larger sell off's.

But the news has already updated to say it's not such bad news. With that, I can't see latecomers panic selling when the charts also look like they might be bottoming.

Dude stop reading what some bull manipulates the news to say as fact. It's bad news full stop. China's banning financial institutions from handling bitcoin transactions, if you see that as good news for Chinese exchanges or for bitcoin in China alone, your deluded.

"At this stage, all financial institutions and payment institutions" - http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1s5hzl/my_human_translation_of_the_china_regulation/

Do you actually inform yourself before posting? I take this as "We'll first check how we can tax the shit out of this"

The important thing is that the Chinese government have eventually 'showed their hand', which we have all been waiting for. And it's not good news.

Don't know if you are:

1) a troll
2) a pig getting slaughtered (A.K.A. "a retard")
3) a noob trying to talk down the price down so he can load the truck with cheap coins

Please advise.



1318. Post 3835045 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: niothor on December 05, 2013, 12:09:48 PM

Don't know if you are:

1) a troll
2) a pig getting slaughtered (A.K.A. "a retard")
3) a noob trying to talk down the price down so he can load the truck with cheap coins

Please advise.

How much fiat/bitcoins % you in right now?

Depends on how you look at it. I'm not trading unless we enter a bear market, so in one sense I'm "100% in". On the other side, I recently converted 10% of my stash in fiat profits, but with the intention to spend it - not to buy back... Unless we enter a bear market and we revisit $300.



1319. Post 3835057 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: ajax3592 on December 05, 2013, 12:17:57 PM
Brace yourselves market gonna crash. Two reasons -

#1 China banned banks from Bitcoin transactions

#2 Sheep Market place theft of $400 million, much bigger than silk road


How did you get by that number?  Weren't 95000 coins?

Check this transaction
https://blockchain.info/address/1CbR8da9YPZqXJJKm9ze1GYf67eKAUfXwP?offset=0&filter=0

That's BTC-E wallet.



1320. Post 3835326 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Quote from: tarmi on December 05, 2013, 12:47:34 PM
Brace yourselves market gonna crash. Two reasons -

#1 China banned banks from Bitcoin transactions

#2 Sheep Market place theft of $400 million, much bigger than silk road


How did you get by that number?  Weren't 95000 coins?

Check this transaction
https://blockchain.info/address/1CbR8da9YPZqXJJKm9ze1GYf67eKAUfXwP?offset=0&filter=0

That's BTC-E wallet.

says who?

Say those that have traded on BTC-E and have followed their coins in the blockchain.

Plus, that address has been part of the "top 100" balance addresses for long.

Plus: http://www.reddit.com/r/SheepMarketplace/comments/1s2upf/the_sheep_market_scam_address_does_not_actually/



1321. Post 3849033 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.32h):

Bearish signals everywhere: technicals looking bearish, contrary indicators like rpietila and coinseeker just turned bulls, I'm starting to feel this rally is in serious danger.

Well, if we enter a bear market we will enjoy the cheap coins.



1322. Post 3854595 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Prepare for cheap coins



1323. Post 3854981 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Bitcoin is such a wonderful thing.

If it goes up, it makes you happy because you see your wealth growing by the minute.

If it goes down, it makes you happy because you can buy more of it.

Probably the best thing in the world Wink



1324. Post 3855182 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

If we enter a bear market i bet it will be shorter than ever.

The run-up took just one month and a half, half of what we have seen from February to April.

I see the boom and bust cycles been shorter and more contained.



1325. Post 3855249 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Cheap coins for everybody, let's see how the panickers sell at a loss, hopefully they can take us well below $400...

Wouldn't mind three months of bear market



1326. Post 3855284 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 06, 2013, 08:17:40 PM
If we enter a bear market i bet it will be shorter than ever.

The run-up took just one month and a half, half of what we have seen from February to April.

I see the boom and bust cycles been shorter and more contained.

I tend to agree, although I think it's going to be longer then a couple hours or couple days bear market though. The run up was so china focused that we're going to really need some strong good news either form there or elsewhere to pop us out of a bear market with any speed. Otherwise, it's back to growing normally but at a slower pace.

I think 3 month bear market would fit the pattern.



1327. Post 3855351 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: John999 on December 06, 2013, 08:21:01 PM
Cheap coins for everybody, let's see how the panickers sell at a loss, hopefully they can take us well below $400...

Would mind three months of bear market

what about 2 years?

I don't see how we could have 2 years of beat market. It doesn't fit the previous cycles, the duration of the bear market is related with the duration of the run up.

Plus, there's no way BTC fades away for two years unless something disruptive happens, and by disruptive I mean something that takes it to 0.

There is too much attention. Too much awareness. Too many product and services in term of infrastructure aiming to give liquidity to the market.



1328. Post 3855557 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: John999 on December 06, 2013, 08:27:12 PM
If we enter a bear market i bet it will be shorter than ever.

The run-up took just one month and a half, half of what we have seen from February to April.

I see the boom and bust cycles been shorter and more contained.

I tend to agree, although I think it's going to be longer then a couple hours or couple days bear market though. The run up was so china focused that we're going to really need some strong good news either form there or elsewhere to pop us out of a bear market with any speed. Otherwise, it's back to growing normally but at a slower pace.

I think 3 month bear market would fit the pattern.

The bubble was too big, it's going to take much much much more time to recover (if it does).

Too big?

2011: $0.8 to $32
2013 (1): $12 to $266
2013 (2): $130 to $1242

The bubbles get smaller and smaller, and so the deflation of the pops. Plus, big money wants in. We are reaching the tipping point. There's global awareness. People won't forget about Bitcoin anytime soon, I LOL hard at those predicting a multi-year bear market.



1329. Post 3858049 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 06, 2013, 09:40:14 PM
so 850 is the new floor imo.

We saw total panic tonight and yet once we approached 850 buyers started perking up.

LOL approached 850?

Don't you mean after we got spat out of a gox failsafe loop for an hour which blocked any trading below $829? It's worth noting ever other exchange sat frozen for half an hour waiting for gox to take the lead again before making any moves back up.

poeple were trading........

It completely killed the momentum of the dip, who knows where gox would have stopped, it was certainly headed for 700.

but the deeper it falls the harder its bounces back.

stop thinking of what could have been.

How many times does Bitstamp need to bounce from 0.800 before people realize it's the new floor?  Roll Eyes Every bounce (3 so far) adds to the strength of the support, and it is already in the Titanium level, comparable to molecular's left nut.

Buying at 0.800 is better EV than buying at 1.000. From 1 it can go either way, but from 0.800 it always goes up, and the 10% probability not included in "always" is only that it will dip to 0.6 for a few hours. Nothing to be scared of.



Bad Mojo. This just means we will be below $800 very soon.

Please Risto turn bear again.



1330. Post 3858156 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: maz on December 07, 2013, 12:20:03 AM
Breaking news: Officials arrest BTCChina founder Bobby Lee!

.... not yet

I love these times. Cheesy

I knew it was FUD right away, because in China, you don't get arrested. You disappear.

You are pushing hard to get the "retard of the year prize"

Why don't you put your money where your mouth is? Are you shorting?

For the record: I'm not selling a single coin yet. Fresh fiat waiting at $400, but it might be wishful thinking. 2013 is no 2011.



1331. Post 3858417 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: maz on December 07, 2013, 12:30:19 AM
Breaking news: Officials arrest BTCChina founder Bobby Lee!

.... not yet

I love these times. Cheesy

I knew it was FUD right away, because in China, you don't get arrested. You disappear.

You are pushing hard to get the "retard of the year prize"

Why don't you put your money where your mouth is? Are you shorting?

For the record: I'm not selling a single coin yet. Fresh fiat waiting at $400, but it might be wishful thinking. 2013 is no 2011.

lol wtf? retard of the year, money where my mouth is? you get out of the wrong side of the bed?

My fiat landed late November, I've ignored this whole run up to 1200+ waiting for the come down on the other side, I'm five figures in fiat watching the price go to the moon and back with the constitution of a lion. Also, I'm not here to prove anything to you. I'm here to invest my limited savings with the highest returns I can, for the benefit of me and my wives future. If you wanna put shit where your mouth is, go find someone else.

OK, so you are just desperately trying to talk the price down to be able to catch the BTC train as low as possible.... And probably when you finally buy in you will try to talk the price up in a similar fashion - with shallow retardness.

If you are so sure everything is so bearish why don't you short? Plus500 offers you 1:5 leverage, go ahead, you will make a truck full of money. No? Then you just want cheap coins, as everyone else, but you want them harder because you are full fiat and kinda butthurt cause u missed the run up from $0.05 to $1242.

Just remember to invest only what you can afford to lose.



1332. Post 3858472 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Come on guys, sell. My bid at $400 is waiting for your coins.



1333. Post 3858662 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: maz on December 07, 2013, 01:04:25 AM
OK, so you are just desperately trying to talk the price down to be able to catch the BTC train as low as possible.... And probably when you finally buy in you will try to talk the price up in a similar fashion - with shallow retardness.

If you are so sure everything is so bearish why don't you short? Plus500 offers you 1:5 leverage, go ahead, you will make a truck full of money. No? Then you just want cheap coins, as everyone else, but you want them harder because you are full fiat and kinda butthurt cause u missed the run up from $0.05 to $1242.

Just remember to invest only what you can afford to lose.

My first call was $2300, but I guess its an out-of-my-ass kind of figure. It really depends on how it behaves. Its clear to me that the fastest it grows (going double exponential, then parabolic) the sooner it crashes. So guessing a top at this stage is sheer luck, everything depends on price action.

So, it's ok for you to pull figures out your ass and talk the price up? but as soon as some one does the opposite their a retard? Why don't I short? Because I view shorting as gambling and I'm not gambling with my savings.

Ok so I want cheap coins, why don't you try and find someone else on the forum who doesn't want cheap coins? I've read most of your posts during the run up, your a typical bull, you have so much shit to say when the price is going up, but now we're looking at it going down your just negative, you don't know what to say actually, your just mumbling. Maybe take a break dude, get away from the computer clear your mind.

I don't see how the comment you quoted is "talking the price up". And btw, I don't need to talk the price up because it already went up by +60x in less than or year Cheesy

Plus, I strongly believe that nobody is able to manipulate the price by posting in here, believing otherwise = delusions of grandeur.

BTC's infrastructure is fragile and the asset itself is extremely volatile. The market depth is still a joke. Just a big sell off turns a bull market into a bear market, and the opposite its also true. If you enjoy the cheap coins like everybody else you can cheer them, but by trying to spread retarded FUD you are just making a fool of yourself.

BTC is a gamble in itself, and a big one - does "experimental software still in beta" ring a bell? The moment it's not a gamble any more, probably is the right moment to sell a big part of your stash.



1334. Post 3858850 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: Rampion on December 07, 2013, 12:13:07 AM

How many times does Bitstamp need to bounce from 0.800 before people realize it's the new floor?  Roll Eyes Every bounce (3 so far) adds to the strength of the support, and it is already in the Titanium level, comparable to molecular's left nut.

Buying at 0.800 is better EV than buying at 1.000. From 1 it can go either way, but from 0.800 it always goes up, and the 10% probability not included in "always" is only that it will dip to 0.6 for a few hours. Nothing to be scared of.



Bad Mojo. This just means we will be below $800 very soon.

Please Risto turn bear again.

A bit of bearishness from your side could help us, Risto!

Seriously: the market is very thin. We can go well below $600 with just a few sell offs, in fact I hope to visit $400. In any case the fundamentals are stronger than ever, and the level of awareness is very high. Bitcoin won't be trading below $1000 for long. If we enter a bear market, it will be shorter than ever before,



1335. Post 3858893 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: Hfertig on December 07, 2013, 01:42:02 AM
I am not going to put an order in above USD 200...

Good luck. I hope you already have a bunch of them at least



1336. Post 3858902 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: tHash on December 07, 2013, 01:43:51 AM
I am not going to put an order in above USD 200...

Lower than the previous ATH?   Yeah, that has happened before.  Roll Eyes

Yep, in his dreams.



1337. Post 3858995 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Lol at the guy with a 1200 BTC ask wall at $756 on stamp

I bet he will panic and dump in about ten minutes Cheesy



1338. Post 3859020 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: maz on December 07, 2013, 01:54:13 AM
 Cry

i'm actually LMAO

fuck i should have BOUGHT at 900

3 hours later

fuck i should have BOUGHT at 800

3 hours later

should I BUY at 700  Huh naaaaa

Reminds me of ME on the way up!

That explains everything.

Be happy, cheap coins on its way for you, just try to cost average, just buy more the lower it goes, that worked wonders for everybody in BTC so far Cheesy



1339. Post 3859052 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

1200 coins about to be dumped on stamp in 3, 2....



1340. Post 3859061 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: Nemo1024 on December 07, 2013, 01:58:39 AM
That wall on Bitstamp is aggressive!
Should have gone to bed 3 hours ago, but it's too fun to watch
I now have more bitcoins than when sell-off started, but I have less $-denominated. Tell me I didn't loose.. :/

You didn't.



1341. Post 3859103 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: maz on December 07, 2013, 02:00:26 AM
Does anyone else not even concerned, or is it just me? I'm enjoying just watching the chaos on the charts. Haven't sold a single BTC.

When you are content with your position in BTC it must be fantastic to sit and watch the show as entertainment and not emotional nerve wracking.

Bingo.

It also helps to invest what you can afford to lose.



1342. Post 3863283 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: pokerman on December 07, 2013, 03:16:56 AM
Quote

Well, if you're not interested in BTC and think it's failure I really don't see a point. I don't go on places I'm not interested in.

I never said I wasn't interested, it just seems that when someone comes up with a very valid argument that one of you bulls can not counter, they are either ignored or shunned.

Bitcoin is very interesting from an Anthropological standpoint.

I  can guarantee you that for all of us who bought in at low double digits or single digits it's very interesting from many other standpoints.

Sorry you missed the train and now you feel butthurt, bro.



1343. Post 3863667 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: Zangelbert Bingledack on December 07, 2013, 11:04:44 AM
Sadly Media is going to kill Bitcoin, they already started bitching about the price crash and if Bitcoin has a future, they think people will abandon it after this crash

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-12-05/bitcoins-volatility-problem-why-todays-sell-off-wont-be-the-last

http://www.bloomberg.com/video/alan-greenspan-on-fed-interest-rates-economy-rYRi6sqkSoKGxZ8BhbYBRw.html/
Quote
I

Bitcoin was famously declared dead in 2011 when it lost 95% of its value, then in April when it lost 80% of its value, now in December when it lost 50-60% of its value, crashing all the way down to...double the April top. (And April crash fell all the way down to...double the 2011 top.) Maybe pretty soon people will be lamenting a crash all the way down to $2500.

Very true my friend, funny that noobs throw their money at BTC without taking the time to do due diligence and study past history.



1344. Post 3863932 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: Searing on December 07, 2013, 11:35:33 AM
I have no idea what to do. I want to go to bed, but not sure if i should cash into btc now or stay in fiat.

me I have 28 coin..so gonna stick it out for those of you with a lot more...no idea...just saying

In case of doubt, hold unless you need the fiat.



1345. Post 3863952 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: micalith on December 07, 2013, 11:38:28 AM
right, so I'm hoping that this is the dead cat bounce which might confirm that we reached the bottom, rather than a sucker's bull trap. Either way, I would be amazed if we don't revisit 500s by the end of the weekend

It should definitely be a bull trap, 80% chances for it to be a bull trap.

Anyhow, bottom shouldn't be lower than $350ish in any case, and it should be reached quite fast.

Anyhow: I'm holding. Not worth to risk coins in this moment, after BTC just went full mainstream. Im content with my BTC position, I really don't need more of them but i will hate losing a bunch of them.



1346. Post 3863972 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.33h):

Quote from: simonk83 on December 07, 2013, 11:41:13 AM
right, so I'm hoping that this is the dead cat bounce which might confirm that we reached the bottom, rather than a sucker's bull trap. Either way, I would be amazed if we don't revisit 500s by the end of the weekend

It should definitely be a bull trap, 80% chances for it to be a bull trap.


Your statistic has 87.34% chance of being bullshit.

Ok, let's see if we revisit the $600s or not. Either way I will be happy, isn't BTC wonderful?



1347. Post 3866284 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: Coinseeker on December 07, 2013, 03:43:56 PM
I'm not fully convinced the correction is over, but Bitcoin is here to stay.  I've learned that much and after some of the ignorance I see posted around the web in the various comments sections of negative Bitcoin articles it actually makes me respect you crazy people here, even more.  Most people just have no clue how the money in their pocket and the system they live under is robbing them.  And they celebrate it.  It's saddening because they "rah rah" for a system designed to steal from them.  It angers me that this system still stands and these greedy bastards are still getting away with such corruption.  

I know, off topic rant.  Just wanted to say...keep fighting the good fight.  The people need us, even though most don't yet know it.

The funniest comments on BTC 's mainstream media articles are those written by people who think they are educated and explain how "Bitcoin has no intrinsic value" opposed to gold, silver, etc.

They just show how they understood nothing about the revolution that is the foundation of Bitcoin - that distributed ledger with many world changing uses called the blockchain.

Be happy - that ignorance is what makes buying now BTC still an awesome opportunity. When the world understands the profound implications of Bitcoin, then it will probably be too late to get in.



1348. Post 3866413 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Reading Coinseeker speaking some sense is really something.

Glad you are long, mate.



1349. Post 3866669 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: niothor on December 07, 2013, 04:32:19 PM

all alt coins are putting a lot of inflationary pressure on btc.


How many of the alt coins can be turned to dust by a couple of Jupiters? Smiley

All the ones that use SHA, but most use Scrypt.



1350. Post 3866713 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: maz on December 07, 2013, 04:33:57 PM

What a hilarious read. Another idiot journalist to ignore in future.

I laughed hard.

Don't you feel silly now?, asks the journalist.

Yes, I fill extremely silly to have had a 10,000% profit - and btw, how are your stocks going?, I answer.



1351. Post 3866723 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: niothor on December 07, 2013, 04:36:03 PM

all alt coins are putting a lot of inflationary pressure on btc.


How many of the alt coins can be turned to dust by a couple of Jupiters? Smiley

All the ones that use SHA, but most use Scrypt.

Common , you've go my point.
Also there will be some asic coming for scrypt soon. Smiley
I can't help myself laughing  of all the tears in the eyes of the "asic proof" believers.

Agreed. I'm eagerly waiting for widespread scrypt FPGAs, I bet there are already some hashing in the wild.



1352. Post 3866988 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: oda.krell on December 07, 2013, 04:44:55 PM

What a hilarious read. Another idiot journalist to ignore in future.

I laughed hard.

Don't you feel silly now?, asks the journalist.

Yes, I fill extremely silly to have had a 10,000% profit - and btw, how are your stocks going?, I answer.


Added to my gloat list. Started it a while ago, contains articles that are full of the smug "ha, you idiots, how could you ever think this would work" sentiment. Kind of like the quote by the then IBM chairman "'I think there is a world market for about five computers.".

I'm not only keeping this list updated to gloat when btc turns out to invalidate them, but more importantly, to know when these guys (and more importantly: publications) will start back pedaling, pretending "they always knew it would change the world".

Example: Business Insider's Joel Weisenthal. Calling Bitcoin a clown currency, now slowly changing his mind. I'll give him credit, he's still relatively quick to change his opinion.

The publications that *really* piss me off, because they *should* know better are Wired and the NYT. Say what you want about either of them, but they both have a talented pool of writers: it is (IMO) mainly an editorial choice to make the "voice of the publication" so strongly BTC negative.

They will eventually come around. And then, I will have my gloat list Cheesy





Oda, in fact It's very good that wired and others are so cautious/negative about Bitcoin - that just means that the opportunity is very real and huge, and that it's still open. The "be greedy when others are fearful" motto is not just another silly common place, its a hard cold truth in stocks and assets purchasing.

This doesn't change the fact that BTC is dangerous, and thus investing your life savings in it is completely foolish. But at the same time this negativity is a very clear sign that one cannot afford to lose the opportunity to throw some spare money at BTC - the potential for growth is still immense.



1353. Post 3871698 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

My bids patiently waiting at $400ish. Not moving them a bit yet. If they don't get filled I will just withdraw the money and put it to other uses.

Not looking too good for the short term bulls IMO.



1354. Post 3871780 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: gandhibt on December 08, 2013, 01:11:30 AM
My bids patiently waiting at $400ish. Not moving them a bit yet. If they don't get filled I will just withdraw the money and put it to other uses.

Not looking too good for the short term bulls IMO.

Next week is crucial maybe if we stay above 650 stamp more than below then we might correct faster but it is likely that we are entering short term bear market because of this dip. Are you in the same page with me?

Bitcoin is fueled by speculative manias in their purest form, when they fade a bear market is expected... But still, how low will it go? $370? $200? $150? Still higher than it was two months ago, and an order of magnitude higher than it was in January.



1355. Post 3871788 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 08, 2013, 01:13:23 AM
My bids patiently waiting at $400ish. Not moving them a bit yet. If they don't get filled I will just withdraw the money and put it to other uses.

Not looking too good for the short term bulls IMO.

do you really need more hookers and blow?      Wink

Man I tried to choose my words wisely, how come did you read my mind?

Cheesy



1356. Post 3884751 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

Quote from: I_bitcoin on December 09, 2013, 01:20:10 AM
Apparently the simpsons reference is negative in that someone lost money in a crash.

Thats bullish. It means it is going mainstream, and for it to grow there has to be fear, caution and negativity in the air.

The more "positive" the mainstream is, the closer is market saturation which means "time to sell"



1357. Post 3889553 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

TA is not very useful in a market as tiny as BTC, because one big holder can and will move the market at his will. It's just as a penny stock market. Just look how BTC usually reacts to "bearish pennants": 90% of the times they break upwards when they are supposed to go in the opposite direction.

Still interesting to discuss and analyze the charts, but we all know that b&h is THE strategy for BTC.



1358. Post 3891542 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.34h):

The current pattern fits very well in the "first sell off" phase of the classical bubble chart. It definitely doesn't look as a "bubble pop"



1359. Post 3899032 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on December 10, 2013, 12:31:11 AM
It really feels good when the train goes choo-choo man

Man, how do you find that stuff? That's hilarious Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1360. Post 3907388 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.35h):

Quote from: Odalv on December 10, 2013, 03:53:41 PM
To be honest, your not the only one who thinks we aren't finished with this crash/pop/correction/downtrend at the moment. I see lot's of evidence for and against and you've made some really interesting posts for it, but you really rob yourself of credibility when you say thing's like '10$' as the bottom price. I don't know if you actually believe it yourself or just want to appear trollish.

I'm kidding about $10. I thought it's obvious.
It will actually be $0.01  Grin

lol

trend line is broken on high volume. Going down.



LOL INDEED Cheesy Cheesy



1361. Post 3956636 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 13, 2013, 10:51:48 PM
china will go thru 5500 soon, they already punctured it and now they are oversold

Having seen my magic, perhaps you can now publicly acknowledge that I have 10,000 bitcoins, apologize, stfu and gtfo. OK?  Grin

If you want to prove that just sign a message with an address holding 10k and put that signed message in your signature - no need for nobody to "acknowledge", that would be a hard cold proof.

That's pure non spoofable crypto, heart and soul of Bitcoin.



1362. Post 3957051 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on December 14, 2013, 01:32:14 AM
china will go thru 5500 soon, they already punctured it and now they are oversold

Having seen my magic, perhaps you can now publicly acknowledge that I have 10,000 bitcoins, apologize, stfu and gtfo. OK?  Grin

If you want to prove that just sign a message with an address holding 10k and put that signed message in your signature - no need for nobody to "acknowledge", that would be a hard cold proof.

That's pure non spoofable crypto, heart and soul of Bitcoin.

That's not hard cold proof. It's susceptible to Man in the Middle attack.

Care to elaborate that? How could rpietila perform "a man in the middle attack" and make bitcointalk.org users to believe he signed a message with an address holding 10k BTC if he is not in control of an address with such an amount?



1363. Post 3957352 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: virtualfaqs on December 14, 2013, 01:54:38 AM
china will go thru 5500 soon, they already punctured it and now they are oversold

Having seen my magic, perhaps you can now publicly acknowledge that I have 10,000 bitcoins, apologize, stfu and gtfo. OK?  Grin

If you want to prove that just sign a message with an address holding 10k and put that signed message in your signature - no need for nobody to "acknowledge", that would be a hard cold proof.

That's pure non spoofable crypto, heart and soul of Bitcoin.

That's not hard cold proof. It's susceptible to Man in the Middle attack.

Care to elaborate that? How could rpietila perform "a man in the middle attack" and make bitcointalk.org users to believe he signed a message with an address holding 10k BTC if he is not in control of an address with such an amount?

Because there is nothing linking the Bitcoin address to his forum account. Hypothetically speaking, he could just ask a friend who has access to 10K BTC to sign a message and just post it. The difference is there is the possibility he can get 10K BTC account to sign a message, but he may not necessary control it.

But that's no man in the middle attack, in that case Risto would just be "borrowing" the coins for a specific purpose - signing the message, which is a proof he can have access (at least for that very purpose of signing the message) to 10k coins.

In any case, only a retard would accept to use 10k of his own coins to sign a message like "this coins belong to Risto Pietila", in practical terms Risto's "friend" would be handing to Risto the control of those bitcoins. That's like signing a contract, explain to a judge that "it was just a favor".



1364. Post 3957682 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 14, 2013, 02:19:39 AM
china will go thru 5500 soon, they already punctured it and now they are oversold

Having seen my magic, perhaps you can now publicly acknowledge that I have 10,000 bitcoins, apologize, stfu and gtfo. OK?  Grin

If you want to prove that just sign a message with an address holding 10k and put that signed message in your signature - no need for nobody to "acknowledge", that would be a hard cold proof.

That's pure non spoofable crypto, heart and soul of Bitcoin.

That's not hard cold proof. It's susceptible to Man in the Middle attack.

Care to elaborate that? How could rpietila perform "a man in the middle attack" and make bitcointalk.org users to believe he signed a message with an address holding 10k BTC if he is not in control of an address with such an amount?

Because there is nothing linking the Bitcoin address to his forum account. Hypothetically speaking, he could just ask a friend who has access to 10K BTC to sign a message and just post it. The difference is there is the possibility he can get 10K BTC account to sign a message, but he may not necessary control it.

But that's no man in the middle attack, in that case Risto would just be "borrowing" the coins for a specific purpose - signing the message, which is a proof he can have access (at least for that very purpose of signing the message) to 10k coins.

In any case, only a retard would accept to use 10k of his own coins to sign a message like "this coins belong to Risto Pietila", in practical terms Risto's "friend" would be handing to Risto the control of those bitcoins. That's like signing a contract, explain to a judge that "it was just a favor".

No.

The owner of those coins could sign the message for him. Risto would never need to control them. Virtualfaqs is right.

Meatspace equivalent: I can sign a contract in which I transfer to you the ownership of my house, but without ever handing to you the keys.

Finally:

If I have to prove on a forum that I own a $10M mansion, how about uploading a valid and verifiable contract of ownership of such mansion in my name? Wouldn't you consider that a proof of ownership?

Justin Bieber could be my friend and he could have signed a contract transferring to me the ownership of his mansion as a favour, but without ever handing to me the keys. I might never have intention to ask him for the keys nor to live in his mansion, I could just want to show off in here... But JB agreeing to underwrite such a contract is beyond retarded and plainly ridiculous. As retarded, ridiculous and unlikely as expecting someone to cryptographically sign a message such as "This 10k BTC belong to Risto Pietila" with an address holding 10k BTC that do NOT belong to Risto.

Probably you do not fully understand the strong implications of such a message - any cryptographically signed message is potentially binding, and that's why the QT client warns you about signing only messages to which content you fully agree. If Risto has such "friends" that sign those messages for him I congratulate and envy him.



1365. Post 3957702 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

TL;DR: Risto sign a message such as "this coins belong to Risto Pietila" with an address holding 10k BTC or gtfo and stfu.



1366. Post 3957957 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 14, 2013, 02:46:28 AM
china will go thru 5500 soon, they already punctured it and now they are oversold

Having seen my magic, perhaps you can now publicly acknowledge that I have 10,000 bitcoins, apologize, stfu and gtfo. OK?  Grin

If you want to prove that just sign a message with an address holding 10k and put that signed message in your signature - no need for nobody to "acknowledge", that would be a hard cold proof.

That's pure non spoofable crypto, heart and soul of Bitcoin.

That's not hard cold proof. It's susceptible to Man in the Middle attack.

Care to elaborate that? How could rpietila perform "a man in the middle attack" and make bitcointalk.org users to believe he signed a message with an address holding 10k BTC if he is not in control of an address with such an amount?

Because there is nothing linking the Bitcoin address to his forum account. Hypothetically speaking, he could just ask a friend who has access to 10K BTC to sign a message and just post it. The difference is there is the possibility he can get 10K BTC account to sign a message, but he may not necessary control it.

But that's no man in the middle attack, in that case Risto would just be "borrowing" the coins for a specific purpose - signing the message, which is a proof he can have access (at least for that very purpose of signing the message) to 10k coins.

In any case, only a retard would accept to use 10k of his own coins to sign a message like "this coins belong to Risto Pietila", in practical terms Risto's "friend" would be handing to Risto the control of those bitcoins. That's like signing a contract, explain to a judge that "it was just a favor".

No.

The owner of those coins could sign the message for him. Risto would never need to control them. Virtualfaqs is right.

Meatspace equivalent: I can sign a contract in which I transfer to you the ownership of my house, but without ever handing to you the keys.

Finally:

If I have to prove on a forum that I own a $10M mansion, how about uploading a valid and verifiable contract of ownership of such mansion in my name? Wouldn't you consider that a proof of ownership?

Justin Bieber could be my friend and he could have signed the contract as a favour, without ever handing to me the keys. But that's beyond retarded and plainly ridiculous. As retarded, ridiculous and unlikely as expecting someone to cryptographically sign a message such as "This 10k BTC belong to Risto Pietila" with an address holding 10k BTC that do NOT belong to Risto.

Probably you do not fully understand the strong implications of such a message - any cryptographically signed message is potentially binding, and that's why the QT client warns you about signing only messages to which content you fully agree. If Risto has such "friends" that sign those messages for him I congratulate and envy him.

Uh, no, that's not the meatspace equivalent. There's no practical significance to signing someone else's message with your address. The person with the private key maintains full and absolute control. Said owner could simply transfer those coins after a suitable amount of time passed to satisfy everyone.

The meatspace equivalent is telling Risto's buddies that he owns your house.

We will have to agree to disagree: i) For you cryptographically signed messages have no significance, ii) for me they have a very strong significance.

You do not "own" the coins; the private keys "own" the coins. Using the private key of an addy holding 10k BTC of your coins to sign a message stating than the owner is an individual other than you has a very strong significance for me and I wouldn't do it. As a start, I would be worried about that individual claiming in the future that that priv keys were stolen from him. Sure no judge would understand nothing about this (yet), so you might be right about the lack of "practical" significances as there are no legal precedents on that sense - but I bet there will be a lot of practical significances in the futures. I believe we will see a lot of smart properties/contracts implemented on the blockchain and a lot of legally binding agreements based on message-signing with addresses privkeys.

In any case: I don't think rpietila has 10k BTC nor the access to someone with 10k BTC willing to sign on his behalf the following message: "these 10k BTC belong to Risto Pietila"



1367. Post 3958158 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: windjc on December 14, 2013, 03:29:05 AM
Lol. This is the stupidest fucking thread derail in the history of bitcointalk.

Welcome to the Wall Observer.

This thread has always been a mix of:

i) infinite trolling
ii) a lot of off-topic ramblings
iii) some deep philosophical discussion
iv) very little TA

Plus, is kinda on-topic: Rpietila says in this thread (and all over the forum) he has 10k BTC and, specifically, that he uses them to manipulate the market.

We could just use less ego-filled chatter and more crypto proof.



1368. Post 3958226 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: Voodah on December 14, 2013, 03:40:18 AM
Indeed, this whole discussion and peer bullying is stupid. Enough with the Rpietila bashing.

Let the guy speak his mind, the same as we all do. I know lots of people don't like the way he expresses himself or agree with his analysis, but be honest now..

I'd much rather read any of rpietila's post (I always find them interesting and thought-provoking, even when I disagree with what he's saying or how) than most of the sub-par content I'm used to finding both here and  in other places like Reddit.

Let's bask in how different we all are and how rich that makes us. No need to alienate people, specially active people who contribute original content on a regular basis.

Some of his threads are interesting and his "general" advices are sound (like the SSS thread).

All his price calls are wrong and he is a contrarian indicator.

All his tales about successful trading, manipulation, etc. are proven bullshit. He makes most of that up.

Finally, his business model is to create the character of a super-wealthy super-successful trader so he can attract the attention of newcomers and then sell them BTC with a markup. It's pretty obvious and he has even admitted it in some sanity moments he has had.



1369. Post 3960518 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.37h):

Quote from: NewLiberty on December 14, 2013, 05:01:42 AM

We will have to agree to disagree: i) For you cryptographically signed messages have no significance, ii) for me they have a very strong significance.

Legally binding in USA
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/7001

And much of the world
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signatures_and_law

Thank you very much, I didn't know this but I did know that id never sign a message as the one we are discussing.



1370. Post 3964130 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: proudhon on December 14, 2013, 03:48:38 PM
I felt severe nostalgia looking through old Bitcoin posts yesterday.

We were all dealing with nothing back then, but it was fun and exciting nonetheless.

2011, #bitcoin, those were fun times.

Enjoy, is 2013 and your boldness has been rewarded, you are now a millionaire and soon  you  will have to face "first world problems": taxes

Wink



1371. Post 3964203 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.38h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 14, 2013, 03:53:01 PM
Sometimes, repetition is the key to being funny. Mostly it's just boring.

Edit: What the, that was directed at fr33d0m1z3r or however he spells his nick - their post is gone, though. Is this thread being moderated after all?
Must have deleted it himself. I don't delete posts in this thread, except maybe malicious stuff.

2011, #bitcoin, those were fun times.
Bitcoin is definitely the most addictive MMO to date.

Reptilia is probably having one of his mania phases again. Hope it doesn't last too long.

Agreed about rpietila. He deleted like 8 posts of mine in his "OP moderated" threads in the Economics subforum. I just respectfully proved that his "RMB/USD" arbitrage is BS and instead of disputing that proof he went berserk and deleted all my posts. Bad sign. I hope his doctors are not watching.



1372. Post 4023453 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: seleme on December 18, 2013, 10:35:24 AM
I wish it was a simple crash though, those are not making people to scream "Bitcoin is dead" like it is now the case.

Why? The crashes that make people scream "Bitcoin is dead" are the best crashes. More people screams "Bitcoin is dead", the bigger is the buying opportunity.

I hope the US follows China and "ban" bitcoin soon. I'm one of those who thinks that its pretty much unavoidable at some point, and in fact I'm surprised that it hasn't happened yet.

This game is played in the long run. Anxious to be a multi-millionaire? Then probably you will sell too soon. Ask yourself if you are into this only for the fiat profits - if the answer is yes probably you are into a game that is too risky. If the answer is no, the ban on Bitcoin is just a step needed for it to demonstrate that it is really the resilient, de-centralized currency that will change the world.

If you have been in the game for a few months, I hope you already secured some profits by selling a few coins at a rationally-decided target. If you just entered the game, just hold - we will see where we are in a couple of years.

Grabbing popcorn. Sending fiat to exchanges. Enjoy, gents.
            



1373. Post 4023602 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: seleme on December 18, 2013, 10:44:59 AM
I wish it was a simple crash though, those are not making people to scream "Bitcoin is dead" like it is now the case.

Why? The crashes that make people scream "Bitcoin is dead" are the best crashes. More people screams "Bitcoin is dead", the bigger is the buying opportunity.

I hope the US follows China and "ban" bitcoin soon. I'm one of those who thinks that its pretty much unavoidable at some point, and in fact I'm surprised that it hasn't happened yet.

This game is played in the long run. Anxious to be a multi-millionaire? Then probably you will sell too soon. Ask yourself if you are into this only for the fiat profits - if the answer is yes probably you are into a game that is too risky. If the answer is no, the ban on Bitcoin is just a step needed for it to demonstrate that it is really the resilient, de-centralized currency that will change the world.

If you have been in the game for a few months, I hope you already secured some profits by selling a few coins at a rationally-decided target. If you just entered the game, just hold - we will see where we are in a couple of years.

Grabbing popcorn. Sending fiat to exchanges. Enjoy, gents.
            

Well, I wouldn't like US to ban Bitcoin tbh.

I'm too old to think about changing the world tbh, that's like 15 years ago, I'm here about making the money and that would be shit.

I'm "too old" for many things, but not for wishing the world to change: I have kids, and I'd prefer them to live in a better world.

A lot of people seem to forget that BTC was designed by Satoshi Nakomato to disrupt factual powers and to challenge the people that actually rule the world - the bankers.

He knew that the probability of BTC being banned/attacked was HUGE, and that's why he took so many precautions to remain anonymous. A lot of wanna-be traders seem to forget that and just get excited with their unrealized fiat profits while they day-dream about the Ferrari they will buy next year. Probably Satoshi is laughing at that, while is without any doubt a good thing for BTC viral adoption - there's no better fuel than greed to move human beings.

Of course if BTC finally succeeds there is also a substantial economic reward by being an "early adopter". But this is a dangerous game. If you are not prepared to see BTC banned, BTC holders prosecuted, and/or BTC eventually going to 0 then you don't really understand what BTC is and you probably made a huge mistake investing your time and money in it.




1374. Post 4023633 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: rpietila on December 18, 2013, 10:49:43 AM
I don't think it will go much lower anymore in the short term. Even if they sell it to zero in China does not mean that the west would not have competition on who would get the cheap coins. Short term we are very oversold and it is only a liquidity/waking hours issue to go back up. The fact that there is a huge arbitrage coin influx from China dampens it a "little bit", though, but this is already in prices in the west.

The exponential trend (now at $437) was touched, which means that longer term bitcoin is no more overvalued. I regard this as a good entry point and have bought thousands of bitcoins yesterday and today, closing all speculative short positions at a nice profit and gone speculative long with funds I need in 1-2 months.

My last bid in Bidstamp is sitting at 421.42, please somebody sell into it! Smiley

Only 44 coins on 421.42 Risto? I thought you were a whale Sad



1375. Post 4023802 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 18, 2013, 11:11:29 AM
Next time I meet someone from China I'm kicking them square in the nuts.  

EDIT: Someone from the Chinese Central Bank. Not Chinese people in general.

You should thank them. Cheap coins for you.



1376. Post 4023854 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.41h):

Quote from: crazy_rabbit on December 18, 2013, 11:12:52 AM
Oh gosh.. about to hit $400 on stamp.

This has got to be near the bottom now right guys... when to pull the trigger....

It's fallen a long way already. How much further do you realistically think it's going to drop. This could turn back up suddenly and there's been some big buys already...

Honestly- It's going to $200. Will probably rocket up if you want to feel better about it. But no way this train won't stop till a) we've erased the speculative bubble CAUSED by the chinese b) plus a little extra drop just from Western panic from the whole spectacle.

That puts us in the $200 range for sure.

Great. BTC never deflated to BELOW the previous ATH (2011 went from $0.8 to $32 and deflated to $2; beg. 2013 went from $12 to $266 and deflated to $50).

It would be very interesting to see how people reacted to a deflation below $266. Will the paper bitcoin holders (BIT) dump everything? Will the media say that Bitcoin destroyed many people lives, and run real-life stories about people that lost all their savings to BTC?

That would be cute and expected.

Interesting times ahead.



1377. Post 4025851 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: proudhon on December 18, 2013, 11:32:42 AM
Who is still in the green at these prices? And who made a huge loss?

If I go out of the green, then it's bad.

Don't lie. You cannot go out of the green. I recouped my investment by aprox. 7x while I still keep 90% of my coins, I'm sure you already covered your initial investment and secured healthy profit years ago.



1378. Post 4025919 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Vycid on December 18, 2013, 02:15:45 PM
Protip: Rational bears don't sell at $700, then buy back higher and start screaming that we're headed to the moon shortly before we top out.

You described what happened very accurately, sir. Wink



1379. Post 4026472 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Shorting BTC is the most retarded thing one can do. Who the fuck is so clueless to short an asset that has historically grown multiple hundred % points per year?

Including leverage in the sporting equation is the cherry on the cake. We had a couple of guys bragging about how they were shorting with 5:1 leverage last summer and we know how they ended up: broke in just a few minutes, they couldn't even realize what the fuck was going on.

I just hope that some of the guys that fear Government retaliation already recouped their fiat investment so they can put their mind to rest. It helps. Then you will give zero fucks whatever the price does. This is game is about much more than just fiat profits.



1380. Post 4026578 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: seleme on December 18, 2013, 03:00:08 PM
I decided to not play with leverage shorting for some other reasons and not loss of 1000$ in 2 shorting trades I made. But if I didn't I'd be shorting last night definitely and it would be all but stupid. You could cut crash in the air few hours before it happened last night.

So, it is completely irrelevant how much is bitcoin going up annually if you do a shorting in right time for short time. 1000 shorted coins last night could buy me a house at this moment.

Yep, and if my mom had engines she would be a Lambo.

Seriously: Bitcoin leveraged shorting is the most reckless gamble one can do. Please try and then report bad how it went. Just one hour too late to close your position and you are broke.



1381. Post 4026731 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Nightowlace on December 18, 2013, 03:05:53 PM
You really think a 25B error coin wouldn't sell for 32B at the current price, or any other price?

Obviously It did. Check the link in my signature. It's what I do. My point was my view on things. You can't look at it as a $5,000 loss you have to look at it as a 7B gain. You're missing the point.

That was risky. Why didn't you sell that coin directly for BTC instead of going through fiat?

I would have sold it for BTC for sure.



1382. Post 4026778 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: seleme on December 18, 2013, 03:14:55 PM
Anyone else getting the 'Told You So!' 'treatment' in work today?

Bitcoins 50% decline on front page of BBC. Can't even be bothered to answer most of them now.....just confirms my thoughts that we are all still early adopters and any price is a good price at the moment.

Not if you tell them that Bitcoin crashes are part of the game when you are talking them about Bitcoin. You cover yourself so they can't look smart ever  Grin

Them seeing with their eyes how much your lifestyle has improved by just throwing a couple of grands to BTC at some point is an even more effective strategy.



1383. Post 4033247 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: pickard on December 18, 2013, 11:23:30 PM
Were in for another sell off
With which coins?

www.blockchained.com

For the first time, ask volume decreased during the crash, proving that the sells were pure panic. By this time after the november, 900-450 crashcorrection, ask volume had doubled and reached eventually triple the magnitude. In april it also skyrocketed to 4-5 times the initial value.  Now it shows absolutely no will to even get back to pre-crash levels.
Honestly, I'm at a loss for how ask depth is a useful indicator here. We have no idea how many coins are waiting in the wings, off the books. And we don't know the extent of arbitrage being done by Chinese traders.

^This. I still can't believe there's such a huge gap between Gox & BTC China. May not be so easy to arbitrage. But was there always a 100 difference between prices?

BTCchina used to be higher than gox as I remember it.  by quite a bit.  now it's 100 lower.

Arbitrage has never been possible between the western and the Chinese exchange, the only one bragging about how he was doing arbitrage was rpietila, demonstrating how he's just full of shit.

Then he tried to explain how he did "arbitrage": he sold on china and then waited for the price spread to be 0 or near 0, to then transfer the BTC to Bitstamp and sell there... LOL, if that's arbitrage my mom is a jet fighter.



1384. Post 4033330 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: MAbtc on December 18, 2013, 11:31:17 PM
Were in for another sell off
With which coins?

www.blockchained.com

For the first time, ask volume decreased during the crash, proving that the sells were pure panic. By this time after the november, 900-450 crashcorrection, ask volume had doubled and reached eventually triple the magnitude. In april it also skyrocketed to 4-5 times the initial value.  Now it shows absolutely no will to even get back to pre-crash levels.
Honestly, I'm at a loss for how ask depth is a useful indicator here. We have no idea how many coins are waiting in the wings, off the books. And we don't know the extent of arbitrage being done by Chinese traders.

^This. I still can't believe there's such a huge gap between Gox & BTC China. May not be so easy to arbitrage. But was there always a 100 difference between prices?

BTCchina used to be higher than gox as I remember it.  by quite a bit.  now it's 100 lower.

Arbitrage has never been possible between the western and the Chinese exchange, the only one bragging about how he was doing arbitrage was rpietila, demonstrating how he's just full of shit.

Are we sure about that?

Yes. If arbitrage was possible we wouldn't have such spreads, the market would immediately take care of them. Arbitrage is risk free profit, if it's possible to have it you exploit it.

And btw, I respectfully proved how rpietila was not making "arbitrage" between China and Stamp, but he deleted all my posts.

The problem is that you cannot efficiently move fiat between exchanges.



1385. Post 4033587 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Dragonkiller on December 18, 2013, 11:44:15 PM
Were in for another sell off
With which coins?

www.blockchained.com

For the first time, ask volume decreased during the crash, proving that the sells were pure panic. By this time after the november, 900-450 crashcorrection, ask volume had doubled and reached eventually triple the magnitude. In april it also skyrocketed to 4-5 times the initial value.  Now it shows absolutely no will to even get back to pre-crash levels.
Honestly, I'm at a loss for how ask depth is a useful indicator here. We have no idea how many coins are waiting in the wings, off the books. And we don't know the extent of arbitrage being done by Chinese traders.

^This. I still can't believe there's such a huge gap between Gox & BTC China. May not be so easy to arbitrage. But was there always a 100 difference between prices?

BTCchina used to be higher than gox as I remember it.  by quite a bit.  now it's 100 lower.

Arbitrage has never been possible between the western and the Chinese exchange, the only one bragging about how he was doing arbitrage was rpietila, demonstrating how he's just full of shit.

Are we sure about that?

Yes. If arbitrage was possible we wouldn't have such spreads, the market would immediately take care of them. Arbitrage is risk free profit, if it's possible to have it you exploit it.

And btw, I respectfully proved how rpietila was not making "arbitrage" between China and Stamp, but he deleted all my posts.

The problem is that you cannot efficiently move fiat between exchanges.

http://reuters.com/article/2013/12/11/us-china-bitcoin-idUKBRE9BA0B020131211

The spread between china and stamp/Gox has been consistently big. Exchanging RMB for USD cheaply and efficiently its complicate for "foreign traders". In fact, on rpietilas post I politely asked him to explain how he managed to move fiat between western and China exchange. He answered that he didn't, his way of doing "arbitrage" was buying low on stamp, selling high on BTCChina, and then patiently waiting for the spread to go to 0 or near 0, to then buy the coins on China again and sell them on stamp.

I guess that anybody with half a brain understands that has nothing to do with arbitrage. Arbitrage needs to be quasi immediate and risk free by definition. The above process is not risk free at all: you need to bet on the spread going at 0 or near 0 (and you need to waste resources monitoring that), and what happens if in the meantime the price doubles? That you lost half of your coins, that's not arbitrage.

Don't believe what Reuters writes - they are clueless. Probably the "journalist" documented himself by reading Risto's delusional ramblings, or checking the BTC-E troll box. There is one hard cold fact that proves that arbitrages between exchanges is not possible: the spread is consistently high among ALL of them. When arbitrage is possible, the spread is zero - full stop.



1386. Post 4033669 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.42h):

Quote from: Sitarow on December 19, 2013, 12:00:41 AM
Anyone care to guess the bottom on this one?

Die hard nay sayers say sub $200

$298 for me.



1387. Post 4038230 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: OldGeek on December 19, 2013, 06:48:58 AM

If you want to operate in Gox with 1 day transfers, then that's what you need.

I appreciate Gox is in Japan...its just we weren't talking about Gox (were we OldGeek?)

I gave up trying to get money out of Gox long ago...I think you need to be very connected or very rich to do that....of which I am neither may I add Wink

Yeah we were kinda-sorta talking about MtSux.  However, I'm trying to figure out, in my tiny brain, how exactly people think that arbi is being carried out.  Any exchange 'could' work if everything was right.  I just don't see it happening.

Because is not happening.



1388. Post 4046042 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: mmitech on December 19, 2013, 06:50:32 PM
what a shame.... Max keiser brings a clone to Maxkeiser report to talk about Quark ... he said "for me it is the best coins out there because it is more secure...." WTF !!!?Huh   http://youtu.be/0oYkMLph6NA?t=19m14s

these are criminals, they pump and dump, these are the people who makes me question the concept of crypto each time I hear them


Anyone listening to this clowns is a moron, full stop. They speak nonsense and are mostly clueless. Quark is an instamined scam, very insecure because of its fast maturity. That's so obvious that is painful.

I'm amazed by the amount of supporters Max Keiser has on this forum. It's pathetic.



1389. Post 4046228 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: seriouscoin on December 19, 2013, 07:01:11 PM
what a shame.... Max keiser brings a clone to Maxkeiser report to talk about Quark ... he said "for me it is the best coins out there because it is more secure...." WTF !!!?Huh   http://youtu.be/0oYkMLph6NA?t=19m14s

these are criminals, they pump and dump, these are the people who makes me question the concept of crypto each time I hear them


Anyone listening to this clowns is a moron, full stop. They speak nonsense and are mostly clueless. Quark is an instamined scam, very insecure because of its fast maturity. That's so obvious that is painful.

I'm amazed by the amount of supporters Max Keiser has on this forum. It's pathetic.

pre-mined ...cough ... enough say


oh and market cap means nothing because its bases on total qrkcoins in few hands..... yeah



The fact is pre/insta mined speaks for itself, I agree... But also that those clows say that it is "more secure because the algorythm is more complex and thus more difficult for the NSA to crack" is utter nonsense and demonstrate these guys know NOTHING and just spit bullshit. Quark is in fact very insecure because of its too fast maturity - in just a few months the reward will drop to 1 Quark per block. No more financial incentives for the miners to mine and very cheap 51% attack for an hostile entity, unless adoption and transfer volumes skyrockets exponentially and thus high fees make a high enough incentive. That won't happen.

Quark is a pathetic scam, everybody buying them with the hopes of it being "something" is a retarded and Max Keiser and the other moron are just clowns who were probably bribed by those who created the Quarkcoin scam.



1390. Post 4048368 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Care to explain wtf is overstock.com to an European fellow that never heard about them before?



1391. Post 4049238 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: TheCoinBull on December 19, 2013, 09:31:50 PM
Care to explain wtf is overstock.com to an European fellow that never heard about them before?
Typical forum member, why research it myself and get real answers, when I can ask manipulators, schemers, and total schmucks...

Mine was just a way of saying that nobody knows who the f is overstock.com outside the US - and no, overstock is not only "one step behind amazon", in terms of turnover is at least 30 steps behind amazon, which is indeed a global brand.

I guess my irony was not very good, sorry for that.



1392. Post 4049690 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: Loaded on December 19, 2013, 11:00:24 PM
Picked up a large amount of BTC that would otherwise have hit the market, at the CNY rate.

Its not very difficult to bring large amounts of USD into China on a private plane. I have a close relationship with my A&P.

Single or multiple sellers?



1393. Post 4049722 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on December 19, 2013, 11:15:53 PM
The big question is: Is Loaded the Winkledouches?

I'd bet for "no", they seem to have different styles.... But I won't bet too much.



1394. Post 4049937 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: gandhibt on December 19, 2013, 11:33:28 PM
The big question is: Is Loaded the Winkledouches?

I'd bet for "no", they seem to have different styles.... But I won't bet too much.


Only one way to find out:

Yo, loaded! Nice try to freeload on Zuckerberg. When exactly did that seem like a good idea?


(see, if he gets defensive, he's a Winklevoss. I'm *great* at psychology, I tell you.)

it doesnt work if you tell what you're doing Cheesy

did i understood correctly that Loaded smuggled shitload of $ to china to buy cheap coins? Grin

Sshh, don't ask too many questions, bro.

BTW: yours was a bold move loaded, good job - those coins won't hit the market in panic I guess, better for everybody.

In other news: what to do with tens of millions of USD in cash in China? First world problems I guess Cheesy



1395. Post 4054762 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: Erdogan on December 20, 2013, 08:04:21 AM
I am buying with cash, gold, and some silver.

I am long term bullish, but sell when clients want to. Inducing panic only hurts my own holdings, which I have not sold a single BTC of.

Your life is pretty interesting. Very cool-- thank you for your decency. Bitcoin is good peeps. Cheers

Tip for our dear early adopters, if you get are annoyed by these "Loaded" guys, take a notice how he mentioned buying with gold and silver.
If you read between the lines they are close to exhausting their funds. I wouldn't hope for a bigger sucker at this point....

Tip for our dear early adopters, if you get are annoyed by this "ElectricMucus" guy, take a notice how he mentioned that he doesn't own bitcoins and doesn't trade bitcoins.
If you read between the lines he is just here to troll. He is hoping you are a big sucker.

He is one of the early rejectors.

Poor guy sold too many BTC too early. If he had believed a little more, now he would have dozens of millions in usd.

Early rejectors follow similar patterns. They've been predicting BTC going to near-zero for years. When and if that happens, they will proudly scream: I TOLD YOU SO, regardless of BTC having gone to 4, 5 or 6 figures before the final crash.

From now on, the only satisfaction they pursue is to be right at some point. It's interesting to see how most early rejectors are into scamcoins, litecoin above all - that's very telling and demonstrates the kind of butthurt they are feeling.



1396. Post 4057098 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: electronistul on December 20, 2013, 12:14:03 PM
I got a feeling that sometime these days, people are going to say: "thanks for inflating the price at such small volumes, we're just going to sell off again 'till we reach ~ $ 400 prices".
Anybody thinks this is a reasonable chain of thought, or should I trust that Risto is not going to allow this to happen at all ?

Wow, Pietila is really doing a great job by deceiving you noobs.



1397. Post 4057465 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: mellowyellow on December 20, 2013, 11:33:05 AM
But he does tend to get it right.

Wrong. You are very new here, but he tends to get it wrong most of the times, I'd say as much as 90% of the times.

Don't have the time to dig all the old posts (plus he tends to delete them when he gets it wrong), but I will make you a very short summary of some of Risto Pietila's calls:

Quote
"anyone who does not believe that we will hit $300k per BTC by this year is in denial of the facts"
- spring 2013 (this was not trolling, this was a very real and serious prediction he made earlier this year)

Quote
"we will never see $100 again"
- summer 2013 - we went below $100 (till $67) a few days after

Quote
"i turned bear, I'm selling and buying back cheaper in a few days"
- November 2013 - he sold at $700 hoping to buy back cheaper and had to buy back at a loss shortly after

Quote
"i turned bull, I was wrong earlier and we are going to the moon"
- December 2013 - we were trading at $1200, the peak was reached shortly after and we crashed

I could go on FOREVER.

As some have said, Risto makes some very interesting general analysis threads, but:


Let me get straight that I haven't got anything personal against Risto, is just that I feel bad when I see noobs thinking he is some kind of über-successful master BTC trade, while in reality he is mostly smoke and mirrors. As we are supposed to be a community, sometimes I feel the urge to warn newcomers and tell them to analyze more thoroughly the character before thinking to risk their money to/with him.



1398. Post 4057520 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.43h):

Quote from: oda.krell on December 20, 2013, 12:49:54 PM
I got a feeling that sometime these days, people are going to say: "thanks for inflating the price at such small volumes, we're just going to sell off again 'till we reach ~ $ 400 prices".
Anybody thinks this is a reasonable chain of thought, or should I trust that Risto is not going to allow this to happen at all ?

Wow, Pietila is really doing a great job by deceiving you noobs.


I present: The Pietila-Noobs learning cycle.


stage 1: "Wow, this guy has sooo much money. And he sounds so smart. Let me read all his old post and follow his advice."

[a week later]

stage 2: "Hm, now he's starting to sound a bit crazy. Better take his words with a grain of salt."

[another week later]

stage 3: "What a clown! I have to warn the newbies not to trust him!"


Tongue

I have to say that in his "second phase" on this forum he sounds much saner. I hope it lasts.



1399. Post 4058589 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: spooderman on December 20, 2013, 02:23:38 PM
Anyone see that email from gox? Cheesy

Yes.

What a joke.



1400. Post 4061563 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

And now Blitz decides what type of off topic rambling is acceptable in this thread which is just a troll box where everybody (including you, Blitz) has been rambling and trolling about everything that crossed their minds, while TA was just a background fuzzy noise.

I hope you just had a bad day.



1401. Post 4063398 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 20, 2013, 08:42:39 PM


FML i tarde on virtex

Wow- you are tarding? I thought you were hodling

Don't tarde, hodl!!!!

Cheesy Cheesy



1402. Post 4063440 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: Patel on December 20, 2013, 08:46:30 PM
Just wait until the next 3 blocks hit, all hell is about to break loose

Why 3? On Gox you need 6 confs BTW



1403. Post 4065078 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: Patel on December 20, 2013, 10:58:19 PM
Hloy siht. Is taht wall real? (on stamp)
damn 4.5k wall

I can just assume its fake and pure manipulation. Nobody is so clueless to hope that a 4.5K ask wall will just be eaten in this market.

To eat that you'd need 20% of the fiat currently in the order book.

Good luck with that




1404. Post 4069689 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: JulieFig on December 20, 2013, 11:20:02 PM
I've had three friends pull their money out and walk away from bit coin over the past few days.

Well done market makers / manipulators!

Really?   They didn't know going in that this happens?   I am very careful to explain the risks and how these things work to my friends.   Not one is less interested now than they were, which is to say most are quite sorry they didn't buy when I told them they should  Tongue

Did your friends lose money?

He lost about 3-4K $... oh well

There was a lady who bought at $1000 posting on this forum who had to take out a loan on their house to buy her first BTC. Kept talking about her dad investing 3000 BTC and trying to convince her to make her first buy. I wonder what happened to her.  Embarrassed

I'm still here Smiley. Still reading... Still 'hodling'. I paid $1080 for each of my 11.1 bitcoins and have not sold - I rationalise this like so: bitcoin is only worth as much as someone is willing to pay for it right? And I refuse to sell them for less, which means they are still worth at least $1080 . Ergo, I have lost no money Wink. How's that for a comforting delusion?

You rock, Lady.



1405. Post 4069847 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: MikeH on December 21, 2013, 04:42:49 AM
dogecoin is like tulips dipped in shit.
i find it to be lulz

yeah I found it funny too til like $10 million poured into it and I'm like what the hell are you doing!!?



$10M did not pour into doge at all, just like $7 billion did not pour into BTC.

Do you understand what "market cap" means?

Practical example:

There are 1M doge coins. I want to buy 1, you sell 1 doge to me for $10. Market cap is now $10M but only $10 "poured" into it.

Just do not forget that doge is a satiric project, made to ridicule alts. When cryptsy listed it the first time they did it at an insanely high price (0.08 BTC) just for trolling. It's a joke, a prank, a parody. It's a humoristic tribute to "pump and dumps" and scamcoins.

If somebody is so retarded to invest real money in that, then he deserves to be burnt hard and to lose everything.



1406. Post 4070677 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.44h):

Quote from: JulieFig on December 21, 2013, 09:00:30 AM
I've had three friends pull their money out and walk away from bit coin over the past few days.

Well done market makers / manipulators!

Really?   They didn't know going in that this happens?   I am very careful to explain the risks and how these things work to my friends.   Not one is less interested now than they were, which is to say most are quite sorry they didn't buy when I told them they should  Tongue

Did your friends lose money?

He lost about 3-4K $... oh well

There was a lady who bought at $1000 posting on this forum who had to take out a loan on their house to buy her first BTC. Kept talking about her dad investing 3000 BTC and trying to convince her to make her first buy. I wonder what happened to her.  Embarrassed

I'm still here Smiley. Still reading... Still 'hodling'. I paid $1080 for each of my 11.1 bitcoins and have not sold - I rationalise this like so: bitcoin is only worth as much as someone is willing to pay for it right? And I refuse to sell them for less, which means they are still worth at least $1080 . Ergo, I have lost no money Wink. How's that for a comforting delusion?

That's not delusion, an unrealized loss is not a loss. I wish I had that strength-- if you continue your patience, you will be rewarded like so many else who have held. Hopefully, it's not rent money, and you don't need to touch it for several months or a year. Smiley

Mad props for even finding my post. Money is on loan against the house right? Need to calculate loan interest and compare it to BTC EV - Tough call. Good luck to you!!! Smiley

Thanks! I did do some calculations before buying the coins - the repayments on the house are so much anyway that a withdrawal of $12k hardly makes a difference (isn't that depressing).

Never really taken a risk like this before, but what the hell right? Besides, after reading about Bitcoin (my research at work took a backseat - oops) it's become a bit of an obsession... I only picked up on your post because I read this damn thread every day and have the bitcoinwisdom tab open all day to monitor the price. It's almost (almost!) worth paying $12k just to be a part of this ride..... well maybe not that much Smiley.

Debt is against my religion - going into debt to make a speculative investment feels so crazy to me that it blows my mind. I guess you US folks are so much in debt that you give zero fucks about going into debt a bit more.

That said, is clear that the average investment for participants in the market is growing. When I bought into BTC, throwing at it $5k was definitely a bold move, and above the average.

As an example, even rpietila, who had experience with gold and silver, bought in with only $10k, which anyhow was way above the average investment at the time he bought in. I guess the rule was:

"throw only play money you can definitely afford to throw to the trash bin; if BTC realizes its potential it will be more than enough".

This is changing fast and newcomers are starting to throw serious money to BTC, taking loans and so forth. That's a dangerous game. During the next boom and bust cycle expect "real life stories" of people who lost everything to BTC because of wrong choices, anxiety and poor understanding of the nature of BTC.

I guess that's what we get with mainstream attention.



1407. Post 4078693 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: mmitech on December 21, 2013, 09:35:56 PM
watching the order book getting updated, I think something is about to happen !!!

Saturday's bearapocalypse??



1408. Post 4094536 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on December 22, 2013, 09:12:37 PM
If Satoshi is exiting perhaps we should pay attention. 

We are.



1409. Post 4094852 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: Peter R on December 22, 2013, 09:27:06 PM
If Satoshi is exiting perhaps we should pay attention. 

We are.

Do we have any evidence that the old coins recently moved could have been from Satoshi?  I understand that the Satoshi coin are sitting in 50 BTC blocks, untouched since mining.  Has anyone been able to see if the old coins that just moved were from a bunch of old addresses each containing 50 BTC?

In fact I believe those are not Satoshi's coins. Show me a stash that didn't move from 2010, and I might believe its Satoshi's. But this stash, originary from 2011? It's not Satoshi for me.

I entertain the idea is knightmb moving/cashing out part of his 400k coins after the heat from the Romeneys Bitcoin ransom has passed.

Noone believed he donated his 400k coins to wikileaks as he said, there's no proof of that on the blockchain.



1410. Post 4101168 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on December 23, 2013, 12:22:28 AM
According to i286 ticker, ask sum is approaching 60k coins. Is that accurate or is the API screwed up again?
Does that page add up asks on multiple exchanges? I just did it manually with MtGox, Bitstamp and BTC-E and got at least 69k. On MtGox, it's 33k right now.

That pages (i286) gives very awkward results, always much higher than what bitcoinity and blockchained.com display.



1411. Post 4108785 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย on December 23, 2013, 07:26:00 PM
Dear Satan, please give us a CHOO CHOO.

Look at the reflection of the guy who took this photo, front part of the hood.

Pretty sure Satan is all about ch000 ch000!





Honestly, id be more interested in seeing a pic of your wife, but I can understand if you decline... Wink



1412. Post 4109374 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Beautiful couple.

Congrats Goat, and Godspeed!



1413. Post 4110901 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: philip2000uk on December 23, 2013, 10:01:57 PM


I'm going to singapore, phil, and maybe thailand in january to find my partner.

This could end in tears if you are not careful. Trying to get this sorted in a month is just asking for trouble.

I spent 8 years in Thailand learning the culture and the language. Anyway, best of luck.
Don't worry it wasn't spontaneous.  I went singapore early this year (3rd time) and already met a filipina friend living there and now she's back in phil looking for work.  I'm going there and then we're going hk and then singapore to see her other family again and then back to phil.   Smiley
The thailand part was just as a holiday and say hello to another friend from facebook who isn't after me at all, infact they are talking to someone else anyway  Smiley

Best of luck!
Thankyou, I don't look for sex so i'm not a bad person, i'm just very lonely and people are nicer there.

Yep, looking for sex would make you such a bad person, on the contrary looking for love makes you sooooo good.

Gotta love the current wildly off topic chat we are having in this thread. "western looking for love in Asia observer thread"??

Poor Blitz.

In other news: everybody so oversold in here...



1414. Post 4111301 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: TERA on December 23, 2013, 10:34:40 PM
I would love to see a bunch of coins dumped like that and see the market return to a fair price fueled by investor demand rather than speculation. If I could get a rock solid price like that which I could feel completely safe with, then I would hold my coins in codl storage and take a break from the exchanges and the charts.

What is a fair price?



1415. Post 4111336 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: esse83 on December 23, 2013, 10:36:00 PM
LOL! Who IS this guy anyway? He seems like a straw man to me... Roll Eyes
http://nypost.com/2013/12/23/government-robbed-me-of-33m-in-bitcoins-silk-road-pirate/

wow, even though he is going to lose, the courts are going to have to make a ruling on it, and more or less claim that btc is property and thus give it all sorts of rights.


pretty cool for btc.


also he more or less admitting to running silk road must mean his case is extremely weak.

http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mhl45efgek/ross-ulbricht-3/

Yeah, his case is not looking solid.

I guess he is at least trying to recoup some money to be able to pay for top dollar lawyers.

He will fail and Bitcoin will get stronger in the process.



1416. Post 4111361 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.45h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on December 23, 2013, 10:37:57 PM
I would love to see a bunch of coins dumped like that and see the market return to a fair price fueled by investor demand rather than speculation. If I could get a rock solid price like that which I could feel completely safe with, then I would hold my coins in codl storage and take a break from the exchanges and the charts.

What is a fair price?

anything less then 10,000$  Cheesy


Mmmmm... I was thinking on $100k?

Cheesy



1417. Post 4143991 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.46h):

Dogecoin is a perfect synthesis of the stupidity of the crypto ecosystem.



1418. Post 4166707 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.47h):

Quote from: manfred on December 27, 2013, 10:51:26 AM
So let me get this straight the raided because some Rs20-30 rupees where traded. One bitcoin currently costs Rs 46600

This made me lol very hard:

No country has legalised Bitcoin as of now because of its opaque nature

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1419. Post 4361238 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_11.52h):

Hi guys, just came back from holidays, how is 2014 treating you? Is this rally "legit" or a bull trap, what's the consensus in here?

What about  repietila? Is he bull or bear now? Need to know to do the opposite he says Smiley



1420. Post 4994065 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

Quote from: mestar on February 07, 2014, 10:42:08 AM
so what do all the people do with the GOX $ now?

I'm guessing withdrawals to Yen are still working.

Not really. Withdrawals problems have spread to all currencies: EUR, JPY, etc.

One importante question arises: WHERE THE FUCK IS KARPELES?



1421. Post 4994342 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.04h):

For the record: I'm buying.

Thank you Gox.



1422. Post 5052317 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

My transfer just hit Bitstamp.

Time to buy, guys!



1423. Post 5052588 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

Go panickers go!!

Bitcoin is amazing. So many profit opportunities.



1424. Post 5053050 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.05h):

I'd love to know how many bitcoins were bought on BTC-E in the $102 to $200 range.

Lucy bastards...



1425. Post 5058435 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: porcupine87 on February 10, 2014, 03:51:22 PM
Bitstamp is back to the niveau before the Gox news Smiley

A lot of pigs got slaughtered.

I'm just wondering if the one who sold 8.5k BTC with a market order on BTC-E taking the price down to $102 is a mentally challenged trader who went full retard or just a poor guy who got his account hacked.

He lost MILLIONS to the lucky bastards that had bids down to $100 on BTC-E. Somebody six-folded his money in a couple of seconds.



1426. Post 5059063 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: MAbtc on February 10, 2014, 04:38:53 PM
Bitstamp is back to the niveau before the Gox news Smiley

A lot of pigs got slaughtered.

I'm just wondering if the one who sold 8.5k BTC with a market order on BTC-E taking the price down to $102 is a mentally challenged trader who went full retard or just a poor guy who got his account hacked.

He lost MILLIONS to the lucky bastards that had bids down to $100 on BTC-E. Somebody six-folded his money in a couple of seconds.

Pretty sure this was a cascade of forced liquidations, not one actor.

Well, 8.5k coins were sold in the same minute. That was either:

a) one single trader going full retard
b) one huge account got hacked
c) multiple accounts were hacked and were liquidated simultaneously

The fact remains that some bastards got HUNDREDS of coins at $102. I guess the risk of having fiat on BTC-E paid off big time.

EDIT: THOUSANDS of coins in the $100-$200 range

The seller/s lost MILLIONS to those who had the low bids.



1427. Post 5059302 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 10, 2014, 04:57:33 PM
New order types coming soon!

what do you mean?

Don't feed the troll pls.



1428. Post 5060639 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: prof7bit on February 10, 2014, 06:08:41 PM
I am talking about leveraged longs. BTC-E is a leverage trading platform via Meta Trader. Pretty sure this was a string of forced liquidations.
They should not allow monstrous leveraged positions to be build up that are larger than their own thin order book, this is just insane.

Exactly.



1429. Post 5061487 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: EuroTrash on February 10, 2014, 06:51:32 PM
There was not nearly enough bid depth to sustain those prices. Two exchanges (finex, BTC-E) got wiped out with a single order.
Many trustworthy. Let´s say some sociopath basement guy with 300k+BTC can do this again a few more times, just for the lulz if he wants.
Keep on hodling Hodlers  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Not in your wildest fantasy.

There is exactly one person in that situation, he is not selling, and never has.

weeeelll...  apart from Satoshi I believe that MP is also in that 300k+ situation

Not even close.

Knightmb might have something close to that.



1430. Post 5062368 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: ElectricMucus on February 10, 2014, 07:36:36 PM
anybody else is unable to withdraw BTC from btc-e?


Here we go again. =)))
I'm pretty sure it's temporary.
lol about this thread catching on now

Wow

Much panic
Many cheap
Very coins

Cheesy



1431. Post 5063772 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: hdbuck on February 10, 2014, 08:51:43 PM
anybody else is unable to withdraw BTC from btc-e?

Working fine for me.

Where have I hear this before?
Small withdrawals working better than large ones?

They had an unusual day. Perhaps their hot wallet is simply empty or something. Don't worry too much just yet.

I don't think so. The withdraw is completed on btc-e but never appeared on the blockchain. the submission  now over 4 hours ago. Other withdraws seem to work as it should.

damn why always me. I hope this is not the beginning of Gox problems.

isnt bitcoin on its way to get 100% illegal in russia anyway? and where is BTC-e from again? do the maths gents..  Roll Eyes
BTC-e is about to be GOXxxed..
Big time Cheesy

edit: although i know there're from bulgaria, still, most of their customers are russians...

You are a retard. And you are probably a retard from the US, as in Europe even the retards know that Bulgaria is NOT Russia.

As a side note, Bulgaria is in the EU - Russia is not.

Please share your source about BTC - Es customers are Russian for the most part.



1432. Post 5064482 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: c0dex on February 10, 2014, 09:22:50 PM
The last few weeks have made me feel as though bitcoin is a long, long, LONG way off from truly mass adoption. If I were a business, no way would I want to introduce this kind of volatility into it. As an individual, it hurts to see just how unstable bitcoin has been lately because one day I have x amount and by the next hour, I might have something worth only a fraction of that investment!

I'm still in, but I see a long road ahead.

You should stop thinking in fiat terms, then.




1433. Post 5066826 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on February 10, 2014, 09:25:53 PM
The last few weeks have made me feel as though bitcoin is a long, long, LONG way off from truly mass adoption. If I were a business, no way would I want to introduce this kind of volatility into it. As an individual, it hurts to see just how unstable bitcoin has been lately because one day I have x amount and by the next hour, I might have something worth only a fraction of that investment!

I'm still in, but I see a long road ahead.

You should stop thinking in fiat terms, then.


Tell that to the super market cashier. Cheesy

Loving the irony, but its hard for me to follow c0dex's line of thinking. He should see bitcoin as a wild gamble, not as an investment. Up to dayte BTC has greatly rewarded those who just bought during the crashes and took some profits during the euphoria. Basic stuff.

This is and has always been a crazy ride, a very pure form of mass psychology at work, you just do not think in your fiat shrinking or you will make mistakes. You just calmly play the game with money you can afford to lose, and the odds than in 12/24 months you will be very good.




1434. Post 5067671 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: magicmexican on February 10, 2014, 11:57:04 PM
Looks like gox is not participating in this little rally :[

Noone wants emptygoxBTC. They're pretty much worthless now that everybody knows that they have been losing coins because of their shitty accounting and amateurish set up.



1435. Post 5068005 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Guys, have you seen how many "mutated" transactions are being broadcasted? Like this one:

https://blockchain.info/es/tx/3d267f22ee8bb9c403c2ad1147f7a438b9cc0831dfc84c8a3968d99c22d1aa19

Somebody is really pushing for cheap coins Cheesy



1436. Post 5068159 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: kurious on February 11, 2014, 12:33:30 AM
its has occurred to me i could offer to sell 1BTC for 2GOXBTC

assuming GOX BTC CODE things still work...

you send me a GOX BTC CODE with 2BTC i send you a real BTC

any takers?

 Cheesy



Just transfered 20k to GOX. CCMF!
Love that cheap coins everywhere.

btw:
Bitcoin is a gamble. Satoshi Dice is a gamble.
GOX has a better return rate. No pain, no gain.


Quote
[Press Release - MtGox] New security features mean that MtGox is worlds most secure exchange.
Tokyo - Tuesday February 10th 2014.
START
Today MtGox(Tibanne ltd.) announced industry beating security features meaning that MtGox is now the worlds most secure Bitcoin exchange. Featuring security measures utilised by National reserves, MtGox now holds Bitcoins in the same fashion as most world central banks. This means that while you can trade on the exchange itself, the newly employed unswerving model of trust means that Bitcoins are held in a secure depository alongside cash reserves so secure that no unauthorised persons may gain access.
Speaking on the matter, MtGox's CEO Mark Karpeles stated that he had been inspired by PHP and central banking: "We knew that PHP could do anything, our wallet software had proven this beyond a doubt, so we started to ask if PHP could implement a central banking reserve type system. We were delighted with the results. This means that no-one can ever steal our customers money."
MtGox is delighted to announce that all customers will now receive this feature free of charge. This will mean that all funds will be secure in their permanent position meeting both Chinese and US regulatory requirements. MtGox expects that the US Treasury will release a statement later today in support of MtGox's new security technology. Customers should remain assured that MtGox will still accept deposits despite the new security features.
END

CCMF!!! Gox is best!
Erm, if that's a genuine gox statement, it seems odd that they got the date wrong.

Source please?

Are you joking? That's clearly a fake. And it's hilarious Smiley



1437. Post 5076111 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: pietje on February 11, 2014, 11:50:45 AM
Looks like btc-e problems are solved already.
Maybe bitstamp is doing a wallet update too, just to make sure the double spend doesnt happen at their side?

And cryptsy is just being cryptsy.

Well, every single transaction I've broadcasted today has been "mutated". Its pretty harmless for regular users, but its pretty annoying to have so many unconfirmed transactions on the client... I guess the annoyance is even bigger for the exchanges who broadcast thousands of transactions.



1438. Post 5079240 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: Le Happy Merchant on February 11, 2014, 02:43:36 PM
so a question arises: what if mtgox was right, and bitcoin foundation was wrong saying that bitcoin protocol is ok?

I give this scenario a 1:10000 odds at best. But if it is true, then prepare for a shitstorm.

Guys. Just think. I'm getting most of my transactions "malleated" right now, so what? The original transactions never confirm, but the "malleated" ones do and they are registered correctly by Bitcoin-QT. You just see all your transactions twice, one is confirmed and the other will never be, so what? Balance is displayed correctly by QT because the standard implementation handles correctly malleated transactions.

Its just a visual annoyance, as now unconfirmed/doubled transaction pile up on the UI, but apart from that visual annoyance nothing is happening.

Try yourself. Send a couple of transactions and you will see.



1439. Post 5079524 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.06h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 11, 2014, 03:33:02 PM
I'm getting most of my transactions "malleated" right now, so what? The original transactions never confirm, but the "malleated" ones do and they are registered correctly by Bitcoin-QT. You just see all your transactions twice, one is confirmed and the other will never be, so what? Balance is displayed correctly by QT because the standard implementation handles correctly malleated transactions.

What could be the motivations of whoever is doing this?  

To exploit an MtGOX-like bug on any exchange or system that may happen to have such a bug?

There's no "exploit" unless you use a custom software that uses "transaction ID's" as the only element to check transaction, and then you let someone to "social engineer" you by making you believe they never received the money you sent them.

If you use the reference implementation (bitcoind/Bitcoin-QT) your wallet will show BOTH transactions (the "malleated" and the original one) and will display the CORRECT balance, so there is really no way for you to be social engineered. If you use a custom implementation that only cares about txid, then probably the "malleated" transaction won't show up in your client/accounting system, leaving the door open to a social engineering attack.

TL;DR: whoever is trying to "malleate" as many transactions as possible is doing it either for shit and giggles, either for trying to spread some panic among novices and thus induce panic selling.




1440. Post 5096560 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

The market is reacting VERY maturely to a "major" issue: despite of devs trying to underestimate the transaction malleability thing, the hard cold fact is that this "limitation" is being exploited right now to launch a DoS attack to the network which is slowing down (if not outright halting) the bitcoin economy. I've been sending coins to quite a few services for testing purposes (Bitstamp, Dgex, etc.) and all of my transfer were "mutated" and thus the coins were sent to the correct destination but they weren't credited to the corresponding accounts. Most transactions are delayed and big players such as Bitstamp, Gox or Coinbase are having problems tracking correctly the transactions.

Still BTC is trading well above $600 everywhere but Gox. This is a sign of strength in my book. Be prepared to buy, guys, because the network will come out MUCH stronger after this issue is solved.



1441. Post 5098961 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on February 12, 2014, 12:15:06 PM
Here is a little contrarian hope for those of you who feel like sitting ducks:

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-bitcoin-a-new-rip-20140211,0,1065852.story
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-11/the-glitch-that-will-kill-bitcoin.html

This one time, Bitcoin is dying for sure. Cheesy Cheesy

So... This time is different?



1442. Post 5119640 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.07h):

Quote from: seljo on February 13, 2014, 01:22:48 PM
Sorry if this is a repost;
http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/02/jp-morgan-bitcoin-is-vastly-inferior-to-traditional-fiat-currency/
So a combined attack on BTC price from all sources  Undecided

Attack? This is uber-bullish. If JP Morgan had to write a detailed report in order to shit on BTC it means they are pooping their pants. They are seriously concerned.

Great.



1443. Post 5129107 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

Quote from: BitAddict on February 13, 2014, 10:20:53 PM
Here they tell "only" 4,474 bitcoins were stolen. Not 40,000-80,000 like Forbes says.

http://www.deepdotweb.com/2014/02/13/silk-road-2-hacked-bitcoins-stolen-unknown-amount/


What do you think?

4,000 coins is the sum of all the transactions published by the alleged sr2 admin:

http://www.reddit.com/r/DarkNetMarkets/comments/1xtqty/sr_has_been_hacked/

40k - 80k its completely unrealistic IMO. And there is no way this isn't an inside job.



1444. Post 5129247 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

I will quote it for you:

Quote
I summed the balances of all the addresses given and the total is 4083 BTC. Note that the bulk of the addresses have not respent the coins. They're still sitting there.

17SzZX9rH1iXASraKC1yPxMZZN6utdmdEU 65
1LgdR7EdjuUyBkSgLXS7K5Viur4gPbcMMq 50
12HujhGQqPMvb9Jeip5uSEzcUtuLKf31wd 20
17SzZX9rH1iXASraKC1yPxMZZN6utdmdEU 65
16unhdR3bctU2b5zTcek1dT4iiaWDKPHkE 20
13NizDxGnt44bhvMJpttqB7ghfkerb9WUQ 40
18HBFs5b5RapzPsuHTXD8cGKkwKDpQDhjm 40
14UKFvvSH7i1mWdV5yh1Qke9iTVw5LyGfL 5
15k24ojcgUyZUWYP47ZSLn9UiUpmBmCiE1 9
1C2qqRaDHGbTHeEa29p3QruyUKusYDMCb9 40
18ozftq32S4ppV5tPLtg7Eb12GJt8j2B34 105 1CiP8nogPqGGg9e3sG2pGFYW8VP1ZYS7Rg 15
16MrSPHa7VyijtLzGR4hW5u36gEeM3MvY3 80
1BddfHQ5Cpbj8qJbCSG7QbGWCcPwsnCb7c 50
12ch7R9XfVHqNKgfZquKh9op6jX6roJEpq 100 1C8g81dNnr3hB2oNrndVqr3S7MT4WEA6QW 20
1ParuUdUSA8d67gbEB4Kg3KRKkAhaCSvJL 60
1EJsQd9UkxhZgFe1VK7BrRaK5xkdpcA87Z 120 1DkLC5Mx1kURm85z8x6mEBgy1n2qdtVZYJ 20
16AX4seGVjNnWacnJ8AZsUursiYSyiwtgw 140 1JsovjjKmnaHTfTrpfVxDb6Yh2xy9gEj8a 40
1HCioA4BHa145HRfaDQWc6LeoffPAec7SS 50
1LGacK7gWXTs5ArU7M6iJcKFS7gVWRKjHc 50
1Kvu4DdcP1D3jUjWRVGqkkfqmxo5XxdwP7 50
1ArQnUQ2AELxGsbsxUL5nyJR3bDHUQ5wGG 100 1J1SsZhNYpkAXQASQvMtXn2pNZemMTLcyg 50
12hvgXTp3DUmAgXaTTxUdo3HBDkm6YseLa 100 1JZQUweCPZ7GiHJEeubM8QN4KeEc1YaHx6 100 1LuqpcnHjPiqXfuup3Va2BaME62XmJ4YrG 50
18NiWUntmeENHwj4ob7qkzJmmYGibgSiXk 150 14Xvk4SGhuMgA9uKXT7ZquZn3ZCC5MxKTQ 50
177nm9GfFkAJaH2vCyELBCR6LqhT7xLw2y 50
13e7UWTS9HxRhJAnqLSr2tjonv3oLpH7Sa 50
1EG7ZnAWMBo7cAFyUj2UcDQTfUbtMY5KvN 50
1B7k666iHqk97PuLfPDGs9FjQsEXrCLWHw 150 1PcbSbXVjTvMp4x8ygR8cYqyYYeJq3GUio 50
1Eh4C3HAH59znaHpXMVe78yE8bmRVYjgiY 100 17jZ4PhDRKhjwApAufHGLHuuLhnCGgvjq 150 16sS6bZsWradvU6xAPUo4yLQpwny9M1DaY 50
13L1oDCkX6gxWJSb22eVCNzQtqUvhTLRoJ 20
135uPmygCVpg3ZmfjcR6j2jVAXdzsPqQdX 20
1N8KzExU1ED7FiCH9jrxCWZqKq2HVKfCGo 20
16MKh4ddiFW4rSTkUHS5KcfiXMaZYQoXxQ 20
1Nmnf1Ts3Vt2KQGyrk1bRfPYm1ynGBY51k 20
1EHDktYWndYD28par5UkcaX1NTLWyriqMd 20
1GoYtgUYvjrzGZ2E2kfDhGKWU4zuudAeiT 40
1G4V55pbrXoMCtLf397R7jRfVQMQY2hfji 20
1LoUgHwUdBAVQ7wM6bWEC45gvKKBJiAWvZ 20
1Ft6y8G12Jxm9CRrC3i2K52LNXUrtDnQ1h 40
13mqPJfyLr12oppTw8MsJCFCFTYQtTRv5S 20
17QjCEe684QstCiPwEAbCXJZXugTGgDq3z 60
14PCxnkLYJuuBcB4wBEN9TMLuSEiPswhya 20
1DWqiF4EfR7e41zpn1bNFpYkAR7GXkLwNY 20
1AUUU3SvmfhkgG5kJ8WBGHAAqu1FjVxWmo 20
16QANrRBgnPS6Rxn3Hv6TM9hcqQfDfBiRx 20
1gb86NwHy59hHk4JHAjViWnm3XJY7kLEh 20
17SZF9Lubvf4DqfbDSLff9MjjDMsjovqoB 20
1LtztZqdopyCjHbKFmU5crTHZdzYGoGYtp 40
18wjbhmiP2qRcWpUJpHgzoX2rU97HmdZ1g 20
1DE3fdxtyKddcLq2Axzvj5AcY6VvackdTW 20
1BM3PegVERdzizHxtfejjQQjdLjGbzw2a4 20
1FWeK4Pnf8v6mHyuHzvitNGUpndppt5prx 20
1HK6nM9Mh5Snso7EtxTyhT3KqwaR3Xe4PF 60
15bRgN9M3oBxMG6ehFm55FZHGZxWwtHaqQ 40
16fb3jD6U43j4XvG5JFuBwPaiGDJ13SfvE 20
1L2itur2cWf3RxEBLcMiyfMPgpjT8x5eMq 20
1PsMooLuaRfbFDs3EdrMnvCGSaTwviLdzi 20
17EDU3Q7FFBPc5QkNpSX1BX8BUSzKMgSxA 20
1BBPbfWDrMNJ9gKEhThyejdPARzhPYbUAo 20
17avKh1xVuQ7agfWAgzPybgaRnidjC64gV 20
1K4S6mzPWfCDZnSVRQ7CQg4qedwpMnP7Rs 20
15DpDxAbogeRuX29Af2Gb3dSwx4BMPrJ7W 20
1P7XJhZrYSrwv1xfPjWS9nMe77hrWT2pDV 40
19Z5V8Xvx9QGFpcEArh19WpCNuUbRyzJ8U 40
1PxQGeVyjZAX9R9ZSP5C3i6cs2vWUE2Hgg 20
1DPPP9PS5ED2GfYEccvybaXWNZuQQH9L7s 20
1CsCFkUAzKkdr2dHRWZMwDRar5aKEx23aP 20
19AWRF2PBQJzMtvA9ZbuvH6hRRshdrVAsm 20
16ZZYJ1boaCGKK3ej2kZJJNEtA22t9bGrD 40
12oAaLTybszVcEH1FAibJ2qy7dthjdwwHy 20
1CKipZk8mhsPNpTCzmfkD3hgHczaWSCr1a 20
1BQwb68dMzukaTa9X19XmcSzjifwrygEfc 20
1FEP3aGSib3oHFYQk9pPCAXdyBAUnLqKse 20
1Fn3BwCbMjfJsnxKTuXu6R96W32YgBSHjT 20
1BkeGMVkTovRkq6MXmjUJTDYAWtUMN2gQc 20
1Mgc86sMy2xru5vYqzoYUNCwcqk6wYwa7Y 20
17JakmrmbasfizzchxBbu3wxqC2tkxsWtJ 20
1FSPU8s2jqn6pc5Gxx7Yvgq46EGfwb6uC2 100 1P2hyU3kDZurZC6XprrsWVoM95tjNP2gnD 20
1D9YhoGNZEoPAfKZ8weW9kz7W3ugsc315e 20
1JgZZSEsyZy6hGGUMopPoWfvKanh9vLyrn 20
14Nj1reU9t9fjhFiowrkuke6mzH2xQSPhg 20
12G2qaL8FvdBfLg4rySwSdWnCuxpFtTLvU 20
1C8NbELiwAt7ARqLhoBNDL3UV2Ak59RmQ1 20
1PvZXNXLxuk5FmEGbiSdDYu8NeEQ93jwRw 20
13rxE2hXuoEU7DzyrHJU15UgxHJG4k1vX5 5
12jgHhuceGTeayUrtc9pM3SYgS4FXbJUqi 5
1NF8yoLM39NFAZvDErzCQyA1ycy2YybA4L 10
1Ci42oM3RRD7xrETosGvNAx9mNyqog2f2p 0.002
1GYFhG6EJt6oY4T2QtLrHwnYKHDJ6Zd6aR 5
1QEsRuuifLAFbRtCkaaoetUjFSMLDBtqyV 20
13RDPyqMgm81KXkEoN7wZ89zQ5BgQY6oVv 20 spent 1J2CGwyMcpgmCHtq2qsR9sTskcvhGFm5S4 20 spent 1GSaUL3NqoPRXkfeLcDWYAADJMtP9mqfEa 15 spent 1JWHEnQP4YG4xFEiSTT5mBDLgUn849128H 10 spent 1EWPTduyZDYnbhg9EPN1GooegjQ1BWuhJ3 10 spent 1NJPLMzggPhCNfNW9BuKU1BH2HdhZGs7Kk 10 spent 1CPz9VtxWiiozUEJR1ampUWrJUD9EQTuWA 9 spent 12tAjfrsVKjhisKmFm8wHRDQQsbA5BwaLU 4.22388017 spent 1MEQJqUfBWrWTPEdEpQGdQVPUN9abeTYe5 0.19658503 spent 1Lm4C1VdGi2UgvYRjhTfMcbWPCKZUyQDX4 0.4082114 spent 1MJa5pFmcZV6hCSBXwZdUe2iaguHPnJvfS 4.62537481 spent 1GYFhG6EJt6oY4T2QtLrHwnYKHDJ6Zd6aR 0.62399438 spent 1Jy722KX7mAqqPp47a8WxN7NpUZvMoZur2 1.05715336 spent 1NPvYm1WMobdrKBrj7ETnRvNV6kHMABot8 1 spent 1Fkzww2b9RDSaUbpgDfGpmu2vGhrjWeJjL 5.67 spent 1KPn8KKzUaSV7mvQp55xWFvToXUeNdsanD 3.9 spent 1DGy63xb3urJBqqpxXHwziHdf5F6M7n5n6 0.37 spent 1JE4Sy7RY18Vv6j6zUdDiNigAo2D46Nqum 2.6 spent 13bZnPfcZAa97RvtQ7xDveE85PYsdXNnHT 0.01 spent



1445. Post 5129277 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.08h):

in the meanwhile, fiat is vanishing from Gox's order book




1446. Post 5137704 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

It's official: 50% spread between Gox and Bitstamp.

Absolute record.

If Gox resumes withdrawals with no problem, the sellers will have had HUGE losses, and the buyers HUGE gains.

Interesting times.



1447. Post 5139618 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.09h):

Quote from: 600watt on February 14, 2014, 12:10:16 PM
gotta give credit to the stamp hodlers. showing us 644 in the midst of this turmoil is impressive.


You are welcome Wink

Quote from: seljo on February 14, 2014, 12:29:55 PM
I just sent some fiat to gox am I insane?  Huh

You did well. It's an acceptable risk IMO.



1448. Post 5242204 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: wpalczynski on February 19, 2014, 06:48:38 PM
+1 Wow... you are really an early adopter.  Congrats!

Especially those who reserved a couple million bitcoins for themselves at the beginning, and thus (like the "me" in my parable) have invested nothing and will walk out with a fortune.

Satoshi invested NOTHING? He only invested his/their lifetime to learning to code, learning about currency and cryptography. He invested his intelligence, reputation, time and money into creating software for the entire world to use freely. If he invested nothing into Bitcoin then you invested nothing in becoming a University Professor.

Once he created the software he mined <4000 coins (80 blocks @ 50BTC reward, basically testing the software) before releasing it to the world. Note this was several years before 10,000 coins would even buy a pizza. Satoshi risked the cost of his electricity to mine worthless "ledger coins."

"When Satoshi announced the first release of the software, I grabbed it right away. I think I was the first person besides Satoshi to run bitcoin. I mined block 70-something, and I was the recipient of the first bitcoin transaction, when Satoshi sent ten coins to me as a test. I carried on an email conversation with Satoshi over the next few days, mostly me reporting bugs and him fixing them." - Hal Finney, on block number
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=155054.0

I'm generously using 80 since Hal's "70-something" could be 79. Other sources claim blocks as early as 12 may have been mined by others: http://bitslog.wordpress.com/2013/04/24/satoshi-s-fortune-a-more-accurate-figure/

Original block reward was 50 coins:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bitcoin

And of course Satoshi continued mining after that. It was his project afterall. In the beginning if he didn't use it, who would? The rewards came fast back then and he accumulated many before apparent stopping. It is believed his stash is unspent but who knows for sure, and why would it matter? He deserves every penny for his innovation.

No. Read again. Hal Finney is.




1449. Post 5242236 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: jojo69 on February 19, 2014, 06:48:45 PM
the butthurt of late adopters is sweet, sweet nectar

True from one side, but pretty annoying to see how they keep repeating over and over the same "arguments" that have been used (and debunked) since the mid-2011 crash.




1450. Post 5242442 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: OldGeek on February 19, 2014, 06:51:57 PM
It is my understanding that a lot (most?) of the regulars here have fonzie on ignore (I don’t ignore anyone) so I won’t quote him, but he actually made a non-trolly post a few pages ago (his post was in the midst of the barbequing of Jorge).  He, fonzie, has a misunderstanding, but it is worth exploring for the benefit of those new to our tech coin.

The essential point of the post by fonzie was that it shouldn’t matter what the current exchange price for XBT is.  He used the $1 - $100 figures.  And, to be fair, he’s right that the protocol will work as well with a value of one cent or ten thousand dollars.  But, the protocol works best if there are many, distributed, nodes who individually test and verify the contents of the blocks.

The biggest problem, fonzie, is that at $100 per coin, many miners will unplug their equipment.  Granted the vast majority of them will be small hashraters like me, but I believe that a good percentage of the larger miners will examine their hole cards and shut down too.  If that is true then you would be left with the very largest miners in control of the blockchain and that may or may not be a good thing.  The arguments against consolidation of mining can be found in other sub-fora so I don’t need to get into that except to say that I personally think it would not end well.

As a day trader one need not be overly concerned by the current price, only the direction and velocity matters.  As a miner, the USD 700 level seems to be about the minimum level for (my) continuing operations.  A little below that can be subsidized out-of-pocket for a short period.  Much below that and the decision to unplug is easy.  In my case, if the exchange price goes below $500, and stays there for a month, then I will have made my choice.  Newer miners, with more expensive equipment, may reach their magic number sooner.

So, fonzie, I submit that the price does matter.




What gear r u using? My 28nm ASICs would be profitable even below $100. And for those manufacturing their own gear, probably even below $20.



1451. Post 5245839 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Anybody else noticed that Jorge is a sort of rpietila antagonist?



1452. Post 5246033 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: MANofthePEOPLE on February 19, 2014, 10:18:32 PM
Why are people taking huge dumps on bitstamp?

early arb? insider trading?

welcome to btc



1453. Post 5246439 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 19, 2014, 10:30:54 PM
Winklevii price index:
http://winkdex.com/#/

Nice find. When did this to live?



1454. Post 5246579 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 19, 2014, 10:50:42 PM
Winklevii price index:
http://winkdex.com/#/

Nice find. When did this to live?

Today I think.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/02/19/before-a-bitcoin-fund-comes-a-price-index/

Did you check the "about us"? Their biographies are exactly the same WORD BY WORD. It's like they are one person with two bodies, no unique experiences or motivations or whatever.

Quote
CAMERON WINKLEVOSS
Chief Executive Officer
@WINKLEVOSS

Cameron Winklevoss is a long-term investor in Bitcoin and other emerging technologies. In 2004, he graduated from Harvard University with an A.B. in Economics. In 2010, Mr. Winklevoss received a Masters of Business Administration from the Saďd Business School at the University of Oxford. Mr. Winklevoss represented the United States at the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, China.
TYLER WINKLEVOSS
President
@TYLERWINKLEVOSS

Tyler Winklevoss is a long-term investor in Bitcoin and other emerging technologies. In 2004, he graduated from Harvard University with an A.B. in Economics. In 2010, Mr. Winklevoss received a Masters of Business Administration from the Saďd Business School at the University of Oxford. Mr. Winklevoss represented the United States at the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, China.

How fucking creepy is that?



1455. Post 5246827 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.13h):

EuroTrash: it looks extremely creepy to me, not funny at all. It looks very deranged to me...

But I guess it's just a matter of tastes



1456. Post 5263298 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Amazed by the amount of people saying they don't use 2FA.

Seriously guys, WTF? How difficult is to download Google Auth on your phone and to set up the 2FA on your exchange account?

Why do you try so hard to be the low-hanging fruit and thus to be hacked?

WHY???




1457. Post 5263844 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: johnny211 on February 20, 2014, 05:35:51 PM
Amazed by the amount of people saying they don't use 2FA.

Seriously guys, WTF? How difficult is to download Google Auth on your phone and to set up the 2FA on your exchange account?

Why do you try so hard to be the low-hanging fruit and thus to be hacked?

WHY???

I guess i'm not the only one who worries about losing the phone and doesn't really know how to keep backups of the 2FA stuff properly.

Really? That's like saying that you leave the door of your house open just in case you lose your keys. Again: WTF?

Backing up a 2FA token is the easiest thing in the world: when you set it up, you get a secret code in both numeric form and as a handy QR code. You just print that page, and you keep it together with your important documents.

It's really as easy as it gets.



1458. Post 5264722 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.14h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on February 20, 2014, 06:35:32 PM
Do you have any proof of sending 50k to mtgox? This is not speculation is throwing money off the window. You might win, but still it's stupid to do.


Did you make that deposit today and got it in instantly?
Yes I made this today and it should arrive tomorrow based on my previous transactions. It takes about 1 business day for money to arrive.

Well done. You will probably buy more than 500 BTC with that amount.. If Gox can pull their shit together you will be looking at a huge instant profit.

In other news: my concern is not Gox being insolvent "because they lost the coins". My concerns is they are in VERY deep shit for various reasons and funds might be stuck in there for very long.

EUR withdrawals still worked you say? Only smallish ones and VERY slowly. When it takes 6 weeks to process a fiat withdrawal, then something VERY bad is happening. I mean... If I tell to my bank to do a 300k transfer, they do it immediately, and in max. 2/3 days the money arrives to the account where I sent it. If they have to wait WEEKS to be able to send the money, then there is a serious problem somewhere. They won't tell us what is the problem and they make up BS excuses about their "huge volume" overwhelming the banks. In my book, that's very worrying.



1459. Post 5277474 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 21, 2014, 06:16:14 AM
OK, again, here is what I would do if I had to safely store several hundred thousand bitcoins that my clients gave me for safekeeping. 

First, I would create a dozen new addresses and distribute the bitcoins evenly among them.  I do not believe in trapdoor functions, and I know what NSA did to that random number generator; so I instead of any "modern" encryption I would use the old and guaranteed one-time-pad method. I would generate a file of truly random bits (say, extracted from the microphone signal), and XOR it with the private keys.  Then I would copy the result to a pen drive, check that the copy succeded, safely remove the pendrive (see, I learned my lesson!) I would repeat with a second pendrive and give it to my partner.  Then each of us would go to a different bank, on separate cars, and store his pendrive in a safe deposit box. Only then I would go back and reformat the hard drive of my computer.


Do I really need to add the "stupid smiley" here?)

Wow, this is one of the most retarded things I've ever read. And no, its not funny.

Jorge, why are you trying so hard to embarass yourself? Is this your way to learn?

On a serious note: if you need to safely store bitcoins in an exchange-like setup were they also need to be readily available for withdrawal you just use a hot+cold wallet solution based on Armory. Full stop.



1460. Post 5277601 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):




1461. Post 5282989 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: Davyd05 on February 21, 2014, 03:18:53 PM
Today on #bitcoin

gmaxwell: wumpus: yea, I understand they had timed automatic reissues... Sad this was also something I didn't know prior to monday before last and is one of the other reasons my "they couldn't have lost much!" position softened to "I have no freeking clue."
alpha125: gmaxwell: where did you find out abotu the automatic reissues?
gmaxwell: alpha125: from mtgox staff and magicaltux ... I had assumed previously that any reissues were manual via customer support but apparently it was just timed.
gmaxwell: you'll also note that they've kept increasing their fees and then even mad paying fees mandatory.
gmaxwell: This suggested to me that they totally misunderstood their problems. (and— I reported that I believed this months ago too)
gmaxwell: e.g. they noticed lots of txn getting stuck, they didn't understand it was because they were producing invalid txn (even though it was reported to them) and so they thought it was just 'full blocks'
gmaxwell: and they increased their fees from 0.0001 to 0.0005 — which was enough to may more than virtually every txn— and then later to 0.001 which is basically astronomic. And then they made it mandatory.
gmaxwell: of course their stalled txn had nothing to do with fees.

Edit: Just to clarify, only quoted relevant parts (maybe I should have inserted "[...]" where applicable). Full text here: http://pastebin.com/DaSph9uT

that and its an unverified pastebin

I can verify that pastebin. I witnessed that discussion live on #bitcoin (Freenode). It's legit.



1462. Post 5285832 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 21, 2014, 04:38:45 PM
He did not store his one-time-pad which was on the hard-drive that was later formatted. Or at least did not mention it.

Yes.  

The point of that "stupid joke" was to point out how easily a tiny mistake can turn a strong security scheme into an epic disaster.

The mutlibillion-dollar accident at Three Mile Island began with a faulty safety valve in a redundant part of the cooling system.  The "tiny mistake" was that the corresponding light in the control panel did not show whether the valve was actually closed, but only whether it had been commanded to close.

I am sure there are better examples in computer security but I don't recall one right now.


This is just mental masturbation. Do you need to secure a lot of bitcoins, while still operating recursively with them? THEN YOU USE ARMORY. It's built for that, and it's idiot-proof. Your private keys are backed up by n-of-M paper backups, and you can operate easily by:


What you have written is just pointless. I guess you have too much time to lose, and instead of learning by READING you want to learn by participating in here.



 



1463. Post 5286394 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: aminorex on February 21, 2014, 06:21:40 PM
I think Jorge's point that logical systems are brittle is well-taken.  They are also robust, within their domain.  Some are provably correct.  Others have extensive stress testing which gives us high confidence in them.  Many are not provably correct.  Many have little stress testing.  Often even very well designed systems have usability flaws which increase the likelihood of operator error resulting in risk or outright harm.

All of which is completely off-topic, but then this is the de facto off-topic thread, and I resemble that remark.

In any case, the primary point I take from that discussion is that one should try to cover for other's errors, in order to be an effective cooperator.  




Well, I kinda feel bad now for being so harsh with Jorge - he really seems a nice guy, and for sure its much better to have him in here than the other thousands trolls that are flooding this forum since October.

What is kinda annoying of him IMO is that he clearly has a lack of understanding of fundamental things linked to Bitcoin, and instead of silently reading and learning what was discussed in the past and try to complement that, he just spits the same old arguments that have been discussed (and debunked) thousands of times before.

Practical example: the "ponzi scheme" thing. We already had an intellectual/economist on the forum who explained us many times and with Jorge's very same words how Bitcoin was a ponzi on the verge of collapse: his moment of glory was during the crash of 2011, and he went to great lengths to explain how Bitcoin was a zero-sum game in which early adopters were assraping late adopters. He cheered with joy during the crash from $32 to $2, but we all know how that played out: the "bag-holders" as he called them (did you think you invented that word, Jorge?) are now holding a bag worth hundreds of times more it was worth during this infamous character's rants. The name of this guy is John Nagle, and you can find his profile here and here a nice web with which he embarassed himself.

And BTW, Mr. Stelfi: please point to us an example of a ponzi scheme which has seen 3 different "boom and bust" cycles in which price deflated as much as it did with Bitcoin, to then recover in such a way as Bitcoin did. Just FYI:

2011: $32 to $2 (-94%)
mid-2013: $266 to $50 (-81%)
late 2013: $1242 to $400ish (-68%)

Maybe because BTC is not a "zero-sum game", or a "ponzi" or a "bubble", despite that's what its critics have said of it from its very inception. Maybe there's much more to it than its mere utility as money, maybe (and only maybe) the distributed blockchain is the promise of a revolution that brings an increased freedom for the people.

I'm afraid that to see that you probably have to look deeper into it.



1464. Post 5297213 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.15h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 22, 2014, 04:35:47 AM
Ditto for the claim that Governments cannot stop bitcoin.

It must be a semantics issue which you're hung up on with regard to this issue. Governments cannot stop Bitcoin. They can ban it or otherwise criminalize it but that won't stop it from being used. I guess the only way we'd know is to give it a whirl.

My definition of "success" is "it is used by many people for ordinary payments because it is cheaper/faster/safer than using a bank or credit card". That will not happen if it illegal to use it.  

Since december, even a foreign tourist cannot pay for a hotel bill or meal in China with bitcoin.  So the bitcoin project is already dead in China.

The Chinese government still allows trading inside the exchanges only because they feel that it is harmless. If they saw a threat there, they could easily close the exchanges, and block access to the network if necessary.  

Again, I do not see how the blockchain could be maintained if the US government decided to ban bitcoin.

You really understood nothing on Bitcoin if you thought that its success depends on a random Chinese being able to pay for his meal with it. Nothing.

First, Bitcoin was never meant to be a system with which consumers all over the world recurrently pay for meals or other day by day expenses. It simply does not scale. Remember it is blockchain based, and thus "heavy" and relatively "slow".  Many people in the world are not able to pay for their meals with gold: so what?

Secondly, the revolutionary aspect of Bitcoin is that it CANNOT be killed. You see how hard has tried the US to kill torrent, and how that played out? Even if there is a global ban, the protocol cannot be blocked effectively, (everybody should already be running Bitcoin through Tor anyway), and even if "they" (banks and govs) manage to destroy the last exchange on earth, OTC would still happen and probably a big part of the global black market would embrace Bitcoin as a consequence of this global ban. Bitcoins would still hold a value - we all know what kind of markups we have on illegal things.

Bitcoin's core values (decentralized and trustless) would remain un scattered in this global ban scenario . You seem to do not understand the huge implications of these two core characteristics of this game changing technology. In these times of surveillance, globalization and centralization, a technology like Bitcoin will simply NOT go away because it is SO important and SO empowering.

Probably the difference between you and us is that you are thinking in purely economical terms. Even in that case, it's pretty strange that you compare Bitcoin to a Ponzi or a bubble when there has been NO ponzis and NO bubbles in history that have behaved like Bitcoin. That argument could have been valid in mid-2011, now it's just a ridiculous way to embarrass yourself. Shoe me a "bubble" which have gone through three phases as Bitcoin did, with similar appreciation and deflation in each one of the phases, and I might listen. You will find none, because that's not how bubbles/ponzis work: they go up uP UP until they crash flat to the floor, to never recover.

But remember, Bitcoin is much more than a speculative vehicle or a micro-payment network. Bitcoin is freedom, and it's also a way to say fuck off to the establishment, regardless of the regulations/bans that might been put in place.

Don't underestimate that.



1465. Post 5313572 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 22, 2014, 10:37:20 PM
I just learned a story about a 'bitcoin investment fund' in a certain Latin American country.  The fund took several thousand coins from clients,  promising large returns in BTC.  Then the owner claimed that the fund had been hacked an all the coins were stolen, and closed the fund.  The clients have not yet received their coins back.

What makes the story interesting is that that same person is the owner of that country's main bitcoin exchange.  And his clients see nothing wrong with that.

Why is there so much tolerance to dishonesty in the bitcoin community?


Are you speaking about Mercado Bitcoin in Brazil, right?

Well, I personally know the people involved and you are just making wild assumptions. AFAIK the theft of the fund money happened indeed - and the owner of the fund is the OLD owner of the exchange, not the actual one. He sold it.

So, you are reading stories in a forum, confusing them for hard cold facts and then making assumptions. Well done, professor. You are embarrassing  yourself again.

About your stupid rhetorical question:in the Bitcoin community there is no more tolerance to dishonesty than in the "fiat community" (lol). HSBC employees and management can calmly walk down the streets without fearing to encounter an angry mob ready to hang them from a tree (same thing is valid for any of the investment banks that made millions of people poorer after the 2008 crisis), Berlusconi has ruled 20 years in Italy while all the population knows he is a thief and probably a "wise guy", the management of the Spanish banks that ruined the country and that had to be rescued with public money is walking away with multi-million bonuses while nobody says nothing, and the vast majority of financial criminals (even the convicted ones) are admired and called "sir" by their neighbors.

This is capitalism, Mr Steffi, and there's always tolerance to making a lot of money, regardless of the means.



1466. Post 5315663 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on February 23, 2014, 09:53:10 AM
The horrible realization from people who sold near double digits that mtgoxUSD is actually as bad, if not worse, than mtgoxBTC. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

GoxBTC is superior to GoxUsd - no doubt about it.



1467. Post 5315973 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.16h):

Gox is making a huge amount of fees during the manic trading that has been going on since the BTC withdrawal issue.

Especially in BTC. Karpeles is smiling.

Pigs are being slaughtered very hard this time. GoxBTC at $100ish was a HUGE deal. I really cannot understand those who sold near double digits.



1468. Post 5333833 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

THAT 5k coins wall on Bitstamp...




1469. Post 5334526 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.17h):

Quote from: TERA on February 24, 2014, 10:23:15 AM
I'm suprised there haven't been more of these types of walls all along. They used to be normal, and then disappeared in July. The mtgox orderbook used to have 200K COINS on it during bear markets. Bitstamp currently has only roughly 20K coins. If Bitstamp is becoming the major exchange and then rest of the exchanges are either dying off or being proven to have fake volume, then I should expect bitstamp to be at least somewhat more like mtgox used to be. For example 80K coins on the book might be appropriate.

coins are worth 10x what they used to be....
This statement (in and of itself) is not enough to tell me why there would be less coins on order books. The value of the coins does not change the amount of coins in circulation.  Look at this chart (green and yellow): In both corrections of 2012 and in the correction of 2013, there were the same amount of coins on the book, even though the value was increasing by 5x each time. It would probably be similar in 2011 if I could find that too.  Now look at 2014. Suddenly there is an order of magnitude less coins. I would attribute this to exchange diversification and gox dying (this started all the way back in June 2013). However, if Bitstamp is becoming the biggest and most well respected exchange then it should have more than 20K. Even with exchange diversification , Bitstamp should have at least 50K. In any case, the valuation of the coins is an irrelevant argument.




In early 2011  it was not uncommon to see a single 200k coins wall - in 2012 a 20k wall was so common that nothing below that amount was even considered a "wall".

Right now 1k coin is considered a "wall" - albeit a small one - and rightfully so, as the value of the coins has skyrocketed.

You also seem to forget tht in 2011, 2012 and 2013 MtGox was THE exchange - Gox handled 90% of the market. Now Gox is 30/40% of the market at best, therefore to have a more accurate figure of the total coins on sale and compare it to the past you should add Bitstamp's and Gox's order books.



1470. Post 5338912 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: ChrisML on February 24, 2014, 03:18:56 PM
25K BTC volume on Bitcoinbuilder.

the owner of that website is making MILLIONS just by having a website and "guaranteeing" the trades. He processes them manually. He makes 2% on each trade, on both sides of the trade.

Even for bitcoin standards, this is an astonishing easy way of becoming a fucking millionaire.

I bet he is praying for Gox stalling the situation indefinitely Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



1471. Post 5339203 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on February 24, 2014, 03:36:44 PM
25K BTC volume on Bitcoinbuilder.

the owner of that website is making MILLIONS just by having a website and "guaranteeing" the trades. He processes them manually. He makes 2% on each trade, on both sides of the trade.

Even for bitcoin standards, this is an astonishing easy way of becoming a fucking millionaire.

I bet he is praying for Gox stalling the situation indefinitely Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

He is doing a pretty good job so far. The payouts are on time, the trades are nearly instant. Can't complain so far.
Guess not everybody is that lucky. Payout not on time, critical bug leaving my balance in minus and no reply to support tickets for close to 48 hours. But he is making good money, no doubt about that.

Kozi, I miss your animated gifs. And I really miss your musical videos. Really.



1472. Post 5339658 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on February 24, 2014, 03:59:21 PM
25K BTC volume on Bitcoinbuilder.

the owner of that website is making MILLIONS just by having a website and "guaranteeing" the trades. He processes them manually. He makes 2% on each trade, on both sides of the trade.

Even for bitcoin standards, this is an astonishing easy way of becoming a fucking millionaire.

I bet he is praying for Gox stalling the situation indefinitely Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

He is doing a pretty good job so far. The payouts are on time, the trades are nearly instant. Can't complain so far.
Guess not everybody is that lucky. Payout not on time, critical bug leaving my balance in minus and no reply to support tickets for close to 48 hours. But he is making good money, no doubt about that.

Kozi, I miss your animated gifs. And I really miss your musical videos. Really.

Heeey i got a fan !

I will use that gif in the Gox's delays thread with your permission Smiley



1473. Post 5340617 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.18h):

Quote from: MatTheCat on February 24, 2014, 04:46:21 PM
Don't know about Mr Allen, but where do you get it from that because we're in a bear market your total worth has to have taken a 50% hair cut?

Perhaps I am taking poetic license in claiming that a Bitcoiner has taken a 50% haircut just because Bitcoin is down 50% in the last two months, but perhaps not. billyjoeallen has stated that he maxed out credit cards to buy into Bitcoin back in the day. That means, he didn't have a bean to rub together, and got into debt to invest in Bitcoin. A absolutely crazy risk that only someone 'in the know' or a complete zealot nutter woud take.

In this case, his death or glory gamble has paid off for him. However, because he is the sort of fanatical nutter that would indebt himself in order to get in on a highly volatile asset, I imagine that most of his wealth is still in Bitcoin. If you have followed the bullshit he has polluted these forums with over the past two months you will know that:

A) He is a holder

B) He completely lacks the ability to read markets

Taking all this into consideration, billyjoeallen is probably worth around half of what he was worth in USD two months ago.

It is a fair comment, I think.

That reminds me - got to get down to my local Tunisian barber. A bargain at 6 Euros a shot!

U in Ireland?

I got the impression that you were a fellow Scot.

Define "back in the day".



1474. Post 5358490 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):




1475. Post 5358643 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on February 25, 2014, 10:25:18 AM
LMFAO

Double bottom? 380, 400.

I know that I'm wiring money like crazy to both Kraken and Bitstamp. There will probably be a shitstorm on the media, noobs will panic sell, I expect blood on the streets and thus for me the time has arrived to go *very* long.



1476. Post 5358809 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on February 25, 2014, 10:37:20 AM
LMFAO

Double bottom? 380, 400.

I know that I'm wiring money like crazy to both Kraken and Bitstamp. There will probably be a shitstorm on the media, noobs will panic sell, I expect blood on the streets and thus for me the time has arrived to go *very* long.
Well, in a way it would certainly make sense. We always thought those 750k BTC fake balances existed. Not so!

I lost you there - which 750k BTC fake balances?



1477. Post 5359233 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: oda.krell on February 25, 2014, 10:59:51 AM
.....

That is fucking brilliant.

You're now officially a worthy successor? sidekick? for TheKoziTwo.

Thank you for the compliment but I could never compare to TheKoziTwo - that guy is genius!

In fact I'd love to watch a musical video made by him about all this shitstorm Smiley



1478. Post 5362567 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: seleme on February 25, 2014, 02:00:06 PM
well, that bitcoinbuilder volume is surely not all the time volume as some suggested yesterday as it was at 40k+ yesterday. So it's 24h volume and they made close to 2k BTC yesterday. Wow, wow, wow

Nice. Making money on pain and despair. Gotta love that Smiley



1479. Post 5364058 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: seleme on February 25, 2014, 02:57:59 PM

Quote
"We should have an official announcement ready soon-ish. We are currently at a turning point for the business. I can't tell much more for now as this also involves other parties."

They are being bought obviously.

If their loss is not too big then it might be good buy. And it might be great dfor Bitcoinland overall if some big and competent name(s) buy them.

No, they want us to believe they are being bought. The HTML comment move is so ridiculous it is painful. They knew that HTML comment was going to "leak". Karpeles is clearly implying they are being bought. I don't believe shit, probably it will just be a make-up action.

Nobody sane would throw money at Gox just now, without a months-long due diligence. No fucking way.



1480. Post 5364479 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

In the meanwhile on Gox:

Quote
Dear MtGox Customers,

In the event of recent news reports and the potential repercussions on MtGox's operations and the market, a decision was taken to close all transactions for the time being in order to protect the site and our users. We will be closely monitoring the situation and will react accordingly.

Best regards,
MtGox Team

"In the event of recent news"Huh So they have shut down all the operations WITHOUT PRIOR ANNOUNCEMENT because of "recent news"? What news?

"We will be closely monitoring the situation"... What situation? What is Karpeles smoking?

Gox is really treating their customers like fools. Angry mobs with pitchforks are completely justified at this point.



1481. Post 5364694 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: niothor on February 25, 2014, 03:37:22 PM
In the meanwhile on Gox:

Quote
Dear MtGox Customers,

In the event of recent news reports and the potential repercussions on MtGox's operations and the market, a decision was taken to close all transactions for the time being in order to protect the site and our users. We will be closely monitoring the situation and will react accordingly.

Best regards,
MtGox Team

"In the event of recent news"Huh So they have shut down all the operations WITHOUT PRIOR ANNOUNCEMENT because of "recent news"? What news?

"We will be closely monitoring the situation"... What situation? What is Karpeles smoking?

Gox is really treating their customers like fools. Angry mobs with pitchforks are completely justified at this point.

You won't see a mob in the bitcoin environment. There was no mob with bfl  , no mob with pirate no nothing.
And the whales that played on mtgox , I have the bad feeling they've already cashed out.

Why the bad feeling? I doubt I qualify as a whale (even if in this thread 500 coins are considered "walls" some times), but I certainly cashed out Gox months ago.



1482. Post 5364733 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: Loaded on February 25, 2014, 03:40:53 PM
Hearing rumors that gox has been bought out, can't confirm.

What is 100% sure is that Gox itself wants us to believe that, they have been spreading many hints, see:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=486925.msg5363981#msg5363981




1483. Post 5364903 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: niothor on February 25, 2014, 03:44:57 PM
In the meanwhile on Gox:

Quote
Dear MtGox Customers,

In the event of recent news reports and the potential repercussions on MtGox's operations and the market, a decision was taken to close all transactions for the time being in order to protect the site and our users. We will be closely monitoring the situation and will react accordingly.

Best regards,
MtGox Team

"In the event of recent news"Huh So they have shut down all the operations WITHOUT PRIOR ANNOUNCEMENT because of "recent news"? What news?

"We will be closely monitoring the situation"... What situation? What is Karpeles smoking?

Gox is really treating their customers like fools. Angry mobs with pitchforks are completely justified at this point.

You won't see a mob in the bitcoin environment. There was no mob with bfl  , no mob with pirate no nothing.
And the whales that played on mtgox , I have the bad feeling they've already cashed out.

Why the bad feeling? I doubt I qualify as a whale (even if in this thread 500 coins are considered "walls" some times), but I certainly cashed out Gox months ago.

I was referring to the whales that had money at the beginning of February in there.
I'm pretty sure they've cashed out  , fiat or coins , leaving nothing but leftovers for the small players.

Btw , you're trading on stamp now , or you adopted the hodl tactic?

I'm on stamp, but not trading much... Just buying ATM. Buying quite a lot in fact. Just wired a very consistent amount today to both Bitstamp and Kraken. I'll place most of my bids on the $400-500 range as I'm hoping for a shitstorm on the media and hopefully also a lot of panic sales from the noobs. Wonderful time to go long. I will also leave a 30% of my fiat on both exchanges with bids below $400 in case the shit really hits the fans.

This is a golden opportunity to increase one's stash IMO.



1484. Post 5365128 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: magicmexican on February 25, 2014, 03:55:46 PM
Going up, up, up where are my cheap coins  Undecided

Even Risto said its time to buy, but bears will be bears

Well, if NOW it is not the time to buy, when it is?

I sure as hell regret not having money on the exchanges right now. I sent two biggish wires today, but when they hit both Stamp and Kraken it might not be the optimal moment. I would have bought a lot of $400 coins earlier today if I had the fiat there.



1485. Post 5365190 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: TERA on February 25, 2014, 10:54:04 AM
The recovery is maxed out for now. It's going to take at least a day to consolidate and break $520 if not longer.

Sure.



1486. Post 5366451 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.19h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 25, 2014, 04:48:55 PM
BitcoinRain was a Brazilian "bitcoin investment fund" that operated from Oct/2011 to Apr/2013.  It took the investor's BTC and promised a minimum 9% monthly return in BTC to them.

Any fund that promises those kinds of returns is going to be a scam. That's a no-brainer. Nobody who makes real returns like that needs new investors.

Obviously so.  But what about an investment that promises a 10,000% return in 3 years?


Excuse me? What investment is promising 10,000% returns in 3 years? Please source.

You are trying very hard to embarass yourself, Mr. Stelfi - again and again and again.

Plus, you have just written that Bitcoin is NOT a good investment right now... Are you shure? Price is almost half of its ATH. Let's speak in one year from now, ok?



1487. Post 5368760 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on February 25, 2014, 05:47:46 PM
Clearly you don't know when your comments look like 100% troll.. and in my opinion they we're and stand by Rampion's comment.
Your starting to look like a jack ass

All I know is that Mr. whatever himself wrote in a previous post that he knew Bitcoinrain's owner personally, and defended him.

What I don understand is why he still calls me "Mr. Stelfi".

I don't know Bitcoinrain's owner personally - I happen to know the current owner of Mercado Bitcoin, and they are two separate persons. The Bitcoinrain owner SOLD Mercado Bitcoin to a third party, who is completely unrelated to the ponzi/fund. And BTW: despite of the questionable business model of the aforementioned fund, AFAIK the theft of aprox. 10k bitcoins owned by Bitcoinrain indeed happened and it was not an "inside job" as you implied.

I explained the above just to point out how you are just mis-reading shit on forums and then making up assumptions to support your old-and-already-debunked arguments regarding how Bitcoin is a zero-sum scam, a ponzi, etc. That's not the kind of behaviour I would expect from an intellectual, that's the kind of behaviour I would expect from a troll.

Do you want to contribute in any meaningful way to this community? Then STFU a little while, read a learn and try to ADD to what has already been said instead of repeating the same old songs mixing them with misconceptions and mistakes originating in the little knowledge you have of both the technology and the ecosystem.

And honestly: for a guy who is supposed to have a background in cryptography you have been pretty out of this world to arrive SO LATE to Bitcoin. Wake up Mr.Stolfi, we are in 2014. The good news is you didn't necessarily miss the train, just wake up, stop trolling and open your eyes.



1488. Post 5369666 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: rudrigorc2 on February 25, 2014, 06:49:20 PM

I don't know Bitcoinrain's owner personally - I happen to know the current owner of Mercado Bitcoin, and they are two separate persons. The Bitcoinrain owner SOLD Mercado Bitcoin to a third party, who is completely unrelated to the ponzi/fund. And BTW: despite of the questionable business model of the aforementioned fund, AFAIK the theft of aprox. 10k bitcoins owned by Bitcoinrain indeed happened and it was not an "inside job" as you implied.

You are misinformed.

Bitcoinrain coins were mixed with mercadobitcoin coins, this is a fact easily verified in the blockchain. The owner of both was the same person and publicly stated  that rain's coins were stolen from INSIDE the exchange mercadobitcoin, he put everything there in ONE account as a safety measure before going on a trip, then never cared to prove it was really hacked. He also lied to the press, more than once.

Here is the clown: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=10275

Tell me how come the new owner does not know this?

Rudrigo, you misunderstood me. I will give you the context. Stolfi made a post saying the following:

a) Bitcoinrain owner is a known thief, who apart from running a ponzi claimed to have 10k btc stolen which he just stole himself
b) Bitcoinrain owner runs Mercado Bitcoin, and people is still using Mercado Bitcoin despite of it being owned by a known thief
c) From a) and b) he implied that people into bitcoin is especially stupid/greedy

What I pointed out is that:

1) Mercado Bitcoin is currently owned by a different person
2) We do not know for sure if the 10k BTC theft was an "inside job" or an "outside job", so making that kind of bold assumptions and presenting them as facts is kinda pointless. I added that AFAIK the 10k theft happened indeed, meaning that it was mostly fueled by incompetence and not by insider collusion. Note that I used "AFAIK" every time i wrote about this matter and I never implied certainty.

Summing up:, I just wanted to highlight how Mr.Stolfi here is making wild assumptions (a), mixing them with a lack of knowledge of the facts (b), and using those to push a trolling/fud-spreading agenda.



1489. Post 5370449 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: KeyserSoze on February 25, 2014, 07:43:32 PM
Andreas Antonopoulos statement:
http://antonopoulos.com/2014/02/25/statement-on-mt-gox/

I'm usually a fan of Andreas, but this rant disappointed me. Half of it is pure marketing of his own product, and it's a lie: despite of the private keys being held client-side, for blockchain.info would be trivial to steal users funds. They just need to inject code to "redirect" funds to a different address on the next transaction, as strongcoin did to return to OzCoin the coins that were stolen to the pool.

Third party wallets are always insecure by definition.



1490. Post 5371716 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

"A cold wallet technique that can't be broken, because of the cryptographic implications"

That's obviously a fake - and one written by someone with very little knowledge of what he is writing about.



1491. Post 5390963 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: rpietila, the Vassal of the Mighty Goat on February 26, 2014, 12:52:46 PM
It is going down - 500 to be tested soon.

Reason: we are not that much below the long-term trend, so given the sentiment, we are "hanging in the air" when the solid ground is in 400-500, below that is a steal and above that is hopes.

Well, I hope you are right, I had a large deposit which hit today Bitstamp and I placed all my bids between $520 and $400.

Doesn't look too good ATM to be honest, but patience is a virtue.

Quote from: Dragonkiller on February 26, 2014, 06:41:58 PM
There's $23m+ on stamp's order book. where did that come from? i find it hard to believe all the people that got goxed that want to buy coins again sent their fiat to stamp so quickly.

Well, a little bit of that is mine. I guess that many bitcoiners followed the same line of thought I did: they got all excited by Gox going down, they smelled blood on the streets and they rushed to send as much fiat as possible to the exchanges to buy as many cheap coins as possible... And they failed. At least for now Smiley



1492. Post 5391235 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.20h):

Quote from: Miz4r on February 26, 2014, 07:28:48 PM
It is going down - 500 to be tested soon.

Reason: we are not that much below the long-term trend, so given the sentiment, we are "hanging in the air" when the solid ground is in 400-500, below that is a steal and above that is hopes.

Well, I hope you are right, I had a large deposit which hit today Bitstamp and I placed all my bids between $520 and $400.

Doesn't look too good ATM to be honest, but patience is a virtue.

Could take more than a week to see a real pullback. After the price bottomed at $65 in June 2013 it shot up to $100 in 6 days, and another 6 days after that there finally was a pullback where it touched $77 again and then stabilized around $85 before going up further.

I remember very well. I loaded the truck between $65 and $100, I bought so much that my average buy in skyrocketed from $10ish to $30ish. Good times.

Anyhow, I have to admit that at that time I expected the price to revisit the $50s, so I missed the opportunity to buy even more... But I remember those days with joy, I cannot help laughing out loud when I remember the hilarious gifs TheKoziTwo posted while we went down...

Do you remember? The '80s... The '70s..... The '60s.....

Lol, what a pity that we missed the '50s. I would have loved a mad-men themed gif Cheesy



1493. Post 5406940 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: thanksmark on February 27, 2014, 02:51:06 PM

That could be a way to move the market.

You want to move the market?  Its not on the site yet..hoax maybe!!

Edit: Hoax surely
Seems that they removed it fast! Maybe it wasn't meant to be published today.

Removed it fast? That's a hoax, you are fooling nobody.



1494. Post 5410665 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.21h):

Quote from: Holliday on February 27, 2014, 06:22:30 PM
Forking Bitcoin to make Gox users whole would destroy trust in Bitcoin itself.

I hope you all realize that a chain fork "to make Gox users whole" will never happen.



1495. Post 5477903 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on March 03, 2014, 07:16:38 AM
Lose >99% BTC
Lose >40% fiat
Lose database along with customer identity data

Well, Emptygox couldn't possibly have done a much worse job than this.

The statement is a joke. How come they did not realize until a few days ago that there was a huge discrepancy between the money they were holding in their bank and the money deposited by their customers?

You all know this is BS and simply cannot happen. They knew very well they had less than they were supposed to, they just decided to run on fractional reserve and spent customers money to cover their own operational expenses. I wouldn't be surprised if Karpeles even cashed out dividends at some point while knowing the company was virtually bankrupt.




1496. Post 5478102 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: jl2012 on March 03, 2014, 08:17:15 AM
Lose >99% BTC
Lose >40% fiat
Lose database along with customer identity data

Well, Emptygox couldn't possibly have done a much worse job than this.

The statement is a joke. How come they did not realize until a few days ago that there was a huge discrepancy between the money they were holding in their bank and the money deposited by their customers?

You all know this is BS and simply cannot happen. They knew very well they had less than they were supposed to, they just decided to run on fractional reserve and spent customers money to cover their own operational expenses. I wouldn't be surprised if Karpeles even cashed out dividends at some point while knowing the company was virtually bankrupt.



He doesn't need dividend. Just by insider trading and arbitraging he would have earned a lot.

According to sturle they "didn't need" to run on fractional reserve as they did "so much money" in fees that they could have covered ANY hole caused by seizures, misappropriations and whatnot.

My reply: never underestimate greed and incompetence. Bad management can destroy the biggest company in the world.



1497. Post 5479320 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on March 03, 2014, 08:40:57 AM
Yes, hopefully authorities will do a good job on investigating that angle. It isn't credible that they didn't notice the fiat hole before.

They knew and its documented. As I wrote in September 2013 during a typical argument with sturle:

Quote
Quote
Defendants are informed and believe that in March and April, 2013 MtGox customers, at the
suggestion of CoinLab, deposited $12,788,701.08 into one or more CoinLab bank accounts;
CoinLab then caused the amount of such funds to be credited to such customers' MtGox
accounts but CoinLab did not transfer the actual funds into the MtGox bank account
. As a
result, such customers' MtGox account reflected a higher amount of currency funds available
to such customers than were actually in the MtGox bank account
. In April, 2013, and upon
the demand of MtGox, CoinLab transferred a portion of those amounts, $ 7,473,490.29, to the
MtGox bank account, leaving a balance of approximately $ 5,315,210.79 to be transferred to
the MtGox account and which is being wrongfully held by CoinLab.

So they they are admitting they have a big hole, and they do not say anywhere that they had to cover the hole with their own money (I would have stated that clearly in the official document, to wipe out doubt about insolvency - wouldn't have you?). The only hard cold fact they are stating is "such customers' MtGox account reflected a higher amount of currency funds available to such customers than were actually in the MtGox bank account".

The most plausible explanation to the ongoing delays, given the above and the other information available to the public, is that Gox is low on cash and running a fractional reserve.

So, IMO the big question is not "if" they knew they were short of customer's money because it is painfully obvious THEY KNEW, the big question is: WHERE DID THAT MONEY GO???

$5.5M are held by Department of Home Security (the "Dwolla situation") and $5.3M by Coinlab, that's clear. But where did the rest of the money go, as they are claming they have a hole of $22M? We need to factor in that they have made +$10M in trading fees during the last year, so in reality the missing money is at least $32M...

Crazy stuff, you really can't make this shit up.



1498. Post 5479497 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: dreamspark on March 03, 2014, 10:14:44 AM


So, IMO the big question is not "if" they knew they were short of customer's money because it is painfully obvious THEY KNEW, the big question is: WHERE DID THAT MONEY GO???

$5.5M are held by Department of Home Security (the "Dwolla situation") and $5.3M by Coinlab, that's clear. But where did the rest of the money go, as they are claming they have a hole of $22M? We need to factor in that they have made +$10M in trading fees during the last year, so in reality the missing money is at least $32M...

Crazy stuff, you really can't make this shit up.

This is one of the things I dont understand. Yeah okay missing bitcoins could be stolen etc, but where did all the cash go. I bet they received at least 2-3 million in fiat after they shut btc withdrawals and the price crashed. One guy on here sent 800k alone then there was the other guy who sent 55k. It beggars belief it really does.

I'd bet that the hole was caused by a a few things compounded together:

1) Bad management, eg. considering customer funds as "assets" and thus using them to cover operational expenses believing they would cover that up with fees later on (something similar to what they did by crediting customers accounts with money they did not held in reality as per the Coinlab situation). Maybe they even tried to do some arbitrage and they fucked up - what I know for sure is that incompetence should NEVER be underestimated.

2) Seizures by LE. We know for sure that DHS is holding $5M of Gox's customers money and that $5.3M are held by Coinlab. It doesn't look like there's more than that because in the leaked docs they clearly listed that money (DHS+Coinlab) as "assets", and there was no other entry for other money that could have potentially been held by other parties.

3) Outright stealing. Right now that seems more plausible to me than a few months ago. I always thought Gox was "basically honest", but after seeing their business plan it seems to me they were just a bunch of amateurs playing with third party money like it was their own - that's criminal negligence at best. They were operating an exchange but their accounting looks like the one of a bank, listing customer deposits as assets of the company, like they could use that money to cover their own expenses. That's crazy (and criminal) in my book. At this point I wouldn't be surprised they even took out dividends from the company at some point, while knowing they were running fractional and virtually bankrupt... And that's stealing.

 





1499. Post 5480811 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: CryptoFuture on March 03, 2014, 11:44:02 AM
We still going up or was that just a tease?

Semi NSFW
http://i.imgur.com/Eb0I1OL.gif

As this is the official off-topic thread I will take the occasion to say something I always wanted to: I'm really amazed by the NSFW thing US folks use when linking to sex related images.... is so ridiculous I cannot even understand it.

How does that work exactly? Naked ladies/porn is specifically considered "not suitable for work" but general news or other non-work related stuff is suitable? What about sports news? Bitcoin stuff? I mean, I'd say that everything non-work related might be considered "not suitable" in many circumstances (you are supposed to be working, not reading about sports or bitcoin, right?), but the fact of specifically labeling "naked ladies/sex" as "not suitable for work" seems to me the reflection of a ridiculously biggot society. Cheesy



1500. Post 5480893 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: mellowyellow on March 03, 2014, 11:51:15 AM
Seriously guys, stop posting these images, I wont be able to open this thread at the office....

Yeah, even people quoting those images get an ignore from me. Some people are not sat in their bedrooms.

WTF? So you can spend your work-time on non-work related forums but looking at a couple of tits is some sort of NO-NO that will get you automatically fired as soon as those tits are displayed on your screen?

You are really saying that the fact that a tits picture is displayed is such a deal?

Really guys, what's wrong with you in the US? In all offices I've been working everybody had a little time to a) read some news, b) watch some tits. It's a stress killer Smiley



1501. Post 5480909 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: mmitech on March 03, 2014, 12:19:36 PM
We still going up or was that just a tease?

Semi NSFW
http://i.imgur.com/Eb0I1OL.gif

As this is the official off-topic thread I will take the occasion to say something I always wanted to: I'm really amazed by the NSFW thing US folks use when linking to sex related images.... is so ridiculous I cannot even understand it.

How does that work exactly? Naked ladies/porn is specifically considered "not suitable for work" but general news or other non-work related stuff is suitable? What about sports news? Bitcoin stuff? I mean, I'd say that everything non-work related might be considered "not suitable" in many circumstances (you are supposed to be working, not reading about sports or bitcoin, right?), but the fact of specifically labeling "naked ladies/sex" as "not suitable for work" seems to me the reflection of a ridiculously biggot society. Cheesy

I will ignore the porn/and naked ladies part... but no it depends about the nature of your job, if you are a reporter or a journalist you can watch news and anything, if you are and IT guy you can watch support forums and or technology news threads because this is the only way you stay updated, if you are a teacher than yea you should be doing your job teaching instead of hanging around the internet..... I think you get my point here.

it depends on how your productivity is effected, in my case I am more productive and can deliver better results if before resolving an issue I look online or alternative and better ideas to do so... or simply by taking the chance to learn new stuff on the time when I have nothing to do...

I specifically said non-work related stuff. It's obvious that if you are a sports journalist then sports news are work-related - just as obvious as if you are working on a production company that makes porn then looking at "naked ladies/porn" is part of your job.



1502. Post 5481139 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on March 03, 2014, 12:29:55 PM
We still going up or was that just a tease?

Semi NSFW
http://i.imgur.com/Eb0I1OL.gif

As this is the official off-topic thread I will take the occasion to say something I always wanted to: I'm really amazed by the NSFW thing US folks use when linking to sex related images.... is so ridiculous I cannot even understand it.

How does that work exactly? Naked ladies/porn is specifically considered "not suitable for work" but general news or other non-work related stuff is suitable? What about sports news? Bitcoin stuff? I mean, I'd say that everything non-work related might be considered "not suitable" in many circumstances (you are supposed to be working, not reading about sports or bitcoin, right?), but the fact of specifically labeling "naked ladies/sex" as "not suitable for work" seems to me the reflection of a ridiculously biggot society. Cheesy

We have to work with fat ugly women who threaten workplace harassment lawsuits because they feel inferior. They are backed up by the white knight beta boyz trying to get into their hideously overstretched pant suits. Puritans I can deal with. It's the feminutiness imported from Europe that metastasized here and morphed into this PC Orwellian crimethink nightmare that's so much fun to subvert ;-)

Well, those feminist might be imported for Europe, but I *do* work with women and I always did, and no european woman would even think about suing a co-worker because he is watching naked ladies/porn at the office. Really, what the fuck? Suing somebody because he is watching something?

Honestly, it is a mentality thing: you will see that the NSFW acronym is exclusively an US/anglosaxon thing. That shit (the acronym) doesn't even exists in most of Europe. Probably you shouldn't be watching porn while in the office, but just as you shouldn't be doing anything non work related. In most of Europe a boss would fire you if you didn't perform because of spending too much time on stuff non related to work, but the fact that stuff is "naked ladies" or "sports news" wouldn't really matter. Only the fact that a specific acronym ("NSFW") exists and is specifically related to "sexy images" is totally crazy and the reflection of a fucked up, puritan and biggot mentality.



1503. Post 5481284 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: dreamspark on March 03, 2014, 12:31:04 PM
Rampion, I would be interested to know what jobs you have worked in where it's acceptable to look at shit like that. Im in the Uk as well so not the US. I think its obvious, non-work related stuff is not allowed, looking at a wall of text on a forum is not obviously non-work related whereas someone in their underwear is obviously non-work related. Lunch times and breaks are a different matter.

Before I started my own business I've been working in at least 7 companies, ranging from the multi-national type in which you are just a number to the small one where you just have a boss a 3 to 5 coworkers. In all of them I could watch a pair of tits at some point if needed. In most of them I could even tell to my boss: wow, this chick is fucking hot, look at her! For sure in some places I had to be a little more careful to who could see my screen than in others... But the fact is that if you are performing well and doing the job you are supposed to do, who the fuck cares? Now that I am boss myself, the thing is clear: I evaluate performance and I don't care about ANYTHING else.



1504. Post 5485421 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: seleme on March 03, 2014, 04:42:01 PM
Where is the guy that was happy to send 50k$ via OKPay to MtGOX? How are you feeling now and what are you doing to recover your money?

Ouch, totally forgot about that. Has he posted since?

Yes, he lost 1120 BTC on Gox. But to be fair if I couldl move fiat from btc-e and stamp, I'd sent 10k there at least too.
Who was it again?

Can't recall his username. He posted it on the "How much you lost on Gox" thread somewhere on services forum.

Man, he is TheKoziTwo. A true classic of these forums, he posted the most opportune and hilarious animated gifs during the 2013 bear market and he is also the creator of two of the best Bitcoin songs:

Blame it on MtGox: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2ku1A5Ox8UY
The Proudhon Song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7TuFy0fcuw

Every Bitcoiner should know that shit.



1505. Post 5486334 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: mmitech on March 03, 2014, 05:38:18 PM
holy.... what is happening ? who didnt buy back yet ?


Not a single bid I've placed was filled, I failed hard by sending the fiat to the exchanges one day too late Sad



1506. Post 5486705 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Bunch of amateur exchanges. Bitstamp running slow like shit, unable to trade properly.



1507. Post 5486778 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

Quote from: seleme on March 03, 2014, 06:13:06 PM
I lost at least 50 BTC today by not buying at 570  Cry

Fuck, I had bids from $540 to $420 - I didn't hit a single one. Sent the money to exchanges a day too late.

Anyhow, $650 is pretty cheap too. Cheesy



1508. Post 5488371 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.23h):

I'm betting Mr. Stolfi will buy bitcoins at some point. Too much involvement in here, he will buy for sure.

Just be vigilant, as soon as he buys, sell: it will be the very top.

Cheesy Wink



1509. Post 5556716 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.24h):

I'm entertaining the idea Dorian S. Nakamoto and his family pulled a prank on newsweek.

Just compare: http://i.imgur.com/DB4oq5s.png

And enjoy the smile on his face when he looks for a reporter to be taken for lunch: http://instagram.com/p/lNv9-_QaNF/



1510. Post 5570114 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: Loozik on March 07, 2014, 02:30:40 PM
By the way, if you find it hard to believe that a man in the situation of Dorian Nakamoto could invent bitcoin and not cash out a single coin: check Grigori Perelman, who settled the Poincaré Conjecture and then turned down the Fields Medal and a 1,000,000 US$ prize:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigori_Perelman
http://brettforrest.com/articles/shattered-genius/

I too think it is him.

I do not think it is him at all. The journalist "work" is extremely bad and based on pure speculation, it really looks like this is a prank pulled on her by Dorian's brother.

The internet is full of posts by Dorian (Amazon; guns forums; train models forums; Toyota forum; etc.) and his writing style is EXTREMELY different (and bad) compared to SN's. The journalist was SO BAD and so eager to publish this story that she didn't even take the time to make a real comparison between the writing of both characters - she just wrote on his piece that Dorian's wife said that her husband mixes both American and UK english, which is beyond ridiculous as a "proof", especially if there is SO much material on the internet to make a REAL comparison. It's obvious that Dorian writes a very bad english, and this is very easily verifiable: his posts all over the internet.

All in all there's some circumstancial evidence, but not a single hint of firm evidence. In fact, the strongest evidence is that the guy's birth name is Satoshi Nakamoto -  but Dorian is a physicist and an engineer, not a cryptographer; add to that his bad english (which, again, is easily proved by using a little google-skills) and the unbelievable characteristics of this story (a guy who never spoke to his family about his project and went to greath lengths to be anonymous "tacitly admits" his involvment to a journalist and uses his real name to publish the foundational paper).

I bet Dorian is not SN. It just doesn't add up. If his birth name was not "Satoshi Nakamoto", everybody would have been laughing at this whole story. It's much more likely SN is Nick Szabo - the evidence is still circumstancial but orders of magnitude stronger in his case. For Christ sake, Nick Szabo was the "inventor" of the "smart contract" concept, his work revolves around the concept of eliminating trust on third parties using decentralized ledgers and he created "bit gold" (which is pure and simply the precursor of Bitcoin), working on it for decades until he stopped publishing papers on electronic cash around 2005 (his last post on bit gold was written on his blog on 2008, just little before the Bitcoin paper was published - what a coincidence). Plus, Szabo's and Satoshi's writing styles are very similar, they use the very same terms and concepts and their work revolves around the very same point. It really looks like Szabo found the "solution to the problem" and created bitcoin, and that's why he never published again about electronic cash/trustless sytems - which were the center of his work for more than a decade. He never wrote about bitcoin and ignores all the comments about bitcoin on his blog, which seems incredibly shady given the fact that he is clearly the inspirator of such a system…  All that might be circumstancial, but the links (in form of PAPERS and WORKS, not speculation by family members and retarded journalists) are SO strong they cannot be ignored.

IMO all this Dorian story is a ludicrous joke that leverages on just three things: A) Dorian's name; B) the fact Dorian worked on classified projects; C) the fact Dorian is a libertarian and quite "paranoid" when it comes to Government - which is simply what you would expect from anyone who has worked for the Government - he just knows first hand that Govs spy and apply violence on people.

The Newsweek journalists should be ashamed.




1511. Post 5571091 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on March 07, 2014, 04:01:55 PM
Excellent summary of what is wrong with the article. I guess the fact that Newsweek went "all in" and made it a cover story had everybody lose their head for a moment, and ignore the obvious objections.

There's only circumstantial evidence that Dorian is "Satoshi", and in fact, there are other candidates for which there exists much more such circumstantial evidence.

Actually I don't believe the article myself, it reads as if the reporter twisted the words and facts to fit her theory.

Someone posted earlier a paragraph that Newsweek deleted from that article, which explained how the reporter had found Dorian by combing through all the "Satoshi Nakamoto"s living in the US. Now, if you collect a hundred random people from some database, there is a good chance that you will find one who has a computer or electronics background (even if it is not cryptography).  That person quite likely will have worked for some technology company (where else?) that did classified wor for the government (is there any company in the US that didn't?)  Heck, even *I* worked for two such companies (Xerox and Digital Equipment).

Then you only have to pick a phrase or two from relatives and acquaintances that suggests he is the guy, and omit the cartloads of evidence that suggest that he isn't...


Well, I guess that a shitstorm is going on at Newsweek right now. Goodman just disappeared from tweeter when evidence in form of Dorian's posts written in incredibly bad english started to pile up. She did a VERY bad job and had this coming, as she has been exchanging emails with Dorian before speaking to him briefly - but obviously she couldn't use that emails as "evidence" in her piece because probably were written in that kind of english that SN would have NEVER used. Instead, she used ambiguos quotes from his family members to justify a similarity in writing styles that simply does not exist.

What an epic way to fuck up the relaunch of the printed edition of a magazine that once upon a time was believed to be an example of quality journalism. Really epic fuck up - and I'm enjoying it in a sort of twisted way.

And all in all this has been a tremedous publicity for Bitcoin. The SN myth is growing Smiley



1512. Post 5573816 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: elasticband on March 07, 2014, 04:57:47 PM
Satoshi was hal finney.

Very unlikely IMO.

1) He would have break a basic OPSEC principle: compartimentalization. Never mix your true identity with your anonymous identity. And Satoshi followed OPSEC very strictly.

2) It seems very unplausible that a focused person like Satoshi (the same argument is valid for Hal) would have spent so much time debating with himself, that would be borderline schizofrenic behaviour, and that doesn't fit neither Satoshi nor Hal.

In any case the crucial point is 1). Imagine you want to be anonymous to avoid the heat - being the recipient of the very first bitcoin transaction and one of the very first developers defeats that purpose. Imagine that shit hits the fan and the Gov goes hard against Bitcoin: Hal would be one of the first (if not the first) to receive a very uncomfortable visit, in a "let's eliminate/interrogate all the possible targets" scenario he would be on the top of the list - and that's an epic OPSEC failure that would lead to almost assured failure.

On the contrary, Nick Szabo (Nakamoto Satoshi) fits incredibly well. It is painfully obvious that Nick is one of the main (if not THE main) inspirators of Satoshi's work. Again: Nick was the inventor of the "smart contracts" concept and he developed extensive work on blockchain-like decentralized ledgers; his bit-gold is simply "bitcoin beta", but he is not even cited as a reference on the Bitcoin whitepaper - the only plausible reason for such ommission is again, OPSEC/compartimentalization. Similarly, Szabo almost never wrote about Bitcoin, despite it is clearly the system he has been writing about from 1996 to 2005. Every question to Szabo about BTC is duly ignored, he just wrote/commented about Bitcoin once after many questions, even if it clearly is the realization of years of his work. Additionally, the last paper on e-currency he wrote was published in 2005, and his very last comment on that matter (which was a central part of his work for at least 9 years) was published on his blog in 2008, shortly before the bitcoin paper was published.

Given the above and other many factors (similarity in writing style and political views, etc.) I give 75% chance that NS is SN. This obviously doesn't mean I want Nick to be "outed": privacy is a fundamental right that should never be taken away for anybody.



1513. Post 5585201 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Let me tell you respectfully that your detective skills suck.

1) TheKoziTwo is from Europe (Scandinavia)
2) TheKoziTwo declared he is a male
3) The singer in his videos is Angel Lee (https://www.youtube.com/user/scmilitarywife)

The above information is easily found by a) looking at his post history and b) reading the comments on his youtube videos.

Quote from: ikiki on March 08, 2014, 04:49:03 AM
Time to the most popular game of the day..Internet detective or chief fud engineer . I really hope i'm wrong
evidence #1
1191 BTC
evidence #2


evidence #3
Last Active:    February 25, 2014, 02:34:46 PM

evidence #4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2ku1A5Ox8U
i know he said he hired someone on fiverr but that could be to hide he's really a she?

evidence #5
Autumn Radtke, chief executive of First Meta Pte Ltd, was found dead at her Singapore home on Feb 26.



1514. Post 5619002 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.25h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on March 10, 2014, 08:15:24 AM
Why did the "MTGOX HACKED!!!" thread dissapear? Did Blitz erase it?  Huh
Yes, it contains wallet stealers (the exe, and possibly the pdf) in addition to sensitive data on everyone who ever used MtGox, and even everyone who ever transacted with MtGox addresses indirectly. Report it where you see it.

The hacker was very clever.

Well, including executable files in what should be a database dump is very fishy indeed. I didn't click on those, that's for sure.

I'm much more worried about the huge privacy leak. The vast majority of people involved in BTC just got doxxed, and their aprox. balances/holdings are now public (at least among the criminal community). 

I guess we will see a spike in the guns for BTC trades. And I hope this reminds everybody how important is to mix our coins, ALWAYS. No excuses. If you ever used Gox and used your real name, now your addresses are linked to your identity and criminals are analyzing that shit. The final goxxing.



1515. Post 6102311 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.33h):

Its been feeling kinda bottomish to me for the last days... I confess I bought more. We might go lower, but I cannot see bitcoin retesting $266 or lower at this stage.

It surely looks like the next couple of bubbles will be massive. Till now only a little minority of early adopters wrapped their heads around bitcoin and managed to buy some coins, but if it becomes easier for the masses to buy in the following mania phase will take the price to the stars and beyond.



1516. Post 6109771 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 07, 2014, 01:17:13 PM
While the "China bank account closure" drama was unfolding, it seems that Neo & Bee collapsed in Cyprus, in a rather ugly way. The CEO left the country without telling staff, and is not answering questions from anyone.  The staff did not receive their March salaries and therefore quit en masse.  There are unpaid debts, and two customers complained to the police that they gave money to N&B to buy bitcoins but did not receive them.  A financial report that was promised at the IPO is overdue, and investors who chipped in 12,000 BTC want to know where the money went.  Its shares (that were not equity but only "profit shares") crashed to 1/10 of their IPO price.

The collapse is being reported by the local press. Presumably bitcoin is dead in Cyprus now...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=529946.msg5891432#msg5891432

No, it is not dead. Or is the dollar dead because of the HSBC mouney laundering fiasco, etc?




1517. Post 6113510 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit on April 07, 2014, 03:23:10 PM
Oh what now? China banned Bitcoin again? Or is it another random rumour?

Ignore everyone here who aren't yelling "trend reversal to the moon!" and guarantee that you will always be surprised when there are new drops Smiley
Some people here are good reminders of the fact, that handling wealth is not for everyone.

Are you talking to me? Why would i do that?
Of course i realize we can go down any minute. I'm just wondering why people have to keep on dumping. When is it enough.


I thought that after so many months into bitcoin you would have learnt something about the markets: price is driven by price action. That's why when BTC goes up for a while the growth becomes exponential (and more so when ATH is broken), and also why the lower it goes the bigger are the dumps.

People is emotional, and the amount of euphoria during a mania phase is directly proportional to the level of fear just before the capitulation.



1518. Post 6113740 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 07, 2014, 05:40:09 PM
The first person to panic wins if you get to buy back in lower.

This is true, first person to panic buy wins as well cause you get more coins for your mullah!

Do you honestly think there is more greed than fear in this market right now?

You only have fear when you are close to the very bottom. Those who feel euphoria or fear always lose, because they buy near the top and sell near the bottom.

Just buy when this forum is bloated by FUD-spreader trolls, and sell when the thread is completely bloated by train pictures.

For the record: I'm buying myself, going in the $300 range is possible in my book, but no way we are going below $266. Given the fact that I bought most of my bitcoins in the $10 to $20 range, buying a little more at $450 or $370 is not really affecting much my average buy-in price. In fact I'm just buying back aprox. the same amount of bitcoins I sold in the $700 to $900 range, which is just the course of action I had in mi mind when I sold.

If we go below $266 (VERY unlikely) I'd expect a long, multi-month bear market, but I'm betting on it NOT happening.

EDITED (some grammar + additions)



1519. Post 6113950 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 07, 2014, 05:46:41 PM
I know this is the wrongest place ever to mention this, but I wish the price would just plummet to the point where all the people who are in this for the money would disappear. Bitcoin is about so much more than it's dollar value. We are building something more important than the internet, and it's like people are obsessing over the price of domain names.

You are being very unrealistic if you are of the belief that getting rid of speculators is helpful to BTC... In the end, the speculators are likely to make or break BTC... Speculators are likely needed in order to drive incentives to build infrastructure and to get other people interested - expanding the user base.

Because of its design Bitcoin won't be able to support real-world payment volume if the price per coin is not high, thus pure speculation (which currently amounts to 99% of the BTC transactions) is just making it easier for companies like Square to adopt it. In fact, the wild speculation on Bitcoin's future price is precisely what is making the price to reach quickly a level that makes it possible for bitcoin to support a real economy transaction volume.

Bitcoin has everything to change the world, quickly: it is a huge innovation that solves real life problems and has numerous applications apart from being "digital cash", and it has also built-in a huge financial incentive that makes its adoption to go viral - nothing speeds adoption faster than the promise of future wealth.



1520. Post 6114050 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.34h):

Quote from: billyjoeallen on April 07, 2014, 05:48:08 PM
The first person to panic wins if you get to buy back in lower.

This is true, first person to panic buy wins as well cause you get more coins for your mullah!

Do you honestly think there is more greed than fear in this market right now?

You only have fear when you are close to the very bottom. Those who feel euphoria or fear always lose, because they buy near the top and sell near the bottom.

Just buy when this forum is bloated by FUD-spreader trolls, and sell when the thread is completely bloated by train pictures.

For the record: I'm buying myself, going in the $300 range is possible in my book, but no way we are going below $266. If we really go below $266 (VERY unlikely) I'd expect a long, multi-month bear market, but I'm betting on it NOT happening.

I'm more of an "It's always darkest before it goes pitch black" kind of guy. I have many times more coins in cold storage so I'm using my trading account as a hedge right now. Worse thing that can happen to me is that I'm stuck with tens of thousands in fiat while my main stash rockets up in value. I think I can live with that. Locking in profit on coins I bought in two digits may be a fear move, but it's the smart play. How many people with much much more BTC than me have to do the same thing for price to crater? Not Many.

I would advise you to take the profits during uptrends and following a rational plan (when we will hit this price I will sell x% of my stash, etc.) - I hate stating the obvious, but I'd avoid selling during dowtrends and buying during uptrends.



1521. Post 6196483 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.36h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on April 11, 2014, 01:08:50 PM
Bitstamp stuff are behaving a little bit strange :

https://twitter.com/Bitstamp/status/454601576007864320




mmmm so Why ? they never did that before !!!
It's highly concerning that apparently Bitstamp is showing willingness to manipulate the market given the role they play., because we don't know if there is any real foul play behind the scenes. MtGox once did the same with a similar statement in a press release. I deemed them somewhat more professional than MtGox, but perhaps I was wrong.

At least MtGox have stated that they would disallow their employees from insider trading, but I have not heard anything like that from Bitstamp.

You can bet your hat there was a huge amount of "insider trading" on Gox, and that currently that's happening on Bitstamp too.

Do not forget people running those service are a bunch of amateurs (at best), which are not compliant with current financial regulations - to operate as an exchange in the EU you need to have a banking license, in most of the US states you need to be registered as a MSB, etc. - Bitstamp is operating with a SINGLE corporate account where they mix all customers funds, and probably their own too. Taking deposits without a banking license is illegal in the EU, and it is also very dangerous for the customers: if ONE Bitstamp customer is investigated the relevant authority will have no other option that to freeze the ONLY bank account Bitstamp has, de facto screwing up all their customers. That wouldn't happen if they were compliant and thus acting as a bank, setting up a separate fiat account for each one of their customers.

From a legal point of view, currently Bitstamp is the sole owner of the corporate account in which customers are depositing their trading funds, which is very bad for their customers and totally non-compliant, as customers are not exchanging their money for a service but DEPOSITING it in order to trade with each other.

You can bet Bitstamp knows this very well, and yet they continue to operate because the risk is worth it - you can bet they are ready to take other kinds of risks too as per "insider trading".

That said, while operating an exchange without a banking license (or a banking partner providing that license as Fidor Bank does for bitcoin.de, which from a legal POV is just a tied agent of Fidor) is illegal/non-compliant in the EU, Bitstamp is not giving a shit about that fact risking all their customer funds to LE or regulators, I bet the apply the same standard for other dangerous practices.

We are still in the wild west, folks... But probably not for too long.



1522. Post 6215492 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: oda.krell on April 14, 2014, 03:15:20 PM

How can you say there is 0% chance of below 200? That is ridiculous. There is no such thing as 0% chance. What if tomorrow,
1. U.S. bans bitcoin
2. A flaw is found in the code
3. EC or SHA256  is broken
4. The existing exchanges shut down due to fraud or seizure.
5. Someone randomly decides to dump 30KBTC at market on bitstamp.
6. The economy melts down

sub 1% total.  6 is not a case.  in a meltdown btc will only correlate weakly.


"sub 1%" chance for Bitstamp going belly up because Unicredit suddenly pulls the plug, and prices plunging as a result (even if just for a flash crash from which we immediately recover)?

That's an awfully optimistic stance (and I say that as an active trader on stamp).

EDIT: in case this isn't clear from the above, and lest I be accused of "bear FUD"... there's nothing wrong with Unicredit and Bitstamp right now, to my knowledge. Don't panic. I just consider the entire banking/exchange situation to be somewhat fragile, so in my mind, there's a > 1% chance that things can go sour without much warning.

There's definitely a good chance of that happening, as Bitstamp is operating with a corporate account - exactly the same type of account that you would have to receive payments for selling goods or services, the type of account in which you can commingle funds because they are legally yours as soon as you get them - but as Bitstamp is not selling goods or services but acting as a financial intermediary you can see clearly how they are non-compliant with EU regulation regarding PSP (payment services providers) and other financial intermediaries. They either need to have a banking license (lengthy and extremely expensive process) or to operate under the banking license of a banking partner (not easy because the bank would have full responsibility on customer funds - Fidor is doing that for Bitcoin.de as you can see on Bitcoin.de's disclaimer, while Unicredit is definitely NOT doing that for Bitstamp).

All in all, what davout (founder of Bitcoin Central) is saying HERE is definitely right, I can guarantee you that as I've made my own thorough due diligence with regulators in more than one EU country. Truth is Bitcoin Central is *mostly* compliant, as they are using a banking partner that opens one separate bank account for each one of their customers - that's the way to go, otherways as soon as regulators needs to fine you, or to freeze a certain amount of money because of suspicious activity, they will have to freeze all customers funds as they sit on a single bank account that is legally property of the exchange and not of the customers themselves.

Bitstamp either becomes compliant or it gets sold to a big fish that will make it compliant or it will be shut down eventually. Probably they have made enough millions to become a bank, but saying that there is less than 1% chance for them to be shut down is simply delusional.




1523. Post 6215623 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: mmitech on April 14, 2014, 04:04:02 PM

How can you say there is 0% chance of below 200? That is ridiculous. There is no such thing as 0% chance. What if tomorrow,
1. U.S. bans bitcoin
2. A flaw is found in the code
3. EC or SHA256  is broken
4. The existing exchanges shut down due to fraud or seizure.
5. Someone randomly decides to dump 30KBTC at market on bitstamp.
6. The economy melts down

sub 1% total.  6 is not a case.  in a meltdown btc will only correlate weakly.


"sub 1%" chance for Bitstamp going belly up because Unicredit suddenly pulls the plug, and prices plunging as a result (even if just for a flash crash from which we immediately recover)?

That's an awfully optimistic stance (and I say that as an active trader on stamp).

EDIT: in case this isn't clear from the above, and lest I be accused of "bear FUD"... there's nothing wrong with Unicredit and Bitstamp right now, to my knowledge. Don't panic. I just consider the entire banking/exchange situation to be somewhat fragile, so in my mind, there's a > 1% chance that things can go sour without much warning.

The local unicredit Branch employees are Bitcoin bulls, I know few of them personally, but this doesn't represent the big picture of what Unicredit Bank as a corporate thinks about Bitcoin which is unknown for me...

I'm sure they are, I suspect the Bitstamp account brings in quite a nice bit of revenue and fees.

But that's not the point, right? We were assigning probabilities to events, pulled out of our asses, but motivated by our experience and expectations. And my experience and expectation is that the banking interface is a fragile one, that could break. Not likely, so I personally don't see more than a, say, 5% chance that it happens, but "sub 1%" is another way of saying it's nigh impossible, and that I disagree with.

I agree, I was just pointing out that Banks are aware of Bitcoin, and when we say Banks we are not talking about computers and buildings but about people and employees running/working in these banks.


yet, I share the fear with many of you, if something somehow happen to an exchange's Banking account, basically only people who have funds there are fucked, but if anything happens to the bank (just look to the new EU Bank bailing road-map) than not only Exchanges are fucked but pretty much everyone living in EU and the ones who didn't even hear about Bitcoin will be the most effected.

if I summarize the situation, what is happening in the world right now doesn't look so promising, and having fiat sitting in your bank account is not safer than having Bitcoin sitting in your wallet, even when considering a scenario when an exchange like Bitstamp gets fucked up by its bank, the consequences will be temporary comparing with what could go wrong if something similar happens with the EU banking system.



The fact is that an exchange commingling all their customers funds in one single bank account is simply non-compliant, and even illegal in most of the EU.

Just check how brokers work: you need to open a bank account UNDER YOUR NAME on a certain bank, and give the broker an authorization to operate with your account for this or that purpose - but customers funds are never commingled, each customer has his own separate bank account.

Bitcoin exchanges (apart from B-C afaik) do not operate that way (not even Kraken), exposing customers to a huge risk. It just takes one rotten seed (eg, a drug dealer) operating in exchange X and the only option LE has is to freeze the full account - that's why you cannot take customers deposits* in the EU if you are not a bank.

*deposit = holding funds on behalf of a third party - those funds are NOT legally yours, you are just holding them on behalf of your customer - that's what banks and only banks do.



1524. Post 6216206 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: mmitech on April 14, 2014, 04:26:25 PM

I get the Idea of how brokers work, but an Exchange dealing with Bitcoin is simply acting an Escrow while brokers have a different business model than a Bitcoin exchange.

Stock exchanges are not designed for everyone, but Bitcoin is designed to be widely used for normal users who wont go through the hassle of opening an account and linking it to an exchange just to buy a bitcoin.

coinbase operates the same way as you described above, but coinbase without an exchanges like Bitstamp wont be possible, unless the adoption of Bitcoin by merchants and their daily transaction volume becomes equal to the need of users to buy/sell.

Believe me if I tell you that I did a thorough due diligence on the matter and I've received formal replies from financial regulators on more than one EU country: Bitstamp is absolutely non compliant under EU regulations, I can guarantee you that.

Coinbase is a completely different business: they are not an "exchange", they are a "bureau de change" (like the one in which you exchange currency at the airport): the main difference is that when you are buying or selling on Coinbase your legal counterpart is Coinbase itself, and NOT another customer like it happens on Bitstamp, Kraken, etc.. When you are sending money to Coinbase from a legal POV you are transacting with Coinbase itself, they are not holding the money on your behalf while you transact with another customer - the reason they are operating that way and NOT as an exchange of the kind of Bitstamp (which is much more profitable revenue wise) is PRECISELY because they are a serious company and they know they cannot do that - at least currently, as having a banking license (as it IS required for a trading exchangr as per Bitstamp) is not only expensive but very lengthy as the barriers for newcomers are high.

If you read carefully the ToS of the emerging exchanges you will see hints of what I'm saying: the new one based on the UK is registered as a "bureau de change" in a Coinbase fashion precisely to avoid to adquire a banking license; the one just launched in Mexico says clearly that by sending them money you are adquiring their own virtual currency, which only purpose is to buy and sell cryptos, and that they DO NOT HOLD customer deposits (because from a legal POV you are buying their own "virtual currency" by wiring them money) - those are just tricks to try to avoid the hard cold truth, which is that you need to be a bank to hold deposits on behalf of third parties.

About the escrow: I've never looked into that business model, but I approached regulators explaining them EXACTLY how a Bitcoin exchange work and they have told me that under the PSP (payment service provider) / financial intermediaries EU regulation I needed to either have a banking license or to have a banking partner holding, controlling and supervising all customer deposits (because that money is not YOURS, it belongs to your customer). While I'm ignorant on that aspect, at this stage I'd bet that an escrow would need to comply with the same regulation, as they are acting as financial intermediaries by holding funds that do not belong to them.






1525. Post 6216499 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: mah87 on April 14, 2014, 04:46:45 PM
Kraken is also well known to be fully compliant and extremely careful about that (and about security) so I guess this model is possible too right ?

Kraken is well known to have made a huge marketing effort to make people believe they are compliant. The reality is that they just have two banks accounts:

1) OPERATIONAL EXPENSES ACCOUNT (this is where the money to pay for company's expenses sit)
2) DEPOSITS ACCOUNT (this is where customer's money sit)

They say the never mix the funds, which is better from a practical POV (Bitstamp mixes everything on a single account, which is simply suicidal), but legally it is exactly the same as having a single bank account: both accounts are ON KRAKEN'S NAME, which means that if regulators need to go after a Kraken customer, they will just freeze the whole account because legally it is a property of Kraken. They do not have a banking license and when they are questioned about HOW can they say they are compliant if they are not compliant with the european Directive for Payment Services, they respond with a vague "we are operating under Fidor's banking license" which is NOT true - Fidor has no responsibility on none of their accounts, in fact they are "lending" their banking license to Bitcoin.de but NOT to Kraken.

As per Bitcoin.de legal disclaimer:

Quote
Notice pursuant to § 2 Section 10 of the Banking Act:

The Bitcoin Deutschland AG is acting as tied agent of the FIDOR Bank AG within the meaning of § 2 Section 10 of the Banking Act and provides the system or the completion of financial instruments in accordance with §1 Section 1a Sentence 2 No. 1 und No. 2 of the Banking Act exclusively in the name and for the account of the FIDOR Bank AG.

Now read the aforementioned sections of the Banking Act and you will see that it is very clear: if you are a financial intermediary/investment broker, etc. (which means holding/managing funds on behalf of third parties) you need to be either a bank, or a tied agent of a bank, which means that the bank is supervising and controlling the customers funds, which are NOT sitting on an account on your name. This is true for Bitcoin.de, NOT true for Kraken. Kraken is NOT a tied agent of Fidor, if they were they would NEED to state that clearly on their ToS. Fidor has no control nor supervision on neither of Kraken's accounts, you can call them and ask yourself (and then ask the same question on Bitcoin.de to see the difference).




1526. Post 6216818 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Adrian-x on April 14, 2014, 04:53:23 PM
So through in a gag order and this could have happened to Gox, I'm sure lots of silk road money was in Gox's bank.

Of course this has happened to Gox, it is all public information - Department of Home Security seized a Gox account holding $5M in customers funds, Gox lists those $5M in the "assets" part in their bankrupcy protection filing.

If they were compliant, meaning that every customer had a single and separate bank account, that wouldn't have happened - because LEGALLY it would have been customers money, each customers would have held its OWN money in a separate bank account, and it wouldn't have been "Gox money", arbitrarily seizable by LE at the first sign of suspicious activity. The problem here is that getting a banking license costs DOZENS of millions + years of burocracy, and getting an established bank to become your partner by taking full responsibility as Fidor does with Bitcoin.de is no easy job at this stage - hopefully it will become easier in the near future.



1527. Post 6227486 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Mythul on April 15, 2014, 09:24:30 AM
OMG. Ive never seen such a one day rally !

Well, I guess you are quite new then. You will see bigger rallies in the future, you can be sure about that Smiley



1528. Post 6227757 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Dr. LY on April 15, 2014, 08:33:08 AM
I don't have any clue wtf to do now.

I bought my first btc at around 680 because there were "cheap coins."

I bought more on the way down to 500 to "cost average"

I put almost my entire savings at 480

Then everyone said if it broke 400 we were screwed and there was NO good news from China at all so I sold at 399.

So wtf do I do now? I've lost thousands and the money hasn't hit my bank account so I can't even buy back in. Wtf do i do?

Next time just be rational.


Everybody who has followed such a rational approach has profited A LOT from Bitcoin, while still retaining a huge amount of coins. We could exclude the people that bought at the top of the last bull run, but if they did not realize their losses by selling they will be just fine.



1529. Post 6227863 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on April 15, 2014, 09:49:40 AM
... it is kind of ironic that all the assholes are the ones who end up shorting bitcoin ... the fastest rising monetary asset EVER ... they deserve it, they are welcome to it, meet your fate.

This +10000

Anyhow, we had retards coming in here screaming they were shorting during all major downtrends since 2011. I remember the guy who was shorting with 5x leverage on plus500.... As soon as the price rallied up the guy just disappeared, probably lost everything.

You just DO NOT SHORT the fastest appreciating asset ever. Sure, volatility is high and thus downtrends go pretty deep, but compared to rallies downtrends are ridiculously tiny. I think the "shorters" are noobs moved by greed, they enter the market during a downtrend and they want to profit hard ASAP. They are just dumb, they do not understand that the potential profit of shorting is very small compared to the amount of risk given the historic exponential appreciation of Bitcoin.




1530. Post 6227890 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: Dr. LY on April 15, 2014, 09:52:17 AM
Either way, the money just became available in my account. So I'm going to take Rpietila's advice, because he knows better than I do through experience.

I will state the obvious again: do not take anybody's advice on when to sell or when to buy. Just invest what you can afford to lose, make a rational plan regarding profit taking at certain points, and stop looking at the charts.



1531. Post 6227938 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Now, show me a post by a hero member saying he is shorting. Find someone? No one. The ones who did in the past (Moonshadow and his shorting during 2011 comes to mind) admitted they faced such losses they will never short BTC again.



1532. Post 6228229 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.37h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 14, 2014, 07:21:33 PM
(...)
LET'S GIVE PROBABILITIES TO THE FOLLOWING EVENTS
(...)
d) In 2014, price will visit below 400 = 80%
e) In 2014, price will visit above 500 = 30%
f) In 2014, price will visit above 750 = 5%
(...)

Well, I think somebody will just prove their deep lack of understanding of economics and human psychology in the next few weeks/months/years.

I for one going to keep the above quotes on hand.



1533. Post 6272978 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.39h):

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on April 17, 2014, 07:05:28 PM
Houbi is now accepting 3rd party deposits just announced on their site.

http://www.huobi.com/news/index.php?a=show_notice&id=323&lang=en
Wait what?? lol
Wasn't 3rd party deposits banned??


See my previous posts, this apparently was the cause of the short-lived bump at 04-17 05:12 UTC. 

I belive that these "TOP-UP" cards are not the same thing as "3rd party payment processors depositing directly into Huobi's  bank account".  There seens to be a "4th party" involved, a card-issuing company.  The card company receives the money from Huobi clients via bank wire transfers or the 3rd party payment company, "recharges" the clients' cards, and then the cards can be used somehow to deposit money into the clients' internal Huobi accounts .  Thay is what I fantasized understood from Google Translate's output.

I wonder if the PBoC will be happy with that solution, but I would guess that they did not ask the PBoC beforehand...

You seem desperate to prove how doomed Bitcoin is, but you can't deny that PBoC policy is irrelevant to Bitcoin in the long term.

Bitcoin is resilient to bank policy by design.



1534. Post 6437168 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_12.41h):

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on April 28, 2014, 10:37:08 AM
making predictions based on the certainty, that bitcoin will be adopted by the entire world, is a little beyond dumb.

strawman. god im so sick of strawmans around here.

why do speculators have to begin and end every sentence with "probably imo" we are specualators, grow up. we are playing a game of probability and Risto knows this better than you.


If you know something about speculation, then you know that there is no certainty in speculation. If someone is trying to pretent certainty, especially in a subject that is extremely uncertain, then that someone is a useless tool.

Did you buy a fucking CASTLE with the money earning trading Bitcoins? He did.

All said.

He bought in when bitcoins were at $10, you do not need to be a genius to make a huge profit in that situation. I pretty much suck at trading and still I increased my original investment by x50, how about that?

Furthermore, to give everybody a little perspective: the "castle" (btw: it is a manor, not a castle) is in ruins and it costed less than what a biggish flat would cost in any top capital (New York, London, etc.)



1535. Post 8434189 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

There are only $5.72M sitting on Bitstamp's order book - anyone remembers if this is the lowest amount we had on Bitstamp's bid side in 2014? I'm curious... And I kinda miss blockchained.com historical market depth charts, anybody knows where to find historical charts for major exchanges bid/ask figures?



1536. Post 8435698 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Quote from: oda.krell on August 19, 2014, 12:24:03 PM
There are only $5.72M sitting on Bitstamp's order book - anyone remembers if this is the lowest amount we had on Bitstamp's bid side in 2014? I'm curious... And I kinda miss blockchained.com historical market depth charts, anybody knows where to find historical charts for major exchanges bid/ask figures?

Inevitable plug for

http://www.coinorama.net/

from me Cheesy

And the answer is, I'm afraid, yes (at least as far as coinorama's history goes)

Thanks for that!

We are definitely at a 2014 low in terms of fiat on Bitstamp's bid side




1537. Post 8452542 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.07h):

Did Jorge Stolfi buy bitcoins yet?



1538. Post 8744892 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.11h):

The satoshin@gmx.com hacker was very lame. He could have triggered a huge dump by:

1) short BTC everywhere
2) write to some core devs that you are about to dump big time, and that you are willing to give the heads-up to those that helped in the process of building bitcoin (that will have leaked almost immediately)
3) buy cheap coins (probably low double digits)
4) write again to the core devs that it was just a prank made by someone who got luck with GMX password reset feature.
 
That would have been awesome - we would have had a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to buy tens of k's of cheap coins, and the hacker himself would have made a huge killing.

Instead of that, hacker decides to send a stupid "send me BTC or I hitman you" email to then ask for 25 BTC... This is so ridiculous it must be a joke Cheesy



1539. Post 8747268 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.11h):

Quote from: tifozi on September 09, 2014, 04:14:22 PM
People are becoming very hateful and quarrelsome around here. It's no wonder though, many have put the highest of expectations into specific events/news the past few months, only to be disappointed again and again as they learn (and repeatedly forget) that news doesn't mean shit in a market ruled by sentiment.

News affects sentiments, but it isn't the only factor. Let's not be so dismissive of news.

You've just witnessed the most bullish news EVER (Paypal stating officially they bet on BTC) and still you see how market reacted.

In this market sentiment is driven by price, and price is driven by sentiment. It sounds like a paradox, but it isn't.



1540. Post 8747435 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.11h):

Quote from: Blitz­ on September 09, 2014, 04:31:45 PM
I'm sure that news does have temporary effects that can serve to extend/contract both time and price moves, but not much more than that. The overall conditions for news to bear fruit must be there.


Well said. Paypal might announce they are adopting bitcoin, even Bank of America could announce tomorrow that all their e-banking customers will have a BTC wallet, but nevertheless at this time market won't do shit.

The market trend will not reverse because of news. Sure, the paypal thing is fundamentally bullish and will only help adoption - but people won't start to buy bitcoin because of that. The average joe is thinking: "uh? Bitcoin? That's dead, right?" just because we are in a bear market - and the average joe does not invest in stuff that goes down.

When the trend reverses, then everybody will jump on board irrationaly - like they always do. And the trend will reverse when the last seller has sold his last coins. You only have a safe bet: buy when its going down (now for example) and SELL when it is going up. All the rest is gambling Wink



1541. Post 8747590 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.11h):

Quote from: BitChick on September 09, 2014, 04:44:41 PM
People are becoming very hateful and quarrelsome around here. It's no wonder though, many have put the highest of expectations into specific events/news the past few months, only to be disappointed again and again as they learn (and repeatedly forget) that news doesn't mean shit in a market ruled by sentiment.

I was having a discussion with BitChicksHusband this morning about this.  He said that it seems that negative news can affect the price more quickly than positive news.  What happens when there is some negative press is that people that already have some Bitcoin can sell off immediately.  However, with positive news those that have not yet purchased any coins but are interested in doing so have to begin the process of signing up or finding a place to purchase them.  This can take a while.  The affect on price is delayed because of this.  

It is true that is quicker to sell the BTC you already have than to buy your first coins, but if you pay attention you will see that during bull markets bad news have almost no effect on price (I remember the 2013 fork, it was just a flash crash) while positive news cause huge spikes. In any case only noobs trade on news, and they get burnt 99% of the time. During a bear market positive news will have almost no effect, during bull markets negative news don't do shit. The average trader is just looking at the price: if it goes up he buys and he doesn't want to sell - if it goes down he is certainly not buying, and probably he is selling.



1542. Post 8748385 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.11h):

Quote from: BitChick on September 09, 2014, 05:49:41 PM
Apple is talking about replacing wallets right now.  Please say Bitcoin.  Please say Bitcoin.  Smiley

liveblog:

http://live.arstechnica.com/apples-september-9-2014-event/

Apple Pay!?  Please don't disappoint me here. 

Apple ignoring bitcoin would be very bullish IMO.



1543. Post 9519996 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.30h):

Quote from: Le Happy Merchant on November 12, 2014, 02:51:05 PM
When I woke up today I was like "I bet Bitcoin is at 400 for no reason" Gotta love random ass price surges.

I'd wait a bit before opening the champagne... At least until we break $420 on the upside. Then I will become a raging bull again Smiley



1544. Post 10148238 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.48h):

I'm buying, guys. Great times Smiley



1545. Post 10200409 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_13.51h):

Wow: I just realized shroomsy turned ultra-bear. Fascinating.

If history repeats then we have a very strong "buy" indicator here.



1546. Post 11802106 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.19h):

And it begins.



1547. Post 11951165 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.21h):

Quote from: findftp on July 23, 2015, 10:45:53 AM
Look at 4 hour chart. We gonna moon

In this decade?

Just sell.



1548. Post 15189277 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Quote from: Elwar on June 13, 2016, 11:39:00 AM

Relative market volume is higher.

If you want to invent metrics to suit your case and use "relative market volume" as a measure then I think you'll find you got blown away by YB Coin which had 32 times more "Relative market volume" than Ethereum  Wink
That's why market volume is only relevant when huge spreads develop, i.e. you can't sell enough of your coin @spot. Clearly that's not the case for ETH, it's growing at an astounding rate, the price is skyrocketing. Bitcoin, OTH? Struggling to stay 1/2 its ATH Sad
And that's OK, because it's not about money. BTC has a thriving, vibrant community Smiley

Just paid my hosting service with bitcoins.

Which service accepts ethereums?

Regardless of that, Ethereum is bad money. There's no issuance plan (or let's say there is a new issuance plan every 2 months) nor a limit to ether supply, Vitalik will generate more ether (or not) as he sees fit. At the end of the day he is a de facto central banker, like it or not. Bitcoin's value proposal is the opposite: finite supply and predictable issuance rate - and that's what makes Bitcoin sound money.



1549. Post 15189578 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

Any good source for bid sum / ask sum charts?



1550. Post 15194358 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.52h):

mark toknormal's post - he is speaking the truth.

amen brother - if bitcoin survives a few years more there will be a whole generation for which bitcoin is simply better than gold - full stop.



1551. Post 15794925 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.56h):

Quote from: adamstgBit on August 02, 2016, 11:27:36 PM
How come they lost so much? Aren't they storing cold?

No. Users had multisig addys. They didn't use hot/cold.
can you (or anyone else ) explain the 2/3 keys needed to move the coins?

1 is the client
1 is bitfienx

what's the 3rd???

No. Client held no keys. One is finex. Two is bitgo. The third I think is also finex (offline). Either way is a shitty implementation.



1552. Post 17164802 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

After we pass the $785 mark on Stamp there's no real resistance until ATH. And you know what happens when we approach ATH, right? Media frenzy, irrational exuberance, and exponential we go.

On most other markets (Kraken, BTC-E, Huobi) that resistance point, which is the mid-June high, has already been broken. The other side of the story says that on Stamp we had a double or even triple top, which should be a bad signal.

But Bitcoin never gives a fuck about TA or double or triple tops. Up we go. I'm buying!




1553. Post 17164843 (copy this link) (by Rampion) (scraped on 2020-04-04_Sat_14.59h):

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on December 12, 2016, 10:34:43 PM
After we pass the $785 mark on Stamp there's no real resistance until ATH. And you know what happens when we approach ATH, right? Media frenzy, irrational exuberance, and exponential we go.

On most other markets (Kraken, BTC-E, Huobi) that resistance point, which is the mid-June high, has already been broken. The other side of the story says that on Stamp we had a double or even triple top, which should be a bad signal.

But Bitcoin never gives a fuck about TA or double or triple tops. Up we go. I'm buying!




Why after 785 will we get past 800,900,1000 without too much trouble?

Not really, we will go to ATH (around $1200) with no real resistance and then we go exponential for a relatively short time before the crash - like it always happened. I've witnessed this shit three times already Cheesy

Probably the big rally will not be as exponential and short-lived as in Dec 2013, Apr. 2013 and June 2011 (when price started doubling every week) because the coin is getting mature and the market getting bigger, much more money is needed for the price to double - but its still a very small market which is very prone to big rallies and big crashes.